Loading...
HEX Agenda 04/13/2017 COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER HEARINGS AGENDA APRIL 13, 2017 AGENDA THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 9:00 AM ON THURSDAY, APRIL 13, 2017 IN CONFERENCE ROOM 610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/PLANNING & REGULATION BUILDING, 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF: 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED DURING PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT, PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL. THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. REVIEW OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF PRIOR MEETING MINUTES: March 9, 2017 and March 23, 2017 4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: NOTE: This item which was continued from the March 9, 2017 HEX Meetina and the March 23, 2017 HEX meeting will not be heard at the April 13, 2017 HEX meetine and will be re -advertised for a later date. A. PETITION NO. VA-PL20160002992 - Mark Adrian Williams and Donna Marie Delvecchio request a variance from Ordinance 81-29, as amended, the Wyndemere PUD, to reduce the minimum rear yard setback on conventional single family lots from 10 feet to 6.2 feet for an existing pool screen enclosure and patio, located at Lot 50, The Lodgings at Wyndemere Section One subdivision, also described as 8 Bramblewood Point, in Section 19, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, c&s'sting of 0.33± acres. [Coordinator: Eric Johnson, Principal Planner] B. PETITION NO. BD-PL20160002220— Brian Coe requests a 24 -foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of 44 feet, to accommodate a new docking facility for the benefit of Lot 22, Landings at Bear's Paw, also described as 1692 Vinland Way, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Daniel J. Smith, AICP, Principal Planner] C. PETITION NO. VA-PL20160002424 — Monica Calvert Hawn Revocable Living Trust requests a variance from Section 4.02.01 A., Table 2.1 of the Land Development Code to reduce the minimum rear yard setback line from 25 feet to 18.9 feet for a single family house with a lanai that will be enclosed, on property located at Lot 4, Block H, Lakewood Unit 1 subdivision, also described as 412 Marathon Court, approximately '/2 mile north of Tamiami Trail East and just east of Lakewood Boulevard, in Section 13, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Rachel Beasley, Planner] �.a D. PETITION NO. BDE-PL20160002607 — Joe Castrogiovanni requests a 22 -foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 42 feet to accommodate a boat dock facility with two vessels for the benefit of Lot 190, Isles of Capri No. 2 subdivision, also described as 168 Pago Pago Drive W. in Section 32, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Rachel Beasley, Planner] 5. OTHER BUSINESS 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS 7. ADJOURN March 9, 2017 HEX Meeting TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Naples, Florida, March 9, 2017 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Hearing Examiner, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples, Florida, with the following people present: HEARING EXAMINER MARK STRAIN ALSO PRESENT: Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Nancy Gundlach, Principal Planner Rachel Beasley, Principal Planner Scott Stone, Assistant County Attorney Page I of 12 March 9, 2017 HEX Meeting HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Good morning, everyone. Welcome to the Thursday, March 9th meeting of the Collier County Hearing Examiner's Office. If everybody will please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. (Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you. Review of the agenda. There are three items on the agenda today. Iteio 4.A is Petition VA-PL20160002992. It's for Mark Adrian Williams and Donna Marie Delvecchio. It's in the Wyndemere PUD. That item will not be heard today. That item's been requested to be continued to April 13th, so that Wyndemere petition will not be heard today. So it will be continued to the April 13th Hearing Examiner's meeting. Same time in this room. So is anybody here for that first item? (No response.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Other than that, there are no other changes to the agenda. I've also -- number three, approval of prior meeting minutes, I've reviewed those, those are approved as written. ***That takes us into the first advertised public hearing. Again, the 4.A, the Wyndemere variance, has been continued to April 13th so we'll move right into Petition VA-PL20160001264. It's Pauline Christie, requesting a variance from the LDC for a minimum side yard setback in Golden Gate Estates at 5095 Palmetto Woods Drive. All those wishing to testify on behalf of this item, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. If you're going to speak on this item, please rise to be sworn in. (All speakers were duly sworn.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you. I have talked to staff, I've met with the applicant once, I reviewed all the files, looked at the history of the project of this particular address, and that's the extent of my disclosures on that. And at this point I don't have any other documents I read. But mostly staff report. So with that, I don't believe -- no members of the public other than the applicant are here for this item. Are there ��py members of the public here for this item? (No response.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay, at this point I have read the entire document. I will not need a staff report or a -- I'm sorry, I will not need a presentation by the applicant. However, if the applicant will come up and just identify herself for the record so we know she was here for this hearing. MS. CHRISTIE: Good morning. I m Pauline Christie. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: And you're the -- you're the property owner for this particular address? MS. CHRISTIE: Yes, I am. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Your house was built when the code allowed a 15 -foot setback and your pool cage was put thereat the setback at 18.8. And it looks like you said you want to take a single -story pool cage and make it a two-story; is that what this is all about? MS. CHRISTIE: Yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: That's what I thought. Thank you, that's all I need from you. I have no other questions. MS. CHRISTIE: Okay. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I know it seems rather simple for government, but since I read everything ahead of time it's not necessary to repeat everything that I've read, so -- MS. CHRISTIE: Okay, thank you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you. And we'll next go to staff report. Nancy? I MS. GUNULACH: Staff recommends approval. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Nancy, you are noted for your brief staff reports. And I have reviewed the old codes and this definitely is one of those caught into the time change Page 2 of 12 March 9, 2017 HEX Meeting between the old code and new. I don't have any other questions for it. Staff is recommending approval. The only stipulation that I noted in staff was leave it at the 18.8 feet that it previously was approved at. Is that -- MS. GUNDLACH: That is correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. With that, we will close the public hearing -- oh, any members of the public here wishing to testify on behalf of this item? (No response.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I know I keep repeating that, but I don't want to miss anybody. Okay, with that we'll close the public hearing in this matter and a decision will be rendered within 30 days. Thank you, ma'am, that's all there is to it today. ***That takes us to number two on our agenda, Item 4.C. It's Petition number BD-PL20160000357. It's Michael Whalen for a -- requesting approval of a boathouse at lot four, block F in the Brookside subdivision. And the address is 1792 Holiday Lane. All those wishing to testify on behalf of this item, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (All speakers were duly sworn.) HEARING ; XAMINER STRAIN: Okay, disclosures. On my part, I really didn't have a lot of discussion on this until today. Whoever's got that cell phone, if you don't mind turning it down a little bit. I received the one letter of no objection and actually a letter recommending approval from a resident across the way, across the road, Mrs. Kokkinos, Mr. and Mrs. Kokkinos. This morning when I first came in I noticed people in the audience, a couple of them came up and talked to me. They are neighbors across the canal, at least one was. There was two letters provided expressing concerns about the project. I have since explained to them prior to the meeting what the implications were with this boathouse cover -- or this boat cover, as well as the dock and its width and the distances both across the canal and the lot lines. Their letters of concern will be filed with the court reporter as a record of the meeting. My understanding, that after I explained things to them, their concerns were somewhat relieved as a result of that. I'll definitely, after we finish if they still have concerns they can come up and speak, but at least we've gotten that far this morning. So with that, how many of the public are here to address this item? I know the two people in front, two more in back. Okay, three. And with that, Mr. Whalen, if you wouldn't mind coming up and identifying yourself for the record. MR. WHALEN: My name is Michael Whalen, I'm the owner of 1792 Holiday Lane. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you. Normally what happens, most of the time if there's objections or concerns and we get them ahead of time, and when that happens, because this room doesn't have the overhead projector, or what's called an ELMO, that you can slide things around on the fly and it can be seen overhead. I tried to put your project on the overhead so that it will tie into this projector ahead of time. I didn't do that because I had not received any objections. This morning with some concerns expressed I wish now I had done it on your behalf so you could have explained your project. But I'll try to explain it. I know I could ask you to do that, but I can probably make sure and explain it as I understand that you intend it to be and we don't have anything mixed up to the detriment of anybody in the neighborhood. You have an existing boat dock, and I believe you're replacing it with a new boat dock; is that true? MR. WHALEN: Correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. The new boat dock is a total of almost just under 53 feet. The north side of the boat dock is 15 feet back from your north property line; is that true? MR. WHALEN: Correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: The south side of the boat dock is at least 15 feet, if not possibly more from the riparian line. Page 3 of 12 March 9, 2017 HEX Meeting The boathouse is not the full width or size of the dock. The boathouse is about a little over 30 feet. MR. WHALEN: Correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: So it doesn't cover --and it's 30 feet over where the boat is being placed which is 16 feet back from the north side of the boathouse, from what I can see -- or the boat dock, I'm sorry. MR. WHALEN: Correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. The boat dock also is only 17 feet, four, excluding the allowed roof overhang of two foot, six from the seawall; is that correct? MR. WHALEN: Correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Now, I want to ask staff to kind of jump in on this. Does the boat dock -- let's forget about the boathouse which in this case is a cover over the boat. Does the boat dock -- would it have required any public process to be here today? MS. BEASLEY: It does not, no. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: So the boat dock doesn't exceed any of the minimum standards of the Land Development Code and someone could have come in and obtained a building permit to build just a dock with no trouble at all? MS. BEASLEY: Correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: The boathouse mirrors the -- somewhat of the footprint of the boat dock with the exception of the roof overhang. And it was because they were requesting the boathouse, it had come in for a review publicly; is that right? MS. BEASLEY: This is correct, yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Mr. Whalen, I think I explained most of your project. And I did that for the benefit of those people here who may not have seen the plans or to the detail that they've been included in the packet. I don't knew,, what questions may come from the public. If you have nothing to add to what I've just expressed right now, then we'll listen to the public's concerns and I may call you back, unless you have something else you'd like to say right now. MR. WHALEN: No, I'm good. We'll wait on the questions. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Thank you, sir. That's all I've got. Let me move to a staff report. MS. BEASLEY: Yes, a staff report was supplied. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: You've been talking to Nancy too much. Does staff recommend approval? MS. BEASLEY: Yes, staff recommends approval of the boathouse. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Were there any conditions or stipulations, other than what -- the drawings themselves? MS. BEASLEY: No, there were not. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: And welcome back, Rachel. I know you've been out for quite a while on maternity leave. MS. BEASLEY: Yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: So congratulations and welcome back. MS. BEASLEY: Well thank you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: And with that, I'll move to public speakers. First of all, Fred, I had asked if you didn't mind making a few copies. Could you bring those up? Or Rachel. MS. BEASLEY: Yes, I have them -- HEARINC '3XAMINER STRAIN: I need you to keep copies for your record. Could you give one of each to the court reporter. MS. BEASLEY: I also have a letter of approval. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Of Mr. and Mrs. Kokkinos? MS. BEASLEY: Yes. Page 4 of 12 March 9, 2017 HEX Meeting HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I've already distributed that to the court reporter. MS. BEASLEY: All right. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: And I need a copy as well of the two for my records. Now, after we go through the further questions and discussion this morning, the two people that brought the letters in are sitting near the second row back. If they still have questions after hearing this today, I'll ask that they come up and see if there's any concerns that haven't been addressed. So with that, I know some people in the back raised their hand to discuss. If you'll please come up to the speaker one at a time and use that microphone over there. You need to state your name for the record. MS. HARPER: Hello. My name is Leslie Harper and I live right next door to Michael Whalen's house. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: North or south side? MS. HARPER: South. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Are you objecting or are you in favor? MS. HA"ER: Well, objecting. I have a list that I emailed -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Hand it to me, but you'll have to not speak and go back to the microphone; otherwise you won't be recorded and these meetings are all testimony that is recorded. MS. HARPER: Yeah, I believe we did send her an email, the woman that was on the paperwork that was on the website. We did send her an email explaining, but she never responded. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I have not received it so this is the first I've heard of any objections to the project. So let's -- and ma'am, I don't know how you want to approach this. MS. HARPER: Well, I'll just explain it. I went around and talked to a lot of the neighbors, and some of them are here today. And I think one of them was neutral with it. I mean, I talked to like eight different neighbors. Most of them were across the waterway from me and down the waterway, the people that would be affected by the sight of it. And the thing is their house is the biggest house anywhere. I mean, it's twice as tall as mine. And if you have seen a photo of it? I'm not sure. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: No, but the issue today has nothing to do with the house so it's not an item that I could even weigh in on. MS. HARPER: Well, it's the aesthetics of how it's going to look with the house. The screen is so big that it's only four feet from the seawall, and I believe it's supposed to be eight feet back. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Again, that's not for today's hearing. MS. HARPER: Anyway, so if you build a boathouse 53 feet long, I thought it was 55 feet. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: No, the deck is 53 feet, but the boathouse is about 30 or 31 feet long. And it's in front of their property. It's not -- in fact, it's more towards the north side of their property than it is to the sod.-.' actually if you're on the south side you would be less impacted potentially by it than if you were on the north side, just because of distances. MS. HARPER: Okay, that's not making sense because it's 15 on each side per the diagram. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Well, and I'll have to ask the staff to tell me from -- a 52 -foot boat, what is the distance north and south of the property lines? I know what the aerial shows. I'm trying to get a clarification on the detail on the drawings. MS. BEASLEY: You're looking for a -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: How much frontage is there between the two property lines and where it buffets the canal; do you know? MS. BEASLEY: I'm not sure if I completely understand. I know -- I mean, the drawing shows, it does show 15 -foot setbacks. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: You're right, it is 15 foot on the south and it's 30 feet on the north to the boathouse. So from the boathouse perspective there's more impact to the south but it's still within the setback that's required by code. MS. HARPER: Okay, I understand that. But what you stated earlier didn't make sense as far as the footage, because you said it was 30 feet of a boathouse and then you said it was 16 more feet of a dock. So that's not 53 feet total. Page 5 of 12 March 9, 2017 HEX Meeting HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: No, I'll tell you what the numbers are. And I wish I had the overhead for this reason. The boathouse is -- let's start with the setbacks. It meets the code requirement of a 15 -foot setback on both north and south. On the north side there's a 16 -foot dimension to the cut-out of the dock where the boat starts, the roof overhang for the boathouse, and it's not scaled so it's not stated on here so it looks to be a foot or two more than that. So your 15 feet plus 16, maybe 18 feet before you start the boathouse. Then the boathouse, according to the other drawing, goes about 31 feet. So you add 16 to 31, you come up with 47, and you add a couple more feet for that depth, you're right about the 52 feet, nine inches they say they're building to. And Rachel may have a diagram. I wish we had gotten your email, we could have tried to resolve all of this and I would have had it on the overhead. So I apologize, I did not realize there were objections to this today. MS. HARPER: Okay. Well, the main issue is how it looks aesthetically. And the other main issue is I don't understand why he doesn't put the boat opening where he pulls the boat into the house on the north side where it would make more sense. Because what he has to do is turn his 28 -foot boat around in front of everybody else's boats that are sitting in this narrow canal. And my dock is only 16 feet from my property line, which is 31 feet total from his new dock, proposed dock. So I want to know how he's going to turn that boat around in that short little space. And I sometimes have my rowboat sitting out sitting along my dock, and so I'm just concerned that -- I'm asking if maybe he can put the opening on the north end instead of the south end, or make it shorter. Because if he can make the whole thing a little bit shorter, not width -wise but length -wise, then it would just solve that problem. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. And you may have heard the testimony from the staff, the dock itself is not an issue. I mean, if the neighbor wanted to make those changes to accommodate you, that's his desire. It's not an element that is part of today's discussion in regards to being able to say he's in violation of the cod�'and telling him he's got to change it. The only issue we're talking about today is the covering that's going to go over the boat. And the rules are somewhat -- the criteria is somewhat spelled out in it, they have to be no higher than 15 feet above the seawall; they've got to have shingles and roof to match the house; and there's a couple other technical rules as far as setbacks. All those are met according to the staff report. So I'm not sure how we can move to an issue of a dock that didn't even need to be here today, because it's not the dock we're discussing, we're discussing the boat cover, so -- MS. HARPER: Okay, but the dock is part of the boathouse, right? HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: The boathouse actually is over part of the dock. MS. HARPER: Right, so it's all one unit, right? That's what we're talking about. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: No, it's a boat facility made up of a boat cover plus a dock facility. But it doesn't matter. The issue at hand here today, he's here because of the boathouse. The boathouse is the covering that goes over that portion of the dock that he wants to cover his boat up with. And my limitations today will be having to focus on that. Are there any concerns over the specific boathouse that you feel are not consistent with what is allowed to be there, or that you have problems with for whatever reason? And I'll try to explain it. MS. HARPER: Well, yeah, the two that I just talked about, the egress into --the unsafe egress and limited space as it's written here. We wrote up this --these objections. You know, it's just visually going to be so big, one thing. And the --you know, the character of it is going to be just overwhelming, because their house sits right on the end and it's the biggest house and it's just so big compared to all the other little four homes. That's one thing. And the --.v.)u know, most of it is the unsafe egress on that south end. Because a lot of people don't -- aren't always safe with their boats. I'm not saying that he's not. I'm sure he's -- but to turn that big boat around in front of all of our docks is -- I don't know why -- can you ask him to maybe put the opening on the north side? HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I think your request today is making your preference known to him, and if he wants to do it, that's something that he certainly could volunteer to do. Page 6 of 12 March 9, 2017 HEX Meeting My question would be if he's not building this boathouse today, say he wasn't here for that boathouse, would you still be concerned about the egress to the dock? MS. HARPER: No, because there's no boat coming in and out on the south end. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: No, no, if the dock was built just like it's shown with a boat coming out on the south end but he didn't put a cover over it, he didn't put the boathouse over it, you would still have the same issue I would believe; is that correct? MS. HARPER: Right. But also I think the boathouse maybe could be a little smaller as far as like 17 and a half feet is -- it's taking up almost half of the canal visually. If I sit on my dock and I look north, I'm right next to his property. And I look and I see where his boat is now, and he told me that it would look a lot like where his boat would be as far as exactly where it sits on the water. It takes up almost half the canal. Can he make it a little bit in towards the seawall more? HEARING E-XAMINER STRAIN: The requirement for the boat dock in that location, he's not allowed to go over 25 percent of the width of the waterway. He's under that with the facility he's got being proposed here today. I'll ask staff who did the review and reviewed it, interpreted against the code to qualify that. Rachel? MS. BEASLEY: Yes, what was -- I'm sorry, I was -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: The question was -- or the statement was that he's over half of the distance of the waterway. What is the percentage -- go ahead. MS. HARPER: No, I said almost half. Visually it looks like almost half of the waterway. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Could you explain how far into the waterway this boat dock was allowed to go and that it does or does not violate that distance. MS. BEASLEY: It's -- so he's allowed to go up to 20 feet. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: And your report says he's 17 feet, I think four inches; is that correct? MS. BEASLEY: That is correct, yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay, the 17 feet, four inches as far as the percentage of the waterway, he was allowed to go up to 25 percent of the width of the waterway? MS. BEASLEY: That I would have to look at the code, but -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Well, you analyzed this, and I believe those are the numbers you -- MS. BEASLEY: This is true. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Put in your report. Now, is Fred the one that actually --I know you came in late. Lid Fred actually research this? MS. BEASLEY: Right, Maybe. I mean -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Well, there can't be any maybes. MS. BEASLEY: Yeah, I -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: There's a requirement in the code that he can't exceed a certain width of the waterway, based on the width of the waterway. MS. BEASLEY: Right. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Did he exceed that width? And if he didn't, what was the width limited to? MR. BELLOWS: For the record, Ray Bellows. The dock doesn't exceed the maximum 25 percent protrusion into the waterway. It is allowed to go to 20 feet and it's at 17 feet. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. And that's what I wanted to make clear, that the -- up to approximately 50 percent or close to 50. He's not even close to that, he's less than 25 percent. I realized that when I read the application. It's clear in the application where he's out in relationship to the seawall across the waterway. Have you seen the staff report, ma'am? MS. HARPER: Yeah. Page 7 of 12 March 9, 2017 HEX Meeting HEARINGEXAMINERSTRAIN: Okay, the staff report shows its distance as laid out, and it's not over 25 percent. So with that, I -- that's the only other comment I can offer to your concerns. Is there anything else that you wanted to state for the record? MS. HARPER: Yeah, it's just the fact that it overshadows the other residences because it's so big and massive. And, you know, it just creates that unsafe waterway for boaters and --you know, I mean, he has a view. He has the most beautiful view on the whole corner and if he wants a view from his dock, he can still get it if he puts the boat on the other side, you know. And I'm just asking if he could consider that, putting the entryway on the north side. But other than that, it's just -- you know, I'm just asking if he could make it a little bit smaller. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. I appreciate it, ma'am, and I'm sure he's hearing it. And before we finish today I'll ask him if he's going to be able to consider that or not. MS. HARPER: And the other thing is, did you say its only 15 feet above the water level or above the sea wall? HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Above the sea wall. He's not allowed by law to go above -- higher than 15 feet above the sea wall. Whoever's phone that is, please shut it off. MS. HARPER: So it doesn't say on here if it's 15 -- how many feet high it is. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: There's a diagram included in the staff report that shows that dimension. I will try to tell you what page it's on, if you have the staff report. If you loot- on Page 3 7 of the staff report, there's a cross-section of the unit, and it shows the height of the facility at 15 feet. Actually, that's probably more conservative. That's with the -- that's from the level of the dock, which the dock is not above the seawall. So either way he's going to come out adequate for the height of the facility. It can't be above 15 feet greater than the seawall. MS. HARPER: Okay, the other question I have is, is there going to be an electric boat lift? Michael, is there going -- is the boat lift -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Well, he'll -- we can ask that question when he comes up. MS. HARPER: Does the boat lift come further out from the 17 and a half feet? HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: It couldn't. The only thing that could come out past the 17 and a half feet is the roof overhang that's allowed by code. MS. HARPER: Well, you have a list of the objections that we've written down, so -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Yes, ma'am, I have. MS. HARPER: Okay. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you very much. Is there anyone else that would like to speak? MR. WILKENS: Yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Sir, come on up. MR. WILKENS: My name is John Wilkens and I live down the street. I'm new to the neighborhood, so my questions are more administrative than anything else. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Sure, we'll try to answer them. MR. WILKENS: And I think, you know, Leslie's maybe kind of stumbling through this a little bit because she's not necessarily familiar with dealing with county things. My biggest question wasn't -- I mean, is not the dock. I reviewed all the paperwork, everything looked like it was in order. I mean, my -- it looks like you've been diligent in finding a way through what you want to do. The only question I had is why is there a need for this hearing for the boathouse? Is it -- I mean, if there's -- if he's within the code to do the dock, and apparently he's within the code to do the boathouse, why are we even here? MR. BELLOWS: For the record, Ray Bellows. I'm the manager for the zoning section. The impacts associated with a boathouse are different than a dock extension, and there are separate standards that have to be met in order to be approved for a boathouse. And because they are controversial and Page 8 of 12 March 9, 2017 HEX Meeting could have an impact on view for the residents, we require a public hearing. MR. WILKENS: Okay. Well, you know, in trying to help Leslie explain her concern, she obviously lives right next door to him, it's a 15 -foot tall boathouse and it's going to obstruct her view from her location. That's -- when she came -- you know, she came and we talked about it earlier in the week, and that seemed to be one of the bigger objections that was there. I live four houses down, it doesn't really block my view too much. My only concern was, was it going to take up any of the canal. I reviewed the documents and it didn't seem like it was going to take up too much of the canal. But I will state, and maybe for the record, that I'm in the building contract world, so navigating your website is not too difficult for me, but we have an older population in our community and even finding your staff report would h, -,,,ie been very difficult, because there wasn't a link on the notice to take us to where the staff report was located. So it may have been easier for you to get the objections, if there were any, if it were easier to find the staff report. I actually had to -- you know, I tried to show her where it was. I couldn't find it a second time. The first time I found it real easy, the second time I didn't find it so easily, so -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I would have much preferred to understood the concerns of the neighborhood before today so that I could have at least sat down with you and showed you what the process is and where the elements are that may be more focused on today. So I wish it was clearer. I'm sorry. MR. WILKENS: No, I think that --you know, honestly, it's just that I think that with regards to Leslie, anyway, I haven't talked to any of the other neighbors, you know, she didn't even really have a clear understanding of what was going to be happening there. So that's all. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I appreciate your comments, sir. Thank you. Anybody else here? Sir, come on up. MR. HARPER: Good morning. I'm Michael Harper, I live at 1794 Holiday Lane, neighbor to Michael Whalen. The objection that I have to the boathouse is that it will change the character of that canal. When you look up and down that canal, it's old Florida homes with very modest and simple boathouses -- boat docks. And a boathouse at the end of the canal is going to change the character of that community and it's going to overshadow the character of that community. And I think it will also have a negative environmental impact in our community, in our appreciation of the natural environment that we have been blessed with. That's my objection. HEARINC; EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. And I am not familiar with that particular canal. I do a lot of kayaking around Naples, but I don't think I've gotten up in that area before. Are there any other boathouses that you're aware of on the canal? MR. HARPER: No. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay, thank you, sir. Anybody else to speak? Yes, ma'am, please come up and identify yourself for the record. MS. RIGGS: I'm Francis Riggs, I live at 1837 Harbor Lane, and I'm down the canal -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Could you -- you have to speak a little closer. MS. RIGGS: -- from Mr. Whalen. And I -- it will probably affect my view a little bit. But I'm not concerned about the -- I think it's all, you know, been accepted and legal and all that. I'm just a little worried for Leslie and her husband about the safety, and I just want to support that to Mr. Whalen, if there could be any concessions. I know it's between them. But I think it will be important that the boat can get into the boathouse safely. That's all. So I think it's between them, but I just wanted to support that idea. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you very much, ma'am. Anybody else wish to address this issue? (No response.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Mr. Whalen, could you come back up to the microphone, please. Sir, I know you heard the testimony and it seems that the most concerning issue is the direction of Page 9 of 12 March 9, 2017 HEX Meeting entry of your boat into the dock. Your dock is an element that is really not part of today's hearing. The boat cover is. The dock is something that is allowed to be there by right, subject to a building permit. You're under the distance requirements for a dock to need a dock extension. But there are some decision features that for the benefit of the neighborhood you may want to consider. Have you taken a look at those or have you heard of those before today? MR. WHALEN: No, I haven't. Just last night Leslie came over, spoke to me about it. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: You need to get a little closer to the mic. Okay, I think it's good enough. I heard you so far. It's nothing we can tell you from a code perspective that we can insist upon, but if there's some way to work out the direction of that dock to be more beneficial to your neighbors, it might be something you could consider as time goes on. In the meantime, we'll focus --today's issues will be just focused on the boathouse itself. And I don't have any other questions. You've heard the concerns raised by the members of the public. Your screen enclosure and your boathouse seem to be four, five, six feet apart? MR. WHALEN: I'm not sure of that dimension, no. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Do you know, is it a two-story screen included? MR. WHALEN: It is, yeah. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. I don't have any other questions. Staff, is everything fine? Staff understand everything so far, questions of staff at this point? MS. BEA EY: No questions. I understand. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Yes, sir? MR. WHALEN: I do want to address a few things. There are other boathouses in the neighborhood on Harbor, to answer your question. Not on Holiday but on Harbor, which is one canal to the west. There's a couple, two, three of them. It's my belief that the boathouse covering over the boat dock; that is, the boat dock, there's no question, I could have got a permit for that years ago and dealt with that and we'd be here to just talk about the covering, if you will. And it's really not a house, it's a roof on six pilings. I'm a longest tenure resident in that neighborhood, I think. My family moved there in 1970. 1 live in the same home, same address since I was five years old. I know that area pretty well and seen the values grow. The boathouse I believe will increase the values of our neighborhood. It is a developing neighborhood with new development on Davis corner stepping in. Our neighborhood is prime and ripe for increasing tearing down existing old Florida character homes and building better, bigger and better homes. More economical. I personally also received many phone calls from neighbors of support. They called me. I had never heard any negative except for last night with Leslie, so I'm kind of new to this too of any objection. I want to be a good neighbor. The process, as my new neighbor said, is a little -- I will say that the process is laboring and not -- it doesn't make sense but -- on my property, but I'm sure on other properties throughout Collier County it makes sense to have. I found it hard to send people to the website myself to get information. I had to copy stuff. But I know that listed on there Rachel Beasley was always listed there, anybody can always call her to get that information if she cal direct people or email. She was very helpful. Regarding the egress and exit, egress and -- ingress and egress to the south, you know, there's going to be -- the code requires 15 feet on each property line for that specifically so a boat can turn in. I use my boat probably 20 times a year. It will be on a lift. It will be sitting on a lift just like it does in the water right now. My boat, as it sits with the dock, I have whips that push it out away from the dock. My boat -- new proposed boat dock and boathouse is less than that. It will be less restrictive in the canal with the new proposed boat dock and house. I want to tell you that. The roof will look exactly like my home. It will have matching shingles and I believe it will -- to my belief it will better the community in our little neighborhood that I've been there a long time. I think that covers it, I want to say. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. And a couple verifications. The boat lift that you will Page 10 of 12 March 9, 2017 HEX Meeting be installing will not extend beyond the extent of the dock, is that -- MR. WHALEN: That's correct. It's inside the 17 feet and it's directly underneath the roof covering. And that's the purpose of the house is just to cover the boat. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: And I want to verify the 15 -foot height. It's shown on the diagram measured from your dock. The dock is not any higher than the seawall; is that correct? MR. WHALEN: That is correct. And it will be 15 feet total height. That means to the peak. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Right. MR. WHALEN: So it's not at the eve. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Understand. I wanted those clarifications, because one of the cuts for your boat dock were not included in the packet and that would have defined that clearer now that I understand it, so -- And I do want one clarification to make for the residents. I see now where you were concerned it was a 55 -foot dock. Actually what happens is there's a marginal wharf kind of configuration part of the dock that is against the seawall and it goes three feet out from the seawall on the south side that extends three foot past the bulk of the dock. The bulk of the dock is 52 feet, nine inches long, except for the three feet of it that is along the seawall. It goes up to the 15 -foot setback on the south side. So the actual portion of the dock where the boat resides is three foot more in from that 15 -foot setback, according to the diagram that was provided. So that clarification I wanted to make because I heard a couple times that the 55 -foot length was noted for the dock. It is, but that's only three feet of the dock. The remaining 14 feet, four inches of that dock's depth is 52 feet, nine inches. So with that, I don't have any other questions, sir. Thank you, sir. MR. WHALEN: Thank you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Anybody else who has not spoken have anything else they would like to add? (No response.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay, with that, we will close the public hearing on this matter and a decision will be rendered in 30 days. For those folks that were here for this petition, there's a couple of housekeeping matters I did not read into the record, I wal;make those notifications now. All decisions are final unless appealed to the Board of County Commissioners. So if today's decision is unsettling for anybody, they can appeal it to the BCC, and the BCC will take it up based on the qualifications of the decision in comparison to the code or any new issues that may come up. And then the decision will be rendered within 30 days. And that is the end of this particular case. Thank you all for attending and participating. With that, there is no other item on the agenda. Are there any other public comments at this time? (No response.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. With that, this meeting adjourned. Thank you. ************** There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Hearing Examiner at 9:40 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER MARK STRAIN,HEARING EXAMINER Page 11 of 12 March 9, 2017 HEX Meeting ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK These minutes approved by the Hearing Examiner on as presented or as corrected Transcript prepared on behalf of U.S. Legal Support, Inc., by Cherie' R. Nottingham. Page 12 of 12 March 23, 2107 HEX Minutes TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Naples, Florida March 23, 2017 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Hearing Examiner, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples, Florida, with the following people present: HEARING EXAMINER MARK STRAIN ALSO PRESENT: Raymond V. Bellows, Zoning Manager Daniel Smith, Principal Planner Peter Shawinsky, Architect Scott Stone, Assistant County Attorney Page 1 of 3 March 23, 2107 HEX Minutes PROCEEDINGS HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Good morning, everyone. Welcome to the March 23rd meeting of the Collier County Hearing Examiner's Office. If everybody will please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance. (Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you. We have a pretty abbreviated meeting this morning. And I notice that there is no members from the public that are here, other than the applicant's team for the one remaining item. I'm going to dispense with reading the standard elements of our process here today since everybody is familiar with it and move right into the next agenda item, which is Review of the Agenda. And under 4(A), Petition No. VA-PL20160002992, Mark and Adrian Williams and Donna Marie Delvecchio. It's for a Wyndemere PUD variance. That one was continued last time and will be continued again until April 13th, 2017 meeting in this room. The other item is 4(B). It's Petition PDI-PL20160001023, Villas at Greenwood Lakes Homeowners Association, Inc. This item has been -- it will not be heard today. It will be readvertised and heard in the future at another meeting. We don't know yet what particular meeting, whether it will be here or maybe at the Board of County Commissioners, depending on the process they have to go through. And that leaves us with one item remaining on today's agenda, which is 4(C). We'll move the other item -- 3 on the agenda is Approval of Prior Minute Meetings. There are none. So obviously there won't be any to announce approval on. And that does take us then to 4(C). 4(C) is Petition DR-PL2016001391. The Petitioner is Tamiami Ford, Inc. It's for a site plan with deviations for their existing facility over in the Airport -Pulling Road/Mercantile Avenue area. All those wishing to testify, at this time please rise and be sworn in by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Are there any members of the public here, other than the applicants? (No response.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: No. Disclosures on my part, I have talked with the applicant's representative, Mr. Hood. I have talked with staff. The conversations mostly centered around clarification of exhibits that were to be used today. Staff did revise their recommendations, submitted a page today. The court reporter has a copy of it for the record. And there are two much clearer exhibits that were provided in response to the questions that I had raised previously. And those are my disclosures. And, Fred, since I have read everything and we have talked over the one -- a couple of issues that need to be clarified, I dot 'i have any other questions. Let me make sure of that. Justifications. The only clarification I would like to know is the staff recommendations that were revised and recently provided, do you have any objections to those? MR. HOOD: We don't. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. I don't have anymore questions. That's the only item I had to question. Everything seems to be cleared up in that regard. Is there a staff report? MR. SMITH: Thank you, Mr. Strain. Staff recommends approval of deviation DR -- the two deviations, DR-PL20160001391 with the changes for the architectural drawings on Exhibit SD -01, and for the landscaping exhibit, offer/plant material sheet one. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Thank you. Peter, I notice -- you're our resident architect. From your perspective -- and I like it when you attend so I can always ask you: Do you have any disagreement with staff s position on this or any part of the overall review? Page 2 of 3 March 23, 2107 HEX Minutes MR. SHAWINSKI: At this point I do not. HEARING ?-XAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Those are the only questions I have. Anybody else have anything else on the staffs side they want to comment? (No response.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Any members of the public that are here would like to speak on this matter? (No response.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Fred, unless you want to add something to the record, we'll close the meeting. And I will have a decision to you rather quickly. Technically no longer than 30 days, but I can tell you it will be quicker than that. MR. HOOD: Okay. Thank you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you. That takes us to our Other Business. There is none. Is there any members of the public here wishing to comment? (No response.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: No to that. This meeting is adjourned. Thank you. MR. HOOD: Thank you. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Hearing Examiner at 9:05 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER MARK STRAIN, HEARING EXAMINER ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK These minutes approved by the Hearing Examiner on , as presented or as corrected TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF U.S. LEGAL SUPPORT INC., BY KELLEY MARIE NADOTTI, RPR, FPR, COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY PUBLIC. Page 3 of 3 AGENDA ITEM 4-13 Co � er Count STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND ZONING ZONING DIVISION HEARING DATE: APRIL 13, 2017 SUBJECT: BDE-PL20160002220, 1692 VINLAND WAY BOAT DOCK EXTENSION PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Applicant: Brian Coe 1692 Vinland Way Naples, FL 34108 Agent: Patrick Steele Turrell, Hall & Associates 3584 Exchange Avenue Naples, FL 34104 REQUESTED ACTION: Owner: Headwaters Development LLLP PO Box 110062 Naples, FL 34108 The petitioner is requesting a 24 -foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet allowed by Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code, for a total protrusion of 44 feet, to accommodate a new docking facility. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject site is located on Lot 22, Landings at Bear's Paw, also described as 1692 Vinland Way. in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida (:See locution map on the following page). BDE-PL20160002220 Page 1 of 10 1692 Vinland Way - Dock Extension HEX Hearing April 13, 2017 c L :.',J'" - 3NV7 tI�AIN NOOL00 L �L 14un APD 5ald5N iF CL Ca 2 CD C .O N 1692 Vinland Way - Dock Extension HEX Hearing April 13, 2017 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The petitioner is proposing to construct a new boat dock and lift that protrudes 44 feet from the rear property line or 29 feet from the Mean High Water Level (MHWL) for a single 33 -foot vessel. The property, with a zoning designation of a PUD (The Landings at Bears Paw), is .15 acres and has 67 feet of water frontage. The side setbacks from the riparian lines will be 7.5 feet from the east riparian line and 7.5 feet from the west riparian line. The Landings at Bears Paw PUD Ordinance was approved in 2013 for a deviation (below) to allow for boat docks within a residential tract to have a minimum 7.5 -foo side setback instead of the LDC required 15 -foot setback provided the boat slip is parallel to the shore line see PUD Backup Exhibit on page 4). Deviation 94 seeks relief from LDC Section 5,03.06. E. 5., "Dock Facilities, " which requires dock, facilities to have a side setback of 15 feet for dock facilities on lots with greater than 60 feet of water frontage, to allow a 7.5 foot side setbacks for the private single-family community dock facilities located along that section of Golden Gate Canal within the Residential Tract; provided that such slips are parallel to (rather than perpendicular to) the shoreline. Neighboring residential homes, across the canal, have boat docks. There are also two (2) existing docks on the north side of the canal, east of this parcel for the PUD's community use. No dredging is proposed. On September 28, 2016, the Hearing Examiner approved a 24 -foot boat dock extension for the adjacent parcel to the west at 1688 Vinland Way. Aerial photo - Collier County GIS YWap BDE-PL20160002220 Page 3 of 10 1692 Vinland Way - Dock Extension HEX Hearing, April 13, 2017 ruu nacxup k xmit ruu nacKup hminit BDE-PL20160002220 Page 4 of 10 1692 Vinland Way - Dock Extension HEX Hearing April 13, 2017 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCEL: Single Family Residence with a zoning designation of Landings at Bear Paw SURROUNDING: North: Utility, golf course with a zoning designation of The Landings at Bear Paw PUD East: Single-family home with a zoning designation of The Landings at Bear Paw PUD South: Canal, single family homes with a zoning designation of RSF4 West: Single-family home with a zoning designation of The Landings at Bear Paw PUD ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Section 5.03.06 J.4 of the LDC requires the petitioner to demonstrate how the proposed location of the dock minimizes impacts to seagrass beds and other native shoreline vegetation. Submerged resource survey was provided. No seagrasses or mangroves present. EAC review not required. STAFF COMMENTS: The Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny, a dock facility extension request based on the following criteria under Section 5.03.06 H. of the LDC. In order for the HEX to approve this request, it must be determined that at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria have been met. Staff has reviewed this petition in accordance with Section 5.03.06 H of the LDC and finds the following: PRIMARY CRITERIA Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. This is a single-family use and the applicant contends that one slip is being used, as depicted, according to the plan. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) BDE-PL20160002220 Page 5 of 10 1692 Vinland Way - Dock Extension HEX Hearing April 13, 2017 Criterion met. According to the petitioner's application and scaled drawings submitted, rip rap exists approximately 25 feet from the property line, and the water depth is 2.1 -foot MLW and still over rip -rap. There is not adequate depth to accommodate the mooring of the proposed vessel within the LDC required 20 -foot protrusion limit. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion met. According to the information submitted by the petitioner, the proposed dock facility will not adversely impact navigation because there is 120 feet between MHWL and MHWL. The entire waterway is used for navigation as there are no navigational markers indicating the exact tread of navigation. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion met if measuring from MHWL. Criterion not met if measuring from property line. The information provided in the application indicates that the proposed dock/lift will protrude 44 feet into a waterway from the property line, and 29 feet from the MHWL. The shoreline (MHWL) to shoreline measurement is 120 feet. Therefore the dock facility will protrude approximately 24 percent into the waterway width, as measured from the MHWL, and 36 percent as measured from the property line. There is a boat dock directly across from this proposal. For the Landings at Bears Paw PUD the MHWL is the most restrictive point in determining protrusion into the waterway. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. As shown in the drawings submitted by the petitioner, the proposed dock, boat lift, and vessel will be located adjacent to a lot that received a boat dock extension similar to this proposal. The proposed dock facility will provide a 7.5 -foot setback from the east riparian line, and a 7.5 foot setback from the west riparian line. The approved PUD for the Landings at Bears Paw development only requires a 7.5 -foot setback from the riparian lines. Based on these setbacks, the docks will be 30 feet apart. With the dock design having the boat "on the canal side" of the docking facility, staff does not foresee any issues. BDE-PL20160002220 Page 6 of 10 1692 Vinland Way - Dock Extension HEX Hearing April 13, 2017 SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. The proposed dock facility is primarily governed by the County guidelines and the approved PUD for Landings at Bear's Paw. The one special condition that has affected the overall proposed dock design was the relatively high "Top of Bank" elevation and the associated large rip -rap shoreline. Due to this condition, the proposed access walkway portion of the dock needs to protrude further out into the waterway in order to reach adequate water depths. The other restrictive condition written within the approved PUD documents only allows for the proposed boat slip to be parallel to the shoreline. This doesn't necessarily mean the dock has to protrude 44 feet into the waterway; a protrusion less than 44 feet would be adequate if not for the boat lift. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Criterion not met. The proposed design provides adequate and safe access to and from the vessel while allowing room for other recreational use like fishing and kayak/paddle board storage on the dock. In staff s opinion, this design may be excessive considering a dock can be designed 15 feet less in length then the proposed 51 -foot wide dock. Because of the additional storage area (see illustration below), the dock becomes more of a boat deck, which may be considered excessive for the intent of the LDC. Staff must consider the original intent of the Code in determining this criterion. If the intent of the Code is to minimize the impacts upon the waterways while still providing safe access to the vessel, then this criterion, base on the propose design, has not been met. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion met. The proposed dock facility has been designed to accommodate one vessel up to 33 feet which is less than 50% the subject property's linear waterfront footage of 67 feet. BDE-PL20160002220 Page 7 of 10 1692 Vinland Way - Dock Extension HEX Hearing April 13, 2017 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The proposed dock facility will be the second of potentially 10 other single-family docking facilities allowed to be constructed along this shoreline. The proposed dock has been designed within the designated setback area as outlined in the approved PUD document for this development. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(I) of the LDC must be demonstrated). Criterion met. There are no seagrass beds present on the property or the neighboring properties within 200' of the existing dock structure. BDE-PL20160002220 Page 8 of 10 1692 Vinland Way - Dock Extension HEX Hearing April 13, 2017 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) Criterion not applicable. The proposed work is a single-family dock facility and therefore not subject to Manatee Protection Requirements. Staff analysis indicates that the request meets the five primary criteria. With regard to the six secondary criteria, one of the criteria is found to be not applicable, and the request meets four of the remaining five secondary criteria. The applicant's primary reason for a boat dock extension is for the existing rip rap extending approximately 25 feet beyond the rear property line. However the proposed design has not met the conditions of the. secondary criteria regarding excess dock design. The proposed design is larger than what could be considered adequate for a boat 33 feet long. This proposal does not meet Secondary Criterion 2 regarding excessive deck area. A 36 - foot wide dock should be adequate in mooring this vessel. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the Hearing Examiner takes action, any party may appeal such final action to the Board of County Commissioners. Such appeal shall be filed with the Growth Management Division Administrator within 30 days of the action by the Hearing Examiner. In the event that the petition has been approved by the Hearing Examiner, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30 -day period. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for BDE-PL20160002220 on March 16, 2017. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner APPROVE Petition BDE-PL20160002220 subject to the following conditions: 1. Eliminate the Kayak deck storage and reduce the dock width from 51 feet to 36 feet. Attachment: 1 Applicant's application and backup material BDE-PL20160002220 Page 9 of 10 1692 Vinland Way - Dock Extension HEX Hearing April 13, 2017 PREPARED BY: PRINCIPAL PLANNER ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: /01* -4 � �- Z�-- ---- RAYMO V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER ZONING DIVISION MICHAEL BOSI, AICP. DIRECTOR ZONING DIVISION BDE-PL20160002220 1692 Vinland Way - Dock Extension HEX Hearing April 13, 2017 v� 3 DATE 3 t 4 DATE �3 - r s- +') DATE BDE APPLICATION C OE DOCK 1692 VINLAND WAY NAPLES, FL 34105 REV JANUARY 2017 PREPARED BY: TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE, STE B NAPLES, FL 34104 Attachment 1 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net Cofer County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION OR BOATHOUSE ESTABLISHMENT PETITION APPLICATION AND SUBMITTAL INSTRUCTIONS LDC Section 5.03.06 Chapter 3 S. of the Administrative Code The following information is intended to guide the applicant through the application and public hearing process for a Dock Facility Extension or Boathouse Establishment Petition. Prior to submitting the Dock Facility Extension or Boathouse Establishment Petition application, the applicant shall attend a pre -application meeting to determine if a dock facility extension or boathouse establishment is available and to discuss the location, length/protrusion, and configuration of the proposed boat dock facility. The pre -application fee is $500.00 and will be credited toward application fee upon submittal. If the application is not submitted within 9 months of the pre -application meeting the pre -app fee will be forfeited and will not be credited toward the application fee. In order for the application to be processed, all accompanying materials (see attached submittal checklist) shall be completed and submitted with the application. The application fee for a Dock Facility Extension or Boathouse Establishment is $1,500.00, plus $925.00 for required legal advertising. 0 After submission of the completed application packet, accompanied with the required fees, the applicant will receive a response notifying that the petition is being processed. Accompanying that response will be a receipt for the payment and the tracking number (i.e., BDE- PL20120000000) assigned to the petition. This petition tracking number should be noted on all future correspondence regarding the petition. Pursuant to the LDC and the Administrative Code, several public notice requirements shall be completed within the required time frames. The Planning and Zoning Department will provide, at the cost of the applicant, legal notification to surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the subject property and newspaper advertisement (required 15 days prior to the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing date). The applicant will be notified by email of the hearing date and will receive a copy of the Staff Report. It is recommended, but not required, that the applicant or the agent attend the Hearing Examiner hearing. Please contact the Growth Management Division at 252-2400 for further assistance completing this application. 6/3/2014 Page 1 of 7 • 0 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 DOCK FACILITY EXTENSION OR BOATHOUSE ESTABLISHMENT PETITION LDC Section 5.03.06 Ch. 3 B. of the Administrative Code THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one):■❑ DOCK EXTENSION ❑ BOATHOUSE PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT INFORMATION Applicant(s): Brian Coe Address: 1692 Vinland Way City: Naples State: EL ZIP: 34105 Telephone: Cell: 970-581-0983 Fax: E -Mail Address: bcoe6587@corncast.net Name of Agent: Jeff Rogers Firm: Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Address: 3584 Exchange Ave City: Naples Telephone: 239-643-0166 Cell: 239-784-0081 E -Mail Address: Jeff@turrell-associates.com PROPERTY LOCATION Section/Township/Range: 35 49/ 25 Subdivision: Landings at Bear's Paw Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 1692 Vinland Way State: FL ZIP: 34104 Fax: 239-643-6632 Property I.D. Number: 54490010588 Unit: Lot: 22 Block: Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: RPUD BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 6/3/2014 Page 2 of 7 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net Co er Gounty 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): To construct a new single-family docking facility along the man-made portion of the Gordon River. The proposed dock is approximately 639 square feet with one optional boat lift which will protrude approximately 44 -feet from the top of bank, We are requesting a 24 -foot extension from the allowable 20 -feet. Per the approved PUD the land owner is limited on the allowable dock design SITE INFORMATION 1. Waterway Width: 120 ft. Measurement fromE] plat ❑ survey ❑ visual estimate ■R other (specify) aerial 2. Total Property Water Frontage: 67 ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 7.5 & 7.5 ft. Required: 7.5 & 7.5 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 44 ft. 5. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. 36 ft. 2. ft. 3. ft. 6. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: There are numerous other docking facilities on this waterway to the east and southwest of this property. All of which protrude approximately 30' to 50' out into the same waterway. 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? 0.15 Acres 8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes X No if yes, please provide copies. . 