The URL can be used to link to this page

Agenda 06/27/2017 Item # 9E06/27/2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2007-46, as amended, the Wolf Creek RPUD, to affirm an insubstantial change to the PUD, to add a preserve exhibit that revises the preserve configuration for Parcels 3B and 9 only, and providing for an effective date. The subject property is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately one-half mile west of Collier Boulevard, in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 189± acres. [PDI-PL20160000404] OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) approve an Ordinance, which affirms the decision of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding an insubstantial change to the Wolf Creek RPUD, Ordinance No. 2007-46, as amended, to add a preserve exhibit that revises the preserve configuration for Parcels 3B and 9. CONSIDERATIONS: At the June 1, 2017 CCPC public hearing, the CCPC unanimously approved an insubstantial change to the Wolf Creek PUD to add a preserve exhibit that revises the preserve configuration shown on the existing Master Plan for Parcels 3B and 9 (CCPC Resolution No. 17-03). The approval process for an insubstantial change to a PUD, due to its limited nature, has rested with t he Hearing Examiner Office (HEX) or the CCPC. At the June 13, 2017, Board meeting, the Board directed staff to: 1) Develop and bring forward Land Development and Administrative Code amendments to provide for Board affirmation of the Planning Commission or Hearing Examiner approval of insubstantial changes to PUDs; and 2) To process PDI applications following the PDI process proposed in the interim The Wolf Creek petition is the first PDI that is navigating the new PDI process. As noted, the petition was unanimously approved by the CCPC at the June 1, 2017, advertised public hearing. The applicant is proposing to remove approximately 4.05 acres of the preserve from “Parcel 3B & 9” shown on the existing PUD Master Plan, because the minimum preserve requir ement for the PUD will still be maintained. This change will reduce the preserve area on Parcels 3B and 9 from approximately 7.11 acres to 3.06 acres. This modification does not seek to alter the minimum preserve requirement of 34.26 acres for the PUD. The specifics of the request are contained within the attached staff report. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact associated with the requested affirmation of the Board. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The requested action of an insubstantial change to a PUD will have no impact upon the GMP. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is an insubstantial change amendment to the existing Wolf Creek PUD (Ordinance No. 07-46, as amended). Pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.13 E.2 and Chapter 3, Section G.3 of the Administrative Code for Land Development, the Planning Commission or the Hearing Examiner is the final decision maker for insubstantial change applications. The BCC, on June 13, 2017 directed staff to bring insubstantial changes to Planned Unit Developments to the Board of County Commissioners for affirmation of the approving CCPC Resolution/HEX Decision in order to amend the PUD Ordinance accordingly. The Planning Commission was guided in its decision by the criteria stated in Section 10.02.13.E.2 of the LDC: “An insubstantial change to an approved PUD Ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13.E.1 [criteria for substantial changes] and shall … be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application ….” This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval. (SAS) 9.E Packet Pg. 347 06/27/2017 RECOMMENDATION: That the Board approves the Ordinance amending Ordinance NO. 2007-46, as amended to affirm the June 1, 2017 approval of the CCPC regarding the Wolf Creek PUD insubstantial change, PDI-PL20160000404, to add a preserve exhibit that revises the preserve configuration for Parcels 3B and 9 only. Prepared by: Mike Bosi, AICP, Director, Zoning Division, Growth Management Department ATTACHMENT(S) 1. [linked} 9G-PDI-PL20160000404-Wolf Creek RPUD (PDF) 2. wolf-creek-Ordinance - 060217 (PDF) 3. Recorded CCPC Res 17-03 (PDF) 4. Legal Ad - Adenda ID # 3305 (PDF) 9.E Packet Pg. 348 06/27/2017 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.E Doc ID: 3305 Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2007-46, as amended, the Wolf Creek RPUD, to approve an insubstantial change to the PUD, to add a preserve exhibit that revises the preserve configuration for Parcels 3B and 9 only, and providing for an effective date. The subject property is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximately one-half mile west of Collier Boulevard, in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 189± acres. [PDI- PL20160000404] Meeting Date: 06/27/2017 Prepared by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 06/02/2017 4:04 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director - Planning and Zoning – Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 06/02/2017 4:04 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Division Reviewer Completed 06/05/2017 10:34 AM Growth Management Department James French Additional Reviewer Completed 06/06/2017 10:42 PM Growth Management Department Michael Bosi Level 2 Division Administrator Skipped 06/02/2017 8:34 AM County Attorney's Office Scott Stone Level 2 Attorney Review Completed 06/12/2017 1:42 PM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 06/12/2017 2:05 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A. Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 06/14/2017 10:40 AM Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Completed 06/16/2017 11:02 AM County Manager's Office Leo E. Ochs Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 06/16/2017 11:40 AM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 06/27/2017 9:00 AM 9.E Packet Pg. 349 9.E.2 Packet Pg. 350 Attachment: wolf-creek-Ordinance - 060217 (3305 : Wolf Creek PDI) 9.E.2 Packet Pg. 351 Attachment: wolf-creek-Ordinance - 060217 (3305 : Wolf Creek PDI) 9.E.2 Packet Pg. 352 Attachment: wolf-creek-Ordinance - 060217 (3305 : Wolf Creek PDI) 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 353 Attachment: Recorded CCPC Res 17-03 (3305 : Wolf Creek PDI) 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 354 Attachment: Recorded CCPC Res 17-03 (3305 : Wolf Creek PDI) 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 355 Attachment: Recorded CCPC Res 17-03 (3305 : Wolf Creek PDI) 9.E.3 Packet Pg. 356 Attachment: Recorded CCPC Res 17-03 (3305 : Wolf Creek PDI) 9.E.4 Packet Pg. 357 Attachment: Legal Ad - Adenda ID # 3305 (3305 : Wolf Creek PDI) AGENDA ITEM 9-G TO: FROM: HEARING DATE: SUBJECT: STAFF REPORT COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ZONING DIVISION - ZONING SERVICES SECTION CROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT JI.JNE I.20I7 PETITION NO: PDI-PL20160000404 - WOLF CREEK APPLICANT: Sobel Vanderbilt. LLC. 2385 NW Executive Dr., Suite 370 Boca Raton, FL 3343 I AGENT: James Can, Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, lnc. 7400 Trail Blvd., Suire 200 Naples, FL 34108 R-EOUESTED ACTION: The applicant is asking the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) to consider an insubstantial change to the Wolf Creek RPUD, Ordinance No. 2007-46, as amended, to add a preserve exhibit thai revises the preserve configuration for Parcels 38 and 9 only. This pUD consists of lg9+ u"r... GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located on the north side of Vanderbilt Beach Road, approximarely one-half mile west of Collier Boulevard, in Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Colliir County, Florida. (See page 2). The purpose of this petition is to request an amendment to the existing wolf creek pUD. reconfiguring the existing preserves on Parcels 38 and 9. while still meerine the Code minimum requiremenl for presen es for the entire PUD (See proposed Master plan on pugi 3). Wolf Creek PDI-PL2o160000404 June 1, 2017 CCPC Public Hearing Page 1 of 13 - o-o o,C.E oN o.o =c .o (oooJ Wolf Creek POI-PL201 6000M04 June 1,2017 CCPC Public Hearing Page 2 ol '13 I . 1 -- 1| ,3 i I t ! ,,ulrliiiiii;, cTl raQJ3qw^ l:t&s ..rrElHX3onJU xtim, {pa iliiil I iiririiirlIIt . li! t.riiiiiI- !9r:: !i 6Etil ll ti!li !iiiElr 3ii!!ii ii ii!ll lr il; ,li!t'i ,'i!i,'i!i !. r!l iIlii ilt- rriiri EEE[8;ia4rl9 EEE936 ir "i!iliii 2t9; Hi I t. ,.,-:e Ei "-' d -s; fr E:li I B !ffli i,,,r 5il5 !!i! a iiii lir Proposed Amended Preserve Master plan Wolf CGak PDI-PL2o1600001104 June 1.2017 CCPC Public Hesring Page 3 of 13 -I 3tP HISTORY In 2003, the Board approved rhe wolf Creek PUD for 147.69-acres, changing the land use from Agriculture (A-2) to a residential PUD with a maximum density of 591 units, which is four dwelling units per acre (DU/AC) and preserving 27.4 acres ofon-site native vegelation. In 2007, this ordinance was repealed by Ordinance 07-46 and 2O.27 acres was added to the new Wolf Creek RPUD totaling 167.96 acres with a maximum density of 671 units, (which is 3.99 DU/AC). The requirement for preservation increased to 32.32 acres ofon-site narive vegetation (See Master plan below). Subject Area Wolf Creek P0l-PL20160000404 June '1,2017 CCPC Publrc Heanng -l(- rlt T Tlr lr l, a-t liil;,rir 2007 PUD Master Plan Page 4 of 13 In 2013, this PUD was amended by Ordinance l3-37 adding an additional five acres of land zoned RMF-6 and I6 acres of land zoned Palermo Cove PUD. The Wolf Creek PUD now had a land roral of lE8.7E acres with a maximum density of 3.99 DU/AC acres (maximum density 754 unrts). The preservation requirement for native vegetation again increased to 34.26 acres (See PUD Master Plan below and on pages 6 and 7), which is the current minimum preserve requiremenr for the PUD. However, per Note I "All shaded areas ofthe PUD will remain as approved by ordinance No. 07-46, Exhibit A, and Ordinance No.09-34." Lots 38 and 9 are shaded areas. E ? Iq !st I E v JI; aE sE E Itl :l I ii;itt ::l ill Master Plan - Page I of 3 (Additional acrcage in yellow) Wor Cr!.k PDI-PL2o1 60000404 Jun€ 1,2017 CCPC Pubtic Hearing Page 5 of 13 fi <D-z_- tri iTI t- rl ilL t & E r' Iil ,l ii t; ! I I -- i =3!ig I II,riil ; Itt; III Y q ili I E III tr Wolt Cr€€k PDI-PL201 60000404 June .