The URL can be used to link to this page

Backup Documents 02/26/2002 RBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR MEETING FEBRUARY 26, 2002 Naples Daily News Naples, F'_ 34102 .lfidavit of ?ublica, ion NaNlrs Deily News BUAdu OF COJNTY COKAISSIONERS CHRIS HOR(ON PO BOY 4`..5016 Irks :.ES IL 34 WI-A16 2EFr NCE: W1,230 M20OL13 5841,400" NO.".Ct U F'IBLIC MEE s' :an: o- , loride °c :nth j-fi "ols ier Befora he undersigned authority, pe.,sonaL'y appea ecl ir,geLa 13� yan':, wh') on oath saes that she s,;, ,- it Secreta.•y of the Naples Dai Ly News, a daily ne.:sl :arar published at Naples, in CoLLie,° C,.,,.Y.y, FLorid3: that the attached copy cf adve, tisii j was p,ibLisoed in said newspaper on dries I.-stead. A f i ait furtl.�-r says that tha sa`,1 Naples Gaily News '.s r. newspaper published at Naples, ., said W.Lier Cour *y, Florida, and that the saia newspaper ha: heietc,'ore beer, continuou- Ly pubLisnet., in s--id CUI.ier County, Florida, each J%4y and Sias bv. :n enter =_J as second class mail matter at the ;post office in Nap Les, in said CCLLieP Cc,unty, Florida, for a ptricd of 1 year next prer.e Jno the irst puhlicat :on of '.tae attache' copy ,f ad-.,ertisement; and aff ;int ;urnler says that she ha; neither paid nor promised &ny person, firm or ca,poration any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of secur;n;, this advertis;emem, for pubLiction in the said newspaper. "D SPACE.* 55j,J(J INL,l r ILIT ON" Signature oi Afti::'A �+�1 ictrn to =,004 Sup: -gibed bSf ft, a: th::, r,+ k .owl: by .Ise day of MY Commission DD068336 O''" E'p'os September 11, 2005 r 200 of COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA February 26, 2002 9:00 a.m. NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH THE COUNTY MANAGER PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. COLLIER COUNTY ORDINANCE NO. 99 -22 REQUIRES THAT ALL LOBBYISTS SHALL, BEFORE ENGAGING IN ANY LOBBYING ACTIVITIES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, ADDRESSING THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS), REGISTER WITH THE CLERK TO THE BOARD AT THE BOARD MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY MANAGER AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS". ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS PERMISSION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. IF YOU ARE A PERSON WITH A DISABILITY WHO NEEDS ANY ACCOMMODATION IN ORDER TO PARTICIPATE IN THIS PROCEEDING, YOU ARE ENTITLED, AT NO COST TO YOU, TO THE PROVISION OF 1 February 26, 2002 CERTAIN ASSISTANCE. PLEASE CONTACT THE COLLIER COUNTY FACILITIES MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT LOCATED AT 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL, NAPLES, FLORIDA, 341129 (941) 774 -8380; ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. LUNCH RECESS SCHEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. 1. INVOCATION AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE A. Reverend Susan Diamond, First Christian Church 2. AGENDA AND MINUTES Approved and /or adopted with changes — 5/0 A. Approval of today's regular, consent and summary agenda as amended. (Ex Parte Disclosure provided by Commission members for summary agenda.) B. January 29, 2002 — Workshop C. January 29, 2002 — Arnold and Blair Contract Approval D. February 5, 2002 — Sheriff Workshop E. February 5, 2002 — District 1 Town Hall Meeting F. February 6, 2002 — Special LDC Meeting 3. PROCLAMATIONS A. Proclamation to recognize the Friends of the Library. To be accepted by Mr. Jay Wolff, President, Friends of the Library. Adopted — 510 B. Proclamation to acknowledge the work of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society. To be accepted by Dr. Lunney, Karen Dresbach and Krista Fitzsimmons. Adopted — 5/0 2 February 26, 2002 C. Proclamation to recognize Peter Bolton for his Outstanding Safety Record. To be accepted by Peter Bolton, Helicopter Operations. Adopted - 5/0 D. Proclamation to recognize Dale Huguley for Volunteer of the Year for Collier County Emergency Management. To be accepted by Dale Huguley. Adopted — 5/0 E. Proclamation for Aviation Day. To be accepted by Peter Manion and Ted Soliday. Adopted — 5/0 Added F. Plaque presented to Commissioner James Carter for Outstanding Leadership in Collier County Adopted - 5/0 Added G. Proclamation recognizing Brian Shinier for his outstanding achievement and claiming March 1, 2002 as Brian Shimer Day. Adopted — 5/0 4. SERVICE AWARDS Presented Five -Year Attendees: 1) Jason Toreky, Code Enforcement 2) Joseph Thomas, Water Treatment 3) Marla Ramsey, Parks and Recreation Ten -Year Attendees: 4) Steven Preston, Stormwater Management Twenty -Year Attendees: 5) Ephrim McMullen, Ochopee Fire Department 5. PRESENTATIONS 3 February 26, 2002 6. PUBLIC PETITIONS AND COMMENTS ON GENERAL TOPICS A. Public Comments on General Topics 1) Ken Thompson regarding neighborhood bar. 2) Colin Kelly regarding sand on the beach 7. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS 8. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. This item was continued from the February 12, 2002 BCC Meeting. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. PUD- 2000 -22, William L. Hoover, AICP, of Hoover Planning and Wayne Arnold of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., representing Pine Ridge Redevelopment Group, requesting a rezone from "RSF -4" Residential Single Family and "C -1" Professional Commercial District to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as Goodlette Corners PUD for the purpose of permitting commercial, office and service land uses for property located on the southwest corner of Pine Ridge Road, (CR 896) and Goodlette -Frank Road (CR 85 1) in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Ordinance 2002 -08 — Adopted with changes 5/0 B. This item was continued from the February 12, 2002 BCC Meeting. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Public Hearing to consider adoption of an Ordinance establishing the Flow Way Community Development District (CDD) pursuant to Section 190.005, Florida Statutes. Ordinance 2002 -09 Adopted — 510 9. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A. Discussion regarding increasing fines for red -light running. (Commissioner Carter) Staff to work with the Sheriffs Office, prepare ordinance with a $500 fine and come back to the Board — 510 B. Report to Board of County Commissioners regarding Florida Association of Counties Legislative Day Activities. (Commissioner Carter) 4 February 26, 2002 Report Accepted — 5/0 Added C. Discussion by the Board to reconvene at 6:00 p.m., March 4, 2002, the Rural Fringe Final Hearing to allow attendance of the public that are not able to attend meeting during the day. (Commissioner Henning) Meeting to begin at 9:00 a.m. , recess and then reconvene at 6:00 P.M. (Consensus) 10. COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT A. Reconsideration of 2002 Tourism Agreement between Collier County and Prutos Public Relations, Inc. (Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development) 30 -day notice to be given to Prutos to terminate contract and Staff to advertise for Tourism Director — 5/0 B. Request by Adrienne Cozette, representing Friends of Art at the Naples Museum of Art and Galleries, for a Waiver of Right -of -Way permit fees for temporary parking in the Right -of -Way. (Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development) Denied — 4/1 (Commissioner Carter opposed) C. This item has been deleted. D. Authorize an agreement in the amount of $53,217 to fulfill a commitment of the Olde Cypress Planned Unit Development. (Joseph K. Schmitt, Administrator, Community Development) Approved — 5/0 E. Adopt a Resolution authorizing condemnation of right -of -way and/or easements required for the construction of a four -lane section of Immokalee Road between Wilson Boulevard and 43rd Avenue N.E., Capital Improvement Element No. 71 (Project No. 60018). (Norman E. Feder, AICP, Administrator, Transportation Services) Res. 2002 -125 — Adopted 4/0 (Commissioner Carter out) F. This item to be heard as last item to Board Meeting: Strategic Planning Follow Up. (Thomas W. 011iff, County Manager) 5 February 26, 2002 Three different headings detailed in the executive summary as recommended by Staff — Approved 4/0 (Commissioner Carter out) Added G. A resolution opposing legislation to rescind the eminent domain authority of Collier Counaty or to otherwise restrict or limit Collier County jurisdiction over local water and wastewater utilities. (Staff request) Res. 2002 -126 — Adopted 4/0 (Commissioner Coyle out) Moved from Item #16B5 H. Authorization for staff to amend the current agreement with McDonald Transit Associates Inc., to implement operational and management modifications to the Collier Area Transit (CAT) system in the amount of $234,307.00. (Commissioner Coyle request) Approved with exception of salary related issues which will be brought back on March 12, 2002 — 3/1 (Commissioner Carter out and Coyle opposed) Moved from Item #16E5 I. Authorize the Chairman to sign five applications submitted by Collier County Government to the National Association of Counties (NACo) Awards Program. Approved — 4/0 (Commissioner Carter out) Moved from Item #16C10 J. Approve a design build contract with Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., for new reverse osmosis raw water supply wells for the North County Regional Water Treatment Plant, Project 70075, in the amount of $3,973,196. (Staff request) Approved with stipulations — 4/0 (Commissioner Carter out) 11. AIRPORT AUTHORITY 12. COUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT A. This item to be heard at 2:00 p.m. or at the conclusion of the regular meeting agenda, whichever occurs first. Closed Attorney - Client Session requested by County Attorney at February 12, 2002 Board Meeting pursuant to Section 286.011 (8), Fla. Stat., to discuss settlement negotiations and/or strategy related to litigation expenditures in Thomas Wajerski, v. Collier 6 February 26, 2002 County, Case Nos. 95- 3067 -CA -01 and 95- 2955 -CA in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida and Case No. 99 -303 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida. CLOSED SESSION B. This item to be heard immediately following Item 12 A. This item was continued from the February 12, 2002 BCC Meeting. Recommendation that the Board approve the settlement of all pending litigation and claims involving Thomas Wajerski, including, without limitation, Case Nos. 95- 3067 -CA -01 and 95- 2955 -CA in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida and Case no. 99 -303 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, and authorize the Chairman to sign all necessary settlement documents. Approved with stipulations — 3/1 (Commissioner Coletta opposed and Commissioner Carter out) 13. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 14. FUTURE AGENDAS 15. STAFF AND COMMISSION GENERAL COMMUNICATIONS A. Chairman to send letter to legislative delegation opposing diverting ship funds to the Everglades restoration B. Staff directed to advertise on Channel 11 regarding Florida Div. Of Forestry meeting in Golden Gate Estates regarding providing wildfire information C. Letter regarding ethics ordinance sent to Dr. Ferenz indicating that all documents would be provided to him. Dr Ferenz to provide his scope of work to the BCC for approval. 16. CONSENT AGENDA - All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one motion without separate discussion of each item. If discussion is desired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. 7 February 26, 2002 Approved and /or adopted with changes — 5/0 A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1) Request to approve for recording the final plat of "Island Walk Phase One -B ". 2) Request to approve for recording the final plat of "Island Walk Phase Seven" and approval of the Standard Form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the performance security. With stipulations 3) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Grey Oaks Unit Ten ". Res. 2002 -99 4) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Grey Oaks Unit Twelve ". Res. 2002 -100 5) Request to grant final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements for the final plat of "Grey Oaks Unit Thirteen ". Res. 2002 -101 6) Request to approve for recording the final plat of "Runaway Bay at Fiddler's Creek" and approval of the Standard Form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the performance security. With stipulations 7) Approve committee selection of Henderson, Young and Company for contract negotiations for RFP 02 -3317 "Consultant Services for Impact Fee Update Studies - Educational Facilities ". 8) Adopt Resolutions enforcing liens on properties for Code Violations. Res. 2002 -102 through 2002 -110 9) Adoption of a Resolution approving two (2) applications for Impact Fee Waivers for eligible charitable organizations. 8 February 26, 2002 Res. 2002 -111 10) Approval of a lease between C.P.O.C. Realty and Collier County for office space to be utilized by the Natural Resources Department and a Budget Amendment to fund the relocation of the Natural Resources Department. B. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES 1) Adopt a Resolution authorizing the conveyance of Collier County owned real estate to the State of Florida Department of Transportation for the construction of roadway interchange improvements to State Road 93 (I -75) at the overpass of County Road 886 (Golden Gate Parkway). Res 2002 -112 2) Approve a Donation Agreement and accept a drainage easement for the benefit of the Wiggins Pass Drainage Basin. 3) Approve an Easement Agreement and accept a drainage easement for the Lely Stormwater Improvement Project. 4) Approve Amendment No. 1 to the contract for professional engineering services by C112M Hill for Immokalee Road (CR 951 to 43rd Avenue NE) four -lane design, Project No. 60018 in the amount of $230,444.00. Moved to Item #10H 5) Authorization for staff to amend the current agreement with McDonald Transit Associates Inc., to implement operational and management modifications to the Collier Area Transit (CAT) system in the amount of $234,307.00. 6) Approve award of a construction contract to the lowest bidder, APAC, Inc., for right turn lane from Immokalee Road to 47th Avenue NE in the amount of $53,613.90, Bid No. 02 -3340. 7) Approve the piggybacking of a Village of Wellington (Palm Beach County) contract to purchase a front -end loader for the Road and 9 February 26, 2002 Bridge section, approximate cost $70,000. 8) Approve an agreement for construction of access improvements for Pebblebrooke Plaza located at Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard (CR 951). 9) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners extend the present Services Agreement for the Pelican Bay Services Division until December 31, 2002. Added 10) Approval to enter into an Agreement with the Florida Department of Community Affairs for the reimbursement of emergency protective measure expenditures. (Staff request) C. PUBLIC UTILITIES 1) Adopt a Resolution approving the Satisfaction of Liens for Solid Waste Residential Accounts wherein the County has received payment and said liens are satisfied in full for the 1991 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessments. Fiscal Impact is $34.50 to record the liens. Res. 2002 -113 2) Adopt a Resolution approving the Satisfaction of Liens for Solid Waste Residential Accounts wherein the County has received payment and said liens are satisfied in full for the 1992 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessments. Fiscal Impact is $70.50 to record the liens. Res. 2002 -114 3) Adopt a Resolution approving the Satisfaction of Liens for Solid Waste Residential Accounts wherein the County has received payment and said liens are satisfied in full for the 1993 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessments. Fiscal Impact is $58.50 to record the liens. Res. 2002 -115 4) Adopt a Resolution approving the Satisfaction of Liens for Solid Waste Residential Accounts wherein the County has received 10 February 26, 2002 payment and said liens are satisfied in full for the 1994 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessments. Fiscal Impact is $82.50 to record the liens. Res. 2002 -116 5) Adopt a Resolution approving the Satisfaction of Liens for Solid Waste Residential Accounts wherein the County has received payment and said liens are satisfied in full for the 1995 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessments. Fiscal Impact is $184.50 to record the liens. Res. 2002 -117 6) Adopt a Resolution approving the Satisfaction of Liens for Solid Waste Residential Accounts wherein the County has received payment and said liens are satisfied in full for the 1996 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Assessments. Fiscal Impact is $226.50 to record the liens. Res 2002 -118 7) Approve the Satisfaction of Lien documents filed against Real Property for abatement of nuisance and direct the Clerk of Courts to record same in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Fiscal Impact is $78.00 to record the liens. 8) Approval and Execution of Satisfactions of Notice of Promise to pay and agreement to extend payment of water and/or sewer system impact fees. Fiscal Impact is $91.50 to record the liens. 9) Approve a contract for engineering services to Agnoli, Barber and Brundage for the relocation of utilities in advance of widening US 41 from Old 41 to the County line. The project number is 70045 and the contract amount is $41,900. Work Order ABB- FT -02 -01 Changed and Moved to Item #10J 10) Approve a design build contract with Metcalf and Eddy, Inc., for new reverse osmosis raw water supply wells for the North County Regional Water Treatment Plant, Project 70075, in the amount of $3,973,196. (Staff request) 11 February 26, 2002 11) Approve Work Order GH- FT -02 -1 with Greeley and Hansen LLC, to perform field excavation and investigation on the existing 30 -inch sewer force main, Project 73943 in the amount of $108,120. 12) Approve new escrow account for County utility relocations in conjunction with US 41 road widening from Myrtle Road to Old US 41, Projects 70047, 70048 and 73048. Chairman to sign Memorandum of Agreement in the amount of $275,960.62 with FDOT 13) Waive purchasing competitive bid policy and approve the use of the Parkson Corporation to assist with the rebuilding of the North County Water Reclamation Facility Mechanical Bar Screens for the amount of $581052.00. 14) Approve Waiver of Single Job Cap of $200,000- Contract 99 -2915 with Lightner Contracting, Inc. for up to $700,000. For Beach sand sifting /rock removal 15) Approve a Resolution authorizing declarations of official intent under U.S. Treasury Regulations with respect to reimbursements from note and bond proceeds of temporary advances made for payments prior to issuance, and other related matters, for the North County Water Reclamation Facility, Project 73077. Res. 2002 -119 16) Approval to enter an agreement with the Florida Department of Community Affairs for the reimbursement of Emergency Protective Measure Expenditures. D. PUBLIC SERVICES 1) Approve a Transportation Agreement with the Collier County School Board for camp participants in the amount of $47,000. Utilization of school buses to transport camp participants 2) Approve a Budget Amendment to recognize revenue from insurance proceeds to replace two stolen mowers in the amount of $9,678 12 February 26, 2002 3) Approve application from National Recreation and Parks Association for accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies. 4) Approve the Older Americans Act Continuation Grant and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract between Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the Area Agency on Aging for Southwest Florida, Inc., DBA /Senior Solutions of Southwest Florida, and authorize increase of one permanent part time position to permanent full time status in the amount of $658,100. 5) Approve the Master Agreement relating to Services for Seniors' Grant Programs and authorize the Chairman to sign the Master Agreement between Collier County Board of County Commissioners and the Area Agency on Aging for Southwest Florida, Inc., DBA /Senior Solutions of Southwest Florida. 6) Award Bid #02 -3323 boardwalk deck and handrail replacement at Barefoot Beach Access, Barefoot Beach Preserve park, and South Marco Beach Access in the amount of $194,427. Awarded to Quality Enterprises, U.S.A., Inc. for boardwalk deck and handrail replacements E. ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES 1) Approve Committee Selection of six firms for contract negotiations for RFP 02 -3324 "Fixed Term Surveying and Photogrametric Services ". As contained in the Executive Summary 2) Approve staff's short list for architectural services for the design of the Grey Oaks Public Safety Facility, RFP #02 -3326. Staff to negotiate with Barany, Schmitt, Summers, Weaver & Partners, Inc. 3) Approve the Budget Amendments to transfer reserves from Fund 517, Group Health and Life, to the new Fund 519, Short -Term and Long - Term Disability in the amount of $250,000. 4) Approval of a Resolution establishing an Employee Health and Wellness Prevention, Incentive and Reimbursement Program to 13 February 26, 2002 reward employees who participate in County sponsored or endorsed health and wellness programs. Estimated annual cost $35,000. Res. 2002 -120 Moved to Item #10I 5) Authorize the Chairman to sign five applications submitted by Collier County Government to the National Association of Counties (NACo) Awards Program. 6) Recommendation to declare certain county -owned property as surplus and authorize a sale of the surplus property on March 16, 2002. 7) Reject Bid received on Bid #02 -3341 "Laboratory Chemicals and Supplies" Bid rejected from KSE Scientific 8) Approve and execute an agreement with the Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District providing for a maximum expenditure of $35,850.00 from the GAC Land Trust to purchase personal protective equipment. 9) Approve and execute an agreement with the Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District providing for the trade -in value of $40,500 for an older pumper truck to be applied towards the purchase of a new pumper truck. 10) Approve Master Purchase Agreement for RFP 01 -3282 Wireless Application Systems. Awarded to Dua computer Resources, Inc. F. EMERGENCY SERVICES 1) Approval of a Disaster Relief Funding Agreement between the Florida Department of Community Affairs and the Ochopee Fire and Rescue Control District for the reimbursement of disaster related expenses in the amount of $36,280, approval of the associated resolution, and approval of the necessary budget amendment to recognize and appropriate additional revenue and appropriate funds from reserves Res. 2002 -121 14 February 26, 2002 G. COUNTY MANAGER 1) Approval of Budget Amendment Report — Budget Amendment #02- 189. H. AIRPORT AUTHORITY I. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Deleted 1) Commissioner request for approval for payment to attend function serving a valid public purpose. (Commissioner Coletta) All Commissioners approved to attend 2) Commissioner request for approval for payment to attend function serving a valid public purpose. (Commissioner Fiala) 3) Commissioner request for approval for payment to attend function serving a valid public purpose. (Commissioner Coletta) All Commissioners approved to attend J. MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE 1) Satisfaction of Lien: NEED MOTION authorizing the Chairman to sign Satisfaction of Lien for Services for the Public Defender for Case No's: C 1 K020130 -12. RECOMMENDED APPROVAL. 2) Miscellaneous items to file for record with action as directed. K. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 1) Approve agreement with The City of Naples for Election Services. L. COUNTY ATTORNEY 1) Recommendation that the Board ratify and authorize the County Attorney's retention of expert witnesses /consultants /outside counsel for the County in Aquaport, LC v. Collier County, Case No. 2:01 -CV- 341 -FTM-29DNF in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, exempt the County Attorney from the purchasing 15 February 26, 2002 policy if and to the extent the purchasing policy is applicable and authorize the Chairman to sign any necessary retention documents. 2) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Resolution of a potential lien by the Social Services Department of Collier County against Wanda Hensley by way of acceptance of the sum of fifteen hundred dollars ($1,500) from Wanda Hensley and in return Collier County would release all claims against Wanda Hensley for payment of medical services provided on behalf of Wanda Hensley up to and including July 1999 but not subsequent thereto. 3) Recommendation that the Board approve Amendment Number 4 to the Legal Services Agreement with the Law Firm of Carlton, Fields, Ward Emmanuel, Smith and Cutler, P.A. 4) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Supplemental and Amended Stipulated Final Judgment relative to the easement acquisition on Parcels 106A, 106B, 706 and 806 in the Lawsuit entitled Collier County v. Naples Italian American Club, Inc., et al, Case No. 98- 1672 -CA -01 (Airport Road Six - Laning Project from Pine Ridge Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road). 5) Approve the Agreed Order awarding expert fees relative to the fee simple and easement acquisition of Parcels 155 and 855 in the Lawsuit entitled Collier County v. Ronald G. Bender and Michele J. Bender, Trustees Under That Certain Declaration of Trust Dated the 17Ih Day of May, 1991, et al, Case No. 99- 1394 -CA (Livingston Road, Project No. 60061). 6) Approve attorney's fees associated with the acquisition of Parcel 163 in the Lawsuit entitled Collier County v. Russell Baisley, et al, Case No. 01- 0758 -CA (Livingston Road six - laning project from Golden Gate Parkway to Pine Ridge Road, Project No. 60071). 7) Approve two mediated settlement agreement and two stipulated final judgments incorporating the same terms and conditions as the mediated settlement agreements relative to the acquisition of Parcels 2AT and 53T in the Lawsuit entitled Collier County v. John B. Fassett, Trustee of the Anne M. Fassett Trust Dated 615186, et al, Case 16 February 26, 2002 No. 99- 3040 -CA, Project No. 65041. 17. SUMMARY AGENDA - THIS SECTION IS FOR ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS AND MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: 1) A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FROM STAFF; 2) UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OR OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OF ALL MEMBERS PRESENT AND VOTING; 3) NO WRITTEN OR ORAL OBJECTIONS TO THE ITEM RECEIVED BY STAFF, THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, OTHER AUTHORIZING AGENCIES OR THE BOARD, PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE BCC MEETING ON WHICH THE ITEMS ARE SCHEDULED TO BE HEARD; AND 4) NO INDIVIDUALS ARE REGISTERED TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE ITEM. SHOULD ANY OF THE FOLLOWING ITEMS BE MOVED TO THE REGULAR AGENDA ALL PARTICIPANTS MUST BE SWORN IN. A. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. VA- 2001 -AR -1442, Kirk Sanders, requesting a 2.3 foot after - the -fact variance from the required 10 -foot rear yard setback establishing for accessory structures to 7.7 feet for property located at 1139 Sperling Avenue, further described as Lot 14, Block B, Sperlings Subdivision, in Section 22, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. Res. 2002 -122 Continued to March 26, 2002 BCC Meeting B. This item was continued from the January 22, 2002 BCC Meeting. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. CU- 2001 -AR -1420, William L. Hoover, AICP, Hoover Planning and Development, Incorporated, representing Pastor Colin Rampton, of the Seventh Day Adventist Church, requesting conditional uses "7" and "11" of the "A -MHO" Rural Agricultural Zoning District/Mobile Home Zoning Overlay, for a church and child care on property located at the northwest corner of Lilac Lane and Immokalee Road in Section 23, Township 47 South, Range 27 East. C. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. VA- 2001 -AR -1526, Kraft Construction Company, Inc., representing Diocese of Venice Catholic 17 February 26, 2002 Church, requesting a 6.5 foot variance from the required 30 -foot front yard setback to 23.5 feet for property located at 5225 Golden Gate Parkway, in Section 28, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Res. 2002 -123 D. This item requires that all participants be sworn in and ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Petition AVPLAT- 2001- AR1835 to disclaim, renounce and vacate the County's and the public's interest in the 15' wide drainage easement located along the lot line common to Lots 7 and 8, according to the plat of "Mediterra Parcel 111" as recorded in Plat Book 37, Pages 8 through 9, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, located in Section 11, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. Res. 2002 -124 � ; 1 �111.�►1 INQUIRIES CONCERNING CHANGES TO THE BOARD'S AGENDA SHOULD BE MADE TO THE COUNTY MANAGER'S OFFICE AT 774 -8383. 18 February 26, 2002 E 2A AGENDA CHANGES BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' MEETING February 26, 2002 ADD ITEM 9C: Discussion by the Board to reconvene at 6:00 p.m., March 4, 2002, the Rural Fringe Final Hearing to allow attendance of the public that are not able to attend meeting during the day. (Commissioner Henning.) ADD ITEM 10(G): A Resolution opposing legislation to rescind the eminent domain authority of Collier County or to otherwise restrict or limit Collier County jurisdiction over local water and wastewater utilities. (Staff request.) MOVE ITEM 16(B)5 TO 10(H): Authorization for staff to amend the current agreement with McDonald Transit Associates, Inc., to implement operational and management modifications to the Collier Area Transit (CAT) system in the amount of $234,307. (Commissioner Coyle request.) ADD ITEM 16(B)10: Approval to enter into an Agreement with the Florida Department of Community Affairs for the reimbursement of emergency protective measure expenditures. (Staff request.) CORRECTION TO ITEM 16(C)10: Correction to dollar amount in the title should have been "$3,973,196" (rather than $4,193,196.) Executive Summary information is correct. (Staff request.) CORRECTION TO ITEM 16(C)16: Correction to contract number in the Executive Summary, which should have been Contract # #02 -RM* 2- 09 -21- 20 -017 (rather than #02 -RM *2- 09 -21 -20 -016). (Staff request.) DELETE ITEM 16(1)2: Commissioner request for approval for payment to attend function service a valid public purpose. (Commissioner Fiala request.) CONTINUE ITEM 17(B) TO MARCH 26, 2002 BCC MEETING: CU- 2001 -AR -1420, William L. Hoover, AICP, Hoover Planning and Development, Incorporated, representing Pastor Colin Rampton, of the Seventh Day Adventist Church, requesting conditional uses "7" and "11" of the "A -MHO" Rural Agricultural Zoning District/Mobile Home Zoning Overlay, for a church and child care on property located at the northwest corner of Lilac Lane and Immokalee Road in Section 23, Township 47 South, Range 27 East. (Petitioner request.) 3A PROCLAMA TION WHEREAS, Collier County's first public library was established by the Friends of The Library in 1957; and, WHEREAS, this group incorporated as a non -profit organization in 1961 and with the assistance of the Lee family, who purchased a square block of land on Central Avenue in downtown Naples, deeded the site to the friends of the Library as a site for a library structure; and, WHEREAS, in 1966 the first free public library in the County opened its doors, constructed with funds raised entirely by the friends of the Library; and, WHEREAS, presently there are eight libraries within the system, with the ninth, the new Heaq**00s Di Library in North Naples, scheduled t aitahin twee; #r a WHEREAS, over t e ; Gi► ' 7- years, the support oe %vedq From the Friends of has beef p jin ©unt� pr+`j�"gunding for eauifurnite.`altra »inq� eA ; =rrograms; and, NOW of for DONE AND ORDERED THIS 26th Day of February 2002. C. t1KC/r'X' GLCxx Commissioners of the Library Library system. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIN,,, _ PROCLAMA TION 38 WHEREAS, multiple sclerosis is one of the most common diseases of the central nermus system effecting over 14, 000 people in Florida, 4000 people in South Florida, and over 200 people in Collier County alone, and, WHEREAS, the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, with its 1500 staff and 8010, 000 volunteers nationally has since 1946 served as the primary source for research funding, information and services to people with MS and their loved ones, and, WHEREAS, the South Florida Chapter of the National Multiple Sclerosis Society provides a wide variety of programs and services to people with MS and their families in Collier County, and, WHEREAS, these free services include support groups, Tai Chi classes, women's retreat, information and referral, advocacy, lending library, peer couns and, WHEREAS, the in C WHEREAS, NOW Collier +.mince 1980 ano ;/ras ,fir ?r CountyLsi ce s o��ultp /e, sc %x �idar that "the' N -,South Florida had an active chapter support group annual 'MS of raising critical funds DONE AND ORDERED THIS 26th Day of February, Z00Z. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROCLAMA TION 4 3C.,. WHEREAS, Peter 6. Bo /ton has faithfu lly executed his duties as o Med Flight Helicopter Pilot for Collier County since 1988; and, WHEREAS, Mr. Bo /ton, during this period, flew hundreds of missions during both daytime and nighttime and in a// types of weather in support of Collier County Emergency Medical Services and other county agencies; and, WHEREAS, Mr. Bo /ton completed over S, OM accident -free hours with no flight violations for the post fourteen years, and, WHEREAS, the Helicopter Association International has decreed that he has met the very stringent standards, as set forth by the Association and the federal Aviation Administration, and Mr. Bo /ton has been - r $dfety Award! NOW THEREFORE. DONE AND x DWI E. BROOK, CLERK AAk '8.",.,,.. COUNTY, Commissioners of ,recognized for and applauded h607,a/'r Pilot 3� { PROCLAMA TION • WHEREAS, Dole Huguley has been o valued member of the Emergency Management Team as a volunteer for many years; and, WHEREAS, Mr. Hugu/ey has developed several innovative software programs to benefit the notional Amateur Radio community, and, WHEREAS, Mr. Huguley has presented several seminars in amateur radio communications at the annual Governor's Hurricane Conference at his own expense; and, WHEREAS, Mr. Hugu/ey has donated hundreds of hours over the post decade to ensure that the amateur radio systems in Emergency Management were operating flaw less /y; and, WHEREAS, from May 2001 t 3 3,��,� Dale Humley provided outstondino ct�o '�b�'te.. administration for the O' COMMISSIONERS FLORIDA JIM COLETTA, CHAIRMAN 3E 1.14 PROCLAMA TION WHEREAS, the Nap /es Municipal Airport has served the community well since World War II and continues to be an integral part of the infrastructure, economic fabric, and quality of life in our community; and, WHEREAS, Aviation Day was started by the Civil Air Patrol to educate the public as to a// aspects of genera/ aviation; and, WHEREAS, the tradition has continued with the support of the Civil Air Patrol, the Experimental Aircraft Association, the Naples Pilots Association, the Naples Airport Authority, and the Friends of the Naples Municipal Airport; and, WHEREAS, Aviation Day provides access to and information about the fie /d; and, a E x 3 .._ WHEREAS, Aviation NOW THEREFORE,"° Ulf Collier Coum DONE AND men and _ is Florida, "that March 2"°; , ATTEST: Dw E. BROOK, CLERK and invite the ►ilots, ground T of as attending Municipal F' J3Qli,"+i7lNTY COMMISSIONERS t 3G PROCLAMA TTON • Whereas, Brian Shimer, life -long Naples resident, competing in his fifth Olympic Winter Games, steered a four man bobsled team in an impressi ve final run to earn the Olympic bronze medal, the first bobsled medal to be won by a U. S team in 46 years; and, Whereas, Brian, in 1993, became the first American driver to win a World Cup title in the four man bobsled, and three World Championship medals in a sport normally dominated by European competitors; and, Whereas, Brian, as Whereas, as set an i rMira]J+l�tal�tc�yt ork an fortiy�efi' } NOW THERSP �� a it p "roe /aiMec by the Board of 21 of determination, has is,, County and that with "March 6th, be Shimer Day. DONE AND ORDERED THIS 26pa ebrLOry, 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FOgIQA _ k A, CHAIRMAN A T7FST.- E. Brock, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA . REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To. Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: 8 XXX Normal legal Advertisement ❑ Other: (Display Adv., location, etc.) t** w*********** w**** w* w**«******«. *,r,► * * * * * * *,r,rw *w� *,► *,t «• *.w * * * *w* • w�w�• w,► * * * * * *w *+tww * * « * * * *f *• «rr * *r Originating Dept/ Div: Comm.Dev.Serv./Planning Person: Date: (1,y 10 e, Petition No. (If none, give brief description): PUD- 2000 -22 i Petitioner: (Name & Address): Pine Ridge Redevelopment Group, c/o Amy Ashby, 1298 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34108 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Mr. D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor Associates, P.A., 10911 Bonita Beach Road, Suite 105, Bonita Springs, Fla. 33923 Hearing before: XXX BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: 2/12/02 Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News Other ❑ Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: PUD- 2000 -22, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor Associates, P.A., representing Pine Ridge Redevelopment Group, requesting a rezone from "RSF -4" and "C -1" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as Goodlette Comers PUD for commercial uses, for property located on the southwest comer of Goodlette Road and Pine Ridge Road, in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 8.52± acres. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: N/A Does Petition Fee include advertising cost?j6i Ye�si ❑ No 113- 138312 - 649110 / Reviewed by: If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: List Attachments: Approved by: County Manager DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS Date A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: ❑ County Manager agenda file: to ❑ Requesting Division Clerk's Office ❑ Original B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE O Y• Date Received: OtIlolla a-- Date of Public hearing: 0 D z. Date Advertised: ORDINANCE NO. 02- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91 -102 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 9515N; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "RSF -4" AND "C -1" TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS GOODLETTE CORNERS PUD LOCATED IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 8.52± ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 8A "!► WHEREAS, William L. Hoover, AICP, of Hoover Planning and Development, Inc., representing Pine Ridge Redevelopment Group, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "RSF -4" and "C -1" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the Goodlette Corners PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. The Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 9515N, as described in Ordinance Number 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency 1 Marjorie M. Student 1 Assistant County Attorney g/admin/PUD- 2000- 22 /CB /im 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN -1- GOODLETTE CORNERS PUD A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PREPARED FOR: PINE RIDGE REDEVELOPMENT GROUP C/O AMY ASHBY 1298 PINE RIDGE ROAD NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108 PREPARED BY: WILLIAM L. HOOVER, AICP HOOVER PLANNING & DEV., INC. 3785 AIRPORT ROAD N., SUITE B -1 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34105 and JEFF L. DAVIDSON, P.E. DAVIDSON ENGINERING, INC. 1720 J. & C. BLVD., SUITE C NAPLES, FLORIDA 34109 and RICHARD D. YOVANOVICH GOODLETTE, COLEMAN & JOHNSON, P.A. 4001 N. TAMIAMI TRAIL, SUITE 300 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103 DATE FILED DATE REVISED DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC DATE APPROVED BY BCC ORDINANCE NUMBER EXHIBIT "A" 8 A December 29, 2000 April 25, 2001 8A TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF EXHIBITS STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 1 SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 3 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 5 SECTION III COMMERCIAL AREAS PLAN 7 SECTION IV DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 13 m LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT "A" PUD MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "C" LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of approximately 8.52± acres of property in Collier County, as a Planned Unit Development to be known as Goodlette Corners PUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The commercial facilities of the Goodlette Corners PUD will be consistent with the growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives for the following reasons: 1. The subject property is within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Sub - District as shown on the Future Land Use Map and meets the requirements of the Office and In -fill Commercial Sub - District of the Urban - Mixed Use District in the Future Land Use Element. The Future Land Use Element permits commercial land uses on the subject land since the project meets the requirements of the Office and In -fill Commercial Sub - District by: fronting on a collector or arterial roadway, abutting commercial zoning along its western boundary, the depth of proposed commercial uses does not exceed the depth of the abutting commercial uses, the project will be served by public water and sewer, the project will be compatible with existing and permitted future land uses on surrounding properties, and the subject land area is less than twelve acres. 2. The subject property's location in relation to existing or proposed community facilities and services permits the development's commercial intensity as described in Objective 2 of the Future Land Use Element. 3. The project development's proposed uses and perimeter buffering will allow it to be compatible and complimentary to surrounding land uses, including an existing home that comprises part of its western boundary, as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element. 4. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element. 5. The project development is planned to protect the functioning of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as described in Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element. 6. All final local development orders for this project are subject to Division 3.15, Adequate Public Facilities, of the Collier County Land Development Code. 7. The Goodlette Corners PUD meets the intent of Policies 4.4 and 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element, which encourage the Board of County Commissioners 8A °!M to consider redevelopment plans for specific areas, including Pine Ridge Road between U.S. 41 and Goodlette -Frank Road. 8. The easternmost property zoned C -1 was reviewed under the Zoning Reevaluation Program and is deemed consistent by Future Land Use Element Map 10. Pursuant to Future Land Use Element Policy 4.7, the easternmost property is allowed to make changes to the intensity of uses in order to encourage re- development. 0) SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name of Goodlette Corners PUD. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property being 8.52± acres, is located in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, and is fully described as on Exhibit "B ". 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is owned by numerous property owners. A complete breakdown is shown on Exhibit "C ". 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA A. The subject property is located at the southwest corner of the intersection between Goodlette Road and Pine Ridge Road (unincorporated Collier County), Florida. B. The approximate western half of the site is currently zoned RSF -4 and occupied with older homes and the approximate eastern half of the site is currently zoned C -1 and occupied with older structures and legal non- conforming C -3, C -5, and light industrial land uses. The subject property is proposed to be rezoned to PUD for commercial land uses. 1.5 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION The project is located within the Gordon River Drainage Basin as shown on the Collier County Drainage Atlas. Runoff from the site will flow southerly to the Gordon River System. The project will be designed for a 3 -day, 25 -year storm event for minimum road crown elevations and a 3 -day, 100 -year discharge for minimum finished floor elevations, in accordance with the Rules of the South Florida Water Management District. 3 8A I M, Estimated site elevations, as provided on the U.S.G.S. map, range from 12 feet NGVD to 14 feet NGVD, with an average existing grade of 13 feet NGVD. The site is within Flood Zone 'W', per the Flood Insurance Rate Maps. Per Collier County Soil Legend dated January 1990, the soil type found within the limits of the property is #32 — Urban land. The site has scattered slash pines, australian pines, ficus, oaks, and exotics, such as melaleuca trees. Except for the melaleuca trees, all of these trees were likely planted by the property owners. 1.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Goodlette Corners PUD is a project comprised of 8.52 acres designated for commercial land uses, consisting of: office, service, and low to moderate intensity retail land uses. 1.7 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the " Goodlette Corners Planned Unit Development Ordinance ". 4 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1 PURPOSE 8A �y The purpose of this Section is to delineate and generally describe the project plan of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land uses of the tracts included in the project, as well as other project relationships. 2.2 GENERAL A. Regulations for development of the Goodlette Corners PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document, PUD - Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate which authorizes the construction of improvements, such as but not limited to Final Subdivision Plat, Final Site Development Plan, Excavation Permit and Preliminary Work Authorization. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the Land Development Code shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. C. All conditions imposed and graphic material presented depicting restrictions for the development of the Goodlette Corners PUD shall become part of the regulations which govern the manner in which the PUD site may be developed. D. All applicable regulations, unless specifically waived through a variance or separate provision provided for in this PUD Document, shall remain in full force and effect. E. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Division 3.15 Adequate Public Facilities of the Collier County Land Development Code at the earliest, or next, to occur of either Final Site Development Plan approval, Final Plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this development. E 8p �, I 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT DENSITY OR INTENSITY OF LAND USES Commercial uses are limited to 8.52 acres. 2.4 RELATED PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS A. The general configuration of the land uses are illustrated graphically on Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan, which constitutes the required PUD Development Plan. Subdivision of the property and the development of the land shall be in compliance with the PUD Master Plan, Division 3.2 Subdivisions of the Land Development Code, and the platting laws of the State of Florida. B. The provisions of Division 3.3, Site Development Plans of the Land Development Code, when applicable, shall apply to the development of all platted tracts, or parcels of land as provided in said Division 3.3 prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development order. C. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructural improvements regarding any dedications to Collier County and the methodology for providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities. 2.5 MODEL UNITS AND SALES FACILITIES A. Temporary sales trailers and construction trailers can be placed on the site after Site Development Plan approval and prior to the recording of Subdivision Plats, subject to the other requirements of Section 2.6.33.3 of the Land Development Code. 2.6 PROVISION FOR OFF -SITE REMOVAL OF EARTHEN MATERIAL The excavation of earthen material and its stock - piling in preparation of water management facilities or to otherwise develop water bodies is hereby permitted. Off -site disposal is also hereby permitted subject to the following conditions. A. Excavation activities shall comply with the definition of a "Development Excavation" pursuant to Section 3.5.5.1.3 of the Land Development Code, whereby off -site removal shall be limited to 10% of the total volume excavated but not to exceed 20,000 cubic yards. B. All other provisions of Division 3.5 Excavation of the Land Development Code shall apply. 0 3.1 3.2 3.3 SECTION IV COMMERCIAL AREAS PLAN PURPOSE 8 � The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for the Commercial Areas as shown on Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan. GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as Commercial Areas on the PUD Master Plan are intended to provide a variety of commercial, financial, health, and office uses. Commercial Areas are limited to a maximum of 8.52 acres. PERMITTED USES No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Amusement and Recreation Services (groups 7911, 7933, 7991, 7993 only for indoor video game arcade and indoor coin - operated amusement machine, 7997, 7999 only for bicycle rental, ice skating rink operation, indoor slot -car track, and miniature golf course. 2. Apparel and Accessory Stores (groups 5611 - 5699). 3. Auto Supply Stores (group 5531). 4. Auto Rental and Services (groups 7514, 7515, 7549 lubricating service and window tinting both limited to only automobiles and trucks of 1 ton or less capacity). 5. Business Services (groups 7311, 7313, 7322 - 7338, 7361, 7371 - 7384, 7389 only for service of fire extinguishers, interior decorating /design, mapmaking, notary public, paralegal service, Postal Service contract stations, and swimming pool cleaning/ maintenance). 6. Depository and Non - Depository Institutions (groups 6021 - 6199). FA 8A 'd 7. Eating Places (group 5812) and Drinking Places (group 5813 only cocktail lounges in conjunction with a restaurant.) 8. Educational Services (groups 8211 - 8249 (no exterior instruction of motorized equipment), 8299). 9. Food Stores (groups 5411 - 5499). 10. General Merchandise Stores (groups 5311 - 5399). 11. Health Services (groups 8011 - 8099). 12. Holding and Other Investment Offices (groups 6712 - 6799). 13. Home Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment Stores (groups 5712 - 5736). 14. Hotels and Motels (group 7011). 15. Insurance Carriers, Agents, Brokers, and Services (groups 6311 - 6399, 6411). 16. Legal Services (group 8111). 17. Membership Organizations (groups 8611, 8621, 8641 - 8661). 18. Miscellaneous Repair (groups 7622 - 7631, 7641 only for antique furniture and home accessory repair and restoration, 7699 but only bicycle repair, camera repair, locksmiths, luggage repair, medical/ dental instrument repair, musical instrument repair, piano repair, saw /knife sharpening service, and custom picture framing). 19. Miscellaneous Retail (groups 5912, 5932 (antiques only), 5941 - 5949, 5992, 5994 - 5999 (except auction rooms, monument and tombstone sales). 20. Motion Pictures, Movie Theaters, and Video Tape Rental (groups 7812, 7819, 7832, and 7841). 21. Museums and Art Galleries (group 8412). 22. Paint, Glass, Wallpaper, Hardware, and Garden Supply (groups 5231 - 5261). 8 O. 23. Personal Services (group 7212 dry- cleaning and laundry pickup stations only, 7215, 7217, 7219 - 7291, 7299 (only car title and tag service, diet workshops, tuxedo rental, massage parlor, and tanning salon). 24. Professional Offices, Research, and Management Consulting Services (groups 8711 - 8743, 8748). 25. Public Administration (groups 9111 - 9222, 9224 - 9661). 26. Real Estate Agents and Managers (groups 6512, 6531 - 6552). 27. Security and Commodity Dealers (groups 6211 - 6289). 28. Social Services (groups 8322 (only adult day care services, counseling services, and senior citizens associations), 8351). 29. Travel Agencies (group 4724). 30. Veterinary Services (group 0742 for household pets only and without any overnight boarding or outside kennels). 31. Warehousing (group 4225 for self- storage only with no outdoor storage, no on -site maintenance /assembly /manufacturing activities, no metal roll -up garage doors, and buildings designed with architectural elements similar to office buildings.) 32. Any other commercial use or professional service, which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the Permitted Uses within this PUD Document. 2. Cocktail Lounge (group 5813 only in conjunction with Eating Places) 3. Caretaker's residences subject to Section 2.6.16 of the Collier County Land Development Code, with the principal entry through the commercial building. 9 SA ".. C. Non - Conforming Uses 1. Existing residential uses on the Western Portion shall be considered "legal non - conforming uses" based on the date of adoption of this ordinance and shall thereafter meet the requirements of DIVISION1.8. NONCONFORMITIES. All existing residential uses on the Western Portion shall become in compliance with this PUD Document, upon the issuance of the first building permit for redevelopment of their lot within the Western Portion. 2. All existing uses on the Eastern Portion shall be considered "legal non - conforming uses" based on the date of adoption of this ordinance shall thereafter meet the requirements of DIVISION1.8. NONCONFORMITIES; however, the provisions of all prior Collier County Resolutions relating to approval of non - conforming use changes on the Eastern Portion shall remain in full force and effect. 3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Minimum Lot Area: Ten thousand (10,000) square feet. B. Minimum Lot Width: Ninety (90) feet. C. Minimum Yards: (1) Principal structures: (a) Front Yards Along Goodlette Road - Fifty (50) feet. (b) Front Yards Along Pine Ridge Road - Twenty-five (25) feet. (c) Rear Yards Internal to the PUD - Fifteen (15) feet. (d) Side Yards Internal to the PUD - One -half (1/2) the building height as measured from the closest exterior building wall with a minimum of seven and one -half (7.5) feet. 10 8A (e) Rear and Side Yards Abutting External Commercial Land - One -half (1/2) the building height as measured from the closest exterior building wall with a minimum of fifteen (15) feet. (f) Rear and Side Yards Abutting External Residential Land - One (1) foot for each foot of building height as measured from the closest exterior building wall with a minimum of twenty -five (25) feet. (2) Accessory Structures: Setbacks shall be as required by Division 2.6.2 of the Land Development Code in effect at time of building permit application. D. Distance Between Principal Structures on the Same Parcel: One -half the sum of the building heights measured by the closest exterior building walls with a minimum of fifteen (15) feet. E. Minimum Floor Area: Seven hundred (700) square feet for the principal structure on the first habitable floor. F. Maximum Height: Forty -five (45) feet and further limited to a maximum of three (3) stories. G. Off - Street Parking and Loading Requirements: As required by Division 2.3 of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. H. Bufferinq Requirements: (1) A fifteen (15) foot wide Type "D" Buffer shall be provided along Pine Ridge Road, with the landscaping as required in Section 2.4.7.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code. (2) A ten (10) foot wide buffer shall be provided along Goodlette Road, with the landscaping as required in Section 2.2.21.5.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code. it 8A I .. 1s (3) A ten (10) foot wide buffer with Type "B" screening requirements shall be provided where the subject property abuts the internal lake and graveyard, with the landscaping as required in Section 2.4.7.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code. (4) Buffering between two (2) internal commercial parcels of the PUD, shall be a five (5) foot wide buffer along each parcel to be developed, with trees spaced a minimum of thirty (30) feet on- center and a single row of shrubs spaced a minimum of four (4) feet on- center. Such trees and shrubs shall meet the requirements of Section 2.4.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Signs Signs shall be permitted as described in Section 2.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 12 SECTION IV DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 4.1 PURPOSE Unic-1 The purpose of this Section is to set forth the commitments for the development of this project. 4.2 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with Final Site Development Plans, Final Subdivision Plans and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this PUD, in effect at the time of Final Plat, Final Site Development Plan approval or building permit application as the case may be. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the official County Land Development Code shall apply to this project even if the land within the PUD is not to be platted. The developer, his successor and assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this document. The developer, his successor or assignee, shall follow the PUD Master Plan and the regulations of this PUD as adopted and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor in title or assignee is subject to the commitments within this Agreement. 4.3 PUD MASTER PLAN A. Exhibit "A", PUD Master Plan illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed area, lot or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as Final Platting or Site Development Plan approval. Subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code, amendments may be made from time to time. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all common areas in the project. 13 8A "00 4.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT /MONITORING REPORT A Site Development Plan shall be submitted per County regulations in effect at time of site plan submittal. The project is projected for completion in one (1) or two (2) phases. A. The landowners shall proceed and be governed according to the time limits pursuant to Section 2.7.3.4 of the Land Development Code. B. Monitoring Report: An annual monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Section 2.7.3.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 4.5 ENGINEERING A. This project shall be required to meet all County Ordinances in effect at the time final construction documents are submitted for development approval. B. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with appropriate provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code, Division 3.2. Subdivisions. 4.6 WATER MANAGEMENT A. A copy of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Surface Water Permit Application shall be sent to Collier County Development Services with the SDP submittal. B. Permits may be required for filling in a portion of the on -site lake, cleaning the lake, and/or re- sculpturing it. C. Lake setbacks for the existing lake from the perimeter of the PUD to the south shall not be required as this lake is already located along a portion of the southern PUD boundary. Lake setbacks for any new lakes may be reduced to twenty -five (25) feet where a six (6) foot high fence or suitable substantial barrier is erected. 4.7 UTILITIES A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission and interim water and/or sewage treatment facilities to serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with Collier 14 8A ^I� County Ordinance No. 88 -76, as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. 4.8 TRAFFIC A. The applicant shall be responsible for the installation of arterial level street lighting for any commercial project entrance onto Pine Ridge Road or Goodlette Road, prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy or Compliance. B. Drainage shall not be permitted to discharge directly into any off -site roadway drainage system but may discharge into the canal along the western side of Goodlette Road with necessary permits. C. Road Impact Fees shall be paid in accordance with Ordinance 92 -22, as amended, and shall be paid at the time building permits are issued unless otherwise approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 4.9 PLANNING A. Pursuant to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the Land Development Code, if during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity a historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted. B. All buildings, lighting, signage, landscaping and visible architecture infrastructure shall be architecturally and aesthetically unified, and shall comply with the Architectural and Site Design Guidelines and Standards of the Land Development Code. Said unified architectural theme shall include a similar architectural design and use of similar materials and colors throughout all of the buildings and signs to be erected on the site. Landscaping and streetscape materials shall also be similar in design throughout the site. A conceptual design master plan shall be submitted concurrent with the first application for Site Development Plan approval depicting these standards. 4.10 ENVIRONMENTAL A. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic -free) plan for the site, shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to Final Site Development Plan /Construction Plan approval for all parcels included on that project. 15 B. A minimum of thirty (30) percent open space of the gross site area, as described in Section 2.6.32 of the Land Development Code, shall be provided for this commercial project. 16 t x Mg -L65 (ti,6) VA MC -L69 (1i6) 73NONd emw li 1.7wN i mils 'awyu O6 a v P out MMMAII-OMH zrnrD 'JNI `OM UMOM NOSUM N —Y 1.3 K N m= A Nu h h �I �g .V. IMIHX3 NIY1919mcrw S03WAM 3113'IM I Q ot i �sld �P a� Q QL it I I I 33` q i �I �1 � A pwJ 6tiMx3 !.. Z N f � i � . . — W o z � � Q Lu W � Q z 33K� � `rNz W W Wa Q Z F) W (W U v t x Mg -L65 (ti,6) VA MC -L69 (1i6) 73NONd emw li 1.7wN i mils 'awyu O6 a v P out MMMAII-OMH zrnrD 'JNI `OM UMOM NOSUM N —Y 1.3 K N m= A Nu h h �I �g .V. IMIHX3 NIY1919mcrw S03WAM 3113'IM I Q ot i �sld �P a� Q QL it I I I 33` q i �I �1 � A pwJ 6tiMx3 !.. tq I , I I I 'hill; litma .cove ,1uGwjwffiT 3NW 731W(�1NYN/1Y15aw 0 o- V9$ �z x> �OWyy11 3�a? eQag c� g22ti �QQW Z N f � i � . . — W � z W W Wa ¢¢ W os W I y IT V I tq I , I I I 'hill; litma .cove ,1uGwjwffiT 3NW 731W(�1NYN/1Y15aw 0 o- V9$ �z x> �OWyy11 3�a? eQag c� g22ti �QQW Z N f � i � . . — 8A "11, LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS The East 1/2 of the East 1/2 of Lot 51, Naples Improvement Company's Little Farms according to a map or plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 2, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, excepting the East 125 feet thereof for one -half of a right -of- way and a grave plot described in O.R. Book 343 Page 688, and. Lots 1 - 9, Presque Isle, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 48, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, less the north 15 feet thereof, and The North 105 feet of the East 125 feet of the West half of Lot 51, less the North 15 feet for road right -of -way, Naples Improvement Company's Little Farms, per plat in Plat Book 2, Page 2, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. 8 A EXHIBIT "C" Property Owners' Names /Addresses (see Lot Numbers/Letters Shown on PUD Master Plan) 3.76 -Acre parcel at SW corner of Goodlette Rd./Pine Ridge Road - George W. Shepard & Son, Inc., P.O. Box 202, Naples, FL 34106 Most of Lot 1 - Roy Steven & Teresa Shepard, 1320 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34108 Lot 2 and Some of Lot 1 - Amy Ashby - 1298 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34108 Lot 3 & 4 - Edward F. McCarthey & Doris J. Lewis, 94 Second St. S., Naples, FL 34102 Lot 5 - Carolyn A. Marsh & Mary S. Booton, 12774 Hunters Ridge Dr., Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Lot 6 - Robert K. Munn, 2390 Kings Lake Blvd., Naples, FL 34112 Lot 7 - Jacqueline E. Daniel & Elizabeth J. Krupp, 1228 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34108 Lot 8 - Bobby L. & Roberta M. Bozeman, 128 McCallister Rd., Crawfordville, FL 32327 Lot 9 (S) - Dugan J. Porter Et Ux, 1185 Pine Ridge Court, Naples, FL 34108 Lot 9 (M) - Dugan J. Porter, P.O. Box 10039, Naples, FL 34101 Lot 9 (l) - James R. & Deborah Lawrence, 4580 Fifteenth Ave. SW, Naples, FL 34116 Lot X - Steven Thomas Stresen- Reuter, 585 Lakeland Ave., Naples, FL 34110 8A IM January 16, 2002 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD- 2000 -22 Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced petition on Sunday, January 27, 2002 and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Joanne R. Allen Deputy Clerk Enclosure Account: 113 - 138312- 649110 8p NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, February 12, 2002, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91 -102, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 9515N; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "RSF -4" and "C -1" to "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS GOODLETTE CORNERS PUD LOCATED IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 8.52 + /- ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Petition PUD- 2000 -22, D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, of Q. Grady Minor Associates, P.A., representing Pine Ridge Redevelopment Group, requesting a rezone from "RSF -4" and "C -1" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as Goodlette Corners PUD for commercial uses, for property located on the southwest corner of Goodlette Road and Pine Ridge Road. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. 8A I I Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s /JoAnne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) E Cl U y Dwight E. Brock Clerk January 16, 2002 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101 -3044 Pine Ridge Redevelopment Group Amy Ashby 1298 Pine Ridge Road Naples, Florida 34108 8A 'M CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD- 2000 -22 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 12, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, January 27, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK '� 4gc� oanne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk Enclosure o��E CIIpCGlT COMM Dwight E. Brock Clerk January 16, 2002 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COWER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101 -3044 Mr. D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor Associates, P.A. 10911 Bonita Beach Road Suite 105 Bonita Springs, Florida 33923 8A I'l CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD- 2000 -22 Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 12, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, January 27, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK oanne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk Enclosure Joanne R. Allen 8A 1.1 _ To: paperrell @naplesnews.com Subject: Petition PUD- 2000 -22 Pam: Please advertise the attached Public Hearing on Sunday January 27, 2002. This is the last one for today. Again, thanks so much for all of your help. JoAnne PU D- 2000- 22.doc 11� PUD- 2000- 22.doc Joanne R. Allen 8A �� From: System Administrator [postmaster @naplesnews.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:32 PM To: Joanne R. Allen Subject: Delivered: Petition PUD- 2000 -22 LLJ Petition P U D- 2000 -22 <<Petition PUD- 2000 -22>> Your message To: 'paperrell @naplesnews.com' Subject: Petition PUD- 2000 -22 Sent: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:38:12 -0500 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Perrell, Pamela on Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:32:13 -0500 1 Naples )&iLy dews Naples, F1 34102 affidavit of Publication Naples DmAy News 1304R0 OF COUtITY ':_AMISS: )NERS CHR , 'S MOR FON !10 BO), 4"3016 NAPLES FL 34-01.10V, REFERENCE: UnMu 113V331?64A SIB385475S PLIU-2000-22 ?'OIICE 0 �Laxa of L.,ri& Ccuni,v f Ct.4.L`ie, Pefoie tin-, undrrsig,:a aut!orit,, e,sc _Uy %ppeired B. :aorta. ,hn on ontf. say's r.bt she serves as the Assizcant Corporate Secretary of the Naples �ait.y , 4z-:r, i daily newspa,=er published at Naples, i,., cc'.Lie, Coun4y. Florida: that thq attached copy o: a(ver"sing was published in sa4d rie.fspaper cr, datkz Lilt C". Affrj;jfjt further "ys that the said Naples Daily ;.ews is A rewrMaper publishes? at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that th, said ,,�w.pape., n&s tier,-.oc•fore bee, continuously pjbLi0_,0 in said Collier County, Florida, each day and has been entered as se-,ond cLa::s WL mazztei, at the lost office in Naples, in said Col L• Cf-Unty, FLoriva, f-jr a perio(I of , year i) t precAino, the airs` publication of the at�achad copy of advert i't;enent; ard af-f;,,t further se,,ts Ciat he has n3itEe:• paid nor pro'11*sed any person, firm or carp, rat any discount, rrabe,te, commission R r refund f,,,r the purpose of sc;urinq JAs advei,tisemen` for pubVction in the said newspaper. PVBLISHE, ON: 0,127 ALi SPACE: 140.00L, '_NCd 1`1LED W* 0-1, 28102 Signature of Af4iant '� xid Subscribed re me thi40— &1y of Perso! - L ty kn.,%vn k j Pi Donna Chesney My Commission DD056336 Explr@s September 11, 2006 TO are tton. tv I Vitt Z) 3p,' a n INV i the ing a re- F4" and 11PUD" Develop- 8A "� All dIVIdW SPOMS V#111 Do limited to 5 minutes on any Item. The selection of an Individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group Is encouraaed. If recognized by the Chair- man, a spokesperson for a group or orgMW- anization may be WI 10 min- utes to speck on an Ifern. Persons wishing to have written or arophic materials Included In the Board agenda packets must submit sold material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the. respective public hearing. in any case, written materlals 111- tended, to be considered by the Board shall be sub- mlited to the appropriate County doff a minimum ofsevehearing. n days prior to the public All materl- 61 used in presentations before the Board will be- come a� permanent part of ffm r Any person who decid- es to appeal a decision of the Board will need a re- cord of the proceedings , pertaining thereto -and BROCK, kneR.Allen, and the ORDINANCE NO. 02- 0 8 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 91 -102 THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBERED 9515N; BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "RSF4" AND "C -1" TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS GOODLETTE CORNERS PUD LOCATED IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 8.52± ACRES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, William L. Hoover, AICP, of Hoover Planning and Development, Inc., representing Pine Ridge Redevelopment Group, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from "RSF -4" and "C -1" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the Goodlette Corners PUD Document, attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and incorporated by reference herein. The Official Zoning Atlas Map numbered 9515N, as described in Ordinance Number 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code, is hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this o7 day of a ' ATTEST: =` BROCK, CLERK Attest t4 Cha1rou': Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency '. Marjorie*. Student Assistant County Attorney 9/admin/PUD- 2000- 22 /CB /im BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN -1- "8A ' GOOBLETTE CORNERS PUB A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PREPARED FOR: PINE RIDGE REDEVELOPMENT GROUP C/O AMY AS H BY 1298 PINE RIDGE ROAD NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108 and ROBERT SOUDAN 800 FRONTAGE ROAD NORTHFIELD, ILLINOIS 60093 PREPARED BY: D.WAYNE ARNOLD, AICP Q. GRADY MINOR AND ASSOCIATES, P.A. 3800 VIA DEL REY BONITA SPRINGS, FLORIDA 34135 And RICHARD D. YOVANOVICH GOODLETTE, COLEMAN & JOHNSON, P.A. 4001 N. TAMIAMI TRAIL, SUITE 300 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34103 DATE FILED December 29, 2000 DATE REVISED January 16, 2002 DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC January 3, 2002 DATE APPROVED BY BCC February 26, 2002 ORDINANCE NUMBER 2002 -08 EXHIBIT "A" 8A TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF EXHIBITS STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE 1 SECTION 1 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 3 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 5 SECTION III COMMERCIAL AREAS PLAN 8 SECTION IV DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 15 11 "R4 't LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT "A" PUD MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "C" LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS EXHIBIT "D" CONCEPTUAL ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATION ui 8A -,4 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of approximately 8.52± acres of property in Collier County, as a Planned Unit Development to be known as Goodlette Corners PUD will be in compliance with the planning goals and objectives of Collier County as set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan. The commercial facilities of the Goodlette Corners PUD will be consistent with the growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives for the following reasons: The subject property is within the Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Sub - District as shown on the Future Land Use Map and meets the requirements of the Office and In -fill Commercial Sub - District of the Urban - Mixed Use District in the Future Land Use Element. The Future Land Use Element permits commercial land uses on the subject land since the project meets the requirements of the Office and In -fill Commercial Sub - District by: fronting on a collector or arterial roadway, abutting commercial zoning along its western boundary, the depth of proposed commercial uses does not exceed the depth of the abutting commercial uses, the project will be served by public water and sewer, the project will be compatible with existing and permitted future land uses on surrounding properties, and the subject land area is less than twelve acres. 2. The subject property's location in relation to existing or proposed community facilities and services permits the development's commercial intensity as described in Objective 2 of the Future Land Use Element. 3. The project development's proposed uses and perimeter buffering will allow it to be compatible and complimentary to surrounding land uses, including an existing home that comprises part of its western boundary, as required in Policy 5.4 of the Future Land Use Element. 4. Improvements are planned to be in compliance with applicable sections of the Collier County Land Development Code as set forth in Objective 3 of the Future Land Use Element. 5. The project development is planned to protect the functioning of natural drainage features and natural groundwater aquifer recharge areas as described in Objective 1.5 of the Drainage Sub - Element of the Public Facilities Element. 6. All final local development orders for this project are subject to Division 3.15, Adequate Public Facilities, of the Collier County Land Development Code. 7. The Goodlette Corners PUD meets the intent of Policies 4.4 and 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element, which encourage the Board of County Commissioners •1 w to consider redevelopment plans for specific areas, including Pine Ridge Road between U.S. 41 and Goodlette -Frank Road. 8. The easternmost property zoned C -1 was reviewed under the Zoning Reevaluation Program and is deemed consistent by Future Land Use Element Map 10. Pursuant to Future Land Use Element Policy 4.7, the easternmost property is allowed to make changes to the intensity of uses in order to encourage re- development. 2 SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE 8A The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name of Goodlette Corners PUD. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION The subject property being 8.52± acres, is located in Section 15, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, and is fully described as on Exhibit "B ". 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The subject property is owned by numerous property owners. A complete breakdown is shown on Exhibit "C ". 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA A. The subject property is located at the southwest corner of the intersection of Goodlette -Frank Road and Pine Ridge Road (unincorporated Collier County), Florida. B. The approximate western half of the site is currently zoned RSF -4 and occupied with older homes and the approximate eastern half of the site is currently zoned C -1 and occupied with older structures and legal non- conforming C -3, C -5, and light industrial land uses. The subject property is proposed to be rezoned to PUD for commercial land uses. 1.5 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION The project is located within the Gordon River Drainage Basin as shown on the Collier County Drainage Atlas. Runoff from the site will flow southerly to the Gordon River System. The project will be designed for a 3 -day, 25 -year storm event for minimum road crown elevations and a 3 -day, 100 -year discharge for minimum finished floor elevations, in accordance with the Rules of the South Florida Water Management District. Estimated site elevations, as provided on the U.S.G.S. map, range from 12 feet NGVD to 14 feet NGVD, with an average existing grade of 13 feet NGVD. The site is within Flood Zone "X ", per the Flood Insurance Rate Maps. 3 8 A" Per Collier County Soil Legend dated January 1990, the soil type found within the limits of the property is #32 — Urban land. The site has scattered slash pines, australian pines, ficus, oaks, and exotics, such as melaleuca trees. Except for the melaleuca trees, all of these trees were likely planted by the property owners. 1.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Goodlette Corners PUD is a project comprised of 8.52 acres designated for commercial land uses, consisting of: office, service, and low to moderate intensity retail land uses. 1.7 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the " Goodlette Corners Planned Unit Development Ordinance ". 4 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1 PURPOSE �8A The purpose of this Section is to delineate and generally describe the project plan of development, relationships to applicable County ordinances, the respective land uses of the tracts included in the project, as well as other project relationships. 2.2 GENERAL A. Regulations for development of the Goodlette Corners PUD shall be in accordance with the contents of this document, PUD - Planned Unit Development District and other applicable sections and parts of the Collier County Land Development Code and Growth Management Plan in effect at the time of issuance of any development order to which said regulations relate which authorizes the construction of improvements, such as but not limited to Final Subdivision Plat, Final Site Development Plan, Excavation Permit and Preliminary Work Authorization. Where these regulations fail to provide developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the Land Development Code shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. C. All conditions imposed and graphic material presented depicting restrictions for the development of the Goodlette Corners PUD shall become part of the regulations, which govern the manner in which the PUD site may be developed. D. All applicable regulations, unless specifically waived through a variance or separate provision provided for in this PUD Document, shall remain in full force and effect. E. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Division 3.15, Adequate Public Facilities of the Collier County Land Development Code at the earliest, or next, to occur of either Final Site Development Plan approval, Final Plat approval, or building permit issuance applicable to this development. 2.3 all 2.5 2.6 � 8A DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT DENSITY OR INTENSITY OF LAND USES Commercial uses are limited to 8.52 acres. RELATED PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS A. The general configuration of the land uses is illustrated graphically on Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan, which constitutes the required PUD Development Plan. Subdivision of the property and the development of the land shall be in compliance with the PUD Master Plan, Division 3.2, Subdivisions of the Land Development Code, and the platting laws of the State of Florida. B. The provisions of Division 3.3, Site Development Plans of the Land Development Code, when applicable, shall apply to the development of all platted tracts, or parcels of land as provided in said Division 3.3 prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development order. C. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructure improvements regarding any dedications to Collier County and the methodology for providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities. MODEL UNITS AND SALES FACILITIES A. Temporary sales trailers and construction trailers can be placed on the site after Site Development Plan approval and prior to the recording of Subdivision Plats, subject to the other requirements of Section 2.6.33.3 of the Land Development Code. PROVISION FOR OFF -SITE REMOVAL OF EARTHEN MATERIAL The excavation of earthen material and its stockpiling in preparation of water management facilities or to otherwise develop water bodies are hereby permitted. Off -site disposal is also hereby permitted subject to the following conditions. A. Excavation activities shall comply with the definition of a "Development Excavation" pursuant to Section 3.5.5.1.3 of the Land Development Code, whereby off -site removal shall be limited to 10% of the total volume excavated but not to exceed 20,000 cubic yards. B. All other provisions of Division 3.5, Excavation of the Land Development Code shall apply. 6 I �-A 8A � 2.7 DESIGN GUIDELINES AND STANDARDS The site will be a master planned site having common and shared vehicular and pedestrian access throughout. All buildings constructed within the Goodlette Corners PUD shall be subject to Division 2.8 of the Collier County LDC, Architectural and Site Design Standards and Guidelines. All buildings throughout the project shall have compatible design elements. Buildings shall contain unifying elements such as roof treatments, building materials, color scheme, landscaping and signage. Rear building elevations shall have similar design treatments as provided on front elevations. In addition to the above criteria, the indoor climate controlled self- storage facility shall be designed so that no external storage unit door faces Pine Ridge Road, and it shall be constructed in conformance to the architectural details shown in Exhibit D. 2.8 CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS TO PUD DOCUMENT OR MASTER PLAN Changes and amendments may be made to this PUD Ordinance and PUD Master Plan as provided in Section 2.7.3.5 of the LDC. PUD amendments having the effect of modifying a development standard, permitted use, development commitment or PUD master plan that is specific to an individual development tract(s), may be applied for by the owner(s) of that development tract(s). The amendment(s) that are approved shall only apply to the tract(s) for which the amendment(s) were applied for and not to any tract(s) for which amendments were not applied for. SECTION III COMMERCIAL AREAS PLAN 3.1 PURPOSE 8A The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for the Commercial Areas as shown on Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan. 3.2 GENERAL DESCRIPTION Areas designated as Commercial Areas on the PUD Master Plan are intended to provide a variety of commercial, financial, health, and office uses. Commercial Areas are limited to a maximum of 8.52 acres. 3.3 PERMITTED USES F.. No building, structure or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures: 1. Amusement and Recreation Services (groups 7911(excluding discotheques and dance halls) and 7991). 2. Apparel and Accessory Stores (groups 5611 - 5699). 3. Auto Supply Stores (group 5531, only automobile accessory dealers shall be permitted). 4. Auto Rental and Services (group, 7515). 5. Business Services (groups 7311, 7313, 7322 - 7338, 7361, 7371 - 7384, 7389 only: interior decorating /design, mapmaking, notary public, paralegal service, and Postal Service contract stations). 6. Depository and Non - Depository Institutions (groups 6021 - 6199). 8 8A 7. Eating Places (group 5812 except, industrial feeding, contract feeding and commissary restaurants) and Drinking Places (group 5813 cocktail lounges only in conjunction with a restaurant.) Subject to the following restrictions: a). Fast food and drive - through restaurants shall be prohibited in the PUD. b.) Eating places shall be permitted in Areas A and B and further restricted to only those establishments primarily involved in preparation of breakfast, lunch or catered items with customer service hours between 6:00 a.m. and 6:00 p.m. c) Full- service sit -down restaurants are permitted in Area C as shown on the Master Plan. Alcoholic beverage service, other than that provided in conjunction with dining, shall be restricted to an area not exceeding 15% of the restaurant's square footage. Alcoholic beverage service shall not be provided beyond the normal hours of operation of the restaurant's full - service food preparation and dining activities. 8. Educational Services (groups 8231 - 8249 (no exterior instruction of motorized equipment), 8299). 9. Food Stores (groups 5411 - 5499). 10. General Merchandise Stores (groups 5331- 5399). 11. Health Services (groups 8011 — 8059, 8071 —8092, and 8099). 12. Holding and Other Investment Offices (groups 6712 - 6799). 13. Home Furniture, Furnishings and Equipment Stores (groups 5712 - 5736). 14. Insurance Carriers, Agents, Brokers, and Services (groups 6311 - 6399, 6411). 15. Legal Services (group 8111). 16. Membership Organizations (groups 8611, 8621, 8641 - 8651). 17. Miscellaneous Repair (groups 7622, 7629 - 7631, 7641 only for antique furniture and home accessory repair and restoration, 7699 9 8A " 7 but only bicycle repair, camera repair, locksmiths, luggage repair, medical/ dental instrument repair, musical instrument repair, piano repair, saw /knife sharpening service, and custom picture framing). 18. Miscellaneous Retail (groups 5912, 5921, 5932 (antiques only), 5941 - 5949, 5992, 5994 - 5999 (except auction rooms, monument and tombstone sales). 19. Video Tape Rental (7841). 20. Museums and Art Galleries (group 8412). 21. Paint, Glass, Wallpaper, Hardware, and Garden Supply (groups 5231 - 5261). 22. Personal Services (group 7212 dry- cleaning and laundry pickup stations only) (7217, 7219 - 7291, 7299 (only car title and tag service, diet workshops, tuxedo rental, and tanning salon). 23. Professional Offices, Research, and Management Consulting Services (groups 8711 —8721, 8732 - 8743, 8748). 24. Public Administration (groups 9111 - 9222, 9229 - 9661). 25. Real Estate Agents and Managers (groups 6512, 6531 - 6552). 26. Security and Commodity Dealers (groups 6211 - 6289). 27. Social Services (groups 8322 (only adult day care services, counseling services, and senior citizens associations), 8351). 28. Travel Agencies (group 4724). 29. Veterinary Services (group 0742 for household pets only and without any overnight boarding or outside kennels). 30. Warehousing (group 4225 indoor climate controlled self storage with no outdoor storage, no on -site maintenance, assembly, manufacturing activities, and no metal roll -up garage doors.) All uses permitted in Area A with the exception of indoor climate controlled self storage. 10 rgp AREA C: All uses permitted in Areas A and B, except indoor climate controlled self storage. AREA A, B & C: Community Park B. Accessory Uses: 1. Uses and structures that are accessory and incidental to the Permitted Uses within this PUD Document. 2. Cocktail Lounge (group 5813 only in conjunction with Eating Places) 3. Caretaker's residences subject to Section 2.6.16 of the Collier County Land Development Code, with the principal entry through the commercial building. C. Non - Conforming Uses 1. Existing residential uses in Areas "A" and "B" of the PUD Master Plan shall be considered "legal non - conforming uses" based on the date of adoption of this Ordinance and shall thereafter meet the requirements of DIVISION1.8. NONCON FORM ITIES. Each residential use in Areas "A" and "B" shall become in compliance with this PUD Document, upon the issuance of the first building permit for redevelopment of that lot within Areas "A" and "B" of the PUD. 2. All existing uses in Area "C" shall be considered "legal non- conforming uses" based on the date of adoption of this Ordinance shall thereafter meet the requirements of DIVISION1.8. NONCON FORM ITIES; however, the provisions of all prior Collier County Resolutions relating to approval of non - conforming use changes in Area "C" shall remain in full force and effect. All non- conforming uses shall cease upon the issuance of the first building permit in Area "C" of the PUD for any permitted use listed in Section 3.3 of this PUD document. In the event that prior to redevelopment of Area C, the County elects to relocate Area C's access point on Goodlette -Frank Road to the location shown on the PUD Master Plan, any non - conforming structures or uses impacted by such access relocation may be relocated and rebuilt within Area C notwithstanding any other provision of this PUD or the LDC to the contrary. 11 `8 A � 3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. Minimum Lot Area: Ten thousand (10,000) square feet. B. Minimum Lot Width: Ninety (90) feet. C. Minimum Yards: (1) Principal structures: (a) Front Yards Along Goodlette -Frank Road - Fifty (50) feet. (b) Front Yards Along Pine Ridge Road - Twenty -five (25) feet. (c) Rear Yards Internal to the PUD - Fifteen (15) feet. (d) Side Yards Internal to the PUD - One -half (1/2) the building height as measured from the closest exterior building wall with a minimum of fifteen (15) feet. (e) Side Yards Abutting External Commercial Land - Twenty -five (25) feet. (f) Side Yards Abutting External Residential Land- Twenty -five (25) feet (g) Rear Yards Abutting External Residential Land - Thirty -five (35) feet. (2) Accessory Structures: Unless otherwise noted herein, setbacks shall be as required by Division 2.6.2 of the Land Development Code in effect at time of building permit application. D. Distance Between Principal Structures on the Same Parcel: 12 E F. G 8A One -half the sum of the building heights measured by the closest exterior building walls with a minimum of fifteen (15) feet. Minimum Floor Area: Seven - hundred (700) square feet for the principal structure on the first habitable floor. Maximum Height: Forty -five (45) feet, not to exceed three (3) stories. The 45 -foot maximum height shall be inclusive of roof treatments and architectural embellishments. Off - Street Parking and Loading Requirements: As required by Division 2.3 of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of building permit application. H. Buffering Requirements: (1) A fifteen (15) foot wide Type "D" Buffer shall be provided along Pine Ridge Road, with the landscaping as required in Section 2.4.7.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code. (2) A ten (10) foot wide Type "D" buffer shall be provided along Goodlette -Frank Road, including along the west side of the off -site graveyard with the landscaping standards as required in Section 2.2.21.5.1 of the Collier County Land Development Code. This buffer shall contain canopy trees, the number of which shall be calculated based on a minimum spacing of twenty -five (25) feet on center. All canopy trees within this buffer shall be a minimum of 12- feet high at time of planting. (3) Concurrent with each phase of development, the developer shall be required to provide along the southern PUD Boundary a fifteen (15) foot wide, Type "B" Buffer. The buffer shall consist of an 8 -foot high pre -cast opaque concrete (or similar material) fence. The fence shall be off -set from the southern property line by a minimum of 7- feet. Low -level landscaping shall be installed on the residential side of the fence by the developer without the requirement of responsibility for irrigation and maintenance by the developer. Canopy trees shall be installed in accordance with Section 2.4 of the Collier County LDC, except that required canopy trees shall 13 I8A 'iq consist of Mahogany trees. The buffer shall be enhanced by the installation of Cabbage Palm, or similar tree species, ranging from 12 -feet to 20 -feet tall at time of planting and shall be spaced on an average of 10 -feet on center. (4) Sorrento Gardens property owners shall be permitted to extend their residential fencing into the 7 -feet off -set area and up to the 8 -foot high fence of the PUD along the southern PUD boundary. I. Signs Signs shall be permitted as described in Section 2.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code. J. Hours of Operation No permitted use within this PUD shall be permitted to operate for 24 -hour periods of time. 14 SECTION IV DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 4.1 PURPOSE 8A The purpose of this Section is to set forth the commitments for the development of this project. 4.2 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with Final Site Development Plans, Final Subdivision Plans and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this PUD, in effect at the time of Final Plat, Final Site Development Plan approval or building permit application as the case may be. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of the official County Land Development Code shall apply to this project even if the land within the PUD is not to be platted. The developer, his successor and assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this document. The developer, his successor or assignee, shall follow the PUD Master Plan and the regulations of this PUD as adopted and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successor in title or assignee is subject to the commitments within this Agreement. 4.3 PUD MASTER PLAN A. Exhibit "A ", PUD Master Plan illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed area, lot or land use boundaries or special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final and may be varied at any subsequent approval phase such as Final Platting or Site Development Plan approval. Subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code, amendments may be made from time to time. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities and all common areas in the project. 15 -gp -� 4.4 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT /MONITORING REPORT A Site Development Plan shall be submitted per County regulations in effect at time of site plan submittal. The project is projected for completion in one (1) or two (2) phases. A. The landowners shall proceed and be governed according to the time limits pursuant to Section 2.7.3.4 of the Land Development Code. B. Monitoring Report: An annual monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Section 2.7.3.6 of the Collier County Land Development Code. 4.5 ENGINEERING A. This project shall be required to meet all County Ordinances in effect at the time final construction documents are submitted for development approval. B. Design and construction of all improvements shall be subject to compliance with appropriate provisions of the Collier County Land Development Code, Division 3.2., Subdivisions. 4.6 WATER MANAGEMENT A. A copy of the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Surface Water Permit Application shall be sent to Collier County Development Services with the SDP submittal, if required. B. Permits may be required for filling in a portion or all of the on -site lake, cleaning the lake, and /or re- sculpturing it. C. Lake setbacks for the existing lake (if retained) from the perimeter of the PUD to the south shall not be required as this lake is already located along a portion of the southern PUD boundary. Lake setbacks for any new lakes may be reduced to twenty -five (25) feet where a six (6) foot high fence or suitable substantial barrier is erected. 4.7 UTILITIES A. Water distribution, sewage collection and transmission and interim water and /or sewage treatment facilities to serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -17, as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. 16 8A 4.8 TRAFFIC A. The applicant shall be responsible for the installation of arterial level street lighting for any commercial project entrance onto Pine Ridge Road or Goodlette -Frank Road, prior to the issuance of any Certificates of Occupancy or Compliance. B. Drainage shall not be permitted to discharge directly into any off -site roadway drainage system but may discharge into the canal along the western side of Goodlette -Frank Road with necessary permits. C. Road Impact Fees shall be paid in accordance with Ordinance 00 -37, as amended, and shall be paid at the time building permits are issued unless otherwise approved by the Board of County Commissioners. D. Until such time as Area C and the easternmost lot in Area B are redeveloped, all existing access points on Pine Ridge Road for these two areas shall remain as they exist on the date of approval of this PUD. E. All commercial tracts shall provide internal cross access. F. Access locations to Pine Ridge Road and to Goodlette Frank Road are conceptual and subject to review and approval at final site development plan submittal consistent with the Access Control Policy (Resolution 01- 242), as may be amended, and the Collier County Construction Standards Handbook for Work Within the Public Right -of -Way (Ordinance 93 -64), as may be amended. All access locations and median locations are subject to modifications and/or closure at the discretion of Collier County. 4.9 PLANNING A. Pursuant to Section 2.2.25.8.1 of the Land Development Code, if during the course of site clearing, excavation or other construction activity a historic or archaeological artifact is found, all development within the minimum area necessary to protect the discovery shall be immediately stopped and the Collier County Code Enforcement Department contacted. B. All buildings, lighting, signage, landscaping and visible architecture infrastructure shall be architecturally and aesthetically unified, and shall comply with the Architectural and Site Design Guidelines and Standards of the Land Development Code. Said unified architectural theme shall include a similar architectural design and use of similar materials and colors throughout all of the buildings and signs to be erected on the site. 17 r 8A J Landscaping and streetscape materials shall also be similar in design throughout the site. A conceptual design master plan shall be submitted concurrent with the first application for Site Development Plan approval depicting these standards. 4.10 ENVIRONMENTAL A. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic -free) plan for the site, shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to Final Site Development Plan /Construction Plan approval for all parcels included on that project. B. A minimum of thirty (30) percent open space of the gross site area, as described in Section 2.6.32 of the Land Development Code, shall be provided for this commercial project. 18 0 r8A lip- p ;�- jg-g r C o � avoa WNW— ULMaoM 1 e -.r• � Ilia - " ell Fil i—' om o ( g li�1 I'll lei F•i �i � a I eSano j C p i �jj� z � I I! uu.! aev. ow mm •1 1: 11:1 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS The East 1/2 of the East 1/2 of Lot 51, Naples Improvement Company's Little Farms according to a map or plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 2, Page 2, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, excepting the East 125 feet thereof for one -half of a right -of- way and a grave plot described in O.R. Book 343 Page 688, and. Lots 1 - 9, Presque Isle, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 48, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; less the north 15 feet thereof, and The North 105 feet of the East 125 feet of the West half of Lot 51, less the North 15 feet for road right -of -way, Naples Improvement Company's Little Farms, per plat in Plat Book 2, Page 2, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. . 8A EXHIBIT "C" Property Owners' Names/Addresses (see Lot Numbers/Letters Shown on PUD Master Plan) 3.76 -Acre parcel at SW corner of Goodlette Rd./Pine Ridge Road - George W. Shepard & Son, Inc., P.O. Box 202, Naples, FL 34106 Most of Lot 1 - Roy Steven & Teresa Shepard, 1320 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34108 Lot 2 and Some of Lot 1 - Amy Ashby - 1298 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34108 Lot 3 & 4 - Edward F. McCarthey & Doris J. Lewis, 94 Second St. S., Naples, FL 34102 Lot 5 - Carolyn A. Marsh & Mary S. Booton, 12774 Hunters Ridge Dr., Bonita Springs, FL 34135 Lot 6 - Robert K. Munn, 2390 Kings Lake Blvd., Naples, FL 34112 Lot 7 - Jacqueline E. Daniel & Elizabeth J. Krupp, 1228 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, FL 34108 Lot 8 - Bobby L. & Roberta M. Bozeman., 128 McCallister Rd., Crawfordville, FL 32327 Lot 9 (S) - Dugan J. Porter Et Ux, 1185 Pine Ridge Court, Naples, FL 34108 Lot 9 (M) - Dugan J. Porter, P.O. Box 10039, Naples, FL 34101 Lot 9 (N) - James R. & Deborah Lawrence, 4580 Fifteenth Ave. SW, Naples, FL 34116 Lot X - Steven Thomas Stresen- Reuter, 585 Lakeland Ave., Naples, FL 34110 0 0 U) m 0 m 0 Z to LOCKUP SELF STORAGE 8 A M. PILLOT ECT. INC EXHIBIT D { 8A , STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct • copy of: ORDINANCE 2002 -08 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 26th day of February, 2002, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 1St day of March, 2002. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Cie$ ' Ex- officio to Board. of County Commissioners, By: Ellie Hoffman,;,,.... Deputy Clerk Ul' �� COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA 8 B REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: , Normal legal Advertisement ® Other: Legal Line Item Ad. (Display Adv., location, etc.) *************************************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** Originating Dept/ Div: Comprehensive Planning Person: Glenn E. Heath, AICP Date: 01/07/02 Petition No. (If none, give brief description): Advertisement for public hearing for new CDD. Petitioner: (Name & Address): Mirasol PUD c/o Charles Mann Pavese, Haverfield, Dalton, Harrison & Jensen, L.L.P Post Office Drawer 1507 Fort Myers, FL 33902 -1507 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Hearing before XXX BCC BZA Other ' Requested Hearing date: February 12, 2002. Based on advertisement appearing 4 consecutive weeks before hearing, on January 15, 2002, January 22, 2002, January 29, 2002, and February 5, 2002. Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News Other Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: Attached ® Legally Required Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date): N/A Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? ® Yes ❑ No. If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 111- 138317- 341490 Reviewed by: < Approved by: Z` -7-617- Division Division Head Date List Attachments: N County Manager DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS Date A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one coy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: ❑ County Manager agenda file: to ❑ Requesting Division Clerk's Office ❑ Original B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. **************************************************************************** * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ** o /h X/-6%. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ON Y: 0Als ZV46 z Date Received: of Date of Public hearing: /z. z._- Date Advertised: o o z Z gg BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RE: PROPOSED ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO ) SECTION 190.005 (2), FLORIDA STATUTES ) TO ESTABLISH THE FLOW WAY ) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ) 1 PETITION TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT DISTRICT MIRASOL DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., (hereinafter "Petitioner "), by and through its undersigned attorney, hereby petitions the Collier County Board of County Commissioners to adopt an ordinance: establish and recognizing a Community Development District (hereinafter "District ") pursuant to the Uniform Community Development District Act of 1980, Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, as amended; acknowledging the uniform district charter contained in Sections 190.006 through 190.041 as provided by Section 190.004(4), Florida Statutes, establishing the District on the property described herein within which the District may manage and finance its basic infrastructure systems, facilities and services as provided in its charter; and designating the initial District Board of Supervisors. In support of this petition, Petitioner states: 1. Location and Size. The proposed District is located entirely within Collier County, Florida. Exhibit 1 depicts the general location of the project. The proposed district covers approximately 830 acres of land. The site is located in portions of Section 15 and Section 22, near the intersection of CR 951 and Immokalee Road. The metes and bounds description of the external boundaries of the District is set forth in Exhibit 2. FAWPDATA\NM \CCMS\PETITION.DOC Pagel of 7 r 8 B i,o 2. Excluded Parcels. There are no parcels within the external boundaries of the proposed District, which are to be excluded from the District. 3. Landowner Consent. At the time of filing this Petition, all of the land to be included in the District is owned by IMCOLLIER Joint Venture. Petitioner has obtained written consent to establish the District in accordance with Section 190.005, F.S. Documentation of this consent is contained in Exhibit 3. 4. Initial Board Members. The five persons designated to serve as the initial members of the Board of Supervisors of the proposed District is as follows: Christopher G. Claussen 2074 Sevilla Way Naples. FL 34109 Jack Sterling 322164 th St. SW Naples, FL 34105 Bruce Bowers 1205 Pocantico Lane Naples FL 34110 Mark Alderuccio 5425 Park Central Court Naples, FL 34109 Thomas Barrett 132 -204 Pebble Shores Drive Naples, FL 34110 All of the above - listed persons are residents of the State of Florida, and citizens of the United States of America. 5. Name. The proposed name of the District is the "Flow Way Community Development District." FAWPDATA \NM \CCMS\PETITION.DOC Page 2 of 7 88 6. Existing Zoning. Currently, the lands to be included within the District are zoned PUD. Neighboring lands are principally zoned PUD and AG, as shown in Exhibit 4. 7. Future Land Uses. The future general distribution, location, and extent of the public and private land uses proposed for the District by future land use plan element of the County's Future Land Use Plan is identified on Exhibit 5. The construction of approximately up to 799 residential dwelling units, recreational areas, 36 holes of golf, clubhouse, a swimming and fitness facility, a tennis facility, and a network of trails and parks are authorized for the portions of the development to be included within the District. Development is projected to occur over an estimated 8 -year period. The proposed land uses for the lands contained within the proposed District are consistent with the approved Collier County Future Land Use Plan. 8. Major Water and Wastewater Facilities. Exhibit 6 shows the major trunk water mains and wastewater interceptors within the currently undeveloped lands proposed to be included within the District. A portion of the storm water run -off will be reclaimed for golf course irrigation. It is currently proposed that Collier County will provide water and sewer service to the lands within the District. 9. District Facilities and Services. Exhibit 7, attached hereto, depicts the type of facilities the Petitioner presently expects the District to finance, construct and install from approximately 2001 -2008. The estimated costs of construction are also described in Exhibit 7. Actual construction timetables and expenditures will likely vary, due in part to the effects of future changes in the economic conditions upon costs such as labor services materials interest rates, and market conditions. F: \WPDATA\NM \CCMS\PETITION.DOC Page 3 of 7 r 8g 10. Mitigation lands for the project in Sections 10 and 15 and to the east for Section 10. The District shall have the authority, pursuant to Section 190.012 (1)(f), Florida Statutes, to exercise all powers under the Act with regard to the mitigation lands depicted in Exhibit 8. These mitigation lands are in addition to the mitigation lands located within the boundaries of the District and are required by the South Florida Water Management District to obtain the Environmental Resource Permit (Application No. 000518 -10). These areas are necessary to construct the public and private land uses identified in Exhibit 5. The District will take all required action, including the maintenance of habitat and/or plant and animal species as required by this permit to offset any unavoidable environmental impacts resulting from development of the land uses in the District. 11. Chain or ribbon of lakes. The District shall have the authority, pursuant to Section 190.012 (1)(a), Florida Statutes, to exercise all powers under the Act on the water management improvements depicted in Exhibit 8. These water conveyance improvements provide the necessary legal positive outfall to drain the land uses within the District. These conveyances are also a condition for the issuance of the South Florida Water Management District to obtain the Environmental Resource Permit (Application No. 000518 -10) required for the lands within the District. 12. Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs. Exhibit ,9 is the statement of estimated regulatory costs ( "SERC ") prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541. Florida Statutes (1997). The SERC is based upon presently available data. The data and methodology used in preparing the SERC, accompany it. FAWPDATA\NM \CCMS\PETITION.DOC Page 4 of 7 r 86 '. 13. Authorized Agent. The Petitioner, Mirasol Development, L.L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Company, is authorized to do business in Florida. The authorized agent for the Petitioner is: Robert G. Claussen 6025 Carlton Lakes Blvd. Naples, FL 34110 See Exhibit 10 — Authorization of Agent. Copies of all correspondence and official notices should also be sent to: Dr. Henry Fishkind Fishkind & Associates, Inc. 11869 High Tech Avenue Orlando, FL 32817 And: Ms. Neale Montgomery, Esq. Pavese, Haverfield, Dalton, Harrison, & Jensen, L.L.P. P.O. Drawer 1507 Ft. Myers, FL 33902 -1507 14. This petition to establish the Flow Way Community Development District should be granted for the following reasons: A. Establishment of the District and all land used and services planned within the proposed District are not inconsistent with applicable elements or portions of the effective State Comprehensive Plan or the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. B. The area of land within the proposed District is part of a planned community. It is of a sufficient size and is sufficiently compact and contiguous to be developed as one functional and interrelated community. C. The establishment of the District will prevent the general body of taxpayers in Collier County from bearing the burden for installation of the FAWPDATA\NM \CCMS\PETITION.DOC Page 5 of 7 infrastructure and the maintenance of certain facilities with the development encompassed by the District. The District is the best alternative for delivering community development service and facilities to the proposed community without imposing an additional burden on the general population of the local general- purpose government. Establishment of the District in conjunction with a comprehensively planned community, as proposed, allows for a more efficient use of resources. D. The community development services and facilities of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and use of existing local and regional community development services and facilities. In addition, the establishment of the District will provide a perpetual entity capable of making reasonable provisions for the operation and maintenance of the District's services and facilities. E. The area to be served by the proposed District is amenable to separate special- district government. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the County Commission of Collier County, Florida to: 1. Direct its staff to schedule a public hearing in accordance with the requirements of Section 190.005 (2) (b). Florida Statutes (1997); 2. Grant the petition and adopt an ordinance to establish the District pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes; 3. Consent to the District's exercise of certain additional powers to finance, fund, plan, establish, acquire, construct, reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate and FAWPDATA\NM \CCMS\PETITION.DOC Page 6 of 7 8 B maintain systems and facilities for: (i) parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses, (ii) security, including, but not limited to, guard- houses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion- detection systems, and patrol cars, when authorized by proper governmental agencies, all as authorized and described by Section 190.012 (2), Florida Statutes. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this a `5t day of r\�G't eivl 1)e;— , 2001. Neale Mkntgomery Pavese, averfield, Da on, Harrison & Jensen, L.L.P. 1833 Hendry Street P.O. Drawer 1507 Fort Myers, FL 33902 -1507 Representatives for the Petitioner FAWPDATA\NMNCCMSIPETITION.DOC Page 7 of 7 List of Exhibits for PETITION TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT DISTRICT (Flow Way CDD) Exhibit 1, Depicts the general location of the project Exhibit 2, The metes and bounds description of the external boundaries of the district Exhibit 3, Documentation of consent of landowners Exhibit 4, A map showing existing land use and zoning information within and adjacent to the proposed District Exhibit 5, The future general distribution, location, and extent of the public and Private land uses proposed for the District by future land use plan element of the County's Future Land Use Plan Exhibit 6, Major trunk water mains and wastewater interceptors within the currently undeveloped lands proposed to be included within the District Exhibit 7, Depiction of type of facilities to be built, and estimated timetable and costs of construction Exhibit 8, Mitigation Lands, Water management improvements Exhibit 9, Statement of estimated regulatory costs ( "SERC ") prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541. Florida Statutes (1997) Exhibit 10, Authorization of agent F: \WPDATA\NM \CCMS\List of Exhibits for petition.doc f q ®�__ r- 'r(�(��?�� 1111111 v6 "RVJ&E _ OCA T/d cj 0ITITAYEVAF 04 1] 1 LA;AI 1 V N MAF EXHIBIT 1 I G� 9 L7� CAS � B C27 t� I m C9 CIO C18 C20 —C24 I I � C ?e ( oti N C30 C31 32 C33 G34 G N C35 —C37 N m m n O O Z Z s A N 0 IN SECTION 15 L9 . _ . _ . _ • — SECTION 22 I W cm I I L24 iL7 I I I I a I I U) I I N m I L5 I�1 O O Z Z N I I w I � i ■■■■■r 11111AGNOLI I =1:::iBARBER & ■■■■■■ i L3 ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■m RUNDAGE, INC. Professional Engineers, Planners & Land Surveyors C 11k C..7:7400 T.,i,.i Trail N.- N. plr,, FL- 34106- Ph.:(941)S97- 31II- Fa:(941)S6 UO3 • Ise Cowry: 1615 Hendry Arta: - Fort My.., FL 33901 - Ph.: (941) 337- 1111 - Fu: (9411334.1175 CauBum d A.,hori—i— Nw. LB 3664 and EB 3664 FOR: J.D. NICEWONDER TITLE: G P.O.B. METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION I SOUTH 1/4 CORNER FOR THE FLOW WAY CDD Line, ECTION 22 Located In Portions of SECTIONS 22 8 15, T 48 S, R 26 E, I COLLIER COUNTY, FL. U L26 DRAWN BY: ROP ABB PROJECT No.: 8 . _ . CHECKED BY: GPA ACRD FILE NAME: 8074MB02 IMMOKALEE ROAD (S.R. 846) DATE: 0= )9 0' SHEET FILE No.: 7883. OF SCALE: 1" = 1000' SHfET f OF LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING Lt 990.31 B '09'08 "W L2 1332.41 N01'10'O6 "W L3 328.98 N89'07'39" L4 1332.56 N01'1 '59 "W L5 655.72 S89'06'1 "W L6 1332.31 N01'06'47 "W L7 653.40 S8 '04' 6 "W LS 1331.97 N01'00'48 "W L9 651.08 S89 '41 "W L10 2662.98 N00'S9'O6 "W L11 988.18 N00'S9'00 "W L13 139.54 S 3'10'48 "W L14 98.12 57656'44 "W L15 38.87 N58'20'56 "W Lt6 75.67 S51'38'22 "W L77 215.48 N71'44'38 "W L18 80.88 586'12'12 "W L19 74.98 N57'50'09 "W L20 160.49 S55'42'20 "W L21 738.04 501'43'53" L22 2676.29 S01'41'44" L23 1334.41 S01'4 '40 "E L24 1306.80 S89'04'26 "W L25 2667.44 501'30'39 "E L26 164.50 S8 'OB' 3 "W L27 1333.63 S01'29'06 "E L28 1155.54 589'10'34 "W EXHIBIT 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF NICEWONDER PROPERTY SOUTH 8 uu ^ A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 15 AND 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID PARCEL OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY V DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; Beginning at the South Quarter Corner of said Section 22; thence S.89'09'08 "W., a distance of 990.31 feet; thence N.01'10'06 "W., a distance of 1,332.41 feet; thence N.89'07'39 "E., a distance of 328.98 feet; thence N.01'12'59 "W., a distance of 1,332.56 feet; thence S.89'06'10 "W., a distance of 655.72 feet; thence N.01'06'47 "W., a distance of 1,332.31 feet; thence S.89'04'26 "W., a distance of 653.40 feet; thence N.01'00'48 "W., a distance of 1,331.97 feet; thence S.89'02'41 "W., a distance of 651.08 feet; thence N.00'59'06 "W., a distance of 2,662.98 feet; thence N.00'59'00 "W., a distance of 988.18 feet to the point of curve of a non tangent curve to the left, of which the radius point lies N.21'31'58 "W., a radial distance of 359.00 feet; thence northeasterly along the arc, through a central angle of 29'40'27 ", a distance of 185.93 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 381.00 feet and a central angle of 18'46'56 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 124.90 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 312.00 feet and a central angle of 27'38'40 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 150.54 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 1,988.00 feet and a central angle of 03'33'22 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 123.39 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 412.00 feet and a central angle of 35'06'17 "; thence northerly along the arc, a distance of 252.43 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet and a central angle of 24'47'52 "; thence northerly along the arc, a distance of 81.37 feet; thence N.23'10'48 "E., a distance of 139.54 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 98.00 feet and a central angle of 107'41'02 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 184.18 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 53'55'06 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 199.50 feet; thence N.76'56'44 "E., a distance of 98.12 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 88.00 feet and a central angle of 44'42'20 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 68.66 feet; thence S.58'20'56 "E., a distance of 38.87 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of 112.00 feet and a central angle of 71'41'55 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 140.15 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 225.00 feet and a central angle of 28'55'44 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 113.60 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 27'20'10 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 101.15 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 38.00 feet and a central angle of 58'26'43 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 38.76 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 32'15'37 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 119.37 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet and a central angle of 23'02'51 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 75.62 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 46'44'53 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 172.97 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet and a central angle of 28'19'29 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 92.94 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 30'42'52 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 113.65 feet; thence N.51'38'22 "E., a distance of 75.67 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet and a central angle of 56'37'01 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 185.77 feet; thence S.71'44'38 "E., a distance of 215.48 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of 312.00 feet and a central angle of 15'36'30 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 84.99 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 138.00 feet and a central angle of 30'18'09 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 72.99 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 162.00 feet and a central angle of 38'42'28 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 109.44 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 138.00 feet and a central angle of 34'16'32 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 82.55 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 162.00 feet and a central angle of 32"18'53 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 91.37 feet; thence N.86"12'12 "E., a distance of 80.88 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 138.00 feet (SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR CONTINUATION) GENERAL NOTES: 1. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. * NOT A SURVEY 2. R.O.W. = RIGHT -OF -WAY. 3. CURVE DIMENSIONS ■■■ ■a■r 0011 GNOLI ARE AS FOLLOWS: y :":::RBARBER & ■1 ■ ■■ ■� A = DELTA, R = RADIUS, A = ARC, CH = CHORD, ::::::�BRUNDAGE, INC. AND CHB = CHORD BEARING Professional Engineers, Planners & Land Surveyors Collier Coan:y:1100 Tamiami T,.il N.. NVIl ., FL - 31108 - Ph.: (911159] -3111 - Fax: (911) 566-22 Lee Co-y 1625 Hendry 5-1- Foe. My-, FL 33901 - Ph.: (9411337-3111 - Fax: (911) 33411 4. BEARINGS ARE ASSUMED BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE : a[<o(Aolho xat on Nos. LB 3664 ..d P SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, FOR: J.D. NICEWON ONDER BEING N 89'10'34" E. "�E` METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION I 5. TOTAL AREA = 829.74 ACRES MORE OR LESS. FOR THE FLOW WAY CDD Line, EXHIBIT 2 EXt112i11 2 CURVE TABLE 14 CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA TANGENT CHORD BEARING gg Ct 359.00 185.93 29'40'27" 95.10 N53'37'49 "E C2 381.00 124.90 18'4&'56" 63.01 S48'11'03 "W C3 312.00 150.54 27.38'40" 76.76 N43'45'11 "E C4 1988.00 123.39 3'33'22" 61.71 531'42'32 "W CS 412.00 252.43 35'06'17" 130.32 N15'56'05 "E C6 188.00 81.37 2447'52" 41.33 S10'46'S2 "W C7 98.00 184.19 107'41'02" 134.11 S77'Ot'19 "W C8 212.00 199.50 53.55'06" 107.83 876'05'43 "E C9 88.00 68.66 44.42'2p" 36.19 N80'42'O6 "W C10 112.00 140.15 71'41'55" 80.92 N85'48'O6 "E C11 225.00 113.60 28'55'44" 58.04 S64'25'01 "W C12 212.00 101.15 27'20'1 0" 51.55 N65'12'47 "E C13 38.00 38.76 5826'43` 21.26 S80'46'04 "W C14 212.00 119.37 3 '15' 7" 61.31 S86'08'24 "E C15 188.00 75.62 23'0 'S1" 38.33 589'15'13 "W C16 212.00 172.97 46'44'53" 91.63 N77'24'12 "E C17 188.00 92.94 28'19' 9` 47.44 568'11'29 "W C18 212.00 113.65 30'4 '52` 58.22 N66'S9'48'E C19 188.00 185.77 56'37'01" 101.26 S79'S6'S2 "W C20 312.00 84.99 15'36'30" 42.76 579'32'53 "E C21 138.00 72.99 30'18'09" 37.37 N7 '12'03 "W C22 162.00 109.44 3842' 8` 58.90 S76'24'13 "E C23 138.00 82.55 34'16'3 42.55 N78'37'11 "W C24 162.00 91.37 32'18'53" 46.93 S77'38' 22 "E C25 138.00 224.07 9.01'46" 145.50 N47'16'S5`W C26 312.00 330.36 60'40'03" 182.57 S31'06'04 "E C27 112.00 57.69 29'30'43" 29.50 S76'1 1'27 "E C28 308.00 383.12 71'76'11" 220.79 N55'18'43 "W C29 908.00 484.40 30.33' 7" 248.11 N04 3'39 "W C30 112.00 134.34 88.43'2g" 76.58 S23'28' 25`E C37 512.00 333.98 37' 2'29" 173.18 S76'31'24 "E C32 488.00 155.66 18'16'33` 78.50 N 6'04'22'W C33 512.00 297.82 33'19'39" 153.25 N86 4'05 "E C34 488.00 178.15 0'54'59" 90.08 S80'1 1'45"W 25'30'56" 4 48.00 N N77'S3'47 "E C36 5 588.00 2 217.08 1 1'09'09" 1 109.79 7 75'42'S3'W C37 1 103.00 5 54.98 3 30'35'07" 2 28.16 N N70'S9'54'E (CONTINUED FROM SHEET 2 OF 3) and a central angle of 93'01'46 "; thence southeasterly along the are a distance of 224.07 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 312.00 feet and a central angle of 60'40'03 "; thence southeasterly along the arc, a distance of 330.36 feet to a point of compound curve to the left having a radius of 112.00 feet and a central angle of 29'30'43 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 57.69 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 308.00 feet and a central angle of 71'16'11 "; thence southeasterly along the arc, a distance of 383.12 feet to a point of compound curve to the right having a radius of 908.00 feet and a central angle of 30'33'57 "; thence southerly along the arc, a distance of 484.39 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 112.00 feet and a central angle of 68'43'29 "; thence southeasterly along the arc, a distance of 134.34 feet; thence S.57'50'09 "E., a distance of 74.98 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of 512.00 feet and a central angle of 37'22'29 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 333.98 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 488.00 feet and a central angle of 18'16'33 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 155.66 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 512.00 feet and a central angle of 33'19'39 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 297.82 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 488.00 feet and a central angle of 20'54'59 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 178.15 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 25'30'56 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 94.41 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 588.00 feet and a central angle of 21'09'09 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 217.08 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 103.00 feet and a central angle of 30'35'07 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 54.98 feet; thence N.55'42'20 "E., a distance of 160.49 feet; thence S.01'43'53 "E., a distance of 738.04 feet; thence S.01'41'44 "E., a distance of 2,676.29 feet; thence S.01'42'40 "E., a distance of 1,334.41 feet; thence S.89'04'26 "W., a distance of 1,306.80 feet; thence S.01'30'39 "E., a distance of 2,667.44 feet; thence S.89'08'23 "W., a distance of 164.50 feet; thence S.01'29'06 "E., a distance of 1,333.63 feet; thence S.89'10'34 "W., a distance of 1,155.54 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. "I'll Containing 829.74 acres, more or less; 0 8019BARBER & subject to easements and restrictions of record. •;• ■;;� i ■ii ■■PBRUNDAGE, INC. Professional Engineers, Planners & Land Surveyors Collier Counry: N- --iami Tn it N. - N.,'.,, FL - 3110! - Ph.: 1911)19] -)111- Fa: 1,,,,163201 * q; 62S Fl ,d,' Fon MPn,,FL33901- Ph:(991)3lJ- )111- Fa:1911113411 ]S Gfie 1423.end..n NOT A SURVEY CelC6 C of No n Nos. LB )664 and EB 3664 FOR: J.D. NICEWONDER AGNOLI, BA R BRUNDAGE, INC. TI TLE: METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION Professional gi ers, Planners & Land Surveyors FOR THE FLOW WAY CDD Line, Located In Portions of SECTIONS 22 8 15, T 48 S, R 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FL. BY N BY: ROP ABB PROJECT No.: Guy P. A ams, P.S.M. # 4390 ED BY: GPA ACAD FILE NAME: 8074MB02 LDATE 7883 CG0 : V =__1000' SHEET 3 OF 3 EXt112i11 2 C35 2 212.00 9 94.41 2 25'30'56" 4 48.00 N N77'S3'47 "E C36 5 588.00 2 217.08 1 1'09'09" 1 109.79 7 75'42'S3'W C37 1 103.00 5 54.98 3 30'35'07" 2 28.16 N N70'S9'54'E ( 86 EXHIBIT 3 Consent and Joinder of Landowners To Establishment of a Community Development District The undersigned is the owner of certain lands more fully described on Exhibit Z attached hereto and made a part hereof ( "Property "). The undersigned understands and acknowledges that Mirasol Development, L.L.C. ( "Petitioner ") intends to submit an application to establish a Community Development District in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 190 of the Florida Statutes. As an owner of lands which are intended to constitute the Community Development District, the undersigned understands and acknowledges that pursuant to the provisions of Section 190.0005, Florida Statutes, the Petitioner is required to include the written consent to the establishment of the Community Development District of one Kindred percent (100 %) of the owners of the lands to be included within the Community Development District. The undersigned hereby consents to the establishment of a Community Development District which will include the Property within the lands to ')e part of the Community Development District and agrees to further execute any documentation necessary or convenient to evidence this consent and joinder during the application process for the establishment of the Community Development District. The undersigned acknowledges that the consent will remain in full force and effect until the Community Development District is established or three years from the date hereof, which ever shall first occur. The undersigned further agrees that it will provide to the next purchaser or successor in interest of all or any portion of the Property a copy of this consent form obtain, if requested by Petitioner, a consent to establishment of the Community Development District in substantially this form. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that it has taken all actions and obtained all consents necessary to duly authorize the execution of this consent and joinder by the officer executing this instrument. Executed this day, September 1, 2001 IMCOLLIER JOINT VENTURE, A Florida General Partnership, By: Mirasol Development, LLC A Florida Limited Liability Company, Managing Venturer BY: Robe G. Claussen, Managing Member STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1 day of September, 2001, by Robert G. Claussen, Managing Member, on behalf of the Landowners. He is per5pnally known to me. OFFICIAL N OTARY SEA' F�el li JOHN J STERLING 0 00mol ON NU1lEJi CC730692 my cmumm- WWM F�OQ` APR. 5.2002 M 44 O m co b0 w ca Pa T 46 S I T 41 S I T 48 S I T 49 S 1 T 50 S I T 51 S I T 52 S I T 53 S W ui - CO N � Q a >W r y�pL•N� "sue LU W m 1 CO) U4� �. W go "� m N m z, a Q M i ► u :E ii 2 R i .. W W ° t� W L ZIC N a z Q w o < z ° yagy 5t< w imo �a a w ° o sbU m o z W J w ` lz =F M S� rc S F W W O _ Us p a g 7 aW < mw �g s W - U LC2 C< 4 Z W / 10,E I O J< W ui - CO N � Q a >W r y�pL•N� "sue Wo: ng sip W m 1 CO) U4� �. W go "� m N m z, a Q b b: i a u :E 2 R W W ° t� W L ZIC N Q o U. yagy 5t< w imo �a m o z i s droll +unl,+al„lu I W - / 10,E I O o \ W 1 W Z. W 1 _ - �J �` I a` � Q F a r - - - - 1 -' 0^. = . 1 ■ ) L IN I W ui CO N � Q �x rmqwl W m 1 CO) W m N y ■� Q b b: i a u :E W W ° t� W L N Q U. S 94 1 11111..11..1... ui CO N �x rmqwl 1 b b: i 4 z G S L4 1 I S 84 1 I S 64 1 I S 09 1 a� I ®i7 9 L (- n 4 F I` �a a a gg U f 5 W M LU M M LU N M M W u W t 4 � N W co N W N s W W " N m�a °zN S t9 1 I S Z9 1 I S 99 1 I ui CO N �x cc s W W " N m�a °zN S t9 1 I S Z9 1 I S 99 1 I b b: i 4 z s W W " N m�a °zN S t9 1 I S Z9 1 I S 99 1 I O O N CL d r- U � H N W E 2 w Im IL 0 J m W w � w W r� d r_ CC c .O Z 0 O 0 � U E } � Q co E- _n Z X W z a H a U N W 0 W F I tA M CO O N O O , a�*, ONO - lw -I O -'- COO COD COO v VI COO (N C1 O 1IT ((DO LO 0 O o r` r- M ui Ld cnl to .- to 613 r- 69 643, 69 0) N L NI C co m n N N - EA Vi dA tol to to M T O Cp O CMD QN 0 O N O Cl) � 69 OD 0 69 69 6 6 ' n = M 00 (00 v N r+ 04 O O CA r� O LO CO (00 O 0 r- COO S�l Cl) N IT O O O - .-- (OI 69 N — Cl) N r 69 69i 69 t9 fA 69 FA to co co O N O Pr7 C) O OI M 0 .- O O O c OH � 0 00 � O ONO L O ffi 6 t 6 6 M 64 n Er A � � � f!/ ri 91 69 C00 N '^V O sO� r_ O O�1 .- 0 O O M CD CO O C'41 N N N CO O LO O st 0 O M O t` N P,. M O M N to r: to N3 69 " to to (0 69 2 W H Z } O CO z w CD = ¢ w C7 �- Z z w U z _O rr z w (Jj W fs�j U W z Q w O Z Z Z w Q Z ? w a OU J N M v to 0 r` 0 M H O H 8B �� Exhibit 5 Page 2 of 3 a. Presently developed sites; 8B - f'^ . b. Sites where water - dependent or water - related uses have been previously established; C. Sites where shoreline improvements are in place; d. Sites where damage to viable, naturally functioning wetlands, or other environmentally sensitive features, could be minimized. Port of the Islands is a unique development, which is located within the Urban Designated Area, but is also totally within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern. However, a portion of the development was determined "vested" by the State of Florida, thus exempting it from the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Further, there is an existing Development Agreement between Port of the Islands, Inc. and the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs dated July 2, 1985, which regulates land uses at Port of the Islands. Port of the Islands is eligible for all provisions of the Urban - Mixed Use District in which it is located to the extent that the overall residential density and commercial intensity does not exceed that permitted under zoning at time of adoption of this Plan. 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. This Subdistrict comprises approximately 93,000 acres and 80% of the Urban Mixed Use District. Maximum eligible residential density shall be determined through the Density Rating System but shall not exceed 16 dwelling units per acre except in accordance with the Transfer of Development Rights Section of the Land Development Code. (IV) 2. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the Conservation Designated Area and the Urban Designated Area. It includes that area south of US 41 between the City of Naples and Collier- Seminole State Park, including Marco Island and comprises approximately 18,000 acres and 15% of the Urban Mixed Use District. In order to facilitate hurricane evacuation and to protect the adjacent environmentally sensitive Conservation Designated Area, residential densities shall be limited to a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre, except as allowed in the Density Rating System to exceed 4 units per acre through provision of Affordable Housing and Transfer of Development Rights, and except as provided in the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay. Rezones are recommended to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development. The Marco Island Master Plan shall provide for density, intensity, siting criteria and specific standards for land use districts on Marco Island. 3. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the Urban Designated Area and the Agricultural /Rural Area and comprises approximately 5,500 acres and 5% of the Urban Mixed Use District. Residential land uses may be allowed at a maximum density of 1.5 units per gross acre, subject to the following conditions: and are not subject to the Density Rating System: a. All rezones are encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development; and b. Proposed development in the area shall be fully responsible for all necessary water management improvements, including the routing of all on -site and appropriate off -site water through the project's water management system, and a fair share cost of necessary improvements to the CR 951 canal /out -fall system made necessary by new development • in the area. 19 (IV) = Plan Amendment CP- 2000 -1 adopted by Ordinance No. 2000 -87 on December 12, 2000 Exhibit 5 Pa 3 f the asphalt plant: is compatible with surrounding land uses; is not located in a County, State or Federal jurisdictional wetland area and any required buffer zones; is not located within • 1,000 feet of a Florida State Park; is not located within the Area of Critical State Concern as depicted on the Future Land Use Map; and, is not located within 1,000 feet of a natural reservation I. Commercial uses accessory to other permitted uses, such as restaurant accessory to golf course or retail sales of produce accessory to farming, so long as restrictions or limitations are imposed to insure the commercial use functions as an accessory, subordinate use. Such restrictions or limitations could include limiting the size and /or location of the commercial use and/or limiting access to the commercial use; m. Commercial uses, within the Rural Commercial Subdistrict, based upon criteria; n. Industrial uses within the Rural - Industrial District; o. Travel trailer recreational vehicle parks, provided the following criteria are met: 1. The density is consistent with the Land Development Code; 2. The site has direct principal access to a road classified as an arterial in the Traffic Circulation Element, direct principal access defined as a driveway and /or roadway connection to the arterial road, with no access points from intervening properties; and, 3. The use will be compatible with surrounding land uses. (1) A. Agricultural /Rural - Mixed Use District The purpose of this District is to protect and encourage agricultural activities, conserve and preserve environmentally sensitive areas, provide for low density residential development, and other uses identified under the Agricultural /Rural Designation. These areas generally lack public facilities and services. Urbanization is not promoted, therefore most allowable land uses are of low intensity in an effort to maintain and promote the rural character of these lands. Residential uses are allowed as follows, su.'-,ject to the Interim Development Provisions: a. Low density residential dwelling units, at a maximum density of one dwelling unit per five gross acres, except for legal non - conforming lots of record., b. Dormitories, duplexes and other staff housing, as may be provided in conjunction with conservation uses, at a density in accordance with the Land Development Code; C. Group housing uses at a density in accordance with that permitted in the Land Development Code; d. Staff housing in conjunction with safety service facilities and essential services, at a density in accordance with the Land Development Code; e. Farm labor housing in accordance with the Farm Labor Housing provision in the Land Development Code; f. Recreation camps as defined in, and at the density allowed by, the Land Development Code. g. Existing units approved for the Fiddler's Creek DRI may be reallocated to those parts of Sections 18 and 19, Township 51 South, Range 27 East added to Fiddler's Creek DRI together with part of Section 29, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, at a density greater than 1 unit per 5 gross acres provided that no new units are added to the 6,000 previously approved units, which results in a gross density of 1.6 units per acre for the Fiddler's Creek DRI; and further provided that no residential units shall be located on that part of Section 29 within the Fiddler's Creek DRI; and further provided that South Florida Water Management District jurisdictional wetlands impacted by the DRI in said Sections do not exceed 10 acres. (1) 1. Rural Commercial Subdistrict Within the Agricultural /Rural - Mixed Use District, commercial development, up to a maximum is of 200 acres, may be allowed providing the following standards for intensity of use are met and subject to the Interim Development Provisions: a. The project, or that portion of a larger project, which is devoted to commercial 35 .......... — ..................................... .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. CMRE�YO"ED . ..... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... ...... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. MDS P.U.D. .......... ...... ...... ............ ............... I .. .............................. I ... — ............. .. ... .................... :: " ...... .............. ............ ........... ....... ........... ................ ........................ ................. ...... .................... .......................... .................. ............... ........... ............. ........... .................. I . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . :49� Se, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ZA J WL 13 16 cpx low. gg u1i; iT a h X A X� AVIV AM ID' Ow- :%K fill "A T 01WO. 4 77 . . . . . . . . . . ........ Jir ACV_ A OF ff, 40 NMI Aft 51&1 . .... 13 11 ff rT� WAN I: •0 ma Exhibit 9 STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS 1.0 Introduction . 1.1 Purpose and Scope Page 1 of 5 " S B ". This Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs ( "SERC ") supports the petition to form the Flow Way Community Development District ( "District "). The proposed District comprises approximately 95C acres of land located in Collier County, Florida. The limitations on the scope of this SERC are explicitly set out in Section 190.002(2)(d), F.S. (governing District formation or alteration) as follows: "That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general law shall be fair anc based only on factors material to managing and financing the service delivery function of the district, so that any matter concerning permitting or planning of the development is not material or relevant (emphasis added.)" 1.2 Overview of the Flow Way Community Development District The District is designed to provide community infrastructure, services, and facilities along with their operations and maintenance, to the proposed Mirasol development. Flow Way Community Development District will be an upscale, fully amenitized, residential golf course community. The proposed development plan for the lands within the District include the construction of up to 79� single family residential dwelling units, recreational areas, 36 holes of golf, a golf clubhouse, a swirr and fitness facility, a tennis facility, and a network of trails and parks, is authorized for portions of the development to be included within the District. 1.3 Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs Section 120.541(2), F.S. (1997), defines the elements a statement of estimated regulatory costs mus contain: "(a) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to compl,' with the rule, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected b� the rule. (b) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local governmen entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and any anticipated effect on state an( local revenues. (c) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entitieE including local governmental entities, required to comply with the requirements of the rule. As uses in this paragraph, "transactional costs" are direct costs that are readily ascertainable based upo standard business practices, and include filing fees, the cost of obtaining a license, the cost c equipment required to be installed or used or procedures required to be employed in complying wit the rule, additional operating costs incurred, and the cost of monitoring and reporting. P. 8 B Exhibit 9 Page 2 of 5 (d) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and ar analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. Collie, County is not defined as a small county for purposes of this requirement. (e) Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful. (f) In the statement or revised statement, whichever applies, a description of any good faith writter proposal submitted under paragraph (1) (a) and either a statement adopting the alternative or z statement of the reasons for rejecting the alternative in favor of the proposed rule. 2.0 A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the ordinance, together with a general description of the type: of individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance. As noted above, Flow Way Community Development District is a residential community designed foi up to 799 total residential units. Formation of the proposed District would put all of these household! under the jurisdiction of the proposed District. 3.0 Good Faith estimate of the cost to state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues. 3.1 Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance State Governmental Entities There will be only modest costs to various State governmental entities to implement and enforce the proposed formation of the District. The District has fewer than 1,000 acres, so Collier County is the establishing entity under 190.005 (2). F.S. The modest costs to various State entities to implemen and enforce the proposed ordinance relate strictly to the receipt and processing of various report that the proposed District is required to file with the State and its various entities. Appendix A list the reporting requirements. The costs to those State agencies that will receive and process the District's reports are very small, because the District is only one of many governmental units that ar( required to submit the various reports. Therefore, the marginal cost of processing one additional se of report is inconsequential. Additionally, pursuant to section 189.412, F.S., the proposed distric must pay an annual fee to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs, which offsets sucl costs. Collier County Since the proposed District ? , in Collier County and consists of less than 1,000 acres, Collier Count and its staff will process, analyze and vote upon the petition to establish the District. These activitie will absorb some resources. Furthermore, even these costs to the County are modest for a number of reasons. First, review of th petition to establish the District does not include analysis of the project itself. Second, the petitio itself provides much of the information needed for a staff review. Third, local governments routinel Exhibit 9 Page 3 of S process similar petitions for land uses and zoning changes that are far more rcom lex than A the petition to establish a community development district. RB I 3.2 Impact on State and _ocal Revenues Adoption of the proposed ordinance will have no negative impact on State or local revenues. The District is an independent unit of local government. It is designed to provide community facilities and services to serve the Mirasol development project. It has its own sources of revenue. No State or local subsidies are required or expected. In this regard it is important to note than any debt obligations incurred by the District to construct its infrastructure, or for any other reason, are not debts of the State of Florida or any unit of local government. In accordance with State law, debts of the District are strictly its own responsibility. 4.0 A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities required to comply with the requirements of the ordinance. Table 1 provides an outline of the various facilities and services the proposed District may provide. The drainage facilities will all be funded, operated and owned by the District. The District will also fund the construction of the water and sewer distribution system. However, the County will own and operate the water and sewer system serving the District. Table 1. Flow Way Community Development District Proposed Facilities and Services FACILITY FUNDED BY O & M BY OWNERSHIP Drainage CDD CDD CDD Water /Sewer CDD County County Roadways /Street Lighting CDD CDD CDD Recreation CDD CDD CDD Mitigation CDD CDD CDD Landscaping CDD CDD CDD The petitioner has estimated the design and development costs for providing the capital facilities outlined in Table 2. The cost estimates are shown in Table 2 below. Total design and development costs for these facilities are estimated to be approximately $55,694,575. The District may issuE special assessment or other revenue bonds to fund the development of these facilities. These bond! would be repaid through non ad valorem assessments levied on all properties in the District that ma} benefit from the District's capital improvement program as outlined in Table 2. Prospective future landowners in the District may be required to pay non -ad valorem assessment levied by the District to secure the debt incurred through bond issuance. In additional to the levy o non ad valorem assessments for debt service, the District may also impose a non ad valorerr assessment to fund the operations maintenance of the District and its facilities and services. Furthermore, locating in the District by new residents is completely voluntary. So, ultimately, al owners and users of the affected property choose to accept the non -ad valorem assessments a! tradeoff for the numerous benefits and facilities that the District provides. Exhibit 9 Page 4 of 5 1 8 B A Community Development District ( "CDD ") provides residents with the option of having higher level of facilities and services financed through self - imposed charges. The District is an alternative mean to finance necessary community services. District financing is no more expensive, and often les expensive, than the alternatives of a municipal service taxing unit (MSTU), a neighborhoo( association, County provision, or through developer equity and /or bank loans. In considering these costs it shall be noted that occupants of the lands to be included within the District will receive three major classes of benefits. First, those residents and businesses in the District will receive a higher level of public services an+ amenities sooner than would otherwise be the case. Second, a CDD is a mechanism for assuring that the community services and amenities will bi completed concurrently with development of lands within the District. This satisfies the revise growth management legislation, and it assures that growth pays for itself without undue burden oi other consumers. Establishment of the District will ensure that these landowners pay for the provisioi of facilities, services and improvements to these lands. Third, A CDD is the sole form of governance which allows District landowners, through landowne voting and ultimately electoral voting for resident elected boards, to determine the type, quality any expense of District services they receive, provided they meet the County's overall requirements. The cost impact on the ultimate landowners in the District is not the total cost for the District t, provide infrastructure services and facilities. Instead, it is the incremental costs above what th landowners would have paid to install infrastructure via an alternative financing mechanism. Give the low cost of capital for a CDD, the cost impact to landowners is negligible. This incremental cost c the high quality infrastructure provided by the District is likely to be fairly low. Table 2. Cost Estimate for District Facilities CATEGORY COST Roadways = Land Clearing $ 1,547,825 Utilities $ 10,887,143 Infrastructure $ 7,524,168 Mitigation & Acquisition $ 7,000,000 Water Management System $ 13,427,892 Landscape $ 5,663,890 Engineering $ 5,568,689 Permitting $ 844,441 Contingency $ 3,105,409 TOTAL $ 55,694,575 Table 3. Probable Cost Estimate and Estimated Timetable. Attached is Table 3, which is an estimate of probable costs and timetable of improvements. I . Exhibit 9 Pa 8of 5 o 4 5.0 An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.5 and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Sectic 120.52, F.S. There will be no impact on small business because of the formation of the proposed District. anything, the impact may be positive. This is because the District must competitively bid all of i contracts. This affords small businesses the opportunity to bid on District work. Collier County has an estimated population (not incarcerated) in 1998 that is greater than 75,00, Therefore the County is not defined as a "small" county according to Section 120.52, F.S. 6.0 Any additional useful information. The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of economic theory, especiall as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory costs and benefits. Inputs were received from tt Developer's Engineer and other professionals associated with the Developer. Prepared by: 8B EXHIBIT 10 1, Robert G. Claussen, Managing Member of Mirasol Development L.L.C., hereby authorizes the following individuals as authorized agents in matters involving Mirasol Development L.L.C., and/or Flow Way Community Development District, and /or IMCOLLIER Joint Venture, with any Governmental Agency, including but not limited to Collier County Board of County Commissioners. Dr. Henry Fishkind Fishkind & Associates, Inc. 11869 High Tech Avenue Orlando, FL 32817 we Ms. Neale Montgomery, Esq. Pavese, Haverfield, Dalton, Harrison, Jensen, LLP. 1833 Hendry Street:, Ft. Myers, FL 33902 Executed this day, September 1, 2001 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER IMCOLLIER JOINT VENTURE, A Florida General Partnership, By: Mirasol Development, LLC A Florida Limited Liability Company, Managing Venturer BY. L �0&4-4� . Robert G. Claussen, Managing Member The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1 day of September, 2001, by Robert G. Claussen, Managing Member Mirasol Development LLC, on behalf of IMCOLLIER Joint Venture and/or Mirasol Development LLC. He is perVnally kry9vzw-to me. C0App� NOTARY �� z�PRY P(�B�i# JOHN R CC73069Z APR- 51 EXHIBIT 8 x L J 8 Z Op /"O co 6t a: / Q o In 200 4M WAI 1.- 2000. -0• C) U MIRASOL co ca ui cc V W � � n O T="G .mwoiatM I. �. o a a..o.w a..m. IMMOMLEE ROAD (CR 846) ,�„ ".: o,'�' ' ., MIRASOL FLOW —WAY FLOW —FAY CO"ONBNTS LL I HAIL O' 7 rs Mm r ac A ,r. 8B 44 A .4 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RE: PROPOSED ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO ) SECTION 190.005 (2), FLORIDA STATUTES ) TO ESTABLISH THE FLOW WAY ) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ) PETITION TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MIRASOL DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., (hereinafter "Petitioner "), by and through its undersigned attorney, hereby petitions the Collier County Board of County Commissioners to adopt an ordinance: 1) establishing and recognizing a Community Development District (hereinafter "District ") pursuant to the Uniform Community Development District Act of 1980, Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, as amended; 2) acknowledging the uniform district charter contained in Sections 190.006 through 190.041 as provided by Section 190.004(4), Florida Statutes, establishing the District on the property described herein within which the District may manage and finance its basic infrastructure systems, facilities and services as provided in its charter; and 3) designating the initial District Board of Supervisors. In support of this petition, Petitioner states: 1. Location and Size. The proposed District is located entirely within unincorporated Collier County, Florida. Exhibit 1 depicts the general location of the project. The proposed district covers approximately 830 acres of land. The site is C: \DOCUME— I \HEATHG —I \LOCALS —I\ Temp \RevisedPetitionforCDD2.doe Pagel of 8 Or- 8B 'I located in portions of Section 15 and Section 22, near the intersection of CR 951 and Immokalee Road. The metes and bounds description of the external boundaries of the District is set forth in Exhibit 2. 2. Excluded Parcels. There are no parcels within the external boundaries of the proposed District, which are to be excluded from the District. 3. Landowner Consent. At the time of filing this Petition, all of the land to be included in the District is owned by IMCOLLIER Joint Venture. Petitioner has obtained written consent to establish the District in accordance with Section 190.005, F.S. Documentation of this consent is contained in Exhibit 3. 4. Initial Board Members. The five persons designated to serve as the initial members of the Board of Supervisors of the proposed District is as follows: Christopher G. Claussen 2074 Sevilla Way Naples. FL 34109 Jack Sterling 3221 64`h St. SW Naples, FL 34105 Bruce Bowers 1205 Pocantico Lane Naples FL 34110 Mark Alderuccio 5425 Park Central Court Naples, FL 34109 Thomas Barrett 132 -204 Pebble Shores Drive Naples, FL 34110 F. \PMS- CORP\COMPANY\Claussen\ MirasoPcdd- PETITION'RevisedPetitionfo CDD2.doc Page 2 8 All of the above - listed persons are residents of the State of Florida, and citizens of the United States of America. 5. Name. The proposed name of the District is the "Flow Way Community Development District." 6. Existing Zoning_ Currently, the lands to be included within the District are zoned PUD. Neighboring lands are principally zoned PUD and AG, as shown in Exhibit 4. 7. Future Land Uses. The future general distribution, location, and extent of the public and private land uses proposed for the District by future land use plan element of the County's Future Land Use Plan is identified on Exhibit 5. The construction of approximately up to 799 residential dwelling units, recreational areas, 36 holes of golf, clubhouse, a swimming and fitness facility, a tennis facility, and a network of trails and parks are authorized for the portions of the development to be included within the District. Development is projected to occur over an estimated 8 -year period. The proposed land uses for the lands contained within the proposed District are consistent with the approved Collier County Future Land Use Plan. 8. Major Water and Wastewater Facilities. Exhibit 6 shows the major trunk water mains and wastewater interceptors within the currently undeveloped lands proposed to be included within the District. A portion of the storm water run -off will be reclaimed for golf course irrigation. It is currently proposed that Collier County will provide water and sewer service to the lands within the District. F:�PMS CORPCOMPANY�Cl aussen�Ivlirasolcdd- PETIIION�RevisedPeti tionforCDD2.doc Page 3 F 8B t,-, 9. District Facilities and Services. Exhibit 7, attached hereto, depicts the type of facilities the Petitioner presently expects the District to finance, construct and install from approximately 2001 -2008. The estimated costs of construction are also described in Exhibit 7. Actual construction timetables and expenditures will likely vary, due in part to the effects of future changes in the economic conditions upon costs such as labor services materials interest rates, and market conditions. 10. Mitigation lands for the project in Sections 10 and 15 and to the east of Section 10. The District shall have the authority, pursuant to Section 190.012 (1)(f), Florida Statutes, to exercise all powers under the Act with regard to the mitigation lands depicted as the "Upland Preserve" and "Wetland Preserve" areas on attached Exhibit 8. These mitigation lands are in addition to the mitigation lands located within the boundaries of the District and perpetual maintenance and monitoring is required by the South Florida Water Management District as a condition of Environmental Resource Permit (Application No. 000518 -10). These areas are necessary to construct the public and private land uses identified in Exhibit 5. The District shall comply with all the conditions in the permit issued pursuant to Application 000518 -10 regarding the perpetual maintenance and monitoring of the mitigation areas as depicted in Exhibit 8. 11. Chain (or ribbon) of lakes. The District shall have the authority, pursuant to Section 190.012 (1)(a), Florida Statutes, to exercise all powers under the Act on the water management improvements depicted as the "Flow Way Conveyance" on attached Exhibit 8. These water conveyance improvements provide the necessary legal positive outfall to drain the land uses within the District. These conveyances are also a condition F. \PMS- CORP\COMPANY\Ciaussen\Mirasol\ cdd- PEn 'nOMRevisedPetitionforCDD2.doc Page 4 8 B for the issuance of the South Florida Water Management District to obtain the Environmental Resource Permits (Applications No. 000518 -10, 010419 -6 and 970923- 12) required for the lands within the District. As part of the reasonable assurances granted to the South Florida Water Management District for the referenced Environmental Resource Permit applications, the District shall comply with all the necessary and required permit conditions in the permits associated with the referenced applications, requiring perpetual maintenance and operation of the Flow Way Conveyance area as depicted in Exhibit 8. To insure that the District has the authority to exercise its powers on all of the water management improvements located outside the geographical boundaries of the District, it has been granted a Drainage Ingress /Egress and Maintenance Easement from the adjacent landowners (Olde Cypress Development, Ltd., and Robert Vocisano, Trustee) over which a portion of these water management improvements are located which is attached as Exhibit 8A. These entities are not located within nor a part of the District, however, in order for Petitioner and these adjacent landowners to obtain their Environmental Resource Permits, the District was required to accept responsibility over the maintenance responsibilities for the Flow Way Conveyance set forth in Exhibit 8. 12. Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs. Exhibit 9 is the statement of estimated regulatory costs ( "SERC ") prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541. Florida Statutes (1997). The SERC is based upon presently available data. The data and methodology used in preparing the SERC, accompany it. F. \PMS- CORP\COMPAN11Clat usen\M irasoT\ cdd- PETMOMRevisedPetitionforCDD2 .doc Page 5 " 8B "1 13. Authorized Agent. The Petitioner, Mirasol Development, L.L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Company, is authorized to do business in Florida. The authorized agent for the Petitioner is: Robert G. Claussen 6025 Carlton Lakes Blvd. Naples, FL 34110 See Exhibit 10 — Authorization of Agent. Copies of all correspondence and official notices should also be sent to: Dr. Henry Fishkind Fishkind & Associates, Inc. 11869 High Tech Avenue Orlando, FL 32817 And: Ms. Neale Montgomery, Esq. Pavese, Haverfield, Dalton, Harrison, & Jensen, L.L.P. P.O. Drawer 1507 Ft. Myers, FL 33902 -1507 14. This petition to establish the Flow Way Community Development District should be granted for the following reasons: A. Establishment of the District and all land used and services planned within the proposed District are not inconsistent with applicable elements or portions of the effective State Comprehensive Plan or the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. B. The area of land within the proposed District is part of a planned community. It is of a sufficient size and is sufficiently compact and contiguous to be developed as one functional and interrelated community. F: \PMS- CORMOMPANY\Claussen\ Mirasolcdd- PETITIO "evisedPetitionforCDD2.doc Page 6 . egg C. The establishment of the District will prevent the general body of taxpayers in Collier County from bearing the burden for installation of the infrastructure and the maintenance of certain facilities with the development encompassed by the District. The District is the best alternative for delivering community development service and facilities to the proposed community without imposing an additional burden on the general population of the local general- purpose government. Establishment of the District in conjunction with a comprehensively planned community, as proposed, allows for a more efficient use of resources. D. The community development services and facilities of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and use of existing local and regional community development services and facilities. In addition, the establishment of the District will provide a perpetual entity capable of malting reasonable provisions for the operation and maintenance of the District's services and facilities. E. The area to be served by the proposed District is amenable to separate special- district government. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the County Commission of Collier County, Florida to: 1. Direct its staff to schedule a public hearing in accordance with the requirements of Section 190.005 (2) (b). Florida Statutes (1997); F.\PMS -CORPv COMPANYV Claussen\ MirasoAcdd- PEnIIOMRevisedPetitionforCDD2 .doc Page 7 2. Grant the petition and adopt an ordinance to establish the District pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes; 3. Consent to the District's exercise of certain additional special powers to plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate and maintain additional systems and facilities for: (i) parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses; and (ii) security, including, but not limited to, guard- houses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion- detection systems, and patrol cars, when authorized by proper governmental agencies; except that the district may not exercise any police power, but may contract with the appropriate local general- purpose government agencies for an increased level of such services within the District boundaries, all as authorized and described by Section 190.012 (2)(a) and (d), Florida Statutes. 2002. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 1-5 ji- day of By: harles Mann for Neale Montgomery Pavese, Haverfield, Dalton, Harrison & Jensen, L.L.P. 1833 Hendry Street P.O. Drawer 1507 Fort Myers, FL 33902 -1507 Representatives for the Petitioner F. \PMS- CORP\COMPANY\Claussen\Mirasol\ cdd- PE17T [O"evisedPetitionforCDD2.doc Page 8 r, g g " List of Exhibits for PETITION TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT DISTRICT (Flow Way CDD) Exhibit 1, Depicts the general location of the project Exhibit 2, The metes and bounds description of the external boundaries of the district Exhibit 3, Documentation of consent of landowners Exhibit 4, A map showing existing land use and zoning information within and adjacent to the proposed District Exhibit 5, The future general distribution, location, and extent of the public and Private land uses proposed for the District by future land use plan element of the County's Future Land Use Plan Exhibit 6, Major trunk water mains and wastewater interceptors within the currently undeveloped lands proposed to be included within the District Exhibit 7, Depiction of type of facilities to be built, and estimated timetable and costs of construction Exhibit 8, Mitigation Lands, Water management improvements Exhibit 9, Statement of estimated regulatory costs ( "SERC ") prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541. Florida Statutes (1997) Exhibit 10, Authorization of agent F: \WPDATA\NM \CCMS\List of Exhibits for petition.doc rd U 0 '01or!w9fe SITIVATIYEVA44111 •1SUI 1 [011"0 ITI F.II: oil 0 1 0) m 0 —I Z i 01 r- r 0 I ZE If C9 —' \— C10 —C1 LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING L1 990.31 89 8 "W L2 1332.41 0"10' "W L3 328.98 N89 7' 9" L4 1332.56 0 9 "W L5 655.72 S89'06'10 "W L6 1332.31 0 '06'47 "W L7 653.40 9 ,V 6" L8 1331.97 N01'00'48 "W L9 651.08 S89 '41 "W 1_10 2662.98 N00'59'06 "W L11 98 1118 9' L13 139.54 3 0' " L14 91112 76 '44 "W L15 38.87 N58 0'56 "W L16 75.67 51 L17 215.48 N71' "W 1_18 80.88 "W L19 74.98 5 9 "W L20 160.49 4 ' 0 "W L21 738.04 L22 2676.29 L23 1334.41 L24 1306.80 L25 2667.44 S01 L26 164.50 9'08' 3" L27 1333.63 01 '06" L28 1155.54 $89 *10' 4" C27 , g B C I N I C30 C35 -C37 N IT! 0 -i O z i _SECTION 15 SECTION 22 G �W 0 L5 z N I i I r; I I L3 I I I G P.O.B. G I 7ON H 1/4 CORNER i 22 I —. —. —. L1 L28 l� IMMOKALEE ROAD (S.R. 846) I I IN m I0 0 z �W I Q -11 -1� _woos` ARBER & ::manor DRUNDAGE, INC. Professional Engineers, Planners & Land Surveyors W kr c_lgg 7400 T-1—i T, ,l N. -N,pky FL- 3410E -Ph., (941) 397 - 1111 -Fm: 1941) 3" Lu Gw1y: 1613 R"dr S0a1- Fm: M)m, FL 3 3901 - Fh.: (941) 337. 3111. Fa: 19 411 33 411' Qrdfi.. of Amh9 ilniu" No4. LE 3661 ""d U 3664 FOR: J.D. NICEWONDER nTLE: METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FOR THE FLOW WAY CDD Line, Located In Portions of SECTIONS 22 815, T 48 S, R 26 E COLLIER COUNTY, FL. DRAWN BY: ROP ABB PROJECT No.: 7883 . _.. CHECKED BY: GPA ACAD FILE NAME: B074MB02 DATE: 09119101 COGO FILE No.: 7883.CGO SCALE: 1" a 1000' 1 SHEET I OF 3 EXHIBIT 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF NICEWONDER PROPERTY SOUTH A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 15 AND 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, 8B COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID PARCEL OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; Beginning at the South Quarter Comer of said Section 22; thence S.89'09'08 "W., a distance of 990.31 feet; thence N.01'10'06 "W., a distance of 1,332.41 feet; thence N.89'07'39 "E., a distance of 328.98 feet; thence N.01*12'59 "W., a distance of 1,332.56 feet; thence S.89'06'10 "W., a distance of 655.72 feet; thence N.01'06'47 "W., a distance of 1,332.31 feet; thence S.89'04'26 "W., a distance of 653.40 feet; thence N.01'00'48 "W., a distance of 1,331.97 feet; thence S.89'02'41 "W., a distance of 651.08 feet; thence N.00'59'06 "W., a distance of 2,662.98 feet; thence N.00'59'00 "W., a distance of 988.18 feet to the point of curve of a non tangent curve to the left, of which the radius point lies N.21'31'58 "W., a radial distance of 359.00 feet; thence northeasterly along the arc, through a central angle of 29'40'27 ", a distance of 185.93 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 381.00 feet and a central angle of 18'46'56 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 124.90 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 312.00 feet and a central angle of 27'38'40 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 150.54 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 1,988.00 feet and a central angle of 03'33'22 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 123.39 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 412.00 feet and a central angle of 35'06'17 "; thence northerly along the arc, a distance of 252.43 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet an a central angle of 2447'52 "; thence northerly along the arc, a distance of 81.37 feet; thence N.23'10'48 "E., a distance of 139.54 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 98.00 feet and a central angle of 107'41'02 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 184.18 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 53'55'06 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 199.50 feet; thence N.76'56'44 "E., a distance of 98.12 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 88.00 feet and a central angle of 44'42'20 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 68.66 feet; thence S.58'20'56 "E., a distance of 38.87 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of 112.00 feet and a central angle of 71'41'55 "; thenc easterly along the arc a distance of 140.15 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 225.00 feet and a central angle of 2855'44 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 113.60 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 27'20'10 "; thence northeasterly alon(. the arc, a distance of 101.15 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 38.00 feet and a central angle of 58'26'43 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 38.76 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 32'15'37 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 119.37 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet and a central angle of 23'02'51 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 75.62 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 46'44'53 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 172.97 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet and a central angle of 28'19'29 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 92.94 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 30'42'52 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 113.65 feet; thence N.51'38'22 "E., a distance of 75.67 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet and a centrc angle of 56'37'01 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 185.77 feet; thence S.71'44'38 "E., a distance of 215.48 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of 312.00 feet and a central angle of 15'36'30 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 84.99 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 138.00 feet and a central angle of 30'18'09 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 72.99 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 162.00 feet and a central angle of 38'42'28 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 109.44 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 138.00 feet and a central angle of 34'16'32 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 82.55 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 162.00 feet and a central angle of 32"18'53 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 91.37 feet; thence N.86'12'12 "E., a distance of 80.88 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 138.00 feet (SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR CONTINUATION) 1 __ l 14 1 1. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. * NOT A SURVEY 2. R.O.W. = RIGHT -OF -WAY. ■111■r 3. CURVE DIMENSIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 'ii1iAGNOLI 1111 1LT1 0 - DELTA, R - RADIUS, A - ARC, CH = CHORD, AND CHB = CHORD BEARING 4. BEARINGS ARE ASSUMED BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, BEING N 89'10'34" E. 5. TOTAL AREA = 829.74 ACRES MORE OR LESS. :::.0'"ARBER & 1111■■, ■1111■ C ■■■ ■ ■1. RUIVDAGE, INC. Professional Engineers, Planners & Land Surveyors CAB.. Csona7. 7400 T-1-i Tmil N. - Naplw, FL - 34101 • Ph.: (941) 19 7-3111 • Fu: (911) 3661: Las Cwm Y, 1631 H.,dq Smmt. Fwt M", FL 33901 Ph.: (9411337.3111 • F- 041) 3341 Cea .0 of Awk -i-6. Non. LB 3664 and EM 3664 """ J.D. NICEWONDER METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FOR THE FLOW WAY CDD Line, Located in Portions of SECTIONS 22 8 15, T 48 S, R 26 COLLIER COUNTY, FL. DRAWN BY: ROP ABB PROJECT No.: 883 CHECKED BY: GPA ACRD FILE NAME: 8074MB02 DATE: 09 19 01 COCO FILE No.: 7883.CGO SCALE: 1' 1000' SHEET 2 OF 3 EXHIBIT 2 CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA ITANGENT CHORD BEARING C1 359.00 185.93 29'40'27" 1 95.10 N5337'49 "E C2 381.00 124.90 18-46-56-1 63.01 S48'11'03 "W C3 312.00 150.54 27' 8'40" 76.76 N43'45'11 "E C4 1988.00 123.39 3'33'22" 61.71 S31'4 '32 "W C5 412.00 252.43 35'06'17" 130.32 N15'56'05`E C6 188.00 81.37 4'47'52" 41.33 S10'46'52 "W C7 98.00 184.19 107'41'02" 134,11 S77'01'19'W C8 212.00 199.50 53'55'06" 107.83 S76'05' 3 "E C9 88.00 68.66 4442'20" 36.19 N80'42'06`W C10 112.00 140.15 71' 1'55" 80.92 N85'48'06 "E Ctt 225.00 113.60 8'55' ' 58.04 S64 5'01 "W C12 212.00 101.15 27'20'10" 51.55 N65'12'47" C13 38.00 38.76 58'26*43"1 21.26 S80'46'04 "W C14 212.00 119.37 32'15'37" 61.31 S86'08'24 "E C15 188.00 75.62 23-02-51- 38.33 589'15' 3'W C16 212.00 172.97 46'44' 3" 91.63 N77'24'12` C17 188.00 92.94 8 9' 9" 47.44 S68'11'29'W C18 212.00 113.65 30'42'52" 58.22 N6659'48 "E C19 188.00 185.77 56'3io1" 101.26 S7956'52'W C20 312.00 84.99 5'36' 42.76 S7 '32'53" C21 138.00 72.99 30 6'09" 1 37.37 N7292'03 "W C22 162.00 109.44 8' 56.90 S76- 24 -13" C23 138.00 82.55 34'16'32" 42.55 78.37'11 C24 162.00 91.37 3' 46.93 S77'38' 2' C25 138.00 224.07 93 1' " 145.50 47'16'55'W C26 312.00 330.36 60' '03" 182.57 '04• C27 112.00 57.69 29W43" 29.50 S761 1' 7' C28 308.00 383.12 71'16'11" 220.79 98' C29 908.00 484.40 7" 1 241111 423'39' C30 112.00 134.34 6 ' 9" 1 76.58 -S23-28'25"E C31 512.00 333.98 37-22*29"l 173.18 S76'31' 4' C32 488.00 155.66 1816'33" 1 78.50 86 2'W C33 512.00 297.82 9 9" 153.25 86 4'05'E C34 488.00 178.15 20-5,V59- 90.08 80 '45 "W C35 212.00 94.41 253V56* 48.00 N77 53'47'E C36 1 588.00 1 217.08 9'09" 109.79 75'42'53` C37 1 103.00 1 54.98 0'35'07' 28.16 1 N70'59'54 "E • r � r FL (CONTINUED FROM SHEET 2 OF 3) and a central angle of 93'01'46 "; thence southeasterly along the arc a distance of 224.07 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 312.00 feet and a central angle of 60'40'03 "; thence southeasterly along the arc, a distance of 330.36 feet to a point of compound curve to the left having a radius of 112.00 feet and a central angle of 29'30'43 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 57.69 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 308.00 feet and a central angle of 71'16'11 "; thence southeasterly along the arc, a distance of 383.12 feet to a point of compound curve to the right having a radius of 908.00 feiet' and a central angle of 30'33'57 "; thence southerly along the arc, a distance of 484.39 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 112.00 feet and a central angle of 68'43'29 "; thence southeasterly along the arc, a distance of 134.34 feet; thence S.57'50'09 "E., a distance of 74.98 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of 512.00 feet and a central angle of 37'22'29 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 333.98 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 488.00 feet and a central angle of 18'16'33 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 155.66 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 512.00 feet and a central angle of 33'19'39 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 297.82 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 488.00 feet and a central angle of 20'54'59 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 178.15 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 25'30'56 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 94.41 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 588.00 feet and a central angle of 21'09'09 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 217.08 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 103.00 feet and a central angle of 30'35'07 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 54.98 feet; thence N.55'42'20 "E., a distance of 160.49 feet; thence S.01'43'53 "E., a distance of 738.04 feet; thence S.01'41'44 "E., a distance of 2,676.29 feet; thence S.01'42'40 "E., a distance of 1,334.41 feet; thence S.89104'26 "W., a distance of 1,306.80 feet; thence S.01'30'39 "E., a distance of 2,667.44 feet; thence S.89'08'23 "W., a distance of 164.50 feet; thence S.01'29'06 "E., a distance of 1,333.63 feet; thence S.89'10'34 "W., a distance of 1,155.54 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. ■111Hv Containing 829.74 acres, more or less; subject to easements and restrictions of record. * NOT A SURV- EY AGNOLI, BAR & BRUNDAGE, INC. Professional 61411neArs, Planners & Land Surveyors BY Guy P. Ad s, P.S.M. # 4390 C■■0 GNOLI !:::i'.BARBER & ■■■■■. ■■■■■I : RUNDAGE, INC. Professional Engineers, Planners & Land Surveyors Collierr -a :7400 Ta"laaiTn0 N.- Napka, FL •!4109 •P6.: 19�7)l97- ]111•Faa: 19/1)3661 L. C...,; 1623 H.adry 3"ea • Fan ",, M, FL 33901 • MM41) 337-3111 -Fm (9,1)3341 C-ifi.. of Aolhoriurion N- LB 3664 end EB 3664 IF": J.D. NICEWONDER METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FOR THE FLOW WAY CDD Line, Located In Portions of SECTIONS 22 81 15, T 46 S, R 26 COLLIER COUNTY, FL. EXHIBIT 2 f $B .4 EXHIBIT 3 Consent and Joinder of Landowners To Establishment of a Community Development District The undersigned is the owner of certain lands more fully described on Exhibit 2 attached hereto and made a pa hereof ( "Property "). The undersigned understands and acknowledges that Mirasol Development, L.L.C. ( "Petitioner ") intends to subrr an application to establish a Community Development District in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 190 c the Florida Statutes. As an owner of lands which are intended to constitute the Community Development District, the undersigne understands and acknowledges that pursuant to the provisions of Section 190.0005, Florida Statutes, th Petitioner is required to include the written consent to the establishment of the Community Development District c one Kindred percent (100 %) of the owners of the lands to be included within the Community Development District The undersigned hereby consents to the establishment of a Community Development District which will includ the Property within the lands to 'je part of the Community Development District and agrees to further execute an documentation necessary or convenient to evidence this consent and joinder during the application process for th, establishment of the Community Development District. The undersigned acknowledges that the consent will remain in full force and effect until the Communit Development District is established or three years from the date hereof, which ever shall first occur. Thi undersigned further agrees that it will provide to the next purchaser or successor in interest of all or any portion c the Property a copy of this consent form obtain, if requested by Petitioner, a consent to establishment of the Community Development District in substantially this form. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that it has taken all actions and obtained all consents necessar to duly authorize the execution of this consent and joinder by the officer executing this instrument. Executed this day, September 1, 2001 IMCOLLIER JOINT VENTURE, A Florida General Partnership, By: Mirasol Development, LLC A Florida Limited Liability Company, Managing Venturer BY: Robe G. Claussen, Managing Member STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1 day of September, 2001, by Robert G. Claussen, Managing Member, on behalf of the Landowners. He is per §pnally_ knowi OF IAL NOT SEAS t P R y P U a � i JOHN JS JERLING O 0 COUN rye mug" Q OWWW"92 w` �O �+( coMMSS1oNs1ES -FA ��0� APR. 5,2002 me. - ---- •— •--- •- '------------ - - - - -- ------------ — - — — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - - - -• -- — -- 04 04 L -T ---- --------------- ---- ------- --------------------- ---- Oil N .4 1H ti I CM c,j %Jv 7TIZ C== rcV • - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — - — -- w +1 o z CD U') 006 J V CN UL co -------E----------•- r ci Za r a Z IL Z t w 0 0 u� d �0 D 0 LU 0 LLI Zrjl:EZ LLI 1 0 CL co CL W w Ull -fk) U. .4 1H ti I CM c,j %Jv 7TIZ C== ai eta ads • o ai eta ads iff o ly W m w T 46 S I T 41 S I T 48 S I T 49 S I T 50 S I T 51 S I T 52 S I T 53 S W ul g M 0p� w ° - a a a- a n p ul - z W no k W K aW wS$ a i o;o x H 2 -J a z B N go �w.3i d. ZOma i a$'o w N i j 2 U S m 0 S u�amj W <oSioS< z w z W y �o 5w i jlli li ll71 N W N = � W n � J a M M6Y YY1w YYW6 O I.j_;_I W U y W w W 0 LO lD N �I ♦� a � x5. OL - LYl ]Iw A' O iw W Lid W Q/ I 6118 YM'Y N c 1 ..i L/1 w S 9v 1 i �1r1 l I i( I Li W J F � 4 S� a a w o z IX Q 4 O F z I S 6V 1 S 09 1 W M W I M M 2 a Z y W T O 2 0 Z d M � J M M6Y YY1w YYW6 O I.j_;_I U W w W CD OL - LYl ]Iw A' O iw ] Q/ I 6118 YM'Y 1 ..i L/1 w W 1 - IZ� W od gd W F x vl d os .� ¢ e,e ga N Y 4 W �G dW S LV 1 I S B4 1 j I Li W J F � 4 S� a a w o z IX Q 4 O F z I S 6V 1 S 09 1 W M W I M M 2 a Z y W T O 2 0 Z d M i1 I 9 ] 4 W W a � N a8T _i S l9 1 j S Z9 1 I S E5 1 M M6Y YY1w YYW6 W CD a ] L/1 w W 1 IZ� W W F x vl d W j w 1 ¢ N Y 4 W 1 1 � 1 b W k co N \'VI, r W w �rc ku N 1 1' I � i yy J d � o N a I ✓ tj i1 I 9 ] 4 W W a � N a8T _i S l9 1 j S Z9 1 I S E5 1 111 i .r. Page 2 of 8BJ ,, a. Presently developed sites; b. Sites where water - dependent or water - related uses have been previously established; C. Sites where shoreline improvements are in place; d. Sites where damage to viable, naturally functioning wetlands, or other envirormentally sensitive features, could be minimized. Port of the Islands is a unique development, which is located within the Urban Designated Area, but is also totally within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern. However, a portion of the development was determined "vested" by the State of Florida, thus exempting it from the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Further, there is an existing Development Agreement between Port of the Islands, Inc. and the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs dated July 2, 1985, which regulates land uses at Port of the Islands. Port of the Islands is eligible for all provisions of the Urban - Mixed Use District in which it is located to the extent that the overall residential density and commercial intensity does not exceed that permitted under zoning at time of adoption of this Plan. Exhibit 5 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. This Subdistrict comprises approximately 93,000 acres and 80% of the Urban Mixed Use District. Maximum eligible residential density shall be determined through the Density Rating System but shall not exceed 16 dwelling units per acre except in accordance with the Transfer of Development Rights Section of the Land Development Code. (IV) 2. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict • The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the Conservation Designated Area and the Urban Designated Area. It includes that area south of US 41 between the City of Naples and Collier- Seminole State Park, including Marco Island and comprises approximately 18,000 acres and 15% of the Urban Mixed Use District. In order to facilitate hurricane evacuation and to protect the adjacent environmentally sensitive Conservation Designated Area, residential densities shall be limited to a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre, except as allowed in the Density Rating System to exceed 4 units per acre through provision of Affordable Housing and Transfer of Development Rights, and except as provided in the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay. Rezones are recommended to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development. The Marco Island Master Plan shall provide for density, intensity, siting criteria and specific standards for land use districts on Marco Island. 3. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the Urban Designated Area and the Agricultural /Rural Area and comprises approximately 5,500 acres and 5% of the Urban Mixed Use District. Residential land uses may be allowed at a maximum density of 1.5 units per gross acre, subject to the following conditions: and are not subject to the Density Rating System: a. All rezones are encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development; and b. Proposed development in the area shall be fully responsible for all necessary water management improvements, including the routing of all on -site and appropriate off -site water through the project's water management system, and a fair share cost of necessary improvements to the CR 951 canal /out -fall system made necessary by new development • in the area. 19 (IV) = Plan Amendment CP- 2000 -1 adopted by Ordinance No. 2000 -87 on December 12, 2000 Exhibit S �ag 3 � 3 8 the asphalt plant: is compatible with surrounding land uses; is not located in a County, State or Federal jurisdictional wetland area and any required buffer zones; is not located within • 1,000 feet of a Florida State Park; is not located within the Area of Critical State Concern as depicted on the Future Land Use Map; and, is not located within 1,000 feet of a natural reservation I. Commercial uses accessory to other permitted uses, such as restaurant accessory to golf course or retail sales of produce accessory to farming, so long as restrictions or limitations are imposed to insure the commercial use functions as an accessory, subordinate use. Such restrictions or limitations could include limiting the size and /or location of the commercial use and /or limiting access to the commercial use; m. Commercial uses, within the Rural Commercial Subdistrict, based upon criteria; n. Industrial uses within the Rural - Industrial District; o. Travel trailer recreational vehicle parks, provided the following criteria are met: 1. The density is consistent with the Land Development Code; 2. The site has direct principal access to a road classified as an arterial in the Traffic Circulation Element, direct principal access defined as a driveway and /or roadway connection to the arterial road, with no access points from intervening properties; and, 3. The use will be compatible with surrounding land uses. (1) A. Agricultural /Rural - Mixed Use District The purpose of this District is to protect and encourage agricultural activities, conserve and preserve environmentally sensitive areas, provide for low density residential development, and other uses identified under the Agricultural /Rural Designation. These areas generally lack public facilities and services. Urbanization is not promoted, therefore most allowable land uses are of low intensity in an effort to maintain and promote the rural character of these lands. Residential uses ®are allowed as follows, subject to the Interim Development Provisions: a. Low density residential dwelling units, at a maximum density of one dwelling unit per five gross acres, except for legal non - conforming lots of record., b. Dormitories, duplexes and other staff housing, as may be provided in conjunction with conservation uses, at a density in accordance with the Land Development Code; C. Group housing uses at a density in accordance with that permitted in the Land Development Code; d. Staff housing in conjunction with safety service facilities and essential services, at a density in accordance with the Land Development Code; e. Farm labor housing in accordance with the Farm Labor Housing provision in the Land Development Code; f. Recreation camps as defined in, and at the density allowed by, the Land Development Code. g. Existing units approved for the Fiddler's Creek DRI may be reallocated to those parts of Sections 18 and 19, Township 51 South, Range 27 East added to Fiddler's Creek DRI together with part of Section 29, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, at a density greater than 1 unit per 5 gross acres provided that no new units are added to the 6,000 previously approved units, which results in a gross density of 1.6 units per acre for the Fiddler's Creek DRI; and further provided that no residential units shall be located on that part of Section 29 within the Fiddler's Creek DRI; and further provided that South Florida Water Management District jurisdictional wetlands impacted by the DRI in said Sections do not exceed 10 acres. (1) 1. Rural Commercial Subdistrict Within the Agricultural /Rural - Mixed Use District, commercial development, up to a maximum • of 200 acres, may be allowed providing the following standards for intensity of use are met and subject to the Interim Development Provisions: a. The project, or that portion of a larger project, which is devoted to commercial 35 i O O W N T T lw N Cl) co O ON) S co O IT C i act O CC) CO CO V ene� � Iq O ' n CO 00 u )C1 COO IN C1 S � COL) S .- O n fl- CO) u) u6 69 v d9 Tdi 6'i di 69 69 6 O r- CO CO T s cn S C � 11 O 0o ri r- .- ui v ti 1` h M N N 6 N T EH di � 63 64 1 01 co O O N CO CI i S S S O S G 1 Ci v O u) CO C COO O r M e d� I /fl 69 d9 d 49 N T un O to u � N rn q �tDr1 n c I M ON v oo 0 o n c°c N r e= C N .- 69 to 64 69 69 ui 69 t91 COO O N S C'O 0) S C i lr1 R) r o O O CO O e� r- co O sOs� O co N S CD v CA Ot fa � � d E9 E co co 1- S n S o r co 1` 'T O O r S D OOO C S CCl co N r Vi 69 Z } O C0 w 5 w Z ¢ o > Z z w Z c7 2 o a z u U W Q Q W Z a � g w d E� w `- N M V' u) O ti w O �I N i k u y i i t Cl) F4- r 8n W �I N i k u y i i t Cl) F4- r 8n EXHIBIT 8 �' 8B , . ca r / Q /p/ o. , i+ /: N 0 ,000 200 4000 SCALE 1•_2000•-0 - Z�_� IN 0 W MIRASOL co co W v ct vs 4N n L2 <� p1+10 O T="U .mocisUft b. IMMOKALEE ROAD (CR 846) MIRASOL FLOW -WAY PLOY - /AY COYPONSHM Lt R1�1 NME � 1 1.0 1.1 Exhibit 9 STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS Introduction Purpose and Scope Page 1 of 5 r 8B This Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs ( "SERC ") supports the petition to form the Flow Way Community Development District ( "District "). The proposed District comprises approximately 950 acres of land located in Collier County, Florida. The limitations on the scope of.this SERC are explicitly set out in Section 190.002(2)(d), F.S. (governing District formation or alteration) as follows: "That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general law shall be fair and based one on factors material to managing and financing the service delivery function of the district, so that any matter concerning permitting or planning of the development is not material or relevant (emphasis added.)" 1.2 Overview of the Flow Way Community Development District The District is designed to provide community infrastructure, services, and facilities along with their operations and maintenani:e, to the proposed Mirasol development. Flow Way Community Development District will be an upscale, fully amenitized, residential golf course community. The proposed development plan for the lands within the District include the construction of up to 799 single family residential dwelling units, recreational areas, 36 holes of golf, a golf clubhouse, a swim and fitness facility, a tennis facility, and a network of trails and parks, is authorized for portions of the development to be included within the District. 1.3 Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs Section 120.541(2), F.S. (1997), defines the elements a statement of estimated regulatory costs must contain: "(a) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the rule. (b) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues. (c) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities, including local governmental entities, required to comply with the requirements of the rule. As used in this paragraph, ' transactional costs are direct costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard business practices, and include filing fees, the cost of obtaining a license, the cost of equipment required to be installed or used or procedures required to be employed in complying with the rule, additional operating costs incurred, and the cost of monitoring and reporting. r 8B Exhibit 9 Page 2 of 5 (d) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. Collier County is not defined as a small county for purposes of this requirement. , (e) Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful. (f) In the statement or revised statement, whichever applies, a description of any good faith written proposal submitted under paragraph (1) (a) and either a statement adopting the alternative or a statement of the reasons for rejecting the alternative in favor of the proposed rule. 2.0 A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with fiche ordinance, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance. As noted above, Flow Way Community Development District is a residential community designed for up to 799 total residential units. Formation of the proposed District would put all of these households under the jurisdiction of the proposed District. 3.0 Good Faith estimate of the cost to state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues. 3.1 Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance State Governmental Entities There will be only modest costs to various State governmental entities to implement and enforce the proposed formation of the District. The District has fewer than 1,000 acres, so Collier County is the establishing entity under 190.005 (2). F.S. The modest costs to various State entities to implement and enforce the proposed ordinance relate strictly to the receipt and processing of various reports that the proposed District is required to file with the State and its various entities. Appendix A lists the reporting requirements. The costs to those State agencies that will receive and process the District's reports are very small, because the District is only one of many governmental units that are required to submit the various reports. Therefore, the marginal cost of processing one additional set of report is inconsequential. Additionally, pursuant to section 189.412, F.S., the proposed district must pay an annual fee to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs, which offsets such costs. Collier County Since the proposed District i7, in Collier County and consists of less than 1,000 acres, Collier County and its staff will process, analyze and vote upon the petition to establish the District. These activities will absorb some resources. Furthermore, even these costs to the County are modest for a number of reasons. First, review of the petition to establish the District does not include analysis of the project itself. Second, the petition itself provides much of the information needed for a staff review. Third, local governments routinely Exhibit 9 Page 3 of 5 process similar petitions for land uses and zoning changes that are far more complex than is the petition to establish a community development district. ' 18 3.2 Impact on State and Local Revenues Adoption of the proposed ordinance will have no negative impact on State or local revenues. The District is an independent unit of local government. It is designed to provide community facilities and services to serve the Mirasol development project. It has its own sources of revenue. No State or local subsidies are required or expected. In this regard it is important to note than any debt obligations incurred by the District to construct its infrastructure, or for any other reason, are not debts of the State of Florida or any unit of local government. In accordance with State law, debts of the District are strictly its own responsibility. 4.0 A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities required to comply with the requirements of the ordinance. Table 1 provides an outline of the various facilities and services the proposed District may provide. The drainage facilities will all be funded, operated and owned by the District. The District will also fund the construction of the water and sewer distribution system. However, the County will own and operate the water and sewer system serving the District. Table 1. Flow Way Community Development District Proposed Facilities and Services FACILITY FUNDED BY O & M BY OWNERSHIP Drainage CDD CDD CDD Water /Sewer CDD County County Roadways /Street Lighting CDD CDD CDD Recreation CDD CDD CDD Mitigation CDD CDD CDD Landscaping CDD CDD CDD The petitioner has estimated the design and development costs for providing the capital facilities outlined in Table 2. The cost estimates are shown in Table 2 below. Total design and development costs for these facilities are estimated to be approximately $55,694,575. The District may issue special assessment or other revenue bonds to fund the development of these facilities. These bonds would be repaid through non ad valorem assessments levied on all properties in the District that may benefit from the District's capital improvement program as outlined in Table 2. Prospective future landowners in the District may be required to pay non -ad valorem assessments levied by the District to secure the debt incurred through bond issuance. In additional to the levy of non ad valorem assessments for debt service, the District may also impose a non ad valorem assessment to fund the operations maintenance of the District and its facilities and services. Furthermore, locating in the District by new residents is completely voluntary. So, ultimately, all owners and users of the affected property choose to accept the non -ad valorem assessments as tradeoff for the numerous benefits and facilities that the District provides. Exhibit 9 Page 4 of 5 1 8B A Community Development District ( "CDD ") provides residents with the option of having higher levels of facilities and services financed through self - imposed charges. The District is an alternative means to finance necessary community services. District financing is no more expensive, and often less expensive, than the alternatives of a municipal service taxing unit (MSTU), a neighborhood association, County provision, or through developer equity and /or bank loans. In considering these costs it shall be noted that occupants of the lands to be included within the District will receive three major classes of benefits. First, those residents and businesses in the District will receive a higher level of public services and amenities sooner than would otherwise be the case. Second, a CDD is a mechanism for assuring that the community services and amenities will be completed concurrently with development of lands within the District. This satisfies the revised growth management legislation, and it assures that growth pays for itself without undue burden on other consumers. Establishment of the District will ensure that these landowners pay for the provision of facilities, services and improvements to these lands. Third, A CDD is the sole form of governance which allows District landowners, through landowner voting and ultimately electoral voting for resident elected boards, to determine the type, quality and expense of District services they receive, provided they meet the County's overall requirements. The cost impact on the ultimate landowners in the District is not the total cost for the District to provide infrastructure services and facilities. Instead, it is the incremental costs above what the landowners would have paid to install infrastructure via an alternative financing mechanism. Given the low cost of capital for a CDD, the cost impact to landowners is negligible. This incremental cost of the high quality infrastructure provided by the District is likely to be fairly low. Table 2. Cost Estimate for District Facilities CATEGORY COST Roadways Land Clearing $ 1,547,825 utilities $ 10,887,143 Infrastructure $ 7,524,168 Mitigation & Acquisition $ 7,000,000 Water Management System $ 13,427,892 Landscape $ 5,663,890 Engineering $ 5,568,689 Permitting $ 844,441 Contingency $ 3,105,409 TOTAL $ 55,694,575 Table 3. Probable Cost Estimate and Estimated Timetable. Attached is Table 3, which is an estimate of probable costs and timetable of improvements. Exhibit 9 Page 5 of 5 Al 5.0 An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section AL403,, F.S.; and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. There will be no impact on small business because of the formation of the proposed District. If anything, the impact may be positive. This is because the District must competitively bid all of its contracts. This affords small businesses the opportunity to bid on District work. Collier County has an estimated population (not incarcerated) in 1998 that is greater than 75,000. Therefore the County is not defined as a "small" county according to Section 120.52, F.S. 6.0 Any additional useful information. The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of economic theory, especially, as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory costs and benefits. Inputs were received from the Developer's Engineer and other professionals associated with the Developer. Prepared by: EXHIBIT 10 B '•4 1, Robert G. Claussen, Managing Member of Mirasol Development L.L.C., hereby authorizes the following individuals as authorized agents in matters involving Mirasol Development L.L.C., and/or Flow Way Community Development District, and /or IMCOLLIER Joint Venture, with any Governmental Agency, including but not limited to Collier County Board of County Commissioners. Dr. Henry Fishkind Fishkind & Associates, Inc. 11869 High Tech Avenue Orlando, FL 32817 and Ms. Neale Montgomery, Esq. Pavese, Haverfield, Dalton, Harrison, Jensen, LLP. 1833 Hendry Street:, Ft. Myers, FL 33902 Executed this day, September 1, 2001 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER IMCOLLIER JOINT VENTURE, A Florida General Partnership, By: Mirasol Development, LLC A Florida Limited Liability Company, Managing Venturer BY: Robert G. Claussen, Managing Member The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1 day of September, 2001, by Robert G. Claussen, Managing Member Mirasol Development LLC, on behalf of IMCOLLIER Joint Venture and/or Mirasol Development LLC. He is per9nally k_Wv�rto me. � r%-031 Y tN' Ve� �� , '► � J SEM J0H14 C306,9!2 WN p�5200 2 pp � „� FAO 186 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE FLOW WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (CDD) PURSUANT TO SECTION 190.005, FLORIDA STATUTES. BACKGROUND: This item was continued from the Board of County Commissioners meeting of February 12, 2002 The continuation was due to concerns raised by Ms. Nancy Payton of the Florida Wildlife Federation regarding the item and due to the fact that the Executive Summary package, as presented on February 12 2002 was missing several attachments. The current Executive Summate includes all relevant attachments. Since the initial resentation of the item Comprehensive Planning Section staff has worked with Ms Payton to address her concerns regarding the proposed CDD. Additionally, a South Florida Water Management District Environmental Resources Permit (ERP) application for the Flow Way Project has been approved The Corps of Engineers' Permit for the project has not vet been approved. OBJECTIVE: For the Board to review and consider a petition for the creation by County Ordinance of the Flow Way CDD. CONSIDERATIONS: On November 29, 2001, Mirasol Development, LLC filed a petition with John M. Dunnuck, Interim Administrator, Community Development and Environmental Services Division, for the establishment of the Flow Way CDD. A mandatory $15,000 application fee was submitted with the petition. The land area proposed to be served by the District is bounded on the north by undeveloped lands; on the south by Immokalee Road /CR 846; on the east by future right -of -way for County Road 951; and on the west by the Parklands, Terafina and Olde Cypress Developments. The proposed Flow Way CDD comprises approximately 830 contiguous acres. A map showing the location of the land area to be serviced by the District appears as Exhibit "1" to the petition (attached). The CDD area is part of a previously approved Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) known as "Mirasol ". The Mirasol Development will ultimately consist of up to 799 dwelling units, recreational areas, 36 holes of golf, a clubhouse, a swimming and fitness facility, a tennis facility, and a network of trails and parks. As of January 29, 2002, the date of advertising for the establishment of this CDD, no P.U.D. amendment petitions for this project had been filed with Collier County. 1 ri 86 By adopting the ordinance and granting the petition the Board of County Commissioners would authorize the District, through its Board of Supervisors, to manage and finance certain basic infrastructure for the benefit of the landowners and residents of the Mirasol Development. This infrastructure, under section 190.012(1), Florida Statutes, includes basic types of systems, facilities and services: water supply, sewers and wastewater management, water control and management (drainage), and roads, bridges and street lights. Upon consent by the County, and upon further petition by the District Board of Supervisors, if established, the District may exercise its additional charter powers pursuant to section 190.012(2), Florida Statutes. The District Board of Supervisors is initially elected for the first six years of the duration of this district in a property -based election (one -acre, one - vote), which has been specifically ruled constitutional (State of Florida v. Frontier Acres Community Development Dist., 472 So. 2d 455 (Fla. 1985)). By operation of law, in time, the Supervisors are elected on a one - person, one -vote basis. In order to provide the basic systems, facilities and services, the District has certain management and financing powers. It may only exercise those powers, however, if they comply with certain strict and detailed procedural requirements including ethics in government, disclosure, conflict of interest requirements, noticed meetings, government -in- the - sunshine conduct, accounting and reporting requirements to various local and state agencies, consultants' competitive negotiation procedures, competitive bidding procedures and others. Adoption of the GDD and eemplianee with these many pr-eeedur-al r-equir-effiefits, dees net, in ai+y way, allow the Distr-iet te manage and finatiee an), ef these sefviees and faeilities withet develepment ef the land, whether- leeal, fegienal, state ef fedefal in na�tffe, and whether- in f-efffi ef pokeies, laws, t:ules, Fegul4iens er- efdifianees, have been eefflplied with eefleenlipg development of the pfepefty. The Distfiet will net be used fef any pur-poses Othef than t eensistent with the authefity te develop the Planned UHit Development, beeause the distr-iet i the P.U.P. is ffianaged and finaneed in an effleient and eeenefnieal way. Finally, in efdef tE) has provided that the ehaftef ef the distr-iet, in the genefal statute itself-, fnay be alffiended efil The adoption of the CDD ordinance does not constitute a form of development approval. Adoption of the CDD and compliance with these many procedural requirements, does not, in any way, allow the District to manage and finance any of these services and facilities without a showing that all legitimate policies, constraints, authorities, controls, permits or conditions on the development of the land, whether local, regional, state or federal in nature, and whether in the form of policies, laws, rules, regulations or ordinances, have been complied with concerning development of the property. In essence, adoption of the CDD ordinance does not exempt the petitioner from compliance with any applicable local, 2 regional, state or federal permitting or regulatory processes. In this sense, the Community Development District is merely a mechanism to assure the county and the landowners of the district that the provision of infrastructure and services for the P.U.D. is managed and financed in an efficient and economical way. Finally, in order to prevent potential abuses of districts by landowners or by other local governments, the Legislature has provided that the charter of the district, in the general statute itself, may be amended only by the Legislature. In order to provide these systems, facilities and services, the District also is given certain eminent domain powers, within tight constraints, as well as the authority to require service charges, fees or taxes for the various services rendered, ranging from installation of capital facilities to long -term maintenance and repair. Without the County's consent by resolution the aforementioned eminent domain power is limited to the boundaries of the District. The District may also issue revenue and other user bonds as well as general obligation bonds. However, no general obligation bonds can be issued without a referendum and without a showing that the bond will not exceed 35 percent of the assessed valuation of the property within the District. Even with these safeguards and constraints, during the first six years of the District's existence, the board of supervisors shall not issue general obligation bonds unless the board first holds elections on a one - person, one -vote basis for a new board of supervisors. Accordingly, if Collier County adopts the ordinance, then it establishes the Flow Way Community Development District, whieh is as a management tool to benefit both Collier County's existing and future landowners with pinpointed responsibility for timely, efficient, reliable and flexible service provision without burdening the existing taxpayers and financial structure of Collier County. In addition, the District would be is also a financing tool, off the balance sheet of the County and the developer. It will provide long -range and sustained quality service to initial and subsequent landowners without burdening Collier County and its taxpayers. Finally, such a District may not outlive its practical utility and usefulness. If it ceases to function it will automatically be disbanded by state law. If at any time during its existence Collier County determines by a non - emergency ordinance that it can provide any one of the district services in a more economical manner, over the long term, at lower cost but with higher quality, Collier County may then take that service away from the district and provide the service itself. Section 190.005, Florida Statutes provides that the exclusive and uniform method for establishment of a CDD of less than 1,000 acres shall be by county ordinance. Section 190.005, Florida Statutes outlines the specific content required in the petition and further outlines six (6) factors for the Board of County Commissioners to consider in determining whether to grant or deny a petition for the establishment of a CDD, as follows: 1. Whether all statements contained within the petition have been found to be true and correct. 2. Whether the creation of the district is inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the state comprehensive plan or of the effective local government comprehensive plan. 3 3. Whether the area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community. 4. Whether the district is the best alternative available for delivering community development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district. 5. Whether the community development services and facilities of the district will be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development services and facilities. 6. Whether the area that will be served by the district is amenable to separate special- district government. County legal, planning, transportation and public works staffs have reviewed the petition and exhibits submitted by the petitioners (attached) relative to these six (6) factors and have found the proposed Flow Way CDD petitions to be compliant with each of the six (6) review factors. FISCAL IMPACT: As previously noted, a $15,000 filing fee was submitted with the petition. Exhibit "7" of the petition, "Flow Way Community Development District Summary of probable costs and Estimated Timetable" (attached) delineates the fiscal impacts and timing of impacts to be managed by the district. It is noteworthy that the estimated internal infrastructure and services to be financed by the Flow Way CDD is $55,569,457, consisting of land clearing, utilities, general infrastructure, land mitigation and acquisition, water management, landscaping, engineering, permitting and contingency funds. Roadways and utilities are ultimately to be transferred to County ownership. DISTRICT RESPONSIBILITIES: According to the petition the Flow Way Community Development District, if the ordinance is adopted will assume responsibility for the following: (1) General development of the approved uses within the District (2) Potable water, wastewater and stormwater facilities to support the approved development; (3) Items referenced in Exhibit 7 of the petition (attached); (4) Environmental mitigation activities as referenced in Exhibit 8 of the petition (attached); and, (5) Water management improvements associated with the "Flow Way Conveyance" shown in Exhibit 8 (attached). GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The 830± acres of the Flow Way CDD lies partially within the Urban Residential Sub - district and Agricultural/Rural Mixed Use District designations on the Future Land Use Map. Although the establishment of this district does not constitute any development approval, the plan of development previously approved for the subject property has been determined to be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). Accordingly, any future petitions for El 8B rezone or development permits will be subsequently reviewed at the time of submittal, and will be subject to the requirements and limitations specified in the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), and will be required to be consistent with the GMP in effect at that time. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt and enact the proposed ordinance establishing the Flow Way CDD (see Attached). Attachments: E PREPARED BY /15�� T- GLENN E. HEATH, AICP PRINCIPAL PLANNER REV EWED BAER, STAN LITSIN I C OMPREHENSIVE PLANNING MANAGER AU-SAN MURRAY, AICP PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMEN DIRECTOR APPROVED BY: JOSPq SCHMITT, ADMINISTRATOR COMMUNITY DEV. AND ENVIRONMENTAL SVCS. CDD EX SUMMARY /gh 6 r 8B ', j -zI -C DATE DATE oz -,;2 o ff DATE I;Flv N =I Gi _ ■ "' 'ii Jjj111��A�I J:l• •r.firrr• • , 1 •� SITITATIT�`_VA44 P)1 oIN!r I ISI \ ■ JI F:.I: 8 I I 1 1 1 i J i r 0 C9 J � C10 -C18 LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING Lt 990.31 'W L2 1332.41 N '1 'W L3 328.98 N '39' L4 1332.56 N01 '1 ` 9'W L5 655.72 S '06' 'W L6 1332.31 N 1 '47' L7 653.40 S89 *04'26'W L8 1331.97 N 1 'W L9 651.08 1'W L10 2662.98 N 'W 1-11 988.18 N 'S9'00'W L13 139.54 S 0' 'W L14 98.12 S76 '44'W L15 38.87 N 8 6'W L16 75.67 S51' 8' 'W L17 215.48 N71'44' ' L18 80.88 6 'W 1.19 74.98 N 0'09' L20 160.49 S 'W L21 738.04 0 ' ' L22 2676.29 L23 1334.41 L24 1 1306.80 9'O ' 6' L25 2667.44 S01 L26 164.50 9 8' 3'W L27 1333.63 S01"29'06.E L28 1155.54 S89'10' 4'W SECTION 15 C27 ke C30 8Q I I `I 54 G C35 -C37 N m t'1 -I 40 Z A G N SECTION 22 I I w u I L7 L24 I i rn I I m I L5 0 Z I Z N .Na I W I Q FYT7TRTT 'f AGNOLI I = SBARBER & ai :ii�BRUNDAGE, L3 INC. I. Professional Engineers, Planners & Land Surveyors Callkr C-q: 7400 T -W." 1N.•N.9k%FL• 34109. 1k: 1141) 317.3111•Fm 04H 36F110! Las r-m 1615Hn&y Sm- - F. My-FL 11901• M.: 19411717.3111 • Fm 041) 33- 17S C fl.. of Au6-i -W. Nom La 3664 and FS 7664 FOR: J.D. NICEWONDER I P.O.B. G n METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION I H 1/4 CORNER FOR THE FLOW WAY CDD Line, 22 Located in Portions of SECTIONS 22 315, T 48 S, R 26 E. i 7ON COLLIER COUNTY, FL. • L1 1,2g ..� • 4SCALE: RAWN BY: ROP ABB PROJECT No.: HECKED BY. CPA ACAD FlLE NAME: 8O74AIBO2 • - • • - . - . ROAD (S.R. 846) ATE: 09 19 O1 FlLE No.OF IMMOKALEE 1' a 1000' SHEET � SHEE FYT7TRTT 'f LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF NICEWONDER PROPERTY SOUTH ^ `� A A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 15 AND 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, 8 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID PARCEL OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; Beginning at the South Quarter Corner of said Section 22; thence S.89'09'08 "W., a distance of 990.31 feet; thence N.01'10'06 "W., a distance of 1,332.41 feet; thence N.89'07'39 "E., a distance of 328.9$ feet; thence N.01'12'59 "W., a distance of 1,332.56 feet; thence S.89'06'10 "W., a distance of 655.72 feet; thence N.01'06'47 "W., a distance of 1,332.31 feet; thence S.89'04'26 "W., a distance of 653.40 feet; thence N.01'00'48 "W., a distance of 1,331.97 feet; thence S.89'02'41 "W., a distance of 651.08 feet; thence N.00'59'06 "W., a distance of 2,662.98 feet; thence N.00'59'00 "W., a distance of 988.18 feet to the point of curve of a non tangent curve to the left, of which the radius point lies N.21'31'58 "W., a radial distance of 359.00 feet; thence northeasterly along the arc, through a central angle of 29'40'27 ", a distance of 185.93 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 381.00 feet and a central angle of 18'46'56 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 124.90 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 312.00 feet and a central angle of 2738'40 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 150.54 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 1,988.00 feet and a central angle of 03'33'22 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 123.39 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 412.00 feet and a central angle of 35'06'17. "; thence northerly along the arc, a distance of 252.43 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet and a central angle of 24'47'52 "; thence northerly along the arc, a distance of 81.37 feet; thence N.2310'48 "E., a distance of 139.54 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 98.00 feet and a central angle of 107'41'02 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 184.18 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 53'55'06 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 199.50 feet; thence N.76'56'44 "E., a distance of 98.12 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 88.00 feet and a central angle of 44'42'20 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 68.66 feet; thence S.58'20'56 "E., a distance of 38.87 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of 112.00 feet and a central angle of 71'41'55 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 140.15 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 225.00 feet and a central angle of 28'55'44 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 113.60 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 27'20'10 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 101.15 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 38.00 feet and a central angle of 58'26'43 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 38.76 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 32'15'37 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 119.37 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet and a central angle of 23'02'51 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 75.62 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 46'44'53 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 172.97 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet and a central angle of 28'19'29 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 92.94 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 30'42'52 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 113.65 feet; thence N.51'38'22 "E., a distance of 75.67 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet and a central angle of 56'37'01 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 185.77 feet; thence S.71'44'38 "E., a distance of 215.48 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of 312.00 feet and a central angle of 15'36'30 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 84.99 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 138.00 feet and a central angle of 30'18'09 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 72.99 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 162.00 feet and a central angle of 38'42'28 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 109.44 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 138.00 feet and a central angle of 34'16'32 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 82.55 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 162.00 feet and a central angle of 32'18'53 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 91.37 feet; thence N.86'12'12 "E., a distance of 80.88 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 138.00 feet (SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR CONTINUATION) GENERAL NOTES: 1. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. 2. R.O.W. = RIGHT -OF -WAY. 3. CURVE DIMENSIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: 0 = DELTA, R = RADIUS, A = ARC, CH = CHORD, AND CHB = CHORD BEARING 4. BEARINGS ARE ASSUMED BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, BEING N 89'10'34" E. 5. TOTAL AREA = 829.74 ACRES MORE OR LESS. * NOT A SURVEY 11JEJ[ RBER & 0■ ■=11BRUNDAGE, INC. Professional Engineers, Planners & Land Surveyors Cdikr Gmn: 74 T."i.". T,i1 N. • V.,I". FL .3 4100. "._ 941) 39]-3111 • Fa:941) sa6L'03 I.. C. -,: 1625 Hendry Sn •F - My— FL 33901- Mi(941)337-1l Ii - Fu: (941) 334-11]S Cwdfi. a of Ao.ho.iaa,ion N- LB 3664 and r9 3664 I FOR: J.D. NICEWONDER I METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FOR THE FLOW WAY CDD Line, Located In Portions of SECTIONS 22 815, T 48 S, R 26 E. COLLIER COUNTY. FL. _ EXHIBIT 2 CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS LENGTH DELTA ANGELA CHORD BEARING C1 359.00 185.93 29' 7` 95.10 N '3749" C2 381.00 124.90 8'46' 63.01 S VA-VIN C3 312.00 150.54 271a'40" 76.76 N43'45'11' C4 1988.00 123.39 3' 3' ' 61.71 S31'42'32"W CS 1 412.00 252.43 35106'1 r 130.32 N15'S8'05 "E C6 188.00 81.37 4'47' ' 41.33 S1 0'46'52 "W C7 98.00 184.19 107'41'0 " 134.11 S77'01'19'W C8 212.00 199.50 5355'06" 107.83 S76'05'43' C9 88.00 68.66 44'4 ' 0" 36.19 N80'4 '06 "W C10 112.00 140.15 71'41'55* 80.92 N85'48'06' C11 225.00 113.60 8'55'44" 58.04 S64-25'01 "W C12 212.00 101.15 ' 0' 51.55 N65 2'47' C13 38.00 38.76 58 6'43' 21.26 S80'46'04 "W C14 212.00 119.37 32'15'37* 61.31 S 6'08' 4' C15 188.00 75.62 1` 38.33 S89'1 '13'W C16 212.00 172.97 46 91.63 N77 4' " C17 188.00 92.94 79' 9" 47.44 S68'11' 9 "W cis 212.00 113.65 30'4 ' 2' 58.22 N6619'4 8'E C19 188.00 185.77 5637'01' 101.26 956'5 'W C20 312.00 84.99 15'36' 0" 42.76 579'3 '5 'E C21 138.00 72.99 3018,09" 37.37 N7 7 '03 "W C22 162.00 109.44 38-42-28- 56.90 S7624'1 3* C23 138.00 82.55 4'1 42.55 N7 •37' 1'W C24 162.00 91.37 '53' 46.93 S77'3 '2 ' C25 138.00 224.07 93'01'46" 145.50 N47'16'55 "W C26 312.00 330.36 $0,4010,3* 182.57 S31'06'04' C27 112.00 57.69 9'30' ` 29.50 S76 1'27"E C28 308.00 383.12 19 '11" 220.79 N 5 8'43 "W C29 908.00 484.40 • '57' 248.11 N04 9'W C30 112.00 134.34 68-43-2 9" 76.58 S23 ' C31 512.00 333.98 3722'29" 173.18 S76'31' 4' C32 488.00 155.66 18'16'33' 78.50 86'04' 'W C33 512.00 297.82 33'19'39' 153.25 86'24'05' C34 488.00 178.15 20 *54'59' 90.08 1'45'W C35 212.00 94.41 5'3 '56" 48.00 N77'53'47' C36 588.00 217.08 1'09109" 109.79 5754 'S "W C37 103.00 54.98 30'35'07" 28.16 N70'S9'54' (CONTINUED FROM SHEET 2 OF 3) and a central angle of 93'01'46 "; thence southeasterly along the arc a distance of 224.07 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 312.00 feet and a central angle of 60'40'03 "; thence southeasterly along the arc, a distance of 330.36 feet to a point of compound curve to the left having a radius of 112.00 feet and a central angle of 29'30'43 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 57.69 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 308.00 feet and a central angle of 71'16'11 "; thence southeasterly along the arc, a distance of 383.12 feet to a point of compound curve to the right having a radius of 908.00 feet' and a central angle of 30'33'57 "; thence southerly along the arc, a distance of 484.39 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 112.00 feet and a central angle of 68'43'29 "; thence southeasterly along the arc, a distance of 134.34 feet; thence S.57'50'09 "E., a distance of 74.98 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of 512.00 feet and a central angle of 37'22'29 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 333.98 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 488.00 feet and a central angle of 1816'33 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 155.66 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 512.00 feet and a central angle of 33'19'39 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 297.82 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 488.00 feet and a central angle of 20'54'59 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 178.15 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 25'30'56 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 94.41 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 588.00 feet and a central angle of 21'09'09 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 217.08 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 103.00 feet and a central angle of 30'35'07 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 54.98 feet; thence N.55'42'20 "E., a distance of 160.49 feet; thence S.01'43'53 "E., a distance of 738.04 feet; thence S.01'41'44 "E., a distance of 2,676.29 feet; thence S.01'42'40 "E., a distance of 1,334.41 feet; thence S.89'04'26 "W., a distance of 1,306.80 feet; thence S.01'30'39 "E., a distance of 2,667.44 feet; thence S.89'08'23 "W., a distance of 164.50 feet; thence S.01'29'06 "E., a distance of 1,333.63 feet; thence S.89'10'34 "W., a distance of 1,155.54 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Log Mw Containing 829.74 acres, more or less; subject to easements and restrictions of record. AGNOLI, BARB Professional E BY * NOT A S U RV&EY INDAGE, INC. Planners & Land Surveyors Guy P. Adorns, P.S.M. # 4390 'wiffIGNOLI I "::1BARBER & :�:■■■L " "' ■■■■■ iiBRUNDAGE, INC. y Professional Engineers, Planners & land Surveyors Glli.,C- :74MT.nu"i Tt1N.•WpW, FL- 341N -Fh.: (941)$91- 1111- Fu:"115 -3361 Lse Caun.,: 1621 H..4.7 Ina" . F"1 My- FL 33"1 - Phi (911) 337 -SI It - I- 09411 IH 1173 P:Qy56,le of A..h. -- Not. LB 3664 ad ES 7664 1'v ": J.D. NICEWONDER f METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FOR THE FLOW WAY CDD Line, Located In Portions of SECTIONS 22 315, T 48 S, R 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FL EXHIBIT 2 am 0 • • • 0 a 0 r, cc a� P-1 M ice..._. T 46 S T 47 S T 48 S T 49 S I LU C3 t l _',1' W J W z J C" ¢ o a- 4 r ¢ a W o z a O 9 O 3 O 1- ' z IT $ Y W N 3 W N a i W y72 z W = 2 LA O t CIA i >~ CD 3 MW 7Z J - 1 W N LL 'n+ a sn i -- 4 Or a n) w Ioe _a�� >oln G S 94 1 S L4 1 I S 9b 1 I S 61. 1 T 50 S I T 51 S I T 52 S I T 53 S LU 'Yt YKS � 4 O s 7 J � F $ ~ a o v a >Y a < 3 z cc g g S ° EE 3 w O a d' W ¢_ ` M �O G q > aLL M M Ja a: a q } F = tlJ O <O 61M� u'l I �❑ Oa! Kd,!❑ i I ®t■ z F a uj M . �zjW�2 a 15 In W J a z0 W W W a ° n F N c? z a z < a �Yi " w N3 co g, a s4 s" F; W Z 3��a �a W M aboa awa W11— K c� i�O ®® s� EmLc �® m2 ❑ 8 ? 2 i� � W O I LU C3 t l _',1' W J W z J C" ¢ o a- 4 r ¢ a W o z a O 9 O 3 O 1- ' z IT $ Y W N 3 W N a i W y72 z W = 2 LA O t CIA i >~ CD 3 MW 7Z J - 1 W N LL 'n+ a sn i -- 4 Or a n) w Ioe _a�� >oln G S 94 1 S L4 1 I S 9b 1 I S 61. 1 T 50 S I T 51 S I T 52 S I T 53 S iPlr l n r w fl , 2S8 kb�Lo W i� N S 05 1 I S t5 1 I S Z5 1 I S 99 1 W d' M uj M In W J a z0 W W ° i N c? z a M m W M aboa awa W11— i� � W O w M , z z Z - I � I z 1- in W a a ' �' ¢ I N � 1 1 , , S W IIII - N z,,,. . - �N '11 1 wikrc � _. k`r' l a', I �� w � O U b� R I ' uj iPlr l n r w fl , 2S8 kb�Lo W i� N S 05 1 I S t5 1 I S Z5 1 I S 99 1 Exhibit 5 Page 2 of 3 a. Presently developed ed sites; v b. Sites where water - dependent or water - related uses have been previously established; •C. Sites where shoreline improvements are in place; d. Sites where damage to viable, naturally functioning wetlands, or other environmentally sensitive features, could be minimized. Port of the Islands is a unique development, which is located within the Urban Designated Area, but is also totally within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern. However, a portion of the development was determined "vested" by the State of Florida, thus exempting it from the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Further, there is an existing Development Agreement between Port of the Islands, Inc. and the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs dated July 2, 1985, which regulates land uses at Port of the Islands. Port of the Islands is eligible for all provisions of the Urban - Mixed Use District in which it is located to the extent that the overall residential density and commercial intensity does not exceed that permitted under zoning at time of adoption of this Plan. 1. Urban Residential Subdistrict The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. This Subdistrict comprises approximately 93,000 acres and 80% of the Urban Mixed Use District. Maximum eligible residential density shall be determined through the Density Rating System but shall not exceed 16 dwelling units per acre except in accordance with the Transfer of Development Rights Section of the Land Development Code. (IV) 2 Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the Conservation . Designated Area and the Urban Designated Area. It includes that area south of US 41 between the City of Naples and Collier- Seminole State Park, including Marco Island and comprises approximately 18,000 acres and 15% of the Urban Mixed Use District. In order to facilitate hurricane evacuation and to protect the adjacent environmentally sensitive Conservation Designated Area, residential densities shall be limited to a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre, except as allowed in the Density Rating System to exceed 4 units per acre through provision of Affordable Housing and Transfer of Development Rights, and except as provided in the Bays hore/G ateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay. Rezones are recommended to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development. The Marco Island Master Plan shall provide for density, intensity, siting criteria and specific standards for land use districts on Marco Island. 3. Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the Urban Designated Area and the Agricultural /Rural Area and comprises approximately 5,500 acres and 5% of the Urban Mixed Use District. Residential land uses may be allowed at a maximum density of 1.5 units per gross acre, subject to the following conditions: and are not subject to the Density Rating System: a. All rezones are encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development; and b. Proposed development in the area shall be fully responsible for all necessary water management improvements, including the routing of all on -site and appropriate off -site water through the project's water management system, and a fair share cost of necessary improvements to the CR 951 canallout -fall system made necessary by new development • in the area. 19 (11n = Plan Amendment CP- 2000 -1 adopted by Ordinance No. 2000 -87 on December 12, 2000 Exhibit 5 P 8of.. .' the asphalt plant: is compatible with surrounding land uses; is not located in a County, State or Federal jurisdictional wetland area and any required buffer zones; is not located within 1,000 feet of a Florida State Park; is not located within the Area of Critical State Concern as -'epicted on the Future Land Use Map; and, is not located within 1,000 feet of a natural reservation I. Commercial uses accessory to other permitted uses, such as restaurant accessory to golf course or retail sales of produce accessory to farming, so long as restrictions or !imitations are imposed to insure the commercial use functions as an accessory, subordinate use. Such restrictions or limitations could include limiting the size and /or location of the commercial use and /or limiting access to the commercial use; m. Commercial uses, within the Rural Commercial Subdistrict, based upon criteria; n. industrial uses within the Rural - Industrial District; o. ;ravel trailer recreational vehicle parks, provided the following criteria are met: 1. The density is consistent with the Land Development Code; ?. The site has direct principal access to a road classified as an arterial in the Traffic Circulation Element, direct principal access defined as a driveway and /or roadway connection to the arterial road, with no access points from intervening properties; and, 3. The use will be compatible with surrounding land uses. (1) A Agricultural/Rural - Mixed Use District The :urpose of this District is to protect and encourage agricultural activities, conserve and pres -arre environmentally sensitive areas, provide for low density residential development, and othe- :ses identified under the Agricultural /Rural Designation. These areas generally lack public faci!i es and services. Urbanization is not promoted, therefore most allowable land uses are of low inte- s!ty in an effort to maintain and promote the rural character of these lands. Residential uses are _iiowed as follows, subject to the Interim Development Provisions: a. _ow density residential dwelling units, at a maximum density of one dwelling unit per five gross acres, except for legal non - conforming lots of record., b. Dormitories, duplexes and other staff housing, as may be provided in conjunction with onservation uses, at a density in accordance with the Land Development Code; C. Group housing uses at a density in accordance with that permitted in the Land Development �:cde; d. Staff housing in conjunction with safety service facilities and essential services, at a density in accordance with the Land Development Code; e. Farm labor housing in accordance with the Farm Labor Housing provision in the Land Development Code; f. recreation camps as defined in, and at the density allowed by, the Land Development Code. g. existing units approved for the Fiddler's Creek DRI may be reallocated to those parts of sections 18 and 19, Township 51 South, Range 27 East added to Fiddler's Creek DRI rgether with part of Section 29, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, at a density greater than unit per 5 gross acres provided that no new units are added to the 6,000 previously = �croved units, which results in a gross density of 1.6 units per acre for the Fiddler's Creek I; and further provided that no residential units shall be located on that part of Section 29 ^in the Fiddler's Creek DRI; and further provided that South Florida Water Management strict jurisdictional wetlands impacted by the DRI in said Sections do not exceed 10 acres. -i Commercial Subdistrict the Agricultural /Rural - Mixed Use District, commercial development, up to a maximum ---res, may be allowed providing the following standards for intensity of use are met _ct :o the Interim Development Provisions: rrcject, or that portion of a larger project, which is devoted to commercial 35 a• •• OUTPARCEL NOT CURRENTLY "ED BY OEYELOPER fY.Y AC3 OUt{�IflCCL i T CU " T" OBY of OPEA OUTPARLEL NOT CURRENTLY OWNEDBY DEVELOPER tT5 'V k U k r A t ri r it s .: '.'.'.. N t 1 -� 111 swat. { r 2k f. v' " •� -fill I '019=141KOWN. I d. d r s � m j E to 0) Go g N O Of r G CNDq r pO ' E00 COO (q 4 s COD. Iq O R SOD. fA 6 69 69 H 0 f09 d � O 0 0 C14 co U N Q C) e�} S N eO� n lC+ O r `ppnfN pp u� � n Iq O 1- N Gf O &q P: C N 0 � Q O O O — d Ci 46 6.- � V 6 ! V3. CD O N O C Qp cq Q�� N o CO C'7 O O O CO O n co U") U") O CND to C(O 11 669 a 4 � i9 vl9 6 V fR N r Ld O S CO c 10 O V OO O l00 O ON r p i49 iA 6 N W fNA Y �WW . F- Z O N Z w LLI a w z C7 C7 > ad O W Z d Z z u LLN ' co W F U W .9 Q W Z V O J H O 5 N Z ti H Q Z w g? 3 g a c o F T N l+1 qr O t0 ti CD O W N N N M fffVVV I I i i J 0 86 ''� 0) r r- ti c` ci ro CD r- u m N rn c N — M! 1R 69 d K 64 � O 0 0 C14 co U N Q C) e�} S N eO� n lC+ O r `ppnfN pp u� � n Iq O 1- N Gf O &q P: C N 0 � Q O O O — d Ci 46 6.- � V 6 ! V3. CD O N O C Qp cq Q�� N o CO C'7 O O O CO O n co U") U") O CND to C(O 11 669 a 4 � i9 vl9 6 V fR N r Ld O S CO c 10 O V OO O l00 O ON r p i49 iA 6 N W fNA Y �WW . F- Z O N Z w LLI a w z C7 C7 > ad O W Z d Z z u LLN ' co W F U W .9 Q W Z V O J H O 5 N Z ti H Q Z w g? 3 g a c o F T N l+1 qr O t0 ti CD O W N N N M fffVVV I I i i J 0 86 ''� '• s a h� EXHIBIT 8 4 i0m zaoo AMC SCALE X2000' -0' UPLAND PRESERVE 100.8 ACRES FLOW —WAY UPLAND MIRASOL WETLAND PRESERVE 746.2 ACRES FLOW —WAY WETLAND �...0 • Ad" am COCONATCN!! CANAL boom • Am+ommi. A.ry ..x AWE &a .W IL 3= AL A.M /NNOKAL!! ROAD MIL#44 >,lM 60- . AAl b.II..F-� MUM & FLOY FAY FLOW —WAY CONVEYANCE 36.5 ACRES WITHIN MIRASOL 25.6 ACRES WITHIN TERAFINA 6 _ 29.3 ACRES WITHIN OLDE CYPRESS m �n �...0 • Ad" am COCONATCN!! CANAL boom • Am+ommi. A.ry ..x AWE &a .W IL 3= AL A.M /NNOKAL!! ROAD MIL#44 >,lM 60- . AAl b.II..F-� MUM & FLOY FAY EXHIBIT 8A 8B Prepared by and return to: Kenneth W. Dodge LEWIS, LONGMAN & WALKER, P.A. 1700 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. #1000 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 DRAINAGE, INGRESS/EGRESS AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT THIS EASEMENT, granted this day of , 2001, by and between Robert Vocisano, as Co- Trustee under Land Trust Agreement dated May 24, 1995, and OLDE CYPRESS DEVELOPMENT, LTD., hereinafter collectively called "Grantors" and J.D. Nicewonder, hereinafter called "Grantee" and his successors and assigns. WHEREAS, Grantors Vocisano is Co- Trustee of certain property known as TERAFINA, a portion of which is described in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated herein, with full powers to protect, conserve, sell, encumber or otherwise dispose of same; and to which certain property was issued District ERP Permit #_ WHEREAS, Grantor Olde Cypress is the owner of certain property known as OLDE CYPRESS, a portion of which is described in Exhibit `B" attached and incorporated herein, with full powers to protect, conserve, sell, encumber or otherwise dispose of same; and to which certain property was issued Permit # WHEREAS, Grantee Nicewonder is the owner of certain property known as 1vIIRASOL which desires to construct a flow way for the drainage of surface water to the Cocohatchee Canal: and to which certain property was issued District ERP Permit # WITNESSETH That for and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantors hereby grant to Grantee and its successors and assigns, a Drainage Ingress and Egress and Maintenance Easement ( "Easement ") over their respective properties described in the attached Exhibits A & B for the purpose of the drainage of surface waters, together with an easement for ingress and egress to enter upon the above described lands and to construct, operate and maintain these lands in accordance with this Drainage, Ingress/Egress and Maintenance Easement and Permit # and Permit # and Permit # in perpetuity. This Easement granted herein is subject to the following terms and limitations: 1. In the event an entity is created to operate and maintain the above referenced lands in Exhibits A and B in accordance with this Easement, and Permit # and Permit # and Permit # , Grantee shall assign this Easement_ to said entity together with all rights of access, maintenance and construction R9 oil contained herein. Failure to do so may result in violation of the above referenced ERP permits. 2. Should Grantee be required to access lands immediately adjacent to the Easement area in the course of constructing, operating or maintaining said Easement, Grantors shall not unreasonably withhold the granting of temporary construction Easements to accomplish same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantors have executed this instrument or caused the same to be executed by their representatives, there unto duly authorized on the day and year first above written. OLDE CYPRESS DEVELOPMENT, LTD. Witnesses: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, duly authorized to take oaths, appeared _, who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and has signed the foregoing instrument. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME this day of , 2001. My commission expires: NOTARY PUBLIC/ STATE OF FLORIDA 2 Witnesses: ROBERT VOCISANO Co- Trustee under Land Trust Agreement dated May 24, 1995 of TeraFina Development STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, duly authorized to take oaths, appeared who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and has signed the foregoing instrument. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME this day of , 2001. My commission expires: VCHent Docurtxnts \Mimso1142471Misc\Easemcut.dce NOTARY PUBLIC/ STATE OF FLORIDA 3 1.0 1.1 Exhibit 9 STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS Introduction Purpose and Scope Page 1 of 5 This Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs ( "SERC ") supports the petition to form the Flow Way Community Development District ( "District"). The proposed District comprises approximately 950 acres of land located in Collier County, Florida. The limitations on the scope of.this SERC are explicitly set out in Section 190.002(2)(d), F.S. (governing District formation or alteration) as follows: 'That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to uniform general law shall be fair and based one on factors material to managing and financing the service delivery function of the district, so that any matter concerning_ erp matting or planning of the development is not material or relevant (emphasis added.)" 1.2 Overview of the Flow Way Community Development District The District is designed to provide community infrastructure, services, and facilities along with their operations and maintenance, to the proposed Mirasol development. Flow Way Community Development District will be an upscale, fully amenitized, residential golf course community. The proposed development plan for the lands within the District include the construction of up to 799 single family residential dwelling units, recreational areas, 36 holes of golf, a golf clubhouse, a swim and fitness facility, a tennis facility, and a network of trails and parks, is authorized for portions of the development to be included within the District. 1.3 Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs Section 120.541(2), F.S. (1997), defines the elements a statement of estimated regulatory costs must contain: "(a) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the rule, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the rule. (b) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to any other state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues. (c) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities, including local governmental entities, required to comply with the requirements of the rule. As used in this paragraph, "transactional costs" are direct costs that are readily ascertainable based upon standard business practices, and include filing fees, the cost of obtaining a license, the cost of equipment required to be installed or used or procedures required to be employed in complying with the rule, additional operating costs incurred, and the cost of monitoring and reporting. Exhibit 9 Page 2 of S (d) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Section 288.703, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52 F.S. Hier County is not defined as a small county for purposes.of this requirement. 8 (e) Any additional information that the agency determines may be useful. (f) In the statement or revised statement, whichever applies, a description of any good faith written proposal submitted under paragraph (1) (a) and either a statement adopting the alternative or a statement of the reasons for rejecting the alternative in favor of the proposed rule. 2.0 A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and entities likely to be required to comply with the ordinance, together with a general description of the types of individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance. As noted above, Flow Way Community Development District is a residential community designed for up to 799 total residential units. Formation of the proposed District would put all of these households under the jurisdiction of the proposed District. 3.0 Good Faith estimate of the cost to state and local government entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and any anticipated effect on state and local revenues. 3.1 Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance State Governmental Entities There will be only modest costs to various State governmental entities to implement and enforce the proposed formation of the District. The District has fewer than 1,000 acres, so Collier County is the establishing entity under 190.005 (2). F.S. The modest costs to various State entities to implement and enforce the proposed ordinance relate strictly to the receipt and processing of various reports that the proposed District is required to file with the State and its various entities. Appendix A lists the reporting requirements. The costs to those State agencies that will receive and process the District's reports are very small, because the District is only one of many governmental units that are required to submit the various reports. Therefore, the marginal cost of processing one additional set of report is inconsequential. Additionally, pursuant to section 189.412, F.S., the proposed district must pay an annual fee to the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs, which offsets suct costs. Collier County Since the proposed District in Collier County and consists of less than 1,000 acres, Collier Count and its staff will process, analyze and vote upon the petition to establish the District. These activities will absorb some resources. Furthermore, even these costs to the County are modest for a number of reasons. First, review of th, petition to establish the District does not include analysis of the project itself. Second, the petitioi itself provides much of the information needed for a staff review. Third, local governments routine! Exhibit 9 Page 3 of 5 process similar petitions for land uses and zoning changes that are far more complex than is the petition to establish a community development district. 8B 3.2 Impact on State and Local Revenues Adoption of the proposed ordinance will have no negative impact on State or local revenues. The District is an independent unit of local government. It is designed to provide community facilities and services to serve the Mirasol development project. It has its own sources of revenue. No State or local subsidies are required or expected. In this regard it is important to note than any debt obligations incurred by the District to construct its infrastructure, or for any .other reason, are not debts of the State of Florida or any unit of local government. In accordance with State law, debts of the District are strictly its own responsibility. 4.0 A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individuals and entities required to comply with the requirements . of the ordinance. Table 1 provides. an outline of the various facilities and services the proposed District may provide. The drainage facilities will ail be funded, operated and owned by the District. The District will also fund the construction of the water and sewer distribution system. However, the County will own and operate the water and sewer system serving the District. Table 1. Flow Way Community Development District Proposed Facilities and Services FACILITY FUNDED BY O & M BY OWNERSHIP Drainage CDD CDD CDD Water /Sewer CDD County County Roadways /Street Lighting CDD CDD CDD Recreation CDD CDD CDD Mitigation CDD CDD CDD Landscaping CDD CDD CDD The petitioner has estimated the design and development costs for providing the capital facilities outlined in Table 2. The cost estimates are shown in Table 2 below. Total design and development costs for these facilities are estimated to be approximately $55,694,575. The District may issue special assessment or other revenue bonds to fund the development of these facilities. These bonds would be repaid through non ad valorem assessments levied on all properties in the District that may benefit from the District's capital improvement program as outlined in Table 2. Prospective future landowners in the District may be required to pay non -ad valorem assessments levied by the District to secure the debt incurred through bond issuance. In additional to the levy of non ad valorem assessments for debt service, the District may also impose a _ non ad valorem assessment to fund the operations maintenance of the District and its facilities and services. Furthermore, locating in the District by new residents is completely voluntary. So, ultimately, all owners and users of the affected property choose to accept the non -ad valorem assessments as tradeoff for the numerous benefits and facilities that the District provides. Exhibit 9 Page 4 of 5 8B I I - M A Community Development District ("CDD") provides residents with the option of having higher levels of facilities and services financed through self - imposed charges. The District is an alternative means to finance necessary community services. District financing is no more expensive, and often less expensive, than the alternatives of a municipal service taxing unit (MSTU), a neighborhood association, County provision, or-through developer equity and /or bank loans. In considering these costs it shall be noted that occupants of the lands to be included within the District will receive three major classes of benefits. First, those residents and businesses in the District will receive a higher level of public services and amenities sooner than would otherwise be the case. Second, a CDD is a mechanism for assuring that the community services and amenities will be completed concurrently with development of lands within the District. This satisfies the revised growth management legislation, and it assures that growth pays for itself without undue burden on other consumers. Establishment of the District will ensure that these landowners pay for the provision of facilities, services and improvements to these lands. Third, A CDD is the sole form of governance which allows District landowners, through landowner voting and ultimately electoral voting for resident elected boards, to determine the type, quality and expense of District services they receive, provided they meet the County's overall requirements. The cost impact on the ultimate landowners in the District is not the total cost for the District to provide infrastructure services and facilities. Instead, it is the incremental costs above what the landowners would have paid to install infrastructure via an alternative financing mechanism. Given the low cost of capital for a CDD, the cost impact to landowners is negligible. This incremental cost of the high quality infrastructure provided by the District is likely to be fairly low.. Table 2. Cost Estimate for District Facilities CATEGORY COST Roadways Land Clearing $ 11547,825 Utilities $ 10,887,143 Infrastructure $ 7,524,168 Mitigation & Acquisition $ 71000,000 Water Management System $ 13,427,892 Landscape $ 5,663,890 Engineering $ 5,568,689 Permitting $ 844,441 Contingency $ 3,105,409 TOTAL $ 55,694,575 Table 3. Probable Cost Estimate and Estimated Timetable. Attached is Table 3, which is an estimate of probable costs and timetable of improvements. Exhibit 9 Pa ge 5 of 5 5.0 An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined by Secti n 2 3, F.S., and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Section 120.52, F.S. There will be no impact on small business because of the formation of the propoted District. If anything, the impact may be positive. This is because the District must competitively bid all of its contracts. This affords small businesses the opportunity to bid on District work. Collier County has an estimated population (not incarcerated) in 1998 that is greater than 75,000. Therefore the County is not defined as a "small" county according to Section 120.52, F.S. 6.0 Any additional useful information. The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of economic theory, especially, as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory costs and benefits. Inputs were received from the Developer's Engineer and other professionals associated with the Developer. Prepared by: EXHIBIT lo 88 A'j 1, Robert G. Claussen, Managing Member of Mirasol Development L.L.C., hereby authorizes the following individuals as authorized agents in matters involving Mirasol Development L.L.C., and/or Flow Way Community Development District, and /or IMCOLLIER Joint Venture, with any Governmental Agency, including but not limited to Collier County Board of County Commissioners. Dr. Henry Fishkind Fishkind & Associates, Inc. 11869 High Tech Avenue Orlando, FL 32817 and Ms. Neale Montgomery, Esq. Pavese, Haver6eld, Dalton, Harrison, Jensen, LLP. 1833 Hendry Street:, Ft. Myers, FL 33902 Executed this day, September 1, 2001 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER IMCOLLIER JOINT VENTURE, A Florida General Partnership, By: Mirasol Development, LLC A Florida Limited Liability Company, Managing Venturer BY: Robert G. Claussen, Managing Member The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1 day of September, 2001, by Robert G. Claussen, Managing Member Mirasol Development LLC, on behalf of IMCOLLIER Joint Venture and/or Mirasol Development LLC. He is per §pnall krpy rto me. �tAL NO��a o5 P jaelf JOHN mom z * CCT30s9� 0 F�o AP eo FX02 " 86 "�I January 10, 2002 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, FL 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider the Proposed Mirasol Development, L.L.C. Community Development District Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced notice and map on Tuesday, January 15, 2002, Tuesday, January 22, 2002, Tuesday, January 29, 2002, Tuesday, February 5, 2002. This advertisement should be no less than one - quarter page and the headline in the advertisement should be in a type no smaller than 18 point. The advertisement should not be placed in that portion of the newspaper where legal notices and classified advertisements appear. Kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. - Sinc rely, G�� %� �G G✓ oanne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk Enclosures Account 111- 138317- 341490 • r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (the "Board ") hereby gives notice to the citizens of Collier County that a public hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of Section 190.005, Florida Statutes, at 9:00 a.m., in the Commission Board Room, 3`d Floor Building "F", Collier County Government Center, 3301 Tamiami Trail, East, Naples, Florida, on Tuesday, February 12, 2002. The subject of the Public Hearing is the filing with the County of a petition by Mirasol Development, L.L.C., for the establishment by Collier County Ordinance pursuant to Section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes, of a Community Development District form of local government. The district government would serve approximately 830 acres in Collier County generally described as follows: The proposed District is located entirely within Collier County, Florida. The proposed district covers approximately 830 acres of land. The site is located in portions of Section 15 and Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, near the intersection of CR 951 and Immokalee Road. LOCATION MAP 8B r Such community development district government is a way to provide infrastructure subject to the regulatory requirements of both the State of Florida and Collier County governing any existing or future lawful use and development of the land described above, and specifically governing the planning, implementation, maintenance and financing of basic community facilities, systems and services which may be required of any such development consistent with principles of concurrency, comprehensive planning and development permitting. On November 29, 2001, Mirasol Development, L.L.C., officially submitted and filed its petition to Collier County, along with the application processing fee of $15,000.00 for review by the County. The Board will comply with Section 190.005(1)(c), Florida Statutes, in conducting this Public Hearing. The purpose of this hearing is to consider the relationship of the petition as submitted by Mirasol Development, L.L.C., to the six factors listed in Section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes, and determine whether Collier County will adopt an ordinance creating the Community Development District. According to the Petition, at least four categories of persons may be affected by the economic consequences of the proposed district establishment: State of Florida and its citizens; Collier County and its citizens; the present property owners; and the future property owners. A copy of the full text of the Petitioner's statement of estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes, including an explanation of its computations and determinations, is available for review, along with a copy of the full text of the petition and any of its documentation, at the Office of the County Clerk, Collier County, 3301 Tamiami Trail, East, Naples, Florida. Copies of the petition, which contains the legal description of the real property to be serviced by the proposed district, are also on file at the Collier County Planning Services Department, Comprehensive Planning Section at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida. All interested persons are invited to attend. ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s /JoAnne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk (seal) F 0 2 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (the "Board ") hereby gives notice to the citizens of Collier County that a public hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements and procedures of Section 190.005, Florida Statutes, at 9:00 a.m., in the Commission Board Room, P Floor Building "F ", Collier County Government Center, 3301 Tamiami Trail, East, Naples, Florida, on Tuesday, February 12, 2002. The subject of the Public Hearing is the filing with the County of a petition by Mirasol Development, L.L.C., for the establishment by Collier County Ordinance pursuant to Section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes, of a Community Development District form of local government. The district government would serve approximately 830 acres in Collier County generally described as follows: The proposed District is located entirely within Collier County, Florida. The proposed district covers approximately 830 acres of land. The site is located in portions of Section 15 and Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, near the intersection of CR 951 and Immokalee Road. LOCATION MAP 88 Such community development district government is a way to provide infrastructure subject to the regulatory requirements of both the State of Florida and Collier County governing any existing or future lawful use and development of the land described above, and specifically governing the planning, implementation, maintenance and financing of basic community facilities, systems and services which may be required of any such development consistent with principles of concurrency, comprehensive planning and development permitting. On November 29, 2001, Mimsol Development, L.L.C., officially submitted and filed its petition to Collier County, along with the application processing fee of $15,000.00 for review by the County. The Board will comply with Section 190.005(1)(c), Florida Statutes, in conducting this Public Hearing. The purpose of this hearing is to consider the relationship of the petition as submitted by Mirasol Development, L.L.C., to the six factors listed in Section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes, and determine whether Collier County will adopt an ordinance creating the Community Development District. According to the Petition, at least four categories of persons may be affected by the economic consequences of the proposed district establishment: State of Florida and its citizens; Collier County and its citizens; the present property owners; and the future property owners. A copy of the full text of the Petitioner's statement of estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes, including an explanation of its computations and determinations, is available for review, along with a copy of the full text of the petition and any of its documentation, at the Office of the County Clerk, Collier County, 3301 Tamiami Trail, East, Naples, Florida. Copies of the petition, which contains the legal description of the real property to be serviced by the proposed district, are also on file at the Collier County Planning Services Department, Comprehensive Planning Section at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida. All interested persons are invited to attend. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator arior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s /JoAnne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk (seal) oQggE Cl U y Dwight E. Brock Clerk January 10, 2002 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES,. FLORIDA 34101 -3044 f 88 CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Mirasol PUD %Charles Mann Pavese, Haverfield, Dalton, Harrison & Jensen, L.L.P. Post Office Drawer 1507 Fort Myers, Florida 33902 -1507 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider the Proposed Mirasol Development,L.L.C. Community Development District Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 12, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Tuesday, January 15, 2002, Tuesday, January 22, 2002, Tuesday, January 29, 2002, and again on Tuesday, February 5, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK anne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk Enclosure o�.�HE C1RCG'T U �`y couhni Dwight E. Brock Clerk January 10, 2002 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COWER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 Mr. Robert G. Claussen 6025 Carlton Lakes Blvd. Naples, Florida 34110 CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider the Proposed Mirasol Development,L.L.C. Community Development District Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 12, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Tuesday, January 15, 2002, Tuesday, January 22, 2002, Tuesday, January 29, 2002, and again on Tuesday, February 5, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK joan6ne: R. Allen Deputy Clerk Enclosure OQ E ClRCG� V `•Ail Dwight E. Brock Clerk January 10, 2002 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101 -3044 Dr. Henry Fishkind Fishkind & Associates, Inc. 11869 High Tech Avenue Orlando, Florida 32817 89 CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider the Proposed Mirasol Development,L.L.C. Community Development District Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 12, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Tuesday, January 15, 2002, Tuesday, January 22, 2002, Tuesday, January 29, 2002, and again on Tuesday, February 5, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK oanne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk Enclosure o4,�gE CI1p�.G� v �`y �cburrt�t tS'" Dwight E. Brock Clerk January 10, 2002 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLDER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES,. FLORIDA 34101 -3044 Ms. Neale Montgomery, Esq, Pavese, Haverfield, Dalton, P.O. Drawer 1507 " 88 " CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Harrison, & Jensen, L.L.P. Ft. Myers, Florida 33902 -1507 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider the Proposed Mirasol Development,L.L.C. Community Development District Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 12, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Tuesday, January 15, 2002, Tuesday, January 22, 2002, Tuesday, January 29, 2002, and again on Tuesday, February 5, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK oanne R Enclosure R dlz"� , Allen, Deputy Clerk 8B FAX TO:J LOCATION: FAX NO: COMMENTS: FROM: LOCATION: COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE /MINUTES & RECORDS FAX NO: (941) 774 -8408 PHONE NO: (941) 774 -8406 DATE SENT: TIME SENT: DY?` -31 AM # OF PAGES: z (INCLUDING COVER SHEET) msword /Q /Fax Form 10130 /01;tm /o. -2 ,:ao Z- PM Flo r m NAPLES DAILY NEWS Published Daily Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that they serve as the Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida; that the attached copy of the advertising, being a PUBLIC NOTICE in the matter of PUBLIC NOTICE was published in said newspaper 4 time(s) in the issue on January 15, 22, 29, February 5, 2002 Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and afiiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Signature of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me This day of February, 2002 My Cort ni"on DD056M Expim September 11. 2005 Ar an • 7 L . PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE PUBLIC NOTICE a° ''iNOTIC ROF : PURLIC ��IEAARINC ; .r. yy f , ' The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (the 'Board") hereby gives notice to the citizens of Collier County that a public hearing shall be conducted in accordance with the % -; requirements and pr edures of Section 190.005, Florida Statutes, at 9:00 a.m., In the Commission Board Room, 3rd Floor Building "F", Collier County Government Center, 3301 Tamiaml Trail, East, .;; Naples, Florlda;'dn Tuesday, February 12, 2002. The subject of the Public Hearing Is the filing with', f,. the County of a petition by Miresol Development, L.L.C., for the establishment by Collier County Ordinance pursuant to Section 190.005(2), Florida Statutes, of a Community Development District form of local government. The district government would serve_ approximately 830 acres In Collier County generally described as follows: The proposed District Is located entirely within Collier County, Florida. The proposed district covers approximately 830 acres of land. The site Is located In portions of Section 15 and . r Section 22, Township .,48 South, Range 26 East, , near the Intersection of CR 951 and Road. Immokales Roa : L XATM MAC UZ courmr i `; . I , I , , caumt txltlDlTY I 1 * 7"7- rIll■ w" iu■■l..■ "1�" �]4 111 t _ ■C` �(l� lad li.i i }� ®).�.1<� SM .�N� ■ l all r . I:I.. ...Illlllll,. 111111 , �.. 1 .��II� I .IL == iiiiiiuilnuuuu. .``■ ��!!��C ■ IIIIIIIIILp11111 � ^�1 , {. ' - .�a.atl6; Ir�2 �IIII]Illlle �111,16�Iy�, ©� � rani .111_1 C -I'll „__.. ..., ,.. ■ ' 1 6�-= llllllllIN: fill- �I �■ �,L -.. _111111111111 ---. —UM r -� ��= 1111FIIIIIpi �■13•� 1 Such community development district government is a w to provide Infrastructure alub)ect to the regulatory requirements of both the State of Florida and Collier County governing any existing or future lawful use and development of the land described above, and specifically governing the planning, Implementation, maintenance and financing of basic community facilities, systems and services which may be required of any such developmenCoonslotent with, principles of concurrency, comprehensive planning and development permitting. On November 29, 2001, Mirasol Development, L.L.C., officially submitted and filed Its petition to Collier County, along with the application processing fee of $15,000.00 for review by the County. The Board will comply with Section 190.005(1)(c), Florida Statutes, In conducting this Public Hearing. The purpose of this hearing is to consider the relationship of the petition as submitted by Mirasol, Development, L.L.C., to the,six factors listed in Section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes, and determine whether Collier County will adopt an ordinance creating the Community Development District. According to the Petition, at least four categories of persons may be affected by the economic consequences of the proposed district establishment: State of Florida and Its citizens; Collier County and its citizens; the present property owners; and the future property owners. A copy of the full text of the Petitioner's statement of estimated regulatory costs in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541, Florida Statutes, Including an explanation of Its computations and determinations, is available for review, along with a copy of the full text of the petition and any Of its documentation, at the Office of the County .Clerk, Collier County, 3301 Tsmlami Trail, East, Naples, Florida. Copies of the petition, which contains the legal description of the real property to be serviced by the proposed district, are also on file at the Collier County Planning Services Department, Comprehensive Planning Section at 2500 North Horseshoe, Drive, Naples, Florida. All Interested persons are invited to attend.; OT All persons wishing to speak on any a ends Item must register wkh the County administrator a or o presentation of the agenda item to �e addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any Item. The selectloft of an Individual to speak on behaB of an organization or group is ancouragged. ff recognized by the Chairman a spokesperson fora group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an Item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included In the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN ''' DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /a/JoAnne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk r ►. ORDINANCE NO. 02- 09 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING THE FLOW WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; ADOPTING FINDINGS OF FACT; PROVIDING FOR AUTHORITY; DESCRIBING THE EXTERNAL BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT; NAMING THE INITIAL MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS; NAMING THE DISTRICT; RECOGNIZING GOVERNING LAWS; CONSENTING TO THE EXERCISE OF CERTAIN SPECIAL POWERS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE CODE OF LAWAS AND ORDINANCES; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. RECITALS WHEREAS, Mirasol Development, L.L.C. has petitioned the Board of County Commissioners (Board) of Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, to establish the FLOW WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT (District); and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, after proper published notice conducted a public hearing on the petition and determined the following with respect to the factors to be considered in Section 190.005(1)(e), as required by Section 190.005(2)(c), Florida Statutes. 1. The petition is complete in that it meets the requirements of Section 190.005 (1) (a), Florida Statutes; and all statements contained within the petition are true and correct. 2. Establishment of the proposed District is not inconsistent with any applicable element or portion of the local comprehensive plan of Collier County, known as the Collier County Growth Management Plan, or the State Comprehensive Plan. 3. The area of land within the proposed District is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community. 4. The District is the best alternative available for delivering community development services and facilities to the area that will be serviced by the District. 5. The community development services and facilities of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and uses of existing local and regional community development services and facilities. 6. The area that will be served by the District is amenable to separate special- district government; and WHEREAS, it is the policy of the State, as provided in Section 190.002 (2) (c), Florida Statutes, that the exercise by any independent district of its powers as set forth by uniform general law comply with all applicable governmental laws, rules, regulations, and policies governing planning and permitting of the development to be served by the district, to ensure that neither the establishment nor operation of such district is a development order under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, and that the district so established does not have any zoning or permitting powers governing development; and WHEREAS, Section 190.004 (3), Florida Statutes, provides that all governmental planning, environmental, and land development laws, regulations, and ordinances apply to all development of the land within a community development district; and that a district shall take no action which is inconsistent with applicable comprehensive plans, ordinances, or regulations of local general purpose government; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 190.012, Florida Statutes, the District's special powers are subject to the regulatory jurisdiction and permitting authority of all applicable governmental bodies, agencies and special districts having authority with respect to any area included therein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: FINDINGS OF FACT. The foregoing Recitals are hereby adopted as if fully set forth here as findings of facts which are determined by the Board to be true and correct. SECTION TWO: AUTHORITY FOR ORDINANCE. This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to Section 190.005 (2), Florida Statutes, and other applicable provisions of law governing county ordinances. SECTION THREE: ESTABLISHMENT OF THE FLOW WAY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT. The Flow Way Community Development District is hereby established within the boundaries of the real property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. SECTION FOUR: DESIGNATION OF INITIAL BOARD MEMBERS. The following five persons are herewith designated to be the initial members of the Board of Supervisors: 1. Christopher G. Claussen 2074 Sevilla Way Naples, FL 34109 2. Jack Sterling 3221 64th Street, SW Naples, FL 34105 5. Thomas Barrett 132 -204 Pebble Shores Drive Naples, FL 34110 SECTION FIVE: DISTRICT NAME. 3. Bruce Bowers 1205 Pocantico Lane Naples, FL 34110 4. Mark Alderuccio 5425 Park Central Court Naples, FL 34109 The community development district herein established shall henceforth be known as the "Flow Way Community Development District." SECTION SIX: STATUTORY PROVISIONS GOVERNING DISTRICT. The Flow Way Community Development District shall be governed by the provisions of Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, and all other applicable general and local law. SECTION SEVEN: CONSENT TO SPECIAL POWERS. The Board specifically consents to the District's exercise of certain additional special powers to plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate, and maintain additional systems and facilities for: (i) parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses; and (ii) security, OA �a 10 1 including, but not limited to, guardhouses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion - detection systems, and patrol cars, when authorized by proper governmental agencies; except that the District may not exercise any police power, but may contract with the appropriate local general - purpose government agencies for an increased level of such services within the District boundaries; all as authorized and described by Section 190.012 (2)(a) and (d), Florida Statutes. The Board further recognizes the District's right to seek consent from Collier County for further additional special powers in accordance with Section 190.012(2), Florida Statutes. SECTION EIGHT: CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY. In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any phrase or portion of this Ordinance is held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION NINE: INCLUSION IN CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES. The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinances may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section ", "article ", or any other appropriate word. SECTION TEN: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance becomes effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this ,?G day of ..y�"&&::e - � , 2002. r ANTES D fKV16HT E. BROCK, Deputy Clerk Att"t " M chalran's sigatwt only. Approved as to Form And Legal Sufficiency: PATRICK (_-� °VI RITE, Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA _ZY: ��e JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN � r • r BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RE: PROPOSED ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO ) SECTION 190.005 (2), FLORIDA STATUTES ) TO ESTABLISH THE FLOW WAY ) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ) PETITION TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT DISTRICT MIRASOL DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., (hereinafter "Petitioner "), by and through its undersigned attorney, hereby petitions the Collier County Board of County Commissioners to adopt an ordinance: establish and recognizing a Community Development District (hereinafter "District ") pursuant to the Uniform Community Development District Act of 1980, Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, as amended; acknowledging the uniform district charter contained in Sections 190.006 through 190.041 as provided by Section 190.004(4), Florida Statutes, establishing the District on the property described herein within which the District may manage and finance its basic infrastructure systems, facilities and services as provided in its charter; and designating the initial District Board of Supervisors. In support of this petition, Petitioner states: 1. Location and Size. The proposed District is located entirely within Collier County, Florida. Exhibit 1 depicts the general location of the project. The proposed district covers approximately 830 acres of land. The site is located in portions of Section 15 and Section 22, near the intersection of CR 951 and Immokalee Road. The metes and bounds description of the external boundaries of the District is set forth in Exhibit 2. Deleted: C:\DOCUME- 1\kdodge\LOC A1.S- 1 \Temp\PFr1T10N.DOC ..... , Deleted: 1 _...... .... _ ......... _ ........... _ ............. . ..... _.._ ..... . 'Page ! of � r • r 2. Excluded Parcels. There are no parcels within the external boundaries of the proposed District, which are to be excluded from the District. 3. Landowner Consent. At the time of filing this Petition, all of the land to be included in the District is owned by IMCOLLIER Joint Venture. Petitioner has obtained written consent to establish the District in accordance with Section 190.005, F.S. Documentation of this consent is contained in Exhibit 3. 4. Initial Board Members. The five persons designated to serve as the initial members of the Board of Supervisors of the proposed District is as follows: Christopher G. Claussen 2074 Sevilla Way Naples. FL 34109 Jack Sterling 3221 64`' St. SW Naples, FL 34105 Bruce Bowers 1205 Pocantico Lane Naples FL 34110 Mark Alderuccio 5425 Park Central Court Naples, FL 34109 Thomas Barrett 132 -204 Pebble Shores Drive Naples, FL 34110 All of the above - listed persons are residents of the State of Florida, and citizens of the United States of America. 5. Name. The proposed name of the District is the "Flow Way Community Development District." Deleted: C. \DOCUME- 1\kdodge\LOC AILS- 1 \Temp\PEPITION.DOC ..... Deleted: l Page 2 of,4- 8B ' 1 6. Existing Zoning_ Currently, the lands to be included within the District are zoned PUD. Neighboring lands are principally zoned PUD and AG, as shown in Exhibit 4. 7. Future Land Uses. The future general distribution, location, and extent of the public and private land uses proposed for the District by future land use plan element of the County's Future Land Use Plan is identified on Exhibit 5. The construction of approximately up to 799 residential dwelling units, recreational areas, 36 holes of golf, clubhouse, a swimming and fitness facility, a tennis facility, and a network of trails and parks are authorized for the portions of the development to be included within the District. Development is projected to occur over an estimated 8 -year period. The proposed land uses for the lands contained within the proposed District are consistent with the approved Collier County Future Land Use Plan. 8. Major Water and Wastewater Facilities. Exhibit 6 shows the major trunk water mains and wastewater interceptors within the currently undeveloped lands proposed to be included within the District. A portion of the storm water run -off will be reclaimed for golf course irrigation. It is currently proposed that Collier County will provide water and sewer service to the lands within the District. 9. District Facilities and Services. Exhibit 7, attached hereto, depicts the type of facilities the Petitioner presently expects the District to finance, construct and install from approximately 2001 -2008. The estimated costs of construction are also described in Exhibit 7. Actual construction timetables and expenditures will likely vary, due in part to the effects of future changes in the economic conditions upon costs such as Deleted: c.\DmumE-IVcdodge\Loc labor services materials interest rates, and market conditions. ALS- 1 \Temp\PETIT1ON.DOC - ... . ' Deleted: i ........... _. ..... ._...- ...... _...... ........ ,Page 3 ofZ. 8B Deleted: for 10. Mitigation lands for the project in Sections 10 and 15 and to the east 4f , Section 10. The District shall have the authority, pursuant to Section 190.012 (1)(f), Florida Statutes, to exercise all powers under the Act with regard to the mitigation lands depicted s the "U land Preserve" and "Wetland Preserve" areas on attached Exhibit 8. , These mitigation lands are in addition to the mitigation lands located within the boundaries of the District and perpetual maintenance and monitoring is required by the DeleteiJ: the following South Florida Water Management District as a condition of ,Environmental Resource ; Permit! (Application N9, 000518 -19, These areas are necessary construct the public,;. - -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- and private land uses identified in Exhibit 5,.. The District shall comply with all the conditions in the ven-nit issued pursuant to Applicatio!} 000518 -19, reQardin& the e � perpetual maintenance and monitoring of the mitigation areas as depicted in Exhibit 8 11. Chain (or ribbon) of lakes. The District shall have the authority, pursuant to Section 190.012 (1)(a), Florida Statutes, to exercise all powers under the Act on the water management improvements depicted • s the "Flow -Way-Cone vance" on attached_ Exhibit 8. These water conveyance improvements provide the necessary legal positive outfall to drain the land uses within the District. These conveyances are also a condition for the issuance of the South Florida Water Management District to obtain the Environmental Resource Permits (Applications No. 000518 -10, 010419 -6 and 970923 - 112 ) required for the lands within the District. As part of the reasonable assurances granted to the South Florida Water Management District for the referenced Environmental Resource Permit applications. the District shall comely with all the Deleted: s Deleted: s Deleted: ,010419 -6 and 970923 -12) Deleted: are required by the South Florida Water Management District to obtain the Environmental Resource Permit (Application No. 000518 -10) Deleted: The District will take all required action, including the maintenance of habitat and/or plant and animal species as required by this permit to offset any unavoidable environmental impacts resulting from development of the land uses in the District. Deleted: s Deleted: , 010419 -6 and 970923 -12 Deleted: in - I necessary and required permit conditions in the permits associated with the referenced Meted: chain of Lakes/Flow Way Deleted: c:\DOCUME-f\kdodge\1.00 applications, requiring perpetual maintenance and operation of the t Flow_V6'ay ,' ALS- 1 \Temp\PET1770N.DOC.... . Deleted: t ,Pagg 4 of'S - - - _ . ............. .... .... _ .. . Conveyance area as depicted in Exhibit 8, Jo insure that the District has the authority -to- exercise its powers on all of the water management improvements located outside the geographical boundaries of the District, it has been granted a Drainage Ingress /Egress and Maintenance Easement from the adjacent landowners (Olde Cypress Development, Ltd., and Robert Vocisano, Trustee) over which a portion of these water mana ement improvements are located which is attached as .Exhibit 8A. These entities are not located within nor a part of the District, however, in order for Petitioner and these adjacent landowners to obtain their Environmental Resource Permits, the District was required to accept responsibility over the, maintenance responsibilities for the Flow -Way Convevance . set forth in Exhibit 8. 12. Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs. Exhibit 9 is the statement of estimated regulatory costs ( "SERC ") prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541. Florida Statutes (1997). The SERC is based upon presently available data. The data and methodology used in preparing the SERC, accompany it. 13. Authorized Agent. The Petitioner, Mirasol Development, L.L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Company, is authorized to do business in Florida. The authorized agent for the Petitioner is: Robert G. Claussen 6025 Carlton Lakes Blvd. Naples, FL 34110 See Exhibit 10 — Authorization of Agent. Copies of all correspondence and official notices should also be sent to: 8g , Deleted: Inserted: _. To insure that the District has the authority to exercise its powers on all of the water management improvements located outside the geographical boundaries of the District, it has been granted a Drainage Ingress/Egress and Maintenance Easement from the adjacent landowners (Olde Cypress Development, Ltd., and Robert Vocisano, Trustee) over which a portion of these water management improvements are located Deleted: mitigation and Dr. Henry Fishkind Fishkind & Associates, Inc. 11869 High Tech Avenue Orlando, FL 32817 Deleted: C -.\DOCUME- I\kdodge\LOC ALS- 1 \Temp\PE ITIONMOC.... . And: Deletetl: l i a eSof 8B - Ms. Neale Montgomery, Esq. Pavese, Haverfield, Dalton, Harrison, & Jensen, L.L.P. P.O. Drawer 1507 Ft. Myers, FL 33902 -1507 14. This petition to establish the Flow Way Community Development District should be granted for the following reasons: A. Establishment of the District and all land used and services planned within the proposed District are not inconsistent with applicable elements or portions of the effective State Comprehensive Plan or the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. B. The area of land within the proposed District is part of a planned community. It is of a sufficient size and is sufficiently compact and contiguous to be developed as one functional and interrelated community. C. The establishment of the District will prevent the general body of taxpayers in Collier County from bearing the burden for installation of the infrastructure and the maintenance of certain facilities with the development encompassed by the District. The District is the best alternative for delivering community development service and facilities to the proposed community without imposing an additional burden on the general population of the local general- purpose government. Establishment of the District in conjunction with a comprehensively planned community, as proposed, allows for a more efficient use of resources. D. The community development services and facilities of the District Deleted: CAD0CUME- 1\kdodge\ 0C will not be incompatible with the capacity and use of existing local and regional A1S- 1 \Temp\PEr1T10N.D0C ..... Deleted: l gage 6 ofd 8g , community development services and facilities. In addition, the establishment of the District will provide a perpetual entity capable of making reasonable provisions for the operation and maintenance of the District's services and facilities. E. The area to be served by the proposed District is amenable to separate special- district government. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the County Commission of Collier County, Florida to: 1. Direct its staff to schedule a public hearing in accordance with the requirements of Section 190.005 (2) (b). Florida Statutes (1997); 2. Grant the petition and adopt an ordinance to establish the District pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes; 3. Consent to the District's exercise of certain additional powers to finance, fund, plan, establish, acquire, construct, reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate and maintain systems and facilities for (i) parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses, (ii) security, including, but not limited to, guard- houses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion - detection systems, and patrol cars, when authorized by proper governmental agencies, all as authorized and described by Section 190.012 (2), Florida Statutes. I Deleted: I J _RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED - this--------- a - of ----------------- Deleted: 1 200,2 '----------------------------------------------------- - - - - -- Deleted: C.ADOCUMF_1\kdodge\LOC By: ALS- 1 \TeffTW 1ON.DOC. - - - . Neale Montgomery Deleted: l Page 7 of'i3.- - - - - - -- Pavese, Haverfield, Dalton, Harrison & Jensen, L.L.P. 1833 Hendry Street P.O. Drawer 1507 Fort Myers, FL 33902-1507 Representatives for the Petitioner r 8B 'v Deleted: C.\DoCUME-I\kdodge\LoC ALS-I\Temp\PErrrI0N.D0C ..... Deleted: 1 ... . .............. . . .... . .... . . ...... STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct - copy of: ORDINANCE 2002 -09 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 26th day of February, 2002, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 27th day of February, 2002. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts an�i;.Cle�tk�� Ex- officio to, Board .pf `"-> County Commissioke�s - Y �� '.� .' •�,��'s is By: Ellie Hoffma'�; � ; - Deputy Clerk April 29, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMMUNTW nVxrvr Ms. Misty Pearson, Document Specialist Department of State, Collins Building Suite L 43 107 West Gaines Street Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -0250 PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 RE: Resubmitted Flow Way Community Development District Ordinance. Dear Ms. Pearson: On February 26, 2002, the Collier County Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance No. 09, establishing the "Flow Way Community Development District." This Ordinance was filed with o2 office on March 4, 2002. Unfortunately, the attachments for the Ordinance, as filed, were not correct. The attachments submitted to your office were a draft and were not the documents ultimately and actually approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Enclosed with this cover letter are the correct documents attached to a certified copy of the filed Ordinance. It is staffs understanding that you will re -file the enclosed Ordinance and attachments and then provide a letter confirming the actions taken along with the re -filed documents. Please feel free to contact either Mr. White (number below), or myself, with any questions or comments regarding this re -filin re uest. As you will recall, our approach to resolving this error was agreed to by your office. g q Please return the re -filed documents, and your letter detailing the actions you've taken pursuant to our office's usual procedures. Thank you for your efforts in this matter. y Sincerely, C. Glenn E. Heath, AICP Principal Planner Comprehensive Planning Section cc: w/o enclosure attachments Mr. Patrick G. White, Assistant County Attorney (239) 659 -5709 Mr. Stan Litsinger, AICP, Planning Manager, Comprehensive Planning Section Ms. Ellie Hoffman, Senior Clerk, Minutes & Records, Clerk of Courts Office (941) 403- r (y41) 643 -6968 "- wwwco.collienfl.us PMS, Inc. of Naples 89 Project Management Services EC F FE®1 5 2 002 February 15, 2002 -X_��i _ Glenn Heath AICP Collier County Comprehensive Planning Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Re: Flow Way CDD — Revised Petition and Ordinance Dear Glenn: Please find enclosed a revised petition and ordinance for the Flow Way CDD in accordance with our discussions at today's meeting. I have also included 9 copies of the complete petition package for distribution. Keep in mind that, while there is an original signed petition enclosed, the original consent form and original SERC are still in your files. If you could please incorporate those originals with the revised package, I would appreciate it. If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me. SiN er 1 , aren Bishop President 2335 Tamiami Trail N., Suite 408, Naples, FL 34103 / (941) 435 -9080 x3 / Fax (941) 435 -9082 /Email: irishpms @aol.com BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RE: PROPOSED ORDINANCE PURSUANT TO ) SECTION 190.005 (2), FLORIDA STATUTES ) TO ESTABLISH THE FLOW WAY ) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT ) PETITION TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT DISTRICT MIRASOL DEVELOPMENT, L.L.C., (hereinafter "Petitioner "), by and through its undersigned attorney, hereby petitions the Collier County Board of County Commissioners to adopt an ordinance: 1) establishing and recognizing a Community Development District (hereinafter "District ") pursuant to the Uniform Community Development District Act of 1980, Chapter 190, Florida Statutes, as amended; 2) acknowledging the uniform district charter contained in Sections 190.006 through 190.041 as provided by Section 190.004(4), Florida Statutes, establishing the District on the property described herein within which the District may manage and finance its basic infrastructure systems, facilities and services as provided in its charter; and 3) designating the initial District Board of Supervisors. In support of this petition, Petitioner states: 1. Location and Size. The proposed District is located entirely within unincorporated Collier County, Florida. Exhibit 1 depicts the general location of the project. The proposed district covers approximately 830 acres of land. The site is F. \PMS- CORP \COMPANrC]aussen\Mirasol\cdd- PET ITION\RevisedPetitionfoCDD2.doc Page 1 of 8 located in portions of Section 15 and Section 22, near the intersection of CR 951 and Immokalee Road. The metes and bounds description of the external boundaries of the District is set forth in Exhibit 2. 2. Excluded Parcels. There are no parcels within the external boundaries of the proposed District, which are to be excluded from the District. 3. Landowner Consent. At the time of filing this Petition, all of the land to be included in the District is owned by IMCOLLIER Joint Venture. Petitioner has obtained written consent to establish the District in accordance with Section 190.005, F.S. Documentation of this consent is contained in Exhibit 3. 4. Initial Board Members. The five persons designated to serve as the initial members of the Board of Supervisors of the proposed District is as follows: Christopher G. Claussen 2074 Sevilla Way Naples. FL 34109 Jack Sterling 3221 60 St. SW Naples, FL 34105 Bruce Bowers 1205 Pocantico Lane Naples FL 34110 Mark Alderuccio 5425 Park Central Court Naples, FL 34109 Thomas Barrett 132 -204 Pebble Shores Drive Naples, FL 34110 F. \PMS- CORMOMPANY\ClaussenV NirasoMdd- PETMON \RevisedPetitionfotCDD2.doc Page 2 of 8 All of the above - listed persons are residents of the State of Florida, and citizens of the United States of America. 5. Name. The proposed name of the District is the "Flow Way Community Development District." 6. Existingi Zoning Currently, the lands to be included within the District are zoned PUD. Neighboring lands are principally zoned PUD and AG, as shown in Exhibit 4. 7. Future Land Uses. The future general distribution, location, and extent of the public and private land uses proposed for the District by future land use plan element of the County's Future Land Use Plan is identified on Exhibit 5. The construction of approximately up to 799 residential dwelling units, recreational areas, 36 holes of golf, clubhouse, a swimming and fitness facility, a tennis facility, and a network of trails and parks are authorized for the portions of the development to be included within the District. Development is projected to occur over an estimated 8 -year period. The proposed land uses for the lands contained within the proposed District are consistent with the approved Collier County Future Land Use Plan. 8. Major Water and Wastewater Facilities. Exhibit 6 shows the major trunk water mains and wastewater interceptors within the currently undeveloped lands proposed to be included within the District. A portion of the storm water run -off will be reclaimed for golf course irrigation. It is currently proposed that Collier County will provide water and sewer service to the lands within the District. F: \PMS- CORP\COMPAN11CIaussenV Nirasol\ cdd- PEnTION\RevisedPetitionforCDD2 .doc Page 3 of 8 9. District Facilities and Services. Exhibit 7, attached hereto, depicts the type of facilities the Petitioner presently expects the District to finance, construct and install from approximately 2001 -2008. The estimated costs of construction are also described in Exhibit 7. Actual construction timetables and expenditures will likely vary, due in part to the effects of future changes in the economic conditions upon costs such as labor services materials interest rates, and market conditions. 10. Mitijzation lands for the project in Sections 10 and 15 and to the east of Section 10. The District shall have the authority, pursuant to Section 190.012 (1)(f), Florida Statutes, to exercise all powers under the Act with regard to the mitigation lands depicted as the "Upland Preserve" and "Wetland Preserve" areas on attached Exhibit 8. These mitigation lands are in addition to the mitigation lands located within the boundaries of the District and perpetual maintenance and monitoring is required by the South Florida Water Management District as a condition of Environmental Resource Permit (Application No. 000518 -10). These areas are necessary to construct the public and private land uses identified in Exhibit 5. The District shall comply with all the conditions in the permit issued pursuant to Application 000518 -10 regarding the perpetual maintenance and monitoring of the mitigation areas as depicted in Exhibit 8. 11. Chain (or ribbon) of lakes. The District shall have the authority, pursuant to Section 190.012 (1)(a), Florida Statutes, to exercise all powers under the Act on the water management improvements depicted as the "Flow Way Conveyance" on attached Exhibit 8. These water conveyance improvements provide the necessary legal positive outfall to drain the land uses within the District. These conveyances are also a condition F. \PMS- CORP\COMPANY\Cl aussen\ Mirasol\cdd- PETMON \RevisedPetitionforcDD2.doc Page 4 of 8 for the issuance of the South Florida Water Management District to obtain the Environmental Resource Permits (Applications No. 000518 -10, 010419 -6 and 970923- 12) required for the lands within the District. As part of the reasonable assurances granted to the South Florida Water Management District for the referenced Environmental Resource Permit applications, the District shall comply with all the necessary and required permit conditions in the permits associated with the referenced applications, requiring perpetual maintenance and operation of the Flow Way Conveyance area as depicted in Exhibit 8. To insure that the District has the authority to exercise its powers on all of the water management improvements located outside the geographical boundaries of the District, it has been granted a Drainage Ingress /Egress and Maintenance Easement from the adjacent landowners (Olde Cypress Development, Ltd., and Robert Vocisano, Trustee) over which a portion of these water management improvements are located which is attached as Exhibit 8A. These entities are not located within nor a part of the District, however, in order for Petitioner and these adjacent landowners to obtain their Environmental Resource Permits, the District was required to accept responsibility over the maintenance responsibilities for the Flow Way Conveyance set forth in Exhibit 8. 12. Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs. Exhibit 9 is the statement of estimated regulatory costs ( "SERC ") prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541. Florida Statutes (1997). The SERC is based upon presently available data. The data and methodology used in preparing the SERC, accompany it. F: \PMS- CORP\COMPANY\CIaussen\ Mit asot cdd- PETrnON\RevisedPetitionfo tCDD2.doc Page 5 of 8 '• m 13. Authorized Agent. The Petitioner, Mirasol Development, L.L.C., a Florida Limited Liability Company, is authorized to do business in Florida. The authorized agent for the Petitioner is: Robert G. Claussen 6025 Carlton Lakes Blvd. Naples, FL 34110 See Exhibit 10 — Authorization of Agent. Copies of all correspondence and officiai notices should also be sent to: Dr. Henry Fishkind Fishkind & Associates, Inc. 11869 High Tech Avenue Orlando, FL 32817 And: Ms. Neale Montgomery, Esq. Pavese, Haverfield, Dalton, Harrison, & Jensen, L.L.P. P.O. Drawer 1507 Ft. Myers, FL 33902 -1507 14. This petition to establish the Flow Way Community Development District should be granted for the following reasons: A. Establishment of the District and all land used and services planned within the proposed District are not inconsistent with applicable elements or portions of the effective State Comprehensive Plan or the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. B. The area of land within the proposed District is part of a planned community. It is of a sufficient size and is sufficiently compact and contiguous to be developed as one functional and interrelated community. F. \PMS- C0RM0MPANY\ C1aussen\ Mirasolcdd- PETTTION VtevisedPetitionforCDD2.doc Page 6 of 8 • r • S C. The establishment of the District will prevent the general body of taxpayers in Collier County from bearing the burden for installation of the infrastructure and the maintenance of certain facilities with the development encompassed by the District. The District is the best alternative for delivering community development service and facilities to the proposed community without imposing an additional burden on the general population of the local general- purpose government. Establishment of the District in conjunction with a comprehensively planned community, as proposed, allows for a more efficient use of resources. D. The community development services and facilities of the District will not be incompatible with the capacity and use of existing local and regional community development services and facilities. In addition, the establishment of the District will provide a perpetual entity capable of making reasonable provisions for the operation and maintenance of the District's services and facilities. E. The area to be served by the proposed District is amenable to separate special- district government. WHEREFORE, Petitioner respectfully requests the County Commission of Collier County, Florida to: 1. Direct its staff to schedule a public hearing in accordance with the requirements of Section 190.005 (2) (b). Florida Statutes (1997); F: \PMS- CORMOMPAN71CIaussen\MirasoAedd- PETIT [ON\RevisedPetitionforCDD2.doc Page 7 of 8 2. Grant the petition and adopt an ordinance to establish the District pursuant to Chapter 190, Florida Statutes; 3. Consent to the District's exercise of certain additional special powers to plan, establish, acquire, construct or reconstruct, enlarge or extend, equip, operate and maintain additional systems and facilities for: (i) parks and facilities for indoor and outdoor recreational, cultural, and educational uses; and (ii) security, including, but not limited to, guard- houses, fences and gates, electronic intrusion- detection systems, and patrol cars, when authorized by proper governmental agencies; except that the district may not exercise any police power, but may contract with the appropriate local general- purpose government agencies for an increased level of such services within the District boundaries, all as authorized and described by Section 190.012 (2)(a) and (d), Florida Statutes. 2002. RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this �� day of , By: G harles Mann for Neale Montgomery Pavese, Haverfield, Dalton, Harrison & Jensen, L.L.P. 1833 Hendry Street P.O. Drawer 1507 Fort Myers, FL 33902 -1507 Representatives for the Petitioner • r • a F: \PMS- CORP, COMPANY\ClaussenV Nirasol\ cdd- PETMO"evisedPetitionforCDD2.doc Page 8 of 8 AM List of Exhibits for PETITION TO ESTABLISH A COMMUNITY DEVLOPMENT DISTRICT (Flow Way CDD) Exhibit 1, Depicts the general location of the project Exhibit 2, The metes and bounds description of the external boundaries of the district Exhibit 3, Documentation of consent of landowners Exhibit 4, A map showing existing land use and zoning information within and adjacent to the proposed District Exhibit 5, The future general distribution, location, and extent of the public and Private land uses proposed for the District by future land use plan element of the County's Future Land Use Plan Exhibit 6, Major trunk water mains and wastewater interceptors within the currently undeveloped lands proposed to be included within the District Exhibit 7, Depiction of type of facilities to be built, and estimated timetable and costs of construction Exhibit 8, Mitigation Lands, Water management improvements Exhibit 8A, Drainage, Ingress/Egress and Maintenance Easement Exhibit 9, Statement of estimated regulatory costs ( "SERC ") prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 120.541. Florida Statutes (1997) Exhibit 10, Authorization of agent F: \WPDATA\NM\CCMS\List of Exhibits for petition.doc rd.010 olof!WNL• •IVIYATEVA94 311 N m n z Of I cio-cia 0 LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH I BEARING L1 990.31 L2 1332.41 I N ■W L3 328 98 N g- L4 1332.56 I L5 1 655.72 1 S891061101w L6 I 1332.31 '47 L7 653.40 6•W LS 1331.97 N ■W L9 651.08 •W UO 2662.99 •W L11 988.18 N g' •W L13 139.54 0'48• L14 98.12 •5 '44•W L15 1 38.87 1 N •W L16 75.67 G L17 215.48 N71.44' 'W Lis 90.88 g •W 1.19 74.98 N •W L20 160.49 •4 •W L21 738.04 I . L22 2676.29 I W L23 1334.41 •4 L24 1306.80 g ' •W L25 2667.44 S01 '30-39-E L26 164.50 •W L27 1333.63 01 L28 1155.54 S89.10'34'W C27 I cis I I N i m , i— C30 1 C35 —C37 G m n z Q SECTION 15 — — 19 •- - -. —•— I SECTION 22 � � G I u ' L7 I L24 i i � G I I I mIcn m m I L5 G I z N I . I W I I �amAGNOLI ■::::: ■■■■ . ARBER & ■■ ■ ■i L3 I ■a ■■■■■ . .....:. RUNDAGE, INC. Professional Engineers, PIMcrs & Land Surveyors C.R. cN 740 T•,.innfTni7J.- N.,1•. L- J41M -10a M11ff7- JI tl -ta MII 1iF17oJ W C.r,. 1121 NwL/ 0n..,. iw bl7w, JL JJ001 . 10a M1I 1)13111 h� M11 33-0J Cmifidr e! A•d,•ri001ion N.. Le 3"4 0 W U 3"4 I FOR: J.D. NICEWONDER i G P.O.B. TME: METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION SOUTH 1/4 CORNER FOR THE FLOW WAY CDD Line, ECTION 22 Located In Portions of SECTIONS 22 315, T 46 S, R 26 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FL L1 L29 DRAM BY: ROW ABB PROJECT No.: • • — • •� • — • CHECKED BY: GPA ACAD FILE NAME: 80 02 IMMOKALEE ROAD (S.R. 846) DATE: 09/19/01 COGO FlLE No.: 7883 CG0 SCALE: 1• a 1000' 1 SHEET I OF T. YTTTRTT 7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF NICEWONDER PROPERTY SOUTH A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTIONS 15 AND 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID PARCEL OF LAND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY VV DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; Beginning at the South Quarter Comer of said Section 22; thence S.89'09'08 "W., a distance of 990.31 feet; thence N.01'10'06 "W., a distance of 1,332.41 feet; thence N.89'07'39 "E., a distance of 328.98 feet; thence N.01- 12'59 "W., a distance of 1,332.56 feet; thence S.89'06'10 "W., a distance of 655.72 feet; thence N.01-06'47 W., a distance of 1,332.31 feet; thence S.89'04'26 "W., a distance of 653.40 feet; thence N.01'00'48 "W., a distance of 1,331.97 feet; thence 5.89'02'41 "W., a distance of 651.08 feet; thence N.00'59'06 "W., a distance of 2,662.98 feet; thence N.00'59'00 "W., a distance of 988.18 feet to the point of curve of a non tangent curve to the left, of which the radius point lies N.21'31'58 "W., a radial distance of 359.00 feet; thence northeasterly along the arc, through a central angle of 29'40'27 ", a distance of 185.93 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 381.00 feet and a central angle of 18'46'56 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 124.90 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 312.00 feet and a central angle of 27'38'40 "; northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 150.54 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right havin thence g a radius of 1,988.00 feet and a central angle of 03'33'22 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 123.39 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 412.00 feet and a central angle of 35'06'17 "; thence northerly along the arc, a distance of 252.43 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet on( a central angle of 2447'52 "; thence northerly along the arc, a distance of 81.37 feet; thence N.23'10'48 "E., a distance of 139.54 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 98.00 feet and a central angle of 107'41'02 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 184.18 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 53'55'06 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 199.50 feet; thence N.7656'44 "E., a distance of 98.12 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 88.00 feet and a central angle of 44'42'20 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 68.66 feet; thence S.58'20'56 "E., a distance of 38.87 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of 112.00 feet and a central angle of 71'41'55 thence easterly along the arc a distance of 140.15 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 225.00 feet and a central angle of 28'55'44 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 113.60 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 27'20'10 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 101.15 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 38.00 feet and a central angle of 58'26'43 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 38.76 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 32'15'37 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 119.37 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet and a central angle of 23'02'51 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 75.62 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 46'44'53 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 172.97 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet and a central angle of 28'19'29 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 92.94 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 30'42'52 "; thence northeasterly along the arc, a distance of 113.65 feet; thence N.51'38'22 "E., a distance of 75.67 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 188.00 feet and a central angle of 56'37'01 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 185.77 feet; thence S.71'44'38 "E., a distance of 215.48 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of 312.00 feet and a central angle of 15'36'30 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 84.99 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 138.00 feet and a central angle of 30'18'09 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 72.99 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 162.00 feet and a central angle of 38'42'28 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 109.44 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 138.00 feet and a central angle of 34'16'32 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 82.55 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 162.00 feet and a central angle of 32'18'53 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 91.37 feet; thence N.86'12'12 "E., a distance of 80.88 feet to a point of curve to the right having a radius of 138.00 feet (SEE SHEET 3 OF 3 FOR CONTINUATION) GENERAL NOTES: 1. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. 2. R.O.W. = RIGHT -OF -WAY. 3. CURVE DIMENSIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: A - DELTA, R - RADIUS, A - ARC, CH = CHORD, AND CHB = CHORD BEARING 4. BEARINGS ARE ASSUMED BASED ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, BEING N 89'10'34" E. 5. TOTAL AREA = 829.74 ACRES MORE OR LESS. * NOT A SURVEY * ii::::ADARBER & muumuu =:::n BRUNI AGE, , INC. Professional Engineers, Planners & Land Surveyors ca..Caa 7408T.Ii- iT,W".- r.,w,. FL•14106 -n.., 0411 mai„•Fa 0411rKS o1 I US "..d., 1s.a•FaMT ,FL11f01- FL, p111 J1T•]tll-Fu:C"03+1111 f:artGo" of Au-,-lm No,. La 16" -d E! 3664 1' - J.D. NICEWONDER METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FOR THE FLOW WAY CDD Line, Located In Portions of SECTIONS 22 31 S, T 48 S, R 26 E. COLLIER COUNTY, FL. EXHIBIT 2 CURVE TABLE C9 c, c, (CONTINUED FROM SHEET 2 OF 3) and a central angle of 93'01'46 ", thence southeasterly along the arc a distance of 224.07 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 312.00 feet and a central angle of 60'40'03 thence southeasterly along the arc, a distance of 330.36 feet to a point of compound curve to the left having a radius of 112.00 feet and a central angle of 29'30'43 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 57.69 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 308.00 feet and a central angle of 71'16'11 "; thence southeasterly along the arc, a distance of 383.12 feet to a point of compound curve to the right having a radius of 908.00 feet' and a central angle of 30'33'57 "; thence southerly along the arc, a distance of 484.39 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 112.00 feet and a central angle of 68'43'29 ", thence southeasterly along the arc, a distance of 134.34 feet; thence S.57'50'09 "E., a distance of 74.98 feet to a point of curve to the left having a radius of 512.00 feet and a central angle of 3722'29 "; thence easterly along the arc a distance of 333.98 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 488.00 feet and a central angle of 18'16'33 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 155.66 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 512.00 feet and a central angle of 33'19'39 thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 297.82 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 488.00 feet and a central angle of 20'54'59 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 178.15 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 212.00 feet and a central angle of 25'30'56 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 94.41 feet to a point of reverse curve to the right having a radius of 588.00 feet and a central angle of 21'09'09 ", thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 217.08 feet to a point of reverse curve to the left having a radius of 103.00 feet and a central angle of 30'35'07 "; thence easterly along the arc, a distance of 54.98 feet; thence N.55'42'20 "E., a distance of 160.49 feet; thence S.01'43'53 "E., a distance of 738.04 feet; thence S.01'41'44 "E., a distance of 2,676.29 feet; thence S.01'42'40 "E., a distance of 1,334.41 feet; thence S.89'04'26 "W., a distance of 1,306.80 feet; thence S.01'30'39 "E., a distance of 2,667.44 feet; thence S.89'08'23 "W., , . feet; thence S.89'10'34 "W., a distance of a distance of 164.50 feet; thence S.01'29'06 "E., a distance of 133363 ft 1,155.54 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. containing 829.74 acres, more or less; subject to easements and restrictions of record. 4GNOLI, BAI 3rofessional 3Y Guy P * NOT A SURVIE-Y INDAGE, INC. Planners & Land Surveyors P.S.M. # 4390 :■■■ BARBER & ••01111■1 RUNDAGE, INC. Professional Engineers, Planners & Land Surveyors Cotl4r Cwepe 7M0 T."i,r Tr.i N,. N„Y,, R. 4508.1%, (NU W -1111 • Rv 04115664M la.= ' Hui, fwm•tw,*, FL55N1 fYa P4113374111 -F= 041111+•1175 Catkw of Mlh -6-6w N4. L6 7K/ ud Ea lK4 F0R' J.D. NICEWONDER nn.e: METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION FOR THE FLOW WAY CDD Line, located In PorUons of SECTIONS 22 31S, T 48 S, R 26 E. COLUER COUNTY, FL EXHIBIT 2 EXHIBIT 3 Consent and Joinder of Landowners To Establishment of a Community Development District The undersigned is the owner of certain lands more fully described on Exhibit 2 attached hereto and made a s hereof ( "Property "). p The undersigned understands and acknowledges that Mirasol Development, L.L.C. ( "Petitioner") intends to subm an application to establish a Community Development District in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 190 c the Florida Statutes. As an owner of lands which are intended to constitute the Community Development District, the undersi nec understands and acknowledges that pursuant to the provisions of Section 190.0005, Florida Statutes, the Petitioner is required to include the written consent to the establishment of the Community Development District o one Kindred percent (100 %) of the owners of the lands to be included within the Community Development District. The undersigned hereby consents to the establishment of a Community Development District which will include the Property within the lands to '�e part of the Community Development District and agrees to further execute an documentation necessary or convenient to evidence this consent and joinder during the application process for the establishment of the Community Development District. The undersigned acknowledges that the consent will remain in full force and effect until the Community Development District is established or three years from the date hereof, which ever shall first occur. The undersigned further agrees that it will provide to the next purchaser or successor in interest of all or any portion of the Property a copy of this consent form obtain, if requested by Petitioner, a consent to establishment of the Community Development District in substantially this form. The undersigned hereby represents and warrants that it has taken all actions and obtained all consents necessary to duly authorize the execution of this consent and joinder by the officer executing this instrument. Executed this day, September 1, 2001 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER IMCOLLIER JOINT VENTURE, A Florida General Partnership, By: Mirasol Development, LLC A Florida Limited Liability Company, Managing Venturer kLa4`1--�- Robe G. Claussen, Managing Member The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1 day of September, Robert G. Claussen, Managing Member, on behalf of W I -- - -- pFMAL NOTARY SEAL. ' V4Y P`0, JOHN J STERLING 2 1 n comas" Wimm n, < CC730692 WWON E Or�O YY CAPOq 290X1 M or Ft 2001, by •0 • • a • to Li 0 w ui LU C1 w 0 m 00 �d P-4 T 48 S T 47 S T 48 S T 49 S T 50 S T 51 S T 52 S T 53 S uS� P .r LU oe $ z 9 r' t` g � a , III •t. I � ,., I ly a g y t k i ir��b 4 :: r r.' Y r •t � � i }r I' .d • . + 7 4 yr r I rt ' 1 � e � > 1 � s� i ra �I� 1 tl .1 0 1.1 7 l�•tA �`, 'i � � { �� It', i '(f! i �'i AI! A 1 I �� /�1 ))1 ✓ � i � I i < i� %tr' ^*#fl'�id iR1�Pl1USa I I 1" i 9 i ri 1! � � � j g .•a..l•. .. , r�.._r •• I t. , ;''r Imo:'} t I ; 1,;1� I ....I, i • _ C jj f 2 N N a i� _ .7. V, 1 /• f r. f�.i1..4 .I ' ••; t��r - Do W < aiF j F W yLL < 4 h 7 F2 N > W qq < N g o uj MZ 11YY g a i <D ❑1400.❑ 0 a❑ i I ®�. < .. N r F E F, O g C F Ifl +, aim Z ul • '�I ui b 4 $n o R YU606U6 (J QO a: N aC m d E N a u z a e� d b 333 y 0s < m r < Lu _ b a go, a El 0 m HE 0 In 1 aw WNW uj W - z J I 1.1 a W Z �. W - �I. W W CD < Kn < pZ�K H yam• ; r." �. ',� C! N ( I g I_. 1 t: t� S •` "gip, r V a 1 i bi 1 ,r W 1 N 3 1 195 � 30'13�t 1 1 }.� F I /,J SO I 1 i bi 1 ,r W 1 N 3 1 195 � 30'13�t 1 1 }.� F I /,J 1 i bi 1 ,r W 1 N 3 1 195 � 30'13�t 1 1 uj N Q W m �o j u �b� W ua gF� N o S 19 1 1 S Z5 1 I S £4 1 I Exhibit S Page 2 of 3 a. Presently developed sites; 8B • b. Sites where water - dependent or water - related uses have been previously established; C. Sites where shoreline improvements are in place; d. Sites where damage to viable, naturally functioning wetlands, or other envirormentaliy sensitive features, could be minimized. Port of the Islands is a unique development, which is located within the Urban Designated Area, but is also totally within the Big Cypress Area of Critical State Concern. However, a portion of the development was determined "vested" by the State of Florida, thus exempting it from the requirements of Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Further, there is an existing Development Agreement between Port of the Islands, Inc. and the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs dated July 2, 1985, which regulates land uses at Port of the Islands. Port of the Islands is eligible for all provisions of the Urban - Mixed Use District in which it is located to the extent that the overall residential density and commercial intensity does not exceed that permitted under zoning at time of adoption of this Plan. I. Urban Residential Subdistrict The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned public facilities are concentrated. This Subdistrict comprises approximately 93,000 acres and 80% of the Urban Mixed Use District. Maximum eligible residential density shall be determined through the Density Rating System but shall not exceed 16 dwelling units per acre except in accordance with the Transfer of Development Rights Section of the Land Development Code. L� 2. Urban Coastal Fringe Subdistrict • The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the Conservation Designated Area and the Urban Designated Area. It includes that area south of US r between the City of Naples and Collier - Seminole State Park, including Marco Island and comprises approximately 18,000 acres and 15% of the Urban Mixed Use District. In order to facilitate hurricane evacuation and to protect the adjacent environmentally sensitive Conservation Designated Area, residential densities shall be limited to a maximum of 4 dwelling units per acre, except as allowed in the Density Rating System to exceed 4 units per acre through provision of Affordable Housing and Transfer of Development Rights, and except as provided in the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Overlay. Rezones are recommended to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development. The Marco Island Master Plan shall provide for density, intensity, siting criteria and specific standards for land use districts on Marco Island. 3. Urban Residential Frin le Subdistrict The purpose of this Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the Urban Designated Area and the Agricultural/Rural Area and comprises approximately 5,500 acres and 5% of the Urban Mixed Use District. Residential land uses may be allowed at a maximum density of 1.5 units per gross acre, subject to the following conditions: and are not subject to the Density Rating System: a. All rezones are encouraged to be in the form of a Planned Unit Development; and b. Proposed development in the area shall be fully responsible for all necessary water management improvements, including the routing of all on -site and appropriate off -site water through the project's water management system, and a fair share cost of necessary improvements to the CR 951 canal /out -fall system made necessary by new development • in the area. (IV) = Plan Amendment CP- 2000 -1 adopted by Ordinance No. 2000 -87 on December 12, 2000 Exhibit 5 Page 3 f 8d the asphalt plant: is compatible with surrounding land uses; is not located in a Coun , Sh or Federal jurisdictional wetland area and any required buffer zones; is not located within e 1,000 feet of a Florida State Park; is not located within the Area of Critical State Concern as depicted on the Future Land Use Map; and, is not located within 1,000 feet of a natural reservation ` I• Commercial uses accessory to other permitted uses, such as restaurant accessory to golf course or retail sales of produce accessory to farming, so long as restrictions or limitations are imposed to insure the commercial use functions as an accessory, subordinate use. Such restrictions or limitations could include limiting the size and /or location of the commercial use and /or limiting access to the commercial use; m. Commercial uses, within the Rural Commercial Subdistrict, based upon criteria; n. Industrial uses within the Rural - Industrial District; o. Travel trailer recreational vehicle parks, provided the following criteria are met: 1. The density is consistent with the Land Development Code; 2. The site has direct principal access to a road classified as an arterial in the Traffic Circulation Element, direct principal access defined as a driveway and /or roadway connection to the arterial road, with no access points from intervening properties; and, 3. The use will be compatible with surrounding land uses. {1) A. Agricultural /Rural Mixed Use District The purpose of this District is to protect and encourage agricultural activities, conserve and preserve environmentally sensitive areas, provide for low density residential development, and other uses identified under the Agricultural /Rural Designation. These areas generally lack public facilities and services. Urbanization is not promoted, therefore most allowable land uses are of low intensity in an effort to maintain and promote the rural character of these lands. Residential uses are allowed as follows, subiect to the Interim Development Provisions: a. Low density residential dwelling units, at a maximum density of one dwelling unit per five gross acres, except for legal non - conforming lots of record., b. Dormitories, duplexes and other staff housing, as may be provided in conjunction with conservation uses, at a density in accordance with the Land Devel Code; opment Code; c. Group housing uses at a density in accordance with that permitted in the Land Development d. Staff housing in conjunction with safety service facilities and essential services, at a density in accordance with the Land Development Code; e. Farm labor housing in accordance with the Farm Labor Housing provision in the Land Development Code; f. Recreation camps as defined in, and at the density allowed by, the Land Development Code. 9. Existing units approved for the Fiddler's Creek DRI may be reallocated to those parts of Sections 18 and 19, Township 51 South, Range 27 East added to Fiddler's Creek DRI together with part of Section 29, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, at a density greater than 1 unit per 5 gross acres provided that no new units are added to the 6,000 previously approved units, which results in a gross density of 1.6 units per acre for the Fiddler's Creek DRI; and further provided that no residential units shall be located on that part of Section 29 within the Fiddler's Creek DRI; and further provided that South Florida Water Management District jurisdictional wetlands impacted by the DRI in said Sections do not exceed 10 acres. (I) 1. Rural Commercial Subdistrict Within the Agricultural /Rural - Mixed Use District, commercial development, u to a of 200 acres, may be allowed providing the following standards for intensity of use are metum • and subject to the Interim Development Provisions. a. The project, or that portion of a larger project, which is devoted to commercial 35 as FAM rl 13 PZJ VIA up.,, 13 iffAi FR Z 13 HIM • 771 Flo p ......... .......... ........... 9 q"l -WIM IM 0111 ' 4. A-mile ......... .... OFF RA 1 L 10 o. ........... .......... .......... ................. ............. ........... ....... ........... ........... ....... ........ ....... .......... . . . . . . . . . ................... . ...... .......... .................. ............. ............. ..................... ..................... ............. .......... ...... ........ ......... .... ........ .......... ................ ........... .......... ........... ............ ............. .................. ..... ...... ``�� :e U _H Z O U S� O J LL pr J O Q N m N O N f- w r Of Of °o c r co � V O H to� r t� K H y 40 6911 a N ^ 2 �-- ie ^ ^ O N r � 099 r H 44 69 N 69 Ln N c O O Of ^ M er f0 cli C �j ��C', N r O O C ^ rl ES 69 y� rM! 69 v n 0 v r� f9 611. 64 69 8 cq Ol 69 H K H 69 N 6r9 W z co f- O >- p N CO h- j Z w C7 j U W ir U o6 Z w _Z U Z w U F= N ¢ LU p J W N Z F- s�3ZzWo g w a v r (14 W) ^ CID O) F- t0 01 C m 03 w co O CN r r fy � 4s � r► �. Ln N c O O Of ^ M er f0 cli C �j ��C', N r O O C ^ rl ES 69 y� rM! 69 v n 0 v r� f9 611. 64 69 8 cq Ol 69 H K H 69 N 6r9 W z co f- O >- p N CO h- j Z w C7 j U W ir U o6 Z w _Z U Z w U F= N ¢ LU p J W N Z F- s�3ZzWo g w a v r (14 W) ^ CID O) F- POTENTIAL EASEMENT v ...>< ll; EXHIBIT g g N d 4 ° ' 21MOO 4000 SMUZ UPLAND PRESERVE MIRASOI 100.8 ACRES FLOW -WAY UPLAND WETLAND PRESERVE 746.2 ACRES FLOW -WAY WETLAND FLOW -WAY CONVEYANCE 36.5 ACRES WITHIN MIRASOL 25.6 ACRES WITHIN TERAFINA 29.3 ACRES WITHIN OLDE CYPRESS COCONATCN!lCANAL "'AlOKALLE[ ROAD C R t f y J'�y,� tIrN R diS tiA� tFW LR OR FlrAY aN EXMBIT 8A Prepared by and return to: Kenneth w. Dodge LEWIS, LONGMAN & WALKER. P.A. 1700 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd. # 1000 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 DRAINAGE, INGRESS/EGRESS AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT 8 8, . �Al I THIS EASEMENT, granted this Robert Vocisano, as Co- Trustee under Land Trust Agreement dated Ma y 24, 1995, and d between OLDE CYPRESS DEVELOPMENT, LTD., hereinafter collectively called "Gr antors and J.D. Nicewonder, hereinafter called "Grantee" and his successors and assigns. gns WHEREAS, Grantors Vocisano is Co- Trustee of certain property known as Tl✓RAFINA, a portion of which is described in Exhibit "A" attached and incorporated herein, with full powers to protect same; and to which certain Property ' conserve, sell, encumber or otherwise dispose of was issued District ERP Permit # WHEREAS, Grantor Olde Cypress is the owner of certain property OLDE CYPRESS, a portion of which is described in Exhibit attached down as incorporated herein, with full powers to "B" atta protect, conserve, sell, encumber or of dispose of same; and to which certain property was issued Permit # henvise WHEREAS, Grantee Nicewonder is the owner of certain pro e MIRASOL which desires to construct a flow way for the drainage of surface known as Cocohatchee Canal: and to which certain property was issued Of ERP a ter to the Permit # WITNESSETH That for and in consideration of the sum of ten dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Grantors hereby grant to Grantee and its successors and assigns, a Drainage Ingress and Egress Maintenance Easement ( "Easement ") over their respective properties described in the and attached Exhibits A & B for the purpose of the drainage of surface waters, together with an easement for ingress and egress to enter upon the above described lands and to construct, operate and maintain these lands in accordance with this Drainage, Ingress/Egress and Maintenance Easement and Permit # Permit # in perpetuity, and Permit # and This Easement granted herein is subject to the following terms and limitations: 1 In the event an entity is created to operate and maintain the above referenced lands in Exhibits A and B in accordance with this Ease and Permit #_ and permit # ,Grantee shall ment, and Permit # assign this Easement to said entity together with all rights of access, maintenance and construction 8B contained herein. Failure to do so may result in violation of th referenced ERP permits. a above 2. Should Grantee be required to access lands immediately d' Easement area in the course of constructing, operating or maintainio the Easement, Grantors shall not unreasonably withhold the granting said construction Easements to accomplish same. ;� anting of temporary IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantors have executed same to be executed by their representatives, there unto duly this instrument or caused the Year first above written. n the day and Witnesses: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF OLDE CYPRESS DEVELOPMENT, LTD. BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, duly authorized to take oaths, appeared who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification and has signed the fore oin SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE g g instrument. 2001. ME this day of NOTARY PUBLIC/ STATE OF FLORIDA My commission expires: 2 Witnesses: ROBERT VOCISANO Co- Trustee under Land Trust Agreement dated May 24, 1995 of TeraFina Development STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF d BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, duly authorized to take oaths, appeared who is personally known to me or who has Produced as identification and has signed the foregoing instrumez*. SWORN To AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME this __ day of 2001. My commission expires: [:\Client Documents\&4ims oIW247\Misc\Eesement.doc 3 NOTARY PUBLIC/ STATE OF FLORIDA a • Exhibit 9 Page 1 of S 1.0 Introductio n STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED REGULATORY COSTS S 88 1.1 Purpose and Scope This Statement of Estimated Regulatory Costs ( "SERC ") su o Community Development District ( "District" pp its the petition to form the Flow Wa. acres of land located in Collier County, Florida. he limitations ions District comprises approximately 95 set out in Section 190.002(2)(d), F.S. ons on the scope of. this SERC are explicitll (governing District formation or alteration) as folio ) "That the process of establishing such a district pursuant to based oni on f ctors material to mans in rid finansu the uniform general law shall be fair and so that an matter concernin ermittin or lannin of the develice delivery function of the district, (emphasis added.)" ment i-z nr►* 1.2 Overview of the Flow Way Community Development District The District is designed to provide community infrastructure s operations and maintenani:e, to the services and facilities along with their Development District will be an upscale, fully proposed a esidenvelopment. Flow Way teal golf course Community.ommunity. The proposed development plan for the lands within the District single family residential dwelling units, recreational areas, 36 holes the construction of up to 799 and fitness facility, a tennis facility, and a network of trails and arks f golf, a golf clubhouse, a swim development to be included within the District. p is authorized for portions of the 1.3 Requirements for Statement of Estimated Regulato ry Costs Section 120.541(2), F.S. (1997), defines the elements a statement contain: of estimated regulatory costs must "(a) A good faith estimate of the number of individuals and enti with the rule, together with a general description of the ties likely to be required to comply the rule. types of individuals likely to be affected by (b) A good faith estimate of the cost to the agency, and to an entities, of implementing and enforcing the proposed rule, and an y other state and local government local revenues. y anticipated effect on state and (c) A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred including local governmental entities, required to comply wifih the r in this paragraph, "transactional costs" are r by individuals and entities, standard business practices, and include direct costs that are readily ascertainable rule. based used equipment required to be installed or used on proceduresre ost of obtaining a licensee the cost the rule, additional operating costs incurred, and the cost of monitoring be employed in complying with rig and reporting, Exhibit 9 P8e R of S (d) An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined b analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined Section on 12 3, F.S. an( County is not defined as a small county for purposes .of this requirement. by Section 120.52, F.S. Cc (e) Any additional information that the agency determines may be Y useful. (f) In the statement or revised statement, whichever applies, a description Proposal submitted under paragraph (1) (a) and either a statement do of any good faith writ statement of the reasons for rejecting the alternative in favor of the Proposed the alternative o p posed rule. 2.0 A good faith estimate of the number of individuals r nd equired to comply with the ordinance, together with a general d entities likely to of individuals likely to be affected by the ordinance. description of the typ As noted above, Flow Way Community Development District is a residential Up to 799 total residential units. Formation of the proposed District would P community designed f under the jurisdiction of the proposed District, put all of these householc 3.0 Good Faith estimate of the cost to state and local implementing and enforcing the proposed ordinance, and an government entities, o and local revenues. y anticipated effect on stat+ 3.1 Costs to Governmental Agencies of Implementing and Enforcing Ordinance State Govemmentai Entities There will be only modest ' costs to various State governmental entities to i Proposed formation of the District. The District has fewer than 1,000 acres so ent and enforce the establishing entity under 190.005 (2). F.S. The modest costs to various State Collier County is the and enforce the proposed ordinance relate strictly to the receipt and roc to entities to implement that the proposed District is required to file with the State and its various the reporting requirements. The costs to those essi of various reports ose State agencies that will receive entities. and p process it the District's reports are very small, because the District Is only one of many governmental units that are required to submit the various reports. Therefore, the marginal cost of rocessi Of report is inconsequential. Additionally, p ng one additional set must pay an annual fee to the State of Florida Department of C 189'412, F.S., the proposed district costs, Community Affairs, which offsets such Collier Count✓ Since the proposed District 11 in Collier County and consists of less than 1 and its staff will process, analyze and vote upon the petition to establish the D' ,000 acres, Collier County will absorb some resources. istrrct. These activities Furthermore, even these costs to the County are modest for a number of re petition to establish the District does not include analysis of the project itself. s' First, review of the itself provides much of the information needed for a staff review. Third local governments routinely Exhibit 9 Page 3 of 5 Process similar petitions for land uses and zoning changes that are far more complex than petition to establish a community develo me t d' V n istnct. 3.2 Impact on State and Local Revenues • 2 Akio] Adoption of the proposed ordinance will have no negative impact on State or local revenues. District is an independent unit of local government. It is designed to provide community facilities services to serve the Mirasol development project. It has its own sources of revenue. No State local subsidies are required or expected. In this regard it is important to note than any debt obligations incurred by the District�to construct Infrastructure, or for any _other reason, are not debts of the State of Florida or any unit of log government. In accordance with State law, debts of the District are strictly its own responsibility. 4.0 A good faith estimate of the transactional costs likely to be incurred by individ and entities required to comply with the requirements of the ordinance. ua Table 1 provides an outline of the various facilities and services the proposed District may provid The drainage facilities will all be funded, operated and owned by the District. The District will al; fund the construction of the water and sewer distribution system. However, the County will own ar operate the water and sewer system serving the District. Table 1. Flow Way Community Development District Proposed Facilities and Services FACILITY FUNDED BY Drainage O & M BY OWNERSHIP CDD Water /Sewer CDD CDD CDD Roadways /Street Lighting CDD County County Recreation CDD CDD CDD CDD Mitigation CDD CDD CDD Landscaping CDD CDD CDD CDD The petitioner has estimated the design and development costs for providing the capital facilities outlined in Table 2. The cost estimates are shown in Table 2 below. Total design and development costs for these facilities are estimated to be approximately $55,694,575. The District may issuE special assessment or other revenue bonds to fund the development of these facilities. These bond: would be repaid through non ad valorem assessments levied on all properties in the District that may benefit from the District's capital improvement program as outlined in Table 2. Prospective future landowners in the District may be required to pay non -ad valorem assessments levied by the District to secure the debt incurred through bond Issuance. In additional to the levy of non ad valorem assessments for debt service, the District may also impose a non ad valorem assessment to fund the operations maintenance of the District and its facilities and services. Furthermore, locating in the District by new residents is completely voluntary. So, ultimately, all owners and users of the affected property choose to accept the non -ad valorem assessments as tradeoff for the numerous benefits and facilities that the District provides. Exhibit 9 Page 4 of 5 " 8B A Community Development District ("CDD ) provides residents with the option of having higher Ii of facilities and services financed through self - imposed charges. The District is an alternative m to finance necessary community services. District financing is no more expensive, and often expensive, than the alternatives of a municipal service taxing unit (MSTU), a neighbor[ association, County provision, or-through developer equity and /or bank loans. In considering these costs it shall be noted that occupants of the lands to be included within District will receive three major classes of benefits. First, those residents and businesses in the District will receive a higher level of public services amenities sooner than would otherwise be the case. Second, a CDD is a mechanism for assuring that the community services and amenities will completed concurrently with development of lands within the District. This satisfies the rew growth management legislation, and it assures that growth pays for Itself without undue burden other consumers. Establishment of the District will ensure that these landowners pay for the prov s of facilities, services and improvements to these lands. Third, A CDD is the sole form of governance which allows District landowners, through landowi voting and ultimately electoral voting for resident elected boards, to determine the type, quality a expense of District services they receive, provided they meet the County's overall requirements. The cost impact on the ultimate landowners in the District is not the total cost for the District provide Infrastructure services and facilities. Instead, it is the incremental costs above what t landowners would have paid to install infrastructure via an alternative financing mechanism. Giv the low cost of capital for a CDD, the cost impact to landowners is negligible. This incremental cost the high quality infrastructure provided by the District is likely to be fairly low. Table 2. Cost Estimate for District Facilities CATEGORY COST Roadways Land Clearing Utilities $ 1,547,825 Infrastructure $ 10,887,143 $ 7,524,168 Mitigation & Acquisition $ 7,0001000 Water Management System $ 13,427,892 Landscape Engineering $ 5,663,890 Permitting $ 5,568,689 Contingency $ 844,441 $3,1054409 TOTAL $ 55,694,575 Table 3. Probable Cost Estimate and Estimated Timetable. Attached is Table 3, which is an estimate of probable costs and timetable of improvements. Exhibit 9 Page 5 of 5 5.0 An analysis of the impact on small businesses as defined b Se , and an analysis of the impact on small counties and small cities as defined by Sep 120.52, F.S. There will be no impact on small business because of the formation of the proposed Distrij anything, the impact may be positive. This is because the District must competitively bid all c contracts. This affords small businesses the opportunity to bid on District work. Collier County has an estimated population (not incarcerated) in 1998 that is greater than 75 Therefore the County is not defined as a small county according to Section 120.52, F.S. 6.0 Any additional useful information. The analysis provided above is based on a straightforward application of economic theory, es eci; as it relates to tracking the incidence of regulatory costs and benefits. Inputs were received from Developer's Engineer and other professionals associated with the Developer. Prepared by: .I EXHIBIT 1 o 1, Robert G. Claussen, Managing Member of Mirasol Development L.L.C., hereby u individuals as authorized agents in matters involving Mirasol Development L.L.C. and/or Community Development District, and /or IMCOLLIE Y �0nzes the following R Joint Venture, with any Gov rnmental Agency, including but not limited to Collier County Board of County Commissioners. Dr. Henry Fishkind Fishkind & Associates, Inc. 11869 High Tech Avenue Orlando, FL 32817 and Ms. Neale Montgomery, Esq. Pavese, HaverFeld, Dalton, Harrison, Jensen, LLP. 1833 Hendry Street:, Ft. Myers, FL 33902 Executed this day, September 1, 2001 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER IMCOLLIER JOINT VENTURE, A Florida General Partnership, By: Mirasol Development, LLC A Florida Limited Liability Company, Managing Venturer BY: Robert G. Claussen, Managing Member The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1 day of September, 2001, by Robert G. Claussen, Managing Member Mirasol Development LLC, on beha IMCOLLIER Joint Venture and/or Mirasol Development LLC. He is nercnnail., if of me. 0c ZN v sw 2 1T`�Y pv6�i JOHN J E"om n 00 M CCT3089Z F4 F`p�0 AP 2002 loo DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 1, 2002 10E 4 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 12 5 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CONDEMNATION OF FEE SIMPLE INTERESTS AND /OR THOSE PERPETUAL OR TEMPORARY EASEMENT INTERESTS NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FOUR - LANING ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS TO IMMOKALEE ROAD PROJECT BETWEEN WILSON BOULEVARD AND 43RD AVENUE NORTHEAST, CIE NO. 71. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners (Board), on May 9, 2000, adopted Ordinance No. 2000 -31 therein establishing the (Ninth Annual Update and Amendment) Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan in order to establish priorities for the design, acquisition and construction of the various capital improvement projects; and WHEREAS, the Transportation Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan was adopted in Ordinance No. 2000 -32; and WHEREAS, the four - laning improvements to Immokalee Road between Wilson Boulevard and 43rd Avenue Northeast is one of the capital improvement projects required under the Transportation Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the location for construction of the proposed improvements has been fixed by survey and is collectively represented by the legal descriptions comprising Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, after consideration of the availability of alternate routes and locations, the comparative costs of project alternatives, various impacts upon the environment, long range planning options, and public safety considerations, the Board desires to exercise its right to condemn property for public purposes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that it has been determined by the Board that the construction of the four - laning roadway improvements to Immokalee Road between Wilson Boulevard and 43rd Avenue Northeast (hereinafter referred to as "the Project "), is necessary and in the public's best interest in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Collier County. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that construction of the Project is part of the County's long range planning effort, and is included in the Transportation Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan for Growth Management, as approved by the Florida Department of Community Affairs. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Staff has reviewed alternative locations for the Project, and the costs associated with the design, property rights acquisition, and construction of the Project, as well as public safety and welfare considerations associated with the design and construction of the Project, and various impacts to the environment, and the Board finds that after consideration of these Page 1 issues, the most feasible location for construction of the proposed improvements is collectively represented by the legal descriptions comprising Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that in order to construct the Project as designed, it is necessary for the Board to acquire the various real property interests described in Exhibit "A" to wit: fee simple interests and/or those perpetual or temporary easement interests. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that all property shall be put to public purposes. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the County staff is hereby authorized to immediately acquire by condemnation, in accordance with the provisions of Chapters 73, 74 and 127, Florida Statutes, the above - referenced real property interests more particularly described in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and incorporated herein. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that no mobile homes are located on the property sought to be acquired and therefore it will not be necessary to remove any mobile homes from the property to be acquired. This Resolution adopted on thiso9G,stt day of ��t- , 2002, after motion, second and majority vote. Attest as to Cha lr EM's sipatwrt 441y. ;�ATtTEST: DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK �Qy kVe App -r oved as to form and legal sufficiency Heidi F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney Page 2 2 • �� r D I > Ld I : I m z ►- o w 0 J L O O n W 0 I o O Z I 50.00' r-- I I I I I 12A kCccL 14PS 3 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 846 N 86'50'45 E 350.64' ig 16 ISM AE GL Z Z MARIA T ONZA1030 O.R. 1318, PG. N 89'40'50" W 350.00' I I ' DESCRIPTION: The Northerly 79.05 feet of Tract 16 of Golden Gate Estates Unit 23 as recorded in Plat Book 7 at Page 9 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Containing 0.636 acres more or less. fts;Mft 507 �-4 9 0 50 100 200 M n W a O_ O O M Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. DAVID J. HYA P. *E,SIGNATURE THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. NO.i 834 NOT VALID WITHOU. _ AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORID/ LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION %%%:AS' LK ISON "C SOCIATES INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB W. 0. N0. DRAWN BY FILE NAME AS NOTED GGE 23 0014.1 EAW 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. NO. 09/01 1 OF 1 DJH IR— L -168B 0.000 j J PACIC�-L- 1(09 r FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IMMOKALEE ROAD .R S. 846 EXHH51T,4--, DESCRIPTION: The Northerly 79.05 feet of Tract 17 of Golden Gate Estates Unit 23 as recorded in Plat Book 7 at Page 9 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Containing 0.600 acres more or less. SCALE S of FIRM) JRE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISoN "C ASSOCIATES INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SUB W.O. N0. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I GGE 23 0014.1 1 EAW I 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG I CHECKED BYJ DWG. N0. 09/01 1 OF 1 1 DJH I IR —L -169 J r N 89'40'50" W 330.00' Description: 4. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. A portion of Tract 18, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 9, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest Corner of said Tract 18; thence North 86'50'45" East, for a distance of 319.80 feet to the beginning of a tangential circular curve, concave Northerly, thence run Easterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 5,334.46 feet, through a central angle of 00'06'58 ", subtended by a chord of 10.81 feet at a bearing of North 86'47'16" East, for an arc length of 10.81 feet to the end of said curve, and the Northeasterly Corner of said Tract 18; thence South 00'19'10" West, along the Easterly Boundary of said Tract 18, for a distance of 78.83 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northerly, whose radius point bears North 03'51'59" West, a distance of 4,390.18 feet therefrom; thence run Westerly, along the arc of ., said curve to the right, having a radius of 4,390.18 feet, through a central angle of 00'44'21 ", subtended by a chord of 56.64 feet at a bearing of South DAVID J. P.S. OR THE FIRM) 86'30'11" West, for an arc length of 56.64 feet to the end of said curve; FLA. LIC. N r,51�34 thence South 86'50'45" West, for a distance of 273.99 feet; thence North NOT VAUD OU E SIGNATURE AND 00'19'10" East, along he Westerly Boundary of said Tract 18, for a distance of THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF E FLORIDA 9 Y Y LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER 79.16 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.600 acres, more or less. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION VIA WILKISON 8c ASSOCIATES INC. W ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME I AS NOTED I GGE 23 1 0014.1 1 EAW 100- 018— OOO.DWG DATE 09/01 ro /3 /o l SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 1 OF 1 1 1 DJH DWG. NO IR —L -170 J PAeCc -L o INTEREST EX FEE SIMPLE of l0 IMMOKALEE ROAD .46 L — =10.81 _— — S.R. 846 Tan =5.40 POINT OF BEGINNING: 319.80' A= 0'06'58" N 86'50'45" E _ —� -- PO co 00 PARC EL 170 r` a; 273.99 R= 4390.18 S 86'50'45" W L =56.64 Tan =30.83 18 A=0'44'21" LIGHTCAP 0 50 100 200 EARL BARBARA LIGHTCAP W O.R. 1986, PG- 596 W Notes: a ° 0 1. This is not a survey. o) r 0 � 0 2. Basis of bearing is plat. Z Z 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. N 89'40'50" W 330.00' Description: 4. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. A portion of Tract 18, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 9, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest Corner of said Tract 18; thence North 86'50'45" East, for a distance of 319.80 feet to the beginning of a tangential circular curve, concave Northerly, thence run Easterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 5,334.46 feet, through a central angle of 00'06'58 ", subtended by a chord of 10.81 feet at a bearing of North 86'47'16" East, for an arc length of 10.81 feet to the end of said curve, and the Northeasterly Corner of said Tract 18; thence South 00'19'10" West, along the Easterly Boundary of said Tract 18, for a distance of 78.83 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northerly, whose radius point bears North 03'51'59" West, a distance of 4,390.18 feet therefrom; thence run Westerly, along the arc of ., said curve to the right, having a radius of 4,390.18 feet, through a central angle of 00'44'21 ", subtended by a chord of 56.64 feet at a bearing of South DAVID J. P.S. OR THE FIRM) 86'30'11" West, for an arc length of 56.64 feet to the end of said curve; FLA. LIC. N r,51�34 thence South 86'50'45" West, for a distance of 273.99 feet; thence North NOT VAUD OU E SIGNATURE AND 00'19'10" East, along he Westerly Boundary of said Tract 18, for a distance of THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF E FLORIDA 9 Y Y LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER 79.16 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.600 acres, more or less. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION VIA WILKISON 8c ASSOCIATES INC. W ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME I AS NOTED I GGE 23 1 0014.1 1 EAW 100- 018— OOO.DWG DATE 09/01 ro /3 /o l SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 1 OF 1 1 1 DJH DWG. NO IR —L -170 J r PR 2G4. L F-41 EX HOT :ot IEEE SI]�RPLF INTEREST Pa'p 1aE N ROAD R= 5334.452- I M M OKALEE _ _ ---- -- t=�3� • 51 Tan = 165.81 POINT OF BEGINNING: S.R• 846 A= 3'33'38" OR PARCEL 171 R= 4390.18 L= 332.12 Tan = 166.14 0=- 4'20'04" 0 50 100 200 � M 35 r- Notes: W ° ELVIN TORRES ``' 1. This is not a survey. P ASCU AL TORRES 0 3317 T 2. Basis of bearing is plat. o O.R. 2395, PG o 0 z Z 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. N 89'40'50" W 330.00' Description: 4. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. A portion of Tract 35, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 7, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwesterly Corner of said Tract 35, said point being the beginning of a curve, concave Northerly, having a radius of 5,334.46 feet and a central angle of 03'33'38 "; thence run Easterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 5,334.46 feet, through a central angle of 03'33'38 ", subtended by a chord of 331.45 feet at a bearing of North 84'56'58" East, for an arc length of 331.51 feet to the end of said curve, and the Northeasterly Corner of said Tract 35; thence South 00'19'10" West, along the Easterly Boundary of said Tract 35, for a distance of 73.11 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northerly, whose radius point bears North 08"12'03" West, a distance of 4,390.18 feet therefrom; thence run Westerly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 4,390.18 feet, through a central angle of 04'20'04", subtended by a chord of 332.04 feet at a bearing of South 83'57'59" West, for an arc length of 332.12 feet to the end of said curve; thence North 00'19'10" East, along the Westerly Boundary of said Tract 35, DAVID J. H A P. FOR THE FIRM) FLA. for a distance of 78.83 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing g OT AL WITH IOU NOT VALID NATHOU THE SIGNATURE AND 0.578 acres, more or less. THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR,,-AND ,MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION \ALA WILKISON & ASSOCIATES INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I GGE 23 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE 09/01 I d(31o/ SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 1 OF 1 1 I DJH DWG. NO. IR —L -171 J r paq�n �- -- MMOK ALES 60 AO ti � a 84 P Afe - C`zL 1 -1 Z FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 10 N 89'40'50" W 330.00' DESCRIPTION: Tract 36 of Golden Gate Estates Unit 23 as recorded in Plat Book 7 at Page 9 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Containing 3.790 acres more or less. SCALE I SEC 19 66?!%iiii 0 50 100 200 Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. DAVID J. Y P. ,M." THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. N 5834 NOT VALID NATHO E SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAI ED SEAL OF A FLORID/ LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION LKISON "C VIAA:S'SOCIAT S INC. E W ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SUB W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I GGE 23 0014.1 1 EAW 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG CHECKED BYJ DWG. N0. 10/01 1 OF 1 DJH I IR —L -172 J r �t i� rn (D J 0 0) O .. E 42A7 A B R= � 3 `;289 44 63„ 103.55' 42 PA2CIf C ►-:�3 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST Y N Q �U0 a- U r� LL J N z <� aQ -i o' C5 �—N86*51'39"E 325.30'* _N86_ 511E 196.1 •d' r CO n O 0 I O Z 40' w I� W Z W ca O P.O.B. o 129.14'* S86'51'39" R 0 MOKPLE %46 �� 1M 5•R, a N � � Z 15234 46 R 413 g0 L' 07.06 r EXHW paw OE N� DAVID J. ATT, . . (FOR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. NO. 5 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISoN & %%%IASSOCIATES INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB W. 0. N0. DRAWN BY I FILE NAME 0 50 100 150 AS NOTED GGE 22 1 0014.1 1 EAW I 00- 018- OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG I CHECKED BYI DWG. NO. 10/01 1 OF 2 DJH IR -L -173 -1 J r P/01- e-cq L. I � 3 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST Description: 10E A portion of the County Canal R.O.W., Golden Gate Estates, Unit 22, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 84 , Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southwesterly Corner of Tract 93, of said Unit 22; thence North 86'51'39" East, along the Southerly Boundary of said Tract 93, for a distance of 196.16 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described parcel; thence continuing North 86'51'39" East, along the Southerly Boundary of said Tract 93, for a distance of 129.14 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northerly, whose radius point bears North 14'21'24" West, a distance of 5,234.46 feet therefrom; thence run Westerly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 5,234.46 feet, through a central angle of 04'31'50 ", subtended by a chord of 413.79 feet at a bearing of South 77'54'30" West, for an arc length of 413.90 feet to the end of said curve; thence North 12'09'43" West, for a distance of 9.41 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northerly, whose radius point bears North 12'09'43" West, a distance of 4,217.18 feet therefrom; thence run Westerly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 4,217.18 feet, through a central angle of 03'55'42 ", subtended by a chord of 289.08 feet at a bearing of North 75'52'26" East, for an arc length of 289.13 feet to the end of said curve, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.140 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. Not valid without Sheet 1 of 2 depicting Sketch of Description and bearing the original signature and embossed seal of a Florida registered Surveyor and Mapper. 5. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. 6. * Note should be taken that on the plat of Golden Gate Estates, Unit 22, a 30' deficiency occurs in the block containing Tracts 110 -125, and Tract "A ", and a 30' overage occurs in the block containing 78 -109, and this is reflected in the calculations concerning this parcel. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISoN & ASSOCIATES I N C . III ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 W4 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME I AS NOTED I GGE 22 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE 10/01 107vtc SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 2 OF 2 1 1 DJH DWG. NO. IR —L -173 -2 J EXH r Paw—n: C r; N L0 w 0 0 O Pto Description: R% 3• MMOK p,1-EE RO 4 3� 55 ,s — , g46 3 �(I 7 '9'10" W Z,!�0 '5'.'6 x//_ jR�q'4059 L %301 g1.0� 53 13.55'36 MICHAEL S. COMBS O.R. 2348, PG. 2582 i i i i A portion of Tract 53, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 9 , Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: V in 0 O co W 0 t O O .. 5g0.1 0 09 X20• " C'3 'lf I W V) Lu Z Q o �w I 0 3 CO PA -I.CtL- I -:iL- FEE SIMPLE INTEREST ion 66?!%�6 0 50 100 200 Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. Beginning at the Northwesterly Corner of said Tract 53, said point being the beginning of a curve, concave Northerly, having a radius of 5,334.46 feet and a central angle of 03'37'55 "; thence run Easterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 5,334.46 feet, through a central angle of 03'37'55 ", subtended by a chord of 338.08 feet at a bearing of North 77'45'52" East, for an arc length of 338.14 feet to the end of said curve, and the Northeasterly Corner of said Tract 53; thence South 00'19'10" West, along the Easterly Boundary of said Tract 53, for a distance of 46.34 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northerly, whose radius point bears North 17'53'12" West, a distance of 4,390.18 feet therefrom; thence run Westerly, along the r arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of ' 4,390.18 feet, through a central angle of 00'31'24 ", subtended by a chord of 40.09 feet at a bearing of DAVID J. "HYA T P.S.M.- THE FIRM) South 72'22'30" West, for an arc length of 40.09 feet FLA. LIC. NO. 34 to the end of said curve; thence South 00'19'10" West, NOT VALID N OUT SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA a distance of 15.67 feet, to a point on a circular curve, LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER concave Northerly, whose radius point bears North 17.18'15" West, a distance of 4,405.18 feet therefrom; SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION thence run Westerly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 4,405.18 feet, through a central W I LK I S O N 8C angle of 03'55'36 ", subtended by a chord of 301.83 feet VJAAT S S O C 1 A E S at a bearing of South 74'39'33" West, for an arc length INC. = of 301.89 feet to the end of said curve; thence North ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 00'19'10" East, along the Westerly Boundary of said 350 EXCHAN 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 NAPLES, LA. 3 Tract 53, for a distance of 78.01 feet, to the POINT OF ( 643-2404 FAX N0. 173 BEGINNING; Containing 0.519 acres, more or less. FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. L85770 SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I GGE 23 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE 09/01 ia13001 SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 1 OF 1 1 1 DJH DWG. NO. IR —L -174 J r pAI?c 'i L- 1 -35c FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 25TH AVENUE N.W. 60' ROAD EASEMENT N 89'40'50" W 330.00' L _ cV O r w O OI O O zl 66!!%�6 0 50 100 150 N 84'35'11' E 331.66' 13.10' S 86'50' 45" W 330.61' PPRCE` 175C P.O.B. ROAD - MMOKA�EE -- S R g46 DAVID J. AV, ^ .M. ,(FOR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. ft. 4 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON 8c ASSOCIATES INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB I W.O. N0. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I GGE 22 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018- OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG I CHECKED BYJ DWG. NO. 02/02 1 OF 2 1 DJH I IR- L- 175C -1 p- m O cn CU z bi (n fy_ N o W � ::1 7- M ;- O W M J J J U W z I I Q W I W co � In 0 W J Q W I z o f WQU� .- Lu O Q' U � W o Q O Cn m D I� IN I 66!!%�6 0 50 100 150 N 84'35'11' E 331.66' 13.10' S 86'50' 45" W 330.61' PPRCE` 175C P.O.B. ROAD - MMOKA�EE -- S R g46 DAVID J. AV, ^ .M. ,(FOR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. ft. 4 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON 8c ASSOCIATES INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB I W.O. N0. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I GGE 22 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018- OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG I CHECKED BYJ DWG. NO. 02/02 1 OF 2 1 DJH I IR- L- 175C -1 p- r FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 0' 12 C i L vq- -C_ Description: EXH BM. Pew—a-a A portion of Tract 63, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 22, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 84, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeasterly Corner of said Tract 63; thence South 86'50'45" West, along the Southerly Boundary of said Tract 63, for a distance of 330.61 feet, to the Southwesterly Corner of said Tract 63, thence North 84'35'11" East, for a distance of 331.66 feet, to a point of intersection with the Easterly Boundary of said Tract 63; thence South 00'19'10" West, along said Easterly Boundary, for a distance of 13.10 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.050 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. Not valid without Sheet 1 of 2 depicting Sketch of Description and bearing the original signature and embossed seal of a Florida registered Surveyor and Mapper. 5. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. 6. Note should be taken that all measurements shown on this description are per plat, and this is reflected in the calculations concerning this parcel. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION %%RI:A I LKISoN 8c SSOCIATES INC. ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I GGE 22 1 0014.1 1 EAW 100- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET 02/02 2 OF 2 FB PG I CHECKED BY DJH DWG. NO IR— L- 175C -2 J r■ pA 2.C, t L� t -4 5r6 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 25TH AVENUE N.W. 60' ROAD EASEMENT N 89'38'26" W 337.58'* I 30' Cy, z w w w V) a I °I LLJ o o 0 0' Z 0 I N 86'51 39 E EXHIBIT-L 150 0 IMM _- S.R 846 DAVID J. H T, P. . (FOR 1�?E rIR1) FLA. LIC. N 53 NOT VALID WITH 1T. THE ;nt;N."TURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED ;EIAL''OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISoN Sc ASSOCIATES INC. W ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB W. 0. N0. DRAWN BY FILE NAME AS NOTED GGE 22 0014.1 EAW 00- 018- OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. NO. 02/02 1 OF 2 DJH IR- L- 1756 -1 J r PA2(-!�-L, 1 -3 5)5 EX N FEE SIMPLE INTEREST �� l0E Description: A portion of Tract 92, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 22, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 84, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southeasterly Corner of said Tract 92; thence South 86'51'39" West, along the Southerly Boundary of said Tract 92, for a distance of 338.20 feet, to the Southwesterly Corner of said Tract 92, thence North 00'19'10" East, along the Westerly Boundary of said Tract 92, and the Centerline of the 60.00' wide Road Easement (2nd Street N.E.); for a distance of 13.10 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northerly, whose radius point bears North 08'50'20" West, a distance of 4,117.18 feet therefrom; thence run Easterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 4,117.18 feet, through a central angle of 04'47'48 ", subtended by a chord of 344.57 feet at a bearing of North 78'45'47" East, for an arc length of 344.67 feet to the end of said curve, and a point of intersection with the Easterly Boundary of said Tract 92; thence South 00'19'10" West, along said Easterly Boundary, for a distance of 61.73 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.271 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. Not valid without Sheet 1 of 2 depicting Sketch of Description and bearing the original signature and embossed seal of a Florida registered Surveyor and Mapper. 5. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. 6. * Note should be taken that on the plat of Golden Gate Estates, Unit 22, a 30' deficiency occurs in the block containing Tracts 110 -125, and Tract "A ", and a 30' overage occurs in the block containing 78 -109, and this is reflected in the calculations concerning this parcel. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION \ALA WILKISON & ASSOCIATES INC. IIIIIIIN ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX N0. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 ld J r PAR (- tU lg5A FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 25TH AVENUE N.W. N 89'38'26" W 337.58* 60'WIDE ROAD EASEMENT i� n rn Eo W 0 rn 0 O Z w 0) 0 0 cn Y n Cr y N Q D_ �U) (-n � U � ¢ N Z < Q J o � Q O A�5 w O rn O I O Z 40' I ~ W I LEI IW IZ I� w L6 00 °o r EXHIBIT � 9 r7 IL[4 �2•p8 p4 Soo 119,1v Zf�� 523A °`6 Z N 86'51 39" E 325.30'* 32 665„ ).Q. _ �/ , oK P�E� 'o 846 -/ E 66!!%�6 0 50 100 150 ff DAVID J. H TT, .M. (FOR THE FIRM) FLA. LI C. 5W NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON "C ASSOCIATS E VIR INC. = ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB W. 0. NO. DRAWN BY FILE NAME AS NOTED GGE 22 0014.1 EAW 00- 018- OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. NO. REVISED 01/31/02 02/02 1 OF 2 DJH IR- L- 175A -1 ff r FEE SIMPLE INTEREST PA2Cit L- I ?!�-A Description: EXHBM P a W I T—T A portion of Tract 93, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 22, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 84, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwesterly Corner of said Tract 93, thence North 00'19'10" East, along the Westerly Boundary of said Tract 93, for a distance of 61.73 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northerly, whose radius point bears North 13'38'07" West, a distance of 4,117.18 feet therefrom; thence run Easterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 4,117.18 feet, through a central angle of 04'18'42 ", subtended by a chord of 309.75 feet at a bearing of North 74'12'32" East, for an arc length of 309.83 feet to the end of said curve, and a point of intersection with the Westerly Boundary of the 80.00 foot wide Drainage Easement, as shown on the Plat of Said Unit 22; thence South 00'19'10" West, along said Westerly Line, for a distance of 105.17 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northerly, whose radius point bears North 17'29'57" West, a distance of 4,217.18 feet therefrom; thence run Easterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 4,217.18 feet, through a central angle of 00'34'18 ", subtended by a chord of 42.08 feet at a bearing of North 72'12'54" East, for an arc length of 42.08 feet to the end of said curve, and to an intersection of the Easterly Boundary of said Tract 93; thence South 00'19'10" West, along said Easterly Boundary Line of Said Tract 93, for a distance of 32.57 feet, to the beginning of a curve, concave Northerly, having a radius of 5,234.46 feet and a central angle of 00'08'45 "; thence run Westerly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 5,234.46 feet, through a central angle of 00'08'45 ", subtended by a chord of 13.32 feet at a bearing of South 75'34'13" West, for an arc length of 13.32 feet to the end of said curve; thence South 86'51'39" West, along the Southerly Boundary of said Tract 93, for a distance of 325.30 feet; to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.667 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. Not valid without Sheet 1 of 2 depicting Sketch of Description and bearing the original signature and embossed seal of a Florida registered Surveyor and Mapper. 5. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. 6. * Note should be taken that on the plat of Golden Gate Estates, Unit 22, a 30' deficiency occurs in the block containing Tracts 110 -125, and Tract "A ", and a 30' overage occurs in the block containing 78 -109, and this is reflected in the calculations concerning this parcel. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION SAK/' WILKISON & ASSOCIATES WW INC. = ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY FILE NAME AS NOTED I GGE 22 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE I SHEET REVISED 01/31/021 0202 I 2 OF 2 FB PG I CHECKED BY DJH DWG. N0. IR— L- 175A -2 J EX -.jL r P900�5B�ff-h PA(Z C4 L 1 `4 to FEE SIMPLE INTEREST ' Rp pD R•29�e53 i k8 �f99• 83 `MMpK 8.5364 �onf4931" /RANDALL BOULEVARD S R • 8n'6 ton0 46.8," �, 51, ^ — — M 0 co U.1 0 f o 0 II 5 F-- 00 Z LO O j N UC (yZ C3 Lu n _Ja OW O N �J OL'- U p Q n N 10E 0 50 100 200 Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. A portion of the west one —half of Tract 54, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 9, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwesterly Corner of Tract 54, said point being the beginning of a curve, concave Northerly, having a radius of 5,334.46 feet and a central angle of 00'46'10 "; thence run Easterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 5,334.46 feet, through a central angle of 00'46'10 ", subtended by a chord of 71.64 feet at a bearing of North 75'33'50" East, for an arc length of 71.64 feet to a point of compound curvature with a curve, concave Northerly; thence run Easterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 2,914.93 feet, through a central angle of 01'57'31 ", subtended by a chord of 99.64 feet at a bearing of North 74'11'59" East, for an arc length of 99.65 feet to the end of said curve, and the Northeasterly Corner of the West One —half of Tract 54; thence South 00'19'10" West, along the Easterly Boundary of the West One —half Tract 54, for a distance of 37.54 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northerly, whose radius point bears North 17'06'01" West, a distance of 4,390.18 feet therefrom; thence run Westerly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 4,390.18 feet, through a central angle of 02'16'21 ", subtended by a chord of 174.12 feet at a bearing of South 71'45'48" West, for an arc length of 174.13 feet to the end of said curve; thence North 00'19'10" East, along the Westerly Boundary of said Tract 54, for a distance of 46.92 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.159 acres, more or less. G AVID J. HYATf, S. OR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. N0. 834 NOT VALID WITHO THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON & ASSOCIATES WW INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE N0, LB5770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I GGE 23 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE 10/01 111401 SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 1 OF 1 1 I DJH DWG. N0. IR —L -176 J 90 �8 Rf X14 X308 Zod812• n h6 1 �2 I I o z 1 TR 5 00 0 w 2 0 UJ �, J C/) N o, Q 1 o I W o' z w Q1 U co YD N 3 W n Ow U� O 1 8.00J- I -- m Description: M 0 co U.1 0 f o 0 II 5 F-- 00 Z LO O j N UC (yZ C3 Lu n _Ja OW O N �J OL'- U p Q n N 10E 0 50 100 200 Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. A portion of the west one —half of Tract 54, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 9, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwesterly Corner of Tract 54, said point being the beginning of a curve, concave Northerly, having a radius of 5,334.46 feet and a central angle of 00'46'10 "; thence run Easterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 5,334.46 feet, through a central angle of 00'46'10 ", subtended by a chord of 71.64 feet at a bearing of North 75'33'50" East, for an arc length of 71.64 feet to a point of compound curvature with a curve, concave Northerly; thence run Easterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 2,914.93 feet, through a central angle of 01'57'31 ", subtended by a chord of 99.64 feet at a bearing of North 74'11'59" East, for an arc length of 99.65 feet to the end of said curve, and the Northeasterly Corner of the West One —half of Tract 54; thence South 00'19'10" West, along the Easterly Boundary of the West One —half Tract 54, for a distance of 37.54 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northerly, whose radius point bears North 17'06'01" West, a distance of 4,390.18 feet therefrom; thence run Westerly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 4,390.18 feet, through a central angle of 02'16'21 ", subtended by a chord of 174.12 feet at a bearing of South 71'45'48" West, for an arc length of 174.13 feet to the end of said curve; thence North 00'19'10" East, along the Westerly Boundary of said Tract 54, for a distance of 46.92 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.159 acres, more or less. G AVID J. HYATf, S. OR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. N0. 834 NOT VALID WITHO THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON & ASSOCIATES WW INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE N0, LB5770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I GGE 23 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE 10/01 111401 SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 1 OF 1 1 I DJH DWG. N0. IR —L -176 J VT I I I I r I O O 0 40' I� w I U I� I Iw EXHOT A pq•_ug—d FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 60' WIDE ROAD EASEMENT 25TH AVENUE N . W. N 89'37'56" W 337.59'* N 89'37'56" W �PG� U-) W O T 94 0) MOHAMMED M. RAHMAN 00 FAHMIDA RAHMAN Z O.R. 2479, PG. 533 k,x 51 18 z Q .- :2zl� Q0 N fY 2 Q C� x a- 0 < r�'i w�Ln � = N = LL- Cr- 0 p m 337.59'* �I in �I of 30'-- LLJ ILq I o Iz I— a'I Lv 000 I � z 07 I= I� L2 I y I V /rn R'g149521 / o I � �� •1 �' Og PRGEL 28� � R slb� 6, / I 00 RANDALL BOULEVARD P.O.B. LINE TABLE L1 51.57' r N 30'20'21" E L2 1 31.69' 1 N 71'31'20" E NOT TO SCALE DAVID J. HY4ft, P.S .FOR THE FIRM) FLA. LI C. NO' . 583 NOT VALID WITHO THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION V I A WILKISON & ASSOCIATES INC. = ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB I W.O. N0. I DRAWN BY FILE NAME AS NOTED I GGE 22 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018- OOO.DWG DATE I SHEET FB PG I CHECKED BY DWG. N0. 10/01 1 OF 2 DJH IR -L -177 -1 In 3TO EX FEE SIMPLE INTEREST Pew do gft PE Parcel I ��- � Description: A portion of Tract 94 and 95, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 22, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 84, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwesterly Corner of said Tract 94; thence North 00'19'10" East, along the Westerly Boundary of said Tract 94, which is also the centerline of a 80' wide drainage easement, for a distance of 64.72 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northwesterly, whose radius point bears North 18'18'49" West, a distance of 4,187.18 feet therefrom; thence run Northeasterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 4,187.18 feet, through a central angle of 9'14'09 ", subtended by a chord of 674.22 feet at a bearing of North 67'04'07" East, for an arc length of 674.95 feet to the end of said curve; thence North 30'20'21" East, for a distance of 51.57 feet; thence North 71'31'20" East, for a distance of 31.69 feet; thence South 00'19'10" West, along the Easterly Boundary of said Tract 95, which is also the centerline of 4th Street N.E., for a distance of 112.94 feet, to the Southeasterly Corner of said Tract 95 and to a point on a circular curve, concave Northerly, whose radius point bears North 29'06'20" West, a distance of 2,814.93 feet therefrom; thence run Westerly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 2,814.93 feet, through a central angle of 14'17'53 ", subtended by a chord of 700.64 feet at a bearing of South 68'02'36" West, for an arc length of 702.46 feet to a point of compound curvature with a curve, concave Northerly; thence run Westerly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 5,234.46 feet, through a central angle of 00'18'18 ", subtended by a chord of 27.86 feet at a bearing of South 75'20'35" West, for an arc length of 27.86 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 1.297 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. Not valid without Sheet 1 of 2 depicting Sketch of Description and bearing the original signature and embossed seal of a Florida registered Surveyor and Mapper. 5. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. 6. * Note should be taken that on the plat of Golden Gate Estates, Unit 22, a 30' deficiency occurs in the block containing Tracts 110 -125, and Tract "A", and a 30' overage occurs in the block containing 78 -109, and this is reflected in the calculations concerning this parcel. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION %AA WILKISON & ASSOCIATES INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. L85770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I GGE 22 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE I SHEET 10/01 1 2 OF 2 FB PG I CHECKED BY DJH DWG. NO IR —L -177 -2 J i- �� RO Pj Raz9 8 �M �2 S i I- I TRA PAGE. 54 o Qco 0 C N o I W�a- F— W O U aJ Y0 04 3 ry �— W O C3 m Description: L 1'i $ s�36616 R >> 15 PAGE. �1� 56 S00'19'10" W 25.61 M 0 W 0 0 0 z 54 h— 00 Z LO O N ULj ry W a_ JQ OE O U LO L J N � O L`- U p a_ PAIZC'� t_ 1-49 , FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 0 E -'RANDALL BOULEVARD '40'50" E 17.51' CENTERLINE ROADWAY EASEMENT LINE 66?!%i6 0 50 100 200 0 ° Notes: 0 W 1. This is not a survey. 0 2. Basis of bearing is plat. in 0 3. Subject to easements, z reservations and restrictions of record. 4. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. A portion of the Easterly One —half of Tract 54, Golden Gate Estates, Unit 23, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 9, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest Corner of said Easterly One —half of Tract 54, said point being the beginning of a curve, concave Northerly, having a radius of 2,914.93 feet and a central angle of 02'06'00 "; thence run Easterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 2,914.93 feet, through a central angle of 02'06'00 ", subtended by a chord of 106.83 feet at a bearing of North 72'10'14" East, for an arc length of 106.84 feet to the end of said curve, and the centerline of Randall Boulevard; thence South 89'40'50" East, along the Centerline of Randall Boulevard, for a distance of 17.51 feet, to a point on a circular curve, concave Northerly, whose radius point bears North 20'27'53" West, a distance of 4,356.18 feet therefrom; thence run Westerly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 4,366.18 feet, through a central angle of 01'27'31 ", subtended by a chord of 111.14 feet at a bearing of South 68'48'22" West, for an arc length of 111.14 feet to the end of said curve; thence South 00'19'10" East, a distance of 25.61 feet, to a point on a circular curve, concave Northerly, whose radius point bears North 20'09'31" West, a distance of 4,390.18 feet therefrom; thence run Westerly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 4,390.18 feet, through a central angle of 00'11'21 ", subtended by a chord of 14.50 feet at a bearing of South 69'44'48" West, for an arc length of 14.50 feet to the end of said curve; thence North 0019'10" East, along the Westerly Boundary of the Easterly One —half of Tract 54, for a distance of 37.54 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.030 acres, more or less. c DAVID J. HY '.S.'. R THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. N $8S NOT VALID WITH E SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON & ASSOCIATES WW INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME I AS NOTED I GGE 23 1 0014.1 1 EAW 100- 018— OOO.DWG DATE 10/01 10111/o/ SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 1 OF 1 1 1 DJH DWG. NO. IR —L -178 J r EXHIEUT. A .., Pese__►2_oi_.�,Z_, FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 1 � 7 1 � 1 I �I I I 1 1 � 1 I i' f lI III f r 1 I�I � f fr j �II 1 PARCEL 178A W I �S f r 1 ' j N C2 I Or f U 0. f In � .I� � o I � I % , 1 / Gaj 1 wI Z, JI O F U I ---I 1 ORANGETREE BOULEVARD N � R -L10 9 I ij SECTION 22 -48 -27 L4-' C1 L3 2 RANDA LL BOULEVARD – –- _ _ -- – EA-SME vr _ _ — _- _ - _- SECTION - _ - _ LINE NI �VI 1 rl 'w 11 NOT TO SCALE L1 .—RIGHT OF WAY LINE DAVID J. HY ,, P.S.M. FOR THE FIRM) . FLA. LIC. N 5834 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON & ASSOCIATES W INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME I AS NOTED 122/48/271 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018- OOO.DWG DATE REVISED 2/18/02 1001 REVISED 2/13/02 / SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 1 OF 3 1 I DJH DWG. NO. IR- L- 178A -1 J 1 ' 1 III '�I 1 1 rANWM��' *A W% me= I ij SECTION 22 -48 -27 L4-' C1 L3 2 RANDA LL BOULEVARD – –- _ _ -- – EA-SME vr _ _ — _- _ - _- SECTION - _ - _ LINE NI �VI 1 rl 'w 11 NOT TO SCALE L1 .—RIGHT OF WAY LINE DAVID J. HY ,, P.S.M. FOR THE FIRM) . FLA. LIC. N 5834 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON & ASSOCIATES W INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME I AS NOTED 122/48/271 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018- OOO.DWG DATE REVISED 2/18/02 1001 REVISED 2/13/02 / SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 1 OF 3 1 I DJH DWG. NO. IR- L- 178A -1 J r EXHINT� POW-12.0 8 11 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING L1 11.83 S00'00'02 "W L2 1241.60 N88'09'11 "W L3 28.12 N01'49'05 "E L4 21.21 N27'57'55 "W L5 19.57 N27'57'55 "W L6 20.85 N45'39'1 6 "E L7 238.27 N00'00'02 "E L8 25.00 S89'59'58 "E L9 282.89 S00'00'02 "W L10 10.18 N89.22'29 "W L11 10.00 S78'36'59 "E CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS DELTA ARC LENGTH CHORD BEARING CHORD C1 242.00 60'13'02" 254.34 N58'04'22 "W 242.79 C2 2914.93 60'58'06" 3101.77 N30'29'05 "E 2957.49 C3 40.00 1 49'27'30" 34.53 N24'43'47 "E 33.47 C4 2947.79 10'45'30" 553.50 S06'00'13 "W 552.69 C5 2957.79 50'05'09" 1 2585.59 1 S36'25'36 "W 2504.05 Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. Not valid without Sheet 1 of 3 depicting Sketch of Description and bearing the original signature and embossed seal of a Florida registered Surveyor and Mapper. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION %%%:A'SS0C1AT LKISoN "C S INC. E M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB W. 0. NO. DRAWN BY FILE NAME AS NOTED 22/48/27 0014.1 EAW 00- 018- OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. N0. REVISED 2/18/02 10/01 2 OF 3 DJH IR- L- 178A -2 REVISED 2/13/02 J r FEE SIMPLE INTEREST Description: EXHIBIT o E A portion of Section 22, and Section 23, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeast Corner of said Section 22; thence South 00'00'02" West, along the Easterly Line of Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, for a distance of 11.83 feet, to a point on the Northerly Right of Way Line of Randall Boulevard; thence North 88'09'11" West, along said Northerly Right of Way Line, for a distance of 1,241.60 feet; thence North 01'49'05" East, for a distance of 28.12 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northeasterly, whose radius point bears North 01'49'11" East, a distance of 242.00 feet therefrom; thence run Northwesterly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 242.00 feet, through a central angle of 60'13'02 ", subtended by a chord of 242.79 feet at a bearing of North 58'04'22" West, for an arc length of 254.34 feet to the end of said curve; thence North 27'57'55" West, for a distance of 21.21 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described parcel; thence continuing North 27'57'55" West, for a distance of 19.57 feet; thence North 45'39'16" East, for a distance of 20.85 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northwesterly, whose radius point bears North 29'01'52" West, a distance of 2,914.93 feet therefrom; thence run Northeasterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 2,914.93 feet, through a central angle of 60'58'06 ", subtended by a chord of 2,957.49 feet at a bearing of North 30'29'05" East, for an arc length of 3,101.77 feet to the end of said curve; thence North 00'00'02" East, for a distance of 238.27 feet, to the southerly Right of Way Line of Orangetree Boulevard; thence South 89'59'58" East, for a distance of 25.00 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Southeasterly, whose radius point bears South 89'59'58" East, a distance of 40.00 feet therefrom; thence run Northeasterly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 40.00 feet, through a central angle of 49'27'30 ", subtended by a chord of 33.47 feet at a bearing of North 24'43'47" East, for an arc length of 34.53 feet to the end of said curve; thence South 00'00'02" West, for a distance of 282.89 feet; thence North 89'22'29" West, for a distance of 10.18 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Westerly, whose radius point bears North 89'22'32" West, a distance of 2,947.79 feet therefrom; thence run Southerly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 2,947.79 feet, through a central angle of 10'45'30 ", subtended by a chord of 552.69 feet at a bearing of South 06'00'13" West, for an arc length of 553.50 feet to the end of said curve; thence South 78'36'59" East, for a distance of 10.00 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northwesterly, whose radius point bears North 78'36'59" West, a distance of 2,957.79 feet therefrom; thence run Southwesterly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 2,957.79 feet, through a central angle of 50'05'09 ", subtended by a chord of 2,504.05 feet at a bearing of South 36'25'36" West, for an arc length of 2,585.59 feet to the end of said curve; and the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 2.315 acres, more or less. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON "C ASSOCIATES INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED 122/48/271 0014.1 1 EAW 100- 018— OOO.DWG DATE REVISED 2/18/021 10/01 REVISED 2/13/02 / SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 3 OF 3 I I DJH DWG. NO. IR— L- 178A -3 J 0 0 W 00 W J Q Y ui �I FEE SIMPLE INTEREST O r S 9' 3'88 "E / THE LAND DESCRIBED IN — �1iM'i / O.R. BOOK 2229, PAGE 1043 I I I `" I- 0 00 w N O 0 tP ,O Z 13: I0 Lo CN 1 1) I IR= 12184.67 L =93.04 Tan =46.52 A= 00'26' 15" P ARGEL A-188 wN PARCEL 1 ORANGETREE UNIT THREE IN89*53'08"W I 10.00 N O I 3I N I O O O O IO I Li I �i Lo N I I I N69' 3'CI8 "W 14. 0' U 0 z� _n (n N W ___I O 0_ n Z� 0 L Cr- nr; C� O 0 50 100 150 I JWPI DAVID J. TT,° . (FOR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. 0. 5 ,4 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WI LKI S ON & ASSOCIATES INC. N ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. L85770 SCALE SEC /SUB W. 0. N0. DRAWN BY FILE NAME AS NOTED OT3 0014.1 EAW 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. NO. 10/01 1 OF 2 DJH IR— L- 178B -1 1013101 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST pA2CCCL I�g-6 Description: wX.i A portion of Parcel 1, Orangetree Unit Three, Citrus Green Section, Phase 1 —A according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 14, Page 121, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwesterly Corner of said Parcel 1; thence North 00'00'02" East, for a distance of 804.95 feet, to the Southwesterly Corner of the lands described in Official Records Book 2229, Page 1043, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence South 89'53'08" East, along the Southerly Boundary of said lands described, for a distance of 14.36 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Easterly, whose radius point bears South 89'33'43" East, a distance of 12,184.67 feet therefrom; thence run Southerly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 12,184.67 feet, through a central angle of 00'26'15 ", subtended by a chord of 93.04 feet at a bearing of South 00'13'10" West, for an arc length of 93.04 feet to the end of said curve; thence South 00'00'02" West, for a distance of 241.63 feet; thence North 89'53'08" West, for a distance of 10.00 feet; thence South 00'00'02" West, for a distance of 470.25 feet; thence North 89'53'08" West, along the Southerly Boundary of said Parcel 1, for a distance of 4.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.151 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. Not valid without Sheet 1 of 2 depicting Sketch of Description and bearing the original signature and embossed seal of a Florida registered Surveyor and Mapper. 5. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION MAWILKISoN & ASSOCIATES MIIIIIIIIIIIIII� INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I OT3 1 0014.1 1 EAW 100- 018— OOO.DWG DATE 10/01 Ib(26 bl SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 2 OF 2 1 1 DJH DWG. NO. IR— L- 17813-2 4 � I II I I I II J, i� Ih7 I00 I IN Iw 'Io rrn 'o 10 'Z i I� Lq Z F- M �W W 1(A I I �I l I I Im og EX�} FEE SIMPLE INTEREST OPrfZCtL I'::)`l <jd . I u 4 S 89'40'50" E 1431.09'* I N I ' I I I i I I I J I INOT TO SCALE rn / �o I Z N i Q O U d (L / � w Co Q /' Q/ i Vry � L2 i P.O.B. RANDALL CURVE TABLE CURVE LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING DELTA ARC LENGTH L1 761.88 N00'19'10 "E CHORD C1 L2 426.54 S89'1 0'40-E .' 2284.18 L3 381.14 S00'19'10 "W L4 1 50.10 1 S89'40'50 "W i P.O.B. RANDALL CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS DELTA ARC LENGTH CHORD BEARING CHORD C1 2769.79 47'15'01" 2284.18 N25'47'03 "E 2220.00 C2* 2943.18 56'20'57" 2894.55 S31'18'41 "W 2779.30 100' ROAD EASEMENT SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION D VID J. HY ,' P. {FOR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. NO 5834 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER WILKISON & ASSOCIATES INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 I SCALE 1 SEC /SUB W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I GGE 22 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018- OOO.DWG DATE 10/01 fo(31 /o/ SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 1 OF 2 1 I DJH DWG. NO. IR -L -179 -1 J r EX FEE SIMPLE INTEREST R Description: PA P- (cc, L 119 A portion of Tract "A ", Golden Gate Estates, Unit 22, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 84, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwesterly Corner of said Tract "A "; thence North 00'19'10" East, along the westerly boundary of said Tract "A ", which is also the centerline of 4th Street N.E., for a distance of 761.88 feet; thence South 89'10'40" East, for a distance of 426.54 feet; thence South 00'19'10" West, a distance of 381.14 feet, to a point on a circular curve, concave Northwesterly, whose radius point bears North 40'35'26" West, a distance of 2,769.79 feet therefrom; thence run Northeasterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 2,769.79 feet, through a central angle of 47'15'01 ", subtended by a chord of 2,220.00 feet at a bearing of North 25'47'03" East, for an arc length of 2,284.18 feet to the end of said curve, and a point on the Northerly Boundary of said Tract "A "; thence South 89'40'50" East, along the Northerly Boundary of said Tract "A ", for a distance of 50.10 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northwesterly, whose radius point bears North 86'51'47" West, a distance of 2,943.18 feet therefrom; thence run Southwesterly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 2,943.18 feet, through a central angle of 56'20'57 ", subtended by a chord of 2,779.30 feet at a bearing of South 31'18'41" West, for an arc length of 2,894.55 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 9.513 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. Not valid without Sheet 1 of 2 depicting Sketch of Description and bearing the original signature and embossed seal of a Florida registered Surveyor and Mapper. 5. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. 6. * Note should be taken that on the plat of Golden Gate Estates, Unit 22, a 30' deficiency occurs in the block containing Tracts 110 -125, and Tract "A ", and a 30' overage occurs in the block containing 78 -109, and this is reflected in the calculations concerning this parcel. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION SAA WILKISON & ASSOCIATES W INC. I• ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 ALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I GGE 22 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG I CHECKED BY DWG. N0. 10/01 2 OF 2 DJH IR —L -179 -2 J 0A(U?,L, 1$D FEE SIMPLE INTEREST EXHBT _.QA 1 n� N 00'19'10" E 330.00' 3mg0ig' 5 AO 5�AOD0W '9D 0 m n c ' O O 0 ca tp m m tC m m N J 03. A S rtty NfD 0cmN 0 0= .p A A25 0 O C(O a O 3O DO 0� So ° 0 = 0 m m N z ° 0 , tm m A cn a V O O i. 5 �zo< o �oLu —I 2ozx rtO S ° O m -n /\ p _ O it * ,1 A `O O m M OO �, Ort m �G - J O A m ; n >z 0 < Z :3 O o ° m 3 � rtO) m m w 0 ca rt ,i DD � wZZ v-Icn. jZC7lm -0 o op .p a I, o L4 (n Ip O 0 Z "T j p W 7 7 j' 0 A 7 00 f O_ p rt t0 0— N 0 00 c Z (W _ 40 S p O. m ,... � = 0 UZ) 'P t0 O 1 m m 0 � O p � <�D O = � p N r � O.n O Q C OO n O 0 0 C 00 0 ' - �C a!s a:-0 o.4 BUD m 3 Wm �O � m O � - L4 0 U O ca � -0 O p O to 50 n OJD frtD A A m7 O z 0 rt 0 <D Q n m OD 0 C (A C 00 c0 O C .. rt 0 .+ f(D O .+ ? .+ � ca --h j 3 N 7 A Q' m 3 a rt Z O atAZ�m oo � Art l to � OD COS °-° -p:° ° 6,+3 < 3- 46 p-P: m y s ao c° �-. m 00 0° o ZOm C a)C SN m n Ln CD' ,+ K O. °? A+m 0 O s OO O a A IMD (. = -'I m O 7' N 0 d rt O �,�, (D p ~' 0 00 ° K m n t0 t0 O 0 7 O s 0 CT Z O (p O O (n 0 C 0 ca rt (O O GiO � 14 0�:, t0 rt O m W 3 =r ° 0 (D 0 to o- (A � o 0 0 ?� < y �.n A m _< y O m cr ..« 0o 7t0 O O m j -O^ Ve �m 7 rt m S wt0 0 rt0 �`` ° rr c �' _ OD °� W 0 o ANDY R. MORGAN J 0 ° -4 � N ° " O � n p L4 a W j o c 7(A a) AO BEVERLEY E. MORGAN O 0 o OtO n> ° t s 0, Cl. cl O.R. 1106, PG. 403 O v(O0 PO �zp N 01. 30'15" W 153.94' D o c0 •P c° cn PARCEL 180 \\O o 0 0 W o D Z m B; S 01-309-5"E 172.46' NSo O IMMOKALEE ROAD Nu O cn m O m N N m n c -s O -0 N ca O p C.PgZ- A ;' c m m N z ORA O <rn M nZ O O i. 5 �zo< o �oLu —I 2ozx " zoD� Le,,-. - /\ p _ O it * ,1 rr, Lq m M -0 ° ; n >z = m wZZ v-Icn. jZC7lm -0 o X N o L4 (n o c 00 O • O O O_ Oo I O O O G) m Z D m -n_(pz 846 m -s -1 0 (D W (D -0 N Dcl4xm D Z C.PgZ- O ;' c m m N �I/�� ORA 3 <rn M nZ O V1— /Ar i. 5 �zo< o �oLu —I 2ozx " zoD� Le,,-. - /\ p _ O it * ,1 rr, Lq O`er 0 -0 N to 4 �-N. >z 30 f)�o CD wZZ v-Icn. jZC7lm -0 o X N o L4 (n o c oso S.R. 846 -s -1 0 (D W (D -0 N Z ac 3 m ( <D rt 0 o 30 f)�o CD N o Q o c UZ) N m 0 <�D O cn O z 0 O N O O :3 -;b. -3 C4 CD N --` Z O IMMOKALEE ROAD o�oG �- O CD D r-I.- (n t7D '� m Q= Iox Q cn o n a- O� m rn�mC �aD< D�n� Q_ O CD �. -` c�x< V/� rri 3. 0 N. 0 m -' O h G) m co O O cr* O r+ m''cmnz n� z O �> tn; CD O r Q -, O Q Q _DO mw -� Z Z '� Q CD Q -1. N Cn I W Z vCl1 pZ�iTT 0 Cn Q CD Q O CD t0 C �m N Q CDCD A Z Dv N O Z) `< Q � C CD CD Q co CD CD co 0 co Q O r+ r+ 0' 0 CD co � Q c Q Q_ CD y r+ CD Q. m i[7 3 �aCnp y 'U o�� m O Q O -+ �� Z O QA -u 0 G Z7Q N t�0 y nA mo y j O p rtO Q N 7. O V co) fi ::3 C O tOO � rt-n �+ICD D NO -J+lLa N)0 co Q OD U) =, s 1 0 0 C- 00 o o 0 i . Z O 0 0 _ X m m m m v W c O O 0 0 r Op m I z z z O D O O m G) FEE SIMPLE INTEREST EX -DOE 11-1 C/ T- D J U I JU I O c IMMOKALEE ROAD o�oG �- - - S.R. 846 CD D Iox Z D o O� m rn�mC �aD< D�n� r-i* _� -` c�x< V/� rri m Zm�, c 0 -' G) m O En O m''cmnz n� z m �> tn; 0 O r m o m ? � C' _DO mw -� Z Z '� C omm m N Cn I W Z vCl1 pZ�iTT 3 r, -- A >oz v-1> Z CD 0 C- 00 o o 0 i . Z O 0 0 _ X m m m m v W c O O 0 0 r Op m I z z z O D O O m G) FEE SIMPLE INTEREST EX -DOE 11-1 C/ T- J U I JU I O c IMMOKALEE ROAD o�oG �- - - S.R. 846 awxm D Iox Z —�— -- rn�mC �aD< D�n� _� c�x< V/� rri C) Zm�, c M. > /\ cZn.. °� Q— O �Zv 'nZ�•� O m''cmnz n� z Z �> tn; . r o m ? � C' _DO mw -� Z Z '� omm O Cn I W Z vCl1 pZ�iTT 3 r, -- A >oz v-1> Z . 1"1 OC+�Cp'�,f,>� V/ m Q O �m A Z Dv N O O I I I I I I I I Q I O I n p I I i n N � 1 J I I I J N JN -0 I I LLJ LLJ Y I I � I I I I I Q 3 d- 0 I� I� N ao � I I I I I I PAAC-iL 192- FEE SIMPLE INTEREST I T 4.00' I I I I I I LLJ LLJ Z UJ I I WZ ZFLO Z W I p a N ro 51 o I ~a O N �I I Go a LLJ of IW I W Ix LLJ r7 Z N N I °° I 0 �o 3 � n�o I o I I U I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I � f'r I I — -f- 10' U.E— J N1Q€ NOT TO SCALE Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. Not valid without Sheet 1 of 2 depicting Sketch of Description and bearing the original signature and embossed seal of a Florida registered Surveyor and Mapper. 5. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. ORANGETREE BOULEVARD DESCRIPTION: THE EASTERLY 4.00 FEET OF TRACT "A ", LAKE LUCERNE, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 24, PAGES 48 THROUGH 49, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 0.093 ACRES MORE OR LESS. SCALE I SEC I r DAVID J. HY P. FOR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. NO. 583 NOT VALID WITHOUT - THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED 'SEAL` OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR, AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION %%CL' ASLKISON & SOCIATES INC. = ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I LUUCRNE 1 0014.1 1 EAW 100- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET 10/01 1 OF 1 tol�b �1 FB PG I CHECKED BY DJH DWG. NO. IR —L -182 zi .;S� 0 rn D Q = CD 0 o' n U) n -I CD 0 fi c n m U) 0 0 zr CD gin' -N W (D ch �• c n 0 m 0 0 0 0 CD CD n 0 CAD o 3 aCD fi 0 -I 0 rn n fi 0' n 0 n n n_ m n gin' 0 rn n v 0 U) n 0 n 0 c CD n p °.rn -% M I 0O�N y ' ~ N CL rn Z1 3 0 ?7C CCD O 7 -3—D O I O `G Z o a° -v° � � o � � w no MO fn j -1 0 rt p y CD N (D j. EO O v r+ CO OO W (D "a J-'m Nn fD , D 00 y r � N O a 0 D O °y Z 0 O r-i* O m m 0 -' 71, m 70 CD m Z 5 --- — — S.R. 846 D W0� = D O m -- - - -- C rn�mC (nT1 < m N j rx"'� C-Z O Na m O �E yz °zx In cu O O (�V: Z�°' o _D2 0 L Z7 I r I Cb CA 0 p 2 m m D M � Z M v a) c O O o O � r Cp m I z z O O � O m O C) 0• 0 CD PAtzc -� L 193 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST EXHIBIT-A pawzi._a woZ 71, IMMOKALEE_ 70 CD m Z 5 --- — — S.R. 846 D W0� D C�D� (n OZ Z —�_— -- - - -- ---- - - - - --- - rn�mC (nT1 < �� V) (n C z�v rx"'� C-Z O �� zm <Cv mv�� ZoD� 0— yz °zx In O cn�a m�cmi�z (�V: Z�°' _D2 Db� .•.. Cn O DZ �lU1W� ZC7T 11 DOD '*t Z Ae OL4 j� yW O U)■U) m z Dz° N O 0 IE : -1 W N –' Z CD z IMMOKALEE ROAD — rn D to 0WXm CD — S R 846 — — Z O Co N 2 � CAD mo0- 5� -Z 00- Cl) En a 0 CD U) -'D< D� �' CD oCOyo OD co D m r r C� V/ Z fAlT moz m j 0 m ° :3 o T 0 0 0 /_/� m±P Az `!f pv C7 —O Z o' y, co 0 ° ?. rn oo 0 °. m L4 to N o vi m Z CD rr o 07 j v 0 (n =3 m i 0 0 m to c CD am D m °o a N O D O D O JTE m 0 CD =3 CD CD m a U) 0 0 O. CD N f Q E :3 0- Q N O G7 O m m � N O CO o G7 M r*t O z > 2 0 Go I r I 00 -P v p z 0 O O I O_ 00 I 0 O O C� G C) PAtZctiL ►gy FEE SIMPLE INTEREST N 00'19'10" E 330.00' 0 C m C) N D 0 v PM m ZJ ZJ ;:u A rn D D 0 Is MOI F\ \ \ \ \ \PAPC�1 0 �cm M n N D O v 0') mm -� m ZJ G-) 70 �C7 mm A ;u cn D D C.0 PE+wX.� 101 c� 00 co O Cn O rn 0° C z 8O'321jom S 01'30'15" E 330.17' CD t c . o G� cD cn o a °O z IMMOKALEE ROAD — —mA 3 =` CO � CL o 0WXm � (D O ?I c �p — S R 846 — — Z O Co N 2 � CAD mo0- 5� -Z n' o �°�Q(� Z U) -'D< D� �' CD oCOyo OD co D m r r C� V/ Z fAlT moz m j 0 O co ,.a0 ow77 (m r° o A >g0 O �.o "J.; /_/� m±P Az `!f pv C7 —O Z >0 Mm,,'y y, co 0 ° ?. oo Ul m L4 to N o �! rF- 0 -n> Z CD rr o 07 j v ADZ r`' O m i Pm :0 z iR D °o a N O O D O D O JTE m 0 N O G7 O m m � N O CO o G7 M r*t O z > 2 0 Go I r I 00 -P v p z 0 O O I O_ 00 I 0 O O C� G C) PAtZctiL ►gy FEE SIMPLE INTEREST N 00'19'10" E 330.00' 0 C m C) N D 0 v PM m ZJ ZJ ;:u A rn D D 0 Is MOI F\ \ \ \ \ \PAPC�1 0 �cm M n N D O v 0') mm -� m ZJ G-) 70 �C7 mm A ;u cn D D C.0 PE+wX.� 101 c� 00 co O Cn O rn 0° C z U) 2;Z— S 01'30'15" E 330.17' �v° z z IMMOKALEE ROAD — o 0WXm — — S R 846 — — Z O Co N 2 � CAD z 0 o U) -'D< D� �' r o�> D m r r C� V/ Z fAlT moz Nm�Co m�Dn� °zC°zx co /\ �..�� Q O A >g0 O /_/� m±P Az `!f pv C7 —O Z >0 Mm,,'y Ul m �W(AZZMT J- �Z;71�nQO rF- 0 -n> Z � oU' -P, ADZ r`' O m Pm :0 z iR °o a N O O J 0 m D Q I r CD O O' O n CD v Q fi c rn En co 0 rn rn i i -I G1 (D w �• c n cr r+. O. m O n '-r O O CD (D n n Co O (D 13 Q0 (D 0 rn 0 o' n Q WE N Cl) O CD 0 to 0 3 (n' ED O r+ cn C rn l< 0 a° —mX 0?1CDp''� rnET 5 -O '+ Z O n O_ -V Q p rt O co 00 MO rn 0 -1 rt C1 0 p O COD O0 J to rr C O W (D Q N to N0 rn rr p _ 00 N +' N N O = rl m O 0 � n o co � o I r I o OD 0 0 CD pAaci:L- ivy FEE SIMPLE INTEREST EXHINT A ` GOj m n D PARCEL 185 `o m - -- (D � ° r� r� o� -o�°,z n V - D Z D O M O� m '_ -- S.R. 846 4" D(AXM D Z z O D N O = rl m O 0 � n o co � o I r I o OD 0 0 CD pAaci:L- ivy FEE SIMPLE INTEREST EXHINT A ` GOj m n PARCEL 185 `o m - -- N � ° r� r� o� -o�°,z n V - S 01'30'15" E 330.17' IMMOKALEE ROAD — 00 0 0 r*, m -r '_ -- S.R. 846 4" D(AXM D Z z O coN=cn C.;a>- --_ momc -- -- - - - -- D (n -n M �� () C Z� m > r�-xA VIA � y0< v rn �oZo �r m Zl A 0 0 . �.. -u O_ O kZ4"�C Z — Cn z � V% �.=: p 0 O Z ;. ,< > CA o cn p O r W W' �Z�..I NZ cn O 0o Z j�mn(T/�IIIp Z O m m m O v `° N � O :� O r+- rn D Q. = CD D U) o' cn Q CD Q fi C 7 CD co Q O r-r S CD (n' CD 0 W N z CD C: co O CD c n Q- Q co co gin' o CD M. 7 0 in 0 O �. o o +� 0- 0 rf- z cD O -, CD CD Q Q -1. Q 0 Q O CD Q cQ w c •°' CD Q 55' c<D � � Q CD Cn CD Q O co Q O Q_ 0OD°��m I C n CD CD G7 3< -o COL rn N - o m c rno0� O30 ,c z O do -0 0 ° ;o-F, y Oo MO rn000 o CL 0 4, ° N N _50 vy , CO n0 7 �. (A o N o to Nn rn fi Q _ coca N � w U) O m TI J v G7 n 2 m m v CO I chi I zo 00 O G7 En O m M fA N C .-. N ° cnwm 0 Z 0 D ; XmM �.rC. v ry D z CO Z O c: mOZc � -- ° (n ;u U) c Z m D rXm V/ Zl ND<. v D nZ O fArT - mvLo >nc- co MOZD;n /\ C) 6. z U) -C mCDrnD O_ O �cn� O cnz (�� > a O Zv 0 b ��. O —� O rte— Ww. �Z�Z mm O 0o m -4 Ln 0 y r � z PA2C 'cc_ 18LP FEE SIMPLE INTEREST EXHOT 32 jr I z D -U -q � .l . - O O O m M. � D n z O Dv m O c� m U) O m TI J v G7 n 2 m m v CO I chi I zo 00 O G7 En O m M fA N C .-. N ° cnwm 0 Z 0 D ; XmM �.rC. v ry D z CO Z O c: mOZc � -- ° (n ;u U) c Z m D rXm V/ Zl ND<. v D nZ O fArT - mvLo >nc- co MOZD;n /\ C) 6. z U) -C mCDrnD O_ O �cn� O cnz (�� > a O Zv 0 b ��. O —� O rte— Ww. �Z�Z mm O 0o m -4 Ln 0 y r � z PA2C 'cc_ 18LP FEE SIMPLE INTEREST EXHOT 32 jr I z �,� z, vi O -ern /n w�M,v+m -U -q � .l . - O O O m M. (� z Dv N O O 1 :3 -p� O r+ rn D m O Q O Q m 0 r* c rn co 0 r+ CD cD 10 D O � O v Z D O m 0 C) (n c) O m m -71 m --� N N O CA O G7 Z m m _ m `L v co i 00 J v z 0 O O I 0 00 I O O O C) �W (D O rt in 2. c n O m Q n cn r+ e+ O O -+, -, CD CD n 0 CO O CD �3 �0 D r•+ CD CD CD Q r+ o' n CL N Q O h CT CD Q :' Q rt Cl) CD Q O r+ Q O c CD 0 0 - -h M NdOm�1 `c m a p 3' taco o ?ic (lD O Q 7 -0 o an -00 y 00 mo 0 0 o o -, o p ca 77C- CFD N (D j. + O v N r Cp OO 0� W m o N o to Nn CD rr p _ CAN N 0 D m CJ O r+ CD FEE SIMPLE INTEREST pop UL co ovo c IMMOKALE =AD m Z -- - ---- -- — S.R. 846 > LA X M OX D - -- Z Z�G� (n D — rn mC m v cn m D� / >�/ � cn �� z D N I<rI� V/ zo< p r o <� CD rn�DA /� rnz°zx -< LI), 0— O -' .V � O ro r- rn vmi Z n � Z r5•►.2 -.. Z�_ �w �W�� -D �.° _ 0 CTI Z 37r w O cn m v j j l? n� $� Z m oy a, ° >° N O O J r 0 of Q w f-0 w00 l Q � O :I PAQc7L ,88 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST POINT OF COMMENCEMENT: N.W. CORNER OF SECTION 23 -48 -27 L1 OIL WELL ROAD P.o.6. S.R. 858 N C21 J L3 --� 10' UTILITY EASEMENT —� I ARCEL P J ICl LINE >- I Q L` O BEARING c� J a o L4 z Lj �I Q N I I c/) Q I W I J I � p N 66?n6ii 0 40 80 120 G.J.R. OF NAPLES, INC. O.R. 1524, PG. 2370 THE LAND DESCRIBED IN O.R. BOOK 2229, PAGE 1043 10 SOUTH R.O.W. LINE LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING L1 75.15 S89'53'08 "E L2 50.00 S00'06'52 "W L3 18.64 S89'53'08 "E L4 1 14.36 N89'53'08 "W L5 245.00 f N00'00'02 "E CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS DELTA ARC LENGTH CHORD BEARING CHORD C1 12184.67 1'09'08" 245.03 S01'00'51 "W 245.03 C2 25.00 0-06'50.4 0.05 S89'53'08 "E 0.05 C AVID J. HY P. THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. NO. 58 NOT VALID WITHO ATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON & VIRASSOCIATES INC. = ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB W.O. NO. DRAWN BY FILE NAME AS NOTED OT3 0014.1 EAW 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. NO. 10/01 1 OF 2 DJH IR —L -188 -1 Wide/ e l J r Description: FEE SIMPLE INTEREST ■ A portion of Parcel 1, Orangetree Unit Three, Citrus Green Section, Phase 1 —A according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 14, Page 121, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northwest Corner of Section 23, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida; thence South 89'53'08" East, along the North line of said Section 23, for a distance of 75.15 feet; thence South 00'06'52" West, for a distance of 50.00 feet, to the Southerly Right —of —Way Line of State Road 858 (Oil Well Road) and the Northerly Boundary of the lands described in Official Records Book 2229, Page 1043, of the Public Records of Collier County Florida and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described parcel; thence South 89'53'08" East, along the Northerly Boundary of the said described lands, and along the Southerly Right —of —Way Line of State Road 858 (Oil Well Road, for a distance of 18.64 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Easterly, whose radius point bears South 88'24'35" East, a distance of 12,184.67 feet therefrom; thence run Southerly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 12,184.67 feet, through a central angle of 01'09'08 ", subtended by a chord of 245.03 feet at a bearing of South 01'00'51" West, for an arc length of 245.03 feet to the end of said curve to the Southerly Boundary of said described land; thence North 89'53'08" West, along the Southerly Boundary of the said described land, for a distance of 14.36 feet, to a point on the Easterly Right —of —Way line for Immokolee Road, as dedicated on the said plat of Orangetree Unit Three; thence North 00'00'02" East, along said Easterly Right —of —Way line, for a distance of 245.00 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Southerly, whose radius point bears South 00'03'24" West, a distance of 25.00 feet therefrom; thence run Easterly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 25.00 feet, through a central angle of 00'06'56 ", subtended by a chord of 0.05 feet at a bearing of South 89'53'08" East, for an arc length of 0.05 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.091 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. Not valid without Sheet 1 of 2 depicting Sketch of Description and bearing the original signature and embossed seal of a Florida registered Surveyor and Mapper. 5. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON & MRASSO INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME I AS NOTED I OT3 1 0014.1 1 EAW 100- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET 10/01 2 OF 2 FB PG I CHECKED BY DJH DWG. NO IR —L -188 -2 J O (D W ,-t N (D D (n Q_ _ �• c CT' CL .. (T � 0 (D (n (p11 O p O -4, ( CD (� (D Q 0 N (D m Q_ 3 m v Z o � c p N (D CD N p < Q 3 � (D N cn a (D -n _o° m O Z 0 -' O i m m C- X D = m CD co O O I 0 I z I zz O D CD Q m C) N Z 0 O N -n p O (D Q p : N (Q c I m 0 % OD (0 O Ul O s I✓ y W N (A P,4 i2 c CL, r $ 01 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST N 00'19'10" E 330.00' W-,ANA *Q'--`aamaCL*0wcD -*ODDD A c <1 � W 7 h(a —. toil C C to O 0 Z •+ � 9 1-0 y O D rt D O ff* .+ .+ O. O _ 7 7 7 3 S 7 f ZNaj0�Of =Ntc (AD(A06003 N070 N0a -1 OV00 OO7N UO G7 . � rt 00O (3D D rt A Nw N P +`< 0O -w O� 0z n O rt �� W 0 0 p W p jD:m� 06= NN0�O0 m rt 0 iD 0'� fc0_to NtC ay(� .vi-rt SO o A 3 --h r 0 . 5' O 7rt' K 0 ti (D O d (D N 0 4n C W O A O r, r+ D(D co a D N O 0 rt7 Ort(2 - =CT -oA 0 a- Q,°, Gi A C�JI 7' 0 CL ODD 0 0 N 0. 0 7� y� (D O 1 O n (A o .► (D 7 Z a D p C7 7 a ID y N Z `< -P 0, � �' w "" O O3 rt 7 0 �D 7 O O .�0 0 0 0 0 h`G A j W 3��.-',Mo� ---- o' =0"0 000 a _ =r ? y o a Ort� 0'00 0 y, m =�.W��(A 'D am O� r► 0 0� z < (AD CO C O 3 O a h 7 0 N d .0�+ CN1i C (O � o (AD c y =r • ODNa via =U'cA„0OA �""C On l< 0 S (D z � W c (rt° rt � 7 z •0CJ :OOmf�Dr."— ao.: -w 0 0 CA= ,.. :r V (e =r -� O N y 70C N OmpjO ?Qym' n0�0t�Orr =n 0 N a A d Orn O `� D n D 17 . (D O =r 0 -D CL (o a O y W a 5 ' m 12 PAUL MASTERS z TERESA A. MASTERS w O.R. 2705, PG. 313 0 po r� N (IN3ZV ( W '' O 0 A O 7 i� 00 co O CA Cs Cli y N N �o r� S 01'30'15' E 330.17' D A .- O Or�* �� D L Z O 0 rr- D (n C, O O m ^Q V J m m cn 0 �� r -CC -i N C Z '"� m. -;u �%� -' N a) -n _o° m O Z 0 -' O i m m C- X D = m CD co O O I 0 I z I zz O D CD Q m C) N Z 0 O N -n p O (D Q p : N (Q c I m 0 % OD (0 O Ul O s I✓ y W N (A P,4 i2 c CL, r $ 01 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST N 00'19'10" E 330.00' W-,ANA *Q'--`aamaCL*0wcD -*ODDD A c <1 � W 7 h(a —. toil C C to O 0 Z •+ � 9 1-0 y O D rt D O ff* .+ .+ O. O _ 7 7 7 3 S 7 f ZNaj0�Of =Ntc (AD(A06003 N070 N0a -1 OV00 OO7N UO G7 . � rt 00O (3D D rt A Nw N P +`< 0O -w O� 0z n O rt �� W 0 0 p W p jD:m� 06= NN0�O0 m rt 0 iD 0'� fc0_to NtC ay(� .vi-rt SO o A 3 --h r 0 . 5' O 7rt' K 0 ti (D O d (D N 0 4n C W O A O r, r+ D(D co a D N O 0 rt7 Ort(2 - =CT -oA 0 a- Q,°, Gi A C�JI 7' 0 CL ODD 0 0 N 0. 0 7� y� (D O 1 O n (A o .► (D 7 Z a D p C7 7 a ID y N Z `< -P 0, � �' w "" O O3 rt 7 0 �D 7 O O .�0 0 0 0 0 h`G A j W 3��.-',Mo� ---- o' =0"0 000 a _ =r ? y o a Ort� 0'00 0 y, m =�.W��(A 'D am O� r► 0 0� z < (AD CO C O 3 O a h 7 0 N d .0�+ CN1i C (O � o (AD c y =r • ODNa via =U'cA„0OA �""C On l< 0 S (D z � W c (rt° rt � 7 z •0CJ :OOmf�Dr."— ao.: -w 0 0 CA= ,.. :r V (e =r -� O N y 70C N OmpjO ?Qym' n0�0t�Orr =n 0 N a A d Orn O `� D n D 17 . (D O =r 0 -D CL (o a O y W a 5 ' m 12 PAUL MASTERS z TERESA A. MASTERS w O.R. 2705, PG. 313 0 po r� N (IN3ZV ( W '' O 0 A O 7 i� 00 co O CA Cs Cli y N N �o r� S 01'30'15' E 330.17' L4 M Enc ov 1MMOKALEE ROAD 0-lh,mm _ = S.R. 846 D Wom D (n C, O ma'm c m yy�D < �X< cn 0 �� r -CC �l R oO O Z '"� m. -;u �%� A � (^ 2 C _`� FiS2v• (l1,-,-u -U)Z ou) O Z L>i j ` p Z O`er O O a o Go (A v 71 z ��WZZT� y O O v m '/ /�1 L44;0 D rnD8 m O �m Z O D ; ozv D r P.O.B. I ZE I I I I I00 CL I w I N I n I I LO I n I ° I o Z � I Ici a O a- cn IUJ d W 00 IQI� I Y Uj �O I� I I I I I � I I l/y 6 Ib I I I I I i� 00 rn 0 �r LO O 4V S89'53'08 "E 9.02' P PRCEL 190 A �3 R= 12,214.67 L= 330.90 Tan = 165.47 a=-1 '33' 08" R =25.00 L =27.30 Tan =15.19 A- =62'33'57" OIL WELL ROAD_ S.R. 848 PAft Crr L i oi DA FEE SIMPLE INTEREST Description: - I NOT TO SCALE A portion of Tract "C ", Waterways of Naples, Unit Two, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 29, Pages 71 through 74 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwesterly Corner of said Tract ' ,' "C"; thence South 89'53 08 East, along the Northerly Boundary of said Tract "C ", for a distance of 9.02 feet; thence South 03'35'47" West, for a distance of 1,493.87 feet to the beginning of a tangential circular curve, concave Easterly; thence run Southerly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 12,214.67 feet, through a central angle of 01'33'08 ", subtended by a chord of 330.89 feet at a bearing of South 02'49'13" West, for an arc length of 330.90 feet to a point on the Southerly Boundary of said Tract "C ", and the Northerly Right of Way Line of State Road 848 (Oil Well Road), and on a circular curve, concave Northeasterly, whose radius point bears North 31'01'50" East, a distance of 25.00 feet therefrom; thence run Northwesterly, along the arc of said curve to the right, and along the Southerly Border of said Tract "C ", having a radius of 25.00 feet, through a central angle of 62'33'57 ", subtended by a chord of 25.96 feet at a bearing of North 27'41'12" West, for an arc length of 27.30 feet to the end of said curve; thence North 03'35'47" East, along the Westerly Boundary of said Tract "C ", for a distance of 1,801.99 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.386 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. All dimensions are plat, unless otherwise noted. 'f�)Aj D VID J. HYA P.S.FE OR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. NO. 834 NOT VALID WITHOUT IGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISoN & ASSOCIATES INC. = ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 I S(:ALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED DATE 10/01 1013!10/ WW2 1 0014.1 1 EAW 100- 018— OOO.DWG SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 1 OF 1 1 I DJH DWG. NO. IR— L -190A J r P.O.B. M I I I °' � to ,00 a ! w r� io o z � I I� Q 0 Iw 00 w °0 iQl� i Y Uj �o I I I � I Ib I I � I 00 IS LO 0 S89'53'08 "E 9.02' PARCE- 1g0N �3 R= 12,214.67 L= 330.90 Tan = 165.47 0=1 '33' 08" R =25.00 L =27.30 Tan= 15.19 a= 62'33'57" OIL WELL ROAD_ S.R. 848 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST PAtZCt L 190A Description: Is A ' 'm lul II NOT TO SCALE A portion of Tract "C ", Waterways of Naples, Unit Two, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 29, Pages 71 through 74 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northwesterly Corner of said Tract "C"; thence South 89'53'08" East, along the Northerly Boundary of said Tract "C ", for a distance of 9.02 feet; thence South 03'35'47" West, for a distance of 1,493.87 feet to the beginning of a tangential circular curve, concave Easterly; thence run Southerly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 12,214.67 feet, through a central angle of 01'33'08 ", subtended by a chord of 330.89 feet at a bearing of South 02'49'13" West, for an arc length of 330.90 feet to a point on the Southerly Boundary of said Tract "C ", and the Northerly Right of Way Line of State Road 848 (Oil Well Road), and on a circular curve, concave Northeasterly, whose radius point bears North 31'01'50" East, a distance of 25.00 feet therefrom; thence run Northwesterly, along the arc of said curve to the right, and along the Southerly Border of said Tract "C ", having a radius of 25.00 feet, through a central angle of 62'33'57 ", subtended by a chord of 25.96 feet at a bearing of North 27'41'12" West, for an arc length of 27.30 feet to the end of said curve; thence North 03'35'47" East, along the Westerly Boundary of said Tract "C ", for a distance of 1,801.99 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.386 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. All dimensions are plat, unless otherwise noted. i DAVID J. RYA , P. (FOR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. NO.,/583f/ NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON & ASSOCIATES W W INC. ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. L85770 SCALE SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. DRAWN BY FILE NAME AS NOTED WW2 0014.1 EAW 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. NO, 10/01 1 OF 1 DJH IR— L -190A r 0 Q LrJ 0✓ Ld J n� Q Y 0 O PERPETUAL, NON- EXCLUSIVE DRAINAGE EASEMENT I� I W of Z CO J 3 0 N ¢ 1- W r 0 co W S00 �0 0 z I=¢ or°•' 1 rn J 3 �v 1 0 LU 3a V) wr- I 6:w 0:: o� I a¢ o :�W I rn J IW 0 � IrL I NW CORNER OF WATERWAYS OF NAPLES UNIT TWO PLAT BOOK 29, PAGES 71 -74 9.00' �S 88'41'34" E 93.00' S 88'41'34" E 'bINT OF BEGINNING: 3 N � I PARCEL 890A aro 0 0 to i N 88 41'34" W 93.00' Notes: 1. This is not a survey. EXHIMT..�. Page �_e7_ OE N 0 25 50 75 SCALE: 1"=50' A portion of Tract "C" of Waterways of Naples Unit Two as recorded in Plat Book 29 at Pages 71 through 74 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the northwesterly most corner of said Tract "C" run South 01'18'26" West along the westerly boundary of said Tract "C" also being the easterly right of way line of Immokalee Road for a distance of 1169.46 feet; thence run South 88'41'34" East for a distance of 9.00 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence continue South 88'41'34" East for 93.00 feet; thence South 01'18'26" West for a distance of 50.00 feet; thence North 88'41'34" West for a distance of 93.00 feet; Thence run North 01'18'26" East for a distance of 50.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 0.107 acres more or less 2. Basis of bearing is state plane coordinates, Florida East Zone. (5J DAVID J. HY _ T, P.S (FOR THE FIRM) 3. Subject to easements, FLA. LIC. N 583 -' reservations and restrictions of NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA record. LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER 4. All dimensions are plat SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION unless otherwise noted. VIAI:A I LK I So N 8C SSOCIATES INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME I AS NOTED I WATERW 1 0014.1 1 EAW I 0014- 890A.DWG 17_10 REVISED 2/18/021 01/02 SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 1 OF 1 1 I DJH `. DWG. NO. IR— L -890A J FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IOAtJ cE`cL �trii) 3 y. 66P%66 0 50 100 150 Description: y A portion of Tract "A ", Waterways of Naples, Unit Four, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 31, Pages 39 through 42, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwesterly Corner of said Tract "A "; thence North 01'18'26" East, along the Westerly Boundary of said Tract "A ", for a distance of 232.01 feet, to the Northwesterly Corner of said Tract "A ", and to a point on a circular curve, concave Easterly, whose radius point bears South 88'41'03" East, a distance of 50.00 feet therefrom; thence run Southerly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, through a central angle of 34'55'26 ", subtended by a chord of 30.01 feet at a bearing of South 16'08'46" East, for an arc length of 30.48 feet to the end of said curve; thence South 01'18'26" West, for a distance of 87.38 feet; thence South 88'41'34" East, for a distance of 12.00 feet; thence South 01'18'26" West, for a distance of 75.27 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Southeasterly, whose radius point bears South 34'08'36" East, a distance of 50.00 feet therefrom; thence run Southwesterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, through a central angle of 54'32'58 ", subtended by a chord of 45.83 feet at a bearing of South 28'34'55" West, for an arc length of 47.60 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.062 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise n oted. lIZZ DAVID J. HY FLA. LIC. . 5 (FOR THE FIRM) NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON 8c ASSOCIATES WW INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED IWATERWASI 0014.1 EAW 100- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. NO. 10/01 1 OF 1 DJH IR— L -190B in 1 1* G R =50.00 L =30.48 Tan =15.73 a= 34'55'26" 0 O O 04 N -C,0 cD � N 00 M �^ IW 00 000 S88'41'34 "E TRACT J w 12.00' Y [If to 'co- r- WATERWAYS OF NAPLES / OI �N UNIT FOUR Z oLO P.B. 31, PG. 39 -42 / g08 u.E. IR= 50.00° pPRCE` L =47.60 Tan =25.78 P.O.B. �I I A= 54'32'58" y. 66P%66 0 50 100 150 Description: y A portion of Tract "A ", Waterways of Naples, Unit Four, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 31, Pages 39 through 42, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwesterly Corner of said Tract "A "; thence North 01'18'26" East, along the Westerly Boundary of said Tract "A ", for a distance of 232.01 feet, to the Northwesterly Corner of said Tract "A ", and to a point on a circular curve, concave Easterly, whose radius point bears South 88'41'03" East, a distance of 50.00 feet therefrom; thence run Southerly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, through a central angle of 34'55'26 ", subtended by a chord of 30.01 feet at a bearing of South 16'08'46" East, for an arc length of 30.48 feet to the end of said curve; thence South 01'18'26" West, for a distance of 87.38 feet; thence South 88'41'34" East, for a distance of 12.00 feet; thence South 01'18'26" West, for a distance of 75.27 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Southeasterly, whose radius point bears South 34'08'36" East, a distance of 50.00 feet therefrom; thence run Southwesterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, through a central angle of 54'32'58 ", subtended by a chord of 45.83 feet at a bearing of South 28'34'55" West, for an arc length of 47.60 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.062 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise n oted. lIZZ DAVID J. HY FLA. LIC. . 5 (FOR THE FIRM) NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON 8c ASSOCIATES WW INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED IWATERWASI 0014.1 EAW 100- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. NO. 10/01 1 OF 1 DJH IR— L -190B in 1 1* G r 0 O Of Ld 00 LLl J . Q O I z M V) N I f- n Z DN WJQ 3 CL d io U¢ �o0 0 �0 m 3 ►- Er ¢ �a 3 PAP,G'i�1. `9OC PERPETUAL, NON - EXCLUSIVE EMBI " DRAINAGE EASEMENT Frop q�� A& POINT OF COMMENCEMENT• NW CORNER OF TRACT "B" 74' ACCESS EASEMENT I I I I I I J I 0 N 71.00' 88'51'04" m NPOINT OF BEGIN IO PARCEL 890C z 88'51'04' w 71.00' I L 15. I I 1)0' Notes: TRACT "B" WATERWAYS OF NAPLES UNIT SEVEN PLAT BOOK 36, PAGES 72 -77 I 0 25 50 75 SCALE: 1"=50' 3 A portion of Tract "B" of Waterways of (0- Naples Unit Seven as recorded in Plat co $ ° Book 36 at Pages 72 through 77 of � ' 'n the Public Records of Collier County, ° Florida being more particularly described as follows: 1. This is not a survey. Commencing at the northwesterly most corner of said Tract "B" run South 01'18'56" West along the westerly boundary of said Tract "B" also being the easterly boundary of Tract "E" of said Waterways Unit 7, for a distance of 1211.39 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence run South 88'51'04" East for 71.00 feet; thence South 01'08'56" West for a distance of 50.00 feet; thence North 88'51'04" West for a distance of 71.00 feet; Thence run North 01'08'56" East for a distance of 50.00 feet to the Point of Beginning. Containing 0.081 acres more or less 2. Basis of bearing is state � plane coordinates Florida East Zone. DAVID J. H ATeOUT .M. (FOR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. 0. 3. Subject to easements, NOT VALID WI THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA reservations and restrictions of LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER record. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION 4. All dimensions are plat ' LK I S O N I unless otherwise noted. So C I AT E S INC. )• 5. L.M.E. Refers to Lake ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS Maintenance Easement. 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. L85770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I WATERW 1 0014.1 1 EAW I 0014- 890C.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. NO. 01/02 1 OF 1 DJH IR— L -890C J r PA9ct L- X90 C� EX FEE SIMPLE INTEREST pop .81 R =40.00 UNIT FOUR V . P.B. 31, PG. 39 -42 N Tan-25.78 A-- 4'32'58' � 10' UTILITY EASEMENT n DO L6 o N I 0 J I 0 20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT o c v ~ I Q N86- 24'13"W Z Z � 3.00' Z ( 0 0 0 50 100 150 d - Li w 00 n co 0 o w I V) U¢ Y vi U �rn Q o M ry 0 0 I 0 Z N86'24'13 "W I 9.00' o0 Irn N ILo I I 1.0 I M I� OF BEGINNING: N89'53'08 "W I I 9.02' DAVID J. HY S (FOR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. N 583 NOT VALID WITHO T THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON & ASSOCIATES INC. = ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB W. 0. N0. DRAWN BY FILE NAME AS NOTED WATERW 0014.1 EAW 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. NO. 10/01 1 OF 2 DJH IR— L- 19OD -1 r. 7-101 J Fm- Description: FEE SIMPLE INTEREST PA-rz c i L t 90 D r : � A portion of Tract "C ", Waterways of Naples, Unit Three, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 31, Pages 35 through 38 , Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Southwesterly Corner of said Tract "C "; thence North 03'35'47" East, along the Westerly Boundary Line of said Tract "C ", for a distance of 630.67 feet to the beginning of a tangential circular curve, concave Southeasterly, thence run Northeasterly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, through a central angle of 54'32'58 ", subtended by a chord of 45.83 feet at a bearing of North 30'52'16" East, for an arc length of 47.60 feet to the end of said curve; thence South 03'35'47" West, for a distance of 215.87 feet; thence North 86'24'13" West, for a distance of 3.00 feet; thence South 03'35'47" West, for a distance of 200.00 feet; thence North 86'24'13" West, for a distance of 9.00 feet; thence South 03'35'47" West, for a distance of 254.98 feet; thence North 89'53'08" West, along the Southerly Boundary of said Tract "C ", for a distance of 9.02 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.234 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. Not valid without Sheet 1 of 2 depicting Sketch of Description and bearing the original signature and embossed seal of a Florida registered Surveyor and Mapper. 5. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON Sc VIRASSOCIATES INC. = ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. L85770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I WATERW 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE 10/01 II I L IV/ SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 2 OF 2 1 I DJH DWG. N0. IR— L- 1901 -2 J Q O w 00 J � Q olc/i P. a PAtZCf L g910D TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (DURATION: 3 YEARS FROM COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION) X�pop q-11 O P PRCE` 190D N L2 TRACT 'A" / WATERWAYS OF NAPLES / i J UNIT FOUR P.B. 31, PG. 39 -42 / C210' U.E. / cl P.O. C. I I 0 50 100 150 LINE TABLE_ LINE I LENGTH I BEARING L1 75.27 N01 18'26"E L2 10.00 S88'41'34 "E L3 69.75 S01'1 8'26"W CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS DELTA ARC LENGTH CHORD BEARING CHORD Cl 50.00 54'32'58" 47.60 N28'34'55 "E 45.83 C2 50.00 13'07'01" 11.45 S62'24'54 "W 11.42 a ! ' I oll DAVID J. HY J -(FOR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. NO. 5 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON & %%RASSOCIATES INC. = ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED ATERWA 0014.1 1 EAW 00- 018- OOO.DWG DATE SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BYJ DWG. NO. 10/01 1 OF 2 DJH IR- L- 79OD -1 I7F76 rI TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (DURATION: 3 YEARS FROM COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION) Pat c'.1' -49D fl Temporary Driveway Restoration Easement Description: EXHMIT A portion of Tract "A ", Waterways of Naples, Unit Four, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 7, Pages 39 through 42 , Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southwesterly Corner of said Tract "A ", said point being the beginning of a curve, concave Southeasterly, having a radius of 50.00 feet and a central angle of 54'32'58 "; thence run Northeasterly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, through a central angle of 54'32'58 ", subtended by a chord of 45.83 feet at a bearing of North 28'34'55" East, for an arc length of 47.60 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described parcel and the end of said curve; thence North 01'18'26" East, for a distance of 75.27 feet; thence South 88'41'34" East, for a distance of 10.00 feet; thence South 01'18'26" West, for a distance of 69.75 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Southeasterly, whose radius point bears South 21'01'36" East, a distance of 50.00 feet therefrom; thence run Southwesterly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, through a central angle of 13'07'01 ", subtended by a chord of 11.42 feet at a bearing of South 62'24'54" West, for an arc length of 11.45 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.017 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. Not valid without Sheet 1 of 2 depicting Sketch of Description and bearing the original signature and embossed seal of a Florida registered Surveyor and Mapper. 5. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON & MRASSOCIATES INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED IWATERWAYI 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET 10/01 2 OF 2 r��za rr FB PG I CHECKED BY DJH DWG. NO IR— L- 790D -2 AR IPA ►Z,,C fc L -7-90 6 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (DURATION: 3 YEARS FROM COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION) �1 P.0 C. C1 P.O.B. C2 Q w co J J RCE �gp8 w bi o0 P P TRACT "A" / Q Ir L2 N WATERWAYS OF NAPLES / O1 UNIT FOUR P.B. 31, PG. 39 -42 / 0 U.E. / I I ? 0 50 100 150 LINE TABLE LINE LENGTH BEARING L1 87.38 S01 "18'26 "W L2 10.00 S88'41'34 "E L3 76.77 N01- 18'26 "E CURVE TABLE CURVE RADIUS DELTA ARC LENGTH CHORD BEARING CHORD Cl 50.00 34'55'26" 30.48 S16'08'46 "E 30.01 C2 50.00 16'46'07" 14.63 N41 *59'33"W 14.58 DAVID J. ATT .S.M. FOR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. NO. 34 NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON & VIRASSOCIATES INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB W.O. NO. DRAWN BY FILE NAME AS NOTED WATERWAY 0014.1 EAW 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. N0. 10/01 1 OF 2 DJH IR— L- 7908 -1 to TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (DURATION: 3 YEARS FROM COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION) Pit Q c 4 L 1'70_6 Temporary Driveway Restoration Easement Description: A portion of Tract "A ", Waterways of Naples, Unit Four, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 31, Pages 39 through 42, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northwesterly Corner of said Tract "A ", said point being the beginning of a curve, concave Easterly, having a radius of 50.00 feet and a central angle of 34'55'26 "; thence run Southerly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 50.00 feet, through a central angle of 34'55'26 ", subtended by a chord of 30.01 feet at a bearing of South 16'08'46" East, for an arc length of 30.48 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described parcel and the end of said curve; thence South 01'18'26" West, for a distance of 87.38 feet; thence South 88'41'34" East, for a distance of 10.00 feet; thence North 01'18'26" East, for a distance of 76.77 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Northeasterly, whose radius point bears North 39'37'24" East, a distance of 50.00 feet therefrom; thence run Northwesterly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, through a central angle of 16'46'07 ", subtended by a chord of 14.58 feet at a bearing of North 41'59'33" West, for an arc length of 14.63 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.018 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. Not valid without Sheet 1 of 2 depicting Sketch of Description and bearing the original signature and embossed seal of a Florida registered Surveyor and Mapper. 5. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION \AA WILKISON & ASSOCIATES INC. ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 I SUALL I 5LC /5Ut3 I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED IWATERWAYI 0014.1 1 EAW 100- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. NO. 10/01 2 OF 2 DJH IR —L -79013 17 77 r 0 Q O � c0 w 00 w Q o% 01 Q LL- 0 c� w Of D V_ Lo N W F- 0 Q F- i) ri r0 PA (Lct L 7cl 0 G TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (DURATION: 3 YEARS FROM COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION) 74' ACCESS EASEMENT 11.00' P ARCS` 1(30C TRACT "B" WATERWAYS OF NAPLES UNIT 7 Temporary Driveway Restoration Easement Description: 66?!%66 0 50 100 150 The Westerly 11.00 feet, of the Northerly 637.39 feet of Tract "B ", Waterways of Naples, Unit 7, as Recorded in Plat Book 36, Pages 72, through Page 77, of the Public Records of Collier DAVID J. HYAT ,, P. (0R THE FIRM) County, Florida. Containing 0.161 acres, more or FLA. LIC. NO 5834 less. NOT VALID WITHOU THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON 8c ASSOCIATES INC. = ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I WW7 1 0014.1 1 EAW 100- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET 10/01 1 OF 1 ea031 A/ FB PG I CHECKED BY DJH DWG. NO IR— L -790C J r 0 Q O (i' co d- LiJ 00 W Q Y Uj O �I LL. 0 0 it w Of Z) D V_ in N W F-� U Q 11.00' 0) M TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (DURATION: 3 YEARS FROM COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION) PAICC 4 L -490 C 74' ACCESS EASEMENT co �PPRC�`'9oc TRACT "B" WATERWAYS OF NAPLES UNIT 7 Temporary Driveway Restoration Easement Description: E w P. r-.L P 66?!%i6 0 50 100 150 The Westerly feet of Tract 11.00 feet, of the "B ", Waterways of Northerly 637.39 Naples, Unit 7, as Recorded in Plat Book 36, Pages 72, through Page 77, of the Public Records of Collier AVID J. Y T, OR THE FIRM) County, Florida. Containing 0.161 acres, more or FLA. LIC. 58 TTHE less. NOT VALID WITHO SIGNATU RE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON 8c VJAA I NC. i1• ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. L85770 SCALE SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY FILE NAME AS NOTED I WW7 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE I SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY DWG. NO. 10/01 1 OF 1 DJH IR— L -790C J r 0 O Notes: Pa12« L -+90E TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (DURATION: 3 YEARS FROM COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION) UNIT FOUR V P.B. 31, PG. 39 -42 10' UTILITY EASEM NE T� 20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT I Uti I— z Co ry�W Z U S86'24'1 YE o I 9.00' EXHMIT Ar7- OE 66?!%ii6 0 50 100 150 Temporary Driveway Restoration Easement Description: A portion of Tract "C ", Waterways of Naples, 00 Unit Three, according to the plat thereof as r7 recorded in Plat Book 31, Pages 35 through 38 4-- of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, w 00 Commence at the Southwesterly Corner of said M Tract "C "; thence South 89'53'08" East, along othe Southerly Boundary of said Tract "C ", for a J distance of 9.02 feet, to the POINT OF � � O �I 254.98 feet; thence South 86'24'13" East, for a distance of 9.00 feet; thence South 03'35'47" East, for a distance of 253.84 feet; thence P.0.6. 00 rn feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.053 acres, more or less. J I �I iU-) r ro 0 PARCEL I790E z I 89'5 O8 "W 9.0 P.O. C. S89'5 -1 �08"E 9.02 Notes: Pa12« L -+90E TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (DURATION: 3 YEARS FROM COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION) UNIT FOUR V P.B. 31, PG. 39 -42 10' UTILITY EASEM NE T� 20' LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT I Uti I— z Co ry�W Z U S86'24'1 YE o I 9.00' EXHMIT Ar7- OE 66?!%ii6 0 50 100 150 Temporary Driveway Restoration Easement Description: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. r � DAVID J. A , .P (FOR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. 0410. 5 4 NOT VALID WI UT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION �1 WILKISoN 8C ASSOCIATES INC. >• ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. L85770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I WATERW 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET 10/01 1 OF 1 FB PG I CHECKED BY DJH DWG. NO IR— L -790E J A portion of Tract "C ", Waterways of Naples, 00 Unit Three, according to the plat thereof as r7 recorded in Plat Book 31, Pages 35 through 38 N of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southwesterly Corner of said M Tract "C "; thence South 89'53'08" East, along othe Southerly Boundary of said Tract "C ", for a co distance of 9.02 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described parcel; thence North 03'35'47" East, for a distance of 254.98 feet; thence South 86'24'13" East, for a distance of 9.00 feet; thence South 03'35'47" East, for a distance of 253.84 feet; thence P.0.6. North 89'53'08" West, for a distance of 9.02 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.053 acres, more or less. 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. r � DAVID J. A , .P (FOR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. 0410. 5 4 NOT VALID WI UT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION �1 WILKISoN 8C ASSOCIATES INC. >• ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. L85770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I WATERW 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET 10/01 1 OF 1 FB PG I CHECKED BY DJH DWG. NO IR— L -790E J r R =50.00 L =11.45 Tan =5.75 a= 13'07'01 " PAQC�,L g9oF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (DURATION: 3 YEARS FROM COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION) `rn 10' UTILITY EASEMENT N N W cfl N O PARCEL 79OF \-N88'41'34 "W 3.00' O 0 IN o zw I N ICp N co U U) L W .— V) ~ Q U 00 r-- ZQ i S88'41'34 "E O Z 1 3. 0' 1� I a O O w w 00 Q O Vi I W :2 CO I00 S 8.21' 0 "E z 18.00 I PAQC�,L g9oF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (DURATION: 3 YEARS FROM COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION) `rn 10' UTILITY EASEMENT N N W cfl N O PARCEL 79OF \-N88'41'34 "W 3.00' O 0 U �- o zw Z N I—QW co U U) L W .— V) ~ Q U "E ZQ N8 0 0.00' o I m I \POINT OF BEGINNING: Lo I ' N I W co N a7' O Z 20 LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT I 10E �9 66?!%6 0 50 100 150 004�1 JA4 DAVID J. //TT,' P . . (FOR THE FIRM) FLA. LIC. �j 5 NOT VALID WITH T THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON & VIRASSOCIATES INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB I W.O. N0. I DRAWN BY FILE NAME AS NOTED I WW 3 1 0014.1 1 EAW 1 00- 018- OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG I CHECKED BYJ DWG. N0. 10/01 1 OF 2 1 DJH I IR- L- 79OF -1 I" t31 %0l mi TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (DURATION: 3 YEARS r FROM COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION) PAKCEL- 7ciDF Temporary Driveway Restoration Easement Description: Im E T B X _.._.. �H�1� 10E A portion of Tract "C ", Waterways of Naples, Unit Three, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 31, Pages 35 through 38 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Southeasterly Corner of said Tract "C "; thence North 01'18'26" East, along the Westerly Boundary of said Tract "C ", for a distance of 255.59 feet; thence South 88'21'20" East, for a distance of 18.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described parcel; thence North 01'18'26" East, for a distance of 199.94 feet; thence South 88'41'34" East, for a distance of 3.00 feet; thence North 01'18'26" East, for a distance of 215.87 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Southeasterly, whose radius point bears South 34'08'36" East, a distance of 50.00 feet therefrom; thence run Northeasterly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 50.00 feet, through a central angle of 13'07'01 ", subtended by a chord of 11.42 feet at a bearing of North 62'24'54" East, for an arc length of 11.45 feet to the end of said curve; thence South 01'18'26" West, for a distance of 221.39 feet; thence North 88'41'34" West, for a distance of 3.00 feet; thence South 01'18'26" West, for a distance of 200.00 feet; thence North 88'21'20" West, for a distance of 10.00 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.096 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. All dimensions are plat unless otherwise noted. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION \M/A WILKISON & ASSOCIATES �IIINIC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I WW 3 1 0014.1 1 EAW 100- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. NO. 10/01 2 OF 2 DJH IR— L- 790E -2 J r P.O.C. S89'53'08 "E % 9.02' S89'53'08 "E 9.02' ao ri rn r- Lv Lo O P� Q � O rn W 3 Q rl Y O `n M ro � O N TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION .O.B. EASEMENT (DURATION: 3 YEARS FROM COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION) P PRcEL 790A PARCEL. 790A i M R 3 EXHIBIT paw� N NOT TO SCALE DAVID J. 'HY T, P.S'IOf. FOR THE FIRM FLA. LI C. N 583 ' (FOR NOT VALID WITH THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WLKISON & VIRMAS' S OCIATES INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB W. 0. N0. DRAWN BY FILE NAME AS NOTED WW2 0014.1 EAW 00- 018- 0OO.DWG DATE REVISED 01/30/02 1 10/01 SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. NO. 1 OF 2 DJH IR- L- 79OA -1 J 204.67 .45 S86'24'15.74 5.06' 40" R= 12,214.99.67 L= 330.90 .23 Ll Tan = 165.41.12 A=- 1'33'08" '21" L ROAD R =25.00 . 848L =12.33 Tan =6.2 A--28'15'41" EXHIBIT paw� N NOT TO SCALE DAVID J. 'HY T, P.S'IOf. FOR THE FIRM FLA. LI C. N 583 ' (FOR NOT VALID WITH THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WLKISON & VIRMAS' S OCIATES INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB W. 0. N0. DRAWN BY FILE NAME AS NOTED WW2 0014.1 EAW 00- 018- 0OO.DWG DATE REVISED 01/30/02 1 10/01 SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. NO. 1 OF 2 DJH IR- L- 79OA -1 J TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT (DURATION: 3 YEARS ,- FROM COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION) EXHIBIT paw'lia-4 Ti pa2c ti L o A 10E Temporary Driveway Restoration Easement Description: A portion of Tract "C ", Waterways of Naples, Unit Two, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 29, Pages 71 through 74 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northwesterly Corner of said Tract "C "; thence South 89'53'08" East, along the Northerly Boundary of said Tract "C ", for a distance of 9.02 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described parcel; thence continuing South 89'53'08" East, along the Northerly Boundary of said Tract "C ", for a distance of 9.02 feet; thence South 03'35'47" West, for a distance of 1,494.47 feet to the beginning of a tangential circular curve, concave Easterly; thence run Southerly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 12,204.67 feet, through a central angle of 00'42'40 ", subtended by a chord of 151.45 feet at a bearing of South 03'14'27" West, for an arc length of 151.45 feet to the end of said curve; thence South 86'24'13" East, for a distance of 5.06 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Easterly, whose radius point bears South 86'24'13" East, a distance of 12,199.67 feet therefrom; thence run Southerly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 12,199.67 feet, through a central angle of 00'51'21 ", subtended by a chord of 182.23 feet at a bearing of South 03'10'07" West, for an arc length of 182.23 feet to a point on the Southerly Boundary of said Tract "C ", and the Northerly Right of Way Line of State Road 848 (Oil Well Road), and on a circular curve, concave Northerly, whose radius point bears North 02'46'09" East, a distance of 25.00 feet therefrom; thence run Westerly, along the arc of said curve to the right, and along the Southerly Boundary of said Tract "C ", having a radius of 25.00 feet, through a central angle of 28'15'41 ", subtended by a chord of 12.21 feet at a bearing of North 73'06'01" West, for an arc length of 12.33 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Easterly, whose radius point bears South 87'57'21" East, a distance of 12,214.67 feet therefrom; thence run Northerly, along the arc of said curve to the right, having a radius of 12,214.67 feet, through a central angle of 01'33'08 ", subtended by a chord of 330.89 feet at a bearing of North 02'49'13" East, for an arc length of 330.90 feet to the end of said curve; thence North 03'3547" East, for a distance of 1,493.87 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.394 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is plat. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. All dimensions are plat, unless otherwise noted. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION \AKA WILKISON & ASSOCIATES INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. L85770 I SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED I WW2 1 0014.1 1 EAW 100- 018— OOO.DWG DATE REVISED 01/30/021 10/01 SHEET I FB PG I CHECKED BY 2 OF 2 1 1 DJH DWG. NO. IR— L- 79OA -2 J r 0 0 D -P W N -' Z O rn tQ m 0 �zvvzx O CD D cn W z 0 M1 (n C D D = z v ° mC cn O 0- U) (1) S D` a -.-1 (n— D W� OOO 0 o co co cD K 59 .0 41 D m (to (rn >z Z :3 W. ,-f 00 cr r� a o , 0 0 �m (D CUL4- 0 D 7 -S CD ° ° Din cn CD ° �• K m � 0 ° = 'In ° 0 c CD CD v1' CD ° N o ° m ° co rn CD c ° 0 s 0' ° cD cn °- CD Z m z 0 o m Z Cn C) D r m j N p m rn � W 0) -n 0 O O O � 9 I r I CD 0 m m m m v W 0 O I v 0 00 z I 0 O O 0 A VA W, co O �ulz D T� m O :fl (n tQ m 0 �zvvzx Z D W x r T1 rn m m CD z 0 M1 (n C D �p z v mC rt m O O m S D` c�* -.-1 �m (n— D W� OOO o O m o z (A 'D co Z. j N p m rn � W 0) -n 0 O O O � 9 I r I CD 0 m m m m v W 0 O I v 0 00 z I 0 O O 0 A VA W, co O �ulz D 00 0 0 r� m r rt T� m O :fl 7 7 a 0 n. K S Q rt tQ m 0 �zvvzx Z D W x r T1 rn m m D z 0 M1 (n C D �p z v mC rt m v cnmDX S D` cn a �m (n— D W� OOO o O m o z (A 'D co Z. K 59 .0 rt O 0 gco0 D�f�DN�Q�O0 m (to (rn >z Z ^ Z �` r� a o , 0 p DZ �m 21 CUL4- 0 D 0 co O, O> r, N ` Q 0 v ,m-, O O Din Z D 4j'�m0� C vp ,Ln W U) R1 K m � PA'►2C--t L [II FEE SIMPLE INTEREST N 00'19'10' E 330.00' 120 THOMAS E. SAMS PATRICIA A. SAMS O.R. 1217, PG. 384 EXHKUT-A N 00'19'10' E 119 THOMAS E. SAMS PATRICIA A. SAMS O.R. 1180, PG. 398 C b W 4 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I o' I I ° `41 I�ol I <I �m I z i� I m I I to I W N e.iLpl 1 _ IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 846 0C UQ l Q mQ m m 0 S 5D m CD c G O m Wit° pC�D 0 �-0, rt � O v p 3 .0- aQ rn to � R- r O O C to 0 o 00 y o -" CD m cn �- (a 00 m 0— 'a 0o O Qo- 9-hs°,CO"� -ti�-,o 2Q D n rn v o PO Co � o c' m Q 0 O" a N 7 fOD N O cn 7, a 0 ClD to Q m COD p �"� N s W 0.= p CQ 0 CD O- .C+ 91 11D J J S O rm+ _.p+ rt 7 Cart- o- CL �- m C7 = tort N m -� 0 MO - Prt0)'^�3O O0ONOOrt O OO(� a�0 m p C) CD z O Q o tOA m m ' 0 (o m Vm m'*-" LIT rt S p CJI 2. r+ N O S -+, O o_ O m _ O .=0Crt�' 040 0000 -tim to s =o to s� ET �° (D 0-0 p Q 7 mm7O CD w CD 2. :3 v Q n N Q �, y m a ..�..� z zi 0 m D 00 0 0 r� m r rt O O 7 7 a 0 n. K S Q rt tQ m 0 �zvvzx rr -Oi. 3 �Q i° a 1 g m m o -mos m < , a, 0 0c ° .0 �p �.. -Q y► m ❑ Q : o 0 m z.. z, m c a In co rt m O_ A O O '1O , CD � m <K O � c7 N �� a►. ,C., 0: S: S O m 0 co �'� m F D D W� OOO Or+ Z N='*�O� K p N N C W K 59 .0 rt O 0 gco0 D�f�DN�Q�O0 :3 =r m � �` r� a ?C .b� o =r z Q, D o M. 'to .1 0 0 -n O �m GiQ.0 Nm rt rtIND O d 0 D 0 co O, O> r, N ` Q 0 v ,m-, O O Din D 0 0� II 3 .+ O ic r 0 .. CD V) CD 0 0 r+ C D CD CA Cn O r+ CD CD O r+ CD C1 -'Iw oU) -I c: CD 0 -I- 1-t- 0 0 CD 3 CD r+ co CD w CD r+ O 0 C1 CD U) r+ C)• 0 0 co 0 h N O Ti m m CU G7 n m D 0 = v C0 � v I � r ' I zo c0 N cu 0 cn F 0 CD 0 c 0 EXHIBIT-A. �Z 0 �I-#- �(D 0 rt 0 < CD 0 0 0 CL CL 3 coo- w I o_ 0 0 0 -* 0 ��• °0 rn W 0- cnno o °c � G7 � J O :< ` CD -o En 0 to ,-r CD 0 Q r+ wN v n0 C o a CD w rn c o 0- ED W n• CA O 0 rn En 0 i i i o W 0 p D m Z m y z IT' )QAZC 4 Z 192, FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 10E N 00'19'10" E 330.00' ,\L< 118 WILLIAM J. CONRAN 0 i PAMELA J. CONRAN O O�R.l 24 0 . PG 240 �n o m O 90 O N LTZ, m O vi O m -P- 00 w O c� m cn rn D O D Z U) D (" — IMMOKALEE ROAD m o�o = 0 N O Ti m m CU G7 n m D 0 = v C0 � v I � r ' I zo c0 N cu 0 cn F 0 CD 0 c 0 EXHIBIT-A. �Z 0 �I-#- �(D 0 rt 0 < CD 0 0 0 CL CL 3 coo- w I o_ 0 0 0 -* 0 ��• °0 rn W 0- cnno o °c � G7 � J O :< ` CD -o En 0 to ,-r CD 0 Q r+ wN v n0 C o a CD w rn c o 0- ED W n• CA O 0 rn En 0 i i i o W 0 p D m Z m y z IT' )QAZC 4 Z 192, FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 10E N 00'19'10" E 330.00' ,\L< 118 WILLIAM J. CONRAN 0 i PAMELA J. CONRAN O O�R.l 24 0 . PG 240 �n o m O 90 O N LTZ, m O vi O m -P- 00 w O c� m cn rn S 02'06'10" W 330.16' 0) En (" — IMMOKALEE ROAD o�o = S. R. 846 o�mm z O m = cn C" m Z O n- O r D OP- m mC ` Z N D O Z m- D s m(n0<r° D cn�m< rn� m D r �n m0z� VJ �cnz° z �� O �.-. U 0 - O D , cn'' Z�mcnnz �( z ;00 c 00 0 v'rl v _ 0 D U1 O I O m mm ��_�i7 z�� °mm .. cLn 00 m U'WWZZ�Z v Cn �+ Z C� yr5 -v Om D -` Z O 00 >m /'rnl �p CCJ„iCp;,V/l1 m O O m �m m vz O O A ° =3 -1.,6 O rn D Q_ = &I CD D O' Z) En Q CD v 0 c CD En En O fi CD -s CD 0 v CO D O r-i* U) o M m co C) D n L x = v S � v I � O O W A MWITW�;t - , FEE SIMPLE INTEREST � w [\) -� z 0 10E CD c Q 0 a- [n co U) 0 CD r+ O �. O v O CD CD Q Q CD Q n. 0 CO 7 En 0 to c °- 3 CD gin' CD cn Q CD co CD "1 Q r+ O' 3 to Q Q_ N 00'19'10" E 330.00' 11 0 0ol 's lo 00 rt O N to hm m0 a2 CL O C d h 7 CD N 0 cr 7 p-1 Z Odn'U0 -0;uO C,D Ln rt N nn [Ar p 0 O z y 3 O rtaO ° � 01) co z EnX' �m co �o o "J co : Z3 -P� -3 W CD N z E�o�D C/l p.Wpmr, DwXM y m D (n W CD n 0- w m' a o CD Z D 3. 0 0 �. CD rn -+, :3 :3 cn fi O o a- jom��a 0 m D Z :3 rn -, rn CD 0 a �. o J : = Z rn n ( co Q O CD to c CD 3 O D rn nn' m �n oo g v a o fi r. c CD CD CD En cn a 0 r+ S 0. CD En N• � C1 (D �o°m°J °m CD S� a O� n fiT ° —mom o mm-4 m o 0-5'O- Z a0' -D° ° xE - ('D Cn o o Who :3 -1 o ° ° C. m �. O --ft C O W FD' p W P�io CAC 0 ~ ° 00 J CF) U) O m �l m m W G7 0 C- r d cD 0 2 m n m a W -C 0 p z O O G7 m M n EXHIBIT- of_L FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IOE N 00'19'10" E 330.00' rn m D 00 E�o�D C/l p.Wpmr, DwXM y rXM� Z O mOZZ7 z a) Z zm <CSv ° �_ D m .- °moo" D D czi�•.�� /` Q_ Z0mC m to Z Z = m� �y Z D m(ai jy ^In ` JVI O0 m Az OD O r O m p"�p O jom��a IO o 0 D Z U) O m �l m m W G7 0 C- r d cD 0 2 m n m a W -C 0 p z O O G7 m M n EXHIBIT- of_L FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IOE N 00'19'10" E 330.00' rn m °wrn m P. C(7, m = 00 E�o�D O p.Wpmr, DwXM y rXM� Z O mOZZ7 z a) Z zm <CSv ° �_ D m .- °moo" co -� D czi�•.�� /` Q_ Z0mC m to Z Z = m� �y IMMOK_ALEE ROAD _ S.R. 846 W Ui O O O N O O o D u) -n /D///��_� E�o�D (TI `L rXM� Z O mOZZ7 w/ �r T Z7 -D � zm <CSv ° �_ D m .- °moo" co -� D czi�•.�� /` Q_ O to Z Z = m� �y m(ai jy ^In ` JVI Z m Az OD O p"�p O jom��a IO o rnm WL ZZ D Z z v m Z J : = Z rn m D oO �� V mac rn O D m m �n oo g a G7 IMMOK_ALEE ROAD _ S.R. 846 W Ui O O O N O O PA -I2C�L 19S^ 10SIMPLE qIT FEE INTEREST EXN� Psi -�.Of p GJ N z n D 2 (n co =r CD I I Q = C p Cn 0 cr p I I Q � n p r. I I 3' cn -n ' Lnn z m CD ��-° = I I tpJ) O 0 a- O 0 o z D w O En CD N p -1 . p I I 1 I p n W 7 m tp O CD C Z O co m (n CAD" Cam- (D Cl- CD V1 N I 0 -f- - -- x p cn o m. I I C � (�D E v ' p�0=CZ. y I I O En ) z C' O CD N CCD �z o?z a_ 0 00 N , I I I I Q � D I o O O w Z V(n�ZCi� I I S O �� oW�N,`�,� >A m O � O rp m M ? I I I I co CD• :3 � ( I I I N 00'19'10" E I 330.00' I 00 tD m W ; C ,t EO�rnn°o�] I O) Ln 1 art I O � _ I o-*icn (-N� I— m'o� o z D p D I 0 0 v,� . ° CD Z7 0 y I Cj C m I 0 0 m o o w 0 0 o m fTl m Z I I o Omoz I CD m m CO 2. z D' z I rn I I I 00, L4 (A z ~ z F ,a (c) a (.0 D Z77 OD w j o �Z�i= o I;I W � �" ��---I I I _ D M c C C/) I�I O (n (f) r I I Or-i* m rn 0 N O m Ti m co C ?] n 2 m O x = v co v I I zo CO 1 � C) PARCEL 195 -- I W c r. N 02'06'10" E 330.16' 0' -n ' Lnn z m ��-° = IMMOKALEE ROAD 0 o z D w _ S.R. 846 X M z Z O co m (n CAD" Cam- - -- -- -- - - -- - m�mC 0 -f- - -- x �DD< x< <rm1 m. m D `2 D Z � rY/Ij I oDmZ.a E v ' p�0=CZ. y ) z C' O D ^� 0 �O �z o?z a_ 0 00 N , O I � D z � o OD m w Z V(n�ZCi� _,r >OZ' w„> Z I O z �� oW�N,`�,� >A m O O m rp m M 2 > .. O G') O 1 :3 p W N �o> [o >� Z r * O m N m O O rn D D7 r-l-- cn W 3 m I I aQ I N 02'06'10" E 330.16' m v &-o G) o 0- En I�MOKALEE ROAD 0 O (D D w x m D N I I I I _ S.R. 846 P Z Q CON2(n CAD- CD '+ O� 7 Z;'mC O w rr O O -- -- -- - -- I I O �� X D/^�� VIr (n � I I D CD a O < ra+oc" ED ((D 0 :1 > �..�� 1 I A�� °a n co 7 (n mtvmiZ ZO..�O o(n 0 0 3 QCs 0 (D O.. �O N I I O (D fA J v - O r+ r+ C (�D I :3 En � I I (On I 1 co p h O 0 I I S � � I I N. aZ (D ° ?�c _—°o mo � �vm N o (b rn p ca m co a , , p M O co �, W co) -O 0 0 77p (D Cn CD 0 rt� vN •p" p �.� Z p.yp Oq �+ c -" ' CD (n � °.o�o -h 0o m 0)`s �m v(D /bp �p 0(D o -� 0oc�o°,�%+Un co :3 =r - 0 S CD CL rn 3� o� s� o :3 m m � 1'::� O = Ti m '0 n D n c" m = v Iu � v r Z o (D rn I I O Ln I O = 1 � D m I � m Z I m Z iz 00 I co I o I I 4h. I I I PA2.C�-,CL )9to FEE SIMPLE INTEREST N 00'19'10" E 330.00' I 114 JOHN A. BOBACK I JULYANN S. BOBACK I L O 832, PG. 1334 O.R. 30.00' 1 D D �o> [o >� O O j r * Z O m N m m O - o PARCEL 196 0 M m O = Ti m '0 n D n c" m = v Iu � v r Z o (D rn I I O Ln I O = 1 � D m I � m Z I m Z iz 00 I co I o I I 4h. I I I PA2.C�-,CL )9to FEE SIMPLE INTEREST N 00'19'10" E 330.00' I 114 JOHN A. BOBACK I JULYANN S. BOBACK I L O 832, PG. 1334 O.R. 30.00' 1 MA w co 0 (n 0 Ul N 0 o -- !: m Cn I WZZ� �'- c0—i —i 3Z 0o D j c" jTj 0WOx,��O �o> [o >� � I X282.48' C) N m m O - o PARCEL 196 rn M m (D W m � ; _ -I L N 02'06'10" E 330.16' m v &-o G) m z-- _ _1 I�MOKALEE ROAD 0 o D w x m D G) _ S.R. 846 P Z Q CON2(n CAD- - -r-- Z;'mC O I -- -- -- -- - -- v D �� X D/^�� VIr (n � D rZm� mOZ,-Oj V/T < ra+oc" co > �..�� 0�/ O A�� °a O mtvmiZ ZO..�O o(n Z >� 0 �O jurn v > FF Is O rr- 46 —DZ J v - O MA w co 0 (n 0 Ul N 0 o -- !: m Cn I WZZ� �'- c0—i —i 3Z 0o D j c" jTj 0WOx,��O �o> [o >� � -O O N m m O O O m N A> � ; v O >v G) O O rt D Q_ = I r CD Z) Cn O Q CD Q c 7 CD O O O rt S CD Cl) n' CD s 0 0 O D o � U) O = m m I m -r n 2 m O A = m 0 =.: :C7 � I r I zo O J EXHMIT p*W_kL_o 917 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST Crl N Z Z Cn O CD 0 cn' CD U) O j. rr O O0 O 0- rt CD CD Q Q CD Q —1. n En 7 En O CD to c Q C CD N' N N . Q r+ CD En CD Q _rt O' 7 N Q Q_ N 00'19'10° E E 330.00' A p -q CD '^ -0310 �C-) �C a a° —mom O r� C n. CD W ClD o 0-57 -0 OZ Z n O O 0 x xa C rt ,a O Z O 0 O Z ap O. O �I O co C O M C/) C O � �' O M --I O � C (AFb*C) Loa O N D � C Q _ L Ln CA CK ;ACK D D > D 334 ; ; o m (A r r G) 0 m rn m 0 N 02'06'10" E 330.16 ii w co O Ln co O rn v 0 10E JEFF C °' m41' - IMMOKALEE _ROAD o �� = S.R. 846 - - — O O o pmm >L4XM D -ph, Z CAN =(n Z'- -- -- -- Z 0 — — — — — — — — m�mc o ----- — — - - -� v (/) -q ;Q D:� m D �m� V/� zm�' sv r '^ O<C D n Z O VIr -D m. mOZ� VIT Zvz= e N,� nv) O /' —//`�� m46> �V! Z O p" p —O Oam�a'?� Ornm� D y° U7 r ��Z o�m O _ L-j Im C4 r� Oo m -4 n�z(i aOz Z I Z v�8 �ma O D OWO ;u V) Aar m o O m P� VI �m : O O a O av N C) o O J J pow2T 19Atec?-t- 19R FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 10E -CID W N Z O 0 m D_ 0 0- uni rn' to Ll 5. O �. co r0-r 0 :3. D .+ La O 0 a- 0 (D -, CD o a to CD 0 �• 0 co 0 0 0 0 CD c0 C �3 CD a- CD (�' N c CD ch < CD < Q 0 0 =r N CD I � o w m CL N 0019'10" E 330.00' A p 21,fD -.�m Q C " 0 lD (n CD a °O –mom o moves - 0 0,z z o o: 0 -0 ° I p ;o y 0 0 W rN, O z p • O N ?r y N (O z D C O O to O O 0 O W CD p U p O N � to O .O'' � c p J 00 N COD v J CD 112 �4 JEFFREY A. RICHARDSON `J, 0. R. 1914, PG. 702 D O Z O f T O� m cn •°o PARCEL 198 0 G7 — - - - O X, O im m N 02'06' 0" E 238.62' N 01'57'15" E 91.52 c � - cz -- — — IMMOKALEE ROAD — �2v(n— = S.R. 846 m 00 - u mM DC4XM A -- O C.;6D- Z� m C O S Q N--n ;Q � C z v D n m D �7CmC V% �[] zo< o c- x D r– z' 0 �r -� `r�iAaC� = o mozX °zC°zx ,. 