Loading...
Backup Documents 06/27/2017 Item #11G 1 1 G 411 ClN • PqS 17N c'.''' 4s.' f .. e- _.._.::,_.:_.. _ ... oll9nd)(ItlOa NOLS`JNIAII I % 1 ACC[Sy IN. � •T L, -.....+"� -t-_.._.. III YII o Al Oof ._ __a�� O "tom .s,-. IN. niOM a 1 I [>71t\"; Q� 1 11 el mH mx : ; 7It _==___ 1 / / ' I, �;="� gym ; 9 A _P,,, 1,1 ,a �.• .`m r"Fyo g it g g / 1 i /,��' /IIIA' Cll. 2. 3 I //lrf 11l i i `Lf \ IiI,I���4Ilrr���' ,., d� dA • -- `� #.r �I'\ i 1 I 4161:1;,-;,-- 7Ii 5, p oo u . . a o p .?:3 J� / 1 ` I� i' ag a a a a a a $ J' j // ff% 2" ~'Ilii ' /) I i I, D D \a / \SII /.�d9' I `I I -`1 I li !I s'.ais,JuN>np�ls...- --.-.�.�_ooTo g. N j�a� I r ii 1 III I/50 ( : iN r $ II i �w .- H -- I aA o o \ I I 11 /% ;ass$ >8>$°,1ppaspassssssssnssssss's .z akin §1kkkp9kkkkkkSkkkkSkkkk'.-o o / l // //// N: 000580 42120/0 o 00�a:0008 SL:^.,s Sm 0-'9ffis 0`d8`= ' lr I /jff , �1/ m >vvvai & i§gi?�svH > u --....:1---' „,,-!,moi--"'1 `,}\ \ / / 1 / //f // y�/ -� i \ti\ / / i �..m as�m��N4�4gg���a�aa��aaaaaaaa } `''� l I 7 / /// , F3 S S$k S p k 8 k 8 i9 E b S k k k$g k S S k k$k k \ 1 z ` I 1 ////, ,� >Nrjj-a �I 1 icoo I c ' o n r / p� .A Svc--=,� Vm i �; 'c 0 mD -mp"1 pP11 // // z� � �N��.,� T� 9 m D �z �fi- ADz c / f //,f Ij / cn mm ^omaF3o Isc �+ � o y �A -"� z a \ i \ ' w-b l I/ I A p ��" `ter' c Fii= w -• g j po m o _ f� cnj / z3 o =� a. wog p a`o 11 �'"h OD / II 1 i 1 D F £rte 1------\::-•----- �... \ rZ r . \\ \ o� \ ii t X ;1:-!-: !!!! grP 8 ; n z ----v dy/ !i '\ A � ..,m xi i!! ! - - of o� o w /J - / 111 ._._. .. _ Iv st w D a? c-A1I - �. N =4o I n1 I 4?r, vw E -.. / BLamaa - —o N N o -- O \ :::::::•:::;::. a _� �o-rl- , - ipill, ` w N O / 97” ---_J // ro 8 1 A m.in - r gb I ''1 > m A'(! • _.-%/ m `� 1--- -% AN-1 I) / N N m o 1:;: $.:. Le a. <t S .`I v I P ii i 111111:!!!!!::::$:::::: :::: Z Ir m I °' . . _7 ,� I5 m I y 1.!I � 1.3 L ROW N -rn �m 9 c I ' g m O 0 �� Iii c� T, h-. w o ! I I ._..._. --.._._ m y _ m m N III�I , p a yl :' LOT LINE Iia F p D _ — — — — ]- ii I - 0 (31VNad)1k3M lan001S311 _�\ z x I N 20'MIN. cn r-, I O m I !LI L PRINCIPAL m z _ LP SO R a W. UE SETBACK A v N 1 r a .' • 1 (25'MIN.0 D G - V I p [] PRESERVE) m NO A N ° M ! Z 2p fff NGS II _ a og N c gm f my I '\ -( F OZ • D•� ❑ LOT UNE __.. H �� O f jZ O Z �7 p- 1 �Z .�0 ao A a _ 5 \`� -- l \ / b m —I O I I I ro ACCESSORY <n —_ Pi > Its' l -sErarcK - _......./ w Q .MIK. 1 ro �_ —../.._ \ D gr, [ J co m m C I ❑ LOT UNE ....I_- ..._ .....p I - mo w -1 7p 11 ' 1 1 II II ( i z '� NI I \ I j� b. 0 �; p _ / D 1 y l z I l<�\�' laLvnroaFistia Lano�"Asan ___ . ai I : m c� �� - - — -—— - - — — � I t (n — - -�, ' I1 I :19,g_`f: LOT LINE i.� - LOT LINE u n^ m s w ':eb U,� 1 2�iLJ N,- �— rn _—(3yVN1ldI CIAl8 S3Ntll3aIH8'lIM- A A C A I 24, I . —i I. I °'`o o y__a '__ _ -cT z'� m y p 1 .. I 1 20'MIN. 10' 10' , 20'MIN. N—--Z 2. -- —- -T(n\ p P 5 PRINCIPALUE I 0 ROW •UE r� L PRINCIPAL //� A A V \0 \�� J O-N r 50'R O.W. UE SETBACK .D _ --I yTgncK b D m N I.f Z r/1 Z 0 I 25'MIN.0 ] (PRESERVE D >,• rn ( 0 r bm m-z p N PRESERVE) • D ) r D \ \!e\ A 31 T i �` z s 5' 1 > `Rz H.. r I. — I1 —I— I MIN. rH srp�z \\a mR c I III z_ , /.;/ �1 30 i__ 11..-99? p: Io \',Qs, < A m / I..: ❑ LOT ONE '' . T ( 0 LOT LINE 1 N y 0.i.s.\ o I rr L �_ $N1 ' I a I r oN N A o I • m I {40 h m 10'MIN. Z I L] 10'MIN. qT$tt r �-y m�m3w Z 15 SETBACK 0 m (- N -SETBACK�- v1 /� 9 "295- . P MIN. • r .. 1 JIM—n' O y LA "A hIl Zil— II 0 LOT LINE 1 —. I ❑ LOT LINE !—in .i •° 3' m MI I I I U1 ---- n.) - A I:I i� I I ► . 1 I I G:\ENGINEERING\PROD-ENG\W\WCIPME\010WGS\SUBMmALTYPE\PPL\WCIPME-PPL d101NG 3/1/2017 012 PM ne[cc ago[/rV�•. I�aa`"•�oVmm�\aVx]-ram\[+nn]uxJ\'o .t 1 1 G F ' k N ]- 1 W , .,, z t� �a ISN �6s + o_ cJ 41, m S a Sr{'[�i, ~ LU MI co u V W is ;s T‘'.If•••*`• ‘' '''1 ,..A.r 1,141%-, -.444"' '---"ift -7 - •.**,,Nilst a � rta K *•fit lingo I' (1 1 -- ,as i I , Ft ,; 1 _ h iu .1 I O \ -- i I r,+;`gam ,« ,. 9 - I i EL♦[,° I. _L---,:..2== e" " " ro.xt,N" aNp 4 9�5�''a`9' drr r dls31.a,w r�,,,�.s, .�,,,,�dti .z w itri —1011' >p .1:-.' we ' I \ jSrjjjZsjZzj 2Sj \ s y sR .Z ::::44' 1.1"...-i . if _ a K R `,; ".:414t,' x _ a -----=',___--- --7--: --_.:1- -Ja F m sl; E $104 y.. y O J# _h 3;�l:s.t ti:s <,� 14b4 ' ', 4'4.= I �)tCCo '''i11::''''' t-' i I 11 NN • y .{},�.,} +.. III t ~ �g .3. 1'" ,�,g,. A. ,*7.1". it1;� ], 4,`"'::i t F .y ti.,,, rk[r �~ `^ M:r;* to ,,,,'�`�s,« .. •'#' Ate ' , v"t fits° It q" �k $ 4`' • A4**«s, "'* "ry, '/s�• ^ .Y 1."'ZIt''-..4-'".1',."':\ ♦ [Ft",.. j t. IONS 6•WAIN LINK FENCE r+ • 8 J N:4 •I'+-tea,r• i # t• 4,,, '''s.' ,►�, t':r.'„s' 'ft <` i = ,J{ t \„.. • . .i'1-1.-,"' mok t' i lS w�' ; I f'7,-. -. x. ....,,,,,,,, ,---21.,...::s.74.- --,..-.%.,-,, ,,,,>1:0..y . yG '1 . .`'''1*r - i : fi ,i� , s £ 14 r.*'-.-''' 1k3 ,rfi �?s fis -✓4 h, • g *r �. Cr-*,... . , ''"'...'' *tt.s.‘t- "OW ' ' / ft •1 t tr ..,.:Tio., • t itt f v� =a 0w 4.. I► M LN► _LSK, :era iilk-7 ~ 4. 44. ' a. OV02!NOlS°JNIAII , ti . f Cl) f, 2 g < 01 a.) It .. .1 -v ,46, -,,,, 1 z c , 1$‘11 t ''it" •' ..i. v- i • - .,. 'l vik - %... -_, ' N sPI tt - " ,,NI,Ng 1 L d ,6 >a A 11. ,-- . ., • — .,....,!_ -c, ... co • CN1 -,... - 4,,,,,,,,, Z.,.• 1 Cr ' -1-4orr iln, 11 I • - 11 1 i I i'l 4 1 L-- ''' 5 _.... _ • cw a) ,H,..0 • . .... • , ...... 4. 1740- „ . :,, , , .. . ....rc A"'. -1,•1,,,I,,..4, .-., ....... ,"..- -.1k , -',,..A... ;4:-i i i".•,..t.,, ' -• . ..• I8 A . '''7.tk Z* -;LiAtia-.4N-, • - , — . • ca.. „ 41 v..,....-- ,,.t.,..„ ...„ . .. 0 0 _ -- - - i ' 4 ' , AI ''.'• Saw. ..,A 0 .,„,„ ,,,),.. jtkir /1r .,'"'" -Ilk lig:: ' Illiyi 'A-1 ',..• d N 0 )II '4,0 ..., - I ,, 1 ' •,, (...____, 1 I ? - - 1 •- co Iry _ 0_ 71-. • -. , ,. . , t , ... = -1-1••• --- : : • .-, ..„, all •- CI It-- A .' . .\• 1 .11111, k Mk I • 1 C 0 • " i . . II —z—s ,w Yb 1,,,,, hi gR $�'S@#Epp% a I_ EErg 'f g§ yx ���a Pie,; i4 gg. en R t.v°a § li a Eip4 i t g4 g IRe g1, y4 :. - - P "; 4 pb 1p ra ' U Iii 1 kYv = 1 1 yy1N1 aN] ,\:.::. � Ll SII gNI ��� b 1I 'rl � pkB z�'p � 1 Y 35� be p N .i 1 --/ _ .gu U . -. jolg 1. j.,g, ° kg .04. €P.ai� r at %l ay. ------------'— _ 1 �, ...., --T .@g@g! @g@g g gRi! @ qg !I!!!!!1!1!!1!,51.11-2!g11! I!! 5!s! A sb 26811!?' l _ _ _ x a I. '<.... ..,-,-.17 ,77,-.±...._ ,,-,_--z-_--2.,,---)la 1; ''�./i s $ 2! I lly.�I - _ 1. _.._I e t i a 4 61 ill,b ■1 yr W 6 _ b I- 1141: `_.___ 83 3 Es �b� ! B , g Q 1 i a `... n 6 1 IE e.e. s it 13023P P. Hip o �' iold ilid „ Pt- ' ,^I` i1, 811$y 1 ggg 111 1 , W- p r Igo g� .�! 1 g i w NI ;���� d b - � WI Nj 0 3 [@3 1 ¢a§ 9 1 1 9! gI Ni NNI rig'pik ao, m oR ,�� -' '' € r�,�:�%_� y eae tl kg 'a wggF gak ®lg8 4Gz ¢gP g Mg l' ���� ea�wumw�rl.Rn.l�. - si.11! b !1 5 a 56 1.i9 ,1 di a& a1 ll hill is 3s a$ gin u ff /It: ii Y ,I - _ - d. — + � I -:,:::,::::7:,,,,,,::::,:,,,,,,::: �! I ' IIIJ1 I; R ;1.III _ __ .. N 1 I R '41 IrI l!l i j r� 11111 �1� l II' r__ s 11 s r' �p 1 a o I ,c s 6 R I I / •:;_______ JCC, .-f-Y 1I1If e L - F v tlI1 . (:r/ 4'- r2 ( / c”- Via 7.1 . 5 ; 1j< - g e La 3 @n 1 I $ i hii �� ,c, f 555 d © it 1 p di' gyp 1 iil P IP; : / t # Ii aI` 5 la Wi 3133 EP il 7if tt .;c � � s_�1 I I g / /� . 16j/` ,. #/ fi e i ' r: / 7 3 1331 i:ill-21 s; f N,Fj # `} i 4:i1 ! s ?Di iii:l53 Eli ill j /4/j C a /, I J €g / „ .. . j iC:3kett:tt (,r�, , :, ,k 1 ! .,..„, 1 41 Q ailbagi a T i I O J _gym P' MEQ.a«as a ..., ":-±- scr I 13s d 7,..77..Q.,,_,..±%-_-7,12.'i_. rw _-__N-___-. X waa>.eelo®Y I� \ i: = 1 1 G ® - W 2 F 8 </ I ¢ — I a W C Q� I z: e 1= yW� W . W • N r _ _ ._...._._.. _ 1,...._ _ C - y WS n b 0,4a li (/H i .7 I i fllF i :-*—_ _L j a 9 z = 7 `1 p F _____I \� m "` '. si .,..e I o _' i6 Ili 1� Egg `�� ®j\ I :gEe e h I w= .`V i 41 0 4 w ,^ 1_if I & ' lei po CO F rt c4 I:4 4.1 01 1 1 I I p- I a ghi a I / i I / / / oo li i �/ / / 4.1 a / 1-- I <44 z a W o n. W It— 11 (\\ g t — III 2 4i y p„ I 7 —"=.- • L` I N _ • 1 il t I I -1-.-,-,--I /.. 3 �1 z I. WII m o i IIF--' I I I V�- 01� III 1 _ 1 g a o Cpl 1 1 G Draft 6/27/17 c SHERI ROBERTS RE: SERENO GROVE �-' Summary • I am Sheri Roberts; other individuals here have ceded their time to me to speak • Before I begin, would the chair permit me to read into the record my prepared remarks so that I can outline the issues? • I am voicing concerns on behalf of myself, my family and the families of our two neighbors in Wilshire Lakes; we are here to oppose the approval of the plat and construction plan for Sereno Grove, as presented; SHOW ONE PAGE PLAN WITH HOMES HIGHLIGHTED • My husband and I own and reside year-round at 9670 Wilshire Lakes Blvd.; our property abuts the Sereno Grove property on two sides — our back property line to the west and our side yard property line to the north o Our two neighbors own the homes to the south of ours; [the Bankstons' home is the one immediately south] [and the Doyles' home is south of that] o [David and Linda Bankston are here today, too] [as is Larry Doyle] • To be clear, we are not objecting to the land being developed; we are objecting to a portion of the Sereno Grove design — only a small portion of the overall project that will have negative impacts on our properties • The proposed design is not consistent or compatible with our existing homes, and will hurt our property values • It will cause us to bear disproportionate negative impacts from this design in excess of those borne by any other homeowners within Sereno Grove or the surrounding communities • There is a viable design alternative that would mitigate the impacts to us while retaining for the Developer the same number of lots with equivalent lot areas o Relatively cost neutral to the Developer 1 Draft 6/27/17 Concerns 1 1 G • WCI/Lennar has chosen to run their access road all the way from Livingston Road approx. 1/2 mile east to within 10 feet of our back property lines, then curve the road north and again east, effectively surrounding my backyard o This portion of their access road is unreasonable on its face • To put the plan in context, please see the overall depiction of Sereno Grove and the surrounding properties; SHOW PLAN IN CONTEXT; this shows that out of all of the available space, they chose a location for the road that will cause us the most harm [and we are the only abutting homeowners to this project] • As submitted to the Commissioners for approval, the plans have no wall to insulate negative impacts and the 10' strip does not provide adequate separation for the buffer that is nothing more than a hedge and trees spaced 25 feet apart • This design will negatively impact our use of our homes and our property values o Our home, being surrounded on three sides by roadway, will be less desirable — to us and to future buyers of our home — due to impact on our quiet enjoyment of our yard o the acreage surrounding our home was a significant factor in our decision to purchase it • Future residents of Sereno Grove can factor the position of the roadway into their decision; by imposing this road position on us, we will bear the cost without having that choice • Design also raises concerns of: o (1 ) safety, since there will be no significant barrier separating our backyard from vehicles on the road, o (2) water runoff from such a significant amount of roadway which will exacerbate the water issues that are experienced during the rainy season," D°51e.s o (3) noise from cars, trucks, motorcycles and individuals using the road, o (4) light from headlights and streetlights disrupting our use and enjoyment of our home, and o (5) privacy concerns. 2 Draft 6/27/17 1 1 G • Like many homes in the area, our homes open to the back with a lanai area that is used much like a family room, and surrounding open area for other uses (such as a play area for our families) • In WCI's own words "A backyard is a sanctuary for renewal" — quote from the wall of the Southwest Florida International Airport on March 18, 2017. Look what they want to do to my sanctuary. • Allowing this design will set a dangerous precedent that will encourage developers to run their roadways, and push other less desirable aspects of their developments, to the perimeter, so that existing homeowners bear the burdens; this design is a serious safety and property value concern • Standards were administratively reduced by staff throughout this process, including: Normal 15 foot Type B buffer reduced to 10 feet [LDC Sec. 4.06.02 Type B Buffer = 15'] ■ [Landscape buffering and screening standards within any PUD shall conform to the minimum buffering and screening standards of the zoning district to which it most closely resembles. LDC 4.06.02(C)(1 )] • [Developments of 15 acres or more...shall provide a perimeter landscape buffer of at least 20 feet in width 0,44\ o regardless of the[ight-of-way. LDC 4.06.02(C)(4)] '+-kz o The requirement to have a standby generator for the wastewater pump located near the NW corner of my home was waived • Our understanding: generally the County allows developers to forego a standby generator only when the wastewater pumping station is operated by the county, which has the resources to address issues that may arise in the event of a pump station failure. o Water management retention areas are permitted within a buffer but they are not permitted to exceed 50% of the square footage of any required side yard landscape buffer. A minimum 5-foot wide 10:1 level planting area is required to be maintained where trees and hedges are required. [LDC 4.06.02(D)(1 ) and (2)] 3 Draft 6/27/17 • The retention area to the north of my home does not comply with this. o The berms that exist around our homes do not have flat tops to 1 1 G allow for proper stability and planting o Other deviations also needed to be approved to make the Developer's plans work Alternative Plan o Through our attorney we hired an engineer, Chris Hagan from Hagan Engineering, who redesigned the portion of the roadway around our homes; Mr. Hagan is here today and is proffered as an expert in land development planning, site design & engineering; SHOW ALTERNATIVE PLAN; I will also provide a key to the markings for the record o Moves the curve of the access roadway to the west, away from our backyards o Includes an 8' high wall on top of a perimeter berm with landscaping o Limits the two lots to the west of our backyards to one story height o WOULD FOREGO: changes to the roadway and sewer lift station to the north, and would accept a wall there o This plan is not really the way we would like to see Sereno Grove developed but we tried very hard to identify a design that would address enough of our concerns while minimizing impacts to Developer o We provided this Alternative to WCI in January; they have had ample opportunity to address the issues, but have chosen not to do so Lack of Compatibility and Consistency • Land Development Code ("LDC"): Requires that development within a PUD be compatible with established uses of surrounding neighborhoods, and that the development process in the county be equitable in terms of consistency with established regulations and procedures and respect for the rights of property owners 4 1 1 G Draft 6/27/17 • LDC also states that it is in the best public interest for all property and development to be designed and used in accordance with good planning and design practices o "Development within a PUD district shall be compatible with established or planned uses of surrounding neighborhoods and property. [LDC Section 4.07.02(B)(1 ).] o "The PUD shall provide... protection of the surrounding area from potentially adverse influences generated by or within the PUD. [LDC Section 4.07.02(B)(2).] o Stated intent: the development process in Collier County be "...equitable, in terms of consistency with established regulations and procedures, respect for the rights of property owners, and consideration of the interests of the citizens of Collier County." [Section 1 .05.01(B) of the LDC.] o By terms of LDC: the BOCC determined that it is in the "best public interest for all property and development to be conceived, designed, built, and used in accordance with good planning and design practices... ." [Section 1 .05.01(C) of the LDC.] o [Code of Laws & Ordinances ("Code"): "The public health, safety, morals and general welfare require the harmonious, orderly, and progressive development of land within the state." [Code Section 250-71(a).] o [Code: intent is to secure the "efficient, adequate and economic supply of utilities and services to new land developments." Code Section 250-71(c)(2). Another of the stated intents of the Code is to secure the "provision of appropriate... utility sites in new land developments." Code Section 250-71 (c)(6). • Use of the Wilshire Lakes stub-outs would be the most cost-effective, efficient and appropriate location and alignment to provide the necessary water and sewer connections for Sereno Grove.] 