6/3/2014 Page 3 of 7 Zoning Land Use N RPUD Landings at Bears Paw S A Golden Gate Canal E RSF-4 Residential Single -Family W P Gordon River Greenway Park DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): To construct a new single-family docking facility along the man-made portion of the Gordon River. The proposed dock is approximately 639 square feet with one optional boat lift which will protrude approximately 44 -feet from the top of bank, We are requesting a 24 -foot extension from the allowable 20 -feet. Per the approved PUD the land owner is limited on the allowable dock design SITE INFORMATION 1. Waterway Width: 120 ft. Measurement fromE] plat ❑ survey ❑ visual estimate ■R other (specify) aerial 2. Total Property Water Frontage: 67 ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 7.5 & 7.5 ft. Required: 7.5 & 7.5 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 44 ft. 5. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. 36 ft. 2. ft. 3. ft. 6. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: There are numerous other docking facilities on this waterway to the east and southwest of this property. All of which protrude approximately 30' to 50' out into the same waterway. 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? 0.15 Acres 8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes X No if yes, please provide copies. . 6/3/2014 Page 3 of 7 UPDATED PRIMARY CRITERIA c: c: The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff In determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing • Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Response: The total waterfront length for this property is 67ft. The zoning and upland land use is single family residential which warrants no more than 2 slips per CC -LDC as well as the approved PUD. The current proposed dock design has 1 optional boat slip. 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) Response: See attached survey/drawing illustrating the existing water depths. The 20 foot is protrusion line from the Top of Bank has a water depth of approximately 2.1' MLW and is above the existing rip -rap. Therefore there is insufficient water depths to moor a vessel or provide safe access to the docking facility within the 20 -foot protrusion mark. 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Response: The proposed docking facility will not have any adverse impacts on navigation as it will only protrude 29' from the MHWL into the waterway that is approximately 120' wide from MHWL to MHWL. The entire waterway is used for navigation as there are no navigational markers indicating the exact thread of navigation. The proposed docking facility provides adequate space for navigation through this waterway as well as provides sufficient space for a dock to be built across the waterway from the subject property and still provide adequate space for navigation. 4. Whether r,r not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) r1 U Response: The proposed docking facility protrudes approximately 44' from the property line into a • waterway that is 75' wide from property line to property line. This correlates to approximately 59% protrusion into the waterway and therefore, as proposed, the dock does not maintain the required percentages based on the criteria. Taking our protrusion measurements from our property line to the property lines across the waterway which extend out to the middle of the waterway Is not an accurate measurement for the actual width of the waterway. As shown on the property appraiser website the neighbors across the waterway own the bottom lands extending out to approximately 50% width of the waterway. Taking the width of waterway measurement from our property line to the others across the waterway will not indicate the true width of the waterway. Therefore we have provided the actual width of the waterway (MHW to MHW) as stated above. 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not in6a£re with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Response: The proposed dock facility will provide 7.5' setbacks from the property/riparian lines. The approved PUD for the Landings at Bears Paw development only requires 7.5' setbacks for a docking facility, if parallel to the shoreline. The dock design and location has been designed to be located withic., Ahe required setbacks, provide safe access and not interfere with any future neighboring docking facilities that maybe constructed. • r� COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net Co�Gounty 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 SECONDARY CRITERIA 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (if seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.061 must be demonstrated.) 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) 6/3/2014 Page 5 of 7 .7 • • 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject • property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. ('here must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Response: The proposed dock facility was primarily governed by the County guidelines and the approved PUD for Landings at Bear's Paw. The one special condition that has affected the overall proposed dock design was the high elevation and size of the existing rip -rap shoreline. Due to this condition the proposed access walkway portion of the dock needs to protrude further out into the waterway in order to decrease the access walkway's slope and reach adequate water depths. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Response: The proposed dock facility has been minimized in order to meet the County dock building guidelines as well as to be within the 25% width of waterway. The proposed design still provides adequate and safe access to and from the vessel while still allowing room for other recreational use like fishing and kayak/paddle board storage on the dock. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Response: The proposed dock facility has been designed to only moor one vessel up to 33 -feet which is less than 50% tkie subject property's linear waterfront footage. Therefore this criteria is met. • 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) Response: The proposed dock facility will be one of the first of potentially 11 other single-family docking facilities allowed to be along this shoreline. The proposed dock has been designed within the designated setback area as outlined in the approved PUD document for this development. The proposed docking facility design is consistent with others on this waterway, matches the previously approved Kellam Dock design (BD-PL20150002584) and will not affect neighboring properties view of the waterway. 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.061 must be demonstrated.) Response: There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200' of the existing dock structure. 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) Response: Tlie 'proposed work is a single-family dock facility and therefore not subject to Manatee Protection Requirements. • CO er COunty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 • www,colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: ❑■ Dock Extension Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 6 ❑ Signed and Sealed Survey ❑ ❑ ❑ Chart of Site Waterway El Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed 6 ❑ ❑ facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 F] El Completed Addressiag Checklist 1 ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials 1 ❑ ❑ to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 6/3/2014 Page 6 of 7 • .54LC�0=ty . COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2804 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.WRiergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 2525358 • PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ® Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Meeting Si n -In Sheet Addressing: Annls Moxam Gra hies: Marlam Ocheltree qty of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Historical Review ❑ Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -in Sheet ❑ Immokelee Water/Sewer District: Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Parks and Reaction: Vicky Ahmad County Attorney's Office: Heldl Ashton-Clcko Lj Transportation Pathways: Stacey Revey ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock Engineering: Alison Bradford Transportation Planning: John Podezerwinsky ❑ Other. 1. ❑ I Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen FEE REQUIREMENTS: C Boat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.00 An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is Included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal Information may result in the delay of processing this petition. p13/� Signature of Petitioner or Agent Daie 0 6/3/2014 Page 7 of 7 FOAFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION 49 R,�PETITION NUMBERS(S) 1, lit i i? Nl•Ce, (print name), as (title, if applicable) of (company, If a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner© applicant tract purchesermand that: I. i have full authority to secure the approvals) requested end to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. AM answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true, 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property wilt be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Wall euthorae to act as ourlmy representative in any matters regarding this petition Including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pace. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (LLC.) or Limited Company (LC.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's 'Managing Member.' • if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • K the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner' of the named partnership. • N the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the wads 'as trustee'. • In each Instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then • use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was swom to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on AO/1-7/16 (date) by 74f i -' h c9- (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as who is personally known to me or who has produced Fl- Di Li (type of identification) as identification. r l svwPMEAL Signafd-m of Notary Pu Ic IJEILtrUBgQ1 3a7 MYOF00412 EXPIRE& Ock6w Soo, 2017 604*d7WNftpyAklA y Came-CoA-otrsu55 REV 3aV14 UPDATED EXHIBITS e e .ow. 0 U Z a0 C7 z� Z 018 , 4 lu N w 2 N 0,e)Q-'p LL p J� QZ 0 LuCD °ope SV CO � ` 1 !�� � � i � , •fir a' �C (9 +PDQ O d IV �O 6A V V V Ul Nom,. .ow. 0 U FI-1AI»lJ F Z a0 C7 z� Z 018 lu N w 2 N 0,e)Q-'p LL p J� QZ 0 LuCD °ope SV CO Z 3 �Zp W In p w N W D , �C (9 +PDQ O d IV �O 6A V V V FI-1AI»lJ F W z J W a O w OL w N N H N 0 W w w >z N p:�O805.imae p L n W Z J I d' W CL 0 Ir a - z z oma XLLit LU 0 In 0 Q 0 R M a cr W \Z CL J g Z \ Q a < a aLL \ O W 0 0000s J, 'o-- \ i r QRZ R 0 ao fra CL N N �0 � o LL 00 d Zy L4 � J m7z si CL 4 LL IA CCE 6OUH7Y.&, PROPOSED W DEPTHS 7AU1017 N y Y Y 2N � � bzyyzf Q �] �s p nXp QW3 � 4�Ti j Q i10 w >zD crHil Z o ap ra wD SO2J �a W� W W Q O 4 F YKN CgL 464 y2 {J4t til w M' w Q L O J '.. �� tea¢ �0 I� a w' O, � 0 w` O a W a 0 ,• a oc OR z N N N N C) is z Z- Z 2 0 N � N ��o �?o z�w i�w � LY oiw '72w 2 a dao z 0 p` Y N W , I tz J Q m z O z 0- o J O N a w z J J � Y W a O °z o a = w W U- W an an 5 m ? O F -WO (0 m J Q JWO tl 9 a. rx LL O W O H N N Q G V1 J Ilk- Q A LL +[ Z V1 t gw z OL "�z 26 V" I �2VN & P LU J w m Y 00 o w- i> Fa z PRE -APPLICATION MEETING NOTES • 0 • C7 • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 28DO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collieraov.net (239) 2S2-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: Boat Dock Extension Date and Time. 9113116 Assigned Planner: Dan1el James Smith Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): PrgJect Information Project Name: PL #: Pt_20160002220(BDE) Property ID #: 54490010588 Current Zoning: Project Address: 1692 Vinland Way, Naples City: State: Zip: Applicant: Agent Name: Jeff Rogers Phone: Agent/Firm Address: City: State: Zip: Property Owner: Please provide the following, if applicable: 1. Total Acreage: Ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: Ili. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please Indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2$00 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 3+4104 v 6mL,colllerxov.nct (239) 2SZ-2400 Meeting Notes i i mll�rl i 0 Co*r County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.cogieraov.net (239) 2S2-2400 Meeting Notes 0 Civfter County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliermoy.net (239) 252-2400 Meeting Notes, • 0 • o e- Gclumty COLDER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.tolliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: {239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and inai Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Dock Extension Boathouse Chapter 3 B. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting, and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) Signed and Sealed Survey ❑ Chart of Site Waterway Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed 6 ❑ facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 [� Completed Addressing Checkiist 1 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials 1 ( ❑ to be submitted electronically in PDF format. !� ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 0 6/3/2014 Page 6 of 7 Co ,er CoKnty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 28W NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ Sayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet Addressing: Annis Moxam Graphics: Mariam Ocheltree ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Historical Review C] Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -in Sheet ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko _ Transportation Pathways: Stacey Revay 4 �� ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock _ Engineering: Alison Bradford _ Transportation Planning: John Podaerwins ❑ Other: ❑ Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen FEE REQUIREMENTS: Boat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: ;g2S- 8 %2 5 C; An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to Include all necessary submittal information may result in the delay of processing this petition. Signature of Petitioner or Agent Date • • 6/3/2014 Page 7 of 7 0 • • c4fler County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collier"v.net 2500 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (234)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMQ Aaoressing@co1hergov ne or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be lWalid W Not as items wig apply to every projea hems in bold type are required FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklis for each Petition type) � BLBissti Permit ❑ SDP (Ste Development Pion) L•J 80 (Boat c Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit D SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site improvement Pian) EXP (Excavation Permit) D SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lit Line Adjustment) SNC (Street Name Change — UnpletteO Q PNC (Project Name Change) TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans S Plat Review) VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Ste Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy desedp4on may be attached) LANDINGS AT BEAR'S PAW LOT 22,_: FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(*) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description it more than one) 54490010588 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 1892 Vinland Way • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of projeWsite in relstion to nearest public road right- of-way . SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Coe Dock PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Coe Dock PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sores only) SDP - or AR or PL # F i com"ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT !� -�. 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.eoliierxgv.net 1239) 252-2400 FAX (2391252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (it application: indicate whether proposed or existing) Coe Dock at Landings at Bear's Paw Phase Return Approved Checklist By: ❑r Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Jeff Rogers Jeff@thanaples.com Phone: 239-643-0166 Emall/Fax:239-643-6632 Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number u u % b Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: q .a---. -t/ Date:+ ! 2/2016 Updated by: t Dab: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEIN FORM SUBMITTED 0 Cla r +County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collleraov.net (239) 252-2400 Prls-Application Meetlno, I n In S, `PL Collier County Contact Information: r1 L _J 0 Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Richard Anderson Environmental Specialist 252-2483 richardanderson@colliergov.net David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net ❑ Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque@colliergov.net ❑ Steve Baluch, P.E. Transportation Planning 252-2361 StephenBaluch@colliergov.net ❑ Laurie Beard Transportation Pathways 252-5782 Lauriebeard@colliergov.net Rachel Beasley Planner 252-8202 rachelbeasle @collier ov.net ❑ Marcus Berman County Surveyor 252-6885 MarcusSerman@coIliergov.net ❑ Madelin Bunster Architectural Review 252-8523 madelinbunster@colliergov.net ❑ Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5165 rnarkburtchin@colliergov.net ❑ George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543-georgecascio@colliergov.net ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heldiashton@colliergov.net ❑ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 suefaulkner@collie ov.net ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Site Plans Reviewer 252-2434 eridey@colliergov.net ❑ Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman@colliergov.net ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundiach@collier&ov.net ❑ Shar HingLon East Naples Fire District 687-5650 shingson@ccfco.or ❑ John Houldsworth Services 252-5757 johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net ❑ JodiHughes —Engineering Transportation Pathways 252-5744 lodihughes@colliergov.net ❑ Alicia Humphries Site Plans Reviewer ROW 252-2326 aliciahumphries@collier ov.net ❑ Eric Johnson, AICP,CFM Zoning Services 252-2931 eriLjohnson@colifergov.net ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall@colliergoy.net ❑ Stephen Lenberger _ Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger@colliergov.net ❑ Paulo Martirs ' Utilities 252-1285 paulomartins@colliergoy.net ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Fire Safety 252-7348 Thomasmastroberto@colNergov.net ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 jackmckenna@colliergov.net ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmclean@colliergov.net ❑ Gilbert Moncivalz Utility Impact Fees 252-4215 gilbertmoncivaiz@colliergov.net ❑ Annis Moxam Addressin 252-5519 annismxam@collie!]Iov.net ❑ Stefanie Nawrocki Planning and Zonin 252-2313 StefanieNawrocki@colliergov.net ❑ Mariam Ocheltree Graphics 252-2315 mariamocheltree@collierg2v.net ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brand otero@collier ov.net r1 L _J 0 Pi • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT w, r.co[l eTttay.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 ❑ Brandi Pollard " Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipoiiard@collier og v.net C1 Fred Reischl, AICP Zoning Services 2524211 fredreischl@colliergov.net () Start' Revay Transportation Pathwa s 252-5677 stn revs @colliergov.net ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Utility Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenblum@coll!e�rgov.net ...._ U Michael Snw�rer� C� Corby Schmidt, AICP Zoning Services _ Comprehensive Planning 252-2925 252-2944 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net corbyschmidt@colliergov.net ❑ Chris Scott, Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net _AICP Daniel Smith, AICP Landscape Review 252-4312 danielsmith@colller ov.net ❑ Ellen Summers Planning and Zoning 252-1032 ElienSummers@colliergov.net ❑ Scott Stone Assistant County Attorn 252-8400 scottstone@coliier ov.net _,_ C) Mark Strain Hearin Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 -252-5366 _markstrain@collier ov.net 0 Kris VanLen en UtilityPlanning krisvanlengen@colliergov.net ❑ Jon Walsh _�_.. Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwaish@colliergov.net ❑ David Weeks, AICP future Land Use Conslstency 252-2306 davidweeks@collier ov.net ®.Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net ❑ Christine WI11ou h$ by Planning and Zoning, 252-5748 ChristineWillouuhb @colliergov.net Additional Attendee Contact Information: SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY • C 0 0 COE DOCK 1692 VINLAND WAY NAPLES, FL 34105 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY AUGUST 11, 2016 • PREPARED BY: >-n S-* TURRELL, HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE, STE B NAPLES, FL 34104 • COE DOCK SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY AUGUST 12, 2016 1.0 INTRODUCTION The COE residence and associated proposed docking facility is located at 1692 Vinland Way, identified by Parcel Number 54490010588. The property is just south of Golden Gate Parkway, just west of the Gordon River Greenway property, bound to the east by another single-family residence, and bound to the south by the Gordon River. The property is located in Section 35, Township 49 South, and Range 25 East. The upland portion of the property is a single-family residence. Turrell, Hall & Associates was contracted to provide environmental permitting services and one aspect is the associated Submerged Resource Survey (SRS). This survey will provide planning and review assistance to both owners and agency reviewers in regards to proposed project. The proposed project consists of constructing a single-family dock along the Gordon River. The SRS survey was conducted on August 12, 2016. Light east winds, clear skies, and a high tide resulted in visible access to the entire project area. Surface water conditions on this day were calm which also helped to provide fair environmental conditions for the survey. The water temperature was 85°F. Low tide occurred at 5:23 A.M (1.3') and high tide occurred at 11:23 A.M (3.2') on the date of the survey. 2.0 OBJECTIVE • The objective of the submerged resource survey was to identify and locate any existing submerged resources within 200' of the proposed project. The survey provided onsite environmental information to help determine if the proposed project would impact any existing submerged resources and if so would assist in reconfiguring the proposed dock in order to minimize any impacts. The general scope of work performed at the site is summarized below. • Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel conducted a site visit and I snorkeled these transects within the proposed project basin and verified the location of any submerged resources. • Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel identified submerged resources at the site, estimated the % of coverage, and delineated the approximate limits of any submerged resources observed. • Turrell, Hall & Associates personnel delineated limits via a handheld GPS (Garmin Model 76csx). Page 1 of 3 0 COE DOCK SUBMERGED REsoURCE SURVEY AUGUST 12, 2016 • 3.0 METHODOLOGY Turrell, Hall & Associates biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the SRS to cover the entire property shoreline for the proposed dock installation. The components for this survey included: • Review of aerial photography of survey area • Establish survey transects lines overlaid onto aerials • Physically swim transects, GPS locate limits of submerged resources, and determine approximate percent of coverage • Document and photograph all findings The surveyed area was evaluated systematically by following the established transects spaced approximately 10 -feet apart as shown on the attached exhibit. The adjacent properties have a few existing docks which provided easily identifiable reference markers, such as dock piles which assisted in locating transects and keeping them consistent throughout most of the survey area. One biologist swam these transects using snorkel equipment where needed within the . surveyed area. The other individual assisted with compiling notes and documenting findings on aerials. Located submerged resources were photographed, the approximate percent of coverage was quantified, and the location was delineated on an aerial photo as well as confirmed via handheld GPS (Garmin Model 72H). The biologists used a half meter square quadrant further broken into sections by cordage to make coverage estimates easier. • 4.0 RESULTS The substrate found within the surveyed area included two distinct classifications; silt sand with shell debris and just silt/ muck material scattered throughout. These substrates were found scattered throughout the entire surveyed area. There was also scattered shell and numerous rip -rap rocks scattered along the property shoreline. The shoreline consisted of a rip -rap shoreline which provides habitat for fish, crabs, and some barnacles, growing on and around the rocks. The majority of the survey area exhibited a silt/muck bottom that was devoid of any aquatic vegetation growth or any types of submerged resources. The lack of any submerged resources is most likely due to the overall water quality within the Gordon River as well as the water clarity not allowing much sunlight penetration. This was most evident in the deeper water depths. Page 2 of 3 COE DOCK SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY AUGUST 12, 2016 Various filamentous algae and macro algae were observed and documented growing • along the bottom sediments throughout the survey area. Also observed were numerous fish species during the survey and a list of these species has been prepared and is provided below as Table 1. Table l — Observed Fish Species Common Name Scientific Name mangrove snapper Lu Janus griseus sheepshead Archosargus probatocephalus s«iped mullet Mugil cephalus snook Centrompus undecimalis 5.0 CONCLUSIONS The submerged resource survey at the site yielded few findings. A few barnacles were observed growing on the rip -rap shoreline. The subject property shoreline consists of scattered rip -rap rock which provides natural cover for marine life. The rip -rap area was where all the observed fish species were located including: Gray Snapper (Luyanus griseus), Sheepshead (Archosargus probatocephalus), Stripped Mullet (Mugil cephalus), and a few Common Snooks (Centropomus undecimalis). • Negative impacts to submerged resources are not expected with the proposed docking facility installation. Page 3 of 3 • DEP/ACOS PERMT • • 0 to Florida Department of Environmental Protection Bob Martinez Center 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee, Florida 32399-2400 Rick Scott Governor. Carlos Lopez-Cantera Lt. Governor Jonathan P. Steverson Secretary FEDERAL SPGP SELF CERTIFICATION FOR A PROJECT AT A PRIVATE, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE Self Certification File No.: 0346941001 EE File Name: 1692 Vinland Way Naples, FL 34105 - Self Cert Exempt Dock with Boat Lift(s) (General) Dear PATRICK SCHEELE: On, 08/25/2016, you used the Florida Department of Environmental • Protection's electronic Self Certification Process to certify compliance with the terms and conditions of the Federal State Programmatic General Permit (SPEP) Self Certification Process for a project at private, single-family residence located at: LAT - Degrees: 26 Minutes: 10 Seconds: 1.1195 LONG - Degrees: -81 Minutes: 46 Seconds: 51.3817 SITE ADDRESS: 1692 Vinland Way Naples, FL 34105 COUNTY: Collier For: Brian Coe 6587 Ridgeline Dr Timnath, CO 80547 You have certified that the project you propose to construct at the above location meets all the conditions of the SPGP Self Certification Process and will be built in conformance to those conditions (attached for reference). Your proposed activity as certified is in compliance with the SPGP program. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) Specific conditions apply to your project, attached. No further permitting for this activity is required by the Corps. In the event of the transfer of ownership of the property by sale or by any other means, when the structures or work authorized by this SPGP Self Certification are still in existence at the time the property is transferred, the terms and conditions of this SPGP Self Certification will continue to be binding on the new owner(s)of the property. Although the construction period for works authorized by Department of the Army permits is finite, the permit itself, with its limitations, does not expire. To validate the transfer of this SPGP Self Certification and the associated responsibilities associated with compliance with its terms and conditions, the attached transfer of SPGP Self Certification request must be completed and submitted to the Department at the time of transfer of ownership. The address is given below on the attached transfer form. This SPGP Self Certification is based solely on the information you provided under this process, and applies only to the statutes and rules in effect when your certification was completed. You have recognized that your certification is effective only for the specific project proposed, and provided the project is constructed, operated, and maintained in conformance with all the terms, conditions, and limitations stated in the SPGP Self Certification Process. This Self Certification will not apply if any substantial modifications are made to the project. You agree to contact the Department for review of any plans to construct additional structures or to modify the project, as changes may result in a permit being required. You have acknowledged that this Self Certification will automatically expire if - I . construction of the project is not completed by midnight, July 25, 2021, unless construction commenced or a contract to construct was executed before July 25, 2021, in which case the time limit for completing the work authorized by the SPGP ends at midnight, July 25, 2022. However, in no case can construction continue for more than one year beyond the Self -Certification date; 2. site conditions materially change; 3. the terms, conditions, and limitations of the Self Certification are not followed; or 4. the governing statutes or rules are amended before construction of the project. Completion of the Self Certification constitutes your authorization for Department or Corps personnel to enter the property for purposes of inspecting for compliance. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION This Self Certification Process does not relieve you from the responsibility of obtaining other permits or authorizations from other agencies (federal, state, or local) that may be required for the project. Failure to obtain all applicable authorizations prior to construction of the project may result in enforcement. If you have any qui scions, please contact your local Department District Office. Contact information can be found at: http:/jww-w,.dep.state.fl.us/watei* ',uetlands/doesister—contacts.pdf. For further information, contact the Corps directly at: http://www,siki,usace.ari-ny,mil/Missions/Regulatory.aspx, When referring to your project, please use the SPGP Self Certification file number listed above. Authority for review - an agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers entitled Coordination Agreement between the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers (Jacksonville District) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection State Programmatic General Permit, Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbor Act of 1899 and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act". Enclosures: General Conditions Further Information Manatee Conditions Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Conditions Marsh and Mangroves Conditions Sea Turtle and Smalltooth Sawfish Construction Conditions Special Conditions 0 CONDITIONS FOR DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY SELF CERTIFIED STATE PROGRAMMATIC GENERAL PERMIT FOR A PROJECT AT A PRIVATE, SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE General Conditions: • 1. The time limit for completing the work authorized on July 25, 2021. 