Loading...
Agenda 09/15/1998 R COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA Tuesday, September 15, 1998 9:00 a.m. NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITII TItE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SUBMITTED IN WRITING WITIt EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AT LEAST 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS". ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH TIlE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS PERMISSION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAIRED ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. LUNCH RECESS SCtlEDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. 1. INVOCATION - Reverend Mark Gorgans, First Alliance Church PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE APPROVAL OF AGENDAS APPROVAL OF CONSENT AGENDA. B. APPROVAL OF SUMMARY AGENDA. C. APPROVAL OF REGULAR AGENDA. APPROVAL OF MINUTES PROCLAMATIONS AND SERVICE AWARDS A. PROCLAMATIONS 1 September 15, 1998 J e 1) Proclamation proclaiming the week of September 21-27, 1998 as Pollution Prevention Week. To be accepted by Allen R. Ruth, Director of Environmental Health and Engineering. 2) Proclamation proclaiming September 14 - 18, 1998 as Industry Appreciation Week. To be accepted by John Passidomo. B. SERVICE AWARDS 1) Yves Cazimir, Department of Revenue - 5 Years 2) Bonnie Stephens, Mail Center - I0 Years 3) Barbara Smith, Pelican Bay - 10 Years 4) Eula Parkman, Parks and Recreation - I0 Years C. PRESENTATIONS APPROVAL OF CLERK'S REPORT ,4,. ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO RESERVES FOR CONTINGENCIES. PUBLIC PETITIONS COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1) Approval of a resolution supporting the Army Corps of Engineers Southwest Florida Feasibility Study for Feasibility Report of the Central and South Florida Comprehensive Review Study (Restudy), to be conducted and funded in partnership with the South Florida Water Management District. 2) Recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners authorize staff to contract for consultant services to develop the BayshoredGateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan. B. PUBLIC WORKS C. PUBLIC SERVICES D. SUPPORT SERVICES E. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 1) Third Quarter Revenue and Expenditure Report - Fiscal Year 1998 F. AIRPORT AUTHORITY CGUNTY ATTORNEY'S REPORT BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A. Report of the Ad Hoc Ethics Standards Review Committee 2 September 15, ! 998 11. B. Appointment of member to the Pelican Bay MSTBU Advi~ry Committee. C. Appointment of member to the Emergency Medical Servlce~ Advi~oo' Council. OTHER ITEMS OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS B. PUBLIC COMMENT ON GENERAL TOPICS PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE HEARD IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING STAFF ITEMS 12. 13. 14, 15. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS - BCC A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS B. ZONING AMENDMENTS C. OTHER BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS A. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS B. OTHER STAFF'S COMMUNICATIONS BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' COMMUNICATIONS Immokalee Road ~afety improvement schedule and potential for ultimate four-lane improvement. (Commissioner Berry). 16. CONSENT AGENDA - Ali mattcr~ listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one motion without ~eparate discussion of each item. If discussion is d~ired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. B. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES PUBLIC WORKS 1) Approve Change Order No. 3 to Contract No. 97-2696, South County Regional Water Treatment Plant Odor Control System, Project No. 70020. 2) Authorize a Budget Amendment for South Regional Water Treatment Facility Odor Control Syatem Operating Costs. 3 September 15, 1998 17. 3) CONTINUED FROM SEPTEMBER 1, 1998 - To approve the transfer of property from Collier County to the State of Florida to satisfy the requirements of Permit #11-00368-S. ~Ieli Property) 4) Approve Bid #98-2840, "Mowing of Grassed or Vegetated Areas," and direct staff to award contract to Iow bidder. 5) Recommendation that the Board of Count)' Commissioners authorize the procurement of engineering sen'ices for the implementation phase of the Clam Bay Restoration and Management Plan. 6) Approve a contract increase for Commercial Land Maintenance, Inc. which exceeds ten percent of the original contract amount. PUBLIC SERVICES D. SUPPORT SERVICES 1) Board approval of attached Resolution adopting the Collier County Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. 2) To Award Bid g98-2818 for furnishing and delivery of herbicides/pesticides and fungicides. E. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Fo 1) Budget Amendment Report BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE 1) 2) ~: NEED MOTION author/zing the Chairman to sign Satisfaction of Lien for Services of the Public Defender for Case Nos.: 9701765MMA, 9705159MMA, 9701270CFA, 9706507MMA, 9702947MMA, 9702310MMA, 9803695MMA, 9802016MMA, 9709789MMA, 9800482MMA, 9801224MMA, 9802628MMA, 9705072MMA, 970573MMA, 9705832MMA, 9706020MMA, 9709401MMA, 9710171MMA, 9709669MMA. 9805327MMA, L OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS 1) Recommend that the Board of County Commissioners endorse the Clerk of the Circuit Court's Office Grant Application for the State of Florida Drug Control and System Improvement Formula Grant Program, Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Assistance Program, Five Percent Set Aside Funds. COUNTY ATTORNEY J- A/RPORT AUTHORITY SUMMARY AGENDA - ALL ITEMS APPEARING UNDER THIS SECTION MUST MEET THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA: 1) A RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL FROM STAFF; 2) UNANIMOUS RECOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL BY THE COLLIER 4 September 15, 1998 COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION OR OTIIER AUTEIORIZING AGENCIE~ OF ALL MEMBERS PRESENT AND VOTING; 3) NO WRITTEN OR ORAL OBJECTIONS TO ITEM RECEIVED BY STAFF, THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION, O'I~ER AUTItORI?.ING AGENCIES OR THE BOARD, PRIOR TO THF. COMMENCEMENT OF THE BC MEETING ON WFIICtl THE ITEMS ARE SCiIEDULED TO BE FIEARD; AND 4) NO INDIVIDUALS ARE REGISTERED TO SPEAK IN OPPOSITION TO THE ITEM. 18. ADJOURN IN(~UIRIF_~ CONCERNING CHANGES TO THE BOARD'S AGENDA SHOULD BE MADE TO THE .~OUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE AT 774-~383. 5 September 15, 1998 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' MEE77N~ ,~EPTEMBER 15~ 1998 ~,,DD; ITEM lO(D? - DISCUSSION REGARDING SECOND GOVERNMENT CABLE TI/ CHANNEL (COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE). CONTINUE: ITEM 16(B)(;1)- NQ DA TE~: TO APPROVE THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY FROM COrrlER COUNTY TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF PERMIT #11-00368-.s. (MELI PROPERTY). (COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINE). ~~Gi:?~~...~'''~ ................. ~ .................................... "'"':'"""~ CODE ENFORCEMENT CASE NOS~ 70115-050 GUY J. AND RUTH B. L4RUSSI; 71110-034 GUY J. AND RUTH B. IHRUSS!; 71119-014 GUY .1. AND RUTH B. IARUSSI,. 71217-046 BUY.I. AND RUTH B. IARUSSI; 71217-048 GUY J. AND RUTH B. IARUSSI. PROCLAtAA TZON WHEREAS, Colh'er County tokes 9rent pride in the natural beauty of its coosthhe, bays, rivers and streams; and its unique IocaNons; and WHEREAS, Collier County supported clean and safe water, land and air for all its residents and visitors; and WHEREAS, pollution prevention, also known as source reduction, is a proactlve approach which eliminates or reduces pollution as its source; and pollution prevention is the most environmentally sound method of protectin9 natural resourc&¢ and reducir~] health and safety risk~ to workers and the 9eneral public; and A TTES T: WHEREAS, by focusin9 on pollution prevention, Collier County can meet the challenge of having bo th a healthy community and business environment for its re~'den'~$ and vi$itor~; and ' "~' '; .::'r '~.~ WHEREAS, recogm~i~ Pollun~n Prev~tion W~R is an opportuniW for NOW THE~EFOR~ be tt procN~med bY the ~rd of ~u~'Co~i~$ioners of ~o]/ier ~oun~ :'Florida, that S~piembe$.~l-2Z~8 be desi9~ted as , ,.. .~ '.~. ,:,~ '.( .'. ,' .. ~ ...~ ~ (.¥) .:~:,'. "r . ~BOARD OF ~~¢O~TSSTONE~5 DWIGHT E BROCK, CLERK AGENDA LTEM SEP 1 5 1998 Pg. / PROCLAtAA T.rON WHEREAS, industry in Collier County is vital to the community'~ economic health and Collier County's cxistin9 industries ~r~ ~h~ k~y ~o ~ prosperous futur~: and V/HEI~EA$, the Economic Development Council of Collier County, through the public/private partnership for economic prosperity with the Collier County Board of County Commissioners works to create additional economic opportunity in Collier County through the retention and expansion of high v~ge jobs; and WHEREAS, eighty percent of the new jobs created will come from ex/sting industry in Colh'er County; and WHEREAS, Collier County's industries help sustain our qua#ty of life and ex,emplify ht~h standards of excellence and a positive, responsible approach to economic diversification and community enhancement: ond ' '' '' ~:~'"' m~' "'" WHEI~EA$, the Economic Development Coundl of Colh'ei' ~ounty and the Collier Coun~ $obrd of County Commimioners $~l~e all businesses for makro3 Cdh'er County o desirable place'~o'llve ~ work. ... ,'.'