00 czn, -, a �— O �� °a - O rnto mD v) Z AA Z,- �cnz n oa_�A O O - O �m� —o z�nm' O IO r Ww��Z�Z °a T Z Z J��Z�1'1 >�D z O O OWE ;u (/) Aar m O 0 9: 00 O a a 0 o z° `� N a O G) 0 :j -p- 0 rn D 3 CD o' co Q rn v n r+- c CD En En O fi CD i gin' CD EXH9 T PA0- c 10E PaFEE SIMPLE INTEREST O O O D Z (n D I o I .+� �•C = O — v Irn Ui O M 0 Z a 0 c w O m C) G-) m I 9 I o'er `� N a U) m L4Z M O � .+ O I I r+- o- O O 0 z = o�rnm D C-+ n 7 D I P 1 I CD p ZC:) m (�D CD °, Q I I n O o 0 ca O = m m I V) r I -13 mozu Z. 0� O co I CD gin' CCD m> o z,- TI O I �7 0 0 I O �0)5--u Co CA � I r � 9 pp I m z jU,�z(� J�8ITI,N� I Z ° O a °moo W�� O m I fi i ci CD N 00'19'10" E 330.00' Q � p J O I - I Q I ° ml I � I n o m I Z -, v+ n CD wrn °O co I �' Z I a —m0 CD CL c0 m O o ?I c a O N O 7 z n o I O CJi I OoxQ�� I O a rt O '00 N O O co N � O o CD I OD I Q N CD W rn v I OD CO I C O O O o Ul o° �� 111 D I I NF CD o CA 1 KEVIN M. GROVER m3o.00' --I Co E ; 0. R. 2521, PG. 2463r I I I I O O D D Z (n D Z Cr>- o � � m — v Irn Ui O M 0 Z >o2 O m C) G-) m N m 9 m W rn a U) m L4Z M O a...O c) n °' Co o 0 z = o�rnm D C-+ n 7 D P 1 z O WNJ:w Z C �D� O p ZC:) m o C � M D:� M cn < < C) = m m V) r mozu Z. 0� O co m> o z,- TI O 0 �7 0 0 I O �0)5--u Co CA � I r � 9 pp I m z jU,�z(� J�8ITI,N� I Z ° O a °moo W�� to O m ci N 01'57'15" E 330.13' _ IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 846 M M -v-�.5 N�D� 0E• Cvv Z Cr>- p � ;Arn v Irn Ui O m ,� Z >o2 APA M O A vv N a p O J r CD p N O 7 co Q CD Q rt C 3 CD D7 co O rt CD CD D O r+ CD Q. V) O TI m m Cn G7 L x 2 0 CD I e�i r I z 7 f A C) O m EXHIBIT fD W N Z O 0 Cn M C Q p tOi1 0- 0 in CD Cn rA+ O Q O CT Oh CD CD Q p Q 0 t0 C CD CD Cn CD r+ Cn Q CD co CD p r+ 0 Q Q CL CD En rr n• O 0 CD 7 O C) 0 fOn Q 0 CD 3�p_ O 0 _ O CAD --+150 n -o +. O O = ..#- O CD CCDD fn (�00 :3 C 77 G7 = p `< CD ?1 p m -s CD Q D Co CD � JN n O C O -++ p r* r+ Q =r CA CD (A En =1 -p D N m W m v O m n 0 CD Cn 0 O 7 19AW, L� L 200 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 10E I Gi c rn rn co m CnZ = o�mrn O ycanM y Z m = V) z O C .ND• On�Or0 z0G)V pZrn -+DS m m C m z 0< r° DDm Xcn z° nZ O V�r "DC >� M. � =I OZ < co �,-.� 0 - o D O OD - mtoz 02 (A Z ;mom O Z ,% ° O O —0 Z�� -_� mm O W r ��Z�Z ° fi- � p Cb m v Cr L4 Z (7 D 0 Z ,.. I z �::;5M �Qp > 0 � O W E Lr) (A � D X O m PI m :3 Z G7 D ° S 01'57'15" W 330.13' IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 846 W cn O O O U1 O J —. Cn O °D Z ` C C O 0 V) O TI m m Cn G7 L x 2 0 CD I e�i r I z 7 f A C) O m EXHIBIT fD W N Z O 0 Cn M C Q p tOi1 0- 0 in CD Cn rA+ O Q O CT Oh CD CD Q p Q 0 t0 C CD CD Cn CD r+ Cn Q CD co CD p r+ 0 Q Q CL CD En rr n• O 0 CD 7 O C) 0 fOn Q 0 CD 3�p_ O 0 _ O CAD --+150 n -o +. O O = ..#- O CD CCDD fn (�00 :3 C 77 G7 = p `< CD ?1 p m -s CD Q D Co CD � JN n O C O -++ p r* r+ Q =r CA CD (A En =1 -p D N m W m v O m n 0 CD Cn 0 O 7 19AW, L� L 200 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 10E I Gi c rn rn co m CnZ = o�mrn O ycanM y Z m = V) z O C .ND• On�Or0 z0G)V pZrn -+DS m m C m z 0< r° DDm Xcn z° nZ O V�r "DC >� M. � =I OZ < co �,-.� 0 - o D O OD - mtoz 02 (A Z ;mom O Z ,% ° O O —0 Z�� -_� mm O W r ��Z�Z ° fi- � p Cb m v Cr L4 Z (7 D 0 Z ,.. I z �::;5M �Qp > 0 � O W E Lr) (A � D X O m PI m :3 Z G7 D ° S 01'57'15" W 330.13' IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 846 W cn O O O U1 O J EX powM PA2cir-L- 201 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 10E =) P -I W CD N Z m D_ (n W N�Z� rn 0 0- Cl) w co a . rri�mc << IDInn�_ Oro. > ts � in r+ 0 �. Z (A A S- O (A 0 ' 0 0 a- rn Z � C." :3 cn (D cu � 0 �• 0 Q 0 CA 0 m : L N c (WWZ0 J� ZC7m °• � v�' rn X > � m O z '�— Z rn Dv N O =3 co 0 0 m a C/) 0 rf- O. zr co co • N 00'19'10" E 330.00' Cl) rn a J\ coo C A G7 fD 0 o �c MCD h� CD CD O Z oall —I. � o ;u 0 0 y O O W 00 a °WX"CD m 7 o J w " C O to O V r+ CA O W p 4 i ip 0) A t0 Co o r+ O) A O 4 (O 11-1 _ IMMOKALEE ROAD -n�o � S.R. 846 BCD =_ D — N�Z� Z rri�mc << IDInn�_ m �' Oro. > ts r M (A ' p :L] 0 A > Z (A A S- O O rn �ri> Z � C." y rn� DZm s v O cri (WWZ0 J� ZC7m KF- in 0 >oy 0 L4 4i.. X > � m O z '�— Z Dv N O 0 Z EXHBIT pop—L(DLOUL Z) .p, -% W (D N -' Z 0 O O D 3� wCL0 cn D m 0?ic 70=3 CD N 3 O Z 0 c o m 0Q0 r. 0 Z N 0 0 0 w O OD yc0D o CD 7 J rt N' -Ow C 0 t0 �, CD 00 o W(D 0 WO J U3 O) 0 U1 (0 (D p O 00 N =3 J 00 ai 0 0 ° o' --h CD D -, CD CD 0 ° �. o En n O 7 co 0 0 CD C CD °- m CD CO 0 0 c m :3 (1) 0 CD I En N p r+ 0 p' C (D m � 0 CD s z u0i = d0 mo �om o O O D r�* 3� wCL0 cn D m 0?ic 70=3 mD� A N 3 O Z 0 OQn co, m 0Q0 r. 0 Z N 0 0 0 w O OD yc0D O 7 J rt -Ow C 0 t0 �, O s 00 W(D 0 WO J U3 O) 0 U1 (0 (D p O 00 N J J 00 v s O m m a) -o n � n C- rn = v m � v I C) I zo N O N P,4 2c�-t- 20 Z FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 10E N 00'19'10" E 330.00' D C7 108 o TIM CHERRINGTON N MAX CHERRINGTON J O.R. 2071, PG. 8 #8 O (n - -- ti N N N"I � N, N, N N, C) N 01'57'15" E 330.13' � °c,,m m IMMOKALEE ROAD �v� Z = — _ S.R. 846 _ — o o�Mm Dcl CXM Z -- -- -- -- -- z GJ N 2 (n O C p> D Z�mc v cmi)�1yX m n�6 to ?�< mrn 5 i 5z o RyCv � D mozO 0SE. mf°mD Z ��Z,- 0C; 7 gym O v r! 00 (O O UT O s Ln J W OD o 00 o L4 �>z ;�C � z I z D �om o O O D r�* Z cn D m o 4O�7,fnQp mD� A rq O o m V1 m 21 O m m a) -o n � n C- rn = v m � v I C) I zo N O N P,4 2c�-t- 20 Z FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 10E N 00'19'10" E 330.00' D C7 108 o TIM CHERRINGTON N MAX CHERRINGTON J O.R. 2071, PG. 8 #8 O (n - -- ti N N N"I � N, N, N N, C) N 01'57'15" E 330.13' � °c,,m m IMMOKALEE ROAD �v� Z = — _ S.R. 846 _ — o o�Mm Dcl CXM Z -- -- -- -- -- z GJ N 2 (n O C p> D Z�mc v cmi)�1yX m n�6 to ?�< mrn 5 i 5z o RyCv � D mozO 0SE. mf°mD Z ��Z,- 0C; 7 gym O v r! 00 (O O UT O s Ln J W OD o 00 o L4 �>z ;�C � z I z v��m�m �om O D o 4O�7,fnQp mD� A O O O o m V1 m 21 0 Dv NO � O J X �.� FEE SIMPLE INTEREST l0E :3 O W N O I m D _ can c Q 3 rn co I I I CL 0 0- co in' ( I 3 � CD fi I (D U) O r•r O I I I I N O O O D- O co a I I a 0 m I I CD 3 r•r r+ I I c m I t c� � co N I < 0 I I O � � I 1 CD N N 00'19'10" E 330.00' � o rn �- I I � OI I I OOTT- mf go T m I I p I I ciocfly,. u'rn ?mn �p :[7 N Ica sr w 0 -_ ml o� ,C,D `0 0 "7 3 0�a O z r I I I I Po-or+n Omw W O t0 W r+ Orr � r 0 � C) -9 D Z `i --t p 00 ID O Z O O I Z Crl rt 46 N � O O O I co I C-D c° C) oom . o Z I= I 3 s ° °- s �� -TI Ct n o �o fD 0 O. 3 (n l�D C �rn�� ° : < fTl O� o ?_'O rt° N cn .. m M7 I I n O' •►� CD W n r I V z uNi rr -i m CDD CC CO C/) -u I I r D m I I m m m s� DN --- D DN NO I I o C) ')48 1 C/) I I I O ry* O� m 1.95' I I m O O I N C) O n N 01'57'15" E 330.13' O m m \ W �Wm ROAD rn _ _IMMOKALEE — - o�0 c �_ S.R. 846 o,'a z 0 0 o�mm Dcw X� :� D - Z -- -- -- -- -- -- T- O Z CO N S (n -` O C p D� O I'mc m o �''D'U S D` r � ro- p �_ n m > m m� D 1 v— 'nr ;u -O �Cv "a��P� m o nz O > v`� W Z. -< O _I z°zx _ O C0 rn�m Z Ar3cO> +v v0 O 0O DZ�o ovn o o �nO Ww�_ �g I po m vy,WZ(7� ITI arm 0oz Z N p �,�z. I z m O m O U -P6 x � R v > ;D m o O p W 0 U m 0 m 21 >° O G7 O r pt+k c '�- L 20V F_XMT FEE SIMPLE INTEREST^ IL TRACT "1" GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT 59 I I N 89.33'30" E 27.74' � I I 80' DRAINAGE EASEMENT NOT TO SCALE I I � �N �t 3 N 't C5 COLLIER COUNTY I NIA O.R. 1439, PG. 925 1 ON O POINT OF COMMENCEMENT: Z NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 14 -48 -27 Z �'- NORTH LINE OF SECTION 14 J POINT OF BEGINNING: f � I R= 28,565.89 I I o L= 661.02 Tan = 330.52 I _ A---1'1 9' --- 1 '19' 33" I � 0 I Q 1 OI D! I Lo W 00 �7- rn Lli I Q P PRCEI. 204 o a I Y �M O w .� I �I O 1 cj v o I st N I w � I !n L I I p p O O I Z V) m */ A-zf AVID J. ATT, P .M. (FOR THE FIRM) I S 89'49 55 W FLA. LIC. 0. 5 4 28'01' NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND 1 THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA 74 ACCESS EAS LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER I EMENT SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISoN & I �I TRACT "B" o ASSOCIATES WATERWAYS OF NAPLES u ��INC. D UNIT 7 ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS LL- 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 Lo (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 N FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE SEC /SUB W. 0. N0. DRAWN BY FILE NAME AS NOTED 14/48/27 0014.1 EAW 00- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET FB PG CHECKED BY DWG. NO. 10/01 1 OF 2 DJH IR —L -204 -1 J r Pa• cci Zoq Description: A portion of Sections 11 and 14, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the Northwest Corner of said Section 14; thence South 88'29'48" East, along the Northerly Line of Said Section 14, for a distance of 50.00 feet, to a point on the existing Easterly Right of Way Line of State Road 846 (Immokalee Road) and the POINT OF BEGINNING of the herein described parcel; thence North 00'24'23" West, along the said Easterly Right of Way Line, for a distance of 270.24 feet, to the Southwesterly Corner of Tract 1, Golden Gate Estates Unit 59, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 59, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence North 89'33'30" East, along the Southerly Boundary of said Tract 1, for a distance of 27.74 feet to a point on a circular curve, concave Easterly, whose radius point bears South 88'50'50" East, a distance of 28,565.89 feet therefrom; thence run Southerly, along the arc of said curve to the left, having a radius of 28,565.89 feet, through a central angle of 01'19'33 ", subtended by a chord of 661.00 feet at a bearing of South 00'29'23" West, for an arc length of 661.02 feet to the end of said curve; thence South 01'08'56" West, for a distance of 523.90 feet, to a point on the Northerly Boundary of Tract "B ", Waterways of Naples, Unit Seven, as recorded in Plat Book 36, Pages 72 through Page 78, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; thence South 89'49'55" West, along the Northerly Boundary of said Tract "B "for a distance of 28.01 feet, and to the said Easterly Right of Way, thence North 01'08'56" East, along said Right of Way a distance of 914.59 feet, to the POINT OF BEGINNING; Containing 0.707 acres, more or less. Notes: 1. This is not a survey. 2. Basis of bearing is State Plane Coordinates, Florida East Zone. 3. Subject to easements, reservations and restrictions of record. 4. Not valid without Sheet 1 of 2 depicting Sketch of Description and bearing the original signature and embossed seal of a Florida registered Surveyor and Mapper. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION WILKISON & %%RA INC. M ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS AND PLANNERS 3506 EXCHANGE AVE. NAPLES, FLA. 34104 (941) 643 -2404 FAX NO. (941) 643 -5173 FLORIDA BUSINESS LICENSE NO. LB5770 SCALE I SEC /SUB I W.O. NO. I DRAWN BY I FILE NAME AS NOTED 14/48/271 0014.1 1 EAW 100- 018— OOO.DWG DATE SHEET 10/01 2 OF 2 1II'LIcf FB PG I CHECKED BY DJH DWG. NO. IR —L -204 -2 J f2A ZC i- L. 7-o_5 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST U) O D Z D O r m m I � I C) m 1_ O m m W m 10 � rn m -Lnz p — �"rnz n W O o o�mm = D (A x m y pw-20.013L -,1.0 E :. 00 co O U1 O C4 N 0 m D C) m r N O Cn N 01'57'15" E 33b.1.3' - - IMMOKALEE ROAD_ S. R. 846 - - I n ^l Z D Z CON =(n -- -- C) �-P >- Z mom C �� O o rn TI = DDD (n 0,0. v iv 0 D D rxm� :i7 NO�Co Z. r = m n O aS - — o 00 m0D�] z °zx m z..�� 0�� O ��Q> -< m�cm> o(A Z r��cnA O 0v-ri0 -0 r�P�� DZ Z7 _ O m �WWZZ� r 00 vcn�Z0jri >09 m O > OW�.�mILI) N �C O 00 m (n ,� m 23 z Do G7 O Ul O O O N O O J W N 7- Z I I CD D_ (n W m I a c Q �. v' Cl) in Q 0 6i. I I 3• rt O �. I p v1 rr -w =3 O o a- I I I I CD Q CA n CA � p rn O O to c 1 I CD a CD < � � Q c m •' i 1 I D rn O rn O < u1 fl O 1 I I zy p I I CD co N 00'19'10" E 330.00' i Q cn rn Q- I � I i OI I I 0ooCD 031m �o n I I I I rDEn 3. CD'► CL I 0 -n r s mo95o�Zo I rn l I 1 oQ0-0 U�Z • �� ` L" y y nn mo y o o �-.o Z I °-► d 00 0 -w I --� I o0�cem °.0 4w'' I OI =I 7 CO o I D o0 2.� C m L4 F o rn coi CD I l (D � rtO 106 y ( fZ ALAA A. ELHALWAGY AMINA A. ELJABALY 0 1657, PG. 1625 I iR. D I I F-� I 30.00 U) O D Z D O r m m I � I C) m 1_ O m m W m 10 � rn m -Lnz p — �"rnz n W O o o�mm = D (A x m y pw-20.013L -,1.0 E :. 00 co O U1 O C4 N 0 m D C) m r N O Cn N 01'57'15" E 33b.1.3' - - IMMOKALEE ROAD_ S. R. 846 - - I n ^l Z D Z CON =(n -- -- C) �-P >- Z mom C �� O o rn TI = DDD (n 0,0. v iv 0 D D rxm� :i7 NO�Co Z. r = m n O aS - — o 00 m0D�] z °zx m z..�� 0�� O ��Q> -< m�cm> o(A Z r��cnA O 0v-ri0 -0 r�P�� DZ Z7 _ O m �WWZZ� r 00 vcn�Z0jri >09 m O > OW�.�mILI) N �C O 00 m (n ,� m 23 z Do G7 O Ul O O O N O O J EXHIBIT PArz c � L- 2-0 to pow __a__ Of FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 10E ° -P� rn W N -' Z O 2 D z O ooNZ(n CAD- p m D_ r ; cn W 3sDsyNo =`0. CD 040 0o s rn m Cn -Ti D� O 0 0 0 v' a) n m• D� -_I z O _ o O O N. O r r-i* s O — O DZ co m CD. r+ O —h C7 D �r� o K c°n o 0 cr 5. CD= c N aK F W CJ) 0 3 O 0- 0 o cA*I 23 CD O A S N O.= CD CD M �to 0 N 0 M 0 O p D rn ° ° CD 0 -1. n in D Cl) ° o CD to c CD CD ° ° N or* r+ c C CD =3 m CD CD ° < ° ° o a r +- 0 c� ° CD 0 Ln 0 0 0 N O O j�A_ O O z m O m O O O C7 m m C- x D = v C0 O O I I c� pp I Z I N O O O 0) o C) (n m 0 CA cD mtcWrtz (n m D o �rn�Z o -;h.mM DWXM 2 D z O ooNZ(n CAD- Z o ° 0 _ o 3sDsyNo =`0. CD 040 0o s o m Cn -Ti D� O 0 0 -Z 0 D CU < m• D� -_I z O _ o (A o < z�_cmi)Z O r r-i* s O — O DZ m m =0to r0+� <.j y p 0p j CAD '- Zp m vcn-p�Znm C7 D �r� o K O W -� U, (A !1 m 5. CD= c N aK F W CJ) 0 3 O 0- 0 O O z m O m O O O C7 m m C- x D = v C0 O O I I c� pp I Z I N O O O 0) o C) (n m 0 CA cD mtcWrtz (n m s II 0 0() o �rn�Z o -;h.mM DWXM 2 D z O ooNZ(n CAD- Z o Cn p Z ?mc _ o 3sDsyNo =`0. CD 040 0o s o m Cn -Ti D� � (n 0 CD w E o 7' I a c o_ 3- Z -c•� O-0�.� rO+O� O C m Z0 rt0OpO O -Z 0 ( CU < m• D� -_I z O _ o (A o < z�_cmi)Z �V Z 3 CD 3 O 0 [[T�I — O DZ —'rncoo o Z� C O r�PD� =0to r0+� <.j y p 0p j CAD '- Zp m vcn-p�Znm C7 D �r� o K O W -� U, (A !1 m 5. CD= c N aK F W CJ) 0 3 O 0- 0 N 00'19'10" E 330.00' x O 0 O O T1 0 000 �. -Ti n M0. 00 .0 ;u Z Pmo Qrl OD rnrn �0 DC CO Cf) rm rnrn X C i) --I 01'57'15" E 228.33' 2 S 01'57'15" W 330.13' IMMOKALEE ROAD PIA 00 cD C CT 0 o00) � A 70c O O 0 c O v r r -0 17 0 3 3 0 0_t0 co CD 0 OD 0 U% ( S rn. D CD a o 2. con V7 =-Q- CD rtO i c -Os 0 m Ea -n N G7 0 CD 0 CL 0 pom "% N CL rf a rt 3 CCD t0 j O p m'� W 0 0 -" O O C PD 3 C DOD O 3 0 W O CD s II 0 0() o 0 cD l r+ D � 0 OD o C11J r~ 0 .+ cD -+. co 3 `< t0 m cn — p N CA _ o 3sDsyNo =`0. CD 040 0o s m O o00) � A 70c O O 0 c O v r r -0 17 0 3 3 0 0_t0 co CD 0 OD 0 U% ( S rn. D CD a o 2. con V7 =-Q- CD rtO i c -Os 0 m Ea -n N G7 0 CD 0 CL 0 pom "% N CL rf a rt 3 CCD t0 j O p m'� W 0 0 -" O O C PD 3 C DOD O 3 0 W O CD -' O O cn 0��. Ni�-� rrrt �C�n 3' 3' S cD O jG CD D CD 3 -1 y 3 -h .r W rt 3 0 cD l r+ D � 0 OD o C11J r~ 0 .+ cD -+. co 3 `< t0 3 00- cD o cD Q. 0 L- Cl 3 fD 3 om o y �•r 3 :' N a- cD N N '� � r+ 0 -'+ CD r0+ 0 3sDsyNo =`0. CD 040 0o s S s 0 CD w E o 7' I a c o_ 3- Z -c•� O-0�.� rO+O� O C m Z0 rt0OpO O OEM c d� N O CMZ�G (D Z �O G O O =r o 3 S c 0 c 0 OD in CL oO 0 (A o < c0D O 0 rn =r 0 0 T �,i, (r r0+• 00 a CD 3 CD 3 O �. co O co 0 -_ O m ° cfio AM —'rncoo o Z� C O R1 •� � =0to r0+� <.j y p 0p j CAD '- Zp z a, m a o m r+ i° o� w N Oto � Q °, 0 C7 D �r� o CT ryi• .,N.�. 3- 0 % 0 .l-r O CD N N rr 0 O_ co K �° -eh 0 m OZ A c•O , a CD CO rr3 0 CT C) (D O D 1 -'_G W CD CO 0 f1 q 5. CD= c N aK F W CJ) 0 3 O 0- 0 N y O 0 O N cA*I 23 art' —: to -oi� Q OD O o O? CD co .. cD S 's O r+ O A S N O.= CD CD M �to 0 N 0 M 0 O p D 0 CD o00) � A 70c O O 0 c O v r r -0 17 0 3 3 0 0_t0 co CD 0 OD 0 U% ( S rn. D CD a o 2. con V7 =-Q- CD rtO i c -Os 0 m Ea -n N G7 0 CD 0 CL 0 pom "% N CL rf a rt 3 CCD t0 j O p m'� 7 G EXHIBIT Q -P� -' W Q N Z O V) O --A-' U) n r- O m D 't- W m d = • C Q G7 m (n 0 v" (1) (� Q Q C. � O (n. -h Q Cl) O 0 cr O _ O Q (D CD Q Q (n ( Q -1, n (n Q O Q O Q to c CD a CD 5i' CD .D `< c C Q ° co CD Q co c o O r+ Q cn f Q ° CD 0 C- r a N O J co O p o -V Z O O � v 2 � m m X m v a, C O O v p ?) � � r G7 W m z I z O O K: m O C) PA9CC- L 2-0-7- FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 10E J VU LV JV YY 'hJ.J/ IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 846 L4 M x O "D -1 OD St rn 0 O - a N'o O -1 OD * O_ � � Co -n jUYZ m � Oa � (DD � p aO D2.: a W A: i 4- �3' m Ev0)- n �rtO Z= m (O c,p j o .m+0O �o W 0 �. ;u 0) Z = [0 O �n m _ rt0 V (OD 0 D S _ m COO () a (p t0 D (n O (mj rt `c O Q "V�j n 0 Z y C N 7rt rt Z X. C) ?O O c ,5:E;' � O rt p (N�D< �� C 0. > 7 0. (b N COOa -mi 0()- (a -.0 O(OD z 1G � (A1 — Ci -� . 0 (�1 0 ,0 m p a w a � � m o � � � C�OZO V!r oCn� o o o cND� i°•c p s cr am ZD� Z-ZS �_-« m rtrtNO rt< .�..0 m mrt�mA (ZI) 0/—/ O Cr�o =.0,O � (=D O) A .7'm S aN -O•.(n VOrt) N M in Z V I Z m D_ O D, • 0 rt C (p O C O j CCD CJI C C (A Ov v O � U1f�C �O.(°A �ssm_^•rt jo jpv� o 0 0 WW. c A comr o W�co�aX�r mo m Cn I c,aZZT� E SQ Nam �o o=3r,zm - S y o �� P Z� m �� yZ A 0 p a 7 (,, C'_ � r�i 7 0 0 0 7 .0+ -n 0 -1 m rr nn -{ p W , V I M D f*1 BCD rt N m C O V 7' � (OD fD O y (OD � O� (�D O En �fl m �A M m p 0 N O m ��K O 0� O Zn O O Or C rt �+ a 0 d 0 rr D m S 7 O N 3 -OL4a 0 OD mCO 0o O o rt O 0 0 0 c v0 O O O O N m Srt m to m o CD (7 O O O O 0 O N -1 O 1 Ort o O 0 o c f rt y Cr y < CD m A 6- O o m o. h CL 0 d rt m m CD C 7 0 03 r: v CD y n v 0 D O Or-i* V) O --A-' U) n r- 0 O TI U) m G7 m m --i w c 0 0 C- r a N O J co O p o -V Z O O � v 2 � m m X m v a, C O O v p ?) � � r G7 W m z I z O O K: m O C) PA9CC- L 2-0-7- FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 10E J VU LV JV YY 'hJ.J/ IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 846 L4 M x O "D -1 OD St rn 0 O - a N'o O -1 OD * O_ � � Co -n jUYZ m � Oa � (DD � p aO D2.: a W A: i 4- �3' m Ev0)- n �rtO Z= m (O c,p j o .m+0O �o W 0 �. ;u 0) Z = [0 O �n m _ rt0 V (OD 0 D S _ m COO () a (p t0 D (n O (mj rt `c O Q "V�j n 0 Z y C N 7rt rt Z X. C) ?O O c ,5:E;' � O rt p (N�D< �� C 0. > 7 0. (b N COOa -mi 0()- (a -.0 O(OD z 1G � (A1 — Ci -� . 0 (�1 0 ,0 m p a w a � � m o � � � C�OZO V!r oCn� o o o cND� i°•c p s cr am ZD� Z-ZS �_-« m rtrtNO rt< .�..0 m mrt�mA (ZI) 0/—/ O Cr�o =.0,O � (=D O) A .7'm S aN -O•.(n VOrt) N M in Z V I Z m D_ O D, • 0 rt C (p O C O j CCD CJI C C (A Ov v O � U1f�C �O.(°A �ssm_^•rt jo jpv� o 0 0 WW. c A comr o W�co�aX�r mo m Cn I c,aZZT� E SQ Nam �o o=3r,zm - S y o �� P Z� m �� yZ A 0 p a 7 (,, C'_ � r�i 7 0 0 0 7 .0+ -n 0 -1 m rr nn -{ p W , V I M D f*1 BCD rt N m C O V 7' � (OD fD O y (OD � O� (�D O En �fl m �A M m p 0 N O m ��K O 0� O Zn O O Or C rt �+ a 0 d 0 rr D m S 7 O N 3 -OL4a 0 OD mCO 0o O o rt O 0 0 0 c v0 O O O O N m Srt m to m o CD (7 O O O O 0 O N -1 O 1 Ort o O 0 o c f rt y Cr y < CD m A 6- O o m o. h CL 0 d rt m m CD C 7 0 03 r: v CD y n v 0 EXHIBIT P t R c E t- 20 9 � FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 10E r :3 � -1 W N 7- z O Dwnm M p D z m D con (n OD U) rn m'PrnC A-DD'D< D� UC11 o D D Z D v cn gin' O m a CD u) 0V/ �. M -- 0) N fi O M. co (A DZ Cn I Wz uv'�ZM Z, cn o 0 o 0 - Ln O o' o D v n °n ° 0 0 M I. c rn 0 CO =3 N ° O CD (° c rn CL � m ° cn C) c � fi D � m rn < U) ° 0 0 r zr ,- O 0) cn' a z m ao co 0 Cn O Ln O O O N O O 0 C- M I N O 00 -'1 1 O m O O z O � O 0 M M D m O W O O OD z l0 O O O 0 M A Cl) M z D M N 00'19' 10" IO D U) m IZ --1 c' 120 w ARMANDO A. LAMBERT ALGIS L. MADOS O.R. 2628, PG. 0620 Z D W ONo r- O W Ln o" � 30.00' a S 00'20'50" W 330.00' IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 4 LnZ m D 0 -Pm M Dwnm M D z C: C: D cn U) O m'PrnC A-DD'D< D� UC11 o D D Z D O O m o u) 0V/ M -- 0) 0 co (A DZ Cn I Wz uv'�ZM O m MD� m Ln O pm 21 D v n p D O m M I. rl w 00 0 C- M I N O 00 -'1 1 O m O O z O � O 0 M M D m O W O O OD z l0 O O O 0 M A Cl) M z D M N 00'19' 10" IO D U) m IZ --1 c' 120 w ARMANDO A. LAMBERT ALGIS L. MADOS O.R. 2628, PG. 0620 Z D W ONo r- O W Ln o" � 30.00' a S 00'20'50" W 330.00' IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 4 LnZ m 0 -Pm M Dwnm M D z C: C: D D U) m'PrnC A-DD'D< D� UC11 o D xITGi rZ (A �— � zm-i• o cno <C �A> u) 0V/ Z± -Ti 0 -- 0) 50 co (A DZ Cn I Wz uv'�ZM ;D y �•°nj OW MD� m Ln U)9? �f]� pm 21 D v p D Gmi c.%� ° 3 o N n 0 o 0 rt Q rt O S � 7 z�� =r O �p�000�jN7'a O < C,J . 0 N m 0 0�=' BOO O tCnO �� =*o O ° O 7'' C.) O P° Ln° cu rt 41 7 O. CD O N � (D 00 cr O O rt z C 0 0 0 O n O p 0 `" ' O =r-- 'o ° Cnn � a�i °moo qo 0 0 ° �� a "o "z c N)Ln u'. rto M O N (0y So _ =N O flD `oos 0 ° � a � a , 5:0 8 cl) � o -, 000(�D rt� w K w 0 P (n . < LA O_ O O n M C y = 0 01 C, A N Z j 0 f�D (�D 0 a O c ,� ,� W j O O O fp rt a 7 a o. a �p O (' A A 3O° mc. o,,,.cD�°�a° -� C O O W Q c 0 d n 1 00 T O Q 00 7' .O-r K -P Cn <I F9 ZI (mil .. 00 1 co Q U Q cn cn w io V 3 -0 cD m rt '' o W W p °0 �0 hZo :3 A C : O a 0, 0 d CD l N cop A rt d CD N3 0.0-0. gyp' O O O 0 M O 0 a, h 0 o O � N O 0, m a0 m O h cy a° 0_ y a m 0 A O J EXH T 1�A Q c� L 2 0"7 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST 10E �. 0 - (D W N OZ 1 1 rn D (n ca CD I I d = • C o (n 0 v' I I O CD co rAr 0 I I O r+ 0 I I cn 0 0 Q I (D CD o 0 0 0 to C I I 3 I I CD CD fn CD -p :3 �G cn C CD r I I En I (D CD co cn p r-r I I O p' I I =r I N 0019'10" E 330.00' En rn i o CD °- i I I � I p 00 °gym I j rt 0 CD N d Q ;00 rn o cr 5, -0 I I an-0 Z O I m 1 P rno Z yCo)oo 0 ry+O I z l 00 o p f/1 7r C I 1 O 3 o JCO I Q I O 7 fD O L4D m Cn -1 Lo OD 0 i I r Cll Z o to I w fTl ( W Ln > > 9 I I D r I I JUAN B. ARIZMENDI I I O.R. 1289, PG. 1967 m FA co � 30.00' 0 0. F D I I O M ° r 1 m 1 � w 0 N ') m O = rOTI n TI m W c N 00'20'50" E 330.00' ova - IMMOKALE_E ROAD o-'o 0 0 -p, m m o S.R. 846 0 >(I nM D z co a: n Z -- - -I -- C O COZ' �- -- -- -- -- mp,mC O _ �DD< /�//��_ N cCj�o A M Xm VI im-1. v m D = m D nz p Nr ®22�0c- O M, 0 \ /O Z mo�� r- T D Z [5 0 r �m O �7 O co �N m v ;�Zn� ->0o'z Z Z -+ > N O O K �Ga�P'U,(A M >X m O p m PM :3 O �Z s >° p O o a r =, .}- o r+ CD D Q= 0�1 i rn 0' cn 0 rn v Q r* c rn co w 0 r+ s co i co -1 W rn 10 r+ �• c 0 rn 0 0 �CD �o 0 cn 0 rn �3 aCD r+ CD U) rn 0 rt Q a w 0 0 v Q 0 r* EXH T P.A < ( cr L Z A v pqp_U FEE SIMPLE INTEREST s in' M 0 e+ 0 c co — 0,110 J0 0 10� rn cnc��o'� a 0+� n ran c °,o ~'�� O h C 0c`� Z 3K O 5 0 rnCD n.0 m w 0 -03,=3 � Z O 0 _s C `O cps (p 0 �• rt N p 0 lb N O ;u 0 r . p 0 rt N 0 0 V x— 93 M N w ? 7 i0 0 O C: 0 CD rt O = T1 m rn CU O n S D n = rn 0 CD � v I � r ' I z N I p O OR A;- r+ m Pi C) Ln O rn M n (D W c0 pip Z O (7 Z ° O DWXI*1 z c0 N S V Z O N as Z - Q M Mc �� O v (n �l D X Mn D D 'M �r MZA� o n 0 V/ ENO <c -< z..� O� ONZ °--x. mCDwm> v — Zc: y r — m � „ $ a ( o Zn � ° O ,o D o Z o L* a ZZ� Cn am Co m v� �IIZ -M- a o D ° > W°I(/) o m �� ma� m o 0> � M z c u 4 c C c C c U IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 846 l0E N 00'1910" E 410.00' • • • • • J D �i 0 o D ^ U) i n D m M 0 O = T1 m rn CU O n S D n = rn 0 CD � v I � r ' I z N I p O OR A;- r+ m Pi C) Ln O rn M n (D W c0 pip Z O (7 Z ° O DWXI*1 z c0 N S V Z O N as Z - Q M Mc �� O v (n �l D X Mn D D 'M �r MZA� o n 0 V/ ENO <c -< z..� O� ONZ °--x. mCDwm> v — Zc: y r — m � „ $ a ( o Zn � ° O ,o D o Z o L* a ZZ� Cn am Co m v� �IIZ -M- a o D ° > W°I(/) o m �� ma� m o 0> � M z c u 4 c C c C c U IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 846 l0E N 00'1910" E 410.00' • • • • • J Fe :3 -;- O rI.- CD D Q = CD Z) N O' CD 0 rn v Q c CD cn cn O CDs rn EXHIBU -A-- PA g c� L- z r r A �' ppp _$..L, FEE SIMPLE INTEREST mCrtOpOfDN O rt0 n0 rnM 0�1c rn00-5, -O OK z oa0 -0 �o oo y o 0 rt 0 -- O p Ea . , C _ W N O.0 C O O O rt M �(D 0 W O cn N La OD o Ln O (O N r r 0 m 0 Lo C: 0 N n v w cn 0 rn O m 0 O c. 0 D CD O rn CD 0 0 n. 0 0 M 0 7 Lo co c 3 � C<D - o z.: rn O p � O rn � W U- S> DZ ZZ� 0 rn cn I W Jcn jZ. o' Z O m 0 CL mCrtOpOfDN O rt0 n0 rnM 0�1c rn00-5, -O OK z oa0 -0 �o oo y o 0 rt 0 -- O p Ea . , C _ W N O.0 C O O O rt M �(D 0 W O cn N La OD o Ln O (O N r r 0 U) O = mTI rn v O n m o L X 2 m Q1 L N o 0M- C) G7 m D O o es O �O D rm* U) Z O0 V) D m O o • m z O co"M c Z C .,;i > 0 U) O = mTI rn v O n m o L X 2 m Q1 L N o 0M- C) G7 m m O to Co x rn -t cWnz m 2 n O o • >CAXM D z O co"M c Z C .,;i > v rn�mC rn �� cny� to M. X �..�� O_ O z.: O O p � O o -� � W U- S> DZ ZZ� 00 rn cn I W Jcn jZ. Z O m C� G N 00'1910" E 330.00' I OE C�z v Orno s U) 0 < � p C v v� C - - g2z v z � 0D Ay �9"� +ii► �NI v D p Z -_0 •�'7 D A D ; m Pm 23 M v v D IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 846 • • • • • • J r c Q D � W N m Z O CD V) CJ D m z 0 CD D (n Co —j rn a= c ° v >v O O fi 0- Cl) in' A� (A CL (gyp �. � r �. � p �. ov�z 0(A 0 0 0 U) O 0 v' 0 ,+ _DO C4. O cD � (AZ M 0 -1. ° U) (D 0 to 0 N 0 O (D t° c CD 3 o- -1 5 CD rn fi r+ c m ° En m m co a ° 0 0 0 cn N• ° d 0 o mmmomm* jv 0 C D O W 0 ,; m w4 n ran P 0 a°mc'' —r a oy�,I< =r 0 CD 0 CD fD rt ,x+10 Jy Z oCD 5•col 0 C oi11 5•0 7 �"'CD U1 0 � (D 00 O bC 0 ID e CD 0 00 O• M 0 fD r'+ Ort 'o W N 7=r 0 0 0 y Q 0 rt rt S N cL CD m S O . 3 CD j O m m M m 0 C- :C7 I r I N -t p W O 6) n 2 m m A D m v W O O 1 o O z I O O O O D G7 W co W ci, z D m O o Oo o �? (A � V) CJ D m z o m D Z P a O O m m M m 0 C- :C7 I r I N -t p W O 6) n 2 m m A D m v W O O 1 o O z I O O O O D G7 W co W ci, z v m v4Cn` v ` > O q * Oo o �? n = z o o-p�mm > WXm D Z P WNS( � pZ- O Z D v >v O O v D m�mc cnmy;Q � rn < A� (A mw rn Z O� Oz � r co Lz,) � p O ov�z 0(A Z ,, rn � _DO C4. m � (AZ M K O L4 W ..p. m L,) PA le- c' L 711 EXHOITL, FEE SIMPLE INTEREST popes N 00'19'10" E 330.00' S.R. 846 _ m0 > v v4Cn` v ` > O q * p z Ul O ' m o4� `� >O O n D *z > m > O �m v >v O O J O 'P. (D C4 N O CD D Q = (n c W p rn w 0 N d O N' m CCDD r� w 0 O D N O p a- 0 o' D w -, CD CD 0 CD o D. Q —' on = c 0 O a c CAD CD N CCDD _0 `< O m�� 0� OZ c � m CD CD C;� a ° O O + r+ 0 CD 0 N prp L4 - 5>- r � o rn w Z M --J: ZM CD a I O Z > p Rol; R nO m (=D a7 SAM CD =CD CD 0 - p G)`C I m0��rp+��0 � cD CTC� Z o a� Imo IoW v0, 0 0 cor. ,,o CD r7+ a p CD O p N 77 C r � (D CD 7. O -,1 I- - S 0 co co o OD C e N p p r+ N O s s PA-4c�- L 7-1 2. FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 846 EX�ffj D co /\ m m —cnz Ovc n N O m p o Z Or�* ?� O m O --j O —' m v C- a m D D rZ �� O m O m m. �A --I O m�� 0� OZ O m m m m C;� PA-4c�- L 7-1 2. FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 846 EX�ffj N 00'19'10" E 150.00' r � Z ° mm -q. 5 v pL n LO > °-( a o in v ° Z W °T so aqZ A a m �m ; Az D ° O Ut O O O N O O .10E J `° co /\ m m —cnz Ovc n m p o Z o�mm = _0 ?� Z Dcw n� y W N 2 (n Z O O c 4h. m m c rTi U) M A cn �m v C- M N m D D rZ �� o O m m. �A --I W m�� 0� OZ Zvi ° O O T1 O O� prp L4 - 5>- r . rn w Z M --J: ZM N I O Z > Ow�M �� 00 m N N � C) N 00'19'10" E 150.00' r � Z ° mm -q. 5 v pL n LO > °-( a o in v ° Z W °T so aqZ A a m �m ; Az D ° O Ut O O O N O O .10E J O -P O r+ cu D 0- = J CD o' D Q co v Q r+ c N 0 rt rn co CD 1 f� N CA N r+ W -i _`. O Q 3 0 0- CO (1) �. 0 O r+ O �. rr O O a O CD O Q Q (D Q 0 ( 7 En 0 3 to c ° CD c gin' <n r+ rn U) rn Q rt o' 1 CD Q a a coo 3 c)zsjo go,000 m 8 S 5 ° CO S fD 00 r*mavo *� 3� -1 OR N O 0':3 col � . . O . y o o co CD O p !A 7C C 0 C 0 rr r (I1 : �. 02- = -U r* v (DoofiCD 0o m La N N O O U) O = M m m 0o O m 0 x 2 0 o :C7 0 I chi r I Zo N_ .. -. O r+ m cry pl+fZ,ccr-L -Zl'l FEE SIMPLE INTEREST EX T- Pq�ojj 10E IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 846 G7 m D M � O <DQOD- coo W O p U) T` m en >oZ 'Ja Z D O o O� m ��,z DWnM r—i* = —� O m D Z _. z 0 0 U) O = M m m 0o O m 0 x 2 0 o :C7 0 I chi r I Zo N_ .. -. O r+ m cry pl+fZ,ccr-L -Zl'l FEE SIMPLE INTEREST EX T- Pq�ojj 10E IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 846 G7 m rnnrn v N 0 > n M � O <DQOD- coo W cowm '- -cnz p U) T` m en >oZ 'Ja 0-n> M> m 71 9 o o o ��,z DWnM N = —� O D Z _. z 0 co M V) C Z O - m�mc U)-n < D D::�, m 0 D Z. �r T .{ ZOD� m to Zv(no �VOI z O O O TI pr '� prp C4 . Z 0 0- m u'�wz v j� Z9 M O m D 0 -5 rnnrn v N 0 > n z °z >� O <DQOD- AvC4-' p 'n en >oZ 'Ja 0-n> M> m 71 9 o ;0� A v> v N O O N 00'19'10" E 180.00' !I PA-2 C S C Z 1 S EXi FEE SIMPLE INTEREST ftee :3 ;P -1 W N -' Z rn CD D cn � m Q = c o cn 0 v' w En a CD 3. � _. CD cn ° = - - -- -- -- -- - -- �0 o ° CD IMMOKALEE ROAD -, CD o a (n 0 En (n — — — — — C' ° CD i°_ S.R. 846 r+ � D N 00'16'30" E 330.00' Q C o 0 cn CD rn Q) a O D O r' 0 C7 C CD (n m r i o CD CL cn n o °. m fD�sov�n N`<fDrnaCCD� O ?IC a7 moC7 5O -1Z n a ° p o rn W O C- > O D z O w n C— n w y n n M o O 0 O D :i7 �3 °000 �m co �7 ��0 D �� o a n o _ C) c� N n o �•0 -410I Nmm o �m� w W m� La o; o co iv D CA o D cal _ J C) n -p C) n v rn � CD G7 = � cn Oro G7 Or � can �, U, w — I m o r r— r r— 00 Z Cl Z Z O m _ z cn z cn W Z cn cn C- N Z7 00 O mrn °.s Na<Cv v�C0� :—St� z °z= A2p�ppp 0EnC W Ao zmm i>v_' (0) -n - 'Doz a �DE! A -rn n :3 0 0 v D O cn O O O N O O N 00'19'10" E 330.00' f�- J D m�Lnz m �v � Z n O m O o = o�mrn D o !' O m r� � coNmm z- D C m C:) O 0 G) cn U) mc cn m X >:E to m m m O �zm �r O M m I mrn °.s Na<Cv v�C0� :—St� z °z= A2p�ppp 0EnC W Ao zmm i>v_' (0) -n - 'Doz a �DE! A -rn n :3 0 0 v D O cn O O O N O O N 00'19'10" E 330.00' f�- J co m�Lnz m �v � Z n m O o = o�mrn !' acw xm y Z -. z p coNmm z- D C C:) O v mc cn m X >:E to m m a �zm �r C- = m o D I O mOz� T tmD ^ �(n Z ` l Z v O O O O o � � mWZ oo m Ln�nm �Z z I O z y -J : , M Ov;,V, R N p m W-P� L O D mrn °.s Na<Cv v�C0� :—St� z °z= A2p�ppp 0EnC W Ao zmm i>v_' (0) -n - 'Doz a �DE! A -rn n :3 0 0 v D O cn O O O N O O N 00'19'10" E 330.00' f�- J EXH 61T..�.. ��i2 c � c. 2-lb Psi FEE SIMPLE INTEREST t , 11 0 O O j D 1 0 W N N 0z I I CD QD fi �•c o CD ai I 0 0- cn gin' I Q �. rn -� ao,c -4 o �. �CD n 0 �. 150.00' �c m = rn O O m cn O 0 a ° N o ° ° IMMOKALEE ROAD Z 0 CD :' cn — CD a < S.R. 846 Q ��ZD7 °o �000,, o N 00'16'30" E 150.00' r o w n CD Z > o =3 cn X- o CD cn rn I z n m ° n cn o c0i�Z. �o< ° W N �' ". 0 fi p0�� . O 0 01 :� % D C 0 0 V n m � 0 E rn C) rD-$• j r u)' cn G-) D oho o C o >0 m m 0) 11 0 O O j D m coo 0m Z w Z as - *; r�+ O m rn -� ao,c -4 o rn 0 150.00' �c m = rn O O m m \ o CL m 1-i� Z cn Z O Z O �oXortow m = w OD 0 Q ��ZD7 °o �000,, Oy o D r o (a ° , n Z > ° D n N D X- o - P m z z n m ° n o j2.o X, - �port�p m c0i�Z. �o< ° W N �' ". O P p0�� . O 0 01 :� % D� L-4 _ V 0 E rn C) rD-$• j r D cn G-) D oho o Oro o >0 m m I �> rn O O 0 O � -i _ zZ a r-Tr� DZ �N� �0 C/) I w �Z,�(1j v�� o> z A co a —a J D Z j r�+ O m rn 0 150.00' = rn O O m m \ cn m ±cnz �v rn Z m = a) 0 0o.;�mm > 64xm D Z D c� Z GN=U) C/) o Z' m r' rrn c 1y� � N 00'19'10° E 150.00' 0 z n m ° n �mD'� " `- mE2 � c0i�Z. �o< ° = O m0D.ZO7 �� aZVZ� n co z (f) 0— O rD-$• j O Z�NZ ^f/► Z,- `JV/ Z o >0 O O 0 O � -i _ r-Tr� DZ �N� cn O p I rn �Z,�(1j v�� o> z A Z O ID O �1 Dc m O O j � o m im C D v v O G7 - O a —a J Q p C4 N z Z O CD co t0 mo2 0 Z O rn D_ O o o -N mm D CA n CD a n v' w ov iX,CDm Ef) Cn LK Q I Q. P 02.�h� �. to OD r ?. Cp � I J J r o I O to r4 O O a- O I O Cn I Cn � CD N �m O A Y p I O -i CD Q Q Cn CD Q �• N O.R. 2451, PG. 2288 0 En 7 Q I � p O CD in C CD CD N CAD Z3 Q fn Q �- rt c =3 En CD CD n En (n Q O 0 r-r p CD co � Q Q CD n o °. 3 � ° m � c En rnfiroO 0 N : a o m z 3"< W 1 -Damrt-u O M C 3 �p -A co t0 mo2 0 Z o o O o o -N mm D CA n y j 0 c w O n Q rnlI ov iX,CDm Ef) Cn LK J `' I Sc O P 02.�h� 0 to OD r v CD Q Cp � I J J rn I �_ c) N w O m p m m per-2C �_ I- z __ FEE SIMPLE INTEREST N 00'19'10" E 330.00' EXHMIT p a 0 rl_� = 10E I I � D I� � W 1 (10 > O O > M Z O-i m o o -N mm D CA n rn � m rnlI 0 z c) N w O m p m m per-2C �_ I- z __ FEE SIMPLE INTEREST N 00'19'10" E 330.00' EXHMIT p a 0 rl_� = 10E I I � i I II I I� � W 1 m > I O � o o -N mm D CA n < I � m rnlI .Zm) Z WN =Cn O z Z I I I M I I 0 z II r -, C) N p Cp � I I 0 O I O II Ip D � I I Cn I Cn � I N �m O A Y p I � I 116 O I m JULIA SHELLY 30.00' I I N O.R. 2451, PG. 2288 I v I 1 I I � N 00'20'50" E 330.00' 1 IMMOKALEE ROAD S.R. 846 cn O O O N O O I I J_— J 0 m W 000 C (� o"O� n 0) z = C_ m > �///�� Z�'�' o nOZO VV II (— = °�p� CE) o o o -N mm D CA n M. D� X � zOz 0- O >� < z .Zm) Z WN =Cn O �� m�mD 0(/) Z AA��. Z��p `J o _n 0 O CAD- (1) 0 0 0 r -, C) N p cn O O O N O O I I J_— J 0 m p > z m C: m Lt) -Ti X �� (n C z�v tn�C<< C_ m > �///�� Z�'�' o nOZO VV II (— = °�p� 0 m M. D� X � zOz 0- O >� < �� m�mD 0(/) Z AA��. Z��p `J o _n 0 O 0 0 0 r >_(C Co W. Z m m m' J j Z. vo> A zCO O Ip D 0-,j A m >� m V/ j J O o m N �m O A Y O 000 „ G7 cn O O O N O O I I J_— J P tee C �- L- 2-18 EXHIBIT FEE SIMPLE INTEREST p%p 10E :O :P - W N 0z I i CD n D (D I �= C 0 r+ v CF) En d 0 CD �. �. �- 0 �. :3 r'' — -- -- -- -- -- -- - (n 0 0 � -- CD Q ° ° IMMOKALEE ROAD 0 ch = C6 ° 0 3 c° C - — — — — S. R. 84 CD v < N 00'16'30" 180.00' cn 0 0 - -- -- -- - w - rn o :3 Cl) o \7 co CD n to p � � x m c n m ° r m a 00 00-h 00 mm ufD,�s °05�0i r'rna:3 CD�� CD rn 0 *—n 0 CD co�z z o Q Vim° ;, 0 0 z T CD ° 0ow �u --:j `° 0 0 vi =ao�rno 0D D r Q o o CL 0 ra -{ � N �7 0o D N D �7 : n 0 �: o v 3 0 �° C i -< m D -I N -� o 3� m N Z? W r s to a co 0 o fi a N fD C7 0 G7 r D cn G7 D � -nn Cl) rn o 0r m r 0 �D j, rr N -< m —K ZZ 0-) 0007 (/) W co 0 C3�z�v A0• S D P p> 1 0 D O D OCD r�* ---1 m D o D ADS m m z m D r� yy vDV 0 S G7 0 m 0 m � wm m:tcnz m W 0 m = DC XM y -' z P co N 2 (n z a (n OZ _ � m mc (n�<< M m D r r� U) Ci = o � z O (A rnoz� co z Z (A Z O r Z> O 0 °` p � Z 0W �z DO Z I p m Ln J z M j j N O I O z o W _;_ //^Qp j 00 m Cn C3�z�v A0• S v �3!> P p> 1 0 A D o(gL4 . zv m''' O D o D ADS m m z -� O O r� yy vDV N O O 180.00' N 00'19'10" E 180.00' J O 0 a 0 0 m m�r►oa N cD rt !A rt(?D -.j O < r O`G rt� O m a0 um � . ;a0 co 0 L 0 00 0 rt 0 0 0 0 0 fi a O y (D N p W 7CCrtCD p. O O tm n1 Cn-10. O co p v f� 0 p CA J 0 y fi D CJI CY? O Crl IV W O N m D � cn co j a— D (� p 0a- a- Co co a . z O . � . M ° O =3 S2 o o 0 o o' m�mC �� cn m cn rn En :3 -, m a o co CD 0 �. O� O n (n :3 cn a O m tn c CD CD I CD -v m v0 -Nzn ---j r z ° I CO y i o ;u rr //�� (Q�0 W�(Ln,v,A j O m fi ° CD w L CD m co c o 0 0 s CD cn � o E CD O 0 a 0 0 m m�r►oa N cD rt !A rt(?D -.j O < r O`G rt� O m a0 um � . ;a0 co 0 L 0 00 0 rt 0 0 0 0 0 fi a O y (D N p W 7CCrtCD p. O O tm n1 Cn-10. O co p v f� 0 p CA J 0 y fi D CJI CY? O z O CD PAP, c i- t.._ 219 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IMMOKALEE ROAD „ S.R. 846 N 0016 30 I E 180.00 D W m � (Yi z m �v0) Z a D (� p p Z D oO� z O MN =cn Z C -NZ- ° M ° m 0 0 m�mC �� cn m cn C- = En D cn O m W O� O m M z O CD PAP, c i- t.._ 219 FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IMMOKALEE ROAD „ S.R. 846 N 0016 30 I E 180.00 r_�z�v mm�. 5 v 22>nC- 600' n �z z3; �g0 W ;a ro raj � N >oZ a m >� m rl rrn p> 0 0 a N 00.19'10" E 180.00' W �I • • • • J Cn W m � (Yi z m �v0) Z a a) o� p p m m = Dwxm D z O MN =cn Z C -NZ- ° ° 0 m�mC �� cn m cn C- = N o D z O /nr moz;u W O� < rn�m> Z Z"`� ° n O O O r prp Wz I c� _D co m v0 -Nzn ---j r z ° I CO y i o ;u rr //�� (Q�0 W�(Ln,v,A j O m ° L O r_�z�v mm�. 5 v 22>nC- 600' n �z z3; �g0 W ;a ro raj � N >oZ a m >� m rl rrn p> 0 0 a N 00.19'10" E 180.00' W �I • • • • J Z) .p -I W CD N W z (A L4 D 't r rn D_ W 3 m CU 0 w D N N co C .p D - O a 0 CD m 150.00' -9- 0 �. 0 CD z D (o m� 46 N D cn 0 0 vi War 0— o �° �' O' O (D � _ < =3 -, CD 0 0 ,p Vi cn !D N n C) c cr,_ rn00 CTI CO = 00 mm CTI N N �1 CO p p 0 CD tn c I0 CD a CD I rn 10 .l D p p ;u nn L4 -N (/) 0 V/ N O o m (n O I♦ �i i c m CD rn m < a fi o' fi T 7 (D n E � Q En °- CD 00 0 = ° ,ctoo rn a o dm rn- vrt�L- W, h 0 0 CD Eo0 `< an 0 C cD p° r.0 CO o mSO o 0 0000 (D ° 0 N E , rtp� O oocn o o ° c"'� CD p o CD rtmo (n�SEr A 7° cow O C moo CL x- co (D = f y v ° O � V) O m O m m FEE SIMPLE INTEREST I I -- -- �- -- -- -- IMMOKALEE ROAD PE.Xo.H.�.d� ".OE S.R. 846 D W cowm x m =cn z m (/3 L4 D �"�z n C-) D CU m r Z D N N O� C .p D - O rF* m 150.00' 0 O- O K: 0 .70�X O � V) O m O m m FEE SIMPLE INTEREST I I -- -- �- -- -- -- IMMOKALEE ROAD PE.Xo.H.�.d� ".OE m�-4. 5 zp<ro 00 EQZX <a�°N'- y �zv,� vTm v °> ;a m P m Az D� O • • • • • N 0019'10" E 150.00' J S.R. 846 N 00'16'30" E 15 .00' W cowm x m =cn z m L4 D �"�z n C-) CU m r o�mm DwnM D N N O C .p D - O 150.00' 0 O- O K: z .70�X z D (o m� 46 N D N X 0 C'j > 0 vi War 0— o �° �' �D QYI �' O 00 —I �, � _ < �D� ��> D G7r � Ln Cn Dz ,p Vi 6 N n C) c cr,_ rn00 CTI CO = 00 mm CTI N N �1 CO p D A " Z Co � W m�-4. 5 zp<ro 00 EQZX <a�°N'- y �zv,� vTm v °> ;a m P m Az D� O • • • • • N 0019'10" E 150.00' J CD W cowm x m =cn z m �"�z n CU C) o�mm DwnM D G7 O C .p D - m N m C O Dn � O _ n m ° D Zn < r m� vii = m p n�ZO 'O Z. D� �� W m u O� OZ / ^ Zvi l J VOI O O O Ornm �1 o p D A " Z Co � W r I0 m v Ln � Z;7 m I z o 10 .l D p p ;u nn L4 -N (/) 0 V/ N O o m (n O I♦ �i i m�-4. 5 zp<ro 00 EQZX <a�°N'- y �zv,� vTm v °> ;a m P m Az D� O • • • • • N 0019'10" E 150.00' J O En G7 m O m m I D c IQAk c 5- L 2- Z I EX FRO En O O D FEE SIMPLE INTEREST D r-i* m pa" D 4h- O W CD O -. 4'. 0 rn D a- (n m •c ° cn O wN=cn c�aD- 0 fi a- in' - p O N . - -- - _ -- -- -- _ -- -- 3 N 0 co O o o ° m o IMMOKALEE ROAD noZO o O — — - 0 CD° CD 0 D ^ (n ZvQ S.R. 846 Q 0 CD t° -1 O N 00'16'30 E 150.00'_ CD CD vi CD - -- -- co m -4 cn�ZO m I z O O D O �I 0;u W�'(n N N ° �n o m � � io c CD X O W CD G7 0 (n < r- O Q ' N j =r (D 0 N c• CD °' a 00 00510 00 -hc) 0 0 �m 7 S � CD St Q G7 3 �a�, C-° a =J z D Z OD m0crZ) 0 p D OD �0 `O -1h. U LL u w Q rt O. oo m _, to 0 m U, D � O u, 0 w° p D p o �- Z 0 fn 3 0 CCD1 a �` `DC x.71 s co D � rn .. D� o°° c - :. <D --► oop rn rn `°n°cn�-" G7>> V C) ca o s Z Z p - 0O c� o (1) 4, 0 to W = = � J � � Z rn o 00 m m � C � C7 m m O En G7 m O m m I D c 0 En O O D O D r-i* m o m -. 4'. 0 O En G7 m O m m O E 0U > Q DOCn* 20z= °a yO pp Q N C WA � con � v m >02 a mad m �m M v a 150. W U7 O O O N O O 150. T J I Ul c mjcnz 5"O0 n z = o�mm -Ti 0 o -. 4'. D cj X M D Z O wN=cn c�aD- 0 z4�mCcQ 0 _ > m (n — ° m o noZO O Z• D( m m , Z OV/ < 0 D ^ (n ZvQ O o —0 I O'n -u > z i co m -4 cn�ZO m I z O O D O �I 0;u W�'(n N N O O m .3 io G7 O E 0U > Q DOCn* 20z= °a yO pp Q N C WA � con � v m >02 a mad m �m M v a 150. W U7 O O O N O O 150. T J L 2 2 Z EXHIBIT FEE SIMPLE INTEREST Pagf�.ot OE :3 O -P6 -1 W N (D Z O rn Q— D (n �(n C �•� o CD cn - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 0 CD `� �, IMMOKALEE ROAD CD co =3 — 7 CA o o ° S.R. 846 � o ° CD Q N 00. 16'30" E 180.00' N O n cn =3 co 0 (D L C - -- -- -- -- -- CD ° CD vi m oD D r+ r+ n c CD co r- CD O N N CCn p O � fi 0 1 180.00' CD co � o cn cD �- o no cz v 0= —ho oU) D O �- z oD .fi wag -.o � z o a ? -1 _ D Z O o -'O Ln ° mc �� o- cr • Z O° MbpD �-< < C-4 > m N r (n c C7 P p �� cl) " '� o° O< D �' o° Z rn 00 D rn om 0 o J rn Ul o°° �.o � -o�cn G7 D D �` Z cn G) m v o'er ' -h '�-"O Z Z o ° coos omoo�m = mm �7 JC Z L4 N 0000 N (n �C7 CD am rn o m m 1 a- D O > Z a O r- --A 0 U = y / En m (7) 0 m � CD ° ca m rn4�cnZ m z = N 00'19'10" E 180.00' amo 0 - o-p.rnm 1 P Dwxm y O Z CN2(n C p O D- m�MC O C) cn m M >:�� cn C ,� Z D rn m < M D m< D Z• o V/ �1 Zo o � o�>0� = p f*1. (Ar —I ZoZS n C -c ��-o� O—/^ � °>< O -C rn�mD 0(/) Z >o°° 0 ZO�� _O oA6i�' �a -, o DZy Co (A - �Z-- -rn CTl O I r- a c� � Gb m -I cn � Z (7 �7'I ��! �b o � z fV O I z J�,m� �p O °(,+r1 �„ �DA m O N O m O rJ m 0 D ;o N ° .. O > G) O J 10F MEMORANDUM DATE: February 25, 2002 TO: Board of County Commissioners 'ACC: Thomas W. 011iff, County Manager FROM: Fred W. Coyle Commissioner, District 4 RE: Growth Management Attached is a document, which I prepared to guide me during "discussions with the media, homeowner associations and others to whom I have been invited to speak. It recounts some of the problems inherited by the current BCC and describes the many positive actions taken during the past year to resolve the problems. It also includes some of my recommendations for future action. Because the effects of growth seem to be of greatest concern at the present time, I have focused primarily on that issue. There are many other major problems addressed and resolved by the Board in the past (landfill, sewer, etc.) that deserve mention. I have made a number of recommendations concerning the revision of our Land Development Code (LDC) and the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Some of these are important enough to merit immediate consideration; however, a comprehensive review of the LDC is essential if we are to manage growth effectively. I would like to get Board support to direct staff to begin such a review. Consideration might be given to establishing a Committee consisting of representatives with the requisite knowledge and interest to make recommendations concerning changes. If we are to regain the confidence of the voters, I believe we must make the public aware of the many good things being done by Collier County Government. I wouldappreciate any additions/corrections to the attached document. Fred W. Coyle Commissioner, District 4 FWC:vgr Attachment Fred Co vle Collier County Commissioner - District 4 We are confronted with a wide range of problems in our community which are the result of many years of poor planning, bad decision - making and a failure to anticipate the effects of rapid growth. These problems, largely inherited by the current Board Of County Commissioners, have caused a loss of confidence in our Iocal government which complicates the process of recovery. Additional funding sources are not likely because voters feel we have not spent their tax dollars wisely in the past. We are now faced with the challenge of recovering from past infrastructure deficits at the same time we must build future capacity... and we must find a way to do this without additional taxes. I believe we can achieve our goals, but we must manage more effectively and make some difficult choices. FUNDING. During the past three months, the Board of County Commissioners has reduced the annual County budget by approximately $20 million. In addition, by bonding our gas tax revenue and a portion of sales taxes, we have been able to finance most of our road construction budget for the next 5 years. If the growth in tax revenues continues to increase at the same rates as in the past, I hope we will be able to continue financing our road building projects without any increase in property taxes. SMART GROWTH. Our community has been characterized as one engaged in a battle between growth and no -growth proponents. This is not only an inaccurate characterization, it is a disservice to our community. Polarization causes problems... it does not solve them. If we wish to maintain a high quality of life in Collier County, wed growth is the only option. We must also recognize that as long as Collier County remains a desirable place to live, there will always be more people who want to come here. This will, no doubt, result in higher land and home values which create both benefits and challenges. In many cases, managed growth can help solve some of the problems we face today. Take traffic for instance. If we had only one library in downtown Naples to serve the entire county, people who wanted to use the library would have to drive there, creating more traffic in downtown Naples. Similarly, if people have to leave their neighborhoods and drive to another neighborhood to`shop, work, go to a movie or restaurant, they are creating traffic loads on our streets. By building shopping centers, grocery stores, restaurants and offices at well- planned locations throughout the county, we could distribute the traffic loads and create greater convenience for our residents. 02118102 ,. 1OF In most cases, the free market economy assures that businesses and homes are built where there is a perceived need. It is when these decisions become excessively speculative that the process breaks down and the infrastructure fails. We can help prevent unhealthy speculation by requiring that developers more specifically define potential uses for their projects prior to rezoning or PUD approval. This can be accomplished in a way which retains reasonable flexibility to respond to changes in market demands. In the Rural Fringe, environmentalists and property owners have been able to reach compromises which protect environmentally sensitive land while recognizing private property rights. This is an excellent example of how reasonable people, working together, can find solutions to difficult problems. The accomplishments in the Rural Fringe should serve as an example for "smart growth" throughout the County. CHANGE THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) AND THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDCI. These are the rules which form the basis for the decisions made by County staff and elected officials. In many cases, these rules are poorly written and do not provide the foundation for effective growth management. If we want to assure well- managed growth which is consistent with the quality of life we desire, the rules must be changed. Changes to the rules must be devised in a way which will recognize the private property rights of landowners, developers and neighbors alike. There are two important criteria which we should consider: • PREDICTABILITY. Uncertainty is the cause of much of the controversy surrounding growth. Residents are uncertain about the effects new developments would have upon their property values and their neighborhoods. On the other hand, developers have a right to use their property in a way which is consistent with the rules ... they want some certainty too. The rules we establish should provide the predictability necessary to protect the private property rights of all parties involved. • CONSISTENCY. The rules should be applied in a consistent manner. Constantly changing rules or subjective application of rules only adds to uncertainty. No one likes trying to hit a moving target. Changing the rules now will not undo the problems caused by past decisions, but it can certainly reduce the possibility of similar failures in the future. Below is a brief summary of the actions proposed or already implemented to assure the GMP and the LDC are effective tools in managing future growth. 02118102 1OF -3- 1. There was no requirement to analyze or track the cumulative traffic loads created by multiple developments, consequently, by the time the impacts were recognized, it was too late. We are now implementing a checkbook accounting process which will permit us to account for the cumulative effects upon our infrastructure and restrict further development until the infrastructure is available. This checkbook process will also provide some certainty to property owners who might want to develop their property. 2. In the past, the traffic impact of a proposed development has been determined by consultants employed by the developer. The County staff reviews the traffic analysis; however this process raises questions concerning the validity of the traffic studies. I recommend the process be changed to require the County staff (with the help of a consultant when necessary) to perform the traffic analysis. Any costs could be covered by a reasonable fee charged to the developer. 3. The LDC permitted a developer to pay impact fees in advance and receive a guarantee of public facilities availability before the development plan was submitted. This created a planning nightmare. There were few specific details available concerning the type, intensity, and even the location, yet the County Government was committed to provide whatever was necessary. This provision has been removed from the code and replaced with a stipulation that public facilities availability will not be guaranteed until after the review of the detailed site plan. 4. The County's policy permitted developers to obtain guarantees for access points into streets and road at the time of conceptual approval, when there is little information concerning the actual uses of the property and the traffic patterns. This created situations which ultimately interfere with the efficient movement of traffic on our roads. This policy has been changed so that access points will be established a the time of detailed site plan approval. 02118/02 l OF -4- 5. Level of Service Standards for our roadways are specified in the Growth Management--Plan (GMP). By state statute, this plan can only be updated twice a year. This does not provide sufficient flexibility to respond to the rapid changes we are experiencing in Collier County. This LOS standards will be referenced in a separate document which will permit County Government to respond more quickly as development and traffic patterns change. 6. There are a large number of Planned Unit Development (PUD's) which were approved in the past which have not begun. These PUD's were previously reviewed every five years. Because of the rapid changes taking place in our County, it is essential that we have more current information concerning the potential impact of these developments. A proposal is under review to change the review period from 5 years to 3 years. This will permit us to more accurately forecast future infrastructure requirements. An added benefit is that many approved developments never develop to the maximum density allowed. As developers respond to changing market demands, they frequently find their projects can be more successful with lower densities. A more frequent PUD review cycle will help us manage growth more effectively. 7. Many developments in the past have not connected residential and business components. Thus, traffic must enter main roads to travel between the residential and business components. This places an added traffic burden on our major roads and reduces throughput. Changes to the LDC will require interconnectivity to permit the flow of traffic between residential and business components of developments without entering major roads. 02118/02 4 1OF 8. Members of the public have complained that they were not given adequate notice of proposed zoning changes. Public input is essential to the managed growth concept. A new public participation procedure requires public meetings before the submission of rezoning petitions and additional notification in the form of signage, newspaper ads, public meeting notification and notice by the County Government upon receipt of an application. 9. County policy has permitted staff to administratively approve certain changes in permitted uses. This has resulted in public controversy and great expense to the County. I recommend that our policy be changed to prohibit the staff from issuing any zoning or permitted use changes. Because developers need some flexibility to make reasonable changes in order to respond to market demand, I recommend that a simple and inexpensive procedure be implemented to assure any changes to permitted uses be reviewed by staff and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. This should be accomplished in a manner which does not subject the entire development to review or change. IMPACT FEES. There is a general agreement throughout the community that growth should pay for growth. Impact fees should be established at a level which represents the cost of developing the required infrastructure. Because impact fees are normally paid at the time building permits are issued, the receipt of funds always lags behind the need for infrastructure development. Furthermore, because of the rapid escalation in property values we have experienced in recent years, impact fees collected last year are not sufficient to purchase property rights of way for future road or utility construction. To compound this problem even further, impact fees were not updated for many years and, in some cases, impact fees were not collected. Consequently, no new roads or water /sewer capacity were constructed despite dramatic growth. This created an almost insurmountable problem which will take years to overcome. In an effort to correct this problem, the following action has been taken. 02118102 b i of 1. Water /sewer impact fees and rates have been increased dramatically in order to provide these essential services to our ,growing population. Based on the experience of other communities with similar fee structures, we expect to reduce water consumption by as much as 25% during the next few years. 2. An aggressive effort was undertaken to collect all past due impact fees. 3. In order to manage this process more effectively, more than 25 different - impact fee ordinances have been consolidated into a single, consistent document. 4. Road impact fees were increased last year and are currently under review pending another adjustment. RECOVER CAPACITY ON EXISTING ROADS. Because of poor design and excessive growth, many of our existing roads are not permitting traffic to move as efficiently as possible. Traffic in left turn lanes frequently backs up to the extent it blocks through traffic lanes. The short spacing between access points on busy streets causes traffic to stop frequently, creating potentially dangerous situations. Traffic lights at some busy intersections such as Airport and Golden Gate cause major delays during peak hours. Gridlock occurs regularly at some locations when inconsiderate drivers block intersections. In order to increase the capacity of our existing roads, the following actions are being taken: 1. An automated signal system is being installed on some of our busiest roads. This will permit the timing and control of signals to optimize traffic flow. 2. Left turn lanes will be lengthened where possible to reduce conflicts with through traffic. 3. Some access points and median cuts will be closed if they present safety or traffic flow difficulties. 4. A grade separation (overpass) is under consideration for Airport and Golden Gate Parkway in order to permit traffic to flaw more efficiently on these busy roads. 02/18102 1 O 5. Road widening plans for Collier Boulevard, Goodlette Road north of Pine Ridge, County -Barn and Immokalee Road ,will improve traffic flow substantially. 6. More aggressive enforcement of traffic laws would improve traffic flow. BUILD NEW ROADS. The County does not have a well defined road grid which would permit the efficient flow of traffic; consequently, traffic is channeled into just a few North /South and East/West roads which have become overcrowded. This situation has been exacerbated by new construction on these roads which has resulted in major traffic delays. Fortunately, much of this new construction will be completed soon and our existing roads will be able to more easily handle current traffic volumes. But more roads must be built if we are to avoid traffic gridlock in the future. Our current plans include the completion of the Livingston Road extension and the extension of Santa Barbara Boulevard to Rattlesnake hammock Road. Despite the many problems confronting our community, great progress has already been made and more is yet to come. Immediate results should not be expected ... the problems have accrued over a number of years and time will be necessary to resolve them. No doubt there will be some mis- steps, but the Collier County Government is now on the right path. We are determined to regain the confidence of our community. 02/18102 l OG RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 126 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, OPPOSING LEGISLATION TO RESCIND THE EMINENT DOMAIN AUTHORITY OF COLLIER COUNTY OR TO OTHERWISE RESTRICT OR LIMIT COLLIER COUNTY JURISDICTION OVER LOCAL WATER AND WASTEWATER UTILITIES WHEREAS, in response to the request of the citizens of Collier County, on February 26, 1996, the County assumed regulatory jurisdiction over the investor -owned water and wastewater utilities operating in the County; and WHEREAS, the Collier County Community Development Operations Department, Utility Regulation Element, has actively and rapidly responded to the needs of investor -owned utilities and their customers since the County assumed regulatory jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the quality of service to investor -owned utilities and their customers has greatly improved since the County assumed local regulatory jurisdiction; and WHEREAS, the right of eminent domain is a necessary and required right of County government to ensure the provision of safe, efficient and sufficient water and wastewater service to County residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, in regular meeting held this 20h day of February 2002 as follows: 1. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County opposes any legislation which would diminish the jurisdiction of Collier County over local investor -owned water and wastewater utilities operating within the County. 2. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County opposes legislation to take away or in any manner diminish the eminent domain authority of the County over water and wastewater utilities which it regulates. 3. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County requests that Collier County's local legislative delegation actively oppose any legislation which would affect Collier County's authority to regulate investor -owned utilities or take away or diminish the County's eminent domain power over any water or wastewater utility it regulates. This Resolution shall become effective immediately upon its adoption. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAM .�D RQCK, CLERK may: yerk Approved ; ; as t `form and leg4 , sufficiency: David C. Weigel County Attorney 10H `,�. DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 1, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Dot North Regional Water Treatment Plan! Well Field Expansion DESIGN -BUILD AGREEMENT March 1, 2002 j ,� Co e-r County I Ocr .I DESIGN -BUILD AGREEMENT between Collier County Florida and Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. dated February 26 2002 i� DESIGN -BUILD AGREEMENT This Agreement is made this26tWay of February 2002 between Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, (hereinafter called "DBC ") and Collier County Florida (hereinafter called the "Owner. ") 1. DBC'S SERVICES AND RESPONSIBILITIES l . l DBC shall perform, or arrange for the performance of those architectural, engineering, procurement and construction, start -up, testing and training services ( "the Work ") necessary in connection with the design and construction of the Owner's project (the "Project ") as described in Exhibit A - Project Scope and Services, and this Article 1. 1.2 Design Professional Services 1.2.1 DBC shall, consistent with applicable state licensing requirements, provide through qualified, licensed design professionals employed by DBC, or procured from qualified, independent licensed design consultants, the necessary design services, including architectural, engineering and other design professional services, for the preparation of the required drawings, specifications and other design submittals to permit DBC to complete the Work as described in Exhibit A- Project Scope and Services, and this Article 1. -- 12.2 The standard of care for all design professional services performed by or arranged by DBC shall be consistent with that degree of skill and care ordinarily exercised by members of the design profession practicing under similar circumstances and in the same or similar locality. 12.3 DBC and Owner shall agree upon any interim design submissions that Owner may wish to review, including design criteria, drawings, diagrams and specifications setting forth in the Project requirements. DBC and Owner shall meet and confer about the submissions and, following the meeting, Owner shall review and approve the interim design submissions. 12.4 On the basis of the approved interim design submissions, DBC shall prepare Contract Documents showing the scope, extent and character of the construction to be performed by DBC. 1.2.5 DBC shall provide such descriptions and data as are required for obtaining approvals, permits, licenses, etc., of such governmental authorities having jurisdiction to review or approve the final design of the Project, as noted in the Scope of Work. 1.3 Construction Services 1.3.1 DBC shall provide to itself or duly licensed and qualified subcontractors the necessary supervision, labor, inspection, testing, start -up, material, equipment, machinery, temporary utilities and other temporary facilities to permit DBC to complete construction of the Project consistent with the Contract Documents and as described in Exhibit A- Project Scope and Services, and this Article 1. 1.3.2 DBC shall be solely responsible for the means, methods, techniques, sequences and procedures employed for the provision of the Work. DBC shall be responsible for the completion of the Work in compliance with the Contract Documents and shall keep Owner advised as to the progress of the Work. 133 DBC shall coordinate the activities of all Subcontractors. If Owner performs other work on the Project or at the site with separate contractors under Owner's control, DBC agrees to reasonably cooperate and coordinate its activities with those of such separate contractors so that the Project can be completed in an orderly and coordinated manner without unreasonable disruption. 1.3.4 DBC shall keep the site reasonably free from debris, trash and construction wastes to permit DBC to perform its construction services efficiently, safely and without interfering with the use of adjacent land areas. Upon Substantial Completion of the Work, or a portion of the Work. DBC shall remove all debris, trash, construction wastes, materials, equipment, machinery and tools arising from the Work or applicable portions thereof to permit Owner to occupy the Project or a portion of the Project for its intended use. 1.3.5 DBC shall be solely responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work. DBC shall take all reasonable precautions for the safety of, and shall provide the reasonable protection to prevent damage, injury or loss to: a. All persons on the site or who may be affected by the Work; h. All Work and materials and equipment to be incorporated therein, whether in storage on or off the site; and C. Other property at the site or adjacent thereto, including trees, shrubs, lawns, walks, pavements, roadways, structures, utilities and underground facilities not designated for removal, relocation or replacement in the course of construction. 13.6 DBC shall comply with applicable laws and regulations of any public body having jurisdiction for safety of persons or property or to protect them from damage, injury or loss; and shall erect and maintain all necessary safeguards for such safety and protection. DBC's duties and responsibilities for safety and for protection of the construction shall continue until such time as all the Work is completed. 2. OWNER'S RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 Owner shall provide DBC with an accurate description of the site where the Work is to be performed and will furnish DBC with all available information, i.e., the physical characteristics, legal limitations and utility limitations at the site. Owner will be responsible for establishing test or boring locations. 2.2 Owner will provide for or arrange for a right of entry to DBC, its agents, staff, or subcontractors, for the purpose of performing and with the right to perform all acts, studies, and research including, without limitation, the making of tests and evaluations, pursuant to the agreed Work. 105. Subject to applicable law, Owner will provide DBC, its employees and subcontractors, reasonable access to the site. 2.3 Owner shall be under no legal restraint or order that may prohibit DBC from performing any of the Work. 2.4 Owner shall designate in writing to DBC, prior to the commencement of the Work, a representative who shall be fully acquainted with the Work and who has authority on behalf of Owner to approve changes in the scope of the Work, approve any daily reports submitted by DBC, render decisions promptly, and furnish information expeditiously and in time to meet the time schedule for completion of the Work. 2.5 Owner recognizes that DBC's Services may unavoidably alter the existing site conditions and affect the environment in the area being studied. 2.6 Owner shall notify DBC of any known health or safety hazard existing on or near the site where Work is to be or is being performed by DBC or its subcontractors, with particular reference to utilities and hazardous substances or conditions. 2.7 Owner shall provide DBC with all relevant data and information in its possession relating to the site, the Work and the environmental, geologic and geotechnical conditions of the site and surrounding area and the location of subsurface structures, such as pipes, tanks, cables and ►.rtilities as known to Owner. 2.8 Owner shall, within seven (7) days of occurrence of any event hereinafter described, give DBC written notice of any suspected failure of DBC to adhere to either the contract terms or the standard of care described herein. 2.9 Owner shall be responsible for acquiring certain permits that are part of the Work, as noted in the Scope of Work, Exhibit A. 3. INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 3.1 DBC shall at its own expense, carry and maintain insurance coverage as follows: 3.1.1 Workers' Compensation as required by the state where the Work is to be performed including Employer's Liability; Commercial General Liability including Contractual Liability and Explosion, Collapse and Underground, Comprehensive Automobile Liability, including Owned, Non -owned and Hired Vehicles. 3.1.2 Limits of Liability Provided: (a) Workers' Compensation in the statutory limits of Florida Statutes, Chapter 440 and all Federal Government Statutory Limits and Requirements. Policy must include Employers Liability with a limit of $1,000,000 each accident. b) Commercial General Liability: 10ir Bodily injury - $1,000,000 per person, $1,000,000 each occurrence. Property damage - $1,000,000 per occurrence; Annual aggregate for all claims of $2,000,000. C) Automobile Liability - Combined Single Limit $1,000,000. d) Excess Umbrella - $ 1,000,000. e) Professional Errors and Omissions - $1,000,000 per claim. 3.2 The Owner shall procure and maintain property insurance upon the entire Project to the full insurable value of the Project. The property insurance obtained by Owner shall, at a minimum, insure against the perils of fire and extended coverage, theft, vandalism, malicious mischief, collapse, flood, earthquake, debris removal and other perils or causes of loss as called for in the Contract Documents 3.3 Owner and DBC. waive against each other and Owner's separate contractors, Design Consultant, Subcontractors, agents and employees of each and all of them, all damages covered by property insurance provided herein, except such rights as they may have to the proceeds of such insurance. DBC and Owner shall, where appropriate, require similar waivers of subrogation from Owner's separate contractors, Design Consultants and Subcontractors and shall require each of them to include similar waivers in their contracts. 3.4 The Owner shall be responsible for purchasing and maintaining, its own liability insurance. 4. INDEMNIFICATION 4.1 DBC, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall indemnify and hold harmless Owner, its officers, directors, employees and agents from and against claims, losses, damages, liabilities, including attorneys' fees and expenses, for bodily injury, sickness or death, and property damage or destruction (other than to the Work itself) to the extent caused by the negligent acts or omissions of DBC, its Design Consultants, and its Subcontractors, anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. 4.2 Owner, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall indemnify and hold harmless DBC, its officers, directors, employees and agents from and against claims, losses, damages, liabilities, including attorneys' fees and expenses, for bodily injury, sickness or death, and property damage or destruction (other than to the Work itself) to the extent caused by the negligent acts or omissions of Owner, its Design Consultants, and its Subcontractors, anyone employed directly or indirectly by any of them or anyone for whose acts any of them may be liable. 5. CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, LIMIT OF LIABILITY Neither DBC nor the Owner shall be liable to the other for incidental or consequential damages, whether arising in contract, tort (including negligence), statute or strict liability. DBC's total liability for any and all claims arising out of this Agreement or out of any goods or services furnished under this Agreement, whether based in contract, negligence, strict liability, agency, warranty, trespass, or any other theory of liability, shall be limited to the value of the total compensation received by DBC from the Owner under this Agreement. 1.7.7` 6. LAWS AND REGULATIONS 6.1 DBC will comply with applicable federal, state and local laws and regulations. 6.2 DBC agrees to comply with Executive Order 11246 relating to Equal Employment Opportunity, certifies that it does not and will not maintain segregated facilities or permit work at such facilities, will file Standard Form annually and will comply with Executive Orders 10625, 11701 and 1175 8 when applicable. 7. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR DBC is an independent contractor and the detailed means, manner and method of performing the Work are under the sole control of DBC or its subcontractor(s). 8. PAYMENT TERMS 8.1 DBC proposes to perform the Work under this Agreement for a lump sum fee of $4,303,196.00. Of this sum the Owner has already authorized the sum of $330,000, which leaves a balance of $3,973,196.00 to be authorized to DBC. Payment terms for this sum are described in 8.2 below. 8.2 Monthly Progress Payments 8.2.1 Prior to submitting its first monthly Application for Payment, DBC shall submit to Owner, for review and approval, a schedule of values based upon the Contract Price, listing the major elements of the Work and the dollar value for each element. After its approval by the Owner, this schedule of values shall be used as the basis for the DBC's monthly Applications for Payment. This schedule shall be updated and submitted each month to the Owner along with a completed copy of the Application for Payment form signed by the DBC's authorized representative and attached to the Agreement as Exhibit B. 8.2.2 Prior to submitting its first monthly Application for Payment, DBC shall submit to the Owner a complete list of all its proposed subcontractors and material -men, showing the work and materials involved and the dollar amount of each proposed subcontract and purchase order. The first Application for Payment shall be submitted no earlier than thirty (30) days after the Commencement Date. 8.2.3 If payment is requested on the basis of materials and equipment not incorporated into the Project, but delivered and suitably stored at the site or at another location agreed to by the Owner in writing, the Application for Payment shall also be accompanied by a bill of sale, invoice or other documentation. 8.2.4 DBC shall submit six (6) copies of its monthly Application for Payment to the Owner. Within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of each Application for Payment, the Owner shall either: DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) (1) indicate its approval of the requested payment; (2) indicate its approval of only a portion of the requested payment, stating in writing its contractual basis therefore; or (3) return the Application for Payment to the DBC indicating, in writing, the reason for refusing to approve payment. Payments of proper invoices shall be processed in accordance with Section 218.70, F.S. and the administrative procedures established by the County's Purchasing and Finance Departments respectively. In the event of a total denial and return of the Application for Payment by the Owner, the DBC may make the necessary corrections and re- submit the Application for Payment. The Owner shall, within thirty (30) calendar days after Owner approval of an Application for Payment, pay the DBC the amounts so approved. If any payment is not paid when due, such payment will bear interest thereon from the date such payment was due to the date of payment. Interest shall be paid at the rate equal to the Prime Rate as published daily in the Wall Street Journal. .8.2.5 Owner shall retain ten percent (10 %) of the gross amount of each monthly payment request or ten percent (10 %) of the portion thereof approved for payment, whichever is less. Fifty percent (50 %) of the retainage shall be released upon substantial completion and the remaining 50% shall be released when the final payment is due, unless otherwise agreed to by the Owner. The Owner shall have the discretion to establish, in writing, a schedule to periodically reduce the percentage of cumulative retainage held through out the course of the project. 8.2.6 Monthly payments to the DBC shall in no way imply approval or acceptance of DBC's work. 8.2.7 Each Application for Payment, subsequent to the first pay application, shall be accompanied by a Release and Affidavit, in the form attached as Exhibit C, showing that all materials, labor, equipment and other bills associated with that portion of the Work payment is being requested on have been paid in full. For all payments subsequent to the first payment, the Owner shall not be required to make payment until and unless these affidavits are furnished by the DBC. 8.2.8 DBC agrees and understands that funding limitations exist and that the expenditure of funds must be spread over the duration of the Project at regular intervals based on the Contract Amount and Progress Schedule. Accordingly, prior to submitting its first monthly Application for Payment, DBC shall prepare and submit for Owner's review and approval, a detailed Project Funding Schedule, which shall be updated as necessary and approved by Owner to reflect approved adjustments to the Contract Amount and Contract Time. No voluntary acceleration or early completion of the Work shall modify the time of payments to The DBC as set forth in the approved Project Funding Schedule. 8.2.9 Prior to release of final payment and final retainage, the DBC's Representative and the Owner shall jointly complete the Final Payment Checklist, a representative copy of which is enclosed in the agreement and labeled Exhibit G. 8.3 Payments Withheld -- 8.3.1 The Owner may decline to approve any Application for Payment, or portions thereof, because of evidence or inspections that reveal non - compliance with the contract documents. The Owner may nullify the whole or any part of any approval for payment DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 7 104r. % -- previously issued and Owner may withhold any payments otherwise due Contractor under this Agreement, to such extent as may be necessary in the Owner's reasonable opinion to protect it from loss because of any of the following: (a) defective Work not remedied; (b) third party claims actually filed for which DBC is required to indemnify Owner; (c) failure of Contractor to make payment properly to subcontractors or for labor, materials or equipment not caused by the failure of the Owner to make payments to the DBC in a timely manner as provided herein; (d) reasonable doubt that the Work can be completed for the unpaid balance of the Contract Amount; (e) reasonable indication that the Work will not be completed within the Contract Time, except as provided in Article 15 of this Agreement; (f) unsatisfactory prosecution of the Work by the Contractor; or (g) any other material breach of the Contract Documents. 8.3.2 If the DBC has not remedied or cured or commenced reasonable actions to remedy or cure the conditions described in 8.2.1. not later than receipt of seven (7) calendar days prior written notice Owner may rectify the same at DBC's expense. Owner also may offset against any sums due Contractor the amount of any liquidated or non - liquidated obligations of Contractor to Owner, whether relating to or arising out of this Agreement. 8.4 Final Payment 8.4.1 Owner shall make final payment to DBC within thirty (30) calendar days after the Work is finally inspected and accepted by the Owner in accordance with Section 20.1 herein, provided that DBC first shall have furnished Owner with a properly executed and notarized copy of the Release and Affidavit attached as Exhibit C. 8.4.2 DBC's acceptance of final payment shall constitute a full waiver of any and all claims for payment of compensation hereunder by DBC against Owner ,except those previously made in writing and identified by DBC as unsettled at the time of the final Application for Payment. Neither the acceptance of the Work nor payment by Owner shall be deemed to be a waiver of Owner's right to enforce any obligations of DBC hereunder or to the recovery of damages for defective Work not discovered by the Owner at the time of final inspection. 8.5 Substantial Completion 8.5.1 DBC shall notify Owner when it believes the Work, or to the extent permitted in the Contract Documents, a portion of the Work, is substantially complete. Within five (5) days of Owner's receipt of DBC's notice, Owner and DBC will jointly inspect such Work to verify that it is substantially complete in accordance with the requirements of the Contract Documents. If Owned agrees in its reasonable discretion that such Work is substantially complete, Owner shall prepare and issue a Certificate of Substantial Completion that will set forth (i) the date of Substantial Completion of the Work or portion thereof, (ii) the remaining items of Work that have to be completed before final payment, (iii) provisions (to the extent not already provided in the Contract Documents) establishing Owner's and DBC's responsibility for the Project's security, maintenance, utilities and insurance pending final payment and (iv) an acknowledgment that warranties DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 8 commence to run on the date of Substantial Completion, except as may otherwise be noted in the Certificate of Substantial Completion. 8.5.2 Upon Substantial Completion of the entire Work or, if applicable, any portion of the Work, Owner shall release to DBC any retained amounts relating, as applicable, to the entire Work or completed portion of the Work, less an amount equal to the reasonable value of all remaining or incomplete items of Work as noted in the Certificate of Substantial Completion. 8.5.3 Owner, at its option, may use a portion of the Work which has been determined to be substantially complete, provided, however, that (i) a Certificate of Substantial Completion has been issued for the portion of Work addressing the items set forth in Section 7.2.1 above, and (ii) Owner and DBC agree that Owner's use or occupancy will not interfere with DBC's completion of the remaining Work. 8.6 Contract Time and Liquidated Damages 8.6.1 Time is of the essence in the performance of the Work under this Agreement. The "Commencement Date" shall be established in the Notice to Proceed to be issued by the Owner. DBC shall commence the Work within five (5) calendar days from receipt of the notice of the Commencement Date. No Work shall be performed at the Project site prior to the Commencement Date. The Work shall be substantially completed within two hundred and seventy -five (275) calendar days from the Commencement Date. The date of substantial completion of the Work (or designated portions thereof) shall be the date certified by the Owner, in its reasonable discretion, that construction is sufficiently complete and in accordance with the Contract Documents, so that Owner can occupy or utilize the Work (or designated portions thereof) for the use(s) for which it is intended. The work shall reach final completion and be ready for final acceptance by Owner within three hundred and thirty -five (335) calendar days from the Commencement Date (herein "Contract Time "). 8.6.2 Owner and DBC recognize that, since time is of the essence for this Agreement, Owner will suffer financial loss if the Work is not substantially completed within the time specified above, as said time may be adjusted as provided for herein. Should DBC fail to substantially complete the Work within the time period noted above, Owner shall be entitled to assess, as liquidated damages, but not as a penalty, $500.00 (five- hundred dollars) for each calendar day thereafter until substantial completion is achieved. Further, in the event Substantial Completion is reached, but the DBC fails to reach Final Completion, Owner shall also be entitled to assess, as liquidated damages, but not as a penalty, a sum certain per day, in the amount of $100 (one- hundred dollars), for each day after the time set for Final Completion, as set forth in paragraph four (4) above, until Final Completion is achieved. The Project shall be deemed to be substantially completed on the date the Owner's Project Manager issues a Certificate of Substantial Completion pursuant to the terms hereof. DBC hereby expressly waives and relinquishes all rights which it may have to seek to characterize the above noted liquidated damages as a penalty, which the parties agree represents fair and reasonable estimates of the Owner's actual damages at the time of contracting if DBC fails to substantially complete or finally complete the Work as scheduled. 8.6.3 DBC agrees to promptly pay any and all fines and/or penalties that may be imposed upon Collier County by the State of Florida and/or any agency (or agencies) of the State of DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) lUT Florida arising as a result of DBC's failure to substantially complete the scope of work within the time limits specified in this Agreement. DBC is hereby authorized on behalf of Collier County to contest and/or otherwise dispute any and all such fines and/or penalties should any be threatened to be imposed 8.6.4 When any period of time is referenced herein by "days ", the days shall be computed to exclude the first day and to include the last day of such time period. If the last day of any such period falls on a Saturday or Sunday or on a legal holiday in Collier County by Federal or Florida Law, each such day shall be omitted from the computation, and the last day shall become the next succeeding business day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday in Collier County, Florida. A day shall be a legal holiday in Collier County only if the government of Collier County recognizes that holiday by giving that day off from work by most of its employees or the DBC recognizes that day as a legal holiday and thereby gives the majority of its workers the day off from work. 8..6.5 For all contracts, regardless of whether the Contract Time is stipulated in calendar days or working days, the Owner will count default days as "calendar days." 8.6.6 If the DBC or, in case of his default, the surety, fails to complete the work within the time stipulated in the Contract for Substantial Completion, or within such extra time that the Owner may have granted the Contractor, or in case of his default, the surety, shall pay to the Owner, not as a penalty, but as liquidated damages, the amount of five- hundred dollars thirty -five dollars and eighteen cents ($535.18) per day for each day the DBC fails to reach Substantial Completion as required under the terms of the contract. Final -- Completion shall occur when the contract is completed in its entirety, is accepted by the Owner, in its reasonable discretion, as complete and is so stated by the Owner as complete. If the DBC reaches Substantial Completion but fails to reach Final Completion, the DBC, or in the case of his default, the surety, shall pay the sum of one - hundred ten dollars and forty -three cents ($110.43) per day for each day the DBC fails to reach Final Completion. 8.6.7 The Owner has the right to apply, as payment on such liquidated damages due under the Contract by allowing the Contractor to continue and to finish the work, or any part of it, after the expiration of the Contract Time including granted time extensions. 8.6.8 The Owner does not waive its right to liquidated damages due under the Contract by allowing the Contractor to continue and to finish the work, or any part of it, after the expiration of the Contract Time including granted time extensions. 8.6.9 In the case of a default of the Contract by the DBC and the completion of the work by the Owner, the DBC and his surety are liable for the liquidated damages under the Contract, but the Owner will not charge liquidated damages foi any delay in the Final Completion of the Owner's performance of the work due to any unreasonable action or delay on the part of the Owner. 8.6.10 The Owner considers the Contract complete when the DBC has completed in its entirety all of the work and the Owner, in its reasonable discretion, has accepted all of the work and notified the DBC in writing that the work is complete. The Owner will then release the DBC from further obligation except as set forth in his bond and except as provided in the Contract. DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 10 tor. 9. CHANGES IN THE WORK. 9.1. Owner shall have the right at any time during the progress of the Work to increase or decrease the Work. Promptly after being notified of a change, DBC shall submit an itemized estimate of any cost or time increases or savings it foresees as a result of the change. Except in an emergency endangering life or property, or as expressly set forth herein, no addition or changes to the Work shall be made except upon mutual written agreement of the parties, and Owner shall not be liable to the DBC for any increased compensation without such written order. No officer, employee or agent of Owner is authorized to direct any extra or changed work orally. 9.2. A Change Order, in the form attached as Exhibit E to this Agreement, shall be issued and executed promptly after an agreement is reached between DBC and Owner concerning the requested changes. DBC shall promptly perform changes authorized by duly executed Change Orders. The Contract Amount and Contract Time shall be adjusted in the Change Order in the manner as Owner and DBC shall mutually agree. 9.3. If Owner and DBC are unable to agree on a Change Order for the requested change, DBC shall nevertheless promptly perform the change as directed by Owner in a written Work Directive Change. In that event, the Contract Amount and Contract Time shall be adjusted as directed by Owner. If DBC disagrees with the Owner's adjustment determination, DBC must make a claim pursuant to and in strict compliance with Section 11 of these General Conditions or else be deemed to have waived any claims with regard to that adjustment or those adjustments. 9.4 In the event a requested change results in an increase to the Contract Amount, the amount of the increase shall be limited to the DBC's reasonable labor and material costs and reasonable actual equipment costs as a direct result of the change (including allowance for labor overhead costs) plus a maximum ten percent (10 1/o) markup for profit, provided also that the respective increase(s) (including those below as to Subcontractors, etc.,) would not have been incurred but for those specific change(s). In the event such change Work is performed by a Subcontractor, a maximum ten percent (10 %) markup for all overhead and profit for all Subcontractors' and sub - subcontractors' direct labor and material costs and actual equipment costs shall be permitted, with a maximum five percent (5 1/o) markup thereon by the DBC for all of its overhead and profit, for a total maximum markup of fifteen percent (15 %). All compensation due DBC and any Subcontractor or sub - subcontractor for field and home office overhead is included in the markups noted above. DBC's and Sub -DBC's bond costs associated with any change order shall be included in the overhead and profit expenses and shall not be paid as a separate line item. 9.5 Owner shall have the right to conduct an audit of DBC's books and records to verify the accuracy of the DBC's claim(s) with respect to DBC's costs associated with any Change Order. The Owner shall have authority to order minor changes in the Work not involving an adjustment to the Contract Amount or an extension to the Contract Time that is not inconsistent with the intent of the Contract Documents. Such changes may be effected by Field Order or by other written order. Such changes shall be binding on the DBC. 10. CONTRACT ADJUSTMENTS AND DISPUTES See Exhibit G for the Dispute Resolution Procedure and forms. DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 11 11. ASSIGNMENT DBC. shall not assign this Agreement or any part thereof without prior expressed written consent of Owner, which shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any attempt to assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement, or any part herein, without such Owner's consent, shall be void ab initio. If DBC does, with approval, assign this Agreement or any part thereof, it shall require that its assignee be bound to it and to assume toward DBC all of the obligations and responsibilities that DBC has assumed toward Owner. 12. HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS 12.1 Unless otherwise expressly provided in the Contract Documents to be part of the Work, DBC is not responsible for any Hazardous Conditions encountered at the site. Upon encountering any Hazardous Conditions, DBC will stop Work immediately in the affected area and duly notify Owner. 12.2 Upon receiving notice of the presence of suspected Hazardous Conditions, Owner shall take the necessary measures required to ensure that the Hazardous Conditions are remedied or rendered harmless. Such necessary measures shall include Owner retaining qualified independent experts to (i) ascertain whether Hazardous Conditions have actually been encountered, and, if they have been encountered, (ii) prescribe the remedial measures that Owner must take either to remove the Hazardous Conditions or render the Hazardous Conditions harmless. 12.3 DBC shall be obligated to resume Work at the affected area of the Project only after Owner's expert provides it with written certification that (i) the Hazardous Conditions have been removed or rendered harmless and (ii) all necessary approvals have been obtained from all government and quasi - government entities having jurisdiction over the Project or site. 12.4 DBC will be entitled, in accordance with these General Conditions of Contract, to an adjustment in its Contract Price and/or Contract Time(s) to the extent DBC's cost and/or time of performance have been adversely impacted by the presence of Hazardous Conditions. 12.5 To the fullest extent permitted by law, Owner agrees, to defend, hold harmless and indemnify DBC from and against any and all claims and liabilities, unless caused by DBC's sole negligence or willful misconduct, resulting from: a. Owner's violation of any federal, state or local statute, regulation or ordinance relating to the disposal of toxic or hazardous substances or constituents; b. Owner's undertaking of or arrangement for the handling, removal, treatment, storage, transportation or disposal of toxic or hazardous substances or constituents found on or identified at the site; Toxic or hazardous substances or constituents introduced at the site by Owner or third persons before, during, or after the completion of the Work herein; d. Allegations that DBC is a handler, generator, operator, treater or storer, transporter, or disposer under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, as amended, or any other similar federal, state or local regulation or law. DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 12 1 D W*4r 12.6 If a third party brings suit or claim for damages against DBC alleging personal injury and/or property damage from exposure to, or release of, toxic or hazardous substances, or constituents at or from the Project site before, during or after the Work herein, Owner agrees, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to defend, hold harmless and indemnify DBC from and against any and all claims and liabilities, and pay on DBC's behalf any judgment resulting against DBC, including interest thereon, unless such damages are caused by DBC's sole negligence. 13. DIFFERING SITE CONDITIONS 13.1 Concealed or latent physical conditions or subsurface conditions at the site (meaning such conditions that are not discoverable by recent appropriate, good faith site specific inspections conducted by DBC) that (i) materially differ from the conditions indicated in the Contract Documents or (ii) are of an unusual (unforeseeable) nature, differing materially from the conditions ordinarily encountered and generally recognized as inherent in the Work are collectively referred to herein as "Differing Site Conditions." If DBC encounters a Differing Site Condition, DBC will be entitled to an adjustment in the Contract Price and/or Contract Time(s) to the extent DBC's cost and/or time of performance are adversely impacted by the Differing Site Condition. 13.2 To mitigate as much as possible the adverse effects of all such conditions, upon encountering a Differing Site Condition, DBC shall provide prompt written notice to Owner itemizing in detail the specifics of the asserted Differing Site Condition(s), which notice shall not be later than fourteen (14) days after such condition has first been discovered or encountered. To the greatest extent possible, DBC shall provide Owner with such notice before any such Differing Site Condition has been substantially disturbed or altered. 14. PERFORMANCE OF WORK AND REMEDY 14.1 DBC shall obtain and assign to Owner all express warranties given to DBC or any subcontractor(s) by any material men supplying materials, equipment or fixtures to be incorporated into the Project. DBC warrants to Owner that any materials and equipment furnished under the Contract Documents shall be new except to the extent, if any, expressly specified otherwise, and that all Work shall be of good quality, free from all material defects and in conformance with the Contract Documents. DBC further warrant to Owner that all materials and equipment furnished under the Contract Documents shall be applied, installed, connected, erected, used, cleaned and conditioned in accordance with the instructions of the applicable manufacturers, fabricators, suppliers or processors except as otherwise provided for in the Contract Documents. If, within one (1) year after substantial completion, any Work is found to be defective or not in conformance with the Contract Documents, DBC shall correct it promptly after receipt of written notice from Owner. DBC shall also be responsible for and pay for replacement or repair of adjacent materials or Work, which may be damaged as a result of such replacement or repair. These warranties are in addition to those implied warranties to which Owner is entitled as a matter of law. 14.2. No later than thirty (30) days prior to expiration of the warranty, the Project Manager, or any other representative of the Owner, shall conduct an inspection of the warranted work to verify compliance with the requirements of the Agreement. The DBC's Representative shall be present at the time of inspection and shall take remedial actions to correct any deficiencies noted in the DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 13 lox. inspection. Failure of the DBC to correct the cited deficiencies shall be grounds for the County to disqualify the DBC from future County bid opportunities. 15. FORCE MAJEURE 15.1 Not withstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, if DBC is delayed at any time in the progress of the Work contemplated hereunder by any act of the Owner, by act of force majeure, by any act of DBC, of Owner or a third party, by adverse weather conditions not reasonably anticipated, or by unavoidable casualties, or by any other cause beyond DBC's control, or by delay authorized by Owner, the time for completion of the Work shall be extended for a time equal to the time of such delay, and DBC shall be compensated for changes in the Work necessitated by such force majeure event provided, however, that the delay would not have occurred but for the act or the force majeure. 15.2 In the event either party to this agreement is rendered unable, either wholly or in part, by an act or force majeure as described hereinabove, to carry out its obligation under this Agreement, other than its obligations to make payments when due, then the party affected by such act or force majeure, as described hereinabove, shall give written notice with clear explanation to the other party within five (5) business days of discovery of the act or force majeure. Following such notice, the effective obligations of the party giving notice shall be suspended only during the continuance of the act or force majeure, provided good faith due diligence is demonstrated in seeking remedy to the cause. 15.3 The term "force majeure" as employed herein shall mean acts of Nature, acts of public -- enemy, war, blockade, insurrection, riot, act of terrorism, epidemic, landslide, lightning, earthquake, fire, storm, flood, washout, civil disturbance, explosion, labor dispute, inability with reasonable diligence to obtain material(s) and/or any other substantially similar cause(s) not within the reasonable control of the parry claiming a suspension despite that parry's due diligence. 16. CHANGE IN LAW DBC shall be compensated for changes in the Work and the time for completion of the Work shall be extended as necessitated by the occurrence of any of the following on or subsequent to the Agreement Date: (a) the enactment, adoption, promulgation, modification, repeal, or formal change in interpretation of any federal, state or local law or regulation having the force of law; (b) the issuance or modification of an order, decree, or judgment of any federal, state or local court, administrative agency or governmental officer or body, acting in a judicial or quasi-judicial capacity, if the issuance or modification of any such order, decree, or judgment is not also the result of DBC's negligent or willful action or failure to act.; or (c) the delay in the review, issuance or renewal of or suspension, termination, interruption, denial, failure to issue or failure to renew any legal requirement, permit or approval, or the imposition of a term, condition or requirement which is more stringent or burdensome than that required by the Project Scope, if such act is not also the result of DBC's negligent or willful action or failure to act. 17. TERMINATION FOR CAUSE 17.1. DBC shall be considered in material default of the Agreement and such default shall be considered cause for Owner to terminate the Agreement, in whole or in part, as further set forth in DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 14 CAI -- this Section, if DBC: either fails to begin the Work under the Contract Documents within the time specified herein; or (2) fails to properly and timely perform the Work as directed by the Project Manager, or as provided for in the approved Progress Schedule; or (3) performs the Work unsuitably, or neglects or refuses to remove materials, or fails to correct or replace such Work as may be rejected by Owner (or Owner's representative) as being unacceptable or unsuitable; or (4) discontinues prosecution of the Work; or (5) fails to resume Work that has been suspended within a reasonable time after being notified to resume the Work, or (6) becomes insolvent or is declared bankrupt, or commits any act of bankruptcy; or (7) makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors; or (8) fails to obey any then applicable codes, laws, ordinances, rules or regulations with respect to the Work; or (9) materially breaches any other provision of the Contract Documents. Termination of the Agreement pursuant to subparagraphs (6) and (7) herein is allowed to the extent not prohibited by then applicable law. 17.2. Owner shall notify DBC in writing of DBC's default(s). If Owner determines that DBC has not remedied and cured the default(s) or commenced reasonable actions to effect a remedy or cure, within seven (7) calendar days following receipt by DBC Of-said written notice, then Owner, at its option, without releasing or waiving any of its rights and remedies against DBC's sureties and without prejudice to any other right or remedy it may be entitled to hereunder or by law, may terminate DBC's right to proceed under the Agreement, in whole or in part, and may take possession of all or any portion of the Work, may take assignments of any of DBC's subcontracts and purchase orders, and may complete all or any portion of DBC's Work by whatever lawful means, method or agency which Owner, in its sole discretion, may choose. 17.3. If Owner deems any of the foregoing remedies necessary; DBC agrees that it shall not be entitled to receive any further payments hereunder until after the Project is completed. All moneys expended and all of the costs, losses, damages and extra expenses, including all management, administrative and other overhead and other direct and indirect expenses (including Design Professional and reasonable attorneys' fees, including appeals) or damages incurred by Owner incident to such completion, shall be deducted from the Contract Amount, and if such expenditures exceed the unpaid balance of the Contract Amount, DBC agrees to pay promptly to Owner on demand the full amount of such excess, including costs of collection, reasonable attorneys' fees (including appeals) with interest thereon (compounded monthly until paid in full) at the Prime Rate as published daily in the Wall Street Journal. If the unpaid balance of the Contract Amount exceeds all such costs, expenditures and damages incurred by the Owner to complete the Work, such excess with such interest shall be paid to the DBC. The amount to be paid to the DBC or Owner, as the case may be, shall be approved by the Owner, upon application, and this obligation for payment shall survive termination of the Agreement. 17.4. The liability of DBC hereunder shall extend to and include the full amount of any and all sums paid, expenses and losses incurred, damages sustained, and obligations assumed by Owner in good faith under the belief that such payments or assumptions were necessary or required, in completing the Work and providing labor, materials, equipment, supplies, and other items therefor or re- letting the Work, and in settlement, discharge or compromise of any claims, demands, suits, and judgments pertaining to or arising out of the Work hereunder. 17.5. If, after notice of termination of DBC's right to proceed pursuant to this Section, it is determined for any reason that DBC was not in default, or that its default was excusable, or that Owner is not entitled to the remedies against DBC provided herein, then DBC's remedies against Owner shall include all costs and expenses incurred by the DBC as a result of the Owner's actions, including reasonable attorney's fees. DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 15 100' 17.6. The Owner shall use all reasonable and diligent, good faith efforts to mitigate any of its damages against the DBC. 18. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE 18.1. Owner shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without cause upon seven (7) calendar days written notice to DBC. In the event of such termination for convenience, DBC's recovery against Owner shall be limited to that portion of the Contract Amount earned through the date of termination, together with any retainage withheld and reasonable termination expenses incurred, but DBC shall not be entitled to any other or further recovery against Owner, including, but not limited to, damages or any anticipated profit on portions of the Work not performed. 18.2 Owner shall have the right to suspend all or any portions of the Work upon giving DBC not less than five (5) calendar days' prior written notice of such suspension. If all or any portion of the Work is so suspended for an aggregate of thirty (30) calendar days or less, DBC's sole and exclusive remedy shall be to seek an extension of time to its schedule in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Contract Documents. If the aggregate suspension is more than thirty (30) calendar days, the DBC be entitled to a reasonable extension of time and additional compensation. Provided, however, if the ordered suspension exceeds six (6) months, the DBC shall have the right to terminate the Agreement with respect to that portion of the Work which is subject to the ordered suspension. 19. PERFORMANCE BOND AND PAYMENT BOND 19.1 DBC shall provide Performance and Payment Bonds, in the form prescribed in Exhibit H, in the amount of 100% of the Contract Amount, the costs of which to be paid by DBC. The Performance and Payment Bonds shall be underwritten by a surety authorized to do business in the State of Florida and otherwise acceptable to Owner; provided, however, the surety shall be rated as "A-" or better as to general policy holders rating and Class V or higher rating as to financial size category and the amount required shall not exceed 5% of the reported policy holders surplus, all as reported in the most current Best Key Rating Guide, published by A.M. Best Company, Inc. of 75 Fulton Street, New York, New York 10038. Should the contract amount be less than $500,000, the requirements of Section 287.0935, Florida Statutes shall govern the rating and classification of the surety. 19.2 If the surety for any bond furnished by DBC is declared bankrupt, becomes insolvent, its right to do business is terminated in the State of Florida, or it ceases to meet the requirements imposed by the Contract Documents, the DBC shall, within twenty -one (21) calendar days thereafter, substitute another bond and surety, both of which shall be subject to the Owner's approval. 20. TITLE TO WASTE At no time will DBC take title, constructive or express, to any hazardous or toxic substance or constituent, to any waste, or to any asbestos or asbestos containing- materials. DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 16 0067- 21. SAMPLES Test specimens or samples generally are consumed or substantially altered during testing and are disposed of immediately upon completion of tests. Drilling samples and other specimens are disposed of thirty (30) days after DBC's submission of its report. NON - HAZARDOUS SAMPLES. At Owner's written request, DBC will retain preservable test specimens or the residue there from for thirty (30) days after submission of DBC's report free of storage charges HAZARDOUS OR POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS SAMPLES. In the event that samples contain hazardous constituents, DBC will return such samples to Owner, or using a manifest signed by Owner as generator, DBC will have such samples transported to a location selected by Owner for final disposal. Owner agrees to pay all costs associated with the storage, transport, and disposal of samples. Owner recognizes and agrees that DBC acts as a bailee and at no time assumes title to said materials. 22. DOCUMENTS 22.1 All documents, including but not limited to, drawings, specifications, reports, boring logs, field notes, laboratory test data, calculations and estimates, prepared by DBC as instruments of service pursuant to this Agreement, shall be Owner's sole property, upon payment of all compensation due to the DBC hereunder. Owner agrees that all documents of any nature furnished to Owner or Owner's agents or designees, if not paid for, will be returned upon demand and will not be used by Owner for any purpose whatsoever. Owner agrees to indemnify DBC against claims, loss and damages resulting from the use of these documents for purposes other than those specifically called for under this Agreement. 22.2 DBC shall keep such full and detailed records as may be reasonably necessary to reflect: a) proper financial management under this Agreement; and b) the Services performed, including, when applicable, testing, sampling and investigatory services performed by DBC. Such records will be subject to review by Owner on the condition that Owner identifies, in writing, those documents requested. Documents will be available for inspection at mutually agreeable times for a period of two (2) years after the Services have been completed, or longer where required by law. 23. CONFIDENTIALITY 23.1 DBC shall treat as confidential property and not disclose to others, any information (including any technical information, experience or date) regarding Owner's plans, programs, plants, processes, products, costs, equipment, operations or customers which may come within the knowledge of DBC, its officers or employees, agents or consultants in the performance of this Agreement, including any data gathered and reports prepared by DBC, without in each instance securing the prior written consent of Owner. 23.2 Nothing contained herein, shall prevent DBC from disclosing to others or using in any manner information which it can show: DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 17 JQT' a. Has been published and has become part of the public domain other than by the acts, omissions or fault of DBC its employees, agents or consultants; b. Has been furnished or made known to DBC by third parties (other than those acting directly or indirectly for or on behalf of DBC or Owner) as a matter of legal right without restrictions on its disclosure; c. Was in DBC's possession prior to the disclosure thereof by Owner to DBC; d. Was independently developed by DBC; or Was required to be discussed by law. Provided, however, DBC shall not release, or cause or allow the release of, information to the communications media, except as required by law, concerning the existence or terms of this Agreement. The foregoing obligations shall survive the termination or expiration of this Agreement for a period of two (2) years from the completion of Services. 24. SEVERABILITY In the event any provision or part herein shall be deemed invalid or unenforceable, the other provisions or parts hereof shall remain in full force and effect, and binding upon the parties hereto. 25. SURVIVAL All obligations arising prior to the termination of this Agreement and all provisions of this Agreement allocating responsibility or liability between Owner and DBC shall survive the completion of the Services and the termination of this Agreement. 26. GOVERNING LAW This Agreement shall be governed in all respects by the laws of the State of Florida. 27. NOTICES Any notices required to be given under the terms of this agreement shall be provided in writing and posted in regular mail, postage prepaid, to the following addresses: DBC Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. 3740 Executive Way Miramar, Florida 33025 ATTN: Mr. Roberto S. Ortiz, P.E. OWNER Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 ATTN: Jim McGee DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 18 i low-. For the purposes of this Agreement, notices shall be deemed to have been received upon three (3) days time after posting of the written notice in the U.S. Mail. 28 DIRECT PURCHASE 28.1 The Owner reserves the right to require DBC to assign some or all of its agreements with material suppliers directly to the Owner. Any such goods and/or materials purchased by the Owner pursuant to such an assignment of a material supply agreement shall be referred to as "Owner Furnished Materials" and the responsibilities of both the Owner and the DBC relating to said materials shall be governed by the terms and conditions of this Agreement which shall take precedence over other conditions and terms of this Agreement where inconsistencies or conflicts exist. Additionally, the Owner; at it's sole option; may choose to purchase some or all of the goods and/or materials from other suppliers. In either instance the Owner may require the following information from the DBC: 1. Required quantities of material. 2. Specifications relating to goods and/or materials required for job including brand and/or model number or type if applicable 3. Pricing and availability of goods and/or materials provided under DBC's agreements with material suppliers 28.2 Purchasing Upon receipt of a proper requisition (including appropriate backup material(s), the Purchasing Department shall issue a Purchase Order for the material required. Each Purchase Order shall contain the Owner's certificate of exemption number. The Purchase order shall be given to the Project Manager for completion of the ordering process. Unless the following items were included in the quote provided by the vendor to the Project Manager, the Purchase Order shall also provide for reimbursement of the cost to the supplier for: A. Shipping and handling B. Insurance costs C. Performance Bond 28.3 General Terms and Conditions A. DBC shall be required to maintain records of all Owner - furnished materials that it incorporates into the project from the stock of Owner - furnished materials in its possession. Such records shall be furnished monthly to the Project Manager or their designee and shall include information on materials that have l.) Been delivered into the DBC's possession and/or 2.) been incorporated into the project. DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 19 ,lox, B. Notwithstanding the transfer of Owner - furnished materials by the Owner to the DBC's possession, the Owner shall retain legal and equitable title to any and all Owner - furnished materials. C. The transfer of possession of Owner - furnished materials from the Owner to the DBC shall constitute a bailment for the mutual benefit of the Owner and the DBC. The Owner shall be considered the bailor, and the DBC the bailee for the Owner - furnished materials. Owner - furnished materials shall be considered returned to the Owner for purposes of their bailment at such time as they are incorporated into the Project. D. The Owner shall purchase and maintain insurance sufficient to protect against any loss or damage to Owner - furnished materials. Such insurance shall cover the replacement cost of any Owner - furnished materials not yet incorporated into the Project during the period between the time the Owner first takes title to any such materials and the time when the last of said materials are incorporated into the project. E. The Owner shall be liable for any interruption or delays in the project, for any defects or other problems with the project, or for any additional costs resulting from any delay in the delivery of, or defects in, Owner - furnished materials. F. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating a partnership between the Owner and the DBC or to constitute the DBC as an agent of the Owner. 29. CAPTIONS AND HEADINGS The captions and headings throughout this Agreement are for convenience and reference only, and the words contained therein shall in no way be held or deemed to define, limit, describe, explain, modify, amplify, or add to the interpretation, construction or meaning of any provision of, or scope of intent of, this Agreement nor in any way affect this Agreement. 30. VENDOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Collier County has implemented a Vendor Performance Evaluation System for all contracts awarded in excess of $25,000. To this end, vendors will be evaluated on their performance upon completion/termination of agreement. 31. ENTIRE AGREEMENT 31.1 This Agreement, and any attachments or other documents incorporated by reference herein, supersede any previous written or oral contracts or negotiations and this Agreement shall constitute the complete Agreement between the parties hereto and is subject to change only by an instrument in writing and signed by Owner and DBC. No third parry beneficiary is anticipated or intended by this Agreement. °-' 31.2 The Parties agree that the provisions of these terms and conditions shall control over and govern as to any form writings signed by the Parties, such as Client Purchase Orders, Work Orders, or other Order, and that such forms may be issued by Owner to DBC as a matter of convenience to DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 20 10, :T IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the day and year first written above and continuing for one year from that date unless terminated earlier by mutual agreement or as described herein: ATTEST: 425- orporate Secretary/Witness / J c,,� Cl ✓j D, 144-061 Printed Name 1 ` a � Second Witness FORE S. QR(77-9- Printed Name Date: z Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, "DBC" Vice Presiden Mark S. Blanchard Date: March 15, 200 OWNER: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF <, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA Dwight E.^Hoct� Clerk Deputy Clerk Jam . Coletta, Chairman s i tg�a'.� ' , a't""" , s Approved As To Form and Le`galal�Sufficien 4k4_�� Thomas Palmer, Assistant County Attorney 10j-, CERTIFICATE OF ASSISTANT SECRETARY METCALF & EDDY, INC. I, Richard D. Howard, do hereby certify that I am Assistant Secretary of Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Corporation). I hereby further certify that Mark Blanchard is a Vice President of this Corporation and has the authority to execute a Design -Build Agreement with Collier County, Florida for North Regional Water Treatment Plant Well Field Expansion in the amount of $3,973,196. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand, as of this 1St day of March, 2002. 4-1rl iU-, i a . a Assistant Secretary iKm EXHIBIT A PROJECT SCOPE AND SERVICES Collier County North Water Treatment Plant Well Field Expansion The Collier County North Water Treatment Plant Well Field Expansion to be constructed pursuant to the Design -Build Agreement consists of • Four (4) new water supply wells, • A stand -by generator to provide electric power during outages • Slab on grade structures with a fenced enclosure to support the wells and the generator "" • Raw water piping (dual) to connect new wells to existing wells. The Work to be performed by the DBC is described in drawings and specifications as follows: • Scope of Services/Technical Specifications for Project, Attachments 1 -5, as follows: Well Installation Piping & Site Development Mechanical & Structural Electrical Instrumentation & Control System • Drawings titled Construction Drawings Collier County Utilities North County Regional Water Treatment Plant Wellfield Facilities Dated: February 26, 2002 Drawings consist of 27 drawings as follows: G -1 Title and Location, Vicinity Maps and Index of Drawings G -2 Well Construction Details -- C -1 Well House Site Plan RO 12N, 14N & 15N C -2 Well House Site Plan RO 13N DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 22 1w-, k_ P -1 Instrumentation Legend and Symbols P -2 P & ID — Well Field WT -1 Transmission Main Extension — STA. 82+00 To 192 +13.38 WT -2 Transmission Main Extension — STA. 82 +00 To 92 +00 WT -3 Transmission Main Extension — STA. 92 +00 To 104 +00 WT-4 Transmission Main Extension — STA. 104 +00 To 119 +00 WT -5 Transmission Main Extension — STA. 119+00 To 134 +00 WT-6 Transmission Main Extension — STA. 134 +00 To 149 +00 WT -7 Transmission Main Extension — STA. 149+00 To 164 +00 WT -8 Transmission Main Extension — STA. 164 +00 To 178+00 WT -9 Transmission Main Extension — STA. 178 +00 To 192 +13.38 WT -10 Transmission Main Extension — General Notes and Details WT -11 Transmission Main Extension — Utility Construction Details MS -1 Standard Structural Details MS -2 Standard Mechanical Details MS -5 Wellhouse 12, 14 & 15 —Plan & Sections MS -6 Wellhouse 13 — Plan & Sections E -1 Single Line Diagrams E -2 Electrical Site Plan E -3 Wellhouse Plans E-4 Elementary Wiring Diagrams & Miscellaneous Details E -5 Conduit & Wire Schedule E -6 Panel Schedule DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 23 1 flr 1. The following provides a detailed description of the project scope and services: a. DBC will install four (4) new water production wells Nos. 12N, 13N, 14N, and 15N at locations as indicated on the Drawings that are part of the Agreement. Each production well will* be cased with varying diameter fiberglass reinforced plastic to a depth of approximately 725 feet below land surface (bls) and completed with an 11 inch diameter open hole to approximately 950 feet bls. Construction of the production wells is to be completed in accordance with the Drawings and specification package provided as Attachment 1 to this document. b. Test wells are part of this Agreement, but no test wells have been installed. As no test wells have been installed at any of the proposed well locations it has been necessary to design the well pumping equipment using available information, assuming that as test well data becomes available it will be necessary to make revisions and/or changes to the design. i. Available information has been utilized regarding anticipated water quality and quantity to be obtained from new wells. These assumptions have been developed by the hydrogeological consultant on the project; they are based on recent well tests at adjacent wells, and experience by the consultant with the area. Assumptions used for design of production wells (Nos. 12N -15N) for the project are shown on Table 1, attached. ii. These are considered the "baseline" conditions for the design of well pumps and raw water pipeline in this Agreement. In the event that after completion of the test well program currently being implemented, it is determined that actual conditions vary significantly from "base line" assumptions, such variance will constitute a changed condition and comprise the basis for renegotiation of scope of service and or fee. iii. The scope of work for this Agreement includes construction of a test/production well at well No. 13N. A production well will be installed at well No. 13N, and this well will also be utilized as a test well, initially, to gather necessary hydrogeologic data. Well No. 13N will be deepened by 300 feet using a reduced core, so it can be used as a test well. c. DBC will furnish and install dual (2 pipes) HDPE raw water transmission mains. However, the double - barrel pipe will NOT be installed from Well No. I IN to Well No. 15N. A single 18 -inch diameter HDPE line will be constructed from Well No. I IN to Well No. 15N. DBC will connect one of the two new mains to an existing 16 -inch transmission main at well No.11N. DBC will also install a single 18 -inch diameter HDPE raw water transmission main parallel to the existing 16 / 18 -inch main from well No. I IN to well No. 7N and connect to the existing 18 -inch transmission main at that point. A single "pig launching" station will be constructed by the DBC at well No. 15N and is to be arranged so that it may serve either new transmission main. Transmission mains will be constructed within the limits of an existing SFWMD easement in accordance with the specification package provided as Attachment 2 to this document. d. It has been assumed, as no site - specific geotechnical data is available for the proposed route of the proposed raw water main; that site conditions will not significantly vary from those found to exist along the route of the previously installed portions of the raw water main as outlined in boring logs available from the Owner. e. DBC will construct the mechanical pumping, piping, and valving equipment associated with the wells, which will consist of four (4) above grade slab mounted well pump stations. One station will be constructed at each well location and will consist of a DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 24 /ax submersible pump, automated control valve, and various items of interconnection piping. Each pump station will be located within an enclosed fenced compound. Construction of the pump stations are to be completed in accordance with the specification package provided as Attachment 3 to this document. The discharge for each pump station will be connected to each raw water pipeline through a manually controlled valve connection. f. In order to provide the electrical power necessary to operate the new well pump stations, DBC will construct 800 amps, 480 volt, 3 -phase power distribution system. Power for this system will be obtained from the existing FP &L power grid located at the end of N.W. 13t` street and will be extended via an overhead service line, to the site of the proposed well No. 13N pump station, which will serve as the main control and distribution point for power to the remaining three (3) well pump stations to be installed under this project. i. It is assumed that all permitting necessary to allow for the electric power crossing of the existing SFWMD canal will be provided directly by FP &L. ii. In addition to the construction of the commercial power service as described above, DBC will also install a slab mounted-500 Kw stand -by diesel generator set with a double wall sub -base fuel tank at the No. 13N well location. This standby power system will be adequate to power the new wells installed under this project in the event of the loss of commercial power. g. The power feed and control to each individual well will be provided via underground conduit to be installed adjacent to the transmission main being installed under this project. Conduit will utilize PVC pipe as conduit. h. Control and electrical distribution equipment will be provided in NEMA 4 enclosures. i. The construction of the electrical distribution system will be completed in accordance --- with the specification package provided as Attachment 4 to this document j. Control System: DBC will furnish instrumentation and control system to integrate into the North Water Treatment Plant control system the various systems and monitoring features supplied with the provided equipment. DBC will furnish flow, level and pressure monitoring for each of the four (4) new wells installed as part of this project. The Instrumentation and Control System is more completely described on the Drawings and in subsequent sections of the Specifications provided as Attachment 5 to this document and as follows: i. Supply and install Local Control Panels as a complete assembly including circuit breakers, power distribution terminal blocks, terminals, enclosures, wiring, well pump motor starter, PLC remote UO system, fiber optic remote 1/0 data link, step -down transformer, 120/240 volt power distribution, PLC uninterruptible power supply and necessary accessories as indicated. ii. Install fiber optic cable from existing fiber optic cable at existing Local Control Panel located at Well house H9 (9N), including connection to each new Local Control Panel provided for this project. iii. Install instrumentation including related isolation valves, manifolds, mounting hardware, etc. as indicated on the Drawings and required by the Specifications. iv. Perform on -site calibration and commissioning of instruments including devices in process equipment. v. Develop, test, debug, install, tune, and commission application software to monitor and control raw water wells and emergency generator systems from existing North Water Treatment Plant panel. vi. Upon completion of the above items of work, DBC will provide the "startup" -- services to demonstrate to the Owner's personnel the proper functioning of the various systems constructed under this project and to provide up to 5 days of training to the Owner's operations staff. DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 25 1OX 2. Project Schedule a. Project Schedule is attached as Figure 1. 3. Assumptions for DBC pricing a. DBC is unable to provide guarantees on the quantity or quality of water obtained from proposed new wells. b. Price proposal is based on well (pump) settings determined from available information from hydrogeologic consultants; Refer to Table 1 (attached). Well settings have been developed using conservative assumptions for groundwater drawdown. If greater drawdown is experienced, then the pump settings will need to be changed, creating the basis for a price and schedule adjustment. c. Proposed production well pricing is a unit price contract, based on unit prices and quantities of work estimated utilizing available information and engineering judgment. As a result, it is understood that actual quantities of work may vary based upon site conditions. It is agreed that upon completion of -the installation of the production wells and the determination of final quantities of work provided, that the pricing for well installation will be adjusted to reflect these final quantities; and an appropriate change order will be issued. (credit or extra) d. Pricing is based on the use of subcontractors listed herein. If for any reason, a subcontractor/ supplier is found to be unacceptable to Owner, or subcontractor/ supplier is unable to provide service as proposed, this will require re- negotiation of pricing for the project with the Owner. e. It has been assumed that all required project easements will be available when work by DBC begins on this project, currently estimated to be March 1, 2002. In the event that any portion of the required easements are unavailable, it is agreed that such a condition will be the basis for re- negotiation of pricing with Owner to reflect potential cost increases as a result of the need to construct this project in a manner other than that which is presented on the project schedule which is attached to this Agreement. f. It is assumed that Owner will waive all building permit fees. g. It is assumed that the FP &L service installation fee will not exceed $1,400.00 and that upon energization of the permanent power service for this project that the Owner will pay all power bills. It is assumed that the FDEP construction permit fee will be $10,000.00. h. Both Owner and DBC are providing permitting for the proposed facilities. The progress of the work is dependent on the timely acquisition of permits, and delays in processing of permits may cause delays in completion of the work. DBC will take steps to exert due diligence in completing the required permits under its scope of work. However, it should be recognized that DBC does not have any control over the length of time required to process permits for the project, in not only in those permits that are under the scope of work, but also in those permits being completed by Owner, outside of the scope of work. DBC is responsible for those permits as indicated in Table 2; herein. i. DBC has assumed that all material and equipment deliveries to the project site can traverse the bridge on N.W. 13`h street, which provides access to the site. j. Connections and tie -ins to the existing piping and electrical conduits will be performed during normal daytime working hours. k. No pretreatment of groundwater is required. 1. After County approval of permits, and issuance of County building permits, any and all changes to the work directed by Owner's or other building inspectors will be considered -- the basis for additional work. DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 26 I OWT m. DBC has assumed that the grassed areas adjacent to well No. 13N, and outside of SVIFWMD easement, can be used for temporary parking and storage of materials and equipment. 4. Design reviews. Owner will review DBC's design Drawings and Specifications, and will provide comments to the DBC, in order to develop a project that meets the Owner's needs. Also, Owner will review, monitor and inspect all construction to assess conformance to the contract Drawings and Specifications. Owner's input to the design process will be solicited by DBC at design progress meetings and at key stages in the design. The Owner recognizes that the design/build process requires that DBC and the Owner work cooperatively to assure timely design review. 5. Construction reviews. The Owner will review, monitor and, as it deems necessary, inspect the construction to assess conformance with the Design Requirements and the plans and Specifications. In addition, the Owner will review the progress of construction to verify payment for services. The Owner and its Contract Representative(s) will have access to the construction work at all times. a. DBC will submit monthly progress reports to and hold monthly progress review meetings with the Owner. DBC will record the minutes of construction progress meetings, and provide the Owner with copies of minutes and documentation of said meetings. b. In parallel with DBC review of shop Drawings, submittals and samples, the Owner will have the opportunity to comment on major equipment shop Drawings. Prior to the start of construction, the Owner will indicate which construction submittals it is interested in reviewing. c. The Owner will submit its comments on each construction submission within five (5) Business Days of receipt, or such shorter period as the parties may agree, and will notify DBC of any concerns or issues on such submission within that time. d. Updated progress schedules will be submitted to the owner in conjunction with the monthly progress meetings. 6. Start-up testing will occur in accordance with applicable laws, rules, regulations, permits, codes and standards, and with the requirements for start-up and testing set forth herein. Start-up Testing will be performed in the following phases: • Startup testing a. In the startup testing, DBC will test individual equipment and subsystems to demonstrate that each is installed correctly and functions as intended. b. DBC will provide the Owner with an equipment test plan that provides test protocols and schedules for the following: i. Observation and monitoring of motor vibration, temperature, and noise. ii. Functional tests of controls and instruments. iii. Additional equipment- specific tests in accordance with Good Industry Practice and the contract Specifications, such as: manufacturers' recommendations, including vibration, noise, clearances, tightness, and proper lubrication. iv. A simulated power outage test conducted to demonstrate proper switchover to standby power and full restart to pre - outage conditions for major facility components. v. Pipeline testing - pressure and bacteriological testing in accordance with industry standards DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 27 I OT Table 1 Summary of North Collier County Well field Assumptions Used in Design of Wells Nos. 12N -15N Well No. Assumed Assumed Assumed Max. Assumed Max Assumed Max Assumed Grade Static Water Drawdown, ft. z Drawdown, Withdrawal Chloride Conc. Elevation, ft Level, ft. ` ft. 1 used in mg/1 Hydraulic Modeling, gpm 2 RO-1N 1235 25 -30 -5 953 4,300 RO.2N 1235 25 -10 15 939 6,400 RO-3N 11.20 25 -10 15 943 5,200 RO4N 11.40 25 -65 40 925 6,500 RO-5N 11.10 25 40 -1S 944 3,000 RO6N 11.05 25 20 5 946 3,900 RO-7N 11.40 25 75 -50 474 2,400 ROAN 11.48 25 -175 -150 483 2,800 RO-ION 11.50 25 -90 -65 937 3,000 RO-11N 11.50 25 -30 -5 943 2,400 RO -12N 12.00 25 -175 -150 934 3,000 RO -13N 12.00 25 -175 -150 939 3,000 RO -14N 12.00 25 -175 -150 946 3,000 RO -15N 12.00 25 -175 -150 944 3,000 Relative to grade elevation 2 Relative to static water level DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 28 16j- Table 2 Summary of North Water Treatment Plant Well Field Expansion -- Permitting Scope Permit Name Agency Facility Responsibility Well Construction Collier County Test Wells DBC Well Construction SFWMD Production Wells DBC Development Water Collier County Property Acquisition Owner Discharge No Permit Required Well Development DBC Site Development Plan (SDP) Collier County (Zoning) Site Use and Land Clearing Owner (Wilson - Miller) Building Collier County DBC *Mechanical Collier County DBC *Electrical Collier County DBC *Underground Utility Collier County DBC ERP Permit Owner (Wilson - Miller) Right -of -Way Modification SFWMD Easement Owner (Wilson - Miller) Water System Raw Water Wells & Construction FDEP Pipeline DBC Easement for Well #12N Collier County Property Acquisition Owner FPL Service FPL Electric Power DBC DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 29 t Bacteriological Report FDEP Water Pipe Disinfection Fuel Tank Registration FDEP Generator Fuel Tank 0J- DBC DBC Contractor's Fuel Tank Installation Form FDEP Generator Fuel Tank DBC 'Indicates subsidiary permit pulled under a master permit 1. DBC is responsible for completing permit applications and submitting same for those permits shown above under "Responsibility — DBC ". 2. DBC is relying on Owner to provide DBC with certain permits and approvals that impact the schedule and cost of the project. These permits are outside of the scope of work of DBC and not within the DBC's control, so any delays resulting from such Owner related permits may result in an amendment to the contract schedule and price. 3. DBC will exercise possible due diligence in pursuing the submittal and processing of above -noted permits. However, DBC does not control or can accurately predict the permitting process. Therefore, any permitting delays suffered that are outside of the assumptions noted on DBC's schedule will require an adjustment to the schedule. DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 30 /bi- EXHIBIT B APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT (County Project Manager) Bid No. (County Department) Project No. Collier County Board of County Commissioners (the OWNER) or Collier County Water -Sewer District (the OWNER) Application Date FROM: ( DBC's Representative) Payment Application No for ( DBC's Name) Work accomplished through Date: ( DBC's Address) RE: (Project Name) Original Contract Time: Revised Contract Time: Percent Work completed to Date: % Percent Contract Time completed to Date % Original Contract Amount: $ Total Change Orders to Date $ Revised Contract Amount $ Total value of Work Completed and stored to Date $ Less Retainage $ Total earned Less Retainage $ Less previous payment (s) $ AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION: $ ATTACH SCHEDULE OF VALUES AND ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTATION TO THIS APPLICATION DBC'S CERTIFICATION: The undersigned DBC certifies that: (1) all previous progress payments received from OWNER on account of Work done under the Contract referred to above have been applied to discharge in full all obligations of DBC incurred in connection with Work covered by prior Applications for Payment numbered 1 through inclusive; (2) title to all materials and equipment incorporated in said Work or otherwise listed in or covered by this Application for Payment will pass to OWNER at time of payment free and clear of all liens, claims, security interests and encumbrances (except such as covered by Bond acceptable to OWNER); (3) all amounts have been paid for work which previous payments were issued and received from the OWNER and that current payment is now due; (4) and DBC agrees that all overruns as shown on the monthly estimate summary shall, in fact, be added to the revised contract and shall be incorporated into a future Change Order: By DBC: (DEC's Name) (Signature) DATE: (Type Name & Title) (shall be signed by a duly authorized representative of DBC) DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 31 /OT �-- Payment to the DBC for the above AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION is recommended: By Design Professional: (DP's Name) (Signature) DATE: (Type Name & Title) Payment to the DBC for the above AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION is approved: By OWNER'S Project Manager: (Signature) DATE: (Type Name and Title) DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 32 EXHIBIT C RELEASE AND AFFIDAVIT FORM COUNTY OF COLLIER STATE OF FLORIDA /6 %r Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared , who after being duly sworn, deposes and says: (1) In accordance with the Contract Documents and in consideration of $ paid, "DBC" hereby releases and waives for itself and its subcontractors at every tier, material men, suppliers, successors and/or assigns, all claims for payments due under this Agreement, against the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District ( "Owner ") relating in any way to the performance of the Agreement between DBC and Owner, dated 2002, for the period from to (2) DBC hereby certifies for itself and its subcontractors at every tier, material men, suppliers, successors and /or assigns, that all charges for labor, materials, supplies, lands, licenses and other expenses for which Owner might be sued or for which a lien or a demand against any payment bond might be filed, have been fully satisfied and paid. (3) This Release and Affidavit is given in connection with DBC's [monthly /final] Application for Payment No. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, "DBC" Date: ATTEST: By: (L. S.) Title of individual signing First Witness Printed Name Second Witness Printed Name DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 33 /o Or STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2002, by , as of a Delaware corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He /she is personally known to me or produced as identification, and did not take an oath. My Commission Expires: (AFFIX OFFICIAL SEAL) (Signature of Notary) Name: Notary Public, State of (Legibly Printed) DB Agreement Final (3/1/02) 34 for EXHIBIT D CERTIFICATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION OWNER'S Project No. ENGINEER'S Project PROJECT: Contract For Contract Date This Certificate of Substantial completion applies to all Work -under the Contract documents or to the following specified parts thereof: To [insert correct information] OWNER And To The Work to which this Certificate applies has been inspected by authorized representatives of OWNER, DBC, AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, and that such Work is hereby declared to be substantially complete in accordance with the contract documents on the following effective date: THE DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION A tentative list of items to be completed or corrected is attached hereto. This list may not be all - inclusive, and the failure to include an item in it does not alter the responsibility of DBC to complete all the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. The items in the tentative list shall be completed or corrected by DBC within days of the above date of Substantial Completion. DB Agreement Final (311102) 35 / 01140 The responsibilities between OWNER and DBC for security, operation, safety, maintenance, heat, uui�....., insurance and warranties shall be as follows: RESPONSIBILITIES: OWNER: The following documents are attached to and made a part of this Certificate: This certificate does not constitute an acceptance of Work not in accordance with the Contract Documents nor is it a release of DBC'S obligation to complete the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Executed by Design Professional on , 2002 Design Professional By: Type Name and Title DBC accepts this Certificate of Substantial Completion on 12002 DBC By: Type Name and Title OWNER accepts this Certificate of Substantial Completion on 12002 OWNER By: Type Name and Title 36 / OT CHANGE ORDER NO. TO: DATE: PROJECT NAME: _ PROJECT NO.: EXHIBIT E CHANGE ORDER CONTRACT NO. Under our AGREEMENT dated , 2002. You hereby are authorized and directed to make the following change(s) in accordance with terms and conditions of the Agreement: FOR THE (Additive) (Deductive) Sum of: Original Agreement Amount Sum of Previous Changes This Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ Present Agreement Amount $. The time for completion shall be (increased /decreased) by calendar days due to this Change Order. Accordingly, the Contract Time is now () calendar days. The substantial completion date is and the final completion date is . Your acceptance of this Change Order shall constitute a modification to our Agreement and will be performed subject to all the same terms and conditions as contained in our Agreement indicated above, as fully as if the same were repeated in this acceptance. The adjustment, if any, to the Agreement shall constitute a full and final settlement of any and all claims for payment due under this Agreement of the DBC arising out of or related to the change set forth herein, including claims for impact and delay costs. Accepted: By: 12002 M OWNER: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DESIGN PROFESSIONAL K3►A /07- EXHIBIT F WORK DIRECTIVE CHANGE PROJECT NAME: CHANGE # DATE OF ISSUANCE: EFFECTIVE DATE: OWNER: Collier County Board of Commissioners PROJECT #: DBC: ENGINEER: You are directed to proceed promptly with the following change(s): Description: Purpose of Work Directive Change: Attachments: If a claim is made that the above change(s) have affected Contract Price or Contract Times any claim for a Change Order based thereon will involve one or more of the following methods of determining the effect of the changes(s). Method of determining change in Contract Price: Method of determining change in Contract Times: ❑ Unit Prices ❑ DBC's records ❑ Lump Sum ❑ Engineer's record ❑ Other ❑ Other Estimated increase (decrease) in Contract Price RECOMMENDED: t3y: Engineer Estimated change in Contract Time: Increase or decrease by calendar days. AUTHORIZED: IM Owner's Representative 38 EXHIBIT G COLLIER COUNTY ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES INTRODUCTION: /6,4T Florida law provides that written arbitration agreements are valid, irrevocable and enforceable. Unless otherwise provided for herein, the provisions of Florida Statutes, Chapter 682.01 et seq. shall be controlling. These provisions provide a mechanism to resolve claims or disputes that could potentially lead to litigation in construction contracts. The object is to attempt to settle claims by mutual agreement or to make a good faith effort to settle claims and disputes prior to litigation in court. The methods involve binding arbitration and pre -suit mediation. Arbitration is a quasi-judicial approach in which a dispute is resolved by a trier of fact after presentations by opposing parties. Its purpose is the speedy and economical resolution of disputes. Arbitration is traditionally a less formal process than court litigation. Mediation is a method used to settle disputes using an impartial person who listens to presentation by both sides and facilitates settlement negotiations between the parties. Collier County will utilize the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court Mediation and Arbitration Program, [hereinafter "Court Program "], to facilitate these procedures. 2. DEFINITIONS: 2.1 Claim: A demand by either party to a contract for an equitable adjustment of payment under a Collier County construction contract. A claim should cover all unresolved disputes existing at the time of presentation to arbitration or mediation. 2.2 Evidence: Oral testimony, written or printed material or other things presented to the arbitrator[s] or mediator[s] as proof of the existence or nonexistence of a pertinent fact. JURISDICTION: 3.1 A claim that does not exceed $250,000.00, excluding interest claimed, shall be submitted to binding arbitration. The parties may, by mutual consent, agree to a one - person or single arbitrator panel. Aggregate claims may total more than $250,000.00 for binding arbitration, but no single claim may exceed that amount. 3.2 A claim in excess of $250,000.00 brought pursuant to a construction contract with the county shall be submitted to mediation or binding arbitration if voluntarily agreed to by all parties. All claims less than $250,000.00 and all non - monetary claims brought pursuant to a construction contract with the county must be submitted to binding arbitration. 3.3 Prior to the institution of any litigation in a circuit court against Collier County, this Dispute Resolution process must be initiated. 3.4 Once the dispute resolution procedure has been initiated, a court of law may not consider the issues involved in the claim(s) until the dispute resolution process has been completed. 3.5 The claim must be a dispute between the County and the prime DBC. 3.6 The claim must be related to issues in dispute, which have been previously submitted in good faith to the County pursuant to this procedure and could not be resolved by negotiation. 3.8 Pendency of a claim or arbitration or mediation of a dispute shall not be a basis for delay of the DBC's performance under the contract. 39 /6j- 4. INITIATING DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURE: 4.1 Either party shall initiate a request for mediation or arbitration within thirty (30) calendar days after a denial of the claim after negotiation by County staff or no later than forty-five (45) calendar days after knowledge of a claim by claimant. In any event, no claim shall be made after the date when institution of legal or equitable proceedings based on such claims would be barred by the applicable statute of limitations. 4.2 Upon request, the County will make available to any party wishing to initiate arbitration or mediation, a procedural package containing the necessary forms. The forms shall include a Notice of Claim, a Request for Negotiation, a Request for Arbitration and a Request for Mediation. The County's Purchasing Department shall have these forms available and they will be included in the County's bid package. 4.3 Either party to the contract may initiate arbitration or mediation of a claim by submitting a Request for Arbitration or a Request for Mediation Claim Form to the Purchasing Department. The initiating party must indicate on the form whether or not. they will be represented by counsel during the hearing and may indicate a desire to resolve the claim based solely on a submittal of documents by the parties with no hearing. 4.4 The Claim Form shall be accompanied by: a. A brief summary of the nature of the dispute involved in each part of the claim. b. The amount of compensation being requested for each part of the claim along with supporting information. c. Copies of additional written information, not previously submitted under Section 3 including exhibits, intended to be used during the hearing to support the claim, excluding the contract documents. It is suggested that information be assembled in a tabbed notebook for ease of reference. d. Contract Time analysis if a Release of Liquidated Damages is included in the claim. e. No new or different claim, other than a change in the amount claimed, will be allowed once the time and date for the hearing has been set. f. If the arbitration panel or mediator determines that information known to a person not in attendance at the hearing or the mediation is essential to arriving at its decision or for the fair exercise of the mediation process, he or she may obtain a written affidavit from that person and enter such statement into the record. ADMINISTRATION OF ARBITRATION• 5.1 The respondent shall prepare a rebuttal to the claim and furnish a copy to the party requesting arbitration and to each of the members of the panel so that it is received at least fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the date scheduled for the hearing. 5.2 The parties shall agree to a mutually agreeable time and date for an arbitration hearing within 21 calendar days after receipt of the Request. In scheduling the time allotted for a hearing for complex claims, consideration will be given to the need for the greater amount of testimony or other information required in order for the arbitrators to gain a complete understanding of the issues, and if a party requests additional time, the arbitrators selected may continue the matter in 7- calendar day increments. A request for a continuance must be submitted to the arbitrators no later than 48 -hours prior to the commencement of the hearing. Once arbitration has begun, it may only be continued in 24 — hour increments. 5.3 The parties are expected to cooperate fully with each other in exchanging information prior to the hearing. In general, it is expected that the parties will have exchanged all documents relating to the claim during negotiations between them prior to arbitration being initiated. In any event, a full exchange of documents 40 /6T shall be completed no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the date set for the hearing. Generally, introduction of documents will not be allowed during the hearing which have not been previously been revealed to the other party. 5.4 Depositions and interrogatories will not be allowed except upon an order from the arbitrators to take sworn testimony of an unavailable witness. 6. INVOLVEMENT OF ATTORNEYS IN AN ARBITRATION HEARING: Counsel or another person who has sufficient authority to bind that party at any hearing may represent a party. A court reporter will be present, unless waived by both parties. a. The hearing will be informal and involvement of attorneys, if desired, is expected to be minimal. b. The parties shall have full opportunity to offer such evidence as is relevant and material to the dispute. c. Unnecessary extensive examination or cross - examination or extensive argument of legal points by attorneys representing the parties will not be permitted. The arbitrators may limit examination and argument as they deem appropriate. 7. CONDUCT OF EVIDENTIARY HEARING IN ARBITRATION: 7.1 The County or court reporter if present shall administer an oath to all persons who are to testify during the hearing. 7.2 Documents will be accepted and identified for the record. 7.3 Distinct and severable parts of a claim may be dealt with separately. 7.4 The order of proceeding will be for the party initiating arbitration to first present evidence to support their claim. At the beginning of their initial presentation, a party shall present a succinct statement of the issues and a position on each issue. Orderly discussion between the parties as evidence is presented will be allowed. 7.5 Reasonable attempts will be made to assure that all relevant evidence necessary to an understanding of the disputed issues and of value in resolving the claim is heard and that each party has the opportunity to adequately rebut all arguments and evidence submitted. The arbitration panel will be the sole judge of the relevance and materiality of evidence offered. 7.6 Conformance to legal rules of evidence shall not be necessary. 7.7 Members of the arbitration panel may ask questions of the parties for the purpose of clarification. 7.8 If substantial new information is submitted during a hearing, which the arbitration panel deems places the other party at a severe disadvantage because of inability to develop an adequate rebuttal, the panel may elect to extend the hearing to a later date as previously set forth herein. a. A stenographic record of any hearings by a Certified Court Reporter or any previously recorded testimony or document prepared under oath, such as an affidavit is admissible. b. Each party shall bear an equal share of the cost of the arbitration panel. c. Each party shall pay its own costs and attorney fees. 41 IOT d. All arbitration shall be concluded within one -half (1/2) day and all mediation shall be conducted within one (1) day unless continued pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.2 herein. ADMINISTRATION OF MEDIATION: 8.1 The respondent shall prepare a mediation summary regarding the claim and furnish a copy to the parry requesting mediation and to the mediator so that it is received at least fourteen (14) calendar days prior to the date scheduled for the mediation. 8.2 The parties shall agree to a mutually agreeable time and date for the mediation within 21 calendar days after receipt of the Request. In scheduling the time allotted for complex claims, consideration will be given to the need for a greater amount of information required in order for the mediator to gain a complete understanding of the issues, and if a parry requests additional time, the mediator selected may continue the matter in 7- calendar day increments. A request for a continuance must be submitted to the mediator no later than 48 -hours prior to the commencement of the mediation. Once mediation has begun, it may only be continued in 24 — hour increments. 8.3 The parties are expected to cooperate fully with each other in exchanging information. In general, it is expected that the parties will have exchanged all documents relating to the claim during negotiations between them prior to mediation. In any event, full exchange of documents shall be completed no later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the date set for the mediation. 8.4 Each parry shall bear an equal share of the cost of the mediator. 8.5 Each party shall pay its own costs and attorney fees. 8.6 All mediation shall be conducted within one (1) day unless continued pursuant to the provisions of Section 5.2 herein. 8.7 If a party fails to appear at a duly noticed mediation without good cause it shall bear the costs of the mediator, attorneys' fees and other costs. The County or any other public entity required to conduct its business pursuant to Florida Statutes, chapter 286, that party shall be deemed to appear at a mediation conference by the physical presence of a representative with authority to negotiate on behalf of the entity and to recommend settlement to the appropriate decision - making body of the entity. 8.8 A party is deemed to appear if the party or its representative having full authority to settle without further consultation, the party's counsel or a representative of the insurance carrier who has full authority to settle up to the amount of the claimant's last demand or policy limits, whichever is less, without further consultation. 8.9 The mediator shall at all times be in control of the mediation and the procedures to be followed in the mediation. 8.10 Counsel shall be permitted to communicate privately with their clients. In the discretion of the mediator, mediation may proceed in the absence of counsel. 8.11 The mediator may meet and consult privately with any party or parties or their counsel, if any. 8.12 If a partial or final agreement is reached, it shall be reduced to writing and signed by the parties and their counsel, if any. 8.13 If the parties do not reach an agreement as to any matter as a result of mediation, the mediator shall prepare and distribute to each party a report indicating the lack of an agreement without comment or recommendation. With the consent of the parties, the mediator's report may also identify the outstanding legal issues or other action by any party that, if resolved or completed, would facilitate the possibility of a settlement. 9. COMPENSATION OF THE ARBITRATION PANEL OR MEDIATOR: 42 Joi- Arbitrators and Mediators shall be paid at the rate of $150.00 an hour, or the current rate for the Court program. r An additional fee of 25% shall be payable to the Court Program for administration of any arbitration, but shall not be assessed for a mediation. The parties shall equally share all costs and shall remit all charges to the Court Program upon the conclusion of the ADR Process. 10. MEMBERSHIP: 10.1 The Arbitration Panel will consist of one member selected by the County and one member selected by the DBC, unless the parties agree to utilize the Court Program's arbitrators. The Court Program will select the third member of any panel and the third member will act as Chairman for all panel activities. Any single arbitrator will be selected through the Court Program. 10.2 All mediators and the Chair of any arbitration panel shall appear on the Court Program's list of persons approved to serve as mediators and arbitrators. 10.3 It is desirable that all arbitration panel members have experience with the type of construction involved in this project. 10.4 It is imperative that mediators and arbitration panel members show no partiality to either the DBC or the County, nor have any conflict of interest. 10.5 The criteria and limitations for mediators and arbitration panel membership is as follows: a. The person[s] selected will not have any direct or indirect ownership or financial interest in the Owner, the DBC awarded the project, the CEI consulting firm selected for the project, in any subcontractor or supplier of the project, nor in other panel members. Each panel member shall provide a statement of no known conflict. b. No arbitrator or mediator shall have had any prior involvement in the project of a nature that could be construed to compromise his /her ability to impartially resolve disputes. c. No arbitrator or mediator will be employed by the DBC awarded the project, the CEI consulting firm selected for the project or by any subcontractor or supplier of the project during the life of the Contract, except as a panel member or mediator. d. The Florida Rules of Court Rules 10.200 et seq., Part II of the Rules for Mediators and Part II of the Rules for Court Appointed Arbitrators shall apply, except Rule 11.110 and Rules 10.870 through 10.900. e. Rules 1.720(c), (d), and (e) of the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure governing mediation are incorporated herein. 11. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS: a. Arbitrators and mediators shall be agents and employees of the County for purposes of tort immunity resulting from any actions taken while conducting the hearing[s] or the mediation as long as these procedures are followed. Such status shall not create a conflict of interest. 43 /-bx ' COLLIER COUNTY ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAIM FORM Claimant Claim No. Vs. Respondent NOTICE OF CLAIM Claimant, , hereby notifies , Respondent of its Claim and requests the institution of the Collier County Alternative Dispute Resolution Procedure. Name of Project: Date of Contract: Date Claim: Sqmp2ga of the Claim: Estimated Amount of Claim: Date: Claim Filed by: 44 Claimant Vs Respondent REQUEST FOR ARBITRATION Claimant, Name of Project: Date of Contract: Party Requesting Negotiation: Date: Received by: Date Request Received: Comments: 1OX COLLIER COUNTY ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAIM FORM Claim No. hereby requests negotiation of the above - referenced Claim. 45 /OT COLLIER COUNTY ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAIM FORM Claimant Vs. Respondent REQUEST FOR PRE -SUIT MEDIATION Claimant, Claim ,„._Name of Project: Date of Contract: PartRequesting Arbitration: Date: Received by: Date Request Received: Comments: Claim No. hereby requests PRE -SUIT MEDIATION of the above - referenced 46 /OT COLLIER COUNTY ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION CLAIM FORM Claimant Vs Respondent REQUEST FOR NEGOTIATION OF CLAIM Claimant/Respondent BY THE PARTIES. ,,.,,Name of Project: Date of Notice of Claim: Date of Request for Negotiation of the Dispute: Comments: Signed: Claim No. hereby REQUESTS NEGOTIATION OF THE CLAIM 47 /03- TIME CHART FOR ADR: Within the Following Time Periods Following the Notice of Claim or the Date of the Occurrence Underlying the Claim, Whichever is First, the Following Matters Must Occur, [All days are Calendar Days]: Up to fourteen (14) days after occurrence or Notice of Claim, [whichever is first]: The matter must be negotiated with County Staff. Within seven (7) days of receipt of Notice of Claim: Staff shall prepare a written rebuttal. Within fifteen (15) Days of Notice of Claim: Negotiation of dispute with County staff must be completed. Within thirty (30) Days after Negotiations with County Staff ends or within 45 days of the date of the occurrence: a Request for Arbitration or Mediation Must be filed. After a Request for Arbitration or Mediation is Filed: Within twenty -one (21) days: The Mediation or Arbitration shall be set including the names of the participants and all relevant claim documents forwarded to the Mediator or Arbitrators. No later than fourteen (14) days prior to date of Mediation: A written rebuttal to any claim must be served on opposing party and Mediator or Arbitrators. No later than forty-eight (48) Hours Prior to the date of the Mediation or Arbitration: Any request for a continuance must be filed with the Arbitrators or Mediator with a copy to County Staff. Once Mediation or Arbitration begins it may be continued for only twenty -four (24) hours at a time with the consent of the Arbitrators or Mediator. Within fourteen (14) days of conclusion of Arbitration or Mediation: Written decision must be issued indicating that a certain conclusion has been reached or an impasse entitling claimant to proceed to court litigation. Both parties must undertake all ADR proceedings in good faith. 48 EXHIBIT H PUBLIC PAYMENT BOND CONTRACT NO. 022602 BOND No. 103710080 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That MEI'CALF & EDDY, INC. 3740 Executive Way, Miramar, FL 33025 as Principal, and TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY oa mPANY OF AMERICA , as Surety, located at One Tower Square, Hartford, Cr 06183 (Business Address) are held and firmly bound t0 CULLIER UJIUNEY, kLORIDA, Public i i ies ivision, Collier County Government Center, 3301 Tamiami Trail, Bldg. H, Naples, FL 34112 as Obligee in the sum of FOUR MILLION THREE HUNDRED THREE THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED NINETY SIX AND 00 /100THS ($ 4,303,196.00 ) for the payment whereof we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns, jointly and severally. WHEREAS, Principal has entered into a contract dated as of the 26TH day of FEBRUARY 20021 with Obligee for NORTH WATER TREATMENT PLANT WELL FIELD EXPANSION in accordance with drawings and specifications, which contract is incorporated by reference and made a part hereof, and is referred to as the Contract. THE CONDITION OF THIS BOND is that if Principal: Promptly makes payment to all claimants as defined in Section 255.05(1), Florida Statutes, supplying Principal with labor, materials or supplies, used directly or indirectly by Principal in the prosecution of the work provided for in the Contract, then is bond is void; otherwise it remains in full force. Any changes in or under the Contract and compliance or noncompliance with any formalities connected with the Contract or the changes do not affect Sureties obligation under this Bond. The provisions of this bond are subject to the time limitations of Section 255.05(2). In no event will the Surety be liable in the aggregate to claimants for more than the penal sum of this Payment Bond, regardless of the number of suits that may be filed by claimants. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above parties have executed this instrument this 11TH day of MARC[m , 2002, the name of each party being affixed and these presents duly signed by its under- signed representative, pursuant to authority of its governing body. 52 Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Witnesses as to Principal PRINCIPAL: DD 7' p7A IF /6%7 STATE OF,LO�/ D/} COUNTY OF D The fMie instrument was acknowledged before me this � day of 4x-9e>1 _, 2002, by b D, 1,4 6 et) f9p-6 , asS%-:A)ioz 1k- yrs, i)F;�r of r7*7C'c44-F- - -,a -F fkb.1 o L corporation, on behalf of the corporation. HgAOe is personally known to me as identification and did (did not) take an oath. My Commission Expires. F [p LINDA M. PAULISON c My Comm Exp. 419/2002 ~ Pueuc ' No. CC 732340 [�rPvsw&n0y Wmm [ I Odw I.D. (AFFIX OFFICIAL SEAL) ATTEST: Witness as to Surety NAME (Legibly Printed) Notary Public, State of FI-0 eiD,9 Commission No. Ce 23 -;t 5$40 SURETY: TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA (Printed Name) N- 53 One Tower Square Hartford, CT 06183 (Business Address) (Authorized Signature) (Printed Name) Wtn sses STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Dade /4 T As Attorney in VaCt / F1. Resident Agent (Attach Power /of Attorney) William L. Parker 1001 Brickell Bay Drive, Suite 1100 Miami, FL 33131 (Business Address) William L. Parker (Printed Name) (305) 372 -8087 (Telephone Number) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 11 day of March , 2002, by William L. Parker , as Attorney- In -Fact Of Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of AmericaSUrety, on behalf of Surety. He /She is personally known to me OR has produced Perso all Kn as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. My Commission Expires: (AFFIX OFFICIAL SEAL) Omelel Seel GICELLE PAJON pltIGAL Nonry holic. Stan of Florida out Comm. Expires Jan 4, 2005 No,CC 991858 roll Name: Gicelle Pa_jon (Legibly Printed) 54 Notary Public, State of F1 on ri n Commission No.: CC 991858 EXHIBIT H / T PUBLIC PERFORMANCE BOND BOND NO. 103710080 CONTRACT NO. 022602 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That ME'TC'AI F & EDDY, INC., 3740 Executive way, Miramar, FL 33025 , as Principal, and TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA , as Surety, located at one Tower Square, Hartford, Cr 06183 (Business Address) are held and firmly bound to COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, Public Utilities Division, Collier County Government Centei 3301 Tamiami Trail, Bldg. H, Naples, FL 34112 , as Obligee in the sum of FOUR MILLION THREE HUNDRE T4M TU-E*U CNE HLNDE;ED NEEIY SIM $4 , 303,196.00 ) for the payment whereof we bond ourselves, our heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns, jointly and severally. WHEREAS, Principal has entered into a contract dated as of the 26TH day of FEBRUARY 2002, with Obligee for NORTH WATER TREATMENT PLANT WELL FIELD EXPANSION in accordance with drawings and specifications, which contract is incorporated by reference and made a part hereof, and is referred to as the Contract. THE CONDITION OF THIS BOND is that if Principal: ._. 1. Performs the Contract at the times and in the manner prescribed in the Contract; and 2. Pays Obligee any and all losses, damages, costs and attorneys' fees that Obligee sustains because of any default by Principal under the Contract, including, but not limited to, all delay damages, whether liquidated or actual, incurred by Obligee; and 3. Performs the guarantee of all work and materials furnished under the Contract for the time specified in the Contract, then this bond is void; otherwise it remains in full force. Any changes in or under the Contract and compliance or noncompliance with any formalities connected with the Contract or the changes do not affect Sureties obligation under this Bond. 55 I b'T The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no changes, extensions of time, alterations or additions to the terms of the Contract or other work to be performed thereunder, or the specifications referred to therein shall in anywise affect its obligations under this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such changes, extensions of time, alterations or additions to the terms of the Contract or to work or to the specifications. This instrument shall be construed in all respects as a common law bond. It is expressly understood that the time provisions and statute of limitations under Section 255.05, Florida Statutes, shall not apply to this bond. In no event will the Surety be liable in the aggregate to Obligee for more than the penal sum of this Performance Bond regardless of the number of suits that may be filed by Obligee. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above parties have executed this instrument this 11TH day of mARCH , 2002, the name of each party being affixed and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative, pursuant to authority of its governing body. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of ,i-l- Witnesses as to Principal STATE OF Al-oQi M PRINCIPAL: ME'=F & EDDY, INC. COUNTY OF Aeo The foregoing i strument was acknowledged before me this %-4 day of ve- C , 2002, by /C' /� R � - (� f � D a s 5i �ioe 1/iC'E1 ` vES iz * 3 .T of se- 5 b D y , a ., tJ corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He /sly is persdnally known to me as identification and did take an oath. 56 My Commission Expires: LINDA M. PAUIISON Q 9 My Comm Exp. 4/9/2002 «� Pueuc ' P�o CC 732340 l4wwn [) Olfwr I.D. (AFFIX OFFICIAL SEAL) ATTEST: Witness as to Surety l Witne se 1101.,T �ai4 �, ighature of Notary) Name: (Legibly Printed) Notary Public, State of 'X71-dk/bw Commission No. C?C �9J -11a6 SURETY: TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA (Printed Name) One Tower Square Hartford, CT 06183 (Business Address) (Authorized Signature) (Printed Name) OR l� As Attorn in Fact / Fl. Resident Agent (Attach P wer of Attorney) William L. Parker 57 1001 Brickell Bay Drive, Suite 1100 Miami, FL 33131 (Business Address) William L. Parker (Printed Name) (305) 372 -9950 (Telephone Number) STATE OF Florida COUNTY OF Dade /0 a- The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 11 th day of March , 2002, by ,wi 7iam L Parker as Attorney -In -Fact of Tr^vPl ers CaGnal t; and surety Company of AmPricaSurety, on behalf of Surety. He/She is personally known tome OR has produced Personal l y Known_ as identfication and who did take an oath. My Commission Expires: (Signature Notary) Name: Gicelle Pai on (Legibly Printed) (AFFIX OFFICIAL SEAL) Notary Public, State of Florida Commission No.: CC 991858 E Seal Y PAJON pFFICfAL te of Florida ay SEAL Jan 4, 2005 1858 58 y0T TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA Hartford, Connecticut 06183 -906: POWER OF ATTORNEY AND CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY OF ATTORNEY(S) -IN -FACT KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Connecticut, and having its principal office in the City of Hartford, County of Hartford, State of Connecticut, hath made, constituted and appointed, and does by these presents make, constitute and appoint Joe Pietrangelo, Kaaren Reagan, William L. Parker or Olga O. Rogue * * of, Coral Gables, FL, its true and lawful Attorneys) -in -Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred to sign, execute and acknowledge, at any place within the United States, or, if the following line be filled in, within the area there designated , the following instrument(s): by his /her sole signature and act, any and all bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and other writings obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking and any and all consents incident thereto and to bind TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, thereby as fully and to the same extent as if the same were signed by the duly authorized officers of TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, and all the acts of said Attorney(s)-in -Fact, pursuant to the authority herein given, are hereby ratified and confirmed. This appointment is made under and by authority of the following Standing Resolutions of said Company, which Resolutions are now in full force and effect: VOTED: That each of the following officers: Chairman, Vice Chairman, President, Any Executive Vice President, Any Group Executive, Any Senior Vice President, Any Vice President, Any Assistant Vice President, Any Secretary, Any ,..Assistant Secretary, may from time to time appoint Resident Vice Presidents, Resident Assistant Secretaries, Attorneys-in- . act, and Agents to act for and on behalf of the Company and may give any such appointee such authority as his certificate of authority may prescribe to sign with the Company's name and seal with the Company's seal bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and other writings obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking, and any of said officers or the Board of Directors may at any time remove any such appointee and revoke the power and authority given hirrj or her. VOTED: That any bond, recognizance, contract of indemnity, or writing obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking shall be valid and binding upon the Company when (a) signed by the Chairman, the Vice Chairman, the President, an Executive Vice President, a Group Executive, a Senior Vice President, a Vice President, an Assistant Vice President or by a Resident Vice President, pursuant to the power prescribed in the certificate of authority of such Resident Vice President, and duly attested and sealed with the Company's seal by a Secretary or Assistant Secretary or by a Resident Assistant Secretary, pursuant to the power prescribed in the certificate of authority of such Resident Assistant Secretary; or (b) duly executed (under seal, if required) by one or more Attorneys -in -Fact pursuant to the power prescribed in his or their certificate or certificates of authority. This Power of Attorney and Certificate of Authority is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by authority of the following Standing Resolution voted by the Board of Directors of TRAVELERS CASUALTY . AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, which Resolution is now in full force and effect: VOTED: That the signature of each of the following officers: Chairman, Vice Chairman, President, Any Executive Vice President, Any Group Executive, Any Senior Vice President, Any Vice President, Any Assistant Vice President, Any Secretary, Any Assistant Secretary, and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any power of attorney or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Resident Vice Presidents, Resident Assistant Secretaries or Attomeys -in -Fact for purposes only of executing and attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such power of attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal-shall be valid*.and binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and certified by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and iding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached. (over) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY to be signed by its Senior Vice President, and its corporate seal to be hereto of zed this Ist d AMERICA of July,1997his instrument rE OF CONNECTICUT AND SUgpry )SS. Hartford �► —•e NAMFORD, < COUNTY OF HARTFORD W CONN. e TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA By George W. Thompson Senior Vice President On this 1st day of July, 1997, before me personally came GEORGE W. THOMPSON to me known, who, being by me duly swom, did depose and say: that he/she is Senior Vice President of TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, the corporation described in and which executed the above instrument; that he /she knows the seal of said corporation; that the seal affixed to the said instrument is such corporate seal; and that he /she executed the said instrument on behalf of the corporation by authority of his/her office under the Standing Resolutions thereof. G.TL7� To MY commission expires June 30, 2001 Notary Public Marie C. Tetreault _RTIFICATE I, the undersigned, Assistant Secretary of TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, a stock corporation of the State of Connecticut, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing and attached Power of Attorney and Certificate of Authority remains in full force and has not been revoked; and furthermore, that the Standing Resolutions of the Board of Directors, as set forth in the Certificate of Authority, are now in force. Signed and Sealed at the Home Office of the Company, in the City of Hartford, State of Connecticut. Dated this 11th day of March , = 2002 `y �o sueErr COO 's N CONK T By:' Rose Gonsoulin Assistant Secretary -2435 (7 -95) "s Mazsh USA Inc. 3/13/02 12:23 PAGE 2/2 RightFAX CERTIFICATE NUMBER -s�> � ,< - .- rawm7mm LOS-000272112 -00 PRODUCER E IS ISSUED AS AMATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CON FERS Marsh Risk & Insurance Services THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER OTHER THAN THOSE PROVIDED N THE License No. 0437153 TFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE 777 South Figueroa Street E POLICES DESCRIBED HEREIN. Los Angeles, CA 90017 Attn: Denise Turner (213) 346-5650 COMPANIES APPORDING COVEIeAlmr COMPANY 575- 00000— A National Union Fire Insurance Company INSURED COMPANY M &E MIRAMAR B N/A 3740 EXECUTIVE WAY MIRAMAR, FL 33025 CCMPMY C United National Insurance Company COMPANY D National Union Fire Insurance Company of PA _- .:--:: THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE DESCRIBED HERE3N HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED HEREIN FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOMITHSrANOING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT IMTH RESPECTTO WHICH THE CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, CONDITIONS AND EXCLUSONS OF SUCH POLICIES LIMITS SHONM MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAD CLAIMS CO LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICYNUMBER POLICYEFFECTIVE DATE (M MIDD /YY) POLICY EXPIRATION DATE (MMIDDIYY) LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY GENERAL AGGREGATE $ 2,000,000 A COMMERCA_ GENERAL LIABILITY RMGL1439W 04/01/01 04/01102 X PRODUCTS - CCMPrOPAGG $ 2,000,000 CLAMSMADE OCCUR PERSONAL &ADVINJURY $ 2,000,000 OANER'S & CONTRACTOR'S PROT EACH OCCURRENCE $ 2,000,000 FIRE DAMAGE (Any onalre) $ 1,000,000 MED EXP (My me peram) $ A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY RMCA 3209855 (AOS) 04/07/00 04/01/02 COMBINED SNGLE LIMIT $ 1,000,000 X A ANY AUTO RMCA 5348478 (TX) 04/01/01 04/01/02 BODILY INJURY $ ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS (Per pgaw) BODILYINJURY (Per aoddent) $ HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS PROPERTY DAMAGE $ WAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY -EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY'. _'_;::,:,`t''" -"� "- EACH ACCIDENT $ AGGREGATE $ EXCESS LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE $ 1,000,000 D X UMBRELLAFORM BE 3575639 04/01/01 04/01102 AGGREGATE $ 1,000,000 OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FORM $ EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY TORY LIMITS ER EL EACH ACCIDENT $ THE PROPRIETOR/ IINCL. PARTNERSIEXECUMVE OFFICERSARE, EXCL EL DISEASE-POLICY LIMIT $ EL DISEASE —EACH EMPLOYEE $ C D7WR PLP- 2000104 04/07/00 04101103 $1,000,000 ARCHITECTS & ENG. LAIMS MADE' PER CLAIWAGGREGATE PROFESSIONAL LIAB. [C DEFENSE INCLUDED DESCRIPTION OF OPERATI ONSILOCATIONSIVEHICLESISPECIAL ITEMS (LIMITS MAYBE SUBJECTTO DEDUCTIBLESOR RETENTIONS) RE: NORTH WATER TREATMENT PLANT WELL FIELD EXPANSION, CONTRACT #022602. CERTIFICATE HOLDER IS NAMDED AS ADDITIONAL INSURED FOR GL & AL COVERAGES, BUT ONLY AS RESPECTS WORK PERFORMED BY OR ON BEHALF OF THE NAMED INSURED. WAIVER OF SUBROGATION IS HEREBY GRANTED IN FAVOR OF CERTIFICATE HOLDER. - a SHOULD ANY OF THE POLICES DESCRIBED HEREIN BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF THE INSURER AFFORDING COVERAGE VNLL EI XW WL 'in DAYS wRITTEN NOTICE TO THE Ix Public Utilities Division Collier County Government Center CERTIFICATE HOLDER wwo HEREIN, 3301 Tamiami Trail, Bldg H Naples, FL 34112 7�ARAWest ey hInD-1 'D-IDSM) 1 A: L'Al AON P.02/02 TOTAL P.02 U KA ;a 3112/2002 PRODUCER DM THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, Aon Risk Services, Inc. of Southern California 707 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 6000 EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW Los Angeles, California 90017 (213) 630-3200 COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE WWAW the State PA l� T LEI I A Ins Co of of CODE SUB -CODE OOWANY LETTER B American Home Assurance Co INSURED COMPANY C Metcalf & Eddy, Inc. 3740 Executive Way Lunim COMPANY Miramar, FL 33025 Lerm D COMPANY E Lurm iU Ow REV R"i THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN. THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS, AND CONDMO14S OF SUCH POLICIES. THE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. CO TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POUCY appwnvp POUCYEMPAT*N ALL LIMITS IN THOUSANDS LTR GATE PAMMONn DATE PAMCDrM SENERALLPMM OMMMAGOMOATE $ EDCOWAMOIALOSPARALUARIUTY PRODUCTS40MOPS AGGREGATE $ ❑ CLAM MAW F-1 OCCUMOMM PERSONAL • ADVERTISM NAWY $ F-1 OW RS A COMRACTOM PROTECTIVE EACH OOCURRENOE $ ❑ FIN DAMUM (ANY ONE FIFO $ ❑ LARMAL WOWSE (AW ONE PERSW AUTOMOBILE LULITY ❑ ANY AUTO eaL BODILY INJURY ❑ ALL OV*QD AUTOS ❑ sagntmAUTOS 0"Pwtsm) SODLY 01JURY ❑ HMEDAUTOS 1:1 NOF4,O4WNEDAU10S 01ERAWDOM 11 GARAW UAINUTY 11 PROPERTY DAMAGE EXCESS UASKM EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE ❑ UMBRELLA FORM $ ❑ OTHER THAN UMORIA FORM A WORKERS' COMPENSATION RMWC 527-65-53 (AOS) 3/23/2001 3123/2002 STATUTORY B AND RMWC 6274Z54 (CA) 3/23/2DO1 :Y23/2002 $ 1,000 MACH A=WWn EMPLOYERS' LIABLITY $ 1,000 (DISEASE POLICY UVM 1,000 (DISEASE EACH SIVLOYM OTHER DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONOLOCATIONSIVEHICLEGIREBTRICTION&WECIAL ITEMS: MEMI7565 Job: North Water Treatment P" Well Field Expansion Conftd 0022802 A Waiver of SubrogNOn Is afforded the cardficate holder where rSqUlr9d by written cOnh9a MIN SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES 13E CANCELLED BEFORE THE HOL E EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL X I Public Utilities DMallon 30 DAYS wRrrTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, AuMiller County Government center SLIT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALLIMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY 41 1 w 3U W 1 Tamllaml Trail, Building OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY, ITS 44E-4rs OR !eWEwrA-nvEs. 1 maples, FL 34112 Attn: James McGee AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Lox TOTAL P.02 Apr -24 -03 11:06am From— T -602 P 0011001 F -543 12V OFFICE OF THF. COUNTY Its EROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Maturen Kenyon, Supervisor, Cleric of Courts FROM: lJichael W. Pettit, Assistant County Attorney %/ / DATE: April 24, 2003 RE: Settlement re Plaintiff Thomas Wiijerski in Case 95- 3067 =CA, 95- 2955 -CA in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Collier County, Florida, and Case 99 -303, in tho U.S. District Court for the Nliddle District of Florida This memo is to confirm that settlement was reached by the Plaintiff Thomas Wajerski and Defendant Collier County in the referenced "eases. Please let us know if you need anything further_ MWP /ntb cc: David C. Weigel, County Attorney h*j tWblic/L.itip.3iimVrAosed caws! waierski.mcmo to miuree0 kcayon re sa de—al.04?303 G 12A February 26, 2002 CLOSED SESSION MEETING February 26, 2002 OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Board of County Commissioners in and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to law and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 2 p.m. In CLOSED SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, Board of County Commission Conference Room, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: James Coletta VICE - CHAIRMAN: Tom Henning Donna Fiala Fred Coyle ALSO PRESENT: Tom 011iff, County Manager David C. Weigel, County Attorney Michael W. Pettit, Assistant County Attorney David Bryant, Esquire Page 1 of 4 it February 6, 2002 (Commissioner Fiala not present.) MR. WEIGEL: Well, I'll just mention just very briefly here that this closed session under the Sunshine Law is provided by statute, and the records of this proceeding are totally on the record as we conduct our business here today. And the subject matter of the meeting shall be confined to settlement negotiations or strategy sessions related to litigation expenditures. And I think you'll note from Item 12 -B that was on the agenda February 12th continued over to today as the companion item following this closed session discussion is that the element included discussion of settlement -- (Commissioner Fiala enters.) MR. WEIGEL: -- and the costs related to the litigation. So with that, I'd like to turn over briefly to Mike and then to David to talk about this agenda item. MR. PETTIT: Commissioners, Mike Pettit. I need to give you the factors that are important in settlement negotiations. I want to give you a little bit of background. This litigation has been going on in one form or another for seven years. This -- the county attorney's office represented early on -- and actually, Mr. Bryant, who is here with us, represented the county, and at the time he left and went into private practice the risk manager and director felt his familiarity with the case and Mr. Waj erski's claim is such that he wanted him to retain that representation which he has, and he's been through a series of proceedings with Mr. Wajerski. The settlement agreement that was brought forth a few weeks ago was negotiated by our claims adjuster at the behest, I think, primarily of our outside counsel. It was approved by a risk department, but really Mr. Bryant -- neither Mr. Bryant nor me functioning as in -house counsel -- Mr. Bryant is the trial counsel -- had involvement in these negotiations. And as you can see, there was a negotiation to make a recommendation to the board of $85,000. Page 2 f 1 r February 26, 200 -2 Some of the factors that I think are important to keep in mind are if the litigation continues there is a potential that we would be -- have to get new trial counsel for a variety of reasons, one of which is Mr. Waj erski has sued Mr. Bryant during this process. In addition, Mr. Waj erski has filed notices of claim or have orally threatened additional claims, which would be new events under our insurance coverage, which would mean to the extent they set a tort we would be on the hook for the first $100,000 of cost with respect to those claims. And I think it would be necessary -- even if Mr. Bryant had to leave representation, I could take over the defense of the county, but I can't take over the defense of at least eight individuals, not counting the sheriffs folks who have been sued. Some of those individuals are people like Jennifer Edwards who -- you know, supervisor of elections, Jim Mitchell, the clerk's office. We've also got Tom Whitecotton who's been sued in the clerk's office. We're also representing a former expert witness who appeared for the county in some of these cases, as well as a former county employee such as Lynn Day and current county employees like John Walker. And, generally speaking, we have not as an office -- this is a factor to take into account -- represented individuals. Now should new claims be filed, if this settlement doesn't happen, the excess carrier, I think, will be responsible for paying outside counsel fees. But that's another factor to keep in mind. We would be responsible for costs on these new claims up to 100,000. In addition, the excess carrier has agreed to contribute 67,500 to the settlement looking to us to pay the other $17,500. I've had discussions over the last couple weeks with the claims adjuster who was involved in negotiating the settlement. He indicates that the excess carrier is unwilling to go higher at this point in time and is unwilling to contribute the full amount. Page 3 12A February 52002 This morning I had discussions with counsel for the sheriff and sheriffs deputy who are also part of these lawsuits. And the sheriff is willing to contribute $2,500 if he can be added in on our settlement which would then, obviously, assuming Mr. Waj erski would accept $85,000 and include the sheriff in that release, would reduce the amount the county would be contributing as well. One other factor that's out there I think you need to be aware of is Mr. Waj erski whether -- with validity or not has threatened to file RICO claims against the county. Those probably would not be covered by insurance and, again, we would have to -- I guess certain individuals, county individuals, there would have to be decisions how it would be handled, who was going to represent whom. Those are the factors, quite frankly, I think the excess carrier took into account when pushed with -- to get settlement here and was willing to contribute the $67,500 that's offered. And the fact that, as I said, this litigation's been going on in one form or another for seven years and doesn't look like its end is in sight at this point. It's just a reality. With that I think I've given you the background factors to keep in mind that you may want to think about as you want to agree to this settlement or take some other action in the future at some point in time. I'd like you to hear what Mr. Bryant has to say about the litigation. I should say that Mr. Bryant is -- I think there are five cases at least. Mr. Bryant won one of them at trial. MR. BRYANT: Won two of them. MR. PETTIT: Won two of them at trial, okay. MR. BRYANT: Thank you, Michael, Mr. Chairman, Commissioners. Pleasure to be here with you this afternoon. It's distasteful for me to represent to you that I think you ought to settle this because as David knows and Michael knows and you that have met me before, I'm very -- and Tom, obviously, because we've done 0 February J,g A 02 some battles together on the same side -- I've always been very tenacious in representing the county, and we've had a lot of success, not only in Waj erski but in other cases that I have been fortunate enough to represent the county in. So I haven't gone to the board -- this is the very first time I've gone to the board and said I think it is in your best interest to settle this matter. The reason I tell you this is because you've got to step back and look at the history of this case. It evolved out of a helicopter pilot that we fired back in 1995 who had a number of psychological and performance problems that we believed while performing his job. Well, his attitude hasn't changed over the last seven years, and I don't say that tongue in cheek. I mean, seriously, because he has literally sued everybody that he's come into contact with, like Michael said, myself included, and everybody that was involved in our two -week trial where he was asking for $750,000 and he got zero. I used to be an attorney -- state attorney's office in Tampa and prosecuted for a long time there, and I prosecuted for the Department of Professional Regulation for the Board of Medicine all over Florida, and I have used this analogy to this case. It's like a prisoner case -- and I don't know if any of you are familiar with this, but if you've been in government, especially in the corrections or law enforcement area, you see these cases. And what happens is you convict somebody and what happens then is they go to jail and they start suing everybody. Well, you can't do anything to them because they're in a cell. You can't put inside of a cell inside of a cell, and you can't stop them from suing people. So even though their claims are 99 percent not meritorious and just salacious, you still have to defend them because you have exceptional exposure. That's what we've got here with Mr. Waj erski. I never thought we'd get to the point where he would take this amount to settle this case. And I commend Michael and his work Page 5 12A February 26, 2002 with the outside carrier and everyone else that has led and gotten to this point. And the reason I think it's important that you seriously consider settling this is two reasons. One, we've got the federal lawsuit that is on the third motion to dismiss. I got his first two complaints dismissed, but there is a third one. It's almost 100 pages long. I sincerely believe eventually the federal judge and the -- basically the federal judge's law clerk who is going to be tasked with responding to that motion is going to find something there that is going to stick where that lawsuit will go forward. Federal litigation is very expensive and very time consuming. As an example, last year in the State of Florida EEOC litigation in Florida, the average claim that was recovered was $250,000. The average attorneys' fees to get to that point was $350,000. Civil rights litigation is very, very expensive, and it takes a special type of litigator to do that because you have to deal in the federal sector, and a lot of attorneys don't. So that case, if it goes forward, either with my representation or without my representation of the county, is going to cost the county a serious amount of money. The whistle - blower case that we won is pending a motion for new trial. I sincerely believe that we will win that; however, that means that Mr. Waj erski then will appeal that case because as long as he has a computer and as long as he can use it and as long as there's a courthouse where he can go to seek what he thinks is his just rewards, he is going to be at the courthouse door, and it's going to take your time and it's going to take your money. And even though it is most distasteful to tell you that this is something you ought to seriously consider settling -- and I recommend that you settle it, mainly because of the future exposure. And Michael hit on a very important point. This new case that he says he's going to file, even though I don't believe it's meritorious -- I know it's not meritorious, but I don't Page 6 12A t February 26, 2002 believe it has any standing -- it's going to mean you're going to have to respond to it because he always seeks damages, the last one at 1.5 million in the federal case. And so you've got -- you just can't forget about it. So you've got to task attorneys and staff to handle that. Well, that RICO case or whatever this new litigation he's going to craft in his own mind -- and you've got to realize he represents himself. He doesn't have an attorney anymore. So it's his mission, his crusade against Collier County that new -- new recording number is going to require that the county spend up to $100,000 under their self - insured retention program. So if you can get out of this for less than $20,000 and the people that are in it individually like Jeff Walker, like Jennifer Edwards who did nothing, but she's a defendant that I've defending. And all of you know Jennifer. She's the nicest person in the world. Ross Sasser who was our outstanding expert from Washington and Atlanta who used to be with the FAA and with the Go Team for the Federal Aviation Administration, he's got sued. I got sued. Everybody that basically participated in that case and testified for the county and testified truthfully and testified correctly and the county won has been sued. Which is only the tip of the iceberg. And I don't mean to belabor this, and if you've got any questions I'll be more than glad to answer them. COMMISSIONER COYLE: How -- I'm sorry. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Go ahead. You started. COMMISSIONER COYLE: How can we be sure that settling this particular lawsuit with him will stop? MR. BRYANT: That's an excellent -- COMMISSIONER COYLE: He can keep doing this for the next 20 years even though he settled. MR. BRYANT: That's an excellent question, Commissioner Coyle, and Michael has crafted an excellent release and settlement Page 7 12° February 26, 2002 document. In fact, we've had a lot of discussion about that and what it does -- it's a global settlement because we always told Waj erski that if we settle anything, it settles everything from the day we ever heard of you to today when you sign it. And that's what that release and settlement says. It says that it's over with against the county, its employees, its former employees, its expert witnesses. It's as ironclad as you can get. That doesn't mean he might try something, but then if Michael handles it or I handle it or whoever, the enforcement of that settlement agreement is totally different than litigating the factual issues that we're litigating now, because now we're litigating all of his claims of graft, corruption, and everything else. He truly believes that he has -- is the only person that shined light on the county and he's exposed everything, and he truly believes that. If you've dealt with him as long as I have, you would see that I'm not being facetious about that. I mean, in his mind he truly believes that he's right. -But that's an excellent question, and Michael's done an excellent job at crafting a document to do that. COMMISSIONER COYLE: I understand that you can draft a settlement for those lawsuits that are outstanding and to protect anyone who is previously involved in those. Is there any possibility of protecting us against future claims from this guy that are frequented? MR. BRYANT: Well, that's a good corollary, Commissioner Coyle, and Michael has addressed that, because it says if you ever thought about suing us for something, you are releasing us for that, and you will not sue us for that. If you even thought you might have some idea to sue us, you're releasing us from that. MR. PETTIT: Let me say, though, up to and through the date that the parties sign the agreement, so when Commissioner Coletta signs the agreement, assuming that's how we go, three days later he February 21,2? 02 can say, "Tom 011iff defamed me" or "Mike Pettit defrauded me when he entered that settlement." I'm not sure how we could handle that. I've never seen it done, but I suppose it's possible to craft a settlement saying we have to have a covenant to never sue us again for anything. MR. BRYANT: And I think that you're -- we could do that. MR. PETTIT: That settlement or draft right now doesn't go quite that far. COMMISSIONER COYLE: If he understands he can get, what, $117,000 right now from us, he can start suing us again for all sorts of things. MR. BRYANT: No, sir. It's not 117,000. It's eighty -five total. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Okay. He can start suing us again about a whole list of things. I mean, there are people right now who maintain that there's corruption in county government. Can he come and start seeking out things that he can charge us. with doing and sue us? MR. BRYANT: Commissioner Coyle, the way I'd answer that is this: Anybody that's got $87.50 can sue you. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Yeah. MR. BRYANT: And you can't prevent them unless you stick a gun in their mouth, and we haven't been able to do that with Mr. Waj erski yet. And I'm not suggesting we ever consider that, except at times I did get that frustrated. There's no way -- and Michael's correct; there's no way you can absolutely positively say he will never sue you again. I do believe, though, we have reached the point in the litigation that he has lost enough and his health has deteriorated enough -- because he has cancer -- that he -- and I think Michael will agree with this with his discussion with him -- he really wants to come to closure. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Okay. Now, that -- that is really February I,ZA interesting because I didn't see these facts in there. The man is on his last legs. MR. BRYANT: Not his last leg, Commissioner Coletta. He has been in cancer remission for the last couple of years, but he has been treated for cancer in Chicago two years ago, because we had to continue the trial because he was there. I don't know how long he's going to live. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: I know and the point is that it really bothers me. Here's a man who has represented himself who is so effective that he's tied us completely up, got us over the barrel and holding us for ransom for $85,000, and there still seems to be some uncertainty whether he can come back for second helpings later. You know, I -- I don't know if we're starting a precedent by paying this man even when he's wrong, and then the next person that comes along says, "Well, Mr. Wajerski pulled it off. Here is what you have to do to make it work. Here's the whole plan, and this is where the county's going to cave in." I know where you're coming from dollar for dollar. If we put this behind us, it's behind us, but I don't -- I don't really know if it's behind us, and I don't know who comes after this gentleman. MR. BRYANT: And that's a great point, Commissioner Coletta, and that's the problem you have in litigation. It's because that when somebody sues you even though it's wrongful you have to expend resources to defend that. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Right, and I understand that. MR. BRYANT: And the county has expended a significant amount of resources and been very successful. And you're right; it's like chumming the water when you settle these cases, but sometimes you've got to weigh the risk of all this future litigation that he's going to be thinking about 24 hours a day in his house with his computer, and somebody is going to have to be paid to respond to it. 12 February 26, 2002 CHAIRMAN COLETTA: And I hear you loud and clear. I -- I - - if the man really believes that he has a mission in life and that his mission deserves his full attention, I can't see how he's selling out -- selling out for $85,000. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Yeah, I agree. That's just -- that's just what I was going to say is -- excuse me -- why would we be paying him for his bad behavior when, as you said yourself, it doesn't look like there's any end in sight. MR. PETTIT: Let me -- let me just respond to that Commissioner. Two points: One is keep in mind that assuming you would wrap the sheriff into this. I've got to say Mr. Wajerski doesn't know anything about that part of the proposal, because I learned about that for the first time this morning as a possibility. The cost to the county would be around $15,000, not eighty -five because CHAIRMAN COLETTA: It's still money. MR. PETTIT: Yeah. COMMISSIONER FIALA: And then tomorrow he could -- MR. PETTIT: But then the other thing I would say is that -- and one of the reasons for this meeting -- as drafted right now, David's comments aside, I think I drafted a settlement proposal in the direction of the claims adjuster and some input from David that cuts Mr. Wajerski off from any claims that relate in any way to Collier County, his employment or termination of employment with Collier County or any other litigation he's ever had with Collier County, et cetera. Can he sue us in the future for something else? Yes. Would it be possible to go back and revisit that -- that document and attempt to make it something in the nature of a covenant never to sue us again for anything, possible. He might consider that. I just throw that out. That's out there. MR. OLLIFF: What it does is it covers at least the full period of time when Wajerski had any personal relationship with this Page 11 12A February 26, 2002 organization. MR. PETTIT: Exactly. At this time up to now. MR. OLLIFF: Right. And so the only way he would be able to sue us from that point forward is he's got to be able to show that somehow as just a regular Joe citizen he's been aggrieved by the county somehow personally, and then I think you've really done a nice job of limiting his ability. MR. BRYANT: And that's the key point what Tom points out. That's the really key point because we have the starting point when he went to work here and we've got today when he signs the agreement. And he is giving up all claims against anyone during that time period. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Can you broaden that a bit by not only excluding all of the people that were involved with him during that period of time, but also exclude all events or activities which occurred during that time? In other words, he cannot a year from now sue us for some other event that occurred during that period. So we're talking about protecting all of the persons involved during that specific time period but also any events that occurred during that time. MR. BRYANT: That's an excellent point, Commissioner Coyle, and I think that the way the document is drafted now I think it totally does that. Because it doesn't just talk about people. It talks about anything that basically -- of any association with Wajerski and anybody associated with Collier County -- Collier County or any activities performed by Collier County. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Okay. MR. PETTIT: Quite frankly, depending on what the board would decide if it takes action on this at some point, Mr. Wajerski has not approved the settlement documents. He's just looked at it. And I don't have any reason not to go back and tighten it up even Page 12 12A February 26, 2002 more at this point. And I will say that if we are going to -- one of the things we have to keep in mind, if we are going to try to wrap the sheriff and the sheriffs deputy who he's also sued here into this package in exchange for them contributing some money to the settlement, he may balk at that, because that certainly is not what we negotiated with our excess carrier, but I'm certainly going to have to disclose it. I will just put the names in there. MR. OLLIFF: Why would they have not been included? MR. PETTIT: I do not understand how that occurred. MR. BRYANT: I can address that. The sheriffs self - insurance fund took the position early on, just as we did, they did nothing wrong. They weren't going to pay him anything, and we'll just litigate it forever. Well, after they saw how extensive the litigation is getting in Tallahassee, they talked to their counsel in Fort Lauderdale and said, "You know, bravado is good, but sometimes it's too expensive, so if you can get us out of this, get us out of it." And the person who sued for the sheriffs office, Mark Churney, he's the sheriffs chief pilot. One of our witnesses at the trial, he's a lieutenant, up for captain now, outstanding person. I mean, those are the kind of people that have been involved in this, and those are the kind of people that if you settle this you're going to be getting them out of it, which I think is something to definitely be considered. Especially when you think about the time and attention all the myriad of people who are going to have to apply to this. Not only your attorneys, but I'm talking about your employees, your former employees, Jennifer, Jim Mitchell in the clerk's office, all those people that helped us in this trial are now being penalized because they were our witnesses. COMMISSIONER FIALA: Well, what is he suing everybody for? What did he start the suit for? MR. BRYANT: He started the suit initially -- had five suits. I Page 13 February 26, 2002 got three. I got two dismissed. Those were against individuals. The third suit was against Peter Bolton who I saw on the agenda got an award today. Peter is one of our outstanding people too. Peter was our chief pilot. He was Waj erski's superior. He sued Peter and he sued Walter Copka who's a commander at EMS who was a flight medic. He sued them initially individually under slander and liable saying that they said bad things and wrote bad things about him. I got that case -- we won that on judgment on the pleadings. But he can still appeal that or try to or try to file a motion for -- or file an amended complaint because Judge Hayes let him because he's pro se. That means he represents himself and pro se people get more leave than lawyers do. The third or the fourth lawsuit was the whistle - blower suit where he said that we terminated him because he exposed graft and corruption in the county. Well, we said, "Go have a psychological examination. Go get a flight physical." In fact, it was signed off by the county manager. "You do that, we'll bring you back to work. We suspend you for 30 days." He said, "No, I'm not going to do that. I'm going to leave and sue you." Which he did. We went to trial for two weeks. We won that case. That's the case that I'm sure he will appeal because I feel comfortable that he will lose the motion for a new trial. The fifth lawsuit was a federal lawsuit that he has filed himself in federal court in Fort Myers suing all of these people. In the lawsuit and the whistle blower he only sued the county and Diane Flagg, Peter Bolton, Walter Cochran, Norris Himes. Norris used to be our head of EMS services here. I got the individuals out so that the county was the only defendant in that case, but in the federal litigation he's claiming that we all conspired to deny him his civil rights. We lied, cheated, subverted the Court, did everything you can think of to win the lawsuit. Whereupon at the end of the lawsuit the judge wrote a ten -page order saying that we won on every point. The Page 14 12A February 26, 2002 only person he didn't sue in the lawsuit was the court reporter and the judge. COMMISSIONER FIALA: So then by -- by this explanation, obviously, he's got -- he's got some problems that he's dealing with emotionally, and -- and it sounds like he's devoting his life to -- to lawsuits which don't cost him very much of any dollars at all, but costs us a lot. Thirdly, it seems like whatever he can get from these different lawsuits would be his earnings for that year, I mean, depending on how much he gets back. I'm inclined to -- you know, I can understand where you're coming from but how much more -- can you really tie him up from not continuing this on as a life's vocation? MR. PETTIT: I think -- I think with some additional slight tinkering with what's already in place I could -- I think we would have a document that would shut him off from further lawsuits against the county or individuals that have been associated with the county up to the time we sign the documents. Could we -- can we -- what can we do for the future, that's MR. BRYANT: One point you make, Commissioner Fiala, that's excellent, is that it is a crusade and it is a mission. And plus, let's say we won every lawsuit. Let's say we spend a million dollars and we win every lawsuit. We taught him a lesson, but who won the lesson? And the reason I say that is because he has nothing to lose. He has no job. He has no money. He has no assets. So he -- he is one of those kind of people that -- like the prisoner cases that you can't do anything to them, and that's why as distasteful as it is a business decision is why. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Commissioner Henning. COMMISSIONER HENNING: We're getting recommendations from our counsel and our outside counsel to settle this for the betterment of -- for the taxpayer. I don't like it just as much as you or Page 15 12A February 26, 2002 Commissioner Coyle, but we're the stewards here of the taxpayers' money; therefore, if it's proper now to make a motion, I'll -- MR. WEIGEL: It's not. We just want to discuss the negotiation here. We're looking for some general advice. We understand the tenor of your discussion. When we go back then to the -- and open the session, Mr. Coletta will indicate that the closed session is finished. When we go back out there and open up the session for the 12 -B item, then you can have discussion and give direction. Obviously, the purpose of this closed session is so that detail doesn't necessarily have to be restated publicly at this point in time since it's the fruit of negotiation discussion that we're having here. But at that open session we will answer any question that's given to us there, and any discussion or statements you make on the record in regard to prudence looking after taxpayers' funds and things of that nature is part of the record at that point and public even at that early point right there. And, again, you've heard from David Bryant. You've heard from Mike Pettit, but you also heard a bit from Tom in regard to the fact that it has affected -- it is effective -- affecting the county staff and has in the past primarily. So I don't want to overstate that, Tom, but I thought Tom was on the record here, too, indicating that there have been certainly effects that have been felt that have called it a practical or impractical effect on his staff, not just the attorney staff that handles the litigation. MR. OLLIFF: However -- however distasteful this one is, having been involved peripherally for seven straight years in this case, if there is a potential for getting out of it for $15,500, that's a good -- that's a good thing. COMMISSIONER COYLE: I would agree with that. MR. OLLIFF: My hope is, though, that somehow that we are not barred from, if asked, the commissioners can at least publicly indicate that the county's total exposure in the settlement case after Page 16 1, February 96 somebody was working the court system against us for seven straight years was now -- whatever that number ends up. MR. PETTIT: Depending on how everything goes those numbers are out there -- will be out, public numbers. I think, again, to understand one of the factors in this negotiation with Mr. Waj erski will be, if we're going to include -- and we're going to include the sheriff in the negotiation -- we've been asked to do that, and there is a slight benefit to us because there will be some contribution -- he may say, "You know, I settled for $85,000 against Collier County and those people associated with the county. I didn't settle with the sheriff, so that's not part of the deal." But that's certainly something to keep in mind. It's a factor, but I think it's important for us to bring it up. COMMISSIONER FIALA: What makes you think he's going to accept these dollars? MR. PETTIT: Well, Commissioner, at this point in time, he -- he agreed that if -- he agreed with our claims adjuster when we negotiated with him that if the board approved a settlement in the amount of $85,000 he would accept it. I see still two potential stumbling blocks. One's the one I mentioned, the sheriffs deputy issue, which we'll see how he responds to that if there were to be a settlement. And, two, to the extent that we tighten up even more the agreement. And I can think of maybe one more thing I could say in there to tighten it up. I don't know whether that would be a stumbling block. I think that's of less concern with how he'll respond when we add in the idea of the sheriff. So I still think that's a good idea for the county. COMMISSIONER HENNING: I say just bring the check to the table. MR. PETTIT: I think there was one other factor that you could keep in mind. I was told by the claims adjuster -- and I don't know if Page 17 7 ' ,; February 26, 2002 this was in the mediation. Was there a mediation in the case? There were some series of settlement discussions that occurred some months back within the last six months where his absolute bottom line was $250,000. MR. BRYANT: That was after our court- imposed arbitration that was continued because my motion for summary judgment was pending. MR. PETTIT: Okay. So in the meantime there's been a substantial drop. MR. BRYANT: And I might add one point: When we were getting ready to go to trial on the whistle - blower case in 1999, his bottom -line figure with a lawyer at that time was $450,000 to settle. And the board said not "No," but "Hell, no." Which was the right decision. So it's -- the numbers have moved considerably. That's why I was surprised that this number is on the table today. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: There's never been a case like this before? MR. BRYANT: That's gone on this long? CHAIRMAN COLETTA: That has the same parameters, where we end up selling out. MR. BRYANT: I know of one in the City of Pompano Beach because I represented them, but I'm not involved on -- that's gone on for over ten years. It's gone to the Supreme Court twice. They have spent just a tremendous amount of money. The numbers are millions of dollars over an inverse condemnation matter, but Collier has never had one like that. MR. WEIGEL: Mr. Chairman, we've had a couple cases a few years ago where we -- the question came from the board, the appropriate question was: What are the risks of winning and losing? And Ken Cuyler was asked these many times, and he chaffed under them, and I continue to also because when we estimate and tell you 12A February 26, 2002 anything -- the figure of 50150, 60/40, 70/30 and knowing what juries can do if it ever gets to the jury, we know that there's always risk with further court proceedings. And so from that standpoint the board or predecessor board members have, in fact, made the business decision to settle personal injury claims, other kinds of court cases claiming damages when it's 10,000 or $30,000 or things of that nature. And those boards at that time have considered what was the cost that got us where we were and what did the potential future in the courtroom appear to potentially be? And the crystal ball gazing is pretty -- pretty difficult. The object has always been not to appear or in actuality be providing rewards for unfortunate tenaciousness that's ill founded, but the board has made these decisions in the past on some of these personal injury claims. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: We've seen some come before us before with the fire department not too long ago. I still have a very uncomfortable feeling given this man -- I know the money isn't all coming from us, coming from our insurance pool, but I also realize that we pay for the insurance and that we use it. We have to pay more in the long run. So it's real money and $85,000 if the gentleman will cease and desist outright. It scares the daylights out of me. I'm just afraid of setting a precedent. Here's a man that doesn't have a background in law; correct? MR. OLLIFF: Does not. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: I would say he's pretty good at what he's doing. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Well, one other way to look at this is that we are -- we're paying -- it will be 12,000 or so -- or 15,000, so if the sheriff s office joins in this. We are paying $15,000 for a chance to get this thing off our back. If we're right it's a good investment. If we're wrong and he won't accept it or he brings up Page 19 12A February 26, 2002 more lawsuits, we are in no worse condition than we are now because he would continue this process. So we're really paying $15,000 for a good -- CHAIRMAN COLETTA: No, we're paying $85,000. COMMISSIONER COYLE: No, not us. Not us, the county isn't. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Regardless, whether it's insurance money or other money, whoever, it's still money. COMMISSIONER COYLE: But the money that comes from us, the taxpayers, is really $15,000. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: No, not correct, Fred. You've got the taxpayers are paying for the insurance premium, and the insurance premiums is what is actually covering the cost of this. They don't give the money away free for this. MR. PETTIT: Let me make a couple of points on that. And, unfortunately, because of the way the Sunshine Law operates, we can't have Mr. Walker here, so I hope I'm correct, but this was -- I was told this by the claims adjuster who has been involved with the excess carrier. The excess carrier questioned as to whether this claim is no longer an excess carrier. Why, I don't know the answer to that, but that particular excess carrier is unhappy. Frankly, one of the factors here they pulled the plug at sixty -seven five. They want to get this over with because it's costing them money. What's now being spent on that lawsuit to pay Mr. Bryant. Mr. Bryant wants to take a deposition, got to pay a court reporter, the excess carrier is paying for that. We don't. There was some unhappiness expressed by this former excess carrier about claims experience because that excess carrier is also involved with Dolphin Cove, and the board may in the heat of the many things we have to do forgotten, but I haven't. It's still there and, quite frankly, I'm still negotiating with that excess carrier about getting some February 26, 2002 contribution for Dolphin Cove. They don't like that fact, but that's still going on, and they are unhappy with their claims experience, and I think that's -- there are two things driving it. One is they know they're in their money, but two is they took a hard stand about we're not going to contribute more. We had claims experience with the county and where we feel like they have to contribute something. That's -- that's why -- that's why the numbers are as they are. So you're correct that in the future there might be a higher premium with a different excess carrier or the same excess carrier. My suspicion is the premiums probably go up to some degree based on experience, but they also probably go up based on just time passing and premiums go up. And that's why we got to 67,500. That's why they've taken such a hard stand because I tried to go, back and I understood what the settlement is, "Why are we paying anything? It's not your money." COMMISSIONER COYLE: It's not a direct relationship between the payment of the $67,000 and the taxpayers. MR. PETTIT: That's true. COMMISSIONER COYLE: So if you really want to look at what it's costing the taxpayers, you have to look at the premium for our excess insurance carrier which we're going to pay anyway and will continue to pay that and the $15,000 that would be out of pocket. So I think it's safe to say that from the taxpayer impact, the most logical way to look at it, is a standpoint of $15,000; is that right? MR. BRYANT: That's an excellent way of putting it, Commissioner Coyle. And also one thing you need to remember is that excess coverage is your cheapest coverage because you're not paying for dollar one coverage. That's why we have that 100,000 basically deductible. That's why we increased if from fifty to one hundred several years ago because you're paying it with cheaper dollars for that excess coverage. But if he files -- if we don't settle Page 21 Iti February 26, 002 and he files a lawsuit that's not covered, then you're going to be paying dollar one up to $100,000 to defend that on top of everything else and all the other lawsuits. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: And then once we get past the $100,000 they pick it up again. MR. BRYANT: Exactly. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Yeah. Not that I want to go that direction, but I know you're talking -- you're talking some business logic, but I mean I equate this to the same thing as protection money. In other words, we're paying him not to destroy the store, and we're giving him the money. I see this as a violation of everything we stand for, what this man is doing to us. I wish we could stop him. I wish there was a lawsuit we could counter with, but we can't. I know it's been explained to me. MR. PETTIT: Let me say this, David -- David and I have probably been the lead counsels in 95 percent of the litigation the county's been in since 1994, '95. This is the only one like this I know of. We have not had -- I know there have been some where the board has kind of said, "Gee, I don't know that I want to pay this person $10,000, but it's the economically wise thing to do." But we have not had this kind of a situation that -- David's analogy is absolutely right because I have been involved when I was in federal court as a clerk with a judge reviewing prisoner suits for the judge, and this is very similar. COMMISSIONER HENNING: You know, we are beating this up way too much. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Well, I think we've reached a point where we've probably reached our opinions. COMMISSIONER HENNING: So if I could finish. You know, I'm ready to go back in there and err on the side of the taxpayers for the benefit of the -- Page 22 12A February 26, 2002 CHAIRMAN COLETTA: And I'm ready to do the same thing. I guess the definition of taxpayers is different. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Looks like it's going to be deadlocked. CHAIRMAN COLETTA: Not necessarily. I don't know how Donna comes in on this. MR. OLLIFF: Keep in mind the amount of money the county will be out of pocket here we will spend in probably two full weeks worth of attorneys cost alone, let alone court reporters, expert witnesses, or anything else on top of that, but let alone your staff time. So I think the potential and, in my mind, of us not spending two more weeks worth of attorneys' time on ongoing cases is so remote I can't begin to tell you from a cash dollar business standpoint this is probably a pretty fair settlement agreement, but the principle issue is one you have to decide. COMMISSIONER COYLE: The only thing I would change about it is I would hit the sheriff up for a little more money because he's got big exposure over there if we settle and he doesn't. MR. OLLIFF: It's your pot too. COMMISSIONER COYLE: Just moving it from one pocket to the other. (Special closed session concluded at 2:40 p.m. Whereupon the regular session continued in the regular meeting room immediately following.) TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF DONOVAN COURT REPORTING, INC., BY CAROLYN J. FORD, NOTARY PUBLIC Page 23 12B MEMORANDUM Date: March 5, 2002 To: Nancy Bradley, Legal Assistant Office of the County Attorney From: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Settlement Involving Thomas Wajerski Enclosed please find five original documents as referenced above, Agenda Item #12B, as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2002. After obtaining Mr. Wajerski's signature, kindly return one original to Minutes & Records. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 7240. Thank you. Enclosures (5) 12B SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ( "Agreement and Release ") is entered into and made on this 26th day of February, 2002 by Collier County on behalf of itself and its past and current elected officials, past and current employees, past and current attorneys, past and current agents, past and current representatives, past and current independent contractors, past and current successors, past and current assigns, past and current sureties and past and current insurers as well as Don Hunter, individually and as Sheriff of Collier County, Florida, and any and all of his predecessors or successors in office, and any and all of his deputies, agents or employees, individually and in their capacity as Collier County Sheriff's deputies, including, but not limited to Mark Cherney, The Hunt Insurance Group, Inc., a Hilb, Rogal & Hamilton Company, and the Florida Sheriff's Self Insurance Fund and/or it successors or assigns, Peter Bolton, Norris Ijams, Diane Flagg, Walter Kopka, Paul Curtis, Thomas Whitecotton, David E. Bryant, Roff Sasser III, James Mitchell, Jeffery Walker, Jennifer Edwards and Ed Day (hereinafter referred to collectively as the "Settling Parties ") on the one hand, and Thomas Wajerski ( "Mr. Wajerski") on the other hand, with respect to Case No. 95- 2955 -CA and Case No. 95- 3067 -CA filed in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Collier County, Florida as well as Case No. 99 -303 filed in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida and also with respect to all other claims or controversies, whether known or unknown, that (a) could have been asserted in any of those three (3) cases or that (b) in any way relate or refer to, whether directly or indirectly and whether known or unknown, to Mr. Wajerski's employment with Collier County or his termination from employment with Collier County or that (c) involve or refer or relate in any way to any litigation or claim he has ever filed or 1 12 B ", threatened to file that involves, relates or refers in any way to any of the Settling Parties or that (d) relate or refer to or arise directly or indirectly from any other event, statement, act, circumstance or omission of any kind whatsoever that has occurred up to and through the effective date of this Agreement and Release. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Mr. Wajerski hereby acknowledges, understands and agrees that the term "the Settling Parties" as used in this Agreement and Release includes Collier County, Don Hunter, both individually and in his official capacity as Sheriff of Collier County, any and all of Don Hunter's predecessors or successors in office, Mark Chemey, Peter Bolton, Norris Ijams, Diane Flagg, Walter Kopka, Paul Curtis, Thomas Whitecotton, David E. Bryant, Roff Sasser III, James Mitchell, Jeffery Walker, Jennifer Edwards, Ed Day, The Hunt Insurance Group, the Florida Sheriff's Self- Insurance Fund and/or its successors or assigns as well as all of Collier County's past and current elected officials, past and current employees, past and current attorneys, past and current agents, past and current representatives, past and current independent contractors, past and current successors, past and current assigns, past and current sureties and past and current insurers'; WHEREAS, Mr. Wajerski has filed actions in the Twentieth Judicial Court in and for Collier County, Florida, i.e., Case Nos. 95- 2955 -CA and 95- 3067 -CA and also filed an action in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, i.e., Case No. 99 -303 (hereinafter referred to as the "Three Lawsuits "); 1 All individuals who are among the Settling Parties are expressly intended to be and by the agreement of Mr. Wajerski, are covered, protected and bound by this Agreement and Release in both their official and individual capacities. 2 12B WHEREAS, Mr. Wajerski has alleged various claims in the Three Lawsuits and answers and affirmative defenses or other appropriate responses to Mr. Wajerski's claims have been filed; WHEREAS, Mr. Wajerski and the Settling Parties, without admitting any liability or fault by either or any of them, recognize the cost and uncertainties of continued litigation and now desire to fully and finally resolve any and all claims, whether known or unknown, that (a) could have been asserted in any of the Three Lawsuits, and also desire to fully and finally resolve any and all claims or controversies, whether known or unknown, that (b) in any way relate or refer to, whether directly or indirectly and whether known or unknown, to Mr. Wajerski's employment with Collier County or his termination from employment with Collier County or that (c) involve or refer or relate in any way to any litigation or claim he has ever filed or threatened to file that involves, relates or refers in any way to any of the Settling Parties or that (d) relate or refer to or arise directly or indirectly from any other event, statement, act, circumstance or omission of any kind whatsoever that has occurred up to and through the effective date of this Agreement and Release; WHEREAS, Mr. Wajerski and the Settling Parties desire to reduce their compromise of the Three Lawsuits and all claims or controversies, whether known or unknown, that (a) could have been asserted in the Three Lawsuits or that (b) in any way relate or refer to, whether directly or indirectly and whether known or unknown, to Mr. Wajerski's employment with Collier County or his termination from employment with Collier County or that (c) involve or refer or relate in any way to any litigation or claim he has ever filed or threatened to file that involves, relates or refers in any way to any of the Settling Parties or that (d) relate or refer to or arise directly or indirectly from any other event, statement, act, circumstance or omission of any 3 28 kind whatsoever that has occurred up to and through the effective date of this Agreement and Release to a writing so that it may be binding upon Mr. Wajerski and the Settling Parties; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises and considerations set forth in this Agreement and Release, the sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, and with the intent to be legally bound, Mr. Wajerski and the Settling Parties mutually agree to the following: 1. Mr. Wajerski and the Settling Parties agree to adopt and incorporate the foregoing recitals, sometimes referred to as "Whereas clauses" by reference into this Agreement and Release as if they were fully stated terms of this Agreement and Release. 2. Mr. Wajerski acknowledges and agrees that Collier County has the authority to enter into this Agreement and Release on behalf of all Settling Parties. 3. The Settling Parties hereby agree to pay Mr. Wajerski the sum of Eighty Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($85,000.00) for alleged attorney's fees and costs as well as all other alleged damages incurred or claimed in the Three Lawsuits. In exchange for this payment, Mr. Wajerski agrees that he will dismiss the Three Lawsuits with prejudice and release the Settling Parties from any and all claims or controversies, whether known or unknown, that (a) could have been asserted in any of the Three Lawsuits or that (b) in any way relate or refer to, whether directly or indirectly and whether known or unknown, to Mr. Wajerski's employment with Collier County or his termination from employment with Collier County or that (c) involve or refer or relate in any way to any litigation or claim he has ever filed or threatened to file that involves, relates or refers in any way to any of the Settling Parties or that (d) relate or refer to or arise directly or indirectly from any other event, statement, act, circumstance or omission of any n 12B '; kind whatsoever that has occurred up to and through the effective date of this Agreement and Release. 4. Mr. Wajerski warrants and agrees that he shall have sole and ultimate responsibility for any and all taxes or tax liabilities that may occur or arise from the payment referred to in Paragraph No. 3 of this Agreement and Release. Accordingly, Mr. Wajerski agrees to indemnify, defend, and to hold harmless the Settling Parties from and against any tax liability, whether actual or alleged, including but not limited to income tax, in the event it is ever determined that the payment made by the Settling Parties under this Agreement and Release constitutes taxable income to Mr. Wajerski. 5. Mr. Wajerski further warrants and agrees that he has satisfied and cancelled all charging liens or claims of charging liens ever served, filed or asserted by any attorney that has ever represented him in any litigation involving or relating or referring in any way, whether directly or indirectly, to any of the Settling Parties. 6. Mr. Wajerski further warrants to the Settling Parties that he has not and will not in the future file any other charges, lawsuits, claims or any other action referencing or relating in any way whatsoever to his employment or termination from employment with Collier County or relating or referring in any way whatsoever to any litigation he has ever filed against the Settling Parties or relating or referring to any other claims or controversies, whether known or unknown, arising from or related directly or indirectly to any other event, statement, act, circumstance or omission of any kind that has occurred up to and through the effective date of this Agreement and Release. 5 12 E, 7. Except for any claim to enforce the terms and conditions of this Agreement and Release, Mr. Wajerski, on behalf of himself and any and all of his heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives and assigns, shall and hereby does fully, finally and unconditionally release, acquit and forever discharge the Settling Parties from any and all manner of action or actions, cause or causes of action, suits, debts, dues, sums of money, accounts, reckonings, covenants, charges, damages, obligations, liabilities, contracts, attorney's fees, costs, promises, judgments, executions, claims, complaints, legal or equitable demands, whether known or unknown, that (a) could have been asserted in any of the Three Lawsuits or that (b) in any way relate or refer to, whether directly or indirectly and whether known or unknown, to Mr. Wajerski's employment with Collier County or his termination from employment with Collier County or that (c) involve or refer or relate in any way to any litigation or claim he has ever filed or threatened to file that involves, relates or refers in any way to any of the Settling Parties or that (d) relate or refer to or arise directly or indirectly from any other event, statement, act, circumstance, or omission of any kind whatsoever that has occurred up to and through the effective date of this Agreement and Release. 8. Mr. Wajerski represents and warrants that he is fully authorized to enter into and that he has the authority to perform the terms of this Agreement and Release and that he has not sold, assigned, transferred, conveyed or otherwise disposed of all or any portion of the claims or controversies he has released and discharged in this Agreement and Release. 9. This Agreement and Release is the result of a compromise of disputed claims and it is understood that the execution and performance of this Agreement and Release does not constitute, nor shall it be construed as, an admission that any of the Settling Parties have violated 0 128 0-1 aft any law, statute, rule, regulation or ordinance of either the United States or the State of Florida or breached any duty owed to Mr. Wajerski under federal, state or local law, policy or practice, with respect to Mr. Wajerski's employment or termination from employment with Collier County, or in any other matter, or that any of Mr. Wajerski's claims have any merit whatsoever. In this regard, the Settling Parties expressly deny any and all wrongdoing alleged by Mr. Wajerski in the Three Lawsuits and otherwise. 10. This Agreement and Release shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. 11. This Agreement and Release is freely and voluntarily executed by Mr. Wajerski after he has been apprised of all relevant information concerning this Agreement and Release. In executing this Agreement and Release, Mr. Wajerski and the Settling Parties acknowledge that this Agreement and Release is the product of mutual negotiation and no doubtful or ambiguous provision in this Agreement and Release is to be construed against any party based upon a contention that the party drafted the ambiguous language or that the party was intended to benefit from the language or clause in question. 12. This Agreement and Release may be amended only by a written instrument specifically referring to this Agreement and Release and executed with the same formalities as this Agreement and Release. 13. Should any provision of this Agreement and Release be declared or be determined by any Court to be illegal or invalid, the validity of the remaining parts, terms, or provisions shall not be affected thereby and such an illegal or invalid part, term or provision shall be deemed not to be part of this Agreement and Release. 7 12B 14: In the event of an alleged breach of this Agreement and Release, Mr. Wajerski and the Settling Parties hereby agree that all underlying causes of action or claims of Mr. Wajerski have been extinguished by this Agreement and Release and that the sole remedy for breach of this Agreement and Release shall be for specific performance of its terms and conditions. In this regard, Mr. Wajerski and the Settling Parties further agree that the sole venue for any such action for specific performance shall be the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida or the Twentieth Judicial Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida in Naples, Florida. 15. Mr. Wajerski and the Settling Parties agree that this Agreement and Release supersedes and replaces all prior agreements and understandings and that it constitutes the entire agreement between Mr. Wajerski and the Settling Parties and that there exist no other agreements, whether oral or written, between them relating to any matters covered by this Agreement and Release or any other matter whatsoever. 16. This Agreement and Release may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 17. Except as expressly provided for herein, Mr. Wajerski and the Settling Parties represent and warrant that in executing this Agreement and Release, they do not rely upon and have not relied upon any oral or written representation, promise, warranty or understanding made by any of the parties or their representatives with regard to the subject matter, basis or effect of this Agreement and Release. 12B 18. Mr. Wajerski and the Settling Parties acknowledge and assume the risk that facts, additional and different or contrary to the facts which they believe to exist, may now exist or may be discovered after this Agreement and Release has been entered, and the parties agree that any such additional, different or contrary facts shall in no way limit, waive, affect or alter this Agreement and Release. 19. With the exception of any attorney's fees and costs specified in Paragraph No. 3 of this Agreement and Release, Mr. Wajerski and the Settling Parties agree that they each are hereby waiving and releasing any claim for attorney's fees and costs incurred in connection with the investigation, preparation, prosecution or defense of the Three Lawsuits or any other claims or controversies between them and each of them shall bear their own such attorney's fees and costs. The Settling Parties and Mr. Wajerski further agree and acknowledge that this reciprocal waiver of attorney's fees and costs also includes the attorney's fees and costs incurred by the Settling Parties in providing a defense to any current or former Collier County employees that were ever named as defendants in the Three Lawsuits. In this regard, Collier County represents and warrants that it has reimbursed or paid or will reimburse or pay all such fees and costs of any such current or former Collier County employees. 20. Notwithstanding anything in this Agreement and Release that may appear to be to the contrary, the effective date of this Agreement and Release for purposes of Paragraph 7 shall be the date it is executed by the Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Mr. Wajerski and the Settling Parties have executed this Agreement and Release, which consists of ten (10) pages, on the dates set forth below next to their respective signatures and as sworn to and acknowledged by Mr. Wajerski. 9 DATED: Dwight E. B-redk ,C BY: DEP Y �Q K Attest, ") to - Chairman - s stq"twy 041j. 12B Date of Si ture: By: Thomas jerski Date of Signature: /W" THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE BETWEEN THOMAS WAJERSKI AND THE SETTLING PARTIES, WAS SWORN TO and subscribed by Thomas Wajerski before me this Z-40 Signature of Notary Public LA24*0-j 7, docc/ Commissioned Name of Notary Public (Please print, type or stamp) day of , 2002. My Commission expires: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: 404 -4--f-JI-1 6�4 Michael W. Pettit Assistant County Attorney Personally Known or Produced Identification CX jq- wafffla- ?30- Oct- 244_D 01- Type of Identification Produced MARIAN R. COLD NOTARY PUBLIC - STATE OF FLORK 1A COMMISSION 0 DD013829 EXPIRES 818!2003 90NDED THRU 1- 688- NOTARYI h: /Public /Litigation/Open Cases/Wajerski/3rd amended settlement agreement and release.030402 10 °t (g 15A COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Board of County Commissioners r" 3341 East Taniiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 February 28, 2002 The Honorable Burt Saunders Florida State Senate Tallahassee, FL Dear Senator Saunders: It was brought to the County Commission's attention that the State Legislature may be considering some actions that would use SHIP funds for the Everglades restoration project. Affordable and workforce housing, as you know, is one of the most significant community problems facing Collier County, and the SHIP program is one of the few programs that Collier has to be able to provide real housing assistance. While the Commission supports the Everglades Restoration project, it does not support moving funds from an already under funded SHIP program to support it. At the Board meeting of Febnxuy..26- ; the Board of County Commissioners authorized me to provide this letter to you representing the position of the full Board. We hope that we can look forward to your supporting our position on this particular issue. Si Coletta, Chairman ier County Commission cc: Regional Planning Council Lee County Commission Charlotte County Commission Collier County Commission Tom 011iff, County Manager .-7�� CAS) 16A 2 COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS THIS CONSTRUCTION AND M4INTENANCE AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS entered into this,. ay of 20V� etween IslandWalk Development Company hereinafter referred to as "Developer ", and the oard of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereinafter referred to as the 'Board ". RECITALS: A. Developer has, simultaneously, with the delivery of this Agreement, applied for the approval by the Board of a certain plat of a subdivision to be known as IslandWalk Phase Seven. B. Division 3.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires the Developer to post appropriate guarantees for the construction of the improvements required by said subdivision regulations, said guarantees to be incorporated in a bonded agreement for the construction of the improvements required improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the mutual covenants hereinafter set forth, the Developer and the Board do hereby covenant and agree as follows: Developer will cause to be constructed: a potable water system, sanitary sewer system, drainage, grading, paving and miscellaneous as outlined in Engineer's Cost Estimate (attached hereto ads Exhibit "B" and by reference made a part hereof) within 12 months from the date of approval said subdivision plat, said improvements hereinafter referred to as the required improvements. 2. Developer herewith tenders its subdivision performance security (attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof) in the amount of $3,584,381.61 which represents 10% of the total contract cost to complete construction plus 100% of the probable cost to complete the required improvements at the date of this Agreement. 3. In the event of default by the Developer or failure of the Developer to complete such improvements within the time required by the Land Development Code, Collier County, may call upon the subdivision performance security to insure satisfactory completion of the required improvements. 4. The required improvements shall not be considered complete until a statement of substantial completion by Developer's engineer along with the final project records 10/5/01- 99857 Ver: 011- SMORRISO Cn N0772 -027.000- EWRK- 26078 16A 2 have been furnished to be reviewed and approved by the Development Services Director for compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code. 5. The Development Services Director shall, within sixty (60) days of receipt of the statement of substantial completion, with: a) notify the Developer in writing of his preliminary approval of the improvements; of b) notify the Developer in writing of his refusal to approve improvements, therewith specifying those conditions which the Developer must fulfill in order to obtain the Director's approval of the improvements. However, in no event shall the Development Services Director refuse preliminary approval of the improvements if they are in fact constructed and submitted for approval in accordance with the requirements of this Agreement. 6. The Developer shall maintain all required improvements for a minimum period of one year after preliminary approval by the Development Services Director. After the one year maintenance period by the Developer has terminated, the Developer shall petition the Development Services Director to inspect the required improvements. The Development Services Director or his designee shall inspect the improvements and, if found to be still in compliance with the Collier County Land Development Code as reflected by final approval by the Board, the Board shall release the remaining 10% of the subdivision performance security. The Developer's responsibility for maintenance of the required improvements shall continue unless or until the Board accepts maintenance responsibility for and by the County. 7. Six months after the execution of this Agreement and once within every six months thereafter the Developer may request the Development Services Director to reduce the dollar amount of the subdivision performance security on the basis of work complete. Each request for a reduction in the dollar amount of the subdivision performance security shall be accompanied by a statement of substantial completion by the Developer's engineer together with the project records necessary for review by the Development Services Director. The Development Services Director may grant the request for a reduction in the amount of the subdivision performance security for the improvements completed as of the date of the request. 8. In the event the Developer shall fail or neglect to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement, upon certification of such failure, the County Administrator may call upon the subdivision performance security to secure satisfactory completion, repair and maintenance of the required improvements. The Board shall have the right to construct and maintain, or cause to be constructed or maintained, pursuant to public advertisement and receipt and acceptance of bids, the improvements required herein. The Developer, as principal under the subdivision performance security, shall be liable to pay and to indemnify the Board upon completion of such construction, the final total cost to the Board thereof, including, but not limited to, engineering, legal and contingent costs, together with any damages, either direct or consequential, which the Board may 10!5101 -99857 Ver 011- SMORRISO Cam N0772- 027 -000- EWRK- 26076 16A 2 sustain on account of the failure of the Developer to fulfill all of the provisions of this Agreement. 9. All of the terms, covenants and conditions herein contained are and shall be binding upon the Developer and the respective successors and assigns of the Developer. COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board the Developer have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representatives this _ day of , 2001. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED IN THE PRESENCE OF: Witness Printed or typed name Ghan Ai t, 11A 4uJ Printed or typed name Witness 10!5101. 99857 Ver: 011- SMORRISO caw N0772- 027 -000 - EWRK- 26076 ISLANDWALK DEVELOPMENT COMPANY By: By: Michael D. Rosen, Vice President ry ATT''I� . ;. Dj��T E ;BRbCI%-- ERK B}'; ei AN 101so roved as to forknpd Legal Sufficiency: 1A ym 16A 2 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PATRICK G. WHITE, Assistant County Attorney 10!5101- 99857 Ver. 011- SMORRISO cnM3 N0772 -027.000- EWRK- 26076 - ...■rl�►�..: Vii/ 16A 2 COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE BOND BOND NO SM2269 KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: that Island Walk Development Company, 4500 PGA Boulevard Suite 400 Palm Beach Gardens Florida 33418, (hereinafter referred to as "Owner ") and St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company 500 West Madison Street Suite 2600, Chicago Illinois 60661 (hereinafter referred to as "Surety") are held firmly bound unto Collier County, Florida, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 33942 (hereinafter referred to as "County") in the total aggregate sum of three million five hundred eighty four thousand three hundred eighty one and 61/100 ($3,584,381.61) lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, we bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally firmly by these presents. Owner and Surety are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION is such that whereas, the Owner has submitted for approval by the Board a certain subdivision plat name Island Walk Phase 7 and that certain subdivision shall include specific improvements which are required by Collier County Ordinances and Resolutions (hereinafter "Land Development Regulations "). This obligation of the Surety shall commence on the date this Bond is executed and shall continue until the date of final acceptance by the Board of County Commissioners of the specific improvements described in the Land Development regulations (hereinafter the "guaranty period "). NOW THEREFORE, if the Owner shall well, truly and faithfully perform its obligations and duties in accordance with the Land Development Regulations during the guaranty period established by the County, and the Owner shall satisfy all claims and demands incurred and shall fully indemnify and safe harmless the County from and against all costs and damages which it may suffer by reason of Owner's failure to do so, and shall reimburse and repay the County all outlay and expense which the county may incur in making good any default, then this obligation shall be void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. PROVIDED FURTHER, that the said Surety, for value received hereby stipulates and agrees that no change, extension of time, alteration, addition or deletion to the proposed specific improvements shall in any way affect its obligation on this Bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such change, extension of time, alteration, addition or deletion to the proposed specific improvements. PROVIDED, FURTHER, that it is expressly agreed that the Bond shall be deemed amended automatically and immediately, without formal and separate amendments hereto, so as to bind the Owner and the Surety to the full and faithful performance in accordance with the Land Development Regulations. The term "Amendment ", wherever used in this Bond, and whether referring to this Bond, or other documents shall include an alteration, addition or modification of any character whatsoever. Eq �A % 1 1/ 16A 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this PERFORMANCE BOND to be executed on this 291h day of October, 2001. AJ Countersigned by: A-; J�/,' ohn R. Neu Island Walk Development Company Calvin R. Boyd, Di . of Treasury Operations St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Dawn L. Morgan Attorney -in -Fact a/+ ACKNOWLEDGEMENT BY PRINCIPAL STATE OF MICHIGAN )ss. COUNTY OF OAKLAND) 16A 2 On this 29th day of October, 2001, before me, the undersigned authorized employee, personally appeared Calvin R. Boyd acknowledges himself to be Director of Treasury Operations of Island Walk Development Company, and that he as such employee being authorized to do so, executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained by signing the name of the Corporation by himself as such employee. My Commission Expires: March 26, 2002 Notary Public, Marcia G. Howard Oakland County, Michigan MR033 W:L QUUMODLWn ar ��4 16A 2 State of Illinois} } ss. County of Cook } On _October 29, 2001 , before me, a Notary Public in and for said County and State, residing therein, duly commissioned and sworn, personally appeared _Dawn L. Morgan known to me to be Attorney -in -Fact of — St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company the corporation described in and that executed the within and foregoing instrument, and known to me to be the person who executed the said instrument in behalf of the said corporation, and he duly acknowledged to me that such corporation executed the same. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal, the day and year stated in this certificate above. My Commission Expires 5/11/2002 Alice Rhoads, Notary Public [NOTARY FFICIAL SEAL" ALICE RHOADS PUB! TATE OF ILLINOIS MM�� .,, i> ZES 5/11/2002 �%a The ST Pa u I Power of Attorney No. POWER OF ATTORNEY Seaboard Surety Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company 22527 United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters, Inc. Certificate No. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That Seaboard Surety Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of New York. and that St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company are corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota, and that United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Man land. and that Fidelitv and Guaranty Insurance Company is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Iowa. and that Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters. Inc. is a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of Wisconsin (herein colle(tirel. culled the "Companies"). and that the Companies do hereby make, constitute and appoint James Scheer, Richard M. Scheer, Dawn L. Morgan, Alice Rhoads, Bonnie Kruse, Michael J. Scheer, Stephen T. Kazmer, James I. Moore, Peggy Faust, Kelly A. Jacobs and Elaine Marcus Countryside Illinois of the City of . State . their true and lawful Attomey(si -in -Fact. each in their separate capacity if more than one is named above. to sign its name as surety to, and to execute. seal and acknowledge any and all bonds. undertakings. contracts and other written instruments in the nature thereof on behalf of the Companies in their business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons. uaranteeing the performance of contracts and executing or guaranteeing bonds and undertakings required or permitted in any actions or proceedings allowed by law. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Companies have caused this instrument to be signed and sealed this 7th day of May 2001 Seaboard Surety Company United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Fidelih and Guaranh Insurance Company St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters. Inc. SL Paul Mercury Insurance Company , $nAflyf O\ ^^ i.ySG9 'PI �MSUq M1y:Y * PCO O�q�' 4 0.1YN1�'n l �4 `'m A L : jo"i�..,581iL,p qh 1896 gL 9%% $ I State of Maryland City of Baltimore TIKATAS F II1II3REGTSE.. -mart Secretary On this 7th day of May 2001 (More me. the undersigned officer. personally appeared John F. Phinney and Thomas E. Huibregtse, who acknowledged themselves to be the Vice President and Assistant Secretary. respectively. of Seaboard Surcty Compan. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company. St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company. Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Company. and Fidelity and Guaranty Insurance Underwriters. Inc.: and that the seals affixed ut the titregoing instrument are the corporate Seals of said Companies: and that they, as such_ being authorized so to do. executed the foregoing instrument for the purposes therein contained by signing the names of the corporations by themselves as duly authorized officers. PEA �0 In Witness Whereof. I hereunto set my hand and official seal. P�TARY M Ve(1C My Commission expires the 13th day of July. 2002. �O^ECnr 86203 Rev. 7 -2000 Printed in U.S.A. REBECCA EASLEY- ONOKALA. Notun Public IslandWalk Phase 7 Opinion of Probable Cost Summary Sanitary Collection System Potable Water Drainage Paving Lighting Landscaping (code minimum) Total Probable Cost Bond Amount (110% of Total Probable Cost) 10/4r"l- 100027 V.: 01H MSaIM CAM43 M772- 027 -000• ECOR- 26074 $539,386.96 $343,139.60 $414,623.20 $1,683,596.91 $ 27,782.07 $ 250.000.00 $ 3,258,528.74 $ 3,584,381.61 16A 2 Oct 04, 2001 12:34 Sanitary Collection System 0772 -027 -00 -E2 Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek 16A 2 Page: 2 Opinion of Probable Cost IslandWalk Phase 7 Total Sanitary Collection System: $539,38696 Estimated Item# Description Ouantity Unit Unit Price Amount 9000 Pump Station (complete) 3.00 EA $30,000.00 $90,000.00 8' Diameter 9001 TV sewer (preliminary) 14.00 LS $1,945.68 $27,239.52 9002 TV Sewer (final) 14.00 LS $2,12256 $29,715.84 419 8 "PVC Gravity Main 4,729.00 LF $16.00 $75,664.00 (0'-6' cut) 420 8" PVC gravity main 3,286.00 LF $19.50 $64,077.00 (6' -8' cut) 421 8" PVC gravity main 2,647.00 LF $27.50 $72,79250 (8' -10' cut) 442 Manhole 4' diameter 13.00 EA $1,300.00 $16,900.00 (0'-6' cut) 443 Manhole 4' diameter 10.00 EA $1,450.00 $14,500.00 (6' -8' cut) 444 Manhole 4' diameter 5.00 EA $1,900.00 $9,500.00 (8' -10' cut) 445 Manhole 4' diameter 3.00 EA $2,300.00 $6,900.00 (10' -12' cut) 410 Single sanitary sewer service 82.00 EA $320.00 $26,240.00 411 Double sanitary sewer service 133.00 EA $420.00 $55,860.00 975 4" PVC forcemain 2,202.00 LF $8.00 $17,616.00 (C -900, CL -200) 976 6" PVC forcemain 1,417.00 LF $13.00 $18,421.00 (C -900, CL -200) 977 8" PVC forcemain 807.00 LF $17.30 $13,961.10 (C -900, CL -200) Total Sanitary Collection System: $539,38696 Oct 04, 2001 12:34 Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek Page: 3 Opinion of Probable Cost LslandWalk Phase 7 Potable Water 16 A 0772 -027 -00 -E2 Estimated Item# Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 9006 Air release valve 12.00 EA $1,300.00 $15,60000 9007 1" PVC double service 144.00 EA $400.00 $57,60000 9008 Connect to existing water 2.00 LS $2,000.00 $4,000.00 with gap configuration 9009 Install temporary meter assembly 2.00 EA $2,000.00 $4,00000 per County Standards 537 6" PVC water main 8,198.00 LF $9.00 $73,78200 (C -900, Class 150) 539 10" PVC water main 4,297.00 LF $20.00 $85,940.00 (C -900, Class 150) 543 6" PVC water main 524.00 LF $14.90 $7,807.60 (C -900, Class 200) 545 10" PVC water main 280.00 LF $22.00 $6,160.00 (C -900, Class 200) 553 3/4" PVC water service complete 65.00 LS $270.00 $17,55000 469 Fire hydrant 26.00 EA $2,100.00 $54,60000 476 6" Gate valve with box 14.00 EA $600.00 $8,400.00 478 10" Gate valve with box 4.00 EA $650.00 $2,600.00 499 Permanent bacterial sample point 6.00 EA $850.00 $5,10000 Total Potable Water: $343,139.60 Oct 04, 2001 12:34 Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek Page: 4 Opinion of Probable Cost islandWalk Phase 7 16A *'� /` Drainage 0772 -027 -00 -E2 Estimated Item# Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Amount 9010 Type 2 Valley gutter inlet 72.00 EA $1,881.00 $135,43200 (top and bottom) 9011 15" Flared End 7.00 EA $574.80 $4,023.60 9012 18" Flared End 14.00 EA $583.90 $8,174.60 9017 24" Flared End 2.00 EA $647.50 $1,295.00 9020 Grate Inlet 16.00 EA $1,150.00 $18,400.00 FDOT (Type C) 271 15" RCP 3,929.00 LF $22.00 $86,43 &00 272 18" RCP 2,998.00 LF $25.00 $74,950.00 273 24" RCP 1,038.00 LF $36.00 $37,36 &00 9021 30" Flared End 3.00 EA $800.00 $2,400.00 9022 36" Flared End 2.00 EA $971.00 $1,942.00 274 30" RCP 963.00 LF $30.00 $28,89Q00 275 36" RCP 313.00 LF $40.00 $12,52Q00 9023 Modified (Type C) 1.00 EA $1,400.00 $1,400.00 Control Structure 2304 3x3 Junction box 1.00 EA $1,390.00 $1,390.00 Total Drainage: $414,623.20 Oct 04, 2001 12:34 Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek $2.00 Page: 5 9015 Opinion of Probable Cost $1.53 (Type -III) (2nd lift) Paving LslandWalk Phase 7 16A 2 0772 -027 -00 -E2 (compacted & primed) 595 8" Limerock base 62,765.00 Estimated 779 Sodding (Bahia) Item# Description Ouantity Unit Unit Price Amount 9014 3/4" Asphaltic concrete $2.00 (Tpye- IH)(lst lift) 9015 3/4" Asphaltic concrete $1.53 (Type -III) (2nd lift) 589 12" Stabilized subgrade 594 6" Limerock base 187,853.00 (compacted & primed) 595 8" Limerock base 62,765.00 (compacted & primed) 779 Sodding (Bahia) 626 Curb & gutter $4.60 (Type E) modified 627 Curb & gutter $1.00 (Type F) modified 632 24" Valley gutter 649 4" Concrete sidewalk 685 12" Solid stripe thermoplastic 687 24" Solid stripe thermoplastic 691 Reflective pavement marker 697 Stop sign 698 Speed limit sign 699 Street sign 107,157.00 SY $2.00 $214,314.00 107,157.00 SY $1.53 $163,95Q21 187,853.00 SY $2.10 $394,491.30 62,765.00 SY $4.20 $263,613.00 19,709.00 SY $4.60 $90,661.40 2,809.00 SY $1.00 $2,809.00 1,413.00 LF $6.00 $8,478.00 888.00 LF $6.50 $5,772.00 35,520.00 LF $4.50 $159,84Q00 23,112.00 SY $16.00 $369,79200 880.00 LF $1.70 $1,496.00 220.00 LF $3.50 $770.00 26.00 EA $5.00 $130.00 22.00 EA $120.00 $2,640.00 31.00 EA $120.00 $3,720.00 14.00 EA $80.00 $1,120.00 Total Paving: $1,683,59691 Oct 04, 2001 12:34 Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek Opinion of Probable CoFf Isl dWalk Ph 7 Page: 6 an ase � Lighting 0772 -027 -00 -E2 16A Estimated Item# Description Quantity Unit Unit -Price Amount 9016 25' Concrete pole and fixture 5,353.00 LF $5.19 $27,78207 Total Lighting: $27,78207 16A 3 RESOLUTION NO. 02- 9 9 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN GREY OAKS UNIT TEN, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPTING THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OR THE CITY OF NAPLES WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on May 13, 1997 approved the plat of Grey Oaks Unit Ten for recording; and WHEREAS, the developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91 -102, as amended); and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -17), and WHEREAS, the developer has now requested final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Compliance Services Section of the Development Services Department has inspected the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance be granted for those roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in Grey Oaks Unit Ten, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the homeowners association or the City of Naples. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DWIG, E <BROCK, CLERK 9 / " /�'��,` +�iWw../ i Imo• ,t Attest as to Chs1rl"•3 sigma"" 4e1'l. Approved as to form and legal su iency: f Patrick G. White Assistant Collier County Attorney MAO r • RUIN �. 16P. 4 RESOLUTION NO. 02- 10 0 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN GREY OAKS UNIT TWELVE, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPTING THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE , WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OR THE CITY OF NAPLES. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on November 24, 1998 approved the plat of Grey Oaks Unit Twelve for recording; and WHEREAS, the developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91 -102, as amended); and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -17), and WHEREAS, the developer has now requested final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Compliance Services Section of the Development Services Department has inspected the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance be granted for those roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in Grey Oaks Unit Twelve, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the homeowners association, or the City of Naples. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DATE: ,tG� A0*A, DWI IT t BROCK, CLERK kl t k. WAS to Chairnan's =1904two only. Approved as to form and legal ficiencQZaaMb : atrick G. hate Assistant Collier County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO Y, FLO)kIDA A& x/ By: JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN 16A 5 RESOLUTION NO. 02 -101 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF THOSE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE, WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS IN GREY OAKS UNIT THIRTEEN, RELEASE OF THE MAINTENANCE SECURITY, AND ACCEPTING THE MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE ROADWAY, DRAINAGE , WATER AND SEWER IMPROVEMENTS THAT ARE NOT REQUIRED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION OR THE CITY OF NAPLES. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, on December 1, 1998 approved the plat of Grey Oaks Unit Thirteen for recording; and WHEREAS, the developer has constructed and maintained the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in accordance with the approved plans and specifications and as required by the Land Development Code (Collier County Ordinance No. 91 -102, as amended); and the Utilities Standards and Procedures Ordinance (Collier County Ordinance No. 97 -17), and WHEREAS, the developer has now requested final acceptance of the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and release of his maintenance security; and WHEREAS, the Compliance Services Section of the Development Services Department has inspected the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements and is recommending acceptance of said facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that final acceptance be granted for those roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements in Grey Oaks Unit Thirteen, and authorize the Clerk to release the maintenance security. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the County accept the future maintenance and other attendant costs for the roadway, drainage, water and sewer improvements that are not required to be maintained by the homeowners association or the City of Naples. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. "ATTEST; f IwIGHT t. BROCK, CLERK Att�� w u, "'Ctiatr�n -3 Approved as to form and legal licien i k V\ 0fj� Patrick G. White Assistant Collier County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO Y, FLO A By: JAMES K. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN 16A 6 .10, DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 1, 2002 16h 7 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 1, 2002 16A RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 102 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99 -51, AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91 -47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99 -51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91 -47, as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together with a description of said parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable no later than twenty (20) days of the date of the Legal Notice of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the rate of twelve percent (12 %) per annum. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner(s) of said property, is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatement, to wit: NAME: BAKER, THOMAS L & MARIAN J LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4, Block 6, Gulf Shores, in accordance with and subject to the plat recorded in Plat book 4, Page 50, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. COST: $255.00 REFERENCE #: 1966 FOLIO #; 48173960000 The Clerk shall (by regular U.S. mail) mail a copy of this Resolution along with the Notice of Assessment of Lien to the owner(s) of the above- described property. If within twenty (20) days of the date of mailing that copy, the owner fails to deliver payment in full to Collier County, a certified copy of this Resolution and the Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, and by recording shall constitute a lien against the above - described real property, and to the extent allowed by law, shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal property owned by the noted property owner(s) in Collier County. This Resolution passed and duly adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this lcday of . -X_k,4 . , 2002. ATTEST• ' 'r BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Dvvli'I E.'RK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY. ,��ce�� BY: Deputy Clerk', Attest AS to ClftlruA's Jam . Coletta, Chairman sigw�trre ply. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attorney F: LIEN/ MSTR RESOLUTION 2951632 OR: 3002 PG: 2539 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/20/2002 at 02:34PR DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK RE" FEE 10.50 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 1240 • BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN BAKER, THOMAS L & MARIAN J 2759 LAKEVIEW DR NAPLES, FL 34112 REF. INV.# 1966 FOLIO #: 48173960000 16 P. DATE: FEB 2 6 2002 1 IST'- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4, Block 6, Gulf Shores, in accordance with and subject to the plat recorded in Plat book 4, Page 50, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. You, as the owner(s) of the property above - described, as recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Property Appraiser, are hereby advised that the Code Enforcement Director, did determine a public nuisance existed and constituted a violation of county regulations on August 27, 2001, and ordered the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on the above property prohibited by Ordinance No. 99 -51, as amended and served a notice of violation upon you. The nuisance is: WEEDS: ACCUMULATION OF WEEDS, GRASS, OR OTHER NON - PROTECTED OVERGROWTH IN EXCESS OF 18" You have failed to timely abate such nuisance; whereupon, it was abated by the expenditure of public funds at a direct cost of FIFTY -FIVE ($55.00) DOLLARS and an administrative cost of Two - hundred ($200.00) dollars for a total of TWO - HUNDRED FIFTY- FIVE ($255.00) DOLLARS. Such cost, by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, shall become a lien on your property when recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COUNTY. F: LIENS/ MSTR LNAL 16A 8 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 103 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99 -51, AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91 -47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99 -51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91 -47, as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together with a description of said parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable no later than twenty (20) days of the date of the Legal Notice of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner(s) of said property, is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatement, to wit: NAME: FAST, SCOTT & TAMMY LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 9, Block 221, Golden Gate Subdivision, Unit No. 6, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat book 5, pages 124 through 134, inclusive, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. COST: $255.00 REFERENCE #: 2047 FOLIO #: 36321840007 The Clerk shall (by regular U.S. mail) mail a copy of this Resolution along with the Notice of Assessment of Lien to the owner(s) of the above - described property. If within twenty (20) days of the date of mailing that copy, the owner fails to deliver payment in full to Collier County, a certified copy of this Resolution and the Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, and by recording shall constitute a lien against the above- described real property, and to the extent allowed by law, shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal property owned by the noted property owner(s) in Collier County. This Resolution passed and duly adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this&.ACay of .3C -- , 2002. ATTEST; :,., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS D�IGW E. ROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, LORID $'Y: BY: _3 Clerk, Attf�t �i �o Chi�1'YA'f James N. Coletta, Chairman Si�ftw� 901l. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: p4U44_�� Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attorney F: LIEN/ MSTR RESOLUTION 2951633 OR; 3002 PG; 25411 RECORDED In OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/20/2002 at 02:39PN DWIGHT F. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 10,50 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 1240 16A 8 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FAST, SCOTT & TAMMY DATE: FEB 2 6 2002 5442 27TH AVE SE NAPLES, FL 34116 REF. INVN 2047 FOLIO #: 36321840007 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 9, Block 221, Golden Gate Subdivision, Unit No. 6, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat book 5, pages 124 through 134, inclusive, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. You, as the owner(s) of the property above - described, as recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Property Appraiser, are hereby advised that the Code Enforcement Director, did determine a public nuisance existed and constituted a violation of county regulations on November 09, 2001, and ordered the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on the above property 0 prohibited by Ordinance No. 99 -51, as amended and served a notice of violation upon you. The G.J nuisance is: o C� n� WEEDS: ACCUMULATION OF WEEDS, GRASS, OR OTHER NON - PROTECTED �v OVERGROWTH IN EXCESS OF 18" You have failed to timely abate such nuisance; whereupon, it was abated by the expenditure of public funds at a direct cost of FIFTY -FIVE ($55.00) DOLLARS and an administrative cost of Two - hundred ($200.00) dollars for a total of TWO - HUNDRED FIFTY- FIVE ($255.00) DOLLARS. Such cost, by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, shall become a lien on your property when recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COUNTY. F: LIENS/ MSTR LNAL 16A 8 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -10 4 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99 -51, AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91 -47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99 -51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91 -47, as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together with a description of said parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable no later than twenty (20) days of the date of the Legal Notice of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the rate of twelve percent (12 %) per annum. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner(s) of said property, is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatement, to wit: NAME: GENTILE, ANDREW C LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 16, Block 35, GOLDEN GATE, Unit 2, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat book 5, pages 65 through 77, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. COST: $395.00 REFERENCE #: 2033 FOLIO #: 35758360009 The Clerk shall (by regular U.S. mail) mail a copy of this Resolution along with the Notice of Assessment of Lien to the owner(s) of the above- described property. If within twenty (20) days of the date of mailing that copy, the owner fails to deliver payment in full to Collier County, a certified copy of this Resolution and the Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, and by recording shall constitute a lien against the above - described real property, and to the extent allowed by law, shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal property owned by the noted property owner(s) in Collier County. This Resolution passed and duly adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Cotd,pt County, Florida, this 24 day of .—Gb.. , 2002. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: De-ptify Clerk Attest as to CMIroo.= Jame K. Coletta, Chairman 3I964twe °Ali. 2951634 OR: 3002 PG: 2543 Approved as to form and RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL legal sufficiency: 03/20/2002 at 02 :39PN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 10.50 Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attorney Retn: CoPIFS 1,00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BXT 7240 F: LIEN/ MSTR RESOLUTION BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN GENTILE, ANDREW C 439618 TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116 REF. INV.# 2033 FOLIO #: 35758360009 16A 8 DATE: FEB 2 6 9QQ2 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 16, Block 35, GOLDEN GATE, Unit 2, according to the plat thereof recorded in plat book 5, pages 65 through 77, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. You, as the owner(s) of the property above - described, as recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Property Appraiser, are hereby advised that the Code Enforcement Director, did determine a public nuisance existed and constituted a violation of county regulations on October 16, 2001, and ordered the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on the above property ;¢f 0 prohibited by Ordinance No. 99 -51, as amended and served a notice of violation upon you. The C..J nuisance is: o 0 N WEEDS: ACCUMULATION OF WEEDS, GRASS, OR OTHER NON - PROTECTED OVERGROWTH IN EXCESS OF 18" - - N LITTER: PROHIBITED DUMPING, ACCUMULATION, STORAGE OR BURIAL OF LITTER, WASTE OR ABANDONED PROPERTY You have failed to timely abate such nuisance; whereupon, it was abated by the expenditure of public funds at a direct cost of ONE HUNDRED NINETY -FIVE ($195.00) DOLLARS and an administrative cost of Two - hundred ($200.00) dollars for a total of THREE- HUNDRED NINETY -FIVE ($395.00) DOLLARS. Such cost, by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, shall become a lien on your property when recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COUNTY. F: LIENS/ MSTR LNAL 16A 8 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 10 5 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99 -51, AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91 -47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99 -51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91 -47, as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together with a description of said parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable no later than twenty (20) days of the date of the Legal Notice of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner(s) of said property, is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatement, to wit: NAME: HNH VENTURES, a Florida General Partnership LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4, Block 226, GOLDEN GATE, Unit No 6, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat book 5, Pages 124 through 134, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. COST: $255.00 REFERENCE #: 2041 FOLIO #: 36325040007 The Clerk shall (by regular U.S. mail) mail a copy of this Resolution along with the Notice of Assessment of Lien to the owner(s) of the above - described property. If within twenty (20) days of the date of mailing that copy, the owner fails to deliver payment in full to Collier County, a certified copy of this Resolution and the Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, and by recording shall constitute a lien against the above - described real property, and to the extent allowed by law, shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal property owned by the noted property owner(s) in Collier County. This Resolution passed and duly adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of ColliersCoquty,,Florida, this ?G day of .�_, 2002. AMST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BKO.CK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORID BY:' BY: 1.4., Depu1rk Attut jp C�MiI•: Jam N. Coletta, Chairman sigasum all. Approved as to form and 2951635 OR; 3002 PG; 2545 legal sufficiency: RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/20/2002 at 02:39PY DWIGHT E, BROCK. CLERK REC FEE 10.50 Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attorney COPIES i'00 Retn; CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 7240 F: LIEN/ MSTR RESOLUTION BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN HNH VENTURES, a Florida General Partnership R/A W.J. & SHEILA B. HAMTON 493012TH AVE SW NAPLES, FL 34116 REF. INV.# 2041 FOLIO #: 36325040007 16A 8 DATE: FEB 2 6 2002 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 4, Block 226, GOLDEN GATE, Unit No 6, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat book 5, Pages 124 through 134, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. You, as the owner(s) of the property above - described, as recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Property Appraiser, are hereby advised that the Code Enforcement Director, did determine a public nuisance existed and constituted a violation of county regulations on October 30, 2001, and ordered the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on the above property prohibited by Ordinance No. 99 -51, as amended and served a notice of violation upon you. The nuisance Is: WEEDS: ACCUMULATION OF WEEDS, GRASS, OR OTHER NON - PROTECTED OVERGROWTH IN EXCESS OF 18" You have failed to timely abate such nuisance; whereupon, it was abated by the expenditure of public funds at a direct cost of FIFTY -FIVE ($55.00) DOLLARS and an administrative cost of Two - hundred ($200.00) dollars for a total of TWO - HUNDRED FIFTY- FIVE ($255.00) DOLLARS. Such cost, by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, shall become a lien on your property when recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COUNTY. F: LIENS/ MSTR LNAL Z go C C •-c c a 16A 8 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -10 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99 -51, AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91 -47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99 -51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91 -47, as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together with a description of said parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable no later than twenty (20) days of the date of the Legal Notice of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the rate of twelve percent (12 %) per annum. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that lot(s) 22 of the property described as follows, having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner(s) of said property, is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatement, to wit: NAME: J M K INDUSTRIES, INC., a Florida Corporation LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot(s) 20 and 22, Block M, Embassy Woods Golf & Country Club at Brettone Park, Phase One, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 17, Page 47, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. COST: $255.00 REFERENCE #: 2052 FOLIO #: # 31055005252 The Clerk shall (by regular U.S. mail) mail a copy of this Resolution along with the Notice of Assessment of Lien to the owner(s) of the above - described property. If within twenty (20) days of the date of mailing that copy, the owner fails to deliver payment in full to Collier County, a certified copy of this Resolution and the Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, and by recording shall constitute a lien against the above - described real property, and to the extent allowed by law, shall also be a lien upon all other real and /or personal property owned by the noted property owner(s) in Collier County. This Resolution passed and duly adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of o11 e l zy, Florida, this A4 day of j!." & , 2002. '1TEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS .-DWIGHT E. °ROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, F GRID B .nsw� B Y: i as t0 CMIrs" S James N. Coletta, Chairman puty erk s 1 patIN"! sell. Approved as to form and 2951636 OR; 3002 PG; 2547 legal sufficiency: RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL - 03/20/2002 at 02:39PN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 10.50 Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attorney COPIES 1.00 Rem CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EKT 7240 F: LIEN/ MSTR RESOLUTION BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN J M K INDUSTRIES INC., A Florida Corporation 2375 TAMIAMI TRAIL N. NAPLES, FL 34103 REF.INV.# 2052 FOLIO # 31055005252 16A a DATE: FEB 2 6 2002 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot(s) 20 & 22, Block M, Embassy Woods Golf & Country Club at Brettone Park, Phase One, according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 17, Page 47, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. You, as the owner(s) of the property above - described, as recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Property Appraiser, are hereby advised that the Code Enforcement Director, did determine a public nuisance existed on lot 22, and constituted a violation of county regulations on November 1, 2001, and ordered the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on the above property prohibited by Ordinance No. 99 -51, as amended and served a notice of violation upon you. The nuisance is: WEEDS: ACCUMULATION OF WEEDS, GRASS, OR OTHER NON - PROTECTED OVERGROWTH IN EXCESS OF 18" You have failed to timely abate such nuisance; whereupon, it was abated by the expenditure of public funds at a direct cost of FIFTY -FIVE ($55.00) DOLLARS and an administrative cost of Two - hundred ($200.00) dollars for a total of TWO - HUNDRED FIFTY- FIVE ($255.00) DOLLARS. Such cost, by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, shall become a lien on your property when recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COUNTY. F: LIENS/ MSTR LNAL 16A 8 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -10 7 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99 -51, AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91 -47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99 -51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91 -47, as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together with a description of said parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable no later than twenty (20) days of the date of the Legal Notice of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner(s) of said property, is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatement, to wit: NAME: POLANCO, ALBERTO & DENISE LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 10, Kirtland Pines, in accordance with and subject to the plat recorded in Plat Book 16, Pages 73 and 74, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. COST: $255.00 REFERENCE #: 2037 FOLIO #: # 53125000505 The Clerk shall (by regular U.S. mail) mail a copy of this Resolution along with the Notice of Assessment of Lien to the owner(s) of the above - described property. If within twenty (20) days of the date of mailing that copy, the owner fails to deliver payment in full to Collier County, a certified copy of this Resolution and the Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, and by recording shall constitute a lien against the above- described real property, and to the extent allowed by law, shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal property owned by the noted property owner(s) in Collier County. This Resolution passed and dul adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier nnty, Florida, this day of y '2002. L y4 .; ATTESTi , `'-' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E, BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, LORID 1� BY: = rlerk as A't James N. Coletta, Chairman signature only' 2951637 OR; 3002 PG; 2549 Approved as to form and RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL legal sufficiency: 0312012002 at 02:39PN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 10,50 COPIES 1.00 Thomas . Palmer, Assistant County Attorney Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT ?240 F: LIEN/ MSTR RESOLUTION BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN POLANCO, ALBERT & DENISE 6741 LIVINGSTON WOODS LN NAPLES, FL 34109 REF.INV.# 2037 FOLIO # 53125000505 16A 8 DATE: FEB 2 6 2002 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 10, Kirtland Pines, in accordance with and subject to the plat recorded in Plat Book 16, Pages 73 and 74, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. You, as the owner(s) of the property above - described, as recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Property Appraiser, are hereby advised that the Code Enforcement Director, did determine a public nuisance existed and constituted a violation of county regulations on October 15, 2001, and ordered the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on the above property ,E prohibited by Ordinance No. 99 -51, as amended and served a notice of violation upon you. The o nuisance is: c.s c� v WEEDS: ACCUMULATION OF WEEDS, GRASS, OR OTHER NON - PROTECTED N OVERGROWTH IN EXCESS OF 18" You have failed to timely abate such nuisance; whereupon, it was abated by the cv �n expenditure of public funds at a direct cost of FIFTY -FIVE ($55.00) DOLLARS and an administrative cost of Two - hundred ($200.00) dollars for a total of TWO - HUNDRED FIFTY - FIVE ($255.00) DOLLARS. Such cost, by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, shall become a lien on your property when recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COUNTY. F: LIENS/ MSTR LNAL 16A 8 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -10 g A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99 -51, AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91 -47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99 -51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91 -47, as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together with a description of said parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable no later than twenty (20) days of the date of the Legal Notice of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the rate of twelve percent (12 %) per annum. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, having been abated of. a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner(s) of said property, is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatement, to wit: NAME: RODRIGUEZ, LEOVIGILDO LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 6, BLOCK 202, GOLDEN GATE UNIT 6, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, OF RECORD IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE(S) 124 THROUGH 134, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA COST: $255.00 REFERENCE #: 2034 FOLIO #: 36317120003 The Clerk shall (by regular U.S. mail) mail a copy of this Resolution along with the Notice of Assessment of Lien to the owner(s) of the above - described property. If within twenty (20) days of the date of mailing that copy, the owner fails to deliver payment in full to Collier County, a certified copy of this Resolution and the Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, and by recording shall constitute a lien against the above - described real property, and to the extent allowed by law, shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal property owned by the noted property owner(s) in Collier County. This Resolution passed and du I adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier' �Cnq ty, Florida, thisgG day of , 2002. �ATT> ST :,: �.._ t BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS �D "GWT E. ARQCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORID t. B+i361 BY: Jerk Jame K. Coletta, Chairman Approved as to form and 2951638 OR : 3002 PG : 2551 legal sufficiency: RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/20/2002 at 02:39PH DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK REC FEB 10.30 COPIES 1.00 Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attorney Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 7240 F: LIEN/ MSTR RESOLUTION 16A 8 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN RODRIGUEZ, LEOVIGILDO DATE: FEB 2 6 2,002 510024 TH AVE SW #1 NAPLES, FL 34116 REF. INV.# 2034 FOLIO # 36317120003 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT 6, BLOCK 202, GOLDEN GATE UNIT 6, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, OF RECORD IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE(S) 124 THROUGH 134, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. You, as the owner(s) of the property above - described, as recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Property Appraiser, are hereby advised that the Code Enforcement Director, did determine a public nuisance existed and constituted a violation of county regulations on October 18, 2001, and ordered the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on the above property 0 prohibited by Ordinance No. 99 -51, as amended and served a notice of violation upon you. The C.J C� nuisance is: o N WEEDS: ACCUMULATION OF WEEDS, GRASS, OR OTHER NON - PROTECTED OVERGROWTH IN EXCESS OF 18" - - N Lrt You have failed to timely abate such nuisance; whereupon, it was abated by the N expenditure of public funds at a direct cost of FIFTY -FIVE ($55.00) DOLLARS and an administrative cost of Two - hundred ($200.00) dollars for a total of TWO - HUNDRED FIFTY- FIVE ($255.00) DOLLARS. Such cost, by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, shall become a lien on your property when recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COUNTY. F: LIENS/ MSTR LNAL 16A a RESOLUTION NO. 2002 -10 9 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99 -51, AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91 -47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99 -51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91 -47, as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together with a description of said parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable no later than twenty (20) days of the date of the Legal Notice of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the rate of twelve percent (12 %) per annum. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner(s) of said property, is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatement, to wit: NAME: DOMINGUEZ, JULIO LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 8, Block 175, Unit 5 Part — GOLDEN GATE, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 122 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. COST: $255.00 REFERENCE #: 2045 FOLIO #: 36247840000 The Clerk shall (by regular U.S. mail) mail a copy of this Resolution along with the Notice of Assessment of Lien to the owner(s) of the above - described property. If within twenty (20) days of the date of mailing that copy, the owner fails to deliver payment in full to Collier County, a certified copy of this Resolution and the Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, and by recording shall constitute a lien against the above - described real property, and to the extent allowed by law, shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal property owned by the noted property owner(s) in Collier County. This Resolution passed and duly adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier. County, Florida, this *2` day of 2002. r;TTET: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT'> . B1 jJCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORID %,Deputy �Q 1 &k James N. Coletta, Chairman Approved as to form and 2951639 OR : 3002 PG ► 2553 legal sufficiency: RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL //,^, 03/20/2002 at 02:39PM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK V W\ REC FEE i0.50 Thomas Palmer, Assistant County Attorney Retn: COPIES i'00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 7240 F: LIEN/ MSTR RESOLUTION 16A 8 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN DOMINGUEZ, JULIO DATE: FEB 2 6 2002 74 ASHLEY ST BRIDGEPORT, CT 66101617 REF. INV.# 2045 FOLIO #: 36247840000 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 8, Block 175, Unit 5 Part — GOLDEN GATE, according to plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 5, Page 122 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. You, as the owner(s) of the property above - described, as recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Property Appraiser, are hereby advised that the Code Enforcement Director, did determine a public nuisance existed and constituted a violation of county regulations on November 9, 2001, and ordered the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on the above property 0 prohibited by Ordinance No. 99 -51, as amended and served a notice of violation upon you. The ?� w Q nuisance is: c, N WEEDS: ACCUMULATION OF WEEDS, GRASS, OR OTHER NON - PROTECTED OVERGROWTH IN EXCESS OF 18" N You have failed to timely abate such nuisance; whereupon, it was abated by the c` expenditure of public funds at a direct cost of FIFTY -FIVE ($55.00) DOLLARS and an"� administrative cost of Two - hundred ($200.00) dollars for a total of TWO - HUNDRED FIFTY- FIVE ($255.00) DOLLARS. Such cost, by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, shall become a lien on your property when recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COUNTY. F: LIENS/ MSTR LNAL 16A 8 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 110 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PROVIDING FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF LIEN FOR THE COST OF THE ABATEMENT OF PUBLIC NUISANCE, IN ACCORDANCE WITH ORDINANCE No. 99 -51, AS SUCCESSOR TO ORDINANCE No. 91 -47, AS AMENDED WHEREAS, as provided in Ordinance No. 99 -51, as successor to Ordinance No. 91 -47, as amended, the direct costs of abatement of certain nuisances, including prescribed administrative cost incurred by the County, shall be assessed against such property; and WHEREAS, the cost thereof to the County as to each parcel shall be calculated and reported to the Board of County Commissioners, together with a description of said parcel; and WHEREAS, such assessment shall be a legal, valid and binding obligation upon the property against which made until paid; and WHEREAS, the assessment shall become due and payable no later than twenty (20) days of the date of the Legal Notice of Assessment and interest shall accrue on the unpaid balance beginning on the date this Resolution is recorded at the rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the property described as follows, having been abated of a public nuisance after due and proper notice thereof to the owner(s) of said property, is hereby assessed the following costs of such abatement, to wit: NAME: WALKER, JAMES L. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: GOLDEN GATE, Unit 4 Blk 135 Lot 12, Collier County, Florida. COST: $255.00 REFERENCE #: 2068 FOLIO #: 36122560007 The Clerk shall (by regular U.S. mail) mail a copy of this Resolution along with the Notice of Assessment of Lien to the owner(s) of the above - described property. If within twenty (20) days of the date of mailing that copy, the owner fails to deliver payment in full to Collier County, a certified copy of this Resolution and the Notice of Assessment shall be recorded in the official records of Collier County, and by recording shall constitute a lien against the above - described real property, and to the extent allowed by law, shall also be a lien upon all other real and/or personal property owned by the noted property owner(s) in Collier County. This Resolution passed and duly adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of , 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGiT :.BROOK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY. BY: Deputy Jerk We' st as to Cha1�" -a J es N. Coletta, Chairman 319natere only. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attorney F: LIEN/ MSTR RESOLUTION 2951640 OR; 3002 PG; 2555 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/20/2002 at 02 :39PN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 10.50 COPIES i,00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EIT 1240 16A S BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THROUGH ITS CODE ENFORCEMENT DEPARTMENT COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA LEGAL NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT OF LIEN WALKER, JAMES L. DATE: FEB 2 6 2002 720 BANYAN BLVD. NAPLES, FL 34102 REF. INV.# 2068 FOLIO #: 36122560007 LIEN NUMBER: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Golden Gate Unit�Blk 135 Lot 12 Collier County, Florida. You, as the owner(s) of the property above - described, as recorded in the records maintained by the office of the Property Appraiser, are hereby advised that the Code Enforcement Director, did determine a public nuisance existed and constituted a violation of county regulations on November 19, 2001, and ordered the abatement of a certain nuisance existing on the above property prohibited by Ordinance No. 99 -51, as amended and served a notice of violation upon you. The ,'EE 0 nuisance is: ' WEEDS: ACCUMULATION OF WEEDS, GRASS, OR OTHER NON - PROTECTED C,J c OVERGROWTH IN EXCESS OF 18" N ry You have failed to timely abate such nuisance; whereupon, it was abated by the • - N expenditure of public funds at a direct cost of FIFTY -FIVE ($55.00) DOLLARS and an Two - hundred ($200.00) dollars for a total of TWO - HUNDRED FIFTY- administrative cost of FIVE ($255.00) DOLLARS. Such cost, by Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, shall become a lien on your property when recorded after approval by the Board. FAILURE TO TIMELY PAY THE AMOUNT SPECIFIED IN THIS NOTICE MAY RESULT IN A LIEN AGAINST ALL OF YOUR PROPERTY IN COLLIER COUNTY. F: LIENS/ MSTR LNAL 16P. 9 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 111 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, GRANTING IMPACT FEE WAIVERS ON BEHALF OF TWO (2) SPECIFIED TAX EXEMPTED, NOT - FOR - PROFIT, CHARITABLE, ENTITIES FOR WHICH THE COLLIER COUNTY BUILDING PERMITS FOR THE RESPECTIVE WAIVER ELIGIBLE CONSTRUCTION WERE ISSUED AFTER SEPTEMBER 7, 2001 AND BEFORE OCTOBER 13, 2001 AND THE ENTITIES PAID THE IMPACT FEES IN FULL, THOSE TWO (2) ENTITIES BEING THE NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH CLINIC AND PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF COLLIER COUNTY, INC.; AND AUTHORIZING COUNTY STAFF TO PROCESS PARTIAL REIMBURSEMENTS OF SUCH PREVIOUSLY PAID IMPACT FEES IN AMOUNTS NOT TO EXCEED IN TOTAL THE CUMULATIVE SUM OF FIFTEEN THOUSAND DOLLARS. WHEREAS, on October 9, 2001, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County adopted the current impact fee waiver provisions for charitable organizations by application of Ordinance No. 2001 -54, thereby amending the Chapter 74 of the County's Code of Laws and Ordinances, as previously amended by Ordinance No. 2001 -13 - (The Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance); and WHEREAS, on February 12, 2002, the Board adopted an ordinance amending the Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, thereby authorizing staff to accept applications for impact fee waivers for charitable organizations provided the respective impact fee waiver eligible developments were authorized by Collier County building permits issued after September 7, 2001 and before October 13, 2001 and the developments paid the applicable impact fees in full; and WHEREAS, Two (2) not - for - profit entities, the Neighborhood Health Clinic and Planned Parenthood of Collier County, Inc., having previously been issued building permits after September 7, 2001 and before October 13, 2001, have submitted applications for impact fee waivers in conformance with the application requirements of the Section 74- 203.I. of the Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinance, each of the two (2) applications for the amount of $7,500, for a total of $15,000; and WHEREAS, County staff has reviewed said applications and, having found them complete and the applicants eligible for waivers, has by Executive Summary has recommended their approval by the Board; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: 16P. 9 1. Applications for impact fee waivers of $7,500 each to two (2) charitable organizations, the Neighborhood Health Clinic and Planned Parenthood of Collier County, Inc., for building permits issued between September 7, 2001 and September 13, 2001, are approved and grants said waivers each in the amount of $7,500, for a total of $15,000. 2. County staff is directed to process partial impact fee reimbursements of Road, Emergency Medical Services and Correctional Facilities Impact Fees, each in an amount in proportion to the amount paid relative to the other applicable impact fees prior to issuance of the subject building permits. THIS RESOLUTION is adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring adoption this R4.,Z G day of NZQ. ! "r , 2002. L^ ATTEST `r''' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 1.`bWj E. 4 ockx,Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, RIDA �y, _�1�,.,,,,✓ By: �'� • iu,t)�Clerk James N. Coletta, Chairman AUK H to ma i rs"': st d Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: L Thomas C. Palmer, Assistant County Attorney 16A10 LEASE AGREEMENT OF LEASE made this day of January, 2002 between C.P.O.C. REALTY, AN ILLINOIS LIMITED LIABILITY CORPORATION, C/O WELSH COMPANIES FL., INC., as agent for OWNER, (hereinafter referred to as "Landlord ") and COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA (hereinafter referred to as "Tenant "). The following Schedule (the "Schedule ") is an integral part of this Lease, as are all of the Exhibits referred to in this Lease. The Schedule, the Exhibits, and the numbered paragraphs of this Lease, collectively, contain the terms and conditions of the Lease Agreement between the Landlord and Tenant. SCHEDULE 1. Name of Tenant :............... ........................Collier County Board of Commissioners. 2. Tenant's address for notices before possession date: 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112. 3. Area being leased ( "Demised Premises"): ............... 3050 N. Horseshoe Drive, Suite 145. 4. Net Rentable Square Feet in Demise premises: ....................................... 1,666 sq ft. 5. Tenant's use of Demised Premises: ....................................... Administrative Offices. 6. Base Rent (per year for the First year): ............................... $24,157.00 plus sales tax. 7. Monthly Installments of Base Rent for the First year: ............... $2,013.08 plus sales tax. 8. Price per square foot for the First year: ......................................... $14.50 per sq. ft. 9. Escalations: .............................................................................. 4% annually. 10. Due at signing: .................................................................................... N/A. 11. Tenant's Proportionate Share of Building: ................................................... 3.0 %. 12. Security Deposit payable on execution of Lease: ............................................ N/A. 13. Tenant's Real Estate Broker used for this lease: ............................................. N /A. 14. Tenant improvements, if any: ................................................................... N/A. 15. Commencement Date: ............................................................... March 1, 2002. 16. Term: ................................................................................... Two (2) years. 17. Renewal Option: ................................................................................. N /A. 18. The Florida State sales tax and any similar local tax shall be applicable to the Base Rent, Additional Rent, and the Index Rent, if any, and shall be paid by Tenant and shall be at the rate applicable by state and local law at the time said payments are due, currently six (6 %) percent. 19. Landlord's name and Address for notices: ............................ C.P.O.C. Realty, L.L.C., ....c /o Welsh Companies FL., Inc., 2400 Ninth Street North, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34103. 16A10 I 1. DEMISED PREMISES: Landlord leases to Tenant and Tenant rents from Landlord those certain premises more particularly described as: 3050 N. Horseshoe Drive, Suite 145, Naples, FL 34104 (the "Demised Premises "). 2. LENGTH OF TERM: The term, Commencement Date, and Termination Date of this Lease are set forth in the Schedule of this Lease. 3. BASE RENT: (a) The fixed base Rent (also referred to as base rent) during the term of this Lease shall be payable by Tenant in equal monthly installments on the first day of each month in advance and shall be at the annual rate as follows: Period Monthly Base Rent State Sales Tax '6% Total Monthly Base t Rent 4 c 3/1/02 — 2/28/03 $2,013.08 $1 .79 $2,13 .87 3/1/03 — 2/28/04 $2,093.61 2f25.62 $;,,-f 19.33 (b) The phrase "Base Rent" shall mean the fixed minimum rent above specified without any set -offs or deductions whatsoever and without any prior demand being required therefore. (c) Additional Rent, as herein defined, shall be payable by Tenant in equal monthly installments on the first day of each month in advance during the term of the Lease, together with all applicable sales tax. Landlord reasonably estimates that the Additional Rent (exclusive of sales tax) for calendar year 2002 is estimated to be Four hundred Eighty -five dollars and Ninety -two cents ($485.92) per month, plus sales tax. However, no warranties or representations are made by Landlord as to the accuracy of this estimate of Additional Rent, which estimate is given to Tenant only for Tenant's planning purposes. The actual amount of Additional Rent shall be computed as soon as practical following the end of the calendar year, at which time the actual amount of Additional Rent that was due Landlord by Tenant for calendar year 2002 shall be computed. Any amounts still due and owning Landlord for Tenant for Additional Rent for calendar year 2002 shall be paid by Tenant to Landlord within thirty (30) days of Landlord's demand for same; any overage paid by Tenant to Landlord for Additional Rent for calendar year shall be applied against the Additional Rent liability owed to Landlord by Tenant for calendar year 2003. The same policy will apply to subsequent lease years. 4. ADDITIONAL RENT: In addition to the foregoing Base Rent, all other payments to be made by Tenant shall be deemed to be and shall become Additional Rent hereunder whether or not the same be designated as such; and shall be due and payable upon demand or together with the next succeeding installment of rent, whichever shall first occur; and Landlord shall have the same remedies, for failure to pay the same as for a non - payment of Base Rent. Only after Landlord has provided proper notice to Tenant and the approproriate cure period has expired, Landlord, at its election, shall have the right to pay or do any act which requires the expenditure of any sums of money by reason of the failure or neglect of Tenant to perform any of the provisions of this Lease, and in the event Landlord shall at its election pay such sums or do such acts requiring the expenditure of monies, Tenant agrees to pay Landlord, upon demand, all such 1 ti I- 16A10 i sums, and the sum so paid by Landlord, together with interest thereon, shall be deemed Additional Rent and payable as such. 5. PLACE OF PAYMENTS: All payment required to be paid by Tenant to Landlord shall be delivered to: Landlord's address as shown on the Schedule on Page 1, without any prior demand for the same. 6. LIMITATIONS OF REPRESENTATIONS: The Demised Premises are leased pursuant to the terms and conditions set forth in this Lease. Neither Landlord nor Landlord's agents have made any representations, warranties or promises with respect to the Demised Premises, except as set forth in this Lease. 7. TENANT'S INSTALLATIONS AND IMPROVEMENTS: The Landlord shall provide the Demised Premises according to "Exhibit B" at Landlord's expense. Tenant shall fully equip the Demised Premises with all equipment necessary for the proper operation of Tenant's business. Tenant Alterations: Tenant agrees not to make any alterations or additions that would materially change the Demised Premises or the appearance of the same from that previously approved by Landlord, nor to install any additional equipment therein without, in each instance, obtaining the prior written consent of Landlord. All alterations and additions to the Demised Premises shall be made in accordance with all applicable laws, and where applicable, Tenant shall be required to obtain all necessary governmental permits prior to commencing. Tenant hereby agrees to indemnify and holds Landlord harmless from all expenses, liens, claims, or damages, to either persons or property or the Demised Premises, arising out of or resulting from the undertaking, making of, or the existence of such alterations or additions. In the event Tenant, at any time during the Lease Term, removes any of its trade fixtures, any damage caused by such removal shall be repaired and the trade fixtures shall be replaced within three (3) business days with fixtures of similar quality and sufficient quantity to conduct Tenant's business. 8. USE OF DEMISED PREMISES: Tenant shall use the Demised Premises for the purposes indicated on the Schedule on page 1 of this Lease and no other. Tenant shall not use or permit or suffer the use of the Demised Premises for any other business or purpose, without the Landlord's prior consent, which may be withheld. 9. OPERATION OF BUSINESS: Tenant shall (a) conduct its business in the entire Demised Premises; (b) remain open for business during customary business days and hours; (c) keep the Demised Premises and exterior and interior portions of windows, doors and all other glass or plate glass fixtures in a neat, clean, sanitary and safe condition; (d) neither solicit business nor distribute advertising matter in the parking or other common areas. 10. LAWS, WASTE OR NUISANCE: Tenant shall, at its sole cost and expense; (a) comply with all governmental laws, ordinances, orders and regulations affecting the Demised Premises now in force or which hereafter may be in force; (b) comply with and execute all rules, requirements and regulations of the Board of Fire Underwriters, Landlord's insurance companies and other organizations establishing insurance rates; (c) not suffer, permit or commit any waste or nuisance; and (d) not conduct any auction, distress, fire or bankruptcy sale. 16A10 i 11. AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT: Landlord shall, at its sole cost and expense, be responsible for compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act. 12. SIGNS, AWNINGS AND CANOPIES: The Tenant shall not place or suffer to be placed or maintain any sign, awning or canopy in, upon or outside the Demised Premises or in the Building or within a half mile of the Building; nor shall Tenant place in the display windows any sign, decoration, lettering or advertising matter or other thing of any kind without first obtaining Landlord's written approval and consent in each instance. Tenant shall maintain any such sign or other installation as may be approved in good condition and repair. 13. ASSIGNMENT AND SUBLETTING: Tenant shall first obtain the written consent of Landlord, which may not be unreasonably withheld by Landlord, in the exercise of Landlord's discretion. No assignment shall relieve or discharge the Tenant from its obligations hereunder. The Tenant shall not sublet the Demised Premises without Landlord's consent. 14. REPAIRS: Landlord shall not be required to make any repairs or improvements of any kind upon the Demised Premises except for necessary exterior structural repairs and those repairs which relate to the common facilities and common property. Tenant shall, at its sole cost and expense, take good care of and make necessary repairs and replacements, structural and otherwise, to the interior of the Demised Premises and the fixtures and equipment therein and appurtenances thereto, including the exterior and interior windows, doors and entrances, sidewalks, fronts, signs, floor coverings, interior walls, columns and partitions. Tenant agrees to keep and maintain in good condition the electrical equipment and heating and cooling equipment in the Demised Premises. 15. TENANT'S FAILURE TO REPAIR: If Tenant (a) refuses or neglects to make repairs, or (b) if Landlord is required to make exterior or structural repairs by reason of Tenant's negligent acts or omissions, Landlord shall have the right, but shall not be obligated, to make such repairs on behalf of and for the account of Tenant. In such event, such work shall be paid by Tenant as Additional Rent promptly upon receipt of a bill thereof. 16. CONSTRUCTION LIENS: Should any construction or other liens be filed against the Demised Premises or any part thereof for any reason whatsoever by reason of Tenant's acts or omissions or because of a claim against Tenant, Tenant shall cause the same to be canceled and discharged of record by bond or otherwise upon reasonable notice by Landlord. In the event Tenant does not cause the same to be canceled and discharged within ten (10) days of receipt of said notice, Landlord may cause the same to be canceled and discharged and Tenant shall be responsible to pay Landlord all reasonable costs and expenses incurred to discharge said lien together with interest at the maximum allowable rate. 17. UTILITY CHARGES: Landlord shall not be liable in the event of any interruption in the supply of any utilities. Tenant agrees that it will not install any equipment which will exceed or overload the capacity of any utility facilities and that if any equipment installed by Tenant shall require additional utility facilities, the same will be installed at Tenant's expense in accordance with plans and specifications to be approved in writing by Landlord. Tenant shall be solely responsible for and shall promptly pay all charges for use of consumption for electricity, unless such charges are a part of the common expenses as described herein. Tenant agrees to purchase and pay for water and sewer. 16A10 18. TAXES: Landlord shall pay all real property taxes which may be levied or assessed by any lawful authority against the land, the Building, and improvements in the Building. Tenant shall pay as Additional Rent, within ten (10) days after a demand is made by the Landlord, its proportionate share of any real property taxes, levied or assessed and its proportionate share of any other charges or levies made by any lawful authority against the land and improvements of the Building. If taxes are paid in arrears, the Landlord shall have the right to collect such funds in advance, on a monthly basis, during the Lease year based upon last year's taxes or some other reasonable method of calculating what such taxes shall be. The proportion to be paid is based upon Tenant's proportionate share of the Building as set forth in the Schedule on Page 1 of this Lease. The Tenant's share of taxes shall be collected as Additional Rent in advance in equal monthly installments, the amount of which shall be computed by the Landlord based upon his reasonable calculation of the taxes that will be owed for the property when such taxes are payable. If the total of such monthly remittances is greater than the Additional Rent due hereunder for the tax year, Tenant may credit the difference against the next installment of Additional Rent due to Landlord hereunder. If the total of such remittances is less than the Additional Rent due for such tax year, Tenant shall pay the difference to Landlord at the time that Landlord provides a certification that explains the additional amount due. Tenant shall pay all assessments and all taxes levied on its own personal property. Tenant shall further pay, as Additional Rent, any tax that may be levied, or assessed upon the rent payable hereunder by any governmental authority acting under any present or future laws. However, such obligation shall not include the Landlord's obligation to pay income tax. Tenant shall not have the right to make application for or to bring proceedings related to the assessed valuation of any land or building in the Building. 19. MAINTENANCE OF COMMON AREAS: All common areas and other facilities in or about the Building provided by Landlord shall be subject to the exclusive control and management of Landlord. Landlord shall have the right to change the area, level, location and arrangement of parking areas and other facilities; to restrict parking by Tenants, their officers, agents and employees; to close all or any portion of said areas or facilities to such extent as may be legally sufficient to prevent a dedication therein or the accrual of any right to any person or the public therein; to close temporarily all or any portion of the parking areas or facilities to discourage non - customer parking. Landlord shall operate and maintain the common facilities in such manner as Landlord in its discretion shall determine; but in all times in a manner befitting a first class business location, and Landlord shall have full right and authority to employ and discharge all personnel with respect thereto. 20. COMMON AREA MAINTENANCE COSTS AS ADDITIONAL RENT: Tenant, as Additional Rent, agrees to pay to Landlord, without offset of deduction, in equal monthly installments on the first day of each and every calendar month during the term hereof (pro -rata for that portion of the calendar month in which the term hereof shall commence, if such portion is shorter than a full month) as its share of the cost to Landlord of keeping and maintaining the parking areas and other common facilities, as set forth herein, an annual amount equal to (a) Tenant's pro -rata share as defined hereinafter of all costs and expenses of every kind and nature as may be paid or incurred by Landlord during the Lease Term (including appropriate reserves) in operating, managing, equipping, lighting, repairing, replacing and maintaining the common areas, parking areas, common facilities and related services, and in policing the Building and 16A10 affording protection thereof against fire and other natural disasters (if and to the extent that such policing and /or fire protection is provided) as determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and allocated to any particular fiscal year on the accrual method of accounting. 21. INSURANCE COSTS AND ADDITIONAL RENT: Landlord's Insurance. Landlord shall procure and maintain throughout the term of this Lease, a special perils insurance policy, which shall insure the Building for losses, caused by fire, windstorm, and flood. However, the parties recognize that flood insurance will not be available through a commercial carrier if the property is within an area designated by the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development as having special flood hazards. In that case, i.e., where commercial flood insurance is not available, Landlord shall also procure and maintain throughout the term of the Lease flood insurance on the Building in accordance with Title 44, Code of Federal Regulations and Title 42, United States Code. The Landlord shall also maintain liability insurance in commercially reasonable amounts. Tenant agrees that it will not keep, use, sell, or offer for sale, in or upon the Demised Premises, any article, which may be prohibited by the Landlord's insurance policy. Tenant agrees to promptly make, at Tenant's sole cost and expense, any repairs, alteration, changes and /or improvements required by the company that issues Landlord's insurance policies so as to avoid the cancellation of said insurance. Tenant's Insurance. Tenant shall, during the Lease Term, at its sole cost, risk and obligation, keep in full force and effect a policy of public liability and property damage insurance with respect to the Demised Premises, and the business conducted by Tenant and any subtenants of Tenant in the Demised Premises, in which the limits of public liability and property damage insurance shall be not less than One Million Dollars ($1,000,000.00) combined single limit. Tenant shall also carry fire and extended coverage insurance which shall cover loss and damage caused by fire, tornadoes, hurricanes, and any other natural disaster for the full replacement value of all improvements, alterations, additions and partitions whether made or installed by Landlord or Tenant in the Demised Premises; Tenant's personal property including, but not limited to, inventory, trade fixtures, equipment, furnishings and other personal property together with insurance against sprinkler damage, vandalism, theft and malicious mischief, and any and all other coverage which Tenant desires to carry or is required to carry by law. The Tenant's liability policy and casualty policy shall include Landlord, and any persons, firms or business entities having an insurable interest designated by Landlord from time to time, as additional insured, and shall contain a clause that the insurer will not cancel or change the insurance without first giving the Landlord thirty (30) days prior written notice. The insurance shall be in an insurance company licensed to do business in the State of Florida. A copy of the policy or certificate of insurance shall be delivered to Landlord prior to delivery of possession of the Demised Premises to Tenant and thereafter within thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the term of each said policy. If Tenant fails to furnish Landlord with a copy of any insurance policy required to be furnished by Tenant to Landlord when due and such failure continues for ten (10) days after written notice from Landlord, Landlord may assess and collect an administrative fee of Twenty -Five and 00/100 Dollars ($25.00) for each day such policy or certificate has not been received in the office of Landlord at the close of each business day. Additionally, if Tenant refuses or neglects to secure and maintain insurance policies complying with the provisions of this Paragraph, Landlord 16A10 may, but shall not be required to, secure and maintain such insurance policies and Tenant shall pay the cost thereof to Landlord, upon demand. Indemnification of Landlord. Tenant shall indemnify Landlord and Landlord's agents and save it harmless from and against any and all claims, actions, damages, liability and expense in connection with loss of life, personal injury and /or damage to property, or by reason of the occupancy or use by Tenant of the Demised Premises or any part thereof, or occasioned wholly or in part by any act or omission of Tenant, its agents, contractors, employees, servants, or concessionaires. In the event Landlord and /or its agents shall, without fault on their part, be made party to any litigation commenced by or against Tenant, then Tenant shall protect and hold Landlord and /or its agents harmless and shall pay all costs, expenses and reasonable attorney fees that may be incurred or paid by Landlord and /or its agents in connection with such litigation. Limitation on Landlord's Liability. Landlord and Landlord's agent and employees shall not be liable to Tenant or to anyone claiming under Tenant for damage to person or property resulting from (a) equipment or appurtenances becoming out of repair; (b) Tenant's failure to keep the Demised Premises in repair; (c) any defect in or failure of the sprinkler system, plumbing, heating or air conditioning equipment, electric wiring or installation thereof, gas, water, steam, pipes, stairs, porches, railings, or walks; (d) broken glass; (e) the backing up of any sewer pipe or downspout; (f) the bursting, leaking or running over of any tank, tub, washstand, water closet, waste pipe, drain, or any other pipe or tank, in or upon the Building or Demised Premises, or noxious odors resulting therefrom, or the escape of steam or hot water; (g) water, or ice being upon or coming through the roof, skylight, trap door, stairs, walks or any other place upon or near the Building or Demised Premises or otherwise; (h) the falling of any fixtures, plaster, or stucco; (i) any act, omission, or negligence of co- tenants or other persons or occupants of the Building or of adjoining or contiguous buildings or of owners of adjacent or contiguous property of Landlord; and 0) any act which might be considered directly caused by rodents, insects, bugs, or pests in general. Landlord agrees that Landlord and Landlord's agents shall be responsible, however, for their gross negligent acts hereunder, but only to the extent that any such damage or liability is not covered by perils against which Tenant is required by this Lease to insure. Mutual Waiver of Subrogation. The fire and extended coverage insurance policies carried by the Landlord to insure the Building and by the Tenant to insure its fixtures and personal property located in the Demised Premises shall each include or permit a waiver of all rights of subrogation as set forth below. Each of the parties (to the extent of the coverage provided by the respective insurance policies carried by such party) agrees to and does hereby waive all rights of recovery and causes of action against the other and all persons claiming through or under such other party, by way of subrogation or otherwise for any damage to the Building or Demised Premises, or the personal property, as the case may be, caused by any of the perils covered by such fire and extended coverage insurance policies (as now or hereafter constituted), notwithstanding that any such damage or destruction may be due to the negligence of such other party or of the persons claiming through or under such other party. Landlord's Right to Pay Premiums on Behalf of Tenant. All of the policies of insurance, which the Tenant is required to maintain, shall be written in form satisfactory to Landlord and by insurance companies satisfactory to Landlord. All such insurance 16A10 policies shall expressly waive any right of subrogation of the insurer against Landlord and the holder of any mortgages encumbering the Demised Premises. Tenant shall pay all of the premiums therefore and deliver such policies, or certificates thereof, to Landlord; and, in the event of the failure of Tenant either to effect such insurance in the names herein called for or to pay the premiums therefore or to deliver such policies, or certificates thereof, to Landlord, Landlord shall be entitled, but shall have no obligation, to effect such insurance and pay the premiums therefore, which premiums shall be repayable to Landlord with the next installment of rental, failure to repay the same carrying with it the same consequence as failure to pay any installment of rental. The insurance policy or policies required hereunder shall name Landlord and Tenant as insureds as their interests may appear, and each insurer shall agree by endorsement on the policy or policies issued by it or by independent instrument furnished to Landlord that it will give Landlord thirty (30) days written notice before the policy or policies in question shall be altered or canceled. Landlord agrees that it will not unreasonably withhold its approval as to the form or to the insurance companies selected by Tenant. The insurer of any policies required hereunder shall be qualified to do business in the State of Florida and shall have a "Best" rating of A or better. Definition of Full Replacement Value. The term "full replacement value" of improvements as used herein shall mean the actual replacement cost thereof from time to time. 22. DESTRUCTION: If the Demised Premises shall be partially damaged by any casualty insurable under the Landlord's insurance policy, Landlord shall, upon receipt of the insurance proceeds, repair the same and the Base Rent shall be abated proportionately as to that portion of the Demised Premises rendered untenantable. If the Demised Premises (a) by reason of such occurrence is rendered wholly untenantable or (b) should be damaged as a result of a risk which is not covered by Landlord's insurance or (c) should be damaged in whole or in part during the last year of the term or of any renewal term hereof, or (d) the building of which it is a part, whether the Demised Premises is damaged or not or all of the building which then comprise the Building should be damaged to the extent of fifty (50 %) percent or more of the then monetary value thereof, or (e) if any or all of the buildings or common areas of the Building cannot in the reasonable judgment of Landlord be operated as an integral unit, then or in any of such events, either Landlord or Tenant may cancel this Lease by notice of cancellation within ninety (90) days after such event and thereupon this Lease shall expire, and Tenant shall vacate and surrender the Demised Premises to Landlord. Tenant's liability for rent upon the termination of this Lease shall cease as of the day following the event or damage. The foregoing provisions notwithstanding, Tenant shall not have the right to cancel this Lease in the event of such destruction if Landlord shall notify Tenant within sixty (60) days after such event that Landlord intends to rebuild the Demised Premises to its condition prior to such destruction, and shall completely restore the building to a tenantable condition within 180 days after Landlord notifies Tenant of its intention to rebuild the Demised Premises to its condition prior to such destruction. In the event Landlord elects to repair the damage any abatement of rent shall end five (5) days after notice by Landlord to Tenant that the Demised Premises have been repaired. If any damage is caused by the negligence of Tenant or its employees, the damages shall be repaired by Landlord, upon receipt of the insurance proceeds, but there shall be no abatement of rent. 23. CONDEMNATION: 16A10 Total. If the whole of the Demised Premises shall be acquired or taken by eminent domain for any public or quasi - public use or purpose then this Lease and the term herein shall cease and terminate as of the date of title vesting in such proceeding. Partial. If any part of the Demised Premises shall be taken as aforesaid, and such partial taking shall render that portion not so taken unsuitable for the business of Tenant, in the reasonable judgment of Tenant, then this Lease and the term herein shall cease and terminate as aforesaid. If such partial taking is not extensive enough to render the Demised Premises unsuitable for the business of Tenant, in the reasonable judgment of Tenant, then this Lease shall continue in effect except that the Base Rent shall be reduced in the same proportion that the floor area of the Demised Premises taken bears to the original floor area demised and Landlord shall, upon receipt of the award in condemnation, make all necessary repair or alterations to the building in which the Demised Premises are located so as to constitute the portion of the building not taken a complete architectural unit, but such work shall not exceed the scope of the work to be done by Landlord in originally constructing said building, nor shall Landlord in any event be required to spend for such work an amount in excess of the amount received by Landlord as damages for the part of the Demised Premises so taken. "Amount received by Landlord" shall mean that part of the award in condemnation, which is free and clear to Landlord of any collection by mortgages for the value of the diminished fee. If more than twenty (20 %) percent of the floor area of the building in which the Demised Premises are located shall be taken as aforesaid, either Tenant or Landlord may, by written notice to the other party, terminate this Lease, such termination to be effective as aforesaid. If this Lease is terminated as provided in this paragraph, the rent shall be paid up to the day of title vesting in such public authority and Landlord shall make an equitable refund of any rent paid by Tenant in advance. Tenant shall have the right to claim from condemnor but not from Landlord such compensation as may be recoverable by Tenant in its own right for diminution in value of its Leasehold interest and for damage to Tenant's business, fixtures and improvements installed by Tenant at its own expense. 24. DEFAULT: Tenant shall be deemed in default hereunder in the event Tenant fails to keep and perform any of its covenants or obligations hereunder. In the event of any breach of this Lease by Tenant, Landlord, in addition to the other rights or remedies it may have, shall have the immediate right of re -entry and may remove all persons and property from the Demised Premises; and such property may be removed and stored in a public warehouse or elsewhere at the cost of and for the account of Tenant. Should Landlord elect to re -enter as herein provided, or should it take possession pursuant to legal proceedings or pursuant to any notice provided for by law, Landlord may either terminate this Lease or may from time to time, without terminating this Lease, re -let the Demised Premises or any part thereof for such term or terms (which may be for a term extending beyond the Lease Term) and at such rental or rentals and on such other terms and conditions as Landlord in its sole discretion may deem advisable, with the right to make alterations and repairs to the Demised Premises. On each such re- letting (a) Tenant shall be immediately liable to pay to Landlord, in addition to any indebtedness other than rent due hereunder, the expenses of such re- letting and of such alterations and repairs incurred by Landlord; and the amount, if any, by which the rent in this instant Lease for the period of such re- letting (up to but not beyond the Lease Term) exceeds the amount agreed to be paid as rent for the Demised Premises for such period on such re- letting; or (b) at the option of Landlord, rents received by Landlord from such re- letting shall be applied first to the payment of any indebtedness, other than rent due hereunder from Tenant to Landlord; second, to the payment of 16A10 any expenses of such re- letting and of such alterations and repairs; third, to the payment of rent due and unpaid hereunder; and the residue, if any, shall be held by Landlord and applied in payment of future rent as the same may become due and payable hereunder. If, after the application of rent amounts received from re- renting, there is a deficit, the Tenant shall be liable for said deficit. Such deficiency shall be calculated and due and payable in full immediately upon Landlord's demand. No such re -entry or taking possession of the Demised Premises by Landlord shall be construed as an election on the part of Landlord to terminate this Lease unless a written notice of such intention is given to Tenant or unless the termination thereof is decreed by a court of competent jurisdiction. In the event the Landlord is unable to re -rent the Demised Premises, the Tenant shall remain wholly liable for all rental and other obligations provided for herein. 25. ACCESS TO DEMISED PREMISES: Landlord shall have the right to place, maintain and repair all utility equipment of any kind in, upon and under the Demised Premises as may be necessary for the servicing of the Demised Premises and other portions of the Building. Landlord shall also have the right to enter the Demised Premises during regular business hours to inspect or to exhibit the same to prospective purchasers, mortgagees, Tenants and to make such repairs, additions, alterations or improvements as Landlord may deem desirable, but in no event shall Landlord take any action not in accordance with Tenant's reasonable security procedures. Landlord shall be allowed to take all reasonable material in, to and upon said Demised Premises that may be required therefore without the same constituting an eviction of Tenant in whole or in part and the rents reserved shall in no way abate while said work is in progress by reason of loss or interruption of Tenant's business. The provisions of this paragraph shall in no way be construed to impose upon Landlord any obligation whatsoever for the maintenance or repair of the building or any part thereof except as otherwise herein specifically provided. During the sixty (60) days prior to the expiration of this Lease or any renewal term, Landlord may place upon the Demised Premises "For Lease" signs, which Tenant shall permit to remain thereon. 26. SUBORDINATION: Tenant agrees that its Lease Interest is subordinate to the lien of any mortgage, ground lease or any other method of financing or refinancing now or hereafter placed against the Building, the land and /or the Demised Premises and to any and all advances made or to be made thereunder and to all renewals, replacements, consolidations and extensions thereof. This paragraph shall be self - operative and no further instrument of subordination shall be required, however, if requested, the Tenant shall execute and deliver to Landlord, a signed subordination of its Lease to any particular mortgagee that is encumbering the property. 27. LANDLORD'S LIABILITY: Tenant shall look solely to the estate and property of the Landlord in the land and improvements comprising the Building for the collection of any judgment (or other judicial process) requiring the payment of money by Landlord in the event of any default or breach by Landlord with respect to any of the terms, covenants, and conditions of this Lease to be observed and /or performed by Landlord, and no other property or assets of the Landlord shall be subject to levy, execution or other enforcement procedures for the satisfaction of Tenant's remedies. 28. QUIET ENJOYMENT: Tenant, upon paying the rents, and performing all of the terms on its part to be performed, shall peaceably and quietly enjoy the Demised Premises subject, nevertheless, to the terms of this Lease and to any mortgage, ground lease or agreements to which the Lease is subordinated. 16A10 29. FORCE MAJEURE: Landlord and Tenant shall be excused for the period of any delay in the performance of any obligations hereunder when prevented from so doing by cause or causes beyond Landlord's control which shall include, without limitation, all labor disputes, civil commotion, war, war -like operations, invasion, rebellion, hostilities, military or usurped power, sabotage, governmental regulations or controls, fire or other casualty, inability to obtain any material services or financing or reason of any other acts of God. 30, END OF TERM: At the expiration of this Lease, Tenant shall surrender the Demised Premises in the same condition as it was in upon delivery of possession thereto under this Lease, reasonable wear and tear excepted, and shall deliver all keys to Landlord. Before surrendering said Demised Premises, Tenant shall remove all its personal property, fixtures, alterations, additions and decorations, and shall repair any damage caused thereby. Tenant's obligations to perform this provision shall survive the end of the term of this Lease. If Tenant fails to remove its property upon the expiration of this Lease, the said property shall be deemed abandoned and shall become the property of Landlord. 31. HOLDING OVER: If the Tenant remains in the Demised Premises beyond the expiration of this Lease, such holding over shall not be deemed to create any tenancy, but the Tenant shall be a "Tenant at Sufferance" only at a daily rate equal to twice the rent and other charges under this Lease. 32. NO WAIVER: Failure of Landlord to insist upon the strict performance of any provision or to exercise any option or any rules and regulations shall not be construed as a waiver for the future of any such provision, rule or option. The receipt by Landlord of rent with knowledge of the breach of any provision of this Lease shall not be deemed as waiver of such breach. No provision of this Lease shall be deemed to have been waived unless such waiver be in writing signed by Landlord. No payment by Tenant or receipt by Landlord of a lesser amount than the monthly rent shall be deemed to be other than on account of the earliest rent then unpaid nor shall any endorsement or statement or any check or any letter accompanying any check or payment as rent be deemed an accord and satisfaction and Landlord may accept such check or payment without prejudice to Landlord's right to recover the balance of such rent or pursue any other remedy in this Lease provided, and no waiver by Landlord in respect to one Tenant shall constitute a waiver in favor of any other Tenant in the Building. 33. NOTICES: Any notice, demand, request or other instrument which may be or are required to be given under this Lease shall be delivered in person or sent by United States Certified or Registered Mail, postage prepaid, and shall be addressed as set forth on the Schedule on Page 1 of this Lease. Either party may designate such other address as shall be given by written notice. 34. RECORDING: Tenant shall not record this Lease or a memorandum thereof without the written consent of Landlord. 35. PARTIAL INVALIDITY: If any provision of this Lease or application thereof to any persons or circumstance shall to any extent be invalid, the remainder of this Lease or the application of such provision to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid shall not be affected thereby and each provision of this Lease shall be valid and enforced to the fullest extent permitted by law. 16A10 36. BROKER'S COMMISSIONS: Tenant represents and warrants that there are no claims for brokerage commissions or finder's fees in connection with the execution of this Lease, except as listed, and agrees to indemnify Landlord against and hold it harmless from all liabilities arising from any such claim, including cost of counsel fees, except as set forth in the Schedule on Page 1 of this Lease. 37. PROVISIONS BINDING, ETC: Except as otherwise expressly provided, all provisions herein shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the parties, their legal representatives successors and assigns. Each provision to be performed by Tenant shall be construed to be both a covenant and a condition, and if there shall be more than one Tenant, they shall all be bound, jointly and severally, by these provisions. 38. SALE BY LANDLORD: In the event of sale or conveyance or transfer by Landlord of its interest in the Project or in the Building or in this Lease, the same shall operate to release Landlord from any future obligations and any future liability for or under any of the covenants or conditions, express or implied, herein contained in favor of Tenant, and in such event, and with respect to such obligations, covenants and conditions, Tenant agrees to look solely to the succes- sor in interest of Landlord in and to this Lease. This Lease shall not be affected by any such sale, conveyance or transfer. 39. ESTOPPEL CERTIFICATE: Landlord shall, at the request of Tenant and Tenant shall at the request of Landlord at any time and from time to time upon not less than ten (10) days' prior written notice, execute, acknowledge in recordable form, and deliver to the other, or for the Tenant to its auditor or a prospective purchaser of its business or assets, or to its assignee or subtenant if acceptable to Landlord, or for the Landlord to Landlord's mortgagee, auditors or a prospective purchaser of the Project or any part thereof, a certificate stating that this Lease is unmodified and in full force and effect (or, if modified, stating the nature of such modification and certifying that this Lease, as so modified, is in full force and effect), and the dates to which the Rent and other charges are paid, and that Tenant is paying Rent on a current basis with no offsets or claims, and there are not, to Tenant's or Landlord's knowledge, as the case may be, any uncured defaults on the part of Landlord or of Tenant (or specifying such offsets, claims or defaults, if any are claimed). Such certificate may require the party giving it to specify the date of commencement of Rent, the Commencement Date, the Termination Date, the Base Rent, and Additional Rent estimates, the date to which Rent has been paid, whether or not Landlord has completed any improvements required to be made to the Demised Premises and such other matters as may be reasonably requested. It is expressly understood and agreed that any such statement may be relied upon by any prospective purchaser or encumbrancer of all or any portion of the Project or by any ground lessor, or by a purchaser or assignee or lender to Tenant or to auditors of either party hereto or by any other person to whom it is delivered. The failure to deliver such statement within the time required hereunder shall, at the option of the requesting party, be a default under this Lease, or be conclusive evidence, binding upon the nonperforming party that this Lease is in full force and effect, without modification except as may be represented by the requesting party, that there are no uncured defaults by the requesting party and that no more than one (1) month's Rent has been paid in advance, and the nonperforming party shall be estopped from asserting any defaults known to it at that time. 40. ENTIRE AGREEMENT, ETC.: This Lease and any exhibits and schedules hereto set forth the entire agreement between the parties. Any prior conversations or writings are merged herein and extinguished. No subsequent amendment to this Lease shall be binding upon Landlord or Tenant unless reduced to writing and signed. Submission of this Lease for examination does 16A10 not constitute an option for the Demised Premises and becomes effective as a Lease only upon execution and delivery thereof by Landlord to Tenant. If any provision contained in a rider is inconsistent with the printed provision of this Lease, the provision contained in said rider shall supersede said printed provision. The captions appearing herein are inserted only as a matter of convenience an are not intended to define, limit, construe or describe the scope or intent of any paragraph, nor in any way affect this Lease. 41. RULES AND REGULATIONS: Tenant agrees as follows: (a) All deliveries or shipments shall be made only by way of the rear of the Demised Premises or at any other location designated by Landlord, and only at such times designated for such purpose by Landlord; (b) Garbage and refuse shall be kept in the kind of container specified by Landlord and shall be placed at the location designated by Landlord, for collection at the times specified by Landlord; Tenant to pay the cost of removal; (c) No radio, television, phonograph or other similar devices, or aerial attached thereto (inside or outside) shall be installed without first obtaining in each instance the Landlord's consent in writing, and if such consent be given, no such device shall be used in a manner so as to be heard or seen outside the Demised Premises; (d) the outside area immediately adjoining the Demised Premises shall be kept clean and free from dirt and rubbish by Tenant, and Tenant shall not place, suffer or permit any obstructions in such areas; (e) Tenant shall not use the public or common areas in the Building for business purposes; (f) Plumbing facilities shall not be used for any other purpose than that for which they are construed, and no foreign substance of any kind shall be thrown therein; (g) Tenant shall use, at Tenant's cost, a pest extermination contractor at such intervals as Landlord reasonably may require; (h) Tenant shall not burn trash or garbage in or about the Demised Premises, the Building or within one mile of the outside radius of the Building; (i) Tenant shall not place, suffer or permit displays or decorations on the sidewalks in front of the Demised Premises or on or upon any of the common areas of the Building; 0) Landlord may amend or add new rules and regulations for the use and care of the Demised Premises, the building of which the Demised Premises are a part, and the common areas and facilities. 42. RADON GAS: Radon is a naturally occurring radioactive gas that, when it has accumulated in a building in sufficient quantities, may present health risks to person who are exposed to it over time. Levels of radon gas that exceed federal and state guidelines have been found in buildings in Florida. Additional information regarding radon and radon testing may be obtained from your county public health unit. 43. ZONING ORDINANCES AND RESTRICTIONS: This Lease is subject to all easements and restrictions of record and all zoning ordinances and restrictions and limitations of record regarding the same. 44. ATTORNEYS FEES: If any action at law or in equity shall be brought to recover any rent under this Lease, or for or on account of any breach of, or to enforce or interpret any of the covenants, terms, or conditions of this Lease, or for the recovery of the possession of the Demised Premises, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover from the other party as part of the prevailing party's costs all reasonable costs, charges and expenses, including without limitation attorneys' fees, paralegals' fees, or other legal costs expended or incurred in connection therewith, at trial and on appeal, the amount of which shall be fixed by the court and shall be made a part of any judgment or decree rendered, including without limitation, all court costs, attorneys' fees, paralegals' fees, and other costs incurred in the enforcement of any indemnity hereunder. 16A10 45. TIME OF THE ESSENCE: Time is of the essence of this Lease and of each and every covenant, term, condition, and provision hereof. 46. CAPTIONS: The captions appearing under the Section number designations of this Lease are for convenience only and are not a part of this Lease and do not in any way limit or amplify the terms and provisions of this Lease. 47. PARTIES DEFINED, USE OF PRONOUN: The word "Tenant" shall be deemed and taken to mean each and every person or party mentioned as Tenant herein, be the same one or more, and if there shall be more than one such person or party, any notice required or permitted by the terms of this Lease may be given by or to any one thereof. The term "Landlord" shall refer only to the current owner of the fee interest in the Demised Premises. The use of the neuter singular pronoun to refer to Landlord or Tenant shall be deemed a proper reference even though Landlord or Tenant may be an individual, a partnership, a corporation, or a group of two or more individuals or corporations. The necessary grammatical changes required to make the provisions of this Lease apply in the plural sense where there is more than one Landlord or Tenant, and to either corporations, associations, partnerships or individuals, male or female, shall in all instances be assumed as though in each case fully expressed. 48. CONSENT AND APPROVAL: Whenever this Lease specifies that either party has the right of consent or approval if either party shall desire the consent or approval of the other on any matter regarding this Lease, such consent or approval shall be effective only if in writing and signed by the consenting or approving party. 49. RELATIONSHIP OF PARTIES: Nothing in this Lease shall be deemed or construed so as to create the relationship of principal and agent, partnership, joint venture or of any association between the parties including, but not limited to, the computation of rent, or any other act of the parties, it being understood that the parties' sole relationship hereunder is that of Landlord and Tenant. 50. LEGAL INTERPRETATION: Landlord and Tenant acknowledge that this Lease was fully and jointly negotiated by the parties hereto and agree that there shall be no presumption that this Lease should be more severely construed against either party because such party may have drafted the particular language being construed. 51. APPLICABLE LAW: This Lease is made in and shall be construed according to the laws of the State of Florida. 52. CORPORATION AS TENANT: In the event the Tenant herein is a corporation, partnership, or limited liability company, simultaneously with the execution of this Lease Tenant shall deliver to Landlord a properly executed corporate resolution authorizing said business entity to enter into this Lease, together with a Certificate of Incumbency for said business entity; and Tenant shall also furnish to Landlord a Certificate a Good Standing from the state of its incorporation, which certificate shall show that said business entity is in good standing under the laws of the State and is duly qualified to conduct business in Florida. 53. SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY: All of the Tenant's promises in this agreement are subject to Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, and other applicable laws regarding Tenant's (the county's) waiver of Sovereign Immunity. 16A10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have respectively signed and sealed this Lease the day and year first above written. ATTEST: D P "O. .CK, Clerk r y it ss Approved as to form and legal sufficiency On behalf of Collier County: ?J LAA�� Thomas C. Pa mer Assistant County Attorney LANDLORD: C.P.O.C., Realty, L.L.C., an Illinois Limited Liability Corporation Welsh Companies FL., INC., a Florida Corpo ion Man er By: Its: ' ,ja Date TENANT: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLO A By: J N. COLETTA Chairman Date MEMORANDUM Date: March 5, 2002 16B 1 To: Keith Gomez, Senior Property Acquisition Specialist Transportation /Right of Way Department From: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Resolution 2002 - 112 /Deed Conveying Fee Simple Interest in Real Property to the State of Florida Department of Transportation for the Construction of Roadway Interchange Improvements to State Road 93 (I -75) at the Intersection of County Road 886 (Golden Gate Parkway) Please find enclosed a certified copy of the resolution and the original deed as referenced above, Agenda item #16B1, approved by the Board of County Commissioners on February 26, 2002. If you should have any questions, please call me at Ext. 7240. Thank you. Enclosure 168 1 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 112 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONVEYING A FEE SIMPLE INTEREST IN REAL PROPERTY TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF ROADWAY INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS TO STATE ROAD 93 (I -75) AT THE INTERSECTION OF COUNTY ROAD 886 (GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY). WHEREAS, the State of Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) is planning to construct a new interchange at the intersection of County Road 886 (Golden Gate Parkway) and Interstate I -75; and WHEREAS, the FDOT requires fee - simple interest in the lands described in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference (hereinafter referred to as the "Property "), for the construction of the proposed roadway interchange improvements, in accordance with the design plans of State Project Number 03175 -2430; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida (hereinafter referred to as the "Board "), is the fee owner of the Property; and WHEREAS, the FDOT has requested the Board convey the Property to the FDOT, at no cost, for the purpose of constructing roadway interchange improvements in accordance with State Project Number 03175 -2430; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 125.38, Florida Statutes, the Board is satisfied that such Property is necessary for such use, is not needed for county purposes and conveying the Property to the FDOT is in the best interest of the Public; and WHEREAS, the Board, as the fee owner, is willing to convey the Property to the FDOT, at no cost and for the stated purpose. Page 1 � 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that 1. The Property is necessary for the proposed roadway interchange improvements to be constructed by FDOT and not needed for County purposes. 2. The Board of County Commissioners agrees to convey the Property to the State of Florida Department of Transportation, at no cost. 3. The Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, is hereby authorized to execute the attached County Deed, and any documents attendant and necessary for the conveyance of this Property. THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED thisoeftday of , 2002, after motion, second and majority vote favoring its option. ATTBST:. MIGHT Er �3ROCK, CLERK <<��beputy Clerk Atii4' ' a0• tA`: NIr"lllall0t s#01dv�e: •tly. Approved for form and leg ufficiency ,&& L/ 4 Z' Ellen T. Chadwell Assistant County Attorney a Page 2 1 F.P. NO. 2007321 SECTION 03175 -2430 PARCEL 135 16s i "The South 17.5 feet of the North 67.5 feet of the East 150 feet of Tract 28, Unit 30, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 58, Public Records of Collier County, Florida," lying in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East. Being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the northeast corner of said Tract 28, said corner being on the survey base line of the Golden Gate Parkway (C.R. 886); thence along the east line of said Tract 28, South 00 055110" East a distance of 50.00 feet for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue along said east line South 00 055110" East a distance of 17.50 feet; thence South 89 005108" West a distance of 149.86 feet; thence North 00 055107" West a distance of 17.50 feet; thence North 89 °05108" East a distance of 149.86 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 2,623 square feet. Legal Descr'ption Approved by: 9d M. A. Ky r S. #4366 Date: 520 2oal NOT VALID L SS EM 0SSED B ExLJr A EXHIBIT "A" Page 3 I 03- BSD.03 Date: August 20, 2001 This instrument prepared under the direction of: Bruce P. Cury, General Counsel Post Office Box 1249 City: Bartow, Florida 33830 Department of Transportation COUNTY DEED F.P. NO. 2007321 PARCEL 135.1 SECTION 03175 -2430 STATE ROAD 93(I -75) COUNTY Collier i THIS DEED, made this ° —tk day of , 2009,, by COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, grantor, to the STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, grantee, whose post office address is: Post Office Box 1249, Bartow, Florida 33831 -1249. (Wherever used herein the terms "grantor" and "grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors, and assigns of organizations.) WITNESSETH: That the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $1.00 and other valuable considerations, receipt and sufficiency being hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confirms unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in Collier County, Florida, viz: SEE EXHIBIT "A" TOGETHER with all tenements, hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same, in fee simple forever. Page 1 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, said grantor has caused to be executed in its name by its Board of County acting ,bY,,, the Chairperson or Vice - Chairperson of day "en� iar aforesaid. ATTEST• a ( SEAL) . .� Clerk'(Qr': Deputy Clerk) 7asto fo R 1Pga1 sufficiency s'istant County Attorney =11en T. Chad all 168 1 these presents Commissioners said Board, the (I It. �_ � County, Florida, By Its Board of County Commissioners (SEAL) Nam 4" sOxi Its Chairperson (or Vice - Chairperson) Grantor(s)' Mailing Address: Collier Countv. Real Provert Department, 4th Floor Adminstration Building 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 Page 2 16B 1 F.P. NO. 2007321 SECTION 03175 -2430 PARCEL 135 "The South 17.5 feet of the North 67.5 feet of the East 150 feet of Tract 28, Unit 30, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 58, Public Records of Collier County, Florida," lying in Section 29, Township 49 South, Range 26 East. Being more particularly described as follows: Commence at the northeast corner of said Tract 28, said corner being on the survey base line of the Golden Gate Parkway (C.R. 886); thence along the east line of said Tract 28, South 00 055110" East a distance of 50.00 feet for a POINT OF BEGINNING; thence continue along said east line South 00 055110" East a distance of 17.50 feet; thence South 89 005108" West a distance of 149.86 feet; thence North 00 055107" West a distance of 17.50 feet; thence North 89 005108" East a distance of 149.86 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 2,623 square feet. Legal Descr'ption Approved by: /. -Z. 0 M. A. y� r 5.� ,4366 Date: NOT VALID ZVVESS EM OSSED EXHIBIT "A" Page 3 1 y I .r vt i i x N " I ...a I FI LU � I �.. S w o W �4 St 7 - 11y n w } 74 O 1pp� • , k -v O b ong gi$n $�o��aor�ca • "" w� wN ati I' I O" Y M M M Y Y pY Y Y Y Y Y "" Y wiBoti�Y;G� • � ; A RI 0 -16- �� MS 133N1S Ae9 N + +$ GIL la IN N Collier, FL .4 �1 r� 1 .1 1 ¢ o 13122 - --� - -- ------ ��' -aZ -- S79.40 _, r C 1 C 1 _ IE 4i 18.1 1 1' 1 1 I P, 1 ,,, I_ y ly 1 - -- - -- ---s - - - - - -- ------ - - -- ----------------- 61R. ------- = ' 1 -4 ------ ---- ------ ----- -80501 - --- ----- - -- ----- --- - -- - r 1 58o C27.2j X ° ti 33 Ian I 34 3 I • l 1 Sheet: 1 of 14.2 14 - 25 36.2 E5.1 ISO IA", lso laa S ��l t i 1>, 44.3 43 9 � CiiD 44.1 I L 61 1 1 49 � 1 1 GE) sa3 0 1 51E -------------------- -- --------------------- - - - - -- 1 ale _ 1 1 a 60.1 S ffi E W i i i 5a W 1 , O 1 1 " 1 1 1 1 1 r7 � 9 1 1 ' a8 � 1 1 56 1 1 r 1 ' Si 67.Z , 1 i 150 ISO ISO 1 ' 1 1 � 1 1 1 75 74 gas 1 , 1 1 � c 8L1 11 821 o W __ ------- __ W 1 , � 1 , � VP • 82 aE -- - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - -- ----------------------- - - - - -' ; -- - - - - -- - -- - - - - - - -- ----------------------- - - - - -- JEB BUSH GOVERNOR i� - Florida Department of Transportation Donation of Property to the Florida Department of Transportation Collier County, a political subdivision Attn.: Kevin Hendricks, Right of Way Supervisor Real Property Department 4th Floor, Administration Building 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 FORM 575- 030 -12 RIGHT OF WAY - 06199 1681 THOMAS F. BARRY, JR. SECRETARY ITEM /SEGMENT NO.: 2007321 MANAGING DISTRICT: One F.A.P. NO.: STATE ROAD NO COUNTY: PARCEL NO.: N/A 93 (1 -75) -___ Collier 135.1 INTEREST CONVEYED: Fee Si This is to advise that the undersigned, as owner of the property or property interest referenced above and as shown on Right of Way maps for referenced project, desires to make a voluntary donation of said property or property interest to the State of Florida for the use and benefit of the Florida Department of Transportation. The undersigned hereby acknowledges that he/she has been fully advised by a Department representative of his /her right to have the referenced property or property interest appraised, to accompany the appraiser during the appraisal inspection of the property, to receive full compensation for the above referenced property, and to receive reimbursement for reasonable fees and costs incurred, if any. Having been fully informed of the above rights, I hereby waive those rights unless otherwise noted below. p as totf�ora 1 i sufficiency V Assistant County Attorney Ellen T. Cfi&&ell Owner's Si ature James N Coletta, Chairman Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida Type or Print Property Owner's Name 1.13301 Bast Tamiami Trail Street Address Vnaples, Florida 34112 City, State, Zip Code Date www.dot.state.fl.us ® RECYCLED PAPER �r Attest: w .peal ) Clerk) er Atte '�' �[iiwaa = p as totf�ora 1 i sufficiency V Assistant County Attorney Ellen T. Cfi&&ell Owner's Si ature James N Coletta, Chairman Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida Type or Print Property Owner's Name 1.13301 Bast Tamiami Trail Street Address Vnaples, Florida 34112 City, State, Zip Code Date www.dot.state.fl.us ® RECYCLED PAPER Memorandum ��C•r` TO: Ellie Hoffman Records Technician III Minutes & Records Management FROM: Cindy Erb Sr. Property Acquisition Specialist Real Property Management Department DATE: March 11, 2002 RE: Wiggins Pass Road Outfall; Parcel #806 - Cook 16B 2 Please find attached one (1) original recorded Drainage Easement and one (1) original Donation Agreement for the above referenced project. The Board of County Commissioner of Collier County, Florida accepted the drainage easement from David L. and Lisa Darby Cook, Agenda Item 16 B (2), dated February 26, 2002. Please contact me if you have any questions or comments at 8917. Thank you. attachments as stated cc: Robert Wiley, Stormwater w /attachments Tax Appraiser's Office w /Easement only Inventory File w /attachments Office of the Real Property Management Department PROJECT: Wiggins Pass Road Outfall 16B 2 PARCEL #: 806 FOLIO #: 48075880000 DONATION AGREEMENT THIS DONATION AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement ") is made and entered into by and between DAVID L. COOK AND LISA DARBY COOK, husband and wife, (hereinafter referred to as "Owner "), whose mailing address is 702 Pan Am Avenue, Naples, FL 34110, and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, (hereinafter referred to as "County "), whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, County has requested that Owner convey to the County a perpetual, non- exclusive easement for the purpose of drainage and maintenance over, under, upon and across the lands described in Exhibit "A" (said easement hereinafter referred to as the "Property "), which is attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement; WHEREAS, Owner desires to convey the Property to County for the stated purposes, on the terms and conditions set forth herein; and WHEREAS, Owner recognizes the benefit to Owner and desires to convey the Property to the County for the stated purposes, on the terms and conditions set forth herein, said terms including that no compensation shall be due and payable for the Property requested by County; and NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises, the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby mutually acknowledged, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: 1. Owner shall convey the Property via an Easement to County at no cost to the County, unless otherwise stated herein. 2. Prior to Closing, Owner shall obtain from the holders of any liens, exceptions and /or qualifications encumbering the Property, the execution of such instruments which will remove, release or subordinate such encumbrances from the Property upon their recording in the public records of Collier County, Florida. Owner shall provide such instruments, properly executed, to County on or before the date of Closing. 3. This Agreement shall be null and void, and of no further force or effect, unless Closing shall occur within sixty (60) days from the date County executes this Agreement; provided; however, that County shall have the unilateral right to extend the term of this Agreement pending receipt of such instruments, properly executed, which either remove, release or subordinate any and all such liens, encumbrances or qualifications affecting County's enjoyment of the Property. 4. County shall restore the existing ground and landscaping to the same condition that existed prior to the construction. 5. Owner represents that the Property and all uses of the Property have been and presently are in compliance with all Federal, State and Local environmental laws; that no hazardous substances have been generated, stored, treated or transferred on the Property i 16B 2 except as specifically disclosed to the County; that the Owner has no knowledge of any spill or environmental law violation on any property contiguous to or in the vicinity of the Property to be conveyed to the County, that the Owner has not received notice and otherwise has no knowledge of a) any spill on the Property, b) any existing or threatened environmental lien against the Property or c) any lawsuit, proceeding or investigation regarding the generation, storage, treatment, spill or transfer of hazardous substances on the Property. This provision shall survive Closing and is not deemed satisfied by conveyance of title. 6. Owner shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless the County against and from, and to reimburse the County with respect to, any and all damages, claims, liabilities, laws, costs and expenses (including without limitation reasonable paralegal and attorney fees and expenses whether in court, out of court, in bankruptcy or administrative proceedings or on appeal), penalties or fines incurred by or asserted against the County by reason or arising out of the breach of Owner's representation under Section 5. This provision shall survive Closing and is not deemed satisfied by conveyance of title. 7. The County shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless the Owner against and from and to reimburse Owner with respect to, any, and all damages, claims, liabilities, laws, costs and expenses (including without limitation reasonable paralegal and attorney fees and expenses whether in court, out of court, in bankruptcy or administrative proceedings or on appeal), penalties or fines incurred by or asserted against the Owner by reason or arising out of the use of the Property by the County and the construction activities undertaken by the County. This provision shall survive Closing and is not deemed satisfied by the conveyance of title. 8. Use of the Property by the County is subject to the following terms and conditions, which are a material inducement for Owner granting the Easement for no consideration and entering into this Agreement: A. All construction activities undertaken by the County on the Property shall be completed within forty -five (45) days after commencement. As used herein "commencement" means the first physical alteration of the Property and "completed" means final installation of all drainage facilities and replacement of all landscaping, utilities and irrigation lines on the Property. For each day beyond the forty -five (45) that the County fails to timely complete, it shall pay owner a $100 per day penalty. B. No construction activities, except routine maintenance, shall occur between June 1 and November 1 of any year. C. The County shall restore the Property to its original condition which existed before commencement of any construction activities, including but not limited to, replacement of landscaping, grass, rip -rap, and all irrigation and utility lines. The County shall make a good faith effort to locate its drainage facilities in a manner which minimizes removal of native palm trees; however, if native palms must be removed, the County shall make every reasonable effort to remove such palms in a manner which enables them to be re- planted in their original location or proximate thereto. 9. The County shall pay for all costs of recording the conveyance instrument, and recording costs for any curative instruments, in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. County shall be responsible for paying any costs and /or fees associated with the securing and recording a Subordination, Consent & Joinder of Easement of the mortgage(s) recorded against the Property from the mortgagee(s). All other costs associated with this transaction including but not limited to transfer, documentary and intangible taxes shall be borne and paid by Owner. The cost of a title commitment shall be paid by County. 10. This Agreement and the terms and provisions hereof shall be effective as of the date this Agreement is executed by both parties and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, personal 16B 2 representatives, successors, successor trustees, and /or assignees, whenever the context so requires or admits. 11. Conveyance of the Property by Owner is contingent upon no other provisions, conditions, or premises other than those so stated above; and the written Agreement, including all exhibits attached hereto, shall constitute the entire Agreement and understanding of the parties, and there are no other prior or contemporaneous written or oral agreements, undertakings, promises, warranties, or covenants not contained herein. 12. If the Owner holds the Property in the form of a partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust or any form of representative capacity whatsoever for others, Owner shall make a written public disclosure, according to Chapter 286, Florida Statutes, under oath, of the name and address of every person having a beneficial interest in the Property before the Property held in such capacity is conveyed to County, its successors and assigns. (If the corporation is registered with the Federal Securities Exchange Commission or registered pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, whose stock is for sale to the general public, it is hereby exempt from the provisions of Chapter 286, Florida Statutes.) 13. This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. DATE ACQUISITION APPROVED BY BCC:�� /oar. AS TO COUNTY: DATED: - ,4-& , o� ATTEST:;; ` pSlC1.I.6,HT�E''�1�,ROCK, Clerk 1 ,Deputy Clerk AttNt as to Cha i ran ' s t:bitwe on l Y. AS TO OWNER: DATED: /� /S%��- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA .W N. CO .. LETTA, Chairman WITNESSES: Signature) DAVID L. COOK z -4v i 4i��n�t Na e) 00JO - 3 166 2 (Printed Name) WITNESSES: (Signature) J LISA DARBY COOK Lo c/i S zf (P ' ame (S'g ature) j-- V (Printed Name) Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: EI en T. Chadwell Assistant County Attorney ci C D 3 W �,D 0 ti D ---I m D r cn 0 L7 n W D -I D C O = td Z 0 m t1 L -i (7 C X mD pd < D �2:' -M C _ Z V) ;u m to C /n mN ZNO3 mC °m Z D m -9 Z D i 0 ;0 '--I � C m C m tzj O M :t7 rTl D C -1 m0 Zp Z —+ tj D D 0� =0 Z -i D p td E1 Z Z 3 ED C d N m C r ;u 7K r� n O m = C In D 0 m m a (4 C (n VENETIAN WAY (60' R.O.W.) ** *NOT A SURVEY * ** FOR' COLLIER CUUNT Y, FL DRIDA n DESIGNED BY.' DA TE' ASO PROJECT NO. ■■■■ xou DRAM Br. ML DAM APRIL 2 2001 7316 -2 ■ ■ ■■ Zl71E' WIGGINS OUTFACE BASIN �. : :� ER k CHECKED BY., A DALE: A 2001 SKETCH b ➢ESCRIPTION X00 RENSED SHEET NO. ...,.. DATE'OCTDBER 18, 2001 1 DF 1 OF DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ��'�' 1,gj —m sa SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 4B SOUTH, a '�"�' � a 7941 -SD RANGE 25 EAST 1.. "�°"" w' N" .... a �'°'„„ ( �� 5^ � ACRD Owc: FILE NO a..p '°�` u,. iw V PLOT NEW: e..m.......�..,,..„...- ,........ a w. ,.0 7942 PROJECT: Wiggins Pass Road Outfall PARCEL #: 806 FOLIO #: 48075880000 Prepared by: Ellen T. Chadwell, Esquire Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 ( 941) 774 -8400 2942009 OR: 2991 PG: 2939 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/04/2002 at 11:24AK DWIGHT B. BROCI, CLBRI RIC FBI 15.00 DOC -.70 .70 COPIES 3.00 Retn: REAL PROPERTY 16B BIT 8991 INTER OFFICE DRAINAGE EASEMENT THIS EASEMENT, made and entered into this 141 day of sigAJ 20 0.)-, by DAVID L. COOK AND LISA DARBY COOK, husband and wife, whose mailing address is 702 Pan Am Avenue, Naples, FL 34110, as Grantor, and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112, its successors and assigns, as Grantee. (Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns.) WITNESSETH: Grantor, for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys unto the Grantee, a perpetual, non - exclusive easement, license, and privilege to enter upon and to install and maintain underground drainage facilities on the following described lands located in Collier County, Florida, to wit: See attached Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein by reference. Subject to easements, restrictions, and reservations of record. THIS PROPERTY IS HOMESTEAD PROPERTY. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee together with the right to enter upon said land, place, excavate, and remove materials for the purpose of constructing, operating, and maintaining drainage facilities thereon. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. The easement granted herein shall constitute easements running with the land and shall burden the lands described above. Provided, however, the Grantee's use of the easement is subject to the terms of that certain unrecorded Donation Agreement between Grantor and Grantee executed simultaneously herewith. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. e�gz DAVID L. COOK Address: 702 Pan Am Avenue Naples, FL 34110 THIS CONVEYANCE ACCEPTED By THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO AGENDA, DATEDs x ITEM No. jig i Witness (Si n ture) n Name: 01-5e U1' ,n (Print or Type) Witness Si nature) Name: .f-- (Print or Type) STATE OF COUNTY OF �L L-e—e- OR: 2991 PG: 2940 16B 2 LISA DARBY COOK Address: 702 Pan Am Avenue Naples, FL 34110 The foregoing Drainage Easement was acknowledged before me this ftday of , 20o'-by David L. Cook, husband, who is personally known to mea (affix notarial seal) (Signature of N j Public) �pY• "� LouiseYeorwood (Print Name of Notary Public) MY COMMISSION # CC978486 EXPIRES a-' October 30, 2004 NOTARY PUBLIC BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE, INC. Serial /Commission #: My Commission Expires: io /so� STATE OF�� -- COUNTY OF L_.e e— The foregoing Drainage Easement was acknowledged before me this LI —day of , 2CQ -)by Lisa Darby Cook, wife, who is personally known to (affix notarial notarial seal) (Signature of N a Public) r Louise Yearwood MY COMMISSION# CC978486 EXPIRES (Print Name of Notary Public) -'' 2004 '0.= NOctober30, NOTARY PUBLIC Rf ii4 BONDED THRu TROY FAIN INSURANCE, INC Serial /Commission #: _ My Commission Expires: A as to form al sufficiency Assistant County Attorney Ellen T. Chadwell cf) C7 D 0 m 0n wD -1 D C O S tc1 Z 0 M t7 nC ,TJ Ml. m D O Gi £ D Z C m Z G A DATE: A 2001 H D SKETCH &DESCRIPTION G) C� '�� ZT m m ....._ _n. _ m Z D _CDC N 3 3 � � N m C ° m x p � D - Z 'l W ;u n �1 n m C) fl rpM(] I o m -� ;u d Z m Z M m t7 m D d m Z! -4 �7 mo Z 0 Z I -9 -0 -� tj 7 .% D n D 0� �Z N t7 O D W m Z d Z 3 m C ty D m 013 E3 � D m O m 9 n A =� p D 1] m� abdV) n o 700 f l ty Ln S O D S D Ln Z D r m � S � D N � O m n � r C L S00'S0'39'E 125.52 S00'50'39'E 144.26 O 4 1 w.v■ maw~ IN Vl OR: 2991 PG: 2941 16B 2 z m m IU A ri', 60' R.O.W. mIIV , VENETIAN WAY (60' R.O.W.) D Z ro D rs �-1, < z .� Z C m ** *NOT A SURVEY * ** FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA �� ' DESIGNED BY. DATE: ABB PROJECT NO. . ■.� GNOLI DRAW 8Y: : mmn Ml. DATE: AP IL 2 2001 7316 -2 nom' WIGGINS OUTFACE BASIN �� ER & CHECKED BY: G A DATE: A 2001 MO. SKETCH &DESCRIPTION uo. REVISED DATE:OCTOBER 18, 2001, OF DRAINAGE EASEMENTS RUNDAGR .n 1 DF 1 SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, Ps.fo d.-I -gim m pi� a ]sac anr. lfE: c.w. c-Ir w AM sae n.iw T." n.m n auw 1 ui ACAD OWC, 7941 -SD FlLE N0. RANGE 25 EAST = 1" a�a am.. Tel• it °r, w„c s... w... n wos i"�«- awe..a .r wa.eea� s.� u aw 5'0 PLOT VIEW: 7941 Memorandum 9 ,mini TO: Ellie Hoffman Records Technician III Minutes & Records Management FROM: DATE RE: Cindy Erb, Sr. Property Acquisition Specialist Real Property Management Department March 11, 2002 16B 3 Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project; Parcel No. III -840 Folio No. 00444560009 Please find attached one (1) original recorded Drainage Easement and one (1) original Easement Agreement for the above referenced project. The Board of County Commissioner of Collier County, Florida approved the acquisition pursuant to Agenda Item 16 B (3), dated February 26, 2002. Please contact me if you have any questions or comments at 774 -8917. Thank you. attachments as stated cc: Robert Wiley, PWED w /attachment Tax Appraiser w /Easement only Inventory File w /attachment Office of the Real Property Management Department PROJECT. Lely Area Stormwater Improvements 16B 3 PARCEL NO: III -840 FOLIO NO.: 00444560009 EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS EASEMENT AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement ") is made and entered into by and between WILLIE LOUISE SMITH GILLIARD AKA WILLIE LOUISE SMITH, an unmarried woman, (hereinafter referred to as "Owner "), whose mailing address is 2711 NW 21St Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33311 -3309, and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, its successors and assigns (hereinafter referred to as "Purchaser "), whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112; WHEREAS, Purchaser requires a perpetual, non - exclusive easement for drainage and maintenance, over, under, upon and across the lands described in Exhibit "A" (said easement hereinafter referred to as the "Property "), which is attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement; WHEREAS, Owner desires to convey the Property to Purchaser for the stated purposes, on the terms and conditions set forth herein; and WHEREAS, Purchaser has agreed to compensate Owner for conveyance of the Property; NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises, the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby mutually acknowledged, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: 1. Owner shall convey the Property to Purchaser for the sum of $800.00, payable by County Warrant (said transaction hereinafter referred to as the "Closing "). Said payment shall be full compensation for the Property conveyed, including all landscaping, trees, shrubs, improvements, and fixtures located thereon, and for any damages resulting to Owner's remaining lands, and for all other damages in connection with conveyance of said Property to Purchaser. 2. Prior to Closing, Owner shall obtain from the holders of any liens, exceptions and /or qualifications encumbering the Property, the execution of such instruments which will remove, release or subordinate such encumbrances from the Property upon their recording in the public records of Collier County, Florida. Owner shall provide such instruments, properly executed, to Purchaser on or before the date of Closing. 3. This Agreement shall be null and void, and of no further force or effect, unless Closing shall occur within sixty (60) days from the date Purchaser executes this Agreement; provided; however, that Purchaser shall have the unilateral right to extend the term of this Agreement pending receipt of such instruments, properly executed, which- either remove, release or subordinate any and all such liens, encumbrances or qualifications affecting Purchaser's enjoyment of the Property. At Closing, Purchaser shall deliver the County Warrant to Owner and Owner shall deliver the conveyance instrument to Purchaser in a form acceptable to Purchaser. 4. Owner is aware and understands that the "offer" to purchase represented by this Agreement is subject to acceptance and approval by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. Easement Agreement 168 3 Page 2 5. Owner represents that the Property and all uses of the Property have been and presently are in compliance with all Federal, State and Local environmental laws; that no hazardous substances have been generated, stored, treated or transferred on the Property except as specifically disclosed to the Purchaser; that the Owner has no knowledge of any spill or environmental law violation on any property contiguous to or in the vicinity of the Property to be sold to the Purchaser, that the Owner has not received notice and otherwise has no knowledge of a) any spill on the Property, b) any existing or threatened environmental lien against the Property or c) any lawsuit, proceeding or investigation regarding the generation, storage, treatment, spill or transfer of hazardous substances on the Property. This provision shall survive Closing and is not deemed satisfied by conveyance of title. 6. Owner shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless the Purchaser against and from, and to reimburse the Purchaser with respect to, any and all damages, claims, liabilities, laws, costs and expenses (including without limitation reasonable paralegal and attorney fees and expenses whether in court, out of court, in bankruptcy or administrative proceedings or on appeal), penalties or fines incurred by or asserted against the Purchaser by reason or arising out of the breach of Owner's representation under Section 5. This provision shall survive Closing and is not deemed satisfied by conveyance of title. 7. The Purchaser shall pay for all costs of recording the conveyance instrument in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. All other costs associated with this transaction including but not limited to transfer, documentary and intangible taxes, and recording costs for any curative instruments shall be borne and paid by Owner. Owner shall be responsible for paying any costs and /or fees associated with the securing and recording a Subordination, Consent & Joinder of Easement of the mortgage(s) recorded against the Property from the mortgagee(s). The cost of a title commitment shall be paid by Purchaser. 8. This Agreement and the terms and provisions hereof shall be effective as of the date this Agreement is executed by both parties and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors, successor trustees, and /or assignees, whenever the context so requires or admits. 9. Conveyance of the Property by Owner is contingent upon no other provisions, conditions, or premises other than those so stated above; and the written Agreement, including all exhibits attached hereto, shall constitute the entire Agreement and understanding of the parties, and there are no other prior or contemporaneous written or oral agreements, undertakings, promises, warranties, or covenants not contained herein. 10. If the Owner holds the Property in the form of a partnership, limited partnership, corporation, trust or any form of representative capacity whatsoever for others, Owner shall make a written public disclosure, according to Chapter 286, Florida Statutes, under oath, of the name and address of every person having a beneficial interest in the Property before the Property held in such capacity is conveyed to Purchaser, its successors and assigns. (If the corporation is registered with the Federal Securities Exchange Commission or registered pursuant to Chapter 517, Florida Statutes, whose stock is for saie to the general public, it is hereby exempt from the provisions of Chapter 286, Florida Statutes.) 11. This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. Easement Agreement 16B 3 Page 3 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on this 9,9 day of , 2002. Date Property acquisition approved by BCC: AS TO PURCHASER: DATED :- � zip 2-OOV ATTEST:,,, DVV!ORT'UBROCK, Clerk Deputy Clerk Attest' ii "'to Chainwt's sigsetvr* fall. AS TO SELLER: DATED:__ u WITNESSES: u _L14 4� Witness Signat re Name: I - (Print or Type) - Witness (Signature J Name: MOlI.Qurr (Print 6r Type) Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: I ;'J" �Jllil, — Ellen T. Chadwell Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA WILLIE LOUISE SMITH GILLIARD AKA WILLIE LOUISE SMITH PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENFiie " + 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 3,11-12 (941) 774 -8192 6 B 3 P.O.C. W 1/4 COR. SEC. 32, TWP. 50 S, RGE 26 E. — on N O N M 0 N O Lc SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION NOT A SURVEY .144 Wp a a s (P o PARCEL -M840 TAX PARCEL 84 / NygoS'l s C LEGAL DESCRIPTION rMai PROJECT .._... ji 10! PARCEL --IZ2-- ^ f'fo FOLIO 0044.13'6-6009 -. THE SOUTHEASTERLY 60 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: COMMENCE AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S 02 °50'30" W ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 32 206.29 FEET; THENCE N 59 °57'30" E 1942.44 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE CONTINUE N 59 °57'30" E 150.00 FEET; THENCE N 30°02'30" W 300.00 FEET; THENCE S 59 057'30" W 150.00 FEET, THENCE S 30002'30" E 300.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. GENERAL NOTES 1) P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 2) P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING 3) SEC. = SECTION 4) TWP. = TOWNSHIP 5) RGE. = RANGE 6) R/W = RIGHT OF WAY 7) ALL DISTANCES ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF 8) NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED AND SEALED WITH THE EMBOSSED SEAL OF A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR NOT TO SCALE JPREI REDBY_–� E -- R. RICHMOND P.L.S. 2406 COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 3301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 DATE r FI NO. JUNE 14, 2000 I GWT840 j SHEET 1 OF 1 PROJECT: Lely Area Stormwater Improvements PARCEL NO: III -840 FOLIO NO.: 00444560009 Prepared by: Ellen T. Chadwell, Esquire Office of the County Attor"Y 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 ( 941) 174 -8400 2942000 OR: 2991 PG: 2900 RECORDID in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIIR COUNTY, FL 03/04/2002 at 11:20AN DWIGHT B. BROCL, CLIRI CONS 800.00 RIC FBB 15.00 DOC -.10 5.60 COPIBS 3.00 Retn: BITL8991PBRlY 168 3 INlIR OFFICE DRAINAGE EASEMENT THIS EASEMENT, made and entered into this �_q day of , 2002, by WILLIE LOUISE SMITH GILLIARD AKA WILLIE LOU SE SMI19H, an unmarried woman, whose mailing address is 2711 NW 21s' Street, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33311 -3309, as Grantor, and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, whose mailing address is 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112, its successors and assigns, as Grantee. (Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties to this instrument and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns.) WITNESSETH: Grantor, for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the Grantee, a perpetual, non - exclusive easement, license, and privilege to enter upon and to install and maintain drainage and utility facilities on the following described lands located in Collier County, Florida, to wit: See attached Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein by reference. Subject to easements, restrictions, and reservations of record. THIS IS NOT HOMESTEAD PROPERTY. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee together with the right to enter upon said land, place, excavate, and remove materials for the purpose of constructing, operating, and maintaining drainage and utility facilities thereon. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. The easement granted herein shall constitute easements running with the land and shall burden the lands described above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed the date and year first above written. Witness (Signature) Name: 8, t ,Ati� M11tIX Willie Louise Smith Gilliard (Print or Type) aka Willie Louise Smith U , Z� Witness ignat,ure) - Name: i�U . (Print o`r Type) Address: 2711 NW 21 st Street Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33311 -3309 THIS CONVEYANCE ACCEPTED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO AGENDA, DATED: oz ITEM NO. �✓ STATE OF c —rc111 COUNTY OF vc �' Tel e foregoing Drainage Easement was acknowledged of -Li -W ,� , 2002 by Willie Louise Smith Smith, an unmar ied woman, who is personally known to '42Q _ as identification. (affix notarial sea[) F 1 I: AL BETTY NOTARYI'Lio7.iC Sfi :r . > rl.ORIDA COMMISSION NO.:1045+663 MY COMMISSION EXE AIr.28,2005 Appro d as to form >!, al sufficirKy Assistant County Attorney Ellen T. ChadW011 OR: 2991 PG: 2901 166 3 before me this day Gilliard, aka Willie Louise me or who has produced (Signatu e of Notary Public) S (Print N me of Notary Publi NOTARY PUBLIC Serial /Commission #: My Commission Expires: `N yl 01 PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT of 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 16B (941) 774 -8192 fps 9QQ1 AG• 7QAl SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION NOT A SURVEY P.O.C. W 1/4 COR. o SEC. 32, TWP. 50 S, o RGE 26 E. o) N 8 0 N ° N 3�� E cn 59 0 Aa LEGAL DE-SCRIPTION bx 144 2 `''o 0 a wp PARCEL -M840 TAX PARCEL 84 i LOON s.. Ny9,y -�3 .O.B. PROJECT -1 / d ! --- PARCEL FOLIO 004112 -r 0009 -, THE SOUTHEASTERLY 60 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: COMMENCE AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S 02 °50'30" W ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 32 206.29 FEET; THENCE N 59 °57'30" E 1942.44 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: THENCE CONTINUE N 59 057'30" E 150.00 FEET; THENCE N 30 °02'30" W 300.00 FEET; THENCE S 59 057'30" W 150.00 FEET, THENCE S 30 °02'30" E 300.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. GENERAL NOTES 1) P.O.C. = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT 2) P.O.B. = POINT OF BEGINNING 3) SEC. = SECTION 4) TWP. = TOWNSHIP 5) RGE. = RANGE 6) RNV = RIGHT OF WAY 7) ALL DISTANCES ARE IN FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF 8) NOT VALID UNLESS SIGNED AND SEALED WITH THE EMBOSSED SEAL OF A PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR PREP RED BY: -- - _ - -�--1 -- - --- - -- EORGE R. RICHMOND P.L.S. 2406 COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS 3301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 NOT TO SCALE I JUNE 14, 2000 I GWT840 I SHEET 1 OF 1 Project 60018 S/A No. 1 IMMOKALEE ROAD DESIGN PROJECT 160 AMENDMENT NO. 1 TO PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT C.R. 951 TO 43rd AVENUE This Amendment No. 1 to the Agreement (hereinafter referred to as the "AGREEMENT ") is made and entered into this 9,`aL day of , 2002, by and between the Board of County Commissioners for Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as the "COUNTY ") and CH2M Hill, authorized to do business in the State of Florida, whose business address is 4350 West Cypress Street, Tampa, Florida 33607 -4178 (hereinafter referred to as the 4L "CONSULTANT "). WITNESSETH WHEREAS, COUNTY and CONSULTANT currently have a valid Professional Services Agreement for the provision of professional services for Immokalee Road (C.R. 951 to 43rd Avenue) the COUNTY desires to modify the terms of said AGREEMENT, and towards that end it is necessary to provide additional general Construction Engineering Re- design Services to eliminate the lighting system, sidewalk and bike paths from C.R. 951 to Wilson Boulevard and the design of force main and water main utilities, said services more fully described in said Amendments thereto; and WHEREAS, COUNTY and CONSULTANT agree the addition for Immokalee Road (C.R. 951 to 43rd Avenue) General Construction Engineering Re- design Services to eliminate the lighting system, sidewalk and bike paths from C.R. 951 to Wilson Boulevard and the design of force main and water main utilities. Re- design of the road plans and design of utilities are related to the extension of the Construction Contract to the services being contemplated under said AGREEMENT are necessary; and Page I of 3 16B Project 60018 S/A No. 1 WHEREAS, CONSULTANT represents that he has the expertise and the type of professional services that will be required for completion of the project. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and provisions contained herein, parties agree as follows: ARTICLE ONE 1. CONSULTANT shall provide to COUNTY Professional Engineering Services in accordance with Attachment "A" of this Amendment; as attached hereto. 2. COUNTY agrees to compensate CONSULTANT for services rendered hereunder as prescribed in "Man -Hour & Cost Summary ", as outlined in said AGREEMENT. Contract fee adjustments: 2.1 Original maximum contract fee = $ 2,352,928.00 2.2 S/A No. 1 = $ 230,444.00 Current Contract Fee = $ 2,583,372.00 3. The schedule for said PROJECT for Professional Engineering Services for Immokalee Road General Construction Engineering Road Re- design and Utilities Design Services are related to the extension of the Construction Contract, shall be completed in one hundred eighty (180) calendar days. New final completion date will be May 3, 2002. Page 2 of 3 Project 60018 S/A No. 1 4. The AGREEMENT, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Amendment to Professional Services Agreement for the Immokalee Road Project #60018 the day and year first written above. ATTEST: (As to Chairperson) By: Dv4ght E. Brock, Clerk Atttat 'is 0 Chairma's siywat Ml�. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Assistant ounty Attorney itness Witness BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA 4 �.►./i .I ,i/. By: z � E�I� -r9i CH2M Hill By: John ogge ice- President Transportation Page 3 of 3 (CORPORATE SEAL) ATTACHMENT A SCOPE OF SERVICES We" SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT TO CONSULTING ENGINEERING SERVICES AGREEMENT Mon IMMOKALEE ROAD C.R. 846 [C.R. 951 TO 43an AVE. NE] PROJECT NO. 60018 Supplemental Agreement No. 1 January 9, 2002 DESCRIPTION 168 4 Supplemental Agreement No.l provides for the Consultant's services to be expanded to include revising the previously submitted 90% plans package to reflect typical section changes, lighting modifications, and for providing the design, plans, specifications, and estimates for a proposed 36 -inch water -main and proposed 16 -inch force main within the project corridor. PART 1. — SCOPE OF WORK TASK I. The CONSULTANT will provide additional engineering services during the final design phases for revising all the pertinent 90 % Construction Plans to reflect the typical section modifications. These changes will require geometric changes and corresponding revisions to the typical section sheets, plan/profile sheets, drainage plans, cross sections, MOT plans, signing & pavement marking plans, signal plans, lighting plans, quantities, and cost estimates to reflect typical section and lighting modifications. This task includes deletion of the sidewalk, bicycle lanes, and lighting from the west end of the project to Wilson Boulevard. This typical section modification will require revising the outside lane widths to 14 feet, modification of the median width by 4 feet, and deleting the 1 -foot of pavement in place for future six lane widening through out the project. This task includes all engineering calculations, design analysis, and revisions required for the preparation of construction plans. This task also includes the design and preparation of plans, specifications, and estimates for providing lighting at the Collier and Wilson Boulevard intersections. Immok_suppl_ 1 Final_010902 1/10/2002 Attachment A 16 B Immokalee Road Supplemental Agreement No. 1 Page 2 January 9, 2002 TASK II The CONSULTANT with provide engineering services for the design, preparation of construction plans, cost estimates, and specifications for a proposed 36 -inch water -main from C.R. 951 to 43rd Ave. This task includes route evaluation, design, the resolution of utility and drainage conflicts, coordination, quantities, utility bridge design (if required), and services during construction for periodic field reviews and responding to requests for information. These plans will be included with the 100% Roadway plans package. TASK III The CONSULTANT with provide engineering services for the design, preparation of construction plans, cost estimates, and specifications for a proposed 16 -inch force -main from C.R. 951 to Oil Well Road. This task includes route evaluation, design, the resolution of utility and drainage conflicts, coordination, quantities, and services during construction for periodic field reviews and responding to requests for information. These plans will be included with the 100% Roadway plans package. Basic Services for Task's II and III include: • Evaluate and consider a parallel pipeline design for the 36" Water Main to minimize water quality issues. • Evaluate the best corridor and pipeline alignment for both facilities (36" Water Main, or 2 Equivalent Water Mains, and 16" Force Main). • Provide detailed design with plan and profile views on separate Utility Drawing Sheets per Collier County standards. • Prepare project specific conditions for incorporation into the specifications, if necessary. • Prepare specifications and a bid proposal package per Collier County standards. • Coordinate with developers to identify possible crossings locations where applicable. • Provide utility coordination and conflict resolution during design. • Coordinate with drainage design and minimize conflicts making changes to drainage when necessary. • Provide estimated Quantities and a Construction Cost Estimate with 100% Plans. • Attend/participate in Pre - Application Meeting. • Complete and provide Long Form Permit- Application for Water Main Construction. Permit Fee to be paid by Collier County. • Complete and provide permit application for force main construction. • Attend/participate in Pre -Bid Meeting. • Provide responses to Bidders questions • Provide recommendation for contract award. • Attend/participate in Pre - Construction Meeting. CADOCUME -1 \thorpe_1\LOCALS-1 \Temp \Immok_suppl_1 Final _010902.doc 1/10/2002 Attachment A 16B � Immokalee Road Supplemental Agreement No. 1 Page 3 January 9, 2002 • Participate in periodic Field Visits (4 total) during Utility Construction • Review Shop Drawings • Respond to Requests for Clarification and provide addendum's if necessary. • Complete Certificates of Completion with Partial Clearances of the Water Main as applicable.( *) • Complete Certificate of Completion for Force Main Construction. ( *) • Provide record drawings if contractor and/or the firm providing complete services during construction provides certified as -built drawings. ( *) - NOTE: Clearance Certifications are contingent on CH2M HILL receiving advance notification and witnessing pressure tests, and other tests if necessary, as part of our periodic field reviews. PART 2. — PROJECT SCHEDULE: The project design schedule for design services shall be modified as follows: 1. Tasks to be included with the lmmokalee Road 100% Plans submittal. 2. 100% Plans due April 19, 2002 Final Plans due May 3, 2002 PART 3. — EXCLUSIONS: The following tasks are not included in the Scope of Work for this Supplement: Services other than those specifically listed above. 2. Services requiring more effort than that listed in the Fee Schedule. 3. Permit Fees C: \DOCUME -1 \thorpe_1\LOCALS- 1 \Temp\lmmok_suppl_ l Final_010902.doc 1/10/2002 1 A 4 0 Y E rn O_ OI C yl O E E ',. ED m (0 III ID y y O '.. C a o y O E v c o O E 0 o - 0 o y', ° c 2 E c t ° � 'y °'' c 7 ° j O y O N N C 4'S y C y O> O N C NI hI C O U 0) y III y C ` N L .O_yF C' O y 0 O C 0 -O N aC I y ''I '.. .0 V C 'y O �` w0 d `� 07 C a 06I N N C Ny N N y (D �'� y m N y N y c °� ° m E ci ° c (0 y f0 c .o m Q O c n y (0 c U Vl c .o N m . E y LO _°__L° d P 2 N m N m o 3 3 m m n 3 3 m LL c N N y 0. O y y C y 0 _N C 0 U O y y .O y C C 0 0 .O U a O GI C) L r o O) N m O N d L O m N L (0 N N �i c L L N N d L N c L m N° C vvvgg 0 C N N C o � O '0 C C 2"2 y , o y O L y N > y d' O O y y h 7 y L M N y N (0 dj y d y y O O O O Q O 0 y d O'j y m N u y N N O 0 0 6 >> y N rN w v �vvNNN mo:m000.d m�mc>oaa to O O n O O O O M 0 0 M � O ^ ? N O Of (M O �O ( 0 M T O O ? yy W M O p n N W OO O) eV D t• M O U to to M N 6% 0 N (O O ry tR O) M to w M V ^ W to Oj o N O M 1O to tH � g A M N N 6.) R N O to o n O o to m O EA m M O FA N N MO to ONO n ? N LO N (O to 2 11 M to tri to to fo to t0 O) 00') O .- N N O O cO V O d' (C.03 V N O N V O .0 O V] 01 N 7 a0 N N O a0 N c0 '.. N m'.� O CO C eO O (O O NNN O 7 fO O= N N M N �Cl) w ~ Of z O O O O O O O'I,O O O O O OI,O O OO O OHO a0 O O O N 0 0 O Oa O O �. CD N O N (O,O OO O O'.7 a0 U N ' i LL = !� U W O O O O V 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O 01-0 aO a0 O O N Ql M N V V OO O O O O O O � I l W f 0Oa W O',O V 0 0 0 0 v V O O N N O N O O O!O N 00 8 tO N O V co O O N !to W CO CID N O Q I I I N (D O a m I O co r I IO zo Ji E ! O 00 �jOIm � N W �,O N N N co cO O O N Im O O- I w wow 7 0:I.O 0 z N I I,.V (D V W w a 1 O El Q 2 — U 1-- G +�' Q w O OHIO OIO'O O N O O O O OBI V,O O a 7...N N O V' OD IIiiN N N 7 (O O 0 O a M N 0 N M a0 O O. Of a � fA ow w w i o o'.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 oo ole o 0 'o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0'0 0 0 0 0 0 'o 0 0 0 oro'o 0 0 0 0 U) I I I c I rn d Q a 2! cn N E c 4) Y O G o C N N o Y Q C O C Io u Nin ) yC', (°o d 000'I LIIc a o0o a; 2 CL E N °? d c �� y a li y'A c CL E'I c E _ J c° a L° 5 y' A o X. E c ='A J. z 8 a N m o m E y c c 4% U c A y y 0 CL y C 'C 0 m N O In N y T d l0 L O d N _n Q� y l > O l9l a W y �. y y OI d J R= �J "' U. a C C nl O d d a� W E d cn .8 J O Ol A S c J N d LL a O O y� `� dj W_ y E I d Q. .d. 07 w 0 t O w O O � K J 2 0) m n C(/JO O E .. d C y c C l0 O OaU (D R N A 2 d € a C- y y y 0 19 O OU C O C O N� 9 A O Ea 7 C N O C y l 0 (0 c � E a° Z d w v o 0 o y C a�'i o 9 Clp m R a a�i N H V F :: m> N �U d o m 0 d F V (i F m> d o d O_U 0 a�i N❑ N t� (00 tb O E O T1 E C O l0 N 7�UQ O U O)N c', U r a� W 2U �. 1O'C m N N N N U N O W Z U O N L fO !E ... m d !4 U 0) c U > TIC S 'O. E N E .� C., C m c 0 O O y E - f6 c c O) '.c-. C L 03 2 7 '�. E a N N A A y R N y 5 to 01 O ._ 'N : '- N N i.+ n (,t W (O n O U Q y N N N Z O A R ul A N LL N 10 IO O G N- �° N N O n n O U p Z I,. U N MYI'Ic�O1- U)u)aa o',OI,(OL) in0) -1 aa� ',�� I (�m�o�oco(ndva_(n 1-1-H t- �mw0 :Docncnoo,a(n N M C' (O (O 1- a0 Ol O I, �''. N M a �O'. (O f� 00 W N N N 1 i N - N M * (O � (O (- O0 W O .- M � N M I � In (O 1� (O O> O r- Y Y y ! Y N ! 0 Y E rn O_ OI C yl O E E I r I I L z W � O I v i I I I I I OF O'0 ''tl�9 dM9 � N I N N O = LO N Z F- N N C.) U) II 2 w w W � F S D O fD J II N m a 0 Q Z W I d E ~ LU c d w w a I', E a o EQ a Q Ow II N � o of N ^ ICI W Ix f' z d 71' W y o SI Z FZ - W W J cas � aKO �° F o� d g J F a ate i w° Q Jy = O p , o j ~O�N m J a li Ow N d U F V! F~ E E H HRH I I 168 4 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST For Budget/Finance Use Only BA# ............................... JE# .. ............................... BAR # ................I........I.... A.P.H. Date ....................... 166 4 FUND TITLE Sewer Impact Fee FUND NO. 414 Date prepared: 1/28/02 Approved by BCC on Attach Executive Summary Item No. Combined Sewer I Cost Center Title I EXPENSE BUDGET DETAIL 263611 Immokalee Road 1173131 Cost Center No. East 16" Forcemain I I Proje4 I Project Title No. Expenditure Object Code Expenditure Title Increase (Decrease) Current Budget Revised Budget 631400 Engineering Fees $64,973 -0- $64,973 649010 Licenses & Permits $500 -0- $500 Budget 993000 Reserves for Capital Outlay ($65,473) $917,984 $852,511 TOTAL $65,473 Reserves Cost Center Title 919010 Cost Center No. Project Title Project No. Expenditure Expenditure Increase Current Revised Object Code Title (Decrease) Budget Budget 993000 Reserves for Capital Outlay ($65,473) $917,984 $852,511 TOTAL $65,473 166 4 REVENUE BUDGET DETAIL I Cost Center Title I Cost Center No. I Project Title I Project No. Revenue Object Code Revenue Title Increase (Decrease) Current Budget Revised Budget Budget Department: Agency Manager: Finance Department: Clerk of Board Admin.: Input by: B.A. No.: TOTAL EXPLANATION Why are funds needed? To provide sufficient funds for obtaining professional engineering services associated with the design, permitting and construction of a 16" force main along Immokalee Road from C.R. 951 to 43rd Ave. N.E. This growth- related project was not anticipated when the FY 2002 budget was prepared because it is a new project recommended in the Master Plan as adopted by the BCC on December 11, 2001. Where are funds available? In the Reserves of Fund 413. REVIEW PROCESS Cost Center Director: DATE z _ Division Administrator: Budget Department: Agency Manager: Finance Department: Clerk of Board Admin.: Input by: B.A. No.: BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST For Budget/Finance Use Only BA# ............................... JE# .. ............................... BAR # .............................. A.P.H. Date ....................... 16B �+ FUND TITLE Water Impact Fee FUND NO. 411 Date prepared: 1/28/02 Approved by BCC on Attach Executive Summary Item No. Combined Water Capital Projects Cost Center Title EXPENSE BUDGET DETAIL 273511 Cost Center No. Immokalee Road East WTM Project Title 70093 No. Expenditure Object Code Expenditure Title Increase (Decrease) Current Budget Revised Budget 631400 Engineering Fees $85,457 -0- $85,457 649010 Licenses & Permits $500 -0- $500 Budget 993020 Reserve for Water Capital Outlay ($85,957) $618,167 $532,210 _ TOTAL $35,957 Reserves Cost Center Title 919010 I I Cost Center No. Project Title Project No. Expenditure Expenditure Increase Current Revised Object Code Title (Decrease) Budget Budget 993020 Reserve for Water Capital Outlay ($85,957) $618,167 $532,210 _ TOTAL ($85,957) 16B 4 f REVENUE BUDGET DETAIL I Cost Center Title Cost Center No. Project Title Project No. Revenue Object Code Revenue Title Increase (Decrease) Current Budget Revised Budget Budget Department: Agency Manager: Finance Department: Clerk of Board Admin.: Input by: R.A. No.. TOTAL EXPLANATION Why are funds needed? To provide sufficient funds for obtaining professional engineering services associated with the design, permitting and construction of a 36" water main along Immokalee Road from C.R. 951 to 43rd Ave. N.E. This growth - related project was not anticipated when the FY 2002 budget was prepared because it is a new project recommended in the Master Plan as adopted by the BCC on December 11, 2001. Where are funds available? In the Reserves of Fund 411. REVIEW PROCESS Cost Center Director: !>U `1 G—`- --- DATE �� `� Division Administrator: Budget Department: Agency Manager: Finance Department: Clerk of Board Admin.: Input by: R.A. No.. 16B 6 10 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 1, 2002 ime0 AGREEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF ACCESS IMPROVEMENTS THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this,?. day of,-/�by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, (hereinafter referred to as "County "), and REGENCY REALTY GROUP, INC., a Florida corporation, its successors and assigns (hereinafter referred to as "Developer "). WHEREAS, the County is presently constructing a portion of Immokalee Road, CR 846 Highway designated as County's Project No. 69101, Immokalee Road 4- Laning Improvements commencing from I -75 extending easterly to Collier Boulevard (hereinafter referred to as "Highway "); and WHEREAS, the Developer is the owner of the property known as Pebblebrooke Plaza according to the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 36, pages 3 and 4 of the public records of Collier County, Florida (hereinafter "Developer's Property "); and WHEREAS, the Developer has proposed that the County design and construct turn lanes and turn outs to the Developer's Property located at the southwest corner of Immokalee Road and Collier Boulevard as depicted on the site plan attached hereto as Exhibit "A" (hereinafter "Access Facilities "); and WHEREAS, the Developer is responsible for the design and construction of said access facilities; and WHEREAS, the Developer has agreed to cdmpensate the County for the design and construction of the Access Facilities. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the promises and mutual covenants hereinafter contained and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby mutually acknowledged, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: 1. The County has or shall construct the Access Facilities pursuant to the plan and profile sheets 32R and 36R of the Immokalee Road Construction Plans dated December 1998. 2. The Developer shall pay to the County pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, the actual costs incurred by the County for the design and construction of the Access Facilities. The parties agree that the actual construction costs equal Forty -Eight Thousand Seven Hundred Sixteen and 32/100 Dollars ($48,716.32). Payment by Developer shall be made within thirty (30) days of the full execution of this Agreement by mailing or delivering a check to Lynn Thorpe, Senior Project Manager, 2675 South Horseshoe Drive, Suite 401, Naples, Florida 34104. 3. The County reserves the right to make access modifications within its existing or future road right -of -way pursuant to its police power. 4. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of Florida. In the event any litigation is instituted by way of construction or enforcement of this Agreement, the prevailing party in said litigation shall be entitled to collect and recover from the opposite party all court costs and other expenses including reasonable attorney's fees. 5. This Agreement contains the entire understanding between the parties and any modifications to this Agreement shall be reduced to writing and signed by the parties hereto. 6. Except as this Agreement may otherwise be terminated, this Agreement shall remain in full force and effect from the date first written above and shall terminate upon the completion of the services and responsibilities performed by the County and the Developer to each other's reasonable satisfaction which shall be evidenced in writing. MEW 7. The County or Developer may terminate this Agreement with reasonable cause prior to the completion of the Access Facilities upon thirty (30) days prior written notice to each other as provided in this Agreement. In the event of such termination by either party, the County shall be entitled to compensation for value of services provided, construction performed and termination costs as actually incurred. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their appropriate officials as of the date first written above. AS TO THE COUNTY: DATED: ,..es xG .Zoo X, TT , T: - .DWIG& E. BROCK, Clerk rA, ,,Atte st :apt' io Cha 1► pan M �y. AS TO THE DEVELOPER: signature Printed /Typed acne Signature ft I' l.C;'fIU.U�_/�_ Printed/Typed Name Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Heidi F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney h: HFA\ Agreements- ImmokaleeRd- Regency RealtyGroup BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: X;_-ea JAM N. COLETTA, Chairman REGENCY REALTY GROUP, INC. KA y - P. ' {O"j sgvv Printed /Typed Title (corporate seal) A) z Z I �I U z LO o� rnl O g r N u iII o III I 10d 13 96'91,+1, l V1S 1 l i l I I I I 1111I � IJf 1 IIII` I I II '1H5 110 'NI 0 I 0 l 15 +£6 I II M0138 n0 ddb 18 L I I II 11 I IIwo I +961 diS '1HH ' 10 0 0 io I �) I I I 1'26' -J I 0 I m 1 w � I I N N li I I I ! I I I i � I I if y II < a II I II I I I I I I 1 liI I OO +t,g L y1S i 3NII H ,01V N Z0 I II w I I mo No I _ ' >I 10 I 'I �O1,o0 4 y L I I ' ^ s U) .t5bi ri w >y m 4o wa.a maiGi u Z =, <a° I 10d 83 'v a If I I I r I I IS'wa.d -j p m m ° +ri ui uj o_ n +a 1 + o I <r°oomv ^+no�mcom i I I a9 <za �OUy OONp 1 NIa -la- will IL II II II ntntn I .II + � mo--1 �waa w I I I C I I +� to ' I h z I�1 co m 1 � IF II Y. i Im U I +cd I I I i I II I I II I r M/a -1VNV .001 I 1 SIB 10d 8 98'S1, +6B VI 0 I I If ' I I I 1HS '1.0 'NIV 00 69 t 'Y MOlea 0 dyad O r j I I cr I I I Z I I 0 I II w I N I LO I ! II r I II l III m 1! I I 11� I l I I II j < C wo m i 2i I Ix I ! II I w II I I I N I I I I w a. N IIII I I II !I Ir I I x I I '1HS 110 'NIV21 I I I II I I I I 1 I I I I O +S9t 'Yl I N w I Mole 3AO dYHd � I I I I I Z 0 l I Y wa lY ip I I OO +t,g L y1S i 3NII H ,01V N c I mo No I 0 oo W, , a ' v1 to + I 'I �O1,o0 4 y L Z o� N to r: r. C04, <,4 ' ^ s OCNVN I -U II II 11 II II II �y .t5bi ri w >y m 4o wa.a maiGi I U I I I 10d 83 I OZ' S +1,6t V1S Od I I I I I I I r I I IS'wa.d U�QU ZjR 0 C3w ¢tn Li Zz H X IL W W ZZpaIro to Y �O3 coiw ?�'S�tn m wtoZ= FD J m W F c� pm UIL Jt{ F a- W tYUaF1 V; ?oF Ro wZ j,: p(z� z p� ��6w( $ao aaw� 00�� _?_ _ I Y V I N m � 17 Ld W � Z_ N * $ I v R I a I xT. I � ot lY Q I1 W lot M En Y W 0 O ce m W IL a I II X Fr PC I LL N N N II O I F + I II I 3NIl H01dIN a�5Pn A ma$� O N L 00 CO 't CV O I i 0) t- Do I o 61,'Gl ii 0 9t rn V K j OW o LO O < - ..........._..._.._........... j 1 ....._. ^aN Q < O ¢ � 1 0 O --" 6LLl.,, I O w Z + 0,9L ._._........_�_.. W J co co J 1 W a- < Li DOT' D£ + Ind I W a 0'91 CL ( a p ; .....� a s I <is Z. _ a c il z i 1 g I I f j I I I� i ! I i t99t rn ._.I O 0 o I M � I 1 -- to = Mm I I I I. O.Qt I rn M C4 M _N I C w .1 I 6t'L1 13 W 09+ Ind C, Y 3 1'9l Mo I I I I O1 a I I I I w 0 2 r ..._...___._..__ —_ZS'L 1 co co _t......____ _._.___ m m w Lo V1 N^ -j i i O Y 3 09t I O o w Imm a Ix Ix Q - - - 1-__...._...._._._............. ---- _- ....T N ._.._...._._.. _.__.. O W I I I a I ...____�_ .._ B t l3 a W 1 �_.__......._.. _._f _ +Ind I I a 0'91 OD � I I 4 I ' I $g N N i e aGi "' M j O _, __.._......__.. ......... __ ........ _. LI w I 6St.._L. ..._...co +_. to I I 1 ............. + I I + I + o I i I i I 6'91 II 1 + 1 t'Lt 13 I I I ;+ Ind I I I d Z N -._......_....911 f I 0'91 t0 p I I o0 M m M M I I I tt - -- I I ... ... i ........ __._.._.__'m I II i I t I II I i I ' o I O I I O O M I I 1'91 CIO I ±I N 6'9 t 0 p e � � � � {�§ e §( ) 22 §| z §E!� « § t �8 k q§ =eT. T 2° + ] < �rr�2R�) A §�§82$C4 § §'■ / mmaj }��2� ; d ]Nn Ho ¥n M C O 00 U) �t N O z° N r- r �— r ,-- 00 O + _..__._ a _O BB'9 + 1 J N - 00 t l3 z z o = l3 l93 8+ V- 0 Q LL 1 M LD'9l 0)dv, J NOWWI d 3 9£ +6Z8 0 86'L t 3 '02! 33 �7 C3�O o 0 Z+ l 3 + Nd dl H 1 0 3 I I � 0_ CO Z8113 I I 1 B 9L K } ul J I I I I I 00 +8Z,8 vis 3NIl HOldNI w 1 I I r sT— �t 1 I 1 I I I co „= v°io III 1 1 i j I lxal I I I ro! ;JHCO)41 10d 3 I o0 I Gan I mil I I I �a I c� m m io 9 I 1 CL N9l Zl ,4Z ,Z y I w I I + I co ^I I+ a I I I F I ZS II I w EASEMENT ICI I I° + O I I I 1 aye ' TEMP. I I. I I �15 I EASEMENT Y I i I N i + Im ^ m I I oI I o o `� d' I I' j i 0 to 00 04 47 All o z 1 I + III t if I Og tit I III w "I I X o w ___ j_ __.__....... -._... _ __._...___.._...__.__.__._.._.. m c i 1 1( I i c am\ � I I' I II I I z[ zl 1 tr m , g �m �m ir z I 4Z D pp Go Go �O I n Ig X I COI 1� 1 N N zx zx N � o �m8m �M 3w �^ w ° Yo l n x ZZ U ti w W W W W m wJ 1 I I� I Ell O b a I I w in I I M, �m'_ri_iri_� I I * NI v CL "�� p n I I I I & �'; o a I ^\ �VEi�i�iJ o i t I ,n��3zz I v I I w Z I 0 >13016 H IO I ) co m. CL N m V o p i7 14 U w .._ Din I x I I d I lu IF3 • I I v~) I t111 I I I 9 g I I l i I X J On N_ co v n m� S e � I I w I 0 a ww rl I i 0 I II Iv s ++ a I ° I to X mo Z Sg �00 u W 0 0 . I �. ^ � � I + I I II I e j > 1~/1 P � e°v ♦ vii � � = i � Lj U e4 o. -JZaa o °oyez w� °/� I I - ��U� 11 co � D IIZEL a x i9) 91� z N F5 111 I a) I I ui 00 II I l i 1 II 1 ° I I N W I II III 11 I) l II I o0 4 o qq i! Ili I I I ,4Z 13Z X I 1 — i I i l I o !111 OB �I I - - ----- -- - -- - -- I I IIIII I N I II II i � �°, - -- cr I I I �IM CD i I 1 ro 0 1 z 11 1 rt 1 69 +Bt91 X I I II� I I I I �� I Z I II I I II I i I N tin I II$ I I I I II - - --g j X j 09*L t 1 I 00 +818 Vii 3NIl HOiV N O 00 co d N O o0 9 sl m gi N r r r r r 8 1= O ^ 1 i 1 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 16910 MEMORANDUM Date: February 28, 2002 To: Ed Kant, P.E. Transportation /Administration Director From: Joanne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Disaster Relief Funding Agreement Contract No. 02- RM- *2- 09 -21 -01 -013 Enclosed please find the original document, as referenced above (Agenda Item #161310), approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2002. Please execute the agreement and return the original to the Minutes and Records Department. Thank you. Enclosure 16910 Florida Department of Community Affairs Contract No. 02- RM- *2- 09 -21 -01 -013 DISASTER RELIEF FUNDING AGREEMENT This Agreement is between the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs (the "Grantee ") and, Collier County Government (the " Subgrantee"). This Agreement is based on the existence`of the following conditions: Tropical Storm Gabrielle had a devastating impact upon the State of Florida. The severity of the damage and losses resulted in a declaration of emergency by the Governor in Executive Order 01 -268. In consequence of Tropical Storm Gabrielle, the President of the United States declared Tropical Storm Gabrielle a major disaster in the following counties: Charlotte, Collier, DeSoto, Flagler, Manatee, Putnam, Sarasota, St. Johns, Hardee, Highlands, and Lee. The Public Assistance Program was made available to eligible applicants in the counties of Charlotte, Collier, DeSoto, Flagler, Manatee, Putnam, Sarasota, St. Johns, Hardee, Highlands, and Lee. The Agreement between the State of Florida and the Federal Emergency Management Agency governing the use of quires the State to share the costs eligible for assistance, and the State has undertaken to shar, its Subgrantees. A Budget Amendment has been prepared and is to provide for the necessary funds and authority 1 such funds re- federal financial those costs with being considered for this event. 16A10 Under the Emergency Management Act, as amended, the Department has authority to administer federal financial assistance from the Agency consequent to a presidential declaration of disaster. Based upon the existence of the foregoing conditions, the parties agree to the following: ARTICLE I. Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings unless another meaning is specified elsewhere: A. "Eligible activities" are those activities authorized in the FEMA -State Agreement, and in the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, Public Law 93 -288, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 5121 -5201; 44 C.F.R. Part 206; and applicable policies of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. B. "FEMA -State Agreement" is the agreement of October 4, 2001 between the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the State of Florida, for Disaster No. FEMA- 1393- DR -FL. ARTICLE II. APPLICABLE Law. The parties agree to all the conditions, obligations, and duties imposed by the FEMA -State Agreement and all applicable state and federal legal requirements including, without any limitation on the generality of the fore- going, the requirements of 44 C.F.R. Parts 13 and 206, and the policies of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. ARTICLE III. FUNDING and INSURANCE. Grantee shall provide funds to the Subgrantee for eligible activities for the projects approved by the Grantee and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, as specified in the approved Project Worksheets. Page 2 2 FEMA - 1393 -DR -FL 16910 Allowable costs shall be determined in accordance with 44 C.F.R. Parts 13 and 206. A. The approved Project Worksheets shall be transmitted to Subgrantee, and shall state the cumulative funding allowed, the scope of the eligible project, and the costs eligible under this Agreement. Project Worksheets may obligate or deobligate funding, thereby amending the total amount of funding. The approved Project Worksheets shall document the total eligible costs and the total federal share of those costs, which shall be seventy -five (75) percent of all eligible costs. Contingent upon an appropriation by the Florida Legislature, the Grantee agrees to provide one -half of any non - Federal share for local government and private non - profit Subgrantees. As a condition of receipt of the funding, and contingent upon an appropriation by the Florida Legislature where required, the Subgrantee similarly agrees to provide any non - Federal share not paid by the Grantee. B. As a condition to funding under this Agreement, the Subgrantee agrees that the Grantee may withhold funds otherwise payable to Subgrantee from any disbursement to Grantee upon a determination by Grantee or Federal Emergency Management Agency that funds exceeding the eligible costs have been disbursed to Subgrantee pursuant to this Agreement or any other funding agreement administered by Grantee. C. As a further condition to funding under this Agreement, the Subgrantee agrees to procure insurance sufficient for the type or types of hazards for which the disaster was declared to cover Page 3 3 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16810 any and all projects to be funded under this Agreement where insurance is available and reasonable. Subgrantee shall provide Grantee with a certificate of such insurance as a condition to funding under this Agreement. ARTICLE IV. DUPLICATION OF BENEFITS PROHIBITION. Subgrantee may not receive funding under this Agreement to pay for damage covered by insurance, nor may Subgrantee receive any other duplicate benefits under this Agreement. A. Subgrantee shall without delay advise Grantee of any insurance coverage for the damage identified on the applicable Project Worksheets and of any entitlement to compensation or indemnification from such insurance. Subgrantee shall reimburse Grantee without delay for any duplicate benefits Subgrantee may receive from any other source for any damage identified on the applicable Project Worksheets for which Subgrantee has received payment from Grantee, to the extent of any such duplication. B. In the event that Grantee should determine that Subgrantee has received duplicate benefits, by its execution of this Agreement the Subgrantee gives Grantee or the Comptroller of the State of Florida the authority to set off the sum of any such duplicate benefits by withholding it from any other funds otherwise due and owing to Subgrantee. ARTICLE V. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL, PLANNING AND PERMITTING LAWS. Subgrantee shall be responsible for the implementation and completion of the approved projects described in the Project Worksheets in a manner acceptable to Grantee, and Page 4 4 FEMA - 1393 -DR -FL 16910 in accordance with applicable legal requirements. The contract documents for any project undertaken by Subgrantee, and any land use permitted by or engaged in by Subgrantee, shall be consistent with the local government Comprehensive Plan. Subgrantee shall ensure that any development or development order complies with all applicable planning, permitting and building requirements. Subgrantee shall engage such competent engineering, building, and other technical and professional assistance at all project sites as may be needed to ensure that the project complies with the contract documents. ARTICLE VI. Required Documentation, Reviews and Inspections. Subgrantee shall create and maintain documentation of work performed and costs incurred on each project identified in a Project Worksheet sufficient to permit a formal audit comporting with ordinary, customary and prudent public accounting requirements. Upon the failure of Subgrantee to create and maintain such documentation, Grantee may terminate further funding under this Agreement, and Subgrantee shall reimburse to Grantee all payments disbursed earlier to Subgrantee, together with any and all accrued interest. A. Subgrantee shall submit the following documentation for Large Projects (the Small Project threshold for this declaration is $50,600.00): 1. A Request for Advance or Reimbursement conforming to the sample attached to this Agreement as Attachment A; 2. A Summary of Documentation Form conforming to the sample Page 5 5 FEMA - 1393- DR -Ft. 16B10 attached to this Agreement as Attachment B, which shall be supported by original documents such as contract documents, invoices, purchase orders, change orders and the like; 3. A request for final inspection; 4. A signed Project Listing upon the completion of all projects; and 5. The Project Listing and Certification specified by Paragraph B of this Article. B. For all projects, Subgrantee shall state on the Project Listing and Certification that all work was performed in accordance with this Agreement and the requirements in each Project Worksheet, and shall state the date of completion. C. Grantee will inspect Small Projects by random selection, and will conduct the final inspections on Large Projects, to ensure that all work has been performed within the scope of work specified on the Project Worksheets. Costs not within the approved scope of work shall not be reimbursed. ARTICLE VII. Cost Sharing. The federal share of the eligible costs specified in the Project Worksheets under this Agreement shall be seventy -five (7S) percent of such costs and the nonfederal share shall be twenty -five (25) percent. As a condition of funding under this Agreement, the Grantee shall pay fifty (50) percent of the nonfederal share and Subgrantee shall pay the remaining fifty (50) percent. Payment of all or a specified portion of the nonfederal share of such costs is contingent upon an appropriation defining the apportionment of the Page 6 6 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16810 nonfederal share. Administrative costs in addition to the Project Worksheets that are otherwise eligible under 44 C.F.R. Part 206 and do not require matching funds will also be funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. ARTICLE VIII. Payment of Costs. Grantee shall disburse the eligible costs to Subgrantee in accordance with the following procedures. A. Grantee shall disburse the federal and nonfederal shares of the eligible costs for Small Projects to Subgrantee as soon as practicable after execution of this Agreement and formal notification by the Federal Emergency Management Agency of its approval of the pertinent Project Worksheet. B. Grantee shall reimburse Subgrantee for the federal and nonfederal shares of the eligible costs for Large Projects as soon as practicable after Subgrantee has delivered the following documents to Grantee: 1. A Request for Advance or Reimbursement Form conforming to the sample attached to this Agreement as Attachment A; 2. A Summary of Documentation Form conforming to the sample attached to this Agreement as Attachment B, which shall be supported by original documents such as contract documents, invoices, purchase orders, change orders and the like; and 3. A letter or notification certifying that the reported costs were incurred in the performance of eligible work. C. Grantee may advance funds under this Agreement to Subgrantee not exceeding the federal share if Subgrantee meets Page 7 7 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL the following conditions: 16810 1. Subgrantee shall demonstrate to Grantee that Subgrantee has procedures in place to ensure that funds are disbursed to project vendors, contractors, and subcontractors without unnecessary delay; 2. Subgrantee shall submit to Grantee the budget supporting the request; 3. Subgrantee shall submit a statement justifying the advance and the proposed use of the funds, and specifying the amount of funds requested; 4. Subgrantee shall submit a completed Request for Advance or Reimbursement Form; and 5. Subgrantee shall pay over to Grantee any interest earned on advances for remittance to the Federal Emergency Management Agency as often as practicable, and in any event not later than ten (10) business days after the close of each calendar quarter. D. Subgrantee may make improvements to the project facility in conjunction with its restoration of the facility to its predisaster condition in accordance with 44 C.F.R. Part 206 with the prior written approval of Grantee. E. In any case in which Subgrantee certifies to Grantee in writing that the restoration of a damaged public facility to its predisaster condition is not in the best interest of the public, Subgrantee may request Grantee and the Federal Emergency Management Agency to approve an alternate project in accordance with 44 C.F.R. Part 206 before the commencement of any work. Page 8 8 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16610 F. Grantee may, in its discretion, withhold its portion of the nonfederal share of funding under this Agreement from Subgrantee if Grantee has reason to expect a subsequent unfavorable determination by the Federal Emergency Management Agency that a previous disbursement of funds under this Agreement was improper. ARTICLE IX. Final Payment. Grantee shall disburse the final payment to Subgrantee upon the performance of the following conditions: A. Subgrantee shall have completed the project; B. Subgrantee shall have submitted the documentation specified in Articles VI and VIII of this Agreement; C. In the case of Large Projects, the Grantee shall have performed the final inspection; D. In the case of Small Projects, the Project Listing and Certification shall have been reviewed by Grantee, or Grantee shall have performed a final inspection; and E. Subgrantee shall have requested final reimbursement. ARTICLE X. Records Maintenance. The funding of eligible costs under this Agreement and the performance of all other conditions shall be subject to the following requirements, in addition to such other and further requirements as may be imposed by operation of law: A. The "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments," as codified in 44 C.F.R. Part 13, as amended; Page 9 9 FFMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16810 B. Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A -87, "Cost Principles for State and Local Governments," as amended; C. Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A -110, "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Other Agree- ments with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Non - Profit Organizations," as amended; and D. Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A -122, "Cost Principles for Non - Profit Organizations," as amended. E. Subgrantee will maintain all documentation concerning the projects funded under this Agreement until the occurrence of the following events, whichever is the later: 1. The completion of final inspection and final audit, and the final resolution of any issues identified in the same; or 2. The expiration of three (3) years from the date of final disbursement under this Agreement. F. Subgrantee shall make all documentation concerning the projects funded under this Agreement available and accessible to the Comptroller General of the United States, the Grantee, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays other than official holidays. ARTICLE XI. Reimbursement of Funds. If upon final inspection, final audit, or other review by Grantee, the Federal Emergency Management Agency or other authority determines that the disbursements to Subgrantee under this Agreement exceed the eligible costs, Subgrantee shall reimburse to Grantee the sum by which the total disbursements exceed the eligible costs within Page 10 10 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16B10 forty -five (45) days from the date Subgrantee is notified of such determination. ARTICLE XII. Audit. Subgrantee shall submit an Audit of Agreement Compliance to Grantee, and shall have an independent audit performed by a Certified Public Accountant if its total expenditures of federal financial assistance for the most recent fiscal year equal or exceed $300,000.00. A. Subgrantee will conduct the audit in accordance with the following requirements: 1. The standards established by the Comptroller General of the United States, as specified in the General Accounting Office Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities and Functions; 2. The standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants; 3. The requirements of H 11.45, 216.349, and 216.3491, Fla. Stat. (2001), and the Rules of the Auditor General; 4. The requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, Pub. L. 98 -502, as amended, 31 U.S.C. H 7501 -7507, to the extent here applicable; and 5. Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A -133, as amended, to the extent here applicable. B. The audit shall be identified by the serial contract identification number for this Agreement. If the Subgrantee is a private nonprofit organization, it shall submit an organization - wide audit. Page 11 11 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16810 C. The audit shall be due not later than seven (7) months after the close of the fiscal year for Subgrantee except where Grantee and Subgrantee have mutually agreed upon another date. D. Subgrantee shall conduct such additional audits as Grantee or the Federal Emergency Management Agency may determine necessary to determine the adequacy, accuracy, and reliability of the internal procedures Subgrantee has in place to protect its assets and to ensure compliance with this Agreement. E. If this Agreement is closed out without an audit, Grantee may recover from Subgrantee any disallowed costs identified in an audit after such closeout. ARTICLE XIII. Noncompliance. If the Subgrantee violates this Agreement or any legislation, regulation, statute, rule or other legal requirement applicable to the performance of this Agreement, the Grantee may withhold any disbursement otherwise due Subgrantee for the project with respect to which the violation has occurred until the violation is cured or has otherwise come to final resolution. If the violation is not cured, Grantee may terminate this Agreement and invoke its remedies under the Agreement in accordance with Articles XXI and XXV of this Agreement. ARTICLE XIV. Nondiscrimination by Contractors Subgrantee shall undertake an active program of nondiscrimination in its administration of disaster assistance under this Agreement, in accordance with 44 C.F.R. Parts 7 and 16, and 44 C.F.R Part 206. In addition, Subgrantee shall be subject to the requirements in Page 12 12 FEMA - 1393 -DR -FL 16610 the General Services Administrative Consolidated List of Debarred, Suspended and Ineligible Contractors, in accordance with 44 C.F.R Part 17. ARTICLE XV. Modification. The time for performance of this Agreement may be extended once unless the failure of Subgrantee to close out the project is caused by events beyond its control. A modification extending the time for completion of the project and any other modification shall be in writing, and shall take effect only upon execution by both parties. Modifications to any Project Worksheet to be funded under this Agreement may be requested by Subgrantee through Grantee, but the approval of any such modifications shall reside in the sole discretion of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Any approved modification to a Project Worksheet shall be noted in a Supplemental Project Worksheet for the project. If otherwise allowed under this Agreement, any extension shall be in writing and shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as those set out in the initial Agreement. ARTICLE XVI. Time for Performance. Time shall be of the essence of this Agreement and of the performance of all conditions under it. Subject to any modification extending the time for the performance of this Agreement approved by Grantee or by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the time for the performance of emergency work shall be six (6) months from the date of the Presidential Declaration. The time for the performance of permanent work shall be eighteen (18) months from the date of the Page 13 13 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16B10 Presidential Declaration. For Large Projects the Summary of Documentation and the supporting documents identified in Article VI of this Agreement shall be submitted to the Grantee not later than sixty (60) days after the date of the last modification extending the Agreement. Subgrantee shall submit the completed Project Listing to Grantee not later than thirty (30) days from i the completion of all work, or the approval of the Final Inspection by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, whichever is later. The time for the performance of this Agreement may be extended for cause by Grantee. If any extension request is denied, Subgrantee shall be reimbursed for eligible project costs incurred up to the latest approved date for completion. Failure to complete any project will be adequate cause for the termination of funding for that project. ARTICLE XVII. Contracts With Others. If the Subgrantee contracts with any other contractor or vendor for performance of all or any portion of the work required under this Agreement, the Subgrantee shall incorporate into its contract with such contractor or vendor an indemnification clause holding Grantee and Subgrantee harmless from liability to third parties for claims asserted under such contract. ARTICLE XVIII. Termination. Either of the parties may terminate this Agreement by notice in writing delivered to the address specified in Article XXIII of this Agreement. Such termination shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of such notice. Such termination shall not affect the rights, Page 14 14 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16B10 interests, duties or responsibilities of either of the parties or any allowable costs that have accrued as of the date of the notice of termination. ARTICLE XIX. Liability. A. Grantee assumes no liability to third parties in connection with this Agreement. Unless the Subgrantee is a governmental entity covered by § 768.28(5), Fla. Stat. (2001), the Subgrantee shall be solely responsible to any and all contractors, vendors, and other parties with whom it contracts in performing this Agreement. Unless the Subgrantee is a governmental entity within the meaning of the preceding sentence, Subgrantee shall indemnify Grantee from claims asserted by to third parties in connection with the performance of this Agreement, holding Grantee and Subgrantee harmless from the same. B. For the purpose of this Agreement, the Grantee and Subgrantee agree that neither one is an employee or agent of the other, and that each one stands as an independent contractor in relation to the other. C. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver by Grantee or Subgrantee of any legal immunity, nor shall anything in this Agreement be construed as a consent by either of the parties to be sued by third parties in connection with any matter arising from the performance of this Agreement. D. Subgrantee represents that to the best of its knowledge any hazardous substances at its project site or sites are present in quantities within statutory and regulatory limitations, and do Page 15 15 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16B10 not require remedial action under any federal, state or local legal requirements concerning such substances. Subgrantee further represents that the presence of any such substance or any condition at the site caused by the presence of any such substance shall be addressed in accordance with all applicable legal requirements. ARTICLE XX. Reports. Subgrantee shall provide Quarterly Reports to Grantee, on the Quarterly Report Form conforming to the sample attached as Attachment C. The first Quarterly Report shall be due at such time as Subgrantee is notified. All subsequent Quarterly Reports shall be due not later than thirty (30) days after each calendar quarter through final inspection. Quarterly Reports shall indicate the anticipated completion date for each project, together with any other circumstances that may affect the completion date, the scope of work, the project costs, or any other factors that may affect compliance with this Agreement. Interim inspections shall be scheduled by Subgrantee before the final inspection, and may be required by Grantee based on information supplied in the Quarterly Reports. Grantee may require additional reports as needed, and Subgrantee shall provide any additional reports requested by Grantee as soon as practicable. With respect to the Request for Advance or Reimbursement, the Summary of Documentation, and the Quarterly Reports, the contact for Grantee will be the State Public Assistance Officer. ARTICLE XXI. Standard Conditions. Subgrantee agrees to the Page 16 16 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL following conditions: 16B10 A. The performance and obligation of Grantee to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon an annual appropriation by the Legislature and the disbursement to Grantee of federal funding in accordance with § 252.37(4), Fla. Stat. (2001). B. Bills for fees or other compensation for services or expenses must be submitted in detail sufficient for a proper pre- audit and post- audit. C. Grantee may terminate this Agreement for refusal by the Subgrantee and its contractors and subcontractors to allow public inspection of any records subject to the disclosure requirements in § 119.07(1), Fla. Stat. (2001), that are made or received by Subgrantee or its contractors and subcontractors in connection with this Agreement. Substantial evidence of noncompliance by Subgrantee or its contractors and subcontractors with these requirements shall constitute the nonperformance of a condition under this Agreement, and shall be adequate cause for termination. D. Subgrantee agrees that no funds disbursed to it under this Agreement will be used for the purpose of lobbying the Legislature or any of its members, any employee of the State of Florida, any member of Congress, any officer or employee of Congress, or any employee of a Member of Congress, in connection with this Agreement or any modifications to this Agreement. E. Subgrantee certifies with respect to this Agreement that it possesses the legal authority to receive the funds. F. Subgrantee agrees that responsibility for compliance with Page 17 17 FEMA - 1393 -DR -FL 16810 this Agreement rests with the Subgrantee, and further agrees that noncompliance with this Agreement shall be adequate cause for the recission, suspension or termination of funding under this Agreement, and may affect its eligibility for funding under future Subgrantee Agreements. ARTICLE XXII. Term. This Agreement shall take effect upon its execution by both parties, and shall terminate upon the approval of closeout by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, unless terminated earlier as specified elsewhere in this Agreement. Subgrantee shall commence the project(s) specified by this Agreement without delay. ARTICLE XXIII. Notice and Contact. All notices under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered by InterNet, by telefacsimile, by hand, or by certified letter to the following respective addresses. FOR THE GRANTEE: W. Craig Fugate, Director Division of Emergency Management Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2100 FOR THE SUBGRANTEE: Edward J. Kant, P.E. Transportation pera ions Director 2705 S.- orses oe Drive Naples, FL 34104 ARTICLE XXIV. Designation of Accent Subgrantee hereby designates sward J. Kant, P.R. as its primary agent, and designates Robert W. Tipton, P.E. as its alternate agent, to execute any Request for Advance or Reimbursement, certification, or other necessary documentation. ARTICLE XXV. Events of Default Remedies and Termination. A. Upon the occurrence of any one or more of the following Page 18 18 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16810 events, all obligations of Grantee to disburse further funds under this Agreement shall terminate at the option of Grantee. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, Grantee may at its option continue to make payments or portions of payments after the occurrence of any one or more such events without waiving the right to exercise such remedies and without incurring liability for further payment. Grantee may at its option terminate this Agreement and any and all funding under this Agreement upon the occurrence of any one or more of the following: 1. Any representation by Subgrantee in this Agreement is inaccurate or incomplete in any material respect, or Subgrantee has breached any condition of this Agreement or any previous agreement with Grantee and has not cured in timely fashion, or is unable or unwilling to meet its obligations under this Agreement. 2. Subgrantee suffers any material adverse change in its financial condition while this Agreement is in effect, as compared to its financial condition as represented in any reports or other documents submitted to Grantee, if Subgrantee has not cured the condition within thirty (30) days after notice in writing from Grantee; 3. Any reports required by this Agreement have not been submitted to Grantee or have been submitted with inaccurate, incomplete, or inadequate information; or 4. The monies necessary to fund this Agreement are unavailable due to any failure to appropriate or other action or inaction by Congress or the Legislature, or due to any action of Page 19 19 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16B10' the Office of the Comptroller or the Office of Management and Budget. B. Upon the occurrence of any one or more of the following events, Grantee may at its option give notice in writing to Subgrantee to cure its failure of performance if such failure may be cured. Upon the failure of Subgrantee to cure, Grantee may exercise any one or more of the following remedies: 1. Terminate this Agreement upon not less than fifteen (15) days notice of such termination by certified letter to the Subgrantee at the address specified in Article XXIII of this Agreement, such notice to take effect when delivered to Subgrantee; 2. Commence a legal action for the judicial enforcement of this Agreement; 3. Withhold the disbursement of any payment or any portion of a payment otherwise due and payable under this Agreement or any other Agreement with Subgrantee; and 4. Take any other remedial actions which may otherwise be available under law. C. Grantee may terminate this Agreement for any misrepresentation of any material fact, for the failure or nonperformance of any condition or obligation under this Agreement, or for noncompliance with any applicable legal requirement. D. Recission, suspension or termination of this Agreement shall constitute final action by the Grantee within the meaning of Page 20 20 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16B10 the Administrative Procedure Act, as amended. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, any deobligation of funds or other determination by the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall be addressed in accordance with the regulations of that Agency. E. Upon the recission, suspension or termination of this Agreement, the Subgrantee shall refund to Grantee all funds disbursed to Subgrantee under this Agreement. F. The venue of any action or proceeding by either Grantee or Subgrantee for the enforcement of'this Agreement or for an adjudication of the rights, interests, or duties of the parties to it shall lie in Leon County, State of Florida. G. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary elsewhere in this Agreement, the recission suspension or termination of this Agreement by Grantee shall not relieve Subgrantee of liability to Grantee for the restitution of funds advanced to Subgrantee under this Agreement, and Grantee may set off any such funds by withholding future disbursements otherwise due Subgrantee under this Agreement or any other Agreement until such time as the exact amount of restitution due Grantee from Subgrantee is determined. In the event the Federal Emergency Management Agency should deobligate funds formerly allowed under this Agreement or under any other Agreement funded by the Agency and administered by Grantee, then Subgrantee shall immediately repay such funds to Grantee. If the Subgrantee fails to repay any such funds, then Grantee may recover the same from funding otherwise due Subgrantee in accordance with this Article. Page 21 21 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16810 ARTICLE XXVI. Attachments. A. All attachments to this Agreement are incorporated into this Agreement by reference as if set out fully in the text of the Agreement itself. B. In the event of any inconsistencies between the language of this Agreement and the Attachments to it, the language of the Attachments shall be controlling, but only to the extent of such inconsistencies. C. This Agreement has the following attachments: 1. Attachment A 2. Attachment B 3. Attachment C "Request for Advance or Reimbursement" "Summary of Documentation" "Quarterly Report Schedule and Instructions" Page 22 22 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16810 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the Grantee and Subgrantee have executed this agreement: FOR THE GRANTEE: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, State of Florida, By: W. Craig Fugate W. Craig Fugate, Director Division of Emergency Management DATE: DW,sGtI t;.BRO" z t. ,� B; U - �AtiLaLL iR Atiwa Date:o` Public Assistance Program Program Description 02 -RM- *209 -21 -0 1 -013 Contract Number Approved as to form and Legal sufficiency: �7 Robert ZN.Z2hh`aryy Assistant County Attorney FOR THE SUBGRANTEE: COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Transportation Operations ( Subgrantee) (Signature) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA �- JamqW Date• Federal Employer ID No. 1601 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 113 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIENS FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL THE 1991 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board of County Commissioners on January 26, 1993 adopted Resolution No. 93 -29 authorizing the recording of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1991; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 93 -29, was recorded on February 1, 1993 in Official Record Book 1793, Pages 459 through 598 of the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, which placed a lien on certain properties for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1991; and WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, requires the Board to approve by Resolution and record in the Official Records a Satisfaction of Liens on all accounts that have been paid in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the 1991 Service Year Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Special Assessments for the following accounts numbered below, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. 93 -29, whereupon a lien had been recorded on real property pertaining to the accounts identified herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts identified herein are hereby approved and the Chairman is hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, and the Clerk is directed to record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien individually in the official records of Collier County: Account No. 4103 Account No. 4750 Account No. 28202 Account No. 59501 This Resolution adopted this aG day of 56L , 2002, after motion, second and majority vote 2940406 OR; 2989 PG; 3426 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:37AN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 10.50 COPIES 2.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR E8T 7240 ATTEST: ' D.VylppT F,. -PPOCK, CLERK A� ��0 Chiin�ini si�ca Mid. Approved as to form and legal su David C. igel County Attorney 16C1 JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN *** OR; 2989 PG; 3427 * ** This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774-8400 Property Folio No. 00099640002 16CI * ** 2940407 OR; 2989 PG; 3428 RECORDED iD OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09 :37AX DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FBI 6,00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Anderson Sr Et Ux, Curtis W Rt 6 Box 1857 -A Naples, FL 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 19th day of September, 1994, in Official Record Book 1986, Pages 766 through 942, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and No Cents ($102.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 24 47 27 E1/2 OF NW1 /4 OF SW1 /4 OF NE1 /4 5 AC OR 635 PG 1721 Folio No. Project No. Account No 00099640002 60000 4103 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this o24-xZ Z day of �- 2002. A +'t . K U C! f rown ' S s1►� Mly ATTEST:: BOARD OF CO TY MIS ION S _DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER CO Y, CO FL I t- JAM N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and le 7ciency ROBERT Z HARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774-8400 Property Folio No. 00117440003 16C1 2940408 OR; 2989 PG; 3429 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, 03/01/2002 at 09:37AN DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLERK RIC FIB COPIES Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Edison, Glendell 408 School Dr Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 19th day of September, 1994, in Official Record Book 1986, Pages 766 through 942, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred Four Dollars and No Cents ($204.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 3 47 29 N 48.5FT OF W 165FT OF SW1 /4 OF SE1 /4 OF SW1 /4, LESS W 30FT FOR R/W .06 AC OR 800 PG 760 Folio No. 00117440003 Project No. 60000 Account No. 4750 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 205c;G day of —�.C,. 2002. =; q C1►a 1 rsan - s •DVVt.dHT E. eRdi K, CLERK �4 Approved as to form an iency �7 RO ERT C ARY FL 6,00 1,00 This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774-8400 Property Folio No. 30733080008 1601 .. 