2. You must maintain the activity authorized by this permit in good condition and in conformance with the terms and conditions of this permit. You are not relieved of this requirement if you abandon the permitted activity, although you may make a good faith transfer to a third party in compliance with General Condition 4 below. Should you wish to cease to maintain the authorized activity or should you desire to abandon it without a good faith transfer, you must obtain a modification of this permit from this office, which may require restoration of the area. 3. If you discover any previously unknown historic or archeological remains while accomplishing the activity authorized by this permit, you must immediately notify this office of what you have found. We will initiate the Federal and State coordination required to determine if the remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places, 4. If you sell the property associated with this permit, you must obtain the signature of the new owner on the enclosed form and forward a copy of the permit to this office to validate the transfer of this authorization. 5. If a conditioned water quality certification has been issued for your project, you must comply with the conditions specified in the certification as special conditions to this permit. 6. You must allow representatives from this office to inspect the authorized activity at any time deemed • necessary to ensure that it is being or has been accomplished in accordance with the terms and conditions of your permit. Further Information: 1. Limits of this authorization. 1. This permit does not obviate the need to obtain other Federal, State, or local authorizations required by law. 2. This permit does not grant any property rights or exclusive privileges. 3. This permit does not authorize any injury to the property or rights of others. 4. This permit does not authorize interference with any existing or proposed Federal projects. 2. Limits of Federal Liability. In issuing this permit, the Federal Government does not assume any liability for the following: 1. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of other permitted or unpermitted activities or from natural causes. 2. Damages to the permitted project or uses thereof as a result of current or future activities . undertaken by or on behalf of the United States in the public interest. 3. Damages to persons, property, or to other permitted or unpermitted activities or structures caused • by the activity authorized by this permit. 4. Design or Construction deficiencies associated with the permitted work. 5. Damage claims associated with any future modification, suspension, or revocation of this permit. 3. Reliance on Applicant's Data: The determination of this office that issuance of this permit is not contrary to the public interest was made in reliance on the information you provided. 4. Reevaluation of Permit Decision: This office may reevaluate its decision on this permit at any time the circumstances warrant. Circumstances that could require a reevaluation include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. You fail to comply with the terms and conditions of this permit. 2. The information provided by you in support of your permit application proves to have been false, incomplete, or inaccurate (see 3 above). 3. Significant new information surfaces which this office did not consider in reaching the original public interest decision. 5. Such a reevaluation may result in a determination that it is appropriate to use the suspension, modification, and revocation procedures contained in 33 CFR 325.7 or enforcement procedures such as those contained in 33 CFR 326.4 and 326.5. The referenced enforcement procedures provide for the • issuance of an administrative order requiring you comply with the terms and conditions of your permit and for the initiation of legal action where appropriate. You will be required to pay for any corrective measures ordered by this office, and if you fail to comply with such directive, this office may in certain situations (such as those specified in 33 CER 209.170) accomplish the corrective measures by contract or otherwise and bill you for the cost. 6. When the structures or work authorized by this permit are still in existence at the time the property is transferred, the terms and conditions of this permit will continue to be binding on the new owner(s) of the property, To validate the transfer of this permit and the associated liabilities associated with compliance with its terms and conditions, have the transferee sign and date the enclosed form. 7. The Permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States require the removal, relocation, or other alteration, of the structures or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the Secretary of the Army or his authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the Permittee will be required, upon due notice from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States. No claim shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal, relocation or alteration. Manatee Conditions: 1. All personnel associated with the project will be instructed about the presence of manatees and • manatee speed zones, and the need to avoid collisions with and injury to manatees. The permittee will advise all construction personnel that there are civil and criminal penalties for harming, harassing, or killing manatees which are protected under the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the Endangered v- Species Act. and the Florida Manatee Sanctuary Act. 2. All vessels associated with the construction project will operate at "Idle Speed/No Wake" at all times . while in the immediate area and while in water where the draft of the vessel provides less than a four -foot clearance from the bottom. All vessels will follow routes of deep water whenever possible. 3. Siltation or turbidity barriers will be made of material in which manatees cannot become entangled, will be properly secured, and will be regularly monitored to avoid manatee entanglement or entrapment. Barriers must not impede manatee movement. 4. All on-site project personnel are responsible for observing water -related activities for the presence of manatee(s). All in -water operations, including vessels, must be shutdown if a manatee(s) comes within 50 feet of the operation. Activities will not resume until the manatee(s) has moved beyond the 50 -foot radius of the project operation, or until 30 minutes elapses if the manatee(s) has not reappeared within 50 feet of the operation. Animals must not be herded away or harassed into leaving. 5. Any collision with or injury to a manatee will be reported immediately to the FWC Hotline at 1-888-404-FWCC. Collision and/or injury should also be reported to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Jacksonville (1-904-731-3336) for north Florida or Vero Beach (1-772-562-3909) for south Florida. 6. Temporary signs concerning manatees will be posted prior to and during all in -water project activities. All signs are to be removed by the permittee upon completion of the project. Awareness signs that have already beeri -approved for this use by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) must be used (see MyFWC.com). One sign which reads Caution: Boaters must be posted. A second sign measuring at least 8 1/2" by 11" explaining the requirements for "Idle Speed/No Wake" and the shut down of in -water operations must be posted in a location prominently visible to all personnel . engaged in water -related activities. Submerged Aquatic Vegetation Conditions: 1. Avoidance. The piling -supported structure will be aligned so as to minimize the size of the footprint. over SAV beds. 2. The height of piling -supported structure will be a minimum of 5 feet above MHW/OHW as measured from the top surface of the decking. 3. The width of the piling -supported structure is limited to a maximum of 4 feet. A turnaround area is allowed for piling -supported structures greater than 200 feet in length. The turnaround is limited to a section of the piling -supported structure no more than 10 feet in length and no more than 6 feet in width. The turnaround will be located at the midpoint of the piling -supported structure. 4. Over -SAV bed portions of the piling -supported structure will be oriented in a north -south orientation to the maximur:},extent that is practicable. 5. Terminal Platforms: 1. If possible, terminal platforms will be placed in deep water, waterward of SAV beds or in an area devoid of SAV beds. over SAV areas and constructed of rated decking, the total size • 2. If a terminal platform is placed g g, of the platform will be limited to 160 square feet. The grated deck material will conform to the specifications stipulated below. The configuration of the platform will be a maximum of 8 feet • by 20 feet. A minimum of 5 feet by 20 feet will conform to the 5 -foot height requirement; a 3 feet by 20 feet section may be placed 3 feet above MHW to facilitate boat access. The long axis of the platform should be aligned in a north -south direction to the maximum extent that is practicable. 11 • 3. If the terminal platform is placed over SAV areas and constructed of planks, the total size of the platform will be limited to 120 square feet. The configuration of the platform will be a maximum of 6 feet by 20 feet of which a minimum 4 -foot wide by 20 -foot long section will conform to the 5 -foot height requirement. A section may be placed 3 feet above MHW to facilitate boat access. The 37feet above MHW section will be cantilevered. The long axis of the platform should be aligned in a north -south direction to the maximum extent that is practicable. If the 3 feet above MHW section is constructed with grating material, it may be 3 feet wide. 6. Pilings will be installed in a manner which will not result in the formation of sedimentary deposits ("donuts" or "halos") around the newly installed pilings. Pile driving is the preferred method of installation, but jetting with a low pressure pump may be used. 7. The spacing of pilings through SAV beds will be a minimum of 10 feet on center. 8. The gaps between deckboards will be a minimum of 1/2 inch. Marsh and Mangroves Conditions: Marsh: 1. The piling -supported structure will be aligned so as to have the smallest over -marsh footprint as practicable. 2. The over -mach portion of the piling -supported structure will be elevated to at least 4 feet above the marsh floor. 3. The width of the piling -supported structure is limited to a maximum of 4 feet. Any exceptions to the width must be accompanied by an equal increase in height requirement. Mangroves: 1. The width of the piling -supported structure is limited to a maximum of 4 feet. 2. Mangrove clearing is restricted to the width of the piling -supported structure. 3. The location and alignment of the piling -supported structure should be through the narrowest area of the mangrove fringe. Sea Turtle and Smalltooth Sawfish Construction Conditions The permittee will comply with the following protected species construction conditions: I - The permittee will instruct all personnel associated with the project of the potential presence of these species and the need to avoid collisions with sea turtles and smalltooth sawfish. All construction personnel are responsible for observing water -related activities for the presence of these species. 2. The permittee will advise all construction personnel that there are civil and criminal penalties for harming, harassing, or killing sea turtles or smalltooth sawfish, which are protected under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 3. Siltation barriers will be made of material in which a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish cannot become entangled, he properly secured, and be regularly monitored to avoid protected species entrapment. Barriers may not block sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish entry to or "it from designated critical habitat without prior agreement from the National Marine Fisheries Service's Protected Resources Division, St. Petersburg, Florida. 4. All vessels associated with the construction project will operate at "no wake/idle" speeds at all times while in the construction area and while in water depths where the draft of the vessel provides less than a four -foot clearance from the bottom. All vessels will preferentially follow deep -water routes (e.g., marked channels) whenever possible. 5. if a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish is seen within IGO yards of the active daily construction/dredging operation or vessel movement, all appropriate precautions will be implemented to ensure its protection. These precautions will include cessation of operation of any moving equipment closer than 50 feet of a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish. Operation of any mechanical construction equipment will cease immediately if a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish is seen within a 50 -ft radius of the equipment. Activities may not resume until the protected species has departed the project area of its own volition. 6. Any collision with and/or injury to a sea turtle or smalltooth sawfish will be reported immediately to the National Marine Fisheries Service's Protected Resources Division (727-824-5312) and the local authorized sea turtle stranding/rescue organization. 7. Any special construction conditions, required of your specific project, outside these general conditions, if applicable, will be addressed in the primary consultation. 8. Any collision(s) with and/or injuries to any whale, or sturgeon occurring during the construction of a project, shall be reported immediately to NMFS's Protected Resources Division (PRD) at (727-824-5312). 9. Reports to NMFS's Protected Resources Division (PRD) may be made by email to takereport,mnfsser@noaa.gov, 10. Sea turtle and marine mammal stranding/rescue organizations' contact information is available by region at http,,1`,www,nmt's ii(,)aa.gt)v-prbealth�'tietworks-hitil. 11. Smalltooth sawfish encounters shall be reported to 12. All work must occur during daylight hours. Sea Turtle and Smalltooth Sawfish Construction Conditions O1. For concrete piles installed by impact hammer: 1. The piles will be less than or equal to than 24 inches in diameter; and 2. Not more than 10 piles will be installed per day if in open water; or, 3. Not more than 5 piles will be installed per day in a confined space. A confined space is defined as any, area that has a solid object (e.g., shoreline, seawall, jetty) or structure within 150 feet of the pile installation site that would effectively serve as a barrier or otherwise prevent animals from moving past it to exit the area. This does not include objects such as docks or other pile -supported structures that would not stop animal movement or significantly reflect noise. 3. Metal piles will NOT be installed by impact hammer. 4. The Permittee is responsible for obtaining any "take" permits required under the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's regulations governing compliance with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act or the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The Permittee should contact the appropriate local office of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to determine if such "take" permits are required for a particular activity. 5. The Permittee is responsible for compliance with 50 CFR 224.103(c) prohibiting approach within 500 yards of a right whale, with limited exceptions. • 0 radius of the project operation, or until 30 minutes elapses if the manatee(s) has not reappeared within 50 feet of the operation. Animals must not be herded away or harassed into leaving. 5. Any collision with or injury to a manatee shall be reported immediately to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FWC) Hotline at 1-888-404-3922. Collision and/or injury should also be reported to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service in Jacksonville (1-904-731-3336) for north Florida or Vero Beach (1-772-562-3909) for south Florida, and to FWC at ImperiledSpecies@myFWC.com 6. Temporary signs concerning manatees shall be posted prior to and during all in -water project activities. All signs are to be removed by the permittee upon completion of the project. Temporary signs that have already been approved for this use by the FWC must be used. One sign which reads Caution: Boaters must be posted. A second sign measuring at least 8 iL%z" by 11" explaining the requirements for "Idle Speed/No Wake" and the shut down of in -water operations must be posted in a location prominently visible to all personnel engaged in water -related activities. These signs can be viewed at MyFWC.com/manatee. Questions concerning these signs can be sent to the email address listed above • BOUNDARY SURVEY • 0 • ' a t — !2 go ry� Wz ? 060 aao Lo Q�C W�YO �a Y+tRv m� w^ Kp 7V Z m iR f� ir 0 00 w a6 ° u a" ni 6 �� Rit I f ®.b i i" L x.11, a °11 wI° �s �3 $11 2g k, ill �o o�a 3�Y3'aY 5 I k,$ d i g rr F °�5.1111310.H e X.c w illi nor 44 O®i o�oAgo.e-3ig g �►� Rev LL TWO b \\\\ \ ILI Qa = o �\ \ `•\ \ n \\ \ INt' pol \ \ \ Y 4 ° Z Y ��• a N Wb� C r N W • • 0 • • i LL 0 N W CD Q a rq) �5 'SMl 1A6�/ 5.�p1 op95 N �ypp� �Pl N 0 J / w z Z 0 N w r- �� a o W J z Q w U ° �J • 0 • • PARTNERSHIP AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORITY I, Kevin King. President of Headwaters Development Inc. a Florida profit corporation. the General Partner of Headwaters Development Limited Liability Limited Partnership. L.LLP, a Florida limited partnership. of 2610 Golden Gate Park-*vay, Naples. FL 34105 t"Headwaters"). do hereby confirm that Greg Wardeberg is an authorized agent of Headwaters for purposes of executing and recording such notices of commencement and notices of termination as may be necessary or appropriate in connection with the construction of improvements on the real property more particularly described below: Lots 1 through 23, inclusive, of the Landings at Bears Paw, a subdivision. according to the Plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 56. Pages 5 and 6, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. (the -Property") The rights, powers and authority of Greg Wardeberg shall commence and be in full force and etfiect on the date hereof, and such rights, powers and authority shall terminate only upon my execution and recordation in the Collier County Public Records of a termination of such authority. iN WITNESS WHEREOF. I have hereunto set my- hand this _1st day ofOctoher. 2015. Witnessed by: Pnat uen�r:�� Prim Name:: L.--- Province of Newfoundland ) Country of Canada 1 The foregoing instrument \vas acknowledged before me this ,1 il day of October, 2015, by Kevin King. a•ho is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. I am a commissioned notary public of the Province of Newfoundland. Canada. and m% commission expires on N/A . NOT:NRY PUBLIC. Kcr th J. Young t�FFlX SF.\41 My commission expires: N/A ';10916-CM/2359595/11 r 0 THE LANDINGS — at BEAR'S PAW — January 17, 2017 Collier County Government Re: The Landings at Bears Paw – Lot 22 - Coe Residence - Boat Dock Extension Request To Whom it may concern; This letter is intended to notify Collier County that the Developers of the Landings at Bears Paw have reviewed and approve of the above referenced boat dock extension request (attached herewith). We trust that our approval will allow the County to proceed with your review of the proposed boat dock extension permit • application. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 239-825-7279. Sincerely. Gr War erg Autgent Headwaters etopment, LP Mailing Address: P.O. Box 110062, Naples, Florida 34108-0062 • Civic Address: 2640 Golden Gate Parkway, Suite 116, Naples, Florida 34105-3220 Phone: 239.293.5899 0 1 U. LL 0 W Q r� v/ t . v LOCATM OGMia 4 U 8 ei i W W k $ QCO via 1 to w w 'r a? LC z r a0 F ou z� z ILo j LOCATM OGMia 4 U 8 J z W W O $ QCO via to w w a? LC z a0 ou z� z ILo IL z N 0 LL LL m F O to wW Q z r v (Q F zg N a6 z$ J zLL o (�l Z N z LLj oxzJ IM dw � Q on QW (D �Wk'•M- � yv Q zc J r� o LZ O om s z s��Wo --� € � i All I r. x 4 �� x. x r q ryT is aD . O P x Q x x # . .. x� x N N XalD Z s 0 a= Q r < z w CL0 O q�LL pew a CL (9xa om s z s��Wo --� € � i All I r. x 4 �� x. x r q ryT is aD . O P x Q x x # . .. x� x N N �J r q�LL pew (9xa Ze 4 oma Li Q+ m5 X x co X X WOO 4 dQ k x x x Y X •. x a 4 „ x w Z x x x — r,; w OL O sx, 4 H X x a n 1�605Ime tlndlCaOVTflN ATE10lt 4 COE 6TATEOm FJ(ibTNG 10MdT416 n' N 0 "I X m ► X Y. 4 x X x X x co X 4 FK w k x x x Y X •. x a 4 „ x x x x — r,; x sx, 4 H X x x x X w z J z d Q � � y lox CL ¢ LL O a. ` a n 1�605Ime tlndlCaOVTflN ATE10lt 4 COE 6TATEOm FJ(ibTNG 10MdT416 n' N 0 "I w z IL z 4( < X 0LL O N' yM�o 9 rJ`... Y V` X x X p LL X. W r cm�.0 r.- ~ CL� � � X a= x .� X N N' yM�o 9 a z y z. a P W \ ' w r e Qx a \ x a t �t n x r Y W E CL LL a x x FNM a z y z. a P W \ ' w r e Qx a \ x a t �t n x N ry O � z a 0 a �r Y m �N o a b 10 - EJ W z O CC d. Z© 5-< �O �= w S's �- 1� LU U) p a Z a v v w 3 00� �mm a d <LL.F a a IL 0 w z 0- -- if 9 _J N a. wFr os Zp , ��wrrr W CAW1L tOb7076 • J Q Z Z 13z cn Y 12a� & W yy�0 Ci�`1P W r\ .59 ' U- Z U- O© ca J9 A3 wC'3C� T Z Ln Detail by Entity Name J". Department of State Division of Corporations Search Records Detail By Document Number Detail by Entity Name Florida Profit Corporation HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT INC. Filing Information Document Number P12000002682 FE11EIN Number 45-4215845 Date Filed 01/09/2012 Effective Date 01/05/2012 State FL Status ACTIVE Last Event REINSTATEMENT Event Date Filed 11/11/2013 Principal Address 2640 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY SUITE 116 NAPLES, FL 34105 Changed: 11/11/2013 Mailing Address P.O. BOX 110062 NAPLES, FL 34108 Changed: 11/11/2013 Registered Agent Name & Address Novaft,Jeff, Esq. 1415 Panther Lane Suite 327 Naples, FL 34109 Name Changed: 04/08/2015 Address Changed: 04108/2015 Officer/Director Detail • Name & Address Title DPS KING, KEVIN http://search.sunbiz.orgAnqU ry/CorporaticnSearcWSearchResultDeWl?i nq0ry1ype= Ent tyN ame&drec5onType= ForwardUsMsearchNameorder= H EADWAT... 1/2 17 P.O. BOX 110062 NAPLES, FL 34108 Title DTVP HATCHER, PAUL :. P.O. BOX 110062 NAPLES, FL 34108 Title VP Pitts, Kimberly P.O. BOX 110062 NAPLES, FL 34108 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2015 02/03/2015 2016 02/26/2016 2016 09/23/2016 Detail by Entity Name Document Images 09/23/2016 —AMENDED ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/2612016 —ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 04/08/2015 —AMENDED 4VNUAL REPORT View image in PDF fonnat 02/03/2015 —ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03/16/2014 — ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 030212012—Amendment and Name Change View image in PDF format 01/09/2012 — Domestic Profit View image in PDF format • is httpJ/search.surlbiz.org ngLiry/CorporaGonSearcW-qewchResultDetail7inquirytype=EnlityName&directionType=Forward).ist&searchNameOrder=HEADWAT... 212 1/18/2017 • C] Detail by Entity Name v'4y I Qepadment of Statim / Division of Corporations ! Search Records / pelail By Document Nurnber I Detail by Entity Name Florida Limited Partnership HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT LIMITED PARTNERSHIP Filing Information Document Number A12000000132 FEVEIN Number N/A Date Filed 03/13/2012 State FL Status ACTIVE Last Event LP CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION/NAME CHG Event Date Filed 03/08/2016 Event Effective Date NONE Principal Address 2640 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY SUITE 116 NAPLES, FL 34105 UN Changed: 11/12/2013 Mailing Address P.O. BOX 110062 NAPLES, FL 34108 Changed: 11/12/2013 Registered Agent Name & Address Novatt, Jeff, Esq. 1415 Panther Lane Suite 327 Naples, FL 34109 Name Changed: 02/26/2016 Address Changed: 02/26/2016 General Partner Detail Name & Address Document Number P12000002682 httpJ/search.sunbiz.org/inquiry/CorporationSearch/SearchResultDetail7inqurytype=EntityName&cirectionType=ForwardList&searchNameOrder=H EADWAT... 1/2 1/1&2017 HEADWATERS DEVELOPMENT INC. 2640 GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY NAPLES, FL 34105 Annual Reports Report Year Filed Date 2014 03/18/2014 2015 02/03/2015 2016 02/26/2016 Detail by Entity Name Document Images 03/06/2016 — LP Statement of CordNC View image in PDF format 02/26/2016—, ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 02/03/2015 — ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 03118/2014 —ANNUAL REPORT View image in PDF format 11/12/2013 — REINSTATEMENT View image in PDF format 03/13/2012 — Domestic LP View image in PDF format i• • htfpJ/searchsur biz.org/Ingtury/CorporationSearcWSearchResultDetail7tngtrirytype=ErittyName&directonType=ForwardUst&searchNameOrder=HEADWAT... 2/2 AGENDA ITEM 4-C Co eir County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE: APRIL 13, 2017 SUBJECT: PETITION VA-PL20160002424, 412 MARATHON COURT VARIANCE PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Property Owner: Agent: Monica Calvert Hawn Revocable Living Trust Ms. Tatiana Gust 412 Marathon Court Elite Consulting of SWFL LLC Naples, FL 34112 2670 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 REQUESTED ACTION: To have the Collier County Hearing Examiner consider an application for a variance from Section 4.02.01 A., Table 2.1 of the Land Development Code to reduce the minimum rear yard setback line from 25 feet to 18.9 feet for a single family house with a lanai that will be enclosed. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at Lot 4, Block H, Lakewood Unit 1 subdivision, also described as 412 Marathon Court, approximately '/2 mile north of Tamiami Trail East and just east of Lakewood Boulevard, in Section 13, Township 50 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See location map on following page) PURPOSEIDESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: This residence is zoned RSF-3 and it encroaches into the minimum rear yard principal structure setback. The RSF-3 rear yard setback is 25 feet; this residence encroaches 6.1 feet. The impetus for this variance is the applicant's request to enclose an existing lanai (currently unscreened) into habitable space on the southeast portion of the home. The encroachment includes a portion of the residence which was previously converted into habitable space and a lanai which the VA-PL20160002424, 412 Marathon Court Variance March 16, 2017 Page 1 of 8 v O 7 � 0V r J 8 Q cu 2 c 4-a cu U J N N a 0 N i J a. L: E Z C a.+ a. OF BOUNDARY SURVEY NOT FIN FEAL'E CDWTRVCT70N Nor r0R caASTRuc7laN NOT FIR DESIGN PROVIDED BY CLIENT STREET ADDRESS 412 MARATHON COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA MARATHON COURT 4r60' R76FIT OF WAY) A+ EDGE Dr c4. 04'.A/ PR TOTAL AREA aF THE TWO PORTMVS Or THE MSTI46 STRUCTURE KY" THE PROVIDED 25' REAR SETBACK LAE IS 52 SO rT:, MORE OR LESS TOTAL AREA OF COVERED PARG71 BEYOW THE' PROVJDED 23' REAR SETBACK LIRE IS 20 SR ',M MORE DR LESS PORTION or STRLCTLFIES BEYIND THE PROVIDED 25' REAR SETBACK LJAE THE HIGIEST PART Oi TIE WOOD DEC! JS 16' AX''.VC TIE ADJACENT GROLND Curve number I RadAm- 50.60 Delta= 49'2246' Arc= 43.09---- c=u S CERTIFIED TO : Date: 2017.01.25 MICHAEL HAVN A'!D, 40NICA C. HAIV.AO:25 -05'00' LEGAL DESCRIPTION : LOT 4, BLOCK H OF LAKEVOOD UNIT NO 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 12, PAGE 8, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, THE LIAES ON THIS SKETCH m NOT CONSTITUTE OWNERSHIP, NOTE, THE 7NTENT OF THIS SURVEY IS FOR TITLE TRANSFER ONLY CO'rRlOIT VI6, rL.A. S4NVEYS CDRP. PAGE 1 OF 3 SEE REVERSE SIDE FAR PAGE 3 IF 3 W w 0 LOT 5 BLOCK H I a SIR IA IQ CK QUALITY CONTROL BY : MEF ^, DATE ; _ 7/2516016 I CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 5J-17.05, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. S02.23'43'E. 136.46' (M) IVEY TIE LAE Y J to i ly FIR 5/8' 1 AO ID 6' DRAIN4CE RIGHT OF WAY MEASURED BEARINGS SHOVN ARE BASED ON STATE PLANE COORDINATES (FLORIDA EAST ZOW.) AS ACQUIRED BY USING GPS TECHNOLOGY AND IS THE 'BASIS OF BEARINGS'. CERTIFICATION : 'GRAPHIC SCALE I CERTIFY �T THIS .Y WADE UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE NOTE- IN CDHPUANCE WITH F.A.C. BY : SURVEY DATE : _ 7/22/?016 5t17.052 (2> (cD (A> (IF LOCATION IF EASEMENTS OR R16HT-13F-WAY OF RECORD, CLINTON W. FOIST E, CM PIS #2453 LELAND F. DyBARD, PIS /3859 OTHER THAN THOSE 13N RECORD PLAT, IS VARY E. FDiSTAD, CFII. P311 /6901 RE9UIRED, THIS INFORMATION MUST BE FURMSHED TO THE SURVEYOR AND MAPPER, NOT VAUD VATHDJT SURVEYOR'S SIGNATURE AND EMBOSSED SEAL NOT A CERTIFICA%I N OF TITLE, ZONING. EASEMENTS OR FREEDOM OF ENCUMBRANCES. NOTE, IF APPLICABLE, rLAVES SHOWN MEANDER FLORIDA STATUTE 5J-17.05 (3) (c): TWO SITE BENCHMARKS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION ON OP arr LINES. (APPROX. LOCATION ONLY) NOTE, PROPERTY OWNER SHOULD OBTAIN WRITTEN FLOOD Zaw DETERMINATION rRON LOCAL PERMITTING, PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION 3884 PROGRESS AVE., SUITE 104 REVISIONS NAPLES, FL 34104 F.L.A. SURVEYS CORP. 239-403-1600 FAX 403-8600 AREAS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS & MAPPERS -LB 6569 239-404-7129 239-580-2795 12-02-2015 239-250-2792 239-825-8504 PROJECT N0: 9220 BONITA BEACH ROAD, STE 200 DRAWN BY: JCP I PARTY CHIEF: VL BONITA SPRINGS, Ft 34135 16 -85733 -SPC SURVEY SKETCH OF BOUNDARY SURVEY PAGE 2 OF 3 NOT FOR FENCE CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR DESIGN PHOTO PAGE r ':- -, ,fti---',,,,,A,,t1/4, .t„'1'.-.,411-r,, - • ItAt ,, , • ',,," ,,i , , ,'' ik* lL --'4 ..�w� � ^ k.'.'�k. b � � ' .y fi� t % it , `tg _., E .c. , b ._ ., a ,, itiAtlie } °^S i Ase i _r .„1, C a �• r if,1 i ! 1 W ,r ate- .. - '^n: -"��• ,� �� 3884 PROGRESS AVE.,SUITE 104 F.L.A.SURVEYS CORP. NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS&MAPPERS-LB 6569 239-403-1600 FAX 403-6600 9220 BONITA BEACH ROAD,STE.20 BONTTA SPRINGS,FLORIDA 34135 5 PROJECT NO. DRAWN BY:LFD IPARTY CHIEF: IN/A 239-403-1600 FAX 403-8600 16-85733 applicant wishes to convert to habitable space. According to the Property Card, the subject residence was developed in 1973 under building permit 73-362. Staff has searched for this permit and the Records Room has no record. This property was zoned SF -4 when built and, per the August 1973 Land Development Code, the required setbacks were 20 feet for the rear yard and a reduced 15 feet for a pool or patio (see Attachment A). The subsequent additions to the residence under permit 85-3743 (purpose of construction: enclose porch) and permit 87-541 (purpose of construction: CBS patio addition) would have bee n required to follow setbacks under Ordinance 82-2. This property was zoned RSF-4, under Ordinance 82-2, with a required rear yard principal structure setback of 25 feet and a required screen enclosure rear yard setback of 10 feet (see Attachment B). Both permits, 85- 3743 and 87-541, do not list the utilized setbacks for construction. In the course of this variance process, the applicant became aware that Permit 87-541 was never closed. As of 10/05/16, Permit 87-541 is "considered closed/resolved based upon property research and inspections of permitted items, along with an architect's certification that the lanai met code at time of permitting", per Jonathon Walsh (see Attachment Q. The purpose of the subject Variance is to allow for the existing single-family residence to encroach into the 25 -foot rear yard setback by 6.1 feet; thus, creating an 18.9 -foot rear yard setback. VA-PL20160002424, 412 Marathon Court Variance March 16, 2017 Page 4 of 8 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCEL: A single-family residence, with a zoning designation of RSF-3 North: Single-family residence, with a zoning designation of RSF-3 East: Multi -family residences, with a zoning designation of RMF -6 South: Single-family residence, with a zoning designation of RSF-3 West: Single-family residence, with a zoning designation of RSF-3 AERIAL GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CONSISTENCY: The subject property is located in the Urban Mixed Use Residential land use classification on the County's Future Land Use Map (FLUM). This land use category is designed to accommodate a variety of residential uses including single-family, multi -family, duplex, mobile home and mixed-use projects. As previously noted, the subject petition seeks a variance for a single-family home that is located within a single-family subdivision, which is an authorized use in this land use designation, therefore, the single-family home use is consistent with the FLUM. The Growth Management Plan does not address individual variance requests; the Plan deals with the larger issue of the actual use. VA-PL20160002424, 412 Marathon Court Variance March 16, 2017 Page 5 of 8 ANALYSIS: The decision to grant a variance is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.04.03. Staff has analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? Yes. Per the Collier County Appraiser, the general rear footprint configuration of this home can be clearly seen from 1985; the roofline from 1995 onward appears to be in today's current configuration (see Attachment D). The footprint of the home existed prior to the current homeowner's ownership. The rear property line of this home abuts a lake which ameliorates the rear yard encroachment. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? Yes. Property Records and Building permits indicate that the Applicant has owned the subject property since 2005. The single-family residential additions into the 25 -foot rear yard setback occurred prior to the current owner's purchase in 2005; per the Collier County Appraiser website, this residence's rear yard roofline has been in existence, in a continuous configuration, since 1985. C. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? Yes. The current footprint of the single-family residence has been in existence prior to the current homeowners' ownership. The point of maximum encroachment is, per the applicant, an "existing living space"; the applicant also wishes to enclose a lanai into habitable space which would also encroach but not greater than current encroachment of the residence. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety and welfare? Yes. The variance, if granted, will make possible the reasonable use of the land and will promote good standards of health, safety and welfare. e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? VA-PL20160002424, 412 Marathon Court Variance March 16, 2017 Page 6 of 8 No. This is the only home with this unique set of circumstances. As previously stated, the existing foot print of the single-family residence has been in existence for over 30 years and prior to the acquisition of the residence by its current owners. f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Yes. The granting of the Variance will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of the Land Development Code and will not harm public safety, health and welfare. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? Yes. The subject site is at the end of a cul-de-sac and is located along a designated lake. The shape of the lot is wider towards the rear of the lot where the intrusion of the residence occurs. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Approval of this Variance will not affect or change the requirements of the Growth Management Plan. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The Office of the County Attorney reviewed this Staff Report on 3/17/17. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve the following for Petition VA -PL -20160002424, 412 Marathon Court Variance: A reduced rear yard principal structure setback line from 25 feet to 18.9. Attachments: Attachment A: Portion of 1973 Code Attachment B: Portion of 1982 Code Attachment C: Building Review and Architect Comments Attachment D: Aerial Residence Timeline Attachment E: Neighbor's Letters of No Objection Attachment F: Application VA-PL20160002424, 412 Marathon Court Variance March 16, 2017 Page 7 of 8 PREPARED BY: ! 9� RACHEL BEASLEY, ANNER ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: 4elA - RAYMON V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER ZONING IVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION MICHAEL BOSI, AICP. DIRECTOR ZONING DIVISION VA-PL20160002424, 412 Marathon Court Variance March 16, 2017 Page 8 of 8 DATE '5 -Ta -17 DATE -.�- ;z ► - I7 DATE ZONING REGULATIONS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AL47 A006 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Honorable Clifford Wenzel, Chairman Honorable Thomas P. Archer, Vice -Chairman Honorable Stephen G. Mitchell Honorable David C. Brown Honorable Ruth VanDoren W. Harmon Turner, County Manager COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING & ZONING DEPARTMENT AUGUST , 1973 Attachment A Rev. March : 1970 C'_ (1) Non - commercial boat launching facilities, and multiple docking areas. (2) Recreational clubs, intended to serve the surrounding residential area. (3) Churches and other places of worship. (4) Schools and Colleges. 3. MAXIMUM LOT COVERAGE: 30% f 4. MINIMUM L07 AREA: 8,500 square feet. t i} 5. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: f rir A. Corner Lots - b. feet average between front and rear lot lines. 3 } E B. Interior Lots - 75 feet average between front and rear lot lines. ' b. MIN IMLJM YARDS: �.. A. Front Yard - 25 feet. i B. Side Yard - One story, 7 - feet; two story, 10 feet.fl it F; '1 C > Rear Yard - 20 feet. A residers to (1 or _.. poo patio, which is screen enclosed, or open on one or more sides for use in residential units, and which is incidental to that of the main building, rear yard setback may be reduced to 15 feet. This requirement shall not apply to boat houses. 3; D. On lots which front on more than one street, the front and which has the '=1§ street frontage may be reduced to 20 feet; the and opposite s the longest Y pposite the front yard with t the least street frontage shall be considered a rear yard for setback purposes. } 7. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA OF PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE: Is�' A. One story 1,000 square feet. B . Two story - 1, 200 square feet. g• MAXIMUa, HEIGHT: 30 feet aboverade. Boat ho limited to 20 feet. 6 uses and other accessary buildings i f 4• MINIMUM OFF - STREET PARKING: One space permitted buildin area. per residence, located within the ection 11.6 - SF - 5 Single Family Residentoil District. $$SpSp -41- t a. District Bxraose: M-tese districts are uTto n— to apply to areas of single-family resides which conform to the Collier County Bui.lduig Code and low dwelling unit inten- sity. Variation among the >` 2 x HW -3 r � .. end RSF-5 districts is in require nii of` lot area, lot width and minim yards. Certain structures and uses designed to serve gcwrnmental, educational., religious, non- coavercial recreational, and other immediate needs of such areas are permitted or are permissible as special exceptions within such districts, subject to restrictions and requirements necessary to pry and protect their single-family residential character. It is the intent of these districts to implement the C rrd*X sive Plan within, but not necessarily limited to those areas of Collier County shoran as low, low to medium and medium residential densities on the Land Use Plan. b. Uses and 2ta=M=: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered, or used, or land or water used, in Whole or in part, for other than the following: 1) Permitted J�rincipal Uses and Structures• (a) Single-family dwellings. (b) Public parks, public playgrounds, public play - fields, and caAmonly owned open spade. (Subject to Section 8.11) Rev. 1.10 (c) Family Care Facilities (subject to Section 8.53). 2) Permitted- Accessory Uses and Structt�es (a) Private boat houses and docks. (Subject to Section 8.46) (b) Customary accessory uses and structures, in- cluding private garages. (c) C7ne (1) guest house (Subject to Section 8.38). 3) Pe fitted P,toyisional Uses and StI es: (a) Nonrciai boat launching facilities, and multiple docking areas. (b) Recreational facilities not accessory to prin- cipal use. Rev.110 Ord.91-34 33. Attachment 8 (c) churches. (d) Public, private, parochial schools. (e) Charm occupied child care centers. (Subject to Section 8.48) Rev. 110 (f) Group Care Facilities (Category I) (subject to Section 8.53). (g) Group housing, patio housing and cluster housing. 4) Prohibited Uses and Structures: Any use or structure not specifically, provisionally or by reasonable implication permitted herein. C. Development Standards: 1) minim= Lott Area: RSF-1 43,560 sq. ft. RSF-2 20,000 sq. ft. RSF-3 10,000 sq. ft. RSF-4 7,500 sq. ft. RSF-5 6,000 sq. ft. 2) Minimum Lot Width: RSF-1 150 ft. RSF-2 120 ft. RSF-3 Corner Lots - 95 ft. Interior Lots - 80 ft. RSF-4 Corner lots - 75 ft. Interior lots - 70 ft. RSF-5 Corner Lots - 70 ft. Interior Lots - 60 ft. 3) MiniaaM Yard Requirements: RSF-1 RSF_2 RSF-3 RSF-4 RSF-5 (a) Front Yard: 50 ft. 40 ft. 30 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. (b) Side Yard: 30 ft. 20 ft. 7k ft. 7� ft. 7'k ft. (c) Rear Yard: 50 ft. 30 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. 20 ft. (d) Accessory Structure Yard: See Section 8.2. 4) Maxim= Height: For all RSF - Residential Single - Family Districts. Rev.110 Ord.91-34 34. SB=CN 8. SUPPLEMENTARY DISTRICT REGULATIONS: *REV -70 8.1 Visibility at Inters_-ections in All Zoning Districts: On a corner lot in all zoning districts, no fence, wall, hedge, planting, or structure shall be erected, planted, or allowed to grow in such a manner as to obstruct vision between a height of three (3) feet arra eight (8) feet above the centerline grades of the intersecting streets in the area bounded by the street right -of -ray lines of such corny lots and a line joining points along said street riot -of -way lines forty (40) feet from the point of intersec,•ticn. Parking is prohibited in this area. Trees are permitted, so long as the foliage is cut away and maintained within the three (3) and eight (8) foot clearance Posts for illuminating fixtures, traffic control, and street name signs are permitted, so long as the signor equipnent is not within the prescribed clear space. 8.2 Lccaticn of Accessary Structures: Accessory structures must be constructed simultaneously with or follawing the construction of the principal structure and shall ecnform with the following setbacks and building separations: AQCESSORY SndX-TMtES Non -Waterfront Lots - Non -Golf Course Lots SIATC• ME REAR SIDE TO STRLIL*lik2E (If detached) 1. Parking Garage or Carport - Single.Family 2. 1 -Story Parking Steres 3. Multi-Stcry Parking Structures 4. Swirmning Pool and/or Screen Enclosure (Che and tato family) 5. 9wiming Pool (Multiple family and C coviercial) 6. Tennis Courts (Private) (One and two family) *REV -70 Ord. 89-59 _ 113. SPS 101, SPS 10, SPS 35' SPS SPS 35' SPS V *4! SPS 201 15' SPS 15' SPS IN N 9/ f,, U!! @IY .bit `I LI t Ii iF _.` o C ¢ M. u ;:-, . V 1 �. {�i A 1 'tea !G , ` ,' _ i 4.,',A -1-... ... li*4 ;41•A;It'''. .; Pi { ypg .moi l V. E IR `uq,o�q g W of a tij i ' d .18 ' 4 cfJ as -'1,1-;1' I i a �5 $ to i H a F. •s: c� 8 140 d P y0,4 . a U `, US o t 1 ro € a I YACs d'; - " ,..'e ..‹ , i n3Ai g I2) '. g e ,; 1 ti I i,, ----t,',21` 0 C .r 01 0 6. y 4+ IA ';: 4 0 5 cn .+ Fri z ?; ; t Iit 44 vtom' `' u o ,a` d. C4 p O so in:4,1. Q ': Search Attachment C ,. l i `11111111111l111JARCHITECTURE ENGINEERING 144 DESIGN August 15, 2016 Collier County Growth Management Division Permitting Permit #87-541 412 Marathon Ct Naples, FL 34112 To whom it may concern: In the course of planning new projects, my client has become aware that there is an open permit for the property named above; the permit remains open for reasons unknown. This project, which was permitted in 1987, was designed to comply with the 1987 Standard Building Code. The requirements of this code were very basic as they relate to structural.design and wind resistance. But, after surveying the existing work it appears to be very structurally sound related to structural design. It appears that this structure and the roof is structurally sound and has no signs of distress. All posts and other framing members appear to be pressure treated and are properly secured to the surrounding structure, at least at a minimum in keeping with the requirements of the building code at that time. It is my understanding that the homeowners intend to upgrade the structure and enclose it per the current codes. I recommend closing this permit to allow for the future work to progress. Sincerely, Laura Caffey, Architect AR92780 Naples Architarture Engineering & Design LLC Certificate of Authority #31622 700119, St S Suite PH2 Naples, Florida 34102 ph (239) 280--0543 fax (239) 280-0432 NaplesAE.com Page 1 of 1 Attachment D http://maps.collierappraiser.comlwebmaploutput2/Collier 1985_sdeO3l299241122994 jpg 2/27/2017 Page 1 of 1 http://maps.collierappraiser.comlwebmaploutput2lCollier_1995_sdeO3l299255723128.jpg 2/27/2017 Page i of I 2 0 03 http://maps.collierappraiser.comlwebmaploutput2/Collier 2003_sdeO3l299255723184 jpg 2/27/2017 Page 1 of 1 2Le) 0-:�- http://maps.collierappraiser.comlwebmaploutput2/Collier 2007_sdeO3l684827883158 jpg 2/27/2017 Page 1 of 1 http://maps.collierappraiser.comlwebmaploutput2/Collier 2017_sdeO3514811748340O jpg 2/27/2017 2-24-2017 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN. I live at -i/ 7 Marathon Ct Naples 34112. 1 understand that 412 Marathon Ct. owner wants to enclose their covered lanai area which encroach's seven feet in to the 25 foot setback. I have no problem with have owner enclosing the lanai. Signed. Q )&C^" Attachment E 2-24-2017 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, I live at jd Marathon Ct Naples 34112. 1 understand that 412 Marathon Ct. owner wants to enclose their covered lanai area which encroach's seven feet in to the 25 foot setback. I have no problem with have owner enclosing the lanai. .s` Signed, 2-24-2017 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, I live atAb4- Marathon Ct Naples 34112. 1 understand that 412 Marathon Ct. owner wants to enclose their covered lanai area which encroach's seven feet in to the 25 foot setback. I have no problem with have owner enclosing the lanai. Signed, 2-24-2017 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN, I live atJ2 Marathon Ct Naples 34112. 1 understand that 412 Marathon Ct. owner wants to enclose their covered lanai area which encroach's seven feet in to the 25 foot setback. I have no problem with have owner enclosing the lanai. Signed �� U 7�- V �� er C...nty • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 wwwralfiergowne (239)252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: ICrt.� Date and Time: 2h J-35 Assigned Planner: _ Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information f 1� Project Name:yx r� PL Property ID #:� 1 tL�!•rt.}1VJ Current Zonin4 r� Project Add" -ss, _ _ (� l �� City: State Zip: '-1� Applicant: l Agent Name: P one: 0,T) 6370, Agent/Firm Address: C ,State: 2-1 Zip: ' La Property Owner:tWluf�-VWo Please provide the following, if applicable: I. Total Acreage: t (Z' Ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: —�ZL iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. F endments, indicate the original petition number: V. if there is an ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: 14 vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Atttachment F COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT ENT DEPARTMENT www.colliergov.net Meeting Notes M4,14 W7 - Go�oAvrs M E.u0e-o6d5- .4 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 • /i4770 ,45 L/ v/ A)6 spare /Ot4;1i0G sA1We 4S Xis 7-14)a t om. Co�Clounty • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www,colliergov.net (239) 352-2400 Pre -Applied n ti g I -In heat PL #• / Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Chris Alcorn Utility Billing 821-8136 chrisalcorn@colliergov.net ❑ David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 1 davidanthony@colliergov.net ❑ Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 1 summerbrownaraque@colliergov.net Co er Couxty ❑ Steve Baluch, P.E. Transportation Planning 252-2361 StephenBaluch@coiliergov.net I ❑ MurIP Beard Transportation Pathways 252-5782 Lauriebeard@colliergov.net I ❑ Rachel Beasley Zoning Services 252-8202 rachelbeasley@colliergov.net ❑ Marcus Berman County Surveyor 252-6885 MarcusBerman@colliergov.net f I ❑ Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5165 markburtchin@colliergov.net ❑ George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543 georgecascio@colliergov.net ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heldiashton@colliergov.net ❑ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 suefaulkner@colliergov.net ❑ Dale Fey North Naples Fire 597-3222 dalefey@colliergov.net ❑ Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman@colliergov.net ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundlach@colliergov.net ❑ Shar Hingson East Naples Fire District 687-5650 shingson@ccfco.org ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Services 252-5757 johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net ❑ Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodihughes@colliergov.net ❑ Alicia Humphries Site Plans Reviewer/ROW 252-2326 aliciahumphries@colliergov.net ❑ Eric Johnson, AICP,CFM Zoning Services 252-2931 ericjohnson@colliergov.net ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall@colliergov.net ❑ Stephen Lenbt.-&er Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger@colliergov.net ❑ Garrett Louviere Stormwater 252-2526 garrettiouviere@colliergov.net ❑ Paulo Martins Utilities • 252-428S ` paulomartins@colliergov.net ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Fire Safety 252-7348 Thomasmastroberto@colliergov.net ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. I Engineering Services 252-2911 jackmckenna@colliergov.net ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmclean@colliergov.net ❑ Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility Impact Fees 252-4215 gilbertmoncivaiz@colliergov.net ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam@colliergov.net ❑ Stefanie Nawrocki Planning and Zoning 252-2313 StefanieNawrocki@colliergov.net ❑ Jessica Huckeba _ j CAD Technician 252-2315 JessicaHuckeba@colliergov.net ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandyotero@colliergov.net • 0., 0 Cor County . COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES. FLORIDA 34104 www.rniliprvnv np+ (7ZQi 7q7 -'JAM 0 0 Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name North Naples Fire 597-3222 billpancake@colliergov.net ❑ Bill Pancake ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipollard@colliergov.net Fred Reischi, AICP Zoning Services 252-4211 fredreischl@colliergov.net ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Utility Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenblum@colliergov.net ❑ Edwin Sanchez Fire Review i if 252-7517 edwinsanchez@coiliergov.net ❑ Michael Sawyer _ Transportation Planning ! 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net ❑ Chris Scott, AICP Planning and Zoning j 252-2460 chrisscott@coliiergov.net l ❑ Peter Shawinsky Architectural Review 252-8523 PeterShawinsky@colliergov.net ❑ Daniel Smith, AICP Zoning Services 252-4312 danieismith@coliiergov.net ❑ Ellen Summers Planning and Zoning 252-1032 EllenSummers@coiliergov.net Scott Stone — Assistant County Attorney 252-8400 scottstone@colliergov.net ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@coiliergov.net ❑ Chad Sweet Transportation 252-5687 chadsweet@collierogv.net ❑ Mark Templeton Landscape 252-2475 marktempieton@colliergov.net ❑ Jon Walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwalsh@colliergov.net ❑ David Weeks, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwiikie@colliergov.net i ❑ Christine Willoughby Planning and Zoning 252-5748 ChristineWilloughby@coliiergov.net I Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email I � i COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT 34104 www.collier ov.net 6358 Caunty 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252 - Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for. Variance Chapter 31. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist into be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below With coversbeets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW fNOT ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 0 7/4/2014 Page 5 of 7 # O C REQUIRED REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) Pre -Application Meeting Notes 1 Project Narrative bo Completol ed Addrpssi�.?i C_hecklisi 1 Conceptual Site Plan 24" x 36' and one 8 X ' x 11" copy Survey of property showing the encroachment (measured in feet) 2 Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 2 Deeds/Legal's 3 Location map 1 Et Current aerial p;eotographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial 5 E Historical Survey or waiver request 1 Environmental Data Requirements or exemption justification 3 Once the first set of review comments are posted, provide the assigned planner the Property Owner Advisory Letter and Certification 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 'h 2, ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 0 7/4/2014 Page 5 of 7 I* • • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT 34104 www.colliergov.net 6358 �4 Co er County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252 - Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to he rnutect to the fnllnuAna rouin.0 _ ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: xecutive Director ❑ Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet Addressing: Annis Moxam Graphics: Mariam Ocheltree City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Historical Review ompre,,Fnsive Planning: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -in Sheet (] Immokalee Water/Sewer District: onservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Transportation Pathways: Stacey Revay ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or S: Artie Bay ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock Engineering: Alison Bradford _ Transportation Planning: John Podczerwinsky Other: Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen FEE REQUIREMENTS Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 Variance Petitio residentjall- $2,000.00 o Non -Residential- 5n, and Subsequent Review - $5,000.00 20% of original fee o Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner:ySg25 90 �frz After The Fact Zoning/Land Use Petitions: 2x the normal petition fee Listed Species Survey (if EIS is not required): $1,000.00 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation 7/4/2014 Page 6 of 7 co Y O In 0 10 60- z Z {� U ~ N o 00 M U. $Paan N Q Z Z� a W a Q @=7�i0vvW O_ VJ J ® � U a« N a a aW 0CJ ON Z N cC NF - a0 'I -, Wyyp NIN _ 3Iu 3� a51a IQ `F 1 �E 00 rVl��'slllry srals'Ixl q -Y, a'v incl•XA I) uw t @I iY,.�T r •1VI. ygra Illry 'Yr!fllr wrYPl! MFri arryl +pxllii]lDr. / T AL a,q • wa�rla•,w Pw N "I ��w�y° +y] q w • ab.e w, ra .0 , ,ar w al ,. , , 15+ IWt ., aw a, ,I aw lu ..�zs lZ :ax«.]n—^�'�— w1e u1 . .w GG I x�l� .�a.-. ,•Yt '-ZGrj• tr le Y!W �.°�!y +) .Mae1-SaV M •!wt:' •G FnMq , I rr rlgwt] ,I ,.�gxw M ewywaalww . I rrv, .�•dn�,'IIKx ' �ro ie KCv'q., 1. allray rlw Nr oll -n � ] .elrl , . ,awx I ) ,Frry ,u r aq w wr aFr arty e, r •• ���� x�yy '+vxda.N^r:tl SfiVY] ltlTx) Ktl xr ^ •"1`I Sa �:" ar �i I 'a�rq >wq. la•M q„ m ,w,> an111 ] M . NN�ia. MI1',N 'Kxl '•.r-- IY N:�7— ,1w . n.ltlui t,wo] aarllW M y r«�,.ea rrr al Yl . ..x44 l�l w +w] .nll IW •yx k�-• CN I • y( •Iw 'nlnl! l• nnl ' �.�,p 4r,Kry`4'' c Siyi6G._.. r tol p y •.f I.wlm 1'Y7iFi rqw. W vw wl...aa..n. x;.c,'-- N ; w, x n�•':tl, earaa.N wr.N Wt et al >aq n " rYM,rr1S•Ja!'r,lnl. x I I ran •• r+ql M> al.. n IeILYJI"TTM: I It,le)I 17.11 N llrgq f I Gv T ]•r.f �•—sir►". L:ea I1a'1°�wor! n.o.>a a...o I , n , y ^il ieo w �.' n u..•'nia Biu wN �awwx :'q•IW �Y•a,ata In*.Il iaw"• .we ..M • il. Nw .r GI,F'r•rrCla lrYtlrP•' q . wr.iexl ioMluei ., KG, 'e'Y�- !q lr,�� I . q, . I I ,mq W, ql .rW +ntalllG IY• xY•Y r :GM li. \ .rl,e rr) n ., a «�rrrysr.l` v H,.y,wx• t . xaaC, Yrrrs w,x0u,•naw.. \/��. SNI Q,a ue ,,r ,a,++ r'•F,r]i •�.t'.aay M uFww u4ry�,'Iwl'a•"ws n1 .I NOO "w— w—a.b , . .a0.','nw.N • i..,G»Inrv.w .I law, nl„r,w• w'lq.,„n,w,lllT]]TTn,I ,� ,I•Y�n],=n]. ,e l,r•l] :xll.a tx, a N. a° eln ' e•Y nlln r x�N:nl° :''u;rw !IqN r arx,w INI ,• (11•, a ., v,. x r. rw ar!•yi 'Fan w,�l P �le e]iN'ais r f °I :' tnaWen' :iaaFa '° r �wwa r nwl ;��I . ^M . �n r ., I �xwa ivr)) Y•gr l _:_-«___rte. I le x Mw:wn ei k,.vwt ..: � ! laity r 4uu .f !GSLMa .q a .tFeu + i •'q'wu4n i 1 , � — e1 k ± 0 • • qO a Y O r �• O a 4A m f q )O � 01, O 5• ,.✓ � .r .xi ��iDG A �, �'•�y F klV z � •: r� tai. OQ. w s�,,7 • 4y atl ® ~ oll Us O ilt�,+:, ». ��•�' � � PSP Q a > 4 t 2 W - at..r....�T » 1--1 N i ZDco 7 m Q y jo rt � � J • � 4.8 =gaM � � F r r•A .� +Jp"yM.y»tom, `� i F 9 a b 4 I z " 8•• �.sS" s4 � 3 Y AS�+_$ 3 i`QF&�' ci 3 r r N .'- � a. s Wax' •C�$AadF.�FAF`r 8r�y; s�F��ase�s�;���g� 3�� �gAs � F�g��3'�s�„ W is 5 s,•i, �F W z - C - s+� n &�.v�,< g I�` +. y Y �°FcF i!8 a �SaF."� �i° b S5 9 a ii •r�: ��+�° 6 � BS"�°r"8. 4r �rge�.g t �� Ft� 5t'+ 4 N •� — z n- 7r' i 8 Sr_ G + +0 3' $.A"-. �� 6 kn`+ �"" i�f —°,�- ° tlr�tY fa'j g' f��-.3 S' +��W FA�•e ' ' RF BG"a��-�� ��y�7 1 1.B 8 rA�A$���Y 32p �a ni 5' r R y§pS�i''�v'd'o'�z+ar+jy5 q $�1, aw ��•r,c+''r�'F sasr' "' -T. $„ G+ n ge•Sb a z? r`i°g'-•>�' .��gr •�2 a � S8t 99 is 8 p i= `x'Jilt aSYb�?aiaiia8 � �a�'+p' �'Y'yii 3%� f� 8g $F 9i �'r���•Rg 4 �Ai�e rSPHI Sy;E������g�;"Y�'0Y$4� $_:' �rt` in GrS"• 8a i% Bs� 7G 3 4 = iCL 71 +.p G;ab$ p�ar9`�°+a�WS.Gy �3iaRa i�i�i9i ye 1101" e rgtt C Ar8 yy' gg°y i p '=a i G B 3 y v e"J r Fii e +Sa . i i�fFpn �1d: rb 8 i E s 1 P8 •�. a 8r8 it°F E?$o° +'i o'jYrlt1" 9 "j" gltl;a = e4� lis as p8 gr' $ nor"•" a "g �;�. 4q$.1.,��24'8,aq+'•s3s a srG:„Wgg , ° •a +, gi" }�z� 5�ppqp8G yq^���°n�:�" y in RY r-Ai3iSggf�n.�9a° 3a:°`3�`• � 8 i� Fa �'i , �! r3 <o<gy < oobag a F'y g 1gg F Fabg 3j FigpS� ii ���$z�i6a:az<3�d�'im�xY'.' raOz Jen `'i� \\ •'�h.ary O=ff .+ + \\0�h•1y�'K�ay �^e \'\i•) �'g .•� !<•iry. X969 >+ • Iur°rn /<rJal9r3 afr+w+p I+r y i+11M •Y—, il`N-{ {v+ 4lEi rG '°Jar rrA •1•,rJ IA)Y M1rr•,.rl J•+ • .•14 � '°may/r\> 0311 V7dN/J {rr,.•rraw r, Jr:+m-o1•.r ,v r�.na rrr +. r.rra zd Cy zg W8 6 . .Lb wS t1f~ �44�1° r�• .Ya'041 __S�CfCt- X77 �•.�<'r'+; + 4;�, B e�c Ir, I & r ?Rk�� �� ro •y •e.y� °.po-a , Ji.. i ��{ I xao�a I e � A •�; I :((� I 1 a j �6 a, ;y a` •• .•,y . 'O,I ��:sz.b rI a. I I 7 � __1 -- 'Ma '. '•Y •' � I (lx.µ •' .aa•.M.er v4. I b , +z y b .q;rya.� .x \.. O.OpM aM " rrr,i.. i_I nw <•tia ry�1y I a ° ' e r.F 1a M eiR sioM %�ba%�.��_•--�131A '1r-✓3!'4� � .-- _ a.b � j7;. > GaNi• .ar"• .R -M1 a � Ia �wr..p,• a...., ,a . i , b+ Z18� /��'��, ` -'ti ,t 1 •+may '1.ti Oto 0 CL to ®i.......-.1.-zrroea--iri .3 is 9j� ��� I 1 '1�1 i ;'.. '18 ii •° •b' $ Z yi ::'3 4 3 88ra Ni g 0w i rW 10 Wf" +_ c ♦1 I �ry F i 8 •t r. ' "t rA . _<'�g1.11 f '� e. ' �Fi�i � .P : a s �"s���%9� OQea' �"�w'3 �ar:ez n acne MAas s.< �y5 ,S ji$a = „ y• �Y Iai Q O W _N � Z Z U z}w , araer PM (,) J _ ,aar•a z N J 4.O00 ♦ 3 Fa . a��z t �aa O� AHBa tp� � W y°O -$F �o �� d•iri� ;a = ii +W gg wZW.{� $• aFJ L4________�,r l_,o_l—'_ z.9r.zbwan F 3d 4 �IA N Q + A A i '� 8 �+�a � oall via n sy��-,+7sig. :•�¢ a��ao p 1 eF GF o jq r Q_ qV �ca •Q a�a4 (n 0 _ n n r a Jy •• 6 I C '� am r Ot j �i + •W8<• II 2 �;�;�""rana�n 9..r •,ir YGi H J ��F j ZI N0117_2S M .ar•ui Q 18 SIhVt7 �e'S r^''r Ot� —.1 Y 0 • 0 77 ARM t A_S Z H! x T THIS UISM MT sada mad entered into this day of � MaM , 1961, by and between 'mZ Mie OOMMIZOx, a Florida corporation, hereinafter rsfarred to ae ORAWIM, and R. N. ODCMJ=, TRUSTEE, hereinafter referred to as fRtAWMi _ WITNE¢S2Tx: THAT FOR AND IN OOxSZVMTION of certain mutual promises. given in a lair bargain for exchange, ons to the other, the CR NM has granted, bargained and sold and by these presents does grant, bargain and sell unto the GRAWM, his Min and ossig" a parpstvst eaesnsat for a @anal over, through and ateng the following do"ribed real property, situats, lying aM being in Collier County, Florida. more particularly described one . . . . . test 1s feet of that parties of Station 13, TamLTownship2lra,lRange 259 lying north of the . . . . . . _. SULMT, nevertheless, to the following conditionst 1, The warmest will not interfere with the construction of public roads or public utilities war and "rose this area. 2. Adjacent property owners will hew @areas to the canal for i the purpose of drainage of the adjacent land. 1. In the event the ORANTtt shall vacate or not complete the canal within the period of twelve (12) months free the date of the execution of this document# then it shall rrvert to the GRANTOR, its successors or assigns, without further designation or duty on the GRANTOR. A. That the GRANTEE be charged with the complete maintenance of the canal upon its completion. S. Prior to any construction comencing on said canal, the County Engineer must have approved the final drawings and plans. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the said party of the first part has caused these presents to be executed in its name, and its corporate seal .4-- .-....... .... , w •1 • • • • II A • • `, +,,> to be hereunto affixed, by its proper officers tbarsunto doly�.T 9!r'•. authorised, tha day and year first above written. t c�4.'_t ••� �I,t p'.ift"• •'I�w' TRIA LS CORPORATION tr'•'.'(Vali: 1 • v (Presidset r STATE OF FLORIDA ' COUNTY OF COLLIER • ' I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day personally appeared before • aa, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take . ' acknowledgments, J. F. HUDSON, President 3 .t,, . rt • 4, • corporation, me "` of the TRIANGLE CORPORATION. a Florida to well known to be th+_?erson described in and mho executed the foregoing Easement, l ' ' and ackaibwledged before ma that ha executed the same freely and , voluntarily for the purpose therein expressed as such officer there- • • unto duly authorised; and affixed the corporate seal thereto. WITNESS myhand and seal this dayof _+ k" ��� /� t 1961• ,WI 041 1)t, .1 .p"yV..k,;t tI ti1� �J \,ijil (NOTARY SEAL) . i/ ,_ ',..4 "• .'r' 'o y ' • c ' V.. .. t -"c s oto State of FLORIDA My Commission.Expires: o ;;^ + County of COLLIER �t • Jtrvti- t Netrry Pvt4e.Stets of'Welds e i were • -_n .: . iy Celnelydes icCkw Dras:fres a • I HEREBY CERTIFt�il`XII this i$artw�ye� and correct s,mo.eare••rans wsob.+n.s. • copy of a docurqEn_t,,r iii ied in the'OFFiCIAL RECORDS ot.toi Count' ,Fci,SS rfi%hand . . and official ge. 1111s-bate, 'I0 • U- • ,C')I(,c ' • • DWIG '41 ,[LER `!kf 2OU TS ,..u., c; `' Iiw►i { C.' }y(\..►� .O,' / a)"r ttttr,.•. ti ' .,i:,i t j ;r"i...; :s4S.t. . . • a: ij • r '•::' 't .id't # 4. Al \fit tM• .. i " 440" e `�Y • •••.:' •;4.00 .. ii ? ,• I -- , t,t -' .Y ti • i„ 1 • .. ,$, •'—' t1 4.7:— • 'fes t 1- ,ii, 1 IYIN , *fY l� -. _4,1 .�11), ,f, ...Ail* 4, :r•,;•,;,,•,,04,..,'; = L , _ in. M, �a m h� GiE }/E •• F , t.. a r 4 ' '1, ';,,,,...,;1.11L, ;01:, ?*4-- „.., ''.''',,i'4 e.'? 7;..:',';,..;.,...7?..:i,.,%;.- ", y.,•:-"', .....!..r-,.. ,s 4.-:,-`11-.„ ,'.,jr/iv e-.e, --. ,,.. • <7 gip' a - ^' • -Pfd • $ .. .. " ��} .` . •.,x t t • I 0, ttp://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=53750760003 3/16/201 Latest Sales History 2016 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date _ Book Page Amount . __ .. Land Value _ $ 66,501' 08/10/16 _ 5315-1326 $ 0 (+) ..... ...... improved Value p 140,053' C9/16/05 3891-3561 $ 275,000 -_.._ _ .._... _�__.....$ 0;5/10/04 (-) 3560-272 $ p : Market Value .. ...... .. _.. . $ 206,554 05/01/78 ... _. 748 626 $ 0 t -) ._ ___._.._. _.. _....__.. Save our Home ._._... _...__.._ __..... _ $ 74,637 j 02/01/78 733-34 $ 67,500 (_> Assessed Value $ 131,917 (-) Homestead $ 25,000' (_) School Taxable Value _. $ 106,917; (-) Additional Homestead $ 25,000 (_) Taxable Value $ 81,917 _ . if all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll 0, ttp://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=53750760003 3/16/201 comer %.ounty vropeny Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No. 153750760003 Site Adr. 412 MARATHON CT, NAPLES, FL 34112 Page 1 of s, State ' FL Zip 34112 Permits Tax Yr Issuer Permit # CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg Type _.._..._._......._._ __... _... .._'._._ .___...__._ .. ... ........ _ ..__ .....___._... 1973 COUNTY 73-362 11/08/73 1986 COUNTY 85-3743 09/17/86 ADDITION --. ....,.� _...... _... i .. ... .�. .._.., 1987 COUNTY 87-541 i 10/05/16 ADDITION 2007 COUNTY 0605-1824 i_ _08/12/16y ..1 ADDITION Land Buildin /Extra Features # Calc Code Units 1 # Year Built Description Area AdI Area 10 RESIDENTIAL FF 's 73.34 I # 10 1973 RESIDENTIAL 2099 t 2517 t _ _ .. _ .. r1 L ttp://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=53750760003 3/16/201 Eaeyftetch II 0 jF, • Collier County Property Appraiser SP 40 162 LM Page 1 of http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Docviewer.html?Doctype=Sketches&FolioID=53750760003... 11/18/2016 Fite: 5375076M.m g Area Summary: Code Description Area Adj. Area 1 + 1 Base Giving Area 2099 2098 GAR 70 Garage Attached 704 403 330 SP 10 Screened Porch 40• 39 16 SP 40 Screamed Porch 401 162 66 2703 2516 http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Docviewer.html?Doctype=Sketches&FolioID=53750760003... 11/18/2016 10. 