5 Draft 6/27/17 • The design of Sereno Grove is inconsistent because it reflects a 1 1 G blatant disregard for the right to quiet enjoyment of existing homeowners, and the design is incompatible because it does not mitigate the negative impacts of immediately adjacent roadways. • Because it violates the LDC, it should not be approved as presented. Developer's Arguments • Developer would like us to believe that the questions of compatibility and consistency are limited to the zoning decision o Not true under the LDC o Cannot be true because at the zoning hearing the Planning Commission at most has only a master concept plan, not the plat and construction plan to evaluate design impacts o In fact, if this is true, Developer appears to have been deceptive at the zoning hearing: according to County records, the concept plan shown to the Planning Commission contained only 55 lots when they were requesting approval for 64 — and 64 is what is currently indicated on their plan o By showing 14% fewer lots than were intended, they made it appear as though there would be more significant buffers than was actually intended o The LDC requires that the design of the project is considered; the most appropriate time is at this meeting, when the plat and construction plan are considered for approval Developer's Tactics • Our two neighbors and I met with GradyMinor on January 9 and voiced our concerns • Since then, we have been trying to address this as best we can, given the hand we've been dealt and WCI/Lennar's unwillingness to engage on this issue o Barry Ernst of WCI [Director of Planning & Permitting] advised me that he would contact us to set up a meeting in January; instead, they filed new plans ignoring our concerns the day before their supposed internal meeting o We were told in April that we could arrange a meeting with Rhonda Brewer of Lennar [VP of Community Development]; on 6 Draft 6/27/17 April 19 I provided her with availability; again, no contact but 1 1 6 they revised their plans to file an ICP to again ignore us • Clear that their unwillingness to address our concerns has nothing to do with either the cost or the time necessary to re-work their plans o On February 1 GradyMinor contacted our HOA for county utility easements (CUEs) to use the WL water and sewer stub-outs as they planned o Our HOA President agreed to meet with them, only asking that we homeowners attend so that all issues could be addressed; they canceled the meeting o Rather than consider our concerns, WCI/Lennar wasted months developing a new plan moving the water and sewer tie-ins thousands of feet westward to Livingston Road for which, according to their own engineer's opinion, the probable additional construction cost alone will be approx. $290,000 o For less cost, they could have used the Alternative Plan, and could have been able to obtain approval of their PPL on May 9th, when originally scheduled o In the time taken to file their ICP, they could have revised their design to use our Alternative Plan for the roadway and additional buffering but chose not to • Then, in the 11th hour last week, after their ICP application was approved by county staff, Lennar called me, indicating that they wanted to have a meeting by the end of the week o Bankstons and I (along with Chris Hagan) met with Russ Smith, Lennar's Director of Land Development, and Wayne Arnold from GradyMinor, on Friday afternoon o It appeared to me to simply be further effort to distract us from our need to prepare for this hearing, and to allow them to tell you they met and sought to address our concerns o Mr. Smith advised that Lennar would not engage with us earlier when, in his words, they thought that we "had a gun to their head" because of the CUE issue o Ridiculous since we have tried to take a very reasonable approach from day 1 , even anticipating the impact to their costs and timing 7 Draft 6/27/17 o His statement confirmed that their approach was an intentional 1 1 G one in which they chose to stonewall us while they forced through their ICP in order to get on the agenda today • Mr. Smith stated that Lennar understood our need for a better buffer and that they could provide us with a wall and limit the two lots closest to ours to one-story homes, but that they would not move the small section of the roadway because it is now too late in the process o But they created the timing issue by the approach that they chose • The wall and one-story homes alone don't solve the problems stemming from the road [including valuation, quiet enjoyment] • It appears that this last minute discussion was their attempt to make us feel as if we had no option given the timing of this Board meeting • They should not be allowed to benefit from using these strong-arm tactics on homeowners; since the beginning, we have only asked for a reasonable solution o The county cannot leave individual homeowners to fend for themselves in the face of a Developer's significant financial and other resources o We have incurred significant costs to protect our property rights, and are seeking the Board's support Closing: ➢ WE ARE NOT SAYING "DON'T DEVELOP THIS LAND." WE ARE SAYING "DON'T DEVELOP THIS LAND IN A WAY THAT HURTS US." WE ARE SIMPLY TRYING TO MITIGATE THE NEGATIVE IMPACTS TO US. ➢ WE HAVE LEGITIMATE CONCERNS ABOUT THE DESIGN PROPOSED AND HOPE THAT THE BOARD HELPS US BY: ➢ VOTING "NO" ON THE SERENO GROVE PPL PROPOSED TODAY FOR APPROVAL. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME. o [BY REQUIRING THAT SERENO GROVE BE COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING LAND USE, AND THAT THE DEVELOPMENT PROCESS BE EQUITABLE WITH RESPECT FOR THE RIGHTS OF PROPERTY OWNERS] 8 Xi Z C W c0 11f - cci CD o CD 0 co 0 C2. r a ninCIDce- V su = n TI — ar ✓ mK m rpr CD a = K — Oc0m C 3 0 Wm m . T = 2 m F, __, -1 KO0 0 zv> m c"'i� mpc1" Z • o ZZ � -4 O -0 m0 � 0 Ga -1 ,,, m s � zg 1 (,� m OD m - D (e - V ' D zm m Ozz T r- 0 m c5 > 0 m0O p jj -z< Z o CO Z pT . T Z = -<< Z.7-3 CD --1 G) 7o C = 0 O). T MC M � � cn .-nccn iti -o Q -1 0 -61 m -1 › g to c m% = O =i mWmo0 imemi5. crFm m �, M n -< - oq -{ 3 O � . C m0W o -1 � � �0 00oco � = pp DC27o _ cno 0 0Pz . o m tz co� Z �'b' O = W Z mziv r m ,T) co —I o -IQ r- o =- OO a xiK5, m O � Z o -� a m nI * m Coo I W 7) cmmn D o OT. -o am Dom M m O mm va i 1;1 (1) a r.,, T:0 (n m p * p ODm . wr rn r = Xi F:3 --I op O 2 nmm m mm = Z < z U) 0WD -1 M m0 -I r m m Z = 0 \ a Oz mm0 _ 00 . Zn55 T r < O _ ▪ m = cr7.) m m z -1 cn 0 -< z = 0 a 73 Z CD11) C 1 1 G "CS 3 2. `° cn CO -o O o co _ CD 0 R 0 1- ::'o = m ▪ = K r 0 com C n Dorn m 0 � _ O .` 3 n zvi MI cC- FdS — .J O O mz D Omz M cno —I izz < `. 1- -02 O 3oa0 r o M m -I --I 2 20 --- -1 c7Di� m = - Z — O d z Fo O z D zrn m ozz Cgs' -7 'TI0 -00 IT1 -IZm + xj 00 v � jjz z =Z - w 4- 2 ziC0 Q CD -1 = 0 w ; rn 0m I's. nDD CLo w+ = O = m ci r- � m = Ocmnp o -1 TpT -G = zo � -o O 3 O = = C m (7 d 0 -I Cf) = co r- = 0o > oDo L y - m u) o O o � Z O E. � c m = cern A n O = c Zm mzm 0 z � Z mz a * rn D zoo r cn r- z 3:1, m0o O rt <b I m � HT1 � pN ED. (vo, f- -p y.. m D p ? .. IT � m O cmm mo no m � Q Z F' cn c1) rn p � p Ohm Z 'CI r- = XJ � -► cn ▪ D mm Pfl m m —I < z u) o T. t7 = L7 O > 7or Fr, mm Z 11pr , a �Oz r m - p ,A -G - � m = 0c � '� 5 O z = Go a 21 D) � n liG -0 a a CO 0) CO CD CD ks.C gI U) Cy �._.. 1' o _ � 'V i E _ D mo m ro r .--F I— m r 0' r CD • � K 0 W m C , C') com KT . 0 C,* m n -z- =-1 Ko0 v 0 Zv) m ccnnmcc O O mz 0 oma - � p c, m0 U"_ m rn _1 O� X26 —1 mz Z � G) z m Zm m 02z T D D m cn > o J 0 v r_ 6 -- r O OA -Dn Z = -W< w ; : 0oC = Zw a CD —I —1 rTi O_ r` o= Q M 03K0D -• —1 Om m � D M, cn = D —1 x 71 Do < K Cl) a *ay ra _ � O A2m � ci mcn -+ mZ 0 M � r- , -c-I) `� 0 CD —I0 -0 O mZo'o _ea 3 co > m - "'I= OCoC � Z St 0I- CoOoo-0TZ > coz F-- -T.1 M m--I - m _ z-i ,_O Z m I, 'n pW Kn -I -I � I OOOo J = > D3 T 0 Z Kz ; � + ( /-' V-�ZZm - • ) � z O Coo M rk, cn r- -in Fri� o O� ° m D 0 \n m D Amo 0 CD m 33 \ 0mi > mac \ U) o * CO o � 5o („ n 1 _ xp >, m mO m mm --1 z < Z � 0 0mp D 1 -.1 m G) (A m o --1 C) _ 0 O r m m z -±,0 r mD 0 z r_00 mmOr VV -G � m Z cc7, ah 33 m Z -1 % �- cn O -< 2 Z 1? a) � a 1 1 G -a 3 m CD cn CD -1:1 o c as= om � =1.:--1 n n 11 _ o rn r _ a W K o Wm G vozc, v R ■ CD 'o Oz r- 13mo . m --- rri m o ;\ — m z z xi m G) D 1+ G J0 m m mzz -n ro m c5 > m O -0 --1,_ m _< z Om CO 03 70 r- o = m * W o CO z m Z = -W< c lei 0 = C = Z W Q T CD -4 O = c m 0 G. c rn = � cn PoCD -v Q y om "n m « jo C a 13) = O � =1m Fi Oro 30m - 0pcno 7 c m r-o „ -< =Zo 3 �D W -° O m W a 3 . � o G W1 -< 4.. rt M m -1 n mzo r .J E O 0z� OO 7o m m �cz 2O 'a � gym .- . ` C� = O0 p Z W o 7 -1 on V) ODC . _ ={ O > W R. --� D zK Z Kmz a * m zoo �_ (/ 1 rcpnn Z �� O 0 m7mo D Wcnp Cn � v' 0 nz ' S::, 0 m p _* 0 00m > mm m w m = Z < z Cl) 0coT. tel -I -ID Cl) v0 � r mm O = r Z -{ o m pZ _< mm jmm . ` MI c < _ -1 o A t,{ ``' -< c ai-1 m -zip v) C) -< M n 1 1 G z 0 -0 a a CO -< r N 2 CD -n 0 W DO � _ °« 0. fit co 0 M Ca r- D z c c3 XJ -4 T1 MOM -0 =00 m 0 ` CD r m r -=-1 0 ;4% N < x O 0 0 Wm g � 2 = m F) . 1 =� � z •• Z M 0 0 m 0 zm ? - ' oo-p -10 c / m � _ _ m DJzo13 ,m Oo � `D z m m c w 00Dro m z vii Oo w W0D 36D 0 -6m - > E m • i,CQ 0 C7 D D3 -10 C p 0. ---I 0 c M Rl ,p (/) m- 0 A 5 w+ H co ria D ZN -m ocnz CD MD O- Vila] Cczro = oo MI Fri O rm' upO � z °m° D ''� m z E C) O z , Ct —. � C m0oCD C) o � ZO2 A _- =1- 0 DCzm 77- D � m co 3 I m70 mz = CD., =. mD o � 0 713 1— m 00 * 0 03 C Z < z Cl) 0 wk, _1 m 0 V) cn "-i r.,. n mm Z 7) D 4 r Z M -° z r F ik aoD -eco � '. I- co -1 = m • 'N � rn 2 = O '• N. Dom mm r cn 0 1- m z = m 0 D m D --( mz 0 xi Z g D h G zo -a 3 a (0 -< I- CD 2 CD o W 7, o 0. W C -_< p c5 . CU r 3::" zc -o = 0 m 0 � LA CD r- m r_ -=1 O n Wm iI - m F .1 =1 Uz s Z 0 mD , zm : zz J 0 cn 0--I � 0 c o WI p M x -zi -I zo -I cn m 2 G) 8 m O p 73 W 6, ^L D zm R1 cG' 0 -0 cJ m z > O 13 DO W 000 > D r- 03 O K 0 =im -- > Kz„ CC O -Dn Z p =-1 p g (D Z z0 Camo n -I 077 --1 0 Q c /= = Oc m = -1w Q a- 0. Ill 77 � u) m - 0 cD n D --I Do TOpp N c 03 mcn Ox> S2 — m T ; -"" Kw0 N N F. 3 -� o OzZN U} r O 0 ' c o o s4 F/3 --I cwn K XI m --1 v S "', mmn > ' ' 0 m - Om � - o Cn ZED +..-13 ga° � p n p O oco Zoook •51 -•I o " W w 0- - Z� V\ m z � Z -0 -zip ,1 m RI D F -Z1 > --1 0 m 0 No° cn rn m 2 n_i 0 Dm —IzcnD 'e Dm D 0 > o � mr m p � p np Mi rm m m O 04 rn Zm 0 WEli - N r mm Z o > L1 r M oz r -- . `� D pD -< =10, r- c p --•I = m -r< rn = = 0 M -I m m 77 1 Cn 0 Xfrit z -C h G2.) )je M G) -.4-- k .) ` oz N \- -1 m z � 7 CD D) 2 n 1 1 G -a 3 =' CCI y `D CD -< CD v M -o O g 0. 07 D cn CO co co 0 = 7D 0 F-.. 1- m � mr. dor --7 CD ,.4 O mz O 5mz C --- 0 s cn O z ----- rn- O o xi m 0 D 1k., e, D m m Ozz -1 r 0 m z m' ` T' 7x0 O ° al � pp a. m c * W tv o M CO Z OT.m Z = mow GmCz CD -I -� mO_w Q =n c m o Emir rn � � r- 0 ' FP W .r 0.- W m0) O xj -Imz p � � O mzw m --I wO 70 03 1---C0 - '1,Oo � ii Z , Er mai rn [-T-1z M 11ooz 'a. �. c O▪ 7 co Z m - o ly (n-71 r_ = 00 � 37Kcoi, rn O ° Z 0 --1 D C 0 * rn 0 zoo % rkL z c M m I 131 cr) D M m m Dpi. ' 1%.r cDn > 0 0m30 30 a prn 33 a m cui3 O Ill O * p OOm TI m =O70 0 = u xi D m Ill cn m = Z < z Cn 0 W D -1 m0 Cn m0 _, C- 0mm rZ 19or- % r oz I- rnOrO W —I TT1 - gy m Z cC c �� 33 m z � (7) n -< 0 n 70 71 Z CD f 92 a 1 1 G -a 3 Et CO � `° ° CD -< 0 = m m u, CO -0 = o m > 0 CD cr)— — — r TDm r 0Oalm C co 3 n6orn _c K -mi = = rn cn -ZI KOc� "� Eli Do 0 - - Z v5 / O rnz zrnz 0 M 0 z _l P J r- O S"o 7p D O L m OZ = m _ > r'-- CI Zrn m 0zz n -,-1 1� -n rD- 0 m cnD0 F- 33 aa0 � 7mo � z + r O Z T Z= -Wo CO G (W a' S -I 0 Do C = Z W O i `v = Oc m m > > 0. o m K u) 0n C/) CD -0 Q -I 0p Er; =ID - o- Ea m � O � � z `r0' e i. -1 CD OT ozm T 3 -0 O O Do . C m0 � -1 w = 000 m oT0 n DJzo (,) E., .... O Tr �rrn � O o0Z _ , o Si 0 -v cV rn =-1 z m \AO 7Dop Z mO8 (A = o 2 0000 > mKvi v ZK v Zoo n * Z C -+ N . cd -13 I8 D -1 Z 0 n r cn O m o = y"', m � = cnp • Mc) a m � v 00X V) -0 m0 = m = � Xi am m v' m = Z < z Ci) cw > r m O F-ijD p r m Z m oz r Koo 33 X) 0 D -< m -n 0 c < -I -InW - � m = c 0( - m --I 7) 0 -< z = O a XI 1 G Ex parte Items - Commissioner Taylor COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA 06/27/17 ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.A. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2011-08,the Addie's Corner Mixed Use Planned Unit Development,to allow 250 multi-family dwelling units or Group Housing/Retirement uses in Tract C as shown on the Master Plan and 75,000 square feet of gross floor area of commercial development and Group Housing/Retirement Community uses in Tract A as shown on the Master Plan; providing for amendment to the Master Plan; by providing for revised development standards; and by providing an effective date. The subject property consists of 23.33+/-acres and is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and Collier Boulevard (CR 951), in Section 22, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida [PL20150001776]. NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM IX SEE FILE ®Meetings ®Correspondence ®e-mails ®Calls MET WITH 12 RESIDENTS OF ESPLANADE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB ON MARCH 30TH AND MET WITH Rich Yovanovich, David Genson, Wayne Arnold ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 21ST OUR OFFICE HAS RECEIVED EMAILS AND CALLS FROM MARCH 2017 UNTIL JUNE 2017 9.B. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code, which includes the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from Planned Unit Development(PUD)to Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)for a project known as the Triad RPUD to allow development of 44 single-family dwelling units. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of Palm Springs Boulevard and Radio Lane in Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 10.75± acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 05-11, as amended by Ordinance No. 05-23,the former Triad Planned Unit Development, and by providing an effective date. [PUD- PL20160002564] NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE ®Meetings nCorrespondence ®e-mails ®Calls Met with Rich Yovanovich, ON THURSDAY,JUNE 22ND AND CATHY GORMAN ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 21ST Emails have been exchanged to set up mtgs and to discuss the subject. 1 1 G 9.E. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2007-46, as amended,the Wolf Creek RPUD,to approve an insubstantial change to the PUD,to add a preserve exhibit that revises the preserve configuration for Parcels 3B and 9 only, and providing for an effective date. The subject property is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately one-half mile west of Collier Boulevard, in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 189±acres. [PDI-PL20160000404] NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE ®Meetings nCorrespondence ®e-mails ®Calls Met with Carrie Abrams and Bev Smith on Monday, June 12, 2017 and met with Bruce Anderson, Cheffy Passidomo on Wednesday, June, 21, 2017 COUNTY MANAGERS REPORT 11.G. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of Sereno Grove, (Application Number PL20160001884) approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the performance security. NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE ®Meetings ['Correspondence ®e-mails ®Calls MET WITH Dave Bankston, Sheri Roberts ON MONDAY, MARCH 20TH AND HAVE HAD PHONES CALLS & Emails BACK AND FORTH SINCE THAT TIME, HAD DISCUSSIONS WITH Rich Yovanovich ON WEDNESDAY, JUNE 21ST CONSENT AGENDA 16.A.2. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of Maple Ridge Amenity Center at Ave Maria, (Application Number PL20170000724) approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the performance security. DX NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE ❑Meetings nCorrespondence e-mails nCalls 1 1 G GrecoSherry From: GrecoSherry Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 2:05 PM To: Leo Ochs Cc: BrockMaryJo • • Subject: FW: Sereno Grove Further Update Serer? O As per your conversation with Commissioner Taylor (see below email) GroVe- 1/4sikerry CJreco Executive Coordinator to Commissioner Penny Taylor, District 4 239-252-8604 Fax 239-252-6393 SherryGreco@colliergov.net From: Sheri Roberts [mailto:roberts.sheri@att.net] Sent: Wednesday,June 21, 2017 1:28 PM To:TaylorPenny<PennyTaylor@colliergov.net> Cc: GrecoSherry<SherryGreco@colliergov.net> Subject:Sereno Grove Further Update Commissioner Taylor, As a follow-up to my June 12, 2017 email to you, yesterday afternoon WCI/Lennar's requested changes to the Sereno Grove plat and construction plans ("PPL") were approved through the "insubstantial change" process (application #20170001891), despite the significance of the changes. Under Sec. 250-58 of the Code of Laws we should have 30 days from the June 20, 2017 decision to file an appeal. We advised county staff that we intend to do so. Despite this, county staff (Matt McLean) advised us that the PPL will be on the agenda to be considered by the Board of County Commissioners next Tuesday, June 27, 2017, essentially shortening our 30-day appeal period on the ICP to less than one week. We have advised Mr. McLean that we feel that scheduling the PPL for next Tuesday is premature and potentially prejudices our due process rights. However, we have received no indication that he intends to change it. Can you ask the staff why they would not continue the PPL until after the BCC, as the Board of Zoning Appeals, considers the ICP appeal? If the decision to approve the ICP is overturned, the PPL is not ready for consideration by the BCC. In the past week, I also learned additional information about the redesign of the wastewater and water distribution systems that was proposed and permitted to be accomplished as an "insubstantial change." WCI/Lennar now plans to run the water and sewer connections all the way from Livingston Road which is approximately 1/4 mile west of their western property line (not counting the access road), rather than use the Wilshire Lakes stub-outs that are approximately 12.5 feet to the east, as originally planned. The changes also include: (1) using an unlooped water system which can result in poor water quality, (2) a very long distance between the water connection and the further points in Sereno Grove which will likely result in poor water pressure, (3) a privately-managed sanitary sewer system that includes an extremely long force main and low flow, and (4) the removal of the requirement for a standby generator for the wastewater pumping station, which removes any protection against failure. According to the updated opinion of WCI/Lennar's own 1 1 1 G raengineer, as filed with the county, the probable additional construction cost for the proposed changes have been increased and will be approximately $290,000, which does not seem to include engineering, permitting or filing fees or the additional costs of ongoing maintenance of the wastewater facilities. All of this was approved as an "insubstantial change." If you have any uesti ns r would like to schedule a call or a meeting to further discuss these developments, please I(bt w� Kind re ds, Sheri Roberts rod he i att.r e lieV( j 6100.9) 2 1 1 G GrecoSherry From: Sheri Roberts <roberts.sheri@att.net> Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2017 8:32 AM To: TaylorPenny • Subject: Sereno Grove at Pelican Marsh Attachments: Ltr to Commissioner Taylor 2.7.17.pdf;Attachment 1 - Sereno Grove Plan 1.11.17.pdf; Attachment 2 - Sereno Grove Alternative Plan 1.23.17.pdf;Attachment 3 - Key to Markings on Sereno Grove Alternative Plan 1.23.17.pdf; Attachment 4 - Sereno Grove Plan in Context 1.11.17.pdf Commissioner Taylor: My neighbors and I would like to raise with you our concerns regarding the "Sereno Grove at Pelican Marsh" development in Naples. Please see the attached letter and the attachments referenced in that letter. We would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you to discuss. Thank you for your consideration. Kind regards, Sheri Roberts Roberts.sheri@att.net Mobile: (248) 630-5194 1 Attachment 3 Key to Markings on Sereno Grove Alternative Plan 1. The proposed internal roadway and lot line relocations are shown in heavy black lines. 