2940409 OR: 2989 PG; 3430 RECORDED iD OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, 03/01/2002 at 09:37AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI COPIES Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR B %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Garcia, Mario M & Sonia T 1301 Apple St Eden Park Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 19th day of September, 1994, in Official Record Book 1986, Pages 766 through 942, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and No Cents ($102.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: EDEN PARK 1ST ADD BLK 12 LOT 2 OR 998 PG 1796 Folio No. 30733080008 Project No. 60000 Account No. 28202 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfa� of Lien, by action of the Board this o'�G�� day of r • - 2002. Attelt -:;44 Ito Ch �iiinn' s sighitrR M]y.° ATTEST:' BOARD OF COUNTY CO ISSIONERS DWIGHT, E.. BROOK, CLERK COLLIER CO FL ID JAM N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and 'ency R013ERT ARY FL 6.00 1.00 This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774-8400 Property Folio No. 52650760007 16CI T 2940410 OR; 2989 PG; 3431 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, 03/01/2002 at 09 :37AN DWIGHT B. BROCB, CLERK RBC FEE Retn; COPIES CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Arevalo, Jesus G & Marie C 406 Washington Ave Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 19th day of September, 1994, in Official Record Book 1986, Pages 766 through 942, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and No Cents ($102.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: JOYCE PARK BILK B LOT 11 OR 1003 PG 1879 Folio No. 52650760007 Project No. 60000 Account No. 59501 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Sttisfi cOion of Lien, by action of the Board this 7C4 day of 2002. AtNt " to chi iraan's t.= ATTEST: `7.?WIGHT'E. BROCK, CLERK Approved as to form and le ncy ROBERTZACXKRY Af • FL 6.00 1.00 16C2 RESOLUTION NO. 2002 - 1 1 4 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIENS FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL THE 1992 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board of County Commissioners on September 19, 1994 adopted Resolution No. 94 -668 authorizing the recording of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1992; and WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, requires the Board to approve by Resolution and record in the Official Records a Satisfaction of Lien on all accounts that have been paid in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the 1992 Service Year Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Special Assessment for the following accounts numbered below, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. 94 -668, whereupon a lien had been recorded on real property pertaining to the accounts identified herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts identified herein are hereby approved and the Chairman is hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, and the Clerk is directed to record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien individually in the official records of Collier County: Account No. 6004 Account No. 6554 Account No. 8701 Account No. 20352 Account No. 36304 Account No. 40358 Account No. 89005 Account No. 95206 Account No. 112901 Account No. 121905 2940415 OR; 2989 PG; 3449 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:45AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FBI 10.50 COPIES 2.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR IYT 7240 This Resolution adopted this Z&,cr- day of , 2002, after motion, second and majority vote. ATTEST: DWLOH fi`:OCK, CLERK sit �s #o Ck Ap vetl iti for`rn and legal s4 avid C. Vydit6el County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COU , FLO ID � � � •-:, BY: JAMS N. COLETTA, CI•-TAIRMAN * ** OR; 2989 PG; 3450 * ** This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774-8400 Property Folio No. 00099640002 * ** 2940416 OR; 2989 PG; 3451 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:45AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C2 B %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Anderson Sr, Curtis W =& Cheryl 2075 Sanctuary Rd Naples, FL 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 19th day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1986, Pages 766 through 942, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Three Dollars and Two Cents ($103.02) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 24 47 27 E1 /2 OF NW1 /4 OF SW1 /4 OF NE1 /4 5 AC OR 635 PG 1721 Folio No. 00099640002 Project No. 61000 Account No. 6004 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 26c.day of ... Ch& 1 run's s_f,�rittore ow � "yt:; ATl�EST t_:, BOARD OF COUNTY CO MISSIONERS �DVVIGHT EK.Ef?O -CK, CLERK COLLIER COI IN JY, FL ID JAM N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approi6d 'as`to form and le 7iency ROBERT ARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774-8400 Property Folio No. 00108880009 * ** 2940417 OR; 2989 PG; 3452' RBCORDBD iD OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:15AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEB 6.00 COFIBS 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD 6C2 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BYT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Garza, Mario =& Herbey J P O Box 795 Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 19th day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1986, Pages 766 through 942, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Three Dollars and Two Cents ($103.02) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 26 47 27 W/2 of SE1 /4 of SW1 /4 OF SW1 /4 LESS N & S 30FT 4.54 AC OR 1360 PG 555 Folio No. 00108880009 Project No. 61000 Account No. 6554 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this AG7zxday of`�.. 200,2. Attast'`af.4o Chairman's S'i:gRsttire `6111. ATTEST:::, BOARD OF COUNTY COM ISSIONERS =� DWIGHT E`. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COU FLO D By: JAM N. COLETTA, CHA MAN Approved as to form and le al iency ROBERT ZA Y This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774-8400 Property Folio No. 00130200000 * ** 2940418 OR; 2989 PG; 3453 **1 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03101/2002 at 09:45AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLIRI REC FBI 6.00 COFIBS 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C2 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Giddens, Vera 403 Taylor St Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 19th day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1986, Pages 766 through 942, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Three Dollars and Two Cents ($103.02) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 5 47 29 PAR DESC IN OR 36 PG 116, LESS N 5FT OF W 95FT, OR 821 PG 1399 Folio No. 00130200000 Project No. 61000 Account No. 8701 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thiSO14,& day of 2002.' Att�lil lt: as to 0Airman's ATTEST: BOARD OF COUrJTY COM ISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BF'=_4 064(, CLERK COLLIER COUNV, FLO D By: JAME N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and le al iency ROBERT 2-AOARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774-8400 Property Folio No. 00764560006 * ** 2940419 OR, 2989 PG; 3454 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09 :45AN DWIGHT E, BROCI, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C2 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Flores, Juan =& Armandina P O Box 2727 Labelle, FL 339350000 The Lien was recorded on the 19th day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1986, Pages 766 through 942, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred One Dollars and forty Eight Cents ($201.48) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 20 51 27 FROM N1/4 CNR OF SEC 20, RUN S1186.16FT, N 89 DEG W633.43FT TO POB, N 100FT, S89 DEG E200FT, S 100FT, N89 DEG W20OFT TO POB .46 AC Folio No. 00764560006 Project No. 61000 Account No. 20352 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thiso?6 tt day of ,—, � 2002. Attest ATTEST: DWtG-HT E:,•BROCK, CLERK Approved`as to'fbmr and ' le I ency RO ERT ZA A Y /� ■nom /��rr � / This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774-8400 Property Folio No. 30733080008 * ** 2940420 OR: 2989 PG: 3455 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:45AN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C2 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EYT 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Trevino, Guadalupe 1301 Apple St Eden Park Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 19th day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1986, Pages 766 through 942, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Three Dollars and Two Cents ($103.02) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: EDEN PARK 1ST ADD BLK 12 LOT 2 OR 1569 PG 1312 Folio No. 30733080008 Project No. 61000 Account No. 36304 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 246,dday of, - 2002. Attaat e•�e to Chi i rman ' s fJr* '11 "I�., .-'DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK ";j�,pproved'as to form and; I ncy RObERT Z60WRY MA A��i �� • This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774-8400 Property Folio No. 35752520007 * ** 2940421 OR; 2989 PG; 3456 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:45AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD 16 C2 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Buran Jr, Thomas K Thomas K =& Mary J Boran Sr 2191 SW 43`d Ln Naples, FL 339400000 The Lien was recorded on the 19th day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1986, Pages 766 through 942, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Dollars and Seventy Four Cents ($100.74) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 2 BLK 28 LOT 26 OR 1616 PG 1469 Folio No. 35752520007 Project No. 61000 Account No. 40358 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ,244eday 2002`. AtWt as to C411 roan ' s ATTEST :. BOARD OF COLIN Y COM SSIONERS nDWIGHT E:A3RQCK, CLERK COLLIER COU FLO A JAME . COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and 'ciency RO ERT ZACXAPY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774-8400 Property Folio No. 52651160004 * ** 2940422 OR; 2989 PG; 3457 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:45AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FBI 6.00 OPIIS 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD 6CJ . INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Agosto Et Ux, 206 8" St No Immokalee, FL Carmelo C 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 19th day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1986, Pages 766 through 942, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Three Dollars and Two Cents ($103.02) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: JOYCE PARK BLK C LOT 3 OR 493 PG 507 Folio No. 52651160004 Project No. 61000 Account No. 89005 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisal,�64day 2002. A t"t +t ;tq Cha i r041n , S ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E;BFOCK, CLERK COLLIER COU Y, FL O D By: JAM N. COLETTA,-CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and I a iency R ERT ZA ARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774-8400 Property Folio No. 56405040004 * ** 2940423 OR: 2989 PG: 3458 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:45AN DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Rein: 16C CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EYT 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Arevalo, Jesus G =& Marie Cruz 406 Washington Ave Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 19th day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1986, Pages 766 through 942, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Three Dollars and Two Cents ($103.02) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: MAINLINE BLK 5 LOT 27 OR 543 PG 965 Folio No. 56405040004 Project No. 61000 Account No. 95206 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this gZG,z%day of -,-457, 2002. Attract ; ttt:. +,�� 1 rr�d ii sllp4� 0411y" ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COYMISSIONERS OWPgHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER CO FL ID l_ IW By: '. JAM S N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved' as'to form and le al s ncy ROBIERT2ACHYW This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774-8400 Property Folio No. 62258480009 * ** 2940424 OR: 2989 PG: 3459 **' RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:45AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK REC FBI 6.00 1CCC2 S 1.00 CLEAK TO ?HB BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: McDougal, Robert D 5310 Texas Ave Naples, FL 339620000 The Lien was recorded on the 19th day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1986, Pages 766 through 942, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Dollars and Seventy Four Cents ($100.74) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES MANOR LAKES BLK 10 LOT 5 OR 901 PG 1790 Folio No. 62258480009 Project No. 61000 Account No. 112901 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 74,aday 01. Rtiit as >oba 1 raan' S YE, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT'('J BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COU , FL O A r. V, JAM N. COLET A, CHA AN Approved as to form and le al iency �7 RObERf ZACPIARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774-8400 Property Folio No. 63100120005 * ** 2940425 OR; 2989 PG; 3460 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS Of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:45AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLBRK RBC FBI 6.00 Retn: 16-C2 IRS 1.00 CLBRK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Newberry, Annie M 4810 Aztec Cir Naples, FL 339620000 The Lien was recorded on the 19th day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1986, Pages 766 through 942, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Dollars and Seventy Four Cents ($100.74) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES SOUTH UNIT 1 BLK 1 LOT 3 OR 1916 PG 1024 Folio No. 63100120005 Project No. 61000 Account No. 121905 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisa?G;eGday of —_e,& 2002. Attest '4617'u Chilradn -S` sign sell. , ATTEST BOARD OF COUNTY COM ISSIONERS DWIOHT'E. BROCK, OtERK COLLIER COUN FLO D By: JAME . COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as'to form and le al iency RO ERT ZAC RY 16C3 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 115 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIENS FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL THE 1993 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board of County Commissioners on September 20, 1994 adopted Resolution No. 94 -694 authorizing the recording of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1993; and WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, requires the Board to approve by Resolution and record in the Official Records a Satisfaction of Lien on all accounts that have been paid in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the 1993 Service Year Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Special Assessment for the following accounts numbered below, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. 94 -694, whereupon a lien had been recorded on real property pertaining to the accounts identified herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts identified herein are hereby approved and the Chairman is hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, and the Clerk is directed to record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien individually in the official records of Collier County Account No. 1164 Account No. 5092 Account No. 7278 Account No. 8196 Account No. 17718 Account No. 17734 Account No. 22538 Account No. 28561 This Resolution adopted this a day of 2002, after motion, second and majority vote. 2940465 OR; 2990 PG; 0079 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:59AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 10.50 COPIES 2.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 7240 ATTEST:. C r DWIGHT E. 'B' OQK, CLERK a Attest" to'64' tnsan's Approved as to form and legal su i i y: avid C. W el County Att rney 16C3 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA I JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN * ** OR; 2990 PG; 0080 * ** *** 2MW6 W. 2SH ?G. AVAVOU11 **) This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 RECORDED iD OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:59AK DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C3 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 Property Folio No. 00108880009 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Garza, Mario =& Herbey J P O Box 795 Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 22nd day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1987, Pages 1514 through 1749, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Three Dollars and Two Cents ($103.02) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 26 47 27 W1 /2 OF SE1 /4 OF SW1 /4 OF SW1 /4 LESS N & S 30FT 4.54 AC OR 1360 PG 555 Folio No. 00108880009 Project No. 63000 Account No. 1164 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recor ing of this Satisfacti?,n of Lien, by action of the Board this24LWay of , 2002. Attat Man's ,,ATTEST. BOARD OF COUNTY COM ISSIONERS .`'DWIGH;C E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COU FLO A yGl Z JAmEWN. COLETTA, CHAT MAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency .(-R 14 11-� ROBERT HARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 24477680000 *** 2940467 OR; 2990 PG; 0082 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:59AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6100 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR C 3 BKT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Bilyeau, Barbara M 1123`dSt Bonita Springs, FL 339230000 The Lien was recorded on the 22nd day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1987, Pages 1514 through 1749, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Dollars and Seventy Four Cents ($100.74) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: BONITA SHORES UNIT 1 BLK 7 LOT 1 OR 1528 PG 1195 Folio No. 24477680000 Project No. 63000 Account No. 5092 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisa?G,May of cam- , 2002. AttNt ss to X041 rman' s slgwatwr��oNl'y. ` ATTEST;. BOARD OF COUNTY COM ISSIONERS DWIC;HT°E.. BROOK, C£ "ER K COLLIER COU FLO A X7[-�: r��l,�•ir -try +.✓,� By: JAME . COLETTA, CHAT AN Approved 'as "to' form and legal sufficiency R BERT C ARY *** 2940468 OR; 2990 PG; 0083 ** This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:59AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FIB 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C3 E %T 7240 Property Folio No. 30733080008 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Trevino, Guadalupe 1301 Apple St Eden Park Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 22nd day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1987, Pages 1514 through 1749, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Three Dollars and Two Cents ($103.02) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: EDEN PARK 1ST ADD BILK 12 LOT 2 OR 1569 PG 1312 Folio No. 30733080008 Project No. 63000 Account No. 7278 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisg4gWay of , 2002. Attest w to ;CN i roan ' s s 19�atali'i 081 y. to - -, ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BRQCK CLERK )& Approvedias,tb form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZACHARY • A - . • • • • 4 • . -ILYA This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 35752520007 * ** 2940469 OR; 2990 PG; 0084 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:59AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FIE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 CLERK 1 CLERK TO THE BOARD C INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR u BIT ]240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Boran Jr, Thomas K Thomas K =& Mary J Boran Sr 2191 SW 43rd Ln Naples, FL 339400000 The Lien was recorded on the 22nd day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1987, Pages 1514 through 1749, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Dollars and Seventy Four Cents ($100.74) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 2 BLK 28 LOT 26 OR 1616 PG 1469 Folio No. 35752520007 Project No. 63000 Account No. 8196 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida;,acbN, ,through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this 11 Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this jgday of . ��. , 2002. Att t:��t to C4 ir`wan - s ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWGHT E. BRO,QK, CLERK COLLIER COU , FLO A By: JAMS". COLETT HAI N Approved as to form and legal sufficiency �7 RO ERT ZA&RRY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 52650760007 *** 2940470 OR; 2990 PG; 0085 **J RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09 :59AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 7240 3 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Arevalo, Jesus G =& Marie C 406 Washington Av Immokalee, FL 339400000 The Lien was recorded on the 22nd day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1987, Pages 1514 through 1749, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Three Dollars and Two Cents ($103.02) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: JOYCE PARK BLK B LOT 11 OR 1003 PG 1879 Folio No. 52650760007 Project No. 63000 Account No. 17718 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 4x4ay of , 2002. r. �ttNt `asr do Chairman's ATTE$t R BOARD OF COU TY COM ISSIONERS DWIGH; F- BROCK, CLERK COLLIER CO U , FL O D JAM N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ,1�7 R08ERT-ZAeFrARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 52651160004 * ** 2940471 OR: 2990 PG: 0086 * ** RICORDID in OFFICIAL RBCORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 0310112002 at 09:59AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLBRK RBC FIB 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLBRK TO THI BOARD INTIROFFICB 4TH FLOOR 16C3 BYT 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Agosto Et Ux, 2068 th St No Immokalee, FL Carmelo C 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 22nd day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1987, Pages 1514 through 1749, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Three Dollars and Two Cents ($103.02) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: JOYCE PARK BLK C LOT 3 OR 493 PG 507 Folio No. 52651160004 Project No. 63000 Account No. 17734 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisd_4_tday of 2002. Me* n to Chairman's stq�atrre sly. DWIGHT E`BROCK, CLERK ` . Approveo,as to form and legal 'sufficiency RO ERT ZA ARY .1110 IV T-3 MA I L • This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 62258480009 * ** 2940472 OR; 2990 PG; 0087 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09 :59AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C3 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR IXT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Mc Dougal, Robert D 5310 Texas Ave Naples, FL 339620000 The Lien was recorded on the 22nd day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1987, Pages 1514 through 1749, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Dollars and Seventy Four Cents ($100.74) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES MANOR LAKES BLK 10 LOT 5 OR 901 PG 1790 Folio No. 62258480009 Project No. 63000 Account No. 22538 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisg4Uday of , 2002. Attl4t as 4to Chairman's sign a 4iyei "ATTEST: DWAGHT E'.. BRQCK, CLERK ApprQyed; as" to form and legal sufficiency �7 ROBERT Z#&1ARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 74411600009 * ** 2940473 OR; 2990 PG; 0088 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:59AK DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC FIR 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C3 IXT 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Perez, Victor J =& Haydee 2707 N George Mason Dr Arlington, VA 222070000 The Lien was recorded on the 22nd day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 1987, Pages 1514 through 1749, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Dollars and Seventy Four Cents ($100.74) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: SOUTH TAMIAMI HGTS BILK C LOT 1 OR 861 PG 68 Folio No. 74411600009 Project No. 63000 Account No. 28561 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisay of , 2002. Attest as W Chairman's sty, ATTEST:' , DWJQHT E BR(7QK, CLERK r1 a� Abp oved as't6 form and egf sufficiency �7 RO ERT ZA RY 16C4 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 116 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIENS FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL THE 1994 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board of County Commissioners on August 22, 1995 adopted Resolution No. 95 -475 authorizing the recording of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1994; and WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, requires the Board to approve by Resolution and record in the Official Records a Satisfaction of Lien on all accounts that have been paid in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the 1994 Service Year Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Special Assessment for the following accounts numbered below, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. 95 -475, whereupon a lien had been recorded on real property pertaining to the accounts identified herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts identified herein are hereby approved and the Chairman is hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, and the Clerk is directed to record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien individually in the official records of Collier County: Account No. 916 Account No. 1009 Account No. 1410 Account No. 3023 Account No. 3120 Account No. 4213 Account No. 5995 Account No. 6703 Account No. 7883 Account No. 16683 Account No. 21241 Account No. 28037 2940492 OR; 2990 PG; 0182 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:20AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FEE 10.50 COPIES 2.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR I %T 7240 This Resolution adopted this day of 44L , 2002, after motion, second and majority vote. This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No: 00099640002 IM 2940493 OR; 2990 PG: 0184 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:20AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1,00 CLERK TO THE BOARD � � C � INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BXT 7240 - SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Anderson Sr, Curtis W =& Cheryl 2075 Sanctuary Rd Naples, FL 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14`h day of September 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Six Dollars and Seventy Two Cents ($106.72), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 24 47 27 E1 /2 OF NW1 /4 OF SW1 /4 OF NE1 /4 5 AC OR 635 PG 1721 Folio No. Project No. Account No 00099640002 64000 916 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this4(. day of,-,;-ea , 2002. .ATTEST: ,DWI'qHT E. B 10(;,K, CLERK At%ft as _to Chi irmns Slj�wq only. Approved as to form an iciency ROBERT ARY BOARD OF COUN Y COM ISSIONERS COLLIER COU FI-711Y4 By JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No: 00108880009 *** 2940494 OR; 2990 PG; 0185 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10 :20AN DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6,00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C4 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Garza, Mario =& Herbey J P O Box 795 Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 14`h day of September 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Six Dollars and Seventy Two Cents ($106.72), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 26 47 27 W1/2 OF SE1 /4 OF SW1 /4 OF SW1 /4 LESS N & S 30FT 4.54 AC OR 1360 PG 555 Folio No. Project No. Account No. 11 1:::111• Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisae,,d-4 day of -.ZU. , 2002. y ATTFST; Dv1416HT E bRQC K, CLERK At 4;f, to', Chi irmen'= . Approve af to form an iency ROBERT ARY • This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No: 00133480005 * ** 2940495 OR: 2990 PG: 0186 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:20AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EYT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN 16C4.14 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Johnson, James W =& Minnie B 431916 th St W Lehigh Acres, FL 339710000 The Lien was recorded on the 141h day of September 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Six Dollars and Seventy Two Cents ($106.72), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 9 47 29 SW1 /4 OF NW1 /4 OF NE1 /4, EXC R/W, LESS OR 251 PG 806, LESS OR 273 PG 465, LESS OR 353 PG 141, LESS OR 387 PG 405, LESS OR 589 PG Folio No. Project No. Account No. 00133480005 64000 1410 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this a?GG day of _�,�L. , 2002. / TfiEST: DWIGWT E BRbCK, CLERK "ur�7,,� �o— ��+i� ice.-- '►"yN' S 1' 8 u� Chi i rman ' s si001 I I o form an ' iency • MAID. • -►� This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No: 00764560006 * ** 2940496 OR; 2990 PG; 0187 RECORDED iD OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:20AM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C4 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Flores, Juan =& Armandina P O Box 2727 Labelle, FL 339350000 The Lien was recorded on the 14th day of September 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred Eight Dollars and Seventy Four Cents ($208.74), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 20 51 27 FROM N1/4 CNR OF SEC 20, RUN S1186.16FT, N 89 DEG W633.43FT TO POB, N 100FT, S89 DEG E200FT, S 100FT, N89 DEG W20OFT TO POB .46 AC Folio No. Project No. Account No. 00764560006 64000 3023 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this c,_* day of , 2002. ATTEST: ;'DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK llt e, :t as to cha i r"n S s i "ilar+t . 1 Approved 19 to form and iency R013ERT ZA ARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No: 00766960002 ,*** 2940497 OR; 2990 PG; 0188 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:20AM DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6,00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C4 ERT 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Flores, Juan =& Armandina % Corina Samarripa 17009 Morgan Dr Naples, FL 339610000 The Lien was recorded on the 14th day of September 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirty Seven Cents ($104.37), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 20 51 27 COMM' /4 CNR SEC 17 + 20, S 1651.21 FT, W 1173.93FT TO POB W 60FT N 135FT, E 60FT, S 135FT TO POB A/K/A UNREC LOT 29, BLUE HERON LAKE PARK Folio No. 00766960002 Project No. 64000 Account No. 3120 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this day of -.oZ , 2002. DWIGH`S BROCK, CLERK F . 7 Atta ;t ' W Ch& i rum s si9fw� iily. Apprgve'tl as to form and iency ROBERT ARY • This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No: 24477680000 * ** 2940498 OR: 2990 PG: 0189 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:20AK DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK RBC FIE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C4 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Bilyeau, Barbara M 112 3rd St Bonita Springs, FL 339230000 The Lien was recorded on the 14" day of September 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirty Seven Cents ($104.37), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: BONITA SHORES UNIT 1 BLK 7 LOT 1 OR 1528 PG 1195 Folio No. Project No. Account No. 24477680000 64000 4213 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ae tg day of , 2002. ` AT - BOARD OF COUNTY CO MISSIONERS DW'IG'HT E-..BkPCK, CLERK COLLIER CO Y, F I By All" t �4�F ,1o,Oiair'waA't JAM N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN S i9�+tt�irllr lily. Approved as to form and le al 'ency�7 77 RObERTZA,CnARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No: 30733080008 * ** 2940499 OR; 2990 PG; 0190 RBCORDID in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:20AN DWIGHT I. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 Retn: COFIBS 1,00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 47H FLOOR 1 6 4 E %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Trevino, Guadalupe 1301 Apple St Eden Park Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 14" day of September 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Six Dollars and Seventy Two Cents ($106.72), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: EDEN PARK 1ST ADD BLK 12 LOT 2 OR 1569 PG 1312 Folio No. 30733080008 Project No. 64000 Account No. 5995 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this aG,tt day of ��, 2002. AtTEST: Qt bwtGHT E- BROCK, CLERK att�xt, a: tv G�itrnan'= s i ��iri� pproved *� a ho form and le al ncy R013ERT Z461ARY MAID 0 1 p:�i�� r r • This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No: 36111960003 * ** 2940500 OR; 2990 PG; 0191 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:20AK DWIGHT S. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C4 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BKT 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Mostafa, Mokhtar =& Mirta 486622 n, PL SW Naples, FL 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14`" day of September 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirty Seven Cents ($104.37), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 4 BLK 120 LOT 10 OR 1098 PG 1743 Folio No. Project No. Account No 36111960003 64000 7883 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this,zG,46 day of ZI, , 2002. IC E; ATTEST: _0V1/IGHT E. CROCK, CLERK ,I�t est �s ab' Chi i ratan S igirratiirt Mly. Approved as to form and le al ' ncy �7 RO ER Y I ARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No: 52651160004 * ** 2940501 OR; 2990 PG; 0192 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:20AN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1,00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C4 EYT 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Agosto Et Ux, Carmelo C 206 81h St No Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 14th day of September 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Six Dollars and Seventy Two Cents ($106.72), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: JOYCE PARK BILK C LOT 3 OR 493 PG 507 Folio No. 52651160004 Project No. 64000 Account No. 16683 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thiscRG-t;t, day of --� J2002. At EST., , DWIGHT E`.tROCK, CLERK "La. �*ttest if"t� 6411rman'z s4g�,at� j:., Approv * h to form and I iency ROBERT C ARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No: 62258480009 * ** 2940502 OR; 2990 PG; 0193 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:20AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FBI 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BXT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN 16C4 "I KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: McDougal, Robert D 5310 Texas Ave Naples, FL 339620000 The Lien was recorded on the 14th day of September 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirty Seven Cents ($104.37), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES MANOR LAQKES BLK 10 LOT 5 OR 901 PG 1790 Folio No. Project No. Account No 62258480009 64000 21241 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisa6 � day of - .�.c,.. , 2002. ATTP,T: �E 1IVIGH*- "'I�.r_ BROCK, CLERK Atte ;t C141ruan': S.i gnatw"r, 1. �4pproveZI,.'9 to form :;Alfid I `al s cy ROi3E—R-1—z-A0KRY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No: 78570320006 *** 2940503 OR: 2990 PG: 0194 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:20AN DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BKT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN 16C4�'•� KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Rodriquez Jr, Raymond =& Lilia 302 S 9th St -18 Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 14th day of September 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred Thirteen Dollars and Forty Four Cents ($213.44), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: UTOPIA HOMES UNIT 1 LOT 8 OR 1815 PG 624 Folio No. 78570320006 Project No. 64000 Account No. 28037 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisa4 day of .,��. , 2002. DVIGHT BROCK. CLERK e At te>E ► k Ci►a f r�� , s s it""*A' j%s to form and lro�� ency 11-� R04BERT ZAeWARY- 'F vo,' :. '� • 11111541 . . . This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No: 35752520007 * ** 2940504 OR; 2990 PG; 0195 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:20AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 1 6 C 4 BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Boran Jr, Thomas K Thomas K =& Mary J Boran Sr 2191 SW 43' Ln Naples, FL 339400000 The Lien was recorded on the 14th day of September 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirty Seven Cents ($104.37), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 2 BILK 28 LOT 26 OR 1616 PG 1469 Folio No. Project No. Account No 35752520007 64000 6703 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and reco ding of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this4?4�t day of '2002. ATTE;ST:_ DuNIGFi'1`E. BROCK, CLERK 'Att "st .. i ia< 'id Chi irk - t '.; Approved ;a� to form r1d'a iency RO ER ARY BOARD OF COUNTY COM ISSIONERS COLLIER COU FLO A By JAME . COLETTA, CHAIRMAN 16C5 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 117 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIENS FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL THE 1995 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board of County Commissioners on August 1, 2000 adopted Resolution No. 2000 -236 authorizing the recording of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1995; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2000 -236, was recorded on August 8, 2000 in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273 of the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, which placed a lien on certain properties for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1995; and WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, requires the Board to approve by Resolution and record in the Official Records a Satisfaction of Liens on all accounts that have been paid in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County Ordinance 90 -30, as amended the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the 1995 Service Year Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Special Assessments for the following accounts numbered below, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. 2000 -236, whereupon a lien had been recorded on real property pertaining to the accounts identified herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts identified herein are hereby approved and the Chairman is hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, and the Clerk is directed to record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien individually in the official records of Collier County: Account No. 479 2940524 OR; 2990 PG; 0252 Account No. 589 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS Of COLLIER COUNTY, FL Account No. 754 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLBRK Account No. 1177 RIC FBI 10.90 Account No. 1261 COPIES 2.00 Account No. 1290 Account No. 3298 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR Account No. 3353 BIT 1240 Account No. 4750 Account No. 6172 Account No. 6460 Account No. 7333 * ** OR; 2990 PG; 0253 * ** Account No. 7 7935 This Resolution adopted thiso?64r, day of w-5- . 2002, after motion, second and majority vote. DATEU'�,FEB 2 6 2002 ATTEST: DWIGHT-E. 13ROCK, CLERK Ott at = to Chiti rown's stmt". M. Approved as to form and legal / D vid C. el County Attorney BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: 4-zta A -•-4 This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00071360009 * ** 2940525 OR: 2990 PG: 0254 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE COPIES Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FL 6.00 1.00 16C5 '14 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Santana, Benigno =& Mary Beth 3111 Westclox St Immokalee, FL 341422039 The Lien was recorded on the 8th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Five Dollars and Twenty Nine Cents ($105.29), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 31 46 29 BEG AT NE COR OF SEC, RUN W ALG N SEC LI 690FT TO POB, CONT W 200FT, S 220FT, E 200FT, N 220FT TO POB, LESS E 100FT .51 AC Folio No. 00071360009 Project No. 65000 Account No. 479 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Ffpraqlaj acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this r;5atisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this,?, day of .aY.c,�. , 2002. -At t?it at ''to `C` +airun's >af�ri�r� Mly. ATTEST BOARD OF COUNTY COKWISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COU FL O D JAM N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency R BERT Z RY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00074880007 * ** 2940526 OR; 2990 PG; 0255 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B, FROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Reta: CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C5 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Cruz, Margarita 1036 Ringo Ln Immokalee, FL 341422632 The Lien was recorded on the 8t" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred Ten Dollars and Fifty Eight Cents ($210.58), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 32 46 29 BEG SW CNR NW1 /4 OF NW1 /4 OF SE1 /4, THENCE N 349FT TO POB, N 71 FT, E 105FT, S 71 FT, W 105FT TO POB OR 1623 PG 2018 Folio No. 00074880007 Project No. 65000 Account No. 589 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and record)'ng of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this,&teay of ,-7`5, - , 2002. Attest U U, Chi i ratan ' s ATTEST: DWIGHT E.. BROOK, CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT 2;PICfiARY �061 10 -r • This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00081400001 * ** 2940527 OR: 2990 PG: 0256 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC Fig 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 1240 16 C5 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Lee, Albert=& Margaret M. PO Box 195 Immokalee, FL 341430195 The Lien was recorded on the 8th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Five Dollars and Twenty Nine Cents ($105.29), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 32 46 29 UNRECD LOT 23 DESC AS: COMM SW CNR SEC 32, ELY 490.55FT, NLY 1160FT, ELY 550FT TO POB, ELY 120FT, SLY 140FT, WLY 120FT, NLY 140FT Folio No. 00081400001 Project No. 65000 Account No. 754 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 4, *day of ,.sT,cd . , 2002. Attu U* �o Chii run 's A•TTE, T: DWIGHT E;7'BRbCK, CLERK t Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAC ,#RY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00099640002 * ** 2940528 OR; 2990 PG; 0257 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FBI 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1,00 CLERK TO THE BOARD � � ^ INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR C 5 B %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Anderson Sr, Curtis W =& Cheryl 2075 Sanctuary Rd Naples, FL 341204871 The Lien was recorded on the 8th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Five Dollars and Twenty Nine Cents ($105.29), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 24 47 27 E1 /2 OF NW1 /4 OF SW1 14 OF NE1 /4 5 AC OR 635 PG 1721 Folio No. 00099640002 Project No. 65000 Account No. 1177 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this*?Gaxday of ,��- , 2002. Attsst " to_CAalrabn -s s1pa•4Xhy ATTEST DWIGHT E. dk 6k, CLERK z Approved as ;t¢, form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAC7RY BOARD OF COIJJJTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO Y, FL ID , By: TAMP6 N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00108880009 * ** 2940529 OR; 2990 PG, 0258 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10 :32AN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD 1605 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR E %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Garza, Mario =& Herbey J PO Box 2647 Immokalee, FL 341432647 The Lien was recorded on the 8t" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Five Dollars and Twenty Nine Cents ($105.29), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 26 47 27 W1 /2 OF SE1 /4 OF SW1 /4 OF SW1 /4 LESS N & S 30FT 4.54 AC OR 1360 PG 555 Folio No. 00108880009 Project No. 65000 Account No. 1261 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisvj�.ztday of , 2002. Atte$t `,6, t "Chiirmn'i ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency RO ERT RY �/ �� dO This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00109840006 * ** 2940530 OR; 2990 PG; 0259 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/1002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FBI 6,00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD � 6C5 INTIROFFICI 4TH FLOOR EZT 9140 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Garza, Herby Jaime =& Maria Po Box 2647 Immokalee, FL 341432647 The Lien was recorded on the 8t" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Five Dollars and Twenty Nine Cents ($105.29), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 26 47 27 E1 /2 OF SE1 /4 OF SE1 /4 OF NE1 /4 5 AC. OR 891 PG 1255 Folio No. 00109840006 Project No. 65000 Account No. 1290 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thiso? day of A-1— , 2002. Attest as. io Chairum-S .:'ATTEST:- DWIGHT E..BROCK, CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAC • • V � AZ This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00764560006 * ** 2940531 OR: 2990 PG; 0260 * *A RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/1002 at 10:32AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6,00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BBT 7240 16 C5 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Flores, Juan =& Armandina P O Box 2727 Labelle, FL 339752727 The Lien was recorded on the 8t" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred Five Dollars and Seventy Eight Cents ($205.78), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 20 51 27 FROM N1 /4 CNR OF SEC 20, RUN S1186.16FT, N 89 DEG W633.43FT TO POB, N 100FT, S89 DEG E200FT, S 100FT, N89 DEG W20OFT TO POB .46 AC Folio No. 00764560006 Project No. 65000 Account No. 3298 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisp?_ txrday of , 2002. kttait ;'As' to lrnan's 31 714twt 041y. ATT9ST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS QWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER CO Y, FL ID JA N. COLE TA, cHATRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency Z� 11A RO ERT ZA9iVRY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00766960002 * ** 2940532 OR; 2990 PG; 0261 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AM DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C5 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Flores, Juan =& Armandina % Corina Samarripa 17009 Morgan Dr Naples, FL 341148925 The Lien was recorded on the 8th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and Eighty Nine Cents ($102.89), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 20 51 27 COMM Y4 CNR SEC 17 + 20, S 1651.21 FT, W 1173.93FT TO POB W 60FT N 135FT, E 60FT, S 135FT TO POB A/K /A UNREC LOT 29, BLUE HERON LAKE PARK Folio No. 00766960002 Project No. 65000 Account No. 3353 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaptiar of Lien, by action of the Board this may of .� , 2002. AtCirt •t 4 CAS 1 r'+�an' s -- ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY CO MISSIONERS DWIGHT E. QROtK, CLERK COLLIER CO JY, FL ID By JAM N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency l' ROBERT ZAqkARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 24981160003 *** 2940533 OR; 2990 PG; 0262 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B. BROCL, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C5 BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Astraitis, Edward M =& Gale D 1794 Holiday Ln Naples, FL 341044221 The Lien was recorded on the 8t" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and Eighty Nine Cents ($102.89), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: BROOKSIDE UNIT 3 PLAT 2 BLK F LOT 5 OR 1350 PG 289 Folio No. 24981160003 Project No. 65000 Account No. 4750 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this�ioday of r e~, , 2002. Attu m.to Chairman's s *atrre (Mly, n 4.. ATTEST: DWIGHT E, [ ROCK, CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAQWARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 30681480006 * ** 2940534 OR; 2990 PG; 0263 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at I0:32AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 COPIES 1,00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 1240 1 5 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Nunez, Micaela =& Pedro G 1421 Apple St Immokalee, FL 341422128 The Lien was recorded on the 8th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Five Dollars and Twenty Nine Cents ($105.29), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: EDEN PARK BLK 2 LOT 11 OR 1061 PG 707 Folio No. 30681480006 Project No. 65000 Account No. 6172 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfactiitxn,of Lien, by action of the Board this g�ttday of _�,�_• , 2002. Attest as to Chairma's OP444n ATTEST: DWIGHT E.- BRCzCK, CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZA ARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 30733080008 )k** 2940535 OR; 2990 PG; 0264 M RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, Ft 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTBROPFICI 4TH FLOOR B %T 1240 211i SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Trevino, Guadalupe Wisniewski, Leonard D 1303 Apple St Immokalee, FL 341422110 The Lien was recorded on the 8th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Five Dollars and Twenty Nine Cents ($105.29), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: EDEN PARK 1 ST ADD BLK 12 LOT 2 Folio No. 30733080008 Project No. 65000 Account No. 6460 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this.? l�*day of , 2002. Attest ac ': ,'F :Chalrun's 31y�stwY Nth jC;. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E�BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COU FLO A By: JAM . C L M, C HA'R PA N Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROI§ERT ZAC Y This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 35752520007 * ** 2940536 OR; 2990 PG; 0265 * ** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK ?0 THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4 ?H FLOOR 16C5 BIT 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Munoz, Aldo E =& Emelina 2191 43rd Ln SW Naples, FL 341166448 The Lien was recorded on the 8t" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and Eighty Nine Cents ($102.89), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 2 BLK 28 LOT 26 Folio No. 35752520007 Project No. 65000 Account No. 7333 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisd?ay of , 2002. Attest a .��ro Chairmn's S 1 g�atirre O�ir1 fir,, ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BRb -CK, CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZACHJAR This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 35988320000 * ** 2940537 OR; 2990 PG; 0266 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS Of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEB 6.00 Retn; COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 1240 1 6C5 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Stephenson, Marc E =& Mary E 2736 47th Ter SW Naples, FL 341167713 The Lien was recorded on the 8th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and Eighty Nine Cents ($102.89), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 3 BLK 88 LOT 3 OR 1630 PG 324 Folio No. 35988320000 Project No. 65000 Account No. 7935 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisaee- day of , 2002. A t1t#; os „ike Cha i r su ' s ATTEST: DWIGHTt. BROCK, CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency RO ERT ZACH 194 IVA This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 37697360003 !*** 2940538 OR; 2990 Pr.! 0267 M RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLERK RIC FIB 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK THB BOARD 16C5-,-,:. INTEROFFFF ICE B %T 7240 4TH FLOOR SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Gatt, Jeffrey A =& Monica L 28414 th St NE Naples, FL 341201336 The Lien was recorded on the 8th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and Eighty Nine Cents ($102.89), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 22 N 150FT OF 102 OR 1689 PG 1036 Folio No. 37697360003 Project No. 65000 Account No. 12548 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thiQ(gu�day of - ,� , , 2002. :Attest s j4 %,.Cha ll r san ' s ` s #gnatsine ea ��c. ATTEST: m' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT.E'. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COU FL0VbAA Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROEIERT ZAC44ARY �! — NAMES r. This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 37740200007 * ** 2940539 OR: 2990 PG: 0268 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBB 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR SIT 7240 `.. SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Gillings, Claudette L 1760 Wilson Blvd N Naples, FL 341202339 The Lien was recorded on the 8'" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and Eighty Nine Cents ($102.89), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 S 150FT OF TR 2 OR 1528 PG 888 OR 1555 PG 1396 -1404 Folio No. 37740200007 Project No. 65000 Account No. 12564 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this,?�=day of 45ZZ , 2002. Attest• ss :,*9 Chairman's sipatwo as :y. ATTEST`_ d:- DWIGHT F- BROCK, CLERK Aop' c&ve�d as to form and legal sufficiency ,/(� <� 1,C-4 .�7 RO ERT ZAC44A Y This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 38164320009 * ** 2940540 OR; 2990 PG; 0269 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 1 6 C 5 E %T 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Marzucco, Mark A 6020 Painted Leaf Ln Naples, FL 341167445 The Lien was recorded on the 8t" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and Eighty Nine Cents ($102.89), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 30 W 75FT OF E 180FT TR 51 Folio No. 38164320009 Project No. 65000 Account No. 13589 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this,&- -eday of c. , 2002. Att<es �lr, o .Chalroan' S sf�riatYrt ��,�• ATT.F -ST? 'DWIGHT. I9OCK, CLERK A'p' roved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAC • • • A This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 38335040008 * ** 2940541 OR: 2990 PG: 0270 * ** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS Of COLLIER COUKTY, FL 03/01/1002 at 10:32AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO TUB BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 1 6 C 5- ' SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Steigerwald, Donald T Elizabeth Ann Steigerwald 6007 Green Blvd Naples, FL 341164825 The Lien was recorded on the 8th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and Eighty Nine Cents ($102.89), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 33 E 105FT OF TR 51 OR 1218 PG 833 Folio No. 38335040008 Project No. 65000 Account No. 13958 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this.?4tAday of , 2002. Att4st - at .%* Chairman's 1i!ay• ATTEST: DWIGHT i*. BROCK, CLERK Aproved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAe1-1ARY • 0.4 • •� �- All . This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 52651160004 * ** 2940544 OR; 2990 PG; 0273 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS Of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/1002 at 10:32AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BKT 7240 16C5 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Agosto Et Ux, Carmelo C 206 N 8th St Immokalee, FL 341423762 The Lien was recorded on the 8th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Five Dollars and Twenty Nine Cents ($105.29), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: JOYCE PARK BLK C LOT 3 OR 493 PG 507 Folio No. 52651160004 Project No. 65000 Account No. 17815 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this,?G day of , 2002. Att*st i,t;.#q Chatriven -s ATTEST D WV W T E BR4 Cj K, C R�, � . ti Appeeved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAC,KARY 1 �- This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 53504360002 * ** 2940545 OR; 2990 PG; 0274 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTBROFPICB 4TH FLOOR IXT 7240 16C5 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Vinton, Maria H Pauline Sanchez 5119 Deer Run Rd Immokalee, FL 341422317 The Lien was recorded on the 8t" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred five Dollars and Twenty Nine Cents ($105.29), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LAKE TRAFFORD SHORES UNIT 1 BLK F LOT 10 OR 1175 PG 1945 Folio No. 53504360002 Project No. 65000 Account No. 18416 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and record'ng of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this o?4— day of , 2002. At,t JIO C-M i !so AT 'T. • DWI6HT1;EJBRQCK, CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAC4qARY IT -7 0 TAM91 Eel • • • • rip, This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 56404760000 * ** 2940546 OR; 2990 PG; 0275 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTBROFFICB 4TH FLOOR 16C5 EXT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Lee Et Ux, Albert PO Box 195 Immokalee, FL 341430195 The Lien was recorded on the 8t" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Five Dollars and Twenty Nine Cents ($105.29), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: MAINLINE BLK 5 LOT 20 OR 222 PG 993 Folio No. 56404760000 Project No. 65000 Account No. 19156 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and record' n9 of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 4 day of , 2002. Atta: -t� s%Ao Cha i rsa n' s ATTEST: DWIGHT E BROCK; CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAe9HARY ;I8 • a618111 g a WK4191 • Ewz This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 56405040004 *** 2940547 OR; 2990 PG! 0276 W RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEB 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 7240 16C5 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Arevalo, Jesus G =& Marie Cruz 406 Washington Ave Immokalee, FL 341423136 The Lien was recorded on the 8t" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Five Dollars and Twenty Nine Cents ($105.29), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: MAINLINE BLK 5 LOT 27 OR 543 PG 965 Folio No. 56405040004 Project No. 65000 Account No. 19185 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recor ing of this Satisfac#Qgt.gf Lien, by action of the Board this Z4 day of , 2002. Atilt at to, Chi rman' t ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ©WIGHT E. p�RbOIK, CLERK COLLIER COLIN FLO 5A C' By: JAMEZA C N Approved as to form and legal sufficiency RO ERT Z ARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 62258480009 * ** 2940548 OR; 2990 PG; 0277 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FIE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C5 BYT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: McDougal, Robert D 5310 Texas Ave Naples, FL 341137857 The Lien was recorded on the 8t" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and Eighty Nine Cents ($102.89), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES MANOR LAKES BILK 10 LOT 5 OR 901 PG 1790 Folio No. 62258480009 Project No. 65000 Account No. 22525 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thiso day of .�T , 2002. Attat io Chatrsan's J ATTEST-; DWIGHT ., BRQCK, CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAA-HARY • ..�. "Aim This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 63100120005 * ** 2940549 OR: 2990 PG: 0278 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C5 EKT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Newberry, Annie M 4810 Aztec Cir Naples, FL 341123710 The Lien was recorded on the 8th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and Eighty Nine Cents ($102.89), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES SOUTH UNIT 1 BLK 1 LOT 3 OR 1916 PG 1024 Folio No. 63100120005 Project No. 65000 Account No. 24002 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this oUtAday of 12002. Atte V .,Cha i i^san ' s , TTf :ST: `' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS -DWfGHT E. BRO X, CLERK COLLIER COUN FLOR 6A By. JAME C AI AN 'Apprdv, as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZACXAFZY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 64920520004 *** 2940550 OR; 2990 PG! ON M RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEB 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 1 6C5 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Lee, Albert=& Margaret PO Box 195 Immokalee, FL 341430195 The Lien was recorded on the 8t" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Five Dollars and Twenty Nine Cents ($105.29), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PALM EST N 85FT OF S 150FT OF LOT 6 OR 1012 PG 447 Folio No. 64920520004 Project No. 65000 Account No. 25153 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this @14ftday of .�. .• , 2002. 4, n Attejt: to' CKa1 roan s ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY CO ERMAN RS '- DWIGHT E. SRO ,'K, CLERK COLLIER COU Y, FL I ' JAM . COLETTA, C Approved as to form and legal sufficiency This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 66220080006 IQAA��'j 11101 �0Q Dry LJ'tvii U1%. Jjv rv. RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AK DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR IXT 7240 16C5 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Johnson, James W 226 Ohio Ave Fort Myers, FL 339054365 The Lien was recorded on the 8th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Five Dollars and Twenty Nine Cents ($105.29), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PEARCE SUBD BILK 1 S '/2 OF LOT 2 & ALL OF LOT 3 Folio No. 66220080006 Project No. 65000 Account No. 25742 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this&z% day of �.�.�. , 2002. Att* =t,- -A j4 Chi i rran ' s ATTt$T. DWII�HT E. BIRO K, CLLERK Appr6Ved as to form and legal sufficiency RO ERT ZA ARY 31L 10 P' 11561011 This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 68041640005 * ** 2940552 OR; 2990 PG; 0281 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, 03/01/2002 at 10:32AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK REC FBI COPIES Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN 16C5 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Hartigan Jr, Michael =& Deanna 2731 Poinciana Dr Naples, FL 341052753 The Lien was recorded on the 8th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Two Dollars and Eighty Nine Cents ($102.89), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: POINCIANA VILLAGE UNIT 1 BLK B LOT 25 OR 926 PG 1876 Folio No. 68041640005 Project No. 65000 Account No. 26725 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this,Zay of,c.�.. , 2002. Attoot 14, t ATTEST: --DWIGHT E. -B,RQreK, CLERK Appraved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZACHARY FL 6.00 1.00 This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 78570320006 * ** 2940553 OR; 2990 PG; 0282 * ** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS Of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:32AM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C5 B %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Rodriquez Jr, Raymond =& Lilia PO Box 1637 Immokalee, FL 341431637 The Lien was recorded on the 8t" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2707, Pages 3195 through 3273, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred Ten Dollars and Fifty Eight Cents ($210.58), plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: UTOPIA HOMES UNIT 1 LOT 8 OR 1815 PG 624 Folio No. 78570320006 Project No. 65000 Account No. 29230 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this.?GYtday of .� , 2002. Attest as to Chairman's i1p�i�rr.;.yr1y. :ATTEST: DWIGHT L BR OCK, CLERK 'Approved as,to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZACHARY BOARD OF COUNTY COMPAISSIONERS COLLIER CO U FL) D By: JAM . COLETTA, CHAIRMAN 16C6 RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 118 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIENS FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL THE 1996 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, the Board of County Commissioners on August 1, 2000 adopted Resolution No. 2000 -237 authorizing the recording of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1996; and WHEREAS, Resolution No. 2000 -237, was recorded on August 8, 2000 in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309 of the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, which placed a lien on certain properties for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1996; and WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended, requires the Board to approve by Resolution and record in Official Records a Satisfaction of Liens on all accounts that have been paid in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90 -30, as amended the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the 1996 Service Year Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Special Assessments for the following account numbered below, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. 2000 -237, whereupon a lien had been recorded on real property pertaining to the accounts identified herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts identified herein are hereby approved and the Chairman is hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, and the Clerk is directed to record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien individually in the official records of Collier County: Account No. 453 Account No. 1070 2940601 OR: 2990 PG; 0410 Account No. 1533 Account No. 1850 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS Of COLLIER COUNTY, FL Account No. 3340 03/01/2002 at 10:56AK DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Account No. 3463 REC FEE 10.50 Account No. 3942 COPIES 2.00 Retn: Account No. 4640 CLERK TO THE BOARD Account No. 6554 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR Account No. 6813 EYT 1240 Account No. 7786 Account No. 9072 Account No. 9412 Account No. 13945 Account No. 14795 Account No. 15066 Account No. 15419 Account No. 15749 Account No. 16230 Account No. 17792 Account No. 19606 Account No. 20048 Account No. 20145 Account No. 20556 Account No. 21050 Account No. 24303 Account No. 24853 Account No. 25399 Account No. 25564 Account No. 26547 Account No. 27313 Account No. 27410 Account No. 27614 Account No. 28228 Account No. 28888 Account No. 29227 * ** OR; 2990 PG; 0411 * ** 16C6 This Resolution adopted after this a&,tkday of , 2002 after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: FEB 2 6 2002 ATTEST: -DVVIGHT E - BROCK, CLERK Attist as to CMtirm"'= 31"atwo on 1'y. Approved as to form and legal suffici ncy: �7 David C. Weirgel County Attorney BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00072560002 * ** 2940602 OR; 2990 PG; 0412 **' RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AK DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6,00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICI 4TH FLOOR RXT 7240 16C6 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Fussell, Rodney W 3413 Westclox St Immokalee, FL 341422033 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty One Cents ($106.61) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 31 46 29 BEG AT NW COR OF NE1 /4 RUN E 60OFT TO POB, E 200FT, S 440FT, W 200FT, N 440FT TO POB 2.02 AC Folio No. Project No. Account No. 00072560002 66000 453 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisc24 day of , 2002. `V Chi l roan 's ATTEST: D . I HT,E.? By K CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency �7 ROBER HARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00099640002 * ** 2940603 OR; 2990 PG; 0413 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 47H FLOOR 16C6 B %T 7240 _. SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Anderson Sr, Curtis W =& Cheryl 2075 Sanctuary Rd Naples, FL 341204871 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty One Cents ($106.61) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 24 47 27 E1 /2 of NW1 /4 of SW1 /4 of NE1 /4 5 AC OR 635 PG 1721 Folio No. 00099640002 Project No. 66000 Account No. 1070 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaption of Lien, by action of the Board this oZ. day of �' , 2002. Atta t ai to' CA& i r man - s =1 a M1y : ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS °,DWIGHT E. 'BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COU FLO DA CO. By: JAM . MlrM, CHAMM;NN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROt3EWT ARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00130200000 * ** 2940604 OR; 2990 PG; 04 4 w RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 1 � � b EYT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Giddens, Vera 403 Taylor St Immokalee, FL 341423332 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty One Cents ($106.61) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 5 47 29 PAR DESC IN OR 36 PG 116, LESS N 5FT OF W 95FT, OR 821 PG 1399 Folio No. 00130200000 Project No. 66000 Account No. 1533 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this o?G day of 2002. Att Ott jt °- fo, Chi i roan -'S ATTEST: , BOARD OF COU TY COf1 ISSIONERS DWIGHT, E BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COL. FL 0'i Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZA ARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 36376320006 * ** 2940605 OR; 2990 PG; 0415 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS Of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C6 BIT 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Richard, Premise Rigaud Calixte 207954 th Ter SW Naples, FL 341166841 The Lien was recorded on the 8Th day of August, 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Twenty Six Dollars and Four Cents ($26.04) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 6 PART 1 BLK 209 LOT 31 Folio No. 36376320006 Project No. 66001 Account No. 1850 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this o526 day of 2002. Attaat -,W . Pha i roan' S sigt4#!'t oaT ATTEST: DwibHT E.. BR;O( ?K, CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAC^RY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO Y, FL I By: JA N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00764560006 * ** 2940606 OR; 2990 PG; 0416 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10 :56AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FBI 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLIRK TO THE INTEROFFICE BOA4TH FLOOR 16C6 BYT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Flores, Juan =& Armandina PO Box 2727 Labelle, FL 339752727 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred Eight Dollars and Twenty Six Cents ($208.26) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 20 51 27 FROM N1 /4 CNR OF SEC20, RUN S1186.16FT, N 89 DEG W633.43FT TO POB, N 100FT, S89 DEG E200FT, S 100FT, N89 DEG W20OFT TO POB .46 AC Folio No. 00764560006 Project No. 66000 Account No. 3340 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recor ing of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisoV, day of 12002. Attest, as to Chairman's s1. , eMIY. ATTEST: FT E. SROCK, CLERK e Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAC44MY BOARD OF COUNTY COM ISSIONERS COLLIER COU , FLO D By: JAM N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00766960002 *** 2940607 OR; 2990 PG; 0417 **! RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AK DWIGHT S. BROCK, CLERK REC FBI 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD � � C INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Flores, Juan =& Armandina % Corina Samarripa 17009 Morgan Dr Naples, FL 341148925 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 20 51 27 COMM' /4 CNR SEC 17 + 20, S 1651.21 FT, W 1173.93FT TO POB W 60FT N 135FT, E 60FT, S 135FT TO POB A/K/A UNREC LOT 29, BLUE HERON LAKE PARK Folio No. 00766960002 Project No. 66000 Account No. 3463 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this A6 day of , 2002. Aiiest ' it -.to Chairman's ATTEST:, BOARD OF COUNTY CO ISSIONERS DWIGHTIE.•BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COU FL O D JAM N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency RO ERT ZAC R This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 56406160006 * ** 2940608 OR: 2990 PG: 0418 RECORDED In OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT B. BROCI, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C6 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Partlow, Mirium E Ricardo Murrell 415 School Dr Immokalee, FL 341424127 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August, 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Seventy Nine Dollars and Ninety Six Cents ($79.96) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: MAINLINE BLK 6 LOT 32 OR 1463 PG 308 Folio No. 56406160006 Project No. 66001 Account No. 3942 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recor ing of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thiso34 day of , 2002. - Att *tt •g to Chatrsan's ATTEST:'-y BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWICtT E. BROCK, C&RK COLLIER COU By: JAM E". CO A N Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAC Y This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 24345002655 *** 2940609 OR; 2990 PG; 0419 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2001 at 10 :56AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FBI 6.00 Retn: COFIBS 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD � � � . INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 6 B %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: RICHEY Sr, David W =& Angela S 5100 19th Ct SW Naples, FL 341166212 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: BOCA PALMS OF NAPLES BILK A LOT 9 OR 1910 PG 1998 Folio No. 24345002655 Project No. 66000 Account No. 4640 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisv�G day of 2002. Attfit' -66' for Chairsan's s. Mly �4 ATItST: _ BOARD OF COUNTY CO MISSIONERS DWI HT E BR�OCK, CLERK COLLIER COU , FLO D By: JAM . COLETTA, CHA RMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZACWRY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 30682040005 * ** 2940610 OR; 2990 PG; 0420 **1 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10 :56AN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD � � n INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR r _ B %T 1240 V SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Nunez, Maricela 1401 Orange St Immokalee, FL 341422102 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred Thirteen Dollars and Twenty Two Cents ($213.22) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: EDEN PARK BILK 3 LOTS 1 + 2 Folio No. 30682040005 Project No. 66000 Account No. 6554 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recor ing of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisoZG day of , 2002. Attewt =st to Chairman's Si�stw't fly. ATTEST'' DWIGHT E.', BLOCK, CLERK e Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZACXA This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 30733080008 * ** 2940611 OR; 2990 PG; 0421 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS Of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD � � � �! � INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 6 BIT 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Trevino, Guadalupe Wisniewski, Leonard D 1303 Apple St Immokalee, FL 341422110 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred Thirteen Dollars and Twenty Two Cents ($213.22) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: EDEN PARK 1, ST ADD BLK 12 LOT 2 Folio No. 30733080008 Project No. 66000 Account No. 6813 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and record' g of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ,2 day of , 2002. A�ttsli 4s-,to Cha i rrman' s gi'� �jl1y• :ATTEST:' DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZACMK Y This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 35752520007 * ** 2940612 OR: 2990 PG: 0422 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AR DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD � � ^ INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR C 6 E %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Munoz, Aldo E =& Emelina 219143 d Ln SW Naples, FL 341166448 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 2 BLK 28 LOT 26 Folio No. 35752520007 Project No. 66000 Account No. 7786 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this z(. day of , 2002. 4Attatt, fit, Chairman's s j*itMI"tr May, ATTEST: = -a DyyiWT E-,-BR . K, CjR� Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZACH m-m] •�% • • - ■■�■►' //ice This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 36111960003 * ** 2940613 OR; 2990 PG; 0423 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C6 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR E %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Mostafa, Mokhtar =& Mirta 4866 22 "d PL SW Naples, FL 341166312 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 4 BLK 120 LOT 10 OR 1098 PG 1743 Folio No. 36111960003 Project No. 66000 Account No. 9072 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this .Z111 day of , 2002. AttRtt, ,as 'to, Cha i roan' s .ATTEST. DWIGHTE. URO K, CgER�, ��1, ..,.�,� -�' -. �. 'Appr6Ve`d as to form and legal sufficiency ROEIERT ZAC This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 36126040002 * ** 2940614 OR; 2990 PG; 04247 RECORDED A OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK REC FEB 6,00 Retn: COPIES 1,00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 47H FLOOR r B %T 7240 6 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Schlaupitz, Paul C 200048 1h St SW Naples, FL 341165734 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 4 BLK 140 LOT 2 OR 2044 PG 120 Folio No. 36126040002 Project No. 66000 Account No. 9412 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this,ZG day of , 2002. shot. 1"' Ch4 i rsan ' s ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWI HT E. =;,JBRU K, CLERK COLLIER COU FLO A By: JAM E64. COLET A, CHAI MAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency �7 ROBERT C This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 37740200007 * ** 2940615 OR; 2990 PG; 0425 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C6 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Gillings, Claudette L 1760 Wilson Blvd N Naples, FL 341202339 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 23 S 150FT OF TR 2 OR 1528 PG 888 OR 1555 PG 1396 -1404 Folio No. 37740200007 Project No. 66000 Account No. 13945 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida; acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this S4s— fa6ilo `of Lien, by action of the Board this z6 day of ..�_c,�.. , 2002. Attsirt �i to - Chi i 1114 ,;M �.• --ATTEST- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS �W' IGWK_E:.'B'ROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUN Y, FLO A JAM N Approved as to form and legal sufficiency RO ERT ZA ARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 38053360002 * ** 2940616 OR; 2990 PG; 0426 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEB 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 7240 1 6C6 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Davis Jr, Ronald J =& Mercedes 2120 39t" St SW Naples, FL 341176662 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 28 N 180FT OF TR 135 OR 1910 PG 1696 Folio No. 38053360002 Project No. 66000 Account No. 14795 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Spit faction of Lien, by action of the Board this ;V, day of .. , 2002. Atttit ns -Eo` Chi i roan 's iit+e inly`. ATTEST:" �' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS `,�'.DWIGHT`IE. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COU FLO D � By: JAM . COLE A, CHA MAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAC This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 38164320009 * ** 2940617 OR; 2990 PG; 0427 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AK DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR ,,y - r EYT 7240 16C6 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Marzucco, Mark A 6020 Painted Leaf Ln Naples, FL 341167445 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 30 W 75FT OF E 180FT OF TR 51 Folio No. 38164320009 Project No. 66000 Account No. 15066 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ;z(. day of , 2002. tt t aK. t* Chd irsan's FATTEST: -- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT-t. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNT , FLOR A LE By: JAM E10/ N Approved as to form and legal sufficiency �7 RO ERT ZAC This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 38335040008 * ** 2940618 OR: 2990 PG: 0428 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AK DWIGHT B, BROCK, CLERK RIC FBI 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C6 EXT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Steigerwald, Donald T Elizabeth Ann Steigerwald 6007 Green Blvd Naples, FL 341164825 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 33 E 105FT OF TR 51 OR 1218 PG 833 Folio No. 38335040008 Project No. 66000 Account No. 15419 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this.Z(I day of 2002. Att*K, #s,., is Chairman's ATTEST:. t)WIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Appfbved` as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAC BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COU Y, FLO k71D By: JAM N. COLE A, CHA~ MAN This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 38453920000 *** 2940619 OR; 2990 PG; 0429 W RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 1606 E %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Irizarry, Eddie =& Carmen 1191 Granada Blvd Naples, FL 341032503 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 35 W 165 FT OF TR 59 OR 1783 PG 1419 Folio No. 38453920000 Project No. 66000 Account No. 15749 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Safi#? rtion of Lien, by action of the Board this z(- day of , 2002. A>i: e>et ss > - Chairman's ATTEST:_., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWI HT;E. BROCK, CLER/nK� COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR A 9. By: JAME N Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZACH This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 39321880006 * ** 2940620 OR: 2990 PG: 0430 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10 :56AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFPICB 4TH FLOOR E %T 7240 1 6C6 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Welter, Frederick C =& Valerie 821 18" St NE Naples, FL 341203644 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 50 N 75FT OF S 180FT OF TR 20 OR 1564 PG 857 Folio No. 39321880006 Project No. 66000 Account No. 16230 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this zG day of 2002. Atttu ir'Man's ATTEST DW HT E. B v j , Q.LERK Approvedas to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZACH This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 44387840004 * ** 2940621 OR; 2990 PG; 0431 RECORDED iD OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10 :56AN DWIGHT E, BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 RetD: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BXT 7240 16C6 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Brown, Ronald Jackson PO Box 494 Copeland, FL 341370494 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 146 TR 79 OR 1464 PG 870 Folio No. 44387840004 Project No. 66000 Account No. 17792 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this .Z4. day of ..�_�G. , 2002. At' , t44t ; M to tl�s f ran ' s $,Igo �Aly.{< ATTEST;' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS - ,,, "DVI/IGIT E,,'BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNT , FLOR A JAMS Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZArKAAY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 52651160004 *** 2940622 OR; 2990 PG; 0432 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10 :56AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD � � C , INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 6 EXT 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Agosto Et Ux, Carmelo C 206 N 8th St Immokalee, FL 341423762 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty One Cents ($106.61) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: JOYCE PARK BLK C LOT 3 OR 493 PG 507 Folio No. 52651160004 Project No. 66000 Account No. 19606 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida.,,acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this 4tisf6 .61,bn of Lien, by action of the Board this 24 day of , 2002. �ttNt ,fo`C�air�n's :f9saws, lye; ATT4ST,� ;' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' 9WIGH`1-'E,BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COU By: JAM N Approved as to form and legal sufficiency :z 1A �7 ROBERT A Y This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 53501200000 * ** 2940623 OR; 2990 PG; 0433 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6,00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 6C6 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Vinton, Maria H 5119 Deer Run Rd Immokalee, FL 341422317 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty One Cents ($106.61) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LAKE TRAFFORD SHORES UNIT 1 BLK B LOT 14 OR 1133 PG 1237 Folio, No. 53501200000 Project No. 66000 Account No. 20048 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction, of Lien, by action of the Board this zG day of .._c �. , 2002. Attest at to Chairman's sigeet ^oily. ,y r -'ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGN -r E,. BF=K, CLERK COLLIER COUN , FLO A JAM N 'Approved,.,as'to form and 'lega'I sufficiency ROB RT ZAC RY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 53504360002 * ** 2940624 OR: 2990 PG: 0434 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FIR 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 7240 1 b C 6 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Vinton, Maria H Pauline Sanchez 5119 Deer Run Rd Immokalee, FL 341422317 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty One Cents ($106.61) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LAKE TRAFFORD SHORES UNIT 1 BLK F LOT 10 OR 1175 PG 1945 Folio No. 53504360002 Project No. 66000 Account No. 20145 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 26, day of 12002. A 1^ . C" ��'�, .Chi 1►�an' s s19Mtwe o�l;�. ATTEST:, BOARD OF COUNTY CO ISSIONERS DWIGHT F- BROCK, CLERK COLLIER C OZ11 , FLO D By: JAMS . COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZACH This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 55417000664 * ** 2940625 OR; 2990 PG; 0435 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT 8, BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6,00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C6 EXT 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Parker, Joyce 4915 Catalina Dr # H -31 Naples, FL 341126912 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LELY PINES CONDOMINIUM UNIT 3 APT 31 OR 1989 PG 1660 Folio No. 55417000664 Project No. 66000 Account No. 20556 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Sati,sfacti,Qn _of Lien, by action of the Board this ;ZG day of __, 2002. ,-Attest as to,.Chairman's s f�twrt. `qa Y. ATTEST:, .; BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ,- ,DWIGHT, E ;BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COU JAM . C N Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBLRTZACFJXRY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 56404760000 * ** 2940626 OR; 2990 PG; 0436 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10 :56AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 Retn: COFIBS 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C6 B%T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Lee Et Ux, Albert PO Box 195 Immokalee, FL 341430195 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty One Cents ($106.61) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: MAINLINE BILK 5 LOT 20 OR 222 PG 993 Folio No. 56404760000 Project No. 66000 Account No. 21050 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this Xr. day of '2002. 'Atteft, t to Chairman's ATTEST DWIGHT, E..9ROCK, CLERK =, approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT Zf CNARY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COU Y, FL ID By: JAM A, CHA RMAN This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 62150560108 * ** 2940627 OR: 2990 PG-0 0437 **1 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AH DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6100 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR E %T 1240 16C6 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Sanchez, Aristides H =& Ruth 5221 Warren St Naples, FL 341138746 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES MANOR ANNEX BLK 2 LOT 6 Folio No. 62150560108 Project No. 66000 Account No. 24303 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ;z(- day of , 2002. AtlMt` to Cha i reran' s signatrre .oal,�. ATTEST; %' BOARD OF COUNTY CONJMISSIONERS DWIGHT EIBROCK, CLERK COLLIER CO U FL ID JAM N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency RO ERT ZAC Y This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 62258480009 * ** 2940628 OR; 2990 PG; 0438 * ** RECORDID in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C6 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EBT 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: McDougal, Robert D 5310 Texas Ave Naples, FL 341137857 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES MANOR LAKES BLK 10 LOT 5 OR 901 PG 1790 Folio No. 62258480009 Project No. 66000 Account No. 24853 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this zG day of �' , 2002. At, *lt" r -ta Ch&irsan's TT ST; BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. "BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COU Y, FL ID By: JA N. A, CHATRIVIAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROB RTZACVAKY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 62570880002 * ** 2940629 OR; 2990 PG; 0439 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD � � ^ INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR C 6 EYT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Lagierska, Theresa 18508 Flamingo Rd Fort Myers, FL 339123317 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES PARK UNIT 2 BLK 17 LOT 32, LESS R/W Folio No. 62570880002 Project No. 66000 Account No. 25399 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this zG, day of . , 2002. Attest W to Chzirnan's ATTE S-T--11 .. p1NI HT! `Bi OCK, CLERK ApprYvq,o as�tb form and legal sufficiency K-W BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER :Z;4U,, By. JAM WN. COLET A, C H ATR MAN This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 62635120005 * ** 2940630 OR: 2990 PG: 0440 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10 :56AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE HOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR C B %T 7240 1 6 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Stead, A Kimberly 665 991h Ave N Naples, FL 341082229 The Lien was recorded on the 8Th day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES PARK UNIT 3 BLK 28 LOT 9 Folio No. 62635120005 Project No. 66000 Account No. 25564 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this day of-. , 2002. Attest s1,,tR Chairsan's S 1I Pat", A`1TE $T: . N, r Vy1 Mfi' E: BRO.CK, CLERK Ao roved as°to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZACHARY BOARD OF COU ,LSITY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER CO , FL ID By: JAM N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 63100120005 * ** 2940631 OR; 2990 PG; 0441 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR IXT 7240 16 C6 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Newberry, Annie M 4810 Aztec Cir Naples, FL 341123710 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES SOUTH UNIT 1 BILK 1 LOT 3 OR 1916 PG 1024 Folio No. 63100120005 Project No. 66000 Account No. 26547 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this XC day of ,� , 2002. Attest,, jjs t4 Chairman's �f #rre o� y� .'ATTEST: = �PWICHT E. BROCK, CLERK ,�.. �C-Q Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZACHAR BOARD OF COUNTY CO M ISSIONERS COLLIER COU , FLO D By: JAM COLETTA, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 63857880009 * ** 2940632 OR; 2990 PG; 0442 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 47H FLOOR BIT 7240 16C6 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Arevalo, Jesus =& Marie C 406 Washington Ave Immokaleee, FL 341423136 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty One Cents ($106.61) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NEWMARKET SUBD BILK 25 LOTS 7 -9 Folio No. 63857880009 Project No. 66000 Account No. 27313 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this .Z/, day of 12002. Atta 'io,. Chi i rxan - s s1gattm only.. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COU FLO D op By: JAME64. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency RO ERT ZAC Y This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 63910800007 * ** 2940633 OR; 2990 PG; 0443 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C6 B %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: James, Pamela 415 S 1st St Immokalee, FL 341424003 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty One Cents ($106.61) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NEWMARKET SOUTH BLK 2 LOT 9 & 10 Folio No. 63910800007 Project No. 66000 Account No. 27410 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this SatisfaOroi -of Lien, by action of the Board thisxG day of - -e-�. , 2002. Att!>it: ait Chairman's "Sty" oa1Y. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency RO ERT ZAC ARY BOARD OF COUNTY CO MISSIONERS COLLIER CO , FL ID By: JA N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 64920520004 * ** 2940634 OR; 2990 PG; 0444 * ** RBCORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLBRR ?0 THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C6 BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Lee, Albert=& Margaret PO Box 195 Immokalee, FL 341430195 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty One Cents ($106.61) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PALM EST N 85FT OF S 150FT OF LOT 6 OR 1012 PG 447 Folio No. 64920520004 Project No. 66000 Account No. 27614 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this z6 day of , 2002. to Chairman's ..'ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT' E._$R!OCK, CLERK COLLIER COU , FLO D By: JAM . COLETTA, CHAT MAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROIJERT ZAC RY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 66220080006 *** 2940635 OR; 2990 PG; 0445 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK RBC FIB 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD 1.b � 6 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR IXT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Johnson, James W 226 Ohio Ave Fort Myers, FL 339054365 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Six Dollars and Sixty One Cents ($106.61) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PEARCE SUBD BLK 1 S Y2 OF LOT 2 & ALL OF LOT 3 Folio No. 66220080006 Project No. 66000 Account No. 28228 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this zG day of -c4 , 2002. Attest as to Chairman's s 1 gaatw-e oa 1,y. DVjfIGHT . BRPCK, CLERK :Approved as'to form and; legal, sufficiency ROBERT ZACHARY BOARD OF COUNTY C MMISSIONERS COLLIER C TY, F RI By: JA N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 67390860304 * ** 2940636 OR: 2990 PG: 0446 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLBR% RIC FBI 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1,00 CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C6 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Lewandowski Jr, Donald E Annette V Lewandowski 975 Aqua Cir Naples, FL 341027416 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirteen Cents ($104.13) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PINE RIDGE 2ND EXT REP BLK B A PORTION OF LOT 2 NKA 4 -9 PELICAN RIDGE (HO) DESC IN OR 1244 PG 431 Folio No. 67390860304 Project No. 66000 Account No. 28888 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recor ing of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 2(. day of . �� , 2002. Attest as to Ch& i man , s S 1 g!'►4tW' M�1 y • ATTEST;: ra BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS IONERS `DWIO CLERK COLLIER COU , FL ID By: r JAM . COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Appfoved�essto form and leg a[-sufficiency - -/7z ROBrzRT ZA A This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 68041880001 ** 82940637 OR; 2990 PG; 0447 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS Of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 10:56AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 Retn: COPIES 1.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C6 B %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Greiff, James D =& Karen S 3282 Ponce De Leon Dr Naples, FL 341052849 The Lien was recorded on the 8T" day of August 2000, in Official Record Book 2708, Pages 0199 through 0309, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred Eight Dollars and Twenty Six Cents ($208.26) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: POINCIANA VILLAGE UNIT 1 BILK C LOT 2 Folio No. 68041880001 Project No. 66000 Account No. 29227 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recor ing of this Satisfacti©p of Lien, by action of the Board this z( day of , 2002. Attoit as to Cna�ra�an's ATTEST: w BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IDVVI� N 1" {E. F�-'K CL'ERK COLLIER COU Y, FLO IDA - �+,�.e% : By. JA AN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency ROBERT ZAC * ** 2940691 OR: 2990 PG: 0610 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL This instrument prepared by: 03/01/1002 at 11:24AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 Robert Zachary COPIES 1.00 Assistant County Attorney Retn: Office of the County Attorney CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C" 3301 East Tamiami Trail INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR A Naples, Florida 34112 B %T 7240 i (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00099640002 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Curtis W. Anderson SR & Cheryl Anderson RT 6 Box 1857 -A Naples, FL 33999 The Lien was recorded on 2A day of September 1994, in Official Record Book 001981 page 002368 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand One Hundred Seventy Dollars and No Cents ($1,170.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, LESS THE SOUTH 30 FEET THEREOF, RESERVED FOR ROAD PURPOSES, SAID LAND SITUATED, LYING AND BEING IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board -46 this G day of, --o , 2002. ATTEST: ..DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk � AUst as td Chat run's st w* only. Approved as to form and legal s iency - �- 7/ <�� . A R(JBEITZ ARY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: JAME COLETTA, CHA RMAN * ** 2940692 OR; 2990 PG; 0611 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS Of COLLIER COUNTY, FL This instrument prepared by: 03/01/1002 at 11:21AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FIB 6.00 Robert Zachary COPIES 1.00 Assistant County Attorney Retn: Office of the County Attorney CLERK TO THE BOARD 6C7 3301 East Tamiami Trail INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR Naples, Florida 34112 B %T 7240 _ (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 64920080007 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Philip Carlton Jr. 11950 SW 72 Ave Miami, FL 33156 The Lien was recorded on 9th day of March 1995, in Official Record Book 2037 page 0740 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred Forty Five Dollars and No Cents ($245.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PALM ESTATES N 82 FT OF S 118 FT OF LOT 2, N 85 FT OF S 110 FT OF LOT 7 OR 405 PG 505, S 15 FT OF LOT 10 OR 405 PG 505, LOT 11 OR 405 PG 505, LOT 14 OR 405 PG 505. Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this Z4 day of -,," , 2002. ;ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk ' Att et as to Chairman's SIOUA * 041y. Approved as to form and legal s ' cy ROBERT Z RY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: JAM N. COLETTA, *IRMAN This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00135440001 2940693 OR: 2990 PG: 0612 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 11:24AN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 10.50 COPIES 2.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR E %T 1240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN 16C7 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: J. B. Gadsden, Jr and Althea Gadsden 707 South 5th Street Immokalee, FL 33934 The Lien was recorded on 26th day of November 1991, in Official Record Book 001666 page 000964 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Five Hundred Forty Five Dollars and No Cents ($545.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST ONE -HALF OF THE NORTHEAST ONE - QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE - QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE EAST ONE -HALF OF THE NORTHEAST ONE - QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE - QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE - QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 200 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 4, PALMETTO PARK, A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO SAID WEST BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 236.07 FEET, THENCE EASTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 4, PALMETTO PARK, A DISTANCE OF 221.63 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO SAID WEST BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 436.52 FEET TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 4, PALMETTO PARK; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 300.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE PUBLIC OVER THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY PURPOSES. Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 24, day of , 2002. 6 C 7 OR; 2990 PG; 0613 ;ATTEST; BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, DWIGHT 1�. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 4.'d Attabt, tq Xhat`rman's By: SigllatW'! ea].,lt. JAMS . COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form an iency 1 ROBERT ZA HARY RBC 2940694 OR; 2990 PG; 0614 OFFICIAL RECORDS Ty' FL This instrument prepared by: 03/01/2001 at11:24ANDWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK Robert Zachary RBC FBI 10.50 Assistant County Attorney Retn: COPIES 2.00 Office of the County Attorney CLERK TO THE BOARD 3301 East Tamiami Trail INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16 C7 Naples; Florida 34112 BIT 1240 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00135440001 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: J.B. Gadsden, Jr & Althea 707S5 1h St Immokalee, FL 34142 The Lien was recorded on 3rd day of October 2001, in Official Record Book 2901 page 1767 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Three Hundred Ten Dollars and No Cents ($310.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST ONE -HALF OF THE NORTHEAST ONE - QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE - QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE - QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE EAST ONE -HALF OF THE NORTHEAST ONE - QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 200 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 4, PALMETTO PARK, A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET, THENCE SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO SAID WEST BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 236.07 FEET, THENCE EASTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 4, PALMETTO PARK, A DISTANCE OF 221.63 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO SAID WEST BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 436.52 FEET TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 4, PALMETTO PARK; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 300.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE PUBLIC OVER THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT -OF- WAY PURPOSES. Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 2G day of �.�r , 2002. 16C7 *** OR, 2990 PG, 0615 ATTEST:', BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLO IDA Att*ot N 1 By' s to: CAi1r� . �'s JAM COLETTA, CHAIRMAN lg�tirs Mly, Approved as to form �� and le al suf cy E RO RT ZACH This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00135440001 2940695 OR: 2990 PG: 0616 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 11:24AN DWIGHT 1. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 10.50 COPIES 2.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE INTEROFFICE EKT 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN BOARD 4TH FLOOR 16C7 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: J. B. Gadsden, Jr & Althea 707 S 5" St Immokalee, FL 34142 The Lien was recorded on 5t" day of July 2001, in Official Record Book 2853 page 2352 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Three Hundred Ten Dollars and No Cents (5310.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST ONE -HALF OF THE NORTHEAST ONE - QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST ONE - QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE - QUARTER OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 47 SOUTH, RANGE 29 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WEST BOUNDARY OF THE EAST ONE -HALF OF THE NORTHEAST ONE - QUARTER A DISTANCE OF 200 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 4, PALMETTO PARK, A DISTANCE OF 80 FEET; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO SAID WEST BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 236.07 FEET, THENCE EASTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 4, PALMETTO PARK, A DISTANCE OF 221.63 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO SAID WEST BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 436.52 FEET TO THE SOUTH BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 4, PALEMTTO PARK; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTH BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 300.60 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING, SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE PUBLIC OVER THE SOUTHERLY 30 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT -OF -WAY PURPOSES. Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this z- day of�.�. , 2002. 16 C 7 *** . OR, 2990 PG; 0617 * ** ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, DVJIGhTT E. BROCK' , Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Attest ss ;. Choi►'�an's TAM N. COLETTA- CHAIRMAN s igastory MIY. �2G,/oai Approved as to form and is cy ROBERT Z HARY This instrument prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 00135440001 2940696 OR; 2990 PG; 0618 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 11:24AM DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 10.50 COPIES 2.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN 16C7 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: J. B. Gadsden, Jr. and Althea Gadsden 707S.5 1h Street Immokalee, FL 33934 The Lien was recorded on 15th day of March 1990, in Official Record Book 001512 page 001907 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Four Thousand Nine Hundred Twenty Five Dollars and No Cents ($4,925.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: COMMENCING AT THE NW CORNER OF THE E '/2 OF THE NE 1/40F THE SW/40F THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 47 S, RANGE 29 E, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE W BOUNDARY OF THE E 1/2 OF THE NE '/4 OF THE SW/40F THE NE '/4A DISTANCE OF 200 FT; THENCE EASTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH THE S BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 4, PALMETTO PARK, A DISTANCE OF 80 FT; THENCE SOUTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO SAID W BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 236.07 FT, THENCE EASTERLY AND PARALLEL WITH SAID S BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 4, PALMETTO PARK, A DISTANCE OF 221.63 FT; THENCE NORTHERLY AND PARALLEL TO SAID W BOUNDARY DISTANCE OF 436.52 FT TO THE S BOUNDARY OF BLOCK 4, PALMETTO PARK; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG SAID S BOUNDARY A DISTANCE OF 300.60 FT TO THE P.O.B., SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE PUBLIC OVER THE SOUTHERLY 30 FT FOR ROAD RIGHT - OF -WAY PURPOSES. Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ZG day of _:,,;3re,& , 2002. 16 C 7 * ** OR; 2990 PG; 0619 * ** ATTEST. ` �;� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, DWIGHT E. 9ROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest/ iE' t0k►ilrtiafi'g By' _ipwtw*, JAM N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Approved as to form and legal sufficiency � -7 ROfBER-T ZA0ARY * ** 2940697 OR; 2990 PG; 0620 ** Property Folio No. 24370800000 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Albert & Margaret Lee P.O. Box 195 Immokalee, FL 33934 The Lien was recorded on 12th day of May 1994, in Official Record Book 001946 page 001353 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Five Hundred Fifty Dollars and No Cents ($550.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 27, BLOCK A, BONDURANT SUBDIVISION Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, d' ects execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this A& day of , 2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT, K BROCK, Clerk 9- Atti•t u t o tha i rman ' s S1V18tW* .oal j►. Approved as to form and le al ency ROBERT Z ARY COLLIER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, • RIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL This instrument prepared by: 03/01/2002 at 11:24AN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Robert Zachary REC FEE 6,00 Assistant County Attorney Retn: COPIES 1.00 Office of the County Attorney CLERK TO THE BOARD 3301 East Tamiami Trail INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 1 6C7 Naples, Florida 34112 E%T 7240 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 24370800000 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Albert & Margaret Lee P.O. Box 195 Immokalee, FL 33934 The Lien was recorded on 12th day of May 1994, in Official Record Book 001946 page 001353 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Five Hundred Fifty Dollars and No Cents ($550.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 27, BLOCK A, BONDURANT SUBDIVISION Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, d' ects execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this A& day of , 2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT, K BROCK, Clerk 9- Atti•t u t o tha i rman ' s S1V18tW* .oal j►. Approved as to form and le al ency ROBERT Z ARY COLLIER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, • RIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN * ** 2940698 OR; 2990 PG: 0621 ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL This instrument prepared by: 03/01/2002 at 11:24AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 Robert Zachary COFIBS 1.00 Assistant County Attorney Retn: Office of the County Attorney CLERK TO THE BOARD 3301 East Tamiami Trail INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 7 Naples, Florida 34112 BYT 1240 (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 24370800000 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Albert Lee & Margaret Lee P.O. Box 195 Immokalee, FL 33934 The Lien was recorded on 25th day of July 1994, in Official Record Book 001970 page 000693 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred Forty Five Dollars and No Cents ($245.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 27, BLOCK A, BONDURANT SUBDIVISION Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 4 ep day of � -a,& , 2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E.' ,BROCK, Clerk 9. C16 'Attest a$ td Cha irmaw s Approved as to form and 1 al 'ency R BERT Z RY JAMI'S N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN * ** 2940699 OR: 2990 PG: 0622 * ** Property Folio No. 24370800000 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Albert Lee & Margaret Lee P.O. Box 195 Immokalee, FL 33934 The Lien was recorded on 6th day of October 1994, in Official Record Book 1992 page 0441 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Five Hundred Fifty Dollars and No Cents ($550.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 27, BLOCK A, BONDURANT SUBDIVISION Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisoAL day of.7�r�, , 2002. ATTEST! ` DWIGHT 'E. B.ROCK, Clerk At-to W o to Chairman's siratwre ooly. Approved as to form v1 cy ROBERT ZAC AIRY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: JAMn N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL This instrument prepared by: 03/01/2001 at 11:24AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK Robert Zachary RIC FEB 6.00 Assistant County Attorney Retn: COPIES 1.00 Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR Z 6 C % Naples, Florida 34112 BIT 1240 V / (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 24370800000 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Albert Lee & Margaret Lee P.O. Box 195 Immokalee, FL 33934 The Lien was recorded on 6th day of October 1994, in Official Record Book 1992 page 0441 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Five Hundred Fifty Dollars and No Cents ($550.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 27, BLOCK A, BONDURANT SUBDIVISION Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thisoAL day of.7�r�, , 2002. ATTEST! ` DWIGHT 'E. B.ROCK, Clerk At-to W o to Chairman's siratwre ooly. Approved as to form v1 cy ROBERT ZAC AIRY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: JAMn N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN * ** 2940700 OR; 2990 PG; 0623 * ** Property Folio No. 62410960105 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: SteinburF & Milano, Inc. 5850 10` Ave. SW Naples, FL 34116 The Lien was recorded on 21St day of August 2001, in Official Record Book 2879 page 0140 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand Three Hundred Forty Dollars and No Cents ($1,340.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 19, BLOCK 3, NAPLES PARK, UNIT 1 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ?.P day of A4 12002. = :ATTEST: , DIWIGI`IT E. BROCK, Clerk Arto•t,� si�atw�e M�•ir�•s Approved as to form and le a ency OBE T VRY COLLIER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, • RIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL This instrument prepared by: 03/01/2002 at 11:24AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK Robert Zachary RSC FEE 6.00 Assistant County Attorney Retn: COFIBS 1.00 Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 6 C Naples, Florida 34112 E %T 7240 �J (941) 774 -8400 Property Folio No. 62410960105 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: SteinburF & Milano, Inc. 5850 10` Ave. SW Naples, FL 34116 The Lien was recorded on 21St day of August 2001, in Official Record Book 2879 page 0140 in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand Three Hundred Forty Dollars and No Cents ($1,340.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 19, BLOCK 3, NAPLES PARK, UNIT 1 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ?.P day of A4 12002. = :ATTEST: , DIWIGI`IT E. BROCK, Clerk Arto•t,� si�atw�e M�•ir�•s Approved as to form and le a ency OBE T VRY COLLIER BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, • RIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 n 2940378 OR; 2989 PG; 3339 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:16AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 10.50 Retn: COPIES 2.00 CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR IKT 1240 1 6 C SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Michael J. Kyle A single Whose mailing address is 110 Ocean Naples, FL 34114 Bearing the date of the 25th day of October, 1999, recorded in Official Record Book 2610 Page(s) 1132, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand One Hundred Eighty Dollars and No Cents ($1,180.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: THAT CERTAIN CONDOMINIUM PARCEL COMPOSED OF UNIT 99, WEST WIND MOBILE HOME ESTATES, A CONDOMINIUM, AND AN UNDIVIDED SHARE IN THE COMMON ELEMENTS APPURTENANT THERTO IN ACCORDANCE WITH AND SUBJECT TO THE COVENANTS, RESTRICTIONS, TERMS, AND OTHER PROVISIONS OF THE DECLARATION THEREOF RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 630, PAGES 1883 THROUGH 1932, INCLUSIVE, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND SUBSEQUENT AMENDMENTS THERETO. TOGETHER WITH THE USE OF MOBILE HOME ID #FLFL2AD163204476 & FLFL2BD163204476 FOLIO NUMBER: 81623960009 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs executio and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this Z.- day of_.�, , 2002. ATTES�:`' EWIGHT,E., BROCK, CLERK eat s to 'Ch iroan 's Sf y. Approved, as 'tc� form and legal suff R BERT ZA ARY 16C8 OR; 2989 PG; 3340 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI8tIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIbA,' AS,THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER,,, COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO,THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN .zGldv Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 * ** 2940379 OR; 2989 P0; 3341 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:16AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C8 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Ronald H. Bell and Jean O. Bell, Husband and wife Owners Mailing Address: 939 Rosea Court Naples, FL 33962 Bearing the date of the 18th day of May, 1994, recorded in Official Record Book 001955 Page(s) 001586, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Thousand Three Hundred Sixty Three Dollars and Ninety Cents ($2,363.90) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: THE EAST 80 FEET OF THE WEST 120 FEET OF THE WEST % OF THE EAST' /2 OF THE WEST % OF LOTS 25 AND 26, OF THE NAPLES GROVES AND TRUCK COMPANY'S LITTLE FARMS NO. 2, NAPLES FLORIDA AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 27, COLLIER COUNTY, RECORDS. FOLIO NUMBER: 61832560003 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer Distr,4ct, actingzthrough its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction,,d'Lien, by', , ction of't��:$oard this day of- .. _c& 2002. F ATTEST' ' [)WIGHT;E.'iBROCK, CLERK as to 3 f 9natorg - t 1 �p s Approved alsho form and legal suffioiesc�' —� BOARD OF COUNTY COMM18SIONEKS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS'THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THe"COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT,,,,,:,,. ` Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 * ** 2940380 OR; 2989 PG; 3342 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:16AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Reta: CLERK TO THE BOARD IHTBROFFICI 4TH FLOOR EYT 7240 16C8 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: George E. Belcher Whose mailing address is 251 Matecumbe Lane Naples, FL 34114 Bearing the date of the 14th day of August, 1999, recorded in Official Record Book 2584 Page(s) 0433, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand One Hundred Eighty Dollars and No Cents ($1,180.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: UNIT NO. 67, WEST WIND MOBILE HOME ESTATES, A CONDOMINIUM AS FULLY SHOWN IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 630, PAGES 1883 THROUGH 1932, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TOGETHER WITH ALL UNDIVIDED INTERESTS IN THE COMMON ELEMENTS OR SURPLUSES ACCRUING TO BE SAID PROPERTY. FOLIO NUMBER: 81622680005 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by ,�adtib'r4wf the Board this v6. day of . 2002. .; ATTEST: �'DWIGHT E.J3ROCK, CLERK f aw to chi' raaan ' s s tg�atrre 001y. Approved as to form and legal suffi /cie l ROBERT ZA H RY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF.THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 2940381 OR; 2989 PG; 3343 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:16AK DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 10.50 COPIES 2.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EYT 7240 16C8 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Coastal Crane Service & Equipment, Inc., a Florida corporation Owners Mailing Address: 3763 Prospect Avenue Naples, FL 33942 Bearing the date of the 27th day of October, 994, recorded in Official Record Book 1999 Page(s) 0110, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of Three Thousand Three Hundred Fifty Dollars and No Cents ($3,350.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PARCEL A: THE SOUTH % OF THE EAST % OF THE SOUTHWEST' /4 OF THE NORTHEAST'/40F THE SOUTHWEST/40F SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND PARCEL B: THE EAST 132 FEET OF THE SOUTH' /2 OF THE WEST % OF THE SOUTHWEST' /4 OF THE NORTHEAST' /4 OF THE SOUTHWEST' /4 OF SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE EASTERLY 310 FEET THEREOF, OF PARCEL A AND B COMBINED. FOLIO NUMBER: 00271840002 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 4 day of 2002. �R ACES.T. DWIGHT E. BROCK ; CLERK kttesc .�L: .��r�rwan's _A" 014form and legal s ROBERT ZAtFfARY OR: 2989 PG: 3344 16C8 f BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT JAM N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN OVA 4 /oX., Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 * ** 2940382 OR; 2989 PG; 3345 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:16AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FBI 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BBT 7240 16C8 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: William H. Bracken, A married man and Gregory B. Howard, A married man Owners mailing address 339527 th Avenue S.W. Naples, FL 33964 Bearing the date of the 27th day of October, 994, recorded in Official Record Book 1999 Page(s) 0094, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of Three Thousand Three Hundred Fifty Dollars and No Cents ($3,350.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: THE EAST % OF THE NORTH 329.30 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1,347.20 FEET OF THE WEST % OF THE WEST'/20F THE EAST' /z OF THE NORTHWEST' /. OF SETION 36, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 00278080001 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 2 G day of 2002. R „,1) ATTEST: DWIGHT E; BF�QCK, CLERK -fit �t aft C” 1 man ' s 31 nrtt �:� A pro��tt as tc form and legal sufficient BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER - SEWED DISTRICT dllillf�" ROBERT ZACHARY JA114?S N. COLE A, CH RMAN Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 * ** 2940383 OR; 2989 PG; 3346 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/0112002 at 09 :16AK DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR E%T 7240 16C8 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: John C. Bigham 5326 Dixie Drive Naples, FL 33962 Bearing the date of the 23rd day of July, 1992, recorded in Official Record Book 1738 Page(s) 000556, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand Two Hundred Fifty Nine Dollars and sixty Six Cents ($1,259.66) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 13, BLOCK 6, UNIT 1, NAPLES MANOR, PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 57, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 62042760003 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of,Lieg4 by action of the Board this _Z6. day of 2002. '' /I '' 11 ? - A'�1E5``i • !. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E,,5ROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER e COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE Fh GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER s tftil"!fi COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT 'Apppved:as form and legal 'td E't," uuuu S� ROBERT zAofiARY JAMtt N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 * ** 2940384 OR; 2989 PG; 3347 * ** RICORDBD in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/0112002 at 09:16AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FBI 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C8 8YT 7240 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Justin Monpremier, A married man 5221 Collins Street Naples, FL 33962 Bearing the date of the 14th day of July, 2000, recorded in Official Record Book 2766 Page(s) 0839, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of Three Thousand Seven Hundred Seventy Seven Dollars and No Cents ($3,777.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 5, BLOCK 8, NAPLES MANOR, UNIT 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 57, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 62044360003 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by actiQp,,q f the Board this ;Z day of .�' 2002. ti :L`)V1lIGHT,E. FROCK, CLERK A t st 10 -16 Chaiman-S Approved as fro form and legal sufficiency: �7 ROBERT ZAqKkKY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR&'_AgS rHE` GOVERNING BODY OF CDLLIEf:f COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE' , GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 * ** 2940385 OR; 2989 PG; 3348 **1 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:16AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC PBB 6,00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 8 BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Lloyd G. Sheehan Whose mailing address is 5600 Trail Blvd Naples, FL 33963 Bearing the date of the 12th day of December, 1994, recorded in Official Record Book 2011 Page(s) 1713, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Thousand Nine Hundred Four Dollars and Sixteen Cents ($1,904.16) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 5, BLOCK 10, NAPLES MANOR LAKES, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 86, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 62258480009 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 7-G day of , 2002. ATTEST: [)WIGHT E.'9ROCK, CLERK ' 00 4t0st is. U Chairman's t "idea' Worm and legal sufficiencv: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLOREbA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER , COUNTY AND AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF -THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT ROBERT ZACFH'ARY JAMS N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 * ** 2940386 OR; 2989 PG; 3349 * ** RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:16AH DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FEB 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR B %T 7240 16C8 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Ettore Mancini Whose mailing address is 4123 Cindy Avenue Naples, FL 34112 Bearing the date of the 14th day of April, 1997, recorded in Official Record Book 2305 Page(s) 1921, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Thousand Forty Dollars and Two Cents ($2,041.02) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 41, HEIGHLAND VILLAS, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGE 2, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS DESCRIBED IN THAT DOCUMENT RECORDED IN OR BOOK 1705, PAGE 379 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 49481480006 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this zG day of.c , 2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. `8;ROCK, CLERK At i at ta- Cha i rman ' s ved as to form and legal sufficienc R(JIBERt ZAP114KRY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORfDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER . I , COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE,,,,", GOVERNING BOARD OFT-HE,COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT JAMES N. COLETTA, CRA- IRMAN Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 * ** 2940387 OR; 2989 PG; 3350 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:16AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RIC FBI 6,00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C8 BIT 7240 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Michele Diane Holm Owners mailing address 9350 Fleming Grant Road Micco, FL 32976 Bearing the date of the 4th day of November, 1994, recorded in Official Record Book 2002 Page(s) 0987, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Five Dollars and Sixty Five Cents ($2,845.65) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOTS 36 AND 37 NAPLES BAYVIEW ADDITION NO. 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 20, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 61380920001 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs executi n and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by pcfio'6�df the Board this 2C. day of _.;U. 2002. ATTEST BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT =. BLOCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER „ r✓/L COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO''THE00�'� GOVERNING BOARD OF7HE COLLIER art'f0 Chairman's COUNTY WATER -SEWER Q(§TRICT Ap�p±oved as��orform and legal suffi ROBER HARY JA N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 * ** 2940388 OR; 2989 PG; 3351 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09 :16AK DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR 16C8 11T 7240 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Salomon J. Cardenas 501 Goodlette Rd N, C -109 Naples, FL 33940 Bearing the date of the 3rd day of August, 1992, recorded in Official Record Book 1742 Page(s) 000009, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Thousand Eight Hundred Forty Four Dollars and Seventy Eight Cents ($2,844.78) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOTS 4 & 5, BLOCK 2, AMENDED PLAT OF NAPLES MANOR EXTENSION, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 101, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 62200320007 & 62200360009 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs executio5 and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this .Z6 day of , 2002. iAT'f5`: = DWIGHT,E. afaQCK, CLERK Welt it �a �Fi� i ►man ' s i utiform and legal 7sufficien R b ER RY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS,' COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 * ** 2940389 OR; 2989 PG; 3352 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:16AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK RBC FIE 6.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 8 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: Valley Mortgage & Investment Corp. A Virginia Corporation 290014 1h St N #5 Naples, FL 33940 Bearing the date of the 25th day of July, 1995, recorded in Official Record Book 2083 Page(s) 0901, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of One thousand Three Hundred Forty Dollars and No Cents ($1,340.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LOT 12, COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK, PHASE I -A, AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13, PAGES 55 -56, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS DESCRIBED IN THAT DOCUMENT RECORDED IN OR BOOK 1140, PAGE 1845 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. FOLIO NUMBER: 27130440005 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ,2(. day of .� , 2002. ATT T: ,,D9VI HY ,.,BROCK, CLERK L^ ". N it At -40 `Cha 1 rman ' S Approve , as�jb form and legal ROBERT ZAj2rHAAY BOARD OF COUNTY COMM,61ONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN Prepared by: Robert Zachary Assistant County Attorney Office of County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774 -8400 940390 OR; 2989 PG; 3353 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/01/2002 at 09:16AK DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK RIC FIB 10.50 COPIES 2.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD 16C8 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR I %T 7240 SATISFACTION OF NOTICE OF PROMISE TO PAY AND AGREEMENT TO EXTEND PAYMENT OF WATER AND /OR SEWER SYSTEM IMPACT FEE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT, was the owner and holder of a certain Agreement with the following: William A. Leverick, A single man and Kathleen L. Leverick, A single woman Whose mailing address is P.O. Box 420001 Naples, FL 33942 Bearing the date of the 12th day of December, 1994, recorded in Official Record Book 2011 Page(s) 1688, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, which Agreement imposes a lien on the subject real property. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Thousand Two Hundred Fourty Dollars and No Cents ($2,240.00) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: COMMENCING AT THE WEST/4 CORNER OF SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE ALONG THE EAST AND WEST' /4 LINE OF SAID SECTION 11, AS SURVEYED NORTH 89" 30'40", EAST 1987.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 24' 17" WEST, 1586.29 FEET FOR A PLACE OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG THE LAST DESCRIBED COURSE, 80.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 890 28'18" EAST, 165.00 FEET TO THE CENTERLINE OF A ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID CENTERLINE SOUTH 00 24' 17" EAST, 80.35 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 890 35'43" WEST 165.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. FOLIO NUMBER: 00247120002 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, and the Collier County Water -Sewer District, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels the Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, and as Ex- Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water -Sewer District, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this 04 day of ATT S1V DWIGHTI�; BROCK, CLERK A�t�it `aS* Chairmad's .'`)I vM' as�?o form and legal suffic' R d B E R-T Z HARY 16C8 * ** OR: 2989 PG: 3354 * ** r. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX- OFFi.CIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER -SEWER DISTRICT JAMt-Pto" AN.COL&ETTA,CHAIRMAN 16C 9 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 1, 2002 16C11 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 1, 2002 16C12 MEMORANDUM Date: February 27, 2002 To: Ron Dillard, Senior Project Manager Public Utilities Engineering Department From: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Memorandum of Agreement Between the State of Florida, Department of Transportation and the State of Florida, Department of Insurance, Division of Treasury (US 41 road widening from Myrtle Road to Old US 41) Enclosed please find four original documents, as referenced above, approved by the Board of County Commissioners on February 26, 2002 (Agenda Item #16C12). Kindly forward the agreements to the appropriate agencies and return one fully executed original to Minutes and Records. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 774 -8406. Thank you. Enclosures 1 350 - 020 -300 i 6C1. 2 03/15/01 Page 1 of 2 MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this ZC. , day of , 200 L by and between the State of Florida, Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as "FDOT" and the State of Florida, Department of Insurance, Division of Treasury, hereinafter referred to as "Treasury" and ( Participant ), hereinafter referred to as the "Participant "._ WITNESSETH WHEREAS, "FDOT" is currently constructing the following project: Main Financial Project No.: 03010 - 6568/6570 (195380 -1 -5601 & 195378 -1 -5601) County: Collier hereinafter referred to as the "Project ". WHEREAS, FDOT and the Participant entered into a Locally Funded Agreement dated _December 1_, 1998, wherein FDOT agreed to perform certain work on behalf of the Participant in conjunction with the Project. WHEREAS, the parties to this AGREEMENT mutually agreed that it would be in the best interest of the FDOT and the Participant to establish an interest bearing escrow account to provide funds for the work performed on the Project on behalf of the Participant by the FDOT. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the covenants contained herein, the parties agree to the following: 1. An initial deposit in the amount of $ 275,960.62 (Two Hundred Seventy Five Thousand Nine Hundred Sixty dollars and Sixty Two Cents) will be made by the Participant into an interest bearing escrow account established by the Department for the purposes of the project. Said escrow account will be opened with the Department of Insurance, Division of Treasury, Bureau of Collateral Securities on behalf of the FDOT upon receipt of this Memorandum of Agreement. Such account will be an asset of FDOT. 2. Other deposits will be made only by the Participant as necessary to cover the cost of additional work prior to the execution of any Supplemental Agreements or Amendments. C12 35003/15/00 1 03/15/01 Page 2 of 2 3. All deposits shall be made payable to the Department of Insurance, Revenue Processing and mailed to the FDOT Office of Comptroller for appropriate processing at the following address: Florida Department of Transportation Office of Comptroller 3717 Apalachee Parkway, Suite E Mail Station 24 Tallahassee, Florida 32311 ATTN: LPA Coordinator 4. The FDOT's Comptroller or designee(s) shall be the sole signatories on the escrow account with the Department of Insurance and shall have sole authority to authorize withdrawals from said account. 5. Unless instructed otherwise by the parties hereto, all interest accumulated in the escrow account shall remain in the account for the purposes of the project as defined in the LFA. 6. The Treasurer agrees to provide written confirmation of receipt of funds to the FDOT. 7. The Treasurer's Office further agrees to provide periodic reports to the FDOT. STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION COMPTROLLER Attest as to Chairlan', LMM ,..pproved as to form & l-gal cuff tiwy Aw%tant County Attorney STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF INSURANCE DIVISIO F TR S Y PA ICIPANT SIGNATURE °�- James N. Coletta, Chairman PARTICIPANT NAME & TITLE 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 PARTICIPANT ADDRESS 59- 6000 -558 FEDERAL EMPLOYER I.D. NUMBER 16C15 RESOLUTION NO. 2002,119 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AUTHORIZING DECLARATIONS OF OFFICIAL INTENT UNDER U.S. TREASURY REGULATIONS WITH RESPECT TO REIMBURSEMENTS FROM NOTE AND BOND PROCEEDS OF TEMPORARY ADVANCES MADE FOR PAYMENTS PRIOR TO ISSUANCE, AND RELATED MATTERS. WHEREAS, United States Treasury Regulations § 1.150 -2 (the "Reimbursement Regulations ") prescribe conditions under which proceeds of bonds, notes or other obligations ( "Bonds ") used to reimburse advances made for capital and certain other expenditures ( "Original Expenditures ") paid before the issuance of such Bonds will be deemed to be expended (or properly allocated to expenditures) for purposes of Sections 103 and 141 -150 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code "), upon such reimbursement so that the proceeds so used will no longer be subject to requirements or restrictions under those sections of the Code; and WHEREAS, certain provisions of the Reimbursement Regulations require that there be a Declaration of Official Intent not later than 60 days following payment of the Original Expenditures expected to be reimbursed from proceeds of Bonds, and that the reimbursement occur within certain prescribed time periods after an Original Expenditure is paid or after the property resulting from that Original Expenditure is placed in service; and WHEREAS, Collier County wishes to take steps to comply with the Reimbursement Regulations; NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County (the `Borrower ") as follows: Section 1. Definitions. The following definitions apply to the terms used herein: "Authorized Officer," means the Administrator of Public Utilities or any person designated for the purpose by the Administrator of Public Utilities. "Declaration of Official Intent" means a declaration of intent, in the form, manner and time contemplated in the Reimbursement Regulations, that the advances for expenditures referred to therein are reasonably expected to be reimbursed from the proceeds of Bonds to be issued after those expenditures are paid. "Reimbursement" or "reimburse" means the restoration to the Borrower of money temporarily advanced from its own funds and spent for Original Expenditures before the issuance of the Bonds, evidenced in writing by an allocation on the books and records of the Borrower that shows the use of the proceeds of the Bonds to restore the money advanced for the Original Expenditure. "Reimbursement' or "reimburse" generally does not include the refunding or retiring of Bonds previously issued and sold to, or borrowings from, unrelated entities. 16C15 Section 2. Authorization and Requirement of Declarations of Official Intent. Each Authorized Officer is authorized to prepare and sign Declarations of Official Intent in substantially the form attached with respect to Original Expenditures to which the Reimbursement Regulations apply, to be made from money temporarily advanced and that is reasonably expected to be reimbursed (in accordance with applicable authorizations, policies and practices) from the proceeds of Bonds, to make appropriate reimbursement and timely allocations from the proceeds of the Bonds to reimburse such prior expenditures, and to take any other actions as may be appropriate, all at the times and in the manner required under the Reimbursement Regulations in order for the reimbursement to be treated as an expenditure of such proceeds for purposes of Sections 103 and 141 to 150 of the Code. No advance from any fund or account or order for payment may be made for Original Expenditures (other than expenditures excepted from such requirement under the Reimbursement Regulations) that are to be reimbursed subsequently from proceeds of Bonds unless a Declaration of Official Intent with respect thereto is made within the time required by the Reimbursement Regulations. PASSED AND ADOPTED this zG,e day of .� , 2002 after majority vote in favor of adoption. ATTW: 6'wight .$rock, Clerk eputy�Clerk ` Attittt 'of to cmils"'f Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: 61.., (7 Tom Palmer, Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMNIONERS * , COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS EX- OFFICO THE GOVERNING BOARD' OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER SEWER DIST f BY: 1iva.., ti JAMES N. COLETTA, Chairman 16C15 DECLARATION OF OFFICIAL INTENT For Reimbursement of Expenditures from Bonds/Notes This is a Declaration of Official Intent under U.S. Treasury Regulations for purposes of Sections 103 and 141 to 150 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code "). 1. The undersigned, on behalf of Collier County (the `Borrower ") declares that the Borrower reasonably expects that the capital and other expenditures described in paragraph 2 (the "Project") will be reimbursed with the proceeds of "bonds" (as defined in Section 150 of the Code). The maximum principal amount of bonds expected to be issued for the Project is $8,258,000. 2. Description of capital and other expenditures to be reimbursed. Expenditures for (insert a general functional description of property, project, program or purpose): Water Pollution Control Improvements The undersigned has been authorized by the Borrower to make and sign this Declaration on behalf of the Borrower. Date of Declaration: Collier County 2002 j //�� By Ia PD2�&LUo (Signature) Tom Wides, Interim Administrator- Public Utilities Caution: This Declaration of Official Intent will not be effective unless the bonds providing moneys for the reimbursement are issued and the reimbursement for the Project described above is made (by an allocation on the books and records identifying the expenditures as in paragraph 2 above) within the applicable period prescribed in the Treasury Regulations — generally, 18 months after the later of the date of the expenditure or the date the Project is placed in service, but in no event later than three years after the date of the expenditure. 16C16 1 MEMORANDUM Date: February 28, 2002 To: Tom Wides, Administrator Public Utilities From: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Disaster Relief Funding Agreement Contract No. 02- RM- *2- 09 -21 -20 -017 Enclosed please find the original document, as referenced above (Agenda Item #16C16), approved by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2002. Kindly forward the agreement to DCA and return the fully executed original to the Minutes and Records Department. Thank you. Enclosure 1 6CI Florida Department of Community Affairs Contract No. 02- RM- *2- 09 -21 -20 -017 DISASTER RELIEF FUNDING AGREEMENT This Agreement is between the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs (the "Grantee ") and, Collier County public Utilities (the "Subgrantee "). This Agreement is based on the , existence of the following conditions: Tropical Storm Gabrielle had a devastating impact upon the State of Florida. The severity of the damage and losses resulted in a declaration of emergency by the Governor in Executive Order 01 -268. In consequence of Tropical Storm Gabrielle, the President of the United States declared Tropical Storm Gabrielle a major disaster in the following counties: Charlotte, Collier, DeSoto, Flacler, Manatee, Putnam, Sarasota, St. Johns, Hardee, Highlands, and Lee. The Public Assistance Program was made available to eligible applicants in the counties of Charlotte, Collier, DeSoto, Flacler, Manatee, Putnam, Sarasota, St. Johns, Hardee, Highlands, and !ee. The Agreement between the State of Florida and the Federal Emergency Management Agency governing the use of such funds re- quires the State to share the costs eligible for federal financial assistance, and the State has undertaken to shire those costs with its Subgrantees. A Budget Amendment has been prepared and is being considered to provide for the necessary funds and authority for this event. 1 ti 16C16 Under the Emergency Management Act, as amended, the Department has authority to administer federal financial assistance from the Agency consequent to a presidential declaration of disaster. Based upon the existence of the foregoing conditions, the parties agree to the following: ARTICLE I. Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings unless another meaning is specified elsewhere: A. "Eligible activities" are those activities authorized in the FEMA -State Agreement, and in the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, Public Law 93 -288, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 5121 -5201; 44 C.F.R. Part 206; and applicable policies of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. B. "FEMA -State Agreement" is the agreement of October 4, 2001 between the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the e State of Florida, for Disaster No. FEMA- 1393- DR -FL. ARTICLE II. APPLICABLE Law. The parties agree to all the conditions, obligations, and duties imposed by the FEMA -State Agreement and all applicable state and federal legal requirements including, without any limitation on the generality of the fore- going, the requirements of 44 C.F.R. Parts 13 and 206, and the Policies of the Federal Emergency Management A $rency. ARTICLE III. FUNDING and INSURANCE. Grantee shall provide funds to the Subgrantee for eligible activities for the projects approved by the Grantee and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, as specified in the approved Project Worksheets. Page 2 2 16C 16 Allowable costs shall be determined in accordance with 44 C.F.R. Parts 13 and 206. A. The approved Project Worksheets shall be transmitted to Subgrantee, and shall state the cumulative funding allowed, the scope of the eligible project, and the costs eligible under this Agreement. Project Worksheets may obligate or deobligate funding, thereby amending the total amount of funding. The approved Project Worksheets shall document the total eligible costs and the total federal share of those costs, which shall be seventy -five (75) percent of all eligible costs. Contingent upon an appropriation by the Florida Legislature, the Grantee agrees to provide one -half of any non - Federal share for local government and Private non - profit Subgrantees. As a condition of receipt of the funding, and contingent upon an appropriation by the Florida Legislature where required, the Subgrantee similarly agrees to provide any non - Federal share not paid by the Grantee. 3. As a condition to funding under this Agreement, the Subrantee agrees that the Grantee may withhold funds otherwise payable to Subgrantee from any disbursement to Grantee upon a determination by Grantee or Federal Emergency Management Agency that funds exceeding the eligible costs have been disbursed to Subgrantee pursuant to this Agreement or any other funding agreement administered by Grantee. C. As a further condition to funding under this Agreement, the Subgrantee agrees to procure insurance sufficient for the type or types of hazards for which the disaster was declared to cover Page 3 3 16C16 any and all projects to be funded under this Agreement where insurance is available and reasonable. Subgrantee shall provide Grantee with a certificate of such insurance as a condition to funding under this Agreement. ARTICLE IV. DUPLICATION OF BENEFITS PROHIBITION. Subgrantee may not receive funding under this Agreement to pay for damage covered by insurance, nor may Subgrantee receive any other duplicate benefits under this Agreement. A. Subgrantee shall without delay advise Grantee of any insurance coverage for the damage identified on the applicable Project Worksheets and of any entitlement to compensation or indemnification from such insurance. Subgrantee shall reimburse Grantee without delay for any duplicate benefits Subgrantee may receive from any other source for any damage identified on the applicable Project Worksheets for which Subgrantee has received payment from Grantee, to the extent of any such duplication. B. In the event that Grantee should determine that Subgrantee has received duplicate benefits, by its execution of this Agreement the Subgrantee gives Grantee or the Comptroller of the State of Florida the authority to set off the sum of any such duplicate benefits by withholding it from any other funds otherwise due and owing to Subgrantee. ARTICLE V. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND PERMITTING LAWS. Subgrantee shall be responsible for the implementation and completion of the approved projects described in the Project Worksheets in a manner acceptable to Grantee, and Page 4 4 16C16 in accordance with applicable legal requirements. The contract documents for any project undertaken by Subgrantee, and any land use permitted by or engaged in by Subgrantee, shall be consistent with the local government Comprehensive Plan. Subgrantee shall ensure that any development or development order complies with all applicable planning,, permitting and building requirements. Subgrantee shall engage such competent engineering, building, and other technical and professional assistance at all project sites as may be needed to ensure that the project complies with the contract documents. ARTICLE VI. Recruired Documentation Reviews and Insoectiors. Subgrantee shall create and maintain documentation of work performed and costs incurred on each project identified in a Project Worksheet sufficient to permit a formal audit comporting with ordinary, customary and prudent public accounting requirements. Upon the failure of Subgrantee to create and maintain such documentation, Grantee may terminate further funding under this Agreement, and Subgrantee shall reimburse to Grantee all payments disbursed earlier to Subgrantee, together with any and all accrued interest. A. Subgrantee shall submit the following documentation for Large Projects (the Small Project threshold f(ar this declaration is $50,600.00) : 1. A Request for Advance or Reimbursement conforming to the sample attached to this Agreement as Attachment A; 2. A Summary of Documentation Form conforming to the sample Page 5 5 16C16 attached to this Agreement as Attachment'B, which shall be supported by original documents such as contract documents, invoices, purchase orders, change orders and the like; 3. A request for final inspection; 4. A signed Project Listing upon the completion of all projects; and S. The Project Listing and Certification specified by . Paragraph B of this Article. B. For all projects, Subgrantee shall state on the Project Listing and Certification that all work was performed in accordance with this Agreement and the requirements in each Project worksheet, and shall state the date of completion. C. Grantee will inspect Small Projects by random selection, and will conduct the final inspections on Large Projects, to ensure that all work has been performed within the scope of work specified on the Project worksheets. Costs not within the approved scope of work shall not be reimbursed. ARTICLE VII. Cost Sharina. The federal share of the eligible costs specified in the Project Worksheets under this Agreement shall be seventy -five (75) percent of such costs and the nonfederal share shall be twenty -five (25) percent. As a condition of funding under this Agreement, the - Grantee shall pay fifty (50) percent of the nonfederal share and Subgrantee shall pay the remaining fifty (50) percent. Payment of all or a specified portion of the nonfederal share of such costs is contingent upon an appropriation defining the apportionment of the Page 6 6 16C16 nonfederal share. Administrative costs in addition to the Project Worksheets that are otherwise eligible under 44 C.F.R. Part 206 and do not require matching funds will also be funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. ARTICLE VIII. Payment of Costs Grantee shall disburse the eligible costs to Subgrantee in accordance with the following procedures. A. Grantee shall disburse the federal and nonfederal shares of the eligible costs for Small Projects to Subgrantee as soon as practicable after execution of this Agreement and formal notification by the Federal Emergency Management Agency of its approval of the pertinent Project Worksheet. B. Grantee shall reimburse Subgrantee for the federal and nonfederal shares of the eligible costs for Large Projects as soon as practicable after Subgrantee has delivered the following documents to Grantee: 1. A Request for Advance or Reimbursement Form conformina to the sample attached to this Agreement as Attachment A; 2. A Summary of Documentation Form conforming to the sample attached to this Agreement as Attachment B, which shall be supported by original documents such as contract documents, invoices, purchase orders, change orders and the like; and 3. A letter or notification certifying that the reported costs were incurred in the performance of eligible work. C. Grantee may advance funds under this Agreement to Subgrantee not exceeding the federal share if Subgrantee meets Page 7 7 the following conditions: 1 6C1-6 1. Subgrantee shall demonstrate to Grantee that Subgrantee has procedures in place to ensure that funds are disbursed to project vendors, contractors, and subcontractors without unnecessary delay; 2. Subgrantee shall submit to Grantee the budget supporting the request; 3. Subgrantee shall submit a statement justifying the advance and the proposed use of the funds, and specifying the amount of funds requested; 4. Subgrantee shall submit a completed Request for Advance or Reimbursement Form; and S. Subgrantee shall pay over to Grantee any interest earned on advances for remittance to the Federal Emergency Management Agency as often as practicable, and in any event not later than ten (10) business days after the close of each calendar quarter. D. Subgrantee may make improvements to the project facility in conjunction with its restoration of the facility to its predisaster condition in accordance with 44 C.F.R. Part 206 with the prior written approval of Grantee. E. In any case in which Subgrantee certifies to Grantee in writing that the restoration of a damaged public facility to its predisaster condition is not in the best interest of the public, Subgrantee may request Grantee and the Federal Emergency Management Agency to approve an alternate project in accordance with 44 C.F.R. Part 206 before the commencement of any work. Page 8 8 16C16 F. Grantee may, in its discretion, withhold its portion of the nonfederal share of funding under this Agreement from Subgrantee if Grantee has reason to expect a subsequent unfavorable determination by the Federal Emergency Management Agency that a previous disbursement of funds under this Agreement was improper. ARTICLE IX. Final Payment Grantee shall disburse the final payment to Subgrantee upon the performance of the following conditions: A. Subgrantee shall have completed the project; B. Subgrantee shall have submitted the documentation specified in Articles VI and VIII of this Agreement; C. In the case of Large Projects, the Grantee shall have performed the final inspection; D. In the case of Small Projects, the Project Listing and Certification shall have been reviewed by Grantee, or Grantee shall have performed a final inspection; and E. Subgrantee shall have requested final reimbursement. ARTICLE X. Records Maintenance. The funding of eligible costs under this Agreement and the performance of all other conditions shall be subject to the following requirements, in addition to such other and further requirements as may be imposed by operation of law: A. The "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments," as codified in 44 C.F.R. Part 13, as amended; Page 9 9 16C16 B. Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A -87, "Cost Principles for State and Local Governments," as amended; C. Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A -110, "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Other Agree- ments with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Non - Profit Organizations," as amended; and D. Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A -122, "Cost Principles for Non - Profit Organizations," as amended. E. Subgrantee will maintain all documentation concerning the projects funded under this Agreement until the occurrence of the following events, whichever is the later: 1. The completion of final inspection and final audit, and the final resolution of any issues identified in the same; or 2. The expiration of three (3) years from the date of final disbursement under this Agreement. F. Subgrantee shall make all documentation concerning the projects funded under this Agreement available and accessible to the Comptroller General of the United States, the Grantee, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 P.m. on weekdays other than official holidays. ARTICLE XI. Reimbursement of Funds. If upon final inspection, final audit, or other review by Grantee, the Federal Emergency Management Agency or other authority determines that the disbursements to Subgrantee under this Agreement exceed the eligible costs, Subgrantee shall reimburse to Grantee the sum by which the total disbursements exceed the eligible costs within Page 10 10 16C16 forty -five (45) days from the date Subgrantee is notified of such determination. ARTICLE XII. Audit. Subgrantee shall submit an Audit of Agreement Compliance to Grantee, and shall have an independent audit performed by a Certified Public Accountant if its total expenditures of federal financial assistance for the most recent fiscal year equal or exceed $300,000.00. A. Subgrantee will conduct the audit in accordance with the following requirements: 1. The standards established by the Comptroller General of the United States, as specified in the General Accounting Office Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities and Functions; 2. The standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants; 3. The requirements of H 11.45, 216.349, and 216.3491, Fla. Stat. (2001), and the Rules of the Auditor General; 4. The requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, Pub. L. 98 -502, as amended, 31 U.S.C. H 7501 -7507, to the extent here applicable; and 5. Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A -133, as amended, to the extent here applicable. w B. The audit shall be identified by the serial contract identification number for this Agreement. If the Subgrantee is a private nonprofit organization, it shall submit an organization - wide audit. Page I I 11 16C1-6 C. The audit shall be due not later than seven (7) months after the close of the fiscal year for Subgrantee except where Grantee and Subgrantee have mutually agreed upon another date. D. Subgrantee shall conduct such additional audits as Grantee or the Federal Emergency Management Agency may determine necessary to determine the adequacy, accuracy, and reliability fo the internal procedures Subgrantee has in place to protect its assets and to ensure compliance with this Agreement. E. If this Agreement is closed out without an audit, Grantee may recover from Subgrantee any disallowed costs identified in an audit after such closeout. ARTICLE XIII. Noncomnliance If the Subgrantee violates this Agreement or any legislation, regulation, statute, rule or other legal requirement applicable to the performance of this Agreement, the Grantee may withhold any disbursement otherwise due Subgrantee for the project with respect to which the violation has occurred until the violation is cured or has otherwise come to final resolution. If the violation is not cured, Grantee may terminate this Agreement and invoke its remedied under the Agreement in accordance with Articles XXI and XXV of this Agreement. ARTICLE XIV. Nondiscrimination by Contractors. Subgrantee shall undertake an active program of nondiscrimination in its administration of disaster assistance under this Agreement, in accordance with 44 C.F.R. Parts 7 and 16, and 44 C.F.R Part 206. In addition, Subgrantee shall be subject to the requirements in Page 12 12 16C16*1 the General Services Administrative Consolidated List of Debarred, Suspended and Ineligible Contractors, in accordance with 44 C.F.R Part 17. ARTICLE XV. Modification. The time for performance of this Agreement may be extended once unless the failure of Subgrantee to close out the project is caused by events beyond its control. A modification extending the time for completion of the project and any other modification shall be in writing, and shall take effect only upon execution by both parties. Modifications to any Project Worksheet to be funded under this Agreement may be requested by Subgrantee through Grantee, but the approval of any such modifications shall reside in the sole discretion of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Any approved modification to a project Worksheet shall be noted in a Supplemental Project Worksheet for the project. If otherwise allowed under this Agreement, any extension shall be in writing and shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as those set out in the initial Agreement. ARTICLE XVI. Time-for-Performance. Time shall be of the essence of this Agreement and of the performance of all conditions under it. Subject to any modification extending the time for the performance of this Agreement approved by Grarrtee or by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the time for the performance of emergency work shall be six (6) months from the date of the Presidential Declaration. The time fn" t-1,o permanent work shall be eighteen (18) months from the date of the Page 13 13 16C16 Presidential Declaration. For Large Projects the Summary of Documentation and the supporting documents identified in Article VI of this Agreement shall be submitted to the Grantee not later than sixty (60) days after the date of the last modification extending the Agreement. Subgrantee shall submit the completed Project Listing to Grantee not later than thirty (30) days from the completion of all work, or the approval of the Final Inspection by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, whichever is later. The time for the performance of this Agreement may be extended for cause by Grantee. If any extension request is denied, Subgrantee shall be reimbursed for eligible project costs incurred up to the latest approved date for completion. Failure to complete any project will be adequate cause for the termination of funding for that project. ARTICLE XVII. Contracts With Others If the Subgrantee contracts with any other contractor or vendor for performance of all or any portion of the work required under this Agreement, the Subgrantee shall incorporate into its contract with such contractor or vendor an indemnification clause holding Grantee and Subgrantee harmless from liability to third parties for claims asserted under such contract. ARTICLE XVIII. Termination. Either of the parties may terminate this Agreement by notice in writing delivered to the address specified in Article XXIII of this Agreement. Such termination shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of such notice. Such termination shall not affect the rights, Page 14 14 16C16 interests, duties or responsibilities of either of the parties or any allowable costs that have accrued as of the date of the notice of termination. ARTICLE XIX. Liability A. Grantee assumes no liability to third parties in connection with this Agreement. Unless the Subgrantee is a governmental entity covered by § 768.28(5), Fla. Stat. (2001), the Subgrantee shall be solely responsible to any and all contractors, vendors, and other parties with whom it contracts in performing this Agreement. Unless the Subgrantee is a governmental entity within the meaning of the preceding sentence, Subgrantee shall indemnify Grantee form claims asserted by to third parties in connection with the performance of this Agreement, holding Grantee and Subgrantee harmless from the same. B. For the purpose of this Agreement, the Grantee and Subgrantee agree that neither one is an employee or agent of the other, and that each one stands as an independent contractor in relation to the other. C. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver by Grantee or Subgrantee of any legal immunity, nor shall anvthincr in this Agreement be construed as a consent by either of the parties to be sued by third parties in connect-ion with any matter arising from the performance of this Agreement. D. Subgrantee represents that to the best of its knowledge any hazardous substances at its project site or sites are present in quantities within statutory and regulatory limitations, and do Page 15 15 16C16 not require remedial action under any federal, state or local legal requirements concerning such substances. Subgrantee further represents that the presence of any such substance or any condition at the site caused by the presence of any such substance shall be addressed in accordance with all applicable legal requirements. ARTICLE XX. Reports. Subgrantee shall provide Quarterly Reports to Grantee, on the Quarterly Report Form conforming to the sample attached as Attachment C. The first Quarterly Report shall be due at such time as Subgrantee is notified. All subsequent Quarterly Reports shall be due not later than thirty (30) days after each calendar quarter through final inspection. Quarterly Reports shall indicate the anticipated completion date for each project, together with any other circumstances that may affect the completion date, the scope of work, the project costs, or any other factors that may affect compliance with this Agreement. Interim inspections shall be scheduled by Subgrantee before the final inspection, and may be required by Grantee based on information supplied in the Quarterly Reports. Grantee may require additional reports as needed, and Subgrantee shall provide any additional reports requested by Grantee as soon as practicable. With respect to the Request for-Advance or Reimbursement, the Summary of Documentation, and the Quarterly Reports, the contact for Grantee will be the State Public Assistance Officer. ARTICLE XXI. Standard Conditions.. Subgrantee agrees to the Page 16 16 16C1(, ...4 following conditions: A. The performance and obligation of Grantee to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon an annual appropriation by the Legislature and the disbursement to Grantee of federal funding in accordance with § 252.37(4), Fla. Stat. (2001). S. Bills for fees or other compensation for services or expenses must be submitted in detail sufficient for a proper pre- audit and post - audit. C. Grantee may terminate this Agreement for refusal by the Subgrantee and it-s---contractors and subcontractors to allow public inspection of any records subject to the disclosure requirements in § 119.07(1), Fla. Stat. (2001), that are made or received by Subgrantee or its contractors and subcontractors in connection with this Agreement. Substantial evidence of noncompliance by Subgrantee or its contractors and subcontractors with these requirements shall constitute the nonperformance of a condi:�ion under this Agreement, and shall be adequate cause for termination. D. Subgrantee agrees that no funds disbursed to it under this Agreement will be used for the purpose of lobbying the Legislature or any of its members, any employee of the State of Florida, anv member of Congress, any officer or employee of Congress, or any employee of a Member of Congress, in connection with this Agreement or any modifications to this Agreement. E. Subgrantee certifies with respect to this Agreement that it possesses the legal authority to receive the funds. F. Subgrantee agrees that responsibility for compliance with Page 17 17 16C16 this Agreement rests with the Subgrantee, and further agrees that noncompliance with this Agreement shall be adequate cause for the recission, suspension or termination of funding under this Agreement, and may affect its eligibility for funding under future Subgrantee Agreements. ARTICLE XXII. Term. This Agreement small take effect upon its execution by both parties, and shall terminate upon the approval of closeout by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, unless terminated earlier as specified elsewhere in this Agreement. Subgrantee shall commence the projects) specified by this Agreement without delay. ARTICLE XXIII. Notice and Contact All notices under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered by InterNet, by telefacsimile, by hand, or by certified letter to the following respective addresses. FOR THE GRANTEE: W. Craig Fugate, Director Division of Emergency Management Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2100 FOR THE SUBGRANTEE: Thomas G. Wides Interim Director Public Utilities Division 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Bldg. H Naples, FL 34112 ARTICLE XXIV. Designation of Agent Subgrantee hereby designates Thomas G. Wides as its primary agent, and designates _Joseph Cheatham as its alternate agent, to execute any Request for Advance or Reimbursement, certification, or other necessary documentation. ARTICLE XXV. Events of Default Remedjes and Termination A. Upon the occurrence of any one or more of the following Page 18 18 16C1(, events, all obligations of Grantee to disburse further funds under this Agreement shall terminate at the option of Grantee. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, Grantee may at its option continue to make payments or portions of payments after the occurrence of any one or more such events without waiving the right to exercise such remedies and without incurring liability for further payment. Grantee may at its option terminate this Agreement and any and all funding under this Agreement upon the occurrence of any one or more of the following: 1. Any representation by Subgrantee in this Agreement is inaccurate or incomplete in any material respect, or Subgrantee has breached any condition of this Agreement or any previous agreement with Grantee and has not cured in timely fashion, or is unable or unwilling to meet its obligations under this Agreement. 2. Subgrantee suffers any material adverse change in its financial condition while this Agreement is in effect, as compared to its financial condition as represented in any reports or other documents submitted to Grantee, if Subgrantee has not cured the condition within thirty (30) days after notice in writing from Grantee; 3. Any reports required by this Agreement have not been submitted to Grantee or have been submitted with inaccurate, incomplete, or inadequate information; or 4. The monies necessary to fund this Agreement are unavailable due to any failure to appropriate or other action or inaction by Congress or the Legislature, or due to any action of Page 19 19 16C16 the Office of the Comptroller or the Office of Management and Budget. B. Upon the occurrence of any one or more of the following events, Grantee may at its option give notice in writing to Subgrantee to cure its failure of performance if such failure may be cured. Upon the failure of Subgrantee to cure, Grantee may exercise any one or more of the following remedies: 1. Terminate this Agreement upon not less than fifteen (15) days notice of such termination by certified letter to the Subgrantee at the address specified in Article XXIII of this Agreement, such notice to take effect when delivered to Subgrantee; 2. Commence a legal action for the judicial enforcement of this Agreement; 3. Withhold the disbursement of any payment or any portion of a payment otherwise due and payable under this Agreement or any other Agreement with Subgrantee; and 4. Take any other remedial actions which may otherwise be available under law. C. Grantee may terminate this Agreement for any misrepresentation of any material fact, for the failure or nonperformance of any condition or obligation under this Agreement, or for noncompliance with any applicable legal requirement. D. Rescission, suspension or termination of this Agreement shall constitute final action by the Grantee within the meaning of Page 20 ft 20 16C16 the Administrative Procedure Act, as amended. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, any deobligation of funds or other determination by the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall be addressed in accordance with the regulations of that Agency. E. Upon the rescission, suspension or termination of this Agreement, the Subgrantee shall refund to Grantee all funds disbursed to Subgrantee under this Agreement. ` F. The venue of any action or proceeding by either Grantee or Subgrantee for the enforcement of this Agreement or for an adjudication of the rights, interests, or duties of the parties to it shall lie in Leon County, State of Florida. G. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary elsewhere in this Agreement, the rescission, suspension or termination of this Agreement by Grantee shall not relieve Subgrantee of liability to Grantee for the restitution of funds advanced to Subgrantee under this Agreement, and Grantee may set off any such funds by withholding future disbursements otherwise due Subgrantee under this Agreement or any other Agreement until such time as the exact amount of restitution due Grantee from Subgrantee is determined. In the event the Federal Emergency Management Agency should deobligate funds formerly allowed under this Agreement or under any other Agreement funded by the Agency and administered by Grantee, then Subgrantee shall immediately repay such funds to Grantee. If the Subgrantee fails to repay any such funds, then Grantee may recover the same from funding otherwise due Subgrantee in accordance with this Article. Page 21 21 ARTICLE XXVI. Attachments. 16C16 A. All attachments to this Agreement are incorporated into this Agreement by reference as if set out fully in the text of the Agreement itself. B. In the event of any inconsistencies between the language of this Agreement and the Attachments to it, the language of the Attachments shall be controlling, but only to the extent of such inconsistencies. C. This Agreement has the following attachments: 1. Attachment A "Request for Advance or Reimbursement" 2. Attachment B "Summary of Documentation" 3. Attachment C "Quarterly Report Schedule and Instructions" Page 22 22 16C16 IN WITNESS HEREOF, the Grantee and Subgrantee have executed this agreement: FOR THE GRANTEE: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, State of Florida, By: W. Craig Fugate W. Craig Fugate, Director Division of Emergency Management DATE: 6 h,e��•zG,.zoo.�. ATTEST: ^ DWXGHT,E: B'kOCK,, CLERK By - VGD Ck irk ; Date: Public Assistance Program Program Description 02 -RM- * 2- 09 -21 -20 -017 Contract Number Approved as to form and Legal sufficiency: Ro ert N. Za ary Assistant County Attorney FOR THE SUBGRANTEE: COLLIER COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Public Utilities ( Subgrantee) Thomas G. Wides, Interim Public Utilities Director (Name) (Signature) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA B: Y Ja es N. Coletta, Chairman Date: Z4, 'zdo?.' Federal Employer ID No. Feb 28 02 05:10p Collier County Wastewater 941-591 -1611 ATTACHMENT A FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS DIVISION OF EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT Rcqucst fir Advance ur Reimbursement for Public Assistance Funds DISASTER # PROGRAM: Public Assistance SUBGRANTEE NAME: FiP$# AMRESS: PAYMENT NO(S): STATE: Florida. DC:A A(iREE'MENT # ZIP CODE: p.2 16C16 TOTAL CURRENT REQUEST S I certify that to the heal of my knowledge and belief the above accounts are correct. and that all dnbmsicmcats were made in a:"wdancx with 4 conditions of the DCA agreement and payment is due and has not been previously requested for these amounts. NAME: ______ TITLE: .._— - -- DATF: AUTIJ )RWING AGENT SIGNATURE: TO HE COMPLETED BY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (D(--A) APPROVED FOR PAYMChT $ E ADMINISTRATIVE COST $ t TOTAL PAYMENT GOVERNOR'S AUTHORIZED REPRF,SFNTATTVE DATE DC:A USE ONLY PW ELIGIBLE PREVIOUS CURRENT AMOUNT PAYMENTS REQUEST APPROVED FOR PAYMENT COMMENTS PW# CATF,CORY % COMPLETE PWY CATEGORY % COMPLETE PW# CATWORY ^/e COMPLETE PW# CATEGORY %COMPLETE PW# CATKAMY "k COMPLETE TOTAL CURRENT REQUEST S I certify that to the heal of my knowledge and belief the above accounts are correct. and that all dnbmsicmcats were made in a:"wdancx with 4 conditions of the DCA agreement and payment is due and has not been previously requested for these amounts. NAME: ______ TITLE: .._— - -- DATF: AUTIJ )RWING AGENT SIGNATURE: TO HE COMPLETED BY DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS (D(--A) APPROVED FOR PAYMChT $ E ADMINISTRATIVE COST $ t TOTAL PAYMENT GOVERNOR'S AUTHORIZED REPRF,SFNTATTVE DATE I it t7, -. 10 16C16 A I " VA i I H NAP ; - N ; `r> F 4i ;Y, li PAU'i", Fl ORIDA T)TVISION OF FINTEAMENCY M AN A (-4L,'fNJl PNI'T NUMMAKY t)t I-KJ(,UfVttf4lAllf,-fN I . N S . LirrORT OF AMOUNT CLAINTED FOR FUMBLE DfqASTFR WORK Appliewl't u1saster NO. M-A.-A,greelnent NO. HPS NO, r . v . v 1 P4 V, �i x tv 5� v CL eh eh t= 9 w 14 CD ro O cu ru I f 1 16C1(, u f a� rn �y C71 n tr'Cl r,,uno3 jaTTToo dQT :SO 20 B2 9aj I # I # # # I # # ! I 1 ISM I I I# I l I I i{ # I l l o l l i l l #al Iii I l l i l i l i l I I Icy{ I #! 1 1 1 1 # I I I!# I l i l i I I I I I I I I 1 I! 1 1 i 1 1 C C 1 C # l 1 l 1 l 1 i! 1 ICI IC1 !!! i i I i i I 1 I 1 I 1 I! 1 1 I 1 C l 1 1 I I! l I C l! I I!! I 9 w 14 CD ro O cu ru I f 1 16C1(, u f a� rn �y C71 n tr'Cl r,,uno3 jaTTToo dQT :SO 20 B2 9aj 16D 1 " TRANSPORTATION AGREEMENT FOR GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this ,522e day of , 2001 and between the DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (School Board), and the COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION, (Agency). WHEREAS, Chapter 234 of the Florida Statutes authorized local school districts to enter into agreements with organizations identified herein as Agency, for the use of school buses belonging to the school district, and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to utilize the school buses of the school district, and WHEREAS, Section 234.211(1)(a), Fla. Stat., provides that each school district may enter into agreements with the governing body of a county or municipality in the school district or any state agency for the use of school buses of the school district for transportation of the elderly, transportation disadvantaged or for any county, municipal or state purpose, and WHEREAS, this Agreement contemplates three (3) use options with concomitant reimbursement available to the Agency. IT IS THEREFORE AGREED that the school board shall provide buses, drivers or ESE attendants in accordance with the terms provided herein: 1. Option A — Bus and Driver a. Agency shall reimburse the School Board for each vehicle with driver at the rate of $17.78 per hour and $1.11 per operated mile for each bus and driver plus a fee (labor rate as needed) for cleaning and maintenance. b. Operated mile is defined as every mile driven for each bus operated in support of the Agency's Program, whether with passengers or not, and to include necessary trips to and from a School Board Transportation Department. Mileage will be recorded and billed by the School Board c. Agency will be billed a minimum of two hours plus mileage for each vehicle and driver. 16D i 2. Option B — Bus, Driver and ESE Attendant a. Agency shall reimburse the School Board at the rate of $29.97 per hour and $1.11 per operated mile for each vehicle with driver and ESE attendant plus a fee (labor rate as needed) for cleaning and maintenance b. Agency shall be billed a minimum of two hours plus mileage for each vehicle with driver and ESE attendant. 3. Option C -- Bus Only a. Agency shall reimburse the School Board at the rate of $1.11 per operated mile for each bus. b. Each bus will be returned to the Transportation Department of the School board at the end of each operating day. c. Agency will be assessed a cleaning fee (labor rate as needed) for each bus checked back if it is not clean. d. Buses will only be operated by employees of the Agency who are licensed and approved as school bus drivers by the Department of Transportation of the School Board. 4. The Agency agrees that all requests for use of buses, drivers and ESE attendants will be made at least two weeks prior to the date requested. All service is contingent upon bus and /or driver and /or ESE attendant availability. 5. The Agency agrees that in the event of a cancellation the School Board will be given at least 24 hours advance notice. In the event the notice of cancellation issued to the School Board is less than 24 hours, a 2 hour charge per vehicle will be due and payable to the School Board. 6. Payment for services rendered or due shall be assessed by the School Board by the 10th of each month and paid by the Agency by the 30th of each month. 7. Agency shall provide the School Board with evidence of liability insurance in connection with this agreement. 8. The Agency, pursuant of Section 234.211(2)(b), Fla. Stat., shall for purposes of liability for negligence be covered by Section 768.28, Fla. Stat. 9. The Agency agrees that there shall be no fee charged to passengers on the bus. 16D 1-4 10. Effective January 1, 1995, each Agency entering into a Transportation Agreement with Collier County Public Schools under Option C shall comply fully with the Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991. The Act requires persons who are operators of commercial motor vehicles, including school bus drivers, and who are subject to the requirement of a Commercial Driver License (CDL), be tested for drugs and alcohol in compliance with the Act. The Agency may utilize the school district's approved testing lab and the Agency shall pay the costs for each person tested by the laboratory. 11. The use of vehicles by the Agency shall at all times be subject to rules adopted by the School Board. 12. The Agreement shall commence on the date first above written and remain in effect through August 31, 2002. 13. This Agreement represents the entire Agreement between the parties and may not be amended except by written instrument signed by all parties hereto. 14. All the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by the parties and their legal representatives, successors and assigns. 16D 1 ' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement of the day and year first above written. Signed in the Presence of.- 2444e & ifi4ee Print Name: DISTRICT SCHOOL BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY L BY: dkc_ Dr. Dan W. White, Superintendent BY: Anne G fight, Chair COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECRI BY: Nan Title: Chairman 44%�02- ATTEST: r ~v DWIGHT E. BROCK, Cle't =kr BY: "<� ..... ,'Deputy Clerk It;3 Attest as 10 CMjr "* S 16D 3 MEMORANDUM Date: February 27, 2002 To: Debbie Roberts, Operations Coordinator Department of Parks and Recreation From: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Application from National Recreation and Parks Association for Accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies Enclosed please find the original application as referenced above, (Agenda Item #16D3), approved by the Board of County Commissioners on February 26, 2002. If you should have any questions, please contact me at extension 8406. Thank you. Enclosure 16.0 3 PRELIMINARY APPLICATION FOR PARK AND RECREATION AGENCY ACCREDITATION Please print or type date of application I. NAME OF PUBLIC ENTITY Collier County Parks & Recreation Name of Chief Executive James N. Coletta Title Chairman Name of City/County Manager, if one Tom 011 i f f H. NAME OF AGENCY ADMINISTERING PARK AND RECREATION SERVICES Collier Count Name of Agency Administrator Marla Ramsey. Parks & Recreation Director Title Director Address (office, street) 3300 Santa Barbara Blvd. City `Naples` State FL ZIP 34116 Phone (941) 353 -0404 FAX (941) 353 -1002 III. NAME OF DEPARTMENT OR DIVISION UNDER OR WITHIN WHICH THE AGENCY IS LOCATED, (IF APPLICABLE) Public Services Division Name of Chief Administrative Officer John Dunnuek Title Public Services Administrator Return form to: Allison R. Perso, Agency Accreditation Coordinator Commission for Accreditation of Park and Recreation Agencies National Recreation and Park Association 22377 Belmont Ridge Road Ashburn, VA 20148 We herewith submit our agency profile and preliminary application for participation in the agency accreditation program. Our $100 Preliminary Application Fee is enclosed. It is our understanding that 169 3 We will receive the SelfAssessment Manual and the Visitation Procedures plus a computer disk for developing the self assessment report; and that we are eligible to attend a visitor training workshop in order to familiarize ourselves with the standards and suggested evidences of compliance. t The self assessment report with the Formal Application and fee must be submitted within two years. The fee amount, based on our operating budget, is determined according to the scale below, established by the Commission. Z If circumstances warrant, we understand that a one -year extension may be requested and an additional $50 paid. Operating Budget Fee Operating Budget Fee under $500,000 $150 $5 million -- $9.9 million $1,500 $500,000 -- $ 1 million $250 $10 million -- $14.9 million $2,000 $1 million -- $2.5 million $500 $15 million -- $24.9 million $2,500 $2.5 million -- $5 million $1,000 over $25 million $3,000 In addition, we acknowledge our responsibility for covering the expenses of the visitation team and for the chair of the team to attend the Commission meeting at the time of our Agency's review. We will familiarize ourselves with the details regarding policies and procedures of the Accreditation process in the official publication, Visitation Procedures. We anticipate being able to submit the self assessment report on 3 ATTACHMENT: Our•Apj(i f .> fi� is attached. Signatures: i "' a"' James N- Coletta Park and Recreation Agency Administrator Marla Ramsey 2 -28 -04 date Nook Attest at so qN 1r • s date date A 77"wMA"Mm enGy yA l An agency is held accountable to the standards in effect at the time of this application. Agencies will be informed of upcoming training sessions and other pertinent information regarding the accreditation program. 2 Your formal application fee schedule is the one in effect at the time of the preliminary application. 3 Usually the visitation takes place within 60 days of submission of the report. �ApDD�� 160 3 1�1[ �Cl AGENCY PROFILE (Most current year) AGENCY NAME: Collier County Parks & Recreation Check each category once. Type of Entity (jurisdiction): borough town township X county Policy Structure: X regional /metro authority private district school other legal independent board under policy governing body (e.g. city council, school board, county commission) other (specify) Population in Area Served: (Gold Medal Award categories) % Class 1: over 250,000 population Class 2: 100,000 - 250,000 Class 3: 50,000 - 99,999 Class 4: 20,000 - 49,999 Class 5: under 20,000 Budget: (traditional park and recreation functions; does not include zoos, libraries, cemeteries, civic centers/arenas) Operating budget: $ 13,730,460 Capital budget: $ 15 , 019 ,100 Personnel: Number of full -time employees: 159 Scope of Function: % both parks and recreation parks only recreation only 160 � "ZA COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES 3301 E. TAMIAMI TR. SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT HEALTH AND COMMUNITY SERVICES BLDG. NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774 -8154 FAX: (941) 774 -3430 Ms. Leigh Smith, Acting Executive Director Senior Solutions of Southwest Florida 2285 First Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 Dear Leigh: Thank you so much for agreeing to strikethrough the language in the Master Agreement No. OAA 203.02 and Spending Authority Agreement No.OAA 203 -02. The language referenced in each Agreement is found within Sections III, A, 1 and reads: "...or on the date the contract has been signed by both parties, whichever is later." The purpose of this strikethrough, approved by both parties, is to reflect the intent of the parties to this agreement. Legal counsel (Chief Assistant County Attorney Ramiro Matialich) advises me that I can initial this change on behalf of the Board because the substance and the intent of the agreement previously approved by the Board is not changed by this strikethrough. Please find your agencies' copies of the agreements with my initials by the words that were eliminated. If you have further questions regarding this action, please do not hesitate to contact me at (941) 774 -8442. Sincerely, Barry Williams LCSW Director BAW Enclosures Cc: Ramiro Manalich, Chief Asst County Attorney, Office of the Collier County Attorney Jim Mitchell, Finance Director, Clerk of Circuit & County Courts of Collier County John Ferrell, Program Manager, Services for Seniors, Collier County Board of County Commissioners 01/01/02 Contract Number OAA 203.02 _ 4 STANDARD CONTRACT 16D AREA AGENCY ON AGI NG Collier County Board of County Commissioners THIS CONTRACT is entered into and between the Area Agency on Aging for Southwest Florida, Inc., DBA Senior Solutions of Southwest Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "agency", and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, hereinafter referred to as the "recipient." This contract is subject to all provisions contained in the MASTER AGREEMENT executed between the agency and the recipient, Agreement No. OAA 203.02, and its successor, incorporated herein by reference. The parties agree: I. Recipient Agrees: A. Services to be provided: To plan, develop, and accomplish the services delineated, or otherwise cause the planning, development, and accomplishment of such services and activities, under the conditions specified and in the manner prescribed in Attachment I of this agreement. B. Final Request for Payment: The recipient must submit the final request for payment to the agency no more than 45 days after the contract ends or is terminated; if the recipient fails to do so, all right to payment is forfeited, and the agency will not honor any requests submitted after the aforesaid time period. Any payment due under the terms of this contract may be withheld until all reports due from the recipient, and necessary adjustments thereto, have been approved by the agency. II. The Agency Agrees: Contract Amount: To pay for contracted services according to the conditions of Attachment I in an amount not to exceed $ 658,100.00, subject to the availability of funds. The State of Florida's performance and obligation to pay under this contract is contingent upon an annual appropriation by the Legislature. The costs of services paid under any other contract or from any other source are not eligible for reimbursement under this contract. The funds awarded to the recipient pursuant to this contract are in the state grants and aids appropriations and consist of the following: 1 01/01/02 1 Contract Number O 2 . Program Title Year Lead Agency Operations CFDA# Fund Amounts Title M Support Services 2002 Lead Agency Operations 93.044 $ 41,940.00 Title III C1 Congregate Meals 2002 Lead Agency Operations 93.045 $ 23,408.00 Title III C2 Home Delivered Meals 2002 Lead Agency Operations 93.045 $ 25,401.00 Title III E Services 2002 Lead Agency erations 93.052 $ 7,966.00 TOTAL LEAD AGENCY OPERATIONS rnNTAINVD IN THIS CONTRACT: $ 98,715.00 Program Title Year Spending Authority Allocation CFDA# Fund Amounts Title M Support Services 2002 Spending Authority 93.044 $ 237,663.00 Title III C1 Congregate Meals 2002 Spending Authority 93.045 $ 132,646.00 Title III C2 Home Delivered Meals 2002 Spending Authority 93.045 $ 143,936.00 Title III E Services 2002 Spending Authority 93.052 $ 45,140.00 TOTAL SPENDING AUTHORITY ALLOCATIONS CONTAINED IN THIS rnNTR ACT: $ 559,385.00 The legal services allocation for County is $ 10,724.00. This allocation is included in the Title III -B spending authority allocation shown above. III. Recipient and Agency Mutually Agree: A. Effective Date: 1. This contract shall begin on January 1, 2002 1� 2. This contract shall end on December 31, 2002. 2 01/01/02 16D Contract Number OAA 203.02 B. Termination, Suspension, and /or Enforcement: The causes and remedies for termination or suspension of this contract shall follow the same procedures as outlined in Section III. B. And Section III. C. of the Master Agreement. C. Recipient Responsibility: Notwithstanding the language contained in Section I.S.I of the Master Agreement, the recipient maintains responsibility for the performance of all sub - recipients and vendors in accordance with all applicable federal and state laws. D. Notice, Contact, and Payee Information: 1. The name, address, and telephone number of the contract manager for the agency for this contract is: Terry White, Executive Director Area Agency on Aging for Southwest Florida, Inc. DB /A Senior Solutions of Southwest Florida 2285 First Street Fort Myers, Florida 33901 941 - 332 -4233 / SC 748 -6947 2. The name, address, and telephone number of the representative of the recipient responsible for administration of the program under this contact is: Barry Williams Collier County Board of County Commissioners Collier County Services for Seniors Collier County Government Center, Bldg H 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 334112 (941) 774 -8443 Fax (941) 774 -3430 3. In the event different representatives are designated by either party, after execution of this contract, notice of the name and address of the new representative will be rendered in writing to the other party and said notification attached to originals of this contract. 4. The name (recipient name as shown on page 1 of this contract) and mailing address of the official payee to whom the payment shall be made: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Collier County Services for Seniors Collier County Government Center, Bldg H 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 334112 (941) 774 -8443 Fax (941) 774 -3430 01/01/02 Contract Number OAA 203.02 160 UNLESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this 14 page contract to be executed by their undersigned officials as duly authorized. RECIPIENT: Collier County Board of County Commissioners BOARD PRESIDENT OR AUTHORIZED DESIGNEE & A,/A NAME: James N. Coletta TITLE; Chairman AREA AGENCY ON AGING FOR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC. DBA SENIOR SOLUTIONS OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA SIGNEL BY: IN TITLE: BOARD PRESIDENT DATE: DATE: 4 FEDERAL ID NUMBER: 59-6000558 RECIPIENT FISCAL YEAR END DATE: September 30 Approved as to legal form and sufficiency: Ramiro Manalich Chief Assistant County Attorney 4 ATTEST: DWIGHT E. eAdkok CLEi�E ; Deputy Cterk t Attest as to Chainuo's sig"Um 01,10 01/01/02 I. STATEMENT OF PURPOSE Contract Number OAA 203.02 6 D 1r ATTACHMENT OLDER AMERICANS ACT PROGRAM The Older Americans Act (OAA) Program is a federal program, which provides assistance to older persons and caregivers. II. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED A. Services: The service recipient's application for the calendar year 2002, and any revisions thereto approved by the agency and located in the agency's file, are incorporated by reference in this contract between the agency and the recipient, and prescribe the services to be rendered by the recipient and prescribe the manner in which the recipient will meet the requirements of the Older Americans Act as amended in 2000. B. Manner of Service Provision: The services will be provided in a manner consistent with and described in the recipient's service recipient's application for calendar year 2002, the draft Department of Elder Affairs Client Services Manual dated 12/98, the Department of Elder Affairs National Family Caregiver Support Program Guidelines, and the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Assistant Secretary, Administration on Aging, Program Instruction, AoA- PI- 01 -02. In the event the manual or guidelines are revised, such revision will automatically be incorporated into the contract and the recipient will be given a copy of the revisions. The recipient agrees to perform the services of this contract in accordance with all federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations and policies that pertain to Older Americans Act funds. III. METHOD OF PAYMENT A. The method of payment in this contract includes advances, cost reimbursement for lead agency operations costs and Title III E services and fixed rate for other services. The recipient must ensure all costs and fixed rates include only those costs which are in accordance with all applicable state and federal statutes and regulations and are based on historical costs and audited historical costs when applicable. The recipient shall consolidate all requests for payment and all expenditure reports that support requests for payment from sub - recipients and vendors and shall submit to the department on forms 106A, 105A and 106E, and INVOICE FOR SERVICES AND CONTRIBUTION REPORT. B. The recipient shall maintain documentation to support payment requests, which shall be available to the Comptroller or the agency upon request. MAR 0 , M2 l 01/01/02 Contract Number OAA 203.02 C. The recipient if eligible may request a monthly advance for each of the first two months of the contract period, based on immediate anticipated cash needs. Detailed documentation justifying cash needs for advances must be submitted with the signed contract, approved by the agency, and maintained in the agency's file. For profit organizations cannot receive advance funds. All payment requests for the third through the twelfth months shall be based on the submission of monthly actual expenditure reports beginning with the first month of the contract. The schedule for submission of advance requests is ATTACHMENT II to this contract. Reconciliation and recouping of advances made under this contract are to be completed by the time the final payment is made. All advance payments are subject to the availability of funds. D. A final receipt and expenditure report (closeout report) will be forwarded to the agency within sixty (60) days after the contract ends or is terminated. All monies, which have been paid to the recipient and not used to retire outstanding obligations of the contract being closed out, must be refunded to the agency along with the final receipt and expenditure report. E. Any payment due by the agency under the terms of this contract may be withheld pending the receipt and approval by the agency of all financial and programmatic reports due from the recipient and any adjustments thereto, including any disallowance not resolved as outlined in Section I.T. of the Master Agreement. F. The recipient agrees to implement the distribution of funds as detailed in the service recipient's application and, ATTACHMENT III to this contract. Any changes in the amounts of federal or general revenue funds identified on ATTACHMENT III require a contract amendment. G. Financial Reports: The recipient agrees to provide an accurate, complete and current disclosure of the financial results of this contract as follows: 1. To submit all requests for payment and expenditure reports according to the format, schedule and requirements specified in ATTACHMENT I. 2. The completed manual units of service portions of the Older Americans Act Annual Report, if applicable, are due to the agency on or before October 5,2002. The agency will obtain the remaining Report sections from the Consumer Information, Registration and Tracking System (CIRTS). 01/01/02 Contract Number O Z'63.81 • IV. SPECIAL PROVISIONS A. Consumer Contributions and Co- payments for Services The recipient assures compliance with Section 315 of the Older Americans Act as amended in 2000, in regard to consumer contributions. For services not paid for with Older Americans Act funds, recipients may charge co- payments to those persons able to pay part or all of the cost of services. 2. Voluntary contributions are not to be used for cost sharing or matching. 3. Accumulated voluntary contributions are to be used prior to requesting Federal reimbursement. 4. Voluntary contributions and related interest earned are program income and must be used to expand services. B. Match The recipient will provide match of at least 10 percent of the cost for all services. The recipient's match will be made in the form of cash, and/or inkind resources. At the end of the contract period, all Older Americans Act funds must be properly matched. C. Title III Funds The recipient assures compliance with Section 306 of the Older Americans Act Amendments as amended in 2000, that funds received under Title III will not be used to pay any part of a cost (including an administrative cost) incurred by the recipient to carry out a contract or commercial relationship that is not carried out to implement Title 111. D. Carry Forward Funds Carry forward funds must be identified on the computation of carry forward report submitted with the closeout report and requests, for award of carry forward funds must be justified by the recipient and approved by the agency. All OAA carry forward funds must be budgeted in the same title as originally awarded. E. Prioritization for Service Delivery The recipient shall develop and implement policies and procedures consistent with Older Americans Act targeting criteria. F. Information and Referral 01/01/02 Contract Number OAA 203.02 16D The recipient shall ensure, through training and periodic monitoring, all Information and Referral /Assistance programs operating in their county adhere to the Standards for Professional Information & Referral, ATTACHMENT IV, to this contract. The basis of these agency standards are the standards published by the Alliance of Information & Referral Systems (ARES), copyright 2000, and amended by the agency and/or Department of Elder Affairs to meet the unique needs of the Elder Helpline system. G. Service Cost Reports: The recipient will submit semi - annual service cost reports, which reflect actual costs of providing each service by program. This report provides information for planning and negotiating unit rates. H. Caregiver Forums Recipients are encouraged to assist with local caregiver forums. Caregiver Forums are defined in the Department of Elder Affairs Title III -E National Family Caregiver Support Guidelines. 01/01/02 Contract Number OAA 160 . ATTACHMENT II OLDER AMERICANS ACT PROGRAM CONTRACT REPORT CALENDAR ADVANCE BASIS CONTRACT Submit to Agency Report On This Number Based On Date I January Advance* January 1 2 February Advance* January 1 3 January Expenditure Report February 10 4 February Expenditure Report March 10 5 March Expenditure Report April 10 6 April Expenditure Report May 10 7 May Expenditure Report June 10 g June Expenditure Report July 10 9 July Expenditure Report August 10 10 August Expenditure Report September 10 11 September Expenditure Report October 10 12 October Expenditure Report November 10 13 November Expenditure Report/Jan. Adv. Recon. ** December 10 14 December Expenditure Report/Feb. Adv. Recon. ** January 10 15 Final Expenditure and Request for Payment Report February 15 16 Closeout Report March 1 Legend: * Advance based on projected cash need. ** Submission of expenditure reports may or may not generate a payment request. If final expenditure report reflects funds due back to the agency, payment is to accompany the report. Note # 1: Report 41 for Advance Basis Contracts cannot be submitted to the State Comptroller prior to January 1 or until the contract with the agency has been executed and a copy sent to the Comptroller. Actual submission of the vouchers to the State Comptroller is dependent on the accuracy of the expenditure report. Note # 2: The last two months of the recipient's fiscal reports covering actual expenditures shall reflect an adjustment repaying advances for the first two months of the contract, if advances have not been recouped. 66 01/01/02 Contract Number OAA 203.02 16D� ATTACHMENT III OLDER AMERICANS ACT PROGRAM RECIPIENT: Collier County Board of County Commissioners Services Total Cost Reimbursement Rate Screening & Assessment $22.96 $20.67 Information $3.35 $3.01 Referral $3.55 $3.19 Transportation — Group $10.49 $9.44 10 01/01/02 1 Contract Number OAA 26D ATTACHMENT IV OLDER AMERICANS ACT PROGRAM SUMMARY OF STANDARDS FOR PROFESSIONAL INFORMATION & REFERRAL I. SERVICE DELIVERY Standard 1: Information Provision The Information and Referral (I & R) service shall provide information to the inquirer in response to a direct request for such information. Information can range from a limited response (such as organization's name, telephone number, and address) to detailed data about community service systems (such as explaining how a group intake system works for a particular agency), agency policies, and procedures for application. Every call, including information only calls, shall be documented. Documentation shall include the type of information requested and the action taken. Standard 2: Referral Provision The I & R service shall provide information and referral services in which the inquirer has one -to -one contact with an I & R specialist. The referral process consists of assessing the needs of the inquirer, identifying appropriate resources, assessing appropriate response modes, indicating organizations capable of meeting those needs, providing enough information about each organization to help inquirers make an informed choice, helping inquirers for whom services are unavailable by locating alternative resources, and, actively participating in linking the inquirer to needed services. Follow -up is required for each referral. The referral cannot be counted until follow -up is complete. Standard 3: Advocacy/Intervention The I & R service shall offer advocacy to ensure that people receive the benefits and services to which they are entitled and that organizations within the established service delivery system meet the collective needs of the community. For purposes of these standards, "advocacy" does not include legislative advocacy (lobbying). All advocacy efforts shall be consistent with policies established by the governing body of the I & R service and shall proceed only with the permission of the inquirer. Standard 4: Follow- Up Follow -up on referrals must be completed within 10 calendar days either by telephone or visit, to determine that services are being provided and that the person or caregiver is satisfied with the services as provided unless a crisis situation suggest more immediate follow -up. II 01/01/02 II. RESOURCE DATABASE Standard 5: Inclusion/ Exclusion Criteria Contract Number OAA 203.02 16D The I & R service shall develop criteria for the inclusion or exclusion of agencies and programs in the resource database. These criteria shall be uniformly applied and published so that staff and the public will be aware of the scope and limitations of the database. Standards 6: Data Elements A standardized profile shall be developed for each county's organization. The database shall include a recipient's legal name, common name and acronym, address (mailing and physical location) telephone number(s) and a description of services. Standard 7• Indexing the Resource Database/ Search Methods Information in the resource database shall be indexed and accessible in ways that support the I & R process. Standard 8: Database Maintenance The resource database shall be updated through continuous revision or at intervals sufficiently frequent to ensure accuracy of information and comprehensiveness of its contents. III. REPORTS AND MEASURE Standard 9: Inquirer Data Collection The I & R service shall establish and use a system for collecting and organizing inquirer data which facilitates appropriate referrals and provides a basis for describing requests for service, identifying service gaps and overlaps, assisting with needs assessments, supporting the development of products, identifying issues for staff training and facilitating the development of the resource information system. Inquirer data includes information gathered during follow -up as well as that acquired during the original contact. Standard 10• Data Analysis and Reporting The I & R service shall develop reports using inquirer data and/or data from the resource database to support community planning activities (or planning at other levels), internal analysis and advocacy. If requested, data will be provided to the Department of Elder Affairs. 12 O1 /01 /02 Contract Number OAA 203.02 IV. COOPERATIVE RELATIONSHIPS in the Local I& R S stem 160� Standard 11: Cooperative Relationships with Y__- In communities which have a multiplicity of comprehensive and specialized I & R recipients, the I & R service shall develop cooperative working relationships to build a coordinated I & R system which ensures broad access to information and referral services, maximizes the utilization of existing I & R resources, avoids duplication of effort and encourages seamless access to community resource information. I & R services within the system may choose to be "full service" programs performing all necessary I & R functions within their designated service area; or may prefer to partner with one or more I & R services to share those functions. (e.g., one I & R service might build and maintain the resource database and another might assume responsibility for service delivery.) Standard 12• Cooperative relationships within the Local Service Delivery System The I & R service shall strive to develop cooperative working relationships with local service recipients to build an integrated service delivery system which ensures broad access to community services, maximizes the utilization of existing resources, avoids duplication of effort and gaps in services, and facilitates the ability of people who need services to easily find the most appropriate recipient. Standard 13 Cooperative Relationships Among Local, State or Provincial, Regional, National, and International I & R Recipients Comprehensive and specialized I & R services at all geographic levels (local, state /provincial, regional, national and international) shall strive to develop formal and informal working relationships with the objective of broadening the availability of information and referral to all inquirers, facilitating access to appropriate resources regardless of their origin and/or location, avoiding duplication of effort and funding, expanding the effectiveness of social analysis with more global information about needs and services, and augmenting the impact of advocacy efforts through coordination, where possible. Standard 14• Participation in State or Provincial, Regional, National, and International I & R Associations The I & R service shall strive to strengthen state or provincial, regional, national, and international I & R networks by becoming active in planning, program development, advocacy, training, and other efforts at these levels. 13 01/01/02 Contract Number OAA 203.02 v. ORGANIZATIONAL REQUIREMENTS 1601 Standard 15: Governance The auspices under which the I & R service operates shall ensure the achievement of I & R goals and meet the standards set forth by the Department of Elder Affairs. Standard 16: Personnel Administration The I & R service shall provide a framework and mechanisms for program and personnel management and administration that guarantee the continuity and consistency required for effective service delivery. Standard 17: Staff Training The I & R service shall have a training policy and make training available to paid and volunteer staff. Standard 18: Promotion and Outreach The I & R service shall establish and maintain a program which increases public awareness of I & R services, their objectives, and their value to the community. At least two outreach projects targeting low- income minority and rural elders must be completed annually. 14 VkCOLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT DIVISION OF PUBLIC SERVICES SOCIAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT Ms. Leigh Smith, Acting Executive Director Senior Solutions of Southwest Florida 2285 First Street Fort Myers, FL 33901 Dear Leigh: 16D 5 3301 E. TAMIAMI TR. HEALTH AND COMMUNITY SERVICES BLDG. NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774 -8154 FAX: (941) 774 -3430 Thank you so much for agreeing to strikethrough the language in the Master Agreement No. OAA 203.02 and Spending Authority Agreement No.OAA 203 -02. The language referenced in each Agreement is found within Sections III, A, 1 and reads: "...or on the date the contract has been signed by both parties, whichever is later." The purpose of this strikethrough, approved by both parties, is to reflect the intent of the parties to this agreement. Legal counsel (Chief Assistant County Attorney Ramiro Maftalich) advises me that I can initial this change on behalf of the Board because the substance and the intent of the agreement previously approved by the Board is not changed by this strikethrough. Please find your agencies' copies of the agreements with my initials by the words that were eliminated. If you have further questions regarding this action, please do not hesitate to contact me at (941) 774 -8442. BAW Enclosures Cc: Ramiro Manalich, Chief Asst County Attorney, Office of the Collier County Attorney Jim Mitchell, Finance Director, Clerk of Circuit & County Courts of Collier County John Ferrell, Program Manager, Services for Seniors, Collier County Board of County Commissioners 01/01/2002 STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ELDER AFFAIRS MASTER AGREEMENT 16D 5 OAA 203.02 THIS MASTER AGREEMENT is entered into between the Area Agency on Aging for Southwest Florida, Inc. DBA Senior Solutions of Southwest Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "agency ", and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners , hereinafter referred to as the recipient. All contracts executed between the recipient and the agency shall be subject to the conditions set forth in this agreement for the duration of the contract period(s). Any and all contracts executed between the recipient and the agency during the effective period of this agreement will incorporate this agreement by reference and shall be governed in accordance with the laws, statutes, and other conditions set forth in this agreement. The parties agree: I. Recipient Agrees: A. To provide services according to the conditions specified in any contract(s) with the agency during the period this agreement is in effect. This agreement covers all services provided by the recipient under contract with the agency. B. Federal Laws and Regulations: 1. The recipient shall comply with the provisions of 45 CFR, Part 74, and /or 45 CFR, Part 92, and other applicable regulations. 2. The recipient shall comply with all applicable standards, orders, or regulations issued under Section 306 of the Clean Air Act, as amended (42 U.S.C. 1857(h) et seq.), Section 508 of the Clean Water Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1368 et seq.), Executive Order 11738, and Environmental Protection Agency regulation (40 CFR Part 15). The recipient shall report any violations of the above to the agency. 3. The recipient must, prior to execution of this agreement, complete the Certification Regarding Lobbying form, ATTACHMENT I. If a Disclosure of Lobbying Activities form, Standard Form LLL, is required, it may be obtained from the agency. All disclosure forms as required by the Certification Regarding Lobbying form must be completed and returned to the agency. 4. The recipient must, prior to execution of this agreement, complete the Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion Contracts /Subcontracts form, ATTACHMENT II. 5. The recipient shall comply with the provisions of the U.S. Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) code, 29 CFR, Part 1910.1030. C. Civil Rights Certification: The recipient gives this assurance in consideration of and for the purpose of obtaining federal 01/01/2002 16 D 5 ,' OAA 203.02 grants, loans, contracts (except contracts of insurance or guaranty), property, discounts, or other federal financial assistance to programs or activities receiving or benefitting from federal financial assistance. The recipient agrees to complete the Civil Rights Compliance Questionnaire,(DOEA forms 101 A and B), if services are provided to consumers and if fifteen (15) or more persons are employed. For recipients employing less than 15 persons, the agency requests completion of the Civil Rights Compliance Questionnaire. The recipient assures it will comply with: 1. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in programs and activities receiving or benefitting from federal financial assistance. 2. Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 794, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of handicap in programs and activities receiving or benefitting from federal financial assistance. 3. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, as amended, 20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq., which prohibits discrimination on the basis of sex in education programs and activities receiving or benefitting from federal financial assistance. 4. The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 6101 et seq., which prohibits discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving or benefitting from federal financial assistance. 5. Section 654 of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1981, as amended, 42 U.S.C. 9849, which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, handicap, political affiliation or beliefs in programs and activities receiving or benefitting from federal financial assistance. 6. The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, 42 USC 12101, et. seq., which prohibits discrimination against, and provides equal opportunities for individuals with disabilities, in employment, public services, and public accommodations. 7. All regulations, guidelines, and standards as are now or may be lawfully adopted pursuant to the above statutes. 8. The recipient shall establish procedures to handle complaints of discrimination involving services or benefits through this contract. The recipient shall advise clients, employees, and participants of the right to file a complaint, the right to appeal a denial or exclusion from the services or benefits from this contract, and their right to a fair hearing. Complaints of discrimination involving services or benefits through this contract may also be filed with the Secretary of the department or the appropriate federal or state agency. 9. The recipient agrees that compliance with these assurances is a condition of continued receipt of or benefit from federal financial assistance, and that it is binding upon the recipient, its successors, transferees, and assignees for the period during which such assistance is provided. The recipient further assures that all sub - recipients, vendors, or others with whom it arranges to provide services or benefits to participants or employees in connection with any of its programs and activities are not discriminating against those participants or employees in violation of the above statutes, regulations, guidelines, and 2 01/01/2002 16p 5 OAA 203.02 standards. In the event of failure to comply, the recipient understands that the agency may, at its discretion, seek a court order requiring compliance with the terms of this assurance or seek other appropriate judicial or administrative relief, including but not limited to, termination of and denial of further assistance. D. Requirements of Chapter 287, Florida Statutes: ' For all contracts covered by this agreement, the recipient agrees: 1. To submit bills for fees or other compensation for services or expenses in sufficient detail for a proper pre —audit and post —audit thereof. Expenditures prohibited from state or federal funds, as applicable, unless expressly provided by law include, but are not limited to: (a) Congratulatory telegrams; (b) Flowers and /or telephone condolences; (c) Presentation of plaques for outstanding service; (d) Entertainment for visiting dignitaries; (e) Refreshments such as coffee and doughnuts; (f) Decorative items (globe, statues, potted plants, picture frames, wall hangings, etc.); (g) Greeting Cards (section 286.27, F.S.); (h) Alcoholic beverages; (i) Portable heaters and fans, refrigerators, stoves, microwave ovens, coffee pots, coffee mugs, etc.; Q) Clocks for private offices; (k) Meals, except those served to inmates and clients of State Institutions; (1) Lobbying expenses (see Section I., paragraph L. of this agreement) 2. To follow the policies of the agency regarding any and all business travel pursuant to contracts covered by this agreement and to submit bills for any travel expenses in accordance with section 112.061, Florida Statutes. The State Comptroller approved Reimbursement of Travel Expenses form, or an equivalent form developed by the recipient, must be completed for all travel funded by contracts covered by this agreement. Receipts for car rental, air fare, lodging, and incidental expenses allowed by statute, are required documentation to be retained on file to support expenditures. Conference and convention travel require an agenda. Conference , convention, and out -of -state travel funded by contracts covered by this agreement require written authorization from the appropriate authority at the agency. Per diem and meal reimbursement will be paid in accordance with the time periods and rates specified in statute. 3. To provide units of deliverables, including reports, findings, and drafts as specified in the contracts and contract attachments covered by this agreement, and the service provider application developed by the recipient (pursuant to Section 306(a) of the Older Americans Act), to be received and accepted by the agency prior to payment. 4. To allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other materials subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by the recipient in conjunction with this agreement and any contracts incorporating this agreement by reference. It is expressly understood that substantial evidence of the recipient's refusal to comply with this provision shall constitute a breach of contract. 5. To develop procurement procedures for all services purchased pursuant to this agreement, and all contracts and subcontracts subject to this agreement, in accordance with state and federal regulations to encourage competition and promote a diversity of contractors for services for the elder consumers. 3 01/01/2002 OAA 203.02 E. Withholdings and Other Benefits: 16D The recipient is responsible for Social Security and Income Tax withholdings. F. Indemnification: If the recipient is a state or local governmental entity, pursuant to subsection 768.28(18) Florida Statutes, the provisions of this section do not apply. Recipient and all sub - recipients agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the agency and /or state and all of the agency and/or state officers, agents, and employees from any claim, loss, damage, cost, charge, or expense arising out of any acts, actions, neglect or omission, action in bad faith, or violation of federal or state law by the recipient, its agents, employees, or sub - recipients during the performance of all contracts incorporating this agreement by reference, whether direct or indirect, and whether to any person or property to which the agency or said parties may be subject, except neither recipient nor any of its sub - recipients will be liable under this section for damages arising out of injury or damage to persons or property directly caused or resulting from the sole negligence of the agency and/or state or any of its officers, agents, or employees. 2. Recipient's and sub - recipient's obligation to indemnify, defend, and pay for the defense or, at the agency's and/or state option, to participate and associate with the agency and /or state in the defense and trial of any claim and any related settlement negotiations, shall be triggered by the agency and/or state notice of claim for indemnification to recipient. Recipient's and sub - recipient's inability to evaluate liability or its evaluation of liability shall not excuse recipient's or sub - recipient's duty to defend and indemnify the agency and /or state, upon notice by the agency and/or state. Notice shall be given by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested. Only an adjudication or judgment after the highest appeal is exhausted specifically finding the agency and /or state solely negligent shall excuse performance of this provision by recipients and sub - recipients. Recipients shall pay all costs and fees related to this obligation and its enforcement by the agency and /or state.. The agency and /or state failure to notify the recipient or sub - ecipient of a claim shall not release recipient or sub - ecipient of the above duty to defend. 3. It is the intent and understanding of the parties that the recipient nor any of its sub - recipients are employees of the agency and/or state and shall not hold themselves out as employees or agents of the agency and /or state without specific authorization from the agency and /or state. It is the further intent and understanding of the parties that the agency and /or state does not control the employment practices of the recipient and shall not be liable for any wage and hour, employment discrimination, or other labor and employment claims against the recipient. G. Insurance and Bonding: 51 To provide adequate liability insurance coverage on a comprehensive basis and to hold such liability insurance at all times during the effective period of any and all contracts incorporating this agreement by reference. The recipient accepts full responsibility for identifying and determining the type(s) and extent of liability insurance necessary to provide reasonable financial protections for the recipient and the clients to be served under contracts incorporating this agreement by reference. Upon execution of each contract covered under this agreement, the recipient shall furnish the agency written verification supporting both the determination and existence of such insurance coverage. Such coverage may be provided by a self- insurance program established and operating under the laws of the State of Florida. The agency reserves the right to require additional W. 01/01/2002 insurance where appropriate. OAA 203.02 16D 5 2. To furnish an insurance bond from a responsible commercial insurance company covering all officers, directors, employees and agents of the recipient authorized to handle funds received or disbursed under all contracts incorporating this agreement by reference in an amount commensurate with the funds handled, the degree of risk as determined by the insurance company and consistent with good business practices. 3. If the recipient is a state agency or subdivision as defined by section 768.28, Florida Statutes, the recipient shall furnish the agency, upon request, written verification of liability protection in accordance with section 768.28, Florida Statutes. Nothing herein shall be construed to extend any party's liability beyond that provided in section 768.28, Florida Statutes. (See also Indemnification clause.) H. Abuse Neglect and Exploitation Reporting: In compliance with Chapter 415, F.S., an employee of the recipient who knows, or has reasonable cause to suspect, that a child, aged person or disabled adult is or has been abused, neglected, or exploited, shall immediately report such knowledge or suspicion to the State of Florida's central abuse registry and tracking system on the statewide toll -free telephone number (1- 800- 96ABUSE). I. Transportation Disadvantaged: If clients are to be transported under any contracts incorporating this agreement, the recipient will comply with the provisions of Chapter 427, Florida Statutes, and Rule Chapter 41 -2, Florida Administrative Code. J. Purchasing: Procurement of Products or Materials with Recycled Content Any products or materials which are the subject of, or are required to carry out any contracts under this agreement shall be procured in accordance with the provisions of Section 403.7065 and 287.045, Florida Statutes. K. Sponsorship: As required by Section 286.25, Florida Statutes, if the recipient or sub - ecipient is a non- governmental organization which sponsors a program financed wholly or in part by state funds, including any funds obtained through contracts executed in accordance with this agreement, it shall in publicizing, advertising or describing the sponsorship of the program, state: "Sponsored by Collier County Board of County Commissioners Recipient the State of Florida, Department of Elder Affairs, and Area Agency on Aging for Southwest Florida, Inc. DBA Senior Solutions of Southwest Florida. If the sponsorship reference is in written material the words "State of Florida, Department of Elder Affairs "and "Area Agency on Aging for Southwest Florida, Inc. DBA Senior Solutions of Southwest Florida shall appear in the same size letters and type as the name of the organization. 5 01/01/2002 OAA 203.02 1 5 The recipient shall also display a graphic of the department's Pillars logo on all printed material, ATTACHMENT VI and a araphic of the agency's loans.. This shall include, but is not limited to, any correspondence or other writing, publication or broadcast that refers to such program. 2. If the recipient is a governmental entity or political subdivision of the state, the agency requests compliance with the conditions specified above. 3. The recipient shall not use the words "The State of Florida, Department of Elder Affairs "or Area Agency on Aging for Southwest Florida, Inc. DBA Senior Solutions of Southwest Florida, to indicate sponsorship of a program otherwise financed unless specific authorization has been obtained by the agency prior to use. L. Use of Funds For Lobbying Prohibited: To comply with the provisions of Section 216.347, Florida Statutes, which prohibit the expenditures of contract funds for the purpose of lobbying the Legislature, a judicial branch or a state agency. M. Employment If the recipient is a non - governmental organization, it is expressly understood and agreed the recipient will not knowingly employ unauthorized alien workers. Such employment constitutes a violation of the employment provisions as determined pursuant to section 274A(e) of the Immigration Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. s.1324 a (e)( "section 274A(e) "). Violation of the employment provisions as determined pursuant to section 274A(e) shall be grounds for unilateral cancellation of any and all contracts incorporating this agreement by reference. N. Audits and Records: 1. To maintain books, records, and documents (including electronic storage media) in accordance with generally accepted accounting procedures and practices which sufficiently and properly reflect all revenues and expenditures of funds provided by the agency under all contracts covered by this agreement. Recipients and sub - recipients agree to maintain records including paid invoices, payroll registers, travel vouchers, copy logs, postage logs, time sheets, etc., as supporting documentation for service cost reports and for administrative expenses itemized for reimbursement. This documentation will be made available upon request for monitoring and auditing purposes. 2. To assure these records shall be subject at all reasonable times to inspection, review, audit, copy, or removal from premises by state personnel and other personnel duly authorized by the agency, as well as by federal personnel, if applicable. 3. To maintain and file with the agency such progress, fiscal and inventory and other reports as the agency may require within the period of this agreement. Such reporting requirements must be reasonable given the scope and purpose of the contracts incorporating this agreement by reference. 4. To submit management, program, and client identifiable data, as specified in the Department of Elder Affairs Client Services Manual. To assure, program specific data is recorded and submitted in accordance with Department of Elder Affairs Client Information Registration and Tracking System (CIRTS) Policy Guidelines. C. 01/01/2002 OAA 203.12` 0 5 5. To provide a financial and compliance audit to the agency as specified in ATTACHMENT III and to ensure all related party transactions are disclosed to the auditor. 6. To include these aforementioned audit and record keeping requirements, including Attachment III, in all subcontracts and assignments. 7. The recipient agrees to provide client information and statistical data for research and evaluative purposes when requested by the agency. 8. To provide to the agency all fiscal information regarding services contracted to recipients pursuant to this agreement using an application provided by the agency. O. Retention of Records: 1. To retain all client records, financial records, supporting documents, statistical records, and any other documents (including electronic storage media) pertinent to each contract covered under this agreement for a period of five (5) years after termination of the contract(s), or if an audit has been initiated and audit findings have not been resolved at the end of five (5) years, the records shall be retained until resolution of the audit findings. 2. Persons duly authorized by the agency and federal auditors, pursuant to 45 CFR, Part 92.42(e), (1), and (2), shall have full access to and the right to examine or duplicate any of said records and documents during said retention period or as long as records are retained, whichever is later. P. Monitoring and Incident Reporting: The recipient will provide progress reports, including data reporting requirements as specified by the agency to be used for monitoring progress or performance of the contractual services as specified in the service provider application. The agency will establish performance standards for recipients with weights assigned to each standard. Standards will be tracked monthly by agency staff through desk reviews of available fiscal, CIRTS, and research production reports and any other system or process designated by the agency. This information will allow staff to determine if on -site monitoring of the recipient is necessary. Examples of review criteria are surplus /deficit, independent audits, internal controls, reimbursement requests, sub- ecipient monitoring, targeting, program eligibility, outcome measures, service provision to clients designated as "high risk" by the Department of Children & Families, Adult Protective Services program, data integrity, co- payments, client satisfaction, correspondence, and client file reviews. 2. Recipients will perform administrative and programmatic monitoring of sub - recipients to ensure contractual compliance, fiscal accountability, programmatic performance, and compliance with applicable state and federal laws and regulations. 3. To permit persons duly authorized by the agency and /or state to inspect any records, papers, documents, facilities, goods and services of the recipient and sub - recipients which are relevant to contracts incorporating this agreement by reference, or to the mission and statutory authority of the agency and /or state, and to interview any clients and employees of the recipient and sub - recipients to be assured of satisfactory performance of the terms and conditions of these contract(s). Following such inspection the agency and/or state will deliver to the recipient a list of its concerns with regard to the manner in which said goods or services are being provided. The recipient will rectify all noted deficiencies provided by the agency and/or state within the time set forth by the agency and/or state, or provide the 7 01/01/2002 OAA 203. 2 d acce table justification for the reci nre agency and/or state with a reasonable an p 1 to correct the noted shortcomings. The agency and/or state shall determine whether such failure is reasonable and acceptable. The recipient's failure to correct or justify deficiencies within a reasonable time as specified by the agency and/or state may result in the agency and /or state taking any of the actions identified in section III., C., Enforcement or the agency and/or state deeming the recipient's failure to be a breach of contract. 4. The recipient will notify the agency within 48 hours of conditions related to performance that could impair continued service delivery. Reportable conditions may include: • proposed consumer terminations • recipient or sub - ecipient financial concerns /difficulties • service documentation problems • contract non - compliance • service quality and consumer complaint trends. Recipients will provide the agency with a brief summary of the problem(s) and proposed corrective action plans and time frames for implementation. Q. Safeguarding Information: Except as provided for agency and /or state auditing and monitoring purposes, not to use or disclose any information concerning a consumer who receives services under contracts incorporating this agreement by reference or subsequent contracts for any purpose not in conformity with state and federal regulations (45 CFR, Part 205.50), except upon written consent of the consumer, or the consumer's authorized representative. R. Assignments and Subcontracts: Agency approval of the service provider application from the recipient shall constitute agency approval of the recipient subcontracts if the subcontracts follow the service and funding information identified in the service provider application. The recipient must submit all contracts for services under the service provider application to the agency for prior approval when the proposed sub - ecipient is a profit making organization. No such approval by the agency of any assignment or subcontract shall be deemed in any event or in any manner to provide for the incurrence of any obligation of the agency in addition to the total dollar amount agreed upon in contracts covered by this agreement. All assignments or subcontracts shall be subject to the conditions of this agreement and the contracts incorporating it by reference and to any conditions of approval the agency shall deem necessary. Section I, paragraph M. is only applicable to state agencies or political subdivisions of the state. 2. If the recipient deems a service provider to be a vendor rather than a sub - ecipient, as defined in OMB Circular A -133, subpart B, section .210, this determination must be documented in writing. When a vendor relationship is identified, a contract with all of the terms and conditions set forth in this agreement is not required. However, a written agreement outlining services to be performed and conditions for procurement, receipt and payment for services, in compliance with the contracts covered by this agreement, is required. The recipient is responsible for assuring program compliance and performance, and any applicable conditions of this agreement and the contracts covered by it, that were not passed down to sub - recipients. 3. Unless otherwise stated in the contract(s) covered by this agreement between the recipient 0 01/01/2002 OAA 203.02 160 5 and sub - ecipient, payments made by the recipient to the sub - ecipient must be within seven (7) working days after receipt by the recipient of full or partial payments from the agency in accordance with section 287.0585, Florida Statutes. Failure to pay within seven (7) working days will result in a penalty charged against the recipient and paid to the sub - ecipient in the amount of one -half of one (1) percent of the amount due, per day from the expiration of the period allowed herein for payment. Such penalty shall be in addition to actual payments owed and shall not exceed fifteen (15) percent of the outstanding balance due. S. Return of Funds: 1. To return to the agency any overpayments due to unearned funds or funds disallowed pursuant to the terms of all contracts for which funds were disbursed to the recipient by the agency. a. The recipient shall return any overpayment to the agency within forty (40) calendar days after either discovery by the recipient, or notification by the agency, of the overpayment. b. In the event the recipient or its independent auditor discovers an overpayment has been made, the recipient shall repay said overpayment within forty (40) calendar days without prior notification from the agency. In the event the agency first discovers an overpayment has been made, the agency will notify the recipient by letter of such a finding. c. Overpayments to recipients due to unallowable or un- allocable expenses or to vendors or sub - recipients due to billing discrepancies must be returned to the recipient under the same terms and conditions as this section. Information indicating recipients have been overpaid as a result of over - budgeting on the unit cost methodology can be used by the recipient to negotiate lower rates in subsequent years. Continuous overpayment to recipients due to over budgeting may result in a demand for repayment to the recipient or the agency under the same terms and conditions of this section. Repayment received by the recipient must be reported to the agency and may be either re- allocated to other sub - ecipient(s) or returned to the agency, at the agency's discretion. 2. Should repayment not be made in a timely manner, the agency will charge interest of one (1) percent per month compounded on the outstanding balance forty (40) calendar days after the date of notification or discovery. T. Data Integrity Pursuant to the accounting and reporting requirements for federal grants management in OMB Circulars A -102 and A -110, and the Department of Management Services (DMS) Memorandum No. 6 (98 -99) which requires certification of Data Integrity for any procurement document, the recipient must, prior to execution of this agreement, complete the Data Integrity Certification form, ATTACHMENT IV In the event a data integrity issue results in a delay of service, the recipient agrees to execute their agency disaster plan to ensure the delivery of service(s) continues. U. Conflict of Interest: The recipient hereby agrees to develop and implement a policy to ensure that its 9 01/01/2002 OAA 203.02 160 s employees, board members, management and sub - recipients, will avoid any conflict of interest or the appearance of a conflict of interest when disbursing or using the funds described in this agreement or when contracting with another entity which will be paid by the funds described in this agreement. The recipient's board members and management must disclose to the agency any relationship which may be, or may be perceived to be, a conflict of interest within thirty (30) days of an individual's original appointment or placement in that position, or if the individual is serving as an incumbent, within thirty (30) days of the commencement of this agreement. The recipient's employees and sub - recipients must make the same disclosures described above to the recipient's board of directors. V. Successors and Transferees: This agreement and its attachments are binding on the recipient and its successors and transferees. 11. The Agency Agrees: A. Contract Payment: The provider's invoice will be sent to the Department of Elder Affair in conjunction with other invoices received by the agency from other agreements subject to review and approval by the agency. Such approval is for the purpose of authorizing payments and does not constitute final approval of services purchased. Pursuant to Section 215.422, Florida Statutes, the agency shall take no longer than five working days to inspect and approve goods and services, unless bid specifications or the contract for which payment is requested specifies otherwise. The agency will submit the request for payment to the Department of Elder Affairs after inspection and approval of goods and services. Once the Department of Elder affairs had made payment to the agency, the agency will reimburse the provider within seven working days after receipt by the agency of full or partial payments from the Department of Elder Affairs in accordance with section 287.0585, Florida Statutes. Failure to pay within seven (7) working days will result in a penalty charged against the agency and paid to the provider in the amount of one -half of one percent of the amount due, per day from the expiration of the period allowed herein for payment. Such penalty shall be in addition to actual payments owed and shall not exceed fifteen(15) percent of the outstanding balance due. B. Vendor Ombudsman: A Vendor Ombudsman has been established within the Department of Banking and Finance. The duties of this individual include acting as an advocate for recipients and vendors who may be experiencing problems in obtaining timely payment(s) from a state agency. The Vendor Ombudsman may be contacted at (850) 410 -9354 or by calling the State Comptroller's Hotline, 1- 800 - 848 -3792. Recipients experiencing problems obtaining timely payment(s) from recipients may contact the agency's contract manager at (850) 414 -2000. III. Recipient and Agency Mutually A ^r° A. Effective Date This agreement shall begin and shall end on December 31, 2002. 2. All contracts executed between the agency and the recipient during the effective period of this agreement shall reference this agreement by number, incorporating it therein, and 10 01/01/2002 OAA 203.021 60 5 shall be governed by the conditions of this agreement for the duration of the contract period(s). B. Termination: 1. Termination at Will Any contract(s) covered by this agreement and incorporating it by reference may be terminated by either party upon no less than thirty (30) calendar days notice, without cause, unless a lesser time is mutually agreed upon by both parties, in writing. Said notice shall be delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested, or in person with proof of delivery. In the event the recipient terminates a contract at will, the recipient agrees to submit, at the time it serves notice of the intent to terminate, a plan which identifies procedures to ensure services for consumers pursuant to this agreement or any subcontract will not be interrupted or suspended by the termination. In the event that an agreement between a recipient and a sub - ecipient is terminated, the recipient shall require the sub - ecipient to submit to the recipient and the agency, a similar plan ensuring services to consumers will not be interrupted or suspended by the termination. 2. Termination Because of Lack of Funds In the event funds to finance any contract(s) under this agreement become unavailable, the agency may terminate the affected contract or contracts upon no less than twenty -four (24) hours notice in writing to the recipient. Said notice shall be delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested, or in person with proof of delivery. The agency shall be the final authority as to the availability of funds. 3. Termination for Breach Unless the breach is waived by the agency in writing, or the recipient fails to cure the breach within the time specified by the agency, the agency may, by written notice to the recipient, terminate the contract(s) incorporating this agreement by reference upon no less than twenty -four (24) hours notice. Said notice shall be delivered by certified mail, return receipt requested, or in person with proof of delivery. If applicable, the agency may employ the default provisions in Chapter 60A- 1.006(3), Florida Administrative Code. Waiver of breach of any provisions of any one contract covered by this agreement shall not be deemed to be a waiver of any other breach and shall not be construed to be a modification of the terms of other contracts covered under this agreement. The provisions herein do not limit the agency's right to remedies at law or to damages of a legal or equitable nature. C. Enforcement: The agency may, in accordance with section 430.04, Florida Statutes, take intermediate measures against the recipient, including: corrective action, unannounced special monitoring, temporary assumption of the operation of one or more contractual services, placement of the recipient on probationary status, imposing a moratorium on recipient action, imposing financial penalties for nonperformance, or other administrative action pursuant to Chapter 120 Florida Statutes, if the agency finds that: • an intentional or negligent act of the recipient has materially affected the health, welfare, or safety of consumers served pursuant to this agreement, or substantially and negatively affected the operation of services covered under this agreement 11 01/01/ 2002 OA-4 203.021 5 • the recipient lacks financial stability sufficient to meet contractual obligations or that contractual funds have been misappropriated. • the recipient has committed multiple or repeated violations of legal and regulatory standards, regardless of whether such laws or regulations are enforced by the agency, or the recipient has committed or repeated violations of agency standards. • the recipient has failed to continue the provision or expansion of services after the declaration of a state of emergency. • the recipient has failed to adhere to the terms of this agreement or the terms of any contract(s) covered by this agreement and incorporating it by reference. 2. In making any determination under this provision the agency may rely upon the findings of another state or federal agency, or other regulatory body. Any claim for breach of contract is exempt from administrative proceedings and shall be brought before the appropriate entity in the venue of Lee County. Before the agency formally initiates any intermediate measure, or either party commences equitable or legal action of any sort, both parties agree to engage in informal mediation through a meeting of each party's representative at a place and location designated by the agency. D. Notice and Contact: 1. The name, address and telephone number of the agency for this agreement is: Terry White, Executive Director Area Agency on Aging for Southwest Florida DBA Senior Solutions of Southwest Florida 2285 First Street Fort Myers, Florida 33901 941 - 332 -4233 / SC 748 -6947 2. The name, address and telephone number of the recipient for this agreement is: Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774 -8443 Fax(941) 774 -3430 3. The name of the contact person, street address and telephone number where financial and administrative records are maintained: Barry Williams Collier Countv Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941)774 -8443 Fax(941) 774 -3430 12 01/01/2002 E.Renegotiation or Modification: OAA 203. 60 5 1.Modifications of provisions of this agreement and of any and all contract(s) incorporating this agreement by reference shall only be valid when they have been reduced to writing and duly signed by both parties. The parties agree to renegotiate this agreement and any affected contracts if revisions of any applicable laws or regulations make changes in this agreement necessary. 2.The rate of payment and the total dollar amount may be adjusted retroactively for any contract(s) incorporating this Master Agreement by reference to reflect price level increases and changes in the rate of payment only when these have been established through the appropriations process and subsequently identified in the agency's operating budget. IV. The Recipient Agrees to the following special provisions: A.Property 1.Non- expendable property is defined as tangible property of a non - consumable nature with an acquisition cost of $1000 or more per unit, and expected useful life of at least one year; and hardback bound books not circulated to students or the general public, with a value or cost of $250 or more. Hardback books with a value or cost of $25 or more should be classified as an OCO expenditure only if they are circulated to students or the general public. 2 All property purchased under contracts covered by this agreement or purchased by the agency and received by the recipient shall be listed on the property records of the recipient. Said listing shall include a description of the property, model number, manufacturer's serial number, funding source, information needed to calculate the federal and /state share, date of acquisition, unit acquisition cost, property inventory number and information on the location, use and condition, transfer, replacement or disposition of the property(including fair market value and sales price at disposition). 3.A physical inventory of equipment shall be taken and the results reconciled with the equipment records at least once every two years. Discrepancies shall be investigated to determine the difference. Any loss, damage or theft of equipment shall be fully investigated and fully documented and if the equipment is purchased with state or federal funds, shall be reported to the agency. The property records must be maintained on file and shall be provided to the agency upon request. 43itle (ownership) to all property acquired with funds from any contracts covered by this agreement or otherwise purchased by the agency shall be vested in the agency upon completion or termination of the contract(s). 5.At no time shall the recipient dispose of non - expendable property except with the permission of, and in accordance with instructions from the agency. Any permanent storage devices (e.g.: hard drives, removable storage media) must be reformatted and tested prior to disposal to ensure no confidential information remains. 6.An area plan amendment is required to be submitted by the recipient and approved by the agency's contract manager prior to the purchase of any item of non - expendable property not specifically listed in the approved budget. 7. Information Technology Resources The recipient must adhere to the agency's procedures and standards when purchasing Information 13 01/01/2002 OAA 203.021 60 5 Technology Resources (ITR) as part of any contract(s) incorporating this agreement by reference. An ITR worksheet is required for any computer related item costing $1,000.00 or more, including data processing hardware, software, services, supplies, maintenance, training, personnel and facilities. The completed ITR worksheet shall be maintained in the LAN administrator's file and must be provided to the agency upon request. The recipient has the responsibility to require any sub - recipients to comply with the agency's ITR procedures. B.Copyright Clause Where activities supported by any contract(s) incorporating this agreement by reference produce original writing, sound recordings, pictorial reproductions, drawings or other graphic representation and works of any similar nature, the agency has the right to use, duplicate and disclose such materials in whole or part, in any manner, for any purpose whatsoever and to have others acting on behalf of the agency do so. If the materials so developed are subject to copyright, trademark or patent, then legal title and every right, interest, claim or demand of any kind in and to any patent, trademark, copyright, or application for the same, will vest in the State of Florida, Department of State, for the exclusive use and benefit of the state. Pursuant to Section 286.021, Florida Statutes, no person, firm or corporation, including parties to this contract, shall be entitled to use the copyright, patent or trademark without the prior written consent of the Department of State. C.Grievance and Appeal Procedures 1. In accordance with ATTACHMENT V , Minimum Guidelines for Recipient Grievance Procedures, the recipient will assure development of procedures for handling complaints from persons who complain service has been denied, terminated or reduced. 2.Recipients and sub - recipients will establish complaint procedures for older consumers who are dissatisfied with or denied services. These procedures must include notice of the right to complain and to have their complaint reviewed. D.Investigation of Allegations Any report that implies criminal intent on the part of this recipient or any sub - ecipient and referred to a governmental or investigatory agency must be sent to the agency. The recipient must investigate allegations regarding falsification of client information, service records, payment requests, and other related information. If the recipient has reason to believe that the allegations will be referred to the State Attorney, a law enforcement agency, the United States Attorney's Office, or other governmental agency, the recipient shall notify the Inspector General at the agency immediately. A copy of all documents, reports, notes or other written material concerning the investigation, whether in the possession of the recipient or sub - ecipient, must be sent to the agent department Inspector General with a summary of the investigation and allegations. E.Disaster In preparation for the threat of an emergency event as defined in the State of Florida Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan, the Department of Elder Affairs may exercise authority over an area agency or service provider to implement preparedness activities to improve the safety of the elderly in the threatened area and to secure area agency and service provider facilities to minimize the potential impact of the event. These actions will be within the existing roles and responsibilities of the area agency and its service providers. In the event the President of the United States or Governor of the State of Florida declares a disaster or state of emergency, the Department of Elder Affairs may exercise authority over an area agency or service provider to implement emergency relief measures and/or activities. 14 01/01/2002 OAA 203.021 L D 5 In either of these cases, only the Secretary, Deputy Secretary or his /her designe,"f the Department of Elder Affairs shall have such authority to order the implementation of such measures. All actions directed by the agency under this section shall be for the purpose of ensuring the health, safety and welfare of the elderly in the potential or actual disaster area. F.Volunteers The recipient will promote the use of volunteers as prescribed in Section 306(a)(12), Older Americans Act and Section 430.07, Florida Statutes. In addition, the recipient will increase the use of volunteers in the county by providing training, technical assistance and funding, where possible. G.Business Hours Recipients who are lead agencies, as defined in 430.203(9), F. S. or who provide elder helpline services pursuant to this agreement must also maintain minimum business hours from 8:00 AM until 5:00 PM, Monday through Friday. H.Client Information Registration and Tracking System (CIRTS) and Management Information Systems. For all program contracts incorporating this agreement by reference for which collection of client data in CIRTS is required: 1.The recipient will ensure the collection and maintenance of consumer and service information on a monthly basis from the Client Information Registration and Tracking System (CIRTS) or any such system designated by the agency. Maintenance includes valid exports and backups of all data and systems according to agency standards. 2.Recipients must enter all required data per the agency's CIRTS Policy Guidelines for consumers and services in the CIRTS database. The data must be entered into the CIRTS before the recipients submit their request for payment and expenditure reports to the recipient. The recipient shall establish time frames to assure compliance with due dates for the requests for payment and expenditure reports to the agency. 3. Recipients will run monthly CIRTS reports and verify consumer and service data in the CIRTS is accurate. This report must be submitted to the recipient with the monthly request for payment and expenditure report and must be reviewed by the recipient before the sub - ecipient's request for payment and expenditure reports can be approved by the recipient. 4.Failure to ensure the collection and maintenance of the CIRTS data may result in the agency enacting the "Enforcement" clause of this agreement (see Section III, C.). 5.Computer System Backup and Recovery Each recipient and sub - ecipient, among other requirements, must anticipate and prepare for the loss of information processing capabilities. The routine backing up of data and software is required to recover from losses or outages of the computer system. Data and software essential to the continued operation of recipient functions must be backed up. The security controls over the backup resources shall be as stringent as the protection required of the primary resources. It is 15 01/01/2002 OAA 203.02,L. 6D 5 recommended that a copy of the backed up data be stored in a secure, offsite location. The recipient and sub - ecipient(s) shall maintain written policies and procedures for computer system backup and recovery. These policies and procedures shall be made available to the agency upon request. (.Consumer Outcomes 1. The recipient will develop consumer outcome measures consistent with those developed by the agency. 2.As required by the legislature for performance -based program budgeting, the agency will set targets for the performance of outcome measures. The recipient will be responsible for achieving these targets and will incorporate into subcontracts as necessary. J. Management Objectives The recipient shall: -Ensure the recipient's Board completes an annual performance evaluation of the recipient's executive director; -Ensure effective communication between recipient's staff and Board; -Ensure adequate planning and preparation occurs in the development of the area plan and area plan amendments within agency established time frames. E. 16D 5 01/01/2002 OAA 203.02 1 IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this 33 page contract to be executed by their undersigned officials as duly authorized. RECIPIENT: Collier County Board Of County Commissioners NAME: James N. Coletta TITLE: Chairman DATE: ••��•Z6�2. ° °2-- AREA AGENCY ON AGING FOR SOUTHWEST FLORIDA, INC. Dba SENIOR SOLUTIONS OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA 0 SIGNED BY: NAME: GINGER KOCH FEDERAL ID NUMBER: 59- 6000558 RECIPIENT FISCAL YEAR ENDING DATE: September (Revised 12/01) TITLE: Board President DATE: lo?-31- D ATTE DWI t�',•.81�OCk�,��t,'iC 30 Deputy CI--- e+'�•... Approved as to legal form and sufficiency by; Ramiro Manalich Chief Assistant County Attorney 17 Atts* gg to Cha irk •; s1Pat" Mly. MAR 0 6 angq 16D 5 01/01/2002 OAA 203.02 Attachment I CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING CERTIFICATION FOR CONTRACTS, GRANTS, LOANS AND COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her knowledge and belief, that: (1) No federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any state or federal agency, a member of congress, an officer or employee of congress, an employee of a member of congress, or an officer or employee of the state legislator, in connection with the awarding of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. (2) If any funds other than federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of congress, an officer or employee of congress, or an employee of a member of congress in connection with this federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form -LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions. (3) The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award documents for all sub - awards at all tiers (including subcontracts, sub - grants, and contracts under grants, loans and cooperative agreements) and that all sub - recipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code. Any person who fails to file the required certification shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less than $10,000 and not more th $100,00 for each such failure. December 31, 2001 Signat a Date Barry Williams OAA 203.02 Name of Authorized Individual Application or Contract Number Collier County Government, Collier County Services for Seniors, Bldg H Name of Address of Organization 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 DOEA Form 103, (Revised Jan 2001) W 01/01/2002 16D 5 OAA 203.02 INSTRUCTIONS ATTACHMENT II CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION CONTRACTS /SUBCONTRACTS Each recipient whose contract equals or exceeds $25,000 in federal monies must sign this debarment certification prior to contract execution. Independent auditors who audit federal programs regardless of the dollar amount are required to sign a debarment certification form. Neither the Department of Elder Affairs nor its contract recipients can contract with sub - recipients if they are debarred or suspended by the federal government. 2. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance is placed when this contract is entered into. If it is later determined that the signed knowingly rendered an erroneous certification, the Federal Government may pursue available remedies, including suspension and/or debarment. 3. The recipient shall provide immediate written notice to the contract manager at any time the recipient learns that its certification was erroneous when submitted or has become erroneous by reason of changed circumstances. 4. The terms "debarred," "suspended," "ineligible," "person," "principal," and "voluntarily excluded," as used in this certification, have the meanings set out in the Definitions and Coverage sections of rules implementing Executive Order 12549 and 45 CFR (Code of Federal Regulations), Part 76. You may contact the contract manager for assistance in obtaining a copy of those regulations. 5. The recipient further agrees by submitting this certification that, it shall not knowingly enter into any subcontract with a person who is debarred, suspended, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this contract unless authorized by the Federal Government. 6. The recipient further agrees by submitting this certification that it will require each sub - ecipient of this contract whose payment will equal or exceed $25,000 in federal monies, to submit a signed copy of this certification with each contract. 7. The Department of Elder Affairs and its contract recipients may rely upon a certification of a recipient/sub- recipients that is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily exclude from contracting /subcontracting unless it knows that the certification is erroneous. H. If the recipient is an Area Agency on Aging (AAA), the AAA may rely upon a certification of a recipient/sub - ecipient entity that is not debarred, suspended, ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from contracting /subcontracting unless the AAA knows that the certification is erroneous. The signed certifications of all sub - recipients shall be kept on file with recipient. DOER FORM 112A (Revised April 2001) 19 16D 5 01/01/2002 OAA 203.02 CERTIFICATION REGARDING DEBARMENT, SUSPENSION, INELIGIBILITY AND VOLUNTARY EXCLUSION CONTRACTS /SUBCONTRACTS This certification is required by the regulation implementing Executive Order 12549, Debarment and Suspension, signed February; 18, 1986. The guidelines were published in the May 29, 1987 Federal Register (52 Fed. Reg., pages 20360- 20369). (1) The prospective recipient certifies, by signing this certification, that neither he nor his principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in contracting with the Department of Elder Affairs by any federal department or agency. (2) Where the prospective recipient is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective recipient shall attach an explanation to this certification. Signature- Date �� -- James N. Coletta, Chairman Name and Title of Authorized Individual (Print or type) Collier County Government /Services for Seniors Name of Organization Approved as to legal form and sufficiency: DWW R04 Kv Deputy Att"t as to Chairs "# $1004M «tly. Ramiro Manalich, Chief Assistant County Attorney DOEA FORM 112B (Revised April 2001) 20 01/01/2002 December 2001 Audit Attachment OAA 203702 D 16 5 Attachment III The administration of funds awarded by the agency to the recipient may be subject to audits and /or monitoring as described in this section by the agency, and other authorized state personnel or federal personnel, as described in this section. MONITORING In addition to reviews of audits conducted in accordance with OMB Circular A -133 and Section 215.97, F.S., as revised (see "AUDITS" below), monitoring procedures may include, but not be limited to, on -site visits by agency staff, limited scope audits as defined by OMB Circular A -133, as revised, and/or other procedures. By entering into this agreement, the recipient agrees to comply and cooperate with any monitoring procedures /processes deemed appropriate by the agency. In the event the agency determines that a limited scope audit of the recipient is appropriate, the recipient agrees to comply with any additional instructions provided by the agency to the recipient regarding such audit. The recipient further agrees to comply and cooperate with any inspections, reviews, investigations, or audits deemed necessary by the Comptroller, Auditor General or federal personnel. OTHER REQUIREMENTS If the recipient is a non profit organization, the Oath of Not for Profit Status form (EXHIBIT 2 of this attachment) must be completed and returned to the agency with the signed contract. AUDITS PART I: FEDERALLY FUNDED This part is applicable if the recipient is a State or local government or a non - profit organization as defined in OMB Circular A -133, as revised. J. In the event that the recipient expends $300,000 or more in Federal awards in its fiscal year, the recipient must have a single or program- specific audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A -133, as revised. Federal funds awarded through the agency by this agreement, if any, are indicated in Section II. A. of the contract(s) of which this document is an attachment. In determining the Federal awards expended in its fiscal year, the recipient shall consider all sources of Federal awards, including Federal funds received from the agency. The determination of amounts of Federal awards expended should be in accordance with the guidelines established by OMB Circular A -133, as revised. An audit of the recipient conducted by the Auditor General in accordance with the provisions OMB Circular A -133, as revised, will meet the requirements of this part. K. In connection with the audit requirements addressed in Part I, paragraph 1., the recipient shall fulfill the requirements relative to auditee responsibilities as provided in Subpart C of OMB Circular A- 133, as revised. 12. If the recipient expends less than $300,000 in Federal awards in its fiscal year, an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A -133, as revised, is not required. In the event that the recipient expends less than $300,000 in Federal awards in its fiscal year and elects to have an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of OMB Circular A -133, as revised, the cost of the audit must be paid from non - Federal funds (i.e., the cost of such an audit must be paid from recipient resources obtained from other than Federal entities). 21 01/01/2002 OAA 203. 60 5 13. Information regarding audit requirements contained in OMB Circular A -133 and 215.97, Florida Statutes (F. S.), can be obtained from the following web - sites: http• / /www.whitehouse.gov /omb /circulars/ and: http: / /www.leg.state.fl.us/ PART II: STATE FUNDED This part is applicable if the recipient is a non -state entity as defined by Section 215.97, Florida Statutes. 1. In the event that the recipient expends a total amount of State awards (i.e., State financial assistance provided to the recipient to carry out a State project) equal to or in excess of $300,000 in any fiscal year of such recipient, the recipient must have a State single or project- specific audit for such fiscal year in accordance with Section 215.97, Florida Statutes; applicable rules of the Executive Office of the Governor and the Comptroller, and Chapter 10.600, Rules of the Auditor General. State grants and aids amounts awarded through the agency by this agreement are indicated in Section II., A. of the contract(s) of which this agreement is an attachment. In determining the State awards expended in its fiscal year, the recipient shall consider all sources of State awards, including State funds received from the agency, other state agencies, and other non -state entities except that State awards received by a non -state entity for Federal program matching requirements shall be excluded from consideration. 2. In connection with the audit requirements addressed in Part Il, paragraph 2, the recipient shall ensure that the audit complies with the requirements of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes. This includes submission of a reporting package as defined by Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, and Chapter, 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for - profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, to include an auditor's examination attestation report, management assertion report (alternatively, management's assertion may be included in the management representation letter), and a schedule of State financial assistance. The agency additionally requires a supplemental schedule of functional expenses be prepared, by service, as defined by the agency, including units of service delivered. This supplemental schedule shall be prepared using the same methodology as used in determining the contractual rates. The auditor's examination attestation report must indicate whether management's assertion as to compliance with the following requirements is fairly stated, in all material respects: activities allowed or unallowed; allowable costs /cost principles; matching (if applicable), and; reporting. 3. If the recipient expends less than $300,000 in State awards in its fiscal year, an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, is not required. In the event that the recipient expends less than $300,000 in State awards in its fiscal year and elects to have an audit conducted in accordance with the provisions of Section 215.97, Florida Statutes, the cost of the audit must be paid from non -State funds (i.e., the cost of such an audit must be paid from the recipient's resources obtained from other than State entities).. 4. If an audit is not required or performed, the head of the recipient entity or organization must provide a written attestation, under penalty of perjury, that the recipient has complied with the allowable cost provisions (congruent with the Department of Elder Affair's Client Services Manual, the Comptroller's Voucher Processing Handbook, and OMB Circular A -122 or A -87, whichever is applicable). EXHIBIT 1 to this attachment provides an example attestation document that should be used by the agency head or authorized signatory for contracts to attest to compliance with these provisions. 22 01/01/2002 PART III: REPORT SUBMISSION OAA 203..02 160 1. Copies of reporting packages for audits conducted in accordance with OMB Circular A -133, as revised, and required by PART I of this attachment shall be submitted, when required by Section .320 (d), OMB Circular A -133, as revised, by or on behalf of the recipient directly to each of the following within 45 days of receipt of the report but no later than nine (8) months of recipient's fiscal year end: A. The Senior Solutions of SW Florida at the following address: Senior Solutions of SW Florida Attn.: Fiscal Specialist 2285 First Street Fort Myers, Florida 33901 B. The Federal Audit Clearinghouse designated in OMB Circular A -133, as revised (the number of copies required by Sections .320 (d)(1) and (2), OMB Circular A -133, as revised, should be submitted to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse), at the following address: Federal Audit Clearinghouse Bureau of the Census 1201 East 10th Street Jeffersonville, IN 47132 C. Other Federal agencies and pass- through entities in accordance with Sections .320 (e) and (f), OMB Circular A -133, as revised. 2. The recipient shall submit a copy of the reporting package described in Section .320 (c), OMB Circular A -133, as revised, and any management letters issued by the auditor, to the agency at the following address within 45 days of receipt of the report but no later than nine (8) months of recipient's fiscal year end: Senior Solutions of SW Florida Attn.: Fiscal Specialist 2285 First Street Fort Myers, Florida 33901 C. Copies of audits and reporting packages required by PART II of this attachment shall be submitted by or on behalf of the recipient directly to each of the following within 45 days of receipt of the report but no later than nine (8) months of recipient's fiscal year end:: A. The Senior Solutions of SW Florida at the following address: Senior Solutions of SW Florida Attn.: Fiscal Specialist 2285 First Street Fort Myers, Florida 33901 2. The Auditor General's Office at the following address: State of Florida Auditor General Room 574, Claude Pepper Building 111 West Madison Street 23 01/01/2002 OAA 2032 Tallahassee, Florida 32302 -1450 4. Any reports, management letters, or other information required to be submitted to the agency pursuant to this attachment shall be submitted timely in accordance with OMB Circular A -133, 215.97 Florida Statutes, and Chapters 10.550 (local governmental entities) or 10.650 (nonprofit and for - profit organizations), Rules of the Auditor General, as applicable and should indicate the date that the reporting package was delivered to the recipient in correspondence accompanying the package. 5. Recipients, when submitting the financial reporting packages to the agency, should indicate the date that the audit report was delivered to the recipient in correspondence accompanying the audit report. PART IV: RECORD RETENTION The recipient shall retain sufficient records demonstrating its compliance with the terms of this attachment for a minimum period of five (5) years from the date the audit report is issued or longer if requested by the agency in writing, and shall allow the agency or its authorized designee, and the Comptroller or Auditor General access to such records upon request. The recipient shall ensure that audit working papers are made available to the agency or its designee, and the Comptroller or Auditor General upon request, for a minimum period of five (5) years from the date the audit report is issued, or longer if requested in writing by the agency. PART V: SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS OF AGENCY ADMINISTERED PROGRAMS Interest earned on general revenue funds must be returned to the agency. Interest earned on federal funds may be used to expand, improve, or sustain the program from which it is generated. A chart is included in all contracts identifying the funding source(s), program titles, applicable CFDA or CSFA numbers and the amount of funds granted. Specific requirements for match, co- payments, and program income applicable to programs administered by the agency are outlined in the following applicability chart. Brief definitions of terms used in the chart are included. 01 N O M 0 N N O 0 N H O 1" 0 16D 5 Ln N L X O p C L p O d a) N O C N 0) C O U ( O C can w+ 0 O C 0 O U) O C C d fa L a) (6 a) cp C_ O U L L a) Co (6 O i E U O cn U O U N U O C p U C 0 � O U C O c 'Q 0 M L 0 V � C O �' U C OU 2 �' C M ID O O U � _ O C E p ai C n `�= (n f6 W- M C L C cc L U n a E U n CD a) "O L C L N O O " cn a) ca - rn a) 'O `- C a) C cn a) M s C C Lcu C O U c0 C a) U) >.. c5�+ cn U U ?+ U U O: C a) C U a) a) n ,U O 4= C U N � d cn a) C- U) E E��cn �C E UC �a) p U) ca O a) C < a) c U cv'o a) o U)) U C � cu E E L ''� 7 L O L m .O L f4 C ) O L N G to >' C N C �, rte+ �, >' C , >, d 0 0) a C .L '� U c i �� " E C. 3 U) `+- -n .0 L — OL co cn i1- •►+ CU OU O to L O C b ca OU m ) O C C O pCU >, C 'D a ca C a) E Op E O .� > a) a) E E to «. x ca C a) O E U E a) cn E L 'SAC M cn — E a) C c6 cn a) C 4- >, p L U ._ >+ i cn f6 C -0 :3 Q O N O O cn C_ C_ -C O � a) .0 •r � fn O U_0 n N O O +J m C C C U a) � -L E C C C V C � o L) t V cu >, "� >, � () a) L3 t cn c6 'O w a L)= L-Q aa)) �•`� a) i C_ O v- ,C EE =•n aa)) vE U) O cn a) cu E — >, O y c6 ai .�. r- 0) C O E =3 W 0 L vi QO•U = = U 70 U r_ v o V 2 C� E 8- c U U m X cn ♦ a) ♦ E ♦ E N cn �oa)E U E E a) v n> °) a v E ° c>w _ � � -c)o cn o 0- 16D 5 Ln N N O M O O N 0 0 N O r-I 0 L) C 16Ro5 N M C a) cn � C U 0 a) .a L U C O 0 O -a s. 0 :- �., p •a O U � U v C Q 'L C a) a) L > -0 C> +_ OC) N O O C .Q. O U CL E o N f6 O O a) V cn to C �E C N C o o a) p O a) a) 1— O Q� o 3 0) 4 L cn o >, 0 E U m O (n m N O O N ♦ Q a o) -o C L C � � O 2: E t �_ -a (n a) C O i c 0 U a) L III +-� a C fD O 0 _(n a +� m -0 CD _ C o L 4� C Q) 0 CL O a ° O m ••o a) I E a) Q 0) BEN 3 I o 0 cu O U •- = U c'o � .E C -0 L L cn m co :0 _ L O i -o E° c tm U °x m3 -0 ca w o a f° E E 0 0 ID LO CL o c L U Q. a ..L O O 'z C U E U E v � a) O_ C o m Q 0 Q 0 G cm c C (6 O OU 'D 0 C U 0 j Q O (n -a Z CL a) >cn m ♦ -C E ° N' Q L to N-- p o 0 •/- U D c to U CO c a o p °) a) C O ° O O -a O L U c O E C, Q QC V . a L � � ° co F- m �a v E o Q � U? .0 °-a E CD U) m C C Cr O- E�axi� �� 4-- cC m to 0 � .. "- L L a U •' o f j) 0 C f6 0 L N o N a) -C (a E _NO co O LO O C '- n a) a) 4) Q`0 p o ;� m (n -a L �i co C L O M O a) a) Q Q v0- - L N 'a O Q � r? 'a N U -0 +� -a W O� Ev �� E a ci ♦ O ♦ LL a) a) O' -o aa))M •0 m E 4- (0 o) a) p m O (n O .` () a) a) (n O 0- O a) C — 00000- O 4- a) -C 16Ro5 a) cn � C U 0 a) .a L 0 O -a �., p •a O U v (n p 4- .� C a) a) N C +_ O O C .Q. O U C o N f6 Uoa)� fO L L O a) C �E C N C o o a) p cu 1— O O !E - 3 0) 4 L cn o >, U m O (n m N O O N a) .� 2: E t �_ -a (n a) C O i c 0 U a) L III +-� a C (p _(n a +� m C o L 4� C Q) Q 1 `� m ••o a) 0 U mEa tea° 3 a) c'o �M'�a m co oQ i -o E° c co o w o a 0 0 ID w 'z 0 CO E E U E v � a) O_ C o m Q 0 Q 0 G O O -0 0 'D 0 C U (n -a Z m ° N' Q E (n Co 0 f6 �' p M a) E ~ O p t C O ° O O -a O L U c O p V a ° aU °� o Q � U? .0 °-a E c ca •� C 0 O- a) cn (n 4-- cC cma) _NO a)a) y=am a) a) p o ;� m 'E C 0 O Q v0- L N 'a O a) .-. L +� -a W 000E "EO �, cnQ L, a) t0 O' -o aa))M •0 -a 4- (0 o) a) p O (n O (n O 0- O a) C 0) O 4- a) -C U N — M o C C n L o N -0 N O U -0 O >a O O I_ L —-1.4 ca U p , a) � Q 0 "Q 0 O � N ._ � ° � co m E E >> c U) O a°i c (n a) o �' m ED � � CII co o E Q- c) � Q � cca O O, -a C a) C ._. x p �- L) L) � ca E J ° p a) U (n 0 O CL cLo p-C •C a) a) -a aQ) .� Q a) �,aa))f) �W 3-o (0 ED- o c� o0 -a)= E X- � -0 a) -0 a) (D ° o .S ,. U m) L C -a 0 D o E c6 c'u� mot- �-Z c w�0� >0 0 0 (6 OU 00 a `• 0ai L- U ° U a) C: o >cn C a) a) U >, 0 U U t (6 a) C O- U (n ) ID LO C -0 C N cn 0 O -0 a) U w- � N O p (n 00 p p E-0 C U U V o U� a) ca p O a) 0° U-0 a) O E O Q C M O OU N >, `) " (6 a) U U Q � E 0 a) Ems. U 0 3° (n :a C c -a c E a c L a) ��_ (0 >.--a C L- a) -C -0 -0 O Q. 1«- "0 -a ((nn C a- M cn •a) C E 2 M x o °' O C O 0 O a) •0 ca > >, 0 cn O >' a 4U- C .E j Q En a) N C O Q) ca (n C >+ Q O.�QL C to cn �I O O) o O O cn C c0 O 'a »' a O U Q 'O U (n O N a) to a) co c a) U Q a) >, N ca) c 0 v O os L ) L 0 )E y Q p 3 R N C N U O O O O N a) U O a) «. cn L o a) o .a) c� ��Ea.QE m E .0 O m Q- u) .WL Yfl YL cu G.. o� c. N a) U a) � cn V C O m C U (n 01/01/2002 MANAGEMENT ATTESTATION LETTER Contractor Agreement Number: OAA 203.02 that OAA 203.02 Attachment III EXHIBIT -1 16D 5 James N. Coletta , hereby attest under penalty of perjury (recipient's authorized representative) Collier County Government /Svcs for Seni fAcl on the criteria (recipient agency name) set forth in the agency's Audit Attachment, PARTS I and II, that: A. The above named recipient agency is not required to provide an audit report or reporting package because [check applicable statement(s)]: the above -named entity does not expend $300,000 or more in total federal awards in its fiscal year and therefore is not required to have a single or program- specific audit performed in accordance in OMB Circular A- 133, as revised, and /or; the above -named entity does not expend a total amount equal to or in excess of $300,000 in state awards in its fiscal year and therefore is not required to have a State single or program- specific audit in accordance with section 215.97, Florida Statutes. B. The recipient has complied with the allowable cost provisions [congruent with State and Federal law, the department's Client Services Manual, the Comptroller's Voucher Processing Handbook, and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A -122, A -110, or A -87, whichever is applicable]. By making this statement the recipient has considered not only funding or awards from the agency, but all sources of Federal and State funding or awards. Fiscal year ended 9-30-02 (Mon , daje, year) (Signature oZ�- t'v /O,Z Chairman, Board of County Commissioners (Title) December 31, 2001 (Date) 27 ATTEST: - DWIGHT E. BROOK CLERK Deputy,C s Attset. is to Chaim.0 ' sipetwe ..1y. Approved for form and legal sufficiency with respect to Collier County /�� wZr—��. ( / Ck. Acsq. County Attorney 01/01/2002 OAA 203.02 1 5 Oath of Not for Profit Status Contract or Agreement Number: Attachment III Exhibit - 2 As an authorized representative for the Recipient identified herein, and in the above referenced document(s), I do hereby swear under oath that this entity is currently a "not for profit "(non- profit) organization as defined in section 501(c)(3)of the Internal Revenue Code. If this non - profit status changes for any reason during the life of the above referenced contract or agreement, the Department of Elder Affairs will be notified in writing immediately. Name of Recipient entity Signature of Authorized Representative Printed name and Title of Authorized Representative Date of Oath W 01/01/2002 OAA 203.02 16D 5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING DATA INTEGRITY COMPLIANCE FOR CONTRACTS, GRANTS, LOANS AND Attachment IV COOPERATIVE AGREEMENTS Federal Grants Management regulations and the Florida Single Audit Act require financial management systems for recipients of state and federal funds to be capable of providing certain information, assuring accuracy and accountability, in accordance with prescribed reporting requirements. These reporting requirements may require certain calculations or the provision of specified data to fully disclose the financial results of each federally funded or state - sponsored program. To ensure the integrity of the State's accounting systems are not compromised, the following language was composed to protect the interests of the State and the elderly population of Florida who rely on the programs in place to assist them in preserving the quality and duration of their lives. The undersigned, an authorized representative of the recipient named in the contract or agreement to which this form is an attachment, hereby certifies that: (1) The recipient and any sub - recipients of services under this contract have financial management systems capable of providing certain information, including: (1) accurate, current, and complete disclosure of the financial results of each grant- funded project or program in accordance with the prescribed reporting requirements; (2) the source and application of funds for all contract supported activities; and (3) the comparison of outlays with budgeted amounts for each award. The inability to process information in accordance with these requirements could result in a return of grant funds that have not been accounted for properly. (2) Management Information Systems used by the recipient, sub- recipient(s), or any outside entity on which the recipient is dependent for data that is to be reported, transmitted or calculated, have been assessed and verified to be capable of processing data accurately, including year -date dependent data. For those systems identified to be non - compliant, recipient(s) will take immediate action to assure data integrity. (3) If this contract includes the provision of hardware, software, firmware, microcode or imbedded chip technology, the undersigned warrants that these products are capable of processing year -date dependent data accurately. All versions of these products offered by the recipient (represented by the undersigned) and purchased by the State will be verified for accuracy and integrity of data prior to transfer. In the event of any decrease in functionality related to time and date related codes and internal subroutines that impede the hardware or software programs from operating properly, the recipient agrees to immediately make required corrections to restore hardware and software programs to the same level of functionality as warranted herein, at no charge to the State, and without interruption to the ongoing business of the state, time being of the essence. (4) The recipient and any sub - recipients) of services under this contract warrant their policies and procedures include a disaster plan to provide for service delivery to continue in case of an emergency including emergencies arising from data integrity compliance issues. The recipient shall require that the language of this certification be included in all subcontracts, sub - grants, and other agreements and that all sub - contractors shall certify compliance accordingly. This certification is a material representation of fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction was made or entered into. Submission of this certification is a prerequisite for making or entering into this transaction imposed by Department of Management Services (DMS) Memorandum No. 6 (98 -99) and OMB Circulars A -102 and A -110. Collier County Government Collier County Services for Seniors, Bldg H Barry Williams 3301 Tamiami Trail East NarTle and Addr of Recipient Naples, Fl 34112 77 Sr)rial Services Director // /919-natur& Title Date December 31, 2001 29 01/01/2002 Name of Authorized Signer (Revised July2001) OAA 203.02 16D 5 ATTACHMENT V MINIMUM GUIDELINES FOR RECIPIENT GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES APPLICABLE TO ALL ADVERSE ACTIONS DEEMED TERMINATIONS, SUSPENSIONS, OR REDUCTIONS IN SERVICE Medicaid Waiver clients have the right to request a fair hearing from the Department of Children and Families( DCAF) Office of Appeal Hearings in addition to or as an alternative to these procedures. NOTICE TO THE RECIPIENT OF THE ADVERSE ACTON TO BE TAKEN AND EXPLANATION OF THE GRIEVANCE PROCEDURES FOR REVIEWING THAT DECISION • The recipient must be informed by the decision maker of the action, in writing, no less than 10 calendar* days prior to the date the adverse action will be taken. (Prior notice is not applicable where the health or safety of the individual is endangered if action is not taken immediately; however, notice must be made as soon thereafter as practicable.) • Services cannot be reduced or terminated, nor any adverse action taken during the 10 day period. • The Notice must contain: a statement of what action is intended to be taken; the reasons for the intended action; an explanation of: 1) the individual's right to a grievance review if requested in writing and delivered within 10 calendar* days of the Notice postmark (assistance in writing, submitting and delivering the request must be offered and available to the individual); 2) in Medicaid Waiver actions, the individual's right to request a fair hearing from DCAF; 3) the individual's right, after a grievance review, for further appeal; 4) the right to seek redress through the courts if applicable; a statement that current benefits will continue if a grievance review is requested, and will continue until a final decision is made regarding the adverse action; and a statement that the individual may represent himself /herself or use legal counsel, a relative, a friend, or other qualified representative in the requested review proceedings. • All records of the above activities must be preserved in the client's file. GRIEVANCE REVIEW PROCEDURE UPON TIMELY RECEIPT OF A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR REVIEW • Within 7 calendar* days of the receipt of a request for review, the provider must acknowledge receipt of the request by a written statement delivered to the requester. This statement must also provide notice of: the time and place scheduled for the review; the designation of one or more impartial reviewers who have not been involved in the decision at issue; the opportunity to examine, at a reasonable time before the review, the individual's own case record, and to a copy of such case record at no cost to the individual; the opportunity to informally present argument, evidence, or witnesses without undue interference at a reasonable time before or during the review; a contact person for any accommodations required under the Americans with Disabilities Act; and at 01/01/ 2002 OAA 203160 5 assistance, if needed, in order to attend the review; and the stopping of the intended action until all appeals are exhausted. • All grievance reviews must be conducted at a reasonable time, date and place by one or more impartial reviewers who have not been directly involved in the initial determination of the action in question. • The reviewer(s) must provide written notification to the requester, within 7 calendar* days after the grievance review, stating: the decision, the reasons therefore in detail; the effect the decision has on current benefits, if favorable, or the circumstances regarding continuation of current benefits until all appeals are exhausted; the individual's right to appeal an adverse decision to the Area Agency on Aging by written request within 7 calendar* days, except in decisions involving the professional judgement of a legal assistance provider; the availability of assistance in writing, submitting and delivering the appeal to the appropriate agency; the opportunity to be represented by himself /herself or by legal counsel, a relative, a friend or other qualified representative; for legal assistance service appeals, the individual's right to file a grievance with the Florida Bar regarding complaints related to the actual legal representation provided. PROCEDURE FOR APPEALS OF A GRIEVANCE REVIEW DECISION UPON TIMELY RECEIPT OF A WRITTEN APPEAL TO THE AREA AGENCY ON AGING • Within 7 calendar* days of the receipt of a notice of appeal of a grievance review decision, the AAA must acknowledge receipt of the notice of appeal by a written statement delivered to the appellant. This statement must also provide notice of: the time and place scheduled for the appeal; the designation of one or more impartial AAA officials who have not been involved in the decision at issue; the opportunity to examine at a reasonable time before the appeal the individual's own case record to date, and to a copy of such case record at no cost to the individual; the opportunity to informally present argument, evidence, or witnesses without undue interference during the appeal; assistance, if needed, in order to attend the appeal; and the stopping of the intended action until all appeals are exhausted. • All appeals of grievance reviews must be conducted at a reasonable time, date and place by one or more impartial AAA officials who have not been directly involved in the initial determination of the action in question. • The designated AAA official(s) must provide written notification to the requester within 7 calendar* days after considering the grievance review appeal, stating: the decision, and the reasons therefore in detail; the effect the decision has on current benefits, if favorable, or the circumstances regarding continuation of current benefits until all appeals are exhausted; the individual's right to appeal, if applicable. • Except for Medicaid Waiver actions, the decision of the AAA shall be the final decision; and the availability of assistance in requesting a fair hearing, including a notice regarding accommodations as required by the ADA. • All records of the above activities must be preserved and remain confidential. A copy of the final decision must be placed in the client's file. 31 R- 01/01/2002 OAA 203.021 6 D 5 * In computing any period of time prescribed or allowed by these guidelines, the last day of the period so computed shall be included unless it is a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, in which event the period shall run until the end of the next day which is neither a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday. September, 2001 STATE OF FLORIDA ELDER AFFAID11 R Attachment A Department of Elder Affairs Logos STATE OF FLORIDA ELDER AFFAIRS 3232 01/01/2002 tNIOfl SOLUTIONS of c5outbmed cRm ds 33 OAA 203.02 16D 5 Barefoot Beach Preserve Park Barefoot Beach Access South Marco Beach Access Boardwalk Deck & Handrail Replacement COLLIER COUNTY BID NO. 02 -3323 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Design Professional: Collier County Parks and Recreation Dept. 3300 Santa Barbara Blvd. Naples, FL 34116 (941) 353 -0404 COLLIER COUNTY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, Florida 34112 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.69 6-1 A. PUBLIC NOTICE /LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT (PAGE 1 ONLY) B. INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS C. BID PROPOSAL, BID SCHEDULE AND OTHER DOCUMENTS D. AGREEMENT E. AGREEMENT EXHIBITS EXHIBIT A: Performance and Payment Bond Forms EXHIBIT B: Insurance Requirement Form EXHIBIT C: Release and Affidavit Form EXHIBIT D: Contractor Application for Payment Form EXHIBIT E: Change Order Form EXHIBIT F: Certificate of Substantial Completion Form EXHIBIT G: Final Payment Checklist EXHIBIT H: General Terms and Conditions EXHIBIT I: Supplemental Terms and Conditions EXHIBIT J: Technical Specifications EXHIBIT K: Permits EXHIBIT L: Standard Details (if applicable) EXHIBIT M: Plans and Specifications prepared by Collier County Parks & Recreation Dept. and identified as follows: Barefoot Beach Preserve Park; Barefoot Beach Access & South Marco Beach Access, Boardwalk Deck & Handrail Replacement as shown on sheets A -1 and, R -1 through R -5. 2/25/2002 9:08 AM PART A - PUBLIC NOTICE/ LEGAL ADVERTISEMENT (PAGE ONE ONLY) 160 61 INVITATION TO BID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Barefoot Beach Preserve Park Barefoot Beach Access South Marco Beach Access Boardwalk Deck & Handrail Replacement COUNTY BID NO.02 -3323 Separate sealed proposals for the above referenced Boardwalk Deck & Handrail Replacement, addressed to Mr. Steve Carnell, Purchasing Director, will be received at the Collier County Government Complex, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Purchasing Building, Purchasing Department, Naples, Florida 34112, until 2:30 P.M. LOCAL TIME, on the 71h day of February, 2002 at which time all proposals will be publicly opened and read aloud. Any bids received after the time and date specified will not be accepted and shall be returned unopened to the Bidder. A non - mandatory pre -bid conference shall be held at the Purchasing Conference Room, Purchasing Building at 10:00 A.M. LOCAL TIME on the 25th day of January, 2002 at which time all prospective Bidders may have questions answered regarding the Bidding Documents for this Project. Sealed envelopes containing bids shall be marked or endorsed "Proposal for Collier County Government, Collier County, Florida, Barefoot Beach Preserve Park, Barefoot Beach Access, South Marco Beach Access Boardwalk Deck & Handrail Replacement, County Bid No. 02 -3323, and Bid Date of February 7, 2002. No bid shall be considered unless it is made on the Bid Schedule which is included in the Bidding Documents. The Bid Schedule (GC -P -1 through GC -P -12) shall be removed from the Bidding Documents prior to submittal. One contract will be awarded for all Work. Bidding Documents may be examined in the office of Department of Parks and Recreation, or at the Purchasing Department, Purchasing Building, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112. Copies of the Bidding Documents may be obtained only at the offices of the Purchasing Department, upon payment of $50.00 for each set of documents to offset the cost of reproduction. Return of the documents is not required, and the amount paid for the documents is nonrefundable. The following plan room services have obtained copies of the Bidding Documents for the work contemplated herein: Collier Building Industry Assoc. 2465 Trade Center Way Naples, FL 34109 Construction Market Data Bldg. 219, Suite 170 200 South Hoover Blvd. Tampa, FL 33609 2/25/2002 9:08 AM Lee Building Industry Assoc. 4210 Metro Parkway, Suite 100 Ft. Myers, FL 33916 F.W. Dodge Reports 2830 Winkler Avenue, Suite 104A Ft. Myers, FL 33916 GC -PN -1 Each bid shall be accompanied by a certified or cashiers check or a Bid Bond in an amount not less than five percent (5 %) of the total Bid to be retained as liquidated damages in the event the successful Bidder fails to execute the Agreement and file the required bonds and insu with' ten (10) calendar days after the receipt of the Notice of Award. 6 1 . The successful Bidder shall be required to furnish the necessary Performance and Payment Bonds, as prescribed in the General Conditions of the Contract Documents. All Bid Bonds, Performance and Payment Bonds, Insurance Contracts and Certificates of Insurance shall be either executed by or countersigned by a licensed resident agent of the surety or insurance company having its place of business in the State of Florida. Further, the said surety or insurance company shall be duly licensed and qualified to do business in the State of Florida. Attorneys -in -fact that sign Bid Bonds or Performance and Payment Bonds must file with each bond a certified and effective dated copy of their Power of Attorney. In order to perform public work, the successful Bidder shall, as applicable, hold or obtain such contractor's and business licenses, certifications and registrations as required by State statutes and County ordinances. Before a contract will be awarded for the work contemplated herein, the County shall conduct such investigations as it deems necessary to determine the performance record and ability of the apparent low Bidder to perform the size and type of work specified in the Bidding Documents. Upon request, the Bidder shall submit such information as deemed necessary by the County to evaluate the Bidder's qualifications. The Successful Bidder shall be required to finally complete all Work within ninety -five (95) calendar days from and after the Commencement Date specified in the Notice to Proceed. The County reserves the right to reject all Bids or any Bid not conforming to the intent and purpose of the Bidding Documents, and to postpone the award of the contract for a period of time which, however, shall not extend beyond 90 days from the bid opening date. Dated this 16th day of January 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: /s/ Stephen Y. Carnell Purchasing /General Services Director GC -PN -2 2/25/2002 9:08 AM PART B- INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS 160 6 Section 1. Definitions 1.1 The term "Owner" used herein refers to the Board of County Commissioners, or its duly authorized representative. 1.2 The term "Project Manager" used herein refers to the Owner's duly authorized representative and shall mean a Division Administrator or Department Director acting directly or through duly authorized representatives. 1.3 The term "Design Professional" refers to the licensed professional engineer or architect who is in privity with the Owner for the purpose of designing and /or monitoring the construction of the project. Any or all duties of the Design Professional referenced under this Agreement may be assumed at any time by the Project Manager on behalf of the Owner. Conversely, the Project Manager may formally assign any of his /her duties specified in this agreement to the Design Professional. 1.4 The term "Bidder" used herein means one who submits a bid directly to the Owner in response to this solicitation. 1.5 The term "Successful Bidder" means the lowest qualified, responsible and responsive Bidder who is awarded the contract by the Board of County Commissioners, on the basis of the Owner's evaluation. 1.6 The term "Bidding Documents" includes the Legal Advertisement, these Instructions to Bidders, the Bid Schedule and the Contract Documents as defined in the Agreement. 1.7 The term "Bid" shall mean a completed Bid Schedule, bound in the Bidding Documents, properly signed, providing the Owner a proposed cost for providing the services required in the Bidding Documents. Section 2. Preparation of Bids 2.1 The Bids must be submitted on the standard form herein furnished by the Owner (pages GC- P-1 to GC -P -12 as bound in these Bidding Documents). The Bidder shall complete the Bid in ink or by typewriter and shall sign the Bid correctly. Bid Schedules submitted on disk/CD shall be accompanied by a hard copy of the completed Bid Schedule, which shall be signed and dated by the Bidder. The Bid may be rejected if it contains any omission, alteration of form, conditional bid or irregularities of any kind. Bids must be submitted in sealed envelopes, marked with the Bid Number, Project Name and Bid opening Date and Time, and shall be addressed to the Collier County Purchasing Department, Purchasing Building, Collier County Government Complex, 3301 Tamiami Trail, East, Naples, Florida 34112. If forwarded by mail, the sealed envelope containing the Bid must be enclosed in another sealed envelope addressed as above. Bids received at the location specified herein after the time specified for bid opening will be returned to the bidder unopened and shall not be considered. GC -IB -1 2125/2002 9:08 AM 2.2 Collier County requires all vendors doing business with the County to be Year 2000 compliant. Vendors shall take all necessary and appropriate steps to proactively ensure that all technologies, systems, equipment and processes critical to the vendor's ability to provide required products /services to the County will be able to function properly as of January 1, 200 6 D 6 2.3 Collier County has implemented a Vendor Performance Evaluation System or all contracts awarded in excess of $25,000. To this end, vendors will be evaluated on their performance upon completion /termination of agreement. Section 3. Bid Deposit Requirements 3.1 No Bid shall be considered or accepted unless at the time of Bid filing the same shall be accompanied by a cashiers check, a cash bond posted with the County Clerk, a certified check payable to Owner on some bank or trust company located in the State of Florida insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, or Bid Bond, in an amount not less than 5% of the bidder's maximum possible award (base bid plus all add alternates) (collectively referred to herein as the "Bid Deposit "). The Bid Deposit shall be retained by Owner as liquidated damages if the successful Bidder fails to execute and deliver to County the Agreement, or fails to deliver the required Performance and Payment Bonds or Certificates of Insurance, all within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of the Notice of Award. Bid Bonds shall be executed by a corporate surety licensed under the laws of the State of Florida to execute such bonds, with conditions that the surety will, upon demand, forthwith make payment to Owner upon said bond. Bid Deposits of the three (3) lowest Bidders shall be held until the Agreement has been executed by the Successful Bidder and same has been delivered to Owner together with the required bonds and insurance, after which all three (3) Bid Deposits shall be returned to the respective Bidders. All other Bid Deposits shall be released within ten (10) working days of the Bid Opening. No Bid including alternates shall be withdrawn within one hundred and twenty (120) days after the public opening thereof. If a Bid is not accepted within said time period it shall be deemed rejected and the Bid Deposit shall be returned to Bidder. In the event that the Owner awards the contract prior to the expiration of the 120 day period without selecting any or all alternates, the Owner shall retain the right to subsequently award said alternates at a later time but no later than 120 days from opening, unless otherwise authorized by the Purchasing Director. 3.2 The Successful Bidder shall execute four (4) copies of the Agreement and deliver it to Owner within the time period noted above. The Owner shall execute all copies and return one fully executed copy of the Agreement to Successful Bidder within thirty (30) working days after receipt of the executed Agreement from Successful Bidder unless any governmental agency having funding control over the Project requires additional time, in which event the Owner shall have such additional time to execute the Agreement as may be reasonably necessary. Section 4. Right to Reject Proposals 4.1 The Owner reserves the right to reject any and all Bids or to waive informalities and negotiate with the apparent lowest, qualified Bidder to such extent as may be necessary for budgetary reasons. GC -I B -2 2/25/2002 9:08 AM Section 5. Signing of Bids 16D 6 5.1 Bids submitted by a corporation must be executed in the corporate name by the president or a vice president, and a corporate seal must be affixed and attested to by the secretary or assistant secretary of the corporation. The corporate address and state of incorporation must be shown below the signature. 5.2 Bid proposals by a partnership must be executed in the partnership name and signed by a general partner whose title must appear under the signature and the official address of the partnership must be shown below said signature. 5.3 If Bidder is an individual, its signature shall be inscribed. 5.4 If signature is by an agent or other than an officer of corporation or general partner of partnership, a properly notarized power of attorney must be submitted with the Bid. 5.5 All Bids shall have names typed or printed below all signatures. 5.6 All Bids shall state the Bidder's contractor license number. 5.7 Failure to follow the provisions of this section shall be grounds for rejecting the Bid as irregular or unauthorized. Section 6. Withdrawal of Proposals Any Bid may be withdrawn at any time prior to the hour fixed in the Legal Advertisement for the opening of Bids, provided that the withdrawal is requested in writing, properly executed by the Bidder and received by Owner prior to Bid Opening. The withdrawal of a Bid will not prejudice the right of a Bidder to file a new Bid prior to the time specified for Bid opening. Section 7. Late Bids No Bid shall be accepted that fails to be submitted prior to the time specified in the Legal Advertisement. Section 8. Interpretation of Contract Documents 8.1 No interpretation of the meaning of the plans, specifications or other Bidding Documents shall be made to a Bidder orally. Any such oral or other interpretations or clarifications shall be without legal effect. All requests for interpretations or clarifications shall be in writing, addressed to the Purchasing Department, to be given consideration. All such requests for interpretations or clarification must be received at least ten (10) calendar days prior to the Bid opening date. Any and all such interpretations and supplemental instructions shall be in the form of written addendum which, if issued, shall be sent by mail or fax to all known Bidders at their respective addresses furnished for such purposes no later than three (3) working days prior to the date fixed for the opening of Bids. Such written addenda shall be binding on Bidder and shall become a part of the Bidding Documents. GC -I B -3 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 8.2 It shall be the responsibility of each Bidder to ascertain, prior to submitting its Bid t4&t it has received all addenda issued and it shall acknowledge same in its Bid. 16U 6 8.3 As noted in the Legal Advertisement, attendance by all bidders at the Pre -Bid Conference is non - mandatory. Section 9. Examination of Site and Contract Documents 9.1 By executing and submitting its Bid, each Bidder certifies that it has: a. Examined all Bidding Documents thoroughly; b. Visited the site to become familiar with local conditions that may in any manner affect performance of the Work; C. Become familiar with all federal, state and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations affecting performance of the Work; and d. Correlated all of its observations with the requirements of Bidding documents. No plea of ignorance of conditions or difficulties that may exist or conditions or difficulties that may be encountered in the execution of the Work pursuant to these Bidding Documents as a result of failure to make the necessary examinations and investigations shall be accepted as an excuse for any failure or omission on the part of the Successful Bidder, nor shall they be accepted as a basis for any claims whatsoever for extra compensation or for an extension of time. 9.2 The Owner will make copies of surveys and reports performed in conjunction with this Project available to any Bidder requesting them at cost; provided, however, the Owner does not warrant or represent to any Bidder either the completeness or accuracy of any such surveys and reports. Before submitting its Bid, each Bidder shall, at its own expense, make such additional surveys and investigations as may be necessary to determine its Bid price for the performance of the Work within the terms of the Bidding Documents. Section 10. Material Requirements It is the intention of these Bidding Documents to identify standard materials. When space is provided on the Bid Schedule, Bidders shall specify the materials that they propose to use in the Project. The Owner may declare any Bid non - responsive or irregular if such materials are not specifically named by Bidder. Section 11. Bid Quantities Quantities given in the Bid Schedule, while estimated from the best information available, are approximate only. Payment for unit price items shall be based on the actual number of units installed for the Work. Bids shall be compared on the basis of number of units stated in the Bid Schedule as GC -I B -4 2/25/2002 9:08 AM IOu b set forth in the Bidding Documents. Said unit prices shall be multiplied by the bid quantities for the total Bid price. Any Bid not conforming to this requirement may be rejected. Special attention to all Bidders is called to this provision, for should conditions make it necessary or prudent to revise the unit quantities, the unit prices will be fixed for such increased or decreased quantities. Compensation for such additive or subtractive changes in the quantities shall be limited to the unit prices in the Bid. Subsequent to the issuance of a notice to proceed, the Project Manager shall have the discretion to re- negotiate any unit price(s) where the actual quantity varies by more than 25% from the estimate at the time of bid. Section 12. Award of Contract Any prospective bidder who desires to protest any aspect(s) or provision(s) of the bid invitation shall file his protest with the Purchasing Director in writing prior to the time of the bid opening. Award of contract shall be made to the lowest, responsive and qualified Bidder determined on the basis of the entire Bid and the Owner's investigations of the Bidder. In determining the lowest, responsive and qualified bidder, the Owner shall consider the capability of the Bidder to perform the contract in a timely and responsible manner through its use of subcontractors. The Owner may reject all bids proposing the use of any subcontractors who have been disqualified from bidding the County, disqualified or de- certified for bidding purposes by any public contracting entity, or who has exhibited an inability to perform through any other means. When the contract is awarded by Owner, such award shall be evidenced by a Notice of Award, signed by the Project Manager of Owner and delivered to the intended awardee or mailed to awardee at the business address shown in the Bid. Award of Contract will be made by the Board of County Commissioners in public session. Award recommendations will be posted outside the offices of the Purchasing Department generally on Wednesdays and Thursdays. Any actual or prospective bidder who desires to formally protest the recommended contract award must file a notice of intent to protest with the Purchasing Director within two (2) calendar days (excluding weekends and holidays) of the date that the recommended award is posted. Upon filing of said notice, the protesting party will have five (5) days to file a formal protest and will be given instructions as to the form and content requirements of the formal protest. A copy of the "Protest Policy" is available at the offices of the Purchasing Director. For Bidders who may wish to receive copies of Bids after the Bid opening, The County reserves the right to recover all costs associated with the printing and distribution of such copies. Section 13. Sales Tax Collier County, Florida as a political subdivision of the State of Florida is exempt from the payment of Florida sales tax to its vendors under Chapter 212, Florida Statutes. All successful bidders will be provided a copy of Collier County's Certificate of Exemption ( #21 -07- 019995 -53c) upon contract award. Corporations, Individuals and other entities are impacted by Chapter 212, Florida Statutes according to the type of service, sale of commodity or other contractual arrangement to be made with Collier County. By submittal of a properly executed response to a Bid Proposal from Collier County, Florida the Bidder is acknowledging that it is aware of its statutory responsibilities for sales tax under Chapter 212, Florida Statutes. GC -I B -5 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D b Collier County is also exempt from most Federal excise taxes. By submittal of a properly executed response to a Bid Proposal from Collier County, Florida, the Bidder is acknowledging that it is aware of its responsibilities for Federal excise taxes. Section 14. Exclusion of County Permits in Bid Prices 14.2 To ensure compliance with Section 218.80, F.S., otherwise known as "The Public Bid Disclosure Act ", Collier County will pay for all Collier County permits and fees, including license fees, permit fees, impact fees or inspection fees applicable to this work through an internal budget transfer(s). Hence, bidders shall not include these permit/fee amounts in their bid offer. However, the successful bidder shall retain the responsibility to initiate and complete all necessary and appropriate actions to obtain the required permits other than payment for the items identified in this section. 14.2 The successful bidder shall be responsible for procuring and paying for all necessary permits not issued by Collier County pursuant to the prosecution of the work. Section 15. Use of Subcontractors 15.1 To ensure the work contemplated by this contract is performed in a professional and timely manner, all subcontractors shall be "qualified" as defined in Collier County Ordinance 87 -25, meaning a person or entity that has the capability in all respects to perform fully the contract requirements and has the integrity and reliability to assure good faith performance. A subcontractor's disqualification from bidding by the Owner, or other public contracting entity within the past twelve months shall be considered by the Owner when determining whether the subcontractors are "qualified." 15.2 The Owner may consider the past performance and capability of a subcontractor when evaluating the ability, capacity and skill of the Bidder and its ability to perform the contract within the time required Owner reserves the right to disqualify a Bidder who includes subcontractors in its bid offer which are not "qualified" or who do not meet the legal requirements applicable to and necessitated by this Contract. GC -IB -6 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6-1, BID PROPOSAL BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Barefoot Beach Preserve Park Barefoot Beach Access South Marco Beach Access Boardwalk Deck & Handrail Replacement BID NO. 02 -3323 Full Name of Bidder QUALITY ENTERPRISES USA, INC. Main Business Address 5121 Castello o Drive, Suite 2, Ngn1Ps, FT. '14109 Place of Business same Telephone No. 941 - 435 -72oo Fax No. 941 - 495 -7?n2 State Contractor's License # CBCA57231 To: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (hereinafter called the Owner) The undersigned, as Bidder declares that the only person or parties interested in this Proposal as principals are those named herein, that this Proposal is made without collusion with any other person, firm or corporation; that it has carefully examined the location of the proposed work, the proposed forms of Agreement and Bonds, and the Contract Drawings and Specifications, including Addenda issued thereto and acknowledges receipt below: Addendum Number Date Issued 1 1/28102 Bidder proposes, and agrees if this Proposal is accepted, Bidder will contract with the Owner in the form of the copy of the Agreement included in these Contract Documents, to provide all necessary machinery, tools, apparatus and other means of construction, including utility and transportation services necessary to do all the Work, and furnish all the materials and equipment specified or referred to in the Contract Documents in the manner and time herein prescribed and according to the requirements of the Owner as therein set forth, furnish the Contractor's Bonds and Insurance specified in the General Conditions of the Contract, and to do all other things required of the Contractor by the Contract Documents, and that it will take full payment the sums set forth in the following Bid Schedule: NOTE: If you choose to bid, please submit an ORIGINAL and ONE COPY of your proposal pages. GC -P -1 BID SCHEDULE 16D 6 Barefoot Beach Preserve Park Barefoot Beach Access South Marco Beach Access* Boardwalk Deck & Handrail Replacement Bid No. 02 -3323 Having become familiar with conditions at the project site and having carefully examined the existing boardwalks and the bidding requirements, including the advertisement, instructions to bidders, and the contract documents including the General Conditions, Supplemental Conditions, Specifications, Details, Schedules and Drawings, the undersigned proposes to furnish all materials, labor and equipment for the entire work in accordance with the documents and applicable codes and ordinances for the following lump sum of: Scope of Work: 1. Contractor shall visit the job sites and verify all dimensions and field conditions prior to submitting a bid proposal. 2. The proposal shall include all labor and material to recondition the boardwalks as shown on drawings A -1, and R -1 through R -5. 3. The basic contract shall be to remove all the existing 2"x6" decking planks and top sloped railing and install new 2"x6" "Tri -Max" planks and new matching (same size) railings as manufactured by USPL or approved equivalent. All new members shall be secured by using at a minimum 4.5" long stainless steel screws with Two (2) screws per joist supports. Contractor must field finish all railing edges to a smooth %" + radius and scotch guard the top surface to remove any fiberglass fibers. 4. Remove existing stair risers and treads and install new "Tri - Max "' risers and treads to match existing size and configuration. New supports shall be installed to accommodate new "Tri -Max" risers and treads. The new treads shall be slip resistance and have no deflection. 5. Base bid shall include at a minimum the replacement of fifty (50) severely rusted bolts, nuts and washers with like size stainless steel bolts, nuts and washers as directed by the Project Manager. **TriMax Structural Plastic Lumber (HDPE) with fiberglass filled content is 100% post- consumer recycled plastic lumber. Decking materials shall have a non -skid pattern applied to top surface equal to Carefree C -Deck "Groove and groove" pattern. Base Bid, Barefoot Beach Preserve Park Lump Sum s 162,182.90 Dollars Base Bid, Barefoot Beach Access Lump Sum $16.362.67 Dollars Base Bid, South Marco Beach Access Lump Sum $15,881.41 Dollars Grand Lump Sum $194,427.00 Dollars Note: Collier County Parks and Recreation Department reserves the right to directly purchase any or all material for this project. GC -P -2 (Revised 1 -25 -02) F� 160 6' Alternate "A" Scope of Work: 1. Contractor shall visit the job sites and verify all dimensions and field conditions prior to submitting a bid proposal. 2. The proposal shall include all labor and material to recondition the boardwalks as shown on drawings A -1, and R -1 through R -5. 3. The alternate contract shall be to remove all the existing 2"x6" decking planks and top sloped railing and install new 2 "x6" "IPE" planks and new matching (same size) railings as manufactured by "Iron Woods Timber Molding Limited" Milwaukee, WI. or approved equivalent. All new members shall be secured by using at a minimum 4.5" long stainless steel screws (pre -drill members as per manufacturers recommendations) with Two (2) screws per joist supports. 4. Remove existing stair risers and treads and install new "IPE" risers and treads to match existing size and configuration. 5. Base bid shall include at a minimum the replacement of fifty (50) severely rusted bolts, nuts and washers with like size stainless steel bolts, nuts and washers as directed by the Project Manager. Iron Woods IPE Hardwood Decking Specification Guidelines: A. Moisture Content: All lumber shall be partially air dried to a moisture content of 18% - 25 %. B. End Coating: All lumber is to be supplied with the end sealed with "Anchorseal" or equal aqueous wax log end sealer. C. Mechanical Properties: MC %- 12 %, Bending Strength- 25,360 psi, Modules of Elasticity - 3,140,000 psi, Max. Crush Strength - 13,010 psi. D. Grade: All lumber should be Premium -Clear All Heart, Lumber shall be graded both faces and both edges, Lumber shall be straight grained and parallel cut without heart center, Lumber shall be in sound condition, free from worm holes or knots. Alternate "A ", Base Bid, Barefoot Beach Preserve Park Lump Sum $198,000,40 Dollars Base Bid, Barefoot Beach Access Lump Sum $19,940.70 Dollars Base Bid, South Marco Beach Access Lump Sum $15,471.85 Dollars Grand Lump Sum $189-413-00 Dollars Note: Collier County Parks and Recreation Department reserves the right to directly purchase any or all material for this project. GC -P -2A (Revised 1- 25 -02) 16D 6 Unit Prices for Additional Work if Required: 1. Top railing, labor to remove existing railing and labor and material to install new matching railing. Price per linear foot (IPE) $ 6, 75 Price per linear foot (Tri -Max) $ 7.28 2. Remove existing Boardwalk planks, provide and install new 2 "x6" "IPE" planks. Price per sq. foot $ 11.24 3. Remove existing boardwalk planks, provide and install new "Tri -Max" planks. Price per sq. foot $ 11.70 4. Remove existing failed post(s) and replace with matching post as directed by the Project Manager. Price per Post $ N/A 5. Replace severely rusted bolts, nuts and washers with stainless steel bolts, nuts and washers of equal size as directed by the Project Manager. Price per set (Bolt, nut & washers) $ > > _ nn *Alternate "B" Scope of Work For South Marco Beach Access 1. Contractor shall remove existing decking, handrails, etc. and replace according to the primary specifications only the amount of decking that can be successfully replaced during the hours of 2:OOP.M. To 7:OOP.M. All work areas must be left in a completed state and accessible for public use during the non -work hours. 2. Estimate days to complete the this project using the above referenced work Schedule. 5 DAYS. 3. Additional cost to "Base Bid" or alternate "A" if required for using the above referenced work schedules. $ No additional. onal. GC -P -2B (Revised 1- 25 -02) 1 �;D 6' MATERIAL MANUFACTURERS The Bidder is required to state below, material manufacturers it proposes to utilize on this project. No change will be allowed after submittal of Bid. If substitute material proposed and listed below is not approved by Engineer, Bidder shall furnish the manufacturer named in the specification. Acceptance of this Bid does not constitute acceptance of material proposed on this list. THIS LIST MUST BE COMPLETED OR BID WILL BE DEEMED NON - RESPONSIVE. MATERIAL MANUFACTURER 1. _Tri -Max U.S. Plastic Lumber 2. IPE Austin Wholesale 3. PrpssurP Treated 4. —S. S. Screws 5 S.S. Bolts 6. Aqueous Wax Log End Sealer Dated 2/7/02 ta Sunbelt Forest Products Tru -Fast Corporation Star Stainless Anchorseal QUALITY ENTERPR &ES USA, INC. ° .-10dder Hdward J. Presiden� GC -P -3 xrelf, Jr. 16D 6 1 LIST OF SUBCONTRACTORS The'undersigned states that the following is a full and complete list of the proposed subcontractors on this Project and the class of work to be performed by each, and that such list will not be added to nor altered without written consent of the Project Manager. The undersigned further acknowledges its responsibility for ensuring that the subcontractors listed herein are "qualified" (as defined in Ordinance 87 -25 and Section 15 of Instructions to Bidders) and meet all legal requirements applicable to and necessitated by this Agreement, including, but not limited to proper licenses, certifications, registrations and insurance coverage. The County reserves the right to disqualify any bidder who includes non - compliant or non - qualified subcontractors in his /her bid offer. Further, the County may direct the bidder /contractor to remove /replace any subcontractor that is found to be non- compliant with this requirement subsequent to award of the contract at no additional cost to the County. THIS LIST MUST BE COMPLETED OR BID WILL BE DEEMED NON - RESPONSIVE. (Attach additional sheets as needed). Subcontractor and Address 1. None 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Dated 2/7/02 QUALITY ENTERP, ES USA, INC. � der BY: Howard J. urrel , Jr. President GC -P-4 16D 61 STATEMENT OF EXPERIENCE OF BIDDER The Bidder is required to state below what work of similar magnitude is a judge of its experience, skill and business standing and of its ability to conduct the work as completely and as rapidly as required under the terms of the contract. Project and Location Reference �• South Quadrant Roadway Naples Airport, Florida 2. Fast Quadrant T- Hangars Naples Airport, Florida 3. Sam's Club #6364 - Fueling Station Naples, Florida 5 0 VA Dated 2/7/02 Craig Davie 941 -643 -0733 Craig Davis 941 - 643 -0733 Rick Hayes 501- 204 -0302 ITY ENTERPRISES „USA, INC. BY: L'�,gvs y' ,/,�'`�', H ward J4 Mu rell, Jr. Preside,it GC -P -5 16D 6 ! TRENCH SAFETY ACT Bidder acknowledges that included in the various items of the proposal and in the Total Bid Price are costs for complying with the Florida Trench Safety Act (90 -96, Laws of Florida) effective October 1, 1990. The Bidder further identifies the cost to be summarized below: Trench Safety Units of Unit Unit Extended Measure Measure Quanti Cost Cost (Description) L( F,SY) 1 N/A 2. 3. 4. 5. TOTAL $ N/A Failure to complete the above may result in the Bid being declared non - responsive. DATE 217/x2 GC -P-6 16D 6 Upon receipt of written notice of the conditional acceptance of this Bid, Bidder will execute the formal Contract attached within ten (10) calendar days and deliver the Surety Bond or Bonds and Insurance as required by the Contract Documents. The bid security attached in the sum of: 5% dollars ($ ) is to become the property of the Owner in the event the Contract, Insurance and Bonds are not executed within the time above set forth for the delay and additional expense to the Owner. If awarded a contract under this Proposal, the undersigned proposes to commence work at the site within 5 calendar days from the commencement date stipulated in the written Notice to Proceed unless the Project Manager, in writing, subsequently notifies the Contractor of a modified (later) commencement date. The undersigned further agrees to substantially complete all work covered by this Proposal within ninety (90) consecutive calendar days, computed by excluding the commencement date and including the last day of such period, and to be fully completed to the point of final acceptance by the Owner within ninety -five (95) consecutive calendar days, computed by excluding commencement date and including the last day of such period. Respectfully Submitted: State of Florida County of Collier Hnwnrd .T MiirrPl 1 , being first duly sworn on oath deposes and says that the Bidder on the above Proposal is organized as indicated and that all statements herein made are made on behalf of such Bidder and that this deponent is authorized to make them. Howard J. Murrell. Jr. also deposes and says that it has examined and carefully prepared its Bid Proposal from the Contract Drawings and Specifications and has checked the same in detail before submitting this Bid; that the statements contained herein are true and correct. (a) Corporation The Bidder is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of _ Virginia a , which operates under the legal name of QUALITY ENTERPRISE9 USA INC., and the full names of its officers areas follows: President Howard .T- Miirrpl l - Tr Secretary Stacey L. Murrell Treasurer Manager GC -P -7 and it does or (does not) have a corporate seal. The So.Fve�...... 4..1 ceter -s takes i i (strike out this last sentence if not applicable). (b) Co- Partnership The Bidder is a co- partnership consisting of individual partners whose full names are as follows: The co- partnership does business under the legal name of: (c) Individual The Bidder is an individual whose full name is operating under a trade name, said trade name is DATED Witness/ Attest Witness legal entity BY: Howard J. Murrell, Jr. Name of Bidder (Tybd) 1 �f l Signature' , 11 President Title GC -P -8 16D 6 1 and if [Corporate Seal;. 16D 6 STATE OF T\ cold COUNTY OF COWer The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this �O day of - f �, 2000, by Howard J. Murrell., Jr. , as Praci aunt of QUALTTY F.NTFRPRT4FC TTRA, TNf a jrirginia corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He /she is personally known to me or has produced as identification and did (did not) take an oath. My Commission Expires: t�fck\ t�R, a cc (AFFIX OFFICIAL SEAL) BARM 11 COMMONOW'* W VCPMB: March 16. 20(W '4WWVzRy FL hatery serr= a smo 1n� -P ignature of Notary) NAME: sotfaA, (Legibly Printed) GC -P -9 Notary Public, State of — \Ccx&o- Commission No.: '1;6 C) --Ikx Sent By: OE; 941 435 7202; Feb -4 -02 4 :06PM; Page 617 16D 6 BID BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we - QUALITY ENTERPRISES USA, INC. (herein after called .the Principal) and (herein called the Surety), a corporation chartered and existing under the laws of the State of CONNECTICUT with its principal offices in the city of HARTECE211 and authorized to do business in the State of FLORIDA are held and firmly bound unto the COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSI R (hereinafter called the Owner, in the full and just sure of FIVE PERCENT OF BID AMT dollars ($ } good and lawful money of the United States of America, to be paid upon demand of the Owner, to which payment well and truly to be made, the Principal and the Surety bind themselves, their heirs, and executors, administrators, and assigns, jointly and severally and firmly by these presents. Whereas, the Principal is about to submit, or has submitted to the Owner, a proposal for furnishing all labor. materials, equipment and incidentals necessary to furnish and install: Barefoot Beach Preserve Park Barefoot Beach Access South Marco Beach Access Boardwalk Deck Replacement Bid # 02 -3323 NOW, THEREFORE: The conditions of this obligation are such that if the Proposal be accepted, the Principal shall, within fifteen days after the date of a written Notice of Award, execute a Contract in accordance with the Proposal and upon the terms, conditions and price(s) set forth therein, of the form and manner required by the Owner, and, 4xecie- a sufficient and satisfactory Contract Performance Bond and Payment Bond payable to the Owner, in an amount of 100 Percent of the total Contract price each in form and with security satisfactory to the said Owner, then this obligation to be void: otherwise to be and remain in full force and virtue in the lawn; and the Surety shall, upon failure of the Principal to comply with any or all of the foregoing requirements within the time specified above, immediately pay to the aforesaid Owner, upon demand, the amount hereof in good and lawful money of the United States of America, not as a penalty but as liquidated damages- GC-P-10 1115/2002 8:46 AM 50111 Oy. . �4i '+JJ IcVG} rCU-4 -V4 �+:uirlvli rage // j 160 6-4 IN TESTIMONY Thereof, the Principal and Surety have caused these presents to be duly signed and sealed this day of PIPS] , 2002_ ,y QUALITY ENTERPRISES USA, INC.Principal BY (Seal) Ty 3iiRFTY COMPANY OF AMERICA Surety KATHLEEN Countersigned - M , O VIA, A 0'�41q� ----� J. POWE Local Resident Produci g Age t for TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA AGENT: THOMAS RUTHERFOORD INC PO BOX 730 RICHMOND VA 23218 GC -P -11 1!15/2002 8:46 AM TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY 16D 6 FARMWGTON CASUALTY COMPANY Hartford, Connecticut 06183 -9062 POWER OF ATTORNEY AND CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY OF ATTORNEY(S) -IN-FACT KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF- AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY, corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of Connecticut, and having their principal offices in the City of Hartford, County of Hartford, State of Connecticut, (hereinafter the "Companies ") hath made, constituted and appointed, and do by these presents make, constitute and appoint: John C. Stanchina, Hunter F. Avery, Kathleen M. Taton, Barbara E. Moore, Claudia M. Clarkson, Kelly Lackey, Patricia L. Lewis, of Richmond, Virginia/Raleigh, North Carolina, their true and lawful Attomey(s) -in -Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred to sign, execute and acknowledge, at any place within the United States, the following instrument(s): by his/her sole signature and act, any and all bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and other writings obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking and any and all consents incident thereto and to bind the Companies, thereby as frilly and to the same extent as if the same were signed by the duly authorized officers of the Companies, and all the acts of said Attomey(s) -in -Fact, pursuant to the authority herein given, are hereby ratified and confirmed. This appointment is made under and by authority of the following Standing Resolutions of said Companies, which Resolutions are now in full force and effect: VOTED: That the Chairman, the President, any Vice Chairman, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President, any Vice President, any Second Vice President, the Treasurer, any Assistant Treasurer, the Corporate Secretary or any Assistant Secretary may appoint Attorneys -in -Fact and Agents to act for and on behalf of the company and may give such appointee such authority as his or her certificate of authority may prescribe to sign with the Company's name and seal with the Company's seal bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and other writings obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking, and any of said officers or the Board of Directors at any time may remove any such appointee and revoke the power given him or her. VOTED: That the Chairman, the President, any Vice Chairman, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President or any Vice President may delegate all or any part of the foregoing authority to one or more officers or employees of this Company, provided that each such delegation is in writing and a copy thereof is filed in the office of the Secretary. VOTED: That any bond, recognizance, contract of indemnity, or writing obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking shall be valid and binding upon the Company when (a) signed by the President, any Vice Chairman, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President or any Vice President, any Second Vice President, the Treasurer, any Assistant Treasurer, the Corporate Secretary or any Assistant Secretary and duly attested and sealed with the Company's seal by a Secretary or Assistant Secretary, or (b) duly executed (under seal, if required) by one or more Attomeys -in -Fact and Agents pursuant to the power prescribed in his or her certificate or their certificates of authority or by one or more Company officers pursuant to a written delegation of authority. This Power of Attorney and Certificate of Authority is signed and sealed by facsimile (mechanical or printed) under and by authority of the following Standing Resolution voted by the Boards of Directors of TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY, which Resolution is now in full force and effect: VOTED: That the signature of each of the following officers: President, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President, any Vice President, any Assistant Vice President, any Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any power of attorney or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Resident Vice Presidents, Resident Assistant Secretaries or Attorneys-in-Fact for purposes only of executing and attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and any such power of attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and certified by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached. 16D 6 THIS SHEET MUST BE SIGNED BY VENDOR BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Purchasing Department BIDDERS CHECK LIST IMPORTANT: Please read carefully, sign in the spaces indicated and return with your bid proposal Bidder should check off each of the following items as the necessary action is completed: 1. The Bid has been signed. 2. The bid prices offered have been reviewed. 3. The price extensions and totals have been checked. 4. The payment terms have been indicated. 5. Any required drawings, descriptive literature, etc. have been included. 6. Any delivery information required is included. 7. If required, the amount of bid bond has been checked, and the bid bond or cashiers check has been included. 8. Any addenda have been signed and included. 9. The mailing envelope has been addressed to: Purchasing Director Collier County Government Center Purchasing Building 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, Florida 34112 11. The mailing envelope must be sealed and marked with: <*Bid Number; Project Name; <*Opening Date. 12. The bid will be mailed or delivered in time to be received no later than the specified opening date and time. (Otherwise bid cannot be considered.) ALL COURIER - DELIVERED BIDS MUST HAVE THE BID NUMBED AND PROJECT NAME ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE COURIER PACKET Bides Name/ ��' S' atur " & Title Howard J. Murrell, Jr. President DATE: 2/7/02 GC -P -12 CONSTRUCTION AGREEMENT 16D 6 -4 THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ( "Owner") hereby contracts with Quality Enterprises USA Inc ( "Contractor ") of 5121 Castello Drive Suite 2 Naples, FI 34103 a Virginia corporation, to perform all work ( "Work ") in connection with Barefoot Beach, Barefoot Beach Access, South Marco Beach Access Handrail & Boardwalk Deck Replacement, Bid No. 02 -3323 ( "Project "), as said Work is set forth in the Plans and Specifications prepared by The Collier County Parks and Recreation Department Engineers, the Engineer and /or Architect of Record ( "Design Professional ") and other Contract Documents hereafter specified. Owner and Contractor, for the consideration herein set forth, agree as follows: Section 1. Contract Documents. A. The Contract Documents consist of this Agreement, the Exhibits described in Section 6 hereof, the Legal Advertisement, the Instructions to Bidders, the Bid Schedule and any duly executed and issued addenda, Change Orders, Work Directive Changes, Field Orders and amendments relating thereto. All of the foregoing Contract Documents are incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement (all of said documents including the Agreement sometimes being referred to herein as the "Contract Documents" and sometimes as the "Agreement "). A copy of the Contract Documents shall be maintained by Contractor at the Project site at all times during the performance of the Work. B. Owner shall furnish to the Contractor up to five (5) sets of the Contract Documents as are reasonably necessary for execution of the Work. Additional copies of the Contract Documents shall be furnished, upon request, at the cost of reproduction. Section 2. Scope of Work. Contractor agrees to furnish and pay for all management, supervision, financing, labor, materials, tools, fuel, supplies, utilities, equipment and services of every kind and type necessary to diligently, timely, and fully perform and complete in a good and workmanlike manner the Work required by the Contract Documents. Section 3. Contract Amount. In consideration of the faithful performance by Contractor of the covenants in this Agreement to the full satisfaction and acceptance of Owner, Owner agrees to pay, or cause to be paid, to Contractor the following amount (herein "Contract Amount "), in accordance with the terms of this Agreement: One Hundred Ninety Four Thousand Four Hundred Twenty Seven Dollars ($194,427.00) GC -CA -1 2125/2002 5:24 PM Section 4. Bonds. 160 6 A. Contractor shall provide Performance and Payment Bonds, in the form prescribed in Exhibit A, in the amount of 100% of the Contract Amount, the costs of which to be paid by Contractor. The Performance and Payment Bonds shall be underwritten by a surety authorized to do business in the State of Florida and otherwise acceptable to Owner; provided, however, the surety shall be rated as "A-" or better as to general policy holders rating and Class V or higher rating as to financial size category and the amount required shall not exceed 5% of the reported policy holders surplus, all as reported in the most current Best Key Rating Guide, published by A.M. Best Company, Inc. of 75 Fulton Street, New York, New York 10038. Should the contract amount be less than $500,000, the requirements of Section 287.0935, F.S. shall govern the rating and classification of the surety. B. If the surety for any bond furnished by Contractor is declared bankrupt, becomes insolvent, its right to do business is terminated in the State of Florida, or it ceases to meet the requirements imposed by the Contract Documents, the Contractor shall, within five (5) calendar days thereafter, substitute another bond and surety, both of which shall be subject to the Owner's approval. Section 5. Contract Time and Liquidated Damages. A. Time is of the essence in the performance of the Work under this Agreement. The "Commencement Date" shall be established in the Notice to Proceed to be issued by the Project Manager. Contractor shall commence the Work within five (5) calendar days from the Commencement Date. No Work shall be performed at the Project site prior to the Commencement Date. Any Work performed by Contractor prior to the Commencement Date shall be at the sole risk of Contractor. The Work shall be substantially completed within ninety (90) calendar days from the Commencement Date. The date of substantial completion of the Work (or designated portions thereof) is the date certified by the Design Professional when construction is sufficiently complete, in accordance with the Contract Documents, so Owner can occupy or utilize the Work (or designated portions thereof) for the use for which it is intended. The work shall reach final completion and be ready for final acceptance by Owner within ninety -five (95) calendar days from the Commencement Date (herein "Contract Time "). B. Owner and Contractor recognize that, since time is of the essence for this Agreement, Owner will suffer financial loss if the Work is not substantially completed within the time specified above, as said time may be adjusted as provided for herein. Should Contractor fail to substantially complete the Work within the time period noted above, Owner shall be entitled to assess, as liquidated damages, but not as a penalty, $125.00 for each calendar day thereafter until substantial completion is achieved. The Project shall be deemed to be substantially completed on the date the Project Manager (or at his /her direction, the Design Professional) issues a Certificate of Substantial Completion pursuant to the terms hereof. Contractor hereby expressly waives and relinquishes any right which it may have to seek to characterize the above noted liquidated damages as a penalty, which the parties agree represents a fair and reasonable estimate of the Owner's actual damages at the time of contracting if Contractor fails to substantially complete the Work in a timely manner. GC -CA -2 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 1�0 6 , C. When any period of time is referenced by days herein, it shall be computed to exclude the first day and include the last day of such period. If the last day of any such period falls on a Saturday or Sunday or-on a day made a legal holiday by the law of the applicable jurisdiction, such day shall be omitted from the computation, and the last day shall become the next succeeding day which is not a Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday. Section 6. Exhibits Incorporated The following documents are expressly agreed to be incorporated by reference and made a part of this Agreement. Exhibit A: Performance and Payment Bond Forms Exhibit B: Insurance Requirements Exhibit C: Release and Affidavit Form Exhibit D: Contractor Application for Payment Form Exhibit E: Change Order Form Exhibit F: Certificate of Substantial Completion Form Exhibit G: Final Payment Checklist Exhibit H: General Terms and Conditions Exhibit I: Supplemental Terms and Conditions Exhibit J: (reserved) Exhibit K: Permits Exhibit L: Standard Details (if applicable) Exhibit M: Plans and Specifications prepared by Parks & Recreation Section 7. Notices A. All notices required or made pursuant to this Agreement by the Contractor to the Owner shall be in writing and delivered by hand or by United States Postal Service Department, first class mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the following: Mr. Antonio Ruberto,CSI, Project Manager Department of Parks and Recreation 3300 Santa Barbara Boulevard Naples, Florida 34116 941/353-0404 B. All notices required or made pursuant to this Agreement by Owner to Contractor shall be made in writing and shall be delivered by hand or by United States Postal Service Department, first class mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, addressed to the following: Mr. Howard J. Murrell, Jr. Quality Enterprises USA, Inc. 5121 Castello Drive Suite 2 Naples, FI 34103 941 -435 -7200 GC -CA -3 2/25/2002 5:24 PM C. Either party may change its above noted address by giving written notice to the other party in accordance with the requirements of this Section. .1 �;D 6 Section 8. Modification. No modification or change to the Agreement shall be valid or binding upon the parties unless in writing and executed by the party or parties intended to be bound by it. Section 9. Successors and Assigns Subject to other provisions hereof, the Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors and assigns of the parties to the Agreement. Section 10. Governing Law. The Agreement shall be interpreted under and its performance governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Section 11. No Waiver. The failure of the Owner to enforce at any time or for any period of time any one or more of the provisions of the Agreement shall not be construed to be and shall not be a waiver of any such provision or provisions or of its right thereafter to enforce each and every such provision. Section 12. Entire Agreement Each of the parties hereto agrees and represents that the Agreement comprises the full and entire agreement between the parties affecting the Work contemplated, and no other agreement or understanding of any nature concerning the same has been entered into or will be recognized, and that all negotiations, acts, work performed, or payments made prior to the execution hereof shall be deemed merged in, integrated and superseded by the Agreement. Section 13. Severability. Should any provision of the Agreement be determined by a court to be unenforceable, such a determination shall not affect the validity or enforceability of any other section or part thereof. Section 14. Change Order Authorization The Project Manager shall have the authority on behalf of the Owner to execute all change orders to the Agreement to the extent provided for under the County's Purchasing Policy and accompanying administrative procedures. GC -CA -4 2/25/2002 5:18 PM Section 15. Construction. 160 6 Any doubtful or ambiguous language contained in this Agreement shall not be construed against the party who physically prepared this Agreement. The rule sometimes referred to as "fortius contra proferentum" (pursuant to which ambiguities in a contractual term which appears on its face to have been inserted for the benefit of one of the parties shall be construed against the benefited party) shall not be applied to the construction of this Agreement. Section 16. Order of Precedence In the event of any conflict between or among the terms of any of the Contract Documents, the terms of the Construction Agreement and the General Terms and Conditions shall take precedence over the terms of all other Contract Documents. To the extent any conflict in the terms of the Contract Documents cannot be resolved by application of the Construction Agreement and the General Terms and Conditions, the conflict shall be resolved by imposing the more strict obligation under the Contract Documents upon the Contractor. X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXXXXX XXXXXX XXXXX XXXX XXX XX X GC -CA -5 2/25/2002 9:08 AM below. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the date(s) indicated ATTEST: Corporate Secre ry/Wi ess 2 "d Witness Dater o�G, zooy ATTEST: Dwight E. Brock, Clerk Approved As To Form and is ncy: Robert Za ha Assistant County Attorney 2/25/2002 5:18 PM CONTRACTOR: 16D 6 Quality Enterprises USA, INC 5121 Castello Drive Suite 2 Naples, FI 34103 j ard J. Murr Jr. BY: ITS: President ,ykk/ Dates / [Corporate Seal; OWNER: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COU Y FLO D BY: James N Coletta, Chairman GC -CA -6 EXHIBIT A PUBLIC PAYMENT BOND Barefoot Beach Preserve Park Barefoot Beach Access South Marco Beach Access Boardwalk Deck Replacement 1F0 6-4 Bond No. Contract No. 02 -3323 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That OUAT,TTY ENT .RPRTS S USA TNC (r' TFLLO DRIVE, S UTTR 2. NAPLES FL 34 05 as Principal, and .lZ1 V J TRAVF.T.FRS_ C ASITAT.TY AND SURETY COMPANY- QF AMERICA:- , as Surety, located at 300 ARBORETUM: SUITE 390 RICHMOND VA 23236 (Business Address) are held and firmly bound to cQLLIER COUNTY BD of COMMISSIONERS— as Oblige in the sum of ONE HUNDRED NINETY FOUR THOUS FOUR HUND TWENTY SEVEN ,427.90–J for the payment whereof we bind ourselves, our heirs jointly and severally. , executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns, WHEREAS, Princi trc�s� 26th day of FEBRUARY 2042, with Oblige for n COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA_ accordance with drawings an spec nations, w is contrac is incorporated by reference and made a part hereof, and is referred to as the Contract. THE CONDITION OF THIS BOND is that if Principal: Promptly makes payment to all claimants as defined in Section 255.05(1), Florida Statutes, supplying Principal with labor, materials or supplies, used directly or indirectly by Principal in the prosecution of the work provided for in the Contract, then this bond is void; otherwise it remains in full force. Any changes in or under the Contract and compliance or noncompliance with any formalities connected with the Contract or the changes do not affect Sureties obligation under this Bond. The provisions of this bond are subject to the time limitations of Section 255.05(2). In no event will the Surety be liable in the aggregate to claimants for more than the penal sum of this Payment Bond, regardless of the number of suits that may be fled by claimants. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above parties have executed this instrument this 5th day of MARCH 2402, the name of each party being affixed and these presents duly signed by its under - signed representative, pursuant to authority of its governing body. GC- CA -A -1 2/2512002 9 :08 AM Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: 160 6 PRINCIPAL QUALITY ENTERPRISES USA, INC. BU: FLA 2/25/2002 9:08 AM WI GC- CA -A -2 BY' �. x'r ; , Witnes es a to Principal ,. NAME: Howard J. Mu rrell� Jr. STATE OF Florida ITS: Presi nt _ COUNTY OF Collier The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 3-W' day of March by Howard 2GO2, .T. Murrell Jr as President of Inc , a Virginia corporation, on behalf of the corporation. he is to me OR has produced _ not) take an oath. as identification and did (did MY Commission Expires: +� February 11, 2006 (Signature of Notary) NAME: Marcie L. Cohen ,;rrsy: MARCIELCOHEN (Legibly Printed) .: MY COMMISSION # DD 090876 EXPIRES: February 11, 2006 i rwrlem l Notary Public, State of Florida Commission No.: DD 090876 ATTEST: SURETY: TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF �� T ML+O TFT (Printed Name) 300 ARBORETUM SUITE 390 RICHMOND, VA 23236 (Busi ess Address (Authorized Signature) KATHLEEN M TATON ATTORNEY IN FACT Witnesses to Surety Name) BU: FLA 2/25/2002 9:08 AM WI GC- CA -A -2 Witnesses STATE OF VTRnTMTA COUNTY OF RT04MOND OR 16D 6.4 As Attorney in Fact (Attach Power of Attomey) (Printed Name) (Business Address) (Telephone Number) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ a day of 2002, by KATHLEEN M TATON — sanae�' as of TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY CO pn>�urety on behalf of Surety. /She is personally known to me OR has produced OF �mERICA as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. n My Commission Expires: (AFFIX OFFICIAL SEAL) 2125/2002 9:08 AM Name (Legibly Printed) Notary Public, State of: _ VIRGINIA Commission No.: N/A GC- CA -A -3 EXHIBIT A PUBLIC PERFORMANCE BOND 16D 6 Barefoot Beach Preserve Park Barefoot Beach Access South Marco Beach Access Boardwalk Deck Replacement Bond No. 103723331 Contract No. 02 -3323 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That QUALITY ENTERPRISES USA, INC. as Principal, and TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA as Surety, located at 300 ARBORETUM SUITE 390 RICHMOND VA 23236 (Business Address) are held and firmly bound to COLLIER COUNTY BD OF COMMISSIONERS , as Oblige in the sum of ONE HUNDRED NINETY FOUR THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY SEVEN AND NO /100 ($ 194,427,00 ) for the payment whereof we bond ourselves, our heirs, executors, personal representatives, successors and assigns, jointly and severally. WHEREAS; Principal has entered into a contract dated as of the 26th day of FEBRUARY 2002, with Oblige for BAREFOOT BCH PRESERVE PK;BAREFOOT BCH ACCESS ; SOUTH MARCO BCH ACCESS; In accordance with drawings and specifications, which contract is incorporated by reference and made a part hereof, and is referred to as the Contract. THE CONDITION OF THIS BOND is that if Principal: 1. Performs the Contract at the times and in the manner prescribed in the Contract; and 2. Pays Oblige any and all losses, damages, costs and attorneys' fees that Oblige sustains because of any default by Principal under the Contract, including, but not limited to, all delay damages, whether liquidated or actual, incurred by Oblige; and 3. Performs the guarantee of all work and materials fumished under the Contract for the time specified in the Contract, then this bond is void; otherwise it remains in full force. Any changes in or under the Contract and compliance or noncompliance with any formalities connected with the Contract or the changes do not affect Sureties obligation under this Bond_ The Surety, for value received, hereby stipulates and agrees that no changes, extensions of time, alterations or additions to the terms of the Contract or other work to be performed hereunder, or the specifications referred to therein shall in anywise affect its obligations under this bond, and it does hereby waive notice of any such changes, extensions of time, alterations or additions to the terms of the Contract or to work or to the specifications. GC- CA -A-4 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 1 This instrument shall be zonstrued in all respects as a common law bond. It is expressly understood that the time provisions and statute of limitations under Section 255.05, Florida Statutes, shall not apply to this bond. In no event will the Surety be liable in the aggregate to Oblige for more than the penal sum of this Performance Bond regardless of the number of suits that may be filed by Oblige, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the above parties have executed this instrument this 5th day of MARCH , 2002, the name of each party being affixed and these presents duly signed by its undersigned representative, pursuant to authority of its governing body. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: PRINCIPAL QUALITY ENTERPRISES US:, INC. r Wftrkss as to Principal NAME: .T_ 1"M>>rr,11 -Jr ITS' Praci runt STATE OF _ Flior.tdn,._ COUNTY OF _collier The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 54- day of March , 2002, by -mnward .T_ Mn P11 , as President of USA. Inc. , a Virginia corporation, on behalf of the corporation. he is personally known to me OR has produced as identification and did (did not) take an oath. My Commission Expires: February 11, 2006�lk / (Signature) (AFFIX OFFICIAL SEAL) MARCIE L COHEN MY COMMISSION # DD 090876 EXPIRES: February 11, 2006 ry,RE i f Bonded Thru Notary Public UrdenvOtere 2/25/2002 9.08 AM Name: Marcie L. Cohen (Legibly Printed) Notary Public, State of: Florid, Commission No.: T)T) (19(1876 GC-CA-A-5 ATTEST. Witnesses STATE OF VIRGINIA COUNTY OF -- RZCHM= 16D 6 SURETY: TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA ( Printed Name) 'Ann ARRnRFTTIM S]tI'TGTF �q(1 �N1r --V-A _ 2 ,d2.Ji�__...__._. ............. ....................._.__...�__ (Busi ess Address) (Authorized Signature) al► u �il ►l • ►la► IN—FACT (PrinLtqdN m SR BY: FLA a *ILLIAN20PRELPS As Attomey in Fact (Attach Power of Attomey) (Printed Name) (Business Address) (Telephone Number) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 5th day of MARCH 2002, by KATHLEEN M TATON as ATTORNEY IN FACT of OR F' °!��.of Surety, i}WShe is personally known to me s produ as identification and who did (did not) take an oath. My Commission Expires: i nature) ' , (-JESSICA J . _ SICA P. JOHNSON (Legibly Printed) (AFFIX OFFICIAL SEAL) Notary Public, Stale of: _ VIRGINIA Commission No.: A GC- CA -A-6 2125/2002 9 :08 AM TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AI (ERICA TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY 160 FARNIINGTON CASUALTY CONIPANY Hartford, Connecticut 06183 -9062 POWER OF ATTORNEY AND CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY OF ATTOR- NEY(S) -1N-FACT 6, KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY, corporations duly organized under the laws of the State of Connecticut_ and having their principal offices in the City of Hartford, County of Hartford, State of Connecticut, (hereinafter the "Companies ") hath made, constituted and appointed, and do by these presents make, constitute and appoint: John C. Stanchina, Hunter F. Avery, Kathleen M. Taton, Barbara E. Moore, Claudia M. Clarkson, Kelly Lackey, Patricia L. Lewis, of Richmond, Virginia/Raleigh, North Carolina, their true and lawful Attorneys) -in -Fact, with full power and authority hereby conferred to sign, execute and acknowledge, at any place within the United States, the following instrurnent(s): by his/her sole signature and act, any and ail bonds, recognizances, contracts of indemnity, and other writings obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking and any and all consents incident thereto and to bind the Companies, thereby as fully and to the same extent as if the same were signed by the duly authorized officers of the Companies, and all the acts of said Attorney(s) -in -Fact, pursuant to the authority herein given, are hereby ratified and confirmed. This appointment is made under and by authority of the following Standing Resolutions of said Companies, which Resolutions are now in full force and effect: VOTED: That the Chairman, the President, any Vice Chairman, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President, any Vice President, any Second Vice President, the Treasurer, any Assistant Treasurer, the Corporate Secretary or any Assistant Secretary may appoint Attorneys -in -Fact and Agents to act for and on behalf of the company and may give such appointee such authority as his or her certificate of authority may prescribe to sign with the Company's name and seal with the Company's seal bonds, recomizances, contracts of indemnity, and other writings obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking, and any of said officers or the Board of Directors at any time may remove any such appointee and revoke the power given him or her. VOTED: That the Chairman, the President, any Vice Chairman, anv Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President or any Vice President may delegate all or any part of the foregoing authority to one or more officers or emplovees of this Company, provided that each such delegation is in writing and a copy thereof is filed in the office of the Secretary. VOTED: That any bond, recognizance, contract of indemnity, or writing obligatory in the nature of a bond, recognizance, or conditional undertaking shall be valid and binding upon the Company when (a) signed by the President, any Vice Chairman, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President or any Vice President, any Second Vice President, the Treasurer, any Assistant Treasurer, the Corporate Secretary or any Assistant Secretary and duly attested and sealed with the Company's seal by a Secretary or Assistant Secretary, or (b) duly executed (under seal, if required) by one or more Attomeys -in -Fact and Agents pursuant to the power prescribed in his or her certificate or their certificates of authority or by one or more Company officers pursuant to a written delegation of authority. This Power of Attorney and Certificate of Authority is signed and sealed by facsimile (mechanical or printed) under and by authority of the following Standing Resolution voted' the Boards of Directors of TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AMERICA, TRAVELERS by AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY, which Resolution is now in full force and effect: VOTED: That the signature of each of the following officers: President, any Executive Vice President, any Senior Vice President, any Vice President, any Assistant Vice President, anv Secretary, any Assistant Secretary, and the seal of the Companv may be affixed by facsimile to anv Power of attorney or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Resident Vice Presidents, Resident Assistant Secretaries or Attomevs -in -Fact for Purposes only of executing and attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof, and anv such power of attornev or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be valid and 'binding upon the Company and anv such power so executed and certified by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is attached. 1 1-40 Standard) 1.110111. /1tS7 UALIENTEI ACORD,. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 03/04/02 PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Thomas Rutherfoord, Inc. ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE 400 N Center Dr, Bldg 3, Suite 100 HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR Norfolk VA 23509 ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. 757 4 5 5- 5 511 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURED : St . Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Quality Enterprises LISA Inc INSURERA _ & Quality Environment Co Inc INSURER B: _ — 5121 Castello Drive, Suite #2 INSURER C: Naples, FL 34104 -3506 INSURER D: INSURER E: rnVFRA[_FC THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR � PVE LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER Y A 'GENERAL POLICY EXPIRATION DATE MM /DD/YY LIMITS LIABILITY KKO 4 600019 07/01/02 EACH OCCURRENCE $1 , 000, 0 0 0 X COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY X CLAIMS MADE X OCCUR FIRE DAMAGE (Any one fire) is 5 0 0 0 0 - -- - - .. — - _ _ MED EXP (Any one person) $5_0 0 0 H PERSONAL & ADV INJURY�1 , 0 0 0, 000 GENERAL AGGREGATE l $2,0 0 0, 0 0 0 GEN'LAGGREGATE LIMITAPPLIES PER: I POLICY C PRODUCTS - COMP /OP AGG $2 0 0 0 0 0 0 JE LOC A AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY KA0 4 6 0 0 0 0 3 07/01/01 0 7/ 0 1/ 0 2 A X ANY AUTO KA04600004 07/01/01 07/01/02 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Eaaccident) $1,000, 000 Ex ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per person) $ X NON -OWNED AUTOS BODILY INJURY (Per accident) $ A,XiHired Auto PhysKA04600003 07/01/01 07/01/02 - Comp/$500 /$500 Col PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) $ Dama e -$50, 000 !$250 GARAGE LIABILITY AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ ANY AUTO I OTHER THAN EA ACC $ $ A AUTO ONLY: AGG EXCESS LIABILITY KK0 4 6 0 0 019 07/01/01 0 7/ 0 1/ 0 2 I EACH OCCURRENCE $ 5, 000, 0 0 0 In OCCUR F7 CLAIMS MADE i AGGREGATE 15O 0 0, 0 0 0 $ $ DEDUCTIBLE — RETENTION $ A WORKERS COMPENSATION AND I WVK4 6 0 0 0 1 8 !07/01/01 0 7/ 0 1/ 0 2 X W C TA 'U- OTR• EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY — E.L. EACH ACCIDENT_ $1 0 0, 000 E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEEI $1 0 0 , 000 - - --[— - — - A 1 OTHER Leased/ CK04600192 07/01/01 07/01/02 E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $5 0 0 , 000 $100,000 Any One Item Rented Equip $200,000 any One Disaster DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSNEHICLES /EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS RE: Contract #02 -3323 - "Barefoot Beach Preserve Park, Barefoot Beach Access, South Marco Beach Access Boardwalk Deck & Handrail Replacement" The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida are named as Additional Insured -ATIMA under the General Liability as respects to work performed by the insured for the referenced job and /or contract. 11"Mrtcrrrnrc M^1— I I ___ —_ - - -- The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Purchasing Builiding Naples, FL 34112 Amon SHOULD ANYOFTH E ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE TH E EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 3 n_ DAYS WRITTEN NOTICETOTHE CERTIFICATE HOLDERNAMED TOTHE LEFT, BUTFAILURE TODOSOSHALL IM POSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURE R,ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVE • l �� 1 tto -L U `t / >'± / iVIO 1 1 .7 b KH o ACORD CORPORATION 1988 EXHIBIT B INSURANCE REQUIREMENTS 16D 6 (1) The amounts and types of insurance coverage shall conform to the following minimum requirements with the use of Insurance Services Office (ISO) forms and endorsements or their equivalents. (2) The insurance required by this Agreement shall be written for not less than the limits specified herein or required by law, whichever is greater. (3) Coverage's shall be maintained without interruption from the date of commencement of the work until the date of completion and acceptance of the Project by the Owner or as specified in this Agreement, whichever is longer. (4) Certificates of insurance (3 copies) acceptable to the Owner shall be filed with the Owner within ten (10) calendar days after Notice of Award is received by Contractor /Consultant/Professional. (5) The Contractor and /or its insurance carrier shall provide 30 days written notice to the Owner of policy cancellation or non - renewal on the part of the insurance carrier or the Contractor. (6) All insurance coverage's of the Contractor /Consultant/Professional shall be primary to any insurance or self insurance program carried by the Owner applicable to this Project. (7) The acceptance by Owner of any Certificate of Insurance does not constitute approval or agreement by the Owner that the insurance requirements have been satisfied or that the insurance policy shown on the Certificate of Insurance is in compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. (8) Contractor /Consultant/Professionai shall require each of its subcontractors to procure and maintain, until the completion of the subcontractors work, insurance of the types and to the limits specified in this Section unless such insurance requirements for the subcontractor are expressly waived in writing by the Owner. (9) Should at any time the Contractor /Consultant/Professional not maintain the insurance coverage's required herein, the Owner may terminate the Agreement or at its sole discretion shall be authorized to purchase such coverage's and charge the Contractor for such coverage's purchased. The Owner shall be under no obligation to purchase such insurance, nor shall it be responsible for the coverage's purchased or the insurance company or companies used. The decision of the Owner to purchase such insurance coverage's shall in no way be construed to be a waiver of any of its rights under the Contract Documents. GC- CA -B -1 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 160 6 1 10 If the initial or an subsequently ( ) y issued Certificate of Insurance expires prior to the completion of the Work or termination of the Agreement, the Contractor /Consultant/Professional shall furnish to the County, renewal or replacement Certificate(s) of Insurance not later than ten (10) calendar days after to the date of their expiration. Failure of the Contractor to provide the County with such renewal certificate(s) shall be considered justification for the County to terminate the Agreement. WORKERS' COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY Required by this Agreement? X Yes No (1) Workers' Compensation and Employers' Liability Insurance shall be maintained by the Contractor /Consultant/ Professional during the term of this Agreement for all employees engaged in the work under this Agreement in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. The amounts of such insurance shall not be less than: a. Worker's Compensation - Florida Statutory Requirements b. Employers' Liability $100,000 Each Accident $500,000 Disease Aggregate $100,000 Disease Each Employee X $1,000,000 Each Accident $1,000,000 Disease Aggregate $1,000,000 Disease Each Employee (2) The insurance company shall waive its Rights of Subrogation against the Owner and the policy shall be so endorsed. (3) United States Longshoreman's and Harborworker's Act coverage shall be maintained where applicable to the completion of the work X Applicable ❑ Not Applicable (4) Maritime Coverage (Jones Act) shall be maintained where applicable to the completion of the work. X Applicable ❑ Not Applicable GC- CA -B -2 2/25/2002 9:08 AM COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY 160 6 1 Required by this Agreement? X Yes No (1) Commercial General Liability Insurance shall be maintained by the Contractor / Consultant / Professional. Coverage will include, but not be limited to, Bodily Injury, Property Damage, Personal Injury, Contractual Liability for this Agreement, Independent Contractors, Broad Form Property Damage including Completed Operations and Products and Completed Operations Coverage. Limits of Liability shall not be less than the following: General Aggregate $ 300,000 Products /Completed Operations Aggregate $ 300,000 Personal and Advertising Injury $ 300,000 Each Occurrence $ 300,000 Fire Damage $ 50,000 General Aggregate $ 500,000 Products /Completed Operations Aggregate $ 500,000 Personal and Advertising Injury $ 500,000 Each Occurrence $ 500,000 Fire Damage $ 50,000 X General Aggregate $1,000,000 Products /Completed Operations Aggregate $1,000,000 Personal and Advertising Injury $1,000,000 Each Occurrence $1,000,000 Fire Damage $ 50,000 (2) The General Aggregate Limit shall apply separately to this Project and the policy shall be endorsed using the following endorsement wording. "This endorsement modifies insurance provided under the following: Commercial General Liability Coverage Part. The General Aggregate Limit under LIMITS OF INSURANCE applies separately to each of your projects away from premises owned by or rented to you." (3) If the General Liability insurance required herein is issued or renewed on a "claims made" basis, as opposed to the "occurrence" form, the retroactive date for coverage shall be no later than the commencement date of the Project and shall provide that in the event of cancellation or non - renewal the Extended Reporting Period (Discovery Period) for claims shall be no less than three (3) years. (4) The Owner shall be named as an Additional Insured and the policy shall be endorsed that such coverage shall be primary to any similar coverage carried by the Owner. GC- CA -B -3 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 160 6 (5) Coverage shall be included for explosion, collapse or underground property damage claims. (6) Watercraft Liability coverage shall be carried at the limits shown above if applicable to the completion of the work under this Agreement. X Applicable ❑ Not Applicable (7) Aircraft Liability coverage shall be carried at limits of $1,000,000 each occurrence if applicable to the completion of the work under this Agreement. ❑ Applicable X Not Applicable PROPERTY INSURANCE - BUILDERS RISK (1) The Owner shall purchase and maintain in a company or companies lawfully authorized to do business in the State of Florida and in Collier County, property insurance in the amount of the initial Contract Sum as well as subsequent modifications thereto for the entire Work at the site on a replacement cost basis without voluntary deductibles. Such property insurance shall be maintained, unless otherwise provided in the Contract Documents or otherwise agreed in writing by all persons and entities who are beneficiaries of such insurance, until final payment has been made or until no person or entity other than the Owner has an insurable interest in the property required to be covered, whichever is earlier. This insurance shall include interests of the Owner, the Contractor, Subcontractors, Sub - subcontractors and Material Suppliers in the Work. (2) Property insurance shall be on an all -risk policy form and, at the Owner's option, shall cover reasonable compensation for Professional's services and expenses required as a result of such insured loss. At the Owner's option, flood insurance will also be purchased. (3) The property insurance provided by the Owner requires minimum deductibles and the Contractor shall pay costs not covered by the deductibles. The responsibility of the Contractor for any deductible associated with the all -risk policy described above shall be limited to a maximum of $1,000 for each occurrence unless higher deductibles are identified in Exhibit C of the Contract Documents. The responsibility of the Contractor for any deductible associated with the flood insurance identified herein, if purchased by the Owner, shall be limited to a maximum of $1,000 for each occurrence unless higher deductibles are identified in Exhibit C of the Contract Documents. (4) This property insurance shall cover portions of the Work stored off the site after written approval of the Owner at the value established in the approval, and also portions of the Work in transit. (5) Boiler and Machinery Insurance. The Owner shall have the option of purchasing and maintaining boiler and machinery insurance required by the Contract Documents or by law, which shall specifically cover such insured objects during installation and until final acceptance by the Owner. If purchased this insurance shall include interests of the Owner, Contractor, Subcontractors and Sub- contractors in the Work. GC- CA -B-4 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 160 6 1 (6) Waivers of Subrogation. The Owner and Contractor waive all rights against (1) each other and any of their subcontractors, sub - subcontractors, agents and employees, each of the other, and (2) the Professional, Professional's consultants, for damages caused by fire or other perils to the extent covered by property insurance obtained pursuant to this exhibit or other property insurance applicable to the Work, except such rights as they have to proceeds of such insurance held by the Owner as fiduciary. The policies shall provide waivers of subrogation by endorsement or otherwise. (7) A loss insured under Owner's property insurance shall be adjusted by the Owner as fiduciary and made payable to the Owner as fiduciary for the insured, as their interests may appear. AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY INSURANCE Required by this Agreement? X Yes No (1) Automobile Liability Insurance shall be maintained by the Contractor /Consultant/Professional for the ownership, maintenance or use of any owned, non -owned or hired vehicle with limits of not less than: Bodily Injury & Property Damage - $ 500,000 X Bodily Injury & Property Damage - $1,000,000 UMBRELLA LIABILITY (1) Umbrella Liability may be maintained as part of the liability insurance of the Contractor /Consultant/ Professional and, if so, such may shall be in addition to and in excess of any Employers' Liability, Commercial General Liability, Automobile Liability and Professional Liability coverage's and shall include all coverage's on a "following form" basis. (2) The policy shall contain wording to the effect that, in the event of the exhaustion of any underlying coverage due to the payment of claims, the Umbrella policy will "drop down" to apply as primary insurance. (3) The General Aggregate limit, if applicable, shall apply separately to this project and the policy shall be so endorsed. GC- CA -B -5 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6-1 EXHIBIT C RELEASE AND AFFIDAVIT FORM COUNTY OF COLLIER ) STATE OF FLORIDA ) Before me, the undersigned authority, personally appeared _ who after being duly sworn, deposes and says: (1) In accordance with the Contract Documents and in consideration of $ paid, ( "Contractor ") releases and waives for itself and it's subcontractors, material -men, successors and assigns, all claims demands, damages, costs and expenses, whether in contract or in tort, against the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, relating in any way to the performance of the Agreement between Contractor and Owner, dated 2002 for the period from to (2) Contractor certifies for itself and its subcontractors, material -men, successors and assigns, that all charges for labor, materials, supplies, lands, licenses and other expenses for which Owner might be sued or for which a lien or a demand against any payment bond might be filed, have been fully satisfied and paid. (3) Contractor agrees to indemnify, defend and save harmless Owner from all demands or suits, actions, claims of liens or other charges filed or asserted against the Owner arising out of the performance by Contractor of the Work covered by this Release and Affidavit. (4) This Release and Affidavit is given in connection with Contractor's [monthly /final] Application for Payment No. BY: ITS: DATE: Witnesses STATE OF _ COUNTY OF CONTRACTOR President [Corporate Seal] The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , as of corporation, on behalf of the corporation. He /she is personally known to me or has produced as identification and did (did not) take an oath. My Commission Expires: NAME: (AFFIX OFFICIAL SEAL) (Signature of Notary) (Legibly Printed) Notary Public, State of Commissioner No.: GC- CA -C -1 2/2512002 9:08 AM 2002, by ,a 16D 6 EXHIBIT D FORM OF CONTRACT APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT (County Project Manager) (County Department) Collier County Board of County Commissioners (the OWNER) or Collier County Water -Sewer District (the OWNER) FROM: (Contractor's Representative) (Contractor's Name) (Contractor's Address) RE: Original Contract Time: Revised Contract Time: Percent Work completed to Date: Percent Contract Time completed to Date Bid No. _ Project No. Application Date Payment Application No. for Work accomplished through the Date: Original Contract Amount: $ Total Change Orders to Date $ Revised Contract Amount $ Total value of Work Completed and stored to Date $ Less Retainage $ Total earned Less Retainage $ Less previous payment (s) $ AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION: $ I Project Name) ATTACH SCHEDULE OF VALUES AND ACCOMPANYING DOCUMENTATION TO THIS APPLICATION CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION: The undersigned CONTRACTOR certifies that: (1) all previous progress payments received from OWNER on account of Work done under the Contract referred to above have been applied to discharge in Full all obligations of CONTRACTOR incurred in connection with Work covered by prior Applications for Payment numbered 1 through inclusive; (2) title to all materials and equipment incorporated in said Work or otherwise listed in or covered by this Application for Payment will pass to OWNER at time of payment free and clear of all liens, claims, security interests and encumbrances (except such as covered by Bond acceptable to OWNER); (3) all amounts have been paid for work which previous payments were issued and received from the OWNER and that current payment is now due; (4) and CONTRACTOR agrees that all overruns as shown on the monthly estimate summary shall, in fact, be added to the revised contract and shall be incorporated into a future Change Order: By CONTRACTOR: (Contractor's Name) (Signature) DATE:_ (Type Name & Title) (shall be signed by a duly authorized representative of CONTRACTOR) Payment to the CONTRACTOR for the above AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION is recommended: By Design Professional : _ (DP's Name) (Signature) DATE: _ _ (Type Name & Title) Payment to the CONTRACTOR for the above AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION is approved: By OWNER'S Project Manager: (Signature) DATE: (Type Name and Title) GC- CA -D -1 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 0 A � o z F. U b y y O E co z U .O A. 16D 6:1, W Q Z Q w W UU ZZ J U- QO m � N W z F-- W Ua wg w° aU ❑O wF- Q W W W 0�Op O cn U� � J W Q Ow U) Q T O ❑ w a W w cn a O U U) 0J a o ° IL LU¢ � a ❑ w J w (y ❑ JQ U Z O H a U J w Q O F- �w w 00 H � z N Q U 0 pN O N_ N N CHANGE ORDER NO. TO: DATE: PROJECT NAME: PROJECT NO.: Under our AGREEMENT dated EXHIBIT E CHANGE ORDER CONTRACT NO. _ 2002. 16D 6 J You hereby are authorized and directed to make the following change(s) in accordance with terms and conditions of the Agreement: FOR THE (Additive) (Deductive) Sum of: Original Agreement Amount $ Sum of Previous Changes $ This Change Order (Add) (Deduct) $ Present Agreement Amount $ The time for completion shall be (increased /decreased) by calendar days due to this Change Order. Accordingly, the Contract Time is now () calendar days. The substantial completion date is and the final completion date is . Your acceptance of this Change Order shall constitute a modification to our Agreement and will be performed subject to all the same terms and conditions as contained in our Agreement indicated above, as fully as if the same were repeated in this acceptance. The adjustment, if any, to the Agreement shall constitute a full and final settlement of any and all claims of the Contractor arising out of or related to the change set forth herein, including claims for impact and delay costs. Accepted: CONTRACTOR: By: 2125/2002 9:08 AM , 2002 OWNER: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: DESIGN PROFESSIONAL By: GC- CA -E -1 OWNER'S Project No. PROJECT: CONTRACTOR Contract For _ Contract Date EXHIBIT F CERTIFICATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION ENGINEER'S Project No. 16D 6 This Certificate of Substantial completion applies to all Work under the Contract documents or to the following specified parts thereof: To OWNER And To The Work to which this Certificate applies has been inspected by authorized representatives of OWNER, CONTRACTOR AND DESIGN PROFESSIONAL, and that Work is hereby declared to be substantially complete in accordance with the contract documents on: DATE OF SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION A tentative list of items to be completed or corrected is attached hereto. This list may not be all- inclusive, and the failure to include an item in it does not alter the responsibility of CONTRACTOR to complete all the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. The items in the tentative list shall be completed or corrected by CONTRACTOR within days of the above date of Substantial Completion. EJCDC NO. 1910 -8 -D (1993 Edition) Prepared by the Engineers Joint Contract documents Committee and endorsed by The Associated General Contractors of America. Reprinted 5/85 GC- CA -F -1 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D .6- The responsibilities between OWNER and CONTRACTOR for security, operation, safety, maintenance, heat, utilities, insurance and warranties shall be as follows: RESPONSIBILITIES: OWNER: CONTRACTOR: The following documents are attached to and made a part of this Certificate: This certificate does not constitute an acceptance of Work not in accordance with the Contract Documents nor is it a release of CONTRACTOR'S obligation to complete the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Executed by Design Professional on 2002 By: Design Professional Type Name and Title CONTRACTOR accepts this Certificate of Substantial Completion on CONTRACTOR By: Type Name and Title OWNER accepts this Certificate of Substantial Completion on A 2/25/2002 9:08 AM OWNER Type Name and Title GC- CA -F -2 2002 2002 Bid No.: Contractor: EXHIBIT G FINAL PAYMENT CHECKLIST Project No.: The following items have been secured by the for the Project known as Date: 16D 6 2002 and have been reviewed and found to comply with the requirements of the Contract Documents. Original Contract Amount: Commencement Date: Substantial Completion Time: Final Completion Time: YES NO Final Contract Amount: Calendar Days. Calendar Days. 1. All Punch List items completed on 2. Warranties and Guarantees assigned to County (attach to this form). 3. Effective date of General one year warranty from Contractor is: 4. 2 copies of Operation and Maintenance manuals for equipment and system submitted (list manuals in attachment to this form). 5. Record drawings obtained and dated: 6. County personnel trained on system and equipment operation. 7. Certificate of Occupancy No.: issued on (attach to this form). 8. Certificate of Substantial Completion issued on 9. Final Payment Application and Affidavits received from Contractor on: 10. Consent of Surety received on 11. Operating Department personnel notified project is in operating phase. 12. Other: If any of the above are not applicable, indicate by N /A. If NO is checked for any of the above, attach explanation. Acknowledgments: By Contractor: By Owner: CG- CA -G -1 2125/2002 9:08 AM (Company Name) (Signature) (Typed Name & Title) (Department Name) (Signature) (Name & Title) EXHIBIT H , 16D b GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. INTENT OF CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. 1.1. It is the intent of the Contract Documents to describe a functionally complete project (or portion thereof) to be constructed in accordance with the Contract Documents. Any work, materials or equipment that may reasonably be inferred from the Contract Documents as being required to produce the intended result shall be supplied whether or not specifically called for. When words, which have a well -known technical or trade meaning, are used to describe work, materials or equipment, such words shall be interpreted in accordance with that meaning. Reference to standard specifications, manuals or codes of any technical society, organization or association or to the laws or regulations of any governmental authority having jurisdiction over the Project, whether such reference be specific or by implication, shall mean the latest standard specification, manual, code, law or regulation in effect at the time the Work is performed, except as may be otherwise specifically stated herein. 1.2. If before or during the performance of the Work Contractor discovers a conflict, error or discrepancy in the Contract Documents, Contractor immediately shall report same to the Project Manager in writing and before proceeding with the Work affected thereby shall obtain a written interpretation or clarification from the Project Manager. Contractor shall take field measurements and verify field conditions and shall carefully compare such field measurements and conditions and other information known to Contractor with the Contract Documents before commencing any portion of the Work. 1.3. Drawings are intended to show general arrangements, design and extent of Work and are not intended to serve as shop drawings. Specifications are separated into divisions for convenience of reference only and shall not be interpreted as establishing divisions for the Work, trades, subcontracts, or extent of any part of the Work. In the event of a discrepancy between or among the drawings, specifications or other Contract Document provisions, Contractor shall be required to comply with the provision, which is the more restrictive or stringent requirement upon the Contractor, as determined by the Project Manager. Unless otherwise specifically mentioned, all anchors, bolts, screws, fittings, fillers, hardware, accessories, trim and other parts required in connection with any portion of the Work to make a complete, serviceable, finished and first quality installation shall be furnished and installed as part of the Work, whether or not called for by the Contract Documents. 2. INVESTIGATION AND UTILITIES. 2.1. Contractor shall have the sole responsibility of satisfying itself concerning the nature and location of the Work and the general and local conditions, and particularly, but without limitation, with respect to the following: those affecting transportation, access, disposal, handling and storage of materials; availability and quality of labor; water and electric power; availability and condition of roads; work area; living facilities; GC- CA -H -1 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 climatic conditions and seasons; physical conditions at the work -site and the project area as a whole; topography and ground surface conditions; nature and quantity of the surface materials to be encountered; subsurface conditions; equipment and facilities needed preliminary to and during performance of the Work; and all other costs associated with such performance. The failure of Contractor to acquaint itself with any applicable conditions shall' not relieve Contractor' from any of its responsibilities to perform under the Contract Documents, nor shall it be considered the basis for any claim for additional time or compensation. 2.2. Contractor shall locate all existing roadways, railways, drainage facilities and utility services above, upon, or under the Project site, said roadways, railways, drainage facilities and utilities being referred to in this Sub - Section 2.2 as the "Utilities ". Contractor shall contact the owners of all Utilities to determine the necessity for relocating or temporarily interrupting any Utilities during the construction of the Project. Contractor shall schedule and coordinate its Work around any such relocation or temporary service interruption. Contractor shall be responsible for properly shoring, supporting and protecting all Utilities at all times during the course of the Work. The Contractor is responsible for coordinating all other utility work so as to not interfere with the prosecution of the Work (except those utilities to be coordinated by the Owner as described in other places of the contract documents). 3. SCHEDULE. 3.1. The Contractor, within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of the Notice of Award, shall prepare and submit to Project Manager, for their review and approval, a progress schedule for the Project (herein "Progress Schedule "). The Progress Schedule shall relate to all Work required by the Contract Documents, and shall utilize the Critical Path method of scheduling and shall provide for expeditious and practicable execution of the Work within the Contract Time. The Progress Schedule shall indicate the dates for starting and completing the various stages of the Work. 3.2. The Progress Schedule shall be updated monthly by the Contractor. All monthly updates to the Progress Schedule shall be subject to the Project Manager's review and approval. Contractor shall submit the updates to the Progress Schedule with its monthly Applications for Payment noted below. The Project Manager's review and approval of the submitted Progress Schedule updates shall be a condition precedent to the Owner's obligation to pay Contractor. 3.3 All work under this Agreement shall be performed within the requirements of the Collier County Noise Ordinance 93 -77, Amended by 96 -29 and Article 1, Division 1.5, Section 1.5.5 of the Collier County Land Development Code. Subject to approval by the Board of County Commissioners, work can be performed 24 hours per day, seven days per week. No work shall be performed outside the specified hours without the prior approval of the Project Manager. GC- CA -H -2 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 7 4. - PROGRESS PAYMENTS. 4.1. Prior to submitting its first monthly Application for Payment, Contractor shall submit to Project Manager, for their review and approval, a schedule of values based upon the Contract Price, listing the major elements of the Work and the dollar value for each element. After its approval by the Project Manager, this schedule of values shall be used as the basis for the Contractor's monthly Applications for Payment. This schedule shall be updated and submitted each month to the Project Manager along with a completed copy of the Application for Payment form signed by the Contractor's authorized representative and attached to the Agreement as Exhibit D. 4.2. Prior to submitting its first monthly Application for Payment, Contractor shall submit to the Project Manager a complete list of all its proposed subcontractors and material -men, showing the work and materials involved and the dollar amount of each proposed subcontract and purchase order. The first Application for Payment shall be submitted no earlier than thirty (30) days after the Commencement Date. 4.3. If payment is requested on the basis of materials and equipment not incorporated into the Project, but delivered and suitably stored at the site or at another location agreed to by the Owner in writing, the Application for Payment shall also be accompanied by a bill of sale, invoice or other documentation warranting that the Owner has received the materials and equipment free and clear of all liens, charges, security interests and encumbrances, together with evidence that the materials and equipment are covered by appropriate property insurance and other arrangements to protect Owner's interest therein, all of which shall be subject to the Owner's satisfaction. 4.4. Contractor shall submit six (6) copies of its monthly Application for Payment to the Project Manager. Within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of each Application for Payment, the Project Manager shall either: (1) indicate its approval of the requested payment; (2) indicate its approval of only a portion of the requested payment, stating in writing its reasons therefor; or (3) return the Application for Payment to the Contractor indicating, in writing, the reason for refusing to approve payment. Payments of proper invoices shall be processed in accordance with Section 218.70, F.S. and the administrative procedures established by the County's Purchasing and Finance Departments respectively. In the event of a total denial and return of the Application for Payment by the Project Manager, the Contractor may make the necessary corrections and re- submit the Application for Payment. The Owner shall, within thirty (30) calendar days after Project Manager approval of an Application for Payment, pay the Contractor the amounts so approved. 4.5. Owner shall retain ten percent (10 %) of the gross amount of each monthly payment request or ten percent (10 %) of the portion thereof approved by the Project Manager for payment, whichever is less. Such sum shall be accumulated and not released to Contractor until final payment is due unless otherwise agreed to by the Owner. The Project Manager shall have the discretion to establish, in writing, a schedule to periodically reduce the percentage of cumulative retainage held through out the course of the project schedule. GC- CA -H -3 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 1 4.6. Monthly payments to Contractor shall in no way imply approval or acceptance of Contractor's work. 4.7. Each Application for Payment, subsequent to the first pay application, shall be accompanied by a Release and Affidavit, in the form attached as Exhibit C, showing that all materials, labor, equipment and other bills associated with that portion of the Work payment is being requested on have been paid in full. For all payments subsequent to the first payment, the Owner shall not be required to make payment until and unless these affidavits are furnished by Contractor. 4.8. Contractor agrees and understands that funding limitations exist and that the expenditure of funds must be spread over the duration of the Project at regular intervals based on the Contract Amount and Progress Schedule. Accordingly, prior to submitting its first monthly Application for Payment, Contractor shall prepare and submit for Project Manager's review and approval, a detailed Project Funding Schedule, which shall be updated as necessary and approved by Owner to reflect approved adjustments to the Contract Amount and Contract Time. No voluntary acceleration or early completion of the Work shall modify the time of payments to Contractor as set forth in the approved Project Funding Schedule. 4.9. Prior to release of final payment and final retainage, the Contractor's Representative and the Project Manager shall jointly complete the Final Payment Checklist, a representative copy of which is enclosed in the agreement and labeled Exhibit G. 5. PAYMENTS WITHHELD. 5.1. The Project Manager may decline to approve any Application for Payment, or portions thereof, because of subsequently discovered evidence or subsequent inspections that reveal non - compliance with the contract documents. The Project Manager may nullify the whole or any part of any approval for payment previously issued and Owner may withhold any payments otherwise due Contractor under this Agreement or any other agreement between Owner and Contractor, to such extent as may be necessary in the Owner's opinion to protect it from loss because of: (a) Defective Work not remedied; (b) third party claims filed or reasonable evidence indicating probable filing of such claims; (c) failure of Contractor to make payment properly to subcontractors or for labor, materials or equipment; (d) reasonable doubt that the Work can be completed for the unpaid balance of the Contract Amount; (e) reasonable indication that the Work will not be completed within the Contract Time; (f) unsatisfactory prosecution of the Work by the Contractor; or (g) any other material breach of the Contract Documents. 5.2. If any conditions described in 5.1. are not remedied or removed, Owner may, after three (3) days written notice, rectify the same at Contractor's expense. Owner also may offset against any sums due Contractor the amount of any liquidated or non - liquidated obligations of Contractor to Owner, whether relating to or arising out of this Agreement or any other agreement between Contractor and Owner. GC- CA -H -4 2125/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 7 6. FINAL PAYMENT. 6.1. Owner shall make final payment to Contractor within thirty (30) calendar days after the Work is finally inspected and accepted by Project Manager in accordance with Section 20.1 herein, provided that Contractor first, and as an explicit condition precedent to the accrual of Contractor's right to final payment, shall have furnished Owner with a properly executed and notarized copy of the Release and Affidavit attached as Exhibit C, as well as, a duly executed copy of the Sureties consent to final payment and such other documentation that may be required by the Contract Documents and the Owner. 6.2. Contractor's acceptance of final payment shall constitute a full waiver of any and all claims by Contractor against Owner arising out of this Agreement or otherwise relating to the Project, except those previously made in writing and identified by Contractor as unsettled at the time of the final Application for Payment. Neither the acceptance of the Work nor payment by Owner shall be deemed to be a waiver of Owner's right to enforce any obligations of Contractor hereunder or to the recovery of damages for defective Work not discovered by the Design Professional or Project Manager at the time of final inspection. 7. SUBMITTALS AND SUBSTITUTIONS. 7.1. Contractor shall carefully examine the Contract Documents for all requirements for approval of materials to be submitted such as shop drawings, data, test results, schedules and samples. Contractor shall submit all such materials at its own expense and in such form as required by the Contract Documents in sufficient time to prevent any delay in the delivery of such materials and the installation thereof. 7.2. Whenever materials or equipment are specified or described in the Contract Documents by using the name of a proprietary item or the name of a particular supplier, the naming of the item is intended to establish the type, function and quality required. Unless the name is followed by words indicating that no substitution is permitted, materials or equipment of other suppliers may be accepted by Owner if sufficient information is submitted by Contractor to allow the Owner to determine that the material or equipment proposed is equivalent or equal to that named. Requests for review of substitute items of material and equipment will not be accepted by Owner from anyone other than Contractor and all such requests must be submitted by Contractor to Project Manager within thirty (30) calendar days after Notice of Award is received by Contractor. GC- CA -H -5 2125/2002 9:08 AM T 16 6 1 7.3. If Contractor wishes to furnish or use a substitute item of material or equipment, Contractor shall make application to the Project Manager for acceptance thereof, certifying that the proposed substitute shall adequately perform the functions and achieve the results called for by the general design, be similar and of equal substance• to that specified and be suited to the same use as that specified. The application shall state that the evaluation and acceptance of the proposed substitute will not prejudice Contractor's achievement of substantial completion on time, whether or not acceptance of the substitute for use in the Work will require a change in any of the Contract Documents (or in the provisions of any other direct contract with Owner for the Project) to adapt the design to the proposed substitute and whether or not incorporation or use by the substitute in connection with the Work is subject to payment of any license fee or royalty. All variations of the proposed substitute from that specified will be identified in the application and available maintenance, repair and replacement service shall be indicated. The application also shall contain an itemized estimate of all costs that will result directly or indirectly from acceptance of such substitute, including costs for redesign and claims of other contractors affected by the resulting change, all of which shall be considered by the Project Manager in evaluating the proposed substitute. The Project Manager may require Contractor to furnish at Contractor's expense additional data about the proposed substitute. 7.4. If a specific means, method, technique, sequence or procedure of construction is indicated in or required by the Contract Documents, Contractor may furnish or utilize a substitute means, method, sequence, technique or procedure of construction acceptable to the Project Manager, if Contractor submits sufficient information to allow the Project Manager to determine that the substitute proposed is equivalent to that indicated or required by the Contract Documents. The procedures for submission to and review by the Project Manager shall be the same as those provided herein for substitute materials and equipment. 7.5. The Project Manager shall be allowed a reasonable time within which to evaluate each proposed substitute and, if need be, to consult with the Design Professional. No substitute will be ordered, installed or utilized without the Project Manager's prior written acceptance which shall be evidenced by either a Change Order, a Work Directive Change, a Field Order or an approved Shop Drawing. The Owner may require Contractor to furnish at Contractor's expense a special performance guarantee or other surety with respect to any substitute. The Project Manager will record time required by the Project Manager and the Project Manager's consultants in evaluating substitutions proposed by Contractor and making changes in the Contract Documents occasioned thereby. Whether or not the Owner accepts a proposed substitute, Contractor shall reimburse Owner for the charges of the Design Professional and the Design Professional's consultants for evaluating each proposed substitute. 8. DAILY REPORTS, AS- BUILTS AND MEETINGS. 8.1. Unless waived in writing by Owner, Contractor shall complete and submit to Project Manager on a weekly basis a daily log of the Contractor's work for the preceding week in a format approved by the Project Manager. The daily log shall document all activities of Contractor at the Project site including, but not limited to, the following: GC- CA -H -6 2/25/2002 9:08 AM '16D 6 8.1.1. Weather conditions showing the high and low temperatures during work hours, the amount of precipitation received on the Project site, and any other weather conditions which adversely affect the Work; 8.1.2. Soil conditions which adversely affect the Work; 8.1.3. The hours of operation by Contractor's and Sub - Contractor's personnel; 8.1.4. The number of Contractor's and Sub - Contractor's personnel present and working at the Project site, by subcontract and trade; 8.1.5. All equipment present at the Project site, description of equipment use and designation of time equipment was used (specifically indicating any down time); 8.1.6. Description of Work being performed at the Project site; 8.1.7. Any unusual or special occurrences at the Project site; 8.1.8. Materials received at the Project site; 8.1.9. A list of all visitors to the Project 8.1.10. Any problems that might impact either the cost or quality of the Work or the time of performance. The daily log shall not constitute nor take the place of any notice required to be given by Contractor to Owner pursuant to the Contract Documents. 8.2. Contractor shall maintain in a safe place at the Project site one record copy of the Contract Documents, including, but not limited to, all drawings, specifications, addenda, amendments, Change Orders, Work Directive Changes and Field Orders, as well as all written interpretations and clarifications issued by the Design Professional, in good order and annotated to show all changes made during construction. The annotated drawings shall be continuously updated by the Contractor throughout the prosecution of the Work to accurately reflect all field changes that are made to adapt the Work to field conditions, changes resulting from Change Orders, Work Directive Changes and Field Orders, and all concealed and buried installations of piping, conduit and utility services. All buried and concealed items, both inside and outside the Project site, shall be accurately located on the annotated drawings as to depth and in relationship to not less than two (2) permanent features (e.g. interior or exterior wall faces). The annotated drawings shall be clean and all changes, corrections and dimensions shall be given in a neat and legible manner in a contrasting color. The "As- Built" record documents, together with all approved samples and a counterpart of all approved shop drawings GC- CA -H -7 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 shall be available to the Project Manager or Design Professional for reference. Upon completion of the Work and as a condition precedent to Contractor's entitlement to final payment, these "As- Built" record documents, samples and shop drawings shall be delivered to Project Manager by Contractor for Owner. 8.3. Contractor shall keep all records and supporting documentation which concern or relate to the Work hereunder for a minimum of five (5) years from the date of termination of this Agreement or the date the Project is completed, whichever is later. Owner, or any duly authorized agents or representatives of Owner, shall have the right to audit, inspect and copy all such records and documentation as often as they deem necessary during the period of this Agreement and during the five (5) year period noted above; provided, however, such activity shall be conducted only during normal business hours. 9. CONTRACT TIME AND TIME EXTENSIONS. 9.1. Contractor shall diligently pursue the completion of the Work and coordinate the Work being done on the Project by its subcontractors and material -men, as well as coordinating its Work with all work of others at the Project Site, so that its Work or the work of others shall not be delayed or impaired by any act or omission by Contractor. Contractor shall be solely responsible for all construction means, methods, techniques, sequences, and procedures, as well as coordination of all portions of the Work under the Contract Documents, and the coordination of Owner's suppliers and contractors as set forth in Paragraph 12.2. herein. 9.2. Should Contractor be obstructed or delayed in the prosecution of or completion of the Work as a result of unforeseeable causes beyond the control of Contractor, and not due to its fault or neglect, including but not restricted to acts of God or of the public enemy, acts of government, fires, floods, epidemics, quarantine regulation, strikes or lockouts, Contractor shall notify the Owner in writing within forty -eight (48) hours after the commencement of such delay, stating the cause or causes thereof, or be deemed to have waived any right which Contractor may have had to request a time extension. 9.3. No interruption, interference, inefficiency, suspension or delay in the commencement or progress of the Work from any cause whatever, including those for which Owner may be responsible, in whole or in part, shall relieve Contractor of its duty to perform or give rise to any right to damages or additional compensation from Owner. Contractor expressly acknowledges and agrees that it shall receive no damages for delay. Contractor's sole remedy, if any, against Owner will be the right to seek an extension to the Contract Time; provided, however, the granting of any such time extension shall not be a condition precedent to the aforementioned "No Damage For Delay" provision. This paragraph shall expressly apply to claims for early completion, as well as to claims based on late completion. GC- CA -H -8 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 10. - CHANGES IN THE WORK. 10.1. Owner shall have the right at any time during the progress of the Work to increase or decrease the Work. Promptly after being notified of a change, Contractor shall submit an itemized estimate of any cost or time increases or savings it foresees as a result of the change. Except in an emergency endangering life or property, or as expressly set forth herein, no addition or changes to the Work shall be made except upon written order of Owner, and Owner shall not be liable to the Contractor for any increased compensation without such written order. No officer, employee or agent of Owner is authorized to direct any extra or changed work orally. 10.2. A Change Order, in the form attached as Exhibit E to this Agreement, shall be issued and executed promptly after an agreement is reached between Contractor and Owner concerning the requested changes. Contractor shall promptly perform changes authorized by duly executed Change Orders. The Contract Amount and Contract Time shall be adjusted in the Change Order in the manner as Owner and Contractor shall mutually agree. 10.3. If Owner and Contractor are unable to agree on a Change Order for the requested change, Contractor shall, nevertheless, promptly perform the change as directed by Owner in a written Work Directive Change. In that event, the Contract Amount and Contract Time shall be adjusted as directed by Owner. If Contractor disagrees with the Owner's adjustment determination, Contractor must make a claim pursuant to Section 11 of these General Conditions or else be deemed to have waived any claim on this matter it might otherwise have had. 10.4. In the event a requested change results in an increase to the Contract Amount, the amount of the increase shall be limited to the Contractor's reasonable direct labor and material costs and reasonable actual equipment costs as a result of the change (including allowance for labor burden costs) plus a maximum ten percent (10 %) markup for all overhead and profit. In the event such change Work is performed by a Subcontractor, a maximum ten percent (10 %) markup for all overhead and profit for all Subcontractors' and sub - subcontractors' direct labor and material costs and actual equipment costs shall be permitted, with a maximum five percent (5 %) markup thereon by the Contractor for all of its overhead and profit, for a total maximum markup of fifteen percent (15 %). All compensation due Contractor and any Subcontractor or sub- subcontractor for field and home office overhead is included in the markups noted above. Contractor's and Sub - Contractor's bond costs associated with any change order shall be included in the overhead and profit expenses and shall not be paid as a separate line item. 10.5 Owner shall have the right to conduct an audit of Contractor's books and records to verify the accuracy of the Contractor's claim with respect to Contractor's costs associated with any Change Order. GC- CA -H -9 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 10.6 The Project Manager shall have authority to order minor changes in the Work not involving an adjustment to the Contract Amount or an extension to the Contract Time and not inconsistent with the intent of the Contract Documents. Such changes may be effected by Field Order or by other written order. Such changes shall be binding on the Contractor. 11. CLAIMS AND DISPUTES. 11.1 Claim is a demand or assertion by one of the parties seeking an adjustment or interpretation of the terms of the Contract Documents, payment of money, extension of time or other relief with respect to the terms of the Contract Documents. The term "Claim" also includes other disputes and matters in question between Owner and Contractor arising out of or relating to the Contract Documents. The responsibility to substantiate a Claim shall rest with the party making the Claim. 11.2. Claims by the Contractor shall be made in writing to the Project Manager within forty -eight (48) hours after the first day of the event giving rise to such Claim or else the Contractor shall be deemed to have waived the Claim. Written supporting data shall be submitted to the Project Manager within fifteen (15) calendar days after the occurrence of the event, unless the Owner grants additional time in writing, or else the Contractor shall be deemed to have waived the Claim. All claims shall be priced in accordance with the provisions of Subsection 10.4. 11.3. The Contractor shall proceed diligently with its performance as directed by the Owner, regardless of any pending Claim, action, suit or administrative proceeding, unless otherwise agreed to by the Owner in writing. Owner shall continue to make payments in accordance with the Contract Documents during the pendency of any Claim. 12. OTHER WORK. 12.1. Owner may perform other work related to the Project at the site by Owner's own forces, have other work performed by utility owners or let other direct contracts. If the fact that such other work is to be performed is not noted in the Contract Documents, written notice thereof will be given to Contractor prior to starting any such other work. If Contractor believes that such performance will involve additional expense to Contractor or require additional time, Contractor shall send written notice of that fact to Owner and Design Professional within forty -eight (48) hours of being notified of the other work. If the Contractor fails to send the above required forty -eight (48) hour notice, the Contractor will be deemed to have waived any rights it otherwise may have had to seek an extension to the Contract Time or adjustment to the Contract Amount. 12.2. Contractor shall afford each utility owner and other contractor who is a party to such a direct contract (or Owner, if Owner is performing the additional work with Owner's employees) proper and safe access to the site and a reasonable opportunity GC- CA -H -10 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 'i6D 6' for the introduction and storage of materials and equipment and the execution of such work and shall properly connect and coordinate its Work with theirs. Contractor shall do all cutting, fitting and patching of the Work that may be required to make its several parts come together properly and integrate with such other work. Contractor shall not endanger any work of others by cutting, excavating or otherwise altering their work and will only cut or alter their work with the written consent of the Project Manager and the others whose work will be affected. The duties and responsibilities of Contractor under this paragraph are for the benefit of such utility owners and other Contractors to the extent that there are comparable provisions for the benefit of Contractor in said direct contracts between Owner and such utility owners and other contractors. 12.3. If any part of Contractor's Work depends for proper execution or results upon the work of any other contractor or utility owner (or Owner), Contractor shall inspect and promptly report to Project Manager in writing any delays, defects or deficiencies in such work that render it unavailable or unsuitable for such proper execution and results. Contractor's failure to report will constitute an acceptance of the other work as fit and proper for integration with Contractor's Work. 13. INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE. 13.1 INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor/Vendor, in consideration of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is accepted through the signing of this document, shall hold harmless and defend Collier County and its agents and employees from all suits and actions, including attorneys' fees and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of this contract or work performed thereunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against the County by any employee of the named Contractor/Vendor, any Subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The Contractor / Vendor's obligation under this provision shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Contract or the Contractor/Vendor's limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. The first One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) of money received on the contract price is considered as payment of this obligation by the County. 13.2 This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of Collier County. 13.3. Contractor shall obtain and carry, at all times during its performance under the Contract Documents, insurance of the types and in the amounts set forth in Exhibit B to the Agreement. Further, the Contractor shall at all times comply with all of the terms, conditions, requirements and obligations set forth under Exhibit B. GC- CA -H -11 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D b 14. _ COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS. 14.1. Contractor agrees to comply, at its own expense, with all federal, state and local laws, codes, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations and requirements applicable to the Project, including but not limited to those dealing with taxation, worker's compensation, equal employment and safety (including, but not limited to, the Trench Safety Act, Chapter 553, Florida Statutes). If Contractor observes that the Contract Documents are at variance therewith, it shall promptly notify Project Manager in writing. 15. CLEANUP AND PROTECTIONS. 15.1. Contractor agrees to keep the Project site clean at all times of debris, rubbish and waste materials arising out of the Work. At the completion of the Work, Contractor shall remove all debris, rubbish and waste materials from and about the Project site, as well as all tools, appliances, construction equipment and machinery and surplus materials, and shall leave the Project site clean and ready for occupancy by Owner. 15.2. Any existing surface or subsurface improvements, including, but not limited to, pavements, curbs, sidewalks, pipes, utilities, footings, structures, trees and shrubbery, not indicated in the Contract Documents to be removed or altered, shall be protected by Contractor from damage during the prosecution of the Work. Any such improvements so damaged shall be restored by Contractor to the condition equal to that existing at the time of Contractor's commencement of the Work. 16. ASSIGNMENT. 16.1. Contractor shall not assign this Agreement or any part thereof, without the prior consent in writing of Owner. Any attempt to assign or otherwise transfer this Agreement, or any part herein, without the County's consent, shall be void. If Contractor does, with approval, assign this Agreement or any part thereof, it shall require that its assignee be bound to it and to assume toward Contractor all of the obligations and responsibilities that Contractor has assumed toward Owner. 17. PERMITS, LICENSES AND TAXES. 17.1. Pursuant to Section 218.80, F.S., Owner will pay for all Collier County permits and fees, including license fees, permit fees, impact fees or inspection fees applicable to the work through an internal budget transfer(s). Contractor is not responsible for paying for permits issued by Collier County, but is responsible for acquiring all permits. Owner may require the Contractor to deliver internal budget transfer documents to applicable Collier County agencies when the Contractor is acquiring permits. 17.2. All permits, fees and licenses necessary for the prosecution of the Work which are not issued by Collier County shall be acquired and paid for by the Contractor. GC- CA -H -12 2125/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 . 17.3. Contractor shall pay all sales, consumer, use and other similar taxes associated with the Work or portions thereof, which are applicable during the performance of the Work. 18. TERMINATION FOR DEFAULT. 18.1. Contractor shall be considered in material default of the Agreement and such default shall be considered cause for Owner to terminate the Agreement, in whole or in part, as further set forth in this Section, if Contractor: (1) fails to begin the Work under the Contract Documents within the time specified herein; or (2) fails to properly and timely perform the Work as directed by the Project Manager or as provided for in the approved Progress Schedule; or (3) performs the Work unsuitably or neglects or refuses to remove materials or to correct or replace such Work as may be rejected as unacceptable or unsuitable; or (4) discontinues the prosecution of the Work; or (5) fails to resume Work which has been suspended within a reasonable time after being notified -to do so; or (6) becomes insolvent or is declared bankrupt, or commits any act of bankruptcy; or (7) allows any final judgment to stand against it unsatisfied for more than ten (10) days; or (8) makes an assignment for the benefit of creditors; or (9) fails to obey any applicable codes, laws, ordinances, rules or regulations with respect to the Work; or (10) materially breaches any other provision of the Contract Documents. 18.2. Owner shall notify Contractor in writing of Contractor's default(s). If Owner determines that Contractor has not remedied and cured the default(s) within seven (7) calendar days following receipt by Contractor of said written notice, then Owner, at its option, without releasing or waiving its rights and remedies against the Contractor's sureties and without prejudice to any other right or remedy it may be entitled to hereunder or by law, may terminate Contractor's right to proceed under the Agreement, in whole or in part, and take possession of all or any portion of the Work and any materials, tools, equipment, and appliances of Contractor, take assignments of any of Contractor's subcontracts and purchase orders, and complete all or any portion of Contractor's Work by whatever means, method or agency which Owner, in its sole discretion, may choose. 18.3. If Owner deems any of the foregoing remedies necessary, Contractor agrees that it shall not be entitled to receive any further payments hereunder until after the Project is completed. All moneys expended and all of the costs, losses, damages and extra expenses, including all management, administrative and other overhead and other direct and indirect expenses (including Design Professional and attorneys' fees) or damages incurred by Owner incident to such completion, shall be deducted from the Contract Amount, and if such expenditures exceed the unpaid balance of the Contract Amount, Contractor agrees to pay promptly to Owner on GC- CA -H -13 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 1 demand the full amount of such excess, including costs of collection, attorneys' fees (including appeals) and interest thereon at the maximum legal rate of interest until paid. If the unpaid balance of the Contract Amount exceeds all such costs, expenditures and damages incurred by the Owner to complete the Work, such excess shall be paid to the Contractor. The amount to be paid to the Contractor or Owner, as the case may be, shall be approved by the Project Manager, upon application, and this obligation for payment shall survive termination of the Agreement. 18.4. The liability of Contractor hereunder shall extend to and include the full amount of any and all sums paid, expenses and losses incurred, damages sustained, and obligations assumed by Owner in good faith under the belief that such payments or assumptions were necessary or required, in completing the Work and providing labor, materials, equipment, supplies, and other items therefor or re- letting the Work, and in settlement, discharge or compromise of any claims, demands, suits, and judgments pertaining to or arising out of the Work hereunder. 18.5. If, after notice of termination of Contractor's right to proceed pursuant to this Section, it is determined for any reason that Contractor was not in default, or that its default was excusable, or that Owner is not entitled to the remedies against Contractor provided herein, then Contractor's remedies against Owner shall be the same as and limited to those afforded Contractor under Section 19 below. 19. TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE AND RIGHT OF SUSPENSION 19.1. Owner shall have the right to terminate this Agreement without cause upon seven (7) calendar days written notice to Contractor. In the event of such termination for convenience, Contractor's recovery against Owner shall be limited to that portion of the Contract Amount earned through the date of termination, together with any retainage withheld and reasonable termination expenses incurred, but Contractor shall not be entitled to any other or further recovery against Owner, including, but not limited to, damages or any anticipated profit on portions of the Work not performed. 19.2. Owner shall have the right to suspend all or any portions of the Work upon giving Contractor not less than two (2) calendar days' prior written notice of such suspension. If all or any portion of the Work is so suspended, Contractor's sole and exclusive remedy shall be to seek an extension of time to its schedule in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Contract Documents. In no event shall the Contractor be entitled to any additional compensation or damages. Provided, however, if the ordered suspension exceeds six (6) months, the Contractor shall have the right to terminate the Agreement with respect to that portion of the Work which is subject to the ordered suspension. 20. COMPLETION. 20.1. When the entire Work (or any portion thereof designated in writing by Owner) is ready for its intended use, Contractor shall notify Project Manager in writing that the GC- CA -H -14 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 � entire Work (or such designated portion) is substantially complete and request that Project Manager issue a Certificate of Completion (substantial or final Certificate of Completion). Within a reasonable time thereafter, Owner, Contractor and Design Professional shall make an inspection of the Work (or designated portion thereof) to determine the status of completion. If Design Professional and Project Manager do not consider the Work .(or designated portion) substantially complete, Project Manager shall notify Contractor in writing giving the reasons therefor. If Design Professional and Project Manager consider the Work (or designated portion) substantially complete, Project Manager shall prepare and deliver to Contractor a Certificate of Completion (substantial or final Certificate of Completion) which shall fix the date of Substantial Completion for the entire Work (or designated portion thereof) and include a tentative punch -list of items to be completed or corrected by Contractor before final payment. Owner shall have the right to exclude Contractor from the Work and Project site (or designated portion thereof) after the date of Substantial Completion, but Owner shall allow Contractor reasonable access to complete or correct items on the tentative punch -list. 20.2. Upon receipt of written certification by Contractor that the Work is completed in accordance with the Contract Documents and is ready for final inspection and acceptance and upon receipt of a final Application for Payment, Project Manager and Design Professional will make such inspection and, if they find the Work acceptable and fully performed under the Contract Documents shall promptly issue a final Certificate for Payment, recommending that, on the basis of their observations and inspections, and the Contractor's certification that the Work has been completed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the Contract Documents, that the entire balance found to be due Contractor is due and payable. Neither the final payment nor the retainage shall become due and payable until Contractor submits: (1) The Release and Affidavit in the form attached as Exhibit C. (2) Consent of surety to final payment (3) If required by Owner, other data establishing payment or satisfaction of all obligations, such as receipts, releases and waivers of liens, arising out of the Contract Documents, to the extent and in such form as may be designated by Owner. Owner reserves the right to inspect the Work and make an independent determination as to the Work's acceptability, even though the Design Professional may have issued its recommendations. Unless and until the Owner is completely satisfied, neither the final payment nor the retainage shall become due and payable. 29. WARRANTY. 21.1. Contractor shall obtain and assign to Owner all express warranties given to Contractor or any subcontractors by any material -men supplying materials, equipment or fixtures to be incorporated into the Project. Contractor warrants to Owner that any GC- CA -H -15 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 , Materials and equipment furnished under the Contract Documents shall be new unless otherwise specified, and that all Work shall be of good quality, free from all defects and in conformance with the Contract Documents. Contractor further warrants to Owner that all materials and equipment furnished under the Contract Documents shall be applied, installed, connected, erected, used, cleaned and conditioned in accordance with the instructions of the applicable manufacturers, fabricators, suppliers or processors except as otherwise provided for in the Contract Documents. If, within one (1) year after substantial completion, any Work is found to be defective or not in conformance with the Contract Documents, Contractor shall correct it promptly after receipt of written notice from Owner. Contractor shall also be responsible for and pay for replacement or repair of adjacent materials or Work, which may be damaged as a result of such replacement or repair. These warranties are in addition to those implied warranties to which Owner is entitled as a matter of law. 21.2 No later than 30 days prior to expiration of the warranty, the Project Manager, or any other representative of the Owner, shall conduct an inspection of the warranted work to verify compliance with the requirements of the Agreement. The Contractor's Representative shall be present at the time of inspection and shall take remedial actions to correct any deficiencies noted in the inspection. Failure of the Contractor to correct the cited deficiencies shall be grounds for the County to disqualify the Contractor from future County bid opportunities. 22. TESTS AND INSPECTIONS. 22.1. Owner, Design Professional, their respective representatives, agents and employees, and governmental agencies with jurisdiction over the Project shall have access at all times to the Work, whether the Work is being performed on or off of the Project site, for their observation, inspection and testing. Contractor shall provide proper, safe conditions for such access. Contractor shall provide Project Manager with timely notice of readiness of the Work for all required inspections, tests or approvals. 22.2. If the Contract Documents or any codes, laws, ordinances, rules or regulations of any public authority having jurisdiction over the Project requires any portion of the Work to be specifically inspected, tested or approved, Contractor shall assume full responsibility therefore, pay all costs in connection therewith and furnish Project Manager the required certificates of inspection, testing or approval. Ail inspections, tests or approvals shall be performed in a manner and by organizations acceptable to the Project Manager. 22.3. If any Work that is to be inspected, tested or approved is covered without written concurrence from the Project Manager, such work must, if requested by Project Manager, be uncovered for observation. Such uncovering shall be at Contractor's expense unless Contractor has given Project Manager timely notice of Contractor's intention to cover the same and Project Manager has not acted with reasonable promptness to respond to such notice. If any Work is covered contrary to written directions from Project Manager, such Work must, if requested by Project Manager, be uncovered for Project Manager's observation and be replaced at Contractor's sole expense. GC- CA -H -16 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 If 22.4. The Owner shall charge to Contractor and may deduct from any payments due Contractor all engineering and inspection expenses incurred by Owner in connection with any overtime work. Such overtime work consisting of any work during the construction period beyond the regular eight (8) hour day and for any work performed on Saturday, Sunday or holidays. 22.5. Neither observations nor other actions by the Project Manager or Design Professional nor inspections, tests or approvals by others shall relieve Contractor from Contractor's obligations to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. 23. DEFECTIVE WORK. 23.1. Work not conforming to the requirements of the Contract Documents or any warranties made or assigned by Contractor to Owner shall be deemed defective Work. If required by Project Manager, Contractor shall as directed, either correct all defective Work, whether or not fabricated, installed or completed, or if the defective Work has been rejected by Project Manager, remove it from the site and replace it with non - defective Work. Contractor shall bear all direct, indirect and consequential costs of such correction or removal (including, but not limited to fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys and other professionals) made necessary thereby, and shall hold Owner harmless for same. 23.2. If the Project Manager consider it necessary or advisable that covered Work be observed by Design Professional or inspected or tested by others, Contractor, at Project Manager's request, shall uncover, expose or otherwise make available for observation, inspection or tests as Project Manager may require, that portion of the Work in question, furnishing all necessary labor, material and equipment. If it is found that such Work is defective, Contractor shall bear all direct, indirect and consequential costs of such uncovering, exposure, observation, inspection and testing and of satisfactory reconstruction (including, but not limited to, fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys and other professionals), and Owner shall be entitled to an appropriate decrease in the Contract Amount. If, however, such Work is not found to be defective, Contractor shall be allowed an increase in the Contract Amount and /or an extension to the Contract Time, directly attributable to such uncovering, exposure, observation, inspection, testing and reconstruction. 23.3. If any portion of the Work is defective, or if Contractor fails to supply sufficient skilled workers, suitable materials or equipment or fails to finish or perform the Work in such a way that the completed Work will conform to the Contract Documents, Project Manager may order Contractor to stop the Work, or any portion thereof, until the cause for such order has been eliminated; however, this right of Project Manager to stop the Work shall not give rise to any duty on the part of Owner or Project Manager to exercise this right for the benefit of Contractor or any other party. GC- CA -H -17 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 23.4. Should the Owner determine, at its sole opinion, it is in the Owner's best interest to accept defective Work, the Owner may do so. Contractor shall bear all direct, indirect and consequential costs attributable to the Owner's evaluation of and determination to accept defective Work. If such determination is rendered prior to final payment, a Change Order shall be executed evidencing such acceptance of such defective Work, incorporating the necessary revisions in the Contract Documents and reflecting an appropriate decrease in the Contract Amount. If the Owner accepts such defective Work after final payment, Contractor shall promptly pay Owner an appropriate amount to adequately compensate Owner for its acceptance of the defective Work. 23.5. If Contractor fails, within a reasonable time after the written notice from Project Manager, to correct defective Work or to remove and replace rejected defective Work as required by Project Manager or Owner, or if Contractor fails to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents, or if Contractor fails to comply with any of the provisions of the Contract Documents, Owner may, after seven (7) days written notice to Contractor, correct and remedy any such deficiency. To the extent necessary to complete corrective and remedial action, Owner may exclude Contractor from any or all of the Project site, take possession of all or any part of the Work, and suspend Contractor's services related thereto, take possession of Contractor's tools, appliances, construction equipment and machinery at the Project site and incorporate in the Work all materials and equipment stored at the Project site or for which Owner has paid Contractor but which are stored elsewhere. Contractor shall allow Owner, Design Professional and their respective representatives, agents, and employees such access to the Project site as may be necessary to enable Owner to exercise the rights and remedies under this paragraph. All direct, indirect and consequential costs of Owner in exercising such rights and remedies shall be charged against Contractor, and a Change Order shall be issued, incorporating the necessary revisions to the Contract Documents, including an appropriate decrease to the Contract Amount. Such direct, indirect and consequential costs shall include, but not be limited to, fees and charges of engineers, architects, attorneys and other professionals, all court costs and all costs of repair and replacement of work of others destroyed or damaged by correction, removal or replacement of Contractor's defective Work. Contractor shall not be allowed an extension of the Contract Time because of any delay in performance of the Work attributable to the exercise by Owner of Owner's rights and remedies hereunder. 24. SUPERVISION AND SUPERINTENDENTS. 24.1. Contractor shall plan, organize, supervise, schedule, monitor, direct and control the Work competently and efficiently, devoting such attention thereto and applying such skills and expertise as may be necessary to perform the Work in accordance with the Contract Documents. Contractor shall be responsible to see that the finished Work complies accurately with the Contract Documents. Contractor shall keep on the Work at all times during its progress a competent resident superintendent, who shall not be replaced without prior written notice to Project Manager except under extraordinary GC- CA -H -18 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 circumstances. The superintendent shall be employed by the Contractor and be the Contractor's representative at the Project site and shall have authority to act on behalf of Contractor. All communications given to the superintendent shall be as binding as if given to the Contractor. Owner shall have the right to direct Contractor to remove and replace its .Project superintendent, with or without cause. 24.2 Contractor shall have a competent superintendent on the project at all times whenever contractor's work crews, or work crews of other parties authorized by the Project Manager are engaged in any activity whatsoever associated with the Project. Should the contractor fail to comply with the above condition, the Project Manager shall, at his discretion, deduct from the Contractor's monthly pay estimate, sufficient moneys to account for the Owner's loss of adequate project supervision, not as a penalty, but as liquidated damages, separate from the liquidated damages described in Section 5.13, for services not rendered. 25. PROTECTION OF WORK. 25.1. Contractor shall fully protect the Work from loss or damage and shall bear the cost of any such loss or damage until final payment has been made. If Contractor or any one for whom Contractor is legally liable for is responsible for any loss or damage to the Work, or other work or materials of Owner or Owner's separate contractors, Contractor shall be charged with the same, and any moneys necessary to replace such loss or damage shall be deducted from any amounts due Contractor. 25.2. Contractor shall not load nor permit any part of any structure to be loaded in any manner that will endanger the structure, nor shall Contractor subject any part of the Work or adjacent property to stresses or pressures that will endanger it. 25.3. Contractor shall not disturb any benchmark established by the Owner or Design Professional with respect to the Project. If Contractor, or its subcontractors, agents or anyone for whom Contractor is legally liable, disturbs the Owner or Design Professional's benchmarks, Contractor shall immediately notify Project Manager and Design Professional. The Owner or Design Professional shall re- establish the benchmarks and Contractor shall be liable for all costs incurred by Owner associated therewith. 26. EMERGENCIES. 26.1. In the event of an emergency affecting the safety or protection of persons or the Work or property at the Project site or adjacent thereto, Contractor, without special instruction or authorization from Owner or Design Professional is obligated to act to prevent threatened damage, injury or loss. Contractor shall give Project Manager written notice within forty -eight (48) hours after the occurrence of the emergency, if GC- CA -H -19 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 Contractor believes that any significant changes in the Work or variations from the Contract Documents have been caused thereby. If the Project Manager determines that a change in the Contract Documents is required because of the action taken in response to an emergency, a Change Order shall be issued to document the consequences of the changes or variations. If Contractor fails to provide the forty -eight (48) hour written notice noted above, the Contractor shall be deemed to have waived any right it otherwise may have had to seek an adjustment to the Contract Amount or an extension to the Contract Time. 27. USE OF PREMISES. 27.1. Contractor shall maintain all construction equipment, the storage of materials and equipment and the operations of workers to the Project site and land and areas identified in and permitted by the Contract Documents and other lands and areas permitted by law, rights of way, permits and easements, and shall not unreasonably encumber the Project site with construction equipment or other material or equipment. Contractor shall assume full responsibility for any damage to any such land or area, or to the owner or occupant thereof, or any land or areas contiguous thereto, resulting from the performance of the Work. 28. SAFETY. 28.1. Contractor shall be responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work. Contractor shall take all necessary precautions for the safety of, and shall provide the necessary protection to prevent damage, injury or loss to: 28.1.1. All employees on or about the project site and other persons and /or organizations who may be affected thereby; 28.1.2. All the Work and materials and equipment to be incorporated therein, whether in storage on or off the Project site; and 28.1.3. Other property on Project site or adjacent thereto, including trees, shrubs, walks, pavements, roadways, structures, utilities and any underground structures or improvements not designated for removal, relocation or replacement in the Contract Documents. 28.2. Contractor shall comply with all applicable codes, laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of any public body having jurisdiction for the safety of persons or property or to protect them from damage, injury or loss. Contractor shall erect and maintain all necessary safeguards for such safety and protection. Contractor shall notify owners of adjacent property and of underground structures and improvements and utility owners when prosecution of the Work may affect them, and shall cooperate with them in the protection, removal, relocation or replacement of their property. Contractor's duties and responsibilities for the safety and protection of the Work shall continue until such time as the Work is completed and final acceptance of same by Owner has occurred. GC- CA -H -20 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 28.3. Contractor shall designate a responsible representative at the Project site whose duty shall be the prevention of accidents. This person shall be Contractor's superintendent unless otherwise designated in writing by Contractor to Owner. 29. PROJECT MEETINGS. Prior to the commencement of Work, the Contractor shall attend a pre- construction conference with the Project Manager, Design Professional and others as appropriate to discuss the Progress Schedule, procedures for handling shop drawings and other submittals, and for processing Applications for Payment, and to establish a working understanding among the parties as to the Work. During the prosecution of the Work, the Contractor shall attend any and all meetings convened by the Project Manager with respect to the Project, when directed to do so by Project Manager or Design Professional. The Contractor shall have its subcontractors and suppliers attend all such meetings (including the pre- construction conference) as may be directed by the Project Manager. 30. VENDOR PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Collier County has implemented a Vendor Performance Evaluation System for all contracts awarded in excess of $25,000. To this end, vendors will be evaluated on their performance upon completion /termination of agreement. 31. MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC POLICY For all projects that require the contractor to provide traffic control, the Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Collier County's Maintenance of Traffic Policy, copies of which are available through the Risk Management or Purchasing Departments. 32. DIRECT PURCHASE OF GOODS AND MATERIALS The County reserves the right to require Contractor to assign some or all of its agreements with material suppliers directly to the County. Any such goods and /or materials purchased by the County pursuant to such an assignment of a material supply agreement shall be referred to as "County Furnished Materials" and the responsibilities of both the County and the Contractor relating to said materials shall be governed by the terms and conditions of this Bid which shall take precedence over other conditions and terms of this Bid where inconsistencies or conflicts exist. GC- CA -H -21 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 Additionally, the County; at it's sole option; may choose to purchase some or all of the goods and /or materials from other suppliers. In either instance the County may require the following information from the Contractor: 1. Required quantities of material. 2. Specifications relating to goods and/or materials required for job including brand and /or model number or type if applicable 3. Pricing and availability of goods and /or materials provided under Contractor's agreements with material suppliers 2. Purchasing Upon receipt of a proper requisition (including appropriate backup material(s), the Purchasing Department shall issue a Purchase Order for the material required. Each Purchase Order shall contain the County's certificate of exemption number. The Purchase order shall be given to the Project Manager for completion of the ordering process. Unless the following items were included in the quote provided by the vendor to the Project Manager, the Purchase Order shall also provide for reimbursement of the cost to the supplier for: A. Shipping and handling B. Insurance costs C. Performance Bond 3. General Terms and Conditions A. Contractor shall be required to maintain records of all County- furnished materials that it incorporates into the project from the stock of County - furnished materials in its possession. Such records shall be furnished monthly to the Project Manager or their designee and shall include information on materials that have 1. Been delivered into the Contractor's possession and /or 2. been incorporated into the project. B. Notwithstanding the transfer of County- furnished materials by the County to the Contractor's possession, the County shall retain legal and equitable title to any and all County - furnished materials. C. The transfer of possession of County- furnished materials from the County to the Contractor shall constitute a bailment for the mutual benefit of the County and the Contractor. The County shall be considered the bailor, and the Contractor the bailee for the County- furnished materials. County- furnished materials shall be considered returned to the County for purposes of their bailment at such time as they are incorporated into the Project. GC- CA -H -22 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 D. The County shall purchase and maintain insurance sufficient to protect against any loss or damage to County - furnished materials. Such insurance shall cover the replacement cost of any County- furnished materials not yet incorporated into the Project during the period between the time the County first takes title to any such materials and the time when the last of said materials are incorporated into the project. E. The County shall in no way be liable for any interruption or delay in the project, for any defects or other problems with the project, or for any additional costs resulting from any delay in the delivery of, or defects in, County- furnished materials, except in the event of the County's gross negligence or willful misconduct. F. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating a partnership between the County and the Contractor or to constitute the Contractor as an agent of the County. GC- CA -H -23 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 EXHIBIT I SUPPLEMENTAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. Change Orders. Notwithstanding anything in the Contract Documents to the contrary, Change Orders may be approved by the County Manager or his designee as provided for in the County's purchasing policy effective at the time that the change order is processed. GC- CA -1 -1 2/25/2002 9:08 AM EXHIBIT J (Reserved) GC- CA -J -1 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 ; EXHIBIT K PERMITS GC- CA -K -1 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 EXHIBIT L STANDARD DETAILS See Drawing A -1 GC- CA -L -1 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 EXHIBIT M PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS Add Statements regarding the following: Frequency of Progress Meetings Pre - installation meetings Pre - construction meetings Final Walk Through meetings Special meetings Agenda Preparation (jointly prepared by PM & C, PM to record minutes and submit to Attendees within 72 hours of meeting) GC- CA -M -1 2/25/2002 9:08 AM 16D 6 1 � RESOLUTION NO. 02- 120 16E RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN EMPLOYEE HEALTH AND WELLNESS PREVENTION, INCENTIVE AND REIMBURSEMENT PROGRAM TO REWARD EMPLOYEES WHO PARTICIPATE IN COUNTY SPONSORED OR ENDORSED HEALTH AND WELLNESS PROGRAMS. WHEREAS, Collier County Government desires to be an employer of excellence; and WHERAS, the Risk Management Department is presently seeking to adopt more innovative and effective health and wellness programs for-its employees; and WHEREAS, the occurrence of preventable illness among county employees and their covered dependents is costly to the County in terms of health care expenditures, missed work days, reduced productivity, and reduced morale; and WHEREAS, many private and public employers have implemented or are considering implementing various health and wellness incentives to reduce health care expenditures, reduce lost work days, increase productivity, and improve morale; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: This Resolution to approve the initiation of an Employee Health and Wellness Prevention, Incentive, and Reimbursement Program is hereby adopted. Under this program, employees who participate in County sponsored wellness programs which may include but not be limited to health fairs, exercise incentives, smoking cessation programs, nutrition counseling, medical screenings and tests, disease - specific prevention and management programs, inoculations, weight management, and other programs intended to prevent the onset of disease, manage disease, and /or address issues of morbidity shall be eligible for payment or reimbursement for their participation depending upon the type of program offered. Such payment or reimbursement shall not exceed $100 per participant per program. The Risk Management Director shall be authorized to implement procedures to manage this program. In addition, this Resolution shall authorize the expenditure of funds for the promotion of health and wellness programs subject to the requirements of the Collier County Purchasing Policy. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote, favoring same. DATE;., 2002 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST,. Dwight E: Brock, CLERK By: Jame". Coletta, CHAIRMAN Deputy Clerk - - Attast as too Chafraan,s slIPStA . •1tj, Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: By: Ramiro Manalic Chief Assistant County Attorney 16E5 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 16E 8 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this day of , 2002 between the BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND FIRE CONTROL AND RESCUE EASTRICT, a Special District created by Laws of Florida , Chapter 77 -535, as amended, (hereinafter referred to as the "District ") whose mailing address is 13240 Immokalee Road, Naples, Florida 34120, and COLLIER COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ACTING IN THEIR CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE GAC LAND TRUST, (hereinafter referred to as "County "), whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112 WHEREAS, County has acquired 1,061.5 acres, located in Collier County, Florida (hereinafter referred to as "Property "), from Avatar Properties Inc. f /k/a/ GAC Properties Inc. in accordance with the November 15, 1983 Agreement between Avatar Properties Inc. and Collier County, (hereinafter referred to as the "1983 Agreement "); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the 1983 Agreement, the Property deeded to the County and /or the monetary proceeds acquired from the subsequent sale of said Property are to be used to provide governmental facilities within and for the geographical area known as "Golden Gate Estates "; and WHEREAS, the County currently has funds derived from the use and /or sale of a portion of the above - described Property; and WHEREAS, the District has requested funds to purchase Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for thirty (30) of its fire fighters; and WHEREAS, the County has determined that a disbursement of a portion of said funds to the District is in accordance with the intent of the provisions of the 1983 Agreement and accomplishes the purposes of said 1983 Agreement by providing Personal Protective Equipment necessary to bring all personnel into compliance with the newest standards for personal protection, as defined by the National Fire Protection Association; which will provide adequate protection for the fire fighters when performing their duties of fire and rescue protection to the residents of the Golden Gate Estates area; and WHEREAS, Avatar Properties Inc. has provided a "Letter of No Objection ", dated , approving the use of funds derived from the sale of Property to acquire necessary PPE for the District's use. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises which are incorporated herein and made part of this Agreement, and in further consideration of the mutual covenants set forth below, and other good and valuable consideration, acknowledged by the parties to be sufficient, just and adequate, the parties hereto do agree as follows: 1. The County hereby agrees to contribute a maximum of Thirty Five Thousand Eight Hundred Fifty Dollars ($35,850.00) of the total funds to be expended by the District for purposes hereinafter stated, (hereinafter referred to as the "Funds "), in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, provided said Funds are to be used solely for the purpose of purchasing the items listed on the attached Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and made a part hereof, (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Equipment "). 2. The District agrees and warrants that the Equipment purchased with the Funds shall be utilized solely by the District for the primary purposes of providing fire and rescue protection to the area of "Golden Gate Estates ". 3. The District hereby agrees that the purchase of the Equipment has been or shall be in accordance with all applicable bidding or other requirements for the procurement of property and services as set forth in Chapter 287, Florida Statutes, and such other statutory provisions as may apply. The District hereby agrees that the purchase of the Equipment shall be conducted in a manner consistent with the Board of County Commissioner's purchasing policy and in proper coordination with the County's Purchasing Department prior to the ordering or receiving of any goods or services purchased under this Agreement. 4. Payment of the Funds for the Equipment shall be in accordance with the following procedure: (1) After delivery of said Equipment to the District, the District shall deliver to the Real Property Management Director for approval prior to any payment made to the District: (a) Copies of any and all invoices for said Equipment, clearly stating the purpose of said invoices and indicating that the invoices have been paid in full. 8 16E (b) A letter from the District, signed by the Chairperson, stating that the Equipment has been received and accepted in good order and directing the County to reimburse the District upon payment of the invoices for those items listed in Exhibit "A" for purposes specified in this Agreement. (2) Within thirty (30) days after receipt and approval of the above - described documents and verification that all invoices have been paid in full by the District, if not already provided, a County warrant for payment shall be prepared and made payable to the District and shall be forwarded directly to the District by the County. In no way, shall the total amount to be paid exceed $35,850. (3) The Equipment shall be purchased by the District within six (6) months of the execution of the Agreement by both parties. In the event that the Equipment is not purchased by the District within six (6) months from the execution of this Agreement, it is understood and agreed by the parties that the District shall refund and repay to County, within thirty (30) days, any and all Funds which have been provided to the District pursuant to the provisions of this Agreement. (4) If the District obtains any monies as a gift, contribution or reimbursement, through any grant program, pertaining to the purchase of said Equipment, such gift, contribution or reimbursement shall be, within ten (10) days of receipt by District, forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners for deposit into the GAC Land Trust Account as reimbursement of Funds provided for by this Agreement. District agrees to prepare and submit the appropriate grant applications whereby verification of such application, and its approval or denial, shall be provided to the County within thirty (30) days of submittal and /or receipt. (5) The District covenants and agrees that upon the payment of all or any portion from the Funds in accordance with the obligation contained in this Agreement it shall be the further obligation of the District to pay any remaining balance required to complete the purchase of any other Equipment required. 5. The District agrees to obtain and maintain insurance coverage in an amount sufficient to provide for full repair and/or replacement of Equipment in the event the Equipment is damaged or destroyed. 6. The District covenants and agrees that this Agreement is solely between the County and the District and, although the County shall reimburse the District for all or only a portion of the Funds on behalf of the District, the County shall have no direct or indirect liability to the vendor of Equipment or any other third party resulting from this Agreement. 7. District agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold the County harmless from any and all claims, actions, causes of action or liabilities including attorney's fees and costs arising from or in any way connected with the use of the Funds or the selection, purchase, delivery or use of the Equipment by the District, its agents, employees, or in any way related to the use of the Equipment by the District, its agents, employees or any third party. 8. The District understands and agrees that the Funds to be provided to the District in accordance with the terms of this Agreement have been derived from and are being provided solely for the sale and/or use of a portion of the Property conveyed to the County pursuant to the 1983 Agreement administered and managed by the County for the GAC Land Trust and that such Funds are currently in County Fund 605- 122390 (The GAC Trust Land Sales Fund). The District further understands and agrees that no ad valorem taxes, revenues or moneys form other sources have been committed or will be committed by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners for the purposes set forth in this Agreement. 9. The District agrees that following purchase, and at all times thereafter, the Equipment shall be used to provide for fire and rescue protection within the geographical area commonly known as "Golden Gate Estates ". This Agreement is not intended, however, to preclude the use of the Equipment within non - estates areas of the District so long as the primary use is for efficient fire and rescue protection services within Golden Gate Estates. 10. In the event that the Equipment ceases to be utilized by the District as described in Paragraph 2, or if the Equipment ceases to be used in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the District agrees that the District shall pay to the County, within thirty (30) days, an amount equal to the fair market value of the Equipment as of the date the Equipment ceases to be used by the District as described in Paragraph 2 or the date the Equipment ceases to be used in accordance with this Agreement. The fair market value shall be determined by a third party, selected by the County, who is determined to be qualified to establish the valuation of said Equipment. 16E 8 11. This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. 12. Any notice required by this Agreement shall be addressed to the parties at the address set forth below: IF TO THE COUNTY: Collier County c/o Real Property Management Department Administration Building 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 IF TO THE DISTRICT: Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District 13240 Immokalee Road Naples, Florida 34120 13. This Agreement represents the entire Agreement between the parties, and no promise, representation, warranty or covenant not included in this Agreement or any such referenced agreements has been or is being relied upon by either party. No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless made in writing and executed and dated by both parties. 14. This Agreement may not be assigned. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, District and County have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the day and year first above written. QS'TO COO Y: ATED:`, z 7 ,,EST DWkGHT E� �PCK, Clerk •rte; Att* it' = CMiran s sivdirri "1' . AS TO DISTR CT: DATED: /d 0 9— DONNA M. LIHACH, Secretary Approved as to form and legal ufficiency: H idi F. As ton Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY CO ISSIONERS COLLIER COU , FLOJ ID By: >' JAMS". COLETTA, Chairman 16E 8 EXHIBIT "A" The following is projected costs for Personal Protection Equipment for thirty (30) fire fighters Quaker Safety Products Turnout Gear QSD -103 30" Style Coat 7.0 QSY Advance Outer Shell Stedair 2000 Moisture Barrier Caldura Quilt Thermal Liner 3" NYC Triple Trim BCIFR on Top of Back of Coat 3 EA 2 Scotchlite #S on a Velcro Patch Radio Pocket MIC Clip, universal clip NFPA Handwarmer Pockets 7 "Kelvar Thumb Wristlets 6" Rib Back Pant Advance Outer Shell Stedair 2000 Moisture Barrier Caldura Quilt Thermal Liner 3" Scotchlite Triple Trim Around the Legs Bellows Pockets Fabric Reinforced Padded Knees 2" Heavy Duty Back Suspenders Total Per Fire Fighter $ 875.00 Chieftain Traditional Helmet w/Leather Shield Total Per Fire Fighter $ 185.00 Black Diamond Rubber Boots w /tibia Protector Steel Toe & Shank, Lug Sole Total Per Fire Fighter $ 85.00 Protector Gloves w /gauntlet Total Per Fire Fighter $ 35.00 Mifflin Valley Nomex 2 -ply Hood Total Per Fire Fighter $ 15.00 TOTAL FOR 30 FIRE FIGHTERS $35,850.00 16E 9 AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made this Z6;6k day of � , 2002 between the BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND FIRE CONTROL AND RESCU DISTRICT, a Special District created by Laws of Florida, Chapter 77 -535, as amended, (hereinafter referred to as the "District ") whose mailing address is 13240 Immokalee Road, Naples, Florida 34120, and COLLIER COUNTY, A POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA, BY ITS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ACTING IN THEIR CAPACITY AS TRUSTEE OF THE GAC LAND TRUST, (hereinafter referred to as "County "), whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112 WHEREAS, County has acquired 1,061.5 acres, located in Collier County, Florida (hereinafter referred to as "Property "), from Avatar Properties Inc. f /k/a/ GAC Properties Inc. in accordance with the November 15, 1983 Agreement between Avatar Properties Inc. and Collier County, (hereinafter referred to as the "1983 Agreement "); and WHEREAS, pursuant to the 1983 Agreement, the Property deeded to the County and /or the monetary proceeds acquired from the subsequent sale of said Property are to be used to provide governmental facilities within and for the geographical area known as "Golden Gate Estates "; and WHEREAS, the District and County entered into an Agreement dated June 23, 1987 ( "Original Agreement ") wherein the District was authorized to use GAC funds in the amount of $100,000 for the purchase of a fire (pumper) truck. A stipulation of the Agreement provided that if the truck ceased to be used primarily for fire protection within Golden Gate Estates, the District agreed that the fire truck would be forfeited to the County or the District would pay to the County an amount equal to current fair market value of the truck. The stipulation further provided that the amount to be paid to the County by District may be used by the District for other fire protection related uses within Golden Gate Estates if the Board of County Commissioners approved, in writing, such uses; and WHEREAS, Elite Fire & Safety Equipment, Inc. established a fair market value of $40,500 for the 1987 fire (pumper) truck; and WHEREAS, the County has determined that authorizing the District to utilize the fair market value of $40,500 as a trade -in towards the purchase of a new pumper is in accordance with the intent of the provisions of the 1983 Agreement and accomplishes the purposes of said 1983 Agreement by providing added fire and rescue protection to the residents of the Golden Gate Estates area; and WHEREAS, Avatar Properties Inc. has provided a "Letter of No Objection ", dated , approving the District's use of the trade -in value towards the purchase of a new pumper; and WHEREAS, the District and the County desire to terminate the Original Agreement and enter into this Agreement. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises which are incorporated herein and made part of this Agreement, and in further consideration of the mutual covenants set forth below, and other good and valuable consideration, acknowledged by the parties to be sufficient, just and adequate, the parties hereto do agree as follows: 1. The County hereby agrees to authorize the District to utilize the fair market value of $40,500 as a trade -in towards the purchase of a new pumper truck by the District to be utilized by the District for purposes hereinafter stated, (hereinafter referred to as the "New Truck "). 2. The District agrees and warrants that the New Truck shall be utilized solely by the District for the primary purposes of providing fire and rescue protection to the area of "Golden Gate Estates ". 3. The District hereby agrees that the purchase of the New Truck has been or shall be in accordance with all applicable bidding or other requirements for the procurement of property and services as set forth in Chapter 287, Florida Statutes, and such other statutory provisions as may apply. The District hereby agrees that the purchase of the New Truck shall be conducted in a manner consistent with the Board of County Commissioner's purchasing policy and in proper coordination with the County's Purchasing Department prior to the ordering or receiving of any goods or services purchased under this Agreement. 4. Purchase of the New Truck shall be in accordance with the following procedure: (1) The New Truck shall be purchased by the District within twelve (12) months of the execution of the Agreement by both parties. In the event that the New Truck is not purchased by the District within twelve (12) months from the execution of this Agreement, it is understood and agreed 1\ L GE 9 by the parties that the District shall refund and repay to County, within thirty (30) days, the sum of $40,500. (2) The District covenants and agrees that upon the utilization of the New Truck in accordance with the obligation contained in this Agreement, it shall be the further obligation of the District to pay any remaining balance required to complete the purchase of the New Truck. 5. The District agrees to obtain and maintain insurance coverage in an amount sufficient to provide for full repair and/or replacement of New Truck in the event the New Truck is damaged or destroyed. 6. The District covenants and agrees that this Agreement is solely between the County and the District and the County shall have no direct or indirect liability to the vendor of the New Truck or any other third party resulting from this Agreement. 7. District agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold the County harmless from any and all claims, actions, causes of action or liabilities including attorney's fees and costs arising from or in any way connected with the use of the Trade -In or the selection, purchase, delivery or use of the New Truck by the District, its agents, employees, or in any way related to the use of the New Truck by the District, its agents, employees or any third party. 8. The District understands and agrees that the proceeds of the New Truck has been derived from and are being provided solely for the sale and /or use of a portion of the Property conveyed to the County pursuant to the 1983 Agreement administered and managed by the County for the GAC Land Trust. The District further understands and agrees that no ad valorem taxes, revenues or moneys form other sources have been committed or will be committed by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners for the purposes set forth in this Agreement. 9. The District agrees that following purchase, and at all times thereafter, the New Truck shall be used to provide for fire and rescue protection within the geographical area commonly known as "Golden Gate Estates ". This Agreement is not intended, however, to preclude the use of the New Truck within non - estates areas of the District so long as the primary use is for efficient fire and rescue protection services within Golden Gate Estates. 10. In the event that the New Truck ceases to be utilized by the District as described in Paragraph 2, or if the New Truck ceases to be used in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, the District agrees that the District shall pay to the County, within thirty (30) days, an amount equal to the fair market value of the New Truck at that time, such amount not to exceed the amount of $40.500. Such amount to be paid to the County may be used by the District for other fire protection related uses within Golden Gate Estates if the Board of County Commissioners approves, in writing, such uses. 11. This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. 12. Any notice required by this Agreement shall be addressed to the parties at the address set forth below: IF TO THE COUNTY: Collier County c/o Real Property Management Department Administration Building 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 IF TO THE DISTRICT: Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control and Rescue District 13240 Immokalee Road Naples, Florida 34120 13. This Agreement represents the entire Agreement between the parties, and no promise, representation, warranty or covenant not included in this Agreement or any such referenced agreements has been or is being relied upon by either party. No modification or amendment of this Agreement shall be of any force or effect unless made in writing and executed and dated by both parties. 14. This Agreement is not assignable. 15. The Original Agreement is hereby terminated. 16E 9 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, District and County have caused this Agreement to be duly executed on the day and year first above written. AS_,TQ CPUf�TY: -DATED'. ;`ATTEST: „ DV/IGHT -E , BREICK, Clerk Att#!'t. M�NinsllA'= AS TO DISTRICT: DATED: �- A DONNA M. LIHACH, Secretary Approved as to form and I e al sufficiency : /.(' . Heidi F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF aza; HS COLLIER CO By: JAME . COLETTA, Chairman BIG CORKSCREW ISLAN FIRE CONTROL ISTRICT By: GE E H. ECKHARDT, Chairman 16 Wireless t: ; r s for-Communi Development i t Environmental ar r: � =f In Response to 01-3282 October 5, 2001, 4:34 pm (EST) Submitted to; Purchasing Department Collier County Government Center 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Maples, FIB 34112 Submitted by: Dua Computer Resources, Inc. (DCR) 100 E. Minton Blvd. #203A Delray Beach, Florida - 33483 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY I. 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. TABLE OF CONTENT'S 16E10 01 -3282 Proposer's Credentials .............................................................................. ..............................3 1.1 Capabilities 3 1.2 Wireless Application Projects .......... ................................. ............................... ...........4 1.2.1 Engineering Change Management ........................................ ............................... 4 1.2.2 Field Service Supply Chain ................................................... ............................... 4 1.2.3 Facilities Management System .............................................. ............................... S 1.2.4 Entail over Phone ................................................................... ............................... 5 1.2.5 National Account Customer Tracking Software .................... ............................... S StaffCredentials ......................................................................................... ..............................6 2.1 Office Location Of Each Team Member............ ............................... ............................... 7 2.2 A Complete Resume of Each Team Member .................................... ............................... 7 References.................................................................................................. .............................12 Plan..... ......................................................................................................... .............................13 4.1 Statement of the Problem .................................................................. .............................13 4.2 Software Development ..................................................................... .............................13 4.3 Interface to County's Business Systems ............................................ .............................16 4.4 Timeline 16 4.5 Suggested Hardware 17 4.6 Training 17 4.7 Technical Support 17 FeeProposal .............................................................................................. .............................19 Supplementalinformation ...................................................................... ............................... 19 Appendix - web pages for the application ............................................ ............................... 20 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 AGREEMENT 16E10 THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this Twenty -Sixth day of February 2002, by and between Dua Computer Resources, Inc, whose business address is 100 E. Linton Blvd. #203A Delray Beach, Fl 33483 hereinafter called the "Contractor" and Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Collier County, Naples, hereinafter called the "County ": WITNESSETH: 1. COMMENCEMENT. This Agreement shall commence the work upon execution of this Agreement based upon a schedule mutually agreed upon in writing by County and Contractor. The contract shall be for a sixty (60) day initial installation period, unless otherwise directed by the Department of Community Development & Environmental Services Director or their designee. Additional departmental installation time frames shall be mutually agreed upon in writing by the County Departments and the Contractor and shall be included in the individually numbered Exhibits as set forth below, subsequently attached to this Agreement and incorporated herein by reference. This Agreement shall be in effect for two (2) years with two (2) additional one (1) year renewal options with the consent of the Contractor. Subsequent renewals to extend this Agreement shall be approved by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. STATEMENT OF WORK. The Contractor shall provide services in accordance with the Scope of Services of RFP 01 -3282, the Contractor's Proposal, Initial Installation Proposal as per Exhibit "A ", Source code ownership as per Exhibit "B ", Fee Schedule Exhibit "C ", hereto attached and incorporated herein by reference, as well as additional services as required and mutually agreed upon in writing by County Departments and Contractor. Each additional departmental installation requirement as to software, services and schedule shall be mutually agreed upon in writing by the County Departments and Contractor and attached as individually identified Exhibits as per above. The department shall then issue a requisition to create a purchase order, which will serve as authorization for the individual installation. Said Exhibits shall be fully a part of this Agreement and shall be incorporated herein by reference. The individual Department (s) shall procure all software and hardware licenses for subsequent installations. The individual Department (s) shall also be responsible for setting up the necessary infrastructure and for providing any additional special hardware and software not covered by this Agreement that will be required for the completion of their specific project. 1 16E10 3. THE CONTRACT SUM. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Agreement for the initial installation in an amount not to exceed twenty thousand, eighty five dollars ($20,085.00), as per Exhibit "A ", based on the conditions set forth below and in the Contractor's proposal, subject to Change Orders as approved in advance by the County. The contract amount for additional departmental installations and/or additional services shall be mutually agreed upon in writing by the Contractor and County Departments as per subsequent Exhibits. Pricing for software and services purchased under this Agreement shall be firm and fixed through February 28,2004 as per Exhibit "C" attached. Any price increases for the renewal periods shall not exceed the Southern Region Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the previous twelve (12) month period. 4. COMPENSATION. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Agreement upon completion of the initial work as accepted and approved by the Director of Community Development & Environmental Services or their designee. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Agreement for additional departmental installations upon completion or partial completion of the work tasks as accepted and approved by the Department Directors or their designees pursuant to the Contractor's proposal and schedule included in each individually numbered Exhibit. Payments shall be made to the Contractor when requested as work progresses, but not more frequently than once per month. Payment will be made upon receipt of a proper invoice and in compliance with Section 218.70, Fla. Statutes, otherwise known as the "Florida Prompt Payment Act ". Travel expenses shall be reimbursed at the rates used by Collier County for its employees as per Section 112.061 Florida Statutes. Reimbursements shall be at the following rates: _ Mileage: $ .29 per mile Breakfast: $ 3.00 Lunch: $ 6.00 Dinner: $12.00 Airfare: Actual Ticket Cost Rental Car: Actual rental cost of midsize or small car Lodging: Actual cost of reasonable lodging at single occupancy rate Parking: Actual cost of parking 5. NOTICES. All notices from the County to the Contractor shall be deemed duly served if mailed or faxed to the Contractor at the following Address: Ammu Warrier Dua Computer Resources, Inc. 100 E. Linton Blvd. #203 A Delray Beach, Florida 33483 Fax # 561 -276 -8058 2 16E10 All Notices from the Contractor to the County shall be deemed duly served if mailed or faxed to the County to: Collier County Government Center Purchasing. Department - Purchasing Building 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, Florida 34112 Fax #941 -732 -0844 Attn: Purchasing Director The Contractor and the County may change the above mailing address and /or fax numbers at any time upon giving the other party written notification. All notices under this Service Agreement must be in writing. 6. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating a partnership between the County and the Contractor or to constitute the Contractor as an agent of the County. 7. PERMITS: LICENSES: TAXES. In compliance with Section 218.80, Fla. Stats, all permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be obtained by the Contractor. Payment for all such permits issued by the County shall be processed internally by the County. All non - County permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be procured and paid for by the Contractor. The Contractor shall also be solely responsible for payment of any and all taxes levied on the Contractor. In addition, the Contractor shall comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the U. S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. The Contractor agrees to comply with all laws governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to persons employed by the Contractor. 8. NO IMPROPER USE. The Contractor will not use, nor suffer or permit any person to use in any manner whatsoever, County facilities for any improper, immoral or offensive purpose, or for any purpose in violation of any federal, state, county or municipal ordinance, rule, order or regulation, or of any governmental rule or regulation now in effect or hereafter enacted or adopted. In the event of such violation by the Contractor or if the County or its authorized representative shall deem any conduct on the part of the Contractor to be objectionable or improper, the County shall have the right to suspend the contract of the Contractor. Should the Contractor fail to correct any such violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction of the County within twenty -four (24) hours after receiving notice of such violation, conduct, or practice, such suspension to continue until the violation is cured. The Contractor further agrees not to commence operation during the suspension period until the violation has been corrected to the satisfaction of the County. 3 16E10 9. TERMINATION. Should the contractor be found to have failed to perform his services in a manner satisfactory to the County as per the requirements of this Agreement, the County may terminate said agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a thirty (30) day written notice. The County shall be sole judge of non - performance. 10. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Contractor agrees that there shall be no discrimination as to race, sex, color, creed or national origin. 11. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall provide insurance as per the requirements outlined in RFP #01 -3282 as follows: A. Commercial General Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. B. Workers' Compensation: Insurance covering all employees meeting Florida Statutory Limits, Chapter 440 in compliance with the applicable State and Federal Statutory limits and Requirements. C. Professional Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $500,000 Special Requirements: Collier County shall be listed as the Certificate Holder and included as an Additional Insured on the Comprehensive General Liability Policy. Current, valid insurance policies meeting the requirement herein identified shall be maintained by Contractor during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal certificates shall be sent to the County 30 days prior to any expiration date. There shall be a 30 -day notification to the County in the event of cancellation or modification of any stipulated insurance coverage. Contractor shall insure that all subcontractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. 12. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor/ Vendor, in consideration of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is accepted through the signing of this document, shall hold harmless and defend Collier County and its agents and employees from all suits and actions, including attorneys' fees and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of this contract or work performed thereunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against the County by any employee of the named Contractor /Vendor, any Subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The Contractor/ Vendor's 4 16E10 obligation under this provision shall not be limited in any way by the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Contract or -the Contractor /Vendor's limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. The first One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) of money received on the contract price is considered as payment of this obligation by the County. This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of Collier County. 13. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of the County by the Department of Community Development & Environmental Services Director or their designee. 14. COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS CONTRACT. This Contract consists of the attached component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the contract as if herein set out verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, Insurance Certificate, RFP #01 -3282, Initial Installation Proposal (Exhibit "A "), Source Code Ownership (Exhibit "B "), Fee Schedule (Exhibit "C ") and subsequent Exhibits as set forth in Item 2 "Statement of Work ". 15. SUBJECT TO APPROPRIATION. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties herein that this agreement is subject to appropriation by the Board of County Commissioners. 16. AUTHORITY TO PIGGYBACK The Contractor agrees that any member of the SW Florida Purchasing Consortium or other public entities given prior written approval by the Collier County Purchasing Department may utilize this agreement under the conditions described below. The Contractor hereby further agrees that for each entity given written approval by the County to utilize this option, the Contractor shall provide a check to the County in the amount of three percent (3 °o) of the total annual purchases made under each entity's contract. Contractor shall be required to provide yearly documentation of such entities' total annual purchases in a form approved by the County. 5 16E10 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor and the County, have each, respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. ATTEST: Dwight rk of Courts By• f• ect• _ -x - (fi�°AL� ��t��u_Ml G►�1r�an •f .. i "L Ste first Witness CW TType /print witness name T Second Witness TType /print witness nameT Ap r to form and gals 'ciency: RT rt ac ary Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Dua Computer Resources, Inc. Contractor By: Signature A M m u t�c'--)AR R( , Typed signature and title l3 EAj?— CORPORATE SEAL (corporations only) IPCIS 16E1O September 27, 2001 Information Release To: All Evaluators Collier County DCR has please to announce the availability of a demonstration of the web based application for the Inspection Management System. This is only a demonstration and shows the main screens of the application for the Pocket PC as well as the administrative module. It has been provided as a starting point for discussions with the County and to show case our abilities, knowledge, skill and commitment to the project. You may access the demonstration at ww►vw.der- ine.com/coiHer . PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY LETTER OF TRANMITTAL To Purchasing Department Collier County Government Center 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL -34112 Dear Fred Blatchley: 16E10 01 -3282 Dua Computer Resources, Inc. (hereafter referred to as "DCR" ), acting as prime contractor, presents this proposed solution based on a thorough understanding of the requirements contained in the RFP No. 01- 3282 for Wireless Applications Development. This proposal also reflects results of our years of experience developing similar systems. DCR provides a technology and operating structure that leverages the strengths of our expertise in wireless applications as well as web development experience. Our proposed solution, addresses all of the business and technical requirements as requested in the solicitation. The proposed solution also provides for training and ongoing support and maintenance The DCR team leverages the project delivery methodology, knowledge capital, and experience of former IBM executives who will be dedicated to the project. A "best practices" delivery approach, project management infrastructure, and deliverables based project plan are utilized to establish control over the delivery process. Our project team is a group of business and technology professionals with the right skills, dedication and experience to deliver on- scope, on -time and on- budget. This team has a proven track record in delivering custom application systems and supporting operations for the public and commercial sector. DCR brings solid client references, a solid financial history and an on -going commitment to the Department. The combination of our knowledge capital, delivery capability, financial resources, experience and commitment to quality ensures delivery of a system and infrastructure that will meet the requirements of the Collier County Government. This letter has been signed by Ammu Warrier who is authorized to bind the firm in a contract. Ammu Warner President Dua Computer Resources Inc. 100 E.Linton Blvd., #203A Delray Beach, FL -33483 Ph: 561- 276 -6838 Fax: 561-276-8058 We are looldng for a long business-relationship with the County. Yours simc ly amer PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 2 16E10 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 01 -3282 N DCR was founded in 1995 as an information technology. solutions provider in the owner's house in Boca Raton, FL. Since then it has grown into a corporation with 63 employees and over 9 million in revenue in the year 2000 and relationships with several Fortune 500 companies. DCR's core management has a technical and business education background that makes delivery within the schedule and cost more feasible. DCR started its first project with a testing tool that it developed for Motorola Inc. at its paging facility. The references generated from DCR's first project ensured ongoing projects and DCR is still continuing to do business with its first client. DCR worked with EDS to develop a client - server application for its telecommunications billing system and was later able to adapt the same algorithm for a billing system for Siemens. DCR's President is Ammu Warrier who h M.S. in Computer Engineering from University of Miami. She has worked for two large Federal Crov o�ects or t e e merge ement Agency and experience in working with several large companies. Since starting DCR, she has developed the business from a three person company to 63 employees with a solid organizational structure. Besides 63 full time employees, DCR has also employed W2 contractors for various contracting assignments. DCR is a minority owned business and has been certified by the State of Florida as a Minority Business Enterprise ( "N BE ") and the Small Business Administration as a Small Disadvantaged Business. 1.1 CAPABILI'T'IES Wireless Application Development Expertise: DCR started working with wireless applications in 1998 when it started WAP and WML . 24 AUcrosoft Cert fled Professionals programming for the Palm, Pocket PC and the 0 14 Wireless Application Development iDEN devices. DCR has provided wireless Resoaarces application development services to some of the 23 San Certified .lava Programmers major players in the industry and has developed solutions that provide a wireless interface to various business systems. Some of the detailed projects and solutions that DCR has developed for this platform has been described in the following sections. Application and System Design: DCR's architects and designers use formal methodologies for system design. DCR has experts in UML, Jacobson's Use Cases, Rumbaugh's OMT as well as structured techniques like Yourdon and Ward - Mellor. DCR uses CASE tools including Rational Rose for all object oriented design and ERWin for data modeling. Web Applications Development: DCR's expertise in web application development involves the use of n- tier and distributed application development in Windows NT as well as Unix environment. DCR is a :Microsoft C'ertdfded .Solution Provider and has -74 Microsoft C.ertd, fled Professionals. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 16E10 01 -3)282 Database Experience: DCR is a Microsoft Certified Solution Provider, Oracle Business Alliance Partner and an IBM Partner. DCR has expertise in data warehousing and data modeling large and . complex systems as well as database development using different RDBMS like SQL Server, Oracle and DB2. DCR has 7 Microsoft Certified SO—L Server DBAs. Full Life Cycle Development Experience DCR's team has more than 1000 man years of application development experience. DCR's unified development process, supported by a comprehensive quality management system, shortens the application development timeframe and provides significant business benefits to the customer. Software Development Methodology: DCR's application development methodology follows the cycle that includes project planning, analysis, design, development, quality assurance and final implementation. All the phases go through an initiation process, planning process, controlling process and closing process. Risk management planning is done as a part of the planning process and progress measurement, risk monitoring and control and quality control are done as part of the controlling process. 1.2 WIRELESS APPLICATION PROJECTS DCR's wireless application development projects include database interfaces, mobile messaging, web applications, speech recognition applications and local applications for wireless devices. Below is sampling of recent projects that DCR has been involved in with clients: 1.2.1 Engineering Change Management The client is a large telecommunications company in Florida and has a workflow process for approval and implementation of any engineering change requests in their product (changes could involve changing the manufacturers for different parts or something as simple as the size of the logo on the products). DCR automated the entire workflow process by developing a wireless application that can also be accessed online by the authorized users. The users get all the jobs that are allocated to them on their Palm top and they can review the job details and either approve or put in notes that request for additional information. This application also has an interface to email so-that emails with reminders can be sent. The entire application was developed using WAS', WAIL, ASP with COM and Microsoft SQL Server 7.0 as the database. 3.2.2 Field Service Supply Chain The client is a prime government contractor in Orlando, FL that performs projects for the Department of Defense. They have multiple locations in Orlando and there is department need to dispatch technicians into the field to support their hardware, software as well as engineering equipment. The capability for efficient scheduling of the field technicians is critical to help the company meet its deadlines. Hence, DCR designed and developed a web based application that is accessible by the technicians from Pocket PC and shows them the jobs that they need to complete, based on their areas of expertise. The technicians can update the job status and also request for additional software licenses and hardware parts through the application. The entire system was designed and developed by DCR using ASP on US with SQL Server as the database. DCR is also currently providing maintenance and support (including enhancements) for the application. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 4 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 16E10 01 -3282 1.2.3 Faeffities Management System The client is a financial services company in Florida that buys and manages non - performing loans and mortgages. DCR designed and developed a facilities management system that tracks the allocation of different facilities (e.g. space, telephone, computer, software licenses, laptops, cell phone etc.) when. employees join, move between departments or leave the company. The personnel from different departments get notified through the Palm pilot application when they have a pending task (e.g. set up a telephone and an extension, setup a computer and install certain software etc.). The Palm application was developed by DCR using Visual C++ with SQL Server as the database. User training was provided over a period of 2 weeks and currently DCR is providing ongoing maintenance and application support. 1.2.4 Email over Phone The client is a telecommunications company in Florida and is providing a service by which a customer can register and receive their emails over the Internet, phone or on their wireless device. DCR designed and developed a complete system using ASP, COM and SQL Server along with SpeechWorks with Windows NT, IIS and Exchange server. The system connects to the mail server and converts the mail to the appropriate format based on the device that is accessing it (Pocket PC, Palm or telephone) and delivers the email. For a telephone, the email message is also converted to speech. DCR also provided complete user manuals, online help and other documentation that was required for the application. 1.2.5 rational Account Customer Tracking Software The client is a security systems company in Florida and has a client- server application for tracking the contacts for all their national accounts. DCR migrated the application to web based application that is accessible over a Pocket PC using ASP, COM and SQL Server. The data was migrated from a mainframe database into SQL Server on a scheduled basis and DCR developed batch programs for the data transfer. DCR worked closely with the clients to design the presentation layer and maintained the functionality of the processing layer. The design was done using Rational Rose. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 5 16E10 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY The project is organized to ensure delivery of a timely and quality solution as follows: Project Manager Developer I QA Analyst + Trainer and Technical Writer 01 -32$2 TATLLE T1110 ROLE PROJECT 1000/0 The project manager will be dedicated to the project effort full-time MANAGER during the duration of the project. The Project Manager will be responsible for: Project management and the use of sound project management techniques including work planning, status reporting, issues management, deliverable review and risk management. ® Overall project leadership. ® Overall system and user test planning and coordination ® Acting as the primary point of contact for the County. DEVELOPER 100% The Developer will be allocated to the project on a full time basis and will be involved in design, development and testing phases of the project. Responsibilities include: • Application detailed design and development • Prototype development ® Unit testing and Support for system and user testing QA ANALYST During There will be one QA Analyst allocated to this assignment during testing and the testing and rollout phase. Responsibilities include: rollout a Documentation of test plans and test cases. • System testing and regression testing. • Support the user and acceptance testing. TRARIiER AND During There will be one Trainer and Technical Writer during the rollout TECHNICAL rollout and and training phase. Responsibilities include preparation of training WRITER training manuals, training and user documentation. � PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 6 16E10 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 01 -3232 Each team member will work from DCR's development center in Delray Beach, FL. If necessary, they will travel to the County's office in Naples, FL. 2.2 A COMPLETE RESUME OF EACH TEAM 1l MMBER PROJECT MANAGER REGHU WARRIER Summary of experience A Certified Project Management Professional with over 15 years of experience in consulting and industry focusing on project management, organizational assessments and redesigns for large corporations in high tech, insurance, communications and the retail industries. Areas of expertise Project management Customer relationship management ® Strategic sourcing ® Strategic planning development ® Business process engineering ® Technology management History with DCR: Reghu Warrier has been with DCR for the last 4 years as a Project Manager and has been responsible for developing, managing. and controlling budget for different projects. Technical Disciplines: Operating Systems Windows 2000, CE, NT, 98, 95, PalmOS, Sun Solaris, AIX, HP-UX, MVS, OS/390. Software Microsoft Project, Office Database: SQL Server, DB2, Oracle Case Tools: ERWin, Rational Rose Programming Tools: Visual Basic, ASP, COM, HTA&L, SQL, C, C++, Java Work Experience July 1997 — Present Project Manager, DCR May 1994 — July 1997 Project Manager, Liberty Mutual Insurance Jan 1990 — April 1994 Principal Consultant, IBM Corporation Dec. 1988 —Dec. 1989 System Analyst, Syntel Corporation June 1985 — Oct. 1988 Engineer, Merchant Navy Relevant experience ® For the Florida Department of Law Enforcement, served as a project manager for a three year project to upgrade the law- enforcement computer systems. 'Managed the development of three PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 7 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 16E10 01 -3282 WAP and WML enabled applications for the wireless. Acting as a consultant, he managed a third party vendor to ensure the successful completion of the product, which included the delivery of hardware and development of software. He worked with the sheriffs and police departments, to meet the goals of the Department which included transitioning from dumb terminals to a client server application. For a large telecommunications, managed the development of the workflow system for engineering change management on a Pocket PC, interacted directly with the business users to collect information, implementation of new enterprise systems and consolidation of information sharing between the warehouses. Managed a team of 1 designer and 4 developers and QA analysts for systems that were developed using ASP, COM, HTML with SQL Server 7 as the database. Overall documented improvement in ROI was over 23 %. For a Fortune 500 security services company, converted a national account tracking system from a client - server to a wireless application on a Pocket PC. Managed a team of developers, business analysts and testers. Interacted directly with different business users and prepared specifications based on their input. The results included up to 27% cost savings and improved the efficiency of the sales team. Led an e- business transformation for a large retailer for Latin America. Responsible for improved change management processes thus reducing risk and improved fulfillment tracking. Led the implementation of a new custom fulfillment system that also integrated with carriers and the customs department in Venezuela. Education and Certification Certified Project Management Professional 2 year Diploma in Business Management BS Mechanical Engineering PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 8 16E10 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 01 -3282 QA ANALYST ANIL RAJANALA Summary of experience A Certified CMM Specialist with over 14 years of experience in quality management, strategy and planning of software applications. Areas of expertise • CMM Roadmap • Quality Review ® Quality Management ® Benchmark establishment History with DCR: Anil Rajanala has been with DCR for the last 3 years as the lead member of the QA team. He has been responsible for the quality assurance and quality control for all projects. Technical Disciplines: Operating Systems: Windows 2000, CE, NT, 98, 95, Sun Solaris, Linux. Software Database: DB2, Sybase, SQL Server 7.0, Oracle Test Tools: SQA Team Test, Load Runner Programming Languages: Java, COBOL, CICS, C /C++, HTTML, AIL, SQL, PL/SQL, Shell Scripting Configuration Management: PVCS, C1earCase, Visual Source Safe Work Experience Jan. 1997 — Present QA Analyst, DCR June 1996 — Dec. 1996 Senior Consultant, CMC Aug. 1991 — May 1996 Systems Analyst, Tata Consultancy Services July 1987 — July 1991, Systems Analyst, Larsen c& Toubro Relevant experience ® Created the quality control and quality management plan for a Fortune 500 Security Service company. Developed the quality assurance standards for all web based applications. Developed a V -Model of Verification and Validation that established guidelines for quality assurance of every deliverable and the scope for each phase of the project. ® Developed the standards for system testing, stress testing, performance testing and benefits realization testing. a Over 10 years has been a hands -on test specialist with expertise in defect management, configuration management and revision and build management Education and Certification • BS Computer Engineering. • Microsoft Certified Professional PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 9 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY DEVELOPER CHUCK T. 16E10 01 -3282 Summary of experience Microsoft Certified Solution Developer with over 9 years of experience in wireless application development, web development and database development on the Windows CE and NT platforms. Areas of expertise Wireless Application Development ® Object Oriented Programming Database Development History with DCR: Chuck has been with DCR for the last 2 years as a senior programmer /analyst for wireless development projects using n -tier distributed architecture. Technical Disciplines: Operating Systems Windows CE, PalmOS, Windows 2000, NT, 98, 95, HP -UK. Software Database: SQL Server 7.0 Case Tools:, ERWin, Rational Rose Programming Languages: ASP, COM/DCOM, C, C++, IHTYtL, WML, SQL Transaction Server: MTS Methodologies: UML, Jacobson's Use Case, Booch, Yourdon Configuration Management: Visual Source Safe Work Experience Oct. 1999 — Present Senior System Analyst, DCR Jan. 1995 — Aug. 1999 Systems Programmer, Siemens Telecom Networks Dec. 1992 — Dec. 1994 Programmer, Advanced Promotions Technologies Relevant experience For a large telecommunication company, developed applications for automating their engineering change management process. Designed and developed the application for a Pocket PC running Windows CE using ASP, COM and HTML with SQL Server. Designed the entire user interface and tested it on the PocketPC. Developed the modules for database transactions. Used Jacobson's method for Use Case modeling. For a large government prime contractor, developed an application to schedule the field service technicians for solving hardware and software issues. The application was developed using a Windows emulator for the Pocket PC and later deployed on a Pocket PC. Was responsible for developing all the pages using ASP and HT J-. Used COM and 1NfTS for all business rules and database interactions. Developed the stored procedures in SQL Server to encapsulate all the transactions. Was also responsible for detailed design documentation and creation of unit test plans and test cases. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 10 16E10 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 01 -3282 ® Developed a franchise management application for a large franchiser of signs that has an online application for the franchisers to update their information. Used ASP and HTML for the GUI and the online application with SQL Server as the database. Developed an online portal that provided information about cricket in the US. This was developed as an n -tier application with XML, ASP and SQL Server and feeds from other web sites. ® Designed and developed a wireless application for a large security services company in Florida that tracks contact information for their National Accounts. The application was developed for the Windows CE platform. Developed COM components to handle all the business rules and prototyped the GUI after interacting with the end user. Developed batch programs to migrate the data from the source (which is a mainframe database) to the SQL Server. Education and Certification 9 Microsoft Certified Solution Developer. ® BS Mathematics and Computer Science with specialization in databases PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 11 16E10 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 01 -3282 3. REFERENCES DCR brings solid client references to attest to its past performance: Lockheed Martin Information Systems 12506 Lake Underhill Rd., Orlando, FL Ashok Kumar, (407)306 -3926 DCR designed and developed a wireless application for scheduling the field technicians to service hardware equipment for their various locations in Orlando. The application was developed in October, 2000 and there were 4 developers, 1 business analyst and a project manager in the team. DCR still has a maintenance contract for this application. Motorola Inc. 1500 Gateway Blvd., Boynton Beach, FL Rajesh Tulsyani, (561)739 -2979 DCR designed and developed a wireless application to- automate the workflow procedures for their engineering change management. This application shortened the review and approval cycle for new engineering parts by 12 %. The application was developed in August 1999 and DCR still has a maintenance contract for it. The team consisted of one project manager with two developers and one QA Analyst. Ocwen Financial Corp. 1335 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd., West Pahn Beach, FL Brian Knowles, (561)441 -2191 DCR designed and developed a facilities management system for Ocwen, that allowed the different departments to manage the facilities (space, telephone, computers and laptops) over their different locations, order additional equipment from suppliers if necessary and automate the workflow for facilities management during hiring, termination or transfer or employees. The application was developed in May 1999 and there was one project manager with two developers and one QA Analyst for this project. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 12 16E10 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 01 -3282 FIN 2WE 401 STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM The Collier County building inspectors currently receive their daily schedules from hard copies of inspection sheets. After completing the inspections, they update the inspection sheets and submit their inspection notes for data entry. The data is stored in a SQL Server database and is available for the contractors either through the web site or through phone messages. The inspectors need to travel to the County twice in a day(once in the morning and once in the afternoon) and call in several times to key in the inspection results via telephonic codes. Morning Visit Get inspection sheets. Get inspection history. Pick up county trucks. Ai'ternooni Visit Submit inspection notes. Return phone calls. Consult with superiors. Return county trucks. The County needs to reduce the time that the inspectors spend on travel and administrative tasks by streamlining the scheduling and administrative tasks. This can be done by providing an online web based application that will be available through a Pocket PC with an Internet connection that allows the inspectors to receive their schedule and update the inspection status and notes. 4.2 SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT -- DCR will satisfy the following technical requirements as part of this application: Automatic Scheduling: DCR will implement a scheduling algorithm that will automatically generate schedules for each inspector based on the locations so that inspectors do not have to travel too far from one scheduled inspection to another. Once an automated schedule is created, the administrator will also be able to review the inspection schedule and make changes. Web Based Application: DCR will design and develop the entire application as a web based application which will be formatted for the Pocket PC as well as a desktop PC. The web application will interface with the SQL Server 7.0 database. s Schedule Extraction: The application will allow the inspectors to extract their daily schedules from the database based on their user id and password. • Online (inspection Sheet: DCR will design and develop an online inspection sheet where the PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 13 16E10 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 01 -3282 inspectors will be able to review the inspection history and update the status, the rejection codes and notes. ® Inspection fflstoay: The inspectors will be able to review the inspection history for the inspections that they have scheduled. ® Daily Inspection Retention: The inspection data for the daily schedule will be available for the inspectors to reference until it has been uploaded. Data Delivery: The inspectors will be able to update the County's central SQL Server 7.0 database repository from the application. ® Hosting: The entire application will be hosted at Collier County on its internal servers. ® Security: The web application will be secure so that inspectors will be able to view and update only their own scheduled inspections. Only administrators will be able to review and change the schedules. ® Administrative Interface: The administrators for the application will be able to .add or Update Inspectors, Modify or Add Inspection Schedules and Review Completed Inspection Sheets. The detailed functionality will be discussed with the County. ® Online Help: The application will have online help for the inspectors. DCR has designed a prototype for the user interface for the application for the Pocket PC. This prototype is based on DCR's understanding of the application only. The prototype has been hosted on http://www.der-inc.com/collier. The user interface will be modified based on input from the County. The entire application will be developed using ASP, COM and H TWL with IrS as the web server and SQL Server as the database. DCR's project approach provides a framework for the delivery process and a "work breakdown structure" that segments the project into manageable work phases with clearly defined deliverables. This approach is based on experience with delivering similar systems and processes for similar clients. DCR's project approach places emphasis on application prototyping and iterative prototype review to ,canalize the overall solution design. Solution development and testing is also an iterative process that requires active user participation. The solution will undergo rigorous validation and acceptance testing by all user groups. User approval and sign -off is required prior to releasing the system for pilot testing. Our approach places emphasis on "pilot" deployment to provide user interaction well in advance of final deployment. This approach ensures user involvement in the development process and ultimately ensures a system that is well accepted by the users and meets business requirements. The entire project will be divided into phases and there will be concrete deliverables for each phase. The work breakdown structure for each phase is given below: PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 14 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 16E10 01 -3282 fey Tasks � Key Phases Deliverables Figure 1 Development Approach Develop project plan. P 04ECT PLANNING Project Plan Analyze database. Gather detailed * �s ie Requirements Document tE�� ,�� ; requirements._�Sk ; Create GUI prototype. Develop architecture.: �r Design Document P �, Document detailed design. t NMI Setup development V — environment. S ystem test plans Develop application. k�Bw m Unit tested Complete unit testing. a application Prepare system test plans. �. ... app Perform system testing. Install application. Rollout document Train users for user tNr N� A e Complete tested testing. a. .:� application and Perform user acceptance documentation testing Post installation Training Rollout to production �� I f ,� � ;�-� . � Complete deployed . a F 4 application PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 15 16E10 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 01 -3282 403 INTERFACE TO COUNTY'S BUSINESS SYSTEMS As discussed in the Software Development section, the application will interface with the County's SQL Server database. The data that is input into the SQL Server database for inspections will be retrieved in the application and when the inspector makes an update, it will update the data in the SQL Server database. The inspection schedule will be generated automatically on a scheduled basis. There will be an administrative interface for the administrators to modify the schedule manually if necessary. 404 TIMELINE The high -level project timeline is shown below. It assumes that the project will start on November 1, 2001 The start date will coincide with the County's Purchase Order date. There is an overlap between phases as some of the tasks in a phase can be started without waiting for deliverables from a previous phase. The estimate for the level of effort for each phase is given below: PHASE DELIVERABLES LES EFFORT (person days) MILESTONE DATE Planning Project Plan 2 Nov. 5, 2001 Needs Analysis Requirements Document GUI Prototype 5 Nov. 12, 2001 Design Design Document b Nov. 19, 2001 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 16 16E10 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 01 -3282 Development Complete application 15 Nov. 2S, 2001 Test plans Quality Assurance Complete tested application 11 Dec. 7, 2001 User testing Implementation Training 10 Dec. 19, 2001 Rollout Based on the recommended solution, the County inspectors will need Pocket PCs with a browser and Internet connection. DCR recommends the following hardware (specifications can be modified after discussions with the County): COMPAQ iPAQ H635 Pocket PC, 32 MB RAM, lb MB .ROM, 240x320 resolution. Windows CE and Pocket Internet Explorer are preinstalled. 4.6 TRAINING DCR will provide training to the end users and administrators. The following training will be provided: ® End User training with training manuals: The end user training will be organized into groups of different levels. Training will be provided about the application, use of Pocket PC, Internet and also some trouble shooting. Training manuals will be provided. ® Administrator Training: The administrators will be trained for the application usage, administrative features and trouble shooting. Training Manuals will be provided to the administrators. There will be four -hour training sessions scheduled for 6 different days for the end users. There will be two -hour training sessions schedules for 2 different days for the administrators. 4.7 TECHNICAL SUPPORT DCR will allocate a technical support team for application maintenance and support. The following cycle will be followed for Technical Support: PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 17 16E10 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 01 -3282 Issue Acceptance Level I Help Escaltd' Level II Help Toll Free Number Desk ae Desk Web Based Application Resolved Resolve Schedule Issue !!IResolved Onsite Maintenance Issue Acceptance: DCR will provide a tall free number for technical support as well as a web basest application for the issues to be entered. ® Level I Help Desk: The Level I Help Desk will try to answer and resolve all technical support issues. If the issue cannot be resolved or it needs application enhancement, it will get escalated to Level II Help Desk. ® Level II Help Desk: The Level H Help Desk will resolve the issue or if enhancements are required, it will make the changes in the application. If the enhancements need onsite work at the County, the Level II Help Desk will schedule an onsite visit. ® Onsite Maintenance: Onsite Maintenance will be scheduled for as early as tl :e next business clay. Onsite maintenance might be required if production data needs to be accessed or new versions of the application need to be uploaded. ® Issue Closure: An issue is closed if it has been resolved satisfactorily. ACCESS TO COUNTY SERVERS: DCR understands that the County might have policies that might restrict access to County's servers. It is willing to work with the County's Departments for getting access to the servers and databases for providing technical support, making modifications to the application or running SQL queries. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 1$ 16E10 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 01 -3282 5. FEE PROPOSAL DCR proposes a fixed price of $20,0$5 for the entire project. The entire price has been calculated as follows: PHASE HOURS RATE 'TO'T'AL Project Planning 15 65 $975 Analysis 26 65 $1690 Design 28 65 $1820 Development 100 65 $6500 Quality Assurance 60 65 $3900 Implementation & Training 80 65 $5200 The hourly rate for support will be $65 per hour. DCR will bill only for actual hours worked during support. 6. ;� s _ q _� - ` INFORMATION "F _ r DCR has not been involved in any litigation. The following documents have been attached: ® Proposer qualification form. ® Insurance requirements certification ® Proposer's checklist ® Proposer Declaration Statement. PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 19 16E10 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 01 -3282 7. APPEND - WEB PAGES FOR THE APPLICATION A sample user interface has been designed and hosted at lam: / /www.der- acne- com/collier. Given below are some screen shots from the pages. http://208.60.22.1 B /cogier/ COUNTY GOVERNZvIENT This is a demo for pocket PC version of the inspection management system. Pages has been formatted for the pocket PC only. The actual application will be formatted for the pocket PC as well as the desktop PC. We put in the fields as per our understanding. the actual screens will be designed based on input from collier county. Click Her-, 1br demo of Pecfloet PC version. Click H ere for demo of Adnd-n version. 3 DUA COMPUTER RESOURCES INC. 8 ainmeruhtm PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 20 16E10 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY 01-3282 hWmMM22. Inspector Lis "WIMER 200 QM884902nd!VE 5dl �123-123�40MWDIIMI 00,02-R 201=326"- 490 2nd AVE 561-123-1237 09M1/2001 MR, PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 21 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY /1208.60.22.18icaMeriir►spedbnsheeLMm Daily Inspector Sheet PervdtU 2090033283 Issue Date 0910112001 Location. 490 2nd AVE Phone 561-123-1234 Dhdsion 699 Golden Estate Value 92000 Des :!&qx CBS RESIDENCE 200 AMPS RESULT 90 RESULT DATE 0510912001 Name CALI, INC Phone 561-123-1234 Contact Rob DEA CALI, INC Cert.No. 100109 Directions Take 195 Exit 45 Status PASSED Rejection 1BPiLG�-L0r- iqbM Codes Notes Inspection history 20-1 PB 90 0310I=1 Spencer C agaurly ri 205 ST 90 WiDl=l Hosso–C 16E10 01-3282 History Details of Permit# 20000033288 RW 201 CLASS PB DESCRUMON PLUMBING TUB TEST REQUE57DAII 89n0r401 RESULT 90 RESULT DATE 0510912001 EMECTOR SPENCER -C FM PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 22 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY F http: //208.6Q 2218 /coder /admHogin.htm TTsemame: admin .__._..._ Password pull 16E10 01 -3282 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 23 PROPOSAL FOR COLLIER COUNTY F8e edit dew:_. Fgvottte: :j _ j 88c1c For lv3rd 5� 5 �' effes#t y" f1b1t18r i ,. j A� diess: ] http:/ /208.60.2218 /collier /admin.htm { COLLIER COUNTY GOVER.NAUNT This is the main page of the AdminModule of the Inspection Management System. Using this interface, the administrators can review the inspection schedule and make changes if necessary and add/remove inspectors. The details for this module will be Finalized after discussions with the County. f� http:// 208. 60. 22. 18icollierlinsper-tionschedUe.htm COLLIER COUNT' GOVERNMENT 16E10 page, the administrator will be able to review the deriy schedule by date. (This is ,tomatic schedule thathas been generatedbythe system). If they feel that this to be changed (e.g. if an inspector takes a day off or some other reason), they can odifythe schedule. 01 -3282 PROPRIETARY INFORMATION OF DCR, 2001 24 RFP No. 00 -3 CONTRACT PROPOSAL Page 19 16E10 FROM: DUA COMPUTER RESOURCES INC, DATE DUE: October 5, 2001 ED 3 :00 PM Board of County Commissioners Collier County Government Center Naples, Florida 34112 RE: RFP NO. 01 -3282 "'Wireless Applications for Community Development and Environmental Services" Dear Commissioners: The undersigned, as Proposer hereby declares that he has examined the Scope of Services, and informed himself fully in regard to all conditions pertaining to the work to be done. The Proposer further declares that the only persons, company or parties interested in this Proposal or the Contract to be entered into as principals are named herein; that the Proposal is made without connection with any other person, company or companies making a Proposal; and it is in all respects fail and in good faith, without collusion or fraud. The services to be furnished by us shall be performed in accordance with the requirements of the Request for Proposal #01 -3282 as issued by Collier County on September 14, 2001. The undersigned do agree that should this Proposal be accepted, to execute the form of contract and present the same to the County Purchasing Director for approval within fifteen (15) days after being notified of the awarding of this contract. The undersigned do further agree that failure to execute and deliver said forms of contract within fifteen (15) days will result in damages to the County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto subscribed our names on this 26 day September , 2001 in the County of Palm Beach, in the State of FL . Dua Computer Resources Inc. Firm's Complete Legal Name Check one of the following: ❑ Sole Proprietorship ® Corporation or P.A. State of Florida ❑ Limited Partnership ❑ General Partnership Phone No. 561 -276 -6838 FAX No. 561 - 276 -8058 100 E.Linton Blvd. , Suite 203A Address Delray Beach, FL -33483 _ City, State, Zip BY: Ammu Warned Typed and WriftEn-15ignaturer President Title PROPOSERS QUALIFICATION FORM 16E10 LIST MAJOR WORK PRESENTLY !UNDER CONTRACT: % Completed Proiect Contract Amount 24% Search Engine Development $ 69,000 65% Fax Over Email Wireless Application $ 3',000 32% EMI — Billing Application $26,000 LIST CURRENT PROJECTS ON WHICH YOUR FIRM IS THE CANDIDATE FOR AWARD: Minority Vendor Database, Georgia Department of Administrative Services SELIS Migration, US Department of Agriculture SBE /Client Server Analysts, IL State Board of Education Staff Augmentation Contract, South FL Water Management District IT Services, Martin County Have you, at any time, failed to complete a project? ®°des ❑ No (If the answer is yes, submit details on separate sheet. REFERENCES: Bank(s) Maintaining Account(s): Bank of America, Line MacLeod, 561 -838 -5089 Pursuant to information for prospective bidders /proposers for the above- mentioned proposed project, the undersigned is submitting the information as required with the understanding that it is only to assist in determining the qualifications of the organization to perform the type and magnitude of work intended, and further, guarantee the truth and accuracy of all statements herein made. We will accept your determination of qualifications without prejudice. Name of Organization: Dua Computer resources Inc. By: Ammu Warrier:.1— Title: P Attested By:'y�l�' Title: Date: f - - T1 RFP No. 00 -3 Collier County Florida Insurance Requirements RFP #01-3282 INSURANCE TYPE REQUIRED LIMITS X 1. Workers' Compensation X 2. Commercial General Liability (Occurrence Form) patterned after the 1005 I.S.O. form with no limiting endorsements Page lb 16E10 Statutory Limits of Florida Statutes, Chapter 440 and all Federal Government Statutory Limits and Requirements. Bodily Iniury & Property Damage $1,000,000 Single Limit Per Occurrence X 3. Indemnification: The Consultant, in consideration of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is acknowledged through the signing of this document, shall protect, defend, indemnify and hold Collier County and its officers, employees and agents harmless from and against any and al losses, penalties, damages, professional fees, including attorney fees and all costs of litigation and judgments arising out of any willful misconduct or negligent act, error or omission of the Consultant, its subconsultants, agents or employees, arising out of or incidental to the performance of this contract or work performed thereunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against the County by any employee of the named Consultant, any subconsuitant, subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them. This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of Collier County. 4. Automobile Liability OwnedJNon- owned /Hired Automobile Included X 5. Other Insurance as indicated below: $ Each Occurrence a) Professional Liability $500,000 Per Occurrence The Consultant shall be solely responsible to parties with whom it shall deal in carrying out the terms of this agreement and shall hold the County harmless against all claims arising from the negligent acts, errors, or omissions of consultant by third parties. 02/21/2002 16:49 STIRLING INSURANCE 4 2768058 NO.975 D01 c CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE 16E10 The company indicated below certifies that the insurance afforded by the policy or policies numbered and described below is in force as of the effective date of this certificate. This Certificate of Insurance does not amend, extend, or otherwise alter the Terms and Conditions of Insurance coverage contained in any Policy numbered and described below, CERTIFICATE HOLDER: INSURED: COLLIER COUNTY DUA COMPUTER RESOURCES, INC. 3301 E TAMIAMI TRAIL 100 E LINTON BLVD NAPLES, FL 341.12 SUITE 203A DELRAY BCACH, FL 33493 I I POLICY NUMBER I POLICY I POLICY I LIMITS OF LIABILITY TYPE OF INSURANCE 1 & ISSUING CO. JEFF, OATS IEXP, DATE ( ( *LIMITS AT INCEPTION) 1 l LIABILITY 177 -PR- 447236 -3001 1 01 -18 -02 1 01 -18 -03 I [X] Liability and I NATIONWIDE I I I I Any One Occurrence.....,,, s 2,000,000 I Medical Expanse I MUTUAL I ( I [XI Personal and I INSURANCE CO. I ( 1 I Any One Person /Org S 2.000,000 1 I Advertising Injury) [XI Medical Expenses 1 I ANY ONE PERSON .,,,, g 5.000 J I [XI Fire Legal I I I I Any One Fire or Explosion S 100,000 Liability I I I General Aggregate* ....... S 2,000,000 I I C ] Other Liability I Prod /Comp Ops Aggregate* , s 2,000.000 J I AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY 177 -p 8447236 -3001 1 01 -18 -02 1 01.18.03 I 1 [X] BUSINESS AUTO i NATIONWIDE I I 1 Bodily Injury MUTUAL I I (Each Person) .......... s I [ I Owned I INSURANCE CO. I Each ( I (Each Accident) ........ s CX] Hired I I Property Damage 1 [XI Non -Owned I I I (Each Accident) ........ S I I I 1 Combined Single Limit .... a 1,000,000 EXCESS LIABILITY 177 -CU- 447236.3002 101 -18 -02 ( 01 -18 -03 I I Each Occurrence .......... S 3.000,000 � I Nationwide I I I Prod /Comp Ops /Disease [XI Umbrella Form I 1 Insurance Co. 1 I I Aggregate* ,,,,, ••.•..•. $ 3,000.000 I C Workers' 1 I 1 STATUTORY LIMITS I I I BODILY INJURY /ACCIDENT I Compensation ( j I i .. . Bodily Injury by Disease"' isease 1 I and I I I I EACH EMPLOYEE ,....,,,,, $ I C] Employers' � 1 I 1 Bodily Injury by Disease Liability I I I I I POLICY LIMIT ........... S BUSINESS AUTO COVERAGE IS I DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS /LOCATIONS INCLUDED IN BLANKET PROTECTOR VEHICLES /RESTRICTIONS /SPECIAL ITEMS POLICY. Effective bate of Certificate: 01- 18-2002 Authorized Representative: TERRY SGAMMATO Oate Certificate Issued: 02.21 -2002 Countersigned at: 2290 NW Boca Raton Blvd#6 Life /Health /Home /Car /Bsn. 02/19/2002 29:49 FAX 18772871315 THE HARTFORD [a 001 - - - a.mo® — 16E10 A— Only - EA. AccidenL- Policy affirctive Date: Mz T$E ACORD CERTXFICATE OF LIAB RWORD ILITY INSURANCE Prod ucer February 20, 2002 210705 Paychex Ietetcomtn Tali CETTIFICATE IS 7 uED A trL►1TER Os INNORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO The Hartford RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDlCR THIS CERTIFICATE 308 Farmington Avenue DOES NOT AMEND, WaTNS OR ALTER THE COVXRAGE Faeningmn, CT AFFORDED 4Y TIHE FOLICl6S BELOW. 06032 -1913 DUA C UA COMPUTER RESOURCE INC Insurers ordi ra as Covege DBA IasurerA: Hartford Urub rwriwrs rnsuranee Co 100 E LOVTON B [.VD STE 203 A bnurer Bt DELRAY BEACI•r, PL 1", C: 33483 F=561 -27r so5B Insurer D; Insurer E: POLICIES OF INSURANCE LIS sD BEL W HAVE B ISSUED TOT INS N ABO li FOR Tait POLI v PERI INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIRWENT, TERM V P OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACTOR OTHER DOCUMENT RESPECT TO WMCH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY OT Willi PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE ACT R 8Y THE POLICIES DESCRWr:D HERMN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUQD By PAID CLAIMS. OF SUCH POL ICIES. AGGREGATE LIMIT3 General Liability insurer. Commercial f3eneral L'u• bility, Lim[u Claims Madc: Fnh Occnrrracc:, S Occur: Fire Damage (any one fine); g Policy Number. Med Expense (may oneperaoto): $ Poli E$octi cy ve Dam: Personal & Adv Liability: $ Policy Expire Daw: GeaetaI Aggregate: $0.00 General Aggregate LimirApplies Per: Products � Con Comp/Op Agg: $0.00 Policy; Project: LOC: 7a21moblle Liabiuty Insurer. Amy Aub: Llwib All Owned Amos: Cotnb 5ia c Limi ea secident ; $ ) Scheduled Autos: Bom Jn Y lruy(Porperson): $ Hired Auto& a0l �jury(Pcr Aceidcur): $ Non Owned Atuns: PmPerty Dam ge(Pcr Accidcut): $ Policy Number; Policy Effecive Date: Any Auto: - - - a.mo® — Policy Numbcr. A— Only - EA. AccidenL- Policy affirctive Date: Odwf Tban Auto Only: Policy Capitation Da= EA Accmdcnt: S Aggregate; $ Extxss Liability aMade: Insurer. Limlm Clain Bch Occurrence: S Deductible: Aggregate: g Retortion: $ PolicyNumber. Policy Effective Date: & Employer'x Liability -- - "MAIN WC Statutory Limits: x Policy Number. Other. 76WE OX4653 E.L. Each Accident S t 00,000 Policy Effective Dam: 6 -AUG41 EL Disca9e - EA Er to Policy Expiration Date: 6- AUG -02 np Yet+ $1001000 Deseription o1 operadoos /bcatfons /veblcIealetcclusions added B Die - Policy LitttiC $ 500,000 BUS OF INSD: COMPUTER CONSULTING by ondorscmenvspeeial Provisions: A7' N- Collier County 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Fat: Sbouid any of the above described policies be cauceted be bre the cap"gon date thereof,, ;he issuiug insurce Win endeavor to mail 10 days wriacu notice to the cenig-te bolder namcd to the ldfk but failure to do so shall impale no obligation or liability Of sny kind upon die inaruer, its agent or rcpneenmdvf. Mz RFP No. 00 -3 THIS SHEET MIDST BE SIGNED EY VENDOR Board of County Commissioners Collier County, Florida Purchasing Department PROPOSERS CHECK LIST Page 18 16E10 I M P ® R T A N T: Please read carefully, sign in the spaces indicated and return with your RFP proposal. Proposer should check off each of the following items as the necessary action is completed: i. The RFP has been signed. 2. All required submittals have been included. 3. Any required drawings, descriptive literature, etc. have been included. 4. Any addenda have been signed and included. 5. The mailing envelope has been addressed to: Purchasing Director Collier County Government Center Purchasing Building 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 s. The mailing envelope must be sealed and marked with: • RFP Number; • RFP Title; • Opening Date 7. The RFP will be mailed or delivered in time to be received no later than the specified opening date and time. (Otherwise RFP cannot be considered.) ALL COURIER DELIVERED BIDS /RFP'S MUST HAVE THE SID /RFP NUMBER AND TITLE ON THE OUTSIDE OF THE COURIE=R PACKET. Dua Computer Resources Inc. Company Name President \5 " Signature & Title 09-27 -2001 Date 16ElO Exhibit `a'" 16E10 It is further clarified that the contractor will develop and employ a thick client software solution for the Pocket PC's that will store a minimum of one (Z) day's data input by County Permit Inspectors. This application should automatically detect a wireless signal when it is available and then synchronize with the database. This should include the down loading of the inspector's data and uploading any updates to their scheduled work, including changes in job status or history. In addition to this, the inspector should also have the option to synchronize the data through a standard Internet connection or network connection with the database server. 0 16ElO Exhibit "B"" 16E10 Exhibit "B" Contractor shall develop and deliver 'to County, as both object code and source code, the software described in this Agreement, together with all documentation customarily provided with such type of product, including in any event all manuals and other documentation that is necessary or reasonably desirable for County to identify the software, understand its functionality and application, and operate it for its intended use ( "Documentation "), in such form and content as is reasonably acceptable to the County. The duties of Contractor under this Agreement shall be performed as work for hire. With the exception of any already existing third party software that Contractor identifies in writing to County prior to delivery, County shall be the sole owner of all software (including both object code and source code), Documentation, reports and other deliverables and materials that Contractor provides, and all work product that Contractor generates, in the course of performance under this Agreement (all together, "Software "), and County shall possess all copyrights, all other intellectual property rights and all other rights in the Software, including but not limited to all economic rights, all rights of possession, reproduction and transfer, and all rights of modification. Contractor shall not receive or retain any license or other rights in the Software, whether arising from the process of creation or otherwise, and if any such right were deemed to arise, Contractor hereby waives it unconditionally, and if it cannot be waived, Contractor hereby assigns it to County. Contractor agrees to cooperate with any request by the County at any time to confirm such waiver and /or assignment in a separate writing. Contractor shall not permit any of its employees or contractors to obtain or retain any rights in the Software, and shall indemnify and defend County against the assertion of any such right by Contractor, its employees or contractors. 10 Exhiblat "C' 16E10 11 Exhibit "C" Off-14-NUM 16E10 POSI'I10— RATE per hour Programmer/ Analyst I $65 QA Analyst $65 Business Analyst $65 The above Fee Schedule shall apply to all services performed under this Agreement, including, but not limited to the following: 1. Project Planning 2. Analysis 3. Design 4. Development 5. Quality Assurance 6. Implementation 7. Training S. Support (Billing is only for actual hours worked during support) 12 16F 1 MEMORANDUM Date: February 27, 2002 To: Linda Swisher Ochopee Fire Control From: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Resolution 2002 -121 and Disaster Relief Funding Agreement Between Community Affairs and the Ochopee Fire & Rescue Control District Enclosed please find a certified copy of the above referenced documents, approved by the Board of County Commissioners on February 26, 2002 (Agenda Item #16F1). If you should have any questions, please contact me at 774 -8406. Thank you. Enclosure 16F 1 RESOLUTION NO. 02 - 121 RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPROVING THE DISASTER RELIEF FUNDING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS AND THE OCHOPEE FIRE & RESCUE CONTROL DISTRICT WHEREAS, the State of Florida experienced Tropical Storm Gabrielle in September, 2001; and WHEREAS, the President of the United States, through the Federal Emergency Management Agency, has made funds available for disaster relief; and WHEREAS, eleven Florida counties, including Collier County, have been included in the emergency declaration FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL as a result of Tropical Storm Gabrielle on September 13 & 14, 2001; and WHEREAS, Ochopee Fire & Rescue Control District has incurred disaster related costs as the result of Tropical Storm Gabrielle; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that the Disaster Relief Funding Agreement attached as "Exhibit A" is hereby adopted. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote in favor of adoption this Ae.;O& day of , 2002. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Jam . Coletta, Chairman i ATTtES° Dwight E. Brock, Clerk Bey-"'' >�.,Z�GsN•.�/ (Deputy Clerk) Attest at to Chairman's stg►atwe Miy. Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Milo �I�o I OF • _' • Attorney 16F 1 Florida Department of Community Affairs Contract No. 02- RM- *2- 09 -21 -20 -010 DISASTER RELIEF FUNDING AGREEMENT This Agreement is between the State of Florida, Department of Community Affairs (the "Grantee ") and, Ochopee Fire Control District (the "Subgrantee "). This Agreement is based on the existence of the following conditions: Tropical Storm Gabrielle had a devastating impact upon the State of Florida. The severity of the damage and losses resulted in a declaration of emergency by the Governor in Executive Order 01 -268. In consequence of Tropical Storm Gabrielle, the President of the United States declared Tropical Storm Gabrielle a major disaster in the following counties: Charlotte, Collier, DeSoto, Flagler, Manatee, Putnam, Sarasota, St. Johns, Hardee, Highlands, and Lee. The Public Assistance Program was made a:►ailable to eligible applicants in the counties of Charlotte, Collier, DeSoto, Flagler, Manatee, Putnam, Sarasota, St. Johns, Hardee, Highlands, and Lee. The Agreement between the State of Florida and the Federal Emergency Management Agency governing the use of such funds re- quires the State to share the costs eligible for federal financial assistance, and the State has undertaken to share tiiose costs with its Subgrantees. A Budget Amendment has been prepared and is being considered to provide for the necessary funds and authority for this event. 1 16F 1 Under the Emergency Management Act, as amended, the Department has authority to administer federal financial assistance from the Agency consequent to a presidential declaration of disaster. Based upon the existence of the foregoing conditions, the parties agree to the following: ARTICLE I. Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall have the following meanings unless another meaning is specified elsewhere: A. "Eligible activities" are those activities authorized in the FEMA -State Agreement, and in the Robert T. Stafford Disaster Relief and Emergency Assistance Act, Public Law 93 -288, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 5121 -5201; 44 C.F.R. Part 206; and applicable policies of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. B. "FEMA -State Agreement" is the agreement of October 4, 2001 between the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the e State of Florida, for Disaster No. FEMA- 1393- DR -FL. ARTICLE II. APPLICABLE Law. The parties agree to all the conditions, obligations, and duties imposed by the FEMA -State Agreement and all applicable state and federal legal requirements including, without any limitation on the generality of the fore- going, the requirements of 44 C.F.R. Parts 13 and 206, and the policies of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. ARTICLE III. FUNDING and INSURANCE. Grantee shall provide funds to the Subgrantee for eligible activities for the projects approved by the Grantee and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, as specified in the approved Project Worksheets. Page 2 2 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16F 1 Allowable costs shall be determined in accordance with 44 C.F.R. Parts 13 and 206. A. The approved Project Worksheets shall be transmitted to Subgrantee, and shall state the cumulative funding allowed, the scope of the eligible project, and the costs eligible under this Agreement. Project Worksheets may obligate or deobl -igate funding, thereby amending the total amount of funding. The approved Project Worksheets shall document the total eligible costs and the total federal share of those costs, which shall be seventy -five (75) percent of all eligible costs. Contingent upon an appropriation by the Florida Legislature, the Grantee agrees to provide one -half of any non - Federal share for local government and private non - profit Subgrantees. As a condition of receipt of the funding, and contingent upon an appropriation by the Florida Legislature where required, the Subgrantee similarly agrees to provide any non - Federal share not paid by the Grantee. B. As a condition to funding under this Agreement, the Subrantee agrees that the Grantee may withhold funds otherwise payable to Subgrantee from any disbursement to Grantee upon a determination by Grantee or Federal Emergency Management Agency that funds exceeding the eligible costs have been disbursed to Subgrantee pursuant to this Agreement or any other funding agreement administered by Grantee. C. As a further condition to funding under this Agreement, the Subgrantee agrees to procure insurance sufficient for the type or types of hazards for which the disaster was declared to cover Page 3 3 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16F any and all projects to be funded under this Agreement where insurance is available and reasonable. Subgrantee shall provide Grantee with a certificate of such insurance as a condition to funding under this Agreement. ARTICLE IV. DUPLICATION OF BENEFITS PROHIBITION. Subgrantee may not receive funding under this Agreement to pay-for damage covered by insurance, nor may Subgrantee receive any other duplicate benefits under this Agreement. A. Subgrantee shall without delay advise Grantee of any insurance coverage for the damage identified on the applicable Project Worksheets and of any entitlement to compensation or indemnification from such insurance. Subgrantee shall reimburse Grantee without delay for any duplicate benefits Subgrantee may receive from any other source for any damage identified on the applicable Project Worksheets for which Subgrantee has received payment from Grantee, to the extent of any such duplication. B. In the event that Grantee should determine that Subgrantee has received duplicate benefits, by its execution of this Agreement the Subgrantee gives Grantee or the Comptroller of the State of Florida the authority to set off the sum of any such duplicate benefits by withholding it from any other funds otherwise due and owing to Subgrantee. ARTICLE V. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING AND PERMITTING LAWS. Subgrantee shall be responsible for the implementation and completion of the approved projects described in the Project Worksheets in a manner acceptable to Grantee, and Page 4 4 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 1 16F 1 in accordance with applicable legal requirements. The contract documents for any project undertaken by Subgrantee, and any land use permitted by or engaged in by Subgrantee, shall be consistent with the local government Comprehensive Plan. Subgrantee shall ensure that any development or development order complies with all applicable planning, permitting and building requirements. Subgrantee shall engage such competent engineering, building, and other technical and professional assistance at all project sites as may be needed to ensure that the project complies with the contract documents. ARTICLE VI. Required Documentation, Reviews, and Inspections. Subgrantee shall create and maintain documentation of work performed and costs incurred on each project identified in a Project Worksheet sufficient to permit a formal audit comporting with ordinary, customary and prudent public accounting requirements. Upon the failure of Subgrantee to create and maintain such documentation, Grantee may terminate further funding under this Agreement, and Subgrantee shall reimburse to Grantee all payments disbursed earlier to Subgrantee, together with any and all accrued interest. A. Subgrantee shall submit the following documentation for Large Projects (the Small Project threshold for this declaration is $50,600.00): 1. A Request for Advance or Reimbursement conforming to the sample attached to this Agreement as Attachment A; 2. A Summary of Documentation Form conforming to the sample Page 5 5 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16F attached to this Agreement as Attachment B, which shall be supported by original documents such as contract documents, invoices, purchase orders, change orders and the like; 3. A request for final inspection; 4. A signed Project Listing upon the completion of all projects; and 5. The Project Listing and Certification specified by Paragraph B of this Article. B. For all projects, Subgrantee shall state on the Project Listing and Certification that all work was performed in accordance with this Agreement and the requirements in each Project Worksheet, and shall state the date of completion. C. Grantee will inspect Small Projects by random selection, and will conduct the final inspections on Large Projects, to, ensure that all work has been performed within the scope of work specified on the Project Worksheets. Costs not within the approved scope of work shall not be reimbursed. ARTICLE VII. Cost Sharing. The federal share of the eligible costs specified in the Project Worksheets under this Agreement shall be seventy -five (75) percent of such costs and the nonfederal share shall be twenty -five (25) percent. As a condition of funding under this Agreement, the Grantee shall pay fifty (50) percent of the nonfederal share and Subgrantee shall pay the remaining fifty (50) percent. Payment of all or a specified portion of the nonfederal share of such costs is contingent upon an appropriation defining the apportionment of the Page 6 6 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 1 II 16f nonfederal share. Administrative costs in addition to the Project Worksheets that are otherwise eligible under 44 C.F.R. Part 206 and do not require matching funds will also be funded by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. ARTICLE VIII. Payment of Costs Grantee shall disburse the eligible costs to Subgrantee in accordance with the'-following procedures. A. Grantee shall disburse the federal and nonfederal shares of the eligible costs for Small Projects to Subgrantee as soon as practicable after execution of this Agreement and formal notification by the Federal Emergency Management Agency of its approval of the pertinent Project Worksheet. B. Grantee shall reimburse Subgrantee for the federal and nonfederal shares of the eligible costs for Large Projects as soon as practicable after Subgrantee has delivered the following documents to Grantee: 1. A Request for Advance or Reimbursement Form conforming to the sample attached to this Agreement,as Attachment A; 2. A Summary of Documentation Form conforming to the sample attached to this Agreement as Attachment B, which shall be supported by original documents such as contract documents, invoices, purchase orders, change orders and the like; and 3. A letter or notification certifying that the reported costs were incurred in the performance of eligible work. C. Grantee may advance funds under this Agreement to Subgrantee not exceeding the federal share if Subgrantee meets Page 7 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL it 16F 1 the following conditions: 1. Subgrantee shall demonstrate to Grantee that Subgrantee has procedures in place to ensure that funds are disbursed to project vendors, contractors, and subcontractors without unnecessary delay; 2. Subgrantee shall submit to Grantee the budget supporting the request; 3. Subgrantee shall submit a statement justifying the advance and the proposed use of the funds, and specifying the amount of funds requested; 4. Subgrantee shall submit a completed Request for Advance or Reimbursement Form; and S. Subgrantee shall pay over to Grantee any interest earned on advances for remittance to the Federal Emergency Management Agency as often as practicable, and in any event not later than ten (10) business days after the close of each calendar quarter. D. Subgrantee may make improvements to the project facility in conjunction with its restoration of the facility to its predisaster condition in accordance with 44 C.F.R. Part 206 with the prior written approval of Grantee. E. In any case in which Subgrantee certifies to Grantee in writing that the restoration of a damaged public facility to its predisaster condition is not in the best interest of the public, Subgrantee may request Grantee and the Federal Emergency Management Agency to approve an alternate project in accordance with 44 C.F.R. Part 206 before the commencement of any work. Page 8 g FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16F 1 F. Grantee may, in its discretion, withhold its portion of the nonfederal share of funding under this Agreement from Subgrantee if Grantee has reason to expect a subsequent unfavorable determination by the Federal Emergency Management Agency that a previous disbursement of funds under this Agreement was improper. ARTICLE IX. Final Payment. Grantee shall disburse the final payment to Subgrantee upon the performance of the following conditions: A. Subgrantee shall have completed the project; B. Subgrantee shall have submitted the documentation specified in Articles VI and VIII of this Agreement; C. In the case of Large Projects, the Grantee shall have performed the final inspection; D. In the case of Small Projects, the Project Listing and Certification shall have been reviewed by Grantee, or Grantee shall have performed a final inspection; and E. Subgrantee shall have requested final reimbursement. ARTICLE X. Records Maintenance. The funding of eligible costs under this Agreement and the performance of all other conditions shall be subject to the following requirements, in addition to such other and further requirements as may be imposed by operation of law: A. The "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments," as codified in 44 C.F.R. Part 13, as amended; Page 9 9 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16F 1 B. Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A -87, "Cost Principles for State and Local Governments," as amended; C. Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A -110, "Uniform Administrative Requirements for Grants and Other Agree- ments with Institutions of Higher Education, Hospitals and Other Non - Profit Organizations," as amended; and D. Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A -122, "Cost Principles for Non - Profit Organizations," as amended. E. Subgrantee will maintain all documentation concerning the projects funded under this Agreement until the occurrence of the following events, whichever is the later: 1. The completion of final inspection and final audit, and the final resolution of any issues identified in the same; or 2. The expiration of three (3) years from the date of.final disbursement under this Agreement. F. Subgrantee shall make all documentation concerning the projects funded under this Agreement available and accessible to the Comptroller General of the United States, the Grantee, and the Federal Emergency Management Agency between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. on weekdays other than official holidays. ARTICLE XI. Reimbursement of Funds If upon final inspection, final audit, or other review by Grantee, the Federal Emergency Management Agency or other authority determines that the disbursements to Subgrantee under this Agreement exceed the eligible costs, Subgrantee shall reimburse to Grantee the sum by which the total disbursements exceed the eligible costs within Page 10 t 10 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16F 1 forty -five (45) days from the date Subgrantee is notified of such determination. ARTICLE XII. Audit. Subgrantee shall submit an Audit of Agreement Compliance to Grantee, and shall have an independent audit performed by a Certified Public Accountant if its total expenditures of federal financial assistance for the most recent fiscal year equal or exceed $300,000.00. A. Subgrantee will conduct the audit in accordance with the following requirements:. 1. The standards established by the Comptroller General of the United States, as specified in the General Accounting Office Standards for Audit of Governmental Organizations, Programs, Activities and Functions; 2. The standards established by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants; 3. The requirements of §§ 11.45, 216.349, and 216.3491, Fla. Stat. (2001), and the Rules of the Auditor General; 4. The requirements of the Single Audit Act of 1984, Pub. L. 98 -502, as amended, 31 U.S.C. §§ 7501 -7507, to the extent here applicable; and 5. Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A -133, as amended, to the extent here applicable. B. The audit shall be identified by the serial contract identification number for this Agreement. If the Subgrantee is a private nonprofit organization, it shall submit an organization - wide audit. Page 11 I 1 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16F 1 C. The audit shall be due not later than seven (7) months after the close of the fiscal year for Subgrantee except where Grantee and Subgrantee have mutually agreed upon another date. D. Subgrantee shall conduct such additional audits as Grantee or the Federal Emergency Management Agency may determine necessary to determine the adequacy, accuracy, and reliability fo the internal procedures Subgrantee has in place to protect its assets and to ensure compliance with this Agreement. E. If this Agreement is closed out without an audit, Grantee may recover from Subgrantee any disallowed costs identified in an audit after such closeout. ARTICLE XIII. Noncompliance. If the Subgrantee violates this Agreement or any legislation, regulation, statute, rule or other legal requirement applicable to the performance of this Agreement, the Grantee may withhold any disbursement otherwise due Subgrantee for the project with respect to which the violation has occurred until the violation is cured or has otherwise come to final resolution. If the violation is not cured, Grantee may terminate this Agreement and invoke its remedied under the Agreement in accordance with Articles XXI and XXV of this Agreement. ARTICLE XIV. Nondiscrimination by Contractors. Subgrantee shall undertake an active program of nondiscrimination in its administration of disaster assistance under this Agreement, in accordance with 44 C.F.R. Parts 7 and 16, and 44 C.F.R Part 206. In addition, Subgrantee shall,be subject to the requirements in Page 12 12 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16F 1 the General Services Administrative Consolidated List of Debarred, Suspended and Ineligible Contractors, in accordance with 44 C.F.R Part 17. ARTICLE XV. Modification. The time for performance of this Agreement may be extended once unless the failure of Subgrantee to close out the project is caused by events beyond ita control. A modification extending the time for completion of the project and any other modification shall be in writing, and shall take effect only upon execution by both parties. Modifications to any Project Worksheet to be funded under this Agreement may be requested by Subgrantee through Grantee, but the approval of any such modifications shall reside in the sole discretion of the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Any approved modification to a project Worksheet shall be noted in a Supplemental Project Worksheet for the project. If otherwise allowed under this Agreement, any extension shall be in writing and shall be subject to the same terms and conditions as those set out in the initial Agreement. ARTICLE XVI. Time for Performance Time shall be of the essence of this Agreement and of the performance of all conditions under it. Subject to any modification extending the time for the performance of this Agreement approved by Grantee or by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, the time for the performance of emergency work shall be six (6) months from the date of the Presidential Declaration. The time for the performance of permanent work shall be eighteen (18) months from the date of the Page 13 13 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16F Presidential Declaration. For Large Projects the Summary of Documentation and the supporting documents identified in Article VI of this Agreement shall be submitted to the Grantee not later than sixty (60) days after the date of the last modification extending the Agreement. Subgrantee shall submit the completed Project Listing to Grantee not later than thirty (3a) days from the completion of all work, or the approval of the Final Inspection by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, whichever is later. The time for the performance of this Agreement may be extended for cause by Grantee. If any extension request is denied, Subgrantee shall be reimbursed for eligible project costs incurred up to the latest approved date for completion. Failure to complete any project will be adequate cause for the termination of funding for that project. ARTICLE XVII. Contracts With Others If the Subgrantee contracts with any other contractor or vendor for performance of all or any portion of the work required under this Agreement, the Subgrantee shall incorporate into its contract with such contractor or vendor an indemnification clause holding Grantee and Subgrantee harmless from liability to third parties for claims asserted under such contract. ARTICLE XVIII. Termination. Either of the parties may terminate this Agreement by notice in writing delivered to the address specified in Article XXIII of this Agreement. Such termination shall take effect thirty (30) days after the date of such notice. Such termination shall not affect the rights, Page 14 14 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16F 1 '. interests, duties or responsibilities of either of the parties or any allowable costs that have accrued as of the date of the notice of termination. ARTICLE XIX. Liability, A. Grantee assumes no liability to third parties in connection with this Agreement. Unless the Subgrantee is a governmental entity covered by § 768.28(5), Fla. Stat. (2001), the Subgrantee shall be solely responsible to any and all contractors, vendors, and other parties with whom it contracts in performing this Agreement. Unless the Subgrantee is a governmental entity within the meaning of the preceding sentence, Subgrantee shall indemnify Grantee form claims asserted by to third parties in connection with the performance of this Agreement, holding Grantee and Subgrantee harmless from the same. B. For the purpose of this Agreement, the Grantee and Subgrantee agree that neither one is an employee or agent of the other, and that each one stands as an independent contractor in relation to the other. C. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as a waiver by Grantee or Subgrantee of any legal immunity, nor shall anything in this Agreement be construed as a consent by either of the parties to,be sued by third parties in connection with any matter arising from the performance of this Agreement. D. Subgrantee represents that to the best of its knowledge any hazardous substances at its project site or sites are present in quantities within statutory and regulatory limitations, and do Page 15 15 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16F not require remedial action under any federal, state or local legal requirements concerning such substances. Subgrantee further represents that the presence of any such substance or any condition at the site caused by the presence of any such substance shall be addressed in accordance with all applicable legal requirements. ARTICLE XX. Reports. Subgrantee shall provide Quarterly Reports to Grantee, on the Quarterly Report Form conforming to the sample attached as Attachment C. The first Quarterly Report shall be due at such time as Subgrantee is notified. All subsequent Quarterly Reports shall be due not later than thirty (30) days after each calendar quarter through final inspection. Quarterly Reports shall indicate the anticipated completion date for each project, together with any other circumstances that may affect the completion date, the scope of work, the project costs, or any other factors that may affect compliance with this Agreement. Interim inspections shall be scheduled by Subgrantee before the final inspection, and may be required by Grantee based on information supplied in the Quarterly Reports. Grantee may require additional reports as needed, and Subgrantee shall provide any additional reports requested by Grantee as soon as practicable. With respect to the Request for Advance or Reimbursement, the Summary of Documentation, and the Quarterly Reports, the contact for Grantee will be the State Public Assistance Officer. ARTICLE XXI. Standard Conditions Subgrantee agrees to the Page 16 16 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16F 1 . following conditions: A. The performance and obligation of Grantee to pay under this Agreement is contingent upon an annual appropriation by the Legislature and the disbursement to Grantee of federal funding in accordance with § 252.37(4), Fla. Stat. (2001). B. Bills for fees or other compensation for services or expenses must be submitted in detail sufficient for a proper pre- audit and post- audit. C. Grantee may terminate this Agreement for refusal by the Subgrantee and its contractors and subcontractors to allow public inspection of any records subject to the disclosure requirements in § 119.07(1), Fla. Stat. (2001), that are made or received by Subgrantee or its contractors and subcontractors in connection with this Agreement. Substantial evidence of noncompliance by Subgrantee or its contractors and subcontractors with these requirements shall constitute the nonperformance of a condition under this Agreement, and shall be adequate cause for termination. D. Subgrantee agrees that no funds disbursed to it under this Agreement will be used for the purpose of lobbying the Legislature or any of its members, any employee of the State of Florida, any member of Congress, any officer or employee of Congress, or any employee of a Member of Congress, in connection with this Agreement or any modifications to this Agreement. E. Subgrantee certifies with respect to this Agreement that it possesses the legal authority to receive the funds. F. Subgrantee agrees that responsibility for compliance with Page 17 17 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16F 1 this Agreement rests with the Subgrantee, and further agrees that noncompliance with this Agreement shall be adequate cause for the recission, suspension or termination of funding under this Agreement, and may affect its eligibility for funding under future Subgrantee Agreements. ARTICLE XXII. Term, This Agreement shall take effect upon its execution by both parties, and shall terminate upon the approval of closeout by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, unless terminated earlier as specified elsewhere in this Agreement. Subgrantee shall commence the project(s) specified by this Agreement without delay. ARTICLE XXIII. Notice and Contact. All notices under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be delivered by InterNet, by telefacsimile, by hand, or by certified letter to the following respective addresses. FOR THE GRANTEE: W. Craig Fugate, Director Division of Emergency Management Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -2100 FOR THE SUBGRANTEE: James N. Coletta, Chairman Board of oun y Commissioners amiami Traii East Naples, Fl. J41i2 ARTICLE XXIV. Designation of Agent. Subgrantee hereby designates ONJ 1-'Rtt..` wt�s eon as its primary agent, and designates fir. ' l \P- .-LL as its alternate agent, to execute any Request for Advance or Reimbursement, certification, or other necessary documentation. ARTICLE XXV. Events of Default Remedies and Termination A. Upon the occurrence of any one or more of the following Page 18 18 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL I�F i events, all obligations of Grantee to disburse further funds under this Agreement shall terminate at the option of Grantee. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, Grantee may at its option continue to make payments or portions of payments after the occurrence of any one or more such events without waiving the right to exercise such remedies and without incurring liability for further payment. Grantee may at its option terminate this Agreement and any and all funding under this Agreement upon the occurrence of any one or more of the following: 1. Any representation by Subgrantee in this Agreement is inaccurate or incomplete in any material respect, or Subgrantee has breached any condition of this Agreement or any previous agreement with Grantee and has not cured in timely fashion, or is unable or unwilling to meet its obligations under this Agreement. 2. Subgrantee suffers any material adverse change in its financial condition while this Agreement is in effect, as compared to its financial condition as represented in any reports or other documents submitted to Grantee, if Subgrantee has not cured the condition within thirty (30) days after notice in writing from Grantee; 3. Any reports required by this Agreement have not been submitted to Grantee or have been submitted with inaccurate, incomplete, or inadequate information; or 4. The monies necessary to fund this Agreement are unavailable due to any failure to appropriate or other action or inaction by Congress or the Legislature, or due to any action of Page 19 19 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16F 1 the Office of the Comptroller or the Office of Management and Budget. B. Upon the occurrence of any one or more of the following events, Grantee may at its option give notice in writing to Subgrantee to cure its failure of performance if such failure may be cured. Upon the failure of Subgrantee to cure, Grantee may exercise any one or more of the following remedies: 1. Terminate this Agreement upon not less than fifteen (15) days notice of such termination by certified letter to the Subgrantee at the address specified in Article XXIII of this Agreement, such notice to take effect when delivered to Subgrantee; 2. Commence a legal action for the judicial enforcement of this Agreement; 3. Withhold the disbursement of any payment or any portion of a payment otherwise due and payable under this Agreement or any other Agreement with Subgrantee; and 4. Take any other remedial actions which may otherwise be available under law. C. Grantee may terminate this Agreement for any misrepresentation of any material fact, for the failure or nonperformance of any condition or obligation under this Agreement, or for noncompliance with any applicable legal requirement. D. Rescission, suspension or termination of this Agreement shall constitute final action by the Grantee within the meaning of Page 20 20 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 16F the Administrative Procedure Act, as amended. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, any deobligation of funds or other determination by the Federal Emergency Management Agency shall be addressed in accordance with the regulations of that Agency. E. Upon the rescission, suspension or termination of this Agreement, the Subgrantee shall refund to Grantee all funds disbursed to Subgrantee under this Agreement. F. The venue of any action or proceeding by either Grantee or Subgrantee for the enforcement of this Agreement or for an adjudication of the rights, interests, or duties of the parties to it shall lie in Leon County, State of Florida. G. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary elsewhere in this Agreement, the rescission, suspension or termination of this Agreement by Grantee shall not relieve Subgrantee of liability to Grantee for the restitution of funds advanced to Subgrantee under this Agreement, and Grantee may set off any such funds by withholding future disbursements otherwise due Subgrantee under this Agreement or any other Agreement until such time as the exact amount of restitution due Grantee from Subgrantee is determined. In the event the Federal Emergency Management Agency should deobligate funds formerly allowed under this Agreement or under any other Agreement funded by the Agency and administered by Grantee, then Subgrantee shall immediately repay such funds to Grantee. If the Subgrantee fails to repay any such funds, then Grantee may recover the same from funding otherwise due Subgrantee in accordance with this Article. Page 21 21 FEMA- 1393 -DR -FL 1 16f 1 ARTICLE XXVI. Attachments. A. All attachments to this Agreement are incorporated into this Agreement by reference as if set out fully in the text of the Agreement itself. B. In the event of any inconsistencies between the language of this Agreement and the Attachments to it, the language of the Attachments shall be controlling, but only to the extent of such inconsistencies. C. This Agreement has the following attachments: 1. Attachment A "Request for Advance or Reimbursement" 2. Attachment B "Summary of Documentation" 3. Attachment C "Quarterly Report Schedule and Instructions" Page 22 22 FEMA - 1393 -DR -FL 16F IN WITNESS HEREOF, the Grantee and Subgrantee have executed this Agreement: DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, State of Florida, By: ,W rang Ja e, Director �Divisiop of Ertlgrgency Management ^� DWTGHT 'F i:)BRRCK, Clerk r•. '<1, (Date) AtUst At t0 nw' S sipstw a Mly. Public Assistance Program Program Description 02 -RM -* 2- 09 -21 -20 -010 Contract Number Ochonee Fire Control District (Subgrantee) James N. Coletta (Name)Boacd Count Co io ers (Signatur C:hai rman (Title) (Date) 59- 6000558 Federal Employer ID No. Approved as to form and legal r_sufficiency: ji c eline Hubbard Robinson sistant County Attorney Page 23 23 FEMA- 1393 -DR-FL 1 Feb 06 02 03:35p p.4 FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY O.M.B. No. 3087 -0151 PROJECT WORKSHEET I Espires April 30, 2001 PAPERWORK BURDEN DISCLOSURE NOTICE Public reporting burden for this forth is estimated to average 30 minutes. The burden estimate includes the e Petievning instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering and maintaining the needed data, and completing and submitting the forms. You are not required to respond to this collection of information unless a valid OMB control number is displayed in the upper right corner of the forms. Send comments regarding the accuracy of the burden estimate and any suggestions for reducing the burden too: Information Collections Management, Federal Emergency Management Agency, 500 C Street, SW, Washington, DC 20472, Paperwork Reduction Project (3067- 0151). NOTE: Do not send your completed form to this address. DECLARATION NO. PROJECT No. FIPS NO. DATE CATEGORY FEMA- 1393-DR- FL October 4, 2001 B DAMAGED FACILITY NIA WORK COMPLETE AS OF: 9!26/01 100 % APPLICANT COUNTY Ochopee Fire Control District Collier Co. FL LOCATION 201 Buckner Ave. N., Everglades City, FL 34139 LATITUDE LONGITUDE DAMAGE DESCRIPTION AND DIMENSIONS Fire & rescue operations district wide SCOPE OF WORK Collier county Fleet Management Department removed interior, vaccummed sand from floor, cleaned with disinfectant, repaired and sealed all butt connectors, Inspected all plugs for corrosion. Replaced jute backing on the floor mat, reassembled and test drove. Work Order #12586. Work Order #12533 - See Attached, Work Order #12969 -Removed driver's side door panel. Cable from windor motor to regulator pulled apart have power window motor now, only manual. . Removed driver's side rear door panel and removed window motor and cable to use in front door. Driver's side near door does not Work to be completed - Replace exhaust manifold and serpetine belt. Overtime cost incurred for firefighters. Equipment use incurred for firefighters responding to Tropical Storm events. Due to the level of saltwater intrusion vehicle needs to be salvaged and new one purchased. Does the Scope of Work diange the pr"sastea Conditions at the site? ❑ Yes ® No Special Considerations issues included? ® Yes ❑ No Haami Nfigetion proposal included? ❑ Yes ®No Is there inwrtnee coverage on this facility? ❑ Yes ❑ No rTEM CODE NARRATIVE QUANTITY1UNIT UNIT PRICE COST 1 9999 Re airs completed.- 1.00 / LS $963.70 969 2 9999 Work to be completed 1.00 / LS $411.29 $411 3 9007 Overtime Emergency Responders 1.00 / LS $813.50 $613 4 9008 E ui ent 1.00 ! LS $1,022.00 $1,022 6 9999 Fire Chief Command Vehicle 1.00/1 $38.253.0 $38,2 53 / 0 / 0. / 0. TOTAL COST $41.483. PREPARED BY: TITLE: Fine Chief FEMA Form w91. SEP 9e peep anea �.. ese.................._ * ** 2941625 OR; 2991 PG; 1572 RICORDID in OIIICIAL RICORDS of COLLIIR COUNTY, IL 03/0!/2002 at 07 :41AM DWIGHT I. BROCR, CARE RIC IS! 4,00 Retn: SATISFACTION OF CIVIL JUDGMENT LIEN CIVIL 16J 1 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: Kevin Roy Savage 3011 Sandpiper Circle Naples, Florida 33962 CASE NUMBER: 94- 161 -CFA bearing the date of 1st day of August, 1994 recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, securing the principal sum of * * ** One thousand three hundred ninety & no /100 ($1,390.00) * *DOLLARS, by Civil Judgment recorded in Official Record Book 1972, Page 2391. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said Lien, hereby surrenders the same as cancelled, and hereby directs the Clerk of said Circuit Court to cancel the Lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this cZ_�. _ day of , 2002. ATTEST. CLERK .QF' HE t,I,RCUIT COURT COLLIER. COUNTY,, FLORIDA By: - DepUty Clerk Attest f�s'to`Chiin=t': stpatw* M1l. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Assistant C unty Attorney CRIMINAL DIVISION BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA nz, irwii Prepared By: DWIGHT E. BROCK CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P. 0. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101 -3044 SATISFACTION OF CIVIL JUDGMENT LIEN *** 2941691 OR: 2991 PG: 1792 ` RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/04/2002 at 08:14AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 6.00 Retn: CRIKINAL DIVISION 16J 1 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: Michael J. Stiles 3775 7th Avenue, NW Naples, Florida 33999 CASE NUMBER: 90- 6304 -TM bearing the date of 29th day of October, 1991 recorded in the office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, securing the principal sum of * * ** Three hundred eighty & no /100 ($380.00) * *DOLLARS, by Civil Judgment recorded in Official Record Book 1672, Page 51. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said Lien, hereby surrenders the same as cancelled, and hereby directs the Clerk of said Circuit Court to cancel the Lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this day of �T-�.. , 2002. ATTEST;: ' En�"L CLERK OF THE 1-d];RCUIT COURT COLLIER gMNTY`j FLORIDA ,t Ate ui' cc Iirow'_ sigaatwo Mly. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: G Assis ant County Attorney CRIMINAL DIVISION BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Prepared By: DWIGHT E. BROCK CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P. 0. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101 -3044 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE February 26, 2002 Board Meeting FOR BOARD ACTION: 16J2 Satisfaction of Lien: NEED MOTION authorizing the Chairman to sign Satisfaction of Lien for Services of the Public Defender for Case Nos.: CIK020130 -12 RECOMMEND _ ""T'• A. Clerk of Courts: Submitted for public record, pursuant to Florida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(1), the disbursements for the Board of County Commissioners for the period: Disbursements for January 25, 2002 through February 1, 2002_ 2. Disbursements for February 2, 2002 through February 8, 2002. B. Districts: Ochopee Fire Control District Advisory Board — Meeting Minutes for October 1 ", 2001; January 7, 2002 C. Minutes: Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Advisory Board — Minutes of November 8, 2001, Minutes of August 21, 2001, Agenda for February 7, 2002 2. Collier County Water & Wastewater Authority — Minutes of October 23, 2000. 3. Forest Lakes Roadway and Drainage M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee — Minutes of January 11, 2002; Minutes of January 11, 2002. 4. Community Character /Smart Growth Advisory Committee — Agenda for December 5, 2001; Minutes of December 5, 2001 5. Golden Gate Estates Land Trust Committee — Minutes of December 11, 2000; February 26, 2001; April 23, 2001; August 13, 2001 and October 22, 2001. N 7. H:Data/Format Health and Human Services Advisory Committee — Agenda for December 20, 2001, Minutes of November 29, 2001. Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee — Minutes of January 2, 2002. AGEN A ITEM No._ J�» FEB 2 6 2002 Pg.— -j 2002, I� a) Clam Bay Sub - Committee - Agenda for February 4, 2002 8. Workforce Housing Committee - Agenda for November 16, 2000; Meeting Notice for Workforce Housing Committee - December 14, 2000, Minutes of December 14, 2000, Notice of Meeting January 17, 2001, Minutes of January 18, 2001, Special Meeting Notice for February 6, 2001, Notice for February 15, 2001, Notice of Meeting for March 15, 2001, Minutes of March 15, 2001, Notice of Meeting for April 19, 2001, Notice of Meeting for April 5, 2001, Meeting Notice for May 9, 2001, Meeting Notice for June 21, 2001, Meeting Notice for July 19, 2001, Meeting Notice of October 18, 2001, Meeting Notice for November 15, 2001. 9. Enterprise Zone Development Agency - Minutes of November 29, 2001, Minutes of January 24, 2002 10. Collier County Library Advisory Board - Agenda for January 23, 2002 11. 1 -75 /Golden Gate Interchange - Agenda for January 30, 2002, Minutes of December 12, 2001. 12. Workforce Housing Advisory Committee - Agenda for February 4, 2002, Minutes of January 7, 2002 13. Environmental Advisory Council - Agenda February 6, 2002, Minutes of December 5, 2001. 14. Vanderbilt Beach M.S.T.U. - Agenda for February 7, 2002, Minutes of January 10, 2002. 15. Collier County Planning Commission - Agenda for February 7, 2002. 16. Collier County Hispanic Affairs Advisory Board - Agenda for January 31, 2002. 17. Golden Gate Beautification Advisory Committee - Agenda for February 12, 2002, Minutes of January 8, 2001 18. Coastal Advisory Committee - Minutes of November 1, 2001, December 6, 2001 and January 11, 2002 19. Collier County Code Enforcement Board - Agenda for December 17, 2001, Minutes of December 17, 2001, November 29, 2001, Minutes of November 29, 2001. H:Data/Format o�.�HE ClItCGlr U H Dwight E. Brock Clerk L I�� County �o'f�Collier p Orel2cRtIE �ui�tr`c��i ffIbtian URT 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST Colll9TOiBO>'#xida Finance & Accounting Department MEMORANDUM Date: 02/01/02 To: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners From: Constance C. Murray, General Operations Manager Finance Department /Clerk to the Board Re: Board of County Commissioners Disbursements 16J1 CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Please find attached a listing of the disbursements for the Board of County Commissioners for the period January 25, 2002 through February 1, 2002. In accordance with Florida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(l) I request that these reports be included as miscellaneous correspondence to the Board of County Commissioners and made part of the official records. If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please telephone me at 774- 8481. Misc. Corres: Date: -a : Il Item# ) Lej t Copies To: JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 569267 VENDOR 350570 - ROYAL PAVERS 20012030 N285 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 152250 REPAIR DRIVEWAY CHECK NO 569082 VENDOR 273240 - 21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY 20012268 11/27 E GONZALEZ 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 0.00 203888 11/27 E GONZALEZ CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20012268 12/6.11/12,13 E GONZALEZ 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 1,101.17 203888 12/6,11/12,13 E GONZALEZ 1,101.17 822.37 20012267 L SANTOS 11/19,21 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 203.66 203863 L SANTOS 11/19,21 0.00 4,409.01 20012267 L SANTOS 11/19 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 0.00 203863 L SANTOS 11/19 1,206.13 0.00 20012268 11/23 E GONZALEZ 001- 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 2.046.42 203888 11/23 E GONZALEZ 2,046.42 1,025.10 20012267 L SANTOS 11/15,16,19.20 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 407.49 203863 L SANTOS 11/15.16,19,20 0.00 14,704.78 20012268 11/28 E GONZALEZ 001- 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 203888 11/28 E GONZALEZ 20012267 E GONZALEZ 11/23 001- 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 E GONZALEZ 11/23 20012268 11/29,30 12/03E GONZALEZ 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 203888 11/29.30 12/03E GONZALEZ 20012267 L SANTOS 11/7,8,9,12 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 L SANTOS 11/7/8/9,12 203863 20012268 12/3,5 11/29 E GONZALEZ 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 203888 12/3,5 11/29 E GONZALEZ 20012268 12/13,14 E GONZALEZ 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 203888 12/13,14 E GONZALEZ CHECK NO 569264 VENDOR 350460 - A- TURNER MOVING AND STORAGE 16J2AGE , AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 598.60 0.00 598.60 1,101.17 0.00 1,101.17 822.37 0.00 822.37 203.66 0.00 203.66 4,409.01 0.00 4,409.01 874.17 0.00 874.17 1,344.15 0.00 1,344.15 1,206.13 0.00 1,206.13 666.51 0.00 666.51 2.046.42 0.00 2,046.42 1,025.10 0.00 1,025.10 407.49 0.00 407.49 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 14,704.78 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2PAGE 2 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012410 RELOCATION EXP- LINCOLN 001. 121143- 528100 -00000 0.00 3,037.91 0.00 204017 RELOCATION EXP R LINCOLN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568915 VENDOR 161100 - AAA GENERATOR & PUMP INC. 20011678 GO1 -1336 12/28 408. 233351 - 634999 -00000 0.00 200747 REPAIR /MAINTANCE 20011663 G02 -0057 1/9 408. 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 200192 REPAIR /PARTS VCHR NET 3.037.91 3.037.91 78.50 0.00 78.50 223.41 0.00 223.41 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 301.91 CHECK NO 569106 VENDOR 285940 - AACTION MULCH OF SW FL, INC. 20011857 21194 1/8 111 - 163646 - 646318.00000 0.00 6,099.60 201896 MULCH 20011856 2197 1/8 111 - 163646 - 646318 -00000 0.00 6,099.60 201896 MULCH CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 569070 VENDOR 263750 - AARENDS COURIER SERVICE 20011651 9044 12/28 113 - 138312. 641950 -00000 0.00 12/28 COURIER SERVICE CHECK NO 568893 VENDOR 147860 - ABE SKINNER, PROPERTY APPRAISER 20011961 2002.04 1 /11 473 - 173413 - 647110 -00000 0.00 203989 PRINTING BLUE LINE MAPS 20011960 PRINTS OF BLUE LINE MAPS 313 - 163673 - 647110 -60171 0.00 PRINTS OF BLUE LINE MAPS CHECK NO 569113 VENDOR 288960 - ABLE BODY TEMPORARY SERVICE 20011690 115006614 109 - 182901 - 634999 -00000 0.00 200061 TEMPORARY LABOR 20011690 115006614 109. 182602- 634999 -00000 0.00 200061 TEMPORARY LABOR 130.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.099.60 6.099.60 12.199.20 130.00 130.00 11.00 0.00 11.00 16.50 0.00 16.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 27.50 2,663.99 0.00 2,663.99 624.89 0.00 624.89 JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION n COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 6 J AGE 3 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569102 VENDOR 282670 - ADVANCED AIR & REFRIGERATION, INC. 20011855 2448 12/18 301 - 120435 - 763100 -80162 0.00 10,120.00 0.00 200878 REPLACE DUCT WORK IMMOKALEE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569078 VENDOR 268650 - ADVANCED FIRE SYSTEMS INC 20011700 53348 1/3 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 200197 INSPECTION MAINTANCE 20011700 53349 1/3 408 - 253212. 634999 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 200197 INSPECTION MAINTANCE 20011700 53345 1/3 408 - 253212. 634999 -00000 0.00 225.00 0.00 200197 INSPECTION MAINTANCE 20011700 53347 1/3 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 200197 INSPECTION MAINTANCE 20011700 53346 1/3 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 200197 INSPECTION MAINTANCE 20011700 53351 1/3 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 200197 INSPECTION MAINTANCE 20011700 53350 1/3 408. 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 200197 INSPECTION MAINTANCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569155 VENDOR 315350 - AEC NATIONAL 20010927 010211 381 - 120402- 631401 -80003 0.00 60.200.00 0.00 203133 TO 12/31/01 20011869 010212 381 - 120402. 631402 -80196 0.00 4,697.00 0.00 5706 THRU 12/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569167 VENDOR 320830 - AEC NATIONAL /WILKISON JOINT VENTURE 20011870 010403 414- 263611 - 631400 -73060 0.00 1,417.50 0.00 7239 TO 12/31/01 20011870 010403 412 - 273511 - 631400.70074 0.00 1,417.50 0.00 7239 TO 12/31/01 6J2AGE 4 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569298 VENDOR 900080 - AETNA HEALTHCARE 301148 AMB.REF AETNA 6/24/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 17.60 0.00 AMB.REF J.SMITH #0125920 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569299 VENDOR 900080 - AETNA US HEALTHCARE 301167 AMB.REF AETNA 7/21/01 490. 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 126.60 0.00 AMB.REF L.MOREFIELD #0128157 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568877 VENDOR 131010 - AFFORDABLE PETCARE CENTER 20011692 01 -9489 D.STEINBERG 610 - 155410. 631970 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 200584 1/16 VET FEES FOR ADOPTION 20011692 01 -9529 K.YENTES 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 200584 1/16 VET FEES FOR ADOPTION 20011692 01 -9339 C. O'TEARY 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 200584 1/16 VET FEES FOR ADOPTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568750 VENDOR 300 - AGNOLI, BARBER & BRUNDAGE, INC. 20012186 R10620 -1 368. 116360 - 631401 -00165 0.00 259.00 0.00 3030 THRU 9/11/01 20012186 010619 368 - 116360 - 631401 -00165 0.00 1,018.00 0.00 3030 THRU 9/11/01 20012186 R10620 368 - 116360. 631401 -00165 0.00 35.00 0.00 3030 THRU 9/11/01 20012186 R10355 368 - 116360. 631401 -00165 0.00 522.00 0.00 3030 THRU 8/14/01 20012186 010850 368 - 116360 - 631401 -00165 0.00 2,333.00 0.00 3030 THRU 10/16/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569235 VENDOR 345890 - AGRO DISTRIBUTION II 6J2AGE 5 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012290 07139400 12/20 001 - 172930 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,437.00 0.00 202294 HERBICIDES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568937 VENDOR 172480 - ALAN PRODUCTIONS 20011638 1120 -01 R.COLES 681 - 410310. 633032 -00000 0.00 150.00 0.00 1120 -01 R. COLES 01- 01235 - CFA -WLB CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569278 VENDOR 900030 - ALBERTO SANCHEZ 301129 2/3 -8 ADV PD A SANCHEZ 001 - 155410 - 640300 -00000 0.00 105.00 0.00 2/3 -8 ADV PD A SANCHEZ CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568995 VENDOR 211230 - ALBERTSONS STORE #4422 20011646 IT DEPT STATUS /BUDGET /UPD 001. 121152- 652210 -00000 0.00 116.98 0.00 IT DEPT STATUS /UPDATE MTG 1/16 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568872 VENDOR 127610 - ALL ANIMALS CLINIC 20012235 01 -9525 1/24 R. ZINE 610 - 155410. 631970.00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 200590 1/24 R. ZINE 20011691 01 -9462 M. MELENDEZ 610 - 155410 - 631970.00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 200590 1/16 ADOPTION FEES 20011691 01 -8393 P. SCHENK 610 - 155410 - 631970.00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 200590 1/16 ADOPTION FEES 20011691 01 -8175 E. CASE 610 - 155410 - 631970.00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 200590 1/16 ADOPTION FEES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568956 VENDOR 184390 - ALL STATE BIOGUARD SERVICES, INC. 20011969 36846 11/26 518 - 121630. 631990.00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 203222 WASTE DISPOSAL FEES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568853 VENDOR 109760 - ALLIED CRANE SERVICE JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20011643 D7999 112 152144 CRANE SERVICE 20011643 D8057 1/2 152144 CRANE SERVICE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408. 233312 - 634999.00000 0.00 408. 233312 - 634999 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 568852 VENDOR 109450 ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORPORATION 20011696 I0239401 01/04 113 - 138915- 651210 -00000 408- 233352 - 652310 -00000 200271 200741 COT -SOD HYPO 20011694 20011656 I0239402 1/4 111 - 156310 - 646710 -00000 408 - 233312 - 652310.00000 201294 200688 COT -SOD HYPO 20011682 20011696 I0237861 01102 408 - 210151. 651210 -00000 408 - 233352 - 652310 -00000 201075 200741 COT -SOD HYPO 20011675 20011696 I0237680 12/20 408- 210105 - 634999 -00000 408 - 233352 - 652310 -00000 200179 200741 COT -SOD HYPO 20011676 20011657 I0238764 1/3 408- 233352 - 646970 -00000 408- 233312 - 652310 -00000 200605 200688 COT -SOD HYPO 0.00 20011658 I0239347 1/4 348.53 408- 233312 - 652310 -00000 348.53 200688 COT -SOD HYPO 0.00 20011696 I0238757 01/03 408 - 233352 - 652310 -00000 200741 COT -SOD HYPO CHECK NO 568751 VENDOR 550 - ALPHA OMEGA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 20011693 0 31670 111 -211 113 - 138915- 651210 -00000 420.00 200271 RENTAL CHECK TOTAL 20011694 031606 11/30 -12/30 111 - 156310 - 646710 -00000 0.00 201294 COPIER SERVICE 1,732.50 20011682 031534 11/28 408 - 210151. 651210 -00000 0.00 201075 11/28 MAINTANCE 1,677.90 20011675 031717 1 /1- 2/2/02 408- 210105 - 634999 -00000 0.00 200179 COPIER MAINTANCE 144.48 20011676 031589 9/30/01- 12/30/01 408- 233352 - 646970 -00000 0.00 200605 COPIER SERVICE MAINTANCE 89.47 16J2AGE 6 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 420.00 0.00 420.00 420.00 0.00 420.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 840.00 0.00 1.703.45 0.00 1,703.45 0.00 1,588.65 0.00 1,588.65 0.00 1,706.95 0.00 1,706.95 0.00 1,688.23 0.00 1,688.23 0.00 1,732.50 0.00 1,732.50 0.00 1,691.55 0.00 1,691.55 0.00 1,677.90 0.00 1,677.90 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 11,789.23 0.00 144.48 0.00 144.48 0.00 99.15 0.00 99.15 0.00 89.47 0.00 89.47 0.00 348.53 0.00 348.53 0.00 77.47 0.00 77.47 JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20011677 031632 11/30/01. 12/30/01 200828 COPIER MAINTANCE 20011682 031678 1211 201075 01 /01 MAINTANCE 20011694 031630 11/30 -12/30 201294 COPIER SERVICE 20011667 031608 11/30 -12/30 106786 COPIER SERVICE 20011694 031581 12/30 201294 PRINT MAINTANCE 20011693 0 31670 111.211 200271 COPIER RENTAL 20011693 0 31670 111 -211 200271 RENTAL COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS VCHR DISC SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 490 - 144610 - 634999 -00000 0.00 408- 210151. 651210 -00000 0.00 111 - 156310. 646710 -00000 0.00 123 - 155975 - 646710 -33075 0.00 111- 156310 - 646710 -00000 0.00 113 - 138915 - 644600 -00000 0.00 113 - 138915. 641950 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569122 VENDOR 295120 - AMERICAN LAFRANCE MEDICMASTER 20011686 10337 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 200837 PARTS 20011686 10315 521. 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 200837 PARTS CHECK NO 568979 VENDOR 197130 - AMERICAN PROBATION & PAROLE ASSOC. 20012240 61100095192 1/9 C. RICE 681- 431310 - 654210 -00000 0.00 153341 MEMBERSHIP C. RICE CHECK NO 568972 VENDOR 193950 - AMERIGAS 20011671 A5330- 027145 1/2 200825 PROPANE GAS 20011671 A5330- 027145 112 200825 PROPANE GAS 490 - 144610 - 643200 -00000 0.00 001 - 061010. 643200.00000 0.00 16J2AGE . AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 298.16 0.00 298.16 99.15 0.00 99.15 280.87 0.00 280.87 72.77 0.00 72.77 595.00 0.00 595.00 83.25 0.00 83.25 2.35 0.00 2.35 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,190.65 73.60 0.00 73.60 256.80 0.00 256.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 330.40 35.00 0.00 35.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 35.00 19.86 0.00 19.86 59.57 0.00 59.57 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 79.43 6J2AGE 8 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 568996 VENDOR 212040 AMERIGAS - NAPLES 20011673 A5578. 227938 1/3 001- 155410 - 643200.00000 0.00 373.82 0.00 200572 PROPANE GAS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569300 VENDOR 900080 ANCHOR BENEFIT CONSULTING 301152 AMB.REF ANCHOR 9/10/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 AMB.REF L.NEWMAN #0132406 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568867 VENDOR 120960 - ANCHOR ENGINEERING 20011874 6494 412 - 273511 - 634999 -70057 0.00 600.00 0.00 106374 12/1- 12/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569161 VENDOR 317980 - ANCHOR HEALTH CENTER 20012241 MERICE AIME 11/26 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 26.00 0.00 201934 MERCIE AIME 11/26 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569132 VENDOR 303170 - ANCHOR HEALTH CENTERS 20012242 M. DORNELUS 12/26/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 29.25 0.00 201935 M. DORNELUS 12/26/01 20012242 P. SYBERT 12/14/01 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 92.30 0.00 201935 P. SYBERT 12/14/01 20012242 M. DORNELUS 01/22/02 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 29.25 0.00 201935 M. DORNELUS 01122102 20012242 M. DORNELUS 12/19/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 29.25 0.00 201935 M. DORNELUS 12/19/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569019 VENDOR 233010 - ANIMALIFE VETERINARY CENTER, P.A. 20011687 01 -9155 FRIENDS OF GUMMI 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 200922 01 -9155 1/16 ADOPTION FEES 20011687 01 -9230 FRIENDS OF GUMMI 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 200922 01 -9230 ADOPTION FEES n 6J2AGE 9 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569301 VENDOR 900080 - ANITA HUBBARD 301136 AMB.REFA.HUBBARD 10/13/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 45.19 0.00 AMB REF A.HUBBARD #0200963 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569216 VENDOR 339570 - ANOTHER PRINTER 20011660 8672 112 001 - 100130 - 647110 -00000 0.00 1,017.20 0.00 200224 PRINTING 20011665 8743 1/16 001 - 100130 - 647110 -00000 0.00 839.80 0.00 200224 PRINTING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569037 VENDOR 254050 - APPLIED TECHNOLOGY, INC. 20011963 6972 8/31 495. 192330- 646410 -00000 0.00 826.53 0.00 153228 PARTS & SHIPPING - REPAIR 20011963 5955 8/31 495. 192330 - 646410.00000 0.00 599.01- 0.00 153228 CREDIT MEMO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569177 VENDOR 325930 - AQUA PURE OF SW FLORIDA. INC 20011681 872758 1/16 001. 155910- 652990 -00000 0.00 55.00 0.00 201843 WATER FOR OFFICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569022 VENDOR 235890 - AQUASURE, INC. 20011670 109186 1/1 001. 122240- 646284 -00000 0.00 265.66 0.00 203054 MONTHLY WATER TREATMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568916 VENDOR 161840 - AQUIFER MAINTENANCE & PERFORMANCE 20011958 21355 12/21 408. 253221- 634999 -00000 0.00 1.200.00 0.00 200417 MAINTANCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568980 VENDOR 197230 - ASPEN PUBLISHERS, INC. 20012239 47557931 12/26 001 - 421030 - 654110.00000 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 10 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 001 - 421030 - 641950.00000 0.00 39.37 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER NEW WIGMORE SET FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 568896 VENDOR 148190 - ARSENE MAJUSTE 489.37 CHECK NO 569174 VENDOR 323320 - AT 20011639 2001 -724CF A. MAISONEUVE 681 - 421190. 634402 -00000 0.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 730 511 5515 2001 -724CF A. MAISONEUVE 12/18 001 - 155810 - 641900 -00000 0.00 20011639 201 -456CF G. OLVERA 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 001 201 -456CF G. OLVERA 20011642 056 286 3920 001 12/7 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 64.00 CHECK NO 568879 VENDOR 132690 - ARTYPE, INC. 13.55 695 -4450 056 286 20011661 020268 1/15 001- 100130 - 647110 -00000 0.00 2.384.00 0.00 2,384.00 200193 1/15 JOURNALS 056 286 3919 001 1/7 146 - 144380. 641900.00000 0.00 25.10 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,384.00 CHECK NO 568980 VENDOR 197230 - ASPEN PUBLISHERS, INC. 20012239 47557931 12/26 001 - 421030 - 654110.00000 0.00 450.00 001 - 421030 - 641950.00000 0.00 39.37 0.00 489.37 NEW WIGMORE SET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 489.37 CHECK NO 569174 VENDOR 323320 - AT & T 20011642 730 511 5515 001 12/18 001 - 155810 - 641900 -00000 0.00 45.32 0.00 45.32 774 -5653 730 511 5515 001 12/18 20011642 056 286 3920 001 12/7 146 - 144380 - 641900 -00000 0.00 13.55 0.00 13.55 695 -4450 056 286 3920 001 12/7 20011641 056 286 3919 001 1/7 146 - 144380. 641900.00000 0.00 25.10 0.00 25.10 695 -3473 056 286 3919 001 1/7 20011642 730 511 3524 001 12/3 146 - 144380. 641900 -00000 0.00 23.50 0.00 23.50 695 -4114 730 511 3524 001 12/3 20011641 730 511 3524 001 1/3 146 - 144380 - 641900 -00000 0.00 18.80 0.00 18.80 695 -4114 730 511 3524 001 1/3 20011642 056 284 2143 001 12/16 495 - 192370 - 641900 -00000 0.00 127.88 0.00 127.88 642 -7878 056 284 2143 001 12/16 20011642 056 286 3919 001 12/7 146 - 144380 - 641900 -00000 0.00 14.64 0.00 14.64 695 -3473 056 286 3919 001 12/7 20011641 056 286 3920 001 1/7 146 - 144380 - 641900.00000 0.00 13.88 0.00 13.88 695 -4450 056 286 3920 001 1/7 JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION CHECK NO 569023 VENDOR 236190 - AT &T 20011640 730 511 0335 001 1/6 1/6 597 -5355 20012073 019. 785. 0647001 12/18 019 - 785 - 0647001 12/18 20011965 020 017 6053 001 1/1 201780 1/1 695.2778 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408 - 233312. 641100 -00000 0.00 001. 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 495 - 192350. 641900 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569203 VENDOR 333620 - AT &T WIRELESS 20011664 9000062 1/5 001 - 443010. 641700 -00000 0.00 201181 691.2873 20011679 10026082 1/5 408- 210130 - 641700.00000 0.00 201522 250 -0254 20011666 10009559 12121 001 - 144510- 641700 -00000 0.00 203746 216 -0590 CHECK NO 569140 VENDOR 309230 - ATTORNEYS' TITLE INSURANCE FUND INC 20011968 64- 2001 - 006369 12/28 306 - 116360 - 631650 -80608 0.00 12/28 TITLE SERVICE 20011968 64- 2001 - 006370 12/28 306 - 116360 - 631650 -80608 0.00 12/28 TITLE SERVICE CHECK NO 569163 VENDOR 318740 - AVAYA, INC. 20012117 2712272185 1212101 2712272185 1212101 20012117 2712261655 1211101 2712261655 1211101 20012117 2712262749 12/1/01 2712262749 1211101 20012117 2712384527 12/14/01 2712384527 12/14/01 16J2AGE 11 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 282.67 80.83 0.00 80.83 1,688.81 0.00 1,688.81 29.51 0.00 29.51 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,799.15 95.79 0.00 95.79 302.56 0.00 302.56 0.55 0.00 0.55 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 398.90 384.10 0.00 384.10 471.50 0.00 471.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 855.60 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 334.80 0.00 334.80 001 - 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 1,926.00 0.00 1,926.00 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 3,719.00 0.00 3,719.00 001 - 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 48.11 0.00 48.11 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 12 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012117 2712401584 12/16/01 001 - 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 2712401584 12/16/01 20012117 2712264840 1211101 001. 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 1,947.78 0.00 1,947.78 2712264840 1211101 20012117 2712087864 11/16/01 001. 000000. 202800 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 2712087864 11/16/01 20012117 2712411519 12/16/01 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 19,875.00 0.00 19,875.00 2712411519 12/16/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 27,900.69 CHECK NO 569065 VENDOR 261250 - AVFUEL CORPORATION 20012238 100978 12/16 001. 144510 - 652410 -00000 0.00 329.84 0.00 329.84 153100 AVIATION FUEL /FLOWAGE FEE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 329.84 CHECK NO 568752 VENDOR 1500 - AVIS RENT A CAR 20011964 U269641035 521 - 122410 - 644610 -00000 0.00 88.87 0.00 88.87 200692 CAR RENTAL 20011964 U436796706 521 - 122410 - 644610 -00000 0.00 144.62 0.00 144.62 200692 CAR RENTAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 233.49 CHECK NO 569108 VENDOR 286720 - AZTEK COMMUNICATIONS 20011655 1676 1/4 495. 192370. 641900 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 LABOR & TRAVEL TO REPROGRAM VOICE ML 20011649 1692 1/8 001 - 121154 - 641900.00000 0.00 400.00 0.00 400.00 5 COMP /5 TELE RUNS 1/8 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 460.00 CHECK NO 569173 VENDOR 323310 - AZURIX NORTH AMERICA UNDERGROUND 20009970 01111.1F 414 - 263611 - 763100 -73050 0.00 80.588.00 0.00 80,588.00 201546 TO 12/31/01 FINAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 80,588.00 CHECK NO 568895 VENDOR 147980 - B & B TOWING CHECK NO 569001 VENDOR 215140 - BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 13 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011685 48462 521 - 122410. 646415.00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 200694 TOWING SERVICE 20011685 49408 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 200694 TOWING SERVICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 70.00 CHECK NO 569194 VENDOR 331390 - B & B TOWING HH SERVICES INC. 20011683 0159 521. 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 137.00 0.00 137.00 200607 TOWING SERVICE 20011683 161 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 179.00 0.00 179.00 200607 TOWING SERVICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 316.00 CHECK NO 568876 VENDOR 129820 - B & W GOLF CARS, INC 20011647 IVC00000000007050 112 109 - 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 417.59 109. 182901. 641950 -00000 0.00 8.50 0.00 426.09 IVC00000000007050 112 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 426.09 CHECK NO 569209 VENDOR 337770 B &H PHOTO -VIDEO INC. 20011962 72044210 - 7915245 001. 100130 - 652990 -00000 0.00 354.75 0.00 354.75 72044210 - 7915245 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 354.75 CHECK NO 568753 VENDOR 1740 BAKER & TAYLOR CO 20011695 5003459742 12/31 307 - 156110. 766100.00000 0.00 402.90 0.00 402.90 200548 BOOKS 20011695 5003462485 01/03 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 22.00 0.00 22.00 200548 BOOKS 20011695 5003460205 01102 307 - 156110- 766100 -00000 0.00 176.31 0.00 176.31 200548 BOOKS 20011695 5003468729 01/04 307. 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 591.41 0.00 591.41 200548 BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,192.62 CHECK NO 569001 VENDOR 215140 - BAKER & TAYLOR, INC. JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20010387 B46366661 12/14 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20010387 R23004110 12/27 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20010387 M90172260 12/06 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20012237 B40633372 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20010387 G32179920 01/03 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20010387 B46366662 12/14 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20010387 B45417571 12/06 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20010387 B46366663 12/14 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20010387 R22918122 12120 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20010387 G32179921 01/03 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20010387 B46366660 12/14 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20010387 B45417570 12/06 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20010387 B22859650 12/18 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20010387 M90315910 12/17 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20010387 G32111260 12/18 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20010387 R22918121 12/20 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20010387 B47192490 12/24 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 355 - 156190 - 652670.00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 652670 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 652670 -00000 0.00 129 - 156110. 652670 -33774 0.00 355. 156190 - 652670 -00000 0.00 355. 156190- 652670 -00000 0.00 355. 156190- 652670 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 652670 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 652670 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 652670 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 652670 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 652670 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 652670 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190- 652670 -00000 0.00 355. 156190- 652670 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 652670 -00000 0.00 355 - 156190 - 652670 -00000 0.00 16J2AGE 14 AMT NET VCHR DISC 13.98 0.00 94.43 0.00 17.74 17.46 49.61 4.59 69.95 159.19 142.53 10.46 120.29 27.98 85.50 55.97 17.73 492.64 177.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 13.98 94.43 17.74 17.46 49.61 4.59 69.95 159.19 142.53 10.46 120.29 27.98 85.50 55.97 17.73 492.64 177.53 6J2AGE 15 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012237 840633371 7/11/01 129. 156110- 652670 -33774 0.00 155.90 0.00 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS 20010387 M90315911 12/17 355 - 156190 - 652670.00000 0.00 439.07 0.00 201636 VIDEOS /COMPACT DISCS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568843 VENDOR 106210 - BARNES INDUSTRIAL PLASTIC PIPING 20011650 M10008978 1/4 408 - 253211 - 655100.00000 0.00 356.53 0.00 HAYWARD SOLENOID VALVES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569218 VENDOR 339680 BAYER CORPORATION 20011967 0350 6786 1/9 001- 155410 - 652710.00000 0.00 659.32 0.00 0350 6786 1/9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569014 VENDOR 231290 BEACH TECH 20011662 10117011 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 1,736.80 0.00 200608 INVENTORY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568939 VENDOR 173430 BEAUMONT COMMUNICATIONS. INC. 20011672 23902 1/1 101 - 163610 - 634999.00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 201836 QUARTERLY MONITORING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569010 VENDOR 229220 - BERKSHIRE VETERINARY HOSPITAL 20012234 01 -9046 T. MITCHELL 610 - 155410 - 631970.00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 200929 01 -9046 T. MITCHELL 20012234 01 -9049 T. MITCHELL 610 - 155410 - 631970.00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 200929 01.9049 T. MITCHELL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568998 VENDOR 214780 - BERRY'S BARBELL & EQUIPMENT CO. 20011669 239 12/28 111 - 156313 - 646970 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 201448 GG FITNESS CENTER /REPAIRS VCHR NET 155.90 439.07 2.152.55 356.53 356.53 659.32 659.32 1,736.80 1.736.80 75.00 75.00 60.00 45.00 105.00 20.00 6J2AGE 16 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569096 VENDOR 281280 - BERRY, DAY AND MCFEE 20011966 01.1356 MMA REVIEW CASE 681 - 431590- 635700.00000 0.00 250.00 0.00 01 -1356 MMA REVIEW CASE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569284 VENDOR 900050 - BETTE RIES 301134 REFUND - PARKS 111 - 156390- 634999 -00000 0.00 117.00 0.00 DROPPING CLASS PRO-RATED - CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568754 VENDOR 1820 - BETTER BUSINESS FORMS 20011659 1315629 12/31 408 - 210151 - 647110 -00000 0.00 2,397.00 0.00 202620 UTILITY BILL LASER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568755 VENDOR 1910 - BETTER ROADS, INC. 20011959 22491 12/31 111 - 163645 - 653130 -00000 0.00 5,569.61 0.00 201573 ASPHALT 20012187 22349 RETAINAGE RELEASE 313 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 10,440.72 0.00 106663 RETAINAGE RELEASE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569302 VENDOR 900080 - BETTY HOWARD 301142 AMB.REF B.HOWARD 8/18/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 335.00 0.00 AMB.REF B.HOWARD #0027345 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568889 VENDOR 141230 - BIG CYPRESS ANIMAL CLINIC 20012236 01 -9299 M. BOWLSBEY 1/24 610- 155410 - 631970.00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 200932 ADOPTION FEES 20011688 01 -9202 S. BRAWNER 610 - 155410- 631970.00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 200932 1/16 S. BRAWNER 20012232 0069092 12/03 001 - 155410 - 631980 -00000 0.00 52.50 0.00 153386 COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL CARE CHECK NO 569303 VENDOR 900080 - BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN 301146 AMB.REF BLUE CROSS 10/13/ 490 - 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 60.98 0.00 60.98 AMB.REF F.FRANK #0200945 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.98 CHECK NO 569304 VENDOR 900080 - BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NC 301187 AMB.REF BL CROSS 10112101 490. 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 48.76 0.00 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMB.REF J.GAINO #0200898 -1 16J2AGE 17 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 301181 AMB.REF BLUE CROSS9 /28/01 490. 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 48.76 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER AMB.REF J.GAINO #0133852 -1 FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012232 0069009 11/30 001 - 155410 - 631980 -00000 0.00 140.00 0.00 140.00 0.00 153386 COMPREHENSIVE MEDICAL CARE 0.00 111.68 202515 COPY BOND 20012236 01 -7939 M. KING 1/24 610 - 155410 - 631970.00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 0.00 200932 ADOPTION FEES 0.00 456.00 202515 TONER 20012236 02 -9581 G. JOHNSON 1/24 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 0.00 200932 ADOPTION FEES 0.00 428.20 202515 MAINTANCE 20011688 01 -9074 J. BRIGGS 610 - 155410 - 631970.00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 200932 1/16 J. BRIGGS 0.00 995.88 CHECK NO 568756 VENDOR 2270 - BOARD OF CNTY COMMISSIONERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 522.50 CHECK NO 569303 VENDOR 900080 - BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF MICHIGAN 301146 AMB.REF BLUE CROSS 10/13/ 490 - 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 60.98 0.00 60.98 AMB.REF F.FRANK #0200945 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.98 CHECK NO 569304 VENDOR 900080 - BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD OF NC 301187 AMB.REF BL CROSS 10112101 490. 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 48.76 0.00 48.76 AMB.REF J.GAINO #0200898 -1 301181 AMB.REF BLUE CROSS9 /28/01 490. 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 48.76 0.00 48.76 AMB.REF J.GAINO #0133852 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 97.52 CHECK NO 568912 VENDOR 159870 - BLUELINE INC. 20011684 10150527 1/3 113 - 138931 - 651110 -00000 0.00 111.68 0.00 111.68 202515 COPY BOND 20011668 10149901 12110 113 - 138931 - 651110 -00000 0.00 456.00 0.00 456.00 202515 TONER 20011684 10150566 1/4 113 - 138931 - 646710 -00000 0.00 428.20 0.00 428.20 202515 MAINTANCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 995.88 CHECK NO 568756 VENDOR 2270 - BOARD OF CNTY COMMISSIONERS 20012362 PP #9 001 - 000000 - 217210.00000 0.00 2.464.74 001 - 000000 - 217220.00000 0.00 8.138.42 0.00 10,603.16 PP #9 6J2AGE 18 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568757 VENDOR 2310 - BOB DEAN SUPPLY, INC. 20011674 893726 1/7 408 - 233312 - 655200 -00000 0.00 98.55 0.00 202021 METAL & RELATED ITEMS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568880 VENDOR 133300 BOB TAYLOR CHEVROLET 20011697 116318 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 142.14 0.00 203456 PARTS 20011697 116028 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 14.26 0.00 203456 PARTS 20011697 116286 521. 122410- 646425.00000 0.00 41.36 0.00 203456 PARTS 20011697 116036 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 10.06 0.00 203456 PARTS 20011697 116315 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 4.35 0.00 203456 PARTS 20011697 116166 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 149.26 0.00 203456 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568931 VENDOR 168720 BONITA AUTO SUPPLY /NAPA 20011701 565898 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 9.15 0.00 203458 PARTS 20011701 565319 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 141.36 0.00 203458 PARTS 20011689 566738 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 56.41 0.00 203458 PARTS 20011701 565874 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 6.13 0.00 203458 PARTS 20011701 566001 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 2.20 0.00 203458 PARTS 20011701 565634 521 - 122410. 646425.00000 0.00 20.16 0.00 203458 PARTS JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20011701 565882 203458 PARTS 20011701 566520 203458 PARTS 20011701 565611 203458 PARTS 20011701 565410 203458 PARTS 20011689 566803 203458 PARTS 20011701 565412 203458 PARTS 20011701 565977 203458 PARTS 20011701 565629 203458 PARTS 20011701 565528 203458 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 521. 122410- 646425.00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 568758 VENDOR 2560 - BROWN VETERINARY CLINIC 20011680 01 -9260 D. BRAWNER 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 200938 01 -9260 D. BRAWNER CHECK NO 569260 VENDOR 350380 - BRYAN THURSTON- EMPLOYEE 20011648 REIMBURSEMENT EDUC COURSE 113 - 138915 - 654360 -00000 0.00 REIMBURSEMENT EDUC COURSE INTERNET CHECK NO 569127 VENDOR 295300 - BUMPER TO BUMPER 20011703 I271063 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 203457 PARTS 20011702 I270671 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 203457 PARTS 16J2AGE 19 AMT NET VCHR DISC 17.30 0.00 123.68 0.00 21.00 0.00 139.84 0.00 12.16 0.00 4.65 0.00 104.10 0.00 6.13 0.00 17.68 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 65.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 61.01 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 114.33 0.00 16.45 0.00 VCHR NET 17.30 123.68 21.00 139.84 12.16 4.65 104.10 6.13 17.68 681.95 65.00 65.00 61.01 61.01 114.33 16.45 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 20 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011702 I270512 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 16.40 0.00 16.40 203457 PARTS 20011699 I271152 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 28.22 0.00 28.22 203457 PARTS 20011702 I270734 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 10.37 0.00 10.37 203457 PARTS 20011703 I270872 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 0.77 0.00 0.77 203457 PARTS 20011698 I270530 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 7.62 0.00 7.62 201289 FILTERS 20011703 I270935 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 204.52 0.00 204.52 203457 PARTS 20011699 I271108 521 - 122410. 646425.00000 0.00 5.30 0.00 5.30 203457 PARTS 20011703 I270982 521. 122410- 646425.00000 0.00 8.38 0.00 8.38 203457 PARTS 20011703 I271000 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 4.23 0.00 4.23 203457 PARTS 20011703 I270645 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 23.58 0.00 23.58 203457 PARTS 20011698 I270750 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 105.93 0.00 105.93 201289 FILTERS 20011698 I271018 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 1.31 0.00 1.31 201289 FILTERS 20011698 I271070 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 47.75 0.00 47.75 201289 FILTERS 20011699 I271147 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 16.30 0.00 16.30 203457 PARTS 20011698 I270471 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 68.26 0.00 68.26 201289 FILTERS 20011703 I271079 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 62.28 0.00 62.28 203457 PARTS 20011698 I270464 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 192.53 0.00 192.53 201289 FILTERS JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 21 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011699 I271188 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 17.46 0.00 17.46 203457 PARTS 20011703 I270977 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 11.90 0.00 11.90 203457 PARTS 20011702 I270468 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 18.63 0.00 18.63 203457 PARTS 20011703 I270976 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 204.52 0.00 204.52 203457 PARTS 20011702 I270435 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 4.70 0.00 4.70 203457 PARTS 20011702 I270385 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 64.27 0.00 64.27 203457 PARTS 20011703 I270979 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 16.28 0.00 16.28 203457 PARTS 20011703 I270938 521. 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 33.39 0.00 33.39 203457 PARTS 20011699 I271065 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 19.68 0.00 19.68 203457 PARTS 20011702 I270470 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 67.88 0.00 67.88 203457 PARTS 20011702 I270531 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 32.79 0.00 32.79 203457 PARTS 20011699 I270969 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 4.33 0.00 4.33 203457 PARTS 20011702 I270697 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 29.04 0.00 29.04 203457 PARTS 20011699 I271149 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 25.12 0.00 25.12 203457 PARTS 20011702 I270602 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 13.15 0.00 13.15 203457 PARTS 20011702 I270514 521. 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 28.88 0.00 28.88 203457 PARTS 20011702 I270649 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 69.35 0.00 69.35 203457 PARTS JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 22 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011699 1271110 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 5.30 0.00 5.30 203457 PARTS 20011703 1270835 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 1.91 0.00 1.91 203457 PARTS 20011702 1270698 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 4.04 0.00 4.04 203457 PARTS 20011703 1270980 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 29.51 0.00 29.51 203457 PARTS 20011698 1270968 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 25.30 0.00 25.30 201289 FILTERS 20011698 1271046 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 22.41 0.00 22.41 201289 FILTERS 20011703 1270939 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 12.49 0.00 12.49 203457 PARTS 20011698 1271003 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 4.55 0.00 4.55 201289 FILTERS 20011702 C23855 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 44.00- 0.00 44.00- 203457 PARTS 20011703 1270970 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 1.89 0.00 1.89 203457 PARTS 20011702 1270521 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 27.33 0.00 27.33 203457 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.686.63 CHECK NO 569212 VENDOR 338610 BURNS VETERINARY SUPPLY 20012233 5333169 1/15 001 - 155410. 652720.00000 0.00 67.20 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 116.30 0.00 183.50 OINTMENT /VIALS 20011652 5327086 1/4 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 75.27 0.00 75.27 1/4 SUPPLIES 20011654 6020729 1/3 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 77.34 0.00 77.34 LUBRICANT / SCRUB 20011653 5327097 1/4 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 24.95 0.00 24.95 BENZ -ALL TINT 6J2AGE 23 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568759 VENDOR 2620 BUSINESS MACHINE SALES 20011645 29479 11/26 001 - 122255 - 646970 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 29479 11/26 20011970 053847 1/7 313. 163611- 644620 -00000 0.00 72.00 0.00 053847 1/7 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569008 VENDOR 226960 BUSINESS REFERENCE SERVICES 20011644 0107481 -02 1/1 355. 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 1,319.00 0.00 203844 INTL BUS DIR /REG BUS DIR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569265 VENDOR 350470 - BUTZEL LONG ATTORNEYS AND JEREMY 20012285 D/P J STONE #67958752524 191 - 138785. 884100 -33751 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 D/P J STONE #67958752524 204030 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568892 VENDOR 146050 - C & H DISTRIBUTORS INC. 20012002 428466001 408 - 233352. 652990 -00000 0.00 74.48 0.00 202553 REPAIRS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569012 VENDOR 230790 - C.E.D. INC. 20011991 4977 - 357223 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 280.00 0.00 201239 SUPPLIES 20011990 4977. 320182 101 - 163630 - 634999 -00000 0.00 220.00 0.00 200022 SUPPLIES 20011991 4977. 320063 001- 122240 - 652993 -00000 0.00 96.00 0.00 201239 SUPPLIES 20011991 4977. 357194 001- 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 9.50 0.00 201239 SUPPLIES 20011990 4977. 357256 101 - 163630 - 634999 -00000 0.00 471.50 0.00 200022 SUPPLIES 6J2AGE 24 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012008 4977 - 357101 778 - 182701. 652990 -00000 0.00 94.23 0.00 200081 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 20011991 4977 - 320481 001 - 122240 - 652991 -00000 0.00 8.33 0.00 201239 SUPPLIES 20012007 4977. 320211 101 - 163630 - 634999.00000 0.00 505.46 0.00 200022 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568749 VENDOR 900140 CAL HENDERSON 301102 B.MACNICOL 01 -1602 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 33.61 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568760 VENDOR 2860 CAPRI LAWN & GARDEN EQUIP 20011629 077515 495 - 192350 - 646410 -00000 0.00 225.70 0.00 153226 REPAIR MOWER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569258 VENDOR 350280 CAROLYNE COLE 20012412 TRAVEL 1/11 -25/02 COLE 198 - 157440 - 640200 -00000 0.00 99.79 0.00 C COLE 1/11 -25/02 TRAVEL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568986 VENDOR 201920 - CARTER FENCE COMPANY INC. 20011633 9097 111 - 156332 - 634999.00000 0.00 259.00 0.00 152301 INSTALL FENCING 20011974 9096 001. 156363 - 646317.00000 0.00 1,669.00 0.00 202090 INSTALLATION 20011975 9072 408 - 253211. 634999 -00000 0.00 1,775.00 0.00 202853 INSTALLATION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568944 VENDOR 174780 - CARUS CHEMICAL CO. 20012429 10020792 408 - 253211. 652310 -00000 0.00 5,179.55 0.00 202566 CHEMICALS 6J2AGE 25 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012429 10021272 408. 253211- 652310 -00000 0.00 5.179.55 0.00 202566 CHEMICALS 20012429 10021306 408 - 253211 - 652310 -00000 0.00 2.103.57 0.00 202566 CHEMICALS 20012429 10021382 408- 253211 - 652310 -00000 0.00 5,179.55 0.00 202566 CHEMICALS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569184 VENDOR 328170 - CCE COALITION 20011910 MEM DUES CCE COALITION 123 - 155975. 654210 -33075 0.00 300.00 0.00 152912 2002 MEMBERSHIP DUES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568978 VENDOR 196910 CECIL'S COPY EXPRESS 20011912 12466 495 - 192310 - 647110 -00000 0.00 266.55 0.00 153294 COPIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569285 VENDOR 900050 CELERITY CONSTRUCTION INC 301101 REF 309790 CELERITY 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 10.60 0.00 REF 309790 CELERITY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569067 VENDOR 261700 CENTEX HOMES 20011891 REF 309959 CENTEX 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 10.60 0.00 REF 309959 CENTEX CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569223 VENDOR 343050 CENTRAL FLORIDA MULCHES 20011982 2878 109 - 182901 - 646314 -00000 0.00 2,448.00 0.00 200082 PINE STRAWS BALES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569179 VENDOR 326390 - CGLOBE 20012397 00075 472 - 173430 - 648160 -33821 0.00 130.00 0.00 152991 REDESIGN 6J2AGE 26 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012398 00074 470 - 173463 - 634999 -00000 0.00 260.00 0.00 152127 MAINTENACE AGREEMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569305 VENDOR 900080 - CHARLES H. ROSSBACH 301188 C.RSSBCH 0126535 -1AMB REF 490 - 000000- 116004.00000 0.00 268.00 0.00 C.ROSSBACH 0126535.1 AMB REF CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569306 VENDOR 900080 - CHARLES H.ROSSBACH 301141 AMB.REF C.ROSSBACH 7/1/01 490 - 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 268.00 0.00 AMB.REF C.ROSSBACH #0126535.1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569307 VENDOR 900080 - CHARLES J.HULL 301180 AMB.REF C.HULL 10 /10 /01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 47.34 0.00 AMB.REF C.HULL #0200708 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569308 VENDOR 900080 - CHARLES K.RIEGER 301169 AMB.REF C.RIEGER 3/9/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 59.81 0.00 AMB.REF C.RIEGER #0115818 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569230 VENDOR 344770 - CHARLES TOWNS 20011914 INSTRUCTOR 130- 157710 - 634999.00000 0.00 171.00 0.00 201065 BASKETBALL INST CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568903 VENDOR 155420 - CHARLIE'S AUTO GLASS AT NAPLES 20011998 3407 521 - 122410- 646415 -00000 0.00 2.56- 0.00 200848 DISCOUNT 20011998 3407 521 - 122410- 646415 -00000 0.00 127.83 0.00 200848 AUTO GLASS 20011997 3430 521. 122410- 646415 -00000 0.00 5.13- 0.00 200848 DISCOUNT 6J2AGE 27 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20011997 3430 521 - 122410 - 646415.00000 0.00 256.08 0.00 200848 AUTO GLASS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568924 VENDOR 165950 - CHECKPOINT, LTD. 20011976 I16367 001 - 122240 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,700.00 0.00 203413 INSTALLATION 20011637 55563 198. 157410 - 634999 -00000 0.00 80.00 0.00 152793 LABOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568969 VENDOR 193460 CHEMICAL LIME COMPANY 20012183 00133802 408 - 253211.652310 -00000 0.00 5,807.01 0.00 202567 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568888 VENDOR 140340 CHEVRON USA 20011634 789.869.276 -4 001. 144510.652410 -00000 0.00 150.25 0.00 152926 FUEL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568977 VENDOR 196680 CHIVERS AUDIO BOOKS 20012005 217203 355 - 156190 - 652670 -00000 0.00 349.35 0.00 201639 BOOKS 20012005 216853 355.156190- 652670 -00000 0.00 26.00 0.00 201639 BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569244 VENDOR 347760 CHOICEPOINT PUBLIC RECORDS, INC 20011909 B.MACNICOL 01- 001602 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 123.00 0.00 B. MACNICOL 01- 001602 20011909 R. KIPP 00- 001216 681 - 421190 - 634401.00000 0.00 88.00 0.00 R. KIPP 00- 001216 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569168 VENDOR 320880 CHRIS OBERG JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 28 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012225 1/2 -25 TRVL C OBERG 111 - 156310 - 640200.00000 0.00 42.63 0.00 42.63 1/2 -25 TRVL C OBERG CHECK TOTAL 0.00 42.63 CHECK NO 569160 VENDOR 317320 - CITY MATTRESS 20012003 61197002 490. 144610. 652990 -00000 0.00 440.00 0.00 440.00 203589 MATTRESS& BOXSPRING 20012396 61189702 490 - 144610 - 652990 -00000 0.00 110.00 0.00 110.00 151731 BOX SPRING 20012396 61189685 490. 144610- 652990 -00000 0.00 220.00 0.00 220.00 151731 MATTRESS SET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 770.00 CHECK NO 568761 VENDOR 3360 CITY OF EVERGLADES 20011908 337 11/25 495 - 192350. 643400 -00000 0.00 38.84 0.00 38.84 200262 337 11/25 20011908 338 11/25 495 - 192350 - 643400 -00000 0.00 35.32 0.00 35.32 200262 338 11/25 20011908 339 11/25 495 - 192350 - 643400 -00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 200262 339 11/25 20012001 339 12/25 495. 192350 - 643400 -00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 200262 339 12/25 20012004 176 12/25 198 - 157430 - 643400 -00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 176 12/25 20012001 337 12/25 495 - 192350. 643400 -00000 0.00 39.48 0.00 39.48 200262 337 12/25 20012001 338 12/25 495 - 192350 - 643400 -00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 200262 338 12/25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 253.64 CHECK NO 568762 VENDOR 3390 CITY OF NAPLES 20011986 3165 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 5,417.06 0.00 5,417.06 200958 FUEL CHARGES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,417.06 6J2AGE 29 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 568932 VENDOR 168900 - CITY OF NAPLES 20011614 COLLECTIONS W/E 1/18/02 408. 000000- 208750 -00000 0.00 8,985.93 408. 000000- 208751 -00000 0.00 2,208.52 408. 000000- 208764 -00000 0.00 895.45 0.00 COLLECTIONS W/E 1/18/02 20012266 COLLECTIONS W/E 1/25/02 408. 000000- 208750 -00000 0.00 10,665.30 408. 000000- 208751 -00000 0.00 2,485.48 408. 000000 - 208764 -00000 0.00 863.96 0.00 COLLECTIONS W/E 1/25/02 20011973 LOCKBOX W/E 1/11/02 408 - 000000 - 208750 -00000 0.00 14,527.32 408 - 000000- 208751 -00000 0.00 3.605.38 408 - 000000 - 208764 -00000 0.00 16.49 0.00 LOCKBOX W/E 1111102 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568909 VENDOR 158740 CLERK OF COURTS 20011915 257146/758911/4120 408 - 210151 - 634999 -00000 0.00 407.88 0.00 201106 LOOMIS FARGO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568742 VENDOR 166520 CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 20011916 E. CISNEROS 01.1461 681 - 421190. 651210 -00000 0.00 2.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568743 VENDOR 166520 CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 20011917 D. ROSS 01 -1817 681- 421190 - 651210 -00000 0.00 2.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568744 VENDOR 166520 CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 20011918 D. ROSS 01 -1818 681 - 421190 - 651210.00000 0.00 2.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568745 VENDOR 166520 CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 20012184 R. EVANS 331 - 163650- 761100.60071 0.00 8,835.00 0.00 AND JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 569135 VENDOR 305220 - CLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA 20011983 C.CORRAL 12/4 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 202889 C.CORRAL 12/4 0.00 20011983 C.CORRAL 11 /1 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 202889 C. CORRAL 11 /1 0.00 20011983 J. AMADY 12/13 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 202889 J. AMADY 12/13 20011983 J. AMADY 10/6 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 203889 J.AMADY 10/6 20011983 C.CORRAL 12110 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 203889 C. CORRAL 12110 20011983 J.AMADY 10/5 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 203899 J.AMADY 10/5 20011983 J. AMADY 10/6 001. 155930. 631210 -00000 202889 J.AMADY 10/6 20011983 J. AMADY 10/6 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 J. AMADY 10/6 20011983 C. CORRAL 12/4 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 203889 C.CORRAL 12/4 20011983 J.AMADY 10/6 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 203889 J. AMADY 10/6 CHECK NO 569143 VENDOR 311040 - CLIPPER TAGS 20011911 7978 113 - 138931 - 651110 -00000 153199 SUPPLIES CHECK NO 568885 VENDOR 136290 - CLIPPING BUREAU OF FLORIDA 20011996 97283 001- 100130 - 652990.00000 200196 NEWSLETTER 16J2AGE 30 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 26.65 0.00 715.00 0.00 224.25 0.00 67.60 0.00 45.50 0.00 55.90 0.00 663.00 0.00 312.00 0.00 1,270.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 109.85 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 162.86 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 8,835.00 195.00 26.65 715.00 224.25 67.60 45.50 55.90 663.00 312.00 1,270.75 3,575.65 109.85 109.85 162.86 162.86 ri 6J2AGE 31 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 568954 VENDOR 182370 - COASTAL APPRAISAL SERVICES 20011985 29255 313. 163673 - 631600 -63041 0.00 600.00 0.00 803849 PROF SERVICES 20011985 29254 313 - 163673 - 631600 -63041 0.00 437.50 0.00 803849 PROF SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568763 VENDOR 3570 - COASTAL COURIER 20012180 4343 001 - 010110 - 641950 -00000 0.00 15.00 0.00 200299 COURIER SERVICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569269 VENDOR 350590 COLLECTION SERVICES CENTER 20012378 PP #9 001 - 000000- 218810 -00000 0.00 316.24 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569201 VENDOR 332890 COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, 20011615 0821 111. 156332- 649035 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 153167 CITATION EXCESSIVE ALARMS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569052 VENDOR 257590 COLLIER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT 20011977 FLU VACCINE 12/5/01 517 - 121640. 649990 -00000 0.00 2,886.00 0.00 203960 FLU VACCINES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569003 VENDOR 218570 COLLIER COUNTY OVERALL EXTENSION 20012059 2/12.14 REGIST. 408- 210111 - 640300 -00000 0.00 20.00 408 - 210105 - 640300 -00000 0.00 20.00 408 - 210155 - 640300 -00000 0.00 20.00 408 - 210125 - 640300 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 152243 MGMT WORKSHOP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568739 VENDOR 8050 COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012283 20020046 TAGS & TITLE AND COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 470 - 173435. 649010 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 568740 VENDOR 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 20012284 20020062 TAGS $ TITLE 470 - 173410 - 649010.00000 0.00 AND CHECK NO 568738 VENDOR 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 20012282 20020045 TAGS & TITLE 470. 173435 - 649010 -00000 0.00 AND CHECK NO 568789 VENDOR 8050 - COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 20012192 ADVALOREM REFUNDS 001 - 013010 - 983000 -00000 0.00 0.00 137.96 4.61 111 - 163646 - 983000 -00000 0.00 4.48 0.00 4.48 111 - 013010 - 983000 -00000 0.00 4.61 206 - 939030- 983000 -00000 0.00 114. 178975 - 983000 -00000 0.00 141. 112555- 983000 -00000 0.00 473. 173411 - 983000 -00000 0.00 AD VALOREM REFUNDS 20012192 ADVALOREM REFUNDS 410 - 000000. 121200 -00000 0.00 AD VALOREM REFUNDS CHECK NO 568773 VENDOR 3690 - COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY BILLING 20011932 07202022000 11/21 -12/19 152 - 162541 - 643400 -00000 0.00 07202022000 11/21 -12/19 20011927 06102282300 11/16 -12/18 001 - 061010. 643400 -00000 0.00 06102282300 11/16 -12/18 20011933 02700305800 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253.00000 0.00 02700305800 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700311800 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 02700311800 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700304900 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901. 634253 -00000 0.00 02700304900 11/28 -12/28 16J2AGE 32 AMT NET VCHR DISC 52.85 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 52.85 CHECK TOTAL 52.85 CHECK TOTAL 12.658.57 951.31 2.384.93 155.36 146.30 401.60 721.79 371.03 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 52.85 52.85 52.85 52.85 52.85 52.85 17,419.86 371.03 17,790.89 20.12 0.00 20.12 137.96 0.00 137.96 4.61 0.00 4.61 4.48 0.00 4.48 4.61 0.00 4.61 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 33 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011932 07215951100 11/21 -12/19 152 - 162541. 643400.00000 0.00 415.79 0.00 415.79 07215951100 11/21.12/19 20011929 03901644700 11/30 -1/3 001 - 156363 - 643400 -00000 0.00 62.80 0.00 62.80 03901644700 11/30 -1/3 20011933 02700605500 11/29 -12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253.00000 0.00 45.90 0.00 45.90 02700605500 11/29 -12/28 20011933 02700703500 11/28.12/27 109. 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 43.50 0.00 43.50 02700703500 11/28 -12/27 20011933 02700504500 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 5.52 0.00 5.52 2700504500 11/28 -12/27 20011933 02700100400 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 4.87 0.00 4.87 02700100400 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700300901 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901. 634253 -00000 0.00 67.81 0.00 67.81 02700300901 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700301900 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 4.48 0.00 4.48 02700301900 11/28.12/28 20011933 02700101000 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901- 634253 -00000 0.00 69.24 0.00 69.24 02700101000 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700121200 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253.00000 0.00 117.03 0.00 117.03 02700121200 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700413600 11/29.12/28 109. 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 113.83 0.00 113.83 02700413600 11/29 -12/28 20011933 02700709300 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 5.26 0.00 5.26 02700709300 11/28 -12/27 20011933 02700412600 11/29.12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 106.29 0.00 106.29 02700412600 11/29 -12/28 20011932 07201961700 11/20 -12/21 152. 162541- 643400 -00000 0.00 60.72 0.00 60.72 07201961700 11/20 -12/21 20011929 03901641100 11/30 -1/3 001 - 156363 - 643400 -00000 0.00 135.35 0.00 135.35 03901641100 11/30 -1/3 20011928 07201452300 11/20 -12/21 152 - 162541 - 643400 -00000 0.00 641.12 0.00 641.12 07201452300 11/20 -12/21 20011933 02700700200 11/28.12/27 109 - 182901- 634253 -00000 0.00 43.50 0.00 43.50 02700700200 11/28 -12/27 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 34 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011933 02700502600 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253.00000 0.00 5.39 0.00 5.39 02700502600 11/28 -12/27 20011926 05418830500 11/14 -12/13 001. 155410 - 643400 -00000 0.00 890.40 0.00 890.40 05418830500 11/14 -12/13 20011933 02700501000 11/28.12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 5.52 0.00 5.52 02700501000 11/28.12/27 20011933 02700307300 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901- 634253.00000 0.00 4.61 0.00 4.61 02700307300 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700309200 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253.00000 0.00 4.35 0.00 4.35 02700309200 11/28 -12/28 20011932 02729541300 11/29 -12/28 111 - 163646 - 643400 -00000 0.00 99.45 0.00 99.45 02729541300 11/29 -12/28 20011929 02700300402 11/28 -12/28 111 - 156332 - 643400 -00000 0.00 49.74 0.00 49.74 02700300402 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700216700 11/28.12/28 109 - 182901. 634253 -00000 0.00 86.40 0.00 86.40 02700216700 11/28.12/28 20011929 02700300502 11/28 -12/28 111 - 156332 - 643400 -00000 0.00 305.30 0.00 305.30 02700300502 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700700900 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253.00000 0.00 43.50 0.00 43.50 02700700900 11/28 -12/27 20011929 06307653500 11/20 -12/19 001 - 156363 - 643400 -00000 0.00 187.23 0.00 187.23 06307653500 11/20 -12/19 20011929 02714573200 11/28 -12/28 001 - 156363. 643400 -00000 0.00 115.08 0.00 115.08 02714573200 11/28 -12/28 20011872 04810397300 12/7.1/10 111 - 156332. 643400 -00000 0.00 485.28 0.00 485.28 04810397300 12/7.1/10 20011933 02700413100 11/29 -12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 58.58 0.00 58.58 02700413100 11/29.12/28 20011933 02700300300 11/28.12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 96.80 0.00 96.80 02700300300 11/28.12/28 20011933 02700715300 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 5.39 0.00 5.39 02700715300 11/28 -12/27 20011925 03600100500 11/30 -1.3 001 - 156170. 643400.00000 0.00 186.30 0.00 186.30 03600100500 11/30.1/3 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 35 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011933 02700316100 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901- 634253.00000 0.00 4.35 0.00 4.35 02700316100 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700614800 11/29 -12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 48.18 0.00 48.18 02700614800 11/29.12/27 20011933 02700312900 11/28 -12/28 109. 182901- 634253.00000 0.00 4.61 0.00 4.61 02700312900 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02702336301 11/29 -12/28 109 - 182901. 634253 -00000 0.00 18.57 0.00 18.57 02702336301 11/29 -12/28 20011933 02700100800 11/28.12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 99.53 0.00 99.53 02700100800 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700411300 11/29 -12/29 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 54.16 0.00 54.16 02700411300 11/29 -12/29 20011933 02700615100 11/29 -12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 105.25 0.00 105.25 02700615100 11/29.12/27 20011933 02700413800 11/29 -12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253.00000 0.00 82.37 0.00 82.37 02700413800 11/29 -12/28 20011932 07818978101 11/21 -12/20 111 - 163646.643400.00000 0.00 148.17 0.00 148.17 07818978101 11/21 -12/20 20011929 03904895300 12/3 -1/4 001 - 156363 - 643400 -00000 0.00 109.44 0.00 109.44 03904895300 12/3 -1/4 20011924 02700101300 11/28 -12/28 111 - 163646. 643400 -00000 0.00 47.92 0.00 47.92 02700101300 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700308600 11/28 -12/28 109. 182901- 634253 -00000 0.00 5.39 0.00 5.39 02700308600 11/28 -12/28 20011923 07801284200 10/24 -11/26 144 - 144360 - 643400 -00000 0.00 35.52 0.00 35.52 07801284200 10/24 -11/26 20011929 03900149600 12/3 -1/4 001 - 156363 - 643400 -00000 0.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 03900149600 12/3 -1/4 20011929 0360100801 11/30 -1/3 111 - 156332 - 643400 -00000 0.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 0360100801 11/30 -1/3 20011933 02700704100 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901. 634253.00000 0.00 5.39 0.00 5.39 02700704100 11/28 -12/27 20011933 02700716800 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 127.22 0.00 127.22 02700716800 11/28 -12/27 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 36 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011933 02700201200 11/29 -12/29 109 - 182901 - 634253.00000 0.00 52.73 0.00 52.73 02700201200 11/29 -12/29 20011933 02700304500 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253.00000 0.00 45.97 0.00 45.97 02700304500 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700305500 11/28.12/28 109 - 182901- 634253 -00000 0.00 51.30 0.00 51.30 02700305500 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02701074300 11/29.12/28 109- 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 43.50 0.00 43.50 02701074300 11/29.12/28 20011933 02700302000 11/28.12/28 109 - 182901- 634253 -00000 0.00 54.55 0.00 54.55 02700302000 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700716400 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 5.78 0.00 5.78 02700716400 11/28 -12/27 20011933 02700507100 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901- 634253 -00000 0.00 4.74 0.00 4.74 02700507100 11/28 -12/27 20011933 02700307000 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253.00000 0.00 6.56 0.00 6.56 02700307000 11/28 -12/28 20011932 07818978801 11/21 -12/20 111 - 163646 - 643400.00000 0.00 359.29 0.00 359.29 07818978801 11/21 -12/20 20011933 02700706600 11/28 -12/27 109- 182901- 634253 -00000 0.00 5.65 0.00 5.65 02700706600 11/28.12/27 20011933 02700313800 11/28.12128 109. 182901- 634253 -00000 0.00 57.54 0.00 57.54 02700313800 11/28.12/28 20011933 02700503800 11/28 -12/27 109. 182901 - 634253.00000 0.00 5.91 0.00 5.91 02700503800 11/28 -12/27 20011933 02700708600 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 6.30 0.00 6.30 02700708600 11/28 -12/27 20011929 03901643700 11/30 -1/3 001 - 156363 - 643400 -00000 0.00 62.80 0.00 62.80 03901643700 11/30 -1/3 20011933 02700705700 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 4.35 0.00 4.35 02700705700 11/28 -12/27 20011929 03600100901 11/30 -1/3 111 - 156332 - 643400 -00000 0.00 720.90 0.00 720.90 03600100901 11/30 -1/3 20011933 02700700500 11/28.12/27 109 - 182901- 634253 -00000 0.00 87.00 0.00 87.00 02700700500 11/28 -12/27 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 2AGE 37 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011872 04803311500 12/10.1/10 111. 156332 - 643400 -00000 0.00 62.72 0.00 62.72 04803311500 12/10.1/10 20011929 03600297000 12/3 -1/3 001 - 156363 - 643400.00000 0.00 285.48 0.00 285.48 03600297000 12/3 -1/3 20011933 02700100100 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901. 634253 -00000 0.00 12.07 0.00 12.07 02700100100 11/28 -12/28 20011931 07202279600 11/20 -12/21 408 - 233352 - 643400 -00000 0.00 1.131.45 0.00 1,131.45 07202279600 11/20 -12/21 20011933 02700500100 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 5.91 0.00 5.91 02700500100 11/28 -12/27 20011933 02700303900 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 5.39 0.00 5.39 02700303900 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700703700 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901. 634253 -00000 0.00 43.50 0.00 43.50 02700703700 11/28 -12/27 20011933 02700306500 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901- 634253 -00000 0.00 4.74 0.00 4.74 02700306500 11/28.12/28 20011872 04833302500 12/10 -1 /10 111. 156332 - 643400 -00000 0.00 207.00 0.00 207.00 04833302500 12/10 -1 /10 20011933 02700120300 11/28 -12/28 109- 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 76.78 0.00 76.78 02700120300 11/28 -12/28 20011929 03901641200 11/30 -1/3 001 - 156363. 643400 -00000 0.00 54.15 0.00 54.15 03901641200 11/30 -1/3 20011929 03600296900 12/3 -1/3 001 - 156363 - 643400 -00000 0.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 03600296900 12/3 -1/3 20011933 02700301200 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 86.79 0.00 86.79 02700301200 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700100600 11//28 -12/28 109. 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 48.44 0.00 48.44 02700100600 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700703800 11/28 -12/27 109. 182901- 634253 -00000 0.00 64.56 0.00 64.56 02700703800 11/28 -12/27 20011933 02700605600 11/29.12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 64.30 0.00 64.30 02700605600 11/29.12/27 20011929 03900160900 11/30 -1/3 001 - 156363. 643400.00000 0.00 29.00 0.00 29.00 03900160900 11/30 -1/3 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 38 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011933 02700711000 11/28 -12/27 109. 182901- 634253.00000 0.00 5.26 0.00 5.26 02700711000 11/28 -12/27 20011929 03901644200 11/30.1/3 001 - 156363 - 643400 -00000 0.00 28.20 0.00 28.20 03901644200 11/30.1/3 20011872 04502681700 12/5 -1/7 111 - 156332. 643400 -00000 0.00 166.46 0.00 166.46 04502681700 12/5.1/7 20011933 02700308100 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 64.69 0.00 64.69 02700308100 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700700100 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253.00000 0.00 48.05 0.00 48.05 02700700100 11/28 -12/27 20011929 03902720800 12/3 -1/4 001 - 156363 - 643400 -00000 0.00 196.88 0.00 196.88 03902720800 12/3 -1/4 20011933 02700605700 11/29 -12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253.00000 0.00 97.58 0.00 97.58 02700605700 11/29 -12/27 20011933 02700512800 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901- 634253 -00000 0.00 15.06 0.00 15.06 02700512800 11/28 -12/27 20011933 02700711600 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 5.13 0.00 5.13 02700711600 11/28 -12/27 20011872 04500642900 12/5 -1/7 111 - 156332 - 643400 -00000 0.00 228.50 0.00 228.50 04500642900 12/5 -1/7 20011933 02700700700 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 108.37 0.00 108.37 02700700700 11/28 -12/27 20011929 07511796700 11/21 -12/21 111. 156332 - 643400.00000 0.00 412.12 0.00 412.12 07511796700 11/21 -12/21 20011932 07201385900 11/20 -12/21 152 - 162541. 643400 -00000 0.00 119.11 0.00 119.11 07201385900 11/20 -12/21 20011933 02700715900 11/28 -12/27 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 02700715900 11/28 -12/27 20011928 07202178400 11/20 -12/21 152 - 162541 - 643400 -00000 0.00 399.55 0.00 399.55 07202178400 11/20 -12/21 20011930 03610634100 11/30 -1/3 111. 156332- 643400 -00000 0.00 1,981.26 0.00 1,981.26 03610634100 11/30 -1/3 20011933 02700310500 11/28 -12/28 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 4.48 0.00 4.48 02700310500 11/28 -12/28 JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012000 07202279700 11/20 -12/21 07202279700 11/20 -12/21 20011933 02700302300 11/28 -12/28 02700302300 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700303000 11/28 -12/28 02700303000 11/28 -12/28 20011933 02700100300 11/28 -12/28 02700100300 11/28 -12/28 20011933 027004135000 11129 -12/28 027004135000 11/29 -12/28 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408- 233352. 643400 -00000 0.00 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 109 - 182901 - 634253.00000 0.00 109 - 182901 - 634253.00000 0.00 109 - 182901 - 634253 -00000 0.00 16J2AGE 39 AMT NET VCHR DISC 90.60 0.00 94.46 0.00 4.87 0.00 4.74 0.00 70.02 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569009 VENDOR 227020 COLLIER TIRE & AUTO REPAIR 20011871 073896 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 197.59 0.00 200623 SUPPLIES 20011871 073895 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 957.80 0.00 200623 SUPPLIES 20011871 073879 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 107.76 0.00 200623 SUPPLIES 20011993 73878 521 - 122410 - 646415.00000 0.00 17.00 0.00 200621 SUPPLIES 20011993 73850 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 53.00 0.00 200621 SUPPLIES 20011992 73811 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 36.00 0.00 200621 SUPPLIES 20011993 73874 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 193.00 0.00 200621 SUPPLIES 20011871 073892 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 822.60 0.00 200623 SUPPLIES 20011871 073812 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 374.28 0.00 200623 SUPPLIES 20011993 73874 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 29.70 0.00 200621 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 90.60 94.46 4.87 4.74 70.02 13,607.72 197.59 957.80 107.76 17.00 53.00 36.00 193.00 822.60 374.28 29.70 2,788.73 6J2AGE 40 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 569020 VENDOR 235530 - COLOR TEC COPY CENTER 20011994 5132 111 - 156349 - 651210 -00000 0.00 226.67 0.00 202547 COPIES 20012009 5234 113. 138312 - 647110 -00000 0.00 115.26 0.00 200440 COPIES 20012009 5192 113 - 138312 - 647110 -00000 0.00 157.48 0.00 200440 COPIES 20011995 5227 408 - 233313 - 647110.00000 0.00 118.52 0.00 200645 COPIES 20011999 5236 113 - 138930 - 647110 -00000 0.00 48.00 0.00 200273 COPIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569092 VENDOR 279050 COLORTECH 20011913 CPIES & BOOKS BOUNDED 325.172972- 647110.31212 0.00 156.11 0.00 152485 BOUNDED CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568774 VENDOR 4020 COMBS OIL CO 20011632 16494 001- 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 52.40 0.00 151603 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568862 VENDOR 115280 COMMERCIAL LAND MAINTENANCE 20012010 994764 111 - 163646.634999.00000 0.00 131.04 0.00 200833 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569068 VENDOR 263070 COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 20011980 426196 001 - 122240 - 764210 -00000 0.00 4,270.50 0.00 201223 SUPPLIES 20011636 425814 408 - 233352 - 646610 -00000 0.00 24.30 0.00 151436 METAL BELT CLIP 20012182 426195 101 - 163630 - 764210 -00000 0.00 6,082.50 0.00 201397 SUPPLIES ri 6J2AGE 41 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20011979 426101 001 - 122240. 646610 -00000 0.00 1,235.00 0.00 201255 SUPPLIES 20011631 426046 001 - 122240. 646610 -00000 0.00 185.00 0.00 150829 SECURITY SUPPLIES 20011978 426193 101 - 163610 - 652910.00000 0.00 1,620.00 0.00 203567 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569343 VENDOR 900140 CONFIDENTIAL COPYING 301115 M 7A SCHANNON 00 -0516 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 82.15 0.00 M&A SCHANNON 00 -0516 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569259 VENDOR 350360 CONGRESSMAN PORTER GOSS 20011635 10 /10 /01 FLAGS 001 - 155230 - 651110.00000 0.00 91.08 0.00 153212 FLAGS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569309 VENDOR 900080 - CONNIE J.CAHILL 301161 AMB.REF.C.CAHILL 10/13/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 305.00 0.00 AMB.REF.C.CAHILL #0200960 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569310 VENDOR 900080 - CONSECO DIRECT LIFE 301151 AMB.REF CONSECO 10 /11 /01 490- 000000 - 116004.00000 0.00 60.98 0.00 AMB.REF D.HORN #0200785.1 301189 AMB REF D.HORN 0200785.1 490 - 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 60.98 0.00 D. HORN AMB REF 0200785 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569097 VENDOR 281620 - CONSOLIDATED POWER SERVICES, INC. 20011984 210814 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,720.00 0.00 200204 SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569030 VENDOR 246200 - CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20011981 682926 201978 SUPPLIES 20011981 683242 201978 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 313 - 163673. 763100 -66066 0.00 313 - 163673. 763100 -66066 0.00 CHECK NO 569134 VENDOR 304900 - CONTEMPORARY CONTROLS & 20011630 3458 111 - 163646 - 646311 -00000 153190 LEV PROT MODULE CHECK NO 569011 VENDOR 230460 - CORPORATE EXPRESS 20011616 28695839 001- 155410 - 651110 -00000 962.02 203275 SUPPLIES 001. 157110- 652990 -00000 20011898 28518705 101 - 163610 - 651110.00000 20011624 203459 SUPPLIES 101 - 163630- 651110.00000 20011616 28844065 001 - 155410. 651110 -00000 20011899 203275 SUPPLIES 113 - 138312 - 651110 -00000 20011616 28695845 001 - 155410. 651110 -00000 20011626 203275 SUPPLIES 408 - 253212 - 651110 -00000 20011897 28487234 313 - 162111- 651110 -00000 20011895 203460 SUPPLIES 001. 100130- 651110 -00000 CHECK NO 569088 VENDOR 276650 - CORPORATE EXPRESS 20011627 28737730 001. 157110 - 651110.00000 962.02 0.00 001. 157110- 652990 -00000 CHECK TOTAL 203327 SUPPLIES 1,098.02 20011624 28518697 101 - 163630- 651110.00000 62.14 203306 SUPPLIES 31.74 20011899 28695847 113 - 138312 - 651110 -00000 5.04 203449 SUPPLIES 5.04 20011626 28666471 408 - 253212 - 651110 -00000 20.20 203322 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 20011895 28666477 001. 100130- 651110 -00000 98.93 203616 SUPPLIES 16J2AGE 42 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 136.00 0.00 136.00 962.02 0.00 962.02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,098.02 0.00 167.88 0.00 167.88 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 167.88 0.00 30.24 0.00 30.24 0.00 62.14 0.00 62.14 0.00 31.74 0.00 31.74 0.00 5.04 0.00 5.04 0.00 20.20 0.00 20.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 149.36 0.00 98.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 98.93 0.00 136.87 0.00 136.87 0.00 8.84 0.00 8.84 0.00 87.25 0.00 87.25 0.00 22.69 0.00 22.69 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 43 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011625 28518690 001 - 121810. 651110.00000 0.00 117.56 0.00 117.56 203314 SUPPLIES 20011625 28453727 001 - 121810 - 651110 -00000 0.00 15.12 0.00 15.12 203314 SUPPLIES 20011907 28738621 001. 156110- 651110.00000 0.00 557.69 0.00 557.69 203539 SUPPLIES 20011624 28844033 101 - 163630- 651110 -00000 0.00 11.20 0.00 11.20 203306 SUPPLIES 20011623 28349072 126 - 138332 - 651110 -33202 0.00 298.73 0.00 298.73 203299 SUPPLIES /CR 20011618 28666521 408 - 210105. 651110 -00000 0.00 27.05 0.00 27.05 203288 SUPPLIES 20011623 28453668 126 - 138332 - 651110 -33202 0.00 56.13 0.00 56.13 203299 SUPPLIES /CR 20011624 28390471 101 - 163630 - 651110.00000 0.00 56.74 0.00 56.74 203306 SUPPLIES 20011907 28828475 001 - 156110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 14.69 0.00 14.69 203539 SUPPLIES 20011625 28453724 001 - 121810 - 651110 -00000 0.00 113.30 0.00 113.30 203314 SUPPLIES 20011899 28738668 113 - 138312 - 651110 -00000 0.00 308.25 0.00 308.25 203449 SUPPLIES 20011622 28453737 101 - 163612 - 651110 -00000 0.00 67.51 0.00 67.51 203298 SUPPLIES 20011624 28695917 101 - 163630 - 651110 -00000 0.00 20.99 0.00 20.99 203306 SUPPLIES 20011628 28348978 669 - 100220 - 651110 -00000 0.00 140.72 0.00 140.72 203320 SUPPLIES 20011903 28737736 495. 192330- 651110 -00000 0.00 109.25 0.00 109.25 203387 SUPPLIES 20011901 28518606 408 - 233351 - 651110 -00000 0.00 81.36 0.00 81.36 203440 SUPPLIES 20011905 28589571 495 - 192310 - 651110 -00000 0.00 52.54 0.00 52.54 203373 SUPPLIES JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20011617 28552122 203279 SUPPLIES 20011620 28552135 203291 SUPPLIES 20011623 28645152 203299 SUPPLIES /CR 20011900 28487215 203444 SUPPLIES 20011622 28666508 203298 SUPPLIES 20011620 28589510 203291 SUPPLIES 20011902 28487212 203439 SUPPLIES 20011621 28968898 203294 SUPPLIES 20011137 28390447 203285 SUPPLIES 20011905 28695908 203373 SUPPLIES 20011901 28589528 203440 SUPPLIES 20011894 28738626 203645 SUPPLIES 20011904 29057606 203375 SUPPLIES 20011906 2866525 203358 SUPPLIES 20011905 28389995 203373 SUPPLIES 20011619 28695921 203290 SUPPLIES 20011622 28695842 203298 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 24.95 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111. 156313 - 651110 -00000 0.00 408 - 233312 - 651110 -00000 0.00 126 - 138332. 651110 -33202 0.00 111 - 156310. 651110 -00000 0.00 101 - 163612 - 651110 - 00000 0.00 408- 233312 - 651110.00000 0.00 111 - 156425 - 651110 -00000 0.00 001 - 155110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 113. 138910- 651110 -00000 0.00 495 - 192310. 651110 -00000 0.00 408 - 233351 - 651110 -00000 0.00 001 - 144210 - 651110.00000 0.00 001. 155910- 651110 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 651110 -00000 0.00 495 - 192310 - 651110 -00000 0.00 517 - 121640 - 651110 -00000 0.00 101 - 163612 - 651110 -00000 0.00 16J2AGE 44 AMT NET VCHR DISC 68.20 0.00 24.95 0.00 56.13- 0.00 172.70 0.00 3.54 18.30 23.10 38.60 32.71 21.33 88.92 39.06 39.94 26.23 34.22 6.34 19.81 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 68.20 24.95 56.13- 172.70 3.54 18.30 23.10 38.60 32.71 21.33 88.92 39.06 39.94 26.23 34.22 6.34 19.81 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 2AGE 45 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,005.23 CHECK NO 569220 VENDOR 342490 - CORPORATE EXPRESS 20011896 28931809 198 - 157410 - 651110 -00000 0.00 6.76 0.00 6.76 203526 SUPPLIES 20011896 28871184 198. 157410- 651110.00000 0.00 10.68 0.00 10.68 203526 SUPPLIES 20011896 28844099 198 - 157410 - 651110 -00000 0.00 30.48 0.00 30.48 203526 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 47.92 CHECK NO 569185 VENDOR 328250 CREDIT DATA SYSTEMS, INC. 20012006 302050 001 - 157110. 634999 -00000 0.00 288.00 0.00 288.00 201605 REPORT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 288.00 CHECK NO 569197 VENDOR 332170 CSR AMERICA INC 20012181 97204799 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 540.54 0.00 540.54 104492 SUPPLIES 20012181 97255565 355 - 156175 - 762200.80259 0.00 1.041.48 0.00 1,041.48 104492 SUPPLIES 20012181 97214736 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 1,081.08 0.00 1,081.08 104492 SUPPLIES 20012181 97232270 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 732.60 0.00 732.60 104492 SUPPLIES 20012181 97255564 355 - 156175 - 762200.80259 0.00 1,459.26 0.00 1.459.26 104492 SUPPLIES 20012181 97281159 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 887.04 0.00 887.04 104492 SUPPLIES 20012181 97263879 355. 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 1,041.48 0.00 1,041.48 104492 SUPPLIES 20012181 97255566 355 - 156175 - 762200 -80259 0.00 520.74 0.00 520.74 104492 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7,304.22 JANUARY 30, 2002 VENDOR 265700 - DADE PAPER COMPANY COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 0.00 1,324.10 130 - 157710 - 652510.00000 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 201476 SUPPLIES 2,051.84 20012325 491609 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 200419 SUPPLIES 20012227 492328 FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER 200866 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 568775 VENDOR 4400 - CULLIGAN WATER CONDITIONING 20011922 731174 12/24 111 - 156332 - 634999 -00000 0.00 201020 BOTTLED WATER 12/24 20011921 815480 12/24 681 - 421510. 649990 -00000 0.00 201313 BOTTLED WATER 12/24 20011987 780106 10/24 669 - 100220 - 634999 -00000 0.00 201778 BOTTLED WATER 20011988 206755 12/24 408- 210151 - 652990.00000 0.00 201100 BOTTLEED WATER 12/24 20011989 814541 12/24 001 - 122310 - 652990 -00000 0.00 201808 BOTTLED WATER 12/24 20011919 305144 12/24 408- 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 202250 BOTTLED WATER 12/24 20011920 876367 12/24 101. 163630. 634999 -00000 0.00 200023 BOTTLED WATER 12/24 20011921 206532 12/24 681 - 421510 - 649990 -00000 0.00 201313 BOTTLED WATER 12/24 CHECK NO 568953 VENDOR 181730 - D. N. HIGGINS, INC. 20012226 4408 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 203941 REPAIR WTR MAIN CHECK NO 569074 VENDOR 265700 - DADE PAPER COMPANY 20012324 497626 0.00 1,324.10 130 - 157710 - 652510.00000 1,324.10 201476 SUPPLIES 2,051.84 20012325 491609 408 - 253221 - 652510 -00000 200419 SUPPLIES 20012227 492328 001 - 156363 - 652510 -00000 200866 CLEANING SUPPLIES CHECK NO 569286 VENDOR 900050 - DAMON CUSTOM STRUCTURES INC. 16J2AGE 46 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 26.20 29.70 11.88 41.58 23.29 11.88 14.85 65.34 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 8,592.99 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.20 29.70 11.88 41.58 23.29 11.88 14.85 65.34 224.72 8,592.99 8,592.99 0.00 545.48 0.00 545.48 0.00 182.26 0.00 182.26 0.00 1,324.10 0.00 1,324.10 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,051.84 6J2AGE 47 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 301135 REF 309047 DAMON CUSTOM S 113.000000.115420 -00000 0.00 22.20 0.00 DAMON CUSTOM STRUCTURES REF #309047 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569219 VENDOR 341360 DAVID E. CARDWELL 20011705 12/31/01 #36 LEG.FEES 111 - 138317 - 631100 -00000 0.00 80.00 0.00 153189 LEGAL FEES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568923 VENDOR 165270 DAVIDSON TITLES INC. 20012228 32546 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 2,448.06 0.00 200559 TITLES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569271 VENDOR 350660 DEBORAH ALLEN 20012051 1/16 -17 TRVL D ALLEN 001 - 010510- 640300 -00000 0.00 121.54 0.00 1/16 -17 TRVL D ALLEN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568967 VENDOR 193310 DEHART ALARM SYSTEMS, INC. 20012323 11550 111 - 156332.646970 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 201959 JOB #100943 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569199 VENDOR 332420 - DELL COMPUTER CORP 20012229 734142367 001 - 156363.764900.00000 0.00 2,114.00 0.00 203669 DELL 1500 6X400 CHECK TOTAL. 0.00 CHECK NO 569048 VENDOR 256190 DELL MARKETING L.P. 20012034 732777479 198 - 157440- 764900.00000 0.00 2.387.00 0.00 203070 LAP TOP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568914 VENDOR 160920 DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES 20012322 3J -3824 11/4/01 001 - 122240 - 641900 -00000 0.00 233.20 CHECK NO 569033 VENDOR 249860 - DISTRIBUCO JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 48 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 111- 156341 - 641900 -00000 0.00 23.32 0.00 256.52 3J -3824 11/4/01 20012116 24 0852 NOV O1 001 - 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 7,030.02 0.00 7,030.02 24 0852 NOV 01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7.286.54 CHECK NO 568776 VENDOR 5240 - DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES, INC. 20012329 L CROSBY 12/3/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 60.13 0.00 60.13 201853 L CROSBY 12/3/01 20012329 0 MCKENNA 12110101 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 27.95 0.00 27.95 201853 D MCKENNA 12110101 20012329 L CROSBY 12/3/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 39.33 0.00 39.33 201853 L CROSBY 12/3/01 20012329 R ALAMEDA 11120101 001 - 155930 - 631990.00000 0.00 66.95 0.00 66.95 201853 R ALAMEDA 11/20/01 20012329 D CORONA 12/3/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 37.05 0.00 37.05 201853 D CORONA 12/3/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 231.41 CHECK NO 569169 VENDOR 321130 - DIRECT TV 20012321 0001. 026290522 111 - 156380 - 634999 -00000 0.00 515.99 0.00 515.99 202949 1 YR SUBSCRIPTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 515.99 CHECK NO 569227 VENDOR 343980 DIRECT WIRELESS 20012058 98606 001 - 121154 - 641700 -00000 0.00 41.22 0.00 41.22 151248 CARRY HOLSTER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 41.22 CHECK NO 569073 VENDOR 265230 DIRECTORY DISTRIBUTING ASSOCIATES 20012320 49202 307- 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 219.86 0.00 219.86 201640 PHONE DIRECTORIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 219.86 CHECK NO 569033 VENDOR 249860 - DISTRIBUCO 6J2AGE 49 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012319 CPRLLO10802 111 - 156341 - 634999 -00000 0.00 125.00 0.00 201070 FLIERS 20012319 CPRLLO10102 111 - 156341 - 634999 -00000 0.00 125.00 0.00 201070 FLIERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569060 VENDOR 259530 DISTRICT TWENTY MEDICAL EXAMINER 20012052 R KIPP O1 1216 681- 421190 - 634401.00000 0.00 400.00 0.00 R KIPP O1 1216 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568854 VENDOR 111440 DOLPH MAP CO. INC. 20012326 122 001. 010110 - 654110 -00000 0.00 160.00 0.00 153055 CC WALL MAP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568844 VENDOR 106680 - DON HUNTER, SHERIFF 20012011 REIMB.COMBS OIL 16294 001 - 061010. 643200 -00000 0.00 1,570.56 0.00 REIMB.COMBS OIL 12/14/01 20012011 REIMB.COMBS OIL 16407 001. 061010. 643200 -00000 0.00 1,318.60 0.00 REIMB.COMBS OIL 12/20/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569311 VENDOR 900080 - DORIS M.THIBEAULT 301174 AMB.REF D.THIBEAULT2 /2201 490 - 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 AMB.REF D.THIBEAULT #0114054.1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569084 VENDOR 275160 - DSI LABORATORIES 20012328 9/30/01 DRUG SCREENING 001- 144510 - 649990.00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 153104 9/30/01 DRUG SCREENING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568926 VENDOR 166420 - DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS 20012076 A WRIGHT 97 800 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 A WRIGHT 97 800 JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012076 S NIDA 97 1390 S NIDA 97 1390 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 6 J 2PAGE 50 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 11.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 11.00 36.00 CHECK NO 568927 VENDOR 166490 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS 20012370 PP #9 001 - 000000 - 218800 -00000 0.00 1,084.79 0.00 1,084.79 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,084.79 CHECK NO 568929 VENDOR 166510 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS 20012333 2578249 408 - 210111- 649030 -00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 2578249 RECORDING 20012333 2627421 001 - 122370 - 649030 -00000 0.00 217.60 0.00 217.60 2627421 RECORDING 20012333 2578827 408- 210111 - 649030 -00000 0.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 2578827 RECORDING 20012333 2626227 101- 163612 - 649030 -00000 0.00 95.00 0.00 95.00 2626227 RECORDING 20012333 2597238 111 - 138721 - 651210 -00000 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 2597238 COPIES 20012333 2627897 001 - 013010 - 649030 -00000 0.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 2627897 RECORDING 20012333 2627081 113 - 138312 - 649030 -00000 0.00 133.50 0.00 133.50 2627081 RECORDING 20012333 2625014 001 - 010510- 651210 -00000 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 2625014 COPIES 20012333 2554784 114. 178975- 651210 -00000 0.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 2554784 COPIES 20012333 229823 001. 010510 - 651210 -00000 0.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 2629823 COPIES 20012333 2627080 113. 138312 - 649030 -00000 0.00 84.00 0.00 84.00 2627080 RECORDING 20012333 2564614 368. 116360 - 651210 -00165 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 2564614 COPIES JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012333 2613062 2613062 COPIES 20012333 2616561 2616561 COPIES 20012333 2578828 2578828 RECORDING 20012333 2627082 2627082 COPIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408. 210151. 649030 -00000 0.00 001. 010510 - 651210 -00000 0.00 408. 210111 - 649030 -00000 0.00 001. 010510 - 651210 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 568925 VENDOR 166220 - E. B. SIMMONDS 20012066 12948 3.00 408 - 253221 - 634999 -00000 3.00 201620 SVC WELL #4 202.50 20012067 12930 5.00 408. 253211. 634999 -00000 0.00 201784 NEW METER SVC 3,411.76 20012072 12955 0.00 408. 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 200209 SERVICE WELL #16 5,666.00 20012072 12928 0.00 408. 253212 - 634999.00000 0.00 200209 SERVICE WELL #14 100.00 20012066 12929 0.00 408. 253221 - 634999 -00000 0.00 201620 SVC WELL #10 5,475.62 20012067 12927 408- 253211 - 634999 -00000 201784 SVC HSP #3 20012119 12925 101 - 163630 - 646510 -00000 200293 REPAIR SVC CHECK NO 569237 VENDOR 346670 - EARTHGUARD LAKE MANAGEMENT 20012071 2376 001. 156175- 634999.00000 202831 12101 SERVICE CHECK NO 568933 VENDOR 169350 - ECKERD DRUG CO. 20012407 ACCT #1346 1/14/02 001. 155930 - 652710.00000 201854 RX ENDING 1110102 16J2AGE 51 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 1.00 0.00 1.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 202.50 0.00 202.50 5.00 0.00 5.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 817.60 0.00 1,244.82 0.00 1,244.82 0.00 2.814.29 0.00 2,814.29 0.00 408.35 0.00 408.35 0.00 180.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 3,411.76 0.00 3,411.76 0.00 411.25 0.00 411.25 0.00 5.666.00 0.00 5,666.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 14,136.47 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 0.00 5.475.62 0.00 5,475.62 6J2AGE 52 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568997 VENDOR 214040 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL 20012118 #09 001 - 138710 - 882100 -00000 0.00 9,661.87 0.00 201085 1/10 -23/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569110 VENDOR 287090 EDC EDUCATIONAL SERVICES 20012068 1038795 -1 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 25.90 0.00 203505 BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568942 VENDOR 174660 EDISON OIL COMPANY 20012069 190556 408 - 233352. 652410 -00000 0.00 70.44 0.00 202532 MEGAPLEX CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568941 VENDOR 174350 ELITE FIRE & SAFETY EQUIPMENT, INC 20011706 17646 146 - 144380- 652910.00000 0.00 480.00 0.00 153043 FIRE HOSE 20011708 17744 146 - 144380 - 646410.00000 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 153236 AUTO &TRUCK R &M CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569066 VENDOR 261550 ELIZABETH MINDOR 20012077 A PRUDENT O1 1298 681 - 421190 - 634402.00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 A PRUDENT O1 1298 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568963 VENDOR 190020 ELSIE GONZALEZ 20012078 M ALAS O1 1852 681- 421190 - 634402.00000 0.00 8.00 0.00 M ALAS O1 1852 20012078 J YANEZ O1 796 681- 421190 - 634402.00000 0.00 32.00 0.00 J YANEZ O1 796 20012078 J RODRIGUEZ O1 1323 681- 421190 - 634402.00000 0.00 8.00 0.00 J RODRIGUEZ O1 1323 VCHR NET 5,475.62 9,661.87 9,661.87 25.90 25.90 70.44 70.44 480.00 1,000.00 1,480.00 16.00 16.00 8.00 32.00 8.00 6J2AGE 53 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012078 R MARTINEZ 00 416 681 - 421190- 634402 -00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 R MARTINEZ 00 416 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568910 VENDOR 159440 ELTON W. LEHEW, M.D. 20012079 M FLEUR O1 1396 681- 421190 - 631010 -00000 0.00 674.00 0.00 M FLEUR O1 1396 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569312 VENDOR 900080 ENZA R.PULLEN 301186 AMB.REF E.PULLEN 8/7/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 55.59 0.00 AMB.REF E.PULLEN #0129527 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569313 VENDOR 900080 - ERIKA ROLAND 301160 AMB.REF.E.ROLAND 2/26/01 490. 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 59.81 0.00 AMB.REF.E.ROLAND #0114603 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569111 VENDOR 287960 - ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SERVICES 20012080 275532EFL/R KIPP 00 1216 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 66.99 0.00 R KIPP 00 1216 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568777 VENDOR 6120 - EVANS OIL COMPANY 20012115 1068 12/01 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 2,598.89 0.00 200686 FUEL 12101 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569250 VENDOR 349050 EVANS- KLAGES, INC. 20012393 1/7/02 194 - 101540- 634999 -10522 0.00 3,458.33 0.00 203731 12/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569254 VENDOR 349260 EXECUTIVE TITLE & ROSE MARIE MONES 20012286 D/P R MONTES #62254400009 191 - 138785 - 884100.33751 0.00 5,000.00 0.00 D/P R MONTES #62254400009 203694 VCHR NET 16.00 64.00 674.00 674.00 55.59 55.59 59.81 59.81 66.99 66.99 2,598.89 2,598.89 3,458.33 3,458.33 5,000.00 JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION CHECK NO 568999 VENDOR 214900 - F.P.L. 20012415 0277 -08089 12/14 -1/17 0277 -08089 12/14 -1/17 20012352 00687 -70114 12/6- 1/9/02 00687 -70114 12/6- 1/9/02 20012414 08799 -45103 12/12 -1/15 08799 -45103 12/12 -1/15 20012414 08799 -45103 12/12 -1/15 08799 -45103 12/12 -1/15 20012353 28622 -79391 12/6- 1/9/02 28622 -79391 12/6- 1/9/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 061010- 643100 -00000 0.00 111 - 163646 - 643100.00000 0.00 111 - 156332 - 643100.00000 0.00 001 - 156363 - 643100.00000 0.00 111 - 163646. 643100.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 568778 VENDOR 6180 FACTS ON FILE INC. CHECK TOTAL 20011707 319287 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 27,431.26 152978 BOOKS 0.00 667.48 CHECK NO 568779 VENDOR 6250 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 2,889.82 20012087 4- 072 -80534 605 - 122390 - 641950.00000 0.00 571.29 202119 - SHIPPING 1/1 0.00 62,663.86 20012086 4- 052 -74787 495.192310- 641950.00000 0.00 0.00 202295 - SHIPPING 12/25 8.20 0.00 20012405 4 -084 -22821 001 - 144510 - 641950.00000 0.00 39.05 200567 SHPG 112102 39.05 39.35 20012406 4 -071 -44665 681 - 421510.641950 -00000 0.00 110.05 201314 SHPG 1/7/02 0.00 5.90 CHECK NO 568938 VENDOR 172870 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 20012088 4. 051 -32840 111 - 156341 - 641950 -00000 0.00 201721 - SHIPPING, 1/8 20012088 4- 050 -73403 111 - 156313 - 641950 -00000 0.00 201721 - SHIPPING, 12/25 16J2AGE 54 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,000.00 27,431.26 0.00 27,431.26 667.48 0.00 667.48 31,104.01 0.00 31,104.01 2,889.82 0.00 2.889.82 571.29 0.00 571.29 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 62,663.86 325.28 0.00 325.28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 325.28 8.20 0.00 8.20 23.45 0.00 23.45 39.05 0.00 39.05 39.35 0.00 39.35 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 110.05 5.90 0.00 5.90 8.85 0.00 8.85 it 6J2PAGE 55 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012327 4- 077 -37349 111 - 138317. 641950 -00000 0.00 80.95 0.00 200515 SHPG 1/11/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568922 VENDOR 165200 FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND 20012422 PP ENDING 1/25/02 001 - 000000 - 218500 -00000 0.00 700.00 0.00 PP ENDING 1/25/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568842 VENDOR 105760 FERGUSON UNDERGROUND 20012331 839587 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 372.50 0.00 200212 SUPPLIES 20012309 839803 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 48.84 0.00 200211 SUPPLIES 20012311 839440 408. 253212- 655100 -00000 0.00 1.087.80 0.00 200217 SUPPLIES 20012309 839394 408- 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 1,302.50 0.00 200211 SUPPLIES 20012310 839800 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 3,196.20 0.00 200215 SUPPLIES 20012311 838999 408. 253212- 655100 -00000 0.00 80.64 0.00 200217 SUPPLIES 20012309 839601 408 - 253212. 655100 -00000 0.00 1,540.00 0.00 200211 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569051 VENDOR 257370 FERGUSON UNDERGROUND INC. #125 20012332 839834 408 - 253211. 655100 -00000 0.00 94.20 0.00 201791 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569191 VENDOR 330050 FINISHING BY BAKER, INC. 20012428 2741 306. 116360. 763100 -00169 0.00 49,650.00 0.00 203584 POOL REFINISHING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 ri 6J2AGE 56 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 569257 VENDOR 350090 FIRE CHIEF 20011709 P.WILSON ANN.SUB.REN. 146 - 144380 - 654110 -00000 0.00 54.00 0.00 153108 RENEWAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569064 VENDOR 261220 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NAPLES 20012365 PP #9 001. 000000 - 218910 -00000 0.00 76.56 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569187 VENDOR 329100 FIRST STATE BANK OF LIVINGSTON 20012427 #2 BRUSH PATROL VEHICLE 144. 144360 - 644650 -00000 0.00 15,391.55 0.00 203138 BRUSH PATROL VEHICLE #2 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569162 VENDOR 318400 FIRST UNION FINANCIAL 20012383 PP #9 001 - 000000 - 216210 -00000 0.00 133.84 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568981 VENDOR 197290 FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK 20012384 PP #9 001 - 000000- 216210.00000 0.00 222.18 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569340 VENDOR 900090 FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK 301155 95882 410 - 939030. 873200 -00000 0.00 956.87 0.00 2/1/02. 1/31/03 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569262 VENDOR 350410 FLORIDA ANIMAL CONTROL ASSOCIATION 20012022 11/15/01 ASSOC.MMB /SHIP 001 - 155410- 654210 -00000 0.00 160.00 0.00 153296 ASSOC.MMB /SHIP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568838 VENDOR 101720 - FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF COUNTIES VCHR NET 54.00 54.00 76.56 76.56 15,391.55 15,391.55 133.84 133.84 222.18 222.18 956.87 956.87 160.00 160.00 ri 6J?wAGE 57 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012223 REGIST L OCHS 001 - 100110- 654370 -00000 0.00 85.00 0.00 153375 REGIST L OCHS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568964 VENDOR 190470 FLORIDA ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTAL 20012017 CROFT /SIMS /EVANS DUES 521 - 122410 - 654210.00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 153274 MEMB.DUES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569032 VENDOR 248020 FLORIDA CANCER SPECIALISTS 20012312 M CALANA 1/3/02 001. 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 776.75 0.00 201856 M CALANA 1/3/02 20012312 M CALANA 112102 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 219.70 0.00 201856 M CALANA 112102 20012312 M CALANA 1/3/02 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 169.65 0.00 201856 M CALANA 1/3/02 20012312 M CALANA 1/3/02 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 11.70 0.00 201856 M CALANA 1/3/02 20012312 M CALANA 12127101 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 203.45 0.00 201856 M CALANA 12/27/01 20012312 M CALANA 1/3/02 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 534.30 0.00 201856 M CALANA 1/3/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568908 VENDOR 158730 - FLORIDA DEPT OF EDUCATION 20012366 PP #9 001- 000000 - 218900 -00000 0.00 145.00 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568780 VENDOR 6670 FLORIDA ENGINEERING SOCIETY 20012313 1/18/02 SEALS 408 - 210155. 651110 -00000 0.00 205.00 0.00 152960 SEALS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569221 VENDOR 342640 FLORIDA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 58 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012318 21 -03- 1970 -2.2 12/11 -1/15 111. 156332 - 643400.00000 0.00 17.91 0.00 17.91 21 -03- 1970 -2.2 12/11 -1/15 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 17.91 CHECK NO 568782 VENDOR 6790 - FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 20012334 02368 -36284 12/7- 1/10/02 470. 173435 - 643100 -00000 0.00 78.40 0.00 78.40 02368 -36284 12/7- 1/10/02 20012334 41285 -39279 12/7- 1/10/02 470 - 173441 - 643100 -00000 0.00 74,89 0.00 74.89 41285.39279 12/7- 1/10/02 20012334 81290 -37431 12/12- 1/15/02 408 - 233351 - 643100 -00000 0.00 32.80 0.00 32.80 81290 -37431 12/12- 1/15/02 20012334 02968 -36240 12/7- 1/10/02 470 - 173435 - 643100 -00000 0.00 8.82 0.00 8.82 02968 -36240 12/7 - 1/10/02 20012334 74267 -33023 11/21 -12/26 101 - 163620. 643100 -00000 0.00 630.51 0.00 630.51 74267 -33023 11/21- 12/26/01 20012334 74407 -37091 11/21 -12/26 101 - 163620 - 643100 -00000 0.00 353.69 0.00 353.69 74407 -37091 11/21- 12/26/01 20012334 74357 -30069 11/21 -12/26 101. 163620- 643100 -00000 0.00 213.07 0.00 213.07 74357 -30069 11/21- 12/26/01 20012334 44831 -31100 12/6- 1/9/02 101. 163630 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.41 0.00 9.41 44831 -31100 12/6- 1/9/02 20012334 70747 -88212 12/12- 1/15/02 408 - 233312 - 643100.00000 0.00 10.59 0.00 10.59 70747 -88212 12/12. 1/15/02 20012334 01933 -76233 11/27 -12/28 408- 233351 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 01933 -76233 11/27. 12/28/01 20012334 58478 -43348 12/8- 1/9/02 188 - 140480 - 643100 -00000 0.00 636.96 0.00 636.96 58478 -43348 12/8- 1/9/02 20012334 57154.73574 12/11. 1/14/02 408 - 233351 - 643100 -00000 0.00 34.37 0.00 34.37 57154 -73574 12/11. 1/14/02 20012334 73547 -83560 12/12- 1/15/02 408 - 233312 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 73547 -83560 12/12- 1/15/02 20012334 42093 -33287 12/6- 1/9/02 101 - 163630. 643100 -00000 0.00 9.33 0.00 9.33 42093 -33287 12/6- 1/9/02 20012334 54048 -86367 12/13- 1/16/02 001 - 156363 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 54048 -86367 12/3- 1/16/02 JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012334 46304 -11595 12/3- 1/4/02 46304 -11595 12/3- 1/4/02 20012334 46281 -90284 12/7- 1/10/02 46281 -90284 12/7 - 1/10/02 20012334 94977 -51314 12/7. 1/10/02 94977 -51314 12/7. 1/10/02 20012334 48933 -09023 12/7 - 1/10/02 48933 -09023 12/7- 1/10/02 20012334 01110 -99024 12/7- 1/10/02 01110 -99024 12/7- 1/10/02 20012334 85144 -11340 12/7- 1/10/02 85144 -11340 12/7- 1/10/02 20012334 19095 -06238 12/12- 1/15/02 19095 -06238 12/12- 1/15/02 20012334 56244 -74077 11/30- 1/3/02 56244 -74077 11/30- 1/3/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS VCHR DISC SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111 - 156332 - 643100.00000 0.00 408 - 210151 - 643100 -00000 0.00 101. 163612. 643100 -00000 0.00 101 - 163609 - 643100 -00000 0.00 313 - 163611 - 643100 -00000 0.00 101 - 163609 - 643100 -00000 0.00 313 - 163611 - 643100 -00000 0.00 101. 163609- 643100 -00000 0.00 313 - 163611. 643100 -00000 0.00 408- 233351 - 643100.00000 0.00 408- 253221 - 643100 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 568890 VENDOR 144090 - FLORIDA RECREATION & PARK ASSOC. 20012317 MEMBER DUES -SPEC POP 111 - 156425. 654210 -00000 202473 DUES FOR 2002 CHECK NO 568858 VENDOR 112450 - FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES 20012070 1140013185 470 - 173441 - 763100 -00000 203573 LIMEROCK 20012085 1140013135 111. 163645- 653110 -00000 200809 - LIMEROCK 20011844 1140012834 470. 173441- 652990.00000 152119 - LIMEROCK, 12/7 20012070 1140013211 470 - 173441 - 763100.00000 203573 LIMEROCK 16J2AGE 59 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 2.047.46 0.00 2,047.46 481.48 0.00 481.48 249.42 0.00 249.42 110.12 39.20 0.00 110.12 0.00 220.24 95.96 263.58 0.00 95.96 0.00 191.92 80.99 81.00 0.00 161.99 15.31 0.00 15.31 75,034.83 0.00 75,034.83 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 80,522.76 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 0.00 126.38 0.00 126.38 0.00 39.20 0.00 39.20 0.00 263.58 0.00 263.58 0.00 494.62 0.00 494.62 JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012070 1140013358 203573 LIMEROCK 20011844 1140012859 152119 - LIMEROCK, 12110 20012070 1140013115 203573 LIMEROCK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 470. 173441 - 763100 -00000 0.00 470 - 173441 - 652990 -00000 0.00 470 - 173441 - 763100 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569028 VENDOR 243280 - FLORIDA WATER SERVICES 20012316 001612805 -0 11/30- 1/2/02 495 - 192370 - 643400 -00000 0.00 001612805 -0 11/30- 1/2/02 200253 0.00 20012230 009727285 -0 12/5- 1/7/02 001 - 061010. 643400 -00000 183.08 009727285 -0 12/5- 1/7/02 0.00 20012230 009727295 -9 12/5- 1/7/02 001 - 061010. 643400 -00000 445.50 009727295 -9 12/5- 1/7/02 0.00 20012230 009727305 -6 12/5 -1/7 470 - 173442. 643400 -00000 29.40 009727305 -6 12/5 -1/7 0.00 20012230 009738135 -4 12/12- 1/12/02 001 - 156363. 643400.00000 590.00 009738135 -4 12/12 -1/12 0.00 20012230 009723515 -4 12/11 -1/12 001 - 156363. 643400 -00000 5.00 009723515 -4 12/11 -1/12 CHECK NO 568989 VENDOR 204170 - FORESTRY RESOURCES 20012315 453167 408- 253212 - 646314 -00000 200220 MULCH CHECK NO 568950 VENDOR 179580 - FORT MYERS VAULT COMPANY 20012330 BOYETTE /MITCHELL 001 - 122370 - 631990.00000 201807 BOYETTE /MITCHELL CHECK NO 569314 VENDOR 900080 - FRANK J.LIPSCOMB 301173 AMB.REF F.LIPSCOMB 6/3/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 AMB.REF F.LIPSCOMB #0124279.1 16J2AGE 60 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 135.68 0.00 135.68 49.22 0.00 49.22 141.42 0.00 141.42 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.250.10 0.00 385.84 0.00 385.84 0.00 789.39 0.00 789.39 0.00 174.86 0.00 174.86 0.00 183.08 0.00 183.08 0.00 524.68 0.00 524.68 0.00 445.50 0.00 445.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,503.35 0.00 29.40 0.00 29.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 29.40 0.00 590.00 0.00 590.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 590.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2PAGE 61 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5.00 CHECK NO 569114 VENDOR 290310 - FREIGHTLINER OF TAMPA 20012314 119314P 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 15.83 0.00 15.83 200826 PARSTS 20012314 119448P 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 121.09 0.00 121.09 200826 PARSTS 20012314 119851P 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 199.20 0.00 199.20 200826 PARSTS 20012314 119900P 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 58.81 0.00 58.81 200826 PARSTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 394.93 CHECK NO 569287 VENDOR 900050 - G B PENINSULA LTD 301158 308903 G B PENINSULA LTD 113. 000000- 115420.00000 0.00 300.00 0.00 300.00 308903 G B PENINSULA LTD REFUND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 300.00 CHECK NO 569207 VENDOR 333980 - G &K SERVICES 20011790 681481 1/18 111- 156332 - 652130.00000 0.00 20.15 0.00 20.15 201438 1/18 20011802 671103 1/1 111 - 156334 - 652130.00000 0.00 30.41 0.00 30.41 201438 1/1 20011790 671930 112 111. 156332. 652130 -00000 0.00 50.85 0.00 50.85 201438 1102 20011806 670351 12/31 408. 253212 - 652130 -00000 0.00 258.83 0.00 258.83 200222 12/31 UNIFORMS 20011798 677469 1 /11 470 - 173441 - 652130 -00000 0.00 37.95 0.00 37.95 201191 1 /11 20011807 666375 114 - 178975. 652130 -00000 0.00 61.73 0.00 61.73 200355 20011813 670348 12/31 408 - 233352. 652130 -00000 0.00 111.36 0.00 111.36 200715 12/31 UNIFORMS 20011800 678312 1/14 111 - 156390 - 652130 -00000 0.00 3.22 0.00 3.22 201438 1/14 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 62 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011799 670350 12/31 001. 156363 - 652130 -00000 0.00 44.33 0.00 44.33 201438 12/31 20011803 670349 12/31 111 - 156381 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1.44 0.00 1.44 201478 12/31 20011809 678313 1/14 408 - 253211. 652130 -00000 0.00 84.72 0.00 84.72 200384 UNIFORMS 1/14 20011790 678332 1/14 111 - 156332 - 652130 -00000 0.00 30.41 0.00 30.41 201438 1/14 20011802 675089 1/8 111 - 156334 - 652130.00000 0.00 30.41 0.00 30.41 201438 1/8 20011790 673512 1/4 111 - 156332 - 652130 -00000 0.00 16.12 0.00 16.12 201438 1/4 20011811 670363 12/31 408 - 233312 - 652130 -00000 0.00 131.03 0.00 131.03 200612 12/31 UNIFORMS 20011790 677503 1 /11 111 - 156332. 652130 -00000 0.00 20.15 0.00 20.15 201438 1 /11 20011810 669523 12/28 408 - 253221. 652130 -00000 0.00 73.31 0.00 73.31 200420 12/28 UNIFORMS 20011804 671932 112 001 - 172930. 652130.00000 0.00 60.49 0.00 60.49 202113 1/2 20011799 671931 112 001 - 156363 - 652130 -00000 0.00 16.12 0.00 16.12 201438 1/2 20011802 679074 1/15 111 - 156334. 652130.00000 0.00 30.41 0.00 30.41 201438 1/15 20011808 666376 12/24 111 - 163647 - 652130 -00000 0.00 35.17 0.00 35.17 200374 UNIFORMS 12/24 20011797 670346 12/31 001 - 155410 - 652130 -00000 0.00 46.85 0.00 46.85 201167 12/31 20011801 675089 1/8 111 - 156343 - 634999.00000 0.00 5.76 0.00 5.76 202360 1/08 20011799 674341 1/7 001- 156363 - 652130 -00000 0.00 44.33 0.00 44.33 201438 1/7 20011807 670354 114 - 178975 - 652130 -00000 0.00 61.73 0.00 61.73 200355 12/31 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 63 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011814 670347 12/31 408- 233350 - 652130 -00000 0.00 29.40 0.00 29.40 200752 12/31 UNIFORMS 20011790 669530 12/28 111 - 156332. 652130 -00000 0.00 16.12 0.00 16.12 201438 12128 20011790 679900 1/16 111 - 156332 - 652130 -00000 0.00 50.85 0.00 50.85 201438 1/16 20011800 670344 12/31 111 - 156390 - 652130.00000 0.00 3.22 0.00 3.22 201438 12/31 20011815 670358 12/31 408 - 233351 - 652130 -00000 0.00 357.94 0.00 357.94 200774 12/31 UNIFORMS 20011790 677500 1 /11 111 - 156332 - 652130 -00000 0.00 16.12 0.00 16.12 201438 1 /11 20011790 670364 12/31 111 - 156332. 652130 -00000 0.00 30.41 0.00 30.41 201438 12/31 20011808 670355 12/31 111 - 163647 - 652130 -00000 0.00 35.17 0.00 35.17 200374 UNIFORMS 12/31 20011801 671103 1/1 111 - 156343 - 634999.00000 0.00 2.88 0.00 2.88 202360 1/1 20011799 675913 1/9 001 - 156363 - 652130 -00000 0.00 16.12 0.00 16.12 201438 1/9 20011800 670344 12/31 111 - 156332 - 652130 -00000 0.00 24.18 0.00 24.18 201438 12/31 20011790 667535 12128 111 - 156332 - 652130 -00000 0.00 20.15 0.00 20.15 201438 12/28 20011799 679901 1/16 001 - 156363 - 652130 -00000 0.00 16.12 0.00 16.12 201438 1/16 20011801 679074 1/15 111 - 156343 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1.44 0.00 1.44 202360 1/15 20011809 670345 12/31 408 - 253211 - 652130 -00000 0.00 80.69 0.00 80.69 200384 UNIFORMS 12/31 20011790 675912 1/9 111 - 156332 - 652130 -00000 0.00 50.85 0.00 50.85 201438 1/09 20011807 678322 114. 178975 - 652130 -00000 0.00 61.73 0.00 61.73 200355 1/14 JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20011816 670356 12/31 200025 12/31 20011807 674345 200355 1/7 20011800 678312 1/14 201438 1/14 20011790 673515 1/4 201438 1/04 20011812 670362 12/31 200658 12/31 UNIFORMS 20011803 670349 12/31 201478 12/31 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101 - 163630 - 652130 -00000 0.00 114 - 178975. 652130 -00000 0.00 111 - 156332. 652130 -00000 111 - 156332 - 652130 -00000 408- 233313. 652130.00000 111 - 156381. 652130 -00000 CHECK NO 569215 VENDOR 339190 G &K SERVICES 20011796 679080 1/15 101 - 163620 - 652130 -00000 20.15 201127 1/15 0.00 20011805 670361 12/31 109 - 182901. 652130 -00000 200069 12/31 UNIFORMS 20011795 671929 12120 521 - 122410 - 652130 -00000 200954 12/20 20011796 671109 1/1 101 - 163620 - 652130.00000 201127 1/1 20011795 675911 1/9 521 - 122410. 652130.00000 200954 1/9 20011805 670361 12/31 109 - 182901. 652130 -00000 200069 12/31 UNIFORMS 20011805 670361 12/31 109- 182602 - 652130 -00000 200069 12/31 UNIFORMS CHECK NO 569288 VENDOR 900050 - GATEWAY SHOPPES ASSOC LLC 301159 309630 GATEWAY 113 - 000000. 115420 -00000 309630 GATEWAY REFUND OVERAGE FEES 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16J2AGE 64 AMT NET VCHR DISC 140.02 0.00 61.73 0.00 24.18 0.00 20.15 0.00 16.60 0.00 4.03 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 80.93 0.00 1.95 0.00 121.50 0.00 80.93 0.00 120.25 0.00 53.96 0.00 16.12 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20.00 0.00 VCHR NET 140.02 61.73 24.18 20.15 16.60 4.03 2,387.38 80.93 1.95 121.50 80.93 120.25 53.96 16.12 475.64 20.00 r. 6J2AGE 65 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568783 VENDOR 7320 - GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC. 20011822 185826 001 - 156110 - 652610 -00000 0.00 149.90 001. 156110. 641950 -00000 0.00 5.90 0.00 153106 CASSETTE PLAYER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569315 VENDOR 900080 - GEHA INSURANCE 301182 AMB.REF GEHA /INS 2111100 490 - 000000 - 116004.00000 0.00 251.25 0.00 AMB.REF J.CAPO #0011537.1 301183 AMB.REF J.CAPO 2/16/00 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 363.75 0.00 AMB.REF J.CAPO #0012077 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569316 VENDOR 900080 - GEICO DIRECT HOME OFFICE 301162 AMB.REF.GEICO 8/9/01 490 - 000000- 116004.00000 0.00 388.00 0.00 AMB.REF.B.WILSON #0129677 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568784 VENDOR 7510 - GENERAL INSURANCE UNDERWRITERS 20011786 NOTARY STAMP / W., WARREN 113 - 138935 - 654210 -00000 0.00 98.95 0.00 153333 NOTARY STAMP / W WARREN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568785 VENDOR 7750 GOLDEN GATE FIRE 20012081 FALSE ALARM 12112 111 - 156313 - 634999 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 152560 FALSE ALARM RESPONSE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568786 VENDOR 7770 - GOLDEN GATE NURSERY 20012210 73443 111 - 163645. 646314 -00000 0.00 90.00 0.00 200836 GRASS 20012210 73422 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 200836 GRASS 20012210 73419 111 - 163645 - 646314.00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 200836 GRASS JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012208 73351 202565 HORSE SUPPLIES 20012210 73428 200836 GRASS 20012210 73393 200836 GRASS 20012208 73250 202565 HORSE SUPPLIES 20012213 73230 201599 GRASS 20012208 73207 202565 HORSE SUPPLIES 20012210 73435 200836 GRASS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 156363 - 652255 -00000 0.00 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 111 - 163645. 646314 -00000 0.00 001 - 156363. 652255 -00000 0.00 408 - 233351 - 646314.00000 0.00 001 - 156363 - 652255.00000 0.00 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 568936 VENDOR 171810 - GOLDEN GATE POOL SUPPLIES INC. 20012216 16589 12/19 111 - 156349. 652311.00000 202787 12/19 CHEM CHECK NO 568947 VENDOR 178630 - GRAINGER 20012082 931 - 460819 -2 200946 PARTS 20012083 287 - 293340 -9 200228 PARTS 20012082 287 - 608491.0 200946 PARTS 20012083 287 - 034788.3 200228 PARTS 101- 163620- 652990 -00000 408 - 253212. 652990 -00000 101 - 163620 - 652990 -00000 408 - 253212 - 652990 -00000 CHECK NO 569061 VENDOR 260150 - GRAY SYSTEMS INC 20011821 25632 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 153047 2002 COMPENDIUM 16J2AGE 66 AMT NET VCHR DISC 100.35 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 117.40 0.00 95.00 0.00 45.40 0.00 90.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 117.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 83.76 48.00 97.72 196.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 87.95 0.00 VCHR NET 100.35 90.00 90.00 117.40 95.00 45.40 90.00 808.15 117.00 117.00 83.76 48.00 97.72 196.25 425.73 87.95 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 16J2AGE 67 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 87.95 CHECK NO 569200 VENDOR 332600 GRAY- CALHOUN AND ASSOCIATES, INC 20011873 500 313 - 163673. 763100 -60172 0.00 2,775.00 0.00 2,775.00 203078 11/20- 12/31/01 20011124 497 313 - 163673. 763100 -60172 0.00 3,275.00 0.00 3,275.00 203080 11/20 - 12/31/01 20011123 498 313 - 163673.763100 -60172 0.00 2,775.00 0.00 2,775.00 203079 11/20- 12/31/01 20011125 499 313 - 163673 - 763100 -60172 0.00 3,775.00 0.00 3,775.00 203081 11/20- 12/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 12,600.00 CHECK NO 568788 VENDOR 7900 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 20011794 0630219953 408. 233313 - 655200 -00000 0.00 74.20 0.00 74.20 200663 ELECTRIC /DISC 20011789 0630221310 408. 253211 - 655100 -00000 0.00 0.56• 0.00 0.56- 201800 CREDIT 20012211 06302 13161 111.156332- 652991 -00000 0.00 165.46 0.00 165.46 201014 ELEC 20011794 0630219953 408 - 233313 - 655200 -00000 0.00 1.48- 0.00 1.48- 200663 ELECTRIC /DISC 20011787 06300222089 408 - 233352 - 652910.00000 0.00 0.57- 0.00 0.57- 201421 ELE PARTS /DISCNC 20011787 06300222089 408 - 233352 - 652910 -00000 0.00 42.11 0.00 42.11 201421 ELE PARTS /DISCNC 20012211 06302 13380 111 - 156332 - 652991.00000 0.00 89.00- 0.00 89.00- 201014 ELEC 20011792 0630221498 408- 233312 - 655200 -00000 0.00 236.16 0.00 236.16 200628 ELECTRIC 20011791 0630222673 408 - 233351 - 655100 -00000 0.00 290.11 0.00 290.11 200778 PARTS 20012211 06302 13865 111 - 156332 - 652991 -00000 0.00 573.12 0.00 573.12 201014 ELEC CHECK NO 569021 VENDOR 235730 - GRILL & FILL. INC. 20011784 PROPAIN 1120102 P0153204 101 - 163620 - 652990.00000 0.00 42.00 0.00 42.00 153204 PROPAIN 1120102 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 42.00 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2PAGE 68 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011788 0630221958 001 - 121141. 652910 -00000 0.00 10.33 0.00 10.33 201351 ELE PARTS 20012211 06302 12609 111 - 156332. 652991 -00000 0.00 4,589.06 0.00 4.589.06 201014 ELEC 20011793 0630220577 408 - 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 70.73 0.00 70.73 200782 ELECTRIC 20011792 0630216447 408 - 233312 - 655200 -00000 0.00 256.66 0.00 256.66 200628 ELECTRIC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,216.33 CHECK NO 569027 VENDOR 239140 - GREAT AMERICA LEASING CORPORATION 20012215 2193415 THRU 2/1/02 408 - 210105. 644620 -00000 0.00 489.00 0.00 489.00 200183 COPIER RENTAL THRU 2/1/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 489.00 CHECK NO 568846 VENDOR 106780 - GREGORY COURT REPORTING 20011820 956945 11 /14D RICE 681 - 410310 - 633031 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 956833 11 /14D RICE 00681CFA 20011820 956833 11/7 D RICE 681 - 410310 - 633031 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 956833 11/7 D RICE 00681CFA 20011820 956945 11 /14D RICE 681 - 410310 - 633041 -00000 0.00 120.00 0.00 120.00 956945 11 /14D RICE 00681CFA 20011820 956833 11/7 D RICE 681 - 410310 - 633041.00000 0.00 163.00 0.00 163.00 956833 11/7 D RICE 00681CFA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 373.00 CHECK NO 569139 VENDOR 308520 - GREGORY GONZALES 20012214 TENNIS 11/7 -12/12 111 - 156341. 634999 -00000 0.00 126.00 0.00 126.00 TENNIS 11/7/ -12/12 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 126.00 CHECK NO 569021 VENDOR 235730 - GRILL & FILL. INC. 20011784 PROPAIN 1120102 P0153204 101 - 163620 - 652990.00000 0.00 42.00 0.00 42.00 153204 PROPAIN 1120102 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 42.00 I 6T7._. .. JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGE 69 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 569263 VENDOR 350430 GUILLERMO ZELAYA 20011755 PERMIT /SINK 191. 138785- 884100 -33751 0.00 53.00 0.00 53.00 153229 PERMIT /SINK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 53.00 CHECK NO 569234 VENDOR 345360 GULF COAST LANDFILL 20011868 S1201 -01 408- 233352 - 634999 -00000 0.00 20,921.78 0.00 20,921.78 201920 TO 12/31/01 20011867 N1201 -01 408 - 233312 - 634999 -00000 0.00 27,347.55 0.00 27,347.55 201918 TO 12/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 48.269.33 CHECK NO 568901 VENDOR 152410 HACH 20011785 2937680 408 - 233350 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 1.000.00 152147 CHEMS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,000.00 CHECK NO 568878 VENDOR 131720 HARCROS CHEMICALS, INC. 20012217 740056363 408. 233352 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,356.00 0.00 1,356.00 203545 CHEM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,356.00 CHECK NO 568790 VENDOR 8200 HARMON BROTHERS ROCK CO, INC 20012218 7456 111. 163645 - 653110 -00000 0.00 1,276.50 0.00 1,276.50 202642 LIMEROCK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,276.50 CHECK NO 569210 VENDOR 337970 HARRELL'S 20012220 51776 111 - 156332 - 646315.00000 0.00 290.00 0.00 290.00 150433 QUICK DRY 20012220 56551 111. 156334- 646315 -00000 0.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 150433 QUICK DRY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 790.00 CHECK NO 569175 VENDOR 323370 - HARRIS COUNTY CHILD SUPPORT 6J2AGE 70 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012373 PP #9 001 - 000000- 218810 -00000 0.00 179.08 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569317 VENDOR 900080 - HARTFORD LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 301150 AMB.REF HARTFORD 8/10/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 59.18 0.00 AMB.REF K.MANZOLILLO #0129815 -2 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568845 VENDOR 106690 - HAZEN & SAWYER, ENGINEERS 20012190 #38 413 - 263611 - 631400 -73031 0.00 88,366.60 0.00 603943 11 /01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569289 VENDOR 900050 - HEATHER LUKOSAVICH 301157 PARKS HEATHER LUKOSAVICH 111 - 156341 - 347270 -00000 0.00 28.00 0.00 PARKS HEATHER LUKOSAVICH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569224 VENDOR 343340 - HEFTY TRUCKING INC 20011780 11241 111 - 156332 - 646315 -00000 0.00 750.00 0.00 152290 HAULING 20011781 11079 111 - 156334 - 646315.00000 0.00 584.18 0.00 150974 HAULING 20011782 11119 111 - 156332 - 646315 -00000 0.00 270.00 0.00 150988 HAULING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569195 VENDOR 331450 - HIRECHECK, INC. 20012212 900ADKO112 001 - 121810. 634999 -00000 0.00 147.00 0.00 201164 THRU 12/28 BKGRD CKS 20012212 9002HDO112 001. 121810 - 634999 -00000 0.00 47.00 0.00 201164 THRU 12/28 BKGRD CKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568792 VENDOR 8810 - HOLE MONTES AND ASSOC INC CHECK NO 569129 VENDOR 296190 - HOLIDAY INN BEACH RESORT 16J2AGE 71 JANU ARY 30 , 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012435 42740R 496 - 192340. 631400 -33327 0.00 7,436.65 0.00 7,436.65 103671 11/24- 12/21/01 20011864 42738 497 - 192340 - 631400 -33010 0.00 4,238.90 0.00 4,238.90 102671 11/24- 12/21/01 20012188 42612R 413 - 263611. 631400.73949 0.00 33,704.73 0.00 33,704.73 202328 TO 11/23/01 20011860 42737 496 - 192341 - 631400 -33330 0.00 1,497.00 0.00 1,497.00 7479 11/24- 12/21/01 20011863 42736 496 - 192340 - 631400 -33343 0.00 8,694.80 0.00 8.694.80 103670 11/24- 12/21/01 20011866 42693 001. 155410 - 631400 -00000 0.00 3.500.00 0.00 3,500.00 202743 11/24- 12/21/01 20011862 42741 496 - 192340 - 631400 -33327 0.00 1,177.40 0.00 1,177.40 103672 11/24 - 12/21/01 20012188 42616 413 - 263611 - 631400 -73949 0.00 3.812.50 0.00 3,812.50 202328 10/27- 11/23/01 20012188 42397R 413 - 263611. 631400 -73949 0.00 32,894.74 0.00 32,894.74 202328 TO 10/26/01 20012188 42716 413 - 263611 - 631400 -73949 0.00 33.097.24 0.00 33.097.24 202328 TO 12121101 20012188 42717 414 - 263611 - 631400 -73916 0.00 680.00 0.00 680.00 202328 TO 12/21/01 20011865 42743 496 - 192340. 631400 -33383 0.00 3,392.00 0.00 3,392.00 106876 11/24- 12/21/01 20011861 42742 496 - 192340 - 631400 -33326 0.00 3,137.50 0.00 3,137.50 102558 11/24- 12/21/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 137,263.46 CHECK NO 569290 VENDOR 900050 HOLIDAY BUILDERS 301156 295023 IMPACT FEE REFUND 338- 163650 - 363510 -00000 0.00 1,825.00 0.00 1,825.00 HOLIDAY BLDRS #295023 IMPACT REFUND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.825.00 CHECK NO 569129 VENDOR 296190 - HOLIDAY INN BEACH RESORT JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012060 A.SANCHEZ 2/3 -8/02 152886 A.SANCHEZ HOTEL ACCOM. CHECK NO 568920 VENDOR 164250 - HOME DEPOT 20011761 8200553 152437 CARDENAS #60205000405 20012292 9191139 200912 BLDG MAINT 20011760 8200554 152436 CARDENAS #60205000405 20012292 9191140 200912 BLDG MAINT 20012292 8032035 200912 BLDG MAINT CHECK NO 569186 VENDOR 328710 - HOME DEPOT 153197 9050984 153197 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 155410 - 640300 -00000 0.00 191 - 138785. 884200 -33751 001 - 156363 - 652990 -00000 191 - 138785 - 884200.33751 001. 156363- 652990 -00000 001. 156363. 652990 -00000 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16J2AGE 72 AMT NET VCHR DISC 375.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 617.89 29.39• 538.89 27.73 29.39 CHECK TOTAL 111. 163647 - 652990 -00000 0.00 181.78 CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 569098 VENDOR 281640 - HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS 20011758 1200636 191 - 138785 - 884100 -33751 30.00 152307 MCDUFFIE #36249360009 159.51 20011757 4191428 191 - 138785 - 884100 -33751 849.18 152947 TOWNSEND #62095120001 849.18 20011756 5191371 191 - 138785 - 884100.33751 281.29 152946 TOWNSEND #62095120001 1,032.92 20011759 2191500 191 - 138785- 884100 -33751 1,095.77 153222 M CHERY #35880600006 1.095.77 20011955 3211577 191 - 138785 - 884200 -33751 203667 SANCHEZ #77161040000 20011609 1200635 191. 138785 - 884100 -33751 203819 MCDUFFIE #36249360009 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 375.00 375.00 617.89 29.39- 538.89 27.73 29.39 1,184.51 181.78 181.78 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 0.00 159.51 0.00 159.51 0.00 849.18 0.00 849.18 0.00 281.29 0.00 281.29 0.00 1,032.92 0.00 1.032.92 0.00 1,095.77 0.00 1.095.77 6J2AGE 73 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569093 VENDOR 279710 - HORVATH ELECTRIC MOTORS 20012399 0872 408 - 233312 - 634999 -00000 0.00 3,445.05 0.00 202201 12/20 MOTOR & SERV 20012399 0871 408- 233312 - 634999 -00000 0.00 455.31 0.00 202201 12/20 MOTORS & SERV CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569273 VENDOR 350680 . HR COLLIER 20012219 HR2002 DUES P WILTSIE 001 - 121810 - 654210 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 153355 DUES P WILTSIE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568962 VENDOR 189680 HUMISTON & MOORE ENGINEERS 20011859 9040 195. 110406 - 631400 -10272 0.00 918.98 0.00 103334 TO 12/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569165 VENDOR 319770 IAFF 3670 20012382 PP #9 001 - 000000 - 218700 -00000 0.00 31.00 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568882 VENDOR 134560 ICMA RETIREMENT TRUST -457 20012364 PP #9 001 - 000000.217001 -00000 0.00 28,899.02 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569018 VENDOR 232270 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS. INC. 20012301 12595386 111. 156332 - 646710 -00000 0.00 402.86 0.00 201199 12/20 -3/20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568856 VENDOR 112220 IMMOKALEE BULLETIN 20012221 ACCT 791196 121 - 138755.649100 -33024 0.00 253.44 0.00 150769 PUBLIC HEARING ADS JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 74 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 253.44 CHECK NO 568894 VENDOR 147920 - IMMOKALEE WATER & SEWER DISTRICT 20012291 2126066400 12/18 -1 /11 111 - 156334 - 643400.00000 0.00 87.41 0.00 87.41 2126066400 12/18 -1 /11 20012291 2104011800 12/20.1/18 111 - 156334 - 643400 -00000 0.00 10.05 0.00 10.05 2104011800 12/20 -1/18 20012291 2126060700 12/18 -1 /11 111 - 156334 - 643400 -00000 0.00 7.97 0.00 7.97 2126060700 12/18 -1 /11 20012291 2111161500 12/11 -1/08 111 - 156334. 643400 -00000 0.00 5,544.61 0.00 5,544.61 2111161500 12/11.1/08 20012293 1140010500 12/7 -1/7 495 - 192330 - 643400 -00000 0.00 24.76 0.00 24.76 1140010500 200255 12/7 1/7 20012293 1140010200 12/7.1/7 495. 192330- 643400 -00000 0.00 43.33 0.00 43.33 1140010200 200255 12/7 1/7 20012293 1140010100 12/7 -1/7 495 - 192330 - 643400 -00000 0.00 62.56 0.00 62.56 1140010100 200255 1217 1/7 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,780.69 CHECK NO 568793 VENDOR 9270 - INDUSTRIAL AIR PRODUCTS 20012295 35156 146 - 144380 - 652720 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 200294 CYLINDERS 20012294 34710 470 - 173441 - 652990 -00000 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 201194 RENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 55.00 CHECK NO 569192 VENDOR 330410 INFINITY WATCH CORP 20011817 163356 491. 144611. 652990 -33417 0.00 490.25 0.00 490.25 152164 WATCHS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 490.25 CHECK NO 568921 VENDOR 164780 INFO PLUS 20012305 20021 HORSESHOE DR 473 - 173413 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,054.90 0.00 1,054.90 202574 HORSESHOE DR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,054.90 CHECK NO 569128 VENDOR 296020 - INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS 16J2AGE 75 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 569245 VENDOR 347940 INFO PLUS INFORMATION SYSTEMS 20012296 20021 E TRAIL 470 - 173463 - 634999 -00000 0.00 455.00 0.00 455.00 203113 E TRAIL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 455.00 CHECK NO 569253 VENDOR 349150 INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTES 20011783 3118 521 - 122410. 654360 -00000 0.00 606.00 0.00 606.00 152518 CLASS /D CROFT /L MUPRHY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 606.00 CHECK NO 568863 VENDOR 115600 - INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT SERV. 20012304 13877 516 - 121650 - 631990.00000 0.00 2,610.00 0.00 2,610.00 201860 1/2 20012297 13878 518 - 121630 - 631990.00000 0.00 290.00 0.00 290.00 201663 2/02 SERV FEE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,900.00 CHECK NO 569115 VENDOR 290590 - INTELITRAN 20012307 CCDOT 1201 1/14 126. 138330 - 634999 -33722 0.00 29.857.00 0.00 29,857.00 106739 1/14 20012302 TDYST 1201 1/14 126 - 138330- 634999 -00000 0.00 54.74 0.00 54.74 200387TDYST 1201 1/14 20012306 CCVDOT 1201 1/14 126 - 138333 - 634999 -33274 0.00 6,911.00 0.00 6,911.00 203621 1/14 IMMOK CIRCUT 20012302 CCDOT 1201 1/14 126 - 138330 - 634999 -00000 0.00 894.00 0.00 894.00 200387 CCDOT1201 1/14 20012302 TDOC 1201 1/14 126 - 138330 - 634999 -00000 0.00 3,450.21 0.00 3,450.21 200387 TDOC 1201 1/14 20012307 CCDOT 1201 1/14 126 - 138333. 634999 -33274 0.00 11,079.00 0.00 11,079.00 203621 CCDOT 1201 1/14 20012307 CCDOT 1201 1/14 126 - 138330 - 634999.00000 0.00 27,625.50 0.00 27,625.50 202387 CCDOT 1201 1/14 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 79.871.45 CHECK NO 569128 VENDOR 296020 - INTERMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012298 2043893$$$$12/13 2043893 12/13 20012064 2057749 THRU 12/13/01 2057749 THRU 12/13/01 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001. 121143- 641400.00000 0.00 001 - 000000. 202800.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 568881 VENDOR 134360 - INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE 20012367 PP #9 001 - 000000- 218900 -00000 0.00 PP #9 20012368 PP #9 001 - 000000 - 218900 -00000 0.00 PP #9 CHECK NO 569189 VENDOR 329450 - IRON AGE CORPORATION 596.45 20011818 2749230PB 001 - 155410 - 652110 -00000 0.00 2.79 152519 SAFETY SHOES 0.00 599.24 20011818 280980PB 001 - 155410 - 652110 -00000 0.00 0.00 152519 SAFETY SHOES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20012299 277068P 408 - 253211 - 652120.00000 0.00 99.00 200390 SAFETY SHOES 99.00 314.00 20012300 277067P 408 - 253221 - 652990 -00000 0.00 311.0( 203494 SAFETY SHOES 0.00 1,050.0( 20012303 279229PB 111 - 163647 - 652140 -00000 0.00 203727 SHOES CHECK NO 569318 VENDOR 900080 - IRVIN A.SUTTON 301171 AMB.REF I.SUTTON 12/14/00 490. 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 AMB.REF I.SUTTON #0106695 -1 CHECK NO 569214 VENDOR 339070 - J &J WHOLESALE NURSERY 20011604 1310 322 - 183825 - 646320 -00000 0.00 203784 PLANTS 16J2AGE 76 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 596.45 0.00 596.45 2.79 0.00 2.79 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 599.24 50.00 0.00 50.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 86.00 0.00 86.00 99.00 0.00 99.00 314.00 0.00 314.0( 311.00 0.00 311.0( 1,050.00 0.00 1,050.0( CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.860.01 60.98 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 907.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 569016 VENDOR 231810 - J. M. TODD COMPANY 20011581 69904 408 - 253221 - 651210 -00000 0.00 200423 11/27- 12/26/01 20011947 69593 111 - 156313 - 646710 -00000 0.00 201491 12/2- 1/2/02 CHECK NO 568934 VENDOR 169530 - J. ROLAND LIEBER, P.A. 20011605 0201.0002 109- 182900 - 634999 -00000 202720 SVS 11/24- 12/29/01 CHECK NO 569208 VENDOR 336570 - J.A. WEBSTER, INC. 20012390 1106552 001 - 155410. 652910 -00000 - J.M. TODD COMPANY 153251 SUPPLIES 70192 20011935 1333552 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 201680 153313 RX 26.00 20012391 1106555 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 001 - 010510. 651210 -00000 0.00 001. 155410 - 652910 -00000 11/30 -12/29 153362 SUPPLIES 20012195 20012390 1121421 001 - 155410 - 652910 -00000 0.00 153251 SUPPLIES 10/29 -11/28 20012390 1106991 001 - 155410 - 652910 -00000 0.00 153251 SUPPLIES 0.00 20011944 1319890 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 153162 GAUZE 0.00 CHECK NO 569013 VENDOR 231020 - J.M. TODD COMPANY 20011948 70192 0.00 001 - 010510 - 651210 -00000 0.00 201680 12/9 -1/8 26.00 20011948 69400 0.00 001 - 010510. 651210 -00000 0.00 201680 11/30 -12/29 20012195 68073 0.00 669 - 100220- 646710.00000 0.00 203692 10/29 -11/28 52.80 16J2AGE 77 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 43.38 0.00 43.38 25.00 0.00 25.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 68.38 0.00 665.00 0.00 665.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 665.00 0.00 26.00 0.00 26.00 0.00 3.75 0.00 3.75 0.00 58.96 0.00 504.68 0.00 563.64 0.00 52.80 0.00 52.80 0.00 19.10 0.00 19.10 0.00 66.80 0.00 66.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 732.09 0.00 346.28 0.00 346.28 0.00 53.97 0.00 53.97 0.00 21.81 0.00 21.81 MA 1 6 J AGE 78 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568794 VENDOR 9540 JACK AND ANN'S FEED 20011574 66641 111 - 156334 - 652990 -00000 0.00 149.08 0.00 201054 SUPPLIES 20011574 67144 111 - 156334 - 652990 -00000 0.00 73.03 0.00 201054 SUPPLIES 20012385 67195 111- 156349 - 652990 -00000 0.00 28.64 0.00 201490 SUPPLIES 20012385 67714 111 - 156349. 652990 -00000 0.00 19.89 0.00 201490 SUPPLIES 20012385 66215 111 - 156349 - 652990 -00000 0.00 391.36 0.00 201490 SUPPLIES 20011574 67144 111. 156334- 652910 -00000 0.00 60.98 0.00 201054 SUPPLIES 20012385 67440 111 - 156349 - 652990 -00000 0.00 13.16 0.00 201490 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568851 VENDOR 109260 JACQUELINE SILANO 20011576 12/14 LELY 152 - 162541 - 649990 -00000 0.00 205.90 0.00 203925 12/14 LELY 20011577 12/14 GG 136 - 162590. 649990 -00000 0.00 501.54 0.00 203922 12/14 GG CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569190 VENDOR 329950 - JAMES COLETTA 20012054 1/16 J COLETTA WAKE UP 001. 010110- 640310 -01005 0.00 17.00 0.00 1/16 J COLETTA WAKE UP NAPLES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569283 VENDOR 900040 - JAMES W & VIRGINIA UMPHRESS 301116 05700726300 UMPHRESS 408 - 000000 - 115001 -00000 0.00 34.44 0.00 UMPHRESS 531 CAPE FLORIDA LN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 568864 VENDOR 116700 - JAMESON SUPPLY INC. 20011578 75379 412. 273511- 652990 -70033 0.00 412 - 273511 - 652990 -70881 0.00 103857 PARTS CHECK NO 569279 VENDOR 900030 - JANET SANCHEZ 301132 1/14 TRVL J SANCHEZ 001 - 156150 - 640200 -00000 0.00 1/14 TRVL J SANCHEZ CHECK NO 569120 VENDOR 292620 - JM TODD, INC. 20011575 69297 101. 163610 - 644620 -00000 0.00 200500 11/28- 12/27/01 CHECK NO 568795 VENDOR 10160 - JOHN COLLINS AUTO PARTS, INC. 20011952 736263 146 - 144380 - 646410 -00000 0.00 150061 PARTS CHECK NO 569248 VENDOR 348490 - JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 20011585 966971 -3 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 203445 PARTS /DISC 0.00 334.00 20011571 726748 334.00 152 - 162541 - 646311 -00000 0.00 24.36 203428 PARTS 24.36 261.73 20011586 973762 CHECK TOTAL 111 - 156332 - 646311 -00000 0.00 25.81 203480 PARTS /DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20011192 954171 - BAL 109 - 182901 - 646311.00000 0.00 0.00 203343 BAL INV 954171 0.00 0.22- 20011586 973762 45.00 111 - 156332. 646311 -00000 0.00 11.13 203480 PARTS /DISC 80.62 0.49- 20011571 728861 152 - 162541 - 646311.00000 0.00 203428 PARTS 20011570 965693 160 - 162518. 646311 -00000 0.00 203429 PARTS /DISC 16J2eAGE 79 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 0.00 334.00 0.00 334.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 334.00 24.36 0.00 24.36 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 24.36 261.73 0.00 261.73 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 261.73 25.81 0.00 25.81 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.81 0.30- 0.00 0.30- 777.29 0.00 777.29 0.22- 0.00 0.22- 45.00 0.00 45.00 11.13 0.00 11.13 80.62 0.00 80.62 0.49- 0.00 0.49- JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20011585 966971 -3 203445 PARTS /DISC 20011586 975548 203480 PARTS /DISC 20011570 965693 203429 PARTS /DISC 20011586 975548 203480 PARTS /DISC COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408 - 253212 - 655100.00000 0.00 111 - 156332 - 646311 -00000 0.00 160 - 162518- 646311 -00000 0.00 111 - 156332 - 646311 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569238 VENDOR 346830 - JOHN ROBERT 20011936 122601 -B 130 - 157710. 634999 -00000 0.00 152185 MAGIC SHOW 12/26 CHECK NO 568849 VENDOR 108280 - JOHNSON CONTROLS, INC. 20011957 11077695 301 - 120435 - 763100.80525 105922 RETROFIT CARD ACCESS 20011957 11077688 301 - 120435. 763100 -80525 105922 RETROFIT CARD ACCESS CHECK NO 568970 VENDOR 193480 - JONES CHEMICAL 20011611 90763 11.80 0.00 408 - 253221 - 652310 -00000 24.46 202571 CAUSTIC SODA 0.00 20011611 90761 0.00 964.22 408 - 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 202571 CAUSTIC SODA 100.00 20011611 90766 0.00 2,993.38 408- 253221 - 652310 -00000 3,296.87 202571 CAUSTIC SODA 3,170.28 20011611 90764 408 - 253221 - 652310 -00000 202571 CAUSTIC SODA 20011611 90765 408. 253221 - 652310 -00000 202571 CAUSTIC SODA 20011611 90760 408 - 253221 - 652310.00000 202571 CAUSTIC SODA 16J2AGE 80 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 15.17 0.00 15.17 11.80 0.00 11.80 24.46 0.00 24.46 0.24- 0.00 0.24 - CHECK TOTAL 0.00 964.22 100.00 0.00 100.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 0.00 987.00 0.00 987.00 0.00 83,434.00 0.00 83,434.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 84,421.00 0.00 3,248.88 0.00 3,248.88 0.00 3,069.90 0.00 3.069.90 0.00 2,826.39 0.00 2,826.39 0.00 2,993.38 0.00 2,993.38 0.00 3,296.87 0.00 3,296.87 0.00 3,170.28 0.00 3,170.28 ri 6J2AGE 81 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20011610 90762 408 - 253211 - 652310.00000 0.00 3,132.15 0.00 202570 CAUSTIC SODA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569319 VENDOR 900080 - JOSE SOBRINHO 301170 AMB.REF.J.SOBRINHO4 /12/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 13.60 0.00 AMB.REF J.SOBRINHO #0119484 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569158 VENDOR 316820 - JOSEPH CHEATHAM 20012062 1/15 -16 TRVL J CHEATHAM 408 - 210120. 640300.00000 0.00 21.00 0.00 1/15.16 TRVL J CHEATHAM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569240 VENDOR 347350 JUAN VARGAS LAWN MAINTENANCE AND 20011946 12101 MAINT 139 - 172531 - 634999 -00000 0.00 750.00 0.00 202929 12101 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569320 VENDOR 900080 JULIEN RUSLANDER 301184 AMB.REF J.RUSLANDER7 /1601 490. 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 59.18 0.00 AMB.REF J.RUSLANDER #0127760-1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569171 VENDOR 322300 - KATHLEEN CASEY 20012204 11/16- 1/24/02 111. 156380 - 634999 -00000 0.00 624.00 0.00 201010 11/16.1/24/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569272 VENDOR 350670 KAY DESELEM 20011939 REIMB 113 - 138312 - 654210 -00000 0.00 347.00 0.00 153353 REIMB CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569291 VENDOR 900050 KAYE HOMES INC. 301120 REF 310140 KAYE HOMES 113 - 000000- 115420 -00000 0.00 10.60 0.00 KAYE HOMES REF 310140 VCHR NET 3,132.15 21,737.85 13.60 13.60 21.00 21.00 750.00 750.00 59.18 59.18 624.00 624.00 347.00 347.00 10.60 6J2AGE 82 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569252 VENDOR 349070 KELLEY SWOFFORD ROY, INC. 20012392 16942 194 - 101540.634999 -10524 0.00 9,000.00 0.00 203733 12101 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569280 VENDOR 900030 KEVIN DUGAN 301130 1/15.16 TRVL K DUGAN 313.163611- 640300 -00000 0.00 21.00 0.00 1/15.16 TRVL K DUGAN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568917 VENDOR 162770 KEYSTONE INTERLOCKING PAVING, INC. 20011956 7138 408 - 253212 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,002.20 0.00 203943 REPAIRS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568973 VENDOR 194110 KILPATRICK TURF EQUIPMENT 20011572 2548500 521 - 122410.646425 -00000 0.00 83.70 0.00 202174 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568841 VENDOR 104750 KIMBO EDUCATIONAL 20012172 K2029722 001 - 156110. 652610.00000 0.00 252.00 001 - 156110. 641950 -00000 0.00 12.60 0.00 152949 PARACHUTES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568993 VENDOR 210340 KINKO'S 20011587 624726 12/13 001 - 156110. 647110 -00000 0.00 288.00 0.00 202234 POSTERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569136 VENDOR 305300 KONE, INC 20011573 15539254 408 - 233312 - 634999 -00000 0.00 106.00 0.00 202198 12/01 VCHR NET 10.60 9,000.00 9,000.00 21.00 21.00 1,002.20 1,002.20 83.70 83.70 264.60 264.60 288.00 288.00 106.00 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 83 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011588 15539255 408 - 253221 - 634999 -00000 0.00 106.00 0.00 106.00 200424 12101 20011954 15539253 001 - 122240 - 646285 -00000 0.00 2,941.96 0.00 2.941.96 201280 12101 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,153.96 CHECK NO 569090 VENDOR 278310 - KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP 20012404 40764116 210 - 939030 - 873850 -00000 0.00 6,000.00 0.00 6.000.00 PARITY & CONSENT LETTERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6.000.00 CHECK NO 568796 VENDOR 10890 - KRAFT CONSTRUCTION 20009971 #1 301. 120402- 762200 -80196 0.00 200,377.47 0.00 200,377.47 202300 TO 12/25/01 20009971 #1 RETAINAGE 301. 000000- 205100 -00000 0.00 19.016.40- 0.00 19,016.40- 202300 TO 12/25/01 RETAINAGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 181.361.07 CHECK NO 568797 VENDOR 10900 - KREHLING INDUSTRIES 20011589 390887 111 - 163645 - 653150 -00000 0.00 309.00 0.00 309.00 201125 CONCRETE 20011589 195224 111 - 163645 - 653150 -00000 0.00 3.50 0.00 3.50 201125 CONCRETE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 312.50 CHECK NO 568985 VENDOR 201000 KRIS JAIN & ASSOCIATES INC. 20011875 0018 -6 412 - 273511 - 634999.70058 0.00 900.00 0.00 900.00 7289 12/01 SVS. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 900.00 CHECK NO 568949 VENDOR 179430 KYLE CONSTRUCTION, INC. 20012176 22 -5 414 - 263611. 634999 -74023 0.00 15,480.00 0.00 15,480.00 106017 CONNECT FIRE SVS 20012174 22 -4 414 - 263611 - 634999 -74023 0.00 15.100.00 0.00 15.100.00 106018 CONNECT FIRE SVS n 6J2PAGE 84 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012175 22 -6 414 - 263611 - 634999 -74023 0.00 15,100.00 0.00 105821 CONNECT FIRE SVS 20012178 22 -10 408.233351- 646980 -00000 0.00 12,976.13 0.00 203983 REPAIR 20012177 22 -9 408 - 233351 - 646980 -00000 0.00 8.625.62 0.00 203982 REPAIR - LUSA LANE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568974 VENDOR 194160 - LABEL IT 20011942 20145 113 - 138930 - 651110 -00000 0.00 72.50 113 - 138930 - 641950 -00000 0.00 4.97 0.00 153096 NUMBERED TICKETS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569266 VENDOR 350510 LAKE COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY 20011580 ILL #832271 001 - 156110 - 649990.00000 0.00 41.95 0.00 153260 LOST BOOK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568955 VENDOR 183340 LARC, INC. 20011943 349440 001 - 172930 - 652990 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 150294 GRADE STAKES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569246 VENDOR 347970 LASALLE COUNTY CIRCUIT CLERK 20012377 PP #9 001 - 000000.218810 -00000 0.00 132.00 0.0C PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.0c CHECK NO 569159 VENDOR 317010 LAUREN BEARD 20012411 1/17 MBA LUNCH -L BEARD 191 - 138785. 654360.33752 0.00 15.00 0.0C L BEARD 1/17 MBA LUNCH CHECK TOTAL 0.0c CHECK NO 568873 VENDOR 128780 - LAW ENGINEERING 20012189 4013528316 111 - 156313 - 649010 -00000 0.00 975.00 0.0c 151892 WATER SLIDE INSPECTION VCHR NET 15,100.00 12,976.13 8,625.62 67,281.75 77.47 77.47 41.95 41.95 25.00 25.00 132.00 132.00 15.00 15.00 975.00 ri 6J2PAGE 85 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568883 VENDOR 135200 LAWN EQUIPMENT CENTER 20011607 48410 109 - 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 406.77 0.00 200406 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569188 VENDOR 329400 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 20011563 8824787 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 281.56 0.00 203633 PARTS 20011563 8824518 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 706.86 0.00 203633 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568799 VENDOR 11170 LEAHCHEM INDUSTRIES. INC. 20012287 19967 408 - 253211 - 652310 -00000 0.00 2,143.50 0.00 203958 DRY POLYMER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568798 VENDOR 11110 LEE CO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 20012289 20195- 155678 12/6 -1/8 101. 163630 - 643100.00000 0.00 73.41 0.00 20195 - 155678 12/6 -1/8 20012289 20195 - 159280 12/19.1/21 111. 156334- 643100 -00000 0.00 79.23 0.00 20195 - 159280 12/19.1/21 20011949 20195.154798AP 1 /11 495 - 192330 - 643100.00000 0.00 760.50 0.00 20195- 154798AP 1 /11 200252 20012289 20195 - 113340 12/14 -1/16 441 - 256110- 643100 -00000 0.00 862.82 0.00 20195 - 113340 12/14 -1/16 20012289 20195 - 154714 1/4/02 146 - 144380- 643100 -00000 0.00 205.73 490 - 144610. 643100 -00000 0.00 134.34 0.00 20195 - 154714 1/4/02 20012289 20195 - 154754 1/23 001 - 013010- 643100 -00000 0.00 611.11 0.00 20195 - 154754 1/23 20012289 20195 - 110589 12/6 -1/8 470. 173442 - 643100 -00000 0.00 93.15 0.00 20195 - 110589 12/6 -1/8 VCHR NET 975.00 406.77 406.77 281.56 706.86 988.42 2,143.50 2,143.50 73.41 79.23 760.50 862.82 340.07 611.11 93.15 6J2AGE 86 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569103 VENDOR 283250 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOES 20011565 635865 101 - 163620- 652140.00000 0.00 80.04 0.00 200951 SAFETY SHOES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568800 VENDOR 11240 LEO'S SOD & LANDSCAPING 20011568 7123 408 - 253212 - 646314 -00000 0.00 79.80 0.00 201993 SOD 20011567 7126 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 159.60 0.00 200879 SOD 20011568 7124 408. 253212. 646314 -00000 0.00 79.80 0.00 201993 SOD 20011566 7127 408 - 253212 - 646314 -00000 0.00 54.00 0.00 200235 SOD 20011567 7146 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 79.80 0.00 200879 SOD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569292 VENDOR 900050 LEONEL RAMIREZ 212272 L RAMIREZ REFUND PYMT PC 001. 121730 - 347912.00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 L RAMIREZ REFUND PYMT PC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568946 VENDOR 174820 LINDA PALMER 20012205 12/3- 1/24/02 111 - 156380 - 634999.00000 0.00 419.25 0.00 201008 12/3- 1/24/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569053 VENDOR 258940 LITTLE CEASARS 20011762 1111102 VINEYARDS 111 - 156390 - 652210.00000 0.00 12.00 0.00 202003 PIZZA 1111102 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568966 VENDOR 193100 LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES 6J2PAGE 87 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012061 REG.J.HUBBARD 2112 001- 010510 - 654360 -00000 0.00 269.00 0.00 153314 REG.J.HUBBARD 2/12 20012222 REGIST L WOOD 2/6/02 001 - 121710. 654360 -00000 0.00 259.00 0.00 153378 REGIST L WOOD 2/6/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569193 VENDOR 331120 - LOUIS V. ROHR 20011893 PRESIDENTS HERO 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 33.90 0.00 153165 PRESIDENTS HERO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569080 VENDOR 272440 LOWE'S HOME IMPROVEMENT WAREHOUSE 20011564 061301092480 408 - 253221 - 652310.00000 0.00 250.11 0.00 202215 SALT PELLETS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568919 VENDOR 164110 LOYAL AMERICAN LIFE INSURANCE CO 20012369 PP #9 001- 000000 - 218400.00000 0.00 218.29 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569133 VENDOR 304720 LYKINS - SIGNTEK, INC 20011606 10536 322 - 183825 - 652990 -00000 0.00 573.00 0.00 203809 REGULATORY SIGN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569226 VENDOR 343930 - M /A -COM RADIO SYSTEMS 20011938 0843909 113 - 138312 - 646610 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 153358 REMOVAL DMX 20011937 0860058 408 - 210151 - 646610 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 153311 REPROGRAM RADIO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568897 VENDOR 148960 - MAC TOOLS 20012171 52768 521 - 122410 - 652910.00000 0.00 95.12 0.00 153349 CREEPER SEAT CHECK NO 569105 VENDOR 285890 - MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERVICES 20012288 30009687 001 - 155410. 634999 -00000 0.00 512.00 0.00 512.00 153361 TEMP JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 88 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011934 51633 521 - 122410 - 652910 -00000 0.00 42.95 0.00 42.95 153328 TOOLS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 138.07 CHECK NO 569094 VENDOR 280100 - MAIL STATION COURIER 20011593 17468 408 - 233351 - 649990 -00000 0.00 90.00 408 - 233352 - 649990 -00000 0.00 90.00 408 - 233312 - 649990 -00000 0.00 90.00 0.00 270.00 200945 12/16 -31/01 20011594 17469 113 - 138312 - 641950 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 201907 12/16 -31/01 20011595 17466 408 - 210151 - 634999.00000 0.00 198.00 0.00 198.00 201914 12/16 -31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 498.00 CHECK NO 568836 VENDOR 100800 - MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERVICES 20011582 30036457 473 - 173413. 634999.00000 0.00 226.40 0.00 226.40 200338 TEMPORARY SERVICES 20011562 30036458 160 - 162518 - 649990.00000 0.00 71.40 0.00 71.40 200263 TEMP 20011562 30026622 160 - 162518- 649990 -00000 0.00 144.90 0.00 144.90 200263 TEMP 20011569 30025065 156- 162723 - 649990 -00000 0.00 65.94 0.00 65.94 200258 TEMPORARY SERVICES 20011584 30036456 408 - 210105. 634999 -00000 0.00 204.80 0.00 204.80 202695 TEMPORARY SERVICES 20011950 30036455 001 - 122240 - 639967 -00000 0.00 665.60 0.00 665.60 201277 TEMPS 20011583 30036459 111 - 163646 - 649990 -00000 0.00 326.33 0.00 326.33 203926 TEMPORARY SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,705.37 CHECK NO 569105 VENDOR 285890 - MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERVICES 20012288 30009687 001 - 155410. 634999 -00000 0.00 512.00 0.00 512.00 153361 TEMP 6J2PAGE 89 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569321 VENDOR 900080 - MAPFRE INSURANCE GROUP 301144 AMB.REF MAPFRE /INS 2/8/01 490.000000- 116004.00000 0.00 65.26 0.00 AMB.REF M.VICTOR #0112519 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568801 VENDOR 11590 - MARCO ACE HARDWARE 20011596 223479 001 - 156363 - 652990.00000 0.00 9.11 0.00 200871 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568803 VENDOR 11770 MARCO ISLAND EAGLE 20011754 ACCT 1023974 SUB 001 - 100130 - 654110 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 153207 SUB CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569255 VENDOR 349730 MARCO ISLAND EQUIPMENT, INC. 20012194 5896 470 - 173442.644600 -00000 0.00 40.00 0.00 152990 RENTAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568871 VENDOR 127090 MARCO OFFICE SUPPLY 20011778 110010511 001 - 156130 - 651910 -00000 0.00 257.22 001 - 156130 - 646710 -00000 0.00 117.53 0.00 203504 SUPPLIES 20011767 110100511 111 - 138317- 651110 -00000 0.00 76.45 0.00 200514 SUPPLIES 20012200 201090704 101. 163612 - 651110 -00000 0.00 23.99 126. 138332 - 651110 -33202 0.00 23.99 0.00 203378 PAPER 20011776 201020685 408. 210105 - 651110.00000 0.00 313.15 0.00 203289 SUPPLIES 20012201 201040679 001- 138710 - 651110 -00000 0.00 55.24 0.00 203634 SUPPLIES 20011768 112070607 113- 138931 - 651110 -00000 0.00 311.00 0.00 200528 SUPPLIES JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2PAGE 90 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011768 111300640 113 - 138931 - 651110 -00000 0.00 62.20 0.00 62.20 200528 SUPPLIES 20011774 112040612 113 - 138722. 651110 -00000 0.00 160.55 0.00 160.55 202845 SUPPLIES 20012206 201070527 109 - 182900- 651110 -00000 0.00 294.99 0.00 294.99 200016 1102 OFFICE SUPPLIES 20011779 201090610 111 - 156310. 651110 -00000 0.00 73.40 0.00 73.40 203510 SUPPLIES 20012196 109270502 126 - 138332. 651110 -33202 0.00 4.14 0.00 4.14 106210 BOOKENDS 20012207 201070765 109 - 182601. 651110 -00000 0.00 121.55 0.00 121.55 200016 1102 OFFICE SUPPLIES 20011763 112100697 490 - 144610 - 651110 -00000 0.00 23.32- 0.00 23.32- 200114 SUPPLIES 20011774 111200691 113 - 138722 - 651110 -00000 0.00 285.79 0.00 285.79 202845 SUPPLIES 20011763 111260609 490 - 144610 - 651110.00000 0.00 23.32 0.00 23.32 200114 SUPPLIES 20011770 201110521 408- 210151 - 651110 -00000 0.00 427.80 0.00 427.80 200860 SUPPLIES 20011772 111270617 470 - 173435. 651110.00000 0.00 218.13 0.00 218.13 201205 SUPPLIES 20011773 112260547 001 - 121152 - 651110 -00000 0.00 217.33 0.00 217.33 201260 SUPPLIES 20012198 112190532 113 - 138900 - 651110 -00000 0.00 959.60 0.00 959.60 200139 PAPER 20011765 201070577 473 - 173413 - 651110 -00000 0.00 43.15 0.00 43.15 200336 SUPPLIES 20011775 201090588 301 - 121125 - 651110 -01017 0.00 71.97 0.00 71.97 202343 SUPPLIES 20011769 110180664 408 - 233351 - 651110 -00000 0.00 84.30 0.00 84.30 200789 SUPPLIES 20012197 110230631 001 - 155110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 37.20 0.00 37.20 200014 RECORDER JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 91 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011764 110300528 001. 100130 - 651110.00000 0.00 8.37- 0.00 8.37- 200205 CREDIT 20012199 112280554 001. 122240. 651110.00000 0.00 228.40 0.00 228.40 201251 TONER 20011766 201090555 001. 101520 - 651110.00000 0.00 39.90 0.00 39.90 200454 SUPPLIES 20011771 110170524 111. 156332- 651110.00000 0.00 78.98 0.00 78.98 200976 SUPPLIES 20011773 112260630 001. 121152. 651110.00000 0.00 611.94 0.00 611.94 201260 SUPPLIES 20011778 110010574 001- 156170. 652990.00000 0.00 249.20 001 - 156110. 646910.00000 0.00 39.00 0.00 288.20 203504 SUPPLIES 20011768 112040535 113- 138931 - 651110.00000 0.00 594.80 0.00 594.80 200528 SUPPLIES 20011777 112120608 408 - 210155 - 651110.00000 0.00 71.97 0.00 71.97 203365 PAPER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,146.49 CHECK NO 568804 VENDOR 12070 MARCO TRUE VALUE, INC. 20011597 276024 470 - 173442 - 652990.00000 0.00 55.28 0.00 55.28 201215 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 55.28 CHECK NO 568868 VENDOR 122850 MARIA G. DELASHMET 20011753 11 /1 01 -520 681 - 421190- 634402.00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 DELASHMET 11 /1 01 -520 20011753 10/18 01 -9208 681 - 431590 - 634402.00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 DELASHMET 10/18 01.9208 20011753 12/26 01 -11792 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 DELASHMET 12/26 01.11792 20011753 10/26 00 -2141 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 DELASHMET 10/26 00.2141 20011753 1112 01 -633 681 - 421190 - 634402.00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 DELASHMET 1112 01.633 n 6J2PAGE 92 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20011753 11 /1 01 -751 681. 421190 - 634402.00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 DELASHMET 11 /1 01 -751 20011753 8/16 01.1090 681. 421190 - 634402.00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 DELASHMET 8/16 01.1090 20011753 11 /01 01.1402 681 - 421190- 634402.00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 DELASHMET 11 /01 01.1402 20011753 12/26 01.11228 681 - 431590- 634402.00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 DELASHMET 12/26 01 -11228 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568857 VENDOR 112410 - MARK A. CASASSA 20011951 R PERRY 01 -1060 681- 421190 - 631020.00000 0.00 850.00 0.00 R PERRY 01 -1060 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569242 VENDOR 347460 - MARK LINDSAY 20012055 11/15 -16 TRVL M.LINDSAY 101- 163620 - 640300.00000 0.00 33.00 0.00 202933 11/15 -16 TRVL M.LINDSAY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568990 VENDOR 204680 MARKING DEVICES 20011598 86581 001 - 000000 - 142900.00000 0.00 23.10 0.00 200058 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569196 VENDOR 331580 MARLENE FOORD 20012065 12/18 -1/15 TRVL M FOORD 111. 138317- 640200.00000 0.00 40.60 0.00 12/18 -1/15 TRVL M FOORD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569322 VENDOR 900080 - MARY BILLIE GODWIN 301168 AMB.REF M.GODWIN 8/20/01 490. 000000- 116004.00000 0.00 60.08 0.00 AMB.REF M.GODWIN #0130615 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569323 VENDOR 900080 - MARY SACCOCCIA 6J2AGE 93 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 301172 AMB.REF.M.SA000CCIA3 /2901 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 215.38 0.00 AMB.REF M.SA000CCIA #0118059 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569145 VENDOR 312600 - MARYLAND CHILD SUPPORT ACCOUNT 20012375 PP #9 001. 000000- 218810 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569007 VENDOR 224910 - MASUNE COMPANY 20012203 680706 111 - 156349.652720 -00000 0.00 240.90 0.00 151967 SUPPLIES 20012202 685346 111 - 156343. 652720 -00000 0.00 247.26 0.00 151972 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569341 VENDOR 900090 - MATT EDWARDS 301117 93.463 TRAVEL -M EDWARDS 681 - 421190.634405 -00000 0.00 265.00 0.00 M EDWARDS TRAVEL 93 -463 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569202 VENDOR 333100 - MATTHEW BENDER 20011599 3417494X 001. 443010 - 654110 -00000 0.00 339.76 0.00 201169 SUPPLEMENTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568802 VENDOR 11700 MATULAYS CONTRACTORS SUPPLY 20011603 309247 109. 182602 - 652990 -00000 0.00 17.20 0.00 200097 WADER BOOTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568806 VENDOR 12200 MCCONNELLS TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 20011592 164593 111. 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 21.98 0.00 200983 SUPPLIES 20011591 164091 001. 156363 - 652990 -00000 0.00 4.84 0.00 200873 SUPPLIES JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2PAGE 94 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011591 163943 001 - 156363 - 652990 -00000 0.00 24.56 0.00 24.56 200873 SUPPLIES 20011592 164741 111 - 156332. 652990 -00000 0.00 13.63 0.00 13.63 200983 SUPPLIES 20011592 164564 111 - 156332. 652990 -00000 0.00 18.06 0.00 18.06 200983 SUPPLIES 20011592 164500 111- 156332. 652990 -00000 0.00 20.65 0.00 20.65 200983 SUPPLIES 20011592 164015 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 31.10 0.00 31.10 200983 SUPPLIES 20011592 164671 111 - 156332 - 652990.00000 0.00 6.65 0.00 6.65 200983 SUPPLIES 20011591 163960 001- 156363 - 652990.00000 0.00 25.15 0.00 25.15 200873 SUPPLIES 20011591 164121 001 - 156363 - 652990 -00000 0.00 25.18 0.00 25.18 200873 SUPPLIES 20011591 163943 001 - 156363 - 652910 -00000 0.00 9.44 0.00 9.44 200873 SUPPLIES 20011590 164802 408- 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 163.45 0.00 163.45 200237 SUPPLIES 20012387 164530 001 - 172930. 652990 -00000 0.00 17.44 0.00 17.44 200522 SUPPLIES 20011941 164637 111 - 163647. 652990 -00000 0.00 35.59 0.00 35.59 152880 KEYS 20011592 164072 111. 156332- 652990 -00000 0.00 8.98 0.00 8.98 200983 SUPPLIES 20011592 164126 111 - 156332 - 652990.00000 0.00 51.88 0.00 51.88 200983 SUPPLIES 20011592 164655 111 - 156332 - 652990.00000 0.00 31.27 0.00 31.27 200983 SUPPLIES 20011940 164665 111 - 163647 - 652990 -00000 0.00 21.84 0.00 21.84 152879 KEYS 20011592 164026 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 19.00 0.00 19.00 200983 SUPPLIES 6J2PAGE 95 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20011592 164562 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 25.69 0.00 200983 SUPPLIES 20011592 164015 111 - 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 14.93 0.00 200983 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569180 VENDOR 326750 MCDONALD TRANSIT ASSOCIATES, INC. 20012179 11U01 126 - 138333 - 634999.33247 0.00 0.00 126 - 138333 - 634999.33725 0.00 25.00 126 - 138333 - 634999.33204 0.00 75.00 0.00 102999 11 /01 BALANCE 20012179 12U01 126 - 138333 - 634999.33247 0.00 0.00 126 - 138333 - 634999.33725 0.00 9,381.58 126 - 138333 - 634999.33204 0.00 28.144.72 0.00 102999 12101 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569089 VENDOR 276820 - MCI 10044073 4IS02897 9/24/01 001- 100110 - 641900 -00000 0.00 14.46 0.00 4IS02897 9/24/01 10042644 4DK66417 9/11/01 113 - 138900 - 641210.00000 0.00 39.47 0.00 4DK66417 9/11/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569324 VENDOR 900080 - MEDICAE 301163 AMB.REF.MEDICARE 3/4/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 232.21 0.00 AMB.REF.P.FERGUSON #0115251 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569183 VENDOR 327370 - MEDICAL DEPARTMENT STORE 20011600 17687 490. 144610 - 652110 -00000 0.00 8.95 0.00 200117 SUPPLIES 20011600 17696 490. 144610- 652110 -00000 0.00 47.50- 0.00 200117 SUPPLIES 20011600 17693 490. 144610 - 652110 -00000 0.00 102.00 0.00 200117 SUPPLIES JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20011600 17686 200117 SUPPLIES 20011600 17691 200117 SUPPLIES 20011600 17538 200117 SUPPLIES 20011600 17692 200117 SUPPLIES 20011600 17615 200117 SUPPLIES 20011600 17689 200117 SUPPLIES 20011600 17695 200117 SUPPLIES 20011600 17688 200117 SUPPLIES 20011600 17690 200117 SUPPLIES 20011600 17694 200117 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 569325 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 490 - 144610 - 652110 -00000 0.00 490 - 144610 - 652110 -00000 0.00 490 - 144610- 652110 -00000 0.00 490 - 144610 - 652110 -00000 0.00 490 - 144610- 652110 -00000 0.00 490 - 144610 - 652110.00000 0.00 490 - 144610- 652110 -00000 0.00 490 - 144610 - 652110 -00000 0.00 490. 144610- 652110 -00000 0.00 490 - 144610 - 652110.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569325 VENDOR 900080 - MEDICARE PART B 301166 AMB.REF MEDICARE 8/10/01 490. 000000- 116004.00000 8.95 AMB.REF K.MANZOLILLO #0129815 -2 0.00 301154 AMB.REF MEDICARE 8/18/01 490 - 000000 - 116004.00000 67.27 AMB.REF J.ELIAS #0130521 -1 0.00 301164 AMB.REF MEDICARE 11/3/01 490 - 000000 - 116004.00000 AMB.REF J.HOLMES #0202731 -1 301165 AMB.REF MEDICARE 10 /11 /01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 AMB.REF D.HORN #0200785 -1 301153 AMB.REF MEDICARE 8/31/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 AMB.REF E.HENNING#0131553 -1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16J2AGE 96 AMT NET VCHR DISC 8.95 0.00 8.95 0.00 102.00- 0.00 8.95 0.00 29.16 0.00 8.95 0.00 47.50 0.00 67.27 0.00 8.95 0.00 105.82 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 236.70 0.00 243.88 0.00 254.66 0.00 243.88 0.00 219.06 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 8.95 8.95 102.00- 8.95 29.16 8.95 47.50 67.27 8.95 105.82 255.95 236.70 243.88 254.66 243.88 219.06 1.198.18 CHECK NO 569293 VENDOR 900050 - MIKE MASLOWSKI JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 97 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 569024 VENDOR 236840 - MEYER LAMINATES. INC. 20011945 961050 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 152.03 0.00 152.03 15185 LUMBER SUPPLIES 20011945 944872 001. 122240- 652989 -00000 0.00 280.80 0.00 280.80 15185 LUMBER SUPPLIES 20011945 948517 001 - 122240 - 652989 -00000 0.00 182.66 0.00 182.66 15185 LUMBER SUPPLIES 20011945 962257 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 39.05 0.00 39.05 15185 LUMBER SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 654.54 CHECK NO 569241 VENDOR 347450 MICHAEL STONE 20012075 11/15.16 TRVL M STONE 101. 163620 - 640300 -00000 0.00 77.65 0.00 77.65 11/15.16 TRVL M STONE 202930 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 77.65 CHECK NO 568991 VENDOR 205860 MIDWEST TAPE EXCHANGE 20011601 407557 307 - 156110 - 652670.00000 0.00 119.94 0.00 119.94 201637 VIDEOS 20011601 407376 307 - 156110 - 652670.00000 0.00 448.75 0.00 448.75 201637 VIDEOS 20011601 410102 307 - 156110 - 652670 -00000 0.00 143.91 0.00 143.91 201637 VIDEOS 20011601 407377 307 - 156110- 652670 -00000 0.00 271.76 0.00 271.76 201637 VIDEOS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 984.36 CHECK NO 568807 VENDOR 12710 MIDWEST TITLE GUARANTEE 20012388 39122TP -OE 408 - 210151. 634999 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 153385 0 & E 20012388 39086TP -OE 408- 210151 - 634999 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 153385 0 & E CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.00 CHECK NO 569293 VENDOR 900050 - MIKE MASLOWSKI 6J2PAGE 98 JANUARY 30. 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 301190 REFUND PARKS - MASLOWSKI 670 - 000000 - 220010.00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 MASLOWSKI REFUND PARKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569326 VENDOR 900080 - MILTON WILSON 301137 AMB.REF M.WILSON 3/4/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 47.14 0.00 AMB.REF M.WILSON #0115301 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569268 VENDOR 350580 - MINNESOTA CHILD SUPPORT 20012379 PP #9 001 - 000000- 218810 -00000 0.00 109.66 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569049 VENDOR 256580 MINOLTA CORPORATION 20011602 B122681447 111 - 156349 - 646710 -00000 0.00 180.95 0.00 201722 12101 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569147 VENDOR 313560 MIRANDA PRESS, INC. 20011579 0908 681 - 421510 - 654110.00000 0.00 29.00 681 - 421510 - 641950.00000 0.00 3.00 0.00 153090 FL SENTENCING GUIDELINES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569035 VENDOR 250350 MISDU 20012372 PP #9 001. 000000- 218810.00000 0.00 80.00 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569247 VENDOR 348130 MISTER FIX -IT HANDYMAN SERVICES 20011608 11/6/01 SAND BLASTING 470.173435- 634999 -00000 0.00 2,885.00 0.00 203238 SAND BLASTING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568874 VENDOR 129260 MITCHELL & STARK CONSTRUCTION JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20010521 #5 FINAL RETAINAGE 7200 FINAL RETAINAGE 20010521 #5 FINAL 7200 FINAL 20011871 #2 105304 10/31/01 THRU 12121101 20011871 #2 RETAINAGE 105304 10/31- 12/21/01 RETAINAGE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 6 JlAGE 99 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 412 - 000000- 205100 -00000 0.00 1.293.97- 0.00 412 - 273511. 763100 -70890 0.00 25,879.39 0.00 414 - 263611. 763100 -73067 0.00 126,710.00 0.00 414 - 000000. 205100 -00000 0.00 12,671.00- 0.00 322.73 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569342 VENDOR 900090 - MLP REPORTING, INC. 301100 DEPO 00 -1216 ST VS KIPP 681 - 421190 - 634401.00000 0.00 MLP REPTG 00.1216 R KIPP CHECK NO 568808 VENDOR 12900 - MOBIL OIL CREDIT CORP 20011953 85902710787 1/7/02 521 - 122450 - 652410.00000 0.00 202219 FUEL 1/7/02 CHECK NO 569274 VENDOR 350700 - MOBILE SATELLITE VENTURES, INC 20012386 100 - 001 -4632 11/21 118- 144210 - 634999.33781 0.00 204108 11121 100- 001.4632 20012386 100 - 001 -4632 12121 118 - 144210. 634999.33781 0.00 204108 12121 100 - 001 -4632 CHECK NO 568906 VENDOR 156390 - MOCK ENGINEERING INC. 20012389 22510 408 - 253221 - 634999.00000 0.00 151659 REPAIRS CHECK NO 569276 VENDOR 350850 - MULHOLLAND BAIL BONDS 20012193 00 -9689 SHAWN MARCUM 001- 431510 - 351100 -00000 0.00 S MARCUM 00 -9689 BOND ESTREATURE VCHR NET 1,293.97- 25,879.39 126,710.00 12,671.00- 138,624.42 41.56 0.00 41.56 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 41.56 1,070.30 0.00 1.070.30 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,070.30 135.72 0.00 135.72 187.01 0.00 187.01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 322.73 289.74 0.00 289.74 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 289.74 950.00 0.00 950.00 6J2AGE 100 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012193 99.6484 ROGELIO SANMIGUEL 001 - 431510 - 351100.00000 0.00 1,900.00 0.00 R SAN MIGUEL 99 -6484 BOND EST. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568809 VENDOR 13000 MUNICIPAL SUPPLY & SIGN CO 20011892 075712 101 - 163630 - 653710 -00000 0.00 5,561.50 0.00 200032 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569327 VENDOR 900080 MUTUAL PROTECTIVE INSURANCE COMPANY 301145 AMB.REF MUTUAL INS 8/17 490 - 000000- 116004.00000 0.00 60.98 0.00 AMB.REF V.CHAINAS #0130415 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568904 VENDOR 155630 - NACO /SOUTHEAST 20012363 PP #9 001- 000000 - 217001 -00000 0.00 30,187.38 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568951 VENDOR 180690 - NAPLES AIR FORCE 20011839 534575 001 - 155410 - 652990 -00000 0.00 198.65 001 - 155410 - 641950 -00000 0.00 6.79 0.00 152869 - SUPPLIES, 12127 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568810 VENDOR 13080 - NAPLES ARMATURE WORKS 20011833 63198 408 - 253221 - 652990 -00000 0.00 117.00 0.00 202214 PARTS, 1/3 20011836 63098 109 - 182901 - 652990.00000 0.00 190.00 0.00 202368 EQUIPMENT PARTS, 12/24 20011835 62974 109 - 182901 - 652990.00000 0.00 31.55 0.00 202368 PUMP FITTINGS 12/14 20011832 63165 408 - 253211 - 655100 -00000 0.00 85.50 0.00 201804 BELTS, 12/31 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 569172 VENDOR 322650 - NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN 20012191 1/18/02 - #2 193 - 101541. 882100 -10283 0.00 203637 OCT & NOV 2001 16J2PAGE 101 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 58,104.45 0.00 58,104.45 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 58,104.45 CHECK NO 569059 VENDOR 259460 - NAPLES COURT REPORTING, INC. 20011828 7208 681. 410310. 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 WILLIAMS,R /01.842CFA 20011829 6688 681- 410310 - 633043.00000 0.00 87.00 0.00 87.00 SIMMER,W /01- 2777CFA 20011829 7257 681 - 410310 - 633032.00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 ENQUIST /01- 1360CJ 20011827 6998 -3 681 - 410310. 633052.00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 KIPP.R /00- 1216CFA 20011827 T -2512 681 - 410310 - 633063 -00000 0.00 33.00 0.00 33.00 SINGLETON /98- 2510CFA 20012416 T2504 SINGLETON /98- 2150CF 681 - 410310 - 633063 -00000 0.00 39.00 0.00 39.00 T2504 SINGLETON /98 2150CFA 20012343 7094 -2 681 - 410310 - 633051 -00000 0.00 112.00 0.00 112.00 GORE.R /00- 2916CF 20012343 7012 -2 681 - 410310 - 633051 -00000 0.00 92.80 0.00 92.80 GORE,R /00.2916CF 20011827 7222 681 - 410310. 633032.00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 HENDERSON.K /01.1689CP 20011827 7221 681 - 410310 - 633032.00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 KEMP.T /01- 1648CFA 20011829 6876.2 681 - 410310. 633042 -00000 0.00 141.00 0.00 141.00 HERNANDEZ,J /00- 2944CFA 20011827 7255 681. 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 GILES,L /01- 863CFA 20011829 7288 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 KIPP.R /01- 1216CFA 20011828 7266 681- 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 FORBES,B /00- 2849CFA JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2PAGE 102 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012343 7070 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 PEREZ,G /01.813CF 20012343 T -2465 681- 410310. 633063 -00000 0.00 39.00 0.00 39.00 VERRET /96 -218CF 20011828 7946 681 - 410310 - 633032.00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 NEILSON /01- 247CFA 20011827 7254 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 HERNANDEZ,J /01- 765CFA 20012416 6688 -1 SINNER /002777CFA 681 - 410310 - 633051 -00000 0.00 23.20 0.00 23.20 6688 -1 SINNER /002777CFA 20012343 7042 681 - 410310. 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 HIDALGO.P /01 -659CF 20011829 6680 -1 681 - 410310. 633042 -00000 0.00 105.00 0.00 105.00 HERNANDEZ,J /00- 2944CFA 20011829 7950 -1 681. 410310 - 633042 -00000 0.00 57.00 0.00 57.00 COLES.R /01- 1235CFA 20011827 T -2473 681 - 410310 - 633062.00000 0.00 51.00 0.00 51.00 AYALA /00- 494CFA 20011827 7122 -1 681 - 410310 - 633043 -00000 0.00 312.00 0.00 312.00 THERIN /01- 873CFA 20011829 7256 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 MAGARGAL,B /01- 2162CFA 20012343 6876 -3 681 - 410310 - 633041.00000 0.00 37.60 0.00 37.60 HERNANDEZ,J /00.2944CF 20011827 6779.2 681 - 410310 - 633051.00000 0.00 59.20 0.00 59.20 KIPP,R /00- 1216CFA 20011827 T -2507 681 - 410310 - 633053 -00000 0.00 13.20 0.00 13.20 RICHEMOND /99- 1656CFA 20011827 7291 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 HERNANDEZ,D /01- 1322CFA 20011829 7244 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 MOBLEY,D /01- 201CFA 20011829 7239 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 UBERTACCIO /01- 877CFA JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 103 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20011829 7273 681. 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 SONNENBERG /01- 1734CFA 20011829 6688 681 - 410310 - 633033.00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 SIMMER.W /01.2777CFA 20011829 7297 681 - 410310. 633032.00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 JIMENEZ.A /01- 10990MMA 20011827 6616.1 681- 410310. 633042 -00000 0.00 111.00 0.00 111.00 BYRGE /01- 349CFA 20011827 7933.1 681 - 410310 - 633042.00000 0.00 243.00 0.00 243.00 VARDOULIOUS /01- 1009CFA 20011828 7209 681- 410310. 633032.00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 WILLIAMS,R /00- 2945CFA 20011828 7281 681. 410310. 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 NESMITH /00- 316CFA 20011829 7270 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 CARTER.0 /01.1985CFA 20011828 7253 681 - 410310. 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 FORBES.B /00- 2849CFA 20011829 7293 681- 410310. 633032.00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 TIBOLET /01- 1794CP 20012343 7089 -2 681 - 410310 - 633051 -00000 0.00 99.20 0.00 99.20 GORE,R /00.2916CF 20012343 7077 -2 681- 410310 - 633051 -00000 0.00 48.00 0.00 48.00 ZEIGLER,W /01.679CF 20011828 7269 681 - 410310 - 633032.00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 HENDERSON,D /01.1748CP 20011829 7240 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 AGUILAR.R /01- 1483CFA 20011827 T -2498 681 - 410310 - 633062 -00000 0.00 42.00 0.00 42.00 MEEKS /01- 992CFA 20011827 7158 -2 681 - 410310. 633042 -00000 0.00 273.00 0.00 273.00 BEAUCHAMP /01- 231CFA 20012343 8001 681- 410310 - 633031 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 MCGEE /01 -579CF JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1977805/050862 681 - 421510 - 648160 -00000 15.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 20012103 1982183/029507 FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 20012343 T -2089 681 - 410310- 633061 -00000 0.00 20011840 VERRET /96 -218CF 198- 157410 - 648160 -00000 0.00 20012343 5792 -2 681- 410310 - 633051.00000 0.00 001 - 100130 - 648160.00000 BALDOMINGO /00- 1659CF 200206 AD 1/5 -7 0.00 20011827 7295 681. 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 200213 ADS 1/5 -7 KIPP,R /01- 1216CFA 20011829 7210 681. 410310. 633032 -00000 0.00 WILLIAMS,J /01- 712CFA 20011828 7268 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 REYES,J /01- 1411CFA 20012416 T 2300 CONSTAINTINEELAL 681 - 410310. 633041 -00000 0.00 T230000NSTAINTINELLAL 00 -1326 CFA CHECK NO 568861 VENDOR 115170 - NAPLES CUSTOM HITCH & TRAILER SALES 20011834 47509 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 200917 PARTS, 1/8 20011834 47432 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 200917 BATTERY, 1/4 CHECK NO 568811 VENDOR 13300 - NAPLES DAILY NEWS 20012341 1977805/050862 681 - 421510 - 648160 -00000 15.00 201318 ADS FOR 12102 15.00 20012103 1982183/029507 495 - 192310. 648160 -00000 30.00 200413 - ADS, 1/5 -7 30.00 20012337 1985648/1230 001 - 100130. 649100 -00000 234.00 200213 ADS 1/12.14 234.00 20011840 1976986 198- 157410 - 648160 -00000 0.00 152791 - AD, 12/13 0.00 20012335 1982171/1230 001 - 100130 - 648160.00000 0.00 200206 AD 1/5 -7 0.00 20012337 1982172/1230 001 - 100130- 649100.00000 200213 ADS 1/5 -7 16J2PAGE 104 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 30.00 0.00 30.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 234.00 0.00 234.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3.322.20 0.00 99.81 0.00 99.81 0.00 29.65 0.00 29.65 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 129.46 0.00 99.60 0.00 99.60 0.00 31.26 0.00 31.26 0.00 83.07 0.00 83.07 0.00 495.00 0.00 495.00 0.00 2,542.20 0.00 2,542.20 0.00 267.60 0.00 267.60 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 105 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012104 1983799/057522 126 - 138332- 649100 -33202 0.00 45.39 0.00 45.39 106212 - AD, 1/9 20012105 1982169 113 - 138312 - 649100 -00000 0.00 233.79 0.00 233.79 200466 - ADS, 1/5 -7 20012106 1982090/057522 126 - 138332 - 649100 -33202 0.00 48.53 0.00 48.53 106212 - AD, 1/4 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,846.44 CHECK NO 568848 VENDOR 108150 - NAPLES DAILY NEWS 20012107 1975271/001230 325 - 172972 - 649100 -31212 0.00 210.24 0.00 210.24 152483 - ADS, 12/22 -24 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 210.24 CHECK NO 569181 VENDOR 326860 - NAPLES DAILY NEWS 20012101 1983453/001230 195 - 110406 - 649100 -10509 0.00 127.03 0.00 127.03 152396 - AD, 1/8 20012102 1983452/001230 413 - 263611 - 649100 -73077 0.00 79.93 0.00 79.93 152826 - AD, 1/8 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 206.96 CHECK NO 568812 VENDOR 13370 - NAPLES FEED & SEED, INC. 20011831 16837 001 - 155410 - 652210.00000 0.00 219.93 0.00 219.93 202452 FOOD & SUPPLIES, 12/28 20011831 16853 001. 155410 - 652210.00000 0.00 266.58 0.00 266.58 202452 FOOD & SUPPLIES, 1/4 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 486.51 CHECK NO 568813 VENDOR 13580 NAPLES LUMBER AND SUPPLY 20011838 72771 495 - 192370 - 652990 -00000 0.00 154.14 0.00 154.14 153069 - LUMBER, 12/5 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 154.14 CHECK NO 568814 VENDOR 13650 NAPLES OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 20012424 QUATRALE,A - 12/14/01 001 - 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 79.30 0.00 79.30 201880 - QUATRALE 12/14 6J2PAGE 106 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568847 VENDOR 107670 - NAPLES PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES 20012425 CALANA,M - 12/11/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 165.10 0.00 203273 - CALANA, 12/11 20012425 CALANA,M - 12/11/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 239.85 0.00 203273 - CALANA, 12/11 20012425 CROSBY,L - 11/16/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 221.00 0.00 203273 - CROSBY. 11/16 20012425 FREDERICK.0 - 12/1/01 001 - 155930 - 631990.00000 0.00 56.32 0.00 203273 - FREDERICK, 12/1 20012425 FREDERICK,C - 1211101 001 - 155930 - 631990.00000 0.00 31.75 0.00 203273 - FREDERICK, 1211 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569229 VENDOR 344670 - NAPM FLORIDA SUN COAST, INC. 20012340 202043 001 - 121710 - 654210 -00000 0.00 130.00 0.00 153381 MEMBER FEE -R GEORGE 20012224 REGIST CARNELL / TIBBETTS 001 - 121710 - 654370 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 153317 REGIST S CARNELL /R TIBBETTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569119 VENDOR 292110 - NATIONAL ASSOC. OF WOMEN JUDGES 20012351 MEMBR ID#7932 JUDGE ELLIS 001 - 421070 - 654210 -00000 0.00 150.00 0.00 153238 JUDGE ELLIS MEMBER DUES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568884 VENDOR 135670 - NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CENTER 20012347 2002 ZIP CODE - PO DIR 408 - 210151 - 654110 -00000 0.00 89.90 0.00 153307 2001 ZIP CODE /PO DIRECTORY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568865 VENDOR 120590 - NATIONAL REGISTER PUBLISHING CO. INC 20011826 320579 355. 156190- 766100.00000 0.00 1,428.68 0.00 203858 - BOOKS 6J2AGE 107 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569328 VENDOR 900080 - NEIGHBORHOOD HEALTH PARTNERSHIP 301149 AMB.REF NEIGHBOR 7/1/00 490 - 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 310.00 0.00 AMB.REF C.MENDEZ #0023695 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569217 VENDOR 339580 - NEW YORK SCU 20012376 PP #9 001 - 000000- 218810 -00000 0.00 87.00 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569017 VENDOR 231970 - NEWSPRESS PUBLISHING, CO. 20011837 ACCT #3497859 -SUBS RNW'L 001 - 100130 - 654110.00000 0.00 132.29 0.00 153208 - SUBSCRIPTION RENW'L CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569109 VENDOR 286930 - NEXTEL 20011842 0022001545 -7 11/25.12/24 144 - 144360 - 641700 -00000 0.00 2.61 0.00 152034 - 0022001545 -7 11/25. 12/24/01 20011843 0022312584 -0 11/25.12/24 146 - 144380 - 641700.00000 0.00 54.21 0.00 150066 - 0022312584 -0 11/25. 12/24/02 20011841 0002111604 -1 12/2. 1/1/02 001. 443010 - 641700 -00000 0.00 192.54 0.00 203023 - 0002111604 -1 12/2- 1/1/02 20012338 0002170210 -5 12/15.1/14 518 - 121630- 641700.00000 0.00 142.31 516 - 121650- 641700.00000 0.00 199.35 0.00 202218 12/15.1/14 2170210 -5 20012339 001855146 -5 12/15.1/14 001 - 122240 - 641700.00000 0.00 746.08 0.00 201275 12/15.1/14 1855146 -5 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568816 VENDOR 14080 - NOLAND 20012346 N- 0071680FL 001 - 122240 - 652995 -00000 0.00 164.45 0.00 151535 WATER HEATER -GG LIBRARY 20012346 N- 0072247FL 001. 122240- 652995 -00000 0.00 164.45 0.00 151535 WATER HEATER -2685 HORSESHOE 6J2AGE 108 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569142 VENDOR 310560 NORA SEHEULT 20012357 10/18/01 1 HR 681 - 421190. 634402 -00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 SEHEULT 1 HR 10/18/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568815 VENDOR 14060 NORTH COLLIER ANIMAL CLINIC 20011830 01 -9480 MARTIN,J 610 - 155410 - 631970.00000 0.00 15.00 0.00 201049 - 01 -9480 MARTIN,J CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568975 VENDOR 194360 - OFFICE MAX #159 20012359 240J362/601118001227258 408 - 233312 - 651950 -00000 0.00 660.95 0.00 152669 DIGITAL CAMERA & SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569213 VENDOR 338800 OHIO CHILD SUPPORT PAYMENT CENTRAL 20012374 PP #9 001 - 000000. 218810 -00000 0.00 117.69 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569123 VENDOR 295210 ORTINO ENTERPRISES 20011845 3829 001 - 010510- 634801 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 152944 - SUBPOENA SERVICES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568899 VENDOR 151660 OXBRIDGE COMMUNICATIONS INC. 20011825 101062 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 1,144.50 0.00 203873 - BOOKS, 112 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569232 VENDOR 345120 PAIN ENTERPRISES, INC. 20011850 A1252072 111- 156313 - 652311.00000 0.00 454.98 0.00 201572 - CO2 & DELIVERY, 12/31 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J2 PAGE 109 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 569329 VENDOR 900080 - PALMETTO GBA /RAILROAD MEDICARE 301147 AMB.REF PALMETTO 11/30/00 490 - 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 145.71 0.00 AMB.REF D.SUMMERTON #0105341 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568987 VENDOR 202340 - PANTHER PRINTING 20012342 3647 681. 431310. 647110 -00000 0.00 396.00 0.00 201333 BUS CARDS 12/18 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569031 VENDOR 247350 - PEDERSEN PRINTING 20011854 1505 001 - 000000 - 142900.00000 0.00 32.00 0.00 200053 BUS. CARDS - KOMORNY 20011854 1506 001. 000000 - 142900 -00000 0.00 32.00 0.00 200053 BUS. CARDS - MEDIAVILLA 20011853 1508 113 - 138930 - 647110 -00000 0.00 114.00 0.00 152855 BUSINESS CARDS, 1/2 20011823 1509 001. 156110. 647110 -00000 0.00 1.024.00 0.00 203753 BUSINESS CARDS, 1/2 20011854 1503 001 - 000000 - 142900 -00000 0.00 32.00 0.00 200053 BUS. CARDS -NAGY 20011854 1504 001 - 000000 - 142900.00000 0.00 32.00 0.00 200053 BUS. CARDS - WALKER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569141 VENDOR 310530 - PERKIN ELMER INSTRUMENTS 20012336 CS5946.1 001 - 122255. 646970 -00000 0.00 1,792.00 0.00 202973 MAINT AGREE 10/01 -9/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569281 VENDOR 900030 - PETER HAYDEN 301131 11/28 -29 TRVL P HAYDEN 001 - 172970 - 640300.00000 0.00 29.75 0.00 11/28 -29 TRVL P HAYDEN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6J2AGE 110 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 569178 VENDOR 325990 - PETS PLUS 20011851 136239 112102 001 - 156363. 652255 -00000 0.00 51.78 0.00 203661 - FOOD SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569236 VENDOR 346290 - PFIZER INC. 20011846 4279518 001. 155410.652710 -00000 0.00 237.20 0.00 153163 MEDICINE, 1/9 20011846 4279518 001 - 155410.652710 -00000 0.00 1.18- 0.00 153163 112% DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569251 VENDOR 349060 PHASE V OF SW FLORIDA 20012395 3463 194 - 101540- 634999 -10525 0.00 3.388.70 0.00 203734 12101 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569002 VENDOR 217960 PHIL BURNHAM SUPPLY 20012114 408 408 - 253212 - 655200 -00000 0.00 84.00 0.00 200242 DRILLING SCREWS, 1/2 20012113 412 408 - 233312.652910.00000 0.00 47.66 0.00 202029 PARTS, 1/4 20012113 407A 408 - 233312 - 652910 -00000 0.00 84.00 0.00 202029 DRILLING SCREWS, 112 20012112 407B 408- 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 168.00 0.00 200758 DRILLING SCREWS, 1/2 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569156 VENDOR 316240 - PINEGATE VETERINARY CENTER 20011824 155997 001 - 155410 - 631980 -00000 0.00 348.75 0.00 203768 01 -14013 12/21 20011824 155999 001. 155410 - 631980 -00000 0.00 94.00 0.00 203768 01 -14762 12121 20011824 155964 001 - 155410 - 631980 -00000 0.00 227.00 0.00 203768 01 -14783 12120 JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20011824 156680 203768 01 -14785 1/18 20011824 155540 203768 01 -14443 11/30 20011824 156679 203768 01.14832 1/18 20011824 155995 203768 01 -14307 12121 20011824 155998 203768 01 -14529 12121 20011824 156000 203768 01 -3090 12121 20011824 155994 203768 01 -14397 12/21 20011824 156001 203768 01 -14832 12121 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 155410 - 631980.00000 0.00 001 - 155410 - 631980 -00000 0.00 001. 155410 - 631980.00000 0.00 001 - 155410. 631980 -00000 0.00 001 - 155410. 631980 -00000 0.00 001- 155410 - 631980.00000 0.00 001 - 155410- 631980 -00000 0.00 001 - 155410. 631980 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569062 VENDOR 260210 - PIONEER - KAISER INC 20011852 83334 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 202829 - PARTS, 1/2 CHECK NO 569137 VENDOR 305460 - PITNEY BOWES CREDIT CORPORATION 20012100 4673225 -DCO1 109 - 182601 - 641950.00000 0.00 109 - 182900 - 641950 -00000 0.00 778 - 182700 - 641950 -00000 0.00 200103 -RENT POSTAGE METER, 1/20.4/20 CHECK NO 569231 VENDOR 344980 - PMI IMAGING SYSTEMS OF FLORIDA 20012348 6797 408 - 210151 - 646710 -00000 0.00 201523 9/01.9/02 CHECK NO 568741 VENDOR 15130 - POSTMASTER 16J2AGE 111 AMT NET VCHR DISC 40.50 0.00 70.72 0.00 85.25 0.00 175.20 0.00 280.00 0.00 18.00 0.00 414.60 0.00 403.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 724.74 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 55.66 55.66 55.66 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 880.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 40.50 70.72 85.25 175.20 280.00 18.00 414.60 403.00 2.157.02 724.74 724.74 166.98 166.98 880.00 880.00 JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012413 PERMIT #499 AND COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408 - 210151 - 641950 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569046 VENDOR 255770 - PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST,LLC 7.95 20012095 PJ152018 109 - 182901- 644600 -00000 0.00 0.00 200105 - RENT WELDING TANK, 12/31 49.90 0.00 20012099 PJ152020 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 25.80 200924 - GAS CYLINDERS. 12/31 25.80 22.10 20012096 PJ159671 490. 144610 - 652720 -00000 0.00 39.00 201407 - OXYGEN. 1/2 0.00 29.95 20012099 PJ129333 521 - 122410. 646415 -00000 0.00 0.00 200924 - GAS CYLINDERS. 11/30 88.97 0.00 20012096 PJ152022 490 - 144610 - 652720.00000 0.00 814.00 201407 - CYL RENT, 12/31 814.00 20012350 PJ152021 408 - 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 201135 WELDING SUPPLIES 12/31 20012098 PJ152023 408 - 253211. 652990 -00000 0.00 201815 - WELDING SUPPLIES, 12/31 20012094 PJ159337 114. 178975- 652910.00000 0.00 200347 - RENTAL 12/31 20012099 PJ160892 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 200924 - PARTS, 1/7 20011847 PJ147606 001 - 156363 - 652990 -00000 0.00 152619 - OXYGEN & PARTS, 12/27 20012097 PJ160231 111 - 156332 - 646313.00000 0.00 201040 - CARBON DIOXIDE, 1/4 20012349 PJ145693 001. 122240- 652990 -00000 0.00 152720 SUPPLIES 12/20 CHECK NO 569071 VENDOR 264400 - PREFERRED TRAVEL OF NAPLES 20012358 208818 - FOR MCDANIEL 681 - 421190. 634405 -00000 0.00 01- 2392CFA /PARKS.L 16J2AGE 112 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 14,094.41 0.00 14.094.41 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 14,094.41 7.95 0.00 7.95 51.57 0.00 51.57 60.00 0.00 60.00 49.90 0.00 49.90 269.96 0.00 269.96 25.80 0.00 25.80 22.10 0.00 22.10 39.00 0.00 39.00 29.95 0.00 29.95 17.19 0.00 17.19 18.83 0.00 18.83 88.97 0.00 88.97 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 681.22 814.00 0.00 814.00 6J2AGE 113 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012358 208820 FOR R.LOBER 681 - 421190 - 634405.00000 0.00 195.00 0.00 00- 2392CFA /PARKS,L CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568887 VENDOR 138230 - PRIDE OF FLORIDA, INC. 20012111 ZI081284 001 - 000000 - 142900.00000 0.00 135.00 0.00 200052 - PRINTING, 1/3 20012111 ZI081371 001 - 000000- 142900 -00000 0.00 27.00 0.00 200052 - PRINTING, 1/4 20012111 ZI081453 001 - 000000. 142900 -00000 0.00 200.00 0.00 200052 - PRINTING, 1/4 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568943 VENDOR 174760 - PROCRAFT BATTERIES 20012109 153406 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 180.80 0.00 200698 - BATTERIES, 1/4 20012109 425131829 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 41.09 0.00 200698 - BATTERIES, 1/4 20012109 421351832 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 343.08 0.00 200698 - BATTERIES, 1/7 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569077 VENDOR 267130 - PROFESSIONAL BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. 20012360 29487 412 - 273511. 634999 -70059 0.00 9,975.00 0.00 202709 STAIR REPLACEMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569166 VENDOR 320540 PROLIME CORPORATION 20012108 7297 408. 253211 - 634999 -00000 0.00 2,340.00 0.00 200395 - LIME. 12/31 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569176 VENDOR 325880 PROSOURCE ONE 20012093 07211300 109. 182602 - 652310 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 153147 - RED DYE JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012093 07211200 CM 201662 - CREDIT RETURN 20012093 07139200 201662 - RED DYE 20012093 07211200 CM 201662 - CREDIT RETURN 20012093 07211300 201662 - GARLON 20012093 07139200 201662 - GARLON COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 109 - 182602. 652310 -00000 0.00 109. 182602 - 652310 -00000 0.00 109 - 182602. 652310 -00000 0.00 109. 182602- 652310 -00000 0.00 109 - 182602. 652310 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569144 VENDOR 312210 - PROVIDENT CAPITOL GROUP, INC. 20012345 9554332 BAL 001 - 157110. 644620 -00000 0.00 201607 BAL 1102 20012345 9614738 001 - 157110 - 644620.00000 0.00 201607 2102 CHECK NO 569249 VENDOR 349040 - PRUTOS PUBLIS RELATIONS. INC. 20012436 1/16/02 194 - 101540 - 634999.10526 0.00 203735 1/1.15/02 20012436 1/8/02 194 - 101540 - 634999 -10526 0.00 203735 12101 CHECK NO 569148 VENDOR 314210 - PSI 20012354 552- 1G073 -B 107022 SVS FOR 12101 20012355 552- 1G052 -B 105521 TASK 1, PH 2 470. 173410. 634999 -73080 0.00 470 - 173410 - 634999 -73080 0.00 CHECK NO 568907 VENDOR 158120 - PUBLIX #410 20012090 I- 03919513/234100000 130. 157710- 652210 -00000 0.00 202020 - FOOD, 112 16J2AGE 114 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 100.00- 0.00 100.00- 100.00 0.00 100.00 202.50- 0.00 202.50- 195.73 0.00 195.73 202.50 0.00 202.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 295.73 9.00 0.00 9.00 354.91 0.00 354.91 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 363.91 6,000.00 0.00 6.000.00 12,000.00 0.00 12.000.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 18,000.00 13,490.00 0.00 13,490.00 6,341.00 0.00 6.341.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 19.831.00 11.15 0.00 11.15 6J2AGE 115 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA I REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569069 VENDOR 263260 - PUBLIX SUPER MARKETS #0076 20012089 I- 03865800/321600600 001. 156130- 652210 -00000 0.00 51.26 0.00 200894 - FOOD SUPPLIES, 1/3 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568891 VENDOR 144550 - PYRAMID II JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 20012091 298579 408. 233352- 652510 -00000 0.00 74.88 0.00 202538 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES, 12/28 20012092 298582 408 - 253212 - 652510.00000 0.00 86.95 0.00 200243 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES, 12/28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569081 VENDOR 272640 QUALITY CONTROL BUILDERS, INC 20012434 #9 497 - 192340 - 763100.33010 0.00 13,294.00 0.00 102685 THRU 1/3/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568855 VENDOR 111620 QUALITY COPY ACQUISITION,CORP 20012356 15338 681 - 421190 - 634401.00000 0.00 84.51 0.00 01- 1344CF HOLT, D CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568988 VENDOR 202830 QUICK KEY LOCKSMITH SERVICES 20012344 B11785 001. 122240- 639965 -00000 0.00 132.60 0.00 201542 SVS 1/3 20012344 B11827 001 - 122240 - 639965.00000 0.00 151.11 0.00 201542 SVS 1 /11 20012344 B11794 001. 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 37.90 0.00 201542 SUS 1/9 20012344 B11795 001 - 122240. 639965 -00000 0.00 36.00 0.00 201542 SVS 1/9 20012344 B11782 001 - 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 4.40 0.00 201542 SVS 1/6 JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012344 B11793 201542 SUS 1/9 20012344 611792 201542 SVS 1/9 20012344 B11784 201542 SVS 1/2 20012344 B11826 201542 SUS 1/9 20012344 B11788 201542 SVS 1/7 20012344 B11783 201542 SUS 12/31 20012344 811781 201542 SVS 1/6 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 568818 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 001. 122240 - 639965.00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 639965 -00000 0.00 001. 122240- 639965 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 568818 VENDOR 15730 RECORDED BOOKS, LLC. 0.00 20012120 1058230 129. 156110- 652670 -33774 0.00 85.00 203924 RECORDED BOOKS 183.78 0.00 CHECK NO 569083 VENDOR 275110 REDDY ICE CORPORATION 55.00 20012134 115066 85.00 408. 233351. 652990 -00000 0.00 29.40 202249 ICE 946.89 1,479.20 20012133 110779 CHECK TOTAL 408- 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 200245 ICE 20012134 115128 408 - 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 202249 ICE CHECK NO 568959 VENDOR 186510 - RICCARDO B. RIVAS, PHD. 20012084 10:5 PSP EMS 12/4 -12/13 490 - 144610 - 631210 -00000 0.00 153164 PHYS.FEE 12/4- 12/13/01 16J2PAGE 116 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 70.00 0.00 70.00 76.70 0.00 76.70 85.00 0.00 85.00 183.78 0.00 183.78 55.00 0.00 55.00 85.00 0.00 85.00 29.40 0.00 29.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 946.89 1,479.20 0.00 1.479.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,479.20 25.20 0.00 25.20 54.00 0.00 54.00 36.00 0.00 36.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 115.20 700.00 0.00 700.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 700.00 6J2AGE 117 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 569330 VENDOR 900080 - RICHARD C.CONLEY 301175 AMB.REF R.CONLEY 7/13/00 490 - 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 20.66 0.00 AMB.REF R.CONLEY #0024598 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569282 VENDOR 900030 - RICHARD ZYVOLOSKI 301128 10/30.1/19 TRVL R ZYVOLSK 118 - 144210.640200.33781 0.00 100.63 0.00 10/30 -1/19 TRVL R ZYVOLOSKI CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569047 VENDOR 255920 ROBERT CASEY 20012056 1/6 -7 TRVL R CASEY 408 - 233313 - 640300 -00000 0.00 24.00 0.00 1/6 -7 TRVL R CASEY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569076 VENDOR 266940 ROCHESTER MIDLAND CREATIVE CHEM 20012136 010580351 001 - 122220 - 652990 -00000 0.00 475.02 0.00 200075 SANITIZE & DEORDERIZE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569072 VENDOR 265210 - ROCKHURST COLLEGE CONTINUING 20012063 400254135 -001 S DARROW 111.156390- 654360.00000 0.00 249.00 0.00 150133 REGIST S DARROW 1/29/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569228 VENDOR 344370 . RUSH MESSENGER SERVICE WEST, INC 20012135 17659 111 - 156310- 634999 -00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 201212 COURIER 20012135 17928 111 - 156310 - 634999.00000 0.00 18.00 0.00 201212 COURIER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569331 VENDOR 900080 - RUTH BASCHE 301138 AMB.REF R.RASCHE 4/20/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 59.81 0.00 AMB.REF R.RASCHE #0120262 -1 rl 6J2AGE 118 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568913 VENDOR 159900 - SAFECO INC. 20012143 5740759 408. 253221- 652990 -00000 0.00 16.40 0.00 200427 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 20012143 5739105 408 - 253221. 652990 -00000 0.00 12.00 0.00 200427 SAFETY EQUIPMENT 20012143 5739915 408 - 253221. 652990 -00000 0.00 13.16 0.00 200427 SAFETY EQUIPMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569243 VENDOR 347470 SAFECO, INC. 20012123 5735621 490 - 144610 - 652930.00000 0.00 2,220.00 0.00 203171 SAFETY EQUIP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569294 VENDOR 900050 SAL RIVAS BAIL BONDS 301121 SAL RIVAS 99 -95 -79 MMA 001 - 431510. 351100.00000 0.00 3,600.00 0.00 SAL RIVAS 99 -95 -79 MMA C FULLER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568957 VENDOR 184630 - SAM GALLOWAY FORD 20012130 539836 521 - 122410. 646425.00000 0.00 45.37 0.00 200926 PARTS 20012131 540591 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 37.19 0.00 200926 PARTS 20012131 541376 521 - 122410- 646425.00000 0.00 25.17 0.00 200926 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568911 VENDOR 159590 SAM "S CLUB #6364 NAPLES 20012132 44366342988 01/03 111 - 156343. 652210 -00000 0.00 479.53 0.00 202102 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568945 VENDOR 174790 SATCO JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012170 232490 200428 ACID 20012170 232484 200428 ACID 20012170 232573 200428 ACID 20012170 232516 200428 ACID 20012170 232488 200428 ACID 20012170 232560 200428 ACID 20012170 232487 200428 ACID COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408 - 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 408- 253221. 652310 -00000 0.00 408 - 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 408- 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 408 - 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 408 - 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 408 - 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 16J2PAGE 119 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1.103.78 0.00 1,107.78 0.00 1,107.78 0.00 1.105.12 0.00 1.107.78 0.00 1.103.34 0.00 1,103.34 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569295 VENDOR 900050 SATRUNIA LABES /GL HOMES OF NAPLES 301133 SATRUNIA LABES 309294 113 - 000000- 115420.00000 0.00 162.30 0.00 SATURNIA LABES 309294 GL HOMES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569296 VENDOR 900050 SATURNIA LABES /GL HOMES OF NAPLES 301122 SATURNIA LABES 309302 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 40.80 0.00 SATURNIA LABES GL HOMES 309302 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569157 VENDOR 316590 - SBC DATACOMM 20012137 375- 037253 001. 121154 - 651950.00000 0.00 4.639.60 0.00 203216 SERVICED SUP 20012025 375. 036667 001. 121143- 651950 -00000 0.00 476.00 001 - 121143- 641950.00000 0.00 20.98 0.00 152210 DATA PROC.EQUIPM. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568860 VENDOR 114340 - SBCCI JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 120 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012033 02 -00150 E.PERICO 113. 138930- 654210 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 153261 MMB /SHIP E.PERICO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 CHECK NO 569104 VENDOR 284480 SCHONSTEDT INSTRUMENT COMPANY 20012140 17434 408. 253212 - 652910 -00000 0.00 1,107.32 0.00 1,107.32 203562 METAL LOCATOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,107.32 CHECK NO 568968 VENDOR 193330 SCOTT PAINT CORP. 20012144 9053050 408. 253211 - 652990 -00000 0.00 417.32 0.00 417.32 201824 PAINT SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 417.32 CHECK NO 568994 VENDOR 211140 - SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY 20012173 0221876/2000865131 191 - 138785 - 884100 -33751 0.00 668.99 0.00 668.99 203995 FISCHER #24805000281 20012173 0221877/2000865131 191 - 138785 - 884100 -33751 0.00 419.99 0.00 419.99 203995 FISCHER #24805000281 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,088.98 CHECK NO 569121 VENDOR 294240 - SELVIDGE TECHNOLOGY, INC 20012024 8570 408 - 233312 - 646970 -00000 0.00 281.90 0.00 281.90 152145 R & M CHECK TOTAL 0.00 281.90 CHECK NO 569112 VENDOR 288890 - SEVERN TRENT ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 20012053 JAN 02 PEL BAY SVC 109. 182601 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,320.00 109 - 182900. 634999 -00000 0.00 1,360.00 778 - 182700 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,320.00 0.00 4,000.00 JAN 02 200017 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,000.00 CHECK NO 569332 VENDOR 900080 - SHARON OTT 301185 AMB.REF S.OTT 4/20/01 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 335.00 0.00 335.00 AMB.REF ROBERT OTT #0120225 -1 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2PAGE 121 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 335.00 CHECK NO 568820 VENDOR 16910 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 20012185 0195 4 001 - 122240 - 652999 -00000 0.00 14.94 0.00 14.94 201267 PAINT SUPPLIES 20012185 0128 5 001 - 122240 - 652999 -00000 0.00 39.53 0.00 39.53 201267 PAINT SUPPLIES 20012185 9582 4 001. 122240- 652999 -00000 0.00 17.84 0.00 17.84 201267 PAINT SUPPLIES 20012185 5660 4 001- 122240. 652999 -00000 0.00 207.96 0.00 207.96 201267 PAINT SUPPLIES 20012185 5661 2 001 - 122240 - 652999.00000 0.00 70.27 0.00 70.27 201267 PAINT SUPPLIES 20012185 6525 8 001 - 122240. 652999 -00000 0.00 42.12 0.00 42.12 201267 PAINT SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 392.66 CHECK NO 569063 VENDOR 260670 SHIPP MATES 20012028 2797 408 - 210155 - 652110 -00000 0.00 329.00 0.00 329.00 151911 POLO SHIRTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 329.00 CHECK NO 568859 VENDOR 114210 SMALL ENGINE WORLD 20012128 413324 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 43.35 0.00 43.35 200701 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 43.35 CHECK NO 568971 VENDOR 193860 SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE MGMT 20012031 2001016782 D.JANSON 408. 210105 - 654210 -00000 0.00 160.00 0.00 160.00 152108 ANNUAL MMB /SHIP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 160.00 CHECK NO 569146 VENDOR 313450 - SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 20012027 3826D 198 - 157440- 652990 -00000 0.00 749.93 0.00 749.93 152784 SUPPL. 6J2PAGE 122 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA I REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012029 3631D 408- 253212 - 649010 -00000 0.00 396.43 0.00 152104 LIC.& PERMIT 20012122 32A20 473. 173413 - 652990 -00000 0.00 1,420.00 0.00 202978 COMPUTER SUPPORT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569015 VENDOR 231730 SOURCE COMPUTING, INC. 20012129 2001066 408. 210111- 634999 -00000 0.00 812.50 0.00 202485 CREATE FILES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569100 VENDOR 282370 SOUTHWEST ELECTRIC, INC. 20012139 462 001. 122240 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1.250.00 0.00 203673 INSTALL HEAD LIGHTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569138 VENDOR 305680 SOUTHWEST FL PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHT 20012381 PP #9 001.000000.218700 -00000 0.00 2,055.70 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568976 VENDOR 195660 SPECTRUM PAINTING & RESTORATION 20012138 232 001.122240- 639961.00000 0.00 1,322.46 0.00 201266 PAINT /LABOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568821 VENDOR 17410 SPEEDY BLUEPRINTING 20012261 10197978 301 - 210140- 651950 -01014 0.00 300.00 301 - 210140 - 764900.01014 0.00 9,197.00 0.00 203412 PLOTTER 20012262 10197977 301.210140- 764900 -01014 0.00 9,187.00 301 - 210140 - 651950 -01014 0.00 300.00 0.00 203451 PLOTTER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569034 VENDOR 250020 - SPRINT CHECK NO 569045 VENDOR 255040 - SPRINT 20012161 657 9003 434 12/28 01127 495. 192330- 641900 -00000 0.00 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 222.73 16J2AGE 123 REPORT 100 -601 434 12/28 01/27 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 20012157 092 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 681 - 421510. 641900 -00000 0.00 173.75 0.00 173.75 FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 1528 163 12/16 01/15 201322 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012048 424053565 12/28 490 - 144610 - 641900.00000 0.00 10.88 0.00 10.88 424053565 12/28 12122 -1121 20012048 362935190 1/08/02 109 - 182601 - 641400 -00000 0.00 28.57 001 - 156140 - 641900 -00000 0.00 167.00 0.00 109. 182900- 641400 -00000 0.00 28.57 1441 953 1 /10 2/9 778 - 182700 - 641400 -00000 0.00 9.51 0.00 66.65 362935190 1/08/02 111 - 156313. 641900 -00000 0.00 254.15 0.00 254.15 353 3636 726 12/25 01/24 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 77.53 CHECK NO 569045 VENDOR 255040 - SPRINT 20012161 657 9003 434 12/28 01127 495. 192330- 641900 -00000 0.00 222.73 0.00 222.73 657 9003 434 12/28 01/27 20012157 092 1528 163 12/16 01/15 681 - 421510. 641900 -00000 0.00 173.75 0.00 173.75 092 1528 163 12/16 01/15 201322 20012074 732 3168 12122 -1121 001 - 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 43.27 0.00 43.27 732 3168 12122 -1121 20012049 455 1441 953 1 /10 2/9 001 - 156140 - 641900 -00000 0.00 167.00 0.00 167.00 455 1441 953 1 /10 2/9 20012049 353 3636 726 12/25 01/24 111 - 156313. 641900 -00000 0.00 254.15 0.00 254.15 353 3636 726 12/25 01/24 20012050 394 2383 111 1/7 2/6 001 - 156160 - 641210.00000 0.00 33.22 0.00 33.22 394 2383 111 1/7 2/6 20012050 597 3653 597 1/7 2/6 001 - 156170 - 641210 -00000 0.00 37.08 0.00 37.08 597 3653 597 1/7 2/6 20012074 774 7686 12/19 -1/18 001 - 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 22.80 0.00 22.80 774 7686 12/19 -1/18 20016165 092 1460 172 12/16 01/15 495 - 192370 - 641900 -00000 0.00 190.90 0.00 190.90 092 1460 172 12/16 01/15 200151 20012050 657 1446 244 12/28 01127 111 - 156334. 641900 -00000 0.00 78.75 111 - 156349. 641900 -00000 0.00 196.88 0.00 275.63 657 1446 244 12/28 01/27 20012166 394 3355 969 1/7 2/6 495 - 192370 - 641900.00000 0.00 358.02 0.00 358.02 394 3355 969 1/7 2/6 200151 20012050 657 2655 649 12/28 01/27 101 - 163620 - 641900 -00000 0.00 196.75 0.00 196.75 657 2655 649 12/28 01127 20012074 657 3232 12/28.1/27 001 - 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 28.46 0.00 28.46 657 3232 12/28 -1/27 JANUARY 30, 2002 VCHR DISC COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 66.33 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 73.36 0.00 583.87 0.00 24.13 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 20012049 352 1991 791 1/13 2/12 111. 156395. 641900.00000 0.00 111 - 156332 - 641900 -00000 0.00 352 1991 791 1/13 2112 20012049 793 7465 894 1/13 2112 111 - 156341 - 641900.00000 0.00 793 7465 894 1/13 2112 20012050 597 1737 074 1/7 2/6 001 - 156170 - 641900 -00000 0.00 597 1737 074 1/7 2/6 20012050 642 6652 151 1/4 2/3 521. 122450 - 641400 -00000 0.00 642 6652 151 1/4 2/3 20012050 597 6707 284 1/7 2/6 109 - 182601 - 641150 -00000 0.00 109 - 182900 - 641150 -00000 0.00 778 - 182700 - 641150.00000 0.00 597 6707 284 1/7 2/6 20012157 775 5538 558 12122 01/21 681 - 421510 - 641900.00000 0.00 775 5538 558 12122 01/21 201322 20012159 657 8336 098 12/28 01/27 681 - 431310 - 641900 -00000 0.00 657 8336 098 12/28 01127 201335 20012074 774 8049 12/19.1/18 001. 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 774 8049 12/19 -1/18 20012166 642 7878 930 1/4 2/3 495 - 192370 - 641900 -00000 0.00 642 7878 930 114 2/3 200151 20012050 597 5355 941 1/7 2/6 408 - 233312. 641100 -00000 0.00 597 5355 941 1/7 2/6 20012074 774 9356 12/19.1/18 001. 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 774 9356 12/19 -1/18 20012161 657 9795 548 12/28 01/27 495 - 192330. 641900 -00000 0.00 657 9795 548 12/28 01/27 202060 20012050 498 4726 837 1/4 2/3 001 - 156363 - 641900 -00000 0.00 498 4726 837 1/4 2/3 20012049 695 4450 232 1/4 2/3 146. 144380 - 641900 -00000 0.00 695 4450 232 1/4 2/3 20012050 642 0818 064 1/4 2/3 001 - 156363 - 641900 -00000 0.00 642 0818 064 1/4 2/3 20012050 498 5799 216 1/4 2/3 001 - 156363. 641900 -00000 0.00 498 5799 216 1/4 2/3 16J2PAGE 124 AMT NET VCHR DISC 33.00 66.33 0.00 73.36 0.00 583.87 0.00 24.13 0.00 14.38 14.38 4.79 33.74 178.93 1.633.02 367.28 249.69 33.58 56.06 33.99 43.88 57.05 37.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 99.33 73.36 583.87 24.13 33.55 33.74 178.93 1.633.02 367.28 249.69 33.58 56.06 33.99 43.88 57.05 37.58 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2PAGE 125 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012074 774 9106 12/19 -1/18 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 33.58 0.00 33.58 774 9106 12/19 -1/18 20012049 793 2234 808 1/13 2/12 198 - 157410 - 641900 -00000 0.00 100.69 0.00 100.69 793 2234 808 1/13 2112 20012074 334 6249 12/4 -1/3 001 - 000000. 202800 -00000 0.00 877.45 0.00 877.45 334 6249 12/4 -1/3 20012050 101 2152 615 1/1 1/31 001 - 155410 - 641900.00000 0.00 215.00 0.00 215.00 101 2152 615 1/1 1/31 20012074 101 2081 12/1 -31 001- 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 298.25 0.00 298.25 101 2081 12/1 -31 20012049 352 1995 446 1/13 2112 111 - 156332 - 641900.00000 0.00 62.22 0.00 62.22 352 1995 446 1/13 2112 20012050 353 4244 543 12/25 01/24 001 - 157110 - 641900 -00000 0.00 573.66 0.00 573.66 353 4244 543 12/25 01/24 20012049 695 4114 945 1/4 2/3 146 - 144380 - 641900.00000 0.00 63.87 0.00 63.87 695 4114 945 1/4 2/3 20012074 774 9207 12/19.1/18 001 - 000000 - 202800.00000 0.00 45.24 0.00 45.24 774 9207 12/19 -1/18 20012157 179 9178 165 1/4 2/3 681. 421510- 641900 -00000 0.00 3.05 0.00 3.05 179 9178 165 1/4 2/3 201322 20012074 658 7300 12/13 -1/12 001. 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 510.39 0.00 510.39 658 7300 12/13 -1/12 20012074 530 5300 12/16 -1/15 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 1,757.03 0.00 1,757.03 530 5300 12/16.1/15 20012050 643 6870 870 12/16 01/15 001 - 155810 - 641900 -00000 0.00 28.85 0.00 28.85 643 6870 870 12/16 01/15 20012049 695 3473 779 1/4 2/3 146 - 144380 - 641900 -00000 0.00 53.00 0.00 53.00 695 3473 779 1/4 2/3 20012050 597 1749 015 01/7 02/6 109 - 182601- 641400 -00000 0.00 73.72 109 - 182900- 641400 -00000 0.00 73.72 778 - 182700 - 641400 -00000 0.00 24.55 0.00 171.99 597 1749 015 01/7 02/6 20012050 101 1549 760 1/1 1/31 408. 253212 - 641100 -00000 0.00 140.00 0.00 140.00 101 1549 760 1/1 1/31 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 126 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012050 597 8078 038 1/7 2/6 408. 233313- 641100.00000 0.00 30.09 0.00 30.09 597 8078 038 1/7 2/6 20012050 394 3272 147 1/7 2/6 001- 156160 - 641900.00000 0.00 85.56 0.00 85.56 394 3272 147 1/7 2/6 20012074 658 0781 12/13 -1/12 001. 000000- 202800 -00000 0.00 31.62 0.00 31.62 658 0781 12/13 -1/12 20016165 092 4237 364 12/16 01/15 495 - 192370 - 641900.00000 0.00 215.00 0.00 215.00 092 4237 364 12/16 01/15 200151 20012074 643 8400 12/16 -1/15 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 2,284.55 0.00 2.284.55 643 8400 12/16 -1/15 20012049 455 2612 627 1 /10 2/9 001 - 156140. 641210 -00000 0.00 27.77 0.00 27.77 455 2612 627 1 /10 2/9 20012050 657 2525 608 12/28 01/27 113 - 138722 - 641900 -00000 0.00 254.00 0.00 254.00 657 2525 608 12/28 01/27 20012050 394 2793 738 1/7 2/6 001- 156363 - 641900 -00000 0.00 27.55 0.00 27.55 394 2793 738 1/7 2/6 20012074 732 2700 12122 -1121 001 - 000000 - 202800.00000 0.00 758.29 0.00 758.29 732 2700 12122.1121 20012074 775 6687 12122 -1121 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 33.58 0.00 33.58 775 6687 12122 -1121 20012049 455 8088 880 1 /10 2/9 001 - 156145 - 641900.00000 0.00 211.44 0.00 211.44 455 8088 880 1 /10 2/9 20012074 643 6575 12/16 -1/15 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 1,482.46 0.00 1,482.46 643 6575 12/16 -1/15 20012050 455 2275 227 1 /10 2/9 408. 253221 - 641100 -00000 0.00 67.16 0.00 67.16 455 2275 227 1 /10 2/9 20012049 658 0092 432 1/13 2112 198 - 157440 - 641900.00000 0.00 219.06 0.00 219.06 658 0092 432 1/13 2112 20012050 394 7776 689 1/7 2/6 001 - 156160- 641900 -00000 0.00 34.61 0.00 34.61 394 7776 689 1/7 2/6 20012050 597 2265 030 1/7 2/6 109 - 182601- 641400 -00000 0.00 46.96 109- 182900- 641400 -00000 0.00 46.96 778. 182700 - 641400 -00000 0.00 15.65 0.00 109.57 597 2265 030 1/7 2/6 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2PAGE 127 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012074 657 1035 12/28 -1/27 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 48.97 0.00 48.97 657 1035 12/28 -1/27 20012050 597 8444 092 1/7 2/6 001 - 156170 - 641900 -00000 0.00 106.48 0.00 106.48 597 8444 092 1/7 2/6 20012049 455 2343 947 1 /10 2/9 130 - 157710 - 641900.00000 0.00 278.92 0.00 278.92 455 2343 947 1 /10 2/9 20012050 394 8770 089 12/07 -01/06 144 - 144360 - 641900 -00000 0.00 130.52 0.00 130.52 394 8770 089 12/07 -01/06 20012050 695 2226 723 1/4 2/3 521 - 122450. 641400 -00000 0.00 22.89 0.00 22.89 695 2226 723 1/4 2/3 20012049 695 2902 083 1/4 2/3 146 - 144380 - 641900.00000 0.00 59.74 0.00 59.74 695 2902 083 1/4 2/3 20012074 101 1919 12/1 -31 001 - 000000- 202800.00000 0.00 284.40 0.00 284.40 101 1919 12/1 -31 20012157 774 3618 217 12/19 01/18 681 - 421510. 641900.00000 0.00 28.84 0.00 28.84 774 3618 217 12/19 01/18 201322 20012049 793 4414 098 1/13 2/12 111 - 156381 - 641900.00000 0.00 190.15 0.00 190.15 793 4414 098 1/13 2112 20012049 455 9282 744 1 /10 2/9 001- 156363. 641900 -00000 0.00 89.31 0.00 89.31 455 9282 744 1 /10 2/9 20012158 774 4803 218 12/19 01/18 681 - 410710 - 641900.00000 0.00 28.02 0.00 28.02 774 4803 218 12/19 01 /18 201340 20012160 695 2778 742 1/4 2/3 495 - 192350 - 641900.00000 0.00 318.50 0.00 318.50 695 2778 742 1/4 2/3 201774 20012074 774 8999 12/19 -1/18 001 - 000000 - 202800 -00000 0.00 5,227.57 0.00 5,227.57 774 8999 12/19 -1/18 20012049 597 1737 063 1/7 2/6 109 - 182601 - 641400 -00000 0.00 56.62 109. 182900- 641400 -00000 0.00 56.62 778. 182700- 641400 -00000 0.00 18.86 0.00 132.10 597 1737 063 1/7 2/6 20012157 657 6608 321 12/28 0/127 681 - 421510 - 641900.00000 0.00 77.84 0.00 77.84 657 6608 321 12/28 01/27 201322 20012050 774 5653 109 12/19 0/18 001- 155810 - 641900 -00000 0.00 34.86 0.00 34.86 774 5653 109 12/19 01/18 JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012050 394 6750 137 1/7 2/6 394 6750 137 1/7 2/6 20012050 348 2784 799 1/7 2/6 348 2784 799 1/7 2/6 20012050 513 9264 452 1/4 2/3 513 9264 452 1/4 2/3 20012050 394 6835 293 01/7 2/6 394 6835 1/7 2/6 20012050 657 5501 211 12/28 01/27 657 5501 211 12/28 01/27 20012049 695 4331 144 1/4 2/3 695 4331 144 1/4 2/3 20012074 657 8228 12/28 -1/27 657 8228 12/28 -1/27 20012157 093 2800 130 12/16 01/15 093 2800 130 12/16 01/15 201322 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS VCHR DISC SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 441 - 256110. 641100 -00000 0.00 408 - 253211 - 641100.00000 0.00 001 - 156363 - 641900.00000 0.00 521 - 122450 - 641400 -00000 0.00 113 - 138722 - 641900 -00000 0.00 470- 173443- 641900 -00000 0.00 001. 000000. 202800 -00000 0.00 681 - 421510 - 641900.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569211 VENDOR 338370 - SPRINT YELLOW PAGES 20012163 300184358 470 - 173463 - 648160 -00000 202830 DIRECTORY 20012156 300164257 1/07 495 - 192370 - 641900 -00000 200257 DIRECTORY CHECK NO 568992 VENDOR 209310 - SPRINT /UNITED TELEPHONE - FLORIDA 20012162 C010204066 1102 001 - 156110 - 646710 -00000 C010204066 1102 202363 CHECK NO 568819 VENDOR 16420 - ST FRANCIS ANIMAL CLINIC 20012169 L WHITE O1 8938 610. 155410 - 631970 -00000 L WHITE O1 8938 201067 20012169 J HOFFMAN O1 9154 610 - 155410. 631970 -00000 J HOFFMAN O1 9154 201067 16J2PAGE 128 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 32.45 0.00 32.45 27.77 0.00 27.77 65.96 0.00 65.96 30.45 0.00 30.45 111.09 0.00 111.09 45.82 0.00 45.82 70.10 0.00 70.10 815.25 0.00 815.25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 24,607.38 0.00 44.00 0.00 44.00 0.00 43.00 0.00 43.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 87.00 0.00 155.65 0.00 155.65 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 155.65 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 6J2AGE 129 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012169 J STRACK O1 9209 610 - 155410.631970 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 J STRACK O1 9209 201067 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568866 VENDOR 120640 - ST. FRANCIS II ANIMAL CLINIC 20012168 S BRADBURY O1 9223 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 S BRADBURY O1 9223 201073 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568840 VENDOR 102890 • STANDARD & POOR'S CORPORATION 20012127 5461923 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 1,143.40 0.00 203919 PRICE RECORD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569004 VENDOR 220620 - STANDARD CHANGE MAKERS 20012141 194551 001 - 156363.646970 -00000 0.00 38.76 0.00 201835 REPAIR & MAINTANCE 20012141 195059 001 - 156363 - 646970.00000 0.00 1,380.13 0.00 201835 REPAIR & MAINTANCE 20012141 194550 001 - 156363 - 646970 -00000 0.00 685.00 0.00 201835 REPAIR & MAINTANCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569275 VENDOR 350750 - STATE OF FL DEPT OF HEALTH 20012400 APP FOR CERT TEST LABS 408 - 233350.654210 -00000 0.00 200.00 0.00 153371 APP FOR CERT TEST LABS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569131 VENDOR 301540 STATE OF FLORIDA DISBURSMENT UNIT 20012371 PP #9 001 - 000000 - 218810.00000 0.00 4,705.01 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568898 VENDOR 149220 STEELE TRUCK CENTER 20012145 56623 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 64.93 0.00 200933 PARTS JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 130 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012146 56476 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 76.15 0.00 76.15 200933 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 141.08 CHECK NO 568825 VENDOR 17800 SUMMIT HOME RESP. SVC, INC 20012167 W JOHNSON 1/01/02 001. 155930 - 652810 -00000 0.00 268.75 0.00 268.75 201930 W JOHNSON 1 /01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 268.75 CHECK NO 568886 VENDOR 136600 SUN BELT MEDICAL /EMERGI- SOURCE 20012126 93723 490 - 144610 - 652710.00000 0.00 1,730.60 0.00 1,730.60 203587 GATE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,730.60 CHECK NO 569079 VENDOR 268950 SUN COAST MEDIA GROUP, INC. 20012032 2001577 118 - 144210 - 647110 -33781 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 151371 COLORING BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.000.00 CHECK NO 568746 VENDOR 262150 SUN LIFE OF CANADA 20011348 1102 ADMIN FEES ST /LT 519 - 121670. 645170 -00000 0.00 3,121.43 0.00 3.121.43 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,121.43 CHECK NO 568837 VENDOR 101420 SUNCOAST SCHOOLS 20012361 PP #9 001 - 000000 - 218300 -00000 0.00 129,009.94 0.00 129.009.94 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 129,009.94 CHECK NO 569101 VENDOR 282590 SUNLAND BOOKS, INC. 20012125 53057 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 2,520.24 0.00 2,520.24 203675 BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,520.24 CHECK NO 568823 VENDOR 17660 SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 20012152 386335 111 - 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 53.91 0.00 53.91 200984 SUPPLIES JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2PAGE 131 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012152 386300 111. 156332- 652990 -00000 0.00 25.54 0.00 25.54 200984 SUPPLIES 20012149 456932 408 - 233312 - 652910 -00000 0.00 13.48 0.00 13.48 200707 SUPPLIES 20012152 386335 111 - 156332. 652990 -00000 0.00 83.28 0.00 83.28 200984 SUPPLIES 20012149 456804 408 - 233312. 652910 -00000 0.00 66.12 0.00 66.12 200707 SUPPLIES 20012155 142425 109 - 182602 - 652990 -00000 0.00 42.07 0.00 42.07 200086 HARDWARE SUPPLIES 20012152 386349 111 - 156332. 652990 -00000 0.00 60.16 0.00 60.16 200984 SUPPLIES 20012149 456910 408 - 233312. 652910 -00000 0.00 115.24 0.00 115.24 200707 SUPPLIES 20012152 386308 111. 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 53.99 0.00 53.99 200984 SUPPLIES 20012154 455642 001 - 156363. 652990 -00000 0.00 8.12 0.00 8.12 201443 SUPPLIES 20012152 386073 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 33.54 0.00 33.54 200984 SUPPLIES 20012149 4554050 408 - 233312 - 652910 -00000 0.00 43.65 0.00 43.65 200707 SUPPLIES 20012153 106337 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 22.45 0.00 22.45 201263 SUPPLIES 20012164 383855 101 - 163630 - 652990 -00000 0.00 115.81 0.00 115.81 200036 SUPPLIES 20012152 385972 111 - 156332 - 652990.00000 0.00 43.84 0.00 43.84 200984 SUPPLIES 20012149 454380 408 - 233312. 652910 -00000 0.00 29.60 0.00 29.60 200707 SUPPLIES 20012153 123545 001 - 122240. 652990 -00000 0.00 7.54 0.00 7.54 201263 SUPPLIES 20012154 4555542 001 - 156363 - 652990.00000 0.00 2.23 0.00 2.23 201443 SUPPLIES CHECK NO 569050 VENDOR 257140 - SUNSHINE STATE ONE OF FL.INC JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 132 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012164 386016 101 - 163630- 652990 -00000 0.00 119.75 0.00 119.75 200036 SUPPLIES 20012154 386015 001 - 156363 - 652990.00000 0.00 2.23 0.00 2.23 201443 SUPPLIES 20012153 124257 001- 122240. 652990 -00000 0.00 3.32 0.00 3.32 201263 SUPPLIES 20012149 455597 408. 233312- 652910 -00000 0.00 88.13 0.00 88.13 200707 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.034.00 CHECK NO 568824 VENDOR 17670 SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 20012151 455990 408 - 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 27.94 0.00 27.94 200750 SUPPLIES 20012150 386346 408 - 210130 - 652990.00000 0.00 125.99 0.00 125.99 200748 SUPPLIES 20012151 456146 408 - 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 120.01 0.00 120.01 200750 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 273.94 CHECK NO 568984 VENDOR 200380 SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 20012148 386149 408 - 253221. 652990 -00000 0.00 32.31 0.00 32.31 200430 SUPPLIES 20012147 386318 408- 253211. 652990 -00000 0.00 8.92 0.00 8.92 200398 SUPPLIES 20012148 386468 408- 253221 - 652990.00000 0.00 26.99 0.00 26.99 200430 SUPPLIES 20012148 386463 408 - 253221 - 652990 -00000 0.00 22.22 0.00 22.22 200430 SUPPLIES 20012147 386535 408 - 253211 - 652990 -00000 0.00 131.24 0.00 131.24 200398 SUPPLIES 20012147 386503 408 - 253211 - 652990.00000 0.00 6.44 0.00 6.44 200398 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 228.12 CHECK NO 569050 VENDOR 257140 - SUNSHINE STATE ONE OF FL.INC JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012124 201020178 200738 UTILITY LOCATES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408 - 210130 - 634999 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 568905 VENDOR 156260 - SURETY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 20012258 11228 -01 001- 122240. 646110 -00000 0.00 203032 FIRE WALL JAIL LABOR 0.00 20012121 11213 -01 301 - 120435 - 763100 -80525 20012273 203537 REPAIR BATH SPORTS PARK 0.00 20012259 011219 -04 001. 122240 - 646110 -00000 LOGO'S DISCOUNT 202967 170 WALL BUILDING 20012273 20012260 011231 12 301 - 120435. 763100 -80525 202055 001 - 122240. 646110 -00000 20012026 001 - 122240 - 762200 -00000 202681 REMODEL BUDGET OFFICE 20012263 011231 10 301. 120435 - 763100.80525 107487 COUNTY ATTORNY OFFICE 20012264 11228 02 301 - 120435 - 763100 -80525 203050 EMS INSULATE 2 WALLS CHECK NO 569222 VENDOR 342740 - SY'S SUPPLIES WEST INC. 20012142 75907 101- 163630- 653710 -00000 200037 TRAFFIC STATION CHECK NO 568832 VENDOR 18690 - T -SHIRT EXPRESS 20012273 28513 0.00 111 - 156341 - 652110 -00000 0.00 202055 LOGO'S DISCOUNT 3,680.00 20012273 28586 0.00 111- 156341 - 652110 -00000 202055 LOGO'S DISCOUNT 20012273 28583 111 - 156341 - 652110 -00000 202055 LOGO'S DISCOUNT 20012026 28466 111 - 156341 - 652110.00000 152554 T- SHIRTS 16J2AGE 133 AMT NET VCHR DISC 1.432.76 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 5,631.00 0.00 1,763.43 0.00 10,208.00 0.00 3,680.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3,680.00 0.00 24,995.00 0.00 7,826.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 169.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 1.432.76 1,432.76 5,631.00 1,763.43 10,208.00 7,360.00 24,995.00 7,826.00 57,783.43 169.50 169.50 0.00 4.49- 0.00 4.49- 0.00 2.25- 0.00 2.25- 0.00 206.50 0.00 206.50 0.00 263.15 0.00 263.15 JANUARY 30, 2002 VENDOR 18020 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 90336 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 6.74- 203103 PARTS 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 149.70 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 149.30 203103 FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER 32955 DESCRIPTION 522 - 122464 - 764110 -00000 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 20012273 28583 111 - 156341 - 652110 -00000 0.00 202055 LOGO'S DISCOUNT 20012281 28672 111 - 156390 - 652110 -00000 0.00 202048 LOGOS 20012273 28586 111. 156341- 652110.00000 0.00 202055 LOGO'S DISCOUNT 20012273 28576 111. 156341- 652110 -00000 0.00 202055 LOGO'S DISCOUNT 20012273 28582 111 - 156341 - 652110 -00000 0.00 202055 LOGO'S DISCOUNT 20012273 28582 111 - 156341 - 652110 -00000 0.00 202055 LOGO'S DISCOUNT 20012273 28584 111 - 156341 - 652110.00000 0.00 202055 LOGO'S DISCOUNT 20012273 28585 111. 156341. 652110 -00000 0.00 202055 LOGO'S DISCOUNT 20012273 26576 111 - 156341 - 652110.00000 0.00 202055 LOGO'S DISCOUNT 20012273 28513 111. 156341- 652110 -00000 0.00 202055 LOGO'S DISCOUNT 20012273 28584 111 - 156341. 652110 -00000 0.00 202055 LOGO'S DISCOUNT 20012273 28576 111 - 156341 - 652110 -00000 0.00 202055 LOGO'S DISCOUNT 20012273 28585 111 - 156341 - 652110 -00000 0.00 202055 LOGO'S DISCOUNT CHECK NO 568829 VENDOR 18020 - TAMIAMI FORD INC 20012403 90336 4.49- 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 6.74- 203103 PARTS 0.00 20012402 CM90250 149.70 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 149.30 203103 PARTS 0.00 20012253 32955 149.60 522 - 122464 - 764110 -00000 4.49- 200661 F -150 0.00 16JIGE 134 AMT NET VCHR DISC 6.20- 0.00 138.00 0.00 74.90 0.00 4.49- 0.00 6.74- 0.00 224.70 0.00 7.56- 0.00 149.70 0.00 149.30 0.00 149.60 0.00 252.00 0.00 149.60 0.00 4.49- 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 140.67 0.00 140.67 0.00 58.24- 0.00 58.24- 0.00 21,342.34 0.00 21.342.34 JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012403 90305 203103 PARTS 20012246 32816 202263 TAURUS 20012253 33143 200661 F -150 20012249 32953 201225 ECON CUTAWA 20012403 CM90305 203103 PARTS 20012253 32891 200661 F -150 20012251 33146 200674 ECONOLINE 20012245 32951 202487 EXPLORER 20012402 90286 203103 PARTS 20012403 90353 203103 PARTS 20012254 32781 200416 RANGER 20012244 32952 200583 F -450 20012249 32954 201225 ECON CUTAWA 20012402 90418 203103 PARTS 20012402 90491 203103 PARTS 20012253 33140 200661 F -150 20012257 32894 200301 S -DTY -F 250 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 18.05 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 114 - 178975- 764110 -00000 0.00 522 - 122464 - 764110 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 764110 -00000 0.00 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 522 - 122464. 764110 -00000 0.00 522 - 122464. 764110 -00000 0.00 313. 163611 - 764110 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 111- 138911 - 764110 -00000 0.00 408. 253212- 764110 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240. 764110 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521. 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 522 - 122464 - 764110 -00000 0.00 101 - 163630. 764110.00000 0.00 16J2PAGE 135 AMT NET VCHR DISC 18.05 0.00 16,047.10 0.00 21,342.34 0.00 21,362.80 0.00 18.05- 0.00 21,342.34 0.00 17,250.00 0.00 20,887.38 0.00 95.84 0.00 8.89 0.00 18,224.56 0.00 29,625.61 0.00 21,362.80 0.00 233.90 0.00 13.11 0.00 21,342.34 0.00 22,204.15 0.00 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 136 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012403 90158 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 31.74 0.00 31.74 203103 PARTS 20012248 32786 408 - 233351 - 764110 -00000 0.00 18,224.56 0.00 18,224.56 201499 RANGER 20012403 90250 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 58.24 0.00 58.24 203103 PARTS 20012254 32782 111 - 138911 - 764110 -00000 0.00 18,224.56 0.00 18,224.56 200416 RANGER 20012402 90501 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 90.88 0.00 90.88 203103 PARTS 20012253 33141 522 - 122464 - 764110 -00000 0.00 21,342.34 0.00 21,342.34 200661 F -150 20012244 33139 408 - 253212. 764110 -00000 0.00 29,625.61 0.00 29,625.61 200583 F -450 20012250 33147 522 - 122464 - 764110 -00000 0.00 18.995.40 0.00 18,995.40 200676 ECONOLINE 20012247 32817 470. 173435- 764110 -00000 0.00 22,904.68 0.00 22,904.68 201910 EXPLORER 20012403 90220 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 79.49 0.00 79.49 203103 PARTS 20012402 90503 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 64.78 0.00 64.78 203103 PARTS 20012253 33142 522 - 122464 - 764110 -00000 0.00 21,342.34 0.00 21,342.34 200661 F -150 20012256 32780 101 - 163630. 764110.00000 0.00 18,224.56 0.00 18,224.56 200302 RANGER 20012255 33144 408. 210151 - 764110 -00000 0.00 26,410.61 0.00 26,410.61 200330 S -DTY -F -350 20012252 33145 522 - 122464. 764110 -00000 0.00 19,607.00 0.00 19,607.00 200672 ECONOLINE 20012403 90275 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 111.10 0.00 111.10 203103 PARTS 20012247 32892 470 - 173435 - 764110.00000 0.00 22,904.68 0.00 22,904.68 201910 EXPLORER JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 137 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 491.010.50 CHECK NO 569026 VENDOR 238410 - TANNER INDUSTRIES 20012279 83952 408 - 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 704.06 0.00 704.06 202573 AMMONIA 20012279 83650 408 - 253221. 652310 -00000 0.00 872.61 0.00 872.61 202573 AMMONIA 20012280 83649 408. 253211 - 652310 -00000 0.00 930.75 0.00 930.75 202572 AMMONIA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,507.42 CHECK NO 568830 VENDOR 18040 - TAYLOR RENTAL 20012278 1 212667 08 472 - 173430. 644600.33821 0.00 504.80 0.00 504.80 202818 RENTAL EQUIPTMENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 504.80 CHECK NO 569297 VENDOR 900050 TAYLOR WOODROW COMMUNITIES 301123 T WOODROW 309328 113 - 000000 - 115420 -00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 T WOODROW 309328 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5.00 CHECK NO 568983 VENDOR 199520 TECH OF COLLIER COUNTY 20012272 11 /01 SERVICE 111. 156332- 634999 -00000 0.00 1,872.00 0.00 1,872.00 201195 11 /01 SERVICE 20012272 12101 SERVICE 111. 156332- 634999 -00000 0.00 1,534.00 0.00 1,534.00 201195 12101 SERVICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,406.00 CHECK NO 569006 VENDOR 223930 THE HILLER GROUP, INC. 20012209 1009182 IN 495 - 192370. 642416.00000 0.00 7,809.60 0.00 7,809.60 200145 FUEL 12121 20012426 BAL DUE 1009137 IN 001 - 144510 - 652410.00000 0.00 444.92 0.00 444.92 200553 BAL DUE 1009137 20012209 1009293 IN 495 - 192370. 642416.00000 0.00 8,393.50 0.00 8,393.50 200145 FUEL 12/31 ri 6J2AGE 138 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012209 1009237 IN 495 - 192370 - 642416.00000 0.00 8,277.57 0.00 200145 FUEL 12/28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569130 VENDOR 300640 THE LAKE DOCTORS 20011612 315898 140 - 112550- 634999 -00000 0.00 3.950.00 0.00 200494 QTRLY TRTMT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568817 VENDOR 14880 THE PHOTO LAB 20011848 78775 001 - 100130 - 647210 -00000 0.00 11.65 0.00 153101 FILM DEV -1/8 20011848 78585 001 - 100130 - 647210 -00000 0.00 6.00 0.00 153101 FILM DEV -12/19 20011849 78722 490 - 144610 - 647210 -00000 0.00 9.50 0.00 153088 PRINTS F /MEDFLIGHT TRAINING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569107 VENDOR 286390 - THE PRINT SHOP 20012110 53379 001 - 000000 - 142900 -00000 0.00 340.96 0.00 200051 - PRINTING, 1/3 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569333 VENDOR 900080 - THELEME JOSEPH 301140 AMB.REF T.JOSEPH 9/27/01 490. 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 260.00 0.00 AMB.REF T.JOSEPH #0030649 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569270 VENDOR 350600 - THOMAS WIDES 20012431 1/15 TRVL T WIDES 408- 210105- 640200 -00000 0.00 27.60 0.00 1/15 TRVL T WIDES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569029 VENDOR 246080 - TKW CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC. 20012394 0005942 412 - 273511 - 631400 -70090 0.00 2,850.00 0.00 107168 12/1- 12/31/01 JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2PAGE 139 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 2,850.00 CHECK NO 569054 VENDOR 259320 - TOTAL SURGERY CENTER 20012270 E DILBS 11 /01 001 - 155930 - 634101.00000 0.00 3,037.07 0.00 3.037.07 203895 W SILVA 11 /01 20012271 L CONLEY 11120 001- 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 2.242.50 0.00 2,242.50 203718 L CONLEY 11120 20012271 L ANZUALDA 11/15 001. 155930- 634101 -00000 0.00 624.00 0.00 624.00 203718 L ANZUALDA 11/15 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5.903.57 CHECK NO 568935 VENDOR 169660 - TRAFFIC PARTS, INC. 20012269 155146 313. 163673- 763200 -60172 0.00 1,166.00 0.00 1,166.00 200038 TRAFFIC SIGNAL 20012269 155144 313 - 163673. 763200 -60172 0.00 1,288.00 0.00 1.288.00 200038 TRAFFIC SIGNAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,454.00 CHECK NO 569116 VENDOR 290610 - TRANE 20012401 3993158 301- 120402. 763100 -80172 0.00 35,932.28 0.00 35.932.28 201002 REPAIR JAIL 20012401 3920113 301. 120402 - 763100 -80172 0.00 429.53 0.00 429.53 201002 REPAIR JAIL 20012401 3993157 301 - 120402 - 763100 -80172 0.00 13.875.45 0.00 13,875.45 201002 REPAIR JAIL 20012401 3947135 301. 120402- 763100 -80172 0.00 14,033.40 0.00 14,033.40 201002 REPAIR JAIL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 64,270.66 CHECK NO 569225 VENDOR 343600 - TRUEGREEN LANDSCAPE 20012408 1851781769 001 - 126334 - 646314 -00000 0.00 6,250.00 0.00 6,250.00 203760 LAWN MAINT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,250.00 CHECK NO 569091 VENDOR 278670 - TRUGREEN 6J2AGE 140 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012276 748847 001 - 126334 - 646314 -00000 0.00 800.00 0.00 202013 FERTILIZATION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569233 VENDOR 345310 TRUGREEN LANDCARE 20012277 1851854062 001. 156363- 634999 -00000 0.00 832.84 0.00 201841 LANDSCAPE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569036 VENDOR 253060 TRUTWIN INDUSTRIES. INC. 20012275 27959 313. 163673 - 763100 -69122 0.00 414.64 0.00 203674 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568918 VENDOR 163320 TURBOMECA ENGINE CORPORATION 20012274 99799 001 - 144510 - 646860 -00000 0.00 337.89 0.00 203002 ENGINE PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568902 VENDOR 152910 - TURRELL & ASSOCIATES INC. 20012432 2 320 - 183805 - 631800 -00000 0.00 1,775.62 0.00 107775 SERVICES THRU 12/15/01 20012433 1 320 - 183800. 631400 -10268 0.00 14.835.50 0.00 107775 SERVICES TO 12/15/01 20012432 2 320 - 183800- 631400 -00000 0.00 6,657.50 0.00 107775 SERVICES THRU 12/15/01 20012433 1 320 - 183805- 631400 -00000 0.00 6,380.50 0.00 202142 SERVICES TO 12/15/01 20012432 2 320. 183805- 631400 -00000 0.00 11.965.00 0.00 107775 SERVICES THRU 12/15/01 20012433 1 320. 183800. 631400.00000 0.00 18,439.37 0.00 107775 SERVICES TO 12/15/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568948 VENDOR 178670 - U. S. ENERGY SERVICE JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012013 01124060 201252 INDOOR AIR QUAL. CHECK NO 569118 VENDOR 291300 - U.S. FILTER 20012419 8915327 203905 CHEM. 20012420 8914035 203905 CHEM. 20012420 8913899 203905 CHEM. 20012420 8915187 203905 CHEM. 20012420 8915229 203905 CHEM. 20012419 8915348 203905 CHEM. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 122240 - 646283 -00000 0.00 408 - 233351 - 652310.00000 0.00 408 - 233351 - 652310 -00000 0.00 408 - 233351 - 652310 -00000 0.00 408- 233351 - 652310 -00000 0.00 408 - 233351 - 652310 -00000 0.00 408 - 233351 - 652310.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569025 VENDOR 237380 - U.S. FILTER /DAVIS PROCESS DIVISION 20011752 8915328 408- 233352 - 652310 -00000 0.00 200743 CHEM. 20011752 8915356 408- 233352 - 652310 -00000 0.00 200743 CHEM. CHECK NO 568982 VENDOR 198790 - U.S. WATER NEWS 20011720 R145437 J.BOLDT 001 - 172910- 654210 -00000 0.00 152489 SUB.REN.J.BOLDT CHECK NO 568940 VENDOR 173930 - UNITED HORTICULTURAL SUPPLY 20011721 Z701729 109- 182901 - 652310 -00000 0.00 201668 PEST. CREDIT RETURN 20011721 5 -33026 109. 182901 - 652310.00000 0.00 201668 PEST.CREDIT OVER CH. 16J2AGE 141 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 3,558.11 0.00 3,558.11 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,558.11 4,042.50 0.00 4,042.50 6,435.00 0.00 6,435.00 2,722.50 0.00 2,722.50 231.00 0.00 231.00 4,496.25 0.00 4,496.25 4,372.50 0.00 4,372.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 22,299.75 2,062.50 0.00 2,062.50 1.980.00 0.00 1,980.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,042.50 54.00 0.00 54.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 54.00 453.00- 0.00 453.00- 7.76- 0.00 7.76- 6J2AGE 142 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20011721 0591121 109 - 182901 - 652310 -00000 0.00 2.428.76 0.00 201668 PEST.ROW CHEM. 20011722 CM528125 109 - 182901. 652310 -00000 0.00 29.40- 0.00 201668 CREDIT OVERCHARGE 20011722 0591339 109 - 182901- 652310 -00000 0.00 333.00 0.00 201668 ROW CHEM. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569099 VENDOR 282270 UNITED RENTAL 20011751 22033758 -002 111 - 156332. 644600 -00000 0.00 1.374.81 0.00 202959 RENT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568839 VENDOR 102380 UNITED WAY 20012380 PP #9 001- 000000 - 217100 -00000 0.00 564.51 0.00 PP #9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569164 VENDOR 318860 US BIOSYSTEMS, INC. 20011718 92551 12/26/01 408 - 233350 - 634999 -00000 0.00 90.00 0.00 200735 OIL &GREASE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569075 VENDOR 266770 USI INC 20011742 28841750101 111 - 156349 - 652990 -00000 0.00 47.32 0.00 151971 DESKTOP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568965 VENDOR 190630 VACCARO CONSULTING 20012418 12/1- 12/31/01 412 - 273511.763100.70882 0.00 4.500.00 0.00 107670 12/1- 12/31/01 PROF.FEE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569334 VENDOR 900080 - VERA ZURLO 301176 AMB.REF V.ZURLO 10 /10 /01 490 - 000000.116004 -00000 0.00 320.00 0.00 AMB.REF V.ZURLO #0200676 -1 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 16J2AGE 143 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 320.00 CHECK NO 568748 VENDOR 314680 - VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVICES 20011709 61Y941410070477108 DEC.01 001. 443010 - 641210 -00000 0.00 1.80 0.00 1.80 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.80 CHECK NO 568747 VENDOR 314680 - VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVICES 20009133 61Y941410070477108 NOV /01 001 - 443010. 641210 -00000 0.00 3.07 0.00 3.07 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3.07 CHECK NO 569154 VENDOR 314680 - VERIZON WIRELESS MESSAGING SERVICES 20011729 A2014611CA 1 /1. 1/31/02 113 - 138910 - 641150.00000 0.00 2.97 0.00 2.97 201837 1 /1- 1/31/02 BEEPERS 20009095 A2006266BL 12/1- 12/31/01 470 - 173410. 641150 -00000 0.00 8.54 0.00 8.54 201231 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20009673 A2005371BL 12/1- 12/31/01 408 - 210105 - 641150 -00000 0.00 39.02 0.00 39.02 201147 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SV 20011728 A2102038CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 001 - 454010 - 641150 -00000 0.00 5.95 0.00 5.95 202083 1 /1- 1/31/02 PAGING 20009673 A2005908BL 12/1- 12/31 -01 408- 253221 - 641150 -00000 0.00 17.10 0.00 17.10 201147 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SV 20009099 A2102051BL 12/1- 12/31/01 001 - 155410 - 641150 -00000 0.00 80.54 0.00 80.54 201370 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20009094 A2125218BL 12/1. 12/31/01 408 - 210151 - 641150 -00000 0.00 21.10 0.00 21.10 201190 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20011723 A2102082CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 111 - 138911 - 641150 -00000 0.00 46.65 0.00 46.65 153045 1 /1- 1/31/02 PAGING 20009103 A2102038BL 12/1- 12/31/01 001- 454010 - 641150.00000 0.00 5.95 0.00 5.95 202083 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20011730 A2118449CA 1 /1. 1/31/02 001 - 178985 - 641150 -00000 0.00 26.85 0.00 26.85 200412 1 /1- 1/31/02 PGRS 20009689 A2101777BL 12/1. 12/31/01 490 - 144610 - 634999 -00000 0.00 392.14 0.00 392.14 200118 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SVS JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA 16J2AGE 144 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20009096 A2102085BL 12/1- 12/31/01 681 - 421510. 641150 -00000 0.00 68.16 0.00 68.16 201323 12/1. 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20009134 A2117053BL 12/1- 12/31/01 001. 144210- 641150 -00000 0.00 59.29 0.00 59.29 201015 12/1 - 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20009100 A2115235BL 12/1- 12/31/01 001 - 121143 - 641150.00000 0.00 8.54 0.00 8.54 201564 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20011741 A2106885 1 /1- 1/31/02 521- 122410. 641150 -00000 0.00 28.81 0.00 28.81 200935 1 /1. 1/31/02 PGRS 20009688 A2102151BL 12/1- 12/31/01 111 - 156343 - 641150 -00000 0.00 10.90 111 - 156349 - 641150 -00000 0.00 28.85 111. 156380- 641150 -00000 0.00 2.95 0.00 42.70 201718 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20009129 A2101971BL 12/1- 12/31/01 101 - 163630. 641150.00000 0.00 59.76 0.00 59.76 200040 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20009106 A2008785BL 11/15. 12/14/01 495 - 192330. 641150 -00000 0.00 17.07 0.00 17.07 202271 11/15 - 12/14/01 PAGER SUS 20009084 A2106885BL 12/1. 12/31/01 521. 122410. 641150.00000 0.00 28.81 0.00 28.81 200935 12/1. 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20009097 A2106862BL 12/1- 12/31/01 681. 431310 - 641150 -00000 0.00 21.97 0.00 21.97 201336 12/1. 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20011750 A2103950CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 144 - 144360 - 641150 -00000 0.00 20.82 0.00 20.82 200595 1 /1- 1/31/02 PGRS 20011726 A2014704CA 1 /1. 1/31/02 495 - 192350 - 641150 -00000 0.00 8.54 0.00 8.54 202272 1 /1- 1/31/02 PGRS 20011731 A2115235CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 001 - 121141 - 641150 -00000 0.00 8.54 0.00 8.54 201350 1 /1- 1/31/02 PGRS 20011736 A2106862CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 681 - 431310 - 641150 -00000 0.00 21.97 0.00 21.97 201336 1 /1- 1/31/02 PGRS 20009673 A2005908BL 12/1 - 12/31/01 408 - 253211 - 641150.00000 0.00 2.95 0.00 2.95 201147 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SV 20009673 A2005371BL 12/1- 12/31/01 408 - 253212. 641150 -00000 0.00 21.50 0.00 21.50 201147 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SV 20009104 A2120464BL 12/1. 12/31/01 001 - 122240 - 641150 -00000 0.00 103.27 0.00 103.27 202220 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SVS JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 20009107 A2014704BL 12/1 - 12/31/01 REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 202272 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20011746 A2115462CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 0.00 113 - 138900 - 641150.00000 200128 1 /1- 1/31/02 PGRS 101 - 163620- 641150.00000 20009135 A2103318BL 12/1- 12/31/01 0.00 495 - 192370. 641150 -00000 201132 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20011725 A2013996CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 0.00 111 - 156310 - 641150 -00000 203400 1 /1- 1/31/02 PGERS 111 - 156313. 641150 -00000 20009105 A2119934BL 12/1- 12/31/01 0.00 111 - 156425 - 641150 -00000 202268 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20009101 A2101970BL 12/1- 12/31/01 0.00 114 - 178970- 641150 -00000 201745 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20009688 A2102151BL 12/1- 12/31/01 0.00 201717 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SUS 20011735 A2102051CA 1/1- 1/31/02 201370 1 /1. 1/31/02 PGRS 20009128 A2003906BL 11 /1- 11/30/01 107411 11 /1- 11/30/01 PAGER SVS 20009131 A2013336BL 12/1. 12/31/01 200340 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20012023 A2119934CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 202268 1 /1- 1/31/02 PAGING SV 20011738 A2006266CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 201231 1 /1- 1/31/02 PGRS 20011733 A2102151CA 1 /1. 1/31/02 201717 1 /1. 1/31/02 PAGERS 20011748 A2101777CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 200118 1 /1- 1/31/02 PGRS 20011739 A2008500CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA VCHR DISC BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 495 - 192350 - 641150 -00000 0.00 113 - 138900 - 641150.00000 0.00 101 - 163620- 641150.00000 0.00 408 - 210155- 641150 -00000 0.00 495 - 192370. 641150 -00000 0.00 109 - 182601 - 641150 -00000 0.00 109. 182900- 641150 -00000 0.00 111 - 156310 - 641150 -00000 0.00 111 - 156313. 641150 -00000 0.00 111 - 156341 - 641150 -00000 0.00 111 - 156425 - 641150 -00000 0.00 001 - 155410 - 641150 -00000 0.00 123 - 155975. 641150.33075 0.00 114 - 178970- 641150 -00000 0.00 495. 192370- 641150 -00000 0.00 470 - 173410 - 641150 -00000 0.00 111 - 156310 - 641150 -00000 0.00 111 - 156313 - 641150 -00000 0.00 111 - 156341 - 641150.00000 0.00 111. 156425- 641150 -00000 0.00 490. 144610- 634999 -00000 0.00 111 - 156332 - 641150 -00000 0.00 16J2AGE 145 AMT NET VCHR DISC 8.54 0.00 2.97 0.00 23.02 0.00 20.00 0.00 36.43 0.00 2.97 2.98 0.00 37.09 5.90 38.52 2.95 0.00 76.31 0.00 19.94 0.00 11.90 0.00 134.15 0.00 8.54 0.00 13.85 5.90 37.45 3.97 0.00 298.85 0.00 88.68 VCHR NET 8.54 2.97 23.02 20.00 36.43 5.95 84.46 76.31 19.94 11.90 134.15 8.54 61.17 298.85 JANUARY 30, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 201138 10/1. 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20011711 A2005908CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 201147 1 /1- 1/31/02 PAGERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 201201 1 /1- 1/31/02 PGRS BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 20009108 A2013996BK 11 /1. 11/30/01 REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 203400 11 /1- 11/30/01 PAGER SVS 20009108 A2013996BL 12/1- 12/31/01 0.00 001. 156363- 641150 -00000 203400 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SUS 20011724 A2015434CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 0.00 669 - 100220 - 634999 -00000 203748 1 /1- 1/31/02 BEEPERS 408. 210125 - 641150 -00000 20009673 A2005371BL 12/1- 12/31/01 0.00 495 - 192330. 641150 -00000 201147 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SV 20009100 A2120817BL 12/1- 12/31/01 0.00 111. 156380. 641150 -00000 201564 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20012021 A2008785CA 12/15- 1/14/02 0.00 146 - 144380. 641150 -00000 202271 12/15- 1/14/02 LOCKBOX 20011732 A2102151CA 1 /1. 1/31/02 408 - 233351 - 641150.00000 0.00 201718 1 /1- 1/31/02 PGRS 0.00 20011727 A2120464CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 408 - 233313 - 641150 -00000 0.00 202220 1 /1- 1/31/02 PGRS 0.00 20011737 A2102085CA 1 /1. 1/31/02 408- 253211 - 641150 -00000 0.00 201323 1 /1- 1/31/02 PGRS 0.00 20009130 A2120608BL 12/1. 12/31/01 200306 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20009098 A2115235BL 12/1- 12/31/01 201350 12/1 - 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20009093 A2003669BL 10 /1. 12/31/01 201138 10/1. 12/31/01 PAGER SVS 20011711 A2005908CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 201147 1 /1- 1/31/02 PAGERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA VCHR DISC BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111. 156334- 641150 -00000 0.00 001. 156363- 641150 -00000 0.00 408 - 210155 - 641150.00000 0.00 408 - 210155. 641150.00000 0.00 669 - 100220 - 634999 -00000 0.00 408. 210125 - 641150 -00000 0.00 001 - 121143 - 641150 -00000 0.00 495 - 192330. 641150 -00000 0.00 111 - 156343 - 641150 -00000 0.00 111. 156349- 641150 -00000 0.00 111. 156380. 641150 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 641150 -00000 0.00 681 - 421510 - 641150 -00000 0.00 146 - 144380. 641150 -00000 0.00 001 - 121141 - 641150 -00000 0.00 408 - 233351 - 641150.00000 0.00 408 - 233312 - 641150.00000 0.00 408 - 233352 - 641150 -00000 0.00 408 - 233313 - 641150 -00000 0.00 408 - 233350 - 641150 -00000 0.00 408 - 210130 - 641150 -00000 0.00 408- 253211 - 641150 -00000 0.00 408 - 253221 - 641150 -00000 0.00 16J2AGE 146 AMT NET VCHR DISC 11.90 96.68 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 0.00 13.58 0.00 8.50 0.00 14.11 0.00 17.07 0.00 10.90 28.85 2.95 0.00 113.22 0.00 68.16 0.00 20.69 0.00 8.54 0.00 156.64 36.99 34.00 17.00 14.40 156.64 0.00 2.95 17.10 0.00 VCHR NET 197.26 20.00 20.00 13.58 8.50 14.11 17.07 42.70 113.22 68.16 20.69 8.54 415.67 20.05 JANUARY 30. 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20009132 A2118449BL 12/1- 12/31/01 200412 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SV 20011749 A2013336CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 200340 1 /1- 1/31/02 PGRS 20009108 A2013996BJ 10 /01- 10/31/01 203400 10 /01- 10/31/01 PAGER SUS 20011740 A2005371CA 1/1- 1/31/02 201147 1 /1- 1/31/02 PGRS 20011734 A2120817CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 201564 1 /1- 1/31/02 PAGERS 20011747 A2101971CA 1 /1- 1/31/02 200040 1 /1- 1/31/02 PGRS 20009673 A2005371BL 12/1- 12/31/01 201147 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SV 20009102 A2014611BL 12/1. 12/31/01 201837 12/1- 12/31/01 PAGER SUS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 178985 - 641150 -00000 0.00 114. 178970- 641150 -00000 0.00 408 - 210155. 641150 -00000 0.00 408. 210105 - 641150 -00000 0.00 408. 210125- 641150 -00000 0.00 408 - 253211. 641150 -00000 0.00 408 - 253212 - 641150 -00000 0.00 001. 121143. 641150 -00000 0.00 101. 163630. 641150 -00000 0.00 408 - 253211 - 641150 -00000 0.00 113 - 138910 - 641150 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569239 VENDOR 346870 - VIBES TECHNOLOGIES 20012014 641535 123 - 155975 - 651910.33075 151513 OFFICE EQUIP. CHECK NO 568833 VENDOR 19260 - VICS SHOE REPAIR 20011745 9060000186 101 - 163620 - 652140 -00000 200952 SHOES CHECK NO 568952 VENDOR 180740 - VINEYARDS UTILITY. INC. 20011710 ACC.347 12/31/01 111. 156332- 643400 -00000 ACC.347 12/31/01 16J2,PAGE 147 AMT NET VCHR DISC 16.90 0.00 11.90 0.00 20.20 0.00 39.05 8.50 2.95 26.20 0.00 8.54 0.00 59.76 0.00 2.95 0.00 2.97 0.0c CHECK TOTAL 0.0( 0.00 310.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 132.85 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 282.70 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 16.90 11.90 20.20 76.70 8.54 59.76 2.95 2.97 3,141.21 310.00 310.00 132.85 132.85 282.70 282.70 6 J 2,PAGE 148 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 569335 VENDOR 900080 - VIRGINIA WORLEY 301177 AMB.REF V.WORLEY 9/17/01 490 - 000000. 116004 -00000 0.00 60.98 0.00 AMB.REF V.WORLEY #0133005 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569277 VENDOR 350960 - VISION SERVICE PLAN -(IC) 20012423 01/02 VISION PREMIUM 517 - 121640. 645910 -00000 0.00 2,708.42 0.00 01/02 VISION PREMIUM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569170 VENDOR 322110 VISUAL EDGE TECHNOLOGY ENGINEERING 20011744 14430 101. 163630 - 634999 -00000 0.00 95.09 0.00 153054 METER CHARGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568958 VENDOR 185990 VWR SCIENTIFIC 20011743 9652370 408. 233350. 652310 -00000 0.00 20.52 0.00 200727 CHEM. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568834 VENDOR 19370 WALLACE INTERNATIONAL 20011717 FC69561 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 15.80 0.00 200937 PARTS 20011716 FC69442 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 80.52 0.00 200937 SWITCH 20011717 FC69865 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 423.51 0.00 200937 PARTS 20011717 FC69816 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 5.81 0.00 200937 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569336 VENDOR 900080 - WALTER BASCHE 301139 AMB.REF W.RASCHE 9/29/01 490 - 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 60.08 0.00 AMB.REF W.RASCHE #0133963 -2 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA VCHR NET REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 240.00 80.00 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 0.00 240.00 FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 568850 VENDOR 109110 - WASTE MGMT OF COLLIER COUNTY 2.530.94 20011704 0061592 - 0332 -9 195. 110406- 634999 -10264 0.00 160.00 104313 DEC /01 SV 0.00 5,648.18 20012018 2431274/0061599 195 - 110406 - 634999.10264 0.00 0.00 2431274/0061599 104313 CHECK TOTAL 20011704 0061590 - 0332 -3 195 - 110406. 634999 -10264 0.00 104313 DEC /01 SV 20012417 1520214/61262 DEC /01 001 - 061010 - 643300.00000 0.00 1520214/61262 DEC /01 20012417 2433363/62214 DEC /01 111. 156349- 643300 -00000 0.00 2433363/62214 DEC /01 20012012 2429714/61494 12101 001. 122240. 643300 -00000 0.00 2429714/61494 12101 20012417 1521334/61295 DEC /01 408 - 233351. 643300 -00000 0.00 1521334/61295 DEC /01 20011704 0061591. 0332 -1 195. 110406 - 634999 -10264 0.00 104313 DEC /01 SV CHECK NO 569095 VENDOR 280890 - WATER RESOURCE SOLUTIONS INC 20011872 2474 -2 413 - 263611 - 763100 -73948 0.00 201751 12 -1 TO 12 -31 -01 16J2eAGE 149 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 240.00 0.00 240.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 240.00 0.00 240.00 435.77 0.00 435.77 184.74 0.00 184.74 1,776.73 0.00 1.776.73 2.530.94 0.00 2.530.94 160.00 0.00 160.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,648.18 47,116.10 0.00 47.116.10 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 47,116.10 CHECK NO 568900 VENDOR 151900 WATER TREATMENT & CONTROL CO. 20011713 053495 441 - 256110. 652310 -00000 0.00 189.93 0.00 189.93 151205 FERT. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 189.93 CHECK NO 569337 VENDOR 900080 WAYNE LEECE 301179 AMB.REF W.LEECE 5/4/01 490. 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 35.00 0.00 35.00 AMB.REF W.LEECE #0121641 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 35.00 CHECK NO 568875 VENDOR 129350 - WELLESLEY INN 6J2AGE 150 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012016 P4444 -01 R.LOBER 681 - 421190. 634405 -00000 0.00 49.05 0.00 P4444.01 R.LOBER 01- 2392CFA 20012015 P44440 -00 D.MCDANIEL 681 - 421190 - 634405 -00000 0.00 56.94 0.00 P4444 -00 D.MCDANIEL 00- 2392 -CFA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569198 VENDOR 332390 - WENDY KLOPF 20012057 1/17 MBA LUNCH W KLOPF 191 - 138785 - 654360 -33752 0.00 15.00 0.00 1/17 MBA LUNCH W KLOPF CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569338 VENDOR 900080 - WERNER H. SCHROEDER 301143 AMB.REF W.SCHROEDER 12/14 490 - 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 335.00 0.00 AMB.REF W.SCHROEDER #0106751 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568961 VENDOR 187030 - WEST PUBLISHING CORPORATION 20011715 800961015 001 - 432040- 654110.00000 0.00 50.50 0.00 153255 BOOK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568835 VENDOR 19660 WEST PUBLISHING PAYMENT CENTER 20011714 800960527 001 - 432020. 654110.00000 0.00 10.00 0.00 153195 BOOK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569339 VENDOR 900080 WILLIAM B.MURPHY 301178 AMB.REF W.MURPHY 4/20/01 490. 000000- 116004 -00000 0.00 45.03 0.00 AMB.REF W.MURPHY #0120214 -1 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 568960 VENDOR 186530 - WILLIAM J. VARIAN CONSTRUCTION CO. 20012020 #18 001 - 122240. 634999 -00000 0.00 850.00 0.00 152724 REPAIR SOFFIT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 JANUARY 30, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1411 GE 151 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED JANUARY 29, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 569256 VENDOR 349810 - WILLIAMS & WILLIAMS INC. 20012421 2005 001 - 144510. 652120 -00000 0.00 378.95 0.00 153102 NAME TAGS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 378.95 378.95 CHECK NO 569261 VENDOR 350400 WINN DIXIE STORE #729 20012019 575051 001 - 155410 - 652210.00000 0.00 200.00 0.00 200.00 153295 DOG FOOD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 200.00 CHECK NO 569005 VENDOR 223690 XEROX CORPORATION 20011712 86200859 11/29- 12/27/01 109 - 182601 - 644600 -00000 0.00 78.76 109 - 182900 - 644600 -00000 0.00 78.76 778. 182700- 644600 -00000 0.00 78.76 0.00 236.28 200112 11/29- 12/27/01 RENT.COPIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 236.28 CHECK NO 569117 VENDOR 291110 - ZAMBELLI FIREWORKS INTERNATIONAL 20007434 011589 111 - 156341. 634999 -00000 0.00 4,900.00 0.00 4,900.00 202897 FIREWORKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,900.00 557 CHECKS WRITTEN GRAND TOTAL 0.00 3,079,006.31 16J2 Q: /Manual Checks /APMLOG BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A/P Manual Check Log DATE ISSUED TO: CK # AMOUNT 1/23/2002 FGUA 305 15,035.00 1/23/2002 United States Postal Service 306 125.00 1/24/2001 City of Naples 307 104,765.07 1/24/2002 District School Board of Collier County 308 477,489.00 112412002 Clerk, First District Court Of Appeals 309 250.00 1/24/2002 Inner Circle 310 7,500.00 1/24/2002 Dream Street Entertainment 311 7,000.00 1/24/2002 Seriuos Business, Inc 312 12,500.00 1/24/2002 Squire Management 313 9,500.00 1/24/2002 Ruby Blue 314 5,000.00 1/29/2002 Sun life of Canada 315 4,063.40 1/29/2002 Sun life of Canada 316 3,121.43 1129/2002 Sun life of Canada 317 32,146.68 1/29/2002 Check Run Beginning 568737 1/29/2002 Check Run Ending 569343 Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County, Florida Finance & Accounting Department MEMORANDUM Date: 02/08/02 To: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners From: Constance C. Murray, General Operations Manager Finance Department /Clerk to the Board Re: Board of County Commissioners Disbursements 16.2 FEB 13 2002 'Darr' of County C"MISSionerx Please find attached a listing of the disbursements for the Board of County Commissioners for the period February 2,2002 through February 8, 2002. In accordance with Florida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(1) I request that these reports be included as miscellaneous correspondence to the Board of County Commissioners and made part of the official records. If you have any questions regarding this correspondence, please telephone me at 774- 8481. :.:. A!u Q: /Manual Checks /APMLOG BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A/P Manual Check Log DATE ISSUED TO: CK # 1/11/2002 Jane McDonald 295 1/14/2002 District Twenty Medical Examiner 296 1/15/2002 Office Of The State Courts Admin. 297 1/15/2002 Check Run Beginning 567678 1/15/2002 Check Run Ending 568243 16J2 AMOUNT 117.00 28,475.00 6,728.71 Q: /Manual Checks /APMLOG BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A/P Manual Check Log DATE ISSUED TO: CK # 1117/2002 City of Naples 298 1/18/2002 Collier county Womans Bar Assoc. 299 1/1812002 Sun life of Canada 300 1/18/2002 Holiday Inn Express 301 1/1812002 Kurt Zeitler 302 1/22/2002 Doubletree Guest Suites 303 1/22/2002 Doubletree Guest Suites 304 1/22/2002 Check Run Beginning 568244 1/22/2002 Check Run Ending 568736 16J2 AMOUNT 27,752.98 36.00 33,892.00 375.00 117.00 199.00 199.00 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 16J2GE , VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 569703 VENDOR 273240 - 21ST CENTURY ONCOLOGY 0.00 820.66 0.00 2,850.00 20013189 E GONZALEZ 12120 -21 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 365.96 0.00 365.96 204110 E GONZALEZ 12/20 -21 20013189 E GONZALES 12/21,31 -1/2,4 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 972.13 0.00 972.13 204110 E GONZALES 12/21,31 -1/2.4 20013189 L CROSBY 12/18 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 1,206.13 0.00 1,206.13 204110 L CROSBY 20013189 E GONZALEZ 12/17 -20 001 - 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 981.51 0.00 981.51 204110 E GONZALEZ 12/17 -20 20013189 L SANTOS 12/18 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 203.66 0.00 203.66 204110 L SANTOS 12/18 20013189 E GONZALEZ 12/4 26 8/31 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 790.07 0.00 790.07 204110 E GONZALEZ 12/4 24 8/31 20013189 L CROSBY 12/19 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 922.47 0.00 922.47 204110 L CROSBY 12/19 20013189 L CROSBY 12/19 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 370.16 0.00 370.16 204110 L CROSBY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,812.09 CHECK NO 569700 VENDOR 271770 - AA ELECTRONICS S.E. INC. 20012769 210956.00 01/09 408 - 233351 - 763100 -00000 0.00 2,054.80 0.00 2,054.80 203684 MOTORTRONIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,054.80 CHECK NO 569692 VENDOR 267110 - AAA EXPRESS BAIL BONDS 20013297 01 -6154 MMA BRYAN 001- 431510 - 351100.00000 01 -6154 MMA AAA EXPRESS BRYAN 20013297 99.0663 -CFA WILLIAMSON 001 - 431510 - 351100 -00000 99- 0663 -CFA AAA EXPRESS WILLIAMSON 20013297 99- 942 -CFA MAKOWSKI 001- 431510 - 351100 -00000 99- 942 -CFA AAA EXPRESS MAKOWSKI 20013297 99- 4255 -MMA GARCIA 001- 431510. 351100.00000 99- 4255 -MMA AAA EXPRESS GARCIA 0.00 1,985.40 0.00 1,985.40 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 820.66 0.00 820.66 0.00 2,850.00 0.00 2,850.00 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS G02 -0092 01/16 001. 122240- 634999 -00000 450.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 20012636 G02 -0062 01 /10 -01 /11 FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 20013297 98- 10466 -MMA TORRES 001. 431510 - 351100 -00000 0.00 20012770 98- 10466 -MMA AAA EXPRESS TORRES 001 - 122240 - 634999 -00000 20013297 00- 1269 -CFA HOLYWORTH 001 - 431510 - 351100.00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 634999 -00000 00- 1269 -CFA AAA EXPRESS HOLYWORTH 201559 REPAIR / MAINTANCE 20013297 00- 2680 -MMA RAMIREZ 001 - 431510 - 351100.00000 0.00 201559 REPAIR / MAINTANCE 00- 2680 -MMA AAA EXPRESS RAMIREZ 20012770 G02.0093 01/16 20013297 00. 9055-MMA PIERRESAINT 001 - 431510- 351100 -00000 0.00 20012770 00- 9055 -MMA AAA EXPRESS PIERRESAINT 001- 122240 - 634999 -00000 CHECK NO 569549 VENDOR 161100 - AAA GENERATOR & PUMP INC. 20012770 G02 -0092 01/16 001. 122240- 634999 -00000 450.00 201559 REPAIR / MAINTANCE 475.00 20012636 G02 -0062 01 /10 -01 /11 408. 233352- 634999 -00000 311.33 203380 REPAIR / MAINTANCE 212.89 20012681 G01 -1158 11/09 188- 140480 - 646970 -00000 201344 MAINTANCE 20012770 G02 -0091 01/16 001 - 122240 - 634999 -00000 201559 REPAIR / MAINTANCE 20012770 G02 -0030 01/05 001 - 122240 - 634999 -00000 201559 REPAIR / MAINTANCE 20012770 G02 -0029 01/05 001- 122240- 634999 -00000 201559 REPAIR / MAINTANCE 20012770 G02.0093 01/16 001. 122240- 646970 -00000 201559 REPAIR / MAINTANCE 20012770 G02 -0067 01 /11 001- 122240 - 634999 -00000 201559 REPAIR / MAINTANCE CHECK NO 569735 VENDOR 285940 - AACTION MULCH OF SW FL, INC. 20012766 21220 01/09 111 - 163646 - 646318 -00000 201896 MULCH GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY CHECK NO 569715 VENDOR 277650 - AARON'S COFFEE SERVICE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16J2AGE _ AMT NET VCHR DISC 1,800.00 0.00 7,000.00 0.00 450.00 0.00 475.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 160.54 0.00 485.00 0.00 163.44 0.00 145.81 0.00 261.43 0.00 603.93 0.00 311.33 0.00 212.89 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 6,099.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 1,800.00 7,000.00 450.00 475.00 16,381.06 160.54 485.00 163.44 145.81 261.43 603.93 311.33 212.89 2,344.37 6,099.60 6,099.60 CHECK NO 569367 VENDOR 110 - ACTION AUTOMATIC DOOR CO FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J I GE 3 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012646 5023 01107 495 - 192370 - 634999 -00000 0.00 113.50 0.00 113.50 200154 COFFEE PILOT'S LOUNGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 113.50 CHECK NO 569744 VENDOR 288960 - ABLE BODY TEMPORARY SERVICE 20012994 115006744 109 - 182901 - 634999 -00000 0.00 2.411.56 0.00 2,411.56 200061 TEMPORARY LABOR 20012994 115006744 109. 182602- 634999 -00000 0.00 565.68 0.00 565.68 200061 TEMPORARY LABOR 20012652 115006680 109 - 182602 - 634999 -00000 0.00 586.01 0.00 586.01 200061 TEMPORARY LABOR 20012652 115006680 109 - 182901 - 634999 -00000 0.00 2,498.25 0.00 2,498.25 200061 TEMPORARY LABOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,061.50 CHECK NO 569368 VENDOR 120 ACCENT BUSINESS PRODUCTS 20012638 093841 01/15 111 - 156343 - 646710 -00000 0.00 27.50 0.00 27.50 201276 MAINTANCE 20012639 093785001/01 -02/01 130- 157710 - 646710 -00000 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 201279 MAINTANCE 20012638 093841 01/15 111 - 156343. 651210 -00000 0.00 17.23 0.00 17.23 201276 MAINTANCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 194.73 CHECK NO 569778 VENDOR 312530 ACCUSTANDARD 20012666 178470 8/6/01 408 - 253250 - 634999 -00000 0.00 160.00 0.00 160.00 MICRO SAMPLE FORMAL STUDY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 160.00 CHECK NO 569896 VENDOR 350310 - ACME PLASTICS. INC 20012669 690238 1/7 408- 253221 - 652990 -00000 0.00 485.16 0.00 485.16 POLYCARBONATE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 485.16 CHECK NO 569367 VENDOR 110 - ACTION AUTOMATIC DOOR CO FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012686 169289 01/17 152753 DOOR REPAIRS 20012686 171123 01/14 152753 DOOR REPAIRS 20012686 170487 01 /10 152753 DOOR REPAIRS 20012686 170908 01 /11 152753 DOOR REPAIRS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 122240 - 646110 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 646110 -00000 0.00 001- 122240 - 646110 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 646110 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569646 VENDOR 237550 - ADAMS TANK & LIFT INC. 20012991 85457 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 76.00 521 - 122450 - 646510 -00000 2490 01102 200830 REPAIRS /SITE INSPECTION 20012991 DISCOUNT 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 521 - 122450 - 646510 -00000 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 200830 REPAIRS /SITE INSPECTION 001 - 122240. 652997 -00000 20012991 DISCOUNT 521 - 122450- 646510 -00000 2473 12/31 200830 REPAIRS /SITE INSPECTION 20012991 85436 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 521 - 122450 - 646510 -00000 200830 REPAIRS /SITE INSPECTION CHECK NO 569727 VENDOR 282670 - ADVANCED AIR & REFRIGERATION, INC. 20012651 2574 01/08 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 76.00 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 76.00 20012651 2490 01102 001- 122240 - 652997 -00000 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2474 12/31 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2462 12/26 001 - 122240. 652997 -00000 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2473 12/31 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2572 01/08 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16J,16E 4 AMT NET VCHR DISC 25.00 0.00 152.00 0.00 76.00 0.00 76.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 172.15 0.00 10.83- 0.00 3.45- 0.00 541.54 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.00 0.00 69.00 0.00 25.00 0.00 69.00 0.00 621.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 VCHR NET 25.00 152.00 76.00 76.00 329.00 172.15 10.83- 3.45- 541.54 699.41 25.00 69.00 25.00 69.00 621.00 90.00 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 5 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012651 2575 01/08 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 0.00 37.50 0.00 37.50 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2554 01/07 001- 122240 - 652997.00000 0.00 621.00 0.00 621.00 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2438 12/26 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 0.00 90.59 0.00 90.59 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2491 01102 001 - 122240 - 652997.00000 0.00 414.00 0.00 414.00 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2463 12/18 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 0.00 276.00 0.00 276.00 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2464 12/18 001 - 122240. 652997 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2535 01/03 001 - 122240. 652997 -00000 0.00 12.50 0.00 12.50 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2439 12/26 001 - 122240. 652997 -00000 0.00 69.00 0.00 69.00 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2521 01/07 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 0.00 483.00 0.00 483.00 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2466 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 0.00 345.00 0.00 345.00 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2553 01/03 001- 122240. 652997 -00000 0.00 47.50 0.00 47.50 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2571 01/06 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 0.00 220.00 0.00 220.00 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2573 01/08 001 - 122240 - 652997.00000 0.00 276.00 0.00 276.00 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2465 12/27 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 0.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2552 01/07 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 0.00 12.50 0.00 12.50 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE 20012651 2516 01/04 001 - 122240 - 652997 -00000 0.00 276.00 0.00 276.00 201511 REPAIRS /MAINTANCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4.129.59 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J AGE 6 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 569847 VENDOR 338730 AEC NATIONAL /WILKINSON JOINT 20013281 17742 325 - 172951 - 631400 -31704 0.00 2,502.50 0.00 2,502.50 106280 THRU 12/30/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,502.50 CHECK NO 569613 VENDOR 203600 AFFORDABLE FENCE & SCREEN 20012683 GREENGATE MAINTANCE 1/7 001 - 122240 - 646110 -00000 0.00 868.00 0.00 868.00 203305 GREENGATE MAINTANCE 01/07 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 868.00 CHECK NO 569869 VENDOR 345100 - AFFORDABLE HEATING & COOLING, INC. 20013004 A NOTO 12/11/01 191 - 138785 - 884200 -33751 0.00 900.00 0.00 900.00 152646 VILLEREAL #38504320009 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 900.00 CHECK NO 569722 VENDOR 281770 - ALAN AND PATRICIA BOOLE 20012573 FEB 2002 001 - 061010 - 644100.00000 0.00 2,018.80 0.00 2,018.80 FEB 2002 201905 20012574 FEB 2002 001 - 061010 - 644100 -00000 0.00 2,100.00 0.00 2,100.00 FEB 2002 202261 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,118.80 CHECK NO 569571 VENDOR 172480 - ALAN PRODUCTIONS 20012980 1108 -01 G. ACEVEDO 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 1108 -01 G. ACEVEDO 20012980 0121 -02 A. FEGUEROA 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 0121 -02 A. FEGUEROA 20012980 0114 -02 J. BRENTLINGER 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 195.00 0.00 195.00 0114 -02 J. BRENTLINGER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 420.00 CHECK NO 569852 VENDOR 340640 - ALDO R. BERETTA, MD 20012767 A. HAMPTON 06/24 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 1,251.25 0.00 1,251.25 204111 A. HAMPTON 06/24 20012767 A. HAMPTON 01/03 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 104.00 0.00 104.00 204111 A. HAMPTON 01/03 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 7 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,355.25 CHECK NO 569758 VENDOR 298420 - ALISON BANK 20012768 PRESCHOOL 12/2- 1/25/02 111 - 156380 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1.963.65 0.00 1.963.65 PRESCHOOL 12/2- 1/25/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,963.65 CHECK NO 569498 VENDOR 127610 - ALL ANIMALS CLINIC 20012853 01/28 02 -9497 D. MACKARAV 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 200590 01/28 D. MACKARAVITY 20012853 01/28 02 -9580 B. RICH 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 200590 01128 B. RICH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.00 CHECK NO 569475 VENDOR 109450 - ALLIED UNIVERSAL CORPORATION 20012651 I0238746 01/03 408 - 233312 - 652310.00000 0.00 1,747.55 0.00 1,747.55 200688 COT -SOD HYPO 20012656 I0241411 01 /11 408- 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,385.65 0.00 1,385.65 202569 CHLORINE GAS 20012658 I0241215 01 /11 408 - 253211. 652310 -00000 0.00 1,187.70 0.00 1,187.70 202568 CHLORINE GAS 20012635 I0241592 408- 253211 - 652310 -00000 0.00 357.00 0.00 357.00 200378 COT -SOD HYPO 20012589 I0240484 01/08 408 - 233312 - 652310 -00000 0.00 821.86 0.00 821.86 202510 SODIUM HYDROXIDE 20012661 I0240211 01/08 408 - 233312 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,732.50 0.00 1,732.50 200688 COT -SOD HYPO 20012660 I0240532 01/08 408 - 233352 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,689.10 0.00 1,689.10 200741 COT -SOD HYPO 20012637 I0241403 01 /11 408. 233312- 652310 -00000 0.00 395.90 0.00 395.90 202511 CHLORINE 20012661 I0235808 12/21 408. 233312 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,683.50 0.00 1,683.50 200688 COT -SOD HYPO 20012659 I0240010 01/08 408 - 233312 - 652310.00000 0.00 2,329.28 0.00 2,329.28 202510 SODIUM HYDROX FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J ZGE 8 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012660 I0240145 01/08 408 - 233352 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,801.80 0.00 1.801.80 200741 COT -SOD HYPO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15.131.84 CHECK NO 569369 VENDOR 550 ALPHA OMEGA BUSINESS SYSTEMS 20012989 031822 12/06 -01/06 301 - 121125 - 644600 -01017 0.00 17.68 0.00 17.68 202503 RENTAL/ EXCESS COPIES 20012988 031875 01 110 -02110 113 - 138930 - 641950 -00000 0.00 2.35 0.00 2.35 200270 RENTAL /COPIES 20013045 0318950 01 /11 CREDIT 101 - 163620 - 646710 -00000 0.00 83.32- 0.00 83.32- 202275 CREDIT 20012988 031875 01 110 -02110 113 - 138930 - 651210 -00000 0.00 200.48 0.00 200.48 200270 RENTAL /COPIES 20012987 031856 01/09 111 - 156380 - 651210.00000 0.00 66.61 0.00 66.61 201296 MAINTANCE 20012988 031875 01 110 -02110 113. 138930- 644600.00000 0.00 83.25 0.00 83.25 200270 RENTAL /COPIES 20012987 031856 01/09 111 - 156380 - 646710.00000 0.00 44.70 0.00 44.70 201296 MAINTANCE 20013045 0318950 12/11 -1 /11 101- 163620 - 646710.00000 0.00 91.94 0.00 91.94 202275 COPIER SERVICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 423.69 CHECK NO 569622 VENDOR 212540 ALPINE BROADCASTING 20012571 FEB 2002 LEASE 188 - 140480 - 644600 -00000 0.00 3,503.02 0.00 3,503.02 FEB 2002 201346 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3.503.02 CHECK NO 569493 VENDOR 121930 ALUMINUM SPECIALTIES 20012684 18357 12/20 001 - 122240 - 646110.00000 0.00 950.00 0.00 950.00 203414 REPAIR PUMP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 950.00 CHECK NO 569856 VENDOR 342060 AMERICAN CONSULTING ENGINEERS,PLC 20013206 #3 313 - 163673 - 763100 -60012 0.00 33,728.65 0.00 33,728.65 201211 THRU 1/9/02 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16XIAGE 9 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013206 #3 RETAINAGE 313 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 3,372.86- 0.00 3,372.86- 201211 THRU 1/9/02 RETAINAGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 30,355.79 CHECK NO 569754 VENDOR 295120 - AMERICAN LAFRANCE MEDICMASTER 20012640 PSN010361 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 320.20 0.00 320.20 200837 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 320.20 CHECK NO 569370 VENDOR 730 - AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION 20012984 MEMBERSHIP DUES D. SCOTT 101 - 163612 - 654210 -00000 0.00 339.00 0.00 339.00 MEMBERSHIP DUES D. SCOTT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 339.00 CHECK NO 569879 VENDOR 347200 - AMERISUITES 20013342 100865086 J MCDONALD 2/13 301 - 121125 - 640300 -01017 0.00 336.42 0.00 336.42 204181 J MCDONALD 20013342 101640095 J TAYLOR 2/13 301. 121125. 640300 -01017 0.00 336.42 0.00 336.42 204181 J TAYLOR 2/13 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 672.84 CHECK NO 569807 VENDOR 326290 - AMY SEGO 20013269 1/22 -31 TRVL A SEGO 123. 155975. 640200 -33075 0.00 22.62 123 - 155975 - 640300 -33075 0.00 159.05 0.00 181.67 1/22 -31 TRVL A SEGO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 181.67 CHECK NO 569838 VENDOR 336510 - ANCHOR TREE SERVICE 20012675 REMOVAL SABEL PALMS 001 - 156363 - 646314 -00000 0.00 499.00 0.00 499.00 REMOVE SABAL PALMS BAREFOOT BEACH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 499.00 CHECK NO 569851 VENDOR 340510 - ANCHOR TREE SERVICE 20012668 2001110975 REMOVAL TREES 111 - 138911- 634804 -00000 0.00 750.00 0.00 750.00 2001110975 REMOVAL OF TREES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 750.00 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J I GE 10 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 569770 VENDOR 306500 ANDREA TAYLOR 20012590 1/16 -17 TRVL A TAYLOR 001. 156130- 640300 -00000 0.00 28.24 0.00 28.24 1/16 -17 TRVL A TAYLOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 28.24 CHECK NO 569641 VENDOR 233010 ANIMALIFE VETERINARY CENTER, P.A. 20012852 02 -9579 K. TIERLUKIS 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 200922 01/29 K. TIERLUKIS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 75.00 CHECK NO 569697 VENDOR 271090 - ANTHONY M. D'AGOSTINO, M.D. 20012685 A. QUATRALE 01102 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 65.00 01/02 SERVICE A. QUATRALE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 65.00 CHECK NO 569528 VENDOR 147700 APAC OF FLORIDA, INC 20011879 #20 313 - 163673 - 763100 -63041 0.00 197,883.62 0.00 197,883.62 4575 THRU 12/30/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 197,883.62 CHECK NO 569551 VENDOR 161840 AQUIFER MAINTENANCE & PERFORMANCE 20012655 21379 01/25 408 - 253221 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 200417 WELLFIELD MAINTANCE 20012880 21370 01/19 408 - 253212 - 634999.00000 0.00 5,750.00 0.00 5.750.00 200199 WELL MAINTANCE 20012655 21379 01/25 408 - 253221 - 634999 -00000 0.00 96.00- 0.00 96.00- 200417 DISCOUNT 20012880 21370 01/19 408- 253212 - 634999.00000 0.00 460.00- 0.00 460.00- 200199 DISCOUNT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,394.00 CHECK NO 569708 VENDOR 274430 - ARNOLD PROPERTIES. INC. 20012557 FEB 2002 UNIT 13 001 - 061010 - 644100 -00000 0.00 1.338.33 0.00 1,338.33 FEB 2002 201917 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,338.33 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA VCHR NET REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 38.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 0.00 48.00 FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 569764 VENDOR 302200 - AROMA EXPRESSIONS INC CHECK TOTAL 20012645 3129 01/08 495 - 192370. 634999 -00000 0.00 2,425.50 200360 SCENTED DEODERIZERS 0.00 2,425.50 CHECK NO 569530 VENDOR 148190 - ARSENE MAJUSTE 20012687 1/17 8:00 -11:00 3.0 HR 681- 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 1/17 8:00 -11:00 3.0 HR 20012687 1 /11 9:00 -10:00 1 HR 681 - 421190 - 634402.00000 0.00 1 /11 9:00 -10:00 1 HR 20012687 1/11 10:00 -11:30 1.5 HR 681 - 431590 - 634402.00000 0.00 1 /11 10:00 -11:30 1.5 HR 20012687 1 /11 8:00.9:00 1 HR 681 - 421190. 634402.00000 0.00 1 /11 8:00.9:00 1 HR CHECK NO 569626 VENDOR 216040 - ASTOR CHEMICAL 20012649 348 01/14 408 - 253211 - 652310 -00000 0.00 200379 CARBON DIOXIDE CHECK NO 569803 VENDOR 323320 - AT & T 20012993 730 511 5584 001 01/08 01/08 730 511 5584 001 774 -9370 20012986 056 286 0862 001 12121 202513 657 -9003 20012854 056 287 5665 001 01/15 793 -7520 20012854 056 286 1439 001 12/21 793.0618 20012854 730 511 5496 001 01/18 774.5148 20012854 056 282 5843 001 12/13 334 -1040 16J2AGE 11 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 38.00 0.00 38.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 38.00 48.00 0.00 48.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 104.00 2,425.50 0.00 2,425.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,425.50 313 - 163611- 641210 -00000 0.00 8.76 0.00 8.76 495 - 192330 - 641900.00000 0.00 74.75 0.00 74.75 521 - 122450 - 641400.00000 0.00 14.02 0.00 14.02 001. 443010- 641900 -00000 0.00 13.69 0.00 13.69 001 - 156180 - 641210 -00000 0.00 37.48 0.00 37.48 001 - 443010. 641900 -00000 0.00 19.37 0.00 19.37 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 9.56 20012993 058 063 1831 001 01/06 FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 01/06 058 063 1831 001 657 -2525 20012854 730 511 5522 001 001 - 443010. 641210 -00000 0.00 12/18 774 -5952 0.00 20012854 056 286 1406 001 495 - 192370 - 641900 -00000 0.00 12121 775 -0534 0.00 20012854 056 282 5843 001 001 - 100110- 641210 -00000 0.00 01/13 334 -1040 0.00 20012854 730 510 4853 001 441 - 256110 - 641100 -00000 0.00 01/06 394 -3355 0.00 20012986 056 284 4627 001 12/22 681 - 431310 - 641900 -00000 0.00 202513 657 -9795 0.00 20012993 730 511 5515 001 01/08 408 - 210151 - 641100 -00000 0.00 01/08 730 511 5515 001 774 -5653 20012854 730 511 5457 001 01/18 774 -4010 20012854 056 282 5963 001 01/13 353 -6816 20012854 730 510 5580 001 01/18 774 -9222 20012993 056 282 6124 001 01/13 01/13 056 282 6124 001 394 -6750 20012993 730 511 5584 001 01/08 01/08 073 511 5584 001 774.9370 20012854 056 282 7604 001 01/13 793 -2234 20012995 730 511 2831 001 12/27 202351 657 -8336 20012854 056 282 5925 001 01/13 597 -8444 20012854 730 511 5383 001 01/18 774 -1667 20012854 056 283 9336 001 12/31 643 -4117 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 9.56 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 113 - 138722 - 641900 -00000 0.00 001 - 443010. 641210 -00000 0.00 001 - 443010 - 641900 -00000 0.00 001 - 443010. 641900 -00000 0.00 495 - 192370 - 641900 -00000 0.00 495 - 192330 - 641900.00000 0.00 001 - 155810 - 641900 -00000 0.00 001 - 100110- 641210 -00000 0.00 408 - 253211. 641100 -00000 0.00 470 - 173410 - 641210 -00000 0.00 441 - 256110 - 641100 -00000 0.00 101 - 163609 - 641210 -00000 0.00 198 - 157410 - 641900 -00000 0.00 681 - 431310 - 641900 -00000 0.00 001 - 156170 - 641900 -00000 0.00 001 - 155230. 641900 -00000 0.00 408 - 210151 - 641100 -00000 0.00 16J24GE 12 AMT NET VCHR DISC 9.56 0.00 10.86 0.00 13.69 0.00 19.83 0.00 364.42 16.36 26.59 12.30 14.02 20.17 14.81 8.76 13.88 20.59 13.88 65.13 16.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 9.56 10.86 13.69 19.83 364.42 16.36 26.59 12.30 14.02 20.17 14.81 8.76 13.88 20.59 13.88 65.13 16.73 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION CHECK NO 569644 VENDOR 236190 - AT &T 20012855 020 112 1860 001 01/16 01/16 793 -3671 20012855 730 510 6293 001 01/09 01/09 455 -8088 20012678 030 295 0956 001 1/7 030 295 0956 001 1/7 325 -0445 20012678 030 091 6198 001 1/9 030 091 6198 001 1/9 325 -0445 20012855 020 112 1860 001 01/16 01/16 793 -3671 20012855 030 159 3399 001 01/15 01/15 643 -5506 20012855 730 510 3638 001 01112 01112 352 -7000 20012985 730 510 1276 001 01/12 01/12 730 510 1276 001 262 -4130 20012985 030 310 9154 001 12/28 12/28 030 310 9154 001 774 -8388 20012855 730 511 5702 001 01/21 01121 775 -2007 20012678 030 091 6198 001 1/9 030 091 6198 001 1/9 325 -0445 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521 - 122450 - 641400 -00000 001. 156140- 641900 -00000 001 - 121710 - 641400 -00000 408 - 253211 - 641100.00000 521 - 122410 - 641400 -00000 001- 144510 - 641900 -00000 408 - 253221 - 641100 -00000 001 - 156110 - 641900 -00000 001 - 122240 - 641900 -00000 408 - 253212 - 641100 -00000 408 - 253212 - 641100 -00000 CHECK NO 569830 VENDOR 333620 - AT &T WIRELESS 20012677 10058439 01/05 001 - 010110 - 641700 -00000 200298 370.0483 20012676 100326127 01/05 681 - 421510 - 641700 -00000 201311 216 -0429 CHECK NO 569772 VENDOR 309230 - ATTORNEYS' TITLE INSURANCE FUND INC 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16J2vGE 1_ AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.21 16.75 22.28 13.90 43.86 30.75 135.46 21.87 13.35 56.46 12.36 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 829.65 1.21 16.75 22.28 13.90 43.86 30.75 135.46 21.87 13.35 56.46 12.36 368.25 0.00 514.46 0.00 514.46 0.00 205.51 0.00 205.51 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 719.97 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 20012674 64- 2001 - 006316 101 - 163610 - 631650 -00000 0.00 TITLE SEARCH WOODSTOCK OF MASSEY ST CHECK NO 569510 VENDOR 134450 AUDIO VISUAL INNOVATIONS 175.00 20012679 165728 1/9 001. 156110- 651110 -00000 0.00 175.00 POSTER PAPER 0.00 469.75 CHECK NO 569535 VENDOR 152350 AUREUS INTERNATIONAL 469.75 20012657 0009849 -IN 01/07 001. 144510- 652110 -00000 0.00 0.00 200570 FLIGHT SUITS 75.00 0.00 CHECK NO 569738 VENDOR 286720 AZTEK COMMUNICATIONS 0.00 20012672 1698 1 /11 001 - 144210. 652990 -00000 0.00 40.00 INSTALL DATA LINE FOR GIS PRINTER 40.00 178.75 20012642 1674 01/04 111 - 156310. 634999 -00000 0.00 282.00 201261 PHONE LINES GOLDEN GATE 0.00 40.00 20012990 1684 01/07 408 - 210130. 634999 -00000 0.00 0.00 01/07 TEST MAIN PHONE LINE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20012644 1700 01 /11 001- 121141. 634999.00000 0.00 201352 WIRING MAINTANCE 20012680 1672 12/27 408 - 210130- 634999 -00000 0.00 MATERIAL /LABOR TO INSTALL PHONE 20012673 1697 1 /11 301 - 120435 - 763100.80525 0.00 TIME /MATERIAL DATA WIRE J.LEAMERS 20012641 1699 01 /11 111. 156395 - 634999 -00000 0.00 201265 MAX HASSE CHECK NO 569512 VENDOR 137960 - AZULE INDUSTRIES, INC. 20012643 2002021 01/08 001 - 155410 - 652910 -00000 0.00 200576 REDWOOD URNS 16JI GE AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 175.00 0.00 175.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 175.00 469.75 0.00 469.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 469.75 2,946.50 0.00 2,946.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,946.50 75.00 0.00 75.00 92.00 0.00 92.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 178.75 0.00 178.75 282.00 0.00 282.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 727.75 368.33 0.00 368.33 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 368.33 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 5003470414 01/08 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 200548 BOOKS 324,382.00 FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 569801 VENDOR 323310 - AZURIX NORTH AMERICA UNDERGROUND 20013299 01096.2 RETAINAGE 414 - 000000 - 205100.00000 0.00 200548 BOOKS 201545 THRU 11/30/01 RETAINAGE 20012650 20013299 01096.2 414- 263611. 763100.73050 0.00 200548 BOOKS 201545 THRU 11/30/01 20012650 20013299 01096.1 RETAINAGE 414 - 000000- 205100.00000 0.00 200548 BOOKS 201545 THRU 11/30/01 RETAINAGE 20012653 20013299 01096.1 414. 263611 - 763100.73050 0.00 200548 BOOKS 201545 THRU 11/30/01 20012650 CHECK NO 569501 VENDOR 129820 - B & W GOLF CARS, INC 20012856 007178 521. 122410. 646425 -00000 202705 PARTS 20012856 007166 521. 122410. 646425 -00000 202705 PARTS CHECK NO 569373 VENDOR 1740 BAKER & TAYLOR CO 20012662 5003470414 01/08 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 324,382.00 200548 BOOKS 324,382.00 20012650 5003464847 01/04 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 150,538.00 200548 BOOKS 150,538.00 20012653 5003476605 01/09 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 200548 BOOKS 0.00 20012650 5003464840 01/04 307 - 156110- 766100.00000 0.00 200548 BOOKS 0.00 20012650 5003464846 01/04 307. 156110 - 766100.00000 0.00 200548 BOOKS 0.00 20012653 5003458140 12/28 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 200548 BOOKS 0.00 20012650 5003473570 01/08 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 200548 BOOKS 20012653 2008604601 01/08 307 - 156110. 766100 -00000 200548 BOOKS 16J2AGE 15 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 32,438.20- 0.00 32,438.20- 324,382.00 0.00 324,382.00 15,053.80- 0.00 15,053.80- 150,538.00 0.00 150,538.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 427,428.00 0.00 93.08 0.00 93.08 0.00 69.88 0.00 69.88 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 162.96 0.00 1,076.61 0.00 1,076.61 0.00 129.63 0.00 129.63 0.00 305.45 0.00 305.45 0.00 132.15 0.00 132.15 0.00 540.31 0.00 540.31 0.00 1,028.79 0.00 1,028.79 0.00 791.78 0.00 791.78 0.00 371.32 0.00 371.32 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 16 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012650 5003464799 01/04 307 - 156110. 766100 -00000 0.00 1,830.43 0.00 1,830.43 200548 BOOKS 20012650 5003464845 01/04 307 - 156110. 766100 -00000 0.00 645.87 0.00 645.87 200548 BOOKS 20012662 5003472429 01/08 307 - 156110. 766100 -00000 0.00 92.16 0.00 92.16 200548 BOOKS 20012662 5003475586 01/08 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 1,165.84 0.00 1,165.84 200548 BOOKS 20012650 5003473571 01/08 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 128.01 0.00 128.01 200548 BOOKS 20012662 5003474868 01/08 307 - 156110. 766100 -00000 0.00 488.81 0.00 488.81 200548 BOOKS 20012650 5003464843 01/04 307 - 156110. 766100 -00000 0.00 691.44 0.00 691.44 200548 BOOKS 20012650 5003473575 01/08 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 104.53 0.00 104.53 200548 BOOKS 20012650 5003473572 01/08 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 78.40 0.00 78.40 200548 BOOKS 20012650 5003464842 01/04 307 - 156110 - 766100.00000 0.00 361.93 0.00 361.93 200548 BOOKS 20012662 5003475375 01/08 307. 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 469.86 0.00 469.86 200548 BOOKS 20012650 5003464841 01/04 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 174.87 0.00 174.87 200548 BOOKS 20012650 2008580909 01/04 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 18.94 0.00 18.94 200548 BOOKS 20012647 5003471552 01/08 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 114.23 0.00 114.23 200548 BOOKS 20012653 5003463967 01/02 307 - 156110. 766100 -00000 0.00 1,319.74 0.00 1,319.74 200548 BOOKS 20012647 5003475711 01/08 307 - 156110. 766100 -00000 0.00 117.86 0.00 117.86 200548 BOOKS 20012650 5003473573 01/08 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 105.56 0.00 105.56 200548 BOOKS Iq 6J2GE 17 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012650 5003464844 01/04 307. 156110- 766100 -00000 0.00 349.51 0.00 200548 BOOKS 20012650 5003473574 01/08 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 123.80 0.00 200548 BOOKS 20012650 5003473569 01/08 307 - 156110 - 766100 -00000 0.00 78.54 0.00 200548 BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569534 VENDOR 150030 - BARANY, SCHMITT & WEAVER 20013282 2285 355 - 156150- 631500 -33776 0.00 17,475.00 0.00 203536 12/1/01 TO 12/31/01 20013282 2217 355 - 156150 - 631500 -33776 0.00 2.868.75 0.00 203536 11 /1 /01 TO 11/30/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569661 VENDOR 251040 - BARNEY'S PUMPS INC. 20012981 949576 01/08 408 - 233352 - 655100 -00000 0.00 517.25 0.00 202415 NON BID ITEMS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569911 VENDOR 351280 BARRY WILLIAMS 20013272 1/15 TRVL B WILLIAMS 001 - 155910 - 640300 -00000 0.00 135.90 0.00 1/15 TRVL B WILLIAMS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569635 VENDOR 229220 BERKSHIRE VETERINARY HOSPITAL 20012850 01/28 01 -9050 C. VANDYNE 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 200929 C.VAN DYNE 01/28 20012850 01/28 01.9137 C. VANDYNE 610 - 155410. 631970.00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 200929 C.VAN DYNE 01/28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569374 VENDOR 1820 - BETTER BUSINESS FORMS 20012663 4031752 01/09 408 - 210151. 647110 -00000 0.00 2,308.50 0.00 202981 RETURN ENVELOPES FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 16JI GE ,8 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,308.50 CHECK NO 569375 VENDOR 1910 - BETTER ROADS, INC. 43,068.00 0.00 20011878 #9 333. 163650- 763100 -62031 0.00 175,074.98 0.00 103762 THRU 12/30/01 0.00 4,306.80- 0.00 20013283 #4 411 - 273511 - 763100 -70039 0.00 43,068.00 106825 THRU 1/6/02 20013283 #4 RETAINAGE 313 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 96,351.40- 106825 THRU 1/6/02 RETAINAGE 20012982 22492 12/31 408 - 253212 - 653130 -00000 0.00 60.89 201992 ASPHALT 20013283 #4 313 - 163673 - 763100 -60071 0.00 963,513.94 106825 THRU 1/6/02 20011878 #9 RETAINAGE 333 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 17,507.49- 103762 THRU 12/30/01 RETAINAGE 20013283 #4 RETAINAGE 411 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 4,306.80- 106825 THRU 1/6/02 RETAINAGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 175.074.98 0.00 43,068.00 0.00 96,351.40- 0.00 60.89 0.00 963,513.94 0.00 17,507.49- 0.00 4,306.80- 0.00 1.063,552.12 CHECK NO 569521 VENDOR 141230 - BIG CYPRESS ANIMAL CLINIC 20012859 02 -15195 0070520 01/08 001- 155410. 631980 -00000 0.00 190.00 0.00 190.00 153458 COMPREHENSIVE MEDEICAL CARE 20012858 01.9320 M. BYRNES 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 200932 01/25 ADOPTION FEE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 205.00 CHECK NO 569793 VENDOR 320050 - BIGCHALK.COM, INC. 20013058 STDINV00008526 01/08 355 - 156190. 654380 -00000 0.00 7,250.00 0.00 7,250.00 204008 DATA BASE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7,250.00 CHECK NO 569791 VENDOR 319580 - BILLY BOY CARRYOUT, INC. - - -- -C/O 20012561 NOV 2001 OVERPAY 001 - 155810 - 644100 -00000 0.00 141.39- 0.00 141.39 - NOV 2001 OVERPAY 202988 20012561 DEC 2001 OVERPAY 001 - 155810 - 644100 -00000 0.00 141.39- 0.00 141.39 - DEC 2001 OVERPAY 202988 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012561 JAN 2002 OVERPAY JAN 2002 OVERPAY 2020988 20012561 OCT 2001 OVERPAY OCT 2001 OVERPAY 202988 20012561 FEB 2002 FEB 2002 202988 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 155810 - 644100 -00000 0.00 001- 155810 - 644100 -00000 0.00 001 - 155810 - 644100 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569545 VENDOR 159870 - BLUELINE INC. 20012682 10148713 11/02 113 - 138931- 651110 -00000 202515 SUPPLIES CHECK NO 569376 VENDOR 2310 - BOB DEAN SUPPLY, INC. 20012667 894371 01/15 408 - 233312 - 655100.00000 141.39- 152148 FREIGHT CREDIT 868.60 20012667 894391 01/18 408- 233312 - 655100 -00000 0.00 152148 FREIGHT CREDIT 2.29- 20012992 DISCOUNT 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 228.43 200842 DISCOUNT 0.00 20012992 896803 1,016.13 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 1,016.13 200842 PARTS 0.00 20012667 894391 01 /10 408 - 233312. 655100 -00000 1,666.94 152148 SUPPLIES FOR OPERATIONS 0.00 20012667 894371 01 /10 408 - 233312- 655100 -00000 95.17 152148 SUPPLIES FOR OPERATIONS 20012670 894100 1/9 408 - 233351 - 655200 -00000 MOTORS FOR ODOR CONTROL UNITS CHECK NO 569566 VENDOR 168720 - BONITA AUTO SUPPLY /NAPA 20012857 568592 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 203458 PARTS 20012857 569220 521. 122410- 646425.00000 203458 PARTS 16JIGE 19 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 141.39- 0.00 141.39- 141.39- 0.00 141.39- 868.60 0.00 868.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 303.04 0.00 111.68 0.00 111.68 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 111.68 0.00 508.07- 0.00 508.07- 0.00 30.82- 0.00 30.82- 0.00 2.29- 0.00 2.29- 0.00 228.43 0.00 228.43 0.00 515.56 0.00 515.56 0.00 1,016.13 0.00 1,016.13 0.00 448.00 0.00 448.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,666.94 0.00 21.49 0.00 21.49 0.00 95.17 0.00 95.17 CHECK NO 569854 VENDOR 341690 - BRITT E. HIRST FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2 AGE 20 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012857 569233 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 5.06 0.00 5.06 203458 PARTS 20012857 569467 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 25.87 0.00 25.87 203458 PARTS 20012857 568991 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 17.02 0.00 17.02 203458 PARTS 20012857 569242 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 69.44 0.00 69.44 203458 PARTS 20012857 570575 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 40.85 0.00 40.85 203458 PARTS 20012857 569490 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 161.38 0.00 161.38 203458 PARTS 20012857 565589 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 17.12 0.00 17.12 203458 PARTS 20012857 570614 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 179.88 0.00 179.88 203458 PARTS 20012857 569517 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 115.37 0.00 115.37 203458 PARTS 20012857 569234 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 40.20 0.00 40.20 203458 PARTS 20012857 570458 521- 122410. 646425.00000 0.00 18.40 0.00 18.40 203458 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 807.25 CHECK NO 569752 VENDOR 293380 BQ CONCRETE 20012664 1161 01/05 301 - 120435 - 763100 -80525 0.00 1,250.00 0.00 1,250.00 204063 STRIPPING FOR PEDESTRIN CXING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,250.00 CHECK NO 569904 VENDOR 350900 - BRIAN J. BARNES, P.E. 20012665 MEMBERSHIP FEES E. KANT 101 - 163610 - 654210 -00000 0.00 150.00 0.00 150.00 MEMBERSHIP FEES E. KANT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.00 CHECK NO 569854 VENDOR 341690 - BRITT E. HIRST Iq 6Jl GE 21 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012648 PRESCHOOL 1/21- 1/31/02 111 - 156390 - 634999.00000 0.00 232.50 0.00 PRESCHOOL 1/21- 1/31/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569377 VENDOR 2560 - BROWN VETERINARY CLINIC 20012851 01/25 02 -9566 D. LEVI 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 200938 01/25 D. LEVI 20012851 01/25 02 -9547 J. DOUCET 610 - 155410- 631970 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 200938 01/25 J. DOUCET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569846 VENDOR 338610 BURNS VETERINARY SUPPLY 20012671 5330333 1 /10 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 225.67 0.00 VETUS HEXASCRUB CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569592 VENDOR 186290 BWI /BOOK WHOLESALERS, INC. 20012983 1213179 01/08 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 69.31 0.00 200562 CHILDRENS TITLES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569636 VENDOR 230790 - C.E.D. INC. 20012791 4977 - 319443 778 - 182701- 652990 -00000 0.00 117.56 0.00 200081 EL.PARTS 20012782 4977 - 357255 778. 182701 - 652990.00000 0.00 92.86 0.00 200081 EL.SUPPLIES 20012783 4977 - 357115 778 - 182701- 652990.00000 0.00 634.86 0.00 200081 EL.SUPPLIES 20012792 4977 - 318732 778 - 182701. 652990 -00000 0.00 22.70 0.00 200081 EL.SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569490 VENDOR 117000 - CAPRI LANDSCAPING & LAWN SERVICE 20012794 077822 111 - 163647 - 634999 -00000 0.00 41.00 0.00 200366 SUPPL. CHECK NO 569845 VENDOR 338350 - CAROLINA SOFTWARE FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 22 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012794 077821 111 - 163647. 634999 -00000 0.00 52.74 0.00 52.74 200366 SUPPL. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 93.74 CHECK NO 569378 VENDOR 2860 - CAPRI LAWN & GARDEN EQUIP 20012795 077907 001. 172930- 652990 -00000 0.00 3.70 0.00 3.70 200467 SUPPL. 20012772 077886 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 28.50 0.00 28.50 200616 PARTS 20012772 077889 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 562.50 0.00 562.50 200616 PARTS 20012808 077815 001 - 156363 - 652910 -00000 0.00 104.63 0.00 104.63 152610 TRAILER HITCH 20012795 078053 001 - 172930 - 652990 -00000 0.00 140.64 0.00 140.64 200467 SUPPL. 20012772 78116 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 47.12 0.00 47.12 200616 PARTS 20012772 078102 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 70.68 0.00 70.68 200616 PARTS 20012772 78066 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 33.97 0.00 33.97 200616 PARTS 20012772 77780 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 443.30 0.00 443.30 200616 PARTS 20012772 078115 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 99.16 0.00 99.16 200616 PARTS 20012772 77776 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 44.34 0.00 44.34 200616 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,578.54 CHECK NO 569602 VENDOR 193540 CARIBBEAN LAWN SERVICE 20012797 3468 141 - 112555 - 634999 -00000 0.00 500.00 0.00 500.00 200498 ROADSIDE MOWING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 500.00 CHECK NO 569845 VENDOR 338350 - CAROLINA SOFTWARE Iq 6J2AGE 23 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012799 19426 470 - 173435 - 634999 -00000 0.00 450.00 0.00 204002 SUPPORT & MAINT. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569895 VENDOR 350280 - CAROLYNE COLE 20012412 TRAVEL 1/11 -25/02 COLE 198 - 157440 - 640200.00000 0.00 99.76 0.00 C COLE 1/11 -25/02 TRAVEL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569491 VENDOR 117060 - CAT CARE CLINIC 20013118 D HANSON 01 -9134 610 - 155410. 631970.00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 200940 D HANSON 01.9134 20013118 S LOEFFLER 01 -8626 610 - 155410. 631970 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 200940 S LOEFFLER 01 -8626 20013118 T CHURCH 01 -8506 610 - 155410. 631970.00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 200940 T CHURCH 01.8506 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569907 VENDOR 351100 - CATHEDRAL HILL HOTEL 20013271 Q5IE6 G YILMAX 3/2.7 470 - 173410 - 640300.00000 0.00 735.30 0.00 152995 G YILMAZ 3/2.7 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569833 VENDOR 334310 - CDWG GOVERNMENT, INC. 20012840 EW20354 001. 121143 - 654370 -00000 0.00 783.73 0.00 202984 SUPPLIES 20013329 EW09376 001- 122240 - 651910 -00000 0.00 311.99 0.00 151172 JET DIRECT 5005 PRINT SRVR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569748 VENDOR 291140 CENTER POINT PUBLISHING 20012798 253175 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 68.88 0.00 201752 TITLES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569664 VENDOR 254690 CENTURY RAIN AID 6Jl GE 24 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012861 679186 -2 111- 163646 - 646311 -00000 0.00 208.44 0.00 153285 PARTS FOR SPRINKLER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569621 VENDOR 212530 CHALET OF SAN MARCO 20012562 FEB 2002 188 - 140480- 644600 -00000 0.00 1,475.88 0.00 FEB 2002 201345 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569542 VENDOR 158370 CHARLES RICE 30012595 1/21 -22 TRVL C RICE 681 - 431310 - 640200.00000 0.00 21.00 0.00 1/21 -22 TRVL C RICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569509 VENDOR 133880 CHECKPOINT 20012804 55283 001 - 122240 - 634999 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 152718 LABOR GOLDEN GATE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569557 VENDOR 165950 - CHECKPOINT, LTD. 20012862 175777 001 - 122240. 646281 -00000 0.00 877.50 0.00 202346 ALARM MONITORING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569912 VENDOR 351290 - CHERYL A. BOLTZ 20013273 12/22 -1/29 TRVL C BOLTZ 001 - 156130 - 640200 -00000 0.00 160.08 0.00 12/22 -1/29 TRVL C BOLTZ CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569379 VENDOR 3190 CHEVRON 20012793 789 - 869 -275 -6 DEC /01 521 - 122450. 652410 -00000 0.00 74.89 0.00 200617 DEC /01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569519 VENDOR 140340 CHEVRON USA 20012788 1953572 001 - 144510- 652410 -00000 0.00 235.10 0.00 153409 FUEL FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 2AGE 25 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 235.10 CHECK NO 569855 VENDOR 341860 - CHRISTINE GOMEZ 20013320 GOMEZ TUITION REIMB 8/01 490. 144610. 654310 -00000 0.00 660.85 0.00 660.85 GOMEZ TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 8/01 20013320 GOMEZ TUITION REIMB 8/01 490 - 144610. 654310 -00000 0.00 278.30 0.00 278.30 GOMEZ TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 8/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 939.15 CHECK NO 569796 VENDOR 321610 CHRISTINE STYLES 20012849 JAllERCISE 111 - 156380 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,765.72 0.00 1,765.72 201017 1/1 -24 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,765.72 CHECK NO 569789 VENDOR 317320 CITY MATTRESS 20012796 61196995 490 - 144610 - 652990 -00000 0.00 440.00 0.00 440.00 203589 MATTRESS SET 20012796 61197005 490 - 144610. 652990 -00000 0.00 440.00 0.00 440.00 203589 MATTRESS SET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 880.00 CHECK NO 569380 VENDOR 3360 CITY OF EVERGLADES 20012786 313 12/25/01 001 - 061010. 643400 -00000 0.00 23.80 0.00 23.80 313 12/25 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 23.80 CHECK NO 569381 VENDOR 3390 CITY OF NAPLES 20013130 3227 195 - 110406 - 881300.10260 0.00 4,680.00 0.00 4,680.00 102053 T GROINS PROJ CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,680.00 CHECK NO 569567 VENDOR 168900 CITY OF NAPLES 20013113 LOCKBOX WE 1/18/02 408. 000000 - 208750 -00000 0.00 42,118.98 408 - 000000 - 208751 -00000 0.00 10,357.54 408 - 000000- 208764 -00000 0.00 26.57 0.00 52.503.09 LOCKBOX WE 1/18/02 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J I GE 26 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013114 COLLECTIONS W/E 211102 408 - 000000 - 208750 -00000 0.00 7,185.85 408- 000000- 208751 -00000 0.00 1,599.97 408 - 000000 - 208764 -00000 0.00 463.07 0.00 9,248.89 COLLECTIONS W/E 2/1/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 61,751.98 CHECK NO 569640 VENDOR 232440 - CITY OF NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY 20012567 FEB 2002 COLL13 001 - 061010.644100 -00000 0.00 555.17 0.00 555.17 FEB 2002 202095 20012568 FEB 2002 COLL13 001 - 061010 - 644100 -00000 0.00 285.01 0.00 285.01 FEB 2002 202096 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 840.18 CHECK NO 569351 VENDOR 166520 CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 20012779 J.ALVARADO 00.1399 338 - 163650 - 761100 -63041 0.00 1,995.00 0.00 1,995.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,995.00 CHECK NO 569350 VENDOR 166520 CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 20012778 J.ALVARADO 00 -1399 313 - 163673 - 761100 -63041 0.00 1,263.50 0.00 1,263.50 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,263.50 CHECK NO 569349 VENDOR 166520 CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 20012711 REIMB J JACKSON AIRFARE 301. 121125 - 640300 -01017 0.00 456.00 0.00 456.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 456.00 CHECK NO 569564 VENDOR 166520 - CLERK OF COURTS, DWIGHT E. BROCK 20012911 2612058 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 200986 2612058 COPIES 20012911 2615651 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 200986 2615651 COPIES 20012911 2630299 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 200986 2630299 COPIES 20012911 2612063 001 - 443010- 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 200986 2612063 COPIES FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 2iAGE 27 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012911 2629833 001. 443010. 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 200986 2629833 COPIES 20012911 2623556 001 - 443010- 651210.00000 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 200986 2623556 COPIES 20012911 2626493 001 - 443010. 651210 -00000 0.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 200986 2626493 COPIES 20012911 2623560 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 200986 2623560 COPIES 20012911 2610133 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 200986 2610133 COPIES 20012911 2628256 001 - 443010- 651210.00000 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 200986 2628256 COPIES 20012911 2626499 001 - 443010. 651210 -00000 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 200986 2626499 COPIES 20012911 2628255 001 - 443010 - 651210.00000 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 200986 2628255 COPIES 20012911 2623564 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 200986 2623564 COPIES 20012911 2612055 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 200986 2612055 COPIES 20012911 2629831 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 200986 2629831 COPIES 20012911 2626491 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 200986 2626491 COPIES 20012911 2612065 001 - 443010. 651210.00000 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 200986 2612065 COPIES 20012911 2629826 001 - 443010. 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 200986 2629826 COPIES 20012911 2612057 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 200986 2612057 COPIES 20012911 2629829 001. 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 200986 2629829 COPIES 20012911 2614119 001. 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 200986 2614119 COPIES FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 2GE 28 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012911 2616747 001 - 443010 - 651210.00000 0.00 7.00 0.00 7.00 200986 2616747 COPIES 20012911 2612060 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 200986 2612060 COPIES 20012911 2607547 001 - 443010. 651210 -00000 0.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 200986 2607547 COPIES 20012911 2617687 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 200986 2617687 COPIES 20012911 2607965 001 - 443010. 651210.00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 200986 2607965 COPIES 20012911 2621707 001 - 443010. 651210.00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 200986 2621707 COPIES 20012911 2607966 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 200986 2607966 COPIES 20012911 2612062 001. 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 200986 2612062 COPIES 20012911 2613778 001 - 443010. 651210.00000 0.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 200986 2613778 COPIES 20012911 2629827 001- 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 200986 2629827 COPIES 20012911 2630298 001- 443010. 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 200986 2630298 COPIES 20012911 2623562 001 - 443010. 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 200986 2623562 COPIES 20012911 2605870 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 200986 2605870 COPIES 20012911 2623563 001. 443010. 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 200986 2623563 COPIES 20012911 2630300 001 - 443010 - 651210.00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 200986 2630300 COPIES 20012911 2629825 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 200986 2629825 COPIES 20012911 2623558 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 200986 2623558 COPIES FEBRUARY 06, 2002 569767 VENDOR 305220 - CLEVELAND COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 T.BACHELOR 12121101 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 4.00 153376 T.BACHELOR 12/21/01 4.00 20012785 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 1.00 153376 C.CORRAL 12/27/01 4.00 FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 20012911 2607963 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 200986 2607963 COPIES 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 20012911 2607962 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 200986 2607962 COPIES 20012911 2608698 001. 443010- 651210.00000 0.00 200986 2608698 COPIES 20012911 2624727 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 200986 2624727 COPIES 20013328 R GOWER 00 -1396 PARCEL231 313 - 163673 - 761100 -63041 0.00 152341 R GOWER 00 -1396 PARCEL 231 20012911 2607946 001 - 443010 - 651210 -00000 0.00 200986 2607946 COPIES 20012911 2615655 001- 443010. 651210 -00000 0.00 200986 2615655 COPIES CHECK NO 569767 VENDOR 305220 - CLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA 20012785 T.BACHELOR 12121101 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 4.00 153376 T.BACHELOR 12/21/01 4.00 20012785 C.CORRAL 12/27/01 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 1.00 153376 C.CORRAL 12/27/01 4.00 20012785 T.BACHELOR 12/31/01 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 153376 T.BACHELOR 12/31/01 20012785 T.BACHELOR 12/31/01 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 153376 T.BACHELOR 12/31/01 20012785 T.BACHELOR 12121101 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 153376 T.BACHELOR 12/21/01 CHECK NO 569849 VENDOR 339200 - CLEVELAND CLINIC FLORIDA 20013115 J AMADY 10/5 001 - 155930 - 634112 -00000 204112 J AMADY 10/5 CHECK NO 569518 VENDOR 140160 - CMS CHILD PROTECTION TEAM 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16J2GE _9 AMT NET VCHR DISC 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 400.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 224.90 0.00 26.65 0.00 42.25 0.00 31.85 0.00 224.90 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 7,334.88 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 2.00 2.00 4.00 4.00 400.00 1.00 4.00 512.00 224.90 26.65 42.25 31.85 224.90 550.55 7,334.88 7.334.88 CHECK NO 569345 VENDOR 3600 - COLLIER COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 20013341 REG ARMSTRONG /ALLEN /COLLI 001- 010510- 654360 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 45.00 CHECK NO 569827 VENDOR 332890 - COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 2 GE 30 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013330 73802 001- 155930. 634156 -00000 0.00 2,083.16 0.00 2,083.16 201846 REIMB REQUEST CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,083.16 CHECK NO 569588 VENDOR 182370 - COASTAL APPRAISAL SERVICES 20012780 29327 333 - 163650 - 631600 -60071 0.00 708.75 0.00 708.75 6330 PROF SUS 12/14. 12/19/01 20012780 29332 333. 163650- 631600 -60071 0.00 472.50 0.00 472.50 6330 PROF.SVS 10/31. 12/7/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,181.25 CHECK NO 569616 VENDOR 205190 - COLLIER ANESTHESIA P.A. 20012776 J.VEENSCHOTEN 10/14,10/15 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 260.00 0.00 260.00 201847 J.VEENSCHOTEN 10/14,10/15/01 20012776 S.RILEY 5/17/01 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 351.00 0.00 351.00 201847 S.RILEY 5/17/01 20012776 C.FREDERICK 12/4/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 2,223.00 0.00 2,223.00 201847 C.FREDERICK 12/4/01 20012776 D.CORONA 8/30 11/23/01 001 - 155930. 631210.00000 0.00 951.60 0.00 951.60 201847 D.CORONA 8/30,11/23/01 20012776 M.CALANA 12/28/01 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 273.00 0.00 273.00 201847 M.CALANA 12/28/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,058.60 CHECK NO 569594 VENDOR 187320 - COLLIER CAT HOSPITAL 20013117 S GIBBS 01 -9100 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 200957 S GIBBS 01 -9100 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.00 CHECK NO 569345 VENDOR 3600 - COLLIER COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION 20013341 REG ARMSTRONG /ALLEN /COLLI 001- 010510- 654360 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 45.00 CHECK NO 569827 VENDOR 332890 - COLLIER COUNTY CLERK OF COURTS, FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 2 GE 31 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012801 0777 111 - 156332. 649035 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 152306 CITATION FALSE ALARM 20012800 0848 111 - 156332. 649035.00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 153174 CITATION FALSE ALARM 20012801 0541 001 - 156363. 649035 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 152306 CITATION FALSE ALARM 20012801 0630 111 - 156334. 649035 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 152306 CITATION FALSE ALARM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 300.00 CHECK NO 569356 VENDOR 218570 - COLLIER COUNTY OVERALL EXTENSION 20013054 REGIST H CASELTINE 2112 001 - 138710. 654360 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20.00 CHECK NO 569504 VENDOR 130700 - COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT 20013296 99- 0942 -CFA CCSO MAKOWSKI 001 - 431510. 351100 -00000 0.00 604.34 0.00 604.34 99- 0942 -CFA CCSO MAKOWSKI 20013296 01- 6154 -MMA CCSO BRYAN 001. 431510. 351100 -00000 0.00 152.10 0.00 152.10 01- 6154 -MMA CCSO BRYAN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 756.44 CHECK NO 569347 VENDOR 8050 COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 20013340 20020106 111 - 156332 - 649010 -00000 0.00 21.60 0.00 21.60 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 21.60 CHECK NO 569346 VENDOR 8050 COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR 20013295 20020063 TAGS & TITLE 408. 253212- 649010 -00000 0.00 52.85 0.00 52.85 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 52.85 CHECK NO 569383 VENDOR 3690 COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY BILLING 20012802 04800002700 12/7- 1/10/02 111 - 156332 - 643400 -00000 0.00 60.15 0.00 60.15 04800002700 12/7- 1/10/02 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J ZGE 32 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012789 05101636000 12/11- 1/14/02 111 - 163646 - 643400 -00000 0.00 117.38 0.00 117.38 05101636000 12/11- 1/14/02 20012848 05108341500 12/11 -1 /11 408 - 233312 - 643400 -00000 0.00 1,186.00 0.00 1,186.00 05108341500 12/11 -1 /11 20012789 02702201500 11/28 -12/28 111 - 163646 - 643400 -00000 0.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 02702201500 11/28 - 12/28/01 20012844 05418830500 10/12 -11/14 001 - 155410 - 643400 -00000 0.00 710.48 0.00 710.48 05418830500 10/12 -11/14 20012790 04500046000 12/5- 1/8/02 408. 233351 - 643400 -00000 0.00 25.44 0.00 25.44 04500046000 12/5- 1/8/02 20012781 03603211900 11/30- 113/02 111 - 163646 - 643400 -00000 0.00 1,697.06 0.00 1,697.06 03603211900 11/30- 1/3/02 20012790 04817635000 12/7- 1/11/02 408 - 233351 - 643400 -00000 0.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 04817635000 12/7- 1/11/02 20012847 02033620900 12/13 -1/14 470 - 173431 - 643400 -00000 0.00 1,064.18 0.00 1,064.18 02033620900 12/13 -1/14 20012787 06102553000 11/16 - 12/1801 001 - 061010 - 643400 -00000 0.00 48.02 0.00 48.02 06102553000 11/16- 12/18/01 20013128 05418830500 12/13 -1/15 001 - 155410 - 643400 -00000 0.00 836.30 0.00 836.30 05418830500 12/13 -1/15 20012787 06102727101 11/16 - 12/18/0 001- 061010 - 643400 -00000 0.00 67.32 0.00 67.32 0610272710 11/16 - 12/18/01 20012846 05404171300 12/12 -1/15 111 - 156313 - 643400 -00000 0.00 1,480.60 0.00 1,480.60 05404171300 12/12 -1/15 20012789 04305557801 12/4- 1/7/02 111. 163646 - 643400 -00000 0.00 89.00 0.00 89.00 04305557801 12/4- 1/7/02 20012790 04614614700 12/6- 1/9/02 408 - 233351 - 643400 -00000 0.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 04614614700 12/6- 1/9/02 20012789 04809876801 12/7- 1/10/02 111 - 163646 - 643400 -00000 0.00 69.00 0.00 69.00 04809876801 12/7- 1/10/02 20012790 04717634900 12/6- 1/8/02 408- 233351 - 643400 -00000 0.00 18.09 0.00 18.09 04717634900 12/6- 1/8/02 20012802 05400738300 12/12- 1/15/02 111. 156332 - 643400 -00000 0.00 69.00 0.00 69.00 05400738300 12/12- 1/15/02 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012789 05104076500 12/11- 1/14/02 05104076500 12/11- 1/14/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111. 163646 - 643400 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569548 VENDOR 160760 - COLLIER EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS 20012775 R.GARCIA 12/17/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 201848 R.GARCIA 12/17/01 0.00 20012775 L.SYBERT 12/17/01 001 - 155930. 631210.00000 0.00 201848 L.SYBERT 12/17/01 0.00 20012775 J.KEARNS 11/25/01 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 201848 J.KEARNS 11/25/01 0.00 20012775 B.DRILICH 9/20/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 201848 B.DRILICH 9/20/01 0.00 20012775 M.AIME 11/26/01 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 201848 M.AIME 11/26/01 0.00 20012775 R.GARCIA 10/15/01 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 201848 R.GARCIA 10/15/01 0.00 20012775 A.HAMPSON 10/14/01 001 - 155930- 631210.00000 0.00 201848 A.HAMPSON 10/14/01 20012775 R.ANDRIS 10112101 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 201848 R.ANDRIS 10112101 0.00 20012775 R.GARCIA 9/9/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 201848 R.GARCIA 9/9/01 20012775 C.CAREAGA 10/15/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 201848 C.CAREAGA 10/15/01 20012775 Y.GARCIA 11/26/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 201848 Y.GARCIA 11/26/01 CHECK NO 569816 VENDOR 329210 - COLLIER NEUROLOGIC NEUROLOGY 20012784 G.COPPERSMITH 12/27/01 001- 155930. 631210 -00000 153387 G.COPPERSMITH 12/27/01 CHECK NO 569749 VENDOR 291770 - COLLIER NEUROLOGIC SPECIALISTS 16JIGE AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 82.87 0.00 82.87 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 7,668.89 0.00 102.05 0.00 102.05 0.00 158.60 0.00 158.60 0.00 183.30 0.00 183.30 0.00 158.60 0.00 158.60 0.00 158.60 0.00 158.60 0.00 158.60 0.00 158.60 0.00 158.60 0.00 158.60 0.00 102.05 0.00 102.05 0.00 102.05 0.00 102.05 0.00 158.60 0.00 158.60 0.00 158.60 0.00 158.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,599.65 0.00 104.00 0.00 104.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 104.00 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 2AGE 34 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012845 C DAVIS 12/21 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 48.75 0.00 48.75 201850 C DAVIS 12121 20012845 L CROSBY 1/3 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 325.00 0.00 325.00 201850 L CROSBY 1/3 20012845 J BALZARANO 12/31 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 146.25 0.00 146.25 201850 J BALARANZO 12/31 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 520.00 CHECK NO 569717 VENDOR 278490 - COLLIER SPORTS OFFICIALS ASSOC. INC 20012842 NOV 2001 GAMES 130. 157710- 634999 -00000 0.00 533.00 0.00 533.00 202014 NOV 2001 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 533.00 CHECK NO 569533 VENDOR 150010 - COLLIER SURGICAL CENTER 20012910 A GUREGHIAN 12/10/01 001 - 155930. 634101 -00000 0.00 1,873.67 0.00 1,873.67 204113 A GUREGHIAN 12/10/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,873.67 CHECK NO 569633 VENDOR 227020 - COLLIER TIRE & AUTO REPAIR 20012835 73931 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 31.75 0.00 31.75 200621 TIRE SERVICE 20012834 74014 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 604.14 0.00 604.14 200623 TIRE SERVICE 20012834 74011 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 52.14 0.00 52.14 200623 TIRE SERVICE 20012834 74143 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 269.40 0.00 269.40 200623 TIRE SERVICE 20012835 73958 521. 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 31.75 0.00 31.75 200621 TIRE SERVICE 20012835 73930 521. 122410- 646415 -00000 0.00 31.75 0.00 31.75 200621 TIRE SERVICE 20012835 74010 521. 122410- 646415 -00000 0.00 50.50 0.00 50.50 200621 TIRE SERVICE 20012835 74100 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 9.90 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 54.90 200621 TIRE SERVICE FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 35 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012835 74067 521.122410. 646415 -00000 0.00 31.75 0.00 31.75 200621 TIRE SERVICE 20012834 74104 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 578.97 0.00 578.97 200623 TIRE SERVICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,737.05 CHECK NO 569643 VENDOR 235530 - COLOR TEC COPY CENTER 20012837 5111 111 - 156341 - 651210 -00000 0.00 219.00 0.00 219.00 202194 COPIES 20012838 5244 408 - 233313 - 647110 -00000 0.00 41.92 0.00 41.92 200645 COPIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 260.92 CHECK NO 569806 VENDOR 326240 COLOR -TECH COPY CENTER 20012839 5243 470 - 173410 - 647110 -00000 0.00 235.69 0.00 235.69 201217 COPIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 235.69 CHECK NO 569829 VENDOR 333480 COMCAST 20012580 FEB 2002 FIBER LEASE 001 - 121143 - 641400.00000 0.00 200.00 0.00 200.00 FEB 2002 201982 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 200.00 CHECK NO 569485 VENDOR 115280 COMMERCIAL LAND MAINTENANCE 20012803 994939 198.157440.646314 -00000 0.00 433.89 0.00 433.89 152786 TREE REMOVAL /ROBERT RANCH 20012843 994901 136. 162590 - 634999 -00000 0.00 520.00 0.00 520.00 203681 INSTALL 20012833 994804 111. 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 550.00 0.00 550.00 203678 REPAIRS 20012833 994912 111. 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 105.00 0.00 105.00 203678 REPAIRS 20012833 994902 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 130.00 0.00 130.00 203678 REPAIRS 20012833 994733 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 517.57 0.00 517.57 203678 REPAIRS FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 36 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012833 994903 111- 163646- 634999.00000 0.00 390.00 0.00 390.00 203678 REPAIRS 20012832 995051 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 3.045.00 0.00 3,045.00 200446 MOWING 20012833 994911 111 - 163646 - 634999 -00000 0.00 576.00 0.00 576.00 203678 REPAIRS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,267.46 CHECK NO 569686 VENDOR 263070 COMMUNICATIONS INTERNATIONAL 20012807 426300 521 - 122410. 646610 -00000 0.00 24.30 0.00 24.30 153216 METAL CLIP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 24.30 CHECK NO 569364 VENDOR 287310 COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERS 20013351 02/02 ACCESS FEES 517. 121640 - 631153 -00000 0.00 4,025.25 0.00 4,025.25 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,025.25 CHECK NO 569619 VENDOR 211440 COMPAQ COMPUTER CORP. 20012777 260018902 408.210151- 646910.00000 0.00 1,356.50 0.00 1,356.50 201098 MAINT. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.356.50 CHECK NO 569384 VENDOR 4060 CONGRESSIONAL QUARTERLY INC 20012809 208299 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 130.18 0.00 130.18 153194 WASH INFO DIR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 130.18 CHECK NO 569655 VENDOR 246200 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS 20012841 684134 313 - 163673. 763100 -66066 0.00 846.00 0.00 846.00 201978 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 846.00 CHECK NO 569539 VENDOR 156660 COPY CONCEPTS 20012806 NA1988 408 - 210151 - 634999 -00000 0.00 525.00 0.00 525.00 153345 SVS AGREEMENT FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 16J2AGE •- AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 525.00 CHECK NO 569713 VENDOR 276650 CORPORATE EXPRESS 20013123 29006368 191 - 138785 - 651110.33752 0.00 30.05 0.00 30.05 203450 SUPPLIES 20012817 28844081 517 - 121640 - 651110 -00000 0.00 68.89 0.00 68.89 203290 SUPPLIES 20012824 28968808 001 - 121710 - 651110 -00000 0.00 18.00 0.00 18.00 203334 SUPPLIES 20012826 28695858 001. 138710 - 651110.00000 0.00 16.61 0.00 16.61 203371 SUPPLIES 20012821 28931768 101- 163612 - 651110 -00000 0.00 15.71 0.00 15.71 203298 SUPPLIES 20013126 29057385 111 - 178980. 651110 -00000 0.00 151.41 0.00 151.41 203546 SUPPLIES 20013119 28695903 130 - 157710 - 651110 -00000 0.00 112.76 0.00 112.76 203438 SUPPLIES 2QO12827 28864564 408.210155- 651110 -00000 0.00 39.49- 0.00 39.49- 203344 SUPPLIES 20012829 28871170 470 - 173410 - 651110 -00000 0.00 153.99 0.00 153.99 203388 SUPPLIES 20012828 28844062 113 - 138930 - 651110 -00000 0.00 93.54 0.00 93.54 203347 SUPPLIES 20012818 28931844 001- 155110. 651110 -00000 0.00 150.36 0.00 150.36 203294 SUPPLIES 20012827 28931806 408 - 210155 - 651110 -00000 0.00 9.74 0.00 9.74 203344 SUPPLIES 20013127 28844082 111 - 163647- 651110 -00000 0.00 19.85 0.00 19.85 203724 SUPPLIES 20013122 28931852 113 - 138312 - 651110 -00000 0.00 1.04 0.00 1.04 203449 SUPPLIES 20012830 29006440 101 - 163620 - 651110 -00000 0.00 24.90 0.00 24.90 203406 SUPPLIES 20012820 28871185 473. 