.. ~... ',',.::.,., ..... ,.. NOW TME~EPO~E, be it proclaimed by the Board of (,ou~..'~'ommissioners of 'Collier County, Florida, that. 5'epee'tuber 14-18, 'I99B be designated as ~ ' . ., , ~. ,~ '~.o . . ~.~. ·. '." ' '",:' "~, '~ "~.~ ' ~,.~ ~'~ a'nd u~e all residents to'salote' our industH~ brat thai~ employees · ' ' ~' ~',"k',,', ~x ~' 'o~' ' ~' bONE AND OQOEI~D 'f'i~$ lffth ~y of ~f~b~r, I998 cor zE COUN A T'7ES T: D H/IGHTE BQOCK, CLERK A i-rE "' 5 SEP ! 5 13,33 .,EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVAL OF A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING TIlE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS SOUTHWEST FLORIDA FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR FEASIBILITY REPORT OF THE CENTRAL AND SOUTH FLORIDA COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW STUDY .O:~STUDY), TO BE CONDUCTED AND FUNDED IN PARTNERSHIP WITH THE SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners consider endorsement of the southwest Florida feasibility phase of the Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) Central and South Florida Comprehensive Review Study (Restudy) by-adoption of the attached Resolution, as directed by the Board at the September 1, 1998 BCC meeting. CONSIDERATIONS: (Note: This background information is derived from notes generated by the Governor's Sustainable Commission Executive Director distributed at the May 20, 1998 Southwest Issues Group meeting, and from information previously provided to the Board at the September 1, 1998 meeting by the Corps.) The Central and Southern Florida (C&SF) Project, which was first authorized by Congress in 1948, is a multi-purpose project that provides flood control; water supply for municipal, industrial and agricultural uses; prevention of saltwater intrusion; water supply for Everglades National Park; and protection of fish and wildlife resources. The project includes about 1,000 miles each of levees and canals, 150 water control structures, and 16 major pump stations. The South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) is responsible for operation and maintenance of the project. As part of the C&SF Project, the Caloosahatchee River was dredged and the Franklin and Ortona locks were constructed. Consequently, the C&SF Project provides flood protection and water supply for the Caloosahatchee River basin. When Lake Okeechobee is above its regulation schedule, freshwater releases are made from the lake to the Caloosahatchee River. Freshwater intrusion causes serious environmental harm to the Caloosahatchee estuary. Lake Okeechobee provides for the water supply needs of the basin. However, as water supply demands on Lake Okeechobee from throughout the south Florida area increase in the future, the ability of the C&SF Project to supply the needs of the Caloosahatchee basin will decline. In 1992, Congress authorized the C&SF Project Comprehensive Review Study (Restudy). The purpose of this phase of the Restudy is to reexamine the Central and Southern Florida Project to determine the feasibility of structural and operational modifications essential to restoration of the Everglades and south Florida ecosystems while ~roviding for other water-related needs of the region such as urban and agricultural wa 'x ~up~.~ SEll, 1 5 1998 and flood control. In 1996 Congress directed that a comprehensive plan be submitted to Congress by July I, 1999. Alternative plans are being developed that include facilities such as reservoirs to improve conditions in the Caloosahatchee estuary as well as to provide for agricultural and urban water supply needs in the basin. Detailed planning and design of the facilities recommended for the Caloosahatchee basin will occur after submission of the comprehensive plan to Congress. While the facilities being considered for the Caloosahatchee basin will help meet the needs of the basin, there are additional water resources problems and opportunities in Southwest Florida that require studies that are beyond the scope of the comprehensive plan. In order to fully investigate these problems and opportunities, the Corps of Engineers, with the sponsorship of the South Florida Water Management District, will initiate a study of southwest Florida. A recommendation to conduct the Southwest Florida study will be included in the recommendations made to Congress as part of the comprehensive plan. The Southwest Florida study will be accomplished in two phases - the reconnaissance phase and the feasibility phase. The purpose of the reconnaissance phase, which could be initiated in Fiscal Year 1999, will be to identify the problems and opportunities to be considered in the study and to develop the scope of work for the feasibility phase. The feasibility study, which could be initiated in Fiscal Year 2000, will be cost shared 50-50 with the South Florida Water Management District. The Executive Director of the Sustainable Commission, Bonnie Kranzer, Ph.D., AICP, wrote to Commissioner Mac'Kie and Lee County Commissioner John Albion on June 16, 1998 explaining that the Restudy team is revising its report.and will provide it to the Army Corps of Engineers. Specifically, the southwest issues component of the report presently contains two recommendations, (1) that a feasibility study be performed for the entire southwest region of the State, and (2) that a demonstration project for water storage in the Caloosahatchee Basin be accelerated (including land acquisition). The Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council discussed the Study on August 20 and endorsed it unanimously. Additional background information provided by the ACOE and the Executive Director of the Sustainable Commission was provided to the Board for consideration during the September 1, 1998 meeting. Colonel Joe Miller, Commander, Jacksonville District, USACE made a presentation to the Board on the Restudy at this meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: The feasibility port/on fthe Restudy requires no direct funding contr/bution by Collier County. The estimated cost of the feasibility study is ten million dollars, to be shared by the ACOE and the SFWMD. There is a potential fiscal impact to Collier County in the form ofstaffresourees, in the event the Board authorizes staff participation in the feasibility study. If this is realized, staffwill absorb such assignments into our work program. SEP 1 5 1998 GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The feasibility study will have no impact on the Collier County Growth Management Plan, however, reports or recommendations generated as a result of the feasibility phase of the Restudy may have an impact or impacts on the County's Growth Management Plan and will be evaluated accordingly. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners approve the Resolution supporting the Feasibility Study (phase II) of the Central and South Florida Comprehensive Review Study (Restudy) PREPARED BY: ~__.__._ Date: f/Y/f,/-' l~ob~/rt J. Mulhere, AICP " -- Planning Services Department Director APPROVED BY: .~'~ ~ '~~[7 Date: ~'r~--~y Vincent A. Cautero, AICP Community Development & Environmental Services Administrator No. 'X/. . SEP 1 5 1998 pg. 3 __ 1 2 6 ? $ 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 RESOLUTION 98- RESOLbTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ENDORSING INCORPORATION OF A SOUTHWEST FLORIDA FEASIBILITY STUDY rN THE FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE C&SF COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW STUDY (RESTUDY). THIS SOLrTHWF.~T FLORIDA FEASIBILITY STUDY WILL BE CONDUCTED AND FUNDED JOINTLY BY THF. LrNITED STATES ARMY' CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND THE SOU'I'It FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT. WHEREAS, the Central and Southern Florida (C&SF) Project, which was first authorized by Congress in 1948, is a multi-purpose proj~c! that provides flood control; water supply for municipal industrial and agricultural uses; prevention of saltwater intrusion', water supply for Everglades National Park; and protection of fish and wildlife resources; and 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 WHEREAS, in 1992, Congress authorized the C&SF Project Comprehensive Review Study (Restudy) to reexamine the Central and Southern Florida Project to detcm~inc the feasibility of struclural and operational modifications csscntial Io restoration of Irc Everglades and south Florida ecosystems while providing for other water-related needs of the region such as urban and agricullural water supply and flood control; and WHEREAS, in November 1994, the United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) completed the reconnaissance phase of the Restudy which set forth restoration issues and six alternative plans for consideration by local communities and participating agencies; and 29 WHEREAS, in 1995, the USACE and the South Florida Water Management 30 District (District), in partnership, began the feasibility phase of the C&SF Restudy, 31 detailing the