|,2017 CCPC Public Hsanng -I!iiiiilrii iEiIT?iE E'IiEili EiiE giiE i g,i !b itE $ 3.IIE E iiEtiiis Eg.tf;'-7oBirt!HII i!I I x I ir,, ;r ili tIi iIL*,il ll lr ri 955 ; _. -:. O JJ)(, oooO (lGE o ato.(l Ed O l,1d. :uJzo. )zt ig !-rl ri!illil,,iilii It-.1 !liIIi 'rilii i _t I I I I I ! rIli-t: =EE;{Y i, EII Iir ;Iffi EIIItd rl ti I I i1rl Ii irIil Page 6 of 'l3 Master Plan - Page 2 of 3 E <1 I I I I I I I I 'liiliiii -\ l tI ? I i T 6 B11 'E*Ear6<;ilE iESI 8IEI iSrt iiFi 3 Ei;g.Yt SEiE rliE EE!E>.,61 gtii 5;Br i43: itEE is:s ;3PE EEiI Hilr"6 1q[311El c 3ii t5g:U i $c :fiEi!it;;iii u r rli- : qe I I sEiI IE: ;IF :if;E,E,EE[ fl:ifliiiiErirliHr iliiiiiliiiii iiiiiiiiiritiii ii;iiEiiiqEEiE iiiiiiiiiiiiiii t,i 5! $ a 3 It E E EIirl Ec,er5t 3 & itl :II iEE!tn lil Wolt Creek POI-P120160000404 June 1, 2017 CCPC Pubtic Heaflng Page 7 of 13 Master Plan - Page 3of 3 Aerial Photo (Subject site in yellow) SURROUNDING LAI{D USE & ZONINGI North: Single family homes with a zoning designation of Palermo Cove RPUD and a Comcast utility with a zoning designation of Agriculrure (A). East: SelfStorage and vacant property with a zoning desigrration of Carolina Village, commercial strip center with a zoning designation of Mission Hills PUD, and vacant property with a zoning designation of Sonoma Oaks MPUD. South: vanderbilt Beach Road, single family homes wirh a zoning designation of Estates (E). West: Single family homes with a zoning designarion of lslandwalk pUD. There are three types of changes to a PUD Ordinance: substantial, insubstanlial, and minor. An rnsubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or minor change. An insubstantial change to an approved pUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.l. The criteria and response to each criterion are listed below as follows: Wolf Creek PDI-PL2o1 60000404 June 1,20'17 CCPC Pubtic Heering Page 8 of 13 d. SECTtON r0.02.13.E.t f. ls there a proposed change in the boundary of the planned Unit Development (pUD)? No. There is no proposed change to the boundary ofthe PUD. Is there e proposed increase in the totrl number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development? No increase is proposed for the total number of dwelling units, intensiry of land uses, or height of buildings within the development. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recrestion, or open spsce areas within the development more than five (5) percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five (5) ecres in area? No. The applicant is continuing to propose 34.26 acres ofpreserve in this reconfiguration. No decrease in overall preserve area has been proposed. However, the visual depiction of the preserves for Parcels 38 and 9 on the 2007 PUD Master Plan is revised to show the remaining portion olthe PUD's minimum presene requirement of 3.06 acres. ls ihere a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (ercluding preservation, conservation or open spece), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? No. ls there r substential increrse in the impacts ofthe development which may include, but are not limited to increeses in trallic generation; changes in traffic circulation: or impacts on other public facilities? No. This application is for reconfiguration ofthe required preserves only. will the change result in land use activities thst generate a higher levet of vehiculertralfic based upon the Trip Generation Mrnual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? No. This application is for reconfiguration of the required preserves only. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? fo. The proposed changes would not increase storrnwater retention or stormwater discharge lrom that u'hich was already conremplated. The applicant will be required to submit ill appropriate information to SFWMD should this change necessitare modifications ro the permitted stormwater management system_ Wolf Creek PDI-P120160000404 June 1, 2017 CCPC Pubtc Hearing Page I of 13 h.will the proposed chrnge bring rbout r relationship to 8n sbutting land use that would be incompetible with an adjscent land use? No. Although the visual depiction on the 2007 Master plan will decrease for parcels 3B and 9 by approximately 4 acres, 3.06 acres of preserve area remains. Are there modifications to the PUD Master Plen or PUD Document or Amendment to I PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future L8nd Use Element or other elements of the Growth Manrgement Plen or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? No. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated rs a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and approved pursurnt to chapter 3t0.06. Floridr ststutes, wheri such change requires a determination end public hearing by collier county pursurnt to sec. 3t0.06 (19). F.S. Any chenge that meets the crirerion of Sec. 3t0.06 (19)9e)2., F.S., and any changes to e DRI/PUD Master Plan that clearly do not creste a substantirl devietion shell be reviewed and approved by Collier County under Sec.2.7.3.5.4 or Sec. 2.7.3.5.6 of this Code. No. J Wolf Creek PD l-PL20160000404 June 1.2017 CCPC Pubtrc Heanng Page 10 of 13 I r! IE ff i k. Are there any modificetions to the puD Master plan or pUD Document or Amendmentto s PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modilicstion as described under Section(s) 10.02.t3 E.? No. Wolf Creek PDI-PL201 6000M04 June 1.2017 CCPC Pubtic Hearing Approval by the Planning Commission shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application and action should be taken at a regularly scheduled meeting. SECTION 10.02.13.E.2 Does this petition change the Enalysis of the findings gnd criterie used for the original applicetion? No. The proposed Master Plan has an equivalenl amount of acreage as the original Master Plan for preservation area (See Attachment 3 and below, taken from qIJDZA-20120000650 Findings). Conserverion and Coustal Management Element (CCME): Environmental ret,ieu.sra./l .fbund this project to be (.onsistent with the Consen atirsn & Coostal Management Elcment (CCME). A minimum of 25 %o ofthe eristing ndtive vegetarion shatt he-placed ruuler prese,t'ation and dedicated to Collier counn. The minimum preservc rcqiired of J4.]6 acre.s is heing prorided. This meets rhe GMP requirement Environntental Review; The existing ll'oll'Creek PL|D preserve area is j2._12+ ucres: the proposed preserve area is 34.26+ otres ,4 total of 1.94 acres will be added: 154+ acres from Palermo Cove PUD ond 0.40' acres.[r'om the S-acre scenic lvoods parcel. The minimum preserue required of 34.)6 acrcs i.s hcing provided Conservation atrd Corstf,l Manegemert Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this projecr to be consistenl with the conservarion & coastal Management Element (acME). A minimum of 25 percent of the existing native vegetation shall be placed under preservation and dedicated to Collier County. The minimum preserve requirement of 34.26 acres is being provided. This does NOT require EAC REVIEW. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition to address environmental concerns. The minimum preserve requirement of 34.26 acres is continuing to be provided. With this petirion, the applicant is proposing to remove approximately 4.05 acres of the priserve from "Parcel 9" shown on the existing PUD Master Plan, because the minimum preserve requirement for the pUD has been met elsewhere in the PUD (See Preserve Map, page 5). The preserve standards in LDC section 3.05.07.H.1.b. states that, "Thin linear and perimerer .picture frame-shaped' preserves are discouraged, unless such preserve shapes are dictated ty environmental atory considerations." The requested reduction in preserve results in a ponion inear' The LDC requires an average of 50 feer in width bur not less than 20 serve boundary provides approximately 75 feet at its narrowest point Page I1 of 13 [Note: The LDC does nor prohibir changing preserve locations on a pUD Master plan if thepreservation criteria (LDC section 3.05.07.A.) and preserve srandards (LDC section 3.05.07.H.) are metl TRANSPORTATION R.EVIEW: Transportation stalT has reviewed the petition and the PUD Documents and approves this requesr. There are no new accesses or units proposed that would impacr transportation. on November 10, 2016, a Neighborhood lnformarion Meeting (NIM) was conducred. Concems were raised regarding traffic congestion, wildlife habitat, quality of the proposed development, and commitments not met by developers and the County. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Anomey's Office reviewed this staff report on March 26,2017 . STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Collier County planning commission (CCpc) approve petition pDI- PL2016000M04 Wolf Creek PDI for the reconfiguration of pan of the exisring-preserve per the plan with the following condirions: I . A new preservation Master Plan Exhibit shall be created showing the preserves accurately for rhe toul PUD. Attachments: I 2 J 4 5 6 7 t Wolf Creek PDI-PL20160000404 June 1. 2017 CCPC Pubtic Hearing CCPC Resolution PUD Exhibits Existing PUD Ordinance 2013 PUDZA Findings Comprehensive Planning Consistency Revierl. E-mails Petition Against Reduction of Preserve Application and Backup Material Page 12 of 13 PREPARED B}': zP4 DAN SMITH. AICP. PRINCIPAL PLANNER ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: --ruP< MICHAEL BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR ZONING DIVISION JAMIE FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Woff Creek PDI-PL20160000404 June 1, 2017 CCPC Public Hearing J- t) - l) DATE DATE f . t>- t') DATE S -tz -t'7 DATE . BELLOWS, ZONINC MANAGER Page 'l 3 ol '13 A RESOLUTION OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNTNG COMMISSION FOR AN INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO THE WOLF CREEK RPUD, ORDINANCE NO.2007.46, AS AMENDED, TO ADD A PRESERVE EXHIBIT THAT REVISES THE PRESERVE CONFIGURATION FOR PARCELS 38 AND 9 ONLY, FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF VANDERBTLT BEACH ROAD, APPROXIMATELY ONE-HALF MILE WEST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD, IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 4t SOI.ITH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, coNstsTtNG oF tE}} ACRES. lpDt-pl-20r6flm0{041 WHEREAS. the Legislature ol'the State of Florida in Chapter 125. Florida Sr,arures. has conlerred on all counties in Florida lhe po\.!er to establish. coordinate and enlbrce zoning anrl such business regulations as zre necessary for the prorecrion ofthe public: and WHEREAS. the County- pursuanr therero has adopted a [.and Development Code (Ordinance No. 0441. as amended) which esrablishes regularions lor the zoning of particular geographic divisions ol'lhe Counr).: and WHEREAS. rhe Collier Counry Planning commission is aurhorized bl rhe Board of County Commissiones lo grant insubstantial changes to PUD Ordinances in accordance with Subst'ction 10.02.13.E.2 of the Land Developmenr Code: and WHEREAS. the Collier counry Planning commission. being the duh appoinred planning agency tbr the area herebl affected. has held a properll noticed public hearing and has considered the advisability of the requested insubstantial change to add a preserre exliibit thar revises the preserve configuration for Parcels 38 and 9 onl1. as shown on Exhibit A. for the propenv hereinafter described. and has lbund as a matter ol'lact that satislactor) pror ision and arrangemenr have been made conceming all applicable matters required by said regularions and in u..oid-". with Subsection 10.02.13.8.2 of the Collier Counrl. Land Developmenr Code: and WHEREAS. all inrerested panies have been given opponuniry to be heard bl rhis Commission in public meeting assembled and the Commission having considered all matters presented. NOW. THEREF'ORE. I]E IT RESOLVED BY THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. Ihat: Petition No. PDI-PL201600O0404 tiled hy James A. Can. p.E. of Agnoli. Barher & Brundage. lnc.. and R. Bruce Anderson. Esq.. on behalfof sobel Vanderbilr. t-l-c. wirh respecr ro the propeny described in ordinance No. 2007:16. as amended. the wolf creek Residenrial |loll ('reck RPL'D Perir un \ o P Dl- P L:0 I 6N)00J0J ll6-CPS{1556/ll04tl7,ll5l rer. 5/ l7i l7 I CCPC RESOLT TION \O. I7 - Attachment '1 Planned tJnit Developmenr. bc and rhe same is hereby approved ro add revises the preserve configuration for Parcels.lB and 9 onl1,. as shoun on to the condirions of appror:al arrached herero as Eshibit B. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED rhal rhis Resolurion be recorded Commission and filed with the Countv Clerk's Olfice. a preserve exhibit that Exhibil A. and subjecr in the minutes of this This Resolution adopted alrer motion. second and majority vote on the .2017 . da) ttl' A-fTEST: James French. Deputy Depanmenl Head Gror+th Management Depanment Approved as to form and legalitl : COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA Karen Homial. Vice- Chairman lLsf,zf,1 Scott A. Stone Assisranr Counry Anomel. Atlachment: Exhibil A - Preserve Exhibit for parcels -lB and 9 Exhibit B - Condirions of Approval ll'oll ('reel RpUD Pet itioa,\ o P Dl - P L?0 I 6Un0J0t I r6{PS4l 556/t 3o4tt7/ ll52 rcv. S, t1 / t1 rG.t-Y @ Patrt 2,:IE!; E:i!lrili 3l IEE3;iiil! I !EEitEiiiilsfiIIIig !i n!rii:";i*iiii;l"-;I ri -cx EiilEIi ii!i t:El fl'ii![il "'i iiai f;r:r:;i ; illiH Itrll'H i ,!IH ii'i td bi t ::':r E5 q:! ! >IE q "tt ! ,a! : mo: ;$- :s !tnba, !i: F!f t: r lEtit9I:!Er illEEixaooiitse irr'--,t;l i!c'!3 ri!i, iil;'!'!! EI:I : I : rl;l l! , lrirli liiirilli ilr:;tt:ilril PE!t rl i cl !!ii 8 Ir tl iiI i:l iii i!; EITiIr-3 liilr"i!ilr', ! I!i' o!>om2gt:?=3 ;9J6=-6!E;6* ae469i:IBI23 :;gElH ii*f;$; ECesff! iEifi*4rno rna2I ;i:iii lri', T.l Ilil :liir: I i!;: - wilr caeex npuo EXHlaIT 'P .'iEgEPVE EXHEIT fOR PARCETS JE Artlo 9 a-oaal u*ra*r,ar ala ,ru5 n !t €xEcirTrvE cEnrER oF sutTE.x0 8(lc-r Furcn rr 3tr3r - " .:;:i E c i i.; !, ( -- t 6 ".- iifliiilFr ' ti I J, L EXHIBIT B Conditions ol' Approval The sole purpose ol'the Preserve Exhibit for Parcels 3B and 9 is to revise the preserve configuration for Parcels 38 and 9 only. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. Pursuant to Section 125.022(5) F.S.. issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the pan ofthe applicant to obtain a permit from a state or lederal agency and does not creale any liability on the pan of the county for issuance ofthe permit ifthe applicanr fails ro obtain rcquisite approvals or fulfill rhe obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that resuk in a violation of state or federal law. ll6-CPS-01556/1330966t11 Revised 5/3/17 Words stnrelehreugh are delered; words underlined are added. PL20160000404 Wolf Creek PUD Insubstantial Change to a PUD (PDI) Submittal Prepared By: PL20160000404 Application Review Fees PL20160000404 CD of PDI Submittal PL20160000404 Cover Letter And Response to Comments Letters 1 K:\2015\15-0106 - The Falls of Portofino\Correspondences\Documents\PDI (Wolf Creek PUD) - Submittal 3\Response to Comments Letter.docx August 31, 2016 VIA: HAND DELIVERED The Intake Team Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 RE: Wolf Creek RPUD (ABB PN 15-0106) – Submittal - 3 Insubstantial Change to PUD (PDI) PL20160000404 Dear Intake Team: This cover letter is in response to the County’s comments dated August 23, 2016 to our PDI application of the above referenced project. Responses to each comment are provided below, in bold blue and italic print. Please find the following items included in this resubmittal for your review: Attached are the following:  CD of Submittal - 2  Sixteen (16) Response to Comments Letter  Three (3) copies of the Preserve Allocation by Plat Exhibit (24 x 36 & 8 1/2 x 11 Reduced)  Three (3) copies of Revised List of Exhibits and Tables with Strike Thru/Underline  Three (3) copies of Revised Section 2.5 with Strike Thru/Underline Changes  Three (3) copies of Revised Section 4.1 with Strike Thru/Underline Changes  Three (3) copies of Exhibit “P” – Preserve Exhibit for Parcels 3B and 9 (24 x 36 & 8 1/2 x 11 Reduced) Rejected Review: Zoning Review Reviewed By: Daniel Smith Correction Comment 3: Miscellaneous Corrections Please show preserve acreage change and calculations in an exhibit. Rev. 2 Per meeting in Attorney's office on 8/22, as an exhibit, please show plat information, addressing preserves existing in meeting calculations. Please put information as an overlay on an aerial, showing existing and proposed. RESPONSE: Enclosed is a new informational exhibit “Preserve Allocation by Plat Exhibit” aerial overlay that illustrates all existing preserve areas with the corresponding Plat or Official Records Book recording information. This is not an exhibit to the PUD. 2 K:\2015\15-0106 - The Falls of Portofino\Correspondences\Documents\PDI (Wolf Creek PUD) - Submittal 3\Response to Comments Letter.docx Rejected Review: Landscape Review Reviewed By: Daniel Smith Correction Comment 1: Miscellaneous Corrections Either label the required perimeter buffers on the Master Plan or add a note that buffers per LDC requirements. Rev. 2 The buffers provided and notes on the Master Plan are not correct. Remove the buffer notes and the “no buffer required” citations on the Master Plan add a note that buffers will meet LDC requirement. Also add a note the preserves meet or exceed buffer requirements after exotic vegetation is removed. RESPONSE: The buffer notes referenced are on the RPUD Master Plan Exhibit A-1 from Ord. 13-37. This plan is not being modified as part of this application. Rejected Review: County Attorney Review Reviewed By: Scott Stone Correction Comment 3: It appears that you are adding a new exhibits to the PUD in order to clarify the exact amount of preserve area within Parcels 3B and 9. However, the exis ting Master Plan exhibits will still show the previously approved location/size of the preserve area on those parcels, thus creating an inconsistency between the exhibits. Rather than add a new exhibit, it would appear that the most appropriate