173413 - 651110 -00000 0.00 16.55 0.00 16.55 203296 SUPPLIES CHECK NO 569857 VENDOR 342490 - CORPORATE EXPRESS FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 d J 2AGE 38 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012831 28844104 001 - 122310 - 651110 -00000 0.00 41.25 0.00 41.25 203426 SUPLLIES 20013124 28390336 101 - 163609 - 651110 -00000 0.00 110.42 313 - 163611. 651110 -00000 0.00 79.02 0.00 189.44 203507 SUPPLIES 20012823 28844250 408- 210120. 651110 -00000 0.00 348.01 0.00 348.01 203332 SUPPLIES 20013124 28931837 101 - 163609 - 651110 -00000 0.00 13.20 313 - 163611 - 651110 -00000 0.00 13.83 0.00 27.03 203507 SUPPLIES 20013127 28871171 111 - 163647. 651110.00000 0.00 18.13 0.00 18.13 203724 SUPPLIES 20013121 28844197 111- 156349. 651110 -00000 0.00 16.18 0.00 16.18 203696 SUPPLIES 20012819 28931769 001 - 121810 - 651110 -00000 0.00 9.45 0.00 9.45 203314 SUPPLIES 20012829 28844048 470 - 173410 - 651110 -00000 0.00 27.32 0.00 27.32 203388 SUPPLIES 20013123 28871179 191 - 138785 - 651110 -33752 0.00 82.34 0.00 82.34 203450 SUPPLIES 20012830 28871177 101 - 163620 - 651110 -00000 0.00 4.20 0.00 4.20 203406 SUPPLIES 20012819 28871169 001 - 121810 - 651110 -00000 0.00 22.93 0.00 22.93 203314 SUPPLIES 20012822 28931856 408 - 253212 - 651110 -00000 0.00 21.72 0.00 21.72 203322 SUPPLIES 20012818 29057186 001 - 155110- 651110.00000 0.00 243.18 0.00 243.18 203294 SUPPLIES 20013120 29006107 408 - 233351 - 651110 -00000 0.00 84.21 0.00 84.21 203440 SUPPLIES 20012825 28871168 495 - 192310 - 651110 -00000 0.00 35.94 0.00 35.94 203373 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,015.24 CHECK NO 569857 VENDOR 342490 - CORPORATE EXPRESS FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20013125 28870685 203530 SUPPLIES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 6 111 GE 39 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 198 - 157440 - 651110 -00000 0.00 39.90 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569741 VENDOR 288320 - CPOC REALTY, L.L.C. 20012584 FEB 2002 1906 7 CU 113 - 138900 - 646360 -00000 0.00 159.12 FEB 2002 200085 20012565 2/02 RENT HUI 1905 145 CU 001 - 138710. 644100 -00000 0.00 1,788.34 194 - 101540. 644100 -00000 0.00 357.66 191 - 138785. 644100 -33751 0.00 1,073.00 121 - 138755. 644100 -33024 0.00 357.67 FEB 2002 201180 20012581 FEB 02 1902 800 CU LIBRAR 355 - 156175 - 644100 -80259 0.00 1,204.75 FEB 2002 200140 20012582 2/02 UTIL /FRAN 1905 210CU 669. 100220- 644100 -00000 0.00 2,153.33 FEB 2002 203044 20012585 FEB 2002 1906 17 CU 113. 138900- 646360 -00000 0.00 303.94 FEB 2002 200087 CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 569743 VENDOR 288680 - CPOC REALTY, LLC 20012583 FEB 2002 1902 200 CU 001 - 061010- 644100 -00000 0.00 2,933.33 FEB 2002 201952 20012559 2102 1902 400 CU 001. 071010- 644100 -00000 0.00 3,870.45 FEB 2002 201932 CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 569762 VENDOR 300830 - CRC INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING CORP 20012805 HUI5024 113 - 138312. 651110 -00000 0.00 150872 ADDRESS LABELS CHECK NO 569771 VENDOR 308630 - CREEL TRACTOR, CO. 20012836 179955 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 200854 PARTS 216.00 CHECK TOTAL 32.54 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 39.90 39.90 159.12 3,576.67 1.204.75 2,153.33 303.94 7,397.81 2,933.33 3,870.45 6,803.78 216.00 216.00 32.54 32.54 6J2AGE 40 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 569630 VENDOR 222430 - CROSSROADS VETERINARY CLINIC 20013129 32561 001 - 155410 - 631980 -00000 0.00 350.99 0.00 153461 MEDICAL CARE 20013116 R WOOPS 01 -9354 610 - 155410. 631970 -00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 200971 R WOOPS 01 -9354 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569573 VENDOR 173030 - D V & A 20012895 37660 307. 156110- 652650 -00000 0.00 101.71 0.00 153451 VIDEOS 20012895 3766N 307. 156110 - 652650 -00000 0.00 18.90 0.00 153451 VIDEOS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569690 VENDOR 265700 - DADE PAPER COMPANY 20012891 369265 001 - 155410 - 652510 -00000 0.00 344.90 0.00 201661 CAN LINERS 20012898 502404 408 - 233312 - 652510 -00000 0.00 140.00 0.00 200622 TOWELS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569580 VENDOR 174930 - DAVID B FOX 20013232 KARATE 12/1/01- 1/31/02 111. 156380 - 634999 -00000 0.00 942.50 0.00 201433 KARATE 12/1/01 - 1/31/02 20013215 KARATE 12/17/01- 1/23/02 111. 156381 - 634999 -00000 0.00 322.00 0.00 201033 KARATE 12/17/01- 1/23/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569617 VENDOR 205380 DAVID WEIGEL 20012714 1/17 -18 TRVL D WEIGEL 001. 010510- 640300 -00000 0.00 28.00 0.00 1/17 -18 TRVL 0 WEIGEL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569823 VENDOR 330830 DEANGELO BROTHERS 20013199 307.2091 RETAIN. RELEASE 320 - 000000 - 205100.00000 0.00 10,700.00 0.00 104160 RETAINAGE RELEASE VCHR NET 350.99 75.00 425.99 101.71 18.90 120.61 344.90 140.00 484.90 942.50 322.00 1,264.50 28.00 28.00 10,700.00 6J2AGE 41 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569514 VENDOR 138670 DEBBI MAXON 20013268 1/23 -31 TRVL D MAXON 123 - 155975 - 640200 -33075 0.00 30.16 123 - 155960 - 640200 -33060 0.00 7.25 0.00 1/23.31 TRVL D MAXON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569913 VENDOR 900030 DEBROAH GARDNER 301198 1122 TRVL D GARDNER 198 - 157410 - 640300 -00000 0.00 78.30 0.00 1/22 TRVL D GARDNER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569841 VENDOR 337090 DECASTER CAPRIOLE JOINT VENTURE 20012575 FEB 2002 313 - 163611 - 644100 -00000 0.00 3,172.59 101. 163609 - 644100 -00000 0.00 3,172.59 0.00 FEB 2002 200094 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569599 VENDOR 193310 DEHART ALARM SYSTEMS, INC. 20012897 11838 111 - 156332 - 646970 -00000 0.00 37.50 0.00 201959 SERVICE CALL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569825 VENDOR 332420 DELL COMPUTER CORP 20012905 733605513 408 - 253212 - 764900 -00000 0.00 1,426.00 0.00 203608 1500 GX 400 MINI TOWER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569673 VENDOR 256190 - DELL MARKETING L.P. 20013219 727316614 490 - 144610 - 764990 -00000 0.00 1,590.00 0.00 203583 1500 GX400 MINITOWER 20012882 737494161 301. 210140 - 764900 -01014 0.00 5.515.00 0.00 203626 POWEREDGE 4210 20012904 733606867 301. 210140 - 764900 -01014 0.00 3,147.00 0.00 203540 330 MINI TOWER VCHR NET 10,700.00 37.41 37.41 78.30 78.30 6,345.18 6,345.18 37.50 37.50 1,426.00 1,426.00 1,590.00 5,515.00 3,147.00 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 42 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012906 735489635 101 - 163620. 764900 -00000 0.00 1.390.00 0.00 1,390.00 203764 1500 GX400 MINI TOWER 20012882 737494179 301 - 210140 - 651950 -01014 0.00 63.00 0.00 63.00 203626 BACK PLATE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 11.705.00 CHECK NO 569385 VENDOR 4970 DEMCO 20012901 212043 001.156130- 652990 -00000 0.00 77.52 0.00 77.52 152917 PUPPETS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 77.52 CHECK NO 569810 VENDOR 327060 DENISE KIRK 20012594 1/15 -16 TRVL D KIRK 470 - 173410 - 640310 -00000 0.00 12.00 0.00 12.00 1/15 -16 TRVL D KIRK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 12.00 CHECK NO 569387 VENDOR 5240 DIAGNOSTIC SERVICES. INC. 20013316 K KEELING 1/10/02 001.155930.631990 -00000 0.00 171.60 0.00 171.60 201853 K KEELING 1110102 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 171.60 CHECK NO 569914 VENDOR 900030 . DIANA WATSON 301195 1113 -15 TRVL D WATSON 491. 144611 - 640300.33417 0.00 54.00 0.00 54.00 1/13 -15 TRVL D WATSON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 54.00 CHECK NO 569386 VENDOR 5180 DIANE B FLAGG 20012956 1/17 -18 TRVL D FLAGG 490. 144610 - 640300 -00000 0.00 21.00 0.00 21.00 1/17 -18 TRVL D FLAGG CHECK TOTAL 0.00 21.00 CHECK NO 569647 VENDOR 237770 DIANON SYSTEMS 20012900 B BRIGGS 12110101 001. 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 156.00 0.00 156.00 153388 B BRIGGS 12110101 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 156.00 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 43 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 569794 VENDOR 321130 - DIRECT TV 20012321 0001 - 026290522 111. 156380 - 634999 -00000 0.00 519.99 0.00 519.99 202949 1 YR SUBSCRIPTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 519.99 CHECK NO 569875 VENDOR 345930 - DIRECT TV 20013218 0017 - 016746794 118 - 144210 - 652990 -33781 0.00 9.99 0.00 9.99 151375 ADDITIONAL RECEIVER CHARGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9.99 CHECK NO 569840 VENDOR 336980 - DIXIE DRAINFIELD 20012483 12001 CASTRO REPAIR 191 - 138785 - 884200 -33751 0.00 3,575.00 0.00 3,575.00 204092 CASTRO #35998880006 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3.575.00 CHECK NO 569704 VENDOR 273270 - DONNA RIDEWOOD 20012955 1/21 -30 TRVL D RIDEWOOD 198 - 157430 - 640300.00000 0.00 258.00 0.00 258.00 1/21 -30 TRVL D RIDEWOOD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 258.00 CHECK NO 569898 VENDOR 350690 - DR. ALEX VRABLE 20012764 F.WHITE 117102 001 - 121810 - 631230 -00000 0.00 83.00 0.00 83.00 153357 F.WHITE EMPL.PHYS. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 83.00 CHECK NO 569710 VENDOR 275160 - DSI LABORATORIES 20013210 9986 001- 121810 - 649990 -00000 0.00 625.00 0.00 625.00 153347 ALCOHOL /DRUG TESTS 20013210 200106 -0 001. 121810- 649990 -00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 100.00 153347 ALCOHOL TESTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 725.00 CHECK NO 569560 VENDOR 166510 - DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COURTS 20012912 2627345 111. 138911- 649030 -00000 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 2627345 RECORDING FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J I GE 44 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012912 2629121 111. 138911 - 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 2629121 COPIES 20013324 2410078 313 - 163673 - 649030 -60071 0.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 2410078 COPIES 20012912 2506036 001- 013010 - 649030.00000 0.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 2506036 RECORDING 20012912 2628798 681. 421190- 634401 -00000 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 2628798 FEES 20012912 2629653 331 - 163650 - 634980 -60134 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 2629653 FEES 20013324 2627398 681 - 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 2627398 FEE 20012912 2627570 111 - 138911 - 651210 -00000 0.00 3.00 0.00 3.00 2627570 COPIES 20013324 2604531 001 - 122310 - 651210 -00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 2604531 COPIES 20012912 2461690 001- 013010- 649030.00000 0.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 2461690 RECORDING 20012912 2626537 331 - 163650 - 634980.60134 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 2626537 COPIES 20012912 2627403 111. 138911- 651210 -00000 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 2627403 COPIES 20012912 2627399 681. 421190 - 634401 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 2627399 FEES 20012912 2626188 681- 421190. 634401 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 2626188 FEES 20012912 2502840 111 - 138911- 651210.00000 0.00 14.00 0.00 14.00 2502840 COPIES 20013324 2631966 408 - 210111. 652990 -00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00 2631966 COPIES 20012912 2625515 001 - 010510 - 651210 -00000 0.00 4.00 0.00 4.00 2625515 COPIES 20013324 2634801 113. 138312. 649030 -00000 0.00 23.50 0.00 23.50 2634801 RECORDING FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 45 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012912 2628581 681 - 421190 - 634401.00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 2628581 FEES 20013324 2578821 113 - 138913 - 651210 -00000 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 2578821 COPIES 20012912 2623831 111 - 138911 - 651210 -00000 0.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 2623831 COPIES 20012912 2504294 001- 013010 - 649030 -00000 0.00 6.00 0.00 6.00 2504294 RECORDING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 326.50 CHECK NO 569558 VENDOR 166220 - E. B. SIMMONDS 20012902 12960 495 - 192370 - 634999 -00000 0.00 120.00 0.00 120.00 153225 TROUBLESHOOTING 20012907 12946 101 - 163630 - 646510 -00000 0.00 4,360.00 0.00 4,360.00 203691 LIGHT POLE REPAIR 20012907 12947 101 - 163630 - 646510.00000 0.00 4,360.00 0.00 4,360.00 203691 LIGHT POLE REPAIR 20012908 12954 111 - 156332 - 652992.00000 0.00 2,373.00 0.00 2,373.00 202323 REPAIRS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 11,213.00 CHECK NO 569819 VENDOR 330020 E.R. JAHNA INDUSTRIES 20012881 83550 195 - 110406. 634999 -10292 0.00 21,646.81 0.00 21,646.81 103919 BEACH SAND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 21.646.81 CHECK NO 569526 VENDOR 145150 EAST NAPLES FIRE CONTROL DISTRICT 20012579 FEB 2002 STATION 14 490 - 144610. 644100.00000 0.00 300.00 0.00 300.00 FEB 2002 STATION 14 200106 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 300.00 CHECK NO 569886 VENDOR 348590 - EAST NAPLES PHYSICAL THERAPY 20013237 J KEARNS 12/12 -14/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 156.00 0.00 156.00 153389 J KEARNS 12/12 -14/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 156.00 6J2AGE 46 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 569899 VENDOR 350710 EASTBAY 20012739 7914807 111 - 156349 - 652990 -00000 0.00 106.98 0.00 151003 SOFTBALL BAT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569651 VENDOR 240660 EBSCO PUBLISHING 20012893 5 -40124 307 - 156110 - 652650 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 153449 WALL STREET JOURNAL 20013239 0022926 307 - 156110 - 652650 -00000 0.00 13.06 0.00 153232 GLAMOUR 20013239 0022994 307 - 156110 - 652650 -00000 0.00 202.86 0.00 153232 INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY 20012893 CREDIT MEMO 001097 307 - 156110 - 652650 -00000 0.00 45.00- 0.00 153449 CREDIT MEMO 001097 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569568 VENDOR 169350 - ECKERD DRUG CO. 20013315 ACCT #1347 1/8/02 001 - 155930 - 652710 -00000 0.00 366.63 0.00 201854 ACCT# 1347 1/8/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569577 VENDOR 174350 - ELITE FIRE & SAFETY EQUIPMENT, INC 20012903 17756 146 - 144380 - 652910 -00000 0.00 12.00 0.00 153237 AXE HANDLES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569482 VENDOR 114800 ELLIS K. PHELPS & COMPANY 20013220 057589 408 - 233351- 655100 -00000 0.00 437.85 0.00 200766 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569596 VENDOR 190020 ELSIE GONZALEZ 20013234 1/23/02 1.5 HRS 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 24.00 0.00 1/23/02 1.5 HRS 20013234 1/23/02 4.5 HRS 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 64.00 0.00 1/23/02 4.5 HRS FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20013234 1117102 4 HRS 1/17/02 4 HRS 20013234 1/28/02 5 HRS 1/28/02 5 HRS 20013234 1/24/02 1 HR 1/24/02 1 HR 20013234 1/24/02 3.5 HRS 1/24/02 3.5 HRS 20013234 1/22/02 4.5 HRS 1/22/02 4.5 HRS 20013234 1/22/02 1 HR 1/22102 1 HR 20013234 1/25/02 2.5 HRS 1/25/02 2.5 HRS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 681 - 421190. 634402 -00000 0.00 681 - 431590. 634402.00000 0.00 681 - 421190. 634402 -00000 0.00 681 - 431590. 634402 -00000 0.00 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569575 VENDOR 173480 - EMERGENCY MEDICAL SUPPLY, INC. 20013236 247064 80.00 490. 144610. 652720.00000 80.00 153137 BULK DRESSING 16.00 20013235 247384 56.00 490. 144610- 652720.00000 0.00 201439 MEDICAL SUPPLIES 0.00 20013235 248090 0.00 490. 144610 - 652720.00000 CHECK TOTAL 201439 MEDICAL SUPPLIES 109.80 20013236 247064 79.90 490. 144610- 652720.00000 79.90 201439 SUPPLIES 102.80 20013236 247197 570.75 490. 144610- 652720 -00000 0.00 201439 SUPPLIES 0.00 20013236 247197 0.00 490 - 144610. 652720 -00000 CHECK TOTAL 153137 BULK DRESSING 20013235 247742 490 - 144610 - 652720 -00000 201439 MEDICAL SUPPLIES CHECK NO 569583 VENDOR 179840 - EMERGENCY PET HOSPITAL OF COLLIER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16J2AGE 47 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 64.00 0.00 64.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 56.00 0.00 56.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 432.00 109.80 0.00 109.80 79.90 0.00 79.90 102.80 0.00 102.80 570.75 0.00 570.75 55.95 0.00 55.95 27.45 0.00 27.45 73.15 0.00 73.15 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,019.80 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J ZGE 48 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013240 8089 001. 155410 - 631980 -00000 0.00 104.00 0.00 104.00 153460 VET CARE 11/30/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 104.00 CHECK NO 569788 VENDOR 317080 - ENDOCRINE SPECIALIST PA 20013233 E HINOJOSA 12/19/01 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 130.00 0.00 130.00 153390 E HINOJOSA 12/19/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 130.00 CHECK NO 569900 VENDOR 350780 - ENGINEERING NEWS RECORD 20012899 1 YEAR SUBSCRIPTION 470 - 173410 - 654110 -00000 0.00 77.00 0.00 77.00 1 YEAR SUBSCRIPTION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 77.00 CHECK NO 569897 VENDOR 350640 - ERIC WISE 20012771 REIMB.E.WISE DR.LIC 12/18 408- 253212 - 649010 -00000 0.00 25.25 0.00 25.25 152244 DRIVERS LIC. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 25.25 CHECK NO 569740 VENDOR 287960 - ESQUIRE DEPOSITION SERVICES 20013211 J OVALLE 2000.1648CF 681 - 410310- 633032 -00000 0.00 143.00 0.00 143.00 J OVALLE 2000.1648CF CHECK TOTAL 0.00 143.00 CHECK NO 569388 VENDOR 6120 - EVANS OIL COMPANY 20012894 220051 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 183.66 0.00 183.66 200625 FUEL 20012894 DISCOUNT 220051/220297 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 19.00- 0.00 19.00- 200625 DISCOUNT 220051/220297 20012894 220297 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 766.33 0.00 766.33 200625 FUEL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 930.99 CHECK NO 569903 VENDOR 350840 - EXECUTIVE TITLE & JAIME VALLE 20013276 D/P J VALLE 191. 138785 - 884100 -33751 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 2,500.00 204134 D/P J VALLE #36123480005 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION CHECK NO 569624 VENDOR 214900 - F.P.L. 20013317 53212.55092 12/27- 1/29/02 53212.55092 12/27/01- 1/29/02 20013322 48425.34572 12/19- 1/23/02 48425 -34572 12/19/01- 1/23/02 20013344 28385 -65485 12/19- 1/23/02 28385 -65485 12/19/01- 1/23/02 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 101 - 163630 - 643100 -00000 0.00 408 - 233351 - 643100 -00000 0.00 408 - 253211 - 643100 -00000 0.00 408- 253212 - 643100 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569862 VENDOR 343570 - FAPPO, C/O ALAN WEAVER, CPPB 22.95 20012716 REGIST R GEORGE 4/23 -26 001. 121710 - 640300 -00000 0.00 5.90 153379 REGIST R GEORGE 4/23 -26 13.40 25.75 CHECK NO 569390 VENDOR 6250 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP 20.15 20013209 5- 069 -38656 10.30 001 - 156110 - 641950 -00000 0.00 5.55 153244 SHIPPING 1/7/02 31.60 20013222 4- 051 -65899 490 - 144610 - 641950 -00000 0.00 200120 SHIPPING 1/12/02 20012885 4- 096 -04047 001 - 121810. 641950 -00000 0.00 201513 SHIPPING 1/17/02 20013213 4. 053.66352 495. 192310- 641950 -00000 0.00 202295 SHIPPING 1110102 20012883 4- 053 -34343 495 - 192310. 641950 -00000 0.00 202295 SHIPPING 12/31/01 20013222 4- 100 -02537 490. 144610- 641950 -00000 0.00 200120 SHIPPING 1/18/02 20012886 4- 071 -13171 681 - 421510 - 641950 -00000 0.00 201314 SHIPPING 1/4/02 20013241 4- 096.04053 313 - 163673. 641950 -60109 0.00 152343 SHIPPING 1/16/02 20012886 4- 070 -84752 681 - 421510. 641950 -00000 0.00 201314 SHIPPING 12/26/01 16J2AGE 49 AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 26,042.13 9,524.21 29,587.99 61,685.81 CHECK TOTAL 200.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 2,500.00 26,042.13 9,524.21 91,273.80 126.840.14 200.00 200.00 22.95 0.00 22.95 6.85 0.00 6.85 5.90 0.00 5.90 13.40 0.00 13.40 25.75 0.00 25.75 20.15 0.00 20.15 10.30 0.00 10.30 5.55 0.00 5.55 31.60 0.00 31.60 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 50 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012887 4- 084.89550 001 - 144510 - 641950 -00000 0.00 16.20 0.00 16.20 200567 SHIPPING 1/14/02 20013212 4- 086 -18413 113 - 138900 - 641950.00000 0.00 13.00 0.00 13.00 200089 SHIPPING 12/31/01 20013208 4- 051 -84839 413. 263611 - 641950 -73949 0.00 15.90 0.00 15.90 153337 SHIPPING 1110102 20013310 4- 073.73842 001 - 122310 - 641950 -00000 0.00 5.90 0.00 5.90 201810 SHIPPING 1/14/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 193.45 CHECK NO 569572 VENDOR 172870 - FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION 20013221 4- 083 -17380 001 - 000000 - 142900 -00000 0.00 7.95 0.00 7.95 200057 SHIPPING 1/16/02 20013311 4- 049 -37162 123. 155975- 641950 -33075 0.00 19.05 0.00 19.05 106979 SHIPPING 1/4/02 20012890 4- 063 -21043 001. 138710. 641950 -00000 0.00 16.65 0.00 16.65 200002 SHIPPING 1/4/02 20012889 4- 084.91488 113 - 138312. 641950 -00000 0.00 18.30 0.00 18.30 200437 SHIPPING 1/14/02 20012888 4- 076 -77372 111 - 138317 - 641950.00000 0.00 30.45 0.00 30.45 200515 SHIPPING 12/24/01 20013311 4- 096 -05063 123 - 155975 - 641950 -33075 0.00 13.05 0.00 13.05 106979 SHIPPING 1/14/02 20012888 4- 077 -71580 111 - 138317. 641950 -00000 0.00 122.65 0.00 122.65 200515 SHIPPING 1111102 20012890 4- 063 -53230 001. 138710 - 641950.00000 0.00 5.90 0.00 5.90 200002 SHIPPING 1110102 20013311 4- 049 -68504 123 - 155975 - 641950 -33075 0.00 22.55 0.00 22.55 106979 SHIPPING 1/9/02 20012884 4- 100 -00668 111 - 156310 - 641950 -00000 0.00 7.75 111 - 156341 - 641950 -00000 0.00 85.85 0.00 93.60 201721 SHIPPING 1/15/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 350.15 CHECK NO 569476 VENDOR 110620 - FERGUSON ENTERPRISES FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 51 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013226 839987 408 - 233351 - 655100 -00000 0.00 59.20 0.00 59.20 200770 PARTS 20013226 839553 408 - 233351 - 655100 -00000 0.00 697.19 0.00 697.19 200770 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 756.39 CHECK NO 569466 VENDOR 105760 - FERGUSON UNDERGROUND 20013229 839317 408 - 253212 - 655100 -00000 0.00 8,206.80 0.00 8,206.80 200210 PARTS 20013224 839451 408. 210130- 655200 -00000 0.00 1,200.00 0.00 1,200.00 200724 WIRE FLAGS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9,406.80 CHECK NO 569678 VENDOR 257370 - FERGUSON UNDERGROUND INC. #125 20013223 839716 408 - 233312 - 655200 -00000 0.00 22.62 0.00 22.62 200626 PARTS 20013223 839905 408 - 233312 - 655200 -00000 0.00 449.09 0.00 449.09 200626 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 471.71 CHECK NO 569861 VENDOR 343520 - FGCA 20013309 J SEIDL F.G.C.A. DUES 001 - 100130 - 654210 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 153710 J SEIDL F.G.C.A. DUES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.00 CHECK NO 569766 VENDOR 303710 - FIRST ANESTHESIA ASSOC INC 20013314 A GUREGHIAN 12/10/01 001 - 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 405.60 0.00 405.60 201855 A GUREGHIAN 12/10/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 405.60 CHECK NO 569488 VENDOR 116470 - FIRST TITLE & ABSTRACT, INC. 20013227 B -12255 313 - 163673. 631650 -62071 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 202660 PARCEL 103 20013227 B -12318 313 - 163673 - 631650 -62071 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 202660 PARCEL 102B FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 52 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013227 B -12319 313 - 163673 - 631650 -62071 0.00 175.00 0.00 175.00 202660 PARCEL 118A 20013308 B -12364 412 - 273511. 631650.70066 0.00 225.00 0.00 225.00 153664 FOLIO #37227640009 20013227 B -12252 313 - 163673 - 631650 -62071 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 202660 PARCEL 102C CHECK TOTAL 0.00 550.00 CHECK NO 569742 VENDOR 288620 - FLA GOVERNMENTAL UTILITY AUTHORITY 20013216 21 -02. 3236 -1 -1 12/10 -1 /11 408 - 210105 - 643400 -00000 0.00 221.44 0.00 221.44 21 -02. 3236 -1 -1 12/10/01- 1/11/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 221.44 CHECK NO 569707 VENDOR 273880 - FLASH EQUIPMENT. INC. 20013228 27256 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 54.90 0.00 54.90 200627 PARTS 20013228 27460 521. 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 868.99 0.00 868.99 200627 PARTS 20013228 27487 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 103.98 0.00 103.98 200627 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,027.87 CHECK NO 569659 VENDOR 248020 - FLORIDA CANCER SPECIALISTS 20013313 A DURAN 118102 001. 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 11.70 0.00 11.70 201856 A DURAN 1/8/02 20013313 A DURAN 1/8/02 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 55.90 0.00 55.90 201856 A DURAN 1/8/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 67.60 CHECK NO 569674 VENDOR 256550 FLORIDA COMMUNITY BANK 20012587 FEB 2002 RENT SHERIFF 001. 061010 - 644100 -00000 0.00 960.75 0.00 960.75 FEB 2002 201949 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 960.75 CHECK NO 569595 VENDOR 187570 FLORIDA GOLDCOAST DIVING ASSOC. FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012863 1/14/02 CLUB MMB /SHIP 152217 CLUB REG.2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 111 - 156313 - 654210 -00000 0.00 16JIGE AMT NET VCHR DISC 150.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569355 VENDOR 204830 - FLORIDA MEDICAID /COUNTY BILLING 20013323 CB 0112 001- 155930 - 634107.00000 0.00 18,315.00 AND CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 569354 VENDOR 204830 - FLORIDA MEDICAID /COUNTY BILLING 20013312 RB 0112 001. 155930 - 634107 -00000 0.00 440.00 AND CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 569353 VENDOR 204830 - FLORIDA MEDICAID /COUNTY BILLING 20013290 CB 0112 001 - 155930 - 634106 -00000 0.00 58,460.96 AND CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 569706 VENDOR 273800 - FLORIDA PC DISTRIBUTORS, INC. 20013242 21771 491 - 144611. 652990 -33417 0.00 12,200.00 203038 LASER PRINTERS CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 569546 VENDOR 160060 - FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT 20013230 488711 333. 163650- 763100 -60071 0.00 136,353.00 106358 POLE RELOCATION CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 569394 VENDOR 6790 - FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT 20013304 01933 -76233 11/5- 11/27/01 408- 233351. 643100 -00000 0.00 0.00 01933 -76233 11/5/01- 11/27/01 20013303 73965 -45530 12/20- 1/24/02 408 - 233313 - 643100 -00000 0.00 73965 -45530 12/20/01- 1/24/02 20013306 76422 -01375 11/5- 11/27/01 408. 233351 - 643100.00000 0.00 76422 -01375 11/5/01. 11/27/01 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 150.00 150.00 18.315.00 18,315.00 440.00 440.00 58,460.96 58,460.96 12,200.00 12,200.00 136,353.00 136,353.00 22.67 0.00 22.67 52.72 0.00 52.72 20.71 0.00 20.71 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 54 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013302 90849 -80235 12/20- 1/24/02 408 - 233313 - 643100.00000 0.00 25.93 0.00 25.93 90849 -80235 12/20/01- 1/24/02 20013306 40357 -28403 12/17. 1/18/02 408- 233313 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 40357 -28403 12/17/01- 1/18/02 20013306 60927 -43068 12/21. 1/25/02 150 - 162545 - 643100 -00000 0.00 75.88 0.00 75.88 60927 -43068 12/21/01- 1/25/02 20013305 92617 -71175 11/26 -12/27 160. 162518 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 92617 -71175 11/26/01- 12/27/01 20013303 84554 -61122 12/18- 1/22/02 408. 233351 - 643100.00000 0.00 9.24 0.00 9.24 64554 -61122 12/18/01 - 1/22/02 20013302 75562 -30055 12/21- 1/25/02 778 - 182701 - 643100 -00000 0.00 78.64 0.00 78.64 75562 -30055 12/21- 1/25/02 20013304 74015 -71141 12/12- 1/15/02 408 - 233312 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.89 0.00 9.89 74015 -71141 12/12/01- 1/15/02 20013302 26881.33004 12/21- 1/25/02 109 - 182901 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 26881 -33004 12/21/01- 1/25/02 20013214 26864 -75001 12/13 - 1/16/02 495 - 192370 - 643100 -00000 0.00 166.67 0.00 166.67 26864 -75001 12/13/01. 1/16/02 200152 20013305 79337 -32260 11/29. 1/2/02 152 - 162541 - 643100 -00000 0.00 33.11 0.00 33.11 79337 -32260 11/29/01- 1/2/02 20013305 29323 -04062 12/21- 1/25/02 150 - 162545 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.62 0.00 9.62 29323 -04062 12/21/01- 1/25/02 20013303 63291 -11170 12/20- 1/24/02 408 - 233313 - 643100 -00000 0.00 12,706.36 0.00 12,706.36 63291.11170 12/20/01. 1/24/02 20013302 23664 -71569 12/19 - 1/23/02 408 - 233351. 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 23664.71569 12/19/01- 1/23/02 20013305 87251 -32073 12/20- 1/24/02 001 - 156140 - 643100 -00000 0.00 721.34 0.00 721.34 87251 -32073 12/20/01- 1/24/02 20013307 70418 -33158 12/17- 1/18/02 408 - 253212 - 643100 -00000 0.00 7,761.41 0.00 7,761.41 70418 -33158 12/17/01- 1/18/02 20013307 07782 -51314 12/7- 1/10/02 001. 061010 - 643100 -00000 0.00 178.90 001. 144510- 643100 -00000 0.00 279.54 490 - 144610 - 643100 -00000 0.00 100.64 0.00 559.08 07782 -51314 12/7/01- 1/10/02 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 55 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013306 19681 -76089 12/21- 1/25/02 109 - 182901 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.24 0.00 9.24 19681 -76089 12/21/01. 1/25/02 20013305 95646 -99230 11/26 -12/27 111 - 163646 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 95646 -99230 11/26/01- 12/27/01 20013304 73952 -39168 12/13- 1/16/02 154 - 172520. 643100 -00000 0.00 32.48 0.00 32.48 73952 -39168 12/13/01- 1/16/02 20013307 01458 -36201 12/7. 1/10/02 113 - 138900 - 643100 -00000 0.00 7,996.64 0.00 7,996.64 01458 -36201 12/7/01- 1/10/02 20013304 36399 -51106 12/14- 1/17/02 408 - 233351 - 643100 -00000 0.00 40.35 0.00 40.35 36399 -51106 12/14/01- 1/17/02 20013306 75152 -48438 12/21 - 1/25/02 408 - 233351 - 643100 -00000 0.00 17.99 0.00 17.99 75152 -48438 12121/01 - 1/25/02 20013302 75532 -38077 12/21- 1/25/02 778 - 182701 - 643100 -00000 0.00 1,098.34 0.00 1,098.34 75532 -38077 12/21/01- 1/25/02 20013303 90299 -32127 12/19- 1/23/02 408 - 233312 - 643100 -00000 0.00 39.199.05 0.00 39,199.05 90299 -32127 12119/01- 1/23/02 20013304 99914 -46015 12/21. 1/25/02 001 - 156170 - 643100 -00000 0.00 609.32 0.00 609.32 99914 -46015 12/21/01- 1/25/02 20013305 74037 -36130 12/11- 1/14/02 134 - 172530 - 643100 -00000 0.00 9.09 0.00 9.09 74037 -36130 12/11/01- 1/14/02 20013306 19773 -44306 12/21- 1/25/02 111 - 156332 - 643100 -00000 0.00 155.47 0.00 155.47 19773 -44306 12/21/01- 1/25/02 20013214 16424 -38103 12/13- 1/16/02 495 - 192370 - 643100 -00000 0.00 735.29 0.00 735.29 16424 -38103 12/13/01. 1/16/02 20013303 24516 -13315 12/20- 1/24/02 408- 233313 - 643100 -00000 0.00 276.53 0.00 276.53 24516 -13315 12/20/01- 1/24/02 20013306 68644 -35182 12/21- 1/25/02 109 - 182901. 643100 -00000 0.00 72.87 0.00 72.87 68644 -35182 12/21/01- 1/25/02 20013304 47877 -28106 12/7- 1/10/02 113 - 138900. 643100 -00000 0.00 17.15 0.00 17.15 47877 -28106 12/7 - 1/10/02 20013214 63564 -30147 12/13- 1/16/02 495 - 192370. 643100 -00000 0.00 164.23 0.00 164.23 63564 -30147 12/13- 1/16/02 200152 20013302 98397 -98049 12/14- 1/17/02 408 - 233313. 643100.00000 0.00 1.830.37 0.00 1.830.37 98397 -98049 12/14/01- 1/17/02 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 569478 VENDOR 112450 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 1140013303 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 566.46 200809 LIMEROCK 566.46 20012909 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 897.51 200809 LIMEROCK 897.51 FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER 79.81 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 20013305 72492 -84055 11/29- 1/2/02 152 - 162541 - 643100 -00000 0.00 20012892 72492 -84055 11/29/01- 1/2/02 CHECK TOTAL 203573 LIMEROCK 20013302 05453 -33056 12/21- 1/25/02 778 - 182701 - 643100 -00000 0.00 203573 LIMEROCK 05453 -33056 12/21/01- 1/25/02 1140013332 470 - 173441 - 763100 -00000 20013303 25211 -69579 12/19- 1/23/02 408 - 233313 - 643100 -00000 0.00 25211.69579 12/19/01- 1/23/02 20013304 55109.29473 12/14- 1/17/02 408. 233313- 643100 -00000 0.00 55109.29473 12/14/01. 1/17/02 20013302 75552 -32029 12/21- 1/25/02 778 - 182701 - 643100.00000 0.00 75552 -32029 12/21/01- 1/25/02 20013214 75152 -82494 12/13. 1/16/02 495 - 192370 - 643100 -00000 0.00 75152 -82494 12/13/01- 1/16/02 200152 20013306 76800 -30082 12/21- 1/25/02 109. 182901. 643100 -00000 0.00 76800 -30082 12/21/01- 1/25/02 20013304 67921 -12424 12/20- 1/24/02 408 - 233313 - 643100 -00000 0.00 67921 -12424 12/20/01- 1/24/02 20013305 24493.33059 12/20- 1/24/02 109 - 182901 - 643100 -00000 0.00 24493.33059 12/20/01- 1/24/02 CHECK NO 569478 VENDOR 112450 FLORIDA ROCK INDUSTRIES 20012909 1140013303 111 - 163645 - 653110 -00000 566.46 200809 LIMEROCK 566.46 20012909 1550000632 111 - 163645 - 653110 -00000 897.51 200809 LIMEROCK 897.51 20012909 1140013331 111. 163645 - 653110 -00000 79.81 200809 LIMEROCK 79.81 20012909 1140013282 111 - 163645. 653110 -00000 9.09 200809 LIMEROCK 9.09 20012892 1140013259 470 - 173441 - 763100 -00000 CHECK TOTAL 203573 LIMEROCK 76,237.61 20012892 1140013304 470. 173441- 763100 -00000 203573 LIMEROCK 20012892 1140013332 470 - 173441 - 763100 -00000 203573 LIMEROCK 16J2AGE 56 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 9.09 0.00 9.09 566.46 0.00 566.46 35.36 0.00 35.36 897.51 0.00 897.51 58.98 0.00 58.98 79.81 0.00 79.81 9.09 0.00 9.09 9.09 0.00 9.09 9.09 0.00 9.09 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 76,237.61 0.00 1,065.09 0.00 1,065.09 0.00 78.50 0.00 78.50 0.00 625.59 0.00 625.59 0.00 377.46 0.00 377.46 0.00 145.51 0.00 145.51 0.00 204.87 0.00 204.87 0.00 358.86 0.00 358.86 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 57 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05. 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012892 1140013234 470. 173441. 763100 -00000 0.00 222.96 0.00 222.96 203573 LIMEROCK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,078.84 CHECK NO 569822 VENDOR 330430 - FLORIDA RURAL WATER ASSOCIATION 20013270 REGIST M KELLY /F TERILLA 408 - 233350 - 654210 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 153719 REGIST M KELLT/F TERILLA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 CHECK NO 569511 VENDOR 135230 - FLORIDA STATE UNDERGROUND, INC 20013231 CULVERT INSTALL 1/25/02 313- 163673 - 763100.60055 0.00 124,216.92 0.00 124,216.92 203390 CULVERT INSTALL 1/25/02 20013280 #4 RETAINAGE 414 - 000000 - 205100.00000 0.00 66,534.26- 0.00 66,534.26- 107407 11/26 - 12/25/01 RETAINAGE 20013280 #4 414 - 263611 - 763100 -74125 0.00 665.342.68 0.00 665.342.68 107407 11/26- 12/25/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 723,025.34 CHECK NO 569366 VENDOR 329160 FLORIDA TURFGRASS ASSOCIATION, INC. 20013053 4852 109 - 182901- 654360 -00000 0.00 160.00 0.00 160.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 160.00 CHECK NO 569653 VENDOR 243280 FLORIDA WATER SERVICES 20013217 000576615.9 11/16 -12/18 001. 156363- 643400 -00000 0.00 339.74 0.00 339.74 000576615.9 11/16- 12/18/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 339.74 CHECK NO 569910 VENDOR 351230 - FLORIDA WATER SERVICES 20013345 IMPACT FEES /S MARCO BEACH 346- 116360. 649010 -00173 0.00 5,250.63 0.00 5,250.63 IMPACT FEES /SOUTH MARCO BEACH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,250.63 CHECK NO 569745 VENDOR 290310 - FREIGHTLINER OF TAMPA 20013225 120140P 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 128.54 0.00 128.54 200826 PARTS FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20013225 CM119851P 200826 CREDIT 20013225 120864P 200826 PARTS 20013225 120154P 200826 PARTS 20013225 120642P 200826 PARTS 20013225 CM118614P 200826 CREDIT 20013225 120686P 200826 PARTS 20013225 120584P 200826 PARTS CHECK NO 569608 VENDOR 196650 - FSBPA 20013238 R HOVELL MEMBERSHIP APP 153335 R HOVELL MEMBERSHIP APP. CHECK NO 569832 VENDOR 333980 - G&K SERVICES COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS VCHR DISC SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 16J2AGE 58 AMT NET VCHR DISC 33.00- 0.00 126.80 0.00 150.66 0.00 64.39 0.00 269.23- 0.00 26.51 0.00 2.02 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 195 - 110407 - 654210.00000 0.00 750.00 CHECK TOTAL 20012703 674347 1/7 101 - 163630 - 652130.00000 0.00 200025 1 /7.4.75C0RRECTION 36.85 20012922 674337 1/7 001- 155410 - 652130.00000 0.00 201167 1/7 17.14 20012936 665541 12121 408 - 253250 - 652130 -00000 0.00 201628 12/21 24.18 20012706 674354 1/7 408 - 233313 - 652130 -00000 200658 1/7 20012700 674336 1/7 408 - 253211. 652130 -00000 200384 1/7 20012937 67335 1/7 111 - 156332. 652130 -00000 201438 1/7 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 33.00- 126.80 150.66 64.39 269.23- 26.51 2.02 196.69 750.00 750.00 0.00 49.37 0.00 49.37 0.00 36.85 0.00 36.85 0.00 38.15 0.00 38.15 0.00 17.14 0.00 17.14 0.00 84.72 0.00 84.72 0.00 24.18 0.00 24.18 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 59 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012932 674340 1/7 111 - 156381 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1.44 0.00 1.44 201478 1 /7S 20012710 674338 1/7 408- 233350 - 652130.00000 0.00 29.40 0.00 29.40 200752 1 /7S 20012707 674355 1/7 408 - 233312. 652130 -00000 0.00 131.03 0.00 131.03 200612 1/7 20012935 6339936 1/7 001. 172930 - 652130 -00000 0.00 66.59 0.00 66.59 202113 11/7 20012701 673505 1/4 408- 253221 - 652130 -00000 0.00 65.25 0.00 65.25 200420 1/4 20012936 673540 1/4 408 - 253250. 652130 -00000 0.00 38.15 0.00 38.15 201628 1/4 20012935 675914 1/9 001. 172930 - 652130 -00000 0.00 64.09 0.00 64.09 202113 1/9 20012932 674340 1/7 111 - 156381 - 652130 -00000 0.00 4.03 0.00 4.03 201478 1 /7S 20012709 671123 1/1 470 - 173442 - 652130 -00000 0.00 17.34 0.00 17.34 201124 1/1 20012709 675109 1/8 470 - 173442 - 652130 -00000 0.00 17.34 0.00 17.34 201124 1/8 20012937 67335 1/7 111 - 156390 - 652130 -00000 0.00 3.22 0.00 3.22 201438 1/7 20012935 667941 12/26 001 - 172930 - 652130.00000 0.00 64.09 0.00 64.09 202113 12/26 20012705 674339 1/7 408- 233352 - 652130 -00000 0.00 116.61 0.00 116.61 200715 1 /7S 20012699 674346 1/7 111 - 163647 - 652130 -00000 0.00 35.17 0.00 35.17 200374 1/7 20012704 674349 1/7 408 - 233351 - 652130 -00000 0.00 316.73 0.00 316.73 200774 1/7 20012937 674356 1/7 111. 156332- 652130.00000 0.00 30.41 0.00 30.41 201438 1/7 20012931 673484 1/4 470 - 173441 - 652130 -00000 0.00 37.95 0.00 37.95 201191 1 /4S CHECK NO 569499 VENDOR 127700 - GAMETIME 20012690 668618 001 - 156363 - 646452 -00000 0.00 529.00 0.00 529.00 151728 NURSERY SEAT FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 60 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012698 674342 1/7 408 - 253212 - 652130 -00000 0.00 258.83 0.00 258.83 200222 1/7 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,548.08 CHECK NO 569848 VENDOR 339190 - G &K SERVICES 20012939 675095 1/8 101 - 163620 - 652130 -00000 0.00 79.93 0.00 79.93 201127 1/8 1.00 CIRRECTION 20012702 674352 1/7 109 - 182901- 652990.00000 0.00 1.95 0.00 1.95 200069 1/7 20012939 675910 1/9 101 - 163620 - 652130 -00000 0.00 222.46 0.00 222.46 201127 1/9 8.20 CORRECTION 20012702 674352 1/7 109 - 182602. 652130 -00000 0.00 16.12 0.00 16.12 200069 1/7 20012938 674344 1/7 001 - 122240. 652130 -00000 0.00 121.27 0.00 121.27 201234 1/7 20012702 674352 1/7 109 - 182901. 652130 -00000 0.00 53.96 0.00 53.96 200069 1 /7S 20012939 671928 1/8 101 - 163620. 652130 -00000 0.00 222.46 0.00 222.46 201127 1/8 30.7000RRECTION 20012938 670353 12/21 001 - 122240 - 652130 -00000 0.00 121.27 0.00 121.27 201234 12121 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 839.42 CHECK NO 569396 VENDOR 7400 - GALE RESEARCH COMPANY 20012942 11311390 355 - 156190 - 766100 -00000 0.00 160.97 0.00 160.97 200549 TITLES 20012942 11310654 355 - 156190- 766100 -00000 0.00 271.81 0.00 271.81 200549 TITLES 20012942 11311391 355 - 156190 - 766100.00000 0.00 482.98 0.00 482.98 200549 TITLES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 915.76 CHECK NO 569499 VENDOR 127700 - GAMETIME 20012690 668618 001 - 156363 - 646452 -00000 0.00 529.00 0.00 529.00 151728 NURSERY SEAT ri 6J2AGE 61 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569783 VENDOR 314410 GARDEN ST. PAPER PRODUCTS CORP. 20012930 4329 470 - 173441 - 652990 -00000 0.00 180.00 0.00 201203 WIRE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569576 VENDOR 173740 GASTROENTEROLOGY GROUP OF NAPLES PA 20013077 R RABASSA 1 /10 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 142.35 0.00 201857 1 /10 20012929 R RABASA 12/14 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 189.15 0.00 201857 R RABASSA 20013077 S NEWELL 1 /11 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 46.15 0.00 201857 1 /11 20013077 S NEWELL 1/21 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 674.70 0.00 201857 1121 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569395 VENDOR 7320 - GAYLORD BROTHERS, INC. 20012941 197956 001.156110- 652610 -00000 0.00 108.54 0.00 201227 LIBRARY SUPPLIES 20012941 196895 001 - 156110 - 652610 -00000 0.00 701.46 0.00 201227 LIBRARY SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569502 VENDOR 130240 - GEORGE YILMAZ 20012713 8/17 -24/01 TRVL G YILMAZ 470 - 173410 - 640300 -00000 0.00 48.00 0.00 8/17 -24/01 TRVL G YILMAZ 20012713 1/17 -19 TRVL G YILMAZ 470 - 173410 - 640300 -00000 0.00 15.00 0.00 1/17 -19 TRVL G YILMAZ CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569397 VENDOR 7740 - GOLDEN GATE ANIMAL CLINIC 20012940 019088 RENSABASE 610.155410- 631970 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 200975 SPAY /NEUTER FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA VENDOR 7770 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 73326 75.00 111 - 163645. 646314 -00000 75.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 60.00 20012934 73350 FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER 200836 DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 20012940 012502 COOPER 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 TURF 200975 SPAY /NEUTER 73336 0.00 20012940 018252 TIEDMANN 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 20012934 200975 SPAY /NEUTER 111. 163645- 646314.00000 0.00 20012940 029552 C SOLIS 610 - 155410 - 631970 -00000 0.00 0.00 200975 029552 C SOLIS SPAY /NEUTE TURF 7/5/01 CHECK NO 569399 VENDOR 7770 - GOLDEN GATE NURSERY 20012934 73326 75.00 111 - 163645. 646314 -00000 75.00 200836 TURF 60.00 20012934 73350 260.00 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 200836 TURF 90.00 20012934 73323 0.00 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 200836 TURF 180.00 20012934 73336 0.00 111 - 163645. 646314 -00000 0.00 200836 TURF 90.00 20012934 73261 0.00 111. 163645- 646314.00000 0.00 200836 TURF 90.00 20012913 71292 0.00 111 - 163645 - 646314.00000 0.00 151703 TURF 7/5/01 90.00 20012934 73332 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 200836 TURF 20012934 73342 111 - 163645. 646314 -00000 200836 TURF 20012934 73345 111. 163645. 646314 -00000 200836 TURF 20012934 73256 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 200836 TURF 20012934 73321 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 200836 TURF 20012934 73251 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 200836 TURF 20012934 73338 111. 163645 - 646314 -00000 200836 TURF 16J2AGE 62 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 65.00 0.00 65.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 260.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 180.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 63 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012696 V#007770 1/9 408 - 233352. 646314.00000 0.00 420.00 0.00 420.00 151435 1/9 PALM 20012934 73355 111 - 163645 - 646314 -00000 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 200836 TURF CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,860.00 CHECK NO 569864 VENDOR 344110 - GOLDEN GATE PHYSICAL THERAPY 20012694 M VERTIE 12/21 &12/26 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 146.25 0.00 146.25 153391 12/21 &12/26 M VERTIE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 146.25 CHECK NO 569358 VENDOR 250110 GOVERNOR'S HURRICANE CONFERENCE 20013262 REGIST J PAGE 5/20 -24 118 - 144210. 654360 -33781 0.00 125.00 0.00 125.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 125.00 CHECK NO 569400 VENDOR 7900 GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO INC 20013039 0630208862 10/17 408 - 233351. 655100 -00000 0.00 674.93 0.00 674.93 200778 10/17 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 674.93 CHECK NO 569515 VENDOR 138810 GREELEY & HANSEN 20011883 INV- 0000106529 411 - 273511. 763100 -70070 0.00 8,640.00 0.00 8,640.00 105441 12/1- 12/31/01 20010931 INV- 0000103078 FINAL 408 - 210111. 634999 -00000 0.00 14,124.00 0.00 14,124.00 106564 FINAL 20011883 INV- 0000106529 413 - 263611 - 631400 -73066 0.00 14,998.89 0.00 14,998.89 105441 12/1- 12/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 37,762.89 CHECK NO 569761 VENDOR 299230 GUARDIAN PERSONAL STORAGE 20012928 D 2 153 1/1 111 - 156425. 644170 -00000 0.00 58.00 0.00 58.00 201720 D2 -153 RENT FEB 20012927 CI 7 1/21 118 - 144210- 644170 -33781 0.00 216.00 0.00 216.00 202558 1/21 CI -7 STORAGE UNIT FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 64 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 274.00 CHECK NO 569872 VENDOR 345360 GULF COAST LANDFILL 20013289 N1201.02 408 - 233312 - 634999 -00000 0.00 30,995.73 0.00 30,995.73 201918 THRU 1/8/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 30,995.73 CHECK NO 569520 VENDOR 141030 GULF SHORE ASSOCIATES 20012555 FEB 2002 PELICAN BAY 109- 182601 - 644100.00000 0.00 643.92 109 - 182900 - 644100.00000 0.00 663.43 778 - 182700 - 644100.00000 0.00 643.92 0.00 1,951.27 FEB 2002 200065 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,951.27 CHECK NO 569687 VENDOR 263220 - GULF STATES INC. 20009972 #3 RETAINAGE 414- 000000- 205100.00000 0.00 5,587.91- 0.00 5,587.91- 105814 TO 12/31/01 RETAINAGE 20009972 #3 414 - 263611 - 763100.74015 0.00 55,879.12 0.00 55,879.12 105814 TO 12/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50,291.21 CHECK NO 569401 VENDOR 7990 - GULFSHORE ANIMAL CLINIC 20012926 01 -9054 A SKAKICH 610- 155410 - 631970.00000 0.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 200987 01.9054 A SKAKICH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 15.00 CHECK NO 569637 VENDOR 230940 GULFSHORE ENDOSCOPY CENTER, INC. 20012693 D SIZENSKY 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 429.65 0.00 429.65 153392 ENDOSCOPY D SIZENSKY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 429.65 CHECK NO 569891 VENDOR 349500 H BARBER & SONS INC 20012933 BL 16855 195 - 110406 - 764150.10505 0.00 39,430.00 0.00 39,430.00 203758 SURF RAKE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 39,430.00 CHECK NO 569536 VENDOR 152410 HACH FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012924 2933410 200386 1/8 20012925 2934324 202525 1/9 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JIAGE 65 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 408 - 253211 - 652310 -00000 0.00 551.70 0.00 408- 233312 - 652990 -00000 0.00 334.30 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569402 VENDOR 8180 - HARBORSIDE ANIMAL CLINIC 0.00 20012695 126652 0.00 001 - 155410 - 631980 -00000 0.00 0.00 153383 MED CARE ANIMALS 20012689 127719 001 - 155410- 631980 -00000 0.00 153366 MEDICAL ANIMALS 20012923 018442 M GULLEY 610- 155410 - 631970.00000 0.00 201012 M GULLEY 018442 CHECK NO 569506 VENDOR 131720 - HARCROS CHEMICALS, INC. 20013044 740056328 111- 156349 - 652311.00000 0.00 200539 12/27 CHECK NO 569799 VENDOR 322600 HELENA CHEMCAL, CO. 20013051 22721710 001 - 172930 - 652310 -00000 0.00 202241 CHEMS 20013051 22721473 001 - 172930 - 652310.00000 0.00 202241 CHEMS CHECK NO 569610 VENDOR 199810 HELENE ROSSLER 20013267 1/9.30 TRVL H ROSSLER 123 - 155975 - 640200 -33075 0.00 123 - 155960 - 640200 -33060 0.00 1/9 -30 TRVL H ROSSLER CHECK NO 569463 VENDOR 101060 - HENDERSON, FRANKLIN, STARNES & HOLT 20013073 MATTER #3816/629 313 - 163673- 651210 -69101 0.00 152342 MATTER # 3816/629 VCHR NET 551.70 334.30 886.00 28.00 0.00 28.00 42.00 0.00 42.00 15.00 0.00 15.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 85.00 544.00 0.00 544.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 544.00 1,050.60 0.00 1,050.60 7.240.70 0.00 7,240.70 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 8,291.30 33.64 16.24 0.00 49.88 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 49.88 403.86 0.00 403.86 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 66 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 403.86 CHECK NO 569769 VENDOR 305880 HILE CONTROLS OF FLORIDA INC 20012697 HCFINV0640 408 - 233312. 652910 -00000 0.00 265.61 0.00 265.61 150030 DO SENSOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 265.61 CHECK NO 569403 VENDOR 8810 HOLE MONTES AND ASSOC INC 20013300 42788 413 - 263611 - 631400 -73949 0.00 14,985.00 0.00 14,985.00 202328 11/24- 12/21/01 20013205 42719 413 - 263611 - 631400 -73076 0.00 2,200.40 0.00 2,200.40 105917 THRU 12/21/01 20013288 42754 331 - 163650 - 631400 -65041 0.00 37,711.40 0.00 37,711.40 101622 THRU 12/21/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 54.896.80 CHECK NO 569555 VENDOR 164250 - HOME DEPOT 20013026 3021062 1/9 001- 122240. 652989 -00000 0.00 8.85 0.00 8.85 201486 1/9 20012997 2200620 191 - 138785 - 884200.33751 0.00 930.46 0.00 930.46 203361 NIETO #63854800008 20013043 2010820 1 /10 001 - 156363 - 652990.00000 0.00 66.37 0.00 66.37 200912 1 /10 20012916 7041336 368 - 116360 - 763100 -80604 0.00 2,625.43 0.00 2,625.43 203853 1/15 PARTS 20012915 5041379 111- 156332 - 652990.00000 0.00 2,177.35 0.00 2,177.35 201159 1/17 PARTS 20013026 5031825 1/7 001 - 122240 - 652990.00000 0.00 84.89 0.00 84.89 201486 1/7 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5,893.35 CHECK NO 569721 VENDOR 281640 - HOME DEPOT COMMERCIAL ACCOUNTS 20012519 2221763 191 - 138785- 884100.33751 0.00 214.65 0.00 214.65 152592 HENDRICKS #25305002924 20012482 0200874 191 - 138785 - 884100 -33751 0.00 1,366.36 0.00 1,366.36 203821 HENDRICKS #25305002924 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012510 0200877 152950 TESLA #63375000882 20012512 6200799 152652 CRISP #62260800004 20012511 5211687 152948 LYON #36249160005 20012509 4201113 153265 ZAVALA #62258400005 20012514 3211576 152593 MACIAS #83243000363 20012517 0200876 152945 HENRICKS #25305002924 20012508 6201090 153231 TORRES #30805000385 20013005 7211647 152805 NIETO #63854800008 20012508 6201091 153231 TORRES #30805000385 20012516 4201112 153264 MACIAS #83243000363 20012481 9200893 203820 MCDUFFIE #36249360009 20012518 6200800 152653 CRISP #62260800004 20012515 7211644 152594 MACIAS #83243000363 20013318 7211209 FOLIO:70921533709 70921533709 HOUSTON 153674 20012513 7201069 153223 CHERY #35880600006 20013319 2211424 FOLIO:63854800008 63854800008 NIETO 152591 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS VCHR DISC SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 191 - 138785 - 884100.33751 0.00 191 - 138785 - 884100.33751 0.00 191 - 138785 - 884100 -33751 0.00 191 - 138785 - 884100 -33751 0.00 191 - 138785 - 884100 -33751 0.00 191 - 138785. 884100 -33751 0.00 191. 138785. 884100 -33751 0.00 191. 138785- 884200 -33751 0.00 191 - 138785 - 884100 -33751 0.00 191 - 138785- 884100 -33751 0.00 191 - 138785 - 884100 -33751 0.00 191 - 138785 - 884100 -33751 0.00 191 - 138785 - 884100 -33751 0.00 191 - 138785 - 884200 -33751 0.00 191- 138785 - 884100 -33751 0.00 191- 138785 - 884200 -33751 0.00 16J2wAGE 67 AMT NET VCHR DISC 422.53 0.00 236.16 0.00 219.29 0.00 682.26 0.00 428.31 0.00 95.24 0.00 9.57- 0.00 957.70 0.00 24.97 0.00 47.36 0.00 1,090.50 0.00 35.00 0.00 196.86 0.00 35.00 0.00 831.83 0.00 35.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 422.53 236.16 219.29 682.26 428.31 95.24 9.57- 957.70 24.97 47.36 1.090.50 35.00 196.86 35.00 831.83 35.00 6,909.45 CHECK NO 569598 VENDOR 193150 - HYDRANAUTICS FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 2AGE 68 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 569782 VENDOR 314010 - HORSESHOE DEVELOPMENT L.C. 20012430 FEB 2002 101 - 163610 - 644100 -00000 0.00 13,058.50 0.00 13,058.50 FEB 2002 200495 20012564 FEB 2002 001. 172910 - 644100.00000 0.00 5,697.49 0.00 5,697.49 FEB 2002 201506 20012566 FEB 2002 101 - 163612 - 644100 -00000 0.00 4,240.77 0.00 4,240.77 FEB 2002 200520 20012570 FEB 2002 408 - 210151. 644100 -00000 0.00 4,968.40 473 - 173413. 644100 -00000 0.00 4,968.40 0.00 9,936.80 FEB 2002 200598 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 32,933.56 CHECK NO 569718 VENDOR 279710 - HORVATH ELECTRIC MOTORS 20012708 0886 408 - 253212- 634999 -00000 0.00 2,064.34 0.00 2,064.34 200230 PARTS SEVMOTORS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,064.34 CHECK NO 569906 VENDOR 351090 - HUCKLEBERRY ASSOCIATES, INC. 20013074 RENEW NOTARY E KERSKIE 001 - 122310 - 645490 -00000 0.00 111.00 0.00 111.00 153629 RENEWAL NOTARY E KERSKIE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 111.00 CHECK NO 569814 VENDOR 327650 - HUMAN RESOURCES ASSOCIATION OF 20012914 MEMBERSHIP D JANSON 2002 408- 210111. 654210 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 152262 2002 MEMBERSHIP D JANSON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 30.00 CHECK NO 569755 VENDOR 296660 - HUMANE SOCIETY OF COLLIER CO INC 20013025 019412 J WILLIAMS 610. 155410 - 631970.00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 201018 019412 J WILLIAMS 20013025 019513 T ROESER 610. 155410- 631970.00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 75.00 201018 T ROESER 019513 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 150.00 CHECK NO 569598 VENDOR 193150 - HYDRANAUTICS 6JI GE 69 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20013029 10007446 408 - 253221 - 649990 -00000 0.00 400.00 0.00 150270 ELEMENT AUTOPSY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569404 VENDOR 9020 HYDRAULIC HOSE AND EQUIP 20013042 097324 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 89.32 0.00 202312 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569889 VENDOR 348900 IFAS COMMUNICATION SERVICES 20012692 07818 001 - 157110 - 651110 -00000 0.00 90.00 0.00 153348 ENVELOPES AND NOTECARDS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569642 VENDOR 234180 IKON OFFICE SOLUTIONS 20013032 12599591 001 - 432020 - 646710 -00000 0.00 130.69 0.00 202381 111 -211 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569850 VENDOR 339830 IKON /IOS CAPITAL 20013033 53861893 113 - 138931. 644600 -00000 0.00 400.15 0.00 202545 1/26 -2/25 20013031 53863274 101 - 163612 - 644620 -00000 0.00 262.82 0.00 200491 1/23 -2/22 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569773 VENDOR 310350 IMAGE ONE 20013052 38328 12/21 490 - 144610 - 764990 -00000 0.00 22,239.80 0.00 202961 12/21 20013052 38329 12/21 490 - 144610 - 764990 -00000 0.00 2.200.00 0.00 202961 12121 20013052 388330 12/21 490 - 144610 - 764990.00000 0.00 100.00 0.00 202961 12/21 20013052 68665 12/27 490 - 144610 - 764990.00000 0.00 1,850.00 0.00 202961 12/27 CHECK NO 569623 VENDOR 214770 - IMMOKALEE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 20012688 176 DUES ROBERTS RANCH MU 198 - 157440 - 654210 -00000 0.00 125.00 0.00 125.00 151781 DUES ROBERTS RANCH MUSEUM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 125.00 CHECK NO 569405 VENDOR 9180 IMMOKALEE DISPOSAL CO FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 20013041 84 11/1 -12/31 1 6 J 2 AGE 70 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 1,640.00 202904 11 /1 -12/31 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 0.00 1,640.00 CHECK NO VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013052 38334 12/27 490 - 144610 - 764990 -00000 0.00 7,400.00- 0.00 7,400.00- 202961 12/27 2111160500 12/11.1/8 20012293 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 18,989.80 CHECK NO 569853 VENDOR 341540 - IMMOKALEE AIR & APPLIANCE COMPANY 43.33 1140010200 12/7 -1/7 200255 20012999 1655 191 - 138785 - 884200 -33751 0.00 3,500.00 0.00 3,500.00 203558 CARDENAS #60205000405 0.00 62.56 0.00 62.56 1140010100 12/7 -1/7 200255 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,500.00 CHECK NO 569623 VENDOR 214770 - IMMOKALEE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 20012688 176 DUES ROBERTS RANCH MU 198 - 157440 - 654210 -00000 0.00 125.00 0.00 125.00 151781 DUES ROBERTS RANCH MUSEUM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 125.00 CHECK NO 569405 VENDOR 9180 IMMOKALEE DISPOSAL CO 20013041 84 11/1 -12/31 111 - 163646 - 643300 -00000 0.00 1,640.00 0.00 1,640.00 202904 11 /1 -12/31 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,640.00 CHECK NO 569529 VENDOR 147920 IMMOKALEE WATER & SEWER DISTRICT 20012291 2111160500 12/11 -1/8 111 - 156334 - 643400.00000 0.00 554.61 0.00 554.61 2111160500 12/11.1/8 20012293 1140010200 12/7 -1/7 495 - 192330. 643400 -00000 0.00 43.33 0.00 43.33 1140010200 12/7 -1/7 200255 20012293 1140010100 12/7 -1/7 495 - 192330. 643400 -00000 0.00 62.56 0.00 62.56 1140010100 12/7 -1/7 200255 20012293 1140010500 12/7 -1/7 495 - 192330 - 643400 -00000 0.00 24.76 0.00 24.76 1140010500 12/7 -1/7 200255 20012291 2126066400 12/18 -1 /11 111. 156334- 643400.00000 0.00 87.41 0.00 87.41 2126066400 12/18.1/11 20012291 2126060700 12/18.1/11 111- 156334 - 643400.00000 0.00 7.97 0.00 7.97 2126060700 12/18 -1 /11 20013028 1130010200 11/30 -1/2 101- 163620 - 643100 -00000 0.00 111.84 0.00 111.84 1130010200 11/30 -1/2 20013028 2111160100 12/11 -1/18 101 - 163620 - 643100 -00000 0.00 228.87 0.00 228.87 2111160100 12/11 -1/18 Fl 6J2AGE 71 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012291 2104011800 12/20 -1/18 111. 156334- 643400 -00000 0.00 10.05 0.00 2104011800 12/20 -1/18 20013030 2126065400 12120.1118 001 - 122370 - 643400 -00000 0.00 7.97 0.00 2126065400 12/20 -1/18 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569406 VENDOR 9270 INDUSTRIAL AIR PRODUCTS 20013040 114303 1/3/02 408. 233352- 652910 -00000 0.00 23.30 0.00 202418 1/3 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569556 VENDOR 164780 INFO PLUS 20013038 20021 12/31 111 - 156341 - 634999.00000 0.00 374.00 0.00 201384 12/31 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569890 VENDOR 349150 INNOVATIVE TECHNOLOGY INSTITUTES 20013072 3110 521 - 122410- 654360 -00000 0.00 606.00 0.00 COUPOONS /TRAINING CLASSES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569634 VENDOR 228980 - INSTRUMENT SPECIALTIES INC. 20013037 20468 412 - 273511 - 646510.70881 0.00 212.00 0.00 101865 TEST CALABRATION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569486 VENDOR 115600 - INSURANCE AND RISK MANAGEMENT SERV. 20012691 13900 516 - 121650 - 645910 -00000 0.00 101.00 0.00 153360 BOND FOR FRED W COYLE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569746 VENDOR 290590 - INTELITRAN 20012918 PRGG DEC O1 130 - 157710 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,080.00 0.00 202925 DEC O1 20012919 PRI 1201 DEC O1 111 - 156343. 634999 -00000 0.00 1.080.00 0.00 202926 DEC O1 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 72 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012917 PRV1201 DEC O1 111 - 156380 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,080.00 0.00 1,080.00 202922 DEC 2001 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,240.00 CHECK NO 569780 VENDOR 313840 - IOSCAPITAL 20013035 53596251 681 - 421510. 644620 -00000 0.00 232.70 0.00 232.70 201963 12/29 -1/28 20013036 53861889 681.431310- 644620 -00000 0.00 395.23 0.00 395.23 201965 1/26 -2/25 20013031 53874056 681- 410710 - 644620 -00000 0.00 280.80 0.00 280.80 201338 1/27 -2/26 20013027 53727635 1/15 -2/14 681 - 421510 - 644620.00000 0.00 311.69 0.00 311.69 201963 1/15 -2/14 20013027 53358779 11/29 -12/28 681 - 421510 - 644620 -00000 0.00 242.25 0.00 242.25 201963 11/29 -12/28 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,462.67 CHECK NO 569554 VENDOR 163520 J. DANIEL LABS, M.D. 20012546 J AVILES 12/21 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 58.50 0.00 58.50 153393 J AVILES 12121 20012546 J AVILES 12/26 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 58.50 0.00 58.50 153393 J AVILES 12/26 20012546 J AVILES 12/27 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 19.50 0.00 19.50 153393 J AVILES 12/27 20012546 J AVILES 12120 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 51.35 0.00 51.35 153393 J AVILES 12/20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 187.85 CHECK NO 569639 VENDOR 231810 J. M. TODD COMPANY 20012490 70196 408- 253212 - 651210 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 200282 1/6 -2/5 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20.00 CHECK NO 569839 VENDOR 336570 J.A. WEBSTER, INC. 20012950 1115552 001 - 155410 - 652910 -00000 0.00 21.75 0.00 21.75 153363 MASKS 6J2AGE 73 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569517 VENDOR 139990 - J.C. DRAINFIELD 20013010 5567 408- 233351 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,050.00 0.00 201107 SVS 20013010 4704 408 - 233351 - 634999 -00000 0.00 750.00 0.00 201107 SVS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569638 VENDOR 231020 J.M. TODD COMPANY 20012477 71153 101 - 163620 - 764360 -00000 0.00 975.00 0.00 203940 FAX CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569407 VENDOR 9540 JACK AND ANN'S FEED 20012489 67419 495 - 192330 - 652990 -00000 0.00 28.01 0.00 201985 SUPPLIES 20012488 66700 001. 122240- 652990 -00000 0.00 3.09 0.00 201287 SUPPLIES 20012488 66699 001 - 122240 - 652990.00000 0.00 7.18 0.00 201287 SUPPLIES 20012489 67425 495 - 192330 - 652990 -00000 0.00 9.86 0.00 201985 SUPPLIES 20012489 67494 495 - 192330 - 652990 -00000 0.00 9.17 0.00 201985 SUPPLIES 20012540 67080 001 - 155410 - 652990 -00000 0.00 19.87 0.00 153092 SUPPLIES 20012487 66924 101 - 163620. 652990 -00000 0.00 3.99 0.00 200955 SUPPLIES 20012489 67288 495 - 192330 - 652990 -00000 0.00 2.78 0.00 201985 SUPPLIES 20012487 66990 101 - 163620 - 652990 -00000 0.00 10.95 0.00 200955 SUPPLIES 20012489 67158 495 - 192330 - 652990 -00000 0.00 8.10 0.00 201985 SUPPLIES FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 16J2AGE 74 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 103.00 CHECK NO 569540 VENDOR 156680 JACK LYONS TRUCK PARTS, INC. 20012547 147178 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 20.76 0.00 20.76 200865 PARTS 20012541 147914 521 - 122410.646425 -00000 0.00 504.82 0.00 504.82 200865 PARTS 20012541 147851 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 372.75 0.00 372.75 200865 PARTS 20012541 148039 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 585.00 0.00 585.00 200865 PARTS 20012541 147915 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 65.13 0.00 65.13 200865 PARTS 20012547 147593 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 76.81 0.00 76.81 200865 PARTS 20012547 147372 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 48.07 0.00 48.07 200865 PARTS 20012547 147006 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 120.00- 0.00 120.00- 200865 PARTS 20012547 147680 521.122410- 646425.00000 0.00 23.12 0.00 23.12 200865 PARTS 20012548 148091 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 20.76- 0.00 20.76- 200865 PARTS 20012541 148072 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 353.58 0.00 353.58 200865 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,909.28 CHECK NO 569915 VENDOR 900030 JAMES MUDD 301196 8/17 -24 PASSPORT J MUDD 470 - 173410 - 640300 -00000 0.00 100.90 0.00 100.90 8/17 -24 PASSPORT REIMB J MUDD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.90 CHECK NO 569489 VENDOR 116700 - JAMESON SUPPLY INC. 20012485 75398 001.122240- 652995 -00000 0.00 31.92 0.00 31.92 201286 PARTS FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012485 75394 201286 PARTS 20012485 75314 201286 PARTS 20012485 75316 201286 PARTS 20012485 75321 201286 PARTS 20012485 75265 201286 PARTS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 122240 - 652995 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240. 652995 -00000 0.00 001. 122240 - 652995 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 652995 -00000 0.00 001 - 122240 - 652995 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569908 VENDOR 351130 - JANE M. MC DONALD 20012598 1/14 -18 TRVL J MCDONALD 301 - 121125 - 640300 -01017 0.00 1/14 -18 TRVL J MCDONALD CHECK NO 569408 VENDOR 9920 - JEFFREY MCCARTNEY, M.D. P.A. 20012545 B DRILICH 12/21 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 153394 B DRILICH 12/21 20012545 L BRADBURY 12111 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 153394 L BRADBURY 12/11 CHECK NO 569813 VENDOR 327630 - JIM & SLIM'S TOOL SUPPLY 20012522 686964 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 521 - 122410 - 641950 -00000 0.00 150498 LO SIDE BOX CHECK NO 569750 VENDOR 292620 - JM TODD, INC. 20013346 65042 001 - 121140 - 634999 -00000 0.00 152989 10/8.11/7 20013346 68740 001 - 121140- 634999.00000 0.00 152989 12/8 -1/7 16J2AGE 75 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 24.95 0.00 24.95 119.41 0.00 119.41 66.99 0.00 66.99 4.50 0.00 4.50 84.20 0.00 84.20 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 331.97 37.00 0.00 37.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 37.00 144.43 0.00 144.43 165.57 0.00 165.57 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 310.00 598.00 48.23 0.00 646.23 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 646.23 45.00 0.00 45.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 6J2AGE 76 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20013346 67530 001 - 121140 - 634999 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 152989 11/8.12/7 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569919 VENDOR 900050 JOAN INSEL 301194 REFUND PARKS - INSEL 111 - 156380. 347990 -00000 0.00 50.00 0.00 INSEL REFUND PARKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569409 VENDOR 10160 JOHN COLLINS AUTO PARTS, INC. 20012486 748411 408 - 253221 - 652990 -00000 0.00 32.28 0.00 201056 PARTS 20012486 749012 408. 253221 - 652990 -00000 0.00 164.93 0.00 201056 PARTS 20012551 706578 109 - 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 48.31 0.00 200146 SUPPLIES 20012552 748143 109 - 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 16.88 0.00 200146 SUPPLIES 20012550 747427 109 - 182901 - 652990 -00000 0.00 35.46 0.00 200146 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569660 VENDOR 249800 JOHN DEERE CO. 20012944 05 -62663 001 - 156363 - 764990 -00000 0.00 19,205.10 0.00 202672 TRACTOR 20013047 05 -61878 111 - 163647. 764990 -00000 0.00 22.937.76 0.00 201750 MOWER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569884 VENDOR 348490 - JOHN DEERE LANDSCAPES 20012951 980959 109 - 182901- 646311.00000 0.00 158.32 0.00 203343 PARTS /DISC 20012492 972055 150 - 162545. 646311 -00000 0.00 18.85 0.00 203427 PARTS /DISC 20012543 979049 408 - 253212. 655100 -00000 0.00 0.30- 0.00 203445 PARTS /DISC FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2 AGE 77 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012492 972055 150 - 162545 - 646311 -00000 0.00 0.38- 0.00 0.38- 203427 PARTS /DISC 20012491 980943 111 - 163646 - 646311 -00000 0.00 230.74 0.00 230.74 203372 PARTS /DISC 20012952 966986 109 - 182901- 646311 -00000 0.00 208.66 0.00 208.66 203343 PARTS /DISC 20012543 979049 408 - 253212. 655100.00000 0.00 14.83 0.00 14.83 203445 PARTS /DISC 20012492 864408 150 - 162545 - 646311 -00000 0.00 8.05 0.00 8.05 203427 PARTS /DISC 20012954 983232 109 - 182901 - 646311 -00000 0.00 94.41 0.00 94.41 203343 PARTS /DISC 20012953 965706 -2 109 - 182901 - 646311 -00000 0.00 40.52 0.00 40.52 203343 PARTS /DISC 20012954 983232 109 - 182901 - 646311 -00000 0.00 1.89- 0.00 1.89- 203343 PARTS /DISC 20012951 980959 109. 182901- 646311 -00000 0.00 3.17- 0.00 3.17- 203343 PARTS /DISC 20012949 975549 111 - 163646 - 646311 -00000 0.00 62.18 0.00 62.18 203372 PARTS /DISC 20012491 980943 111 - 163646- 646311.00000 0.00 4.61- 0.00 4.61- 203372 PARTS /DISC 20012953 965706 -2 109 - 182901 - 646311 -00000 0.00 0.81- 0.00 0.81- 203343 PARTS /DISC 20012949 975549 111 - 163646 - 646311 -00000 0.00 1.24- 0.00 1.24- 203372 PARTS /DISC 20012952 966986 109 - 182901 - 646311 -00000 0.00 4.17- 0.00 4.17- 203343 PARTS /DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 819.99 CHECK NO 569601 VENDOR 193480 JONES CHEMICAL 20012542 90962 408 - 253221- 652310.00000 0.00 3,198.30 0.00 3,198.30 202571 CAUSTIC SODA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,198.30 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 78 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 569818 VENDOR 329500 JUDGE FRANKLIN BAKER 20012959 1/20 -26 TRVL F BAKER 001. 421060 - 640300 -00000 0.00 716.73 0.00 716.73 1/20 -26 TRVL F BAKER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 716.73 CHECK NO 569882 VENDOR 348470 KATHERINE WHITTIER 20013057 1/9 -31 TRVL K WHITTIER 111 - 156310 - 640200 -00000 0.00 17.40 0.00 17.40 1/9 -31 TRVL K WHITTIER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 17.40 CHECK NO 569410 VENDOR 10690 - KELLY BLUEPRINTERS 20012493 7752 113 - 138312 - 651210 -00000 0.00 19.05 0.00 19.05 200473 COPIES 20012493 8091 113. 138312- 651210 -00000 0.00 52.84 0.00 52.84 200473 COPIES 20012493 8641 113. 138312 - 651210 -00000 0.00 79.26 0.00 79.26 200473 COPIES 20012493 8424 113. 138312- 651210 -00000 0.00 277.41 0.00 277.41 200473 COPIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 428.56 CHECK NO 569603 VENDOR 194110 KILPATRICK TURF EQUIPMENT 20012495 2623800 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 151.18 0.00 151.18 202174 PARTS 20012494 2181201 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 33.99 0.00 33.99 202174 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 185.17 CHECK NO 569411 VENDOR 10890 - KRAFT CONSTRUCTION 20010522 #12 355 - 156175- 762200.80259 0.00 545.360.85 0.00 545,360.85 102846 TO 12/25/01 20010522 #12 RETAINAGE 355 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 51,297.36- 0.00 51,297.36- 102846 TO 12/25/01 RETAINAGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 494,063.49 it 6J2AGE 79 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 569873 VENDOR 345830 - KRAMES STAYWELL 20013002 2255441 517 - 121640 - 651210 -00000 0.00 105.47 517 - 121640 - 641950 -00000 0.00 36.25 0.00 153439 HEALTH BROCHURES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569582 VENDOR 179430 KYLE CONSTRUCTION, INC. 20012946 22 -8 408. 253221- 634999 -00000 0.00 16,113.63 0.00 203978 REPAIRS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569523 VENDOR 143770 LANDAUER INC. 20012496 3136165 313. 163611- 631990 -00000 0.00 214.50 0.00 201645 SVS /CR 20012496 3112036 313 - 163611 - 631990.00000 0.00 49.50- 0.00 201645 SVS /CR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569768 VENDOR 305820 - LANDMARK AUDIOBOOKS 20012520 90347 307 - 156110 - 652650.00000 0.00 64.00 0.00 153455 AUDIOBOOKS 20012520 90346 307- 156110. 652650 -00000 0.00 150.00 0.00 153455 AUDIOBOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569920 VENDOR 900050 LAURA EVELAND 301193 REFUND PARKS - EVELAND 111 - 156380. 347990 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 EVELAND REFUND PARKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569817 VENDOR 329400 LAWSON PRODUCTS, INC. 20012497 8852792 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 90.55 0.00 203633 PARTS 20012497 8852793 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 336.43 0.00 203633 PARTS FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 16J2AGE 80 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 426.98 CHECK NO 569412 VENDOR 11110 - LEE CO ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE 20013050 20195 - 114172 12/18 -1/18 001 - 156160 - 643100 -00000 0.00 1,861.74 0.00 1,861.74 20195 - 114172 12/18 -1/18 20013050 20195 - 153415 12/27 -1/25 111 - 163646- 643100 -00000 0.00 5.13 0.00 5.13 20195 - 153415 12/27 -1/25 20013050 20195 - 154732 1/23 111 - 156334 - 643100 -00000 0.00 5,770.55 0.00 5,770.55 20195. 154732 1/23 20013050 20195 - 154733 1/18 760 - 162711 - 643100 -00000 0.00 3.913.34 0.00 3,913.34 20195 - 154733 1/18 20013050 20195 - 153068 1/25 111. 156334 - 643100 -00000 0.00 26.42 0.00 26.42 20195 - 153068 1/25 20013050 20195- 154735 1/29 001 - 156363 - 643100.00000 0.00 899.94 0.00 899.94 20195. 154735 1/29 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 12,477.12 CHECK NO 569728 VENDOR 283250 LEHIGH SAFETY SHOES 20012523 636752 101 - 163620 - 652140 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 200951 SAFETY SHOES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.00 CHECK NO 569413 VENDOR 11240 LEO'S SOD & LANDSCAPING 20013021 7292 408 - 253212 - 646314 -00000 0.00 79.80 0.00 79.80 201993 SOD 20012480 7299 111 - 156332 - 646314 -00000 0.00 2,280.00 0.00 2,280.00 204035 SOD 20012498 7154 408 - 253212. 646314 -00000 0.00 79.80 0.00 79.80 201993 SOD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,439.60 CHECK NO 569465 VENDOR 105260 - LESCO SERVICE CENTER 20012479 2B2AYZ 111 - 156332 - 652310 -00000 0.00 2,436.00 0.00 2,436.00 201154 CHEMICALS /CR 20012549 2B2C95 109 - 182901 - 652990.00000 0.00 172.40 0.00 172.40 200096 PARTS 6J2AGE 81 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012479 CM2B2CA8 111 - 156332 - 652310 -00000 0.00 156.00- 0.00 201154 CHEMICALS /CR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569858 VENDOR 342930 - LIDDY S. GREEN 20013321 TUITION REIMB GREEN 8/01 490. 144610- 654310 -00000 0.00 201.76 0.00 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT GREEN 8/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569860 VENDOR 343480 - LILIANA CARRENDER 20012867 1117102 3.5 HRS L.CARREND 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 45.50 0.00 1/17/02 3.5 HRS L.CARRENDER 20013110 1/24 3.5 HRS 681. 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 45.50 0.00 CARRENDER 1/24 3.5 HRS 20013110 1122 5 HRS 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 65.00 0.00 CARRENDER 1122 5 HRS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569836 VENDOR 335680 - LORI S WALLACE 20012596 12/8 -28 TRVL L WALLACE 681 - 421510 - 640200 -00000 0.00 23.20 0.00 12/8 -28 TRVL L WALLACE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569597 VENDOR 193100 - LORMAN EDUCATION SERVICES 20012061 REIST J HUBBARD 2112 001- 010510 - 654360 -00000 0.00 269.00 0.00 153314 REG.J.HUBBARD 2112 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569627 VENDOR 217720 - LOUISE HARDY 20013055 12/12,1/18 TRVL L HARDY 111 - 156310 - 640200 -00000 0.00 6.96 0.00 12/12,1/18 TRVL L HARDY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569719 VENDOR 280450 - LUMEC, INC 20013046 66377 156 - 162723 - 646451 -00000 0.00 5,695.00 0.00 202130 PARTS 6J2AGE 82 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012996 66376 156 - 162723.646451 -00000 0.00 2,350.00 0.00 203061 REPLACE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569826 VENDOR 332820 LYNN CLARKE 20013056 1/14 -30 TRVL L CLARKE 111 - 156425.640200 -00000 0.00 24.94 0.00 1/14 -30 TRVL L CLARKE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569863 VENDOR 343930 M /A -COM RADIO SYSTEMS 20012947 0860066 408- 253212 - 646610 -00000 0.00 175.00 0.00 204129 INSTALL RADIOS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569531 VENDOR 148960 MAC TOOLS 20013003 53005 521. 122410 - 652910 -00000 0.00 186.90 0.00 153469 PRO SUPER TORCH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569730 VENDOR 284640 MAGUIRE ASSOCIATES OF VIRGINIA, INC 20012945 4721 001 - 101520 - 631700.00000 0.00 9,500.00 0.00 200967 SVS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569887 VENDOR 348640 MANIFEST FUNDING SERVICES 20013007 105838157 101 - 163612 - 644650 -00000 0.00 705.52 0.00 203435 LEASE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569462 VENDOR 100800 MANPOWER TEMPORARY SERVICES 20012998 56221493 495 - 192370 - 634999 -00000 0.00 87.84 0.00 204155 TEMPS 20012998 56224952 495 - 192370 - 634999 -00000 0.00 642.33 0.00 204155 TEMPS 20012998 56225775 495 - 192370 - 634999 -00000 0.00 356.85 0.00 204155 TEMPS FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20013009 30040537 200076 TEMP 20012998 56225671 204155 TEMPS 20013009 30037047 200076 TEMP 20012530 30037049 202695 TEMP 20012998 56225954 204155 TEMPS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 126334. 646311 -00000 0.00 495. 192370 - 634999 -00000 0.00 001 - 126334 - 646311 -00000 0.00 408 - 210105 - 634999 -00000 0.00 495. 192370- 634999 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569497 VENDOR 127090 MARCO OFFICE SUPPLY 20013013 112260614 408 - 210151 - 651110 -00000 102.40 200860 SUPPLIES 310.19 20013012 112200598 113. 138930- 651110 -00000 0.00 200276 TONER 86.10 20013017 110250655 681 - 410710 - 651110 -00000 866.18 201339 SUPPLIES 66.72 20013019 112200586 408 - 233351 - 651110 -00000 203442 SUPPLIES 20013018 112200624 101 - 163612 - 651110 -00000 126. 138332 - 651110 -33202 203378 SUPPLIES 20013018 112200623 101 - 163612 - 651110 -00000 126 - 138332 - 651110 -33202 203378 SUPPLIES 20013014 111160671 001 - 156110 - 651110 -00000 200947 SUPPLIES 20013011 201070678 113 - 138900. 651110 -00000 200139 PAPER 20013020 201070529 001 - 172910. 651110 -00000 203773 PAPER 20013008 201020684 111 - 138911- 651110 -00000 201427 TONER /PAPER 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16J2AGE 83 AMT NET VCHR DISC 520.00 0.00 348.62 0.00 520.00 0.00 102.40 0.00 310.19 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 478.06 0.00 189.23 0.00 97.12 0.00 246.59 0.00 23.99 23.99 0.00 0.00 86.10 0.00 858.00 0.00 866.18 0.00 66.72 0.00 189.23 0.00 VCHR NET 520.00 348.62 520.00 102.40 310.19 2,888.23 478.06 189.23 97.12 246.59 47.98 86.10 858.00 866.18 66.72 189.23 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20013015 109240667 201332 CREDIT 20013016 109190699 201337 SUPPLIES 20013008 201020694 201427 TONER /PAPER COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA J ZAGE 84 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 681 - 431310 - 651110 -00000 0.00 21.14- 0.00 681 - 410510 - 651110 -00000 0.00 475.28 0.00 111 - 138911 - 651110 -00000 0.00 4.25 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569495 VENDOR 124890 - MARCO RIVER MARINA, INC 20012524 161091 001. 156363 - 652110 -00000 0.00 202150 UNIFORMS CHECK NO 569415 VENDOR 12070 - MARCO TRUE VALUE, INC. 20012525 276227 470 - 173442 - 652990 -00000 0.00 201215 SUPPLIES CHECK NO 569416 VENDOR 12100 - MARCO VETERINARIAN HOSPITAL 20012544 01 -9179 BAKER 610 - 155410 - 631970.00000 0.00 201037 BAKER 01 -9179 CHECK NO 569494 VENDOR 122850 - MARIA G. DELASHMET CHECK TOTAL 20013111 1/25 5 HRS 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 13.77 DELASHMET 1/25 HRS 0.00 13.77 20012538 1/17/02 5.5 HRS 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 0.00 45.00 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 80.00 DELASHMET 5.5 HRS 1/17/02 20013111 1/18 2.5 HRS 681- 421190. 634402.00000 0.00 0.00 DELASHMET 1/18 2.5 HRS 56.00 0.00 20013111 1/28 3.5 HRS 681- 421190. 634402 -00000 0.00 DELASHMET 1/28 3.5 HRS 20013024 01 -2322 4/6/01 681 - 431590. 634402 -00000 0.00 DELASHMET 01 -2322 4/6/01 VCHR NET 21.14- 475.28 4.25 3,583.60 949.00 0.00 949.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 949.00 13.77 0.00 13.77 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 13.77 45.00 0.00 45.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 45.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 16.00 72.00 0.00 88.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 56.00 0.00 56.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20013111 1/24 4.5 HRS DELASHMET 1/24 4.5 HRS 20013111 1/28 1.5 HRS DELASHMET 1/28 1.5 HRS 20013111 1122 4.5 HRS DELASHMET 1122 4.5 HRS 20013111 1/23 4.5 HRS DELASHMET 1/23 4.5HRS 20013111 1/25 2.5 HRS DELASHMET 1/25 2.5 HRS 20013024 01 -4930 5/4/01 DELASHMET 01 -4930 5/4/01 20013111 1/22 1.5 HRS DELASHMET 1/22 1.5 HRS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 681. 431590- 634402 -00000 0.00 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 681. 431590- 634402 -00000 0.00 681 - 431590- 634402 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569685 VENDOR 261580 - MARK MIDDLEBROOK 20012715 1121 -22 TRVL M MIDDLEBROO 681 - 421510 - 640300 -00000 0.00 1/21 -22 TRVL M MIDDLEBROOK CHECK NO 569615 VENDOR 204680 - MARKING DEVICES 20012526 86788 001 - 000000- 142900.00000 0.00 200058 BORDER STAMPS CHECK NO 569547 VENDOR 160610 - MARY ELLEN DONNER 20013265 1/4 -31 TRVL M DONNER 111 - 156313 - 640200 -00000 0.00 1/4 -31 TRVL M DONNER CHECK NO 569414 VENDOR 11700 - MATULAYS CONTRACTORS SUPPLY 20012499 42239 101 - 163620 - 652990 -00000 0.00 153321 EQUIP 16J2AGE 85 AMT NET VCHR DISC 72.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 72.00 0.00 72.00 0.00 40.00 0.00 16.00 0.00 24.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 21.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 34.05 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 26.10 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 251.50 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 72.00 24.00 72.00 72.00 40.00 16.00 24.00 600.00 21.00 21.00 34.05 34.05 26.10 26.10 251.50 251.50 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 86 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 569420 VENDOR 12200 MCCONNELLS TRUE VALUE HARDWARE 20012506 164776 111 - 156332 - 652990.00000 0.00 1.52 0.00 1.52 200983 SUPPLIES 20012505 164885 001 - 156363 - 652990 -00000 0.00 21.84 0.00 21.84 200873 SUPPLIES 20012506 165134 111 - 156332. 652990 -00000 0.00 25.15 0.00 25.15 200983 SUPPLIES 20012506 164907 111. 156332- 652990 -00000 0.00 40.93 0.00 40.93 200983 SUPPLIES 20012503 164861 408 - 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 21.60 0.00 21.60 200792 SUPPLIES 20012506 164870 111- 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 21.98 0.00 21.98 200983 SUPPLIES 20012501 164800 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 5.44 0.00 5.44 200634 SUPPLIES 20012500 165016 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 30.14 0.00 30.14 200634 SUPPLES 20012505 164831 001 - 156363 - 652990.00000 0.00 28.02 0.00 28.02 200873 SUPPLIES 20012500 164926 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 10.75 0.00 10.75 200634 SUPPLES 20012506 164859 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 12.04 0.00 12.04 200983 SUPPLIES 20012507 164801 001 - 155410 - 652990 -00000 0.00 27.23 001 - 155410 - 652910 -00000 0.00 20.03 0.00 47.26 201388 SUPPLIES 20012506 164832 111 - 156332 - 652910.00000 0.00 16.73 0.00 16.73 200983 SUPPLIES 20012505 164860 001 - 156363 - 652990 -00000 0.00 10.59 0.00 10.59 200873 SUPPLIES 20012503 164875 408 - 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 234.60 0.00 234.60 200792 SUPPLIES 20012506 164832 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 4.62 0.00 4.62 200983 SUPPLIES FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 87 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012504 164863 408 - 233351 - 652910 -00000 0.00 95.32 0.00 95.32 200794 SUPPLIES 20012500 164975 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 10.75 0.00 10.75 200634 SUPPLES 20012501 164793 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 8.09 0.00 8.09 200634 SUPPLIES 20012506 164776 111. 156332- 652910.00000 0.00 55.67 0.00 55.67 200983 SUPPLIES 20012506 164963 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 4.56 0.00 4.56 200983 SUPPLIES 20012501 164836 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 1.25 0.00 1.25 200634 SUPPLIES 20012503 165059 408- 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 21.59 0.00 21.59 200792 SUPPLIES 20012507 164943 001 - 155410 - 652990 -00000 0.00 28.75 0.00 28.75 201388 SUPPLIES 20012502 164835 408 - 233352 - 652910 -00000 0.00 17.43 0.00 17.43 200716 SUPPLIES 20012502 165042 408 - 233352 - 652910 -00000 0.00 53.72 0.00 53.72 200716 SUPPLIES 20012503 165010 408- 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 27.33 0.00 27.33 200792 SUPPLIES 20012504 164879 408 - 233351 - 652910 -00000 0.00 26.99 0.00 26.99 200794 SUPPLIES 20012501 164586 521 - 122410 - 646425.00000 0.00 8.37 0.00 8.37 200634 SUPPLIES 20012502 164915 408 - 233352 - 652910 -00000 0.00 83.16 0.00 83.16 200716 SUPPLIES 20012506 165053 111 - 156332. 652990 -00000 0.00 48.10 0.00 48.10 200983 SUPPLIES 20012506 165079 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 31.44 0.00 31.44 200983 SUPPLIES 20012505 165029 001 - 156363- 652990 -00000 0.00 31.95 0.00 31.95 200873 SUPPLIES FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 88 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012506 164822 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 43.15 0.00 43.15 200983 SUPPLIES 20012505 164871 001 - 156363 - 652990 -00000 0.00 8.08 0.00 8.08 200873 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,138.91 CHECK NO 569417 VENDOR 12140 MCGEE AND ASSOCIATES 20012531 LELY 200444.33 152. 162541 - 631403 -00000 0.00 530.00 0.00 530.00 200444 12101 20012537 PINE RIDGE 202383.38 111 - 163646 - 631403 -00000 0.00 777.50 0.00 777.50 202383 12101 20012534 US41 /A 202375.40 111 - 163646 - 631403 -00000 0.00 377.50 0.00 377.50 202375 12101 20012536 DAVIS /PH2 202379.37 111 - 163646 - 631403 -00000 0.00 332.50 0.00 332.50 202379 12101 20012533 IMM /GDLT 202369.36 111 - 163646 - 631403 -00000 0.00 540.00 0.00 540.00 202369 12101 20012535 DAVIS 202376.35 111 - 163646 - 631403.00000 0.00 230.00 0.00 230.00 202376 12101 20012532 IMM 200445.34 111 - 163646 - 631403 -00000 0.00 540.00 0.00 540.00 200445 12101 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,327.50 CHECK NO 569525 VENDOR 144810 MCMASTER -CARR 20012527 50272484 408 - 233352 - 652910 -00000 0.00 17.81 0.00 17.81 202421 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 17.81 CHECK NO 569812 VENDOR 327370 MEDICAL DEPARTMENT STORE 20012948 18048 490 - 144610- 652110 -00000 0.00 67.27 0.00 67.27 200117 UNIFORMS 20012948 18047 490 - 144610 - 652110 -00000 0.00 105.82 0.00 105.82 200117 UNIFORMS 20012948 18046 490 - 144610 - 652110 -00000 0.00 8.95 0.00 8.95 200117 UNIFORMS FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012948 18045 200117 UNIFORMS 20012948 17953 200117 UNIFORMS 20012948 17954 200117 UNIFORMS 20012948 17955 200117 UNIFORMS 20012948 17956 200117 UNIFORMS 20012948 18044 200117 UNIFORMS 20012948 18043 200117 UNIFORMS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 490. 144610- 652110 -00000 0.00 490 - 144610- 652110 -00000 0.00 490 - 144610. 652110 -00000 0.00 490 - 144610 - 652110 -00000 0.00 490. 144610- 652110 -00000 0.00 490 - 144610 - 652110 -00000 0.00 490 - 144610 - 652110 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569570 VENDOR 170800 - MEMPHIS EQUIPMENT 20012521 0056204 521 - 122410 - 646415 -00000 0.00 150499 REBUILD TURBOCHARGER CHECK NO 569614 VENDOR 204140 - METCALF & EDDY INC. 20013285 123483/123500 411 - 273511 - 631400 -70054 0.00 917436 THRU 8/24/01 CHECK NO 569888 VENDOR 348870 - MIAMI MICRO DATA 20012484 20580 411 - 273511 - 764950 -70075 0.00 203534 PRIMAVERA EXP V7.5 CHECK NO 569479 VENDOR 112550 - MICHAEL F. BEAL, ATTORNEY 20012943 R HERNANDEZ 01 -1652 681- 421190 - 634401.00000 0.00 R HERNANDEZ 01 -1652 16J2AGE 89 AMT NET VCHR DISC 29.16 0.00 7.50 0.00 105.82 0.00 8.95 0.00 58.32 0.00 47.50 0.00 50.25 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 819.17 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,379.67 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,125.00 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 34.60 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 29.16 7.50 105.82 8.95 58.32 47.50 50.25 489.54 819.17 819.17 1,379.67 1,379.67 2,125.00 2,125.00 34.60 34.60 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA VCHR NET REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 27.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 16.00 CHECK TOTAL FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 569916 VENDOR 900030 - MICHAEL SMYKOWSKI 0.00 301199 1/24 -25 TRVL M SMYKOWSKI 001 - 101520 - 640300 -00000 0.00 48.00 1/24 -25 TRVL M SMYKOWSKI 48.00 32.00 CHECK NO 569632 VENDOR 226460 MICHAEL W. PETTIT 0.00 20012712 1/17 -18 TRVL M PETTIT 001 - 010510 - 640300 -00000 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 1/17 -18 TRVL M PETTIT 256.00 61.69 CHECK NO 569800 VENDOR 323000 MICHELLE DORALUS 23.50 20013112 1/23 1.5 HR 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 180.95 DORALUS 1/23 1.5 HR 20013112 1/28 3 HR 681- 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 DORALUS 1/28 3 HRS 20013112 1122 .5 HR 681- 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 DORALUS 1/22 .5 HR 20013112 1/22 4 HRS 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 DORALUS 1/22 4 HRS 20013112 1/28 3 HRS 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 DORALUS 1/28 3 HRS 20012539 1/16 3 HRS 681 - 421190 - 634402 -00000 0.00 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 DORALUS 3 HRS 1/16 20013112 1/23 1 HR 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 DORALUS 1/23 1 HR CHECK NO 569675 VENDOR 256580 MINOLTA CORPORATION 20013000 B121461923 408 - 233312. 646710 -00000 0.00 202254 12/01 20013006 B121461932 001 - 155230. 646710 -00000 0.00 201536 12/01 20013001 C011412248 111 - 156349 - 646710 -00000 0.00 201722 01102 16J2AGE 90 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 27.00 0.00 27.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 27.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 16.00 24.00 0.00 24.00 48.00 0.00 48.00 8.00 0.00 8.00 64.00 0.00 64.00 48.00 0.00 48.00 32.00 16.00 0.00 48.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 256.00 61.69 0.00 61.69 23.50 0.00 23.50 180.95 0.00 180.95 6J2AGE 91 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20013000 C011412162 408 - 233312 - 646710 -00000 0.00 61.69 0.00 202254 01/02 20013006 0011412172 001 - 155230 - 646710 -00000 0.00 23.50 0.00 201536 1/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569797 VENDOR 321760 MINOTTI'S 20012529 PIZZA 10/19/01 130 - 157710. 652210 -00000 0.00 305.00 0.00 202898 PIZZA 10/19/01 20012529 PIZZA 11/16/01 130. 157710- 652210 -00000 0.00 343.00 0.00 202898 PIZZA 11/16/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569500 VENDOR 129260 MITCHELL & STARK CONSTRUCTION 20013048 2155 414. 263611 - 763100 -73916 0.00 14,200.00 0.00 203666 ALUM CHEM FEED EQUIP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569538 VENDOR 156390 MOCK ENGINEERING INC. 20013023 22441 408 - 253250 - 634999 -00000 0.00 90.00 0.00 150611 LABOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569589 VENDOR 183670 MOODY'S INVESTOR SERVICE 20013049 F1372259 -000 210- 939030 - 873820.00000 0.00 18,000.00 0.00 SERIES 2002 REV BONDS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569792 VENDOR 319710 MOWERS INC 20012528 32091 408- 233351 - 646970.00000 0.00 22.77 0.00 203874 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569487 VENDOR 115710 MR JAMES NOE II TRUST 20012553 FEB 2002 SHERIFF 001 - 061010. 644100 -00000 0.00 4,492.99 0.00 FEB 2002 201888 6J2 AGE 92 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569421 VENDOR 13030 - NAPLES AIRPORT AUTHORITY 20012569 FEB 2002 COLL15 470 - 173441. 644100.00000 0.00 2.024.00 0.00 FEB 2002 201214 20012554 FEB 2002 COLL11 001. 144510 - 644100 -00000 0.00 572.40 0.00 FEB 2002 200560 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569422 VENDOR 13070 - NAPLES AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE 20013076 150986 001 - 100110 - 654370 -00000 0.00 2,500.00 0.00 204058 T OLLIFF CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569423 VENDOR 13080 NAPLES ARMATURE WORKS 20012623 63332 001 - 172930 - 652990 -00000 0.00 209.23 0.00 150296 -VALVE REPAIR KITS & HOSE MEND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569424 VENDOR 13120 - NAPLES AWARDS COMPANY 20012979 2916 001- 155410 - 652990 -00000 0.00 12.50 0.00 153467 - CUSTOM BRASS MAGNETIC TAG CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569425 VENDOR 13200 NAPLES CAR WASH 20012965 CAR WASHES F /DEC,01 521 - 122410 - 646415.00000 0.00 562.70 0.00 200961 - 61 WASHES, 1 DETAIL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569427 VENDOR 13230 NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 20013258 SYBERT,P - 1211101 001 - 155930. 634101 -00000 0.00 227.23 0.00 201864 - SYBERT, 12/1 20012601 HAYWARD,T - 9/15/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 724.59 0.00 201864 - HAYWARD, 9/15 20012601 HAYWARD,T - 9/17/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 396.22 0.00 201864 - HAYWARD, 9/17 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 93 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013258 HAMPSON,A - 12/1/01 001- 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 362.25 0.00 362.25 201864 - HAMPSON, 1211 20012601 SYBERT,P - 11/3/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 618.58 0.00 618.58 201864 - SYBERT, 11/3 20012601 AVILES.J - 10/9/01 001.155930- 634101 -00000 0.00 993.50 0.00 993.50 201864 AVILES, 10/9 20012601 PAYNE,K 12/14/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 24.10 0.00 24.10 201864 PAYNE, 12/14 20012601 GARCIA,R - 12/17/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 478.09 0.00 478.09 201864 - GARCIA, 12117 20012601 CROSBY,L - 12/7/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 724.59 0.00 724.59 201864 - CROSBY, 1217 20012601 CALANA,M - 12/11/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 724.59 0.00 724.59 201864 - CALANA, 12/11 20012601 HAYWARD,T - 10/29/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 430.03 0.00 430.03 201864 - HAYWARD, 10/29 20012601 DISTEL,J - 12/5/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 352.63 0.00 352.63 201864 - DISTEL, 12/5 20013258 CALANA,M - 12/10/01 001 - 155930 - 634101.00000 0.00 525.67 0.00 525.67 201864 CALANA, 12/10 20013258 GOMEZ,J 1211101 001 - 155930- 634101 -00000 0.00 640.00 0.00 640.00 201864 GOMEZ, 1211 20012601 GOSSETT,D - 12/3/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 194.25 0.00 194.25 201864 - GOSSETT, 12/3 20012601 BOUCHARD - 9/21/01 001 - 155930.634101 -00000 0.00 477.50 0.00 477.50 201864 - BOUCHARD, 9/21 20012601 HAMPSON,A - 11120101 001 - 155930 - 634101.00000 0.00 106.50 0.00 106.50 201864 - HAMPSON, 11/20 20012601 GOSSETT,D - 11120101 001 - 155930.634101 -00000 0.00 231.50 0.00 231.50 201864 - GOSSETT, 11120 20012601 DISTEL,J - 12110101 001 - 155930.634101 -00000 0.00 724.59 0.00 724.59 201864 DISTEL, 12110 20012601 KEARNS, J - 11/25/01 001 - 155930 - 634101 -00000 0.00 197.03 0.00 197.03 201864 KEARNS, 11/25 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16JIGE 94 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9,153.44 CHECK NO 569428 VENDOR 13240 - NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 20013259 MUCCINO,M - 1/8/02 001 - 155930 - 634112 -00000 0.00 1,449.18 0.00 1,449.18 201867 - MUCCINO, 1/8 20012600 SYBERT,L - 12/17/01 001 - 155930 - 634112 -00000 0.00 2,173.77 0.00 2,173.77 201867 - SYBERT, 12/17 20012600 HAMPSON,A - 10/14/01 001. 155930- 634112 -00000 0.00 714.10 0.00 714.10 201867 HAMPSON, 10/14 20013259 KEARNS, J - 1/5/02 001 - 155930 - 634112 -00000 0.00 4,347.54 0.00 4,347.54 201867 KEARNS, 1/5 20012600 AIME,M 11/26/01 001 - 155930 - 634112 -00000 0.00 1,448.16 0.00 1,448.16 201867 AIME, 11/26 20013259 CRUSE,D 12/2/01 001 - 155930 - 634112 -00000 0.00 3,622.95 0.00 3,622.95 201867 CRUSE, 12/2 20013259 JENKINS,L - 12/23/01 001- 155930 - 634112.00000 0.00 2,898.36 0.00 2,898.36 201867 - JENKINS, 12/23 20013259 ALZAMORA,C - 12/14/01 001. 155930 - 634112 -00000 0.00 724.59 0.00 724.59 201867 - ALZAMORA, 12/14 20012600 HAYWARD,T - 9/29/01 001 - 155930 - 634112 -00000 0.00 724.59 0.00 724.59 201867 - HAYWARD, 9/29 20012600 ANDRIS,R - 10112101 001 - 155930 - 634112.00000 0.00 2,172.24 0.00 2,172.24 201867 - ANDRIS, 10/12 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 20,275.48 CHECK NO 569682 VENDOR 259460 - NAPLES COURT REPORTING, INC. 20013070 7202 681 - 410310. 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 01- 1215- CF /ESPOSITO,V 20013070 7027 -1 681 - 410310 - 633042 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 00- 2865- CF /MILES,A 20013070 7229 681. 410310 - 633032.00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 01- 1322- CF /HERNANDEZ,D 20013070 6828A 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 01- 1058CP /MCCARTHY,K FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 95 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013070 7189 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 01. 1611- CF /VELASQUEZ,P 20013070 8023 681. 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 01- 325- CF /COBB,C 20013070 8019A 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 00- 7161- CF /FOWLER,M 20013070 6911 -1 681 - 410310 - 633042 -00000 0.00 63.00 0.00 63.00 01. 397- CF /BARBARINO,M 20013070 8013 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 01- 1267- CF /SAINTIL,J 20013070 7213 681 - 410310 - 633032.00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 01- 103- CF /MOBLEY,D 20012961 8018 681. 410310- 633032 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 01- 1497- CF /BRENTLINGER 20012961 8019 681 - 410310 - 633032.00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 00- 1161- CF /FOWLER,M 20013070 8026 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 01- 9781MM /LEITE,F 20013070 8024 681 - 410310 - 633032.00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 01- 1688- CF /HARRELL,J 20012961 8007 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 01- 2007- CF /WILLIAMS,C 20013070 8027 681 - 410310 - 633032.00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 02- 12- CP /YEUS,O 20013070 8016 681 - 410310 - 633032.00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 01- 1660- CF /PINA,G 20013070 7199 -1 681 - 410310. 633042 -00000 0.00 57.00 0.00 57.00 00- 2762- CF /COOK,J 20012961 8012 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 01- 1688- CF /HARRELL,J 20012961 8003 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 45.00 01. 1929- CF /JOYNER,C 20012961 8014 681 - 410310 - 633032.00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 00. 366- CF /LOCKHART,M FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 96 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012961 8025 681.410310- 633032 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 01- 1267- CF /SAINTIL,J 20012961 8009 681 - 410310 - 633032.00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 01- 1789- CF /PAUL,W 20013070 T -2389 681 - 410310 - 633023 -00000 0.00 629.20 0.00 629.20 95- 1261 /MCCREA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,559.20 CHECK NO 569484 VENDOR 115170 - NAPLES CUSTOM HITCH & TRAILER SALES 20012629 47648 521.122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 30.51 0.00 30.51 200917 - ADAPTOR, 1 /11 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 30.51 CHECK NO 569429 VENDOR 13300 - NAPLES DAILY NEWS 20013064 1982165/001230 001 - 100130 - 649100 -00000 0.00 90.92 0.00 90.92 200213 - ADS, 1/5 -7 20013062 1985671/059404 669 - 100220 - 649100 -00000 0.00 162.04 0.00 162.04 153444 . ADS, 1/12 -14 20013063 1983918/029507 495 - 192310 - 648160 -00000 0.00 24.98 0.00 24.98 200413 - AD, 1 /10 20013061 1985667/053926 111- 138317 - 649100 -00000 0.00 45.39 0.00 45.39 200513 - ADS, 1/12 -14 20013069 1964718 . SHORTAGE 198 - 157410 - 648160.00000 0.00 1,475.00 0.00 1,475.00 204091 - SHORT PAY ON PREV ADS 20013059 1970879/001230 111. 138317 - 649100 -00000 0.00 9,660.06 0.00 9,660.06 200513 - ADS, 12/8 -10 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 11,458.39 CHECK NO 569430 VENDOR 13340 - NAPLES DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING 20012602 BACHELOR,T - 12/13/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 796.25 0.00 796.25 201863 - BACHELOR, 12/13 20012602 FREDERICK,C - 12/26/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 61.75 0.00 61.75 201863 FREDERICK, 12/26 20012602 DAVIS,C 12/13/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 1,446.25 0.00 1,446.25 201863 DAVIS, 12/13 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2 AGE 97 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012602 CALANA,M - 12/19/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 2.145.00 0.00 2,145.00 201863 CALANA, 12/19 20012602 CRUSE,D 12/17/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 113.75 0.00 113.75 201863 CRUSE, 12/17 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 4,563.00 CHECK NO 569731 VENDOR 284680 NAPLES ENDOSCOPY ASSOC. 20012627 NITTOLO,V - 1/9/02 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 614.25 0.00 614.25 153395 - NITTOLO, 1/9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 614.25 CHECK NO 569431 VENDOR 13370 NAPLES FEED & SEED, INC. 20012628 16864 001- 155410 - 652210.00000 0.00 194.51 0.00 194.51 202452 - ANIMAL SUPPLIES, 1 /11 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 194.51 CHECK NO 569698 VENDOR 271100 - NAPLES HEART CENTER 20012622 FREDERICK,C - 12/20/01 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 48.75 0.00 48.75 153396 - FREDERICK, 12/20 20012622 FREDERICK,C - 1211101 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 32.50 0.00 32.50 153396 - FREDERICK. 1211 20012622 FREDERICK,C - 12/20/01 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 107.25 0.00 107.25 153396 FREDERICK, 12/20 20012622 AIME,M 11/27/01 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 464.75 0.00 464.75 153396 AIME, 11/27 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 653.25 CHECK NO 569470 VENDOR 108550 - NAPLES MEDICAL CENTER 20002155 M WALDREN 10/5 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 193.70 0.00 193.70 201872 M WALDREN 10/5 20002155 J KEARNS 10/15 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 44.20 0.00 44.20 201872 J KEARNS 10/15 20002155 L EVARISTE 8/9 -13/01 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 58.50 0.00 58.50 201872 L EVARISTE 8/9 -13/01 20002155 J KEARNS 10/3 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 44.20 0.00 44.20 201872 J KEARNS 10/3 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 98 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012608 SILVA,WM - 12126101 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 59.15 0.00 59.15 201872 SILVA, 12/26 20012608 MAY,V 12/26/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 44.20 0.00 44.20 201872 MAY, 12/26 20002155 A MCGEE 10/3 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 44.20 0.00 44.20 201872 A MCGEE 10/3 20002155 L EVARISTE 8/10 001. 155930- 631210.00000 0.00 29.25 0.00 29.25 201872 L EVARISTE 8/10 20012608 KEARNS,J - 1/2/02 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 44.20 0.00 44.20 201872 - KEARNS, 1/2 20013256 SHEPPARD,S - 11/12/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 29.25 0.00 29.25 201872 - SHEPPARD, 11/12 20012608 PITTMAN.R - 9/6/01 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 29.25 0.00 29.25 201872 - PITTMAN, 9/6 20002155 W SILVA 8/24 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 304.85 0.00 304.85 201872 W SILVA 8/24 20002155 L EVARISTE 8/19 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 29.25 0.00 29.25 201872 L EVARISTE 8/19 20002155 W SILVA 10/3 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 59.15 0.00 59.15 201872 W SILVA 10/3 20012608 DISTEL.J - 12/17/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 68.25 0.00 68.25 201872 DISTEL, 12117 20012608 MCGEE,A - 1/8/02 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 560.95 0.00 560.95 201872 MCGEE, 1/8 20012608 MAY,V 12/31/01 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 31.20 0.00 31.20 201872 MAY, 12/31 20013256 FLIPPIN,J - 1/3 & 8/02 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 128.70 0.00 128.70 201872 - FLIPPIN, 1/3 & 8 20012608 KEARNS,J - 1/3/02 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 44.20 0.00 44.20 201872 KEARNS, 1/3 20012608 MAY,V 1/8/02 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 128.70 0.00 128.70 201872 MAY, 1/8 20013256 DISTEL.J - 1/11/02 001 - 155930.631210 -00000 0.00 99.45 0.00 99.45 201872 - DISTEL. 1 /11 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20002155 L EVARISTE 5/18.20/01 201872 L EVARISTE 5/18 -20/01 20012608 FLIPPIN,J - 12/11/01 201872 - FLIPPIN, 12111 20002155 J DISTEL 9/28/01 201872 J DISTEL 9/28/01 20002155 L EVARISTE 8/14,16 201872 L EVARISTE 8/14, 16 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 001 - 155930- 631210.00000 0.00 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 16J2AGE 99 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 383.50 0.00 383.50 108.55 0.00 108.55 125.45 0.00 125.45 58.50 0.00 58.50 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,750.80 CHECK NO 569432 VENDOR 13650 NAPLES OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY 20013260 MORGAN,D - 6/18/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 89.05 0.00 89.05 201880 - MORGAN, 6/18 20013260 MORGAN,D - 6/18/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 19.50 0.00 19.50 201880 - MORGAN, 6/18 20013260 MORGAN,D - 10/3/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 2,312.70 0.00 2,312.70 201880 - MORGAN, 10/3 20013260 MORGAN.D - 10/3/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 809.25 0.00 809.25 201880 - MORGAN, 10/3 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,230.50 CHECK NO 569433 VENDOR 13690 NAPLES PRINTING COMPANY 20012606 041129 001.156110- 647110 -00000 0.00 2,600.00 0.00 2,600.00 203221 -PRINT BROCHURES F /CHILDN PROG CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,600.00 CHECK NO 569436 VENDOR 13700 - NAPLES RADIOLOGISTS 20013274 SYBERT,L - 12/17/01 001.155930- 631990 -00000 0.00 18.20 0.00 18.20 203360 - SYBERT, 12/17 20012609 GREGORY,M - 11/14/01 001. 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 19.50 0.00 19.50 203360 - GREGORY, 11/14 20013274 HAYWARD,T - 11/9/01 001. 155930- 631990 -00000 0.00 35.75 0.00 35.75 203360 HAYWARD, 11/9 20013274 MAGER,J 6/16/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 91.00 0.00 91.00 203360 MAGER, 6/16 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2 AGE 100 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012609 CALANA,M - 12/10/01 001.155930.631990 -00000 0.00 81.25 0.00 81.25 203360 - CALANA, 12/10 20012609 GARDNER,F - 12/10/01 001. 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 19.50 0.00 19.50 203360 GARDNER, 12/10 20013274 GOOD,D 11/3/01 001. 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 153.40 0.00 153.40 203360 GOOD, 11/3 20012609 AIME,M 11/26/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 18.20 0.00 18.20 203360 AIME, 11/26 20012609 CROSBY,L - 12/7/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 351.00 0.00 351.00 203360 - CROSBY, 1217 20013274 VEENSCHOTEN - 11/13/01 001. 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 19.50 0.00 19.50 203360 - VEENSCHOTEN. 11/13 20012609 CROSBY,L . 12/7/01 001. 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 1,573.00 0.00 1,573.00 203360 CROSBY, 12/7 20012609 CRUSE,D 12/2 -4/01 001 - 155930- 631990 -00000 0.00 336.70 0.00 336.70 203360 CRUSE, 12/2 -4 20012609 CALANA,M - 12/26/01 001 - 155930 - 631990.00000 0.00 19.50 0.00 19.50 203360 - CALANA, 12/26 20012609 CORONA,D - 11/17 & 19/01 001- 155930 - 631990.00000 0.00 91.00 0.00 91.00 203360 CORONA, 11/17 & 19 20013274 GOOD,D 11 /l /01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 18.20 0.00 18.20 203360 GOOD, 11 /1 20012609 CORONA,D - 11/23/01 001 - 155930- 631990 -00000 0.00 195.00 0.00 195.00 203360 - CORONA, 11/23 20013274 KEARNS,J - 1/3/02 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 195.00 0.00 195.00 203360 - KEARNS, 1/3 20012609 MORGAN,D • 10/3/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 19.50 0.00 19.50 203360 - MORGAN, 10/3 20012609 MCKENNA,D . 12/23/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 39.00 0.00 39.00 203360 - MCKENNA, 12/23 20012609 FREDERICK,C - 12/3 -7/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 75.40 0.00 75.40 203360 FREDERICK, 12/3 -7 20013274 GOOD,D 11 /l /01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 234.00 0.00 234.00 203360 GOOD. 11 /1 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20013274 HAYWARD,T - 10/29/01 203360 - HAYWARD, 10/29 20013274 HAYWARD,T - 11/7/01 203360 - HAYWARD, 11/7 20012609 DISTEL,J - 12/10/01 203360 - DISTEL, 12110 20012609 GARCIA,R - 12/28/01 203360 GARCIA, 12/28 20012609 CAGLE,A 12/24/01 203360 CAGLE, 12/24 20013274 KEARNS,J - 1/2/02 203360 - KEARNS, 112 20012609 TOGHER,A - 12/10/01 203360 - TOGHER, 12 /10 20013274 CALANA,M - 12/28/01 203360 CALANA, 12/28 20013274 MAGER,J 6/16/01 203360 MAGER, 6/16 20012609 CALANA,M - 12/11/01 203360 - CALANA, 12/11 20013274 CALANA,M - 12/28/01 203360 - CALANA, 12/28 20012609 DEGENNARO,L - 12/25/01 203360 - DEGENNARO, 12/25 20013274 CALANA,M - 12/27/01 203360 - CALANA, 12/27 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 0.00 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 0.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 155930 - 631990.00000 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631990.00000 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 001. 155930- 631990 -00000 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631990.00000 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569437 VENDOR 13790 - NAPLES STEEL PRODUCTS 20012625 1396 306 - 116360 - 652990 -80087 152299 - GALV. PIPE & TUBE, 1 /11 CHECK NO 569662 VENDOR 252620 - NATIONAL PUBLIC SAFETY INFORMATION 16J2AGE 101 AMT NET VCHR DISC 107.25 0.00 26.00 0.00 195.00 0.00 40.30 0.00 19.50 0.00 55.90 0.00 157.95 0.00 18.20 0.00 82.55 0.00 18.20 0.00 130.00 0.00 19.50 0.00 113.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 657.43 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 107.25 26.00 195.00 40.30 19.50 55.90 157.95 18.20 82.55 18.20 130.00 19.50 113.75 4,587.70 657.43 657.43 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 102 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012626 27109 490 - 144610- 654110 -00000 0.00 99.00 0.00 99.00 152856 - NAT'L DIR OF FIRE CHIEFS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 99.00 CHECK NO 569734 VENDOR 285720 - NATIONAL RECREATION 20012971 MEMB #19338 DUES- M.RAMSEY 111 - 156310- 654210 -00000 0.00 70.00 0.00 70.00 152558 - RENWL MEMB F /RAMSEY CHECK TOTAL 0.00 70.00 CHECK NO 569658 VENDOR 248010 - NEUROSCIENCE & SPINE ASSOCIATION 20012607 NOTTER,T - 12128101 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 74.75 0.00 74.75 201885 - NOTTER, 12/28 20013298 BRADBURY L 12/20/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 825.50 0.00 825.50 201885 BRADBURY 12/20 20013298 CLEVERGER 1/3/02 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 110.50 0.00 110.50 201885 CLEVERGER 1/3 20012607 BRADBURY.L - 1/7/02 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 110.50 0.00 110.50 201885 - BRADBURY, 1/7 20012607 SHEPARD,S - 12/26/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 110.50 0.00 110.50 201885 - SHEPARD, 12/26 20013298 CLEVERNER 1/16/02 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 52.00 0.00 52.00 201885 CLEVERNER 1/16/02 20012607 COWART,K - 1/8/02 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 110.50 0.00 110.50 201885 - COWART, 1/8 20012607 NOTTER,T - 1/9/02 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 63.70 0.00 63.70 201885 - NOTTER, 1/9 20013298 VERRET J 1/14/02 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 107.25 0.00 107.25 201885VERRET 1/14/02 20012607 NOTTER,T - 1/4/02 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 87.75 0.00 87.75 201885 - NOTTER, 1/4 20013298 POWELL S 11/15/01 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 52.00 0.00 52.00 201885 POELL 11/15/01 20013298 BRADBURY L 12/19 &20 001 - 155930- 631210.00000 0.00 5.110.30 0.00 5,110.30 201885 BRADBURY 12/19 &20 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20012607 POWELL,S - 12/20/01 201885 - POWELL, 12120 20013298 SHEPARD S- 12/14/01 201885 SHEPARD 12/14 20012607 TRACY,S - 12/31101 201885 - TRACY, 12/31 20012607 CONLEY,L - 1/9/02 201885 - CONLEY, 1/9 20013298 MUCCIRO M 1/8/02 201885 MUCCIRO M 1/8/02 20013298 ZAPATA Y 1/10/02 201885 ZAPATA 1110102 20012607 HIGGINBOTHAM - 6/27/01 201885 - HIGGINBOTHAM, 6/27 20012607 NOTTER,T - 12/27/01 201885 - NOTTER, 12/27 20013298 NOTTER T 1 /11 /01 201885 NOTTER 1111102 20013298 ZAPATA 1110/02 201885 ZAPATA 1110102 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS VCHR DISC SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 001 - 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 001. 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569867 VENDOR 345010 - NEW HERMES, INC. 20012624 GA73369.0 001 - 157110 - 652990 -00000 0.00 001 - 157110 - 641950.00000 0.00 153128 - PLASTIC & FOAM TAPE, 1/8 CHECK NO 569739 VENDOR 286930 - NEXTEL 20012963 0001849438 -5 12/15 -1/14 495 - 192330. 641700 -00000 202066 - 0001849438.5 12/15- 1/14/02 20012964 0002131764 -9 12/15 -1/14 001 - 121810 - 649990 -00000 202371 - 0002131764 -9 12/15 - 1/14/02 20012630 0002179829 -3 12/15 -1/14 001 - 144510 - 641700.00000 200555 - 0002179829 -3 12/15. 1/14/02 16J2AGE 103 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 341.25 0.00 341.25 43.55 0.00 43.55 110.50 0.00 110.50 110.50 0.00 110.50 4,765.80 0.00 4.765.80 898.95 0.00 898.95 841.75 0.00 841.75 87.75 0.00 87.75 74.75 0.00 74.75 52.00 0.00 52.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 14,142.05 205.71 9.87 0.00 215.58 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 215.58 0.00 63.34 0.00 63.34 0.00 123.43 0.00 123.43 0.00 60.75 0.00 60.75 CHECK NO 569438 VENDOR 14140 - OFFICE FURNITURE & DESIGN FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 104 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013065 0001901718 -5 12/15 -1/14 408. 233312 - 641700 -00000 0.00 228.86 0.00 228.86 202303 - 0001901718 -5 12/15- 1/14/02 20013068 0001889247.1 12/15 -1/14 408 - 233351 - 641700 -00000 0.00 1,262.19 408 - 210120 - 641700 -00000 0.00 49.95 0.00 1,312.14 201108 - 0001889247 -1 12/15- 1/14/02 20013066 0002151450 -0 12/15 -1/14 408- 233313 - 641700 -00000 0.00 156.16 0.00 156.16 202302 - 0002151450 -0 12/15 - 1/14/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,944.68 CHECK NO 569684 VENDOR 261470 NOLEN- MARTINA REPORTING SERVICES 20012962 43033 681 - 410310 - 633032 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 60.00 00- 1216- CF /KIPP,R. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 60.00 CHECK NO 569775 VENDOR 310560 NORA SEHEULT 20013257 1/25/02 1 HR 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 1/25/02 1 HR 20012967 1/17/02 2.5 HRS 681 - 421190 - 634402.00000 0.00 40.00 0.00 40.00 1117102 2.5 HRS 20013257 1/28/02 3.5 HRS 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 56.00 0.00 56.00 1/28/02 3.5 HRS 20013257 1/24/02 3.5 HRS 681 - 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 56.00 0.00 56.00 1/24/02 3.5 HRS 20013257 1/22/02 5 HRS 681- 431590 - 634402 -00000 0.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 1/22/02 5 HRS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 248.00 CHECK NO 569464 VENDOR 103620 - NORTH NAPLES FIRE CONTROL DISTRICT 20012578 FEB 2002 STATION 8 490 - 144610 - 644100 -00000 0.00 300.00 0.00 300.00 FEB 2002 STATION 8 200101 20012577 FEB 2002 MEDIC 16 490 - 144610. 644100 -00000 0.00 400.00 0.00 400.00 FEB 2002 MEDIC 16 200104 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 700.00 CHECK NO 569438 VENDOR 14140 - OFFICE FURNITURE & DESIGN 6J2AGE 105 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012633 2692 001 - 122240 - 651110 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 152688 - RECEPTACLE - DUPLEX, 1/8 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569733 VENDOR 285590 - OFFICE MAX 20012631 2523J009/601118001227258 001 - 121140 - 651950 -00000 0.00 279.99 001 - 121140 - 651110 -00000 0.00 54.97 0.00 152965 - FAX MACHINE & SUPPLIES, 1/9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569516 VENDOR 139350 OFFICE PAVILION 20012632 22448 111 - 156380 - 651910 -00000 0.00 330.88 0.00 150129 - STOOL, 1 /11 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569874 VENDOR 345910 OUTSIDE AIR SOLUTIONS. INC. 20012603 1024 001- 122240 - 652997.00000 0.00 2,395.00 0.00 202276 - INSPECTION F /DEC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569821 VENDOR 330350 - PAT'S PUMP AND BLOWER 20012718 302072 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 102.75 0.00 200696 SEALS, 1/7 20012718 302061 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 137.75 0.00 200696 PIPE, 1/7 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569620 VENDOR 212260 - PATRICK H. NEALE 20012604 20764 113 - 138912 - 631100 -00000 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 202216 - SERVICES FOR DEC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569439 VENDOR 14480 - PATRICK M. KANE, MD, P.A. 20012969 CROSBY,L - 1/2/02 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 40.95 0.00 153397 - CROSBY, 112 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 VCHR DISC VCHR NET COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 0.00 REPORT 100 -601 96.00 0.00 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS 32.00 0.00 32.00 76.00 0.00 76.00 SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER 32.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 32.00 FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER 0.00 DESCRIPTION 50.00 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 569656 VENDOR 247350 - PEDERSEN PRINTING 0.00 20012977 1515 0.00 40.60 113 - 138312. 647110 -00000 0.00 153241 BUSINESS CARDS, 1 /10 20012616 1519 001 - 000000. 142900 -00000 0.00 200053 BUSINESS CARDS, 1 /10 20012616 1518 001 - 000000 - 142900 -00000 0.00 200053 BUSINESS CARDS, 1 /10 20012978 1511 113. 138912 - 652990 -00000 0.00 152921 BUSINESS CARDS, 1/7 20012976 1516 001- 121810 - 647110 -00000 0.00 152875 BUSINESS CARDS, 1 /10 20012973 1512 001 - 122240 - 651110 -00000 0.00 152719 BUSINESS CARDS, 1/7 20012972 1517 130 - 157710 - 647110 -00000 0.00 152547 BUSINESS CARDS, 1 /10 CHECK NO 569922 VENDOR 900110 - PETER NERVO 301200 REFUND -EXMPT FEE, NERVO,P 473 - 173411 - 343413.00000 0.00 NERVO,PETER REF -EXMPT FEE, CANCELED CHECK NO 569729 VENDOR 284370 - PETER WILTSIE 20012591 12/31 -1/23 TRVL P WILTSIE 111 - 156310 - 640200 -00000 0.00 12/31 -1/23 TRVL P WILTSIE CHECK NO 569805 VENDOR 325990 - PETS PLUS 20012615 137012 203661 - ANIMAL SUPPLIES, 1 /10 CHECK NO 569876 VENDOR 346290 - PFIZER INC. 20012966 8359019 153465 - 5% DISCOUNT 16J2 AGE 106 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 160.00 0.00 160.00 96.00 0.00 96.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 76.00 0.00 76.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 32.00 0.00 32.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 460.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 50.00 40.60 0.00 40.60 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 40.60 001 - 156363 - 652255 -00000 0.00 46.63 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 001 - 155410 - 652710 -00000 0.00 2.18- 0.00 46.63 46.63 2.18- it 6J2AGE 107 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012966 8359019 001 - 155410.652710 -00000 0.00 437.00 0.00 153465 - MEDICINE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569628 VENDOR 217960 - PHIL BURNHAM SUPPLY 20012614 415 408 - 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 130.00 0.00 200758 - SUPPLIES, 1/9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569677 VENDOR 257160 - PHILIP T. REGALA. M.D. 20012968 EMERTON,C - 12/21/01 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 195.65 0.00 153398 . EVERTON, 12121 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569724 VENDOR 282390 - PITMAN - HARTENSTEIN & ASSOCIATES,INC 20013203 #8 336 - 163650- 631400 -60101 0.00 5,114.79 0.00 104922 12/1- 12/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569784 VENDOR 315440 - PLUMBMASTER 20012974 51135470 001 - 122240 - 652995.00000 0.00 679.80 0.00 152684 - CARTRIDGE FORMET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569672 VENDOR 255770 PRAXAIR DISTRIBUTION SOUTHEAST,LLC 20013067 PJ162180 490 - 144610.652720 -00000 0.00 36.00 0.00 201407 - OXYGEN, 1/8 20013067 PJ162181 490 - 144610. 652720 -00000 0.00 92.00 0.00 201407 - OXYGEN, 1/8 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569868 VENDOR 345060 PRECISION CARPENTRY & CONTRACTING 20013325 #129 - NIETO 191 - 138785- 884200 -33751 0.00 1,750.00 0.00 63854800008 A NIETO 203737 20013326 129 - RIVERA 191- 138785 - 884200 -33751 0.00 2,130.00 0.00 47871200005 A RIVERA 204097 6J2AGE 108 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20013327 129 - NIETO 191 - 138785- 884200 -33751 0.00 359.00 0.00 63854800008 A NIETO 153717 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569543 VENDOR 159000 - PRECISION CLEANING INC. 20012619 3243 001- 122220 - 634999 -00000 0.00 571.13 0.00 200164 - PRESSURE CLEANING, 1 /10 20012975 3244 130 - 157710 - 634999 -00000 0.00 526.45 0.00 152561 - PRESSURE CLN GGCOM CTRDOS12 /8 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569689 VENDOR 264400 - PREFERRED TRAVEL OF NAPLES 20012958 209997 G YILMAZ 3/2,3/7 470 - 173410 - 640300 -00000 0.00 495.50 0.00 152994 G YILMAZ AIRFARE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569513 VENDOR 138230 - PRIDE OF FLORIDA, INC. 20012618 ZI081561 001- 000000 - 142900 -00000 0.00 169.00 0.00 200052 - PRINT JOBS, 1/8 20012618 ZI081559 001 - 000000 - 142900 -00000 0.00 118.00 0.00 200052 - PRINT JOBS, 1/8 20012618 ZI081901 001 - 000000- 142900 -00000 0.00 27.74 0.00 200052 - PRINT JOBS, 1/14 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569760 VENDOR 299040 - PRIMEDIA WORKPLACE LEARNING 20012621 900268165 146- 144380 - 654360.00000 0.00 228.00 0.00 200295 - SUBSCRIPTION FOR DECEMBER CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569578 VENDOR 174760 - PROCRAFT BATTERIES 20012617 425131836 521 - 122410. 646425 -00000 0.00 132.60 0.00 200698 - BATTERIES, 1 /11 20012617 153760 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 135.60 0.00 200698 - BATTERIES, 1/11 VCHR NET 359.00 4,239.00 571.13 526.45 1.097.58 495.50 495.50 169.00 118.00 27.74 314.74 228.00 228.00 132.60 135.60 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 109 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012617 421351839 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 140.47 0.00 140.47 200698 - BATTERIES, 1/14 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 408.67 CHECK NO 569693 VENDOR 267130 - PROFESSIONAL BUILDING SYSTEMS, INC. 20010008 29490 198 - 157440 - 762200 -00000 0.00 24,967.00 0.00 24,967.00 203425 ROBERTS RANCH RESTORATION CHECK TOTAL 0.00 24,967.00 CHECK NO 569541 VENDOR 158120 - PUBLIX #410 20012612 I- 03919515/32160040 111. 156313 - 652210 -00000 0.00 26.31 0.00 26.31 202018 - FOOD SUPPLIES, 1/3 20012613 I- 03919494/321600400 130. 157710 - 652210 -00000 0.00 10.99 0.00 10.99 202020 - FOOD SUPPLIES, 1 /10 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 37.30 CHECK NO 569524 VENDOR 144550 - PYRAMID II JANITORIAL SUPPLIES 20012605 298981 001 - 156363 - 652510 -00000 0.00 1,306.00 0.00 1,306.00 200868 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES, 1/4 20012611 299533 408 - 253211 - 652510 -00000 0.00 30.00 0.00 30.00 200396 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES, 1 /11 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,336.00 CHECK NO 569612 VENDOR 202510 - PYRAMID II, INC. 20013060 297839 001 - 155410 - 652510 -00000 0.00 73.92 0.00 73.92 201654 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES, 12/13 20013060 299250 001 - 155410 - 652510 -00000 0.00 206.00 0.00 206.00 201654 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES, 1/8 20013060 299882 001 - 155410 - 652510.00000 0.00 29.20 0.00 29.20 201654 JANITORIAL SUPPLIES, 1/9 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 309.12 CHECK NO 569763 VENDOR 301360 - QUALITY CASH REGISTER SYSTEMS 20012970 8475 470 - 173441 - 634999 -00000 0.00 80.00 0.00 80.00 151737 - LABOR CRGS FOR 1/8/02 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC CHECK NO 569702 VENDOR 272640 - QUALITY CONTROL BUILDERS, INC 20011881 #5 RETAINAGE 496. 000000- 205100.00000 0.00 102644 11 -20 TO 1 -2 -02 RETAINAGE 14,575.00- 20013301 #9 RETAINAGE 497 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 4.268.00 102686 THRU 1/3/02 RETAINAGE 0.00 20013301 #9 RETAINAGE 121 - 000000. 205100 -00000 0.00 102856 THRU 1/3/02 RETAINAGE 4,032.00 20013286 #4 0.00 496 - 192340. 763100 -33383 0.00 107571 11/19/01 TO 117102 156.263.00 20013301 #9 0.00 497 - 192340. 763100 -33010 0.00 102686 THRU 1/3/02 64.50 20011882 #4 0.00 496 - 192340 - 763100 -33326 0.00 102642 THRU 1/2/02 2.674.17 20011881 #5 0.00 496 - 192340 - 763100 -33326 0.00 102644 11 -20 TO 1 -2 -02 238.00 20013301 #9 0.00 121 - 138755 - 762100.33023 102856 THRU 1/3/02 CHECK NO 569811 VENDOR 327230 - R.Y.R.R. INC., 20012576 JAN 2002 UNDERPAID 313 - 163611. 644100 -00000 FEB 2002 200093 UNDERPAID 20012576 DEC 2001 UNDERPAID 313 - 163611. 644100 -00000 FEB 2002 200093 UNDERPAID 20012576 FEB 2002 313 - 163611 - 644100 -00000 FEB 2002 200093 CHECK NO 569357 VENDOR 223390 - RADISSON TWIN TOWERS 20007922 380675 S MCMICHAEL 2/11 313- 163611 - 640300 -00000 AND 16J2AGE 110 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 80.00 0.00 3,193.00- 0.00 3,193.00- 0.00 250.00- 0.00 250.00- 0.00 14,575.00- 0.00 14,575.00- 0.00 4.268.00 0.00 4,268.00 0.00 6.555.00 0.00 6,555.00 0.00 4,032.00 0.00 4,032.00 0.00 32.384.00 0.00 32.384.00 0.00 156,263.00 0.00 156.263.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 185,484.00 0.00 64.50 0.00 64.50 0.00 64.50 0.00 64.50 0.00 2,674.17 0.00 2.674.17 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,803.17 0.00 238.00 0.00 238.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 238.00 6J2AGE 111 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 569834 VENDOR 334420 RAY'S LAWN & GARDEN 20012447 10599 001 - 157110. 634999 -00000 0.00 438.75 0.00 202875 MAINT 20012446 10421 001. 157110- 634999 -00000 0.00 438.75 0.00 202875 GROUNDS MAINT 20012448 10449 001 - 157110- 634999 -00000 0.00 438.75 0.00 202875 MAINT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569483 VENDOR 114950 RAYMOND E. REILLY, M.D.,P.A. 20012760 M.ST.FLEUR 11/12- 12/14/01 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 381.23 0.00 153399 M.ST.FLEUR PHYS.FEE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569441 VENDOR 15730 RECORDED BOOKS, LLC. 20012465 1376422 355 - 156190 - 652670 -00000 0.00 1,400.00 0.00 201638 CASS BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569709 VENDOR 275110 REDDY ICE CORPORATION 20012445 115023 408. 233351 - 652990 -00000 0.00 18.00 0.00 202249 ICE 20012444 111077 408. 253212- 652990 -00000 0.00 28.80 0.00 200245 ICE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569663 VENDOR 254040 RENTAL SERVICE CORPORATION 20012442 10441985 002 408. 253221 - 634999 -00000 0.00 852.00 0.00 201060 CRANE SVS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569917 VENDOR 900030 RHONDA WATKINS 301197 1/22 -25 TRVL R WATKINS 114 - 178970 - 640300 -00000 0.00 42.00 0.00 1/22 -25 TRVL R WATKINS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 438.75 438.75 438.75 1,316.25 381.23 381.23 1,400.00 1,400.00 18.00 28.80 46.80 852.00 852.00 42.00 42.00 6J2AGE 112 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 569442 VENDOR 15980 RICHARD B. & MARY ANN LANSDALE 20012556 FEB 2002 001 - 061010 - 644100 -00000 0.00 2,916.67 0.00 FEB 2002 201886 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569569 VENDOR 170740 RITA ROSE MEYER 20013291 BALLET/ TAP 11/13 -1/31 111. 156380 - 634999 -00000 0.00 625.30 0.00 201001 BALLET /TAP 11/13 -1/31 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569604 VENDOR 194170 RIVIERA GOLF ESTATES 20012560 LOT 555 & 556 1 QTR 001- 172910 - 649990.00000 0.00 300.00 0.00 1 QTR 200823 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569505 VENDOR 131220 ROBERT B. TOBER, INC. 20012572 FEB 2002 EMS 490 - 144610 - 631210 -00000 0.00 4,375.00 0.00 FEB 2002 200102 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569467 VENDOR 108430 ROBERT FLINN MOVING AND STORAGE 20012464 112 00058 001- 443010 - 634999 -00000 0.00 172.10 0.00 200992 STORAGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569765 VENDOR 303240 ROBERT FLINN RECORDS MGMT CENTER 20012466 112 00050 001 - 122240 - 639964.00000 0.00 2,665.37 0.00 201273 RETREIVAL AND STORAGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569892 VENDOR 349750 - ROBERT HERRINGTON 20012957 1/24 -25 TRVL R HERRINGTON 101 - 163612 - 640300 -00000 0.00 27.00 0.00 1/24 -25 TRVL R HERRINGTON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569828 VENDOR 333400 - ROBERT S. COX FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 113 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012960 1/24 TRVL R COX 001 - 172970 - 640200 -00000 0.00 32.39 0.00 32.39 1/24 TRVL R COX CHECK TOTAL 0.00 32.39 CHECK NO 569781 VENDOR 313860 ROBERTA REISS 20012588 1/24 TRVL R REISS 001.156160- 640300.00000 0.00 29.78 0.00 29.78 1/24 TRVL R REISS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 29.78 CHECK NO 569607 VENDOR 196120 ROGER CARVALLO 20012563 FEB 2002 2ND FLOOR 001- 041010 - 644100.00000 0.00 5,676.39 0.00 5,676.39 FEB 2002 200448 20012563 FEB 2002 STE 104 001 - 041010 - 644100.00000 0.00 1.456.00 0.00 1.456.00 FEB 2002 200448 20012563 FEB 2002 STE 102 001 - 041010 - 644100.00000 0.00 1,349.23 0.00 1.349.23 FEB 2002 200448 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 8,481.62 CHECK NO 569865 VENDOR 344370 - RUSH MESSENGER SERVICE WEST, INC 20012443 18191 109 - 182601 - 641950 -00000 0.00 24.00 109 - 182900 - 641950 -00000 0.00 24.00 778 - 182700 - 641950 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 68.00 200523 CAURIER SVS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 68.00 CHECK NO 569804 VENDOR 325750 - RWA INC. 20013207 8420 313 - 163673 - 631400.60027 0.00 54,660.00 0.00 54,660.00 102659 THRU 12/31/01 20013207 8419 313.163673- 631400.60027 0.00 28.730.25 0.00 28,730.25 102659 THRU 12/31/01 20013207 8418 313 - 163673 - 631400 -60027 0.00 19,162.75 0.00 19,162.75 102659 THRU 12/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 102,553.00 CHECK NO 569552 VENDOR 162220 . RWC WELDING 20012763 22753 111 - 163647 - 652990.00000 0.00 303.42 0.00 303.42 152671 OPER.SUPPL. FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA I REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569444 VENDOR 16530 S & S ARTS AND CRAFTS 20012746 3849951 111 - 156343 - 652990 -00000 0.00 193.35 0.00 151973 ARTS & CRAFTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569691 VENDOR 267020 SAFETY PRODUCTS INC 20012449 319951 101 - 163620. 652140.00000 0.00 13.29 0.00 201131 SIGN FOR VEHICLE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569544 VENDOR 159590 - SAM "S CLUB #6364 NAPLES 20012762 J.VON RINTELN #366342988 001 - 144210. 654210 -00000 0.00 15.00 0.00 151376 J.VON RINTELN MMB /SHIP 20012865 366342988 24/35/44 111 - 156310 - 654210 -00000 0.00 15.00 130. 157710 - 654210 -00000 0.00 15.00 111. 156349 - 654210 -00000 0.00 15.00 0.00 152527 MMB /SHIP 24/35/44 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569584 VENDOR 179920 - SAM'S CLUB 20012634 55366342988 1/25/02 001. 156110 - 652990 -00000 0.00 89.15 0.00 153276 - SUPPLIES F /NEW BLDG 20013334 366342988 490 - 144610 - 654210 -00000 0.00 15.00 0.00 153468 366342988 20012864 366342988 PRIM.MMB /SHIP 001 - 121710 - 654210 -00000 0.00 130.00 0.00 153417 ANN.ADM.FEE 20013332 366342988 001 - 156110 - 652630.00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 153431 366342988 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569902 VENDOR 350830 - SANTIAGO ALVEREZ 20013275 REPAIR 191 - 138785. 884100.33751 0.00 2,499.42 0.00 204135 S ALVEREZ #73500001206 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6J2AGE 114 VCHR NET 303.42 193.35 193.35 13.29 13.29 15.00 45.00 60.00 89.15 15.00 130.00 75.00 309.15 2,499.42 2.499.42 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 115 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 569866 VENDOR 344990 - SAP PUBLIC SERVICES, INC. 20013075 7008085371 301 - 121125 - 654370 -01017 0.00 1,100.00 0.00 1,100.00 202768 J MCDONALD 20012812 9008003088 301- 121125 - 654370 -01017 0.00 1,638.00 0.00 1,638.00 202330 TRAINING MANUAL 20012811 8008070544 301 - 121125 - 654370 -01017 0.00 3,300.00 0.00 3,300.00 202330 I DAY TRAINING 20013075 7008085373 301 - 121125. 654370 -01017 0.00 1,100.00 0.00 1.100.00 202768 J TAYLOR 20012810 9008003253 301. 121125- 654370 -01017 0.00 1,220.00 0.00 1,220.00 203283 TRAINING MANUAL 20013075 7008085372 301 - 121125 - 654370 -01017 0.00 1,100.00 0.00 1.100.00 202768 J COLLI 20012812 9008003115 301. 121125. 654370 -01017 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 2,000.00 202330 INSTRUCTOR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 11,458.00 CHECK NO 569579 VENDOR 174790 SATCO 20012813 232584 408. 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 1,106.00 0.00 1,106.00 200428 ACID CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,106.00 CHECK NO 569481 VENDOR 114340 SBCCI 20012742 308812 113 - 138915- 654110 -00000 0.00 161.50 0.00 161.50 153332 MECH.CODE BOOK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 161.50 CHECK NO 569609 VENDOR 199020 SCHLUMBERGER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 20012450 IV50032 001 - 156363. 646970 -00000 0.00 503.83 0.00 503.83 201655 MISC PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 503.83 CHECK NO 569774 VENDOR 310380 SCHOOL HEALTH 20012814 647866 491 - 144611. 764250 -33416 0.00 4,984.91 0.00 4,984.91 203496 EQUIP FOR VEHICLE 6J2AGE 116 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569880 VENDOR 347400 - SCOTT DEAN 20013292 2/8/02 PRE TEEN DANCE 111 - 156380 - 634999 -00000 0.00 325.00 0.00 202895 2/8/02 /PRE TEEN DANCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569600 VENDOR 193330 - SCOTT PAINT CORP. 20012457 9053108 001 - 122240. 652999 -00000 0.00 78.01 0.00 201270 PAINT SUPPLIES 20012457 9052829 001 - 122240. 652999 -00000 0.00 152.42 0.00 201270 PAINT SUPPLIES 20012457 9053308 001 - 122240. 652999 -00000 0.00 165.42 0.00 201270 PAINT SUPPLIES 20012457 9053269 001 - 122240. 652999 -00000 0.00 60.87 0.00 201270 PAINT SUPPLIES 20012457 9053204 001 - 122240. 652999 -00000 0.00 34.81 0.00 201270 PAINT SUPPLIES 20012457 9053101 001- 122240 - 652999 -00000 0.00 145.35 0.00 201270 PAINT SUPPLIES 20012457 9053319 001 - 122240 - 652999 -00000 0.00 15.57 0.00 201270 PAINT SUPPLIES 20012457 9053230 001. 122240- 652999 -00000 0.00 54.88 0.00 201270 PAINT SUPPLIES 20012457 9053031 001 - 122240 - 652999 -00000 0.00 18.27 0.00 201270 PAINT SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569618 VENDOR 211140 - SEARS, ROEBUCK & COMPANY 20012478 0221986/2000865131 191 - 138785. 884100 -33751 0.00 551.98 0.00 203818 G ZELAYA #62102640005 20012478 0221986/2000865131 191 - 138785. 884100 -33751 0.00 899.99 0.00 203818 G ZELAYA #62102640005 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 VCHR NET 4,984.91 325.00 325.00 78.01 152.42 165.42 60.87 34.81 145.35 15.57 54.88 18.27 725.60 551.98 899.99 1.451.97 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 117 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 569725 VENDOR 282410 - SHAMROCK PLUMBING & MECHANICAL INC 20012469 34961 306. 156393 - 763310 -80214 0.00 1,119.87 0.00 1,119.87 204022 SEWER REPAIR 20012469 34962 306. 156393.763310 -80214 0.00 550.02 0.00 550.02 204022 SEWER REPAIR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,669.89 CHECK NO 569878 VENDOR 346910 SHANNON DARROW 20013264 1/11 -31 TRVL S DARROW 111 - 156390 - 640200 -00000 0.00 23.20 111 - 156390 - 640300 -00000 0.00 34.80 0.00 58.00 1/11.31 TRVL S DARROW CHECK TOTAL 0.00 58.00 CHECK NO 569785 VENDOR 315450 SHARON FRYE 20013071 PETTY CASH 001 - 121143. 652910 -00000 0.00 67.64 0.00 67.64 PETTY CASH CHECK TOTAL 0.00 67.64 CHECK NO 569699 VENDOR 271730 SHELL OIL COMPANY 20012451 079020467112 1/6 521 - 122450 - 652410 -00000 0.00 94.78 0.00 94.78 200699 GAS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 94.78 CHECK NO 569445 VENDOR 16910 SHERWIN WILLIAMS 20012458 6780 9 001 - 122240 - 652999 -00000 0.00 39.57 0.00 39.57 201267 PAINT SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 39.57 CHECK NO 569751 VENDOR 292970 SHOWCASES 20012476 200218 001.156110- 652610 -00000 0.00 2,570.00 001.156110- 641950.00000 0.00 205.60 0.00 2,775.60 204031 CD ALBUM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,775.60 CHECK NO 569683 VENDOR 260690 • SIGNCRAFT 20012747 18280 472. 173430 - 652990 -33821 0.00 95.00 0.00 95.00 152129 CH.ON BANNERS 6J2AGE 118 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569652 VENDOR 242480 - SIGNWORKS' 20012475 2342 521 - 122410- 647110 -00000 0.00 2,753.50 0.00 203549 SIGNS 20012744 2344 521. 122410 - 647110 -00000 0.00 415.00 0.00 153267 PRINTING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569480 VENDOR 114210 SMALL ENGINE WORLD 20012452 11019 521. 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 28.10 0.00 200701 PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569625 VENDOR 215640 SNAP -ON -TOOLS 20012453 72648 521.122410- 652910 -00000 0.00 234.62 0.00 200702 SUPPLIES 20012453 72651 521 - 122410 - 652910 -00000 0.00 49.10 0.00 200702 SUPPLIES 20012453 72646 521. 122410 - 652910 -00000 0.00 155.85 0.00 200702 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569881 VENDOR 347990 SOFTWARE EXPRESS 20012474 179543 001 - 122240 - 652920 -00000 0.00 1,412.00 0.00 203126 SOFTWARE LICENCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569779 VENDOR 313450 SOFTWARE HOUSE INTERNATIONAL 20012753 3A318 408.253221- 649010.00000 0.00 295.62 0.00 152097 LIC.& PERMIT 20012743 37BA5 001.156363- 652920 -00000 0.00 469.80 0.00 151726 COMP.SOFTWARE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569877 VENDOR 346900 SOLAR VCHR NET 95.00 2,753.50 415.00 3,168.50 28.10 28.10 234.62 49.10 155.85 439.57 1,412.00 1,412.00 295.62 469.80 765.42 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2vGE 119 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012558 FEB 2002 001 - 121730 - 644170 -00000 0.00 835.00 0.00 835.00 FEB 2002 203074 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 835.00 CHECK NO 569787 VENDOR 315770 - SOUTH FLORIDA INPATIENT MEDICAL 20012730 M.AIME 11/26- 11/28/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 260.65 0.00 260.65 153400 PHYS.FEE M.AIME 20012730 D.CORONA 11/17- 11/21/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 396.50 0.00 396.50 153400 PHYS.FEE D.CORONA CHECK TOTAL 0.00 657.15 CHECK NO 569352 VENDOR 174650 - SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DIST 20013278 PERMIT APPLICATION FEE 313 - 163673 - 649010 -65041 0.00 1,000.00 0.00 1,000.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,000.00 CHECK NO 569348 VENDOR 153150 - SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DIST. 20013279 PERMIT APPLICATION FEE 313. 163673 - 649010 -65041 0.00 1,750.00 0.00 1.750.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.750.00 CHECK NO 569446 VENDOR 17170 - SOUTHWEST ELECTRIC SUPPLY 20012473 481 301. 120402- 763100 -80172 0.00 355.00 0.00 355.00 203506 ADDITIONAL LIGHTING 20012473 479 301 - 120402. 763100 -80172 0.00 2,897.81 0.00 2,897.81 203506 ADDITIONAL LIGHTING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,252.81 CHECK NO 569648 VENDOR 238770 - SOUTHWEST FLORIDA HEART GROUP 20012472 F GARDNER 12/10 -12 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 1,056.25 0.00 1,056.25 201899 F GARDNER 12110 -12 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1.056.25 CHECK NO 569696 VENDOR 271040 - SPECIALISTS IN UROLOGY 20012731 K.MERRITT 1/2/02 001 - 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 172.25 0.00 172.25 153401 K.MERRITT PHYS.FEE FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 120 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012731 K.MERRITT 12/28/01 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 97.50 0.00 97.50 153401 K.MERRITT PHYS.FEE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 269.75 CHECK NO 569629 VENDOR 221660 SPECIALTY STORE SERVICES 20012749 201488 001 - 156110 - 652610.00000 0.00 39.59 0.00 39.59 153117 LIBRARY SUPPL. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 39.59 CHECK NO 569606 VENDOR 195660 SPECTRUM PAINTING & RESTORATION 20012816 216 408 - 233312 - 634999 -00000 0.00 17,976.00 0.00 17,976.00 202242 PAINT JOB 20012471 271 001 - 122240 - 639961 -00000 0.00 4,821.78 0.00 4,821.78 201266 PAINT LABOR 20012816 246 408- 233312 - 634999 -00000 0.00 17,976.00 0.00 17,976.00 202242 PAINT JOB CHECK TOTAL 0.00 40,773.78 CHECK NO 569447 VENDOR 17410 SPEEDY BLUEPRINTING 20013193 10195818 101 - 163610.652990.00000 0.00 99.16 0.00 99.16 200497 INK BOND 20012459 10198204 101.163630- 652990 -00000 0.00 28.95 0.00 28.95 200035 PAINT GUN CHECK TOTAL 0.00 128.11 CHECK NO 569732 VENDOR 285390 SPORTS ILLUSTRATED 20012868 GOLDEN GATE PARK 111 - 156313 - 654110 -00000 0.00 41.25 0.00 41.25 152214 MAG.GOLDEN GATE 20012866 IMMOKALEE SPORT CTR 111 - 156349 - 654110 -00000 0.00 41.25 0.00 41.25 152525 MAGAZINES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 82.50 CHECK NO 569670 VENDOR 255040 - SPRINT 20013294 643 5321 167 1/16 2/15 490 - 144610. 641900 -00000 0.00 4.67 0.00 4.67 643 5321 167 1/16 2/15 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 2AGE 121 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013294 774 5876 876 1/19 2/18 001 - 144210 - 641900 -00000 0.00 57.02 0.00 57.02 774 5876 876 1/19 2/18 20013294 092 4262 715 1/16 2/15 001- 156110 - 641400 -00000 0.00 3,148.00 0.00 3,148.00 092 4262 715 1/16 2/15 20013294 092 4177 894 1/16 2/15 001. 121143 - 641400 -00000 0.00 475.00 0.00 475.00 092 4177 894 1/16 2/15 20013294 775 0534 663 12122 01121 001 - 443010 - 641900 -00000 0.00 36.21 0.00 36.21 775 0534 663 12122 01121 20013294 591 1611 301 1/19 2/18 408 - 210130 - 641100 -00000 0.00 738.32 0.00 738.32 591 1611 301 1/19 2/18 20013294 774 6222 005 1/19 2/18 470 - 173410 - 641210 -00000 0.00 35.34 0.00 35.34 774 6222 005 1/19 2/18 20013294 591 4986 6618 1/19 2/18 001 - 156363 - 641900 -00000 0.00 172.63 0.00 172.63 591 4986 6618 1/19 2/18 20013294 643 3266 004 1/16 2/15 113 - 138900- 641900 -00000 0.00 31.79 0.00 31.79 643 3266 004 1/16 2/15 20013294 774 0955 557 1/19 2/18 001 - 010110 - 641210.00000 0.00 17.94 0.00 17.94 774 0955 557 1/19 2/18 20013294 774 5653 109 1/19 2/18 001. 155810- 641900 -00000 0.00 35.48 0.00 35.48 774 5653 109 1/19 2/18 20013294 643 1883 250 1/16 2/15 101 - 163610 - 641900 -00000 0.00 27.89 0.00 27.89 643 1883 250 1/16 2/15 20013294 793 5655 272 1/13 2/12 521 - 122410 - 641400 -00000 0.00 188.62 0.00 188.62 793 5655 272 1/13 2/12 20013294 092 2026 143 1/16 2/15 001 - 121143 - 641400 -00000 0.00 194.80 0.00 194.80 092 2026 143 1/16 2/15 20013294 658 1264 606 1/13 2/12 188 - 140480 - 641400 -00000 0.00 60.70 0.00 60.70 658 1264 606 1/13 2/12 20013294 793 0618 203 1/13 2/12 001 - 443010. 641900 -00000 0.00 57.02 0.00 57.02 793 0618 203 1/13 2/12 20013294 643 2265 205 1/16 2/15 129 - 156110 - 634999 -33014 0.00 27.89 0.00 27.89 643 2265 205 1/16 2/15 20013294 455 1202 295 1 /10 2/9 408 - 253211. 641100 -00000 0.00 46.83 408 - 253212 - 641100 -00000 0.00 93.58 0.00 140.41 455 1202 295 1 /10 2/9 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20013294 774 9370 091 1/19 2/18 774 9370 091 1/19 2118 20012460 093 2800 130 1/16 2/15 093 2800 130 1/16 2/15 201322 20013294 658 1169 605 1/13 2/12 658 1169 605 1/13 2/12 20013294 262 4130 621 1/13 2/12 262 4130 621 1/13 2112 20013294 793 7520 659 1/13 2/12 793 7520 659 1/13 2/12 20013294 591 4903 159 1/19 2/18 591 4903 159 1/19 2/18 20013294 774 5148 147 1/19 2/18 774 5148 147 1/19 2/18 20013294 643 6968 299 1/16 2/15 643 6968 299 1/16 2/15 20013294 793 2633 595 1/13 2/12 793 2633 595 1/13 2112 20013294 774 4010 010 1/19 2/18 774 4010 010 1/19 2/18 20013294 657 3002 010 12/28 01/27 657 3002 010 12/28 01/27 20012460 092 1528 163 1/16 02/17 092 1528 163 1/16 2/15 201322 20013294 352 6643 602 1/13 2112 362 6643 0602 1/13 2112 20012460 793 1314 154 1/13 2112 793 1314 154 1/13 2112 20013294 657 3002 010 11/28 12127 657 3002 010 1128 12/27 20013294 774 1667 780 1/19 2118 774 1667 780 1/19 2/18 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 313 - 163611 - 641210 -00000 0.00 101 - 163609 - 641210 -00000 0.00 681 - 421510 - 641900 -00000 0.00 188 - 140480- 641400 -00000 0.00 001 - 156110 - 641900.00000 0.00 521. 122450- 641400 -00000 0.00 408- 253211- 641100 -00000 0.00 001. 156180 - 641210 -00000 0.00 113 - 138900 - 641900 -00000 0.00 490 - 144610 - 641900 -00000 0.00 001 - 100110 - 641210 -00000 0.00 001 - 155410 - 641900.00000 0.00 001- 155410 - 641200.00000 0.00 681 - 421510 - 641900.00000 0.00 188 - 140480 - 641400.00000 0.00 681 - 421510 - 641900.00000 0.00 001 - 155410 - 641900 -00000 0.00 001 - 155410 - 641200 -00000 0.00 001- 155230 - 641900 -00000 0.00 16J2AGE 122 AMT NET VCHR DISC 19.87 19.87 0.00 815.25 24.93 444.23 48.14 34.73 86.54 120.20 33.28 28.25 57.96 18.35 173.75 25.18 64.21 31.60 12.57 32.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 39.74 815.25 24.93 444.23 48.14 34.73 86.54 120.20 33.28 28.25 76.31 173.75 25.18 64.21 44.17 32.37 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 123 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013294 262 8526 135 1/13 2/12 001 - 156110 - 641900 -00000 0.00 93.33 0.00 93.33 262 8526 135 1/13 2112 20013294 774 6886 703 1/19 2/18 408 - 233352 - 641100 -00000 0.00 443.24 0.00 443.24 774 6886 703 1/19 2/18 20013294 774 7960 025 1/19 2/18 101 - 163609 - 641900 -00000 0.00 60.05 313 - 163611 - 641900 -00000 0.00 60.05 101 - 163612- 641900 -00000 0.00 60.05 101. 163610 - 641900 -00000 0.00 60.05 001 - 172910 - 641900 -00000 0.00 30.02 001 - 172970 - 641900 -00000 0.00 30.03 0.00 300.25 774 7960 025 1/19 2/18 20013294 434 8952 045 1/16 2/15 490 - 144610 - 641900.00000 0.00 8.88 0.00 8.88 434 8952 045 1/16 2/15 20013294 793 3795 299 1/13 2/12 001 - 122240 - 641210 -00000 0.00 39.60 0.00 39.60 793 3795 299 1/13 2112 20013294 348 9083 255 1/7 2/6 001 - 122240 - 641900 -00000 0.00 31.23 0.00 31.23 348 9083 255 1/7 2/6 20013294 304 0513 853 1 /10 2/9 001 - 122240 - 641900 -00000 0.00 34.15 0.00 34.15 304 0513 853 1 /10 2/9 20013294 643 6968 299 12/16 01/15 113 - 138900 - 641900 -00000 0.00 265.40 0.00 265.40 643 6968 299 12/16 01/15 20013294 774 6251 228 12/18 01/17 001 - 443010 - 641210 -00000 0.00 38.39 0.00 38.39 774 6251 228 12/18 01/17 20013294 101 1087 919 1/1 1/31 001 - 121143. 641400 -00000 0.00 473.10 0.00 473.10 101 1087 919 1/1 1/31 20013294 774 5607 574 1/19 2/18 408 - 253211 - 641100 -00000 0.00 27.77 0.00 27.77 774 5607 574 1/19 2/18 20013294 352 8323 717 1/13 2/12 001 - 122240 - 641900.00000 0.00 77.16 0.00 77.16 352 8323 717 1/13 2/12 20013294 774 5603 008 1/19 2/18 001- 144210 - 641900.00000 0.00 131.29 0.00 131.29 774 5603 008 1/19 2/18 20013294 643 9757 263 1/16 2/15 001- 121143 - 641400.00000 0.00 146.73 0.00 146.73 643 9757 263 1/16 2/15 20013294 793 0883 151 1/13 2112 521 - 122410 - 641400.00000 0.00 26.31 0.00 26.31 793 0883 151 1/13 2112 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 124 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013294 774 3602 412 1/19 2/18 001 - 010110 - 641210 -00000 0.00 34.06 0.00 34.06 774 3602 412 1/19 2/18 20013294 774 5952 219 12/19 01/18 001 - 443010 - 641210 -00000 0.00 28.52 0.00 28.52 774 5952 219 12/19 01/18 20013294 774 6470 5050 1/19 2/18 408. 233352- 641100 -00000 0.00 31.23 0.00 31.23 774 6470 5050 1/19 2/18 20013294 643 3266 004 12/16 01/15 113. 138900- 641900 -00000 0.00 38.16 0.00 38.16 643 3266 004 12/16 01/15 20013294 658 0783 565 1/13 2/12 001 - 122240 - 641210.00000 0.00 32.84 0.00 32.84 658 0783 565 1/13 2/12 20013294 774 6646 142 1/19 2118 001 - 172930 - 641900 -00000 0.00 38.25 0.00 38.25 774 6646 142 1/19 2/18 20013294 643 6870 870 1/16 2/15 001 - 155810 - 641900 -00000 0.00 28.88 0.00 28.88 643 6870 870 1/16 2/15 20013294 643 3099 953 1/16 2/15 470- 173441 - 641900 -00000 0.00 332.14 0.00 332.14 643 3099 953 1/16 2/15 20013294 093 2466 572 1/16 2/15 001 - 121143 - 641400 -00000 0.00 235.00 0.00 235.00 093 2466 572 1/16 2/15 20013294 530 7387 098 1/16 2/15 001 - 155410 - 641900 -00000 0.00 279.06 001 - 155410 - 641200 -00000 0.00 21.80 0.00 300.86 530 7387 098 1/16 2/15 20013294 455 6188 294 1 /10 2/9 408 - 253211 - 641100.00000 0.00 425.75 0.00 425.75 455 6188 294 1 /10 2/9 20013294 775 5592 091 1122 2121 001 - 156180- 641900 -00000 0.00 33.59 0.00 33.59 775 5592 091 1122 2121 20013294 775 2007 829 1/22 2/21 408 - 253212 - 641100 -00000 0.00 172.12 0.00 172.12 775 2007 829 1/22 2/21 20013294 394 3402 652 1/7 2/6 001 - 122240 - 641900 -00000 0.00 31.23 0.00 31.23 394 3402 652 1/7 2/6 20013294 352 3097 772 1/13 2112 490 - 144610 - 641900.00000 0.00 38.98 0.00 38.98 352 3097 772 1/13 2112 20013294 092 2087 866 1/16 2/15 441 - 256110- 641100 -00000 0.00 159.35 0.00 159.35 092 2087 866 1/16 2/15 20013294 352 7000 700 1/13 2112 408- 253221 - 641100 -00000 0.00 590.74 0.00 590.74 352 7000 700 1/13 2112 6J2wAGE 125 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20013294 455 4211 062 1 /10 2/9 490 - 144610 - 641900.00000 0.00 24.89 0.00 455 4211 062 1 /10 2/9 20013294 334 1040 979 1/4 2/3 001- 443010 - 641900 -00000 0.00 483.48 0.00 334 1040 979 1/4 2/3 20013294 434 5733 660 1/16 2/15 490 - 144610 - 641900 -00000 0.00 1.96 0.00 434 5733 660 1/16 2/15 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569716 VENDOR 278050 - SPRINT 20012740 C010903050 408 - 233351 - 641100 -00000 0.00 200.00 0.00 153312 REP.TEL.LINE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569671 VENDOR 255510 SPRINT FLORIDA, INC. 20012586 CUST 39100564 2102 188 - 140480 - 644600.00000 0.00 607.14 0.00 FEB 2002 201348 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569443 VENDOR 16420 ST FRANCIS ANIMAL CLINIC 20013192 02 -9593 T.GRAHAM 610 - 155410 - 631970.00000 0.00 75.00 0.00 201067 T.GRAHAM 02 -9593 1/29/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569532 VENDOR 149220 - STEELE TRUCK CENTER 20012454 56626 521 - 122410. 646425.00000 0.00 61.78 0.00 200933 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569809 VENDOR 326610 - STEVE PRESTON 20012592 1/18/02 TRVL S PRESTON 001 - 172910 - 640310 -00000 0.00 13.00 0.00 1/18/02 TRVL S PRESTON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569605 VENDOR 195260 - STEVEN A. MECKSTROTH 20012727 D.CRUSE 12117101 001 - 155930. 631210 -00000 0.00 33.80 0.00 153402 D.CRUSE 12/17/01 PHYS.FEE 6J2AGE 126 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569680 VENDOR 259420 - SUBSTANCE ABUSE CONSULTANTS P.C. 20012756 57247 12/31/01 001. 144510- 649990 -00000 0.00 5.00 0.00 153412 DRUG TEST CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569757 VENDOR 297940 SUBWAY 20012754 #399 9/11/01 001 - 121152 - 652210.00000 0.00 80.00 0.00 153048 FOOD CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569777 VENDOR 312170 SUCCESSORIES 20012470 21242902 111 - 156395 - 652990 -00000 0.00 1,016.89 0.00 203693 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569450 VENDOR 17800 SUMMIT HOME RESP. SVC, INC 20012455 E SOTO 1/7 001 - 155930 - 652810 -00000 0.00 213.75 0.00 201930 E SOTO 1/7 20012455 G KOGER 1/4 001 - 155930 - 652810.00000 0.00 55.00 0.00 201930 G KOGER 1/4 20012455 E SOTO 1/7 001 - 155930 - 652810.00000 0.00 213.75 0.00 201930 E SOTO 1/7 20012455 E SOTO 1/7 001 - 155930 - 652810.00000 0.00 80.03 0.00 201930 E SOTO 1/7 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569451 VENDOR 17820 SUMMIT MEDICAL SUPPLIES 20012456 161530 001 - 155930 - 652810 -00000 0.00 112.14 0.00 201931 SUPPLIES 20012456 160659 001 - 155930 - 652810 -00000 0.00 182.69 0.00 201931 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569359 VENDOR 262150 - SUN LIFE OF CANADA FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA I REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20013349 02102 ADVICE PLUS SVS 519 - 121670 - 645170 -00000 0.00 4,114.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569361 VENDOR 262150 - SUN LIFE OF CANADA 20013353 02/02 LTD PREMIUMS 519. 121680- 645180 -00000 0.00 32,260.89 AND CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 569360 VENDOR 262150 - SUN LIFE OF CANADA 20013350 02/02 CONVERSION 517 - 121640 - 645910.00000 0.00 1.341.75 AND CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 569362 VENDOR 262150 - SUN LIFE OF CANADA 20013354 02102 LIFE AD &D 517 - 121640. 645930 -00000 0.00 23,824.88 AND CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 569363 VENDOR 262150 - SUN LIFE OF CANADA 20013355 02/02 PREMIUMS 517 - 121640 - 645910 -00000 0.00 57,422.64 AND CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 569508 VENDOR 132010 - SUNCOAST FIRE & SAFETY EQUIP. 137.50 20012468 122550 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 86.00 201259 MAINT 0.00 275.00 20012468 122554 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 201259 MAINT 20012468 122589 001 - 122240 - 646281.00000 0.00 201259 MAINT 20012468 122561 001 - 122240. 646281.00000 0.00 201259 MAINT 20012468 122560 001 - 122240 - 646281.00000 0.00 201259 MAINT 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6J2AGE 127 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 4,114.00 4,114.00 32.260.89 32,260.89 1,341.75 1,341.75 23,824.88 23,824.88 57,422.64 57.422.64 305.00 0.00 305.00 137.50 0.00 137.50 86.00 0.00 86.00 275.00 0.00 275.00 213.50 0.00 213.50 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 1 6 J 2 AGE 128 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012468 122565 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 137.50 0.00 137.50 201259 MAINT 20012468 122562 001. 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 137.50 0.00 137.50 201259 MAINT 20012468 122559 001. 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 330.00 0.00 330.00 201259 MAINT 20012468 122557 001 - 122240- 646281 -00000 0.00 236.00 0.00 236.00 201259 MAINT 20012468 122587 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 265.00 0.00 265.00 201259 MAINT 20012468 122564 001 - 122240 - 646281.00000 0.00 137.50 0.00 137.50 201259 MAINT 20012468 122551 001 - 122240. 646281 -00000 0.00 91.50 0.00 91.50 201259 MAINT 20012468 122555 001 - 122240 - 646281.00000 0.00 420.00 0.00 420.00 201259 MAINT 20012468 122563 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 265.00 0.00 265.00 201259 MAINT 20012468 122552 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 255.00 0.00 255.00 201259 MAINT 20012468 122558 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 236.50 0.00 236.50 201259 MAINT 20012468 122556 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 137.50 0.00 137.50 201259 MAINT 20012468 122553 001 - 122240 - 646281 -00000 0.00 74.50 0.00 74.50 201259 MAINT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 3,740.50 CHECK NO 569449 VENDOR 17660 SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 20012461 386665 101 - 163630 - 652990.00000 0.00 43.34 0.00 43.34 200036 SUPPLIES 20013197 386738 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 40.78 0.00 40.78 200984 SUPPLIES 20013198 456651 001 - 156363 - 652990 -00000 0.00 1.34 0.00 1.34 201443 SUPPL. FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 129 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20012463 143249 001 - 122240 - 652990 -00000 0.00 4.30 0.00 4.30 201263 SUPPLIES 20013197 386756 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 44.75 0.00 44.75 200984 SUPPLIES 20013197 386756 111 - 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 93.89 0.00 93.89 200984 SUPPLIES 20013198 387067 001 - 156363 - 652990 -00000 0.00 1.12 0.00 1.12 201443 SUPPL. 20013197 386640 111. 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 19.79 0.00 19.79 200984 SUPPLIES 20012462 143403 778 - 182701- 652990 -00000 0.00 83.09 0.00 83.09 200086 SUPPLIES 20013197 386697 111 - 156332 - 652910.00000 0.00 10.79 0.00 10.79 200984 SUPPLIES 20013197 386541 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 20.97 0.00 20.97 200984 SUPPLIES 20012461 386658 101 - 163630 - 652990 -00000 0.00 145.82 0.00 145.82 200036 SUPPLIES 20013197 386782 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 35.07 0.00 35.07 200984 SUPPLIES 20013197 386640 111 - 156332 - 652910 -00000 0.00 152.99 0.00 152.99 200984 SUPPLIES 20013197 386697 111- 156332. 652990.00000 0.00 19.55 0.00 19.55 200984 SUPPLIES 20013197 387132 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 4.46 0.00 4.46 200984 SUPPLIES 20013197 386677 111 - 156332 - 652990 -00000 0.00 59.37 0.00 59.37 200984 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 781.42 CHECK NO 569611 VENDOR 200380 SUNSHINE ACE HARDWARE 20013195 386791 408 - 253211. 652990 -00000 0.00 2.64 0.00 2.64 200398 SUPPL. 20013194 386633 408 - 253212 - 652990 -00000 0.00 16.74 0.00 16.74 200281 SUPPL. FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100 -601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20013196 386623 200430 SUPPL. 20013196 386759 200430 SUPPL. 20013196 386652 200430 SUPPL. 20013195 386786 200398 SUPPL. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 408. 253221- 652990 -00000 0.00 408 - 253221 - 652990 -00000 0.00 408 - 253221. 652990 -00000 0.00 408 - 253211 - 652990 -00000 0.00 CHECK NO 569537 VENDOR 156260 - SURETY CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 20012441 11219 03 001 - 122240 - 762200 -00000 0.00 202407 REIM APP FEE 20012815 011231 -13 001 - 122240 - 646110 -00000 0.00 203452 CONST OF DECK 20012467 11231.11 001 - 122240 - 646110 -00000 0.00 201563 REPLACE METAL DOOR CHECK NO 569650 VENDOR 239980 - SUSAN L SATOW 20012597 12/5.31 TRVL S SATOW 111 - 156381 - 640200 -00000 0.00 12/5 -31 TRVL S SATOW CHECK NO 569590 VENDOR 185550 - SW FLORIDA ANESTHESIA PLUS 20012755 E.PINEDA 12/14/01 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 153403 E.PINEDA PHYS.FEE CHECK NO 569581 VENDOR 179250 - SW FLORIDA NEURODIAGNOSTICS INC. 20012758 B.DRILICH 12/21/01 001 - 155930 - 631990 -00000 0.00 153404 B.DRILICH PROF.FEE CHECK NO 569705 VENDOR 273600 - SWANA 16J2AGE 130 AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 11.74 0.00 11.74 33.73 0.00 33.73 76.52 0.00 76.52 6.11 0.00 6.11 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 147.48 568.69 0.00 568.69 12,858.00 0.00 12,858.00 3.828.00 0.00 3,828.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 17,254.69 46.40 0.00 46.40 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 46.40 178.75 0.00 178.75 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 178.75 228.80 0.00 228.80 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 228.80 6J2AGE 131 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012723 147296/57750 J.GO 470 - 173463 - 654210 -00000 0.00 121.00 0.00 REF# 152992, MEMB DUES F /GO 20012723 147293/57745 D.KIRK 470 - 173463 - 654210 -00000 0.00 121.00 0.00 152992 - MEMB DUES FOR KIRK CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569453 VENDOR 18690 T -SHIRT EXPRESS 20012728 28897 001. 156363 - 652110 -00000 0.00 22.00 0.00 153173 JACKET W /LOGO CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569452 VENDOR 18020 TAMIAMI FORD INC 20013191 33211 470 - 173410 - 764110 -00000 0.00 24,969.14 0.00 202896 F 150 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569365 VENDOR 308680 TAMPA MARRIOTT WATERSIDE 20013263 83369620 J PAGE 118 - 144210 - 640300 -33781 0.00 530.00 0.00 AND CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569859 VENDOR 343040 - TBE GROUP, INC. 20013204 043988 REVISED 1110102 313 - 163673 - 631400 -60109 0.00 13,862.50 0.00 107422 10 /1- 10/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569585 VENDOR 179970 - THE BEACHWOOD SOCIETY, INC. 20012757 P.EVANS 1110102 001 - 155930 - 634150.00000 0.00 300.00 0.00 153405 P.EVANS BURIAL CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569759 VENDOR 298860 - THE EQUIPMENT BOOKIE 20012896 6390 521 - 122410 - 646425 -00000 0.00 113.44 0.00 200706 WATER PUMP /GASKET CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6J2AGE 132 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK NO 569631 VENDOR 223930 - THE HILLER GROUP, INC. 20012921 100960 IN 1/8 495.192370- 642415 -00000 0.00 10,106.63 0.00 200147 1/8 20012920 1009364 IN 1/9 200145 495 - 192370 - 642416 -00000 0.00 8,473.48 0.00 200145 1/19 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569440 VENDOR 14880 - THE PHOTO LAB 20012610 78845 001 - 155410 - 647210 -00000 0.00 34.00 0.00 201253 FILM, 1 /11 20012610 78848 001. 155410- 647210 -00000 0.00 10.90 0.00 201253 FILM PROCESSING, 1 /11 20012610 78894 001 - 155410 - 647210 -00000 0.00 9.70 0.00 201253 FILM PROCESSING, 1 /11 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569737 VENDOR 286390 - THE PRINT SHOP 20012620 53804 001 - 000000 - 142900 -00000 0.00 83.73 0.00 200051 PRINT JOB, 1 /10 20012620 53490 001 - 000000 - 142900.00000 0.00 154.02 0.00 200051 PRINT JOB, 1/14 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569776 VENDOR 311320 - THE TROPHY CASE OF NAPLES 20012745 9756 517 - 121640 - 649990 -00000 0.00 45.00 0.00 153346 AWARD PLAQUE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569824 VENDOR 331570 - THOMAS STORRAR 20012593 1/14 -17 TRVL T STORRAR 001 - 144110 - 640300.00000 0.00 84.00 0.00 1/14 -17 TRVL T STORRAR CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569492 VENDOR 118280 - THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP 20012750 5917260/1245418 001 - 122240 - 654110 -00000 0.00 283.50 0.00 152722 COMPL.HANDBOOK 6J2AGE 133 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569701 VENDOR 271800 - TILDEN LOBNITZ & COOPER, INC. 20011876 143200 414 - 263611 - 631400 -74039 0.00 1,766.28 0.00 4416 TO 12/28/01 20010928 143201 414 - 263611 - 631400.74015 0.00 600.00 0.00 4475 TO 12128101 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569522 VENDOR 142340 - TINDALE, OLIVER & ASSOCIATES INC. 20011884 #15 313. 163673 - 763100 -60172 0.00 2,247.10 0.00 2750 12 -1 THRU 12 -31 -01 20013284 #15 REVISED 313. 163673- 763100 -60172 0.00 2,000.00 0.00 2750 12/1 - 12/31/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569885 VENDOR 348580 - TONI SANTOS, INC. 20012872 S.SHEPHARD 12/13- 12/21/01 001 - 155930 - 631210.00000 0.00 181.35 0.00 153406 S.SHEPHARD 12/13 - 12/21/01 20012872 S.SHEPHARD 12/26- 1/3/02 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 181.35 0.00 153406 S.SHEPHARD 12/26- 1/3/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569649 VENDOR 239650 - TOTAL COMMUNICATION CONCEPTS GROUP, 20012748 1833 001 - 156110. 634999 -00000 0.00 115.91 0.00 153040 WIRING 20012738 1841 001 - 156110 - 634999 -00000 0.00 93.75 0.00 153205 WIRING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569679 VENDOR 259320 - TOTAL SURGERY CENTER 20012761 S.POWELL 12/20/01 001 - 155930 - 634101.00000 0.00 731.25 0.00 153407 S.POWELL HOSP.OUT PAT. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569747 VENDOR 290610 - TRANE 6J2wAGE 134 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20013189 305937 001. 122240 - 634999 -00000 0.00 4,672.00 0.00 202233 MAINT 20013189 303451 001. 122240 - 634999 -00000 0.00 4,672.00 0.00 202233 MAINT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569736 VENDOR 286250 TRIGG INDUSTRIES INTERNATIONAL INC 20012741 13742 101 - 163630 - 652910 -00000 0.00 331.00 0.00 151052 ROAD TUBE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569795 VENDOR 321500 TRISEP CORPORATION 20012752 973748 408. 253221 - 652310 -00000 0.00 968.30 0.00 152095 FERT. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569587 VENDOR 182050 TROPIC SUPPLY INC. 20013190 89287 001 - 122240 - 652996 -00000 0.00 14.35 0.00 201256 SUPPLIES 20013190 89434 001- 122240 - 652996.00000 0.00 152.44 0.00 201256 SUPPLIES 20013190 89260 001 - 122240 - 652996 -00000 0.00 13.10 0.00 201256 SUPPLIES 20013190 88395 001 - 122240 - 652996 -00000 0.00 94.00 0.00 201256 SUPPLIES 20013190 88394 001 - 122240 - 652996 -00000 0.00 1,500.59 0.00 201256 SUPPLIES 20013190 89586 001 - 122240 - 652996 -00000 0.00 22.60 0.00 201256 SUPPLIES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569553 VENDOR 162300 TROPICAL FENCE 20012759 30590 408- 233352 - 649990 -00000 0.00 150.15 0.00 151431 REP.OF FENCE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 135 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 569871 VENDOR 345310 - TRUGREEN LANDCARE 20012751 1851865263 001 - 122240 - 646314 -00000 0.00 970.00 0.00 970.00 151624 MAIN.LANDSCAPING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 970.00 CHECK NO 569645 VENDOR 237380 U.S. FILTER /DAVIS PROCESS DIVISION 20012720 8915391 408 - 233312 - 652310 -00000 0.00 6,435.00 0.00 6,435.00 200709 CHEM. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 6,435.00 CHECK NO 569842 VENDOR 337200 UAP TIMBERLAND, LLC 20012735 107777 109 - 182602 - 652310 -00000 0.00 980.00 0.00 980.00 201650 COPPER SULFATE 20012734 107925 109 - 182602 - 652310 -00000 0.00 980.00 0.00 980.00 201650 COPPER SULFATE 20012765 108511 109. 182602- 652310 -00000 0.00 980.00 0.00 980.00 201650 COPPER SULFATE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,940.00 CHECK NO 569808 VENDOR 326460 UNIFIRST CORP. 20012871 28296 408 - 233351 - 652110 -00000 0.00 500.07 0.00 500.07 203368 UNIFORMS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 500.07 CHECK NO 569844 VENDOR 338010 UNITED ENGINEERING CORPORATION 20011880 #15 411 - 273511 - 763100 -70054 0.00 636,841.54 0.00 636,841.54 106019 THRU 11/30/01 20011880 #15 RETAINAGE 411 - 000000- 205100 -00000 0.00 63,684.15- 0.00 63,684.15- 106019 THRU 11/30/01 RETAINAGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 573,157.39 CHECK NO 569454 VENDOR 18900 - UNITED PARCEL SERVICE 20013347 363797032 001 - 000000 - 142900.00000 0.00 261.94 0.00 261.94 200056 SHIPPING 20012722 363797012 001 - 000000 - 142900 -00000 0.00 115.56 0.00 115.56 200056 SHIPPING F1 6J2AGE 136 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20013335 363797042 001- 000000. 142900 -00000 0.00 124.05 0.00 200056 SHIPPING CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569723 VENDOR 282270 - UNITED RENTAL 20012732 22347376 -002 101 - 163620 - 644600.00000 0.00 600.00 0.00 202305 RENT.EQUIPM. 20012733 23062320 -001 101 - 163620 - 644600 -00000 0.00 28.00 0.00 152833 RENT.EQUIP. 20013336 23095678 -001 408 - 253211 - 644600 -00000 0.00 36.00 0.00 201826 TOOLS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569790 VENDOR 318860 US BIOSYSTEMS. INC. 20013247 90387 470 - 173432 - 634999 -00000 0.00 182.00 0.00 201902 CHEM. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569893 VENDOR 350080 VALVE AND ACTUATION SERV LLC 20012726 1000417 -01 408 - 253221 - 652990.00000 0.00 502.15 0.00 152094 TORQUE SWITCH,EL.PARTS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569477 VENDOR 111900 VICKIE WILSON 20013266 1/8 -31 TRLV V WILSON 111 - 156390 - 640200 -00000 0.00 54.23 0.00 1/8.31 TRVL V WILSON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569455 VENDOR 19260 VICS SHOE REPAIR 20012729 9060000189 490 - 144610- 652110 -00000 0.00 157.25 0.00 200116 SHOES 20012729 9060000185 490 - 144610 - 652110 -00000 0.00 157.25 0.00 200116 SHOES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569695 VENDOR 269190 VICTOR R. RODRIGUEZ CHECK NO 569654 VENDOR 246170 - W.E. JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO. FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 137 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013331 0000 SVS 1/29/02 001 - 157110 - 634999.00000 0.00 16.00 0.00 16.00 201672 0000 SVS 1/29/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 16.00 CHECK NO 569688 VENDOR 264290 - VINCENTE PINERO'S TRACTOR 20013100 2001110005 111 - 138911 - 634804.00000 0.00 55.00 0.00 55.00 2001110005 20013100 80527053 111 - 138911- 634804 -00000 0.00 5,560.00 0.00 5,560.00 80527053 20013100 2001090583 111 - 138911 - 634804 -00000 0.00 195.00 0.00 195.00 2001090583 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 5.810.00 CHECK NO 569905 VENDOR 350960 VISION SERVICE PLAN -(IC) 20013352 02102 VISION PREMIUM 517. 121640 - 645910 -00000 0.00 2,708.42 0.00 2,708.42 02/02 PREMIUM CHECK TOTAL 0.00 2,708.42 CHECK NO 569835 VENDOR 334620 VOPAK USA INC 20012721 TA- 619471 408. 253211- 652310 -00000 0.00 825.00 0.00 825.00 203353 CHEM. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 825.00 CHECK NO 569591 VENDOR 185990 VWR SCIENTIFIC 20012724 9673777 408- 233350 - 652990 -00000 0.00 64.68 0.00 64.68 200727 LAB.SUPPL. 20012725 9675989 408 - 253211 - 652990 -00000 0.00 68.29 0.00 68.29 200403 LAB.CHEM. 20013261 8778055 114 - 178975 - 652910 -00000 0.00 1,027.56 0.00 1,027.56 200352 LAB.SUPPL. 20012724 9657695 408 - 233350 - 652990.00000 0.00 541.13 0.00 541.13 200727 LAB.SUPPL. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,701.66 CHECK NO 569654 VENDOR 246170 - W.E. JOHNSON EQUIPMENT CO. 6J2AGE 138 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20012869 410840 408 - 233351 - 646970 -00000 0.00 132.79 0.00 200805 REP.& MAINT. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569815 VENDOR 328140 WACO FILTERS 20012719 142951 408. 253221- 652990 -00000 0.00 6,431.04 0.00 203805 FILTERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569456 VENDOR 19440 WAL -MART PHARMACY 20013246 RX 10/16. 10/31/01 001 - 155930 - 652710.00000 0.00 14,401.63 0.00 201913 10/16- 10/31/01 RX 20013246 RX 11 /1- 11/15/01 001 - 155930 - 652710.00000 0.00 18,474.80 0.00 201913 RX 11 /1- 11/15/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569574 VENDOR 173290 - WAL -MART PHARMACY #10 -1957 20013337 #10 -1957 12/1. 12/31/01 001 - 155930 - 652710 -00000 0.00 6,242.13 0.00 201925 12/1- 12/31/01 RX CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569837 VENDOR 335990 WALGREEN COMPANY 20013091 216330 12/15- 12/31/01 001 - 155930 - 652710 -00000 0.00 615.88 0.00 153408 RX CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569921 VENDOR 900080 WALTER E RASCHE 301139 AMB REF 0133963.2 RASCHE 490 - 000000 - 116004 -00000 0.00 60.08 0.00 RASCHE AMB REF 9/29/01 CK 4535 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569474 VENDOR 109110 - WASTE MGMT OF COLLIER COUNTY 20013078 8657878/160984 12/2.1/31 001 - 156175 - 643300 -00000 0.00 511.87 0.00 8657878/160984 12/2. 1/31/02 20013087 1503271/161605 01/02 001 - 156363 - 643300.00000 0.00 403.03 0.00 1503271/161605 01102 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 139 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013087 1487276/161206 01/02 001. 122240- 643300 -00000 0.00 311.11 0.00 311.11 1487276/161206 01102 20013085 1484889/161195 01/02 001. 061010- 643300 -00000 0.00 39.71 0.00 39.71 1484889/161195 01102 20013085 1485915/161198 01/02 408 - 233352 - 643300 -00000 0.00 669.37 0.00 669.37 1485915/161198 01/02 20013085 1492687/161590 01102 111 - 156332 - 643300 -00000 0.00 579.32 0.00 579.32 1492687/161590 01/02 20013085 1484692/161194 01102 408 - 233312 - 643300.00000 0.00 149.94 0.00 149.94 1484692/161194 01102 20013086 1487705/161580 01102 111 - 156332 - 643300 -00000 0.00 714.14 0.00 714.14 1487705/161580 01102 20013086 1487667/161578 01/02 001 - 156363 - 643300 -00000 0.00 327.48 0.00 327.48 1487667/161578 01/02 20013087 8657645/161360 01102 001 - 122240 - 643300 -00000 0.00 126.00 0.00 126.00 8657645/161360 01/02 20013086 2392759/159292 01/02 001 - 156160 - 643300 -00000 0.00 89.50 0.00 89.50 2392759/159292 01/02 20013087 149632/161968 01102 146 - 144380 - 643300.00000 0.00 10.52 0.00 10.52 149632/161968 01102 20013087 1501694/161604 01102 001. 156363- 643300 -00000 0.00 327.48 0.00 327.48 1501694/161604 01102 20013085 1484889/161195 01102 490 - 144610 - 643300.00000 0.00 37.19 0.00 37.19 1484889/161195 01102 20013086 8656840/161665 01/02 111 - 156332 - 643300 -00000 0.00 217.94 0.00 217.94 8656840/161665 01102 20013085 1486636/161202 01/02 408 - 253212 - 643300 -00000 0.00 403.03 0.00 403.03 1486636/161202 01/02 20013086 1488426/161582 01102 111 - 156332 - 643300.00000 0.00 126.00 0.00 126.00 1488426/161582 01102 20013085 8657533/161356 01/02 490 - 144610 - 643300.00000 0.00 10.52 0.00 10.52 8657533/161356 01102 20013085 8656743/161317 01102 408- 253212 - 643300 -00000 0.00 126.00 0.00 126.00 8656743/161317 01102 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 140 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013086 2328597/161639 01102 001 - 156363 - 643300 -00000 0.00 403.03 0.00 403.03 2328597/161639 01102 20013086 2392724/159291 01102 001 - 156180 - 643300 -00000 0.00 89.50 0.00 89.50 2392724/159291 01102 20013087 8657481/161352 01102 001 - 122240 - 643300 -00000 0.00 217.94 0.00 217.94 8657481/161352 01102 20013086 1501996/160426 01/02 109. 182602- 643300 -00000 0.00 54.85 0.00 54.85 1501996/160426 01102 20013085 1494949/161594 01102 001 - 156363 - 643300 -00000 0.00 765.67 0.00 765.67 1494949/161594 01/02 20013086 2307557/161637 01/02 111. 156332- 643300 -00000 0.00 14.85 0.00 14.85 2307557/161637 01102 20013087 1505851/161610 01102 001. 156363- 643300 -00000 0.00 183.90 0.00 183.90 1505851/161610 01102 20013084 2275574/161290 01102 101. 163620 - 634999 -00000 0.00 183.90 0.00 183.90 201133 2275574/161290 01/02 20013086 1478943/161558 01102 130 - 157710 - 643300 -00000 0.00 238.10 0.00 238.10 1478943/161558 01102 20013086 1507838/159254 01102 001 - 156145 - 643300 -00000 0.00 10.52 0.00 10.52 1507838/159254 01102 20013083 1602415/161528 01/02 495 - 192350. 643300 -00000 0.00 89.50 0.00 89.50 201772 1602416/161528 01102 20013086 1481553/159206 01102 001 - 156140 - 643300.00000 0.00 10.52 0.00 10.52 1481553/159206 01102 20013086 2160394/161622 01102 111 - 156332 - 643300.00000 0.00 126.00 0.00 126.00 2160394/161622 01102 20013082 1499673/161235 01102 521 - 122410 - 643300.00000 0.00 217.94 0.00 217.94 200712 1499673/161235 01/02 20013085 8657431/160161 01102 001 - 155410 - 643300 -00000 0.00 238.10 0.00 238.10 8657431/160161 01102 20013086 1508117/161612 01102 111 - 156332 - 643300 -00000 0.00 311.11 0.00 311.11 1508117/161612 01102 20013086 1501996/160426 01102 109 - 182901- 643300 -00000 0.00 163.09 0.00 163.09 1501996/160426 01102 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2 AGE 141 REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET 20013085 1484684/161193 01102 408 - 253211. 643300.00000 0.00 217.94 0.00 217.94 1484684/161193 01102 20013085 2214338/161286 01/02 408. 253221 - 643300 -00000 0.00 126.00 0.00 126.00 2214338/161286 01/02 20013085 1586193/161267 01102 408. 233351- 643300 -00000 0.00 126.00 0.00 126.00 1586193/161267 01102 20013085 1487683/161579 01102 111 - 156332 - 643300 -00000 0.00 641.13 0.00 641.13 1487683/161579 01102 20013085 1484889/161195 01/02 001 - 000000 - 115400 -00000 0.00 49.10 0.00 49.10 1484889/161195 01102 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 9,658.84 CHECK NO 569457 VENDOR 19530 WAUSAU TILE 20012737 198093 001 - 156363 - 646316 -00000 0.00 1,081.00 0.00 1,081.00 204062 TOPS & LINERS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,081.00 CHECK NO 569714 VENDOR 276690 WEATHER SERVICES INTERNATIONAL 20013093 336162 1 /1- 1/31/02 001 - 144510 - 644620.00000 0.00 147.00 0.00 147.00 200565 EQUIP.LEASE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 147.00 CHECK NO 569676 VENDOR 256920 WEST GROUP 20013098 800960543 001 - 421030 - 654110.00000 0.00 90.00 0.00 90.00 153367 BOOKS 20013089 800957988 12/4- 1/3/02 001 - 421060 - 654110.00000 0.00 10.00 0.00 10.00 153206 COURT RULES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 100.00 CHECK NO 569458 VENDOR 19660 WEST PUBLISHING PAYMENT CENTER 20013092 800875327 11/26- 12/25/01 001 - 443010- 654110 -00000 0.00 474.00 0.00 474.00 200995 REF.MAT 11/26- 12/25/01 20013090 800962451 12/4. 1/3/02 681 - 421510 - 654110 -00000 0.00 20.00 0.00 20.00 201324 12/4- 1/3/02 BOOKS 20013092 801004552 12/1. 12/31/01 001 - 443010 - 654110 -00000 0.00 1,224.00 0.00 1,224.00 200995 REF.MAT 12/1- 12/31/01 6J2AGE 142 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100 -601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20013090 800957703 12/4- 1/3/02 681 - 421510 - 654110 -00000 0.00 460.00 0.00 201324 12/4- 1/3/02 BOOKS CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569550 VENDOR 161430 - WESTWIND CONTRACTING 20011877 #2 496 - 192340 - 763100 -33327 0.00 27,372.60 0.00 202280 THRU 12/21/01 20011877 #2 RETAINAGE 496 - 000000 - 205100 -00000 0.00 2,737.26- 0.00 202280 THRU 12/21/01 RETAINAGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569586 VENDOR 180010 WHITE SANDS VETERINARY CLINIC 20013348 01.9261 C.GUY 610. 155410- 631970 -00000 0.00 60.00 0.00 201087 C.GUY 01 -9261 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569753 VENDOR 294150 WHITE'S AMERICAN FERTILIZER AND 20012870 16132 408 - 233351 - 652310.00000 0.00 66.24 0.00 152848 FERT. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569843 VENDOR 337490 WILCOX APPRAISAL SERVICES, INC. 20013339 01 -09 -02 PAR. #1 APPR.RPT. 368 - 116360. 631650.80604 0.00 3,500.00 0.00 204216 01 -09 -02 PARCEL #1 APPR.RPT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569593 VENDOR 186530 WILLIAM J. VARIAN CONSTRUCTION CO. 20012736 #19 12/14/01 001 - 121143 - 634999 -00000 0.00 4,550.00 0.00 202140 LABOR & MAT. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569909 VENDOR 351140 WILLIAM JACKSON 20012599 1/13 -18 TRVL W JACKSON 301. 121125- 640300 -01017 0.00 173.00 0.00 1/13 -18 TRVL W JACKSON CHECK TOTAL 0.00 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 16J2AGE 143 REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC VCHR NET CHECK NO 569901 VENDOR 350800 - WILLIAM TEUNIS 20013079 COMP.INST.1 /8- 1/31/02 111 - 156380 - 634999 -00000 0.00 312.00 0.00 312.00 204122 COMP.INST.1 /8- 1/31/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 312.00 CHECK NO 569918 VENDOR 900040 - WILLIAM WADE 301201 05400010502 W.WADE 408 - 000000- 115001 -00000 0.00 262.30 0.00 262.30 05400010502 W.WADE CR.REFUND 0 /PMT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 262.30 CHECK NO 569694 VENDOR 267390 - WILLIAMS SCOTSMAN INC 20013094 20763806 1/22 - 2/21/02 001 - 122240 - 634999 -00000 0.00 1,015.00 0.00 1,015.00 202504 RENT STEPS /RAMP CHECK TOTAL 0.00 1,015.00 CHECK NO 569459 VENDOR 19770 - WILSON MILLER ET AL 20011890 0050056 331. 163650- 631400 -60111 0.00 40,841.00 0.00 40.841.00 6407 THRU 12/28/01 20011887 0050220 313- 163673 - 763100 -60172 0.00 37.51 0.00 37.51 4013 THRU 12/28/01 20013202 0049138 325 - 172921 - 631400 -31005 0.00 9,731.46 0.00 9.731.46 103342 THRU 11/30/01 20013201 0050357 313. 163673- 631400 -65071 0.00 12,210.00 0.00 12,210.00 107419 THRU 12/28/01 20011888 0050086 414 - 263611 - 631400.74023 0.00 17.50 0.00 17.50 4567 THRU 12/28/01 20011889 0050054 313 - 163673 - 631400.63041 0.00 33,765.03 0.00 33,765.03 4578 THRU 12/28/01 20013200 0050365 313 - 163673 - 631400.62081 0.00 76,826.40 0.00 76,826.40 102190 THRU 12/28/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 173,428.90 CHECK NO 569756 VENDOR 297010 WILSON MILLER INC 20011126 0050288 414 - 263611 - 631400.73032 0.00 3,036.00 0.00 3.036.00 104599 TO 12/28/01 6J2AGE 144 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA REPORT 100.601 BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC AMT NET VCHR DISC 20013287 0047621 313 - 163673 - 763100 -60016 0.00 11,197.00 0.00 107292 TO 10/26/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569503 VENDOR 130660 WILSON, MILLER ET AL 20011885 0050362 109 - 182602 - 631400 -00000 0.00 4,697.50 0.00 202719 THRU 12/28/01 20011886 0050324 109 - 182602 - 631400 -00000 0.00 3,620.90 0.00 202719 THRU 11/30/01 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569786 VENDOR 315760 WOMEN'S HEALTHCARE PHYSICIANS 20013081 A.ALFARO 1/3/02 001 - 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 150.80 0.00 201926 A.ALFARO 1/3/02 20013338 K.KEELING 1110102 001. 155930- 631210 -00000 0.00 2.561.00 0.00 201926 K.KEELING 1/10/02 20013338 K.KEELING 1/3/02 001- 155930 - 631210 -00000 0.00 66.95 0.00 201926 K.KEELING 1/3/02 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569527 VENDOR 146770 - WOOLEY'S RADIATOR REPAIR 20013096 10076 521 - 122410- 646425 -00000 0.00 351.60 0.00 200939 SUPPL. CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569894 VENDOR 350130 - WORLD AT WORK 20012717 REGIST T WIDES 5/16 -17 001- 121810 - 640300 -00000 0.00 275.00 0.00 153049 REGIST T WIDES CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569798 VENDOR 322200 - XEROX ADVANCED BUSINESS EQUIPMENT 20013088 492 113 - 138312 - 764990.00000 0.00 2,421.00 0.00 204104 COPY /PRINT /SCAN /FAX CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569870 VENDOR 345230 - XEROX ENGINEERING SYSTEMS VCHR NET 11,197.00 14,233.00 4,697.50 3,620.90 8,318.40 150.80 2,561.00 66.95 2,778.75 351.60 351.60 275.00 275.00 2,421.00 2,421.00 FEBRUARY 06, 2002 REPORT 100.601 VOUCHER DESCRIPTION 20013095 591329648 202180 LEASE COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SPECIAL DETAILED CHECK REGISTER FOR CHECKS DATED FEBRUARY 05, 2002 ACCOUNT NO AMT DISC 113 - 138931. 644620 -00000 0.00 16J2 AGE 145 AMT NET VCHR DISC 836.01 0.00 CHECK TOTAL 0.00 CHECK NO 569820 VENDOR 330260 - YORK INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION 20013343 DB176434 RETAIN. RELEASE 355 - 000000- 205100 -00000 0.00 8,486.50 103991 RETAINAGE RELEASE CHECK TOTAL CHECK NO 569460 VENDOR 20020 - YOUNGQUIST BROTHERS, INC. 20010930 FOUR 411 - 273511 - 763100 -70054 0.00 491,775.00 105568 TO 12/25/01 20010930 FOUR RETAINAGE 411. 000000- 205100 -00000 0.00 49,177.50- 105568 TO 12/25/01 RETAINAGE CHECK TOTAL 0.00 0.00 VCHR NET 836.01 836.01 8,486.50 8,486.50 0.00 491,775.00 0.00 49,177.50- 0.00 442,597.50 CHECK NO 569461 VENDOR 20050 - ZEE MEDICAL SERVICE 20013097 89162659 198. 157410 - 652990 -00000 0.00 37.85 0.00 37.85 152789 FIRST AID KIT 20013099 89162660 001. 121710- 652990 -00000 0.00 24.95 0.00 24.95 200529 FIRST AID KIT CHECK TOTAL 0.00 62.80 538 CHECKS WRITTEN GRAND TOTAL 0.00 6,351,676.16 16J2 Q: /Manual Checks /APMLOG BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A/P Manual Check Log DATE ISSUED TO: CK # AMOUNT DESCRIPTION 1130/2002 Chaffy, Passidomo, Wilson & Johnson, LLP 318 4,552,577.95 1/30/2002 Guy Carlton Tax Collector 319 2,694.36 1/30/2002 Collar County Dept. Revenue 320 611.69 1/31/2002 Charlotte Rhodes 321 84.29 2/4/2002 Federal Emergency Management Agency 322 2,250.00 2/5/2002 Check Run Beginning 569344 2/5/2002 Check Run Ending 569922 16J 2 THE OCHOPEE FIRE CONTROL DISTRICT ADVISORY BOARD MEETING HELD JANUARY 7, 2002 IN THE FIRE CHIEF'S OFFICE AT THE EVERGLADES FIRE STATION In attendance were the following: lA ire Chief David Loving, Chairman, Everglades City Advisory Board Member Kent Omer, Chokoloskee Island Advisory Board Member John Pennell, Plantation Island Advisory Board Member Hugo Sims, New Advisory Board Member for Everglades City The meeting was called to order at 7:06PM. A motion was made by Kent Omer to accept the minutes as submitted and it was seconded by John Pennell then passed. Old Business: Chief Wilson said he has hired Jerry Hooks full time. We still have one full time position open and we have six applicants. We are going to set up a test and try to fill the position that will bring us up to twelve. Three per day plus two spares to cover people that are out. Then this up coming budget year we are going to try to put four on per day. We are mandated by 17.10, 17.20. New Business: Chief Wilson made reference to the pilt fund and that he met with Mr. Storrar, Emer. Services Director, Myself, Mr. Mike Smykowski, Budget Director, Chris Dublis, Budget Analyst put together the budget's version of the pilt fund review and recommendations. In the County Managers office we are going to hash out. He wants to bring back a conclusion rather than conjecture at the next board meeting. Kent Omer said in the previous meeting in October you mentioned something about doing away with the pilt funds. LtiJsc. Comes: Page 1 v2-- Q��e: r T! Gcid1;v'S ICJ: 16J 2 Chief Wilson said we are looking to do some cuts in the pilt fund. We are talking about percentile again and try to come up with a formula as to how they would give what to what. So that is where he is carrying the voice of reason. Right now there is a proposal on the table by the budget office to reduce our pilt funds by $104,000 on the right side and $168,000 on the heavy side. David Loving said you can bring that to us can't you before they made a decision. Chief Wilson said yes, this is something that would be open until the budget is finalized. We start the budget cycle in March; actually he will start preparing it next month. March he will have his first meeting. He will get a fell how the County Manager is faring either towards our version of it, which is factual, or their version of it, which is out in left field. Our budget cycle runs from October to October, which is what they use the money on. But they went to the Sheriff's Office and pulled calls that ran from January to January so their numbers are different from our numbers, 77 calls. They are showing another agency with just four calls less than us but we ran 100 plus fires that they didn't go to. Kent Omer said you mean they are trying to cut our budget. Chief Wilson said yes they are trying to cut our budget and shift the money towards other agencies. It's not that they are looking to do that, what is going on is that the budget manager has been tasked with finding means to bolster the general fund. The pilt funds are transferred into the general fund directly so they show that as a general fund transfer to us, even though it is pilt payment with taxes and not really general fund. He has been tasked to devise a formula to dispense this money. He has an analyst that doesn't know the concept of this area. We are the only ones that can look at an address and tell you whether it is in the taxing side or non - taxing side so how can he defer the calls in the first place. The fact that he is using January-to- January call logs with October -to- October money that is another skew. We are showing a 577 to 663call increase from the 1999/2000 and we did the 2000/2001 call volume as well. We have had a25% increase in call volume this past year. So there are a lot of factors that the County Manager is going to have to toss around before he makes a decision. He has been fair so far so he feels they should give him a chance to look over the information. David Loving asked about the Seafood Festival is everything set with that, are they doing the same thing as last year. Chief Wilson said we will pretty much be doing the same thing as last year. The Everglades Fire Auxiliary puts on the booth at the Festival and basically we work in the booth for them and that's where they usually transfer around $3,000 or a little bit more or less depending on what their take is into the Volunteer account. Then we use that money to buy equipment or sponsor some of the children's parties' stuff like that around town. Everything is community driven here with in the limits of the law and that's the way this Department will operate as long as I am here. Page 2 16J 2 Kent Omer asked the booth that you have at the fair do you contribute money there. Chief Wilson said the Everglades Fire Auxiliary is that in name sake only they are only a fund raising organization that operates on it's own they have no connections or ties to Ochopee Fire Control District. They have their own board and everything. What they did is they came to us and said if your Volunteers will work in the booth for us we'll guarantee you $3500 of our profit. We said okay the volunteers will work it and we'll put that money in the Volunteer account. He distributed almost $10,000 worth of Volunteer gear in the last three or four months just from monies collected like that. The Volunteers had a fish fry here this summer and collected another $1800 or so there. He traded in six channel 800 analog radios for the type we are carrying now, which are $2800 a piece on an even trade. Kent Omer said they are trying to do away with all those analog. Chief Wilson said yes, they are mandated by the FCC for them to go digital to make room on the airways. Kent Omer brought up the new vehicle that Chief Wilson is supposed to receive. Chief Wilson said he got the Expedition and we have received the final papers from FEMA. It looks like we are positively being looked at for replacement of that second vehicle that was damaged during Gabrielle. It would be 75% FEMA, 12.5% State and 12.5% Ochopee Fire Control District would be the purchase plan. Then we would walk away with a 2002 Suburban instead of a 1995 Suburban that has been in salt water. Kent Omer asked what is going on with the Port of the Islands Station. Chief Wilson said it was still on the back burner. He said the developer came to us said that they would give us the land and $25,000 towards developing it. We'll get the residence to help then and you help and we'll build you a station out there. In the two years that this has been going on the property has changed hands eight times. We have never seen the $25,000. Hugo Sims asked where 911 was out here. Chief Wilson said actually all 911's are typed into the Sheriff's system at the Government Center in Naples. It is the E911 system; the addresses and names pop up. We have received the other brush truck it is in full operation now; it was painted through the summer. We did $10,000 of over hall and up grade to it. We still have the little attack truck. Page 3 16J 2 Kent Omer asked if David Loving was ever approved for Chairman. Chief Wilson said he was tentatively approved or quorum approved for Chairman that carries. There is an item he has to take care of tomorrow in reference to Sue Filson sending an e-mail to his boss saying that we only had one active board member. He told his boss they approved Hugo Sims in November, Jack reapplied, we got that back. He said Dave still had a year to reapply and Kent Omer reapplied. He just got a letter from Sammy that was sent to the Commissioner recommending that David Loving stay on the board. He addressed Hugo Sims by telling him in the past this board was not heard from and he has set out to change that. He got it back to what you guys say mean something and accounts for something. Hugo Sims asked if we had any fund raising projects. Chief Wilson said as ourselves as a Fire Department we cannot so we let the Volunteers do it. There is only 11 paid guys and myself and that is by no means to run a fire operations effectively. We probably have 18 or 20 Volunteers on the books but six to eight that respond every time. Some times it is a mix and match of what will show up. He stated that as of April 2002 there will be a law in place mandating two and two out with fire command on the ground. He explained two go in and two remain out side ready to go in if the other two have to be rescued. That means full packed out breathing apparatus ready to go. The only alleviation we got out of that was that the command Could be part of this Rapid Intervention Team as long as it didn't interfere with the operation of command so that is why everyone is saying stick with the five don't try to get away with the four. OSHA has already approved this the way the bill reads from April 1, 2002 to six month the Departments need to get ready and do what ever needs to be done. Some very extraneous circumstances will be able to operate after October 1, 2002 with out the proper manpower but with the understanding that if an accident happens OSHA is going to clean your clock and so will the family. You have no leg to stand on. Hugo Sims said since the 9 -11 -01 deal that their would be some sympathy in the County budget for the Fire Department. Page 4 16J 2 Chief Wilson said they can't do it we are a NTSU special taxing District Florida Statute clearly states they cannot use general fund money to support us in any way shape or form. What we are trying to do is receive some of that federal grant money that is out there. But that money is more focused on equipment than manpower. You can use it for manpower. They want to see the equipment purchased that is going to protect you from anthrax. That is going to let you isolate and entire house or building. We carry level B suits right now, but we need level A suits to be fully compliant to what they want. So that's why we will be applying for lots of their money this year. So that is what we are facing 17.10/17.20. He has known this is coming for 4 or 5 years and very carefully have been staging for people to be hired. We have brought the shifts up to three. If there are no budget cuts he will hire the necessary people for there to be four on shift every day with him as the fifth person making us in compliance. He said there are other Cities that pay 6, 8, or 9 mils for less service. David Loving brought up approving Hugo Sims. Chief Wilson said he was tentatively approved until they spoke to him. You can make a final recommendation for next meeting or now. A motion was made to approve Hugo Sims and was passed. Kent Omer wanted to know what was going on with Pleasure Island. Chief Wilson said we finalized a meeting with them on December 24, 2001. We met with them it came down to this is what you are going to do. If you don't comply I am not going to sign the papers and no body moves in. You can take us to court for however long it takes. David Loving asked what did they come up with? Chief Wilson Full cooperation, $15,000 towards the boat, $4,800 towards the golf cart to put on the island to carry fire equipment, and $1200 to drive the pilings for the new boat dock. David Loving asked where the new dock was going to be? Chief Wilson said where ever Sammy comes up with the property. They've got one piece of property but they want to switch with some one so that it puts two lots together so they would have a much wider area to work with. David Loving asked what area? Chief Wilson said he didn't know yet. Page 5 16J 2 vw� David Loving said basically they will have equipment on the island if something were to happen. Chief Wilson said (referring to a diagram) at first is was going to be a boat over with a fire pump to what ever low pressure hydrant to work the fire. What they come up with why don't you run a 10" line that is coming under water why don't they the development pay for the hydrant here connect all these hydrants with back valves. Basically we can pull a truck up here attached to this hydrant pressurize this line and turn every one of these hydrants as if it were at the end of our hose. So therefore all they had to do is produce a golf car that would carry three 300' sections of hose for dual fire lines, one attack line and two exposure lines, some nozzles. When they come over in the boat they would bring over the monitors that can create a fire stream. David Loving said wouldn't it make sense to put the dock in the vicinity of the hydrants? Chief Wilson said no, (still referring to the diagram) because the truck will go here, they will need one guy to run the pump panel. The other guys are going to get in the boat and come across. We are no going to put our nozzles on the island; they area $1,000 a piece. So we are putting a car carrier pack in the back of the Bronco or the Suburban. All they have to do is pull it to the boat yank this out and go across. There will be a 24- hour maintenance man, if the fire call goes out his direction is to meet them in the cart at the dock ready to go. The ISO rating is a six. David Loving what is the response time? Chief Wilson said we have to have water on that fire in 5 minutes to meet our rating. David Loving asked if they could do it. Chief Wilson said yes. It is five minutes from the moment we dock. David Loving said so it is not five minutes from the time they leave here. Chief Wilson said any one who lives in a five -mile radius enjoys that rating. The fireboat will pump right out of the water at 325GPM depending on how big of a pump he can get. With a monitor on it we can get a 200 -foot stream off of it. We have a multiple attack plan that is feasible and workable the best that can be given them. Considering the fact that there are no vehicles over there. We were going to give them our small attack truck. Then they came back with no, it is strictly golf carts, okay then we have to change everything. Page 6 16J 2 David Loving said so what did you come up with, they are going to come up with the dollar bills and you are going to buy this boat? Chief Wilson said I signed their papers Thursday the 26th David Loving said then they can start moving people in. Chief Wilson said no they cannot move any people in. The agreement stipulates that they can sell or close the property but there cannot be occupancy until the fire hydrants pass inspection. Once they tell us those hydrants are in service that they are working we will go over and test them. If they are doing what they are supposed to do at low pressure and high - pressure test. If everything goes they way it is supposed to they will sign off. David Loving said then people can start moving in, but when will you get the boat. Chief Wilson said they are to give them a check 30 days from the day of the agreement. We are actively shopping for a boat right now. David Loving said so you are going to need the dock here pretty soon. Chief Wilson said the agreement also states we have full use of their pontoon boat and docking space. David Loving said so you can respond to a fire if somebody gets over there. Chief Wilson said we cover all the bases on the contract. The meeting adjourned at 7:50PM r , L David Loving, ai an Ochopee Fire Co rol Dis ct Advisory Board Page 7 Fiala Carter • _ - M } 1 Bayshore / Gateway Triangle Henning °'� `' � • Local Redevelopment Advisory Board Coyle Minutes — Meeting of November 8, 2001 0010ft The meeting of the Bayshore / Gateway Triangle Local Redevelopment Advisory Board was called to order at 6:04 p.m. at the Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Building, conference room E. Roll Call: Present: Bill Neal, Ronald Fowle, Sharon King, Alicia Poole, Mark Benfield, and Deborah Russell, members. Marlene Foord, Principal Planner, Collier County Planning Services Department, Aaron Blair, Senior Planner, Collier County Planning Services Department, Tom Tomerlin, Senior Planner, Collier County Planning Services Department, Susan See, Administrative Secretary, Community Development Operations Department. Public, 8; Shelley Benfield, Michael Corraoi, Donald Craig, Chuck Gunther, Mark Hendry, Dan Pioli, Chris Thornton, Richard Treiser. Not present: Mike Hoy, member. 2. Adoption of Agenda Marlene Foord submitted an addition to the agenda. It was noted a request was made to change the name of the "Gateway Triangle" to the "Freedom Triangle ". 3. Adoption of Minutes of October 11, 2001 Sharon King moved to accept the minutes as submitted; seconded by Mark Benfield and carried unanimously. 4. Communications: ia. Flooding in Moorhead Manor, letter from Pamela Mac'Kie. A brief video was shown depicting the flooding in that area from the rainstorm of September 29, 2001. It was noted that Pamela Mac'Kie inquired whether not the CRA has funding to assist the residents with the flooding problem. Bill Neal inquired as to why Stormwater Management has not been more involved in an attempt to resolve this situation. Marlene Foord advised Mr. Neal that the department has actually begun to take steps to rectify the flooding. These are including, but not limited to taking measurements of the level of ground in that area. The Stormwater Management Department is also anticipating the inception of a maintenance project that will help with the drainage situation. A partially blocked pipe and an outfall will be cleared out. A larger project is expected in the future. Sharon King and Bill Neal mentioned that the whole Bayshore area was under water during the severe storm. Bill Neal said that the county staff will need to study the area and see what kind of program can be developed to ease the flooding in the area because this committee does not have the funds to assist as needed. Marlene Foord interjected that the county is able to do things such as maintenance, but large capital improvements will take more than just a simple request. There was some open discussion about what type of flooding was experienced in different sections of the Bayshore / Gateway Triangle area. Deborah Russell offered a suggestion to identify these different areas and request the Stormwater Management Department to recommend a quick, inexpensive solution that may or may not be temporary. The committee concurred with this idea. Another option was presented in which MSTU may be created to pay for property to form a lake or to pay for a pumping station to divert the flow of water into Lake Kelly. It was also noted that a meeting was to be held on November 9, 2001 to discuss the possible mixed use of the Botanical Gardens area as a park and some use for Stormwater Management. It was requested that a member from nt a Stormwater Management Department attend the next meeting to further dis�&6W9' iCi%is* plans a resolution to this solution. Also, Sharon King advised that a letter needed to be drafteo and sent to Donna Fiala stating that this committee needs assistance aV € .. �P�4— 16J 2 • Board is not in a financial position to assist the gentleman who sent in the video of the flooding in the Moorhead Manor area. Bill Neal was in agreement with his suggestion and instructed Marlene Foord to do such. b. Email from Leslie King concerning property at 2496 Kirkwood Avenue It was noted that Mr. King was not present at this meeting. Maps outlining this property were distributed. Mr. King is interested in what type of incentives is available in cases where owners improve property. He was advised that no such incentives are in place yet, but the county is working on trying to implement incentives. These may include fagade grants, code compliance grants, etc. Ronald Fowle voiced a concern that the original plan had an objective to put a road through Pine Street and through his property. Mark Benfield inquired as to whether or not this road was actually written in the CRA plan. He was advised that it was simply an option to improve interconnectivity in that area. Bill Neal offered a suggestion that the advisory board acknowledge both of the above concerns with a response, however these individuals are also to be advised that the board is still in the beginning stages, and is not able to distribute funds to assist property owners at this time. Marlene Food informed Bill Neal of county staff's reasoning for presenting these concerns to the board. This reason is so the committee members have a better understanding of what the community needs when future grants are discussed. 5. Old Business a. Update on Projects in the Bayshore and Gateway areas Mark Hendry advised that he had seen the draft amendments for his sign for his restaurant. • He informed the board that it was sufficient to allow for visibility. Marlene Foord presented Bill Neal with a letter written by Mark Hendry. There was some discussion about how the draft was written. The conclusion was made that the draft is worded in such a way that it offers a feasible resolution. Marlene Foord informed the advisory board that even though this amendment is initiated by county staff, processed by county staff and recommended by the Bayshore / Gateway Triangle Local Redevelopment Advisory Board, it must still be approved by the CRA before processing. This issue is on the consent agenda for the CRA meeting November 13, 2001. Bill Neal commended the staff for their efforts put forth while drafting these amendments. Marlene Foord also gave an update on the Halderman Creek dredging. The Collier County Board of Commissioners will be considering approval of the contract on November 13, 2001. This engineering study issue is also on the consent agenda. b. Review of Draft Land Development Code Amendments for Bayshore Drive Mixed Use Zoning Overlay (Aaron Blair) i. Pole Signs on Bayshore Drive Draft amendment language including recommended language from the advisory board was included in the agenda packages. Nothing further was discussed with the exception of the draft amendments for the Halderman Creek restaurant as mentioned above. ii. Bed and Breakfast Lodging Facilities Draft amendment language including recommended language from the advisory . board was included in the agenda packages. Nothing further was discussed with the 16J 2 • exception of the draft amendments for the Halderman Creek restaurant as mentioned above. c. Incentives Subcommittee Report and Recommendations There was much open discussion pertaining the subcommittee receiving no direction from the CRA. There were several comments made back and forth amongst the Bayshore / Gateway Triangle Local Redevelopment Advisory Board members as to what steps needed to be taken to further the value of the subcommittee. It was ultimately decided to set up an incentives subcommittee meeting and to invite Donna Fiala to attend. 6. New Business a. Review of 2001 Florida Redevelopment Association Conference — Observations and Recommendations Marlene Foord advised that there were many CRA members present at this conference. Marlene Foord stated that it was hoped that committee members and more county staff might be able to attend if so desired. Marlene advised that it was an excellent opportunity for staff to see what it is like for the elected and appointed officials and vice versa. It was also an excellent opportunity to see what types of incentives have worked in other CRA's. Bill Neal inquired as to where funds come from for the individuals to attend the conference. Marlene advised that in her instance, the county travel budget allowed her to attend. However, it was also noted that some CRA's paid for themselves, and some also had things such as grants that allowed them to attend. It was noted that this conference was very educational. Marlene also presented a list of incentives she learned about that may work for this committee as well. Fast track permitting, fagade grants and code compliance grants, and • impact fee assistance were among the suggestions in this area. It was noted that the majority of the impact fee assistance that was given were for homes. Another important item that was noted at the conference was that many CRA has obtained a loan or bond, and was able to pay it back over the years. Marlene Foord advised that she had spoken with Jim Mudd about the lack of funds surrounding this advisory board. It was suggested that she coordinate with the budget director and the finance director to discuss this option further. It was also noted that some CRA have tools they use for marketing, including things they have to offer, such as natural resources. b. Review of draft CRA Marketing Materials Tom Tomerlin distributed pamphlets, which showed a rough draft that would give the public an idea of what types of incentives would be offered through this committee. It shall also list large landmarks in the area, as well as what capital improvement are being and will be made. It was noted that this material was also presented to the EDC, and they will have some input as to what should also be included. Tom Tomerlin advised that the incentives area of the brochure would be expanded. The committee will look over this material and make comments before the next meeting in order to present a new draft. c. Other Aaron Blair presented to the committee an idea to have a yearly event in the East Naples area that may promote the businesses in the area and promote the area in general. It was agreed that the CRA may be much more effective in coordinating an event such as that. Marlene suggested that an event subcommittee be formed. Bill Neal suggested that an event be coordinated with the Botanical Gardens. The committee members agreed to think of some more ideas to discuss at the next meeting. • 16J 2 9- • Chuck Gunther presented an idea on behalf of his neighborhood to change the name of the "Bayshore / Gateway Triangle" to the "Freedom Triangle." He advised that he has begun a petition to this effect. He pointed out that there exists "Freedom Square" shopping center, the "Freedom Horses ", and the proposed new name would fit better than a name including the word "Gateway." The public also desires this name because of the events surrounding the September 11, 2001 attacks against the United States. He suggested that it fits with everything in current affairs. It was noted that the public may refer to the area with whatever name they choose, but they cannot change the name of the advisory board without a proposal passed by the CRA. Marlene Foord also noted that it would involve changing numerous documents. Bill Neal suggested to Chuck Gunther that he organize and complete his petition and this committee will go "on record" and support his efforts. In the meantime, the area may be referred to in conversation as the Freedom triangle. 7. Citizen Comments Dan Pioli reminded the committee that his proposal for the mini- triangle contained language that recommended the installation of underground stormwater vaults that would help relieve some of the surface flooding. It was also noted the "Voo -Doo lounge" property is for sale at a price of $1,395,000. Richard Treiser submitted that he shares the committee's frustrations regarding the lack of direction from the CRA in the aspect of incentives. He also offered his support for this committee. 8. Adjourment • Adjournment- As there was no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 8:20 p.m. The next meeting will be held on December 13, 2001, at 6:00 p.m. at eh Community Development and Environmental Services Building, conference room E. • 16J 2 ,pry Carter Henning Coyle Colette I1 /-u• .�� .0 To: The office of Minutes and Records From: Susan See, Administrative Secretary Bayshore /Gateway Local Redevelopment Advisory Board Date: January 16, 2002 Subject: minutes and tape The following are enclosed from the Bayshore /Gateway Local Redevelopment Advisory Board meeting of November 8, 2001: Copy of minutes as written by Susan See, Administrative Secretary Tapes One and Two dictating the above meeting. M 161P J ,r Bayshore /Gateway Triangle ��► Local Redevelopment Advisory Board, r� MCP '<, <'`�� INCENTIVES SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING �CIO` ��'� Minutes — Meeting of August 21, 2001 G° The meeting of the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Local Redevelopment Advisory Board INCENTIVES SUBMCOMMITTEE was called to order at 5:10 p.m. at the Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Building, Conference Room E. Members in attendance: Staff in attendance: Bill L. Neal Aaron Blair, Planning Services Ron Fowle Marlene Foord, Planning Services Deborah L. Russell Sharon D. King 1. Roll Call. All subcommittee members were present. Deborah Russell made a motion to nominate Ronald Fowle as subcommittee chairman, seconded by Sharon King and carried unanimously. 2. Incentives Discussion and Work Plan Aaron Blair distributed an outline of a proposed work program. Ms. Foord indicated that creation of a work program is one of the responsibilities of the advisory board and this should include proposed expenses related to the incentives programs being discussed and could be included in the annual report provided to the CRA. The proposed work program allocates funds to certain programs, such as the fagade grant program, the code compliance grant program the low- interest loan program, infrastructure and land acquisition and administrative costs. Discussion ensued concerning how much should be allocated to each program. Ms. Foord indicated that administrative costs are being paid by the Planning Services budget through the general fund at least through the next fiscal year so this frees up some of the funds to be re- allocated to other programs. She also indicated that eventually the CRA would be expected to take over these expenses, as more funding is available as a result of the increase in the tax increment over the years. Mr. Neal indicated that in earlier discussions the importance of getting the fagade grant program was stressed and Ms. King indicated that fast track permitting is also mentioned as an important part of that. Mr. Fowle mentioned that there are concerns over whether the improvement of fagades will bring the full compliance of the building department upon that business and this could deter participation. Ms. Foord noted the concern and mentioned that the code compliance grants may be able to help with this and will invite the appropriate departments to provide assistance. She mentioned that all the inspection disciplines could be brought onto the site at the same time for a full inspection and then the funds could help with all the code problems. She also mentioned that some communities provide a grace period for citations during the process. One possibility would be to approve the code compliance grant prior to having the inspection, so the applicant would have the approval in hand prior to inviting the inspection team to find all the code problems. It was mentioned that when the loan program was previously discussed, it was noted that those funds might be more appropriate for housing and that maybe the funds from the low- interest loans should be shifted to the code compliance program because it can provide help immediately and needs more of the allocation. The use of the infrastructure and acquisitions funds was discussed and enhancing traffiM30nGWWcket parks, landscaping, drainage and street lighting opportunities were mentioned as examples. It was entioned that other programs are also available for some of these improvements, including MSTUs. Date: Item# / W I August 16, 2001 Immokalee Local Redevelopment Advisory Board Page 1 of 2 Copies To: 16J 2 Options for selection of projects or project areas was discussed as well as the need for clear selection criteria and uniform notification to everyone about the availability of the grants. The existing efforts of the county to improve the drainage in the area were acknowledged. Offering one grant for each area of the redevelopment area was discussed, as was the amount of available funding. Programs would most likely not be fully established with funds ready to distribute until after the beginning of 2002 so the increment for 2000/20 would also be available to use. Ms. Foord distributed and reviewed staff drafts of possible fagade and code compliance grant programs based on similar programs used by other CRAB in Florida. The possibility of providing these programs as loans rather than grants was also discussed to extend the funds. It was mentioned that there are currently no banks in the CRA area itself, but there are several in the proximity that might participate. Ms. Foord mentioned that the subcommittee might want to invite someone from the Housing and Urban Improvement program, which already administers loans or the Collier banking agency to a meeting to provide some insight. Mr. Fowle suggested contacting the City of Naples CRA for their input as well. The need to create zoning overlays to make the programs easier was discussed. Ms. Foord mentioned that the subcommittee should consider whether the grants should be available for commercial and residential or just commercial. Mr. Blair mentioned that he could be available to assist applicants with architectural sketches. There are examples and ideas in the redevelopment plan that could be offered as choices as well. The possibility of front porch grants for residential properties was suggested. A discussion ensued about how to involve and inform the public and it was decided to recommend to the advisory board that the advisory board ask the CRA to hold a joint meeting /workshop, open to the public and separate from the regular BCC meeting, to get specific direction from the CRA on the incentives and to discuss the uses of the tax increment funds prior to creating the actual incentive programs. This will be placed on the September 13`h advisory board agenda for consideration. It was suggested that the media be informed about the programs, as they are developed to assist with public information. The possibility of a brochure was mentioned. The importance of streetlights was mentioned and it was decided to invite someone from the county staff to explain the street lighting program/district. Ms. Foord mentioned inviting staff familiar with the fast track permitting to a meeting to explain how that might work for the CRA areas as well. Ms. Foord informed the members that almost half of the mini - triangle property owners returned completed questionnaires and she expects a few more in the next several days. Those questionnaire responses will serve as the starting point for a series of meetings over the next few months with the property owners to see what changes, if any, need to be made to the land development code to allow them to redevelop. A brief discussion ensued about the possibility that the CRA or even one or two of the property owners themselves may still consider purchase of land within the mini - triangle to redevelop the area, but that redevelopment may happen naturally as improvements around it spur improvements within the mini - triangle. The meeting concluded with a commitment from the subcommittee members to review the drafts of the fagade and code compliance grants, consider how to address residential and a plan to update the full advisory board at the September 13'h meeting. Future subcommittee meetings will be held after the next advisory board meeting, date to be determined. 3. Citizen Comments There were no citizens present. 4. Adjournment. As there was no further business to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 6:35 p.m. The next meeting date to be determined. Adopted by unanimous vote November 20, 2001 August 21, 2001 Bayshore /Gateway Incentives Subcommittee Page 2 of 2 o ..rites Memorandum ♦ r 4: To: The Office of Minutes and Records From: Susan M. See, Administrative Secretary, Community Development Operations Date: 16J 2 Subject: Bayshore 1 Gateway Local Redevelopment Advisory Board I have enclosed the tape(s) and minutes from the meeting of the incentives subcommittee meeting of August 21, 2001. Please do not hesitate to call me at 659 -5735 if you have any questions. Thank you. Office of the County Manager 01/29/2002 15:47 7748301 PUB INFO ✓- PAi 0 2 Collier County Go vie nm en t Department of Public Information 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 (941) 774 -8999 Jan. 29, 2002 Contact: Fiala Carter Henning Coyle _ Coletta FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Lavah Hetzel Public Information 774 -8373 BAYSHOREIGATEWA.Y 'TRIANGLE LOCAL REDEVELOPMENT ADVISORY BOARD REGULAR MEETING Thursday, Feb. 7, 2002, 6 p.m. Community Development & Environmental Services 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Conference Room E 1. Roll Call 2. Adoption of Agenda 3. Adoption of Minutcs from Dec. 13, 2001 and Tan. 3, 2002 4. Communications 5. Old Business a. Update on Projects in the Bayshore and Gatcway areas i.. Stormwatcr management and drainage ii. Update on CDBG Grant application for Linwood Avenue project iii. Update on potential of bonding iv. Update on purchase of Botanical Gardens property b. Incentives Subcommittee Update c. Festival Subcommittee Update d. Mini- Triangle Options and Recommendation to CRA —to be discussed following 7 p_m —mini- Triangle Property Owner ;r Workshop 6. New Business a. Handouts b. Other 7. Citizen. Comments -More - Corres: _. , alb: 01129/2002 15:47 7748301 PUS INFO PAGE 02102 -2- 16J 2 Starting at 7 p.m. Mini - Triangle Property Owner's Workshop See attached invitation 8. Adi ournment FESTI'VA,L SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING Thursday, Feb. 7, 2002,5:30 p.m. — 6:00 p.m. Community Development & Environmental Services 2800 North Horseshoe Dr. Conference Room E 9. Roll. Call — Members Appointed at January 3rd ,Advisory Board meeting — Bill Neal and Deborah Russell, other are welcome as well 10. Tdeas and Concepts for Festival 11- Ci ti zen Comments 12. Next Meeting 13. Adjournment Note: Regular Meeting of the Bayshore /Gateway Triangle Local Redevelopment Advisory Board Immediately Follows -6:00 p.m. Note: All meetings will be publicly noticed in the W_ Harmon Turner Building (Administration Building F), on the CPA websi.te, at any other appropriate locations as recommended by the advisory board and provided to the County Public Information Department for further distribution. Please call Marlene Foord, Principal Planner, at 213 -2903 if you have any questions about the meeting agenda or need directions to the meeting location. In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, persons needing assistance to participate in any of these proceedings should contact Marlene Foord at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. -30- Mole Carter Henning Coyle Coietta MEMORANDUM TO: Sue Filson, Executive manager FROM: Bleu Wallace, Director 16J 2 SUBJECT: Transmittal of Minutes - Collier County Water & Wastewater Authority DATE: January 18, 2002 Transmitted herewith are the approved minutes of the Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority for October 23, 2000. These minutes were approved November 27, 2000. Direct any questions to me at 403 -2302. disc. C,orres: Date: Ite'a 11oJ 1 Copes To: Operations Department Community Development and Environmental Services Division 16J 2 COLLIER COUNTY WATER AND WASTEWATER AUTHORITY Minutes of Meeting Board Room, 3rd Floor, Turner Building 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112 2:00 P.M., Monday, October 23, 2000 An audio record of the following proceedings is on file with the Utility & Franchise Regulation Department, Collier Business Plaza, Suite 210, 3050 N. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, FL 34104, Phone (941) 403 -2302. Assistant County Attorney Thomas C. Palmer was present to provide legal advice to the Authority and Director D. E. "Bleu" Wallace was present to represent the Utility & Franchise Regulation Department staff. I. Call to Order (Determination of Quorum) The meeting was called to order by Chairman Lowell M. Lam. All members were present as follows: Vice Chairman Andre M. LeCrone, Dr. Fay R. Biles, Robert C. Bennett, and Gregory Smith. II. Approval of Minutes of August 28, 2000 Mr. Bennett made a motion to approve the minutes of the August 28, 2000 meeting with a second by Mr. Smith. Motion passes unanimously (5 -0). Regarding last months meeting, Dr. Biles asked for the status of the Isles of Capri resident's questions raised in conjunction with the proposed sewer system. Mr. Wallace advised the Authority that staff has contacted Florida Water Services, and they are in the process of providing staff with costs, plans, etc. regarding the proposed sewer system on Isles of Capri. After this is received, staff will contact the Isles of Capri resident for dissemination of the information. III. Open to the Public There were no requests from the public to address the Authority. IV. Item Requiring Action by Authority: Authority Discussion — Orangetree Utilities Mr. Wallace advised that he has been keeping the Authority up to date regarding the utility by faxing Authority members all correspondence received from Orangetree. Orangetree has been providing staff with bi- weekly updates regarding the status of the permit, etc. Mr. Wallace's stated his concern with Orangetree's response to Final Order No. 00 -06 issued by the Authority. Orangetree filed a Petition for Review of Final Order on September 15th 16J Z Assistant County Attorney Tom Palmer submitted his response to their petition on September 27"'. To date, no response to Mr. Palmer's correspondence has been received from Orangetree. Mr. Wallace advised that Orangetree has not been forthcoming in providing staff with the full accounting of fees as stated in the final order. Mr. Wallace suggested the Authority consider hiring a consulting firm to conduct an objective review of the utility from both an operations and accounting standpoint. Funds are budgeted for consulting services. Staff can complete a scope of services to include specific items for review, such as: customer deposit refunds, contributions in aid of construction, source and use of impact fees /funds, failure of reporting as directed by this Authority, billing procedures, review of developer agreements, DEP compliance status, water quality, capacity to serve both planned and actual, impact fee analysis, etc. An engineering firm with rate making ability and knowledge, is already under contract with the County, and can be retained fairly quickly. Waterways Joint Venture legal representative Rich Yovanovich, addressed the Authority at this time. In response to a question posed by Chairman Lam, Mr. Yovanovich advised the Authority that the new homes that were in question previously, are currently being provided service by Orangetree Utilities. Mr. Yovanovich went on to state that the operation of Orangetree Utility is critical to the success or failure of the Waterways development. A check was sent to Orangetree Utilities by Waterways Joint Venture for final payment of all capacity charges incurred by the developer. On November 16`", the developer agreement along with the check, was returned to Waterways stating that Orangetree was unable to execute the developers agreement due to the inability to provide capacity. Mr. Yovanovich expressed his concern that Orangetree is not following direction imposed by the Authority. Mr. Bennett requested a representative from Orangetree Utilities, however no one was present. Mr. Wallace advised that the utility was provided, via fax, the agenda for today's meeting. Mr. LeCrone asked Assistant County Attorney Tom Palmer whether Orangetree Utility can continue to protest the Authority actions. Mr. Palmer advised that the utility has a legal obligation to allow auditors and/or engineers employed by the County to give them free access to their facilities for on -site inspections and free access to their accounting records. If the utility does not cooperate, Mr. Palmer advised that the Authority can issue a show cause order and if necessary, fine the utility. The highest action that can be taken against a utility is a revocation of their certificate by the Board of County Commission. Dr. Biles had several questions regarding the statements made by DEP to Orangetree Utility. Since no representative was present from DEP to answer these questions, Mr. Wallace advised he would contact DEP for further clarification. 16J 2 Mr. Lam advised Mr. Yovanovich that his points were well taken by the Authority. The Authority is upset by the way utility is responding to these issues and should take action today to allow staff to begin retaining an engineering firm to commence with an audit of Orangetree Utility. A motion was made by Mr. LeCrone, with a second by Dr. Biles, to proceed with staff's recommendation to hire an outside engineering and ratemaking entity to look into the operational and accounting operations of Orangetree Utility. Included in this motion was the statement that if any irregularities were uncovered during the audit, an emergency meeting of the Authority be called immediately to address and resolve the issues. Motion passed unanimously (5 -0). Mr. Wallace will forward a letter to Orangetree Utility advising them of the action and motion taken by the Authority during this meeting. Mr. David Schmidt, representing Bonita Bay Group, addressed the authority. Mr. Schmidt wanted the Authority to be aware that the Twin Eagles development was also involved with Orangetree Utility. V. Authority Members Discussion None VI. Adjournment Meeting was adjourned. Fiala / Carter Henning _ Coyle Coletta Roadway an Drainage M.S.T.U. ' Advisory Committee 2705 Horseshoe Drive South IVa Naples FL 34104 MINUTES OF JANUARY 11, 2002 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND MOTIONS: III. It was moved and seconded to accept the minutes of December 21, 2002. IV. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: B. COST ESTIMATE OF PREPARING ROADS FOR COUNTY TAKEOVER: Ed Kant presented estimates as follows: 1. DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ON FOREST LAKES DRIVE: Replacement of Pipes and 14 drop Inlets - $79,900 2. PAVEMENT EVALUATION ON FOREST LAKES BLVD: Evaluation of existing pavement by geotechnical consultant - $5,000 3. ROAD SURVEY ON FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD: Needed to plan future improvements - $10,000 V. OLD BUSINESS: B. REPLACEMENT OF PIPES(PHASE 2): Engineers from Collier County DOT will meet with MSTU member to see which replacements are really necessary. C. INCREASE IN MILLAGE RATE: Committee is going to poll the community to see if there is support for a two -mill cap increase to assist in hurrying the work along. D. MPO PATHWAY REPORT: Numerous persons will attend MPO meeting on February 1, 2002 to show their objection to the pathway. Misc. Corres: Date: Item# ) tP,S Copies To: 16J 2 Roadway and Drainage M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL 34104 January 11, 2002 I. Bob Jones called the meeting to order at 10:01 AM. He addressed the public who were in attendance and asked that they hold any questions or comments until that portion of the meeting called Public Comments when they would be allowed to approach the podium and be recognized for 3 to 5 minutes. II. ATTENDANCE.: A. Members: Robert H. Jones, Bob Cunningham, Roger Somerville and Tom Watts present. Bill Seabury absent. B. Collier County: Ed Kant, DOT Operations Director and Bob Petersen, DOT Operations. C. Other: Thirteen residents of the Quail Run Communities and Allen Jost, Manpower Secretarial Services. III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Roger Somerville moved and Bob Cunningham seconded that the minutes of December 21, 2001 be approved as presented. Motion carried unanimously. IV. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: A. BUDGET: Bob Petersen handed out the Fund 155 Report, which is attached herewith and made a part of the minutes. He pointed out that there was very little change since the last meeting was only three weeks before, however there was an increase in the cost of the preparation of the minutes. The committee should think about the fact that the $3500 budgeted for this service would not be sufficient if this cost continued at the higher amount, which could bring it to $7000 for the year. B. COST ESTIMATE OF PREPARING ROADS FOR TAKEOVER: Ed Kant handed out an Email that was prepared by his staff summarizing estimates of cost for preparing the roads for takeover by Collier County. That document is made a part of the minutes and attached herewith. He reviewed the costs with the board and then went on to say that he felt that the MSTU could not afford to bring the roads up to the standard necessary for the county to take over. He suggested instead that the roads be brought up to an acceptable level and then contract with the county to take over the maintenance that would be paid for by the MSTU at an acceptable cost. Roger Somerville asked if the county would be willing to accept the maintenance of Forest Lakes Boulevard which has recently been repaved, as Phase I, if the conditions outlined in the Email were met and the road were to be brought up to those acceptable standards. Ed Kant replied that this decision was up to the Board of Commissioners, however since it is a 16J 2 road that would only serve the residents in this community, the question will be asked if bringing this under the Fund 111 would be in the best interests of the general public of the county. Bob Cunningham asked Ed Kant why the question of the county taking the roads over because the road doesn't go through is coming up now when ten years ago we were promised that if the roads were brought up to standard they would take them over. Ed Kant stated that he was not saying the county would not take the roads over but only pointing out that in his professional opinion the MSTU should have a Plan B if they were not taken over. They should have a plan for maintaining the road and not letting them deteriorate. He further pointed out that he is not the decision - making authority and must confer with his superiors as to whether DOT could support recommending to the Board of Commissioners the takeover of the road. Bob Cunningham said that it seems like the longer the project drags on, the higher the standards become to have the roads taken over. Bob Petersen said that Ed Kant would look into whether or not staff can support the request to the BCC for the takeover of the road and will have an answer for the committee by next meeting. V. OLD BUSINESS: A. TRAFFIC CALMING: This item will be carried forward to next month. B. REPLACEMENT OF PIPES (PHASE 2): The cost estimate of this is included in the Email referred to above and attached herewith. The estimate was for $79,900. Bob Cunningham said that rather than proceed with the whole project at once; the most immediate problems should be addressed. Ed Kant offered to have Jerry Kurtz and Julio Ordonez meet with him to explain how they came up with the price and to determine if doing only a part of it will give the desired relief. Bob Jones said that he had participated in a study, last year that determined that there were only 6 old pipes that had to be replaced and two other pipes that could not be located that should be newly put in. It was agreed that there would be separate meetings scheduled with Bob Cunningham and also with Bob Jones to review what replacements should be included and at what time schedule. C. INCREASE OF MILLAGE RATE: Bob Jones said that the committee had voted for a millage increase with the idea that monies could be advanced to proceed with the work. Ed Kant said that there is a two -year cap on paying off advances. With a one mill increase that means that the maximum you could be advanced would be $200,000. He also pointed out that the Fund 341, which is used for advances, might not have sufficient in it to be able to make an advance and that answer would have to come from the Budget Office. It was suggested that instead of asking for only one mill increase that a two -mill increase be asked for. Bob Jones said that the committee would try to poll the community and see if there would be general support for such an increase. Bob Petersen said that even if a three -mill cap were approved, it would not mean that the committee had to 2 16,1 2 spend that amount of money. He said the Executive Summary would be prepared and if the committee decides to increase it, he will be able to add the appropriate number in it after the next meeting. D. MPO PATHWAY REPORT: Bob Jones passed out a letter that was prepared and sent out to the MPO by the Quail Run Golf Club. It is made a part of the minutes and attached herewith. He invited anyone interested to attend this meeting on February 1, 2002. E. QUAIL RUN GOLF COURSE ENTRANCE: There is no additional information available yet but will be carried forward to the next meeting. VI. NEW BUSINESS: Roger Somerville said that he felt that a pump station was necessary to move the water to the canal that flows from the weir at the lake near hole 16 at Quail Run Golf Course. He requested that the drawing from Butler Engineering be made available. VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS: A. Ernie Carol of Emerald Greens said that the potholes need attention. Bob Petersen said he has requested the road crew to come and take care of those. Ernie Carol also said that Sprint had left some holes unsodded after digging pipes in. Bob Petersen said he would have the permitting people to check with them to have this done. B. Joe Donovan expressed concern that he could not report to his constituents that they would not be having water lapping at their garage doors again. Bob Petersen said that this project that replaced the pipes would be done before the rainy season and should alleviate those problems. C. Jim Ahling, Manager of Forest Lakes Condominium Association, asked that he be included in the meeting with the County Engineers since he had considerable background in the movement of water in this area. VIII. ADJOURNMENT: Bob Cunningham moved for adjournment. Roger Somerville seconded. Meeting was adjourned at 11:48 PM. Next Meeting is scheduled for 10:00 AM, Friday, February 1, 2002 At the Forest Lakes Clubhouse 3 16J 2 Petersen b =rom: ordonez_j - Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 11:57 AM To: Petersen —b Cc: kant e; kurtz_g Subject: Forest Lakes Bob: Jerry Kurtz and I spend some time yesterday at Forest Lakes development. The following is a summary of what I think we could do this FY: 1) DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS ON FOREST LAKES DRIVE. It seems like the existing inlets and pipes on the road, including the outfall pipes into the existing swales behind the homes on the west side of the road, need to be replaced. The existing metal pipes look either collapsed or in bad shape. The existing inlets are too shallow and made out of brick and too small, they should be replaced. I "gross" estimated these in an amount of approximately $80.000 as shown in the attached file. lJ Forest Lakes Drive improvement... 2) PAVEMENT EVALUATION ON FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD. We need to have the existing pavement evaluated by a geotechnical consultant. I figure we could setup a work order for up to $5,0000 for that purpose. We are in the process of contacting the City of Naples Utility Department to see if we can have the existing gravity sewer main evaluated by .hem. I strongly believe that the failing of the existing pavement structure is caused, to a great extent, by the failure on the existing sewer pipes and manholes. 3) ROAD SURVEY ON FOREST LAKES BOULEVARD, We also need to have some survey taken on the existing road in order to better plan future improvements. I feel like we could spend up to $10,000 doing that. 4) EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM MAINTENANCE. Jerry and I inspected the outfall pipe on the west side of the development and it seems to be in need of some cleaning. There are a few rocks and other debris blocking the pipes up. We need to bring the issue to the Forest Lakes AB for action, to ensure that the lake maintenance is setup as an ONGOING issue. Please let me know if you have any questions or would like to further discuss any of the issues mentioned above THANKSI Julio F. OrdoMez, P.E. Senior Project Manager Collier County Transportation Operations Department 16,1 2 Forest Lakes Drive Drainage Improvements Cost Estimate Item Descri tion Unit Ouantitv Unit Cost Cost A.1 Mobilization LS 1 $5,000 $5,000 A.2 MOT LS 1 $5,000 $5,000 A.3 Erosion Control LS 1 $2,000 $2,000 AA 18" RCP LF 1000 $30 $30,000 A.5 Mittered End Sectons EA 5 $1,500 $7,500 A.6 Inlet Boxes EA 14 $2,000 $28,000 A.7 Sodding SY 1200 $2 1$2,400 Total 1$79,900 J. F.O. Forest Lakes Drive improvements 1/11/2002 QUAIL RUN GOLF CLUB January 2, 2002 Mr. Christopher Hagan, Chairman Pathway Advisory Committee Collier County WO 2685 South Horseshoe Drive, 0211 Naples, FL 34104 Re: Pine Ridge Road 16J 2 1 Forest Lakes Boulevard _ Naples, FL 34105 Pro -Shop (941) 261 -3930 Office (941) 261 -2198 Dining Room (941) 261 -3308 FAX (941) 261 -2774 Dear Mr. Hagan: We have received your letter of November 16, 2001, regarding a possible sidewalk on the south side of Pine Ridge Road from Forest Lakes Boulevard to Woodshire Lane. While we agree that cyclists and pedestrians need a safe path for travel, we believe the sidewalk on the north side of Pine Ridge Road gives them that opportunity. Traffic lights with "walk' signals allow persons to cross Pine Ridge safely, both near the Publix Store and the Quail Run entrance. Commercial entrances require care on the part of motorists and cyclists, but caution always should be foremost when traveling on busy streets. The MSTU considered this issue at its last meeting and is not in favor of a sidewalk on the south side of Pine Ridge Road. Not only do the pine trees and hedge screen the golf course and the nearby condos from the noise and pollution of Pine Ridge, they also afford protection to the motorists from stray golf balls. The Quail Run Board of Directors also is not in favor of a Right of Way on our property. We plan to attend your meeting on February 1, 2002, at 7:30 a.m. and look forward to meeting you at that time. Yours truly, Lou Rozzi, General Manager cc: Bob Jones, MSTU 'J° 16J 2 Fiala Carter Henning Coyle -- Colette MEMORANDUM TO: Kathleen Martinson, Administrative Aide to BC FROM: Sam Tucker, Executive Aide to BCC DATE: January 18, 2002 RE: Community Character /Smart Growth Advisory Committee Agenda and Minutes I am submitting the following Agenda and Minutes of the Community Character /Smart Growth Advisory Committee to be filed by your office. 1. Agenda for December 5, 2001. 2. Minutes of December 5, 2001. Thank You, Sam Tucker Executive Aide to BCC V,ise. Gorres: Date: � 10Z tLCA-IH t Cad I 16,J 2 COMMUNITY CHARACTER/SMART GROWTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE MEETING DATE: MEETING TIME: LOCATION: �. December 5, 2001 10:00 a.m. Collier County Government Supervisor of Elections Building Training Room 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 1. CALL TO ORDER 11. DISCUSSION OF COMMUNITY CHARACTER/SMART GROWTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE GROUND RULES AS OUTLINED IN ORDINANCE NO. 2001 -41 111. TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM #3 IV. PROCESS FOR PRIORITIZING IMPLEMENTATION OF COMMUNITY CHARACTER PLAN AND OTHER SMART GROWTH INITIATIVES V. DISCUSSION AND DETERMINATION OF MEETING SCHEDULE VI. OTHER VII. ADJOURNMENT 16J 2 Community Character /Smart Growth Advisory Committee Minutes of December 5, 2001 I. The meeting was called to order by Chairman Jim Rideoutte at 10:08 a.m. Members Present: Jim Rideoutte, Jim Lucas, Sally Barker, Mike Bauer, Sam Noe, Pat Pochopin, Bill West, Ellin Goetz, Bruce Anderson, Gordon Watson, Mark Morton. Absent: Kathy Prosser Staff. Commissioner Tom Henning, Amy Taylor, Sam Tucker. II. DISCUSSION OF MEETING SCHEDULE: The group decided the second and fourth Wednesday of each month, from 2 -4 p.m. would suit everyone best at this point. The meeting place will be the Supervisor of Elections Building and the group will continue to meet twice a month until further notice. Next meeting scheduled for Wednesday, December 19, 2001 at 2:00 p.m. in the Supervisor of Elections Building. III. DISCUSSION OF COMMUNITY CHARACTER/SMART GROWTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE GROUND RULES: a. As outlined in Ordinance 2001 -41 creating the Community Character /Smart Growth Advisory Committee, members present agree that any member who misses two consecutive meetings without an acceptable excuse (as deemed by Chairman), will be excused from the committee. b. Absences by committee members will be called into Sam Tucker at the BCC Office at 774 -8393 or by e-mail at samtucker@collier og v.net. c. Principal members only are allowed to vote in meetings, no alternates allowed. d. Quorum for the group is 7. e. There was a mention by the Chairman that vacations and summer homes may cause problems. Please be courteous and inform the group in advance of extended trips and vacations. IV. ELECTION OF SECRETARY: a. Chairman Jim Rideoutte nominates Pat Pochopin as Committee Secretary. b. Seconded by Sally Barker. c. Passed unanimously. d. Sam Tucker appointed to be minute -taker for committee. 16J V. REQUEST FROM CHAIRMAN FOR LETTER TO COUNTY MANAGER FOR SUPPORT NEEDED FROM COUNTY STAFF TO IMPLEMENT THE COMMUNITY CHARACTER PLAN. a. Specifically: Transportation, Parks and Recreation, Budget, Planning and Natural Resources. b. Primarily to request presentations from staff including material and information that the committee may not have otherwise. c. Secondarily, to avoid conflicts and duplications. d. First requested presentation to be from Transportation at next meeting on December 19, 2001. VI. DISCUSSION TO BRING IN MEMBERS OF THE RURAL LANDS AND RURAL FRINGE COMMITTEES TO UPDATE AND INFORM EACH OTHER OF CURRENT, UPCOMING AND PROJECTS COMPLETED. VII. PROCESS TO PRIORITIZE COMMITMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY CHARACTER/SMART GROWTH ADVISORY COMMITTEE: a. Chairman's first suggestion: to start small, realistically. Choose projects that are attainable with great impact at low cost. b. Amy Taylor suggested the US 41 project. c. Chairman suggests Naples Park due to minimal cost, the current desire of the neighborhood to be involved in improvement and the recommended outline by Dover Kohl in the Community Character Plan. d. Ellin Goetz suggests the breaking down of the book Towards Better Places into sections and assigning them to committee members geared towards their individual knowledge of laws and principles. Committee members could concentrate on specific areas and report to each other on their sections /projects /progress. VIII. REQUEST FOR THE COMMITTEE TO RECEIVE HAND OUTS FROM TRANSPORTATION DEPARTMENTS' PRESENTATION TO THE BCC. IX. MINUTES OF LAST MEETING APPROVED BY VICE - CHAIR. X. ADJOURNMENT v� 161 AJ;OVED GOLDEN GATE ESTATES LAND TRUST COMMITTEE MONDAY, DECEMBER 11, 2000 i GOLDEN GATE ESTATES BRANCH LIBRARY Charles ( "Skip ") VanGelder % rman Matthew Hudson U c hairman Stephen Greenberg a er (absent) Karen Acquard F 0( e r Jozsef Kelemen G ��`� esigned) Toni Mott �y - Supervisor, Real Property Management Department God Dave Anderson -Asst. Fire Chief, Golden Gate Estates Fire Control & & Rescue District DISTRIBUTION: Schedule of Revenue and Expenditures for FY 99/00 as of July 31, 2000 Schedule of Revenue and Expenditures for FY 00/01 as of October 31, 2000 I. CALL TO ORDER Skip VanGelder, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. 11. APPROVAL OF MINUTES -July 24, 2000 Karen made a motion to accept the minutes. Matt seconded the motion, and the minutes were approved. III. APPROVAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT Toni reported an ending cash balance of $584,072.00, and an available cash balance of $461,347.40. Matt made a motion to accept the treasurer's report. Karen seconded the motion. All in favor. IV. BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT - Maximum expenditure of $50,000 (Design) No discussion took place due to no activity. V. GOLDEN GATE FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT — Maximum expenditure of $12,500 (C.E.R.T. Equip.) Toni stated that the Agreement allocating the funds expired on November 22, 2000. Asst. Chief Anderson requested the committee to approve an extension for the expenditure of these funds. Asst. Chief Anderson advised that no equipment was purchased until it was determined there were enough individuals to participate in a C.E.R.T. Team Member training program. Asst. Chief Anderson said the class is ready to go. Skip asked the time frame fd'silt WR*letion of the training program and Asst. Chief Anderson said seven (7) weeks. a /0�— Date: Ite-My I (os 1 Gvd es To: 16J Karen made a motion to approve a six (6) month extension of the Agreement providing for a maximum expenditure of $12,500 to reimburse the Golden Gate Fire Control & Rescue District for the purchase of C.E.R.T. Program equipment. VI. COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION- Maximum Expenditure of $50,000 (Fitness Equipment) Toni was directed to contact Murdo Smith, Parks & Recreation Department, advising him of the expiration date for the expenditure of these funds. VII. GOLDEN GATE FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT — Request for Funds Asst. Chief Anderson presented a drawing for the proposed renovations to Golden Gate Fire Station #71. Discussion followed concerning the multi- purpose meeting room, additional bays and related improvements. Asst. Chief Anderson said they anticipate going to bid mid January 2001 and awarding the bid in February. Asst. Chief Anderson said anticipated construction completion is six (6) months. Asst. Chief Anderson said the renovations are 100% impact fee funded. Asst. Chief Anderson asked the Committee members if they would be receptive to approving funding and Skip said that the committee is receptive to issues dealing with the safety and well being of the community. VIII. PUBLIC COMMENT /OTHER DISCUSSION Skip advised the members that Jozsef Kelemen had contacted the Real Property Management Department that he has moved to Golden Gate City and would no longer be able to serve as a committee member. Toni was directed to obtain a letter of resignation from Jozsef and following the holidays to advertise the vacancy. IX. NEXT PROPOSED MEETING DATE - MONDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2001 (7:00 P.M.) All members approved. X. ADJOURNMENT Karen made a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:40 p.m. Matt seconded the motion, and the meeting was adjourned. 16j 'GOLDEN GATE ESTATES LAND TRUST COMMITTEE MONDAY, FEBRUARY 26, 2001 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES BRANCH LIBRARY f Charles ( "Skip ") VanGelder Matthew Hudson - Chairman - Vice - Chairman (absent) Stephen Greenberg - Member Karen Acquard - ember Toni Mott - upervisor, Real Property Management Department Linda Sujevich ��`� - Secretary, Real Property Management Department e oo Tom White C,0\0 ,OA - Commander, Emergency Service Chief Diane Flagg -Chief, Collier County Emergency Service Chief Kovarik -Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue District DISTRIBUTION: Letter from Michael Kirk, Collier County School Board Resignation letter from Jozsef Kelemen GAC Advisory Board Committee Report from Charles Van Gelder Letter from Golden Gate Estates Area Civic Association Excerpt from 1983 Agreement Schedule of Revenue and Expenditure for FY 00 /01 as of January 31, 2001 I. CALL TO ORDER Skip VanGelder, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.. IL APPROVAL OF MINUTES- December 11, 2000. Karen made a motion to accept the minutes. Stephen seconded the motion, and the minutes were approved. III. APPROVAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT Toni reported an Ending Cash Balance of $609,476.80, and an Available Cash Balance of $486,752.20. Stephen made a motion to accept the treasurer's report. Karen seconded the motion. All in favor. -- Toni informed the members that 30 lots are currently under contract for sale. Toni stated there will be less than 60 acres available for sale once these closings take place. However, the lands on the reserved list are not included in this total. IV. BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT- Maximum Expenditure of $50,000 (design) Toni stated that Chief Kovarik has approved the payment of two (2) invoices totaling $1,238. Chief Kovarik has advised that the District will be unable to expend all the funds prior to the expiration of the Agreement on May 22, 2001. Chief Kovarik would like to request the committee approve a six (6) month extension to the Agreement. Toni said the existing Agreement is still in effect, an Amendment can be processed. Skip made a motion to approve an Amendment to Agreement providing for a six (6) month extension. Stephen seconded the motion. All other terms and conditions of the original Agreement will remain the same. A letter of no objection will have to be obtained from Avatar. 16J 2 V. GOLDEN GATE FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT — Maximum Expenditure of $12,500 (C.E.R.T. Equip.). At the December 11, 2000 meeting, the committee approved a six (6) month extension to the Agreement to provide for the expenditure of funds. However, as a result of the Agreement expiring on November 22, 2000 it will be necessary to process a new Agreement. Skip made a motion to approve a new Agreement with the Golden Gate Fire Control & Rescue District authorizing the expenditure of $12,500. for the purchase of C.E.R.T. Equipment. Stephen seconded the motion. A letter of no objection will have to be obtained from Avatar. VL COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION- Maximum Expenditure of $50,000 (Fitness Equipment) At the December 11, 2000 meeting, Skip requested Toni contact Murdo Smith, Parks & Recreation Department, advising him of the expiration date for the expenditure of these funds. Toni said that Mr. Smith informed her the funds would be spent prior to the expiration of the Agreement on November 8, 2001. Stephen asked if construction of the building had commenced. Discussion followed that Parks & Recreation had anticipated completion by the end of the summer. Toni was directed to contact Murdo Smith to request the anticipated completion date for the fitness complex. It was stated that perhaps the equipment will be purchased and stored for future use. VII. LETTER DATED JANUARY 18, 2001 FROM SCHOOL BOARD - Request to utilize reserved lands The school board is requesting the removal of two (2) parcels from the reserved list; Unit 72, All of Tract 2, 5.68 acres and Unit 72, All of Tract 3, 5.58 acres. Stephen asked if it was for mitigation purposes and Toni said no, the school board is attempting to purchase adjacent lots and assemble for the future construction of an elementary school. The anticipated opening date would be August of 2004. Pursuant to the provisions contained in the 1983 Agreement with Avatar, if it is acceptable to the committee, the County can convey the lands to the school board for no compensation. In addition, a letter of no objection would have to be obtained from Avatar. Toni suggested that perhaps some verbiage should be included in the conveyance to provide for deed restrictions to limit the use of the site for school purposes only and include a mandatory completion date as to the construction of the school. Skip suggested the County Attorney's Office be requested to render a legal opinion on the issue. Toni advised the Board that she hadn't contacted the County Attorney's Office on this issue, but did discuss it at length with Sandra Taylor, former Real Property Management Director, who stated it is acceptable. Skip felt the committee should obtain the County Attorney's Office opinion as to the legality of transferring the lands without compensation prior to the committee taking any action and making a formal recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. All committee members were in favor of Toni requesting an opinion from the County Attorney's Office on this issue. VIII. CHIEF DIANE FLAGG & COMMANDER TOM WHITE — EMS Station #17 Chief Flagg advised the committee members that she wanted to provide them with an update on the status of EMS Station #17, Golden Gate. The project manager is Commander Tom White and he showed the floor plans for the new facility. Commander White said there is no electricity in the building at the present time, but he would provide the members with a guided flash light walk- through at the conclusion of the meeting. Commander White said the anticipated open house dedication is scheduled for April 6, 2001, which coincides with 20 years of service by the Collier County EMS. Commander White said it should be quite a celebration. 16J 2 1 Karen questioned the elevation of the facility and Commander White said it is higher than required to provide the proper slope for the septic system and the facility would be utilized for a command center in the event of a hurricane. Commander White said the building is rated to withstand 130 mph or a category "3" hurricane. Skip said it is his understanding that a traffic light is to be installed at this intersection. Commander White said the traffic light is scheduled for installed upon the completion of the Golden Gate Boulevard improvements. Commander White said the station has been pre -wired to provide for a pre - emption device that would turn the light red in all directions enabling them to exit the station. Commander White said the painting is done and the fixtures are in place, but no furniture. Commander White said that at a future date he would be requesting the committee's approval for funding to purchase furniture. The members will tour the new facility after the meeting. UL CHIEF KOVARIK — BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT Chief Kovarik provided the floor plans for proposed Station #12. Chief Kovarik stated he would like to expand the existing plans to include EMS. The committee members were in agreement that, when feasible, it is advantageous for the Fire Department & EMS to be housed together. Upon completion of Station #12, the existing Big Corkscrew Island Fire Control & Rescue Station will be shut down and utilized as a maintenance and storage facility. Chief Kovarik said Station #17 is abetter location as it provides better access to the surrounding area. Skip suggested that the committee members be provided the final plans and the costs associated with same. Chief Kovarik said that he would provide this information at the next committee meeting. X. PUBLIC COMMENT /OTHER DISCUSSION A. Letter of resignation from Jozsef Kelemen A letter of resignation was received from Jozsef Kelemen. Toni advised the members that the vacant position has been published. However, to date, no applications have been received. Skip made a motion to accept Jozsef Kelemen's letter of resignation, Karen seconded the motion. All in favor. Karen said she is aware of some individuals that were interested in serving on the committee, but were not familiar with the district representation requirement. Karen asked if this matter could be clarified for potential candidates. Toni stated that the press release outlines what Units the applicants must reside in. The stated that their tax bills would provide them this information or if they were to call Real Property, we would be happy to assist them. B. Committee Review In accordance with Ordinance 86 -41 the Board of County Commissioners shall review all advisory boards every four (4) years. The GAC Land Trust Committee is scheduled to be reviewed at the March 13, 2001 BCC meeting. Skip's written report has been forwarded to the Commission. A copy of same was provided for all the members review. However, it is necessary to make an oral presentation on March 13th. Skip said he would be out of town and Matt Hudson agreed to represent the committee. Skip stated that when the oral presentation is made it needs to be noted that the committee meets bi- monthly and not monthly as contained in the report. 16J 2 C. Letter dated February 21, 2001 from GGE Area Civic Association — Fund Request The GGE Area Civic Association requested funds for median beautification along Golden Gate Boulevard once the project is completed. Toni stated that funds could not be approved for this purpose pursuant to Item #5 of the 1983 Agreement with Avatar, which reads as follows: "neither the property donated nor the proceeds from the sale of any dedicated property shall be used for the purposes of acquisition, construction or maintenance of roads and bridges, or similar projects." A copy was provided for the members review. Toni stated that she has requested the County Attorney's Office to render a legal opinion that they concur. Toni will provide the members with the legal opinion at the next meeting so the committee can respond to the request. Karen requested Toni provide Commissioner Coletta a packet similar to the one that is provided to new committee members. Toni will forward. X. NEXT PROPOSED MEETING DATE — MONDAY, APRIL 23, 2001 (7:00 P.M.) All members approved. XI. ADJOURNMENT No other discussion. Skip made a motion that the meeting be adjourned at 7:30 P.M. Karen seconded the motion. All in favor. GOLDEN GATE ESTATES LAND TRUST COMMITIJ ,. ' J a MONDAY, APRIL 23, 2001 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES BRANCH LIBRARY Nt f' %4 `�F-) Charles ( "Skip ") VanGelder - Chairman a' Matthew - Hudson - Vice - Chairman (absent)'` Stephen Greenberg - Member Karen Acquard - Member Toni Mott V'0%0 t -Supervisor, Real Property Management Department "o, 55�� e Linda Sujevich N6 rim - Secretary, Real Property Management Department aN� Dave Anderson GoNOVO - Assistant Chief, Golden Gate Estates Fire Control and Rescue District I. CALL TO ORDER Skip VanGelder, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.. H. APPROVAL OF MINUTES- February 26, 2001. Karen noted a change to be made to the minutes. Under Item Number Nine, the Station number should be 12. Karen made a motion to accept the minutes. Steve seconded the motion and the minutes were approved as amended. M. APPROVAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT Toni reported an Ending Cash Balance of $619,030.24, and an Available Cash Balance of $495,884.64. Skip made a motion to accept the treasurer's report. Karen seconded the motion. All in favor. IV. BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT- Maximum Expenditure of $50,000 (design) Toni informed the members that a Letter of No Objection had been received from Avatar Properties Inc. and the appropriate agenda item submitting the Amendment to Agreement would be presented to the Board of County Commissioners on May 22, 2001. V. GOLDEN GATE FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT — Maximum Expenditure of $12,500 (C.E.R.T. Equip.). Toni informed the members that a Letter of No Objection had been received from Avatar Properties Inc. and the appropriate agenda item submitting the Agreement would be presented to the Board of County Commissioners on May 22, 2001. VI. COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION - Maximum Expenditure of $50,000 (Fitness Equipment) Toni stated that Murdo Smith, Parks & Recreation Manager, had advised they will begin ordering the equipment in June and hope the delivery of same will coincide with the completion of the complex. Murdo is aware that the funds must be spent prior to the expiration of the Agreement on November 8, 2001. VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER VACANCY 16J Toni stated that the last press release advertising the vacant position was published on March 5, 2001 and to date, no response has been received. VIIL UPDATE COMMITTEE REPORT— Presented to BCC on March 13, 2001 Matt Hudson attended the BCC meeting on behalf of the Committee to make an oral presentation. The anticipated time for the item to be heard was shortly after 9 a.m. Unfortunately Matt was unable to make his presentation until 4:30 p.m., thus resulting in spending the entire day in the Commission meeting. The BCC praised the committee and encouraged them to continue their hard efforts. IX. UPDATE SCHOOL BOARD — Request to utilize reserve lands Toni informed the members that an opinion had been received from the County Attorney's Office stating that the County may transfer ownership of two parcels to the School Board for no compensation. The opinion also concurred that the Deed should include restrictions that limit the use of the site for school purposes with a mandatory completion date and if these conditions fail to be met, the property shall revert back to the County. In addition, a letter of no objection will have to be obtained from Avatar. Skip made a motion to approve the transfer of Unit 72, All of Tract 2 containing 5.68 acres and Unit 72, All of Tract 3 containing 5.58 acres to the School Board, with the appropriate verbiage outlining deed restrictions and reverter clause. Karen seconded the motion. All in favor. A letter of no objection will be obtained from Avatar. X. UPDATE GOLDEN GATE ESTATES AREA CIVIC ASSOCIATION - Request for funds Toni informed the members that an opinion had been received from the County Attorney's Office stating that median beautification falls under the maintenance of roads or similar projects and is therefore not a legitimate expenditure of funds under the 1983 Agreement. All committee members were in agreement that the foregoing request should be denied and Toni was directed to send a letter to the GGE Area Civic Association explaining the reason for the denial of funds. XL MEMORANDUM DATED MARCH 1, 2001 from County Attorney David C. Weigel Attorney Weigel offered an informational workshop presenting Sunshine Law and Public Records Law. The committee members stated that they have all received informational packets regarding the above topics and didn't feel it was necessary to coordinate a workshop unless there were new laws that they need to be aware of as a committee member. XII. LETTER DATED MARCH 12, 2001 FROM NICHOLS REALTY, INC. — Request to purchase reserved land A letter had been received to purchase Unit 195, Tract 85, GGE, currently held on the reserved list for future marketability. The list of reserved lands are scheduled to be presented to the BBC again in 2004. Skip made a motion to deny removing this parcel from the reserved list at this time. Karen seconded the motion. All in favor XIII. GOLDEN GATE FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT — Request for funds Assistant Chief Dave Anderson provided each committee member with a brochure displaying a 3000 gallon pumper /tanker fire truck. Assistant Chief Anderson stated that the proposal dated April 9, 2001 provides a purchase price of $213,435 and is good for 30 days. Assistant Chief Anderson said that 16J 2 impact fees couldn't be utilized and would like to request funding approval for the total purchase price. The committee members unanimously agreed that there is definitely a need for the fire truck and suggested partial funding. Discussion followed. Skip made a motion to approve a maximum expenditure of $110,000 toward the purchase of the 3000 gallon pumper /tanker fire truck to be purchased within one year. Karen seconded the motion. All in favor. XIV. PUBLIC COMMENT/OTHER DISCUSSION On April 6, 2001 the new EMS Station #17 located on Golden Gate Boulevard had their open house. Skip and Karen were able to attend and were presented with a plaque in appreciation of the funds provided from the GAC Land Trust Committee. Skip said it was a very nice ceremony. Skip suggested the plaque be displayed in the offices of the Real Property Management Department. Toni accepted the plaque and assured the members it would be displayed. XV. NEXT PROPOSED MEETING DATE — MONDAY, JUNE 25, 2001 (7 :00 P.M.) All members approved. XVL ADJOURNMENT No other discussion. Skip made a motion that the meeting be adjourned at 7:34 P.M. Karen seconded the motion. All in Favor. Fiala Carter _— __ ---- 1 Henning b Coyle J. Colette ;,.GOLDEN GATE ESTATES LAND TRUST COMMITTEE MONDAY, AUGUST 13, 2001 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES BRANCH LIBRARY Charles ( "Skip ") VanGelder Matthew Hudson Stephen Greenberg Karen Acquard Toni Mott Department Linda Sujevich Joy Dawson - Chairman - Vice - Chairman (absent) - Member - Member - Supervisor, Real Property Management - Secretary, Real Property Management Department - Member applicant DISTRIBUTION: Schedule of Revenue and Expenditure for FY 00 /01 as of May 31, 2001 Schedule of Revenue and Expenditure for FY oo /01 as of June 30, 2001 Chief Kovarik request to utilize equipment trade and RLS to CAO Transportation Operations request for funding I. CALL TO ORDER Skip VanGelder, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.. H. APPROVAL OF MINUTES -APRIL 23, 2001. Karen stated she would like to receive the meeting minutes in a more timely manner and Toni advised that staff would try their best to do so. Steve made a motion to accept the minutes. Skip seconded the motion. All in favor. III. APPROVAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT Toni reported an Ending Cash Balance of $687,131.14 and an Available Cash Balance of $568,151.04. However, this does not take into consideration the $110,000 that was approved at the last meeting for the Golden Gate Fire Control & Rescue District towards the purchase of a pumper /tanker. The actual Available Cash Balance is $458,151.04. Karen made a motion to accept the Treasurer's report. Steve seconded the motion. All in favor. IV. BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT - Maximum Expenditure of $50,000 (design) Toni stated the $50,000 has been expended for design and all invoices have been paid in full. D 16J 2-14 V. GOLDEN GATE FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT — Maximum Expenditure of $12,500 (C.E.RT. Equip.). Toni stated we have processed one invoice in the amount of $6,143.04 to reimburse the District. Their remaining available balance is $6,356.96 to use prior to November 22, 2001. They are aware of this deadline date and have stated there are a few more pending invoices that will utilize the remaining balance. Skip asked if they were getting a team or group together. Toni stated she understood they had their first class. Steve stated he was talking to people in North Naples. North Naples has a huge group and they are joint - training with Golden Gate. VL COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION- Maximum Expenditure of $50,000 (Fitness Equipment) Toni stated, to date, no activity although she had spoken to Murdo, Parks and Recreation, reminding him the Agreement expires on November 8, 2001. Murdo said they anticipate the equipment being delivered mid September. Karen said Birdie Allen has been appointed the supervisor at Max Hasse Park. Toni will keep in touch with Murdo and Birdie Allen regarding the arrival of the fitness equipment. VII. COMMITTEE MEMBER VACANCY An application had been received from Joy Dawson for the committee member vacancy. She resides in Phase II. Currently there are three members located in Phase I and one member located in Phase III. Joy attended the meeting to be interviewed by the committee members. Skip explained there are restrictions with respect to the number of committee members from each Phase. Joy stated that she became a citizen on September 19th, 2000 and decided she wanted to become involved in the community. Steve, Skip and Karen described why the GAC Land Trust Committee was formed and how the funds are collected and disbursed. Skip made a motion to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that Joy Dawson be appointed to the GAC Land Trust Committee. Karen seconded the motion. All in favor. VIII. LETTER DATED JUNE 15, 2001 FROM SCHOOL BOARD — REQUEST FOR FUNDS A letter dated June 15, 2001 was received from the School Board requesting GAC funding in the amount of $150,000. The funds were requested to help defray costs associated with the purchase of property and design fees for the new Golden Gate Estates elementary school. No specific monetary information was provided. Karen said she rejects this request because it is too general. Karen stated she would be in favor of approving funding for specific items needed to assist students in the classrooms. Steve was in agreement with Karen and stated that if the School Board could provide documentation that funds were required to purchase computers or offset other costs associated with assisting students, he would be in favor of approving. Skip also agreed stating he will not recommend approving and funds for a blanket request. Toni was directed to send a letter to Mr. Dave Lesansky at the School Board explaining the reason for the denial of funds at this time, but to advise them that the committee would be receptive to future requests that are more specific. It was noted that schools must be located within the area outlined in the 1983 Agreement to receive funding assistance. 16J 2 Skip stated that Toni had provided the most recent land values for the two (2) parcels --that were approved to be conveyed to the School for no compensation. Skip said the total land value for both parcels is $32,800. IX. BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT — Request to utilize truck trade -in Toni stated that the June 23, 1987 Agreement between the District and the County provided an expenditure of GAC funds in the amount of $100,000 for the purchase of a fire (pumper) truck. Chief Kovarik would like to know if it is possible for the District to utilize the value of the truck (approximately $30,000) as a trade -in towards the purchase of another truck. Chief Kovarik said the new truck would still be based in Golden Gate Estates at Station #12. The committee would like to see in writing the cost of the new truck and the value of the trade -in at the next meeting before making any recommendations. Toni was directed to contact Chief Kovarik for the relevant information. X. COLLIER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION /OPERATIONS - Request for Funds During a budget workshop, a Commissioner asked if GAC funds could be utilized to purchase the following transportation operations equipment: pick -up truck at $30,000, one fifteen yard dump truck at $85,000, and three mobile radios at $3,600. The vehicles and equipment would be utilized for a new drainage crew performing work in the Golden Gate Estates area. Toni provided the members a copy of the questions she had requested Mr. Kant, Transportation Department, to provide with respect to type of work, location of work and time frame involved. Mr. Kant's responses were also provided for the committee's review. Toni said that based on the information provided by Mr. Kant, it seems the funding request isn't consistent with the 1983 Agreement. The committee members were in agreement that this request is outside the parameters established in the 1983 Agreement. Skip requested Toni to have the County Attorney's office provide a legal opinion on said issue. If the attorney's office concurs with the committee's opinion, Toni was directed to send a letter to Transportation that the request isn't a legitimate expense under the 1983 Agreement. XI. PUBLIC COMMENT/OTHER DISCUSSION Karen informed the members that on Thursday, August 23, 2001, a workshop on Mobility Network in Golden Gate Estates will be held here at the Golden Gate Library from 4 p.m. to 7 p.m. The workshop will not have any main focus, but will provide County staff to answer questions on existing and future transportation projects located in Golden Gate Estates. They are looking to obtain input from the public. XH. NEXT PROPOSED MEETING DATE —Monday, October 22, 2001 (7 :00 p.m.) All members approved. No other discussion. Skip requested a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:29 p.m.. Steve made a motion to adjourn and Karen seconded the motion. All in favor. Fiala 16J Carter _ Henning Coyle Colatta GOLDEN GATE ESTATES LAND TRUST COMMITTEE *APPROVED MONDAY, OCTOBER 22, 2001 G LDEN GATE ESTATES BRANCH LIBRARY ��s, Charles ( "Skip ") VanGelder - Chairman Matthew Hudson - Vice - Chairman Stephen Greenberg - Member Karen Acquard - Member Joy Dawson - Member (arrived 7:10 p.m.) Toni Mott Linda Sujevich - Supervisor, Real Property Management Department - Secretary, Real Property Management Department DISTRIBUTION: Copy of August 16, 2001 letter to Dave Lesansky, School Board Copy of October 5, 2001 memorandum from Commissioner Carter Excerpt from Ordinance No. 87 -48 L CALL TO ORDER Skip VanGelder, Chairman, called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M.. II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES- AUGUST 13, 2001. Karen made a motion to accept the minutes. Skip seconded the motion. All in favor. W. APPROVAL OF TREASURER'S REPORT Toni reported an Ending Cash Balance of $674,414.92 and an Available Cash Balance of $502,212.36. The committee requested an undated inventory list of the remaining properties and Toni advised she would have this information for the members at the next meeting. Karen seconded the motion. -All in favor. IV. GOLDEN GATE FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT — Maximum Expenditure of $12,500 (C.E.R.T. Equip.) Toni stated, to date, they have expended $6,143.04, which leaves them a remaining balance of $6,356.96. However, there is one outstanding invoice in the amount of $4,922.93 being processed for payment. The District is aware that the Agreement expires November 22, 20011. Matt stated he took the required training course and is a member of the C.E.R.T. Team Matt informed the members that the District did an excellent job of expending the funds for the program. Matt advised that the course materials are FEMA approved and stated the training was very informative and recommended everyone take the course. Matt stated there are more potential classes planned in the future. 16J 2 V. COLLIER COUNTY PARKS & RECREATION — Maximum Expenditure of $50,000 (Fitness Equip.) Toni indicated the equipment has been received and we are waiting for an invoice to process the payment. They expended $49,985.65 and the Agreement expires November 18, 2001. VI. GOLDEN GATE FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE DISTRICT — Maximum Expenditure $110,000 (Water Tanker) Toni advised the members there has been no activity and the Agreement expires July 31, 2002. VII. LETTER DATED SEPTEMBER 12, 2001 - from School Board - Funding Requests Toni advised the members that Karen had asked for a copy of the letter that was sent to the School District informing them the committee wouldn't approve blanket funding. The School Board indicated they will make another request at a later date. VIII. BIG CORKSCREW ISLAND FIRE CONTROL & RESCUE- Request to utilize truck trade -in Toni stated that Chief Kovarik had provided a trade -in quote of $40,500. and planned on attending the meeting to discuss the new truck cost. IX. COLLIER COUNTY TRANSPORTATION /OPERATIONS - Request for Funds Skip stated that Avatar Properties Inc. had concurred with the committee and County Attorney's opinion that the request wasn't a legitimate expenditure within the authority of the Agreement. X. PUBLIC COMMENT /OTHER DISCUSSION Karen indicated to Matt that this is the first meeting he has attended this year. Matt replied that he has attended a meeting and in addition he represented the GAC Land Trust Committee at the Board of County Commissioner's meeting in March, which was an all day adventure. Matt advised one meeting he was unable to attend was due to a schedule conflict at work and another meeting he was on vacation. Matt stated his absence was definitely not due to a lack of interest in the committee. Matt said that he has been a member since the inception of the committee and it is his intent to serve for a very longtime. Toni advised the members that a memorandum had been received from Commissioner Carter requesting the completion of the report of minority and physically disabled committee appointments. Toni was directed to complete the form on behalf of the committee and forward to the commissioners' office. XI. NEXT PROPOSED MEETING DATE - Monday, December 17, 2001 (7:00 p.m.) All members approved. XII. ADJOURNMENT No other discussion. Skip requested a motion to adjourn the meeting at 7:25 P.M. Karen made a motion to adjourn the meeting and Matt seconded the motion. All in favor. Memorandum To: Sue Filson, Executive Manager Board of County Commissioners - From: Linda Sujevich, Administrative Secret Real Property Management Departmen Date: January 18, 2002 Subject: Golden Gate Estate Land Trust Committee Dear Sue, Attached are the minutes you have requested from the above mentioned committee. Thank you, Linda Office of the County Administrator 16J 2 1611 2 HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES ADVISORY COMMITTEE AGENDA MEETING DATE: December 20, 2001 MEETING TIME: 3:30 p.m. LOCATION: Board Of Elections Training Room Building B - Martin Luther King Bldg. Collier County Government Complex 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 I. CALL TO ORDER II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Minutes of November 29, 2001 III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA IV. OLD BUSINESS a) Nomination and election of Officers 1. Chairman 2. Vice - Chairman 3. Secretary V. NEW BUSINESS Fiala Carter Henning Coyle Coletta a) Discussion of: 1. Assessment from the County regarding what social services and public health departments do and the amount of money allocated for each, supplied by Leo Ochs. 2. Discuss final report of Health Care Study, Recommendation and Business Plan provided by Tom Schneider. 3. Discuss and review the services that the county provides, supplied by Leo Ochs. VI. FUTURE MEETING DATES a) Recommending the third Thursday of Every Month in the Martin Luther King Bldg. — Elections Training Room, Building B on the Collier County Government Campus. January 17, 2002; February 21, 2002; March 21, 2002; April 18, 2002; May 16, 2002 and June 20, 2002 IV. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT V. ADJOURNMENT �QZ 16J 2 HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE MINUTES December 20, 2001 Members Present Joe Paterno Ed Morton William Lascheid Ernie Bretzmann Dee Whinnery William Sakamoto Mark Rhein Petra Jones Members Absent George Drobinski Ed Fergusan Susan Luenberger Fielding Epstein Tina Osceola Keith Riley County Staff Present Commissioner Jim Coletta Dr. Joan Colfer, Health Department Director Barry Williams, Social Service Director, Collier County Nancy Rosiak, Executive Aide to the BCC John Ferrell, Mgr. Senior Program Services, Collier County Others Present Tom Schneider, Former Chairman of Health Care and Finance Committee Wesley Jones, Business Mgr. Collier County Health Department 16J 2 Call to Order: Joe Paterno brought the meeting to order and requested that everyone introduce themselves. There was not a quarum present, so there could be no approval of the minutes. The meeting was turned over to Barry Williams, Social Services Director, Collier County. He passed out packets including "Social Services Dental Fund, and Social Services Service Procedures ". He explained what the Health Department does and the Dollars allocated. Required services manadated by the state are: 1. Medicaid County Billing for In Patient Hospitalization. Pays a portion of patient's stay. Each hospital determines what the per diem rate is and they pay a portion of that. 2. Nursing Home — Required to pay a portion of patient's stay, approximately $55 per person per month. 3. Indigent Burial — Lake Trafford Cemetary used 4. Abused Child Evaluation includes medical exam 5. Person injured out of the county and treated outside of the county— we pay if they don't have means to pay. Mr. Williams went on to discuss another program offered — he refered to spreadsheet which described last year's expenses. We have a Network of providers that refer people to us for services that they need such as doctors visit, professional fees associated with that, hospital in patient charges and medicine and drugs for people below poverty level. We secure a portion of the payment. Funds capped each year and they pay until they're out of money. Profile of people are 50 years old with average income of $500 month. Some programs are state mandated and some are descretionary. State mandated is $1,700,000. Discussion regarding how they determine if a person is a resident of the county and Mr. Williams replied that there is a protocol that they follow. There is no designated period of time that they must be here to be classified as a resident. John Ferrell, Manager Senior Program Services explained the Senior Services program for seniors 60 and above. Primarily grant funded from state and federal. $2,000,000 grant funded with County Support of $110,000 year matching to fulfill matching fund requirements for the grants and to support some of the administrative costs. 832 elders served each year with exception of alheismer disease. Typical services are: 1. Basic in -home care — care management determines need. $3500 per year to keep in home. 2. Rhein asked what the difference was per service units and total clients. What is the difference between service units provided under your scheme and total client contact shown under social services general fund category? Ferrell, client will 16"J 2 use 6 units of services a week. Discussion regarding if there is an income level that a person must have to qualify for this and the response was under the old americans act, no there is not. State programs have a basic income limit as well as medicaid waiver has an income limit. Medicaid waiver, I believe is $680 off the top of my head. Discussion of are the funds that you have enough to carry you from one year to another and the response was, that it is, but it is getting tight. We're looking right now at loosing one of our programs, "Homecare for the elderly program" which provides subsidies to the caregivers. Discussion on whether we ever coordinate with other charities, such as Catholic Charities who have an elderly outreach to see if we could get that on the not for profit sector? Response was one of the requirements for the grants is that we explore all the resources. Discussion on how many request services who's need are unmet and the response was that we have a waiting list of 88 people. We constantly use 25 % through attrition. We maintain anywhere from 60 — 80 individuals on a waiting list. Discussion on whether we have some sort of graph that shows the shortcomings and whether the county tracks the referalls. There is no graph. Discussed that they follow up on referrals within 2 weeks to see if those needs are being met. Because we don't want individuals to be left out. Rhein — You said you have $110,000 county matching and you get a million something so it looks like you have a 12 to 1 ratio. Ferrell — Correct. Rhein — If you're looking at the 84 people what would be the necessary funds to generate those funds out of the state. Bretzmann — If more local dollars are available would that open up more funds at the state level, or are you maxed out at the state level? Ferrell — no, we're maxed out at the state level. Bretzmann — so even if there were local funds avail, you couldn't — Ferrell — Correct — our funding is based on population statistics. One of the benefits that we have is that our population has grown so rapidly that we have been able to keep up with the demand. Bretzmann — Do you know how we compare to the other counties regarding the waiting list? Is that kind of a norm 5 — 10% on the waiting list. Ferrell — Yes, Lee County is is 160 — 165, of course their needs and funding is much more than ours because of the elder population. We for our size have a very large waiting list. As our funding decreases in the state, hopefully our federal funding increases to make up for that shortfall. Wayne Sakamoto -Can you receive private contributions? Coletta — you might want to be careful with moving contributions from the non profit sector and moving it into the government sector. We might want to direct it to something like Catholic charities. Sakamoto mentioned fund raising. Ferrell stated that they don't do much fund raising but do have some donations during christmas — women gave $600 to pass out, work with Salvation Army, so we try to work with existing non profits when we can when we're sharing clients. Sakamoto — When they're filtered through different organizations, is that accounted for? Then going back to my previous question, have you received provided contribution. Ferrell — We receive very small amounts of private contributions. We do a survey once a year as far as our standard of services. With those surveys, we solicite contributions for what we did. Those are very small, we're only talking about 400 to 500 hundred dollars. Most individuals that are able to pay a co -pay for the services which generate another $22 - $24,000 per 16J 2 i year, which goes to pay for that care for individuals who can't afford it. Who are unable to pay for the services. And, it's not a contribution, it's an accessment of a co -pay that makes up some of the shortfall that would get through the grain. Joan Colfer spoke regarding Budgeting and discussed the brochure listing 40 different services. State organization — not county organization. She reviewed state and county contribution. Majority funds comes from the State. Communical Disease, personal health/primary care, Environmental Health and Engineering and at the bottom, there is Expanded Services, the request for this year, and that included $7,500,000 for primary care, $250,000 for O.B., $60,000 for dental and I think health was included in here. This is the county contribution ok. If you flip to the last page, and you look at the part in the box you can see a total that is about $3,000,000. The same for the personal health/primary care, you can see little bit of county funding that's left $133,000 plus the 2.8 million seasonal revenues, totalling $3,000,000 and the same for Environmental health and Engineering for a total of about $7,500,000 budget. There's also some other pieces of Medicaid funding that gets thrown in for a total of about another 1 million dollars. That's a quick summary. We do our own annual report. Dee Whinnery - Kids are off by 37 thousand under extended services. We don't have 66000 kids enrolled in Collier County. Colfer — I know that. I don't know where they got that number. Joe Paterno — Any more questions? O.K. Let's get Tom Snyder up here — Joe introduced Mr. Tom Schneider, Former Chairman of Health Care and Finance Committee. Tom distributed the Health Care Planning and Finance Committee Interem Report April 2001 and the Workshop material. He explained that he was the vice chair of the previous committee. He explained that he is very passionate about this issue. Findings of the first committee answering - Is there an access problem? No this committee needs to get up to speed of those findings and has a year in terms to the findings, recommendations of this committee. So, you'll have a real learning curve to catch up with those committees. It's that complex. It is a great personal commitment that requires passion. The results will come from the results that come from between meetings. You'll need to organize yourself in such a way — to have working subcommittees. First committee started 2 '/2 years ago. Tom 011iff and the previous director of the Health Department who speared this effort. This first committee determined that there are 30,000 people in Collier County under 65 who are uninsured. Most of these people are average ages of 19 -64. We also found that 43% of the school kids qualified for free lunch. This reinforces this, because it's their parents that are among the uninsured. Only 9% of people below 200% of poverty in 1999 actually had any type of dental service. No continuety of care or medical records. No care til a crisis. They had unneeded hospitalizations and emergency room visits. We made two recommendations to the BCC. 16J 2 One was to begin to plan for helping to create a public safety net in some form of public /private partnership. To provide the bulk, not all of the funding, for that in order to find a way to allow these people to be treated in a more cost efficient, cost effective up front cost through primary and preventative care where you got the best bang for the buck. Secondly we recommended that they appoint a second committee to find a solution to the problem. This huge problem that we identified. We got the approval of the BCC and that told us that they agreed with us that there was a huge problem. Final Report 2000 is the final report of the first committee. The second Committee proposed primary care for the uninsured. Original vision were excited with the Hillsburough Model in Tampa. They paid for all health care costs, not only primary care, but specialty care as well. And that probably cost them $3 -4,000 per person per year. This was paid for by a combination of sales and ad valorem tax. They expected voter referendum. We engaged Dave Roga, as a consultant which helped get them focused and we ended up with a recommendation that was different from the old one, that there was a shortage of primary care physicians in this community and therefore but not necessarily a big shortage in the federal community. We condluded that we wouldn't be able to rely on the primary care physicians of this community to offer to take care of this group of people at no reimbursement cost, so that's how we led into our recommendations that the county fund for some level of payment to primary care physicians. We visited with the medical society with Dr. Colfer, Dr. Laschied and made a presentation to them as to what the need was and asked to show their support for the county to get involved and received a unanimous support. We then followed that up with the Executive Board and received from them in writing their unanimous support for getting involved with this committee and to set up what we call "We Care" for the specialists and hospitals where they would accept the referral from our primary care physicians and agree to treat all of their specialty needs free of charge. So, as a result of this program, we came back to the county in April a year ago, 2001 with a written report and a presentation that asked them to agree to this proposed plan for Primary Care only, at an estimated cost of about $300 per year per head. And compare that to the Hillsburough Model that was $3 -4,000 per head per year and compare that to the average insurance premium for a family of about $2500. What we were asking the county to pay for was less than 10% of the annual cost of the premium to meet the needs of these people. We were getting the medical and hospitals to foot the rest of the bill. So that we thought that that was really a great bargain for the community. There was no way that we were ever going to get a referendum passed this year, because there were too many conflicting needs of the county, primary growth and conservancy with the land. The advice we were given was to pack off the total health care package and come back with a slower growth package that could be funded within the price of the current budget in any particular year. Administration said the 10'h of a mil concept came up, but ultimately turned out to be a major problem in terms of public relations aspect. It was intended to be a sign of committement from the BCC that they were serious about solving the problem and the committee would feel that they weren't going to be asked to spend 16J 2 ; another year working on this solution and only find out later that there was no commitment to do anything about it. Most importantly, we felt that that sign of commitment was necessary to actualy be able to negotiate with the medical community in various aspect of getting involved generate the consistance to solve the problem. The goal was for Better Care for More People for Less Money. We filled in the diagram in the piramid of care and talked about the primary care in the public /private partnership and we basically said give us a tentative approval in the budget for $2.8 million dollars, of which we needed about $2.1 million dollars to treat 7,000 people at $300 a head. And about $300,000 for administration and the rest was for the health department's planned programs which involved OBGYN, Dental care and Healthy Kids. And they did approve that and we gave them a punch list and we did that at a workshop in September for about 5 hours. We talked about the details of the proposed plan, who would be eligible (150% of federal poverty) they had to be working and uninsured between the ages of 19 -64. We talked about co -pay of $26 per person. And we talked about the delivery mechanism. We thought it best to open a neighborhood clinic pattererned after that of Dr. Lascheid's clinic but funded by the tax payers as opposed to hiring full time paid staff as opposed to using volunteers. We talked about a low cost pharmacy plan and we gave them a budget for 4 years to show what we anticipate what the budget would be. We talked about reimbursement methods to the primary physicians.We settled on cost plus arrangement, based on annual budget to serve so many people. We went into some detail with them and how that would work involving the medical sites, NCH and Cleveland Clinic. We discussed how the program would be administered. We would use the clinic itself and donated services of the TPA to help with the administration so there would be very little county or health department administration. There were some changes that took place between April and the time we finalized our recommendations in September. The committee decided that they wanted to reduce this by 150 %. So, a lot less people would be served, but they would be the most needy. They also needed time to start up. Couldn't do it by Oct. 1. Also needed time to reach that 7,000 people. And that is what the original figure of 1 /10th of a mil instead of starting with 20,000 est. people, starting with 7,000 and working up to 20,000 and starting at $2 million dollars and growing that to up to $6 or $7 million, by dropping the % from 200% to 150% and then focusing on the fact that no other plan in the U.S. had ever reached more than 65 of the eligible target population and recognizing that Bill Lascheid's Neighborhood Clinic and the Senior Project house were also already serving the same population. We concluded that a max. estimate based on today's population would be 7500 people and not 20,000 people that would be served by this plan. They planned to be at 2,000 in the first 6 months and then 5,000 the next year and 7,000 the next year and stayed at 7,000 and we basically showed that we could put this entire plan in place and it wouldn't cost the county more than $2 million dollars a year, based on today's 250,000 population of Collier County. We gained the Board's approval, had a workshop in September and when the BCC were the closests to the details and had the most information in terms of what our needs were and what our rec ommended findings were and the rational behind it, they approved this 16J 2 1 plan. They understood that it was a workable plan, a good value to the taxpayers and community, it would solve a large part, if not the entire problem, and it would represent some permanent solution and was economically advantagious to the county. It was taylored to meet the uniqueness of Collier County. The BCC resended this two months later because this was after September 11"' disaster, Commissioner Mac'Kie resigned, recessionary economy, state budget reduction, the defeat of the %2 cent sales tax for roads, anti growth feeling in the community in communication to the BCC. Those that opposed what was recommended.: TAG, Elderly poor over 65 who wouldn't benefit from this, Naples Daily News, Republication Party, lower middle -class working population not benefiting from this. One of the reasons they were against it was that it was an entitlement program and this fear in the community and antaginism. Fear of unbridled bureacratic growth. Especially in administration. Countless new jobs would be created to handle this. And, there was the argument that taxpayers were asked to pay for this entire program, not the businesses who were employing unisured workers. He pointed out that the ad valorem tax based on the statistics that they received from the county government, at least 15% of the assessed value of real estate was owned by commercial organizations and businesses, so that the fact that they were paying for 15 %, regardless whether they had insurance for their employees or not. So, we can conlude to summarize what I think is the recommended action by me anywhay, would be that that money is sitting there until this committee comes back with a recommendation that is bought into by at least 3 of the commissioners or that money will be put back into the general fund. We're close to a solution but I think it would make a lot of sense that would actually deal with some of the concerns that these other people have had. We might end up with a better plan that we had before. And that is that we make minor changes to our plan to mitigate and eliminate some, of those major objections. The first one would be to go to a grant program. This was brought up before and discussed with CHSI, which was our recommended providor, and by the way, the only provider in the community that responded to and RFP and RFI from the State Health Dept. in November of this year, to see if they had any interest in being considered to provide the service to this population that had been identified. And that would be a grant conception that would either go to one organization or another that would say — here you propose how you would use our money to create a neighborhood clinic that you would operate on your own and government wouldn't be involved, there would be no eligibility, no entitlement, open to all comers, they'd take anybody who had private insurance, medicaid, medicare, healthy kids or no insurance. And if you no insurance, you would qualify in some sliding fee scale. And if that organization which happened to be CHSI, which I personally and most of the committee believed, was the most logical organization to deliver that service. They would basically open up a greater Naples clinic and run it similar to the way they run the Feather Clinic in Immokalee. Which is no entitlement, sliding fee scales, etc. This would eliminate government bureaucy or administrative to 16J 21 create eligibility screaners and oversight and that type of thing. Based on the latest that I've seen from President and Governor Bush in terms of their support for federal qualified health care groups, one of which is CHSI. They are a federal qualified program. President Bush is putting 150 million dollars the additive every year into fq's to help solve this inunisured problem around the country.l believe he's convinced Governor Bush, for whatever reason, he has 4 1/3 or 5 million dollars set aside to do this very thing in Florida. And, if Collier County is serious about leveraging state and federal monies, this is the best way to have a successful chance to actually get State and Federal monies in here to help support that. It would require that the County could demonstrate that they have community support financially a local federally qualified plan. It would tend to distance the county government from the administration of this plan. The second thing I would be to seek ways to involve local business in support. The third thing would be to engage the community, organizations within the community and the community at large as well as those people who opposed it, I think we need to engage them and build on the efforts of what our committee has done. Get the pastors and priests to speak to their congretations about the need to help the less fortunate. This has been shown to be a extremely powerful tool. They have indicated that they are behind this. This requries passion and commitment. May have to separate your committee into health care versus other social services. You'll need other subcommittees for constituent building and public relations, is very important. If you want help with the learning curve, I suggest that you ask certain key members of our previous committee to be invited to steer your current committee and I think some of them would do that. Listen to what others have to say. Spend time with individual commissioners to help them understand where you're coming from and you rstand where they're coming from. And try to get their committement. Reach to commissioners and seek their view and assistance. Reach to the speakers bureau concept, so that your group gets represented out in the community, because it can't be done by one or two people. They're all singing from the same hymnal. Explan the problem and issue and accepting alternative solutions that might fit in seeking their ideas, concerns and commitments. If you try to do something substantially different from that, I think you'll have a hard time.I hope that this helps you. I suggest that you read and study those documents that were distributed. If you need myself or anyone else to come back and explain further, or answer questions, or be available by phone or to meet privately, that can be arranged. Tom Snyder took questions. Commissioner Coletta said that we we're going to do this for two years or at the end of two years we're going to be self sufficient or tie it into a referendum and tie it into something else. That may be something we need to look into. I would propose a small grant that we would try to get matching grants for that would be able to move this 16J 2 + forward into the limelight, take it for two or three years and we either have this thing self sufficient with grants coming in from other directions or we take it to referendum, or we find something else out there that would work. Discussion on having 700,000 in reserve. It was clarified that it was not really in reserve, it is in limbo. Discussion regarding the budget for serving the first 2,000 people, spread throughout the county, getting their care from one established place. One area we looked at is the French Quarter on Frank Goodlette, another in Golden Gate and another in East Naples. Why wouldn't we want to provide a grant to the Feather Clinic? CHSI would be the organization to open up a clinic here, where it's needed. Discussion about whether the 2,000 people were residents or transiet people. If we helped them this year, would these same people be here next year. The response was no, there is a fairly good flow and a lot of people actually get jobs and insurance coverage. At full build out of 7,000, the key is based on today, 250,000 people in Collier county, we have a good idea of the number of uninsured. As long as the population wouldn't grow, then we wouldn't expect the target population to grow. Based on the experience of every other plan we looked, not one reached more that 65% in any one year of the total target population they had. We targeted 30,000 but of that number, some are children that wouldn't qualify. Some make more money and chose not to be covered So out of that 30,000 target, we think maybe 13,000 or so would be potential target, and of that some of those roughly 2,000 are already being servicd by Bill Lascheid's Clinic and another 1,000 are being servicd by the senior friendship, so you drop that down and say, 65% of that remaining target is close to 7,00 people. As long as the 250,000 doesn't grow you don't have to be concerned that the 7000 people will grow. If the 250 grew to 300, you'd expect the 7000 to grow, but that you would have more citizens to pay for it, so the average cost wouldn't be any more. Discussion of dental care. The only dental included was $65,000 to allow Dr. Colpher's dental program to expand to start taking care of adults. Ed Morton discussed the fact that people living in poverty who do not have for whatever reason health insurance, do they deserve the same dignity of care as those young and elderly in our society. There are no federal or state program that addresses health care for working men and women. With the notable exception in the state of Floriday, Medicaid covers women who become pregnant regardless of age. The Medicare history makes for interesting reading. And why they adopted it. That those living in retirement didn't necessarily have the means to provide health care for themselves. This nation embrassed this and undertood the Medicare program. If you live in poverty, by defination, you do not have any resources to devote to anything. You are living in poverty. Then the functionality of the program becomes less vulnerable 16J 2' than the method of funding it. Who pays for it? Should it be the businesses where they work or the taxpayers? We're left for struggeling to find a method for funding it. So if we presume the general population agree the general population agree that people living in poverty deserve the same dignity as others and we move onto, how will we fund it, that seems to be significant step forward. And how to fund it most efficiently. I don't have a solution today, but I've talked to over 50 primary care doctors that are in private practice. The lowest number of people that they would see in their general practice is 3,000 the most was 9,000 people. We have some private practicing physicians on our staff that has as many as 9,000 patients. They talked about one solution, in the private sector the working men and women that I dealt with, they do provide primary care to men and women, and I talked with over 50 of them. The second is a very interesting notion here, and that is a tremendous number of specialists, and I believe that the hospitals agree, that without compensation that diseases caught in the early stages, their problems caught in the early stages would be addressed immediately at no cost to anybody. That was a major part of the program that somehow got lost in the translation because I think some thoughts were read into this an avoidance or transferance of cost, when indeed this might mean increased costs for the short term because people who have been denied care would automatically start to gain access to that care. Problems being dealt with on a real time basis would be accelerated and we'd start dealing with them on a real time basis. The people that I talked to that would be willing to do this acknowledged that if they came to the Emergency Room or they come to the hospital, we'd probably be caring for them regardless. What better way to agree to see them, but to see them in those stages of the illness and the problem when we can bring more dignity to the process that could preclude this from going into the next stage which those of us in the business where they become tragedies by the time they access the emergency room. Most people that I've talked to agree that people living in poverty deserve dignity of care. If so, then what is the best way to fund it and if so, what is the best way in funding it to achieve the most efficienty? I still think the private sector offers some interesting alternatives that I don't know how to fund this, but I'm going to sound rather ignorant of the facts, but I don't have the answer to this about whether or not businesses can be assessed any kind of an occupational license or fee, but if in fact one doctor can see, on the low side, 3000 people and in his or her office practice would incurr the normal cost of doing business, I cannot imagine a program like this in the private sector costing as much money as we chatted about here. I would be interested in getting some of our private sector guys to take a look at something and give us some ideas. Maybe it can be funded through the kinds of programs that we have read about, like impact fees or occupational fees, because I look at these numbers and we're only talking about even at this rate, a couple of hundred dollars per person per year in the first stages. Because all we're talking about is providing primary medicine. The real cost of this program is the pharmacutical products, specialists and the hospitals. This program would give rise to incredable dignity in my mind to many. And most of our data shows that most of these people living in poverty have a full time job. So, this has been mischaracterized. These people are working very hard. I think most people think they should have the same dignity. I would like for all people who have an opinion to read the legislative history of the medicare program in the mid 60's, because it is enlightening to look at what this nation embraced as an appropriate way of caring for people. I would think that this 16J 2 community would share the same sense of sympathy for those people and care that work here every day that have full time jobs that are absolutely living in poverty. I think that's a very powerful message. And I think that we may have not articulated it in the same way. Some discussion about sum of money that was funded. Jim Coletta said that the money was going to go down, so he got the Commission to put it in a holding pattern until they could come up with a better solution to the problem. The problem is that it is not going to fly in it's present set up. As a grant, possibly, maybe the private sector coming in, these are all workable things that could be done. I think we're going to have to lower our sights on this to start with and then try to grow it through the grants and other directions. People trust the private sector. I mean, Dr. Lascheid can do nothing wrong. He takes not public funds and makes sure he takes no public funds and his supporters expect him to take no public funds. So if we could emulate what he's doing right and get away from public funds as much as possible, in other words, maybe use public facilities maybe use something in the form of a grant, but our problem is that not so much the money that's in there not, the $700,000. Our problem actually came in year three where we were going to need over a million dollars. A million three, I think you're right. They were looking at that and that's where the panic set in and I could see I was going to lose that 3 vote. I wasn't going to be able to hold everything together, it wasn't going to happen. So, at that point and time I put everything into suspended animation to see what might be able to come up with. We're going to have to use our imaginations to see what we can do for a lot less money and be creative and involve the out side community and do it in the form of a grant that is non renewable, if necessary. In other words there would be no guarantee that the following year it would be in place. That's what people are concerned about, that it would grow to something beyond our ability of our community to financially handle it. I don't think that they're worried about the small number of dollars in there now, but what could be in the future. I may be reading this wrong, but I'm trying to get into their minds. I'm a tremendous supporter of this and for me to try to figure out what they're thinking is tough, but this is the feeling that I am getting that they feel uncomfortable with. I've never seen such organized resistance. In fact, TAG right now is starting a clinic to assist people in writing letters to the editor, which they're going to stack up and keep sending one after another. They know how to use the media they know how to use the PR. It's very easy to take the negative position and beat something into submission. Very hard to take a positive position and try to make something go. I don't envy any of you taking on the positions that you have and the people in the audience for showing an interest in this. You'll have people come up to you every now and then and asking you if you are out of your mind. People are going to start moving here from Afganistan just to take advantage of our welfare system. Someone commented that they liked Mr. Morton's idea of the tax on the occupational license, but we have to realize that if these individuals are working, the employer in most cases is providing coverage, worker's comp coverage. Keep in mind, if there are any illnesses or accidents due to work related situation, they will be covered by worker's comp. So, you need to realize this. On a legislative side, the Florida Association of Health Underwriters have lobbied with our legislatures, offering 16J 2 some sort of funding mechanism through the high risk pool, and this doesn't deal with the unisured, but the individuals that are unisurable and really I think it's a neat idea that if you could go to state legislatures to do like a 25 cent tax on all policies sold in the state of Florida assessed to individuals, groups as well as state employees, county employees too, and that would help fund the high risk pool. We would like to see that open up, because it's been closed for years. And, maybe, as part of our legislative efforts we could also ask some of the funding to come down to the county for the indigent here as well as the uninsured. And, thirdly, I want to find out from some of our members here, Dr. Colfer, if you followed up with Ed in regards to Tuesday's meeting with Lee Memorial Hospital and Lee County Commissioners about what they talked about, because they're concerned at Lee Memorial clearly indicates that we are sharing the same concerns that they and in that case dealing with the ER and trauma units. I wanted to see if that is any follow up on that. Ed Morton — There was an article in the Lee County papers about the number of trauma centers and hospitals having trouble nationwide. How many have closed this past year. The specific issue in Lee County has to do with the millions of dollars that are lost in the Trauma Center as it is situated. I think their community is undergoing some kind of debate now about that and the framing of the argument was, shouldn't trauma care and emergency medicine be due, at least with the same value as police and fire. And that anybody within a community never knows when they need it, but when they need it, they really need it to be good and they need it to be there. In emergency medicine, fire and safey, ambulence and police are entities are more extensions of public well being than they are of the province of any one institution. If that is the case, then the existance of a trauma center in communities of 400 -500 thousand people, may take on more value and merit because to the extent that Lee does not have one, then the thousand people that took advantage of it last year will loose the golden hour and mortality statistics skyrockets when you lose that golden hour. So now in Lee County they are losing million of dollars much of the business that they see comes from Coller County and Charlotte County and Glades County and Hendry. I don't know if Collier County reimburses them for any of that. But, as I understand it, over 400 Collier County, if not residents, then accidents occuring in Collier County, were transferred last year and that the cost to Lee County was very significant. They didn't put a dollar value on it, but they did tell me that they lose many many dollars on the hundreds of people who come up from Collier County. They intend to try to cover the loss. They handwriting is on the wall if something doesn't happen over a period of time, then it will be called in question. I think the question in our own community is that those people that were transferred last year who were trauma patients within a community of 350 thousand -400 thousand in the winter certainly between 250 and 300 thousand in the summer. Do we want to live in a community where that golden hour is very vulnerable and that people transferred to Lee County essentially die in the transport. And if we had one here locally, and maybe it would be more understood by the public than as a singular motion of an institution rather than an extension of public safety. So I don't think anything precipitious is going to happen in Lee County, but they did clearly state that they were losing millions and millions of dollars. 16J 2 Tom Snyder — I just wanted to address a couple of things and that is that doctor seeing 3,000 — 9,000 patients a year, I think I've heard those figures myself. But, I think when we put our budgets together, we did it on the basis of 2,000 patients a year and the reason for that is, number one you could have a language problem and number two you have people that have more than one illness, so we used 2,000 for that, but I think it would be difficult for someone who saw 5,000 a year to be able to see at this level. The second thing was talking about the occupational licenses and fees, what we failed to mention that we didn't meet many times with the legal department of the county and as a result of our specific questions we had two letters from outside legal council in Tallahassee who are supposedly the specialist in government law, dealing with government questions and issues and one of those is first of all, could we insist that every business doing business in the county carry insurance for their employees. The answer was a clear cut no, you can't do it, because it follows the arisal laws. One of the other questions that was asked was whether or not we could have a differential in the occupational license. Right now every business that does business has to pay an annual occupational license to them, so it could be possible, it's not a big number, $50 or so and could we charge more for those who didn't offer insurance or penalties to those as a way to gather a fee from the commerical side of the community that wasn't living up to their obligations. Four, could we charge more to every body and give a rebate back to those who order company insurance. And the answer was that we couldn't charge more to those who didn't offer insurance, there may have been a slight out as to whether you could give a rebate back, but it didn't amount to a whole amount of money. $600,000 a year is collected by the county for occupational license and we would have to really make a substantial jump in this fee to create that. If we go from $700,000 and we go to lets say to $500,000, and if we could get the commercial to pay for a $200,000 of that $500,000 then I think you have the beginnings of a allocable sharing of the costs between the individual taxpayers and the businesses. It's that sort of thing that I think is possible. Of course, Tom, remember too, I work with Suntrust and we have medical care insurance, so we cover all of our employees. You're also paying real estate taxes on your property, so the fact that the millage would go up to cover the added expense of the county, being the $700,000, you're going to pay a piece of it, so it isn't just the individual employer or employee that's paying for that, your boss, your business is also paying for part of that. Small businesses, they may not have it, because the owner and maybe one other employee may have it as a waiver because they've got coverage through a spouse's or may have an individual plan. Other situation now that insurance company wants to terminate coverage for a 3 or 4 person group where two people are waivering because they have coverage through the spouse, two are on the plan, and the thrid person is waivering because he can't afford it, that's not an eligible waiver. So you do have situations that because your insurance isn't affordable with the employer and because he or she doesn't have resources to pay for it. 16J 2 In that same vein, though, did you look into seeing whether the county had the ability to say we would only do business with those businesses that do have medical insurance coverage. That's another legal opinion we have from the outside legal council that says you cannot do that, but there's a slight out. No, the county cannot insist that we will only do business with those who offer insurance to their workers. However, they came back that you can informally use that as one of the considerations when you make your decision. The problem you have with that though, economically and realistically is that typically the company who is offering insurance to his employees, subsidising part of it are going to have higher cost structures than the other ones are, because you're going to bite yourself by awarding them contracts with the county to people who have a higher rate. So that's an indirect way of getting the taxpayer to pay for it, but he doesn't know it. Ed Morton. People of poverty can't afford one dollar. Joe Paterno — We need to decide where we are going to go from a committee structure. So this is I'm sure the major issue and there are a couple of us here and we need to try to figure out where we go and how to tackle this issue, but I know there are going to be several other issues based upon the study that's supposed to be brought to us at some point and time, we thought maybe today, but probably at the next meeting and that does not include health care in any respect. It's available in other issues. I would like to see us fill in the agenda for next time to discuss I think he made a real strong point is that it is really disolved where the dollars come from in front of submission. I don't think it's so much what we're trying to do or what the committee recommendation was it's where the money's coming from. We need to have a discussion on it, where we think we can come up with the dollars and then it's really a public perception, it's a PR issue. We have the notion that $400,000 from the private sector, but what could be done for x amount of dollars and I want to know what precidence could generated by occupational licence or fees, because that flex the argument that the money and the source of the revenues are coming from where the people work or kinda of deflects part of that argument. And, the other is the efficiency part of the equasion which is what the private sector and I think Ken you mean, let's hang an armadillo out there and see who would take it and where it's spent. The only thing I'm concerned about grants is that sooner or later they run out. And when grants run out then the program runs out then we're back to the same situation we were when we started. So we have to be cautious of that. I'd rather see us look at a source, some type of a reoccuring thing that comes every year, and we're confident that those dollars will flow. I like the idea of having someone look to see what are the number of occupational license that we have in the county. You might be surprised to see you might be looking at $2 - $3 per occupational license. 16J 2 W� $600,000 a year. Home based businesses too. So if we can get the novice to take a look at what the expenses might be and then look at other ways to come up with the dollars excessive. Tom Snyder - It would be my recommendation to the Commissioners to ask management of the county to come up with sources of funding, rather than to ask a group of citizens like you are and we were to do that, because they are the ones that are more knowledgeable about the ins and outs of the budget and know where things come from, and ask them to come back and make a presentation to the group. I think what you're doing you're potentially putting them in jeopardy with the commissioners for coming up with. I'd rather see us to come up with some of the ideas. How about we bring in some grant writers next time? The only thing I'm concerned about grants is that they run out. Some of them do and some of them go on for a long long time. Grants are just subject to dollars and sometimes those people who get the grants are in the same boat with the funding sources so. We could look at both the grants and the occupational licenses. Ed Morton - For instances, the occupational license is $35 you double it, you've got $600,000, maybe the private sector could see 10,000 people for primary medicine. Again the real cost here is for the hospitals and the specialists that would do the hard surgery and the complicated stuff for free! We're not talking about a big hunk of dough to the extent that the hospitals and the specialists will provide that care for zero. The dignity that could be afforded people for a nominal amount of money because it's going to fold out where they have no hope for primary care and it's going to change the calculist dramatically. This is really effecting us economically. And it is coming back to the bussines and individuals in costs that we have to pay for health care. We were so close, we did all of our homework, we had put out a request information, had only one provider that was interested we were that close to sitting down to sending out invitations to negotiate. And start this program. We were ready to do it. CHSI is the private sector. Bernie and I were at a meeting the other day where it was mentioned that there is a subsidized health care for health insurance that is out there. Is that something we've looked into? It came in from — something at the state , a pooling thing where small companies can merge together and qualify for - the Alliance Bill 16J 2 There was a bill that was passed that wanted to bring employee groups together to buy insurance and it fell flat on it's face. I haven't heard of any groups that have persued it. have not seen it with the Chamber. If you only have two or three employees you can't even get group insurance at a decent company. We couldn't do it because we're all different tax numbers. For the smaller employer, they could band together and reduce the insurance premium rates to make it possible to cover their employees. What's scary enough there's been broaden through Florida dealing with this union that's been selling this group plans and so called ariso plans and they've really been screwing the lives of individuals. Local 69. Yep, exactly, so we don't want to go there. Looks like we'll have to save this for the next meeting so I can get the information about the occupational licenses. I think also with the social services assessment that Florida Gulfcoast is doing for us, we're going to come up with an anology for health care. There's going to be needs. There's always needs out there. The botton line is where are we going to get the money from. That's going to be the big questions. Where is the money coming from to these things to meet these needs. So, I think we're in the same boat with the health care. I don't think we need to prove the needs. The other committee spend two and a half years proving that. I agree, we don't need to rehash that. So, would we like to put on the agenda, Nancy for the agenda that we have a kind of a open discussion on considerations of where we potentially feel the dollars could come from. Whatever we do, we need to wrap it up by June. We only have 7 months, so if we don't come up with some suggestions in January or February, we might as well not put anything on the tapes. So, I'd like to see it, if it's ok with you all to have that as part of the discussion. Maybe the survey that we'll have will also show those services that we need to talk about and just make funding sort of a critical discussion at the next meeting. Let's look at other ways, let's see if we can get the occupational license information and maybe what we need to do is bring in some additional questions like can we generate these kind of dollars. Would Dwight Brock be able to provide any good input? Jim Coletta - On that part, I don't think so, I think if anything we could have Abe Skinner here. Although I got a fairly good definition of how it all comes together. It would be great if you had him here in person. No, I'm sorry, not abe, it would be Guy Carlton. And Guy was supportive of this from the beginning, we didn't think it could be done, and 16J 2 we found it could be. So, possibly we could see if there's some interest in that and an appropriate way to give rebates for people who can prove they do have health insurance. That extra portion you're charging, so you don't have to penalize those people who are doing it right. You're not talking about a large sume of money. It's a small amount of money that you would have to put together to provide the quality of services. That's one thing we need to take a look at. Local groups are raising millions all the time. What we have to do is make sure people understand what it's all about. There are misconceptions out there. One last point, this community subsidizes health care to the tune of millions and millions of dollars a year. Maybe we sould raise a couple of fees for people who ride in the ambulance and transfer them. Seven million dollars is what we subsidize. That doesn't include the helicopter`? That's the overall expense. That's a lot of money. So do you think Guy should be here? Yes, because he was quoted a while ago about the increasing occupational license fees and there was a huge cry that came out about that. There's been some research that shows it can be done. I think we ought to take a look at how much your increase is going to be. If we're talking about it doubling from $50 to $100, that's not good, but if we're talking $50 to $55 and finding other ways to fund the difference, I think we got something that's workable and saleble to that business community. People are more than willing to pay for something if others are helping pay for it also. Not just on their shoulders. Right The other thing is that we identified, find out who the right person is in the county that can tell you the details of how frequently you're allowed to adjust those rates, because I think it's a 5 or 10 year intervals that you allowed to adjust them. You need to know what dedication of the occupational license. It may have already be dedicated to two or three different areas. Maybe Mike Smykowski could answer that and we could invite him. 16J 2 I would even suggest that we invite Dawn Jantz from the Chamber of Commerce to sit in on this. Jeff Lytle was a supporter of this particular notion, not that I think him being here would be appropriate, he might be very uncomfortable. Maybe a representative. Not necessarily a state representative. We sent him copies and he either knows something that the rest of us don't or he just didn't listen. That gets us back to the one of the questions, and that is "Do people who live in poverty deserve health care ?" Everyone says the do. That gets us back to "Where does the dough come from ?" So, does everyone agree, we'll probably put that off and it may be a full meeting to look at the other recommendations and get on with it. We're going to have to take two or three problems to the end of the year and say this is what we need to do, because that study probably lists 5 or 6 or 7 different. It focuses on 5 areas outside the realm of health care. So, we're talking potentially 6 areas and approximately 7 months to get it done. It may be too big a task, but we might be able to take on 3 or 4 and get them done and completed. If we can complete one and do it well, it may be a stepping stone for the others. Are we off the track to attempt to preserve the monies that are on reserve for this project and plan. They're still reserved until, but there has to be a public outcry to spend all that money before it actually happens. There isn't a tremendous amount of support to take it and throw it in there. It's going to have to make a lot of sense to do it. It's held in suspended animation. If I had to take a vote on it tomorrow, I don't think it would stay there. I'm thinking we need to go back to see if we can't get the commission to approve that again. Seven hundred thousand could be implemented in the next fiscal budget. I think we should have a discussion versis that, because I think we ought to look at other funds and tie it together to have a little more impact. If we don't have some other ideas and support from other people, I don't think we're ever going to get that seven hundred thousand out of limbo. They're not going to make a decision to do this if public perception is they don't want it. We need to come up with other alternatives. I honestly think if we do it the right way, we'll have the $700,000 plus another $700,000. So we'll have a million four, so I think we need to do that. Agreed? 16J 2 � Agreed. We got time for public comment. We don't have a forum, so we'll save the minutes for the next meeting. Does anyone have trouble with the dates that are proposed for the next meetings? Third Thursday of the month? Say it once, say it twice, it's all set. Does anyone want to make public comment. Yes, Commissioner Coletta probably is the only that knows about the survey Grant Rolpy does annually every year and has been doing it for many many years. This year a new question was added. The league of women voters makes phone calls to total of 315 randomly selective registered voters from various zip codes. The question was, "Do you think that County Government has a role in insuring health care for those that can't afford it ?" 58% said yes. Which I think is a perception that needs to be spread around a little bit more. The other part of that survey was "What problems do you see that the county can address ?" And of course the first one was growth and the second one was health care. That's reinforcement for what you're doing. Ruth, you have public comment too? Just a couple of things I wanted to say, one of the things you were talking about is small businesses grouping together. It was called SHIPPA it was a fraud. Something else I wanted to bring up, I was all for this plan until I heard you were thinking about covering people who were not wanted. I have, and I'm sure there are other conditions that people work have, because of their immediate crisis in health care, cannot work. And, are turned away from neighborhood health clinics because they're not working. Therefore, they have no benefits here. And I was really hoping that this program would take care of these people in the short term because I got them patched up and you're talking they have to be working. No, there was a technical exception that allowed for that exact thing. Because one of the things that you were talking about and one of your questions was "How many of these people are going to be staying in the program . My organization works with people and my goal is to them out of my system, because if they graduate out of my job problems, because if they don't I'm doing something wrong or something is not working right. The other thing I want to bring up is you're looking at taxes your looking seeing how we're going to do this, we're going to tax, tax and tax. This is not a community that likes taxes. This is not a state that likes taxes. Your looking with United Way, etc., have we tried to look at other creative ways. Because we're only talking a million. Could we not 16J 2 get people to chip in. I buy flood insurance every year. I know I'm not going to get flooded. People could chip into an endowment fund saying, look if I ever get down and out at least I have someplace to go for medical care. How much would we need to have in an endowment fund to raise half or' /4 of the amount. Because if you look at taxes, oh my God, an endowment at least we Figure approximately 5% a year in return from an endowment over a period of years. So if you need $600,000 it would be 30 million. It would take some time to build it up. They said that they were looking at other funding sources, not just occupational license increases, we have to look at the total picture. What I'm talking about is the non profit way is we could rob Peter to pay Paul kind of thing. And I would like you to look more at the non profit way of doing things as opposed to taxing. I don't have any problems with that, I think we need to look at all aspects. We're not going to limit it to taxing and government funding. I don't think we should do that. I share your concerns about the grants. I think we should be getting every dime of grant money that is possible, but if we're looking to grants to save us on this, forget it. I appreciate your comments, they're very good. When I talked about a minor modification and a grant concept, I'm not talking about a grant to fund it, what I'm talking about is using the county tax dollars in the form of a grant to do this. In that example if in fact it happens and clinic was set up, it would take care of working and non working, it would all be done on a sliding curve. Other comments were solicited from the public and board. None were given. Meeting was adjourned. (jeb J 2 Count - Health Department Cnring...Cnnomued AelpmK. Dedrmred To the Wellness of(ha ('mm..romn DATE: TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM December 6, 2001 Ernie Bretzmann Jim Coletta George Drobinski Fielding Epstein Edward T. Ferguson Petra M. Jones Dr. William P. Lascheid Susan Luenberger Edward Morton Tina Marie Osceloa Joe Paterno Mark Rhein Dr. Keith Riley Wayne Sakamoto Dee Whinnery FROM: Joan M. Colfer, M.D., M.P.H. Director SUBJECT: Health & Human Services Committee INFORMATION ONLY Enclosed are materials regarding county contributions and health care for your review. Should you have any questions, feel free to call Barry Williams at 774 -8154 or me at 530 -5332. The items are listed below: 1) Public Health Budget 2) Social Services 3) Services for Seniors 4) Veterans Services 5) EMS 6) Housing and Urban Improvement 7) David Lawrence Mental Health Center 8) Resolution Establishing Committee 9) Collier County Health Department Services Brochure 10) Collier County Health Department Annual Report 11) Collier County Health Care Review Committee Final Report 12) Primary Care Program for the Uninsured JMC /mk Cc: Barry Williams Leo Ochs Tom Schneider Anne Campbell Myra Shapiro Public Health Department 16J 2 General Fund (001) Goals: Protect and promote good health for all in Collier County within a partnership between State of Florida Department of Health and Collier County Board of County Commissioners. % of % of Total Programs: FTE's Personnel FY 02 Cost Dollars General Operating & Administrative Costs 0.0 0.0% $240,300 26.8% Base Level: 1.0 0.7% $36,876 4.1% Communicable Disease Control: 119.7 83.6% $895,200 100.0% Programs funded by County: Immunization 10.6 7.3% $216,577 24.20/6 Sexually Transmitted Disease 6.0 4.2% $51,724 5.8% AIDS 15.5 10.8% $13,692 1.5% Tuberculosis 12.3 8.6% $73,025 8.2% Communicable Disease 6.4 4.5% $129,928 14.5% Programs not funded by County 2.4 1.7% $0 0.00/0 Subtotal 53.2 37.1% $484,946 54.2% Personal Health (Primary Care): Programs funded by County: School Health 7.8 5.5% $69,965 7.8% Adult Health 3.0 2.1% $63,113 7.1% Programs not funded by County 54.7 38.2% $0 0.0% Subtotal 65.5 45.8% $133,078 _ 14.9% Environmental Health & Engineering: Water Quality Testing Program Onsite Sewage Treatment and Disposal Program Arbovirus Sentinel Surveillance Program 0.0 0.5 0.5 0.0% 0.3% 0.4% $6,000 $6,709 $24.167 0.7% 0.7% 2.7% Subtotal 1.0 0.7% $36,876 4.1% Total General Revenue Funding 119.7 83.6% $895,200 100.0% Environmental Health & Engineering; Fees Only (No County General Revenue): Swimming Pool 6.7 4.6% $242,928 N/A Migrant Labor 2.5 1.8% $0 N/A Other Programs not funded by County 14.3 10.0% $104 N/A Total Fees Only (No County General Revenue) 23.5 16.4% $243,032 N/A Subtotal Expanded Services: 143.2 Primary Health Care: 10.5 Includes programs for dental services for 400 adults, routine preventative health care and ongoing care for chronic conditions of 927 children, prenatal care to 900 pregnant women, health services to 5'6;699 7 O d O children in attendance at Collier County Public ") Schools, and primary care services for approximately 2,000 uninsured County residents 100.0% $895,200 100.0% 7.3% $1,333,900 149.0% Grand Total 153.7 1073% $2,229,100 249.0% Public Health Department (Cont.) 1 J General Fund (001) Performance Measures Actual FY 00 Forecast FY 01 Budget FY 02 Immunizations to children, birth to 18, and flu vaccine given to adults 21,006 30,700 31,000 % of Children in childcare centers, birth to 36 months, with up -to -date immunizations 92.1% 92.1% 94.0% Total number of vision, hearing, scoliosis and growth & development screens performed 25,872 36,645 38,514 % completed referrals for positive vision and scoliosis screens 62.0% 67.0% 1 68.0% 16J Z Public Health Department (Cont.) General Fund (001) Current FY 01 /02 - Operating expenses decreased due to a reduction of $10,100 in general insurance. Expanded FY 01102 - The $1,333,900 in expanded service for primary health care will provide dental services for 400 adults, routine preventative health care and ongoing care of chronic conditions for 927 children, prenatal care for 900 pregnant women, health services to 56,000 children in attendance at Collier County Public Schools, and primary care services for approximately 2,000 uninsured County residents. FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 County Actual Adopted Forecast Q rat E:VM detl Total Budget AppupriationUnit E*Rev Budget E*Rev Service Service Budget Change $0 $0 $240,300 Communicable Disease BCC Paid Opezating Exp. 246,108 250,600 248,500 240,300 0 240,300 4.1% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Uotributiaos 603,396 654,900 654,900 654,900 1,333,900 1,988,800 203.70% Renit -Other Godt. 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Apprupriatiom 849,504 905,500 903,400 895,200 1,333,900 2,229,100 146.2% Less: Revewes 57 0 0 0 0 0 NA Net Cost Gen. Rev 849,447 905,500 903,400 895,200 1,333,900 2,229,100 146.2% Current FY 01 /02 - Operating expenses decreased due to a reduction of $10,100 in general insurance. Expanded FY 01102 - The $1,333,900 in expanded service for primary health care will provide dental services for 400 adults, routine preventative health care and ongoing care of chronic conditions for 927 children, prenatal care for 900 pregnant women, health services to 56,000 children in attendance at Collier County Public Schools, and primary care services for approximately 2,000 uninsured County residents. Collier County Public Health Deuartment Programs Summary of Current Service Funding Sources County State Fees and General Revenue General Revenue Other Revenue Program Funded Funded Funded Total General Operations $240,300 $0 $0 $240,300 Communicable Disease Control $484,946 $1,751,237 $690,397 $2,926,580 Personal Health (Primary Care) $133,078 $2,818,493 $369,468 $3,321,039 Environmental Health and Engineering $36,876 $355,164 $675,378 $1,067,418 Total $895,200 $4,924,894 $1,735,243 $7,555,337 Note: The County's General Fund contribution of $895,200 is 11.8 % of the total funding in FY 02 compared to $905,500, or 12.1 %, in FY 01. Social Services General Fund (001) Goals: /Y2/" 16J 2 -- dxl' 1Y a�� To provide social services assistance to eligible indigent residents of Collier County as required by Florida Statute 125.01. Services provided are either State mandated or emergency /short-term medical or general assistance; giving maximum service to meet the minimum needs required for health and decency, according to available funding and Board of County Commissioners' policy and philosophy. Proerarms: Base Level Medicaid County Billing for In- patient Hospitalization and Nursing Home Care [F.S. 409.267], Indigent Burials [F.S. 245.06], Abused Children - Medical Exams [F.S. 415.407(4)], and Out of County Hospital Care (HCRA) [F.S. 154.308]. Emergency Medical or General Assistance The County serves as a safety net and is the agency of last resort for the provision of emergency, short-term medical assistance to poverty level, uninsured, county residents. If these services were no longer available, the results would most probably be prolonged disabilities and minor medical problems escalating into catastrophic, even life threatening situations that could require more costly medical intervention. % of FTE's Personnel 3.25 56.5% 2.50 43.5% % of Total FY 02 Cost Dollars $1,749,300 49.1% $1,813,400 50.9% Grand Total 5.75 100.0% $3,562,700 100.0% tr — _r `---' ye- 1v oN�e'r-A Performance Measures Actual FY 00 Forecast FY 01 Budget FY 02 Total Client Contacts 26,500 27,200 29,400 % of Clients Receiving County Assistance 50% 52% 50% of Clients Referred to Other Agencies 50% 48% 48% 16J 2 Social Services (Cont.) General Fund (001) Forecast FY 00 /01 - Forecast personal services reflects severance pay and benefits for the retiring Director. Operating expenses are $171,900 less than budgeted due to the following decreases: $13,800 in other professional fees, $50,000 for Medicaid hospitals, $132,500 for Medicaid nursing home, $10,000 for indigent burials and $35,000 for abused/sheltered children. Additionally, a reduction in Health Care Responsibility funds of $65,000 is projected because the number of patients actually serviced is not as large as was anticipated based upon the expanded program eligibility requirements. These decreases are partially offset by the following increases: $25,000 for physician fees, $96,300 for hospital outpatient fees, $10,000 for medicine and drugs, and $4,000 for personal care items. The $2,000 budgeted in capital outlay was for the replacement of a printer which will not be purchased. Current FY 01/02 —There is an additional $143,000 budgeted in operating expenses because the County's mandated share of cost for Medicaid hospitalization increased due to a recent statutory change in State legislation, which is effective July 1, 2001. FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 Actual Adopted Forecast 0amug Funded Total Budget Appropriation Unit Eqd ev Budget ExpTRev Service Service &fidget ChaW Petsanal Services 283,137 313,500 348,100 344,200 0 344,200 9.8% Operating Expenses 2 ,830,357 2,992,200 2,820,300 3,218,500 0 3218,500 7.6% C*W OJ&Y 0 2,000 0 0 0 0- 100.(1 /p Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA Total Appropriations 3,113,494 3,301,700 3,168,400 3,562,700 0 3,562,70X0 7.7% Less: Revers 201 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Net Cost Gen Rev 3,113,293 3,307,700 3,168,40) 3,562,700 0 3,562,700 7.7% Permanent Full Time Positions 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.8 0.0 5.8 0.0/10 Forecast FY 00 /01 - Forecast personal services reflects severance pay and benefits for the retiring Director. Operating expenses are $171,900 less than budgeted due to the following decreases: $13,800 in other professional fees, $50,000 for Medicaid hospitals, $132,500 for Medicaid nursing home, $10,000 for indigent burials and $35,000 for abused/sheltered children. Additionally, a reduction in Health Care Responsibility funds of $65,000 is projected because the number of patients actually serviced is not as large as was anticipated based upon the expanded program eligibility requirements. These decreases are partially offset by the following increases: $25,000 for physician fees, $96,300 for hospital outpatient fees, $10,000 for medicine and drugs, and $4,000 for personal care items. The $2,000 budgeted in capital outlay was for the replacement of a printer which will not be purchased. Current FY 01/02 —There is an additional $143,000 budgeted in operating expenses because the County's mandated share of cost for Medicaid hospitalization increased due to a recent statutory change in State legislation, which is effective July 1, 2001. Social Services /Services for Seniors Fund (123) 2,4 Goal: To assist those frail, elderly Collier County residents in greatest medical, economic and social need to remain in their homes as long as possible and to improve or maintain their quality of life by preventing premature institutionalization. Proarams• Community Care for the Elderly Grant Older Americans' Act - Title III-B. III -C1, III -C2 Subtotal Other Grant Progrrams (No County Match Required Medicaid Waiver ** Grand Total % of * $42,000 22.5% 8.3 100.0% $152,000 100.0% *The 8.3 FTE positions have more than three funding sources [i.e. staff works on multiple grant programs.] **The total "cost" amount is totally reimbursed by the State; therefore, requiring no County matching funds. While it does not show as part of the County budget, the Services for Seniors staff has the "spending authority," or oversight responsibility, for $1,351,181 in Federal and State funds for all services. Performance Measures % of Forecast FY 01 Total FTE's Personnel FY 02 Cost ** Dollars 8.3 100.0% $64,900 42.7% * $45,100 29.7% 8.3 100.0% $110,000 72.9% * $42,000 22.5% 8.3 100.0% $152,000 100.0% *The 8.3 FTE positions have more than three funding sources [i.e. staff works on multiple grant programs.] **The total "cost" amount is totally reimbursed by the State; therefore, requiring no County matching funds. While it does not show as part of the County budget, the Services for Seniors staff has the "spending authority," or oversight responsibility, for $1,351,181 in Federal and State funds for all services. Performance Measures Actual FY 00 Forecast FY 01 Budget FY 02 No. of Clients Served 809 816 832 No. of Service Units Provided 121,843 136,420 139,148 Social Services /Services for Seniors (Cont.) Fund (123) 16J 2 Grants (Reauirine a County Match): Community Care for the Elderly Older American's Act: Title III B (OAA III -B) Title III C (OAA III -C) TOTAL Grants (Not Reauirine a Countv Match): Medicaid Waiver (Reimbursement) Homemaking Administration (Rollover Funds) Alzheimer's Disease Initiative - ADI Home Care for the Elderly (HCE) FISCAL YEAR 2002 Federal State County Grant Grant Match" Other Total 0 235,000 64,900 0 299,900 123,000 0 40,300 0 163,300 48,000 0 4,800 0 52,800 $171,000 $235,000 $110,000 $0 $516,000 0 42,000 0 0 42,000 0 0 0 102,900 102,900 0 500 0 0 500 0 30,000 0 0 30,000 Grand Total $171,000 $307,500 $110,000 $102,900 $691,400 Forecast FY 00101 Expenses and Revenues - Both revenues and expenses increased due to a $10,000 increase in the Medicaid Waiver Grant which is fully reimbursed by the State. * The County Match is included for illustrative purposes to reflect what programs the $110,000 will be used for. FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 00 /01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 01 /02 % Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Appropriation Unit Exp /Rev Budget Exp /Rev Service Service Budget Change Personal Services 394,453 29,000 39,000 37,400 0 37,400 29.0% Operating Expenses 110,736 2,000 2,000 2,600 0 2,600 30.0% Capital Outlay 4,359 1,000 1,000 2,000 0 2,000 100.0% County Match 0 110,000 110,000 0 0 0 - 100.0% Total Appropriations 509,548 142,000 152,000 42,000 0 42,000 -70.4% Revenue: Medicaid Waivers 451,566 32,000 42,000 42,000 0 42,000 31.3% Contribution - GF 110,000 110,000 110,000 0 0 0 - 100.0% Total Revenue 561,566 142,000 152,000 42,000 0 42,000 -70.4% Permanent Full -Time Positions 7.6 7.6 7.8 7.8 0.0 7.8 2.6% Part-Time (FTE) Positions 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0% Grants (Reauirine a County Match): Community Care for the Elderly Older American's Act: Title III B (OAA III -B) Title III C (OAA III -C) TOTAL Grants (Not Reauirine a Countv Match): Medicaid Waiver (Reimbursement) Homemaking Administration (Rollover Funds) Alzheimer's Disease Initiative - ADI Home Care for the Elderly (HCE) FISCAL YEAR 2002 Federal State County Grant Grant Match" Other Total 0 235,000 64,900 0 299,900 123,000 0 40,300 0 163,300 48,000 0 4,800 0 52,800 $171,000 $235,000 $110,000 $0 $516,000 0 42,000 0 0 42,000 0 0 0 102,900 102,900 0 500 0 0 500 0 30,000 0 0 30,000 Grand Total $171,000 $307,500 $110,000 $102,900 $691,400 Forecast FY 00101 Expenses and Revenues - Both revenues and expenses increased due to a $10,000 increase in the Medicaid Waiver Grant which is fully reimbursed by the State. * The County Match is included for illustrative purposes to reflect what programs the $110,000 will be used for. 16J 2 m N IN N �O LL O � Of O^i d O t'q I; A O ... Q S I hY' I �tpO pOpppf � tp S n oj �yp� _ tpD� S N G -q S l O l p�pL q N N —r — I IN i� I II n m ao a� m r. ui� p SIN fD N I g to m v�" ai ,ai r'I vi. IDI of r t� IIpi fV d N fV tC TI r —d N M O O S N d F. A �p O W OI 1 � fD �, aO I Oi �1n N III ( fV N (t"p1 S C On1 ID] PI th IN I� } Q Cfl r �� t0 V fO d III I�1 0� I GOpp �I pp p - W ul M IX pp IOC tptpp��. nl r Ofl ONO �ONy itfO NJ IIg l tO ifl O Y O N f� {pNOj r > tN� N N N m N c4 t0 N ID IIg�Ny N op I �p 8 n �i �� O 9 pOp 100 IO rO oO pG O O OD d O1I S 18 IS �'f t0 d Y :m I' l I I lo IR of o O N g IS •• Op OoIO o S I g ID < O I�l1 N 33 I i I I N I O In N V Q tff pNp S d tD 10 ' 8j c Sys, y a o NI Ol O O O O O IN h Veterans Services General Fund (001) 16J 2 Goals: To assist all former and present members of the Armed Forces of the United States of America and their dependents in preparing claims for and securing all Federal, State and Local benefits to which they are entitled, as per the provisions of Title 38 United States Code, 38 Code of Federal Regulations and Florida State Statute. Proerams• FTE's Base Level N/A Minimal Services 3.0 Veteran Advocacy: To facilitate successful prosecution of clients' claims against the United States Department of Veterans Affairs as pertains to monetary and medical benefits. Also, represent clients on matters pertaining to the Department of Defense. Service delivery will be provided through personal interviews conducted at the department, Immokalee Satellite Office, hospitals, nursing homes, and private residences. Transportation System .5 Transport veterans needing medical care to Department of Veterans Medical facilities located at Bay Pines, Fort Myers, Miami, and Tampa. Grand Total 3.5 % of % of Total Personnel FY 02 Cost Dollars 85.7% $204,100 95.3% - 14.3% $10,100 4.7% 100.0% $214,200 100.0 Performance Measures Actual FY 00 Forecast FY 01 Budget FY 02 No. of Clients Served 2,504 2,100 2,200 Volunteer Hours 2,291 2,480 2,400 Clients Transported 607 825 800 Veterans Services (Cont.) General Fund (001) 16J 2 Forecast FY 00 /01— Personal services includes the payment of a retroactive salary adjustment dating back to June 1998. FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY OUO2 FY 01/02 % Actual Adopted Forecast Current Fxp nkd Tonal Budget Appropriation Unit Eqp Rev Budget B#Rev Service Service Budget Change Personal Services 142,508 151,500 164,600 187,800 0 187,800 24.0% Opetatmg Expenses 25,017 26,500 25,600 26,400 0 26,400 -0.4% Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA Total Appropriations 167,525 178,000 190,200 214,200 0 214,200 20.31% Less; Revmw 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Net Cast Gen. Rev 167,525 178,000 190,200 214,200 0 214,2W, 20.3% Penraneot Full -Trme Positions 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.0 3.0 0.0°/0/ Past Time (FIE) Positions 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.5 0.0% Forecast FY 00 /01— Personal services includes the payment of a retroactive salary adjustment dating back to June 1998. f "L7 it M.y .1.r 3 C M f W �W W i, �r f �i rr''a I� ill -r1 r 7 J) 2 � 3 c :.) n- U -o aU y b W c Cl 461 2 ICT b � co T o; �wA x ,,n x USA w fir.. �' � ✓; cr f 7 J) 2 � 3 c :.) n- U -o aU y b W c 461 2 b � o; �wA x USA w 7 J) 2 � 3 c :.) n- U -o aU y b W c z O U .�f ^J a w a O U C9 C w O U a w V i., V G� C!a . co� (U U :n bA A 'C3 cz O "6 U M 4- bA 0 G.i 0 0 w zw � U oz w M .d. aoza twi��pw 00 z as as 00 y � o cn bA v 00 Q u .� un 0 0 al . c O U W 'n Q as >, h Ct un cz . co� (U U :n bA A 'C3 cz O "6 U M 4- bA 0 G.i 0 0 w zw � U oz w M .d. aoza twi��pw 00 z as as 00 rl C■.) �3 N C Ji L U . c O U W 'n Q rl C■.) 16J 2 CD • • n � � CG r•. O � �+, �,.. � p r-+, � G. CND ��•t C� ('; L/� O ~ CD 0 � � p CD rD CIA �nll n f-� C� C ° fD CD r rD O <_ CD CD a Uo rD � O- O n CD O � (� O O 0 CD nD O O �� a' �� C ► h a rD CD CD n n CD 4• A� cv O � f D �•*� p � � ft CD CD — ^' CD UQ o CD r CfQ f� cr CD ;D a �: ° y o � ° g• � � .�' � �'' a CD CD cn rD a cra �. c � �. 0 CD c rD CD rD CD fD rD C?i c cr a cr a' cr �' �' 0 ?/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 01 16J 2 EMERGENCY SERVICES DIVISION Emergency Services Administration Emergency Medical Services achopee Fire Control District Medical Examiner Emergency Management Isles of Capri Fire Control District Past_K+ Fax Note 7671 Dose Pages IN, To From Co./Dopt Co. Phone # Phone a- SAS Fax # F -1 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 02 Emergency Services Division 16J 2 Tom Storrar, Admiubtrator The Emergency Services Division provides preventive and emergency response services designed to protect the health, safety and welfare of County residents and visitors. It includes Administration, Emergency Management, Helicopter Operations, Division of Forestry, Isles of Capri, Municipal Fire Rescue Services, Ochopee Fire Control, Collier County Fire Control, Goodland/Horr's Island Fire, Medical Examiner and Emergency Medical Services. Emergency Services utilizes a number of funding sources. Administration, Emergency Management, Helicopter Operations, Medical Examiner, and the Division of Forestry are funded by county -wide ad valorem taxes. Isles of Capri Municipal Fire and Rescue Services, Ochopee Fire Control, Collier County Fire Control and Goodland /Horr's Island Fire are funded primarily through ad valorem taxes generated from their respective taxing districts. The Emergency Medical Services Department is funded by a combination of ambulance fees and county -wide ad valorem taxes. The Emergency Services Division total operating budget for FY 02 is $17.8 trillion. The division currently has 185 permanent positions. Four (4) additional positions and $390,700 in expanded funding requests will enhance services for FY 02. Helicopter Operations will purchase fright vision goggles and training to ensure that search and other flights at night in rural areas can be performed safely and efficiently. Ochopee Fire Control District will be replacing two part-time fire-fighter positions with two full -time positions due to ,growth in the area. For the Emergency Medical Services Department, the following is included in their FY 01/02 budget: 1) A Warehouse Technician will be added to the staff to maintain the EMS supply system to over 20 ambulances and a helicopter on a continuous basis. 2) A Secretary will be hired to assist the EMS Administrative Director. 3) Document Imaging technology will be implemented to eliminate paper filing. 4) EMS will contribute to the Information Technology E- government Web Development project. 5) Health benefits will be given to part -time EMS personnel. For more information on programs within the Emergency Services Division, please contact the following: Division Administration 774 -8383 Emergency Management 774 -8444 Helicopter Operations 643 -5506 Isles of Capri Fire & Rescue 394 -9546 Ochopee Fire & Rescue 695 -4114 Collier County Fire Control 774 -8459 Medical Examiner 434-5020 Emergency Medical Services 774 -8459 F -2 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 03 Emergency Division 16J 2 rgeney Services D�vas>to (Cont.) (font.) Division Summary FY 99/00 FY 00/01 )~Y00 /01 FY 01 102 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 Actual Adopted Forecast Currcnt Expanded Total Budget Dcpartment/Approeri ations Ex ev B uditet Ex /Rev Service Service Budget Chan e Division Administration 143,271 162,800 160,300 184,600 0 0 Emergency Management 184,600 13.1% 257,217 221,800 325,400 259,400 35;800 295,200 33.1 °r'o Miscellaneous Grants 165,350 103,000 186,800 137,600 0 137,600 33.60/c, Piclicopter Operations 649,602 729,500 712,200 942,900 79,300 1,022,200 40.1% Division of Forestry Svcs. 12,398 16,500 12,400 12,400 0 12,400 -24.8% Isles of Capri Muni. Fire 230,223 320,300 308,300 340,500 0 340,500 6.3% Ochopce Fire Contml 828,969 1,065,000 1,027,700 1,202,700 23,700 1,226,400 15.2% Collier- County Fire Control 330,361 298,200 294,500 298,500 0 298,500 0 "1% Goodland /1•fores Island Fire 58,161 60,300 59,500 59,800 0 59,800 -0,8% Lrnergcncy Medical Svcs, 10,214,027 11,694,800 11,420,100 13,120,800 251,900 13,372,700 1.3% (-,MS Trust 88,794 72,200 1.64,200 54,700 0 54,700 - 24,20/. First Responder Training 63,228 73,600 27,100 75.000 p 0 Medical Examiner 75,000 1.9 /a 674,533 689,400 6$9,400 715.200 0 715,200 3.7% 'Total Div. Appropriotions 13,716,134 15,507,400 15,387,900 17,404,100 390,700 17,794,800 14.8% t'undin Scwrccs General Fund 8,932,560 9,736,800 9,814,000 10,003,900 367,000 10,370,900 6.5% MSTD General 12,398 16,500 12,400 12,400 0 ether Ad Valorem U 12,400 -24.8 /o 861,206 950,300 907,900 1,082,900 0 1,082,900 14.0% Pces & Charges 4,005,722 3,546,400 3,802,500 4,206,700 0 4,206,700 18.6% ! edoritl I'It., "I' 243,400 290,400 290,400 325,900 23,700 349,600 20.4% Grants 242,634 191,000 365,900 203,000 0 203,000 6.3% Reimhurscments/Refunds 132,731 50,300 50,300 0 0 0 - 100.0% TranslcrV Loan Proceeds 213,792 I37,000 145,300 138,300 0 0 Interest/Misc• 235,044 30,500 91,000 66,800 138,300 0.9% Carry Forward 282,800 802,000 1,250,500 1,642,300 0 66,800 119 "00 /a Revenue Reserve 0 1,642,300 104.8% % 0 (243,800) 0 (278,100) 0 (278,100) 14.1% Total Funding Snultes 15,162,287 15,507,400 16,730,200 17,404,100 390,700 17,794,800 14.8% Permanent Pusitiuns Division Administration Emergency Management MisccHatncous Grants 1101icopter Operations Isles of Capri Muni. Fire Ochopec Fire Control Emergency Medical Svcs. Total positions 2.0 2.0 2.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 4.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 147.0 159.0 159.0 172.00 185.00 185.00 F -3 2.0 0.0 2.0 0 -0% 3.0 0.5 3.5 163% 0.5 0.0 0.5 -50.0% 4,0 1.0 5.0 25.0% 4 -0 0.0 4.0 0.00/0 12.0 1.0 13.0 8.3% 159.0 2.0 161.0 13% 184.50 4.50 189.00 2.2% 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 04 16J 2 F -4 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 05 Emergency Services Administration %6J General Fund (001) Goals To provide executive level management and administrative support to all departments within the Emergency Services Division. Personal Services Operating rxpcnscs Capital outlay Total Appropriations Less: Revenues Net Cost Genl Fund Permanent Positions FY 99/00 FY 00/01 % of Pro rants: % of 1♦TE,s erson el Fy 02 Cos Total ollars Ad inistra ion To provide strategic and operational planning, 2.0 100.0 ° /a $184,600 100.0% budgeting and financial management, operating Current Expanded results and accountability, staff and policy Budget Ex v 60,849 development, and administrative and technical E ev 140,800 Service support to the BCC, County Administrator, Budget Change Constitutional Agencies and Advisory Boards. 17,100 18,000 Grand Total 2.0 � 100.0 /o $184,600 100.0% Personal Services Operating rxpcnscs Capital outlay Total Appropriations Less: Revenues Net Cost Genl Fund Permanent Positions FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 00/01 1_Y 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Ex v 60,849 Budget 145,700 E ev 140,800 Service Service Budget Change 16,35I 17,100 18,000 155,900 27,000 0 155,900 7.0% 66,071 0 1,500 1,700 0 0 27,000 57.9% 1,700 NIA 143,271 162,800 160,300 184,600 0 114% 184,600 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 143,271 162,800 160,300 184,600 0 184,600 13.4% 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 2.0 0.0% Current FY 01102 -- Operating expenses are increasing $9,000 due to travel expenses/professional development at $1,500, insurance at $1,800 two file cabinets at $1,000, an on -line Hurricane Tracking System at $1,400, an additional cell phone at $300, printer, modems, memory and data cards for a hand held "Palm Pilot" and G.P.S. units at $800, Hurricane Tracking Software at $700, and on -line tropical weather service at $600. Capital outlay consists of $11700 for a replacement copier F -5 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 06 Emergency Management 16J 2 General Fund (001) Goals: To make every reasonable effort to insure the public safety and welfare of people and property from the detrimental effects of natural and technological disasters. % of % of Total Programs•'_s Personnel iF .,� X 02 C t liars ase Level 2.0 66.7% $176,000 66.7% Chapter 252, Florida Statutes requires that counties provide a designated emergency management specialist trained and dedicated to provide emergency management services_ These services include management of the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan, including Recovery, Mitigation, and Terrorism activities, assistance and plan review of all Assisted Living facilities, nursing home and health care facilities, maintain the "People with Special Needs" registry including notification, and coordinating transportation and patient care; identifying and cataloguing critical facilities and maintaining readiness of the Emergency Operations Center. Eme' enc�Onerations 1.0 33.3% $83,400 33.31/10 Includes maintaining a back -up emergency operations center and mobile command vehicle that can provide on -scene support to Incident Commander, maintain supplies and equipment trailers for deployment, project management for school sheltering projects, maintains Inclement Weather Sheltering Program, provides support for the National Flood Insurance CRS program, coordinates and reviews DRUPUD mitigation activities in cogjunction with developers, County staff and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Committee. Maintains Emergency Management web page and disseminates emergency public safety statements to subscribers. Subtotal 3.0 100.0% o $259,400 100./o 0 Exnanded�SerylCe�: Transfer of .5 f TE (Emergency Management Coordinator) from the Miscellaneous Grants Fund 0.5 16.7% 16.7/0 $35,800 14.3% Grand Total 3.5 116.7% $295,200 114.3% •.•... vv of Disaster Prep. Seminars and More r��ocas r x ul Mud get FY 02 1 I 1 Average Time Spent Per Seminar (hours) 1 5 110 110 # of Health Care Plans Reviewed 1.5 I.5 47 Average Time Spent Per Plan (hours) 78 65 3.0 # of Critical Facilities Surveyed 3 0 3.0 Avers a Time S ent Per Facili hours 262 2.5 235 300 1 2.5 _ 2.5 F -6 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 07 Emergency Management (Cont.) IbJ 2 General Fund (001) Forecast FY 00/01 - Forecast reflects special pay adjustments for the Emergency Management staff. Forecast Operating expenses include $79,400 representing final cost reimbursements to fires at Merritt Boulevard. entities that participated in fighting Revenue FY 01/02 - The source of Emergency Management revenue is a State and Local Emergency Management Assistance Grant. Expanded FY 01/02 - There is $35,800 budgeted for the transfer of .5 FTE (Emergency Management Coordinator position) from the Miscellaneous Grant Fund to the General Fund as only 50% of this position is actually devoted to grant administration. This would also allow for increased workload in Sheltering Project Management, Health Care Planning, Exercise Development and Anti- Terrorism Planning. Personal services are $31,700, and associated operating expenses are $4,100. F -7 FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 o/0 A��priation Unit Actual Adopted Fotcast Uurent Expanded Total BudW Personal services Opetating Expenses 169,362 & 175,300 �P�v 18700 Service 213,900 Service 31,700 Budget Chanw 7A5,600 401 % Capital Outlay 87,855 46,500 124,200 45,500 4,100 49,600 6.7% 0 0 13,900 0 0 0 N/A Total Appropriations Less: Revenue 257,217 221,800 325,400 259,400 35,800 295,200 33.1% 54,945 38,000 38,400 38,000 0 38,000 0.0% Net Cost Gen'i Fund 202,272 183,$00 287,000 221,400 35,800 257,200 39.91% f'eMItnent Positions 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 0.5 3.S 16.7% Forecast FY 00/01 - Forecast reflects special pay adjustments for the Emergency Management staff. Forecast Operating expenses include $79,400 representing final cost reimbursements to fires at Merritt Boulevard. entities that participated in fighting Revenue FY 01/02 - The source of Emergency Management revenue is a State and Local Emergency Management Assistance Grant. Expanded FY 01/02 - There is $35,800 budgeted for the transfer of .5 FTE (Emergency Management Coordinator position) from the Miscellaneous Grant Fund to the General Fund as only 50% of this position is actually devoted to grant administration. This would also allow for increased workload in Sheltering Project Management, Health Care Planning, Exercise Development and Anti- Terrorism Planning. Personal services are $31,700, and associated operating expenses are $4,100. F -7 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 08 .Emergency Services Miscellaneous Grants Fund (I IS) Goa 16J 2 To provide enhancements to the Emergency Management program with grants from public and private sources to the maximum extent possible. Grants for this fund come from the Emergency Management preparedness and Enhancement Trust Fund and a Hazardous Material Grant. % of Programs % of Total Lr' Personnel EX2 Cost Dollars The Eme aencv Manaueme t Preparedness 0.5 100.0% $137,600 IOOA% Enh ncement Grant Provides for the maintenance and application of grants and purchase of disaster preparedness supplies and programs as well as the establisiunent of mitigation pleasures for public facilities. Coordinate Community Emergency Response Teams (CERT) activities. Maintains the Collier Emergency Response Volunteer (CERV) program. Maintains the Ingestion Pathway program in the event of nuclear accidents. Manages the Volunteer and Donations program. Provides a funding source for a Volunteer and Donations Coordinator. Coordinates and administers a county -wide disaster training program for first responders. Develops and participates in exercises generated by local, state and federal agencies. Grand Total 0.5 100.0% $137,600 1100.0% Performance Measures # of CERT Training Courses Actual FY 00 Forecast FY 01 Bud et IE: X 02 Average Time Spent Per Course (hours) 9 # of Nuclear Power Plant Drills 7 7 7 Average Time Spent per Drill (hours) ' 16 3 3 # of Radiological Survey Sets Tested 16 16 Average Time Spent Per Set (hours) 75 75 75 # of Hazmat Site Visits 0.5 0•5 0.5 Aver T2 a Time Spent Per Site (hours) 63 8 0 60 0 g F-8 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 09 Emergency Services Coat, 16J Miscellaneous Grants Fund (X 18) Total Appropriations Revenue: Enterg Mgmt Grant Forestry Grant Other Grants Trnnsli rs Carry for%v trd Werest/M i sc. Total Revcnue 16-,350 FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 00 /01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 93,106 Appropriation Unit Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget limerg Mgmt Grant Exp /Rev Budget Exp /Rev Service Service Budget Chan e g For<stry Grant 93,104 103,000 117,700 124,800 0 124,800 21.2% Othcr Grants 3,276 0 4,800 0 0 0 N/A Remittances 53,970 0 64,300 12,800 0 12,800 N/A N/A 15,000 p 0 0 0 0 N /A, Total Appropriations Revenue: Enterg Mgmt Grant Forestry Grant Other Grants Trnnsli rs Carry for%v trd Werest/M i sc. Total Revcnue 16-,350 103,000 196,800 7 37,600 0 137,600 33.6% 93,106 103,000 103,100 103,000 0 103,000 0.0% 3,276 0 2,400 0 0 0 N/A 91,307 0 0 67,900 12,000 0 12,000 N/A 0 2,400 0 0 0 NIA 8,800 0 33,600 22,600 0 22,600 N/A 1,605 0 0 0 0 0 N/A 198,094 103,000 209,400 137,600 0 137,600 33.6% FTE's 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.0 0.5 - 50.0°/6 Forecast FY 00 /01 - The Emergency Management Preparedness Enhancement Grant is made available for shelter hardening, disaster aid center development and hardening of facilities at community centers, full -time help development, and public awareness program A Division of rorestry Grant will be received in the amount of $2,400 which will be matched by a transfer from Control District's Fund (146). Available funds will be used to purchase a portable water pump. Ochopee Fire A Department of Community Development Hazard Mitigation Grant in the amount of $9,900 was received for provision of wind protection for several entranceways at Gulf Coast High School. A Department of Community .Development Grant in the amount of $7,400 was received for the purchase and installation of hurricane shutters for a shelter_ Other grants received include $3,300 for the Hazardous Material Response Plan Grant which provides for site visits, data collection and input for all public and private facilities in Collier County that maintain extremely hazardous substances above the threshold planning quantities as defined by the United States Environmental Protection Agency. Lastly, a grant in the amount of $47,300 was received to fund the purchase and installation of a radio transmitter. This provides the capability to broadcast critical weather information to the residents of Collier County. Current FY 01/02 - The Emergency Management Preparedness Enhancement Grant is budgeted for $103,000. The Hazardous Material Response Plan Grant is budgeted for $12,000. Nalf of the funding for the Emergency Management Coordinator will now be charged to the General Fund as only 50% of this Position's duties involve grant administration. The additional grant funds now available as a result of this transfer will be used for additional projects such as the installation of flip signs that can be quickly converted (flipped) to give emergency directions in times of disaster. F -9 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 Helicopter Operations General Fund (001) PAGE 10 16,1 2 Goals: To provide helicopter air support to both emergency and non- emergency governmental agencies in Collier County. % of Pr of Total ograms: TE's a sonne F 02 Cost DoE airs i er enc elico ter Air A bulanee 4.0 100.00/0 $735,600 77.6% Provide emergency helicopter ALS air ambulance support 24 hours a day, 7 days a week within Collier County. Provide emergency support to neighboring counties in accordance with established mutual aid agreements, Provide emergency inter- facility transfers. Attend flight training to meet FAA pilot currency and evaluation compliance standards and aircraft mandated maintenance in accordance with FAA regulations. l4elico er En i e Overhaul 0.0 0 -0% $180,000 19.4% Maintain a reserve fund for engine overhaul. Inter - facility Patient Transfers 0.0 0.0% $21,000 2.3% Provide patient transfer flights from Naples Community and North Collier Hospitals to more advanced hospitals and treatment centers throughout Florida. do k' ativc 1' hts 0.0 0.0% $6,300 0.7% Provide helicopter administrative support to County agencies to gain access to areas of the County which are very difficult or time consuming to access by ground. Subtotal 4.0 100.0% $942,900 100.0% Ex anded Services: Helicopter Pilot — Part time (30 hours) 1.0 1 -0 25.0 /o $44,$00 4.4% Night Vision Goggles and Training 0.0 0 0.0 /o $34,500 3.7% Grand Total 5,0 0 125.0 /o $1,022,200 108.1% -• •�• • ■.a• ■�� 1•iCa3iur" Total Helicopter Flights Actual FY 00 Forecast t )FY 02 Total Medical Flights 1,019 1,200 Total Flight Hours 914 798% 1,100 Respond to Daytime Emergency Calls within 3 491 600 minutes Respond to Nighttime Emergency Calls within 6 minutes 98 /0 98% Res nd to Inter- facili Calls within 20 minutes 100/0 100% 100% 100 /o . 100% 1 nnoi F -10 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 11 Operations (Cont.) 161 Helicopter O F � ( oat.) General Fund (001) Forecast FY 00 /01 - Operating expenses reflect an additional $9,600 for fuel. Capital outlay has increased $11,500 (approved in a budget amendment) for painting the helicopter hangar floor. Current FY 01 /02 - Personal services will increase $93,800 based on increases for the pilots approved in the Union Contract. Operating expenses are increasing over the FY 01 adopted budget due to additional fuel costs in the amount of $14,600, insurance at $2,300, and $1,900 for uniforms required in the bargaining contract. There is $180,000 budgeted for the engine overhaul reserve. This amount is based on a four -year schedule for overhaul of two engines at $360,000. Expanded IFY 01/02 - There is $34,500 budgeted to purchase night vision goggles and associated necessary equipment and training. This equipment and training would ensure that search and other flights at night in rural areas could be performed safely and efficiently. It would also provide additional safety for the crew and patient in the event of an emergency landing at night. There is $44,800 budgeted for a Helicopter pilot to work 30 hours per week. This covers personal services including benefits. F -11 FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 % A priation Unit� Actual Adopted Forecast QMA BTanded Total Budget l Sep-vices 269,346 268,500 307,100 375,400 Service Chwe 420,200 Operating Expenses Capital Outlay 37S,258 363,000 3� 80,600 387,500 9,500 397,000 56.5 /0 9.4 °/a Reserve - Capital Outlay 4,998 0 13,000 24,500 0 5,000 25,000 923% 85,000 0 180,000 p 180,000 111.8% Total Appropriations Revenues 649,602 729,500 712,200 942,900 _ 79,300 1,022,200 40.1% 42,282 0 0 0 0 0 TVA Net Cast Gen'1 Fund 607,320 719,500 7 1 ,2,00 2 9 42,900 79,300 1,022,200 -40.111/o Penrwrent Posidons 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 1.0 5.0 25.0% Forecast FY 00 /01 - Operating expenses reflect an additional $9,600 for fuel. Capital outlay has increased $11,500 (approved in a budget amendment) for painting the helicopter hangar floor. Current FY 01 /02 - Personal services will increase $93,800 based on increases for the pilots approved in the Union Contract. Operating expenses are increasing over the FY 01 adopted budget due to additional fuel costs in the amount of $14,600, insurance at $2,300, and $1,900 for uniforms required in the bargaining contract. There is $180,000 budgeted for the engine overhaul reserve. This amount is based on a four -year schedule for overhaul of two engines at $360,000. Expanded IFY 01/02 - There is $34,500 budgeted to purchase night vision goggles and associated necessary equipment and training. This equipment and training would ensure that search and other flights at night in rural areas could be performed safely and efficiently. It would also provide additional safety for the crew and patient in the event of an emergency landing at night. There is $44,800 budgeted for a Helicopter pilot to work 30 hours per week. This covers personal services including benefits. F -11 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 12 16J 2' P -12 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 13 Division of Forestry Services MSTD General Fund (111) Goal&: 16J 2 Pursuant to Florida Statute 125,27, the Division of Forestry contracts with each County Board of Commissioners to provide countywide forest fire protection. In fulfilling the provisions of this law, each district/center manager will perform the following two functions: 1) Provide a Protected Acreage Review, 2) File an annual report with the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. % of °!o of 'Dotal Programs ] a sonnel FY 02 Cosh Dollars 1 orestry Services 0.0 0.0% $12,400 100.0% To make provision for :Ore protection, based on $.03 x 413,259 acres assessment of property that requires tire equipment and personnel to suppress and contain brush fires. Grand Total 0.0 0.0% $12,400 100.0% Current FY 01/02 - Operating expenses represent a State of Florida charge of $ .03 per acre assessment on 413,259 acres of property that require fire equipment and personnel to suppress and contain brush fires thereon. F -13 FY 99/00 FY 00 /01 FY 00 /01 FY 01102 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 Ap mprietion Unit Actual Exp�Rev Adopted Bud t Forecast Ex Current Expanded TO gadget ev Service Service Budget Change Personal Service,; 0 0 0 Q Operating Expenses Capital Outlay 12,398 16,500 12,400 12,400 0 0 0 12,400 N/A -24.8% Total Appropriation~ 0 12,398 0 16,500 0 12,400 0 12,400 0 0 N/A Q 12,400 o - 2d./o 8 Net Cost MSTD (I 11) 12,398 16,500 12,400 12,400 0 12,400 -24.8% Current FY 01/02 - Operating expenses represent a State of Florida charge of $ .03 per acre assessment on 413,259 acres of property that require fire equipment and personnel to suppress and contain brush fires thereon. F -13 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 14 16J 2 Isles of Capri Municipal Fire and Rescue Services Taxing District Fund (144) Goals.- To provide for the public safety needs of the Isles of Capri community through the provision of emergency response to fire and rescue calls. F -14 % of Of P_grams. E's of a onnel FY 02 Cost Dollars Base .Level To provide fire and rescue service to be 0.0 0.0% $102,200 30.0% delivered by a combination paid/volunteer department. l aid Fire Fifihtin� Secvices Additional fire and rescue is provided by three 4.0 100.0% $213,800 62.8% (3) frill -time firefighters, twenty-four (24) hours per day, seven (7) days per week, to supplement and oversee the volunteer force. Re—senrlvu 0.0 0.0% $24,500 7.2% Grand Total 4.0 100.0% $340,500 100.0% Performance Measures #Medical Incidents Actual FY 00 Forecast FY 01 Bud et FY 02 Emergency Response Time within 4 minutes 75 g0 90 90% ° 90 /0 90% # Fire Incidents/Mutual Aid Responses Emergency Response 'rime within 10 minutes 90 95 90% 90% ° /o 90% # Marine /Boat Rescue Responses Emer enc Response Time within 15 minutes 80 90% 95 0 95 90 /o _ 90% F -14 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 P E 15 16J Isles of Capri Municipal Fire and Rescue Services 'fazing District (Cont.) Fund (X44) Permanent Positions 3.00 4,00 4.00 4.00 0.0 4.00 0.0% FOrechst FY 00/01 - Personal services are higher than budgeted due to salary adjustments for the Fire Chief and Firefighters. Revenue FY 00 /01 - An additional $5,600 was received as a reimbursement for fighting fires at Merritt Boulevard in April, 2000. Current FV 011/02 - Personal services will increase $4,800 due to additional costs in Health Insurance. Reserve FY 01102 - Reeserves are $24,700 for contingencies, merit increases, cost of living adjustments, and pay plan adjustments. Revenue FY 01 /02 - Total ad valorem revenue of $261,700 is based on taxable value of $261,721,928_ The maximum ad valorem millage to fund the operating budget is 1,0000 mill, Transfer revenue includes Collier County Fire Control District in the amount of $52,000 and Emergency Medical Services of $6,000. Additionally, there is a transfer of $5,300 from the County's General Fund to support 83% of the operating costs of the only advanced life support equipped rescue boat in Collier County, In 2000, the Isles of Capri Fire District ran a total of 64 boat responses, of which 83% were to Keewaydin Island and the open water area of the Gulf of Mexico. F -15 FY 99/00 FY 00 /01 FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 % A ro riation Unit Actual EXU/ReV Adopted Budget Forecast Exp /Rev Current Service Expanded Total Budget Personal Services 151,344 199,700 211,200 216,500 Service 0 Budget 216,500 Change 8.4% Operating Expenses Capital Outlay 68,158 4,650 84,300 88,700 88,100 0 88,100 4,5% Transfers 6,071 2,200 7,900 1,200 7,200 0 11,400 0 0 - 100.0% Reserves 0 ---73()223 26,200 0 24,500 0 0 11,400 24,500 44.3% -6.5% Total Appropriations 320,300 308,300 340,500 0 340,500 6.3% evenucs Ad Volorem 'taxes Interest/Misc. 175,764 212,400 206,200 261,700 0 261,700 23.2% Carry Forward 6,988 21,500 1,600 55,900 8,300 54,500 1,600 27,600 0 1,600 0.0% Transfers 73,800 61,000 66,900 62,800 0 0 27,600 62,800 -50.6% 3.0% Revenue Reserve _ 0 (10,600) 0 (13,200) 0 (13,200) 24,5% Total Revenue 278,052 320,300 335,900 340,500 0 340,500 6.3% Permanent Positions 3.00 4,00 4.00 4.00 0.0 4.00 0.0% FOrechst FY 00/01 - Personal services are higher than budgeted due to salary adjustments for the Fire Chief and Firefighters. Revenue FY 00 /01 - An additional $5,600 was received as a reimbursement for fighting fires at Merritt Boulevard in April, 2000. Current FV 011/02 - Personal services will increase $4,800 due to additional costs in Health Insurance. Reserve FY 01102 - Reeserves are $24,700 for contingencies, merit increases, cost of living adjustments, and pay plan adjustments. Revenue FY 01 /02 - Total ad valorem revenue of $261,700 is based on taxable value of $261,721,928_ The maximum ad valorem millage to fund the operating budget is 1,0000 mill, Transfer revenue includes Collier County Fire Control District in the amount of $52,000 and Emergency Medical Services of $6,000. Additionally, there is a transfer of $5,300 from the County's General Fund to support 83% of the operating costs of the only advanced life support equipped rescue boat in Collier County, In 2000, the Isles of Capri Fire District ran a total of 64 boat responses, of which 83% were to Keewaydin Island and the open water area of the Gulf of Mexico. F -15 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 16 Ochopee Fire Control District 16J Fund (140 2 Goals= It is the goal of the District to provide comprehensive Public Safety to the citizens, travelers, and guests of Collier County within the Ochopee Fire Control District. % Of Pro rams: of 's Personnel FY 02 Cost Total Dollars Base Level Includes fire rescue service to Chokoloskee 1.0 8.3% $98,000 8.1% Island, Plantation Island, Everglades City, Ochopee, Copeland, Lee Cypress, Port of the Islands, Alligator Alley, U.S. 41 and the contract area of the South Blocks (Collier County Fire Control District) to be delivered by a combination paid/volurnteer department. Paid Fire Fighting Services Fire Rescue as well as .Public Safety are provided 12.0 91.7% $993,300 82.6% by the Ochopee Fire Control District. esery 0.0 0.0% $111,400 9.3% Sub 'Total 12.0 100.0% $1,202,700 1100.0% E_ xnan, Services. One additional FTC Two part -time firefighters will be converted to 1.0 8.3% $23,700 2.0% two frill time firefighters. Grand Total 13.0 108.3% $1,226,400 102.0% Performance Measures # of Structure and Vehicle Fire Incidents Actual FY 00 Forecast FY O1 Budget FY 02 Emergency Response Time within 15 minutes 36 44 45 55% 55% 55% # of Brush Fire Incidents Emergency Response Time within 30 minutes 41 66 66 77% 77% 77% # of Rescue/Medical Incidents Emcr enc Res onse Time within 15 minutes 299 63% 380 °�° 354 63 63% F -16 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 17 Ocho ee Fire Control District 16J 2 P lrtct (Coat.) Fund (146) 1 evenacs Ad Valorem Taxes Transfer from CCFCD PILTCTrans Gen'1 fund lnteresVM isc. Curry Forward "Transfer IIA /TC Revenue lieservc Total Revenue Permanent Positions 479,021 FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 00 /01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 76,000 Appropriation Unit Actual Ex /Rev Adopted Budget Forecast Ex /Rev Current Service Expanded Total Budget Personal Services Operating 657,435 788,200 788,900 829,300 Service 22,600 iiud et __Bud Chan e 0 8.1% Clay cs Capital Outlay 154,307 15,589 202,100 9,800 202,900 12,900 213,700 0 213,700 5.7% Transfers 1,638 23,500 23,000 17,900 30,400 0 17,900 82.7% Rcwrvcs 0 41,400 0 111,400 0 1,100 30,400 112,500 29 -4% 171.7% ['vital Appropriations 828,969 1,065,000 1,027,700 1,202,700 23,700 1,226,400 15,2% 1 evenacs Ad Valorem Taxes Transfer from CCFCD PILTCTrans Gen'1 fund lnteresVM isc. Curry Forward "Transfer IIA /TC Revenue lieservc Total Revenue Permanent Positions 479,021 579,600 561,100 715,100 0 715,100 85,600 76,000 76,000 75,500 0 75,500 243,400 290,400 290,400 325,900 23,700 349,600 63,389 9,800 14,000 10,000 0 10,000 14,900 137,800 198,300 112,100 0 112,100 5,405 0 0 0 U p 0 (28,600) 0 (35,900) 0 (35,900) 891,715 1,065,000 1,139,800 1,202,700 23,700 i,z26,a00 23.4% -0.7% 20A% 2.0% .18.7% N/A 25.5° 15.2% 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 1.0 13.0 8.3% Forecast FY 00/01 -- Capital outlay increased $4,000 (approved in a budget amendment) for a light bar and radio for the Fire Chiefs new vehicle. Current FY 01/02 - Personal services increases are due to the FY 02 pay plan adjustment, increased health insurance costs of $7,200 and $15,100 in additional worker's compensation due to the new policy that charges more to departments that incur more costs. Operating expenses are increasing due to the $6,500 lease/purchase payment for the Fire Chief's new vehicle and additional fleet maintenance charges. Capital outlay includes $15,000 for the 800 MHz radio system and $2,900 for other machinery and equipment such as portable pumps. Budgeted reserves include $53,000 far contingencies and $36,500 for merit and cost of living adjustment increases. Revenue FY 01/02 -Ad valorem revenue is based on the taxable value of $178,777,355, at a millage rate of 4.0000 Mills. Expanded FY 01/02 - 'There is $23,700 budgeted to convert two part-time firefighters to two full -time firefighters. The impact of this expanded request reflects a reduction in the overall overtime budget for the department- F-17 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 18 Collier County Fire Control 16J 2 Fund (X48) Goals: To provide basic fire protection to the residents of the unincorporated areas of the County that are located outside the boundaries of existing fire control taxing districts. Programs: FTE,s Bale level 0.0 This district was created pursuant to Chapter 125 of the Florida Statutes by adopting Ordinance No. 84 -84, as amended. Fire protection service is delivered by four (4) fire control districts within the County through a contractual service agreement between the respective fire control districts and the BCC. This service is funded by an MSTU at a millage not to exceed 2,0 mills on the properties that are located within the District boundaries. Crand Total 0.0 F -18 % of % of Total Personnel FY 02 Cost Dollars 0.00/0 $298,500 100.0% 0.0% $298,500 100.0% 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 19 Collier County Fire Control Co nt.) 16J 2 Fund (148) Revenue: Ad Valorem Taxes FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 % Interest/Misc. Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Appropriation Unit Remittances Ex /Rev Budget Ex Rev Service Service Budget Change Operating Expenses 171,200 4,000 152,000 4,600 150,600 4,500 151,000 6,200 0 151,000 -0.7% Transfers 144,000 128,000 128,000 127,000 0 0 6,200 127,000 34.8% -0.8% Transfers -PA/TC I1,161 13,600 11,400 14,300 0 14,300 5.1% Reserves 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Total Appropriations 330,361 298,200 294,500 298,500 0 298,500 0.1% Revenue: Ad Valorem Taxes 321,987 308,400 286,800 309,100 0 309,100 0.2% Interest/Misc. 3,915 1,100 1,900 600 0 600 45.5% Transfers 3,287 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Carry Forward 12,100 4,100 10,200 4,400 0 4,400 7.3% Revenue Reserve 0 (15,400) 0 (15,600) 0 (15,600) 1.3% Total Revenue 341,289 298,200 298,900 298,500 0 298,500 0.1% Current FY 01/02 - Fire protection service is provided to the residents of the unincorporated areas of the County that are located outside the boundaries of existing fire control taxing districts through a contractual service agreement between the respective fire control districts and the BCC. The remittances /transfers to contracted fire districts is proposed to be distributed as follows: Isles of Capri- $51,500, 0chopee- $75,500, Golden Gate - $75,500, and East Naples- $75,500. These amounts are calculated by taking total ad valorem revenue for the Collier County Fire Control District less collection fees and administrative costs. Half of this amount is divided evenly between the four districts. The other half is divided based on the secondary percentage amounts stated below. Revenue FY 01/02 - Budgeted ad valorem tax revenue is based on the Collier County Fire Control District taxable value of $154,540,853 at 2.0000 mills. FY 02 Distribution Fire District Initial Secon dary Total ounded Isles of Capri $34,750 $16,750 $51,500 Ochopee $34,750 $40,750 575,500 Golden Gate $34,750 $40,750 $75,500 East Naples S34,750 $40,750 $75,500 Total $139,000 $139,000 $278,000 FY 01 Distribution Fire District Isles of Capri Initial $35,000 (25 0%) Second $17,000 (12.01 %) Total (Rounded) $52 000 Ochopee $35,000 (25'/0) $41,000 (29.33 %) $76,000 Golden Gate $35,000 (25 %) $41,000 (29.33 %) $76,000 East Naples $35,000 (25 0/*) $41,000 (29.33 %) $76,000 Total $140,000 $140,000 $280,000 F-19 07/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 Emergency Medical Services Fund (490) Goals PAGE 20 16J 2 The department of Emergency Medical Services is a single consolidated department that provides paramedic emergency medical care for Naples/Collier County under the direction of the Board of County Commissioners and in compliance with Florida Statutes, Chapter 401, The EMS Department's mission is to provide "World Class" patient care and service to the community in an efficient and cost - effective manner. ISMS Billing 4.0 0.0% $251,500 1.9% Billing and collection services are in house as a result of organizational restructuring in FY 2001. Reserves 0.0 0.0% $619,900 4.8% Subtotal 159.0 % of Programs: Rase Level Proetams of QE's pro IFY 02 Cost Total Dollars Advanced [rife Support (ALS) paramedic units 155.0 100.0% $11,789,400 89.8% respond to the communities, 911 medical Warehouse /Delivery emergencies utilizing advanced medical procedures and equipment to provide care twenty -four (24) hovers 1.0 0.6% a day, seven (7) days a week. EMS also provides for p.3% delivery of critical medical supplies to over 20 the treatment and inter - facility transportation of patients requiring advanced medical care. ambulances and a helicopter on a continuous basis to Fleet Capital �tecovery Program Includes the Capital Recovery Program to assure the 0.0 0.00/0 $460,000 3.5% integrity of the emergency response system by providing a reliable, cost -effective mechanism for Admi istrative irecror's ecre scheduled replacement/refurbishment of emergency 0.6% $31,400 vehicles. Health Bene its for Part -time E o ees 0.0 ISMS Billing 4.0 0.0% $251,500 1.9% Billing and collection services are in house as a result of organizational restructuring in FY 2001. Reserves 0.0 0.0% $619,900 4.8% Subtotal 159.0 100.0% $).3,120,800 100.00/0 Expanded Services• Warehouse /Delivery One position to replace a part-time person for 1.0 0.6% $37,900 p.3% delivery of critical medical supplies to over 20 ambulances and a helicopter on a continuous basis to meet the 911 call load. Admi istrative irecror's ecre 1.0 0.6% $31,400 02% Health Bene its for Part -time E o ees 0.0 o 0.0% $120,000 0.9% D current a in achine 0.0 0.0% $36,000 0.3% Inforntation Technolo Web and 1S Deve m t 0.0 0.0% $26,600 02% Grand Total 161.0 101.2% $13,372,700 101.9% )Performance Measures Number of calls for EMS services Actual FY 00 Forecast FY 01 Budget FY 02 % of response time within 6 minutes (Urban) 28,000 30,000 36,000 % of response time within 8.5 minutes (Rural) 840/0 80% 100% Number of basic and full cross trained Paramedic/Firefi ers 80% 124 80% 100% 131_ 80 F -20 0 ?/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 Emergency Medical Services (Cont.) Fund (490) PAGE 21 16J 2 Revenue: Ambulance Fees FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 7,129,400 Appropriation Unit Actual Rev Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Personal Services 8,576,295 Budget 9,187,600 E v 9,614,300 Service 10,439,600 Service 188,100 Budget 10,627,700 Change 15.7% Operating Expenses Capital Outlay 1,566,893 1,723,100 1,740,900 2,055,300 4,400 2,059,700 19.5% Transfers 22,139 48,700 48,500 3,000 61,900 3,000 0 36,000 36,000 -25.8% Reserves 0 732,600 0 6,000 619,900 23,400 0 29,400 880.00/0 619,900 -15.4% Total Appropriations 10,214,027 11,694,800 11,420,100 13,120,800 251,900 13,372,700 14,3% Revenue: Ambulance Fees 4,005,722 3,546,400 Prior Year Revenue 879 0 Trans. Gen') Fund 7,129,400 7,758,900 Reimburse - Fire Districts 111 0 Interest/Misc. 106,633 14,600 Canny Forward 128,500 558,500 Revenue Reserve 0 (183,600) Total Revenue 11,371,245 11,694,800 4,102,500 4,206,700 0 0 7,758,900 7,678,100 0 0 58,300 54,600 892,100 1,391,700 0 (210,300) 4,206,700 0 0 251,900 7,930,000 0 12,81I,800 13,120,800 251,900 Permanent Positions 147.0 159.0 159.0 159.0 0 54,600 1,391,700 (210,300) 13,372,700 18.6% N/A 2.2% NIA 274.0% 149.2% 14.5% 14.3% 2.0 161.0 1.3% Forecast FY 00 /O1 - Personal services are higher than budgeted due to increased overtime and implementation of the employee union contract mid -year. Revenue FY 00 /Ol - Ambulance fee revenue will be higher than budgeted due to additional runs and higher collection rates than anticipated. Current FY 01/02 - Personal services will increase $1,173,500 due to the implementation of an employee incentive plan for contract employees to partake in additional training and added responsibilities at approximately $90,000 (50 employees X $1,800), transferring the MOU (Memorandum of Understanding) Training Coordinator into EMS Fund (490) at $40,000, a salary adjustment for command staff at $244,900, $305,600 in additional regular salaries and overtime (partially due to one percent increase for contract employees and an increase in the number of hours worked per employee), health insurance at $350,200, retirement benefits at $207,800, and social security at $66,600. Workers' Compensation payments decreased $131,600 due to a new County policy that bases the charge from previous years' actual incurred costs. Operating expenses are increasing by $332,200. This includes additional fleet maintenance charges of $123,400, medical supplies at $73,000, insurance at $70,100, life pack maintenance at $30,000, malpractice fees associated with MOU activities for $25,000, consulting for EMS database networking at $1$,000, training for $15,000, increases in rent at $14,000, maintenance for medical software at $10,000 due to an expired warranty, $10,000 for uniforms required by the bargaining unit contract, and $8,800 for additional postage for EMS bills. There was a decrease of $65,000 for medicine and $27000 in minor medical equipment. , Transfers will increase from $3,000 to $6,000 for leased space at the Isles of Capri Fire Station. Revenue FY 01 /02 - Revenue projections are based on 20,400 billable nuns and varying collection rates by categories of ambulance runs. F -21 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 22 16J P -22 0?/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 Emergency Medical Services (Coot.) Fund (490) PAGE 23 16J 2 Expanded FY 01/02 — There is $37,900 budgeted for one Warehouse Technician position to maintain the EMS supply system to over 20 ambulances and a helicopter on a continuous basis. This includes $37,900 in personal services, and $600 in associated operating costs. Currently this function is performed by a part -time person. There is $31,400 budgeted for a Secretary I to assist the EMS Administrative Director. This includes $30,800 for personnel costs and $600 for associated operating costs. Capital outlay includes $36,000 for a document imaging machine to eliminate paper filing. There is $26,600 budgeted for the Information Technology E- government Web Development expansion and Geographical Information System Development. There is $120,000 budgeted for health benefits for part-time EMS personnel (based on 15 part -time personnel X $8,000) F -23 0 %/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 Emergency Medical Services * Emergency Medical Services Trust Fund (491) PAGE 24 16J. Goals: This fund accounts for the collection and disbursement of various EMS State Funds generated primarily from traffic fine revenue. % Of of Total Programs: ELLS Pe_,rsmo el FY 01 Cost Dollars EMS State Funds 0.0 010% $50,000 91.4% Traffic fine revenue is distributed by the State and used to purchase emergency medical equipment and provide EMS education and training. Reserves 0.0 0.0% $4,700 8.6% Grand Total 0.0 0.0% $54,700 100.0% F -24 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 25 Emergency Medical Services Cont. 16J Emergency Medical Services `gust Fund (491) _ R�Vcriu Carry l'�orward FY 99100 FY 00 /01 FY 00 /01 FY 01 /02 FY 01102 FY 01 /02 - 75.0% 100% State Funds Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Appropriation Unit Exp/Rev Budget Exp/Rev Service Service Budget Change Operating Expenses 39,780 26,000 59,600 25,000 0 25,000 -3.8% Medical Equipment 46,104 25,000 4,600 25,000 0 25,000 0.0% Remit. to (sire District 2,910 0 0 0 0 0 N/A EMS Grant /Pcd Scats 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A EMS Grant/121,cad 0 0 0 0 0 0 N /A. EMS Grant / Education 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Wireless Data Comm. 0 0 100,000 0 0 0 0 NIA Reserves /Refunds 0 21,200 0 4,700 0 0 0 N/A 54,700 -24.2% 4,700 - 77.8 90 -total Appropriations 88,794 72,200 164,200 54,700 0 54,700 -24.2% R�Vcriu Carry l'�orward 97,000 18,800 10,700 4,700 0 4,700 - 75.0% 100% State Funds 0 50,000 154,100 50,000 0 50,000 0.0% IMS Grant/Ped Scars 0 0 0 EMS Grant/ I 21,cad 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A EMS Grant /Education 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Helicopter Safety 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Rciatbursetnews 69,720 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Translcrs 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Interest/Misc. 6,624 3,400 0 4,100 0 0 0 0 0 NIA 0 - 100.0 " /0 Total Revenue 173,344 72,200 168,900 54,700 0 54,700 -24.2% Forecast FY 00/01 - Forecast expenditures of $100,000 is for a wireless data communication system to relay emergency call information to all emergency stations simultaneously. Expenditures are 100% ;funded by EMS State Funds generated from traffic fines received in this year or carried forward from the previous year. Current FY 01 /02 - planned expenditures in FY 02 include $25,000 for educational expenses, clothing and uniform purchases, operating expenses, medical supplies, and $25,000 in capital outlay is for medical equipment. These expenditures will be funded by the 100% EMS State Funds, carry forward and interest. F -25 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 26 Goodland/Horr's Island Fire D><str><ct 2 Fund (149) Qq_aht: To provide basic fire protection to the residents of Goodland and Horr's Island. Revenue: Ad Valorem Taxes 60,198 62,300 60,000 58,700 % of Proerams: EL� of ersonnel FY 02 Cost Total Dollars Base Level This district was created pursuant to Chapter 125 of 0.0 0 0.0% $59,800 100.0% the Florida Statutes by adopting Ordinance No. 0 1,100 3,100 4,200 0 98 -114, as amended. Fite protection service is 281.8% 0 (3,100) 0 delivered by the Marco Island Fire Control District 0 (3,100) 0.00/9 Total Revenue 60,513 through a contractual service agreement with the 63,700 59,800 0 59,800 48% BCC. This service is funded by an MSTU at a millage not to exceed 2.0 mills on the properties that are located within the District boundaries. Grand Total 0.0 0.0% $59,800 100.0% FY 99/00 FY 00 /01 FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 01 /02 % Actual Adopted Appropriation Unit 1~x /Rev Budget Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Remittances 56,376 57,500 ev 56,400 Service 600 Service 0 Bud t gunge Operating Expenses 0 0 500 56,400 0 600 56,400 -99.0% N/A Transfers -PA/TC 1,785 2,800 2,600 2,800 0 2,800 0.00/0 Total Appropriations 58,161 60,300 59,500 59,800 0 59,800 Revenue: Ad Valorem Taxes 60,198 62,300 60,000 58,700 0 58,700 -5.8% Interest/Misc. 315 0 600 0 0 0 N/A Carry Forward Revenue Reserve 0 1,100 3,100 4,200 0 4,200 281.8% 0 (3,100) 0 (3,100) 0 (3,100) 0.00/9 Total Revenue 60,513 60,300 63,700 59,800 0 59,800 48% Current FY 01 /02 - This is an MSTU providing fire protection services to the areas of Goodland and Horr's island. Prior to the Marco island incorporation, Goodland and Horr's Island were provided service by the Marco Island Fire Control District. Since Goodland and Flow's Island were excluded from the boundaries, the City of Marco Island contracted with Collier County for fire protection services for Goodland and Horr's Island. The contract amount for FY 02 is $56,400. Revenue FY 01/02 - Budgeted ad valorem is based on the Goodland and Horr's Island taxable values of $79,576,815 at 0.7377 mills. F -26 02/23/1996 03:41 Goals: 9417748828 Emergency Medical Services First Responder Training Fund (492) To provide basic medical training to the independent and dependent fire districts. 9COlr2076' of FTE's Personnel PAGE 27 16J 2 % of Total X 02 C st Dollars Memorandum of lnderstar�d & (MOU) 0.0 0.0% $75,000 100.0% First Regnonder raining Reserves EMS provides a basic medical training program for the independent and dependent fire districts. All expenses are 100% reimbursed by the fire districts. Grand Total 0.0 0.0% $75,000 100.0% A memorandums of understanding (MOU) was created between Collier County's Emergency Medical Services and the independent and dependent fire districts to provide basic medical training to firefighters. Revenue FY 00/01 - Independent and dependent fire districts in Collier County will reimburse 100% of the costs to provide the training program. This includes a reimbursement of $50,300 from the dependent and independent fire districts. Current FY 01/02 - Fund 492 will be rolled into Emergency Services Fund 490. F -27 FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 00/01 FY Ol /O2 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 % Appropriation Unit Actual Exp/Rev Adopted Budget Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Personal Services 11,264 33,300 Exp/Rev 4,500 Service 0 Service Budget Chance Expenses 16,653 30,300 22,604 0 0 0 0 0 - 100.0% Capital Outlay 35,311 6,000 0 0 0 - 100.0% Reserves 0 4,000 ' 0 75 000 0 0 0 -175.0% Total Appropriations 63,228 73,600 27,100 � 75,000 75,000 -75,()00 1775.0% 0 1.9% Revenue: Reimburse - Fire Districts 62,900 50,300 50,300 0 Transfers 45,700 0 0 0 0 - 100.00/0 Interest/Misc. 2,414 0 3,800 0 0 0 0 N/A Carry Forward 0 25,800 48,000 75,000 0 0 N/A Revenue Reserve 0 (2 500) p O 75,000 190.7% Total Revenue 111,014 ' _ 73,600 _ 102 100 0 75,000 -0 0 `� - 100.0% ' 0 75,000 .9 1.9% A memorandums of understanding (MOU) was created between Collier County's Emergency Medical Services and the independent and dependent fire districts to provide basic medical training to firefighters. Revenue FY 00/01 - Independent and dependent fire districts in Collier County will reimburse 100% of the costs to provide the training program. This includes a reimbursement of $50,300 from the dependent and independent fire districts. Current FY 01/02 - Fund 492 will be rolled into Emergency Services Fund 490. F -27 0?/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 28 Medical Examiner 16J Genelrn] Fund (001) FY01/02 c_ owls: % To provide for medico -legal death investigation 24 hours per day, 365 days per year_ Results of the investigations are reported to the appropriate agencies and/or individuals. Forem 02ml % of Pro of grams: FW$ Personnel Total FY 2 Cost Dollars Base Level 5.0 100.0% The Board of County Commissioners pursuant to $715,200 100.0% Section 406, Florida Statutes, provides the funds for POW the provision of Medical Examiner Services in Collier County. Medical Examiner Services are provided for through a contractual service agreement 0 with the Florida District 20 Medical Examiner. The 0 Florida District 20 Medical Examiner is appointed by 0 the Governor of the State of Florida. Grand Total 5.0 100.0% $715,200 100.0% F -28 FY 99/00 FY001 FY00/01 FY01/02 FY01/02 1Y01/02 % Ado r ion Unit al Forem 02ml FN=ded Total Budget PP POW Service Personal Services 0 0 0 0 0 Opesving EVenses Capit,d Outlay 674,533 689,400 689,400 715,200 0 0 715,200 N/A 3.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA Total Appropriations 674,$33 689,400 689,400 715,200 0 715,200 3.7% Rem 0 0 0 0 0 0 NA Net Cost Gen, Rev 674,533 689,400 689,400 715,2W 0 715,200 3.7% Contracted Positions 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0 0.01/0 F -28 02/23/1996 03:41 9417748828 PAGE 29 Housin g P and Urban Improvement 1bJ 2 Community Development Block Grants (121) Goals: Provide efficient management and implementation of the Community Development Block Grants in the areas of Neighborhood Revitalization, Commercial Revitalization, Housing, Economic Development and Emergency Assistance Programs administered through the Department of Community Affairs. % of D -31 % of Total Programs: FTE•s Personnel FY 01 Cost Dollars Base level (N /A) 010 0.0% $0 0.0% Phase 11 of the lmmokalee Regional Airport Industrial Park Incubator Project 0.0 0.0% $635,000 941% Reserves 0.0 0.0% $39,700 5.9% Subtotal 0.0 0.0% $674,700 100.0% Expanded Services: Entitlement Grant from U.S. Department of Housing &. Urban Development 0.0 0.0% $2,087,000 309.3% Grand Total 0.0 0.0% $2,761,700 409.3% D -31 Housing and Urban Improvement (Cont.) 16J Community Development Block Grants (121) vc i Grants FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 00101 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 01102 % Reimbursements Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget Appropriation Unit Exp/Rev Budget Exp/Rev Service Service Budget Change Personal Services 0 0 0 0 0 0 NIA Administrative & Planning 4,015 0 15,000 45,000 354,800 399,800 N/A Projects 119,831 1,100,000 100,000 590,000 1,232,200 1,822,200 65.7% Romittanccs 0 0 0 0 500,000 500,000 N/A Reserves 0 37,800 0 39,700 0 39,700 5.0% Total Appropriations 123,846 1,137,800 115,000 674,700 2,087,000 2,761,700 142.7% vc i Grants 140,730 1,100,000 115,000 635,000 2,087,000 2,722,000 147.5% Reimbursements 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Contributions 0 0 0 0 0 0 NIA Carry Forward 22,900 37,800 39,700 39,700 0 39,700 5.0% Total Revenues 163,630 1,137,800 154,700 674,700 2,087,000 2,761,700 142.7% Forecast FY 00 /01 - During FY 01, there were two grants that were budgeted, but not received. They included $350,000 for a road construction project at Harvest for Humanity, and $750,000 for Neighborhood Revitalization road project in Immokalee for 14abitat for Humanity. Project expenditures of $100,000 are for the Immokalee Regional Airport Industrial Park. Current 1~ Y 01102 - There is $590,000 budgeted for Phase II of the Immokalee Regional Airport Industrial Incubator Project. Expanded FY 01/02 - Collier County will be receiving a CDBG Entitlement Grant from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) in the amount of $2,087,000. Administrative and Planning funds in the amount of $354,800 will be for three Housing & Urban Manager positions, as well as one Planning Technician II. Related operating expenses are also included in these funds_ The following projects are planned for the program year: • Infrastructure Improvements -Habitat Village • Housing Rehabilitation - Collier Housing Alternatives • Wolf Apartments - Supportive Housing • Street Lights - Immokalee • Bus Service Immokalee, Naples, Marco Island Total Projects Remittances to other Governments include: • Park improvements - Naples • Storm Drainage Improvements - Marco Island Total Remittances D -32 $600,000 47,000 224,200 48,000 313,000 $1,232,200 $250,000 250,000 $500,000 Current FY 01/02 — A 2.9 percent increase from the FY 01 contribution amount is requested to cover the rising costs of retaining employees. The increase is based on the Miami Consumer Price Index Report. The table below provides a summary of the funding sources for the David Lawrence Center. Pro David Lawrence Center, Inc. (Cont.) State Funding $ 16J Fees $ Other $ General Fund (001) Mental Health Services 273,100 2,346,200 279,100 1,221,000 160,100 FY 99/00 FY 00/01 FY 00/01 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 FY 01/02 % 957,000 125,500 Actual Adopted Forecast Current Expanded Total Budget 1,122,000 Appropriation Unit Exp/Rev Budget Exp/Rcv Service Service Budget Change 1 3,300,000 Operating Expenses 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Capital Outlay 0 0 0 0 0 0 N/A Contributions 794,900 900,000 900,000 926,100 0 926,100 2.90/6 Total Appropriations 794 ,900 900,000 900,000 926,100 0 926,100 2.9% Net Cost Gen. Rev 794,900 900,000 900,000 926,100 0 926,100 2.99% Current FY 01/02 — A 2.9 percent increase from the FY 01 contribution amount is requested to cover the rising costs of retaining employees. The increase is based on the Miami Consumer Price Index Report. The table below provides a summary of the funding sources for the David Lawrence Center. Pro County Funding $ State Funding $ Contributions $ Fees $ Other $ Total $ Mental Health Services 273,100 2,346,200 279,100 1,221,000 160,100 4,279,400 Substance Abuse 318,600 1,838,900 218,700 957,000 125,500 3,458,700 Crisis Stabilization Unit 334,400 2,155,900 256,500 1,122,000 147,100 4,016,000 Total 926,100 6,341,000 754,300 1 3,300,000 432,700 11,754,100 .Ordinance 2001 -040 V ORDINANCE NO. 2001- to ORDINANCE ESTABLIgHING THE COLZJER COUNTY LTH AND RUMAN SERVIC98 ADVISORY OMMITM; PROVIDING FOR CMDATION AND PURPOSE1 PROVIDING FOR TEX MS OF Olri+' M APPOINTMENT OF MENS &R$, y',+ (LURE TO ATTEND Ml RANG$, AND DESIGiNATIONi OF A LIAISON; PROVIDING FOR OFFLCERS, QUORUM AND COMPIiKSATION; PROVIDING FUNCTIONS POWR S AND DUTIES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND $SVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR DISSOLUTION Olt THE COMMITTEE AND REPEAL OF ORDINAiYCR; AND PROVIDING FOR AN i1CMC IV18 DATE. WHEREM, on Mvvh 9, 2001, during the Strategic Planning Wackshop, the Road of County Commissienens discussed the need for the deveiopment of it cornprehamsivo heelth and human sarvioos plan for Collies County; and WHEREAS, County staff dedrar to have the Board of County Commiealoners establish an ad -boo advisory comnsithe to assist staff' in developing a comprehaaaive hosith and human 9edvlcas plan. NOW, THEREPORB, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OP COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COl LUM COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: IINAMOH ONE: Creatlon of the Ad Soc Health and Human Berviest Committee. Punuant to the provisions of Collier County Ordirunoa NQ, 8641, as amended or its ou saor ordinance, the Board of County Commissloaers hereby c ring's the 1HIealth and Human Swvlc u Committ a (the "Committee) to assist In the development ors, compreherulva hulth and human services plan for Collier County. lilg rION TWO: Terms of Oa'tles; Appointment of Members; and Failure to Afkad M6400 8r. The Committee is hereby cnated as sn ad hoc Committee fbr a period to expire one (1) year from date of this 4rdinanve, As authorised by Section 111.313(7)(6), FhV4d1a b'ktutar* the board of County Commissioners finds that memben from the below listed professions or oerupaetons ero detrsmined nwmasary to assist la the devolopment of a comprdwaiva haskit and human necvk= plan amd are permitted or required by this Ordinanoo. Mambarel f jAs i' . Committee shall bs aoug'ht and appointed in aocoadence with Collier County Ordlna��4o. � _ 41. as amended or its successor ordinaaoa. Tea Comrmittw shall consist of sixucn (16 mb6 fham a broad base of oitisens and disciplines inoludtng:�,,,� s � The United Way of Collier County;; r The Commctnity Found stion of Collier County e°►� The Collier County Community- -Based Caro Alliance The Soutbwat Florins Workforoe D"opmeot Board The Collier County Public School District The Collier County Sheriff's Ofnw The Collier County Hunger & Homeless Coalition The Naples Area Chamber ofConsmeme The Collier County Mental Health Association The Collier County DOnta) A99ocistiort The Nap lea Community Hospital TI.& r i k maawel t'iwn Page 2 of 3 1.6 1 http: / /www. clerk. collier. fl. us / scripts/ LFWebLink .exelweblinklbrowser.html ?doc= 11297 &E... 12/4/2001 z ,Ordinance 2001 -040 Tbp Banking and Trust Indushy The Collier County Health Cane Piannina and Finance Committee The H alth Insurance Indu etry A local independent Ha dth Cave Provider If any member of the Committee is absent from two (2) or more consecutive MesdW without a satinftrnaory•exruse, such member's posttlon may be declared vacant by the Board of County Commissioners ae proaaribsd by Colhor County Ordinance No. 96.4 1, as amwAed or Its successor ordtna=@, The Board of County Commissioners shall elect a Commission member to act u Ualson Ax IWO Committee. Upon Hoard of County Commissioners approval, the Ualson may serve to an ore W tg capacity. The finctlone, powers and duties of the Ll aison shall be to periodically inft m the. County Commission rquiling ongoing issues and activities of the Health and Human Serviooe Advisory Committee. SM—MON THREZ: Olikarn Quorum; Cbmptnsatiort. The officers of the Committee shall be elected by the wambership of this committee and WWI laclude a Chairman, Vlmduilrwan and Secretary. Tkt prueaoe of a majority of,Eta voting members shall coaatitute it quorum. The Committee may adopt ruler and procedures, fx the trunction of business and oball keep records elf meetings, findings and detern-duttons. The members of tho Committee &lull serve without compensation, but taay be reimbursed ibr travel, miloW andfor per diam expanses only if approved, fit advoace� by the Hoard of County Coartminloiurs. 9Il MON FOUR: Fudctions, Powers end Duties of the Committee. JU fiutotions, powers and dueWs of the Committee shall be to propose as integrated system of private surd public fbnding to meet the steeds afloat health and human service ailoatcies. All numiuge shall be open to the public snd,ball begoverned by the Florida Government to the Sunshine Law. All meetings shall be held attar reasonable public notice is paovided as eo the load== time and subject matte of the nwetings. SZCrION FIY& Conflict and Severebillty. In the evern this Ordinance confilow with any other ordnatue of Cashier County or other applicable lava, the more rw4ictive snail apply. If any phrase or potion of thi s Ordinance hr hold Invalid or uawneltutlonal by any court of eompotgnt jurisdictian, such portion shall be deemed it separate, dintinot and independent provision aed such holding shall trot afltot the validity ofthe remaining portion. S ICnON BIXt DlaWatlon arCownd1(ts4 Repeal of Ordlnsnca At the conclusion of one, (1) year itorn the date of this Ordiaaw% ttta Committee's as+rvlcea shall be dissolved and this Ordiaance shaft be automatically repealed. K by resolution, the Hoard of County Cammissionars exesads the tear of the Committee. this repeallbg provision shell be extended until to Commitim is dissolved. 91crION SZVE tr Motive Date. This Ordinance shall tike eflbct upon filing with the Department of State. Page 2 of 3 61J 2 http: / /www.clerk.collier. fl.us/ scripts/ LFWebLink .exe /weblink/browser.html ?doc= 11297 &t,... 12/4/2001 Ordinance 2001-040 Page 2 of 3 16 PASSW AND DULY ADOPTRD by th*BoudofCountYCommiloionmofColticr CQVn*Y, Florida wl"dayof A T-1 BOARD OF COUNTY COAWSSIOMIRS .-D-oh qHT, B. 0 1Keltlark OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLOAMA Pq q mm r Approved as to foxin and losal sufflaiancy, (amnirc Chid Asaktant County Attorney This cwdrrqm0► fit wplh *w SocrotatV Of %013 Office th* 910A -1 y of MASA' M61V and acknowwo-104 f ftt flir" h"14 -eh duy of **9�6 IN , VAM;,/ 04lx* Cwk -- http:llwww.clerk.collier.fl.uslscriptsALFWebLink.exelweblinklbrowser.html?doc=l1297&t,... 12/4/2001 Ordinance 2001 -040 P ge 2 of 2 1 -1 ST&TS OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COI.LI&R) X, DWIGHT E. BROCX, Clerk of Courts in gad fox the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy oft ORDIVANCR NO. 20pl -40 Which was adopted by the Board of County Comissioners on the 26th day of ouue, 2001, during Regular session, ALIT -NESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County 00 mierioners of Collier County, Florida, this 27th day of aune, 2001. DWIGHT $ . BROCIC ' r 'r • • ; Clerk of Courts am4 by i EX- affiCio to Board 49p,- • '' County Couuaissioasrp', �ZA _ 3 - : 1 �' Nm eye Buie HoilrnaA,,' �°.•'��ri' Deputy Clerk* 0 Page 14 of 4 � Powered by LaserFiche WebLink v5.01: Registered to Collier County Clerk of Court http://www. clerk. collier. fl. us / scripts/ LFWebLink .exe /weblink/browser.html ?doc= 11297 &t,... 12/4/2001 A O 0 ZVI m m w n CD CD a a o _ W N Z3 a cb a 0 a 0 c n m • y ��oo zo w • • ••, ac w O <R sspa> I"r �' • o yn � < n CD O 0 am O (D O CD � cn RLo N n• mac 0 0� � O Q- 2 a �' _ 0. = CD 0 O ' � O � N n fn' CD < n O uq oo 59. Z 0 O O O n C CD w b '-t — CD -°o o o �' ° 0' o o °. w p CD CD CD CD rn � ..a fl.. a• O O a' QQ o c� w N �G y �4 0 b nQ y ��oo zo w • • ••, ac w O <R sspa> I"r �' • o yn � < n CD O 0 am O (D O CD � cn RLo N n• � O � O Q- CD '•i O �' _ 0. = CD 0 O ' � O � n fn' CD < c: to ?� iD' o cCD n' O n C CD w b '-t — CD c� o o �' trwo a � 0' o °. CD CD O y �4 0 b nQ I r O �s CD 0 a✓ A n 0 3 o�oo�owCAQ w Lo �o o � y ��oo zo n�aa � ac w y Q � A7 � sy I"r �' • o .`i � (D C Mn am O CD � cn RLo N n• � O � O Q- CD '•i r. �' CD I r O �s CD 0 a✓ A n 0 3 o�oo�owCAQ w Lo �o o � zNx z •CD• � Z W w Q•, N � '`nT � D d � r. y ��oo � c� � sy I"r �' • o .`i � Mn � w O � � N n• � O � O Q- CD '•i r. �' n fn' iD' o o a '-t — CD rn � ..a zNx z •CD• � Z W w Q•, N � '`nT � D d � r. `/ I r) w ` •..� � � cr r. Lr n tnooOAV)..;0 r w O �O O � 2 y ��oo c� � sy I"r �' • o .`i � w � O Q- CD '•i r. �' iD' o o a '-t — CD `/ I r) w ` •..� � � cr r. Lr n tnooOAV)..;0 r w O �O O � 2 ��oo c� s r.+ x C O L a� 4. 'O .r� `V Gtr E 3 c cn 00 t_ y a •�, , C U U y cd + ° cd In p LA o b a=o� a�E �'o es o c° bc° bn. L U E UUUO, ova U�s� 16J 2 o u L to 40- F, c"ii > b N c rs o o -o bn a� bD s � � � U � a� � a � a`�i > c �, U � y U cd O O a N U U N V sU. ed . U cd "C .0 O O n by E O v cd N '+, , , z, > c„ E > c o s- cdi � y a E y ee o ova �._ �n.sE- Eve .�W-o Va` ee � • • • • N �O C a L�3 E ; EF-� E : to a� o E Q E O to N ,1 on x a c O r bD � C bD _ O Csr N 'O 0 co 0 W O 0 00 G W Q cd c T O z U cz O O Y o �4 cc��wz M cn r- O L �+ U 00 00 •^ C cn r.-. O , ':3 —c; 4. y •O M v N ' 'c N .� a ao cz Ewz�oa y L p N �O C a L�3 E ; EF-� E : to a� o E Q E O to N ,1 on x a O r bD � O a O cz W O U ca '0`�3 T c U z O O Y o �4 cc��wz N �O C a L�3 E ; EF-� E : to a� o E Q E O to N ,1 on x U V M v N ' 'c N a O y L p _U `6 r o O 'i a cd o a o d '� 0N 0 ^C r +l$ A N N U L E U En E CZ cz U L � °>>' V "'� O O cd p� a° cd . U E a C O U cd cd �+. r cz ..O O + U O 0 4. L s Gd • cn N .--. 'C ca ' O cC '� 4- �. +' 4. cd N ¢ Y '�O CA -a �.. r'Lii Ln cYd �GCI �' L cc � _> U .- E • U4 r- w.+ • LOA _-Nier W4,0A HeAnnual ort � G,;X.G mw.. I , he11,,n,1 0. 2000 — 2001 Collier County Health Department 2000 -2001 Highlights Special accomplishments for the past year include: Implemented a new Beach Water Monitoring Program in which 13 beach sites from North Col- lier County to Marco Island are tested for water quality every two weeks. Instrumental in the passing of a Collier County ordinance, which ensures professional mainte- nance of the 1,200 public swimming pools in Collier County. Received statewide recogni- tion of the Generation Ex- cellence, our Community Intervention Program to re- duce heart disease, high blood pressure and diabe- tes, as a model program in Immokalee. • Organized the Immokalee Migrant Housing Team to improve efficiency of Envi- ronmental Health inspec- tions in migrant housing. Developed new software for case management services for people with HIV /AIDS. • Coordinated the develop- ment and publication of the Final Report of the Collier County Health Care Review Committee to the Board of Collier County Commissioners. Initiated utilization of the Merlin intranet -based communicable disease reporting and analysis system - Collier County was one of four county Health Departments selected Statewide to par- ticipate in the pilot project during the year. • Obtained an $80,000 grant to assist with Disas- ter Preparedness Planning, Shelter Planning and review of disaster plans for home health agencies. Provided leadership in obtaining matching funds to expand the Healthy Kids enrollment. • Provided flu vaccine to 10,174 high risk persons in spite of delays and shortages of vaccine. • Received an $83,500 grant from Southwest Florida Workforce Development board to provide a unique Teen Pregnancy Preven- tion program based on a home visiting module to first time preg- nant or parenting teens. • Immunization Team received state -wide recognition through a Davis Productivity Award for their work on improving vaccine ac- countability. • Strengthened the community partnership in School Health through the collaborative develop- ment of a School Health Services Strategic Plan covering a 5 -year period. • Conducted two grant- funded Soul Food Luncheons in Immoka- lee to promote an increased awareness of healthy nutrition practices for pre - conceptual and pregnant minority women. Presented at the annual Sharing Solutions Con- ference where one of the Family Support Work- ers was honored as a "Healthy Start Hero" for her efforts to educate Hispanic pregnant women. • Partnered with local physicians and agencies to . Opened a new clinic for Pediatric Dental Ser- re- establish a Prenatal Care Clinic for pregnant vices in January 2001. women at or below 200% of poverty. PAGE 2 ANNUAL REPORT Preventing Epidemics and the Spread of Disease Immunization Program Vaccines are one of the most effective preventive health measures of the 20th Century and are responsible for the decline in mortality and morbidity from infectious diseases widely prevalent in the U.S. Vaccines are responsible for the substantial achievements that have been made in control of many vaccine - preventable disease. Smallpox has been eradicated from the world, poliomyelitis has been eliminated from the US and many parts of the world, and measles and Haemphilus influenza among children less than 5 years have been reduced to record lows. In Collier County, the percent of 2 year olds being fully immunized has risen from 71% in 1997 to 86.2% in 1999. In FY 1999 -2000 the CHD provided 29,943 immunization services including 10,174 flu and pneu- monia vaccinations. Tuberculosis cases per 100,000 population. Collier County. Florida 1980 -2000 30 25 N 20 10 -_ -_ _....... ... ... ......... ....:. 5 0 l0 lot, 90a 1.1, $ a` Kati 01 11`° moo° Cofer C—ty HIV+ / AIDS Epidemic In 1999, 2,216 persons received HIV confidential testing in Collier, of which 14% (32) tested positive. Half (50 %) of all positive results were black; 25% were in young adults (20 -29) which indicates teen- age exposure, and 26% of all HIV positive test re- sults were in persons over age 50. Reported AIDS cases per year, in Collier County, peaked in 1993 and has steadily fallen each year since then ( 1993 - 2000). This is due to advances in AIDS treatment and availability of medications to all HIV positive clients in the clinic program. The actual number of HIV positive cases are still increasing. Efforts for prevention continue. Vaccine Preventable Diseases - Confirmed Collier County 1998 - 1999 Collier °0 30 20 britla Collier Trendline 10 0 ill lu tarA—Mrlw� Source: 130sion of Family 8 owsonal Health. Coffer County Flealth Dspartr nt. PFIDS (DOH. Uri- of %nnng. &aluation, and Dal, Analysis Tuberculosis (TB) TB is an airborne disease that is communicable to close contacts when it is in its active stage. The increased use of Directly Observed Therapy in treating active TB has resulted in a > 95% cure rate and reduced the likelihood of multi- drug- resistant TB in Collier County. In 2000, for the first time in history, Collier County's case rate for TB (6.41 per 100,000) was lower than Florida's rate. In Collier, there have been no pediatric cases of TB since 1997. Over 500 people annually receive TB preventative therapy from the Collier County Health Department. HIV+ AND AIDS IN COLLIER YEAR #HIV+ #AIDS 1997 12 55 1998 37 47 1999 36 45 2000 42 28 Source: Disease Intervention Services, Collier County Health Department ANNUAL REPORT EDidemioloav and Health Assessment Epidemiology is the science of the distribution and de- terminants of disease occurrence in populations. Its main activities are to interrupt disease transmission and investigate reportable health conditions, problems and public health hazards throughout the community. In order to carry out its mission Epidemiology relies on various statistical tools such as rates to measure pro- gress towards disease prevention and elimination within the community and to uncover any unexpected increase of disease which may pose an increased risk to the public health. During calendar year 2000 a total of 1109 "reportable" conditions and diseases were reported to the Health Department locally. This is an increase of 17.4% over 1999. On a per capita basis ( adjusting for population growth ) this resulted in a rate of increase of over 14 %. Overall over 2400 residents and visitors utilized epidemiologic disease prevention and intervention services during the year. The Epidemiology and Health Assessment Division is meeting the challenges of the increasing population of Collier County by monitoring and evaluating the health situation of the community and preventing the spread of disease. The Division also played a major role in the development and publication of the Final Report of the Collier County Health Care Re- view Committee to the Board of Collier County Commis- sioners. Huth insurance Coverage in Collier County for the Population Under 65 Years of Age, 1999 INSUR 82 0'+ nI �,...,...., PAGE NUMBER OF CONFIRMED DISEASES OR CONDITIONS REPORTED TO THE DIVISION OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND HEALTH ASSESSMENT, COLLIER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT WITH RATES PER 100,000 POPULATION, 2000 TOTAL RATES PER NUMBER OF 100,000 DISEASE OR CONDITION CASES (2000) POPULATION Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome 28 12.3 Animal Bile 12 5.3 Campylobaclenos, 50 22.0 Chlarnydia 526 231.4 ' Eschenchia coN 0157:117 4 1.8 Giardiasis 58 25.5 Gonorrhea 158 69.5 Hepatitis A 6 2.6 Hepatitis 8 11 4.8 Hepatitis +HBSAG: Pregnant Women 10 4.4 HIV 42 18.5 Lead Poisoning 20 8.8 Legionellosis 1 0.4 Lyme Disease 2 0.9 Malaria 3 1.3 Meningococcal Disease 2 0.9 Pedussis 1 0.4 Pesticide- Related Illness and Injury 1 0.4 ;"Rabies. Animal' 4 1.8 Saimoneflosis 54 23.8 Shigellosis 33 14.5 Streptococcal Disease, invasive group A 9 4.0 Streptxomus Pneumoneae. Invasive Diseas 14 6.2 Syphilis 40 17.6 Tuberculosis 15 6.6 Typhoid Fever 2 0.9 Vibrio infections 3 1.3 Tdd Reporta0b CarrdltifKro 1109 487.9 1riqukles, conswilladons, and of n01F1spptaw ee rrdltlons 1323 582.0 TOW AN HaMh Condidarls 2432 1069.9 Source: Division of Epidemiology And He+aft Assessment When County Health DeparUnent Monitoring Health Status Vital Statistics Leading causes of death are analyzed by the CCHD in The Vital Statistics office issued a total of 28,371 order to plan for public health programs and to meas- birth and death certificates during the year ure progress and disparities in various dis- 2000 . This was an increase of 5.2 % over eases and health conditions among popula- the prior year and can be attributed to Cerlificutr of rt ;firth tions within the community. Rates and other overall population growth. statistical methods are used in public health in order to quantify vital statistics into useful health information for the community. PAIGE ANNUAL REPORT Diagnosing & Investigating Health Problems Hepatitis Program Chronic Liver Disease & Cirrhosis is the 7th leading cause of death in Collier County (1999). The number of people who tested positive for Hepatitis C antibody ranked second when compared to the total num- ber of cases reported to the CCHD Epidemiology Division during the year 2000. Hepatitis B ranked 14th in total number of reportable dis- eases for the same year. There is an estimated 4,100 residents in- fected with chronic Hepatitis C. The grant- funded Hepatitis Program provides community -based screening for Hepatitis A, B and C as well as integrated treatment services for Hepatitis C. Services include: Risk assessment, Risk re- duction counseling, Testing, Vaccination for Hepatitis A and B, and Case management, treatment and referrals. The Hepatitis Program obtained $231,000 in grant funding through the Florida Hepatitis Prevention & Control Program for FY2000 -2001, and an additional $231,000 for FY2001 -2002. 1995 19% 1997 1998 1999 0 Early syphilis ■ Gonorrhea ochlamydis Source: Division of Epidemiology And Health Assessment Collier County Health Department '97 '918 '99 '00 ❑ ITV(&Uio ■ WV(&Uio Source. Division of Epidemiology And Health Assessment Collier County Health Department Sexually Transmitted Disease (STD) The number of cases of Chlamydia increased from 402 cases in 1999 to 526 cases in 2000 - an increase of 31 %, primarily due to a new diagnostic test that is both more accurate and economical. Cases of gonorrhea are relatively stable. Early syphilis has de- creased in Collier from 37 cases in 1994 to 14 cases (62% de- crease) in 2000, despite the fact that major outbreaks of early syphilis are occurring in surrounding counties. During 2000, a total of 40 cases of syphilis were reported — none of which were con- genital. Promoting and Encouraging Healthy Behaviors Chronic Disease Community Intervention Pro- gram (CIP) Generation Excellence Immokalee Health Campaign is a grant- funded chronic disease prevention project in the Immokalee community. With an emphasis on reducing the impact of heart disease, high blood pressure and diabetes, the intervention focus is to increase physical fitness, pro- mote tobacco avoidance, and improve nutrition, targeting the youth, their families, and the community. This program averages over 600 participants per month in a variety of physical education programs and activities. Health screenings have been provided to over 1500 residents from July— December 2000. This pro- gram has been recognized as a "model program" by the State Depart- ment of Health and was featured in "Health Departments Take Action: A Compendium of State and Local Models Addressing Racial And Ethnic Disparities ", published by the National Association of County Health Offi- cers. ANNUAL REPORT Tobacco Prevention PAGE 5 The leading underlying cause of death is the use of tobacco. The Tobacco Pre- vention Program is trying to unite a generation of youth to prevent tobacco ac- ceptance and use. With the emphasis of youth leadership and involvement, this 519AT program has grown in the past year from 6 to 15 S.W.A.T. (Students Working Against Tobacco) clubs, reaching an estimated 10,000 youths. Statewide, there has been a 40% reduction in middle school tobacco use, and an 18% reduction in high school tobacco use within the first two years of pro- gram operation. School Health During the 2000 -2001 school year, 13,500 vision screenings, 10,200 hearing screenings, 10,500 growth and development screenings, and 2100 scoliosis screenings were provided. Referral and follow -up of abnormal outcomes continue throughout the school year. In addition to the mandated school screenings, the Collier County Health Department works through various community partners to help improve the health of students. Promoting Healthy Families Preventing Infant Mortality Infant mortality is what we refer to as a sentinel indicator for the overall health of the community. Healthy out- comes for pregnant women and children are a result of early, continuous prenatal care, a healthy environment and healthy behaviors. Pregnant women need to begin prenatal care in the first three months of pregnancy and avoid risky behaviors such as smoking, alcohol consump- tion, and poor nutrition. Healthy Start, a case management / home visitation pro- gram, provides health education and assistance to preg- nant women experiencing health - related issues for them- selves and their infant that could negatively impact their pregnancy or their child's growth and development. The CCHD provided Healthy Start services to 1,625 pregnant women and 636 infants in FY 1999 -2000. Pediatric Dental Clinic Tooth decay is the most common disease of childhood. Almost 3 times as many children lack dental insurance as lack medical insurance. As of January 2001, a pediatric dental clinic was opened to serve Collier's indigent and low income populations. With a combination of grant fund- ing, Medicaid and limited self -pay, the clinic is operating within its budget, while serving 893 children from January 16th through April 301h 2001. Infant Mortally Rafe Trends colter Cor.ty 19W - IM 50- Black IM2 Trend HeallthyStart 40 Total IM2Trene Implemented � 30 Black 1992 1992 IL 20 — — :__ .� 0 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 So„rce Drism* .. o!ramiiy8 ?meo,�- ,ean:n..:.ola Go,u.rte i,eaim �wn�.,em, atatLra D%i¢c ci ala•mmq fvakatior a=a Data hrWye.,�. Promotina Kid Care Efforts to have all eligible children enrolled in the Kid Care health insurance program resulted in a 79% increase in overall enrollment in Collier County. Funding Sources for the Collier County Health Department Dental Clinic for FY 2000 - 2001 HK Delta 7 %, 3% Head Start CMS 2 % -, Self -Pay 14% 74% Medicaid Sotrce: Dental Clinic, Division of Family & Personal Health. Cole( County Hearth Department PAGE 6 March 2001 WIC Site Participation Source: WIC Program, State of Florida ANNUAL REPORT Supplemental Nutrition Program for Pregnant Women, Infants and Children (WIC): Available in 4 community locations, the WIC program serves an average of 5250 participants every month. This program combines nutrition assessment and edu- cation with a free nutritious food package that allows families to put into practice the nutrition advice they receive. Over $3.2 million dollars in milk, cheese, ce- real, juice, eggs, dried beans and peanut butter were provided through the Collier WIC program in 2000. Collier WIC was recognized for its efforts to promote breastfeeding. Over 71% of Collier WIC babies have been breastfed, one of the highest percentage rates in the State of Florida. Protecting Against Environmental Hazards Beach Water Monitoring In cooperation with Collier County Government, Environmental Health and Engineering began test- ing on August 1, 2000 for bacterial contamination at 13 beach sites. Samples are collected biweekly and tested for fecal coliform and Enterococcus contamination. All Gulf beach sites have been rated as "good ", over all. This is the highest rating possible. This testing and monitoring program pro- vides quality assurance for the residents and visi- tors who enjoy our beaches. Public Swimming Pool Safety Environmental Health and Engineering staff moni- tor over 1200 public swimming pools to ensure the safety and well being of all bathers. This is accom- plished by: plan review, annual permitting, routine inspections, periodic water sampling, and pool op- erator certification through educational courses taught by staff. The ultimate goal is to prevent drowning, injuries and waterborne disease. Our continuing efforts are reflected in the fact that there have been no drowning or reportable diseases in public pools in Collier County for the past five years ANNUAL REPORT Environmental Health Facilities Programs Environmental Health staff regulates many diverse public facili- ties through plan review, permitting and on -site inspections. Our staff is responsible for regulating: food service facilities in schools, nursing homes, assisted living facilities, jails, child care facilities, hospitals, migrant housing, group care facilities, mobile home parks, and tanning salons. Staff also conducts regular food sanitation courses for kitchen personnel in all facilities. The effectiveness of these programs is demonstrated by the very low incidence of food borne disease outbreaks in these facilities, in Collier County. OSTDS Septic System Program Scum L°r.r Environmental Health and Engineering ongoing effort to pro - N ate tect Collier County's surface and groundwater from sewage Feld contamination is exemplified by our septic system program, which in the past year has completed plan reviews and in- spections of over 1100 new septic systems. We closely monitor design and installation to ensure outstanding quality. Sentinel Chicken Surveillance Environmental Health and Engineering is in the first stage of monitoring the possible presence of mosquitoes that serve as carriers of Saint Louis Encephalitis and the West Nile Virus. Beginning June 1, 2001, at five remote locations, including Immokalee, chickens will be tested for the presence of viral antibodies in blood samples drawn biweekly. This program will serve as an early warning indicator of the presence of these viruses in Col- lier County. t a,bm nrgrwa* . Preparing for Disaster Disaster Preaaredness In cooperation with County Emergency Management, Home Health agencies and the medical community, the Collier County Health Department coordinates and staffs the Special Needs Shelters every time we mobilize for a hurricane threat. Both the increased incidence of hurricanes and the population growth of Collier County has increased the concern and demand for this service. Other disaster efforts include preparing for the risk of bioterrorism and the po- tential for an influenza pandemic. The goal is to make sure that the unex- pected is not a surprise. PAGE 8 COLLIER COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT P.O. Box 429 Naples, FL 34106 Phone: 774 -8210 Mier W"""ACounty Health Departure Thr II'e! / 0", ('omm in ANNUAL REPORT Collier County Health Department Locations Naples Main Office 3301 Tamiami Trail East Health and Public Services Bldg. H Mailing: P.O. Box 429 Naples, FL 34106 -0429 Phone: (941) 774 -8200 Fax: (941) 774 -5653 Naples Environmental Health Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (941) 403 -2499 Fax: (941) 643 -6870 Immokalee Office 419 North First Street Immokalee, FL 34142 Phone: (941) 658 -7300 Fax: (941) 658 -7329 7��Ik Working through Community Partnerships To achieve its mission, the CCHD often works in part- nership with other agencies. The Healthy Families Collier Program is an excellent example of how we work to- gether to assure the health of our com- munity. The CCHD in collaboration with the Children's Home Society, established the Healthy Families Collier Program (HFC) to provide home visiting services to pregnant women and women with newborns in Immokalee. The CCHD was awarded $84,013.91 to provide sub contracted services for the program. In 1999/2000, 98 families (196 individu- als) were enrolled in HFC. Services were provided to the various ethnic groups residing in Immokalee by direct service staff fluent in English, Spanish, Creole, and the Guatemalan dialect Canjobal. enhance program services, HFC sought out and obtained additional grant funding from the Community Foundation of Collier County in the amount of $9,200.00 and from the Immokalee Foundation in the amount of $7,500.00. In the first annual Family Satisfaction Survey, administered by the Children's Home Society Region 5 Quality Improvement Department, 91 percent of clients rated the quality of service they received from Healthy Families as excel- lent or good. Additionally, 100 percent indi- cated satisfaction with the help received from the HFC home visitor and with the information provided on child development, parenting skills, and baby health and development. One of the goals of the program is to reduce the inci- dence of child abuse and neglect. To date, there have been no verified reports of child abuse or neglect of any family enrolled in the HFC program. r 16J 2 WORKSHOP PROPOSED COLLIER COUNTY PRIMARY CARE PROGRAM FOR THE UNINSURED September 4, 2001 16J 2 WORK SHOP PROPOSED COLLIER COUNTY PRIMARY CARE PROGRAM FOR THE UNINSURED ❖ INTRODUCTION --Tom ➢ We are here to present the business plan for the Collier County Primary Care Program for the Uninsured: ■ You agreed in principle in April 2001 but you asked for more details -- we are here to give you the detail. ➢ Review Agenda -- 16J 2 ■ We have a number of speakers today - most of whom have been active with our Committees and have been involved in specific aspects of our proposal. ■ I will introduce the speakers at the appropriate time. ■ Prior to addressing our business plan, we will have two speakers address the current situation. • Phyllis Busansky will address the national scene highlighting that while the problems are national, the solutions need to be local. 16J 2 • Bill Lascheid, the Founder of the Neighborhood Clinic, will talk about one of our local challenges, the need for enhanced primary care for our target population. • In addition, I would like to introduce our consultant, Dave Rogoff. 16J 2 + Highlights of the April 2001 presentation. ➢ Current situation is intolerable. • Thousands of people do not have health coverage. • Our community has a high percentage (90 %) of small businesses (less than 10 employees). • We rely on low- income wage earners to support our quality of life. • Private industry has not provided insurance because of cost and we cannot legally make them do so. 16,1 Z 5 ■ The overall effect is that about 18% of our County's residents under 65 years old are uninsured -- even though most are working. ■ The private sector health care system cannot work on its own. • The current system is based upon the ER as a safety net. ♦ May not be true emergency -- it may be the only source of primary care. ♦ Even when it is a true emergency -- it could possibly have been prevented or addressed more cost effectively by earlier intervention. 16J 2 ♦ Once the episode is over, there is little follow -up. • We need government help. • The state and federal government will not help us unless we start by helping ourselves. ➢ Results of April 2001 Meeting ■ You agreed in principle but you asked for more details -- we are here to give you the detail. ■ The concepts that agreed to were: •Coordinated system of primary care (the focus of most of our presentation and discussion.) 16J 2 • Take advantage of already existing programs and funding. ♦ Protect the school nurse program. ♦ Build up the outreach for Healthy Kids. ♦ Coordinate with other health care payors such as Medicaid and Medicare ➢ In Florida, Medicaid only pays for pregnant women and children. ➢ Medicare pays for the elderly. OVERVIEW OF TODAY'S RECOMMENDATION: 8 16,1 2 ❖ In order to improve access to health care for its low- income residents, Collier County is proposing an integrated system of primary and preventive health care services. ❖ Eligible enrollees will be 19 to 64 years old, working Collier County residents whose annual family income is equal to or less than 154% of the Federal Poverty Guideline (FPG). ❖ Primary care providers (PCP's) will be responsible for seeing patients, ongoing management of their care and, when appropriate, making referrals for hospital, specialty, and other services 16,1 2 and therapies through the "We Care" Program to be established. ❖ DESCRIBE CHART. 10 16J 2 System of Integrated Primary and Preventive Health Care Services 11 GOVERNANCE AND CONTROL -- --------------------------------------------------------- t ----- t --------------------- )L COMPREHENSIVE, CASE MANAGED PRIMARY CARE AND PREVENTION CORE SERVICES DISEASE ([ACCESS MANAGED AN[ • Primary Care Outreach • Preventive Services INTEGRATIVE Enrollment • Related Pharmacy REFERRAL Health Educ. • Related X-Ray/Lab SYSTEM J HOSPITAL SERVICES SPECIALTY CARE OTHER SOCIAL SERVICES TUP" SERVICES / THERAPIES OTHER AGENCIES ---------------------------------------- ------ ------------------------------------------- - ----------------------- : National Scene Phyllis Busansky 16J Z Phyllis Busansky is the President of the Community Health Leadership Center (CHLC). The CHLC exists to provide assistance and guidance to communities that are addressing health care access for the uninsured and is funded by private sector money. This is a natural progression from her previous work in assisting the Health Research Services Administration (HRSA) of the US 16J 2 Government for the last couple of years as part of the 100% Access, Zero Disparities Campaign. In that capacity, she has worked with numerous communities. Ms. Busansky is a Senior Fellow of the Hudson Institute's Welfare Policy Center (WPC). The WPC researches innovative strategies to address welfare and social services reform and assists governments and community -based organizations in redesigning social services. T'6 J 2 Prior to joining the Hudson Institute, Ms. Busansky served as executive director of the Florida Work and Gain Economic Self- Sufficiency (WAGES). Under her leadership, the welfare caseload decreased by over 80 %, saving the state more than $500 million in welfare payments. She also served as a Hillsborough County (Tampa, FL) commissioner, during which time she championed the establishment of the county's Indigent Health Care Plan. 16J 2 MISSION AND OBJECTIVES: Mission: ❖ Facilitate access to primary and prevention- focused health care services for uninsured County residents. Community Goals: low- income, working ❖ Improve health and quality of life of target population. 16J 2 ❖ Improve productivity of target population through improved health by: ➢ Reduced absenteeism, ➢ Reduced turnover, and ➢ Improved on the job performance. ❖ Reduce the community's cost of uncompensated care. ❖ As a result, improve the health and quality of life of the overall Collier County community. Program objectives: 1'b J 2 ❖ Increase access to affordable health care. ❖ Provide low -cost pharmaceuticals. ❖ Reduce inappropriate use of hospital emergency rooms. ❖ Reduce unnecessary hospitalization for avoidable conditions. ❖ Utilize success of the obtain additional state, private sector funds. program to federal, and 16,1 2 PROGRAM DETAILS: People to Be Served and Covered Services - -Steve Rasnick Primary Care Services -- Tom ❖ Recommendations. ➢ A Community Approach. Health Center 1'6 J 2 • Shortage of primary care physicians and need to recruit PCPs. • Ease of administration. ➢ Primary care services offered in two geographic locations, Naples and Immokalee. ❖ We met with various health care providers to determine interest, capacity, and the potential to serve a large volume of patients. 16,1 2 ❖ Based upon these meetings, the only organization that came forward with interest, capacity, and the potential to serve a large volume was CHSI. ❖ However, there should still be a bidding process to confirm this conclusion, allow others to propose, and to negotiate the most favorable contract. ❖ About CHSI: E ►a Em Mission is to assist in 16J 2 providing primary care access for the uninsured and people eligible for health care under state and federal government programs. Designated Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) for Immokalee. Examples of advantages are: ■ Recruiting primary care physicians to treat low income populations 21 16J'2 ■ Access to preferred pricing such as the 340B pharmacy pricing. ■ President Bush's administration is emphasizing the FQHC's as a focal point for expansion of primary care services. • Additional monies have been put into the federal budget to support FQHC expansion. • However, in order for a community to leverage these funds there will need 16J 2 to be a demonstrated local financial commitment. Related Pharmacy Services -- Steve Rasnick Hospital and Specialty Referral Services Uncompensated Care Slide -- Tom 3 16J 2 WHO BEARS THE CURRENT COSTS OF SERVICE TO COLLIER COUNTY'S UNINSURED? TAXPAYERS =$3M + (Discretionary Funds and Support to Heath Dept and David Lawrence) NOT FOR PROFIT PROVIDERS = $20M to $40M (such as N CH, David Lawrence, CHSR Neighborhood Cknic, Cleveland Clinic, Foundation, SeniorFriendship) PH YSICIA NS = $10 M + EMPLOYERS / OTHER PA TIENTS = ?? (Through Cost Shdting) We Care,-- Wendy Wilderman 16J: 2 Governance and Administration -- Tom: ❖ Voluntary Advisory Board Appointed by and Reporting to BOCC. ➢ Represents major stakeholders: • County Health Department, • County government, • Provider groups, physicians, • Not - for - profit social service and health care agencies, • Citizen groups, and • Clinic users. 126 J 2 ➢ Address major areas of program policy and oversight such as management and financial performance, medical issues, and patient relations. •'• This is a governance structure that has worked well in other programs for the uninsured in Florida and elsewhere in the United States. ❖ Administration: ➢ Push most of administration to primary clinic and We Care. 26 16J ➢ Still some administration by Public 2 Health Department and / or County Social Services Department. • Eligibility • Contract oversight ❖ Third Party Administrator (TPA) ➢ What type of tracking needs to occur? ■ Clinical utilization data review. • Encounters • Cost effectiveness. • Quality of care (appropriate) review. • Accountability 1'6 J 2 ❖ For this program -- ➢ TPA used mainly for oversight and future planning not claims preparation and bill collection (since no bill is being sent.) ➢ Most data will be collected at site of service and monitored. BUDGET: ❖ Solicited input from various sources, including the Public Health Department, the County Government, CHSI, and research and professional opinion of our consultant. 16,1 2 ❖ Chart summarizes the proposed primary care budget for the first four fiscal years of operations. ➢ The program is projected to begin on April 1, 2002 -- first fiscal year has only six months of operations. ➢ Model used in making the budget projections (detailed in Attachment 4) is intended to show that the program can be achieved within what we proposed in April 2001. ■ Not intended to dictate specifics on how the clinic must operate. X96 J 2 ■Specifics on operation would be determined during competitive bidding for the services followed by negotiations and be fine -tuned in future years. ❖ Projecting annual cap of 7,000 enrollees by the 4th Fiscal Year (October 2004 to September 2005): ➢ The program's budget for the fourth year is less than the projection presented to the Board in April 2001. 16J 2 + Difference in April 2001 budget projection and current proposal. ➢ Originally viewed 7,000 enrolled as the first step to reaching 20,000 covered. ➢ Now: ■ Will ramp up to 7,000 by the 4th Fiscal Year. ■ 7,000 is the cap. ■ Lower number because: • Lowered eligibility from 200% to 150% of FPG. 16J 2 • No other successful program we studied reached more than 65% of its target population in any one year. • Other non - profit organizations will continue to treat some of the uninsured that we originally targeted. •'• Committee recommended paying primary care provider a flat fee based upon a negotiated "Cost Plus" approach rather than: ➢ Fee - for - service based on a percentage of Medicare or Medicaid rates. ➢ Capitation of the portion. primary 16J 2 care ❖ Please turn to the budget summary on page 11. SUMMARY OF PRO -FORMA BUDGETS FOR PRIMARY CARE OPERATIONS — FIRST FOUR FISCAL YEARS (FYs) 16J 2 KEY OPERATING STATISTICS: Enrolled Members Target Beginning of Time Period: 0 2,000 5,000 7,000 Midpoint of Time Period: 1,000 3,500 6,000 7,000 End of Time Period: 2,000 5,000 7,000 7,000 Number of Months in Time Period 6 12 12 12 Member Months In Time Period 6,000 42,000 72,000 84,000 Hours Open per Week: 40 60 60 60 COST CATEGORIES CLINIC OPERATION $323,000 $979 ,000 $1.369,000 $1,564 ,000 PHARMACEUTICAL PURCHASE $15,000 $105.000 $180,000 $210 ,000 PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION $122 ,000 $269,000 $347,000 $347,000 (Includes Program Mgt.,Tracking, Accountability, QA) TOTAL OPERATING COSTS $460,000 $1,353,000 $1.897.000 $2,122 ,000 (Without Start Up Costs) START UP CAPITAL Clinic $175,000 Pharmacy $10.000 Program Administration $45.000 TOTAL START UP CAPITAL $230.000 $0 $0 $0 ❖WILL DISCUSS FIRST YEAR AND �FIE 2 RAMPING THROUGH 4TH FISCAL _. ➢ Each year uses average of projected enrollment volume at beginning and end of the year. ➢ Clinic Operations costs varies upon: ■ Volume ■ Hours open: • 40 Hours / Week in first FY and 60 in second. 16J 2 •However, even in first FY hours will be shifted to have evening and weekend hours. ➢ Pharmaceutical cost will also vary based upon patient volume ■ 340B drug purchase is based on volume. ■ A pharmacy tech to do the compassionate drug arrangements are in clinic budget. ➢ Program administration: ■ Includes administrative staff and indirect costs to support the staff. 16J 2 - on., ■Number of eligibility clerks varies based upon volume and the number of hours open. ■ Tracking, accountability, and quality assurance (QA) varies based on volume and assumes that it is monitoring the work done within the clinic. ➢ In the first year, there will be one time start -up capital. 37 16J 2 ❖ SUMMARIZE THE TOTAL EXPENSES IN CURRENT DOLLARS: ➢ 1ST FY (Half Year) $700,000 includes start-up capital ($230,000) ➢ 2nd FY $1,350,000 ➢ 3rd FY $1,900,000 4th FY $21150,000 38 •'• Ramping and its impact on cost per 2 patient. Due to fixed costs and increased flexibility in staffing for higher volumes, the cost per patient in the earlier years is greater than in later years. This is typical for any business. ➢ The program must start somewhere and it does take a while to communicate its existence to users. 136J 2 ➢ In the first year, the systems will be developed, tuned. implemented, and fine- ❖ There is additional detail in Attachment 4 about the numbers. source of the budget 40 16J 2 ❖ ADDRESSING COMMUNITY CONCERNS -- Jim Tindall ❖ WRAP UP ➢ RECOMMENDATION: ■ FUND THIS PROGRAM. ■ SINCE THE FIRST YEAR IS ONLY 6 MONTHS, YOU NEED AT LEAST APPROVE THE FIRST 18 MONTHS TO EVALUATE THE PROGRAM. 16J 2 eft- ■ ONCE THE FUNDING IS APPROVED THEN THE NEXT STEPS ARE: • SELECT PRIMARY CARE PROVIDER AND NEGOTIATION, SUBSEQUENT CONTRACTING AND IMPLEMENTATION. *IMPLEMENT THE "WE CARE" SYSTEM: ♦ Recruit providers. physicians and other ♦ Put in place process and mechanisms for making referrals. • PUT IN PLACE PHARMACY 16J 2 PLAN. • PUT IN PLACE MECHANISM TO ADMINISTER THE PROGRAM INCLUDING CONTRACTING FOR A TPA. 16J 2 ❖ CLOSING COMMENTS ❖ Bottom line -- access is a huge problem. ➢ Most everyone agrees. ➢ The Board did when it appointed the second committee to find a solution. ➢ Our Committee made its conceptual recommendation last April. ..16J 2 •'• We identified that primary care was a critical part of the health care delivery system. ➢ There is a shortage of primary care providers in our community. ➢ Low - income people do not have ready access to primary care providers. •'• our solution was to create a public / private partnership to deliver primary care to our target population. r561 •'• At that point, we estimated $2.5M to provide services for 7,000 -- you agreed and voted to include this in next year's budget contingent on completion of details. + This morning, we shared the details with you: 1a M 0 Services to be covered. Who would be eligible? How care would be provided. a �6J 2 ➢ How the program would be governed and administered. ➢ Detailed budget for 4 fiscal years. ➢ Why we need to ramp up more slowly and begin later. •'• All of us must realize that the problem only worsens and cannot be solved without the County's financial support. + We believe that our recommendations are sound and represent a great value to the community. t? 47J 2 WE LOOK FORWARD TO YOUR QUESTIONS AND GAINING APPROVAL OF OUR RECOMMENDATIONS -- LET'S BEGIN TO SOLVE THE PROBLEM. 49 16,1 2 ESTIMATED NUMBER OF LOW - INCOME COLLIER COUNTY POPULATION THAT IS UNINSURED ................................. ............................. ............................... ......... �1LOF. ....................... D)SrRIC71�•' SSTINI. .F. . ' COL'LIER.COUNTY'PGPULA710N'.'. .'POP.ULATWN. .'POPLILATION•IN. .'.UNINSUREDAS'. . . .' COLUER.'.'.'. .:i4dd?At' IKV0 . . A.O'Fi'VPUTATjOjF : : .'4fl11►iS4NiEA.'.'.' IiELOYY200 %OF•'.' :':':':' IN'INCOMEL-EVEL' '. .IN- INC.DWL'EVEL ".' FEOEkL.P(VERTY.GUIDEUNE 0G)' . :WA4 . : f4 TO.64 •ol7. . .(. ) 1998 COLLIER COUNTY < 100% FPG 20,609 104%(@) 41.0%(b) 8,450 ( b Between 100% and 200% FPG 31.194 15_7% (a) 35.5% (b) 11.074 (b) < 200% FPG 51 803 26 2% (a) 119, Total Population 198,093 100.0% 2000 COLUER COUNTY < 100% FPG 26,153 10.4% (a) 41.0% (b) 10,723 8,578 Between 100% and 200% FPG 39 585 15_7 % (a) 35.5% (b) 14.053 11 242 < 200% FPG 65y37 26_2% (a) 24 775775 19_.820 Total Population (c) 251,377 NOTES: (a) The 1998 Collier percentage of total population at poverty level is utilized to estimate 2000 statistic. SOURCE: Clantas Estimates for Florida Department of Health (b) The 1998 uninsured rate by income level for District 14 (in which Collier is located) is utilized for 1998 and 2000 County estimates. SOURCE: Department of Health, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Data Analysis. (c) SOURCE: Department of Health, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Data Analysis. (d) It is estimated that 80% of uninsured are between 19 and 64 years old (20% are below 19 and over 65 is covered by Medicare.) Historic County and district data indicate the number of people from 100% to 150% of FPG is about the same as from 150% to 200 %. Therefore it is estimated that: People Below 150% FPG = People Below 100% FPG + 1/2 x People Between 100% FPG and 200% Attachment 2. 16,1 2 SCHEDULE OF PRIMARY CARE COVERED SERVICES (MUST BE THROUGH NETWORK PROVIDER) Physician Office Services Copayment per Visit $6.00 Routine Primary Adult Care (age 19 and over) Coverage includes: routine physical examinations, prostate exams, colon cancer screenings, gynecological exam, pap smear, mammogram, basic laboratory tests, health promotion and disease prevention activities, immunizations, diagnosis of acute conditions, medical management of chronic diseases, referral to specialists. Copayment per Visit (including all laboratory services) $6.00 Mammogram Frequency Schedule $6.00 Ages 35 through 39; one baseline Age 40 and after; one every year Routine Well Adult Care Limitations & Maximums Limited to 1 visit per Year per type of service (except as otherwise $6.00 defined in schedule) Diagnostic Testing, Lab Out patient Services (Basic) Included in office visit copay. Prescription Drug Benefit Dispensing fee to be paid to pharmacy for formulary drugs. To be (Maximum annual value of pharmaceuticals per person = $750) negotiated during bid process. Non - formulary drugs. I Not covered. 