scope oFwork and the process needed to select a preferred alternative for the 32 feasibility study; and 33 WHEREAS, Southwest Florida is a critical component of the South Florida 34 ecosystem; and O/ 35 WHEREAS, the Caloosahatchee River is the only portion of the Central and 36 Southern Florida (C&SF) Project in Southwest Florida and thereforo the only basin 37 included in that area included in flae C&SF Restudy; and SEP !5 '°:'"': ~ WIIEREA5. there is a lack of dala on. and analysis of. many of tile ,.v;ucr 2 ~csourccs and related conditions, problems, opportunities and needs of al'lc other waler ~ hasin~ of thc Southwcsl Florida region, and ~ WIIEREAS. a feasibilily study specifically for all of Southwcsl Florida would 5 invesligate long term needs, problems and potential solutions perlaining to water ~, resources which are critical Io the fulure of the region; and 7 Whereas. thc Restudy proposes to provide additional water storage capacity and 8 reduce flooding events, to enhance water supply sources in times of drought, to improve o walcr quality by reducing occurrences of freshwater and saltwater intrusion, and to m rcslore tile Florida ltay and Everglades ecosystems; and 1~ \VHEREAS. the southwest Florida fe,xsibility study will have no direct fiscal ~2 impacl on Collier (.'ounly. and the objectives of thc restudy are inlended to improve the 13 quality of life for Iht citizens of Collier Counly; ~-~ NO\V TIIF. REFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY 15 COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: l t, Tile Board of Counly Commissioners supporls thc joint et'Cons of'the USACE and ~7 the District in developing the feasibility study phase of the C&SF Restudy Project. is This Rcsoh, lion adopted after motion, second and majority vole favoring same. lo DATED: 2¢) 21 ATTEST: 22 DWIGIIT E. BROCK. Clerk 23 2~ 25 26 27 28 2~ 30 Approved as Po form and .'il legal sufficiency: 32 36 37 Da BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Barbara B. Berry. Chatnnan I EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIssIo~ AUTHORIZE STAFF TO CONTRACT FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES TO DEVELOP THE BAYSHORE/GA~WAY TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PLAN. OBJECTIVE: To have the Bo',rd of County Commissioners author/z~ staff to contract for consultant services from Landers, Atkins Planners, Inc. (Project No. 00109) for the purpose ofprepar/ng the Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment Plan. -CCONSIDERATIONS: In the FY 97/98 budget, the Board identified their support for community planning for certain areas of the County by author/zing approximately $50,000 for outside consulting services. Consistent with this objective, the Board of County Commissioners reviewed a scope of work to develop a Bayshore/Gateway Triangle redevelopment plan and on June 16, 1998 directed staffto proceed with the RFP process to select a consultant. The tasks and deliverables associated with the preparation of the redevelopment plan for the Bayshore and Gateway Triangle areas include the following: 1. Analysis of Assets and Opportunities Land Use Data Analysis · Property and Business Owner Interviews · Market and Location Analysis · Existing Transportation Framework Analysis Community Preference Survey 2. Three Community Workshops i: Community Vision 2: Alternative Concepts 3: Preferred Redevelopment Plan 3. Preferred Redevelopment Plan Design G-.idelines, Zening Overlay, Transportation Framework · Four Catalyst Projects with Cash Flows · Illustrative Plans to Include Land Use Plan, Transportation Plan, Open Space Plan, Design Guidelines Plans and Detailed Plans of Selected Subareas, Corridors, Local Streets and Prototype Blocks 4. Implementation Plan .. · Marketing Strategy · Recommended Funding Sources · Evaluation of Establishing CRA · Schedule of Actions: Timing and Phasing With the authorization to issue a Five Proposals were received. A selection commit~ osatq were sent to over sixty vendors. RFP, staffadverfised and inv/tat/ons to submit Prol ~e rna~~ SEP 1 5 1998 two from the Gateway Triangle area, evaluated the proposals. The selection committee met on August 7, 1998 to rank the respondents and short list the qualified candidates for interviews before the selection committee. Three finns were scheduled for interviews on August 14, I998. Based on the presentations and an evaluation of the qualifications and experience of each respondent, Landers, Atkins Planners, Inc. was selected by the commit'tee as most able to successfully achieve all the goals in the scope of work. In order to utilize funds before the end of the current fiscal year, staffnegotiated with the selection committee's top ranked firm of Landers, Atkins Planners, Inc. ]'he contract amount for the Landers, Atkins team was $ I00,900 and includes a breakdown as follows: Landers, Atkins Planners, Inc. Planning Services $66,700 Hammer, Siler, George Assoc. Economic Consulting Services $28,700 Work Place Partners, Inc. Community Facilitation $5,500 The redevelopment area for this project includes the land area within and the road corridors of Davis Boulevard, Airport Road and US 41 East (Gateway Triangle) and the entire Bayshore MSTU area which includes the Bayshore Drive corridor fi'om US 41 to its terminus and all local roads within the Bayshore MSTU. The Transportation Services fund 102 had funds designated for improvements on Bayshore Drive. On August 15, 1998 the Bayshore Avalon Beautification Advisory Committee discussed this issue and voted to support the Board's use of these funds for a redevelopment consultant. .FISCAL IMPACT:_The fiscal impact of this project will require the approval of budget amendments in the amount of $I00,900 for Landers, Addns Planners, Inc. to perform services as outlined in the scope of work and the contract. Funds for these services are available in the following: Comprehensive Planning Fund 111-138317-634999 Other Contractual Servicex Comprehensive Planning Fund 111-9190 I0-991000 Rexerved for Conn'ngenciex Transportation Services Fund 102-163646-634999 Other Contractual Servicer $35,500 $22,900 $42,500 TOTAL 100,900 _GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Policy 4.7 of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan adopted in October, 1997 states that redevelopment plans for existing commercial and residential areas may be considered by the Board. Both Bayshore Drive and Davis Boulevard are listed as possible areas for consideration. Although the Plhn is not effective at this time, it does however, identify- the intent of the Board of County Commissioners to consider the redevelopment potential of this area. -RECOMMENDATI'ON', That the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Board Chairman to approve Project No. 00109 and the budget amendments necessary fir Lah(:j~N~A ITEM Atldns Planners, Inc. in the amount of $100,900.No. SEP 1 5 1998 p~,. PREPARED BY: COMP~SIVE PLANNING SECTION REVIEWED BY: BARBARA A. C,~CCI-{IONE,~AiCP PLANNINO SERVICES DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: Mr, r,.~., D~Cror~ ~mAm~O~W^nO~ s~r~v~cms APPROVED BY: PUBLIC WORKS DMSION APPROV~ By: ~ C~ A. CAUTERO, AICP, A~MINISTRA~R COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ENVIRO~~ SERVICES DIVISION DATE SEP 1 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY THIRD QUARTER REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE REPORT - FISCAL YEAR 1998 OBJECTIVE: To present to the Board of County Commissioners a report on actual revenues and expenditures in major funds as compared to quarterly budgets. CONSIDERATIONS: Included as an attachment to this Executive Summary is a report on major revenues and expenditures from October 1, 1997 through June 30, 1998 which is the end of the third quarter of Fiscal Year 1998. This report was developed in accordance with Board direction to expand the scope of quarterly fiscal reporting in order to provide a more comprehensive analysis of the County's financial condition. The format of this report now includes performance measures and expenditure and revenue detail by individual department. Explanations of major variances from the third quarter revenue/expenditure budgets and/or performance measures are included departmental . . on the individual Quarterly Budget Execution Review worksheets. The fourth quarter budget figures on the individual departmental Quarterly Budget Execution Review worksheets represent the amended budget as of June 30, 1998 and the fourth quarter actual figures represent the FY 98 budget forecasts. .Ad Valorem Taxes Year to date General Fund (001) ad valorem tax revenues actually exceeds the FY 98 budget forecast. As a result, a surplus of $127,000 is now projected. intergovernmental Revenue~ Within the intergovernmental revenues category, there are positive variances projected in sales tax, state revenue sharing, the 6 cent local option gas tax, and in tourist development tax revenues. (General Fund Impact) The current projection for sales tax exceeds the forecast used during the development of the FY 99 budget by $500,000. In addition, there is a large surplus of $1,167,700 projected in state revenue sharing funds. June is the close of the state fiscal year and the June revenue sharing allocation will a/so be known prior to the adoption of the