2. The sewer lift station previously located on the north side of the internal roadway to the southwest of Lot 61 is now on the south side of the roadway, so as to have the lift station be located on the west end of Dry Detention#3 where shown;that is labelled and depicted in black. 3. That lift station relocation allowed this portion of the roadway itself to be moved northward slightly by—15+' on the western end to^'10' on the eastern end of that curved roadway section shown again in heavy black lines,to allow further separation from the northern or side yard of the Roberts' lot. 4. The blue lines reflect the location and cross-sections we believe would mitigate the impacts as best as possible with the 10'of landscaping to be located on the east side of the eight (8') foot high wall for relocated lots 13 &47 as shown in Cross-Sections A-A, with the wall on the top of the perimeter berm. 5. The same color lines and 8'wall height are shown on top of the perimeter berm as depicted for Cross-section B-B to the north of the Roberts' home. 6. The dwelling units to be located on lots 13 and 47 are sought to be limited to one story height for their habitable space; and 7. The red lines generally reflect the existing facilities as presently proposed for the location of the internal roadways and lot lines,for perspective. 1 1 G i C v . il z —3 d V 7 K� H a Kir �. a . I 9 4 l-, .. Q y .-7 t 1 i .n. � Qi • w e 44D h • I —� tluY�k 111 ) I. - )I r R I ' I F a IT _LJ '1' 'I r'::411E1Illti7.°1111.1110.111 c r�„ ____ V z ; i .--'‘.-;--—-—v -. .- -f1-7-H, \\. iiill r ii \ tt __, ' Hit , ! (I 1: i,,n_i_:'1 11 'q! _ a ... ,t;,._ 1,ii' W g ri--- ---,. O I 1 �;'�, II I I to �1 i I -- i.,\ 1 7 VI I 1 1 +p / l I c r-4. y s *_ / 1I — z L ,,,, I¢ °4 i1 `I ' t1, 0 1 1 1 I a 1 (I I i F.:7:-,1. a- / P a� . . . . , , . . ,tt.- ,— -- -- j 3 - P, a 9 I -.t . . .1. , . - ' i� 1 I I I @ I $1a ���r7 ( it I1 ..;;T C-J 1 I 1 1 G GrecoSherry From: Sheri Roberts <roberts.sheri@att.net> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 7:56 AM To: TaylorPenny Cc: GrecoSherry Subject: Sereno Grove Update Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Commissioner Taylor, Once again, I would like to thank you for taking the time to meet with me, my neighbor and the representative of our Wilshire Lakes Homeowners Association ("HOA") on March 20, 2017. Unfortunately, since that date things have not improved with respect to the development known as Sereno Grove at Pelican Marsh. WCI/Lennar continues to refuse to speak to us and now they are seeking approval of changes to their plat and construction plans for Sereno Grove ("PPL") through a process termed an insubstantial change ("ICP"), in order to avoid ever needing to do so (application #20170001891). However, the changes they propose are not "insubstantial;" they involve a complete re-work of the wastewater and water distribution facilities for the PPL. In mid-April, we were advised that management of WCI/Lennar would meet with us to discuss our concerns, and we were asked to contact Rhonda Brewer, their VP of Community Development, to set up a meeting. I called and spoke to Ms. Brewer on April 19, 2017, and provided her with my availability: three full days and one half-day from April 25 through May 2. She thanked me for being so flexible, but then never contacted me to arrange a meeting. Instead, WCI/Lennar was working behind the scenes to reconfigure their PPL, a revised version of which was filed with the county on May 24 along with their request for an ICP. As a reminder and by way of background with respect to the ICP, in February WCI/Lennar's agent contacted our HOA President to discuss WCI/Lennar's need for easements to tie into the Wilshire Lakes stub-outs for water and sewer, since no such easements exist. Use of the Wilshire Lakes stub-outs was assumed in WCI/Lennar's initial plans as it would be the most cost-effective location and alignment to provide the necessary water and sewer connections for Sereno Grove. Our HOA President advised the representative that she wanted to include me and my neighbors in the discussion so that we could resolve all issues at the same time. Initially, they agreed and a meeting was set for February 13. However, on or about February 3 when WCI/Lennar's counsel advised ours that WCI "did not see any benefit to discussing" our request to address the location of the roadway in their plan, WCI/Lennar's agent canceled that February 13 meeting. In connection with their current application for an ICP, WCI/Lennar has significantly reconfigured their plan, spending time and money to do so, to avoid speaking to our HOA about those stub-outs and, therefore, avoiding the need to address the positioning of their roadway so close to my home and the homes of my neighbors. In their revised PPL, they intend to move the utility connection locations to Livingston Road, which would result in a connection that is approximately 1/4 mile west of their westernmost property line, rather than use the Wilshire Lakes stub-outs which are located approximately 10 feet east of their easternmost property line. They then argue that, because of the time required to obtain the necessary permits to do this, it would create a "considerable economic hardship to the developer" and they propose that the wastewater facilities will now be privately owned and maintained. They claim that this self-imposed hardship entitles them to obtain approval for these changes through the ICP process. It is obvious that their unwillingness to address the positioning of their roadway so close to our homes has nothing to do with either the cost of doing so or the time necessary to re-work their plans. The alternative plan created by our engineer (who we hired and paid) was provided to WCI/Lennar in January; the changes 1 1 1 G included in that plan would be relatively cost neutral to WCI/Lennar and would also retain the same number of lots of equivalent size. Rather than consider that configuration, WCI/Lennar has wasted time developing a new plan moving the water and sewer tie-ins for which, according to their own engineer's opinion, the probable additional construction cost will be over $210,000 (which does not seem to include permitting, filing or engineering fees). For less cost, they could have used our engineer's plan and been in a position to obtain approval of their PPL at the May 9 Board of County Commissioners ("BOCC") meeting, as originally scheduled. They chose not to do so, but are now requesting an abeyance from legal requirements in order to obtain approval for their significantly revised plan. WCI/Lennar has made it clear that they are more interested in spending their time and money pushing for approval for a PPL that is inconsistent and incompatible with the surrounding land uses, than make any attempt to recognize the rights of existing homeowners. Under their proposed PPL, myself and my neighbors will be forced to bear disproportionate negative impacts from the WCI/Lennar development in excess of those borne by any other homeowners within Sereno Grove or the surrounding communities. This is a blatant disregard for the property interests of existing homeowners. At this point, the ICP application has not yet been approved; it is currently in a resubmittal phase according to the county website. Last week John Houldsworth advised me that the PPL is tentatively on the BOCC schedule for June 27. Thank you for taking the time to review this and remain engaged on this issue. If you have any questions or would like to schedule a call or a meeting to further discuss these developments, please let me know. Kind regards, Sheri Roberts roberts.sheri(a�att.net Mobile: (248) 630-5194 2 1 1 G GrecoSherry Subject: WCI Sereno Grove - Dave Bankston, Sheri Roberts Location: bcc conf rm Start: Mon 3/20/2017 10:00 AM End: Mon 3/20/2017 10:30 AM Recurrence: (none) Organizer: TaylorPenny 4-5 people Sereno Grove at Pelican Marsh 1 Ex parte Items - Commissioner Fiala 11C COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA June 27, 2017 ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.A. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be ' held on this item,all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2011-08,the Addie's Corner Mixed Use Planned Unit Development,to allow 250 multi-family dwelling units or Group Housing/Retirement uses in Tract C as shown on the Master Plan and 75,000 square feet of gross floor area of commercial development and Group Housing/Retirement Community uses in Tract A as shown on the Master Plan; providing for amendment to the Master Plan; by providing for revised development standards;and by providing an effective date.The subject property consists of 23.33+/-acres and is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road (CR 846)and Collier Boulevard(CR 951),in Section 22,Township 48 South, Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida [P120150001776]. NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM Fl SEE FILE ®Meetings ®Correspondence ®e-mails ❑Calls Met wl Sam Miller and other homeowners from Esplanade Golf& Country Club, JMeeting wl Hearing Examiner, Staff Report 9.9. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.Should a hearing be held on this item,all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code,which includes the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area181 fleur de lis lane of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from Planned Unit Development(PUD)to Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)for a project known as the Triad RPUD,to allow development of 44 single- family dwelling units.The subject property is located on the northeast corner of Palm Springs Boulevard and Radio Lane in Section 34,Township 49 South, Range 26 East,Collier County, Florida,consisting of 10.75± acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance No.05-11,as amended by Ordinance No.05-23,the former Triad Planned Unit Development, and by providing an effective date. [PUD-PL20160002564] NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM VI SEE FILE ®Meetings ®Correspondence ®e-mails (Calls Meeting w/ Chris Hagen, Correspondence and Phone call w/ Cathy Gorman, Meeting w/ Hearing Examiner, Site visit and Staff Report ADVE TISED PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) 1 G 9.C. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.Should a hearing be held on this item,all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an amending Ordinance Number 04-41,as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code, which includes the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD),to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD)for a project known as the MAC RPUD to allow development of 44 single-family dwelling units.The subject property is located on the northwest corner of Palm Springs Boulevard and Radio Lane in Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida,consisting of 10.76±acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 05-50,the former MAC Residential Planned Unit Development,and by providing an effective date. [PUD-PL20160002565] NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM Fq SEE FILE ®Meetings ®Correspondence ®e-mails ❑Calls Meeting w/ Chris Hagen, Correspondence and Phone call w/ Cathy Gorman, Meeting wl Hearing Examiner, Site visit and Staff Report 9.D. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.Should a hearing be held on this item,all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 04-41,as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code,which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from an Estates(E)zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD) zoning district for the project to be known as the County Barn Road RPUD,to allow construction of a maximum of 268 multi-family residential dwelling units or 156 single family residential dwelling units or any combination of dwelling unit types permitted in the PUD, not to exceed a trip cap of 157 p.m. peak hour two- way trips.The subject property is located on the east side of County Barn Road,approximately one quarter mile south of Davis Boulevard in Section 8,Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 38.59±acres;and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-P120160001398]. NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM M SEE FILE ®Meetings nCorrespondence se-mails ®Calls Meeting w/ Chris Hagen, Meeting w/ Bruce Anderson, Hearing Examiner, spoke w/ Karen Homiak, emails re: Street Lighting, Staff Report ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS (continued) 1 1 G 9.E. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.Should a hearing be \'''I held on this item,all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No.2007-46,as amended,the Wolf Creek RPUD,to approve an insubstantial change to the PUD,to add a preserve exhibit that revises the preserve configuration for Parcels 3B and 9 only,and providing for an effective date.The subject property is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately one-half mile west of Collier Boulevard, in Section 34,Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida,consisting of 189±acres. [PDI-PL20160000404] NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM VI SEE FILE ®Meetings ®Correspondence ®e-mails ®Calls Meeting wl Bruce Anderson, Correspondence & Phone call w/ residents of Black Bear Ridge. email COUNTY MANAGER'S REPORT 11.G. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of sereno Grove,(Application Number P120160001884)approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the performance security. (Matt McLean, Director,Development Review Division) NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE Meetings ®Correspondence ®e-mails nCalls Mail & Emails from residents of Wilshire Lakes Community, Discussions w/ Planning Commissioners CONSENT AGENDA 16.A.2. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members.Should a hearing be held on this item,all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of Maple Ridge Amenity Center at Ave Maria, (Application Number P120170000724) approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the performance security. Ak NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE ['Meetings (Correspondence De-mails ❑Calls 1 1 G , 1/ BrownleeMichael 9 \ From: Sheri Roberts[roberts.sheri@att.net] Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2017 8:38 AM To: FialaDonna Subject: Sereno Grove at Pelican Marsh Attachments: Ltr to Commissioner Fiala 2.7.17.pdf; Attachment 1 -Sereno Grove Plan 1.11.17.pdf; Attachment 2-Sereno Grove Alternative Plan 1.23.17.pdf; Attachment 3-Key to Markings on Sereno Grove Alternative Plan 1.23.17.pdf; Attachment 4-Sereno Grove Plan in Context 1.11.17.pdf Categories: ATTENTION, PRINTED Commissioner Fiala: My neighbors and I would like to raise with you our concerns regarding the "Sereno Grove at Pelican Marsh" development in Naples. Please see the attached letter and the attachments referenced in that letter. We would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you to discuss. Thank you for your consideration. Kind regards, Sheri Roberts l� Roberts.sheri@att.net / CG "_ , am Mobile: (248) 630-5194 C � �' biki i/ / a 0 ` / `r / 1 r ill/ i #' . . 0 /- jt143 14CAr:4/1/%'*---t/t? y IAI a ru4,7" Q vrt.i.A., -/ tO2 ? Cke r i NrIetV 9 Ail v ` tAr ' 9., ,),, 1 1 1 G February 7,2017 BY USPS AND EMAIL Commissioner Donna Fiala Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3299 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 303 Naples,FL 34112 DonnaFiala@colliergov.net RE:Disproportionate Adverse Impacts of WCI Sereno Grove Site Plan on our Homes in Wilshire Lakes,Naples To: Honorable Collier County Commissioner Donna Fiala From: David and Linda Bankston—9664 Wilshire Lakes Blvd,Naples,FL 34109 Jim and Sheri Roberts—9670 Wilshire Lakes Blvd,Naples,FL 34109 Larry and Jessica Doyle—9660 Wilshire Lakes Blvd,Naples,FL 34109 Dear Commissioner Fiala: The purpose of this letter is to make you aware of information about the WCI Sereno Grove PUD that will cause our homes to absorb more impacts of the WCI development than any other homeowners in either Sereno Grove or Wilshire Lakes. We have tried to address this directly with WCI and even hired an engineering firm to develop an alternate plan that would address our concerns. However,after a great deal of delay,we were advised on Friday,February 3,2017, that WCI will not discuss this with us. Therefore, we are asking for your help in resolving this matter before it is too late. We all own homes in Wilshire Lakes that directly abut the proposed Sereno Grove,Naples, development.The first attachment depicts the current Sereno Grove construction plan;our properties are highlighted in yellow for your reference. As you can see, WCI has chosen to run their access road from Livingston Road all the way east to within 10 feet of our back property lines,then curve the road north and again east,effectively surrounding the Roberts home at 9670 Wilshire Lakes Blvd. The wall that was proposed earlier in the process to provide separation has been removed from this plan,and the normally 15 foot buffer has itself been reduced to only 10 feet. The buffer will be nothing other than a hedge and trees spaced 25 feet apart. Our homes, much like others,are designed to be open to the back each with a lanai area that is used much like a family room. We will be denied this use and enjoyment of our property if the development proceeds as planned. 