3 I E 0 mi �ry V W e t R O 0 r O u � At 1 mi SURVEY SKETCH OF BOUNDARY SURVEY THE Lacs aN mrs sKErcH m At7r cONsrrruTE OVAERSHDC I NOT FOR FENCE CONSTRUCTION NOTE, TAE INTENT A' THIS SURVEY IS FUR TITLE TRANSFER ONLY AOT FAR CAVSTRU:7/0V CapYRIGHT POI, F.L.A. SURVEYS CORP. A17T FAR DESIGN PAGE 1 OF 3 PROVIDED BY CLIENT SEE REVERS£ SlW FOR PAGE 3 OF 3 STREET ADDRESSP Curve nuvber 1 412 MARATHON COURT NAPLES, FLORIDA Radius= 5800 LOT 5 Delta= 49.2246' BLIXYC H Arc= 4809 I � Tangent- 8299 1, SIR 14 h. Chord= 41.77 A'F 4 Chord Brp. N08'5335'E. N.09.30P92r 41.89'(N) ,E 109%(P%! FIR 5/8' N.7 4 E. 95 6' I I SO2 23'43'E NO ID µM4 IB' AVE�� / I 136.46' (M) VB `� I TIE MARATHON COURT ✓ALK UPVEY LIME cb WB 1 (60' RIQIT OF VAY) 'I '� CONC 4 192' I EIJGf OF PAVEMEN CLI C 3R0' WOOD I o PR F1l�R DRIVE ;6 STEPS 4.5' .0,4 ;hL4� \ a PAVERS D a j \ Y�'7i WALK Z7 I 1 -'?5.6 ___ 27.0' I .�•� \ ENTRY MN O PAVERS \ �9s� VISI IN, I 4 c LOT 4 I r� �fAu NO ID rC� \ BLOCK H 4.0tS \ #412 8l, 95'--�-, W SIACiLE STORY / TP fl 1 `I J VALL a RESIDENCE \P.3' ^ I'w' D ILIb ., CK ry RIGHT OF VA FIR 578' \ \ 19.2' 1 AO ID b j � D I y V PAVERS 6�. "o I VALK AQ 309 LOT 3 BLOCK H SIR J'j�� ff iL04�' � OFFSET EASEN£Nr OVER £ASTI15'1 N OF SEG 13, PER OR. 84, PG 683, MAY 12, 1961, I^ v W E I^ I CERTIFIED TO MICHAEL HAVN AND MONICA C. HAVN j LEGAL DESCRIPTION SCALD P = 30' I I � LOT 4, BLOCK H OF LAKEWOOD UNIT NO 1, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED FIR 5i8' I IN PLAT BOOK 12, PAGE 8, OF THE PUBLIC NO ID 6' RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, DQArNAGE RIGHT OF WAY QUALITY CONTR?1 MEASURED BEARINGS SHOWN ARE BASED ON STATE PLANE COORDINATES (FLORIDA BY : MEF ^_ DATE ;__ 7/25/2016 EAST ZONE) AS ACQUIRED BY USING GPS TECHNOLOGY AND IS THE 'BASIS OF I CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS BEARINGS SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER 5J-17.05, FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION 472.027, FLORIDA STATUTES. CERT'IF'ICATION o Es sa I CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY WAS MADE UNDER MY RESPONSIBLE CHARGE. GRAPHICC SCALE /) ^ NOTE C/y.!_iI(/OJn(// IN COMPLIANCE WITH F.A.C. BY : SURVEY DATE : 7/22/2016 EASEMENT (2) (d) HT OF LOCATION OF EASEMENTS OR RIGHT-OF-WAY OF RECORD, CLINPON W. FIiMTAM7iE. CF'M, PLS #2453 LELAND F. DYSARD, PLS /3859 OTHER THAN THOSE 13N RECORD PLAT, IS MARY E. FDNSTAD, CFM, PSM 05901 REQUIRED, THIS INFORMATION MUST BE FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. NOT VAUD WITHOUT SURVEYOR'S SIGNATURE AND EMBOSSED SEAL NOT A CERTIFICATION OF TITLE, ZONING, EASEMENTS OR FREEDOM OF ENCUMBRANCES. PK1TE, IF APPLrCABLE ACES SHOVN AEAMXR FLORIDA STATUTE 54-17.05 (3) (c); TWO SITE BENCHMARKS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION ON OR AFF LINES IAPPROt.. LOCATMV AVL Y) NOTE, PROPERTY OWNER SHOULD OBTAIN WRITTEN FLOOD ZONE DETERMINATION FROM LOCAL PERMITTING, PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION. 3884 PROGRESS AVE., SUITE 104 REVISIONS NAPLES, FL 34104 F.L.A. SURVEYS CORP. 239-403-1600 FAX 403-8600 PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS do MAPPERS -LB 6569 239-404-7129 239-580-2795 239-250-2792 239-825-8504 PROJECT NO: 9220 BONITA BEACH ROAD, STE 200 DRAWN BY: JCP I PARTY CHIEF: VL BONITA SPRINGS, FL 34135 16-85391—SPC 0 • 0 SURVEY SKETCH OF BOUNDARY SURVEY PAGE 2 OF 3 NOT FOR FENCE CONSTRUCTION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION • NOT FOR DESIGN PHOTO PAGE ,..f,11N, s--. Ir. ::,..: �*r ,__ Y,y...-i.i:ai �n4+. �.��MMt d6 a.^ . t--, , I� f.. ♦d x'04- '4 S .r{r M -,, ,,._ n .e i ii '',1,..---.10.0A-. �. I i • ,a_ t '-4 T „,-,;..,.;',.;!...,..i„I„4,” .r, i '! ''' -‘,.4...„4:;5116h,,,. ...‹ :--' "'4-'-` ' N.r.itr1/4;,- - M ,, ,...:7....). ,;.. iv ,, , ,_„;, _ ,...,..-,.4,1,... ,._,..%__,:, ...„. , ..., ,_..__,,,„,„. , :„,,... , ,...,...:1 , , . "� ��rM it , ±:: ," 1.1 s�I �' `�"` �'" '.. '¢p 13 I i r„. t e - > - ....11.... -- 3884 PROGRESS AVE.,SUITE 104 F. .A. SURVEYS CORP. NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 REVISIONS PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS&MAPPERS-LB 6569 239-403-1600 FAX 403-8600 9220 BONE!A BEACH ROAD,STE.200 BONITA SPRINGS,FLORIDA 34135 PROJECT NO, DRAWN BY:LFD PARTY CHIEF: �N/A 239-403-1600 FAX 403-8600 16-85391 PAGE 3 OF &1. (R)=RADIAL NOT VALID WITHOUT 84. R=RADIUS PAGES 1 AND 2 OF 3 85. RING- ITEM DETECTEDBY METAL DETECTOR BUT NOT RECOVERED 86. RNG= RANGE GENERAL NOTES 87 ABSTRACT NOT REVIEWED 88, RR SPK=(RAILROAD SPIKE • 89. SAT-SATELLITE DISH N=NORTH 90. SDE= STREET DRAINAGE BASEMENT S=SOUTH 91. SEC =SECTION E=EAST 92. SIR=SET SA" IRON ROD WITH LB NUMBER W= WEST, OR ANY COMBINATION THEREOF 93. IBM -TEMPORARY BENCHMARK 1. •=DEGREES 94. TECO= TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY 2. ' = MINUTES WHEN USED IN A BEARING 95. TEL = TELEPHONE FACILITIES 3. "= SECONDS WHEN USED IN A BEARING %. TOB = TOP OF BANK 4. '= FEET WHEN USED IN A DISTANCE 97, TP. TRANSMITTER PAD S. "=INCHES WHEN USED INADISTANCE %. TUB= TECHNOLOGY UTILITY EASEMENT 6. t="MORE OR LESSOR"PLUS OR MINUS" 99- TVR= TELEVISION RISER 7. A=ARC DISTANCE 100. TWP-TOWNSHIP L AC=ACRES 101. UK -UTILITY EASEMENT 9. A/C = AIR CONDITIONING PAD 102. VF = VINYL FENCE 10. AR-ACCESS BASEMENT 103. W=WATER SERVICE 11. B.E.= BUFFER EASEMENT 104- WB=WATER BOX 12. BM=BENCHMARK 105. WF=WOODFENCE 13. BOB =BASIS OF BEARING 106- WPP=WOODPOWER POLE 14. ERG =BEARING 107. WRFC= WITHLACOOCHEE RIVER ELECTRIC �• 15. CB=CURVE NUMBER COMPANY / X116. C=CALCULATED 10& A= DELTA OR CENTRAL ANGLE OF CURVE 17. CB = CATCH BASIN 109. DIMENSIONS ARE IN FEET AND IN DECIMALS 18. CHB = CHORD BEARING THEREOF 19. CHD=CHORD 110. ELEVATIONS SHOWN HEREON ARE NAVD 1988 20. CLF -CHAINLINK FENCE UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED 21. CM= CONCRETE MONUMENT Ill. ALL PHYSICAL IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN WITHOUT 22. CO= CLEAN OUT DIMENSIONS ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL 23. CONC = CONCRETE PURPOSES ONLY. THAT THEY DO EXIST, BUT WERE 24. CP = CONCRETE PAD NOT NECESSARILY MEASURED IN THE FIELD. 25. CSW =CONCRETE SIDEWALK 112. NOTE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED BY CLIENT 26. CTV=CAaLzTVRisn UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 27. CUE= COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY 113. EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAYS SHOWN ARE PER EASEMENT RECORDED PLAT OR AS FURNISHED BY THE CLIENT 28. D = DEED 114. FOUNDATION LINE BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE 29. DE- DRAINAGE EASEMENT GROUND IS NOT REFLECTED 30. DH= DRILL HOLE 115, THIS SURVEY IS NOT TO BE USED FOR 31. DI = DROP INLET CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES UNDER ANY 32, ELEC-ELECTRIC CONDITION UNLESS OTHERWISE STATED 33. EOP = EDGE OF PA VEMENT 116. NO UNDERGROUND INSTALLATIONS OR 34. EOR = EDGE OF ROAD IMPROVEMENTS HAVE BEEN LOCATED EXCEPT AS 35. EOW=EDGEOF WATER NOTED 36. F= AS LABELED OR FOUND IN THE FIELD 117. NO INSTRUMENTS OF RECORD REFLECTING 37, F.A.C.= FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE EASEMENTS, RIGHT OFWAYS, AND/OROWNERSHIP 38. FCC- FOUND CROSS CUT WERE FURNISHED THIS SURVEYOR EXCEPT AS SHOWN 39. FCM =FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT Il& THERE ARE NO VISIBLE ENCROACHMENTS EXCEPT 40. FEMA = FEDERAL EMERGENCY THOSE AS DELINEATED ON THIS PLAT OF SURVEY MANAGEMENT AGENCY 119. TIES ARE TOFMLD LINES UNLESS OTHERWISE 41. FDH = FOUND DRILL HOLE NOTED 42. FFE = YU45H FLOOR ELEVATION 120• THERE MAY BE ADDITIONAL RESTRICTIONS 43. FH = FIRE HYDRANT AND/OR EASEMENTS THAT ARE NOT RECORDED ON a4. FIP = FOUND IRON PIPE SAID PLAT THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THE PUBLIC 45. FIR =FOUND IRON ROD RECORDS OF THIS COUNTY 46. FN=FOUNDNAIL 121. FENCES MEANDER ON AND OFF LINE, 4.7. FND - FOUND APPROXIMATE LOCATION ONLY UNLESS STATED 48. FPK=FOUND PK NAIL OTHERWISE. 49. FPK&D = FOUND PK NAIL AND DISC 722. THE LIMON THIS SKETCH DO NOT CONSTITUTE 5O. GTE=TELEPHONE RISER OWNERSHIP $l. ILLEG. - ILLEGIBLE LB OR PSM NUMBER 127• THE INTENT OF THIS SURVEY IS FOR TITLE 52. LB - LICENSED BUSINESS TRANSFER ONLY 53. LBE= LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT 124. FLORIDA STATUTE: TWO SITE BENCHMARKS ARE 54. LME - LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION. 55. LP = LIGHT POLE 12S. THIS SURVEY DOES NOT REFLECT OR DETERMINE %. M=MEASURED OWNERSHIP, 57. ME - MAINTENANCE EASEMENT 126. 121. F.E.MA. FLOOD HAZARD MAPPING: THIS DATE 58. MH = MANHOLE PRODUCT WAS NOT DESIGNED TO MAKE PRECISE IN/OUT 59. NA VD 1988 - NORTH AMERICAN VERTICAL FLOOD RISK DETERMINATIONS. THIS PRODUCT IS NOT DATUM OF 1988 SUITABLE FOR ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS AND CANNOT 60. 14GVD 1929 - NATIONAL GEODETIC BE USED TO DETERMINE ABSOLUTE DELINEATIONS OF VERTICAL DATUM OF 1929 FLOOD BOUNDARIES. CALL 1477•FEMAMAP OR EMAIL A 61. NOID= NO IDENTIFYING MARKINGS MAP SPECIALIST AT: 62. (NR)=NON-RADIAL HTTP://WWW.FZMA.CDV/nAN/PUVENTIMMhSD EMAP.SHT 63. NTS=NOT TO SCALE PROPERTY OWNER SHOULD OBTAIN WRITTEN FLOOD 64. OHP= OVERHEAD POWER ZONE DETERMINATION FROM LOCAL PERMITTING, 65. OHU = OVERHEAD UTILITY LINE PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ANY 66. O.R. = OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK CONSTRUCTION PLANNING AND/OR CONSTRUCTION 67. P=FIAT 127. IN COMPLIANCE WITH F.A.C. SJ. 17.052(2)(Dx4)-IF 68. PC = POINT OF CURVATURE LOCATION OF EASEMENTS OR RIGHT-OF-WAY OF 69. FCC - POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE RECORD, OTHER THAN THOSE ON RECORD PLAT, IS 70. PCP- PERMANENT CONTROL POINT REQUIRED, THIS INFORMATION MUST BE 71. PG = PAGE FURNISHED TO THE SURVEYOR AND MAPPER 72. PI = POINT OF INTERSECTION 128, IF APPLICABLE, FENCES SHOWN MEANDER ON OR 73. PK- PARKER KALON NAIL OFF LINES (APPROXIMATE LOCATION ONLY) 74. PLS = PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 129. ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES, SUCH AS FURRING 75. POB = POINT OF BEGINNING STRIPS, SIDING, CORNICES, STUCCO, ETC., OUTSIDE 76. POC- POINT OF COMMENCEMENT THE LINE OF THE STRUCTURE HAVE BEEN TAKEN 77. PP=POWER POLE INTO ACCOUNT WHEN GIVING TIES FROM THE 76. PRC = POINT OF REVERSE CURVE STRUCTURE TO THE LOT LINES. 79. PRM - PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT 80. PSM- PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER 81. PU & DE = PUBLIC UTILITY & DRAINAGE EASEMENT 82. PUB= PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT c 0 All wosk under the approved u ng permit shall comply with all applicable laws, codes. ordinances and additional stipulations and/or Conditions of Permit. The approved permit expires if work authorized is not commenced within six (6) months from date of issue. The permit fee will be quadrupled, plus a maximum daily penalty of $500.00 if work is started without an approved permit. The permittee further understands that only licensed contractors may be employed and that the structure shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. w. Signature of Contractor x `' White Applicant Green property Appraiser Yellow Record Section "FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE Pink Environmental Health MECHANICS' LIEN LAW CAN RESULT IN wig Goldenrod Lobby File THE PROPERTY OWNER PAYING TWICE Building Cc& earnownce FOR BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS." FS 713.135 1.10-83 - BUILDING PERMIT •IJNJ� —Le .. .. ._....-.rl3, .'�b;ixiu:P.S,w«awr...+........ e..e:« 51.' 'r:J•1f�whon Court sx:tt^-''':40 r.».,. .. r.+a. P,•.o-«, rnJ I Owl.wr t4li< Vic,:'i Aa3ri-ms..F,..e .,>.<:.r 4.i r. :+9a:a.Cst+et 'yiurt ..p)....n ,39 "'.V0017 i 'Lc._.,»pi'locaa;?'�u:;ci.v3'pr.a ..,,., r. •�,°�—ii-'.l r'Ji1X x•71.1 tau 3.'u ..9 ':.. ;,. •.xaa.r«a. soar ,. ..CS 6,�.4:4➢419� ' --'C+LL�.r ar.•,Fpa ars r. Pa. cpJs.• ^ ' -'Hii l.'.:. -t: it -'.M1 y:r.w rn,a. ries t. �a ..u,.. ItL .. HY ,:4R5n a t a ALAI �n ^. gty{Ik..1. •'.%f t�! a.. .. r. l.u':'. . ,..r •.+n.s..r es ,Jr..... :9a45f"«1:S.i,iVi 4,ua. - i;a:.ac 711 �'.aii'•.i;i: 1 S1itL:'.:.iG ....,:..r.r .>,aa. n .. 4`J Y�.p..n •iii _.�.. a. Y'.'.': is 3. : a. •) . r u . ^ ; vc'. ,. 1•'�S'1"a11.ti .:S �.T:J: ;>'7. .,.,a r>, ... .. .+•-.--:ft4; ' The above application has been examined and is hereby approved subject to the payment of $ as provided by the Collier County Building Code. Payment Received by: Date Issued:�� Receipt No. i All wosk under the approved u ng permit shall comply with all applicable laws, codes. ordinances and additional stipulations and/or Conditions of Permit. The approved permit expires if work authorized is not commenced within six (6) months from date of issue. The permit fee will be quadrupled, plus a maximum daily penalty of $500.00 if work is started without an approved permit. The permittee further understands that only licensed contractors may be employed and that the structure shall not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. w. Signature of Contractor x `' White Applicant Green property Appraiser Yellow Record Section "FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE Pink Environmental Health MECHANICS' LIEN LAW CAN RESULT IN wig Goldenrod Lobby File THE PROPERTY OWNER PAYING TWICE Building Cc& earnownce FOR BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS." FS 713.135 1.10-83 E E 0 ki—I'd lilt • C 0 ' t 7� � •• � 'T L1f i� � t � V I i i �: 4 I tz; . aIV3 \ 19 s J I • C 0 f- �11 • APPLICATION FOR BUILDING PERMIT 87 4541 FEB Q 6. 87 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Permit No. TO THE APPLICANT: Pleew complete the following form by Wisilq M printing Applicati Name o Project Job Ad( Water Management Engineer Architect Engineer (Structural) ___ _ -------------------- --------------------------- Tn�+� 5 n n r n 9r. - COMPETENCY CONTRACTORS': l/!//J �-V' �C"�—`,�' STATE REGISTRATION NO. CARD NO. General Contractor: Name 1(J)!C _,y� -�, Dk ,5 r),f _ General Contractor's Arres, u/2 %1j�g12Ar -l{ 0 s1/ C� Person to Contact y' ��' N r� S Phone 2 - Electrical Contractor: Name Plumbing Contractor: Name A/C -Mach. Contractor: Name Roofing Contractor: Name •-------------------------------------------- ------------------- --- ----. _.. GENERAL LOCATION: Whack One) 1 2 s s 5 e T a a 10 n •--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- LEGAL: ( Subdivision Name e4'g A OR Complete Description: Tract Lot Block Unit (Private legal covenants may exist regulating this property. It Is the owner's obligation to ensure that this construction would not vlolsta time legal covenants. -Resolution 62.51-) ❑ J if at ,leets TYPE OF STRUCTURE: (Circle One) SingleFemil . Ie Home Duplex . Multi -Family . Church . Motel/Hotel Commercial . Industrial . Service Station Off' /Bank School Hospital Pool/SpaSeawall/Dock us p ------------------------ ------------------=---lte—ration------ — iton — ---- ----------------- CONSTRUCTION: ---- (arel.On- ----Naw—__ A----- Add PUSTRUCTI RPOSE OF CONSTRUCTION: Explain 6 ea0LlJbf_ "yr'1.IQ V,40-/ Al � _/JJ Electrical: Amps IExomphs: Frame dome. Conerate block avuctum (Cam). Interior Psrdtiens, mesh Addition. Room Addition, Enclose Parch, stc.) ---------------- —----- --'--------- --"------ —---------- —------- -•.------ —------ -------- ------ No. of Now Residential Dwelling Units Maximum Height of Proposed Structure No. of Stories ------------^----------- ------------------- --------------___------ ES WER: (Circle One) Septic Collier County City of Naples Private System Name------_~------�--- WATER: (circle One) Well Collier County City of Naples Private System None ---------------------------------- ---- --------------------------_----.._----- ---- OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION: Residential Assembly Sq. Ft. Living Area Sq. Ft. Business Sq. Ft. Porch Areas Sq. Ft. Educational Sq. FT. Carport Areas Sq. Ft. Storage Sq. Ft. Garage Sq. Ft. Hazardous Sq. Ft. Total Sq. Ft. Mercantile Sq. Ft. -----------^------------------------------1 Factory Industrial Sq. Ft. ENERGY CODE: E.P.I. Number i Institutional Sq Ft. --------------------------------- ------I _ Contractor's COST OF CONSTRUCTION S --_-; - Total ------------------ Sq. Ft_-, -------------- �------------------ ----- --------------- FLOOD INSURARCiINFORMATION Bench Mark Elevation 1. Flood Zone on 2a. A Zone - lowest habitable floor elevation: 2b. Y Zone - lowers[ hors amber .lavation: Date Permit Approved _/^1— by Date Permit Issued ___/—J_by ----------------------------------------------- ---- ----__- ------ All work under the approved bullring Permit shall comply with e6 applinbie laws, soft, ordinances and additional stipulations and/or Conditions of PrrilMI. The approved Permit expires If work authorised is not commenoed within six 10) months from data of Issue. The Permit fes will be quadrupled. Plus a maximum daily penalty of $5t10Af) if work Is started without an eptlfpvad permit. The pwmhtae furtMr urtdersprrds that my gpn"d contractors may to employed and That the structure shall Mt M cad er odeo(ad until a Certiflwte Of OoeuPm•Y N lord. Sworn to and Subscribed before me Signature of Contractor chi, I.G._ fav o1 ,19 Y 7 r Y:� 17% - "FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE Np y Public MECHANICS' LIEN LAW CAN RESULT IN`s a�nding cad. Cempa.no THE PROPERTY OWNER PAYING TWICE FOR BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS." FS 713.135 Telephone Number Telephone Number Telephone Number w BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION Permit liutnber i 87-00541 Application Data ..... •........ 02/06/87 Last Name of ON" r....rs.•.sra.s�.• DeSaati■ f First Ne�e.a..e.............:. Vincent middle Initial ... .rr..:s..s.... 1« Project No". ... Pato edditioA Job ....so .412 Marathon Court Geo-Coder�..r...r....•rr..YYr� General CeaCrACCD'C.a...Y•...f.1s... Owner Contractor's Ad.draEa.,..Y.s.tY:.,.. 412 Harathon Court Person" t0 Contaet.;r•...•.►.rr.Y.., Sere the owner Telephone 1�wabsro.,Y.....Y..N• 775-2221 General Location .... Four Subdivision .... ..•.......a.... Lakewwod Lot.•(r't.tN4F..tY.4.t•tNtYstf•Y. '4 B10Ck+�s:s.•t•.t...r.t...:•r.4 H Unite...: u..Y.rs.r.r.......a. I Legal DescliPrloaN.vss.�..r..• Type of StrtlGCure•...Nt..sir►...sr• Single—Fas111F/Add COaatrtictloII•....�'tN.•s•vr.........• Addition Purpose of Constructioh000 .,...... CBS patio addition Ifunber.of Dwelling unit*......rt.+. 0 Setrlr.........�•..r.r..'. t.r..r ..r ' Wa.ter.r....�.......,rrr,..as.. Occupancy C laae.,r..•r.1r....rr..rs Residential Coat of Coustructiuon......j........ 48,000 Flood 20IIa......e....s.rv►.......... . Bench '{ark Elevation... ....... Reach xark Nail into....a. rr w• Data Permit Approved,...........`... ZONING: �f as Preliminary Approval Land Zoned Proposed Use f 4, Approved by r.. Da_t_ep_-71!1J /— UTILITIES DIVISION 00 W N WATER CONNECTION FEES REQUIRED: YES OR NO J 4. SEWER CONNECTION FEES REQUIRED: YES OR-' SEWER DISPOSAL APPROVAL LETTER DATED 1 i APPROVED BY Date''./�/ NOTE: "YES" denotes need for paid receipt of eonnecdon fees prior to Issuance. U'i;LITi_S DIVISION APPROVAL NOT REQUIRED FOR CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY ON THIS PERMRr, Bulk Ma �n �• 9/01/84 y p aS i 3 F� tau • • 0 • 0 ZONING: BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION 87-00541 �.,.I l Date .....:..:..... 02/06/87 DeSsutis Vincent :331....:.:.:•i...•. J. :e...i...::eiii..e•: Patio addition ' s..e.e...ii.:ii:ei:• 412 Marathon Court ri.ee. •. •.eea•eees:: General t:OIIttaCtOtee..e:'.eee.ieii.e own" Contractorla Addtes3:i.ei.:.... .e.i 412 Marathon Const Person to Contact...iie4ee..eei.e:. Same as owner Telephone Number ... ..:•ii..... 775-2221 General Locationi.e.ie...e..eeeee.. Four Subdivision...ii.....:eeeeeii. Lakewvod LOti.eee.e..ee:e....i...:.iie• 4 IIIIit....ieeeeeee.:.:::ee.:.ie• 1 Legal Desctiptioni... i.:i.:.e. Type Of Stttnctute:e:•..e.e:.e:..e.i single-Family/Add C011111tructiOnee.9i..:eia*.ee.......e Addition Purpose of Construction....eeeei..: CBS patio addition Number of Dwelling Units ....:..•.. 0 $eWeti:eeeii:.::..:u ...eeii•. Occupancy Claesi........ieeie.:.:ii Residential Coat of Coustruction.:...e.•...iiie $80000 Flood ZOIIeeeeee.e..:i:.eie. e.iee.:: Bench Mark Elevatione.:ieeeeeo Bench Mark Nail ini.... i:.e.ee _ Date Permit Approved.....ii..eseeee Preliminary Approval BUILDING DEPARTMENT Building Permit Electrical Permit Plumbing Permit Mechanical Permit Gas Permit Swimming Pool or Spa Permit "Building Code Compliance 0e114111ni"W' Permit Land Zoned Proposed Use Approved by FIRE DISTRICT (Ord* ones N. Naela - Earl Nrplw - As oe Uttle Nkrkery/Smite shoe. - lmmokaNe - 81a ilro'wr Fire Prevention Permit i Approved By: OM -1 Checked BY: Dee / I • Whia: 8uedkia Oran:Fre Yellow: tMBtkn Pink: Heam coia.arod, Public wmb 9/01184 ,;r Approved By: - Dene / r� S Approved By: Date, S Approved BY: Data = Approved Br. Dee — $ Approved Br Date_ /— = Approved By: Date s Approved BY:/— S `< Approved By: Prif. .,- - Daps 1—:i /-Z2 Date FIRE DISTRICT (Ord* ones N. Naela - Earl Nrplw - As oe Uttle Nkrkery/Smite shoe. - lmmokaNe - 81a ilro'wr Fire Prevention Permit i Approved By: OM -1 Checked BY: Dee / I • Whia: 8uedkia Oran:Fre Yellow: tMBtkn Pink: Heam coia.arod, Public wmb 9/01184 • -3910& Afd-.", LAKEWOOD SINGLE FAMILY HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION I, INC. BUILDING & EXTERIOR CHANGE REQUEST This form is to be completed by the owner or contractor for exterior The documents of the Lakewood S ��, alterations, or construction on any homeowner's lot. must be obtained before � Tam31y Homeowners Association 1, Inc., state that the approval by the Board of Directors any work can begin. Examples are: swimming pools, spas; awnin shuttersneonstruon, and changes j , w ccti of exterior color, roof replacement, driveway coatings, ma landscaping or changes in the exterior of your property. All new construction and/or additions must be accompanied by bluep;nts. LOCATION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION Name: j Phooe:2�C/ 46 o TYPE OF PROPOSED CONSTRU N: Commencement Date:. Q_N' /F—OfJy.^l tts / Completion Date 1pij (✓ TO ACCOMPANY THIS FORM: e rOh rl r Yi a. Blueprints of new construction and/or additions ✓ / b. Plot Plan (copy of survey) of lot showing location of proposed addition ✓ screen enclosure is proposed, the height and color should be noted on the plan d. Ifre fing, include a color sample e. If re -painting, the brand name ofthe paint and sample colors with overall and trim colors indicated lite aforementioned paint chart or drawing and plot plan (survey) should accompany this form at the time of neighbors' signature. This is a courtesy to your neighbors so they may be aware of your improvement. Signatures should be from your immediate neighbors to the left and right and across the street if the improvement is in front, and to the rear if in back. N' NEIGame t c '-- n et rx m t) (Please circle) _Rent (If construction in back ofproperty,your neighbor ,��a If you have any questions or concerns regarding your neighbor's iB E I V E mpntvements, place tail the management tC �..A' e: Alliance Management, LLC 3806 Exchange Avenue, Naples, FL 34104 (239)331-3772 Faz (239) 331-4103 ------------------- BOARD OF DIRECTORS ACnON: Approve ---- Di------------------------------------------- rove Comments: pP Date 7—/ President/Vice Preside Date %"/ You will be notified in writing of the Board's action. Thank you for your cooperation. bor to your left) A17, OW14q. (Please c %1W . �►' .III'�w ;7.;�.: LI Date Address c '-- n et rx m t) (Please circle) _Rent (If construction in back ofproperty,your neighbor ,��a If you have any questions or concerns regarding your neighbor's iB E I V E mpntvements, place tail the management tC �..A' e: Alliance Management, LLC 3806 Exchange Avenue, Naples, FL 34104 (239)331-3772 Faz (239) 331-4103 ------------------- BOARD OF DIRECTORS ACnON: Approve ---- Di------------------------------------------- rove Comments: pP Date 7—/ President/Vice Preside Date %"/ You will be notified in writing of the Board's action. Thank you for your cooperation. 0 (moo :y�te earth R1elters� K 20 AI wo 4 �, -/-o -jE)VE JUN 21 2016 av; IVO N-T 8068 T-r S BR SM2rAFF tv D-P CCWDH o �' 35 CHidar 4=S1r:60'h o ptopoew r 35 car vex a� m 4-5`w: tv h r: BE' AFF al.W cewmg SM AM 35 CRMw O O=5'v►:6w h I 8'-?Bdxft� WE 11 2M This Instrutbent Prepared by: Peter T. Flood 125 North Airport Road Suite 202 Naples, Florida 34104 239-263-2177 ptllaw@gmail.com CERTIFICATE. OFT RUST EXISTENCE AND AUTHORITY Reference: The Monica Calvert Hawn Revocable Living Trust dated August 18, 2016 The undersigned, Monica Calvert Hawn , being duly sworn, deposes and says as follows: 1. That Affiant(s), whose address is 412 Marathon Court, Naples, Florida 34102 is the Grantor under The Monica Calvert Hawn Revocable Living Trust, under Trust Agreement dated August 18, 2016 (the "Trust"). 2. That the referenced Trust empowers the trustee to sell, convey, mortgage, manage or lease any and all real estate subject to the Trust. 3. That the Trust remains in full force and effect and has not been amended. 4. That the current trustee is: Monica Calvert ]lawn Grantor Trustee 412 Marathon Court Naples, Florida 34102 6. This certificate is made pursuant to FSA 689.071(1), for the purposes of a purchaser or other party to rely upon the information contained herein without further examination of the Trust and Amendments referenced herein. 7. That the referencedsh� rued by Florida Law Monica Calvert Hawn ' Grantor Trustee Witness State of Florida County of Collier n On r I�itltl t'-_, 2017 before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Monica Calvert Hawn who is ✓ personally known to me or provided - as identification WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public (SEAL) { t �..•� 1-l11\ . I Printed Signature of Notary + LINDA ANDERSON MY co , JO 7 F" 66730 �an� *** 3699440 OR: 3891 PG: 3561 *** General Warranty Deed Made this September 15, 2005 A.D. By Vincent J. DeSantis as Trustee of the Vincent J. DeSantis Trial, dated February 15, 1990, whose address is: 412 Marathon Court, Naples, Florida 34112, hereinafter called the grantor, to C. Michael Hawn and Monica C. Hawn, husband and wife, whose post office address is: 4410 Lakewood Blvd., Naples, FL 34112, hereinafter called the grantee: (Whenever used herein the term "grantor" and "grants" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, asd the successors and assigns of corporations) Witnesseth, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, ($10.00) and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confums unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in Collier County, Florida, viz: Lot 4, Block H of LAKEWOOD UNIT NO 1, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 12, Page 8, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Parcel 1D Number: 5375076003 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments,a V SUBJECT TO (1) ad valorem and non 0 real props building code and other use restrictions impo emmental authority; i and (4) restrictions, reservations and easemn_ subdiv_ission, Property for residential purposes.a =:tl To Have and to Hold, the i� thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. year of closing and subsequent years; (2) zoning, ing oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any; tat none of the foregoing shall prevent use of the And the grantor hereby covenan " aid grantee that the d la seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell a said land; that the gr a ully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all per soever; and that a is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2004, C I 4fljf �c il In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has si a cd these presents the day and year fust above written. Si ed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witness Printed Name Robert D. Andrews �ncei 1) Vt J. DeSa R rustee of the Vincent J. DeSantis Trust Address: 412 Marath Cotut. Naples Florida 34! 12 �r'' Witness Printed Nam/e o J0 Address: State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 15th day Sept` ber, 20,5, Vincent J. Santis as Trustee of the Vincent I. DeSantis Trust, who is/are personally known to me or who has prods �' identification. k� M- ,� R08ERt D. ANDREWS Notary Public jog %Nom F � • StpM of Florida Print Name:__ Rnl]P_-�rt D- A ads. bosallow 18, 2006 •a Commission N DD 373213 My Commission Expires: o s'`f°.`..`* DondedDy alonaiNotaNA- DEED Individual Warranty Decd - Legal on Face Closers' Choice • HCOIDID in OFFICIAL IICORDS of COLLIER COMM, IL Prepared by: 09/16/2005 at 12;50PN DEIOIT I. IROCE, C1ERE Robert Andrews CONS 275000100 Preferred Title of Florida, LLC RIC FEE 10100 4980 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 200 DOC"170 1925.00 Naples, Florida 34103 Reta: PRIFIRRID TITLI OI FLORIDA File Number: PTF05-0288 6910 TANIANI TR 11200 EAPLIS FL 34103 General Warranty Deed Made this September 15, 2005 A.D. By Vincent J. DeSantis as Trustee of the Vincent J. DeSantis Trial, dated February 15, 1990, whose address is: 412 Marathon Court, Naples, Florida 34112, hereinafter called the grantor, to C. Michael Hawn and Monica C. Hawn, husband and wife, whose post office address is: 4410 Lakewood Blvd., Naples, FL 34112, hereinafter called the grantee: (Whenever used herein the term "grantor" and "grants" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, asd the successors and assigns of corporations) Witnesseth, that the grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of Ten Dollars, ($10.00) and other valuable considerations, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, hereby grants, bargains, sells, aliens, remises, releases, conveys and confums unto the grantee, all that certain land situate in Collier County, Florida, viz: Lot 4, Block H of LAKEWOOD UNIT NO 1, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 12, Page 8, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Parcel 1D Number: 5375076003 Together with all the tenements, hereditaments,a V SUBJECT TO (1) ad valorem and non 0 real props building code and other use restrictions impo emmental authority; i and (4) restrictions, reservations and easemn_ subdiv_ission, Property for residential purposes.a =:tl To Have and to Hold, the i� thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining. year of closing and subsequent years; (2) zoning, ing oil, gas and mineral interests of record, if any; tat none of the foregoing shall prevent use of the And the grantor hereby covenan " aid grantee that the d la seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell a said land; that the gr a ully warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all per soever; and that a is free of all encumbrances except taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2004, C I 4fljf �c il In Witness Whereof, the said grantor has si a cd these presents the day and year fust above written. Si ed, sealed and delivered in our presence: Witness Printed Name Robert D. Andrews �ncei 1) Vt J. DeSa R rustee of the Vincent J. DeSantis Trust Address: 412 Marath Cotut. Naples Florida 34! 12 �r'' Witness Printed Nam/e o J0 Address: State of Florida County of Collier The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 15th day Sept` ber, 20,5, Vincent J. Santis as Trustee of the Vincent I. DeSantis Trust, who is/are personally known to me or who has prods �' identification. k� M- ,� R08ERt D. ANDREWS Notary Public jog %Nom F � • StpM of Florida Print Name:__ Rnl]P_-�rt D- A ads. bosallow 18, 2006 •a Commission N DD 373213 My Commission Expires: o s'`f°.`..`* DondedDy alonaiNotaNA- DEED Individual Warranty Decd - Legal on Face Closers' Choice • • AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION ..-9.:-.. ; - FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) c ; , � - `'-•'t-, � '� L. `'f (print name), as 1 ,�_-•�4 < r� �.� (title, if applicable) ofrt ,. .. (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant _J:- contract purchaser __._ and that: 1. I hav¢ full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize ibA; : ', _ to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. `Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pros. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L. L. C.) or Limited Company (L. C.), then the docualents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member. " • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership, • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the `general partner" of the named partnership. • if the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under ppnatties'of pequry, ( declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the f 9ft stated )n it ape t,1l" ; _.- f" ° r ` �' -� • l_ f ^ f' L�' �., f �i � � ) .'� rte,. Signabure--{ _ Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on �,i.�! 0 -Li�-(date) by U1 i t r'. i.. ti__" c ,., w Lu (name (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification) as identification. STAMPiSEAL Sig�re of NoWy NDRSON 4a;Y 29 CP\08-CoA-00115\155 RFV 3/24/14 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS($) • I, e, (print (print name), as (title, if applicable) of (company, If applicable), swear or ;affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner applicant_ contract purchaser _ and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance vuith this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upo} the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions impoj!