millage rates. This will provide the Board with additional latitude to either increase General Fund reserves, fund additional programs or capital projects, or reduce the General Fund millage rate at the final budget public hearing scheduled for September 23, 1998. AGENDA ITEM SEP 1 5 1998 Pg.. ] (Road Construction CIP Impact) Based on year-m-date receipts there is a shortfall projected in the five cent local option gas tax. Due to the incorporation of Marco Island, it was recognized that there would be a reduction in local option gas tax revenues distributed to Collier County. As such, a separate reserve was estabIished in the gas tax supported Roads CIP Fund (313). Therefore, there will be no impact to budgeted road construction projects due to the projected shortfall in the five cent local option gas taX. (Tourist Tax Impact) There is a surplus in tourist tax revenues. This surplus was projected previously and was incorporated in the FY 98 forecasts in the tourist tax funds. Enterprise Fund Revenues In the enterprise funds, there are projected shortfalls in ambulance fee revenue and in Airport Authority revenue. The shortfall in ambulance fee revenue is attributable to adjustments in Medicaid reimbursements based on the results of a State of Florida audit (presented to the Board during this fiscal year via separate Executive Summary) and based on the actual collection rate. Due to the projected revenue shortfall, coupled with the inclusion of accounts receivable in the FY 98 forecast carryforward, the cash flow within the EMS fund is very fight Staff has been monitoring this situation closely in conjunction with the Finance Department The EMS fund may need supplemental appropriations from the General Fund prior to the end of FY 98. In future years, the carryforward amount will include only actual cash. This will eliminate the potential for overstating the actual carryforward mount. The shortfall in airport revenue is due to less than budgeted Avgas sales at both the Immokalee and Everglades City airports. However, state law requires that the County only appropriate 95% of available revenues and ctm'ent FY 98 projections are within this 5% limit. There are surpluses now projected ia water and sewer revenues. These revenues are being projected conservatively due to the limited data under the new rate structure. There is also a surplus projected in landfall tipping revenue, which is a function of additional tonnage being received and processed at the landfill sites. Impact Fee Revenues Impact fee.. revenues are a volatile revenue source and are difficult to project as revenues are based in part on the timing of building permit issuance and the types of development to occur. AGENDA ITEM No. / 5EP 15 1998 Pg. .~ However, the construction industry has remained very strong in Collier County throughout fiscal year 1998. As such, there are surpluses projected within each impact fee category that exceed the forecast used in developing the FY 99 budget. As such, there will be additional impact fee revenue available to fund future growth-related capital projects in the County. Correspondingly, there is also a large surplus forecast in building permit fee revenue. These updated impact fee projections were incorporated into the budget in late August at the same time staff adjusted capital project forecasts to reflect projects that will actually be under contract prior to the end of the fiscal year. Beach Parking Fees Beach parking fee revenues have been relatively flat and the current projection is consistent with actual FY 97 revenue levels. An updated report will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners to reflect FY 98 year end actual revenues and expenditures. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None F1SCAL IMPACT: Based on the additional $1,794,700 in General Fund revenue now projected, staff will present to the Board recommendations for budget adjustments at the September 23, 1998 final budget public hearing. This will allow the Board to make final budget decisions, prior to the adoption of the FY 99 millage rates. RECOM2ME~ATIONS: That the Board of County Commissioners review and discuss the attached information, including the revised format of the report. Submitted by: ~ ~ "~~ J2)ATE: ~/7;q°a' Michael Smykowski, OMB Director September 7,1998 Approved by: Robert Fernandez, County Administrator DATE: September 7, 1998 AGENDA ITEM No. SEP 1 5 1998 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA QUARTERLY REVENUE & EXPENDITURE REPORT THIRD QUARTER FISCAL YEAR 1998 AGENDA ITEM No._ SEP I 5 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS FI'ND~S) Tabie of Con'~¢n:s Introduction Revenue Surruma n' General Fund (001/ MSTD General Fund ~111) Cormm. unlv.,. Development Fund (113) Road and Bndse Fund 1101) Touris~ Dex dopmem Funds ~193 - 196) Addmonal Special Rex enue Funds Capflal Improx emem Program (CIP, Counn Wa~er and Se~er Dis~ict Fund Sohd Waste Fund Emergency Me&cal Se~'ices (EMS Fund Aupon Amhon~. Fund Addmonal Ente~rise. Ime~al Sec'ice. and T~st Funds 6 7 37 ,44 50 61 66 72 75 AGEND_A ITEM No. SEP 15 1998 Pg._ INTRODUCTION ASSUMPTIONS iPersonal Ser~iceL.- In th~s report, the third quarter budgets for Personal Services expenditures reflect the firs: mneteen of r-,~ enL,,-six pa.',' perlods for the fiscal .','ear. or 73.1 percent of Ihe annual budget. Negative var3ances from the quar~erl,, budget are usually due to vacant posltlons. ~ The third quarter budgets for Operating expenses reflected hereto are normally ?$ percent Oflhe annual budgets. Exceptions ,.,. ill be reflected m the quaner/y budgets when, for known reasons, part3cular deparmaems or functional areas ¢cost centers) have fixed expenditures, such as indirect cost allocations to the General Fund lO01 ~ or scheduled mterfund transfers, which would othenvise cause year-to-date figures to fall well above or belox~ a -< percent level ~ Equipment purchases and building facfl~r:,., improvements generally do not occur tn a regular. incremental fashion as do personal services and operatme expenditures. Thus, the quarterly budgets reflected m th~s repo.'q x~ dl x a,"5 by radix lduaI deparm~ent functIonal area 3Ian5 year-to-date capital outlay expenditures are planned to occur in the fourth quarter. . S£? 1 5 1998 Pg'.. ~ AGENDA I T..T~ M SEP 1 5 1998 GENEI:L.-kL FUND (001) Fund Summary GENEILx. L Fl.'ND (001) 3RD QTR FY 98 EXPENDITURES 3rd O:r Budgel .:=d Q:: Y-T-D FL'ND TOTALS Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr Budlzet Budget Budget Approprialions Co Commissioners 593.5(,0 593.500 435,274 Other GenerM & Adm 739 30 ) 809.894 605,608 Co Anome,. 1.361,500 1.367.541 1,004,703 Co ..X, dmm~srranon 611.5<,3 6 ] 1,500 449.524 Of,: of Pubhc Info 160.300 160,300 117,111 Oft. ofM.ct & Bud.ce~ 406.900 467294 343,938 SupporI Sen ices 6,411,300 6.45;2,879 4,794.751 Public Serx~ces 15,$88,800 16, 153,7[;4 11,814,660 Commumt3 De,,. Eh', I. 123.200 I. 141.200 844,464 Pubhc \Vorks 1,276,500 1,296,685 960,969 ..,, ..5 Courts Rel. Agencies 3, ~.3,700 658,456 493,842 Refunds 20.300 20.300 15,225 Tfrs Operaung Funds I1.147,100 14,215,600 11254,886 Tfrs Capa~l Funds 7,437,900 7.43 ~.900 5,915,712 Tfrs. Const Officers 62.093,000 62.093.000 52,083,062 Subtotal' I 12,99..1,800 l ! 3,509,87' 3 91,233,759 Rescrx es 5,496.700 5213,71~ 0 Total Ex pendim res: I I S,491.500 I I~.7')'1..,.~44 91233.759 18.000.000 ) 6.000.000 14.000.000 12.000.006) 10,000,000 $ ,00O .000 6.O(K) ,4.000.000 2,000,0OO 0 3rd Qtr % of Y-T-D Budget Variance 422.013 71.1°,i~ .2.2Oo 420.326 51.9% -229% 864,130 63.2% -I0 378395 61.9% -II 6°,~ 105.929 66 I% -'~ 235,612 50.4"~ o -23 2°0 4,576,696 70.6% -3 40 I 0,657,495 662% -7 0° o 714,209 62.6% -Il 883,383 68.1% -6 0% 400,829 60.9% -14 7 0.0% - 75 Oe ° 11.354.886 799% 0 5.915,712 79 5% 0 52,083,062 $3 9°,; 0 0° ° 89,0d2,657 78 4% -I 0 0 0% N A 89,042.657 75 0~,o -I S £P 15 lgg8 pg.. ~' FUND TO]ALS ~el enue$ Cost Alloca:~or, Plat, Cour, Fmcs and Fees .Ad Valorem Tares State Sales Tat State Revenue Sharing Fedcra! HLT En:¢~nsc F=~d PILT D~p~r,: Re', ~ Imeres: T6s fm EIec;ed Offcls T6s fm O:h~; Fur, Js M~sceJianeou~ TotM Re~ enue: GENERAl. FUND (O0l) Fund Summary (Continuedl .Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr % of % Budget Budget Budget Y-T-D Budget Variance 3,182.200 3.182.200 3,182.200 3.1 ?&.800 99.9;0 -0 l' ~ 2.125.00F} 2.125.000 1.593.'~50 1.'t61 ..199 82 9Q o ' q°; 71,892,500 71,892.500 69.376,263 69,451.030 96.6% 0.1°,o 14,642.400 14,642,400 11,397,568 12,072,124 82.4% 4.6% 5,582.600 $,582.600 4,160,31 I S.! 98,939 93.1% 18.6% 300.f,0. 300.000 0 0 0 0% N A I .~,.50u 1.447.500 l ...:,.: 7.5 O0 1.456.3 $2 I O0 6% 0,6° o 4.$50.700 4,932,:09 3.699.532 3,$28,205 '77.6% 26o~ 1.010.O(,O 1,01 (I,OOt~ 757.500 1,022.330 101.2% 26.20 o 3.?$5.10u 3,755. I O0 0 0 0.0% N A 92.:..m9 924,400 733.866 733,866 79.4~ o 0 0°~ o .':65.2r)'-) 568,200 426.150 471,$81 83 0% $ 0° o ;L,.? 1~,.6'"' 110.392,609 96.-'.:.639 99,I 75,056 $95°° 2,2°° 0 5"2 EXPL.