16J � 2 Attachment 3. SERVICES NOT COVERED IN PRIMARY CARE PROGRAM (WITH SOURCE OF CARE FOR INDIVIDUAL) Maternity Care Eligible for Medicaid Hospital Services — Inpatient Proposed to be part of We Care Pro Bono Services Hospital Services — Outpatient Proposed to be part of We Care Pro Bono Services Emergency Room - Hospital & Physician Services Proposed to be part of We Care Pro Bono Services Diagnostic Testing, X -ray & Lab Proposed to Hospital Based Services be part of We Care Pro Bono X -Rays, CAT Scans, CT Scans, MRI, Myocardial Studies, and Services Tomographic Studies Mental Disorders Alcoholism and/or Substance Abuse Proposed to be part of We Care Pro Bono Service or from Another Source 52 161 a SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FTE's w- 1 TT CLINIC Head Clerk 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Head Nurse 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Teams: Per Team: 1 PCP 1 Clinical 1 Clerk 3 TOTAL 1.0 3.0 2.5 7.5 4.5 13.5 5.5 16.5 Pharm.Tech 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Case Worker 1_0 1_5 1_5 1_5 TOTAL CLINIC 7.0 12.0 18.0 21.0 COUNTY Manager 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Clerical 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 Eligibility Clerks 1_0 2_5 3_5 3_5 COUNTY T 3_0 4_5 5_5 5_5 ¢O$$TAL Extramural Programs at the University of Florida College of Dentistry Frank Courts, D.D.S., Ph.D.; Nereyda Clark, D.M.D.; Theresa Dolan, D.D.S., M.P.H.; Frank Catalanotto, D.M.D. Dr. Courts is is Associate Professor and Chair of tho Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dr. Clark is Associate Professor in the Department of Operative Dentistry and Associate Dean for Extramural Programs, Dr. Dolan is Professor in the Department of Operative Dentistry and Associate Dean for Academic Affairs, and Dr. Catalanotto is Professor and Dean, all at the University of Florida. Direct correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Frank Courts, University of Florida, Department of Pediatric Dentistry, P.O. Box 1110426, Gainesville, FL. 32610 -0426; 352 - 392 -4131 phone; 352- 392 -8195 fax; fcourts (i)dental.ufl.edu e-mail. he University of Florida College of Dentistry (UFCD) is Florida's only state - supported den- tal college associated with a major research university. UFCD, located in the Dental Science Building at the University of Florida's Health Sci- ence Center, includes predoctoral, residency, and graduate education programs as well as a major re- search component. UFCD's extramural programs are an increasingly important component of the college's education and service missions. As the college plans to meet the challenges of the future, extramural pro- grams have the opportunity to play a critical role in the accomplishment of the college's major strategic goals. The objectives of UFCD's extramural programs include: • providing cost - effective community -based learn- ing experiences to predoctoral students; • increasing training opportunities for students pur- suing postdoctoral education; • providing oral health services to low- income and low- access populations; • encouraging practice in medically and dentally underserved rural and urban locations; • promoting a statewide presence for UFCD; and • promoting a working relationship between UFCD and dental and other health professionals in the state. UFCD operates three successful one -year post- graduate general dentistry training programs (GD) in Hialeah, Jacksonville, and St. Petersburg. Each site serves one or more of the following groups: the medi- cally needy, the indigent, minority populations, and the elderly. Each site has qualified specialist and gen- eral dentists teaching comprehensive care to pre- and postdoctoral students. These extramural locations were initiated with federal, state, and college funds and are currently self - supporting through state fund- 16J 2 ing and contracts for indigent care with state and lo- cal agencies. The Jacksonville program has incorpo- rated predoctoral student rotations and one -year postdoctoral general dentistry training programs. The Hialeah and St. Petersburg programs include ad- vanced education in general dentistry (AEGD) stu- dents as well as foreign- trained dental students en- rolled in a certificate program. This paper describes the history of the extramural program, current extra- mural program initiatives, extramural program ad- ministrative structure, and an evolving model for success of extramural programs. Evolution of UFCD Extramural Programs UFCD has a long history of involvement in extramural programs. UFCD's first extramural pro- gram began in 1974 in affiliation with the Mayo Clinic as a cooperative effort between the College of Dentistry and the Community of Mayo in Lafayette County, Florida. Federal grant funding supplemented the costs of building and equipping the clinic, and other costs were shared with the College of Medi- cine. The rotation was designed to provide dental stu- dents with a taste of practice in a rural community and to address the need for oral health care in underserved populations. The clinic proved to be extremely popular, both with the local community and with dental students, who often rated it their most rewarding clinical learning experience. While the relationship dissolved in the mid- 1980s, the notion that extramural programs could benefit the college's educational mission was firmly established. December 191)9 ■ Journal of Dental Education 951 A significant force for change in extramural education and service at UFCD was the Pew National Dental Educational Program. The University of Florida received both Phase 1 and Phase 2 awards. Strategic planning activities supported by that grant led to the development of a strategic planning goal focused on extramural outreach, namely to "Estab- lish a statewide extramural satellite network that will raise significantly the college's profile and accessi- bility as a state resource for dental education, re- search, and service." Three university -owned and - operated dental clinics grew out of the UFCD's Pew initiative. These clinics have challenged UFCD's ability to fund and operate extramural sites and have provided invalu- able experience as we look to develop future extra- mural partnerships. The geography and demographics of the coun- ties hosting our three extramural clinics are quite dif- ferent from those of Alachua, the county where the University of Florida is located. The extramural clin- ics are geographically distributed throughout the state and are located in larger urban areas than Gainesville. Duval, Pinellas, and Dade counties have larger popu- lations and higher per capita personal incomes than Alachua County. Pinellas County is home to many retirees, with about a quarter of the population over the age of sixty -five years. Less than 10 percent of county residents live below the poverty level, and 8.1 percent are African - American. In Dade and Duval counties about 15 percent of residents live below the poverty level, as does a higher proportion of minor- ity residents. The Jacksonville Dental Clinic was established in 1986. At its inception, this clinic trained four PGY I residents; three additional resident positions were added in 1995. The focus of this rotation includes experience with inner -city groups and medically com- promised populations. In addition to providing com- prehensive dental care to patients, the clinic also pro- vides emergency care to indigent and HIV - infected patient populations. Dental hygiene services are pro- vided by students enrolled in a local community col- lege hygiene program. Predoctoral student rotations began in October 1995. The Jacksonville Dental Clinic has an affiliation agreement with the L M. Sulzbacher Center for the Homeless, a shelter located in downtown Jacksonville, Duval County. Dental stu- dents provide comprehensive dental care at this lo- cation as part of their extramural experience. The local Area Health Education Center (AHEC) provides funding for student housing as well as reimburse- 16J 2 ment for transportation costs from Gainesville to Jacksonville. The St. Petersburg clinic was established in 1991. Because of the large number of elderly per- sons in Pinellas County, this clinic was originally intended to serve older adults. Howevc,r, Pinellas County already had a "geriatric" public health den- tal clinic, and so the University of Florida clinic evolved into one serving primarily low- income chil- dren and adults of all ages, persons with develop- mental disabilities, medically compromised patients, and patients infected with the HIV virus. Care is pro- vided by faculty, AEGD residents, and students en- rolled in the college's foreign - trained dentist certifi- cate program. Through an affiliation agreement with the St. Petersburg Junior College Dental Hygiene Program, residents serve as supervisors for dental hygiene students. Dental assisting students from a local vocational training school serve as dental as- sistants at the clinic. The Hialeah Dental Clinic, opened in Septem- ber 1997, provides oral health care to indigent popu- lations in the surrounding community and dental ser- vices through the rotation of AEGD residents and foreign - trained students to the Miami Jewish Home and I lospital for the Aged and Jackson Memorial Hospital. The area has a large Hispanic population, many migrant workers, Native Americans, and high - risk populations including HIV- positive /AIDS groups. This clinic serves as a primary clinical train- ing site for the college's Foreign Trained Dental Pro- gram. This program's two -year curriculum leads to licensure for dentists trained in programs that are not ADA- approved. The "Partners in Prevention" pro- gram, planned in conjunction with the Hialeah Den- tal Clinic, has started with participation in health fair/ youth career days throughout the year. A community - based dental sealant program began in January 1999 in collaboration with the Miami Children's Hospital and local dentists. New Directions in Extramural Programs By the early 1990s, the expansion o1' graduate programs, the initiation of the foreign - trained dental program, and the increased utilization of clinics by predoctoral students led to a severe limitation of clini- cal space at UFCD's Gainesville facility. An increase in clinical services was also constrained by a limited 952 Journal of Dental Education ■ Volume 6.3, No. 12 population base for both pre- and postdoctoral stu- dents. These factors, coupled with needs for more AEGD positions and a desire for a state -wide pres- ence as we] l as more community -based experiences, led UFCD into a second phase of extramural pro- gram development. In 1995, UFCD initiated the University of Florida Statewide Network for Community Oral Health. The mission of the oral health network is to "provide predoctoral and postdoctoral dental students with opportunities to learn and practice in interdis- ciplinary, community -based health care settings com- mitted to provide health care to Florida's underserved [populations]." This network is comprised of UFCD extramural facilities and a diverse mix of safety -net providers throughout the State of Florida. Safety -net providers include dental public health units, commu- nity health centers, and private not - for - profit organi- zations whose mission is to provide health care ser- vices to underserved segments of society. Table 1 summarizes the educational activities of the college's current extramural programs. Predoctoral students rotate to a total of three different sites from among a group of health care organizations including three community health center (CHC) sites, two Univer- sity of Florida facilities (the Jacksonville clinic and the Eastside Community Practice), one public health center, and one private not - for - profit health clinic within the state (ACORN). All students participate in oral health care appointments at the College of Dentistry. Currently, each third- and fourth -year student spends a total of twenty -two working days at extra- mural facilities. Participation in these activities pro- vides students with educational, service, and teach- ing opportunities in real world and multidisciplinary settings. Students gain experience and confidence in Table 1: Summary of UFCD extramural sites 1998 -99 UFCD - Owned Site Hialeah Jacksonville St. Petersburg UFCD Affiliated Sites 16J 2 a variety of clinical settings and provide dental care to underserved or low - access populations. Students evaluate the quality of these experiences in several ways, including post- rotation focus groups and writ- ten evaluations of the experience. Generally, the stu- dent feedback is extremely positive. Several students have chosen to practice in the areas of their rotations. Problems that have surfaced focus on the fact that some locations are too specialized: one clinic works primarily with emergency patients, another is not al- ways busy enough for students, and a third has too many pediatric cases. Another problem is that un- dergraduate students want to quantify the extramu- ral program experience as credits toward completion of their degree rather than regard it as an opportu- nity to fulfill personal and professional growth and maturation. Student and faculty feedback is used to modify educational experiences at each of the rota- tional sites. Future Postdoctoral Extramural Initiatives Beginning in July 1, 2000, the University of Florida College of Dentistry will initiate an AEGD program at CHC clinics located in Apopka, a Cen- tral Florida community. AEGD students taking ad- vantage of this general dentistry training opportu- nity will work with predoctoral students at these facilities. Patients are primarily migrant /seasonal workers and other low - income children and adults with limited access to oral health care. Emergency treatment will be scheduled daily; however, most treatment will be provided with the goal of achiev- ing and maintaining optimal oral health. Specialty Foreign- Trained Dental Dental AEGD GPR OMFS Pediatric Students Students Residents Residents Resdients Residents Externs X X X X X X X Marion County Health Dept., Ocala X Community t lealth Center, Apopka X Marion E. Fether, Immokalee X ACORN Clinic, Brooker X Miami Children's Hospital, Miami X Eastside Clinic, Gainesville X X X December 1999 ■ Journal of Dental Education 953 faculty will be recruited to provide instruction at the CHCs, and distance education technology will be utilized to provide education and interaction with Gainesville faculty and other general dentistry pro- grams in Hialeah, Jacksonville, and St. Petersburg. The development of a program in a CHC set- ting is an alternative to college -owned sites and pro- vides an opportunity for application of a cost -effec- tive and innovative method for educating general dentistry residents while concurrently providing oral health care to medically underserved populations. An affiliation agreement with the CHC helps fulfill the mission of providing oral health care services to underserved populations while providing students with a sense of community in real world settings. Developing community linkages through the forma- tion of GD programs in community health settings maximizes facility utilization at the extramural sites and decreases GD program start -up costs. It is ex- pected that through development of this first "non - owned" GD program, a blueprint will be created for initiating additional GD programs throughout the state while maintaining a coordinated and standard- ized didactic and clinical program for all GD loca- tions. Distance learning through video teleconferenc- ing as well as more traditional approaches such as videotapes and self -study guides are excellent ve- hicles for didactic instruction at extramural locations. In some locations, the communities served are un- able to support specialty faculty necessary for train- ing GD residents. Additionally, the locations cannot afford to hire teaching -only faculty because their missions are focused on the needs of their diverse populations. Distance learning technology, already being used in other GD locations, makes for excel- lent utilization of specialty faculty both in Gainesville and at other extramural locations. UFCD has invested heavily in the education of students at remote sites through the installation of state -of -the -art video tele- conferencing equipment at multiple locations in Florida. With the University of Florida Health Sci- ence Center Video Services unit, equipment has been purchased and the infrastructure put into place to secure interactive, efficient, and effective teaching opportunities for students in extramural locations. Students can interact with instructors and one an- other at a distance. Visual materials can include slides, computer - generated material, and images displayed from a document camera. 16J 2 A video bridge enables instructors and students to participate in multi -site conferences and makes it possible for instruction to take place at a given site and be received at any site. All residents meet weekly with University of Florida faculty for lectures, semi- nars, and literature reviews. Students rotate to Gainesville for special clinical courses; however, dis- tance education is the most viable option for semi- nars and didactic instruction. Use of distance learn- ing technology allows extramural locations to have interactive capabilities with specialty faculty and other residents while decreasing travel time for cur- rent faculty members and giving faculty the oppor- tunity to train and develop video teleconference course content. Extramural Program Administrative Structure UFCD recognized the need to implement, stan- dardize, and coordinate innovative extramural pro- grams and has done so through the appointment of the Associate Dean for Extramural Programs. An in- stitutional mandate spawned the development of the Division of Community -Based Programs, thus pro- viding an academic home for the adjunct and volun- teer faculty essential to the success of extramural programs. The Office of Extramural Programs has strengthened community linkages with various or- ganizations and has initiated several affiliation agree- ments to formalize the university's relationship with the community -based organizations. The responsi- bilities of the Office of the Associate Dean for Ex- tramural Programs include the overall administration and evaluation of extramural programs, budgeting, grant writing, selecting faculty and stall' for each site, developing standards for extramural program loca- tions, developing affiliations with community agen- cies, coordinating accreditation issues for extramu- ral program locations, serving as a liaison between organized dentistry and extramural program compo- nents, and standardizing and coordinating all educa- tional and clinical components of extramural program sites. The program director at each site is responsible for overseeing clinical education programs and pro- viding clinical dental experience opportunities. Pro- gram directors coordinate program schedules, recruit courtesy faculty for clinical supervision and educa- 954 Journal of Dental Education ■ Volume 63, No. 12 tional purposes, develop treatment planning seminars, and develop literature review programs for trainees. Other duties include providing clinical coverage, screening patients, providing coverage for emergency calls, evaluating trainees and other faculty and staff, and clinical quality assurance. Program directors are important liaisons in developing additional affilia- tions with community organizations such as county health departments, community colleges, community health facilities, not - for - profit hospitals, and other clinics offering services at no or little cost. Adjunct and courtesy faculty members provide specialty training and clinical supervision of students and GD residents. More importantly, these faculty serve as mentors, provide opportunities for associa- tion after program completion, and act as role mod- els for pre- and postdoctoral students. UFCD has advanced education programs in periodontics, prosthodontics, endodontics, pediatric dentistry, orthodontics, oral pathology, and oral and maxillofacial surgery. The postdoctoral core curricu- lum is developed by frill -time faculty and provided to trainees in these specialties. GD residents in re- mote locations view lectures by means of video tele- conferencing for didactic training. Specialty faculty from extramural sites also provide additional train- ing for all GD sites through distance learning educa- tional media, thus ensuring the standardization and coordination of all material presented to program participants. To ensure cooperation of the professional den- tal community, a Joint Committee on Extramural Programs (JCEP) with the Florida Dental Associa- tion (FDA) was established in 1998. JCEP is com- prised of three FDA members and three faculty mem- bers from UFCD including the Associate Dean for Extramural Programs. This committee is advisory to the College of Dentistry and has been useful in set- ting policies regarding extramural educational activi- ties that are consistent with the strategic goals of the college and are sensitive to the concerns of organized dentistry. This committee has developed a mecha- nism for the development and implementation of new extramural programs and methods to assess the qual- ity of the educational experience. Some of this infor- mation may be found in the guidelines for the devel- opment of predoctoral and postdoctoral extramural programs developed by JCEP (Appendixes 1 and 2). Both processes have been approved by the FDA and UFCD. The partnership with the state dental asso- 16J 2 ciation was an important step toward the long -term success of UFCD's extramural programs. Florida Model for Extramural Program Development The development of cost - effective extramural programs of high quality presents a formidable chal- lenge to UFCD. To meet it, we are forming partner- ships with groups and institutions with whom we have not been traditionally aligned. These partners include community colleges, community health centers, pub- lic health units, philanthropic organizations, and other groups that function as safety net providers. Other important partners are private practitioners and or- ganized dentistry. Such partnerships, despite the var- ied roles and missions of the participants, promise to benefit not only UFCD but all other participants. The guidelines for extramural programs delin- eate the mission, goals, and specific responsibilities of the partners. UFCD is responsible for the core education, including: a distance learning linkage, resident recruitment, program administration, ac- creditation, quality assurance, and outcomes assess- ments. In return, UFCD receives a cost - effective ex- tramural experience of high quality for students and residents. Community dental clinics provide clinic infrastructure, patients, and a qualified clinical fac- ulty or resident program director. In return, safety net providers receive licensed providers at a minimal cost and an affiliation with an institution recognized for excellence. Community dentists and the FDA provide mentors and clinical teachers and also serve as community advocates. These dentists are provided an opportunity to participate in indigent care, a fac- ulty appointment at UFCD, and a link to continued professional growth. Students and residents receive valuable learning opportunities and become net- worked to a community. Relationships with clinical and volunteer faculty can lead to additional profes- sional opportunities, including employment in these facilities or private practice associateships. This cooperative model permits the college to enhance pre- and postdoctoral education and to suc- cessfully compete for state funding to assist in the delivery of indigent care. Resident eligibility for Graduate Medical Education finding makes these programs especially attractive and provides the op- December 1999 ■ Journal of Dental Education 955 portunity to initiate programs that can be expected Acknowledgment to move quickly toward a self - supporting financial g position. Preparation of this article was supported in part by a grant from the Josiah Macy Jr. Foundation, "Community Practice Model of Clinical Dental Edu- cation: A Feasibility Study." Appendix 1 GUIDELINES FOR EXTRAMURAL PREDOCTORAL STUDENT PROGRAMS Rationale This program facilitates the educational experience as well as the personal and professional development and maturation of the University of Florida College of Dentistry (UFCD) student. The progra►n provides an opportunity for predoctoral students to participate in community service depending upon the locale. Each extra- mural rotation will include interaction with other health care professionals and patients, particularly those with low income and poor access to oral health care. Stipulations and Standards The curricular design of the education and community service component of the program will be dcveloped by the UFCD with input from the Clinic /Program Site Director. The educational and community service compo- nents of the dental student rotation will be implemented by the Clinic /Program Site Director. The fiscal responsi- bility and management of the extramural program site remains with the clinic and not with UFCD. The extramural program site must be committed to providing quality dental services to patients as well as a quality educational environment for dental students. Clinic faculty, including appointed courtesy faculty, who interact with dental students rotating to the extra- mural site must understand and apply rotation learning objectives. Such learning objectives will be consistent with the UFCD clinical education program objectives. Clinical education assessments and evaluative criteria (clinical competency statements) established for dental students will be standardized to the UFCD faculty. The Clinic /Program Site Director will attend annual standardization sessions with appropriate clinical departments. The Clinic /Program Site Director will convey the standards to the faculty at the site. The overall program will provide a range of patient care experiences. This program will also provide an opportunity for the dental student to develop interpersonal and managerial skills with dental auxiliaries and office support staff. Assessment UFCD will periodically assess program outcomes. The assessments include (but are not limited to): • student satisfaction with the educational experience; • patient satisfaction with the dental care provided; • faculty evaluation of the student's dental experience; and • community and /or service experience. UFCD will also evaluate the Clinic /Program Site Director's satisfaction of the above criteria. Quality Assurance Each extramural program site will be visited annually, or more often, depending upon the outcome assess- ments. These visits will ensure that the quality of the extramural learning experience is maintained. The Extramural Programs Quality Assurance Team will be assembled by the Office of Extramural Pro- grams to perform the site visits. The committee will be comprised of faculty from UFCD and members of the FDA /UFCD Joint Committee on Extramural Programs (JCEP). Representatives from the Extramural Program 956 Journal of Dental Education ■ Volume 63, No. 12 16J 2 Quality Assurance Team will convene prior to the site visit to discuss the site visit and review the questionnaire. Following the site visit, the team will generate a report of the site visit results. The Associate Dean for Extramural Programs will generate a Corrective Action Plan (CAP), if necessary, based upon the results of the site visit and other previously identified assessments. The Associate Dean for Extramural Programs presents the report to the Curriculum Committee at the UFCD and the Quality Assurance Team. Appendix 2 GUIDELINES FOR EXTRAMURAL POSTDOCTORAL STUDENT PROGRAMS Rationale The continually expanding didactic and clinical knowledge base for general dental practitioners demands that dental graduates meet this challenge. To develop the skills and knowledge base required to become a success- ful practitioner, dental students need a transition period. University of Florida College of Dentistry (UFCD) graduates must enter the professional health care market as successful and highly competent dentists who practice dentistry of high quality in their communities. It is the responsibility of UFCD to provide advanced education programs to general dentistry graduates who are, more frequently, demanding the opportunity to excel in their profession through participation in advanced education programs. Advisory Committee Each extramural postdoctoral program will have a local advisory committee that will provide support, guid- ance, and participation to our postdoctoral students and assure the quality of the extramural program. These local practitioners are vital to the success of the extramural postdoctoral student program. Criteria Each program must meet or exceed the Commission on Dental Accreditation Standards for AEGD /GPR programs. Each extramural site must have sufficient faculty to meet the demands of the program. A community support structure for the extramural program will include the local practicing dental commu- nity, local hospitals, and local health care and social service agencies. Each extramural site will have a program director whose qualities include the following: • excellent clinical skills; • demonstrated fiscal management skills; • strong interpersonal and communication skills; and • demonstrated ability to work with the local community. Each extramural site will have access to a diverse population and will preferably have an affiliation with a local hospital. The program will remain financially viable as it delivers high - quality, comprehensive dental care. Program sites will be selected according to the "Site Selection Process." Assessment UFCD will periodically assess program outcomes. The assessments include (but are not limited to): • postdoctoral student satisfaction with the educational experience; • patWnt satisfaction with the dental care provided; and • faculty /clinic director evaluation of the postdoctoral student's dental experience. UFCD will also evaluate the Program Director's fulfillment of the above criteria. December 1999 ■ Journal of Dental Education 957 16J 2 Quality Assurance Each extramural program site will be visited annually or more often, depending upon the outcome assess- ments. These visits will ensure that the quality of the extramural learning experience is maintained. The Extramural Programs Quality Assurance Team will be assembled by the Office of Extramural Programs to perform the site visits. The committee will be composed of faculty from UFCD knowledgeable about the AEGD /GPR curriculum, a representative of the local Dental Advisory Committee, and members of the FDA/ UFCD Joint Committee on Extramural Programs (JCEP). Representatives from the Extramural Program Quality Assurance Team will convene prior to the site visit to discuss the site visit and review the questionnaire. Following the site visit, the team will generate a report of the site visit results. The Associate Dean for Extramural Programs will generate a Corrective Action Plan (CAP), if necessary, based upon the results of the site visit and other previously identified assessments. The Associate Dean for Extra- mural Programs will present the report to the UFCD Advanced Education Committee and the Quality Assurance Team. 958 journal of Dental Education ■ Volume 63, No. 12 Health Ca re Review Committee I FinalRepon September 2000 16J 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary 1 Introduction 24 History 25 Subcommittee Reports 29 Uninsured 33 Mental Health and Substance Abuse Children's Health 43 Elderly 50 Dental 58 Models That Work 61 Functions, Powers and Duties of the Health Care Planning and Finance Committee 69 Committee Members and Advisors 70 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION: 16,1 2 In May 1999 the Board of County Commissioners formed an ad hoc Collier County Health Care Review Committee to review existing health care systems in Collier County, determine if adequate access and health care is available to all residents, and submit a report of its findings and recommendations. The full Committee met monthly since July 1999, examining the existing health care systems in place and reviewing options for correcting gaps found. The members met more frequently in subcommittees formed to explore specific population subsets (children, the underinsured, and the elderly), facets of health services (dental and mental health and substance abuse), and other successful local community programs .(models). Committee members reviewed much pertinent material available and met with numerous knowledgeable health care providers and other community leaders. The Committee recognizes that the subject of access to health care is an extremely complex issue. The Committee has concluded that access to the health care delivery system by insured and other middle to high- income residents is in sharp contrast to the limited access by uninsured and underinsured individual residents with low incomes. The Committee recognizes and appreciates the great efforts of the private sector in Collier County to care for the health care needs of the indigent and underinsured. This includes concerned citizens, NCH Healthcare Systems, the Cleveland Clinic, physicians and, other health care providers. Their combined efforts have also resulted in numerous charitable organizations focusing on various health care needs of the indigent, supported by extensive philanthropy from an extremely generous community. Despite all this, however, significant gaps in access to health care remain and continue to worsen. While recognizing there is a responsibility to secure all available sources of funding possible, the Committee concludes that, without a safety net provided by county government in some form, present and future health programs for the indigent will not achieve the desired results. County demographics reveal that our community is, indeed, a culturally and economically diverse population with a wide range of economic means. There are the better -known populations that include large numbers of affluent working and retired people and a narrow middle class. Collier County is also home to a large number of working poor, migrant workers, and other indigents (e.g. homemakers who no longer have husbands to support them, skilled workers with unexpected disabilities and owners of small businesses with poor earnings) who have a greater 16J z probability of being underinsured or uninsured. To cite just one example of the magnitude of this low- income population, 43% of the children in the Collier County School District are eligible for free or reduced cost lunches. Florida's Agency for Health Care Administration (AHCA) conducted an extensive health insurance survey throughout the state in 1999. Its summary report documented that in the 3 county area of Charlotte, Collier and Lee Counties, almost 1 in every 5 (or 19.8 %) of the population under 65 is without insurance, the third worst rate of uninsured of all such districts in the entire state. The report also revealed that approximately 35% of our residents under 65 earning less than 150% of the federal poverty level (see table below) were uninsured and this percentage grows to 41 % for residents earning less than 100% of FPL. Just recently AHCA released additional information from this study at the county level; it shows Collier County's uninsured rate for persons under age 65 is 18 %, or almost 30,000 individuals. About 6,500 of these live in Immokalee. Year 2000 Federal Poverty Levels Family 100% 150% Size* Federal Poverty Levels Federal Poverty Levels Annual Monthly Hourly Annual Monthly Hourly 1 $8,350 $696 $4.01 $12,525 $1,043 $6.02 2 $11,250 $938 $5.41 $16,875 $1,406 $8.11 3 $14,150 $1,179 $6.80 $21,225 $1,768 $10.20 4 $17,050 $1,421 $8.20 $25,575 $2,131 $12.29 5 $19,950 $1,663 $9.59 $29,925 $2,493 $14.38 6 $22,850 $1,904 $10.99 $34,275 $2,856 $16.47 7 $25,750 $2,146 $12.38 $38,625 $3,218 $18.56 8 $28,650 $2,388 $13.77 $42,975 $3,581 $20.66 "For family households with more than 8 members, add $2,900 to annual income per additional member to find 100% of poverty levels and $4,350 for 150 %. The Community Health Status Report compiled by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services in July, 2000 reveals that 12% of Collier County's population is below the poverty level. With a total population this year estimated at 227,000, there are approximately 27,000 documented persons with incomes at this lowest level. However, the county is home to many persons who avoid being counted, e.g., migrant field, service, and workers and homeless people. The great majority of these groups are not only uncounted, but their income is almost always below the poverty level. Thus, the total population is most likely somewhat higher than 227,000 and the percentage of the population below the poverty level would be higher than 12 %. It is also unknown how many residents have incomes falling V, 16,1 2 between 100 and 150 percent of the level (another group at high risk of having no access to health care). Together, these statistics reflect almost 30,000 uninsured county residents and much more than 27,000 residents with incomes below 150% of federal poverty levels. It must be noted that not all lower income individuals are without insurance and not all those without insurance are lower income individuals. Indeed, it is the working poor who, for the most part, are most significantly impacted by the high cost or lack of employer -based group health insurance. Data provided to the Committee reflect that while those working poor who are in need of greater access to health care are spread geographically throughout the entire county, they tend to be concentrated in three specific geographic areas within Collier County — East Naples, Golden Gate and Immokalee. These areas contain a significant "working class" population, many of whom are underinsured. Although some of the health care needs of the people living in these clusters are being met, significant gaps in access to adequate care exist in the areas of primary care, specialty care, mental health, dental health, and vision care. Because most of the medically indigent have no access point to the health care system, their medical problems are not quantified by any organization and are impossible to document. However, many of the Committee members are exposed daily to a considerable amount of anecdotal evidence of their need and suffering. Mike Smith's* story is a good example. "Mike" is forty - something, divorced, and lives in a trailer. He is a barber who supplements his income by doing yard work on his days off. He has diabetes and hypertension, and over the past few years has had increasing weight gain. He has no insurance and a low income despite his two jobs. After three years without health care, Mike learned of the Neighborhood Health Clinic where volunteers treat working adults for the price of one hour's wages. One recent Monday night he sought the clinic's help. Mike really wants to feel better so when the doctor suggested he get some exercise, he found a way to do it. The following Saturday morning he fell while riding a bike and hurt his shoulder. Since the clinic would not open again until Monday night, his shoulder went untreated. He still had bills to pay, however, and went to his "side job" as a gardener. Mike fell again on his injured arm; this time he fractured his elbow and was bit by wasps on the same arm. Despite intense pain, he could not afford medical care and would not incur an emergency room bill he would be unable to pay. He continued to wait for treatment until the Neighborhood Health Clinic opened Monday night. 'Not his real name The inability to access basic primary care places a huge strain -on the people in need. It also strains those organizations that attempt to provide them with some 3 16J 2 manner of care. The financial burden placed on the organizations providing the resources are, in turn, passed on to the rest of the population of Collier County, either directly or indirectly. Consequences to the community include loss of productivity when employees' untreated medical conditions become so severe that they cannot work and financial loss to a variety of individuals and businesses when they can no longer pay their debts. It is especially costly in terms of unnecessary, uncompensated use of the emergency room and other inpatient and outpatient services that would not have been necessary had the person received treatment in an earlier, more easily treated stage of the disease. The costs for this care are ultimately passed on to the rest of the population through higher health care prices and increased insurance rates. The history of David Jones* and the emergency room illustrates how this happens. "David" is self - employed with insulin - dependent diabetes. His income is quite low; since he owns his business he is not eligible for group health insurance and he cannot afford to buy an insurance policy for himself. He also cannot afford the price of doctor visits and medication. Without insulin, David's blood sugar gets too high; he may go into diabetic acidosis and must receive emergency room care to stabilize his condition. He is then given a limited amount of insulin. When the insulin runs out he again becomes hyperglycemic and must return once again to the emergency room. The costs for these frequent emergency room visits quickly mount and David cannot pay for them. They become part of the "bad debt" or charity care that the hospital shifts to consumers by raising its rates. Higher hospital rates cost both the private paying patients and the insurance companies, which the insurance companies recoup by increasing their premiums. *Not his real name. If David were able to receive medical care and insulin on a regular basis, as insured diabetics do, he would not require use of the emergency room and the cost to the community would be only the price of his medication and periodic doctors visits, both at substantially reduced rates. An "uncompensated care" study of NCH Healthcare Systems conducted in 1999 by Fraser and Mohlke Associates, Inc. documented the extent of charity care provided by NCH in 1998. Charity care, in this case, generally reflects write -offs when a patient's bill is more than a third of the annual family income. According to the report, the hospitals provided over $18 million worth of such charity care to inpatients and outpatients in 1998. The unreimbursed care incurred by the hospital for uninsured, low- income patients who did not meet this stringent criterion is considered to be dramatically higher but extremely difficult to separate from other bad debts. 4 16J 2 CURRENT RESOURCES: Medically indigent people in Collier County are not entirely bereft of health care resources. Indeed, the following paragraphs show a variety of access points and services available to those who cannot afford to pay for care. It must be noted, however, that there are many limitations to the treatment these entities can provide to the populations eligible to receive their services. As the previously noted study by Fraser and Mohlke points out, Naples Community Hospital provides a substantial amount of uncompensated care. Some of this uncompensated care is incurred as charity costs, when patients' bills are higher than a third of their annual income. Other uncompensated care is considered to be bad debt, when uninsured patients simply can't or won't pay their hospital bills. In addition, some hospital care is offered free of charge to indigent patients of the Neighborhood Health Clinic. Unreimbursed hospital charges are not the only services provided to indigent patients within the hospital. Each patient also receives free or low cost medical care from at least one physician. The emergency room of Naples Community Hospital is the first choice for any type of medical care for many indigent people. The hospital is required by law to triage (diagnose) all those who present themselves and to provide care for all true emergencies. However, because of its justified concern over litigation, NCH, as all hospitals, generally provides some level of care for nearly all who seek it. As a result, some indigents look upon the emergency room as others view their private doctors' offices. Use of the emergency room is extremely expensive. Inappropriate emergency room visits such as these drive up costs for everyone as well as clog the system for true emergency patients. In addition, mandated follow -up care for indigent emergency room patients is limited, and many never return to a healthy status for any length of time. Collier Health Services, Inc. (CHSI), a partially federally funded organization, may be the most heavily utilized source for low cost health care in Collier County. CHSI and its affiliates, Marion E. Fether Medical Center, the Immokalee Family Care Center, and Isabel Collier Read Children's Health Network offer a wide range of health services on a sliding fee scale. Services include family medicine, pediatrics, women's health, dental health, chronic and infectious diseases, and adult health care. The majority of CHSI facilities and services are in Immokalee. R 16J 2 A review of CHSI's payment sources in 1998 reveals that 32% of children's services and 62% of adult services provided were to uninsured, indigent patients. The assessment also showed that 59% of patients (24,000) had incomes at or below 100% of the federal poverty level, 8% of patients' (3,000) incomes were between 101% and 150% of the poverty level, and 2% (600) were between 151% and 200 %. Of the 41,000 unduplicated patients receiving care through CHSI in 1998, 43% were migrant/seasonal farm workers. The Senior Friendship Center operates a low cost medical and dental clinic in Old Naples. Retired doctors and dentists who volunteer their time and skills provide health services four days a week. No one is turned away due to an inability to pay. However, there is a waiting list and not every indigent person is eligible for services at Senior Friendship Center. Eligibility requirements are that patients be at least 50 years of age and have an annual income of $14,500 or less for a single person, and $19,500 for a couple. In the past year, volunteer physicians and dentists at the Senior Friendship Center provided 2100 medical and dental visits. The Neighborhood Health Clinic, which opened its doors at Grand Central Station in April 1999, was founded by a retired doctor and his wife, a former nurse. They have been strongly supported by local doctors and the NCH Health Care System. The clinic is staffed entirely by volunteer health care professionals (doctors, nurses, physical therapists and others) and "lay volunteers" with the assistance of a paid coordinator. Volunteer doctors at the Neighborhood Health Clinic treat indigent patients two evenings per week and on Saturday mornings. It is a "first come, first served" walk -in clinic that provides primary care to uninsured working adults with incomes at or below 150% of the poverty levels and who are not receiving governmental assistance. When patients need specialty care that cannot be provided in the clinic, they are referred to volunteer specialists' private offices and /or to Naples Community Hospital. Each clinic visit costs the patient just one hour's wage; referred visits to specialists and the hospital are provided free of charge. From the time the clinic opened through the end of June 2000, there were 2,300 patient visits, with each clinic session generally treating between 25 and 30 patients. The estimated value of these services is in excess of $720,000. The Collier County Health Department has two primary sites, one in Naples and the other in Immokalee. While the Department no longer provides primary care services, it does provide many programs in areas such as epidemiology and communicable disease control, rabies, health education, Women, Infants and Children (WIC), and environmental health serving all county residents and visitors. In addition, the Department serves as a broker for many other health care services such as obstetrics and family planning, school health, and healthy kids programs. Programs that provide direct health care services are: n 16,1 ;) • Tuberculosis and sexually transmitted disease screening, diagnosis and treatment • HIV anonymous and confidential testing • HIV /AIDS patient care and case management • School and flu immunizations and medication response to specific disease outbreaks • Services for pregnant women and children up to age three, including care coordination, nutrition counseling, childbirth education, parenting education and support, smoking cessation counseling, follow -up of substance exposed newborns, field nursing and home visits The Foundation for Women's Health, a public /private partnership of the Collier County Health Department, local obstetricians and Naples Community Hospital, is a system of prenatal care open to all pregnant women in Collier County referred by the health department, CHSI clinic, Medicaid and for all other pregnant women for whom no other funding source is available through public, private or personal resources. Services include prenatal, delivery, and postnatal services through the professional provider staff and resources of local, private sector, board certified obstetricians, the NCH Healthcare System, and the Collier County Health Department. This is probably the most successful local public /private health care partnership. Since this organization was established in 1999, numbers of patients seen have increased, administrative costs have decreased, and a much higher percentage of "eligible- for - Medicaid" individuals have been enrolled in Medicaid. The David Lawrence Center provides inpatient and outpatient mental health care to uninsured, low- income patients but over the years the funding has decreased while the need increased. The recent closing of Charter Glade Hospital in Fort Myers and the impending closing of G. Pierce Wood Hospital in Arcadia may bring the lack of mental health care for this population to a crisis level. Already, the patients being treated at David Lawrence Center are sicker than in the past, and the agency is increasingly providing completely uncompensated care. Emergency beds are not always available to meet the need, and at times mattresses are placed on the floor for patients due to the increased demand. Some health care programs are funded totally or partially by the state or federal government to help meet some of the needs of disadvantaged children, including Medicaid and KidCare /Healthy Kids. However, there are significant impediments to getting all eligible children enrolled in these programs and in finding adequate numbers of physicians and dentists to care for the children who are enrolled. Further, while these programs concentrate on school age children, they seem to underserve adolescents. In prior years inadequate required local matching dollars forced over 1,000 children to be put on a waiting list. Recent state legislation has 7 16J 2 temporarily resolved this by freezing local match and providing state funds to enroll more children throughout the state. Now there is an urgent need for increased local outreach efforts to enroll as many as possible eligible children for these programs before state enrollment caps are reached. The Cleveland Clinic is a recent addition to outpatient health services in Collier County. It contributes $150,000 annually to the Healthy Kids local match and $120,000 annually to fund a physician at Collier Health Services, Inc. in Immokalee, and conducts immunization clinics for school children. In addition, some of Cleveland Clinic's physicians volunteer at the Neighborhood Health Clinic. It currently offers physician and outpatient services and expects to open a 70 bed hospital in early 2001. Many local physicians contribute a great deal of time, energy and expertise to returning the uninsured to better health by volunteering their services to organized efforts aimed at assisting the less fortunate. At times, they also provide free care to established patients who encounter financial difficulties during the course of their treatment. When these donated efforts are combined with the pro bono care physicians give to hospital patients and indigent patients referred by other physicians, their service to the community is invaluable. In 1998, in a joint effort between the Collier County Health Department and the Collier County Medical Society, a survey of a representative sample of medical society physician members was conducted relative to their uncompensated services. The median total estimated amount of uncompensated health care provided per respondent was $36,000 for calendar year 1997 with a wide variation. To the extent that this median amount is accurate for the entire physician community in Collier County, it is estimated that the 400 doctors donated $14,400,000 worth of free care in 1997. Beginning with its opening in 1999, the Neighborhood Health Clinic has provided an additional avenue for community- minded physicians to serve the less fortunate that did not exist at the time of the survey. Ancillary health businesses, such as radiology centers, provide free and low cost services to uninsured, low income patients referred through the Neighborhood Health Clinic and American Cancer Society. In addition, many non - profit agencies in Collier County aid the health of numerous indigent persons as part of their overall service missions. Specific examples of these efforts are Catholic Charities (which pays licensed therapists to treat poor persons), Lutheran Ministries (a health resource for children), and the American Cancer Society (which provides free mammograms to low income women and 9 16J 2 makes arrangements for free follow -up with further testing and treatment by generous physicians). The school nurse program is a vehicle by which family health education and linkage to the community health care system could take place. However, in Collier County there are only thirteen nurses serving thirty -four schools and 32,400 students, with a ratio of one nurse to 2,500 students. The national recommended ratio is one nurse to 750 students and the state goal is one nurse for every 1500 students. For the first time last year, the school nurse program was able to provide some level of school nurse time to all public schools. Thirty -two of the schools received 8 to 10 hours of nursing time per week and two middle schools received a full -time nurse 5 days a week. In addition to managing emergency health situations, nurses are uncovering many health problems in the school age population. However, they often find it difficult to find referral sources within the community for these students. Funding for this program comes from the Collier County Health Department, NCH Health Care System, and Collier County Public Schools and Collier County Government; a substantial portion of this funding may be in jeopardy beyond the current school year. Medicare generally is satisfactory for most hospital services, physician services and short-term nursing home stays for the elderly and some disabled individuals. However, health care costs are a growing expenditure for the elderly. Nationally, persons over age 65 represent 13% of the population but incur 35% of all health care costs. Due to the large elderly population in Collier County, the impact is even greater here. Pharmacy costs not covered by Medicare continue to mount, further aggravating the situation. BARRIERS TO CARE: Costs Most county residents have the means to pay for their health care through private insurance, Medicare, Medicaid, or from their own personal resources. As noted earlier, however, a significant number of persons in Collier County are either uninsured or underinsured and are financially unable to pay for health care for themselves and their children. In general, these individuals are working class men and women between the ages of 19 and 64, often having incomes lower than 150% of the federal poverty level. Many are self - employed or have jobs with small businesses that do not provide health insurance for their employees (or, if they do, the costs to employees are unaffordable). 9 16J 2 Unfortunately, in Collier County these people often receive little or no health care at all. Those who do obtain periodic treatment frequently obtain it far too late, when the illness or injury is much worse and the treatment costs are much greater. Further, these patients often lack access to follow -up care due to a variety of reasons ranging from a lack of funds for prescriptions and /or specialty care to a lack of transportation. Data provided by Naples Community Hospital and Collier Health Services, Inc. indicate that most "charity care "costs are generated by those between the ages of 19 and 64. For example, in 1998, over 93% of NCH's in- patient charity care costs were incurred treating patients between the ages of 18 and 64. This was also true for each of the four previous years. And, in 1998, 89% of NCH's out - patient charity care costs were incurred for this same age group. This most likely relates to their generally being excluded from government assistance for medical care. Unless documented as disabled by the federal government, individuals cannot obtain Medicare until they are 65 years of age. Medicaid, the other government program that is generally thought to provide a medical safety net for poor people, is designed in Florida to assist only children, the elderly and disabled. Non - elderly and non - disabled indigent adults can only receive Medicaid when they can show that their ill health will have a negative impact on children in their custody. However, many of the people in this age group either have never been parents or do not have custody of their children, or their children are older than 17. Further, uninsured non - citizens working in low- paying jobs such as seasonal work in fields, restaurants, and the like are not eligible for health services through governmental funding, even if they do meet the other criteria for government programs. Although members of this population are most highly visible in Immokalee, low- income non - citizens live and work throughout the county. Mental health and substance abuse services for the uninsured and under - insured in Collier County have been limited by a variety of factors. However, this group is definitely in need of these services, as evidenced by Naples Community Hospital's report that 35% to 40% of its psychiatric patients are indigent. Further, during its fiscal 1999 year, the David Lawrence Center opened nearly 11,000 cases of which 91 % were at or below the federal poverty level, Ten years ago, this statistic was only 60 %. Governmental, public and private sources of funds to meet the needs of people seeking mental health and substance abuse interventions have not, and will not, keep pace with the growing demand. Financial resources provided by the State of Florida for mental health are primarily targeted toward individuals at risk of institutional care. Fewer public dollars are spent in prevention and education. The increasing need is already outstripping our current community resources as indicated by increasing waiting lists and delays for those seeking care. Anticipated is an increasing demand for emergency mental health and substance abuse intervention, increases in associated crime and incarceration, and subsequent ius 16J 2 overload of community institutions such as hospitals and law enforcement systems. The ultimate impacts are on the mentally ill and the taxpayer. Even those who have some type of third -party payer may not have adequate health services if their income is low. For example, Medicare doesn't cover costs of many preventative services (i.e., routine physician examinations, tetanus immunizations, routine cholesterol /blood sugar levels), medication, prescription glasses or dental care. While this is not problematic for people who can pay for these services themselves, it can place the health and even the lives of impoverished elderly persons at risk. Medicaid also places limits on health services, such as extremely restricted dental coverage for adults. Further, long -term care has very limited funding -- Medicare reimbursement is sparse, and patients must first exhaust their personal resources, including savings and other assets, before Medicaid funding begins. Access /Availability Collier County covers a large geographic area. This makes availability of health care a challenge as there are pockets of populations in the county that do not have close access to health services, e.g., Everglades City and East Naples. The distance between these areas and sections of the county with health care providers is aggravated by the lack of public transportation for those without reliable automobiles of their own. Many health care providers are available for routine office hours only during the working day. While the lack of . evening and/or Saturday services may be problematic for many working people, it can cause major financial difficulties for the working poor whose jobs do not allow time off during the workday to attend to their own or their children's health care needs. This encourages the use of the emergency room, the most expensive alternative, as the provider of choice because it is always open and people know they will not be refused care. Access to dental care is a particularly dim situation for low- income persons, even those who qualify for Medicaid. When the patients are adults, Medicaid pays only for single tooth extractions when it is an emergency condition or full mouth extractions and one set of dentures per lifetime. Although Medicaid has comprehensive coverage for children's dental needs, only one private dentist in the county and the Marion E. Fether Medical Center in Immokalee accept Medicaid reimbursement. Statistics from the Florida Department of Health's Division of Planning and Evaluation indicate that in 1998, only 24% of Collier County's low - income (below 100% of federal poverty level) residents had access to dental care, down from 26% in 1997 and 30% in 1996. When the poverty level is increased to 200 %, access to dental care plummets to 9 %. 11 16,1 2 Principally due to financial considerations, poor dental health is rampant among the low- income population. Cavities and other dental problems are ignored as long as possible. Residents of Greater Naples often seek dental care at Marion E. Fether Medical Center in Immokalee, despite the distance involved — usually a 40 to 60 minute drive each way -- because it is the only source of low cost dental care in the county for people under 50 years of age. Because dental infections must be resolved with antibiotics before any actual dental work can be performed, Collier County residents who are in pain may spend up to two hours on the road to and from Marion E. Fether's dental clinic and an undetermined amount of time in the waiting room, only to leave with just a prescription and an appointment for a future date. When their transportation difficulties and unpaid time off from work are factored in, the Immokalee dental visit becomes quite expensive and is perceived as inadequate. It is difficult for many indigent individuals to receive mental health services in Collier County. There are long waiting lists for publicly funded care, treatment and follow - up services, and severe limits on the availability of dollars to increase such services. Public funds are usually reserved for children and those most at risk, rather than helping people before they get so sick they require institutionalization. There are only 32 psychiatric hospital beds in Collier County, 20 at Naples Community Hospital and 12 at the David Lawrence Center. Ideally there should be 22 crisis beds in the community; in reality there are just 12. People must sometimes be sent to other crisis units out of the county and away from their families and support systems. . The recent loss of Charter Glade Hospital in Fort Myers and the impending closing of G. Pierce Wood, the area's only state institution for the mentally ill, will only exacerbate the problem of providing care to this vulnerable population. At times a child's illness is discovered at school. When students are from insured, middle and upper income families, it is a simple matter for the school to phone the parents, who then arrange to take their child to the doctor. It is not so easy to help a child whose parents do not have immediate access to health care for their children. In addition, there is a severe shortage of full time school health nurses in county schools available to provide linkage to the community health care system, even when there is an access point for the child. Knowledge The culturally diverse population locally presents many healthcare challenges, including health education. Some people are new to the United States and some haven't kept current with research findings related to how to best care for oneself. Many parents are unaware of recommended health care schedules and routine "well child" care such as immunizations and preventive health maintenance. Education of 12 families from varying cultures is critical in assurinc remain healthy and receive routine care. There is also a general lack of knowledge among about the few resources that are available to them. 16J 2 that children, as well as adults, the medically indigent population By reviewing printed material, conducting interviews, and holding discussions among each subcommittee and the full Committee, members came to the conclusion that, other than for occasional waits for certain types of care, people in the middle and high socio- economic groups in Collier County generally have sufficient access to quality medical services. Their care is limited only by the terms of their insurance policies and their ability to pay for uncovered services. As the previous sections of this summary indicate, however, that is far from true for a significant portion of uninsured community members with low incomes. What care they do receive is usually fragmented and inadequate to ensure good health over time. The Committee also ' found that members of this vulnerable population need education to maintain their health and that of their children, as well as to gain knowledge of medical resources that are available to them. The Committee found and documented widespread gaps in access to adequate health care for many of our residents. The Committee strongly believes that access to health care is a serious, community -wide issue for substantial segments of our population, requiring a community -wide solution. It will likely require maximizing use of state and federal funds and allocating the local costs to the entire community. OTHER SUCCESSFUL MODELS Committee members discussed a variety of possibilities for delivering care in an integrated system, as well as potential methods of funding such a system. While it is possible to create from scratch an original plan to address Collier County's unmet health care needs, the Committee believed the first step should be a review of some of the indigent health care programs already in place in other areas to determine their degree of success and the feasibility of replicating or modifying them for use in Collier County. Four programs were studied in varying depths: • Hillsborough HealthCare (Hillsborough County, FL) • Carondelet LifeCare Ministries (St. Paul and Minneapolis, MN) • Marion County Indigent Care (Marion County, FL) • Palm Beach County Health District (FL) 13 16J 2 The Hillsborough Health Care model has a national reputation as the best indigent health care program in the country and has already been replicated in a number of communities. It is a managed care, public/private partnership of local government, local businesses and the local medical profession that provides a free, integrated healthcare delivery system to uninsured residents with income below 100% of poverty levels and who have no access to other programs. Hillsborough Health Care's goal was to provide the same level of preventive, primary care for their target segment of the population that everyone else seeks, but in the most cost effective, efficient manner possible. The partnership sought competitive managed care proposals from a number of fully integrated networks of physicians and hospitals and competitively selected the best four. Health care is now delivered primarily through twelve neighborhood clinics operated by these four networks. This program has clearly demonstrated in just a few years that its efforts have improved health outcomes dramatically and at a reasonable cost to both taxpayers and the medical profession. It: • Provides access to primary, preventive care to 28,000 persons annually • Replaced a fragmented, short term, emergency driven delivery approach with a comprehensive, coordinated and managed continuum of care networks • Reduced costs per member per month to near $200 • Dramatically reduced participants' number of hospital admissions, average length of hospital stay and number of unnecessary emergency room visits • Changed the health care status of the population served as evidenced by the change in nature of hospital admissions from preventable conditions to those that mirror admissions in the general population The program has been funded by a combination of ad valorem taxes and a local sales tax. Recently their funding has been modified to eliminate the ad valorem tax and to reduce the sales tax from .5% to .25 %. The program has accumulated surplus reserves of $150 million. Carondelet Life Care Ministries in Minnesota fulfills the mission of this order of Catholic nuns to meet the health care needs of the indigent. Originally funded with less than $1 million, it now has 11 clinics strategically located in all the poorer neighborhoods in the area. The clinics are similar to Naples' Neighborhood Health Clinic in that their medical professional and staff volunteers provide free or low cost medical care to the indigent and underinsured in a manner that honors the dignity of their patients. 14 16J Z Each of their clinics is operated rent -free in a church facility or other location on a part-time basis. They merely lock up equipment and supplies at all other times. The clinics conduct 5000 patient visits per year, 20% of which are children. They charge nothing, but do request a donation. A key to their success is their volunteer base; they average over 200 volunteer physicians, nurses and admissions persons each week. All of the 800 physicians enrolled in their program, representing all specialties, are volunteers; 80% are still in active practice. The Ministries contract with local hospitals and a major pharmacy wholesaler at very favorable rates. Their annual operating budget is $500,000, with all fundraising from the private sector — from private foundations, local corporations, and one annual gala dinner party. They accept no government funding and have strong support from the local medical society. While Carondelet LifeCare Ministries is successful at meeting many of the health care needs of the indigent population at very little cost, it is important to understand that the State of Minnesota has a comprehensive, state - funded indigent health care plan in place that Florida does not. This greatly reduces the number of eligible participants seen and the length of time they need to be served by the program. Marion County implemented the Marion County Indigent Health Care System in 1991, two years after forming the Marion County Indigent Care Oversight Board to address the issue of health care access by indigent residents of Marion County. At that time Marion County had a population of about 200,000, 48% of whom were between the ages of 25 and 64. Their county's economy and employment status were both below state averages. Further, 55% were employed by small businesses and 75% were employed in the retail and service sectors. Their system is a public/private venture aimed at meeting the health care needs of a target population earning less than 125% of federal poverty levels and without health insurance. Eligibility screening is done by the public health department and by county employees. Primary care is provided by the health department, with emphasis on those with chronic illnesses. Patients are seen by appointment. The Oversight Board and the two hospitals created episodic care clinics to treat patients with minor non - recurring illnesses in order to alleviate the problem of indigents presenting themselves to hospital emergency rooms for such treatment. These clinics are staffed with a combination of paid and volunteer staff. Patients are seen on a walk -in basis. 15 16J 2 The hospitals continue to play an important role in serving the indigent care system. They continue to treat true emergencies and other medical situations requiring hospitalization and assist patients in accessing care within the indigent care system. They also assist both the primary care and episodic care clinics in the provision of ancillary services. Patients requiring specialized care are referred to a voluntary specialist by the primary care, episodic care or the hospital. 91 % of the county's specialty physicians participate. Marion County provides financial support to assist each of the other components. In 1994, the county provided in excess of $3 million. The county also provides assistance of various county departments to help coordinate services and for eligibility screening. The Marion County program has been successful in, among other things, improving health care access for the indigent and reducing the unnecessary use of hospital emergency rooms. The Palm Beach County Health District was formed in 1989 by a voter referendum. The District is funded by an ad valorem tax limited to 2 mills. Currently the District assesses .9 mills. The District has accumulated surplus reserves of $90 million. The District is governed by an independent board reporting directly to the community. Three board members are appointed by the Board of County Commissioners, three by the Governor, and one is filled by the Public Health Director. Eligibility is limited to persons earning less than 150% of Federal Poverty Levels who have no other insurance. The District's eligibility screening is quite rigorous and residency is a requirement. There has been no noticeable relocation of indigents to Palm County to avail benefits of the program. Health care is provided to members through a public/private partnership via a managed care model. The District negotiates rates with local hospitals and physicians ($750 per diem for in- patient days and 80% of approved Medicare rates for physicians). The local health care provider community actively supports the program. The District emphasizes primary, preventive care and insists on the same level of service afforded private patients. The District has experienced positive health outcomes including: • Members' hospital admission rates are lower than for Medicaid patients W 161 2 • Members average length of hospital stay is less than for Medicaid patients • Members' use of hospital emergency rooms is very low While there are substantial differences in the way each of these programs is structured and funded, each has improved the access to care of its target population. The Carondelet plan is the only one funded by the private sector, but it is uniquely "supported" by a comprehensive statewide plan. The others are public /private partnerships in other Florida communities that are funded by local taxes. Each has improved the health of its target population to varying degrees Each has replaced a fragmented delivery of health care with an integrated health care delivery system that emphasizes preventive, primary care. Each has reduced the use of emergency rooms for treating non - emergency care. They show it is possible to create a win -win situation. RECOMMENDATIONS The Committee recommends that the Board of County Commissioners seek ways to provide a safety net of funding to enable some kind of public /private partnership to be created that allocates responsibility for both service and financial support among the various constituencies — the local health care industry, the business community and the citizens of Collier County. This would not preclude continuing an aggressive search for ways to attract federal and state monies and various private grants to contribute to solutions. In fact, local government funding will likely enhance such outside capital. In May, 2000 the Committee advised the Board of County Commissioners that a second committee was needed to take the Committee's findings to a new level and lead a community -wide planning effort and find solutions. The new committee would need to possess the skills and experience required to evaluate the various successful models existing elsewhere, determine the likely costs, and how those costs should be allocated. The Board agreed and has since formed the Collier County Health Planning and Finance Committee. It will be the responsibility of this new committee to seek the best solutions to our local problems, estimate the costs of these solutions, identify alternative ways to allocate those costs among all constituencies and make appropriate recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners. CLOSING COMMENTS The information the Committee gathered paints a sad but accurate picture of unmet health care needs in our community. Health care providers continue to donate totally uncompensated care or care that is extensively discounted to individuals in 17 16J ? need. However, the current population of needy individuals in the county has seriously outpaced our health care professionals' and facilities' resources to merely absorb into their current practices or clinics the numbers of people who are unable to pay to meet their medical needs. For many, living in Collier County is paradise. We enjoy most of the finer things in life, including excellent medical care, and have the knowledge and means to live healthy lifestyles. We truly live "the good life ". Unfortunately, there is a significant portion of our community that does not have these advantages. These people are often invisible to the majority of county residents and visitors, but they are the people who clean our homes, do our laundry, harvest food for our meals, and keep our pools clean and yards and streets looking beautiful. Sometimes they are women without marketable skills who are widowed or divorced, skilled workers who become disabled, or owners of unsuccessful businesses. Worse than their lack of access to the "finer things of life" is their inability to provide for all of their basic needs, including necessary health care. There is no doubt the problem is real and it is serious. Without setting and implementing the right strategy, the cost in dollars and human suffering of indigent health care will most likely continue to escalate. The Committee believes that, rather than continuing to deliver fragmented medical care, an integrated health care delivery system is needed to successfully improve the health of the less fortunate in Collier County. The entire community should benefit from an integrated approach — taxpayers, working poor and other underinsured persons, hospitals, medical professionals and the business community. Resources are limited so the cost should be equitably distributed to the entire community. The old Fram oil filter commercial slogan, "Pay me now or pay me later" applies to health care as well as to oil filters. Funding care on the "front side" will eliminate much of the cost to our current haphazard system where treatable and even preventable disease is paid for on the "back side." The number of people in Collier County without access to health care is very real and unacceptable. The majority of these individuals are working, many at more than one job. They are trying to support themselves and their families, and only want the health care that everyone else has. Other communities have proven that it is possible to create a win -win situation — a public /private partnership to provide better care at less cost and improve the health, quality of life, and the productivity of the poor and their families while spreading the cost in an equitable way to all. We encourage readers to study the entire report, which contains added detail presented by each of the subcommittees, together with their individual potential solutions and recommendations. M 16J :) We thank the Board of County Commissioners for appointing this Committee to examine the access and care for all our residents. We recognize that much remains to be done before appropriate solutions for Collier County are identified and implemented. We are pleased to have had the opportunity to begin this process. We eagerly await the future findings and recommendations of the Health Planning and Finance Committee. Very truly yours, Members and Advisors of the Collier County Health Care Review Committee W 16J 2 Health Insurance Coverage in Collier County for the Population Under 65 Years of Age, 1999 INSURE 82.0% —v fix Heafth a—e Ad-m nis' ralicn an-' thoc, = 30,000 Uninsured Residents 4INSURED 18.0% 16,1 2 The Uninsured Population by Age Category, 1998 AnI 11 T-q ZEN /- f.v70 o u � ce,- Kaiser Corm-nission on Nledica; ' and the Uninsued arv'-; low Dev�.rllt. 16J 2 The Uninsured Under 65 Years of Age, by Family Work Status,1998 1 or More Full -temp 74.0% No Workers 16.0% Only Part-Time 10.0% v.-, v 16J 2 ADDENDUM TO EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 20 16J 2 Primary Barriers to Health Care • Cost • Access /Availability • Knowledge 21 16J 2' Recommendations of the Health Review Committee • Develop a "Safety Net" for the Uninsured through Public /Private Partnerships • Establish a Health Care Planning and Finance Committee to develop County- wide solutions (already formed) Overall Conclusions of the Health Care Review Committee 22 16,1 2 • Access to Health Care in Collier County is a serious problem (18 uninsured) • Majority of Uninsured are Between 19 -64 years of age and are Working ( "trying to make it ") • Community -wide problem requiring community -wide solutions Many examples of "Win -Win" outcomes both in Florida communities and across the nation: • Improved health and quality of life • Improved productivity • Lower Costs • Reduced use of emergency rooms 23 16J 2 INTRODUCTION The issue of health care insurance coverage and access to health care has been the subject of much discussion, concern and debate in recent years at the local, state and national levels. When one speaks of access to health care, one simply means the ability to get needed medical care when and where it is needed. The Institute of Medicine defines health access as "The timely use of personal health services to achieve the best possible health outcomes." Access to care can be hindered by a variety of factors, relating to the ability to pay for care, the availability of services, transportation, and other social and cultural barriers. Lack of health insurance – which is strongly correlated with income level - is the strongest indicator of inferior health care access. Broadly defined, access includes availability, accessibility, affordability and acceptability to patients and providers as well as continuity and coordination of care. As the population of Collier County continues to grow with its diverse socio- economic and cultural demographic mix, health care access challenges and issues are becoming more prevalent and relevant to our quality of life. Data received in May 2000 from the Florida Health Insurance Study a) indicated that for the aggregate Collier, Charlotte and Lee County region - 113,000 or 19.8% of the population under 65 years of age are uninsured. This compares to 16.8% for the state of Florida. The same source indicates that 21.8% of the population of this 3 county region under 19 years of age lack health insurance coverage. Generally, data for the state of Florida show a lower rate of uninsurance for children under 9 years of age, than those 10 -17 years -14.8% and significantly lower than that for young adults 18 -24 years of age -27.1 %. Later in 2000, limited information by specific county was released based on the Florida Health Insurance Study. It showed that Collier County's uninsured for persons under age 65 is almost 18 %, or almost 30,000 individuals. Nationally, most of the uninsured are employed workers and over 80 percent of those uninsured live in families in which someone is employed full or part-time. a) Florida Health Insurance Study, Agency for Health Care Administration, 1999 24 16J 2 HISTORY In May of 1999 upon the advice and request of the Director of the County Health Department, the Board of County Commissioners by Resolution No. 99- 230/257 established the Collier County Health Care Ad Hoc Committee. The resolution was the first to officially address the longstanding issue of improving the insufficient access to medical and other health care services within the community of Collier County. The Board of County Commissioners was specific and focused with regard to the charge to the committee: a) Review existing health care systems in Collier County. b) Determine if adequate access and health care is available to all residents of Collier County. c) Provide a report and recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners Specific functions, powers and duties of the committee include: 1) Examine existing health care systems in place for all Collier County populations. 2) Determine if adequate access and care for the different populations of Collier County exists. 3) If insufficient care or access exists, review options for correcting gaps and make recommendations in the final report. 4) Proposed options should include the improved use of existing resources as the preferred solution. 5) Any funding solutions should include the use of existing health care funding sources and /or private sources before consideration of tax resources. 25 16J 2 The Committee has been meeting methodically on a monthly basis while six established sub - committees /workgroups meet on a more frequent basis dependent upon pending work or data collection. The six sub - committees are: a) Children's workgroup b) Underinsured workgroup c) Elderly workgroup d) Dental workgroup e) Mental Health and Substance Abuse workgroup, and f) Models that work workgroup In addition a new Sub - committee: Report Facilitation workgroup has recently been created (March 2000). This new workgroup will assure that the final report of the Committee is technically accurate and addresses priority public health access issues and offers specific recommendations. In late December 1999, the Committee released interim progress reports for the Children's, Uninsured, Elderly, Dental and Mental Health and Substance Abuse workgroups —the Models that Work subgroup was not established until January 2000. Summaries of the progress of each individual subcommittee are included in the next section of this report. Immediately subsequent to the establishment of the Health Care Review Committee the Director of the Collier County Health Department resigned to accept a position in the state of Virginia (July 1999). In February 2000, Dr. Joan Colfer assumed the position of Director of the Collier County Health Department. The Committee and the Health Department Director are currently beginning work on the analysis and preparation of the health care policy recommendations in the area of access at the local level. In addition, the long awaited Florida Health Insurance Study administered by the Agency for Health Care Administration was released in April 2000. The survey commissioned by the Florida legislature, is a multi -year project intended to provide a detailed summary of the complex issues of the uninsured. It is envisaged that this survey, one of the most comprehensive studies undertaken to examine health insurance in a single state, will assist the Committee in its work effort and analyses. 16J 2 SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS 27 UNDERINSURED 16J 2 16J ?_ THE UNDERINSURIED SUBCOMMITTEE Whether resulting from increased population growth or other socio- economic factors, Collier County has a significant number of individuals who can be classified as either uninsured or underinsured. In general, these individuals are working class men and women between the ages of 19 and 64, many having incomes lower than 150% of the federal poverty level. Many of those persons within the above referenced group receive little or no health care at all. Those who do receive periodic treatment often lack access to follow -up care due to a variety of reasons ranging from a lack of funds for prescriptions and /or specialty care to lack of transportation. Such inability to access basic primary care places a tremendous amount of strain on those organizations that do attempt to provide some manner of care for those in need. The burden placed on those entities providing the resources are, in turn, passed on to the rest of the population of Collier County, either directly or indirectly. Although additional supporting data would be helpful, enough data exists to clearly support the conclusions stated above. Data provided by Naples Community Hospital and Collier Health Services, Inc., indicates that most "charity costs" are generated by those between the ages of 19 and 64. For example, for those persons in the 19 -64 age range, the percentage of uncompensated care ranged from 62% to 72 %.('1 Though completed information is not yet available from the Neighborhood Health Clinic, (2) the data available reflects that the NHC had over 3000 patient visits by underinsured persons living in Collier County. These same patients had over 4500 prescriptions for medications filled at the clinic. Further data supporting the aforementioned conclusions is available and has been submitted to the Health Care Review Committee. A complete review of the data provided to the Health Care Review Committee(3)reflects that those "working poor" who are in need of greater access to health care, tend to be segregated in specific geographic areas within Collier County.() These areas contain a significant "working class" population many of whom are underinsured.(5) ' NCH uncompensated cared analysis for FY98; Table IV indicates 5015 of the 6915 uncompensated were generated by individuals between the ages of 18 and 64. CHSI data reflecting the payment sources of those obtaining care from CHSI indicate that 62. 1 % had no method of payment 2 The Neighborhood Clinic was newly formed in early 1999 and as of this writing only had data for their first year and one -half of operation. Their data for the short period of time of operation is quite impressive and available to interested parties. 3 Data provided by the various entities, both public and private is on file with the Collier County Health Department. ° Data provided by NCH for the provision of charity care for FY 97 -FY98 indicates that the predominate amount of uncompensated care was provided to those persons living in East Naples, Golden Gate City and Immokalee. S Many individuals in these "working class" areas are presumably under employed or employed in jobs that provide inadequate health insurance, if any at all. Hard data evidencing these assumptions has not yet been provided to the committee.. 29 16J 2 Although some of the health care needs of the people living in these clusters are being met, significant gaps in the access to complete care appears to exist. Specifically, these gaps are present in the areas of primary care, mental health, dental health, and vision care. Also the lack of consistent transportation may affect access to care. Presently, various entities both public and private have been attempting to provide the health care needs of those without adequate access to care. Those entities include the following: NCH Cleveland Clinic Collier Health Services Neighborhood Clinic David Lawrence Center Senior Friendship Center Guadalupe Center Friendship House FL Dept. of Health County Health Dept. County Social Services In addition to the above - mentioned entities, other resources are also potentially available to assist in the provision of care. Those entities include the following: Florida Gulf Coast University International College Edison Community College University of Miami Nova Southeastern University Retired Physicians and other Volunteers In Florida, solutions to similar situations have been found by implementing a health care delivery system targeted at a specific population group in need. These delivery systems have often been based on one of two models, the Safety Net Model (Hillsborough County) and the Dollars Follow Patient Model(6) Both Hillsborough and Palm Beach Counties have models that work! In the Safety Net Model, the most likely to succeed in Collier County, a joint public/private partnership would establish a delivery system operated similarly to a managed care plan. The care would be provided by contract providers at strategically placed geographic locations. In the second model, patients in the plan would receive their care in a less structured manner from participating providers. In order to provide an acceptable system of health care in Collier County a comprehensive health care system should be established and coordinated from all available and existing resources. In order for such a system to be effective, a constant source of funding must be present. 6 See Ira Clark's Hat( -Cent, Florida Trend, September 1999. 30 16J 2 Potential funding sources include, but are not limited too, local government (sales /property tax), state government (grants /sovereign immunity), and private donations (funds /site locations /volunteer time). Although a source of payment (Medicaid) is available for some of the individuals in the 19 -64 age group a significant portion of these persons do not qualify for coverage. Without a coordinated system to deliver primary health care, the expenses generated by these persons will continue to be absorbed by those private entities providing services. The end result will affect, to varying degrees, the entire population of Collier County. Therefore, it is recommended that the Collier County Health Care Review Committee focus its efforts on the development of a health care delivery system, such as the one used in Hillsborough County or Palm Beach County. The cost for such a plan would be spread out among the private participants in the plan (through the acceptance of lower rates for treatment, volunteer services and the provision of delivery sites), as well as, local and state government entities. At the time of this report, the potential cost to local government has not been determined. However, once a proposed delivery option has been chosen a more definitive cost structure can be determined. 31 16J 2 MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE 32 16J 2 THE MENTAL HEALTH AND SUBSTANCE ABUSE SUBCOMMITTEE Executive Summary For a number of years, Florida has witnessed an ever - widening gap created by a decrease in the availability and affordability of mental health and substance abuse services and a dramatic rise in the number of individuals in need. Public and private sources of funds to meet the needs of people seeking mental health and substance abuse intervention are not keeping pace with the growing demand. Financial resources provided by the State of Florida are increasingly targeted towards individuals at risk of institutional care. Fewer public dollars are spent for prevention and education. The need has already outstripped our current community resources as indicated by increasing waiting lists and delays for those seeking care. These trends in Southwest Florida have been compounded by the abrupt closure of Charter Glade, a 144 -bed private psychiatric hospital in nearby Fort Myers, which ceased providing services on June 8, 2000, due to economic losses. Further complicating the situation is the projected closure in April 2002, of G. Pierce Wood Memorial Hospital, the state's only public mental hospital serving this area. In general, much of the shortfall is due to insurance limits and restricted or declining federal and state support. A variety of political considerations, combined with a stigma and prejudice associated with these issues, and a general lack of understanding have all contributed to the problem. Anticipated in the future are greater demands for emergency mental health and substance abuse intervention, increases in associated crime and incarceration, and a subsequent overload of community institutions such as hospitals and law enforcement systems. The ultimate costs are borne by the taxpayer. The lack of available and affordable mental health and substance abuse services for the uninsured and underinsured in Collier County is evidenced by a variety of factors including the following: • Long waiting lists for publicly funded care, treatment and follow -up services and severe limits on the availability of dollars to increase such services; • Over - utilized emergency and crisis stabilization services; • Delays in both the initiation of court- ordered treatment and placement and the processing time for defendants with mental illness or substance abuse diagnoses; • Inadequate a.) subsidies for medications, b.) care for persons with a chemical dependency problem, c.) housing and employment opportunities; • The lack of a coordinated, easily- understood community -based system of out - patient care, including supportive counseling; • Constraints upon service availability for all but those with the most acute need; • Lack of public transportation, especially for those who have lost their driving privileges. 33 16J 2 'The Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) at the University of Florida estimates the percentage of the population in each county in Florida in poverty. In Collier County, the percentage is estimated at 13.1 %. The SMI Poor column is a simple extrapolation of these estimates. Poverty is defined "by income levels that (depending on family or household size) describe a family as being in want of extreme necessities." Income cutoffs or poverty thresholds used by the Bureau of the Census to determine the poverty status of families and individuals are defined by family size and by presence and number of family members aged 18 and under. Unrelated individuals and two- person families are differentiated by age of householder. If total income of a family or individual is less than the corresponding threshold, the family or individual is classified as below the poverty level. 2SMI Beds is defined as residential or inpatient beds used for psychiatric and mental health treatment. In Collier County, this resource is limited to the Naples Community Hospital and the David Lawrence Mental Health Center. The reader should be aware of several problems with the data in Table 1, all of which tend to underestimate the need: 1) The majority of people seeking help are not defined as having SMI, but have legitimate acute or sub acute mental illness. SMI data significantly underestimate the real need for mental health care. 2) It is likely there is a higher percentage of people with mental health issues among the poorer populations. Thus, these estimates based on currently available data are likely to be further underestimated. 3) The number of poor persons is a different variable than the number of uninsured persons, as is the number of insured persons without coverage for their mental health and /or substance abuse problems. Thus estimates of the numbers of residents in poverty will only very crudely approximate the number of persons needing their mental health and /or substance abuse problems subsidized. 37 16J 2 As evidenced in Table 2 (shown below), the 1997 -1998 Alcohol, Drug Abuse and Mental Health (ADM) Plan Update for District 8 also provided estimates of the number of adults and children in need of mental health services and substance abuse services based on 1998 population estimates. Table 2: Estimated Number of Adults and Children in Need of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services in Collier County Mental Health Substance Abuse Adults Children Adults Children 10,425 4,778 3,682 6,516 However, the ADM Plan Update does not estimate how many of these persons will need their care subsidized. Again, we generated estimates of the number of uninsured persons in need of mental health and substance abuse services by using BEBR poverty estimates (as defined earlier). Table 3: Estimated Number of Poor Adults and Children in Need of Mental Health and Substance Abuse Services in Collier County Mental Health Substance Abuse Adults Children Adults Children 1,366 1,042 482 1,420 It should be noted that the percentage of estimated poor adults in need of mental health and substance abuse services in Collier County is 13.1 %, and the number of estimated poor children in need of mental health and substance abuse services in Collier County is 22 %. In 1998/1999 the David Lawrence Center opened 10,928 cases, of which 91 % were at or below the federal poverty guidelines. Ten years ago this statistic was only 60 %. The number of uninsured, working poor citizens who need subsidized care continues to grow at an alarming rate. 16J 2 Unmet Needs According to information provided by the David Lawrence Center, several critical areas of need have waiting lists and limited access, particularly in the following areas: • Chemical dependency • Residential treatment • Subsidized psychiatric & psychotropic medications • Affordable housing • Long term supportive counseling /case management • Mobil crisis response team and increased referral resources Gaps in service identified by the mental health and substance abuse committee include inadequate: • Crisis stabilization for children • Residential care for children • Ongoing support of children in the welfare system • Early intervention and assessment for all ages • Emergency involuntary treatment beds • Mental health and substance abuse programs in correctional facilities • Halfway Houses for the chemically dependent • Elderly day treatment and transitional living programs • Elderly respite care and family support for families dealing with mental illness and substance abuse challenges Resources In Collier County the mental health and substance abuse system of care is a patchwork quilt of services provided by a variety of public and private agencies. Information and referral services are provided by the Mental Health Association of Collier County, the NCH Health Care System, Project HELP, and the Naples Alliance for the Mentally III. In- patient care is provided at Naples Community Hospital, David Lawrence Center, and the Willough at Naples. Outpatient programs and services for indigents are also available from a variety of non - profit agencies and mental health professionals in private practice, including but not limited to those listed below: • AAR Services • Alliance for the Mentally III • Alzheimer's Support Network • Catholic Social Services • Collier County Jail • Collier County Public Schools • David Lawrence Center • Epilepsy Foundation • Lutheran Ministries • Marian E. Father Medical Center • Mental Health Association • NCH Healthcare System • Neighborhood Health Clinic • Project Help • Saint Matthew's House • Shelter for Abused Women • Willough at Naples • Youth Haven 39 16J 2 Despite the extensive list, many of these organizations or facilities are under - funded and understaffed to meet an ever - expanding need. Some private practitioners, such as physicians, psychologists, counselors, and addiction specialists also provide indigent care on a case -by -case basis. Collier County also offers a variety of supportive self -help groups. Numerous mental health education, advocacy, and prevention efforts are focused on the promotion of positive well being throughout Collier County, but reimbursement or the assessment of participant fees is often very limited. In addition, many of those with mental illness who receive medical care do not consistently comply with the treatment plan developed by their physician, including the use of prescription drugs. Potential Solutions • Support the creation of a collaborative community coalition of providers, funding sources, public health advocates, concerned citizens, business representatives and public spokespersons. Use the coalition to raise community awareness and encourage increased funding for mental health and substance abuse from the Florida Legislature. • Provide more preventative information and education. Develop an aggressive public service campaign to maximize prevention & education dollars. Focus community efforts on assessment and early intervention. • Hire a full -time grant writer or secure the support of an existing organization such as the Community Foundation to work with mental health and substance abuse organizations to secure additional outside public and private funding for Collier County. • Create an Advisory Committee to provide guidance and accountability to the Collier Board of County Commissioners, for oversight of public funding efforts and monitoring of unmet needs, especially in areas of pharmaceutical treatments, inpatient and outpatient treatment, and access to timely care. • Place outreach workers at hospitals and clinics to enhance numbers of enrollees in programs such as Medicaid, Medicare and other insurance plans. • Expand case management efforts for persons with chronic mental health issues, and provide a system that monitors and assures timely intervention. • Establish a well - publicized centralized health information and referral service with 24 hour, 365 day per year availability, perhaps by consolidating current efforts of multiple organizations into one effective community resource. • Establish a specialized taxing mechanism, such as an indigent health care tax, to fund comprehensive indigent care, including mental health and substance abuse services. • Expand the entire behavioral health care service delivery system to foster the availability and accessibility of appropriate services for everyone needing mental health and substance abuse treatment and support. • Establish a jail diversion program for incarcerated persons with chronic mental illness whose inappropriate behavior is a result of their illness rather 40 16J 2 than a criminal intent. Such a program would need to include day treatment and a housing component. 41 CHILDREN'S HEALTH 16J 2 42 16,1 Z THE CHILDREN'S WORKGROUP SUBCOMMITTEE INTRODUCTION: The Children's Workgroup Subcommittee had a total of twelve meetings since October 1999 and had the distinct opportunity to work with several key community members with expertise in children's healthcare. The Children's Workaroup Members are: Elaine Wade/ Chairperson Tom Schneider/ Recorder Mike Davis Fielding Epstein Ed Morton Stephen Rasnick Susan Craig/ Advisor The Invited Guests to our Meetinas have been: George Barton/ NCH Healthcare System Dr. Joan Colfer/ Collier County Health Department/Medical Director Pat Gulley, R.N./ Collier County Health Department/ Healthy Start Coordinator Linda Hendrixson, R.N./ NCH Healthcare System/ Director CMS Dr. William Lascheid/ Neighborhood Health Clinic Dr. Dennis Lucas/ Collier County Dental Society/ President JoAnn Maguire, R.N./ Collier County Public Schools/ Health Coordinator Head Start Jim Retzer/ Florida Medicaid Representative Valerie Ryan, R.N./ Collier County Health Department/ Florida KidCare Coordinator Senator Burt Saunders/ State Senator Edgardo Tenreiro/ NCH Healthcare System/ Executive Director, CMS PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION: Collier County is one of the fastest growing counties in Florida and in the entire United States. All sectors of the population are growing at an exponential rate. The population estimates in Collier County for 2000 according to the Center for Children's Future at the University of South Florida from birth to age 19 is 48,915 with a projected increase in 2005 to 54,597. In the school year 1999 -2000 there were 32, 231 students enrolled in the Collier County public schools Pre -K through Grade 12. With an unexpected increase of about 5.86% for school year 2000 -2001 enrollment to date is 34,121 in Pre -K through Grade 12. 43 16J 2 The county is comprised of a culturally and economically diverse population with a wide range of economic means, including large numbers of affluent, retired people; a narrow middle class; and large number of working poor, migrant workers' and others, most of whom are underinsured or uninsured. This creates significant challenges in meeting the healthcare needs of the children in Collier County. The challenges center in four areas: means, access, knowledge and availability. Many families are financially unable to pay for health care for their children. Many have jobs with small businesses that do not provide health insurance for their employees or if they do, the cost is unaffordable. Many also have jobs that do not allow time off during the workday to attend to their children's health care needs. Many of these same parents do not have access to transportation required to visit a health care provider. There is no public transportation system in Collier County. The NCH Healthcare System has established health care centers in Immokalee, Golden Gate and Marco Island areas, but pockets of underserved children still remain throughout the county particularly in Everglades and East Naples. The culturally diverse population presents many healthcare challenges, including health education. Some parents are unaware of recommended health schedules and routine "well child" care such as immunizations and preventive health maintenance. Education of families from varying cultures is critical in assuring that children receive routine care. The school nurse program in the Collier County Public Schools, currently supported for the most part by the NCH Healthcare System is a vehicle by which family education and linkages to the health care system take place. The school nurse is the only health professional that many students and families have contact with. There are only twelve nurses serving thirty-five schools and 34,121 students with a ratio of one registered nurse to 2844 students. The national recommended ratio is one registered nurse to 750 students. Two of these twelve schools have a full time school nurse and the other ten have a nurse on an average of nine hours per week. The school nurses often identify children with health care needs and they then find it difficult to find health referral sources within the community for these students. Parents are without health care providers to be referred to, transportation to services is a problem or parents are without funds to access available providers. In School Year 1999 -2000 the school nurses provided health room services to 78,419 students and provided 15,046 consultations to staff and families on health care related issues. 44 16,1 2 Collier County covers a large geographic area this makes the availability of health care a major challenge. There are pockets of population in the county that do not have close access to healthcare. This is aggravated by the lack of transportation. Further, many health care providers are available for routine office hours only during the working day. This encourages the use of the emergency room, the most expensive alternative, as the provider of choice because it is always open and parents know they will not be refused care. There are programs funded totally or partially by the state or federal government to help meet some of the needs of these disadvantaged children, including Medicaid and the Healthy Kids Program. However, there are impediments to getting all eligible children enrolled in these programs and in finding adequate number of physicians and dentists that will care for the children who are enrolled. Until recent state legislation was passed there were about one thousand local children whose parents had enrolled them in Healthy Kids but who could not benefit from the program because of a shortage of required local matching funds. New legislation in early 2000, however, implemented a "maintenance of effort" (MOE) concept which freezes the maximum local match. For Collier County this annual matching requirement is frozen at about $371,000, of which $300,000 was contributed last year equally by NCH Healthcare System and The Cleveland Clinic and the remaining by The United Way and the Collier County Foundation in the form of one year -only grants. The new legislation also eliminated any county level enrollment caps, which means Collier County can continue to enroll its eligible children in Healthy Kids until the state cap is reached. This new legislation creates a small window of time for Collier County to maximize its enrollment in this heavily leveraged health insurance program for children that is largely financed by state and federal funds. In effect, it will be a race by all counties in Florida to grow its enrollment. This is such a major one -time opportunity to attract significantly more state and federal dollars annually that a coalition of in- terested and involved organizations should be formed immediately to successfully maximize our local enrollment in Healthy Kids. Secondly, local matching funds of $371,000 must be secured annually or the MOE is removed and the total matching funds required will grow substantially.. Further, while these programs concentrate on school age children, they under serve adolescents. For example, the teenage pregnancy rate is high in Collier County, with an average of one baby being born to a teenager every day of the year. Most of these teen mothers are unwed and nearly a third of them seek prenatal care later than recommended. 45 16J 2 Unmet Needs: • Limited or no access to preventative and routine health care for uninsured and underinsured children and adolescents; Impacted by: • Increased county population growth and changing demographics of children /families • Increased numbers of seasonal and service- oriented employees without health insurance benefits • Limited access of health services after normal business hours • Lack of public transportation system • Limited number of physicians and dentists that accept Medicaid Insurance • Ineligibility for health care services based on non - citizen and migrant status • Limited identification, assessment and treatment services for children with developmental delays • Statewide 12 -15% of Florida children are uninsured. State wide 17% of Floridians under the age of 65 are uninsured and in Collier County 20% under the age of 65 are uninsured; Impacted bv: • Inadequate ongoing local matching funds for Healthy Kids Insurance • Dependence on private sector as the only source for funding of Healthy Kids Insurance • Inadequate outreach activities to improve access to Medicaid and other insurance programs • Limited local availability of pediatric specialty practice physicians, particularly in ENT, Endocrinology and Dermatology • Inadequate number of full time school health nurses in the Collier County Schools that provide linkage to the community health care system. Potential Solutions: • Develop and implement a County Health Improvement Plan; Including: • Establish an ongoing Health Care Committee with reporting status to County Commissioners • Hire a full time grant writer to work with the committee to secure funding sources for health care • Develop a public service campaign on preventive health care including access and availability of services • Implement a health care delivery system targeted at the population in need based on established models such as the Hillsborough County Health Care Plan and the Palm Beach County Health District Plan • Establish ongoing funding for the Healthy Kids Insurance Program and comprehensive health care system for the uninsured and underinsured 46 16J 2 • Expand community outreach activities to enroll more eligible participants in insurance programs • Implement a comprehensive school health services program in all Collier County Schools with full time registered nurses who can facilitate children's access to primary health care, provide for the early identification of health problems and manage health problems with other community providers. • Insure that County Government is the financial safety net for these programs. Resources: Community entities both public and private that have been providing support for health care services are: Collier County Health Department Cleveland Clinic of Florida NCH Healthcare System /School Nurse Program/ Kidsville Neighborhood Health Clinic Collier Health Services CMS (Children's Medical Services) Nemours Clinic Private Practice Physicians Walk In Health Care Centers David Lawrence Center Willough at Naples Guadalupe Center Collier County Social Services Collier County Public Schools/ Exceptional Student Education Nurses Resource Appendixes/ Children's Workgroup: References for Report On tile, available upon request General Information A.1 "The Torture's Horse: Caring for the Poor" A.2 Facts on Uninsured Kids A.3 The Impact of Children's Health Insurance Program by Age Medicaid B.1 Four -Year Medicaid Trends by County B.2 Collier County Medicaid Clients: January 2000 B.3 Number of Medicaid Eligible by Program- Group /Collier County B.4 Medicaid Utilization Data for Selected Services B.5 Number of Medicaid Eligible by Age- Group/ Collier County B.6 Medicaid Expenditures by Age Categories B.7 Medipass Physicians Map / Collier County 47 16J 2 Healthy Kids Insurance Program C.1 KidCare /Healthy Kids Factoids C.2 Eligibility for Florida KidCare C.3 Healthy Kids Enrollment Trends/ Collier County CA Healthy Kids Actuarial Numbers/ February 1999 C.5 Healthy Kids Enrollees by Zip code Area/ Collier County C.6 Collier KidCare Report Card C.7 Florida KidCare Recommendations C.8 KidCare Enrollment November /December 1999 Outreach for Enrollment D.1 Outreach Ideas from Covering Kids Proposals D.2 Ten Ways Community Organizations Can Link Children to Medicaid and Other Insurance Programs County Programs for Matching Funds E.1 Counties with Local Matching Funds from County- Government Based Sources E.2 Local Government Financial Information Handbook: September 1999 School Health Nursing Services F.1 1999 -2000 Summary of Collier County School Health Services F.2 Report: A Relationship Between Availability of School Nurses and Child Well -Being F.3 Issue Brief: Comprehensive School Health- What School Board Members Have to Say 48 ELDERLY 16J 2 49 16J 2 THE ELDERLY WORKGROUP SUBCOMITTEE Assignment: To examine the health care needs and health care systems for the elderly population of Collier County To make recommendations to correct deficiencies To pay particular attention to preventative and primary care services Workgroup members: Dr. Hermes O. Koop Dr. Donavin Baumgartner, Jr. Mr. Matthew Levine Mrs. Dorothy Campbell Meeting Dates: October 20, 1999 November 10, 1999 December 1, 1999 January 12, 2000 February 9, 2000 The Elderly Definition: Due to the effect of Medicare on health care funding for individuals 65 and over, the elderly will be examined in two groups: a) Age 65 and older b) Age 50 to 64 Data Sources: a) Uncompensated Care Study, October 1, 1997 to September 30, 1998; Fraser & Mohike Assoc., Inc. b) Senior Friendship Center, 1995 —1998 c) Collier Health Services, Inc., 1998 d) Collier Community Transit — Intelitran e) FoCus data D ACHA Discharge Data for Collier County, 1996 - 1998 g) NCH Healthcare System Outpatient Analysis Fiscal Year 1997 — 1998; Fraser & Mohlke Assoc., Inc. h) Collier County Population Data by Zip Code, 1998; Claritas, Inc. 16J 2 i) Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Surveillance for Selected Public Health Indicators Affecting Older Adults — U.S., December 17, 1999 j) Neighborhood Health Clinic, Inc.; April — June 1999 Data k) Associated Press: AARP data, 1995 INTRODUCTION: Healthcare in the elderly is an extremely important issue. Adults age 65 and older are growing rapidly in number, between 1995 and 2030 this U.S.population is expected to double from about 33.5 million to 69.4 million. Since health care expenditures for older adults are disproportionate to their numbers (i.e. in 1995 13% of the population spent 35% of the health care dollar), the aging population has important implications for the health care system. Due to the large elderly population of Collier County, this impact is even greater. In 1998 the 55 and older population of Collier County was 69,060, about 35% of the total population of 198,093. Since this county remains an attractive area for seniors, continued growth of this population segment can be expected. We need to insure adequate access and coverage for all health services. AGE 65 AND OLDER Significant Data: Demographics: a) Largest numbers of this age group reside in zip codes 34112 (East Naples), 34103 (Naples), 34108 (Naples), 34145 (Marco Island), & 4102 (Naples). b) Visits to Senior Friendship Center are from following areas: East Naples, 40 %, Golden Gate — 35 %, North Naples — 15 %, Marco Isand /South Collier County - 10% c) Visits to Collier Health Services, Inc. are from following areas: Naples — 56 %, Immokalee — 39% Funding: a) none b) Medicare alone c) Medicare plus Medicaid d) Medicare plus Secondary e) private indemnity insurance Despite Medicare's coverage, AARP (1995 data) reports that the average individual will still spend $2430 per year, out of pocket, about 19% of their average income. 51 36J 7_ • Promote the increase of medical services in the East Naples .and Golden Gate areas. • Expand dental services for low- income elderly. • Examine transportation alternatives for the elderly. • Emphasize, educate and possibly incentivize preventative measures and good health habits. • Examine adequacy of long term care options for the elderly AGE 50 TO 64 Significant Data: Demographics: a) Data more limited on where this population primarily lives — probably throughout the county. Based on available data a relatively larger proportion of low income adults probably live in the East Naples, Immokalee and Golden Gate communities. b) No data on number of retirees with preexisting conditions, not yet el- igible for Medicare. Funding: a) None b) Medicaid c) Medicare (disability) d) Employer sponsored e) Private Indemnity Per ACHA data, for the age group 50 — 64,347 of 3083 hospital dis- charges for Collier County in 1996 were self -pay. These numbers were 324 of 3231 in 1998. Per Fraser & Mohlke, for the year 1998, 481 inpatients, age 50 to 64, of the NCH Healthcare System, were classified as charity cases (of 1955 total), representing about $4.5 million in expenses. In this same age group there were 1100 uncompensated outpatient cases (of 6915 total), representing about $1.15 million in expenses. Geographic Access: a) Same as age group 65 and over. 54 16J 2 Transportation: a) Same as age group 65 and over. Dental /eye Exams: a) Per MMWR data, 70.2% of Florida adults between 55 and 64 reported a dental visit during the preceding 12 months. Mental Health /Substance Abuse a) Defer to relevant workgroup Pharmaceutical Costs: a) Same as age group 65 and over. Home Care: a) Same as age group 65 and over. b) Per ACHA data, 7.6% of hospital discharges for Collier County required Home Health Care in 1998. (age 50 — 64) Nursing Home Care: a) No good data on adequacy of coverage for low income individuals. b) Only funding source: Medicaid, for low income adults. c) Per ACHA data, 1.3% of hospital discharges for Collier County required skilled nursing care in 1998. (age 50 — 64) End of Life Care: a) Hospice — excellent coverage. Preventative 1 Primary Care: a) Limited coverage for Medicaid / Medicare population with no coverage for low income population. b) Per MMWR data, only 79% of people in Florida, between ages 55 and 64 had a routine check -up in the preceding 2 years. c) Per MMWR data, 62.8% of Florida adults age 55 — 64 are overweight, 31.8% are physically inactive, and 22.2% are current smokers. CONCLUSIONS At the present there is a significantly greater health care funding problem for adults age 50 to 64 than for adults 65 and over. RECOMMENDATIONS • Explore funding options to insure better access and coverage for individ- uals in this age group. • Implement an ongoing assessment program to insure continued adequacy of health care coverage and services over time. 55 16J 2 • Promote the increase of medical services in the East Naples and Golden Gate areas. Expand dental services. • Examine transportation alternatives. • Emphasize, educate and possibly incentivize preventative measures and good health habits. 56 16,1 2 DENTAL 57 THE DENTAL SUBCOMMITTEE Efforts to Date 16J 2 Since it's interim report of December 8, 1999, the Dental Subcommittee has had five additional meetings. The subcommittee interviewed the following persons to gain insight into their perspectives on the dental issues in Collier County: Bill Dillon, attorney for Collier Health Services, Inc. George Barton, Naples Community Hospital Dorothea Campbell, Coordinator for Senior Friendship Center Donald Deschesnes, D.D.S., Dentist at Senior Friendship Center Franklin Boyar, D.D.S., Project: Dentist Care of Palm Beach Roger Evans, Collier County Health Department In addition, a subcommittee member interviewed Dennis Lucas, D.M.D., President of the Collier County Dental Association in a meeting of the children's health subcommittee. Members have also been informed by Bill Lascheid, M.D., during full committee meetings, of the frequency of requests for dental services made by patients at the Neighborhood Health Clinic. The subcommittee's two advisors, Allison Nist, M.D. of the Collier County Health Department and Wendy Wilderman, M.P.H. of the Florida Department of Health, keep the subcommittee informed of the progress of the proposed volunteer dental clinic, Project Dental Care of Collier County. In addition, the subcommittee reviewed data from: • Florida Statutes • Dental practice permits • Dental treatment protocols of Senior Friendship Center • Sliding fee scale of dental services at Senior Friendship Center • Medicaid data of sources for dental services to its Collier recipients • Public health indicator reports on low income persons' dental care access The subcommittee toured Senior Friendship Center, including its dental operatory, and Marion E. Fether Medical Center (and its dental section) in early May. Findings When looking at availability of care for the county as a whole, the picture is dim for low- income persons without dental insurance. The agency that treats the majority of indigent patients' dental needs, Marion E. Fether Medical Center, is located in M 16J 2 Immokalee. It can be accessed by anyone in the county, with payment on a sliding fee scale. The Board of County Commissioners has now ordered bus service between Naples and Immokalee, which will greatly increase low- income patients' ability to access the center. It is extremely difficult at the present time for an indigent person to receive dental care in Naples. The sole low cost dental clinic in town, Senior Friendship Center, can accept only patients who are 50 or older. There is a waiting list for its services (approximately one month at this time) as SFC has only one operatory where services are rendered 24 hours per week, although established patients with dental emergencies can usually be treated quickly. Patients with Medicaid fare only slightly better, as there is only one private dentist who accepts it. Project: Dentist Care (PDC) is a successful volunteer dental program in various counties in Florida whose volunteers receive sovereign immunity through contracts with the state. The Collier County Health Department, Collier County Dental Association, and the Registered Dental Hygienists of Collier County plan to implement a modified version of this program at the health department. The program is pending the hiring of a dentist and dental hygienist or dental assistant to "anchor" the volunteer clinic. RECOMMENDATIONS • Provide preventive dental care to all Collier County children. • Provide dental treatment, especially emergency care, to residents of all ages. POTENTIAL SOLUTIONS Pediatric dental prevention and dental care for all county residents, regardless of age, should be provided through whatever program the models subcommittee and the Health Care Planning and Finance Committee determine is best for Collier County. Services should be available in several locations within the county and hours of operation should include evenings and weekends to more readily accommodate the needs of the working poor. 59 MODELS THAT WORK 16J 2 16J �o MODELS THAT WORK SUBCOMMITTEE The objective of this working group is to seek out effective indigent care models in Florida and elsewhere and explore ways they could be replicated here in Collier County. We expect to demonstrate to the Board of Commissioners ways it can address our local health care access needs. We have studied four models in varying depths: Hillsborough HealthCare (Hillsborough County, FL) Carondelet LifeCare Ministries (St. Paul and Minneapolis, MN) Palm Beach County Health District Marion County Indigent Care (Marion County, FI) Brief highlights of each of these plans are presented below. Hillsborough HealthCare: We have studied four models in varying depths: This is the obvious model to study because it is nationally recognized as the best in the entire US, and has been replicated in several other communities in Florida and elsewhere in one shape or another. Members of our Group made a site visit for a day of intensive dialogue with and presentations by their leadership team. Basically, the Hillsborough model is a public/private partnership; it is a managed care system for the indigent residents of their county who do not qualify for other health care coverage. Eligibility is based on Federal Poverty Guidelines. Services are provided free of charge. Hillsborough HealthCare is the result of their county commissioners originally forming a group of local business leaders to study why the local cost of caring for the medical needs of their indigent population kept escalating dramatically. This group was later revised to include health care experts and managed care specialists. The group determined that a critical success factor was to create a public/private partnership of local government, local businesses and the local medical profession to form an integrated healthcare delivery system, not continuing to deliver fragmented healthcare. They recognized that any solution was far too expensive for any one constituency to afford. They concluded that without setting the right strategy the cost of indigent health care would continue to escalate. They concluded that the entire community would benefit from an integrated approach — taxpayers, working poor and other underinsured, hospitals, medical professionals and the business community. They recognized they had limited resources, so they needed to equitably distribute the cost to the entire community. 61 16J 2 The goal of Hillsborough HealthCare is to provide the same level of preventive, primary care for their target segment of the population that everyone else seeks, but in the most cost effective, efficient manner possible. Hillsborough HealthCare sought competitive managed care proposals from a number of fully integrated networks of physicians and hospitals and competitively selected the best four. Health care is now delivered primarily through a network of twelve neighborhood clinics and is funded by an incremental local sales tax. They have clearly demonstrated in just a few years that their efforts have improved health outcomes dramatically at a reasonable cost to both taxpayers and the medical profession. They now provide access to primary, preventive care to 28,000 eligible persons annually. They have replaced a fragmented, short term, emergency driven delivery approach with a comprehensive, coordinated and managed continuum of care networks. They have reduced costs per member per month to $200. They have dramatically reduced their participant's number of hospital admissions, average length of hospital stay and number of unnecessary emergency room visits. In short, they have changed the health care status of the population they serve as evidenced by the change in nature of hospital admissions from preventable conditions to those that mirror admissions in the general population. In just four years they became so efficient and effective that they were able to cut the incremental sales tax rate in half to only % %, having built a reserve of $150 million. Carondelet Life Care Ministries: While Hillsborough HealthCare is a more comprehensive model, we were also very impressed with the Carondelet LifeCare Ministries in Minnesota. The sole mission of this order of Catholic nuns now is to care for the health care needs of the indigent. In many respects, their organization is similar to, but larger size and broader in scope, than the Neighborhood Health Clinic in Collier County. Both organizations have a mission to provide free or low cost medical care to the indigent and underinsured in a manner that honors the dignity of their patients using volunteer medical professionals and staff. The organization began in the early 1990's with initial funding by the Order of less than $1 million. They now have 11 clinics strategically located in all the poorer neighborhoods in the seven county Twin Cities area where the need is greatest. The clinics are supported by a central headquarters staff. A key to their success is their volunteer base; they average over 200 volunteer physicians, nurses and admissions persons each week. . All of the 800 physicians enrolled in their program, representing all specialties, are volunteers; 80% are still in active practice. 62 16J � Each of their clinics is operated rent -free in a church facility or other location on a part time basis. They merely lock up equipment and supplies at all other times. They conduct 5000 patient visits a year, 20% of which are children. They charge nothing, but do request a minimum contribution. They contract with local hospitals. Their annual cash operating budget is $500,000. They have a small paid staff. They are able to negotiate very favorable rates with local hospitals, a major pharmacy wholesaler and insurance coverage. All fundraising is from the private sector - -from private foundations and local corporations headquartered there and from one annual gala dinner party. They accept no government funding and have strong support from the local medical society. While they have been successful in meeting many of the healthcare needs of their target population for very little cost it is important to understand that the State of Minnesota has a comprehensive state - funded indigent healthcare plan in place that Florida does not. This reduces greatly both the number of eligible participants seen and the length of time they need to be served by Carondelet LifeCare Ministries. Palm Beach County Health District: The Palm Beach County Health District was initially formed to provide health care for the indigent and to provide and operate a trauma center. Later it assumed responsibility for developing and operating a school nursing program, and responsibility for operating the county nursing home. It also funds the local required match for Healthy Kids. The Palm Beach County Health District was formed in 1989 by a voter referendum in November 1988. The District is funded by an ad valorem tax with a cap of 2 mills. Actual assessed rates have been as high as 1.41 mills in 1992; they are currently at .9 mills. Since 1992, when it almost went out of business, the District has developed surplus funds of $90 million. Eligibility is limited to persons earning less than 150% of Federal Poverty Levels who have no other insurance. The District currently has at any one time about 14,000 members, but last year served 25,000 individuals. The County population exceeds 1,000,000. The District has 16,000 children enrolled in Healthy Kids and is targeting to reach a total of 25,000. The District provides health care to its members through a public /private partnership via a managed care model, using all 13 existing hospitals and 900 existing local physicians and specialists. The District negotiates all contracts and pays on a fee for service basis (no capitation) at about 80% of approved Medicare rates to physicians and at $750 per day to hospitals for in- patients. The local health care community actively supports the program 63 16J � Aggregate annual costs for the indigent care program approximate $47 million, with another $11 million for the school nursing program (180 nurses for 140 schools). These amounts do not include costs of the nursing home or the trauma center. The District emphasizes primary, preventive care. Each enrolled member is assigned to a primary care physician (PCP) who is responsible for arranging that person's total care. The District insists that its members receive the same level of care as private patients receive. The District has experienced positive health care outcomes for its members, including: • Members' hospital admission rates are lower than for Medicaid patients • Members' length of hospital stay is less than for Medicaid patients • Members' use of hospital emergency rooms is very low Eligibility screening, performed by 30 employees at several locations, is quite rigorous. Residency is a requirement. Despite some original concerns, the District has not experienced any noticeable relocation of indigents to Palm County in an effort to benefit from the program. Governance of the independent taxing district is provided by an independent seven - person board that reports directly to the community. Three of its members are appointed by the Board of County Commissioners, three by the Governor and one is filled by the Public Health Director. The Board focuses solely on policy; it hires a CEO who manages all operations and who reports to the Board. Marion County Indigent Health Care System: The Marion County Indigent Care Oversight Board was formed in 1989 by the Marion County Board of County Commissioners to address the issue(s) of health care access for indigent residents of Marion County. Three primary problem areas were analyzed. Prevalence (or lack thereof) of health insurance among Marion County employers; 2. The characteristics of the county- funded charity care patients served at the local medical center; and 3. The extent and nature of uncompensated care at the regional medical center. M 16J. � COMMUNITY OVERVIEW A brief snapshot of Marion County (at the time of the review, 1994) reveals certain characteristics that are similar to Collier County in some respects and dissimilar in others. Population Population estimates indicated that Marion County had a population of approximately 195,000 to 206,000 between 1990 and 1992. Approximately 48% of that population consisted of persons between the ages of 25 and 64. Per Capita Income and Employment Data Based on data from 1989 through 1992, Marion County had economic and employment statistics that were below the state average and well below those of Collier County, with the exception of certain isolated areas such as Immokalee, Everglades City, Golden Gate City and East Naples. Marion County Per Capita Income (1989) $11,782 Marion County Unemployment (1991) 8.6% Percentage of population employed by small businesses (1992) 55% Percentage of population employed in retail /service industry (1992) 75% SYSTEM OF CARE COMPONENTS In 1991, two years after the creation of Indigent Care Oversight Board, an indigent care system was implemented. The system was a joint public, private venture aimed at meeting the needs of the Board's target population (persons below 125% of the federal poverty level). The system of care addressed five distinct areas: 1) Primary care, 2) Episodic care, 3) hospital services, 4) specialty medical services and 5) county certification. Primary Care Continuous and comprehensive primary care services are provided by the county public health unit and are focused on patients with chronic illnesses. Established patients and prospective patients are screened by the public health unit for financial eligibility and are provided with appointments to address their medical needs. If the medical need of the patient presenting is more episodic in nature, the patient, if medically stable, is referred to an episodic care center. 65 16J � Episodic Care Unlike patients with chronic illness, such as hypertension or diabetes, a large number of individuals seek out medical care for non - recurring minor illnesses. As like many other areas in Florida and throughout the nation, the hospitals serving Marion County experienced a high number of individuals with minor illnesses who were presenting to the emergency room for treatment. In order to alleviate this problem, the Oversight Board and the two area hospitals created episodic care centers. These centers primarily handled walk -in type patients and were staffed by both paid and volunteer personnel. Hospital Services Although the Episodic Care Centers were set up to alleviate the burden placed on the hospital emergency rooms by patients accessing care of a non - emergency nature, the hospitals still play a very important role in the indigent care system. In addition to treating true emergencies and other medical situations requiring hospitalization, the area hospitals assist patients in accessing care within the indigent care system. Eligible patients are financially qualified for the indigent care system and provided with appropriate referrals to participating providers. The hospitals also assist both the primary care and episodic care centers in the provision of ancillary services. Specialty Care Many patients require specialized care that is not normally provided by either the primary or episodic care centers. In order to ensure that patients within the indigent care system had access to medical specialists, a Specialty Care component was developed. Made up of volunteer physicians, the Specialty Care component provides access to indigent patients via referral system in which patients are referred from either the hospital, primary care or episodic care component. 91% of the specialty physicians in the county participate in the program. County Government The final piece in the Marion County Indigent Care System is the county government. The county government provides, as of the 1994 report, approximately 3,000,000 in funding to assist all of the above listed components in their functions. Additionally, through its various departments the county government also coordinates services and provides assistance with regard to patient eligibility. .. 16 ,1 Conclusion An overall review of the Marion County program indicates that it has been successful in improving health care access to its target population. Further, the program has reduced the use of hospital services for primary and episodic care. Although such a system may not be entirely adaptable to Collier County it does provide some insight into the joint public and private partnership that would be required to reach Collier County's target population, which as of yet has not been entirely determined. While there are substantial differences in the way each of these programs is structured and funded, each has improved the access to care for its target population. The Carondelet plan is the only one funded entirely by the private sector and not a public/private partnership, but it is uniquely "supported" by a comprehensive Minnesota state -wide plan that does not exist in Florida. The other three programs are public/private partnerships in other Florida communities funded by local taxes. Each of the programs has improved the health of its target population to varying degrees. Each has replaced a fragmented delivery of health care with an integrated health care delivery system that emphasizes preventive, primary care. Each program has reduced the use of emergency rooms for treating non - emergency cases and each of the Florida programs does it relatively inexpensively by leveraging the power of group purchasing. They demonstrate that it is possible to create a true "win -win" outcome at the community level. There are many other successful working models in Florida and throughout the nation. More study is needed to understand the critical success factors and to determine which model or which combination would work best here in Collier County. 67 16J 2 FUNCTIONS, POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE HEALTH CARE PLANNING AND FINANCE COMMITTEE mm 16,1 2 Functions, Powers and Duties of the Health Care Planning and Finance Committee On August 1, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County adopted Resolution No. 2000 -245 establishing the Collier County Health Care Planning and Finance Committee for the purpose of recommending solutions to the community's health care needs. The functions, powers and duties of the Committee are: • to lead a broad based community health care planning process • to carry out a financial and economic analysis of program recommendations submitted by the Health Care Review Committee, as well as specific program recommendations made by its own members • to identify the most appropriate solutions to current and future community health care needs • To quantify the cost of these solutions and determine the optimum mix of funding mechanisms When reviewing funding alternatives to proposed solutions, the use of existing health care funding sources and/or private funding shall be considered before tax funds. The committee shall make its recommendations in the form of a final report to the Board of County Commissioners. All meetings of the Collier County Community Health Care Planning and Finance Committee shall be open to the public and shall be governed by the Florida Government in the Sunshine Law. .• 16J 2 ADVISORS Ron Burris Mary W. Cooper Wendy Wilderman Joan Colfer, M.D., M.P.H Susan Craig Mark Crowley Marty Kniebes Carolyn Bacon Health Planning Council of S.W. Florida Mental Health Association Department of Health Collier County Health Department Collier County Health Department Collier County Health Department Collier County Health Department Collier County Health Department 70 MEMBERS NAME AFFILIATION Richard Akin Collier Health Services, Inc. Donavin Baumgartner, Jr., M.D. Retired Physicians Association Susan Bello Collier County Medical Society Alliance Anne Campbell League of Women Voters Dorothy Campbell Senior Friendship Center, Inc. Mike Davis Greater Naples Area Chamber of Commerce Fielding Epstein Cleveland Clinic Florida Sister Judy Dohner Guadalupe Day Care Center Vicki Freeman National Alliance for the Mentally III Dr. Hermes Koop Collier County Medical Society Dr. William Lascheid Neighborhood Clinic, Inc. Matthew Levine Member at Large Randy E. Merrill Health & Human Services Board Ed Morton Naples Community Hospital Peter Nguyen, DDS Collier Health Services, Inc. Stephen F. Rasnick Insurance Representative David Schimmel David Lawrence Center Tom Schneider Greater Naples Civic Association Elaine Wade Florida Nurses Association Darrell Ward 1St National Bank of Naples Dee Whinnery Collier County Public Schools ADVISORS Ron Burris Mary W. Cooper Wendy Wilderman Joan Colfer, M.D., M.P.H Susan Craig Mark Crowley Marty Kniebes Carolyn Bacon Health Planning Council of S.W. Florida Mental Health Association Department of Health Collier County Health Department Collier County Health Department Collier County Health Department Collier County Health Department Collier County Health Department 70 Itk- COLLIER COUNTY Primary Care Program For the Uninsured 16,1 2 Business Plan August 2001 16,1 Z BUSINESS PLAN PROPOSED COLLIER COUNTY PRIMARY CARE PROGRAM FOR THE UNINSURED September 4, 2001 16J 2 BUSINESS PLAN PROPOSED COLLIER COUNTY PRIMARY CARE PROGRAM FOR THE UNINSURED INTRODUCTION: In 1999 The Collier County Board of Commissioners formed The Health Care Review Committee, an advisory committee, to determine whether access to health care was a problem for any major segment of our population. The Committee concluded that access to health care was indeed a huge problem. The Committee recommended that The Board seek ways to provide a safety net of funding to enable some kind of public/private partnership to provide health care to low income uninsured adults under 65 years of age. The Committee also advised The Board to form a second advisory committee to seek the best solution, estimate the related costs and recommend how the costs should be funded. The Board formed The Health Care Planning and Finance Committee in 2000. In April 2001, the Committee presented to the Board its recommendations and requested the Board to provisionally approve funding of $2.8 million in the upcoming budget for the next fiscal year beginning October 1, 2001. The Committee's request for provisional budget approval was in response to the timing requirements of the County's budget cycle; and the Committee emphasized that it would complete its work on plan design and return to the Commissioners with all important program specifics before securing the Board's final approval. In April, The Committee emphasized that one of its first priorities was to preserve the existing School Nurse Program in Collier County schools, which was in danger of losing much of its funding. With 43% of our school children qualifying for the federal free and reduced lunch program, the school nurse program must be considered an integral part of the Community's health care system. Another priority was to fund aggressive enrollment programs for both Medicaid and Healthy Kids to ensure that the County was taking maximum advantage of all available federal and state funding before spending any local taxes. These two programs accounted for $300,000 of the Committee's total funding request. The Committee's main priority was the establishment and funding of a coordinated system of primary health care for the low income working uninsured of Collier County. In April, the Committee requested initial funding in fiscal year 2002 of $2.5 million to provide primary care for the entire year for about 7,000 of the estimated 20,000 eligible low- income working uninsured adults with incomes under 200% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines (FPG). This included estimated administrative expenses and start up costs. Page 2 April, the Committee has been working diligently to complete its studs � 2 Since Ap g g y p deliberations of plan design and eligibility requirements, the best way to deliver primary care, and administration and governance issues. As a result of its further study and deliberations, the Committee has modified its primary care recommendations as follows: Changed recommended eligibility requirements to only those with incomes below 150% of FPG; this reduces the estimated number of eligibles to about 14,000. Delayed recommended planned start date until about April 1, 2001, to allow time for needed pre - implementation activities. Lowered the recommended maximum number of enrollees in the initial year and annually thereafter to recognize, among other things, a lower number of eligibles. Largely as a result of these changes, the Committee is reducing its funding request for the proposed primary health plan (The Plan) for fiscal year 2002 from $2.5 million to $700,000. Since April, the Committee has also secured the support of the local Medical Society and local hospitals to form a "We Care" program whereby local physician specialists and hospitals will agree to provide needed specialty care free of charge to patients referred by the Plan's primary care providers. Details of the Plan are presented in this Business Plan. The Committee believes the Plan responds to the unique needs of Collier County and will meet the health care needs of the uninsured low- income working poor in a very cost effective manner. Further, the Plan will add to the existing infrastructure of organizations already working to meet the needs of this segment of our population. We look forward to discussing our proposal and revised recommendations in depth at the workshop scheduled for September 6 and to responding to all your questions. Very truly yours, Thomas G. Schneider, Chairman Collier County Health Care Planning and Finance Committee Page 3 OVERVIEW: 161 In order to improve access to health care for its low- income residents, Collier County is proposing an integrated system of primary and preventive health care services. Eligible enrollees will be 19 to 64 years old, working Collier County residents whose annual family income is equal to or less than 150% of the Federal Poverty Guideline (FPG). This program is considered to be the payor of last resort. That is, individuals eligible for other government subsidized health insurance (such as Medicare or Medicaid) or affordable private health insurance will not be eligible for this program. Primary care providers (PCP's) will be responsible for the seeing patients, ongoing management of their care and, when appropriate, making referrals for hospital, specialty, and other services and therapies through the "We Care" Program to be established. The graphic below gives an overview of the structure of services proposed to be provided as part of this system of integrated health care based on primary care services and case management. System of Integrated Primary and Preventive Health Care Services GOVERNANCE AND CONTROL I --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I ----------------------------------- COMPREHENSIVE, CASE MANAGED PRIMARY CARE AND PREVENTION ACCESS CORE SERVICES DISEASE HOSPITAL • Primary Care MANAGED AND SERVICES • Outreach . Preventive services INTEGRATIVE • Enrollment . Related Pharmacy REFERRAL • Hearth Educ. • Related X- Ray/Lab SYSTEM SPECIALTY CARE I SOCIAL SERVICES THRU I OTHER AGENCIES OTHER SERVICES / THERAPIES z Page 4 16J ? , MISSION AND OBJECTIVES: Mission: The mission of the Collier County Health Care Program is to facilitate access to a system of community- based, primary care and prevention - focused health care services for uninsured low income, working County residents. Community Goals and Program Objectives: The overall community goals of this Program are: • Improve the health and quality of life of Collier County's low- income working population. • Improve the productivity of this target population through improved health, therefore reduced absenteeism, turnover, and improved on the job performance. • Reduce the community's cost of uncompensated care. • As a result, improve the health and quality of life of the overall Collier County community. To achieve these community goals, specific objectives of the Program will be to address the needs of Collier County's uninsured low- income working population by: • Increasing access to affordable health care. • Providing low -cost pharmaceuticals. • Reducing inappropriate use of hospital emergency rooms as a site of primary care, thereby increasing emergency room capacity for more appropriate utilization. • Reducing unnecessary hospitalization for avoidable conditions. • Utilizing the success of the program to obtain additional state and federal dollars, as well as private sector funds, to further support health care access. PROGRAM SPECIFICS: People Served: Page 5 16J 2 i The population to be served by this program will be 19 to 64 years old Collier residents (excluding undocumented aliens) whose annual income level is equal to or less than 150% of the Federal Poverty Guideline (FPG). Since this program is considered to be the payor of last resort, individuals that are eligible for other government subsidized health insurance (such as Medicare or Medicaid) or affordable private health insurance will not be eligible for this program. The annual Federal Poverty Guidelines are a function of the size of the family. The following is the 2001 FPG formula for the 48 contiguous states: $8,590 annual income for a single person + $3,020 per each additional family member Therefore, for families up to 4 members, the following is the FPG (100 %) and 150% of the FPG: Size of Family 100% 150% (Persons) Poverty Guideline Poverty Guideline (Annual Income) (Annual Income) 1 $8,590 $12,885 2 11,610 17,415 3 14,630 21,945 4 17,650 26,475 It is estimated that there are approximately 14,000 uninsured adults (19 to 64 years old) under 150% of Federal Poverty Guidelines in Collier County. (The chart in Attachment 1 summarizes these projections.) Assuming that the number of people enrolled in the program over the first three fiscal years of operation will be capped at 7,000, the following are enrollment targets: • End of FY 2002 (Sept. 30) 2,000 Enrollees • End of FY 2003 (Sept. 30) 5,000 Enrollees • End of FY 2004 (Sept. 30) 7,000 Enrollees If a fiscal year enrollment target is reached, eligible Collier County residents will be enrolled on a first come -first served basis with a waiting list, if necessary. Page 6 16J 2' Specific Eligibility Requirements: 1) Eligibility under the program is focused on the low- income working population of Collier County. A participant must be employed at the time of enrollment under the program or be in a government sponsored back -to -work project such as the welfare to work (WAGES) program or be permanently disabled awaiting eligibility for health care under Medicare. 2) Family income qualifications will be limited to no more than 150% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines. 3) The proposed program is the payor of last resort. 4) Only residents of Collier County will be eligible for participation under the program. 5) Undocumented aliens will be excluded from the program. 6) Eligibility for affordable health insurance at a place of employment and a unilateral decision not to participate disqualifies an individual from participation under the program. Affordable is defined that the person would pay 10% or less of gross income for health insurance premium. 7) The program will include at least an annual re- enrollment procedure, more frequently at the will of the program. Primary Care Services Description of Services: At the core of the proposed system of providing and managing health care are primary health care services and related pharmacy and ancillary services (such as laboratory.) Primary care providers (PCP's) will be responsible for seeing patients, the ongoing management of their care and, when appropriate, making referrals through the 'We Care" Program for hospital, specialty, and other services and therapies as well as for community social services. Primary care services will be offered initially in two geographic locations within the County, the urban area surrounding Naples and Immokalee. There is a shortage of primary care physicians for the entire population of Collier County, particularly in the winter when the number of seasonal residents increases. This puts additional stress on already crowded emergency rooms. Services covered under the primary care program are listed in Attachment 2 and services not covered are listed in Attachment 3 with identification of the source of the service for the patient. 16J 2 Page 7 Vendor / Provider Selection: In order to build upon existing resources, information was collected through meetings with various health care providers to determine the level of interest and ability to provide these primary care services. Based upon these meetings, levels of interest, and the desire to have one principal provider of primary care, it is recommended that Collier Health Services, Inc. (CHSI) be considered a preferred organization to provide these services. CHSI is the designated Federally Qualified Health Center (FQHC) for the Immokalee area and has expressed an interest in establishing a clinic in Naples to address the needs of program participants. The needs of program participants in the Immokalee area would be addressed through their current clinic. CHSI's mission is to assist in providing primary care access for the uninsured and people eligible for health care under state and federal government programs. They are provided certain advantages due to their FQHC status. Examples of advantages are: • FQHC's have advantages in recruiting primary care physicians to treat low income populations • FQHC's have access to preferred pricing such as the 340B pharmacy pricing described in the next section. President Bush's administration is emphasizing the FQHC's as a focal point for expansion of primary care services. Additional monies have been put into the federal budget to support FQHC expansion. However, in order for a community to leverage these funds there will need to be a demonstrated local financial commitment. It is recommended that the County negotiate with CHSI to provide primary care. CHSI has expressed interest and our estimated budget is based upon CHSI as the provider. However, this does not preclude the County from using a request for information (RFI) or a request for proposal (RFP) to select the provider. Financial Matters: The following are options for methods of reimbursing providers for services: 1) Fee - for - service based on a percentage of Medicare or Medicaid rates. 2) Capitation of the primary care portion. 3) A flat fee based upon a negotiated "Cost Plus" approach. The flat fee approach is the Committee's preferred reimbursement method for negotiation with the preferred provider(s). Each enrolled participant will be required to pay the provider a co -pay of $6 per visit. Related Pharmacy Services: Description of Services: Page 8 16J 2 The pharmacy program will utilize a tight, limited formulary that optimizes the use of 3408 discount funding and emphasizes generic drugs, compassionate drug funding, and free samples. A budget and structure will be set up that optimizes this mix and oversees it over time. The 340B pharmacy pricing structure is set up to give discounts to certain government supported organizations such as Federally Qualified Health Centers, disproportionate share hospitals, health department clinics, and veterans' administration centers. By law, the 340B discount must be the greatest given by the manufacturers, therefore would result in the lowest available prices. The Office of Pharmacy Affairs (OPA) in the federal government's Bureau of Primary Health Care administers the 340B pharmacy program. OPA now allows 340B purchased pharmaceuticals to be distributed by commercial pharmacies, if the stock is accounted for separately. Therefore, utilizing a request for proposal, the distribution of pharmaceuticals for the Collier program will be contracted through commercial pharmacies with payments on an individual prescription distribution fee. This distribution fee will be collected by the pharmacy as a co- payment from the patient that is acceptable to the County. Compassionate drug programs are set up by many drug companies to distribute free pharmaceuticals to low- income people. These drugs are acquired for individuals and may take up to 60 - 90 days to acquire. This program is labor intensive but does allow acquisition of free drugs. Existing programs have experienced that the value of acquired drugs can be 4 times the salary paid to the pharmacy staff working on acquiring the drugs. Therefore, Collier County would budget for pharmaceuticals to be used for drug purchase and for the administration of the program. The administration of the program includes the cost of staff time to acquire compassionate drugs and to collect free samples. This will maximize the amount of pharmaceuticals purchased within the budget. Vendor / Provider Selection: The County's choice of the pharmacy to dispense 340B pharmaceuticals to program participants would be the result of a competitive bid based upon the fee charged to the patient as well as the level of service and multiple convenience locations for the patient's pick -up of their prescription. If the majority of the primary care program were contracted to one entity, it would be more efficient to also contract the compassionate drug component of the program. A successful compassionate drug program requires frequent contact with primary care providers to determine acceptable drug substitutions. Contracting the function would also allow negotiation of paying for a full or portion Page 9 16J of a pharmacy assistant to do the work under the direction of a pharmacist already working for, contracting with, or volunteering with the organization. Financial Matters: The budget for pharmaceutical services includes the cost of purchasing the drugs, as well as the hiring of a pharmacy aide to acquire compassionate drugs. The hiring of the aide would be done by the primary care vender, therefore would be part of negotiations for primary care services. The maximum annual cost of pharmaceuticals paid by the Plan for any individual patient will be $750. Hospital and Specialty Referral Services: Based upon data collected from local providers it is estimated that currently, hospitals and specialists in Collier County are annually providing $30 - $50 million in uncompensated care. This care is being provided in an extremely inefficient and costly manner. The care is unmanaged and tends to be through emergency rooms. By better coordinating care for the underinsured and managing their care through primary care providers, the total cost of the uncompensated care will decrease. The Collier County Medical Society and the hospitals in Collier County have acknowledged their support for a We Care voluntary referral system for specialty care for free on a pro - bono basis. This We Care program would address most of the program participants' specialty care needs. Active recruitment of all local specialty physicians will begin as soon as the Board of County Commissioners formalizes its financial commitment to the proposed program. The management of.this program will be a joint effort of the County Health Department, the County Medical Society, and the Hospitals. Governance and Administration: The program will be governed by an advisory board reporting to the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). This voluntary board will represent major stakeholders, including users, and will be appointed by the BOCC. Stakeholder groups to be represented include County government, the County Health Department, provider groups, physicians, not - for - profit social service and health care agencies, citizen groups, and clinic users. The advisory board will address major areas of program policy and oversight such as management and financial performance, medical issues, and patient relations. This is a governance structure that has worked well in other programs for the uninsured in Florida and elsewhere in the United States. The administration of the program will be the responsibility of the Collier County Health Department or the Collier County Department of Social Services. BUDGET: Page 10 16J 2 The chart below summarizes the proposed primary care budget for the first four fiscal years of operations. The program is projected to begin on April 1, 2002. Therefore the first fiscal year has only six months of operations. The model used in making the budget projections (detailed in Attachment 4) is intended to show that the program can be achieved within budget. It is not intended to dictate specifics on how the clinic must operate. This would be determined during competitive bidding for the services followed by negotiations and be fine -tuned in future years. The program's budget for the fourth year, when it reaches 7,000 enrollees, is within the original projection for the annual cost of the program that was presented to the Board in April 2001, even after adjusting for estimated inflation for the three intervening years. Recognizing that other non - profit organizations will continue to treat some of our target population and that no other successful program we studied ever reached more than 65% of its target population in any one year, we believe projecting an annual cap of 7,000 enrollees is reasonable. SUMMARY OF PRO -FORMA BUDGETS FOR PRIMARY CARE OPERATIONS FIRST FOUR FISCAL YEARS (FYs) Page 11 16J 2 CATEGORY 13T FY 2ND FY 3RD FY 4TH FY APR. 2002 OCT.2002 OCT. 2M OCT. 20" TO TO TO TO SEP.2002 SEP.2003 SEP.20" SEP.2005 KEY OPERATING STATISTICS: Enrolled Members Target: Beginning of Time Period: 0 2,000 5,000 7,000 Midpoint of Time Period: 1,000 3,500 6,000 7,000 End of Time Period: 2,000 5,000 7,000 7,000 Number of Months in Time Period 6 12 12 12 Member Months In Time Period 6,000 42,000 72,000 84,000 Hours Open per Week: 40 60 60 60 COST CATEGORIES CLINIC OPERATION $323,000 $979,000 $1,369 ,000 $1,564 ,000 PHARMACEUTICAL PURCHASE $15,000 $105 ,000 $180 ,000 $210,000 PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION . $122 ,000 $269,000 $347,000 $347,000 (Includes Program Mgt Tracking, Accountability, OA) TOTAL OPERATING COSTS $460,000 $1,353 ,000 $1,897 ,000 $2,122 ,000 (Without Start Up Costs) START UP CAPITAL Clinic $175 ,000 Pharmacy $10,000 Program Administration $45 ,000 TOTAL START UP CAPITAL $230 ,000 $0 $0 $0 TOTAL EXPENSES (Current Dollars) (Cash Flow Based - Rounded to $50,000) $700 ,000 $1,350 AN $1,400 A00 $1,150.000 TOTAL EXPOUES, (Mabrq f1A50 A00 $2,950.000 $2.500 A00 (At 5S% per year, Rounded to $50,000) Page 12 16J 2 Attachment 1. ESTIMATED NUMBER OF LOW- INCOME COLLIER COUNTY POPULATION THAT IS UNINSURED ..................... .................... ............................. ........ ......... >Z4F •'•'•' .......... D1S7iZICT'1i•'•' ............ ............ SSTIM4TEOX'•'•' CQL'LNcR.COUNTY'2MULATION'.'. 'PORULATION. . 'POPLLATIOU- IN..'. UNINSURED" i6i '.COLLIE@'.'.'.'. • iNCO.Mk�.i(vt<• %OFFQFUjATIOjt .'01jR)3UF)E1JD .• •, BELDNrZ009.OF.'.'.'.'.'•' WCO 1N ME LEVEL' 11fINCOMEL' EVEL'•' '.FEQEItALiPOYERTY•Gl1i)EUNP iFi , Ate: .VQT%►L...'. �9 To.a4.. of 7>,tal) 00 1888 COLLIER COUNTY < 100% FPG 20,609 10.4% (a) 41.0% (b) 8,450 ( b ) Between 100% and 200% FPG 31.194 15.7% (a ) 35.5% ( b) 11.074 (b) < 200% FPG $1.803 262% (a) 19.524 Total Population 198,093 100.0% 2000 COLLIER COUNTY < 100% FPG 26,153 10.4%( 41.0% (b) 10,723 8,578 Between 100% and 200% FPG 39 X65 15 =7% (e) 35.5% (b) 14053 11142 < 200% FPG 65.7 262% (a) 24_.775 19.820 Total Population (a) 251,377 NOTES: (a) The 1998 Collier percentage of total population et poverty level is utilized to estimate 2000 statistic. SOURCE: Claritas Estimates for Florida Department of Health (b) The 1998 uninsured rate by income level for District 14 (in which Collier is located) is utilized for 1998 and 2000 County estimates. SOURCE: Department d Health, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Data Analysis. (c) SOURCE: Department of Health, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Data Analysis. (d) It is estimated that 80% of uninsured are between 19 and 64 years old (20% are below 19 and over 65 is covered by Medicare.) Historic County and district data indicate the number of people from 100% to 150% of FPG is about the same as from 150% to 200 %. Therefore it is estimated that: People Below 150% FPG = People Below 100% FPG + 1/2 x People Between 100% FPG and 200% Page 13 16J 2 Attachment 2. SCHEDULE OF PRIMARY CARE COVERED SERVICES (MUST BE THROUGH NETWORK PROVIDER) COST TO COVERED SERVICES PATIENT Physician Office Services Copayment per Visit $6.00 Routine Primary Adult Care (age 19 and over) Coverage includes: routine physical examinations, prostate exams, colon cancer screenings, gynecological exam, pap smear, mammogram, basic laboratory tests, health promotion and disease prevention activities, immunizations, diagnosis of acute conditions, medical management of chronic diseases, referral to specialists. Copayment per Visit (including all laboratory services) $6.00 Mammogram Frequency Schedule $6.00 Ages 35 through 39; one baseline Age 40 and after; one every year Routine Well Adult Care Limitations & Maximums Limited to 1 visit per Year per type of service (except as otherwise $6.00 defined in schedule) Diagnostic Testing, Lab Out patient Services (Basic) Included in office visit copay. Prescription Drug Benefit Dispensing fee to be paid to pharmacy for formulary drugs. To be (Maximum annual value of pharmaceuticals per person = $750) negotiated during bid process. Non - formulary drugs. Not' covered. Page 14 Attachment 3. 16J 2 SERVICES NOT COVERED IN PRIMARY CARE PROGRAM (WITH SOURCE OF CARE FOR INDIVIDUAL) TYPE OF SERVICE SOURCE OF CARE Maternity Care Eligible for Medicaid Hospital Services — Inpatient Proposed to be part of We Care Pro Bono Services Hospital Services — Outpatient Proposed to be part of We Care Pro Bono Services Emergency Room - Hospital & Physician Services Proposed to be part of We Care Pro Bono Services Diagnostic Testing, X-ray & Lab Proposed to Hospital Based Services be part of We Care Pro Bono X -Rays, CAT Scans, CT Scans, MRI, Myocardial Studies, and Services Tomographic Studies Mental Disorders Alcoholism and/or Substance Abuse Proposed to be part of We Care Pro Bono Service or from Another Source Page 15 :Attachment 4. 16J DETAILED PRO -FORMA BUDGET CALCULATIONS -- FIRST FOUR FISCAL YEARS OF PRIMARY CARE OPERATIONS CATEGORY FIRST FISCAL YEAR APR. 2002 TO SEPT. 2002 KEY OPERATING STATISTICS: Enrolled Members Target: Beginning of Time Period: 0 Midpoint of Time Period: 1,000 End of Time Period: 2,000 Number of Months in Time Period 6 Member Months in Time Period 6,000 Hours Open per Week: 40 COST CATEGORY CALCULATION CLINIC PERSONNEL COST: Core (Fixed) Costs $27,675 Primary Care Teams Hired Physician Team: $273,950 serves 2000 average members per yr. 1.0 Team(s) $136,975 Hired Extender Team: $171,550 serves 1500 average members per yr. 0.0 Team(s) s0 Contracted Physician Team: $289,950 serves 2000 average members per yr. 0.0 Team(s) $0 Case Workers $32,595 serves 40 hours open per wk. $16,298 Pharm.Tech (Comp.Drug Prog.) $32,000 per yr. $16.000 SUBTOTAL $169,273 FACILITIES SUPPORT $125.983 (Such as rent, utilities, supplies, maintenance) CLINIC SUBTOTAL $322.931 PHARMACEUTICAL PURCHASE $30 per member per yr. $15,000 PROGRAM ADMIN Administrative Staff $128,040 full year, 8 months in first yr. $85,360 Eligibility Clerks _ $28,380 per clerk 1Clerks $14,190 Indirect Costs $10,000 Tracking, Accountability, CA: $12.500 TOTAL OPERATING COSTS $459.981 (Without Start Up Costs) START UP CAPITAL Clinic $175,000 Pharmacy $10,000 Program Administration $10.000 Tracking; Accountability, QA: $35.000 SUBTOTAL $230,000 TOTAL EXPENSES ( Cash Flow Based) (Current Dollars) $689,981 $689,981 TOTAL EXPENSES ( Cash Flow Based) (Inflated at 5.5% per year) Pa a 16 CATEGORY SECOND FISCAL YEAR OCT. 2002 TO SEPT. 2003 KEY OPERATING STATISTICS: Enrolled Members Target: Beginning of Time Period: 2,000 Midpoint of Time Period: 3,500 End of Time Period: 5,000 Number of Months in Time Period 12 Member Months in Time Period 42,000 Hours Open per Week: 60 COST CATEGORY CALCULATION CLINIC PERSONNEL COST: Core (Fixed) Costs $106,550 Primary Can Teams Hind Physician Team: $273,950 serves 2000 average members per yr. 1.0 Team(s) $273,950 Hind Extender Team: $171,550 serves 1500 average members per yr. 1.0 Teem(s) $171,550 Contracted Physician Team: $289,950 serves 2000 average members per yr. 0.5 Teams) $144,975 Case Workers $32,595 serves 40 hours open per wk. $48,893 Pharm.Tsch (Comp.Drug Prog.) $32,000 per yr. $32.000 SUBTOTAL $671,368 FACILITIES SUPPORT $201.544 (Such as rent, utilities, supplies, maintenance) CLINIC SUBTOTAL $979.462 PHARMACEUTICAL PURCHASE $30 per member per yr. $105,000 PROGRAM ADMIN Administrative Staff $128,040 full year, 8 months in first yr. $128,040 Eligibility Clerks $28,380 per clerk 2.5 Clerks $70,950 Indirect Costs $20,000 Tracking, Accountability, QA: $50.000 TOTAL OPERATING COSTS $1,353,452 (Without Start Up Costs) START UP CAPITAL Clinic Pharmacy Program Administration Tracking, Accountability, QA: SUBTOTAL $0 TOTAL EXPENSES ( Cash Flow Based) (Current Dollars) 81,3S3AS2 11,427,881 TOTAL EXPENSES ( Cash Flow Based) (h ifinted at 6.6% per year) 1`b'� 2 CATEGORY THIRD FISCAL YEAR OCT. 2003 TO SEPT. 2004 KEY OPERATING STATISTICS: Enrolled Members Target: Beginning of Time Period: 5,000 Midpoint of Time Period: 6,000 End of Time Period: 7,000 Number of Months in Time Period 12 Member Months in Time Period 72,000 Hours Open per Week: 60 COST CATEGORY CALCULATION CLINIC PERSONNEL COST: Coro (Fixed) Costs $106,550 Primary Care Teams Hired Physician Team: $273,950 serves 2000 average members per yr. 1.0 Team(s) 5273,950 Hired Extender Team: $171,550 serves 1500 average members per yr. 3.0 Team(s) $514,650 Contracted Physician Team: $289,950 serves 2000 average members per yr. 0.5 Team(s) $144,975 Case Workers $32,595 serves 40 hours open per wk. $48,893 Pharm.Tech (Comp.Drug Prop.) $32,000 per yr. $32.00 0 SUBTOTAL $1,014,468 FACILITIES SUPPORT $248,401 (Such as rent, utilities, supplies, maintenance) CLINIC SUBTOTAL $1,369,419 PHARMACEUTICAL PURCHASE $30 per member per yr. $180,000 PROGRAM ADMIN Administrative Staff $126,040 full year, 8 months in first yr. $128,040 Eligibility Clerks $28,380 per dent 3.5 Clerks $99,330 Indirect Costs $20,000 Tracking, Accountability, QA: 10$ 0.000 TOTAL OPERATING COSTS $1,896,789 (Without Start Up Costs) START UP CAPITAL Clinic Pharmacy Program Administration Tracking, Accountability, QA: SUBTOTAL i0 TOTAL EXPENSES ( Cash Flow Based) (Current Dollars) $1,886,788 $2,111,173 TOTAL EXPENSES ( Cash Flow Based) (krflated at 6.59E per year) Page 18 161 CATEGORY FOURTH FISCAL YEAR OCT. 2004 TO SEPT. 2005 KEY OPERATING STATISTICS: Enrolled Member Target: Beginning of Time Period: 7,000 Midpoint of Time Period: 7,000 End of Time Period: 7,000 Number of Months In Time Period 12 Member Months in Time Period 84,000 Hours Open per Week: 60 COST CATEGORY CALCULATION CLINIC PERSONNEL COST: Core (Fixed) Costs $106,55 Primary Can Teams Hired Physician Team: $273,950 serves 2000 average members per yr. 1.0 Team(s) $273.950 Hired Extender Team: $171,550 serves 1500 average members per yr. 4.0 Teams) $686,200 Contracted Physician Team: $289,950 serves 2000 average members per yr. 0.5 Team(s) $144,975 Case Workers $32,595 serves 40 hours open per wk. $48,893 Pharm.Tsch (Comp.Drug Prog.) $32,000 per yr. $32.000 SUBTOTAL $1,186,01 FACILITIES SUPPORT $271.82 (Such as rent, utilities, supplies, maintenance) CLINIC SUBTOTAL $1,564.3 9 PHARMACEUTICAL PURCHASE $30 per member per yr. $210, PROGRAM ADMIN Administrative Staff $128,040 full year, 8 months in first yr. $128,04 Eligibility Clerks $28,380 per clerk 3.5 Clerks $99,3 Indirect Costs $20. Tracking, Accountability, QA: 10} O.OW TOTAL OPERATING COSTS $2,121,767 (Without Start Up Costs) START UP CAPITAL Clinic Pharmacy Program Administration Tracking, Accountability, QA: SUBTOTAL TOTAL EXPENSES ( Cash Flow Based) (Current Dollars) 12,121,767 $2,191,466 TOTAL EXPENSES ( Cash Flow Based) (Inflated at 5.5% per year) z Page 19 Attachment S. 16J GENERAL ACTUARIAL EVALUATION OF FINANCIAL ASSUMPTIONS IN PROPOSED PRIMARY CARE INSURANCE PROGRAM (Separate Report is Attached) a Vector Risk Analysis, LLC 16J 2 VECTOR RISK ANALYSIS, LLC 2800 West 44th Street, Unit 602 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55410 Tel. 612-926-1662 Fax. 413-669-5012 hobson.carroll @VectorRisk.com DT: August 7, 2001 TO: Steve Rasnick FR: Hobson Carroll, FSA RE: Collier County Primary Care Plan for the Uninsured CC: file Dear Steve: You requested that I review the proposed insurance program being put together for Collier County, Florida, to provide basic primary coverage for the working uninsured of that locale. Your firm has been assisting with the design. You have requested me, at this stage, to make a general actuarial evaluation of certain financial assumptions being made relating to expected costs of such the program. Summary of Benefits and Eligibility The proposed benefit plan, as I understand it from the materials you provided and our discussions, essentially provides coverage for primary care doctor's office visits (including certain routine and preventative elements, although limited to one well -adult visit per enrollee per year), "basic" x -ray and laboratory procedures in support of the office visits, and a prescription drug benefit. There is a $6 copay per doctor visit (including any associated x -rays and labs, i.e., one copay per episodic day) and a yet undetermined copay in the vicinity of $3 per prescription. The benefits are provided through an exclusive network of physicians, and the prescription drugs provided according to a firm formulary, which is expected to be as "generic" as possible. There are no surgical, referral, emergency room, hospital, maternity, or mental and nervous condition benefits. There might be visit or annual maximum benefit limitations yet to Steve Rasnick August 7, 2001 Page 2 of 4 Collier County Primary Care Plan for the Uninsured 16J 2 be determined. Referral /specialist services (not covered by the plan itself) may be "arranged" through separate charitable care programs, and pharmaceuticals will be obtained through compassionate /donated drug programs whenever possible. Physician services will be provided at 80% of RBRVS (Medicare), though the possibility of a capitation at $18 PMPM has been considered. Eligible enrollees are persons aged 19 -64 who are "working" (according to standards of a definition to be established) adult persons with incomes 150% or under of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, who meet minimum residency requirements in the county, and who have no other access to coverage. This program is intended to be the coverage "of last resort." (The working requirement is waived for persons who are totally disabled, and not covered by any other government or private program.) Financial Projection You have made initial assumptions regarding expected costs of this program. These assumptions include $210 per member per year (PMPY) for the basic medical services (doctor office visits and associated DXL), $60 PMPY for prescription drug benefits, and $30 PMPY for administration costs. The basic medical and prescription costs are assumed net of copay, but do not consider the potential for discounts through 340(8) pricing or Compassionate Drug Programs. I have reviewed the benefit structure and certain available information on similar type primary access programs in other areas of the country, basic Medicaid data, and actuarial assumptions used for general commercial and special population insurance pricing models. In the attached exhibits, I summarize the data sources, range of data, and assumptions used in constructing two general pricing models in order to get an idea if your cost "budgets" appear reasonable. As you can see in Exhibit B the two different developments of PMPY projected costs are $271 and $253. These compare with your non - administration budget figure of $270. 1 will not comment on the administration cost, since that element is not benefit cost related, and I assume you will "capitate" that risk in one form or another. The benefit portion appears to be in a reasonable range of the pricing models used. Steve Rasnick August 7, 2001 Page 3 of 4 Collier County Primary Care Plan for the Uninsured Comments 16J In the pricing models developed, I have made certain assumptions relating to the cost components of diagnostic x -rays and labs, as well as average cost of a prescription drug. I have not yet been provided specific information relating to the likely range of costs of these items for the program, but believe that the assumptions I have made are reasonable based on my other sources of data. (Are DXL services only covered if provided in the doctor's office ?) Clearly, the definition of "basic" x -ray and lab benefits to be provided, and the ultimate nature of the complete formulary for pharmaceuticals, will be critical to the accuracy of my assumptions. Also, I think it is important to provide a cap on the some combination of number and amount of prescriptions to be covered. I am not sure how you "value" the cost of the prescriptions given the source of many of the actual supplies. Perhaps the definition of the formulary will alleviate my concern in this area, but I. think that this is one benefit area that has a bit of an "open- ended" nature, and some thought should be given to how much you are willing to spend on any one enrollee. My view is that if the discussed capitation option for physician services essentially covers everything but the prescription drug benefits, $18 PMPM is not a bad figure, and would provide at least frequency protection during the start-up year of the program, until actual utilization data is developed. Of course, it would be necessary and very important that even in a capitation environment, the data is collected on an "as if" fee - for - service arrangement so that the proper information can be pulled out later. Please let me know if you need anything else at this time. Sincerely, Hobson Carroll, FSA 16J 2 Exhibit A Collier County Primary Care Program Actuarial Cost Development Relevant Data Elements - Sources of Information and Assumptions Access to Care Program - Chicago, Illinois www.sphcc.orglprogram statistics.htm Office visits PMPY 1.2 Also Demographic distriubition of population. Radiology PMPY 0.117 Lab PMPY 0.363 Pharmacy PMPY 3.97 Kaiser Family Foundation - Information on Medicaid by State www.statehealthfacts.kff.org Various data relating to adult Medicaid enrollees for Florida. Various data relating to breakdown of Medicaid expenditures by type of service. Proprietary Actuarial Pricing Assumptions for commercial and special population (working uninsured) program cost models. Various data relating to assumptions for frequency of office visits, DXL, prescription drugs. Various data relating to "generic drug program costs. 16J ?_ Exhibit B Collier County Primary Care Program Some Rate Development Models Model A: Access to Care Blended with other Actuarial Data PMPY Office Visits Range Use Frequency Cost/Unit Annual PMPY PMPY visits 1.2 -4.0 2.6 2.6 $55 $143 DXL lab per visit .30 -.44 0.37 0.962 $25 $24 x -ray per visit .09 -.13 0.11 0.286 $100 $29 Total Basic Medical $196 Prescription Drug scripts PMPY 3.5 -6.5 5 $15 $75 Total Claims Cost PMPY $271 (all costsfunit are assumed net of copays - $6 per office visit, $3 per script) Model B: General Medicaid Data (1997 -1998 data) Number Florida Adult Enrollees (assumed non - disabled or special status) 400,324 Florida Adult Enrollee "Total Care" Expenditure $607,000,000 Average $1,516.27 Medicare expenditure breakdown by type: percentage of total to "acute" 53% classification items for ALL enrollees. Assumed "Acute Care" expenditure percentage for Florida Adult Enrollees 70% Portion of Acute Classification for Office Visits, DXL, Drugs, Plus 10% margin 30% This is the Program Benefit %. Crude Florida Adult Medicaid $ PMPY for Program Classification Benefits $318.42 = Total Care Expenditure Average X Acute Care % X Program Benefit % Adjustment for trend, program limits, difference in reimbursement rate, copays, work status 0.795 1.10 X.65 X 1.30 X.95 X.90 Projected Program Cost PMPY $253.14 16J 2 Interim Report April 2001 16J 2 Collier County Health Care Planning and Finance Committee An Ad Hoc Committee of the Board of County Commissioners Thomas Schneider, Chairman April 12, 2001 To: Collier County Board of Commissioners From: Community Health Care Planning and Finance Committee Subject: Interim Report and Budget Recommendation This is an Interim Report from the Community Health Care Planning and Finance Committee that includes a budget recommendation for FY 2001 -02 that is contingent on subsequent approval by the Board of the program specifics listed on page 4. This cover letter summarizes our conclusions and recommendations while the several Appendices add important explanation and detail. Because several Appendices were written by experts, we have chosen to include their full text in this booklet. The reader is encouraged to read each Appendix in full at the point where it is referenced in the cover letter. While this will require some "flipping back and forth" by the reader, we believe the slight inconvenience is preferable to abridging the attachments. BACKGROUND: In May 1999, the Board of County Commissioners appointed the Health Care Review Committee to review existing health care systems in Collier County and determine if adequate access is available to all residents. The Committee documented serious access problems in Collier County for 30,000 uninsured residents under the age of 64 des..pite the exceptional generosity and compassion of private sector health care organizations and physicians. Of particular significance is that fact that there is, at present, no coordinated system for providing primary, preventative care to the uninsured. As a result, many uninsured residents defer treatment and then head for area Emergency Rooms for treatment and, in some cases, hospitalization for an avoidable condition. (See Appendix A for a precis of the Health Care Review Committee's Final Report). 16J 2 In September 2000, Commissioners appointed the Health Care Planning and Finance Committee to build upon the work of the Health Care Review Committee and: "...Identify the most appropriate solutions to present and future community health care needs, quantify the cost of these solutions and determine the optimum mix of funding mechanisms to finance proposed solutions....." Appendix B summarizes the Health Care Planning and Finance Committee's membership, organization, progress, and preliminary findings. The Models Sub - Committee identified and compared successful health care models from other communities, especially in Florida, and made appropriate site visits. Appendix C contains excerpts from Community Initiatives for the Uninsured: How Far Can Innovative Partnerships Take Us? and identifies the common elements of successful local initiatives to improve health care access for the uninsured. In Appendix D, Dr. Robert Tober, Chairman of the Department of Emergency and Ambulatory Medicine for NCH Healthcare and head of County EMS Services, discusses the local and national Emergency Room crises. He explains that the "safety net" we count on in case of a medical emergency is so badly frayed and stretched, especially "in season," that My individual could be at risk. An important contributing factor is the number of uninsured patients who do not have primary care physicians and therefore use hospital emergency rooms as their "doctor of last resort." In Appendix E, Steven Rasnick, President, Self Insured Plans, Inc., and a member of the Health Care Planning and Finance Committee, explains that the present decentralized approach to treating the uninsured is inefficient from an economic standpoint and causes a large indirect tax, or cost shift, from those who cannot afford to pay to everyone who pays for any health care service in the County. In response to your directive to lead a community -wide health care planning effort, the Communications Sub Committee and the Coalitions Sub Committee set out to promote understanding through: a series of speeches to community organizations by Chairman Tom Schneider; Press Releases on specific issues; story ideas for specific media organizations; and a Town Hall Meeting in Golden Gate on March 21, 2002 (see Appendix F). Jean Merritt and the staff of Collier County Department of Public Information were extremely supportive and helpful. The enclosed videotape, Appendix G, contains some of Channel 54's broadcast highlights on this issue. 16J Z GOAL: The Committee recommends that the Board of County Commissioners establish a Health Care Goal for Collier County as follows: TO PROVIDE BETTER HEATH CARE TO MORE PEOPLE FOR LESS MONEY. BASIC PRINCIPLES: The Committee has been guided in its recommendations by the following basic principals: • Establish a clear Long Term Objective; • Divide the Long Term Objective into prioritized, affordable increments that can be integrated with other County spending priorities. (As someone once said, "Don't let the Perfect be the enemy of the Good); • Ensure the adopted solution is sustainable year after year. • Maximize County enrollment in existing and any new State and Federal health care programs; • Acknowledge that this is a local problem and that neither the State nor Federal governments are going to provide sufficient incremental funding to solve it for us (See Appendix H from Sen. Burt Saunders); • Learn from the experiences of other communities, especially in Florida; • Facilitate communication and coordination among providers of uncompensated health care services; • Advocate "Fair Share" volunteerism from both organizations and individuals; • Simplify the process and paperwork for both patients and providers; • Measure results; • Strive for continuous improvement. RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Establish "100% Access" as Collier County's Long Term Health Care Objective. Every resident has an equal right to access our full health care system, regardless of how the provider is ultimately compensated; 16J 2 2. Adopt an Action Plan to achieve the Objective in prioritized, incremental steps. This layered approach is supported by David Rogoff (Appendix 1), a health care industry consultant who helped implement the Hillsborough County plan and assisted the Committee (at no cost to the County) in evaluating program and funding options. The layered, incremental approach can be represented conceptually with a pyramid. / Mental`, Health Longer Term Dental Health Health Care Needs In Patient Services Specialty Care Services Ind. Medicatims Expand School Nurse Program Primary, Preventive Health Care 1 Incl. Gynecology, Lab Services and Medications 1. Priority f+ Outreach for Medicaid/Healthy Kids Starting 2001 -02 Maintain Existing School Nurse Program 3. Dedicate a 0.1 mil ad valorem tax increase in the FY 2001 -02 Bud eg t of avDroximately $2.8 Million (subiect to final Countv�rov irty valuation) to improve health care access for all Collier County residents. (For homes assessed net of homestead exemption at $100,000 this would be an incremental cost of $10 /yr; for homes assessed at $250,000 an incremental cost of $25 /yr.; for homes assessed at $500,000 an incremental cost of $50 /yr.; and for homes assessed at $1 million an incremental cost of $100 per year.) • Preserve the present School Nurse program in Collier County Schools Estimated Cost: $250.000; • Fund aggressive enrollment programs or both Medicaid and Healthy Kids Estimated Cost: $50.000; • Initially, develop a coordinated system to provide Primary Health Care services for about 7,000 of the 20,000 (35%) adult Collier County residents, ages 19 -64, whose household incomes are below 200% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines ($34,100 for a family of four) by contracting with existing health care providers Estimated Cost: $2.1 Million annually. or $300 /aatient/year; 16J 2'1 • Hire a Medical Director and patient case managers who would be directed by an oversight Board representing interested community constituencies Estimated Cost: 5300.000 annually; One time startup expenses including acquiring computer software and hardware for: patient registration and tracking; and integrating a referral system from Primary Care Physicians to Specialists similar for the "We Care" programs implemented in several Florida counties Estimated Cost: $100,000; The Health Care Planning and Finance Committee believes that a contingent Budget authorization for the FY 2001 -02 is essential because of 1) the seriousness of health care needs of low income County residents, especially children; 2) the extraordinary, unsustainable pressure on our hospital Emergency Rooms, especially "in season" that puts every County resident at risk; However, before any portion of the FY 2001 -02 Budget could be went Coun Commissioners must an rove program specifics which are partially, but not fully, defined as of this date, including: • established monthly budget projections, with line item detail; • defined outreach strategies for Medicaid and Healthy Kids; • defined patient eligibility criteria and benefits package for Primary Health Care services; • defined sliding -scale co-payments, if any, for patients in excess off 100% FPG; • defined plans for patient enrollment, I.D. cards and case management; • recommended source(s) for contracted Primary Health Care services, including a prescription drug plan; • created or acquired computer -based patient referral system from Primary Care Physicians to Specialists which has the support of the Collier County Medical Society; • proposed job descriptions for any recommended hires; • recommended membership and responsibilities of a Board that would oversee, on an ongoing basis: the implementation of this program and any improvements in process, benefits, and/or eligibility. The Committee estimates that it could take up to eight months to complete these specifics and to secure Commissioners' final approval. This delay would, of course, diminish the cash flow impact of the program in FY 2001 -02. 4. Once the Primary Health Care program is established and cost estimates are confirm - Ed by experience. eland coverage from about 35% of income-eligible patients in FY 16J 2 2001 -02 to 100% of income-eligible patients through incremental funding subsequent fiscal years. Based on the experiences of other counties, once previously uninsured individuals have a "medical home" and pre - existing conditions are either treated or referred to a specialist, the annual per patient cost of Primary Care drops by as much as 45% and the patient's focus shifts from treatment to prevention. 5. Once all income-eligible patients are covered by the Primary Care Program, expand benefits package starting with an expansion of the School Nurse Program_ to include the other benefits described alone and working up on the pyramid of priorities Some might argue that aU specifics shoWd be finalized before any County approval is eiven; however. the Committee believes that the expressed willingness of the County to fund a portion of these expenses through a Public/Private partnership is a prereauisite to reachine consensus through negotiation and compromise with all interested parties. Without a proactive commitment from County Government, the status quo will continue and the lives of all County residents from the poor to the wealthy will remain, unnecessarily, at risk. Your approval is recommended. rJ� Thomas Schneider, Chairman APPENDICES A. Summary of Health Care Review Committee's Final Report B. Summary of Health Care Planning and Finance Committee's work to date C. Excerpts from COmmuniri Initiative for the Uninsured: How Far Can Public/Private Partnefts Take Us? D Letter from Dr. Robert Tober re: Emergency Room Crisis E. Letter from Steve Rasnick re: indirect tax, or cost shift, caused by present system F. Reprints of Naples Daily News articles re: Town Hall Meeting G. Videotape of Channel 54 programming on health care for the uninsured H. Letter from Sen. Burt Saunders re: likelihood of incremental state funding I. Letter from David Rogof� consultant, supporting incremental, layered approach Appendix A April 12, 2001 Summary of Final Report of Health Care Review Committee (Dated September 2000) Two years ago the Board of Collier County Commissioners formed an ad hoc Collier County Health Care Review Committee to review existing health care systems in Collier County and to determine whether access to health care is available to all residents of Collier County. The Committee completed its efforts and issued its final report to the Board in September 2000. The Committee's final report painted a troubling but accurate picture of unmet health care needs in Collier County. Over 30,000 Collier County residents under age 64 are without any form of health insurance coverage, private or government- sponsored; up to 6,000 of them are children. The Committee's report emphasized that access to health care in Collier County is a serious community -wide problem for substantial segments of our local population and requires a community -wide solution. Despite the generous efforts of the local hospitals, physicians, and other local health care providers, and the extensive philanthropy of an extremely generous community, significant gaps in access to health care remains and continues to grow. There is no coordinated system for providing primary, preventative care to these uninsured poor. These uninsured do not have a medical home. Care that is received is fragmented, short term, emergency driven and usually delivered much too late and in the emergency room. There is almost no opportunity for early detection of chronic and life - threatening illnesses. Often, hospitalization is required for an avoidable condition. This pattern of care is the major cause of our overcrowded emergency rooms and shortage of hospital beds, particularly in season, that is a dangerous threat to every resident of Collier County, rich or poor. Throughout the US almost 85% of the uninsured are part of a family unit with one or more members working. In Collier County independent studies of local inpatient charity care provided by local hospitals confirm that over 90% of their charity care costs was incurred treating poor uninsured men and women between the ages of 19 -64. Cost of insurance is the overwhelming reason given for lack of health insurance coverage. Many of the working poor do not have access to health insurance provided by their employer, or if they do, it is unaffordable to them. And, government - sponsored insurance programs generally do not cover adults between the ages of 19 -64. 16J 2 The Committee studied how other local communities have dealt with this issue, and found several success stories both here in Florida and elsewhere. These communities developed public /private partnerships to create win -win outcomes. They created coordinated systems of care emphasizing primary and preventative care, which substantially improved the health and quality of life of their working poor, improved their work productivity and significantly reduced the unnecessary and inappropriate use of emergency rooms. And, most importantly, these communities did it in a cost effective manner, by creating managed care networks for the working poor and leveraging the power of group purchasing to negotiate favorable rates with local health care providers. The Health Care Review Committee recommended that the Board seek ways to provide a safety net of funding to enable some type of public /private partnership to be created in Collier County that would allocate responsibility for providing health care services and for financial support among all involved constituencies — the local hospitals, physicians and other health care providers; the business community; and the citizens of Collier County. The Committee also recommended that the Board appoint a second committee to lead a community-wide health planning effort, to seek solutions to these serious access issues, to estimate the costs of these solutions, and to make appropriate recommendations to the Board. The Board reacted decisively by forming a second ad hoc committee, The Collier County Community Health Care Planning and Finance Committee. This Committee is comprised of active and retired business leaders, financial executives, physicians and other health care providers. The Health Care Planning and Finance Committee has been working diligently since November 2000. Appendix B includes more detail on its efforts, progress and findings to date. 16J 2 Appendix B April 12, 2001 The Health Care Planning and Finance Committee Summary Description of Organization, Progress, Findings and Interim Recommendations Formation: The Health Care Planning and Finance Committee was formed in October 2000 by the Board of County Commissioners, at the request of the Health Care Review Committee. Its charter was to lead a community -wide health care planning effort and to identify solutions to the health care access issues identified by the previous committee. This committee was to also estimate the costs of implementing the recommended solutions and to recommend how to allocate such costs among all constituencies. Membership: The committee is comprised of active and retired business leaders, financial executives, physicians and other health care providers. The Committee has two distinct groups of members, voting and ex- officio members. No health care providers or government officials are voting members. The individual members are listed at the end of this appendix. Organization: Various subcommittees were formed to conduct most of the efforts of the Committee. These subcommittees include: Models Coalition with Constituencies Communications Finance School Nursing Healthy Kids Coalition Executive Progress: Starting with its initial meeting in November, 2000, the Committee and its subcommittees have conducted in excess of 25 publicly posted meetings open to the public under the Florida Sunshine Laws. In addition, members have met with and made presentations to numerous community and civic organizations, including the Chamber of Commerce, The President's Council, Greater Naples Civic Association, The Community Foundation, The League of Women 16J 2 Voters, Greater Naples Leadership and. The Committee sponsored a Town Hall Meeting in March and the Chair addressed "Wake Up Naples" sponsored by the Chamber of Commerce. The purpose of all these meetings was to seek input from the community on unique issues that need to be addressed and opinions and concerns of the community. We also wanted to raise the awareness level within the community as to the nature and extent of the health care access issue. Various committee members also participated in regional and national conferences on the subject of the uninsured in Miami, Tampa and Ashville, NC. The Models committee continued the work of its predecessor committee, expanding both the number of other successful programs studied and the depth of detail studied. The subcommittee held several conference calls with leaders of other successful programs and made site visits to Palm Beach, Hillsborough, Leon and Buncombe counties. Members have also studied numerous articles and reports discussing this issue and the many creative approaches other local communities have taken to solve a similar problem. This committee clearly has attempted to involve the entire community in its deliberations of this complex and serious community -wide issue and is seeking and evaluating potential solutions. In addition to focusing on our ultimate recommended solution, we have devoted substantial effort in leveraging the influence of being a Board - appointed committee to effect beneficial change in two short term issues, maintaining and enhancing the school nursing program and maximizing the leverage of state and federal dollars for the Medicaid and Healthy Kids programs through bigger and better outreach efforts. This is also consistent with the Board's charge to us that we seek ways to maintain and maximize existing community assets and the leverage of outside funding, including federal and state tax revenues and grants. The Committee also identified a highly qualified health care consultant and engaged his services at no cost to the County. We received funding from the federal and state governments. This consultant, David Rogoff, has been very helpful to our Committee, ensuring that we cast a wide enough net when seeking other successful models to study, and facilitating our deliberations and focusing our discussions in developing our vision for a solution and in estimating related costs. David's preliminary report on his findings and recommendations is included in this report as Appendix E. Preliminary Findings and Recommendation: The Committee recently agreed on a preliminary vision of an ultimate solution for Collier County, subject to much more work that is needed before putting it into a formal recommendation it to the Board. This vision includes a public/private partnership to create a coordinated system of comprehensive care for all uninsured with incomes below 200% of Federal Poverty Guidelines. 16J 2 The Committee also agreed on a recommendation to the Board that it begin now to implement an incremental, phased —in approach by funding one tenth of a mil of ad valorem taxes in the upcoming budget cycle for fiscal year beginning September 1, 2001. We believe this would allow for establishing a public /private partnership to begin developing on a contractual basis a coordinated system of primary, preventative care for a sizable portion of the target uninsured population in the County's next fiscal year. We realize there is much yet to be done before the first dollar would be spent in implementing this recommendation. We expect to accomplish all that is required in the months ahead, much of it during the normal County budget cycle and process. We will then make another formal report and come back to the Board for a full discussion. The details of our preliminary vision and current recommendation, and detailed support for the recommendation and estimated costs of implementation are described elsewhere in this report. This recommendation for an incremental approach is made in recognition that there are other conflicting priorities within the community requiring current and future funding from local tax revenues. It also allows for the program to begin sooner and in controllable steps that will allow for verification of estimated benefits and costs and fine tuning while still at a smaller level. We are quite confident at this point in the estimated costs to implement our highest priority. We will continue our research and deliberations until we are equally confident in our ultimate vision and its related costs. We also recommend that the Board expand our Committee's legal existence for another year after the original expiration date. We will need this time to conclude our research of other models and related estimated costs, to continue to engage the community and raise awareness levels as to this complex issue, and to help in the formation of the recommended public/ private partnership and the coordinated system of care. We will ultimately recommend that our Committee be replaced with a standing advisory committee to oversee the new programs and to report to the Board on these and related health care issues. i County Health Care 16J 2 Collier Cou Planning and .Finance Committee an Ad Hoc Committee of the Board of Collier County Commissioners Members Thomas G. Schneider, Chairman Mike Davis, Vice Chairman J.D. Campbell Anthony DiNardo ` Crystal Kinzel Joseph Mania Paul Neuharth, M.D. Kathleen Passidomo, Esq. Steve Rasnick Robert Schmidt Jim Tindall Ex- Officio Richard Aiken Ron Burris Joan Colfer, M.D. Mary Cooper Tim Davis, M.D. Fielding Epstein Charles Eytel, M.D. Stephen Fain Carol Girardin Harry Moon, M.D. Edward Morton Mike Smykowski Wendy Wilderman Liaison Susan Craig Mark Crowley Leo Ochs Administration Maria Snyder Office: C/O Collier County Health Department P.O. Box 429 Naples, FL 34106 Phone: (941) 530 -5334 Fax: (941) 774 -5653 community initiatives for the Uninsured APPENDIX C cpmmunity initiatives for the Uninsured Contra Costa Health Plan: Basic Adult, Care Proeram — Contra Costa CA 16J 2 µ A� CU CARE -- Denver, CO I I i I lsborough County I Teal thCare Plan Ifillsborough County Fl AT" CARL: Jacksonville, Inc. —Jacksonville, FL zr Public; Private Partnerships - Los Angeles, C;1 W ishard Advmitage = Marion County,. IN General Assistance Medical Program— Milwaukee County NkIl General Assistance Medical Care- MN State Department of Hunuln Services NYSNfPP —New York State L),oartment of Health Small Business Health Insurance New York. NY' Saint Louis ConnectCare Health System - St. Lewis, MO Carelink - San Antonia TX Slielbv County Primary Health Care Nctwork - Shelby Coumy, TN I- lealthChoice -- Wayne County, MI P1usCare - Wavne County, M} Washington Basic Health Plan - Waslvneton State Section 3. Contacts 3 -1 Bibliography [ http: / /vwvw.rwjf.org /*f- library- temp /community!toc.htm (2 of 2) [11/7/2000 11:23:04 AM] community initiatives for the Uninsured EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16J 2 http:llwww.rwif.org /rwjf- library- temp /community /exe- summ.htm (1 of 4) [1117/2000 11:23:22 AM) The large and increasing number of uninsured in the United States and the failure of any major healthcare reform at the national level have led many communities to design and implement a number of innovative approaches to health services for this population. While care for the uninsured at the local level has been common throughout the history of this country, many of the more recent efforts are distinguished in several ways, including more organized, coordinated t. delivery of care, public- private collaboration, and financial commitment that has provided a significant level of stability. This report documents,, profiles and assesses twenty organized health care initiatives for the uninsured in the US, conducted through extensive interviews with nearly 100 community i representatives, site visits, and review of related documents. Their selection, which was based on regional representation, program maturity, financial support and other factors, was intended to provide a current cross - section of local efforts for the uninsured. The case studies of each site and the synthesis offer information for communities considering undertaking similar initiatives,_ and to decision makers at the state and national levels interested in developing and supporting policies f for-the uninsured. This executive summary highlights major conclusions and lessons learned from these twenty sites according to the areas of investigation included in each case study. i I. Program Structure 1. Communities use a broad range of public and private agencies to oversee their initiatives, with public dollars representing the primary source of support. County or city offices have frequently been designated the primary responsible organization, but some communities have created new private agencies that assume the lead role. Both public and a private providers frequently participate in the provision of services, which are supported with public monies. 2. Many programs have developed, expanded networks of providers that link or extend the historic safety-net for the uninsured. Communities have frequently reorganized, expanded and increased coordination of services for the uninsured through these programs. Many local programs have created new public- private partnerships among providers in their areas, sometimes refocusing efforts to include primary care clinics and community health centers as well as one or more hospitals. 3. Most communities have chosen to use elements of managed care in organizing their services, but few have adopted a full managed care design. Communities have tended to use a variety of managed care components, including establishing related contracts with providers, developing similar administrative mechanisms and incorporating traditional managed care -type payment systems. H. Eligibility and Enrollment 1. While all programs incorporate low- income uninsured, many communities have taken this opportunity to target certain subgroups of uninsured individuals for special health care focus. Low- income residents at or below 200% of poverty is the most common level of coverage among the community initiatives; with a number targeting the working poor. Many of these programs http:llwww.rwif.org /rwjf- library- temp /community /exe- summ.htm (1 of 4) [1117/2000 11:23:22 AM) ,Ommunity initiatives-for the Uninsured include immigrants as well. 16J 2 2. Enrollment tends to occur at the point of contact with the health system, with a few developing more aggressive outreach and marketing efforts. Initiatives usually allow a six -month enrollment period. A number of communities that are concerned about levels of enrollment qualify individuals only when they use the health system. Outreach and marketing are very limited among these types of programs, while a minority market programs through community fairs and other means. III. Financing L Most communities have elected to use several sources of local and state- federal support to finance their programs, including new and existing mechanisms to provide stable base. Property or sales taxes are often major financing streams for community -based initiatives. But many also have redirected dollars from existing sources such as Medicaid support to providers caring for large numbers of low income patients (i.e., disproportionate share hospital payments). 2. Provider payments range from fee for service to capitated rates. Provider payments are tailored both within and between programs, with, for example, physicians and clinics receiving capitated payments while specialists are reimbursed fee- for - service, and hospitals by negotiated fee- for - service rates. 3. Most programs require patients to share in the costs of their care. Enrollees contribute financially by participating in cost sharing through sliding scale premiums and/or copayments. A broad range of settings employ one or both of these mechanisms. IV. Scope of Services 1. Almost all initiatives offer a wide range of benefits to enrollees but place restrictions to control costs. Sites tend to offer a quite comprehensive set of services for qualified and enrolled individuals with limits placed especially on mental health and substance abuse treatment. While drugs tend to be deeply discounted, concerns have arisen about the high costs of prescription drugs. These concerns have led to some benefit restrictions. V Quality 1. Measurement and monitoring of program quality is a core part of several initiatives, with the majority of them using existing indicator designs..' Many sites require that participating plans and/or providers operate quality; assurance for uninsured enrollees as part of their overall- review,or specific to this population. Evidence of effect among a number of these programs, while limited in many cases, suggests reductions in emergency room use, improved triaging of patient and improved coordination of care. VI. Conclusions These community initiatives for the uninsured reveal a diversity of design that demonstrates great adaptability to accommodate to the unique circumstances of each area. This flexibility, whether it be in the provider participation, financing, service organization or uninsured population priorities, accounts for the success or promise they have come to represent. Of equally critical importance, however, is the dedication, dynamism and ingenuity in evidence within each setting. Although these programs are all tailored to individual needs and circumstances, this review has http: / /www.rwjf.org /rwjf- library- temp /community /exe- summ.htm (2 of 4) (11,712000 11:23:22 AMl 16J C,ammunity initiatives for the Uninsured 2, revealed core achievements that cut across most sites and highlight how they have extended beyond the traditional way of delivering care for the uninsured. These include: • Building new bridges and relationships between the government and the private sector; • Effective targeting of patient care to neglected uninsured individuals; • Creating working models of organized systems of care for the uninsured; e Reducing costs and inappropriate use of services; e Maintaining a safety net where disruption has occurred; • Building new relationships with the community and neighborhoods where the uninsured reside; and i Developing a strong political foundation for community initiatives. Other lessons learned from these innovative programs and partnerships provide additional experience for communities and governments. They include the importance of matching available dollars with eligibility and demand; identifying potential existing and new financial sources to support these initiatives; determining how extensively programs will be marketed to the uninsured; educating enrollees on how to use services; applying the elements of managed care flexibly to meet administrative, financial and program objectives; determining the range and scope of services covered; and implementing quality assurance measures for this population. Finally, it is important to reinforce how consistent and relatively stable political and financial support are vital to the success of these partnerships and remain a continuing point of concern. With these elements firmly in place, community initiatives for the uninsured can prosper knowing that assistance for their current work is assured and their future is secure. The lack of that assurance may lead to a "program fragility ", threatening both their long- term`prospects and capacity for growth. Opportunities to strengthen and expand these public- private partnerships can improve service systems for the uninsured in ways that provide benefits for both the individuals and for other communities seeking workable models and guidance in developing or improving services to this historically neglected population, http:!,Iwww-rwjf.org/rwjf-library-temp/community/exe-summ.htm (3 of 4) (111712000 11:23:22 AM) communitY initiatives for the Uninsured project summary-intro Section 1. Project Summary 16J 2 Introduction and Objectives After nearly six years of dormancy following the defeat of the President Clinton's Health Security Act, the issue of access to health care is back on the national policy agenda. ). Indicative of this reemergence the American Medical Association pledged to make universal access to health care the "number one priority in the 2000 presidential election" (Guiden, 1999), and on January 19, 2000, President Clinton proposed a 10 -year, $110 billion initiative to expand access to health (White House Press Release, 1/ 19/00. While action by the federal government may once again be on the horizon, communities across the country have been reexamining the ways that they provide care for the uninsured and other vulnerable populations (Norton and Lipson, 1998b). Like other health care concerns, reconsideration of indigent care responsibilities is being driven by emphasis on cost reductions, reassessment of the role of government in health care, managed care, and a heightened interest in exploring public- private partnerships (Andrulis, 1997). This latter influence is not new. That is, ' many governments and private providers have reached agreement, either tacitly or directly, in the provision of health care services for many years. These agreements take many forms: direct contracting for care; subsidization through state and local sources; transferring support from public hospitals that closed or converted to non -profit status; and de facto assumption of such responsibilities after withdrawal of public support. These government - private sector agreements have occurred in areas both with and without public hospitals. Some have been in place for years. Others have more recent origins, driven by recent changes in Medicaid managed care and increased state flexibility in the allocation of related funds. These efforts have taken on more importance as communities reassess both the application of government support from all levels, and the shape of the safety -net in the context of improving access to care for the uninsured. They may also become more critical in areas contemplating or taking actions affecting publicly financed safety -net providers (Buchmueller and Phillips, 1998; Norton and Lipson, 1998a and 1998b). However, other than anecdotal, small scale or single profiles, little documentation of these public - private community initiatives and partnerships for the uninsured has occurred to date. The objective of this report is to document, profile, and assess the value of public - private community initiatives and partnerships that share financial and service responsibility for health care to vulnerable: populations and, in particular, the uninsured. It presents information on the origins of these programs, their objectives, target, populations, content, enrollment strategies, services, operations, achievements, and challenges. The programs described in this report do not represent an exhaustive set of all the public- private community initiatives and partnerships across the county. We have, however, selected twenty -sites that are representative of many of the formal community -level programs for the uninsured underway across the United States. These twenty sites were selected to illustrate the major categories of community -level initiatives and partnerships for the uninsured. We believe that these programs offer a "period in time" portrait of how communities have elected to directly address or enhance health care for this population as well as the success they have achieved to date using public and private collaboration to meet the needs of uninsured residents. To provide a fuller perspective on such initiatives, we have also included a few examples where state support plays 'a major role. The information generated by this project is designed for two purposes. First, by describing the methods and common principles across communities, we believe it may assist communities http: / /www.rwjf.org /rwjf- library- temp /community /secl- intro.htm (1 of 2) [11/712000 11:23:34 AM] community initiatives for the Uninsured project summary-intro J 2 interested in developing or redesigning their strategies for the uninsured, focusing on joint responsibility with public and private sectors. Secondly, the design and strategies as well as related challenges and achievements may guide government at all levels in targeting assistance for certain communities and creating or expanding initiatives in other areas. Report Organization This report is organized into the following four sections: • Section 1, Project Summary, presents a synthesis of the experiences of the twenty sites. It identifies patterns occurring across several sites as well as variations in program characteristics (e.g. levels of coverage). • Section 2, Profiles, presents the 20 cases profiled in this project. • Section 3, Contacts, presents the names and telephone numbers of the participants from each site in this study. e ` The Bibliography, is the final section of the report. htip: / /www.rwjf.org /rwjf- library- temp /community /secl- intro,htm (2 of 2) [1 1M2000 11:23:34 AM] cornmunity initiatives for the Uninsured 16J Design and Methodology To identify the public - private collaborations in this study, the project team performed a literature search, and conducted extensive phone conversations with federal, state, and local government officials and private sector professionals who are familiar with community efforts on behalf of the uninsured. In all, over 30 programs and proposals were documented. Criteria for Selecting the Site Study Group As discussed, the sites selected for the project, while not exhaustive, were intended to represent many of the major "initiatives that communities had undertaken to finance, organize, and provide health care for their uninsured residents. In addition to this objective, six criteria guided the decisions for inclusion in the site study group (Figure 1): 1. Period of operation, targeting programs that for the most part came into being during the 1990s, but allowing for a small number of older and new programs. Four are older than ten years, eight are at least five years in existence. 2. Regional representation, including the four primary census regions. 3. Explicit commitment of financial support for a formal program, wherein state/local government in particular had directed specific assistance for the program, frequently for an indefinite period. This criterion eliminated, for example, smaller, single institution redirection of some support or programs intended to endafter.a few years. 4. Significant poverty population, due primarily to the importance of a critical number of uninsured and the fact that these locations were most likely to devote financial assistance for such initiatives. We did include two smaller area programs (populations between 200,000- 300,000), but with substantial numbers of individuals in poverty, that expanded model representation. 5. Closure/conversion of a public hospital, while not occurring in all cases, this played a key role in these programs in seven sites. 6. Managed care design, with the majority of sites utilizing at least some characteristics of managed care but few creating a formal, more complete managed care structure. While these criteria provided the structure for selection, flexibility in application offered the opportunity to adapt to the -reality of these community efforts: In particular, our inclusion of state supported efforts (e.g., Washington, Minnesota) and the federal role in Los Angeles County, offer other perspectives on goventment assistance for uninsured initiatives. Finally, it is important to note that one of the few resources on this issue, a 1996 descriptive report by the National Public Health and Hospital Institute (NPHHI), assisted the project team in identifying a subset of existing programs. This project updated, significantly expanded, and evaluated those documented by NPHHI. Including several of the sites in the NPHRI list also allowed for comparison of program changes over time among these established programs. The following table presents the summary of the study site characteristics: Table 1 -1. Study Site Characteristics Program Name (Location) Population" Percent in Program Public Hospital Poverty" Age Closure or Conversion County Medically Indigent Services Plan 1,400,322 11 -3% 1983 Yes (Alameda County, CA) .Community Care Plan (Birmingham, AL) 252,997 16.0% 1998N Boston HealthNef (Pilot) Plan (Boston, MA) 555,447 10.0% ; 1995 Yes r BCMS Project Access 194,873 12.2% 1997 No (Buncombe County, Il NC) F_ Contra Costa Health Plan (Contra Costa, CAj 916,200 7.9% 1979 No 499.055 17.0% 1995 Yes CU Care (Denver, CO) Hillsborough County Health Plan 925,277 16.5% 1991 Yes (Hillsborough County, FL) 1: , r http: / /www.rwif.org /rw#- library- temp /community /sect- design.htm 0 of 3) [11/7/2000 11:23:39 AM] community initiatives for the Uninsured 16J 2 WE CARE Jacksonville (Jacksonville, FL) I 693,630 F 14.59/6 1995 No Public Private Partnerships (Los Angeles, 9,213,533 P2.7%1 1997 No Wishard Advantage (Marion County, IN) 813,405 12.7% 1997 No , GAMP (Milwaukee County, WI) 911,713 16.1% 1995 Yes GAMIC (Minnesota State) 4,775,508 8.7 °!° F 1986 NA NYSHIPP,(New York State) __F 60 18,196,1 15.8 °4 1989 NA SBHL(New York, NY) Saint Louis ConnectCare Health System (Saint Louis, MO) 7,420,166 998,696 22.7% 7.3% 1999 1997 No Yes Carelink (San Antonio, TX) Shelby County Primary Health Care Network (Shelby County, TN) 1,353,052, 868,825 19.4% 1 18.7% 1996 1999 No No HealthChoice (Wayne County, MI) 2,118,129 20.6% 1994. Yes PlusCare (Wayne County, Ml) 2,118,129 20.6% 1992 Yes Washington Basic Health Plan (Washington State) 5,756,361 10.8% 1993 NA *Bureau of the Census estimates. State population estimates for 7/1199; County and City Population estimates for 711/98 ** Bureau of the Census estimates as of July 1996. Telephone Interviews The project team developed and conducted a telephone survey with key officials at the selected communities. These individuals included: public and private hospital representatives; local hospital /health care associations; state and local government officials; and managed care plan professionals at these sites. The project team created, pilot tested, and used a formal telephone interview instrument designed specifically to capture the following information: • Program history and development • Program structure, including service design and provider participants • Scope, including population served and target population estimates • Financial arrangements for provider payment, program support and client cost- sharing • Enrollment,: including requirements, limitations, length of each program t • Services offered and excluded as well as quality assurance actions • Administration and administrative costs • Successes and challenges related to the programs. t For each of these programs, the project team interviewed the director or equivalent senior staff person, with two or more interviews occurring in almost all sites. When possible, we'also contacted a knowledgeable member of the community, either a provider or an advocate for the uninsured. Each interview lasted between 45 minutes and 2 hours and was followed by requests for written material about the program. When available, we asked program staff to share` `s copies of annual, reports, enrollment and budget data, brochures and other marketing material, and formal evaluations. The project team offered all to each of the groups that participated in the telephone interviews the opportunity to reviev site profile drafts. Their comments were taken into account before developing the final site description included in this report. In- Person Interviews In addition tq the telephone interviews, the project team conducted on -site meetings with program officials and community representatives at six programs: The County Medical Services Plan (CMSP) in Alameda, CA; Boston HealthNet (Pilot) Program; Carelink in Bexar County, TX; General Assistance Medical Plan (DAMP) in Milwaukee, Wl; the Public Private Partnership Program (PPP) in Los Angeles, CA and the Small Business Health Insurance http: / /www.rwjf.org /rwjf- library- temp /community /sect- design.htm (2 of 3) [11/7/2000 11:23:39 AM] co rnmunity initiatives for the Uninsured 16J (SBHI) plan in New York, NY. We selected these sites based on regional representation, variability in arrangements (e.g., institution - based, county administered), and safety net status. The purpose of the in- person interviews was to add dimension and expansion to the telephone survey responses by reviewing those responses at the community level. The visits acted as a "validity check to the telephone survey and gave us the opportunity to discuss the programs with individuals within organizations not reached through the telephone interview. Finally, the in- person interviews added relevant documentation on the programs. next s; { t 4 h~p:l /www.rwjf.org /rwjf- library- temp /community /secl- design.htm (3 of 3) [1 V712000 11:23:39 AM] community initiatives for the Uninsured 2 portrait of Public Private Partnerships for the Uninsured 6 V is section summarizes characteristics of the programs examined by this study and categorizes their major features. Although ese programs have much in common as measured by design, populations of concern and challenges, the most striking eature of this sample is their diversity. The programs vary in or are in different phases of program structure, including the tent that they use managed care, eligibility and enrollment process, financing mechanisms, the scope of services available, ` d the extent to which they have formal quality assurance programs and measures. rogn► Structure expected, communities and their participating sources of support, government and otherwise, established programs that onstrate a broad range of content, service participants, and managed care emphasis. 6e role of managed care. The programs span a spectrum from physician voluntarism efforts that are supported by a small l of public funds to state licensed programs designed to care for the uninsured. For the majority, however, managed care or elements plays a role in the organization or operation of the uninsured programs. In five of these programs the ocal or state ve�nment contracts with managed' care organizations (MCO) to provide care to the uninsured. In five other cases, the rogram involves an MCO or health plan formed by a local government or local safety -net institution. ithin these programs, the term "managed care organization" is defined somewhat loosely. For example, the P1usCare ogram:n Wayne County, MI has developed arrangements with a variety of "contractors," but not exclusively with HMOs or ther managed care organizations. Similarly, only two of the managed care plans formed by local government or safety-net rations are state Iicerised HMOs. The Boston Medical Center's Boston HealthNet (Pilot) Program and Carelink are both i�heaIth plans. Carelink navigates between being a health plan and a financial assistance plan. Like the Pilot Plan in stop, it is not licensed as an HMO, but it uses a number of managed care techniques to administer care for its patients. a few of the programs, the County government contracts with a network of private community-based clinics to provide rimary care to uninsured residents. In Milwaukee, this network developed in response to the closing of the County public ospitahI tn.contrast; Los Angeles continues to operate a public hospital and a network of County clinics -in addition to having ntracts,with `a large network of private clinics. 6,0 the programs profiled in this study offer low -cost health insurance coverage to small or mid -size employers that do of currently provide health insurance to their employees. Despite these similarities, the programs, HealthChoice, NYSHIPP, d SBRI, are quite different. SBHI is a health insurance product developed by the New York City Health and Hospitals opporation (HHC) and a private insurer. This program offers its enrollees access to a limited network of HHC facilities. rfrollees'in the HealthChoice and NYSHIPP programs have a choice of health plans. Managed care also is a core component the service arrangement in these' programs. inally, managed care, plays less of a central role in the volunteer programs. Project Access in Buncombe County, NC and WE RE Jacksonville in Jacksonville, FL. In these areas, money from local government and'other sources has been used to eilitate and coordinate physician voluntarism efforts on behalf of the uninsured. r}mary responsible organization. A broad range of public and private agencies and institutions oversee theseprograms. In vera} settings (e.g., Boston, Birmingham, San Antonio) hospitals have initiated or have been designated the primary entity sponsible for the initiative. Other communities (Alameda, Los Angeles, Milwaukee) use a county or city service agency to onmAthis role, while some areas (e.g., St. Louis, Hillsborough) created new private agencies to direct the program. State gencies serve as the designees as well in Minnesota, New York, and Washington. ubIlic" private nature of the, collaborations. The programs tend to involve public dollars and services provided by both blic and private sectors. In most of the programs (15) there is joint responsibility for the administrative responsibility tween public and private sectors. Many came about through the joint planning and cooperation between the public and rivate sectors (e.g. Alameda, Buncombe, Marion, and Shelby Counties). ervice network. Several communities have used their uninsured initiative as an opportunity to develop or broaden the etwork of providers serving -and supported for serving— uninsured residents. Alameda, Hillsborough, Los Angeles, lwaukee, St., Louis have developed arrangements with other hospitals and community clinics. Other programs (Boston, on County, New York City, San Antonio) reinforce the role of the public sector providers. The State programs allow lain or designated community organizations to determine which public and private providers participate in the plans. http: / /www.rwjf.org /rw#- library - temp /community /secl- portrait,htm (1 of 7) [111712000 11:23:44 AM) community initiatives for the Uninsured } Eligibility and Enrollment 16J 2 All of the programs in the study are targeted to low- income, uninsured residents. In many cases (nine), the program is limited to individuals with incomes below 200 % of the Federal Poverty Guidelines (FPG). Although five programs do not have explicit income eligibility limits, program objectives and design make it clear that all of these programs target low- income residents (Table 1 -2). The Washington Basic Health Plan (WBHP), for example, focuses primarily on individuals and families below 200% of FPG It also extends to anon- subsidized component of the program for employers who do not currently provide health insurance to their employees. (According to state officials, the non - subsidized portion of the program has not been successful. Enrollment among non-subsidized members has dropped, from a high of over 25,000 in 1997 to just over 7,000 in 1999, with large premium increases for these members in recent years). Two prograrns'exclusively target the working poor. In New York City, the Health and Hospitals Corporation, in partnership with Group Health Incorporated, has developed a low cost health insurance product that is available and marketed to small businesses in certain New York City neighborhoods and their employees. In Detroit, the Healthy Choice program is administered by the Patient Care Management System - the same 501(c)3 corporation that administers the P1usCare program' foruninsured residents with incomes of $250 or less per month'. To qualify for most of the programs, individuals must not be eligible for public insurance programs. These programs are designed to serve as "payers of last resort." As a result, they often incorporate screening for Medicaid and other government programs as part of the enrollment process. The following table; summarizes the income eligibility levels for the programs included in the study. Table 1 -2. Income Eligibility Levels Program Name Income Eligibility County Medically Indigent Services Plan (Alameda County) Less than 200% of FPG Community Care Plan (Birmingham) All uninsured County residents Boston HealthNet (Pilot) Plan (Boston) 200% of FPG for free care; Between 200% and 400% of FPG - sliding fee scale BCMS Project Access (Buncombe County) Less than 200% of FPG Contra Costa Health Plan (Contra Costa) $2061 gross monthly income CU Care (Denver) 185% of FPG Hillsborough County Health Plan (Hillsborough County) 100% of FPG , WE CARE Jacksonville (Jacksonville) 100% to 150% of FPG Public Private Partnerships (Los Angeles) 133% of FPG Wishard Advantage (Marion County) 200% of FPG GAMP (Milwaukee County) $800 gross monthly income GAMC (Minnesota) 70% of FPG NYSHIPP (New York State) 222 % of FPG SBHI (Newyork City) NA — businesses with 2 -50 employees in select zip codes http: /fwww.rwjf.org /rwjf- library- temp /community /secl- portrait.htm (2 of 7) (11 17/2000 11:23:44 AM) community initiatives for the Uninsured 16J 2 isured in their, communities. Not, all of the' most cases, the programs only provide care to itf of the initiatives can be described as "sickness iccess the health care system, iat must be met before an individual can be http: / /www.rwjf.org /rw#- library- temp /community /secl- portrait.htm (3 of 7) [1117/2000 11:23:44 AM] Saint Louis ConnectCare Health System (Saint Louis) All uninsured County residents - Program targets residents at 100% of FPG or below Carelink (San Antonio) - All uninsured County residents — Program targets, residents at 200° % -of FPG or below Shelby County Primary Health Care Network(Shelby All uninsured County residents County, TN) HealthChoice (Wayne County) Businesses in Wayne County with low -wage employees (Half of the eligible employees must make $101hour or less) P1usCare (Wayne County) $250 gross monthly income Washington Basic . 900%,6f FPG Health Plan (Washington State)'" isured in their, communities. Not, all of the' most cases, the programs only provide care to itf of the initiatives can be described as "sickness iccess the health care system, iat must be met before an individual can be http: / /www.rwjf.org /rw#- library- temp /community /secl- portrait.htm (3 of 7) [1117/2000 11:23:44 AM] i community initiatives for the Uninsured 16J , nthher common characteristic concerns re- enrollment requirements. In many cases, individuals must re- enroll in person at Ijnic, hospital or other designated sites. In some cases, places to enroll are very limited, though a number of programs are loving toward a mail in re- enrollment process (e.g. Marion County). For most programs, patients are required to resubmit ,come and residency documentation when they re- enroll for the program. The following table and chart present the irollment totals for the programs included in-the study: Table 1 -3. Enrollment Total Program Name Enrollment. County Medically Indigent Services Plan (Alameda County) 65,000 Community Care Plan (Birmingham) 3,000 ` Boston HealthNet (Pilot) Plan (Boston) 61,000 BCMS Project Access (Buncombe County) 13,000 Contra Costa Health Plan (Contra Costa) 4,000 CU Care (Denver) 12,000 Hillsborough County Health' Plan (Hillsborough County) 25,000 WE CARE Jacksonville (Jacksonville) NA Public Private Partnerships (Los Angeles) NA Wishard Advantage (Marion County) 20,000 GAMP (Milwaukee County) 18,000 GAMC (Minnesota) 31,000 NYSHIPP (New York State) 1,700 SBHI (New York City) 123 Saint Louis ConnectCare Health System (Saint Louis) F 30,000 Carelink (San Antonio), 62,000 Shelby County Primary Health Care Network (Shelby County, TN) NA HealthChoice (Wayne County) 16,032 PiusCare (Wayne County) 35,000 Washington Basic Health Plan (Washington State) 217,908 http: /fwww.rwjf.org /rwjf- library- temp /community/secl- portrait.htm (4 of 7) (11/7/2000 11:23:44 AM] community initiatives for the Uninsured 5 4 3 2 1 0 Chart 2 <10,000 10K 29K 30K -49K 50K -69K 70K+ Enrollment 16J 2 ni initiatives for the Uninsured 16J comma ty Hillsborough County Health Plan $43.1 million County New (Hillsborough County, FL) _ WE CARE Jacksonville (Jacksonville, FL) r$70,000 City New public Private`Partnerships (Los Angeles, $42 million Federal and County New CA) Wishard Advantage (Marion County, IN) $56 million (plus City and County Existing $20 million in (Federal DSH funds DSH funds) were used to capitalize the plan) " GAMP (Milwaukee County, WI) $38 million Fed my , State, and Existing " GAMC (Minnesota State) $137 million State New — New NYSHIPP (New York State) —$66 m- ill'ioon� State SBHI (New York, NY) ' NA NA NA Saint Louis ConnectCare Health System $38 million Federal, State, Existing" (Saint Louis, `MO) County, and City CareHnk (San Antonio, TX) $94 million Federal, State, and Existing County Shelby County Primary Health Care $4.2 million County and City Existing Network (Shelby County, TN) HealthChoice (Wayne County, Ml) $16.8 million Countyl, State, and New million Federal, State, and New PlusCare (Wayne County, Mt) $44 County Washington Basic Health Plan $11 million State New "(Washington State) Payments to providers. Methods to pay providers vary both between and within a number of programs. Some initiatives pay a capitated rate to physicians or clinics but reimburse fee - for - service to specialists. Others pay hospitals under one mechanism' and other providers' under another. For example, providers at the Contra Costa County public hospital and County primary care clinics are salaried employees of the County, but the community providers and'hospitals"tbat participate in the Basic Adult Care program are paid on a negotiated fee - for - service basis. Cost sharing., Most of the programs (15) use some form of cost sharing. The most common form of cost sharing is a sliding scale !premium based on income and family size. For example, Alameda uses a sliding fee schedule for patients with incomes between 100% and 2000% of FPG. Similarly, the Carelink program in San Antonio calculates a "maximum family liability" for patients with incomes over 75% of FPG. Several programs have co- payments for certain services. The small business health insurance programs each involve premiums, co- payments, and deductibles. Scope of Services The.programs offera wide range of benefits to th eir enrollees, but most provide a fairly comprehensive package that includes Outpatient, ' emergency, inpatient, and specialty care. Several programs (e.g., Marion County, Milwaukee) model the benefit Package for their indigent care program on the state's Medicaid program. Most of the programs also offer access to deeply discounted prescription drugs, though several programs have been forced to place restrictions on their drug benefit. httpillwww.rwif.org/rwjf- library- temp /community/sect- portrait.htm (6 of 7) [11[712000 11:23:44 AM) community initiatives for the Uninsured immunity initiatives for the Uninsured 16J Z Assessment of Public- Private Partnerships for the Uninsured Review of the primarily community -based programs in our study suggests that public and private sector provider organizations, in collaboration with local governments and, at times states, are using a remarkably diverse set of approaches for addressing health care for the uninsured. Their dedication and ingenuity have allowed development of creative strategies in many cases, bringing together or expanding relationships with funding entities, providers and managed care. Although many of the issues they face are idiosyncratic, they share success or achievements in key areas. At the same time, they also face common and, for some, formidable challenges that are important to the status, growth and survival of virtually all of these programs. Achievements Program achievements for communities and their stateilocal governments extend into many areas including caring for neglected populations, addressing needs of providers and developing more effective service strategies. Of these many successes, at least seven stand out as both common in many sites and noteworthy in their effect. Public and private partnerships. Many communities were able to use these initiatives as opportunities to build relationships between governments and the private sector as well as public providers. These new, negotiated agreements have reshaped the way in which the private sector has assumed responsibility for the uninsured, frequently integrating managed care design into the service' delivery structure. Affected public providers have taken a lead role in reorienting care for the uninsured, frequently in cooperation with other health care organizations. These efforts have meant new alliances or arrangements between communities, their governments, and health care. Effective targeting of patient care. Communities and governments have taken the opportunity of using many of these initiatives to target services to a particular neglected population or to residents who are most likely to be overlooked. Such groups include older single men and women, the chronically ill, and the working poor. In some cases they have conveyed a sense of patient empowerment by bringing them into a more mainstream system of care and reducing the uninsured stigma: through, for example, issuing a health care card and encouraging physicians to treat patients with greater respect. Creating organized systems of care for the uninsured. One of the key outcomes found among many sites is that these uninsured — for the first time in many cases —have access to a significantly more well- coordinated and developed system of care. Gatekeepers, primary care providers, medical homes, access to specialists, and other important features have led to the general conclusion that the uninsured who are able to participate are much better off. These efforts stand in stark contrast to the historically more typical piecemeal services and dependency on emergency rooms or settings where waiting times created great inconvenience and frequently discouraged those needing care. Ability to reduce costs. Some of the programs have either documented or affirm that they have reduced costs of care. Some (e.g., BCMS Project Access, Hillsborough' Health Care Plan) report a significant decrease in costs for the enrolled population. Others state that emergency room utilization for non- urgent care has declined. Maintenance of a safety-net in the wake of substantial disruption. The communities that have experienced closure or conversion of their public hospital or primary safety net organization have often used this initiative as an opportunity to significantly reconstruct the system for vulnerable populations in their communities. Some have given community- based clinics a central role in care delivery. Others have expanded the safety net beyond one primary entity to create joint sharing of responsibility among a much broader group of organizations. For a few, these initiatives are http: / /www.rwjf.org /rwjf- library- temp / community /secl- assessment.htm ¢1 of 4) [117,12000 11:23:53 AM] mmunity initiatives for the Uninsured J 2 creating an environment more conducive for their primary safety -net hospital to seek Medicaid and other revenue in an increasingly competitive market. Initiative development and building relationships with the community. Several provider organizations and governments have used these efforts as important opportunities to build trust with and involve communities in the shaping and monitoring of new initiatives. Such innovations have opened doors to neighborhoods, empowering representatives of vulnerable populations to share both the opportunity and responsibility associated with these programs. An additional benefit has been raising the awareness of the uninsured among providers and community decisionmakers. l The value of political support: Not surprisingly, political support was crucial to creating and t sustaining these programs. In many of these communities there were particular changes in the legal, political, or health system environment that helped facilitated the establishment or growth of the program. In several cases, the creation of these programs. depended on the interventions of key program. In several cases, the creation of these programs depended on the `interventions of _ key officials at the local, state, and federal level. There are several examples (Alameda, Hillsborough, Marion County, Milwaukee, Shelby County), in which local officials served as "policy entrepreneurs," and mobilized support for the new initiative. Virtually all initiatives reflect the importance of a continued presence and commitment of a very few key players. Lessons Learned and Decision Guidelines for Uninsured Initiatives in Communities i The significant achievements listed above capture the positive experiences gained by these initiatives and, as such, may guide communities and government agencies addressing health care 1 for the uninsured. Other common findings raise issues that local decisionmakers will need to resolve as they shape their programs. All programs face challenges of assuring dollars are there to match uninsured populations i needs, lest demand outstrips resources. Attaining this balance can be accomplished by one or a combination of means, including: matching eligibility estimates of numbers of uninsured (e.g., 150% or 200% of poverty) with actuarial estimates of cost and revenues; restricting participation to city and/or county residents; limiting enrollment to sites where qualified uninsured come for F care; and taking measured marketing and outreach actions.' Decisions about program marketing and outreach will likely be significantly affected by the degree of need to control enrollment. Communities need to choose the most effective way to inform potentially eligible individuals about their programs. Too little knowledge of its existence or information about it will lead to a failure to reach targeted populations, while extensive marketing may create financial problems. In'fact, community and organization; representatives commented that limited marketing and focusing only on the ill are most common due to fear of success - -in essence that reaching a larger number of the uninsured will bankrupt the program. One important option is whether initiatives focus on a "sickness" program restricted only to users of the health care system versus measured but active outreach to enroll the uninsured. The issue of access to health care for immigrant residents presents difficult enrollment challenges for several programs. The programs in this study permit undocumented immigrants to receive services,`, but many immigrants refuse 'to enroll in the programs because they do not want to be identified by a government agency. This fear may be exacerbated when the programs screen applicants for eligibility in Medicaid and similar assistance initiatives because immigrants are concerned that they, or their family members, will be categorized as a "public charge." For more than 100 years the U.S. immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) has followed the principle that immigration to the U.S. can be denied if they are found likely to become a "public charge" and rely on government benefits for their. support. Until recently, neither the Congress nor the ''INS had ever defined "public charge." According to the May 26, 1999 rule proposed by the http: //www.rwif.org /rwjf- library- temp /community /secl- assessment.htm (2 of 4) [11/7/2000 11:23:53 AM] community initiatives for the Uninsured 1 1 J 01 INS, the use of health care services, including a Medicaid, CHIP, and city and county programs like CNISP, will not affect the ability of individuals to qualify for a green card (INS, May 26, 1999). Despite this clarification, many immigrants remain uncertain of their legal rights, and communities must develop strategies to address the fear of deportation that discourages people from seeking care. Programs will need to educate previously uninsured on using an organized system of care. Community initiatives will need to address how best to inform uninsured populations .inured to piecemeal care and emergency room use that they are now part of a system of care" with its own privileges and rules. Financial disincentives as well as use of insurance cards, along with enrollee orientation packets can assist in this education process. Political and Financial support are by definition essential for start up, sustainab><hty and further development of these initiatives. Its assurance supports and continues the dynamics and creativity behind these efforts while its lack may bring about a "program fragility i diminishing its reach and jeopardizing current or future viability. € Each community must decide the financial "tools" it has at its disposal to accomplish its objectives. For some, single sources such as existing or new taxes may suffice. Others may choose to redirect existing tax dollars and other state -local support, while some may choose a combination of existing and new public - private resources. For whichever path communities" select, startup and continued political support is critical to this process. Assuring its presence will: " also shape the future direction as well. However, programs will need to recognize that lirni:ted E financial and political. support may limit the scope and reach of their efforts. E Program fragility refers to the frequently precarious nature of funding or other support Programs' "that rely significantly on sources that may be diminishing, such as DSH money, face ever-present financial pressures. Virtually all are subject to the vagaries of politically -based financial support, " which render unpredictable long -term stability. And perpetuation of the financial base ofieu relies ; on a few key individuals. Their departure could decrease support or actually end a program. Absent stability from federal sources, related questions about the future may, in many cases remain unanswerable. Changes in the marketplace, demands for public dollars, "or sigaifiant increases in the uninsured could also destabilize critical financing for these initiatives, unless they are protected by a broad -base of support in the community. Communities have at their disposal the tools of managed care that can be applied with flexibility to accommodate to the desired program goals. Such elements as capitation rates of payment, provider networks, designated provider or medical home, and other means of sttueturing their systems can by be integrated with more traditional mechanisms. Most likely, however, some aspects will be incorporated into the objectives to assist in creating an effective administrative and organizational approach to delivering coordinated care. Communities will need to choose and continually assess the range and depth of services, covered by their initiatives for the uninsured. Cost control through copayments and deductibles as well as limits on certain services may assist if not be required in most circumstances. Pharmaceutical costs, however, will continue to merit close scrutiny and may threaten the care- resource balance if not controlled. Programs must implement some form of quality assurance. Initiatives may choose to use existing or create new measures. HEDIS`and JCAHO provide some guidance in this process and may be enhanced by patient satisfaction or other indicators. Communities must address the relationship between their initiatives for the uninsured and the broader health care safety-net. One additional common question confronting virtually all initiatives, but in particular those that have taken action to close, privatize or otherwise alter the ham:Ih9w. +.*f.org /rwjf- library- tempicommunity /sect - assessment. him (3 of 4) [1 V712000 11:23:53 AM ;ommunity initiatives for the Uninsured 16J vulnerable,populations is the composition of the es, their innovation was tied to the closure or TY wwR� u4Tw+rR,V rwfYV K 4Y,ai1i Y ;V VV414MJ YFKf!, roes Oro ther comrmunities, for reinforcing Iso ed rnadels.' hat is clean is the level of rgrng times, to not accept businm as usual" shed, ar►d in cases life - threatening problem. f tfiese co11aU+�rrative program s; will add 'help and. tes that real w :drat the fate 'of their health care Ittp: / /www.rwjf.org /rwjf- library- temp /community/secl- assessment.htm (4 of 4) [11[7/2Q00 11:23:53 AM] p 1)43 000 ti1M1.EB COMMUNITY NOi ITAL �� 6� location. 350 7th Sireel North. Naples . L da 31102 vj mait P.0 Box 413029, Naples, Florida 34101 r NORTH COLLIER NOSPIT LL (941) 513.7000 11190 Healthpark BNd.. Naples, Fonda 34110 i HP-111 ar+a System A Nor- For+ -VRL n V kw mCARC :7%v :ekr t March 30, 2001 Appendix D The Collier County Commission 3301 Tamiami Trail E. Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Commissioners of Collier County, I am writing to each and every one of you about a crisis that is looming in healthcare across the USA. This crisis involves the unraveling of the safety net of healthcare in this country, and that safety net is the integrity and viability of our emergency departments, numbering over about 5000 across the country. Some of you know me well and some of you do not. Over the next few minutes. I would like to explain to you why we have developed a rapidly growing crisis in healthcare here in Collier County We start with an inadequate number of inpatient hospital beds that becomes overwhelmed during the winter influx of snowbirds and tourists. This also overwhelms the limited supply of nursing home beds to which many hospitalized patients would normally be transferred for extended convalescence. We are under the relentless pressure of unfunded mandates from the state and federal governments; we are operating under marked cutbacks in Medicaid reimbursement rates; our County's uninsured working poor use the ED as both their only doctor and the doctor of last resort. The absence of a broad -based system of affordable primary health care drives these uninsured patients to the emergency departments and creates a "ripple effect" that could, on any given day, easily obstruct your own access to our terribly overcrowded departments when you really need our stand -by readiness and ability to help you or your loved ones during a medical emergency. Understand that this is not theoretical; this is occurring now, and with greater and greater frequency. That is one of many reasons that 1 volunteer every month at the Neighborhood Clinic. I came to Naples after finishing my training in emergency medicine in St. Louis, Missouri. 1 graduated from St. Louis University Medical School ill 1974, completed lny training in emergency medicine in 1978 and moved to Naples in June of that vear l started as an emergency physician in the emergency department of our hospital and, in February of 1979; 7 months after I arrived here. I inaugurated the first advanced life support system (ALS) in our county under the auspices of American Ambulance, the EMS provider at that time. When the Collier County Commission first authorized 1.2 r. - 16J 2 million dollars for me to start this ALS system in 1978, they asked that I uy to demonstrate at least one life saved by the new system during its first year of operation. We launched the system on February 2, 1979 (because we did not have 1 particular license in order on February 1), and, on February 3, 1979, we saved the life of a 55 y/o cardiologist vacationing at the Marco Island Marriot Hotel. The paramedic who defibrillated the cardiologist, Joe Fungiello, is now a stockbroker working for tMerrill Lynch. We went on national television the night of February 3, 1979, Joe Fungiello, the patient and myself, and the Collier County Commission has been supportive of EMS activities ever since. Today, everyone takes our wonderful Collier County Emergency Medical System of Advanced Life Support for granted. But, ALS exists today because the Commissioners in 1978 saw a need; were willing to take a risk, and made a financial commitment. This ALS system has saved countless lives and has the greatest resuscitation rate for acute cardiac arrest in the state of Florida In a similar fashion, 1 hope that this Board of County Commissioners will agree that healthcare for the uninsured is an issue that affects us all— insured or not —and that it will be willing to take a risk and make a financial commitment to this acute and growing problem. THE NETWORK OF CARE IN COLLIER COUNTY I have been the medical director of Collier County EMS since its inception an replacement of American Ambulance in 1981. I have also been the Chairman of the Department of Emergency and Ambulatory Medicine for the NCH Healthcare System since 1986. We currently operate 2 emergency departments seeing a total of 1 10,000 patients per year and 3 urgent care centers seeing an additional 40,000 patients per year In addition, there are about 5 walk -in ambulatory care centers scattered throughout the county; CHSI has a presence primarily in lmmokalee and Everglades City, and The Neighborhood Clinic and Senior Friendship Center are in downtown Naples. The county Health Department provides infectious disease, an AIDS Clinic and prenatal care, in conjunction with a local group of gynecologists. THE WINTER OF 2001 This past winter season has been a major test for us. Emergency Department overcrowding literally met disaster parameters. We often were holding as many as 70 patients awaiting admissions between our two emergency departments. That is 70 very sick patients occupying 70 stretchers in two departments that may have a total of 75 stretchers between them. Patients arriving by means other than ambulance frequently waited 10 hours to see a physician; patients arriving by ambulance oftentimes waited 45 minutes in the ambulance before we could offload them onto a stretcher in our department. Meanwhile, the 6 hospitals in Lee County frequently would all go on diversion at the same time, asking their ambulances to divert south to either North Collier or Naples Community Hospital. 1 had to stop these diversions countless times because we were in far worse shape than any of the hospitals in Lee County. We NEVER HAVE GONE ON DIVERSION AS A HOSPITAL SYSTEM IN COLLIER COUNTY! 16J 2 THE UNRAVELING OF THE HEALTHCARE SAFETY NET The emergency medicine healthcare safety net of the country is in jeopardy of unraveling further and is rooted in many causes, not the least of which is the lack of inpatient hospital beds, sometimes forcing patients to be "boarded" for days in the emergency department until they can be admitted to the hospital When added to the unfunded mandates that the state and federal government have heaped upon all hospitals to see and stabilize, to the best of their ability, all comers to the emergency department. we are left with a crisis of overcrowding and hopelessly red ink. THE UNINSURED Although part of our overcrowding is the result of Naples being a world destination for the northern hemisphere during the wintertime, a major contributor to overcrowding is the fact that the emergency department is the PRIMARY SOURCE OF HEALTHCARE FOR THE UNINSURED. The Neighborhood Clinic, The Senior Friendship Center, The County Health Department and CHS1 also struggle to assist the uninsured, but the "Lion's Share" is absorbed by the emergency departments and the hospital medical staff. Note that many of our uninsured are employed: they simply are not insured. This additional influx of uninsured patients, with essentially nowhere else to go, results in delays that affect everyone. The lifelines of emergency care have grown taut and stretched to the breaking point, and our hospital resources are being pushed beyond the ability to respond. With the relentless growth of our county, Cleveland Clinic will have little impact on this enlarging uninsured population. UNFUNDED MANDATES The key function of a ED is stabilization, the initial reception and early management of patients (both urgent and nonurgent) who present to the department. It is not only a key function, it is federally mandated thru the Emergency Medical Treatment and Labor Act (EMTALA/COBRA) and by the state (Florida Access to Care Legislation). These mandates state that everyone who presents themselves to an emergency department will be stabilized, to the extent possible given the resources of that particular institution, prior to transfer or discharge from the hospital. This stabilization and careful examination is available to anyone, regardless of race, creed, ethnicity or the ability to pay. Failure to do so can result in astronomical fines as well as loss of the hospital's Medicare License. it is curious that these mandates were totally uuaccon► panied by any provisiolls whatsoever to P V for the services mandated! Could any grocery, retail business or restaurant survive if similar mandates were foisted upon them to feed, clothe or serve anyone who walked, stumbled or was thrown tlirougl� their doors, regardless of their ability to pay? r- . 16J 2 NO CONTINUITY OF CARL- Treating the working poor in the Emergency Department is far from ideal, even if we did have the room. We often have no records of what the "last doctor" did for the patient; we have absolutely no continuity of care and, after all is said and done, we treat these patients for nothing (because they have next to nothing with which to pay), and they leave with prescriptions that they can not buy. So, on day one, I evaluate and treat an asthmatic child who requires $150.00 worth of medications + a home nebulizer that costs $50.00. They leave the ED with $200.00 worth of prescriptions and equipment to buy yet their care in our department costs them nothing. 5 days later, with no medications purchased (because there was no money), that child returns to the ED and is admitted in critical condition, consuming over $10,000.00 worth of care over the next 72 hours Now, we have not only added additional overcrowding to our emergency department. we have put another patient in the hospital whose admission could have been avoided if we had an integrated and reasonably funded healthcare delivery system. it is not only an appalling failure of our healthcare delivery network; it is not only a terrible irony in a conununity with so many blessings; it is both a financial and humanitarian outcry that we engineer a reasonable solution to some of these dilemmas. CUTBACKS TN REIMBURSEMENT Additionally, cutbacks in reimbursements to hospitals from Medicare and Medicaid. especially since the Balanced Budget Act, have led to budget cuts such that there is no surplus capacity to handle the ebb and now of emergency admissions. The primary care network; once a promise to ease the overcrowding of the emergency departments, has failed dismally due to capitation from managed care and the realization of many practitioners that these primary care contracts were an invitation to bankruptcy. Hospitals, moreover, have found it difficult to spend money on things that do not make money; they have channeled their resources into profitable (and fife - saving) open heart programs, breast cancer centers and outpatient surgery centers. Most hospitals have not put money into building additional hospital beds because Certificates of Need (COLA's) either would not allow them to or they could not afford to build additional capacity that would only be utilized on a seasonal basis. And pumping additional money into the red - ink business of emergency medicine has limits far below what is needed. NURSING SHORTAGES Our nation and county is suffering from a severe nursing shortage. According to the Florida Hospital Association, there are 57,000 fewer nursing licenses registered in the state of Florida than there were 2 years ago, and we have a much larger population in the state. And, the sometimes unwillingness of on -call specialists to take the enormous case load from the ED, makes the situation overwhelming and threatens the ability of emergency departments such as ours to deliver quality patient care. Also, please keep in mind that this is a national issue; not just an issue relevant to Collier County. N • J 16J 2 POLICE, FIRE, EMS AND EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS Obviously, this cannot go on indefinitely. just as we enjoy the comfort of knowing that police, fire and ambulances are right down the block from most of us, and ready to help us at the drop of a hat, 24/7, we must eventually face up to the fact that emergency services are going to require the assistance of public finding if we are not to suffer further degradation of the quality of services that all of our emergency departments across the country endeavor to provide. As our county has grown, so have the number of serious trauma patients. We must look towards the construction of a trauma center for Collier County and the only way to absorb the costs of providing this greatly enhanced level of care and availability to everyone is thru some degree of public funding. Since have sat on the front lines of emergency care in this county for the past 23 years, I am clearly aware of the fact that we treat a huge number of transient and vacationing patients. The enortnous umbrella of protection that these non - residents enjoy in our county needs taxable support for both this subset of emergency visits as well as the visits of our own residents. 1 can see no other way to equitably and fairly distribute these costs except thru a sales tax that affects everyone who reaches into their wallet while enjoying our beautiful community. Although the massive influx of humanity into the state of Florida will perpetuate every cold and blustery fall from some gray and bleak Midwestern day, there are steps that we can take right now to mitigate the massive wax and wane of patients into and out of cur departments. We can take the right and ethical steps to help fund the uninsured in our community. We can announce to the world that we care about our fellow man: that we will do what we can to hold a disease in check before it marches out of control and demands hospitalization; that we will not disappear quietly into the night and wait for someone else to fix a problem that we have the will, the moral calling and ability to fix today. Thank you for your patience in reading through this call to attention of a most important subject that affects us all. Sincerely, Robert Boyd Tober, M.D., FACEP Medical Director Collier County EMS Chairman, Department of Emergency and Ambulatory Medicine NCH Healthcare System 350 7h St. North Naples, Florida 34102 M ir, ip A Self Insured Plans LLC _ Tar ia:ni Tr3i' `. Telephone 941- 403 -785 4 tiniie 711: Fax 941 -403 -7875 \�ples. Florida 34103 April 12, 2001 Appendix E To: Collier County Board of Commissioners From: Steve Rasnick Subject: Interim Report and Budget Recommendations Introduction I was a member of the initial Collier County Health Care Review Committee, charged with exploring and identifying health care access issues in the County. I am also a member of the Health Care Planning and Finance Committee, charged with the responsibility of identifying, costing and recommending potential solutions. I was chosen for these committees because I am the President of the Southwest Florida Health Underwriters and the owner of Self Insured Plans (SIP), a TPA business domiciled in Naples that currently pays more than $4 million per month to local health care providers on behalf of over 80 local business clients and their 25,000 employee members. I have had more than 35 years of insurance experience, have developed Community Health Plans, and am a frequent national speaker on health benefit issues. I respectfully offer this report in an effort to outline the issues and opportunities, and offer valid pricing statistics drawing from my company's claims experience, my own personal experience and significant interaction with similar programs. Overview There are between 42 -44 million uninsured Americans, up approximately 12 million since the Clinton efforts toward National Health Care in 1992 -93. This group is comprised of individuals that cannot afford health coverage; others that encounter access problems, and others that intentionally gamble that the cost savings associated with not purchasing health insurance coverage will ultimately outweigh the risks associated with having no coverage. All three categories are represented in Collier County, and it is our conservative estimate that at least 30,000 Collier County residents, under age 65, are amongst the uninsured, with about 16,000 — 20,000 of them earning less than 200% of Federal Poverty Guidelines (FPG). The Collier County working uninsured generally work for employers that do not offer health insurance or offer coverage at a price that is unaffordable for employees, based upon their low hourly wage. Amongst this group, cost is the number one obstacle to obtaining health insurance coverage. One might ask why so many Collier County employers do not offer health insurance, and why F' the cost is so high for those employers that offer insurance, especially during a period of unparalleled prosperity within the county and nationally? The answer is complex and not appropriate for this forum. Nevertheless, a basic understanding of the insurance marketplace in Florida and in Collier d the County ll intendedt bu to undersand the failuret quick �ynarrucs of the uninsured problem and to avo The cost of health insurance is driven by each insurer's need and ability to generate reasonable profits as well as competition among various carriers. However, most health insurers consider Florida as an "unfriendly" state, characterized by an Insurance Department bureaucracy that seemingly has lost sight of the required balance between consumer protection and the necessity for insurers to generate shareholder value. Additionally, excessive state - mandated benefits, when combined with federal mandates, add almost $35 to each premium dollar collected, artificially forcing the cost of coverage out of reach for many employees/employers. These issues have driven many insurers out of the state, and in Collier County today, we have only three primary carrier sources for insured health programs, out of more than 1800 health insurers nationally. This lack of competition, when combined with a general lack of managed care within Collier County, have forced the average monthly cost of Employee coverage to almost $289.00 PEPM and the cost of family coverage in excess of $875.00 per family unit per month, based upon traditional plan designs. These costs are increasing at a rate of 15% per year, and according to the 2000 Mercer/Foster Higgins Study, the average annual composite health insurance cost in Collier County is approximately $3900.00 per person per year. This number is relevant for two reasons. First, it clearly demonstrates that the hourly wage scales for Collier County will never grow adequately to solve the uninsured problem using a private sector insurance solution. Secondly, the number is relevant when carving out the preventive component, which is equal to about 10% of the annual cost, on a gross basis. The Realities Of Cost In The Current Collier County. Environment Due to a phenomenon called "cost shifting ", the current users of the medical delivery system in Collier County are paying for the cost of providing services to the uninsured. In 1999, NCH provided almost $21 million of uncompensated care to the indigent, and it can be estimated that providers have also donated uncompensated services of a similar magnitude. As a result, portions of their uncompensated costs are reflected in higher costs for the services provided to the insured patients, resulting in higher fees for medical services and higher insurance premiums. It can be assumed that these costs have increased by at least the cost of medical inflation over the past two years, 10 -15% per year. While available statistics regarding the cost of various components of care in Collier County are inadequate, our analysis of other Florida and regional operational models with similar demographics to Collier County, as well as the available statistics from the 25,000 members covered by SIP provide ample empirical evidence of both the problem and the solution opportunities. The following information is instructional: 16J � • Treatment provided to the uninsured is episodic in nature, usually dealing with the treatment of acute symptoms of characteristically non -acute conditions (e.g. colds, flu symptoms, pediatric care, high blood pressure, diabetes and complications, minor lacerations, etc.). • The most common treatment setting for the uninsured is the hospital emergency room. • According to SIP claims statistics, the average cost of non -acute emergency room treatment is approximately $600 per visit. • In season, 6 -10 hour emergency room waiting times are common. Greatly reduced wait time could be achieved if the uninsured were treated in the most appropriate setting, usually not the ER. • Defensive medicine and prudent treatment protocols have lead to increasing hospital admissions through the emergency room. • In season, hospital beds are routinely unavailable, often caused by the need to treat the uninsured for conditions that could have been avoided if they had been provided access to primary health care services on a consistent basis. • The average length of a non - surgical, non - maternity hospital stay in Collier County, based upon SIP statistics, is approximately 270 days per 1000 admissions, at a cost of approximately $7000.00 per day. Many of these hospitalizations for the uninsured patients could have been avoided had adequate primary care been provided. • Due to the acute nature of the hospital care provided to the uninsured in today's environment, it is reasonable to estimate that both the frequency of inpatient admissions as well as their average length of stay will be as much as 150% of that for the insured population. This has also been verified during the Committee's review of other successful models, which have generated savings in the per - patient cost of health care for the uninsured of as much as 45 %. • Although there are literally hundreds of different office visit CPT billing codes for different age groups as well as different levels of severity, the following codes are reflective of the suggested cost basis for normal office treatment at 80% of the 2001 Medicare reimbursement rates. The key point to derive from this illustration is the enormous savings available if we change the treatment setting for the uninsured from a hospital setting to a prunary care physician's office with a focus on prevention. The 80" percentile is illustrated, as this was the most common fee - for - service reimbursement level of the models studied by the Committee. 16J 2 CPT Codes Procedure 80% of Medicare 99202 Office Visit -New Patient- Moderate $51.20 99203 Office Visit- New Patient- Severe $75.67 99213 Office Visit- Established Patient- Moderate $41.50 99215 Office Visit- Established Patient - Severe $96.04 Cost Implications Of The Proposed Plan As part of its evaluation process, the Health Care Planning and Finance Committee examined, among others, the following operational models: • Hillsborough County, Florida • Leon County, Florida • Palm Beach County, Florida • Marion County, Florida • Buncombe County, NC In addition, the Committee reviewed the profiles of 18 other in documents published by the New York Academy Of Medicine, a portion of which has been attached to the Committee report as Appendix C. Based on the experiences of the other models that were studied, it is my recommendation that a program grounded in primary care be funded in Collier County as the initial step in mitigating the uninsured medical problem in Collier County. The cost per member, given the experiences of similar programs, would be relatively nominal and the benefits to the community as a whole would be considerable. Specifically: • A coordinated system of primary, preventative care would be contracted out with existing health care providers, either on a discounted fee - for - service basis, a capitated basis, or a combination of both • The cost per member per year, utilizing a blend of the aforementioned procedure codes, would be approximately $225.00 per member, based upon an average of 2.7 visits per year. • An administrative load of about 15% would yield a total per member, per year rate of about $250.00. • Eligibility would be tied to Federal Poverty Guidelines (FPG) and include those uninsured earning 200% or less of the FPG. 16J 2 As much as a 40 -45% reduction in current per- patient treatment expenses can reasonably be anticipated through this program, primarily by reducing ER and in- patient hospital expenses. • Savings through the reduction of uncompensated episodic care could eventually be translated into reduced provider expenses or expanded services. Reduced claims costs could eventually result in the reduction or stabilization of health insurance costs in Collier County, increasing access to coverage. These cost projections are reasonable when compared to similar programs and have been validated against SIP'S claims database. Nevertheless, if either actual costs or frequency increase at a rate higher than projected, the number of members covered under the program would be reduced to guarantee that the total cost of the program would not exceed the available funding. Conclusion While the numbers make a compelling argument for the implementation of this program, in the final analysis it's simply the right thing to do, and more importantly, it is simply "good business" for Collier County. Collier County needs to take control of its uninsured issue now and make available a safety net for those lower wage hourly employees that we must attract in order for Collier County businesses to expand to meet the demands of our rapidly growing population. naplesnews.com I Printed story Appendix F 7o print this page. select File then Print from your browser. r-g;_,_ ham' wuu napiesnews com'O1'O+-naplcs'd571293a.htm Naples 1X*r5lilaitit'O115 S & + D Navies front I Naples archive j help 16J 2 Public asked for comment on indigent health care in Collier County Monday, March 19, 2001 By LIZ FREEMAN, eufreeman6 naV1esnews.com Anyone who has faced hardships getting medical treatment because of a lack of insurance or income constraints, now's the chance to speak up. A citizens committee formed by the Collier County Commission in 1999 to examine the complex problem of indigent care in the community is holding a public forum Wednesday to hear residents' views on the subject. The forum will be 7 -8:30 p.m. at the Golden Gate Community Center, 4701 Golden Gate Parkway. Members of the Collier County Health Care Planning and Finance Committee will present findings from a year -long evaluation of gaps in local medical services that make it difficult for the uninsured and low - income to get regular medical care. The committee found 30,000 residents under 65, or about 18 percent of the county's population, have no health insurance and face barriers getting treatment. An offshoot of the original committee is exploring options for developing solutions to the problem. The group will present recommendations to county commissioners on how to finance a system of care so needy residents can have regular access to medical services. Some sort of countywide tax will likely be among recommendations. That group, a finance committee, has not developed any of its recommendations, but should be far enough along in their work to make a 90- minute interim presentation to commissioners April 24, said James Tindall, a spokesman for the committee. Wednesday's public forum is designed so anyone in the community can hear what the committee's findings are about indigent care and to hear firsthand from physicians and others in the health -care industry about their experiences working with the uninsured. "The public really hasn't had a chance to hear much of the findings," Tindall said. "And we think it will be helpful, as well as provocative, to hear the views of people in the front line of health care." There will be a 35- minute presentation from professionals such as Dr. Robert Tober, chairman of the Department of Emergency Medicine for the NCH Healthcare System, and Dr. Joan Colfer, director of the Collier County Health Department. Also scheduled to speak is Steve Rasnick, president of a local company that processes medical claims for health -care systems and insurance companies. 3/19/01 htt p -. Hcfapps. naplesnews. com/sendlink/printthis. cfrn napiesnews.com 1 rrnntea story 1 "5� - �• 16J 2 "He will make a point we are all paying for (indigent care)," Tindall said, referring to how the cost of caring for the poor and uninsured is passed onto the insured through higher premiums. "You have obvious cost - shifting now. You just don't see it on your tax bill." The finance group is waiting for a report from members of the original planning and review committee on how other communities have developed systems to care for their indigent residents and how those systems are financed, Tindall said. The group is looking at two communities in particular, Hillsborough County and West Palm Beach. The forum will be moderated by Janet Kennedy, host of a local television program on health -care issues, and will be taped for later broadcast on the county's Channel 54, Tindall said. The committee's findings about the status of indigent care were culled from local health -care resources and from state agencies. With 30,000 uninsured residents, or 18 percent of the county population, that is above the state average uninsured rate of 16.8 percent, the group found. About 6,500 of Collier's uninsured live in Immokalee. The majority of the uninsured are between 19 and 64, are working and "trying to make it," the report said. The working -poor population is clustered in East Naples, Golden Gate and Immokalee. About 27 percent of the uninsured are children. White these individuals have some access to medical attention — the predominant sources are a handful of private nonprofit organizations and the costly emergency rooms at the hospitals — they lack primary care, specialty care, dental care, mental health care and vision care, according to the report. & Format this story for printina. j jjSearch our archive for related stories: i ........................... ............................... advanced search Navigation: Go to today's Naples section front Go to our 7 -day Naples archive FE Also in today's Naples section: u • • / zrtrlTiT.T/Tifl19,MwiiTli�Tit7ar- •• IL7I- Am(ril[I[- 31[•t -WILI uur Bonita man. Naples teen take karaoke title market - I continue Broadway stars headline fund-raiser in Naples to MIR breast canctLr&UArSb Cleveland Clinic workina on insurance contracts for Napl*s hospital Collier to l• as opponents ., legal option l David Edison trial scheduled to beoin l Collier cou l Defense attomeys to seek D'Ale sandro's office removal from Noffi-i- 1 building class Goss. Graham get up-close Io k at war on druas In Colombia Leoislature II summit. -•I •I reform kick off week of budOet Alks [: p �� Sudoet battle looms in Tallahassee Marco, state -1 withdrawal from t• r drownninniams Orchestra DwEbhgtol http://cfapps.napiesnews.com/sendlink/printthis-cfin napiesnews.com Printed story ., Appendix F 16J 2 To print this page. select File then Print from your browser. LTL: h!!p %n papl .snews c,'O U0;inaples d414999a.htm StL of) Naoles front I Naples archive I heio Town hall meeting addresses problems in county's health -care system Thursday, March 22, 2001 By LIZ FREEMAN, 0freem"naR1esneWL0Z Carolyn Alden, an attorney who moved to Collier County six months ago, wants to know why there are no Medicare HMOs in the county, and why she's facing a hard time getting treatment for depression even though she's got disability insurance. Mary Martin, who's lived here four years and is the caregiver for her parents, wants to know why there's such a turnover of certified nurses aides and other workers in nursing homes and elsewhere in medical care. Dorothy Dove, an Immokalee retiree on a fixed income, said she relies on the Collier County Health Department in Immokalee to help get her heart medications. Alden, Martin and Dove were among dozens of people who attended a town hall meeting Wednesday night at the Golden Gate Community Center to learn more about the problems and shortfalls in the community's health -care system which makes it difficult for the indigent and low- income working people to get regular medical attention. If the health department didn't exist in Immokalee, Dove said, "I would tell you, I don't know what I would do." The forum, attended by about 80 people, many of whom are in the local health -care industry, was put on by the Collier County Health Care Planning and Finance Committee. The purpose was for committee members to present firsthand to the public some of the findings of their evaluation of what "gaps" exist in the local health -care system for the needy. The group's 70 -page report was sent to civic groups and elected leaders when it was released last fall, but no public forums for citizen questions were held. The committee was formed by the Collier County Commission in 1999 to examine the complex problem of indigent health care and to explore options for closing loopholes in the local health -care system. A second committee is now looking at how to finance a system of primary care for the needy. Committee chairman Tom Schneider highlighted aspects of the group's-report, notably that 30,000 Collier residents under 65 have no health insurance. That's roughly 18 percent of the county's total population. Another finding is that 65 percent of those uninsured are employed but work for http: //cfapps.naplesnews.com/sendfink/printthis-cfm 3!22!01 VV J.b Vlll 1 rlaucu Dw1.Y r arc 't vi 16J 2 Medical care for low- income pregnant women in Collier has gone full circle in recent years. The foundation was established in 1999 when CHSI closed its prenatal care clinic that had been operating in the East Naples health department building for several years. CHSI cited financial hardship as the reason for pulling out. Local obstetricians, health department officials, and NCH administrators united and formed the foundation, knowing the consequences are worse when high -risk pregnant women are not properly cared for, they are more likely to have problem deliveries and babies born with developmental setbacks. For the foundation's program, the health department provides the clinic space, NCH provides clinical support staff, including nurses, and the obstetricians provide their services. Now in its second year of operation, the foundation has handled more than 9,000 prenatal visits annually from clients and the obstetricians will deliver more than 900 babies this year. The obstetricians rotate working in the clinic on Monday, Wednesday and Friday, while the clinic is open five days a week for pregnancy tests, interviews for Medicaid eligibility and getting patients oriented to the clinic. Hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The doctors see the patients their three days from 1 to 4 p.m. Marie St. Louis, 21, who came to Collier from Haiti when she was 13, is six months pregnant with her third child. Her two other children, one is 4 and the other is 1, were delivered through the aid of the foundation clinic or when CHSI had run the program. "I like the way they treat me," St. Louis said. "They help me. I wouldn't be able to pay for seeing doctors. I wouldn't be able to do that." The clinic staff got St. Louis enrolled in Medicaid. Her husband is a manager of a McDonald's fast food restaurant. St. Louis especially likes Buser "He's a funny guy," she said. Last Wednesday, Buser steadily saw patients throughout the afternoon, often communicating with them through an interpreter. He has good news for Julia Garcia, originally from Mexico. Blood tests show all is fine for the young woman who is four months pregnant. Buser explains to her there is an optional test to determine if her baby has Down's syndrome, and that she will have an ultrasound in three weeks. "It sounds good," he said, listening to her baby's heartbeat. She comprehends what he said through his smile. She smiles back. (The telephone for the Foundation for Women's Health in Naples is 732 -2580. The telephone number in Immokalee is 648- 3021.) http: // cfapps. naplesnews .com /sendlink/printthis.cfm 3/26/01 4 SENATOR BURT L. SAUNDERS 25th District THE FLORIDA SENATE Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -1100 The Honorable James Carter, Chairman Collier County Board of Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Administration Building, 3`d Floor Naples, FL 34112 4 April 2001 Dear Chairman Carter and Commissioners: ,A&4 r p 1 COMMITTEES: 16J 2 Health, Aging and Long -Term Care, Chairman Appropriations - Subcommittee on Health and Human Services Children and Families Commerce and Economic Opportunities Reapportionment - Subcommittee on Legislative Apportionment and Redistricting Rules and Calendar This letter is to inform you of my support of the Collier County Health Care Planning and Finance Committee's efforts to provide recommendations to the Commission. This is a very valuable resource for the board in making many of the difficult decisions on the expenditure of our tax revenues. As you are well aware, there has been an effort over the last several years at the Federal level to delegate authority to the states to solve state problems. This same trend is evident at the state level with more responsibility being shifted to cities and counties. Providing indigent health care services will undoubtedly become more the responsibility of counties. With rapidly increasing Medicaid costs at the state level, local governments are going to be called upon to solve many of their local health care problems. The county's health care planning committee has completed its interim report. The committee has worked diligently to recommend alternative sources of funding to address the needs of our community. I applaud the Commission for initiating this study and considering various alternatives available to fund those services. I am pleased the Commission has assumed a proactive approach on this issue since the Governor has made clear his position that such services are the responsibility of local government. If I can be of further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, 1. . Burt L. Saunders State Senator, District 25 REPLY T0: O 1039 SE 9th Place, Suite 120, Cape Coral, Florida 33990-3095 (941) 338 -2777 O 3301 East Tamiami Trail. Adnunistration Building, Suite 304, Naples. Flonda 34112 (941) 417 -6220 D 322 Senate Office Building, 404 South Monroe Street, Tallahassee, Florida 32399 -1100 (850) 487 -5124 Legislature's Website: hltp: /tivww.leg. state. Aus JOHN MCKAY GINNY BROWN -WAITE FAYE W. BLANTON DONALD SEVERANCE President President Pro Tempore Secretary Sergeant at Arms APPENDIX I DAvID P. ROGOFF HEALTH CARE CONSULTING 336 South Riverhills Drive Tampa, FL 33617 Phone: 813 - 9848529 e-mail: jrogoff426 @aol.com TO: Thomas Schneider Chair, Health Care Review Committee FROM: David Rogoff 16,1 Fax: 813- 989 -0653 SUBJECT: Report: Strategies for Providing Health Care to the Uninsured of Collier County DATE: April 9, 2001 It is my pleasure to summarize my observations and recommendations for how Collier County can proceed in addressing the health care needs of its uninsured and underinsured. While these observations allow the setting of funding and implementation strategy, clearly the next step should be the specific identification of how to start these programs, detailed operational budgeting and financial feasibility, and implementation. It has been a pleasure working with the dedicated group of people who constitute your Health Care Review Committee. The existence of catalysts for change is a necessary condition for any successful solution and your group certainly serves that purpose. Attachment 16,1 z April 9, 2001 Strategies for Providing Health Care to the Uninsured of Collier County I. Background: In February 2001, the Health Care Review Committee of Collier County began to utilize the assistance of Dave Rogoff, a consultant working with the U.S. Government's Bureau of Primary Health Care, to assist in identifying directions for the provision of health care to the uninsured and underinsured of Collier County. Mr. Rogoffs initial visit on February 12 -13, 2001focused on working with the Health Care Review Committee and its Models Subcommittee in identifying the vision, describing the current situation, and an initial discussion of strategies to accomplish the vision. Existing documents, interviews, and data collection were utilized as input to a meeting with the Models Subcommittee. The result of this visit was documented. A subsequent March 21, 2001, meeting with the Health Care Review Committee was held to define further the overall strategy for addressing the health care needs of Collier County's uninsured and underinsured. Mr. Rogoffs professional services were funded by the Bureau of Primary Health Care and Florida's Department of Health with the Collier County Health Department assisting in a portion of his travel expenses. His background is attached at the end of this document. 11. Observations and Recommendations: A. Recommended Solution: The health care needs of the uninsured and underinsured of Collier County are best addressed by giving them access to an integrated primary care, community -based system of health care and prevention. The major components of this type of health system (which is further illustrated in Exhibit 1) are: ❖ Comprehensive Primary Care and Prevention (including core services, outreach and education, and case- management and referral.) ❖ Referral services including hospital, specialty, and others. While this integrated system should be the overall objective, it could be accomplished through multiple yet coordinated, phased -in programs, each implemented as funding becomes available. B The Target Populations: As further illustrated in Exhibit 2, Florida children under 20 years old who live below 200% of the Federal Poverty Guideline and most adults over 65 years old at all 16J 2 income levels have access to govemment- funded health care programs. Within the 20 to 65 years old group, there are only isolated sub - groups that have access to govemment subsidized programs such as low- income pregnant women who have access to Medicaid. Therefore, the uninsured and underinsured between 20 and 65 years old have the greatest difficulty in gaining access to health care and should be the target for Collier County subsidized health care. However, Collier County activities should also assist eligible residents in taking advantage of existing state and federally funded health care programs. C. Initial Phase: Strengthening the availability of comprehensive primary care and prevention is a necessary first step in developing an integrated community primary care -based system of health care and prevention for the uninsured and underinsured of Collier County. This first phase of development includes the following considerations: Taking Advantage of Existing _Assets: As long as Collier County continues to pay its annual local match of $372,000, children below 19 years old, up to 200% of Federal Poverty Guidelines, have access to state and federally subsidized health care under the KidsCare program (see Exhibit 2.) Therefore, Collier County should mount efforts to guarantee that all who are eligible for KidsCare take advantage of it. The incremental cost to the County is only the cost of outreach. • Similarly, Collier County should be sure to take maximum advantage of other available sources of dollars for the uninsured such as Medicaid. In addition, the Florida legislature is currently discussing resurrecting a pool of money to subsidize the uninsured, funded by a user tax on those who are insured. The Florida Department of Insurance would administer payments from this fund. • Collier County's solutions should take advantage of existing assets. This includes supporting existing providers and keeping subsidized programs for primary care, such as the school nurse program, viable. Also, contracts with existing primary care providers, centrally managed and coordinated, are preferable to starting new programs. Strengthening the Provision of Primary Care: • Collier County should focus its initial financial investment on improving access to primary care. There are numerous experiences across the U.S. that show that access to primary care drives costs down by avoiding use of emergency departments at hospitals either as an inappropriate substitute for less expensive primary care or because the patient finally went for treatment only when the condition worsened. These experiences have been true for comprehensive programs such as in Hillsborough FL, Boston MA, and Marion IN Counties as well as programs that focus on primary care such as in Leon County FL, and Palm Beach County FL (Level 2). 16J 2 April 9, 2001 Page 3 Some programs have used a form of a sliding scale based on income. For example, the sliding scale could apply for those over a specifically designated Federal Poverty Guideline. • An annual investment of $21VI to $2.5M could cover the primary care (including basic pharmaceutical coverage) for 6,500 to 8,500 Collier County residents aged 20 to 64 below 200% of Federal Poverty Guideline who are currently uninsured. This is between 33% and 43% of the County's uninsured between 20 and 64 and below 200% of FPG. (See Exhibits 3 and 4 for calculation.) Initially, specialty care and inpatient care would continue to be pro-bono. However, a program to administer referral services and coordinate their provision with the primary care program should be developed. This includes the recognition that specialty care that is managed is more efficient than specialty care assigned through emergency departments. Examples of programs that administer and coordinate volunteer specialty services include the Florida We Care program (through principles developed by the Florida Medical Association and implemented in several Florida counties) and the Project Access Program (developed in Buncombe County [Asheville], North Carolina and replicated in numerous locations.) D. Future Activities: Our objective should be to obtain incremental funding that will result in coverage of all the uninsured under 200% Federal Poverty Guideline within two to three years. • For Collier County to fund fully a comprehensive health care program, the expenditure would exceed $30 million (as further illustrated in Exhibits 3 and 4.) Over time, as County funding increases, subsidy of additional specialty and referral health care services should be added. An example of a fully government funded program is the Hillsborough (FL) County Health Care Plan. In order for the County to partner with the private sector to fund additional comprehensive health care services, consideration should be given to implementing programs that share the health care coverage cost of the working poor among the employer, the government, and the employee. Examples of such a program are HealthChoice Programs in Wayne County MI and in Muskegon County MI. These two Michigan health care cost sharing programs are only available to businesses with greater than 80% of its employees earning less than $10 per hour. The premium is equally split among the employer, the government, and the employee. While the concept of sharing makes sense, the level of sharing may differ and the employee's contribution could be in the form of co-pays (fees at the time of service). In addition, subsidy could vary by income level. Attachments Exhibit 1. INTEGRATED PRIMARY CARE COMMUNITY -BASED HEALTH SYSTEM Community I I Mental Substance social services health Abuse Based on the Integrated Primary Care Community Based Health System Model (April 2000) recommended by the Bureau of Primary Health (BPHC) and the Health Research and Services Administration (HRSA). COMPREHENSIVE PRIMARY CARE AND PREVENTION Hospital Services Cone Services • preventive Translation - primary care Case- Managed, Outreach specialty • dental Integrative Care Enrollment . lab & : -ray Referral Transportation • pharmacy System Health Education . primary mental health Camplementary and Alternative 11erapies Community I I Mental Substance social services health Abuse Based on the Integrated Primary Care Community Based Health System Model (April 2000) recommended by the Bureau of Primary Health (BPHC) and the Health Research and Services Administration (HRSA). I f .. 161 Exhibit 2. STATE AND FEDERALLY SUBSIDIZED HEALTH INSURANCE PROGRAMS BY AGE AND INCOME (% OF FEDERAL POVERTY GUIDELINE [FPG] ) (State of Florida) 200%' 150% % OF FPG 100% 0% A�NNNNNNME 0 YRS. grYM CMwb SiRWSo�s} _._► 19 65 AGE :'. :: { : • 'LQUE'LS :. . ' t' Mimi AND HEALTHY KOS (CND i .MEDWARS' C �h�ll�lCesUHEhns. 1 +NN 4' =- OTHER PROGRAMS P R .. ). ..'.'.'.' ... ..,. FOR CENTANI SRUATM& ': �► yy....--...'...' :row ......:. (insY nin0sy ............. :�. 0% A�NNNNNNME 0 YRS. grYM CMwb SiRWSo�s} _._► 19 65 AGE 16J 2 Exhibit 3. COLLIER COUNTY UNINSURED BELOW 200% OF FEDERAL POVERTY NOT=; (a) The 1998 Cdlier percentage of trial population at poverty *AM is ublized to esb emis 2000 stabatic. SOURCE: Claritas Esbrrraams for Florida Departrnwild of Health (b) The 1998 uninsured rats by incortr level for District 14 (in which Collier is located) is utilized for 1998 and 2000 County set, SOURCE: Department of Health, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Data Analysis. (c) SOURCE: Department d Healh, Office d Planning, Evaluation and Data Analysis. (d) It is aatirnated that 80% of uninsured are between 19 and 84 years old (20% are below 19 and over 85 is covered by Medicare.) '.•.. A710N'.. ')4XtlLRTR1K. .'popAlATpYM. .'.VNNIIVR/�II7s'. '. m. '.'. ..LE... . . .Y. . . . ..... • :+M41 :x:oF1'4i'1+4�4Tp4► .'. ,QC11 :: ' (1NNa�tttlr►:: : ::iaoari00%cr:::::: wMCOnstavell 11MtS01l1fa� .pit ltlitpOlf®tiY :RUMIMM!(pro) . .liflif8: • .TMAl•: ati lost +. soh e17�elrtq (4 ) 1808 coulee cou" C 100% F" 20,809 10.4%(a) 41.0% (b) 8,450 ( b) moasreoa 100% and 200% Fm 31.194 15.7% (a) 35.5% (b) 11.074 ( b) 200% Fm 51.803 28 2% (a) 19.524 Total Pops lMisa 198,093 100.0% 180% 1" 26,153 10.4% (a) 41.0% (b) 10,723 8,578 barreee 160% and 200% Fp0 39.585 15.7% (a) 35.5% (b) 14.053 11 242 2M% FM 85 737 26_2% (a) 24 775 19820 Toeal plop wioa (a) 251,377 NOT=; (a) The 1998 Cdlier percentage of trial population at poverty *AM is ublized to esb emis 2000 stabatic. SOURCE: Claritas Esbrrraams for Florida Departrnwild of Health (b) The 1998 uninsured rats by incortr level for District 14 (in which Collier is located) is utilized for 1998 and 2000 County set, SOURCE: Department of Health, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Data Analysis. (c) SOURCE: Department d Healh, Office d Planning, Evaluation and Data Analysis. (d) It is aatirnated that 80% of uninsured are between 19 and 84 years old (20% are below 19 and over 85 is covered by Medicare.) 16J Exhibit 4. PROJECTED BUDGET AS A FUNCTION OF PER MEMBER PER YEAR EXPENSES FOR PRIMARY AND COMPREHENSIVE SERVICES People Covered % of Collier Uninsumd at f PG (W Est. Pop) (a) Annual Budget as Function of Per Parson Per Year (PMPY), Expenses: I I Primary Comprehensive Services (c) Can ( b) 1 <100% <200% LO H1 ( 3,5781( 19,820) $900 33,000 $3,500 $4,000 94,500 PMPY PMPY PMPY PMPY PMPY 6500 76% 33% $1.95 M $19.50 M $22.75 M $26.00 M $29.25 7000 32% 35% $2.10 M $21.00 M $24.50 M $28.00 M $31.50 M 3000 93% 40% $2.40 M $24.00 M $28.00 M $32.00 M $36.00 M 8500 99% 43% $2.55 M $25.50 M $29.75 M $34.00 M $38.25 M 9000 100% mil' % $2.70 M $27.00 M $31.50 M $36.00 M $40.50 M 10000 100% 50% $3.00 M $30.00 M $35.00 M $40.00 M $45.00 M NOTES: (a) From estimate of Collier uninsured at specific federal poverty guidelines. (b) Sources of cost ranges are based upon discounted fee for service calculations and the experience at other subsidized programs (such as Leon, Hillsborough, and Palen R,aA Counties, FL), self- standing free clinic models (such as Detroit) and other sources of insurance information. This per person per year number includes budgeting for payments and the administration of the program. Detailed worksheets are available. (c) Sources of cost ranges are experience at other subsidized programs (such as Leon and Hillsborough Counties FL), The wide range is a the result of numerous models for patient management and benefits packages. 16J ;-) DAVID P. ROGOFF HEALTH CARE CONSULTING 336 South Riverhills Drive Tampa, FL 33617 Phone: 813 -984 -8529 e-mail: jrogoff426 @aol.com Fax: 813- 989 -0653 BIOGRAPHICAL PRESENTATION -- DAVE ROGOFF Dave Rogoff is President of David P. Rogoff Health Care Consulting. His planning and marketing consulting practice helps organizations plan, develop, and implement programs to improve the health status of their communities. He specializes in helping organizations address the needs of low- income populations. Dave has over 25 years experience in health care management and consulting. He possesses a unique mix of experience in planning, marketing, and implementing innovative health care and community programs, services and facilities, as well as having been a high level executive in not - for -profd hospitals and health systems. Dave is a technical advisor to the federal govemment's Bureau of Primary Health Care (BPHC) called "100% Access, Zero Discrepancies" Campaign, a funded initiative to improve health care access. In this capacity, Dave has worked with numerous communities to help develop plans for health care access for their underserved populations. He has also assisted BHPC in business planning and developing planning methodologies. Some of Dave's other recent projects include: Planning and implementing primary health care services in Detroit's inner city. - Strategic planning for a children's hospital in Ohio. - Assisting in children's health care policy in Hillsborough County. Operational planning for a large hospital emergency room and its physician group. Provision of other strategic advice to health care and social services clients. Prior to starting his own consulting business, Dave was Vice President of Planning, Marketing, Public Relations, and Community Care at St. Joseph's - St. Anthony's Health System in Tampa. While at St. Joseph's, he planned, created, and administered St-Joseph's Community Care Network to provide services to the indigent population under the auspices of the award- winning Hillsborough County (Tampa, FL, area) Health Plan. He also worked with the Hillsborough County government to develop the overall Health Plan and still is a member of the Management Committee of the Health Plan. Dave believes in community services. He is a member of the Kiwanis Club of Tampa and his other current community service includes: - Chair, Hillsborough County Immunization Task Force. - Chair, Kiwanis Children Priority One Committee and the Be Wise Immunize Program. - Member, Catholic Health East Global Outreach Advisory Committee. - Member, Management Committee of the commissioner appointed Hillsborough County Health Care Advisory Board. Dave is a part-time faculty member of the University of Tampa's School of Business and has taught at other universities and has presented at numerous local, regional, and national conferences. Mr. Rogoff is a graduate of the University of Michigan with a Bachelor's of Science in Industrial Engineering and a Master's of Hospital Administration. �6 ✓gip COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE SUITE 605 NAPLES, FL 34108 (941) 597 -1749 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING FAX: (941) 597 -4502 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PELICAN BAY MSTBU ADVISORY COMMITTEE AT THE FOUNDATION CENTER, 8962 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108 ON FEBRUARY 6, 2002 at 3:00 P.M. AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2. Approval of the Minutes of the January 2, 2002 Regular Meeting 3. Acceptance of Grant from WCI for U.S. 41 Median Landscaping — Mr. Dwight Thomas 4. Sub - committee Reports - Organization Structure Review Sub - committee - PBSD Revised Ordinance Enactment - Clam Bay Sub - Committee - Clam Bay Annual Monitoring & Improvement Schedule - Cattail Removal - Clam Pass Dredging 5. Administrator's Report - Community Issues - U.S. 41 Median Landscaping - Sidewalk Overlays and Repairs - North Pelican Bay Boulevard Traffic Signal - U.S. 41 Street Lighting (Gulf Park Drive to Seagate Drive) - U.S. 41 Berm Landscaping 6. Consideration of Request by the Pelican Bay Property Owners for a Moratorium on Construction of Irrigation and Landscaping to the U.S. 41 berm 7. Election of Chairman and Vice Chairman 8. Financial Statement Review 9. Audience Participation 10. Adjourn ADDITIONALLY, THIS NOTICE ADVISES THAT, IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ANY PERSON REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS AT THIS MEETING BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY OR PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT SHOULD CONTACT THE DIVISION OFFICE AT (941) 597 -1749 AT LEAST FIVE CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. 4 1 14J 1 �s To: 16J 2 MINUTES OF THE PELICAN BAY For Ma MEETING OF JANUARY 2, 2002 Naples, LET IT BE KNOWN, that the Pelican Bay NM ai B e FoundationoCent 8e8269'Hammuock Session on this date, January 2, 2002 at 3:00 Oak Drive, Naples, Florida 34108 with the following members present: Mr. Lou Vlasho Mr. Joseph Bawduniak Mr. Thomas Brown Mr. James Burke Mr. James Carroll Mr John Domenie Mr. Glen Harrell (Absent) Mrs. Cornelia Kriegh Mr. David Roellig Mr. Christopher Sutphin Mr. George Werner ALSO PRESENT: Approximately ten (10) Pelican Bay residents; Dr. James D. Carter, Ph.D. Mr. Ed Kant, Director, Collier County Chairman, Collier County Board of County Commis Department Director, Pelican Bay Services Transportation Operations; Mr. James P. Ward, Division; Mr. Kyle Lukasz, Field Manager, Pelican Bay Services Division and Mrs. Barbara Smith, Recording Secretary. AGENDA 1. Roll Call 2, Approval of the Minutes of the December 50 2001 Regular Meeting 3. Sub - committee Reports Organization D Revised ordinance Enactment ittee - Clam Bay Sub - Committee - Clam Bay Annual Monitoring & Improvement Schedule - Cattail Removal - Clam Pass Dredging 4_ Administrator's Report Capital Projects Pelican Bay Boulevard (South Entrance) to Gulf Park Drive Irrigation Landscape Improvements Community Issues U.S. 41 Landscaping Sidewalk Overlays and Repairs North Pelican Bay Boulevard Traffic Signal - U.S. 41 Street Lighting (Gulf Park Drive to Seagate Drive) Financial Statement Review 5. Committee Requests Vanderbilt Beach Parking Garage —Glen Harrell 6. Audience Participation 7. Adjourn ROLL ALL order and asked that the record show Mr. Glen Harrell Mr. Vlasho called the meeting to with an excused absence. —word "easy' should be changed to "west'. Page 4673 —Third Paragraph, fifth line 4708 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J 2 January 2, 2002 _ Mr. Werner moved, seconded by Mr. Bawduniak and approved unanimously the Minutes of the December 5, 2001 Meeting, s ub ect to the above change. SUB - COMMITTEE REPORTS ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE REVIEW SUB - COMMITTEE PBSD REVISED ORDINANCE ENACTMENT Mr. Carroll explained that several subjects were covered at the December 17, 2001 meeting of the Organization Structure Sub - committee. The first subject was the Comparison Summary that we had asked Mr. Bawduniak to prepare. The Summary was discussed in detail. We then discussed the agenda for the Public Forums, which will be held on January 7th, January 14th and January 23rd. Our thinking was that I would open the meeting and comment briefly on the role of the MSTBU and the Sub - committee. At that time we would pass out the Comparison Summary to those in attendance and include a couple of things that are really part of the Summary. One item is Mr. Brock's consensus points and those have been published many times. They are the eight reference points that Mr. Brock made that basically got him to the point where he produced the Ordinance that we are now considering. There are also some other new Ordinance considerations, which are built into the Comparison Summary. We would then introduce Mr. Brock and have him address the attendees. Mr. Brock has indicated that is what he would like to do. At that point we would open the meeting to questions from the audience and that is basically the agenda that we had planned. Mr. Carroll continued that the third thing that we covered was the plans to publicize the meeting. We talked about the need for the people in Pelican Bay to know about these Forums and to do the best we can at getting the message to them. We also have said that it is quite possible that only a few people would be interested and we are going to have our three meetings, even if nobody attends. In a way of a plan to publicize this we had to publish an article in the Pelican Post. I had to write that article right after the December 17th meeting because there was pressure on getting that done and it is very close to what the Comparison is. I also had to tie in some previous comments I had made on this subject in my write -up. We also said we were going 4709 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J 2 January 2, 2002 .- to be able to use Mr. Brock's website and Mrs. Smith was to arrange to have Notices posted there. Mrs. Smith did inform us that our website is set up and running and all pertinent information has been posted to that site. Then we said we would publish some Notices that we would like placed at various locations throughout Pelican Bay. Notices will be posted on Channel 96 and we had talked about putting the Comparison on that Channel, but we decided against that. Mr. Roellig stated that the meeting notices have been running on Channel 96. Mr. Carroll stated that on January 14th there is a President's Council Meeting and there are some thirty to forty condominium Presidents that attend. We would like to pass out notices to them at that time and encourage the Presidents to post them in their condominiums and to encourage people to attend the meetings. The last bit of publicity we talked about was the Naples Daily News. After some discussion we said that we would ask Mr. Ward to prepare a press release, which would basically contain the times and place of the Forums. Mr. Carroll stated that there were a few other comments made at the meeting, which are worth repeating. Mr. Cross, Mr. Brock's Executive Assistant, attended the meeting and he made the point again that we shouldn't call the proposed selection process to be used in the new Ordinance an "election" because it is not an official Florida election. We have called it a "selection" and a "recommendation ", but we don't want to call it any form of an "election ". We also talked about the fact that Commissioner Carter had sent a letter about following proper procedures in order to produce a document such as we did. Mr. Brock has assured us that he was well aware of that letter and that we were complying with his suggestions and recommendations. There was one last point about who was going to pay for this selection. The proposal does say that Mr. Brock's office would pay for this selection and Mr. Ward brought up the suggestion of whether the County would pay for it using MSTBU funds or not. Mr. Cross assured us this would not be so. We don't know the inner workings of that, but in any event we are assuming that the County would pay for the first selection. Commissioner Carter stated that if you choose to go that direction, the Clerk has assured me that would be followed one time. The future would have to be determined by Pelican Bay. 4710 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J z January 2, 2002 Initially, that's where we are. Mr. Brock has been just outstanding in working with me to bring this through the proper process, not only for this community but also for future situations in all communities in Collier County. Mr. Carroll stated that if you look at the Comparison, the format that we chose is what you see. I am going to ask Mr. Bawduniak to take us through the Summary. Mr. Bawduniak explained that the way we approached this was that the prime objective was in simple terms to come out with a document which was short and easy to read so that it would be read, as opposed to something longer in detail that our citizens just may not want to take the time to read. The zero draft was strictly lifting exact terms and phrases from the existing Ordinance and the modification to the Ordinance, which would have a new Ordinance number. We have to be careful not to think of it as a new Ordinance because it is really a reiteration of the old Ordinance with a few key points. The Sub - committee met and went through it point -by -point and had some very constructive suggestions. We had a couple of very good points made by attendees in the audience and they have all been incorporated. The only departure from pure fact and extraction is the one dealing with the cost of each straw poll or selection process. At that time we had been told that the County would bare the cost of this process, but we didn't really understand if they would pay for every one of them or just the first one. What we expected is what Commissioner Carter just delivered to us today and is the fact that the first one is going to be taken care of by the County and subsequent ones are going to be paid for by the MSTBU. This means we pay for the selection process and we made the assumption that it would be on an ERU basis so that each election year the cost would be approximately $1.90 per property owner and an election would not be held every year. Having said all of that that represents our efforts not to editorialize, not to bias, but just in simple terms to try and help inform the people we work for. Mr. Werner stated that I congratulate you. It is so nice to read something that is not "governmenteze ". It makes a lot of sense and is a good comparison. Mr. John Domenie asked that on Page 5 the last sentence, "Nominees receiving a plurality of ballots in each category..." what does each category mean? 4711 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J January 2, 2002 , Mr. Bawduniak replied, "Residential and Business ". Mr. Brown stated that it is down the road, but a poll tax was considered illegal years ago. Should it be an ERU or Ad valorem tax because it could be construed as a poll tax? Mr. Bawduniak stated that is a question for Mr. Ward, but I am not sure it would even show. This is going to come under some nebulous cost for the community. Mr. Brown stated that the poll tax was $1.00 and it was declared unconstitutional. Mr. Ward stated that Mr. Brown is right in terms of a pure poll tax in terms of going to the polls. In terms of including the cost of an election in the budget that is assessed across all residents equally is a legal way in Florida to assess residents. You couldn't charge them to go to the poll, but you certainly could include it in your budget and put it on the tax bill. Mr. Bawduniak stated that our main objective was to let people know what it would cost Pelican Bay. Mr. Werner stated that at the bottom of Page 6 it says that the terms of some of the existing Committee members will be extended for a short period of time as new members are phased -in and in the Executive Summary the objective is to appoint these people for another four- year term. Mr. Vlasho stated that the Executive Summary for the current four individuals that are going off the Committee should have their terms expire after this meeting. They have agreed to continue until this Ordinance is resolved, but the way Ms. Filson has drafted this it is extending the terms for four years. I am not sure the four members have agreed to that. Commissioner Carter replied that by ordinance four years is how it is structured and they can leave at any time. That is why when you do one of these appointments it is really standard language. Mr. Vlasho asked what would happen if this Ordinance were approved in March, we would have no one to elect because the terms would be on going until the following year? Commissioner Carter replied, "I will get with legal counsel in the morning ". Mr. Werner stated that it was not the intent of this Committee to have the members reappointed for four years. They have agreed to serve until the selection is able to be held. 4712 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 2, 2002 16,1 2 Mr. Vlasho stated that the cover letter from Mr. Ward explains what we tried to accomplish. Mr. Carroll stated that we will proceed and Monday will be our first Forum and we are hoping that some of the community will attend. Mr. Brock is ready to go and we think we have done what we had set out to do. Mr. Vlasho stated that you and your Sub - committee have done exactly what you were asked to do and the presentation looks very nice. Even the Notices are attractive and we appreciate your efforts. CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE Mr. Roellig reported that the Minutes from our November Meeting were included in your agenda package and discussed at your December meeting. We have not had a meeting since November, but I do anticipate having a meeting in January. Since Mr. Ward has come up with the summary I think I will ask him to go through the Clam Bay portion at this time. CLAM BAY ANNUAL MONITORING & IMPROVEMENT SCHEDULE Mr. Ward reported that this is the first time that you have seen the revised Monitoring and Maintenance Schedule for calendar year 2002. We have updated this to reflect what the Sub- committee reviewed in depth back in late November and what the full Advisory Committee looked at in early December. The Monitoring Program as you see it is essentially what you have seen in the past year. There are no changes to it other than being an update of the schedule itself. In terms of the program requirements, the beach nourishment or dune restoration project has now been included, along with the rerouting of Systems III /IV of the water management system itself. The plantings are also included along with some of the interior tidal channels. One comment that I will make is that the dredging of Clam Pass, as I noted in the report, was delayed because of a breakdown in the dredge that the contractor uses to dredge Clam Pass. The dredge is expected to be here next week and they anticipate starting work late next week. From what I understand from the consultants is that he is generally a good contractor and other than a mechanical problem I don't really see any problems in the dredging process itself. 4713 n PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J 2 January 2, 2002 Mr. Domenie stated that it would be interesting if the last item were a total to show the cost for all of the various items together and perhaps show how much is coming from our funds and how much is being provided by Collier County. Mr. Vlasho asked Mr. Ward to speak to the letter from the St. Laurent Condo Association. Mr. Ward replied, "I have been on vacation and just saw the letter today'. The letter had been forwarded from Commissioner Carter's office along with four or five others. I have drafted a letter for response and I will send you a copy. We have indicated in the letter that the State certainly looks to the County and other agencies to remove exotics, including cattails, as we can throughout these ecosystems and that we do expect this program to take a period of time, at least another year or so before we start to see any results from it. We appreciate the community's understanding of this time in which we are really trying to restore an ecosystem to what it was many years ago and this is an integral part of that process. Mr. Vlasho asked with the dredging of the pass, will we get more saltwater back in there or is that not going to impact it? Mr. Ward replied, "I think it might have a little impact, but the real impact will come as more of the interior tidal channels are cut through the upper Clam Bay system this coming yeas'. 1 assume if you have gone out and looked at Systems II and IV recently you have seen a lot of the freshwater that was being held in that area drain off, which is exactly what we expected to happen. That means when tidal water comes into that system you are going to get saltwater up into that area and saltwater immediately kills cattails. The flushing, along with the interior tidal channel cuts, will be a significant impact on the System III and IV cattails. Mr. Vlasho asked if you have had a chance to look into the conversation we had about the water constantly running from the east side of the berm? Mr. Ward replied. "It was raining today, but I will get out there early next week to look at that ". Mr. Vlasho stated that we would lower the level of the water in all of Pelican Bay with it running out those holes. 4714 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J 21 January 2, 2002 Mr. Carroll stated that I am concerned about the appearance of that area. We keep saying it is going to be a year or so and we get these various comments like we did in the letter. I don't know if other members have the same experience as I, but when I go to one of those buildings they drag me out on the balcony and tell me to look at that area. I would feel better if we had a more definitive plan for improving the appearance of that area. The explanation that we were going to have to do it anyway or that nature might do it doesn't seem to be sitting well. I don't know what to do, but it would seem to me if we could do some plantings to indicate we had some ideas or what we were thinking or planning might help them to understand it. Mr. Ward replied, "I do not disagree and I will put our former Chairman's hat on for a second ". If you go into any one of the condominiums in Bay Colony and look down on those 54 acres they see, and have for many years, a very similar look to what you see in Systems III and IV now. Both of those areas are problem areas and the mangroves in the 54 acres are going to take a long time to restore, similar to Systems III and IV. It is a time consuming process and unfortunately I don't know and have not been made aware by Mr. Turrell, and we have talked about this numerous times, about what you can do in System III and IV that would help alleviate the visual problem that you have. If you look at it in context, it is no different than the visual problem that you see in the Bay Colony area with the 54 acres and the condo units that are looking over that. It is a similar problem. I am sure this is new to the condominium unit residents versus Bay Colony where it has been there for a few years. They are tired of complaining about it and are just watching it at the moment and we will just have to work through this problem at a reasonable pace. I don't know a quick solution to it. Mr. Vlasho stated that a little more water in there might help. You are right when you look down, but when you are out riding it is a matter of preference. I personally think it looks nicer, its open and there are more birds. I don't particularly like the brown, but as far as being able to see, rather than going through a tunnel it is nicer. Mr. Roellig stated I don't know how your mail is running on this, but I think people are appreciating the greater abundance of wildlife. The perception varies from A to Z and I think we 4715 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J January 2, 2002 are on the right track. This has been discussed in the Pelican Bay Post several times over the past year and I think your response is an appropriate response. Mr. Bawduniak stated that the rationale that you just gave via Dr. Varley's previous viewpoints makes sense, but it is a bad answer. You don't tell the people that the guys at the other end have been having problems for years. That is not an answer. Mr. Ward replied, "I did not put that in the letter". Mr. Bawduniak stated that Mr. Suziedelis has approached me and one of the things that I got from him was do you guys really have a plan? I said to him that there are a lot of things to be looked at as to what is possible and realistic there. If there is some way that you could at least have a general set of alternatives to give them an idea that we have some general direction that we are heading, without a selection of specifics. That may go a long way in at least helping them to understand that they are going to be looking at something not too pretty for a while, but we are at least thinking about what it will look like in the future, rather than we don't know and it is going to take a long while. You might try that approach, and when you do will you copy each of us on the letter? Mr. Ward replied, "Yes ". Mr. John Domenie stated that I noticed, judging from one of the gauges in front of the Claridge, that it appears the water from the highest mark to where it is now has dropped as much as 16 inches. I also notice that the water also seems to be ebbing all the time and I have never seen saltwater entering the new channels. Mr. Ward replied, "It is that time of year". Mr. Domenie stated that it appears to me that the land at the northern end sits higher than the land at the southern end, so I don't even know if you could use the same plants in both locations. I am going to go off on a completely different tangent and ask has anybody ever considered digging out all that muck and just have a lake, although it would cost a fortune? Mr. Vlasho replied, "I like that solution ". Mr. Ward replied, "That was a bottleneck area anyway and has always held freshwater and that is why the cattails were there. Freshwater is what makes cattails grow and the minute 4716 PELICAN BAY AnvmnRY CnMNII'ITFF 16J 2 January 2, 2002 you put tidal cuts in there, that freshwater will exit and those cattails would have died no matter what any one would have done. With respect to the changes in elevation, you are right that there is an elevation change moving from north to south in Pelican Bay. The southern end of Pelican Bay is definitely lower than the north end and you are absolutely right, we have recognized for some period of time now that what we put at one end probably will not do well at the other end and that is part of the process that Mr. Lukasz and the consultants are going through right now. If you want to make it a lake and you are willing to fund it, we are willing to do it. Mr. Domenie asked if it was still necessary to divert water from System III to System IV with these new cuts? Mr. Ward replied, "I don't know the answer to that question ". I am going to let Mr. Lewis and Mr. Turrell tell me whether that is a good idea or not and they have not gotten into that issue yet. Commissioner Carter stated that I have gotten all of the same letters and have sent them over to Mr. Ward. I have responded with a letter of my own saying that it is part of the restoration process. I had one lady call me this afternoon who is not happy, but when we finished the conversation she was not as mad as when we started talking. What I think we need is to increase the water level to change the appearance. That is what they are complaining about. I think they are saying I don't like the looks of it and what are you going to do to make it look nice? Our challenge is, what are some options to make it look better? You have good consultants and the Department of Natural Resources within the County and I would encourage all to sit down together and discuss what possibilities we can do with this to enhance this restoration process. This is the only NRPA we have in the Growth Management Plan. Even though the County is up against the wall in a lot of ways in terms of funding for the number one priority of roads, we have got to go to the State with our Rural Fringe and Rural Transition Statements and this NRPA is still an important part of our Growth Management Plan. I don't know if there is any State or Federal process to get some funding here, but I think we need to be a little creative on this issue. If we ignore it, it will just get worse and we need to really communicate a positive in that it will look better. Even though the Board of County Commissioners is not directly responsible for this, we 4717 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J January 2, 2002 are at the top of this thing and will keep our hands off of it, but if we keep getting comments back you may be dealing with the other Commissioners who may not necessarily have an appreciation for the whole project. I would really hate to see it go there. Mr. Vlasho asked Mr. Ward, "How many letters or calls we have received "? Mr. Ward replied, "We have had seven to ten letters ". Frankly, it was a form letter that was sent to everybody, asking them to change the name and date and send it to your Commissioner. Mr. Werner stated that unless I have been dosing off during the meetings, our plan was to dig the channels, kill the cattails, see what elevations and salinity that we had to deal with, put test plantings in there and then put in whatever is appropriate. It is not like we are sitting on our hands and not doing anything. It just takes time. Mr. Ward stated that it takes time. The time constraints that we have to deal with in that area are that we haven't been through a rainy season yet with those interior tidal creeks. I did want to wait through one rainy season to do monthly elevation checks on those levels to see what kinds of plantings would be appropriate. I have the same concerns as everyone. Mr. Vlasho asked if there was a way to pump some of saltwater into that area? Would that be possible? Mr. Ward replied, "I don't think so, but I can look at that ". Mr. Werner stated that one positive note from the cattail removal is that my friends in the Marbella do not have to deal with the seedlings from the cattails being stuck on their screens any longer. Mr. Ward stated that clearly in the short term it is not pretty when you are looking at it from above, but it is going to take some time to deal with it. We do have a good proactive approach with a plan. The next step is to evaluate it and test it and see what we are going to be able to plant in there and then come up with a good planting program that will work over time. Mr. Vlasho stated that this is one case where no matter what we do it does not get to the right people. 4718 PELICAN BAY ADVISnRV CnMM1TT9:F 161 2 January 2, 2002 Mr. Ward stated that one letter I did see said that we were going to have mangroves in there and I don't know where that came from. I don't think mangroves are going to grow in that area. Mr. Domenie stated that I was hoping that someone from St. Laurent would have been here today. This was started long before I came on the Committee and is not something new. Mr. Ward reported that the improvements to the Phase I project are complete and we will start the Phase II project in April of 2002. Mr. Carroll stated that I raised this question before and you gave me an answer and I guess I need to hear it again, but why is it necessary go ahead with Phase II this year? When I drive down the Boulevard it looks pretty good to me and I just wonder if this is something we can postpone a year or two and not spend the money? Mr. Ward replied, "One of the primary focuses of the program was for the replacement of what is an aging irrigation system now going on twenty some off years old and possibly seventeen years old in this Phase II and III area ". As we are updating that irrigation system and replacing it with a substantially more efficient irrigation system and computerizing it, we are also going through and upgrading the landscaping program. We are changing some of the beds out, making it more water efficient and putting them in locations that the sprinklers are better able to handle. That has been the intent of the program for five to seven years and that it where we are with Phase II and Phase III. You have budgeted for it for a couple of years now. I can tell you that I can look at what has been finished in Phase I versus what Phase II looks like and you do get a different feel and look. One of the other things we began to look at a few years ago was that because the landscaping in Pelican Bay was designed and constructed as development occurred, it changed over time and you saw a different look and feel of the landscaping palette throughout this community as you drove through it. One of the things we are doing is also providing some consistency in the landscaping palette and program from beginning to end, based upon current day standards with similar materials, similar installation techniques and similar 4719 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J January 2 2002 locations. The whole program from reconstruction of that aging irrigation system to making it more water efficient, changing the palette, trying to clear up some of the visibility issues and to deal with some of the street lighting issues was a whole encompassing program that we started a number of years ago. That is why Phase II is here this year. Mr. Carroll stated that you mentioned aging irrigation system. Are we having a problem with leaking pipes and things that are causing you to want to do this quickly? Mr. Ward replied, "In terms of the aging irrigation system yes ". They do break down relatively frequently. There are no automatic controls and it is all a very manual system. We have 10,000+ irrigation heads in this community that we manage on a day -to -day basis with one irrigation technician and the intent was to try and change that. We have gone from rotor heads to pop up spray heads that are substantially more water efficient. One of the complaints that I have gotten through twenty plus years is that I have just gotten my car washed and it is soaked with irrigation water and now I want you to pay for a new car wash for me. That was the primary focus. Mr. Vlasho stated that on the positive note, 1 have gotten a lot of positive comments on the south half of Pelican Bay Boulevard. It is nice and open and looks good. On the north end even though it may have been more recent plantings, they did get carried away in certain places. My understanding is that the second half will be a little less complicated. Mr. Ward replied, "Much less complicated ". The first phase was exacerbated because of the grass kill that we had, so it looked like a war zone for a long period of time. Phase II is not nearly as pronounced as what you saw in Phase I. We are going to tear up strips of sod to redo the irrigation system, but the tree removals and the bed changes will not be as extensive as what you saw in Phase I. COMMUNITY ISSUES U.S. 41 LANDSCAPING Mr. Ward explained that I have read in the newspapers the same things that you have all read with respect to the U. S. 41 Median Landscaping Program. Since Mr. Kant is here I will allow him to report on this program. 4720 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J January 2, 2002 Mr. Kant explained that there are now trees in portions of the US 41 median. That project is due to be substantially complete in about two weeks and we are flogging the contractor to get it complete even a few days ahead of schedule. We have been getting regular requests to make sure that there is not something we can do to speed it up. The problem with this is due to the fact this work was done before we got FDOT to change some of their specifications. We actually had to pull some of the dirt out, put decent growing dirt back in, plus it is a brand new irrigation system and if you don't get it in right you have nothing but problems. One of the issues we have to look at and I want to thank you very much for doing, is the irrigation system you are doing on Pelican Bay Boulevard. When you have all of the excess water ending up on the pavement, even if it is reuse water, it doesn't do the pavement any good. You are going to get better water efficiency on your plants and find that your roads are going to last a lot longer and look a lot better. Mr. Kant continued that Phase II of U.S. 41, which is from Gulf Park Drive north, is under design and the contract was awarded to McGee and Associates. Mr. McGee has done quite a few median landscape projects in Collier County and we are very pleased with his work. I don't have an exact date of when that will be done, but it may be moved because there is no funding set up for it. I believe in your budget you set up $250,000 and we are still estimating the project at $500,000 but as you are aware the County has been reprioritizing and reordering what it is going to be doing with the funds that it has available. While we still feel very strongly about aesthetic improvements, we are being given our direction to concentrate on safety and capacity improvements. As we stand here today there is no current funding for moving forward with that project and unless something changes drastically I don't see it happening in the next couple of fiscal years. We will have the plans complete, we will be able to move forward to some extent and fortunately as part of the FDOT project they put the sleeves in and we will not have to go back and dig up the road. That is the good news, but the bad news is that we cannot tell you when the project is going to get done. Mr. Ward stated that we are going to mark these minutes for those sleeves being placed under U.S. 41 for future reference. Mr. Kant stated that we would have the as -built plans that we can supply. 4721 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J 2� January 2, 2002 Mr. Werner stated that I did not know that report was coming, but I was anticipating that we wouldn't be getting the funding from the County for at least a couple of years. We were supposed to share the costs with the County and I think it is important that we get the landscaping done. If the Committee supports this idea, why don't we advance the money for the landscaping with the understanding that the County would repay us when funds become available and try to get it done this summer, rather than waiting two or three years? Mr. Vlasho asked Mr. Ward if we had any reserves that we could use? Mr. Kant stated that you have a total of almost $1,000,000 in reserves in your operating capital. Mr. Ward stated that the cost is $250,000 and I suspect that we probably do have enough somewhere in the reserves to cover it. Mr. Kant stated that there is no reason why you cannot approach the Board of County Commissioners with that issue. You have a Commissioner who is a resident and sitting here who can possibly champion that. Again, anything that is done on that basis, even if the Commission says fine, we still have to have a plan to repay it and as I said at the current time all the money that would normally be put toward that has been allocated and I don't see that changing. I am not the policy maker, but the response to your suggestion is certainly that it is doable, but you would have to have the Commission's approval with a repayment plan. Mr. Brown stated that we budgeted $250,000 for the south end and our bill came in at $239,000, but that included curbs and sleeves that had to be installed. At the north end the sleeves and curbs are already there and it should go in for a lot less than $239,000. 1 don't think the distance is any greater. Mr. Kant stated that is a good thought, a good approach and is a good point. When we get a little further in the design process with a preliminary design from Mr. McGee I will be happy to share that with you, as we will share them with the Commissioners and my group to make sure that we look at our program for the next few years. If it turns out that it is significantly less, that's great. It is very possible that there will be some savings, but what it is we cannot tell you until we get a little further in the design process. 4722 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 2, 2002 161 Mr. Vlasho stated that before we talk about spending more money, what happened when we made the deal that it would be funded 50/50? We immediately put up our funds and although we understand your situation, where is your money? Mr. Kant replied, "I have asked that question on some other projects that we had in other areas ". That was then, this is now. This is reality we are dealing with and funds are not available. Mr. Domenie asked if we are planning on installing a traffic signal at the corner of North Pointe Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road? I notice that underground strips have been installed to trip lights. Mr. Kant replied, "I believe that there is a signal going in there ". We have about one -half dozen going in at various locations. Mr. Domenie asked if there was any possibility of paving North Pointe Drive? There are about five manhole covers there and it is a very bumpy section. Mr. Kant stated that is one of the areas on our list and we have noticed that. My concern and I have had a number of concerns on a number of streets here in the northern end of Pelican Bay, pretty much from Gulf Park Drive north. There is something going on under some of the side streets off of Oakmont Parkway. We don't know what it is, but we have done a lot of repairs. My first reaction when this started a few years ago was that it was some shoddy workmanship. Now I am not so sure what it is and there may be something happening underground where we are having something happening to the water table. We spotted two or three other areas and it just appears to be in this northern area of Pelican Bay. I am aware of it and we are looking into it, but I cannot give you an answer right now. SIDEWALK OVERLAY AND REPAIRS Mr. Ward explained that Phase I and Phase II are being done. The County is in the process of doing the work and we are funding the bio- barrier installation as part of that program and I have provided to you the cost of that installation for Phase I and II this year. For Phase III, which is essentially one -third of the project, the bio- barrier is another $33,000. We literally do not have funds budgeted for that in the current fiscal year and I am not so sure Mr. Kant was going to 4723 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J 21 January 2, 2002 do Phase III this year anyway. We are going to budget that in our next fiscal year budget and I believe Mr. Kant will budget sufficient amounts of money to do the sidewalk overlays for the Phase III area which is about one -third of the community. Mr. Kant stated that if anyone is out there watching over what is happening, please tell you neighbors that bio- barrier is pretty nasty material. We do our best to clean up every scrap because it will leave a nasty welt on your fingers if you touch it. NORTH PELICAN BAY BOULEVARD TRAFFIC SIGNAL Mr. Kant explained that the traffic signal issue is very simple. We are not opposed to moving the box, but we just don't think the taxpayers of Collier County should pay for it. It is an aesthetic issue and is not a matter of moving it because it is in the wrong place. As I pointed out almost two years ago, I was a little concerned because those boxes are made shiny for a reason, which is to reflect the heat. When you take that shine away from them you tend to cause problems with the electronics and we were very fortunate that we have not had too many problems with this one. If you want it moved that is fine, we will be happy to move it, but I would not be fulfilling my duty to the people of Collier County by having it come out of some general fund. Mr. Carroll stated that there are two things that are factors there. There is a disconnect box that sits at that location on a pole about four to five feet in the air and when you are turning left from U.S. 41 onto Pelican Bay Boulevard that is what you see the most. It blocks our entire sign. The controller, which is ten to fifteen feet to the right, also blocks it but not nearly as much as the disconnect. To me that is a relatively simple thing to move as compared too moving the entire control box. Mr. Kant stated that the only thing I have ever noticed is the controller. If it is a power location, FP&L can change that location. I will take a look at that on my way out. I could see the big green thing and I thought that's what the issue was. Mr. Vlasho asked if anyone has taken notice of how it appears with the new traffic support poles up? Those poles are not going to move. If you move the green box would you change it 1 % or 50 %? You have a massive thing there anyway with the support poles. 4724 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE JbJ 21 January 2, 2002 Mr. Ward replied, "My opinion is you change it 1 % ". Those poles are going to be massive in any event. Mr. Brown stated that the ugly poles reduce the ugliness of the box. Mr. Vlasho asked what direction the Committee wants to give Mr. Ward on the $2,100 to move the control box? Mr. Werner suggested we hold it until next meeting to see if we want to do anything. U.S. 41 STREET LIGHTING (GULF PARK DRIVE TO SEGATE DRIVE) Mr. Ward explained that we would be submitting an MPO Application for the street lighting along U.S. 41 from Gulf Park Drive south to Seagate Drive. It will have to go through the Board of County Commissioners to get to the MPO. I am in the middle of finishing that application which will go through Mr. Kant's department and on to the Board of County Commissioners for consideration sometime in the near future. Mr. Kant explained that for some of you who are not familiar with the process, what will happen is if that is accepted as part of the improvement program for FDOT that will go into what is called the sixth year, which will be their fiscal year 2007. Fiscal year 2002 through 2006 is their five -year program. That sounds way out there, but the beauty of it and we have seen this happen, is that projects tend to get moved in and out. Sometimes they will find that for some reason they need a small project moved in a couple of years and they will take a small project like lighting and move it up. Sometimes they will find that their estimates on another project are wrong and they have money that they have to use before the end of the year and they will move a project forward. We have seen that happen on occasion, but right now the only thing we can tell you for certain is that the process requires it to be put in the new fifth year, which is the sixth year of the current program. Once it is submitted almost anything can happen. The other point is, depending upon the cost estimate, many times if advance funding is found FDOT will pay it back at the point at which it would have shown up in their program. There are some possibilities there and I would encourage you to do what you can to get it into their program. As you are aware when this issue came up a few years ago, we asked them and tried to get them to make it an add 4725 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J 2 ,.. January 2, 2002 on to this current six laning project and we kept getting turned down. I think your best bet at this point is to get it into their program. Mr. Werner asked if there was anything new on the flagpoles? Mr. Lukasz replied, "I have one more set of prices coming from the contractor and we should be able to award the bid ". Mr. Werner asked the Committee's thoughts on moving up the median landscaping program on the north end of U.S. 41? Mr. Brown stated that I would like to see them come in with a price first and we would then have to have some assurance that the County would pay it back. Mr. Werner stated that whether it is $470,000 or $370,000 and I think the price we had for curbing was $60,000, but regardless, we are committed to paying for one -half of it. Mr. Brown stated that I would rather see us put pressure on the County to live up to their half of the bargain. Commissioner Carter replied, `That is not going to happen because we do not have the money for accessory projects ". I have to tell you that our first and top priority is to build roads. We will do those roads and they will not be pretty, but they will be safe and they will be efficient. All of these other things are ancillary projects. I don't like it, but these are the cards I was handed, which is the judgment of the Board of County Commissioners and aesthetics are way down on the priority list. Mr. Ward stated that I tend to work all over the State with respect to these kinds of issues. You live in a County that has a very low Ad valorem tax rate, very low franchise fees and utility taxes and your gas tax revenue is not as great as what it could have been with the defeat of the tax you just had. That puts significant pressure on municipal governments to try to provide for transportation needs in a population base that is growing faster than the money is growing. What you see are counties that have to prioritize to these health, safety and welfare issues in terms of construction of roads to meet the growing demands of the population. You have a $1,000,000,000 loss in the State economy this year from the September 11'h tragedy with a dramatic affect on sales tax and gas tax. I don't see money that we use to build roads in the 4726 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J 2 January 2, 2002 State of Florida changing statewide for a couple of years. With all due respect to the Commission, I think they are probably doing absolutely everything they can to try to meet the needs of Collier County in a growing population and shrinking monetary base. That is a problem in these kinds of programs that are really more aesthetic than they are health, safety and welfare related and are going to get pushed way down on the priority list. I think the Commissioner is correct in saying a couple of years and I would suspect that it is going to be a lot longer out before you ever see money from Collier County for these kinds of aesthetic programs. Mr. Carroll stated that I think Mr. Werner's idea is a good one. I can't help but feel the work that has been done should result in a lower price and as I drive down U. S. 41 it appears the medians actually seem narrower than the ones to the south. Maybe there is a good chance that the costs will be significantly lower and that we could afford to pay for it ourselves. Mr. Werner stated I am not suggesting we pay for it ourselves. I am suggesting that we pay for it now, but the County pays us back. Mr. Roellig stated that it is something we should really look at because I think it would be a good idea to get it done. It is not going to be cheaper if you wait ten years or so to put it in. Mr. Bawduniak stated that the idea has merit, but it is a little too early to look at it without � Is there all of the details. Mr. Ward, is this a viable approach or are we blazing new territory. historical precedent where in essence an MSTBU is advancing some funds to be returned at a future date, over a future period, because next year they might be in bigger trouble over roads and the priority could slip further? Mr. Ward replied, "Realistically, I think the best you are going to get out of the Commission is what you got a few years ago, which was a handshake promise to pay if the funds are available ". Most Commissions, whether it is this Commission or others that I went before, it is very hard to bind a future Commission to pay you from funds for this kind of a program. If I went before this Commission or any other Board of County Commissioners tomorrow with this kind of approach they are all going to tell you we lust don't know in this day and age exactly when or if we are going to be able to repay you for those funds. That is the reality of what government 4727 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J 2. . January 2, 2002 is working in, post September 11 t". If you want to do it I wouldn't have my hopes up real high that you are going to get that money back and it is blazing new territory. Mr. Vlasho stated that I was somewhat involved way back when the Pelican Bay Property Owners got it into their bailiwick and the thinking at that time was that we might pay for all of it. That was the original thinking and the real hang up was how could we get the funds. We talked about raising funds and going out for volunteer donations, etc. It then came back to the MSTBU and subsequent to that, the arrangement with the County was made. Whether we get our money back or not, my feeling was if we hadn't made the deal with the County we probably would have went ahead and funded it all. The second thing is that this is not necessarily on Mr. Kant or the staff, but somewhere in the whole process and I lay it at the original designer of the project, someone came to us and said I always get these grants from the State and it is not a sure thing, but almost a sure thing and that delayed us for nine months or so. We then got into a process of redesigning it which means that somebody screwed up on the original design and in the meantime time rolls on and we would have had the money in the budget this year had we been on the proper timetable. We really got shafted on the whole process and I just wanted the Record to state that. Sometimes we get accused of not doing our job or being on top of things and other times we are the victims of circumstances. Mr. Werner explained that Mr. Ward, Mr. Ilschner and myself made the deal and brought it back to this Committee for approval. We agreed to commit approximately $500,000 of the cost of doing that in return for us getting the maintenance fees for Clam Bay paid for nine years at $60,000 a year, plus about $150,000 for the first year. We got a lot of value back for that. I do not let the County off the hook for this whether we do or do not get paid, but I still think we have to say you have to live up to your deal some time or another when you have the funds. Mr. Vlasho stated that the sense of direction I am hearing is that Mr. Ward and Mr. Kant should get us a budget and time frame and let us know how quickly it could be done. Mr. Brown explained that I am not saying go or no go, but I think all of the bases ought to be covered. It is not in Pelican Bay, it is out on U.S. 41 and would it be possible to have Pine Ridge involved financially? 4728 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J 24 January 2, 2002 Mr. Kant stated that Pine Ridge has a Beautification Committee as part of their Homeowners Association and they have been quite diligent to continue the work they started along the west edge of Trail Boulevard on the east side of U.S. 41. 1 know they have made a commitment and put a significant amount of money into that and they hope to get it finished this year now that FDOT is out of there. I don't live there and I can't make any prognostications about it, but I think that I can safely say that professionally that would be a hard sell. Mr. Vlasho stated that my recollection was that was approached early on and it went nowhere and that is why we backed up and did it the way we did. I don't recall who shot whom on the deal, but it became a non - possibility. Commissioner Carter stated that I think you have one other player in all of this and that is the business interests along that section. If you go south that is primarily residential, but as you come north it is commercial. What about the Marketplace and all the business interests along the east side who may be willing to be a player if approached? I don't know, but it is surely worthy of a try. Mr. Vlasho stated that is a good idea. Commissioner Carter stated that there are a lot of expectations out there of what County government is going to do. There is going to be a lot of cost cutting and a lot of breakdown past the fat and into the bone in a lot of areas. Mr. Werner stated that the Marketplace is already going to be contributing, but I would be happy once the information is available to approach the businesses on the eastside of U.S. 41 about contributing. Mr. Kant stated that we should have something for you by next month. FINANCIAL STATEMENT REVIEW Mr. Vlasho stated that the financials speak for themselves. Mr. Ward replied, "At this point they do ". Mr. Werner asked Mr. Ward the meaning of "rolled encumbrances "? Mr. Ward replied, "Purchase Orders that are open at year -end and we have rolled them from prior years funds ". 4729 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 161 January 2, 2002 Mr. Wemer asked if we ever got Mr. Hilstad paid? I have noticed that he is no longer on the list. Mr. Ward replied, "I think that is no longer an issue ". Mr. Domenie asked if a motion was needed for the sidewalk overlays? Mr. Ward replied, "No sir, I do not". Mr. Domenie asked if there is anything new on the flap gates and have they been removed? Mr. Lukasz stated that you have to go through a work order system to get the contractor started and then open a Purchase Order. Mr. Domenie stated that the Mangrove Action Group has their Annual Meeting on January 17'h. Perhaps some of the people from St. Laurant could attend that meeting as it might be beneficial to them. COMMITTEE REQUESTS Mr. Vlasho stated that I received a phone call from Mr. lazzo about the discussion on the berm along the east side of Pelican Bay and the berm planting. We had a brief conversation and they would like for us to consider that we would hold up on our planting process until they have had a chance to examine it and come back with a recommendation of how it can be planted more fully, tighter and now they have added carbon monoxide to their list of intruders. They are concerned about security, noise and now odor. He has a letter or article that talks about if it were done properly how this would help and I reminded him that all of our discussions have been contrary to that and that vegetation does not help with any of those issues. I asked him to send me the article, but I just wanted to advise the Committee that discussion is going on. I don't know what, if anything, we can do about it or should do about it. Our position has always been that there is nothing different that we should do. Mr. Ward replied, "That is correct." Mr. Roellig asked the status of that work? Mr. Ward replied, "it is on -going and should be completed by March ". Mr. Roellig asked about the Vanderbilt Beach Garage item? 4730 PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE 16J January 2, 2002 Mr. Vlasho replied, "Mr. Harrell requested that this item be added to the agenda, however he is not here ". AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION Mr. Jim Gage — Coronado — I have good news and bad news. The good news is that the people in our building are generally understanding of the problems with the cattails and mostly express a position that things look better out there. I have two concerns that bother me as an owner here, one of which is we have a multi - million dollar potential mangrove situation and I find it disturbing that the Committee would consider spending money out on the U. S. 41 median strip when we have potential problems and the need for funds that far outweigh the aesthetics. We are talking about prioritizing where we spend our money. Mr. Ward's office has been very cooperative in getting the information to the owners as to what they are doing in the mangroves, but I think we should consider this. We lived for many years in Pebble Creek while our condo was being built and during that time when you walked the berm the water to the east was clear and you could see wildlife, fish and turtles. If you go out there today there is nothing. In my opinion there is a bigger problem going on in the mangroves and I have been here before to talk to you about it. My own position as a layman is that I feel that the problem is multi- source. I think the condos themselves are big polluters. If you think of all of the garage floors that are washed, all the cooking that goes on, the situation is really bad. I say to you as an owner, I am very disturbed. I support you in what you are trying to do with the cattails, but I am very disturbed and I think you should be concerned, if you think about those things in relativity, why you would even consider using any reserve funds for these median strips. ADJOURN There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 4:30 P.M. Mr. Lou Vlasho, Chairman 4731 30(�ornD 1 -'% rGd CD ?7 fD � - ' C_l0� rOcOi> >O. '<��o0 rD � O K O�c —�-r o, cr*O=rcOn�� cn CD CD cn CD p .� � -fn -0 . D f�DO to cu � cn .0 rt v) 0 O . ro�WOW c��CD (DgffiDOrO -r = �Otnv pO (nwrD'::jCD c::43o,�� 0- O :3, p c0 -00� (D0 R :na a- C:L � =' p (nn 0 � CD 0��CD Q CD � w CD =r- Q. ?= 3 [D cn CD cord O :3 � cn al W 0^<CDCU ?� rnT• cr o rn'�Q CD O' = �. ::r �' CD 0 oo�c A �'='� 0- O (n CD o CD O Q O 01 O G� d CD (D 00crt::- g t0 C3' -i ? �CD01V) � CD to CD '=h a Cu Dl < o ::r � M'p�� 3 O in (D 0 n 0_ �p-w0� -s r:3r, 0 �D N1-oEo �O A a. C Op mp CrCD��W O � a� m �r-r-I �fD �< �0��.� c0 C(D <-,CDOWDv ��=. �'— U3 O =r m -r, n �OU3 �N r�y,'tf p Q. cn' N< CD c 2 CD CD 16J 2 n N 0- w - " (D Quo � n @ � 3 o c -� (D �. c�� CU- m o n 3 CD r* iw (D (CD 0 .a IW rat X d d. O O T O (D ? C o (D W O Nh �Er � =- — (D d o_ (rtD (D o_ �• co to cr (D =• =1 LO Cl_ v CL U2 U2 16J 27 ok s• lk (D a �r �� a�� M a � M 0 0) ( (D w � 3 o Cl. IV rD -v y rn N o, az n co m cr rV)—h �1 cu n 3 .a 16J 21 n 0 3 3 c 0 iGJ 24 n 0 3 3 c F---I C N m = fD = � = O O O �� O nN C i0�� C = C O N � o. 'o 0 v, =3 W 0 C 3 � N C N -P 0 O CL 0 O u7 W Vf '.�. c O O p O O CO O rD 'C (DD o C p 0 C o� 0 O �E M c n _ O C) W -� MM = � N A C � o Ul Ln 14 w C O. -"' 3 O • C) �oCO CO 0. r CD C) poC) -v o R cn � m ~ W N @ C ~ y CL Q O O O LO 110 p p O B O O b ? %� fD O OO O A cn' 0 iGJ 24 n 0 3 3 c F---I C N -1 0 a) =rg pr O Qo Ul 0Q� 3 � �. �(D Ul cu iw �o �o =r-" rD e-,. �=r =rD IW o- rn o' m r. CU =' rn m 16J 2 n 0 3 3 c CJ) CD 16J 2��!� n 0 3 3 c KO (!) C (!) N to-) Z On C C N co• fD -s O '' Q �-r o) =r of =�•o(D (i N � O '� 0 ca. n rt (D (D CD o rD (n_ • o N N r a o r•f• cn cn cr CA -0 :3 C W oprD3- noom n� O 3 �, .o .c C ( _ (D-0 p C� �- 0 3 m � c cr C �u'oo-3� 0 to 9 N= S0 C (D •� al am =r ' �-t CD 3 w o, can o d ono -ate •(nx ri n n 0 rn= o o' � � h x -� o r-r - CD-�co 3mrno <LaN• 5, CD- ,•��-� o fD rn°rn o• cr p fD M '�'*+ t�i� < N W fD CD C) O �, < o�rn rt� �- p DO n• cn ca. 4c r=-r � n• m (D •a 0-� (D (D , an �a) �� 0) h a n m 0- 16J 2��!� n 0 3 3 c a- vo o - O oc � ov ff. ID n0 NQ (InD rr 0 mm om < p r.rt't3 C(D O Ln � 0_ C:)-3 °3' -an7o rl"o CDDO- O�n on = 3 a 0_cn ,02. cr -a p 0. N� —(D rD a' C �, �• fDD cu O r.�. °.�, =:3 O 0 �0 -'m3 W En 'a 0: (!i �.� c0• } 0 0 rD c C) (D n °03 rr�' cop = rD 0_ • rD ° °,--', c S -00 rD OU rD rD n,N< 70 Varna" C ( :3m:3 0 o3��5- ? C � -v o W-n 0 3 �-,• o o, cn [D m r-r ? m r•r N F•-► .0_ - rD D•a n Ui, 0 0) ns Ln ui.c0 w m Q��Qrpp °�� N rD 0 0'� O � •o� � rD'O ��O°rDp�fl7�a 3� WD--a g� 0. rD ao o r to 45 � fl. O 0 E; 0- � rD S' ; n = oD o =rc to rD e-tto CD — n 3 rD P:V L0 5"M Qp- can) Rcu =OCrD vi =E- +— r*r�Dwa0_V M. M -°'v = voao °1 aD�� • 0. rD (n CA M �. rt r �w3cu03rrD�(D 0 •rD) r9a'C CL re -a _.r -rQ0 rD �;rD rD =r 0a.035•�'fD <op=3 -�+rry,COC rD 0_ 3 C (D-a rD un 3 c0 N' -h N rD cn rD -0 <_. r- r�nQO�CNC ET =r rD Ln r-r cn rt rD O G� cn- o m m '"` w E O wOMQLn(DDDJm t/) Q r-t = -s Cl. cn rD c0 . rD 0_ Cl. 16J 2 n 0 3 3 c I--I cD v `G 1 fD p' 1 C W - N 0 � N y m 7 T c c z 3 3 m 9 9 3 3 O1 N x y � O 7 N M` a CCD OD' -Ii 0. C7t'. A W. N'. -+ O f0 OD. r Co' CD Vi OA. CT A', W NI 1'v = Ir g 3 v v d ° m 3 O v v v� v, O �Zi m C N (�� L �? _ R. ; w D o3 D 3 d F d m m y m c v n A m e? O go pn D D) N y 'D T cO N = N y R � V V '9 00 a fD B; d �� i$9. 1. Er �� O) 0 a O T. D7 v �'.. -o Er W O 0 ON X07_ N O O m1 i 3iN a 3'N m W� 1 O 3'N m. o� I> 1 m' i co c m CD c 0 i3 N m W,c m ,3 N m (/� W fD 13':N m W M 13' N tll �m 3 N 'm W cg 3 N m l Wd ° 3w 5? -0 0 W3 N fA Cl) -4 'a -v U) I I cp ttN CIA43, NO) -4 03 cil b. C4 N (D W -4, 0) cil b" Lo 0 06) U) a (a <� lz EL 2L C-1 N > 31 8 a CD —! a loo- 5- 0 2 CL 0 5m* :53 S 1 F CD . ! 9 ? c 0 3 q :5. 0. ca- a a c z CL 5k cI c! = 1 CLI 9 1 I 1w, I Mi C5 m m ca cm �cal I C5 mi Iii M IN m CDI Al JC5 m OD iD M W! (:5 M, m CD Mf C5 16J 2 O =z -I> co m�� O O O ;r z z m rri z m cn :* N W Z mD G)D icD O D �m >m m� rn6 zm j� 0 z cnm 0m � � � r- rn (� o A =y gD m m o z OZ -+ OZ � o. cn cn cn o m mm rnm r, O - - - -- r rn m CL �OOD �z m 9m N ! o . �O (A -- z z moo m W cn m v iA z 0 rn z _ - -- - --� o �o W Z U) -• G") O O L, 0 0 m f 1 I s $g p y z O O n W < m o a� o �? RP m C) o # b� o Jx 16J 2 7 ' N a ...................... trill NYl7 94 m H m mom' a aca m i H 3.r a-u mm a -i a zm ci ° = M-0 ti r 2 .,.a•• N W < < < 1_ t Af I rmn P z z? ►-� co < 3. - d b H r N 'Y r 16J 2 16J 2 r 16J 2 y EXECUTIVE SUMMARY REQUEST THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVAL TO SPONSOR AN APPLICATION FOR TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS THROUGH THE MPO FOR FUNDING BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOR STREET LIGHTING ON U.S. 41 FROM GULF PARK DRIVE TO PINE RIDGE ROAD AND AUTHORIZATION FOR THE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE THE APPLICATION OBJECTIVE: For the Board of County Commissioners approval to sponsor an Application for Transportation Enhancement Projects through the MPO for funding by the State of Florida for street lighting on U.S. 41 from Gulf Park Drive to Pine Ridge Road and authorization for the Chairman to execute the Application. CONSIDERATIONS: This application is for the funding of street lighting on U.S. 41 from Gulf Park Drive to Pine Ridge Road. There is existing street lighting for three (3) miles north of the project and eleven (11) miles south of the project. The installation of this 1.4 mile project area will complete a fifteen (15) mile section of street lighting along U.S. 41. Staff requests that the Board of County Commissioners sponsor this application for submittal to the MPO for funding by the State of Florida for the proposed project. FISCAL IMPACT: None GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no Growth Management Impact resulting from this action. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners sponsor an Application For Transportation Enhancement Projects through the MPO for funding by the State of Florida for street lighting on U.S. 41 from Gulf Park Drive to Pine Ridge Road and af�i1rize the Cha�an to execute the Application. Submitted B . ��L -�'� Date: .3 /L ames P. Ward, Department Director Pelican Bay Services Division Reviewed By: Edward J. Kant, P.E., Director Transportation Operations Reviewed By: Norman Feder, AICP, Administrator Transportation Division Date: Date: AGENDA ITEM No. FEB 2 6 2002 P9 / 16J 2 State of Florida Department of Transportation APPLICATION FOR TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT PROJECTS Project Title: US41 Lighting - Gulf Park Drive - Seagate Drive Project Sponsor (municipal, county, state, or federal agency, or tribal council): Collier County Contact James P. Ward Title Department Director Pelican Bay Services Division Address 801 Laurel Oak Drive Suite 605 Na les FL 34108 Phone 941597-1749 Fax 941 -597 -4502 Priority (relative to other applications submitted by the Project Sponsor). Name of Applicant (If other than the Project Sponsor): 1. Qualifying Enhancement Activities: Check the enhancement activity which the proposed project will address. (Note: Checking all activities possible does not ensure or increase eligibility. Each activity checked must meet all criteria listed for that activity in Appendix A of FDOT Procedure #525 -030 -300, Transportation Enhancement Projects). X Provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicyclists. X Provision of safety and educational activities for pedestrian and bicyclists. Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites. Scenic or historic highway programs, (including the provision of tourist and welcome center facilities). Landscaping and other scenic beautification. Historic preservation. Rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings. structures or facilities (including historic railroad facilities and canals). Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the conservation and use thereof for pedestrian or or bicycle trails). Control and removal of outdoor advertising. Archaeological planning and research. Environmental mitigation to address water pollution due to high%vay runoff or reduce vehicle- caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity. AGENDA ITEM No. FEa262002 6J 24 Establishment of transportation museums 2. Project Description Use additional sheets as necessary to respond to the following: (a) What type of work is being performed? (check all that apply). Planning Activities Project Development and Environmental Studies X Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work Right of Way Acquisition X Construction X Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities (b) Describe how the proposed project relates to surface transportation such as by function, proximity or impact. (One or more may apply). This lighting project will work with the existing street lighting that is in place along US 41 both immediately north and south of the proposed lighting project. There is existing lighting for eleven (11) miles south of the project and over three (3) miles north of the project with only this one 1.4 mile section without lighting. If this project is completed there would be close to a fifteen (15) mile section of highway without interruption in the lighting. (c) Where is this project located (and what are the termini, if appropriate)? Include location map. This project is located on US 41 starting at Seagate Drive at the south end and Gulf Park Drive on the north end. (d) Summarize any special characteristics of project. Provide typical section drawings for appropriate projects. The proposed project is for typical street lighting as installed in the Six Laning project immediately to the north of this area. See the typical lighting section attached. (e) Describe the project's existing right of way acquisition, including expected matching fund source, limitations on fund use or availability, and who will acquire and retain ownership of proposed right of way. The property for the proposed project is located along US41 within existing Florida Department of Transportation right -of -way. (f) Describe any related project phases that are already complete or currently underway. The street lighting immediately to the north was just recently completed as part of the US 41 Six Laning Project. (g) Other specific project information that should be considered. FDOT is currently in the final stages of the six laning of US 41 immediately north of this proposed project that includes the installation of the street lighting for that project. With the completion of that project this leaves this 1.4 mile section of roadway that this request is for without lighting. 3. Project Implementation Information: Attach documentation as exhibits to this application. (a) Describe the proposed method of performing (i.e. contract or in — house) and administering (i.e. local or state) each work phase of the project. If it is proposed that the project be administered by a governmental entity other than the Department of Transportation, document that this entity has the fiscal, managerial, environmental and engineering capabilities to manage the work phase of the project consistent with federal requirements. It is proposed that this project would be constructed by a contractor. The design, bidding and construction would be administered and managed through the existing financial and management structure of Collier County Government. (b) Describe any public (and private, If applicable) support of the proposed project. (Examples include: written endorsement, formal declaration, resolution, financial donations or other appropriate means). (c) Describe the proposed ownership and maintenance responsibilities for the project when it is completed. The completed project would be part of the Florida Department of Transportation's roadway system anAWitrff4M No. FE8 2 6 200 16J 2 lighting would be maintained by Collier County per an agreement with the two government agencies for FDOT lighting within Collier County. (d) Describe source of matching funds and any restrictions on availability. N/A (e) Other specific implementation information that should be considered. This project provides for the completion of a continuous lighting system along US 41 from Broward Street for eleven miles north to Walkerbilt Road. 4. Project Cost: What is the estimated cost of the work requested to be funded as an enhancement project through this application? Planning Activities. Project Development and Environmental Studies. Engineering and Final Plans Preparation Work. Right of Way Acquisition. Construction. Construction Engineering and Inspection Activities. Other. (Describe) How will the project be funded? $ 23.850.00 $ 238.500.00 $ 11.925.00 Total: $ 274.275 FDOT Enhancement Funds $274,275.00 + Local $0.00 = Total $274,275.00 FDOT Enhancement Funds 100% + Local 0% = 100% CERTIFICATION OF PROJECT SPONSOR I hereby certify that the proposed project herein described is supported by (municipal, county, state or federal agency, or tribal council) and that said entity will: (1) provide any required funding match; (2) enter into a maintenance agreement with the Florida Department of Transportation; (3) comply with the Federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Acquisition Policies Act for any Right of Way actions required for the project, and (4) support other actions necessary to fully implement the proposed project. I further certify that the estimated costs included herein are reasonable and understand that significant increases in these costs could cause the project to be removed from the Florida Department of Transportation work program. AGENDA ITEM No. FEB 2 6 2002 16J 2 Signature James N t 1n1tz";; Name (please type or print) Chairman, Collier County Board Title of County CCITUdssioners Date FOR FDOT USE ONLY Application Complete Yes No Project Eligible Implementation Feasible Include in Work Program AGENDA ITEM No. FEB 2 6 2002 Pe '- t E s �a YY Y • sY 1 1 1 1 1 / v i 1 � I 1_ , 1 --- --- - - - - - -- 1 g• : g • • E w Iryorp-17 01 I•MIAV WW! o: � M/MMII IVO(IN OWIVgl1 • ` e e g p rz C� Q O z 3 O 9W 0. v ti Yv� a s, �e 2 9J i+ i 41 ills 1111 / -stt r ii= a sf W V •'` •� �O yYHE 8 � o � r HN.$ Asa. =lit �a a'a z _F4 / u4 i � s = r y p rz C� Q O z 3 O 9W 0. v ti Yv� a s, �e 2 9J i+ i 41 ills 1111 Q r W $ ., / e Ir °- W V •'` •� �O yYHE 8 o HN.$ Asa. =lit a'a s = a • Nr Q r W $ ., / e Ir W V •'` •� �O yYHE 8 o Q r W $ ., / e Ir W V °� Y z v b HN.$ � a'a Q r W $ ., 3 ¢ u ° Q r= w gf tE NL W V °� Y z v b HN.$ � a'a aE ¢�Ye O 2 C 3 w V 0 6J 12 AGENDA ITEM N0. ' E9 2 6 2002 G X j`A N I q rl i i 16J � I Ix Ix I Ic ' x I i in rn I� I I I � v I � I x . i I I I I I I � I F I I ONO ""` I I I I mcu. I ---------------- ---------------------- -- - - - - -- SEAGATE DRIVE I I PINE RIDGE ROAD A NSA ITEM I I N , II FEJ 2r�6 2002 V •4 16J � I Ix Ix I Ic ' x I i in rn I� I I I � v I � I x . i I I I I I I � I F I I ONO ""` I I I I mcu. I ---------------- ---------------------- -- - - - - -- SEAGATE DRIVE I I PINE RIDGE ROAD A NSA ITEM I I N , II FEJ 2r�6 2002 16J2 MAP OF: COLLLIER COUNTY STREETSCAPE BEAUTIFICATION PROJECT US41 (SR45) TAMIAMI TRAIL N. ON FILE IN THE CLERK TO THE BOARD MINUTES & RECORDS DEPARTMENT 4 Y ' ,.s r y. ■ �14V. n . - _ ` •rat' • f . ,. . _ a MR 1 $ 5 • .,.�'w .'yam Y.. '« `��i M 4 `,�.. A 4. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 41 !4 me 9 41 !4 me 16J2 MAP OF: PELICAN BAY US41 BUFFER NAPLES, FLORIDA SUGGESTED PLANTING SCHEMES ON FILE IN THE CLERK TO THE BOARD MINUTES & RECORDS DEPARTMENT 16J *1 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT A E VS13411"t 10*100M �. January 23, 2002 Mr. Raymond O'Connor Mr. John laizzo Pelican Bay Property Owners Association 801 Laurel Oak Drive Suite 600 Naples, Florida 34108 RE: Quality of Life Dear Messrs O'Connor and laizzo: 2 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE SUITE 605 NAPLES, FL 34108 (941) 597 -1749 FAX: (941) 597 -4502 I have received a copy of your letter to the Chairperson of the Pelican Bay Advisory Committee requesting the Committee's consideration on placing a moratorium on any activities on the US 41 Berm Landscaping Program. This item will be scheduled for discussion at the Pelican Bay Advisory Committee Meeting of February 6, 2002 at 3:00 P.M. and as the petitioner you will need to be present at that meeting in order to make such presentation as you deem appropriate to the Committee for its' consideration. If you plan on presenting any materials to the Advisory Committee and would like that information included in the back up material to the Board, please provide that material to our office not later than Wednesday, January 30, 2002 for inclusion in the agenda package, If you will be unable to attend the meeting please advise Mrs. Barbara Smith in my office at 597 -1749. Yours sincerely, ILCIAN BAY SqRVICES DIVISION ,pames P. Ward � Department Director PELICAN BAY PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC. 801 Laurel oaks nave Suite 600 Naples, Florida 34108 Phone (941) 566 - 9 6 2 Fax (941) 598 8-9485 85 J January 13, 2002 Lou Vlasho, Chairman MSTBU 6790 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naples, Florida 34108 Re: QUALITY of LIFE Pchcan Bay is not only paradise, it is "Heaven on Earth ", and 1 believe that the Community owners and residents share in that perception. Now, some 20 years from conception, the Community residents can attest to the phenomenal population growth here in Collier County and the increased traffic on six lanes of U.S. 41 highway. The PB Community residents along a 1.8 mile stretch, adjacent to the U.S. 41 highway/berm can attest to the 3 specific problems that impact their quality of life: 1) excessive carbon monoxide 2) heavy road traffic noise 3) open access (no security) to the Community property If these problems are allowed to continue, the future holds one of two certainties for the MSTBU board-, either pay an exorbitant price to correct these problems or see a drastic devaluation in their community property starting on the east end, neither of which are acceptable. The Advisory Board must not wait but must act now to preserve and protect not only the Community beautification but our "quality of life" as well. All 3 problems can be mitigated through careful planning using the U.S. 41 bemi as a "buffer zone", but first the Advisory Board must place a moratorium on the current landsca en Mprovement nowtl To restore a reasonable quality of life along this stretch of property, the "buffer zone" planning must include heavy vegetation. It is reasonable to assume that vegetation, if it is high enough, wide enough, and dense enough (can not see through or over) can reduce the aforementioned problems. It is imperative that a Contractor's request for bid must include the type of vegetation that will alleviate the problems along U.S. 41 highway. With this understanding, the PBPOA is willing to engage an expertlbotanist who could identify the proper combination of trees, shrubs and plants. 1 look forward to the Board's reply. y O'Connor President PBPOA c.c. MSTBU Board Members J� John Iaizzo Chairman Safety & Security Committee NYC Online Library: Highway I ratlic ivotse in the united Mates: 1'ronicm ana Kesponsc NPC Onlinc l.ibran . NPC I.aNN I.ibran NPC Noise NcN \s NPC Resources. NPC' I lonic HIGHWAY TRAFFIC NOISE IN THE UNITED STATES Problem and Response U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration TABLE OF CONTENTS ra�k�: 1 vi i-r 16J 2 PAGE NO. List of Tables INTRODUCTION 1 - Purpose: 1 - 11�e I Iiehn ac S�,tcnt � 1 -1 he Fcdcral/Slatc Relationship 2 federal Participation in the Cost of' Proiccis 2 I THREE -PART APPROACH TO HIGHWAY NOISE ABATEMENT 3 —1 I.and t use Planning, and Control 3 - Source Control 3 Ilq,h\Nav Projecl Noise Miti2alion 5 FHtiVA NOISE ABATEMENT PROCEDURES 6 - Noise Descriptors 6 Impact Criteria 6 laisting ActiN ities 8 1� pe V T} pc I1 Pro.jects 8 - Noise Auah sis 8 f, cdcral_ Participation 9 I Noise Abatement 9 Coordination with Local Officials � I 1 -1 raftic Noise Prediction 11 Construction Noise 11 NOISE BARRIERS CONSTRUCTED OR PLANNED 12 Noisc 13vriers C ogstructc;d —12 }:ffectiN eness 15 - Public_I'crccption 15 - ltescarcli ETForts 15 http:// www. nonoise. org/library/highway /probresp.htm 12/5/2001 NPC Online Library: Highway l rallic Noise in the unitea Mates: rrooiem anu icesponse St7MMAR1 FR Part Top NPC Online I.ibran NI?C LaAA_ Librat} NPC N is _NCAXS NPC Resources NPC 1 [oine for Abatement of Hip; NYC Online Library: Highwa} I raltic Noise in rile united Mates: rroniem ana icesponse Most (95 percent) roads and streets in the United States are under the jurisdiction of State and local governments. The Federal jur'sdiction is mainly limited to National Parks, National Forests, and other government -owned land. Generally in these areas, there are no permanent residents and, therefore, no noise problem of any extent. Ownership of the roads in the United States is shown in Table 1. Owner Federal State Local * Rounded to the nearest thousand 'lop NYC Onlinc I.ibran NPC LaNN Libran NPC Noise Nc%%s NPC Resources NYC I ionic Table 1 Road Ownership in the United States - 1994 Linear - Kilometers 292 1,333 4,883 16J 2 Percent of All Roads 20 75 The Federal -aid highway program is a federally assisted, State administered grant program which provides Federal funds to State and local governments to construct and improve highways. The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act of 1991 (ISTEA) set the course for future roles of federal, state, and local government in maintaining the country's highways, bridges, and mass transit facilities, and in strengthening highway safety programs. The ISTEA called for linking "...all forms of transportation in a unified, interconnected manner... economically efficient and environmentally sound ... [to] move people and goods in an energy efficient manner." The ISTEA restructured the Federal -aid highway program and established two Federal -aid systems - the National Highway System (NHS) and the Interstate System, which is a component of the NHS. The revised Federal -aid program includes about 1.6 million kilometers of the 6.5 million kilometers of roads in the United States. As can be seen in Table 2, urban roadways currently comprise a small portion of total roadways yet carry a large portion of all highway travel. Table 2 Classification of Roads by Functional System - 1994 * Rounded to nearest thousand The Federal /State Relations" The FHWA is the designated Federal government agency for administering the Federal -aid highway program. The FHWA mission is to aid States in providing safe and efficient surface transportation for the movement of people and goods by all modes. The FHWA is responsible for providing guidance to State highway agencies and metropolitan planning agencies (MPOs) and for reimbursing the States and MPOs for the Federal share of projects. The States, in cooperation with MPOs, initiate, plan, design, construct, operate, and maintain the highways on the Federal -aid systems. http:// www.nonoise.org/library/highway /probresp.htm 12/5/2001 Percent of Vehicle System Linear Kilometers * Percent of All Roads Kilometers Traveled Urban 1,355 20.8 61.5 Rural 5,153 79.2 38.5 TOTAL 6,508 100.0 100.0 * Rounded to nearest thousand The Federal /State Relations" The FHWA is the designated Federal government agency for administering the Federal -aid highway program. The FHWA mission is to aid States in providing safe and efficient surface transportation for the movement of people and goods by all modes. The FHWA is responsible for providing guidance to State highway agencies and metropolitan planning agencies (MPOs) and for reimbursing the States and MPOs for the Federal share of projects. The States, in cooperation with MPOs, initiate, plan, design, construct, operate, and maintain the highways on the Federal -aid systems. http:// www.nonoise.org/library/highway /probresp.htm 12/5/2001 NPC Online Library: Highway Traffic Noise in the United States: Problem and xesponse race 4 of i-+ Federal Participation in-the-Cost of Projects With a few exceptions, the FHWA does not pay for the entire cost of the projects it funds. Federal funds are - normally "matched" with State and/or local government funds to account for the necessary dollars to complete the project. The Federal share is specified in legislation. Interstate System projects are typically funded 90 percent Federal and 10 percent State, but most other types of projects are funded at a slightly lower Federal share (80 percent). -2- Top NI)C_Online 11bran NPC I_a%N 1. ibrin NPC Noise Nees NPC Re >our.;e_ s NPC Ilome THREE -PART APPROACH TO NOISE ABATEMENT 16J L Effective control of the undesirable effects of highway traffic noise requires that land use near highways be controlled, that vehicles themselves be quieted, and that mitigation of noise be undertaken on individual highway projects. The first component is traditionally an area of local responsibility. The other components are the joint responsibility of private industry and of Federal, state, and local governments. Land Use_Pl_annine and Control The Federal Government has essentially no authority to regulate land use planning or the land development process. The FHwA and other Federal agencies encourage state and local governments to practice land use planning and control in the vicinity of highways. The Federal Government advocates that local governments use their power to regulate land development in such a way that noise - sensitive land uses are either prohibited from being located adjacent to a highway, or that the developments are planned, designed, and constructed in such a way that noise impacts are minimized. Some state and local governments have enacted legislative statutes for land use planning and control. As an example, the state of California has legislation on highway noise and compatible land use development. This State legislation requires local governments to consider the adverse environmental effects of noise in their land development process. In addition, the law gives local governments broad powers to pass ordinances relating to the use of land, including among other things, the location, size, and use of buildings and open space. Although other States and local governments have similar laws, the entire issue of land use is extremely complicated with a vast array of competing considerations entering into any actual land use control decisions. For this reason, it is nearly impossible to measure the progress of using land use to control the effects of noise. Source Control The Noise control Act of 1972 gives the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to establish noise regulations to control major sources of noise, including transportation vehicles and construction equipment. In addition, this legislation requires EPA to issue noise emission standards for motor vehicles used in Interstate commerce (vehicles used to transport commodities across state boundaries) and requires the FHWA Office of Motor Carrier Safety (OMCS) to enforce these noise emission standards. -3- Top NPC Online Library NPC Law Library NPC Noisc News NPC Resources http:/ /www.nonoise.org/library/highway /probresp.htm 12/5/2001 NPC Online Library: Highway 1 raftic Noise in the united States: Problem and Response J V 1 ionic Pate �s 0 1-t The EPA has established regulations which set emission level standards for newly manufactured medium and heavy trucks that have a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) of more than 4,525 kilograms and are capable of operating on a highway or street. Table 3 shows the maximum noise emission levels allowed by the EPA noise regulations for these vehicles. 16J 2 Table 3 Maximum Noise Emission Levels as Required by EPA for Newly Manufactured Trucks with GVWR Over 4,525 Kilograms Effective Date Maximum Noise Level 15 Meters from Centerline of Travel* January 1, 1988 80 dBA * Using the Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc. (SAE), test procedure for acceleration under 56 kph For existing (in -use) medium and heavy trucks with a GVWR of more than 4,525 kilograms, the Federal government has authority to regulate the noise emission levels only for those that are engaged in interstate commerce. Regulation of all other in -use vehicles must be done by State or local governments. The EPA emission level standards for in -use medium and heavy trucks engaged in interstate commerce are shown in Table 4 and are enforced by the FHWA OMCS. Table 4 Maximum Noise Emission Levels as Required by EPA for In -Use Medium and Heavy Trucks with GVWR Over 4,525 Kilograms Engaged in Interstate Commerce -4- 'lop NPC Online Libran NYC LawLibra_n NPC Noise News_ N13C_Resour_c_e_s NYC home Highway Project Noise Mitigation The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 provides broad authority and responsibility for evaluating and mitigating adverse environmental effects including highway traffic noise. The NEPA directs the Federal government to use all practical means and measures to promote the general welfare and foster a healthy environment. A more important Federal legislation which specifically involves abatement of highway traffic noise is the Federal -Aid Highway Act of 1970. This law mandates FHWA to develop noise standards for mitigating highway traffic noise. The law requires promulgation of traffic noise -level criteria for various land use activities. The law further provides that FHWA not http:// www.nonoise.org/library/highway /probresp.htm 12/5/2001 Maximum Noise Level 15 Meters from Centerline Effective Date Speed of Travel January 8, 1986 < 56 kph 83 dBA January 8, 1986 > 56 kph 87 dBA January 8, 1986 Stationary 85 dBA -4- 'lop NPC Online Libran NYC LawLibra_n NPC Noise News_ N13C_Resour_c_e_s NYC home Highway Project Noise Mitigation The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969 provides broad authority and responsibility for evaluating and mitigating adverse environmental effects including highway traffic noise. The NEPA directs the Federal government to use all practical means and measures to promote the general welfare and foster a healthy environment. A more important Federal legislation which specifically involves abatement of highway traffic noise is the Federal -Aid Highway Act of 1970. This law mandates FHWA to develop noise standards for mitigating highway traffic noise. The law requires promulgation of traffic noise -level criteria for various land use activities. The law further provides that FHWA not http:// www.nonoise.org/library/highway /probresp.htm 12/5/2001 LV rL vnniic Ll ui aly - 111611 WUy 11u111%, 1\v1J\. 111 Lit, vaaa a..0 Ulul..J. a avva. ua au . 11 ... . approve the plans and specifications for a federally aided highway project unless the project includes adequate noise abatement measures to comply with the standards. The FHWA has developed and implemented regulations for the mitigation of highway traffic noise in federally -aided highway projects. The FHWA regulations for mitigation of highway traffic noise in the planning and design of federally aided highways are contained in Title 23 of the United States Code of Federal Regulations Part 772 OttaghO). The regulations require the following during the planning and design of a highway project: identification of traffic noise impacts; examination of potential mitigation measures; the incorporation of reasonable and feasible noise mitigation measures into the highway project; and coordination with local officials to provide helpful information on compatible land use planning and control. The regulations contain noise abatement criteria which represent the upper limit of acceptable highway traffic noise for different types of land uses and human activities. The regulations do not require that the abatement criteria be met in every instance. Rather, they require that every reasonable and feasible effort be made to provide noise mitigation when the criteria are approached or exceeded. Compliance with the noise regulations is a prerequisite for the granting of Federal -aid highway funds for construction or reconstruction of a highway. -5- lop NPC Online Libras NPC L.aN� I.ihran NYC _Noise Ne-vi's NPC Resources MC Ilomc FHWA Noise Abatement Procedures The FHWA noise abatement procedures are codified in the code of Federal Regulations (23 CFR 772). The procedures are described in the following sections. Noise Descriptors Noise descriptors are used to describe the time - varying nature of noise. The L10 and Leq noise descriptors are used in the abatement procedures. The former is the noise level exceeded 10% of the time in the noisiest hour of the day. The latter is the constant, average sound level, which over a period of time contains the same amount of sound energy as the varying levels of the traffic noise. The L 10 is a statistical descriptor that is easy for most people to determine and understand. While the Leq descriptor is harder for inexperienced people to understand, it has the advantages over L 10 of being more reliable for low - volume roadways and of permitting noise levels from different sources to be added directly to one another for inclusion in noise analyses. Leq for typical traffic conditions is usually about 3 dBA less than L10 for the same conditions. Impact criteria A noise impact occurs when either of the following conditions exist: (1) The projected noise levels approach or exceed the noise abatement criteria (NAC) shown in Table 5, or (2) The projected noise levels substantially increase over the existing noise levels in an area. -6- lop NPC Online Library- NPC Law Libran, NPC Noise News NPC Resources NPC Home htt p:/ /www.nonoise.org/library/highway /probresp.htm 12/5/2001 1Vrl, unii e LlDrui) a) i jai Ik- ivvi�c i]I ui- U III Ll.0 Okw_z,. i ivui�.ILL auu Table 5 * Either L 10(h) or Leq(h) (but not both) may be used on a project. -7- I op NPC (hiline Libran Nl'C La. Libyan NPC Noise News NPC Resources NPC home There is no mandated definition for what constitutes a substantial increase over existing noise levels in an area. Most State highway agencies use either a 10 dBA increase or a 15 dBA increase in noise levels to define a "substantial increase" in existing noise levels. Several State highway agencies use a sliding scale to define substantial increase. The sliding scale combines the increase in noise levels with the absolute values of the noise levels, allowing for a greater increase at lower absolute levels before a substantial increase occurs. Existing AActivRies The location of existing activities in the vicinity of various study alternatives for a highway project are identified by individual land uses, or by broad categories of land use for which a single NAC level may apply. In some cases, lands that are undeveloped at the time of the project may be known to be under consideration for development in the future. If this is the case and definite commitments have been made to develop the land, then these lands are treated as developed and the highway noise impacts assessed accordingly. Primary consideration for highway traffic noise analysis is normally given to exterior areas where frequent human use occurs. Type I/ Type II Projects The FHWA regulation makes a distinction between projects for which noise abatement is considered as a feature in a new or expanded highway and those for which noise abatement is considered as a retrofit feature on an existing highway. The former are defined as Type I projects, the latter as Type II. For Type I projects, the consideration of noise abatement as part of the highway construction project is mandatory if Federal -aid funds are to be used and if a traffic noise impact is expected to occur. Type II projects are, however, completely voluntary on the part of the individual states, and funds for such projects compete with all the other construction needs of the States. It should be noted that the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995 (NHS) restricted Federal participation in Type II noise barriers to those projects that were approved before November 28, 1995 or are proposed along lands http: / /www.nonoise. org/library/highway /probresp.htm 12/5/2001 Noise Abatement Criteria (NAC) 16J 2 Hourly A- Weighted Sound Level - decibels (dBA)* Activity_ Category Leq(h) L10(h) Description of Activity Category Lands on which serenity and quiet are of extraordinary significance and serve an A 57 60 important public need and where the (Exterior) (Exterior) preservation of those qualities is essential if the area is to continue to serve its intended purpose. Picnic area, recreation areas, 67 70 playgrounds, active sports areas, parks, B (Exterior) (Exterior) residences, motels, hotels, schools, churches, libraries, and hospitals. C 72 75 Developed lands, properties, or activities (Exterior) (Exterior) not included in Categories A or B above. D -- -- Undeveloped lands. 52 55 Residences, motels, hotels, public E (Interior) (Interior) meeting rooms, schools, churches libraries, hospitals, and auditoriums. * Either L 10(h) or Leq(h) (but not both) may be used on a project. -7- I op NPC (hiline Libran Nl'C La. Libyan NPC Noise News NPC Resources NPC home There is no mandated definition for what constitutes a substantial increase over existing noise levels in an area. Most State highway agencies use either a 10 dBA increase or a 15 dBA increase in noise levels to define a "substantial increase" in existing noise levels. Several State highway agencies use a sliding scale to define substantial increase. The sliding scale combines the increase in noise levels with the absolute values of the noise levels, allowing for a greater increase at lower absolute levels before a substantial increase occurs. Existing AActivRies The location of existing activities in the vicinity of various study alternatives for a highway project are identified by individual land uses, or by broad categories of land use for which a single NAC level may apply. In some cases, lands that are undeveloped at the time of the project may be known to be under consideration for development in the future. If this is the case and definite commitments have been made to develop the land, then these lands are treated as developed and the highway noise impacts assessed accordingly. Primary consideration for highway traffic noise analysis is normally given to exterior areas where frequent human use occurs. Type I/ Type II Projects The FHWA regulation makes a distinction between projects for which noise abatement is considered as a feature in a new or expanded highway and those for which noise abatement is considered as a retrofit feature on an existing highway. The former are defined as Type I projects, the latter as Type II. For Type I projects, the consideration of noise abatement as part of the highway construction project is mandatory if Federal -aid funds are to be used and if a traffic noise impact is expected to occur. Type II projects are, however, completely voluntary on the part of the individual states, and funds for such projects compete with all the other construction needs of the States. It should be noted that the National Highway System Designation Act of 1995 (NHS) restricted Federal participation in Type II noise barriers to those projects that were approved before November 28, 1995 or are proposed along lands http: / /www.nonoise. org/library/highway /probresp.htm 12/5/2001 i,wt_ Vnline L luary.- Illg'llw[ly' 11Qllll; 1VV16G 111 UA, 1J1111k,u OLULu_ ,'. 1 1%UDD11L {Allis 1uof,vuo� where land development or substantial construction predated the existence of any highway. 16J Noise An sis 2 Analysis of the traffic noise impacts expected from construction of a highway involves a number of technical steps. The traffic noise analysis includes the following for each alternative under detailed study: (1) identification of existing activities, developed lands, and undeveloped lands for which development is planned, designed and programmed, which may be affected by traffic noise from the highway; (2) prediction of traffic noise levels; (3) determination of existing noise levels; -8- lop NPC Onlinc Librarn NPC I,MN Libran NIT Noise New s NIT-Re-sources NYC Home (4) determination of traffic noise impacts; and (5) examination and evaluation of alternative noise abatement measures for reducing or eliminating the noise impacts. If potential traffic noise impacts are identified, noise abatement is considered and implemented if it is found to be both reasonable and feasible. The views of the impacted residents are a major consideration in reaching a decision on the reasonableness of abatement measures to be provided. When noise abatement measures are being considered, every reasonable effort is made to obtain substantial noise reductions, substantial noise reductions have been defined by state highway agencies to typically range from 5 to 10 dBA. Federal Participation Federal funds may be used for noise abatement measures where: (1) a traffic noise impact has been identified, (2) the noise abatement measures will reduce the traffic noise impact, and (3) the overall noise abatement benefits are determined to outweigh the overall adverse social, economic, and environmental effects and the costs of the noise abatement measures. The Federal share of the abatement costs is at the same participating ratio as for the system on which the project is located. Noise Abatement If noise impacts are identified, various noise abatement measures are considered to mitigate the adverse impacts. Noise barriers are the mitigation measure that is most often associated with the concept of noise abatement. For this reason a special section on noise barr iers, which begins on page 12, has been included in this report to discuss this subject in more detail. Other possible noise abatement measures include traffic management measures, creating buffer zones, planting vegetation, installing I noise insulation in buildings, and relocating the highway. J Traffic management measures can sometimes reduce noise problems. For example, if acceptable alternative truck routes are available, trucks can be prohibited from certain streets and roads, or they can be permitted to use certain streets and roads only during daylight http: / /www.nonoise .org/library/highway /probresp.htm 12/5/2001 NP(_ Unllne Liorar)'. tii�tiwa� 1railiG ivui�c to UIC vuiLcu IWU:'�. < LOUILii, AliU hours. Traffic lights can be changed to smooth out the flow of traffic and to eliminate the need for frequent stops and starts. Speed 'limits can be reduced; however, about a 32 kilometer - per -hour reduction in speed is necessary for a noticeable decrease in noise levels. 92 lop NI'C Online Libra- NI'C La�� l.ibran NPC Noise New .s NPC Resources NPC I Ionic 16J L Buffer zones are undeveloped, open spaces which border a highway. Buffer zones are created when a highway agency purchases land, or development rights, in addition to the normal right -of -way, so that future dwellings cannot be constructed close to the highway. This prevents the possibility of constructing dwellings that would otherwise experience an excessive noise level from nearby highway traffic. An additional benefit of buffer zones is that they often improve the roadside appearance. However, because of the tremendous amount of land that must be purchased and because in many cases dwellings already border existing roads, creating buffer zones is often not possible. Although Federal -aid highway funds may be used on a highway project to create buffer zones, this measure has not been used very often. Vegetation, if it is high enough, wide enough, and dense enough that it cannot be seen over or through, can decrease highway traffic noise. A 61 -meter width of dense vegetation can reduce noise by 10 decibels, which cuts in half the loudness of traffic noise. It is not feasible, however, to plant enough vegetation along a road to achieve such reductions. If vegetation already exists, it can be saved to maintain a psychological relief, if not an actual lessening of traffic noise levels. If vegetation does not exist, it can be planted for psychological relief. Insulating buildings can greatly reduce highway traffic noise, especially when windows are sealed and cracks and other openings are filled. Sometimes noise - absorbing material can be placed in the walls of new buildings during construction. However, insulation can be costly because air conditioning is usually necessary once the windows are sealed. Federal -aid highway funds may be used for noise insulation of public -use or non - profit institutional structures, such funds may also be used for noise insulation of residences and other private -use buildings where noise impacts are especially severe, and where no other abatement is possible. Very few private -use buildings have been noise insulated with Federal -aid highway funds. The majority of Federal -aid highway funds used for noise insulation has been spent to noise insulate schools. In many parts of the country, highway agencies do not have the authority to insulate buildings; thus, in those states insulation cannot be included as part of a highway project. A noise attenuation measure that should always be considered is the possibility of altering the highway location to avoid those land use areas which have been determined to have a potential noise impact. Since sound intensity decays with distance from the source, increased distance between the noise source and receiver may reduce the noise impact. It may also be possible to obtain attenuation by depressing the roadway slightly to produce a break in the line of sight from the source to the receiver. Potential noise reduction should be considered with the many other factors that influence the selection of roadway alignment. Since there are very few new highways being built in the United States, the choice of changing the alignment or depressing the roadway is usually not available. -10- Top NPC Online Libran, NPC Law Libran� NPC Noise News NPC Resources NPC Home Coordination With Local Officials The FHWA noise regulation requires coordination with local officials whose jurisdictions are affected. The primary purpose of this coordination is to promote compatibility between land development and highways. http:// www.nonoise.org /library/highway /probresp.htm 12/5/2001 NFC Unline Library: t-itgnway tratnc mise m the unttea Mates: rromem ana xesponse rage 1U of 14 Highway agencies furnish the following information to appropriate local officials: (1) Estimated future traffic noise levels at various distances from the highway improvement. 16J 2 (2) Locations where local communities should protect future land development from becoming incompatible with anticipated highway traffic noise levels. Traffic Noise Prediction The FHWA has developed a model to accurately predict future highway traffic noise levels. State highway agencies either use the FHWA model for highway traffic noise analysis or a model based upon the same methodology as that contained in the FHWA model. The FHWA has also developed national averages of vehicle emission levels to be used in the FHWA prediction model. State highway agencies either use the national average levels or measure their own levels based upon FHWA measurement procedures. Construction Noise Highway construction noise is not a major issue in the United States. This noise is often viewed by the public as being short term and a necessary price for growth and improvement. Highway construction noise should generally be addressed in a qualitative rather than quantitative manner that is commensurate with the scope of the highway project. Construction noise levels may be predicted, if warranted. If potential construction noise impacts are identified, a common sense approach should be utilized to incorporate appropriate abatement measures into the highway project. Top NPC Online Libran NYC Law Libran NPC Noise News NPC Resources NPC Home NOISE BARRIERS CONSTRUCTED OR PLANNED Noise barriers are solid obstructions built between the highway and the homes along the highway. Effective noise barriers can reduce noise levels by ten to fifteen decibels, cutting the loudness of traffic noise in half. Barriers can be formed from earth mounds along the road (usually called earth berms) or from high, vertical walls. Earth berms have a very natural appearance and are usually attractive. However, an earth berm can require quite a lot of land if it is very high. Walls take less space. They are usually limited to eight meters in height because of structural and aesthetic reasons. Noise walls can be built out of wood, stucco, concrete, masonry, metal, and other materials. Many attempts are being made to construct noise barriers that are visually pleasing and that blend with their surroundings. Noise Barriers Constructed The Federal -aid highway program has always been based on a strong State - Federal partnership. At the core of that partnership is a philosophy of trust and flexibility, and a belief that the States are in the best position to make investment decisions that are based on the needs and priorities of their citizens. The FHWA noise regulations give each SHA flexibility in determining the reasonableness and feasibility of noise abatement and, thus, in balancing the benefits of noise abatement against the overall adverse social, economic, and environmental effects and costs of the noise abatement measures. The SHA must base its determination on the interest of the overall public good, keeping in mind all the elements of the highway program (need, funding, environmental impacts, public involvement, etc.). Congress affirmed and extended the philosophy of partnership, trust, and flexibility in the enactment of ISTEA. The flexibility in noise abatement decisionmaking is reflected by data indicating that some States have built many noise barriers and some have built none. Through the end of 1995, forty-one state highway agencies (SHAs) and the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico have constructed over 2,120 linear kilometers of barriers at a cost of over $1.2 billion ($1.4 billion in 1995 dollars). Nine states and the District of Columbia have not constructed noise barriers to date. Table 6 lists the ten states that have constructed the most noise barriers, in terms of area, length, and cost. The cost data in Table 6 give a general indication of trends. However, the data should not http: / /www.nonoise .org/library/highway /probresp.htm 12/5/2001 NYC; Unitne Li0rary: Hignway 1 rank iNoise in the unttea Mates: rromem anu tcesponse rage i i of i-+ be used for exact comparisons, since precise, uniform individual barrier costs are very difficult to obtain. Table 7 shows total noise barrier areas by material type. Table 8 lists the nine states that have not constructed noise barriers to date. _12_ 16J 2 fop NPC Online Lihrar% NYC' La�� 1_ibran NPC• Noisy NcR s NPC Resources NPC 1 lomc Table 6 Noise Barrier Construction By State Through 1995 -13- Top NPC Online Libran NPC Laic Libran' NPC Noise N_ew_s NPC Resources NPC Home http:/ /www.nonoise.org /library/highway /probresp.htm 12/5/2001 Square Meters Linear (Thousands) Kilometers California 2529 California 701.0 New Jersey 652 Virginia 116.8 Virginia 598 New Jersey 113.9 Minnesota 476 Minnesota 99.0 New York 391 Colorado 92.4 Maryland 298 New York 90.0 Pennsylvania 291 Pennsylvania 75.2 Colorado 284 Washington 71.9 Connecticut 254 Oregon 70.2 Ohio 253 Michigan 62.6 10 State Total 6,026 1,493.0 Actual Cost 1995 Dollars (Millions) (Millions) California $368.5 California $438.7 New Jersey 141.2 New Jersey 163.9 Virginia 88.7 Virginia 106.0 Maryland 78.1 Maryland 89.6 New York 69.0 New York 78.5 Pennsylvania 66.4 Pennsylvania 76.8 Michigan 41.9 Minnesota 58.3 Florida 38.9 Michigan 52.0 Minnesota 37.3 Floroda 44.4 Wisconsin 37.3 Wisconsin 43.2 10 State Total $967.3 $1,151.4 -13- Top NPC Online Libran NPC Laic Libran' NPC Noise N_ew_s NPC Resources NPC Home http:/ /www.nonoise.org /library/highway /probresp.htm 12/5/2001 NYC.' online Library: Hignway traittc iNoise in the Untteu 3tateS: rruulCtil WILL ru�;C- I- vi I-t Table 7 16J 2 Total Noise Barrier Area by Material Type Through 1995 Single Material Barriers Combination Barriers Material Square Meters Material Square Meters - -- - - fThousands (Thousands) Concrete/Precast 2884 Berm /Wood 278 Block 2402 Berm /Concrete 172 Wood/Post &Plank 464 Wood/Concrete 152 Concrete/Unspecified 391 Berm /Metal 133 Berm Only 298 Concrete/Block 94 Wood/Unspecified 289 Metal /Concrete 87 Wood/Glue Laminated 236 Concrete /Brick 72 Metal/Unspecified 233 Berm/Block 52 Brick 94 W ood/Metal 43 Other 81 Berm/Wood/Concrete 27 Wood/Block 26 Berm /Wood /Metla 16 Other 80 Total 7,372 Total 1,232 Alabama Hawaii -14- Top N11'C Online Library NPC Law Librar%, NPC Noise News NPC Resources NPC Horne Effectiveness Table 8 States That Have Not Constructed Noise Barriers to Date Idaho Montana Mississippi North Dakota Rhode Island South Dakota Wyoming Noise barriers can be quite effective in reducing noise for receptors within approximately 61 meters of a highway. Table 9 summarizes barrier attenuation. Reduction in Sound Level 5 dBA Table 9 Barrier Attenuation Reduction in Acoustic Enersy 70% Degree of Difficulty To Obtain Reduction Simple http: / /www.nonoise .org/library/highway /probresp.htrn 12/5/2001 NFU unline Limary: rnlgnway 1ra111C 11401SC III L11C U111LCU JLa ICS: C1UU1C111 allu JXCNP0115C I a- 1J lJl -f 10 dBA 90% Attainable 15 dBA 97% Very Difficult 20 dBA 99% Nearly Impossible Barriers do have limitations. For a noise barrier to work, it must be high enough and long enough to block the view of a road. Noise barriers do very little good for homes on a hillside overlooking a road or for buildings which rise above the barrier. Openings in noise walls for driveway connections or intersecting streets greatly reduce the effectiveness of barriers. In some areas, homes are scattered too far apart to permit noise barriers to be built at a reasonable cost. Public Perception Overall, public reaction to highway noise barriers appears to be positive. There is, however, a wide diversity of specific reactions to barriers. Residents adjacent to barriers have stated that conversations in households are easier, sleeping conditions are better, a more relaxing environment is created, windows are opened more often, and yards are used more in the summer. Perceived non -noise benefits include increased privacy, cleaner air, improved view and sense of ruralness, and healthier lawns and shrubs. Negative reactions have included a restriction of view, a feeling of confinement, a loss of air circulation, a loss of sunlight and lighting, and poor maintenance of the barrier. Host residents near a barrier seem to feel that barriers effectively reduce traffic noise and that the benefits of barriers outweigh the disadvantages of the barriers. Research Efforts Over the last two decades, much work has been done within the highway program to develop the basic tools necessary to analyze the impacts of highway traffic noise. Efforts have focused on the establishment of criteria for considering highway traffic noise, the measurement and prediction of noise levels, and the development and evaluation of feasible measures to abate highway traffic noise. Today, research efforts are continuing to assure that analysis tools reflect the current state -of -the -art in highway traffic noise, while meeting the program needs of State highway agencies. -15- Top NPC Online LibrarN NPC Law Libran- NPC Noise News NPC Resources NPC Home Highway traffic noise research has been guided and continues to be guided by representatives of State highway agencies, other State government agencies, local government agencies, Federal agencies, and the academic and private sectors. An important part of this cooperative effort is the work of the Transportation Research Board Committee on Transportation- Related Noise and Vibration, which has been instrumental in identifying and prioritizing research needs. Another important part of this effort is the research work that individual states conduct within their own highway programs. Future research efforts will strive to produce more cost effective solutions and efficient allocation of resources to deal with the problems of highway traffic noise. Emphasis is anticipated in the areas of traffic noise prediction and abatement analysis. AIM,iu /:\:i11 The United States has undertaken a program which utilizes a three -part approach to the abatement of highway traffic noise. Noise - compatible development through effective land use planning and control is traditionally an area of local responsibility. Source control or control of noise emissions from the vehicles themselves is a joint responsibility of private industry and of Federal, State, and local governments. The FHWA has established noise standards for different types of land use activities adjacent to highways. These standards require that for certain types of federally -aided highway projects, States must conduct noise analyses to identify potential highway traffic noise impacts. If impacts are identified, noise abatement measures must be considered and implemented if determined to be both reasonable and feasible. Among the various types of possible abatement measures, the construction of noise barriers is most commonly used. -16- http:// www. nonoise .org/library/highway /probresp.htm 12/5/2001 Page 1 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION 16J CLAM BAY RESTORATION FUND DECEMBER 31, 2001 F.Y.'s 97 -99 F.Y. 2000 F.Y. 2001 F.Y. 2002 Total Exp. Dec. 2001 Actual Budget Budget Budget Budget To Date Balance Expenses EXPENDITURES Environmental Consult. Engineering Fees $0 $0 $58,040 $174,653 $232,693 $58,040 $174,653 $0 Akerman, Senterfitt, et. al. $207,683 $0 $0 $0 $207,683 $207,683 $0 $0 Lewis Environmental Serv. $78,732 $0 $0 $0 $78,732 $78,732 $0 $0 Tackney & Associates $86,500 $0 $0 $0 $86,500 $86,500 $0 $0 Wilson, Miller, et. al. $67,675 $1,522 $7,245 $0 $76,442 $76,442 $0 $0 Dr. Samuel Snedeker $9,997 $0 $0 $0 $9,997 $9,997 $0 $0 Hilburn Hilstad $10,550 $0 $0 $0 $10,550 $10.550 $0 $0 Turrell $49,238 $12,701 $4,562 $0 $66,500 $66,500 $0 $0 Other Expenditures $41.009 $39,472 $146,324 $188,700 $415,505 $227,824 $187,680 $0 Sub -Total $551,384 $53,695 $216,170 $363,353 $1,184,603 $822,268 $362,334 $0 Tidal Creeks 1,2 & 3 Engineering Construction Tackney $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Turrell $57,101 $1,899 $0 $0 $59,000 $59,000 $0 $0 Agnoli, Barber & Brundage $2,796 $0 $0 $0 $2,796 $2,796 $0 $0 Engineering Design Tackney $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Turrell $26,790 $0 $0 $0 $26,790 $26.790 $0 $0 Agnoli, Barber& Brundage $11.596 $0 $0 $0 $11,596 $11.596 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $134.830 $51.183 $0 $0 $186,013 $186,013 $0 $0 Sub -Total $233,113 $53,082 $0 $0 $286,195 $286,195 $0 $0 Clam Pass Main Channel Engineering Construction Tackney $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Turrell $74,291 $4,709 $0 $0 $79,000 $79,000 $0 $0 Agnoli, Barber & Brundage $5,900 $0 $0 $0 $5,900 $5.900 $0 $0 Engineering Design Tackney $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Turrell $24,980 $0 $0 $0 $24,980 $24,980 $0 $0 Agnoli, Barber & Brundage $10.000 $0 $0 $0 $10,000 $10.000 $0 $0 Snedaker $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $251.530 $0 $0 $0 $251,530 $251.530 $0 $0 Sub -Total $ 366 ,701 $4,709 $0 $0 $371,410 $371,410 $0 $0 Interior Tidal Creeks Engineering Construction WMB &P $0 $10.990 $0 $0 $1 0,990 $10.990 $0 $0 Turrell $1,503 $1,497 $0 $0 $3,000 $3.000 $0 $0 Interior Tidal Creeks Engineering Design Lewis Environmental $17,450 $14,350 $0 $0 $31.800 $31.800 $0 $0 WMB &P $5.804 $6,816 $0 $0 $12.620 $12.620 $0 $0 Engineering Consultants Lewis Environmental $27,409 $59,110 $27,692 $0 $114,211 $114.211 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $25.500 $47,478 $47,398 $0 $120,376 $120.376 $0 $0 Sub -Total $77,666 $140,241 $75,090 $0 $292,997 $292,997 $0 $0 Page 1 Ecosystem Enhancements Environmental Consultants $0 PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION $0 $110,700 $114,450 I $110.700 $0 CLAM BAY RESTORATION FUND $0 16J 2 $262,600 $287,798 $38,948 DECEMBER 31, 2001 $1 3,750 Capital Improvements $0 $0 $8,250 F.Y.'s 97 -99 F.Y. 2000 F.Y. 2001 F.Y. 2002 Total Exp. $0 Dec. 2001 $0 Actual Budget Budget Budget Budget To Date Balance Expenses EXPENDITURES $13,750 Operating Supplies $0 $0 $0 $0 Seagate Culverts $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $0 Engineering Construction $6,624 $45,441 $38,817 $6.624 $0 Sub -Total WMB &P $0 $8,071 $0 $0 $8,071 $8,071 $0 SO Engineering Design Capital Outlay WMB &P $9,108 $3,277 $0 $0 $12,385 $12,385 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $88,240 $0 $0 $88,240 $88,240 $0 $0 Sub -Total $9,108 $99,588 $0 $0 $108,696 $108,696 $0 $0 Ecosystem Enhancements Environmental Consultants $0 $3,750 $0 $110,700 $114,450 $3,750 $110.700 $0 Other Contractual Serv. $0 $0 $25,198 $262,600 $287,798 $38,948 $248,850 $1 3,750 Capital Improvements $0 $0 $8,250 $0 $8,250 $8,250 $0 $0 Sub -Total $0 $3,750 $33,448 $373,300 $410,498 $50,948 $359,550 $13,750 Fresh/Stormwater Analysis Engineering Fees $0 $0 $16,980 $3,020 $20,000 $16,980 $0 $0 Environmental Consult. Fees $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Turrell & Associates $26,455 $56,045 $0 $0 $82,500 $82,500 $0 $0 Other Contractual Serv. $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Operating Supplies $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 Capital Improvements $0 $0 $38,817 $6,624 $45,441 $38,817 $6.624 $0 Sub -Total $26,455 $56,045 $55,797 $9,644 $147,941 $138,297 $9,644 $0 Capital Outlay Improvements General $15,459 $0 $950 $0 $16,409 $16,409 $0 $0 Other Machinery & Equip. $4,727 $13.986 $0 $0 $18,713 $18.713 $0 $0 Sub -Total $20,186 $13,986 $950 $0 $35,122 $35,122 $0 $0 Other Fees & Charges Tax Collector $23,041 $0 $0 $1,300 $24,341 $23,090 $1,251 $49 Property Appraiser $8,637 $0 $0 $1,900 $10,537 $8,637 $1,900 $0 Revenue Reserve $0 $0 $0 $3,400 $3,400 $0 $3.400 $0 Sub -Total $31,678 $0 $0 $6,600 $38,278 $31,727 $6,551 $0 TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS $1,316,291 $425,096 $381,454 $752,897 $2,875,739 $2,137,661 $738,078 $13,750 Rolled Encumbrances which are included in Total Approp. $95,797 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE DATE INV. NO. AMOUNT Turrell & Associates 10/22/01 10 -22 -01 $15,122.04 Turrell & Associates 12/15/01 1 $39,655.37 Turrell & Associates 10/22/01 2 $20,398.12 TOTAL INVOICES $75,175.53 NOTE: WCI THRU 12/31/01 WCI: BILLED TO DATE WCI: PAID TO DATE $955,425.40 $955,425.40 Page 2 COLLIER COUNTY PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION 16J 2 STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THREE (3) MONTHS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2001 Revenue Interest Income Plan Review Fee Income Interfund Transfers Miscellaneous Income Assessment or Ad- Valorem Tax Levy Unappropriated Fund Balance Total Revenue Other Fees & Charges Property Appraiser Tax Collector Revenue Reserve Total Other Fees & Charges NET REVENUE Appropriations - Personal Services Personal Services - Admin. Personal Services - Field Total Personal Services Appropriations - Operations Administration Indirect Cost Reimbursements Other Contractual Services Telephone - Service Contracts Telephone - Direct Line Postage, Freight & Ups Rent - Buildings Rent - Equipment Lease Purchase Dell Computers Insurance - General Data Processing - R &M Printing or Binding - Outside Vendors Clerks Recording Fees, Etc. Legal Advertising Office Supplies - General Copying Charges Minor Office Equipment Computer Software Other Training & Educational Exp. Other Operating Supplies Total Administration Field Services Engineering & Consultants Berm & Swale Maintenance Water Quality Testing Plan Review Services Water Use Charges Replanting Program Other Contractual Services GENERAL FUNDS Prorated Water Community Street Total Rev/Eap F.Y. 2002 Dec -01 Favorable Management Beautification Lights Security Thru Dec. Budget Budget Unfavorable $1,589 $14,288 $3,868 $2,376 $22,121 $60,400 $15,100 $7,021 $100 $0 $0 $0 $100 $5,000 $1,250 ($1,150) $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $o $0 $0 $0 $o $o $447,961 $1,132,993 $172,215 $309,639 $2,062,807 $2,536,900 $2,054,889 $7,918 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $264,351 $0 $0 $449,650 $1,147,281 $176,082 $312,015 $2,085,028 $2,866,651 $2,071,239 $13,789 $0 $0 $736 $1,322 $2,058 $50,700 $2,058 $0 $7,153 $18,587 $6,259 $11,282 $43,282 $74,600 $43,282 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $144,200 $0 $0 $7,153 $18,587 $6,995 $12,604 $45,339 $269,500 $45,339 $0 $442,497 $1,128,694 $169,088 $299,411 $2,039,689 $2,597,151 $2,025,900 $13.789 $9,411 $9,536 $9,061 n/a $28,008 $120,000 $30,000 $1,992 $28,366 $137,331 $6,287 n/a $171,984 $954,000 $238,500 $66,516 $37,776 $146,867 $15,348 $0 $199,992 $1,074,000 $268,500 568,508 $143,000 $0 $10,500 n/a $153,500 $153,500 $153,500 $0 $6,089 $7.824 $3,960 n/a $17,873 $69,000 $17,250 ($623) $96 $96 $72 n/a $264 $2,000 $500 $236 $871 $871 $548 n/a $2,289 $7,000 $1,750 ($539) $259 $234 $165 n/a $658 $13,000 $3,250 $2,592 $2,576 $2,654 $2,576 n/a $7,805 $23,900 $5,975 ($1,830) $170 $170 $170 n/a $511 $3,900 $975 $464 $278 $0 $0 n/a $278 $1,100 $275 ($3) $4,000 $600 $500 n/a $5,100 $5,100 $1,275 ($3,825) $0 $0 $0 n/a $0 $900 $225 $225 $0 $0 $0 n/a $0 $4,000 $1,000 $1,000 $100 $0 $0 n/a $100 $4,000 $1,000 $900 $0 $0 $0 n/a $0 $6,000 $1,500 $1,500 $0 $89 $0 n/a $89 $3,500 $875 $786 $0 $0 $0 n/a $0 $1,400 $350 $350 $81 $81 $0 n/a $162 $600 $150 ($12) $0 $0 $0 n/a $0 $300 $75 $75 $0 $0 $0 n/a $0 $400 $100 $100 $0 $0 $0 n/a $0 $400 $100 $100 $157,520 $12,619 $18,491 $0 $188,629 $300.000 $190,125 $1,496 $4,318 $0 $0 n/a $4,318 $15.651 $3.913 ($405) $0 $0 $0 n/a $0 $5.000 $1,250 $1,250 $4,868 $0 $0 n/a $4,868 $13,900 $3,475 ($1,393) $0 $0 $0 n/a $0 $5.000 $1,250 $1,250 $0 $5,640 $0 n/a $5,640 $35,500 $8,875 $3.235 $0 $5.835 $0 n/a $5,835 $42,300 $10,575 $4,740 $17,054 $55,586 $4,440 n/a $77,080 $198,900 $49,725 ($27,355) Page 1 COLLIER COUNTY PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THREE (3) MONTHS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2001 Motor Pool Rental Cellular Telephone Postage, Freight & Ups Electricity Trash & Dumpster Fees Rent Equipment Insurance General Auto Insurance Sprinkler System Maintenance Maintenance - Landscaping Autos & Trucks R&M Outside Vendor Fleet Maintenance - Labor Fleet Maintenance - Parts Fleet Maint. Non ISF Boat R&M Other Equipment R&M Printing - Outside Vendors Photo Processing Licenses & Permits Uniform Rental Chemicals Fuel & Lubricants - Outside Fuel & Lubricants - Inside Minor Operating Equipment Other Training & Educational Other Operating Supplies Total Field Services Capital Outlay Capital Expenditures Total Capital Outlay Security Personal Services Other Contractual Services Total Security Operations TOTAL APPROPRIATIONS Net Income from Operations Fund Balance @ 10 /l /O1 Fund Balance @ December 31, 2001 Fund Balance Allocations Reserved for Operations Reserved for Capital Outlay GENERAL FUNDS Water Community Street Total Rev/Exp F.Y. 2002 Management Beautification Lights Security Thru Dec. Budget 16J 2 Prorated Dec -01 Favorable Budget Unfavorable $0 $0 $0 n/a $0 $300 $75 $75 ($58) $65 $41 n/a $48 $2,000 $500 $452 $0 $13 $0 n/a $13 $200 $50 $37 $0 $198 $3,392 n/a $3,591 $26,600 $6,650 $3,059 $435 $1,211 $0 n/a $1,646 $15,100 $3,775 $2,129 $0 $4,202 $0 n/a $4,202 $9,400 $2,350 ($1,852) $2,000 $9,500 $800 n/a $12,300 $12,300 $3,075 ($9,225) $2,800 $5,500 $1,800 n/a $10,100 $10,100 $2,525 ($7,575) $0 $5,232 $0 n/a $5,232 $17,600 $4,400 ($832) $0 $4,667 $O n/a $4,667 $44,200 $11,050 $6,383 $0 $0 $0 n/a $0 $1,100 $275 $275 $0 $846 $0 n/a $846 $7,900 $1,975 $1,129 $112 $879 $0 n/a $991 $12,300 $3,075 $2,084 $0 $O $o n/a $0 $2,400 $600 $600 $0 $0 $0 n/a $0 $500 $125 $125 $0 $1,198 $320 n/a $1,518 $2,700 $675 ($843) $0 $137 $0 n/a $137 $0 $0 ($137) $0 $0 $0 n/a $0 $200 $50 $50 $53 $1,168 $o n/a $1,221 $700 $175 ($1,046) $511 $1,227 $0 n/a $1,738 $9,200 $2,300 $562 $8,995 $7,835 $o n/a $16,830 $112,100 $28,025 $11,195 $0 $0 $0 n/a $0 $700 $175 $175 $179 $1,775 $0 n/a $1,954 $13,800 $3,450 $1,496 $o $1,563 $o n/a $1,563 $3,200 $800 ($763) $O $170 $0 n/a $170 $1,200 $300 $130 $668 $39,629 $6,301 n/a $46,598 $46,400 $11,600 $34,998) $41,935 $154,077 $17,094 $0 $213,106 $668,451 $167,113 ($45,993) $6,893 $7,102 $6,893 $0 $20,887 $152,200 $38,050 $17.163 $6,893 $7,102 $6,893 $0 $20,887 $152,200 $38,050 $17,163 $o $0 $o $o $0 $0 $o $o $0 $0 $0 $84,687 $84,687 $402,500 $100,625 $15.938 $0 $0 $0 $84,687 $84,687 $402,500 $100,625 $15,938 $244,124 $320,665 $57,826 $84,687 $707,302 $2,597,151 $764,413 $57,111 $198,373 $808,029 $111,262 $214,723 $1,332,387 $0 $1,261,487 $70,901 $445.059 $744,545 $139,120 $153,540 $1,482,264 $1,349,400 $643,432 $1,552,574 $250,382 $368,263 $2,814,651 $1,349,400 $579,032 $1,401,074 $246,982 $364,263 $2,591,351 $368,000 $64,400 $151,500 $3,400 $4,000 $223,300 $223,300 Notes: Fund Balance at 10/1/01 (actual) includes Reserve for Encumbrances of $15,050.50 FY 2002 Unappropriated Fund Balance Budget includes $15,050.50 of Rolled Encumbrances and a $39,500 Budget Amendment in Security Page 2 16J 2' COLLIER COUNTY PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION STATEMENT OF REVENUE, EXPENDITURES AND CHANGES IN FUND BALANCE FOR THREE (3) MONTHS ENDING DECEMBER 31, 2001 Revenue Developer Contributions - WCI Interest Income Miscellaneous Income Interfund Transfers Assessment or Ad- Valorem Tax Levy Unappropriated Fund Balance Total Revenui Other Fees & Charges Property Appraiser Tax Collector Revenue Reserve Total Other Fees & Charge; NET REVENUI Appropriations: Engineering & Consultants Other Services Capital Outlay TOTAL APPROPRIATION'. Net Income from Operations Fund Balance @ 10/1/01 (Actual) Fund Balance @ December 31, 2001 Fund Balance Allocations CAPITAL PROJECTS FUNDS Prorated Clam Bay Uninsured Irr. & Land. Total Rev/Exp F.Y. 2002 Dec -01 Favorable Svstem Assets Analvsis Thru Dec. Budget Budget Unfavorable $6,875 $0 $0 $6,875 41,600 $10,400 ($3,525) $5,784 $11,483 $9,840 $27,107 84,700 $21,175 $5,932 $0 $0 0 $0 $0 $70,725 $0 $137,500 $208,225 832,900 $208,225 $0 $53,442 $0 $243,579 $297,020 360,700 $295,774 $1,246 $0 $0 $0 $0 1,056,832 $0 $0 $136,825 $11,483 $390,918 $539,227 $2,376,732 $535,574 $3,653 $0 $0 $0 $0 $7,200 $0 $0 $49 $0 $3,965 $4,014 $10,500 $4,014 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $19,000 $0 $0 $49 $0 $3,965 $4,014 $36,700 $4,014 $0 $136,776 $11,483 $386,954 $535,213 $2,340,032 $531,560 $3,653 $0 n/a $0 $0 $348,013 $87,003 $87,003 $14,769 n/a $318,523 $333,292 $1,747,904 $436,976 $103,684 $0 $0 $0 $0 $244,114 $61,029 $61,029 $14,769 $0 $318,523 $333,292 $2,340,032 $585,008 $251,716 $122,007 $11,483 $68,431 $201,922 $0 ($53,448) $255,369 $441,465 $1,079,967 $626,457 $2,147,888 $1,725,400 $563,472 $1,091,451 $694,888 E $2,349,810 $1,725,400 Reserved for Operations $563,472 $0 $694,888 $1,258,359 $0 Reserved for Capital Outlay $0 $1,091,451 $0 $1,091,451 $1,108,100 Notes: Fund Balance At 10/1/01 (Actual) includes Reserve for Encumbrances of $439,531.66 F.Y. 2002 Budget for Unappropriated Fund Balance Includes $439,531.66 in Rolled Encumbrances. Page 3 Donna Fiala District 1 James D. Carter, Ph.D. District 2 Tom Henning District 3 Fred W. Coyle District 4 Jim Coletta District 5 16J -2 3301 East Tamiami Trail • Naples, Florida 34112 -4977 (941) 774 -8097 • Fax (941) 774 -3602' c Mr. Glen D. Harrell 9589 Crescent Gardens Drive, Unit 202 Naples, FL 34109 January 9, 2002 Subject: Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee Dear Mr. Harrell: While convened in regular session on January 8, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners voted to re- appoint you to a 4 -year term on the Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee. Your new term will expire on January 29, 2006, or at such time as the Board re- appoints you or appoints your successor. On behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, I wish to extend our appreciation for your willingness to continue serving the residents of Collier County as a member of this advisory committee. If I can ever be of service to you during your term, please do not hesitate to contact me. JNC:sf cc: James Ward, Pelican Bay Services Division Commissioner, District 5 Donna Fiala District 1 James D. Carter, Ph.D. District 2 Tom Henning District 3 Fred W. Coyle District 4 Jim Coletta District 5 � 01 & 3301 East Tamiami Trail • Naples, Florida 34112 -4977 (941) 774 -8097 • Fax (941) 774 -3602 Ms. Cornelia Kriegh 5964 Pelican Bay Boulevard Naples, FL 34108 January 9, 2002 Subject: Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee Dear Ms. Kriegh: 16J 2 While convened in regular session on January 8, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners voted to re- appoint you to a 4 -year term on the Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee. Your new term will expire on January 29, 2006, or at such time as the Board re- appoints you or appoints your successor. On behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, I wish to extend our appreciation for your willingness to continue serving the residents of Collier County as a member of this advisory committee. If I can ever be of service to you during your term, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very James N' Coletta, Chaim Commissioner, District 5 JNC:sf cc: James Ward, Pelican Bay Services Division 16J 2' 1.` zLf a� Donna Fiala District 1 James D. Carter, Ph.D. District 2 Tom Henning District 3 Fred W. Coyle District 4 Jim Colette District 5 3301 East Tamiami Trail • Naples, Florida 34112 -4977 (941) 774 -8097 • Fax (941) 774 -3602 Mr. David A. Roellig 6000 Pelican Bay Boulevard, #504 Naples, FL 34108 January 9, 2002 Subject: Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee Dear Mr. Roellig: While convened in regular session on January 8, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners voted to re- appoint you to a 4 -year term on the Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee. Your new term will expire on January 29, 2006, or at such time as the Board re- appoints you or appoints your successor. On behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, I wish to extend our appreciation for your willingness to continue serving the residents of Collier County as a member of this advisory committee. If I can ever be of service to you during your term, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very yours J James . Cole a, Chairman Commissioner, District 5 JNC:sf cc: James Ward, Pelican Bay Services Division Donna Fiala District 1 James D. Carter, Ph.D. District 2 Tom Henning District 3 Fred W. Coyle District 4 Jim Coletta District 5 16J-2 1 �F 3301 East Tamiami Trail • Naples, Florida 34112 -4977 (941) 774 -8097 • Fax (941) 774 - 3602`x' January 9, 2002 Mr. James A. Carroll 8430 Abbington Circle #C -31 Naples, FL 34108 Subject: Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee Dear Mr. Carroll: While convened in regular session on January 8, 2002, the Board of County Commissioners voted to re- appoint you to a 4 -year term on the Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee. Your new term will expire on January 29, 2006, or at such time as the Board re- appoints you or appoints your successor. On behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, I wish to extend our appreciation for your willingness to continue serving the residents of Collier County as a member of this advisory committee. If I can ever be of service to you during your term, please do not hesitate to contact me. JNC:sf cc: James Ward, Pelican Bay Services Division Fiala 16 Carter Henning Coyle Coletta COLLIER COUNTY OV ENT PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION 801 LAUREL OAK DRIVE SUITE 605 NAPLES, FL 34108 (941) 597 -1749 FAX: (941) 597 -4502 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CLAM BAY SUB - COMMITTEE AT THE FOUNDATION CENTER, 8962 HAMMOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108 ON FEBRUARY 4, 2002 AT 10:00 A.M. AGENDA Roll Call 2. Review of Replanting Plan for Systems III and IV Cattail Removal Area. 3. Consideration of Proposal from Turrell & Associates, Inc. for Dune Restoration 4. Adjourn ADDITIONALLY, THIS NOTICE ADVISES THAT, IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE, WITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING, HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND THAT FOR SUCH PURPOSE, HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ANY PERSON REQUIRING SPECIAL ACCOMMODATIONS AT THIS MEETING BECAUSE OF A DISABILITY OR PHYSICAL IMPAIRMENT SHOULD CONTACT THE DIVISION OFFICE AT (941) 597 -1749 AT LEAST FIVE CALENDAR DAYS PRIOR TO THE MEETING. A a Fiala ✓ Carter Henning Coyle IV Colette 16J 2 To: AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION/ COMMITTEE MEMBERS- Jeffery Cecil, Mark Lindner, Bruce Mumm, John Houton, Chistine Chesser, & Gerry Moore. Notice: The October Affordable Housing Commission Meeting has been CANCELLED Workforce Housing Committee What: AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION/ AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE OCTOBER MEETING Where: COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE CONFERENCE ROOM E When: CANCELLED There are currently 4 vacancies on the Commission whicfl-will be filled as soon. as.._3',° possible. Hope to see you at the next scheduled meeting Novemf*Gll%r�900. Date:Q 1 Item# Copses To: I � J 2' MEETING NOTICE: Workforce Housing Committee What: AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION/ AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE NOVEMBER MEETING Where: HOUSING AND URBAN IMPROVEMENT DEPARTMENT 3050 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE, ste 145 When: THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 16, 2000 8:30 A.M. Who: COMMISSION/ COMMITTEE MEMBERS- Jeffery Cecil, Mark Lindner, Bruce Mumm, John Houton, Chistine Chesser, Gerry Moore, & Mario Valle. AGENDA 1. Approval of May 18`h minutes 2. Introduction of new member Mario Valle 3. Acceptance of Larry Mullins's resignation 4. Acceptance of Vanessa Fitz's resignation 5. Discussion: How can we stimulate Affordable Housing Development? 6. Goals? 7. Other business 8. Adjourn PLEASE CALL 403 -2330 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING. 16J 2 MEETING NOTICE: Workforce Housing Committee What: AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION/ AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE DECEMBER MEETING Where: COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE CONFERENCE ROOM C Note NewMeefing Place When: THURSDAY, DECEMBER 14, 2000 8:30 A.M. Who: COMMISSION/ COMMITTEE MEMBERS- Jeffery Cecil, Mario Valle, Mark Lindner, Bruce Mumm, John Houton, Chistine Chesser, & Gerry Moore. AGENDA 1. Approval of November 16th 2000 minutes 2. Discussion: Steps to accomplish our goals- Inclusionary Zoning- requirements on developments reaching a certain unit threshold. Review of draft ordinance from St. John's County. Multi - Family affordable housing (& bonus) allowed in all zoning districts, or create a new zoning district designed specifically for affordable housing. Possibility of granting a true waiver of impact fees for affordable housing rather than the current system which requires SHIP funds to reimburse the County. 3. Other business 4. Adjourn PLEASE CALL 403 -2330 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING. 16J 2 AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE HOUSING AND URBAN IMPROVEMENT OFFICE 3050 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, SUITE 145 December 14, 2000 Minutes ROLL CALL ABSENT PRESENT Jeff Cecil X Christine Chesser X Mario Valle X Vacant Mark Lindner X Vacant Bruce Mumm X Gerry Moore x John Houton X Staff present: Greg Mihalic Cormac Giblin Gary Young Lauren Beard Susan Golden Also present Bonnie Fauls -loan consortium Steve Popper Christine Chesser called the meeting to order at 8:40, there was a quorum present. November 2000 minutes approved. New staff members Lauren Beard and Gary Young were introduced to the committee. Discussion: Steps to Accomplish our goals - Cormac Giblin passed out a Draft entitled, "Inclusionary Zoning " - requirements on developments reaching a certain unit threshold. Review of draft ordinance 2000 from St. Johns County. Discussion followed regarding the contents of draft document from St. Johns County. The Commission discussed the inclusionary development requirements in the St. Johns ordinance draft. Also discussed was the need for a built in density bonus for development in certain areas. Concern was expressed for the over 300 families that were going to be displaced due to Lee County Land Condemnation. Discussion of impact fee waiver was discussed as the biggest barrier for affordable housing qualifications for the development industry. This, lead to discussion of upcoming of CBIA home being built, and possible approval of Impact Fee Waiver for this project. Cormac Giblin to answer on the BCC acceptance of the impact fee waiver at next meeting. 16J 2 Commission decided to wait and see if this project is approved and possibly pursue impact fee waiver in the same manner provided that the housing being built would go to qualified home buyers. Cormac Giblin stated that there was going to be a BCC Workshop in May for Affordable Housing. It was decided that the commission would work on a presentation for the BCC during that workshop. Bruce Mumm, realtor presented the commission with a proposal for increasing the workforce housing including the following: 1. Purchase 10 lots per month at $7,000.00 or less. 2. Contract with Modular Home builder to provide at wholesale 10 homes per month. 3. Contract with a builder possibly Creative Homes for permitting and site improvements. 4. Propose Collier County waive impact fees for 10 years if qualified buyers live in home. 5. Propose that SHIP funds be used for down payment and closing costs. 6. Propose that Collier County Loan Consortium handle sales and financing and take advantage of any low rate bond money. 7. Set up a Model Home at Collier County Fairgrounds. Next meeting Jan. 18, 2001, 8:30 a.m., Conference Room C, Community Developmental Services Building The meeting was adjourned at 9:45 a.m. 16J 2 j MEETING NOTICE: Workforce Housing Committee What: AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION/ AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE DECEMBER MEETING Where: COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE CONFERENCE ROOM C When: THURSDAY, JANUARY 17, 2001 8:30 A.M. Who: COMMISSION/ COMMITTEE MEMBERS- Jeffery Cecil, Mario Valle, Mark Lindner, Bruce Mumm, John Houton, Chistine Chesser, Gerry Moore, & David Ellis. AGENDA 1. Introduction of new member, David Ellis 2. Approval of December 14th 2000 minutes 3. Creation of Sub - committees to prepare for May BCC workshop 4. Steps to accomplish our goals- Inclusionary Zoning Multi- Family affordable housing (& bonus) allowed in all zoning districts, or create a new zoning district designed specifically for affordable housing. True waiver of impact fees for affordable housing, Single - Family waiver for builder spec homes. 5. Other business 6. Adjourn YOUR ATTENDANCE IS CRUCIAL AS WE PREPARE FOR THE SPRING HOUSING MEETING WITH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. MARK YOU CALENDARS FOR THE NEXT MEETING: February 15th 2001 PLEASE CALL 403 -2330 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING. AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE HOUSING AND URBAN IMPROVEMENT OFFICE 3050 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, SUITE 145 January 18, 2001 Minutes ROLL CALL Jeff Cecil Christine Chesser Mario Valle Vacant Mark Lindner David Ellis Bruce Mumm Gerry Moore John Houton Staff present: Cormac Giblin Gary Young Susan Golden Marcy Krumbine -loan consortium Others present: Steve Popper Cormac Giblin called the meeting to order at 8:52. ABSENT X I 16J 2 I PRESENT X X X X X Quorum was present. December 14, 2000 minutes approved with changes. New member David Ellis was introduced and he gave a brief overview of his background. Discussion: Creation of sub - committees for May 15, 2001 BCC Affordable Housing Workshop. It was suggested the at the BCC workshop in May each Commissioner be asked to be involved in role playing for the intent of experiencing what it is like to need to qualify for housing on a low to moderate income. A suggestion followed to invite Top Ten Collier County Employers to speak on wages that are currently being paid to employees in Collier County. Question was asked about CBIA project house and if the impact fee waiver was granted. Cormac Giblin answered with a yes that it had gone thru without exception and would not be a problem provided the home went to qualified buyers. He also stated that they were not true impact fee waivers due to the fact that SHIP pays them Commission decided to ask Patrick White from County Attorney's Office to attend the next meeting to discuss the impact fee waiver issues and others pertaining to affordable housing issues. Commission decided to look at how many lots are available with county liens and County subordination on them if donated for possible development of affordable housing. 16J 2 ! Discussion regarding possibility of Employer incentives for affordable housing to possibly be presented to BCC at May Affordable Housing Workshop. Commission discussed the possibility of presenting product availability at BCC Workshop in May. John Houton presented the idea to meet with the EDC stakeholders regarding the employers wages issues to be included in the BCC workshop in May. Marci Crumbine of loan consortium to present qualifications issues to BCC at May workshop. Marci also stated she would contact the Ministers Association regarding help for workshop preparation. Next meeting, February 6, 20001, Conference Room C., Community Development Bldg. 8:30a.m. Meeting adjourned 9:40a.m. 16J 2 " SPECIAL MEETING NOTICE: Workforce Housing Committee Special Strategic Planning Session What: AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION/ AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE - STRATEGIC PLANNING SESSION Where: COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE CONFERENCE ROOM C When: TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 6, 2001 8:30 A.M. Who: COMMISSION/ COMMITTEE MEMBERS- Jeffery Cecil, Mario Valle, Mark Lindner, Bruce Mumm, John Houton, Chistine Chesser, Gerry Moore, & David Ellis. AGENDA 1. Introductions 2. Approval of December 14, 2000 & January 18, 2001 minutes 3. Creation of subcommittees to prepare for May BCC workshop • Set the stage - -What is the problem • Who needs affordable housing • Potential solutions a) Inclusionary zoning b) Automatic / Administrative affordable housing and density bonus allowed in all zoning districts c) "True" waiver of impact fees for affordable single family homes- not reimbursed by SHIP funds d) Others............ 4. Other business 5. Adjourn YOUR ATTENDANCE IS CRUCIAL AS WE PREPARE FOR THE SPRING HOUSING MEETING WITH THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. MARK YOU CALENDARS FOR THE NEXT MEETING: February 15th 2001 PLEASE CALL 403 -2330 IF YOU ARE UNABLE TO ATTEND THE MEETING. 16J 2 MEETING NOTICE: Workforce Housing Committee What: AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION/ AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Where: COLLIER COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BUILDING 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE CONFERENCE ROOM E. When: THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 15, 2001 8:30 A.M. Who: COMMISSION/ COMMITTEE MEMBERS- Jeffery Cecil, Mario Valle, Mark Lindner, Bruce Mumm, John Houton, Chistine Chesser, & David Ellis. AGENDA 1. Introductions 2. Approval of December 14, 2000, January 18, 2001, & February 6, 2001 minutes 3. Acceptance of resignation of Gerry Moore from the Commission 4. Appoint new Chair/ Vice Chairpersons 5. Discussion regarding ideas to stimulate affordable housing to be brought up at workshop 6. Other business 7. Adjourn 16J 2 MEETING NOTICE: Workforce Housing Committee What: AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION/ AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Where: NCH Telford Center When: THURSDAY, March 15, 2001 8:30 A.M. Who: COMMISSION/ COMMITTEE MEMBERS- Jeffery Cecil, Mario Valle, Mark Lindner, Bruce Mumm, John Houton, Chistine Chesser, & David Ellis. AGENDA 1. Introductions 2. Briefing on the upcoming BCC Affordable Housing Workshop (date, location, format) 3. Report from the Identify and Present the Problem sub - committee 4. Report from the Partnership sub - committee 5. Report from the Solutions sub - committee & open discussion regarding ideas to stimulate affordable housing in Collier County 6. Other business Adjourn 1F�J 2 AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE HOUSING AND URBAN IMPROVEMENT OFFICE 3050 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, SUITE 145 ROLL CALL Jeff Cecil Christine Chesser Mario Valle Vacant Mark Lindner David Ellis Bruce Mumm John Houton Staff present: Greg Mihalic Cormac Giblin Wendy Klopf Susan Golden Marcy Krumbine- CC Extension Bonnie Fauls -CC Extension March 15,2001 ABSENT The meeting was held at the NCH Telford Center beginning at 8:30 am PRESENT X X X X X X X X X X X X David Ellis called the meeting to order and introductions around the room were made. Quorum was present. Business, Church, & Community Leaders were present (see attached sign in sheet). Marcy Krumbine of Collier County Extension Service and Loan Consortium presented 3 case studies regarding the housing crisis in Collier County. I 16J 2 The audience was broken down into small focus groups and came up with a list of the Effects and Solutions to the Affordable Housing problems in out community. EFFECTS 1. Employee vacancies & retention 2. Commute 3. Quality of life - Traffic 4. 2 million paid to house employees 5. Relocation of Money to other areas 6. Customer Service 7. Shared Housing 8. Lack of transportation (bikes) 9. Level of service decline and the effect on tourism 10. Seasonal employees SOLUTIONS: I. Programs Available 2. Public Transportation 3. Regional Problem -look outside area 4. Zoning - exclusionary/ density issues 5. Housing Allowance 6. More affordable housing - lower income rentals 7. Availability 8. Possible Tax or Impact Fee increase 9. Employee turnover 10. Increase Wages 11. Public & Private Funds 12. Housing types available 13. Open fringe lands Susan Golden of the City of Naples gave thanks to all who came and final words. The meeting was adjourned. 16J 2 ' MEETING NOTICE: Workforce Housing Committee What: AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION/ AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Where: Community Development Services Building Conference Room C. When: THURSDAY, April 19, 2001 8:30 A.M. COMMISSION/ COMMITTEE MEMBERS- Who: Jeffery Cecil Mario Valle Mark Lindner Bruce Mumm John Houton Christine Chesser David Ellis AGENDA Fax # 593 -2990 455 -7515 434 -2749 434 -6491 261 -1451 436 -5994 592 -0100 1. New 2001 Income Limits Released Other Staff Fax# Susan Golden 213 -1045 Marcy Krumbine 353 -7127 2. Suggested SHIP Down Payment Assistance Program revisions 3. Preparation for May 15th BCC workshop 4. Discuss Housing Fair or other activities for National Homeownership week 5. Other business 6. Adjourn 16J 2 MEETING NOTICE: Workforce Housing Committee What: AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION/ AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Where: Community Development Services Building Conference Room E. When: THURSDAY, April 5, 2001 8:30 A.M. COMMISSION/ COMMITTEE MEMBERS- Who: Jeffery Cecil Mario Valle Mark Lindner Bruce Mumm John Houton Chistine Chesser David Ellis AGENDA Fax # 593 -2990 455 -7515 434 -2749 434 -6491 261 -1451 436 -5994 592 -0100 Other Staff Fax# Susan Golden 213 -1045 Marcy Krumbine 353 -7127 1. Approval of January, February, and March 2. Review SHIP Housing Assistance Plan (adoption late April) 3. Review March 151h Key Leaders meeting 4. Preparation for May 151h BCC workshop 5. Discuss Housing Fair or other activities for National Homeownership week 6. Other business 7. Adjourn 16J 2 MEETING NOTICE: Workforce Housing Committee What: AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION/ AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Where: Community Development Services Building Conference Room E. When: THURSDAY, May 9, 2001 8:30 A.M. COMMISSION/ COMMITTEE MEMBERS- Who: Jeffery Cecil Mario Valle Mark Lindner Bruce Mumm John Houton Christine Chesser David Ellis AGENDA Fax # 593 -2990 455 -7515 434 -2749 434 -6491 261 -1451 436 -5994 436 -3878 1. Approval of April 4th and April 19th Minutes. 2. Preview of BCC workshop presentation 3. Preparation for June 9 Housing Fair 4. Other business 5. Adjourn Other Staff Fax# Susan Golden 213 -1045 CCES- Bonnie & Marcy 353 -7127 Other Participants Sam Durso 774 -0477 Dora Vidori 657 -5792 Frank Rodriguez 435 -7629 16J 2 MEETING NOTICE: Workforce Housing Committee What: AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION/ AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Where: Community Development Services Building Conference Room B ■ When: THURSDAY, June 21, 2001 8:30 A.M. COMMISSION/ COMMITTEE MEMBERS- Who: Jeffery Cecil Mario Valle Mark Lindner Bruce Mumm John Houton Christine Chesser David Ellis AGENDA 1. 3. 4. 5. 