1 1 1 G Further,there is a viable alternative for the design of the development that would mitigate the impacts to our properties. This was first discussed with Grady Minor, WCI's agent for this development, on January 9,2017,and then further refined in the following weeks. The second • attachment reflects that alternate plan(the third attachment is a key to the markings). This redesign keeps the same number of lots with equivalent lot areas,and should be relatively cost neutral to construct. We presented this refined alternative plan to WCI on January 23,2017 and, as indicated above,were advised on Friday that they will not even consider it. This blatant disregard for the property interests of existing homeowners is detrimental to the economic development of this area. If homeowners lose confidence that their property rights have any protection,the desire to purchase property in this area will suffer. In the course of addressing this issue,we have also identified flaws in the process that are equally detrimental to preserving homeowner property rights and,therefore,to economic development. There has been a lack of proper notice of this development in more than one respect. Two of the homeowners, including 9670 Wilshire Lakes Blvd.which is most impacted by the proposed roads,were not provided with notice of the September 2016 meeting at which the PUD was approved. The two homes that didn't receive notice are families who moved to Wilshire Lakes for positions with companies that recently relocated to the area. We only learned about the WCI development plans when a separate notice to vacate an easement in the area to be developed was received before the December holidays by one of us. After multiple objections to that easement vacation were filed with the county,including by the Wilshire Lakes Homeowners Association(the"HOA"),the HOA was advised last week by Marcus Berman that WCI has withdrawn its request to vacate the easement. We find it curious that after objections are filed, WCI has now simply withdrawn the request to vacate,denying us the public hearing that would otherwise be required. In addition,there has been some amount of misdirection relating to WCI's intended site plan in notices of the meetings held. At the time of the PUD approval,the board was provided in the official"notice"with a drawing of the proposed development that showed a green space adjacent to our properties. This was consistent with how other adjacent developments were treated— specifically the Marsala PUD received a generous preserve area around all of their adjacent lots. However,as indicated above and on the attachment we are providing to you with this,the document provided to the board and in the notice is not in fact how the developer intends to proceed.WCI's actual plan is not within the spirit or intent of the original approval,nor is it in keeping with notice provisions of the land development code.And most of all, it is not a good land planning solution. Below please find two images reflecting this change.We own the three northerly homes in the orange circle. 2 1 1 G .t, 07"'x.. b t ! I +r }{ > i I t Oyxe4 ' d i 1 3 VS. a I . islik, 4:i°' i. DRAWING# 1 - SERENO AT NAPLES PUD/PELICAN MARSH PRESENTED AT SEPTEMBER 13 COUNTY COMMISSION MEETING. [NORTH IS TO THE LEFT-HAND SIDE] 3 1 1 G a i (Jr' I i si '�. X4,1 ,` 'l {`' , 14 V It *1 pli ..- ' i : tilIcle ill - __.. , vi UlJj ' i Y 1 1 : s v DRAWING#2-SERENO AT NAPLES PUD/PELICAN MARSH CURRENT PLAN j The second issue observed in these two drawings is that Drawing#2(Current Plan)includes four additional lots not previously shown when presented to you,the commission,for approval. j Drawing#2 further encroaches on our back yards with the very minimal Type B border described above. Drawings#1 and#2 create a very small border with hardly any separation for the corner home at 9670 Wilshire Lakes Blvd. Water runoff from roads,traffic,noise and headlights will be on three sides of the house. We are the only homes affected so drastically by the WCI Sereno Grove plan,as you can see on the fourth attachment. Everyone else in our current community and the new community has a preserve or lake view. The planned road extends directly into our back and side yards. Our property values will plummet. Water runoff from so much roadway will exacerbate the water issues that we already have during the rainy season. Further,with the road noise,headlights from vehicles,lack of privacy and diminished view,we will be prevented from enjoying the property we purchased. In addition,our local wildlife,which includes threatened species,will also suffer. We were trying to be constructive by contacting with the developer in an attempt to resolve the issue with an alternative site plan,but WCI has been delaying their response to us while at the same time pressing ahead despite the concerns we have raised. We,of course,are also willing to work with Collier County staff. Since it now seems that an amicable resolution cannot be achieved,we need to consider our legal remedies.It is our feeling that no property owner should be placed in a position of having to spend significant funds on representation to achieve what should be common sense solutions that have been afforded to all other homeowners in the area. 4 1 1 G Thank you for your attention to this matter. We and our HOA look forward to your support and assistance. Sincerely, dre ` pp* t 1 � • • 5 . 1 1G _u _ ,. „: -7- — . c.,.. ill i; Ir. .. r----li., iti ill! liti 0.. ° . ....I i .. V ...i 'I ,j ti. ,v u Iii . r-- , , r______....r, ... ._, , , „ 1 i 11_ , , .. .: .4, ..-......,- II . : , 1 I.IL74 a "I.." III . -Tw- r.l. -1 . ..3"...--, -Thisi••-all•coay••• ')°''''''i .i" -- A ' '' ' ....i.„.__.,--------TA--1—' .,„ 1 3t....-tA7, . "'^ =-. N— 11 lit R li „I/ 7.--------;;7,,,u--T1-0-._ , ,•1^----'..s.,,1 '1 a _ I ii`i I .I; I* il i i I 611.511M11 k,1 1 U 11 _1 • ,1,3 ; , _44 fqi,,,,,, ---,„\ I 1: 141 itiviliet f- iii ,1 I : , H 2 ct; 11 'I') 1'',101 ?,. 3 .I A 3 1 . _ 1 , • ,1 I . E4 A vi , IF: . L11 1 , '' " ' 1 , ) 1, )A ....., g i 4 - I 1 1 a I 'II& 1; . , i 1 : I 4 i <11511_1111 7 ' 11 .,,-) , i . 1 , I I mo-IIIIY - iiii . • ..... . i .41 "•', •••,-....• u, IA . i g • -71 .............,.......,..:.,,, ri:i::,:::ir.ii,;,i**i.i.i ,•,: 104 -, - ..iim:wil,,iiiiiiii.oiii;i;li.,r:m ; ;i.0;;;: ;: f • ;.;•0 . t il 11111121 11,. iiTIgYiiil iiiiilliiiiiii':ii. :1 :,E,:;i;:;:::;i;i;,:i:::i;i:E;i:::,,,i,•:::.::: :.: : 7 ; !ill 11"411117 ::.!:i'.::*iii:i:;! *iti*:::: ***'1:::!:i: ;II ' II/ 11 i id.•al :111,1,1,11 ii•:iii1;::ii::', iiiiiiiii ii':;'.ill'i ,:•:",1 I i 31 1 1 will 1 V•if, ""....—..--:,•: ;:...,i...i:... .. il III „1 :v...., ....... \.a 1 i ,:'..' ."..*':qiiiiii:;iiiiiiiii il 31. • il I;I:lii lIte,:::::::::,: . i 111-4 ......,... ....••.. r)-.) ,:i,:! ; .: ::::1 . • r 1 itillip ii!II r ''''''...:"..1:•;':'. ilaa410.UN I :•ji.:::,11 ;':.i; ';'.,Iill'i':i'L:i.iiitiMiii::iiiiiinii.'.11 , siod - - --"Ir . a 11 A ' .-..„„ _ Y.;iiiii)s. - jot--- '....4...,i.J.li _ 1, a / .-.:,,,,- ---- g-Wril'' lg'W'-' '''--1 ''''' ,,,:::::::%"; V ,..--• 3:1 a - ,a -..- ON 7 . ,. i.k.' bI --2...::'•-1... ‘....' t.''..- gig.' "''' ‘ ii I 2 I it 0 22 hf W. 02 t i III \ „ci iv/ ,.....I i .............: i.,,,..„. , ti iiii ' ',k; ("1..1---;'' A ,II ....7. 1 ., , .Ns„....„4.^-' • ii I i , iiiii,„.1,!I., i mini:120111 , r , , //11.. \ i..., . .. . ...... ,.._. i ,; ..-:.:,,-,- i• ; 1 a IV ..iv I , i i i 111;11""111111:1 'I '11 ii{vigl 661 idl l'illigliili 11 ' I !Pir i 21 •,(.%,,:.". .- , ....2,..... Iimi.,1H JH blot.: hi; / I ,../g;* \. \, ,..91!:".:::::::-. ' 11 ....,,,,....e......„...../ • /' :INS:NNIIIS111:11:1MIMS ,7 11'. r# ,1 , !k•- ,,, , ..,,," % A i • ,.,7, *.• • ,, 1 ‘ 213013111111R18000EggOIN '1MM ../ ii ,• ss i 9E1120:01SIONNIINOMIEMO:Rg.ttOgal. t ' ., ss i I : ENESIIIN:14111111:0111 . , ,, , „ /./.4.* " , i i !I . MES00000009000Ega201120M9g2 ,,, I-, 11 s .s .?,- i , , ',,,••\ ci 44%'41..,7- -I , §L14110010101INCICCOME:CCCCO.111 i Ii /. — , i( i 1oli II i .i " : . . .111, 11111, ..,-.‘„i;,• / 1 r•I iA- ,--- . v1,1_ \ I 1 i f ii if; i / ''),,:. • IA 4z., ..gs...„-' V i. I 11; 5ti 111111 I Ilili 'N, '''""' I,..... ,,, ........ . .. . 2 I P • a•1 1 !4 11 3g/JAI. 4 .11 ("•/ 1, ,.. I. ., ,......, \, . . . , i .%**--- -,*',2\vc 6 -.-.• . .....--- - --- ---'r-1,r v,!•:::,,,,...1.,,,_,.i ,i. VP • ‘4:;.,•.:,.•:'.1.-:-.1 -•$-, - ......'. ..,-,.. . .,, ' c--:_'...:::: '..,' • ' .__,.. . . .. 4, h1G N.._ • ,. • .,._\ \\ i_ ue '[ .. P • i 1 y: Q ( % 4 - a { w a x • i t ' g; : Jill- _ _ -- �aD ;_ . _ - , � �� s ..1_ - - ,-; \ 1 f 1 1 < z \ i 1 r : _ i - - -, i vili � z°i $ ! ‘am- In,_ � m /��y4C4s{\ 9� a - .4 f a `J='1 t 4 ® �� R \ II f • nig 1. �� �� ■ �� � NII® . . , : ,, v zz e --- --- 511 - i a 1 a 4 l` L r { I 04 ! 1 ,1 1 J J1 lc; o u tg a 1 � oh1-1 } I I ; 1 �i , ti SiSI f i :... I. II I _ ! gil - . / L. - . . � i 1 1 1 71 1 `- p 7 LL i !! / . 1 1 G BrownleeMichael From: Sheri Roberts [roberts.sheri@att.net] Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2017 3:54 PM To: FialaDonna Cc: BrownleeMichael Subject: Update on Sereno Grove Attachments: Exhibit A June Sereno Grove Plan.pdf Categories: PRINTED Commissioner Fiala, In follow-up to our February 7, 2017 communication sent on behalf of us and our neighbors, I would like to update you on events that have occurred with respect to the development known as Sereno Grove at Pelican Marsh ("Sereno Grove"), particularly since the plat and construction plans for Sereno Grove ("PPL") are scheduled to be heard by the Board of County Commissioners ("BOCC") next Tuesday, June 27, 2017. As a reminder, the access road for Sereno Grove is planned to extend eastward from Livingston Road for approximately 1/2 mile to within 10 feet of our back property line, then curve north and east, effectively surrounding our home at 9670 Wilshire Lakes Blvd., Naples. The current plan is attached as Exhibit A (our home and those of our two neighbors are highlighted in yellow). On January 9, 2017, we raised concerns with WCI/Lennar's agent regarding the placement of this portion of the roadway, to no effect. In February, WCI/Lennar's agent contacted our Wilshire Lakes Homeowners Association ("HOA") to discuss WCI/Lennar's need for easements to tie into the Wilshire Lakes stub-outs for water and sewer, since no such easements exist. Use of the Wilshire Lakes stub-outs was assumed in WCI/Lennar's initial plans as it would be the most cost- effective location and alignment to provide the water and sewer connections for Sereno Grove. Our HOA President advised the representative that she wanted to include us and our neighbors in the discussion so that we could address all issues at the same time. Initially, they agreed and a meeting was set for February 13. However, on or about February 3, when WCI/Lennar's counsel advised ours that WCI "did not see any benefit to discussing" our request to address the location of a portion of the roadway in their plan, WCI/Lennar's agent canceled that February 13 meeting. In mid-April, we were advised that management of WCI/Lennar would meet with us to discuss our concerns, and we were asked to contact Rhonda Brewer, their VP of Community Development, to set up a meeting. We called and spoke to Ms. Brewer on April 19, 2017, and provided her with our availability: three full days and one half-day from April 25 through May 2. She thanked me for being so flexible, but then did not contact me to arrange a meeting. Instead, WCI/Lennar was working behind the scenes to reconfigure their PPL, a revised version of which was filed with the county on May 24. That filing was made in connection with a process termed an insubstantial change to plans ("ICP"), in which WCI/Lennar sought approval of changes to the PPL in order to avoid addressing our concerns (application #20170001891). Despite their use of the ICP process, the changes are not"insubstantial;" they involve a complete re-work of the wastewater and water distribution facilities for the PPL. To provide further detail, WCI/Lennar now plans to run the water and sewer connections all the way from Livingston Road which is approximately 1/4 mile west of their western property line (not counting the access road), rather than use the Wilshire Lakes stub-outs that are approximately 12.5 feet to the east, as originally planned. According to the opinion of WCI/Lennar's own engineer, as filed with the county, the probable additional construction cost for the proposed changes will be approximately $290,000, which does not seem to include engineering, permitting or filing fees or the additional costs of ongoing maintenance of the wastewater facilities. Not only do the new plans increase WCI/Lennar's costs unnecessarily, but the proposed changes result in an inferior and inefficient design which, in certain respects, raises public health and safety concerns. The changes include (1) using an unlooped water system which can result in poor water quality, (2) a very long distance between the water connection and the further points in Sereno Grove which will likely result in poor water pressure, (3) a privately-managed sanitary sewer system that includes an extremely long force main and low flow, and (4) the removal of the requirement for a standby generator for the wastewater pumping station, which removes any protection against failure. In its ICP filing, WCI/Lennar further claimed that its private ownership and maintenance of the wastewater facilities is necessary because the legal requirements it must otherwise meet will create a "considerable economic hardship" on them. If there is any"hardship," it is a hardship that they created by their unwillingness to work with us. Despite all of this, the county staff approved their ICP request on June 20, 2017. It is obvious that their unwillingness to address the positioning of a portion of their roadway so close to our home and the homes of our neighbors has nothing to do with either the cost of doing so or the time necessary to re-work their plans. The alternative plan created by our engineer(who we hired and paid) was provided to WCI/Lennar in January; the changes included in that plan would be relatively cost neutral and WCI/Lennar would retain the same number of lots of equivalent size. Rather than consider that configuration, WCI/Lennar has wasted time developing a new plan involving a costly move of the water and sewer tie-ins. For less cost, they could have used our engineer's plan and been in a position to obtain approval of their PPL at the May 9 Board of County Commissioners ("BOCC") meeting, as originally scheduled. They 1 1 1 G chose not to do so, but instead sought, and received, an abeyance from legal requirements in order to obtain approval for their significantly revised plan. Under Sec. 250-58 of the Code of Laws we have 30 days from the June 20, 2017 decision to file an appeal. We advised county staff that we intend to do so. Despite this, county staff advised us that they have scheduled the PPL to be considered by the BOCC next Tuesday, June 27, 2017, essentially shortening our 30-day appeal period to less than one week. WCI/Lennar has made it clear that they are more interested in spending their time and money pushing for approval for a PPL that is inconsistent and incompatible with the surrounding land uses, than make any attempt to recognize the rights of existing homeowners. Under their proposed PPL, we and our neighbors will be forced to bear disproportionate negative impacts from the WCI/Lennar development in excess of those borne by any other homeowners within Sereno Grove or the surrounding communities. This is a blatant disregard for the property interests of existing homeowners. Thank you for your time in reviewing this email. If you have any questions or would like to schedule a call or a meeting to discuss these developments, please let us know. Kind regards, Sheri and James Roberts roberts.sheri a(�att.net Mobile: (248) 630-5194 2 - - Saunders 1 G Ex parte Items - Commissioner Burt Sau COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA 06/27/17 ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.A. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2011-08,the -4ddie's Corner Mixed Use Planned Unit Development,to allow 250 multi-family dwelling units or Group Housing/Retirement uses in Tract C as shown on the Master Plan and 75,000 square feet of gross floor area of commercial development and Group Housing/Retirement Community uses in Tract A as shown on the Master Plan; providing for amendment to the Master Plan; by providing for revised development standards; and by providing an effective date. The subject property consists of 23.33+/-acres and is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road (CR 846) and Collier Boulevard (CR 951), in Section 22,Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida [PL20150001776]. SEE FILE ®Meetings ®Correspondence ®e-mails flCalls Numerous letters and emails (51); Meeting with Rich Yovanovich, Wayne Arnold and David Jensen; May 22nd Town Hall Meeting — Numerous attendees spoke about project(85 attendees) 9.B. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code,which includes the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from Planned Unit Development(PUD)to Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)for a project known as the Triad RPM to allow development of 44 single-family dwelling units. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of Palm Springs Boulevard and Radio Lane in Section 34,Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 10.75± acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 05-11, as amended by Ordinance No. 05-23,the former Triad Planned Unit Development, and by providing an effective date. [PUD- PL20160002564] SEE FILE ®Meetings flCorrespondence se-mails I !Calls Meeting with Rich Yovanovich and Wayne Everett; Emails from Douglas Lewis and Scott Lepore Numerous emails (21); lid Neighborhood Petition from 128 Black Bear Ridge Residents; Meetings with Terrie Abrams, various Board Members of Black Bear Ridge, Steve Bracci; Meetings with George Vuko and Bruce Anderson COUNTY MANAGERS REPORT 11.G. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of Sereno Grove,(Application Number PL20160001884) approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the performance security. SEE FILE nMeetings ! !Correspondence se-mails I !Calls Emails from Sheri Roberts CONSENT AGENDA 16.A.2. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation too approve for recording the final pa�tof of thMaple e stand'agd forme enity Center at Ave Construction and Maintenance Number PL20170000724) app Agreement and approval of the amount of the performance security. NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE ! !Meetings !Correspondence Fie-mails fCalls 16.A.3. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the minor final plat of Oyster Harbor at Fiddler's Creek Phase 1 -Replat 3, Application Number PL20170000332. SEE FILE ®Meetings [Correspondence ne-mails [Calls Meeting with Anthony Pires, Terry Cole and Valerie Lord 16.A.4. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of Esplanade Golf and Country Club of Naples Phase 4, Parcel "L", (Application Number PL20170001594) approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the performance security. X NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM I I SEE FILE [Meetings fCorrespondence [ le-mails I iCalls 1 1 G LykinsDave From: Sheri Roberts <roberts.sheri@att.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 1:29 PM To: SaundersBurt Cc: LykinsDave Subject: Further Sereno Grove Update Commissioner Saunders, As a follow-up to my June 12, 2017 email to you, yesterday afternoon WCI/Lennar's requested changes to the Sereno Grove plat and construction plans ("PPL") were approved through the "insubstantial change" process (application #20170001891), despite the significance of the changes. Under Sec. 250-58 of the Code of Laws we should have 30 days from the June 20, 2017 decision to file an appeal. We advised county staff that we intend to do so. Despite this, county staff (Matt McLean) advised us that the PPL will be on the agenda to be considered by the Board of County Commissioners next Tuesday, June 27, 2017, essentially shortening our 30-day appeal period on the ICP to less than one week. We have advised Mr. McLean that we feel that scheduling the PPL for next Tuesday is premature and potentially prejudices our due process rights. However, we have received no indication that he intends to change it. Can you ask the staff why they would not continue the PPL until after the BCC, as the Board of Zoning Appeals, considers the ICP appeal? If the decision to approve the ICP is overturned, the PPL is not ready for consideration by the BCC. In the past week, I also learned additional information about the redesign of the wastewater and water distribution systems that was proposed and permitted to be accomplished as an "insubstantial change." WCI/Lennar now plans to run the water and sewer connections all the way from Livingston Road which is approximately 1/4 mile west of their western property line (not counting the access road), rather than use the Wilshire Lakes stub-outs that are approximately 12.5 feet to the east, as originally planned. The changes also include: (1) using an unlooped water system which can result in poor water quality, (2) a very long distance between the water connection and the further points in Sereno Grove which will likely result in poor water pressure, (3) a privately-managed sanitary sewer system that includes an extremely long force main and low flow, and (4) the removal of the requirement for a standby generator for the wastewater pumping station, which removes any protection against failure. According to the updated opinion of WCI/Lennar's own engineer, as filed with the county, the probable additional construction cost for the proposed changes have been increased and will be approximately $290,000, which does not seem to include engineering, permitting or filing fees or the additional costs of ongoing maintenance of the wastewater facilities. All of this was approved as an "insubstantial change." If you have any questions or would like to schedule a call or a meeting to further discuss these developments, please let me know. Kind regards, Sheri Roberts roberts.sheric att.net Mobile: (248) 630-5194 1 1 1 G LykinsDave From: Sheri Roberts <roberts.sheri@att.net> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 8:02 AM To: SaundersBurt Cc: LykinsDave Subject: Sereno Grove Update Commissioner Saunders, Once again, I would like to thank you for taking the time to meet with me, my attorney Patrick White and my neighbors on February 27, 2017. Unfortunately, since that date things have not improved with respect to the development known as Sereno Grove at Pelican Marsh. As you had instructed, we advised WCI/Lennar that we had spoken to a county commissioner who was not willing to approve their plat and construction plans for Sereno Grove ("PPL") in their current configuration, and that the alternative plan developed by our engineer was considered to be reasonable. Despite that, WCI/Lennar continues to refuse to speak to us and now they are seeking approval of changes to the PPL through a process termed an insubstantial change ("ICP"), in order to avoid ever needing to do so (application #20170001891). However, the changes they propose are not "insubstantial;" they involve a complete re-work of the wastewater and water distribution facilities for the PPL. In mid-April, we were advised that management of WCI/Lennar would meet with us to discuss our concerns, and we were asked to contact Rhonda Brewer, their VP of Community Development to set up a meeting. I called and spoke to Ms. Brewer on April 19, 2017, and provided her with my availability: three full days and one half-day from April 25 through May 2. She thanked me for being so flexible, but then never contacted me to arrange a meeting. Instead, WCI/Lennar was working behind the scenes to reconfigure their PPL, a revised version of which was filed with the county on May 24 along with their request for an ICP. As a reminder and by way of background with respect to the ICP, in February WCI/Lennar's agent contacted the President of our Wilshire Lakes Homeowners Association ("HOA") to discuss WCI/Lennar's need for easements to tie into the Wilshire Lakes stub-outs for water and sewer, since no such easements exist. Use of the Wilshire Lakes stub-outs was assumed in WCI/Lennar's initial plans as it would be the most cost-effective location and alignment to provide the necessary water and sewer connections for Sereno Grove. Our HOA President advised the representative that she wanted to include me and my neighbors in the discussion so that we could resolve all issues at the same time. Initially, they agreed and a meeting was set for February 13. However, on or about February 3 when WCI/Lennar's counsel advised ours that WCI "did not see any benefit to discussing" our request to address the location of the roadway in their plan, WCI/Lennar's agent canceled that February 13 meeting. In connection with their current application for an ICP, WCI/Lennar has significantly reconfigured their plan, spending time and money to do so, to avoid speaking to our HOA about those stub-outs and, therefore, avoiding the need to address the positioning of their roadway so close to my home and the homes of my neighbors. In their revised PPL, they intend to move the utility connection locations to Livingston Road, which would result in a connection that is approximately 1/4 mile west of their westernmost property line, rather than use the Wilshire Lakes stub-outs which are located approximately 10 feet east of their easternmost property line. They then argue that, because of the time required to obtain the necessary permits to do this, it would create a "considerable economic hardship to the developer" and they propose that the wastewater facilities will now be privately owned and maintained. They claim that this self-imposed hardship entitles them to obtain approval for these changes through the ICP process. It is obvious that their unwillingness to address the positioning of their roadway so close to our homes has nothing to do with either the cost of doing so or the time necessary to re-work their plans. The alternative plan created by our engineer (who we hired and paid) was provided to WCI/Lennar in January; the changes 1 116 included in that plan would be relatively cost neutral to WCI/Lennar and would also retain the same number of lots of equivalent size. Rather than consider that configuration, WCI/Lennar has wasted time developing a new plan moving the water and sewer tie-ins for which, according to their own engineer's opinion, the probable additional construction cost will be over$210,000 (which does not seem to include permitting, filing or engineering fees, or ongoing costs of maintaining the wastewater facilities). For less cost, they could have used our engineer's plan and been in a position to obtain approval of their PPL at the May 9 Board of County Commissioners ("BOCC") meeting, as originally scheduled. They chose not to do so, but are now requesting an abeyance from legal requirements in order to obtain approval for their significantly revised plan. WCI/Lennar has made it clear that they are more interested in spending their time and money pushing for approval for a PPL that is inconsistent and incompatible with the surrounding land uses, than make any attempt to recognize the rights of existing homeowners. Under their proposed PPL, myself and my neighbors will be forced to bear disproportionate negative impacts from the WCI/Lennar development in excess of those borne by any other homeowners within Sereno Grove or the surrounding communities. This is a blatant disregard for the property interests of existing homeowners. At this point, the ICP application has not yet been approved; it is currently in a resubmittal phase according to the county website. Last week John Houldsworth advised me that the PPL is tentatively on the BOCC schedule for June 27. Thank you for taking the time to review this and remain engaged on this issue. If you have any questions or would like to schedule a call or a meeting to further discuss these developments, please let me know. Kind regards, Sheri Roberts roberts.sheri(a att.net Mobile: (248) 630-5194 2 Ex parte Items - Commissioner McDaniel 1 1 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA 06/27/17 ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 9.A. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2011-08,the ddie's t ssc+, E ,to allow 250 multi-family dwelling units or Group Housing/Retirement uses in Tract C as shown on the Master Plan and 75,000 square feet of gross floor area of commercial development and Group Housing/Retirement Community uses in Tract A as shown on the Master Plan; providing for amendment to the Master Plan; by providing for revised development standards; and by providing an effective date. The subject property consists of 23.33+/-acres and is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Immokalee Road (CR 846)and Collier Boulevard (CR 951), in Section 22,Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida [PL20150001776]. NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM DX SEE FILE ®Meetings I (Correspondence ®e-mails (Calls Met with Rich Yovanovich, Wayne Arnold, David Genson 9.B. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code,which includes the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from Planned Unit Development(PUD)to Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)for a project known as the to allow development of 44 single-family dwelling units. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of Palm Springs Boulevard and Radio Lane in Section 34,Township 49 South,Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida,consisting of 10.75± acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 05-11,as amended by Ordinance No. 05-23,the former Triad Planned Unit Development, and by providing an effective date. [PUD- PL20160002564] NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM X SEE FILE ®Meetings flCorrespondence ®e-mails _Calls Met with Rich Yovanovich, Wayne Arnold, David Genson 1 1 G g.C. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 04-41, as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code,which includes the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)to Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD)for a project known as the Ri to allow development of 44 single-family dwelling units. The subject property is located on the northwest corner of Palm Springs Boulevard and Radio Lane in Section 34,Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida,consisting of 10.76±acres; providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 05-50,the former MAC Residential Planned Unit Development,and by providing an effective date. [PUD- PL20160002565] NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM E SEE FILE ®Meetings I ICorrespondence Ze-mails ICalls Met with Rich Yovanovich, Wayne Arnold, David Genson 9.D. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance Number 2004-41,as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code,which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from an Estates (E)zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)zoning district for the project to be known as the .,ounty Barn Roa ,to allow construction of a maximum of 268 multi-family residential dwelling units or 156 single family residential dwelling units or any combination of dwelling unit types permitted in the PUD, not to exceed a trip cap of 157 p.m. peak hour two-way trips. The subject property is located on the east side of County Barn Road, approximately one quarter mile south of Davis Boulevard in Section 8,Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 38.59± acres; and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20160001398]. NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM V SEE FILE ®Meetings (Correspondence Ze-mails I !Calls Met with Bruce Anderson 9.E. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a 4 hearing be held on this item,all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No.2007-46,as amended,the fi ,to approve an insubstantial change to the PUD,to add a preserve exhibit that revises the preserve configuration for Parcels 3B and 9 only, and providing for an effective date.The subject property is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road,approximately one-half mile west of Collier Boulevard, in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 189±acres. [PDI-PL201600004041 NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE ®Meetings ECorrespondence Ze-mails I (Calls Met with Bruce Anderson, Terrie Abrams and Bev Smith COUNTY MANAGERS REPORT 11.G. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat of '3rofi ,(Application Number PL20160001884) approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the performance security. NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM }X SEE FILE ®Meetings [ Correspondence ®e-mails ( (Calls Met with Rich Yovanovich, Wayne Arnold, David Genson and Sheri Roberts CONSENT AGENDA 16.A.2. This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve for recording the final plat , (Application Number PL20170000724) approval of the standard form Construction and Maintenance Agreement and approval of the amount of the performance security. X NO DISCLOSURE FOR THIS ITEM SEE FILE nMeetings nCorrespondence I le-mails Calls 11G FilsonSue Subject: Rich Yo ,.