*NATION OF VARIA.NCES 16.r,35.4(,6 97 7% 2 0°o Revenue Ad Valorem Taxes Based on actual revenues received, a surplus of S127.000 ts projected. State Sales T0x: The quarterly budget for this hem is based on historical receipts modified by the initial FDOR projecnon of the ~mpact on this revenue source brought about by the mcorporanon of the Ctty of Marco lsland A surplus of SS00.00O ~s currently projected. State Revenue Shanng Based on actual revenues received, a surplus of Sl.167.?O0 ts nov,.' projected. %hscellaneous In&feet cost retmbursements have been pard tn full for thc .,.'car. AGENDA ITEM No. $ C"" I SEP 1 5 1998 Pg.. ~ MSTD GENERAL FUND (111) Fund Summary MSTD GENERAL FUND (111) 3RD QTR FY 98 EXPENDITURES Amended Budget 3rd Qtr Budgel 3rd Qtr Y-T-D 9.0OO .O00 $ .000.000 7.000,000 6 .(~0.000 5,000.000 4,000,000 3.000.000 2.000.000 ! .000.000 FUND TOTALS Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr % of % Budget Budget Budget Y-T-D Budget Variance Appropriations Other General Admin. 217, 100 217, 100 217,100 217, 100 100.05'0 0.0% Franchise Admm. 221.300 447,882 333,523 125,710 28.1% -46.4% Comm. Dev. Admm. 146,200 146,200 107,058 108,178 74.0% 0.8% Planning Services 779,100 834.394 613,366 513,295 61.5% -12.0% Housing & Urban Imp. 23,600 23,600 17,700 0 0.0% -75.0% Code Enforcement 1,286,900 1,286,900 948,835 821.20-1 63.8% -9.9% Division of Forestry 15.000 19.563 14,672 19,482 99.6% 24.6% Parks & Recreation 1,635,200 1,669,458 1,156.277 970,361 58.1% -I 1.1% Transfers 8.009,000 8,009,000 8,735,694 8,738,694 109. 1% 0.0% Contnbuuons 1.800 1.800 0 0 0.0% N/A Subtotal: 12.335.200 12,655,897 12,1o, 7.226 11,514,024 91.0% -5.0% Reserves 2.456.500 2,394,429 0 0 0.0% N,'A Total Expend,tares: 14.791,700 15,050,326 12,147,226 11,514,024 76.5% -4.2% AGENDA ~.~T EM No. ~ff/:~ I., SEP 1 5 1998 MSTD GENERAL FUND (111) Fund Summary (Continued) FUND TOTALS Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr % of % Budget Budget Budget Y-T-D Budget Variance ~evenues Ad Valorem Taxes 8.394,400 8.394,400 8,108,990 8,114378 Occupational Licenses 470,000 470,000 470,000 476,199 CATV Franchise Fees 1,500,000 1,500,000 1,125,000 1,081,038 Other Franchise Fees 1,000.000 1,000,000 0 0 Interest, Miscellaneous 662,700 711,900 533,925 540,357 Transfers 757,900 757,900 707,900 70'7,900 Subtotal: 12.785.000 12.834.200 10.945.815 10.919.872 Carry Forward 2.608.000 2,817.426 2.817.426 2.817.426 Revenue Reserve (601.300) (601.300) 0 0 Total Revenue: 14.791.700 15.050.326 13.763.241 13.737,298 96.7% 0.1% 101.3% 1.3% 72, 1% -2.9% 0.0% 75.9% 0.9% 93.4% 0.0% 85.1% -0.2°.'o 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% N/A 91.3% -0.2% EXPLAN'ATION OF VARIANCES Revenue Other Franchise Fees: The Board did not implement the telecommunications ordinance. will be collected from this source in FY 98. As a result, no revenue AGENDA ITEM No. I SEP 1 5 1998 pg. 3¢.~ ___ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND (113) Fund Summary COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND (I 13) 3RD QTR FY 98 EXPENDITURES Amended Budg¢l 3rd Qtr Budl~¢! 3rd Qtr Y-T-D 3.000.000 2.500,000 2.000.000 1300,000 1.000,000 500,000 o Fund Totals Appropriadon$ Dev. Serx ices Admin. Planning Services Bldg. Rv~. & Pcm~. Work Recpm. & Ctrl. Trans£crs SubTotal: Reser~'es Total Expenditures: Adopted Attended 3rd Q~r 3rd Qtr % of % Budget Budgel Budge! Y-T-D Budgel Variance 1.018,9(K) 2.250,400 2,739.9(,¢.) 317.500 1.014,300 7.341.009 5,2'78. 12,619,100 1,027.509 769.672 650,763 633% -1 2,250,400 1,661,218 1.622,253 72.1% -I,7% 2,778,910 2,043,661 1.927,946 69.4% -.4.2% 317.500 233,324 186.463 58.7% .14.8% 1,014.300 405,720 999,900 98.6% 586% 7.388.619 5,113.595 5,387.325 72,9°/; 3.7% 5,278, 100 0 0 0.(P/o N/A 12,666,719 5,113,595 5287325 42.5% 2.2% Revenues Charges for Ser,,,Sces 519,900 519,900 389,925 606,690 Building Pernits 4,16Z.000 4,16L000 2,959,182 3,955,550 Licenses & Permits 1,606.300 1,606,300 1,204.725 1.463,187 Interdep. Reimb. 27.700 27,700 20,775 15,486 Transfers In 106.000 106,000 91.550 91.550 I nterest, bt/sc. 315.700 315,700 236.775 354,049 Subtotal: 6,737,600 6,737,600 4,902,932 6,486.512 Can"), Fo~'ard 6,195,900 6,243,519 7,678,410 7,678,410 Revenue Reserve (314.400) (314,400) 0 0 Total R~venue: 12,619,100 12.666,719 12381.342 14,164.922 116.7% 41.7% 95.0% 23.9% 91.1% 16.1% 55.90/0 -19,1% 86.4% 00% 1121% 37.1% 96.3% 23.5% 123.~ 0.0% 0.0% lq/A II1 AG~[,tg~ ITEM No. ~'-'"/ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FUND (113) Fund Summary (Continued) EXPLANATION OF VARIANCES Revenue Building Perrnil,~: Higher than anticipated receipts in this area reflect continued growth in the residential and commercial building industry.. Charges for Ser~'ice~: These receipts, such as PUD petitions and PUD amendments fees, Development Plan Approval Fees, Tree Permit Fees, etc., are also related to the heahhy trends in the building industry. A GEND_..A ITEM No. SEP 1 5 1998 ROAD AND BRIDGE FUND (101) Fund Summary ROAD & BRIDGE FUND (101} 3RD QTR FY 98 EXPENDITURES ,.'kmcnded Budgct .ltd Qtr Budget 3rd Qtr Y.T-D 5.000.000 · 1,000.000 3.000.000 2.000.000 1.000,000 0 Fund Totals Adopted .Amended 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr % of % Budget Budget Budget Y-T-D Budget Variance Aopropriations Personal Services 4,871.500 4,871.500 3,561,067 3,218,159 66.1% -7.0% Operating 2.590.900 2.585,268 2,028,726 1,877.306 72.6% -5.9% Capital Oufia> 8.200 15,264 13.214 8.605 56.4% -30.2% SubTotal: 7.470.600 7.472.032 5.603.007 5,104.070 68.3% .6.7% Rcscrx cs 2 ] 8.300 212.61 I 0 0 0,0% N/A Total Expenditures: 7.688,900 7,684,643 5,603,007 5,104,070 66.4% -6.5% Revenu~ Tra ns fers 6,025.100 5,989,400 Mobile Home Licenses 108, 100 108,100 Motor Fuel lax Rebate 0 0 Reimbursements 41.300 69,800 Interest;Misc. 93.700 96,100 Subtotal: 6,26S,2£)0 6,263,400 CarD.' Fo~vard t.430,800 1,431,343 Revenue Rescr'.'e ( I 0, 100) ( I 0.100) Total Revenue: 7,688.900 7,684.643 4,512,748 4,512,748 75.3% 0.0% 41,078 101,692 94.1% 561% 0 85.218 N/A N,'A 52,350 145,139 207.9% 132.9% 72,075 99,047 103.1% 28.1% 4.678.251 4,943,844 78.9% 4.2% 2,087,722 2,087,722 145.9% 0.0% 0 0 0.0% N/A 6,765,973 7,031,566 91.5% 3.5% EXPLA. NATION OF VARIANCES Revenue Reimbursements: Receipts were greater than expected due to unanticipated maintenance services re support of capital projects. Interest'Miscellaneous: Actual receipts for petitions to vacate have been much higher than budgete~ AGENDA ITEM idered/~._ ~'~' / S EP 1 5 1998 TOURIST DEVELOPMENT FUNDS (193-196) Fund Summary Amended Budget 3rd Qtr Budget TOURIST DEVELOPMENT FUNDS (193-196) 3RD QTR FY 98 EXPENDITURES 3rd Qtr Y-T-D' 3,500,000 3,0O0,000 2.500,00O 2,000.000 1,500,000 1,000.000 500,000 0 Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr % of % Budget Budget Budget Y-T-D Budget Varianct A. pproprialions Spct Events Cat C (193) 0 2,485,343 Adv& Promo (194) 1,152.000 1,932,342 Beach Renourish (t951 378.300 3.031,279 \V? Dredging (195) 448.500 1,319,888 Economic Disaster i 196) 8.700 562,300 Tfrs MI Bch GO (195) 2.006,900 2.006,900 Tfrs Cmrcl Paper (I 95) 1.463,500 1.463,500 Transfers *'hsc 461,200 461.200 Subtotal: 5,919.100 13,262,752 Reserves 8~863.800 5,988.103 Total Expenses: 14,782.900 19,250,855 1,864,007 268,324 10.8% -64.2% 966,171 I. 144.038 59.2% 9.2°,0 2,273,459 1,I 16,763 36.8% -382% 989,631 848,598 64.3% -10.7% 422,850 4,500 0.8% -74.4% 1,807,295 1,807,295 90,1% 0.0% 1,402,579 1,402,579 95.8% 0.0% 361,063 361.063 78.3% 0.0% 10,087,055 6.953,160 52.4% -23.6% 0 0 0.0% 10,087.055 6.953,160 36.1% -16.3% Revenues Tourist Tax 7,312,000 7,312,000 6.412,624 6,714,469 91.8% 4.1% lmeres~;M isc. 432,500 432,500 324,375 336,190 77.7% 2.7% Subtotal: 7,744.500 7,744,500 6,736,999 7,050,659 91.0% 4. 1% Carry. For-.vard 7,426.300 11,894,255 10,975,510 10,975,510 92.3% 0.0% Revenue Reserve (387,900) (387,900) 0 0 0.0% N/A Total Revenue: 14,782.900 19,250.855 17,712,509 18,026,169 936% 1.6% Revenues revenues. EXPLANATION OF VARIANCES A surplus in tourist tax revenue is projected based on year-lo-date receipts in comparis AGENDA No. ,n to prior year SEP 1 5 1998 Additional S ecial Revenue Funds · Pelican Bay (109) · Pollution Control & Prevention (114) · Museum (198) · Pelican Bay Street Lighting (778) AGENDA ITEM No.__.~ ~/_ SEP 1 5 lgg8 Capital Improvement Program (CIP) · Regional Park Impact Fees (345) · Community Park Impact Fees (365, 368) · Library Impact Fees (355) · Roads - Gas Tax (313) · Road Impact Fees (331 - 340) · EMS Impact Fees (350) · Water System Development Fees (411) · Wastewater System Development Fees (413) AGEND.~ I..TEM No. <~5-,~ / SEP 1 5 1998 CAPITAL I.MPROVEMENT PROGRA.M (CIP) Expenditure~ .Non- Pro~ect E ~p s Projec~ £~pen~s Tfrs [~bi S~c Reset', es Total E xp~nses Regional Parks Impac! Fees (345) Adopted Amended 3rd QIr Y-T-D Budget Budgel Budget Encumbrances Y-T-D % of Es ps./Re~,. Budget Variance 0 24,650 N A 0 2.227 450.400 2,356,783 N'A 418.464 1,975.889 332.20{) 332.200 N A 0 310.712 873.500 76345 N A 0 0 1.656.100 2.819.778 N A Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr Budget Budget Budgel 77 ~,000 775,000 .~8 ! ,2 $0 49.600 49,600 37,200 902.700 2.036.379 2,036.3'9 I4 1200) (41200) 0 1.656. 100 2.819.779 2.65..I.$29 418.464 2.288.828 81 2% N A Y-T-D Y-T-D % of Encumbrances Exps~e~. B u d ge._._._.._..t.=_t '.'arlaace N,'A 7q1.132 10Ll'/. 17.1% N A 6.4.668 130 4'. 55 4". N A 2.036.379 100 0% 0 0% N A 0 N A N A 0 2.892.179 102 6% 8 4', Eap~ndilurrl Non-Projec~ E Tfrs~ D~bt S'.c. Tou, I Exp~ns~s CommuniD Parks Impact Fees Interest Nhsc CarD Forward To&al Re~ enue Community Parks Impact Fees (365, 368) AdopTed Amended 3rd Qtr Y-T-D Budget Budget Budget Encumbrances 0 367.500 N A 218.500 4. { 64.000 4,563.619 N A 189.102 0 0 NA 0 2 52 600 1.896.941 N A 0 6,316,600 6.828.090 N'A Y-T-D % of Eaps./Re~, Budgel 63.030 I 7.2~ ~ 450.?0q I0 5*'. 