solution to clarify the preserve location/size would be to amend the existing PUD Master Plan. RESPONSE: Only Parcels 3B and 9 preserve area are being modified on this application. Per meeting at the County Attorney Office, August 22, 2016, the Exhibit “P” plan will be remain and is now named “Preserve Exhibit for Parcels 3B and 9”. Correction Comment 4: On your proposed Preserve Master Plan, please add a label that clearly shows the area on the west side of Parcel 3B is part of Parcel 3A. RESPONSE: The parcel west of Parcel 3B is part of Parcel 3A, and is now labeled. This area is an existing 0.72 acre platted preserve within the Raffia Preserve Phase 1 plat. Correction Comment 5: Please provide an informational exhibit that depicts the location (and size) of all of the platted preserve areas outside of Parcels 3B and 9, within the PUD. RESPONSE: Enclosed is a new informational exhibit “Preserve Allocation by Plat Exhibit” aerial overlay that illustrates all existing preserve areas with the corresponding Plat or Official Records Book recording information. This is not an exhibit to the PUD. 3 K:\2015\15-0106 - The Falls of Portofino\Correspondences\Documents\PDI (Wolf Creek PUD) - Submittal 3\Response to Comments Letter.docx Correction Comment 6: You will also have to amend the PUD "List of Exhibits and Tables" to add Exhibit P. Please provide a strike-through/underline copy of that amended page. RESPONSE: Enclosed is a revised “List of Exhibits and Tables” with strike thru/underline changes. Correction Comment 7: Section 2.5 B states that Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "A-1" constitutes the required RPUD development plan. Based on that language, wouldn't you still have the same issue that you're attempting to resolve with this amendment--i.e., the Exhibit A Master Plan, which governs development of your property, will show the incorrect size of your preserve. It appears you may have to amend that language in order to add a reference to Exhibit "P." Please see Dan Smith/Ray Bellows to confirm. RESPONSE: Enclosed is a revised section 2.5 with strike thru/underline changes. Correction Comment 8: Section 4.1 of the PUD states that "The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for the Preserve Areas as shown on Exhibit "A," RPUD Master Plan and Exhibit "A-1", RPUD Master Plan Amended. It appears that you will have to amend this language to add a reference to Exhibit "P." RESPONSE: Enclosed is a revised section 4.1 with strike thru/underline changes. If you have any questions, you may reach me by telephone or email (carr@abbinc.com) Sincerely, AGNOLI, BARBER & BRUNDAGE, INC. James A. Carr, P.E. Project Manager/Principal JAC/jee Enclosures cc: R. Bruce Anderson, Attorney at Law PL20160000404 Project Narrative K:\2015\15-0106 - The Falls of Portofino\Correspondences\Documents\PDI (Wolf Creek PUD) - Submittal 2\Wolf Creek PUD Project Narrative-Revised.doc 1 Wolf Creek RPUD Insubstantial Change to a PUD Project Narrative July 18, 2016 The Wolf Creek Residential Planned Unit Development RPUD was approved May 14, 2013, as Ordinance 13- 37 (most recent PUDA). The RPUD Ord. 13-37 was an amendment to the previously amended Ord. 09-34 and Ord. 07-46 Wolf Creek RPUD. The RPUD Ord. 07-46 as approved May 22, 2007, included 168 acres of residential parcels for maximum 671 dwelling units. The RPUD Ord. 13-37 amendment increased the RPUD area to 189 acres by adding approximately 21 acres of adjacent lands and increasing the maximum dwelling units to 754 units. The minimum natural habitat preserve area increased from 32.32 acres to 34.26 acres. This RPUD is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), particularly Policy 5.4 and Policies 7.1 through 7.4. This development is a single-family residential use compatible with the surrounding uses in this RPUD and adjacent residentially zoned properties. The residential communities within this RPUD are interconnected by the recently constructed Pristine Drive and Wolfe Road, providing an internal access and loop road from the residential entrances to the adjacent collector roads Collier Boulevard and Vanderbilt Beach Road. A separate access road has been permitted and is currently being constructed to connect the Island Walk PUD to Pristine Drive. This access road is partially on this property within a dedicated access and drainage easement. Sidewalks are being provided on both sides of the internal streets of this development with connection to Pristine Drive sidewalks. The purpose of this RPUD Insubstantial Change application is to amend the RPUD Master Plan to provide a new RPUD Preserve Master Plan exhibit showing the proposed location and acreage of preserve within Parcels 3B and 9, and the total documented acreage for all preserves within the RPUD boundary. The most recent PUDA, Ord. 13-37 includes two Master Plans, Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “A -1” that graphically show the preserve areas but do not clearly identify their acreages. Exhibit “A” shows the original Wolf Creek RPUD Ord. 07-46 parcels (Parcels 1 through 9) including the preserve locations, with no individual acreages listed. Exhibit “A-1” as provided in Ord. 13-37 shows only parcels 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B and 3A; all other parcels were left unchanged. Preserve locations are shown on Parcels 1A, 2A and 3A and approximate areas are listed at the bottom of the exhibit. The total approximate area as listed is +/- 16.79 acres. The actual area provided per Plat Book recordings is 16.41 acres. The revised RPUD Preserve Master Plan, Exhibit “P” identifies the total 34.26 acres minimum required preserve area and the individual preserve acreages. The plan also shows a reduction to the preserve area on Parcels 3B and 9 (this preserve area was shown graphically on Exhibit “A”, but no acreage listed). There are no changes proposed to preserve areas and locations as previously approved on Parcels 1A, 2A, 3A, 4, 6, 7 and 8, as identified on Exhibit “A” and “A-1”. Exhibit “P” identifies the total documented 34.26 acres minimum required preserve area. Each preserve acreage was taken from the recorded Plats of the Black Bear Ridge and Raffia Preserve developments. The Falls of Portofino preserve is identified on the SDP-2005-AR-7064 and the Conservation Easement as recorded in Official Records Book 3973, Pages 2911-2927 of the public records of Collier County. The remaining minimum native vegetation preserve area is identified as 3.06 acres and proposed on Parcel 9 of the RPUD. The total preserve areas are tabulated on the Preserve Master Plan identifying the total 34.26 acres provided. The proposed lakes on Parcel 3B and Parcel 9 are rotated to be consistent with the proposed development order application being processed simultaneously with this PDI application. There are no changes proposed to the PUD document text and there are no changes proposed to lands owned by others. All other parcels are shaded gray and noted “to remain as approved by Ordinance 13-37, 07-46 and 09-34”. PL20160000404 Detail of Request 1 Wolf Creek RPUD Insubstantial Change to a PUD Detail of Request July 18, 2016 The purpose of this RPUD Insubstantial Change application is to amend the RPUD Master Plan to provide a new RPUD Preserve Master Plan exhibit showing the proposed location and acreage of preserve within Parcels 3B and 9, and the total acreage for all preserves within the RPUD boundary. The most recent PUDA, Ord. 13-37 includes two Master Plans, Exhibit “A” and Exhibit “A-1” that graphically show the preserve areas but do not clearly identify their acreages. The revised RPUD Preserve Master Plan, Exhibit “P” identifies the total 34.26 acres minimum required preserve area and the individual preserve acreages. The plan also shows a reduction to the preserve area on Parcels 3B and 9 (this area was shown graphically on Exhibit “A”, but no acreage listed). There are no changes proposed to preserve areas and locations as previously approved on Parcels 1A, 2A, 3A, 4, 6, 7 and 8, as identified on Exhibit “A” and “A-1”. The proposed Master Plan Change does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria in LDC subsection 10.02.13.E.1. There is no change to the PUD boundary, no increase in dwelling units or intensity, no decrease in the preservation or conservation areas within the development (the 34.26 acres minimum stated in the RPUD is being maintained), no increase of areas used for nonresidential uses, no increase in the impacts of the development such as traffic generation and public facilities (the maximum 754 dwelling units does not change), no increase to storm water discharges (PUD boundary and allowable discharge rate does not change), no change to a boundary abutting an adjacent land use, and no change to the FLUE or GMP or increase in density or intensity of permitted land uses. This PUD is not a Development of Regional Impact (DRI). PL20160000404 PDI Application PL20160000404 Pre-Application Meeting Notes PL20160000404 Current Master Plan GradyMinor Civil Engineers Ɣ Land Surveyors Ɣ Planners Ɣ Landscape Architects CERT. OF AUTH. EB 0005151 CERT. OF AUTH. LB 0005151 BUSINESS LC 26000266 Bonita Springs 239.947.1144 Fort Myers 239.690.4380 www.GradyMinor.com Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. NO CHANGES PROPOSED PRESERVES:PARCEL 1A = 6.19+/- ACRES PARCEL 2A = 9.9+/- ACRES PARCEL 3A = 0.7+/- ACRES NOTES 1.ALL SHADED AREAS OF THE PUD WILL REMAIN AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE NUMBER 07-46, EXHIBIT "A" AND ORDINANCE 09-34. 