6. Fax # 593 -2990 455 -7515 434 -2749 434 -6491 261 -1451 436 -5994 436 -3878 Role Call Review of BCC workshop presentation - SHIP Sales Price Limit VLI Assistance Review of June 9 Housing Fair Summer Meeting Schedule Other business Adjourn Other Staff Fax# Susan Golden 213 -1045 CCES- Bonnie & Marcy 353 -7127 16J 2 NOTICE: Workforce Housing Committee What: AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION/ AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Summer Schedule and New Committee Role COMMISSION/ COMMITTEE MEMBERS- Who: Jeffery Cecil Mario Valle Mark Lindner Bruce Mumm John Houton Christine Chesser David Ellis Fax # 593 -2990 455 -7515 434 -2749 434 -6491 261 -1451 436 -5994 436 -3878 Attention Committee Members: Other Staff Fax# Susan Golden 213 -1045 CCES- Bonnie & Marcy 353 -7127 The Workforce Housing Committee meeting scheduled for Thursday July 19 has been cancelled. The Committee will not be meeting in August either. As mentioned at the last meeting the Board of County Commissioners has decided to take a more active role in the operations of their committees. Recently the Commission voted to create a new 11 member Workforce Housing Committee. Commissioner Fiala will be a member of this new committee. It was originally thought that the existing Affordable Housing Commission could fill the place of this new committee and Commissioner Fiala would join the existing commission. However, it now appears that the new Workforce Housing Committee will be made up of 10 new members plus the commissioner. The BCC is currently accepting applications for the new commission seats. Citizens are permitted to serve on a maximum of two advisory committees at once so by all means feel free to apply to serve on the new Workforce Housing Committee if you are eligible. It is planned that meetings of the new Workforce Housing Committee and the existing Affordable Housing Commission meeting will be held in the same room, at the same time, and from the same agenda. While the roles of these two committees are better defined, applications are accepted for the new committee, and the BCC continues its summer recess, neither committee/ commission will meet until the next meeting scheduled for Thursday September 20th. We hope to see you all there, and have a great summer break. 16J 2 MEETING NOTICE: Collier County Affordable Housing Commission What: AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION/ AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Where: Community Development Services Building Conference Room C. When: THURSDAY October 18, 2001 8:30 A. M. COMMISSION/ COMMITTEE MEMBERS- Who: Jeffery Cecil Mario Valle Mark Lindner Bruce Mumm John Houton Christine Chesser David Ellis Richard Snyder Ruth Grant AGENDA Fax # 593 -2990 455 -7515 434 -2749 434 -6491 261 -1451 436 -5994 592 -0100 1. Introduction of new members 2. Define the roles, goals, and functions of this commission 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Other Staff Fax# Susan Golden 213 -1045 Marcy Krumbine 353 -7127 Comm. Donna Fiala 774 -3602 Briefing of SHIP Down Payment Assistance Program revisions, review of 2001 State SHIP Report Current state of affordable housing update Paint your heart out update Other business Adjourn 16J 2 AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISION AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMITTEE HOUSING AND URBAN IMPROVEMENT OFFICE 3050 N HORSESHOE DRIVE, SUITE 275 10/18/01 ROLL CALL ABSENT PRESENT Bruce Mumm X Mark Lindner X Richard Snyder X Mario Valle X Jeffrey Cecil X David Ellis X Ruth Grant X Staff: HUI Cormac Giblin Wendy Klopf Lauren Beard City of Naples: Susan Golden Loan Consortium/ County Extension: Marcy Krumbine County Commissioner: Donna Fiala The meeting was held at the Collier County Community Development Building 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive, and called to order at 8:35 by Cormac Giblin. The meeting was called to order and introductions around the room were made. Quorum was present. 16J 2 Discussion: Discussion on the ordinance and the purpose of the commission, roles and goals for this year plus the Housing Fair. Explanation of the Housing fair- do we want to continue? Yes Introduction of the new Affordable Housing Committee with Commissioner Fiala as the chair. Applications are still being taken, no appointments as of yet. A good opportunity to develop awareness in the community without overlapping what this commission is doing already. Commissioner Fiala wants the two committees to work together on housing issues. Ideas in putting Affordable Housing in other areas of the county besides East Naples, finding ways to include this type of housing in new developments. Looking into density bonuses in Rural Fringe area. Define roles of both groups with relation to affordable housing. County staff member will sit on both committees to make sure there is no duplication. These committees need to work hand in hand and share information. Need for yearly workshop meeting with commissioners on Affordable Housing issues. S.H.I.P. Ordinance revision increasing Down Payment assistance to VLI to $5,000.00 per SFH. May raise Sales price to 149K. The SHIP annual report for FY 2001 was reviewed and discussed. Two new developments into the modular market, Diamond Shores and Leewood Lakes around the $100K price. In the Affordable Housing price range. Immokalee has new development, Arrowhead 1100 homes and apartments from $100K to $125K. Paint Your Heart Out is being moved to April or May. More information to come later on this project. Meeting adjourned 16J 2 MEETING NOTICE: Collier County Affordable Housing Commission What: AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISSION/ AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE Where: Housing and Urban improvement Dept. Office 3050 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite #275 (directly across the courtyard from our previous offices) When: THURSDAY November 15, 2001 8:30 A.M. COMMISSION/ COMMITTEE MEMBERS- Who: Jeffery Cecil Mario Valle Mark Lindner Bruce Mumm John Houton David Ellis Richard Snyder Ruth Grant AGENDA Fax # 593 -2990 455 -7515 434 -2749 434 -6491 261 -1451 436 -3878 1. Planning session: goals of this commission for 2001 -2002 2. Yearly review of commission to BCC 3. Other business 4. Adjourn Other Staff Fax# Susan Golden 213 -1045 Marcy Krumbine 353 -7127 16J 2 AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMISI6N AFFORDABLE HOUSING COMMITTEE HOUSING AND URBAN IMPROVEMENT OFFICE 3050 N HORSESHOE DRIVE, SUITE 275 11/15/01 ROLL CALL ABSENT PRESENT Bruce Mumm X Mark Lindner Richard Snyder Mario Valle Jeffrey Cecil David Ellis Ruth Grant Staff: HUI Cormac Giblin Gary L Young City of Naples: Susan Golden Loan Consortium/ Countv Extension: Marcy Krumbine 114 X X X X M The meeting was held at the Collier County Housing and Urban Improvement Dept. 3050 N. Horseshoe Drive, Suite 275 and called to order at 8:37 by Cormac Giblin. The meeting was called to order and introductions around the room were made. Quorum was present. Discussion: New Workforce Housing Commission/Affordable Housing Commission, discussion regarding what each is set forth to do in regard to Housing issues. Discussion regarding the longevity of both commissions, tools and how they could be used. Comments from members regarding Outreach verses Action by the Commission. 16J 2 Discussion of creation of a list of Accomplishments to be completed by next meeting. Review of Workforce Housing Committee Ordinances. Investigation into Special Needs Housing ie. Seniors Mentally Disabled Physically Disabled Discussion by members also regarding Inclusionary zoning and tiered impact fee schedules. Next meeting scheduled for December 13, 2001, 8:30 a.m. at Collier County Housing & Urban Improvement, 3050 N. Horseshoe Drive, suite 275. Meeting adjourned 9:45 a.m. 16J 2 ANNUAL ADVISORY BOARD REVIEW RE: COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC VEHICLE BOARD AND ADVISORY COMMITTEE STAFF AGENCY: Code Enforcement Department, Community Development and Environmental Services Division AUTHORITY: Collier County Ordinance No. 86 -41, as amended. SUBMITTED: SUMMARY: (Narrative about the board) 1. Whether the Board is serving the purpose for which it was created. 2. Whether the Board is adequately serving current community needs. 3. A list of the Board's major accomplishments for the preceding twelve month period. 4. Where there is any other Board or agency, either public or private, which is serving or would better serve the purpose for which the Board was created. 5. Whether the ordinance creating the Board should be amended to allow the Board to more adequately serve the purpose for which it was created. 6. Whether the Board's membership requirements should be modified. 7. The cost, both direct and indirect, of maintaining the Board. 3050 North Horseshoe Drive, Suit( Naples FL 34104 phone: 941/403 -2398 fax: :41/4 Carter Henning Coyle Coietta ENTERPRISE Z( 16J 2 DRAFT MINUTES OF NOVEMBER 29, 2001 EZDA MEETING The Enterprise Zone Development Agency meeting was held on Thursday, November 29, 2001, at the Habitat for Humanity Office on N. Ninth Street, Immokalee, FL Officio and Ex- Officio members in attendance: Raymond Holland, Chair Denise Blanton Floyd Crews Jerry Hubbart Ira Malamut Dora Vidaurri Al Neuman Fred Thomas not in attendance: Lucy Ortiz, Vice Chair Robert Asbel Bill Dillon Tony Sanchez Casey Wolff Guests attending - none staff attending: Marlene Foord, Planning Helene Caseltine, HUI Tom Tomerlin, Planning 1. Roll Call – Mr. Holland called the meeting to order at 10:20 a.m.; a quorum was present. 2. Approval of Minutes from September 20, 2001 Motion made to approve by Mr. Thomas, seconded by Mr. Crews, approved unanimously. J 3. Zone Activity • Ms. Caseltine stated that the Empowerment Alliance would like to participate in the Community Contribution Tax Credit program. A recommendation was made to support this request along with a recommendation that the BCC support their request. She stated that this will come before the BCC at their 12/11/01 regular meeting. • Ms. Caseltine also referenced the EZDA Annual report, which was included in the Board packets, stating it will be sent to the Governor's Office on Friday, November 30. • Ms. Caseltine then gave a summary f EZDA Coordinators' worksho ��,,,,,�� rlando,' saying that it was very informative; a draft of the workshop summary was provi ed in the Board members' packet. One change that became effective on Jul 11,20�s'z =—�-- increasing the minimum purchase price on new equipment to $5,000 w i negative effect on small businesses. She added that legislation is bein g written to change Ga ')os To: no EZDA Meeting Minutes of 11/29/01 Page two 16J 2 1 this threshold to $500. Mr. Thomas made motion to have staff write a letter to support this adjustment, Mr. Crews seconded, passed unanimously. 4. Old Business BCC Special Workshop held on November 6, 2001, Ms. Caseltine passed out copies of the presentation, stating that it was taped and aired by School Board on their channel 78 for Immokalee viewers. Fifteen tapes were made and are being distributed to speakers. Leadership Florida tour — Ms. Caseltine provided narration through Immokalee for this group, talking about projects in Immokalee, provided Future of Immokalee booklets, 60 people were on the bus from all over Florida. 5. New Business Discussion ensued about scheduling a local EZ workshop. EDC wants to be involved. Ms. Caseltine suggested it be done the same day as the Jan. 15 Everglades City workshop, which will be at 4:OOpm. If a noon workshop is held, lunch could be provided. Advertising will be done in newspapers, on the local television channels, plus fliers could be distributed through local organizations like Rotary. It was agreed that the workshop will be held on Tuesday, January 15, 2002, around the lunch hour. A local sponsor will be sought. Chairman Holland mentioned the possibility of coordinating with other agencies and programs such as Main Street, and possibly setting up a committee to provide updates and coordination. The next meeting will be held on January 24, 2002, immediately following the CRA Advisory Board meeting. 6. Adjourn With no further business, the meeting was adjourned at 11:05 p.m. Respectfully submitted: Helene Caseltine, CED Economic Development Manager 3050 North Horseshoe Drive, Suite 275 Naples FL 34104 phone: 941/403 -2398 fax: 94111 OW33 Carter w; Henning °i"" Co le 16J 2;n Y Coletta ll ENTERPRISE ZONE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY DRAFT MINUTES OF JANUARY 24, 2002 EZDA MEETING The Immokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency meeting was held on Thursday, January 24, 2002, at the Habitat for Humanity Office on N. Ninth Street, Immokalee, FL Officio and Ex- Officio members in attendance: Raymond Holland, Chair Denise Blanton Floyd Crews Jerry Hubbart Ira Malamut Lucy Ortiz (half of meeting) Guests attending Essie Serrata, CCHA not in attendance: Fred Thomas Robert Asbel Bill Dillon Tony Sanchez Casey Wolff Dora Vidaurri John Kirchner Herman Spooner Al Newman staff attending: Marlene Foord, Planning Helene Caseltine, HUI Lee Combs, HUI 1. Roll Call — Mr. Holland called the meeting to order at 10:45 a.m.; a quorum was not present. 2. Approval of Minutes from November 29, 2001 As there was no quorum, the adoption of the minutes was postponed to the following meeting. 3. Zone Activity • Ms. Caseltine stated that the Empowerment Alliance has now been approved by the Governor's Office as a "sponsor" under the Community Contribution Tax Credit program. • Ms. Caseltine announced that Florida Community Bank completed their building renovations and has sent in a request for a refund under the Business Equipment Sales Tax Refund program. However, there is a small glitch to be worklr'ct�,�. the Dept. of Revenue, which is being worked out. Nte: QL I ai Q 1 -z Immokalee EZDA Minutes January 24, 2002 16J Page two 2 4. Old Business • EZ Workshop Summary — The workshop last Tuesday, January 15, was very successful, with several EZDA members attending. There were 10 -11 attendees. It was very informal and many questions were asked. Most attendees were non - profits. A follow -up workshop may be held in September to make it possible for the CPAs who were all busy with tax season to come. Mr. Holland reminded everyone to get the word out to the community about the EZ program. Ms. Caseltine mentioned that the new owner of Cornucopia is interested in the program. Mr. Holland also mentioned that this program goes hand and hand with the Main Street program. Ms. Caseltine suggested that she go with Gabe Martinez (the new Main Street coordinator) to a Chamber board meeting to discuss changing the rules as it affects eligible Main Street businesses. HB 743/SB 1186 — Ms. Caseltine stated that at the last meeting she had mentioned legislation that would change the rule concerning sales tax refund on equipment, reducing the minimum purchase price to $500.00. The EZDA had agreed to send a letter to the local legislators and copies of the letter were provided to the members. 5. New Business • HUI /Community Development staff changes — Ms. Caseltine announced that there had been some recent staff changes at the county. Greg Mihalic, former HUI director, resigned mid - December and now Denny Baker, Business Manager at Development Services, is filling in as the Interim Director. CDES also has a new division administrator who started about two weeks ago. He is very eager to learn about what everyone is doing throughout the county, particularly Immokalee. • A brief discussion ensued concerning the Immokalee Public Forum held last Tuesday, January 15, at the Immokalee Middle School. The issue concerning the problem of funding for replacing mobile homes was mentioned and funding options were discussed, including the possibility of CDBG and SHIP funds. 6. Adjourn With no further business, the meeting adjourned at 11:00 a.m. The next meeting will be held on March 28, 2002, approximately 10:30 a.m., immediately following the CRA Advisory Board meeting. Respectfully submitted: Helene Caseltine, CED Economic Development Manager Fiala 116 Carter Henning Coyle Coletta COLLIER COUNTY LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD Wednesday, January 23, 2002 Headquarters Library AGENDA Call to order Approval of Minutes Literacy Program Report Reports of Officers Communications a: Written b: Personal Unfinished Business: 1. Regional Library Construction update 2. Employee of the Month 3. Marco Historical Society /Reading Park 4. Revision to Library By -Laws 5. Revision to Library Policies New Business General Considerations Director's Report Report of the Friends Adjournment :01 sawdo" _8 }BII :SA1.f0a '�St�1� Naples, Florida, December 12, 2001 16J 21 LET IT BE KNOWN that the LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD net on this date in regular session at 2:00 P.M. in the Main Library with the following members present: CHAIR: Syd S. Mellinger Jaculyn Dering Sabina Musci Diane Williams Absent: Doris J. Lewis Also Present: John W. Jones, Library Director Marilyn Matthes, Assistant Director Roberta Reiss, Literacy Coordinator Luz Pietri, Administrative Assistant APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mrs. Mellinger asked for comments or corrections to the minutes of October 24, 2001. There being none, Mrs. Dering moved, seconded by Mrs. Williams and carried unanimously, that the minutes be approved as submitted. REPORTS OF OFFICERS — None COMMUNICATIONS Mrs. Mellinger reported having received a response from her previous letter to Commissioner Coyle. UNFINISHED BUSINESS Mr. Jones reported that keys to the new building would be given on December 28 "'. The carpeting and the shelving are being installed now. Opening is expected in mid - February. The Board reviewed the nominations submitted for selection of the Library's Employee of the Month. Mrs. Dering moved, seconded by Ms. Musci and carried unanimously, to select Mona Butler as Employee of the Month for December 2001, Mrs. Mellinger commented that the BCC had approved the location of the Marco Historical Society's Museum with the recommendation that if the Friends of the Museum did not collect enough funds for the construction, that the land will revert back to the County. Mr. Jones reported that the Library had been hit with a 3% budget reduction after the last budget hearing. NEW BUSINESS —None Fiala Carter Henning Coyle _ Coletta 1 -75 /Golden Gate Interchange Advisory Committee Transportation Operations Department 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL 34104 January 30, 2002 AGENDA I. CALL MEETING TO ORDER: IL ATTENDANCE: III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 12, 2001 IV. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: V. OLD BUSINESS: VI. NEW BUSINESS: 1. Golden Gate Parkway Update/Lyn Thorpe, Collier County Project Mgr. VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS: VIII. ADJOURNMENT: This meeting will be held at 10:00 AM, Wednesday, January 30, 2002 County Commissioners Board Room Turner Building, Bldg. F, 3'd Floor Naples 10.2 { s.. -.. Jr t g J I 1AJ 2`4 1 -75 /Golden Gate Interchange Advisory Committee Transportation Operations Department 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL 34104 December 12, 2001 Mark Morton called the meeting to order at 10:10 AM. ATTENDANCE A. City of Naples: Honorable Bonnie MacKenzie, Mayor B. Golden Gate Civic Organization: Glenn Wilt, Bill Poteet, Jr., C. Unincorporated Collier County: Thomas A. Collins 11, Mark B. Morton D. Collier County: Edward J. Kant- Transportation Operators Director, Pam Lulich- ASLA Landscape Operations Manager, Bob Peterson - Landscape Operations, Nancy Siemion -ASLA Landscape Architect, E. Other: Sarah Clarke -FDOT Project Manager, Michael McGee -McGee & Associates, FDOT Landscape Architecture Consultant, Lynn Thorpe - Transportation Engineering Interchange Project Manager, Manpower Secretarial Services. ABSENT: Al Moore, Bryan Dennis, Norman Trebilcock, Mark A. Owen, Nicole Mills, Michael Rippe, Cheryl Neuman III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Correction to be made as to numbering the paragraphs in right numerical order. Under attendance, Gary Galleberg was absent, (not in attendance). With correcting the numbering of paragraphs, Par.VI should read: The curb area is raised 19% (not 19'). Par.VI should read: the planter is 8' in width — Ed Kant stated normally the curb is typically 6" or 8" and they may have been talking about the planter being 8' wide and 19" Long, & suggested the minutes be checked so they can be accurate. Moved by Mayor Bonnie MacKenzie to make the corrections as discussed, Seconded, and Approved. IV. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: A. Budget — Ed Kant It was brought to everyone's attention that the Public Informational Meeting was canceled & didn't feel it was appropriate at this time to get Public input due to the recent Sales Tax issue & get a better direction & workable program for Basic Funding, Upgrades, & possible added projects. A future meeting can still be scheduled after the first of the year. Mr. Kant then covered all the items on the handout "Committee List ". One issue he addressed under #2 Decorative Lighting was —the mounting height of the fixture which will determine the spacing — after getting a preliminary idea of what the spacing is (approx., 200 feet was discussed} -which would be 200 units at $600 — gives $12,000415,000 additional cost, which isn't the only addition, so will need to come up with a fully detailed list of these costs. 16J 21 In reference to Mike Rippe's August 12, 2001 letter, the breakdown of Estimated Cost of Amenities, Conventional Lighting (in lieu of high mast) is an increase of $208,000 to FDOT. Therefore the cost of going from a High Mass to a Colored Pole will be approx. $240,000. The upgrade would cost an additional $600.00 per fixture. It will be confirmed whether this cost includes the English Ivy Green paint finish or not. Sarah mentioned the $300,000 is for softscape landscaping and not available until 2005 -2006. Will need the money up front before letting the project. Sarah mentioned that Carter- Burgess has Mike McGee as a sub to do the landscaping plans, rather than have him do the final softscape after the fact, they will use those monies to do the design for the planters, fencing & bridge wall coating and FDOT will pick up the cost of the design. Mayor Bonnie MacKenzie asked how many planters are being referred to, and it was decided that these will be double - checked — Sarah has all the prices for the planters & fencing & will give to Pam. Additional funding sources was brought up & Ed mentioned that there are three things that he is aware of that will cost over and above the standard costs which are the Planters & Fencing, the Decorative Lighting, and the Texture. The rest has been handled by FDOT. Need to see some preliminary plans for the Landscaping before proceeding further or making any decisions. Two big issues now are 1) what will $300,000 buy for Landscaping -will it be what we are wanting - and 2) If there is a Noise Wall or not & whether we transfer the 80,000 or use it for this project. Sarah mentioned we might need to hire some design services for some of the issues facing the committee. Discussion followed on the different types and designs of fencing. It was realized that a redesign for the decorative mesh fence was not included in the Carter - Burgess estimate and that more alternatives (without a cage, to current FDOT standards) is needed. Several pictures were shown to the Committee, which displayed more pleasing design alternatives to the "decorative mesh fence ". Sarah felt Bryan Dennis could show some more attractive alternative designs and find out some costs on the Orlando designs. Mark asked Pam to contact the Colorado DOT for pricing & details. The overpass that was of interest is located in Broomfield, Colorado. In deciding on a date for the next meeting it was decided Committee is to submit their calendars to Pam Wor Bob for setting up the next meeting preferably on a Thursday at the end of January or beginning of February. Further discussion followed on Funding Sources such as: Public Private Partnerships, Grant Funding from FDOT, and other entities. Mayor Bonnie MacKenzie stated Mr. Gallebergs replacement would be made in February. Mr. Kant also mentioned that this committee was constituted as an ad hoc committee for 1 year which will be up in February they will go back to the Board of County Commissioners in January & request that the committee remain active for another year, it was a consensus of the committee to do so. It was moved by Mark Morton that for the next meeting the committee get some idea for costs on the alternative fencing, (on the top similar what was shown PJ 16J 2 + in Colorado) second, get the overall square footage that's going to be irrigated plus a budget cost contingency, third — a cost for doing the embankments and slopes similar to what has been done around the interchanges in St. Petersburg and finally a nice spec of canopy tree or clustering of palms for between 60th and 66th, along with unit prices for alternative ideas and costs. Seconded Glenn Wilt — Carried. V. OLD BUSINESS — None VI. NEW BUSINESS — None VII. PUBLIC COMMENTS — None No further discussion meeting was unanimously adjourned at 11:27AM. The next meeting will be determined at a later date. 1. 2. 3. Meandering Sidewalks ❖ The engineering plans can accommodate meandering sidewalks without revising the proposed cross - section. There is no additional cost. ❖ White Integral Color pigment added at no additional cost. Decorative Lighting ❖ FDOT will pay for the base furnished and installed price of $1,650 per fixture. The Committee has selected the "Mediterra" assembly in English Ivy Green. The mounting height is 40'. The additional cost is approximately $600 per assembly. ❖ FDOT will provide Christmas attachment wiring on each pole. Bridge Details: ❖ There will be no Jersey Barrier on the bridge. Since the bridge will be designed for a 45mph speed limit, a jersey barrier is not required. The Jersey barrier would be replaced with a 6" standard type F curb with wider 6' sidewalks. ❖ FDOT will pay for all integrally colored concrete banding and additives. The Committee selected white pigment with a nonskid finish ❖ The Committee would like to see raised planters /decorative fencing on the center median of the bridge. This is a non - budgeted item. Based on previous cost estimates (concrete planter $60,000) ❖ The Committee would like white integrally colored concrete on new piers, columns, beams, and columns. The cross beam to be integrally colored /painted English Ivy Green. 16J 2 j ❖ The Committee has agreed to decorative mesh fencing. FDOT has agreed to pay for the round posts or O.D. type Aluminum posts and colored coated paint material. FDOT has agreed to pay to match the curve of the light arm. FDOT will not propose a chainlink cage. ❖ The Committee would like applied texture to the 4' wall of the bridge. The pattern is a "Custom Rock" form liner in a stacked rock pattern. This would include: Columns, coping, concrete stone forming, concrete base of light fixture and any additional texturing. The most important are is the top deck rather than piers. 4. The Committee would like landscaping at the base of the interchange similar to St. Pete. Airport which is planted with several rows of sabal palms and oleander. FDOT is adding additional modular concrete components to the structural embankment but it will not match existing slope pavement. FDOT will paint the concrete English Ivy Green (Collier County Color used in Transportation) and coat with anti- graphiti coating. 5. The Committee has hired Carter - Burgess to incorporate additional Decorative items into their construction documents. The money will come out of FDOT budgeted money for landscaping. 6. To achieve a Level 3 Landscaping and additional decorative bridge improvements the Committee will have to: 1. Direct staff to go to the Board to request additional money in the amount of approx. 2.5 Million. 2. Seek private /public funding. 3. Seek FDOT matching grant money. Hale 2 Carter Henning Coyle Coletta WORKFORCE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE - AGENDA February 4, 2002 — 3:30 p.m. Board of County Commissioners' Conference Room 1. Introduction. 2. Review and approve January 7, 2002 minutes. 3. Follow up discussion on the SHIP Program options. 4. Follow up discussion on inclusionary zoning, vested rights within permitted PUD's and providing credits and incentives. 5. Susan Golden — follow up on the Florida Keys use of the 4th cent of Bed Tax for workforce housing. 6. Incentives to add workforce housing to existing PUD's. 7. Review of the formula used by the Regional Planning Council to determine the impact of commercial and industrial PUD's on workforce housing. 8. Report on linkage fees — Denny Baker 9. Prepare overview of committee's work for the April Board of County Commissioners meeting. DF/kmm 1d {SC. CorrCS: �e: a l02 ) LtA l C: - - t';' 10" IAJ 2 WORKFORCE ROUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE January 7, 2002 Minutes I. Meeting convened at 3:35 p.m. Members in attendance: David Ellis Joe Paterno Barb Cacchione Mario Valle Susan Golden Staff present: Commissioner Fiala Cormac Giblin Members absent: Karen Homiak Dave Carpenter Guest: Debrah Preston Forester Mark Strain Larry Keesey Denny Baker Kathy Mayhood Mark Lindner Vince Cautero Copies of the State of Florida 2001 Affordable Housing Study Commission were provided for all committee members. Minutes of the December 13, 2001 meeting were approved. II. Commissioner Fiala indicated that the Workforce Housing Committee would probably need to provide an overview of their work to the BCC in April. Commissioner Fiala also reviewed issues discussed at the December meeting including: all areas of the County need to provide some affordable housing to provide a better balance betweens jobs and housing and minimize traffic impacts; inclusionary zoning concept where all PUD's provide some workforce housing; linkage fee concept between commercial construction and jobs created, and other similar topics. III. Discussion ensued on the possibility of opting out of the SHIP (State Housing Initiative Partnership) program and keeping all of the SHIP allocated doc stamp tax within Collier. Cormac Giblin will research the amount of funding collected in Collier in relationship to our return. IV. Inclusionary zoning discussion addressed the need to provide flexibility for developers in providing workforce housing within the PUD or within proximity to the development. For PUD's that include multifamily units there are easy design mechanisms to include workforce housing for their employees. Even multiple units could be located in what appears to be a single family home from the outside (i.e. one entrance) but accommodate separate interior entrances. Larry Keesey raised the issue of vested rights within permitted PUD's. There was also a discussion of providing credits and incentives. 1hj 2 Workforce Housing Meeting Minutes — January 7, 2002 Page 2 V. It was stated that linkage fees might be easier to implement because they would be based on a nexus of commercial and upscale residential development generating jobs and therefore creating a need for workforce housing. Denny Baker indicated that the HUI staff would locate prior linkage fee research from Oliver - Tindall, the County Attorney and other sources for the February meeting. VI. Susan Golden indicated that there is a proposal in the Florida Keys to use the 4th cent of Bed Tax for workforce housing. She will contact staff in the Keys, DCA and Chuck Mohlke to gather more information. VII. It was determined that the committee should prepare a list of "realistic" incentives to add workforce housing within existing PUD's. All committee members are requested to bring ideas and a list of incentives will be brainstormed at the February meeting. VIII. Larry Keesey suggested reviewing the formula used by the Regional Planning Council's to determine the impact of commercial & industrial PUD's on workforce housing. There was also a discussion on the need to provide a good rational nexus for impact fees tiered to square footage. Mario Valle provided an overview of the Palm Beach County impact fees which are tiered more heavily than Collier's. IX. Meeting adjourned at 5:15 p.m. Fiala Carter Henning Coyle Coletta 1(�J. 2' d ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL AGENDA February 6, 2002 9:00 A.M. Commission Boardroom W. Harmon Turner Building (Building "F ") — Third Floor I. Roll Call II. Approval of Agenda III. Approval of January 2, 2002 Meeting Minutes IV. A. Planned Unit Development No. PUDZ- 2001 -AR -1842 "East Gateway PUD" Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 26 East B. Preliminary Subdivision Plat No. PSP- 2001 -AR -1566 "Hemingway Place PSP" Section 22, township 49 South, Range 25 East V. Old Business VI. New Business VII. Growth Management Update VIII. Subcommittee Report IX. Council Member Comments X. Public Comments L 't,:,C- 0orrGs: •.itr / is 3 l C : r-,S 0: XI. Adjournment Council Members: Please notify the Current Planning Secretary no later than 5:00 p.m. on January 30, 2002 if you cannot attend this meeting or if you have a conflict and will abstain from voting on a particular petition (659 - 5741). General Public: Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto; and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. December 5, 2001 16J2 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL NAPLES, FLORIDA DECEMBER 5, 2001 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Environmental Advisory Council, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9 a.m. In REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Thomas W. Sansbury Michael G. Coe Ed Carlson William W. Hill Alexandra Santoro Larry Stone Alfred F. Gal Chester Soling NOT PRESENT: Erica Lynne ALSO PRESENT: Patrick White, Assistant County Attorney Barbara Burgeson, Senior Environmental Specialist Page 1 16J z December 5, 2001 CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. The December 5th meeting of the Environmental Advisory Council called to order. Let's call the roll if we could. MS. BURGESON: Lynne. Erica has an excused absence. Hill. MR. HILL: Here. MS. BURGESON: Carlson. MR. CARLSON: Here. MS. BURGESON: Sansbury. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Here. MS. BURGESON: Coe. MR. COE: Here. MS. BURGESON: Santoro. MS. SANTORO: Here. MS. BURGESON: Gal. MR. GAL: Here. MS. BURGESON: Soling. MR. SOLING: Here. MS. BURGESON: And Stone. MR. STONE: Here. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. We do have a quorum. Approval of the agenda. Are there any additions, deletions, revisions, comments on the agenda? MS. BURGESON: Not by staff. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Excuse me? MS. BURGESON: Not by staff. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Not by staff. MR. HILL: Move to approve. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY; Moved by Mr. Hill to approve. Do I hear a second? MS. SAN'I'ORO: Sei.�orid. Favor "', December 5, 2001 (No response.) 16J 2 CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Hearing no opposed, passed unanimously. One thing I did ask Barbara during the week and I want to run it past you -all just as a thought is, I kind of lose track of what happens to the items that we have reviewed here, the various land -use petitions, and I've asked, if -- if it's okay with the rest of the board, to have an agenda item to kind of update us, if we could, on where it is before the Planning Commission and where it is for BOCC and -- if you -all think that's a good idea. Okay? MR. CARLSON: Great idea. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Great idea. Thank you. MS. BURGESON: I talked to Susan Murray about that, and she said that there are summaries on the -- on the county web site. So what we can do is just make copies of those and send those to you with each future EAC packet. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. I appreciate it. All right. Minutes for the November 7th meeting. Do I hear a motion to approve? MR. SOLING: So moved. MR. COE: Second. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: So by Chester. Second by Mr. -- I'll get it in a minute. I'm just a little slow this morning, okay - -- Mr. Coe. All in favor? (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Hearing no opposed, passed unanimously. Land -use petitions. Mr. White, I am directly involved with this particular petition, thus I ant going to rectise myself from the C iscussion and the vote and turn the gavel over to Mr. Coe. MR. WHITE: Cert&inly, upon filling a Form 8 -B, the rtzles Page 3 December 5 200-x- 6 J 2 allow you to participate in the discussion. If you choose to step down from the chair, I believe that may be appropriate, but like I said, you are entitled to participate in the discussion under the rules, and you're just only prohibited from voting. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Thank you, sir. All right. MR. COE: All right. Go ahead. Pat, you want to swear them in? (The oath was administered.) MR. REISCHL: Good morning, Council Members. Fred Reischl, planning services. This is a request for a special treatment development permit and for a conditional use for a sporting and recreational camp. The location, as you can see on the monitors, is in the eastern part of the county. This is Oil Well Road, and this is State Road 29, and it's located in the southwest corner. The closest landmark is the general store that's in the northeast corner of the intersection of those two roads. The subject property is 38 acres, the subject of the ST and the conditional use. The property that's controlled by the applicant is over 4,500 of the surrounding acres. The property is outside the urban designated area; however, it's not one of the uses that is prohibited by the final order of the governor and cabinet, so this conditional use and ST can go forward to the EAC, Planning Commission, and Board of County Commissioners. The underlying zoning for the property is rural agricultural. There is a mobile home overlay which generally means for every -- excuse me -- for every -- excuse me, for every 5 -acre parcel, instead of a conventional home, you can put a mobile home on it. And over a portion of the property, the majority of the property, there is also ACSC -ST Overlay which is Area of Critical State Concern, Special Treatment Overlay; therefore, this ST permit is before you. Wellh the cob >rs Aren't s i.owing up as w e 1 l as I thoug.fi t ou here, E' fir, 4 16J P December 5, 2001 low but this is the 3 8 acres and the access road -- the access road shown is coming in this way (indicating) to the parcel which is over in :here (indicating). On a line drawing, it looks a little better. You can see the yellow as the ACSC line. South of the yellow line is the area of critical state concern. The blue line is the boundary of the subject petitions, and the red are the structures, the 14 cabins, the hunting lodge, and the accessory structures, hunting building, parking areas, things like that. We -- after consulting with the applicant, we do have a change to Condition No. 3, which is on page 6. I'll give you a second to find that. Condition 3 on page 6 of the staff report, and where it says (as read): "This conditional use and ST permit shall," we would like to replace that with, "All future development order submittals shall." Because conditional use in the ST permit are consistent with the laws today, what we're looking for is the future development orders, site development plan, building permits, et cetera, shall be consistent with the code at the time that those are issued. And with that, here's Barbara Burgeson for the environmental portion. MS. BURGESON: For the record, Barbara Burgeson with planning services. The environmental issues on this 38 acres are actually very minimal. The majority of the property has been cleared and used for pasture. There's a small edge along the eastern portion of the property that's wooded, and they will be required to retain 25 percent of the existing native vegetation of that. The cabins are located up against that edge -- that edge of wooded vegetation, so we anticipate that the majority of that vegetation will be retained on site. The consultant was required to do an EIS and wildlife survey as well as a wildlife management plan for the 3 8 acres, and that is included in your EIS and your packet with you. Staff recommends approval of the petition. with the stipulations as changed, the one that 1. ago ,i December 5, 21 t J 2 11 was changed by Fred and also wants to bring to your attention that the petition or the package, the Stipulation No. 5, when the SDP petition is submitted to staff, that it will be sent to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission for their comments, and they will be allowed the standard, which right now is 30 days for review and comment back to staff before we incorporate those into the final SDP approval. MR. CARLSON: I have a question for Barbara. MR. COE: I'm sorry. I'm over here asleep. MR. CARLSON: Okay. The area of critical state concern, what are the rules and regulations for development? My recollection is that no more than 10 percent of the area -- of the overall area can be impacted in an area of critical state concern; is that correct? MS. BURGESON: That's right. MR. CARLSON: But how does that relate to agriculture? MS. BURGESON: Agriculture -- principle agricultural uses are exempt from the area of critical state concern, 10 percent restriction. That was lifted out of the Land Development Code, my guess is about four or five years ago. MR. COE: Any other questions, comments? MR. VARNADOE: Thank you, Mr. Coe. For the record, George Varnadoe from the law firm of Young, Van Asfenderp, Varnadoe & Anderson for the applicant, Barron Collier Investments, Ltd., the property owners. Also here today to answer questions that you might have are Blake Able and Tom Jones, the Barron Collier organization; Dominic Amico and Steven Sposato of Agnoli, Barber & Brundage who were the engineers and planners on the project; and Todd Turrell and Tim Hall of Turrell & Associates who are the environmental consultants. .As Fred told you., the land owners are proposing to Construct fac.i_.Lities for a, private hntiting a :nd fishing drib on land owns in the, December 5 200116 J 2 rural area of Collier County. In order to construct the lodge and the cabins, it's necessary we get a conditional -use permit and ST permit. The conditional -use permit is for sporting and recreational camp which is conditional use 20 in our ag- zoning district. The property's located in the agricultural- designated area of Collier County. It's approximately 1 mile south of County Road 858 and approximately 3/4 of a mile west of State Road 29. The conditional -use site is outlined in yellow here (indicated) on this aerial, is 3 8 acres as Fred mentioned. The property is bordered on the south by the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge. I can't hardly get used to that name. I'm so used to calling it the panther refuge. And that boundary is about along this old fence line you see right there (indicating). Most of the land is in the Big Cypress area of critical state concern, as Fred mentioned, and that line is that black dotted line you see going east - west across the property. A little portion of it is outside, but most of it is inside. And as Mr. Carlson noted, the area of critical state concern rules and regulations -- mostly state rules and regs and the ones that Collier County has adopted which are identical allow only a 10 percent site alteration and then only half of that 10 percent to be impervious surface. On the site we're going to have a main lodge building of up to 14,000 square feet. I don't think we'll get there. It's going to be -- and this is a blowup, if you would, of that 38 -acre site over here, aerial. The main lodge building is going to be in this area (indicating). It will not have overnight accommodations. It'll have a great room, a dining area, probably a small library and a recreational area. The cabins, of which there'll be up to 14, will be scattered along the periphery of this mixed hardwoods hammock of which -we're backing up to, and the idea. is to kind orplace the cabins close to that �,vithout i.ntrudirig into it, insuring some privacy, given that silvan -Page 7 December 5, 2001 setting that you have in a traditional hunt club. 16J 2 The other structure on site will be what we call the hunting building which will also serve as a welcome lodge at approximately this location (indicating). We'll have parking area here coming in off the access road. And then for the future access into the site will be on foot or by golf carts trying to, again, keep that traditional low - intensity use. The site was -- as you can see, there's a -- Barron Collier, with the exception of this corner here, controls or owns all the land over in this area. We had a great variety of locations to choose from in or out of the area of critical state concern. We didn't use that as criteria simply because we knew that we could meet the rules and regulations regarding that. We chose this carefully for several reasons. Number one, it really gives you some great aesthetics looking across this pasture at the various hammocks, if we could back up to this wooded hammock. It also allowed us to use existing improved and some not -so- improved farm roads, as anybody that's been out in that area for access without disturbing any wetlands which is good. The site is completely uplands. We're not impacting any wetlands, and we're trying to minimize our impacts to naturally vegetated areas. We design it to minimize the impervious surfaces. The entry road is going to be either shell or rocks on impervious surface in keeping with traditional low -key hunting lodge approach. And the fact that we are using the golf carts, again, trying to lessen the impacts on the natural system. The single - access road is off State Road 29 in this location here, (indicating) and it's surrounded by old barrow pits which we will be utilizing for our fishing activities. While we're talking about access, the access you're shown here comes up on an improved road and thell_ alp on a lime rock t:o ad th i t w�i s thrown out when they dug the 1)its December S, 2001 and then on farm roads into the site. 16J z We also want to explore with staff an alternative routing which may be this area in here, (indicating) although it's not wetlands and is disturbed in the fact that when they dug the pit, they threw the lime rock up to have access for the machinery, is low, and even this time of year when I was out there two weeks ago, it's still kind of muddy. This route is much higher and drier on either side of this pit, and even though you can't see it on here, there's an unimproved farm road here we want to explore, and staff, maybe an alternate access that would be less impactive than utilizing this route here. The major activity on the site is going to be quail hunting, as you can imagine in this -- in this area. As Fred has mentioned, the project is consistent with our Growth Management Plan and future land -use elements, the rules and regulations to the area critical -- area of critical state concern and the interim amendments to the future land -use element under which the rural assessment study is currently being conducted. We contacted our neighbors to the south, both the panther refuge -- if you'll let me use that name -- and Big Cypress National Refuge which is down the other side of 29, down that way. And discussion with the panther refuge folks really ended up surrounding areas of mutual interest, and those include controlled burning, controlling exotics and thinning of midstory vegetation. We have agreed with them not to allow any big game hunting within a quarter mile of their border, to not put any additional fencing on the south border which would allow the free movement of panthers and other creatures, and the fencing on the east and north if we're going to put in -- and I don't mean around the creative site but around the entire area in this area here, (indicating) to coordinate with there on the type of fencing so as clot to impact any panther movement. The EIS and_ the Wildlife Management. Plan require the Page 9 December 5, 2f 1 6J 2 application, and if you have questions on that, I will be glad to answer. If there are any questions I can answer, I will be glad to address them. MR. COE: Anv auestions or comments? Thank you very much. MR. HILL: Mr. Varnadoe, would you quickly, with your laser, outline the 4,500 acres. MR. VARNADOE: Yes, sir. And I want to clear up a little misnomer. The Barron Collier owns all the land over here but -- Tom, make sure I'm using the right place. If I look at this vertical line here or that one there. Sorry. My map on the scale -- it's basically this property and then we come over about like that (indicating). MR. SOLING: May I ask a question just out of curiosity? Your 3 8 acres, why the jogs, particularly that southerly jog into the property? MR. VARNADOE: We wanted to -- that is a little wetland area there, and we just wanted to show that we were staying out of the wetland areas, Mr. Soling. That's the only reason for that -- that area there. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Any other questions or comments? Thank you very much. MR. VARNADOE: Thank you. MR. COE: Any public comments? Okay. Up for discussion. MR. CARLSON: Well, then I guess I would like a little more information on the -- the fence, and I must say that I did have a conversation with the manager of the panther refuge who is concerned about the fence and what kind of fence that's proposed to be. Is it something a panther can get through or around? 1/'IR. VARNAD('.)f;: Mr. Carlson, I mentioned that becatise I .anted to be very tip front: with the fact we are tryilig to coordirulte Page 10 December 5, 21 16416 2 with our neighbors. It, obviously, is outside the area we're discussing t9day, the 38 acres, but what we are doing is continuing negotiations -- discussions with them on that subject. The idea is to have a fence that the panther can go over, yet would discourage poachers and other people from coming onto the private property. It's going to be around the road, mainly 29 and 858. But -- but, yes, we are -- that has been the one issue that we haven't been able -- we haven't finalized addressing with the panther folks, and we're continuing to close those conversations. MR. CARLSON: So you don't think just a barbed -wire fence with post -it signs would deter a poacher? MR. VARNADOE: It may well be, sir. You know, we've been talking with Dave Mayor on -- on some land- management practices out here, and -- you know, he said even up to an 8 -foot chain -link fence, the panther is not going to deter him, but we haven't -- don't get me wrong. That's not been decided. That's why we want to make sure that we are -- we are working with our neighbors on -- on that issue. MR. COE: Any other questions or comments? Deliberation? Do I have a motion? Discussion? MR. CARLSON: Do you want discussion? MR. COE: That would be nice too. MR. CARLSON: Well, from the viewpoint of someone who's been watching this county systematically bulldoze and destroyed for decades for residential development and golf courses and agricultural development, this is kind of refreshing, and -- and I would not only hope this project is approved, I hope it succeeds and it's financially successful and this kind of activity increases in the rural parts of the county. MR. COE: Any other discussion? MR. CARLSON: I'll move to approve if you're ready. Page 1. _1. December 5, 2f I 6J 2 MR. COE: We have a motion to approve. Do I have a second? MR. HLLL: Second. MR. COE: We have a second from Mr. Hill. All for. (Unanimous response except Chairman Sansbury who abstained.) MR. COE: All opposed. (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Let the record reflect, I did not vote. Okay. Got it back? MR. COE: You got it back. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Thank you, gentlemen. Okay. Here we go. Next item, LDC amendments. MS. BURGESON: Actually, the next item, I believe, is the last item on the agenda, the Land Development Code amendments. This is continued from last month's meeting. Matt Grabinski is here to make his presentation. This is a Land Development Code amendment proposal from the Ritz - Carlton, not a staff - generated proposal. MR. GRABINSKI: Good morning. Matt Grabinski here on behalf of the Ritz - Carlton. As I'm sure most of you recall, the issue of beach events and the use of vehicles on the beach made its way up and down the county ranks for the past two years, a series of amendments. Those amendments culminated at the meetings last June with the Board of County Commissioners approving numerous revisions to the Land Development Code pertaining to the use of vehicles on the beach and the conducting of beach events by hotels during sea turtle nesting season. One of the very heatecl issues; for the past: year hCas been the _tine and penalty stricture of that portion of the code. Staff had originally proposed a fine �iii(1 pe ,- lty strtict:rire that would have given Collier December 5, 2001 6J 2 County the ability to temporarily or permanently suspen or revoke a beach -front owner's right to host beach events on its beach if numerous and significant code violations occurred. Needless to say, the hotels strongly opposed that point of the amendment, and in the end on June 20th the county commissioners agreed with us on that issue and agreed to adopt a fine structure that had a significantly increased monetary fines for code violations but expressly provided that the beach - events permit could not be suspended or revoked. At that meeting on June 20th -- and I have a complete copy of the minutes that contain the discussion -- the issue arose as to the whole revocability of the permit, and there was discussion by several of the commissioners over the fact that while they were supporting us on that issue, it seemed illogical to them that Collier County issue a permit that couldn't be revoked, and I suggested that perhaps they would -- would like to rewrite the code or clean it up and turn it into more of a notice procedure. And they agreed with me and went along with all of our amendments, including adding language to the code that would provide that the beach - events permit could not be suspended or revoked but also requested staff to redraft the code and turn it into a notice process. And, again, if you -- if you would like, I could read those portions of the minutes to you or I could just try to get through this as quickly as possible. County staff requested that the commissioners place the burden of drafting that amendment back on the hotels. They felt that they had spent enough time on the issue, and I think we all have spent enough time on this issue, and so we agreed to do that. And so rather than this coming through the process as a staff - sponsored amendment, it is coming through this process as an amendment privately sponsored by the Ritz- Carlton; however, the amendment was drafted at the express direction of the county commissioners, and Page 13 December 5, 2001 that is the language that is before you today. 16J And unless you have any further questions, since this is a privately sponsored amendment, I would just like to sit back down and let you listen to other public comment, and then I would appreciate an opportunity to respond to any issues that may be raised by other members of the public. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Thank you. I'm a little confused, Barbara. Explain where we're going here. I'm not exactly sure what we're looking at right now. MS. BURGESON: Okay. This -- this amendment, as Matt mentioned, the -- last year we went through the round of amendments all the way up to the point where the final Board of County Commissioners met on this. There was a penalty section and the ability to revoke under circumstances of extreme violations. At the last Board of County Commissioners meeting, in discussion they added language to the Land Development Code that says the permit cannot be revoked. So for no reason could staff or the Board of County Commissioners revoke the permit. Discussion was also brought up that if it could not be revoked, then maybe it shouldn't even be a permit; maybe it should just be a notice. And so -- so there was some interest on the board's position to consider that, and Matt brought that back as a proposed amendment. However, staff has had a good deal of time to review that, not only with our concerns and the difference between the notice and a permit, but the other language that was proposed. We brought it to the attention of the county attorney's office for an interpretation, which was sent to each of you, e- mailed and hard - copied, and it is staff s opinion through meetings -- several meetings over the past couple of months, that even though the board had directed this be considered, we don't feel. it's in the best interest of the ply blic to support this -- this amendment. The -- there are several re�isoiis, Init the inost obvious reason. is for staff, is that Page 14 December 5, 201 b J 2 when you're noticing something as opposed to doing a permit, you cannot put specific conditions on it. You can't tailor that permit. It's just a notice. It takes away some ability for us to protect the sea turtle endangered species on the beaches. And also I wanted to let you know what the summary of this petition up to this point has been. It went to the development services advisory subcommittee, and they unanimously supported staffs position. It went to development services advisory full committee. They had eight members attending, which is what they need for a quorum. Two had to abstain because of conflicts of interest, so they lost the quorum for the vote; however, they voted 4 to 2 in favor of supporting staffs position. It went to the Planning Commission twice, and in the final motion it was a unanimous vote to support staff s position and not to recommend approval of the amendment. MR. WHITE: If I may, Mr. Chairman, I believe that the DSAC vote -- the majority vote was to support the applicant's position, not staffs; is that correct, Barbara? MS. BURGESON: No, that's not correct. MR. WHITE: Okay. My recollection is incorrect then. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Yes, sir. MR. SOLING: Can I offer an observation? CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. MR. SOLING: July 31 st I moved and made my permanent home here in Florida. Because the days are long on occasion, at least probably once a week, I would drive down to the end of Vanderbilt Beach Road and at night, before the sunset, walk the beach either 2 miles north of Vanderbilt Beach Road or 2 miles south of Vanderbilt Beach Road, and I can tell you this: Throughout the summer, starting August 1 st, I never was out on that beach where I didn't see repetitive tire tracks up and down the beach, and that goes in front of the Ritz too. Two miles north and 2 miles south it looked like they were Page I 'f? December 5, 2T 1 J 6 2 having drag races or just continual running up and down the beach with vehicles. And I reported it to the appropriate authorities, but I don't know what happened. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Mr. Soling, I remember because I did ask this question at the time you mentioned this before, and that is, there are other authorized -- a lot of other authorized traffic on the beach, i.e., our own department, law enforcement, things of that sort. So just necessarily -- because there were tire tracks, I don't believe that's -- necessarily means that these guys are running up and down the beach. I don't know, but I know that being out there -- MR. SOLING: I'm not accusing anybody. I'm just saying I saw tire tracks. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: All right. Okay. MR. WHITE: Mr. Chairman, if I could help frame where we are, your question to staff was where we were going with this. I think it's appropriate to put on the record that what's proposed by the applicant is a series of amendments to LDC Section 2.6.34, and although there is a provision in there that talks about the use of vehicles on the beach, I do not believe that is proposed for any amendment. So as to the appropriateness or not of vehicles on the beach in terms of the scope of the discussion, I'm not sure that it's entirely relevant. And I respect Council Member Soling's perspective, but I just want to help frame the discussion for the purposes of your recommendation with regards to the proposed amendments. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Why don't we -- you want to respond to Ms. Burgeson's comments and then we'll ask for some comments from the public? How does that sound? Is that okay with the board? Counsel, excuses me. MR. GRABINSR_1: I have r-to -- as tar as Barbara.'s comments are concerned., [ th(,- nytily point I'd like to make as far as her -- December 5, 2001 16J 2 her opinion that keeping this as a permit instead of a notice would allow county staff to place additional conditions as events occur, I -- when you look at the way the current permit structure works, I don't see how the situation would be any different. Right now the permit is an annual permit. It's issued the first week of January, and whatever conditions are on it, which are basically conditions that are mirrored from the Land Development Code, that's what's -- that's what's on the permit. And the hotels may not know what type of cocktail party or beach event they're going to have six or seven or eight months later, and they don't notify county of that until the first of that -- of the month that the beach event occurs. And once they give that notice to county, I guess county, as it stands, could contact the hotel and say, "Well, it looks like you're having amplified music. We want you to also take this precaution," or, "It looks like you may be doing this. We want you to take this precaution." But I don't see how keeping the permit as it stands would increase Collier County staff s ability to place additional conditions or restrictions on beach events. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Comments from the public. Excuse me, Mr. Hill. MR. HILL: Go ahead. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Comments from the public. MS. BURGESON: The first speaker we have scheduled -- or second speaker is Nicole Ryan. MS. RYAN: Good morning. For the record, Nicole Ryan, here on behalf of the Conservancy of Southwest Florida. The Conservancy does not support the proposed LDC amendment language changes. We support the DSAC subcommittee, full committee, Collier County Planning Commission, and Collier County staff in their opposition, and we hope that you will also recommend denial. of this language to the county comm_issiori. Our concern lies in the fact that, in general, a. per ilt allows Page, 1 7 December 5, 20'16J I 2 revocation. A notice does not. Now it's my understanding that the county commission decided to take the -- the revocation ability out of the LDC amendment cycle to see how it worked. That's why it was on an annual basis. They wanted to see if the hotels and condos that swore that they would do it right would do it right, and the results are in. This is a list from Collier County Code Enforcement -- and I have copies for everybody and for the court reporter -- of all of the beach violations. You have pages and pages of beach violations from the turtle season. Some of the violations were before the new LDC amendments went into effect, some were after, but these were all beach violations. And the Conservancy would argue, you need to be stepping towards increased authority to take action on the county level instead of stepping back, and we see this change to a notice as one step back. If you think about it, in the language it talks about a permit, and there's only one sentence, maybe two, that says permits can't be revoked. If you switch all of the permit language to a notice, what if next season's violations are even more than this season? It's going to take a lot more to switch the notice back to a permit. We think that's going in the wrong direction. Thank you. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Thank you. Mr. Cornell. MR. CORNELL: Brad Cornell speaking for Collier County Audubon Society, and I want to, on behalf of the chapter, wholeheartedly support staffs position of not adopting these changes in the LDC. And also I echo what Nicole Ryan has said from the Conservancy. And just to add a point of observation, if -- you know, we had this whole discussion last summer about vehicles on the beach and those -- that whole train of amendment -- amendments to the LDC, and I feel that things did not go the way they should. We should be erring on the side of protecting endangered species, not on_ the side of assisting wit h panties which are going to happen anyway. I think that there's sti tl r oorn to have -- have enteilai►ilineiit -111d partit"S P,I4.-yk`, December 5, 211 6� 2 and services for hotels and our tourists and protect endangered species appropriately. I feel like this kind of retreat from language is not helpful and is very ill- advised. And another -- one more point is that if the hotels feel so confident that they're not going to have violations, what's the big deal about revocation? I think that this seems to be a strange position on their part. So thank you very much. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Thank you, sir. Discussion, Mr. Hill. MR. HILL: Barb, this document, I think you gave it to us, that's the final wording of the proposed -- MS. BURGESON: Yes. That has not changed. MR. HILL: The first thing that strikes me is the impetus is on the -- the notice is provided by the hotel or the private ownership. Okay. There's nothing in here that I see that allows the county to approve those events. MS. BURGESON: Right. Well, it would be -- MR. HILL: Simply a notice by the Ritz - Carlton, for example, that they're going to have these events. MS. BURGESON: Right. It's -- it's still very similar to the way that we have the process right now with the permits; however, there's -- there is no, as -- as Patrick White had opined in his letter of about a week or two ago, there's no way to confirm that we received that and that we reviewed that and concur that those are consistent with the Land Development Code requirements. MR. HILL: Yeah. There's nothing in here that allows the county to respond to that notice. MS. BURGESON: Right. MR. HILL: That alone would recommend, in my mind, to disapprove that. CHAIRMAN SANSB- C.TRY -: ether discussion? Yes, sir, Mr. December 5, 20 1 Soling. 6J 2 MR. SOLING: I'd like our counsel to advise me. On the way the law -- or the way the rule is written, that I understood, even the county and emergency vehicles weren't allowed to operate on the beach except in extreme emergencies; is that correct? MR. WHITE: No. I believe that -- I had this section pointed out before. I thought we'd moved on from the discussion, but there is a provision in 2.6.34 that talks about the prohibition of vehicles on the beach, with limited exceptions. And if you'll give me just a moment, I will find that for you. It is .5.4 which reads (as read) : "Use of vehicles on the beach is prohibited except as might be permitted under sections 3.14.3, 3.14.5 or 3.14.6," which set forth the various exceptions that, in part, pertain to emergency vehicles. There are natural resources folks, there are our own individuals who are on there, as well as the police on a daily basis, and they're all authorized by permit. I believe Mr. Grabinski may have a response to some of the comments that were made. MR. GRABINSKI: Thank you. As -- I just wanted to respond to the comments by Ms. Ryan, because as she stated, the results are in, and I agree. The results are in. And I actually want to thank her for bringing these lists of -- as she refers to them -- beach violations to our attention, because I'll admit and agree that during the month of May and early June there were a lot of instances where chairs and items were found or discovered on the Ritz- Carlton's beach. Does that mean that they were given by -- giving code citations and violations in every instance? No. And the other list that she passed out as -- if you'll note -- it does not just pertain to the Ritz, but it basically pertains to all of the beaches in northern Collier County. Now, again, a lieated issue and an issue tli�it I debated this p�lnel Heavily on last June was whether or riot stiff monetary :Fnes woui-ld be December 5, 211 j, 6J 2 enough of a deterrent for the hotels or whether or not there -- the county needed the ability to revoke the permit. The stiff increase in monetary fines were adopted on June 20th. And if you will look at your sheet, you will note that for the remainder of the four -month turtle season after June 20th there were two days where Collier County Natural Resources noted any materials on the beach in the morning at the hotel. No code violations were ever cited against the Ritz - Carlton subsequent to June 20th. No vehicle -on- the -beach violations ever occurred last sea turtle nesting season. Ed Staros, the general manager of the Ritz - Carlton, stood up on the public record last June and made a commitment to Collier County to instruct his staff and to educate them so that they would not have violations, and I think the record that the Conservancy has brought before you demonstrates that. Again, I would just urge you to remain focused in your discussion. There's a lot of discussion here right now regarding the use of vehicles. This amendment has nothing to do with vehicles. It was a clean -up amendment that the commissioners requested be drafted. Right now the code says that we have a beach - events permit that can't be revoked. They asked me to redraft the language to name that permit that can't be revoked, to turn it into a notice procedure. It's right in the public record in the June 20th minutes, and I invite all of you to go back and read those minutes. It's crystal clear. Thank you. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Thank you, sir. Further comment. Yes, ma'am. MS. SANTORO: I -- I just want to say to the board, we spent hours on the whole area, and I think that going back in perspective, nothing was allowed way back when to protect the turkey -- the turtles -- the sea. turtles. Then the amendments came forward, and there was a -- a relaxing, if you say, to the rules. And I think this board spent hours and hours trying -to come up with penalties and _t''age " December 5, 201 L J 2 revocations to protect the turtles but allowing some use, and it went to the board of commissioners and changed substantially. I would like to move to not accept this notice situation and to support the staff. Again, it's just taking away some of the protection of the county to revoke permits or to have control over the permit situation. I'm very concerned. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. We have a motion. MR. COE: I'd like to second that motion. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Second that motion. Okay. Seconded. Do we have any further discussion? MR. HILL: I'd like to make a comment. Our deliberations and this policy is not directed at the Ritz - Carlton. You seem to say, yes, after -- why Ritz - Carlton was not in violation at all. This is directed towards any agency, hotel, private condominium or -- having beach events. This is not a Ritz - Carlton. My other question for Barb, were permits granted for all of these agencies and locations that are cited on here? MS. BURGESON: There were annual beach - events permits issued and monthly notices given, but I do want to make a couple of statements and corrections to what Matt has just said. One, code enforcement department took a position to be laxed during the beginning of sea turtle nesting season in terms of citing violations. So there were a number of -- of events that weren't formally cited, and that was a policy from that department's administrator or department director to take that -- that more laid -back stance on that to see how the sea turtle nesting season was going to -- to -- to go forward. And the most serious event or violation during sea turtle nesting season happened at the Ritz - Carlton within one week of the Board of County Coninlissioners giving finA approval. And the reason it's not on t ,(A list is I)ectatise it was cited tis a violation of the, C:CSL, variance, ,.- rid t ;a's whtit wtls I)-ahficize(l tt st vetar by the P X141 i ; s12" December 5, 2 0� 1 j 6J 2 Naples Daily News with pictures in the newspaper of two nests at the Ritz with chairs stacked immediately adjacent and touching the riveting on one of those nests. There was no roping around. They had an event scheduled for that night. Alex Solecki and I went out that afternoon. They had -- they had not put up any roping for that event. So if we had not gone out there, brought it to their attention that they had serious violations, that they fixed by the time of the event that evening, it would also have been written up as a code enforcement violation. So that's just to put that on the record. MR. COE: I've got a question, Barb. What authority does the administrator of code enforcement have to disregard or not ticket things like that and to be more lax when all those codes have gone before boards to include the county commissioners that has been approved? Isn't his job to enforce it? MS. BURGESON: At the time, the LDC amendments were in the process of being approved, sent to the state, and come back and been finally adopted, so there's this window in there of about a month and maybe a little bit longer where it's not got that final state approval. So it's kind of a gray area. So that's -- that was the time that -- that the director in that department took that position. MR. COE: Okay. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: We have a motion and a second. Let's -- let's restate the motion so everybody is very clear what the motion says. MS. SANTORO: To not accept this proposed notice and to support staff or turning down this proposal. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Essentially, that is to leave the language as previously passed by this council as is. MS. BURGESON: As previously passed by the Board. of County Commissioners. ('11-AIRMAN SANSB -tj -ICY: Board of County C:'ommis81011(;r-s. Page 13 December 5, 2001 Okay. Favor? (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Hearing none, passed unanimously. MR. SOLING: Mr. Chairman -- CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. 16J 2 MR. SOLING: Just pursue my matter one more time. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay, sir. MR. SOLING: If it's the county, if it's the police, if it's the hotel owners, either way or any way, there's no point in protecting the sea turtles if so much traffic is on the beach. I don't care who is driving vehicles. It was almost like the whole beach was covered with tire tracks. MR. BURGESON: Mr. Soling, one thing you might want to take a look at, the City of Bonita Springs recently approved an ordinance just this year, and it has very strict regulations prohibiting even beach raking during sea turtle nesting season, except for storm events and emergency purposes and limiting the use of vehicles on the beach much -- much more severely than our code does. And if this had been in place when these amendments were proposed, we would have supported this. It probably would have helped not making changes to the code. So it may be something. And also the Community Development Environmental Services Administrator John Dunnuck wanted me to remind this board that if there are issues that staff supports that the board is concerned about or does not support, that this board has the ability to direct staff to make Land Development Code -a endinents. So if there's anything in the future tll< .t. v(. t- wish for its to m. ,ak.e ,J111 endinents to (e Land D(-,weloprnent Code, tliat is aot or yoiir t'ag(j - 2-4 December 5, 2 1 16J 2 ability, but it's written in your -- your ordinance in the Land Development Code as one of your obligations. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Thank you. MR. HILL: Very quick question, Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. MR. HILL: On this list that was presented, I see something like 15 to 20 different locations, Pelican Bay North, those instances noted were not necessarily in violation of a permit grant. They may have been in violation of the code, but they didn't have a permit per se for a beach event. MS. BURGESON: For the most part, I mean, without having Alex here for that, I can't answer that, except from I -- except that I -- from discussions that I've had with Alex, the majority of those did receive permits; however, they were just in violation of their permits. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. MR. COE: I have one more question. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. MR. COE: Were any of these people fined? MS. BURGESON: I couldn't tell you that. We could find out and report back. MR. COE: Yeah. I'd like to find out, yeah. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: It's interesting. There's a car on the beach. How did a car get on the beach? Think about that for a minute, how it got there. Okay. MS. SANTORO: Could I -- CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, ma'am. MS. SANTORO: I mean, we mentioned -- should we put on the agenda to review all the amendments that were passed on the vehicles and permits having to do with sea. turtles at some point? I don't even know if we have a current copy of what was approved by the COMMissloners. Page 25 December 5, 20 1 . 6J Z MS. BURGESON: I can -- I can provide that to you between now and the next meeting. And I did hand out a copy of the Bonita Springs -- City of Bonita Springs ordinance at the beginning of this meeting. So I'll make sure I mail out the copy of the final language that was approved by the board last June 22nd. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Very good. MR. COE: I've got one comment. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Yes, sir. MR. COE: Why don't we -- I don't know if the other members of the board are interested in this. Why don't we ask the staff to pencil whip something that's more strict, something along the lines of what Bonita Springs has done and solve this vehicles -on- the -beach thing right up front. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Has this amendment not already gone through the BOCC? MS. BURGESON: We -- the first one went through last -- last June, and this one is probably scheduled to go before them in February. So it would have to be something that would be done in -- in the next amendment cycle which, I believe, staff has to have initial language in by -- I think it's the end of next month. MR. COE: Could it be done? MS. BURGESON: It could be done, especially using the ordinance that's already been approved by the City of Bonita Springs. MR. COE: What do you think, Chief? CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Only thing I'm saying is, I don't want to get too restrictive because we know, for one, that every morning a staff person goes out there and checks for turtles. We know we have emergency services. We know we have things of that sort. I don't want to -- I mean, Patrick read the code or whatever he was reading over there— dial we've got to have that ability. Now, I (1on't t)elieve that 4iere'4� <AnN/1)o([y out there on the beach. right now December 5, 20f bJ 2 with a ATV that's running up and down the beach other than those folks, except in front of the Ritz or a hotel like that. I don't know if we're not trying to be over restrictive here, but we got to let our folks get out there to do enforcement. Have we had any instances, aware of any instance of somebody out on the beach with an ATV that wasn't related to just working at the Ritz, somebody illegally out on the beach? MS. BURGESON: During sea turtle nesting season, which I think is the big issue here, we do have the natural resources department. They typically do one -- one trip up the beach each morning, emergency patrol may be on the beach each day, but typically not each day at each section of the beach in Collier County, and then the only other vehicles that are on the beach are the hotels for their events throughout the summer. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: State people like DEP and people like that don't ever go -- have vehicles on the beach? MS. BURGESON: Not routinely, not -- not on a daily basis, just on an as- needed basis, if there's an emergency or after a storm event. Then they typically go out to monitor what the results of that storm is. The ordinance that was adopted by the City of Bonita Springs does allow emergency. It does allow natural resources, does allow environmental work during sea turtle nesting season. So it's not a -- it's not more prohibitive than we were prior to this last amendment cycle. It is probably very similar to where we were, but it ties it down. MR. COE: Also, they don't have the amount of hotels and condos that we have. Their beach area is much less than what we have. MS. BURGESON: That's right. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: What's your pleasure? MR. CARLSON: I'm not ready to make a recommendation 611. I Page '27 December 5, 2001 read this. 16J 2 CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Let's take a look at it next time. Okay. What are we doing next? MS. BURGESON: That's the last item on the agenda. The wetland policy review discussion is not being -- we did not have anything else new to tell you at this point on how that's proceeding. And then if there's any subcommittee discussions -- I'm not sure about that, if somebody has a brief presentation or Bill. MS. SANTORO: I've been trying to have somebody come and speak to us about panthers, and Jim Beaver is in the environmental service section, and he would be glad to come. Now, I wanted to be sure I knew when the next meeting was to try to schedule. He had some dates in December, but Barbara and I thought we would try and do it at a regular meeting. Is our next meeting, the day, January 2nd? I wanted to be sure. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: I'm just wondering if there's not someone out with the -- who runs the panther preserve, the Feds or the state? MR. CARLSON: Feds. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Is there not someone we could contact out there that actually is a hands -on guy to come talk to us about it? MS. SANTORO: I've asked Darryl Land, Mark Lott, David Shindle and finally sent me to Jim Beaver. MS. BURGESON: Jim Beaver is really the expert in the area. I mean, you can certainly get someone that works with the panther preserve, but he has the experience and the knowledge for this area in Southwest Florida for probably 20 years at least and maybe more so than the people that work at the panther preserve, which is much younger than ffint. December 5, 20"� 1 J 1 � 2 CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: I think our workshop we had on wetlands was very informative, and I would look forward to doing that on panthers also. MS. SANTORO: I just want to confirm our meeting since it's the day after New Year's Day. MS. BURGESON: That is the date, January 2nd. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Yes, sir. MR. LORENZ: For the record, Bill Lorenz, natural resources director. We'd just like to -- we haven't finalized our schedule. We're coming to the point where we will be having a transmittal hearing to the Board of County Commissioners on all the Growth Management Plan amendments. That is targeted for the end of February. We will be coming to the Environmental Advisory Council here in January to schedule a -- what I would recommend is a special meeting to handle all of the Growth Management Plan amendments that you will be responsible to review prior to the planning commission's meeting. We have been -- of course, we have been working with the subcommittee, your growth management subcommittee, and they have been receiving all of the drafts that we've been developing for them for the rural fringe advisory committee. At some particular point we will need to calendar some more time with the subcommittee to bring the subcommittee up to speed on all the details, but I would remind the council, that if you want to do it at the -- at the -- during the -- your meeting on the 2nd, that we probably have our schedules finalized enough to be able to try to get you to schedule a separate meeting. Of course, your other option is, you could simply have the -- have your meeting, I guess, on the first meeting in February, but I guess I'm telling you that it's going to be a very long meeting with a lot of material, a lot of issues. So I would Suggest that you think about having some additional meetings Page - December 5, 2 Ol .. somewhere in between or at the recommendation s of your 6J subcommittee. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. Yes, sir. Mr. Cornell. MR. CORNELL: Is it appropriate to make a public comment right now? CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: It certainly is, sir. MR. CORNELL: Okay. Thank you. Brad Cornell with Collier County Audubon Society. I just want to bring to your attention that the rural lands committee, you know, in this rural assessment process, has gone through their first scenario in looking at ways to protect resources and agriculture, et cetera, in the rural, our eastern parts of the county. I wanted to bring to your attention that they're looking for input, and I would say that this would be through Bob Mulhere and staff on what the -- how to frame the second scenario. They're going to come up with at least three scenarios, if not more, through this committee. The first one is an incentive -based transfer of development rights type of program. It's entirely incentive -based with no outside money being brought in from any other sources. Scenario No. 2 is up in the air, and I would say that you -all may have some opinions about that, and that if you do, either individually or collectively, you might want to forward those to Bob Mulhere who is the liaison with that board. And some of the things that you might consider would be to introduce sending and receiving areas, if you know those concepts in this transfer of development rights type of discussion, to base those kinds of areas on the data that they've actually collected in that study, rather than to have it be sort of determined on a per- project basis. So just something to think about, but I would encourage you to tnaybe offer some ideas. Thank you. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Thatik you, sir. _h,1'q t.° ? ( ) December 5, 2001 16J 2 Any other comments from counsel? MR. COE: We might want to consider scheduling, and we could do it probably in January when we meet again, but we might want to schedule a workshop where we can have Ali or, you know, somebody from this group. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Rural end. MR. COE: And just get them to bring us up to speed here, because I feel like I'm going to get hit with a freight train very rapidly, and I'd like to kind of absorb it slowly. I'm no Ph.D. In environment, so it takes me awhile to study this stuff. And maybe if we can get a presentation from them and get our hands on it so we know what it is -- CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Bill, who would you suggest? Would you suggest asking Bob to come to us and give a presentation? MR. COE: We could have Ed do it. Ed, are you up to speed on all this? No. MR. LORENZ: Well, certainly -- Bill Lorenz, natural resources director. Of course, the rural fringe work is coming to you very fast, and that's what the subcommittee has worked -- has been working with. But what Brad was speaking about was the rural lands committee and that is -- that time frame is November of 2002, if I think -- if I remember the schedule right, that we're going to have amendments effective. So if you want to have -- if you want to have a -- a -- somewhat of a workshop with staff, certainly Bob Mulhere is our -- you remember, Bob worked for staff. He is now a consultant. He has been hired by the county as kind of our growth management consultant. So he's an extension of staff -- that Bob Mulhere or myself could give you a presentation on where we are in both efforts. If, on the other hand, you would like to have your advisory comai.ittee to -- to -- I mean, your -- excuse me, your sLII)commit�tee Page, 3[ 16J 2 December 5, 2001 to work you through, because that was another -- another request, we can arrange that as well. But on staff I would certainly have -- Bob Mulhere would be able to work you through some overview. MS. SANTORO: The rural lands, I think we -- none of us know exactly what's going on. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: A lot further off than the rural fringe. MS. SANTORO: Yes. Yes. Eastern lands. And the rural fringe the subcommittee has been working with, so we can do it either way. MR. CARLSON: I believe the rural fringe got an extension, didn't they? MR. LORENZ: It's an extension in the sense that -- well, put it this way: We will -- our schedule for the rural -- did you say rural fringe, Ed? I'm sorry. Where the rural fringe is we will have adopted amendments by June of 2002, June 22nd, 2002. Remember, we have to go through a transmittal hearing process, a state review and then an adoption process. So we will adopt amendments by June 2002. There is a slight extension in the, sense that the amendments won't necessarily be effective at that particular point because then the state has to go through some public- notice requirements. So to that degree, we have an extension, but we're still in a very tight time frame for the rural fringe. The rural lands has been extended, but they are now getting into some -- what I would consider some very meaty and weighty issues, which I think Brad's comment is probably appropriate, that you may want to start to begin taking a little bit of a look at what they're doing there as well. My concerti always is just prioritizing workload and where we are on. t he schedule, and I can tell you that the ITtral fringe tnaterial is a -- is a lot. It's very complex. It's very interret te(l. Thy °re ,,-re , lot of k -ey � ��c��pts, -iron. we will be britigir14-j I0111 ); >') December '106 J 0 2 amendment language that could very easily be 40 or 50 pages of -- of actual policy language, not to -- and then the supporting material could very well be 100, 150 pages of maps, tables, charts, graphs, et cetera, et cetera. Your subcommittee has been working pretty good in coming up with some speed. We kind of have a little bit of a time lag here with the November holidays but certainly -- you know, as staff, we can provide you a workshop, and I can get Bob Mulhere together with you, and -- and that's your pleasure. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Sounds good. MR. COE: How long would it take to do that? Hour maybe? MR. LORENZ: Yeah. I would think to cover all the material, I was going to say, without any questions, to kind of walk you through all the key points and where we're headed, probably be a good -- good 40 to 60 minutes on a presentation to walk you through everything. MR. COE: I'm for it. CHAIRMAN SANSBURY: Okay. All right. Any other discussion? We're adjourned. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 10:03 a.m. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL THOMAS W. SANSBURY, CHAIRMAN Pa e 33 16J December 5, 2001 2 TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF DONOVAN COURT REPORTING, INC., BY CAROLYN J. FORD Vanderbilt Beach Mosel.u. .Advisory Committee 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Naples FL 34104 February 7, 2002 AGENDA L CALL MEETING TO ORDER: II. ATTENDANCE: ✓� J Fiala --- Carter Henning Coyle Colett — 6 . III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Meeting January 10, 2002 IV. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT: A. Budget Report B. V. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT: VI. OLD BUSINESS: A. Discuss slowing traffic down on Vanderbilt Dr. B. Sidewalk on East Side of Gulf Shore Blvd. C. Review of Wilson Miller Report D. List from County of other areas to view for Beautification & Traffic ideas. VII. NEW BUSINESS: A. Up -dated Expenditures on Budgeted items B. Detailed break -down of items budgeted under MSTU C. List of specific items generated by County that Committee can work on. D. List of items that County is required to pay for under the taxes paid by the Constituents other than the MSTU VIII. PUBLIC COMMENTS: 14isc. Corres: / IX. ADJOURNMENT Date: Itc A:# 1(_0 S I The next meeting is scheduled for 2:30 PM, March 71h, 2002 Gt,r:.cs To: PLACE TO BE DETERMINED 16J 2 VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD M.S.T.U. ADVISORY COMMITTEE 2705 HORSESHOE DRIVE SOUTH NAPLES, FL MINUTES Chairman Frank Halas called the meeting to order at 4:11 PM. ATTENDANCE: Members: Alvin (Bud) Martin, Carol Wright, Dick Lydon, B.J. Savard- Boyer, and Frank Halas Collier County: Bob Petersen, Val Prince, Mike Levy, and Ed Kant Others: Robert Kinderlan, President - Commercial Land Maintenance, Sue Chapin, And Manpower Secretarial Services At this time Ed Kant excused himself. Frank started discussion with asking Committee for ideas for the Committee itself. Discussion followed concerning parks, parking lots, and the parks department. Bob mentioned the County does not use the red mulch that is currently being used by others. MAINTENANCE ISSUES & REPORTS Bob and Val discussed Private Contractors, Vendors, and Bid processes. Frank wanted to brainstorm about Gulf Shore Drive & slowing the traffic down. Frank asked Bud Martin if narrowing of the road on Gulf Shore Blvd. had slowed the traffic down on the road. Bud mentioned he didn't think the lanes were too narrow; the bike paths are not wide enough. Bob said those were things that they can discuss & work on in the future. Frank said Vanderbilt Drive is another area of concern. Speed & traffic lanes seem to be some of the problems the Committee will address. Frank would like the Committee to address ideas that the group needs to initiate. (Val passed out an Executive Summary) (ATTACHED) 16.1 2 Bob mentioned that the MSTU Committees are for enhancement & not things that the County should be doing or paying for. Discussion followed concerning improvements, parking, traffic circles, sod, easements and sidewalks. Bob mentioned the Chairman could appoint a committee to look into particular item & report back. The Committee asked the County to get information on sidewalk on East Side of Gulf Shore Drive. Frank also asked the Committee person that has the Wilson Miller Report to bring to the next meeting and also jot done some thoughts with a list of things the Committee feels important for this MSTU. Bob would make copies of the Report before the next meeting & get to all Committees members for them to study. Bud asked if Bob could also get them a list of places they can look at - for ideas such as Beautification /Traffic /etc. Bob will also request Mr. Morrison, Traffic Engineer to meet with the Committee at a future date. It was discussed & decided to E -mail the minutes, agendas, & reminders of futures meetings only. No need to mail at this time unless there is a handout or other information that the Committee needs to receive. The meetings will be held on the I' Thursdays of the month at 2:30 PM. The location is to be determined. As soon as a place is decided upon, Sue will E -mail the location to all members. The next meeting will be February 7, 2002. Dick brought up the subject of a bench along Gulf Shore Dr. on a corner & wondered if anyone had any information on it. After some discussion, Dick moved that the Vanderbilt Beach Property Owners Association donate benches to the community and not be part of the MSTU expenses, other than the up -keep after installation. Seconded Carol Wright, Carried unanimously. Bob then said the Committee has to create an Executive Summary & have Board approval. Seeing no further business, Dick moved for adjournment, seconded Carol, meeting adjourned at 4:40 PM. The next meeting is scheduled for 2:30 PM, Thursday, February 7, 2002 Place to be determined. 2 16J 2 VANDERBILT BEACH BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE M.S.T.U. ORIENTATION /ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING JANUARY 10, 2002,3:00 pm ATTENDANCE: Members: Alvin (Bud) Martin, Carol Wright, Dick Lydon, B.J. Savard- Boyer, & Frank Halas Collier County: Bob Peterson, Val Prince, Mike Levy, Ed Kant Others: Robert Kinderlan, President - Commercial Land Maintenance, & Sue Chapin, Manpower Secretarial Services 1. Bob Petersen/Project Manager Landscape Operations Section/Transportation Operations Dept called meeting to order. 2. He introduced himself & explained that these are public meetings and if any changes are made they are to be made 48 hours in advance. a. He introduced other County Staff present. b. Individual County Staff Members introduced themselves & told the committee what their particular duties are. They reminded the Committee that they are there to answer any questions they may have. Members present were: Val Prince — Project Mgr./ Landscape Operations Section. Mike Levy — Administrative Secretary/Landscape Operations Section Ed Kant — Transportation Operations Director Ed mentioned that Bob Petersen is an excellent horticulturist — trained & very knowledgeable. Val Prince has been involved in M.S.T.U.'s since it's inception & all the maintenance of what works & what doesn't. Mr. Kant stated they have a staff with very good expertise in their fields. The committee has a lot of latitude & flexibility & the biggest issue that they will have to contend with is that some things may sound illogical and because of the laws of Florida & Sunshine Laws, may be a bit cumbersome, but will be able to deal with them. One of the first series of issues the Committee will have to deal with will be; what will the monies be spent on. There are some existing improvements out there, & they will need to decide what they will do to maintain, and /or upgrade them with some commitments already being made at time the MSTU was formed. In the next few months Mr. Kant suggested the Committee take a look at, and discuss other projects, whether they be MSTU projects or not, to get an idea of what is liked, and something that will last for the next 20 -30 years along with costs. An 16J 2 important date for the committee to remember will be this summer when the County has to go to the Board with the proposed millage for next fiscal year when the tax assessor gives his estimate that goes into the September Budget Meetings. A little bit of money has already been spent for the refurbishment & the ongoing maintenance of the Vanderbilt Drive improvements & that will have to be figured into whatever the Committee wants to do with the new monies that will be coming in. The Committee is under no obligation to expand or do anything other than what is in the best interest of the MSTU, whether maintaining Vanderbilt Drive or adding to other areas within the district. The district boundaries can be changed, which requires an ordinance revision. Weather the cap is raised or the boundaries are changed would require two board meetings & several months, so want to set a cap high enough that County wouldn't have to change. A half mil cap is there to get started & can be changed if needed within reason & approval through proper channels. c. At this time the Committee Members introduced themselves. The two Contractors introduced themselves: Sue Chapin/Manpower Secretarial Services and Robert Kinderlan /President - Commercial Land Maintenance. 3. Bob Petersen went over the handouts — a. ORDINANCE NO. 2001 -43 b. SUNSHINE LAW INFORMATION — (Meeting 9:30- 11:00- 1 /10 /02) c. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SHEETS - (missing pages will be sent to Committee persons with Minutes) d. AN AGENDA & MINUTES from other MSTU Committees, (Committee was informed the minutes will not be verbatim & can be in any format they wish). e. BUDGET SHEET— which was explained to Committee & also how the Purchase Orders are paid. A Revenue Sheet will also be given- noted that there will be Revenues towards the end of the year. Every month the Committee will be given an Expenditure & Revenue Budget Sheet. An Invoice Log along with other misc. sheets were given for review & understanding. (ALL THE ABOVE HANDOUTS ATTACHED) It was noted that everything discussed and given out is public. Bob explained that if any Committee member has or sees a problem to call any one them. 2 16J 2 The Committee will consist of 5 members. If the Committee felt it was in the best interest of the District to have more members, it can by done by having the Ordinance Amended. The Chairman will run the meetings & work with the Secretary from Manpower to go over Minutes & Agendas. Meetings are run by "Roberts Rules of Order ", a Quorum is needed, and if a member has 3 "unexcused" absences, is cause to have that member replaced. If you are not going to be at a meeting, please call Ed, Bob or Pam so they are aware of your absence. Committees usually meet once a month or more if needed. When elections are taken, the Committee will decide location of meetings, times, how often to meet, and when. Meetings must held in a public place. 4. NOMINATIONS & ELECTIONS OF CHAIRMAN & VICE CHAIRMAN: Nominations are open for Chairman — Alvin (Bud) Martin nominated Frank Halas for President — seconded by B.J. Savard -Boyer Frank Halas nominated Alvin (Bud) Martin for President — seconded by B.J. Savard- Boyer. Nominations were closed. A show of hands was for Frank Halas — 3 a show of hands for Alvin (Bud) — 2 Frank Hales is President Nominations open for Vice Chairman — Frank Halas nominated Dick Lydon — seconded by B.J. Savard- Boyer. Nominations were closed. A show of hands for Dick Lydon 4 -1. Dick Lydon is Vice Chairman 5. MEETING TURNED OVER TO CHAIRMAN: a. Bob Peterson then closed this portion of the meeting at 4:10 PM & asked Chairman Halas to now open the Vanderbilt Beach Road MSTU Advisory Committee meeting. [c3 16.1 2 VANDERBILT BEACH MSTU BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATION TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS DEPT. 2705 Horseshoe Drive South Bob Petersen, DOT Naples, FL 34104 Project Mgr. Landscape Operations January 27, 2002 2705 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 35104 (941) 774 -8494 (0) 659- 5787(F) VOTING MEMBERS E -mail - bobpetersen c ,collier og v.net B.J.Savard -Boyer Michael Levy, DOT 479 Palm Ct. Landscape Operations /Adm. Secretary Naples, FL 34104 2705 South Horseshoe Drive (941) 594 -1977 (H) Naples, FL 34104 594 -1977 (F) (Call first) (941) 774 -8494 (0) E -Mail - Palm47 a,MSN.Com 659 -5787 (F) E -mail - michellevy t colliergov.net Frank Halas - Chairman Edward J. Kant, PE 405 Flamingo Ave. Transportation Operations Director Naples, FL 34108 2705 South Horseshoe Drive (941) 592 -9969 (H) Naples, FL 34104 592 -0872 (F) (941) 774 -8494 (0) E- Mail - Fhalas a,Home.Com 659 -5787 (F) Dick Lydon - Vice Chairman E -mail - edkant2ccolliergov.net 450 Tradewinds Ave. Naples, FL 34108 Pamela Lulich, DOT (941) 597 -2746 (H) Landscape Operations Manager E -Mail - Dlydon 124 @aol.com 2705 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 A.D. (Bud) Martin (941) 774 -8494 (0) 9790 Gulfshore Dr. 4306 659 -5787 (F) Naples, FL 34108 E -mail - pamlulichg( collier o. (941) 514 -3007 (H) E -mail - Bud.martlll@att.net Val Prince Carol Wright Project Mgr. Landscape Operations 9362 Gulfshore Dr. 2705 South Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34108 Naples, FL 34104 (941) 597 -9503 (H) (941) 774 -8494 (0) 514 -3335 (F) 659 -5787 (F) E -mail -Lhwri t7@bome.com 734 -0109 (Cell) E -mail - valprince(c_kollier 7o, v.net 16;1 2 Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners Bldg. "F ", 3`d Floor 3301 Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 (941)774 - 8097(0) 774- 3602(F) i Invoice Log Immokalee Road MSTD Fiscal Year 01 -02 Vendor/ Contractor: Commercial Land Maintenance Fund Number: 111 - 163646- 634999 Vanderbilt Dr Grounds Maintenance PO #: 200446 1011/01 1�J z Invoice Date Description of Services / Materials Adjustments Invoice Amt Balance on PO 1- Oct -01 Grounds Maintenance $43,755.25 21- Oct -01 Inv #994503 Oct. Maintenance Services $4,018.00 $39,737.25 28- Nov -01 Inv # 994760 Nov. Maintenance Services $2,885.00 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,8542.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 $36,852.25 Totals to Date $0.00 $6,903.00 ;o4,5,756.26 i Invoice Log Immokalee Road MSTD Fiscal Year 01 -02 Vendor / Contractor: Commercial Land Maintenance PO # : 200446 10/1101 Fund Number: 111-163646-634999 Vanderbilt Dr Contract Incidentals Invoice Date Description of Services / Materials Adjustments Invoice Amt Balance on PO Contract Incidentals 7- Nov -01 Inv # 994476 Irr. Repairs 9 /Oct/01 23- Oct -01 Inv # 994510 Irr. Re airs and Parts 15 /Oct/01 11- Oct -01 Inv # 994565 Irr. Repairs 28/Oct/01 27- Nov -01 Inv # 994740 Irr. Repairs 21 /Nov /01 Totals to Date 7!!!1 $20,000.00 $288.00 $19,712.00 $164.66 $19,547.34 $84.00 $19,463.34 $63.00 $19,400.34 $19,400.34 $19,400.34 $19,400.34 $19,400.34 $19,400.34 $19,400.34 $19,400.34 $19,400.34 $19,400.34 $19,400.34 $19,400.34 $19,400.34 $19,400.34 $19,400.34 $19,400.34 $19,400.34 .00 $599.66 .00 16J 2 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PURCHASING DEPARTMENT 3301 EAST TAMIAMT TRAIL SUPPORT SERVICES DIVISION PURCHASING BUILDING NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8425 FAX (941) 732-0844 .......... I........ http://co.collier.fl.us DATE: July 10, 2001 TO: Prospective Bidders FROM: Lyn M. Wood, C.P.M. Public Utilities Purchasing Agent RE: BID #01- 3258 -- "Vanderbilt Drive Beautification Area Grounds Maintenance" The Board of County Commissioners, Transportation Operations Department, desires to receive proposals for the above - referenced services. Please refer to the Public Notice contained in the enclosed proposal package for the time and date of the Pre -bid Conference and the Opening of this Bid. If you have any immediate questions regarding the specifications or intended work, you may contact Val Prince, Transportation Operations Department at 9411774 -8494. If you have procedural questions, you may contact me at 941/732 -2667 or by e -mail at LynWoodOcolliergov. net. We look forward to your participation in this bid process. cc: Val Prince, Transportation Operations NOTE: If you choose to bid, please submit an ORIGINAL and ONE COPY of your proposal pages. 16J 2 BidNo. 01 -3258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance Page -7 VANDERBILT DRIVE BEAUTIFICATION AREA GROUNDS MAINTENANCE SPECIFICATIONS These specifications are intended to provide the information by which prospective bidders may understand the minimum requirements of Collier County relative to entering into a Contract to furnish and deliver to the Vanderbilt Drive Beautification Area, grounds maintenance for the road right -of way and selected public areas. SCOPE OF WORK The work covered by this Contract requires a weekly servicing of all Areas which consist of furnishing all labor, equipment, materials and services necessary to satisfactorily perform grounds maintenance, as determined by the Contract Manager or the designated Owner's Representative as follows: LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION OF WORK AREAS The areas of work included in these specifications are located as described below and as shown on the plans attached to these specifications: A. Area No. 1 Those areas where curbing, landscaping and irrigation systems have been installed to date, being located as follows: 1. The west right of way of Vanderbilt Drive — Vanderbilt Beach Road to Bluebill Ave. /111 "' Ave. including side street radii. 2. An area on the north right of way of Vanderbilt Beach Road and west of Vanderbilt Beach Drive to Launch Circle. B. Area No. 2 Those areas which contain limited landscaping material and no irrigation system. 1. Area No. 2 is not applicable in this grounds maintenance segment. 16J 2 Bid No. 0 1-3 258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance Page -8 L BASIC MAINTENANCE FUNCTIONS A. MOWING AND EDGING Mowing and edging shall include medians as well as those areas, if existing, along the outside edge of the sidewalks of adjacent properties that are not currently maintained by the property Owners. All turf shall be mowed with mulching type mower equipment to eliminate the need to bag and transport grass clippings. Should bagging be necessary, the bagged clippings shall be collected and removed at no additional cost. Grass shall be cut at a height of three and one half inches (3 '/2 "). The frequency of cutting will be weekly or fifty -two (52) times for Work Area No. 1. The number of mowings may be modified by the Contract Manager or by seasonal weather conditions at the Contract Manager's discretion. The Contractor shall use or alternate mowing practices, patterns or equipment within narrow turf areas so not to create wheel ruts or worn areas in the turf. Any areas of turf that become water soaked during the period of this Contract shall be mowed with twenty -one inch (21" + / -) diameter hand walk behind type mowers to prevent wheel ruts in the turf caused by heavier type self - propelled rider mowers. The Contractor shall be responsible for repairing any ruts caused by their mowers at no additional costs to the County. Mechanical edging of the turf shall be done with each mowing along all sidewalk edges, back of concrete curbs, around all plant beds, utility service boxes, street light bases, sign posts, headwalls, guardrails, timer pedestals, posts and trees. Metal blade edging is not permitted along plant bed and turf edges. Mechanical metal blade edging is permitted along back of curbing. Grass root runners extending into the mulched areas shall be cut and removed when the edging is performed. Edging will also be required in all turf areas around isolated trees, sprinkler heads, valve boxes, shrubs, sign posts, manholes, etc. where they exist. All debris on streets, sidewalks or other areas resulting from edging shall be removed. No herbicide shall be used for edging. All sidewalks, curbing and/or gutters including a four -foot (4') area from the face of the curb and sidewalk areas shall be cleaned after each service. All sidewalks shall be blown clean, but no clippings or other debris shall be blown or allowed to be deposited on other adjacent property or accumulate on right -of -way areas. B. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS Conventional Pop -up and Subsurface Irrigation Systems The irrigation systems within Work Area No. 1 shall be checked and repaired as necessary. Each zone shall be manually turned on at the valve once a week and a thorough inspection conducted to ascertain proper operation of the system. Quick coupling valves, if existing, shall be reviewed weekly and operated quarterly to insure proper operation. Maintenance responsibilities will include cleaning and adjustment of heads, nozzles, valve boxes and valves filters to insure proper coverage, review of filters and backflow preventers, replacement of heads and nozzles, installation or replacement of risers, repair of minor PVC piping breaks or subsurface piping or restricted sprinkler 16J Z Bid No. 01 -3258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance Page -y lines, replacement of damaged valve boxes /lids and adjustment of controllers and rain shutoff switches for settings and operation. Major repairs to the sprinkler system including repair of valves, mainlines, time - clocks, damage by vehicles or electrical wiring problems will be considered as additional expenses to the Contract. These additional expenses shall be charged as a time and material billing. Prior to proceeding with the work, the Contract Manager must approve all additional expenses. The Contractor shall maintain the County supplied reclaimed water irrigation signage. Cost to install replacement signs shall be considered additional services and be billed on a time and material basis. C. WEEDING Weeding of plant beds, sidewalks, guardrails bases and curb joints and other mulched areas by chemical and/or hand removal will be performed weekly or as necessary to provide a weed free and well maintained area. D. GENERAL SITE PRUNING General site pruning shall be defined as the pruning of any plant's foliage below a ten -foot (10') level. All groundcovers, shrubs, canopy trees and palms up to a ten foot (1.0') level, shall be inspected and pruned on a weekly or an as needed basis, to maintain the proper or required heights for visibility, vehicular movement purposes and desired shape or form as determined by the Contract Manager or the Owner's Representative. Pruning shall also include removal of water sprouts, suckers and any dead or diseased foliage or branches. During the first weeks of October and April, ornamental grasses, such as Fountain grass, Florida Gama or Fakahatchee grass shall be pruned in a pyramid shape to a twelve inch (12 ") or twenty -four inch (24 ") height based upon the type of plant. Ornamental type grasses such as Liriope muscari `Evergreen giant', shall only be pruned at the direction and approval of the Contract Manager or Owner's Representative. Plant material with a canopy over pedestrian or sidewalks shall be maintained at a minimum height of one hundred twenty inches (120 "). Shrubs and groundcovers adjacent to pathways or sidewalks shall be pruned to maintain one foot (1') of clearance from the edge of the pathway. It is recommended that adjacent shrubs and groundcovers be maintained so that they angle or are rounded away from the pathway. 16J 2 Bid No. 0 1-3 258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance`- Page 10 E. TRASH REMOVAL Work Area No. 1 With each service, all site areas shall be cleaned by removing all trash or debris to include, but not be limited to, paper, bottles, cans, other trash, and horticultural debris. All debris or trash pick -up shall be performed "prior" to mowing in all turf areas. The disposal of all trash and debris must be at a proper landfill or disposal site. All disposal fees, tipping or charges are to be included in the Contract Proposal Price. F. STREET CLEANING /SWEEPING Street Cleaning A four -foot (4') wide area measured from the face of the curb and gutters including turn lanes shall be cleaned with each site service to remove any accumulation of debris or objectionable growth so to maintain a neat and safe condition. Street Sweeping with Mobile Vacuum Equipment (Alternate) A mobile self - contained vacuum sweeper, equipped with bottom, side and edge brushes; including a water spraying system to reduce dust, is a minimum requirement to perform the street sweeping function. All debris collected must be dumped at a proper landfill or disposal site. Photo(s) and /or manufacturers brochure with specifications of this equipment (either owned or subcontracted) must be supplied with this Bid - Submittal. G. TRAFFIC CONTROL The Contractor shall comply with the requirements of Collier County's Maintenance of Traffic (MOT) Policy, copies of which are available through the Risk Management or Purchasing Department. The Contractor shall obtain and review the County MOT policy requirements prior to submitting a bid. The Contractor will be responsible for obtaining copies of all required manuals, MUTCD, FDOT Roadway & Traffic Design Standards Indexes, or other related documents, in order to become familiar with their requirements. Strict adherence to the requirements of the MOT policy will be enforced under this Contract. To assist in employee visibility; approved bright day -glow red /orange colored safety vests shall be worn by employees when servicing the area. A directional lighted and flashing arrow board will be required under this Contract that meets the traffic control requirements. 1FJ 2 Bid No. 01 -3258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance -- Page 11 H. GENERAL MAINTENANCE REPORT SHEETS The Contractor shall complete the "General Maintenance Report Sheets" on a weekly basis and then sign and submit on a monthly basis to the Owner's appointed representative for review and approval as to completeness. The General Maintenance Report Sheets are required to be signed by the Contractor and submitted prior to monthly billing and payment. The Contractor will also be required to conduct on -site inspections with the Contract Manager or Owner's Representative on a monthly basis to verify satisfactory completion of Contract requirements. The original forms for the report sheets will be provided to the Contractor for reproduction purposes. I. MISCELLANEOUS MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES 1. If plants, shrubs, trees, grass or foliage die due to neglect or damage by the Contractor, Contractor's employees or a Subcontractor as determined by the Contract Manager or Owner's Representative, they shall be replaced at the Contractor's expense. 2. The Contractor shall provide ramps or other devices to gain access over the curb to all medians. The curb or turf areas shall not be damaged due to gaining access or they will be replaced at the Contractor's expense. 3. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to notify the Contract Manager of any maintenance problems or additional maintenance needs. 4. Should additional costs be involved which are not covered within the Contract Specifications, a Unit Cost shall be agreed to by the Contractor and Contract Manager prior to performing additional services. 5. The Contractor shall perform inspections on all plants, shrubs, trees and grass areas for disease or insect infestation during each week's service to the site. The Contractor shall immediately notify the Contract Manager should. a disease or infestation be found and begin appropriate treatment per the Contract requirements. 6. The Contractor shall have radio, cellular phone and/or beeper equipment for on -site and off site communication in order to communicate with the Contract Manager. J. CREW SIZE/MAN -HOURS Contractor shall provide a minimum crew size of four (4) personnel with each weekly service of the work areas. The Bidder shall provide in the Contract Proposal the estimated number of on -site man- hours per week the Contractor will be providing to satisfactorily perform the requirements of this Contract. 16J Z Bid'No. 0 1-3 25 8 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance Page 12 K. ACCIDENTS OR THEFTS The Contractor shall be responsible each week to contact the Contract Manager to report any accidents or thefts involving or occurring within the areas covered by this Contract. The Contractor shall photograph the damage or loss and provide that photo the Contract manager at no additional costs. Should assistance be requested by law enforcement, emergency personnel or others, the costs shall be included in the Contract unless otherwise approved by the Contract Manager. L. RESPONSE TIMES On a twenty -four (24) hour basis, the Contractor may be required to travel to the site immediately to meet with the Contract Manager, law enforcement or emergency personnel to resolve an emergency. The Contractor shall respond to a telephone, beeper, or radio call within one (1) hour. There shall be no additional charge for these responses. M. NON - PERFORMANCE In the event the Contractor fails to perform any required services within the time schedules set forth under this Contract, the County reserves the right to obtain substitute performance. Further the County reserves the right to deduct the cost of such performance from the Contractor's monthly payments. The Contractor may be exempt from this provision if such exemption is granted by the Contract Manager in writing, prior to any delays or as a result of an Act of Nature. The Contract Manager reserves the right to deduct portions of the monthly invoiced amount for items not completed within the expressed time frame, even if the County did not obtain substitute performance. These funds will be forfeited by the Contractor. Further, the County reserves the right to deduct the cost of such performance from the Contractor's monthly pay request. The County may also deduct or charge the Contractor for services or items necessary to correct the deficiencies directly related to the Contractor's non - performance. N. CONTRACT PERIOD This Contract shall commence upon receipt of a "Notice to Proceed" letter from the Contract Manager, and will remain in effect until September 30, 2002. O. RENEWAL TERMS This Contract may be renewed at the option of the County, with the consent of the Contractor, on an annual basis for two (2) additional one (1) year periods. Increases for the renewal periods shall be requested in writing by the Contractor and shall not exceed the Consumer Price Index (CPI) for the previous twelve (12) month period. 16J 2 Bid No. 01 -3258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance. Page 13 P. CONTRACT TERMINATION The Contractor agrees the County /Contract Manager shall be sole judge of non- performance. Should the Contractor be found to have failed to perform his services in a manner satisfactory to the County as per the Contract and Specifications or for any of the following points, the County may terminate this Contract immediately: 1. Inability for any reason, of the Contractor to perform requested service requirements. 2. Work that is not performed on a level consistent with the industry standards. 3. Services not rendered within a reasonable time after notification by the Contract Manager. 4. Non - compliance with any portion of this Contract. 5. Immediately for cause. 6. The County may also terminate this Contract for convenience with a seven (7) day written notice. Q. CONTRACTOR'S EMPLOYEES Employees of the Contractor shall be properly uniformed and provide a neat appearance. All employees of the Contractor shall be considered to be at all times the sole employees of the Contractor under his sole direction and not an employee or agent of Collier County. The Contractor shall supply competent and physically capable employees and Collier County may require the Contractor to remove an employee it deems careless, incompetent, insubordinate, or otherwise objectionable and whose continued contract site services involvement is not in the best interest of the County. R. CONTRACTOR'S MEETING ATTENDANCE During the Contract Period, the Contract Manager or Advisory Committee, if applicable, may have questions concerning maintenance issues. The Contractor shall be required to attend monthly meetings and other special meetings that the Contract Manager may require. There shall be no additional charge for attendance at these meetings. If the Contractor fails to attend the monthly meetings without an excused absence, an amount equal to two (2) hours of the supervision labor rate as listed on the Proposal Page shall be deducted from the monthly billing of the Contractor against the Contract total. 16J 2 Bid -No. 01 -3258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance Page .14 S. BILLING Upon the completion of each month's work, payment requests shall be submitted to the Contract Manager on a monthly basis by the Contractor for services rendered for the prior month. Invoices shall not reflect sales tax. After review and approval, the invoice will be transmitted to the Finance Department for payment. Payment will be made upon receipt of a proper invoice and in compliance with Section 218.70 Florida Statutes, otherwise known as the "Florida Prompt Payment Act." Collier County reserves the right to withhold and/or reduce an appropriate amount of any payments for work not performed or for unsatisfactory performance of Contractual requirements. T. METHOD OF AWARD The general criteria that will be used for the evaluation of this Bid is set forth in the General Bidding requirements along with the responses as stated on the Bid Proposal Pages. Award of Bid shall be made to the lowest, most qualified and responsive Bidder(s). The Collier County Board of County Commissioners shall be the final judging authority as to which Bid best suits its needs and is in the best interest of Collier County. As a result of Collier County's substantial investment in the project's landscaping, the responsive Bidder shall: 1. Provide copy of Landscape Contractor's or Unlimited Landscape Contractor's License in Collier County. 2. Provide verification of current projects in landscaping maintenance business. 3. Provide documentation of minimum of three (3) years' experience in landscape grounds maintenance within the Southwest Florida area. Such documentation shall include but is not limited to: a. Project description; b. Time of performance; C. Names and phone numbers of individual references familiar with the Bidders' project performance; d. Area included in "Scope of Work ". 4. Provide a list of owned and/leased equipment to include, but not be limited to: a. Date of Manufacture; 16J 2 Bid No. 0 1-3 258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance Page b. Condition; c. Whether owned or leased; d. If leased, date of lease expiration. 5. Contractor shall provide the name, IRS W -4 form and proof of certification of the firm's employee qualifying the firm as to meeting the Collier County's Maintenance of Traffic policy requirements. 6. References for Netafim maintenance and installation, if project site applicable. 7. References for pump and well maintenance, if project site applicable. 15 If the documentation noted above is not submitted with the Bid Proposals, such Bid may not be considered. U. VENDER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION Collier County has implemented a Vendor Performance Evaluation System for all contracts awarded in excess of $25,000. To this end, Vendors will be evaluated on their performance upon completion/termination of agreement. H. SITE SPECIFIC MAINTENANCE FUNCTIONS A. CANOPY TREE AND PALM PRUNING Canopy trees shall be defined as any large shrub, tree or palm with foliage above a ten -foot (10') level. All canopy trees and palms shall be pruned on a continuous basis to create and maintain a seventeen - foot (17') canopy clearance over the roadways and a ten -foot (10') canopy clearance over all pathways. Canopy trees shall be selectively pruned twice per year in April and September so to thin the interior canopy of cross branching and to shape the canopy of the trees. A professional approved by the Contract Manager and licensed to prune trees under the direction of a Licensed Landscape Architect, Arborist, Tree Surgeon, or other approved professional shall do the pruning and shaping. The work shall be performed per ANSI A300 "Standard Practices for Trees, Shrubs and Other Woody Plant Maintenance" and done in a professional manner in accordance with "Pruning Standards" of the National Arborist Association or accepted local trade standards and practices. Palms shall be pruned annually during June of each year. The palms shall be pruned to a "Tropical Cut" or to a nine (9) o'clock - three (3) o'clock angle from horizontal at the base of the palm's bud or lowest fronds. Approximately seven (7) to ten (10) green fronds shall be left at the head after 16J 2 Bid'No. 01 -3258 —Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenan ce, page 16 pruning. The pruning shall include removal of all nuts, seed stalks, brown or dead and lower fronds removed from the palm. The work shall be done in a professional manner in accordance with acceptable trade standards and practices. The palms shall not be climbed with tree spikes to remove the fronds. The pruning shall be accomplished by the use of a ladder, boom truck or lift. All debris from the pruning shall be removed and the site shall be left in a clean and neat manner. When the annual or bi- annual heavy pruning work is being performed with the use of a lift or boom truck, it is required that the adjacent traffic or turn lane to the work area, be closed using traffic control devices and signage per the current F.D. O. T. traffic control standards and indexes. B. FERTILIZATION The Contract Manager reserves the right to change the fertilization schedule and formulation as needed to meet special turf or plant needs or other unforeseen conditions which may develop. Fertilization schedule changes may require adjustments and the per bag application costs will be added or deleted per the Unit Costs indicated on the Proposal Page. All bagged fertilizer will be purchased by Collier County under its Annual Contract and coordinated with the Contractor for delivery purposes. Prior to fertilization application, notification to the Contract Manager is required to allow for inspection of all bags. The Contractor may be required to pick up the fertilizer within Collier County. Cost for pick up, if necessary, and labor for placement, shall be included in Unit Cost/Bag as indicated on the Proposal Page. Granular fertilization of shrubs and groundcovers shall be applied by hand in a twelve -inch (12 ") radius ring around the base of the plants. Trees and palms shall have a thirty -six inch (36 ") radius ring around the base. An 8 oz. cup equals one (1) pound. Trees and palms shall receive one (1) cup per one -inch (1 ") caliper. Shrubs and groundcovers shall receive one (1) cup per three foot (3') of height or spread. Shrubs and groundcover shall receive one -half ('/2) cup per eighteen inches (18 ") of height or spread. All fertilizer shall be swept off all sidewalks, concrete curbing and paving. The fertilizer shall be applied as set forth in the following schedule. Turf Areas and Plant Beds containing Shrubs Groundcovers and Trees The (13 -3 -13) fertilizer shall be applied at a rate of ten (10) pounds per one thousand (1000) sq. ft. for all areas. Four applications of (13 -3 -13) fertilizer will be applied during the months of February, May, July, and October. One (1) application of (21 -0 -0) Ammonium sulfate at a rate of four and one half (4.5) pounds per one thousand (1000) sq. ft. shall be applied in the month of November. Four (4) applications of Sequestrene Iron at a mixture of 1.25 tablespoons per gallon will be applied during the months of March, June September and December. The application is to be a drench, at the root zone of all Bougainvillea, Juniper, Liriope, Allamanda, Iris, Ixora or any plants subject to iron deficiencies as determined by the Contract Manager. 16J 2 Bid "No. 01 -3258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance- 17 Six (6) applications of 20 -20 -20 at ten (10) pounds of materials per one hundred (100) gallons of water with Ferrmec AC 13 -0 -0 plus 6% iron at 1/3 gallon of material per one hundred (100) gallons of water. It is estimated that the turf and plant beds covering approximately eighty -three thousand five hundred fifty -seven (83,557) sq. ft., will require the application of four hundred seventy -eight (478) 50 -1b. bags per Contract period. All applications shall be made during the first week of the month. Applications shall be made the day following irrigation when plant material is dry. Shrubs and groundcovers shall have the fertilizer blown or fan raked off following the broadcast application. Immediately after the fertilizer is applied, the areas shall be watered. Fertilizers shall be removed from curbs and sidewalk areas to avoid staining. All applications shall be made during the first week of the month. Applications shall be made to turf the day following irrigation when grass blades are dry. In areas where applicable, immediately after the fertilizer is applied, the sprinklers shall be activated for thirty (30) minutes to bring organic fertilizers to the soil's surface and to dissolve water - soluble particles. Following this watering, the controls shall be returned to automatic mode. Fertilizers containing Iron shall be removed from curbs to avoid staining. Palms Contractor shall apply palm fertilizer during October and May as specified below. Collier County will provide fertilizer. Should yellowing occur on the top fronds, manganese sulfate will be required, and if on the lower fronds, magnesium sulfate will be required to be applied with the 10 -5 -10 at the rates specified. Granular fertilization of the Palms shall be determined by the caliper (diameter) of the Palm trunk and applied by hand in a ring around the Palm's base at a twenty -four (24 ") radius. It is estimated that the palms will require the application of twenty (20) 50 -1b, bags per Contract period (ten (10) bags per application). Formulation Application Rate (Per Tree) 10 -5 -10 22 Cabbage /Sabal Palms 5 -lbs. 31 Coconut Palms 5 -lbs. 50 Areca Palms 5 -lbs. 1 Traverls Palm 5 -lbs. C. ORNAMENTAL & TURF SPRAYING Overall Ornamental & Turf Spraying of plants, shrubs and grassed areas within Areas 1 are included in the Contract. 16J 2 Bid No. 01 -3258 -Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance_ Page 18 TABLE I Right of Way Area 1 Approximate Turf Area (St-Augustine) Approximate Planting Beds North R/W Vanderbilt Beach Rd. 5,217 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. Vanderbilt Beach Rd.- Palm Ct. 7,400 sq. ft. 1,709 sq. ft. Palm Ct. - Oak Ave. 3,750 sq. ft. 2,355 sq. ft. Oak Ave. - Pine Ave. 3,350 sq. ft. 1,870 sq. ft. Pine Ave. - Bayside Ave. 1,555 sq. ft. 1,575 sq. ft. Bayside Ave. - Lagoon Ave. 3,350 sq. ft. 1,891 sq. ft. Lagoon Ave. - Tradewinds Ave. 3,350 sq. ft. 1,575 sq. ft. Tradewinds Ave. - Willett Ave. 2,310 sq. ft. 2,165 sq. ft. Willett Ave. - Seagull Ave. 2,395 sq. ft. 1,795 sq. ft. Seagull Ave. - Germain Ave. 2,750 sq. ft. 2,238 sq. ft. Germain Ave. - Seabee Ave. 3,360 sq. ft. 1,890 sq. ft. Seabee Ave. - Conners Ave. 3,520 sq. ft. 2,375 sq. ft. Conners Ave. - Egret Ave. 2,020 sq. ft. 1,979 sq. ft. Egret Ave. - Heron Ave. 2,070 sq. ft. 2,293 sq. ft. Heron Ave. - Flamingo Ave. 2,984 sq. ft. 1,800 sq. ft. Flamingo Ave. - Bluebill Ave. /111 th 2,819 sq ft 3 847 sq ft Totals 52,200 sq. ft. 31,357 sq. ft. Area 2 Approximate Turf Area (Bahia) Approximate .Planting Beds NA 0 sq. ft. n .ft. Total: 0 sq. ft. 0 sq. ft. 1. It is required that the Pest Control Firm performing these services shall possess and provide the following to the Contract Manager: a. Valid State of Florida Pesticide License that complies with all Federal, State (Chapter 482) and local laws and regulations. b. Bachelor degree in Ornamental Horticulture and /or Entomology or the equivalent practical experience approved by the Owner. c. Current Contractor's Occupational License for Pest Control Service. 2. The Pest Control Firm shall provide an overall written pest and spray program that shall incorporate ant and rodent control and shall meet or exceed the following minimum standards: a. Describe procedures, methods and techniques that will enhance the environment. b. Provide the maximum protection for the health, safety and welfare of the public and environment. c. List of all chemicals to be used. 16J 2 Bid No. 0 1-3 258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance Page 19 3. The Pest Control Firm shall make on -site inspections and provide written reports to the Contract Manager once per month. 4. Methods of Application: One hundred percent (100 %) coverage and penetration shall be provided. Insecticides and fungicides shall be applied at the proper pressure to provide maximum coverage. Chinch bug treatments shall be applied at a minimum rate of ten (10) gallons of spray mix per one thousand (1000) square feet of treatment area. a. Insecticides should be alternated from time to time to prevent an insect immunity to the application. b. Herbicides used in turf areas shall be applied at the proper pressure. C. Herbicides shall not be applied when the temperature exceeds eighty -five (85) degrees. d. Spreader sticker (Nu -Film 17 or equal) shall be incorporated in all spraying of Groundcovers, Shrubs, Trees, Palms, and Turf Areas when recommended by the label. e. Spray applications shall be applied during times of "No- Wind" conditions. f. No trucks or tractors with bar type tires or a gross weight greater than three thousand (3000) pounds will be allowed within or on the right of way areas. g. At the time of application, provide and place traffic control meeting Florida Department of Transportation, M.U.T.C.D. and Indexes. h. All spray application shall contain a wetting agent within the mix when recommended by the label or Contract Manager. 5. Rate of Application: All chemicals shall be applied at the rates recommended on the manufacture's labels. 6. Materials List: All insecticides, fungicides and herbicides chemicals to be used on turf areas and on plant materials shall be submitted in writing to the Contract Manager for review and approval. 7. Application Schedule: The number of applications shall be as listed below unless otherwise required based upon the on- site inspection reports. Ferrmec AC 13 -0 -0 plus 6% iron at one -third (1/3) gallon of material per 16J Bid No. 01 -3258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance Page 20 one hundred (100) gallons of water to be added with each application of insecticide, fungicide and herbicide. a. Turf Areas: Insecticides & Fungicides - Twelve (12) applications on an as needed basis. Herbicides - Six (6) applications, to include Pre - emergent in February and September, Post- emergent in November, January and March or on an as needed basis b. Groundcovers, Shrubs and Trees: Insecticides & Fungicides - Twelve (12) applications on an as needed basis. C. Bed Areas: Herbicides - Six (6) applications, Pre - emergent in February and September, Post - emergent in November, January and March or on an as needed basis. 8. Additional Requirements: When it becomes necessary for the Contractor to return for additional spraying as directed by the Contract Manager due to non - performance of a required application, such shall be performed at no cost to the Owner. D. MULCHING Organic Mulch Areas with no mulch or new planting areas shall have mulch placed to provide for a four inch (4 ") non - compacted or unsettled depth measured from the existing soil grade. The area to receive the mulch shall be raked level to establish the proper finished grade and have all weeds removed prior to the placement of the mulch. Labor cost for weeding, hand grading and placement of new mulch shall be per Unit Cost as indicated on the Proposal Page. Re- mulching of plant beds and individual plant mulch rings shall have a two -inch (2 ") non - compacted layer of mulch applied during the months of November and May. Prior to the re- mulching, the Contractor shall turn, mix and if required remove a one foot (1') wide three inch (3 ") deep area of mulch and dirt from behind the back of curb around all medians. Labor costs for weeding, turning, mixing, removal of the existing mulch and for placement of new mulch shall be per Unit Cost as indicated on the Proposal Page. Mulch shall not be placed over utility boxes, irrigation heads or valve boxes that are located within mulched areas. General Mulch material shall be purchased by Collier County under its Annual Contract and coordinated with the Contractor for delivery purposes. 16J 2 Bid No. 01 -3258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance, Page 21 E. IVIISCELLANEOUS SITE FIXTURE AND FEATURES Benches, other site fixtures and features shall be visually reviewed weekly to determine if functional, damage or hazardous problems exist. A weekly, manual operation of the accent lighting within Vanderbilt Drive medians is required to verify proper operation. If any damage or improper operation are found or viewed, immediate notification of the Contract Manager is required. F. LANE CLOSURE Lane closure for median maintenance shall be limited. Upon proper placement of lane closed signs, pre - warning signs, arrow boards, traffic cones, etc., the lane may be restricted from traffic only during non -peak traffic periods which are 9:30 A.M. - 3:30 P.M., Monday through Friday, and 8:00 A.M. - 5:00 P.M. Saturday and Sunday, unless otherwise approved by the Contract Manager. G. IRRIGATION SYSTEMS This project site has conventional pop -up sprinkler systems. All services listed under this Section "II- G ", shall be covered in the Contract Proposal item "Irrigation System" cost under Basic Maintenance Functions. Contractor shall bid an hourly rate to cover all irrigation items listed below for the conventional pop -up systems. Conventional Pop -up Irrigation Systems: Weekly Service Requirements: 1. Each median and side right of way zone shall be manually turned on at the valve to ascertain proper operation of the system. 2. Repair system for any blown -off heads, broken lines or leaks around heads or valves. 3. Check the controllers and rain sensing devices for proper operation and settings. 4. The Contractor shall further adjust all sprinkler heads to ensure that all landscaped areas receive one hundred percent (100 %) irrigation coverage. 5. Within all work areas, the Contractor shall review the plant material and turf for dry conditions and if found, advise the Contract Manager and correct the problem immediately. Monthly Service Requirements: 1. Manually run the system, clean and adjust sprinkler heads /nozzles and irrigation shields if existing as necessary to ensure for proper coverage and that there are no sprinklers heads /nozzles spraying directly onto the roadway or sidewalk areas. 16J 2 Bid-No. 0 1-3 25 8 — Vanderbilt Drive NiSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance Page 22 General Service Requirements for Irrigation Systems: 1. Should South Florida Water Management District or other governing agency establish water restrictions, the irrigation systems shall be inspected and all controllers set to the mandated hours of operation set by the District or Agency. Subsurface systems are exempt from water restrictions. 2. Replace defective heads or nozzles, install or replace defective risers and repair minor breaks or restricted sprinkler lines. 3. Replace damaged valve boxes /lids if caused by the Maintenance Contractor. 4. Inspect, clean and replace, if necessary, screen/filters within the sprinkler heads. 5. Use only County approved replacement parts, and use only matched precipitation head replacements. Replacement sprinkler heads shall be supplied by Collier County. 6. Keep all grass and mulch out of all valve boxes. All valve boxes in sod areas are to be kept at sod level. All valve boxes in plant beds are to be kept two inches (2 ") above finished mulch level. Inside of all valve boxes shall be kept clean, and the valves shall be kept one hundred percent (100 %) accessible. 7. Upon issuance of a "Notice to Proceed" the Contractor shall review all irrigation systems and notify the Contract Manager of any existing problems. 8. One hundred percent (100 %) irrigation coverage shall be maintained within all irrigated landscaped areas while this Contract is in effect. 9. Notification to the Contract Manager is required when acts of vandalism or accidents have damaged the irrigation system. Photos shall be taken' and provided to the Contract Manager at no added cost. MISCELLANEOUS IRRIGATION MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBELITIES 1. Should the temperature be forecast to be below thirty -four (34) degrees, the Contractor shall be responsible for turning the irrigation system off in order to protect plants from possible freeze damage. 2. It shall be the Contractor's responsibility to notify the Contract Manager of any irrigation problems or additional irrigation maintenance needs. 3. Major repairs to the irrigation systems include repairs to valves, controllers, electrical wiring, main lines and costs of materials will be considered as additional expenses to the Contract and must be approved by the Contract Manager prior to such repairs being performed unless an emergency condition exists that requires immediate repair. Minor repairs include replacement 16J 2, Bid No. 01 -3258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance_. Page 23 4. of heads and nozzles, installation or replacement of risers, repair of minor /lateral pvc piping breaks or subsurface piping or restricted sprinkler lines, replacement of damaged valve boxes /lids, rain shutoff devices and bypass switches necessary for proper and safe operation of the systems. 5. Should additional costs be involved which are not covered within the Contract Specifications, a Unit Cost shall be agreed upon by the Contractor and the Contract Manager prior to performing additional services. 6. The irrigation service personnel shall have on -site two -way hand -held communications during all services and/or inspections. 6. The irrigation service personnel must trouble shoot the time clock, i.e. power -in 110 volt and 24 -volt fuses, 24 volts output when necessary. H. BRICK PAVERS All median brick paving shall be pressure cleaned twice per year, in April and November, to remove marks, gum and other dirt that may be deposited on the surface areas. Sealing of the paving areas shall be at the direction of the Contract Manager on a time and materials basis. Upon finding damage to the brick pavers, immediate notification of the Contract Manager, or his authorized representative, is required. Upon finding damaged areas, the Contractor shall clean -up debris if present, and /or flag off the areas with protective barriers and /or high visibility hazard tape. The Contractor shall submit a proposal as soon as possible for the repair or replacement of the damaged brick paving areas. Repairs to the brick pavers will be considered as additional expenses to the contract. The additional expenses shall be charged as a time and materials billing, with the bricks being provided by the County. All additional expenses must be pre- approved by the Contract Manager. I. EMERGENCY LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES The Contractor agrees by submittal of its bid that the listed services Unit Costs in the Proposal Pages under this Contract shall also be made available to the County on a temporary basis as emergency landscape maintenance services. The contracted services within these specifications may be required to be temporarily performed at another project site located within Collier County. The Emergency Services item's costs shall be based upon this project's square foot areas and bid Unit Costs converted to square foot costs as listed in the specifications and contact Proposal Pages and agreed to by both parties. If additional travel expenses are determined to be necessary for travel to an Emergency Services project site, the Contract Manager and Contractor will determine an amount of hours to be billed at the hourly rate charges as listed under "General Services" of the Proposal. 16J 2 Bid No. 01 -3258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance.... Page 24 J. TURF ORIGIN AND QUALITY All turf supplied shall be "Nursery Grown" or "Field Grown" for the purposes of sodding and shall be a "Premium Grade Sod" as specified below. The sod shall be cut, delivered and /or laid in accordance with the following specifications or the most current and accepted Horticultural Industry's Standards and Practices whichever is more restrictive. All sod shall be delivered to the site and be accompanied with a delivery ticket listing quantity, origin and date and time the sod was cut and loaded. Sod shall be delivered at the specified site within a twenty -four (24) hour period after field cutting and shall be laid within a forty -eight (48) hour period after field cutting. Sod being transported for a time period greater than one (1) hour shall be covered during transport. The Contractor acknowledges that acceptance of any sod at anytime of a Grade other than the Premium Grade specified in this Contract shall not establish a lessor standard or relieve the Contractor from providing the Premium Grade sod as specified for the duration of the Contract period. Premium Sod Sand Grown: Turf grown on 90% natural sand. Muck Grown: Turf grown on soil containing 50% or greater amounts of organic materials by volume. Each sod pad shall be insect and disease free, be vigorous and have healthy green color. The top growth (grass blades or foliage), shall have no more than ten percent (10 %) chlorosis and contain no thatch or dead vegetation layer within each pad. Sod shall be weed free, but in no case shall the weeds exceed two percent (2 %) of the total sod pad. Pad Size: Individual sod pads shall be cut to industry standard widths and lengths with a deviation no greater than +/- five percent (5 %). Broken or uneven ended pads will not be accepted. Pad Thickness: Thickness of the cut sod shall be to the industry's standard, but in no case shall the thickness of the soil be less than one inch (1 ") in depth for St. Augustine and Bahia grasses. Strength of Pad: Standard size pads shall be mature, well rooted and contain a soil layer thick enough to provide a strength that will support the pad's weight and maintain it's size and shape when the pad is suspended vertically by hand on the upper ten percent (10 %) of the pad section without tearing apart. Moisture Content: The sod soil shall contain enough moisture so that the soil is not excessively dry or wet. In no case will the sod be accepted if the soil layer becomes hardened or loose so not to hold it's shape and/or be hydrophobic in nature. 16J 2 Bid No. 01 -3258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance_. Page 25 K. QUANTITIES The Quantities listed in the Contract Proposal are approximate and are for the purpose of bid evaluation. The County reserves the right to order such quantities as may be required during said period, but does not guarantee any minimum or maximum to be ordered during the period specified. 16J 2 Bid No. 01 -3258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance.. Page 27 CONTRACT PROPOSAL -: FROM: Ncr, y 370 Gtrrn MMW BW. MOW34104 DANE DUE: duly 27, 2001 @ 2:30 p.m. Board of County Commissioners 1 Collier County Government Center Naples, Florida ; RE: Bid No. 01 -3258 - "Vanderbilt Drive Beautification Area Grounds Maintenance" Dear Commissioners: The undersigned, as BIDDER, hereby declares that he has examined the site of the work and informed himself fully in regard to all conditions pertaining to the place where the work is to be done; and that he has examined the Specifications for the work and the Documents hereto attached. The BIDDER further declares that the only persons, company or parties interested in the Proposal or the Contract to be entered into as principals are named herein; that this Proposal is made without connection with any other person, company or parties making Bid or Proposal; and it is in all respect fair and in good faith, without collusion or fraud. The BIDDER further certifies that he has familiarized himself with the Federal, State and Local laws pertaining to the type of work proposed. The BIDDER proposed and agrees, if this Proposal is accepted, to Contract with the ORTNER in the form of Contract specified, to furnish work in fiA in complete accordance with shown, noted, described and reasonably intended requirements of these Plans, Specifications, Contract Documents and all Addenda thereto for the €ollowing Unit Prices: _ Any discounts or terms must be shown on the proposal form. Such discounts, if any, will be considered and computed in the tabulation of the bids. In no instance should terms for less than (15) days payment be offered. Prompt Payment Terms: _0210 ja Days; Net 30 Days Addenda received (if applicable): #10 y � #2 J' k #3 t �" 16J Bid No. 0 1-3 258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance Page 28 I. BASIC MAIlII'TENANCE FUNCTIONS Cost to Perform Basic Maintenance Functions as follows within Area #1: Function QZ-1. Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Mowing & Edging 52 Ea. $ 1/0/00 $ Z? yd, dry -- Irrigation Systems a. Pop -up systems 80 hrs. Ea. Weeding 52 Ea. Trimming & Pruning 52 Ea. Trash Removal 52 Ea. Street Cleaning 52 Ea. Traffic Control 52 Ea_ SUBTOTAL "A" (Annual costs): SUBTOTAL "A" (divided by 12 months) Monthly Total H. Site Specific Maintenance Functions as follows: A FERT=ATION (County will supply granular fertilizer) s l ® $ )9,04"00 $ M: $--12 W. 00 — 9r �" $t �V� G/Y ✓; $ ©o $ $ aq $ $ tr 2. 3, Function Qty. Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Turd Groundcover, Shrubs 500 Bags Ea. $ (J $ 0,) D Palms and Canopy Trees Perform Sequestrene Iron Drench Application 4 Ea 20 -20 -20 6 Ea. $ .'�J► $ 4 <0,00 SUBTOTAL "B" $ � ;,0,a 16J 2 Bid No. 0 1-3 258 — Vanderbilt Drive WTU Roadway Grounds Maintaaance_ Page 29 B. ORNAAU.NTA -T SPRAYING Function C>tv. " Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Turf Area: Insecticides & Fungicides 12 Ea. Appl. $1 $, AC 13 -0 -0 plus 6% iron Herbicides 6 - Ea. Appl. $ kg0,6V $�;% AC 13 -0 -0 plus 6% iron Groundcover, Sbrubs & Trees: Insecticides & Fungicides 12 Ea. Appl. AC 13 -0 -0 plus 6% iron Herbicides 6 Ea. Appl. ` AC 13-0 -0 plus 6% iron, SUB'T'OTAL "C„ $ �a C. MULL G OF PLAINT BEDS Function QV. Unit Unit Cost Total Cost -- Carrotwood 6 Ea. Cut Application (May &t Nov.) 3,625 Bags Ea. $ I gs- $ 3 s D. 1VIISCELLANB®US STTE FIXTURES AND FEATURES Function QM Unit Unit Cost Total Cost -- Carrotwood 6 Ea. Cut Test and Inspect 52 Week $Sol) $ 4", j, E. CAN CII'Y TREE AND P AJLM PRUNING Function C►ty. Unit Unit Cost Total Cast Canopy Trees: - (April and September) -- Carrotwood 6 Ea. Cut $ 3 bd o,� $ - --� Ficus 4 Ea. Cut $ . Oe7 $ I it) ,,o -' - - Giant Bird of Paradise 2 Ea. Cut $ S. $ so -- Green Buttonwood 6 Ea. Cut $ 0 $ g2 Ligustrum I Ea. Cut $ S' av $ „6a,- —Silk Oak I Ea. Cut $- -- Silver Buttonwood 8 Ea. Cut $ 15 : pa S /2-0.00 -- --Oaks 4 Ea. Cut $ $ ®A " -- Pink Tabs 6 Ea. Cut $-1-2, S 01,1017 SUBTOTAL "O" $ 3dl / 1 " Bid No. 01 -3258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance Palms: - (June) • Areca 50 Ea. $ ® D Christmas 8 Ea. $ Q.Q., Q Coconut 31 Ea _.. $ S, 4r' - Sabal/Cabbage 22 Ea. $ /7,00 • Travelers 1 Ea. $ S. ev SUBTOTAL "E" 16J 2 Page 30 $ O,y✓ $_ 12 /4 0 F. Brick Pavers Function Oty. Unit Unit Cost Total Cost Pressure Clean 2,489 sq. ft. 2 $ ��`, $ fir, (April & Nov.) III. SUMMARY OF ANNUAL COSTS Basic Maintenance Functions (Subtotal "A" Annual Costs) Separate Maintenance Functions for: Fertilization (Subtotal "B") Omamental Spraying (Subtotal "C ") Mulching of Plant Beds Miscellaneous Site Fixtures and Features Canopy Tree Subtotal ( "D" x 2) Palm Pruning Subtotal ("E ") Brick Pavers IV. TOTAL BASE BID (Written Amount) $ 'W 0s r $ t 0,a0 $ 3, a it,-2 S" -- It .2610, 00 $ 16J 2 Bid Ho. 01 -3258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance.. _ Page 31 V.TOTAL AMN (Crew Size) TO PERFORM SERVICES (Minimum 4 person crew required per week) Per Week ESTIMATED TOTAL MAN -HOURS TO PERFORM REQUIRED SERVICES (The Contractor shall submit the amount of man -hours that they intend to provide to this Contract on a weekly basis.) Hours Per Week VI. ADDMONAL LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE SERVICES Should additional work of the following description be required, adjustment will be made to the Contract Sum at the following Unit Prices, which shall include all expenses, including overhead and profit. A. GENERAL SERVICES Labor (per man -hour) Supervision (per man-hour) Irrigation Labor (per roan -hour) only Irrigation Supervision (per man-hour) Rental cost per day of a 4,000 gallon tanker with Operator with required operator license. B. PLANTING SERVICES $ J $ Ii/0 , 4 2) These services shall be activated in the event that damaged or dead plant material requires replacement and/or landscape areas require minor renovations. Quotes requested for items under this Section generally shall be for small quantities. The Contractor shall bid installed Unit prices which includes materials and labor required for the installation and watering until establishment or irrigation system is providing coverage. All plant material provided shall be Florida #1 or better as specified by the Department of Agriculture's "Grades and Standards for Nursery Plants" Volumes I & H latest edition. 16J 2 Bid No. 01 -3258 —Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance___ Page 32 ITEM Unit Unit Cost 1. Mulch Shredded Cypress Bark, Grade "A ", 2" depth sq. ft. $ 1- .2 5� Eucalyptus, Grade "A ", 2" depth sq. ft. $ / 7 .S� Designer red mulch, Grade "A ", 2" depth sq. ft. $_2 , a Pine straw, 3" fluffed depth sq. ft. $ < Washed shell, 3" depth sq. ft. $ %2 2. Plants a. 4" Container_ Annuals / Perennials each Begonias, Impatiens, Lantana, Pentas Purple queen, Dune sunflower, etc. b. 1 Gallon Container African Iris each $ & Coontie each Day -lily, evergreen variety each $ Fla. Gama grass each $ Juniper Tarsonn each $ ' . 'r Liriope 'Evergreen giant' each $ _5�9,O Purple queen each $ _S�,-ey Spider lily each $ 6 ,-A ' c. 3 Gallon Container Cocoplurn Horizontal' each $ G,-o-v Coontie each $ Dwarf bougianvillea each $ S, B� Fakahatchee grass each $ / -S'0 Florida privet each $ Z3,1;W Fountain grasses each $_j 3 , o0 Rex'Scheilings dwarf each $ 13 <p Indian hawthorn 'Alba', white each $ / 3 , 0a Ixora Nora grant' each $ 13,00 Dwarf Ixora each $ /7,100 Juniper Tarsonif each $ /sf Spider lily each $ l.�1 Thryallis each $ i 3,e.7 Turnera 'Yellow Alder' each $ !S- w Wax myrtle each $ / 'R ,Ov Saw palmetto each $ Sea oats each $ /%16171 Silver buttonwood each $ Simpson stopper each $ / 71,9V Bid No. 01 -3258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds MWntenancr. Varigated pittosporum Walter's viburnum d. 10 Gallon Container Bottlebrush Red cluster' Cardboard palm Cattley guava Crinum lily Crape myrtle Hibiscus standard King sago Ligustrum Myrsine Silver buttonwood Simpson stopper Wax myrtle Varigated pittosporum e. 30 Gallon Container Bottlebrush Red cluster' Cassia Crape myrtle Dahoon holly Holly East palatka' Foxtail palm Ligustrum Live oak Mahogany Magnolia Red maple Orange geiger Slash pine Tabebuia'Ipe' Wax myrtle White geiger- £ 65 Gallon Container Bottlebrush rRed cluster' Crape myrtle Dahoon holly Holly Bast palatka' Foxtail palm Ligustrum Live oak Unit each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each each 16J 2 Page 33 Unit Cost $ OD.-e-P $ /00,Pq $ $ ?da . g-a $3 $ �Yp.a� $ � yo. a $ fir° $�efJ $ �• $ 4r? $ �6D, 0-V $ 3 ,B-a $ e —I& —v bn�,19-p $6 $ $ 9W, or Bid No. 01 -3250 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance -- ITEM 16J 2 Page 34 Unit Unit Cost Mahogany each $ S8, Ov Magnolia each $ �S'f Red maple each $ g , Orange geiger each $ S� t9- OT Slash pine each $ S ? z"' n Tabebuia'Ipe' each Wax myrtle each White geiger each $ , 3. Palms Sabal palm (10' to 20' CT -) each Sabal palm (10" to 20' Booted) each Key thatch palm (6' to 7' HT., field grown) each $� Ribbon palm (6'to 7' HT., field grown) each $� Royal palm (16' to 18' CT) each $120-1-67-a Carpentaria palm (16' CT.) each $ LS2� -" Washington palm (30' CT.) each $ O, 41014" 4. Cangpy Trees Live oak (100 gal. Cont., 4 " -5" cal., 16'ht.) each Live oak (200 gal. Cont., 6" -8' cal., 20' ht) each $ fI C. LIQUID FERTILISATION APPLICATION Apply Peters 20 -20 -20 at 10 pounds of material per 100 gallons of water with Ferromec AC 13 -0 -0 plus 6% Iron at 1/3 gallon of material per 100 gallons of water. Unit Unit Cost Turf per sq. ft. $ , 03 Planting Beds per sq. ft. $ ,03 D. SOD SERVICES Unit Unit Cost per sq. $. $ . So Removal of existing sod/weeds with sod cutter or by hand and prepare soil/area to the proposed finished grade suitable for new sod (Includes one herbicide treatment and all landfill tipping fees). Bid No. 01 -3258 — Vanderbilt Drive WTU Roadway Grounds Maintenance 16J 2 Page 35 E.. SOD / TURF GRASSES Delivered, off - loaded, fine graded for sod, laid in place, rolled and trim edges as necessary: Sod cost for areas with subsurface irrigation systems will require daily supplemental top or hand watering until the subsurface irrigation system provides adequate watering (approx. 3 weeks). St. Augustine Conventional Subsurface Irrigation Irrigation Unit Unit Cost Unit Cost 1. Floratam: Muck grown per 500 sq. ft. pallet $ Sand grown per 400 sq. ft. pallet $ 710, ov $ -?79, 2. Palmetto: Muck grown per 500 sq. ft. pallet $ 350 -.0V $ Sand grown per 400 sq. ft. pallet $ .300.&-d $ :' 3. Bitter blue: Muck grown per 500 sq. ft. pallet $ 2sv'" Sand grown per 400 sq. ft. pallet S-3-00 "eV $ ,, Bahia 1. Argentine: Sand grown per 400 sq. ft. pallet $ /Q� $ VII. ALTERNATES Street Sweeping 12 Ea. $ j ll p,00 $ - SUBCONTRACTORS TO BE USED: (In no instance may subcontractor(s) perform more than 490% of the Total Bid amount) Name A I * Al k (Spraying) Phone Name ,fit' Q A/ (Irrigation) Phone Name ltd �` e S K1 V 64 +.a.v _ ,,y7 -Z S' Q 6 Phone 16J 2 Bid No. 01 -3258 - Vandeibilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grounds i IAktenance.- page Documentation enclosed: • Copy of current Landscape Contractor's License. yes no or Unlimited Landscape Contractor's License • Verification of current projects in landscaping es no Y maintenance business. • List of owned and/or leased equipment. yes no Documentation of minimum three (3) years L/ yes no experience within Southwest Florida. Photo and/or manufacturer's brochure with specifications of street sweeping equipment provided. yes no • Verification of Maintenance of Traffic Policy yes no requirements provided_ 36 The Service to be furnished by us is hereby declared and guaranteed to be in conformance with the specifications of Collier County. The undersigned does agree that should this Proposal be accepted, to execute the form of contract and present the same to the County Purchasing Director for approval within fifteen (15) days after being notified of the awarding of the Contract. The undersigned does further agree that failure to execute and deliver said forms of contract within fifteen (15) days, will result in damages to the County. 16.1 2 Bid No. 01-3258 — Vanderbilt Drive MSTU Roadway Grmmds Maintenance page 37 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, WE have hereunto subscribed our names on this '26 day of �d 2001 in the County of C1SL_ L in the State of ce +� kjgn�!)'�! .S1 d.AMp f9r.fr'�.ded,J�; �lajC, Bidder's Complete Legal Name Circle one: Corporatio Sole Proprietorship, Partnership Phone No. Y f — ?:�'`/'.7 — 62 CJ FAX No.(— IV 4 Address BY: Typed and Written Signature Title 16J 2 EXECUTIVE SLUIVEVLARY REQUEST BOARD DIRECT STAFF TO FORM A MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT (MSTU) FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING MA. iNTENA.NCE AND OPERATIONAL FUNDING FOR THE EJUSTING LANDSCAPING LVi IPROVEMENTS ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF VANDERBILT DRIVE FROM V ANDERBMT BEACH ROAD TO 111 th AVENUE AND FOR FUTURE AREAWME INIl'ROVEMENT PROJECTS. OBJECTIVE: To present information and background to the Board of County Commissioners regarding the installation of landscaping improvements along the west side of Vanderbilt Drive from Vanderbilt Beach Road north to Bluebill Avenue and to request the formation of an MSTU for the purpose of funding the operations and maintenance of those improvements: CONSIDERATIONS: The Vanderbilt Drive Improvement Project dates back to late 1996. At that time, the Collier County Wastewater Department had to replace a force main along that roadway. The Vanderbilt Beach Property Owners Association (VBPOA) requested that pathway and landscaping upgrades along the west side of Vanderbilt Drive be performed in concert with that utility work. On January 7, 1997 the Board authorized funding for the enhanced pathway and landscaping (Agenda Item 16B(10)). In March, 1997, a VBPOA representative, NIr. Kim Kobza, informed the county that a separate entity, the Vanderbilt Beach Beautification Trust (VBBT), had been formed to fund the maintenance of the improvements and that the VBBT desired an agreement with the county for long -term maintenance and cost - sharing. The construction work for the pathway and the landscaping took place in the summer of 1997. Since that time, both the county and the VBBT have attempted to finalize a maintenance agreement. The most recent meeting between VBBT representatives and county staff took place on Tuesday, March 6 with members of the VBBT Board of Directors. Mr. Kobza is no longer associated with the VBBT and, based on discussions with their Board at the referenced meeting, it does not appear that funding the maintenance of the project via the VBBT will be a viable alternative to the formation of an MSTU. At that meeting staff committed to performing an inspection and audit of the entire project to assess the current state of landscaping. Staff also committed to bringing this issue before the Board of County Commissioners with a request that an MSTU be formed. The VBPOA is requesting that the boundaries of the proposed MSTU be coincident with the boundaries of the VBPOA (Attachment No. 1). It is the intent of the VBPOA that the MSTU be used for a variety of neighborhood improvements as well as a funding mechanism for existing improvements. One of the expense items not currently funded is the irrigation water bill. A stable re -use effluent supply for this area was not available at the time the project was designed. This fact led to the design decision to- use potable water as an irrigation source. No C-EN IT APR 2 4 nni Executive Summary 16 J 2 Formation of an MSTU for Vanderbilt Drive Landscaping Improvements Page 2 of 3 The invoices had originally been running about $1800- $2000 per month, but recent bills have been under $1000 per month. The VBBT has been providing plant maintenance services; however, those services have not been sufficiently funded to provide adequate service to maintain plant health and to maintain the irrigation system. The county has, thus far, been paying the water bill (Board Agenda Item 16E(1), Oct. 9, 1999, originally Fund 103, now Fund 111). At the request of the VBPOA, staff performed an audit of the existing improvements and provided the VBPOA with its findings (Attachment No. 2). Based on that audit, staff believes that it will cost about $65,000 to bring the existing landscaping and irrigation back to the condition it was in when originally accepted for maintenance under the construction contract. Ordinance 98 -45, the Collier County Capital Assessment Ordinance, Section 11, provides that the Board of County Commissioners may create a funding entity for the benefit of property owners for a Capital Improvement. Since the landscaping improvements are in place and since they must be consistently and professionally maintained, staff recommends the formation of an MSTU to fund the operations and maintenance of the improvements. Since any newly formed MSTU will not be able to fund the maintenance for the existing landscaping until fiscal year 2003, staff is also recommending that the Board provide interim funding to the proposed MSTU in the amount of $135,000 to continue maintenance for the balance of the current fiscal year and fiscal year 2002. This funding would be paid back in tow installments by the MSTU in the FY 2003 and FY 2004 budgets. FISCAL IMPACT: There is an existing MST/BU Liaison position in the Transportation Operations Department along with clerical support. The existing staff is sufficient to manage this entity. The total assessed value within the proposed MSTU, per the Tax Assessor's Office is about $636 million. Staff estimates the annual costs for maintenance and administrative fees will be between $60,000 and $80,000. Based on the estimated assessed value and the estimated annual maintenance and operating costs, staff estimates that a 0.5 mil cap will be sufficient to fund the annual operations and maintenance costs of the proposed MSTU while allowing for normal cost escalation in the future. If the Board concurs with staff recommendation for the interim loan, the first two year's assessments for the district will be about 0.275 mils each. Subsequent year's assessments for the. maintenance of the existing improvements will be about 0.12 mils. This mil rate would mean an assessment of about $27.50 per $100,000 of assessed value the first two years and about $12.00 per $100,000 of assessed value each subsequent year. Staff recommends interim funding to the MSTU for the balance of this fiscal year's maintenance needs, in the form of a loan to the MSTU, in the amount of $100,000 from MSTD General Fund 111 Carry Forward Funds with repayment to be made from the first year's operating budget for the MSTU. For FY 02, staff recommends a further loan to the MSTU in an amount not to exceed $100,000, based on performance during FY 01, in the Landscaping Cost Center (163646) of the MSTD General Fund (111). The total amount, not to exceed $200,000, would be repaid to Fund No. APR 2 4 2001 P9. 16J 2 Executive Summary Formation of an MSTU for Vanderbilt Drive Landscaping Improvements Page 3 of 3 111 out of tax proceeds from the IVISTU commencing in FY 03 and will be paid back over a 2 year period. GROWTH MAINAGEMENT IMPACT: None RECOMIVIENDATION: That the Board direct staff to proceed with the formation of the MSTU; authorize the transfer of up to $100,000, from fiscal year 2000 landscape carry - forward funds to the newly formed MSTU, budget 5100,000 in the FY 02 NISTD General Fund budget; authorize all necessary documentation and budget amendments; and, return with a final Assessment Roll and Tentative Budget for FY 02. SUBMITTED BY: APPROVED BY:_ N Attachments ard,d: I� t, PE, Transportation ons Director E. Feder, AICP, Transportation Administrator DATE: 000, DATE: / No. jI — Location Map of Proposed MSTU Boundaries No. 2 — Transmittal of Landscape Audit and Landscape Audit Findings A ?Q(p A.� - APR 2 4 20-01 I P-i 16J 2 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT TRANSPORTATION SERVICES DIVISION TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT March 14, 2001 Mr. Richard Lydon 450 Tradewinds Avenue Naples, Florida 34108 Re: Vanderbilt Drive Audit of Landscape Maintenance 1 � Dear M .�Lyd 16J 2 2705 S. HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FL 34104 (941) 774 -8494 FAX (941) 659 -5787 transportation@colhergov.net Thank you and the other Board members for the Vanderbilt Trust for taking the time to meet with Bob Petersen and me on Tuesday, March 6, 2001. As promised at that meeting, staff of the Landscape Operations Section did an irrigation and - landscaping audit,of the _ current conditions. Through our inspections, we found the irrigation system to be malfunctioning and the plant material and sod to be stressed or in decline in many areas. These conditions are troubling from a maintenance perspective and indicate that the maintenance had not been performed correctly. The irrigation system was not functioning properly, if at all, in some locations. As -indicated in the report, the controller was in an "Error 2 mode ", which prevents it from operating at all. The majority of the sprinkler heads were not functioning properly, and many were either clogged or missing the spray heads. Many of these sprinkler heads had been replaced with the wrong type of nozzle, creating spray patterns that extend into the path of traffic, or onto the sidewalk. Therefore, many of these heads fail to irrigate the intended plant material. There were some lateral supply lines that were broken and had not been repaired. The valve boxes showed no sign of being inspected or maintained, and in some areas where new construction has taken place after the original installation, these areas have no water at all. According to your conversation with Bob Petersen Monday, March 12, 2001, the landscape contractor advised you that he was using the specifications established for the Trust. These specifications are quite specific about weekly and monthly irrigation checks, weekly, monthly and annual landscape tasks and require regular meetings with the contract administrator along with immediate notification of loss of plant material. These specifications also require weekly work logs, which are to be turned in monthly to the Trust. It is our understanding that none of these requirements have been met. ATTACHMENT NO. 2 PAGE % OF 4- ACS r M APR,9q 2001 Pg. s 16J 2 Mr. Richard Lyden March 14, 2001 Page 2 of 4 Much of the plant material was found to be poorly maintained, improper pruning methods or not pruned at all and there are many plants that have died and need replacement. Again, this contrary to the specifications, which your contractor advised he has been following. The cost to fix the deficiencies found in the irrigation system is estimated to be $20,000; however; we recommend that bids be secured so that we may be more confident of this budget estimate figure. Additionally, to replace the missing or dead plant material, apply mulch, and clean and prune the plant material that still exists is estimated to cost about $6,000.00. Mulch for the entire length of the project is estimated at about $38,000.00. Overall, we believe that it will take about $65,000 to bring the existing landscaping back up to the level that is expected by the residents. I suggest that we approach the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation to form an MSTU at its next available meeting. There is a meeting on Match 27 and one on April 10. Although it will take considerable time to form the MSTU, I further suggest that at the same time as we recommend the formation, we also request a budget transfer to provide funds for the immediate repairs necessary. These funds would be a loan to the MSTU and would be paid back during the first year of operation of the MSTU. _ _ I look forward to hearing from you at your earliest convenience. Very trRly yours, Edward J. Kant, Transportation rations Director cc: Normkn E. Feder, AICP, Transportation Administrator John Dunnick, Assistant to the County Manager Bob Petersen, Landscape MSTU Liaison Val Prince, Landscape Operations Engineer Pamela J. Lulich, ASLA, Landscape Operations Manager File: Vanderbilt Drive ATTACHMENT NQ.a___ PAGE -2-- QF 4- AGSM B M No, APR `S 2001 P9.-- Mr. Richard Lyden 16J 2 1 March 14, 2001 Page 3 of 4 1 Prepared by: Val Prince, Maintenance Operations As requested, a visual and irrigation operational check of Vanderbilt Drive 1.3 mile landscape segment from Vanderbilt Beach Road to 111 m Ave. was preformed on March 12, 2001. The observations and continents are not intended to be all - inclusive. The information and costs indicated below are for estimating purposes. Labor for traffic control, clean -up costs and tipping fees are not included. Observations and Comments: Irrigation System 1. The irrigation controller read "Error 2 ". This code places the controller in an inoperable phase with no zones running. Controller to valve operation could not be checked. 2. From date of original installation with all Hardie sprinkler heads there have been numerous heads replaced with either Rain bird or Toro products. 3. The heads vary in size from 6" to 12" in areas that are not necessary: 4. Some heads are without nozzles, some nozzles that have been replaced provide the incorrect coverage, and some nozzles are restricted. 5. There are various problems with the irrigation heads such as; heads completely missing, heads that do not pop -up, heads that have come out of adjustment an are not providing proper coverage, heads that are buried and are restricted by the plant's current condition. 6. Irrigation supply lines which are broken. -- 7. Valve boxes that are not being properly inspected and maintained. 8. Missing valve Boxes. 9. As a result of new construction after the original installation, there are r/w areas that have no irrigation coverage. Landscape Materials 1. Plants have not been properly maintained. 2. Plants are missing, either improperly pruned or in need of pruning. 3. Chemical applications are needed on the plants. 4. The turf appears to be too closely cut and dollar weed along with other weeds exist in the turf areas. 5. Trees/Palms canopy over the sidewalk need to be maintained at a height of 10'. 6. Trees/Palms dead branching needs to be removed. Mulch 1. There is little to no mulch to control the weeds and retain the moisture. ATTACHMENT NO. PAGE of AGES 'l F�9o.4 APR e,2� -2001 Pg. 16J 2 Mr. Richard Lyden March 14, 2001 Page 4 of 4 Recommendations and Costs Irritation Svstem Based on the March 12, 2001 status of the existing system immediate nozzle adjustment or change out, head replacement and repair all the systems leaks are recommended. This should be done on a time and materials cost basis. Further - • 6" pop -up sprinkler heads cost approximately $10.00 per head. • 12" pop -up sprinkler heads cost approximately $15.00 per head. • Labor to install the heads cost approximately $35.00 per hour • Based on approx. 88 heads times 14 blocks plus the south segment equals about 1,300 heads requiring excavating and adjustment (either total replacement, nozzle adjustment or change out) 1300 heads x $12.00 per head = $15,600 130 hours x $35.00 labor cost= $ 4,550 Sub - total: $20,150 Landscape Materials t Based on the March 12, 2001 below is the approximate list of estimated plant materials missing. An exact plant material quantity count will be required pending confirmation of available funds and any approved alternate plant material selected to be installed. uanti Plant Type Unit Cost Amount 126 ea Liriope $ 5.00 $600.00 12 ea Red Fountain Grass $13.00 $156.00 12 ea White Fountain Grass $13.00 $156.00 120 ea Juniper $13.00 $1,560.00 120 ea Aztec Grass $ 5.00 $600.00 6 ea Indian Hawthorne $13.00 $ 78.00 40 ea Ixora $13.00 . $520.00 60 ea Purple Queen $ 5.00 $300.00 3200 sq. ft. $ .50 $1,600.00 Sub - total: $5,570.00 Mulch • 9,500 - 2 -cu.ft. bags at $3.00/bag plus $1.00 installation Totals approx. $38,000.00 Cost Estimate Recap: Irrigation $21,150 Plant Materials $ 5,570 Mulch $38.000 Total Estimate: $64,720 ATTACHMENT N0. PAGE OF N®.j'_ APP AQ( 2001 Pg. 16J 2 EXECUTIVE SUNTLVLkRY AN ORDINANCE CREATING THE VA.NDERBILT BEACH BEAUTIFICATION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXIING UNIT; PROVIDING THE AUTHORITY; PROVIDNG FOR THE CREATION; PROVIDING A PURPOSE JUND GOVERNING BODY; PROVIDING FUNDING AND THE LEVY OF NOT TO EXCEED 0.5 MILS OF AD VALOREM TAXES PER YEAR; PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF TAXES; PROVIDING FOR CREATION OF THE VANDERBILT BEACH BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE; APPOINTMENT AND COMPOSITION; PROVIDING FOR TERNT IS OF OFFICE OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE; PROVIDING FOR OFFICERS OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE; QUORUM; RULES OF PROCEDURE; PROVIDING FOR FUNCTIONS, POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE; PROVIDING FOR DUTIES OF THE COUNTY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE; PROVIDING FOR REVIEW PROCESS OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. OBJECTIVE: That the Board adopt an Ordinance creating a Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU) for the purpose of providing maintenance and operational funding for the existing landscaping improvements along the west side of Vanderbilt Drive from Vanderbilt Beach Road to 11 I'h Avenue and for future area -wide improvement projects. CONSIDERATIONS: On April 24, 2001, the Board approved agenda item 16(B)(12) directing staff to go forward with creation of an MSTU for maintenance and funding for existing landscaping improvements along the west side of Vanderbilt Drive as noted above. To that end, staff prepared the attached Ordinance, which was reviewed and approved by the County Attorney's Office. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact at this time, however, if the Board adopts the attached Ordinance, staff will include the required amount in the FY 2002 -03 budget request. Annual maintenance and administrative costs are estimated at $80,000. A 0.5 mill cap will be sufficient to fund this MSTU if created. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: That the Board adopt an Ordinance creating the Vanderbilt Beach Beautification MSTU. i SUBMITTED BY: 9Larguita Kind F / DATE: 5/24/01 REVIEWED BY: APPROVED BY: DATE: `--'L-< Edward J% Kant,'- -7; Transportation Operations Director D E.~F der, AICPsportation Administrator P9 j 16J 2 1 SECTION TWO. Creation of the Municipal Service Taxing Unit 2 3 There is hereby created and established the Vanderbilt Beach Beautification Municipal 4 Service Taxing Unit, hereinafter referred to as "MSTU ". The boundaries of the MSTU are as 5 described on the attached Exhibit "A" that is incorporated herein by reference. 6 SECTION TAE. Purpose and Governing Body 7 The MSTU is created for the purpose of (1) Providing curbing, watering facilities, 8 plantings and maintenance of the median strips and right -of -way edges of roadways within the 9 MSTU; (2) Providing traffic calming improvements, street lighting, and sidewalks within the 10 MSTU; and (3) Beautification and maintenance of other public areas within the MSTU as 11 determined by the Advisory Committee. The governing body of the MSTU shall be the Board of 12 County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. 13 SECTION FOUR Funding and Levy of Taxes 14 For the purpose of implementing this Ordinance, the Board of County Commissioners 15 shall annually, at the time required by general budgetary law, make an itemized estimate of the 16 amount of money required to carry out the business of the MSTU for the next fiscal year, which 17 shall be from October 1 to and including September 30 following. The estimate shall describe i 18 the purpose for which the.moueys are required and the amount necessary to be raised by taxation 19 within the MSTU. At the time and place for fixing the annual rate of taxation for County 20 purposes, the Board of County Commissioners shall fix and cause to be levied on all properties 21 within the MSTU, subject to taxation, a millage rate not to exceed 0.5 mils per year. ' 22 SECTION FIVE. Tax Assessment and Collection 23 Taxes herein provided for shall be assessed and collected in the same manner and form as 24 provided for the assessment and collection of general County taxes and subject to the same fees 25 for assessing and collecting as general County taxes. 26 SECTION SIX. Creation of the Vanderbilt Beach Beautification Advisory 27 Committee; Appointment and Composition 28 29 A. There is hereby created and established the Vanderbilt Beach Beautification Advisory 30 Committee, hereinafter referred to as the "Committee ". 31 B. The Committee shall consist of five (5) members that generally represent the area within the 32 MSTU. Members of the Committee shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the 33 Board of County Commissioners. Said members shall be permane 71iL l � Page 2 of 6 r� 16J 2 11 1 SECTION NINE. Functions, Powers and Duties of the Advisory Committee 2 3 The functions, powers and duties of the Committee shall be as follows: 4 A. To aid and assist the Board of County Commissioners in carrying out the purposes of the 5 MSTU as set forth in this Ordinance. 6 B. To prepare and recommend to the Board of County Commissioners an itemized budget of the 7 amount of money required to carry out the business of the MSTU for the next fiscal year. In 8 carrying out this responsibility, the Committee shall, no later than April 1 of each year, meet 9 with the County Manager or his designee and outline to the County Manager or his designee 10 those projects which the Committee wishes to see accomplished during the next fiscal year. 11 Based upon this information, the County Manager or his designee shall prepare a proposed 12 budget for the MSTU, in accordance with standard County guidelines regarding the 13 preparation of budgets. This proposed budget shall then be reviewed by the Committee and, 14 upon approval by the Committee, be transmitted through the County Manager or his designee 15 to the Board of County Commissioners for adoption in accordance with procedures for the 16 adoption of budgets set forth under general law and the Board of County Commissioners' 17 policy. Should the Committee fail to approve a budget by June 1 of each year, the County 18 Manager or his designee shall be authorized to submit a proposed budget to the Board of 19 County Commissioners. 20 C. The Committee shall recommend work programs and priorities to the County Manager or his 21 designee in accordance with the adopted budget or budget amendments that may be adopted 22 by the Board of County Commissioners. The execution of work programs shall be under the 23 direct supervision and responsibility of the County Manager or his designee. Said work may 24 be performed under contract (in accordance with law) or by County forces. 25 D. The Committee may adopt and amend "Guidelines" to govern its operation and the operation 26 of the MSTU, subject to approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 27 SECTION TEN. Duties of the County Manager or His Designee 28 The duties of the County Manager or his designee shall be: 29 A. To administer the activities of the MSTU in accordance with established policies of the 30 Board of County Commissioners and guidelines adopted by the Committee. 31 B. To prepare the annual budget in accordance with Section Nine, Paragraph B, above. 'AGE ll"i ITPAI A J U '001 T Page 4 of 6 i 16J 2 Exhibit "A" All of that property lying westerly of the centerline of Vanderbilt Drive from Vanderbilt Beach Road north to the centerline of the Little Horse Pass Bridge (Collier County Bridge No. 030177); thence, westerly along the meander line of the Cocohatchee River until it meets the Gulf of Mexico. Said lands being more fully depicted on the drawing below: rage n nr n A J U t_ J I LUU 1 4 16J Z EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE BID #01 -3258, "VANDERBILT DRIVE BEAUTIFICATION GROUNE MAINTENANCE." OBJECTIVE: To obtain Board approval for the award of Bid #01 -3258 for the Vanderbilt Dr�,Ile Beautification Roadway Grounds Maintenance to Commercial Land Maintenance, Inc. CONSIDERATIONS: On July 10, 2001, the Purchasing Department sent notices to 51 vendors for grounds maintenance of the Vanderbilt Drive Beautification roadway. 2. On July 19, 2001, a non - mandatory pre -bid meeting was held. 3. On July 27, 2001, four (4) bids were opened. Staff reviewed the unit pricing on the bid tab, and Advanced Lawn & Landscaping Service Inc. submitted the lowest bid. Since the bid opening, Advanced Lawn & Landscaping Service Inc. has met with staff to further review the contract requirements. Both parties have mutually agreed that the offer from Advanced Lawn does not cover the scope of services required. The bidder has subsequently formally withdrawn their offer. Accordingly, Staff recommends that the bid be awarded to Commercial Land Maintenance, Inc. 4. Staff recommends award of this bid to Commercial Land Maintenance, Inc. as the second lowest, most qualified, and responsive bidder, due to Advanced Lawn & Landscaping Service, Inc., submission of their letter of non - interest. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $43,755.25 are budgeted in the General MSTD Fund 111 in Fiscal Year 2001 -2002. These funds are to be repaid back to the General MSTD Fund 111 by the Vanderbilt Drive Beautification Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU), once the MSTU funds are available. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: There is no growth management impact. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board award Bid #01 -3258 to Commercial Land Maintenance, Inc. for the Vanderbilt Drive Beautification Grounds Maintenance and authorize the Chairman to execute the standar ntract - (review by the County Attorney's Office. PREPARED BY: � `' � �- DATE: 2 -Cl Bob F?etersen, Engineer II, Landscape Operations REVIEWED BY: REVIEWED BY: REVIEWED BY: REVIEWED BY: < DATE: Pa Lulich, , { La c4pe Opera bons Manager DATE: Edward J. Kdirf."R ransportation Operations Director DATE: z Purchasing Director DATE: NohanE. F€d4r, AICP, Transportation Administrator R .NL� { EM No. � Pg. EP 2 a 2001 N • � G � � U `n ayi a �•cna U Z a a `c � G V � C � a �Q L G C u b 6l .1 ^J •v Q V7 Q a R u e� •G4 a� w A 6. N C m � ° C � r A L y 4.. < U � � ,D 1F�J 2 1 � p ISJ t C Q Lr, e C a 1 E IL 7- i N tT l9 CL M M N W N W /R d► H W y 69 V! V# M H M 69 y1 64 b4 /R d► N di M O O O R O° co N cz M N t0 M `_ N L to N N O 69 64 6R Ni 6R VY 6R V% 6R Vi 69 1R 6A 1R !Pr N 0 0 o Vn co 00 co cn N M m C t.Oj CO N M tD C1 O '= T T co O �i 59 M 69 bl 6R M 69 di 69 W SR M 69 N !A .N► OC OO 00 O O 0 00 Of �^ l� M 0 N T C; M T M !; N r L L. • 69 Ml 6091 f/> to eA V► 40 N w V► o° °p O O O N `n O N O ° 00 O '.•C. N ^ M O 07 O CO N �"? 73 d N r N t^ M t!1 r r r N Nf;R:;:. 7 Q,' 6R eH 69 w M 69 V► 69 Vs M! !p in 00 N V7 t^ t^ to .... G U H U U U� U U V L _ U a d b o R � � � Q • Lam. a, bn ❑ a +�. .c ` �Q' W o� OC O C Cn G N on u C b E y w rn o � m i 1 ~" 1F�J 2 1 � p ISJ t C Q Lr, e C a 1 E IL 7- i N tT l9 CL kn cn 0 to tj co co COO O C. O 4t r4 75 7 rt 16J 2 r. m IO Q. ------------------- wo - ------ 40* too- --------- w w — — — — — — — — I In— —1 — — — — 40 — 419, Oil w w 4010, o q CD CD CD Lo U") co Q'I CD -0 co C= co CD C14 co c1t Ot N Cq m 60� 69 60. CD C� CD R F4 M 00 M O w eq Ln 00 w N co go ,7 a) to). 64 60). 69 4191 --- O ----------- = = = O = <5 0= = O 8 CD C= =; CD CD W) w I�r s. W) C14 co tn W1 Cq to cli 401, 6H 40). 619 w w 69 40, 63 Vol 1 400.1 Vill ------------------- CD R CD . CD R tn C, In kn CD ci Wi CD tn kn cel m C14 61% V1. co a) b cc Ccu 6. d) C4 fd cr CD Ud "Cl 42 C, i7i C11 Ga 0.0 wry r. m IO Q. wo r. m IO Q. 16J 2 O Q N In LLI O 7 N CT m a_ y► H H w w H H V1, w w A N H H H H H H w H w ••°I N N H H w w w w w H w •• tn to N p CD O p O O p p 0 O p p O O O p O O O O O O O O O CR p O O O p p O O O O U 04 C O C to c0 O co to ,,•,.t O N M "'� N N '—i O yCn O N Ch N 'co cn O tD rn to to J E -w z c a 69 w 6R H 69 w 6R H 6R H 69 w 69 64 64 H 69 H O N to h C O O O O O p O O p p O O p O O O O O O O O to O O O O O O O O o O N H 0D M to p Uj CD f CD If; O ° OO . C Ln N N N m .� N N N It U \ N C [� 69 w 69 w 69 H 69 w 69 w 69 H 64 69 69 w 6R w 64 w 1 w > p O p O Ln to O N e to K to it1 to to O tn N t0 „y N I, tf R st �' er �' et 7 et sf d' O Cr Q o ,~ to v v v v e a o Q ei O O C., a 69 w 69 w •H H H H H H tn in N O p O C O p 0 O O 0 O O O O o O p O o O p O o O 0 O a co to a co O N O O � N N p tOD M O .-i to ti N r r N C t•7 es y69 w 6R H 69 H 6R H 16,11 H b4 w 1 69 H w N N \p O O 00 C' A U M in y C Ln ci O O a cc z 6. q o z; L= C. A � a�i O O .eC 4 N "Cl c �'' C 3 (� cl f 'fl Q rr h a. y C �." V CC r• .�C > at N Q E� U U u, C7 C7 cn cC O d L L a�i 01 r� 1� i •O ILU a E-- 0 a A G.+ w I O Q N In LLI O 7 N CT m a_ 16J 2 �. cV N l 0 ups-- °- � r G� a0 7 tT (0 p 0 p 0 p 0 p 0 p -O O a C C C t!1 C C C C to p o p o p o p o p O O o O O O N O O O O N t(1 [� n In Q CD � N �` •-� N tn � to tt 00 N R' 69 N 6/± fR 69 64 1611 6A 1 69 ; VII I 69 fl3 69 6Ri 6*? 69 6R b9 619 619 69 O O O O O O 1= O O O O O kn O O O O to O O O O C R O O O O C- to t!1 OC: tlj \1D cn O o t- N 7 00 O M O O to �` co � .r M 00 M O G1 '[P �t 1-4 r•i G1 et P- M 00 to M 69 69 69 IA 69 "1 69 64 69 64 64 69 69 69 6R 69 69 69 6'9 O O O O O O O O C O 00 O O O 00 O O 00 O 00 00 "T, O � M en 00 00 N M a ds t/! M a4 I'll i 6011 1 69 11, In 69 69 "l C C C O O O C O a O C O O O kn 0 0 0 0 to C O O R R a O O O N O O C O N O p O c C o O to L O C 4= O O O •-+ O N tIy O 00 .� C N N M .-� u C O C O 00 N �D "T O O M to to O to \�p ep N M 6r4 M 69 W '69 69 6R tR 69 lfl 69 4* 64 69 69 69 69 69 619 69 69 to h ° U W) ° U U a = � � � r� � > G fi � "' ,� � ice'+ °� i � •L �; y +�+ W2 O eC E c° U °: e �: E U cc L' O cC N co co Li G .in CJ N Q H ° � R �. cV N l 0 ups-- °- � r G� a0 7 tT (0 16J 2 0 N U-) d, G!? N 4 I I t --I- C O o O O to N to [-� O O o O C to N O o O 0 C 0 O C o o O O C C O 0 O 00 O O C O O N O O M C\ \.0 to to 1�0 M 7 CN N 69 b9 6> Ge 69 6A " 60,1 6A 64 69 64 619 619 69 69 6'i 6A 69 C O C O O aC 7 C 00 -T O O O O O O O C C O O O C O O O O O O O to O to C O O 7 7.!r 7 7 C -t rt N M M to 7 N M 6ri 69 69 64 V9 Cf3 69 69 64 6R b9 6:3 69 V! 64 6A 64 6R 64 O O O O O a0 O� tn M C\ N 01 N O O to C\ O to C to O to to C\ to C; to ON to G\ C to O -+ O .-•+ O O O O O O N N M O CN •-'� 7 N 7 M M M M C' N N to to to in f'I 64 6H 6R 619 6R 69 H" 6R 69 es 69 69 69 6R 6) 69 69 6R C C O C O O C to N to N to t- O O O O to C- O 0 O 0 O 0 C 0 o C 0 O 0 C C to 0 t` 0 to 0 O 0 O ^ M = to to 'IV "IT 7 eT N N M C N 64 69 69 I 69 69 101 " 1,1 6A 61 6R 69 601 69 6R 6g 6R Ef} 160,11 1 3 U U U U V U cU oCj U r�o y cC tj (jU au ` ca > o. O0 °o > ai v E- " a v� a cc (D �' m O � � C fC �--� Q ¢ [A > U L F W, .� co p w "o Ea �? w ' 7 N O w�. CD W C G cc O p �' N q _G U W> V - °❑ C° 0 y cc Go U vi R 0 N U-) d, G!? N 4 16J 2 2 o 0 _ In LLJ O cm � aI C o 0 0 0 0 o v o 0 0 0 o c o 0 0 o c c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o c c In o c o o c o o C o 0 0 0 o C o O g o 0 0 0 0 o v O v O o 0 o C C M ['� In M M M (� M ch M c•i M M In M In 00 In 1- M M O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O o O N O N O C O O H r•y •--� rN rl r-1 r�1 H H H �--i H .-� 69 69 69 69 69 69 W% 1 614 I 69 64 1 69 I 60-Y 69 69 69 69 69 I 69 64 69 VR I I 6R I 609 I 69 1 604. 69 6% 64 619 6013 GR 6R 603 6R O O O O C O O O C O C O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O C O O O C C C C O O O O C O O C O C O O O O O O O q O O O O v O O O N N N N N N N N N N I`1 N N N N N N N N N N In In In In In In In In In In In In In 69 69 6013 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 601 69 69 69 601 69 Go 69 69 69 69 69 69 G09 69 69 6H 69 69 69 69 69 65 601 In o c o 0 0 0 0 o C o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C C v o O C o 0 0 0 o C o 0 0 0 c In In In o In In In In In In In In In C In In In In I. In In In o In In In In o In In In In a N In 7 cn f�1 M M M M M M M M M In \c M `T M 00 N In In N N" N .-� N — — '-+ — — � � � •-•� r-� .-+ .-ti �+ f V r+ � •r rr r� �O 00 �O [� 1�0 110 00 %.O [— 1O 110 1�O �O � 0 f/9 64 69 69 69 64 69 69 69 601 69 I G" 69 69 I 601 69 69 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 1 69 69 69 1 69 69 69 69 69 1 69 69 Gn I 601 I 65 C C O O O O O O O C O O C C C O O O O C O O O O O O O O C C O O O C O O O O O q q O O O O O O O C O O o O C O O M .N-+ —i ..� n .-r '••� ti �+ .r ,-r .r r--i .� �--� .r --i r-r M .-N -� r-ti in N >~ *-� In 00 O C\ In 00 O 'C' O 00 O 00 O C\ O 00 O 00 O 00 O O '-r 69 6A 69 69 69 69 69 69 64 69 1 69 69 1 64 69 69 Go-, 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 69 601 65 U V U U U V U U U U V U U V U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U V y l0 C N = rn y❑ 3 °o a y °o a� h CCI M) E cri [ a� o .a 5 n .^. .0 Z'' �, ^' LI Z coo ?, U m o m a y R° D `a a y' =' no o, 0 o x a .n c 3 ca > .°_° :• ca n[ as >, a C7 0 0 3 o o al c o xQ.�cnHFa3r%��Cn <a >3 a °mouuuu 3> A 16J 2 o IR 0 0 0 IR C IR IR IR 0 IR IR 0 0 IR = ot= trioot =moo= = = = = = = = en IT . 7 N -r N = 7 N rn 0 7 7 N r- en I", " 7 N 'IT C-4 7 N -r cq 7 N = 110 = r- = t- to to h w 0 tn tn tn r- to �m 69 69 64 ff3 64 f!4 G9 6R 69 69 N4 6R 64 6R 69 6R eq wR Gn Ge Gn Go4 fiol3 G9 GR GO-) 69 69 603- GO4 C= C= W4 604 64 Ge 6n 6e filS 60' , 69 64 69 Ge &S 64 &S 69 Ge I 6.3 6411 69 69 Got foR 69 fie Ge rA 69 E.-I 69 O to m O O O O O to M C 00 w 00 00 07 m W) to to tn oo to to in m = m r- w w cu w fA GIs 66 Ge G9 69 EoR 604 6191 fi9 69 fio.) 64 6R SRI 6R GIs Go'll 6141 fig 605 fie Go4 qq Go" (A 601 r.R in 00 U') 00 kn ON to w kn 00 O C O N O to tn CIA to eq to CN kn CN tn CN M CN tn r- in oo to N to N W) N O O to t-- C=; O c; = tti — a; " c; = vi w tri N wi r-- tri N tri r- m N N fq N — 1-4 m m m Itr 7 7 !T 'Tr 7 "Tr m m m m m fig 69 6R U.) G9 Gm, Ge 69 69 64 69 F1-4 69 fie &.f. 6R &R fA 94 &*/ 601. 641) 69 64 fiR 6R fie 9R fiR 604 fig =VIA U U u u U u V U u U U u U, V u u a V u CL) = = Ei ca CD. E 04 1 m cts w m Cc 0 C13 u ", 0 = 44 Cd m U M ca M "I co lcn , . t ........ .. I ............ I L o 16J 2 �o 0 LL) I Cf R R R C R R R R C W = C IR IR 0 IR IR IR l:R IR CR = = = = = = In o o c o 1= C) = = C= = = <= 1= = = = In = In o r- o 00 m en r- in 110 = = In �10 = In en 00 00 N "It cq M m -r en 7r m 69 1 EA GOJ 69 64 S-lll 69 169 &R 1 1 619 1 64 1 GO' I I I 6R 69 69 F/9 6f3 69 69 64 6Ri 6�9 6R 6R = = = = 00 CR O eq 00 C=; 06 t1i Od C=; Od ci 06 1:6 t1i 0 Iri cs In %o O C O C O C O 0 0 rq t- — C\ Q = ell 1= r-- = 14 = t-- "C 00 C\ N 00 C4 m eq M -r cq 'IT rq t Qq eq Goq 6R 169 EA 6A In, 6" 0-� 6 1 64 G6R 6R 64 69 ER 111 r'l 1601111 1 1 G" I 110, a In In M O O 0 C oc In In In In 1= <= = = = C= = <= 11 In r- C In 0 0 0 O O N N (11 (14 in In in In = = = = cm eq en m In �o rn en en en en en M en en M m M V 64 &S 60, 69 I 64 1 6R 1 W) I '1 169 611 I'll I I I 69 f 6q I 6R 69 1 601) W) 6.1 64 69 69 6/3 5R = = = = = In In 0 C! 1= 1= C; o vi tri 6 c; tri if; C'\ C r- O In r^ O O O O In O O in O C-1 t-- In C r'l r-- rn en O In " m 69 foq 6q 91 6e 601) 64 169 60-11 r., 69 69 60, I'll 11 61,110, CD p z; O O O O vl d-a C-M 42Z -Ca I-M O Q U C Q u O u y d-a In cn cn In C4 VI cn C/) CIO rA ca -C� cc P. a. Itz ct� N-7 > CD CD CD C) CD CD 0 P r. r. r. 0 V11 CD <D 0 cl Cd u 0 C) C> E E cc ca m m cc cc cc ca ❑ 0 0 CLO (U to Ctl 1 -14 Q 7.3 u >' -IM d) U %I P- = -0 -0 cc > > u cc ca m cis cn U) 2 u cn 4� > u Cn- 16J 2 o E N un LU C�1 O CD N d ds 00 0 o co �o ~ M N N 609 f9 69 N► O O O O O O O O O O O O O .r N 00 tp N 6�9 6R f/9 eR O O O O O O O O O O O c O tn In O c0 N N M d4 es 69 b9 O O O O O o tn tn O cC O ti ° V., 6A 6R 49 .O , O N U O [ N U — N O O O O z za.z;zVz V ;-' p L O .r O N -a 4 O •Y+ N L O •Q' O L" O � c z d a a) d a u a 4. as F" ° a a �? F. y U 0 3 co A. o a°i R. C 1. ul U 4r N 0 R .. C/) Q vl +r r Ol! y h •� 16J 2 o E N un LU C�1 O CD N d 16J 2 .4 9' 200 1. Meeting called to order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of December 14, 2001 4. Landscape Maintenance Report 5. Landscape Architect's Report - Mike McGee 6. Transportation Landscape Services Report — Val Prince, Robert Peter5en A. Current budget B. Recuperation for accident damages C. Ditch clean out P. Lights at Poral 7. Committee Members' Reports A. Review of Ordinance — members' comments 8. Old l3uoine55 A. Restoration of curbing to 6" 9. New Busine55 10. Public Comments 11. Adjournment 16J 2 .LeCy G06FEstates Beautification Advisory Committee 'Minutes - Neeting of December 14, 2001 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS & MOTIONS: 3. Minutes of November 9" — Robert Cole made a motion to accept the minutes as submitted; seconded by Robert Weyers and carried unanimously. 6. TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS REPORT C. Val Prince introduced a new ordinance to the committee that was to be voted on at the last Commissioners' meeting. No information concerning this ordinance had been presented, hinted or discussed with any of the existing MSTU committees or their representatives. In fact, no one had even seen a copy of the document for review. Chairman Pearson was alerted to these facts and made several phone calls to Commissioner Fiala requesting that this item be removed from their agenda until a review of the ordinance and its impact on the Lely MSTU can be ascertained. Consequently, the item was removed from the BCC agenda, copies of same were provided, and a discussion will take place during next month's meeting. 16J 2 LeCy Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee .Minutes - - Meeting of December 14,200-1 1. Meeting called to order at 4:05 p.m. 2. Location — Transportation Operations Department Conference Room. 3. Attendance Taken: Present — George Pearson, Robert Cole, Robert Weyers, members; Bob Petersen and Val Prince, Transportation Services; Robert Kindelan, Commercial Land Maintenance; Mike McGee, McGee & Associates; Jacqueline Silano, recording secretary. Excused Absence: Bill Erickson and Bob Slebodnik, members. 4. Minutes of November 9" — Robert Cole made a motion to accept the minutes as submitted; seconded by Robert Weyers and carried unanimously. 5. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT A. Robert Kindelan reported that the irrigation and most of the landscaping has been completed on the Median 5 redesign. They are still looking for 4-6 suitable trees. The committee expressed their satisfaction on the outcome. B. The water plant has been on and off and Mr. Pratt advised Mr. Kindelan that they would be placed on their fax notification list when the water will be turned off for more than 24 hours. There will be sporadic turn offs during the day. Mr. McGee questioned whether the holding tank belongs to them or the County and felt it would be better to tap directly into the tank, if possible. C. The rest of the. project is in routine maintenance mode. D. The spotlights a Doral are not working and the sockets may be corroded. E.B. Simmons were called last meeting but still have not fixed the problem. 6. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S REPORT A. Mike McGee noted that the project is in good condition. There are small areas that will need plant replacement and some turf areas need to be sprayed with fungicide. There are some problem areas with carpet grass. B. Median 5 looks good. The irrigation is on the fringe of maximum pressure but is still holding at 60 psi. 7. TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS REPORT A. Copies of the updated budget statements were provided and reviewed. The transferred funds should be reflected in next month's statement. 16J 2 B. Mr. Prince advised that he sent an e-mail regarding the recuperation of funds for accident damages. He is awaiting a response. C. Val Prince introduced a new ordinance to the committee that was to be voted on at the last Commissioners' meeting. No information concerning this ordinance had been presented, hinted or discussed with any of the existing MSTU committees or their representatives. In fact, no one had even seen a copy of the document for review. Chairman Pearson was alerted to these facts and made several phone calls to Commissioner Fiala requesting that this item be removed from their agenda until a review of the ordinance and its impact on the Lely MSTU can be ascertained. Consequently, the item was removed from the BCC agenda, copies of same were provided, and a discussion will take place during next month's meeting. D. Val Prince said he provided Mr. Harry Acres with Mr. Slebodnik's phone number so that he could contact him regarding the clean out of the ditch. E. For comparison purposed, Mr. Prince will provide the committee with water bills at next month's meeting. (Mr. Prince left at 4:35 p.m.) 8. OLD BUSINESS A. George Pearson met with a County representative from Road and Bridge regarding the restoration of the median curbing to 6" but has not had a response yet. 9. COMMITTEE REPORTS A. George Pearson spoke with George Ramsey of the Lely Civic Association and reported that they have speed bumps on their January agenda. He also advised that new street signs would be installed in the entire subdivision. The Lely Civic Association has also written to Commissioner Fiala regarding speed limits. B. Mr. Pearson has. obtained some reflective tape that he will install on the median tips. Because the neighborhood streets are so dark, Mr. Pearson suggested that solar cell streetlamps should be investigated. Mr. Petersen advised him to contact Marquita regarding county funding of streetlights. As there was no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 4:45 p.m. The next scheduled meeting will be held on January 11"' @ 4:00 p.m. at the Transportation Operations conference room on South Horseshoe Drive. February 8, 2001 LeCy Goff Estates Beautification ,Advisory Committee Page 2 of 2 a � - 1 ii''i co ORDINANCE NO. 2001- 43 I ► I� 1 S 1; P9 is n �+ L - 3 r ti AN ORDINANCE CREATING THE VANDERBILT BEACH grot , BEAUTIFICATION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT; PROVIDING THE AUTHORITY; PROVIDING FOR THE CREATION; PROVIDING A PURPOSE AND GOVERNING BODY; PROVIDING FUNDING AND THE LEVY OF NOT TO EXCEED 0.5 MILS OF AD VALOREM TAXES PER YEAR; PROVIDING FOR THE COLLECTION OF TAXES; PROVIDING FOR CREATION OF THE VANDERBILT BEACH BEAUTIFICATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE; APPOINTMENT AND COMPOSITION; PROVIDING FOR TERMS OF OFFICE OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE; PROVIDING FOR OFFICERS OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE; QUORUM; RULES OF PROCEDURE; PROVIDING FOR FUNCTIONS, POWERS AND DUTIES OF THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE; PROVIDING FOR DUTIES OF THE COUNTY MANAGER OR HIS DESIGNEE; PROVIDING FOR REVIEW PROCESS OF ADVISORY COMMITTEE; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR INCLUSION IN THE COLLIER COUNTY CODE OF LAWS AND ORDINANCES; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Vanderbilt Drive between Vanderbilt Beach Road and Bluebill Avenue has been improved with the addition of landscaping and a sidewalk; and WHEREAS, the County has received inquiries from the Vanderbilt Beach Propoerty Owners' Association ( VBPOA) relating to the maintenance of the aforesaid improvements; and WHEREAS, the VBPOA has also inquired about the potential for futur rcraments within the Vanderbilt Beach area; andc;: WHEREAS, the Vanderbilt Beach area does not otherwise qualify for dtevyy" Pn "Arterial" status and, therefore, there is little opportunity for public funding `'ef dditiona y landscape or other improvements in the future; and ,,rn WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that the best method for funding the maintenance of existing improvements and for funding any desired future improvements within the area known as the Vanderbilt Beach area is by the creation of the Vanderbilt Beach Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE. Authority This Ordinance is adopted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 125, Chapter 165 and Chapter 200, Florida Statutes, and other applicable provisions of law. Page 1 of 6 16J 2 SECTION TWO. Creation of the Municipal Service Taxing Unit There is hereby created and established the Vanderbilt Beach Beautification Municipal Service Taxing Unit, hereinafter referred to as "MSTU ". The boundaries of the MSTU are as described on the attached Exhibit "A" that is incorporated herein by reference. SECTION THREE. Purpose and Governing Body The MSTU is created for the purpose of. (1) Providing curbing, watering facilities, plantings and maintenance of the median strips and right -of -way edges of roadways,within the MSTU; (2) Providing traffic calming improvements, street lighting, and sidewalks within the MSTU; and (3) Beautification and maintenance of other public areas within the MSTU as determined by the Advisory Committee. The governing body of the MSTU shall be the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. SECTION FOUR. Funding and Levy of Taxes For the purpose of implementing this Ordinance, the Board of County Commissioners shall annually, at the time required by general budgetary law, make an itemized estimate of the amount of money required to carry out the business of the MSTU for the next fiscal year, which shall be from October 1 to and including September 30 following. The estimate shall describe the purpose for which the moneys are required and the amount necessary to be raised by taxation within the MSTU. At the time and place for fixing the annual rate of taxation for County purposes, the Board of County Commissioners shall fix and cause to be levied on all properties within the MSTU, subject to taxation, a millage rate not to exceed 0.5 mils per year. SECTION FIVE. Tax Assessment and Collection Taxes herein provided for shall be assessed and collected in the same manner and form as provided for the assessment and collection of general County taxes and subject to the same fees for assessing and collecting as general County taxes. SECTION SIX. Creation of the Vanderbilt Beach Beautification Advisory Committee; Appointment and Composition A. There is hereby created and established the Vanderbilt Beach Beautification Advisory Committee, hereinafter referred to as the "Committee ". B. The Committee shall consist of five (5) members that generally represent the area within the MSTU. Members of the Committee shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Board of County Commissioners. Said members shall be permanent residents within the Page 2 of 6 16J 2 MSTU and electors of Collier County. The Board of County Commissioners shall consider appointment of members from different subdivisions or communities within the MSTU. C. Appointment of members to the Committee shall be by resolution of the Board of County Commissioners, which resolution shall set forth the date of appointment and the term of office. D. Members of the Committee shall serve without compensation, but shall be entitled to receive reimbursement for expenses reasonably incurred in the performance of their duties upon prior approval of the Board of County Commissioners. SECTION SEVEN. Terms of Office of the Advisory Committee The initial terms of office of the Committee shall be as follows: A. Two (2) members shall be appointed for a term of two (2) years. B. Two (2) members shall be appointed for a term of three (3) years. C. One (1) member shall be appointed for a term of four (4) years. Thereafter, each appointment or reappointment shall be for a term of four (4) years. Appointments to fill any vacancies on the Committee shall be for the remainder of the unexpired term of office. SECTION EIGHT. Officers of the Advisory Committee; Quorum; Rules of Procedure A. At its earliest opportunity, the membership of the Committee shall elect a chairman and vice chairman from among the members. Officer's terms shall be for one (l) year, with eligibility for re- election. B. The presence of three (3) or more members shall constitute a quorum of the Committee necessary to take action and transact business. C. The Committee shall, by majority vote of the entire membership, adopt rules of procedure for the transaction of business and shall keep a written record of meetings, resolutions, findings and determinations. Copies of all Committee minutes, resolutions, reports, and. exhibits shall be submitted to the Board of County Commissioners. D. Committee member attendance requirements, including failure to attend meetings and member removal from office are governed by Ordinance No. 86 -41, as amended, or by its successor Ordinance. Page 3 of 6 8 16J 2 SECTION NINE. Functions, Powers and Duties of the Advisory Committee The functions, powers and duties of the Committee shall be as follows: A. To aid and assist the Board of County Commissioners in carrying out the purposes of the MSTU as set forth in this Ordinance. B. To prepare and recommend to the Board of County Commissioners an itemized budget of the amount of money required to carry out the business of the MSTU for the next fiscal year. In carrying out this responsibility, the Committee shall, no later than April 1 of each year, meet with the County Manager or his designee and outline to the County Manager or his designee those projects which the Committee wishes to see accomplished during the next fiscal year. Based upon this information, the County Manager or his designee shall prepare a proposed budget for the MSTU, in accordance with standard County guidelines regarding the ' • 4 preparation of budgets. This proposed budget shall then be reviewed by the Committee and, upon approval by the Committee, be transmitted through the County Manager or his designee to the Board of County Commissioners for adoption in accordance with procedures for the adoption of budgets set forth under general law and the Board of County Commissioners' policy. Should the Committee fail to approve a budget by June 1 of each year, the County Manager or his designee shall be authorized to submit a proposed budget to the Board of County Commissioners. C. The Committee shall recommend work programs and priorities to the County Manager or his designee in accordance with the adopted budget or budget amendments that may be adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. The execution of work programs shall be under the direct supervision and responsibility of the County Manager or his designee. Said work may be performed under contract (in accordance with law) or by County forces. D. The Committee may adopt and amend "Guidelines" to govern its operation and the operation of the MSTU, subject to approval by the Board of County Commissioners. SECTION TEN. Duties of the County Manager or His Designee The duties of the County Manager or his designee shall be: A. To administer the activities of the MSTU in accordance with established policies of the Board of County Commissioners and guidelines adopted by the Committee. B. To prepare the annual budget in accordance with Section Nine, Paragraph B, above. Page 4 of 6 16J 2 C. To provide periodic written reports to the Committee, and the Board of County Commissioners of the activities of the MSTU and its finances in accordance with established guidelines of the Board of County Commissioners and /or the Committee. D. Attend all Committee meetings. SECTION ELEVEN. Review Process This Advisory Committee shall be reviewed once every four (4) years commencing 2004, in accordance with the procedures contained in Collier County Ordinance No. 86 -41, as amended, or its successor Ordinances. SECTION TWELVE. Conflict and Severability In the event this Ordinance conflicts with any other Ordinance of Collier County or other applicable law, the more restrictive shall apply. If any court of competent jurisdiction holds any phrase or portion of this Ordinance invalid or unconstitutional, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct and independent provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portion. SECTION THIRTEEN. Inclusion in the Code of Laws and Ordinances The provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the Code of Laws and Ordinances of Collier County, Florida. The sections of the Ordinance may be renumbered or re- lettered to accomplish such, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or any other appropriate word. SECTION FOURTEEN. Effective Date This Ordinance shall be effective upon filing with the Florida Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida this day of , 2001. ATTISST:, r,- BOARD OF COUNTY COM ISSIONERS DWIGHT E. $ROCK,;Cplerk OF COLLIER NTY, F 141f Q 42 By. JAMES ARTER, Ph.D., Chairman �t:t T�t: as to- C1it si nature W4 Approved as to form and Legal Sufficiency:, A Heidi F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney Page 5 of 6 This ordinance filed with the Secretary of tate's Office the & day of ' 2 00 and acknowledgernent4f that foifi recelved t i �---- doy Y 16J 2 Exhibit "A" All of that property lying westerly of the centerline of Vanderbilt Drive from Vanderbilt Beach Road north to the centerline of the Little Horse Pass Bridge (Collier County Bridge No. 030177); thence, westerly along the meander line of the Cocohatchee River until it meets the Gulf of Mexico. Said lands being more frilly depicted on (lie drawing below: Page 6 of 6 16J Z STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial.Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: ORDINANCE NO. 2001 -43 Which was adopted by the Board of County Co'm'missioners on the 31st day of July, 2001, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 1st day ofAugust, 2001. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and Clerk ~ =' Ex- officio to Board of County Commissioners 5 m r B : Maureen Ken on ,- . Deputy Clerk lice. �` r-- P, M w C) v v �- >M tv z G) y C of Cn i� cn O O O I -&I 0 UiCnA N (0 s (D N O O O O co O O O O— O M -+ 0 0 0 0 (O W � m� 9,� c -u - y x r- n 0� z _�= z Xr-XmCCQ2 :XXm :E--jMzimG) mn �DX LUXm ��n� �n��C7n000 ;a X= n� m C/) rn m >� m p Z z >mmnD �rnmD �DG) G) n< M m C �M� y� o r- X (O z 0 m � A` m (mn= D nm m z cim n ) m m OC- m 0 —1 m X M m C X m N W > 1 p w ocnw A ow oC0Co -•o 000 0 0-4 p n O O 0 0 0 0 O Cn O Cn N 0 00CD 0oCD C)o Om 000000000000ivoo Nip Oo00o0000000(noo D v o3W °zv Nvc� o3m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N z 0 Co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 �I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N A N C C P ocnw ow ivc �o 000 o moo - °O °o00 °o °o00 °000 °ocCilo0 omm 00oa00000000ivoo N'Jp 00000CD 000000(noo m N z T n O C c O W N O Co � 0 0-4 o M O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (iii 0 0 N m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 p OOOOOOOOOOOOCnOO N m T v rn ° C m CCD m mo QD0 D p to ONpppppppppp W O° Ov'm s o.016000000000m000 N p -f O Cn 0 0 Co 0 0 0 0 0 o O O O o N A T N O A W P 7' z r O O O o -i N D oo o0O O °o °o °0 0 0 °0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o cn W 0 0 o O o 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 o N rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16J 2 , N 3 C1 CD N T � N ° � M. 0 < -��CD 0 C oW O N C N n w O N m y (o (Y) C C 0 °000° A 0 0 00000000nNioo -s O Ch 00o CD 00 CD 0owIV Oo 00 r Nm 4a ocno00000000.r -Cnoo N A T N O A W P 7' z r O O O o -i N D oo o0O O °o °o °0 0 0 °0 0 0 0 0 0 0 °o cn W 0 0 o O o 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 o N rn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16J 2 , N 3 C1 CD N T � N ° � M. 0 < -��CD 0 C oW O N C N n w O Fiala Carter Henning Coyle V AGENDA 1`6 2 Colette COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY; FEBRUARY 71 2002, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY CLERK 3. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES- LORA JEAN YOUNG, DAVID WOLFLEY 4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Rural Fringe Assessment Area Final Order Comprehensive Plan Amendments. (Coordinator: Stan Litsinger) 5. PUBLIC COMMENT ITEM 6. ADJOURN 2- 7- 02 /CCPC AGENDA /SM /lo t;;�sc. Comes: �«:1; 1 "0. 1 16J 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY FOR COLLIER COUNTY RURAL AND AGRICULTURAL ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL ADVOSRY GROUP (TAG) DRAFT COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) AMENDMENTS ADDRESSING THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE FINAL ORDER (AC- 99 -02) ISSUED BY THE STATE OF FLORIDA ADMINISTRATION COMMISSION ON JUNE 22, 1999, EXCLUDING THE EASTERN LANDS PORTION OF THE RURAL AND AGRICULTURAL ASSESSMENT AREA, FOR WHICH GMP AMENDMENTS ARE REQUIRED BY NOVEMBER 1, 2002. Background: Pursuant to the Final Order imposed by the Governor and Cabinet on June 22, 1999, the State of Florida has mandated certain revisions to Collier County's Growth Management Plan. The Final Order directs the County to conduct a Rural and Agricultural Area Assessment (the "Assessment ") to collect the appropriate data, gather public input and to develop amendments to the Growth Management Plan. Major issues to be addressed by the Assessment include protecting wetlands, wildlife and their habitats, protecting prime or unique agricultural lands from the premature conversion to other uses, and assessing the growth potential of the Area by assessing the potential conversion of these rural lands to other uses, in appropriate locations. All of this is to occur while discouraging urban sprawl, directing incompatible land uses away from critical habitat and encouraging development that utilizes creative land use planning techniques. Such techniques may include, but are not limited to, public and private schools, urban villages, new towns, satellite communities, area -based allocations, clustering and open space provisions and mixed use development. The Final Order allows the County to conduct the Assessment in phases. Accordingly, Collier County has divided the Assessment into two geographical areas, the Rural Fringe Area and the Eastern Lands Area, aka the "Immokalee Area Study" (refer to the Collier County Future Land Use Map (FLUM)). The Final Order requires that the County adopt GMP Amendments developed as a result of the Assessment process by June 22, 2002, excluding the "Eastern Lands Area ", for which adoption of the GMP amendments is required by November 1, 2002. As part of this process, Collier County has established the Rural Fringe Area Oversight Committee (RFAC) and the Eastern Lands Area Oversight Committee (ELAC) to address the planning for each respective area. The Final Order notes that public participation will be the "hallmark" of this planning effort. The primary mechanisms to involve and inform the public and solicit community input during the Assessment process have included: advertised meetings of the advisory committees; an interactive Rural Assessment web site containing all pertinent documents; meeting agendas and minutes; and, several special public meetings and workshops. The RFAC, for example, has held over 50 advertised meetings over the past two years. On June 13, 2001, a Conceptual Report on the Rural Fringe portion of the Assessment process was presented to the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) at a special advertised meeting. All property owners in the Rural Fringe Area were notified by mail of this special meeting. The purpose of the Report (and the special BCC meeting) was as follows: • To inform the Board and the public of the various alternative land use strategies and tools that have been developed by staff and the Rural Fringe Committee (with input from the public stakeholders and from various interest groups); • To respond to questions from the Board and the public regarding these strategies; • To obtain direction from the Board regarding these strategies in order to facilitate the development of specific amendments to the Collier County Growth Management plan, which will address the requirements of the Final Order in this phase of the Assessment for the Rural Fringe lands; and • To allow for additional public input and participation directly to the Board of County Commissioners. 2 It was indicated at the outset that the concepts and recommendations contained in the Report were conceptual and preliminary in nature and therefore were subject to modification as a result of additional RFAC, public stakeholder, interest group, state or federal agency, or BCC comments and recommendations. Such modifications are to be reflected in final transmittal draft GMP amendments to be presented to the advisory boards in late January and early February of 2002, and to the BCC in late February 2002. A copy of the Conceptual Report was sent to each member of the Technical Advisory Group for review and comment. The Report is also available for review at the following URL: www.collieraov.net /commdev /rural fringe concept.htm Considerations: The strategies contained in the Conceptual Report, and now provided herein, are intended to address the requirements of the Final Order in such a way as to balance private property rights with strategies to protect the County's vast natural resources, particularly wetlands and listed species and their habitat. The major policy issues addressed through these proposed GMP amendments are as follows: • Protection of wetlands and listed species and their habitat; • Upland protection measures; • Measures to protect private property rights; • Discouraging urban sprawl; • Impacts to adjacent public lands, • Economic impacts; and, • Conversion of rural lands to other land uses. It should be noted that the Final Order also called for the development of measures to protect agricultural land, and to foster the continued economic viability of Agri- business in Collier County. In part, this will be accomplished through strategies (in the form of Comprehensive Plan Goals, Policies and Objectives) that prevent the premature conversion of agricultural lands. By far, the vast majority of agricultural operations in Collier County occur in the Eastern Lands Area portion of the Assessment Area. By comparison, in the Rural Fringe Area, only 19% of the land is currently in agricultural use and less than 3% is being used for more intensive agricultural operations such as row crops, citrus and nurseries. The agricultural land uses within the Fringe Area represent only 6% of the total land area within the Assessment Area. For this reason, measures to prevent the premature conversion of agricultural lands and to foster the continued economic viability of Agri- business in Collier County will be addressed as part of the Eastern Lands Area portion of the Assessment. Nevertheless, certain provisions, such as Transfer of Development Rights (TDR), Clustering, and Rural Villages, developed through the Rural Fringe Assessment process primarily as strategies to protect natural resources and .private property rights, may also collaterally have the effect of fostering the economic viability of Agri- business and reducing the premature conversion of agricultural lands. The attached GMP amendments may apply to specific areas of the County, such as the proposed Rural Fringe Mixed Use District, or may apply universally throughout the County, such as the proposed wetland and wildlife protection policies. [Note: any policies which are intended to apply Countywide do not apply to the portion of the Assessment identified on the FLUE as the Eastern Lands Area (aka the Immokalee Study Area), as the Assessment for this area has not yet been completed.] The Rural Fringe Mixed Use District represents a transitional area between suburban lands in Golden Gate Estates and the County's urban lands, and between the urban area and the vast natural lands and significant agricultural operations farther to the east. The GMP amendments that apply to the Rural Fringe Mixed Use District have been developed with consideration of the unique characteristics of this transitional area. These amendments, as well as those that apply Countywide, have been developed to address the requirements of 2 der the Final Order in a balanced way in order to protect natural resources, consi potential 16J conversion ather uses in appropriate locations, discourage urban sprawl, and encourage development that utilizes creative land use planning techniques. The Rural Fringe Area contains significant wetlands and valuable wildlife habitat. The data indicates that portions of these lands provide habitat for a number of listed species, including Florida Panthers, Black Bears, Wood Storks, and Red Cockaded Woodpeckers. The GMP Amendments utilize a balanced approach employing both regulations and incentives to address the requirements of the Final Order. Some of the proposed policies are employed at the landscape scale and others at the site - specific scale. In terms of natural resource protection strategies, an American Planning Association Report, entitled Habitat Protection Planning: Where the Wild Things Are, defines these terms as follows i : Landscape Scale "Landscape refers to a large land area (i.e., multiple square miles) that contains habitat for wildlife. A watershed offers an excellent example of what we mean by a landscape. Within a landscape there are usually different types of vegetation arranged in a mosaic, much like a patchwork quilt." Site - Specific Scale "Scale is the relative size of an area of interest. If we focus on a relatively small area, say the area around a house or a single subdivision, our focus is fine scale. If we pay attention to a much larger area, (i.e., a county or a watershed, we are looking at course scale." The report goes on to state, "...development influences wildlife at two fundamentally different scales — the broad `landscape' scale and the more focused `site' [specific] scale... Scale, in turn, determines the usefulness of actions to modify the impacts of development." The utilization for these depends on the development history of a given area. The continuum of development in Collier County extends from the relatively vast and un- urbanized eastern lands, with relatively few owners and parcels, to the "semi - rural" Fringe area and/or to the suburban large -lot platted North Golden Gate Estates, to the predominantly developed urban area. Landscape scale natural resource protection strategies work best in rural areas where large areas of undeveloped land are prevalent. In urban areas, site - specific strategies work best due to the fragmentation of natural areas, but may work in concert with landscape -scale strategies. In the transitional Rural Fringe area, both strategies have been employed to varying degrees to ensure a balance between protection of natural resources and protection of private property rights. Conclusion: We trust that as you review the attached draft GMP amendments, you will conclude that the County has developed a comprehensive set of measurable Goals, Objectives and Policies. These, when employed collectively, will result in the protection of important natural resources by directing uses that are incompatible or detrimental to those resources to more appropriate and less environmentally significant areas of the County. These policies include a number of innovative planning techniques, including regulatory and 1 American Planning Association PAS Report # 470/471 Habitat Protection Planning: Where the Wild Things Are. Christopher J. Duerksen, Donald L. Elliott, N. Thompson Hobbs, Erin Johnson, and James R. Miller. May 1997. 3 i incentive -based policies. 16J Z 1 Over the next 30 days or so, these draft Transmittal GMP amendments will be reviewed by several Collier County advisory Boards, including a final review by the RFAC, the Environmental Advisory Council, and the Planning Commission. Finally, in late February, the BCC will hold a Transmittal Public Hearing on the draft GMP amendments. All of these meetings will be advertised and open to the public in order to allow for additional public participation. In addition to the Draft GMP amendments, the supporting data and analysis is included for your consideration. As indicated in a December 20, 2001 letter from Mike McDaniel, DCA Growth Management Administrator, it is essential that the County be able to consider and make appropriate changes to these draft amendments in response to the review comments of appropriate state and federal agencies. Normally the County would receive these comments in response to Transmittal Amendments distributed after the BCC's approval. In this case, however, given the deadlines imposed by the Final Order, we are distributing the Transmittal draft amendments to identified staff of the various state and federal agencies that make up the TAG, in order to receive feedback prior to the Board's consideration of these amendments. By providing you with the opportunity to become familiar with these GMP amendments, it is hoped that you will be able to expedite your "official" review of the BCC approved Transmittal Amendments, which will be sent to the DCA for the formal review process. Thank you for your time and expertise. Should you have any questions on the amendments or the data and analysis, please feel free to contact the following individuals: William Lorenz, P.E., Collier County Natural Resource Department Director Phone: (941) 732 -2505 Fax: Email: williamlorenzna,collier og_v.net Robert I Mulhere, AICP, Director of Planning RWA, Inc. (Consultant to Collier County) Phone: (941) 649- 1509 Fax: (941) 649 -7056 Email: r m @consult - rwa.com Cc: Nancy Linnan, Carlton Fields Jack Sullivan, Carlton Fields All Members RFAC All Members EAC Tom 011iff, County Manager David Weigel, County Attorney Jim Mudd, Deputy County Manager Joseph K. Schmitt, Community Development & Environmental Services Administrator Marjorie Student, Assistant County Attorney Stan Litsinger, AICP, Comprehensive Planning Manager William Lorenz, P.E., Natural Resources Director KI 0113012002 17:27 7748301 PUB INFO AMENDED NOTICE OF MEETING & AGJM 1-1� PAGE 01102 16J 2 C LLIER COUNTY HISPANIC AFFAIRS ADVISORY BOARD Ca gart er THURSDAY, JANUARY 31, 2002 -- -�,,,�(_� ---- v4ennin9 - ---'✓ 7:00 P.M. Coyle Colette County COI mission Meeting Room Turner Building (Building F), Third Floor Collier County Government Center, Naples, Florida NOTICES Public comments will be .limited to,5 minutes utaless permission for additional time is granted by the Chairman Collier County Ordinance No. 99 -22 requires that all lobbyists shall, before engaging in any lobbying activities (including, but not limited to, addressing the Board of County Commissioners) before the Board of County Commissioners and its advisory boards, register with the Clerk to the Board at the Board Minutes and Records Department. AGENDA I• 7:00 P.M. Meeting called to order and determination of quorum. �Z. Approval of minutes of the .November 29, 2001 meeting. III. Determination of excusal of absences. IV- .Discussions A. Report from Chairman David Correa .regarding endorsement by the Republican Party of the Collier County HAA.BIgarmworkers Resolution. B. 2002 Report to the Board of County Commissioners on this Status of the Hispanic Affairs Advisory Board, C. Proposed Collier County Human Relations Commission Ordinance V. Old Business Follow up discussion re Mr. Nogaj /livi.ng wage concept for agricultural wor`.k.ers VL New Business Misc. Corres: Mr. Lucas Benitez of the Coalition of frnmokalee Faiin Work rstegar ng the --�-- Jan 29, 2002 Imrrligration Issues Protest Item# 1 C0.31 Copies To: 01/30/2002 17:27 VII. VIII. 7748301 Public Comments. Meeting adjourns. PAGE 02/02 16J 2 Fiala Carter Henning i. &�i& ; It �- // 1. Meeting called to order 2. Roll Call 3. Approval of Minutes - Meeting of January 8, 2001 4. Guest's Comments — Jim O'Gara 5. Landscape Maintenance Deport - Robert Kindelan A. Plant replacement estimate 6. Landscape Architect's Report - Mike McGee A. Replacement of dead trees by Hannula B. Light Shield, Part A south end sign C. Donation of trees 7. Transportation Landscape Services Report — Val Prince, Robert Petersen A. Budget Report B. Refurbishment of Sign estimate 8. Committee Members' Reports A. 175 exchange update — Glenn Wilt 9. Old Business 10. New Business 11. Public Comments 12. Adjournment ^ 16J 2 i SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS & MOTIONS 16J 2 3. Approval of the minutes to the December 111' meeting: Clarification of 4A, second paragraph: Mr. McGee said that FDOT standards for median openings require a 450' area free of site obstructions in each direction.... Bonner Bacon moved to approve the minutes as amended; seconded by Phil Mudrak and carried unanimously. 5. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S REPORT B. There are a few areas on the Parkway that are missing plants and will need to be replaced. Mr. McGee suggested replacing them in the spring. Mr. Kindelan will prepare an estimate. E. Mr. McGee recommended improving the entire median on C.R. 951 by Green Boulevard. Currently the contractor maintains just the area around the sign. The committee concurred. 7. NEW BUSINESS D. Glenn Wilt made a motion requesting the use of the Master Plan for signs and lights; seconded by Bonner Bacon and carried unanimously. 16J 2 1. Meeting called to order at 4:08 p.m. at the Golden Gate Community Center. 2. Roll Call - Present: Cheryle Newman, Bonner Bacon, Glenn Wilt, Sabina Musci and Phil Mudrak, members. Robert Petersen and Val Prince, Landscape Operations; Robert Kindelan, Commercial Land Maintenance; Mike McGee, McGee & Associates; Jacqueline Silano, recording secretary. 3. Approval of the minutes to the December 1 V1 meeting: Clarification of 4A, second paragraph: Mr. McGee said that FDOT standards for median openings require a 450' area free of site obstructions in each direction.... Bonner Bacon moved to approve the minutes as amended; seconded by Phil Mudrak and carried unanimously. 4. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT A. Robert Kindelan advised that the mulch on the Parkway was completed by Christmas and -they are currently installing mulch on C. R. 951; minor irrigation problems on the Parkway; a drench will be applied next month which should help the yellowing of the bougainvillea. 5. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S REPORT A. Mr. McGee noted that the landscape maintenance contractor is performing to contract specifications. B. There are a few areas on the Parkway that are missing plants and will need to be replaced. Mr. McGee suggested replacing them in the spring. Mr. Kindelan will prepare an estimate. C. The wet spot at the end of median 16 maybe caused by a cracked pipe which may have been damaged by vehicles driving over it. Mr. McGee suggested bricking that location. D. The Lantana has been installed at the sign; the irrigation should be increased in a few dry areas; Hannula should replace the four dead sables on Part B. E. Mr. McGee recommended improving the entire median on C.R. 951 by Green Boulevard. Currently the contractor maintains just the area around the sign. The committee concurred. 16J 2 6. TRANSPORATION OPERATIONS REPORT A. Mr. Petersen had nothing new to report regarding the school bus stops on Tropicana Boulevard. He noted that the barricades were removed today opening the road to four lanes again. B. With regard to the alleyways; Glenn Wilt received a letter from Ed Kant advising that a survey will have to done. With regard to the mailboxes, he is still awaiting a response. C. Copies of the monthly financial statements were distributed and reviewed. Various "Available Funds" need to be moved to the "Actual Fund Balance" column. D. Bob Petersen advised that a copy of the Board of County Commissioners' waiver of the permit fee mentioned in last month's minutes would be sent out with this month's minutes. 7. NEW BUSINESS A. Mike McGee provided a technical drawing from Lumec of the lights that will be installed along Tropicana Boulevard. A discussion ensued. Relighting Golden Gate Parkway was also mentioned. B. Val Prince advised that several signs have been removed and others will remain within the medians (Le, School Crossing, Pedestrian Crossing.) They may need adjusting per the master plan. There was a brief discussion. Mike estimated that 17 traffic control signs and 10 stop signs would be needed at a cost of approximately $8500 ($250 -$275 per sign.) Some sign and lighting costs may be offset by the County standards. The County will service the new fixtures. C. There was a discussion regarding funding and the possibility of increasing the millage rate temporarily. The maintenance on Tropicana will cost approximately $70,000 annually and if five additional roads are added, the cost will be about $350,000. This will be further discussed when the improvements to Tropicana Boulevard have been completed. D. Glenn Wilt made a motion requesting the use of the Master Plan for signs and lights; seconded by Bonner Bacon and carried unanimously. 8. COMMITTEE REPORTS A. Glenn Wilt brought the committee up to date regarding the 175 interchange. He noted that low -level green decorative lighting would be used between 60°i and 66"' Streets. This may set a standard for the relighting of Golden ,o;, 2, �� 8 �00� �%de ate auj � draa 16J 2 Gate Parkway. He described the bridge columns and planters. Sidewalks will be wider as per the current standard. There is still a question whether or not a sound wall will be needed. ' They are working with a $300,000 budget. Their next meeting will be on January 301. A public meeting has been delayed until more information is available. B. Bonner Bacon suggested placing light shields at the sign at the south end of Part A. He would also like to see some shrubbery there. Mike McGee will look into it. 9. OLD BUSINESS A. With regard to the sign refurbishment at the intersection of C.R. 951 and Golden Gate Parkway, Phil Mudrak recommended using stainless steel bolts. Val Prince is waiting for an estimate for the sign from Signcraft. The committee members will look into obtaining private funding. B. No decision has been made regarding the closure of the median #19. C. Phil Mudrak mentioned that he knows someone who is willing to donate some uncommon trees (Florida Lilac.) He will look into it further with Bob Petersen and Mike McGee. As there was no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 5:35 p.m. The next scheduled meeting will be held on February 12' at 4:00 p.m. at.the Golden Gate Community Center. 6-4 Fiala A Carter Henning Coyle Coletta _ Memorandum To: Sue Filson Executive Assistant, BCC From: Ron Hovell, P.E. Public Utilities Engineering Departm nt, Coastal Projects Manager Date: January 30, 2002 Subject: Coastal Advisory Committee Minutes The subject meeting minutes and public notices are forwarded for submission to the Board of County Commissioners for the following meetings: November 1, 2001 December 6, 2001` January 11, 2002 ✓1:� If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to call me at 530 -5342. RH Attachments it;Su. Corns: Bile: c Z Public Utilities Engineering Depafr'. ei� NapLes Daily News Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily News BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISS CNCRS CHRIS HORiON Po 9OX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101 -3016 REFERENCE: 001230 91532346 58375271 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEE State of Florida County of 01.Lier Before the undersigned authority, personaLLy appeared Angela Bryant, who on oath says that she serves as Assi<tant Secretary of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper) on dates Listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the sav! newspaper has heretofore been continuously published % said Collier County, Florida, each day ai. has b.:a.i entered as second class mail ratter at the post office in NapLes, in -aid Co�Lier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year ,next preceding the first publication of the ittaced copy of advertisement; and af'yiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, �.ommission or refund 'or the purpose of recur ng this advertisement for nuhlir.tion in the sand newspaper. PUBLISKED ON: 01/08 AL SPACE: 73.009 INCH FILED ON: 01/08(02 Signature of Affiant C Sworn to and Subscr-i:oed obi Pers(;nacly known by me 7cL& `<� me thiSA6 An of My Commission DD056336 a Expires September 11, 2005 vol 16J 2 16J 2 Coastal Advisory Committee January 11, 2 Convened at Tigertail Park with Mr. Gray d Mr. Stakich not presen escribed some of the history of what is now a lagoon and he een discussed for improving access such as: - boardwalk over to Sand Dollar peninsula - making a cut from the lagoon to the Gulf at the south end and making Sand Dollar an island again - filling in the lagoon with sand Reconvened at Hideaway Beach. The dune damage was pointed out as well as the route for improving access from Tigertail to Hideaway. The T- groins were discussed as well as the future renourishment of Hideaway Beach. 16J 2 January 11, 2002 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Naples, Florida, January 11, 2002 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee met this date at 3:00 p.m. In REGULAR SESSION at the Frank E. Mackle, Jr., Community Park, 1361 Andalusia Terrace, Marco Island, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: Gary Galleberg VICE CHAIRMAN: David Roellig John P. Strapponi to Ar James — Robert B. Stakich i liam Kroesc e Anthony P. Pires Ashley D. Lupo -, /0 ABSENT: Robert Gray ALSO PRESENT: Ron Hovell, Public Utilities, Beach Renourishment Coordinator. Roy B. Anderson, Public Utilities, Director of Engineering Jon Staiger, Ph.D., City of Naples Natural Resources Director Page 1 16J 2 January 11, 2002 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We will reconvene the meeting of the Coastal Advisory Committee. I will note for the record that we have Mr. Kroeschell, Mr. Roellig, Mr. Snediker, Mr. Stakich and Chairman Galleberg in attendance. We are missing Messrs. Gray, Strapponi, Pires and Ms. Lupo. We have conducted our field trip to Tigertail and Hideaway beaches. Mr. Anderson and Mr. Hovell, do we have any additions to the agenda? MR. ANDERSON: No, we haven't. MR. HOVELL: I just had one maybe quick update. The last time we talked about the Florida Shore and Beach Preservation Association, I just wanted to touch on that briefly. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We can add that as a new item 54(b), then. Moving on to old business, Item 4(a), we have our minutes from the December 6th, 2001 meeting. Do we have any corrections to the minutes? Mr. Kroeschell? MR. KROESCHELL: On Page 47, my remarks, it says "people would not have to get across that area," they would have to get across there, so take the word "not" out. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Mr. Snediker, did I see you with a comment? MR. SNEDIKER: Yes. On Page 44, the second line says, "there's a tremendous amount of water rushing through there," now, but it should be "there was a tremendous amount of water rushing through there." This would be the lagoon at Tigertail. There was a tremendous amount of water, so "there's" should be changed to there was. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. And I had a couple minor changes, which I will state. On the very first page, our typical form is to note absent members and Bob Stakich was absent. On Page 12, there is a reference to Bob Stakich, but it's misspelled. Finally, I had one more, and that is on Page 24, very near the top, the word "community" should be committee. MR. HOVELL: On behalf of Mr. Pires, since he isn't here right now, he had faxed me these corrections. I think you hit the first one on Page 12, Stakich is misspelled, it should be S- t- a- k- i -c -h. On Page 28, down towards the bottom, Mr. Kelly is speaking, and the last part of his sentence is "the greatest fear for the intelligencia of this industry is that we're going to erode the downside drill," it should be fill, not drill. Page 29, sort of in the middle, when the chairman is speaking, it references the word peek, which in there is spelled p- e -e -k, but it should be p- i- q -u -e. And on Page 57, about one -third down, Chairman Galleberg is speaking, and it says Mr. Pires descended, and it should be dissented, d- i- s- s- e- n- t -e -d. (Mr. Strapponi entered the room.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Thank you. I will note for the record that UUM January 11, 2002 Mr. Strapponi has just joined us. 16J 2 Do we have any further changes to the minutes? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Do we have a motion for approval? MR. ROELLIG: Move for approval. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Do we have a second? MR. KROESCHELL: Second. (Mr. Pires entered the room.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We have a motion by Mr. Roellig, a second by Mr. Kroeschell to approve the minutes. All those in favor say Aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Passes eight to zero. I will note that during the vote, including the vote, Mr. Pires came in. I ask everyone who had corrections to provide them to the reporter. Pardon me, the vote was seven to zero. We are still missing two members. I will ask everyone who had those minor corrections to the minutes to provide them to the recording clerk so they can be changed. Mr. Hovell, now Item 4(b), rock removal plan for Naples and Vanderbilt. MR. ANDERSON: Mr. Chairman, I can cover that for you. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. MR. ANDERSON: Basically, we -- pursuant to the order, the consent order from the DEP, we submitted a proposed rock removal plan to the DEP and, you know, using our best judgment and engineering expertise and the state has responded -- is about to respond. We have gotten preliminary feedback from them that they are in disagreement with that plan. They actually had responded to us a little while back, about a month or so ago, basically, putting in a number of conditions, requiring us to at various junctures in the process to submit plans and specifications, to submit reports and our proposal was basically just to go in there, to give them an initial plan and then to go in there and just do it and take care of it once and for all, but yet they are coming back with a number of -- adding a number of steps to the process and we feel that this is exceeding their authority, in essence, because we're really working, you know, we're doing basic maintenance work, so it's probably going to have to lead to a meeting with the state. We do have a new consultant on board, one of our engineering consultants, and we are going to be giving them a work order to provide us with background assistance in order to approach the state and to resolve this once and for all. So to be continued, and this affects the -- this does not affect the Park Shore area because we are able to move forward on that, but it does affect the Naples Beach and Vanderbilt area. Page 3 January 11, 2002 16J 2 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Does anyone have any questions? MR. PIRES: I guess the question is, do you know what their rationale might be or what the motive is behind what they are trying to push, other than that they're in the cat seat, which they probably are? MR. ANDERSON: They are very conservative. There is -- I think there is a -- I think there is a concern, you know, they are afraid of making the wrong decision, perhaps, and they want to have discussion points along the way, they want more information, and I really don't understand what their rationale is. They are just a very conservative organization, but there is a change in the administration up there now, and the indications are that they will look more rationally at, you know, the approach, but beyond that, I don't know what their rationale is. MR. PIRES: Is the concern by staff that it's so open ended because at these decision points they can make you go back and do additional items? MR. ANDERSON: That and also just the bureaucratic hurdles and the time delays. It's just one sequence after another. It could draw the process out interminably. MR. SNEDIKER: That report, the response was made by the old administration; is that correct? MR. ANDERSON: Yes. MR. SNEDIKER: The new staff is in there as of January 1 st? MR. ANDERSON: That's correct. MR. SNEDIKER: There could be a substantial change, would that be fair to say? There could be? MR. ANDERSON: The letter hasn't come out yet, but it was written by the old administration and presumably the new one will be looking at it before it goes out or they just may let it go, but they will be open to a meeting. MR. SNEDIKER: Which engineering consultant? Can you tell us? MR. ANDERSON: Coastal Engineering & Planning. DR. STAIGER: Coastal Planning & Engineering. MR. ANDERSON: Coastal Planning & Engineering. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Are there any other questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I have a couple questions. The first is our materials include a letter from the county attorney's office dated, I believe, December 26th, 2001. MR. ANDERSON: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Are you reporting on developments subsequent to that or is that the same stage of development as the letter? MR. ANDERSON: Subsequent to that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So they are still objecting? MR. ANDERSON: They are still objecting, correct. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And then the second thing I wondered is has anyone January 11, 200 16J 2 developed an estimate -- I understand the plan is not formed yet, that's the whole problem, but what is the estimate of the cost of the rock removal, say, under our plan? MR. ANDERSON: I believe it's in our plan as $200,000 -- no, $400,000. MR. HOVELL: $400,000. MR. ANDERSON: That was an early on estimate. MR. HOVELL: That was a budget estimate back in October based on some assumptions that, you know, the state does not look like they are buying into it at all, and I don't put much stock in the number, I guess, is where I am trying to head. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: You would anticipate it being a bigger number? MR. HOVELL: Yes, I guess the problem is how much bigger. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And I know it can't be this simple, but our materials, the materials from DEP state that this rock plan is in lieu of paying a $5,000 fine. MR. ANDERSON: No, I believe that is in addition to. We have to pay that in any event. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: In addition? MR. ANDERSON: Yes. MR. HOVELL: Well, actually, the $5,000 fine, yes, is in addition to removing the rocks and whatnot, but it was also allowable to say that we would do an environmental restoration, which will be part of the proposal to say we don't want to just write a check for $5,000, we will do some kind of environmental restoration. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And the third question is in the areas of Naples Beach and Vanderbilt Beach where we do have the rock problems, does that take the entirety of Naples Beach out? I realize Park Shore is not part of that, but does it take the entirety of Vanderbilt out or is it possible to section areas in a way that would make some renourishment fruitful in some areas that may not be as rock full as others, so we are not standing around doing nothing at all. MR. ANDERSON: That is part of the initial plan that we'll have to submit and I would envision to parcel it out, we have Vanderbilt and Naples and we can do further subdivisions of that as we move forward, but it's not an all or nothing proposition. There are pieces that can be done. MR. HOVELL: Much like when I came to the City Council, I think it was on the 10th of December for that workshop, and the question was asked can we go just pick up rocks or not and I said well, I don't think so. Well, that is kind of at the heart or at least part of the disagreement between the way the county views things and the way the state views things. On the phone, they have continued to tell me that at least for now their interpretation is that until the plan is approved we don't do anything, and that same kind of issue relates to the question you just asked. The rock removal plan that we filed had a specific DNR reference monuments listed and it started south of R69 and goes down to R76 to do the testing and then potentially removal wherever rocks are found. January 11, 20012161 2 Naples Beach starts up at Doctors Pass, which is north of R58, and so that's part of what I asked him on the phone here recently is there are areas that are not covered by this rock removal plan and therefore we would like to think that we could move forward with starting up by Doctors Pass, with some amount of sand renourishment and, again, their initial reaction is no, but they're willing to discuss it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Even if their position were to hold that we can't do anything until this plan, one would think once there is a plan, there would be defined areas that didn't have a rock problem and at that point, hopefully, we'd move forward in those areas while we remove rocks in other areas. MR. HOVELL: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: The reason I ask, I have had some contact with members of the public who are wondering that, saying we are on Naples Beach, but in our particular area we really don't have rocks, are we going to be the baby thrown out with the bath water on that? MR. ANDERSON: One of the first steps in the process would be to take samples, you know, in the transect areas, the areas going out into the water and as we go through the area, I mean, that has been our approach in this, that as we find areas that are rock free, if you will, then we can proceed to renourish those and the plan would define, you know, how big those areas can be, but it can be incremental. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Anything else? MR. ROELLIG: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Roellig? MR. ROELLIG: I have a question on the coordination with the Vanderbilt Beach people. Have you been involved with the associations up there? You know, in the past, they have been opposed to any rock removal plans. They are happy with what they have, for the most part, as I understand it. So I would recommend that you keep or get in touch with the Vanderbilt Beach Association up there to see what their feelings are on this, because in the past they have always been basically happy with what they have and they are not interested in a big rock removal plan being dumped on them. MR. SNEDIKER: But if the state requires it, then it has to be done so it's more of a case of public relations, or something, to let people know what is going on. MR. ANDERSON: I know we haven't had any meetings with them as such. MR. HOVELL: I'm not sure which association, but Dick Lyden (phonetic), I have been in touch with him by phone and when I went up to whatever yacht club up there to talk about Wiggins Pass dredging, he was there and, you know, he has reiterated numerous times and I guess he was on the previous beach committee and - -- DR. STAIGER: He was chairman. MR. HOVELL: Okay. As you pointed out, he does not agree we need to do anything, he thinks it should be left alone. He doesn't want equipment on the beach January 11, 2002 16J 2 tearing it up, et cetera, which was I think part of the reason why, you know, in the county, we are under the consent order, we're trying to balance those types of interests, but you need to do something. We have been given a consent order. So what we try to do is propose something that was heavy in maintenance and a little lighter in going up and digging the whole beach and removing all the rock, but he's expressed that opinion and I think he's still the president of that association. MR. PIRES: To my knowledge, he's not the president. MR. HOVELL: I thought FI was given his name by the county manager's office when I asked for that point of contact, but I would have to double check. MR. PIRES: I think just recently they had a transition. MR. ROELLIG: I think it's important that they be apprised of any meetings you have with the state and really keep them up in the loop because I hate to see them not be aware of the controversy going on that they have no knowledge of, basically, because it doesn't get reported in the press, particularly, and sometime or another they find out that they are getting some ordinance or requirement placed upon them if they might have some political methods of avoiding. MR. ANDERSON: So, that's the primary organization, Vanderbilt Beach Association? MR. ROELLIG: Well, there are two or three of them up there. DR. STAIGER: I'm not sure, I think it's Vanderbilt Property Owners Association or something. There is Vanderbilt Beach and Bay and there is -- MR. ROELLIG: Two or three of them up there. DR. STAIGER: There are several different associations up there. MR. ANDERSON: Okay. The point is well taken. MR. STRAPPONI: I have a question for Ron in that regard. We are required to test and make an evaluation of the stones. They are of the impression that the stones are not a problem there. More than likely, it's not, but the testing will determine that. MR. ROELLIG: Well, depends on who defines the problem. They don't see a problem but the states does. Unfortunately, the state has better hammers. MR. HOVELL: I think for the most part on any given day, even on Naples Beach, visually it usually isn't very rocky. At low tide, depending on things, you may or may not see rocks, but certainly most any day if you walk out two or three feet deep, at least on Naples Beach, you find rocks and the same is probably true on Vanderbilt and I know if you dig down in both Naples and Vanderbilt, in the right areas, you will find rocks, there is no doubt, but the issue is, yes, but which would you rather have, the occasional rocks that manage to work their way up or get washed out or the equipment on the beach for however long it takes to get rid of them, and Dick Lyden's opinion is just leave the beach alone, I think. MR. STRAPPONI: My next question would be, we know for certain that a lot of those rocks were put there with the replenishment, but how many of those rocks, if any, Page 7 January 11, 20021 6 J 2 and I would suspect quite a few, are just roll -ins that just naturally occur? There is no standard to go by. Was any testing done prior to the renourishment? DR. STAIGER: No, but when the -- when they did this rock, there was an analysis done for the county. I think you tried to differentiate between native rock and rock that was brought in with the dredging, and you can look at some rocks and say, okay, this is obviously freshly broken, and assume it came in with the dredge, and stuff that's very nicely rounded and heavily eroded is stuff that's rolled in, but there is a lot of rock that is sort of in between, so it's a tough call. MR. ROELLIG: But there is a potential for a fairly large percentage of the rock being native. DR. STAIGER: Yeah. Well, the native rock is shed frequently from the hard bottom -- it's not that far off shore -- and it rolls up on the beach and the only difference there is it's usually worked enough so that the edges are rounded, but the rocky area that's troublesome in the city is from about Fifth Avenue South to the pier, and that's where the stuff shows up in this runnel. It's at the low tide line and it and would be a real shame if we couldn't do something north of Fifth Avenue South all the way up to Doctors Pass. MR. KROESCHELL: Especially Lowdermilk. DR. STAIGER: Like Lowdermilk Park and that whole area. That's the issue. Because when we did the rock removal, it was done annually from'96 on, they concentrated in that area where the rock had obviously been pumped and nobody at the state said, you know, you can't do anything else on the beach, although I don't think we were putting sand anywhere else, but it's unfortunate because if they say, okay, you can't do anything until we approve this rock removal plan and then they want to look at it in various segments, we're not going to get sand on the beach for two years, so we need to argue with them about it. MR. ROELLIG: In my opinion, we need to take a pretty hard stand, too. DR. STAIGER: I agree. MR. ANDERSON: Jim Mudd has indicated from his experience that they're kind of beyond their authority and we have -- it's really beyond anything that's written anywhere and they are just being ultra conservative and it's just totally inappropriate. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I know staff is working hard and hopefully when we meet next month, if not sooner -- I know we are going to discuss meeting schedules later -- we'll have better news at hand. Is there anything else on the rock removal? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: On to Item 4(c), which is the Tropical Storm update. MR. HOVELL: Earlier this week the state's public assistance coordinator was down. He is the one that signs off on the final project worksheets that get submitted to I January 11, 2046J J 2 FEMA for funding approval. Through that process -- we were working on all four segments, Marco Island, Naples, Park Shore and Vanderbilt -- and he doesn't take away a big book, he takes away something relatively small, but he pulls like the cover page from the permit and attaches it and says we have the rest and the cover page from the surveys and attaches that and that kind of thing. Anyway, in assembling all of that and looking through it and doing the final reviews, questions arose about Marco Island's documentation and we did some research into the annual monitoring reports and ultimately he rejected any damage claim for Marco Island, so at this point the Naples, Vanderbilt and Park Shore have gone forward and it will be forwarded to FEMA fairly shortly, but we will not get any reimbursement for any damage on Marco Island. One of the things they looked at, I guess two main issues were although we did a post -storm survey in the October - November time frame, trying to document the difference between pre- and post - storm, when we went back and looked, the last time that a survey had been done on Marco Island was October of -- I guess that was 1999, so basically two years old. That was one issue, and the second issue was in the annual monitoring reports that were published in '97, '98 and '99, which were the three most recent ones, all three years showed not erosion but accretion on basically all of Marco Island in that area where we are proposing to say we had sand loss, so between those two things, they turned down any claim for that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And also with this latest tropical storm we already knew going in Marco was the least hard hit anyway, wasn't it? MR. HOVELL: It was, yes. It's unfortunate that we missed that opportunity and hopefully if we are on track doing at least our annual monitoring plus any odd events like construction projects or other storms or whatnot, we'll have at least once a year surveys, but we were out of date. MR. PIRES: What kind of surveys are you talking about? MR. HOVELL: The land survey, the guy with the rod. DR. STAIGER: Elevation. MR. HOVELL: Elevation. DR. STAIGER: Elevation profiles. It's something you kind of forget about and you get a project finished and you survey for a couple years afterwards for monitoring and then it kind of slips through the cracks, but if FEMA is going to require data that are less than a year old, it just behooves you to schedule monitoring on all these segments once a year just so you have got the data. You never know when it might come in handy. MR. PIRES: Whose obligation is it to do that, would that be the county or the city's to do that? MR. HOVELL: It was a county permit and still is an open county permit that allows for renourishment for Marco Island. It wasn't that we decided not to do it in 2000. January 11, 20 6J 2 I think it was probably like a lot of things around here, because we were terminating Coastal Engineering Consultants, it just became one of those things that just didn't get done. I think, even though a post -storm survey was done in the October - November time frame, I think we are in line under a contract to have a monitoring report published. It's just that we didn't have the surveys done at the right time. MR. SNEDIKER: The only area of Marco Island involved is the very southern tip of it, right near where the breakwaters were. If we go back to our September field meeting when we looked down, it's at the very end. It's the first 1,000 or 1,500 feet at the very end, which if there is a dredging project going on next year at Caxambas Pass -- I can never say that -- that place, then the sand will be brought up and that will be the most logical spot for it, so that area will be renourished hopefully next year when the pass is dredged. MR. HOVELL: And then we did start hauling on to Park Shore Beach as of last Friday. They worked Friday and Saturday and then all this week. We are bringing in the sand from the E.R. Yanna (phonetic) from the Ortona Sand Mine, much like we did back in April. We have had a lot of E -mail traffic about that being inappropriate sand. I don't think that's really going anywhere, but I did bring with me the sand lab reports and they are -- you know, the issue is that three or so years ago when Coastal Engineering Consultants was the coastal engineer for the county, they had developed a distribution reference size with the minimum and maximum and when you plot the E.R. Yanna sand, there is a section that goes outside of that boundary. The state never accepted that as the correct specification. They have continued to say that they are very happy with sand from the E.R. Yanna Sand Pit, but anyway, it's an issue that is kicking around. MR. SNEDIKER: That sand was very, very thoroughly looked at by the committee for a long time. There were truck loads of sand out there. People took off their shoes and ran through them, and the sand we just walked on at Hideaway Beach, the sand that we walked out there was the same sand. It was delivered the same time last spring. MR. HOVELL: Just so you know, the claim is that the sand that you are talking about that was delivered on to Park Shore Beach and the committees were out there and feeling it and everything, that that was processed differently and it was a better mixture of grain sizes. That's the claim and there may even be some truth in it, but we have used this sand before. The turtle people seem to be happy with it, the state seems to be happy with it. MR. SNEDIKER: Anyone looked up the new sand versus the old sand? Is there a difference? MR. HOVELL: The grain size seems to be somewhat different. MR. STRAPPONI: Is that the complaint, the grain size? MR. HOVELL: It all comes down to the grain size. MR. STRAPPONI: How about the color? Page 10 January 11, 200216 2 MR. HOVELL: Well, actually, maybe color, too, but mainly grain size. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: When you reference the E -mail traffic, do you mean from the public or - -- MR. HOVELL: Yes. DR. STAIGER: From a public, an individual public. MR. HOVELL: The other public issue with Horizon Way is Horizon House. There is one rather outspoken resident who -- or I guess temporary resident because he lives up north someplace and he had called me a number of times by phone complaining and now that he's here he had somewhat of an altercation with Al Mattson last evening and I believe they called the city manager's office. Anyway, not a big issue, but somebody is not happy. MR. ANDERSON: He is just concerned that the work is going on next door to him and the equipment is noisy and it's disturbing his solitude but, you know, it's our property, it's permitted. You know, if he gives us a hard time, then we'll take appropriate action. He has threatened an injunction, but we are moving forward. We'll be done in a few days, you know, so we are done next week. MR. HOVELL: We are hoping, if everything goes well, we'll be done a week from tomorrow, I would think. We might go a little bit into the following week. MR. SNEDIKER: How many yards is that? MR. HOVELL: I'm sorry? MR. SNEDIKER: How many yards, is that 20,000? MR. HOVELL: Oh, no, we are looking in the neighborhood of eight to 10,000 yards. We're just doing the dunes and the seawalls. MR. PIRES: I take it the operation is just during daylight hours? MR. HOVELL: Yes. Because of the noise ordinance, they're not allowed to start before 7:00 a.m. And it gets dark about 6:00, but the noise ordinance says by 6:30. Usually, somewhere between 5:00 and 6:00 they shut down. MR. PIRES: Is that the county crew? MR. HOVELL: No, it's a company called Phillips & Jordan. MR. ROELLIG: I've got a question, just to make sure I understand. We are using the same sand gradation now that we used the last time; is that correct? MR. HOVELL: Yes. MR. ROELLIG: And as far as the placement, I know at the last meeting we were talking about maybe the city being involved, how did that end up? MR. HOVELL: We contracted with a company called Phillips & Jordan, and that was going to be the next part, but on the contracting side, we had gone out with a request for proposals for the sand contract and for the trucking placing and grading contract. Both of those selection committees have -- either the first or second selection committee meeting is next week to try to move those things along, but since we have seen the pricing in the trucking R.F.P., we were able to go back and look at the proposal we got Page 11 January 11, 2002 6 J 2 from the storm debris removal contract and realized -- and actually they proposed under this contract and realized they're very competitive with all the proposals we have gotten, so we were able to justify moving forward and calling that a reasonable price. MR. ROELLIG: So what price do we end up with, then? MR. HOVELL: I think -- boy, it didn't hit $20 a yard, but we are doing it in tons. I can't remember -- it's hard to remember all the figures, but - -- MR. ROELLIG: It's not dramatically different than last time, then. I think the last time we were 18- something. MR. SNEDIKER: It's in order with what we had last spring. MR. ROELLIG: Fine. MR. SNEDIKER: Maybe a few cents more. MR. ANDERSON: It's somewhat more than last year. MR. HOVELL: It's about 30 to 40 percent more than we spent last time. MR. ROELLIG: It's 40 percent? MR. HOVELL: Yes. It's -- MR. ROELLIG: It was $18 last year, I thought. MR. HOVELL: Again, it gets into, you know, when you say more, are you including just the sand price or just the trucking and hauling price or adding it all together? MR. ROELLIG: All total, right. MR. HOVELL: The total price, the sand went up 15 or 20 percent and then the trucking and placing and grading is the one that went up more like 40 percent, which is why we were reluctant to do it without having some price justification, but now that we have seen that all six proposals are all right in line with this one, then we felt comfortable doing it. MR. ROELLIG: Because 40 percent sounds like a lot until you apply it. MR. KROESCHELL: How much sand did we put in before? MR. ROELLIG: About 35. MR. KROESCHELL: That's a factor, too. MR. ROELLIG: Yeah, so that sounds right. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: What about the other 30,000 or 40,000 tons we supposedly have available? MR. HOVELL: Yes, Park Shore was due for about 30 -- whatever the survey said -- 36,000 cubic yards, I think, and that will be the issue. Over the next couple of weeks, you know, we need to decide what do we want to do for the rest of this construction season before May 1 st when the turtle season starts. Do we want to finish Park Shore and/or do we want to try and start on the north end of Naples? Do we want to try and do anything at all on Marco. I know the city had indicated that as long as we were doing the southern end and we go to the construction entrance, that it would be okay to work during tourist season, so Page 12 January 11, 20021 6 J 2 that's kind of the thing that needs to be refined, what else do we want to try and do this year. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We had also discussed in some depth last time trying to get a start on replacing the dune system where it's needed the most, and I left the meeting with the impression that we were going to focus on using the remaining 40,000 yards or whatever the measurement was and focus on that activity. MR. HOVELL: Unfortunately, we won't be able to do anything on Vanderbilt because pretty much all of Vanderbilt does have the rock removal issue. We are doing the dune part and the seawall part of Park Shore now and we probably will be able to do something like that at Naples. It will take a while to get through the state, so maybe that's something we can definitely plan on doing in maybe late March or early April, depending upon how everybody feels about that. There really weren't any dunes damaged at Marco. I think the only area that is under consideration is all the way down at the south. I don't know the name of that construction site, but there is kind of a seawall all the way around it and the one part of the seawall is parallel to those three offshore breakwaters, and then there is another section that runs at about a 45 degree angle that as you are coming down the beach you can typically see if it is exposed, which at least right now part of it is. DR. STAIGER: Is that Cape Marco? MR. HOVELL: Is that the name of it? DR. STAIGER: Yes. MR. HOVELL: Okay. As Jim had mentioned before -- do you have some photos of that? MR. SNEDIKER: Yes. MR. HOVELL: The Caxambas Pass is on I guess the ten year plan, or maybe in this year's budget to have the work started to do a dredging project there, and if we are going to dredge Caxambas Pass in, let's say, November, December, that's where the sand goes. So from an aesthetics point of view, it doesn't look that great seeing the exposed seawall or some of the rocks, but from a real, you know, engineering need, I don't think there is an engineering need to try and do anything. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: But I'm thinking more, and I think this is what I gathered from our last couple meetings, I'm thinking more in terms of what if we use the sand available to rebuild dunes and then the dunes have to be planted with appropriate vegetation, we are just going to be a lot farther ahead in the long term and that's where I would like to see us focusing. That's different than a major renourishment, but that's something more than maintenance also and it just seems we will get more bang for our buck over time and that will be cumulative. We'll both have better retention and need less sand over time, if I understand the dynamics of it properly. MR. HOVELL: I think you're right in trying to get geared up to do that for Naples, Page 13 January 11, 20016 J 2 which as I said the only other area I can anticipate that we might get something done on the dunes, because there aren't any dunes to do anything with down on Marco that were destroyed by the storm. MR. SNEDIKER: Correct. MR. PIRES: Does this send a better message to DEP that you are proactive in regard to placing the sand, not just pushing it around and -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: There is no such thing as a good message for the DEP. MR. PIRES: -- plant around, trying to maintain their integrity? I know, just trying. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: What we are trying to do is maintain our beaches. MR. PIRES: Sometimes we try to send one. DR. STAIGER: It makes a great deal of sense to do that, though, because there isn't enough time and there isn't enough sand available to restore the Naples or Park Shore beaches to pre - Gabrielle state and there is a certain amount of recovery going on, but the damage to the dune system is significant. We put that reservoir of sand back there, get vegetation on it and irrigate it so that it grows, then you will have that buffer again. If we get a storm hit this summer or next fall, we've got that much sand back in the system to resist erosion. If we don't do anything until November, then we're stuck with all these scarped dunes with no vegetation left on them, so I think that's probably the best thing to do with what resources are there. The main thing is going to be to get DEP to allow us to go forward with it. MR. SNEDIKER: As I recall, we only need about 30,000 yards to restore the dunes to a reasonable level, and that would include everything other than you can't do something because of the DEP restrictions, but if we can do half of that or whatever we can do, I would say we should definitely go forward and do whatever we can. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I would think so. MR. SNEDIKER: On a very prompt basis. MR. HOVELL: As I say, the issue right now is, even though today I have a notice to proceed that says we can work on the -- you know, it was given with a gentleman's agreement that we wouldn't do Naples Beach until we get further along with the rock removal issue. I'm hoping through the process in detailed discussions with the state that they'll realize Naples Beach is a big area, the rock removal issue as compared to the whole length of the beaches is relatively small and, therefore, that we can do something, starting with dunes and seawalls and starting up by Doctors Pass. MR. SNEDIKER: How about Vanderbilt? Can we work anything up there? MR. HOVELL: No, that whole beach is all, basically, the whole beach needs to be tested and potentially dug up, depending Page 14 January 11, 20016 2 on what we work out. MR. ROELLIG: You had better be careful about that. You're going to get a hornet's nest if you just show up there one day. MR. SNEDIKER: If the state requires it. MR. ROELLIG: Well, you know, the state, whatever they are doing now, there is always a higher authority. I never -- I can't buy this that you have got to satisfy the lowest rung and then if they say no that's the end of it. MR. SNEDIKER: You try to fight it or - -- MR. ANDERSON: Exactly. MR. ROELLIG: Just because you find a block at one level, doesn't mean you can't go around it. MR. PIRES: In respect of doing the planting and vegetation and irrigation, what is needed from your perspective to go forward to do that? Do you need any further direction? Do you think you have the direction and/or the budget to do that? Or is there a message we can send to the County Commission? MR. HOVELL: I guess I've sort of been assuming when we say let's do something about dunes, that that first means putting some sand there and then planting, but of course to put the sand there on Naples, anyway, I have to get past this rock removal issue. MR. ROELLIG: Is the rock removal all the way up to the dunes? MR. HOVELL: Yes. MR. ROELLIG: So there are rocks underneath where the dunes were? MR. HOVELL: Yes. Even, as the story goes, the vegetation line pre- Tropical Storm Gabrielle, there were rocks under there but we all were kind of in agreement, well, let's not mess with protected sea grapes and sea grass and whatnot, but when that vegetation got wiped out, then it raised the issue of, well, here is the perfect opportunity to dig up those rocks a then refix the dunes and replant them. MR. STRAPPONI: I ask the question, don't the rocks help hold that dune together? The rocks are not going to be a problem for barefoot people on the dunes. Dr. Staiger, we talked about revegetating those dunes, I would think that -- I don't know what the plans are, but I would think there are some things that would hold the dunes together better than others, as far as sea oats or - -- DR. STAIGER: Sea oats is probably the best one, but you try to plant a little variety. The sea oats root system seems to be the most effective in holding sand. The rock issue under the dune is -- it's not that much rock and it's essentially going to be covered with dune and vegetation. MR. SNEDIKER: Is the state suggesting or requiring that that rock be removed also? MR. HOVELL: In their version. DR. STAIGER: City counsel has asked for it. MR. ANDERSON: Everywhere except for Park Shore. Page 15 January 11, 20016J 2 MR. ROELLIG: So city counsel had asked for what? Rock removal -- MR. ANDERSON: Rock removal. MR. ROELLIG: -- under the dunes? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That's not my impression. DR. STAIGER: I thought we had direction to that effect. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think the direction was the opposite. DR. STAIGER: Oh, okay. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I'm not certain, I could be wrong here. I can speak for myself right now. I think in a lot of the cases that this rock removal has gotten way too theoretical. If you are cutting your feet and stubbing your toes, we have an issue, but rocks under a dune, I couldn't care less. MR. SNEDIKER: Right. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So, Dr. Staiger, maybe I'm not correct, but I think we had at least four if not more, maybe five -- DR. STAIGER: There were a few who felt - -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Probably five realists and two people who just, you know, want to spend their life talking about rocks. DR. STAIGER: Contrarians, Amen. I personally don't see much expense in a lot of that digging. I'm of the camp that says let's take it off the surface when it shows up. MR. ROELLIG: Exactly. MR. SNEDIKER: I agree. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: For what it's worth, I think you have got a good consensus from this committee to go hard against this state to try and trim back the rock removal to the extent we can. I mean, we have acknowledged that there are areas where rock removal is important, but there are other areas where it's just guilding the lily and work to get our dune system restored. Anything else from anyone on the Tropical Storm update? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Item 4(d) is our TDC Category A project status report. MR. HOVELL: Were there any questions? I know last time we kind of went back and forth a little bit, but I think we agreed that I would hand these out at the meeting and if you had any questions either at the meeting or in between or at the next meeting, you would get with me, so I guess were there any questions on the December version of the report? MR. ROELLIG: Can you give us a current status report on ongoing projects such as Parker Sand Web or Doctors Pass? Maybe one sentence or something? MR. HOVELL: I could. Let me just real quick say that the differences between this report and the December report are relatively minor because of the holidays, not January 11, 200216 J much really happened and -- but I would tell you that probably between this report and the next report I would anticipate that as we -- I guess somewhere in early December we got in the final results from all the sand surveys, the post -storm surveys. We know more exact quantities until the wind starts picking up, anyway, as compared to the 400,000 cubic yard estimate that we had for storm recovery, and although we don't know the exact price for the rock removal, it would seem that the eight- and -a -half million dollars for that one restoration project may be a fair amount high, so we may try and bring that down some and put some money back in reserves. One of the first things, we'll want to put the $500,000 back on the Marco Island breakwater modification project where it came from. Then there is a number of purchase orders from last year that are starting to close out and there will be little dribs and drabs of money that will start to trickle back in and those, too, can go to the reserves. Then the other difference will be that right now there is a lot of money that's shown as budgeted, it's shown as anticipated to be encumbered but it's not shown as being encumbered. We'll start to fill that up some as we're issuing purchase orders to the Coastal engineers. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We'll get to it in a couple items. We did have to change a larger cost than we anticipated for Clam Pass, so we can address that in its own item, but there are no other significant changes we should be aware of? MR. HOVELL: No, and the other thing that we'll see, actually, I don't know, we probably won't have resolved it before the early February report, but in a not too distant future, we'll get our first check from the state under the $1.3 million contract we have for cost - sharing these projects. Probably early next week I will send out the final report and invoice for that, for the first payment under that contract, and it turns out they might waive it since some of this work is done, but typically they hold ten percent retainage, so it looks like we'll get somewhere in the neighborhood of $170,000 to $185,000 for this first check, so things are starting to move in that regard. MR. ANDERSON: And that's based upon the work that was done last year in Park Shore? MR. HOVELL: Predominately the Park Shore work from April, right. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any questions or comments on that item? MR. STRAPPONI: I would like to make a request, for my benefit, I'm not speaking for the whole committee, but maybe you could use a little larger font size -- can't be done -- on these reports? MR. ANDERSON: Last time we had a large font size we got criticized for that. MR. HOVELL: The problem is if I make the font size larger, it won't just make it longer down the page, it will make it wider, and then it won't fit on one width of one page, and then you would have to hold two pages next to each other to figure out what it is that you are looking at, and that is usually very awkward. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Right. Page 17 January 11, 2002 MR. PIRES: Or use legal size. MR. HOVELL: Legal size, right. MR. STRAPPONI: I think we have had others on legal size, little larger font. MR. SNEDIKER: Would it be possible to shade the areas that are changed each month? Otherwise, to see this, you'd have to go back to last month and compare line by line or item by item. MR. ANDERSON: Maybe we could use a Hi- Liter, darker font or - -- MR. SNEDIKER: Or go to a bold font. MR. HOVELL: I could look at doing something like that part. MR. SNEDIKER: Just so we can pick up where the charges are. MR. HOVELL: I will take a look at how it might work on legal size paper. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay, thank you. Item 4(e) is Tigertail Beach/Sand Dollar Island. MR. HOVELL: I have kind of left this on here because it's something the committee has expressed a lot of interest in. We discussed it to some extent when we were out there for the visit, as far as the background and where some of those various ideas -- the three main ones being to put some kind of boardwalk over that lagoon being probably the most likely, filling in the lagoon being the least likely and maybe opening up what used to be a pass on the south as an intermediate possibility, and I don't know that there is really any other update that I really had. Like I say, it's been an open issue and I know the committee is very interested in it, but I think as far as how to deal with it in the future, I guess I would suggest that since we are going to the ten year plan and the budgeting process and all that, that we just agree that it will be in there someplace and not continue to have it as a separate agenda item. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, I think it should be in there because indeed it's new business as part of that planning process rather than an update item. MR. SNEDIKER: Has there been communication between Phil Flood from the state DEP and Marlo Ramsey, do we know, or her department, Parks and Recreation? MR. ANDERSON: Not that I am aware of, no. MR. SNEDIKER: It's sort of like their ball game, isn't it? It's a Parks and Recreation project. MR. HOVELL: I think so. MR. SNEDIKER: We can endorse it, but we have nothing to do with it, as I look at it. MR. STRAPPONI: Ron, I know you attend the City of Marco's beach committee and - -- MR. HOVELL: Actually, I don't typically. MR. STRAPPONI: I would be interested in seeing what their input is and their feelings with regards to Tigertail. MR. HOVELL: Mr. Snediker is the chairman of the Marco Island Beach Advisory January 11, 2002 1 2 Committee. He is very able to tell you anything like that. MR. STRAPPONI: Could we request that you supply this committee with - -- MR. SNEDIKER: It's a county park so it's really not within the city's jurisdiction at all. The city, because a lot of people from the city use it because of the geographical location, they would like to see a more usable park. When we were out there today, a lot of people were using it but very few people were in the water. Virtually nobody was in the water swimming. As I recall, a couple people were walking out there, but I think, basically, the City of Marco Island would probably like to see the bridge going across. Again, it's a county park so it's not a city decision as such. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I agree with Mr. Strapponi that even though it's technically a county beach, which you are pointing out, it would have to be a county decision, it will impact the residents and the tourists of Marco the most, so having their input I think would be helpful to us. MR. SNEDIKER: Okay. Let me get a motion and resolution passed by them. MR. STRAPPONI: We certainly value your input on that. I am sure as a member of this committee you would want that input. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: In addition, if there are other issues on the island as regarding the beaches that we might take under advisement. MR. SNEDIKER: I always give them an update as to ours, so I'll give our committee an update on theirs, although theirs is very restricted to just doing Marco Island. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Very good. Item 4(f). MR. ANDERSON: Clam Pass dredging update, we have let that contract and the contractor is anticipated to start this next week on Tuesday, and the job will go -- take approximately three weeks. Just for your recollection, this is going to involve dredging of the pass itself and then depositing the sand on Clam Pass Beach, and that's the existing permitted area, so that project will be starting up and be done very quickly. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Since we are not going to be doing the major beach project that we initially anticipated after the tropical storm, do we now, then, have the funds available in reserves to pay for that incremental cost or where will that money come from? Because we have gone from 400 - something to 500- something, have we not? MR. HOVELL: I think you are talking about Wiggins Pass. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Oh, pardon me. MR. ANDERSON: This is Clam Pass. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Wiggins Pass is the next item. MR. ANDERSON: That's fully funded. MR. ROELLIG: Clam Pass is fully funded. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That's fully funded, right. MR. ANDERSON: That will be the next one. MR. PIRES: As part of that, I know it's not the beach per se, but the beach Page 19 January 11, 20126J Z facilities that are there at the park, that boardwalk ramp that got shifted off to the side and sort of cockeyed right now, is that part of Parks and Recreation, is that part of Registry or is that - -- MR. ANDERSON: That would be Parks and Recreation maintenance. MR. SNEDIKER: They own it. MR. PIRES: Last time I was out there, it was not repaired, and that was a couple weeks ago. MR. ANDERSON: We can notify Marla and - -- MR. SNEDIKER: That's bad. That's a very popular boardwalk. MR. PIRES: I was surprised, it's still - -- MR. ANDERSON: Still kind of off to an angle? MR. PIRES: Right. MR. ANDERSON: This is the prime season now. MR. HOVELL: My impression having been out there a couple times since the storm is they don't plan on doing anything with it. It's passable, it is at an angle, but it's passable everywhere. The safety rails are up and it's not structurally unsound. MR. SNEDIKER: It's not closed off? MR. HOVELL: No, it's not closed off and it's being used, so - -- MR. ROELLIG: But there are other ways to get on the beach. MR. HOVELL: And there are other avenues to get out there, that's true, so I sort of assume that they just don't plan on doing anything in the near future. MR. PIRES: Is it something to find out? I mean, we spend all this money to help the beach become a better facility for enjoyment and then an aspect of access has gone by the boards. MR. ANDERSON: It may not meet the building code. (Laughter) MR. PIRES: It's kind of like the leaning Tower of Pizza. MR. ANDERSON: We'll check that out. Thank you. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Anything else on the Clam Pass dredging? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Item 4(g), Wiggins Pass. MR. HOVELL: We had included in the agenda package a copy of the executive summary that went to the Board of County Commissioners this past Tuesday to both award the contract and to do a budget amendment to fund an increased amount. The dredge contracts, and this one in particular, are done as a unit price contract with perhaps mobilization or something as an additional item. The original dollar value estimate for the construction projects was $400,000, and I believe from looking through the inlet management plan that that was based upon about a 42,000 cubic yard sand dredging event. The survey shows that we'll be dredging closer to 55,000 cubic yards, and therefore the bids we got in were over $500,000. Page 20 January 11, 20'16J 2 On a unit price basis, we're not really looking at paying anymore -- actually, I think even a little less than what was originally anticipated, but it's just the quantities have gone up almost 25 percent; therefore, the dollar value has gone up, so the normal process, I guess, if we had lots of time would have been to receive bids, wait for the next Coastal Advisory Committee meeting, get your input, wait for the next Tourist Development Counsel meeting, get their input and then go to the Board of County Commissioners, but given all the various constraints we had, we went to the earliest opportunity, directly to the board, and told them that we would come to the Coastal Advisory Committee today and the Tourist Development Counsel on Monday to advise them of what we are doing and if there are any negative comments, then we would get back to the Board of County Commissioners, but as it stands they have voted and approved it and it will go forward. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And also Mr. Avella (phonetic) had contacted me in the interim to give us advice and my reaction was the fundamental decision was to recommend the Wiggins Pass dredging in the work schedule and the fact that our budget number wasn't exactly right didn't negate the need for the project; that the money would be found, and that leads into the question that I asked under the prior item, I was really asking about Wiggins Pass. Since I assume we have the money back in reserves, is that where the money is going to come from? MR. HOVELL: Well, actually, we haven't moved any money into reserves, so when we did the budget amendment we said money was available in 10507, which is the one that has eight- and -a -half million dollars, so we'll show the money coming out of that project and being moved out. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Because even when we get the green light for the big renourishment that was originally considered to be recovery from Tropical Storm Gabrielle, even when and if that occurs we are going to need far less sand than we thought, so there has to be money, effectively. However you're accounting for it, effectively we must have money available in reserves for this. MR. HOVELL: Yes, that's our thought process. MR. SNEDIKER: Do you need a motion from us? MR. HOVELL: I think it would probably be best for the record to say that the committee specifically was advised and voted on it and that way if there are any negative votes we can report back to the Board of County Commissioners that there was, you know, either all agreement or negative votes, whatever. MR. ROELLIG: I will make a motion to transfer sufficient funds, I am not sure -- what is the number? MR. HOVELL: The budget amendment we asked for is $165,000. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So we have a motion by Mr. Roellig, which in effect ratifies the decision made. Do we have a second? MR. SNEDIKER: Second. Page 21 January 11, 20021 (--,t J CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Questions or comments? MR. ROELLIG: My only comment would be that this is more of a procurement problem than a cost problem. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Exactly. That was my reaction. Our job is really priorities and do what we have to do to put some kind of dollar value on it, but it's really the TDC and the commission that deal with the dollars more than we do. We have a motion and a second. All in favor say Aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Pass, 7 -0. Mr. Hovell, Mr. Anderson, Item 4(h) and 4(i), ten year plan development and TDC grant application cycle, together with our new business item, future meetings schedule, they are all really part and parcel of the same statement and that is really the guts of what our committee is here for, so how do you want to handle those? MR. HOVELL: I agree, if you don't mind. Just talking about them sort of interchangeably all at one time, that's probably best. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. MR. ANDERSON: In terms of the actual budget cycle, the TDC, let's see, budget is finalized and we have to submit the budget to the TDC in April, the beginning of April, so that would mean that we would have to have our recommendations, you know, finalized probably at our meeting in March, regular meeting in March, let's say, with our normal schedule, which would mean if we wanted to have any workshops or meetings to discuss our priorities, we're probably looking at having them in February and we could either do that by doing it in our same meeting date in February or if we wanted to have a special -- a special meeting, special session or workshop session, different day, we could also do that or we could even have the workshop in January, if you want to do that and then have something to discuss in our meeting in February. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I broached this topic at the last meeting because it's the first time through this process for me, but it seems that this is the primary reason this committee exists and that we do have a lot of work to do. Mr. Roellig has been through it before, in fact, and Mr. Gray, who is on that committee as well, if I recall. MR. ROELLIG: That's correct. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Snediker, were you on it as well? MR. SNEDIKER: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Then you can lend some guidance to us. I don't think meeting one more time is going to do it. I mean, I don't even think it's going to be close to doing it. MR. ROELLIG: I think the problem you run into is it puts the onus on the county Page 22 January 11, 2002 1 2 to come up with all of the various items to be considered, so there is no -- you can't schedule a January meeting if you are not ready for it, so it depends. It's kind of a cart and horse thing. You have to be ready for us and then we can analyze it. So I don't know what your schedule would be for getting these various activities put together. MR. ANDERSON: Well, we certainly have the last year's plan as the starting point and we could collect project ideas, if any, that we have received through the year and add those to those and then put something together. That could be done probably in the next - -- MR. SNEDIKER: Well, there is a lot of current projects. There were about a dozen new projects this year, as I recall, plus a couple for the City of Naples, and virtually none of those are going to be completed, am I correct? A lot of them aren't even going to get started. You are just putting engineers on board now and so an awful lot may carry over. I think what we need or what would be beneficial to us, put it this way, would be a thorough update of all of those. That's going to take a good healthy session or a couple three sessions to do that, so we are all fully on board of those for what those are that came up last spring, plus our new projects. I can visualize several hours, you know, worth of good, strong discussion on this. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I would think so. Mr. Strapponi, you were going to say something? MR. STRAPPONI: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Collier County is certainly concerned with our beaches, our coastal area and the impact it has on tourism. I think the fact that we take $8 million of the TDC money to do renourishment certainly reflects our concerns for what our beaches look like. I spent about two hours this morning walking primarily Naples Beach from about Second Avenue North up to maybe Ninth, I guess, I'm not sure, and one of the things that really bothers me and it's going to become a pet project with me is the storm drains. I don't know if this has been addressed before, maybe Dr. Staiger would know, whether or not there has ever been any attempt by the city or the county to do something to make the aesthetics of the beach better by either some means of giving a better cosmetic to the storm drains or otherwise hiding them totally, and I don't know whether or not from an engineering standpoint that could happen. I saw many tourists ask the question, are those sewer drains, and that's certainly the impression that someone from outside the area may have. I think if we're going to spend as much time, money and energy to keep these beaches renourished, we really need to address the aesthetics of the beach, which will include the cosmetic appearance of those storm drains, and I just would like to put that on the table as a new item, because it would certainly, if it becomes a project, would have to be worked into that ten year plan development. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Dr. Staiger, you commented on that before, I think, Page 23 January 11, 2046J J 2 to us, haven't you? We're more limited than one would hope, aren't we? DR. STAIGER: Actually, when we got the permit for the beach restoration project, one of the things that the state was talking about which fortunately didn't make it into the permit was a time frame for elimination of those drains, because DEP is really down on discharging anything across the beach. The problem is that we have got a series of storm drainage basins within the city and those basins all drain to the west. The area they drain is Gulf Shore Boulevard and the intersections of the cross streets and that's a lower area. You have got kind of an old beach ridge behind it and then the Gulf Shore and then you come up a little bit and out to the beach, and we don't have any way other than putting in lift stations and moving that storm water anywhere else, so it pretty much has to drain across the beach for that relatively limited area. Aesthetically, they are not very attractive. We have had one twin drain system where Fifth Avenue North would be, if it went through, where the adjacent upland property owner actually paid to have some pilings put in to kind of hid the things better, and we had to go do some kind of creative writing in the permit process to get that approved, but we did an area, but we have also had people ask us about putting rock around them to kind of hide them. Anything you do like that, DEP considers that to be a groin and they're very concerned about additional groin construction. It may be that the simplest thing to do would be to look at -- you can't really paint those pipes and have the paint stick to them very well, but it could be to see if we could get, over a period of time, replace that mixture of green and white pipes with something that was a little more appealing color. We have had people talk about putting decking or something out over them so that they could be -- people could walk out on them and fish from them, but you have got the liability then if the structure gets damaged in a storm or somebody twists his ankle and you get sued. They really are an eyesore and the city engineering department would actually like to drain some more across the beach rather than less, so that's -- I don't know that we'll ever get permission to do that, but it might be worthwhile investigating what we could do to kind of camouflage them. The additional pilings associated with them kind of turn them into a pile cluster groin and there is nothing really wrong with those structures. They are a means of stabilizing the beach. It might be something that one or the other of the engineering firms the county has now got on board could take a look at what we, you know, what the alternative would be if we just want to deal with different color pipes, then it's a matter of scheduling, you know, jerk the stuff out that's there and replacing it with a new piece. MR. ANDERSON: Jon, is there flow in these pipes on a pretty regular basis or is it only during storm events? DR. STAIGER: It's pretty much just when it rains. There is no active pumping to them. There is one of them at Fifth Avenue that drains three lakes that are in the interior Page 24 January 11, 20021 6 u 2 of the city and that's tidally influenced, so there is enough water flowing in and out of that to be fairly active. The only other ones that flow is when somebody is de- watering a construction site or de- watering a pool excavation or something into the storm drain system. If they are doing that, then there will be some flow out of them but they are dry except in the rainy season. MR. PIRES: Is there any possibility of any programs coming down the pike from either the state or federal government that will require the elimination of the discharge pipes? Like NPDES programs or people like that? (Ashley Lupo entered the room.) DR. STAIGER: The NPDES may or may not. We are wrestling around with that thing right now. I think we convinced the DEP when we were permitting the beach project that there were no alternatives to these pipes because they have been there for -- the city used to just drain the water basically through drainage ditches across the beach before they put the pipe in, but it's an awkward thing. I don't know, you know, I'd like to get rid of them simply because they are maintenance headaches and an eyesore and we do get calls all the time because people do think they're sewers and you have got to explain, no, it's storm water, but there may be an alternative. MR. PIRES: Is this part of what you were talking about as far as brainstorming as to what to do in the future? Jon has come up with an issue that might be a workshop for new projects. Maybe you have three types of workshops, one for existing projects budget forecast update and another one as part of that for pending approved projects not yet started and third one just new projects. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, that's what I was thinking, pretty much what you are saying that we'll probably have some new ideas. That's an idea of something to look at. Whether these things end up on the final list or not is what we'll be having our workshops and our meetings off of. We have the boardwalk issue. We in various forms at various times have emphasized the rebuilding the dunes issue, I think more than has been done in the past. Maybe I am in error on that but I think that at least feels more prominent to me in our concerns and I just want us all to have time to look at those things and to look at the prior projects, not saying anything should be on the hit list, but we are a new committee and take a look at them. If they haven't, for whatever reason, permitting or funds availability or whatever, if they haven't gone forward yet to take a fresh look and I think we should -- when again do we have to have our work product done for the TDC? MR. HOVELL: It's supposed to meet the first week in April, although you can see in January they postponed until the middle, and much like anybody else they want it about two weeks ahead of time so they can send it out to their committee, so - -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: What I would suggest is in our normal course we would have two meetings and I don't frankly care if we call them meetings or workshops, Page 25 January 11, 2002 1 �J I don't think it makes any difference, but I would propose that we add an additional meeting in February and one additional meeting in March. I think Mr. Roellig pointed out that the staff needs time to pull some of this together, perhaps in the next three weeks until our regularly scheduled February meeting. Mr. Kroeschell? MR. KROESCHELL: That is what I was going to suggest, that we've got a meeting coming up in about three weeks and that would be a good time to -- and we're going to have more time available, we're not going to the beach or anything, and we can have more time to discuss. I don't know how much time -- I would have to refer to some of the senior members here as to how much time we need to do this, but at least we could get started and at that meeting determine whether we need extra meetings, and then that would be a good time to get going on this whole plan. MR. SNEDIKER: Just play it by ear. I would want to tentatively schedule the meetings so that everyone knows the time is available, but we just progress and if we get it all done, then we don't need to have the last meeting. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Exactly, and that would give us the opportunity for four meetings, four timely meetings before the TDC needs their material and the way groups work we'll probably need four meetings, and if it should only take three, that will be great, but at least we are scheduled and planning ahead. What I would also like to do - DR. STAIGER: Two in February, two in March. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Yes. What I would also like to do, if the group agrees, is that our tendency under old business has been to have a report every month on active projects, and I think in the normal course that's a good thing but while we are working on this, I would like to skip those updates unless there is something truly significant to update. Groups being what they are, even if the updates are minor in substance, there are naturally questions, we spend ten or 15 minutes on that item, and I think in the next two months it would be more productive to drop those things from the agenda, barring something truly noteworthy, and to have a very small agenda item -wise but to focus on these projects and ask staff then to be ready next time to summarize in some detail for us the projects on the schedule just ending and what they need technically and so on and so forth and what might have changed in the last year, and we have at least three items that I have just mentioned that we'll want to consider as new activities, that being the boardwalk, if anything can be done with the storm drains, and the overall emphasis on dune rebuilding and dune renourishment. MR. PIRES: Just a thought also, from the standpoint of should there be proactive sort of communications with neighboring associations and civic groups of the coastal areas as well as some of the local government to solicit their input for that point in time we get to consider new projects, there might be something some other organizations have Page 26 January 11, 200216 J 2 bandied about or discussed that would be worthwhile to be reviewed by this committee or they may feel worthwhile to be submitted to this committee to make recommendations to the TDC board. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think it would be useful. We have mentioned that the City of Marco Island has its own beach committee, Naples and Vanderbilt to my knowledge do not, but earlier I got the impression that staff might contact a few of those more active people and active groups in the Vanderbilt area to get them tied in. I think -- Dr. Staiger, agree or disagree -- I think the City of Naples will kind of take care of itself. People are aware, people are active, they have a feel for what needs to be done and, frankly, that has been on the schedule before and probably won't change. It's things more -- that are more dynamic in terms of change from year to year, perhaps like the boardwalk and things like that? So if it would work for everyone -- did you want to say something? MR. HOVELL: I was just going to -- I guess two things from my perspective as somebody who has to kind of try and put all this together, that's why I tried to hand this out last time or I did hand this out last time as far as what we have done in the past for the ten year plan, and to a large extent, because of things like inlet management plans and permits and what -not, I think we are going to find that most of this is pretty well laid out and not overly subject to lots of changes. I mean, it's these new things that I'm really looking for help on, and I think as a committee that's a choice -- what you just discussed is a choice you need to make, how much information do you want about those things that I just called sort of business as usual. For insurance, we could at one of the future meetings, maybe even at the next meeting, just say let's just start at the beginning and let's sit down and have an overview maybe presented by the engineers, as opposed to me, of what is the inlet management plan for Wiggins Pass, you know, get to it, how often do you do it, how much do you anticipate, what is the history, you know, go through all that and therefore why are we going to budget whatever it is, every year, every three years, whatever, and go through all the inlets and then go through all the beaches and all those major things that drive the major portion of this and then those other things that it maybe one time projects or pet projects, if you want to call them that or whatever, how we are going to approach getting them started. I can tell you very quickly that from an execution point of view, you know, here we are, we are going to go into this cycle and we are going to do a ten -year plan and we are also going to be developing next year's budget or maybe refining it is a better word, unless we are able to really change the fundamental way that the collective county does business, any projects that require engineering beyond sort of the outcome of the last year's monitoring report, like let's say it had already been on our list of things to next year say we are going to do something with these storm water outfalls, if we don't approve the money such that it doesn't become available any earlier than 1 October, we will start the Page 27 January 11, 2001 b J 2 engineering or any amount of engineering and then we go through a contracting process, you are pretty much guaranteed that it's going to be the year after when we actually do the work. MR. STRAPPONI: They've been there for a long time, we are looking at a 10 year plan. MR. HOVELL: I'm just trying to point out, though, that that's the nice thing about having something laid out as far as a ten year plan. If you know two years from now you want to dredge someplace, then you can pretty much say then next year let's get the engineering started so that two years from now we can do the dredging, because if you are not budgeting until the year you want it done, to start engineering on 1 October, you are not going to get it done. MR. STRAPPONI: That's the focus of what these meetings and workshops, as Tony called them, would be. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Also, it's understood that when I said a fresh look, it's not to reinvent the wheel. A lot of these projects do carry over and most of them were put on the list and funded for good reason. I'm not suggesting that the world has changed so dramatically, it's just that we have, for all intents and purposes, an entirely new committee and we just got started really after the process ended last year and the commission was kind enough to say would you like to ratify this and we did, but we didn't have time really to go through it in any detail and I think it's just incumbent upon us all to understand it. If there are areas where the facts on the ground have changed somewhat, you know, we need to know that. If less work is needed, we might have more funds available than we thought, considerations such as that and then bringing, at least on the fringes, perhaps some fresh perspectives or fresh emphasis from the members on this committee, because the prior committee, as we all know, just got wrapped up in what had happened in the past and hurling accusations and doing all that and I don't know that they were really planning for the future and I hope that we can do a better job for planning for the future and so does the commission. That's why they dropped the other committee and put this one into effect. MR. SNEDIKER: Being a member of the former committee, I whole- heartedly agree with those statements. I would like to see us start on the first item. Whenever we have our workshop, just go down, it might be two minutes, might be four minutes on each subject, but just so everybody is aware of each line item. Again, no big discussion, just short discussion, and just so that we have that knowledge. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That's important to say, too, there are enough different projects that we can't do a masters thesis on all of them. It just needs to be, you know, a sense of understanding, it's in the second year and this is a four year affair. Some items will be detailed, some will be fairly basic. We typically meet on the first Thursday of each month. Would the first and third for February and March work for everyone? January 11, 200 16 2 MR. KROESCHELL: Same time, same day? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Yes. MR. STRAPPONI: First and third Thursday? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We normally meet on the first Thursday, so in effect the third - -- MR. SNEDIKER: February, you are speaking of? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: February and March. MR. SNEDIKER: 7th and 14th. MR. ROELLIG: 7th and 21 st. First and third. MR. SNEDIKER: Sorry, 7th and 21 st. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: All right. Do we know if we will have the commission chambers available on that Thursday? MR. HOVELL: I'd have to double check, but I know and Roy and I were talking about this before about whether we should recommend changing maybe the day of the week because it seems like the Planning Commission meets on Thursday mornings, certainly the first and I think the third. I think they are on that schedule, so we run the risk, as we got bumped that one time, we run the risk that if they run late, we are out in the hall wondering what we are going to do. I tried to get ahold of the schedule before I came to this meeting today but didn't. MR. PIRES: Maybe you can plan it for the elections office for those two days. MR. HOVELL: But if we are going to do a workshop, maybe the commission chambers really aren't the right place to do it anyway, because I think we want something more like this where I can bring in all those reports and stack them on the table and maybe we can even spend sometime where it's relatively quiet and people are just pulling all those things and flipping through and then later on we can get into a discussion about each one or something. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I have no idea about how many people would actually tune in, but if we're doing the guts of our planning, if we are in the commission chambers, it can be televised and people can see it, and the City, the City of Naples has television facilities. I don't know technically if it can be routed over to the county station or not, but I think the best first step would be to see what dates are available. I think you're right, sitting up on the dais may not be the most productive for this type of activity, but the commission has workshops in that room as well and they set up tables in the middle and the cameras can shoot down on all the people. MR. ANDERSON: They do. MR. HOVELL: Okay, I haven't seen that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: They set up tables. MR. HOVELL: I just know that it's theater style seating and they are bolted to the floor, so I just didn't know how much room there was. Page 29 January 11, 2002 16 J 2 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: They do a configuration for workshops, so if we can get that room, that would be the best. Why don't we work on than, try for the first and third Thursday, and then we'll just have to see where we go from there. MR. ROELLIG: Do you anticipate having some applications available, funding applications available for the first meeting in February? MR. HOVELL: Probably not. That was going to be my other - -- MR. ROELLIG: That's why I questioned that. As I said, it's kind of cart and horse, you have to have your applications completed, basically, and then we go over them. MR. HOVELL: I'm not sure if you have really looked at an application in much detail, but most of the grant application doesn't tell you much about the project. Most of it is - -- MR. ROELLIG: Well, I know, but -- MR. PIRES: Boilerplate. MR. HOVELL: Yes. Mostly, I mean, from my perspective, I need things like titles and maybe an engineer's costs to fill out the rest of the application, so, no, I don't really anticipate having those early on in the process and I think it would be good to kind of, you know, since that's the level of detail we want to get to is to get to the management plans and the history of all these various things and then hopefully what I will try and do is by the next meeting, in the agenda package, is try and include some way of saying, okay, if we're going to have four meetings, then here are the types of things, in essence, if I set up an agenda for each meeting, because that's going to be one of the hard parts. The closer meetings get together, the harder it becomes to wait until after the meeting to say, you know, let's put together the agenda and get all the things together and mail out a package and all that kind of stuff. If we can set that relatively early on, then we just know regardless of what happens at this meeting, the next meeting the agenda is, you know, the next thing, then it's okay to start pushing them closer together. MR. STRAPPONI: Ron, I think Gary's suggestion is right on target, the agenda really isn't going to change too much. Basically, we're going to have the roll call, approval of the minutes of the previous one, and then if you look at 4(b) down through 4(g), you could probably take those and just have one five minute, you know, put them all under one item and have just a -- you know, limit it to a five minute update and then we can go right into our business, so the agenda is only going to be this big instead of this big. MR. HOVELL: Well, it's usually the things that I try and send you with it, like meeting minutes, for instance. We'll probably fall behind on not approving the previous meeting minutes at the next meeting. We might be into April and say, here is all those meeting minutes. Page 30 January 11, 200 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG. But that's not a big deal. MR. HOVELL: Right. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That happens all the time, so that is understandable. We can appreciate that. MR. ANDERSON: So in terms of getting ready for the next meeting we can contact these other organizations and we won't bother contacting Marco because you're representing -- or Naples, so we'll do that, then, and get - -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, I think it boils down into making sure that the Vanderbilt people are aware of what is going on and can give their input and, if they care, then they probably need to be there as members of the public. Okay. Anything else, then, from anyone on our future planning? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think that will work well and I hope we can do something that's useful to the other committees and the commission. We have set aside as the next item audience participation, which is a chance for the public to address us if there is anything they wish to do and we do have members of the public, quasi - public. Does anyone want to address us? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Our next meeting, as we have just discussed, will be the first Thursday in February, which you indicated, Mr. Snediker, I believe, is the 7th? MR. SNEDIKER: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: February 7th at 1:30, commission chambers, subject to any change that Mr. Hovell will let us know about, and I think we'll try -- I was going to say -- to give form to the next four meetings, you were saying we need to anticipate what comes at the meeting after. I think next time it would be best to try to give us, to take, you know, certainly no more than three hours but take two or three hours, I would say, collectively, to give us some kind of report and update on the some of the existing projects and the ones that realistically that, you know, as staff members, they are going to be there, they were there last year, they can be there this year, so we understand them and we can start to consider the costs and that type of thing and then maybe leave a little time to preliminarily discuss our new ideas for the next meeting, the second meeting in February to get more into depth on what we might call our new ideas. MR. STRAPPONI: May I request that some of the sand that the people are complaining about, maybe bring samples to the next meeting? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Good, okay. Does anyone else have anything else he would like to say? MR. HOVELL: I just wanted to, sitting here, writing down some notes, I see maybe four main subject areas that we'll probably want to hit. I think somebody had Page 31 January 11, IAJ 2 mentioned let's get in essence current project updates, which is taking that status report and just going through it. I had already mentioned about the management plan overviews, the inlet management plans, if there is such a thing as a beach management plan or at least what we have typically done on the various beaches. Something I specifically want to show everybody at some point is how the state views funding eligibility and I borrowed the state's aerials that they have kind of marked up and kind of show you how they view what is eligible and what is not for them to participate in cost sharing and, then, finally, and probably towards the end is the actual grant applications review. After we have talked about the management plans and how things get done and whatnot, and taking into account any guidance we get, then developing the next year's individual budget grant applications and hopefully having all those available, not only the ones that I would develop but any that anyone else might be submitting for review, hopefully we can get those in on the 7th of March and if there are any questions again on the 21 st of March, so that ultimately we have all of that finalized and handed over to the TDC folks in time for their meeting. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Very good. Anyone else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: If not, this meeting is adjourned. Don't forget to give the clerk your changes to the minutes. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 4:45 p.m. COASTAL AREA ADVISORY COMMITTEE GARY GALLEBERG, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF DONOVAN COURT REPORTING, INC., BY JACLYN M. OUELLETTE Page 32 Naples Daily News Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples Daily News BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHRIS NORTON PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101 -3016 REFERENCE: 001230 #151685 5it358786 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEE State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personally appeared Angela Bryant, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Secretary of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, Florida: that the attached copy of the advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached :op, of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publictidn in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 12/03 AD SPACE: 74.000 INCH FILED ON: 12/03/01 Signature of Affiant _ Sworn to and Subscribed Personally known by me 0 me thi&3DJday pfq 200 P," Donna Chesney My Commission DD058336 Expires September 11, 2005 16J 2' December 6, 200116J TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COASTAL AREA ADVISORY COMMITTEE Naples, Florida, December 6, 2001 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Coastal Area Advisory Committee, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 1:45 p.m. In REGULAR SESSION in the Supervisor of Elections Boardroom of the Government Complex, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: VICE CHAIRMAN: Gary Galleberg David Roellig John Strapponi Robert Gray William Kroeschell Ashley Lupo James Snediker Anthony Pires OTHERS PRESENT: Ron Hovell, Roy Anderson, Jon Staiger, Ph.D., Ken Humiston, Colin Kelly, Nori Horton, Allen Madsen, Steve Keehn, Tom Campbell CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Good afternoon. We'll call to order the December 6th, 2001, meeting of the Coastal Advisory Committee. My name is Gary Galleberg. I'll note for the record that we have in attendance Vice Chairman Ro ' , r. trappon , Mr. Snediker, Mr. Kroeschell, Mr. Gray, Mr. Pires, Ms. Lup . Mr. Stakich is absent as we begin. Are there any additions to the agenda? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I had a question, and that is -- Mr. Snediker, you're going to give us a report on that Tigertail Beach meeting? MR. SNEDIKER: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Is that intended to fall under 3 -13? MR. SNEDIKER: Yes, it is. MR. ANDERSON: That will be fine. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. Then we'll move on to old business. The first item is the approval of our November 2001 minutes. Are there any changes or corrections? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Do we have a motion for approval? MR. ROELLIG: So moved. MR. GRAY: Second. Page 1 December 6, 200116J 2 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Roellig moved. It was seconded by Mr. Gray. All in favor? (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It passes unanimously. Item 3 -B, Mr. Hovell and Mr. Anderson about the stop -gap measures. MR. ANDERSON: Yes. Thank you. We're in the process now of, basically, awaiting for approvals of our rock removal and beach renourishment plans from the DEP. Specifically we're waiting for approval of the use of the Big Island sand and approval of the rock plan. So I would like to ask Ron Hovell to go into some more detail on the status and some of the issues that we're dealing with at this time. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Before Mr. Hovell starts, I just want to make sure -- can everyone hear okay? We're in this temporary facility. We have a mike here, but we thought we might just do it by voice if there isn't any problem hearing us. MR. HOVELL: Let me start with, I guess, the update part. I think I included in your agenda packet a copy of the memo that I sent to the county manager indicating that we were not able to work out a specific work order with the debris - removal contractor to begin trucking sand, so at this point we were not doing any work to restore the beaches. I think the reason we moved this up to the first thing on the agenda is there's a number of options that face us, and I think the idea is to kind of kick some of those around and talk about the pros and cons and some of the potential costs. And before I start getting into some of the specifics, I would like to point out some of the members in the audience, because I think they're all here related to this issue and could potentially all play -- depending on which way we go -- a key role in how this might work out. I think we all know Ken Humiston down on the far right -- or your far left -- from Humiston & Moore Engineers. We also have Tom Campbell and Steve Keehn here today from Coastal Planning & Engineering. We don't have a contract with either one of them, but I'm told it should be signed any day now. Then we have Colin Kelly in the back with the Parker sand web system. I know we've all tended to kick that idea around as one of the potential options. I think -- you know, as far as what the really basic options are, I think I could boil it down into four basic things, and then you can piece them together or, you know, go a hundred percent with one method or whatever. The four basic things are: Do nothing, which is sort of what we've been doing for about the past two months; do some type of upland sand placement, which typically involves trucks; do some type of offshore sand placement, which typically involves some type of dredging rig; or use some alternative much like the Parker sand web system. I think the main question boils down to what extent do we want to use any or all of those to try and recover our beaches. I guess the second part of that would be to what December 6, 200116J 2 degree do we want to recover the beaches. These are in no way meant to be, you know, specific quantities or budget figures but more just something to give you some notes to prompt discussion on how some of these things might work out. Basically, what I put down in the first block there is to strictly do a trucking evolution and do the 400,000 cubic yards. We've previously used a budget of about $8 million for that, and I think the issue that comes up is what will the timing be to try and do that. I think at this point it's pretty clear that unless we begin work here pretty soon and work through tourist season that we will not be able to complete it prior to the turtle season. The second option I put down was to do trucking of some initial quantity. I've gone down to 50,000 cubic yards but some quantity that would, in essence, be used to hit the priority areas, whether those are dunes or whether those are particular hot spots or whatever, and immediately begin the process of doing sand search - and - permitting issues with the goal being perhaps next year doing some type of dredging evolution. The third one I put down is similar. It just shows you what a higher quantity of sand being trucked in might look like using those same total quantities. The third and fourth ones are, again, a mixture of trucking and dredging but tend to have a much larger quantity, indicating that we would determine what the actual quantity needed to restore the beaches to the original design template back from the winter of '95 and '96, you know, and just get that major restoration out of the way. As you can see, the price goes up significantly. In all of those, I indicated what our current guesstimate is of FEMA and state cost - shares would be based on the applications we filed for public assistance. One thing I think I need to specifically point out is, I received a draft contract from the state. The state has signed an agreement with FEMA, and then they turn around and administer those funds. The current draft agreement indicates that the state will, in fact, pay their half of the local share. So, in essence, if all goes well, we're going to get the 75 percent from FEMA that we all thought we were going to get, 12 1/2 percent from the state, and the remaining 12 1/2 percent will be down to the county to pay. So that's, I think, good news. The last thing that I've included, although I didn't put any kind of quantities or budget figures, is, you know, to include the sand web system in that mix as a possible tool to help us do all of this. You know, all my other comments there on the right are just thoughts about which might be more expensive or which might be harder to do or some of the potential complications, the biggest one being if we were to try and contemplate doing some type of dredging event -- you know, when you bring in that kind of equipment, you basically want to do all of the beaches because of the mobilization costs. The problem we have with that is we're still under the consent order to remove the rocks from Naples and Vanderbilt Beach. So until we get an approved plan and execute Page 3 December 6, 2001 6J 2 that plan, we would be kind of on thin ice trying to plan to do a major restoration when we haven't even dug up the beach and removed the rocks yet. So I guess I would like to have it open for comments and questions at this point. MR. GRAY: Yeah, I have a question. At the last meeting, I think there was some confusion in your mind or in the county's mind as to how effective we were going to be in getting reimbursement from FEMA. I know that was discussed quite a bit because we've probably never done that before. We talked about maybe doing the 40,000, 50,000 and using that as a trial balloon to see what kind of reactions we get from FEMA. Do we know any more about FEMA today than we did a month ago insofar as the application for reimbursement and what hoops we have to jump through? MR. HOVELL: Well, I think the one thing I would tend to say we've learned is -- having received that -- I forget the exact term they used. I'm trying to remember. Actually, I think I did bring a copy of the first couple -- oh, no, that's the wrong one. MR. GRAY: The reason I bring that up is I think that is a big item insofar as us looking at the options and how much money we want to spend. MR. HOVELL: Well, I think in the past we talked about it as if we were dealing directly with FEMA. What I've come to learn having received that disaster -- I think they call it a disaster public assistance agreement, or something like that, is that the agreement is with the state. The state would then be in the middle of getting the money from FEMA and to us. As far as timeliness, you know, we do have the horror stories of it's taken up to three years to receive reimbursement. But I think we've also learned that there are other places where things have gone relatively smoothly and they've gotten a relatively quick reimbursement. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Does the state prefund, or does the state wait until it gets the federal money? MR. HOVELL: I know what they define as large products, over a million dollars, we can request, I think, about 25 percent up front to kind of kick start the project. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: In addition to the 12 1/2? MR. HOVELL: No. It would be against, I think, the FEMA share. I'm not sure whose share. But, in essence, it would be 25 percent of the approved project total that they would front to allow us to help finance the work, and then the remainder, I believe, would be paid after we've completed the work and filed the bills with them. MR. ROELLIG: Tell me what the status is of the land - source contracts, both sand and trucking. MR. HOVELL: If you mean in relation to trying to do 400,000 yards -- MR. ROELLIG: Any size. Start with fifty even. MR. HOVELL: Okay. We do have two sand contracts in place with E. R. Jahna Sand Pit out in Ortona, which is about 75 miles away, and Big Island Excavating, which is out on Immokalee Road almost out in Immokalee, so about 25 or 30 miles away. December 6, 20 T6J MR. ROELLIG: What's the cost of those if you know? MR. HOVELL: Uh -- MR. ROELLIG: Approximately. MR. HOVELL: I forget if they're in cubic yards or tons, and I'd hate to guess. It's in the neighborhood of $5 a yard, let's say, probably to be safe. One is more than the other, but it's in that general vicinity. I mean, the bigger cost is trucking. MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. HOVELL: Those current contracts that were solicited back in the summer and signed maybe in September or October have a max cap on them. You can only order up to, I think, maybe in the neighborhood of 50,000 a year. MR. ROELLIG: Okay. MR. HOVELL: We started a process to solicit for a more flexible open -ended contract that doesn't have a maximum, and the selection committee meets next week. I think by the time the contractor gets in place I would tend to guess it's going to be more or less the first of February, and that one would have no cap restriction on it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: How many different sources would we hope to have? MR. HOVELL: Well, we received four proposals. I'm not sure that we would like to do contracting with all four, but we did receive four proposals; two of which are the same two companies that already have contracts with us. MR. SNEDIKER: You're talking about the sand portion. Trucking is not -- MR. HOVELL: Well, I hope that kind of answers where we are with sand. MR. ROELLIG: We can get 50,000, more or less, anytime. MR. HOVELL: Yes. Now, the second part is where are we on the trucking. That's one of the longer sagas, but I'm going to attempt to describe it. MR. ROELLIG: Well, we read about it in the paper. MR. HOVELL: That's some of what I tried to tell you in that memo I sent out. Back when this first happened -- as you'll recall, the first thing we tried to do was waive formal competition. Then when we found out that might jeopardize our potential reimbursement, we shifted gears. Then we said, "Well, let's put it out for contract," which we have continued to pursue, but the selection committee meeting is next week on that. In the interim or for the short -term period, what we had hoped to do -- we looked at all the existing contracts in the county to see if we could use any of those as a stop -gap measure. What we found is that there is a debris - removal contract related to recovering from storms that could potentially be used. We actually went on the 13th of November to the Board of County Commissioners and received approval to do a modification for the price structuring of the contract. Then once we had that in hand, we specifically asked them for a proposal to do this initial work on Park Shore realizing that the E. R. Jahna Sand Pit out in Ortona with Page 5 December 6, 2001 16J 2 roughly 50,000 cubic yards and putting it on Park Shore is the exact work we just did in April. We knew what it cost us in April. We asked them for a proposal, and it turns out that we had just paid $585,000 back in April, and they proposed over $1 million. So our initial reaction was, you know, "This is going to be hard. We need to talk a lot about what you're assuming and what we're assuming." CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That was for 50,000 in quantity? MR. HOVELL: Right. After a lot of back and forth -- and this does not include buying the sand. This is just trucking it in place and grading it. After a lot of discussions, we got it down to the point where their proposal was just over $700,000, but it was still more than 22 percent higher than what we had just paid. So we sort of agreed to disagree, and that's when I put out that memo saying we weren't able to work anything out. MR. ROELLIG: Well, why don't you go out for a low -bid contract? You know, I mean, normally for trucking that would be the way to get a contractor. You go out and solicit bids to the low bidder. MR. HOVELL: Well, what we have in the works is a request for proposal for a multi -year contract for trucking, placing, and grading. Once we go to contract on that, it will be a long -term contract so that any time we want to recover from a storm we have that as a tool that's available to us. In the short term, though, even if I decided today, "Let's go out for low bid," when you're talking over $500,000, you've got to be out on the street for almost a month. By the time you go to the Board of County Commissioners and get the contract signed, it's going to be March. I already have something in place that will get me a contract, so I don't really need to go out for low bid. MR. ROELLIG: You may have something. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And we have a situation -- MR. ROELLIG: Excuse me. I would really prefer kind of a dual track because, you know, trucking is such a nonprofessional type of arrangement. Negotiating for trucking contracts is a little foreign to me. Something like that would normally -- MR. HOVELL: Well, see, it's not just a trucking contract. It's trucking, placing, and grading. MR. ROELLIG: Well, I understand that. MR. HOVELL: Historically we spend three to four months every time we decide we want to do this going through the same process. We know where our beaches are. There's only so many sand pits. Once we go through this one time -- and, hopefully, we're going to get more than one contractor under contract. The process would then be -- let's say we hire two or three firms and we have them under contract, then we specifically go to them and ask for quotes for the specific work we want done. In a matter of two to three weeks we have worked out the details, and we just move forward. MR. ROELLIG: I have a problem with that. I think you should go out for low bid. Page 6 December 6, 20011 6 J 2 If you select somebody and that's negotiated, I think you've got a problem as far as what would be your best price. MR. SNEDIKER: The bids are in for the sand. They're being reviewed now. The trucking bids are due in next Thursday, I think. MR. ROELLIG: But they're not bids. MR. HOVELL: They're proposals. Both the sand and the trucking is proposals, not bids. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: But the problem is -- MR. SNEDIKER: Cost. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: There will be -- as I understand this, there will be perhaps -- certainly there will be a low -bid process which will serve us in the future. We've got needs which go beyond aesthetics, at least in the case of Park Shore, and they go into -- we think -- I don't know if this has been confirmed by engineers, but we're afraid it goes into threats to substantial seawalls, which then could threaten foundations of high -rise condos, and all of that. So there will by definition be a dual -track process. I think one is RFPs for low bids as you go forward, but then we've also got to figure out something to do now. We may have to do more than we'd like, but we may also simply have to do it. If you have a house that's burning, you don't say, "Where do I get an alarm system ?" First you need the fire company. You also would get an alarm system over a longer period of time. I think that's kind of where we are. MR. PIRES: Ron, maybe I missed it, I guess, from the perspective of how you're going down this whole chart here. The first discussion item there is trucking at 400,000. Does that cover all of Park Shore, or is that Park Shore plus other areas? MR. HOVELL: Park Shore is roughly 50,000 cubic yards, so the 400,000 is more or less the damage estimate from Tropical Storm Gabrielle. MR. PIRES: The total? MR. HOVELL: The total; Marco, Naples, Park Shore, and Vanderbilt. MR. PIRES: And the priority areas would be -- like Gary was indicating you have situations of possible structural failures and other property issues -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I don't know that that's been confirmed, but I know that we spent a fair amount of time on it in the city. At least we have that fear. Among reasonable people on the staff, they're fearful that we could have a significant structural issue there. It's beyond "how wide is the beach ?" And there may be other areas that I'm not aware of yet that are not within the city limits. But that's the Park Shore area we're talking about. We just really -- given our state of knowledge now, we don't think we can wait until April. We have too much invested. MR. PIRES: If we can somehow split this out as to what aspects from the city's perspective and the staff s perspective require higher priority. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It's not even so much -- I realize I'm, in a sense, the city representative. It's not really the city saying, you know, "me first" or whatever. It am December 6, 200116J happens to be in the city. It's the most significant structural issue that we're aware of. MR. STRAPPONI: It may be approaching an emergency situation or could be if we -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It could be. I don't think we've confirmed it. Maybe Dr. Staiger will have a little more for us, but the concern is there. I don't want to overstate it. MR. PIRES: Ron, also, the trucking -- I noticed that's the only box, I'll call it, that doesn't say, "More in line with FEMA and state expectations." MR. HOVELL: That's a fact. The disaster folks, when they -- as you'll recall, one of the criteria for receiving reimbursement is that it's an engineered and maintained beach. Well, their idea of maintenance is -- unless you're just going out and doing a really small hot spot -- but then, in general, if you're going to do any amount of, you know, what I'll call major renourishment, which 400,000 yards probably meets that definition, their impression or their expectation would be that you're going to restore it to the design template. Ken Humiston handed me just before the meeting -- you know, we're talking about putting 400,000 cubic yards of sand on the beach. With some initial calculations, though, we can probably restore all the beaches to the design template for maybe 700,000. I put 900,000 as my guess before I got Ken's input, but it's maybe 700,000 cubic yards. If you back up for a second and look at the prices -- you know, if you go to a dredging event, the cost per cubic yard will drop significantly from the $20 a yard we've been talking about for our budget for upland sand. MR. ROELLIG: But you don't have a sand source; right? MR. HOVELL: Well, when you say a "sand source," you're talking offshore. MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. HOVELL: I will tell you that in the last go- around -- and this is what's in everybody's mind, and I know it's an education thing to kind of get over it, but the last go- around we restricted the sand search to relatively close to shore. We used a method that was -- although not directly as it turns out, but, in essence, pumping sand directly from the bottom up onto the beach. The only difference was they didn't quite do that. They pumped it into sealed barges where you couldn't see it and moved the barge and then pumped it directly underneath, but they never looked at what they had. There are other dredging methods, making use of a hopper barge, for instance, and I pulled this out of the report that Coastal Planning & Engineering had done related to our failed project describing what those differences are. But the gist of it is, if you go, let's say, 15 or 20 miles offshore and find some really good sand, you can use a hopper dredge -- there's an opportunity to screen that material and specifically exclude anything that might be objectionable. So your risks go down. Your likelihood of finding quality sand goes up because you've expanded the search tremendously. As a matter of fact, Coastal Planning & Engineering has done some work for Lee December 6, 200116J z County and has found some sand in the southwesterly direction from Lee County which puts it kind of northwest of Collier County that would probably be very acceptable to use and more than enough quantity to cover what we need to do. So I won't disagree that we have not specifically done it for ourselves, but I don't think it would take that much to go to them and say, "We want you to make use of the already -known data, start the permitting process, and make plans to do this." MR. ROELLIG: Have they given you a preliminary cost estimate of what that would be? MR. HOVELL: Not in the sense that I have asked for a proposal, because we don't even have them under contract. MR. ROELLIG: You know, I'm not sure it's going to be a lot cheaper than combined trucking. MR. HOVELL: With your permission I'll ask them to answer directly because they're here today. MR. ROELLIG: I'm not asking you to give a final price, but I'm not sure that the trucking -- you know, the one that you couldn't come to an agreement on, you ended up with probably 12.50 a yard; is that it? MR. HOVELL: No. The total price is -- MR. ROELLIG: Oh, I know. What was the price per yard? Or maybe you don't have it offhand. MR. HOVELL: I do somewhere. Let's see. It was in terms of per ton, and it was coming out to $11 a ton just for the trucking and placing, and another -- per ton I think it was more in the neighborhood of $6 or $7 a ton to buy the sand. And then when you add the engineering on top of it, it was coming out to more than $20 a cubic yard. MR. KEEHN: It probably works out to be about 2500 pounds a cubic yard. It depends on how dry it is. THE COURT REPORTER: State your name, please. MR. KEEHN: Steve Keehn. I think 2,500 a cubic yard is the lower -end value. There's an upper -end value also. That's part of the reason it's difficult to convert tons to cubic yards. MR. PIRES: Ron, is it possible -- I guess I'm intrigued by the idea of the predictability aspect with regard to property in the Park Shore area. The first option where it talks about trucking, is that something you can split out even more refined? Like if they have a certain component, would it be more FEMA eligible if you're talking about preserving property? I think that's one of their missions. They're looking at the beach alone as one aspect. MR. HOVELL: If we thought there was an emergency situation, then that clearly falls within the guidelines to be reimbursed for. However, back when this first happened, and again probably at least once or twice in between and as recently as probably a couple days ago, I've talked to people like Ken Humiston in the business of coastal structures. December 6, 20011 6 J And not that we've reviewed specific plans and specifications or drawings for the buildings along the beach, but we don't feel that there's as much concern as perhaps other folks might have intimated or believe there to be. But I think it comes down to somebody needs to do the actual review, and I think somebody in the city is attempting to do that. DR. STAIGER: Yeah. We talked about -- Ron was at the City Council workshop on Monday and briefed council rather extensively. Council asked the manager to get some more information. The city engineer sent some guys out, and I haven't seen the memo yet, but I just talked to my secretary, and she said, basically, he said, "Okay. We've looked at the beach from Vidado Way to Horizon Way, which is the most vulnerable area, and the seawalls are two to four feet more exposed now than they were before." This is just based on where the sand level, obviously, used to be. His memo essentially says, without knowing how deep those walls are -- if they're 10 foot or 12 foot slabs versus something like 8 or 9 -- and we don't know, because they were put in a long time ago, and we don't know the condition of the tie -back system behind them. So his recommendation was that we get out there and do some excavating, you know, and see. I mean, you can jet probe down the face of a seawall and determine how deep it is if you know what you're doing. You basically use a pipe with a hook on the end, and you run it down the wall until you hook it under the wall and then back it out. We may be doing that, and I don't know if we've started that or not. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think -- not to you personally, but I think City Council gave direction to get that done. DR. STAIGER: Well, yeah. That's something that I think engineering is undertaking. They took a look at it, just a visual observation, and said, "All right, two to four feet" -- which in the case of a wall that's already exposed, three to four feet is as much as seven or eight feet of exposure. If it's only a 12 -foot section, then two - thirds of that wall is above, and it should have at least, I would think, 50 percent burial in front of it. The walls look fine. There's no obvious heaving or cracking or anything like that. I know Ken looked at them. But the engineer's suggestion was we might want to get out there and start grading some sand from the berm that has come in. The recovery -- the post -storm recovery has built a berm that's out there away and distant from the seawalls, and it would be to start pushing that berm sand up against the walls to build up some sand in front of them. We discussed on Monday, also, perhaps trucking a certain quantity of sand to Park Shore that we could spread and basically pack against those seawalls to give them a little more stability. Whether we can accomplish that in a way that is reimbursable by FEMA or not, I don't know. The city indicated that they would be willing to do the spreading and grading if the county would truck sand to Horizon Way and dump it there, which was one of the alternatives. But we have not completed an engineering analysis of the thing. The city engineering guys were doing that. But all I know at this point was that they took a look Page 10 December 6, 2001 16J 2 at it and said, "Yeah. If those walls are of minimal" -- you know, "if the wall slabs are of minimal length, they could be vulnerable." MR. SNEDIKER: How much seawall exposure is there now compared to last February or before we did the renourishment last spring? DR. STAIGER: Well, I think in most of those places, before we did the renourishment last spring, there was perhaps four to six feet of wall exposed in some areas. After the renourishment it was up to two or three feet. MR. SNEDIKER: Is there more exposed now than before? DR. STAIGER: There's more exposed now, probably a foot more than there was last spring in places. But it's awfully variable. You know, there's some hot spots there that have a lot more exposure than before. It's basically between Horizon Way and Vidado Way, which is the next access to the south. That's probably 1,000 -- maybe 1,000 feet or less of beach. From Horizon Way north it's a little better. But that's the section that I believe is the southernmost part of Park Shore. Once you get below there, you're in the Moorings. That was the part that was built first by the Lutgerts, and it was in the county at the time, so we don't have much in the line of city records on that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Just to go back, a couple of weeks ago we got a report from the city manager that was alarming, and he's not an alarmist. We could see that there was a significant portion exposed. We're trying to figure that out. The way it relates to this primarily is, I think we're going to need some kind of hierarchy or schematic eventually because we've got timing issues, scope issues, funding issues, and methodology issues, at least those four major areas. Part of what we're talking about is the 50,000- cubic -yard permit that we've got in hand right now, and how can we facilitate the use of that sooner rather than later. MR. HOVELL: Actually, that was the other piece of news I forgot to say. Last week we received a notice to proceed for the other seven beach segments. Because of the way they modified the permit, it was -- they changed the words 50,000 cubic yards "annually" to 50,000 cubic yards "periodically." So we've gone back in and said, "Okay. Let's see. If we want to do 400,000 yards and we already have 50,000 approved, we need 7 more segments at 50,000 each, and they gave us approval to do that. MR. GRAY: As far as -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Pardon me. That's the DEP that does that; right? MR. HOVELL: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: FEMA is the funding mechanism, but they don't actually get involved in permitting. MR. GRAY: I'm getting the sense that we don't have enough information yet to make any decisions about dredging. You folks, if I'm understanding this right, when you're contracted this will be part of your job; is that right? MR. KEEHN: Yes. Page 11 December 6, 200 16J 2 MR. HOVELL: Well, it could be. At this point we don't have a project unless we're willing to make it part of this beach recovery project and specifically ask them to explore dredging. If we decide we're only going to truck, then, no, I'm not going to ask them to do that work. MR. ROELLIG: Well, we need to do the alternative so you can balance it. I mean, if you can't talk about the possibility of dredging it without looking at it -- because when you go for reimbursement, if you show them how much it will cost by dredging and what the time frame will be as opposed to why you had to do it by trucking, I think you'll have a much stronger argument. MR. HOVELL: Well -- MR. ROELLIG: My other view is, if you have an emergency declaration and we're talking to FEMA, we can't sit around for a year wondering whether or not it's an emergency or not. You either do it or you don't if you want to maximize your opportunity for reimbursement. MR. HOVELL: If I could clarify that. The emergency declaration was -- Florida declared the emergency, and that period is over. From a FEMA point of view, recovering the beach is not an emergency issue. If it takes -- most other counties who don't have a permit to do upland trucking are, in fact, pursuing dredging projects. If it takes them two or three years, that's perfectly acceptable to all parties involved. MR. ROELLIG: I thought you said there was an 18 -month limit of time as far as getting FEMA reimbursements. MR. HOVELL: As long as you're diligently pursuing -- MR. ROELLIG: Sothis -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Wait a minute. MR. HOVELL: There's an 18 -month limit that will be extended as long as you're diligently pursuing the project. DR. STAIGER: Coastal Engineering Consultants, Incorporated, had a contract with the county to do a sand - source search. They did part of it back when the previous beach committee was Stakage, Bob Gray, and Dave Roellig. They produced a report on that search. As that whole process wound down, they were in litigation with the county, and they were no longer working for the county, but they did look at offshore sources. They found what they felt was a perfectly reasonable quantity of sand down off of the south end of Key Island in the Big Marco /Capri Pass ebb -shoal system. Part of that is bottom that is actually under the jurisdiction of the Rookery Bay Preserve area, but there is a significant amount of it that isn't. Also, south of Marco on the Cape Romano shoal, there is another huge amount of sand that is available. It's some of that is part of the Ten Thousand Islands Preserve, but a good bit of it isn't. So those sources were located. The difficulty there is it's a pretty long haul to have to do something comparable to what we did in the restoration here, which was to dredge it into barges and then tow the barges to where you need it and then suck it out. Page 12 December 6, 2001 6 2 You can either dump it and then redredge it and pump it to shore, or you can suck it out of the barge, which is what happened the last time. Those sources are fairly remote. They're not that remote for Marco Island. But if you're looking at something like Vanderbilt Beach -- if there is a source up off of the Lee /Collier area, that's a hell of a lot closer than Cape Romano. At any rate, that data was obtained, and it was not -- it was a preliminary search, I think, looking at existing data and a bunch of other stuff. I don't know that they got into any seismic profiling or coring and all of that. MR. ROELLIG: They did. They had samples. DR. STAIGER: They had some samples, I guess. They may have just jet probed. But the next stage or phase they recommended was a much more extensive search with the seismic work that was needed. I mean, that was one of the criticisms that was in the report actually done by CPE of the original work. There wasn't an adequate amount of coring and seismic work done to locate appropriate sand and to define the thickness. So you could start with the work that you guys have already done plus the work that was done by Coastal. I mean, that's work the county paid for. It was preliminary, but it's there. I mean, I've got a copy of the report. I'm sure Ron does too. So there is more than one sand source out there. It might be that for something like Marco and the south end of Naples, one of these southern sources would be appropriate. And if you get to Park Shore and Vanderbilt, you can look somewhere else. But it might be worth getting involved and looking for an offshore sand source, because sooner or later you're probably going to need it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: You know, I perhaps am simplifying it or maybe just not remembering it correctly, but I thought a policy decision had been made after the difficulties of the other big beach renourishment to go with land sourcing. Colonel Mudd and his staff -- I think before you joined the staff, Mr. Hovell -- had done quite a bit of work on that and presented us different samples of potential sources and that type of thing. MR. HOVELL: I don't think that was meant to cover the next major restoration. I think that was meant to cover the interim 50,000 cubic yards a year to kind of continue to maintain the beaches and hopefully defer that big project out there. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Things that might be termed maintained as opposed to renourishment. MR. HOVELL: Right. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Perhaps so. MR. GRAY: As I look at the options here, and based on what I have heard so far, it appears to me that Option 2 probably comes closer to meeting what we need than any of the others. MR. HOVELL: Well, anything except pure trucking -- you know, trucking we can get done the quickest. But even trucking on -- and it would be an area to be defined, I guess. You know, we kind of have a feel for it. Those areas where we're going to have Page 13 December 6, 20011 6 J 2 to execute the rock - removal plan, even under the trucking scenario, are not going to get done for probably more than a year. I think under the current state of things, it's going to be probably this time next year before we're really executing the rock - removal plan. It would have to be after that before we could renourish the area. MR. GRAY: That's my point. The 50,000 that we're going to do in trucking in Option 2 is just about what we need for Park Shore beach, and we don't have the rock issue there as I recall. MR. HOVELL: Right. MR. GRAY: Whereas the other areas, the 350,000, we do have rock issues in a couple of places. So that could be addressed before we got to the point of dredging, which would get us to the total of 400,000 which is, I think, what FEMA -- wasn't that their number? MR. HOVELL: Actually, FEMA does some kind of discounting. The project light from the '95 -96 event is about 10 years. Ken's on the hook to try to do this. But, in essence, with the original design template and then the theoretical last point of retreat 10 years later, FEMA attempts to say, "Well, how long ago did you do that job? Where should you theoretically have been? And where did the storm put you ?" They'll only pay to restore us to that intermediate point, but they expect that since we're going to mobilize and go through the effort of repairing the beaches that we're going to restore it to the design template. All the rest of that is going to be on our shoulders to prepare for financial responsibility. MR. GRAY: Which then could take you into one of the other options. That's what you're saying. MR. HOVELL: Yes. I would certainly say that whenever we get around to maintaining the beach in whatever we do -- I mean, let's say we were somehow able to go out and do the 400,000 yards over the next four months. If we then got hit with a storm during the next hurricane cycle, all of that would not play into FEMA's review of what's eligible for reimbursement. They would still be looking at what was the original design template and where should you have been and not what did you just repair it to. Therefore, you know, it would be a lesser amount that we would get. Whereas, if we restored all the way to the design template and then said, "We're less than a year into our useful life of this project," we would increase the amount of restoration that FEMA would pay for. MR. PIRES: Ron, with regard to the phrase in the second one where it says, "dune restoration only," where is that anticipated to occur? MR. HOVELL: Well, to me there's kind of two ways to approach doing something less than the whole 400,000 yards in the trucking mode. One would be to just do the whole 50,000 on Park Shore, and then Park Shore is taken care of, but we haven't done anything anywhere else. The other way would be to go around and take a look at all the beaches and attempt to describe how much would be needed to put it up against the December 6, 20016J seawalls to restore the dunes in those areas where they got flattened out, but to hit all the beaches. MR. PIRES: That's more like Option No. 3, which has 100,000 for dune restoration and 50,000 for Park Shore and -- MR. HOVELL: I was just throwing those numbers out as sort of my guess. What Ken had given me here was -- if I'm reading this right -- do you have a copy of this, Ken? Is it fair to say that between 30,000 and 40,000 yards for the whole county would restore the dunes, or am I missing the way this was written? MR. HUMISTON: That's right. Just doing restoration though. That wouldn't do anything with the flat beach berm part of it. MR. HOVELL: Right. When you say "dune," you're not doing the ten -to -one slope then either. MR. HUMISTON: Right. The beaches typically have a flat berm that's at an elevation of plus five, and then on land you have a dune that increases the elevation by several feet. We lost a lot of that dune during the storm. So just to restore that part of the dune that was lost it would be in the neighborhood of 30,000 or 40,000 cubic yards. MR. PIRES: And the agencies look very favorably upon the dune - restoration aspect? MR. HOVELL: I think, again, they're just into a mathematical exercise, if you will. They're going to calculate a quantity of sand that they're going to pay us for. MR. PIRES: I guess what I'm getting at is priorities to sort of try and see what the highest priorities are. If it's Park Shore for fifty thousand, dune restoration at thirty or forty -- because that way you have that particular aspect of the beach that's been restored, which from an engineering standpoint, I guess, or beach engineering standpoint or coastal standpoint it's sort of second in priority it seems like. MR. HOVELL: Yeah. I think most everybody would agree that doing the storm protection should be the first priority. Then raising the height of the beaches should be the second priority because it does provide storm protection, but the dunes, I think, are probably more important. MR. PIRES: It's kind of like a blend. MR. HOVELL: When you did those calculations and when we say the word "dune," were you looking at areas where there's seawalls and excluding those from meaning dunes, or were you including piling some up in front of those? MR. HUMISTON: It just includes the Vanderbilt, Park Shore, and Naples area. It doesn't include Marco Island because there really was no dune issue on Marco Island. It's just within those project limits. Where there's a seawall with no dune, we did allow for a certain amount of fill in front of the seawall to establish the small dune. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Funding of these alternatives varies. We have been talking about 75 percent coming back to FEMA and then the state picking up half of the remaining 25 which leaves 12 1/2 percent for the county. Page 15 December 6, 20011 b J 2 MR. HOVELL: Well, of the quantity that they approved as related or, you know, due to the storm damage. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I was going to follow up and note that every scenario that you assume for the sake of this spreadsheet is a 250,000 cubic yard quantity that FEMA and the state would participate in. MR. HOVELL: Right. So out of that 250,000 cubic yards, we would only have to pay 12 1/2 percent of the cost of that quantity. Anything beyond that is for us to pay for. MR. STRAPPONI: Ron, I have a question. The 400,000 that we lost to Gabrielle, have we at any time since then reassessed it to determine if it's still 400,000? Does nature put some back? MR. HOVELL: Ken, am I reading this right to say that maybe the total quantity is only 250,000 or thereabouts? MR. HUMISTON: That's right. MR. HOVELL: So it's not as high as 400,000. MR. STRAPPONI: So what we really need is around two fifty. MR. HOVELL: It looks like it. MR. STRAPPONI: Now, my next question is, you presented this committee with five options, and based on the limited amount of information that I heard today, I tend to agree with Mr. Gray that No. 2 seems to be the most attractive. What I would like to know is which option you and the public utilities engineering department would recommend and why. MR. GRAY: I was going to say the same thing. Do you -all have a strong recommendation? MR. HOVELL: I would say, you know, anything I would tell you at this point would be my personal recommendation. It's not something that I have had a chance to brief anybody on or get even the Coastal engineers to give me their opinion on. MR. STRAPPONI: We'll let you share that with us. MR. GRAY: You're the closest person to it. MR. HOVELL: Well, I appreciate that, so I'll tell you my limited thinking on it. I keep getting told this a lot when people disagree with what I say. You know, I'm the new guy, so I'll just tell you what I think as the new guy. I tend to think that doing some amount of trucking to hit more or less the whole county to restore at least the dunes to some degree and maybe even including at the face of the dunes some kind of ten -to -one slope, so maybe a higher quantity than what Ken threw out, but some amount of trucking for all the beaches in the short term, and that might even include next winter as something we should probably pursue. I think rather than expend the rest of the FEMA money on continued trucking efforts, I would tend to say to put us in the best situation possible for another storm recovery, we should make plans and probably based on the rock - removal issues, maybe at least two years down the road, do the major renourishment which might be more in the Page 16 December 6, 20011 V J 2 neighborhood of seven hundred thousand cubic yards, less whatever we do by truck, so maybe it would be five or six hundred thousand cubic yards. You know, make that our plan and then go about trying to execute it. The problem I tend to have is, when you've got a million options and you, in essence, want to keep all your options open and pursue them all at once, there's just not enough resources to attack all of them. MR. GRAY: Is that Option 2 or Option 3 what you just said? MR. KROESCHELL: It's not an option. MR. GRAY: In between. MR. PIRES: A modified 3. MR. HOVELL: It's probably somewhere between 4 and 5. MR. GRAY: Really? MR. HOVELL: Yeah. Some amount of trucking, but the total quantity would be more in the neighborhood of 700,000 cubic yards. MR. GRAY: Okay. MR. HOVELL: The bigger number, not just staying with 400,000. MR. STRAPPONI: That's dredge numbers? Seven hundred thousand in dredge numbers? MR. HOVELL: Yeah. If you take those bottom two -- actually, that adds up to nine fifty. If you take those two that right now say nine fifty and change that to about seven hundred total, based on what Ken gave me, I think that's what I'm talking about. MR. STRAPPONI: Well, from a timing standpoint, if we were going to do hydraulic restoration, these April predictions seem a little optimistic to me. MR. HOVELL: Oh, the April 2002 you mean? MR. STRAPPONI: Yeah. MR. GRAY: That's just for dune restoration. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Each method or each alternative has an element of trucking in it. The first line item on each is trucking. MR. HOVELL: They all involve a certain amount of trucking. If we were trying to do 100,000 yards, could we complete it by April 2002? I think we could choose to complete it by 2002. I kind of doubt that we will choose it just because of tourist season, but we could choose to do it. MR. STRAPPONI: What can we do, if anything, and how quickly could we start to have any impact on tourist season -- I mean -- MR. HOVELL: The only option I know of right now is -- MR. STRAPPONI: We've missed that window of opportunity; is that correct? MR. HOVELL: Well, before Monday I would have said yes without saying anything else. As of Monday morning when I went to the Naples City Council workshop, they, in essence, offered -- and this is the piece I didn't get into the details Page 17 December 6, 20011 6 J 2 about. The proposal that we received from that debris - removal contractor was made up of two parts, the trucking part and the placing and grading. The total price was more than 22 percent higher than what we previously paid. In the breakdown trucking was much more in line. It was the placing and grading that was driving the price through the roof. City Council offered that they have equipment that they could potentially use on the beaches to do the placing and grading, and would the county consider, in essence, hiring them as that part of the contract and reimburse them for their efforts. So we're kind of exploring that right now. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: At cost plus the average staff rates. MR. PIRES: For county or city? MR. ROELLIG: You guys should give us a -- THE COURT REPORTER: One at a time, please. MR. HOVELL: On the contract proposal? MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. HOVELL: Their final proposal was about $500,000 just for -- MR. ROELLIG: Can't you give it to us by quantity or yard? Just pick a unit. MR. HOVELL: Okay. I'm using tons because the only sand pit that's approved right now sells by the tons. Their final proposal was $7.48 a ton for the trucking, which was just under 10 percent more than we paid back in April. Their final placing and grading price was $3.14 a ton, which was almost 70 percent more than we paid in April. MR. ROELLIG: It sounds to me like what we should do is accept their trucking and either have the city do placing and grading or go out and find a contractor to do the placing and grading. That's certainly not a high -tech thing. I don't understand why they're charging so much for it. Pushing sand around is not -- MR. HOVELL: Again, if we want to go out for contract, now we're talking -- what are we going to do in April? I already have something in the works to give us a contract to do something in April. I think the question is, what can we do in December? The only thing we can do in December is potentially make use of the city. MR. STRAPPONI: Truck. MR. ROELLIG: That sounds like a good option. MR. HOVELL: Well, assuming we can all work it out. There's some issues about -- you know, if it was a contractor, we would have a contract. Typically when we do interagency agreements with the city we, in fact, do have a contract. If we were going to go through those bureaucratic hoops, it would probably be February 1 st before we had a contract in place with the city. MR. SNEDIKER: Can that be accelerated some way? THE COURT REPORTER: One at a time, please. MR. HOVELL: It's not the city's fault. It's the fact that Christmas is coming. The only Board of County Commissioners meeting between now and February is next week, December 11th, and then next one is not until January 8th, and we've long since missed '.:- December 6, 2001 16J the window for next Tuesday. MR. ANDERSON: We can probably arrange, you know, with a priority item, a special meeting. Sometimes they have workshops or special meetings. They meet frequently, so we probably can work on that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Dr. Staiger, first of all, for the engineering firms, are you here listening today, or is there a presentation that you intended to make? DR. STAIGER: Well, considering -- MR. ANDERSON: Ken's got a presentation later on. MR. HUMISTON: Mostly listening. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I mean, instead of the board going around and around -- with all the pros sitting out there, so to speak, for this presentation unless we just want to go on forever -- MR. HUMISTON: I provided Ron some information, and I just came in case there was any questions about it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Great. MR. HUMISTON: I would be glad to answer any questions about it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Dr. Staiger, we had broached the idea of simply moving sand on the beach in some areas for dune restoration. That last -- to a nonengineer and somebody who doesn't have to go through the permitting process personally, that has a certain appeal. Does that have any practical application? DR. STAIGER: Yeah. That's what we've been talking about. Basically, if we can get some of our equipment that we already have and maybe rent another front -end loader, which the city can do, they could dump the sand at Horizon Way, and we could truck it down the beach. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I mean, we had talked about different areas that a berm had build up -- DR. STAIGER: Oh, yeah. We could -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- and to move the berm back to -- DR. STAIGER: We could do that -- THE COURT REPORTER: Wait, wait. One at a time. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- more of a dune position. DR. STAIGER: We could do that independent of bringing any sand in. We have to get a permit for that from the state. That's called beach scraping, which they tend to not be terribly in favor of. They don't like scraping the beach because they think people tend to scrape a little too much. We might be able to get a permit for something, but it's difficult to tell. I haven't broached the subject with DEP. If we truck in some sand and place it up against the walls -- if we do it all above the mean -high water line, it's a little easier to do. It's when you're putting it out in the water that it gets tricky. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, if the city has the equipment and can facilitate Page 19 December 6, 2001 16J 2 it, that sounds like the best short-term solution. DR. STAIGER: That's something I think we can -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: But I wasn't saying -- maybe this is in addition and not an either /or, but the idea that we had talked about not grading and trucking sand but moving the sand that's there. DR. STAIGER: What the question was, and I think that's what Ron alluded to, was if the city did this and provided that service to the county for spreading and grading the material, then the city would want to get reimbursed, and could we do this in a way that didn't require working out formal interlocal agreement between the two governments which would be -- you know, that has Council action and Board of County Commissioners action, our attorneys and their attorneys, and by the time you get all that worked out, we're in March. MR. PIRES: Which year? DR. STAIGER: If we can do something more informal and still -- MR. ANDERSON: Like a sole source kind of arrangement. DR. STAIGER: We haven't got to that point yet, but that's one of the things in this mix of alternatives. If they bring the sand down there, can we work out a way that we can move it around and get some reimbursement for that effort, and I don't know the answer to that. MR. PIRES: Ron -- MR. ROELLIG: I think there's a different way to do this. My understanding and from my experience there's no reason why the city couldn't go in for reimbursement for the movement from FEMA and the county go in for purchasing and bringing the sand to them. We'd have two -- why are you shaking your head no? MR. HOVELL: Well -- MR. ROELLIG: I see it happen. MR. HOVELL: Well, but the problem is -- MR. ROELLIG: I've got a problem because I hear a lot of ifs and buts and so forth, but I think we need to move this along. If the city is willing to do that, then I don't know why the city can't go in for reimbursement separate from the county. MR. HOVELL: FEMA would reimburse the city or the county for placing sand on the beach, but for moving sand around on the beach -- MR. ROELLIG: No, I'm not talking about that. I mean trucking it in and having the city -- MR. HOVELL: Oh, yeah. MR. ROELLIG: Rather than have the county go into a procurement contract with the city for the placement, just have the city do the placement and then seek reimbursement from FEMA for that, particularly for the Park Shore segment. MR. GRAY: I'm almost afraid to say this because it sounds too simple, but I'm going to say it anyway. Why can't the county move the sand around on a city beach? 1.,__ f December 6, 200'16J 2 Even though it's theoretically in the city, it's still part of the county. Why does the city have to participate? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Al, does the county have graders and front -end loaders and stuff to do that? MR. MADSEN: We have -- THE COURT REPORTER: Your name, sir? MR. MADSEN: My name is Allen Madsen. The road and bridge department has graders, loaders, etc. That equipment is scheduled well in advance. I think that they're probably going to see that they're overloaded with work as far as keeping the roads open and passable. So they'll say they have an equipment problem or manpower shortage. MR. GRAY: But is that worth a try? I mean, it sounds like that's a stumbling block. Having the city and county involved -- basically the beaches are a county situation, so why should we even talk about having the city involved with their equipment? MR. HOVELL: I think we can certainly ask. MR. PIRES: I guess, Ron, I'd like to get a sense from this committee on the east end -- I think we would like to have -- is there some way to give some direction to you or to give something to the County Commission that we think it's a high - priority item to take care of these two aspects, the Park Shore and the dune restoration aspect, as soon as possible through a trucking mechanism and through a cooperative venture with the city on an expedited basis and/or to mobilize to the extent they can without taking away from other critical county projects the county's resources that they have in heavy equipment. I mean, I recognize the board is meeting next Tuesday, and we can't be on that agenda. They don't meet again until January. They meet again -- I know January 8th is a County Commission date. January 22nd is the next county commission meeting date. MR. HOVELL: Yes. MR. PIRES: So perhaps at least, if nothing else, get a sense on January 8th of -- get some direction or guidance then. I think that the city would be happy to send a representative to that. If we can get something that we can send to the county commission to let them know of our concerns and what we think is an urgent issue to help you get that space on the agenda -- I know sometimes every- other -week agendas don't -- they get filled up pretty quickly. I mean, is that something we can help you on as well as help the city and help the county overall? MR. ROELLIG: Maybe another question is, can the city do it for less than $3.14? MR. HOVELL: I think that is a good question. It's one that I had to ask because, from my point of view, I'm managing the project and the budget. I had to ask the city, "Well, amongst all the other things we have to work out, I think you have to give me your cost estimate for doing this." MR. ROELLIG: Sure. Well, why don't we do that? I don't quite see what the Page 21 December 6 2001 16J problem is. In fact, I make a motion that we proceed with the 50,000 yards or whatever the quantity is for Park Shore with the stipulation of to use your existing contract or a combination of sand and trucking along with the city, whichever is most economical, just to get the project moving. MS. LUPO: Can I add something? MR. SNEDIKER: Go ahead. MS. LUPO: I was under the impression that the priority was first putting the thirty to forty that you needed on the dunes and seawalls, not fifty for the Park Shore. If we're going to do fifty for trucking -- I thought that first fifty should be used for the dunes and seawalls, not Park Shore. If we're going to do a hundred for trucking, then we have the thirty to forty plus the extra fifty for Park Shore. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Maybe facts have changed. I've understood that Park Shore was the highest. There's a lot we want to do. Maybe that's not the actual case anymore, but that's my understanding. MR. ROELLIG: Well, Park Shore is the emergency situation; right? MR. GRAY: That's a dune situation there too. MS. LUPO: Well, I thought Park Shore was the place we didn't have to worry about the rock situation, but if you were going to do the prioritization of what's best for the county as a whole as far as what needs the sand, the dunes need the sand first with the seawalls, and that was the thirty to forty quantity. MR. ROELLIG: I think it's the Park Shore seawalls. Are we talking about two different locations? MR. HOVELL: Yes, I think we are a little bit. I mean, I think all the options would include some amount of trucking, but I think the two basic options for expending or, you know, using those trucking resources is either to just focus on Park Shore or review the whole county and focus on dune restoration, you know, in front of seawalls so Park Shore would be part of that equation, but using that same sand budget in one of two ways: Either completely restoring Park Shore beach and leaving everything else alone or spreading that out amongst the whole county. I would tend to think that the dune height restoration for storm protection would be a higher priority than restoring 100 percent of Park Shore beach. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, in some cases there is a threat to the seawall, and I understand we're not sure of that now, but how much -- can you estimate at least for discussion purposes now how much quantity that would require? MR. HOVELL: For Park Shore? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Not the entire restoration, but to bring the dune level at the seawall back to where it was before the storm. MR. HOVELL: Something like ten to twenty thousand yards instead of the whole fifty thousand yards. MR. SNEDIKER: We only put 35,000 there last spring. Now I'm not sure if all of Page 22 December 6, 200116J 2 the 35,000 got there. Did it? DR. STAIGER: Last spring? MR. GRAY: We put 38,000 there. MR. SNEDIKER: Did it all get there, though? MR. GRAY: Yeah. DR. STAIGER: Yeah. MR. HOVELL: Well, it was meant to be fifty, so yes. MR. GRAY: No, 12,000 went to Marco Island. MR. SNEDIKER: Fifteen went to Marco Island. MR. HOVELL: Ken probably remembers because he had to write the report. MR. HUMISTON: Those numbers were in tons, because that's how the quantity was figured. But as we talked about before, a ton is less than a cubic yard. It takes about 1 1/4 tons to make a cubic yard, so the actual quantities were a little bit less. There was about 28,000 yards, I think, that ended up on Park Shore. MR. SNEDIKER: So what we really need is ten to twenty thousand yards to take care of Park Shore's immediate needs; is that accurate? MR. HOVELL: I think so. MR. SNEDIKER: Why don't we just focus on getting that done? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We're also talking -- because none of us are experts in this, we're still lacking quite a bit of technical data. We have a feeling about things, and we can look with our eyes and say this is what we think. On the other hand, it's December. If we're going to do anything, we really don't have much time. MR. HOVELL: That is the big handicap for this area. Between turtle season and then choosing not to -- and to a certain extent it's just the practicality of trying to drive all those trucks during the tourist season. But when you block out January, February, and March, it doesn't leave you a whole lot of time to do a whole lot of work over the winter. MR. PIRES: Ron, following up on what Ashley was saying, if it's ten to twenty thousand for Park Shore and thirty to forty thousand for dune restoration in a fifty thousand budget, you can do both is what you're saying or what it appears? MS. LUPO: The initial 50,000 trucking, can you do both? MR. HOVELL: If we put the first 30,000 yards towards dune restoration, we would probably restore most of the dunes in the county. Then the remaining 20,000, if you want to call that a budget, you know, then maybe you could start saying, "Well, now out of all the beach segments, which one is the most free of other encumbrances and in most need of sand ?" Then I would tend to go back and say, "Yeah, let's finish Park Shore," because both Naples and Vanderbilt have some complications with rocks and Marco really doesn't need it that bad. Plus, as we'll discuss in awhile, when you dredge Caxambas Pass, the sand goes right to where we're talking about trucking it to this year, so how much do we really need to truck, you know. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Two questions. If we have the trucking permit now Page 23 December 6, 2001 16J 2 for 400,000 cubic yards and if we as a community were to recommend leaning in the longer term more towards a focus on dredging probably, then what happens to those permits? Can they be converted? Do they become useless? MR. HOVELL: Well, technically they're not -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Can they serve or last as long as eight years to serve for our expected 50,000 cubic yards maintenance needs? MR. HOVELL: The upland sand permit doesn't expire until 2006, but the notices to proceed for the 400,000 yards do have expiration dates, and I would have to go back and reread them, but it only gives us about a year or maybe two at the most to truck the 400,000 yards. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So even if in the intermediate term we go more towards a dredging focus, then we've accomplished something. We've got permits in place that will make the annual maintenance needs easier to accomplish. Is that a correct statement? MR. HOVELL: What we got was a permit modification from 50,000 cubic yards annually to 50,000 cubic yards periodically. Under that permit I had asked for the notices to proceed for all those beach segments which happens to add up to the 400,000 yards. Those notices to proceed will expire, but they're also not overly hard to get. I mean, certainly within a month you could get it. MR. KROESCHELL: Mr. Chairman, there was a motion on the floor. If he still wants to make it, I'll second it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Before we take a vote on that, we have members of the public here, and we may want to hear from the members of the public. Does anyone wish to address us? Mr. Kelly, it's a make -shift setup here, obviously. Maybe you can just come up towards the front row so more people can be closer to you. MR. PIRES: Is it possible to have the motion restated also since we've had so much discussion? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We'll do that before we vote. I want to make sure we have all the input before we actually start voting on motions. MR. KELLY: Thank you, Mr. Chairman. My name is Colin Kelly with Parker Beach Restoration. I'd just like to ask, have any of you members gone down and looked at the sand web project? (Mr. Kroeschell and Mr. Snediker raised their hands.) MR. KELLY: We think that in three weeks time -- although the weather has not been conducive because we were looking for a westerly blow instead of a northeastern, but preliminary indications say that it's accumulated quite a bit of sand. I'd just like to -- we haven't discussed it, but there has been a major change with DEP as you know. Mr. Devereau (phonetic) is no longer -- he's resigning after this month. Our sources say that we're going to find a more benevolent DEP towards the permitting process and the use of Page 24 December 6 2001 ,0 16J innovative technology such as the sand web system. Our sources tell us that there's money available for this should Collier County decide to apply for it. The contributing factor is somewhat negotiable. So I would like in the midst of this -- I know we're coming down to, it seems like, between trucking and dredging, and I'm not saying that's a wrong decision for you people, but I would like you to keep an open mind of what's being done right now in Collier County and go take a look at it. I think you'll see a nice, natural wide beach being formed in less than three weeks time, and we haven't even hit the coldfront season where we'll get wave action out of the west. Please consider this. We're a country in war, and dollars are going to matter. No matter whose dollars they are, they're going to matter. I think that when you look and see that we're talking about three times as much beach using the sand web system, and we're willing to contract with the county at $8 a cubic yard finished on the beach in place -- and we only get paid for performance. If we don't perform, we don't get paid. That's still not bad for the county to consider. MR. GRAY: I have a question. Your system has been around for a short period of time. I'm sorry, but I haven't seen the results. I will take your word for it, or if some of the people here have seen it, maybe they can tell us. When could we expect to see, let's say, some real good results or exactly what we could expect? MR. KELLY: That's a good question. Preliminarily from our surveys and what indications I've gotten from talking to the surveyor, we are looking at an accumulation now of anywhere from a foot plus on each of the station markers. Just in rough figures, I don't know, but it's going to come in somewhere maybe between 10,000 cubic -- we don't know, but I think we're going to be impressed. We're going to be impressed one way or another, either in a bad direction or a positive direction. Visually I think we've got a beautiful beach, and I invite each and every one of you -- we'll make our equipment available. We have a mule down there to take you the full length of the growing field and let you see. Then go take a look at the north side of the pier and the rest of Collier County. I think you would be hard- pressed to deny that it's the most beautiful beach in Collier County. Take a look. That's all we ask. MR. GRAY: You mean right now we -- MR. KELLY: Right now. MR. GRAY: Well, my question was, is there some point in the future when we maybe could even know more than what we know now? Is this a continual thing? MR. KELLY: I wish I could say this to you, but we're contracted to go to May. We don't know. We're going to have a westerly blow this Saturday, so the weatherman says. We would like to invite you next week to come down. I invite you today to go look at it. Right now we've had very limited wave energy. Go take a look at the beach. I encourage you to. You're the beach committee. You're the Coastal Area Advisory Committee. I Page 25 December 6, 200 16 J 2. implore you to go take a look with your own eyes. MR. GRAY: I agree. MR. STRAPPONI: Mr. Kelly, we certainly appreciate your input. In reference to Mr. Hovell's memo to the county manager, he states that the web system placement for next winter is something that they were going to have to take a hard look at. I think the motion that's before us right now, is something that we need to talk about because it has to do with the sand dunes, and I'm not so sure the web system is having much impact on the sand dunes. MR. KELLY: Well, I don't disagree with you, but I'll say that we've accumulated in two or three weeks time a two -foot vertical of sand. With the existing permitting you have -- there's some serious eroded beaches in Collier County right now, like 30th Avenue South towards Gordon Pass. I'm not saying you don't have erosion problems elsewhere. If you want to see at high tide no beach, take a look at 30th Avenue South. You're going to see water in the yards. Now, we believe that in two or three weeks' time if we put two foot of sand on the beach or a foot of sand on the beach -- there's a point that maybe as we talked about scraping and grading that we can take some original sand, some natural sand, and push up and see sand dunes with it at the county's discretion. We feel like if we have the success in the next five months as we had in the first month, which is the lowest wave energy month we'll have, you'll have sand there, and you've already paid for it. MR. GRAY: How much sand are you talking about potentially? MR. KELLY: Well, if we're talking about 30,000 cubic yards for the whole coastline of Collier County, it certainly bears to reason that we would have enough sand within our project area -- say a mile if Collier County did it in mile increments -- we would have enough sand there, we feel, to build it with sand dunes. That's not impossible that we can build the dunes with sand that you've already paid for at $8 a cubic yard. MR. ROELLIG: Excuse me. Is it the city or the county monitoring it? MR. KELLY: The city is. MR. ROELLIG: Will we be getting reports on how much has accumulated from your surveys? DR. STAIGER: Yeah. I was going to give a report on it later. MR. ROELLIG: Okay. Fine. MR. KELLY: I'm sorry, Jon. I didn't mean to jump ahead. DR. STAIGER: No problem. MR. GRAY: I think it's pertinent now. DR. STAIGER: Well, the project started at the beginning of November. They got all of the nets installed by mid November. We are doing the first monthly performance monitoring this week. The sea systems will be here next week to carry the monitoring. They're doing wave -depth profiles, and we have a guy coming in with depth- sounding equipment, and they will go out an additional couple thousand feet into the Gulf. That Page 26 December 6, 20011 6 J 2 data should be compiled in some kind of, you know, understandable format, I would think, probably within two weeks. Then we'll have, essentially, the first of the monthly monitoring reports available. From just looking at the system, it appears where the nets are we have moved the mean -high water line gulfward probably 30 to 40 feet. I mean, you have a berm where the net started and, you know, you've got a little bit of a depression, and then there's another berm out there that wasn't there before. Probably as Colin said, you've got a vertical accumulation of one to two feet of sand. It depends. Some of the nets -- the nets are six feet high in some places. After this little bit of weather we had a week or two ago, there was two or three feet of net buried, but that's not an even layer. It undulates. So if you even it all off, it's probably a foot to two feet of sand added in that area. There does not appear to be perceptible loss of sand either upgrading or downgrading, that is north or south of the net installation. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: You mean loss from the Parker web system or loss from mother nature? DR. STAIGER: No. Loss from the beach on either side of it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: But due to just weather patterns are you referring to MR. KELLY: Erosion. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- or due to the web system gathering sand and therefore perhaps -- DR. STAIGER: Yeah, the web system. That's our concern. If you build a growing field that's too permeable, you are going to catch sand which will then starve the beach elsewhere. It doesn't appear to be happening, but these are very subtle changes. We're only talking about the first month, so we need to monitor it. That's part of the whole experiment, to monitor this thing in detail on both sides of it and within it throughout the duration of the experiment and then for, I don't know, a year or two afterwards. At any rate, the thing appears to be working. The area just immediately up from the net installation, which is just between 15th Avenue South and the pier, is an area that has been kind of a hot spot for awhile. Like, 13th or 14th is a highly erosive area or at least one that has a little beach, and that doesn't seem to be any worse than it always was. So, you know, things are looking good. It's difficult to look at it and try to quantify it because you really need the survey data because we don't know what's going on offshore. I mean, there's some topographic changes. You can see some sand bar system changes when you get -- if you get on the pier, there's kind of a crescent - shaped bar between the northern nets and the pier that didn't used to be there. Now, what that's all about, we don't know. At any rate, we'll have a better idea probably within the next week and a half or two weeks. I know that Crawford -- Page 27 December 6, 200116J MR. KELLY: Well, I talked to Todd Rhodes (phonetic) yesterday. We had a conference. Essentially every survey line they took is a cut bigger, so that accumulated sand -- what they were telling me -- DR. STAIGER: Fill. MR. KELLY: Well, it's fill, meaning it's higher than what it was is what he was saying. To bring it back to grade, we would have to cut each -- I guess -- and I'm not trying to muddy the waters, but I'm just asking you to go down and take a look and use your own eyes and your own judgment, and that way it improves your knowledge of what's going on. Take a look. And, again, take a look at the quality of the sand. It's beautiful. It's absolutely beautiful. MR. GRAY: There was another question I had, Jon. The quality of the sand, it's native sand, and I'm sure it's -- DR. STAIGER: Well, basically the system is intercepting the sand that's moving, you know, in the wave action which tends to be finer, medium course and finer sand, and not a lot of rock or anything like that. So even if there was rock in the system, it tends to not get trapped so, you know, it's very nice material. It's what was there. That is an area that has been -- that had some rock problems that were excavated and sifted two or three times. So I think as far as the rock removal effort in that part of the beach goes, it's been accomplished. So the sand that's down there is good sand, and this system is bringing in that material, which is nice material. MR. KELLY: Again, not to confuse things, but if you want to see -- Collier County has serious problems with 30th Street South and those homes. The water is at the seawall. We believe or we have reason to believe that the DEP and the permitting and the funding of the sand web system would be more favorably received than ever. We're not seeing it as a panacea for Collier County's problems, absolutely not, but we certainly deserve to be in another area in your group of instruments you use to put Collier County beaches back so that the tourists and the residents can enjoy them. We certainly encourage you to come down. If you would like to give me a call at Parker Beach Restoration, I'll make available to any member here our vehicle to take you the whole length and let you see it for yourself. Kick the tires and see what you think. MR. ROELLIG: It's only a half mile, so it's not too hard to walk. MR. KELLY: It's not too hard, but then again, I think Dr. Staiger brought out a good point. The greatest fear for the intelligencia of this industry is that we're going to erode the downside drill. See for yourself if that's true. MR. KROESCHELL: Mr. Chairman, I believe we should move on. We'll look at the report the next time. MR. KELLY: Thank you for your time. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Will do. MR. SNEDIKER: Can we get a copy of the report with our minutes next time or at least have the meeting itself -- December 6, 2001 6 J MR. HOVELL: When they're available, yes. MR. GRAY: I just have one question. This was something that the city started, this sand web thing? MR. HOVELL: Yes. MR. GRAY: Does the county have any problem with this or any comments about it? MR. HOVELL: I think the only thing we have to keep in mind is, you know -- yes, we'll get the monthly reports. We'll get the -- when they pull the nets out in late April, I imagine there will be some kind of report at that point. But I think -- as Jon said, I think from a state point of view, I think the monitoring requirements go on for a year or even two. Certainly today I would tend to guess that planning on using the sand web system either this year or next year anywhere other than where it's currently permitted is probably not very likely to happen. Now, longer term -- two or three or four years down the road as thing change with DEP and the experiment is finished and the reports are done, yes, it may become more and more possible to make use of it, but in the short term I would tend to say it's not very likely. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I was going to say that, too, because it's enough to peek one's interest with the early results. I don't know if the correct term is "experimental," but it's basically an experimental permit. They're going to, I assume, want to see certainly the data for the project when it's in place and then follow up to see if the sand stays there in the same fashion and that type of thing. So it's just something for us to keep in mind as we take the intermediate and long -term approach. MR. HOVELL: I was wandering through the Florida State Statutes related to the beach erosion control program, and this one -- 161.09, I think, it's more related to what they spent their money on. But nevertheless, it's interesting that the goals of their program include maximizing the infusion of beach - quality sand into the system, not moving around what's there. So, you know, either something like this is going to have to change if they really are going to be make longer -term use based on experimental results, or you're really not going to see them going out on a limb to spend money on something that -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: This is sort of -- MR. HOVELL: -- the statute says doesn't meet the goals. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It's sort of cutting edge. We'll know in several years if this is going to be easily done or not. MR. ANDERSON: The other thing I would like to mention is that there is a change in the administration underway of the DEP in Tallahassee as far as the beach program is concerned. So we may see some less conservatism coming from the state down the line, but we'll watch that closely. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Dr. Staiger. Page 29 December 6, 2001 16J 2 DR. STAIGER: Yeah. Just amplifying on what you just said, we got a pretty strong reading from DEP in this year -long effort we went through to get the permits for this experiment. They didn't want to see any more experiments until they saw how this one worked. But Kerby Green is no longer the deputy director of DEP. Al Devereau is out as the director of beaches and coastal systems. The beaches and coastal systems program has been placed into water resources -- I think it's water resources and DEP, so they're reorganizing things. As Colin said there may be a different level of scrutiny, and there may be more sympathy for the project in the new administration up there. It certainly wouldn't hurt when the contracts are signed with the coastal engineering firms for the county to have one of those firms tasked with looking at, you know, could they get a permit elsewhere for another project using the Parker system. I mean, six months ago I would have said, you know, based on what we went through to get our permit, no way, but it's a different regime, and it may well be something that's now feasible. So at least it might be worth looking at because if they say, "Okay. We'll wait and see how the data from the Naples beach goes, but you can try it again somewhere else," the big stumbling block is the monitoring that we have to do which is horribly expensive. We've got to have somebody out there looking at those nets all day, every day, around the clock. They have to be inspected every two hours, and in order to do that with 36 nets you've got one person basically walking the nets. By the time they get done at one end, they're back at the other starting over again. That cost is very expensive. If you subtract that out of the project, then it becomes much more competitive because it's -- you know, the sand -- the cost per cubic yard for the sand or just for the netting is not that bad; it's all this other stuff you have to do along with it. So it might be worth pursuing, you know, can they do it again somewhere else with less monitoring. They may say -- the state may say no, the state may say yes, but it's probably worth looking at. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We're not going to, Mr. Kelly, go through that whole thing. I wanted you to have the opportunity to introduce the experiment and introduce the system to the committee today because I didn't know if everyone was familiar with it. We'll have plenty of opportunities to watch it develop and to hear presentations. But I did want to consider all these options fully, because there are a lot of them, and there are different layers here to consider. Mr. Roellig, you had a motion on the table. MR. ROELLIG: Would it be possible to get that from the court reporter? THE COURT REPORTER: I have no idea where it is. MR. ROELLIG: Okay. No problem. THE COURT REPORTER: It's not in English. I'm sorry. And I'm going to need to change my paper soon. MR. ROELLIG: It's probably simpler to start over. Page 30 16J 2 December 6, 2001 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: You don't have to repeat it from memory, but maybe the content -- MR. PIRES: Mr. Chairman, the court reporter may need a paper break soon, so I don't know if you want to do that now or -- THE COURT REPORTER: I've got about six more minutes of paper. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We'll finish this item and then take a five - minute break, so if you want to restate the motion. MR. ROELLIG: I move that we proceed with the 50,000- cubic -yard placement as soon as possible for material from the upland source with the distribution or locations to be decided. I'm looking at involving the city, if financially feasible, as far as the placement goes so that we can have construction started in the near future and completed before we start turtle season. I think that was the gist of my motion. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Would you add to that encouragement to the county -- we talked earlier about the increased price per unit, and the commission is concerned about that. With over a 400,000- cubic -yard allotment, that would be a lot of money. With 50,000, which we're deeming almost emergency type of activity, I would hope -- you know, it's a little more than 10 percent of the project and a little bit more than a 2 percent cost increase if you look at the whole project -- to encourage them as part of that motion to get it done before the turtle season. MR. ROELLIG: I was looking at maybe getting the 50,000 started. We've got to do other contracting work. You've got contracts basically in place and negotiated to do the 50,000; is that correct? MR. HOVELL: Well, we have a proposal from the one company. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I'm saying -- if there's a majority -- to impress on the commission that after our discussions we believe even though the price might not be very attractive on that first 50,000, the need to hit some dunes and to hit Park Shore with that 50,000 means that we may have to spend a little more per unit in the short run. MR. HOVELL: Correct. MR. PIRES: I'm ready to second the motion. My understanding of the motion -- MR. KROESCHELL: I seconded it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Kroeschell has seconded it. MR. PIRES: The 50,000 from the upland source is focused on the dune restoration which has as a component of it the Park Shore aspect as well as the overall county dune restoration. MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. PIRES: Okay. MR. SNEDIKER: The dune restoration is over the entire county where needed. MR. HOVELL: Right. MR. ROELLIG: We're not specifying all the locations, right. MR. STRAPPONI: My understanding is it's about 30,000 cubic yards that we Page 31 December 6, 2001 1 2 need for the dune restoration, and the rest go to the Park Shore area. MR. ROELLIG: That's my understanding. MR. KROESCHELL: So 20,000 for Park Shore. MR. PIRES: When the Board of County Commission sees that on January 8th, they'll understand that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Some of that really needs to remain flexible. I think the point Mr. Roellig is making in this motion is to impress upon county commission that we believe the 50,000 cubic yards have to be placed as soon as possible. And if the unit cost is higher in this case than we've spent before or that we hope to spend in the future, the need for the fifty thousand -- whether it's thirty and twenty or whatever the mix is, we need to do it. MR. PIRES: Okay. That would be communicated, I guess, to the TDC for January 7th and to the BCC for the January 8th meeting? MR. ROELLIG: Why do we need to go back to them? MR. PIRES: I'm just looking at the memo from the county manager to Ron. It talks about the four points that they're looking for direction, I guess; is that correct? MR. ROELLIG: I don't think this needs to go back to the TDC, does it? MR. GRAY: I was thinking this is something that can be done post- haste. MR. PIRES: I just want to get clarification. The last paragraph of the memorandum talks about alternatives that will be reviewed for how to restore the beaches and includes, one, dune restoration prior to the next turtle season. There's four points. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, this is funded by TDC. The question is, will the county step up to pay them the higher unit costs. That's why we're trying to put on record what our feelings are. MR. HOVELL: Well, ultimately, if there's a project overrun, we would have to go back to the TDC as well. But as you point out -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We're just doing a tiny segment of the entire project. MR. HOVELL: Right. I guess the second point is -- you know, I figured we were going to do some trucking. All the options have some amount of trucking in them. I mean, it focuses on which way to do the trucking. It doesn't -- I guess what I was anticipating is, if we're going to change the whole 400,000 yards worth of trucking to potentially dredging or sand web or something other than trucking, I think that would probably need to go back through that. MR. PIRES: Okay. So that last paragraph of the memorandum -- MR. HOVELL: That's what I was looking at. MR. PIRES: -- doesn't really apply to this discussion? MR. HOVELL: Yeah. I mean, if we want to say, "Let's do what we can ASAP" -- whether that's through the city or a contractor -- and, I mean, "I think I'm going to do that in advance of January 8th" -- whereas, if you say, "Let's change to do -- you know, next winter or two winters from now let's do a dredge project to some degree," then I think Page 32 December 6, 2001 16J 2 that is something that both the TDC and the Board of County Commissioners would expect to hear because we're, in essence, changing the plan. Right now the plan is to do the 400,000 yards, I guess, by trucking only, but certainly as soon as possible. Whereas, if we change to dredging we're probably making a conscious decision to do it two years from now because of the rock - removal issue and permitting issues and whatnot. MR. GRAY: And inherent in this -- well, not inherent, but if this motion were to pass and if it were to be approved by the other bodies, this would take place, you think, by the end of January? We can get this done by the end of January? MR. HOVELL: I think that would be one of the questions, and I think the city is probably the major player in agreeing or disagreeing with the timing of when we do the work. I got the impression from City Council that, you know, they would like to snap their fingers, as all of us would, and start tomorrow, but I didn't hear them say, "Go ahead and work through tourist season to get it done." I think that's going to be something they're going to have to allow us to do, because there's obviously a lot of traffic. MR. GRAY: I would like personally to see that happen, you know, real quick right after it's approved and, hopefully, be done by the end of January. MR. SNEDIKER: Gary, what's the city's point of view on that? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We didn't take a formal position, at least not that I recall on that aspect of it, but the sense of the discussion I will say was that we would be willing to -- not just willing, but even encouraged to work through tourist season. Understand again, however, we have been working under the assumption that we have not just aesthetics at issue here from the width of the beach but some structural risks. That has been our working assumption. MR. SNEDIKER: Could Naples City Council give a motion or encouragement to the county to work through -- let the county know that you are willing to have them work through tourist season to get it done? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think we probably should take that action. MR. SNEDIKER: Yeah. Maybe instead of a formal action -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Even though it's a county project -- since the city borders so much of the beach and it would be a new break from the past precedence to do that, you would probably want some resolution or a letter from the mayor or something. MR. HOVELL: I don't remember the exact details, but I had written a letter to the city manager back when we thought we were going to start on December 1 st asking which beach accesses am I allowed to use, what times of the day, what days of the week, and I don't remember if I specifically asked if we could work into tourist season, but perhaps it was implied that we wouldn't be. Certainly now because of the late start date, I think that is something that -- whether it's the City Council or the city manager, I think somebody at Naples has to tell us -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I agree. My sense is we will. I guess we're also Page 33 December 6, 200116J 2 saying, "Let's get our ducks in a row." We spent a month with consternation over the pricing. Today's point is to encourage the commissioners to go forward on that 50,000 even with a higher unit price, as I understand it. MR. ROELLIG: I call for the question. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. We've had a member call for the question which we will do. As to Mr. Roellig's motion, all in favor. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It passes unanimously. MR. ROELLIG: I'd like to make another motion. I move that the county be encouraged as well to work on items with our new -- I'm not going to define this word -- but prepare a reconnaissance report on the estimated cost of doing dredging, using a sand source such as Fort Myers or Romano shoals, because I think it's important. That's the motion. I think it's important that -- MR. PIRES: I'll second the motion for discussion. MR. ROELLIG: Okay. Thank you. I think it's important that we get some specific numbers here so we know what we're comparing it against. We have a pretty good idea what the trucking is and so forth, but when you start talking about hopper dredges and rehandling and sand source searches and all that sort of thing, the numbers can get pretty substantial. I'm not sure that it would necessarily be a lot cheaper to do it that way, but I would like to find out. MR. GRAY: I agree. I think that what we just passed, the one that we just passed, takes care of our immediate needs. MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. GRAY: I think this group needs more input to be able to make a decision that's what I'm going to call longer range which would then also allow us to look at the Parker sand web project along with them. We might have more data than -- although that might be a little further down the road. MR. PIRES: I think that's what the Chairman, Gary, was indicating before. There's some other items that we need, I think, from the standpoint in order to make, I think, an articulate, good recommendation to the county commission with regard to ranking methodology and those kind of issues. There's a lot of information here, but I think there's a lot that we still need. Unfortunately, you're on a short fuse, it looks like, under this memo. I'm going back to that memo. MR. HOVELL: Believe me, every day I pull my hair out. MR. PIRES: Stop doing that, Ron. MR. HOVELL: Whatever kind of contract agreement, or whatever it's called, with the state to reimburse us for beach - related work includes as one of their line items that they agree that they will cost -share with us 50 percent to do a sand search, and they don't Page 34 December 6 2004 6 J 2 care if we don't use it until the year 2008 or next year. So I think perhaps in order to get that going, though, since it doesn't really fit into any particular project -- I don't know. I'm kind of talking out loud here. Maybe it does fit into this beach - recovery project if you take a second step and say, "Let's explore all the options including sand searches and potential dredging, and maybe I could do it under that project number and go and start that sand - search process and get the state to pay their 50 percent. Or I could write up a grant application, and we could review it on the 3rd of January and at the TDC on the 7th and the Board of County Commissioners on the 8th and have it be a separate project to go do a sand search. MR. ROELLIG: My view is I want to see what -- I'm going to assume that the sand is in these locations, and I want to see what the costs are we're looking at for hopper dredges. Hopper dredges are extremely expensive. There's a big mobilization cost, rehandling, and all of that sort of thing. I think we need to get sort of an order of magnitude and number of what we're talking about. MR. KROESCHELL: Well, you do it the way you feel, Ron. MR. ROELLIG: I think, you know, going for another -- that would be a separate step to go out and actually do the sand search. But I think, you know, it's kind of -- when I said "reconnaissance," I meant a simplified study to get sort of an order of magnitude of the actual dredging costs and rehandling costs. Because we're not looking at just one spot on the beach; we're looking over many miles, so there's a lot of variability in costs depending on where you put the sand. MR. SNEDIKER: With the same situation we have now. But with the quarter - million- dollar project we just finished last spring, we got some pretty good ideas of where sand travels there. MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. SNEDIKER: We don't want to duplicate any of that cost and time, so maybe the new engineers or whoever is involved could look at those or take those reports and study them very carefully to see what options we have to go to them and then come up with some cost figures as to how to get the sand out of the beach from there. MR. KROESCHELL: You do it the way you feel, but I would say this is a very integral part of the overall project and, therefore, you should go ahead with it under the current project of beach restoration. MR. HOVELL: I think in some preliminary discussions I've had with various folks, like engineers who may know something about dredging, I certainly had the impression that dredging is going to be less expensive than trucking. Now, to what degree -- is it half, or is it 75 percent, or even 80 or 90 percent? You know, like you said, it's going to depend on the specific location and where we want them -- which beaches exactly we want them to go to, but I certainly have to feel that it's less than trucking it. MR. ROELLIG: Well, that's fine. My feeling is there has been -- I'm not aware of any specific location, but I'm sure there's been some hopper dredging and projects of this Page 35 December 6, 200116J J 2 type somewhere in the Florida area or the Carolinas or something. So I'm not looking to spend a lot of money on -- I'm just trying to get some recent experience of what kind of order of magnitude we're talking about. MR. GRAY: I call for the question. MR. HOVELL: Did you happen to have a number? MR. HUMISTON: Yeah. In fact, Tom worked on the Captiva project, and we were working in the City of Sanibel and used the same dredge at the same time to put sand on the beach. I think Sanibel's overall cost was somewhere around $12 a yard. Do you know what Captiva was? MR. KEEHN: Yeah. Ours was ten or in that range. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Gray has called the question, so we'll take our vote. All in favor. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It passes unanimously 8 -0. MR. HOVELL: I'm sorry. Just so I know in advance of two weeks from now when the minutes come out, what exactly am I trying to do? Just come up with budgetary figures? MR. GRAY: A guesstimate of what it would cost for -- MR. HOVELL: Based on specific quantities and hopper dredging as opposed to a general guess without knowing quantities or the method; is that right? MR. GRAY: You can use their study, the Humiston, Moore study, as a resource and get these people involved to whatever extent you feel like you need to. MR. ROELLIG: Did they use a hopper dredge at Sanibel/Captiva? MR. KEEHN: Yes. MS. LUPO: I think earlier you also mentioned the difference between finding a place 10 or 15 miles offshore versus Rookery Bay on the south end and Lee County on the higher end, so I think that's another alternative. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Right. MR. SNEDIKER: It would be different. MR. GRAY: I know this is down the road, but I just want to say it for the record. Personally, if we can get the quality of sand that we know is out there and not go through this problem we had in 1996, I would personally like to see it dredged and brought in. I think it's cheaper. It's less invasive. You can work pretty much throughout the year, I think, doing that except maybe during the storm season in the summer. It gets a little tough then because of the storms. But I just think it's a much more efficient way to get it done. We just made a big mistake in 1996 with what we all know happened, and that doesn't necessarily mean that has to happen again. Page 36 December 6, 2001 16J 2 MR. HOVELL: Absolutely. I think other than turtle season, you know, I think it is less invasive. Certainly traffic isn't there. You only have to close the segment of beach that you're actually filling, you know, because you're not blocking traffic. You're not closing down Horizon Way. You don't have -- MR. GRAY: Interference, much less with traffic on the beach. MR. HOVELL: I tend to think so. MR. PIRES: Mr. Chairman, are there any other items you think you may have want to have staff sort of prepare more detailed analysis or review to help us in making the recommendations? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, this will take time. My own view is this will take time to evolve. We're going to need engineers with contracts to give us some advice. We don't want to duplicate work that's already been done or request funding that's already there. It will by necessity be a work in progress, I think. I think what we needed to accomplish today, and we did, is to emphasize the need for the short -term actions on the beach and then get the proper professional data and the proper staff study in which to make coherent decisions on the longer -term goals. MR. PIRES: I guess what I'm reading from this memo, though, is that you plan on having the county commission make some decisions on longer term sort of utilization or renourishment? That's why I keep going back to this January 8th memo. It seems to tie back into this, which goes out a couple of years it seems like. MR. HOVELL: Well, if we were going to change the long -term project then, yes, I think we need to go back through that process. I'm not sure how to say it other than to just be blunt. I think we've made a short -term decision, and I think what I'm hearing is we don't have enough information to make a long -term decision. MR. PIRES: Okay. MR. HOVELL: But, in essence, if we don't do it, you know, this go around, then we're not going to make January 8th, and it just continues to kick down the road. MR. PIRES: Why was the January 8th day a critical date? Any particular reason? MR. HOVELL: Only because the TDC only meets once a quarter, and January 7th is the TDC meeting. Beyond that it's not until April. MR. PIRES: But can they maybe have a special meeting because of the -- I think the sense you get from this whole committee is we need to have as much data as possible. I'm sure the TDC would wish to have that also. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We're not going to get done. What we're talking about is not for 2002. MR. PIRES: Right. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It might be the fall of 2002, but it's not for the spring, so it's a false emergency. It's better to have a good database in which to make a decision. MR. PIRES: Oh, I agree, but I get the sense that they want to make some Page 37 December 6, 200116J 2 decisions in January. MR. GRAY: No. MR. STRAPPONI: Mr. Chairman, four of these options make reference to approximately $350,000 for the search for sand. I assume that's sand offshore. MR. HOVELL: Uh -huh. MR. STRAPPONI: I have one question real quick, Ron. If we find it and where we find it and if it's of suitable quality, with the dynamics that exist out there, how long is it going to be there? If we locate suitable sand -- do you know what I'm asking? If we locate suitable sand and we say, "Well, it's reasonable to expect it to be there for the season, and then it's subject to move" -- is it pretty stable? MR. HOVELL: It's pretty stable. MR. STRAPPONI: Okay. My next question would be, if we're looking at four or five options here, and all but pure trucking involves searching for that sand, I would like to think that this body could make a decision today to just say, "Let's spend the $350,000 and find it, locate it, identify where it is, and then and only then we make some decision as to whether or not on a long -term basis we want to, you know, look at hydraulic restoration versus trucking. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We're starting to talk about it so much that we're doubling over and doubling up, but a 350,000- cubic -yard permit is for upland sand, isn't it? MR. STRAPPONI: I'm talking about $350,000. MR. GRAY: For the sand search? MR. STRAPPONI: For the sand search. So three hundred and fifty thousand dollars on an eight or nine million dollar decision, I think we should just go ahead and do it. MR. GRAY: I agree with you, but I think I would prefer to wait until the next meeting when these people are on board, No. 1, and you've been able to do your research, and then we'll see, "Do we really need to look further ?" And if we do, then let's make that decision at that time. MR. SNEDIKER: Don't we -- MR. STRAPPONI: What I'm saying is that we should be looking, you know, at whether we already have the information in place or we need to look further. We need to look before we can pass any judgment on hydraulic. MR. GRAY: Yeah, I agree. I think that is what's in the motion too. MR. SNEDIKER: Don't we have a lot of that information already? Maybe not 100 percent, but 85 percent out of the way? We spent a quarter million dollars last winter. MR. HOVELL: Yeah. I don't remember where that number came from. That may have been an old number before we did any work. You know, a lot of work had been done, and so that's just a number. It doesn't necessarily mean anything. I think, you Page 38 December 6, 2001 1 6 J 2 know, I'll talk to Roy and Tom Wides and Jim Mudd, and we'll figure out which way to go. I would tend to think that I'll probably end up doing a grant application for -- an out - of -cycle grant application for the current fiscal year, because the state's willing to cost - share it to do the full -blown sand search. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I'm going to suggest -- I think we've accomplished what we need to accomplish today. Let's take it up January 8th. We'll be taking it up February 6th. We'll be taking it up every month. This is what the committee does. This is what we'll be meeting about month after month. I think we have accomplished our needs. It's a big topic, an important topic, but we also have about eight or ten other items here. We'll move on now to 3 -C, which is the TDC category update. MR. ANDERSON: This is part of our regular monthly financial report, so we'll pass that out to you right now. There aren't any real significant changes. I think you'll see that the one major item is the Lake Trafford work. There was a transfer made there for that purpose. MR. GRAY: Is there some way we can get that with our packet next month? MR. HOVELL: Only if you want it a month old. Basically I have to do this, more or less, on the first Tuesday of each month, and this meeting is on the first Thursday of each month. So if I was to have sent you this packet a week and a half ago, it would have been the November packet, and it would be, you know, three or four weeks old. MR. GRAY: I think it's hard to comprehend. You know, there's a lot of data here. To make it meaningful for our meeting, I would almost rather have it a month old than be able to study it beforehand. MR. ANDERSON: Then we can tell you the updates at the meeting. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We can do it either way, because if there's something significant that -- Mr. Gray is right. Of course we can't absorb all of this in a minute or two, but you as staff would know if there's a significant departure or a significant event that occurred which required an expenditure, but this is really a budget update. These are summaries of what's already been authorized. So it's really more in the nature of an update which, I believe, is what it's called on our agenda. MR. HOVELL: It is, and as Roy pointed out and I think you did too, we know what the big changes were between last time and this time, and we'll summarize those for you as we hand these things out. But as far as getting them to you, I'll do it whichever way you prefer. The only change between the November 1 st report and the December 1 st report -- the only major change is that we did a budget amendment for the Lake Trafford restoration operation. There was a big ribbon- cutting ceremony and whatnot about two weeks ago. That project was approved by the TDC back in about 1998,1 think, or maybe '97, but because of the problem of not signing any kind of interagency agreement, somehow it got Page 39 December 6 2001 16J dropped out of the budget. So as we enter this year -- and they finally signed it in maybe late October, early November. It calls for up to $500,000 this fiscal year, a million next year, and $500,000 the year after. Since it wasn't in the budget, I had to do a budget amendment to come up with that $500,000. Since we had already taken everything there was to take out of the reserve, I had to pick a project. So I did pick a project. You'll find it in there someplace. MR. ROELLIG: Can you give us a clue? MR. HOVELL: Page 5 -- oh, no, that's Lake Trafford. MR. PIRES: Where did it go? MR. HOVELL: There it is. On page 2 a little more than halfway down, you'll see the minus $500,000 came out of the Marco Island Breakwater modifications. And since we weren't going to get to do the construction on that this year anyway, from executing that project point of view, it doesn't matter. Then as we build up reserves and whatnot, we'll just restore that project to its full amount. But I had to play that shell game. I can say now that I've been here a couple of months that I've reviewed all the old records, both TDC and various advisory committees and the Board of County Commissioners, and I think that's the only project that managed to fall through the cracks as far as being approved but not having a budget to back it up. So as long as we keep on that track, we shouldn't have that problem again. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Gray, on your point, if we lose a month in terms of the currency of the data by getting it in our packet -- I guess I suggest we do it this way: That we get it at the meeting, we hear a summary of highlights, and then we can review it at our leisure. After the meeting if we have questions -- this will be on the agenda every time. We can bring up questions at that point. MR. GRAY: That's fine. MR. HOVELL: You know, if you see something -- if you go home tonight and you read it and see something, you're certainly free to call me up and ask me in the interim. You know, you don't have to wait until the next meeting. MR. GRAY: Okay. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Item D -- MR. SNEDIKER: Could I ask a question? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Oh, yeah. Sorry. MR. SNEDIKER: Many of these items are engineering assignments. When does the county expect to have the engineers on board with these official assignments and have them beginning to work? Do we have any dates on that? MR. HOVELL: Well, anything that's specific work that requires engineering and ultimately project execution, I would like to think -- I picked out what those projects are and sort of penciled in assignments pending having signed contracts, and I'll ask for proposals to get on with doing it. But the ones that related to annual monitoring, if the monitoring isn't needed to be done until May or June, then I haven't worried about those Page 40 December 6, 2031 b J 2 yet. MR. SNEDIKER: Right. How about those that you need to do the proposals and so on? When do you expect to have those? MR. HOVELL: Things like the Marco Island Breakwaters and -- what else is in here that's specific? -- Hideaway Beach renourishment, Hideaway Beach access improvement; things that if we had somebody available to start working on it, they could start working on it as opposed to monitoring where we just get the paperwork lined up, but they wouldn't do it until May or June. Yeah. I think I pretty much pencilled all those things in, and I've been having conversations with the three firms. I've even been telling them to start thinking along these lines, but until I have signed contracts I'm not officially asking for proposals. MR. SNEDIKER: Let me further my question then. When do you expect to have signed contracts and the proposals and the proposals accepted and assigned to the engineers? Are we talking 30 days, 60 days, or -- I'm not trying to pinpoint you down, or maybe I am. MR. HOVELL: This is my first time with the county. I mean, this is -- I was with the federal government, and everything else in the federal government took a lot longer. This is the part about the county that takes longer than the federal government. In the federal government, they delegate the authority to a contracting officer, and when you get the right kind of proposal in, you can sit down and sign it back to them, and you're done. In the county I have to get the Board of County Commissioners to sign it. For some reason, even though they approved these contracts on November 13th, I still don't have signed contracts. I'm told every time I call "any day," but here it is December 6th, and I don't have signed contracts. I've been told, you know, other people have had experiences where it typically takes about a month to end up with a signed contract. MR. SNEDIKER: Then you go to the individual engineering firms -- basically the three you selected -- to have proposals on individual projects? MR. HOVELL: Right. MR. SNEDIKER: Then roughly how long after you get a contract would you expect the proposal back and you award the proposal -- the contract -- the job assignment for the proposal? MR. HOVELL: I don't know. That usually takes a week or two or three depending on if there's any questions and whatnot. That's why I try to give them a heads - up of what's coming, so hopefully we can talk about some of those issues a little bit. So with the holidays coming up, I mean, it might be the first or second week of January but, you know, fairly soon. MR. SNEDIKER: Thank you. (Mr. Anderson left.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any other questions on the TDC report? Okay. Now, rock - removal plan, Item 3 -D. That's going to be the status of the December 6, 20011 A J 2 consent order and so forth. MR. HOVELL: Yeah. I just put it on there because I know it's a hot topic, you know, to remind me to provide any updates. I still have not gotten any feedback from the state. The only thing I can add is that -- Roy had to leave, but he apparently went to school with and/or knows the ombudsman for the Florida DEP who helps, you know, resolve conflicts. So he called him and asked him to help stir the pot on getting some things broken free. I don't know if it's as a result of that or what, but the first sign I've seen that they've actually given any thought to our plan was that I was asked to present them an electronic copy so that they could just make the changes that they would like to see done and hand it back to us as a draft type of thing. So maybe in the next week or two I'll get something out of that. Beyond that, I think the other issue that came up at Monday morning's workshop, which might be where -- both you and I are trying to get back to those various folks that it was said in front of, but, you know, it's been my impression that unless you're specifically authorized to do something, you don't have the authority to do it. So when we were discussing whether or not we could go out into the surf and pick up rocks, I was using the normal project procedures and saying, "Well, no, you have to describe what you're going to do even under an existing permit and go get a notice to proceed from the state." I've been trying to research that because Mr. Boggess takes exception with that interpretation, and most of the people that I've talked to tend to agree with him that, in fact, since we've been ordered to remove rocks and the rocks are there or were placed there under the existing permit or under an existing project -- it seems that the project is held an open status and that we may, in fact, be able to just go get rocks anytime we want and pretty much do it any way we want as long as it's within the boundaries of the permit, i.e., not during turtle season and, you know, watching out for water - quality standards such as turbidity and whatnot. But it's interesting that even people at DEP have given me different answers depending on which section I've spoken to, so I'm trying to finish that discussion. But the end result may be that we don't really have to go get specific authority to do any type of rock removal. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That would be the hand picking of rocks? MR. HOVELL: Well, it could be hand picking or even with machinery. As long as it's within all the various permit conditions, I don't think it requires a separate notice to proceed. They're just expecting that we're going to do it. But the consent order kind of complicates that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: But the consent order, you know, until that's finalized, you don't have a truly final resolution on the size limitation and a sample on that, do we? Page 42 December 6 20011 6 J MR. HOVELL: Well, the consent order is final. It's just the rock - removal plan that's not final. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. MR. HOVELL: I got the impression when they called me the other day and asked me to send that to them electronically that their vision of how this was going to work from here on out is that they'll either approve the rock - removal plan in its entirety, or -- and we talked about it a little -- what they may very well do is approve the first phase, which was more of the "go find where the rocks are" and then require us to turn in plans and specifications to execute it. Then they would approve those plans and specifications before we could go do that part. I guess the main thing I wanted to point out about the whole rock - removal issue is, I tend to doubt we'll be doing much of anything this winter. It will probably be starting in November. I'm hoping -- you know, if things go well, we might do the sampling side of things and maybe find where the rocks are, but we certainly won't get a chance to remove the rocks until next winter. MR. STRAPPONI: How can we replenish without removing rocks? MR. HOVELL: That's exactly my point. We can't. That's why even though -- all other things being equal except for that issue, I would have said, "Oh, yeah, clearly, let's truck what we can this winter, and let's dredge next winter." But if you bring in big equipment like that, they want to do everything. Well, we can't do everything because we have this rock issue. So maybe the answer is truck enough to do the storm protection, do the rock removal next winter, and plan on doing the dredging the winter after that. MR. STRAPPONI: That's what I see. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: As long as we can stipulate -- it's already way delayed from what we had hoped. MR. GRAY: Either that or put an ad in the paper and ask everyone in the city or in Collier County to go down and get one rock and take it home. MR. ROELLIG: Put a bounty on it. MR. STRAPPONI: A rock bounty. MR. ROELLIG: Don't put that on there. THE COURT REPORTER: It's too late. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Do we have any other questions on rock removal? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Very good. Please keep us updated, obviously, and let's hope, like so many things, this doesn't move from season to season. Item 3 -E, Tigertail Beach and Sand Dollar Island. Mr. Snediker, I know that you had attended a meeting on that, and you're going to report on it. MR. SNEDIKER: Yes. Let me draw a little picture up here if I may. I'll pass these photographs around too. I was planning to do this in the other room where we have more room. Let me just sort of draw it out a little bit here. Page 43 December 6, 2001 b J 2 What we have up here -- this is what was Sand Dollar Island. It used to be purely an island. It used to be what is now called a lagoon. There's a tremendous amount of wash rushing through there; actually, a very strong current to the extent that there have been a number of drownings in that area. This is basically the parking area which includes a bathroom facility and a brand - new concession stand that is being built at Tigertail now. This is basically the area here that most people use as the beach. The lagoon itself now is -- the area here closed off now a number of years ago, and as it gets up to the north end -- this being the north end and this being the south end -- the north end at low tide is basically closed off now. So we have a closed -in lagoon. Whereas it used to have a flushing action keeping it a very nice beach, that is now a reasonably stagnant area. It's been filling in as the sand drifts south. The lagoon itself you can walk across here. It's about waist deep. When we have our meeting out there -- I think we're planning on meeting out there about a month from now at our January meeting. We will be out there about at average tide, about 1.2 on that day according to the calculations I can see, and you'll probably be seeing people walking across there. It used to be a very nice beach. It's closing in now. If you go up the -- where are those pictures? Are they around? Thanks. Those two pictures were taken right about here looking north. One is looking right up along the island and the other looking towards -- overlooking the lagoon towards the main area of the beach parking itself. As one walks up from the main part of Marco Island and walks up along here, you would never know you're on an island. Nobody ever knows when they go to this area. Although there is a trash can here, there is the limit of where people are allowed to go as far as vehicles are concerned. The island itself goes out just about two miles of beautiful, beautiful beach. It's just a gorgeous beach out there except right now people -- if you come in here and you park your car there, you've got your cooler, you've got your children, you've got your chairs or your blanket or something, then you have to walk all the way down here and get out to here which is very a long walk. There is over a quarter -of -a -mile walk here. So by the time you get out there with everything, it's very difficult to do it. Let me take another color. This area here has a lot of vegetation. I'll call it weeds or vegetation as such. At lot of it is roped off. This is basically a critical wildlife habitat -- if I'm using the right words here. This area here -- a lot of it is roped off for nesting birds, etc. The idea is to see that people can get from here over to the other side of the beach. What is thought of and was proposed by some people is to put a bridge over here going from here across the lagoon, across the area that is the wildlife area, and maybe a couple lookout areas or something of that nature on it. This apparently -- this meeting that was had on November 8, which was attended by Ron and Al, his beach inspector. December 6 20011 6 2 Marla Ramsey, who is our director of parks and recreation, was there with our beach superintendent and two of their rangers. The Conservancy was there. Ron was able to bring Phil Flood from the state DEP there from Tallahassee. We were very happy to have him there. The idea is that we're trying to get some communication going. I guess we're having a hard time between parks and recreation and Phil Flood. I guess Phil Flood is not answering phone calls or something like that. We're trying to get this done. This would not affect us at all. It not be involved in our -- it would be involving TDC funds, but not the Coastal Advisory Committee building this bridge. The only thing we can really do to enhance this, as we'll see when we get out there -- this beach area here is very hard, a hard -panned area there, but I guess from what I'm told from Al Madsen we cannot do anything about that. MR. MADSEN: I know we cannot till the beach or anything because it is a source of food for the wildlife. MR. SNEDIKER: Parks and recreation would like to have that done to have a much nicer beach for the beach - goers, but that cannot be done. So, basically, there's nothing we can do, but we will see this beach next month. If this bridge can go across, this whole park area would become much better for the beach - goers. Right now it's the county's most popular park that we have. So things are very important that keep the -- we assist in our area to keep this as a very good beach. MR. MADSEN: Mr. Snediker, as a point of information, we can do anything we choose to the mean -high water line. The mud flaps -- the dark area that is below mean - high water is where we cannot do any work. We continually clean the beach in the high areas or above the mean -high water. We maintain that on a regular basis. But in the dark mud, flat hard areas, we're not allowed to go into that area. MR. SNEDIKER: That's a very, very shallow slope. It's about a 30 -to -1 slope or something going on out there. I'm not exactly sure where the mean -high water line comes in. Another problem that currently is somewhat solvable right now is -- for example, Al mentioned our beach inspector cannot take his vehicle and drive out -- give or take the two miles out. It's a mile and a half or two miles. He can't drive out there. The city police cannot go out there. Apparently the sheriff has gone out there, and he says he's going to go out there when he wants to. In an emergency case, they can go out there. Trash cans cannot be put out there. Now, apparently there is a permit that can be obtained -- Nancy Richie from the City of Marco Island tells me -- from the DEP to allow Al to go out there. I thought Al ought to be able to go out there and inspect that beach just like he inspects any other beach. I would also like to see trash cans put out there and trash cans removed. Again, that's a parks and recreation project, not our project. Right now the rangers cannot go out there unless they walk the entire area. O December 6, 2001 1 2 MR. ROELLIG: How long would the bridge be? MR. SNEDIKER: Just about a thousand feet the way I measured it. Any questions at all? We'll see you -all next week. Actually, we will be right here when you look out there. MR. KROESCHELL: The lagoon is completely closed at the south end, and the north end is open at high tide; is that right? MR. SNEDIKER: Well, it's closed at low tide. You get a little bit for low tide, maybe half of a foot or something, and then it starts opening again. You get a trickle of water where it used to be just, you know, flow right through there. MR. ROELLIG: Wading at high tide more or less? I mean, you can wade in it at high tide? MR. SNEDIKER: You can walk across it. At high tide, yes, you can walk across it, but the lagoon is getting kind of dirty. There's a lot of birds around there, and it gets kind of smelly and stagnant in there. Now, there have been people who thought about the idea of filling in the lagoon. That would never happen. There's too much of a critical wildlife area. People who are thinking about that, you know, should not waste their time doing that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: How permanent -- can anyone advise on how permanent that is? It hasn't been there all the time. It seems like it might be a transient condition. MR. HOVELL: One of the things I have found -- actually, one of the first things I found in the files when I got here was an article about Little Estero Island just off of Fort Myers. It has a very similar history to this one. And since then I've also found some of the reports. Maura Kraus has been telling me that we had this same condition in 1989 or 1990. You know, once again, that finger became part of the beach, and the next wave of sand coming in got named Sand Dollar Island. I mean, over the long term, maybe 10, 15, 20 years, it's a repetitious cycle down there. I'm not even so sure that maybe the whole idea of a boardwalk wasn't brought up 10 or 15 years ago as an idea of what to do back then too. Maura is shaking her head yes. In looking at the records, that's just the way that part of Marco Island has historically formed, and I imagine it's always going to continue. So, you know, I think the folks that were there that remember some of those long term -- "there" being at that meeting that day when we were standing there talking about it, you know, tended to say that this might be very transient boardwork. It might only be there 5 or 10 years, and then depending on how thing change, we'll maybe have to rip it up and/or relocate it or reorient it or whatever. But in the meantime, I mean, I think the main point is that's one of the few public county parks for beach access, and yet when you get out to what you would think of as the beach, what you're really staring at is a very hard - packed brown slimy, slippery -- you Page 46 December 6, 200116J 2 can slip and fall down very easily -- mud flap, and it's just becoming less and less of an enjoyable place to go. MR. SNEDIKER: I've got an aerial photograph going back to 1940 and 1952, and the area does move. With one big hurricane, you know, who knows what would happen. It could be drastically different. DR. STAIGER: If you had a storm event of reasonable magnitude from the right direction, what you do is overwash the sand, and it fills into the lagoon. Well, eventually if you got either a big storm or a succession of lesser storms, the lagoon basically gets totally filled in. What Ron just alluded to is the next sandbar comes ashore and becomes Sand Dollar Island, the next iteration, and starts the whole process again. It might be -- something to look at would be to figure out, based on some of these historical aerials, where a logical location for a boardwalk -type structure might be. You put the damn thing in there, and it functions for a period of time, and then the boardwalk is basically going over dry land for a period of time, and then maybe 15 years from now the boardwalk starts to function again. Of course, boardwalks don't last that long unless you make it out of something that's highly resistant to rot. That was an idea that was tossed around with the previous beach committee. It was how do you get people out there without filling the lagoon in, which is -- you'll never get a permit for it. But the other concern is, if you access the critical wildlife area, maybe it's too easy to get to. Then you've got the concerns of the Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission, the fish and wildlife services, as to how you keep people from disturbing the birds and everything that make that a reason for the critical wildlife area. MS. HORTON: I'm sure all of the emerged lands there is critical wildlife area, not just the roped off part, but pretty much the whole island or peninsula, as you call it, is a critical wildlife area. So any kind of boardwalk has to not only be, I guess, approved by the DEP, but you would have to consult the Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission because they have jurisdiction over that area as well. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Could you state your name, please, and affiliation. MS. HORTON: Nori Horton for The Conservancy of Southwest Florida. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. MR. KROESCHELL: Mr. Snediker reminded us that at one time there were wild currents going there, and several people drowned. The bridge would alleviate that problem. MR. SNEDIKER: Well, it would be difficult to drown out there now because it's not very deep. There's no current at all. MR. KROESCHELL: If it came about again where we had the currents again, then the people would not have to get across that area, and they could walk, so that would alleviate that problem because that was the time that there was a discussion of filling it in because there were people drowning. MR. SNEDIKER: Yes. I think we'll see a great deal next month. Page 47 December 6, 2001 16 J :-) MR. GRAY: I think that's the next step. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I would agree. Mr. Hovell, do you have anything to add to that? MR. HOVELL: No. Thank you. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Great. Thank you, Mr. Snediker. THE COURT REPORTER: Mr. Chairman, can we take five minutes? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Yes. I was just going to suggest it. We've done five, including our hugest item, and we have five left. Why don't we take five minutes. Let's try to keep it short so we are not here into people's dinner hour. We'll be back in five minutes. (A short break was held from 4:01 p.m. To 4:09 p.m.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I just want to note for the record that during our short break Miss Lupo had to leave. Mr. Pires is still with us, but not in attendance this minute. We'll go now to Item 3 -F which is an update on the Wiggins Pass project. MS. HORTON: Could I ask one more question about patrolling off Sand Dollar Island? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Yes, certainly. MS. HORTON: I just didn't know -- could you clarify the reason for the need for someone to patrol out there in a truck? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I'm not sure that we established the need. Mr. Roellig or Al. MR. MADSEN: I don't -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Pardon me. Mr. Snediker. MR. SNEDIKER: There were two reasons that I would think. One, our beach inspector patrols all the other county -- all the beaches within the county that we -- no, he doesn't? MR. HOVELL: I'm sorry to interrupt, but, no, we only patrol the beaches that we maintain. Since we don't maintain Sand Dollar Island, we wouldn't have any typical reasons to patrol it. MR. SNEDIKER: Okay. I guess -- from Al's point of view, I guess we don't need to then. From the county -- and I'll let the county parks and recreation speak for themselves, but if they're going to need more people out there, they may want to have their rangers out there patrolling from -- call it an overall safety point of view, but I'll let parks and recreation speak for themselves on that. MS. HORTON: Since it is state land, I wanted to reiterate that not only would you have to get a permit from DEP, but you would have to consult with the Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservation Commission. I think the regional biologist is -- what's his last? His name is Zembrano (phonetic), and he's in West Palm Beach, but I recommend you consult with him. MR. SNEDIKER: Well, that would be park and recreation to do that, not our Page 48 operation. 1 December 6, 20 MS. HORTON: Okay. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you for that clarification. MR. SNEDIKER: They're the ones that would like to have more influence, shall we say, and keep the beach nicer. The biggest thing is trash cans out there. There's a lot of Coke cans and beer cans and plastic bags around that people don't want to carry back. If there's trash cans out there, then they have to have some means of picking up the trash or cleaning out the trash cans periodically. That would be part of their paroling. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. Okay. Now we move on to Item 3 -F, the Wiggins Pass dredging update. MR. HOVELL: Very briefly, the plans and specifications are out for bid. I believe they're due about the 19th of December. So I would anticipate taking that to the board on the 8th of January and having a contract maybe by, you know, the first of February. So I would anticipate that late February, early March we'll be out dredging Wiggins Pass. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any questions? Okay. Update on Clam Pass. MR. HOVELL: That one was or still is a Pelican Bay services division project, but we're paying close attention because it, in essence, will restore the dunes on Clam Pass Park. The contract has been awarded. The pre - construction meeting is scheduled for Monday the 10th, this coming Monday, and I believe the contractor intends to start immediately thereafter, maybe Tuesday or Wednesday. So we ought to see somebody out there dredging. As I recall, the quantities anticipated to be pulled out happen to more or less match up with exactly what we need to restore all the dunes pretty much the entire length of the park, so it works out pretty well. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: What is the anticipated time frame, not starting, but the length of the project? MR. HOVELL: I think they've estimated that unless there's some bad weather, it will only take them about two to three weeks. MR. KROESCHELL: I have a question. There was a meeting, and I wonder if anybody -- the whole thing was about the mangroves and everything about a week or so ago, and I wonder if anybody in this group attended. MR. ROELLIG: I happen to be chairman of that subcommittee. MR. KROESCHELL: Oh, you are? Okay. MR. ROELLIG: To make a short comment on the Clam Pass dredging, I was out there two or three days ago, and they were out doing surveying already. So it looks like they're ready to -- you know, I didn't see any equipment in the vicinity, but they're doing surveying, so that's ready to go. I'll give you a very short update on the mangroves. We've spent a lot of money, and the short answer is that we believe we've stopped the decline. We've had some areas Page 49 December 6, 2001 that we were starting to get some rejuvenation. (Mr. Pires entered the room.) MR. ROELLIG: We have very much increased the effectiveness of the hydraulic tidal flushing. We've dug some canals back into the stressed mangroves, and they're getting sea water back in there, and we're hopeful that we've turned the corner a little bit going into more of a maintenance situation there. The main reason I'm sort of hopeful is because when Gabrielle came through, the whole area was kind of overwashed, and all the mangroves -- the whole area got initially about two feet of water. Within about 24 to 36 hours, that water drained out of the system. Prior to that, a couple of years ago, we would get a heavy rain, and water would stand there for long periods of time, and it seemed to kill off the mangroves. So I'm optimistic that we're making some progress now. We've gone through -- we had a lot of revegetation. We've had some mangroves start growing. We have kind of a ground cover called betus (phonetic) that's growing up in the area. The problem in the past -- years ago when that happened, the summer rains would come, and water would stand there and, of course, it would get very hot and kill everything off. We've gone through the whole summer now, and there has been no significant dying off of what was there when the rainy season started. We have some optimism that the mangrove situation is at least -- what's a good word? It's stabilized. We've had some additional die -off, but we've had some rejuvenation, and we think we're on the road to more rejuvenation. MR. KROESCHELL: At the meeting we had up there two meetings ago, the representative from Pelican Bay said that they really weren't encouraging the dredging of Clam Pass because Gabrielle had kept it open, but we're going to do it anyhow. So that's got to help things rather than hinder. MR. ROELLIG: It will help somewhat. Basically Gabrielle was a -- by doing the channel workup in the mangrove area, as I said, it drained out in 24 to 36 hours, so the cross - section of Clam Pass as it comes into the Gulf of Mexico was basically flushed out to where it had been dredged before the cross - sectional area. What you're looking at now is we're going to get some sand out of there, and we're going to do some additional dredging a little bit further up where there is beach - quality material. This will help to keep a good flow of tidal water in there. While I don't think it's going to make a great difference as far as tidal flow, it is beneficial to use that beach - quality material for the Clam Pass Park. It's something -- it's the kind of maintenance that would have to be done over a period of time because when you have a tidal situation like that, every time the tide comes in, it flows in, but it drops some sand back in a ways, and then when it goes out, it goes offshore. So eventually it does need to be cleaned out. We normally wouldn't have cleaned. We might have done it a couple of years ago, but it's just an advance maintenance thing to provide beach material for Clam Pass Park. Page 50 December 6, 2001 16J 2 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Very good. Are there any other questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. We move on to new business, Item 4 -A, the ten -year plan development. Mr. Hovell, I think you're going to brief us today on what -- this is one of our annual duties. This is a new committee in the process, and it's the timing it will undertake over the next several months. MR. HOVELL: Yeah. The gist of this is I just wanted to open the discussions on - - well, actually, if you look at one of your handouts, it's the first two pages of the ordinance that created the committee. If you breeze through it, either now or later on, you'll find that one of the main purposes of this committee -- some of you have asked that at various meetings -- is how does this affect the ten -year plan. That's because this committee's main charter is to have a ten -year plan. I've also handed out to you a three -page handout, lots of spreadsheet - looking things. Not to go over them now, but just to give you an idea, the front page is the ten - year plan from about a year ago. All the budget numbers were developed by Coastal Engineering Consultants, so I think that's going to be one of the issues; do we go to the three new consultants and ask them for budget predictions and whatnot? The following two pages are, in essence, a initial attempt just to update the old plan with some current information and some formatting changes. Again, just to share some thought on how we would like to approach this in the future, one of the things that we'll have to flush into the bottom of this will be what do we really think the revenue is going to be this year because of the decline in tourism, how are we going to account for the revenues that we previously never had to consider, and that's the third handout. There's a contract with the state to cost -share a number of these projects as well as the FEMA reimbursement. So, anyway, the bottom line is, we're going to need a ten -year plan to submit to the state for continuing to keep our fingers in the pot for future projects by the end of March. I would like to suggest that perhaps -- since there's so many details on something like this, that perhaps just trying to do it at the next two meetings between January and February really isn't going to cover it to the degree that it probably needs to be covered -- so maybe having a special workshop just to work on the ten -year in late January, middle of February, or something like that might be the way to approach it. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think that might be valuable. Also, in addition to the additional time, we might need to have a day in which that's the one topic we have to address instead of having 6 or 8 or 10 different things on our agenda. So this is just done for our review at this stage. This is what we review when we're a new committee and also have new staff. We didn't really generate it last year. It was the beach renourishment committee's work, but now we have our turn to do it our way. DR. STAIGER: The state in their previous request for this annual update of this plan have looked at, I think, the first four or five years of it as the annual presentation, Page 51 December 6, 2001 16J and then the last five or so as just one lump. Now, they may be looking now at more details. They're in this dilemma with $30 million a year to go to beach management, and they're very concerned that if they don't have projects for that money, if they don't spend it appropriately in a reasonable period of time, the legislature is going to take it back because the legislature is always looking for a source of funds. This is a big pot. One of the problems -- and, hopefully, this new regime in Tallahassee is going to help it -- is there are projects out there, and our consultants are very well aware of it -- the projects are designed. It's getting the damn permits is what takes forever, and that's DEP itself. So they're sort of part of the problem. But it's important that this be done accurately and timely so the state knows what we need because they've got the money to give it to local government if we get our ducks in a row, so to speak. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Very good. At this stage it's more or less informational, but does anyone have any questions at this point? MR. PIRES: Just one quick question, Dr. Staiger, on that issue. With regard to how the state allocates to the county once you do your plan and your program, compliance with prior consent orders and your track record on that, does that factor into their determination as to how many dollars to give a particular county? DR. STAIGER: I don't think so. They've been arguing internally in the permitting end of DEP for awhile over, you know, if they're going to penalize people who have consistently been flagrant violators of permit conditions about, you know, new permits and that sort of thing. They haven't dealt with that on the beach end. It's been more in wetlands, filling, and that kind of stuff. MR. PIRES: Okay. Thanks. DR. STAIGER: I don't think they're going there because every time they do the attorneys go ballistic. MR. PIRES: Thank you. MR. HOVELL: The only other thing I wanted to specifically point out was, as you'll see on the front of that first spreadsheet in the FY02 column down at the bottom under tourist tax, it shows, you know, the 1 cent tax and 50 percent of the 2 cent tax both being $3,220,000. So, in essence, $6.4 million is what we originally budgeted for revenues this year. On the 27th of November, I guess it's the office of management and budget who turned in an executive summary, you know, sort of with a worst -case scenario and lowered that in the worst case to $4.4 million instead of $6.4 million. So they're basically taking a third of the revenue away from projections. The impact was that they specifically called out the Vanderbilt Beach parking garage project for budget deferral. So it's not really an impact to the beach program, but it's something to be aware of. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. Anything else from the members of the committee on that? Page 52 December 6, 2001 6 J 2 (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Next on the list of new business is Item 4 -B, the TDC grant application annual cycle. MR. HOVELL: I just wanted to give the committee a heads -up that historically the Tourist Development Council had reviewed grant applications at their April meeting, and that seems to fit fairly well with the county's budget cycle and whatnot. Therefore, I would anticipate that, you know, January and February would be the project development months. Then by maybe the February and March meetings I would expect to be having you review the grant applications so that we can pack them together and give them to the Tourist Development Council in early April. Then they would go to the Board of County Commissioners in late April or early May. So that would be for the projects listed as FY03. So that's another reason why we need to have a ten -year plan kind of fairly far along by the end of March. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So we really have our work cut out for us in January, February, and March. MR. HOVELL: Yes. MR. GRAY: Should we be -- should this group be thinking about things that we might specifically want to do to get into their basket now? MR. HOVELL: If you already have something in mind or think you might have something in mind, I would ask you to look at the ten -year plan and see if you think it's in there or ask me if it's in there some place. Because the sooner we can get somebody started on developing the grant application, the better off we are. I mean, I don't want to wait until March 15th and find out, oops, somebody's pet project isn't in there for consideration. MR. GRAY: Is there anything that we should be thinking about? I'm just now starting to think about it myself, I guess. Maybe at the January meeting if any of us have anything that we think needs to be done that isn't covered, maybe we should bring that back to the January meeting. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think that's a good suggestion. MR. HOVELL: I would also like to point out that, you know, I don't know how other people in the past have done things. I would almost hazard a guess that for the most part the block of projects has kind of been -- I hate to say rubber stamped -- but for the most part, it seems like most of them just kind of go through the process, and there's not, like, a whole range of things to pick from, and some are picked and others are not. But for those things that have come up that perhaps I or staff might not think are appropriate for TDC funds, I've still encouraged them to submit a grant application and go through the formal process and let the Board of County Commissioners tell them whether it's an appropriate project or not. So you'll see things that will probably have a negative recommendation, from at least me, but it will still be reviewed. Those will include some interesting canal projects. I called for improvements to the Goodland Canal Page 53 December 6, 2001 16J 2 and, you know, other things that fit that category. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Any other questions or comments? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Item 4 -C, we had in our packet a letter from the Florida Shore & Beach Preservation Association. They're asking for Collier County to -- is it to be a member or renew its membership? DR. STAIGER: To be a member. MR. HOVELL: To be a member, I guess. I think perhaps maybe some number of years ago Collier County may have been a member for one or two years, but my impression is we've never really been a long -term member. You know, if you flip to the last page, the $5,000 invoice is kind of what made me think it isn't something that staff should just choose internally. It's not an insignificant amount of money. I don't know if -- Jon being the chair, I believe, might want to tell you a little bit more than I could ever do about what value there might be to Collier County for being a member. I don't know how many of you took the time to read the whole thing and if you have any questions, but certainly Jon as the chairman could address it. MR. KROESCHELL: Is the city a member then? DR. STAIGER: Yeah. The City of Naples has been a member for a long time. I've been a member personally for about 15 years. The city -- I think we got involved maybe eight or ten years ago. The membership fee has graduated depending on the size of the organization. I think Metro Dade may pay significantly more than Collier does. I don't remember for sure. At any rate, in a nutshell it is a league of cities and counties that are coastal that function to protect the beach interests in Tallahassee and with the Corps of Engineers in Washington. They have a separate lobbying effort called Beachwatch, which is another thing that you can join, that involves major funding projects in Tallahassee and in Washington. It's a worthwhile thing. Collier County has not been a member, and I encourage the county to be a member. A lot of organizations have joined when they were pursuing the beach restoration project. Once they got the project completed, they sort of let their membership lapse. But with the ongoing beach management programs here, I think it's a worthy thing for the county to be a member of. It is a significant amount of money, so it's not just something that Ron can approve a purchase order for. MR. GRAY: Jon, I have a question. Has the City of Naples paid the annual dues in the past? DR. STAIGER: Yes. MR. GRAY: Are they still paying it? DR. STAIGER: Yes. MR. GRAY: Would this be in lieu of or in addition to? Page 54 December 6, 200 1. A J 2 DR. STAIGER: No. This would be in addition to. The City of Naples is a member. Collier County, you know, we feel ought to be a member as well. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Is the City of Marco Island a member? DR. STAIGER: I don't think so at this point. MR. PIRES: Ron, does Collier County have a contract that lobbies for $50,000 a year or something like that for county interests? MR. HOVELL: I'm really not sure. MR. PIRES: I think the Board of County Commissioners has a separate contract for the lobbyists for county issues. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: They do. I'm not sure if it's signed yet. I think it might be, but they certainly have a contract. MR. PIRES: This can dovetail with that so they make sure they're not working on cross purposes. MR. HOVELL: From what little I know about it, you know, besides being a professional organization, if you will, I would probably wind up attending a lot of their annual meetings anyway just because the items are of interest. But from trying to listen to what people have said both here and when I've been to the conference and whatnot, I think the main focus perhaps a number of years ago included lobbying both Washington for the federal projects, which we don't have any, but also at the state level. It used to be the legislature that specifically approved projects for the various counties and cities. As you know, Collier County never really got any state money. Now, the program as of '96 shifted to where the legislature isn't the one who specifically approves the project. The state has been a little more willing to make sure the wealth gets spread around. But I think there's still kind of a perception, if you will -- if you look at the list of ex officio directors or whatever, they've got some DEP representation on the committee, and I don't know if being a member helps or not in getting additional state funds. Tom Campbell is also listed on there. MR. CAMPBELL: Yeah. I'm one of the ex officio members of the organization. About two years ago the organization was legislatively included in a review of the projects and ranking of the projects, so SFBPA, as a committee, has advised the state on which projects are in and not in. So they're very active. They keep bad legislation out of the program which would kill funding or create insurmountable environmental obstacles having to do with the program. So it's a very good organization if you have an active beach program, which you do. So I would encourage you to join and be an active member of the organization, because they really are the leader in the state and somewhat on a national level now in beach issues. Where it dovetails with your own lobbying actions is your lobbyists in Tallahassee probably follow many, many issues. If you're a member of this organization, he has direct access to SFBPA and their lobbyist, Debbie Flagg, to see how the issues would affect your county and be able to work in concert with that lobbying effort. So I Page 55 December 6, 2001 6 think, you know, from that perspective, a lot of the counties and cities have found it very beneficial. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Is there also an informational component or kind of a professional association component to this, or is it strictly lobbying? DR. STAIGER: No. They have -- the membership is primarily government people involved in beach programs and the coastal engineering community, and there's a lot of information transfer. I mean, the technical conference that they have every winter is highly detailed. I think David has been to a number of them. I go to all of them. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And that would go beyond pending legislation and into some of the areas of technical competence and so forth? MR. HOVELL: Yeah. The thing that the organization did, which was a major effort for a long time, was to find this source of funds for a dedicated beach management program. The state legislature created the Florida beach management program in the early '80s, and it wasn't until '95 or '96 or so that they came up with a funding source for it. Now that the funding source is there -- it was $10 million the first year, $20 million the second, and $30 million the third. Now it's 30 million a year for the beaches. It's to protect that money, and now that it's there we're getting some of it. We've got a grant right now for three hundred and some thousand dollars from the state out of that sum of money to do the work we need to do on the Gordon Pass jetty. The county has grants for state support. So part of it now is that since they came up with that dedicated funding source and we are now eligible for that and we can get the money, the more participation that the city and the county have in it I think the better chance we have of continuing to get state funding support. They wanted to spend that money on good projects, and they're looking for places to put it, or the legislature will take it back. MR. GRAY: I would move that we join the organization. MR. ROELLIG: I'll second that. MR. STRAPPONI: Second. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. We'll give that to Mr. Roellig. He got it in first. Motion itself was by Mr. Gray. I suppose our motion would be to advise the commissioners that we would support joining the organization for the benefits outlined in this conversation. MR. ROELLIG: What would the source of funds be for the $5,000? DR. STAIGER: It's a trust fund -- I'm sorry. MR. ROELLIG: For the county? MR. SNEDIKER: Project management or something. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It would probably be out of the general fund, so it isn't really part of our mandate. Since it would assist the staff, we need it to rely on in order to do our thing, I would just encourage them to allow them to join or have the county join. MR. HOVELL: They may very well -- somebody might say that it should come Page 56 December 6, 20011 J 6 z out of Fund 195, the beach fund. I don't know. I would have to ask. MR. GRAY: With a budget as big as ours, I think we can find $5,000. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We have a motion, and we have a second. All in favor? MR. STRAPPONI: Aye. MR. GRAY: Aye. MR. KROESCHELL: Aye. MR. ROELLIG: Aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Aye. MR. SNEDIKER: Aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? MR. PIRES: Aye. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Pires. It passes 6 -1 if I'm doing my counting right. Mr. Pires descended. MR. PIRES: I'll talk to Burt. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That ends our new business. We do have a provision for audience participation. If anyone in the audience would like to comment on something we may not have covered today, now is your time. (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Not seeing any volunteers, let's talk about our next meeting. What is the first Thursday in January? MR. HOVELL: The 3rd. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I'm not saying we need to decide this today, but I want everybody to think about it. We do meet in January, and the 3rd -- we'll talk about that in a second, if it's too close to New Year's or not. We need to consider at least that we have two meetings a month in January and February and then in March -- we happen not to meet for some reason in March. It seems to me between the long -term renourishment plan and our ten -year plan in addition to other things that happened to come up, which are of a less recurring nature, we have a lot to do. Why don't we think of that. We can discuss that more in January. I think during that first quarter of the year, we probably do need to meet for more than one meeting a month. How does everyone feel about January 3rd? Well, we're going to be on Marco. Is that our plan, to be on Marco? MR. HOVELL: I believe that's -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: So we're not as restricted as we would be if we needed to use the county commission boardroom. MR. HOVELL: If it means anything, I believe the Tourist Development Council's meeting on the 7th and the Board of County Commissioners on 8th, so if we wanted to review something -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Then we almost have to meet the 3rd. I was Page 57 December 6, 200116J 2 thinking we could meet the 10th, but that doesn't really work. MR. KROESCHELL: That's fine. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We will meet then, as has become our regular schedule, January 3rd at 1:30 p.m. We'll receive details. We're going to be assembling on Marco Island and hopefully we'll get to see the sites this time. At that time -- and maybe you can make a notation on the agenda to make sure we remember to discuss it -- we want to consider meeting twice a month for the next three months. MR. KROESCHELL: Consider the possibility of meeting someplace other than Mackle Park -- everything is going to be at the north end of Marco Island and then ending up at Mackle Park -- rather than go all the way to Mackle and then back out again. I don't know where we can meet. MR. SNEDIKER: Tigertail Beach. Maybe it will be our first field trip stop. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: There's plenty of capacity there where we could find each other there, I assume. MR. SNEDIKER: Oh, yeah. It's not that big. MR. HOVELL: How about tentatively we'll say 1:30 at Tigertail Park. We'll just call the meeting to order for the field trip part. But then for calling in the reporter and whatnot, we'll pick a time certain, maybe 3:30, if that seems like enough time, or 4:00, whatever seems right. MR. SNEDIKER: We just have two stops. MR. GRAY: I would say earlier. MR. KROESCHELL: Okay. So 3 or 3:30 at Mackle Park where we have the facilities to have a room and whatnot. MR. HOVELL: Okay. I'll work with Mr. Snediker on timing, because I think the biggest issue will be getting in and out of Hideaway and transportation, parking, and that kind of stuff. We've already been to the south end, so I'm assuming all we need to do is Tigertail and Hideaway this go- around? MR. KROESCHELL: Yes. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Very good. Does anyone on the committee have anything else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: If not, we stand adjourned. Page 58 December 6, 2001 16J There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 4:40 p.m. COASTAL AREA ADVISORY COMMITTEE GARY GALLEBERG, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF DONOVAN COURT REPORTING, INC., BY MARGARET A. SMITH, RPR Naples Daily News Naples, FL 34102 Affidavit of Publication Naples DaiLy News BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHRIS HORTON PO BOX 413016 NAPLES FL 34101 -3016 REFERENCE: 001230 31150802 58339115 NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEE State of Florida County of Collier Before the undersigned authority, personaLLy appeared Angela Bryant, who on oath says that she serves as Assistant Secretary of the NapLes Daily News, a dpi'y newspaper published at NapLes in COLLier County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates Listed. Aff:ant further says that the said NapLes DaiLy News is a newspaper published at NapLes, in said CoLlier County, FLorida, and that the said newspaper has h eretofore been continuously published in said CoLlier County, Florida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in Naples, in said CoLlier County, FLorida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publiction in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ON: 10129 AD SPACE: 76.000 INCH FILED ON: 10129/01 Signature of Affiant ------------ - -- - -- - J,G e2e, Sworn to and Subscriued be me thi s day f L � 20 � Personally known by me _) �J —��( ,00100N Donna Ch my MY Commission DDO56336 O� wd; Expires September 11, 2005 16J 2 16J 2 Coastal Advisory Committee November 1, 2001 Reconvened at Horizon Way access to Park Shore beach with Ms. Lupo, Mr. Pires and Mr. Stakich not present. The exposed seawalls were pointed out and a brief description of the upland sand placement was given. Reconvened at Lowdermilk Park. The dune damage was pointed out. Reconvened at 4550 Gordon Drive. The various groins and Gordons Pass were detailed. November 1, 20 16J 2 COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE November 1, 2001 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Coastal Advisory Committee met on this date at 3:34 p.m. In REGULAR SESSION at Naples City Hall, 735 Eighth Street South, Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRPERSON: ABSENT: Gary Galleberg David Roellig John P. Strapponi James L. Snediker Robert B. Stakich William Kroeschell Robert Gray Anthony P. Pires Ashley D. Lupo ALSO PRESENT: Ron Hovell, Public Utilities, Beach Renourishment Coordinator Roy Anderson, Public Utilities, Director of Engineering Jon Staiger, City of Naples Natural Resources Director CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We're going to reconvene the November 1st, 2001, meeting of the Coastal Advisory Committee. We had recessed in order to take our field trip to three spots on the City of Naples stretch of beach. I'll note for the record that the same six members that were here at 1:30 are present; in addition, Mr. Stakich has arrived. Ms. Lupo and Mr. Pires are absent from the panel today. We've done the roll call. We've done the field trip procedures, of course. Item 3, are there any additions to the agenda from staff? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: No additions? Old business, Item 4 -A. That is the approval of minutes. I had noted one thing, and I know -- I think that Mr. Snediker had noted it as well. We don't have him listed as either present or absent at the October 4th meeting. You were absent; is that correct? MR. SNEDIKER: That's correct. I was absent. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Does anyone else have any other changes? Page 1 November 1, 2001 16J 2 MR. KROESCHELL: On page 2, the remarks attributed to me, Mr. Kroeschell, were made by Mr. Pires. I don't think I could spell geodetic. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Anything else? MR. ROELLIG: We're back on page 1. My first comment about two lines up from the end, it says end of Sanibel Beach Road. Actually, it's Vanderbilt Beach Road. It wasn't that big a field trip. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Anything else? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Do we have a motion for approval? MR. KROESCHELL: Second. MR. STRAPPONI: Second. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Mr. Stakich I believe it was. All in favor? (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It passes unanimously. Okay. Mr. Hovell or Mr. Anderson, Item 4 -B. MR. HOVELL: Okay. The -- a couple of meetings in a row now we've had some discussions about what, if any, impact might the potential land purchase of that last remaining parcel on Barefoot Beach have on our TDC budget, specifically the beach budget. At a recent Board of County Commissioners meeting, if you happened to see it, the owner of that property was present when the board voted to purchase the land. It's my understanding, although I haven't seen any documentation, that they -- that the board and the county staff have made plans to use the general fund to pay for the debt service, I think is the way they worded it, until such time as they can pursue some state grants to purchase the property. I've been told that there will -- would not be an attempt to use TDC funds, and so I think that means that we're no longer concerned about this issue. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, that's good from our point of view, and then we'll just keep monitoring that, with your -- with your assistance, as it develops. Any questions or comments on that item? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Item 4 -C. MR. HOVELL: In your agenda package I have given you the five -page report that I have indicated; I think last time was the first time I handed one out. I'll just provide this monthly in the agenda package. I won't typically have a lot to say about it other than for your information or if you have any questions. What I would point out for this particular one is the last report was, in essence, a last prior fiscal year information. This one contains all the new budget information. So this particular report, when you look under column labeled current as clear appropriation, Page 2 November 1, 2001 16J 2 were now talking about the new year and the new projects. The column just to the left of that, unencumbered, unexpended, rollover from previous fiscal year, you will now see figures in that column which were carried over from September 30th, any -- any purchase orders that were open and not -- the bills hadn't been paid, I guess, is the way to put it. That amount was rolled over into the new year. And just as an example, because I know this one seems to be a rather high- interest item for now, if you turn to page 4, a little less than halfway down, Project No. 10259, the Parker Sand Web system, you'll see that that amount now is under a million dollars. That's the amount of money that had not already been paid to this -- City of Naples as reimbursement for their project. I think the original amount was more on the order of 1.1 million and some -- some change. Any difference between the grant amount and whatever the city spends ultimately on the project -- (Mr. Staiger entered the room.) MR. HOVELL: -- unless another grant application is approved would be the responsibility of the city that -- to make up the difference. Were there any other issues that this raised that anybody would like me to address? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Questions or comments? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. Next we have Item 4 -D, which is the rock removal plan. MR. HOVELL: Again, in your agenda package I provided a copy of the -- of the plan and cover letter that was submitted to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection on October 22nd. I can tell you I've received no feedback at this point. I've tried to touch base with some of the folks up there to see if they have any initial reaction, and they have none to provide at this point. I know I've talked to a couple of you individually about questions that you may have had prior to finalizing this, but aside from that, I don't really have anything to add unless there were questions. Mr. Snediker. MR. SNEDIKER: I have one question on the -- under the subject, Phase D, is we talked on the phone on around the 3/8 -inch screening. To me that seems very, very fine especially when you consider having a lot of those shells out on the beach. Were any other people -- did any other people comment on that or -- MR. ROELLIG: I believe I did. MR. HOVELL: I think at least one other person did, and we actually -- Al went to over to a testing company and got some screens, and we had a quick parking lot experiment with both wet and dry sand on 3/8 -inch and 3/4 -inch screens. And depending on the quantity of rocks and whatnot that might be in there, a three -- 3/8 -inch screen clearly clogged up with wet sand, especially if it had any amount of rocks in it. It -- it just became almost undoable. And there was a lot of discussion about the way previous contractors have done the work. But for a lot of reasons, I was -- 0:- November 1, 2001 MR. SNEDIKER. Its 3/8 of an inch. 16J MR. HOVELL: 3/8 of an inch. MR. ROELLIG: You mentioned, when I talked to you about doing some comparison samples, taking a core below the area of renourishment to see what the so- called natural beach would have been before the sand was there. Do you still plan on doing that? MR. HOVELL: Well, I think any questions I would answer relating to what we plan on doing would be under the assumption that the plan is minute the way it was submitted. And so, yes, I think if the plan is approved the way it was submitted, we would -- in an attempt to determine what the natural beach composition is, rather than go up or down the beach to some area where we perhaps not renourished, what we thought we would do is make sure we go below the -- the nourishment line and go down and pull core samples that way to pull samples rather than the, quote, unquote, old way. And so, yes, that would be our position. MR. ROELLIG: I agree with Mr. Snediker. Otherwise we've only 2 percent. We've got to be more than 2 percent shallow which would be more than 3/8. MR. SNEDIKER: We're going to -- an awful lot of shells off the beach. MR. ROELLIG: Yeah. So if the plan is to just take off the amount of background material, that's not a problem. But if we end up taking off a bank raw material, then where -- we take a lot off the beach. MR. SNEDIKER: If it goes through the screen -- everything is going to go through the screen. Rob, why were we -- maybe I shouldn't ask this, but why are we being forced to encourage by the expression on your face that -- to go with the 3/8 of an inch? MR. HOVELL: Let me answer that in a different way. MR. SNEDIKER: Okay. I'm not trying to embarrass you. MR. HOVELL: Regardless of the size issue, which, you know, that's an interesting one in -- in and of itself. But once you've determined, regardless of -- of the size, once you've determined that an area is outside of what you determine to be the natural percentage of rocks as -- that occurs in there, if you then go in and screen out anything larger than that size, in theory you're going to reduce the percentage to zero. So you're going to -- the pendulum is going to swing too far the other way, and there's a lot of discussion about, you know, what's natural, what should be left when we're done. I know people who were kind of supporters of the natural beach would tend to tell you that you can find rocks -- for instance, Key Island that we were just looking at on the other side of Gordon -- Gordon Pass, you can find rocks down there, and we've never done anything down there. So where do you draw the line? I think the general intent of this plan is to maintain those areas of beaches that we previously renourished and -- and in some people's opinion caused damage and harm to by putting rocks in there. It's -- it's to -- to get away from the past of digging big deep im November 1, 2001 b J 2 trenches and big deep holes and attempting to sift the entire quantity and yet still have rock show up. I think the general intent of this plan is to, in essence, pick up rocks as they show up down to a certain level. But certainly over time you're going to have erosion, whatnot. So just repeatedly over the years we're going to wind up back out there resifting the top layer of sand, raking up what's exposed, going out in the trough where hard- bottom rocks maybe continue to roll in or whatnot with the idea being that those who have raised these issues about too much shell and my feet hurt when I walk in it and it's all your fault because of the -- the failed project from years ago that we'll have, at least from a user's point of view, provided a -- a nice beach on any given day. MR. SNEDIKER: I mean, can I ask -- the question in another -- another way, if I may? Who determines the 3/8 of an inch? MR. HOVELL: There was a meeting with a number of folks in the county, as well as some of the more local critics, of what's been done in the past. And ultimately I guess it was Jim Mudd who's now the deputy county manager who made the decision and said, you know, after hearing all the input that -- that we needed to leave the plan the way it was written. MR. SNEDIKER: I, for one, think that's overkill. The truth, Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. Thank you. MR. ROELLIG: I concur. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It -- it probably is. At the same time, it is part of a larger settlement issue, so I would imagine that's how Colonel Mudd made his decision. Next on our agenda, the final item of old business, 4 -E, Tigertail Beach and Sand Dollar Island. MR. HOVELL: We've been discussing this on and off for a while now. At the same time perhaps because of Mr. Snediker's suggestion or for whatever other reason, the parks and recs folks looked to organize a meeting with a member from the Department of Environmental Protection, as well as those in the local area who are interested. And when they called me and asked who might be interested, I certainly indicated that I would expect at least somebody from the Coastal Advisory Committee would be interested. The short of it is, there's a meeting scheduled for Thursday, the 8th of October at two o'clock down at Tigertail Beach. MR. KROESCHELL: The 8th of October? MR. HOVELL: I'm sorry, November. Next week, not three weeks ago. And originally I had -- I had spoken to Mr. Snediker about attending. Originally it was scheduled for tomorrow and he had planned on attending that. However, next week he's not able to make it at that particular time that they scheduled it. MR. SNEDIKER: I'm going to rearrange my schedule. I will be there. MR. HOVELL: Oh, you are going to make it? MR. SNEDIKER: (Nodded head.) MR. STAKICH: What day is that? Page 5 November 1, 2001 MR. HOVELL: The 8th -- the 8th of November. 16J 2 MR. GALLEBERG: A week from today. MR. HOVELL: Yeah. A week from today. MR. SNEDIKER: Two o'clock. MR. STAKICH: Time? MR. HOVELL: Two o'clock. MR. KROESCHELL: This is Tigertail Beach? MR. HOVELL: This is Tigertail Beach. And it's basically parks and recreation, myself, somebody from Department of Environmental Protection, I think probably somebody from -- where did Maura go? Maura's shaking her head yes. Maura Krause from our natural resources section; she monitors the turtles. I don't know what other folks arranged the meeting. But, anyway, that's one step to -- to attempt to kick around some ideas and take a look at what we should consider doing in the future from a maintaining the viability of the beach -front park. On the other side of the equation, I think at the last meeting I had provided a -- I think it was only one page or two pages maybe out of the only reports I could find up to that point that might help us look at the past. Just recently Harry Huber has been continuing to clean out both his office and all the boxed -up files that have been moved around as -- as he was shuffled around between the different departments. He came across a box with a lot of Sand Dollar Island paperwork in it. And it looks like it goes back to about 1990. So I'll start sifting through that and seeing if we can't find some things in there that might help us look at the past so we can help predict the future. I would just note, in general, that some of the aerial photographs I looked at were right about the 1990 time frame. And much like we're concerned now that the lagoon is going to perhaps become a little inland lake for a while, become very stagnant, that was, in fact, the case back in about the 1990 time frame. The aerial photographs showed that both ends of the opening were -- were closed. So it obviously keeps changing back and forth over time. And I think the question is how do we -- how do we best adapt our -- our beach park to the ever changing environment there. MR. GRAY: Is this -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Go ahead. MR. GRAY: As I recall, we started talking about this in earnest because of, I guess, the Department of Health's report of contaminated water there. And I think since - - I think they looked at it two or three times, as I recall. Since then I haven't seen anything in the paper where they've had further problems. MR. STAIGER: There haven't been any. MR. GRAY: There haven't been any? MR. STAIGER: Yeah. They -- they're still sampling, but they -- they're still sampling, but there hasn't been any problem. MR. GRAY: Okay. Page 6 November 1, 20016J 2 MR. SNEDIKER: Okay. And that's not the real reason. I think the real reason is kind of the fact that the lagoon which is now closing in, closing its head -on peninsula, as you have noted many times, Ron, and it's getting worse and worse. On the -- the health situation was -- but it did come up in the newspaper. But, you know, that's -- as far as I'm concerned, at least, from Marco Island, that's a minor point. The future Tigertail Beach which is our most popular -- as I understand, one of the most popular county park beach we have, from beach -- beachgoers' point of view, it's getting worse and worse. From an environmental point of view, that's a -- some major problems there, too, and we do not want to, you know, turn our heads away from those. The lagoon is not going to get filled in; there's no question about that. That -- that will never get done. It will never pass by -- you know, hundreds of people will turn that down who have the authority to turn it down. But we should figure out what we can do. I read in your letter dated October 12th, Ron, as a beach committee member requesting that the county come up with a study, a -- a -- call it a projection, what the Tigertail lagoon, if you will, whatever you want to call that, would be looking like two years from now and five years from now or sometime. I don't care exactly what years we're talking about. But I think something that would be very good to have, both in parks and recreation, so they can sort of forecast what their beachgoers are going to have available to them. Something that would be very difficult to forecast, we have no idea what hurricanes are going to do; we have no idea what tropical storms are going to do. But I think engineers with their background could come up with some reasonable story for that. Is that something we would want to discuss at this time? MR. HOVELL: In the normal course of events, I would say that something that isn't already in this year's budget would become a potential project for consideration for the next cycle, which would mean should it get approved in that normal cycle, we would have the money come October 1 st, 2002. If you feel that that's satisfactory, then we can just make those plans. If you feel that that's too far down the road, then we would have to have some way of generating a request for consideration by the TDC at their next meeting, which I think is in January and, perhaps, getting the Board of County Commissioners to approve a budget amendment to this year's budgeted amendment. MR. SNEDIKER: I'm not talking about a big elaborate city. I'm talking about maybe a couple contour drawings and maybe a two -- a couple -page narrative. Now, last spring we did something -- MR. HOVELL: I can't spend a dollar on this issue unless we -- we get a grant application. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Does the TDC have any contingency funds -- MR. HOVELL: Not -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- in a budget sense? MR. HOVELL: Not anymore since we moved in -- in essence -- Page 7 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: $700. MR HOVELL: Yeah. November 1, 20 1 6J 2 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Because I -- I would -- I think from the standpoint of practicality, we ought to not forget that issue, keep it on our list, but put it -- you know, we'll -- we'll be presenting -- I assume next year we'll be presenting a list of things we think are warranted, TDC sunds -- TDC funds for -- and let's keep that in mind. And, you know, if we feel as a group that should be on the list, put it on then because it's -- it's not -- if it's unfunded, it's not going to be done this year. MR. STAKICH: I, for one, feel that 202 is -- 2202 (sic) is too a -- long a period. I think that something should be planned and we proceed in that regard as soon as possible. I think we discussed that two meetings ago, and it was determined that you were going to look into and see what we've done in the past, what we could do now, and how soon can we move on it. I -- I would like to see that as a priority item in the future, not too far in the future. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We're lacking a mechanism from a realistic point of view for it to happen. MR. HOVELL: The only realistic option as far as getting money available this year would be to pull it from an existing project, and the only one that has real money in it is -- is the major beach renourishment project. And perhaps given that that's next on the agenda, you would prefer to have me give the update on that, and then we can come back to this subject. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I'd like to do that. Also, before we move on from 4 -E, I wanted to ask Mr. Hovell, is this meeting, this interagency meeting, going to be a public meeting, or is it a nonpublic meeting? MR. HOVELL: No. The -- I don't think so. I think the intent was to just have, in essence, staff. And we -- that's -- I noticed everybody was writing it down. I guess that would be an issue if more than one committee member was coming. No. The intent was not to make it a public meeting. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Then I was going to suggest maybe someone would make a motion to this effect, that we appoint Mr. Snediker to go to the meeting, attend, and -- and report back at our next meeting. And I would just then remind everyone that because of Sunshine rules, we would have to have only Mr. Snediker there for it to -- to have any real purpose. MR. GRAY: So moved. MR. ROELLIG: I'll second that. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: All in favor? (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Opposed? (No response.) November 1, 20 16J 2 CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That passes unanimously. MR. GRAY: I would also like to add in regards to this that I'm not quite sure when -- what TDC -- what their schedule is for budgeting for next year. But if they -- if they're starting that at their January meeting, they won't be -- MR. HOVELL: No. I'm sorry. The normal TDC cycle -- since they meet four times a year, the normal cycle is for them to consider grant applications in April. And I would just think that given that's their cycle, that it has to go through this committee first. Then we'd probably want to -- and that's up for discussion. But perhaps rather than doing it at one of the normal monthly meetings, maybe we have a -- a workshop in January just to kick around ideas and -- and, you know, not necessarily make any decisions but just look at lots of different options so that as we then develop the projects in about the February, March time frame and submit them to this committee and then to TDC, I don't know that I have the exact date, but I think it's -- early April would be their meeting. MR. GRAY: Maybe Mr. Snediker could report back to us at our next meeting and then put this on the agenda to look at as something that we might want to give to T -- TDC when they start funding. MR. SNEDIKER: Okay. Maybe one thing we can do, Ron and Mr. Chairman, in my letter of October 12th to you, my request, could you come up with at our next meeting here a budget number for that? I'm guessing we're talking about a very small -- relatively speaking, a very small amount of money to do that report. It's not a big deal. We did a report on Sand Dollar Island I think very, very economically last spring and did not have to go through a lot of hoops. We might spend more time and effort approving the project than what the project is worth to do. Just come up with an idea of what I'm talking about. Are we talking about a $10,000 number? I'm talking about a $3,000 number, something. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I was going to suggest that and just really a ballpark, you know, to the -- MR. SNEDIKER: Yeah. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: -- to the nearest factor of ten even. Is it a thousand, ten thousand, a hundred thousand, whatever? And if it is, indeed, in terms of effort and cost a small project also to see if it can be tucked in somewhere, legitimately tucked in to perhaps a related activity because I think it would be a worthwhile exercise. I don't think it's worthwhile to send something to TDC where we know there isn't a mechanism this year. MR. HOVELL: My understanding of the list of projects that I have -- and you -- you know, you now have that list and that project status report. Each of those grant applications, in essence, has a scope of work. None of them include anything related to doing beach - related work at Tigertail Beach, and therefore, for me to spend any money there, I think we are going to have to go to the TDC and -- and follow that up with a budget amendment if we're trying to get it this fiscal year. That's fine. I don't mind doing Page 9 November 1, 2001 16J 2 that. I'm just saying procedural, I think that's the way we're going to have to go. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That answers the second half of my question. There isn't anything related such that it -- it might be -- this goal might be amended and have that tacked on. So if somebody would like to make a motion, we'll entertain a motion. However, as I've said, I personally would -- would not favor going to the TDC when -- when there isn't really an avenue to get it budgeted this year. MR. HOVELL: Well, I think -- you know, understanding that there's really no reserves to pull from but also understanding that you want to do the project and -- and that there are other projects that are approved that perhaps can't be executed this year, at least not fully, I just need the TDC approval from a authority -to- spend -money point of view. I could -- there's plenty of projects to make recommendations to say at least for this year we could pull money out of in the form of a budget amendment and then include in next year's budget enough money to actually do the work when -- when we'll then have the plans and specifications and the construction contractor all lined up to do it. So I know it's a little bit of creative financing but -- but it -- it can be done. MR. SNEDIKER: Okay. Well, let's have a meeting next week and then come up with some numbers for us, and then we can talk about it at our next meeting. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: That sounds good. If there are no other questions or comments on that item, we'll move on to new business, 5 -A, which is an update on Tropical Storm Gabriel. MR. HOVELL: This has been a real learning experience for me to -- to go through an effort to try and come up with all the plans and permits and public access points and whatnot to do 400,000 cubic yards of sand in the relatively short time frame. Between the FEMA requirements, the state permitting requirements, almost daily if you asked me where we're at and when do I think we're going to start and what do I think we're going to do first, you've probably got a different answer for me. So today I'll attempt to tell you where we are today, but I won't swear to you next week that it will look anything like it does this week. First, let me start with -- with state permits. The only reason we can even consider trucking in the quantities of sand we're talking about is because we happen to have existing permits that cover certain sections of Vanderbilt, Park Shore, Naples, and Marco Island beaches. And somewhere on my list of things to do I hoped to kind of put that on a -- on a map or a chart for you to specifically show you which areas are within our permit boundaries and which areas are not. I've attempted to describe them in words before and when we've gone out on our field trips so you have some sense of it. So within those currently permitted areas, we have a requirement to maintain the beach in the form of going out and raking it and whatnot, as well as the authority to pursue getting what they call a notice to proceed under those permits to place up to 50,000 cubic yards of sand on any given year, the idea being that over the years you will have erosion on your beaches. And in order to help defer or delay the ultimate need to do Page 10 November 1, 20011 b J v 2 another major restoration project of -- of an offshore dredge effort that might result in something like a million cubic yards, doing the 50,000 a year was just meant to do hot - spot maintenance over those years. When I went to the state and started discussions about how we might be able to change or modify those permits or in some way, shape, or form get authority to do more than 50,000 yards in one year, I don't know if it's because it wasn't in writing or we really didn't understand each other or what, but the initial reaction from the state was, that shouldn't be too hard to modify the quantity from 50,000 to 400,000 for a one -time event in one year and then in future years you go back to 50,000 yards. Unfortunately, over the last month what I've come to find out is the only way they feel they can do this is to change the wording of the permit from 50,000 cubic yards per year to 50,000 yards periodically. And what that means is that -- and, again, I'm not sure how this is going to work out, but even if we start -- today is November 1 st; it's the end of turtle season. If we had all other things lined up and we started work on Park Shore today where I do, by the way, have a notice to proceed for 50,000 cubic yards on Park Shore which happens to be just enough to cover what we estimate to be the damages, I'm not sure if they would require me to get all the way to the end of that effort before they would consider issuing the next notice to proceed for 50,000, for another beach segment, or if they would consider issuing concurrent notice to proceeds at different beach sections. And part of reason I don't know is because, even though they've left me voice mails saying that they have, in fact, modified that permit to -- to use that periodically versus annually, I still haven't seen it in writing. So it's kind of hard to get past, okay, well, what does that really mean. Going back to our damage estimate, the four hundred thousand cubic yards was split up, about forty thousand on Park Shore and about thirty or forty thousand on Marco. So both of those segments of beach would fit within a single notice to proceed, the way the state is lining things up. But both Vanderbilt and Naples become a much more interesting subject to say, how am I going to start and what am I going to ask for for only 50,000 yards at a time on those beaches when I need on Naples 200,000 yards and on Vanderbilt 120,000 yards. And, again, I'm not sure. So does that mean I -- I can ask for 50,000 yards and maybe say from Doctor's Pass to some intermediate point like maybe Lowdermilk Park or something? And, oh, by the way, concurrently, I want a notice to proceed from Lowdermilk down to the pier, or are they going to require me to do the 50,000 -- you know, get more or less to the end of that before they'd issue the next one? I mean, all of those things are unknowns to me at this point. And so it's very difficult for me to tell anybody beyond, perhaps, starting Park Shore when we might get to something, to what extent we'll be able to do anything. The other complicating factor that they acknowledge exists but they really can't tell Page 11 November 1, 20011 6 J 2 me what they think about it is when you get to those sections of Vanderbilt and Naples beaches that are under the consent order to remove rocks, if we have to do that work first and they haven't approved our rock removal plan, it would lead me to believe that they're not going to provide notice to proceeds in those areas, if not the entire lengths of those segments of beaches. So there's still an awful lot of things up in the air related to permits, and I really have no good guesstimate of how they're going to work out at this point. From the FEMA reimbursement point of view, it -- it's also been a very confusing learning process. We had initially, as you probably recall, started down the road asking the Board of County Commissioners to waive the normal procurement rules, and we went out with requests for quotes versus the normal bid process. We were on our way to receiving those quotes when the -- the FEM -- the FEMA consulting engineers, one of which -- one of the three of which had been through this a number of times before, told me that he didn't feel that that was not only an appropriate thing to do but that it would conflict with the FEMA guidance, and that, perhaps, it would put our potential reimbursement at risk. That particular issue I was able to find in the FEMA public assistance guide that it specifically does require that you use a normal contracting process for anything other than emergency work, and their definition of work -- emergency is an imminent risk to health or human safety. And so since restoring the beaches doesn't fit that category, we -- we canceled the request for quotes and are now going through a normal contracting process. The two normal contracting processes that we have are -- are, in essence, low bids or requests for proposals where you base your selection more on a best value based on firm experience with -- with costs being one of the factors. So at this point we're expecting to receive proposals in late November to have any contractors available to do any work. MR. SNEDIKER: Is that for the sand and the trucking or just the sand? MR. HOVELL: It's both. MR. SNEDIKER: Both. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: But if we've already -- does -- the county has already determined its sand sources, how do you -- how do you bid that? MR. HOVELL: Well, that's another one of those lessons learned that we're now -- and I appreciate the question because you -- you were on the selection committee for the sand source, and we were just in a process and have, I believe, consummated the contracts with E. R. Yanna (phonetic) and Big Island Excavating. But the scope of those contracts was based on the assumption that we would be doing the annual 50,000 cubic yards. So when we had written the request for proposals, we had anticipated a range of sand requirements in any given year. 400,000 yards falls outside of that range. And in order to get a quantity larger than about sixty or seventy thousand yards, we're going to Page 12 November 1, 2001 16J 2 have to resolicit and reestablish contracts based on that larger anticipated quantity. And in -- in fact, after discussing it with purchasing, we -- we realized we boxed ourselves in by putting an estimated quantity range on there. And -- and so this time we're just -- we're just going to be silent on quantity. We're just saying we want to find a sand source, regardless of -- of how much we need. And then we'll -- we'll have -- in the proposals we'll have them tell us what their production capacity is, you know, in addition to all the other geological data. And based on the number of contracts we establish, we'll have to pick and choose to -- to match our needs at the time. And I believe Mr. Strapponi's going to be on that new selection committee, assuming we continue to go through with that. That one is out on the street. I believe that the proposals are due -- well, I think with the Thanksgiving holidays, I think the proposals are due on the first Monday after Thanksgiving, on the 26th of November, if I recall correctly. And then the other piece of the FEMA issue was that because we do have some contracts that are standing contracts for things like debris removal or storm recovery, there was a lot of discussion with the FEMA reps, as well as the county staff, purchasing, and attorneys and whatnot about whether or not we could potentially make use of an existing contract in the interim of finding a hauling, placing, and grading contractor to the -- to this process that we're kicking off now. I think in the end we have determined that we do, in fact, have a storm recovery contract with a firm called Phillips & Jordan. They were selected under our request for proposal process in which price was not a factor at all for their selection. It was strictly based on experience and capability to do work related to storm recovery, up to and including assembling the paperwork to file with FEMA to potentially receive reimbursement. So I think once we get some final paperwork ironed out under that particular contract, what we're hoping to do is start on Park Shore where we happen to have a notice to proceed from the state for 50,000 cubic yards and use the Phillips & Jordan contract to haul, place, and grade onto that particular beach. And if all goes at least fairly well, I would say I hope to start that on the Monday after Thanksgiving, the 26th of November. The other beaches, whether it's Marco Island, would probably be the next most likely place that I could get everything lined up to get started on. And there's some amount of possibility if -- if, in fact, the state has made the modification to the permit and is willing to consider issuing another notice to proceed, I would think they would certainly do that well in advance of Thanksgiving. So, therefore, we may also be able to start Marco Island at that same time frame. The two that, again, are -- are very much up in the air are Naples and Vanderbilt. Because of the -- both the larger quantity being larger than 50,000 yards of exactly how to -- how to deal with that and the rock removal issue, I'm not sure where we're going to go with those two. Page 13 November 1, 200116J 2 The last piece is there was also a lot of discussion from the FEMA folks, but I -- I asked them to provide me the reference in the public assistance guide, and when I could not find it, you know, I kept going back and asking the question over again. I also asked the question of the state disaster rep. And come to find out that the initial indication that they had given me of not starting work without having had the project approved by FEMA, that does not seem to be a true requirement. So whereas maybe last week or however long ago it was we had assumed that we had to gather all the paperwork, which included finishing the surveys, the post -storm surveys, submit it all to FEMA, and wait some number of weeks or even months for the approval of that project before we could start work, that last bit of that statement does not seem to be true. I think what we can do, based on the most recent discussions, is as long as we have completed the post -storm surveys before we do any work so we would have the accurate data, then we can begin work while they process the paperwork and consider whether or not they're going to approve our projects. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: But that changes the whole equation. I was just going to ask that question. If you start before FEMA approval, you may or may not end up getting FEMA money; right? MR. HOVELL: That is part of the risk if we approach it that way. And I -- it depends on how you feel about it and -- and your particular perspective. But certainly from a budgetary point of view, when we did -- when we made the presentations about doing the budget amendment to the $7 1/2 million, I believe that's what we said going in is that amount of money would all be money that we would have to front and may or may not receive reimbursement for. I don't think this changes that. It's just a question of, would we truly do the work if we knew FEMA was going to say no for some reason and, in essence, spend all or most of that money even though we might not get reimbursed. I don't know how we want to work that into the equation of getting started, if we want to -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, ultimately that's a county commission call, and I might be wrong, but I certainly had the impression that not just this committee but the other county boards and so forth were operating under the assumption of while we would have to spend this money in a cash -flow sense, we would end up in the end spending about a million bucks rather than the 8 1/2 out of our own coffer. MR. HOVELL: And that's -- and I don't know whose decision that is or how we're going to approach it, but it would appear that we would have all other things lined up other than the FEMA approvals. And so at some point someone will have to make that decision, so I guess we'll have to address how that process is going to work. If, in fact, we do want to wait for FEMA approval, again, because of their approval thresholds, the Marco Island and -- or Marco Island and Park Shore segments, since the estimates for those two quantities of sand are less than a million dollars, those packages only have to go to the regional office in Atlanta for approval. Anything over the million - dollar mark for an individual beach segment has to go to Washington, D.C., for the final approvals. Page 14 November 1, 20011 6 2 So, again, we could find ourselves, you know, waiting some number of weeks, months down the road to get those approvals. Well, I'd like not to think -- there hasn't been anybody I've spoken to who's said that the -- that the approval took years. What they've said was it took them years to actually collect the money from FEMA. MR. SNEDIKER: Ron, wasn't there a consulting firm that you had knowledge of that had a great deal of experience with FEMA and could maybe assist you rather than you taking on this whole thing, burden yourself with a brand new task? MR. HOVELL: Well, you know, again, this -- this all -- a lot of the issues, including the one about Tigertail, a lot of these issues kind of keep getting hung up on the fact that we don't have a coastal engineer under contract with the county right now. MR. SNEDIKER: Is that a coastal engineering firm -- MR. HOVELL: Yes, yes. MR. SNEDIKER: -- that had the FEMA experience with that? MR. HOVELL: And it's -- it's made it very awkward to attempt to go out and do something. I went so far the other day as to -- as to talk to the three firms that will soon be under contract with the county about how they might feel about doing something that might sound a little strange compared to the way we normally do business with professional firms. But in reading the county procurement pol -- or purchasing policy which complies with state laws, anything under $25,000 is not subject to the same formal competitive requirements as those things that are over $25,000. And when you read the county purchasing policy, if it was -- if it was a professional services agreement for less than $25,000, one of the options is to just get 3 quotes based strictly on price, though, but just get 3 quotes and take the lowest quote and then hire them to do that work. Normally professional services firms get hired based on qualifications, and then the price is something you negotiate. I haven't quite come to grips with -- with what -- whether we do that or whether we continue to attempt to go to an existing fixed -term contract that the county has, in which case that particular contractor would have to turn around and subcontract the work out to somebody anyway and -- MR. SNEDIKER: Maybe I'm getting ahead of myself now. Are we going to be talking about the -- the three engineering firms sometime on the agenda -- the specific agenda item? MR. HOVELL: No. It's not a specific agenda item. MR. SNEDIKER: Oh. Well, would this be time to talk about -- I'm -- I'm trying -- trying to see if we could get you some help. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We've already -- we've already made a decision on and sent it up to the commissioners o n -- MR. HOVELL: Well, let -- let me -- let me back up for a second and ask if there's any other issues related to the general subject of the beach recovery. If not, I'll be happy to -- to get into the ins and outs of -- of when we're going to have a contract with those three firms. Page 15 November 1, 20011 6 J CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Are there questions or comments? MR. ROELLIG: I have a comment. You know, it's been quite awhile since I've been involved in this, but you'll never know when you're going to get the money. You know, the work will be completed. Auditors will come in. You know, you kind of go on faith unfortunately. So, I mean, you have to -- you shouldn't really feel that you may not get all you're going to get. You're -- you'll never know the final amount until the check comes in the doorway. And that may be two or three, four years later. Who knows? But that's just in a -- the odds are you'll do pretty well. But you may have to go through a lot of auditing after all the work is done. They may be ready for the next storm, but that's just the way you have to look at it. MR. GRAY: I feel pretty much the same way. It's been my experience in situations somewhat like this that if you don't bite the bullet and somehow just go on faith and do what is proper and right to serve our county, you could be sitting around three years from now and nothing would have happened. And I think when we're dealing with the federal government, especially with the situation as it is now since 9/11, there's a chance that we may never get any money. But I think we -- I think we do have the money, and we're going to have monies coming in, maybe not as much as we had thought at one time. But I would suggest that we proceed and document as much as we can and get as much as we can in the way of approvals. And that sounds like a broad brush. Maybe it is a broad brush, but -- MR. HOVELL: Well, it may help to understand how -- I think I started all this off on this general subject of beach recovery by saying that we happen to have existing permits which we can attempt to modify the quantity on and -- and do this. Well, let me tell you how other counties are having to deal with this issue who don't happen to have existing permits that they can move forward with. And it seems to be the general expectation of the coastal engineers hired by FEMA and the disaster recovery folks from both the state and federal level that they come in and take a look at what you have. They expect that you will, in fact, go out and do your post -storm surveys and submit all your paperwork to attempt to get FEMA reimbursement, but they also sort of have a general expectation from experience in other locations that you do not have a way to go out and immediately start work. And if you're going to spend the next year or even two pursuing permits and getting plans and specs drawn up and going through a very deliberate and, you know, unfortunately slow process to ultimately restore your beaches. And some of that expectation is that once you go above -- and I won't say a specific number. But certainly once you get up into a large quantity of sand, the general expectation is that you're going to do a hydraulic dredge event to put the sand on the beach and not truck it in. They haven't said that they wouldn't approve our project based on trucking. Matter of fact, all's they've said is that they -- you know, they would review the paperwork, agree on a damage quantity of sand lost, and reimburse us for our actual costs to replace it. So if we have to truck it in, they seem to be willing to do that. But Page 16 November 1, 2001 16J 2 that's -- what we're proposing to do does not seem to be the ordinary method of recovering from a -- a storm. And so, again, it gives you plenty of time to, in essence -- you would know well in advance of doing a hydraulic dredge event of whether or not FEMA was, in fact, saying, yes, your project was approved. And then as a follow -on to that, a lot of counties are -- are not in the same financial position that we happen to be in either where they don't happen to have reserves available to go out and immediately do something. So from a funding standpoint, they are counting on not only the federal government but the state to cost share as well. And that program allows for -- and I forget the thresholds, but it does allow them to advance money to begin paying for the work. So what we're doing isn't that -- what they perceive as the normal process. And, therefore, when we ask questions about what we can do to accelerate it, we don't get a lot of sympathy, because this is not their general expectation of how things go. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think there's a general sense or has been at least that the only limiting factor really is how many trucks can we get to bring the sand to the beach. But the money -- the money was pretty much in place, and the availability of sand was there and so on and forth. And that clearly is not the situation. I think our -- our committee here, we don't really make or even necessarily advise on funding decisions. That really is up to the TDC to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners. But it's a whole different situation than I thought it was. And I -- I think realistically, we need to get -- we'll get some sand on the beach. Particularly I think we mentioned -- was it Park Shore we have the existing permit? But it seems like we'll spend the season getting paperwork done and -- and learning for the next emergency. I -- I personally think it does change the equation a great deal if it's a leap of faith on reimbursement or whether it isn't, because if we're going to deplete the entire reserves for this event, that may still be the wise thing to do, but I don't think it's a no- brainer, and I'm not sure I would consider it a wise thing to do. I thought and I think we all thought it was really more of a cash -flow issue than an ultimate issue of cost. MR. HOVELL: I don't disagree that -- that there was a general expectation that we could get that FEMA paperwork in relatively quickly. And I don't know. Different people may have had different opinions of whether they thought that unless FEMA seemed to be indicating that there was a particular reason they might not approve it that it was just a question of how much they would approve, and, therefore, we would go ahead and do what we thought was the right thing and receive some amount of reimbursement, you know, plan on receiving some amount of reimbursement. But if we -- you know, if the expectation is that we absolutely know whether or not FEMA has approved the project before we start work -- well, I would just say -- I hear some whispers, never happen. I just say given some of the self - imposed constraints related to not working January 2, March, and given that although we tend to say turtle Page 17 November 1, 200 1 2 season starts on the 1 st of May, in fact, it starts whenever the water temperature reaches a certain -- a certain point. It makes it very, very difficult to even think we're going to get most of this work done before May 1 st. And -- and once you lose that as a premise, it starts to raise a whole lot of other questions in -- in people's minds, I think. MR. ROELLIG: Well, I would recommend you go as quickly as possible on Park Shore. I'm quite sure that they would do partial reimbursements or at least approvals. I mean, you don't have to wait until you get all 400,000 out there. If you get a segment done, you turn it in. MR. HOVELL: Absolutely. If I wasn't clear on that point, we -- they agreed and we are willing to submit a Park Shore project, a Vanderbilt project, a Naples project, and a Marco project. And they're -- they're happy to -- to break it up that way. MR. ROELLIG: Right. MR. GRAY: When you say they, you mean FEMA? MR. HOVELL: Right. MR. GRAY: You know, doing it that way and starting out with Park Shore or wherever we start -- and let's say it is Park Shore -- that might be another tremendous learning curve for you as to how we proceed from there. And insofar as the state is concerned, I think I would get it documented by sending them a letter and having hopefully a response from them that we do have this 50,000 cubic -yard permission as needed, number one; and, number two, let -- let -- let them give us approval to segment these bigger beaches where there's more than 50,000 cubic yards required. I think if you got that documented in a letter, that would cover you there. You know, the FEMA thing, that's another matter. MR. ROELLIG: No. That's entirely different. MR. GRAY: There are three or four things there. But the state thing I would proceed like that with getting some letter guarantees about their permits. MR. HOVELL: I think once they provide the permit modification that allows for something other than just 50,000 yards a year, then I would certainly follow that up with, in essence, requesting notices to proceed for -- as muddy workers get, the very segments, and in some way breaking it up and -- and seeing if they wouldn't give me notice to proceed for, in essence, everything else. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, what we've got in hand right now is 50,000. MR. HOVELL: 50,00 yards for -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: What we have in hand right now is 50,000 yards, and that's both permitted and it's budgeted in the normal course. We do that annually. So then the question on that would remain -- the remaining question on that would be where do we put the 50,000 cubic yards. MR. HOVELL: Right now the notice to proceed says it's going on Park Shore beach only. I wouldn't disagree that if you thought we might not get much more than Page 18 November 1, 200d 6 J fifty or a hundred thousand yards done this year, do we really want to do fifty thousand on Park Shore versus perhaps come up with some other idea of restoring dunes county- wide first and then filling in the hot spots and, you know, see what we can get done before May 1 st? But there's so many things in the air, it's kind of -- it's kind of hard to even make a good recommendation. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Well, I think the first principle would be to get 50,000 yards somewhere this year because we know that's achievable. Not to be sloppy and about it but put priority on getting it somewhere -- if we've got the notice on Park Shore and that's the only reasonable place we can get it done, then it would be Park Shore. And I don't think -- there isn't anything really for this committee to do at this time. It's really a case of keeping us up to date, and I would think as this develops, if it does turn into a situation, that we need to make allocation choices or give our -- our views on that, we'll do that. And if it turns into a situation where the end cost of the TD funds will be significantly in excess of a million dollars, then I think that decision would be revisited by our board as well. MR. SNEDIKER: Ron, if I may add one thing, we -- you mentioned Park Shore and Marco Island. Park Shore, the -- the physical area of the beach at Park Shore where we were just at, Horizon -- Horizon Way and so on is a more popular area tourist -wise, beachgoers -wise than the area of Marco Island that -- that you planned to be doing the renourishment under this program. The area on Marco Island could be done during the winter season, January, February, March. I don't think Park Shore -- to do January, February, March there, that would be a real tough situation. There would be certainly a lot of people. So if you want -- so if you want -- as far as I'm concerned, do that first, do Marco Island during the middle of February if you want to. That way it may work out easier for MR. GRAY: Prob -- probably both those areas, too, from your standpoint and to get something rolling would be easier to work because we've had recent experience. We know -- we know how to work it, so to speak. And, again, I think that -- I think just get the ball rolling and doing it maybe in those two areas or the one area would be a strong learning curve for the county as to how to go from there insofar as FEMA is concerned. But unless we get the ball rolling, we're going to be setting on our duffs, and nothing is going to happen. We're not going to learn anything. We're going to be scratching our head and wondering what's going on. And I agree with Gary; there's not a whole lot we can do except listen and be sympathetic and throw in our suggestions here and there, and that's probably about all we can do at this point. MR. HOVELL: And just to follow up on Mr. Snediker's point too, that's an interesting concept of doing it during tourist season, especially given that it looks like Page 19 November 1, 201 J / .6 we'll be able to work out going through that construction site to access that point, rather than having to go through Resident's Beach which would -- MR. SNEDIKER: That would be very strip -- it's a long -- long travel on the beach too. MR. HOVELL: Yeah. MR. SNEDIKER: You can go right through that point by R -148. That's very easy. MR. HOVELL: Yeah. Unless there's any more, the only other side issue that was left hanging was an update on the three coastal engineering firms that was sort of an offshoot of that discussion. The process is to get the short list approved by the Board of County Commissioners, which was done -- I think it was the 13th of October. Then purchasing works out the fee - schedule issues with the three firms. Once the fee schedules are worked out, they send them contracts to be signed. Once they return to their signed contracts, we present them to the Board of County Commissioners to get the authorization for the chairman to sign them and enter into the contract. And at this point we put it on the agenda for the 13th of November to have -- to present those to the Board of County Commissioners. So assuming all goes well, then later on that same day I could start asking some of those firms directly for proposals. But between now and then, I'm -- I'm still kind of hamstrung on exactly how to proceed. MR. SNEDIKER: Well, let -- let's say assuming all that happens. When do you when would you assign various projects, which is -- you've got a dozen or more projects - - to the various engineers, and when would they -- when will they receive their assignments, if that's the correct word? MR. HOVELL: I've -- I've talked to all three firms. MR. SNEDIKER: Yes. MR. HOVELL: I've given them all the project lists that's available for this year, and I've asked them all to provide comments on if they for some reason had a particular interest in -- in a specific project or if they feel they have a particular expertise that might be better suited to some projects more than others. And, in general, which I think is the right answer, they've all said, "Yeah. We can do any of the work, professional coastal engineers; that's what we're hired for." But just as an example, when I went to the shelf looking up the Wiggins Pass inlet management plan, Coastal Planning & Engineering from Boca Raton happened to do that plan back in 1995. So there may be some sense that -- barring any other input to say, well, then the next -- not this winter but maybe two years down the road or even next year when we have to do some monitoring to perhaps assign that to them since they have a lot of that data already in hand. So I think it would just be a question of divying it up based on the input, which I have not received all of it yet. And it would be my hope to -- to, in essence, ask for requests for proposals for pretty much all the projects on our list within about the first Page 20 November 1, 2001 1 2 week or so of getting the contracts approved so we can get things going. The comment I was making earlier about, you know, we have an awful lot of projects that really aren't going to be executed this year is based on the fact that, you know, they're going to have to go out and -- and kick off the engineering side of this, perhaps it -- either a minor permit mod or -- or at least a notice to proceed under the existing permits before we would be allowed to do any work. And the likelihood of doing both the engineering and then all the purchasing, you know, month -plus process to get a contractor on board and then getting the work done before turtle season to me isn't the very high probability. So I've been pretty much planning on, other than a few select projects, that basically this winter we're going to be doing engineering work. This coming summer when we can't work anyway we're going to be doing all the purchasing work. And come 1 November of 2002, we're going to be very busy doing work, construction work, yes. There you go. MR. SNEDIKER: Thank you. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Anything else on 5 -A from the committee? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: 5 -B, which is the Wiggin -- which is the Wiggins Pass dredging update. MR. HOVELL: I just wanted to provide a quick update on that one. I'm hoping and maybe Ken will let us say yes to get the plans and specs in the next week or so. He says yes. And once we have those in hand, we'll put -- put it out to -- for purchasing to to solicit for contractors. Given the normal time frame, I would say sometime in December we'll -- we'll receive those, go through a process to -- to hire the contractors and then get on with scheduling their availability. So I would tend to say, you know, by February or March we'll be out there dredging Wiggins Pass. I've had a lot of interest from the -- I think it used to be called the Wiggins Pass Conservancy, and now it's called something else. Its letters are ECA, but I hesitate to attempt to say what that means, something about estuary and conservancy, but anyway, they're very concerned because they do have some spots where their boats are bumping or whatnot. But anyway, that's proceeding along. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And do you have a side bet with Dr. Staiger if that one's going to finish before Doctor's Pass? MR. STAIGER: No bets. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Any questions or comments on 5 -B? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: 5 -C, Clam Pass dredging update. MR. HOVELL: As you recall at the -- let's see, how did that work? The last Page 21 November 1, 20011 6 J 2 meeting, October 4th, it was all rather confusing because the Pelican Bay Services Division was attempting to pull what I was presenting as a -- an additional amount of money to be spent to do this project based on Tropical Storm Gabriel, doing a lot of work for them. We did, in fact, though on October 8th and 9th go to the TDC and the BCC and, in essence, get everybody to agree that since this project was budgeted and it's included in this year's efforts and we already had bids in hand that we would, in fact, go ahead and award the contract. It's on the 13th of November agenda for the Board of County Commissioners to award the contract to the -- I believe it was a bid, so the low bidder under that project. And so then we'll get on later in November with scheduling when they would come down and do the work. And then the only modification we'll need to make is instead of the typical way of doing it, which was -- the main interest is -- is doing the dredging, and the disposal was sort of a -- you know, yeah, just put it down there down the beach someplace. There was no real specific desire. We'll come up with a more specific plan of exactly where and how we want them to place the sand mostly to reform the dunes there on the north edge of Clam Pass Park. So that is proceeding. MR. ROELLIG: Basically, as -- as you mentioned, that the -- the work is the same. The purpose has changed. I mean, we're looking -- the original contract was to improve tidal flows, and this is basically obtaining beach - quality sand for the -- the area eroded at the county park and perhaps further south. MR. HOVELL: Yes. And -- and in the end, it was agreed that it still does improve the tidal flow. It just perhaps wasn't as necessary for only that reason. MR. ROELLIG: Now, will this be part of the FEMA reimbursement then? MR. HOVELL: No. Any beach, such as Clam Pass Park or Key Island or I guess it would be Barefoot Park and Delnor Wiggins Park, that receive sand from a dredging -- a pass dredging project, those aren't considered engineered maintained beaches. They consider that more of a matter of convenience of disposing of the dredge spoils. And so they don't -- they don't consider those for reimbursement under a storm condition. MR. ROELLIG: Well, it seems kind of unusual because it's -- I don't know how much, you know -- how much you can -- perhaps when you get the firms on award, they can get together with FEMA because it's basically a -- what you're doing is you're -- instead of trucking sand in, you're pumping it in. And I don't see the great distinction, but MR. HOVELL: The requirement for FEMA reimbursement for an -- for a nonengineered and maintained beach is that there be a -- an emergency related to structural damage at an adjacent facility or less than a five -year predicted storm level of protection. So if for some reason the beach was so flat that a -- something -- a storm of a predicted five -year level or less would then go and do adjacent damage, then FEMA would allow a minimal amount of restoration, even on a natural beach. In order to be classified as an engineered and maintained beach, there has to be a Page 22 November 1, 20016J 2 specific design profile, and you have to continually attempt to maintain it to that profile. Since we don't do that adjacent to passes, what we, in essence, just do is say, well, here's the amount of sand coming out of the inlet. Let's spread it around more or less evenly, and that's it. We don't maintain it to a specific level. Therefore, there's no -- there's no, quote, unquote, damage because there's not a design level to have there. And I guess we could look at -- at attempting to make more of it to provide a specific design template so that in the future we might be eligible, but in this case we are not. MR. ROELLIG: Well, I guess we're learning some things that what we want to do for the future -- obviously, we're going to have more storms -- is to get as many engineered beaches as we can, because if we're going to be looking for reimbursement, we don't want to fall into the same trap every time. MR. HOVELL: That's a great segue into the next agenda item, if you're ready. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Do we have any more questions or comments on Clam Pass dredging? (No response.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Let's move on, then, to the Pelican Bay Property Owners' Association request. MR. HOVELL: I've provided in your agenda package a letter of the September 27th from the Pelican Bay Property Owners' Association to -- to Commissioner Carter requesting, in essence, consideration for taking what is currently a natural beach and beginning to maintain it. The -- the substance of the request is centered more around would there be a way for the TDC funding and /or the other county funding potentially to participate rather than strictly relying on the special taxing unit dollars to do it. But either way, it would become a -- should this project go forward and get done, it would become a -- an engineered and maintained beach, at least in certain segments that they're proposing. And, therefore, if there was another storm down the road after that was done, then -- then they would be more able to pursue FEMA dollars. But this year, again, Pelican Bay wasn't much different than -- than Park Shore or -- or -- or Vanderbilt on either side of it. And yet they are not eligible to receive any FEMA assistance this go- round. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Would you explain the background of this letter a little bit? I assume they're asking for funding to put sand on a private beach. MR. HOVELL: Well -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Is this stretch of north beach private? And they refer to an MSTBU which I'm not -- I know what an MSTBU is. I'm not familiar with this one. Is that the -- MR. HOVELL: I've learned a lot about this general subject but not necessarily related to Pelican Bay. It was more related to the Lely Barefoot Beach area. But in general, it's my understanding that -- how would I put this? Because they're a special taxing unit, once they've collected those taxes, that -- I think becomes public funds, in a Page 23 November 1, 20011 6 J 2 sense. It's just specifically designated for that area. And so although we all tend to think of Pelican Bay as a private entity, in fact, some argument could be made that -- that there's certainly a public part to it. And so when you go -- when you go out on a beach and attempt to understand where does the Pelican Bay -- and I'm not even sure which entity it is, is it the property owners or the foundation or the special taxing unit, but whoever in Pelican Bay owns property, where does that end and where does the state line begin? Well, right now because it's not an engineered and maintained beach, it's the mean high waterline that moves around over the years. If we were to go through a process and establish an erosion control line and have public funds get spent on maintaining the beach, then that would -- that would then establish that permanent property line. There would then be a state property ownership from that erosion control line down. So I'm not sure I've necessarily answered your question. But I think in -- in reading our letter and talking to the county attorneys about the way we can spend various monies, I think the gist of this letter asks not for consideration for a hundred percent but consideration for a cost share from the Tourist Development Council to participate in that. And assuming it's marrying up with other public funds, which would be the special taxing unit funds, I think it's at least -- would not be considered outside the scope of the Florida statute and the county ordinance to -- to consider. It would be a question of priorities and -- and what do you really feel -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: And whether or not this proposal has merit or not, much like the earlier discussion for Tigertail, we would take this up at the next budget cycle, I would think. MR. HOVELL: Oh, absolutely. If this -- this would be at least a year down the road, if not more, considering all of the permitting and whatnot that's going to be required. But long term, could it become something like -- actually, I think a way to equate it, would it become something like Hideaway Beach. The immediately adjacent property owners we all think of as private. But the beach is now a state -owned beach that the county, to some extent, maintains. And I think that's, in essence, what they're looking for here is for participation from -- from the county, whether it be, in this specific case, tourist tax money. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. MR. ROELLIG: Can I just make a comment? I'm a member of the Pelican Bay Municipal Service Taxing government. We do have another -- we got a letter from Carl Mudd responding to that, or I have a copy of it anyway. And I think it's a situation where obviously all the beaches in public -- in Florida are public, but the question is how much access there is and all that sort of thing. And based on this letter dated late -- Oct -- October, I think it's something we'll be working on with the other county agencies because the Pelican Bay Service Division is actually a division of the county. But its Page 24 November 1, 20011 6 J 2 activities are funded by the -- the residents. Now, the -- the Pelican Bay property owners is a -- strictly a private group of some of the property owners in Pelican Bay. So they -- they have no governmental function as such. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We've learned that we have to conclude this meeting in a few minutes because there's another meeting that's -- that's booked for this room. And luckily we are pretty much done. The next item on our agenda is audience participation. I see at least one member in the audience from Marco Island, I believe. Did you want to address us? MS. RYAN: (Indicating) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Good afternoon, and please state your name and affiliation for the record. MS. RYAN: Thank you. For the record, Nicole Ryan, Conservancy of Southwest Florida. And I just wanted to mention with reference to the meeting that is going to take place concerning Tigertail Beach and Sand Dollar Island, that land is state owned, and DEP owns it. However, it is a critical wildlife area. And that is under the management of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. Now, they have been informed about the meeting, but I just wanted that in the forefront of everyone's mind that it's a critical wildlife area, and so the regional biologist for the State Fish and Wildlife Commission really needs to be a part of all of these talks. Thank you. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. MR. SNEDIKER: I think that's -- they're going to be at the meeting; am I correct? MS. RYAN: Actually, I believe the regional biologist cannot make the November 8th meeting, and he has a call in to Murdo Smith. But, yes, he has been informed and in the loop on this. But I just wanted to get that on the record, that they are the ones that manage that land. MR. SNEDIKER: Right. We couldn't have an effective meeting without them. MS. RYAN: I think that it would be important to have someone from that agency, so I just wanted to point that out. Thank you. MR. SNEDIKER: All right. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Thank you. Our next scheduled meeting will be December 6th, first Thursday in December? MR. HOVELL: (Nodded head.) CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: We had -- two meetings ago in September were rained out at the beach -going portion of Marco Island. And I think it would be beneficial to reschedule that -- that portion of the field trip. I don't know how anyone else up here feels. I certainly would like to see more -- MR. GRAY: I would like to. I don't feel like I learned too much about Marco Island at the -- MR. KROESCHELL: I learned how to avoid raindrops, I guess. I would suggest we do it like we've done this time and last time and have the field trip first and then the Page 25 November 1, 200116 J 2 meeting second. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think that's developed into a good routine. MR. SNEDIKER: Mr. Chairman, could I -- may I interrupt for just a -- CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Sure. MR. SNEDIKER: Because there is this meeting next week or sometime soon at Tigertail Beach, which is one of the two items -- two locations to visit and we're talking about some other things, what if we postpone that until January so at December we got a chance to talk about -- our committee itself -- Tigertail Beach and then go out there the next meeting to visit the situation? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think that's -- MR. SNEDIKER: Is that a good suggestion? CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: I think makes good sense. We will -- we will plan, then, Marco -- Marco Island for January 2002. Our next meeting, December, do we have the Board of County Commissioners' chambers or -- MR. ANDERSON: Yes, we do. Yes, we do, Mr. Chairman. We've had to tell them every month that we haven't been using it. But we have a standing request in there for it, so we'll -- we'll get that lined up. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: Okay. We'll next meet, then, at the county commissioners' chambers December 6th, 1:30 p.m. Are there any questions or comments from any committee members? MR. GRAY: I'd just like to comment just in general. I appreciate the fact that we're getting an agenda and all of this information about a week before our meeting. If you -all continue that, it's -- MR. ANDERSON: We will. We will. CHAIRMAN GALLEBERG: It's very helpful, especially for the laymen like me who -- I learn as I go with a lot of this stuff. Okay. Thank you, everyone. We are adjourned. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 4:50 p.m. COASTAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE GARY GALLEBERG, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF DONOVAN COURT REPORTING, INC., BY BARBARA A. DONOVAN, RMR, CRR Page 26 1/115 J CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA 6 J AGENDA Date: December 17, 2001 at 9:00 o'clock A.M. Location: 3301 E. Tamiami Tr., Naples, Florida, Collier County Government Center, Administrative Bldg, 3rd Floor NOTE: ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. NEITHER COLLIER COUNTY NOR THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THIS RECORD. 1. ROLL CALL 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. BCC VS. ROSE, PATRICK W. & ERIN Disposition: Violation found Fiala Carter Henning Coyle Colette CEB NO. 2001 -045 B. BCC vs. Manatee Resort Condominium Association, Inc., Attn. Jim Allen, Ra. CEB NO. 2001 -086 Manatee Resort Condominium Association, Inc., Attn. Austin White, Atty Joseph T. And Janet C. Smith; Peter G. And Deborah K. Smith; James D. Allen, Jr., Edna Roth; Cecil J. And Sharon K. Petitti, II; Anthony P. And Lynn R. Palladino Daniel J. And Diane R. Gavin; Eithne Fulton, Cyril E. Fulton; Gordon E. Ens and Carol J. Dormer; James R. and Joan M. Devore 171625 Canada, Inc., William R. Borbely; Larry J. And Marcelene A. Gode Gary L. Alderman and Mary J. Alderman; Robert J. and Sue A. Massey, Frederick P. Nader; Carol A. Cowell; Gayle Hillman Continued to January 24, 2002 C. BCC VS. HENDRY, BRIDGETT L. Disposition:Violation found CEB NO. 2001 -087 D. BCC vs. BLOCKER, CURTIS D., and BLOCKER Jr., CURTIS D Continued to 1/24/02 CEB NO. IM2001 -02 E. BCC VS. BLOCKER, CURTIS D., and BLOCKER Jr., CURTIS D Continued to 1/24/02 CEB NO. IM2001 -03 5. NEW BUSINESS Request for Imposition of Fines/Lien A. BCC VS. WENDELL L. KRAMER, SALVATOR F. ANGILERI, and SALVATOR C. CRECH Approved B. BCC VS. BELL, RICKY L. Approved C. BCC VS. HUBSCHMAN, SIDNEY JOHN Approved 6. OLD BUSINESS 7. REPORTS 8. COMMENTS 9. NEXT MEETING DATE January 24, 2002 10. ADJOURN CEB NO. 2001 -069 CEB NO. 2001 -078 CEB NO. 2001 -080 "isc. Corres: Date. ftena# I (Pj cop' ;ns To: December 17, 2001 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF T hJ � CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD Naples, Florida, December 17, 2001 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the North Code Enforcement Board, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:01 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: CLIFFORD FLEGAL ROBERTA DUSEK KATHRYN M. GODFREY DARRIN M. PHILLIPS PETER LEHMANN GEORGE PONTE KATHLEEN CURATOLO, ABSENT: DIANE TAYLOR RHONA SAUNDERS ALSO PRESENT: JEAN RAWSON, Attorney for the Board MICHELLE ARNOLD, Code Enforcement Director MARIA CRUZ, Enforcement Official JENNIFER A. BELPEDIO, Assistant County Attorney Page 1 December 17, 2001 (Proceedings commenced, Kathleen Curatolo not present.) 16J 2 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Call the Code Enforcement Board of Collier County to order, please. Please make note any person who decides to appeal a decision of this board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and, therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Neither Collier County nor the Code Enforcement Board shall be responsible for providing this record. Roll call, please. MS. CRUZ: Good morning. For the record, Maria Cruz. Let the record show that Rhona Saunders and Diane Taylor informed at the last meeting that they were going to be absent today. Roberta Dusek. MS. DUSEK: Here. MS. CRUZ: Clifford Flegal. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Here. MS. CRUZ: Kathryn Godfrey. MS. GODFREY: Here. MS. CRUZ: Peter Lehmann. MR. LEHMANN: Here. MS. CRUZ: Darrin Phillips. MR. PHILLIPS: Here. MS. CRUZ: George Ponte. MR. PONTE: Here. MS. CRUZ: Kathleen Curatolo. (No response.) MS. CRUZ: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Since we have one, two, three, four, five permanent members and one alternate, Darrin, you will Page 2 December 17, 200 1 participate fully as a regular member today. (MS. Curatolo entered the room.) MS. CRUZ: Mr. Chairman, let the record show that Miss Curatolo is just coming in -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Oh, okay. Terrific. MS. CRUZ: -- and is present. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Good morning, Kathleen. MS. CURATOLO: Good morning. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Since we're a few regular members short this morning, you will participate fully as a regular member. Approval of our agenda. Are there any changes? MS. ARNOLD: For the record, Michelle Arnold, code enforcement director. Excuse me. I'm requesting that we move Items B, C, and D before Item B. There is a request for a continuance for cases Board of County Commissioners versus Curtis Blocker. There's two cases with that same name: Code Enforcement Board case No. Immokalee 2001 -02 and 03, if we can hear those items prior to the case against the Manatee Resort Condominium. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. You want C, D, and E moved up above B? MS. ARNOLD: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Any more other changes? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: If not, I'd entertain a motion to approve the agenda as changed. MR. LEHMANN: So moved. MS. GODFREY: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion to approve our agenda as changed. All those in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) Page 3 December 17, 20'16J CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have no minutes from our preceding meeting. We will, therefore, go directly to public hearings. The first case in the public hearing is Board of County Commissioners versus Rose, Patrick W. and Erin, Case 2001 -045. MS. CRUZ: I'd like to request or ask if the respondent is present. (No response.) MS. CRUZ: Let the record show that the respondent is not present. This is case No. 2001 -045, Board of County Commissioners versus Patrick and Erin Rose. The alleged violation before this board today is Section 3.9.3 of Ordinance No. 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code. We provided the board and the respondent a packet. I'd like to request that that packet be admitted into evidence, please, marked Composite Exhibit A. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a request for the County's Exhibit A to be entered. Do I hear a motion? MR. LEHMANN: So moved. MS. DUSEK: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second for the county's exhibit. All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) MS. CRUZ: The violation described is removal of vegetation from approximately 1/4 acre of unimproved agriculturally zoned property without first obtaining all the required Collier County permits. This property -- this violation exists at the Section 24, Range 50 -- sorry, Township 50, Range 26, the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter. The owner of record is Patrick and Erin Rose. Their address of December 17, 200 2 16J record is 105 Bass Lane Drive, Kalispell -- MS. ARNOLD: Montana. MS. CRUZ: -- ZIP Code 59901. The violation was first observed on February 12th, 2001. The notice of violation was provided to the respondent on February 12th, 2001. The violation was to be corrected by March 15, 2001, and violations continue as of yesterday. I'd like to turn the case over to Investigator Susan Mason at this time. MS. MASON: Good morning. For the record, I'm Susan Mason, environmental specialist with Collier County Code Enforcement. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: One moment, please. (The oath was administered.) MS. MASON: This case was a result of a referral from the planning department. It has been continued twice before this at the owner's request. Mr. Rose came in to the -- to the county requesting an exotic vegetation removal permit. During his discussions with planning staff member, he admitted to removing six native pine trees. And upon further discussion, they -- both the planning person and Mr. Rose came over to our department and discussed the issue. Upon my investigation I found, though, that approximately one - quarter acre of vegetation was removed, including at least 42 cypress and 24 slash pines. That covered about only half the area ,because in the other half there had been fill spread over, so I couldn't count any stumps. Mr. Rose stated he wanted to put in a tree farm on his property, and that's why he had done the clearing. He should have gotten an agricultural clearing permit which was issued through the county after it has been approved by both state and federal agencies. It is possible that he could get an after - the -fact permit. However, we must get compliance issues settled with South Florida Page 5 December 17, 200116 2 Water Management District and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers before we would be able to issue that permit. The only other way for him to comply would be to replant. There has been no activity on this property. He has not made an application for any of the permits through South Florida Water Management District or the Army Corps. On the 11th -- excuse me. On the 30th of November, I did attend a meeting with two representatives from the district, and they do have jurisdiction over this case. I informed Mr. Rose of this meeting and the fact that he needed to work with South Florida Water Management District to start the permitting process. I left that message on the 3rd and, also, that there was an upcoming CEB hearing. He did not respond to me until the 11th of December where he stated that he would begin contacting South Florida Water Management and the other agencies. We discussed all the other issues. He did inform me he would be unable to attend this hearing today because he does reside now in Montana, and he would begin contacting the district. I talked with Steve Nagel from South Florida Water Management on Friday, and he has had no contact with Mr. Rose. MS. DUSEK: I have a question, Miss Mason. I believe that the first violation was in February of 2001. MS. MASON: Yes. MS. DUSEK: At that time there was a different owner of the property? MS. MASON: No. It was -- it was the same owner. There -- the parcel has been split. He sold off the half that does not have the violation on it. So that part has a different owner, but he owns the section that has the violation on it. MS. DUSEK: Okay. MS. MASON: He did at the time and still does. December 17, 2001 1 � J .� MS. DUSEK: Okay. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Are there any other questions for Miss Mason? MR. PONTE: Yes. Has Mr. Rose indicated to you why he has not applied, why he has repeatedly said he was going to and then doesn't go forward? MS. MASON: He's never -- he's -- he's given some reasons that initially over the summer apparently there were some medical issues with some family members, and there -- I just explained to him he needed to at least start the process and make this a priority. But since then, my understanding, those medical issues have been taken care of, but there's just still been no progress. I don't know any more than that. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Miss Mason, what does he need to do to satisfy the county? MS. MASON: Well, he either needs to come up with a mitigation plan to -- that would be acceptable and replant what was removed, or he can go through that permitting process with South Florida Water Management. My conversation with Steve Nagel on Friday, I asked him if he started right now in earnest going through the permitting process. He felt that 120 days would be more than enough time for him to resolve all the issues with South Florida Water Management, the Army Corps, and then as soon as he got those permits I'd be able to issue an after - the -fact permit for agricultural clearing within a matter of -- of a day. MR. PONTE: If he replants -- that's one of the remedies -- would that mean he would not be going forward with the tree farm, or would that be part of the tree farm? MS. MASON: Well, No. Those trees would not be able to be replanted and later removed and sold. That would be a mitigation that would be monitored over a course of years. And he -- it is still at O December 17, 2001 16J least a 5 -acre parcel that he has left, so he could use the other areas. But that would tie up that part. MR. PONTE: And how long would it take him to replant? MS. MASON: Well, that actually wouldn't take very long at all. Probably -- you could have a plan drawn up and implemented in a -- a month, a month and a half. MR. PONTE: Thank you. MS. GODFREY: Miss Mason, we're in the -- we're in the -- in the dry season, so would it be -- is there any way he could irrigate when he did plant these trees? MS. MASON: He doesn't have irrigation on site. The area is extremely wet, though. It's actually -- still has some standing water. MS. GODFREY: It's in a swamp area with cypress. MS. MASON: That's why the state and federal agencies are involved, because it is a jurisdictional wetlands. MS. GODFREY: And with him doing the dozing and changing the topography of the land, is that going to cause a problem with the neighbors or runoff or -- MS. MASON: There -- there aren't any developed parcels nearby in this area. There's a pretty good -sized buffer, and it didn't really seem to affect the drainage in this area over this past fall. MS. GODFREY: Okay. Thank you. MR. LEHMANN: Miss Mason, Mr. Rose's situation, he needs to obtain clearance from Southwest Florida Water Management District prior to doing the tree farm scenario; is that correct? MS. MASON: Yes. MR. LEHMANN: Does he need that clearance to enable him to follow any county mandated mitigation plan? MS. MASON: No, he would not. I've gotten the indication from them that if he did do replanting that they would want to look at the plan but that more than likely what we would require would be acceptable to them as well. December 17, 20 16 2 MR. LEHMANN: And there's a minimum 120 -day time period to -- MS. MASON: Steve -- Steve Nagel said that that would be plenty of time for him to -- if he came in and meant to resolve the issue, 120 days would be more than enough time. MR. LEHMANN: Okay. MS. GODFREY: Miss Mason, will he have to go in and take out the brush that I noticed that everything is not pushed aside? Will that have to be cleared out, or would it be left there? MS. MASON: He actually had already removed the debris when I showed up. There was one small pile of some trunks, but that was it. The debris has been removed. MR. PONTE: One other question, Miss Mason. Would it be necessary for Mr. Rose to be here to start this process, or can he do it from Montana? MS. MASON: He can do it from Montana. South Florida Water Management does have all their forms available on the Internet, so he could even e -mail them in, and he really would not need to attend anything at all. MR. PONTE: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any additional questions for Miss Mason? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you, ma'am. MS. DUSEK: I would like to make a motion -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes, ma'am. MS. DUSEK: -- that in the case of the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, in the case versus Patrick and Erin L. Rose, CEB Case No. 2001 -045, that there is a violation. And the violation is of Sections 3.9.3 of Ordinance 91 -102, as amended, the December 17, 2001 16J 2 Collier County Land Development Code Ordinance, and the description of the violation is the removal of vegetation from approximately a quarter of an acre of unimproved agriculturally zoned property without first obtaining all required Collier County permits. MR. LEHMANN: I'll second that motion. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second that a violation does, in fact, exist. Any further questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Those opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Order of the board? MR. LEHMANN: Bobby, do you wish to continue, or would you like me to? MS. DUSEK: Well, go ahead, Peter. You take a turn. MR. LEHMANN: Pleasure of the board, I would recommend that we follow staff s recommendation with minor alteration, that the CEB order the respondent to pay prosecution costs and bring the property into compliance by obtaining the county after - the -fact agricultural clearing permit or approved mitigation plan completed within 120 days or a fine of $50 be imposed for every day the violation continues to exist. MS. DUSEK: I second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second. MR. PONTE: Just to -- for clarification, you say 150 days? MR. LEHMANN: Twenty -- 120 days. MR. PONTE: 120 days. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. We have a motion and a second. Any discussion? Page 10 16J 2 December 17, 2001 (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Next case is Board of County Commissioners versus Hendry, Case No. 2001 -087. MS. CRUZ: I'd like to request -- I'd like to ask if the respondents are present. (No response.) MS. CRUZ: Let the record show that the respondent is not present. I'd like to request that the composite that was provided to the respondent and to the board be admitted into evidence at this time, please. MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Chairman, I would so move to do so. MS. DUSEK: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second to enter the county's exhibit. All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) MS. CRUZ: This is Case No. 2001 -087, the Board of County Commissioners versus Bridgett L. Hendry. The violation brought before this board is a violation of Section 103.5.1 and Section 101.4. 10 of Ordinance No. 98.76, which is the Collier County building administrative code. The violation described as the deterioration of the rear roof, fascia, and eaves of the subject building and in need of repair to the point of being unsafe and windows missing throughout. The violation exists at 109 Royal Cove Drive, Naples, Florida. Page 11 December 17, 200116J It is more particularly described as Royal Cove, Unit 2, Lot 9. The owner of record is Bridgett L. Hendry. Their address of record is 109 Royal Cove Drive, Naples, Florida. The violation was first observed on July 27, 2001. Notices of violations were provided to the respondent on August 6, 2001, and October 5th, 2001. Correction dates of these orders were September 6, '01, and October 20th9 '01. The violation remains as of yesterday. I'd like to turn the case over to Investigator Larry Schwartz at this time. (The oath was administered.) MR. SCHWARTZ: Good morning. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Good morning. MR. SCHWARTZ: My name is Larry Schwartz. I'm an investigator with Collier County Code Enforcement. I received a complaint at the location of 10 -- 109 Royal Cove Drive. I went out there, and I observed the roof needed repair, and -- so I wrote out a notice of violation, and then I came -- well, first I came back with my supervisor and John Serenko, who is a building inspector, and he stated that the roof needed repair, that it was deteriorating. So I sent a notice of violation to the complaintant (sic) -- to the violator. At that point it was -- it was lost in the mail. And a postal check showed that they don't -- they didn't remember delivering it, so I sent another violation, a notice of violation out, which came back to me unopened, and nobody accepted it. I made numerous visits to that location attempting to speak to the violator. But every time I was there, a gentleman would come out and say she's not there, "She's with the baby. She can't see you. Give me your card," which I did on numerous occasions. I gave her a card. Then I received a complaint from a neighbor who said that the roof was coming apart and that it was flying into her yard, and she was afraid that that was going to damage her property or worse yet Page 12 December 17, 200116 2 hit her or her husband when they were outside. I went back there on this Thursday, and the gentleman that I spoke to twice before was repair -- was taking down the roof. But at that point I asked him to -- where was his permit, and he didn't have a permit for it, and he was -- instructing him to come into the county and get a permit. I issued him a notice of violation. And as of today there is still no permit obtained, and the violation still exists. They are missing a back window, and a kitchen window is missing, and the roof -- the back roof is totally in -- rotting out. MR. LEHMANN: The roof is still in place? MR. SCHWARTZ: He's -- the person is removing it. MR. LEHMANN: He is in the process of removing it. MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes, he is. MR. LEHMANN: Without a permit. MR. SCHWARTZ: That's correct. MS. DUSEK: When you spoke to him, even though he's just working on the roof, did he say he was doing anything else to the house? Were his plans to do anything else? Replace the windows or whatever else? MR. SCHWARTZ: Remove and replace the roof; that's all he said. And I issued him a notice of violation for not obtaining the proper permits to do so. MR. PONTE: Investigator, in the executive summary here it said it could become a safety hazard. Is it, in fact, a safety hazard? MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes, it is, because the roof is now breaking off and flying into the neighbor's yard. So at that point it was a safety hazard and it was deteriorating. MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Schwartz, did you have a building official dictate it as a unsafe building or a safety hazard? MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes. John Serenko came. I brought him Page 13 / out to the scene, and he said it was unsafe. December 17, 20 T6J MR. LEHMANN: And he is considered an officer of the building official? MR. SCHWARTZ: That's correct. MR. LEHMANN: Thank you. MS. GODFREY: Investigator Schwartz, on page 16 you have it shows the roof rotting, and there is an electrical fixture there. Is there a safety hazard with the electrical shock or water getting in there and causing a problem? MR. SCHWARTZ: No, I was just -- I have it. I was just taking pictures just -- just to get an overall view of it. MS. GODFREY: It shows the rot where it has been leaking, so, therefore, isn't there a hazard of water getting into that -- MR. SCHWARTZ: Yeah. I assume there would be a hazard, yes. MS. GODFREY: And then on page 15 on the back, you show the window. Is that a crack in the back -- in the wall of the -- of the ho -- of the home? MR. SCHWARTZ: I don't -- I can't be a hundred percent sure of that. MS. GODFREY: Okay. MR. SCHWARTZ: But the rear window is missing, and there's a window missing in the kitchen in the front of the establishment. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Investigator Schwartz, you cited the violation as 103.5.1. Why hasn't the county prepared the documents to rehabilitate the building or demolish the building? MR. SCHWARTZ: I can't answer that. I don't know why. MR. PONTE: Investigator, is Mrs. Hendry living in this building? MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes, she is, and she has a small child also. MR. PONTE: And the area of the building that have the Page 14 December 17, 2001 1 6 2 windows knocked out, is that being used as a kitchen and being used for living quarters? MR. SCHWARTZ: It's -- one is the kitchen, and the other is in the -- a side room. It looks like it might have been an add -on many years ago. But there is one in the kitchen. MR. PONTE: Are there no screens on this window, nothing to protect it from the elements? MR. SCHWARTZ: Cardboard. MR. PHILLIPS: Investigator, what type of neighborhood is it? Any other residential properties around the home? MR. SCHWARTZ: They're all mobile homes. It's a mobile home area, about 25 or 30 mobile homes. MS. DUSEK: So it -- excuse me. In your -- in your opinion and the opinion of the building official that came out, this is unsafe not only for the neighbor but for the people living in the mobile home. MR. SCHWARTZ: I feel that way, especially with a young child living there, that it -- that it's unsafe, yes. And she's been given time since July to make the necessary repairs. MS. CURATOLO: Did you explain the permit process to her or to the gentleman working on the roof? MR. SCHWARTZ: She wasn't there, so I had to explain it to him. MS. CURATOLO: And he understood, in your opinion? MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes. And he said he was going to get there the next day because it was towards -- late in the afternoon and obtain the necessary permits to build. MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Schwartz, again, why did the county not act on this prior to coming to the CEB? MS. ARNOLD: Did not act on it in which way? MR. LEHMANN: Does not the county have the ability to abate unsafe buildings themselves without CEB hearing? Page 15 December 17, 2001 16J 2? MS. ARNOLD: When there is an occupant in the building, we don't do that typically. We do that with unoccupied structures. We would bring it to the code board so that the board can order the respondent to correct whatever unsafe conditions there are. MR. PONTE: What if -- MS. ARNOLD: And -- and we're -- this is not -- this is an added -on portion of the -- the main part of the living area. MR. LEHMANN: Uh -huh. MS. ARNOLD: So, again, we wouldn't be taking down the whole building. It would be a portion of the building that's affected. MR. LEHMANN: Okay. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Miss Arnold, are you telling me that -- and telling the board that in 103.5.1 where it specifically says to follow Ordinance 76 -70, that 76 -70 isn't followed if people live in the building? That ordinance says that you do not do that. MS. ARNOLD: The ordinance says that in the event that there is -- 50 percent of the entire structure is unsafe, then we would -- the county has the ability to go in and remove that unsafe structure. It doesn't -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: It also gives -- doesn't it say that you can come up with the cost to rehabilitate the structure and you present that to the owner? MS. ARNOLD: I'm not familiar where you're referring to. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Ordinance 76 -70. MS. ARNOLD: The ordinance that was cited was the minimum building code, and it was the unsafe conditions. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Right. You signed -- MS. ARNOLD: We didn't cite them for the ordinance that you made reference to. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: You cited them for paragraph 103.5.1. If you read that citation, it talks about, if certain things are not there, Page 16 December 17, 2001 16J 2 these buildings are considered unsafe. And it says, all such unsafe buildings, structures, or service systems are hereby declared illegal and shall be abated by repair and rehabilitation or by demolition in accordance with provisions of Ordinance No. 76 -70 as amended. MR. ARNOLD: Right. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: My question is, in 76 -70 why hasn't the county gone and come up with getting the pricing or removed the structure? MS. ARNOLD: And -- and, as I answered before, the conditions of the building are such that it doesn't meet those 50 percent -- in excess of 50 percent of the entire structure, and it -- and that particular ordinance wouldn't apply. We would expect the owner to rehabilitate or repair the structure. And in this particular case, they can. If they remove the -- the roof and replace the roof on that structure, it would meet codes. MR. LEHMANN: Getting back -- go ahead. Do you want to continue? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well, I'm trying to understand why -- why we're citing for something and then -- because 76 -70 says, it would not exceed 50 percent, which you're saying this doesn't -- the county manager shall consider the following: The cost to repair, cost to demolish, the value of the property, the value of this, the value of that, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, blah. Okay. Okay? MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Schwartz, you had indicated there's a small child living there. Do you have an approximate age? MR. SCHWARTZ: Three, approximately three. MR. LEHMANN: Is this area accessible to that child? MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes, yes. It's an add -on, but it's attached to the house. MR. LEHMANN: So you would definitely consider this a safety concern for that child? Page 17 December 17, 200116J 2 MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes. MR. LEHMANN: Thank you. MS. GODFREY: Investigator Schwartz, on page 14 someone had written a letter that she has a rat infestation and flea infestation that she has done nothing about. Her water has been shut off, and she has dogs, and there's dog poop all over the place, and she also keeps a dog locked -- locked for days and that you have been aware of this some time and -- and you were supposed to give her a notice of violation, but I guess you gave her warnings; is that correct? MR. SCHWARTZ: On those vi -- I was -- I didn't notice any rat infestations or -- or anything like that. MS. GODFREY: You didn't note it. But this is, I guess, a letter from a neighbor, and also he has to listen to a level of obscenities that CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well, that wasn't written up as a violation, though. MR. SCHWARTZ: Some of those are police department matters; they're not code enforcement matters. MS. GODFREY: Yeah. There are two ongoing sheriffs office - MR. SCHWARTZ: And the water incident was a prior incident, and she applied and had the water reinstated by the utilities. So -- MS. GODFREY: Yeah. MR. PONTE: Has -- has she given you any reason for not have -- improving her own home? MR. SCHWARTZ: Monetary. MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Schwartz, you had indicated in your -- in the statement of violation that one of the sections that we were looking at here is Section 101.4.10. Is that a typographical error? Should that be 104.1.10 -- excuse me, 101.4.10? MR. SCHWARTZ: 101.4.10. December 17, 200 1 2 MR. LEHMANN: I take that back. I stand corrected. You are correct. MR. SCHWARTZ: That's okay. MR. LEHMANN: Sorry for losing my brain there for -- MR. SCHWARTZ: That's okay. MR. PONTE: Miss Rawson -- MS. RAWSON: Yes. MR. PONTE: -- I have a question for you. MS. RAWSON: Yes. MR. PONTE: If in this situation the owner doesn't have the monetary wherewithal to fix the home and there is a -- a safety hazard and there is a child present, is there a -- a department or division that can order the -- the owner to leave, it's a dangerous place for them to be? MS. RAWSON: Well, there is. But obviously that's not the power of this board. If you don't think they're going to comply, you certainly have the right to ask the county to make the repairs and, you know, charge back to the respondent. That's a better question probably for Michelle about what department is in charge of that, but it's not within the power of this board to do that. MR. PONTE: Okay. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Investigator Schwartz, you say the part that has the damaged roof, which he's now removing I think is what you said -- MR. SCHWARTZ: That's correct. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- that's the add -on. MR. SCHWARTZ: That's correct. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Are they actually living in the add -on? Could you tell? MR. SCHWARTZ: I don't know. They're using the add -on in everyday family life; I could tell that. I'.:- December 17, 2001 6 J CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MR. SCHWARTZ: But it's not a bedroom or a living room. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MR. LEHMANN: You say they are using it as a living area, consider it a living area? MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes, yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Any other questions for Mr. Schwartz? MS. GODFREY: Investigator Schwartz, on page 15 at the bottom, is that a living area, or are they just throwing stuff out in the back -- MR. SCHWARTZ: I did not take this photo. MS. GODFREY: Okay. So you have no -- MR. SCHWARTZ: I cannot answer that. MS. GODFREY: Okay. MS. DUSEK: I'm ready for a motion, Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any other questions for Mr. Schwartz? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you, sir. MR. SCHWARTZ: Okay. MS. DUSEK: Are we ready? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes, ma'am. MS. DUSEK: Okay. I make a motion that in the case of the Board of County Commissioners, Colli -- Collier County versus Bridgett L. Hendry, CEB Case No. 2001 -087, that there is a violation, and the violation is of Sections 103.5.1 and 101.4.10 of Ordinance 98 -76, the Collier County Building Administrative Code. The description of the violation is the deterioration of the roof, rear roof, fascia, and eaves of the subject building and in need of repair to the point of being unsafe and windows missing throughout. MR. LEHMANN: I'll second that violation. Page 20 December 1 7, 001 2 16J 2 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second that a violation does, in fact, exist. Any further questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Order of the board. MS. DUSEK: In looking at the order that the staff has recommended, they have given 30 days. If it's an unsafe condition, shouldn't this be handled immediately? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I would think so. It's been going on now for almost six months, and they obviously chose not to do a whole lot about it. And if we do have people living there, especially a child, I think something needs to be done immediately. MR. PONTE: And then taking Jean's train of thought, Michelle, can the county -- can -- can we, then, go ahead and make the repairs while they're living in that building? Because I -- if there is a monetary problem, which they claim to be, and they haven't made the repairs, it's for their own comfort, safety, can we go ahead and make the repairs and then bill it to them? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes. We can order that done. MS. ARNOLD: You can request the -- I feel more comfortable talking to the county attorney's office about that simply because of if they refuse to let us on their property, which they have the ability to do, we may be right back where we are right now. So I'll have to check to see with -- what we would have to obtain in terms of access to the property and those types of things prior to going in and -- and requesting a contract to go and repair a property. MR. PONTE: Is there another county department that can take cognizance of the fact that there is a safety problem here and a child Page 21 December 17, 20f (-�J � present today? MS. ARNOLD: The -- the health department is one that usually does internal inspections with respect to the safety measures and on poor conditions that may affect the family and -- and, you know, young children. I'm not aware of whether or not they have done such an inspection, but they have the ability to go in there. I'm not saying that you can't direct us to go ahead and do that, but I just wanted to -- to let you know that there may be some legal concerns that need to be cleared up with respect to the access of the property. MR. LEHMANN: Jean, does this board have the right to order another department to conduct an investigation? MS. RAWSON: No. MR. LEHMANN: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Miss Rawson -- MS. RAWSON: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- if we ordered the county to repair this building -- I think we've asked this question a couple of times before, but refresh my memory -- can they, in fact, go on somebody's property and repair it? MS. RAWSON: Well, they have the legal authority to do, but, you know, I think they do need to talk to the county attorney's office and probably are -- they're going to have to take somebody from law enforcement with them to be sure that they don't have a problem. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. I just wanted to clear up that we do have the authority to order somebody to go there and do that. How they do is -- they'll have to work out that part. I'm interested in the safety of the people there. Okay. Order of the board. MS. DUSEK: Well, I'll make a motion that the CEB order the respondent to bait -- to pay all operational costs incurred in the Page 22 December 17, 20016J 2 prosecution of this case, although I'm not sure how we -- that will come about, but -- and -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. DUSEK: -- I'm going to do this in two parts -- and make needed repairs to the roof, fascia, and windows immediately or a fine of $25 per day will be imposed each day the violation continues. In the event that this is not corrected immediately, in this motion I direct the staff, county, to go out and correct the violation. MS. ARNOLD: Can we have a -- a time? MR. PONTE: I think you have a little problem with that. Might be you tell him to do it immediately, he has to get a permit. Nothing is going to be immediate. And given the safety problem, if we could think in terms of directing the county to go in immediately and just make the repairs and then try and collect afterwards, we could do that. MS. DUSEK: Well, that's -- MR. PONTE: Money is a problem. MS. DUSEK: Money is a problem, although there was someone out there working on the property. And if this person will come in and get the permits, perhaps it can be done, but -- MR. LEHMANN: Could I offer a suggestion? MS. DUSEK: Yeah. MR. LEHMANN: We have done this many times in the past where we have ordered the respondent to secure the premises, the subject premises, from access from any person. That resolves an immediate certain concern for the child, and then we can allow them a proper time period to correct the problem. MS. DUSEK: Well, it's only part of the building. MR. LEHMANN: That's correct. MS. DUSEK: So you're saying to not give them access to that part of building. Page 23 MR. LEHMANN: That is correct. December 17, 2001 16J 2 MS. DUSEK: I don't know how you would do that. MR. PONTE: How would you enforce that? MS. DUSEK: Yes. How would you enforce that unless you have someone there 24 hours a day? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I don't see that as an enforcement solution. MS. DUSEK: No. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I think what you need to do, if you're going to order anything -- MS. DUSEK: Have the county go out. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- one, order the pros -- order them to pay the prosecutorial costs; Item 2, order the county to repair the property, period. That should be it. Any costs, including the prosecution costs, if they can't pay the costs, they will become a lien on the property, just like everything else. But, you know, since there is an unsafe condition -- and that's what the county has said -- we need to get it resolved. And it seems the only way to get it resolved is to have the county resolve the problem. It may not be the best solution, but it seems like the only solution to get it solved immediately. It's kind of hard to divide a house in half and tell somebody to stay out of it. That isn't going to happen. MS. DUSEK: Right. I think that's difficult. I was just thinking of the man who was working on the house. MS. CURATOLO: I'm not so sure I wouldn't agree with Peter since they've already started working on the house and they were told they couldn't use that area until the repairs were completed, I don't see where there's any less of a problem with that than requiring them to pay for something that they don't seem to be able to afford to pay for. MR. LEHMANN: Well, and that was my original concern, and Page 24 December 17, 2001 16J our chairman had brought it up again, it's a matter of how you enforce that. In thinking through that process, they are correct. How do you enforce that this child or the adult will not be permitted into that area? MS. DUSEK: You cant. MR. LEHMANN: You really can't. Anything that you do to barricade or -- or close up that area, unless you have somebody there 24 hours around the clock, you can't insure that they're not going to open that area to access. And it's a very valid point. Now, I would -- you know, in hindsight of what we discussed, I would support what -- what our chairman had said, in other words, order the county to do an immediate repair to the measure as opposed to -- MS. DUSEK: Giving any opportunity to the homeowner? MR. LEHMANN: Yeah, the homeowner had plenty of time to do this. My concern and apparently the board's concern, I feel, is for the child and the safety of the child and the parent. But I think at this point in time, enough time has gone by for them to do what they needed to do, and I think maybe that's what we should do is -- MS. DUSEK: Well, I will amend my motion to say that the county -- we will forget that the owners will try to remedy this problem and just have the county go out and remedy it, if they are able to do this. MS. ARNOLD: Well, my -- my request would be to give the owner some time to correct it, in light of the fact that there was somebody out there last Friday attempting to -- or last week. I don't remember what the investigator testified. But there was somebody out there last week trying to correct the problem. I think we -- we normally would give them some time. And then in the event that they don't correct it within that time frame, then the county would go in and -- Page 25 December 17, 2001 16J z MR. PONTE: But that person was stopped because he didn't have a ermit. And my concern is, if we then open up the -- the entire permitting process -- MS. ARNOLD: Uh -huh. MR. PONTE: -- we're slowing it down. Meanwhile, we still have a young child living in an unsafe condition. MS. CURATOLO: How long would the permitting process take? MS. ARNOLD: With this, I believe it's a reroof, so, I mean, they would have to -- I don't -- I'm not really sure if it's a couple weeks to submit the plans. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That's unacceptable. MS. DUSEK: Mr. Schwartz. MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes. MS. DUSEK: One more question for you. How far along was that roof process when you were out there -- well, you just were out there this morning? MR. SCHWARTZ: I was out there Thursday. MS. DUSEK: Thursday? MR. SCHWARTZ: Yes. MS. DUSEK: And how far along -- MR. SCHWARTZ: He had a -- MS. DUSEK: Was it three - quarters finished? A quarter finished? MR. SCHWARTZ: He had a good part of the roof and that -- and that part of the structure removed. MS. DUSEK: So -- but nothing had been done to actually repair it other than remove -- MR. SCHWARTZ: He was in the process of removing the roof. MS. DUSEK: Okay. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: So he still -- so he's halted because he olm December 17, 2001 16J needs a permit which still is going to take a couple weeks to get. MS. DUSEK: Right. I think in the -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: If the county has said the building is unsafe, it -- it's either unsafe or it isn't. It can't be halfway. It's one or the other. If it's unsafe, we need to get it fixed now. MS. CURATOLO: I have one other question. How do you know that they're using that area? MR. SCHWARTZ: You could see right into the area. MS. CURATOLO: And you've seen them using the area. MR. SCHWARTZ: Well, I think I've seen children in the -- a child in the area. MS. DUSEK: Miss Rawson or Michelle -- I'm not sure who can answer this -- who has the authority to say that it's unsafe and then can go ahead and do something about it? MS. RAWSON: The Department of Health, I think. MS. DUSEK: So -- MS. ARNOLD: Well, we have made the determination with the inspection from the building department. MR. LEHMANN: Just -- just for the board's knowledge, it is actually the building official who is the only person in Collier County, to my knowledge, that has the legal authority to declare a building safe or unsafe. We have testimony from the investigator that an official from the building department, a building official or an authorized representative of the building official has made that determination. So by testimony, we have a legal interpretation that the building has been declared unsafe, or at least that portion of the building, maybe not the entire building. MR. PONTE: Let me try a motion and see if we can focus on it, that the CEB direct the county to immediately repair the house, windows, the roof, and eliminate all safety hazards. Respondent is Page 27 16J 2 December 17, 2001 ordered to pay all operational costs and to reimburse the county for all costs of repairs. MR. LEHMANN: In your motion are you referring to any other portion of the house or just the portion that has -- MR. PONTE: I'm just saying generically the house, windows, roof, and eliminate all safety hazards. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We can order them to fix the part that has been cited. We can't overall repair his house, only the part that has been cited. If there are other repairs needed, until they're cited and brought before us, we can't do anything about that. MR. PONTE: Well, should we say just immediately repair the cited violations and eliminate all safety hazards? MR. LEHMANN: Again, it's the safety hazards. There could be safety hazards that exist in the main part of house that we don't know about that the violation does not address; and, therefore, we have no jurisdiction. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Right. MR. PONTE: If the safety hazards exist -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: They haven't been brought before us. MR. LEHMANN: Correct. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: So until they're brought here, you can't just give a blanket order to fix things that haven't been brought before you, even though you know about them. Unfortunately, unless they're brought here as a citation, you can't do anything about them. MR. LEHMANN: We have no evidence or testimony to indicate that there -- that they exist. We may suspect that they exist. MS. DUSEK: Let's just forget all these motions that we have and start fresh. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. DUSEK: And I'll try again. MR. PONTE: Okay. W•- � 16J 2 December 17, 2001 MS. DUSEK: I'd like to make a motion that we direct the staff, the county, to go out and bring this portion of the house to safety standards, whatever that requires, to have the owner pay the prosecution costs and any costs incurred in bringing that portion of the building up to safety standards and that this should be done immediately. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Miss Rawson, instead of the word "immediately," do we need a date? MS. RAWSON: I think so because I don't believe they're going to get up and go out right now to do it so -- MS. DUSEK: Within a week, is that possible? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Pick a date, Bobby. MS. DUSEK: Within a week. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well, we know the holidays are -- MS. DUSEK: All right. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: --next week. MS. CURATOLO: How about if we ask staff? What's realistic? MS. ARNOLD: We're going to have to get a contractor to do the work. I don't know. MS. DUSEK: Well, can we say -- MS. CURATOLO: I mean, is this any more immediate than giving them the opportunity to do the repairs over a two -week period? MR. LEHMANN: Miss Arnold, you had just said you needed to get a contractor to do this work. You do not have staff within the county that is able to repair it to the position of a safe building, not necessarily repairing everything, but just a safe building. MS. ARNOLD: No, we don't. MR. LEHMANN: So you have to go through the same process as the respondent. 16J 2 December 17, 2001 MS. ARNOLD: Yes, we do. MR. LEHMANN: Short of maybe a permitting process which you may be able to expedite. MS. DUSEK: Given that -- MR. LEHMANN: Given that idea, what is the time frame that you would expect you actually to be able to accomplish this task? MS. ARNOLD: I'm not really sure how long it's going to take. And -- and my recommendation would be to, say, as -- rather than a quick -- a specific date would be to say as quickly as possible to -- to correct the repairs, make the repairs. MS. GODFREY: Miss Arnold, do you have to get bids, being it's the county for -- MS. ARNOLD: Yes. MS. GODFREY: So that's going to take time then. MS. DUSEK: Can that portion of the building be secured somehow, boarded up or whatever so that that cannot be used? MS. ARNOLD: I -- I can't personally answer that question. I have not been out to the site. So I don't know whether or not there is a way for us to secure this portion of the building from the rest of the living area. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Miss Arnold, are you telling the board that when a problem exists in the county that needs immediate attention, they still have to go through a bidding process that take weeks, they can't resolve a problem within 24 hours? MS. ARNOLD: Yes. I can't -- I cannot take care of this problem within 24 hours. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. CURATOLO: Again, then, my question would be that if -- if there's a time frame in the process for the county to do these repairs, why wouldn't we give the individual a period of time -- MR. LEHMANN: We have. Page 30 16J 2 December 17, 2001 MR. PONTE: We've given them since July. MS. CURATOLO: I understand that. But if we say two weeks or three weeks, if he -- if they can comply within that two -week period, why wouldn't we ask them to do so as part of the motion? MS. DUSEK: I think the history of them complying speaks for itself, and we know if we ask the county to do it that it will be completed within -- if we gave them two weeks or three weeks, we know the county will do it. We don't know that the homeowner would do it, and then we'd be another three weeks behind schedule. MS. CURATOLO: I'm not saying either /or. I'm saying is it possible to -- let's say if the county comes up with a 2 1/2 -week period, if we could also build into that motion that within that period if, in fact, it was repaired, then the county would not go in and repair but -- but move along, assuming that the repairs will be done by the county? MR. LEHMANN: I think it is in -- in the motion anyway. MS. CURATOLO: Okay. MR. LEHMANN: In other words, if the penalty is ordered to repair something, goes out on site and finds out that the scope of their work is much less diminished than what it normally would have been because the respondent has already taken action ahead of them -- MS. CURATOLO: I understand what you're saying. MR. LEHMANN: -- then innate within the motion that it is taken care of. MS. CURATOLO: And I would agree with that, but I would like the individual to have something in writing stating that they could, in fact, begin the repairs and not then be responsible for the county going in. MR. LEHMANN: I don't think they need anything in writing anything more than the motion itself. They have the ability today to make those repairs. Hire a legitimate company -- Page 31 16J 2 December 17, 2001 MS. CURATOLO: And I'm saying I'd like to communicate it to them. MR. LEHMANN: Well, I -- I think the county has tried to do that in all of the notifications. If -- if you would like to make a motion to express that -- MS. DUSEK: Well, I have a motion. And unless it's not seconded, then we can move on. MR. PONTE: Before the motion -- another motion is made or amended, given that there are safety factors and there's always a range of whatever that means -- I mean, there's a safety factor, I suppose, in crossing the street. So I'm not sure what the -- I'm not sure of what the safety factors are, how severe the risk is. And if the risk is minimal, then that's something we should take cognizance of. If, however, the risk is higher, then I think in the motion we ought to request that the county contact the health department and have them look into it ASAP. But I don't know what that risk is, whether it's high or low. In -- in your view, is the risk a high -risk situation, or is it low? MR. SCHWARTZ: I think it was higher a few months ago when it was the rainy season and it was windy and parts of the roof would blow off. I don't think -- I haven't heard any more of the roof going into the neighbor's yard -- MR. PONTE: And to the child? And to the child? What's the risk to the child? MR. SCHWARTZ: Well, not being an engineer, I don't know how sound that roof is. You know, it's in need of repair, but, like I said, not being an engineer, I don't know how sound that roof really is. MS. GODFREY: Not only that, the windows -- it's going to be cold, so the -- got a cold front coming in tomorrow, so -- MR. SCHWARTZ: They have cardboard on the windows. Page 32 16J 2 December 17, 2001 MS. GODFREY: Yeah. MR. LEHMANN: Miss Dusek, you have a motion that's still on the table. Would you repeat that? MS. DUSEK: I thought you were going to ask that. It's basically saying that the -- this board directs the county to go out and make the needed repairs to bring it up to the safety standards as soon as possible and that the homeowner pay all operational costs and any costs involved in the county bringing it to its safety standards. MR. PONTE: And can we also just add that little simple declarative sentence that we direct the county to contact the health department to see if there is a health violation? MS. DUSEK: Can we do that, Jean? MS. RAWSON: You can recommend it. You can ask them, but I wouldn't put it in your order. MS. ARNOLD: We'll do that. You don't need to put it in the order. MS. DUSEK: Okay. MR. LEHMANN: I would second the motion. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: The motion carries. Next case, Board of County Commissioners versus Blocker, No. IM 2001 -02. MS. CRUZ: I believe the board has a request for a continuance on this case and the next one which involves the -- Page 33 December 17, 2001 16J CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I have not seen such a document. MS. CRUZ: If you'll give us a second, please. MS. RAWSON: Mr. Flegal, while they're -- while they're looking for the document that's the motion for continuance, I might advise the board that John Spiller, who is the attorney that represents the Blockers on both of these cases, called my office earlier in the -- last week and indicated to me that he would be here today requesting a continuance from you. He called my home last night. He's in Orlando, but he got the flu, and he couldn't drive. So he asked me to let you know that he expressed his regrets about not being able to be here today but that his intention is still to seek a continuance. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Has he, in fact, submitted a document, or do we just have the phone call? Typical Mr. Spiller. We have a motion, request from the respondents to continue. I have no problem in granting a continuance. What's the pleasure of the board? MR. PONTE: I so move we -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: How about the county? The county have a problem? MS. VIDAURI: Dora Vidaurri for the record. Good morning, board members. I'm Dora Vidaurri with the Immokalee housing project. I'm the supervisor, and I have an objection to that. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. So noted. Since the respondent's not here and their lawyer isn't here, again, I have -- MS. DUSEK: Can we ask why -- why she's objecting? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Sure. MS. VIDAURI: August of 2000 they were issued a notice of violation for this case, and we had a meeting with this property owner, and it's been since August that we tried to identify the Page 34 December 17, 200 6J problem. I'd like to see some resolution towards this case. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: August of 2000? MS. VIDAURI: One. I'm sorry, 2001. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Big difference. Okay. That's fine. Thank you. Again, under the circumstances without the respondents and 2 their attorney, having the information presented to us in preparation, I think it's in the best interest of both parties to continue this. MR. PONTE: I'll make a motion that we continue the above case. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Until our next meeting? MR. PONTE: Until the next meeting, yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. We have a motion to continue until our next meeting. MS. GODFREY: Second. MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Chairman, do we have the ability to mandate all parties will be here at the next meeting to make sure that we don't continue again? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Mandate? We have the order to subpoena them, and they will be here -- MR. LEHMANN: That's what I -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- or be in contempt. MR. LEHMANN: That's what I was referencing. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We can do that if you like. MS. DUSEK: I don't think that's necessary if they're -- if they're not willing to be here at the next case -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I suspect Mr. Spiller will be here, knowing Mr. Spiller. I suspect he will be here. Maybe his clients won't, but I'm sure he will be. Do we have a motion and a second to continue? Any further discussion? Page 35 aye. December 17, 2001 16J 2 (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All those in favor signify by saying MS. GODFREY: Aye. MR. PHILLIPS: Aye. MR. LEHMANN: Aye MR. PONTE: Aye MS. CURATOLO: Aye. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Those opposed? MS. DUSEK: No. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. We have 6 to 1. Before we get to the next case, let's take five minutes, get everybody organized. Ten minutes? THE COURT REPORTER: Please. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes, ma'am. Not a problem. (A short break was held.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. We'll call the board back to order, please. As we get started with the next case, ladies and gentlemen, whoever is going to do the presentation for both sides, you will please stand at the microphones so that you can be heard. The next case is BCC versus Manatee Resort Condominium, Case 2001 -086. MS. CRUZ: Mr. Chairman, if I may, for the record allow each respondent state their name so we know who is present and who is not. MR. WHITT: Members of the board, if I can be permitted, my name is Michael Whitt. I'm with the law firm of Becker & Poliakoff, P.A. I serve as the counsel to the Manatee Resort Condominium Association. And before we take a lot of time doing roll calls and finding out who is here, I would like to present a motion to continue this hearing Page 36 December 17, 20U1 16J P on behalf of the association which is one of the named respondents in this case. The reason for the motion to continue is that we have had subpoenas issued for a number of witnesses to appear for the respondent to present testimony before the board today. We subpoenaed a gentleman named Joe McHarris. He was served with the subpoena. However, he is out of state. I spoke with him. I released him from the subpoena for purposes of today's hearing. We do have Mr. Arnold and Mr. Mulhere who have appeared in response to the subpoena. However, we subpoenaed a gentleman named Chahram Badamtchian that worked for Collier County. I have an affidavit of service reflecting that service was made personally upon Mr. Badamtchian on December 12th, 2001, subpoenaing him for today's hearing. I'll give a copy to -- to your counsel. Interestingly, when we had these witnesses subpoenaed, we had -- and, first, issued a subpoena, which is allowed under the Rules of Civil Procedure -- attorneys at law or officers of the court are entitled to issue subpoenas. Basically makes the clerk's life a lot easier. We did that and had those subpoenas served upon these witnesses. Thereafter the county attorney's office filed an objection and motion to quash and motion for protective order and sent a letter to each of the witnesses that we had subpoenaed. I've got a letter dated December 10, 2001, that was sent via facsimile and mailed to each of the witnesses -- that was sent by Jennifer Belpedio of the Collier County Attorney's Office -- where they object both to our subpoena. We had requested that they appear for depositions so we know what their testimony would be for purposes of today's hearing and also for today's hearing. The letter states that it's Collier County's position that neither the respondent nor its attorney has the legal authority to compel you to attend the hearing on the above - referenced matter. The county will challenge the subpoena. Their challenge is that it's not lawful and Page 37 December 17, 2001 1 h� that no contempt can arise from failing to appear. After receipt of the -- I'll also give a copy to -- to counsel. I'll have these submitted for the -- for the board. In response to the letter from the county attorney, we had revised subpoenas prepared and had them issued by the clerk of the circuit court and had each one of these witnesses re- served with the new subpoena. Evidently the county took issue with the language in the earlier subpoena that said if you fail to appear, you may be held in contempt of court. I believe that's a factually and legally accurate statement. In the revised subpoena it said you were advised to -- excuse me, if you fail to appear, respondent will file a petition in the Collier County Circuit Court to enforce this subpoena and seek to hold you in contempt of court. I followed that up, then, with a letter that was personally served on each of the witnesses, including Mr. Badamtchian. This said notwithstanding the letter from the county attorney, the Collier County code specifically provides for subpoenas issued by the circuit court clerk and served by any person that's authorized by Florida law to -- to serve subpoenas, which was done, and advised them that they were required to appear for the purposes of today's hearing and, if they failed to appear, that we would file a petition against them in court, seek a court order ordering their appearance. And then, if they failed to appear, presumably the court would issue an order to show cause and hold them in contempt. Florida law clearly provides that the proceeding before the board is a quasi-judicial proceeding. In fact, the ordinance 92 -80, the Code Enforcement Board ordinance, provides in Section 8, subparagraph 4, that all testimony shall be under oath and shall be recorded. And it states that the enforcement board shall take testimony from the code enforcement official and alleged violator and from such other 2 December 17, 2016J 2 witnesses as may be called by the respective parties. As the respondent, we're put in a position with a county employee who we found out over the weekend was terminated on Friday who was subpoenaed and who is a recalcitrant witness who is obviously not even honoring the subpoena to be here today. This witness is important because under the notice of alleged violation, part of the -- the case that's being brought by the county today deals with the square footage of the unit, that it violates the county codes and that the units in question are approximately 2,000 square feet or more when the code says a maximum is 500 square feet. There is a newspaper article that appeared on Wednesday, August 29th, 2001, in which Mr. Badamtchian is quoted. He was the person that signed off on the manatee -- on the site development plan. He was the principal planner for the Collier County. He stated he was aware that the hotel rooms exceeded the maximum 500 square feet. He said his supervisors told him that he should sign off on it anyway because the county intended to amend the rules because of the demand for larger hotel rooms and, also, that the language was overlooked, that being the language in the Land Development Code concerning the square footage, was overlooked in the past for several projects. Obviously, Mr. Badamtchian is a critical witness for the respondent in this case to testify that, indeed, he knew and the county knew and the county specifically approved the site development plan, it was not a mistake, it was not an oversight, that they knew and intentionally approved the site development plan which on its face shows 2200 square feet being the square footage provided in the -- in the units. The county ordinance that provides the procedures for your hearings says that the formal rules of evidence shall not apply, but fundamental due process shall be observed. Being able to call Page 39 December 17, 20016 J 2 witnesses in response to a case where the association and the members that are the respondents, the alleged violators, that supports their case, is critical. If we cannot force witnesses to appear through subpoena power to come before you to state evidence supporting our position, there is no due process before this board. We may as well not even be here. You may as well hear from the county and what they say and that's it, because there's a lot of times that the alleged violators have no knowledge. The owners, particularly those who have come in and bought after this project was approved, they weren't involved in the approval process. They have no direct knowledge. They can't even testify before you on how this thing got approved. Now, much ado has been made about our issuance of the subpoena. And I want to bring to the board's attention Section 10 of Ordinance 92 -80. Section 10, Subparagraph 1, says every subpoena for testimony before an enforcement board shall be issued by the clerk of the circuit court as ex officio clerk to the Board of County Commissioners. It goes through what the subpoena has to contain, all of which is contained on the subpoenas that were served, the revised subpoena. And then it says, "and shall be prepared by the party requesting issuance." we're a party. We requested issuance. We prepared the subpoena. We had it issued by the clerk. It doesn't say it's issued by the Code Enforcement Board; it's issued by the clerk of the circuit court. Now, the county's position is only the board can issue subpoenas and have subpoenas served. That's not my reading of this ordinance. Subparagraph 2 goes on to allow for subpoenas for production of documentary evidence. And then you -all sit in your capacity as a quasi-judicial board. It says the enforcement board, upon motion made promptly, and, in any event, at or before the time specified in the subpoena for compliance, you may quash or modify the subpoena -M December 17, 201 6 J 2 or condition denial of the motion upon advancement by the person in whose behalf a subpoena is issued of the cost for producing the documentation. Now, I put to you, if only the board can issue subpoenas under Section 10, you can't be judge, jury, and executioner. You can't issue it, and then you cannot quash it or modify it. It doesn't make any sense. The parties have to have the right as set out under Section 10 to have the subpoenas issued by the clerk. And then in subparagraph 3 allows for the subpoenas to be served by any person authorized by law to serve process. This was served by South Florida Legal Services of Naples, a certified, state approved -- there's a statutory procedure to be a certified process server. So we have properly served Mr. Badamtchian with a subpoena. He was subpoenaed for nine o'clock. It is now approximately 10:30 a.m. Mr. Badamtchian is not here, and we move that this hearing be rescheduled for a sufficient time down the road. And I believe that's going to be at least 90 days, because to continue it to the January hearing does us no good. I have to prepare a petition and get it filed with the circuit court. I have to serve process upon Mr. Badamtchian. By law Mr. Badamtchian will have 20 days to respond, assuming, as will potentially the county, presumably there will be a motion to dismiss that will be filed that will have to be heard and resolved by the court before the court can ultimately get to the issue of was a subpoena lawfully prepared, was it lawfully served, and will we enforce the subpoena. That is going to take some time. My experience in -- in practicing law in Collier County for approximately 15 years is to get a hearing date before a circuit court judge takes approximately 45 days from the date a motion is filed, the date you seek the hearing. So I believe we're looking at a window of at least 90 days, if not more, for us to be able to force Mr. Badamtchian to come to this hearing. Page 41 December 17, 2001 1 6 J So on that basis, we would ask that the board continue the Collier County versus Manatee hearing for today. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Miss Rawson -- MS. RAWSON: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- question: In reading our ordinance for the board, 92 -80, one of the powers granted the board is subpoena powers. My take on Section 10 of the subpoena procedures would be that they are the procedures for the board's issuance of subpoenas, not for the general public's issuance of subpoenas. MS. RAWSON: Before I answer that question, let me say that the -- that's probably a response that the county attorney's office is prepared to make, because I'm sure that they anticipated this hearing and -- so I think we should probably hear from the county attorney's office, in answer to your question. I'm sure that's probably the next thing they were going to say. MS. BELPEDIO: Jennifer Belpedio, assistant county attorney with Collier County Attorney's Office. MR. LEHMANN: Excuse me, Jennifer. Would you speak up, please. Thank you. MS. BELPEDIO: Respondent -- respondent, Manatee Resort Condominium Association, issued and served subpoenas on Joe McHarris, Robert Mulhere, Chahram Badamtchian, Wayne Arnold, and Thomas Kuck for both deposition on December 12th, 2001, and appearance at hearing before the Code Enforcement Board today. We did file an objection to respondent subpoenas for depositions and attendance of witnesses at hearing, a motion for protective order, and a motion to quash process. Subsequently respondent had withdrawn his request for the subpoenas for deposition. It is our position that Florida Statute 162.08, Subsection 5, specifically and solely vests the Code Enforcement Board with the authority to subpoena alleged violators and witnesses to hearing. It Page 42 December 17, 2001 16J P %am follows that this board, the Code Enforcement Board, must be impaneled in order to make the motion -- make the decision to authorize the issuance of the subpoenas, any subpoenas. There would have to be a motion before you, a second, a majority of the members present voting, assuming a quorum in favor. It is true, as counsel pointed out, that Section 10 of the Collier County Ordinance 92 -80 -- that's the code enforcement ordinance -- outlines the specific requirements for the subpoena procedures and what must be included in the subpoenas. We're not contending that respondents are not legally permitted to have subpoenas for persons to come and attend wit -- as witnesses. We are contending the procedures in which -- or objecting to the procedures in which they are seeking to obtain these subpoenas. It is our contention that neither the chairman nor any member of the Code Enforcement Board can sign or authorize these subpoenas without the issue first being heard before the Code Enforcement Board and ruled in favor of granting the subpoenas. To not enforce this procedure would allow any respondent's attorney to come in and sign subpoenas and tell anybody to come at any time, and that person wouldn't have the opportunity to have the advanced notice and get to the hearing. I suggest that if respondents seek to move for a continuance based on the fact that Mr. Badamtchian and others are not here in that he would seek to enforce his subpoenas in circuit court, that he present the subpoenas to the Code Enforcement Board, let them make the decision, let you -all make the decision, and subpoena these persons for hearing for the next available date. I believe that that would be the most appropriate, most efficient, most economical way of accomplishing this goal to get us to where we have to be at the next hearing. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Basic question, Mr. Whitt. Page 43 December 17, 2001 16 J 2 MR. WHITT: Yes, Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Basically, you're wanting this continuance because Mr. Beldetchio (phonetic) -- is that the way you say his name? MR. WHITT: No. Badamtchian, I believe, is how you say his name. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Badamtchian. And he, from your standpoint, would present evidence dealing with the square footage of the rooms; is that what you're telling us? MR. WHITT: Correct. And let me note for the record, too, that there was another gentleman, Mr. Kuck, K- u -c -k, that was also subpoenaed that has failed to appear. He is the gentleman that actually sent the letter from the county approving the site development plan. Mr. Badamtchian was the planner who reviewed it and approved it, and Mr. Kuck was the person from the county who had to sign the letter that said your site development plan has been approved. Both of those gentlemen -- MR. WHITE: Mr. Chairman, if I may object, just one piece of information, just put on the record. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Let him finish, and then we'll hear from your side. We're not going to get into any big, fancy arguments. Let's hear from one side first. MR. WHITT: I just did not note that Mr. Kuck is not here today, so I wanted the record to reflect that. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That's fine. MR. WHITT: If I understand the county's position, they say that they will stipulate to continue this hearing for the board, then, to issue the subpoenas or direct the subpoenas be issued by -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I don't know. I'm going to get to that. My question to you was about Mr. Badamtchian and square footage; that's why you wanted him here. 99-M. i December 17, 200116J MR. WHITT: Yes. � CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes or no? MR. WHITT: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That was my question. MR. WHITT: And -- and other issues. We're not quite sure what the county's going to put on -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I understand. MR. WHITT: -- but, also, to -- to address those issues dealing with the submittal of the site development plan and the review process and the ultimate approval of that and the issuance of the permit to construct Manatee Resort. That would be the nature of his testimony. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Now the county's objection. MR. WHITE: If I may, Mr. Chairman -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Name. MR. WHITE: -- small factual matter. Alain, Patrick White, assistant county attorney. Mr. Whitt had told you that Mr. Kuck's the one that signed the SDP approval letter when, in fact, it was not Mr. Kuck. And I just wanted to make sure that that was clearly in the record. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Thank you, sir. MR. LEHMANN: Miss Rawson -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Go ahead. MR. LEHMANN: Miss Rawson, may I ask a question? MS. RAWSON: Sure. MR. LEHMANN: We have two sections -- two sections noted, both Ordinance 92 -80 and Florida Statutes 162 which govern this board. What is your take or your interpretation of Section 10 of dash -- of Ordinance 92 -80 with regard to subpoena? MS. RAWSON: Well, I'll be happy to tell you what I think. However, I don't wear the black robe. Page 45 December 17, 200 16J 2 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That's okay. We trust your judgment. MS. RAWSON: The -- the two attorneys have both made very good arguments, but neither of them has cited any case law for me to look up. I am aware what the problem is. I can tell you, based on my experience, by being the attorney for the Code Enforcement Board and also by being a member of the board for years before that, that there have been other occasions where witnesses have been subpoenaed and they were not subpoenaed by the board. They were subpoenaed in the same way that Mr. Whitt did; he had the clerk issue the subpoena. This is the first time in -- at least in my history that I know that this particular issue has come up as to whether or not you, in fact, have to authorize the issuance of the subpoena or whether they can do -- as Mr. Whitt says, have the requesting party go to the clerk's office and have the subpoena issued. I think that this is a serious - enough legal issue that I would agree with what I think I heard both attorneys say, and that is let someone who does wear the black robe make that call. MR. WHITE: Mr. Chairman -- MR. LEHMANN: Just one second -- go ahead. MR. WHITE: I was going to point out that I believe it's the county's position that if they would like the subpoenas issued, we're not going to object to them so long as they otherwise comply with the law, i.e., they ask this board for those subpoenas today. We don't believe it's necessary to go to court on the matter, but if -- if that's what's required, certainly the county will do so. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Let's -- let me first back up and let's get to a basic question before we get to the subpoenas. They want a motion to continue. Tell me the county's position. Yes or no to agree to the continuance? MR. WHITE: I believe we're ready to prosecute today -- the Page 46 D case today, sir. December 17, 200 6J 2 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. I want -- that's what I wanted to hear so -- did you have a question? MR. LEHMANN: Yes. Miss Rawson, I'm referring to Ordinance 92 -80, Section 10, paragraph 1. MS. RAWSON: Correct. MR. LEHMANN: The -- the section references -- and I will read -- every subpoena from testimony -- every subpoena for testimony before an enforcement board shall be issued by the clerk of the circuit court as ex officio clerk of the board of county commissioners under the seal of Collier County. My question to you is, does that text apply to this specific board, and does that text make the clerk of the county court, in essence, the authority to issue a subpoena for ourselves or possibly a respondent? MS. RAWSON: Well, I think clearly the clerk can issue the subpoena, no question about that. MR. LEHMANN: Uh -huh. MS. RAWSON: I think that the county's position -- and they can correct me if I'm misstating their position -- is that because it follows up -- Section 10 follows Section 9. And Section 9 is the section that gives you subpoena power. And since it's the very next section, I think their interpretation is, well, you have subpoena power and this is the way you do it; whereas I think Mr. Whitt's position is Section 10 is read independently and clearly says that the subpoena shall be prepared by the party requesting issuance. Honestly, I don't know that this issue has ever come up before, and I don't know whether you have to authorize the issuance of the subpoena and then the clerk actually issues it or whether the respondent has the right to go, as long as he gives notice to everybody and have it issued by the clerk. My -- my major concern always is that everybody receive due Page 47 December 17, 2001 16J 2. process and that every party presenting their case before you have the right to have all the necessary witnesses that are relevant to his or her case present evidence. I wouldn't want to see you forge ahead and close the hearing without having given the opportunity for the respondent to get all the necessary witnesses here to testify so that you've got a full and complete picture before you make a decision. Now, how we get those witnesses here is the procedural issue that probably we need a legal interpretation on. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have no guarantee, if we continue this case to a later date, that these people will even show up. MS. RAWSON: That's always the case in court proceedings. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes. MS. RAWSON: That's correct. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: It's no different than it is today. He's not here, and there's no way to guarantee he's going to be here next time. MS. RAWSON: There's never a way to guarantee that he's going to be here. But I think, if I understood Mr. Whitt, what he said to you is that he would like the opportunity to go to the court to issue -- to have him show cause why he shouldn't be held in contempt for not having appeared here pursuant to subpoena, anticipating that the county will then come in and say, well, you didn't have the right to, you know, issue the subpoena, and then a court of law is going to make a determination about how the subpoena should have, should not have been issued and try to force the appearance of the necessary witness. MR. WHITT: If -- if at this point I can -- can clarify our position or -- based upon what the county has stated, we're not itching to be a test case. I don't want to take the money from these good people to have to go into court and pursue a petition to get a court order compelling them to appear. And possibly this may be a way to !M December 17, 2001 16J � resolve the issue. We're amenable to continue this hearing to your next hearing date. We'll now move this board for an order directing that the subpoenas be issued in the appropriate form for the witnesses that we seek to have present for our case. We'll then serve those subpoenas, which I think addresses the concern and the objection of the county that you -all have to give it your blessing for the subpoenas to be proper. That's fine. At the next hearing if the witnesses are here, we'll be ready to proceed. If the witnesses are not here, we will again move this board to continue the hearing. We're not going to have, then, the procedural issue with respect to the ordinance on who can and who cannot issue the subpoenas. Clearly, then, we'll have a witness who is not honoring a subpoena issued by you or directed to be issued by you and issued by the clerk and properly served upon that witness. Then, in that event, I'll file a petition in circuit court. And there is a way to ensure that that witness will appear before this board, and it's called a contempt proceeding and a writ of bodily attachment. If the judge finds someone in contempt of court for not honoring a subpoena, that person can be arrested. They can be held, and they can come in here with an orange suit on and handcuffs and stand where I'm standing to be questioned by the respondents in this case. So eventually we will have the witnesses before this board that we need. It just may be a long, tedious process to get there. But it may not. Next month they may honor the subpoena, and this may all become moot. And someone else can fight another day about the procedures and who can have the subpoenas issued. MS. DUSEK: I have a question for you. You subpoenaed I don't know how many people, but there are two that you subpoenaed who are not here? MR. WHITT: That is correct. We subpoenaed five witnesses. One is out of state. Two are present, and two have not responded. -M December 17, 20016 J 2 MS. DUSEK: All right. Now -- MR. WHITT: Have not responded to inquiries trying to contact them. Now I understand why with at least one of them. MS. DUSEK: My question, I guess, to our counsel is next -- let's say we continue it to next month. Now, the two that were not here today show up, two others don't, and this could go on forever. MS. RAWSON: Well, I think at that point in time the respondent's attorneys will have to determine whether or not they are willing to proceed without the other witnesses, who's really essential to their case. I mean, those are decisions that -- that I can't make for them, and I don't really know because you haven't heard the evidence. But, you know, the attorneys for the respective sides of this case know very well who they think is truly necessary to give testimony to you so that you get the complete picture. A lot of times in trial we'll subpoena more witnesses than we need, and we'll make a determination at the last minute if we're ready to proceed without a couple that are less essential than the ones that are there. So they'll have to make that call. MS. DUSEK: I still have a couple of more questions. If -- if that case happens, if we give a continuance to next month and the two that aren't here today show up and there are two that don't, then the attorney will say, well, those other two are very important to the case and we continue it another month and then it goes back and forth, who is important. Also, that's a concern of mine. Also, if -- MS. RAWSON: You'll have the same decision next month that you would have today. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Right. MS. RAWSON: And that is whether to grant it. MS. DUSEK: Yes, I understand. Also, with the scenario of finding them in contempt of court if they don't show up and if they do come here in an orange shoot -- suit, they still don't have to answer Page 50 J questions; is that correct? December 17, 200 6 MS. RAWSON: No, that's not correct. They do have to answer questions. MS. DUSEK: Okay. MR. PONTE: I'm a little concerned with the timetable, the protracted timetable, given that some of these witnesses may not be full -time residents and they return north in March, which is less than 90 days from now, it just seems -- unless we can get a statement from the witnesses or if we can hear the witnesses that are here, is that possible, get a written statement or hear them? MS. RAWSON: Well, you can do an evidence deposition, but there are other ways to present testimony to boards other than -- it's not a written statement. What it is is an evidence deposition where the county attorney is also present. Questions are asked, and everybody knows it's an evidence deposition because they won't really be here. You have an opportunity to read the deposition in advance, so there are other ways to do it. MR. WHITT: If I could make -- make two points. First -- and I guess to address Miss -- is it Dusek? MS. DUSEK: Yes. MR. WHITT: -- your -- your concerns. If you order the subpoena to be issued, then it's, in effect, your subpoena. And I would think that this board had -- would have some concern with respect to its powers in enforcing the codes of Collier County that when you issue a subpoena and it's properly served that the witness is going to appear before you. That's very important for due process. That's very important to get to the truth. And, second, again, to allay your fear of if they show up and they don't show up and who's important -- and I'll note, as I said earlier, Joe McHarris, I was able to make contact with him. And instead of moving to continue because he was out of town, I Page 51 December 17, 20 determined that at least with what I know today about the county's case, his testimony was not really important enough for me to come in and seek a continuance because he was out of town and could not honor the subpoena for today, okay. And we will make good -faith efforts to make that determination. For the first time I've been able to speak to a couple of the other witnesses. I'll talk with them again, and we'll make a determination: Is it important enough for them to be here? These two that aren't here, they're the important ones out of the five. So we would ask that you -all enter an order allowing the subpoenas to be issued. Again, let's say for the five, and then we'll make the determination with respect to who we feel we may need, if we need those other three. And we'll have those reissued by the clerk. We'll have the third subpoena served on these people for the new date, and we'll put off that issue of whether or not we end up having to go to circuit court for another day. And if they're here, we'll be ready to go at the next hearing, when all of the owners presumably or at least the majority of them will still be here. It is still in season. MR. WHITE: If I may, Mr. Chairman, just to clarify that those subpoenas that are being requested, if Mr. Whitt could specify to the board whether they're for both deposition and hearing. My reason for bringing this to your attention is that if they are as well for the depositions, then, perhaps, similar to today, having had an opportunity to discuss whatever it is that they believe they need to bring into evidence in their case, they'll be able to do so at deposition. They'll also at that point in time know whether the subpoenas lawfully issued through this board by the clerk are going to be honored or not, and that way they'll have a good -faith determination of whether those same witnesses will likely attend at hearing the next time we convene for this matter. Page 52 December 17, 200 1 L j 03 MR. WHITT: We're happy to do that, to subpoena them for deposition as well as the hearing, and then we can either present the deposition testimony if you feel that is sufficient. We may not even need them for the hearing, although we -- although we might. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Miss Rawson, question: Procedural, I guess. The witnesses, since there's two of them, that aren't here, the alleged violations cover six sections of various ordinances. Based on what Mr. Whitt has said leads me to believe that these witnesses are limited in scope, by his admission. Could we proceed with the case and when we get to whatever point where now we need these people to cover whatever areas, at that point we then continue the case to the next meeting and get these people here? MS. RAWSON: Well, obviously, you as a board can do whatever you please. Procedurally, I would rather see you, if you -- if you're inclined to proceed with the case and then break for a continuance, I would rather see you, first of all, do as both attorneys have stipulated, issue the subpoenas so we get that out of the way. If you intend to go forward with the case today, then let the county present its case, and that -- at that point stop the proceedings so that the respondent can have his own day and his own -- get his witnesses here rather than stop in the middle of his case. Now, you may or may not want to do that because if you wait another 90 days to finish this case, you have to remember -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yeah. MS. RAWSON: -- what happened today. Now, I know we'll have the court reporter's notes. You'll have to refresh your memory. I think if you're going to issue the subpoenas today, it probably is also a good idea to issue the subpoenas for the depositions. It might save you a lot of time in the future if both attorneys could sit down with these witnesses at a deposition and find out exactly what the testimony is going to be. It's been my experience as a litigator for Page 53 December 17, 20011 0� i a 24 years that depositions aid everybody but mostly the fact finder because we save you a lot of time. Lots of times after depositions cases end up getting settled, too, not that I know that's going to happen in this case. But the -- the actual evidence that might have to be presented to you might be a lot less if there's depositions first. MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Whitt, you were asking for a 90 -day continuance or 30 -day? MR. WHITT: No. At this point, based on the county's position, I believe a 30 -day continuance to your next hearing is sufficient, presuming we can schedule the depositions, which I believe really shouldn't be that -- that much of a problem, and -- and have that witness appear at the next hearing. It's after that, the -- the need for a longer span of time is if we have to go to court to enforce the subpoenas, okay. The legal system does not move that quickly. We'll press it forward as quickly as we can. It just doesn't move that -- that quickly. But it all may become moot if these witnesses appear for the next regularly scheduled meeting; then we're ready to go at that time. MR. PONTE: The next meeting is January 24th. Is that a comfortable date? MR. WHITT: That's comfortable with me. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Let me ask a question because it's a road I want to explore so that we can move on, and I'll ask the county first. The subpoena issue aside, because I think we're going to handle that, what would the county's objection be, or is there one, if we were to proceed with the case today and let the county do its side totally and then continue to next month and let the respondent do his side? MS. BELPEDIO: We would prefer to try the case in its entirety. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. BELPEDIO: And, therefore, put off the court date, the Page 54 December 17, 200116 2 hearing until the next, if -- if we are even continuing. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. DUSEK: Miss Rawson, I have a question. We can accept depositions. We don't have to have the witness here; is that correct? MS. RAWSON: It depends. If it's an evidence deposition or if it's a deposition just for discovery purposes and then, of course, the witness still appears. Attorneys do depositions sometimes just to discover what the witness is going to say at the trial. And I believe that these were discovery depositions that were requested initially. You just want to know what the witness is going to say before they say it. In some instances, we use evidence depositions when people are out of town or it would be impossible for them to be in front of you on the day of the hearing. In that case the sides usually would stipulate and agree that it's an evidence deposition, and it is the same as if the testimony is presented to you live. Now, I don't want to speak for either one of these attorneys. I have no idea whether they are -- intend to do discovery depositions or if they intend to present to you evidence depositions. That's their call, but that's the difference. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yeah. At the same time we have to remember that whatever the deposition is, if the board comes up with a question and that person isn't here, we have no way to get the answer. MS. RAWSON: That is correct. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Because -- MS. RAWSON: It -- it -- it's different if we had a judge than if we have all seven of you sitting there because, you know, according to the county ordinance, you have the right to ask the witnesses questions, and all of you do. If you are -- have an evidence deposition and all you have is the transcript, you're not able to do that. Mr. Flegal is -- is correct. Page 55 December 17, 200116 J 2 MS. DUSEK: Now, another question: If we give the okay for the subpoenas, if we vote yes, go through with your subpoenas, and next month those witnesses -- some of them don't show up and they've been subpoenaed, does that mean that we automatically then have to follow taking them to court -- not us, but the attorneys, filing in court for contempt of court or whatever procedure they have to follow? Does it automatically follow that? MS. RAWSON: It's not automatic, No. MS. DUSEK: Or could we say, well, we've given you 30 days, your witnesses didn't show up, we're going to hear the case then? MS. RAWSON: It's basically if you issue the subpoena, it's going to be your call whether or not you're going to be offended because they didn't come when you subpoenaed them. MS. DUSEK: So we do have the opportunity to say -- MS. RAWSON: Sure. MS. DUSEK: -- if they aren't here, we can go ahead with the case. MS. RAWSON: It will be your decision. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Let's do it. One at a time, the first item being, does the board want to issue -- order the issuance of subpoenas for -- and you'll have to give me the names of how many ever people are involved. And, Miss Rawson, what else did we want, the depositions to be included? Was that the other item? MS. RAWSON: Well, that's up to the attorneys. I -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. RAWSON: If they want the depositions included, I don't have a problem with it. MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Chairman, should we vote first on whether or not to grant a continuance? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well, let's first issue the subpoenas, get that over with. Then we'll decide if we're going to let it continue. Page 56 December 17, 200116 i em MR. LEHMANN: If we do not issue a continuance and hear the case, what is the good of the subpoenas? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well, I'm basing this on the fact that the county says they want to do everything together, and it seems the respondent is -- says this is very pertinent to his case. So I'm trying to, I guess, give everybody the -- the best rights they have. It looks like we're -- I don't know any way to say it but straight out. There's not a lot of choice in granting this continuance. Due process, I think, would probably be amiss and -- which would make it possibly subject to appeal. So we're -- we're -- I'm not saying we're backed into a corner, but I think in all due judgment, we're probably better off to wait another 30 days. MR. LEHMANN: I was just bringing up a point of order. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. I mean, that's the way I thought I'd just go about it. I don't have any objection to doing it the other way. MR. WHITE: If it would be helpful, Mr. Chairman, the county would stipulate to the witnesses and to the depositions or to the deponents that the respondent's attorney would request. MR. LEHMANN: Would you repeat that, sir. MS. DUSEK: I didn't follow that. MR. WHITE: We're going to stipulate to whoever they ask. MS. DUSEK: I'm sorry? MR. WHITE: We'll stipulate to whoever it is they ask for -- MS. DUSEK: Okay. MR. WHITE: -- both with respect to depositions and hearing. MR. LEHMANN: One last question, Mr. Chairman. Are you considering subpoenas for solely these five witnesses they had spoken of earlier, or are you considering subpoenas of the property owners as well? Make sure that all parties are here? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: They haven't asked -- they haven't Page 57 December 17, 16J 2 issued, to my knowledge, subpoenas and haven't asked for subpoenas for the property owners. I don't know that this board needs the property owners -- off the top of my head, I think from their case the respondents want these five people. I don't see the need for the board to ask for subpoenas for anybody else at this time. MS. DUSEK: I would agree with that. MR. LEHMANN: Just clarification. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I think the subpoenas should be for all five, not for the two that didn't show up. That way they're all on notice, and if they don't show up, then we don't have this problem next time. MR. WHITE: That's precise. I'm sorry, Mr. Chairman. That's precisely the point we were discussing with MS. Arnold. And kind of to get back to where we started from when MS. Cruz was looking to take the roll of respondents, if we can have that and have them state on the record that they'll waive notice, they'll certainly save the county the time and expense of having to individually mail them again another notice of the continuance of this hearing, and we'll only deal with those folks who are, quote, not present today as respondents. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: As to that standpoint, when we get to that stage, I would agree with that on the notice. So let's -- let's take up the subpoena first. MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Chairman, my only concern is that we've continued this case twice already. I don't relish the -- the idea of continuing it again today, if we can take whatever action that is within our power to try to ensure that that we can actually hear the case under due process, and I think that we should do that, whatever those actions may be. MS. DUSEK: Did I understand you to say that you do not want to continue the case? December 17, 2001 1 2 MR. LEHMANN: No. I said that I -- I said that we have already granted -- MS. DUSEK: Yes. MR. LEHMANN: -- a continuance already before coming here today. Respondents have requested another continuance, so this -- if we grant this continuance, it would be the second time. I would actually like to hear this case and get it taken care of so that whatever we do today, I would request that the board -- that we take whatever action would be necessary to try to ensure to the greatest ability that we have all parties here so that we could actually conduct a hearing the next time. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MR. LEHMANN: I know we don't have assurances, but we take the appropriate procedures that we can. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: If we issue subpoenas for these five people, if my understanding is correct -- Miss Rawson can correct me -- next meeting if these five people, one or all, are not here, we can then make the determination to proceed. If the respondents' attorneys object, we can make note of that and proceed anyway. That's our deal because they're our subpoenas. Is that right, Miss Rawson? MS. RAWSON: That's correct. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: So we have assurances that if we issue these requests for subpoenas and grant a continuance that at our next meeting, should one or all fail to be here, we can then hear the respondents' motion to do whatever and at that time say, "Sorry. We're going to do it today, and that's the way it is." does that satisfy you? MR. LEHMANN: Yes, sir. MS. DUSEK: I like that. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Back to -- I guess what we need is a motion for the issuance of subpoenas for whatever these Page 59 December 17, 2001 16J 2 five names are; is that correct, Miss Rawson? MS. RAWSON: That's correct. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Bobby. MS. DUSEK: I make a motion that we ask for subpoenas of the five people that the respondent has mentioned in their case. MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Whitt, for -- for the record, would you please state the names of the five people and any other pertinent information that the county or the clerk would need to fill those subpoena requests? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Do you need more than just their appearance, sir? Do you want depositions? MR. WHITT: Yes, we would like depositions. MS. DUSEK: I include with that motion depositions. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: What type depositions? MR. WHITT: Discovery depositions. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. DUSEK: All right. I include that in the motion. MR. WHITT: First would be Joe McHarris, M- c- H- a- r- r -i -s; next, Thomas Kuck, K- u -c -k; Bob Mulhere, M- u- 1- h- e -r -e; Wayne Arnold, A- r- n- o -1 -d; and Chahram -- I'll spell the first name too -- C-h-a-h-r-a-m, Badamtchian, B- a- d- a- m- t- c- h- i -a -n. MR. LEHMANN: And you will provide whatever pertinent information the clerk needs to fill those subpoenas? MR. WHITT: Yes. We will prepare the subpoenas and have them delivered to the clerk for issuance and service -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MR. WHITT: -- upon the five witnesses. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion that subpoenas be issued for these five people's presence and discovery depositions. Do I hear a second? MR. PONTE: I'll second. December 17, 2001 1 2 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second. Any further question? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Those opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: The motion carries. MS. DUSEK: I also make a motion that we continue the case to our next meeting. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion to grant a continuance to our next meeting which is January -- MR. PONTE: 24th. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- 24th. Do I hear a second? MR. PONTE: I'll second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second to grant a continuance to our next meeting of January 24th. All those in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Those opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That closes our public hearings. MS. CRUZ: Do they waive -- waive notice? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes. I'd like the respondents' attorneys to waive notice so that we can speed up the process. MR. LEHMANN: Do we need to open the hearing again? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: No. MR. WHITT: On behalf of the condominium association, as their counsel, we will waive notice. We, however, do not represent the other respondents, the individual respondents. So I believe that's why they had requested a roll call, for that purpose. December 17, 2001 16J 2 MR. LEHMANN: If you have respondents that are present, may we ask that they either waive or do not waive at this point in time? MR. WHITT: We do not represent them. On behalf of the association, our client, we do waive. Those individual owners that are here, you'll need to do roll call and -- and get their waiver. MR. LEHMANN: Jean, do we have that right to do that? MS. RAWSON: Yes. MR. LEHMANN: Okay. Miss -- Miss Arnold, would do you a roll call or somebody do a roll call. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: How many respondents are here? Let me ask that question, please. MS. ARNOLD: If they could just one by one get up here. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yeah. It would be easier than calling the roll. If you could come up one at a time, just give us your name, and we'll check it off. What we're asking you to do, rather than the county mail you another letter saying we're going to have a hearing January 24th of 2002, since you're here, you're now understanding that we're going to have that hearing, and you're accepting that as notice. That's what we're -- all we're asking you to do, nothing else. Yeah. Just in case, please spell your name so the court reporter can have it. MR. NADER: I'm Fredrick Nader, N- a- d -e -r, and I agree. MR. DEVORE: Jim Devore, D- e- v- o -r -e, and I waive the right of notice. MR. PALLADINO: Anthony Palladino, P- a- 1- 1- a- d- i -n -o. I'll be here. MR. SMITH: Joseph Smith. I waive the right. MR. SMITH: Peter Smith, S- m- i -t -h, and I waive notice. MR. ALLEN: Jim Allen, A- 1- 1 -e -n. MR. GAVIN: Daniel Gavin, G- a- v -i -n. I agree. MS. GAVIN: Diane Gavin, G- a- v -i -n. I agree. Page 62 16J 2 December 17, 2001 MS. ROTH: Edna Roth, R- o -t -h. I agree. MR. MASSEY: Robert Massey, M- a- s- s -e -y. I agree. MR. PETITTI: Cecil Petitti, P- e- t- i- t -t -i. I agree. MR. GODE: Larry Gode, G- o -d -e. I agree. MR. CLEYN: Frank Cleyn, C- 1- e -y -n. I agree. MR. ALDERMAN: Gary Alderman, A- 1- d- e- r- m -a -n. I agree. MR. HILLMAN: Richard Hillman, H- i- 1- 1- m -a -n, representing Gail Hillman. I agree. MR. COWELL: Charles Cowell, representing my wife Carol. I agree. THE COURT REPORTER: Spell your name, please. MR. COWELL: C- o- w- e -1 -1. THE COURT REPORTER: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you very much, ladies and gentlemen. Next item, new business, request for imposition of fines. MS. RAWSON: Before we get there, Mr. Chairman, I just want the county attorney's office to -- to note that all of the people that are respondents did not respond to the roll call, so there might be some notices we have to send. MS. ARNOLD: Yes. We are aware of that. MR. WHITT: May I inquire? Will that be at nine o'clock? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes, sir. Nine o'clock in the morning in this room. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Let's see. These belong to Jennifer. Okay. MS. ARNOLD: Okay. For the record, Michelle Arnold, code enforcement director. The first case that is on your agenda for imposition of fines is Board of County Commissioners versus Wendell L. Kramer, Salvator F. Angileri, and Salvator Crech. This case was heard by the board on August 23rd. At that time Page 63 16J 2 December 17, 2001 the board found the respondents in violation and ordered them to correct the violation by replacing all the dead vegetation and hydroseeding the retention area and maintain the vegetation in perpetuity. They ordered the respondent to do so by November 23rd, 2001, or fines of $50 per day would be imposed. They also ordered that the respondent pay operational costs. We are at this time entering in the affidavit of noncompliance and ask that the board impose fines in the amount of $850 for the period reflecting November 23rd through December 10th, 2001, plus costs for $483.30. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. We have a request for the imposition of fines. Do I hear a motion? MS. DUSEK: I make a motion. MR. LEHMANN: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and second to impose the fines as requested. All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) MS. ARNOLD: I -- I just wanted to note for the record that the -- Mr. Angileri and Mr. Salvator are present. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. ARNOLD: Do you want to proceed? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes. MS. ARNOLD: Okay. The next case is Board of County Commissioners versus Ricky L. Bell. That was Case No. 2001 -078. The case was heard on September 27, 2001. At that time the board found there to be a violation and ordered the respondent to come into compliance by November 27th. Mr. Bell was at your last hearing and requested a continuance. The board did not grant that ex -- extension of compliance. And at 163 Z December 17, 2001 this time we are requesting that the board impose fines in the amount of $325 for the period reflecting November 23rd, 2001, through December 10th, 2001, and an additional $425.02 for costs. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a request for the imposition of fines against Mr. Bell. MR. PONTE: So moved. MS. GODFREY: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second to impose such fines. All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Next. MS. ARNOLD: The next is Board of County Commissioners versus Sidney John Hubschman, Case No. 2001 -080. This case was heard before the board on October 25th, and the respondent was found in violation. The board ordered that the respondent remove all prohibited exotics within 21 days or by November 16th, 2001. The board further ordered that the respondent pay fines in the amount of $50 per day in the event that they did not remove vegetation by November 16th and ordered the respondent to pay operational costs. Staff is now entering in the affidavit of noncompliance and request that the board impose fines in the amount of $1,250 for the period reflecting November 17th through December 10th and an additional $325.20 for operational costs. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a request for the imposition of fines for Mr. Hubschman. Do I hear a motion? MR. LEHMANN: So moved. MS. DUSEK: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second. All Page 65 16J .� December 17, 2001 in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Fine. Old business. MS. ARNOLD: We have no old business. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Do we have the rules and regulations? MS. ARNOLD: Yes. We -- we have them here to be signed. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That's what we need. Have they been approved by us, but we need to sign them? MS. ARNOLD: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: If you bring them to us, please, we'll sign them. Since we have seven people here, let's accomplish that. MR. PONTE: Just sort of as an aside while we're waiting for that, is there any way we can take -- I feel like a traffic cop here. We've continued the Blocker case. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Right. MR. PONTE: And that -- to the next session. And we've continued the Manatee case. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Right. MR. PONTE: Until the next section. Both of them are pretty hefty. Is there any way we can say, all right, maybe we'll continue the Blocker case to February? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well, we've done that once, and he had a request for a continuance. Unless they request for a continuance, I don't see us just automatically moving it out. We -- we granted a continuance until the next meeting. I think at this point we have to -- MR. PONTE: Blocker wasn't here, was he? MS. RAWSON: Mr. Ponte, I do -- I do appreciate your concern, and I will tell the board that Mr. Spiller indicated to me last week W- M. 16.1 2 December 17, 2001 when he called and told me he was making this request that he thought it was a three- or four -hour hearing. MR. PONTE: I think we have to take some notice of that. MS. RAWSON: Well, we thought today was going to be a three- or four -hour hearing too. MR. PONTE: Next time it will be. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Blased on -- based on Mr. Blocker's letter, which he seems to think that the case shouldn't even be here, I think at this point we need to let him do his next thing, whatever that may be, come to this board and either request that it be thrown out, continued, or whatever, rather than just automatically say, oh, by the way, we're going to give you an extra 30 days. I understand your concern, but I think at this point we have to accept that. The only other thing that might be done is since those two cases -- three cases, really, are there, maybe staff could see that that might be the only three cases on our agenda for our next meeting rather than -- MS. ARNOLD: Putting any more. Sure, that would be no problem. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That would help. And that way if -- because I suspect the Manatee will probably be a -- long and drawn out. So if Blocker goes, we'll probably need most of the day, so I think staff could help us from that standpoint. MS. DUSEK: Also, I just wanted to say that this is an awful lot of material. And unless there's some addition to it, shouldn't we just save what you've given us? MS. ARNOLD: Please do. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Rather than have it recopied, I think everybody just hang onto it, read through it like you've been doing. MS. DUSEK: Unless there's something different that needs to be added, we'll just -- MS. ARNOLD: Right. What we'll be sending to you with Page 67 16J 2 December 17, 2001 respect to the Manatee case is all the notice of hearing that we sent out for all the property owners that weren't present today and then if there is any additional information -- we'll probably send a notice of hearing, since Mr. Spiller wasn't here to waive those -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Right. MS. ARNOLD: -- that hearing notice. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: And if the county gets any -- MS. ARNOLD: Additional packets. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- depositions or whatever from the other side or if they get anything, we'd like those, in accordance with our rules and regulations, before the meeting. Otherwise we're going to have to take time out and read through all that. And if they get five depositions, that's not a five - minute deal so -- MS. RAWSON: You know, interesting about the depositions, I believe you said there were going to be -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Discovery depositions. MS. RAWSON: -- just discovery depositions. And if they're going to be given to you, then it would be up to the respondent's attorney to submit them in his packet, which he has to do ten days before. MS. ARNOLD: Right. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Right. Any reports of any type, Michelle? MS. ARNOLD: No. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Comments? Next meeting is January 24th. MR. LEHMANN: Michelle, are we making any progress on workshops that we talked about? MS. RAWSON: How about January 24th? MR. PONTE: Yeah. MR. LEHMANN: Only if you can reserve the room for the 16J 2 December 17, 2001 evening. MS. ARNOLD: We -- we're trying to come up with dates, and it's up to the board whether or not they want to have all the workshops held in this room or other -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That's not required, is it, Michelle? MS. ARNOLD: No, it's not. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. ARNOLD: And if you -all could pass suggestions with respect to what you want to be -- what to be informed upon at the workshops, we could do that as well. And then I can better schedule workshops for you. MR. LEHMANN: Is it required to have -- excuse me. The workshops are open to the public. Is it required to have audio /visual feed into those workshops? Can we do it in any room? MS. ARNOLD: Yeah. You can do it anywhere. MR. LEHMANN: Okay. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: No other business? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Everybody have a merry Christmas and happy new year. I'll take a motion to adjourn. MR. LEHMANN: So moved. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion. Do I hear a second? aye. MR. PONTE: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All those in favor signify by saying (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you very much. Page 69 16J 2 December 17, 2001 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 11:21 a.m. CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD CLIFFORD FICEGAL, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF DONOVAN COURT REPORTING, INC., BY BARBARA A. DONOVAN, RMR, CRR CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORLDA ✓/�J A G E N D A G Date: November 29, 2001 at 9:00 o'clock A.M. 6� Location: 3301 E. Tamiami Tr., Naples, Florida, Collier County Government Center, Administrative Bldg, 3rd Floor NOTE: ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. NEITHER COLLIER COUNTY NOR THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING THIS RECORD. 1. ROLL CALL Fiala 2. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Curter 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES October 25, 2001 Henning 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS Coyle Coletta ( / A. BCC vs. Saintilien Occeus and Malveilleas Estiverne 81 B. BCC vs. Bonnie L. Harrod CEB No. 2001 -082 C. BCC vs. Gerald Martin Dwyer CEB No. 2001 -083 D. BCC vs. Eric B. Bertelsen CEB No. 2001 -084 f E. BCC vs. Wayne Simpson and Lester Redmond CEB No. 2001 -085 } >i F. BCC vs. MANATEE RESORT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., ATTN. JIM ALLEN, RA. MANATEE RESORT CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, INC., ATTN. AUSTIN WHITE, ATTY JOSEPH T. AND JANET C. SMITH PETER G. AND DEBORAH K. SMITH JAMES D. ALLEN, JR., EDNA ROTH CECIL J. AND SHARON K. PETITTI, II ANTHONY P. AND LYNN R. PALLADINO DANIEL J. AND DIANE R. GAVIN EITHNE FULTON, CYRIL E. FULTON GORDON E. ENS AND CAROL J. DORMER JAMES R. AND JOAN M. DEVORE 171625 CANADA, INC., WILLIAM R. BORBELY LARRY J. AND MARCELENE A. GODE GARY L. ALDERMAN AND MARY J. ALDERMAN ROBERT J. AND SUE A. MASSEY, FREDERICK P. NADER CEB No. 2001 -086 G. BCC vs. Anna Rosa Avalos CEB No. IM2001 -01 5. NEW BUSINESS Request for Imposition of Fines /Lien A. BCC vs. Jason James Billingson and Marie Davey Starr CEB No. 2001 -063 B. BCC vs. Penelope P. Maroules CEB No. 2001 -074 C. BCC vs. McAlpine Briarwood, Inc., and Charles Hitchcock CEB No. 2001 -075 D. BCC vs. Andrew and Letty Espinoza CEB No. 2001 -079 Request for Dismissal /Reduction of Fines A. BCC vs. Albertina Cardona and Terry Arce CEB No. 2001 -023 6. OLD BUSINESS 7. REPORTS Filing Affidavits of Compliance A. BCC vs. Penelope P. Maroules CEB No. 2001 -074 B. BCC vs. Andrew and Letty Espinoza CEB No. 2001 -079 8. COMMENTS Request for Discussion from Charles Abbott A. BCC vs. BCC vs. Karen R. Ardner CEB No. 2001 -001 B. BCC vs. Frederick C. & Susan Thurston CEB No. 2001 -002 9. NEXT MEETING DATE December 17, 2001 - 10. ADJOURN Misc. Corres: Date: a Item# 1 Copies To: November 29, 2001 16J 2 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD Naples, Florida, November 29, 2001 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Code Enforcement Board, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9 a.m. In REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: CLIFFORD FLEGAL ROBERTA DUSEK KATHRYN M. GODFREY -LINT DARRIN M. PHILLIPS PETER LEHMANN GEORGE PONTE RHONA SAUNDERS ABSENT: DIANE TAYLOR KATHLEEN CURATOLO ALSO PRESENT: JEAN RAWSON, Attorney for the Board MICHELLE ARNOLD, Code Enforcement Director MARIA CRUZ, Enforcement Official Page 1 November 29, 2001 1 J 2 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Call the meeting of the Code Enforcement Board of Collier County to order, please. Please make note that any person who decides to appeal a decision of this board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and, therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Neither Collier County nor the Code Enforcement Board shall be responsible for providing this record. Have the roll call, please. MS. CRUZ: Good morning. For the record, Maria Cruz, code enforcement investigator. Let the record show that Kathleen Curatolo is absent, called in. Roberta Dusek. MS. DUSEK: Here. MS. CRUZ: Clifford Flegal. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Here. MS. CRUZ: Katherine Godfrey. MS. GODFREY: Here. MS. CRUZ: Peter Lehmann. MR. LEHMANN: Here. MS. CRUZ: Darrin Phillips. MR. PHILLIPS: Here. MS. CRUZ: George Ponte. MR. PONTE: Here. MS. CRUZ: Rhona Saunders. MS. SAUNDERS: Here. MS. CRUZ: And, also, let the record show that Diane Keller -- Taylor did inform that she was going to be absent today. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Since Miss Taylor is absent and Mr. Phillips is here as an alternate, Darrin, you will participate fully. Approval of our agenda, are there any changes, additions, Page 2 16J 2 November 29, 2001 corrections? MS. ARNOLD: For the record, Michelle Arnold, code enforcement director. There are two changes. Item F under your public hearing, Board of County Commissioners versus Manatee Resort Condominium, they're requesting a continuance, so if we can move that item first under public hearing to hear that. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: No problem. MS. ARNOLD: And under new business, we're adding an item under -- under the heading, request for an extension, and that was Board of County Commissioners versus Rick Bell. That was CEB Case 2001 -078. And did we pass out that information, that letter? MS. CRUZ: The letter. MS. ARNOLD: Yeah. You -all received a letter from Mr. Rick Bell that was distributed to you this morning. So we'll put this on the last item on -- under new business. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Any other changes? Additions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: If not, I'd entertain a motion to approve the agenda as changed. MR. LEHMANN: So moved. MS. DUSEK: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second to the agenda as changed. All those in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Approval of our minutes from October 25th. Any changes? Corrections? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: If not, I would entertain a motion to Page 3 November 29, 2001 accept. 16J 2 MR. PONTE: So moved. MS. DUSEK: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion to accept the minutes as submitted for October 25th. All those in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you. We will now open our public hearing portion, and the first item is Board of County Commissioners versus Manatee Resort Condominium Association, Inc. MR. WHITE: Good morning. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Good morning. MR. WHITE: My name is Austin White. I'm an attorney for Manatee Resort Condominium Association, Inc. And we have requested a continuance of this item because of the fact that we have been cited. But there are 19 units at the Manatee Resort. Each unit owner has been cited individually as well. As you'll notice from your notice of hearing, most of the unit owners reside either out of state or out of the country. And so in an effort to have them attend the hearing, we've requested a continuance also to allow us the time to submit a appropriate defense packet to you within 10 days of the next hearing date. We have discussed that with Miss -- Miss Belpedio, the assistant county attorney. She's agreed to stipulate to a continuance until December 17th. So with the board's indulgence, we would respectfully request a continuance of this matter until that time. MS. BELPEDIO: Jennifer Belpedio, assistant county attorney. That is true; we are not objecting to the continuance at this time. Page 4 November 29, 20016J 2 In addition, two packages of materials have been submitted to the members of the board. The first package is a supplemental package. The second package is a -- contains documents that are condominium documents. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Do I hear a motion from the board to accept a request for a continuance? MS. DUSEK: So moved. MS. SAUNDERS: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second to accept the request for continuance until our next meeting. All those in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you, sir. The next case is BCC versus Bonnie L. Harrod. MS. ARNOLD: There's another case. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Oh, I'm sorry. BCC versus -- I hope I say this right, and I apologize if I don't -- Occeus and Estiverne. If I mispronounced, I apologize. MS. ARNOLD: Okay. This case is Board of County Commissioners versus -- MR.00CEUS: Saintilien. MS. ARNOLD: -- Saintilien -- MR. OCCEUS: Occeus. MS. ARNOLD: -- Occeus. Thank you very much. That's CEB Case 2001 -081. The violation of -- that has been cited is of Section 1.5.6 of Ordinance 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code. The description of the violation is the operation of auto repairs storage in a residential area. The location and address of this particular violation is 513 Page 5 November 29, 2001 6 J 2 Stokes Avenue in Immokalee, Florida, more particularly described as Folio No. 000000013556004 in Section 9, Township 47, Range 29 east, a hundred and six -- 100 feet of the 215 feet of the west half of the northeast quarter of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter, approximately 49 --49 acres. The name and address of the persons who own this property is present and reside at the location, 513 Stokes Avenue. There is also another address listed at 550 19th Street North, No. 7 in Immokalee, Florida. The day the violation was first observed was July 11th, 2001. The date the owner of record received the violation was July 9th, 2001, as well as October 26, 2001. The -- the requested dates for corrective action was July 23rd, based on the first notice, and October 31 st, based on the second notice that was issued. The last reinspection that was done was -- MR. OCCEUS: Two days ago. MS. ARNOLD: -- two days ago, and the violation remained. MR. MARSH: For the record, John Marsh, code enforcement investigator, Collier County. MS. ARNOLD: The -- we'd like to now enter the packet that was sent to both the respondents and you -all received into evidence as Composite Exhibit A. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Did you receive a package in the mail, sir, from the county? MR.00CEUS: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Fine. Thank you, sir. I would entertain a motion to accept the package from the county. MS. DUSEK: So moved. MS. SAUNDERS: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and that second to accept the package from the county. Page 6 November 29, 20 16J 2 MS. ARNOLD: I dust need to make a correction to the statement. The violation actually has been abated. This is one that's been reoccurring, and we're bringing it to you today as a repeat violation. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Back to the motion. All those in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. (The oath was administered.) MR. MARSH: Again, for the record, John Marsh, code enforcement investigator. We brought this case before the board. It's been a reoccurring situation since 1997. We have seven cases which are basically all the same as far as violation, illegal land use, litter, working on automobiles on the property. In your packets there are photos which probably go back that far -- is that upside down or right side up? MR. LEHMANN: Yes. Could you reverse that, please. MR. MARSH: These are just some of the recent photos of this case that we're talking about at the moment. But, as you see in the packets, the photos go back to '97. They all look the same. The respondent does comply after a certain amount of time after he's been notified and such, but then after six months to a year, he goes right back to doing the same thing. This last case was brought up -- brought to us by the sheriffs department. These are what look like -- two days ago. This is the way it usually looks after he finally comes into compliance each time. But then, like I say, six months to a year later, it goes right back to the same thing. Page 7 November 29, 200116J 2 What we're coming to you for is to be educated as a reoccurring offender so that we can just bring him here and possibly have you take action. MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Marsh, has -- has this board heard and ruled on any prior cases? MR. MARSH: Not to my knowledge. MR. LEHMANN: Okay. Miss Arnold -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: There are no prior board actions against this. MS. ARNOLD: No, there are not. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: This is not a repeat? MS. ARNOLD: Reoccurring. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: There is no such thing as recurring, is there, Miss Rawson? MS. RAWSON: Well, if you look at 162.062, if the violation is corrected and then reoccurs or if the violation is not corrected by the time specified for correction by the code inspector, the case may be presented to the enforcement board even if a violation has been corrected prior to the board hearing. And the notice shall so state. And I believe that all of our notices have been changed to so state. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I understand. My question is as far as a repeat, it's not a repeat. MS. RAWSON: Correct. It's not a repeat. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That it's been corrected I can accept. MS. RAWSON: It's recurring but not repeat. MR. LEHMANN: Miss Rawson, would you repeat that section that you referenced. MS. RAWSON: 162.062, the last sentence. MR. LEHMANN: And that section basically advised us that the county can bring an action before the board regardless of whether the violation is corrected or not? Page 8 J1 MS. RAWSON: Correct. November 29, 2001 16 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Right. MS. RAWSON: Especially in a situation like this when I believe the testimony was that there were seven times that he had been cited prior. MR. MARSH: There is a list of the violations in the past years. MS. GODFREY: Investigator Marsh, what he does is cleans it up until you leave him alone and he starts back up again and -- MR. MARSH: Yes. He promises he's going to keep it clean and not do it anymore, and then six months later or so he's right back at it again. I suggested to him to go to town and get a proper piece of property and licensing to run automobile repair. MS. GODFREY: Uh -huh. MR. MARSH: This is the second time I've had this specific individual on a case. MS. GODFREY: I noted on one of the pictures he has a bucket under one of the vans. Is he -- how's he disposing of his oil? Is he dumping it in the ground or -- MR. MARSH: I don't know that. MS. GODFREY: Okay. MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Marsh, has this particular respondent ever been found by any other quasi-judicial or judicial process to have violated or admitted violating the same provision within the last five years? MR. MARSH: Not to my knowledge. MR. LEHMANN: He has not been found by any other board, any other judicial process? MR. MARSH: He was never issued a citation. He always came into compliance, and so they just dropped the cases there, rather than getting to the point now that we would like to seek further action done so that we can stop this from reoccurring. November 29, 2001 16J 2 MS. SAUNDERS: So has he paid any fines for those just notices that he cleared up before a fine was imposed? MR. MARSH: Not to my knowledge, he hasn't paid any fines. MS. SAUNDERS: Okay. MS. GODFREY: And the county's incurring charges because you have to go out and investigate these cases, and then as soon as he's going to come before us, he cleans the place up? MR. MARSH: Yes, ma'am. MR. LEHMANN: Miss Rawson, to be very clear on this, since the respondent has not come before this board or actually had an order or a finding of fact against him on a violation or has not gone through any other judicial process -- which the statute is very specific. It states that if he were tried and found guilty, in a sense, of any other quasi-judicial board, then we could act on this as -- as a repeat case. MS. RAWSON: That's correct. MR. LEHMANN: As that is not the case, we must act as this is the first case coming before this board. MS. RAWSON: That's right. MR. LEHMANN: Thank you. MS. ARNOLD: And what we're asking you to do is look at the evidence to show that this is a reoccurring problem. And the board can take action and -- as to whether or not the problem has reoccurred. And it's my understanding that you can -- based on that, if it were to reoccur again, this would be deemed a repeat violation. You're going to be acting or adjudicating on this violation. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I mean, to be a repeat violation, we must first issue an order. Then anytime it happens again, it, in fact, is a repeat violation. MS. RAWSON: Right. But I think what they're asking you today is to, even though it has been abated before we got here, it Page 10 November 29, 2001 16J 2 apparently wasn't abated at the time that they filed the notice to hear the case as a recurring violation. And then if you find, in fact, it is a recurring violation, the next time you come back then it would be a repeat violation, but not today. MR. LEHMANN: According to state statute, Chapter 162, Section 162.045, the definition of a repeat violation means a violation of a provision of a code or ordinance by a person who has been previously found through an enforcement board -- excuse me. Through a Code Enforcement Board or any other quasi-judicial or judicial process to have violated or who has admitted violating the same provision within five years prior to the violation, notwithstanding the violations occur at different locations. So if we hear this case today and we find that the respondent had violated the -- the code, then that would enable the county, in a sense, to bring any future cases to the board as a repeat violation, but it would not enable them to take immediate action as a repeat violation against the violator; is that correct? MS. RAWSON: I think that they would bring it before the board. MR. LEHMANN: Okay. THE COURT: Any other questions for Mr. Marsh? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you, sir. MR. MARSH: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Would you state your name, sir. MR. OCCEUS: Saintilien Occeus. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Would you swear him in, please. (The oath was administered.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Tell us your side, sir. MR. OCCEUS: This is 1999. I have been in a bad accident, and I was on doctor care. All this problem after '97 that you -all are Page 11 November 29, 2001 16J � saying, those happened by friend that to loan me because I was hospitalized, and they keep parking car. People go up there and wait on it. And when I found out, there wasn't too much I can do. When the inspector -- inspector found out about it, he told me then -- it take me some time to correct it. But I did correct it. I'm a sick man. I couldn't do too much no more. That's why I had somebody that watched the place for me. I'm going to try to fence it. MS. DUSEK: Sir, you said this was in 1999? This was -- you were talking about 1999? MR. OCCEUS: This is July 6, 1999. I was in bad accident. MS. DUSEK: Yes. MR. OCCEUS: I didn't have too much control on that land -- MS. DUSEK: Yes. MR. OCCEUS: -- because I couldn't work. And I'm still under doctor care now for same thing. And what it was, people who knew me go there, park the stuff, with the -- the land was full with the stuff, like the inspector said. But after the -- after they advised me to clean it, it took me some time because -- now -- because -- I have somebody in the place now, watch the place for me. And I'm trying to fence it. That will not happen no more. MS. GODFREY: Is this vacant property, or is there a residence on it? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: You had a house or something on this property, sir? MR. OCCEUS: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: And tell us what's on the property. House? Garage? Or is it just -- MR. OCCEUS: It used to be a -- it used to be a building they we do mechanic work since 1980. Then after the business closed, there was somebody -- they come back, and they shut the license on Page 12 November 29, 200 16J 2 it. But it's still there as that place now, yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I got the idea. MS. SAUNDERS: Do you live there, sir, or -- MR. OCCEUS: Not now. MS. SAUNDERS: But when did you live there? MR. OCCEUS: Way back before -- way back -- way back, like, '95, '96. MS. GODFREY: Is there -- is there anybody living in that house now? MR. OCCEUS: Right now, yes. I put somebody in the place to watch for me. MS. SAUNDERS: And how long has that person been living there? They've been a year or -- do you remember? MR. OCCEUS: I'd say about five, four month now. MS. DUSEK: So it's my understanding, sir, that you were not the one who was conducting this type of activity on the property. It was someone else? MR. OCCEUS: From 1999 to now, yes. It was someone else who park the stuff there. Why I used the motor and transmission on the ground, some of those stuff before we junked some of them car. We took some part out. The owner was there with us. They took some part out, come and junk and come get the body. Now that cleared out, that won't happen no more. MS. GODFREY: But you've said that six other times, sir. You told the county you cleaned it up, and then six months to a year down the road it's back the same way again. How do we know that you're not going to do this again? MR. OCCEUS: I -- say that again for me, please. MS. GODFREY: You have cleaned the property up six times, Investigator, and then turned around and allowed this individual that's living at your residence to bring all these vehicles back again, and Page 13 November 29, 2001 6 J then the county comes out and tags you. You clean it up before you come before us, and you've done this six times. And how do we know that after this hearing that you're not going to do it again? MR. OCCEUS: On that six time you're talking about, is that before -- before '99 or -- MS. GODFREY: It doesn't matter. The county has come out six times and found the place a mess, asked you to clean it up, and you clean it up just before you come before us. Never going to happen again, and the county goes out there, and there's another mess. And it just keeps going around and over and over and over again. So how do we know that after this hearing that you're not going to do it again? MR. OCCEUS: Before 1999 -- MS. GODFREY: It doesn't matter about '99, sir. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Let him -- MS. GODFREY: Okay. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- talk. Don't keep interrupting him. MR. OCCEUS: From 1999 I was -- I was the one do all this stuff until all this thing, what they mail to me. But from '99 through now, it was people who knows me involved on this place cause all this mess. And right now I said I clean it. I have somebody watch the place for me, and I -- I wasn't even able to work by now on -- on -- on mechanic. MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Occeus, do you realize that as long as you own this property, you will be responsible for whatever occurs on that property? MR. OCCEUS: Yes. MR. LEHMANN: Okay. So if you allow somebody else to do any activity, whether it's storing parts or working on their cars or whatever it is, it's your responsibility. And that's what this board is Page 14 November 29, 2001161 2 looking at, and that's why you're here today as opposed to somebody else. We have -- we -- it is the board's directive to deal only through the property owner. So you are being held solely responsible for whatever actions may have occurred on your property. MR. OCCEUS: But I -- I promise now that won't happen -- happen no more. MR. LEHMANN: Well, apparently you've made that promise before. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Mr. Marsh, you had a chart before about prior things. Could we see that again? MR. MARSH: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Hopefully there's some dates on there. I think dates will help people. Case found numbers. MR. MARSH: It starts at '97 on the bottom, sir, '98, '98, '99, '99, '99, 2000, and 2000. MS. SAUNDERS: So there are two violations that were cited, one in 2000 and one in 2001, and after each of those -- MR. MARSH: I'm sorry. There's one in 2000, and the last is in 2001. MS. SAUNDERS: After the 2000 notice, it was cleaned up again? MR. MARSH: Yes, ma'am. MR. PONTE: Investigator -- MR. MARSH: The top two cases are my cases. MS. SAUNDERS: So he -- what I'm getting at, I guess, after his 1991 -- '99 accident when he was supposedly in charge of it, he has cleaned -- it has cleaned it up and it's come back to the same problem again. MR. MARSH: Yes, ma'am. The cases in '99 weren't mine. MS. SAUNDERS: Right. MR. MARSH: They were Investigator Saldano who is no Page 15 November 29, 20 0 1 longer with us. 16J z MS. SAUNDERS: Uh -huh. MR. MARSH: But the area was cleaned up then, was abated, and we're right back at it again. One of my first cases in Immokalee was this case. MR. PONTE: Investigator, in your many visits out there, have you met with anyone other than the respondent? MR. MARSH: No, sir. There have been many people out there, but the only one I've ever met with and talked to is the respondent. MR. PONTE: So the tenant/operator, as it were, there was no one -- no one else there that would seem to be operating the business other than the respondent? MR. MARSH: That's a hard question to answer. They could have been helpers. There were other people there. And, naturally, when I pull up, everybody stops doing whatever they're doing. And, therefore, the only one I would talk to would be the respondent because it was his property and he was there. MR. PONTE: He mentioned helpers. How many people would you estimate were helping? MR. MARSH: Well, sometimes the people that are out there range from maybe two to four, five, six. A lot of times they're just sitting there, maybe playing cards or things of that -- it's a gathering place. MS. GODFREY: But, Investigator, he is there while all this mess is there. It's not like he doesn't know -- like he's an absentee landlord. MR. MARSH: I would say 90 percent of the time that I have gone out there to reinspect or to issue notices of violation or such that the respondent had been on the property. MS. GODFREY: So him saying that he was unaware of this going on, he was right there and he saw it, so he knew. Page 16 MR. MARSH: I would say so. November 29, 2001 16J 2 MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Marsh, you have two cases that were abated by the contractor as opposed to -- under the respondent's action; is that correct? MR. MARSH: Yes. MR. LEHMANN: What -- when you say abated by the contractor, define what that means. MR. MARSH: They were litter cases, I believe. They were put down as litter cases, and a contractor went out and cleared the area. MR. LEHMANN: Okay. MR. MARSH: Of, say, vehicles that were determined to be litter and automotive parts and such like that. MR. LEHMANN: Was this a contractor hired by the county or by the respondent? MR. MARSH: It would most likely be by the county. MR. LEHMANN: So the county has had to take action itself twice? MR. MARSH: Yes. MS. GODFREY: So the county's incurred quite an amount of funds to keep this place cleaned up if he doesn't. MR. MARSH: Yes. MS. GODFREY: Plus the time that you spend going out there. MR. MARSH: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Of all these two, four, six, eight violations that are listed here, how many times has he been cited for operation of an auto repair shop? MR. MARSH: I think he actually hasn't been cited as operation of a repair shop. He's been cited as illegal land use, which would encompass that. MR. LEHMANN: It's cited under Section 1.5.6 of Ordinance No. 91 -02. Page 17 November 29, 200'16J 2 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Every time he's been cited has it been the same? MR. MARSH: It would be the determination of the investigator either to call it litter or to call it illegal land use, which can encompass quite a few things or could have been occupational license, you know, license to operate the business out there. It's not zoned for that. So it would be at the discretion of the investigator. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: What -- what I'm looking for is, out of eight times, since he's been cited for 1.5.6, has all eight times been for 1.5.6? MR. MARSH: The director is looking it up right now. MR. LEHMANN: It's a pretty broad section. MR. PONTE: Inspector, when you go out there and you see the activity going on - -. MR. MARSH: Yes, sir. MR. PONTE: -- Inspector, when you're out there and see the activity going on and there are other helpers or workers, is there a safety factor, too, that's a problem here? I notice in one of the photos a van was propped up by a bucket, which would indicate to me that work was going on under the van. MR. MARSH: Oh, definitely. It's just -- the only thing on the property is a cinder -block building which was supposed to be a garage for the property. I believe at one time there was a mobile home on the property. There's a cement pad there that indicates that, plus a telephone pole or a electrical pole. And at this time there's just a cinder -block building. There's no actual facilities for, really, working on vehicles. MR. PONTE: So in addition to safety, would you say that that is an environmental problem as well, disposal of oil -- MR. MARSH: Definitely. We have no idea where all of that's going at the time. Page 18 November 29, 2001 6 J 2 MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Chairman, if we don't have any further comments or questions, I'm willing to proceed -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I want to know how many times for this paragraph, because if it's going to be recurring, you can't mix apples and oranges. If he's never been cited for this section, then it's not even recurring because people can be cited for -- I don't know. The code's probably 4, 5 inches thick. So I don't think you can mix them up. Would that be right, Miss Rawson? MS. RAWSON: That's correct. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: So if he hasn't been cited for this paragraph, then we can forget even the word recurring. So let's find that out. MS. DUSEK: Miss Rawson, I also have a question. Since it's been abated, how can we cite him today and do a -- MS. RAWSON: Well, you can say that you don't want the violation to occur again. MS. DUSEK: But it can't be -- we can't say that we're bringing him because of Section 1.5.6. MS. RAWSON: Well, it depends on if he's been cited under that section before. It -- it's a recurring violation. MS. DUSEK: Even though it's now been abated. MS. RAWSON: Correct. MS. DUSEK: We can bring him a violation. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes. MS. RAWSON: Correct. MS. DUSEK: And, also, in addition to that question, can you charge him with future costs, or do you have to wait -- costs for the county? MS. RAWSON: Only the costs for prosecution of this action. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes. MS. RAWSON: And there's no fine because the fine kicks in Page 19 November 29, 2001 J b 2 until they clear up the violation which has already been cleared up. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Right. MS. DUSEK: So the only thing he -- we can cite him for the violation, but we can charge him only for the operation costs. MS. RAWSON: Correct. And you cite him not for the violation but the violation as a recurring violation pursuant to 16206. MR. PONTE: Regarding the operational costs, can these -- are these costs covering all seven? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: No. time. MS. RAWSON: No. Only this one. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Only this one. You can't go back in MS. RAWSON: Correct. MR. LEHMANN: Miss Rawson, you had just made a statement you cite a recurring violation according to Florida statutes. I don't understand where the term "recurring violation" is used. MS. RAWSON: 162062. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Help me a little bit, Miss Rawson. In using 162062, when they use the word in that last sentence, violation corrected and then reoccurs, I get the feeling in reading the whole paragraph that that's -- once we've made a -- a determination, and you're saying it's prior to us making a determination. MS. RAWSON: I'm not sure I understand your question. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. In other words, once we've issued an order and then it reoccurs, you're saying we don't have to issue an order just because they've been doing it every week for 52 weeks, and it finally gets to us, it's reoccurring. MS. RAWSON: If it's the same violation, and this is about the -- I think he said seventh time we're -- that the code enforcement department has been investigating this same violation, and now they've noticed him for hearing on it, but right before the hearing he Page 20 November 29, 2001 abates the violation i n -- 16J CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Right. MS. RAWSON: -- then you can cite him for violation as a recurring violation. And all you can do is tell him not to do it again and charge him with the costs. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Okay. 1.5.6, has he been cited before by you folks? MS. ARNOLD: Yeah. All the properties have been noted as illegal land use; however, we don't -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That wasn't my question. Was he cited for 1.5.6? MS. ARNOLD: I'm trying to answer your question. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. ARNOLD: And -- because we don't have access to the notice, the actual notice of violations on the system right now, I can't tell you the specific section that was noted on that notice of violation. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. So you're saying it's recurring, but we have no, quote, unquote, proof that you can give to us that shows it's the same section. MS. ARNOLD: Well, we've given you testimony from the investigator that it's been out there at least two times. And what we're asking you to look at is this particular -- this last violation that has occurred, I believe that you can say yes or no, did it occur at that time and ask the respondent to do what Miss Rawson has just instructed that you can do. If it reoccurs again, then this will be brought back to you as a repeat violation. MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Marsh, could you put the report up again on the prior violations? When you go into the case type, you've got zoning and environmental. Next to that you have different code sections, is that correct, what's handwritten in? MR. MARSH: Yes, sir. Page 21 November 29, 20116 J 2 MR. LEHMANN: Are those the code sections that you are citing in each individual case? MR. MARSH: Those are the ones that when I looked up the case it came up as. It doesn't necessarily give us numbers. It gives us just a brief -- MR. LEHMANN: Well, what I'm saying, for instance, the first case here next to the case type -- the first case where under the case type heading you have the three- letter designation Z -O -N, and then an arrow going down to a few handwritten numbers, 1.56, 2.67.1 maybe, are those code sections? MS. ARNOLD: Yes. MR. MARSH: Right. MR. LEHMANN: So those -- those two -- those sections that would be applied, the same thing would apply to the next case down? MR. MARSH: But we don't have the actual notice of violations to confirm all that. MR. LEHMANN: I see. Okay. MS. DUSEK: Mr. Marsh, you said that you have cited him on these two different occasions, in 2000 and 2001? MR. MARSH: Yes, ma'am. MR. DUSEK: And when you cited him, did you at that time designate the Section 1.5.6? MR. MARSH: I can only say at this time I -- I -- I know that I remember that. But I don't know about the prior case. MS. DUSEK: With the case that -- I mean, when you were involved and you've cited him more than once -- MR. MARSH: Uh -huh. MS. DUSEK: -- was it Section 1.5.6? MR. MARSH: I can't say for sure, ma'am, because that was a year and a half ago, and I don't have copies of it with me. MS. SAUNDERS: Under the county's statement of violation, it Page 22 November 29 2001 6 J 2 says that the violation was first observed July 11th -- well, was given to the -- notice of violation was given July 9th and then also 10/26. That to me says that there's two violations. Both of them have been abated now. But there were two violations in 2001. MR. MARSH: Second notice of violation was issued because on the first notice of violation there was only one person named. MS. SAUNDERS: Uh -huh. MR. MARSH: And it was thought that to make it complete, we should put the other person on the property. MS. SAUNDERS: So that was the same -- MR. MARSH: It was the same one but just with the extra name on it to cover everything. MS. SAUNDERS: Okay. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any other questions for Mr. Marsh? MS. DUSEK: Well, I have one more. I guess to clear it up in my own head, when you cite these people, wherever it may be, do you ever designate what section you're citing them for, or is it just a general statement? MR. MARSH: No. We tell them what we're citing them for, what part of the code, what their -- what the violation is, what they have to do to correct it, how much time they have. MS. DUSEK: And do you have any record of that so that we would know what section you cited them for -- him for? MR. MARSH: At this time? MS. DUSEK: Yes. MR. MARSH: It would be in the complete case that I filed. MS. DUSEK: That, you don't have that with us. MS. ARNOLD: Yes. You have that in your packet. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes, we have the citation. MS. GODFREY: Uh -huh, here. MS. DUSEK: I guess what I -- Page 23 November 29, 2001 16J 2 MS. ARNOLD: We just don't have the notice of vie -- on -- let's see, on page 8 of your packet, is that the -- is that the corrected one? And also page -- MR. MARSH: Page 7 would be the corrected one. MS. ARNOLD: Page 7 of your packet, that's the notice of violation that was issued. MS. DUSEK: That was -- MS. ARNOLD: And -- MS. DUSEK: That was the most recent violations. MS. ARNOLD: Yes. But we don't have that same document for the prior cases here today. MS. DUSEK: That's what I'm trying to find out so that we can say for sure it's reoccurring. MS. ARNOLD: Well, whether or not we cited 1.5.6 or any other section of the code. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: When you cited him in July, page 8, what is page 7? Why was that issued? MR. MARSH: Because of the names on the property. The names on the property were Saintilien and Occeus and Marveilleas Estivere -- Estiverian (phonetic). I -- on the first notice of violation I only put the gentleman's name; I didn't put the lady's name. And it was thought to make it correct that I should put both -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: And that's the reason you issued this citation? MR. MARSH: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. If that's the reason, then why did you add additional violation sections? MR. MARSH: Well, the first time I went out there, it was basically a couple of vehicles that were licensed, had current license tags on them. And they were being worked on, and there was automobile parts all around and so on. The second time I went out, Page 24 November 29, 2001 1 6 J 2 there was many more vehicles out there that weren't licensed that were all around the property. So I thought it was proper to add that at the time to cover that issue also. MR. LEHMANN: Are those sections still applicable? The statement of violation only refers to 1.5.6? You have Section 2.6.7.1 also -- MR. MARSH: Uh -huh. MR. LEHMANN: -- on your handwritten violation. Your statement of violation does not reference that section. MS. ARNOLD: Correct. The statement of violation that was said only referenced 1.5.6. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yeah. Why? MS. ARNOLD: Why did we exclude the other? I think that -- the reason why we're bringing this particular case to you is for the illegal land use, the operation of the repair, not for the unlicensed vehicles. Maria did check through the files. We do have the notice of violations for two of the cases that were issued. This one is Case No. -- this is the 2000 case, and the investigator was Mr. Marsh, and he did, as you can see, put 1.5.6 on there. This is the -- another case that was in '98, and, again, the notice of violation -- the violation, 1.5.6, was noted. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Good. That's what we were looking for. MS. DUSEK: That's it. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Any additional questions for Mr. Marsh? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any more questions for Mr. -- MR. MARSH: Occeus. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- Occeus? (No response.) Page 25 you. November 29, 20abJ 2 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: None? You may sit down, sir. Thank MS. DUSEK: I do have one question for somebody. Is it just Mr. Occeus who's being cited? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: No. They're both being cited. MS. DUSEK: Okay. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Because they're both owners of the property. MS. DUSEK: Okay. Then I'd like to make a motion that in the case of the Board of County Commissioners versus Saintilien Occeus and Malveilleas Estiverne in the Case CEB No. 2000001 -081, that there is a recurring violation of Section 1.5.6 of Ordinance No. 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code. Now, the description of the violation, I'm not so sure what is written there is correct for 1.5.6. MR. LEHMANN: Miss Rawson, do we need to give a description, or can we just cite a code section and violation? MS. RAWSON: You can just cite the 1.5.6. MR. LEHMANN: That would be my recommendation. MS. DUSEK: Okay. MR. LEHMANN: Also -- I apologize for interrupting again. Is it the warranty deed I'm looking at references -- MS. RAWSON: His wife. I noticed that. MR. LEHMANN: Yes. So should the names change? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well, they may not. I don't know. MR. LEHMANN: Under the finding of fact? MS. RAWSON: Well, they didn't cite the wife. They cited one landowner, not the other. MR. LEHMANN: No. They've cited both. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well, that one was issued after the statement of violation was mailed. In other words, they did it to Page 26 correct their paperwork and -- MS. ARNOLD: No. November 29, 2001 16J 2 MS. RAWSON: It's a corrected deed, I think. MR. LEHMANN: So what is our correct finding of fact, then? MS. RAWSON: Well, I think when they see -- they issued their notice of violation, they had the correct -- they had the correct landowners. Now, there is a re -- rerecorded deed to correct errors which indicates to me, I suspect, that now they're married. But it's apparently the same person. MR. LEHMANN: But that was rerecorded back in 1990. No. I take it back. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: It was recorded. MR. LEHMANN: 1990. MS. RAWSON: I think it's the same person would be my guess. MR. LEHMANN: I just want to make sure that we're doing this properly. MR. MARSH: If I could help you straighten that out. MR. LEHMANN: Pardon me? MR. MARSH: I believe the parties were divorced and they were supposed to sell the property and split it or something like that and the wife went back to her maiden name or some other name. That's why the difference between the deed and what the property says. MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Occeus, is that a correct statement? MR.00CEUS: Yes. MS. RAWSON: It is the same person, is it not? MR. MARSH: (Nodded head.) MR. OCCEUS: You must repeat that to say if both of us would sign the violation, that's what you mean just a while ago? MR. LEHMANN: No. We were just looking at the warranty deed versus the records we have to make sure that we're all talking Page 27 November 29, 2001 about the right persons. 16J 2 MR. OCCEUS: Okay. MS. ARNOLD: We have the information about her changing her name back to her maiden name as well, so it is the same person. MR. LEHMANN: I apologize, Miss Dusek. I apologize for the interruption. MS. RAWSON: I can simply put formerly known as. MS. ARNOLD: Okay. MS. DUSEK: Well, that concludes my motion. MS. SAUNDERS: I'll second it. MR. LEHMANN: I thought I broke your chain of thought there. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I lost mine. We have a motion and a second that there, in fact, is a violation. Miss Rawson, is it correct to say that there is a violation since it has been abated? MS. DUSEK: I said recurring. MS. RAWSON: You can call it a recurring violation. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. We have a motion and a second that there, in fact, is a recurring violation. Any further questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All those in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Order of the board? MS. SAUNDERS: I would like to ask Michelle how -- what the operating costs on -- since, I guess, July on this case have been. Do you have a feel for -- do you know what the operating costs are? MS. ARNOLD: We've estimated approximately $200. MS. SAUNDERS: That's it? Okay. Page 28 November 29, 200,16J I would move that the respondent be ordered to pay all operating costs incurred in the prosecution of this case and a fine of $100 per day be imposed if the violation reoccurs for each day. MR. LEHMANN: Miss, Rawson, I don't believe we can do it. MS. DUSEK: I don't think we can do that. MS. RAWSON: I don't think you can do that either. The first part's fine, but I don't believe you can fine him because the violation has been abated. MS. SAUNDERS: Okay. So we'd have to have another case brought back to us and we can do -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes. MS. SAUNDERS: Okay. I'll change my motion to ask the respondent to pay all operating costs imposed in the prosecution of this case. MR. PONTE: I'll second that. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second that the respondents be ordered to pay the cost for prosecuting this case before the board. Any further question? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you. Sir, do you know what we've done? We -- we found that you were violating the section of the code. You have corrected it. Now we're ordering you to pay a fine -- pay the costs, which, in essence, is basically a fine, of $200 for that. Okay? MR. OCCEUS: Okay. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All right, sir. MS. ARNOLD: I have a question. Is it possible to request that Page 29 November 29, 20011 6 J 2 the violation not be repeated or request the respondent not do it again as part of the order? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I think that's a little redundant. MS. RAWSON: Well, you know, basically I think in general we're telling everybody don't violate the codes. I mean, I think it's implicit. We -- we can tell him today when he leaves we found him to be in violation because it's a recurring violation, and he should be aware of the fact that if he does this again it will be back as a repeat violation. But I think it -- it's implicit in every order: Don't do it again. MS. DUSEK: Mr. Occeus, do you understand that if you should repeat this same violation, that when you come back before this board that we will then impose upon, if you have -- MR. OCCEUS: Yes. MS. DUSEK: If it has reoccurred again? MR. OCCEUS: That will happen no more. MS. DUSEK: Okay. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Miss Rawson, I get the distinct impression there's some thoughts about repeat violation. If it comes back before this board and let's say it's under the same conditions, that it gets abated before it gets here, we're, again, in the position where you can't fine him for something he's already corrected; is that correct? MS. RAWSON: Well, now, though you're looking at a repeat violation. That -- here. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That will be abated before he gets MS. RAWSON: Right. Well, we're looking at a repeat recurring violation. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Right. But you can only charge him with the costs, not -- Page 30 November 29, 2001 16J z MS. RAWSON: The purpose of a fine is to bring people into compliance. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Right. But if he gets in compliance before he gets here, you can't -- MS. RAWSON: Probably right. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yeah. Just so people understand that. I think there's some people leaning toward that, oh, you can fine him for the days he didn't correct it. And until we issue an order to correct, you can't fine him. MS. DUSEK: Well, let me ask Miss Rawson this: If it's a recurring, how do you ever stop the recurrence if you don't fine? If you can't fine on a recurring -- MS. RAWSON: Bringing him back and charging him with the operational costs. MS. DUSEK: So the only thing he can be charged for are operational costs. MS. RAWSON: As long as he's abated it. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Correct. MS. RAWSON: And it seems like that's a lot of trouble to go through to keep getting him to abate it, but you can always charge him with the operational costs. MS. DUSEK: That seems pretty cheap to be running a business. MS. ARNOLD: I -- I -- I think -- MR. PONTE: Is there a mechanism -- MS. ARNOLD: I think there's been other opinions on that, and I -- and I do have them in my files. So I'm going -- MS. RAWSON: Good. Share those with me. MS. ARNOLD: Okay. MS. RAWSON: Then maybe we'll have -- MS. ARNOLD: Okay. MS. RAWSON: -- a legal memorandum for you. Page 31 MS. ARNOLD: Yup. November 29, 2001 16J 2 MS. RAWSON: Because I'm sure the county attorney's office will help you with that. MS. ARNOLD: Okay. MR. LEHMANN: If that is such a big loophole as it sounds, that may be something the commissioners want to address. MS. RAWSON: Well, we will look into it -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: You can change the statute. MS. RAWSON: -- because we haven't had that problem yet, but we will anticipate it. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Next case -- or we will be here until six -- Board of County Commissioners versus Bonnie Harrod. MS. CRUZ: Yes, sir. Let the record show that Mr. Harrod is not present. I would like to request that the packet provided to the respondent and to the board be admitted into evidence marked Composite Exhibit A. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I'd entertain in a motion to accept the county's exhibit. MS. DUSEK: So moved. MR. LEHMANN: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second to accept the county's exhibit. All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) MS. CRUZ: The violation brought before this board today on Case No. 2001 -082, Bonnie -- Board of County Commission versus Bonnie L. Harrod, it's violation of Section 2.6.7.2 and Section 1.5.6 of Ordinance No. 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code; Section 4 -A of Ordinance No. 93 -64, the Collier County Right - Of -Way Ordinance; and Section 6, 7, and 8 of Ordinance No. 99 -51, Page 32 November 29, 200 the Collier County Weeds and Litter Ordinance. The violation describes as prohibited parking of recreational vehicles; prohibited outside storage of litter, consisting of but not limited to cut wood, metal, plastic, camper top for truck; and, also, the unlawful growing of vegetation into the right -of -way. This violation exists at 699 98th Avenue North, Naples, Florida. It is more particularly described as Naples Park, Unit 3, Block 29, Lots 1 and 2. The owner of record is Bonnie L. Harrod. Address of record is 695 98th Avenue North, Naples, Florida. The violation was first observed on August 13, 2001. The notice of notice of violation was provided to respondent on August 13, 2001, and requesting compliance by August 27, 2001. As of yesterday, the violation remains. At this time I turn the case over to investigator Shawn Luedtke. MR. LUEDTKE: For the record, Shawn Luedtke, Collier County code enforcement investigator. I received this -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: One moment, please. We need to swear Mr. Luedtke in. (The oath was administered.) MR. LUEDTKE: On August 13th, 2001, I received a call about some trees growing over the sidewalk and making the kids go out into the road on their way home from school at this particular location. I responded to the location, and they did have trees growing out over the sidewalk and blocking the view or the view for traffic, vehicular traffic, and making the kids go out into the right -of -way. While on site I also saw a canoe, recreation vehicle in the front yard, numerous amounts of litter consist of cut wood, turned -over trash cans, garbage, a washer in the front yard, and a camper top in the driveway with a tire on top. On August -- August 13th is when I observed the violations. I immediately sent a notice of violation with a correction date of Page 33 November 29, 200 J b � August 27, 2001. On August 27th I rechecked the site, noticed the boat had been removed from the location, but all the other violations remained. I went ahead at that time and prepared a citation. Nobody was home at the location, so I sent a citation certified mail which came back unclaimed by the resident. I rechecked the sites again on September 6th, 13th, and 17th, and attempted a phone call with a number we had listed in information by calling and trying to find the owner's number. That number had been disconnected, and I had no luck trying to find the owner or make contact with the owner. At that time we prepared a CEB warning letter to be sent. The letter was posted and sent on September 21 st. On Aug -- on October 2nd, I spoke with Miss Harrod on the phone. She contacted to me. And I explained all the violations of what needed to be done to be corrected. She requested two weeks and she'd have all the violations corrected. I scheduled a recheck for October 16th. At that time none of the violations had been corrected at that time. I tried to make recontact with the owner to see what the status was. I had no luck, no answer. I posted my card on the property and was unable to make any contact. On October 25th we processed this for a full hearing. I rechecked the site yesterday morning. A lot of the trees have been cut down, not all of them. But the trees have just been cut down, and they have piles of dead branches and trees piled up in the side yard. The litter remains on site, and some of the trees still block the drive -- the sidewalk causing the children to go out into the roadway. That's a main sidewalk that kids use coming from Naples Park Elementary School. MR. PONTE: Investigator, does Mrs. Harrod live in the house, Page 34 November 29, 2001 or does she rent it to someone else? 16J z MR. LUEDTKE: She advised she lives in the house. I have never caught anybody on the property. I tried early flex shifts in the morning. I start at 5 in the morning. I'm not able to catch anybody or anybody answering the door. MR. PONTE: And regarding the Brazilian peppers, I think they were -- MR. LUEDTKE: Yes, sir. MR. PONTE: -- what length of sidewalk is blocked? Are we talking 50 feet? A hundred feet? MR. LUEDTKE: I would probably say, since a lot of it's been removed, probably now a total of maybe 10 to 15 feet is all that remains. MR. PONTE: I see. MR. LUEDTKE: Because they did take a substantial amount out and piled it up in their front yard. So they have a lot of dead Brazilian pepper piled up in the front yard right now. MS. SAUNDERS: Did they remove all of the exotic? MR. LUEDTKE: Yes. Most of the exotic. What they have now is sea grape growing at the back of the property and at the front of the property growing over the sidewalk. MS. SAUNDERS: You did say that some of the litter remains as well? MR. LUEDTKE: Yes, ma'am. MR. PONTE: And how long ago was it -- MR. LUEDTKE: Sir? MR. PONTE: How long was it that Mrs. Harrod said she would have this all cleared up? MR. LUEDTKE: I spoke with her on -- October 2nd was the last time I spoke with her. And she requested two weeks. She said she could have it all cleaned up in two weeks. Page 35 November 29, 16J 2 MR. PONTE: Okay. MR. LUEDTKE: I have photographs that are black and white. They're not the best quality. We're having problems with our printers this morning. The cut wood, piles of dead branches in the yard, the noted washer or whatever still on the property. These were all taken yesterday morning. MR. PONTE: So she's abated the problem but created another? MR. LUEDTKE: To a point, yes, sir. MS. SAUNDERS: It seems to me we have somewhat of a safety problem here -- the kids are walking back and forth -- if there's a washer, dryer that they can get into and play and, you know, get trapped in. I'm uncomfortable with the fact that the person's obviously not rushing to get anything done. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: The bushes along the sidewalk, have they been trimmed? MR. LUEDTKE: This is the photograph taking -- yesterday morning. You can still see how the bushes are growing up over the sidewalk about a quarter of the way to a half the way. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any further questions for the investigator? MS. DUSEK: I need some clarification on, again, the 1.5.6, which says no building or structure or part thereof. Does this fall under that when it's litter? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That I think -- MR. LUEDTKE: We're addressing the land use of the -- what's not covered under litter would be the outside storage of some of the material that you see that's -- they're using the land for what it's not intended for by storing camper tops, tires, etc., in the driveway. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That's kind of a catch -all section. MS. DUSEK: Right. I think we had this discussion once before in another case. Page 36 November 29, 2001 16J CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: You can pretty almost much cite anybody for almost anything under that paragraph. MS. DUSEK: It's very broad, yeah. And 2.6.7.2 is the recreational vehicle? MR. LUEDTKE: That was the recreation vehicle, the canoe that has been abated. MS. DUSEK: So that's been abated. MR. LUEDTKE: Yes, ma'am. MS. DUSEK: So it's just 1.5.6. MR. LUEDTKE: And the litter of 99 -51 and the right -of -way of growing the plants into the right -of -way without permits, 93 -64. MS. DUSEK: Right. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any further questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you, sir. MR. LUEDTKE: Thank you. MS. DUSEK: I'm ready to make a motion, Mr. Chairman. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes, ma'am. MS. DUSEK: In the case of the Board of County Commissioners versus Bonnie Harrod, in the case CEB 2001 -082, I make a motion that there is a violation of Section 1.5.6 of Ordinance 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code; Section 4 -A of Ordinance 93 -64, the Collier County Right -of -way Ordinance; and Sections 6, 7, 8 of Ordinance 99 -51, the Collier County Weeds and Litter Ordinance. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion that, in fact, a violation does exist. Do I hear a second? MR. PONTE: I'll second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a second. Any further discussion? (No response.) Page 37 aye. November 29, 200 16J CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All those in favor signify by saying (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Order of the board? MS. SAUNDERS: I would like to ask staff what the earliest recommendation we could make or earliest time period we can suggest to get this cleaned up. Is five days reasonable? You've recommended 30, but I think that's highly overgenerous in this situation. MS. ARNOLD: Well, I mean, her prior request was for two weeks. That would be generous as well. I mean, she said -- MS. SAUNDERS: That was -- that was two -- almost a month and a half ago or so. MS. ARNOLD: Right. MS. SAUNDERS: That's why I'm really inclined, especially the fact that kids are back in school, the traffic is picked up, I think we should get it cleaned up and be fairly stern on this one. Miss Rawson -- MS. RAWSON: Yes. MS. SAUNDERS: -- could we do this and, say, give her five days from the date she gets the notice or five days from today, whatever? MS. RAWSON: I would give her more time than that because I can't predict what day she's going to get the notice. MS. SAUNDERS: Okay. MS. SAUNDERS: How about ten days? MR. LEHMANN: I would suggest in whatever time period you give her, give her working days and define what the day is. We don't want to give her five days over a holiday or something of that nature Page 38 or over a weekend. November 29, 200i6J 2 MR. PONTE: We've discussed that part before -- MS. DUSEK: Yes. MR. PONTE: - -and decided that we have to do it in terms of days, the -- if you start counting working days only, because I wanted to put it forward, because of Thanksgiving or some other holiday, and we rejected that, so -- MS. DUSEK: Well, that -- if we do two weeks, that takes care of working days so -- MR. PONTE: Fourteen days. MS. DUSEK: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: People trimming bushes work weekends. MS. DUSEK: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Fourteen days really doesn't have a -- the only nonaccess is probably to the dump, which if you have it all done prior to that, you can still take it on a weekday. I think two weeks would be sufficient. MS. SAUNDERS: Okay. Then we -- we do it two weeks. And the other suggestion I've got is that we make the fine a little bit more stringent, again, up to $50 per day because I do think there's a safety factor involved. that? MS. DUSEK: I concur with that. MR. LEHMANN: Your recommendation for the fine? MS. SAUNDERS: $50 per day, plus costs. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: So we have two weeks from today. MS. SAUNDERS: Today. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Plus $50 plus the costs. MS. SAUNDERS: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Miss Rawson, do you have Page 39 November 29, 20 MS. RAWSON: Fourteen days and fifty dollars? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes, ma'am. Plus the costs. MS. RAWSON: Got it. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That would be a separate item. MS. RAWSON: Thanks. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion on the floor for an order for 2 weeks, $50 per day fine, if not in compliance, plus the operational costs for prosecuting. Do I hear a second? MR. PONTE: I'll second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a -- we have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you. Let's take five minutes, please. (A short break was held.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. We'll call the board back to order, please. The next case is BCC versus Gerald Martin Dwyer. MS. CRUZ: Yes. Let the record show that Mr. Gerald Martin Dwyer is present. This will be case -- Board of County Commissioners versus Gerald Martin Dwyer, Case No. 2001 -083. I'd like to request that the packet that was provided to the respondent be admitted into evidence, if there's no objection from the respondent. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Sir, did you receive a package from the county, Mr. Dwyer? MR. DWYER: Yes, I did. THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. I'd entertain a motion to accept the county's exhibit. Page 40 November 29, 2001 MR. P 16J TE • So move. 2 ON MS. DUSEK: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second tq accept the county's exhibit. All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you. MR. CRUZ: The violation brought before this board is a violation of Ordinance 98 -76, Section 104.6.1.2. The description of the violation is of existence of an abandoned construction and expired permit. The violation lists at 1961 14th Avenue Northeast, Naples, Florida, and is more particularly described as Golden Gate Estates, Unit 16, the west 150 feet of Tract 62. The owner of record is Gerald Martin Dwyer. His address of record is 1031 North 22nd Avenue, Naples, Florida. The first violation -- the violation was first observed on March 29, 2001. A notice of violation was provided to the respondent on April 20th, 2001, with a correction date of May 20th, 2001. As of yesterday the violation remains. I'd like to turn the case over now to investigator Jeff Letourneau. (The oath was administered.) MR. LETOURNEAU: For the record, my name is Jeff Letourneau, Collier County code enforcement investigator. On March 29th, 2001, I received an anonymous complaint about a unfinished structure at 1961 14th Avenue Northeast. I investigated, and this is the structure that I found present on the property (indicating). After some research I determined that Mr. Dwyer was the owner and contacted him by phone, and he stated that he had tried to build this house back in 1976 and had run into some monetary problems and was unable to finish it. So I determined that according to the Page 41 November 29, 20016J 2 section that I cited, 9876104.6.1.2, that this was now an abandoned structure. On April 20th I served Mr. Dwyer an NOV for the section with an order to correct either by obtaining a valid Collier County permit or removing the structure and associated debris from the unimproved property. Mr. Dwyer signed the NOV. And continuing on through the year, I observed the violation still existed, and Mr. Dwyer attempted to get his permit. He went to permitting and talked to Ed Perico and Johnnie Gebhardt -- Gebhardt who stated that he needed to get everything brought up to code nowadays and pay the impact fees as if it were a building that was building nowadays -- you know, today. Mr. Dwyer went up north for the summer, and I kept in touch with him. He stated that he wanted to come back this month, in November 1 st, and obtain his permit for the -- for the structure. It's on -- not on the sheet, but he did come in early November and talk with myself, my boss, Mr. Morad, and Chief Inspector Jerry Ballard, who told him that he had to go about and act like this structure was being built nowadays and had to come up to the codes of -- of 2001. So we advised him to go get a -- an engineer to draw up the lot and draw up the structure and try to get this thing -- you know, the ball rolling on the permit before he came in here. And that was the last time I talked to him. And I went out yesterday, and the violation still existed. MS. DUSEK: When you spoke to him, did you give him some time frame in which to have the engineer draw up plans and get back to the building department? MR. LETOURNEAU: When I spoke to him, I told him to get ahold of permitting, which he did. And they were the ones that had -- you know, they basically told him that he had to go through the engineering process and everything else to get this structure up to Page 42 November 29, 2001 16J 2 code and permitted. He was advised that, yes, he did have to go through and get the engineering and everything else. MS. DUSEK: And so after that, there was no more contact with you to ask to delay this? MR. LETOURNEAU: Yes, there was. When he was up in -- let's see, seven nine -- when he was up in -- up north, he called my boss, Mr. Morad, and he told him he had spoken with a Mr. Bill Joseph. And Mr. Joseph was a former contractor who was retired who had told Mr. Dwyer that he would try to help him get his -- his permit, but when Mr. Joseph went to talk to permitting, he ran into the same problem. There was a -- you know, he needed to get the impact fees and permit fees and bring the structure up to today's codes. MR. PHILLIPS: Do you know when any work was last performed on that project? MR. LETOURNEAU: I think probably 1976, I imagine. MR. PHILLIPS: Uh -huh. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: '76? MR. LETOURNEAU: Correct. Mr. Dwyer would probably know the last time. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any other questions for the investigator? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you, sir. Mr. Dwyer. MR. DWYER: Yeah. My name -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: One moment, sir. (The oath was administered.) MR. DWYER: There's a lot of reasons for that building being unfinished. Back in the late '60s I bought this building with a friend of mine who was -- I went to school with. He worked in Miami. And we bought a 5 -acre tract from the Gulf American Corporation. Page 43 November 29, 2QI16 J 2 And Brian and I decided -- our plan was to divide the tract in half, 2 1/2 acres each, and we'd both build a house. I was the first one, and he was going to build one. Anyway, the power company stated that they couldn't take a promise, that we had to put the whole structure up and then they would bring the power, the electric. So I filed -- I got the permit then from back in -- back then it was Immokalee. And inspections came from Immokalee and -- and I got some -- I had worked with a contractor up north. But anyway, I drew a building, and I got some guys from North Naples, and they -- it was a masonry structure with a tie beam with reinforcing rod. We followed the code. And then -- this is in -- that was in '76. But, anyways, during that time the company, Gulf American Corporation, went bankrupt. They had promised the city, which was north Golden Gate, which is now Orange Tree -- and when they went bankrupt, they didn't -- the building was -- the city was only a promise, so they didn't build it, but they did do the roads. Well, they told -- they changed the rules that you had to have three houses on the avenue before they would bring the power out from Everglades Avenue, a mile and a half. Well, that -- that killed it for me. What are you going to do -- I was up in the stage -- everything was approved until the electric, plumbing underneath the slab and so forth, and then -- they knew there wouldn't be any more building with no city over there. And with no power, anyway, I had no choice but to -- to leave it. I went back up -- back up north. In the meantime, they had stolen materials I had there, which I was planning to for lack -- ceiling joists. All the rafters, the roof and everything were on. Anyway, to make a long story short, back up north I kept checking with the power company. I can't -- I would come down here with my -- I had a son then about ten years old. And we -- we'd come down on va -- Christmas vacation and check with the power Page 44 �j November 29 296 J 2 company. And they said, "Look. There's -- there's one guy that wants to build, and you get a third guy, and we'll bring the power." well, anyway, that never happened. This other guy had -- he had a third guy who had a camper, and he was going to be the third guy. He was wanted by the police from another state, and he came and took him away. That delayed it again. Well, anyway, during this time I had bought a -- up north I bought this house from my grandfather, an old farmhouse -- he was an retired farmer -- from his estate. And so when he -- my uncle advanced me the money. He wanted me to buy it, and he wanted me to buy the house because it was his father's house. And so anyway, he lent me the money. Well, later he died, and I got into debt quite a bit. Well, my wife to make that -- to make the story short, my wife had divorced me. And I was taking care -- we have one son and -- and Dustin was ten then. And so she met -- well, at that time all you had to do was be separated a year and you get a no -fault divorce, so she -- she got a divorce and then married some guy and wanted -- brought Dustin back to live with me. His name was Dustin Dwyer. So even though I was paying support to the family court -- that's up near Utica, New York. She never came back for over a year, and I -- and then she -- she called me and said to -- to keep Dustin -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Sir, can I ask you a question, please? I'm sorry to interrupt you. Can we get to why you don't have permits now? I mean, this is all interesting information, but let's get to today and why you can't get permits. MR. DWYER: I'll just tell you that my sister -- my son was abandoned. You know, I had to take care of him. I didn't have a chance to come down, finish the house. So that's why the years went by. I think the power came in about -- in the late '80s, and I could have finished it then, but that's when I was taking care of this boy of mine. Page 45 November 29, 2 1 00 6 J So three years ago I went to the power company, and, you know, it's only in the last two, three years they started building houses out there where they started letting them build wood -frame houses. They even burned my -- I used to keep a moat around mine so the roof wouldn't burn. Anyway, three years ago I went to the power company, and they knew I had a dirty deal. So they were going to bring the power to me. I paid the $400 to -- for the poles. The house is about two -- 250 feet from the road, and the -- pay for the transformer, the power, and all that. And they said the county would inspect it. So I got a call from some guy -- I don't know who he was -- but he says, "Look. You don't have a permit." I says, "Yes, I do. That's what the power company went by." he says, "Well, it's too old." he wanted me to come in the next day. I did. He said, "It's too old. You got to get another permit." So I was going to get another permit, and they just put the impact fees on. That's another 5,000 plus. So the following year I had to let it go again. I'm working on a farm up north with my cousin, and my sister -- older sister's got a house that I stay in down here when I come down, and so the -- the power company put -- put the poles and everything out there. The inspector had me come into his office, and he said, "Look, you've got to get another permit." so I -- I was prepared to do that. Well, then the impact fee, we found out, was 5,000. And so I just didn't have the money to -- that kind of money to get another permit. So I went back up -- I went back up in the summer and, again, on the farm. Well, last year was when I had -- I was going to try and resume it when I got a summons. Well, of course, the inspector -- the guy that built the house next to mine had complained it was abandoned. And I went over to see him. He said that -- you know, the guy said he might want to buy it. So he only wanted to give me 10,000 for it. And his wife said the reason she complained, there was squatters -- Page 46 November 29, 2001 she was worried about squatters being over there. 16 Well, there was no law back in those days. There was -- all the stop signs were full of bullet holes. They used it for gun practice. But, anyway, now that there's people there and law enforcement, I don't see where complaining of -- about squatters -- but anyway, that was -- so I didn't want to sell for 10,000. But I tried to -- I put it up for sale with a real estate party. Now, I went to Ed Perico. He's over in the -- where the permits are. And he says, "As long as it's up for sale for the" -- I told him, "I'll get -- raise the money this summer and come down and get a permit, start over again or finish it." And he says, "As long as it's up for sale, they can't really demolish it on you." They wanted to demolish it. Ed Moran said, "If it's -- if it's abandoned, you -- you either got to finish it or demolish it." Well, no one wanted to buy it because they had to buy it, start in with a permit. They thought they could just finish the building, you know, from where it was. So I -- since the summer was over -- during the summer I -- I raised money and financing to get -- finish this building. And, anyways, about a week ago I was -- I was all set to get the permit, and Johnnie Gebhardt over there at the permitting said that you've got to have an engineer to prove that it's safe. So I paid $450 and got an engineer, but he -- he was supposed have the report -- I've got the report here. I just got it yesterday. He said that he'd have it, you know, by last weekend. So I was hoping by today I'd have the permit started, but since I got -- I've got to start with the engineer's report, and that's where it is today. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. So -- MR. DWYER: I hope to finish it because I want to live over there. That's the American dream, isn't it, to build a house and live in it? That's -- there's been a lot of delays in it, but really, there was Page 47 November 29, 200116J 2 nothing I could do unless -- unless I paid my own son to come down here and finish it at this time. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: But you are at this point prepared to go back to the county hopefully with some paperwork to start your process? That's what you're telling us. MR. DWYER: I've got everything ready to go. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. That's what we need to know. Any questions for Mr. Dwyer? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you, sir. You may sit down. MS. DUSEK: I have a question for someone. I'm not sure whether Mr. Dwyer could answer this or the county. How much time do you think it will take for Mr. Dwyer, once he submits his engineering drawings or whatever -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Michelle? MS. DUSEK: -- to be properly permitted? Is that something that somebody can answer? MS. CRUZ: I don't think we can determine the time that it will take for the building department to review the plans and approve or disapprove the permit. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: What's -- what's the normal cycle? I mean, is it three months? Six months? A year? There's some -- some cycle I'm sure. MS. CRUZ: No. I would imagine it would be a lot less than three months. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. CRUZ: We're recommending 60 days. So we think that that will be ample time for him to obtain the permit. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any other questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Finding for the board whether there, in Page 48 November 29, 200 16J 2 fact, exists a violation? MS. DUSEK: I make a motion that in the case of Board of County Commissioners versus Gerald Martin Dwyer, CEB No. 2001- 083, that there is a violation. The violation is of Section 104.6.1.2 of Ordinance 98 -76, the Collier County Building Administrative Code. MR. LEHMANN: I would second that motion. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second that there, in fact, is a violation existing. Any further discussion? aye. (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All those in favor signify by saying (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you. Order of the board. MR. PONTE: I think that if we look at the staff recommendation and make a slight alteration, and the staff recommendation we're talking about 60 days to obtain a building permit, if -- because we have no control over the time element, if we were to rephrase that and say to apply for and shorten the length of time, say, have 30 days to apply for a permit to remove the structure or -- or get it into -- get it permitted, that we -- we follow that. MR. LEHMANN: I think that leaves too large of a loophole because the respondent could apply for it and rescind it and we're back where we were. MR. PONTE: Well -- but he is -- he has the engineering drawings. And, Mr. Dwyer, you are going to go forward with that, are you not, as soon as possible? MR. DWYER: Yes. I -- I plan to start right -- right away on, you know, getting the paperwork started because I just talked to Johnnie Gebhardt Monday. Today's -- or Tuesday, I mean. Today's Page 49 November 29, 2116 J 2 4 Thursday. And she said that -- tell the -- tell you people, the board here that I had trouble getting a permit, engineer's report on time. That was the main -- main thing she wanted. She wanted to make sure this structure is safe to continue on as it is, and it is. This is -- there's a couple things I need to do. It's all spelled out in the engineer's report. And I'm ready to go and start -- start working on it. In fact, three years ago I was ready, but the impact fees were the big thing that stopped me back then. But I've -- I spent a lot of time this summer raising financing and the money so that I can not only get all the materials but everything that is needed to be done to finish that building. So the hard work has been done on it. MR. PONTE: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Miss Rawson, I have a question -- MS. RAWSON: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- just to make sure we're on the right track. The section of the code that has been cited and that we're -- we have found him in violation of, maybe we didn't ask enough questions, but specifically is abandonment. MS. RAWSON: Well, 612 says that, you know, if you don't commence construction within six months, it's -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well, I mean -- MS. RAWSON: -- the permit's expired. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well, it says if construction has commenced, and it did back in '76 or something -- MS. RAWSON: Correct. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- we're way past six months. And then it says it's abandoned, and they're supposed to be doing -- have done some letters. And then it states at the end of that paragraph A that I guess they can come in and say considered by the building official that the project has not -- and evidently the building official is not willing to look at any hardship. And then when you go to B it Page 50 November 29, 20n 1 16J 2 says the contractor /owner on the last sentence shall have the burden of establishing that the project has not been abandoned or suspended and the board should reverse the decision of the building official. So this is real -- this section is really dealing with permit intent. And I assume if he got a permit back in '76 that they're only -- they're not good forever, I wouldn't think. MS. RAWSON: I don't -- I think they're not good within six months. VOICE IN AUDIENCE: Fifteen years. MS. GODFREY: Is the house complete -- is it 60 percent completed? MR. LETOURNEAU: I think it says during any six -month period fails to actively be engaged in construction and fails to complete at least 60 percent of the construction, that would be considered average for the industry for that 6 -month time. I don't think it's 60 percent. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. So what -- what we're seeing now is not 60 percent of a house; right? MR. PHILLIPS: I'll second -- MR. LEHMANN: 104.6.12, same paragraph, A, it states specifically, permit abandonment shall be deemed to have occurred if a required inspection has not been requested or satisfactorily completed within a six -month period. MR. LETOURNEAU: That's what we've got. MR. LEHMANN: So, I mean, just with that sentence alone, we have permit abandonment. MS. RAWSON: Correct. MS. GODFREY: It also says if -- due to unavailability of construction supplies or materials. What about his unable to get power to the house? MR. LEHMANN: It says specifically increased cost of building Page 51 November 29, 01 J materials or supplies or financial hardship shall not be considered by the building official as evidence that the project has not been abandoned or suspended. This particular code section in paragraph B goes on to say, the owner -- the owner only has 15 days to appeal the building official's decision. MS. GODFREY: Okay. MR. LEHMANN: So at some time in the past it was considered abandoned; no appeal was filed. It's still considered abandoned. MS. GODFREY: Okay. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: My -- my question is that with this specific paragraph that he's been cited, it's an abandonment. So the paragraph doesn't give him the option of going to get a new permit. And so that's why I'm saying if -- for us to come up with an order to come in compliance with this, since this is the violation, there's no way to come in compliance with this. This is specifically abandonment. I'm -- I'm looking for a way to -- what do we have him do? MS. ARNOLD: Well, if -- normally when someone abandons something or the -- they fail to request inspections and the permit is then voided, they have the ability to reapply for a building permit and -- and to complete the job. It -- it just depends on what the property owner wants to do. Does he want to continue the construction or he wants to remove the structure? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. RAWSON: I think those are the two things that you can tell him to do. MS. DUSEK: That -- that last sentence in B where it says the contractor /owner shall have the burden of establishing that the project has not been abandoned or suspended and that the board shall reverse the decision of the building official, I think that if -- by our order would allow him to do that. Page 52 November 29, 200 16J 2 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. I just want us to be specific in what we're ordering him to do and for what reason. MS. DUSEK: I think he has to obtain a building permit more than just apply. MR. PHILLIPS: Or demolish the structure. MR. LEHMANN: Mr. Chairman, is your concern the fact that we are maybe citing an incorrect code section as the violation? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That's probably not the incorrect code section, but there probably should have been a couple other ones. So I'm looking for us not to say obtain a building permit. I think it should be a broad sentence that the respondent needs to come in compliance with the Collier County code or ordinance, which I don't know if 98 -76 requires the actual issuance of a permit or not but rather than -- I think it should be a statement something like that, that he come into compliance with the ordinance, a specific paragraph of the ordinance and/or remove the structure. MS. DUSEK: By obtaining -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: By obtaining whatever is required. Don't be specific. Whatever is required, because it may be more than just, you know, a permit. I don't know. Just come in compliance with the ordinance within X days, and then -- and I don't have any problem with whether it's 30 or 60. I don't know which is more realistic. Staff recommended 60. I would -- evidently for a reason. So I'd say that's probably more realistic. MS. DUSEK: It would seem to me obtaining a building permit, what he has to go through to get that, brings him into the compliance. MR. LEHMANN: Miss Rawson -- MS. RAWSON: Yes. MR. LEHMANN: Miss Rawson, are we able to write our order to say that we order the respondent to achieve code compliance within 60 days? Is that a narrow enough -- Page 53 November 29, 2001 MS. RAWSON: Well, that's pretty broad. 16J z MR. LEHMANN: That's a very broad order. MS. RAWSON: I think there's only two ways he can come into compliance. That is that they give him a building permit, he continue building his structure or that he tears it down. What else can he do? MS. SAUNDERS: I think the staff really said it very well where it sounds to me like we're analyzing and critiquing the law. And I -- I've got to rely on the staff and the staff s attorneys to say that this is how we're supposed to do it. I don't think it's our job -- our job, really, to critique the law, to tweak it. If the staff and the attorneys tell us this is legal, this is how we're interpreting the codes, then I trust that. So I -- I go with the staff recommendation. MS. DUSEK: I agree with that also. MR. PONTE: Me too. MR. LEHMANN: Do we have a motion? MS. DUSEK: We don't have a motion yet. MR. LEHMANN: Then I would so move that in this case we follow staff s recommendation, the CEB orders the respondent to pay all operations costs incurred in the prosecution of this case and obtain a building permit or remove structure within 60 days or a fine of $50 per day be imposed for each day the violation continues. MS. SAUNDERS: I'll second that. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Operational costs? MR. LEHMANN: It's already in there. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. I didn't hear you say that. We have a motion and a second. MS. SAUNDERS: We did finding of fact, didn't we? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes, ma'am. We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. Page 54 November 29, 2001 16J 2 Unanimous response.) ( p ) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you. Mr. Dwyer, do you understand, sir? MR. DWYER: Yes, I do. But I didn't -- I didn't quite get about the inspections. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Forget inspections. Our order is just telling you that you've got to come in compliance in 60 days by getting a permit, period. Inspections is not part of our order. MR. DWYER: I understand that. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Next case, BCC versus Eric B. Bertelsen. Am I saying that correctly? MS. CRUZ: Yes. Let the record show that the respondent is not present. I'd like to request that the packet that was -- that was provided to the respondent be admitted into evidence marked Composite Exhibit A, please. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I'll entertain a motion to accept the county's exhibit. MR. LEHMANN: So moved. MS. GODFREY: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second to accept county's exhibit. All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you. MS. CRUZ: This is Case No. 2001 -084, Board of County Commissioners versus Eric B. Bertelsen. The violation brought before this board is Section 2.6.7.1.1 and Section 2.6.7.2.1 of Page 55 November 29, 20D 1 16J 2 Ordinance No. 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code. This violation describes as illegal storage of an -- unlicensed recreational vehicles in a residential -zoned area. The violation exists at 4415 Lorraine Avenue, Naples, Florida, and is more particularly described as Coconut Creek, Unit 3, Block B, Lot 12. The owner of record is Eric B. Bertelsen. Address of record is 4415 Lorraine Avenue, Naples, Florida. The violation was observed on August 31st, 2001. Two notice of violation were provided to the respondent, one dated August 31 st with a compliance date of September 1st, 2001. The second one was provided on September 18th, 2001, with a correction date of September 22nd, 2001. As of today, the violation remains. I turn the case over to Investigator David Repicky. (The oath was administered.) MR. REPICKY: My name is Dave Repicky, Collier County code enforcement investigator. On August 31st, 2001, I was on patrol in the Coconut Creek area on Lorraine Avenue. I observed a large RV and a boat in the front yard on -- this address here of Mr. Bertelsen, 4415 Lorraine Avenue. The RV at the time was unlicensed. I knocked on the door, spoke to Mr. Meyer who stated he was Mr. Bertelsen's roommate. I then issued a notice of violation to Mr. Meyer for Mr. Bertelsen. He said he would let Mr. Bertelsen know about the violation. I explained in detail about the violation, how the vehicles need to be stored and that the RV needed to have a -- needed to have a license plate on -- on it, a good, current tag on the vehicle at that time. September 14th I went for a recheck. The violation still existed with one exception. The RV did have a valid tag on it at the time. Page 56 November 29, 2 1 16J 2 Nobody was home. I had no contact with Mr. Bertelsen or his roommate, Mr. Meyer. At that time I sent certified mail, notice of violation to Mr. Bertelsen, which was received by him, and we did receive the return receipt that he did receive it. On September 15th and October 2nd, I did two more rechecks. The violations still remained. October 17th the violations still remained on another -- another recheck. The -- the only exception was the RV had been moved. The boat is still present. As of yesterday and today, this morning, you can see the boat -- it's not a very clear picture. I apologize for that. But the boat -- the boat still does remain. And I've had no contact with Mr. Bertelsen. MR. PONTE: Investigator, just a clarification: Did you say the RV had been moved or removed? MR. REPICKY: It has been removed. MR. PONTE: Removed. Thank you. MS. DUSEK: So since the motor home has been removed, then, we're going to be taking Section 2.6.7.1.1 out? Are you ready for a motion, Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I have a que -- I'm trying to think of the proper question. Investigator, you haven't -- you haven't had any contact with the owner, Mr. Bertelsen; correct? MR. REPICKY: No, sir, I have not. I have stopped by on early mornings on our early flex day. Nobody's answered the door. I stopped by in the afternoons. Nobody's at -- the only contact I've ever had was with Mr. Meyer at the residence. MS. DUSEK: When you had contact with Mr. Meyer, did he say, in fact, that Mr. Bertelsen lives there? MR. REPICKY: Yes, ma'am. Between that and his girlfriend's house. He did live -- his primary residence was right there on Lorraine Avenue. Page 57 4 November 29, 2001 16J CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. The motor home is, in fact, gone. MR. REPICKY: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: So now we're down to the -- MR. REPICKY: The boat on the trailer. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: And the trailer -- the trailer doesn't have a license or does or it's just there? MR. REPICKY: The trailer does have a license for the boat. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: It's just on his property? MR. REPICKY: Yes, sir. MS. DUSEK: Are we set, Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes, ma'am. MS. DUSEK: Okay. I make a motion in the case of the Board of County Commissioners for Collier County versus Eric B. Bertelsen in the case CEB 2001 -084, that there is a violation. The violation is of Section 2.6.7.2.1 of Ordinance 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code. MR. LEHMANN: I'll second that motion. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion -- MS. SAUNDERS: I think what you just noted was the violation for the motor home rather than the boat. MR. LEHMANN: No, Section 1.1 is for the motor home. Section 2.1 is for the boat. MS. SAUNDERS: Oh, okay. I'm sorry. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second that there, in fact, exists a violation. Any further question? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) Page 58 November 29, 2001 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Order of the board -- 16J 2 I'm sorry. You may sit down, sir. MS. SAUNDERS: I move that we accept staff s recommendation as stated. MS. DUSEK: The only thing is for the unlicensed vehicle, there -- it's been removed. MR. PONTE: I also think that indicates some attempt to comply and that $50 per day is a bit stiff for simply parking a boat in your driveway. And I think that $25 would be sufficiently -- MR. LEHMANN: My sheet, staff s recommendation is $25. Oh, it is. MS. DUSEK: It's 25 each violation. So it would be. And now it's just one violation. MR. LEHMANN: Do we have a motion that is partially the way through? MR. PONTE: I'm sorry? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: No. We don't have a motion at all yet. MR. LEHMANN: Then I would move that CEB order the respondent to pay all operational costs in the prosecution of this case and store unpermitted vehicles or unlicensed vehicles as required per ordinance and remove the same within 15 days or a fine of $25 per day be imposed each day the violation continues. MS. SAUNDERS: I'll second that. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second for an order to pay operational costs, plus correct the violation within 15 days, or pay a fine of $25 per day thereafter. Any further question? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Opposed? Page 59 November 29, 27 1 bJ 2 (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you. Next case, BCC versus Wayne Simpson and Lester Redmond. MS. CRUZ: Yes, sir. Let the record show that Mr. Lester Redmond is present, Mr. Wayne Simpson is not. I'd like to request that the packet provided to the respondent and to the board be admitted into evidence marked Composite Exhibit A. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Mr. Simpson, did you get a package from the county? MR. REDMOND: Redmond. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: You're Redmond? MR. REDMOND: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you. I'd entertain a motion to accept the county's exhibit. MR. LEHMANN: So moved. MS. DUSEK: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second to accept the county's exhibit. All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) MS. CRUZ: The violation brought before this board on Case No. 2001 -085, Board of County Commissioners versus Wayne Simpson and Lester Redmond, it's Section -- it's violation of Section 1.5.6, 2.1.159 2.7.6, paragraphs 1 and 5; Section 2.6.7.1 of Ordinance No. 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code; and Section 6, 7, and 8 of Ordinance No. 99 -51, the Collier County Weed and Litter Ordinance. The violation describes as a stilt -type structure constructed without obtaining a Collier County building permit; litter consisting of but not limited to miscellaneous materials, such as metal scraps, plastic, paper, wood, tires; and also storage of vehicle parts, vehicle frames, motors, transmission, building materials, air -type tanks, steel Page 60 November 29, 2001 6 ` 2 boats, mechanic -type tools and equipment, and storage of unlicensed vehicles all on unimproved property. These violations exist at 2752 State Street, Immokalee, Florida. It is more particularly described as Section 20, Township 46, Range 29, the north 75 feet of the south 576.15 feet of the east 135.18 feet of the east quarter of the southwest quarter of the northeast quarter. The owner of record, Wayne Simpson and Lester Redmond. Violations were first observed on March 20th, 2001. Notice of violations were provided to the respondents on May 5th -- 8th, 2 -- 2001, with a correction date of June 10th, 2001. A second notice of violation was provided to the respondents dated August 6, 2001, with a correction date of September 15, 2001. The violation remains as of yesterday. I'll turn the case over to Gary Dantini. (The oath was administered.) MR. DANTINI: For the record -- good morning. For the record, my name is Gary Dantini, Collier County code enforcement investigator. And excuse me, but I'm just getting over a code -- cold. So if I break up a little bit here, it's because of that. And I apologize. On March 20th I went to the location and observed numerous violations of litter, vehicles, and parts around the property and went back to the office, investigated the structure also to find out if there was a permit for that, and there was no permit issued for that structure as it stood. In fact, the property had been taxed as unimproved property; to this day it has been. I made a notice of violation to a Wayne Simpson and sent it to the address of record that he had with the county. The notice was returned unsigned, and the letter was -- was returned to us. I talked to Mr. Lester Raymond -- Redmond. Excuse me. I'm sorry, sir -- about the property. And he stated that -- that he was the owner of the property, apparently that in -- in '78 there was a contract with -- with Wayne Simpson for five years and that he had paid that Page 61 November 29, 16J 2 and he was trying to get a quitclaim deed from Mr. Simpson through a lawyer. And as of this day there still has not been any quitclaim deed, and it's still -- the property is owned by Wayne Simpson. I did issue a notice of violation to Mr. Redmond. I had to do drop service to him. He did refuse to sign. Courteously, though, he did refuse to sign. And I also posted the property in the proper ways, the property at the courthouse. We did a -- Mr. Redmond did let us do a structural inspection on the building. Inspector Dick Newman, did an inspection of the building and found the building to be a sturdy building but is not up to code. So it's in violation, of course, with the county because of the fact that it does not have a -- a permit and it is not built to code. And I went out to the property this morning. And, as you see, Mr. Redmond had cleaned up most of the -- the property in the front portion of -- of -- of the land. But in the very back part is stored an awful lot of equipment still back there, parts and steel and -- and vehicles. And -- but he did clean up about 60 percent of what -- what the litter was. But there's still a violation of -- litter violation there. And we still have the structure on site without a permit. MS. DUSEK: I'm confused. I'm not sure who owns the property. MR. DANTINI: Right. MS. DUSEK: Mr. Simpson owns it, but you've cited four people. MR. DANTINI: Yes. MS. DUSEK: Why are we citing Mr. Redmond? MR. DANTINI: Because Mr. Simpson claims that's his property, his materials, and everything that's on there, that's his. MS. DUSEK: But the owner of record is Mr. Simpson. MR. DANTINI: That's correct. And I also did a notice of violation to him. But he is nowhere to be found. Apparently the last Page 62 November 29, 2001 16 J 2 five years he's disappeared. MR. PONTE: Investigator, I'm a little confused on -- on that. In the executive summary it says Mr. Simpson did, however, agree to let a county structural building inspector inspect the structure. MR. DANTINI: Okay. MR. PONTE: I guess that is a mistype. MR. DANTINI: Yeah, that's a mistype. MR. PONTE: But then it says since Mr. Simpson refused to sign -- I'm confused as to the players. Where is Mr. Simpson? MR. DANTINI: Again, that should have been Mr. Redmond. I'm sorry. MR. PONTE: So Mr. Redmond refused to sign? MR. DANTINI: Yes. I had to do drop service at that point. MS. GODFREY: Investigator, you have pictures of expired tags on an older truck, but yet it says December of 2001. MR. DANTINI: Oh, that. That was just an example of some of the vehicles that were on -- MS. GODFREY: Okay. MR. DANTINI: Yeah. Those are general pictures of all the vehicles that were there. MS. GODFREY: Oh. Because you have the truck with the expired tag, but it's December of 2001. It's a collectible. MR. DANTINI: Yeah. No. If you look at the -- MS. GODFREY: Expired tags on all the truck s. MR. DANTINI: -- this red tag -- red truck right here on the monitor, that was one of the vehicles that didn't have a tag on it. MS. GODFREY: Oh. MR. PONTE: Of the vehicles and materials that were in the front yard -- MR. DANTINI: Uh -huh. MR. PONTE: -- 60 percent have been moved or removed or Page 63 November 29, 2001 dust put in the back. 16S 2 A MR. DANTINI: Well, I would say 60 percent of it was removed and -- MR. PONTE: Off site? MR. DANTINI: Off site. And the remainder portions of it were put in the rear of it. MR. PONTE: Okay. MR. DANTINI: And the remaining vehicles that -- I was not able to obtain to see if the licenses were current on the remaining vehicles. He had posted no trespassing. MR. PONTE: Is there a business being conducted here, I mean, a storage business or a repair business or -- MR. DANTINI: Mr. Redmond says no. MS. DUSEK: Miss Rawson, if the owner of record is Mr. Simpson, can we site Mr. Redmond also? MS. RAWSON: Yes, we can. He's like a tenant at this point in time. MS. DUSEK: Okay. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any other questions for the investigator? MR. PONTE: Just one other. The property taxes are being paid by Mr. Redmond? MR. DANTINI: That's correct. MR. PONTE: And have been for five years; is that correct? MR. DANTINI: I've just checked the last couple years. That's all that I know of that he's paid. MR. PONTE: Thanks. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any additional questions? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you, sir. MR. DANTINI: Thank you. Page 64 November 29, 20 6 2 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Mr. Redmond, your turn, sir. (The oath was administered.) MR. REDMOND: I was not under the impression that I live on residential ag. Most of this equipment's left are tractor parts. I'm a tinkerer. And as far as motors, I drag race. And I just can't see where the big problem is. I'm -- I'm trying to bring everything up and -- and, you know, the building -- the building has been there for 30 years. I told them I'd bring it up to code if they would allow me a permit to do so. And since then I'm wasting my time talking to them. And I just -- I don't know what else to do. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well -- huh. Yeah, I don't know if you can get a permit since you're not a, quote, legal owner. That's probably where your problem is, until you solve your ownership problem. MR. REDMOND: Yeah. I have a lawyer -- I have had three lawyers working on this, and I've done paid lawyer fees more than I've paid for the property. And -- and I'm under the impression that unimproved land is agriculture. And as far as tractor parts, I'm a tinkerer. I put this stuff together, and -- MS. DUSEK: Mr. Redmond, if -- you said you've obtained a few attorneys. Do you have any case pending? MR. REDMOND: As far as I know, I still do, trying to get a legal document of the property. I've tried several occasions to get ahold of Wayne Simpson, and he's -- had moved to Georgia. As far as I know, the guy is dead by now, as far as I know. And it seems to me he -- I paid him. He skipped town with my deed, and I just can't -- MS. GODFREY: Mr. Redmond, we have a picture here that is Lester's Welder's Repair, Gas, and Diesel; acetylene torches in the garage here for welding, major welding? MR. REDMOND: No, ma'am. That's personal property, Page 65 November 29, 2011 6 2 acetylene torches. I was going into business for myself at one time. I work for C &B Farms now, and I never did take the stickers off. But I have removed them since I got a notice, you know. MS. GODFREY: But you were getting ready to go into business and -- MR. REDMOND: At one time I got a better deal, so I work for C &B Farms in Clewiston. I never did take them off. I didn't -- the DOT didn't see no problem with them, you know, so I didn't -- but now there was a problem, so I took them off. MS. GODFREY: Okay. MR. LEHMANN: Miss Arnold, do we have any record as to what the zoning classification is, the zoning district for this property? MS. ARNOLD: It's agriculturally zoned with a mobile home overlay. MS. GODFREY: Now, if you have agriculture, don't you have to have two goats or a cow or something on it? MS. ARNOLD: No. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Oh, God. MS. SAUNDERS: A tomato plant. MS. ARNOLD: In this particular case the primary structure can be a single - family home or a mobile home because of the overlay district. MR. REDMOND: This building, it's a storage barn. There's no electricity, no plumbing to it. I have books and stuff that I keep in it and a few odds and ends and stuff like that. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Miss Arnold -- I don't know how to word this. Let's make the assumption that, as Mr. Redmond said, this is all his stuff and he just tinkers with it when he wants. That's, you know, whether we might think of it as some other class. Is he allowed to keep it, or does he have to put it under a building, or -- or is the county just considering you're not allowed to leave it sitting in Page 66 November 29, 20"1 16J 2 your yard? I mean, help me out here. MS. ARNOLD: It's -- it should probably be in an enclosed or -- you know, area so that it's not just laying all over the yard. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: So, in other words, even though it's behind a fence, it has to be under some kind of roof? That's what you're saying? MS. ARNOLD: Yeah, it could be -- since this is a stilt structure, if it's under the carport area, then that probably would suffice. MR. REDMOND: I'm sorry. This -- this is wrong. She's got a picture. There's a guy lives down the road from me, has 20 acres hisself. It's not under no building. So that -- it has to be wrong. You know what I mean? You know, I'm just saying -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I'm just looking for some -- MR. REDMOND: Why does my tractor have to be under a storage shed and 20 acres of tractors laying out in the field? I don't -- you know, I can't -- I'm at a loss. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I understand your statement. It's something I -- I'm not able to address. That's why I was asking the question that try and find us some relief. MR. REDMOND: I have pictures to show you that I'm not lying. And they know it already. So I don't understand why I'm up here. MS. ARNOLD: I believe the investigator opened this not just for a tractor. There was other material stored around the property, and he can answer that question better than I because I -- I haven't been out there. MS. DUSEK: Well, it's suggesting litter, metal scraps, plastic paper -- MS. ARNOLD: Right. MS. DUSEK: -- different things, not just the tractor. MR. REDMOND: Well, that's gone. Page 67 November 29, 20 G (J MS. DUSEK: Most of that's gone, Inspector Dantini? MR. DANTINI: Yeah. There's still about 40 percent as you can see in this picture right here that he's -- still has about 40 percent of the land area filled with different parts. Some of it's covered with canvas, so I couldn't tell what it was that was underneath that. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: But these could be parts that he's tinkering with. MR. DANTINI: It could be. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Could be. MR. DANTINI: It could be. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I mean, that's -- I don't know how we make that determination -- MR. DANTINI: Well, but if -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- but it could be. MR. DANTINI: If you look through some of the other pictures that were done in the same location there, they're in the same piles. There were generally just litter. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MR. DANTINI: And so I had to go with that assumption that since he covered it, that it was still just litter. MS. DUSEK: I have a question on the Section 2.1.15. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Do we have any more questions for Mr. Redmond at this time? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you, sir. You can sit down. MS. DUSEK: Where you cited him for that and you haven't specified which numbers, because if I'm looking at it correctly, one of them says roadside sales. MR. DANTINI: No. 4, storage and display. And the No. 1, any use or structure not specifically permitted in a zoning district, is permitted use. Page 68 November 29, 200i6J 2 MS. DUSEK: Okay. So 1 and 4 of the section? MR. DANTINI: Right. MS. DUSEK: And, Miss Rawson, the structure, can he as a so- called tenant get a permit? MS. RAWSON: No. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: No. MS. DUSEK: So what does he have -- I mean, it sounds like he has to take it down if he can't -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: No. He can't take down somebody else's property. MS. RAWSON: Right. He can't take down somebody else's property, and he can't get a permit. What he has to do is what he's apparently doing, and that is pursuing legal action to get the title deeded into his name which he can do with a quiet -title action or whatever. MS. DUSEK: But how can we -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Wait. You can't cite him for the building, because it's not his building. MS. DUSEK: I understand. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: You can cite him for the litter. MS. DUSEK: That's what I'm concerned about because we're asking about the stilt -type structure. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: What -- what we have to do is, you're going to have to cite one of these gentlemen as the owner of record, because that's all there is to date, with -- let's just assume, for this 5 seconds, all the violations. You can then cite the, quote, unquote, tenant at this 5 seconds with certain violations, the stilt house not being one of them because he doesn't own the property or the house. So -- MS. DUSEK: So we can -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: You're going to have to -- it will be Page 69 November 29, 20'16J 2 basically two orders: one to Mr. Simpson, one to Mr. Redmond, and they will read differently because different sections apply. MS. DUSEK: Okay. MR. LEHMANN: Miss Arnold, in the agricultural -zoned district that Mr. Redmond's place is at, is it permitted to store the type of materials that he is storing in the manner in which he is storing them? MR. DANTINI: Can I answer that question? MR. LEHMANN: Yes, please. MR. DANTINI: Gary Dantini, for the record. Just before I came here I went and talked to the planning department. And they said if -- if it is not used as an agricultural purpose, in other words, if the -- he isn't using the land around where the material is stored -- excuse me -- then it would be a violation because it is not -- the intent is not for the use of agricultural uses. MR. LEHMANN: Even though Mr. Redmond says he is repairing tractors, for instance, it could be a lawn tractor; it could be a farm tractor. And so -- MR. DANTINI: But that's not all tractor -- there isn't a tractor on the property that I saw. MR. LEHMANN: I see -- I see a lot of trucks and motor vehicles, but you do see some tractor tires in there. MR. DANTINI: Yeah, storage. But it -- it still -- he's not using the tractor for the property. Yes. And also it is still considered unimproved property. MR. LEHMANN: So technically he couldn't store anything there. MR. DANTINI: That's correct. MS. DUSEK: I just need to backtrack a second. MR. DANTINI: Sure. MS. DUSEK: Did you say that the unlicensed vehicles had been Page 70 November 29, 2T 1 6J 2 removed? MR. DANTINI: The ones that I -- I witnessed before. I couldn't tell by the ones that are on there now. I could not read the license on it because I could not get on the property, so I don't know if they have license or not. MS. DUSEK: So how are we treating that if we don't know for sure in the citing of one of the sections - -. MR. DANTINI: Well -- MS. DUSEK: -- of unlicensed vehicles? MR. DANTINI: -- there is one for sure that I know it is not. It's the same vehicle that I have seen before, this truck right here (indicating). It's in -- MS. DUSEK: Okay. So at least there's one. MR. DANTINI: And there is one other one, if I can -- this green vehicle right here (indicating), this -- you see the back end of that truck on page 25, you see the front end of that vehicle. And that is a - - an unlicensed vehicle also. That's another one that was on there. So there are some vehicles left that are unlicensed. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Basically what the board can do is, you can cite both parties pulling out the things that have been complied with for the exact same things, except Mr. Redmond can't be cited for the building. That's the only thing you could pull out for Mr. Redmond. Everything else would apply, if it's still there. So the building is the only thing we couldn't cite Mr. Redmond for because it's not his land, it's not his building, as presented by the record. And, you know, taking into consideration what he's trying to do, that would have to be down the road. But that's what you would have to pull out, the board would have to do, just leave that one -- anything that applies to the stilt -type structure without the permit, that would not apply to Mr. Redmond. Everything else would apply if it still exists. Page 71 November 29, 2� MS. DUSEK: Okay. I'd like to make a motion, if we're ready. MR. PONTE: Ready. MS. DUSEK: And I guess I would do this in two different motions, Miss Rawson? MS. RAWSON: You can do it in the same motion. You're just going to require different respondents to comply in different ways. MS. DUSEK: Okay. In the case of the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, versus Wayne Simpson and Lester Redmond, in the case of CEB No. 2001 -085, I find that there is a violation. The violation against Mr. Simpson is of Section 1.5.6, 2.1.15, Section 1 and 4 of that, 2.7.6, Part 1 of that and 5, 2.6.7.1.1 of Ordinance 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code, and Section 6, 7, and 8 of Ordinance No. 99 -51, the Collier County Weed and Litter Ordinance. For Mr. Redmond, the violation is of Section 1.5.6, 2.1.15, Part 4, and Section 2.7.6, 1 and 5, 2.6.7.1.1 of Ordinance No. 91 -102, the Collier Coun -- County Land Development Code, and Sections 6, 7, and 8 of Ordinance No. 99 -51, the Collier County Weed and Litter Ordinance. MR. LEHMANN: I'll second that motion. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Have we got the right sections, Miss Rawson, for each? MS. RAWSON: The only one that Mr. Simpson can abate is, according to the stilt -type structure without a permit. Mr. Redmond can't do that one. Mr. Redmond can do all of the rest. MS. DUSEK: That's why I left out in Section 2.1.15, No. 1, because that pertains to the structure. MS. RAWSON: Okay. MS. DUSEK: So I left that one out. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well, but 2 -- let's see. I've got to go back. Page 72 November 29, 200 _ t 6 �+ 2 MS. DUSEK: Well, actually, maybe -- we're looking at 2.7.6 -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- 2.7.6.1. MS. DUSEK: -- 1. You're correct. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: He can't do and -- MS. DUSEK: That's right. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: And 4 -5 -- 2.7.6 he can't do at all because it all deals with building permits. MS. DUSEK: Right. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: And he's not an owner. MS. DUSEK: That's correct. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I just want to make sure we do -- we don't impose something on him that he has no control over. MS. DUSEK: That was an oversight in mine -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. That's why I asked the question, just so we can make sure. MR. LEHMANN: Miss Dusek, do you amend your motion? MS. DUSEK: I do amend it. And I'm not sure, Miss Rawson, looking at No. 5 in 2.7.6, improvement of property prohibitive prior to issuance of building permit, should that be left out? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes. MS. DUSEK: So perhaps we should leave out that 2.7.6. MS. RAWSON: 2.7.6 as to this respondent. MS. DUSEK: So as to Mr. Redmond, I'm amending the motion to take out 2.7.6, 1 and 5, and I've already taken out No. 1 on 2.1.15. MR. LEHMANN: And I'll second the amended motion. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. We have a motion and a second that, in fact, a violation exists, both for Mr. Simpson and for Mr. Redmond. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. Page 73 November 29, 2001 (Unanimous response.) 16J 2 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you. Order of the board. MS. DUSEK: Now, once again, I have this concern about how we can order Mr. Simpson to do anything when we know that we can't find him. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well, but -- MS. DUSEK: The burden is put completely on Mr. Redmond, so I think when we make a recommendation, that somehow -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well, but we've done that before. You -- you make the order, and -- and if the person doesn't comply, then the fines start. And then after a certain period of time, which, I believe, is three months, we could then instruct the county to start, you know, foreclosure proceedings. MS. DUSEK: That's right. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: In the meantime, I'm sure Mr. Simpson -- or Mr. Redmond is trying diligently to get property he thought he bought under his control. And then he would have the right to come back and say, excuse me, I'm now the owner, and give me some time to do something. But right now, I think what we have to do is do the order, as we have done all other orders, and establish what we want done by whom, by what date, and/or a fine starts, and then wait to see what happens before we try to second -guess something. MS. DUSEK: For example, who's going to pay the operational costs, or is that going to be divided, or are they both -- that's where I'm having a problem. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well, I mean, the operational costs, in essence, if -- if you had two orders -- and basically that's what we're Page 74 November 29, 20010J 2 doing -- you can divide the operational costs. Mr. Redmond being around could pay his part. Mr. Simpson's part, which wouldn't be paid, would then be applied to the uncollected fines and such should foreclosure procedures be started. That's typical. That's -- that's not out of line. MS. DUSEK: In the staff s recommendation, I'm a little uneasy with $100 per day. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That's a recommendation. What you need to do is make your recommendation to the board to see how the rest of the board feels. We don't always follow staffs recommendation. MS. DUSEK: I understand. I'm just making that comment in the event that someone is going to make a motion. Well, I'll make a motion unless Rhona or someone else -- MS. SAUNDERS: You go ahead. MR. LEHMANN: We're going to let you do the dirty work. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: You're doing fine. MS. DUSEK: I make -- make a motion that we order Mr. Simpson to pay half of the operational costs incurred in the prosecution of this case and obtain proper permits, if obtainable, or remove structure and remove all litter within 45 days or a fine of $50 per day be imposed each day each violation continues. That's No. 1. And I guess we should look at that first, or should I go ahead with the other? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Miss Rawson, do we need to do them -- I mean, it's all going to be it in one order. Is it easier to do it individually or can we just -- MS. RAWSON: Whatever, the pleasure of the board. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. RAWSON: You can go ahead and now that you've made your recommendation or proposal about Mr. Simpson's Page 75 November 29, 2001 responsibility, you can go ahead with Mr. Redmond's. 16J 2 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yeah. And just do one approval. MS. DUSEK: Okay. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay? MS. DUSEK: Well, I make a motion that -- for Mr. Redmond that he pay half of the operational costs incurred in the prosecution of this case and remove all litter within 45 days or a fine of $50 per day will be imposed on this violation if it continues. MS. ARNOLD: How many days did you give Mr. -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Forty -five. MS. DUSEK: Forty -five. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. We have a motion for the costs to be split among the two parties. The time limit is 45 days for each party. Mr. Redmond is not involved in obtaining any kind of permits. And the fine for both parties is 50 -- $50 per day for noncompliance. MS. SAUNDERS: I'll second that. MS. DUSEK: You know, I'm just going to make a comment about this, my same motion. What bothers me is that this structure may be a fine structure, and it's possible that it could be brought to code and be left there. And because we can't find Mr. Simpson and we're not allowing him due process with his cases, Mr. Redmond, in getting ownership, I feel so uncomfortable about the fact that if he can't obtain permits, which we know is not going to happen -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Ownership of the property for us is in Mr. Simpson's hands. MS. DUSEK: Yes. I realize that. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well, I mean -- MS. DUSEK: That's what's bothering me. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I understand that. But, unfortunately, that can't reflect what we do. MS. DUSEK: Well, I'm -- Page 76 November 29, 2Q0 16J 2 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Because we have no way to help Mr. Redmond, since he's not an owner. That's not within our purview to try and help him because we have no way to do that. MS. DUSEK: Well, my concern is that he's trying to get ownership. Are we allowing enough time so that in the event that no -- Mr. Simpson is around, that we're allowing Mr. Redmond enough time in that 45 -day period? MR. LEHMANN: Should conditions change on Mr. Redmond's part, such as he would proceed with a civil action or something else, he can always come before this board and ask for an order to be amended. We can always reduce it if we want to. We cannot add to; we can reduce. MS. DUSEK: I realize we can reduce. I'm concerned about the building being demolished. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Well, we haven't told anybody to demolish it. We've told Mr. Simpson to come into compliance. If Mr. Simpson doesn't come into compliance -- no one is going to demolish the building. MS. DUSEK: Well, it says remove structure. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: If Mr. Simpson doesn't get permits or demolish the building, as the owner, he has that right unless Mr. Redmond can somehow prove that he is the owner. So right now, Mr. Simpson, should he appear in this order issued, he can demolish the structure or get permits, period. MS. SAUNDERS: If I understand -- MR. PONTE: And what happens to Mr. Redmond in the event that he does get control of the structure in due course, and how does all of this apply? There would be a lien against the property because it was Mr. Simpson's. And, yet, it really isn't all Mr. Simpson's. It's very complicated -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I understand it's complicated. But Page 77 November 29, 1 0 J 2 until he gets control of the property, I don't think he was buying half of it. I think he was probably buying all of it. If he gets all of it, I would think at that period of time if there's some type of a lien on the property because of Mr. Simpson, that he would have a reasonable case for his attorney to go to the county and explain, gee, I've been fighting for 15 years to get my piece of property, and it's taken me this long, and you've liened it because of this and -- I think all that can be worked out, and the lien would probably be lifted. And then we would be -- in this particular case, the order of the board to get permits and/or demolish to Mr. Simpson -- if he turns out not to be the owner, then the county would have to bring that part of their violation back to us against Mr. Redmond. And then we could then say, now, Mr. Redmond, since you're the owner, you need to get the permits and/or demolish the structure. But you need to deal with what is existing today. And today Mr. Simpson owns the property. What might be really is unimportant. You can only be governed by facts. Facts are Mr. Simpson owns the property. We have to tell him to do something. If that doesn't occur under the ordinance and the statutes, the only thing that we could do is that if he doesn't come into compliance in three months, instruct the county to start foreclosure procedures, and they can make that determination whether they want to do it or not. MS. DUSEK: Miss Rawson, in looking at the warranty deed -- MS. RAWSON: Yes. MS. DUSEK: -- with the Xs on there and the scratched -out names and etc., is this legal to have it like that where it says the grantor to Wayne Simpson and then it's crossed out, and then there's another name crossed out and the address written in? Once it's notarized, are you allowed to go back and fool with the deed? MS. RAWSON: Well, the answer to the latter question is, no, you're not supposed to do that. But I'm looking at a deed from Lester Page 78 November 29, 20 16J 2 Redmond and Marie Redmond to Wayne Simpson. Is that the one you're talking about? MS. DUSEK: No. Because -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: No. That's the contract for sale. That's not a deed. MS. DUSEK: That's the contract for land sale. Then we were given a deed this morning, and on this deed there's scratched -out names and things written in after it was notarized. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I don't think that was -- if I had to guess, since that's Miss Jenkins' signature, I think she signed in the wrong place because if you look at the signature that's scratched out and the signature on the bottom, they're fairly close to the same. I think she probably signed in the wrong place. MS. RAWSON: I'm looking at the deed that you're talking about now. It's fine. I don't have any problem with it. MS. DUSEK: Okay. MS. GODFREY: It's initialed also. MR. LEHMANN: Miss Rawson, just a point of clarification. If this board cites an owner with an order and then the owner sells the property, does that order get transferred to the new owner? MS. RAWSON: Well, it's going to lien on the property, as you know, which runs with the land. MR. LEHMANN: For -- forget the lien. The lien hasn't occurred yet. The order -- let's say we give an order for nine months and the respondent sells the property after four months so there is no lien because we haven't fined yet. Does that order to take care of what -- whatever the board asked for, does that carry through? Does it transfer through to the new owner? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes. MS. RAWSON: Yes. And that happens sometimes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: And that's -- then the new owner can Page 79 November 29, 2r 6 f 2 go back to the old owner and say, you didn't inform me of this problem. MR. LEHMANN: All right. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Are we back -- MS. DUSEK: Yeah, I have one more question. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. DUSEK: I'm still questioning my own motion. Let's say that Mr. Simpson is found and he's going to get building permit. Is 45 days a reasonable time for someone to get the building permits? MS. ARNOLD: Well -- MS. DUSEK: Earlier we gave a 60 -day to the earlier person. MS. ARNOLD: Right. MS. DUSEK: And I wonder if I should amend this to read 60 days for the building permits. MS. ARNOLD: It -- it's probably safer to go with a longer amount of time because I'm assuming that no structural drawings have -- have been done on this particular structure. It just was installed without submitting anything to the county because there's no evidence that there's any permits. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Let -- let me just -- Bobby, for a sake of -- I won't say expediency, but based on the testimony we received, obviously Mr. Simpson isn't around. I mean, they can't get any mail to him. MS. DUSEK: I realize that. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Can't get any phone calls to him. I think changing 45 to 60 days is really immaterial because I don't think he's ever going to show up. MS. DUSEK: Well, I -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: If he does, he can always come and ask for an extension of time. I think just leave it like it is, and let's go with it. And if he does show up, that's to Mr. Redmond's plus, November 29, 2061 L6J 2 because then he can get his deed, although I don't know how this paperwork's going to get delivered because obviously nothing is getting to this man. And Mr. Redmond, I think, is -- it was told he was paying the taxes, so even the tax notices aren't getting to him, so I think at this point the days aren't going to help anybody, the number. I throw that out, food for thought. MS. DUSEK: Well, I -- I agree with you, in reality. I am just trying to -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Let's get the order out. And maybe with the issuance of the order -- who knows -- maybe that will trigger something and help, and then everybody will get this straightened out and Mr. Redmond will get his property. So are you going to leave your order like it is? MS. DUSEK: I guess. You were pretty firm with that so -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Sorry about that. MS. DUSEK: No. That's fine. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion on the floor. MS. DUSEK: I think it was seconded also? MR. PONTE: Uh -huh. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Good. We have a motion that has been seconded. Let's not rehash it. Any further question? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you. Mr. Redmond, you know what we've done after all of this? MR. REDMOND: (Nodded head.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. We're giving you 45 days to clean up what -- what is being called litter. Okay? Page 81 November 29, 200 6J 2 MR. REDMOND: Can I ask you one question? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes, sir. MR. REDMOND: I have -- what specifies as agricultural? I have tomato plants on my property, stuff like that. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That's a question we can't answer. You need to work that out with the county. That's a question we have no knowledge of MR. REDMOND: He just said that -- well, you said two goats, a chicken or -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: You're going to have to work that out with the county because that's something this board can't help you with. MR. REDMOND: I cannot work nothing out with the county. They will not do nothing. MS. DUSEK: It's zoned -- they did determine that it's zoned agriculture. MR. REDMOND: They did give me a permit for a building at one time. Now how can this be? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That's something, again, this board can't really help you with. What I would recommend to you -- and she's always helped everybody that's asked her that -- if you'll, you know, talk to Miss Arnold, I think she can maybe get you the assistance you need. Okay? That's -- she's always been very gracious about doing that. So I think if you go to her and ask her for some help, she'll get you somebody to help you. MR. REDMOND: Okay. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay? Next case, BCC versus Anna Rosa Avalos. MS. CRUZ: Let the record show that the respondent is not present. And before I request that the packet be admitted into evidence, I'd like to make a correction on page 2 and 4. Under the Page 82 November 29, 20116J 2 description of the violation, it should be one mobile home illegally situated on an estate -zoned property without the proper permits. The travel -- travel trailers have been removed. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. I would entertain a motion to accept the county's exhibit. MS. DUSEK: So moved. MR. LEHMANN: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second to accept the county's exhibit. All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you. MS. CRUZ: This is the Board of County Commissioners versus Anna Rosa Avalos, Case No. IM 2001 -01; violation of Sections 2.7.6, paragraph 1; Section 2.1.15, Section 2.2.3, 2.2.3.2.1, and Section 2.2.3.2.2 of Ordinance No. 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code. Again, the description of the violation is one mobile home illegally situated on an estate -zoned property without the proper permits. This violation exists at 1003 South First Street, Immokalee, Florida. This property is more particularly described as Section 9, Township 47, Range 29, the north 340 feet of the east 435 feet of northeast quarter of the southeast quarter, less the right -of -way 2.74 feet -- acres. I'm sorry. The name of the respondent, the property owner, is Anna Rosa Avalos. Address of record is 1003 South First Street, Immokalee, Florida. The violation was first observed on May 24th, 2001. Several notice of violations were provided to the respondent dated 5/24/01 with a correction date of June 7, '01; another dated August Page 83 November 29, 20 16J 2 24th of '01, with a correction date of 9/7/01; another one dated September 10th, '01, with a correction date of 9 /20 /01; and the last one dated November 5th, 2001, with a correction date of November 9th, 2001. As of yesterday the violation remains. I'd like to turn the case over to Investigator Milford Bayliss. (The oath was administered.) MR. BAYLISS: My name is Milford Bayliss. I'm the housing code investigator in Immokalee. This case progressed. When we first got there, it had two small mobile homes, these two in the rear of the house, a double -wide mobile home on the side. All of those were hooked up to the utilities, and the lady who lived in the house, it was her families that lived there. Her husband had passed away. She asked that her family remained near her, so she moved them into the trailers. We found a notice of violation with her and brought it to her attention that this was illegal because it was an estate area. She speaks very well, Spanish. She speaks English fairly well but may not understand everything we're trying to say to her. So I had an interpreter at every case. When we brought to her attention that all the utilities had to be disconnected, she did that. She moved her family into the house. When I brought to her attention that she had to have license plates affixed to the trailers in the rear that are small and considered travel trailers, she did that. When I asked her that she had to remove the mobile home, double -wide, she asked could she present this to the county board. I told her it would cost her the sum of bringing it there and that they would decide on -- what had to be done at that time. I had an interpreter with me, and I also used her son -in -law who spoke to her in Spanish and explained it. After hearing my story to her, this is what was going to happen, we were going to the board, she would have to pay the cost, the expenses, and then they would Page 84 November 29, 20116 J 2 decide whether the mobile home would remain or not remain. But it is illegal, as we see it, by the county and by the Land Development Code. She understood. And so that's where we are this morning. MS. DUSEK: So our only issue is the double -wide trailer. MR. BAYLISS: Correct. MS. SAUNDERS: Did she indicate that she was going to bring it to the board? MR. BAYLISS: I didn't hear you. MS. SAUNDERS: Did she indicate that she was going to pursue bringing -- getting permission -- MR. BAYLISS: She wanted to bring it to this board, this body. That's what she kept saying, "I want to bring it to the body." in -- in a social world that she probably grew up in, the body was judges. MS. SAUNDERS: Uh -huh. MR. BAYLISS: That's what she wanted, to let the judges decide. MR. PONTE: And what happened to her plans to move the trailer to another piece of property? MR. BAYLISS: She did not get the other piece of property. She had it surveyed, and it wasn't -- it could not be a mobile home put on it. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Currently where she is, am I correct in understanding that a mobile home is not permitted -- MR. BAYLISS: That's correct. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: --period? MR. BAYLISS: It's estate zoned, not allowed for a mobile home on an extended time. It's been there a great deal. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I just want to be clear -- MR. BAYLISS: That's okay. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- because the only option this board has is tell her to come into compliance, which is going to be remove Page 85 November 29, 2001 the mobile home. 16J 2 Any further questions for the investigator? MS. SAUNDERS: Is someone living in the double -wide mobile home right now? MR. BAYLISS: No, ma'am. When we issued her a notice of violation that no one could live in there, she moved the family in the house. And when I went to serve another notice of violation, they were all in the house. MS. SAUNDERS: She's really trying. MR. BAYLISS: Yes. She -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: She is trying. MR. BAYLISS: She's done everything I asked her to do. She just asked that the judges -- she said it in Spanish -- the judges decide whether she can put this family back in this mobile home and get her out -- get them out of her house, as much as she loves them. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Unfortunately, that's not a decision this board can make, so we can only tell her that she's going to have to remove it. She needs to go to a higher judge than us. MS. SAUNDERS: What is the process for getting an exemption or an exception on something like this? There is none? MS. ARNOLD: This particular use is not permitted. And when there's a prohibition in a zoning district, you can't get a variance or an exception. MR. LEHMANN: I can understand how sections -- I can understand how all the sections apply except possibly 2.2.3 of the ordinance. Could you explain how we're pulling that into play for the mobile home? MS. ARNOLD: That's just the purpose and intent of the estate zoning district, I believe. MR. LEHMANN: So is there a violation of that section? MS. ARNOLD: No. November 29, 2f l MR. LEHMANN: Oh. - bJ 2 MS. ARNOLD: It's just describing what the intent of that zoning district is. MR. LEHMANN: Okay. MS. DUSEK: So did you say we're eliminating that? MS. ARNOLD: Yeah. It's just added there because -- MR. LEHMANN: So the only -- the only sections that we have that really apply to this case is 2.7.6.1 and 2.1.15; is that correct? MS. ARNOLD: There's 2.2.3.2.1. MR. LEHMANN: Yes. But that's all part of Section 2.2.3 which you said is -- MS. ARNOLD: Well, the violation would be the -- let me see what those sections read. MR. LEHMANN: That's why I asked the question. MS. ARNOLD: I thought you meant just that one paragraph, the heading. But -- it's pointing out that in the estates zoning district under 2.2.3.2.1, the permitted uses are single - family and family -care facilities. And the use that we -- that -- or the structure that they have don't meet either one of these permitted uses. MR. LEHMANN: So the mobile home is not considered a single - family dwelling? MR. BAYLISS: Is not in estate. MS. ARNOLD: Mobile homes are listed separately as permanent -- or what -- if it were a permitted use, it would be listed separately, similar to the agricultural zoning district that we talked about previously. It had a mobile home overlay, so it then allowed mobile home structures in addition to single - family structures. MR. LEHMANN: I'm a little confused. So what you're saying to me is this is in the estates. MS. ARNOLD: Yes. MR. LEHMANN: This section would apply, and it's Page 87 November 29, 2T T6 J 2 permissible in the estates and on this property to have a single - family dwelling, but the mobile home is not considered a single - family dwelling. MR. BAYLISS: Correct. MS. SAUNDERS: Is there any way to turn a mobile home into a single - family -- MR. BAYLISS: It would have to be a module home, and it can't be on wheels. You can't have a structure built for DOT -- MS. SAUNDERS: If it was put on a type of concrete slab -- MR. BAYLISS: No. MS. SAUNDERS: I'm just looking -- MR. BAYLISS: Once a trailer has been designed and approved by DOT, it's a mobile home. No matter what you do to it, it's still a mobile home. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: It's different than a, quote, house, whether it's wood or concrete block. It's built totally differently. MS. SAUNDERS: Do you think it would help her, if she could find another piece of land, she would be happy to move this to there? MR. BAYLISS: Her wish is to have her family surround her like a hen with her little chicks. She wants everybody next to her. She's getting older, and her husband passed away. If she could find a piece of property close by probably, if we can approve -- if it could be approved by the county, put a mobile home on, it probably would work. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That's beyond us. MR. LEHMANN: Can I go back again? So the next section that we refer to also, 2.2, is that still applicable or not? MS. ARNOLD: Yeah. That is explaining the accessory uses that are permitted. And, again, if she wanted to build a guest house, for example -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Right. She could do that. November 29, 16J 2 6 MS. ARNOLD: -- she could do that. And that's one of the uses that are permitted under the accessory use section of this code. But, again, mobile homes are not listed in that section. MR. LEHMANN: Okay. So you're using the mobile home as an illustration of how we're violating that section. MS. ARNOLD: Yes. MR. LEHMANN: Thank you. MS. DUSEK: And in that same section, that 2.2.3.2.2, the -- are we using all of the parts, 1, 2, 3, 4? MS. ARNOLD: Those are just the list of all the permitted uses under that access use -- MS. DUSEK: So we don't have to separate one out? MS. ARNOLD: No. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: No. Any additional questions for the investigator? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you, sir. MR. BAYLISS: Thank you. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Finding of fact by the board? It's obvious a violation does exist because mobile homes aren't permitted. MS. DUSEK: I make a motion that in the case of the Board of County Commissioners Collier County versus Anna Rosa Avalos, CEB Case No. IM 2001 -01, that a violation does exist. The violation is of Sections 2.7.6.1, 2.1.15, 2.2.3.2.1, and 2.2.3.2.2 of Ordinance No. 91 -102, the Collier County Land Development Code. The description of the violation is one mobile home illegally situated on an estate -zoned property without the proper permit. MR. PONTE: You can't say without the proper permit because you can't get a permit. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: No. There's no permit to keep it on November 29, 2001 that piece of property. 16J 2 MS. DUSEK: All right. Then we'll eliminate that. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. We have a motion that there, in fact, does exist a violation. Do I hear a second? MR. LEHMANN: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second. Are there any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you. Order of the board. Unfortunately in this case there is only one solution, and it's to remove the trailer. Permits cannot be obtained or anything like that, so our only order can be for her to remove it. MS. SAUNDERS: But we do have some flexibility in the time limit we give her to move it. And since it doesn't seem to me that it's hurting anything and I really empathize with the lady, I would like to propose that we ask her to remove the double -wide mobile home within one year. That's stretching it. Just trying. MS. DUSEK: That's too much. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I'm afraid she's been apprised of this since May, so she's already had quite a few months to -- MS. SAUNDERS: Done everything we asked. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- yeah, to try to come into compliance. Unfortunately, the only thing is to remove it. She has tried to buy one piece of property. She either has to try to buy another one, or she's going to have to sell it or remove it. I don't think an exorbitant amount of time is going to resolve it. I'm not saying remove it tomorrow, but based that she's been under notice November 29, 20Q 1 T6J 2 since May 24th, you know, what, she had, one, two, three, four, five, six, seven months already, I think it's reasonable to give her another 30 days and -- MS. SAUNDERS: Oh. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- well, we've got Christmas. Let's give her until after the first of the year. There's going to be a lot of holidays. Maybe 60 days -- MS. DUSEK: Sixty days. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- to do something would be reasonable at this point. MS. DUSEK: I notice that the staff didn't recommend any fine. MS. ARNOLD: No. MS. DUSEK: I didn't know whether that was intentional or just an oversight. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Whether they would recommend, I think, is immaterial. I think the board can -- MS. DUSEK: Well, I know we can -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- empathize and come up with something that would be reasonable since the lady has been trying to work with the county in all cases. I don't think she should be, you know, drastically punished for trying to comply. She obviously, every time the investigator has been there, has tried to do what he's asked, so I think that gives us the idea that we should be as tolerant as possible. MS. DUSEK: I make a motion that we order the respondent to pay all operational costs incurred in the prosecution of the case, to remove the double -wide mobile home within 60 days, or a fine of $25 per day for each day the violation exists. MR. PONTE: I think you could reduce the fine. There's nothing magical about $25 unless it's coming out of your basis on a per diem basis. It's a lot. I would say $10 a day. Page 91 November 29, 20016J 6 2 MR. LEHMANN: I would rather see the time period extended rather than reduce the fine. It gives them plenty of time to take care of it; you don't have to worry about the fine. MR. PONTE: You do if the problem is not solved. I'd go for 90 days myself, but I think 25 is high. MS. DUSEK: I think since she has been very cooperative, I don't think the fine is going to matter. But I do think that we need to have a little more than that. I feel like $25 is not too much. I don't think she's going to pay. I think she'll have it removed. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Right now we have 60 days and $25. Any further discussion, and/or do I hear a second to that? MS. DUSEK: I don't mind adjusting that to 90, if that's preferable to most people. MR. PHILLIPS: Second 90. MS. DUSEK: Okay. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have 90 days and still $25. MS. DUSEK: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Darrin, are you all right with the $25? MR. PHILLIPS: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second. 90 days and $25 plus costs. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Opposed? MS. SAUNDERS: Opposed. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: One opposed. Motion carries. That closes the public hearing section. New business, imposition of fines, administrative action. MS. CRUZ: The first deposition of -- request for imposition of fines is Board of County Commissioners versus James -- Jason James Page 92 November 29, 2001 6 i J 2 Billington and Mary -- Marie Davey Starr, Case No. 2001 -063. This case came before the board on July 16, 2001. The board issued a findings of fact, conclusion of law, and order of the board finding the respondent in violation and ordering the respondent to correct the violations by coming into compliance with -- within 90 days -- that would have been October 14 -- or in the event that the compliance is not obtained, a fine of $25 per day be imposed for every day the violation continues. The violation was conversion of a single -car garage into a living area without first obtaining the permits. Staff requests that an imposition of fines be filed in the amount of $575 for the period of October 15, 2001, through November 7th, 2001, at a rate of $25 per day. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I would entertain a motion to impose the fines as requested. MR. LEHMANN: So moved. MS. SAUNDERS: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second to impose the fines. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Next. MS. CRUZ: Next one is the Board of County Commissioners versus Penelope Maroules, Case No. 2001 -074. This case came before the board on October 25th for violating -- violation of birds squawking at 63.2 decibels over the county ordinance requirements. The board ordered the respondent to abate the violation by 6 p.m. On October 25th, 2001. Page 93 November 29, 2011 6 J 2 The respondent did obtain -- further, the board ordered, the respondent paid all operational costs incurred in the prosecution of the case. The respondent did obtain compliance, as ordered by the board. However, staff requested the board issue an imposition of fine in the amount of $421 with 80 cents for the operational costs. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I will entertain a motion to impose the fines for the operational costs. MR. PCUNTE: So moved. MR. LEHMANN: Second CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? aye. (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All those in favor signify by saying (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Next. MS. CRUZ: Next one is Board of County Commissioners versus McAlpine Briarwood, Inc., and Charles Hitchcock, Case No. 20010 -75 -- dash 075. The violation was brought before the board. It was failure to install the ball netting for the driving range along the westerly edge of the parcel and install landscaping and irrigation along Livingston Road according to the SDP No. 99 -058 (sic). This case was heard -- heard by the board on August 23rd of 2001. The board issued an order ordering the respondent to install the required safety netting along the Livingston Road part of the property as required by the SDP by August 30th, 2001; further, to install the landscaping and irrigation along the Livingston Road as required by the SDP by September 7th, 2001, to pay all operational Page 94 November 29, 2001 t 6 �,J 2 costs incurred in the prosecution of this case in that the -- if the respondent did not comply with said order, to -- by installing the netting, a $75 per day be imposed Staff requests that the board issue an imposition of fine in the amount of $2,650 for the period of September 8th through October 31 st, 2001, at a rate of $50 per day, plus 636 with 20 cents for the operational costs incurred in the prosecution of the case. MR. PONTE: I have a -- a problem here. Is there a typo or a conflict or something I'm not understanding? In one instance we're talking about $75 a day, and then we talk about 50. The affidavit of compliance says $75 a day, and the actual order says $50. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: The order of the board is 50. MS. ARNOLD: It should be 50. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: $50 is the number. So do you need to recalculate or -- MS. ARNOLD: Which one are we on? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Is what you're recommending correct? MS. CRUZ: What we're recommending is correct, the 2650. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That's based on $50. MS. CRUZ: Based on $50. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. I would entertain a motion to impose the fines as requested. MR. LEHMANN: So moved. MS. DUSEK: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? aye. (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All those in favor signify by saying (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? Page 95 November 29, 2001 (No response.) 16J 2 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Next one. MS. CRUZ: Next one is the Board of County Commissioners versus Andrew and Letty Espinoza, Case No. 2001 -079. This violation was brought before the board for a large commercial dumpster placed upon residential property and the parking /storage of vehicle without license plates. On October 25th this case was heard by the board. The board issued an -- an order request -- ordering the respondent to abate all violations within ten days, which would have been November 5th; pay operational costs in the prosecution of the case, or a fine of $25 per day for every day the violation continues. The respondent did obtain compliance as ordered. However, we're requesting that a fine, an imposition of fine, be imposed for the total of $380 with 52 cents, and this will be for the operational cost involved in the case. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I'd entertain a motion to impose the operational costs, fines, as requested by the county. MR. LEHMANN: So moved. MS. SAUNDERS: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That closes the imposition of fines. We have a request for a dismissal and/or reduction of a fine. MR. LEHMANN: Do you want to -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Oh, did I miss one? That's next on the agenda. MS. ARNOLD: Right. Page 96 November 29, 201 6 2 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: No. We're still under new business. MR. LEHMANN: I'm way ahead then. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: So -- we have Albertina Cardona and Terry Arce or Arcey (phonetic). I hope I pronounced that correctly. That's the first one. MS. CRUZ: Yes. This is a request -- request made by Mr. Arce. He is present. If I may remind you what this case was about -- it came before the board on April 26 -- the violation was removal of slightly under 1 acre of protective vegetation without the authorization of a Collier County permit. There was an order imposing fines on this case, and there's still -- the fines are pending for $350 plus $430 with 10 cents for the operational costs. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Are the fines still running, or has he complied? MS. CRUZ: No, sir. He has complied. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: He was complied. So the amount of the fines that are in contention are how much? MS. CRUZ: $350. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Three fifty, plus the -- MS. CRUZ: Plus 430 and 10 cents for the operational costs. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Mr. Arce, are you here, sir? MR. ARCE: Yes. I was just requesting a waiver of the fine but not of the operational costs. I'd like to pay that, but I just didn't have the -- it took me longer to comply than what the board had given me. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: How much longer? Give us a hint, since we don't have the paperwork in front of us. MR. ARCE: It was maybe three weeks longer. Yeah. It might have been three weeks. I don't remember. MS. GODFREY: Wasn't this the case where you cleared to put orange trees in? MR. ARCE: Right. Yes. I complied. I -- I took the after -the- Page 97 November 29, 200 16J 2 fact permit which cost $600. I put all the 20 plants in, which cost over a grand and some shrubs, 10 shrubs that I was told to put back. I put that back in too. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. GODFREY: If I recall you gave the investigator quite a hard time. I recall your case quite well. MR. ARCE: She wanted me to put all the trees back. MS. GODFREY: No. She wanted the arbitration is what she wanted, the -- you would not meet with her. You were stalling regarding putting -- MR. ARCE: We couldn't get together. MS. GODFREY: -- certain trees and stuff and putting irrigation, I couldn't do this, I couldn't do that. MR. ARCE: She wanted me to put -- MS. GODFREY: You said, well, if you could put orange trees in, why couldn't you put the trees that she wanted in. MR. ARCE: Right. I put all that back. I went ahead and did that. We wouldn't -- we couldn't get together as far as the amount of trees, and we couldn't get together to talk about the plan of the plot, where the trees -- MS. GODFREY: If I can recall -- excuse me. But if I can recall, that was all settled. MR. ARCE: Yeah. MS. GODFREY: We were just waiting -- the plan had already been approved. They were waiting for you, and you two just had to get together. MR. ARCE: Right. MS. GODFREY: So why did it take three weeks? MR. ARCE: I needed to find the landscapers. I needed to get some bids to get 20 plants or 20 trees put back. MS. GODFREY: If I understood, that was already taken care Page 98 November 29, 2001 of. She was dust waiting for you to 16J __ 2 MR. ARCE: Yeah. Well, I agreed to do that. I needed to get the landscape company to put the trees back. I needed to get some bids. I needed someone to give me some prices on putting them back and buying these trees. I don't do that. I don't know how to do that. I needed to get some bids, and it took a little bit longer. It took -- I don't know. I got probably four bids, and I needed to get -- you know. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yeah. I understand. You and the county had worked out what was to be done. MR. ARCE: Right. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: What you didn't have was bids on actually getting it done. MR. ARCE: Right. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That's fine. Miss Arnold, can you tell us, the 350 is over -- is that 3 weeks or 18 days, whatever, however? What was the amount of money, since I don't remember? MS. ARNOLD: We actually have additional fines because September 27th was the date of compliance. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That was the date he complied? And when was he supposed to comply by? MS. ARNOLD: He should have complied by July 26. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. And the fines were to be how much? MS. ARNOLD: Okay. I'm calculating that now. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: No. Just tell me what the order said, how much a day. MS. ARNOLD: Oh, $25 per day. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you. Sixty -two days? Yeah. $1550? MS. ARNOLD: Yeah. An additional eleven -- eleven seventy- Page 99 November 29, 2001 16J five, plus three fifty; fifteen twenty -five total plus the operational costs. MR. LEHMANN: Miss Arnold, what was the original time period in the order? MS. ARNOLD: 725. MR. LEHMANN: How much time was permitted? MS. ARNOLD: He was given -- MS. CRUZ: Ninety days. MS. ARNOLD: Ninety days to comply. MR. LEHMANN: The order of the board gave him 90 days to comply. And he's looking for -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: And he took an extra 62 beyond the 90? MS. ARNOLD: (Nodded head.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. DUSEK: Could you repeat to me what the fines are, the total? I mean, you -- the operational costs and the fines. MS. ARNOLD: The operational costs were four hundred and -- MS. CRUZ: Thirty. MS. ARNOLD: $430 for the operational costs. Then for the period between July 26 to August 9th, which you did imposition of fines, it was $350. Then from August 10th through September 26, which is the -- we assume it was done the day before, it's $1175 for a total of 1525. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. So the fine is 1525 plus 430. And Mr. Arce is asking us to waive the 1525. MR. ARCE: Yes, that's right. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Just so we -- I want to know the numbers that you're asking us to consider, just so we're all on the same page. And the time -- the reason the fines were so high is it took an Page 100 November 29, 200 extra 62 days. 16J 2 MS. GODFREY: We asked him -- we asked him the time he would need, and he told us, if I can recall correctly. MR. LEHMANN: Refresh my memory again. Roughly how many specimen trees needed to be planted, and what was -- what was the scope of the job? MS. ARNOLD: Let's see if I can tell. I don't have what -- the exact mitigation plan. But there are notes in the case that indicate on August -- August 17th the investigator observed 20 mitigation trees, 9 cypress, 10 dahoon holly, and 1 oak and 1 unknown species. No shrubs were planted. And she left her card at the door requesting a call. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Do you have access to the actual order, Michelle? MS. CRUZ: We have -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Read me what the order told him to do, please. MS. CRUZ: Okay. The respondent corrected violations of Section 3.9.3 of Ordinance No. 91 -102 by obtaining any applicable after - the -fact permit and submit an approved mitigation plan within 7 days and complete planting for approved mitigation plan within 90 days, parentheses, July 25th. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Complete planting, is that what it says? MS. CRUZ: Planting, uh -huh. Further, it goes on respondent pay all operational costs in the prosecution of this case until they come into compliance, and No. 3, that if the respondent does not comply with paragraph 1 of the order of the board by July 25th, 2001, that in that event, there would be a fine of $25 per day for each day. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. The first one where it was complete, was that submittal of the mitigation plan by the 7th or Page 101 November 29, 2001 something, did that occur? 16J 2 MS. ARNOLD: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: He met the first part. What he didn't do was plant everything, which was X days from approval of the plan; right? MS. ARNOLD: Right. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MS. DUSEK: He had most things planted; is that correct? It was mainly the shrubs that were -- MS. ARNOLD: I don't know what the mitigation plan was for. In this particular case on the 17th -- and he can probably tell you exactly what Alex approved, but on this particular date she noted what she observed, but it wasn't complete because there was a notation that there were no shrubs planted, and I'm assuming that -- MR. ARCE: That's correct. It was for 20 native trees and -- and 10 shrubs. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Do this for me, please. The order was dated what day? MS. CRUZ: It was signed May 4th, 2001. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. 5/4. And he was to have the mitigation plan by, which he did -- was that September or July? MS. ARNOLD: Seven days. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Oh, within seven days from May. MS. ARNOLD: Yes. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: So that went to May 11 th. And he met that. Then we gave him -- MS. ARNOLD: 90 days. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: -- 90 days from May 1 lth to do everything; correct? Okay. So I guess the question is, instead of 90 days, he needed 152 days. I guess I have a little problem with that personally but -- Page 102 November 29, 2001 J MS. GODFREY: I do too. There's a purpose of clearing the land. He and his wife were going to grow orange trees. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Whatever. We gave him enough time, so I -- I have a problem giving him an extra 62 days personally. MR. PONTE: We gave him enough time in order to let the plantings be done during the rainy season. We also were very lenient on the fine. It's the same fine we've leveled earlier today where everybody was very sympathetic. I think we've shown our willingness to work with the respondent in this case when we gave him the 90 days and a very lenient fine of $25. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: So do I hear a motion? MR. LEHMANN: I would move that we deny Mr. Arce request for waiver of the fines. MR. PONTE: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second to deny the request. Any further discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All in favor signify by saying aye. (Mr. Lehmann, Mr. Ponte, Ms. Saunders, Ms. Dusek, and Ms. Godfrey all responded.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any opposed? MR. PHILLIPS: Nill. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: One. 6 -1. Sorry, Mr. Arce. MR. ARCS: Okay. I tried. What's the time period? CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: You work that out with the county. Next one is Mr. Bell, Rick Bell. MS. ARNOLD: Yes, sir. Mr. Bell is present, and he was requesting to come before the board. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Is this also a -- do we know what it's for? MS. CRUZ: I believe Mr. Bell is requesting for an extension? Page 103 November 29, 2001 1 _ 6 J 2 MR. BELL: Yes, ma'am. That's correct. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. What -- first, before he asks us, tell us what the order says so we know. MS. CRUZ: This case came before the board on September 27th, 2001. The board found him in violation of enclosure of a structure of a lower level of a stilt home without first obtaining the necessary permits. The board ordered the respondent to comply by obtaining all the necessary permits, if obtainable, or returning the structure to its previously permitted condition within 60 days, which would have been November 27th. And it further goes on to pay the operational costs and $25 per day. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. All right. Mr. Bell, just so we know what we're doing. MR. BELL: Yeah. I've been working on this steady ever since then, and I'm still now waiting on the county to get back to me because I've submitted more for -- and they've come up -- there's a question when the house was built, it was built on the improper setbacks on the seawall. So the county hasn't given me a clear answer on that yet, and they won't issue me a permit until they clarify the problem. I met with Miss Arnold, and I'm still waiting on an answer back. I can't get a permit yet. I'm still waiting on the county. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: So your holdup is not your fault. It's the county at this point. MR. BELL: Also, I've applied for getting the original documents when the house was built, and there's a mix -up with the county with their warehouse, and they're unable to produce them at this time. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. MR. BELL: So they don't know when they're going to be able to produce them. Page 104 November 29, 20016J 2 CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: What - what I would suggest, I guess, the board has, really, two options. We can amend our order to give you more time, or you can -- we understand you've been here. It's on file. Just proceed with what you're doing. When the county comes to us to impose a fine on you, you come back and say, you know, I still haven't got my permit, it's not my fault, or I got my permit X, and I'd like you either to reduce the fine or waive the fine. Okay. That's the two choices. I would be probably against amending the order at this time. Let's just wait and see if the county doesn't move along a little faster and solve its problem and then you can come back. How's that? MR. BELL: Yeah, that's fine. I just wanted to make sure I didn't wait until later and then you -all said, "Well, you should have came back, and you should have asked for it in the beginning." CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We understand, and that's terrific. MR. BELL: As long as I'm covered, that's fine. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: All right, sir. MR. BELL: All right. Thank you. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: That finishes new business. We don't have any old business. Affidavits of compliance. MS. CRUZ: This is just a matter of reporting to the board that these two cases came before you, and they have been -- they are in compliance at this time. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Great. Reports are done. Under comments we have, for some reason, a request for discussion. I don't -- what? MS. ARNOLD: The citizen that requested to be placed on the agenda is not present. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. Dead item. MS. SAUNDERS: We tried. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Anything from the board? Page 105 November 29, 2001 16J MS. SAUNDERS: Just that I will not be here, Mr. Chairman, on December 17. I'm very sorry about that. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: I understand. Anything from the county's side? MS. ARNOLD: No. I also received word from Diane Taylor that she won't be -- CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: She won't be here for the 17th? MS. ARNOLD: Right. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Any other problems for the 17th from anyone? MR. PONTE: I have a possible problem the 17th. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Okay. That still leaves one, two, three, four, five, five out of seven is still a quorum. And we don't know about Miss Curatolo. She might be able to be here. I don't know. That gives us six. Miss Rawson, you okay? MS. RAWSON: I'll be here. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: The next meeting is the 17th. If there's nothing further, I would entertain a motion to adjourn. MS. DUSEK: So moved. MS. SAUNDERS: Second. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: We have a motion and a second. All in favor signify by saying aye. (Unanimous response.) CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Thank you very much. MS. ARNOLD: I would request that everybody keep your packet, the very thick packet, for Manatee. CHAIRMAN FLEGAL: Yes. Rather than ask the county to reprint all that stuff. MR. PONTE: Good suggestion. Page 106 z November 29, 2001 16J 2 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 12:25 p.m. CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD CLIFFORD FLWAI,` CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF DONOVAN COURT REPORTING, INC., BY BARBARA A. DONOVAN, RMR, CRR Page 107 16K 1 MEMORANDUM Date: February 27, 2002 To: Jennifer Edwards, Supervisor of Elections From: Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Re: Agreement For Election Services By And Among The City Of Naples, Collier County And The Supervisor Of Elections Enclosed please find one (1) original document, as referenced above, approved by the Board of County Commissioners on February 26, 2002 (Agenda Item #16K1). Kindly forward the agreement to the City of Naples for the required signatures and return the fully executed original to Minutes and Records. If you should have any questions, please contact me at 774- 8406. Thank you. Enclosure 16K AGREEMENT FOR ELECTION SERVICES By and Among the City of Naples, Collier County and the Supervisor of Elections This Agreement for Election Services (Agreement) is for the February 5. 2002 city council election and is by and among the City of Naples (City), Collier County by and through the Collier County Board of County Commissioners as owners of the County's voting and ballot tabulation equipment, and the Collier County Supervisor of Elections (Supervisor) as custodian of the County's voting and ballot tabulation equipment. WITNESSETH In consideration of the premises and covenants set out below, and for $10 and other valuable considerations in hand received by the County and the City, it is hereby acknowledged and agreed by the parties hereto as follows: 1. The City acknowledges that only the Florida Constitution and the Florida Legislature may confer jurisdiction on the Board of County Commissioners and the Supervisor of Elections through various legislative enactments. Jurisdiction cannot be conferred by agreement, consent, waiver, or other voluntary act or involuntary act since jurisdiction is established solely by general law. 2. Section 97.021(7), Florida Statutes, provides the definition for "election" used throughout the election code and by definition, those elections for which the County and Supervisor are responsible. The City acknowledges that such definition does not include municipal elections. 3. Under the terms of the City Charter, the City is responsible for the conduct of all its municipal elections except when the City chooses to call a special election to be held by mail ballot. Such an election is subject to a separate Agreement for Services. 4. The home rule powers granted to cities by the Florida Constitution provide for the conduct of the February 5, 2002 City council election under the City Charter. 5. To facilitate the City's conduct of its February 5, 2002 election, the Supervisor of Elections shall do those items enumerated in Exhibit A identified as §19.1, Security Procedures for Stand Alone Municipal Elections of Collier County, 6. The City shall provide to the Supervisor of Elections and the Florida Attorney General a copy of the City's letter of submission and response to and from the U.S. Department of Justice relative to any changes which the City makes relative to polling site locations or any applicable charter amendment referendum questions. Such copy shall be provided no later than 5:00 p.m. on the fourth day preceding the election. 7. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, the County agrees to lease the following items to the City for use at the polls in its election: •120 Voting booths, ELS or equivalent self- contained Model 5 aluminum • 120 228 position vote recorders and templates 0120 Magnifying lens attached to the stylus chain •120 Voting Stylus — one per booth\ extras to be provided • 20 Handicapped stylus -- one per precinct • 20 Demonstration vote recorders • 20 Ballot Boxes and ballot box tables • 20 Ballot Box padlocks and keys • 20 Long -stub Ballot Transfer Cases, aluminum 1 16K 1 • 20 Precinct Signs with mounting assembly • Precinct directional street signs and mounting assembly additional signs for 660 and 661 • 20 Precinct file caddy and supplies • 20 American Flags • 20 Flag Poles • 20 Vote Here Alphabet Card sets • 20 Alphabet card holders and assembly • Disabled Access Ramps only if precincts used match that for which the County had constructed a ramp Laptop computer for each precinct 8. The City shall contract for and acquire all consumable supplies used in the election directly from the Vendor. The City shall contract for and acquire ballot cards which conform to the standards provided by administrative rules adopted by the state. Consumable supplies are those which may be used once. 9. The City shall arrange for the voting equipment preparation to occur between the hours of 8:30 a.m. and 4:30 p.m. on Thursday and/or Friday preceding the election date. 10. The City shall arrange to have the voting equipment supplies picked up from the Elections Warehouse at 8:15 a.m. on the Monday preceding election day. 11. No later than the third day following the election, the City shall check or clean out the equipment to insure that no City election supplies remain in the file caddy, the ballot boxes, transfer cases, or voting units — either used or unused. 12. The City shall remove the masks and ballot pages from the voting machines and identify them for their records retention. 13. No later than 5:00 p.m. of the Friday immediately following the election, the City shall remove its supplies — both used and unused — and transfer them to the City's own storage facility. 14. The City shall use the County's certified tabulating systems, as certified for use after July 1, 1993 under the new state standards, and pay directly to the Supervisor of Elections all costs for programming, on -site election support, and any repairs required as a result of the City's use. 15. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to require the County or the Supervisor to provide the setup of equipment for use by the City. 16. This Agreement shall be construed to require the County or the Supervisor to provide all oaths, forms, and training materials to the City's Pollworkers, Clerks and Oath Persons. 17. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to infer that the County or the Supervisor interpreted the provisions of the City's charter or interfered in any way with the City's exercise of its home rule powers pursuant to the conduct of the City election. 18. Nothing in this Agreement shall require the County or the Supervisor to arrange for the acquisition or construction of additional equipment for use by the City at its poll sites should such equipment not already be in the County's inventory for that specific poll site facility. 19. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to require the County or the Supervisor to arrange for the installation and delivery and pickup of voting machines or equipment to the City or to the poll sites for use on election day. 2 16K 1 20. Nothing in this Agreement shall be construed to require the County or the Supervisor to arrange for or acquire any supplies for use by the City for either the voting equipment or at the polls. 21. Neither the County nor the Supervisor shall be held accountable for equipment needs not contained within this Agreement. There shall be no last minute adjustments to this Agreement for equipment or consumable supplies. 22. Subject to the terms of this Agreement, the County agrees to lease to the City the ballot tabulation equipment components enumerated herein: • A Novell 3.2 file server with monitor and keyboard • A HP Laser Jet 5 printer; • A "host" Pentium 3 with monitor, keyboard • Three F & C M1000N card readers; • All existing cabling and power cords; • Current county configured and attached Best UPS Systems; Three remote Pentium 3 work stations with monitors and keyboards. 23. The County agrees to lease the foregoing ballot tabulation equipment to the City subject to the following additional conditions: •The City shall utilize the services of the staff of the Supervisor of Elections to program the system for ballot tabulation of the city election; •The City shall not remove the ballot tabulation equipment from the Collier County Government Center where it is in the Supervisor's custody or take any action which would jeopardize the security of the system or interrupt the custody chain. •The City shall conduct its Logic & Accuracy Test at 9:00 a.m. on Tuesday, one week prior to the election. •The City shall arrange for the Supervisor of Elections staff to load the election -- specific ballot tabulation software onto the County's equipment between the hours of 8 a.m. and 9 a.m. no later than Tuesday, one week before the election. *The City shall arrange for storage of its copy of the ballot tabulation program at a site other than the Collier County Government Center. -The City's failure to comply with any of these provisions as determined by the Supervisor of Elections shall invalidate this Agreement except for paragraphs 33 and 34 since such action would have implications for subsequent County elections. 24. The Supervisor's office shall be and is solely responsible for the content and format of any affidavits and training materials used in the course of its election. 25. The Supervisor shall be responsible for any training of City's election workers, and the development of its training materials. The City shall be liable for all actions taken by the City's poll workers during the course of its election day. 26. The City shall be responsible for all activity relating to any absentee ballots it chooses to provide voters for its election — including processing requests; addressing absentee envelopes; verification of voter signatures; and providing lists of absentee voters to city candidates subject to the oath requirements of §98.095, Florida Statutes, being filed with and authorized by the Supervisor of Elections. 27. With the sole exception of the voter registration book closing advertisement, the City shall run proper bilingual advertisements for required election notices in a newspaper of general circulation within the county. 3 16K 28. The City shall provide the necessary training and personnel on election day to verify absentee voter signatures, open absentee ballots and prepare the voted ballots for actual tabulation. Such work shall be conducted under the rules established by the City Canvassing Board. 29. Except for precinct registers, the City shall be responsible for retention of all election materials and for records destruction once 22 months have lapsed per the Voting Rights Act time frame. 30. With the exception of activities relating directly to the Supervisor's determinations regarding voter registration and eligibility and to the extent permitted by law, the City shall pay for the Supervisor's selection of defense counsel and indemnify and hold harmless the County, the Supervisor of Elections, their officers, agents, and employees, from and against any and all actions, in law or in equity, from liability or claims for damages, injuries, losses, and expenses including attorney's fees, to any person or property which may result now or in the future from City's activities associated with this City election, arising out of or resulting from any and all acts of omission or commission relating to the City's election or the City's responsibility under this Agreement. Further, to the extent permitted by law, the City shall pay for the Supervisor's selection of defense counsel and indemnify and hold harmless the County, the Supervisor of Elections, their officers, agents and employees, from and against any and all actions, in law or in equity, from liability or claims for damages, injuries, losses, and expenses, to any person or persons authorized by the City, its employees, or agents to participate in the City election when not otherwise eligible or from events relating expressly to City election activity. 31. All costs, including attorney's fees and court costs, shall be paid by the City for: a. litigation involving payment due to the County or Supervisor and for collection for any judgment recorded against the City, or b. litigation involving the City's election whether brought by an elector, the U.S. Department of Justice, or others. 32. The Supervisor or her staff shall prepare and advertise bilingually the voter registration book closing in accordance with general law and obtain an Affidavit of Publication for same. Said advertisement shall subsequently be billed to the City which shall be responsible for payment. 33. To lease voting units, ballot boxes, and other supplies listed within this contract, the fee shall be $50 per voting unit ($50 x 120 units = $6,000). The fee shall cover replacement parts and shipping necessary to repair any damages to the County's voting unit or equipment leased to the City. In the event the cost of such replacement parts exceeds the amount of the fee, the City shall reimburse the County for the difference. The fee shall be paid to the Supervisor no less than 45 days prior to election day. 34. Within 10 calendar days of the city election date, the City shall provide any replacement parts or equipment that were lost, stolen, or damaged while in the City's possession. 35. If the Supervisor's actual City election costs exceed the amount of the fee, the City shall pay the Supervisor's bill within ten calendar days of its receipt. Rates for the Supervisor's bill shall be actual costs associated with the following: • computer sort time at the rate of $75 per sort: • computer printing at the rate of $.15 per page • computer printing at the rate of $.27 per page • actual costs of advertising the voter registration book closing; • actual staff labor costs for work unique and peculiar to the City's election; • actual records retention storage costs at the rate of $.25 per cubic foot of 4 0, 16K 1 material kept 22 months; • actual costs of containers used to store election related materials @ $5.50 /box; • $.34 for postage on #10 envelopes, or current rate; •$2.32 for certified mail postage, or current rate; •$.0125 per page of county Precinct Register paper used (does not include data processing sorts or printing costs); •$.032 per page of letterhead stationery or current cost; •$.0328 per #10 letterhead envelope or current cost; •$.0348 per #10 window letterhead envelope or current cost; •$.11 per purchase order or current cost; •$.082 per voucher check or current cost; •$.15 per page for 8.5" x 11" or 8.5" x 14" copies; •$.20 per page for duplexed copies; •$1.00 per page for certified copies of available public records; •$15.00 labor costs for each page of letters or documents produced; *actual cost of any expenditures required by the City's election and paid by the Supervisor. 36. Notwithstanding all provisions for payment set forth in this Agreement, Section 101.002(2), Florida Statutes, provides that the City shall be responsible for all costs associated with manpower, equipment, postage, and any other City election costs as enumerated in Section 97.021(6), (9) Florida Statutes, whether or not specifically set forth in this Agreement. 37. Nothing in this Agreement relieves the City of its responsibility to develop security procedures for its election. The County and Supervisor of Elections responsibility for security regarding the City's election are limited to those items contained in the attached Exhibit A. 38. The County and the Supervisor of Elections has no liability for costs or expenses or other liability incurred by the City in preparation for this election should the U.S. Department of Justice note an objection in its response to the City Manager's request. Further, should there be a response noting an objection which would delay or prohibit the conduct of the election, the City is not relieved of any related financial obligation owed to the County and Supervisor arising from fees, goods and services, or other costs and expenses whether or not specifically set forth in this Agreement, incurred by the Supervisor up to the time the City notifies the Supervisor in writing of the Department of Justice objection. 39. The City shall obtain an insurance policy which shall name the County as additionally insured or agree to provide coverage through the City's self - insurance and shall assure that the County will have no financial obligation which includes the City's responsibility for paying any deductible for any damages to the County's voting and ballot tabulating equipment and systems used in a City election. The City shall provide the County with a Certificate of Insurance for said coverage or a resolution indicating such coverage under the City's self - insurance program. 40. In the event there is an election protest, contest, or sequestration order arising from the City's election involving any component of the County's voting system and /or equipment which would preclude its further use until the matter has been resolved by the courts and the County has an election scheduled where the equipment must be used, the City shall make a $25,000 security deposit to Collier County within four calendar days of the issuance of the sequestration order for the tabulation component and an additional $25,000 if voting units are involved. The unused balance on the security deposit shall be returned to the City when the legal matter has been resolved. 41. The City shall arrange for candidates, candidate supporters, and members of the press to congregate and await election results in some publicly accessible meeting area such as the County Commission meeting room, City Hall, or other comparable location. Candidates only may be given tours of parts of the secured areas of the Elections Office. The City Canvassing Board, 5 16K 1 its precinct election workers, its election night workers, and the Elections employee designated with custodial supervision of the facility for the day will be admitted to the secured area for processing. 42. This Agreement shall be valid only for the City election held February 5, 2002. 44. In the event any part of this Agreement is determined to be unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, said ruling shall not invalidate the remaining parts of the Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto authorize this Agreement, consisting of six consecutively numbered pages plus a one page "Exhibit A" attachment, and affix their hand and seal this day of 2002 by the Naples City Council and this cg.G,•day of , 2002 by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners and Supervisor of Elec ons. ATTEST: t Dwight Brack, Clerk ;, OP `fit *V, itt t0 d1i 1 rum _ sig�+rtr� M1�. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency for the County: - - - I P - . P-, - � Or- N A' Chief Assistant County Attorney ATTEST: Collier County Board of Commissioners Supervisor of Elections )/J nifer J Ed rds City of Naples Tara Norman, Naples City Clerk Bonnie MacKenzie, Mayor Approved as to form and legal sufficiency for the City: Naples City Attorney 0 16K 1 Exhibit A Collier County, Florida §19.1 SECURITY PROCEDURES for Stand Alone Municipal Elections (not scheduled concurrently with state /county dates or mail ballot elections) The Elections Office will advertise the registration book closing. 2. The Elections office will provide the City with a precinct by precinct demographics report within seven days of registration book closing. 3. On the 6th day preceding election day, the Elections Office will run the computer sort to produce precinct registers for use by the City (not required for mail ballot election). 4. On the 4th day preceding election day, the Elections Office shall deliver the precinct register(s) to the City Clerk no later than 5:30 p.m. (not required for mail ballot election). 5. If the City leases the County's voting equipment (not supplies), permission must be obtained from both the Board of County Commissioners and the Supervisor of Elections for each election date per F.S. 101.36. The City shall provide the County with an itemized list of requested equipment no less than 45 days prior to election day. The County shall not be required to provide equipment it does not have nor shall it be required to provide all equipment requested. 6. If authorized by the County, the City shall arrange to pick up the leased equipment, prepare it for use in its election, and deliver it to their polling place(s). 7. The City shall return leased County equipment to the Elections Office the day after the election. The equipment shall be in the same condition as when it was received by the city. 8. If the City issues absentee ballots, the Elections Office will, prior to the canvass of votes, provide the City with records access for their verification of voter signatures on absentee ballots brought to the Elections Office by the City. 9. No later than the 2nd day after the election, the City shall deliver to the Elections Office the precinct register(s) organized in ascending precinct order. No later than the 3rd day after the election, the City shall deliver to the Elections Office, the voter affidavits organized in alphabetical order for use to the Elections Office in updating elector records. 10. If the City leases the County's ballot tabulation system, only the Supervisor of Elections security procedures for building and system access shall apply. The City shall be responsible for all other security measures for its procedures and supplies. 11. The Elections Office shall retain the precinct register(s) for twenty -two (22) months and then shall seek Bureau of Archives authorization for destruction. Revised September 2001 raarynoomracn,�,,,;y VA 16L1 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 16L2 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 16L 3 AMENDMENT #4 TO LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT TO LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT made this 31" day of July 2001, between the Board of County Commissioners, (the "County "), and the law firm of Carlton, Fields, Ward, Emmanuel & Smith, P.A., of Tallahassee and Tampa, Florida, ( "Carlton, Fields ") Whereas, the County and Carlton, Fields have previously entered into a Continuing Retention Agreement dated June 22, 1999, an Amendment to Legal Services Agreement dated September 28, 1999, Amendment #2 to Legal Services Agreement dated April 11, 2000, and Amendment #3 to Legal Services Agreement dated July 31, 2001; and Whereas, the County has expressed a desire to obtain the services of outside counsel and, specifically, Carlton, Fields, to advise, assist and work with the Board of County Commissioners, the County Attorney and County staff regarding specialized litigation; and Whereas, by virtue of the diverse special expertise and resources of Carlton, Fields, said firm can provide the desired services and it is appropriate to amend the Legal Services Agreement to denominate an attorney of the firm to provide services at the reduced rate of $300.00 per hour. NOW THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: The Continuing Retention Agreement dated June 22, 1999, Amendment to Legal Services Agreement dated September 22, 1999, Amendment #2 to Legal Services Agreement dated April 11, 2000, Amendment #3to Legal Services Agreement dated July 31, 2000 by and between the County and Carlton, Fields are hereby amended to provide that the County, agrees to pay the following named attorney as compensation for legal services: Ruth Kinsolving at a rate of $300.00 per hour for all previously assigned, continuing and subsequently assigned work performed. Page 1 of 2 i 16L 3 Except as expressly amended hereabove, the terms and conditions of said Continuing Retention Agreement and amendments are unchanged. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Counsel and the Board, have each, respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. WITNESSES: ?�� (signature) 0, 1 a LAJ i- ci >✓ (Printed name of witness (signature) )qA-1d,ve- AMMJ Printed name of witness) Attest is to Chiirsan'S sie •nly. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By Apprgugdi to form and legal sufficiency: C'-4� Z�' ;�-� Michael W. Pettit Assistant County Attorney CARLTON, FIELDS, WARD, EMMANUEL & S H Michael F. Neuchterlein, Esq. Page 2 of 2 JAMES-'N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN 1Z/.z 410 All, 16L 4 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 1, 2002 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO THE BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 6, 2003 16L 7 DOCUMENT NOT RECEIVED IN CLERK TO BOARD OFFICE AS OF MAY 1, 2002 REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING Or" rutsLrt; r-L."cai.w F k to the Board: Please place the following as a: mal Legal Advertisement 0 Other: Adv., location, etc.) *,r * * * * *,r * * * * * * * * * * *,rw,► * * *•* r * *,r * * * * * * * * *ww * * *t * * ** * *•+1 *rr,r *rt * * * * * * * * * * * *,t * * * * * * * *w « * * *,t,e* Originating Dept/ Div: Comm.Dev.Serv./Planning Person::ate:. Petition No. (If none, give brief description): VA- 2001 -AR -1442 Petitioner: (Name & Address): Kirk N. Sanders, P.O. Box 2481, Naples, FL 34102 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: Hearing before 0 BCC XX BZA O Other Requested Hearing date:. 2/26/02 1 Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News 0 Other 0 Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: VA- 2001 -AR -1442, Kirk Sanders, requesting a 2.3 -foot after -the -fact variance from the required 10 -foot rear yard setback established for accessory structures to 7.7 feet for property located at 1139 Sperling Avenue, further described as Lot 14, Block B, Sperlings Subdivision, in Section 22, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? XX Yes Cl No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 113 - 138312- 649110 d y,: : , by: 02 ! Division Head Da e List Attachments: County Manager DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS Date A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: 0 County Manager agenda file: to 0 Requesting Division O Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE O Y: Date Received: 01 o -z, Date of Public hearing: o .a Date Advertised: O /a o -€ 17A RESOLUTION NO. 02— RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER VA- 2001 -AR -1442 FOR AN AFTER- THE -FACT VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91 -102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 2.3 —foot after - the- fact variance from the required rear yard setback of 10 feet to 7.7 feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A ", in a RMF -6 Zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that: The Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1442 filed by Kirk N. Sanders, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Lot 14, Sperlings Subdivision, Block B, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 12, of the Official Records of Collier County, Florida be and the same hereby is approved for a 2.3 —foot after - the -fact variance from the required rear yard setback of 10 feet to 7.7 feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A ", of the RMF -6 Zoning District wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions: 1. 7A 1. This variance is for the encroachment shown in Exhibit "A" only. Any other encroachment shall require a separate variance. 2. In the case of the destruction of the encroaching structure, for any reason, to an extent equal to or greater than 50 percent of the actual replacement cost of the structure at the time of its destruction, any reconstruction shall conform to the provisions of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of reconstruction. BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number VA- 2001 -AR -1442 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this day of , 2002. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: rfol Marjorie M. Student Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN 4 1004 FENCE CORNER ` I}` 0.27'NORTH �11j1 MA TEA i. 5 1' EAST / VAL VE •5 IRON ROD WIT.q LB 6746 CAPD SET •5 IRON ROD S88 57' SO' 5hf 0 00' ( pJ KITH SANDY LB -SB • 58 ' N 50. 03' ( M) 6746 CAP SET x w Y .a. a cur NAIL s c — TIN TAB FO AYO c � o m 100. 00' ( P C N) rgg. 02• IN) 500. 00'1 P) 50_03'( NI 50. OO'T P) SBB -- - 57' 50' N 649. 95' T N) 650. 00' f PJ - SPE"PL ! NG AVENUE '1NKi AB IL FOUNO FOPMEPL Y PINE R II DG = DRIVE 60 FOOT NIOE RIGHT- OF -NR+ VA -01 -AR -1442 =G, I WOM Exhibit "A" FENCE CORNEA FENCE CORNEA 3. 25' NORTH .5 l SAN ADO WITH SANDY LB 6746 CAP SET 7A 4. 0i'SOUTH 0. BI'NEST o. 22' MES, N8 •35' 5454x' 50. 02' M POWER POLE �E-- 1- m cur J urs — _ -UTS— -ANCHOR -"ANCHOR � m z 2' ft -1" RISER to be `20 AISFA 23.2' 10. 0', StruLture 0 •5 I AON ROD SHED removed 0 10 GRAPHIC SCALE 1N = cr NO CAP FOUND ONE STORY ;n o '� RESIDENCE c 10.0' 23. 2' LOT 14 BLOCK B FENCE CORNEA 1.65'EAST MALKMAY LOT 13 X� LOT 15 1� 23.0- `O O Q n) m M ww m w �+ Lu W 3t 10. 0' O O p c 1D O O W ° ONE Z Z a of CONC::': O 9. 5' 10. 2' GAA VEL FENCE CORNER ` I}` 0.27'NORTH �11j1 MA TEA i. 5 1' EAST / VAL VE •5 IRON ROD WIT.q LB 6746 CAPD SET •5 IRON ROD S88 57' SO' 5hf 0 00' ( pJ KITH SANDY LB -SB • 58 ' N 50. 03' ( M) 6746 CAP SET x w Y .a. a cur NAIL s c — TIN TAB FO AYO c � o m 100. 00' ( P C N) rgg. 02• IN) 500. 00'1 P) 50_03'( NI 50. OO'T P) SBB -- - 57' 50' N 649. 95' T N) 650. 00' f PJ - SPE"PL ! NG AVENUE '1NKi AB IL FOUNO FOPMEPL Y PINE R II DG = DRIVE 60 FOOT NIOE RIGHT- OF -NR+ VA -01 -AR -1442 =G, I WOM Exhibit "A" 17A January 16, 2002 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1442 (Sperlings Subdivision, Block B) Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Sunday, February 10, 2002, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Joanne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk Account # 113 - 138312 - 649110 Enclosure 17 A '" " NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 26, 2001, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1442, Kirk N. Sanders, requesting a 2.3 -foot after - the -fact variance from the required 10 -foot rear yard setback established for accessory structures to 7.7 feet for property located at 1139 Sperling Avenue, further described as Lot 14, Block B, Sperlings Subdivision, in Section 22 Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISISONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s /JoAnne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) o�.�t1E GIp�G'r (� y Dwight E. Brock Clerk January 16, 2002 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COWER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES. FLORIDA 34101 ,3044 Mr. Kirk N. Sanders P.O. Box 2481 Naples, FL 34102 1.7A " CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1442 (Sperling Avenue) Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK oanne R. A Clerk Enclosure 17A`4'"' Joanne R. Allen To: paperrell @naplesnews.com Subject: VA- 2001 -AR -1442 (Sperlings Subdivision, Block B) Hi Pam: Another advertisement for you and your staff. Kindly advertise the Petition on Sunday, February 10, 2002. Again, thanks for all of your help. JoAnne VA- 2001- AR- 1442.d oc.dot 11� VA- 2001 -AR -1442. DOC 7A' Joanne R. Allen From: System Administrator [postmaster @naplesnews.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 3:59 PM To: Joanne R. Allen Subject: Delivered: VA- 2001 -AR -1442 (Sperlings Subdivision, Block B) LLJ VA- 2001 -AR -1442 (Sperlings Sub... «VA- 2001 -AR -1442 (Sperlings Subdivision, Block B)>> Your message To: 'paperrell @naplesnews.coml Subject: VA- 2001 -AR -1442 (Sperlings Subdivision, Block B) Sent: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:04:47 -0500 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Perrell, Pamela on Wed, 16 Jan 2002 15:58:40 -0500 1 Nts!, s r �'. Ly News (4,pLes, ` -L 34102 Affida✓it of Publ'° -1tion Jeples 1,eiLy News BO:Anu OF '.vrJNT" COMN ±SF ::.TIERS CMIS AORT -N po m,, 413x16 FL 34104016 6 I k r REFERE-E: '101230 '. 313831 ?649 5839577= N0j'I I Skate of it °'i Ccunty or' f,LLier before ne undersigned - i:'th. ;ty, personally, appezrzu U. r aml . 4,n car bath gays that she- serve .krc Asti„ .a..t c,>rpc, 3.,s Secretar- of the Napr.cs D_ ly leis, a d it-, newspaper published it Nap Les, it CoLLier C: >ur':y, rLorida: th-ir the attached cloy ..r ad-✓e ti.Ning was published in 'said :iewspr+p r a:i dr Qs Affiant `,ii•th+er ::'rs tha: ; +e said ospLes Daily r'ews 's a .iewspaloer• published at NApl.e3, in said COLLier ,;aunty, F%.c: ;-Ia. and =chat the said news;;a,per has hereto fc,ra been cc nt.iruously in saiei (,*LLier Coo• -cy, f Wrid'r, ea .-h day and has Lien or erev as secorl clalts mail. „,.r: ... 2L c'rrc: Fuc: off ce it KapLe::, in raid cr'.Cp- rr. rty, FLcridr -, sor 3 per-iod of 1 year next preceding the fir=: pubLice ion e' :he c•�p_ Nu;rerr i rbment - and af' i ant -Ft-rz:her says .ha': st - has � .Jthir p. .iiei nor prornse ` any pe°srr, fi ,m or - or}sar'etion any disc _unrt, ••eba-,e, co %m-ls.ai_, or rtrkno fai the p:arpose c,, >ecu'�'?rg 1.1ii- ad rt,6ement far W,U;tior it the srl, .J ne 7sp, re, .. 1 7A VA-2001-AR-1442 421HEARING 1191r; hereby given mss H��m Isl of Collier ruT will hold a public or ng on Tuesday, ibruary 26, 2001, In the wrdroo 3rd Floor, li BGovem= ent Center, 3301 East amiaml Teal4 Naples orido. The mWn9 will win at 9:00 A.& The Board will consid- er Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1442, Kirk N. Sanders, requesting a 2.3 -foot Vo%r- the -fact variance an the re- quired ctb setback any a „All Persons . r speak on any' em must reols- the County Aa- r prior to pre - of the agenda e addressed In- peckers will be r 5 minutes on o The soled of lual to speak on an organization Is entlf pped. y aCChnDOarr, as y De al- minutes to speak r. s wishing to', a Ara Si Ack:' 0'1'11 INCA aeTOM TM rtoara Will ae- IL D O d 02/,1 1102 come a permanent part of the record Any person who decid- es, to Board- p decision e- S i mp t u -r e 7 L flf f i a!� : _. ' the Board wsli need a re- ,._W__ _ ___._ _ _ Y.._ ____.._ . _ _.. _ cord of the proceedings 1 pertaining thereto and T;r _ : °A;, i L ^e lnc this o c' Qr� e_ mafhs� —a need--to d of the proceedings r117 de which record in- tie testimon and ag upon which the Donna Che D OF COUNTY Y 6AISIS0NERS My Commission DD00338 ip COUNTY, Fl. Explres September 11, 2005 JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, Btr�/RS /J a R. Allen, Clerk Vkyj'sm D pm 17A RESOLUTION NO. 02— 12 2 RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER VA- 2001 -AR -1442 FOR AN AFTER- THE -FACT VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91 -102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 2.3 —foot after - the- fact variance from the required rear yard setback of 10 feet to 7.7 feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A ", in a RMF -6 Zone for an accessory structure for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that: The Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1442 filed by Kirk N. Sanders, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Lot 14, Sperlings Subdivision, Block B, as recorded in Plat Book 4, Page 12, of the Official Records of Collier County, Florida be and the same hereby is approved for a 2.3 —foot after - the -fact variance from the required rear yard setback of 10 feet to 7.7 feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A ", of the RMF -6 Zoning District wherein said property is located, subject to the following conditions: 17A 1. This variance is for the encroachment shown in Exhibit "A" only. Any other encroachment shall require a separate variance. 2. In the case of the destruction of the encroaching structure, for any reason, to an extent equal to or greater than 50 percent of the actual replacement cost of the structure at the time of its destruction, any reconstruction shall conform to the provisions of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of reconstruction. BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number VA- 2001 -AR -1442 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. r ' f) `APne this day of 2002. ATTB� DWIT: E'. BROCK, Clerk `dew�� stdi• Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Matjoik M. Student Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA /- ■aA //i %ii/r�� CHAERMAN FENCE CORNER 4. Of' SOUTH r 0.22- NEST POWER ROLE -UTS -- �, R 1 SER p- pp •5 IRON ROD GRAPHIC SCALE IN FEET NO CAP FOUND .5 IRON ROD - FENCE CORNER KITH SANDY LB 3.25-NORTH 67A6 CAP SET 0. BI . NEST POWER 1860 3 ,E 50. 02' M POLE GUY J m uTS — — -- ANCHOR -' Z ?�1 RISER ONE STORY ;n t9d 4 ` SPHAL FENCE CORNER FiDAVE •5 IRON ROD 0. CE NORTH MA TEA 6746 CAPDSET 1.5f'£AST VALVE • 5 IRON ROD S88 57' S0' W 50. 00' t P I M 1 TH SANDY LB 8 '58' 50. 03' 5746 CAP SET z .� n 0 CUT NAIL 9 c TIN TAB FO )NO o c 0o. DO,( P C N) 92' f M) 500. 00' 1 PJ 5O. 03.1 M) 50. 00'( P) - -- - - ag9. - - See '- 'S7'50'K 6/9. 95'(Ml 650.00'(P) - � IT SPE�RL l NG AVENUE TINKTABIFOLND F6PMERL Y P 1 NE RIDGE DA r VE 60 FOOT WIDE RIGHT- IIF -NR+ VA -01 -AR -1442 Is- a- _ -� Exhibit "A" __ LOT 14 BLOCK B FENCE CORNER CO NC �!. 96' EAST MALKWAY LOT 13 LOT 15 O ui In Ln M t17 `+ W W m o �n O O lt1 p ° ONE STORY ° K L7 RESIDENCE N O O • • • �+ e. 0 0 0 cn t17 Z• Z q q ...� CONC:. ; 01 GRA VEL ` SPHAL FENCE CORNER FiDAVE •5 IRON ROD 0. CE NORTH MA TEA 6746 CAPDSET 1.5f'£AST VALVE • 5 IRON ROD S88 57' S0' W 50. 00' t P I M 1 TH SANDY LB 8 '58' 50. 03' 5746 CAP SET z .� n 0 CUT NAIL 9 c TIN TAB FO )NO o c 0o. DO,( P C N) 92' f M) 500. 00' 1 PJ 5O. 03.1 M) 50. 00'( P) - -- - - ag9. - - See '- 'S7'50'K 6/9. 95'(Ml 650.00'(P) - � IT SPE�RL l NG AVENUE TINKTABIFOLND F6PMERL Y P 1 NE RIDGE DA r VE 60 FOOT WIDE RIGHT- IIF -NR+ VA -01 -AR -1442 Is- a- _ -� Exhibit "A" __ COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS I A To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: 17C , XXX Normal Legal Advertisement O Other: (Display Adv., location, etc.) **********, r, r«***, r, r* w«***.********•** r***. w****«****«, r.**t w* �** w** w*. t* t *,► * * *ws *r• * * « * *r * * * * * * *� * *r * ** Originating Dept: Div: Comm.Dev.Serv./Planning Person: Kay D e s e l em , A I C P Date: 1/16/02 Petition No. (If none, give brief description): VA- 2001 -AR -1526 Petitioner: (Name & Address): Kraft Construction Company, Inc., 2606 S. Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Fla. 34104 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Diocese of Venice Catholic Church,John J. Nevins as Bishop 1000 Pine Brook Road, Venice,Fla 34292 Hearing before 0 BCC 0 BZA 0 Other 2 1 Z(a /CrZ Requested Hearing date: Based on advertisement appearing 15 days before hearing. Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): XXX Naples Daily News 0 Other 0 Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: VA-2001-AR-1526, Kraft Construction Company, Inc., representing Diocese of Venice Catholic Church, requesting a 6.5 foot variance from the required 30 foot front yard setback to 23.5 feet for property located at 5225 Golden Gate Parkway, in Section 28, TownsWp 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? XXX Yes 0 No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: 113 - 138312- 649110 Reviewed by: -:1k 4%oj F 7MANNead List Attachments: Approved by: 1- 1(0 -11Z Date County Manager DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS Date A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to codiplete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document Iis involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: 0 County Manager agenda file: to 0 Requesting Division Q Original Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. *, r*** w* www*** rr*.«*«««**•. �* w«* �* r« wwr*****.**+ r* f****** �wrr«*«+ r*.***** w*** *wrww * *.�. * *rrr *w. * * * * * * * * * * * ** FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: Date Received: a z. Date of Public hearing: o z.- Date Advertised: RESOLUTION — 17C 's y- U ON NO. 02 RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER VA- 2001 -AR -1526 FOR A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91 -102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 6.5 —foot variance from the required front yard setback of 30 feet to 23.5 feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A ", in a RSF -3 Zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory proviFion and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that: The Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1526 filed by Kraft Construction Company, representing Diocese of Venice Catholic Church, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Exhibit "B" be and the same hereby is approved for a 6.5 -foot variance from the required front yard setback of 30 feet to 23.5 feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A ", of the RSF -3 Zoning District wherein said property is located, subject to the following condition: 1. This variance is only for an unenclosed and unroofed stairway, as shown in Exhibit "A ". All other additions and new constructions must comply with the requirements of the Collier County Land Development Code. 17 C " 2. In the case of the destruction of the encroaching structure, for any reason, to an extent equal to or greater than 50 percent of the actual replacement cost of the structure at the time of its destruction, any reconstruction shall conform to the provisions of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of reconstruction. BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number VA- 2001 -1526 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Marjorie M. Student Assistant County Attorney day of 2002. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN ► I). I WWVMVJ. 1j%_ 4 t! EI. i l � 1ail LAWS l- r -. I " . . . . . . ow ..... . . . . . W, env W,- W, Elm1 '4 A � Ic �+ J I ► I). I WWVMVJ. 1j%_ 4 t! EI. i l � 1ail LAWS 5 T. M n or t-M SETON CHURCH CONDITIONAL USE PLAN mom FUIr A !E;PEC-rRUrv11 I l- r -. I " . . . . . . ow ..... . . . . . W, env W,- W, Elm1 '4 5 T. M n or t-M SETON CHURCH CONDITIONAL USE PLAN mom FUIr A !E;PEC-rRUrv11 I 17C " " ATTACHMENT #1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION_ (O.R. 1112, PG. 1617) ALL OF BLOCK 204 AND 205 UNIT 6 OF GOLDEN GATE ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 5, PAGES 124 -134,: INCLUSIVE OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. THAT PORTION OF 53rd STREET S.W. BETWEEN BLOCKS 204 AND 205, AS WELL AS CERTAIN EASEMENTS BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL LOTS 1r`i017MiN BLOCKS 204 AND 205, WERE VACATED BY COWER COUNTY RESOLU71ON NUMBER 79 -20 RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 795 AT PAGE 1734 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLDER COUNTY, FLORIDA ZONING IS RSF -3 VA- 2001 -AR -1526 EXHIBIT B I 7 r, . !.- January 16, 2002 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1526 (St. Elizabeth Seton) Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced petition on Sunday, February 10, 2002, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Joanne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk Account #113 - 138312 - 649110 17C "I NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on Tuesday, February 26, 2002, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1526, filed by Kraft Construction Company, representing Diocese of Venice Catholic Church requesting a 6.5 -foot variance from the required front yard setback of 30 feet to 23.5 feet for property located at 5225 Golden Gate Parkway, in Section 28, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. if recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings includes the testimony and evidence upon which the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISISONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s /JoAnne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) the Board will need a therefore, may need to is made, which record appeal is based. U 4 Dwight E. Brock Clerk January 16, 2002 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101 -3044 Kraft Construction Company, Inc,. 2606 S. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 17C '04"l- CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1526 (St. Elizabeth Seton) Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK oanne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk Enclosure o�.�t1B ClIpCGf� U y COUP Dwight E. Brock Clerk January 16, 2002 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101 ,3044 Diocese of Venice Catholic Church Bishop John J. Nevins 1000 Pine Brook Road Venice, FL 34292 17 r, CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1526 (St. Elizabeth Seton) Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK anne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk Enclosure 17C "I Joanne R. Allen To: paperrell @naplesnews.com Subject: Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1526 (St. Elizabeth Seton) Pam, Kindly advertise the enclosed petition on Sunday, February 10, 2002. Thank you, as always, for your help. JoAnne 9-� VA- 2001- AR- 1526.d oc.dot 11� VA- 2001 -AR -1526. DOC Joanne R. Allen From: System Administrator [postmaster @naplesnews.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 4:07 PM To: Joanne R. Allen Subject: Delivered: Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1526 (St. Elizabeth Seton) LLJ Petition �-2001 -AR-1 526 (St. I 7 -" ' <<Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1526 (St. Elizabeth Seton)>> Your message To: 'paperrell @naplesnews.com' Subject: Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1526 (St. Elizabeth Seton) Sent: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:13:06 -0500 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Perrell, Pamela on Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:06:56 -0500 1 'iaplas D. il.y Mews Naples, iL 341U2 affidavit Jf P;sbi.icat "on Maples Tsai iy New: BOA;.) O'" COUNT r C&NAl. SIONERS PO 3CX 41A16 API_ i it. 34101- QW I I .'LFE .Ei:CE: :11.11 _'30 113133? 1261:9'1 58395£. J !'A- r'W'- AR -152E N01, Fts,e of i' orida Counxy of Col[ er Br'nr- the . riders '3" ;..i author•:cv, persc„r ly al neared B. ..amb. who an .,aath says that she serves i us t to A si, an C— porute s --cretary .if the Nagle'; Deily Nbws, a rl4ily nelspsper, putlished at Naples, Coumcy, Aor ida: that ti.e ettacLee copy of ad.erfising was !ubklshed in said n•wspap or1 fates lisced T 7fia.it fur her sae that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper puv`ishe,�' at Haplrs, in said Collier County, F _oride, .?nrl that .',e sa::it n,WSpaper '. =s heretofore been ct.ttiruously ftsAished ir" said Co%' ier Cot °nt , I iorida, each day and Jhas he-z tin erei as secsnd cLess mail p :natter at tLe post office Maples, ' +ti said Cr'.lie.- Tuurty; Florid:, for a M�riod of 1 year, next p. ecedin? rho. first _:1l �.icaf "on of the at:tachei1 co y of r iv..- tisemen ai.d af`ian'_ f irth ^r s: ys th::t she ;.aa neithe^ :)91;1 !or i prom "sera ny 7eram, f rrn cr, cc-poraticn :,ny i dis: -oun -eb3t e, con,nissicn c. ,eflmc: for tiia urpose sec ring tl' 3dvc ?!•tisa*mer.c for public'Lic;; i<. ':ha za',i rrewspaf,:r. POBLASPEO ON: 02/10 i eD SPA"t: 9 "4 .'V'i INt4 FILED ON: O ,t11 /02 Y Si�jns;t•!raW if A' ` ?anc ,w 1rr, tc -:.:d sr bs. ribed b e me t' is L� of t •_,uQ� rno,,;- by lone — Donna Chesney My Commission DDO58338 •ov rA" Expiros September 11, 2005 *N %o0 � FvR 15 2002 om%' E 17C on Tuesday, 26, 2002, In afi44toohrre o n Buldinp; :ounty Govern rater, 3301 East Trail, Naples rho meeting wl ' wall consid- stitlon VA- t -1526, flied by Constrruction ni *'se ref Veennice c Church re- nt, a 6.5 -foot eiront� yard set - f 30 feet too 3.5 ' ,225 hip 49 South, 26 East_,, C011ler 'All Persons o speak on anv Itmtied to 5 minutes on any =The selection Of an Individual to speak an behalf of an orgoiigzeadtlon ecoonized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group Id 10 minnuutesstto speak on an Item. a mlmmum or J womb prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials In- tended to be Considered by the Baird shall be sub - mi ted to the appropriate County staff a min nwm of seven days prior to the public hearlm Ali malarl- al used in preser*aWs before the Board wtil be- come a permanent part of the I An peerrson who decid- es to appeal a decision of the Board will need a re- cord of the proceedings pertaining thereto and ttrttearteefare array need to record � a -proceedings is � which record in- cludes fti0 testimony and evidence upon which the COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Cpi�AIRMAN �A' DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK (B Clerke R. Allen, Feb.1 No. 1961858 17C RESOLUTION NO. 02— 12 3 RELATING TO PETITION NUMBER VA- 2001 -AR -1526 FOR A VARIANCE ON PROPERTY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED IN COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Legislature of the State of Florida in Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, has conferred on all counties in Florida the power to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and WHEREAS, the County pursuant thereto has adopted a Land Development Code (Ordinance No. 91 -102) which establishes regulations for the zoning of particular geographic divisions of the County, among which is the granting of variances; and WHEREAS, the Board of Zoning Appeals, being the duly elected constituted Board of the area hereby affected, has held a public hearing after notice as in said regulations made and provided, and has considered the advisability of a 6.5 —foot variance from the required front yard setback of 30 feet to 23.5 feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A ", in a RSF -3 Zone for the property hereinafter described, and has found as a matter of fact that satisfactory provision and arrangement have been made concerning all applicable matters required by said regulations and in accordance with Section 2.7.5 of the Zoning Regulations of said Land Development Code for the unincorporated area of Collier County; and WHEREAS, all interested parties have been given opportunity to be heard by this Board in public meeting assembled, and the Board having considered all matters presented; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida, that: The Petition VA- 2001 -AR -1526 filed by Kraft Construction Company, representing Diocese of Venice Catholic Church, with respect to the property hereinafter described as: Exhibit "B" be and the same hereby is approved for a 6.5 -foot variance from the required front yard setback of 30 feet to 23.5 feet as shown on the attached plot plan, Exhibit "A ", of the RSF -3 Zoning District wherein said property is located, subject to the following condition: 1. This variance is only for an unenclosed and unroofed stairway, as shown in Exhibit "A ". All other additions and new constructions must comply with the requirements of the Collier County Land Development Code. 1 7 C ` 2. In the case of the destruction of the encroaching structure, for any reason, to an extent equal to or greater than 50 percent of the actual replacement cost of the structure at the time of its destruction, any reconstruction shall conform to the provisions of the Land Development Code in effect at the time of reconstruction. BE IT RESOLVED that this Resolution relating to Petition Number VA- 2001 -1526 be recorded in the minutes of this Board. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. Done this cZ 4 ;GCo day of—. , 2002. 4t S A, -;AT S'_' `IS�HT E..BROCK, Clerk f of xllj Y AtUltt at to Cha4elan's s1 - phiproved a��Form and Legal Sufficiency: Matj o4 M. Student Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS COLLIER • FLORIDA BY: JAMVVN. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN 4 qep 18 01.10:32a Spectrum Engineering S41 277 1786 p.6 A 1 7C_ aw"a ®srbars Canal. 114 fill I F191 .r� ga ST. ELQABE!'H SETON CHURCH CONDITIONAL USE PLAN "M oxxmw ear moat T PEi-ITION CU -98 -1 Exhibit "K i u 17C LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (O.R. 1112, PG. 1617) ALL OF BLOCK 204 AND 205 UNIT 6 OF GOLDEN GATE ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK .5, PAGES 124 -134,: INCLUSIVE OF THE PUBUC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA THAT PORTION OF 53rd STREET S.W. BETWEEN BLOCKS 204 AND 205, AS WELL AS CERTAIN EASEMENTS BETWEEN INDIVIDUAL LOTS WITHIN BLOCKS 204 AND 205, WERE VACATED BY COLLIER COUNTY RESOLUTION NUMBER 79 -20 RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 795 AT PAGE 1734 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Exhibit "B" VA -01 -AR -1526 i COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC HEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: ✓ ✓ ✓ Normal legal Advertisement ❑ Other: r (Display Adv., location, etc.) ***, r*, r*, r, r•*, r******.***********,►************** r, r****, r«***•,►******• ie, t*, tr* wt ,r,rr,r *,rw *,►•,►,w+.,►•,► * *,r Originating Dept/ Div: Comm.Dev.Serv./Planning Person: Rick Grigg 0 e +G GQ rGG-s 659 -E,73 I Date: January 9, 2002 Petition No. (If none, give brief description): AVPLAT200I -AR 1835 (MEDITERRA PARCEL 111 LOTS 7 & 8) Petitioner: (Name & Address): Long Bay Partners, LLC 3451 Bonita Bay Blvd., Suite 202 Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Name & Address of any person(s) to be notified by Clerk's Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) 1) Chris Van Buskirk c/o Barraco & Assoc., Inc. 2121 West First Street, Suite 4 Ft. Meyers, Fl 33901 (Agent) Hearing before ✓ ✓ ✓ BCC BZA Other Requested Hearing date: FEBRUARY 26, 2002 Newspaper(s) to be used: (Complete only if important): ✓ ✓ ✓ Naples Daily News Other ✓ ✓ ✓ Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal description & common location & Size: PETITION AVPLAT2001- AR1835 TO DISCLAIM, RENOUNCE AND VACATE THE COUNTY'S AND THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN THE 15' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED ALONG THE LOT LINE COMMON TO LOTS 7 AND 8, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF "MEDITERRA PARCEL 111" AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 37, PAGES 8 THROUGH 9, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOCATED IN SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST. Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising cost? ✓ ✓ ✓ Yes ❑ No If Yes, what account should be charged for advertising costs: For Advertising costs, charge to: P.O. 912501 For Recording costs, charge to: 113 - 138312- 649030 , Rev'ewed by: Approved by- Department Director Date County Administrator Date List Attachments: 1) RESOLUTION WITH EXHIBIT "A" ( THERE IS NO LIST OF ABUTTING OWNERS) DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS A. For hearings before BCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one copy and obtain Division Head approval before submitting to County Manager. Note: If legal document is involved, be sure that any necessary legal review, or request for same, is submitted to County Attorney before submitting to County Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: ✓ ✓ ✓ County Manager agenda file: ✓ ✓ ✓ Requesting Division ✓ ✓ ✓ Original to Clerk's Office B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office, retaining a copy for file. **, t•* r, ►r * :,rw,r,rr.,r••s•+rw,t *,r,r.* *,r *,rtwv�,r.,rvr *,ts,t *,r,rwr* * r, rr•***, r.*.** wwww .,t. :r *,t»w.w *r+r,r+rw,t *w * *,r• FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY- Date Received: lJr S e Date of Public hearing: 0 a 10 Z Date Advertised: a 11 17D RESOLUTION NO. 2002- RESOLUTION FOR PETITION AVPLAT2001- AR1835 TO DISCLAIM, RENOUNCE AND VACATE THE COUNTY'S AND THE PUBLIC'S INTEREST IN THE 15' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED ALONG THE LOT LINE COMMON TO LOTS 7 AND 8, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF "MEDITERRA PARCEL 111" AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 37, PAGES 8 THROUGH 9, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOCATED IN SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 177.101, Florida Statutes, Barraco and Associates, Inc. as agent for the petitioner, Long Bay Partners LLC, does hereby request the vacation of the 15' wide Drainage Easement along the lot line common to Lots 7 and 8, as depicted on the plat of "Mediterra Parcel 111" as recorded in Plat Book 37, Pages 8 through 9, Public Records of Collier County, Florida, located in Section 11, Township 48 South, Range 25 East; and WHEREAS, the Board has this day held a public hearing to consider vacating said 15' wide Drainage Easement along the lot line common to Lots 7 and 8, as more fully described below, and notice of said public hearing to vacate was given as required by law; and WHEREAS, the granting of the vacation will not adversely affect the ownership or right of convenient access of other property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the County's and the Public's interest in a Drainage Easement in, the following more particularly described lands be and is hereby disclaimed, renounced and vacated: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk to the Board is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida, and to make proper notation of this vacation on the recorded plat as referenced above. This Resolution is adopted this day of , 2002, after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DATED: ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and legal s cienc Patrick G. White, Esq. Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: James N. Colstta;.- Chairman Z. 1 1 GY 1 7 •d \ 7 r 1 l 00 O� 0 N� N/ z R Z r C7 W HI80N 8 U. 0 0 4. u H o � e J w �2 O Egg 0 om a� Had .>- O MP � m X Z .r r. F- D��F~.. m d U2 yWe R2 .mS� vLL W W� <aW1L LLI som6��3� e 17D 17D 1-h January 16, 2002 Ms. Pam Perrell Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: AVPLAT2001 -AR1 835 (Mediterra Parcel 111 Lots 7 & 8) Dear Pam: Please advertise the above referenced notice on Sunday, February 10, 2002, and again on Sunday, February 17, 2002, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, JoAnne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk P.O. # 912501 170 'r NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING Notice is hereby given that the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County will hold a public hearing on February 26, 2002, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida. The meeting will begin at 9:00 A.M. The Board will consider Petition AVPLAT- 2001- AR1835, Chris VanBuskirk, Esq., Barraco & Associates, Inc., as agent for the petitioner, Long Bay Partners, LLC, requesting to disclaim, renounce and vacate the County's and the public's interest in the 15' wide drainage easement located along the lot line common to Lots 7 & 8, according to the plat of "Mediterra Parcel 111 ", as recorded in Plat Book 37, Pages 8 through 9, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. The property is located in Section 11, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. NOTE: All Persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must register with the County Administrator prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be limited to 5 minutes on any item. The selection of an individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chair, a spokesperson for a group or organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All material used in presentations before the Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISISONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA JAMES N. COLETTA, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By: /s /JoAnne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) O�gf1E GRCG? V y C Dwight E. Brock Clerk January 16, 2002 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101 -3044 Chris VanBuskirk, Esq. Barraco & Associates, Inc. 2121 West First Street, Suite 4 Ft. Meyers, Florida 33901 17D CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AVPLAT2001- AR1835 (Mediterra Parcel 111, Lots 7 & 8) Dear Agent: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2002 and again on Sunday February 17, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK 5;;k, ?, GZ//� oanne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk Enclosure O�gt1E ClRCG� w c V �`y Dwight E. Brock Clerk January 16, 2002 County of Collier CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COWER COUNTY COURTHOUSE 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 341013044 Long Bay Partners, LLC 3451 Bonita Bay Blvd. Suite 202 Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 17D CIRCUIT COURT COUNTY COURT COUNTY RECORDER CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Re: Notice of Public Hearing to consider Petition AVPLAT2001- AR1835 (Mediterra Parcel 111, Lots 7 & 8) Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 26, 2002, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, February 10, 2002 and again on Sunday February 17, 2002. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK oanne R. Allen, Deputy Clerk Enclosure 17D "''! Joanne R. Allen To: paperrell @naplesnews.com Subject: AVPIat2001- ar1835 (Mediterra Parcel 111 Lots 7 & 8) Hi Pam: Kindly advertise the attached notice on Sunday, February 10 and again on Sunday February 17, 2002 per the enclosed memo. Thank you for your help. JoAnne AVPLAT2001 -AR 18 35.DOC AVPLAT2001 -AR18 35.doc Joanne R. Allen From: System Administrator [postmaster @naplesnews.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:31 AM To: Joanne R. Allen Subject: Delivered: AVPlat2001- ar1835 (Mediterra Parcel 111 Lots 7 & 8) 4,VPIat2001- ar1835 (Mediterra P... 17D '•f <<AVPlat200l- arl835 (Mediterra Parcel 111 Lots 7 & 8)>> Your message To: 'paperrell @naplesnews.com' Subject: AVPlat200l- arl835 (Mediterra Parcel 111 Lots 7 & 8) Sent: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:36:45 -0500 was delivered to the following recipient(s): Perrell, Pamela on Wed, 16 Jan 2002 09:30:42 -0500 1 Plapl.eis Da: 'y News Naple,, FL 34`,02 Affidavit of Pubticatiun Nay ' es Doi Ly Ness i IF .0UNTY �'JMMI,,SIONERS MR'S HORTO" Po BOY. 4130 i6 .'WLFS fL 34'!01 - ?716 REFER'MC -: 001230 912501 583999`71 WLAT2001- IR18`5 NO State F:c -t'la County ,o!' Cc' -lie, Before the undersign,' aF.nccrity, person• *ley appear, -d 3. inmb. who -n oath s;.,vs the � sha serve: as the its::istent forpurit,.a Secretary rf the Mapl.ea Uis y a ws, s, 3a9: newspaper published at Naplea:,� ir, Collie, County, Florida: -hat tho attac ed cop of rrs:,ertising era_ publshed in said newsps; er on ! Lates listec. Af `iant fu.1her sray� that t'ie said Naples Daily Nee is •9 newspap:,:r published ,%t Naples, in said Collier C(. ,. ;ity, � Larida, r.nd that the said n 4spape has here xforr ':)e:7 i - ont i nu,us Ly ir, z Ccl.tier County, FLorida, Each � y and h ;s been nl,ered as seco,ed ;lass mail matter it the pest of Tice i,, 'lap Les in said c:oa i r Corr y, Florida, fe- a pericri ,f 1 year r +t nr e t first rrblicat or, of the attnc`eed zopy W advar, ter:.Mt; avid +ifiant � i'ui ther s2ys Jjet she h.is nE ;tiler :.raid nor i omised ar, ;per -scn, firm r.r corporation any d . scov- :, rebate. comm i s:' i� :n e.r r+:Yund for he i purposa; c-F e:curinv7 xlnis ad er:isement for public'_`an in tl:e s,iii nawspape.�. Fi;3 lsljE,i U": 02j1J 021'," AD SPACE: 102.00'�, I. —H FILED ON' 3zenii sire cf ,,%f ,� Cr; i sc!? sc: iheu ' r: rr e th•1Z LSL clay of _ .., 2i Q�� Per 3ena. y a ;richer t,; mr jo! �4p, 'N'k, Donna Chesney �vZ My Commission DD0583 J np Expires September 11, 2005 17D - AVPLAT2001 -ARIM NOTICE OF 4 la HEARING No given that the gBa�d of Commlastoners of Collar Caurd a will hold a pub2inbk 3rd F fkwrtedmMf� Building, Col ier rdy Government Center 3301 East Taml4ml Trail, Naples, Florida. The O µmeTMehM en will begin at 9-A0 Board or Petition 2001- AR1835 Chris VonBuskirk, Esq., Bar• Inc as agent for the • pqe0t't�i, tiorw, Long Bay 91 ners, LLC, requesting a to disclaim, renounce and vacate the Coun- Zse:%**0theU15'k wld U 'd* along the Tine common to Lois 7 d 8 ;. occordino to the plat of Medlterrpa�Paarrcel r... MI r vs reeca dad � ie.. ;A NOTE: All Persons ,00shing to speak on any the County Ad- `�kadlan ot= = .'4flvidrwl speakers will Ibe ,limped to 5 minutes on any Item. The selection of .'cm Individual to speak on .`behalf of on argallzaHon ,'br group is encouraged K .'recognized by the Clair, a x'spoke6M1e1"lr0n for a ou .'or orgg44nnlz�aHko,nn m�ay aP .�"toflaan 0 minuPes to speak Persons wishing to Ihave Masni or oophk In rpe 1 card agenda packets mutt submit stdd material inimum of 3 weeks to the respective kit a riIwr mcddals, n- 0 Xoti rty sW .a ' minin of seven days prior to uses a,. °preserrtattorrrs are the Board will be- red monent part of nY�p awtw deNof. dofof sit* pro °rvs talninp Cher to o and rolore may need to ure 4xi a verbatim OLETTA, BROCK, ke R. Alkm, in this docu merit when received. RESOLUTION NO. 2002- 124 17 D RESOLUTION FOR PETITION AVPLA'1 2001- AR1835 TO DISCLAIM, RENOUNCE AND VACATE THE COUNTY'S AND THE P1113LIC'S INTEREST IN THE 15' WIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT LOCATED ALONG THE LOT I.1NE COMMON TO LOTS 7 AND 8, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF "MEDITE,RRA PARCEL 1! 1" AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 37, PAGES 8 THROUGH 9, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. LOCATED IN SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST. WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 177.101, Florida Statutes, Barraco and Associates, Inc. as agent for the petitioner, Long Bay Partners LLC, does hereby request the vacation of the 15' wide Drainage Easement along the lot line common to Lots 7 and 8, as depicted on the plat of "Mediterra Parcel 111" as recorded in Plat Book 37, Pages 8 through 1)_ Public Records of Collier County, Florida, located in Section 11, Township 48 South, Range 25 East: and WHEREAS, the Board has this day held a public hearing to consider vacating said 15' wide Drainage Easement along the lot line common to Lots 7 and 8, as more fully described below, and notice of said public hearing to vacate was given as rcyuired by law; and WHEREAS, the granting of the vacation will not adversely affect the ownership or right of convenient access of other property owners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED Bl- THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that the County's and the Public's interest in a Drainage Easement in the following more particularly described lands be and is hereby disclaimed, renounced and vacated: See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that Ihc Clerk to the Board is hereby directed to record a certified copy of this Resolution in the Officio! IZecords of Collier County, Florida, and to make proper notation of this vacation on the recorded plat as referenced above. This Resolution is adopted this o14 ,-tZ day of ' 2002, after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DATED. ATTEST: , ,1WIdHT E. $�,OCk,:Clerk dputy lei7cT Attest ' '%1 Cha j rnn - S $"saw" s+all* roved as to form and 1 ial suf ienc t Patrick G. White, Esq. Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNT , FLORIDA BY: Ja c o Irma 2939652 OR; 2989 PG; 0701 RECORDED in OFFICIAL RECORDS of COLLIER COUNTY, FL 02/28/2002 at 10:57AN DWIGHT B. BROCK, CLERK REC FEE 10.50 COFIBS 2.00 Retn: CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR BIT 7240 O g &1 g O w~ is i10 Cd � �S�MENZ 1 OGY �j(lt� �MrGpfT 1 7 \ 7 r I y \ - 1 1 00 c� z z z w ra 111 .�� H12iON $ = m o U. O ZO Z w O CL ° a 0 0 N O < 0 ° zZ zp W 6 W Cmyj w C vO i W y �NNQQ O ,20� C C7 C�F-� Uf/QI JWyW g NZW Ww� h. O o`�' aW= {�2 LL °� m' y; W�06W ZoW Z°,(�w ,)LL 2 ww Z�m TZwOw °Wyq a p rJZ9p �U��Op0@- WWW:-- ,+ -yq ?W� moz OtngOW. OQW- 0�iiJ2O U 3J�I)>pC�F w c7 ww maw6 WWUa z pZ <— x ^' d 001l1GQ. W �(~A° Q F�y,�� wQ? O z f 7 QKtA�w2F r�lV �fiw Vl 2 °wa w r� Z u, ap$ p �aa�OpQp�y"N LRL, :u Wq -9 sy a 0ziLLWm?irr��7[, 0 �� wWp�zpp �m LLJ g W G W U U W ZZ IWiVZt�FZ�+yUV Z�F�Fa- Q�QZjp� U p v� 300(A 01- ZI- W dO�Wy W� W �p'pwin Q h Q Q LLI W y Q ° Q�U�:°m�ng��aw��3?UmaQ-,z = �LL� �¢ O O r a) (L W z6.' 17D