0 NA 0 0 % Variance NA N/A 407.602 543.730 80% NA Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr Y-T-D Budget Budget Budget Encumbrances 1.512.100 1,512.100 1.134,075 N/A 255.1(~ 255.100 191.325 N;A 4.637.800 5.149.200 5,149,291 N'A (88.40©1 (88,400) 0 N/A 6.316.600 6.828.090 6.474.6q I Y-T-D % of Exps./Res. Bu d%e_=__.___ I___1., Variance 1.714.902 113.4% 38.4% 214.568 84.1% 9.1',;. 5.149.291 1000% 0 0% 0 NA NA 0 7.078,761 103 7% 8 8% AGEI~D,~ ITEM L_. SEP 1 5 1998 CAPITAl. IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CIP} (Continued) Library Impac! Fees (355) Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr Budget Budgel Budget 561 t;¢/~ 5¢]l.r#Y; N & 420.c~/) 1.5Ol ,001 N A 312.3~ 312.3~) N A '61.~0 703.79 N A .,05... ~ ].lilt g~O N A Y-T.D Y.T-D % of £ncumbrance$ E t p'.~"R c',. Budget 74.642 413.1~68 84 $% 96,506 1,140.970 71 7% 0 226286 72.5% 0 0 O.0% I TI.l-18 1.~41,224 58 I% % Variance NA NA NA NA NA Lihrar) Impact Fee,~ ]ntcre,t Cam', Rc~ cnuc Rcscr', ¢ To~al Revenue: Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr Budget Budget Budget Encumbrances Ex pa./Re'*. Budget Variance 2 955.2,'u) 3. ] ~,'.~ ~,;, 2.q,99.42.~ 17.4% NA Roads- Gas Tax (313) Expenditures Non-Projecl E',ps Project Expenses Tfr~ Debt Toul ee Local Opfiun Gas Tax Se Local Option Ct, Tax Constitutional Gas Tax (20%) Constitutional Gas Tax Count' Gas Tas (7th Cent) Voted Gal Tax (9th Cent) Interest Tfrs Olher Ca~ Fo~ ard Total Ro enuc Adopled Amended 3rd Qtr Budget Budget Budget 334.200 350.400 N a. I $.-~ 16.0("'~ lc).413.$e4 N A 1.2)').2(~ 1.229.2~ N A I?C'l.~~) 2.SaS.St3 N A .' ~4.4/. ~ 2~ .349.2 'q N A Y-T-D Y-T-D Encumbrance,, .... E ~.p$.,'Re,,. 0 334.240 1,509,366 2,698.?03 0 1.158,106 0 0 l ..< 09.366 4.191 ,O-lq Adopled Amended 3rd Qtr Budget Budget Budget 5,041JOO $,0.41JOO 3,609.57 I 4,059,0OO 4,089,000 605,900 605.900 46,l,30~ 1,712.000 I,?l 1,000 1,13S,056 1.19~,800 1,191.$OO 610,400 610,400 287,9~6 · 163030 463.000 23 I.~ I.~5C, 181.6OO 90.gOO 509.'0~ 10,2 ~4.~ 79 10,2 ~4.66q Y-T-D Y-T-D Encumbrances £apa./Re%. 1B,T,~4.4r~2 23,549.27q 19.934. I I 7 0 20.840.913 e/. of Budget 95 4'. N 119% N A 93 5% N A 00% 178% NA % of % Budget %'artance lO.g% 9.2% 73.0% 1.7% 76J% 0.0% 68.2% 1.9% 73.$% M.6% I 1.4% 10b I',i 7~ .~/0 25 0% I~,, 0~,~ N/A N 'A 885% 3~.~ - -- "AGE'NDA ITEM No. .q( / / SEP 151998 [ CAPITAL I.MPROVEMENT PROGIL-k.M (CIP) (Continued) Roads - Impact Fees (331 - 340) / ~pendltur~ Non-Prcgecc ProJect Expenses Tfr$. Debt Reserves To~l Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr Budget Budget Budget 16,300.Offf) 19.66b.046 N A 0 0 NA 4.726J00 7.015.127 N A 21.226.5¢X~ 26.8g1.173 N A Y*T*D Y-T-D % of % Encumbrances rzpta'Rr~,, Budget Variance 0 86,573 41 3% N A I.~b.416 2.079,987 106% NA 0 0 N'A NA 0 0 OO% 1.446.416 2.166.560 8.1%. NA Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr Budget Budget Budgel 5,853,300 S,M$3JO0 4.319,975 808.~00 SOIL400 606.300 201 .~,0 201.~0 201.~ I ~.~,~,'~, 20.351.1-3 20.351,1~4 (323.3,K,) (333.3~} 0 0 27,402.441 101 9% % Variance 28.3% 22.6°° 78% 0 0~, N& EMS Impact Fees (350) Exp~ nditures Non-ProJect E,.ps Project Expenses T frs D~bt S~ c Reser,.'es Total Expenses Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr Y.T.D *~'-T-D % of % Budge! Budge( Budget Encumbra~e~ rzptdRe,~. Budget Variance 0 0 NA 219.0OO 342.641 N A 0 0 NA 560.400 463,600 N A 779.400 806.241 N A 0 0 N ~A N A 179.922 13-1.951 39 4,. N A 0 0 N,A N A 0 0 0~', N A 1':,9.922 134,951 16 ?% N A EMS Impac~ Fe,~ lnlcrest Cart). For~.~rd Total Re~ enue Adopted Amended 3rd Budget Budgel Budget 275.000 275,0OO 206.250 27,100 27,100 20325 492,..100 510.24 I 629.86 I (15.1001 (15.1001 0 ?:g,400 806.241 856,4.16 Y-T-D Y-T-D % of Encumbrances Em p~dRe,,. Budget nra 427.337 155.4% N A 20.423 1086',/, N A 620.861 121.3% X A 0 NA 0 1.086,621 134 8% Variance 80.4% 00% NA 2~1 AGENDA ITEM No. ~,/ SEP 1 5.1998 69,,i CAPITAL IMPROVE.MENT PROGRAM (CIP) (Continued) Water System Development Fees (411 ) r%penditures Non-Pro!ecl Exps ProJeCt Expense> '[ t't~, Dew $',c Reset', es Toul Exl~nses '~Vater Impact Fees User Fees {Transfers) Interest .Misc. Tfrs O:hcr Funds Carry. Fon~ ard Toul Re~ enue Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr Budget Budget Budget Y.T-D %'-T-D % of Encumbrances ExpsdRev. Budget Variance 791.800 651.195 N'A 9.157 1'.459.1CA1 15,g99.374 N'A 12.a26.430 0 151.goo NA 0 2.160.$0r~ ~.742.613 N A 0 20,411.'tx~ ...5a4.~8. N A 12.435,58: Adopted Amende¢ 3rd Qtr Y.T-D Budget Budltet Budltet Encumbrances 2,900.000 2,900,000 2.175.000 NIA 6,062,900 6.0~2.900 0 NIA 47~.5OO 475.S00 356.6:'.~ N'A ..0,4.~00 0 N A ¢ ] 65 ,~t~i,I { 165.$001 0 N A 20.411 ."0(~ 2:54.4.q$2 13.'32,$0' 0 I~.g79 3.1% N A 2.436.225 12 ~o NA 0 0 0% NA 0 0O% N A 2.456.204 109~, N A Y-T-D % of ExpsdRe~. Budget Variance 3,19S,19S 110.2% 3S.2% 0 N/A l~i/A 0 NA NA 11.201 .I 82 I00 0% 0 0% O N' -\ N 14.831.61~ 6S 8% 4 Wastewater System Development Fees (413) Expendilures .','on-Project Exps Project Expenses Tfrs Debt S~c Reser~ es Total Expenses Waste~ater ]mpact Fees lmtrest Misc, Loan Proceeds CarD. For~ ard Rcvcnue ,R e~ r,. e Toul Rex enue Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr Y-T-D Budget Budget Budget Encumbrances I .b~ 8.'06 1.396.195 N A 9. I $ 7 20.260.906 27.283.667 N A 295.975 0 30~.7~ N A 0 3.818.8~3 ~.451.052 N. A 0 31.768.4~ 36.435.214 N A 305. 130 Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr Y-T-D Budget Budget Budge! Encumbrnnces 4,400,000 4,400,000 3.100.000 NIA 353.600 353.600 265.200 N/A 20.000.000 20.000.000 0 N.A 7.252.500 I ] ,919,314 11.919..114 N'A (237.70Oi ~237.?0Oj 0 N,A 31.7og.40(, 36.435.214 15.48.1,514 0 Y-T-D % of % £xPs-~Res. ...Budgel~ , Variance 116.731 8.4% N A 492.444 } $~; N A ~.6~ 14.7% N A ..... 0 0.~,~ N 'A 65~.839 1,8% N.A Y-T-D % of % lea psdRev. Budge! %'aria ace 4J75,460 110.1% 35.1% 468.478 132 5% 0 N'A N A 11.919.314 1000"., _ 0 N,A NA 17.26.1,252 47 4% 4 ~'. AGEND~ ITEM No. / SEP 1 5 1998 ,,63 COUNTY WATER & SEWER DISTRICT FUND (408) Fund Summary Fund Totals Aporooriatig~ Public Works Admin. Utilincs Finance Admin. Wastc~ atcr ~crations Water ~cra[mns Tra~fcws' M~sc. Subto;al' R ~cn ~ Se~er U~er ~hcr Sc~ Rexcnue Water User ~her Water R~ cnue T=~f~ Rcimbun~men~ Sublo~l: Ca~' Fo~ ard Rcv~uc Total Rcvcnuc: COUNTY WATER & SEWER DISTRICT FUND (408) 3RD QTR FY 98 EXPENDITURES Amended Budget 3rd Qtr Budget Jrd Qtr Y-T-D 20,000,000 18.000.000 16,000,000 14.0043.000 12.000,000 I 0,000.000 8,000,000 4 2,000 0 Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr % of % Budget Budget Budget Y-T-D Budget Variance 587,700 3.$27,$00 9,046.800 7.873.200 19,896,000 41.231,500 9.987.200 51,218,700 18.869.000 846.200 ! 6.759.000 525,000 $34.200 82.800 183.100 38.099.300 15.020.200 ( 1,900,800} 51,218.700 683,544 4,087.800 9,456,827 8,084.035 19.896,000 42,208.206 9.250,058 51,458,264 18,869,000 846.200 16,759,000 525,000 834.200 82.800 183.100 38,099.300 15.259.764 ( 1,900.800~ 51,458.264 505.270 3.634,250 7,017,650 5.996,300 7,295.489 24.448,959 0 24,448,959 14340,440 634.650 12,904,430 393.750 625,650 45,300 137,325 29,081.545 22,465.342 0 51,546,887 419,475 61.4% - 12,6% 3.576.293 87,5% -I,4%, 5.839.925 61.8% - 12,5% 5.405,036 66.9% -7.3% 7,295.489 36.7% 0.0% 22.536,218 53.4;,, -4.5% 0 00% N A 22,536.21 $ 43 8% -3.7% 15,173,955 80.4% 4.4% 406,244 48.0% -27.~; 13,b4&717 81.4% 4.4% 570,141 108.6% 33.6%, 828,614 99.3% 243% 45.300 54.7% 0.0% 81,550 44.5 ~; 30.752.521 80.7% 4.4% 22.465.342 147.2% 0.0% 0 0,0% N 'A 53.217.863 COUNTY WATER & SEWER DISTRICT FUND (408) Fund Summary (Continued) EXPLA~NATION OF VARIANCES Revenue Other Sewer Revenue: This primarily consists of reuse irrigation revenues. This is a relatively new revenue source and there is not a great deal of data from which to predict furore receipts. Interest '.Miscellaneous: This includes unbudgeted items such as radio tower lease and penalties on past due accounts. AGENDA ITEM No. SEP 1 5 19~8 I SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FUND (470) Fund Summary SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL FUND (470) 3RD QTR FY 98 EXPENDITURES Amended Budgel 3rd Qtr Budget 3rd Qtr Y-T-D 9,000,000 8.000.000 7,000,000 6,000,000 5.000,000 4,000,000 3,000,000 2.000,000 0 Fund Totals Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr % of % Budget Budget Budget Y-T-D Budget Variance Approuriafiofl$ Personal Ser~ Ices 344.500 344,500 251,830 252,421 73.3% 0.2% Operaung 7.613.600 8.303,788 6,228.616 5.326.984 6-1.2% - 10.9% Capital Outlay 39.000 43.272 33,522 29,262 67.6% -9.8% Transfers 0 0 0 0 N/A N,'A Contributions 49.300 49,300 49,300 49,300 100,0% 0.0% Subxotal: 8,046,400 8,740,860 6,563.268 5.657,967 64.7% -10.4% Reserves 12.295,900 12,018,884 0 0 0.0% N/A Total Fxpend~tures: 20.342.300 20,759.744 6,563.268 5,657,967 27.3% -4.4% Revenues Landfill Fees 6,261,400 6,261,400 4,696,050 5,272,870 Tlr Mandatory Coll. 1,698,100 1,698,100 1,273,575 1,273,575 Interest 652.600 652,600 489,450 490.3 17 M iscel laneous 152,8t~ ) 152,800 114,600 156,776 Subtotal: 8,764,900 8,764,900 6.573.675 7,193,538 CarD.' For'v,'ard 11,930,7)0 12,348,144 12,854,090 12,854,090 Revenue Reserve (353..~.. 