�.i th appro action. 5. Well authorize_-�V�, 01 �tt.1.- to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition irfeWding 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the c&p. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L. L. C.) or Limited Company (L. C.), then the documents'. should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member" • if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership, • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words as trustee, • in each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., indlvldual, corporate, trust, partnership; and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. • Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregolpq Affidavit of Authorization and that the eta din true Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on 710 I /`t6; (date)!by y1 ,vin, Mtch4�1�,c.,v, (name of per on vid' oath or affirmation), as who is personally known to me or, o p used �,e (type of identificatioi,J as identification._ STAMP/SEAL rnANCIEao enVIER ALYAfiEZ Wy COMM SSON t FF 924415 EXPIRES: WOW 5, 2019 '%��',;wn�' a»aodrn:v!�oa7wsrcummmee:s i CP108-C:OA-001151155 REV 3/24/14 Co ter County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergoy.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department, PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP'(Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR '(Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) rZ]r (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard R,zone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION o subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable; if already assigned) CA- • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAPPIES (if applicable) N�, SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP _-_—or Ar: or PL # COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application: indicate{ whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: ,/Email p L� ❑ Pax ❑ Personally picked u Applicant Name:vi, a� Phone: L+0If-- LFCl-ZZ Email/Fax: k—VLW V1sk-i CL-ot C-0� Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations', Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number f Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: [late: Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN G MONTHS, FORM MUST BE • UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED • LAKEWOOD SINGLE FAMILY HOMES I A55OCIATION CIO Alliance Management 3806 Exchange Avenue Naples, FL 34104 Phone: (239) 331-3772 Fax: (239) 331-4103 July 13, 2016 Michael & Monica Hawn 412 Marathon Court Naples, FL 34112 Re: Building & Exterior Change Request Dear Mr. and Mrs. Hawn: Please be advised that the Board of Directors of Lakewood Single Family Homes I have approved your request for the lanai enclosure. i Should you have any additional questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (239) 331-3772. Sincerely, Richard H. Knoll, CAM Property Manager For Lakewood Single Family Homes I COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.collierizov.net CoY County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 VARIANCE PETITION APPLICATION Variance from Setbacks Required for a Particular Zoning District LDC section 9.04.00 & Code of Laws section 2-83 — 2-90 Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMB'c't To be completed by stoff PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Michael & Monica Hawn Address: 412 Marathon Ct city: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34112 Telephone: 239404-4972 Cell: 239-404-4972 Fax: E -Mail Address: hawnski@aol.com or mchtkt@aol.com Name of Agent: Tatiana Gust Firm: Elite Consulting of SWFL Address: 2670 Horseshoe Dr N city. Naples State: FL ZIP: 34104 Telephone: 239-280-0570 cell: 239-285-9929 Fax; 239-529-4774 E -Mail Address: tatiana@eliteswfl.com w:. BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 6/4/2014 Page 1 of 6 L-] • CA o er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www-collierizov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY INFORMATI Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: 53750760003 Section/Township/Range: 13_ 50 25 Subdivision: Lakewood Unit: 1 Lot: 4 Block: H Metes & Bounds Description: Lakewood Unit 1 blk H Lot 4 Total Acreage: 0.21 Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 412 Marathon Ct ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: Front: 30 Corner Lot: Yes ❑ No 0 Side: 7.5 Waterfront Lot: Yes ❑ No Q Rear: 25 Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) imme4: ate1v. 6/4/2014 Page 2 of 6 Zoning Land Use N RSF3 Single Family S RSF3 Single Family E RMF6 Condominium W RSF3 Single Family Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: Front: 30 Corner Lot: Yes ❑ No 0 Side: 7.5 Waterfront Lot: Yes ❑ No Q Rear: 25 Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) imme4: ate1v. 6/4/2014 Page 2 of 6 _� Goter County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collieraov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/Index.aspx?page=774. v Name of Homeowner Association: Lakewood Single Family Homes I Association Mailing Address: 3806 Exchange Avenue City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34104 Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: NATURE OF PETITION On a separate sheet, attached to the application, please provide the following: 1. A detailed ovplanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased property; when existing principal structure was built (include building permit number(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. 2. For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a -h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. 10 6/4/2014 Page 3 of 6 1 0 Co er Count COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. C) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? 4. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? 6/4/2014 Yes R No If yes, please provide copies. Page 4 of C -, Cots County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Variance Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW P OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application download current form from County website) Pre -Application Meeting Notes 1 Project Narrative CQMplgled Addressing Chec list 1 Conceptual Site Pian 24" x 36" and one 8 Y. " x 11" cop Survey of property showing the encroachment measured in feet) 2 Affidjyit of Au h rization signed and notarized 2 Deeds/Le al's 3 Location map 1 Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend 5 ❑ ❑ included on aerial Historical Survey Sr waiver request 1 Environmental Data Requirements or exemption justification 3 Once the first set of review comments are posted, provide the assigned 1 ❑ ❑ tanner the Property Dwner Advisory Letter and Certification Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all 1 ❑ ❑ materials to be submitted electronically In PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 6/4/2014 Page 5 of 6 7 C7 • 10 0 0 t_ Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following reviewers: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet Addressing: Annis Moxam Graphics: Mariam Ocheltree ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Historical Review ❑Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet ❑ Immoklee Water/Sewer District: Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Transportation Pathways: Stacey Revay ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock Engineering: Alison Bradford Transportation Planning: John Podczerwinsky ❑ Other: ❑ Utilities Engineering: Kris Vanlengen FEE REQUIREMENTS C Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 C Variance Petition: o Residential- $2,000.00 o Non -Residential- $5,000.00 o ,5u' and Subsequent Review- 20% of original fee Estima►rd Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.00 C After The Fact Zoning/Land Use Petitions: 2x the normal petition fee C Listed Species Survey (if EIS is not required): $1,000.00 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples. FL 34104 Applic nt Signature Printed Name 6/4/2014 Date Page 6 of 6 Collier County Building Department February 281", 2017 2800 Horseshoe Dr. N Naples, FL 34104 Re: Variance Request 412 Marathon Ct 1. There is an existing single family residence located at 412 Marathon Ct. The current minimum setbacks are Front 30', sides 7.5', and rear 25'. The current residence has a rear setback of 18.9' including a lanai that Mr. & Mrs. Hawn would like to convert into living space. The house was built on 1973 under permit 73-362. There have been additions under permits numbers 85-3743, 87-541 and 2006051824, this fast one was open and it has been completed and finalized with the building department prior to this petition. The intent of this letter is to request a 7 -foot variance from the required 25 -foot rear yard setback to allow a 18 -foot rear yard setback for an existing residence, and proposed enclosure of the lanai to create additional enclosed air conditioned living space. This variance does not include the deck, since the deck elevation is only 16" above grade. 2. There will be no additional site alteration, the area in question is already under roof with a slab in place. Walls will be built within the existing footprint to convert lanai into living space. 3. A) There are no special circumstances, other than the footprint is already existing. B) No special conditions or circumstances, other than the footprint is already existing. C) The literal interpretation cannot be applied since the building is existing and it is already encroaching into the existing setbacks. D) If Variance is granted, it will be the minimum required. No additional encroachment will occur as part of the variance. E) Granting of the variance will not confer any privilege to other land, building, or structures on the same zoning district. F) The areas in question as part of this variance are existing and do not affect the neighborhood nor will be detrimental to the public welfare. The request of the variance is to allow the reduced setbacks to enclose an existing area considered accessory to principal structure. The approval of a reduced setback for this property will not be injurious to the neighborhood. Mr. & Mrs. Hawn have gathered letters from adjacent neighbors supporting their request. Additionally, the back side of Vie property abuts an open space behind apartment buildings therefore the additional living area will still maintain the minimum 10' separation from other structures as typically required by Collier County codes. If variance is granted, it will not impact negatively the neighborhood. G) There is a manmade lake on the property behind the house that ameliorates the actual setback of the house. H) Granting the variance appears to be consistent with county plans, there is no additional encroaching other than the existing footprint of the building. J i I • i klarch 20`h, 2017 Dear Property Owner, Please be advised that 1, Monica Hawn have made a formal application to Collier County for a variance from the requirements of the zoning; regulations ,is they apply to the described property: 412 Marathon Court, Naples Florida. 34112 approximately % mile north of Tamiami Trail East and just east of Lakewood Boulevard In Section 13, Township 50 Soulh. Range 25 Gast It is my intent, to ask the County to allow me to obtain a 18.9 -trot variance from the rear yard setback on the af'irementioned property. In order to provide you an opportunity to become fully aware of our intention, you may call me at 239- 595-1709. Sincerely Moiiica Hawn M Calvert I lawn Rev Liv 'T'rust 0 0 THE LIGON FAMILY TRUST 408 MARATHON CT NAPLES, FL 34112 MC GLAME, JOHN J 404 MARATHON CT NAPLES, FL 34112 ARAGON, ALEJANDRO 400 MARATHON CT NAPLES, FL 34.112 WALIGORA, JOHN P=& ELIZABETH A 417 MARATHON CT NAPLES, FL 34112 HURLEY, JOHN 421 MARATHON CT NAPLES, FL 34112 NIE, JONG 4415 LAKEWOOD BLVD NAPLES, FL 34112 Boca Ciega Village Condominium Association 4100 Corporate Square #166, Naples, FL 34104 POLICELLI, MARK 3058 BOCA CIEGA DR NAPLES, FL 34112 MEJICANOS, MARIO V 3062 BOCA CIEGA DR NAPLES, FL 34112 RON 1 LLC 3066 BOCA CIEGA DR NAPLES, FL 34112 SEPULVEDA� MARGOTH 3070 BOCA CIEGA DR NAPLES, FL 34112 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-72, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did give notice by mail at least 15 days after receipt of letter indicating that the application is sufficient to the following property owners and or condominium and civic associations whose members maj-. be impacted by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a variance or parking exemption. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified. The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change. Per attached letters and or property owner's list, which are hereby made a part of this Affidavit of Compliance. State of Florida County of Collier C7 The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 2 �`� day of 2� 10 by TA Ti �A C i-4. "f , who is „personally known to me or who has produced as identification. (Si l70�!" o o tc t Tz (Notary Seal) 7Printed Name of Notary • MY CMUMM FFOOM % n AGENDA ITEM 4-D Co erCount a y STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION -ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING: APRIL 13, 2017 SUBJECT: BD-PL20I60002607, CASTROGIOVANNI BOAT DOCK EXTENSION PROPERTY APPLICANT/AGENT: Applicant: Joe Castrogiovanni Agent: Patrick Scheele 168 Pago Pago Drive West Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Naples, FL 34113 3584 Exchange Ave Naples, FL 34104 REOUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests a 22 -foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 42 feet to accommodate a boat dock facility with two vessels. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject site is located at Lot 140, Isles of Capri No. 2 subdivision, also described as 168 Pago Pago Drive W. in Section 32, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of the project is to a request a 22 -foot boat dock extension beyond the maximum 20 feet for the subject lot. The proposed boat dock facility is approximately 1,532 square feet of over water structure with two optional boat lifts and boat lift canopies. It will protrude a total of 42 feet from the seawall into a waterway that is approximately 300 feet wide. The total length of shoreline is approximately 70 linear feet. The proposed maximum boat lengths will be 32 feet and 24 feet. There is a single family house on this property that has not yet been issued a Certificate of Occupancy. BD-PL20160002607 Page 1 of 8 Q m C O N CL cc 2 C O t� U O J 0 co N 0 N J L a) .Q E z C O a. uo w� �a 0 a� V Q m C O N CL cc 2 C O t� U O J 0 co N 0 N J L a) .Q E z C O a. SURROUNDING LAND USE _& ZONING: SUBJECT PARCEL: Single-family residence, zoned RSF-4 SURROUNDING: North: Pago Pago Right -of -Way (ROW) and then single-family residence. zoned RSF-4 East: Single-family residence, zoned RSF-4 South: Marlin Bay West: Single-family residence, zoned RSF-4 ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. The subject property has an existing seawall with no mangroves or other shoreline vegetation adjacent to the seawall. A submerged resource survey provided by the applicant found no seagrasses with no significant submerged resources. The provisions of the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan apply to multi -slip dock facilities with ten (10) slips or more and to all commercial marina facilities, and aside from one location within the county, do not apply to individual docks located behind individual residences. Therefore the provisions of the Collier County Manatee Protection Plan do not apply to this facility. BD-PL20160002607 Page 3 of 8 STAFF COMMENTS: The Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny, a dock facility extension request based on certain criteria in LDC Section 5.03.03 H. In order for the HEX to approve this request, the office must find that at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria have been met. Staff has reviewed this petition in accordance with Section 5.03.06 H and recommends the following findings to the HEX: Primary Criteria 1. Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The proposed dock facility will consist of two boat lifts to accommodate two vessels. The proposed boat lifts and vessels will result in two slips which is consistent with the allowed 2 -slip provision. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion not met. The water depth is not an issue. The applicant states that this application is "driven by the type of vessels currently owned by the property owner." 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traf'rc in the channel.) Criterion met. According to the information submitted by the petitioner, the proposed facility will not adversely impact navigation. They further state that the entire waterway is used for navigation. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway BD-PL20160002607 Page 4 of 8 width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) Criterion met. The waterway width, by aerial, is approximately 300 feet and the dock facility will protrude 42 feet into this waterway; this is 14% the waterway width. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. As shown in the submitted applicant drawings, the facility has been designed not interfere with neighboring dock facilities. The dock facility is within the required 15 -foot riparian setbacks. Secondary Criteria 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. It is staff's opinion that the special condition related to the subject pr6p, rty is the relative property shoreline narrowness. The relative property narrowness, combined with the proposed vessel length, directly impacts the proposed dock configuration. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loadinglunloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Criterion met. It is deemed that the proposed boat dock is not of excessive deck area and would allow reasonable, safe access of the vessel. The decking not utilized for the boat slips is designated for Personal Watercrafts (PWC). 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion not met. As indicated on the application, the lengths of the vessels are 32 feet and 24 feet for a combined length of 56 feet. Fifty-six feet exceeds 50 percent BD-PL20160002607 Page 5 of 8 of the subject property's linear waterfront footage of 70 feet; the combined boat lengths are 80 percent of the waterfront length. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The proposed dock facility meets 15 -foot riparian line setbacks. The view shed of neighboring properties will not be impacted. Additionally, the proposed dock facility will be consistent with other neighboring dock facilities in the area. 5. Wbkther seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(I) of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. According to the information submitted by the petitioner, no seagrasses with no significant submerged resources were present. Therefore, there will be no impact to seagrass beds. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) Criterion not applicable. The petitioner's property is a single-family lot with one slip and is not subject to the provisions of the Manatee Protection Plan. Staff analysis indicates that this request meets four of the five primary criteria. Regarding the six secondary criteria, criterion 6 is not applicable, and the request meets four of the remaining five secondary criteria. APPEAL � :OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISIONERS: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the HEX takes action, an aggrieved petitioner, or adversely affected property owner, may appeal such final action to the Board of County Commissioners. Such appeal shall be filed with the Growth Management Department Administrator within 30 days of the Decision by the HEX. In the event that the petition has been approved by the HEX, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30 -day period. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The Office of the County Attorney reviewed this Staff Report on 3/17/17. BD-PL20160002607 Page 6 of 8 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on tai above findings, staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve Petition BD-PL20160002607 subject to the following stipulation: 1. Subject to the approval of building permit PRBD20160621062 and the Certificate of Occupancy of the single family dwelling. ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Application BD-PL20160002607 Page 7 of 8 PREPARED BY: RACHEL BEASLE , PLANNER ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: �� w_ RAYMO V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER ZONIN IVISION APPROVED BY: MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR ZONING DIVISION s--ap- DATE i 17 DATE . 2z - %> DATE BD-PL20160002607 Page 8 of 8 :7 Irl Co ei r County COLDER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collieraov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 Pre -Application Me inn Notes ALJ Petition Type:Aft """�► i i�00t, Date and Time: , • tiM'► Assigned Planner: &%.PA %C �' l Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's: Pro ctatan j Project Name: QQ s a Va a � PL #:_ -Low 0002Vo'1- Property iD #: '52392 `140 00SO Current Zoning: . �••t Project Address: 1 t r Qa A d 7^ A n City: State: L Zip: Applicant: C-0� „jY't? Q ( a V0. vNit. Agent Name: t Phone: Agent/Firm Address: ltk-k l.2►uS CRY: State: Zip: Property Owner: -7- S. :It Var+ � V -t. V -CruA* Please provide the following, if applicable: I. Total Acreage: Z - ii. Proposed # of Residential Units:_ Ili. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: IJ A Iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: 0/ A vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Nj Attachment A �s►+nt Cay COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colller Qv.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 is .Ao�cmmy COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 S(� Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.collieraoy.net Collier County Contact Information: 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 0 • Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Richard Anderson Environmental Specialist 252-2483 richardanderson@colliergqv.net ❑ David AnthonyEnvironmental Review 252-2497 davidanthon @collie ov-net ❑ Summer Ara ue Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownarague@colliergov.net ❑ Steve Baluch, P.E. Transportation Planning 252-2361 StephenBaluch@colllersov.net ❑ Laurie Beard Transportation Pathways 252-5782 Lauriebeard colli ov.net ❑ RachelBeaslq Marcus Berman Planner County Surveyor 252-8202 2S2-6885 rachelbeasley@colliergov.net MarcusBerman@colliergov.net ❑ Madelin Bunster Architectural Review 252-8523 madelinbunster@collie ov.net ❑ Mark Burtchin ROW Permittin 252-5165 markburtchin@colliergov.net ❑ George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543 gegrgecascio@colliergoy.net ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attom 252-8773 heldiashton@colliergov.net ❑ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 2S2-5715 suefaulkner@colli ov.net ❑ Eric Fey, P.E. Site Plans Reviewer 252-2434 erioey@colliergov.net ❑ Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 aulafleishman@colliergov.net ❑ Nancy Gundlech, AICP, PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundiach@colliergov.net ❑ Shar Hi on East Naples Fire District 687-5650 1 shinl!on@cdco.org 0 John Houldsworth Engineering Services 252-5757 johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net ❑ Jodi Hu hes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 jodihughes@colliergov.net 0 Alicia Humphries Site Plans Reviewer/ROW 252-2326 aliciahum hries@collier ov.net ❑ Eric Johnson, AICP,CFM Zoning Services 252-2931 eric ohns @colliergov.net 0 Marde Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 mamiakendall@colliergoy.net Stephen Lenberger Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger@colifergp�y.net ❑ Paulo Martins Utilities 252-4285 paulomartins@colliergoy.net 0 Thomas Mastroberto Fire Safe 252-7348 Thomasmastroberto@colliergov.net ❑ Jack MdCenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 iackmckenna@colliergoy.net ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Prind al Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmdean@collier ov.net ❑ Gilbert Mondvaiz Utility impact Fees 252-4215 glibertmondvaiz@colliergov.net 0 Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam@colliergov.net ❑ Stefanie Nawrocki Planning and Zoning 252-2313 StefanleNawrocki@colliergov.net ❑ Mariam Ocheltree Graphics 252-2315 mariamocheltree@coillergov.net 0 Brand Otero Transit 252-5859 brand otero@colli oy.net 0 • Beasle Rachel Subject: PL20160002607(BDE) Location: CONF ROOM "C" Start: Tue 10111120161:30 PM End: Tue 10/1112016 2:30 PM Recurrence: (none) Meeting Status: Accepted Organizer: Required Attendees: CDS-C AhmadVicky; AlcornChris; Amy Lockhart -Taylor (lockha@collierschools.com); AndersonRichard; AnthonyDavid; ArnoldMichelle; AshtonHeidi; AuclairClaudine; BaluchStephen; Beardl.aurie; BeasleyRachel; BrethauerPaula; BrownAraqueSummer; BrownCraig; BurtchinMark; CascioGeorge; CondominaDanny; CrowleyMichaelle; David Ogilvie; dfey@northcollierfire.com; DumaisMike; FaulknerSue; FeyEric; FielshmanPaula; GewirtzStorm; GosselinLiz; GundlachNancy; HouldsworthJohn; HughesJodi; HumphriesAlicia; JacobLisa; jnageond@stvvmd.gov; JohnsonEric; KendallMarcia; KurtzGerald; LenbergerSteve; LevyMichael; Imartin@sf wnd.gov; LouviereGarrett; MartinezOscar; MastrobertoThomas; McCaughtryMary; McKennaJack; McKuenElly; McLeanMatthew; MoscaMichele; MoxamAnnis; NawrockiStefanie; OrthRichard; PajerCraig; PancakeBill; PattersonAmy; PepinEmily; pjimenez@sfwmd.gov; PochmaraNatalie; ReischlFred; RosenblumBrett; SantabarbaraGino; SawyerMichael; ScottChris; Shar Hingson; ShawinskyPeter; Shawn Hanson; SheaBarbara; SmithDaniel; StoneScott; StrainMark; SuleckiAlexandra; SummersEllen; SweetChad; TempletonMark; VanLengenKris; WalshJonathan; WeeksDavid; Wickham Flannery; WilloughbyChristine; Jeff Rogers • Riannerr RadvefMeasley Flre District= isles bKdortFite ■■r�rrrrr�r�rrrrrrrrr�rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr�rrrr�rrrr�rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr�r�rrrr�r�rrrrrrrrrrrrrr• A Co r County COLDER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT www.colliericov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 D Brandi Pollard utility impact fees 252-6237 1 brandipoilard@colliergov.net Fred Reischl, AICP Zoning Services 252-4211 fredreischl@colliergov.net D Stacy Revay Transportation Pathways 252-5677 stacyrevay@colliergoy.net ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. utility Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenblum@colliergov.net ❑ Michael Sawyer Zoning Services 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net ❑ ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Chris Scott, AICP Comprehensive Planning Planning and Zonin 252-2944 252-2460 corbyschmidt@colliergoy.net chrisscott@colliergov.net ❑ Daniel Smith, AICP Landsca a Review 252-4312 danielsmith@colliergov.net ❑ Ellen Summers Planning and Zoning 252-1032 ElienSummers@colliergov.net Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-8400 scottstone@colliergov.net ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@collierogy.net ❑ Kris Van Len z_i Utility Planning_252-5366 krisvanlengen@colliergoy.net ❑ ion Walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwalsh@colliergov.net ❑ David Weeks, AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net ❑ Christine Willoughby Plannin and Zonin 252-5748 ChristineWilloughby@collier$ov.net Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email 14?t j �i u l� laGl� trGu}ct bOq-7�y'� a�f��,l� T NA is t. Ca Se aLS f -0 iT a KS.Go-. • 0 ttp://www.collierappraiser.com/main_searchlRecorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=52392240005 10/11/201 Page 1 of %oiiier county rroperty mppraiser Property Summary Parcel No. 52392240005 Site Adr. 168 PAGO PAGO OR W Name /Address i . 3 CASTROGIOVANNI REV TRUST 12529 NORTH WELDON RD _ City ROCKFORD State IL Zip 161102 Ma No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated-, 6632 426700 1906032 32 51 26 0' 18 Legal ;ISLES OF CAPRI NO 2 LOT 190 Millatle Area • 91 1ffJ1 ae Rates • *Calculations ---- Sub./Condo 426700 - ISLES OF CAPRI UNIT 2 School Other Total Use d • ; 0 - VACANT RESIDENTIAL 5.245 6.758 12.003 Latest Sales History 2016 Certified Tax Roll (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date 1 Book -Page Amount Land Value $326,542 01/12/15 5115 X900 S 380 000 (+) Improved Value _ $ 0 08/16/13 4257-2252$ 287,500 (¢) Market Value $ 326,542 06/04/99 2554-3102 $175.000 _ _ _. — (_) Assessed Value $ 326,542 12/08/97 2369-709 $ 100,000 06/01/79 81 - 1 $ 0 (—) School Taxable Value $326,542 = 06/01/79 816.1 $ 0 ( ) Taxable Value $ 326,542 U all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll ttp://www.collierappraiser.com/main_searchlRecorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=52392240005 10/11/201 Page 1 of comer %.ounzy rroperzy Appraiser Property Detail Parcel No. 152392240005 Site Adr. 1168 PAGO PAGO DR W _ Name / Address j j CASTROGIOVANNI REV TRUST 12529 NORTH WELDON RD City ROCKFORD State] A Tap 161102 Permits I Tax Yr Issuer Permit # CO Date Tmp CO Final Bldg TyPe 2016 COUNTY 20150722182 SEA WALL Land Building/Extra Features # Calc Code Units # Year Built j Description I Area Adj Area 10 RESIDENTIAL FF 70 10 2015 i SEAWALL 1 70 70 U 0 ttp://www.collierappraisf*r,com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum-52392240005 10/11/201 Page 1of1 i a �m ---..i1,,, t �' ., } �«^R�• a 'T , m.„,'''''''.... ,,' �+ k mo; '• va^,r ,• 7. ,'. .+Gi 4+45,9: � � y_ • , ,,,,, . lett „, „.-, }n . ;,. . .,'5'..: ; t3—1811. I • • http://maps.collie. .Appraiser.com/webmap/output2/Collier_2016_sde03129805580280.jpg 10/11/2016 1 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net �►ms's r„ ��s �'NM�y�• ��}Q��'Ll it-. Co er Coknty 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 The following information is intended to guide the applicant through the application and public hearing process for a Dock Facility Extension or Boathouse Establishment Petition. Prior to submitting the Dock Facility Extension or Boathouse Establishment Petition application, the applicant shall attend a pre -application meeting to determine if a dock facility extension or boathouse establishment is available and to discuss the location, length/protrusion, and configuration of the proposed boat dock facility. The pre -application fee is $500.00 and will be credited toward application fee upon submittal. If the application is not submitted within 9 months of the pre -application meeting the pre -app fee will be forfeited and will not be credited toward the application fee. In order for the application to be processed, all accompanying materials (see attached submittal checklist) shall be completed and submitted with the application. The application fee for a Dock Facility Extension or Boathouse Establishment is $1,500.00, plus $925.00 for required legal advertising. After submission of the completed application packet, accompanied with the required fees, the applicant will receive a response notifying that the petition is being processed. Accompanying that response will be a receipt for the payment and the tracking number (i.e., BDE- PL20120000000) assigned to the petition. This petition tracking number should be noted on all future correspondence regarding the petition. Pursuant to th-- LDC and the Administrative Code, several public notice requirements shall be completed within the required time frames. The Planning and Zoning Department will provide, at the cost of the applicant, legal notification to surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the subject property and newspaper advertisement (required 15 days prior to the advertised Hearing Examiner hearing date). The applicant will be notified by email of the hearing date and will receive a copy of the Staff Report. It is recommended, but not required, that the applicant or the agent attend the Hearing Examiner hearing. Please contact the Growth Management Division at 252-2400 for further assistance completing this application. 