• __ A • ne Arnold and David Genson regarding Addies Corner and MAC an Sereno Grove Location: BC ��6f • -e- Start: Tue 6/20/2017 2:30 PM End: Tue 6/20/2017 3:30 PM Recurrence: (none) Organizer: McDanielBill >2:30 for DR Horton: Hadley Place (MAC Triad) - 1/2 hour > 3:00 for Barron Collier: Addies Corner- 1/2 hour > Dianna Quintanilla > Legal Assistant to Richard D.Yovanovich, Esq. >Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. >4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 > Naples, Florida 34103 > (239)435-3535 >(239)435-1218 (f) 1 1 1 G FilsonSue From: Sheri Roberts <roberts.sheri@att.net> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 1:36 PM To: McDanielBill Cc: FilsonSue Subject: Further Sereno Grove Update Commissioner McDaniel, As a follow-up to my June 12, 2017 email to you, yesterday afternoon WCI/Lennar's requested changes to the Sereno Grove plat and construction plans ("PPL") were approved through the "insubstantial change" process (application #20170001891), despite the significance of the changes. Under Sec. 250-58 of the Code of Laws we should have 30 days from the June 20, 2017 decision to file an appeal. We advised county staff that we intend to do so. Despite this, county staff (Matt McLean) advised us that the PPL will be on the agenda to be considered by the Board of County Commissioners next Tuesday, June 27, 2017, essentially shortening our 30-day appeal period on the ICP to less than one week. We have advised Mr. McLean that we feel that scheduling the PPL for next Tuesday is premature and potentially prejudices our due process rights. However, we have received no indication that he intends to change it. Can you ask the staff why they would not continue the PPL until after the BCC, as the Board of Zoning Appeals, considers the ICP appeal? If the decision to approve the ICP is overturned, the PPL is not ready for consideration by the BCC. In the past week, I also learned additional information about the redesign of the wastewater and water distribution systems that was proposed and permitted to be accomplished as an "insubstantial change." WCI/Lennar now plans to run the water and sewer connections all the way from Livingston Road which is approximately 1/4 mile west of their western property line (not counting the access road), rather than use the Wilshire Lakes stub-outs that are approximately 12.5 feet to the east, as originally planned. The changes also include: (1) using an unlooped water system which can result in poor water quality, (2) a very long distance between the water connection and the further points in Sereno Grove which will likely result in poor water pressure, (3) a privately-managed sanitary sewer system that includes an extremely long force main and low flow, and (4) the removal of the requirement for a standby generator for the wastewater pumping station, which removes any protection against failure. According to the updated opinion of WCI/Lennar's own engineer, as filed with the county, the probable additional construction cost for the proposed changes have been increased and will be approximately $290,000, which does not seem to include engineering, permitting or filing fees or the additional costs of ongoing maintenance of the wastewater facilities. All of this was approved as an "insubstantial change." If you have any questions or would like to schedule a call or a meeting to further discuss these developments, please let me know. Kind regards, Sheri Roberts roberts.sheriaatt.net Mobile: (248) 630-5194 I. 1 G FilsonSue Subject: Rich Yovanovich, Wayne Arnold and David Genson regarding Addies Corner and MAC and Sereno Grove Location: BCC Office Start: Tue 6/20/2017 2:30 PM End: Tue 6/20/2017 3:30 PM Recurrence: (none) Organizer: McDanielBill >2:30 for DR Horton: Hadley Place (MAC Triad)- 1/2 hour >3:00 for Barron Collier: Addies Corner- 1/2 hour > > Dianna Quintanilla > Legal Assistant to Richard D.Yovanovich, Esq. >Coleman Yovanovich & Koester, P.A. >4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 > Naples, Florida 34103 > (239)435-3535 > (239)435-1218 (f) > 1 1 1 G FilsonSue Subject: Sereno Grove - make sure it is on regular agenda Start Date: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 Due Date: Monday, May 22, 2017 Status: Completed Percent Complete: 100% Date Completed: Friday, May 26, 2017 Total Work: 0 hours Actual Work: 0 hours Owner: FilsonSue 1 1 1 G FilsonSue From: BrockMaryJo Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 8:26 AM To: FilsonSue Subject: RE: Sereno Grove You're all set...thanks, MJ Mary-Jo Brock - Executive Assistant to Leo E.Ochs,Jr. - County Manager's Office maryjobrockcolliergov_.net 239.252.8364 From: FilsonSue Sent: Monday, June 19, 2017 8:25 AM To: BrockMaryJo Subject: Sereno Grove Hi Mary Jo, Good Morning. Matt McLean let me know that Sereno would be on the agenda for 6/27/17 and just wanted to remind you that Commissioner McDaniel asked that it be on the regular agenda. Do I need to do anything special other than this email? Thanks,Sue Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 h G FilsonSue From: McLeanMatthew Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 3:32 PM To: FilsonSue Cc: FrenchJames Subject: Sereno Grove Sue, This Sereno Grove plat will be on the June 27 BCC agenda. I have talked to Sherri Roberts and advised her that it will be on that agenda and that if anything changes I will let her know. Corer County Matt McLean, P.E. Collier County Growth Management Department Director-Development Review Division 2800 N.Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Phone: 239-252-8279 Fax: 239-252-6945 How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request. do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 11G FilsonSue From: Sheri Roberts <roberts.sheri@att.net> Sent: Monday, June 12, 2017 8:13 AM To: McDanielBill Cc: FilsonSue Subject: Sereno Grove Update Commissioner McDaniel, Once again, I would like to thank you for taking the time to meet with me, my neighbor and the representative of our Wilshire Lakes Homeowners Association ("HOA") on March 20, 2017, and for arranging to move this item from the consent to the regular agenda, which will hopefully continue to apply whenever the hearing is actually held. Unfortunately, since March things have not improved with respect to the development known as Sereno Grove at Pelican Marsh. WCI/Lennar continues to refuse to speak to us and now they are seeking approval of changes to their plat and construction plans for Sereno Grove ("PPL") through a process termed an insubstantial change ("ICP"), in order to avoid ever needing to do so (application #20170001891). However, the changes they propose are not "insubstantial;" they involve a complete re-work of the wastewater and water distribution facilities for the PPL. In mid-April, we were advised that management of WCI/Lennar would meet with us to discuss our concerns, and we were asked to contact Rhonda Brewer, their VP of Community Development, to set up a meeting. I called and spoke to Ms. Brewer on April 19, 2017, and provided her with my availability: three full days and one half-day from April 25 through May 2. She thanked me for being so flexible, but then never contacted me to arrange a meeting. Instead, WCI/Lennar was working behind the scenes to reconfigure their PPL, a revised version of which was filed with the county on May 24 along with their request for an ICP. As a reminder and by way of background with respect to the ICP, in February WCI/Lennar's agent contacted our HOA President to discuss WCI/Lennar's need for easements to tie into the Wilshire Lakes stub-outs for water and sewer, since no such easements exist. Use of the Wilshire Lakes stub-outs was assumed in WCI/Lennar's initial plans as it would be the most cost-effective location and alignment to provide the necessary water and sewer connections for Sereno Grove. Our HOA President advised the representative that she wanted to include me and my neighbors in the discussion so that we could resolve all issues at the same time. Initially, they agreed and a meeting was set for February 13. However, on or about February 3 when WCI/Lennar's counsel advised ours that WCI "did not see any benefit to discussing" our request to address the location of the roadway in their plan, WCI/Lennar's agent canceled that February 13 meeting. In connection with their current application for an ICP, WCI/Lennar has significantly reconfigured their plan, spending time and money to do so, to avoid speaking to our HOA about those stub-outs and, therefore, avoiding the need to address the positioning of their roadway so close to my home and the homes of my neighbors. In their revised PPL, they intend to move the utility connection locations to Livingston Road, which would result in a connection that is approximately 1/4 mile west of their westernmost property line, rather than use the Wilshire Lakes stub-outs which are located approximately 10 feet east of their easternmost property line. They then argue that, because of the time required to obtain the necessary permits to do this, it would create a "considerable economic hardship to the developer" and they propose that the wastewater facilities will now be privately owned and maintained. They claim that this self-imposed hardship entitles them to obtain approval for these changes through the ICP process. It is obvious that their unwillingness to address the positioning of their roadway so close to our homes has nothing to do with either the cost of doing so or the time necessary to re-work their plans. The alternative plan created by our engineer (who we hired and paid) was provided to WCI/Lennar in January; the changes included in that plan would be relatively cost neutral to WCI/Lennar and would also retain the same number of 1 1 1 G lots Of eiquivalent size. Rather than consider that configuration, WCI/Lennar has wasted time developing a new plan moving the water and sewer tie-ins for which, according to their own engineer's opinion, the probable additional construction cost will be over $210,000 (which does not seem to include permitting, filing or engineering fees). For less cost, they could have used our engineer's plan and been in a position to obtain approval of their PPL at the May 9 Board of County Commissioners ("BOCC") meeting, as originally scheduled. They chose not to do so, but are now requesting an abeyance from legal requirements in order to obtain approval for their significantly revised plan. WCI/Lennar has made it clear that they are more interested in spending their time and money pushing for approval for a PPL that is inconsistent and incompatible with the surrounding land uses, than make any attempt to recognize the rights of existing homeowners. Under their proposed PPL, myself and my neighbors will be forced to bear disproportionate negative impacts from the WCI/Lennar development in excess of those borne by any other homeowners within Sereno Grove or the surrounding communities. This is a blatant disregard for the property interests of existing homeowners. At this point, the ICP application has not yet been approved; it is currently in a resubmittal phase according to the county website. Last week John Houldsworth advised me that the PPL is tentatively on the BOCC schedule for June 27. Thank you for taking the time to review this and remain engaged on this issue. If you have any questions or would like to schedule a call or a meeting to further discuss these developments, please let me know. Kind regards, Sheri Roberts roberts.sheriatt.net Mobile: (248) 630-5194 2 1 1 G FilsonSue From: McLeanMatthew Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 8:58 AM To: BrockMaryJo Cc: FilsonSue; BosiMichael; FrenchJames Subject: RE: Sereno Grove MJ, Jamie is going to call you to discuss. Co er County Matt McLean, P.E. Collier County Growth Management Department Director- Development Review Division 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Phone:239-252-8279 Fax:239-252-6945 How are we doing? Please CLICK HERE to fill out a Customer Survey. We appreciate your Feedback! From: BrockMaryJo Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 8:53 AM To: FilsonSue <SueFilson@colliergov.net>; McLeanMatthew<MatthewMcLean@colliergov.net>; BosiMichael <MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; FrenchJames<jamesfrench@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Sereno Grove Good morning, GMD...can you confirm when Sereno Grove will be heard? Thanks, MJ Mary-Jo Brock - Executive Assistant to Leo E.Ochs,Jr. - County Manager's Office maryjobrocic@colliergov.net 239.252.8364 From: FilsonSue Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 8:51 AM To: BrockMaryJo Subject: FW: Sereno Grove 1 1 1 G Happy Friday Mary Jo, Can you tell me if this has been moved again? It looks like it is now the June 27th meeting. Can you confirm? Thank you, Sue From: FilsonSue Sent:Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:25 AM To: BrockMaryJo <MaryJoBrock@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Sereno Grove Thank you Mary Jo Sue From: BrockMaryJo Sent:Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:20 AM To: FilsonSue <SueFilson(a@colliergov.net> Cc: CasalanguidaNick<NickCasalanguida@colliergov.net>; BosiMichael <MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; McLeanMatthew <MatthewMcLean@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Sereno Grove Good morning Sue,The below item has been moved to the June 13 meeting, and is still currently on the regular agenda. Thank you, MJ Mary-Jo Brock - Executive Assistant to Leo E.Ochs,Jr. - County Manager's Office maryjobrock@colliergov.net 239.252.8364 2 1 1 G • FilsonSue From: BrockMarylo Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 8:58 AM To: FilsonSue Subject: RE: Sereno Grove Sue, I heard back from Jamie,they do not have a definite date yet, but will let us know when they do. Thanks, MJ Mary-Jo Brock - Executive Assistant to Leo E.Ochs,Jr. - County Manager's Office maryjobrock@colliergov.net 239.252.8364 From: FilsonSue Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 8:51 AM To: BrockMarylo Subject: FW: Sereno Grove Happy Friday Mary Jo, Can you tell me if this has been moved again? It looks like it is now the June 27th meeting. Can you confirm? Thank you,Sue From: FilsonSue Sent:Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:25 AM To: BrockMarylo<MaryJoBrock@colliergov.net> Subject: RE:Sereno Grove Thank you Mary Jo Sue From: BrockMarylo Sent:Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:20 AM To: FilsonSue<SueFilsonCa@colliergov.net> Cc:CasalanguidaNick<NickCasalanguida@colliergov.net>; BosiMichael<MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; McLeanMatthew <MatthewMcLean@colliergov.net> Subject: RE:Sereno Grove Good morning Sue,The below item has been moved to the June 13 meeting, and is still currently on the regular agenda. Thank you, M1 Mary-Jo Brock - Executive Assistant to Leo E.Ochs,Jr. - County Manager's Office maryjobrock@colliergov.net 1 1 G FilsonSue From: BrockMaryJo Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 8:53 AM To: FilsonSue; McLeanMatthew; BosiMichael; FrenchJames Subject: RE: Sereno Grove Good morning, GMD...can you confirm when Sereno Grove will be heard? Thanks, M1 Mary-Jo Brock - Executive Assistant to Leo E.Ochs,Jr. - County Manager's Office mary_jobrock@colliergov.net 239.252.8364 From: FilsonSue Sent: Friday, May 19, 2017 8:51 AM To: BrockMaryJo Subject: FW: Sereno Grove Happy Friday Mary Jo, Can you tell me if this has been moved again? It looks like it is now the June 27th meeting. Can you confirm? Thank you,Sue From: FilsonSue Sent:Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:25 AM To: BrockMaryJo<MaryJoBrock@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Sereno Grove Thank you Mary Jo Sue From: BrockMaryJo Sent:Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:20 AM To: FilsonSue<SueFilson@colliergov.net> Cc: CasalanguidaNick<NickCasalanguida@colliergov.net>; BosiMichael <MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; McLeanMatthew <MatthewMcLean@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Sereno Grove Good morning Sue,The below item has been moved to the June 13 meeting, and is still currently on the regular agenda. Thank you, MJ Mary-Jo Brock - Executive Assistant to Leo E.Ochs,Jr. - County Manager's Office maryjobrock@a colliergov.net 1 239.252.8364 1 1 G Agenda.ant!Minute' _ File Edit view Lists Tccss Reports '44*;ndow +'&p _;i rde.. • j ..,.• >,;d ., Starch • IL Save&Close g Abandon a ) History 4 ►' t Qukk eros j.=., .- ., Feral Peat approval x ;, r ,D r l> Action Item ID# 2965 Bevelas:. > SCO- vtaitinp ter My Atotca•aI $Fprt terns: Status: A Submilkd • Iter_cot Dome:lents w. {3muse! sutenittid By: Tae.t Mooting, 1 2965 Final Plat approval s Growth Manapccn+ta t Der Mathew McLean H 6132017 900..M Duel•Fleduli Meetmp !.' .if May 9.2017 900 44 Ager. spcnscra(Gptiarvl)r H Catvyoryi.. 11 County Man:icS*s Pcpert v, MO Employee ct the hkr : a 2939 Boe c Safety 2°"' 3119-J3?Monad Ike atm I r•die May 9tti srsteting to d'a„lure 1.1h reeetirg Aar Mae Act e 1 3123 Imkgr,ste.tribgabcn' Alla,A13,VF : e4 t approver ting in 3,sera to Mark haewscrs ai Stade 3 3136 Pr -Natio. i 3119 RecOmiOorabor Fr, Details Fire More pudiasinp Revfase Grants Revi+rrr Dei4as St No lin .i No `:e Attorney Ravii . Deportment Hail Boyle: 2965: Fal Plat appramal Saerro 6re>.ra Scott Store 174.1:1 David\�+11kisen lT Type.Action ltters 13 this•tern qusai•judidai'; Group Board 44 Caurity Cersmm Slates Submitted This IDCe requires teat all parbotparts be shorn ri I.► Meeting Tue 813/2017 9:00 Alio Work items. 1 Matiew McLean(Review C J Workflow o. r•:-.1;r-z w:,: ,.., ii 4,;,,..: ..c-c, ' T : R5caCiINYIPW 1Stet 6w1 MINI**CC stagerReviewer I DcaClipti0lDue C Flit 1'Gra** at Master McLeanAO Snei Reviewer 0Completed9 /2Suitt See{ Carole 2 David 1'lilkiscn-(P iriewyvSkop 1 Chris Ston Addiaatei Revsewer 0 Coery Bled _I 2.James French{Raw aw Corn t Bret Rgsenbium JCrkAoripf Renewer 3.Jeffrey A.Klatekose(Rei ex 6 Correleted / 3 Mark leaekaon(Review Per. 1 Groat,management Deparvre Level 1 Division Reviewer lam► Cce peekd f 3.Valerie Remote(Review Co 4.County Manager's otRce(Poe 2 Scpt St°r• Level 2 Attorney Review a Cro :deted J 5.Board etCourdyCc+nmuio P i. .. .r..c.;a: e44,4:-4..Z44440.4,:444.:» 444 Submittal Tue 32&'2017 t S iwe4 f Department Gro.t%M riagerve 2 dames French Addtiaial Revrevier 0 Corrpletei / Sarratted By Matthew McLean 3 Jeffrey A Ielatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's • Carrpleteed Category:1 County Manatees Pending Review No 3 Mark iseekson ,dditienel Rev:ei et Grants Review No 3 Veld.naming Leel 3 OMB Ge ekeepet • 0 Cometesed J Attorney Review Socia Stone Cepertmerd Head Review David A County Mseagers of!'rae Level 4 Coity Mirage+ • iat Pending Prepared Tue 12802017 6.03A t 5 Board dCsunt'Commissioner Meeting M06N13177 0900AM Jpdxed ',led a119r2017 5 00 P alt Nosing Attachments a :.gym-,Se 4 ;-.6-6tirote I, Type !Visibility Tide Rev A Stops File Public Locator Map File Public ©pinion of Cost File Public Flat Mao .i. e„ ..i. 1 t6` ',,3 ts,i 4..' - ' 'I' W _l 8 X u 414 I alt f` -- till Lleskide Ava fabley+ e From: OchsLeo Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:12 PM To: FilsonSue Cc: CasalanguidaNick; BosiMichael; BrockMaryJo Subject: Re: Sereno Grove 2 1 1 G FilsonSue From: FilsonSue Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 12:30 PM To: 'Sheri Roberts' Subject: FW: Sereno Grove Any time,we are here to help. Sue From:Sheri Roberts [mailto:roberts.sheri@att.net] Sent:Wednesday, May 3, 2017 12:26 PM To: FilsonSue<SueFilson@colliergov.net> Subject: Re: Sereno Grove Sue: Thank you so much for the update. We appreciate it. Kind regards, Sheri Roberts Roberts.sheri(a)att.n et Mobile: (248)630-5194 From: FilsonSue <SueFilson(a)colliergov.net> To: "Roberts.sheri a(�att.net" <Roberts.sheri a(�att.