0) (353,300) 0 0 Total Revenue: 20,342,300 20,759,744 19,427,765 20,047,628 84.2% 9.2% 75.0% 0.0% 75.1% 0.1% 102.6% 27.6% 82.1% 7.1% 104.1% 0.0% 0.0% N;A 96.6% 3.0% Revenues EXPLANATION OF VARIANCES Based on year-to-date landfill tipping fees, a large surplus is projected from t~ AGENDA ITEM EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES FUND (490) Fund Summary EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES FUND (490) 3RD QTR FY 98 EXPENDITURES Amended Budge~ 3rd Qtr Budget 3rd Q~r Y-T-D Personal Services Operating Capital Outlay Transfers Fund Totals Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr Budget Budget Budget Y-T-D Appropriation] .,, _ Personal Services 6,253.9C)0 6,413,400 4,688,195 4.815,632 Operating 1.362,400 1.374,430 1,030.823 1.147,082 Capilal Outlay 0 24.600 17.250 22,000 Transfers 2.000 2.000 2.000 2,000 SubEotal: 7,618,300 7,814.430 5,738,268 5,986,714 Reserves 383.300 206.300 0 0 Total Expenditures: 8,001,600 8,020,730 5,738,268 5.986,714 Ambulance Fees 3,465,000 3,465,000 2,460,300 2,285,789 Prior Year Revenue 75,000 75,000 75,000 116,191 Tlr from (001) 3,864.500 3,864.500 3,864,500 3,864,500 Reimb. F~re Districls 34,100 52.900 39,675 38,909 Int erest,'Misc. 38.700 38,700 ] 9,350 15,683 Subtotal: 7.477,300 7.496,100 6,458,825 6.321,072 CarD.' For~'ard 703.200 703,530 1,481,632 1,481,632 Revenue Reserve (I 78.900) (178,900) 0 0 Total Revenues. 8,001,600 8,020,730 7,940,457 7,802,704 7.000,000 6.000,000 5,000,000 4,000.000 3.000.000 2.000,000 1.000.000 0 % of % Budget Variance 75.1% 2.0% 83.5% 85% 89.4% 19.3% 100.0% 0.0% 76.6% 3.2% 0.0% N/A 74.6% 3. 1% 66.0% -5.0% 154.9% 54.9% 100.0% O.0% 73.6% - 1.4% 40.5% -9.5% 84.3% -I.8% 210.6% 0.0% 0.0% N/A EXPLANATION OF VARIANCES Revenues Due to adjustments in Medicaid reimbursements resulting from a State of Florid actual collection ra~e. a shortfall in this revenue source is projected for FY 98. -I.7% AGENDA ITEM No..~.~.__ audit,~ell pg._ AIRPORT AUTHORITY FUND (495) Fund Summary AIRPORT AUTHORITY FUND (495) 3RD QTR FY 98 EXPENDITURES Amended Budget 3rd Q~r Budgel 3rd Qtr Y-T.D 600,000 500.000 400.000 300.000 200.000 100,000 0 Fund Totals AoOropriation~ A P .-\ uthon tv Ad m~ n 379.400 395.068 ,9 l. ~ 0. lmmokalee Regional AP 221.900 228.695 170..104 Everglades A ~rpark 146.S00 ] 5-1.1.15 I t4.492 Marco IsI Exccutl,.e ..\P 514.800 526.043 392.123 Subtotal: 1.262.900 1.304.851 968.720 Reserves 65,000 50,560 0 ~fotal Expenditures 1.327,900 1.355.41 I 968.720 Re, enues Administration 3,000 3,000 2.250 Immokalee Fees 55.t00 55,100 41.325 lmmokalee Fuel 112.500 II 2.500 127.243 Ex crglades Fees 23.400 23.400 17.550 Ex erglades Fuel 50,500 50.500 44,036 Marco Island Fees 66.600 66,600 49.950 Marco Is land Fuel 588.500 588.500 613.172 Transfer (001) 322,600 322,600 241,950 Transfer AP Grants 20.000 20,000 15.000 Interest Misc. 8.0tX} 10.308 5,154 Subtotal: 1.250,200 1,252,508 I,I 57,630 Carry Fora ard 123,100 148,303 107,750 Re~ enue Reset,, e (45.400) (45.400) 0 Total Revenue: 1.327.900 1,355.411 1.265.380 -' Adopted Amended 3rd Qtr 3rd Qtr % of Budge! Budgel Budget Y-T-D Budget Variance 271,912 687% -5 0% 128.577 56.2'.0 -Ig 3?° 06.003 62 3% -12 0'% 4-12.940 84.2% 9 7% 939.432 7200,; -2 2% 0 0.0% N"A 939,432 693% -2 2% 1.515 50 5% 3S,435 69.8% -5 2°,o 81.123 721% .41 7.225 30.9% -44 I% 25.979 51.4% -35 27,419 41.2% -33 521.350 88.6% · 15 6% 241,950 75.0% 0~/, 15,000 75 .~", 0 8.019 86.5% 36 968.915 77.4% - 15 I 107,750 72.7% 0.0% 0 O. 0% N,'A ] .076.665 79.4% - 13. EX~°LANATION OF VARIANCES ~"'~NDA ITEM Revenues Overall, there is a slight sho~al] projected due to Avgas sales berg forecast at less th the budgeted level. SEP 1 5 1998 Additional Enterprise, Internal Service Trust Funds Marco Water/Sewer District (431) Goodland Water (441) Information Technology (505) Department of Revenue (510) Property & Casualty (516) Group Health (517) Worker's Compensation (518) Fleet Management (521) OCPM (589) Utility Regulation (669) Courts (681) AGENDA ITEM No. SEP 1 5 1998 Pg..i D(~ EXECUTIVE SUMMARy REPORT OF THE AD HOC ETHICS STANDARDS REVIEW COMMITTEE OBJECTIVE; To present a status report within sixty (60) days of the first meeting of the Ethics Standards Review Committee, as required by Resolution 98-186. CONSIDERA, TION: The charge to the Committee is: (1) to review existing laws governing ethics in government, including gift disclosure laws; (2) to review the problems therewith; and (3) to propose suggestions on correcting these problems The Committee, as ~pending three weeks on each of the three areas above, has reached consensus that recommends: (a) enactment of an Ethics Code; (b) instituting misdemeanor penalties for ethics violations to enable speedier resolution; and (c) establishment of a 3-person ethics advisory committee. FISCAL IMPACT: None GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Board of County Commissioners direct the Ethics Standards Review Committee to draft and propose an Ethics Code of Conduct for Collier County. SUBMITTED BY: ~C~~_,,~ ~.~  aw, Chairman Date: AG£NDA ITEM No.. to Ct~"} _ 'l OB,W~CTIVE: To appoint I member to fulfill the remainder of a vacant term, expiring on January 29, 1999, on the Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee. CONSIDERATIObTS~: This 15 member Advisory Committee was established by Ordinance 90- 11 and amended by Ordinance 91-22. The Division provides landscaping services, including all public road maintenance and park areas, street lighting services, aquatic management services, beach cleaning, and the Clam Bay Restoration Project. It is the Division's responsibility to provide the framework of long-term community planning so that residents can enjoy the benefits of Pelican Bay wl'file ensuring both the social a~d financial well-being ofthe Pelican Bay CommuniD'. A list ofthe current membership is included in the backup. Mr. Frederick Flatto submitted his resignation on June 15, 1998. A press release was issued and resumes were received from the following interested citizen: ~PPLICANT CATEGORY Larry. J. Salzman Resident .COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: position be left vacant until January, 1999. D IS.__.~TELECTOR ADV. COMM. 2 yes none The committee is recommending that the _FISCAL IMPACT: NONE GROX,~?I'H blANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE .RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners consider the recommendation for appointment and ifa member is appointed, direct the Count:)' Attorney to prepare a resolution confirming the appointment. Prepared By: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners Agenda Date: SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 SEP 1 5 1998 MEMORANDUM TO: Sue Filson FROM: James P, Ward DATE: September 2, 1998 SUBJECT: Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee Pursuant :o your Memorandum of July 20, 1998, please be advised that the Pelican Bay Advisory Comminee met on August 5, 1998 and discussed the vacant position on the Advisory. Committee. Due to the short period of time a new member would be on the Committee prior to having to re-apply, on a vote of 6 to 2 it was recommended that the position be left vacant until January., 1999. MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: Jul>' 20, 1998 Vinell Hills. Elections Office ~3UoearFdi los ~ n~ oAu~d~ i~i:t ratdi'~ i oAnS~irSst an Voter Registration - Advisory Board Appointments The Board of Count)' Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment to one of the count)"s advisory commiuees. Please let me know if those listed below are registered voters in Collier Count).'. Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides. PEk BAY MSTBU ADV COMM COMMISSION DISTRICT Larry J. Salzman 804 Pine Village Lane Naples, FL 34108 Thank you for your help. 1998 Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee Nglme Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate 01/14/97 01/29/01 Herbert Hasson 6001 Pelican Bay Blvd., #1602 Naples, FL 34108 District: 2 Categon..: Resident 598-9064 Cornelia K.fie~2h 5964 Pelican l~av Boulevard Naples, FL 341(58 District: 2 Category: Resident Frederick Flat'to 800 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 200 Naples, FL 34108 District: 2 Category: Resident 598-4334 598-3849 02/10/98 01/29/02 2nd Term 4 Years Edward R. Griffith 8191 Lowbank Drive Naples, FL 34109 District: 2 Category: Developer 4 Years Cora P. Oblev 802 Slashpin~ Court Naples, FL 34108 District: 2 Categoo': Resident 03/19/91 01/29/95 4 Years 1/24/95 01/29/99 4 Years 947-2500 01/14/97 01/29/01 Anthony P. Pires 209 Madison Drive Naples, FL 34110 District: 5 Category: Non-Resident/Attorney 591-1802 Maureen McCarthy 6075 Pelican Bay l~lvd., #501 Naples, FL 34168 District: 2 Category: Resident/Financial 4 Years 01/29/91 01/29/95 4 Years 1/24/95 01/29/99 4 Years 5974983 02/02/93 01/29/95 5974983 l/24/95 01/29/99 02/10/98 01/29/02 598-3857 2 Years 4 years 4 Years Page 1 of 3 AGENDA I 'r. FmM No. ~_~.