2.ALL PRESERVES AND LAKES IN SHADED AREAS WILL REMAIN AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN ORDINANCE 07-46, EXHIBIT "A" AND ORDINANCE 09-34. 3.THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 4.ALL ACREAGES (EXCEPT FOR PRESERVES) ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AT THE TIME OF SDP OR PLAT APPROVAL. GradyMinor Civil Engineers Ɣ Land Surveyors Ɣ Planners Ɣ Landscape Architects CERT. OF AUTH. EB 0005151 CERT. OF AUTH. LB 0005151 BUSINESS LC 26000266 Bonita Springs 239.947.1144 Fort Myers 239.690.4380 www.GradyMinor.com Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. NO CHANGES PROPOSED PRESERVES:PARCEL 1A = 6.19+/- ACRES PARCEL 2A = 9.9+/- ACRES PARCEL 3A = 0.7+/- ACRES NOTES 1.ALL SHADED AREAS OF THE PUD WILL REMAIN AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE NUMBER 07-46, EXHIBIT "A" AND ORDINANCE 09-34. 2.ALL PRESERVES AND LAKES IN SHADED AREAS WILL REMAIN AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN ORDINANCE 07-46, EXHIBIT "A" AND ORDINANCE 09-34. 3.THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 4.ALL ACREAGES (EXCEPT FOR PRESERVES) ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AT THE TIME OF SDP OR PLAT APPROVAL. GradyMinor Civil Engineers Ɣ Land Surveyors Ɣ Planners Ɣ Landscape Architects CERT. OF AUTH. EB 0005151 CERT. OF AUTH. LB 0005151 BUSINESS LC 26000266 Bonita Springs 239.947.1144 Fort Myers 239.690.4380 www.GradyMinor.com Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. NOTES 1.ALL SHADED AREAS OF THE PUD WILL REMAIN AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE NUMBER 07-46, EXHIBIT "A" AND ORDINANCE 09-34. 2.ALL PRESERVES AND LAKES IN SHADED AREAS WILL REMAIN AS SHOWN AND APPROVED IN ORDINANCE 07-46, EXHIBIT "A" AND ORDINANCE 09-34. 3.THIS PLAN IS CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE AND IS SUBJECT TO MINOR MODIFICATION DUE TO AGENCY PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS. 4.ALL ACREAGES (EXCEPT FOR PRESERVES) ARE APPROXIMATE AND SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION AT THE TIME OF SDP OR PLAT APPROVAL. PRESERVES ORIGINAL WOLF CREEK PUD NATIVE VEGETATION PRESERVATION REQUIREMENT = 32.32 AC PLUS AREAS BEING ADDED TO PUD: PARCEL 1A: $5($ $& 5(48,5('35(6(59( $&2)$&5(62)1$7,9(9(*(7$7,21 PARCEL 2B: $5($ $& 5(48,5('35(6(59( $&2)$&2)1$7,9(9(*(7$7,21 727$/35(6(59(5(48,5(' $&$&$& 34.26 AC TOTAL MINIMUM PRESERVE PROVIDED = 34.26 AC SITE DATA TOTAL SITE AREA:$& MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS:$&;'8$ LIST OF DEVIATIONS FROM L.D.C. (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 07-46) DEVIATION #1 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 5.06.02A6 THAT REQUIRES ON-PREMISES SIGNS WITHIN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS TO MAINTAIN A TEN-FOOT SETBACK FROM ANY PROPERTY LINE UNLESS PLACED ON A FENCE OR WALL TO ALLOW A ZERO (0) FOOT SETBACK FROM THE PROPERTY LINE SHARED WITH THE CAROLINA VILLAGE MIXED USE PUD. THIS DEVIATION WILL PERMIT APPROXIMATELY HALF, OF ONE DOUBLE-FACED IN A MEDIAN IN THE ROAD BETWEEN THE WOLF CREEK RESIDENTIAL PUD (LABELED PRISTINE DRIVE ON EXHIBIT "A") AND THE CAROLINA VILLAGE MIXED USE PUD AND ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE CAROLINA VILLAGE PROPERTY LINE AND TO REDUCE THE MINIMUM 10-FOOT SETBACK FROM THE NEIGHBORING CAROLINA VILLAGE MIXED USE PUD TO 0 FEET WITH THE ADVERTISING LIMITED EXCLUSIVELY TO NO MORE THAN 3 RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE WOLF CREEK RESIDENTIAL PUD. THE PROPOSED SIGN MUST MEET ALL VEHICULAR SAFETY SIGHT DISTANCE STANDARDS FOR COLLIER COUNTY AND HAVE A MINIMUM 10-FOOT SETBACK FROM THE VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 5.06.02A.6.A OF THE LDC. THE PROPOSED SIGN MUST BE EXTERNALLY LIGHTED AND NOT INTERNALLY LIGHTED. LIST OF DEVIATIONS FROM L.D.C. (PARCELS 1A - 3A ONLY) DEVIATION #2 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 4.06.02 OF THE, BUFFER REQUIREMENTS, WHICH REQUIRES A 10 FOOT WIDE TYPE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER BETWEEN SIMILAR RESIDENTIAL LAND USES TO ALLOW NO BUFFER BETWEEN COMMONLY OWNED PROPERTIES WHERE INDICATED ON THE CONCEPTUAL MASTER PLAN. DEVIATION #3 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.02.A.2, SIDEWALKS, BIKE LANE AND PATHWAY REQUIREMENTS, WHICH REQUIRES SIDEWALKS TO BE CONSTRUCTED ON BOTH SIDES OF LOCAL STREETS, TO ALLOW SIDEWALKS ON ONE SIDE OF THE STREET ONLY FOR PRIVATE STREETS WHERE IDENTIFIED ON THE ALTERNATIVE PATHWAYS PLAN (SEE EXHIBIT D OF THE PUD EXHIBITS). DEVIATION #4 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.01.O, STREET SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS AND APPENDIX B, TYPICAL STREET SECTIONS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY DESIGN STANDARDS, WHICH ESTABLISHES A 60 FOOT WIDE LOCAL ROAD TO ALLOW A MINIMUM 40' WIDE PRIVATE LOCAL ROAD. (SEE EXHIBIT C OF THE PUD EXHIBITS). DEVIATION #5 SEEKS RELIEF FROM LDC SECTION 6.06.01.J, STREET SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS, WHICH LIMITS CUL-DE-SACS TO A MAXIMUM LENGTH OF 1,000 FEET TO PERMIT A CUL-DE-SAC APPROXIMATELY 1,300 FEET IN LENGTH WITH APPROPRIATE NO THROUGH TRAFFIC SIGNAGE. PL20160000404 Environmental Supplement ➢ Listed Species Management Plan ➢ Preserve Maintenance and Monitoring Plan ➢ Protected Species Survey ➢ Department of Historical Resources Letter Listed Species Management Plan Preserve Maintenance and Monitoring Plan Protected Species Survey Department of Historical Resources Letter RICK SCOTT Governor KEN DETZNER Secretary of State Division of Historical Resources R.A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street• Tallahassee, Florida 32399 850.245.6300 • 850.245.6436 (Fax) FLHeritage.com Kimberly Schlachta, CSE, President May 2, 2016 Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc. 11000 Metro Parkway, Suite 4 Fort Myers, FL 33966 RE: DHR Project File No.: 2016-01349, Received by DHR: March 30, 2016 / County: Collier Application No.: 2016-1 / Applicant: Boylan Environmental Consultants, Inc Application: Due Diligence Review in Anticipation of Possible State Permit Application Project: Falls of Portofino Phase 2, Naples, FL / Property Owner: Portofino Falls Builders, Inc. Dear Ms. Schlachta: Our office reviewed the referenced project in accordance with Chapters 267.061 and 373.414, Florida Statutes, and implementing state regulations, for possible effects on historic properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places, or otherwise of historical, architectural or archaeological value. Based on the information provided, it is the opinion of this office that the proposed project is unlikely to adversely affect historic properties. However, since unexpected finds may occur during ground disturbing activities, we request that the applicant has a plan in place in the event of inadvertent cultural resource discoveries:  If prehistoric or historic artifacts, such as pottery or ceramics, projectile points, dugout canoes, metal implements, historic building materials, or any other physical remains that could be associated with Native American, early European, or American settlement are encountered at any time within the project site area, the permitted project shall cease all activities involving subsurface disturbance in the vicinity of the discovery. The applicant shall contact the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources, Compliance Review Section at (850)-245-6333. Project activities shall not resume without verbal and/or written authorization. In the event that unmarked human remains are encountered during permitted activities, all work shall stop immediately and the proper authorities notified in accordance with Section 872.05, Florida Statutes. If you have any questions, please contact Florence McCullough, M.A., RPA, Historic Sites Specialist, by email at Florence.McCullough@dos.myflorida.com, or by telephone at 850.245.6333 or 800.847.7278. Sincerely Timothy A. Parsons, Ph.D., Director, Division of Historical Resources, and State Historic Preservation Officer PL20160000404 Revised Master Plan PARCEL 1A(FORMERLY PART OF PALERMO RPUD) 15.77 ACRESRESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY)TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BYORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34PARCEL 3B12.00 ACRESRESIDENTIAL AREA(SINGLE, TWO, MULTI-FAMILY ORATTACHED TOWN HOUSES)PROPOSED LAKE RESIDENTIAL AREA(SINGLE, TWO, MULTI-FAMILY ORATTACHED TOWN HOUSES)PARCEL 420.27 ACRESRESIDENTIAL AREA(SINGLE, TWO, MULTI-FAMILY ORATTACHED TOWN HOUSES)TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BYORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34PRESERVE AREA3.06 ACRESVANDERBILT BEACH ROADVANDERBILT BEACH ROADBUCKSTONE DRIVEVANDERBILT COMMONS MPUDOFFICE/SPECIALTY RETAILVANDERBILT WAYPRISTINE DRIVEPARCEL 920.27 ACRESZONED: AEXISTINGCOMCASTFACILITY(NOT PARTOF PUD)SONOMA LAKES PUDRESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIALPALERMO COVE RPUDRESIDENTIALPALERMO COVE RPUDRESIDENTIALMISSION HILLS PUDCOMMERCIALSHOPPING CENTERPALERMO COVE RPUDRESIDENTIALWOLFE RD.PROPOSEDLAKEPARCEL 1B(FORMERLY PARCEL 1) 20.29 ACRESRESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY)TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BYORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34PARCEL 2A(FORMERLY PARCEL 2) 20.28 ACRESRESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY)TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BYORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34PARCEL 3A8.27 ACRESRESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY)TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BYORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34PARCEL 2B5.08 ACRESRESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY)TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BYORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34PARCEL 810.14 ACRESRESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLEFAMILY)TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BYORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND09-34PARCEL 720.27 ACRESRESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY)TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BYORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34PARCEL 620.27 ACRESRESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY)TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BYORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34PARCEL 515.90 ACRESRESIDENTIAL AREA(SINGLE, TWO, MULTI-FAMILY ORATTACHED TOWN HOUSES)TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BYORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34PRISTINE DRIVEISLAND WALK PUD GATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY MISSION HILLS DRIVEWOLF CREEK RPUDBOUNDARYPARCEL 3A ACCESS EASEMENT(O.R. 4655, PG. 1763)ISLAND WALK PUD GATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ISLAND WALK PUDGATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITYISLAND WALK PUDGATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITYPALERMO COVE RPUDRESIDENTIALPARCEL 1A24x36 SCALE: 1" = 200'AGNOLIBARBER&BRUNDAG E ,I N C.2001000200NCLIENT NAME:PROJECT NAME:CHECKED BY: JACREVIEWED BY: ABBHORIZ. SCALE: 1" = 200'VERT. SCALE: N/A DRAWING TITLE:1SHEETOFAcad File #ACAD FILE NAME:ABB PROJECT #PLOT VIEW \ LAYOUTPUD Exhibit11503_pud15-01061REVISION:DESIGN BY: ABBDRAWN BY: RAFWOLF CREEK RPUD EXHIBIT "P"DATE: APRIL 2016SUITE 440 SOBEL VANDERBILT, LLC BOCA RATON, FL 33431 2385 N.W. EXECUTIVE CENTER DR., PRESERVE EXHIBIT FOR PARCELS 3B AND 911503_pud - Rev 1Matchline - AMatchline - AWOLF CREEK RPUD TOTAL PRESERVE AREASRAFFIA PRESERVE 16.41(PARCELS 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A)RAFFIA PRESERVE - PHASE 1, PLAT BOOK 54 PGS 72-83TRACTS P-1,P-2,P-6 & P-7A PORTION OF TRACT P-11.54TRACT P-24.21TRACT P-69.94TRACT P-70.7216.41 AC.BLACK BEAR RIDGE 9.11(PARCELS 6, 7, 8)BLACK BEAR RIDGE - PHASE 1, PLAT BOOK 43 PGS 89-92TRACTS P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4A, P-4BBLACK BEAR RIDGE - PHASE 2, PLAT BOOK 47 PGS 40-42TRACT P-1TRACT P-10.244TRACT P-20.702TRACT P-30.22TRACT P-4A5.36TRACT P-4B0.246TRACT P-1 (PHASE 2)2.3429.11 AC.FALLS OF PORTOFINO 5.68(PARCELS 4, 5)SDP-2005-AR-7064O.R. BOOK 3973, PGS 2911-2927VANDERBILT RESERVE3.06(PARCELS 3B, 9)PROPOSED PLAT_____________________________________________TOTAL 34.26 AC.1 07-8-16 REVISE PER COUNTY REVIEW NO CHANGES PROPOSEDPRESERVE AREANOTE: REQUIRED PERIMETER BUFFERS ON PARCEL 3BAND 9 ARE PER PUD/LDC REQUIREMENTS.NOTE: PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPEBUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVALIN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTIONS 4.06.02 AND 4.06.05.E.1.SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT MATERIALSSHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07.NOTE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PRESERVEEXHIBIT IS TO REVISE THE PRESERVECONFIGURATION IN PARCELS 3B AND 9 ONLY.ALL OTHER ASPECTS OF THE PUD MASTERPLAN SHALL REMAIN AS APPROVED BYORDINANCE NO. 13-37, 09-34, AND 07-46.2 03-29-17 REVISE PRESERVE NOTE PARCEL 1A (FORMERLY PART OF PALERMO RPUD) 15.77 ACRES RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY) TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34 PALERMO COVE RPUD RESIDENTIAL PARCEL 1B (FORMERLY PARCEL 1) 20.29 ACRES RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY) TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34ISLAND WALK PUDGATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITYISLAND WALK PUDGATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITYPALERMO COVE RPUD RESIDENTIAL PARCEL 1A Matchline - A Matchline - A NO CHANGES PROPOSED PRESERVE AREA WOLF CREEK RPUD TOTAL PRESERVE AREAS RAFFIA PRESERVE 16.41 (PARCELS 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A) RAFFIA PRESERVE - PHASE 1, PLAT BOOK 54 PGS 72-83 TRACTS P-1,P-2,P-6 & P-7 A PORTION OF TRACT P-1 1.54 TRACT P-2 4.21 TRACT P-6 9.94 TRACT P-7 0.72 16.41 AC. BLACK BEAR RIDGE 9.11 (PARCELS 6, 7, 8) BLACK BEAR RIDGE - PHASE 1, PLAT BOOK 43 PGS 89-92 TRACTS P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4A, P-4B BLACK BEAR RIDGE - PHASE 2, PLAT BOOK 47 PGS 40-42 TRACT P-1 TRACT P-1 0.244 TRACT P-2 0.702 TRACT P-3 0.22 TRACT P-4A 5.36 TRACT P-4B 0.246 TRACT P-1 (PHASE 2)2.342 9.11 AC. FALLS OF PORTOFINO 5.68 (PARCELS 4, 5) SDP-2005-AR-7064 O.R. BOOK 3973, PGS 2911-2927 VANDERBILT RESERVE 3.06 (PARCELS 3B, 9) PROPOSED PLAT _____________________________________________ TOTAL 34.26 AC. NOTE: REQUIRED PERIMETER BUFFERS ON PARCEL 3B AND 9 ARE PER PUD/LDC REQUIREMENTS. NOTE: PRESERVES MAY BE USED TO SATISFY THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS AFTER EXOTIC VEGETATION REMOVAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTIONS 4.06.02 AND 4.06.05.E.1. SUPPLEMENTAL PLANTINGS WITH NATIVE PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH LDC SECTION 3.05.07. PARCEL 3B 12.00 ACRES RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE, TWO, MULTI-FAMILY OR ATTACHED TOWN HOUSES)PROPOSED LAKERESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE, TWO, MULTI-FAMILY OR ATTACHED TOWN HOUSES) PARCEL 4 20.27 ACRES RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE, TWO, MULTI-FAMILY OR ATTACHED TOWN HOUSES) TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34 PRESERVE AREA 3.06 ACRES VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD BUCKSTONE DRIVEVANDERBILT COMMONS MPUD OFFICE/SPECIALTY RETAIL VANDERBILT WAYPRISTINE DRIVEPARCEL 9 20.27 ACRES ZONED: A EXISTING COMCAST FACILITY (NOT PART OF PUD) SONOMA LAKES PUD RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL PALERMO COVE RPUD RESIDENTIAL PALERMO COVE RPUD RESIDENTIAL MISSION HILLS PUD COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER WOLFE RD. PROPOSED LAKE PARCEL 2A (FORMERLY PARCEL 2) 20.28 ACRES RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY) TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34 PARCEL 3A 8.27 ACRES RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY) TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34 PARCEL 2B 5.08 ACRES RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY) TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34 PARCEL 8 10.14 ACRES RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY) TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34 PARCEL 7 20.27 ACRES RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY) TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34 PARCEL 6 20.27 ACRES RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY) TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34 PARCEL 5 15.90 ACRES RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE, TWO, MULTI-FAMILY OR ATTACHED TOWN HOUSES) TO REMAIN AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE 13-37, 07-46 AND 09-34 PRISTINE DRIVEISLAND WALK PUDGATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITYMISSION HILLS DRIVE WOLF CREEK RPUD BOUNDARYPARCEL 3AACCESS EASEMENT (O.R. 4655, PG. 1763)ISLAND WALK PUDGATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY24x36 SCALE: 1" = 200' A G N O L I BARBER&BRUNDAGE,INC.2001000200 N NOTE: THE PURPOSE OF THIS PRESERVE EXHIBIT IS TO REVISE THE PRESERVE CONFIGURATION IN PARCELS 3B AND 9 ONLY. ALL OTHER ASPECTS OF THE PUD MASTER PLAN SHALL REMAIN AS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE NO. 13-37, 09-34, AND 07-46. PL20160000404 Warranty Deed PL20160000404 Identifying Owners & All parties of Corporation 7/20/2016 Detail by Entity Name http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=SOBELVANDERBILT%…1/2 Home Contact Us EFiling Services Document Searches Forms Help Document Number FEI/EIN Number Date Filed Effective Date State Status Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Liability Company SOBEL VANDERBILT LLC Filing Information L15000193766 811962441 11/16/2015 11/12/2015 FL ACTIVE Principal Address 2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE SUITE 370 BOCA RATON, FL 33431 Mailing Address 2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE SUITE 370 BOCA RATON, FL 33431 Registered Agent Name & Address SOBEL, JEFFREY E 2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 370 BOCA RATON, FL 33431 Authorized Person(s) Detail Name & Address Title MGR SOBEL, JEFFREY E 2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 370 BOCA RATON, FL 33431 Title MGR SOBEL, SAMUEL R 2385 NW EXECUTIVE CENTER DRIVE, SUITE 370 BOCA RATON, FL 33431 7/20/2016 Detail by Entity Name http://search.sunbiz.org/Inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail?inquirytype=EntityName&directionType=Initial&searchNameOrder=SOBELVANDERBILT%…2/2 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2016 04/25/2016 Document Images 04/25/2016 ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/16/2015 Florida Limited