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:27 AM Subject: FW: Sereno Grove Hi Sheri, I just received the following email regarding Sereno Grove and wanted to let you know. Please let me know if you require additional information. Sue Filson, Aide to William L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 -Web Rage, WEB PAGE: '= Subscribe to our mailing List: 1 1 1 G FilsonSue From: Sheri Roberts <roberts.sheri@att.net> Sent: Wednesday, May 3, 2017 12:26 PM To: FilsonSue Subject: Re: Sereno Grove Sue: Thank you so much for the update. We appreciate it. Kind regards, Sheri Roberts Roberts.sheri@att.net Mobile: (248) 630-5194 From: FilsonSue <SueFilson@colliergov.net> To: "Roberts.sheri@att.net" <Roberts.sheri@att.net> Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:27 AM Subject: FW: Sereno Grove Hi Sheri, I just received the following email regarding Sereno Grove and wanted to let you know. Please let me know if you require additional information. Sue Filson, Aide to William L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 ® Web Page WEB PAGE: AIMESubscribe to our mailing List: From: BrockMaryJo Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:20 AM To: FilsonSue <SueFilson@colliergov.net> Cc: CasalanguidaNick <NickCasalanguida@colliergov.net>; BosiMichael <MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; McLeanMatthew <MatthewMcLean@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Sereno Grove 1 1 1 G Good morning Sue, The below item has been moved to the June 13 meeting, and is still currently on the regular agenda. Thank you, MJ Mary-Jo Brock - Executive Assistant to Leo E. Ochs, Jr. - County Manager's Office maryjobrockCa�colliergov.net 239.252.8364 Agendas and Minute: .�.�. __ _� ��..• ,�., .tea _ ,� ,. -�-�.,•--� _-- _ ��... File Edit View L.<s Toes Reports Window kelp �� Ne„ • r# - :.4 A ..::1 Search * a.' Save&Ctese 'g Abandon • .;,J History ;,;:on ser "kir` .;;;ii; CSutcJ(Links -',. , Final Plat approval x i Action Item ID# 2965 4.)My Pending Di:owns-fits _.. :tirC. . -. . ;t U... ..4,19i2,217500 PM ▪Wailing IM My Approve SM:Grt Horn•: Stelae: h :-.Ma So6sn:0ed • Recent Documents to, Qrvil4Onf esti fitted ey= Target Maearga 2965 Final Ply apcvovad 5 Growth Mannernerrt Ce•: 1 Mather/McLean :1 613+2017 9CO MA(The).Re lay Mee ,• i May 9.2017 9{,14 AM Ape: SPonscra(Optrarat: CataWaM.& ▪ Etrrpto;ee or the Mon L •J ;11 Courcy Managers Report I.w i 293 Safety rano. l +t 19-.tR hto-red dee rim traer,die May 3th rheistn to etre.liege 13th meeting Det Mat 14a1ea<r. i 3123 t Mdfne esnitaion wo I 'V'S,'IF erwnved by Vainfie Flim.rn 9..ne 3.soli in►'c4 +•;arkscv,/i aft 3 1 3135:PTactin satiaa-Natio. 1 3119 Resi ` Rea nt 2Details Find ttLec P,..thasiry P.vrer•,: Grants Rwilea Details sz to r _loci+ &ttorrtiy Se.,,r,,,: Diefart Had Reviews 2965:Final Plat approval - SerenaGlove . Scott Stone i David Hhlbaon Type:Ac item b Uss Mian oses•ju.:;od': Cirownd abbnil al Suhmited Cosily CGrrnss , ibis item rate neat ail pertrtrpans t e swan re LJ Meeting Toe 61162017 9 00 at Week Items' � 1 Matthew McLean(Renew C t=i Workflow 0S}ncroruzeRe<:rinii ItEtat`i3Gu + ..ciscek.;f,.- 1 Chats SCcc(Review°MOSS I Brat Rasenrbtwn(Review Co 1=2 Renewer Desaipreon Due CrateSins i !I 1.Growth Maapemert Depart 2.Sone Stone{ xwComae I Marx M✓tleen A4disonat Reviewer {►Completed ,/ 2.David'!•xiik son LRmitiret Skis 1 Ch+a Scent Addit+ond R eWte 2.,lames FraKbCorn(Review c rcdrt r / 3-Jeffrey A.Klatdtan'(Review 1 e+eit RO.erpir rr Addrna'at Renewer A Coir into J 3 Mark tseeksen(Review Per. I Grath Management Des;artrrs Levet 1 Drvisron Rav+eMx Corrpieltd 4.ValerCounty Fleming(Review( 2 Scce Stone Level 2 Attorney ey Ravisw Q Coroiesed 1 4.County ltanapads 016rce(Re 5 Board olCourdyCausnssra F ,,,;t 4e.et:- ws-i..r,-.:4X.:r:wi u, ,.:i;,,,,, { Sutaitst Toe 92&2217 Department Growth ilanepeme 2 James Freer& Additional Renewer 0 Convicted / Submitted [ CaMgory:11 County Idarra4efs JiRre�A.(gawp,* Level Canty Cetorney e • Completed / PurchotiIQBevis;No a 3 Marr isatison Additional Re-newer •Pending Grads Review No - 3 Valese Fleng Level 3 OMB Grxlekeeoer • •Completed / Attorney Review-.SSoneSconem Depxtrnerr,Head Review-David 4 County Maaagars Cle a Lt al 4 Comity Manages • 1i Parading Prepared Toe 3262017 6:03« 5 Board d co a+N torrvnissaner Meetirq 06rt3r77 O9.00 AM Urraied 'red4.'1}'201?50013 P "'4 Attachments a ...,..1,.,:c ti, Ti pe !Vrsrbirtyl Trt1e Rev p Statue File PuNie Location Map File PUNIC Opnion of Coit Frit Attic Rat Map ri Pr up:a e:.:�a;latle , 0 VP 6 ot ISA .4 ,"., . ,,,,, r i 1 1 G From: BrockMaryJo Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 11:20 AM To: FilsonSue <SueFilson@colliergov.net> Cc: CasalanguidaNick <NickCasalanguidacolliergov.net>; BosiMichael <MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; McLeanMatthew <MatthewMcLean(a�colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Sereno Grove Good morning Sue, The below item has been moved to the June 13 meeting, and is still currently on the regular agenda. Thank you, MJ Mary-Jo Brock - Executive Assistant to Leo E. Ochs, Jr. - County Manager's Office maryjobrock(a�colliergov.net 239.252.8364 2 1 1 G FilsonSue From: Sheri Roberts <roberts.sheri@att.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:57 PM To: FilsonSue Cc: Patrick White Subject: Re: Sereno Grove Commissioner McDaniel/Ms. Filson: I was just about to return Sue's voice message, and I saw your email (below). Thank you for your assistance with this. To date we have not been successful in our efforts to get WCI to engage in a discussion to resolve this. Kind regards, Sheri Roberts Roberts.sheri@att.net Mobile: (248) 630-5194 From: FilsonSue <SueFilson@colliergov.net> To: "Roberts.sheri@att.net" <Roberts.sheri@att.net> Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:38 PM Subject: Sereno Grove Ms. Roberts, thank you for your telephone call of April 11, 2017 requesting that Sereno Grove be pulled from the consent agenda and placed on the regular agenda for MayStn Please be advised that I contacted the County Manager and he has assured me that this item will be placed on the regular agenda. If I can be of assistance to you in the future, please do not hesitate to contact my office. Bill William L. McDaniel, Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: www.colliergov.net/CommissionerMcDaniel Subscribe to our mailing list: „,..!ii, ,,K 1 1 1 G FilsonSue From: HouldsworthJohn Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:51 PM To: FilsonSue Subject: FW: Sereno Grove Sue,you're Back!! Welcome From: Michael Delate [mailto:mdelate@gradyminor.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:44 PM To: HouldsworthJohn <johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Sereno Grove Yep. 5/9? Not unexpected. From: HouldsworthJohn [mailto:johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net] Sent:Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:28 PM To: Michael Delate <mdelate@gradyminor.com> Subject: FW: Sereno Grove Mike, Better attend BCC meeting and bring attorney? From: BosiMichael Sent:Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:26 PM To: McLeanMatthew<MatthewMcLean@colliergov.net>; HouldsworthJohn <johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net> Subject: FW: Sereno Grove FYI Gentlemen. From: BrockMaryJo Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:16 PM To: OchsLeo<LeoOchsCa@colliergov.net>; FilsonSue<SueFilson@colliergov.net> Cc: CasalanguidaNick<NickCasalanguida@colliergov.net>; BosiMichael <MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; PuigJudy <JudyPuig@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Sereno Grove Item 2965 has been moved to the regular agenda. Thanks, MJ Mary-Jo Brock - Executive Assistant to Leo E.Ochs,Jr. - County Manager's Office maryjobrock@colliergov.net 239.252.8364 1 1 1 G FilsonSue From: BrockMaryJo Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:16 PM To: OchsLeo; FilsonSue Cc: CasalanguidaNick; BosiMichael; PuigJudy Subject: RE: Sereno Grove Item 2965 has been moved to the regular agenda. Thanks, MJ Mary-Jo Brock - Executive Assistant to Leo E.Ochs,Jr. - County Manager's Office maryjobrock@colliergov.net 239.252.8364 From: OchsLeo Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:12 PM To: FilsonSue Cc: CasalanguidaNick; BosiMichael; BrockMaryJo Subject: Re: Sereno Grove We'll make to place it on the regular agenda On Apr 12, 2017, at 12:55 PM, FilsonSue<SueFilson@colliergov.net>wrote: • Hi Leo, I hope you are having a good day. We received a telephone call from Ms. Sheri Roberts requesting that Sereno Grove be pulled from the consent agenda for the May 9th agenda and placed on the regular agenda. Commissioner Solis is abstaining so they are requesting Commissioner McDaniel pull it. Can we do that with this email or do I need to make a note and contact you when the agenda comes out? Thank you. Sue Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 1 1 G FilsonSue From: OchsLeo Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:12 PM To: FilsonSue Cc: CasalanguidaNick; BosiMichael; BrockMaryJo Subject: Re: Sereno Grove We'll make to place it on the regular agenda On Apr 12, 2017, at 12:55 PM, FilsonSue<SueFilson@colliergov.net>wrote: Hi Leo, I hope you are having a good day. We received a telephone call from Ms. Sheri Roberts requesting that Sereno Grove be pulled from the consent agenda for the May 9th agenda and placed on the regular agenda. Commissioner Solis is abstaining so they are requesting Commissioner McDaniel pull it. Can we do that with this email or do I need to make a note and contact you when the agenda comes out? Thank you. Sue Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 G Agenda:and Minutes 7:14III'U;!, - I I,_ II ''4.4.4L. :.:'';a04.;11';':: r ,,....ary •.4,...,.. , y.y_P : rFile Edit View Lists Tools Reports Window Help New n 44 j „I• .5) ta j . Searth ... .i2..li Save Es Close 4 Abandon • ..) History 45 4 lb• ...6 L1 ' -. x 0.1 ...;',. .:--„,...,., .4),Final Piet approval_' 4 a Action Item ID# 2965 1 ii:t My Pending Doci.rnants Boar4.10 Crum Cornabssionnts U.• tad 41%2017 500 PM 4 wP Noting kir My AppgcY41 if.• 51.441 Nam.: Stati.d: ,q-"'''''''''''''''''''' '2.-r7-,..,:--,-, A.. —vIMIZIt !'AiSubloited • Su belirt•d'iv TAMt.!..keebng. a 2965 Final Piet approval S. Growth Maragerrent Dev I. Mahe a McLean RI 1 61141,2017 9.00..:.M(1%,e)i Regixtrir Meet tit t :tr May 9.2017 900 4 Aver sPqm.m.190.0110)1 ILA 3090 EnpitTee o#'41, Moo -0 ,ii co,..„'Manager's Rsirort 1M a2939 Papoter Safety Zone. 4 19-JP Mei- e iten i ItOlt dic Mai 9tr:lovettog to te Jure 1311 inerAno OW Mat MAX-1,, A 31z3 wk,f..„.,...c,..,,.. 4;18''NC'kl,{Creed by Valoon Fteosng al 9„epit 3,Len.a ln Mark back sor la 6.:304!3 4 413- dF Added OMB amover 1 3136 Proclamation-Nebo. 1 11 5 Recc.r4-14er4cr'R.:2 2 Details IFind More. : 4 -, Parplunang Review Grants 1414111W: DtbilIF ' ..,•::f' ': '''' I 7:: No ...................____41). Attorney R.V 4IVN 4 1 Department Heed RSVP'., 21165:Fatal Plat appernal r— SeVt Store I..4. David 1,41kisto IIL-43 ' Serena Gems Type:Acton teen II th&"Aern q....41,1.4.cuW: Gr eup:Board et Cora*Contras Status.Siimided This ibersi reowee*4t all paroopants be Voir ifi Meeting Tue 613/2417 9-CCI At Vktit Mew 1 Matthew McLean(Review C (i Workflow 'Syr-avow&Roulmo le edevie, 1 Chris Scat(Review Contact 1 Sri*Rosenkiwn(Review Co E:n Renewer Orrecricticn Ova Date Stata _ I/ .:, 1.Growth Pdanivemere Depart I mutt,,,,,sktee, Acidibcrei Rene:set 2.Scott Saxer(Review parole 0 corvieed / t 2.David Warmer Tarte Skip v, I Chris Scott Addittme Reviewer 0 Completed / 2.,James French(Renew Can f1 i. Ere Roserbivi, 3.. ey A.Klattikow(Review 1 Addracriat Rerrevier 0 Coreeeed / 3,Mark fts-doott Revrew Peri 1 Gress*Mariegernent Departre Level 1 Orrisvon Reviewer 0 Corredesed 1 3.Valerie Fleming(Review Ce 4.Corey Manages Ofice(Re 2 S:cC SI" Uwe 2 Attar-ley Review 0 Cell:deed I 5.Board el County Co , ; --‘40:444,4,,,,L4K, vvir.:-.Z.:viii..4w- 4:-...ain.r.vstratir, Jo:- ....4"-- ririvir i Submitted:Tue 3211/2017 .,- Defertment Stat manage** 2 lames Frei& Additionat Renewer 0 Corrplecd / --; Submitted 13 -litalferew McLean 3 Jeffrey A.igatzkow Level 3 Casty Albxrey's • 0 C44arl: ,d / j, =ono:1 1ReC:erflintYNik:er4i*s 3 Mani Isatitson itartmorier Renewer is4 Pending Grants Review:Me 3 Valerie Fierring Level 3 OMB Geteketoes- • 0 Corpteed / Monet Review Stott Same = Department Head Review:David 4 Coyote Men .Orem Level I Coit,t44r4444 . #Peopling Reared:Tue 312S2017 6-53 A e0613A7 05(X)AM 414 peocing pdated$ U :S*44,1912017 500 P 8°1'd 4 Cc'gtv Cctrinissione' kilet/irl I . l' i..--....)Attachments Tete Rev a Status 1 ,..,-.:-,-..,-:,...,----..-.-,-- i File Asiatic Location Map . .. . -4.., 44:4.. .1,4,;,-4F4-4.4.'4,,, 4 ,-.1„ .4-„4-4,.II-44444 File Public Crtinico of Cost —., . . .. _ ...... _. r.i.:,-;.:-:-.,-.----.--:.:- ., - : ','----::::.4,-,.:.o.,4- I Fee PuHit Plat Nap . , :... . ... . . .- . . ... . Mt voriositerts de oP -7.- ,--- --:7- . From: OchsLeo Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:12 PM To: FilsonSue Cc: CasalanguidaNick; BosiMichael; BrockMaryJo Subject: Re: Sereno Grove We'll make to place it on the regular agenda 3 ts On Apr 12, 2017, at 12:55 PM, FilsonSue <SueFilson@colliergov.net>wrote: 1 1 G Hi Leo, I hope you are having a good day. We received a telephone call from Ms. Sheri Roberts requesting that Sereno Grove be pulled from the consent agenda for the May 9th agenda and placed on the regular agenda. Commissioner Solis is abstaining so they are requesting Commissioner McDaniel pull it. Can we do that with this email or do I need to make a note and contact you when the agenda comes out? Thank you. Sue Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 4 1 1 G FilsonSue From: FilsonSue Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:29 PM To: BrockMaryJo Subject: RE: Sereno Grove Thank you very much. Sue From: BrockMaryJo Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:16 PM To: OchsLeo<LeoOchs@colliergov.net>; FilsonSue <SueFilson@colliergov.net> Cc: CasalanguidaNick<NickCasalanguida@colliergov.net>; BosiMichael <MichaelBosi@colliergov.net>; PuigJudy <JudyPuig@colliergov.net> Subject: RE: Sereno Grove Item 2965 has been moved to the regular agenda. Thanks, MJ Mary-Jo Brock - Executive Assistant to Leo E.Ochs,Jr. - County Manager's Office nnaryjobrock@colliergov.net 239.252.8364 From: OchsLeo Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:12 PM To: FilsonSue Cc: CasalanguidaNick; BosiMichael; BrockMaryJo Subject: Re: Sereno Grove We'll make to place it on the regular agenda On Apr 12, 2017, at 12:55 PM, FilsonSue <SueFilson@colliergov.net>wrote: Hi Leo, I hope you are having a good day. We received a telephone call from Ms. Sheri Roberts requesting that Sereno Grove be pulled from the consent agenda for the May 9th agenda and placed on the regular agenda. Commissioner Solis is abstaining so they are requesting Commissioner McDaniel pull it. Can we do that with this email or do I need to make a note and contact you when the agenda comes out? Thank you. Sue Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. On Apr 12, 2017, at 12:55 PM, FilsonSue <SueFilsoncolliergov.net> wrote: 1 1 G Hi Leo, I hope you are having a good day. We received a telephone call from Ms. Sheri Roberts requesting that Sereno Grove be pulled from the consent agenda for the May 9th agenda and placed on the regular agenda. Commissioner Solis is abstaining so they are requesting Commissioner McDaniel pull it. Can we do that with this email or do I need to make a note and contact you when the agenda comes out? Thank you. Sue Under Florida Law, e-mail addresses are public records. If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request, do not send electronic mail to this entity. Instead, contact this office by telephone or in writing. 4 11G FilsonSue From: FilsonSue Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:39 PM To: Roberts.sheri@att.net Subject: Sereno Grove Ms. Roberts,thank you for your telephone call of April 11, 2017 requesting that Sereno Grove be pulled from the consent agenda and placed on the regular agenda for May 9th Please be advised that I contacted the County Manager and he has assured me that this item will be placed on the regular agenda. If I canbe of assistance to you in the future, please do not hesitate to contact my office. William L. McDaniel,Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 WEB PAGE: www.colliergov.net/CommissionerMcDaniel Subscribe to our mailing list: 1 1 G F<,, r Ag • enda:and Mmute' File Edit View bits Tools Reports Window hte:p *less - r>f . . •' Id A J Search - ,.' Save&close Aisanden J history .fd .4 a r r.'' _ - 2.2:: QUXA Ltnks . Action Item ID# 2965 . Ft-4,/%Ane. `tatcs- Retent Cocttrnents a r),,i.:,. 5.-e,–..d•::a -arp t w,.t,ry. t t_.'' ..nt,.±',.:-..s • r':ftht 11.;Lea., . [''.-i ,;:Q:.!':';f,•Regular Meet,r; _r Sperscrs(Cptcrai;-.. Catay--cr, _� _ • .1 Co' !'arne s Pew! . Al r z �� u = aw t� _J 0 r '.r 'fir.a'-' {� _2,--...!'„,.7.,;4. -3;11.4,,,,4'A . _ '" . ,,,,',� '' 5 s _ "' ._ Details C,,,:havr.;Per.e..- C,rarts Pe qt,.: Dr tats ., do t!o . Att.,ra, Ft.•.. 0•P••••,1114 1,ta:1 So;,t 2965:Final Plat approval r4'.9.,:ne �e Ca..0.'='.71kiace Sereno Grove T,Pe 4:-;4;e!te!r. is th.,.,ter+c'.as, :•aa`'. 