6/3/2014 Page 1 of 7 • • C7 • 40 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANP.GEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net .59ter County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 "_VWKFACIUTY EXTENSION 09:8 NT N LDC'Sedtioft'g,(13 06.. F : All�itl<fSt�atlfte°�tfe 'ii1S PE1F(T,ION 15 FOX (check oriel Q aQE1C c SIQN B ATH(Jl1SE ❑ Applicant(s): Joe Castrogiovanni Address: 168 Pago Pago Dr W City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34113 Telephone: Cell: 815.218.9072 Fax: E -Mail Address: joe@giodine.com Name of Agent: Patrick Scheele Firm: Turrell, Hall & Associates, Inc. Address. 3584 Exchange Ave City. Naples state: FL ZIP: 34104 Telephone: 239-643-0166 Cell: 803-609-7944 Fax: 239-643-6632 E -Mail Address: Patrick@THAnaples.com PitE7�lrl;'TY 1,�3CJ�iTIE�N Section/Township/Range: 32/ 51 1/ 26 Property 1. D. Number:. 52392240005 Subdivision: Isles of Capri Unit: 2 Lot: 190 Block: Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 168 Pago Pago Dr W Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: Vacant Residential (RSF-4 & A -ST) BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 6/3/2014 Page 2 of 7 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): The proposed work entails the construction of a new single-family fixed docking facility that is is approximately 1532 square feet of over water structure with two optional boat lifts. The proposed dock will protrude approximately 42 -feet from the seawall into a waterway that is approximately 300 feet wide. I. Waterway Width: 300 ft. Measurement from ❑ plat ❑ survey ❑ visual estimate ❑■ other (specify) aerial 2. Total Property Water Frontage: 70 ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 15&16 ft. Requi=-ed: 15815 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 42 ft. 5. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. 32 ft. 2. 24 ft. 3. ft. 6. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: There are numerous other docking facilities in Marlin Bay, all of which protrude approximately 20' to 45' out into the same waterway. 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? 0.18 Acres 8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes [N-1 No If yes, please provide copies. 6/3/2014 Page 3 of 7 • Zoning Land Use N RSF-4 Right-of-way for Pago Pago Drive West S A -ST Marlin Bay E RSF-4 Lot 189 (Single Family Residential) W I RSF-4 Lot 191 (Single Family Residential) Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing facility, any other pertinent information): The proposed work entails the construction of a new single-family fixed docking facility that is is approximately 1532 square feet of over water structure with two optional boat lifts. The proposed dock will protrude approximately 42 -feet from the seawall into a waterway that is approximately 300 feet wide. I. Waterway Width: 300 ft. Measurement from ❑ plat ❑ survey ❑ visual estimate ❑■ other (specify) aerial 2. Total Property Water Frontage: 70 ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 15&16 ft. Requi=-ed: 15815 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 42 ft. 5. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. 32 ft. 2. 24 ft. 3. ft. 6. List any additional dock facilities in close proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: There are numerous other docking facilities in Marlin Bay, all of which protrude approximately 20' to 45' out into the same waterway. 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? 0.18 Acres 8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes [N-1 No If yes, please provide copies. 6/3/2014 Page 3 of 7 • .5&e -r 14 y • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 L] The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) 2. Whether & not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) 5. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) 6/3/2014 Page 4 of 7 The following criteria, pursuant to LDC section 5.03.06, shall be used as a guide by staff . in determining its recommendation to the Office of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner will utilize the following criteria as a guide in the decision to approve or deny a particular Dock Extension request. In order for the Hearing Examiner to approve the request, it must be determined that at least 4 of the 5 primary criteria, and at least 4 of the 6 secondary criteria, must be met. On separate sheets, please provide a narrative response to the listed criteria and/or questions. 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use, and zoning of the subject property; consideration should be made of property on -unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical, single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Response: The total waterfront length for this property is 70ft. The zoning and upland land use is single family residential which warrants no more than 2 slips per CC -LDC. The current proposed dock design has 2 optional boat slips. The proposed protrusion is consistent with neighboring docks. 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type, and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should show that the water depth is too shallow to allow launch and mooring of the vessel (s) described without an extension.) Response: Water depths at the proposed site do not pose and issue when mooring a vessel of the general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). The need for a BDE is driven by the type of vessels currently owned by the property itv�jner, therefore, this criteria is not met. 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Response: The proposed docking facility will not have any adverse impacts on navigation as it will only protrude 42' from the seawall into the waterway that is approximately 300' wide from MHWL to MHWL. The entire waterway is used for navigation as there are no navigational markers indicating the exact thread of navigation. The proposed docking facility provides adequate space for navigation through this waterway as well as provides sufficient space for a dock to be built across the waterway from the subject property and still provide adequate space for navigation. 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side of the waterway is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) 0 Response: The proposed docking facility protrudes approximately 42' from the MHWL into a waterway that is 300' wide from MHW to MHW. This correlates to approximately 14% protrusion into the waterway and therefore, as proposed, the dock maintains the required percentages. S. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not ib3fere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Response: The proposed dock facility will provide 15' setbacks from the property/riparian lines. The dock design and location has been designed to be located within the required setbacks, provide safe access and not interfere with any future neighboring docking facilities that maybe constructed. • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colllergov.net Co er Cc�lnty 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property ot- waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.061 must be demonstrated.) 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (If applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) M 6/3/2014 Page 5 of 7 • 0 • 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Response: The subject property shorelines is approximately 70 feet, after removing the 15 foot setback from both sides of the property, the buildable shoreline is 40 feet. The applicant has two vessels which will not fit within this buildable shoreline without perpendicular mooring. This along results in a 42 foot protrusion from the seawall. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe, access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Response: The proposed dock facility was designed to allow safe ingress/egress for two vessels and provide a storage area for other recreational vessels while minimizing decking as much as possible. The design is well within 25% width of waterway, therefore, it allows safe navigation of Marlin Bay. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Response: The proposed dock facility has been designed to moor two vessels, one 32 foot and one 24 foot vessel, a combination of 56 feet. The combined length is greater than 50%, therefore, this criteria is not met. 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring waterfront property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of either property owner.) Response: The proposed dock facility is one of the few lots on the bay without a docking facility. The proposed dock has been designed within the designated setback area. The proposed docking facility design is consistent with others on this waterway, and will not affect neighboring properties view of the waterway. 5. Whether or not seagrass beds are located within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are p -esent, compliance with LDC subsection 5.03.061 must be demonstrated.) Response: There are no seagrass beds present on the property nor the neighboring properties within 200' of the existing dock structure. 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of LDC subsection 5.03.06 E.11. (if applicable, compliance with subsection 5.03.06.E.11 must be demonstrated.) Response: The proposed work is a single-family dock facility and therefore not subject to Manatee Protection Requirements. COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net i Co er ounty +.�.C." 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre y -Applii�`ti rh`! 4 �B"�rrtIi+�ckfl� mar use Ch�pel3 B.ilf Ede Atlmiltfto c>d� UIIIC V1 OVIAIGaUVII 5ut7rn1IIa1. HL ilme OT SUDMIttal, the cnecklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT COPIES REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 6 Signed and Sealed Survey Chart of Site Waterway Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed 6 facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustrati :7,n of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization, signed and notarized 1 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Electronic copy of all required documents *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials 1 EJ El to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 6/3/2014 Page 6 of 7 • 0 • -59 C�M■p- � ou COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 28W NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colgargm.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: FEE REQUIREMENTS: ❑ Boat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 ❑ Esthnated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.00 ❑ An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information Indicated on this checklist Is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal Information may result In the delay of processing this petition. Signature o Petitioner or Agent Date ,I 6/3/2014 Page 7 of 7 ck-A t W V7 CL. - N QRS ,. ", . I ct r. G U . r AII C ..41* ^..rn �, 3' rt Lra ER's` `a ar1A. 1:-"''''''''-'"- -„5 ' .!• ;• R r, 0 gg } ; 'le '� r'4,ro P" Y ` �- ° dao Z i$ y „,,f-''-:,-;.:,,' 9 d,4. _ ,...,-*,,,,,::„ 0 u `= wW .Yi. , ,. I,- b r„ bN h�., �, U a d z _ l— c)¢ a..� a Po - s Wa G Q 8 D� Nw a O j a Z Z W• • '� N 0 iiii w Z a.• , • s , ai o vzi 0 ® w p� roc; n/ : t w w w ,,.,V- �j, IL ¢ zcc 0 _ In 4tr Q cn N co �/J o z? z� w ~ v,d� ¢ z w rl ° V `:18LI.' 0W OF / I ��Z Ww0 ~Z m ILI .�Uoi i , t' `A- tn.” V .'� v v v CJ .a �, + off/ Wayµgµ�1Z 1111:.,.,.,,,8.-, !id 0y �y..�. C C f0 s O 'ii';ce� C = ry te ' � .i IIA:��r oo 2� n a41r. w pp N� I J GULY Q cL Z W DO toQ. Q. t M p:\1616-ces4o0ioranni dock\CAO\PERM$T-COUNTY11646 CASTROGIOVANNI-BDE.dwg LOCATION 2/10/2017 ` , :`N m ., :. , ; N W. .St.. 14. - 1041 a w Ih} IIi"' ..i „,'. , .„ ..IttligN Z Ce 4)111t4o Oh N Y a / >- m U Z 0 eC 2 0 1 \ Zo . Z — :. E I \ . •-- • .. Qo - TS: : (.9 --1 Q w '11 .::!', Xn wa Zcb J NW toz a QJ E 0 wb0 N N ° c oa. M c ctEdV c> 7 O aai d c z v c �W `nZZ o t-E--' .±G >< AA E i] 01616 castrowovanni dock1CAO1PERMIT-COUNTVI I W 8 CASTROGIOVANNI-BOE.dwq POEDMI CON 2/10/2017 L LOUOI/Z 1V1897L/OiOd 1bMP30S-INNVAOIOOdLSVO 91-9IVUN1100-131113d10V0\400p!Wa^o1 O464"9I9ll:d 9 \-fi/ D R Z m N A VJ C17�j V c�, G y ..--. /, O M k t 0* r • y c-) • /' 00 13 13 A 0 I— CT aO w7.� al nm m C/� Lam VA y Teo > E 400. z N N 00 D > O fri.‘44, - � �7rUJLr *�Z,wax `�'Iir ti lel" IA, c* T c, ,,,0:1'k V/ �l:Y I h•- i '# €, ID 0 I ' X 0 . 0 yy -d @ ,ars^" s)&01,0'4,"'" � a'' � r- 7.3 _ ill 4110 : 0 0 I TI LI S= , t 5, 0 o v ��'l' 0 Z � o � Z -§4 ' 4' - _ 1 1 ;. m co m Q S m 73 Or c ::r-i C '''''41 4?--i''.44 ' 4.;"'''.'' 'f* — 1 ': '4:4,1 11114k r M X * ,.37„..% _,, r-,' ;.lkt ter pn"4,rtta, ,,"t!' .., gilig g .'.._-.A.:.•.--%, '',`,:‘, -,1:-LA 1.." ilkA .N A N ' i 1 *. n g.-1. k t'Vti iiii*I—° ic:,) 't, 14,A1 i 1 1 0 co 13 < o ®�®®fie 3-flmi 1 D OHilL -� z oI'h S; i►. 4 If .76 !Mai 0 ° 61 th II • ii, , o ° ov/o 0 o . T 4gOm, °4 IT / O m '/ p, [t0U012 AHlF1®i[91I8 W+P 308-INNVA0100M1SV39191UapfYi�-LIWi13d10V�la�P!w�^a�A��9Y91Hd \.,-,09/ 4� 1 1'� pirrn �� A'4, 'm9 I 3 ....0::::, - - ' k...,,v4:_, .,: . �' 4' , { �. rc , F 'u f., n , • C PuF d� � ~+ 4ftI`F4 f h`k akt D appp /Af ry,P .-.� a'!' • 14.P 1P4,'‘df D , 415 , Zw ,1 Nti 0 '''$‘141:"'-:'''':''':'‘'''..:'14'46,1:31'.14''''''' '''-;71:1::''rx n syn �m2n )'''-'°'`:'r Sys ,`F {��n t 41 Z yd _. *.' '1: ' 1:'',1*:**- N s t '! OSx., aaaa®5 N • +, t-1 iilliiiii7 It, L,".4 7 ' .. IIuI�� s G " m xrt; 4- 4',,:.' °s: AAS L IOL/Ol2 2dt�/DBS d^tP'300'INNVAOIOOi11StlO 9f9lU1Nf1Oo-1DDR' d\(mV '°P!wenO!nOAse.gf9��A 0 Q. I I W I I i/ z O p r I v -nm _< _1 0 T 1--- — /---- 1-- 1 5. �x g a A Iw I Q a� ID ID 12 1.� g�CD ' Q � 3• I6 I6 ] *DO i D N O O U) c '"1 m � + p � 7 ry 0 W � -0 A I I o 0 O `. V 1 O ] ca gym , r0 ] G) �' � ]' K It • I i / mG L v U> ° Z I z 1 oI I I ( F �: II I ] oT pi ' 1 oo ;� ' ] o . . . . s� I ] 0 m 51 0a o M m }• 0 m • D CZ r T ,-1.4 LloV01(L(aPq),714:s eio a I"P'3OR-INNNAOIOOtl1SV'J910916UN(IO0-1JWN3dKIVOVPOP Wucw0bo9$Ua91.911:d F •" r ",,Ns ; r . 1 i ; . i .__.„1", . x ' 221 ., 01 -'! $ 'L- w /yrrr i — to S z Fp i �iy �� T j--26 .r� � I � cq �TM 7 1 i�' s S'4 < �1 f +' I 7c ` sil �I, -..1""; t ':-.1 tl I .),-...t,1 cmc .�y ` a" L'' 11 ---f ' ' : x ----,--- _ ..,,, - ', ,,, ,, - ,_,.....„.....„--„,..rr, .. ,. ;{ ... - ,_, )=. o lif; ',-, 1 ,,,,f ...w...,w,. ... Z 0 `� x" —27' P. • ,..; .- , 7 ' \/*1 1.,,v _ , ‘,„,...,,ti.A.„,...„,„, ..,, , .,„,, , „,._,„,.,„ • L _ I , L. `'- T� RI Z1 O W.. f 1IP3II1 Y "it'ellk' i:7;',-,2 ''l Vr- ii fid 4 ! . V5c"' 2U° ��� t i 5111E12 N IUIA' 23 ?,,,,:: II ,:,1,,,,,, , . ,, ,, A� L-k 7B'If'�+UtiiN.ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliersov.net (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 ASS CC Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit In person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form mus(_be signed by Addressina oersonnel odor to ore-aovlication_meetina.abase allow 3 days fq procasslnq. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED.Forms older than 8 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE(Indicate type below,complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL(Blasting Permit) 0 SDP(Site Development Plan) ❑s BD(Boat Dock Extension) 0 SDPA(SDP Amendment) ❑ CamivaVCira v Permit 0 SDPI(Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU(Conditico56il Use) ❑ SIP(Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP(Excavation Permit) [] SIPI(Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP(Final Plat 0 SNR(Street Name Change) ❑ LLA(Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC(Street Name Change—Unplatted) ❑ PNC(Project Name Change) ❑ TDR(Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL(Plans&Plat Review) 0 VA(Variance) 0 PSP(Preliminary Subdivision Plat) 0 VRP(Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone 0 VRSFP(Vegetation Removal&Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ(Standard Rezone) 0 OTHER • LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties(copy of lengthy description maybe attached) Isles of Capri No 2 Lot 190 532 T51 R26 FOLIO(Property ID)NUMBER(s)of above(attach to,or associate with,legal description if more then one) 52392240005 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES(as applicable,if already assigned) 168 Pago Pago Dr W • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY(copy -needed only for unpiatted properties) CURRENT PROa T NAME(If applicable) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME(If applicable) Castrogiovanni Dock PROPOSED STREET NAMES(if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER(for existing projects/sites only) SDP or AR or PL# 11) 1BY County iCOLUER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MARIAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.coillertto``.net (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 Project or development names proposed for,or already appearing In,condominium documents(if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: ❑Q Email ❑ Fax 0 Personally picked up Applicant Name: Turrell, Hall &Associates Phone: 2396430166 Email/Fax:Patrick@THAnaples.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and,is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number X2392240005 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: ViritDate: 9/28/2016 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE • UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Location Map II 1 ''''''''N , ,. ; , fh� dgti^15 li us ltlltty . ., 4 las twat PacP R ',44 44 44,4 fir.. a'`4s $ '" 11'1' 9 E al • • a /' °�— 4110 MILD STREET L UN C S 224BEARING 808'E 30.00' \ i�d�'$+ 0-44 L 1 R3 S 2519'00.E 30.00' N. Q i- L 1 F} S 25D7'17'E 29.69' c7, q�.,d + 0/Sg s p���j �:, 1040 7, vs Art •Talk ,5. Ai �•°; N.5' � cpm 1 ..►•: .5e, ‘.0 r.04 I 4° �s°� lea •c°.* i.. . m sst ' 1 k t 45 t. t Grid North 46.2,:•=6\ 1" = 30' �\ 14'0 • S3,'0''''' /*:.( M $1 CERTIFIED TO: ANDREW HUNTER HOMES,LLC J. J. CASTROGIOVANNI REVOKABLE TRUST I PARCEL DESCRIPTION: LOT 190, ISLES OF CAPRI NO. 2, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 46, OF I THE PUBUC RECORDS OF COLDER COUNTY, FLORIDA. WO*16-0308 DRAWN BY:JSBS LEGENEt NORTH AMERICAN TE& ELEVATIONS ,��w OPYSET '�DATUM 7DI ENSU ARE OUND UPI FEE FAN DECIMALS . E.. DATION AND ..NO ID--RAACIAL OL =to t UPE STRUCTURES WERE NOT FF1D LOCATED OR SHOMN. 3 ONLY INTERIOR M'ROVE ENTS SHOW WERE LOCATED. 1 -REOCIRD RRMX PC ppE%IAN IT 00117ROL PONT 4)PARCEL WAS SURVEYED FROM INFORMATION FURNISHED • GR -HAAD�53-f.EAST ZONE)ACOM PP PROFESSIONAL SINEYOR 5)POLE P CEL UESTHE FLOOD ZONE AE 6. FEET C t MAPPER 12071°0626H DATED: 06 6 2012 C TTV BCIX PT PONT CF TANGENCY 6)PARCEL S18.ECT TO EAg1ENTS EST IONS go CAPE ENp�10 DEPT. ROWPE *. TY EASFIF74T RESERVATIONS AND RIGHTS-OF- AY OF RE GF Cy1AN tJ h SD STORM WAY 7)ELEVATIONS ARE NAVD 1986 BASED ON COL 1P 27, OM CONCRETE SEP STOAPPRO)ORAN 1.Ol:ATICt!OF 6)NO METLA2OS OR JURISDICTION USES MERE LOCATED. cp CONCRETE PAD SEF,11CdT Ng THE LIND DDUUE DRAINAGE A .1 EASEIFI/TLOP R1pipDCM STS IT NOT CEIS MAP CF SURVEY RTIFICATION,OF F� Ot p,OR A1fMT5-�lT�,FREEDOM OF ' F FENCE� CCOf6CF �T SNrT SET LBL k TNI WAY. ADDITWN5 at DLE�T1ONS PDTHE SURT.EY MAP BY OTHERS FEL FOUND OINCREIE MONUMENT SP SCRED ED PORCH THAN THE SN,Y4WG PARTY OR PARIES IS PROHIBITED FF 1149ED'1.012 ELEVAIOI SW SEAWALL WITHOUT WRMTIFT! CONSENT OF THE ,`Il l F I ITN4 FR FOUND RC I'101) TB TOP BANK SWING PARTY OR PARTF3. 11115 i RI FOUND M4 101 TEMPORARY BENOII HL MAP OF SURVEY IS NOT VAUD ,,••,..._:(g/-164/ �. FN&T FOLIO HAL 2 TAB TEL TELEPHONE BOX *MOU T T1£SIGNATURE AND THE .` 5,..• .,�ej'':. GF auY GFiWYi EIEVAILOFI lE UTA EASEIiE]!T ORIGINAL RNS D SEAL CF ITE : •:5E Nu -p H1D FIRE HYDRANT USC/0-UNITED STATES COAST& MAPPER. ABSTRACT NOTFLORIDA UCENSED REVELLED �,LlJ1 LB LICENSED BUSINESS GEODETIC SURYEY 0 6* Mt �R WV - AALI�LWA�V VEYOR YM 4.WATER LVE _ LS 55f33 HAD NORTH AMMAN DATUM 01 K.K.15UKN ,UKVI;Y_NCI,INC,. Lt5 6133 sTATEOI Iir MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY �._gl,`FL...I ti'.` F7 _�. 4w SZIRVe`_ ,:o W rp_ 0m2O A)() oe7 a 2016 P�� John S. Burns. Sr. 9S.M-LS/5583 E//eSU V� \�‘ 00M I 6* T 1 or R. K.Burns Surveying. Inc.Licensed Survey Busin KIM AXE i91Wl IOCVG_,V1 .7 OOZ '[L Manigo! soil�i uoNtjwwoo AW . iMWlu W pals %oq#Y AM*" Iva$1Vlalid0 N24vW AttlVfl W9111. ollgnd AMON JO otrgeuB �vaalaexts -Uopommpl se Noommusp! Jo oft asva Jr 7 V435a-peonpoid se4 to ow o; uMoug ApeuONW el 04M ss '(uoll MWB Jo 41so Bujpptoid uowod to eweu) Aq (epap)�' se,, uo ow ajojaq pegllosgns pus (peuugp Jo) of WOMB sono wow sul BupBaio[ eu a3moo d0 ,uNnoo YUMC t 1:ro ruvis mea et,�e $ C>'z �Ojel"Pf u 4; INA Pus uogez}to4lnd;o 71AsPWN BUIOSWo; e4O peas envy I eu un uOW Pug `dills m4md �W 'Oimdm 'lenple put "B•e 'OWMMo IOIAwj � ! +Igel►dWdde OW can SOTS slueagdds O+II Oumuelep guy leouvW tpae u/ . ,ee>srul as. apmM Orli pue eweu a eam4 et/l Opnlm4 psnw hetp ustp '/arid a sl p sopdds eyl Jl . '-*gosulred peweu By) 10.j aped MMOB. OW 89 PGAMOPI sq pus u0la lanes reupod twoueB erp uOyl I ftweWed pallwq a sl luso#We ow JI • •diyaraulred Oyl Jo psyOq uo &Oo uso.reulred a 4►ldfi ueyl 'Ogsreupud a al luegydde etpll . . isqumpV Bu&uoN. a owedWoo oW Aq pO+do eq pinoys quamnaop ey? ueyl '(0 7) Auedwoo pOl/wn m to -7-7) Ausdumo loge 7 Pokwn a q lusoydde Ow m • •said A.to •seed dw 9q)Aq pel»Oexe Xpnan q M uatp 'mWitiodw a al lue*dde Oyl U . :sO7ON. •enoge Z 48nl41 1 BuIMml u 8141 Bulpleft amijew �tus ul anpquosejdaa �twpno se toe oy u u 4 ?wo4lne Yam 'o PUB suoppPuoo 0U1 M PO4M PaP1Ap�gns Joh 4e a4�q p 1m A doidEgset ply 'P�entwo 'PeLOJsue4 eq pjM itliedad e41 •y M pus !uopleopdde 914146=41 spew;senbat a41 Bugenpue pus B o8paAul to asodind etp aoj smo4 Buppom leuilou Bupnp 4admd e4; undo jalua o; Hunoo xgpoo;o l!W$ eq pezpo4lne eAs4 I -£ 'W&4 Pus pauo4 am uopgWe s141 10 1md a spew pue ojsm4 pe4=lle Aa11ew IGeluewelddns Aetpo so UMP '884%e48 Aue pus uopeolldde 8141 ul suollsenb etp o1 s "Un IV -Z 4l 411M eouep mon ul A�000 a% Aq POAoidde u 'opo'J ojnmjuawdeneo PUe� a49 pus uollO bdd%e QJ LG �Iue to oses a se 4edald peouejepax ail uo suOROMW pue slueuetlm asodu4 o; pus popenbei (sNenoJdde ay; moose o; A90UPU Ifni eAe41 3 gstp PUBE3mseqwnd wegUOO=1t jjdds �AauMO (suo esoaP) O4} we I IwA %Roo Jepun LwW do Aam9 '(elgeol J1 'Auedu=) — to p"qugIdde im1 fo l!'eAl3) se'(owMid) ,yrs") — 'I doWlil14d f{ tQ .94m—+ or Wsimemm NOIJJJ.3d HOA Nouvammunv ao imvoizi" 1suge8e ecus& a 'JOASWuloyM swaied lie {o swtep Injmal eyl y1 PUG q!M Pue PUB/ atll 01 a/M aqj iutwsM Apnl Xgway coop joauatO ey, ONV •pgaisautoq Magi of snonlilaoo ,tuadoid 8113 s[ tou 'Aug 3t pit amtoutuc s,toiuea .to asnods s�joiumS atp '.Ioluva 2113 3o Peaisaumq 8113 'uaag Jaea it set; aou 'Mou iou st upmq Pagl=P dilados'.ags ul to Buleuo/eq owagl saousualuldde pug ju&ueu6u1ulel�edde eclM�tug pwaq 'quaulaual pa g1lM isq)o o1 *JBAaol eldW aal ul auras eq1 'O7OH QL ONV 3A VH Ol e19RAod pus ww pA lou afs galgat •areal wanbsegns Pus 9102 rssA egl jqf "M Pug P» 10 8iusummes pug suopaussau 'suopappw of I*2igns y"e Uo1PJQoo rs/110310 :proH 10 008 Ig d DPw SO 1oW947 ;old ro Bulpuoaas 'Z • _ s010 -98181 '061;07 � � 0i "nPl� al 7 teq pue Buplj 'ejenlls 'pull paguasep 1 olio! ay1 a+ e e s, pue 'aaluev0 p!es ayl 01 Pl0qg�e'ue94M diaa 047 'aaluvio s Ps4 PIa pue POW raylo pug 'S?1V770O N31 to wns a elaPlsuoo ao er0 ayl AD '1.113SS3N11M 19 71 `promooM 'PJ uOplom 41+0N BOO -sl ssarppe avo Pod asoyM Y I)ELO'6s9 'S'3 ca umnsmd 'ut=q I»gtmsoP Pus lapunalaq pa.fwnuoa aiaisa leaf 8113 ut >sa»iut letoyauaq Pw Idol aqi qoq ,10 asodstp pus aBeultu aslwuagio jo 'sagtunoua 5taeuoo %seal alas 'dim 'lalsM 'a dUom 'auasuw 'iaaiold of ,ti1logms pus lamod Itn3 y . 'pelWW pus popu8ws 09 'on; '8 r8gruaAON POMP ;SM110 uollsrelaaa elgsaona?! IUMA015046'10 %' gdosor ow 10 Bwm.L 'luusmAwpo0 r gdasor Pue WOUNVUS '09#90 AD 'PJOIIIW ' PU I -90d uolso8 969 '61 SSOJAPe eaylo Isodasa Ar Pus pusgsng 'tauilospiq 'V qwoga0 pus laMy"019 7N Q1&JV A9 (Me jo �iep � slyl epees amwepul slyl [%_v_vl7yuAmvju 00000'09 S NOUV8301SNOO 00.009109£f SNW OS'8Ts D3v' 09-099 ZS OL'saw vanois uNnm aarnoo 'lanoa linDusD Stu. do Mal: Xooae •3 INOrM Z S3SVd W S£-6 STOZ/8Z/T 030VOD31 006Z Sd STIS 710 696LLOS XISNI 11 • • • �ou�►�ft7 ' y �eW 7/ a1 j-11 bj dO ALNn0O )-t-2aVuOV d031V1S sseumm z -ON sssumm l0 sunleu8ls 10 OWN l -ON.899044i 10 amM48 76'1'YIKI� - 40 sauesard ow ul pwa^llep Pug peleas 'peAs WOO M &AD" Ift lgeA pug Agp ew lgas pug puay sAlua g les olunarey sail jaiugJ 'd03URW a 3N1W NI ZpZefiDd peep lwamm 844 T06Z -'w SITS ao •as 1919-W&W sst►E NAWd VLON Oam = smaw 409 Avg M Yd *NWb7 9 %ltd Vm4VOq 1 2m -jc wrismm N )x puad�rd wwnu0sul alt Dimmad BRION .-Bwoxo uolsslwum ally ,' .*,.• -- f?' • �- -Vgnd gPN ri • i �r Ica pus ume0 (wept se ua :�� peluassud engy Jo out of uMow! �leua�s�-ed aJe 01/M '8�i1M 17u8 PUefjslll/ 'J8U)/J®Old '1V !! OQoQ PLB �ettX�01J !N �tq �/ OZ !0 A(gp slw aw ar o sero ,XMWA49UI 6uPZWGi UqL r �ou�►�ft7 ' y �eW 7/ a1 j-11 bj dO ALNn0O )-t-2aVuOV d031V1S sseumm z -ON sssumm l0 sunleu8ls 10 OWN l -ON.899044i 10 amM48 76'1'YIKI� - 40 sauesard ow ul pwa^llep Pug peleas 'peAs WOO M &AD" Ift lgeA pug Agp ew lgas pug puay sAlua g les olunarey sail jaiugJ 'd03URW a 3N1W NI ZpZefiDd peep lwamm 844 T06Z -'w SITS ao •as 000E -66£Z£ ld 'eassegellel 'O -OLE woos 'pM8 Moo piewn4S SSSZ 'jawnl MuelO 'oo 00tlz-zsz-6£z bOltri: epuold 'saldeN -JO 804s9S10H •N 0092 ;uawpeda4 luewa6euelM ylnnaO "Ipl»¢ ,w"& P*W09 " a 'Alejeouig •1au•A06j9ipoo@n unnag6!ejo A 9bZZ-ZSZ-(6EZ) :auOgd le aw PEWOO of a9J1 1991 aseeld 'jauew s!4l 6uipie6aj suoilsonb Aue ane4 noA11 •i!uued 6u!pl!nq f4uno0 a 10 souenssi of loud paluesaid eq llegs slaau!6u310 sdjoO ALLUV •S•O 941 pue uogoalad leluawua!Au310 luawliedad epuold 9ql wO4 uoildwaxa 10 sJaual Jo sl!wJad •Z *Aliedoid 941 wou panowai eq Ile4s '001 ZO.90.6 uois!A!O ul pauyap se 'uo!lela6aA O!loxe lie (00) Aouedn000 to aleog4jeo a to eouenssi 01 Loud :Aldde llegs suogelndgs 6uimollol a41 liuuad s!41 Aq pezuoglne suoileial!e aps segquep! ueld eps pegoeue 941 •(041) apo0 luawdolanad puel fi4uno0 J91110O a4110 a•LO•£TZ pue yL•Z0•y uoiloag of luensmd panoidde Alangegsiuiwpe uaaq se4 fi4jadoid peoumpi anoge a41 jo11!uuad 1u9wdolanap (1S) lueugeeil lepeds a jol;senbei mol\ 910Z19Z21 aauensq llwiad JOA PGA01* Pue peM"8 aea0 900017ZZ6£Z9 # al Aijadad LECE0009LOZld'oN 3!uUad luauueaJl le!oodS AN z06 69 ll 'OHOd>10O21 ON NOa13M H1NON 6Z9U 1S(12LL A321 INNVAOIJO211st10 f f 9lOZ '9Z jagweoa0 0 � 0 POlh£'IA `S3zddN $ HIS `3aN3AV aDNIVH3XH bSS£ JNI `Sa LVIjossv V 'I-IV]g `'I'IMMJL :All Q9H VdaUd 9TOZ xago.LaO AanxnS 93xnoSaH aafMaNE IS £IIff JA `s:IzavN is3A,t 3AIHQ 09VJ 09VJ 891 0 x30Q iuNVA0190xisV3 bio I a8nd '(HZL iapoW uluunD) SdJ Plagpunq n VIA slltull palnaullop Iauuosaad •oul `salletoossd ag IInH `IlaunjL • •poA.iasgo saamosa.i pAiotugns XUB jo slltull olnurtxoiddn aqI palleaullap pun `a2n1ano3 3o % agl palleuzllsa `ails aqI it, saoanosaa pa�aautgns paglluapt Iauuosaad •oul `salleloossd V 11nH `llaunj •saoanosaa pa2aauzgns Mule jo uollnool ail paluautnoop pun lvlad4003 IoafoA pasodoad agl uigllm p013311OUS pun IlsiA alts le palonpuoo lauuosaad -ouj `salletoossV V pnH `llama j •moloq paztaleututns si ails aqI it, p4)uuo3aad 3laom 3o adoos ImauaS aq L •poq sslea2nas o2anl n 3o lred an Xagl 3l ao ozls ui pleats anspaq ssna2leas ag131 poutuualap oq of spoau Ii Bon Ioafoad aqI ulgllm Iuasaad On sassnaSnas 3l sloledutt Mule aztuttutut of aapao ut sloop posodoad aqI Sulan2guoo3a ul isissn pinom os 3l pun saoanosaa pa2aautgns Sullslxa Xuu Iondutl pinom Ioofoad pasodoad og13! ouiuualap dlaq of uollleuuojul 11nUatuu011nu0 allsuo papiAoad Xanans aqj •leaale loafoad agl 3o Ioa3-OOZ ulgltm ao loafoad Sloop pasodoad aqI jo sllutll aqI utillm soomosaa pzSioutgns Bullslxa ,Cole alleool pun �3lluapl of slem XaAmS ooanosag pa2aautgnS ag13o anloofgo aq lZ 21A113argo 0'Z •Xanans aqI jo allep ail uo (,8•Z) 'w -d 9Z:£ Ile paaan000 aPII q2iq Pun Q'0) WV 80:6 In paaan000 app mo -1 •3oi8 sum aanlnaadwal aalnm OU •,Canans aql aoJ suotltpuoo InluauzuoatAua POOR apinoad of padlaq oslle galgm uquo Ajanlllelaa aaam �Cnp sigl uo suolilpuoo aalnm a3le3anS •laa3 b -Z atom paSum Ingl ,ilrllglslA aallemaapun pooS ut pallnsaa sat)ls alealo XClland pule spulm Isleaglaou Ig2►t gltm OR ad 'Y�i'd 0£:6 Ile 9IOZ `£ aagolo0 uo palonpuoo srm S2IS aqI ao3 IlslA plag aqZ 's:ipluoq palleloossle (Z) OAU ►illm sloop XIltunj-al8uis n Sutlonalsuoo pun Sutu2tsap jo sistsuoo Ioafoad posodoad aqj •Ioafoad pasodoad aqI of spanSaa ul `saamatnaa X3ua2le aqI pun saaumo aqI gloq of aoun}slssn matnaa pun Suluuleld apiAoad 111m Xamns sigl •Xllltole•} Sui loop posodoad aqI aol (S' ,CananS ooanoso-d paSaautgnS le apinoad of polonaluoo sum •oul `salnloossd a8 IInH `IIaijn.L •saouaplsaa Xllutle3 alSuis annq Islea pun IsaM ail of Xuadoad SuyoggSlau aqj •oullaaogs 1[lemn9s alaaouoo Bullslxa un gltm aouaptsaa Xj!wn3-al2uls n Xq paldn000 Xlluauno st Klaadoad aqI 3o uollaod punldn oq.L 'isng 9Z aSung pun `glnoS Ig dlgsumo L `Z£ uolloaS ulgllm IsaM anlaQ ogled 029d Jo glnos Isnf ladno 3o alsl uo palnool sl klaadoad aq.L '9000bZZ6£Z5 aaqutnN looaled sn XjunoD .tallloo Xq pagtluopl si pun "I3 `ladled 3o salsl uo IsaM aAU(I oSnd 02nd 891 In palnool sl loofoad sloop luulenol2oalsn0 aq j N10113(1ao-dIKI 0' 1 910ZU990130 AHAWaS 90xnos31d aaoaat 9f1S ?IOOQ INNVAOIJOH LSVZ) * I 0 b 3o Z And I algal ss nmolaq paptAoad si pun paandaid uaaq snq saioads asaql jo Isll u pun Xanans aqI Suianp saioods gsg snoaawnu aaanm panaasgo osld palonalsuoo Xlluooaa sutaq Ilu muds oql of anp aoasos alarm kalI aaAanmoq `I[snmuas gullstxa agI uo palsool salosuatq wo m aaaq jL •sllals SuiAil ou aaanm aaagl aananmoq `Haan Xanans aqi uigl!nm slagap aalsXo paaalltos am m aaatLL •Haan paKanans aailua aqI inogSnoagl puno3 aaanm salnalsgns asogl• •siagap Ilags ip! m qloq Haan aadaap aqI uI lno puno3 alualsgns �onu.1 Itis t of Ilis puss u st stair paXomns aqI uiglinm puno3 olualsgns aly S.L-IfIS3j 0'b •Itglgxa pagoslls aqI uo unmogs am sSuipug agjL •spaq sstaSsas aqI ao3 aSsaanoo palscuilsa aSsaans un olui pol!dwoo aaanm sllnsaa ItnpiAlpui aqI pus spaq sswSuas panaasgo ulgllnm auop aaanm aluapsnb aqI 3o sluawaosld wopus-1 -alis uo posn ssnm algsaanseaw aaow salswtlsa aBsaanoo ON= of suoilaas oluf ua)loaq aaqunj `Iuuapunb aasnbs aalaw jfsq d •�H ZL lapoW utuLmD) SdJ plagpuuq VIA paUuguoo uagl pun ologd luuat ut uo paluaullap stem uo►iuool alswtxoaddn aiagl pus `pagpuunb ssnm aftaanoo jo Iuawalnwixoaddt, aqI `paudtBologd • aaanm saoanosaa pagaawgns palsooZ uaat pa,(anans aallua oql lnoonoall" Iuawdinbo lo3laous Buisn alis all paganans •oul `salsloossd ag IIuH `llomnl woa3 slslgolocq O'MJL •panaasgo saoanosaa Sur Suiltool ui palsissu goignm `solid Sloop ss qons `saa3lasw aouaaajaa algtg►Iuap► ,(lista 2uipinoad sloop 2ulaogg2lau 2ulism aql of anp Ana XIPAilnlaa sum tact loafoad pasodoad a p RuiXananS •Xliltot3 2unloop aqI jo uotsnaload pasodoad all lstd Ino put tact Ioafoad aallua aqI 2ullwlaous Xq palunlsna stns tans p;)XoAans oq j sSu►pug llg gdsaSologd put IuauanaoQ • aBuaan003o luawad aluwixoaddt auluualap put, `saoanosaa paRiowgns 3o sliwil aluool Sdf) salis Ious AllsotsXgd• tact Xanans jo (gdiaaologd Ittaat Jo MWA3-de ,�laadoad loofgns alI oI )uaosfps ao mou polaldwoo s,(anans Islad pus slsiaas Issd 3o nmalAaZle :papnloul ,fanans sill aoj sluauodwoo aqI •Iu[adlooj sloop pasodoad aqI Issd Ino puma pus outlaaogs Xpadoad aallua all aanoo oI S -HS agl io XBOlopoglaw all pouSisap Sllsuopualul slsiSololq •oul `saluioossd w lluH `Ilaaan L A9O10aOH13W 0T 91 OZ xaeoloo A9AUnS ammosax Dgort Ens X300 INNVAOI9OH LSVJ v 3o £ aSud •ails slip it, poloodxa lou on saoanosaa pagaawgns of slopdwt antluSON 'SUTA[ lou SL'm aeaas o sta a a aluals ns a l uo alluw aA1as o sum ovS u . I P 9 .9PlIgS' 9 q P P 9 I umoaq aulauW •asauds aaam ,Carp aanamoq `Ilumuas Sutls[xa aql uo SulmoaS paA.iasgo aaam solouuaug •sSulpug maj paplall( alls oql it, (mins aoanosaa paSaawgns aqZ suoisnzan[oa 0'S •lslsaad puu llnaoaa o; ACltutlus aaow puu alualsgns aalpuns u aatnbaa XlluaauoS sassuaSuaS •olualsgns atp jo aanluu asool aql sr Ilam su puuo apuw-uuw aql uttplm Xlllunb aalum llutano otp of anp Alqll lsow sl saoanosaa poSaawgns jo Noel oqj •slods ul olualsgns aql Uo paaa,Cul ouSlu umoaq outauw atuos sum aaagl -saoanosaa paSaawgns luuog►uSls aAuq lou pip lugl olualsgns llls puns aql pollglgxo uaau Aanans oqj jo XlpofuW snsbuog maldotgyg ,fug asoumoo lllryaM noyauv mODUlw solo sllarutoapun sndwo4uaj NOOUS snlvgdao p9nM lallnW podlalS snlnydaoojngoid snS.msoya.rd puagsdaogS mast. snunf;n7 aaddmS anoBucW amem agllaalag awraNj uowwoa satoadS auuuW poA.iasg0 — I algn.L 9 [ OZ x300100 A3AxnS 90xnos3W a30x3wanS ?IOOQ IAWVA0I90HISVa CASTROGIOVANNI DOCK SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY OCTOBER 2016 • - Typical silt sand substrate observed on-site • Silt sand substrate within project area w Page 4 of 4