Liability View image in PDF format Copyright © and Privacy Policies State of Florida, Department of State The owners of Sobel Vanderbilt, LLC. Samuel R. Sobel Revocable Living Trust UAD 11/16/1973 25% S&C Sobel, LLLP 25% Jeffrey E. Sobel Revocable Living Trust UAD 7/24/98 1% Sobel Vanderbilt Development, LLC 49% PL20160000404 Affidavit of Authorization PL20160000404 Addressing Checklist COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form mustbe signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate ty pe below, complete a s eparate Add ressing Checklist for each Petition type) BL (Blasting Permit) BD (Boat Dock Ex tension) Carnival/Circus P ermit CU (Conditional Use) EXP (Excavation Permit) FP (Final Plat LLA (Lot Line A djustment) PNC (P roject Name Change) PPL (Plans & Plat Revie w) PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Pl at) PUD Rezone RZ (Standard Rezone) SDP (Site Development Plan) SDPA (SDP Amendment) SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) SIP (Site Im provement Plan) SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) SNR (S treet Name Change) SNC (S treet Name Change – Unplatted) TDR (T ransfer of Development Rights) VA (Variance) VRP (Vegetation Remov al P ermit) VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill P ermit) OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than on e) STREET ADDRESS or AD DRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) 1 LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) SDP - or AR or PL # SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Please Return Approved Checklist By: Email Personally picked up Applicant Name: Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approv ed by: Date: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 2 Fax Email/Fax:Phone: Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) PL20160000404 Legal Description And Location Map LOCATION MAP EXHIBIT A THE FALLS OF PORTOFINOSOBEL COMPANY PROJECT PL20160000404 Section II Project Development Requirements [12137-0002/2549353/1] Revised 03/09/17 Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. Section II, Project Development Requirements, of the PUD Document, attached to Ordinance 2007-46, as amended, the Wolf Creek RPUD, is hereby amended as follows: SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.5 RELATED PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS A. Prior to the recording of a recorded plat, and/or condominium plat for all or part of the RPUD, final plans of all required improvements shall receive approval of the appropriate Collier County governmental agency to insure compliance with the RPUD Master Plan, Collier County subdivision rules, and the platting laws of the State of Florida. B. Exhibit “A”, RPUD Master Plan, Exhibit “P” Preserve Exhibit for Parcels 3B and 9, and Exhibit “A-1” RPUD Master Plan Amended, constitutes the required RPUD development plan. The sole purpose of Exhibit “P” is to revise the preserve configuration for Parcels 3B and 9 only. Subsequent to or concurrent with RPUD approval, a subdivision plat or SDP, as applicable may be submitted for areas covered by the RPUD Master Plan. Any division of the property and the development of the land shall be in compliance with the RPUD Master Plan Exhibit “A”, Exhibit “P” and Exhibit “A-1” and the LDC. C. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructure improvements regarding any dedications to Collier County and the methodology for providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities. PL20160000404 List of Exhibits and Tables Revised 03/09/17 Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. The “List of Exhibits and Tables,” of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance 2007 -46, as amended, the Wolf Creek RPUD, is hereby amended as follows: LIST OF EXHIBITS AND TABLES EXHIBIT “A” RPUD MASTER PLAN – ORIGINAL (pertains to Parcels 3B-9) EXHIBIT “A-1” RPUD MASTER PLAN AMENDED (pertains to Parcels 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B & 3A) EXHIBIT “B” RPUD CONCEPTUAL UTILITY/WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN EXHIBIT “C” PRIVATE ROAD CROSS-SECTION – PARCELS 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B & 3A EXHIBIT “D” ALTERNATIVE PATHWAYS PLAN – PARCEKS 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B & 3A EXHBIT “E” PRISTINE DRIVE CROSS-SECTION – PARCELS 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B & 3A EXHIBIT “P” PRESERVE EXHIBIT for Parcels 3B & 9 TABLE I DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - PARCELS 3B – 9 TABLE II DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS – PARCELS 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B & 3A PL20160000404 Section IV Preserve Areas Plan Revised 03/09/17 Words struck through are deleted; words underlined are added. Section IV, Preserve Areas Plan, of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance 2007-46, as amended, the Wolf Creek RPUD, is hereby amended as follows: SECTION IV PRESERVE AREAS PLAN 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for the Preserve Areas as shown on Exhibit “A”, RPUD Master Plan, Exhibit “P” Preserve Exhibit for Parcels 3B and 9, and Exhibit “A-1”, RPUD Master Plan Amended, as may be amended pursuant to this Document. The sole purpose of Exhibit “P” is to revise the preserve configuration for Parcels 3B and 9 only. Any approvals to remove native vegetation in the on -site Preserve Areas shall be conditional upon having a remaining minimum of 34.26± acres of native vegetation on - site. PL20160000404 Preserve Allocation PARCEL 1A (FORMERLY PART OF PALERMO RPUD ) 15.77 ACRES RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY) PARCEL 3B 12.00 ACRES RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE, TWO, MULTI-FAMILY OR ATTACHED TOWN HOUSES) PROPOSED LAKEPROPOSED LAKERESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE, TWO, MULTI-FAMILY OR ATTACHED TOWN HOUSES) RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY) RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY) RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY) PRO P O S E D LAK E PROPOSED LAKE PROPOSED LAKE PROPOSED LAKE RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE, TWO, MULTI-FAMILY OR ATTACHED TOWN HOUSES) PROPOSED LAKE RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY) PRESERVE AREA PRESERVE AREA PRESERVE AREA RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY) PRESERVE AREA PRESERVE AREA PRESERVE AREA PRESERVEAREAPRESERVE AREAPARCEL 6 20.27 ACRES PARCEL 5 15.90 ACRES RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE, TWO, MULTI-FAMILY OR ATTACHED TOWN HOUSES) VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD VANDERBILT BEACH ROAD BUCKSTONE DRIVECAROLINA VILLAGE MPUD OFFICE/SPECIALTY RETAIL CAROLINA WAYPRISTINE DRIVEPARCEL 7 20.27 ACRES PARCEL 9 20.27 ACRES PARCEL 4 20.27 ACRES PARCEL 8 10.14 ACRES PARCEL 3A 8.27 ACRES PARCEL 2A (FORMELY PARCEL 2) 20.28 ACRES PROPOSED LAKE PROPOSED LAKE PARCEL 2B5.08 ACRESRESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY) ZONED: A EXISTING COMCAST FACILITY (NOT PART OF PUD) BLACK BEAR RIDGE SONOMA LAKES PUD RESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIAL ISLAND WALK PUDGATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITYISLAND WALK PUDGATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITYISLAND WALK PUDGATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITYPALERMO COVE RPUD RESIDENTIAL PALERMO COVE RPUD RESIDENTIAL MISSION HILLS DRIVE MISSION HILLS PUD COMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTER WOLF CREEK RPUD BOUNDARY PRESERVE AREA PALERMO COVE RPUD RESIDENTIAL PARCEL 1B (FORMERLY PARCEL 1) 20.29 ACRES RESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY) WOLFE RD. TRACT P-2 TRACT P-1 TRACT P-4A PROPOSED LAKE RAFFIA PRESERVE RAFFIA PRESERVE BLACK BEAR RIDGE-PHASE 1 P.B. 43, PGS. 89-92 TRACT P-1 0.244 ACRES FALLS OF PORTOFINO BLACK BEAR RIDGE-PHASE 1 P.B. 43, PGS. 89-92 TRACT P-2 0.702 ACRES BLACK BEAR RIDGE-PHASE 2 P.B. 47, PGS. 40-42 TRACT P-1 2.342 ACRES BLACK BEAR RIDGE-PHASE 1 P.B. 43, PGS. 89-92 TRACT P-3 0.22 ACRES BLACK BEAR RIDGE-PHASE 1 P.B. 43, PGS. 89-92 TRACT P-4B 0.246 ACRES BLACK BEAR RIDGE-PHASE 1 P.B. 43, PGS. 89-92 TRACT P-4A 5.36 ACRES VANDERBILT RESERVE PROPOSED PLAT 3.06 ACRES FALLS OF PORTOFINO SDP-2005-AR-7064 O.R. 3973, PGS. 2911-2927 5.68 ACRES VANDERBILT RESERVE VANDERBILT RESERVEPARCEL 3ARAFFIA PRESERVE-PHASE 1 P.B. 54, PGS. 72-83 TRACT P-7 0.72 ACRES RAFFIA PRESERVE-PHASE 1 P.B. 54, PGS. 72-83 TRACT P-6 9.94 ACRES ACCESS EASEMENT (O.R. 4655, PG. 1763) PRESERVE AREA PRESERVE AREA ISLAND WALK PUDGATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITYPALERMO COVE RPUD RESIDENTIAL RAFFIA PRESERVE-PHASE 1 P.B. 54, PGS. 72-83 TRACT P-1 1.54 ACRES RAFFIA PRESERVE-PHASE 1 P.B. 54, PGS. 72-83 TRACT P-2 4.21 ACRES 24x36 SCALE: 1" = 200' A G N O L I BARBER&BRUNDAGE,INC.2001000200 N CLIENT NAME:PROJECT NAME:CHECKED BY: JAC REVIEWED BY: ABB HORIZ. SCALE: 1" = 200' VERT. SCALE: N/A DRAWING TITLE:1SHEET OF Acad File # ACAD FILE NAME: ABB PROJECT # PLOT VIEW \ LAYOUT Preserve 11503_pa 15-0106 1REVISION:DESIGN BY: ABB DRAWN BY: RAFWOLF CREEK RPUDDATE: AUGUST 2016 SUITE 440SOBEL VANDERBILT, LLCBOCA RATON, FL 334312385 N.W. EXECUTIVE CENTER DR.,PRESERVE ALLOCATIONBY PLAT EXHIBIT11503_pa Matchline - A Matchline - A WOLF CREEK RPUD TOTAL PRESERVE AREAS RAFFIA PRESERVE 16.41 (PARCELS 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A) RAFFIA