3rcdp Boated Carty Can-ma 7h,,rte'r tep;:,!es".het al por.c.pms be I.r.tyrn r Stats S,1x-,tea • 'teebnq I've 613<ti'79:4Ata •':rk real ' t*atthe'a McLean(Rrr+ra C '--..L1 Workf tow ii Chres Scut(Review Car-.Ftc I Brett Rosert e Rev,ea Co stage i Re.leaer Cescr,tacr, Cue pate Status j/ Gr 41Depart ._ _ 1 _i _ t r mat:hea P'cLear ..19.t rial Pe•:.esker e0 - / 2 Str,C Stere:Rt.�ea�at�1e Dlyoa.',..ladawra+IReoraSlop 1 Chr,s Scot :.d:,:cr,al Pe=ewe.' / 2 James French tPrara Cern 3 Jeffrey A KlaUktbv(Pe-tea Flea Paterd r d.• .nat Pe,r.+c* j ! 3 Mut(lsacksoe,Pev,ea Per Grt`r. 't'Jr.al€mtrt Cera-n•Te Lr:el'C.,.1 eze Pc.:ee.er / 3 :°ate;te F erm.;;Re,,ex Co 3 Caul),Manager's Of to(Re Sc'' . -.:"4.4' Le.el 2.:..;ire,Re',Fe.. / 5 Savo of Cart'Corur.ssw ,.,_ a / S�tmaed Tu,e 3.2?-2Or Cemrtmert Gram Managere a:ea Fred} ...1.0. r.&Pe:er.er / Sut+ra;!cei Ey Maden McLean 3 _ef4ey A.Ca�ko.. Le.ei 3 Cot.r:ty Adorrey's • d / Category is Cover,'l4rager5 s:sce :ry Pe.P.chasug P.r,'te.s No l.'s k isle , Csrarts Re..,ea tic 3 / Jalrx F'rr,rq Leal �"'£'.satekeexr • Alone'ne'Pe.-e. Sex S tr-e . Cemrhnert Heal Redia *:awls 4 County Manager's;O6ior tc e :_-.=_r, t'rr-» ar • _ ; PreLWedTve3:2 4"-6°3.. C Eosirdc'Cccrt.)Ccrrt',ss,crer t'ee!,rq C ;n3X..!.' 4 'Jpdate. ''1o4 d:9.:v"S X'P Attiichmrnt't $ o T;pe st-a, ,`3e ,Re '..1..z!....... F:le P.,t;,c Loc-anon"a++ t . P1a.`ta: A -..I ■ H r' 1_1 I = From: OchsLeo Sent: Wednesday, April 12, 2017 1:12 PM To: FilsonSue Cc: CasalanguidaNick; BosiMichael; BrockMaryJo Subject: Re: Sereno Grove We'll make to place it on the regular agenda 3 1 1 G FilsonSue From: FilsonSue Sent: Monday, April 10, 2017 7:25 PM To: Roberts.sheri@att.net Subject: Serireno Grove Ms. Roberts,thank you for your call today advising that Serrano Grove is scheduled for the May 9th consent agenda and requesting that it be pulled and placed on the regular agenda. I will speak with Commissioner McDaniel tomorrow and let you know his decision. Sue Filson, Executive Coordinator to Commissioner William L. McDaniel,Jr. Sent from my iPad 1 FilsonSue 1 u Subject: Sheri Roberts (248)630-5194 re Sereno Grove at Pelican Marsh Location: BCC Office Start: Mon 3/20/2017 11:00 AM End: Mon 3/20/2017 11:30 AM Recurrence: (none) Organizer: McDanielBill II�'. j �•. 1, Ltr to Attachment 1 - Attachment 2- Attachment 3- Commissioner... Sereno Grove PI...Serena Grove A...Key to Markings... Commissioner McDaniel: My neighbors and I would like to raise with you our concerns regarding the "Sereno Grove at Pelican Marsh" development in Naples. Please see the attached letter and the attachments referenced in that letter. We would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you to discuss. Thank you for your consideration. Kind regards, Sheri Roberts Roberts.sheri(a�att.net Mobile: (248) 630-5194 1 1 1 G • FilsonSue From: FilsonSue on behalf of McDanielBill Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2017 10:47 AM To: Sheri Roberts Subject: RE: Sereno Grove at Pelican Marsh Hi Sheri,this will confirm that I have scheduled you to meet with Commissioner McDaniel on March 2, 2017 from 10:30 to 11:00 at the county complex office. Due to disclosure laws, please provide me with any additional names of neighbors that plan to join you for this meeting. Thank you and we'll see you on March 2nd Sue Filson,Aide to William L. McDaniel,Jr. Commissioner, District 5 3299 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, FL 34112 239-252-8605 www.colliergov.net/CommissionerMcDaniel From:Sheri Roberts [mailto:roberts.sheri@att.net] Sent:Tuesday, February 7, 2017 8:37 AM To: McDanielBill<WilliamMcDanielJr@colliergov.net> Subject:Sereno Grove at Pelican Marsh Commissioner McDaniel: My neighbors and I would like to raise with you our concerns regarding the "Sereno Grove at Pelican Marsh" development in Naples. Please see the attached letter and the attachments referenced in that letter. We would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you to discuss. Thank you for your consideration. Kind regards, Sheri Roberts Roberts.sheri a(7att.net Mobile: (248) 630-5194 1 1 1 G FilsonSue Subject: Sheri Roberts (248)630-5194 re Sereno Grove at Pelican Marsh Location: BCC Office Start: Mon 3/20/2017 11:00 AM End: Mon 3/20/2017 11:30 AM Recurrence: (none) Organizer: McDanielBill r�� eor FnE Faf Ltr to Attachment 1 - Attachment 2- Attachment 3- Commissioner... Sereno Grove Pi...Sereno Grove A...Key to Markings... Commissioner McDaniel: My neighbors and I would like to raise with you our concerns regarding the "Sereno Grove at Pelican Marsh" development in Naples. Please see the attached letter and the attachments referenced in that letter. We would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you to discuss. Thank you for your consideration. Kind regards, Sheri Roberts Robe rts.sheri(a�att.net Mobile: (248) 630-5194 1 1 1 G Thank you for your attention to this matter. We and our HOA look forward to your support and assistance. Sincerely, 7 -4111"1°4 (71,1k, /• l /4<5. 5 11G k 4 � •,�' ak- ii.:::: .:' ' Viii iri. 11 - t 6 i,,,, ..r • 0 * • t `. •. • M . t .i . 0+ . 'li *4N. - Y h. DRAWING# 1 - SERENO AT NAPLES PUD/PELICAN MARSH PRESEN 1'bD AT SEPTEMBER 13 COUNTY COMMISSION MEETING. [NORTH IS TO THE LEFT-HAND SIDE] 3 •. T , . , 1110 c 1,4 41 '14, • > — - — cu L __JL . 1/2 DRAWING#2 - SERENO AT NAPLES PUD/PELICAN MARSH CURRENT PLAN The second issue observed in these two drawings is that Drawing#2 (Current Plan)includes four additional lots not previously shown when presented to you,the commission, for approval. Drawing#2 further encroaches on our back yards with the very minimal Type B border described above. Drawings#1 and#2 create a very small border with hardly any separation for the corner home at 9670 Wilshire Lakes Blvd. Water runoff from roads,traffic,noise and headlights will be on three sides of the house. We are the only homes affected so drastically by the WCI Sereno Grove plan, as you can see on the fourth attachment. Everyone else in our current community and the new community has a preserve or lake view. The planned road extends directly into our back and side yards. Our property values will plummet. Water runoff from so much roadway will exacerbate the water issues that we already have during the rainy season. Further, with the road noise,headlights from vehicles,lack of privacy and diminished view,we will be prevented from enjoying the property we purchased. In addition, our local wildlife,which includes threatened species, will also suffer. We were trying to be constructive by contacting with the developer in an attempt to resolve the issue with an alternative site plan, but WCI has been delaying their response to us while at the same time pressing ahead despite the concerns we have raised. We, of course, are also willing to work with Collier County staff. Since it now seems that an amicable resolution cannot be achieved, we need to consider our legal remedies. It is our feeling that no property owner should be placed in a position of having to spend significant funds on representation to achieve what should be common sense solutions that have been afforded to all other homeowners in the area. 4 • 1 1 G February 7, 2017 BY USPS AND EMAIL Commissioner Bill McDaniel Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3299 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 303 Naples,FL 34112 BillMcDaniel@colliergov.net RE: Disproportionate Adverse Impacts of WCI Sereno Grove Site Plan on our Homes in Wilshire Lakes,Naples To: Honorable Collier County Commissioner Bill McDaniel From: David and Linda Bankston—9664 Wilshire Lakes Blvd,Naples, FL 34109 Jim and Sheri Roberts—9670 Wilshire Lakes Blvd,Naples,FL 34109 Larry and Jessica Doyle—9660 Wilshire Lakes Blvd,Naples,FL 34109 Dear Commissioner McDaniel: The purpose of this letter is to make you aware of information about the WCI Sereno Grove PUD that will cause our homes to absorb more impacts of the WCI development than any other homeowners in either Sereno Grove or Wilshire Lakes. We have tried to address this directly with WCI and even hired an engineering firm to develop an alternate plan that would address our concerns. However,after a great deal of delay,we were advised on Friday, February 3, 2017, that WCI will not discuss this with us. Therefore, we are asking for your help in resolving this matter before it is too late. We all own homes in Wilshire Lakes that directly abut the proposed Sereno Grove,Naples, development. The first attachment depicts the current Sereno Grove construction plan; our properties are highlighted in yellow for your reference. As you can see, WCI has chosen to run their access road from Livingston Road all the way east to within 10 feet of our back property lines,then curve the road north and again east, effectively surrounding the Roberts home at 9670 Wilshire Lakes Blvd. The wall that was proposed earlier in the process to provide separation has been removed from this plan, and the normally 15 foot buffer has itself been reduced to only 10 feet. The buffer will be nothing other than a hedge and trees spaced 25 feet apart. Our homes, much like others, are designed to be open to the back each with a lanai area that is used much like a family room. We will be denied this use and enjoyment of our property if the development proceeds as planned. 1 11G Further,there is a viable alternative for the design of the development that would mitigate the impacts to our properties. This was first discussed with Grady Minor, WCI's agent for this development, on January 9,2017, and then further refined in the following weeks. The second attachment reflects that alternate plan(the third attachment is a key to the markings). This redesign keeps the same number of lots with equivalent lot areas, and should be relatively cost neutral to construct. We presented this refined alternative plan to WCI on January 23, 2017 and, as indicated above,were advised on Friday that they will not even consider it. This blatant disregard for the property interests of existing homeowners is detrimental to the economic development of this area. If homeowners lose confidence that their property rights have any protection,the desire to purchase property in this area will suffer. In the course of addressing this issue,we have also identified flaws in the process that are equally detrimental to preserving homeowner property rights and,therefore,to economic development. There has been a lack of proper notice of this development in more than one respect. Two of the homeowners, including 9670 Wilshire Lakes Blvd. which is most impacted by the proposed roads,were not provided with notice of the September 2016 meeting at which the PUD was approved. The two homes that didn't receive notice are families who moved to Wilshire Lakes for positions with companies that recently relocated to the area. We only learned about the WCI development plans when a separate notice to vacate an easement in the area to be developed was received before the December holidays by one of us. After multiple objections to that easement vacation were filed with the county, including by the Wilshire Lakes Homeowners Association(the"HOA"), the HOA was advised last week by Marcus Berman that WCI has withdrawn its request to vacate the easement. We find it curious that after objections are filed, WCI has now simply withdrawn the request to vacate, denying us the public hearing that would otherwise be required. In addition,there has been some amount of misdirection relating to WCI's intended site plan in notices of the meetings held. At the time of the PUD approval,the board was provided in the official "notice"with a drawing of the proposed development that showed a green space adjacent to our properties. This was consistent with how other adjacent developments were treated— specifically the Marsala PUD received a generous preserve area around all of their adjacent lots. However, as indicated above and on the attachment we are providing to you with this,the document provided to the board and in the notice is not in fact how the developer intends to proceed. WCI's actual plan is not within the spirit or intent of the original approval, nor is it in keeping with notice provisions of the land development code. And most of all, it is not a good land planning solution. Below please find two images reflecting this change. We own the three northerly homes in the orange circle. 2 1 G ,e, 1 „ i _ .t. . iJ '''2'1 1' 11, ;g I. ii. --.- c' III = , I '.,:•1 , , , Psi ,- w jr-,-i 1 :•,, • il',, •••••• (--4' 1 .5), ._ , • !II I //,S 1 •\.....‘\: . /0 I I 11 A <I i' <1[..27"'.s"1 .g)\. -•.•,.-::•:'..---A ., . - . .... r`f mionom 1* .4_ ! - • , t. il 1 4 'rlj h ' I I ! , !iiiii 13 k' i i I IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ,711 , , ,._. t xt Nilli..X.IM'Illit' t. 44.. L,.., ip •••-... -.. s ii s s< IHF>.' ''. \I 1— -- ;• - i i 1 -." '11 ' 7- •) } .> .„ ,! _ _ riga_ME 6 ' 6 i --- i•AlillYV" i: ii V'•i' ' • '4 2 1 ig).- L • .• : _ • ,,, . g ,'.;3, . 01° * \--,1--- --- --- \ 0- i, 0 II 111 1,1 1 ,, `' li ., II III it C g ' i A i - 'g , Cc2...L_____LmL____-• t/4 1 < /1 Ri -....–---r--- < .9 1 * }- P. -- • 11 il' -:,i, : "I 5 ; 4' V 2 ' I N di ---..-... ;i1 linr;11111111/1. iiMiniiiA !';:gi :iNin 'T>1114,,,,im oi i.:Ji.:.iiaii.ii,,, :,, i:::.iiii,],,,,,i,i,i,i HiPg•ji!:.:iii,!ii!il!ii!ii,iP:iiiiiiiniiiMY:i!iliiii:::i ' . .' UM W1401'411 i .iI::IMIIiIi ] .'..: s'II':.i; I'' I :.i::::: : ::::ii:ij]iiii•:]ii:i .iiii :ii:iii:i*.. :iiii 1 : 51' ;z: ;1 .. ..--\ 1J ::','':.:."."qiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiig 11.1 1 1 : '..i: HEiiWi:: :::. Mi'•]il : :]'. :::i:: . i In iiiii{Viiii} t:::•:;•I:I.:I.:I:I:I.:::.: -l.% ''' ..''Yi!i':1:.i'i' I / 6 . F, t . ;;; ,... - •:.......,:....-::.:.. .... ::i:: :::i:i ; :; i: H'::: ],::;':.i : ::i':'ii'.:::::::::ij • n frl ' fli' ------- ---0- --- -_--- . ,... . .'i I 1!.•:!.•:!.•'!i ij,,I. ° :::::::• ' i 1 a] . :: : ; i ':i.. iiii '.°:iii: 1 • 1 URtti . a a a •:•:•:•:: L 4 : .iiiTiiiile!iiiiiiiiRii.':ii:•.'OniiM iiIM• ''', ) -..,:i: .;Y:.i '.',r:' :. ::::ftli . ..,': ii'.::::i:: '.:*' I ''.-Ei.1 % g- g . g.I .... III a a 3 ..,:i:i::iiiiiii .0 •_Z .......... . .... .... ..................... - ' •• •,,,:.:i*i,i*i::*:.,',:':: *,3 3 / •:,:.i,.:ji, ii.: ii :;iiii:i:ii:iii:.:i!i':i :': - _ . A . --, ./.'v ,‘ ,.<''' ,f.:-------';,•:.... .,--:.'-'-':-':--———I— '— _.----,.--,-,,;: .S i fit A Ls , g ii \ s ji s 6 St Ss sv Ss st MO fgl!16 <I V , tI 1 /,':!:) i 'Z''Z''' F71....;--------1)-r4-7,:ilf•-;71;'—'''' 1 I I ! Pi.. V's .1:406 glill! ! \ss <1 ±.-!..:::'-' 1 , i 1 1 .h , ilelliilli I:1 , '..k,__-•:- ,• .__-,„_---,-,,-1 E I ; 2 iq1 A A iro-6 1.1 i MN N'iggeb ......, ,....., g a ii II1:6' ';'; 11 il 1 ii4111 1 s ! ! illiq,1$111/1111' ig i, ,, , -,,, 11 -'----'— ,ttillidbibti 1,1Nito.,111111 / , ••••,' ( !" , i , /111iiinlifinit4iiihhilr' 1=1; .,-,--"tp- .„,_:.......,:- : „ l' '• ''' • „..:. * -‘ • 1,31111•11 1119:11111111,1311...,...11 ,/•Y ' /"l' lig/IV,/ /./././/i/Mttiiiintliiii //7 // / ..;I: .-• ' .; • 7•' ‘. / / / ' 1 / s 7).-/,:f::••.'• A I \ .. - , V /, / ,, , (. 1-... 'T.' ,..• • if • , di19911111111111111111111311/11111, / i _ , li 11,,,, ` • •••,', `,,,,1 , ,.. i; l'agigggligligH311111111114111 , ,- 1/.1: • ;\ , • . I ,"' ', Li :\!•,. o.;• ,i -I1 1 ,./ , .„.., . /..1„ ,.( ,,7-77.... /7 - • q 1 1 ! Ii 1,i;i 4Ai, ‘, i r v •1..0.., i i.ot t t t till ...-4401)1// ,,• • 1 III! '2'4 ,\, Ili 11 ill I- 1;!:i 'r.ig ...et'7 /igi• ,-;;P:>.--• kj• '..•.•., l•,.. I 0..A...--,;',.;: • • - • • '‘i i r'..' l',\ •••••?...M4--;..--..- • • • - Al li iiiiithin I !lr ;.;•,4•••••7/ -- - •'••' , ..;--1:, : ',', • . . . < 1:. , ' i.t•j — ' , I I ii . • .= c.-._::::_. •-• .,--.. .....„"ir.F.:,,,,..- -----",...,.. - __ _ ''''''`!1?).•:•;A•F''--"Srel....P -'-'2- 404/1101140° ;.....'. -...... - ---- 4 •- - . ..---..--- • . - - ..... , ................-..... ,Il X cLA 1 1 G ._ _-_.._ _-_-._ __.-- ;i , E E i cD\ V '...._-.__..- -.__-_.- 4 f d a 7 < Z B { j i .5 I-,a I ,� 1 Q` < c I -----— Li. I t;-- a ---J-- 3 1191 _ , u P.. •_� 0. I i } - _ .,....:..E. \\:N. R3 < \ it ift: , 5 F 'k 411 a- s. rx,-__74.msate-- 1Hu '� s _ > y� e . . PR 4 . 1 —. gilt.,,, , 8 \, ) \ i;_ ___ I .__:---___.:' ,,,'. \ \ sh ( � 1 T W ,�5 1 I 2 �, .., 2 i.‘ 1 %%Nis\ I -Ig A fr."7" WWNI g ° F Rb w a } y §a1,; 1 '1 I ' v. f . a 1 • c 1 ,- $ u I Ai- / I II III: / �4 .... - � 1 - az , � __ o L8_, 4 . 3 11 4y SII i 1 __ ei = n ( ju;µi a NI 4 3 • g. g II m ! '/' / I i j ! I w II I 111 I —.......... 11 _ , 1 1 G Attachment 3 Key to Markings on Sereno Grove Alternative Plan 1. The proposed internal roadway and lot line relocations are shown in heavy black lines. 2. The sewer lift station previously located on the north side of the internal roadway to the southwest of Lot 61 is now on the south side of the roadway, so as to have the lift station be located on the west end of Dry Detention#3 where shown;that is labelled and depicted in black. 3. That lift station relocation allowed this portion of the roadway itself to be moved northward slightly by-15+' on the western end to -10' on the eastern end of that curved roadway section shown again in heavy black lines, to allow further separation from the northern or side yard of the Roberts' lot. 4. The blue lines reflect the location and cross-sections we believe would mitigate the impacts as best as possible with the 10' of landscaping to be located on the east side of the eight(8')foot high wall for relocated lots 13 &47 as shown in Cross-Sections A-A, with the wall on the top of the perimeter berm. 5. The same color lines and 8' wall height are shown on top of the perimeter berm as depicted for Cross-section B-B to the north of the Roberts' home. 6. The dwelling units to be located on lots 13 and 47 are sought to be limited to one story height for their habitable space; and 7. The red lines generally reflect the existing facilities as presently proposed for the location of the internal roadways and lot lines,for perspective.