PRESERVE - PHASE 1, PLAT BOOK 54 PGS 72-83 TRACTS P-1,P-2,P-6 & P-7 TRACT P-1 1.54 TRACT P-2 4.21 TRACT P-6 9.94 TRACT P-7 0.72 16.41 AC. BLACK BEAR RIDGE 9.11 (PARCELS 6, 7, 8) BLACK BEAR RIDGE - PHASE 1, PLAT BOOK 43 PGS 89-92 TRACTS P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4A, P-4B BLACK BEAR RIDGE - PHASE 2, PLAT BOOK 47 PGS 40-42 TRACT P-1 TRACT P-1 0.244 TRACT P-2 0.702 TRACT P-3 0.22 TRACT P-4A 5.36 TRACT P-4B 0.246 TRACT P-1 (PHASE 2)2.342 9.11 AC. FALLS OF PORTOFINO 5.68 (PARCELS 4, 5) SDP-2005-AR-7064 O.R. BOOK 3973, PGS 2911-2927 VANDERBILT RESERVE 3.06 (PARCELS 3B, 9) PROPOSED PLAT _____________________________________________ TOTAL 34.26 AC. PARCEL 1A(FORMERLY PART OF PALERMO RPUD )15.77 ACRESRESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY)PROPOSED LAKEPROPOSED LAKEISLAND WALK PUD GATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ISLAND WALK PUD GATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY PRESERVE AREAPALERMO COVE RPUDRESIDENTIALPARCEL 1B(FORMERLY PARCEL 1) 20.29 ACRESRESIDENTIAL AREA (SINGLE FAMILY)RAFFIA PRESERVERAFFIA PRESERVE-PHASE 1P.B. 54, PGS. 72-83TRACT P-70.72 ACRESVANDERBILT RESERVEPROPOSED PLAT3.06 ACRESFALLS OF PORTOFINOSDP-2005-AR-7064O.R. 3973, PGS. 2911-29275.68 ACRESPRESERVE AREAPRESERVE AREAISLAND WALK PUD GATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY PALERMO COVE RPUDRESIDENTIALRAFFIA PRESERVE-PHASE 1P.B. 54, PGS. 72-83TRACT P-11.54 ACRESRAFFIA PRESERVE-PHASE 1P.B. 54, PGS. 72-83TRACT P-24.21 ACRESMatchline - AMatchline - AWOLF CREEK RPUD TOTAL PRESERVE AREASRAFFIA PRESERVE 16.41(PARCELS 1A, 1B, 2A, 2B, 3A)RAFFIA PRESERVE - PHASE 1, PLAT BOOK 54 PGS 72-83TRACTS P-1,P-2,P-6 & P-7TRACT P-11.54TRACT P-24.21TRACT P-69.94TRACT P-70.7216.41 AC.BLACK BEAR RIDGE 9.11(PARCELS 6, 7, 8)BLACK BEAR RIDGE - PHASE 1, PLAT BOOK 43 PGS 89-92TRACTS P-1, P-2, P-3, P-4A, P-4BBLACK BEAR RIDGE - PHASE 2, PLAT BOOK 47 PGS 40-42TRACT P-1TRACT P-10.244TRACT P-20.702TRACT P-30.22TRACT P-4A5.36TRACT P-4B0.246TRACT P-1 (PHASE 2)2.3429.11 AC.FALLS OF PORTOFINO 5.68(PARCELS 4, 5)SDP-2005-AR-7064O.R. BOOK 3973, PGS 2911-2927VANDERBILT RESERVE3.06(PARCELS 3B, 9)PROPOSED PLAT_____________________________________________TOTAL 34.26 AC. PARCEL 3B12.00 ACRESRESIDENTIAL AREA(SINGLE, TWO, MULTI-FAMILY OR ATTACHED TOWN HOUSES)PROPOSEDLAKEPROPOSED LAKE RESIDENTIAL AREA(SINGLE, TWO, MULTI-FAMILY OR ATTACHED TOWN HOUSES)RESIDENTIAL AREA(SINGLE FAMILY)RESIDENTIAL AREA(SINGLE FAMILY)RESIDENTIAL AREA(SINGLE FAMILY)PROPOSEDLAKE PROPOSEDLAKEPROPOSEDLAKEPROPOSEDLAKERESIDENTIAL AREA(SINGLE, TWO, MULTI-FAMILY OR ATTACHED TOWN HOUSES)PROPOSEDLAKERESIDENTIAL AREA(SINGLE FAMILY)PRESERVE AREAPRESERVE AREAPRESERVE AREARESIDENTIAL AREA(SINGLE FAMILY)PRESERVE AREAPRESERVE AREAPRESERVEAREAPRESERVE AREA PRESERVE AREA PARCEL 620.27 ACRESPARCEL 515.90 ACRESRESIDENTIAL AREA(SINGLE, TWO, MULTI-FAMILY OR ATTACHED TOWN HOUSES)VANDERBILT BEACH ROADVANDERBILT BEACH ROADBUCKSTONE DRIVECAROLINA VILLAGE MPUDOFFICE/SPECIALTY RETAILCAROLINA WAYPRISTINE DRIVE PARCEL 720.27 ACRESPARCEL 920.27 ACRESPARCEL 420.27 ACRESPARCEL 810.14 ACRESPARCEL 3A8.27 ACRESPARCEL 2A (FORMELY PARCEL 2)20.28 ACRESPARCEL 2B 5.08 ACRES RESIDENTIALAREA(SINGLEFAMILY)ZONED: AEXISTINGCOMCASTFACILITY(NOT PARTOF PUD)BLACK BEAR RIDGESONOMA LAKES PUDRESIDENTIAL/COMMERCIALISLAND WALK PUD GATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY ISLAND WALK PUD GATED RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY PALERMO COVE RPUDRESIDENTIALPALERMO COVE RPUDRESIDENTIALMISSION HILLS DRIVEWOLFE RD.TRACT P-2TRACT P-1TRACT P-4APROPOSEDLAKERAFFIA PRESERVEBLACK BEAR RIDGE-PHASE 1P.B. 43, PGS. 89-92TRACT P-10.244 ACRESFALLS OF PORTOFINOBLACK BEAR RIDGE-PHASE 1P.B. 43, PGS. 89-92TRACT P-20.702 ACRESBLACK BEAR RIDGE-PHASE 2P.B. 47, PGS. 40-42TRACT P-12.342 ACRESBLACK BEAR RIDGE-PHASE 1P.B. 43, PGS. 89-92TRACT P-4B0.246 ACRESBLACK BEAR RIDGE-PHASE 1P.B. 43, PGS. 89-92TRACT P-4A5.36 ACRESVANDERBILT RESERVEVANDERBILT RESERVEPARCEL 3A RAFFIA PRESERVE-PHASE 1P.B. 54, PGS. 72-83TRACT P-69.94 ACRESACCESS EASEMENT(O.R. 4655, PG. 1763)MISSION HILLS PUDCOMMERCIAL SHOPPING CENTERWOLF CREEK RPUDBOUNDARYBLACK BEAR RIDGE-PHASE 1P.B. 43, PGS. 89-92TRACT P-30.22 ACRES24x36 SCALE: 1" = 200'AGNOLIBARBER&BRUNDAG E ,I N C.2001000200N PL20160000404 Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) November 10, 2016 K:\2015\15-0106 - The Falls of Portofino\Correspondences\Documents\NIM\Wolf Creek RPUD NIM Meeting Minutes - 4-21-2017.docx Wolf Creek RPUD Neighborhood Information Meeting Notes, November 10, 2016 Bruce Anderson introduced himself as representing Sobel Vanderbilt LLC, Jim Carr, P.E. for Agnoli, Barber & Brundage the Engineering firm on this project and Daniel Smith the Planner from Collier County Government. Bruce proceeded with the outline of the PUD Insubstantial Change application and project information. The purpose of the change is to amend the PUD Master Plan to show the minimum required preserve area within Wolf Creek RPUD. Our project is the last one and the purposes of the Amendment is to reflect the preserve areas on the property, in the PUD have been met. The only parcel being modified on the master plan is the Parcel 3B & 9 (Vanderbilt Reserve). The preserve area graphically shown is being reduced on the 3B & 9 parcel to demonstrate that the total minimum 34.26 acres is met for the RPUD. The following questions were asked by residents of adjacent developments, primarily from Black Bear Ridge, within the RPUD. Since attendees were talking over each other asking multiple questions at one time, we have provided a list of questions that were asked and discussed below. Exhibits were shown on display to give the attendees an idea of the PUD Master Plan revision. (Exhibits attached) Jim Carr, the Engineer for the project explained where the proposed changes are, and what was provided in the original PUD Master Plan. Mr. Carr showed the PUD Master Plan Preserve before and after the project completion. He went over the size of the development, the number of units and where the entrance would be. He explained what preserve is currently there and that the 4 parcels within the PUD have different areas of preserve. That the older PUD maps did not quantify any of these areas it was only graphic. Being the last one to come in we were able to quantify the parcels and that is how we got to where we are today. Jim, Bruce and Dan explained that there would not be affordable housing. Daniel Smith explained how the PUD Application process works through Collier County Government. • Could you elaborate how much preserve is there today and what is being changed? • Is there going to be affordable housing? • What will the preserve look like after the amendment? • What percent preserve is on Parcel 3B and 9 compared to the other communities? • What does the development look like? Is there a gate entrance, high rise, is there affordable housing? • Why does this parcel get the balance of available preserve, why don’t others get it? Why couldn’t Black Bear Ridge take some and build a park? • With reduction of preserve how much more developable land does Sobel get and how much revenue to this project? K:\2015\15-0106 - The Falls of Portofino\Correspondences\Documents\NIM\Wolf Creek RPUD NIM Meeting Minutes - 4-21-2017.docx • How much preserve percentage does this parcel have compared to others? • Is there a cost sharing for preserves? • Would WCI have to notify anyone that they were dividing Parcel 4? • When did Sobel purchase the property? • How can the attendees review this reduction on a PUD plan without seeing a site plan? • If this PUD change is not approved, how many additional units are being added? • Do more units added to this parcel change the cost sharing of the traffic light on Pristine Drive? • Are these condos or townhomes? • Is there one entrance? Can the entrance be moved north to align with their preserve or lake? • Are we going to take down trees adjacent to Pristine Drive? • Will there be more apartments like the adjacent Falls of Portofino? • Will there be an access road from Island Walk to Pristine Drive? • Will these be limited to two story? • What is the price of these units? • What is the product compared to surrounding developments? • Who is the developer? • What is density? • What is other parcel on Vanderbilt that has low income housing? • What is maximum units allowed? • Is there an amenity? • Is there carport or driveway or garage? • Is owner considering fitting in with the community? Did owner look at price point of single family homes vs. townhouse? • Traffic is a concern from Island Walk, Raffia Preserve and others using Pristine Drive. • How many acres is property? • What are the setbacks? Portofino condos seem to be right on the road. Is this similar? • Are any units affordable like the Bristol Pines development east of Collier Blvd? • What is the size of the units? • What is the process through Collier County? The November 10, 2016 meeting was adjourned. A second informal neighborhood meeting was held on January 10, 2017 which approximately 30 people attended. Bruce Anderson (Attorney), Jim Carr (Engineer), Tirso Sanjose (Owner), Norm Trebilcock (Traffic Engineer), and Kim Schlachta (Environmental Consultant) were in attendance and discussed the questions listed above. PL20160000404 Public Hearing Signs Posted K:\2015\15-0106 - The Falls of Portofino\Correspondences\Documents\Public Hearing Process\Public Hearing Sign Location Map.docx Public Hearing Sign Locations