~ SEP 1 5 1998 Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee George H. Wemer 712 Heathery Lane Naples, FL 34108 District: 2 Category: ResidendCAPB Work H, one Appt'd Exp. Date Term Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term 02/02/93 01/29/97 4 Years 566-3361 1/14/97 01/29/01 4 Years Bemon W. Young 6760 Pelican Bay Blvd., #334 Naples, FL 34108 District: 2 Category: ResidendPBPOA 01/29/91 01/29/95 4 Years 598-1785 1/24/95 01/29/99 4 Years John W. Hoyt 5811 Pelican Bay Blvd., #615 Naples, FL 34108 District: 2 Category: Resident/Developer 597-8687 01/29/91 01/29/93 2 Years 597-9666 1/14/97 01/29/01 4 Years James A. Carroll 8430 Abbin~on Circle, C-31 Naples, FL 34108 District: 2 Category: Resident/Engineer 597-9767 02/10/98 01/29/02 4 Years Alan B. Varley 8111 Bay Colony Drive #904 Naples, ~'L 341(38 District: 2 Category: Resident 02/02/93 01/29/97 4 Years 591-3119 1/14/97 01/29/01 4 Years Glen D. Harrell 9589 Crescent Lake Dr. #202 Naples. FL 34109 District: 3 Category: Commercial~q]eveloper 598-1605 02/08/94 01/29/98 4 Years 2/10/98 01/29/02 4 Years Thomas C. Brown 8415 Excalibur Circle B-1 Naples, FL 34108 District: 2 Category: Resident 594-1949 01/24/95 01/29/99 4 Years Tu~day, February 10, 1998 Pa~e 2 of 3 Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term ~ .Name David A. Roellig 594-2210 6000 Pelican Bay Blvd., ~._04 Naples, FL 34108 District: 2 Category: ResidendEngineer This 15 member committee was created by Ord. No. 90-111 and amended by Ord. No. 91-22 and 93-15 to aid and assist the Count'/manager and the Board of County Commissioners in determinig the need and quantity of extraordinary law enforcement in Pelican Bay. Also to aid, assist, and provide input to the County Mana9er and the Board in effecting a smooth and expeditious transfer of street lighting, water management and beautification services, responsibilities and obhgations from the Pelican Bay Improvement District. Terms are 4 years. FL STAT: 125.0l Staff: Jim Ward. Pelican Bay Services Divisicn. 597-1749 AGENDA IT.~M SEP I 5 1998 MEMORANDUM DATE: July 20, 1995 TO: James Ward, Pelican Bay Services Division /~.. /9 FROM: Sue Filson. Administrative Assistant, /~,// ' Board of County Commissioners ~ ' RE: Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisor), Committee As you 'knox,,', v.'e currently have a vacancy on the above-referenced advisory commiuee. A press release was issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your revie',v as follows: Lam' J. Salzman 804 Pine Village Lane Naples, FL 34108 Please let me kno',v, in w'riting, the recommendation for appointment of the advisoo' committee vdthin the 41 da,,,' time-frame, and I ',','ill prepare an executive summary for the Board's consideration. Please categorize the applicants in areas of expertise. If you have an.',' questions, please call me at 774-8097. Thank you for 3'our attention to this matter. SF Attachments o~ SEP 1 5 1998 July 14, 1998 ATTN: ,Mrs. Sue Filson Administrative Assistant BOARD OF COUNTRY COMMISSIONERS FAX: (941) 774-3602 I hereby apply for the vacancy on the Pelican Bay MSTBU Advisory Committee. I have been a resident of Pelican Bay since January 1, 1987· Born: June 9, 1929 in Detroit, Michigan Ed ueation: B.S. Industrial Engineering - Kettering University M.B.A. - Michigan State University Armed Service: Army - Korean War Work Experience: 34years General Motors 23 years Pontiac Motor Division in various engineering and technical positions up to Director of Quality Control. Eleven years Delco Remy Division as Director Reliability and Quality Control. Headed department of approximately 2000 employees with budget dover 50 million dollars. Pelican Bay Experience: Four years as President of the Village at Pelican Bay. Short time on PBID Board prior to county taking control. Currently Board Member, The Club Pelican Bay. Four years as Green and Course Committee Chairman, Thc Club Pelican Bay. I thank you for your consideration. Larry J. Salzman 804 Pine Village Lane Naples, FL 34108 PH. (941) 5984209 AGENDA_ IT~ No SEP 1 5 1998 THE CLUB PELICAN BAY 707 GULl:' PARK DRIVE '" NAPLES. FLORIDA 3.d, f08 * (941) 597.1183 * FAX 19411 59'7-7091 FGF Insurance Group IlEAl.TH * GROUP * I.IFE Juu: 15, 1998 Mr Jim Ward PelIc=n hay Services Dlvi~lotl 801 I, aurel Oak Drive Naple~ Yl 34108 Dear Jim: It has been a unique experience serving with you durl,g the pa~t 6 plus years In my capacity a~ s member of the MSTBU Advisory Board. Recently, my work load has dramatically increased and I find my time for community involvement nece~sartly mu~t decrease. As you know, I am also a member of the Board of the North Naples Property Owners Association, as well as several other equally demandina orgauizatlons, and can nn longer devote the appropriate attention and concern that the MST§U requires. It has been my privilege ~o learn how small communities operate and govern. AS a nativo New Yorker, I was always exposed to the :Big Picture"; it has been a revels:ion to see a smaller No d~,,bt, my presence ~111 be missed, but no more thai1 I shall mis~ all the. energetic, lnvnIved, spirited, ~trong- optnloned people who were my fellnw Board member~. Kindly convey to the Comml~sioner~ my ferrets and my best wlshe~[ Good luck to you in all yuur wonderful endeavors. Cordially, ~reder[ck Flatto CC: Tim Constantine Tim Hancock AGENg~M SEP 5 800 LAUREL OAK. DRIVE, SUITE 200 NAPLES. FLORIDA ~,9963 (8131 596-4334 ,,/UN-22-198 08,21 FROM, Pmltc&n Bay Services ~:~1- ~ r-,.,,.,,.,,~u~ ,,~4.1011 ' one: (~41) ~r/-l?4e · FAX: (;~) ~?.4ao; ID, 941 S97 4502 From:, Phone: Oats: Re: CC: Urgent El For ;ieview Please ~mme~ ~ ;qease Reply AGEND~ IT~-H Nc) SEP ! 5 Fig8 OB~CTI~: To appoint 1 member representing Co~ission Dis~ct 4, to a 3 y~ar t~, cxpi~ng on August 31, 2001, on ~e Emergency Medical Se~ices .._ . .~Adviso~ Co.oil. CONSIDERATIONS: The Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council has 1 term expire on August 3 I, 1998, representing Commission District 4. This 11 member council advises the Board of County Commissioners on all aspects of emergency medical services, including the operational budget, level of service and equipment. Terms are 3 years. A list of the current membership is included in the backup. A press release was issued and resumes were received from the following interested citizens: APPLICANT ,,CATEGORY Michael F. X. Geraghty Comm. District 4 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION: ..DIST ELECTOR ADV. COMM. 4 yes none Michael F.X. Geraght), FISCAL IMPACT: NONE GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: NONE .RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Count)' Commissioners consider the recommendation for appointment and appoint 1 member to the Emergency Medical Services Advisory. Council, and direct the County. Attorney to prepare a resolution confirming the appointments. Prepared By: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County. Commissioners Agenda Date: SEPTEMBER 15, 1998 SEP 15 lgg8 TO: FROM: DATE: REF: bl EM ORA N Dr' Sue Filson, Administrator Assistant Board of County ~oners Diane B. Flagg. Chief Emergency Services Depar'fr~6n~ August 27, 1998 District #4 Vacancy Emergency Medical SeN'ices Advisory Council 'Four continued assistance and cooperation in processing Emeruency Services Advisory Council candidates fbr the Advisory Council members consideration is greatly appreciated The Emergency Nledical Services Advisory Council mci this ~.~eek and has recommended Ibr the Board oFCounty Commissioners consideration. Mr Michae]FX Gerauhv for the' District ~4 vacancy Mr. Geraghy's background and interest in serving on theOl,.IS Ad,.'isorv Council lead to their recomrnendaticH'~ lf l may off'er an,.' additional information, please do not hesitate to contact my o[t~ce 'I'hanks a,__,ain fi~r your continued expertise AGENDA ITEM NO..~__~ SEP 1 5 /998 MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: June 22, 1998 Vinell Hills. Elections Office Sue Filson. Administrative Assistap. t/-/51 Board of County Commissioners RE: Voter Registration - Advisor>.' Board Appointments The Board of Count.',' Commissioners will soon consider the following individuals for appointment to one of the county's advisoo' committees. Please let me 'know if those listed below are registered voters in Collier County. Also, please list the commission district in which each applicant resides. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ADV COMM COMMISSION DISTRICT Michael F.X. Geraghty ,? ~ 935 Hieh Point Drive '~'~f'-"~ Naples, FL 34103 Thank you for your help. AGE ND~'I[E M No. SEP 1 5 1998 IVame Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council Work Phone Appt'd Exp. Date Term Home Phone DateRe-appt 2ndExpDate 2nd Term Robert D. Laird 1765 Courtyard Way, 205-C Naples, FL 34112 District: 1 Category: At-Large 11/01/94 08/31,'97 3 Years 793-0933 9/23/97 8/3 I.,'00 3 Years George T. Lemon 7024 Trail Boulevard Naples, FL 34108 District: 2 Category: At-Large 263-7002 09123/97 08!31/00 3 Years Fa.,,' R. Biles 1588 Heights Cot.tn Marco Island. FL 34145 District: I Category: Commission District 394-3089 09/17~96 08/31/99 3 Yem's Rhona E. Saunders 3770 Parkview \Vav Naples, FL 34103 District: 4 Categoo': Commission District 01/04/94 08/31 '95 1,5 Years 434-9230 6/20/95 08:31 98 3 Years This 11 member committee was created by Ord. No, 80-80 to advise the Board of County Commissioners on all aspects of emergency medical services in Collier County, including the operational budget, level of service and equipment. This committee also reviews complaints and problems and recommends corrective action. Terms are 3 years. FL STAT: Staff: Diane Fiagg, Emergency Medical Services Director: 774-8459 Wednesday, January 14, 1998 Page 2 of 2 AGEND& I~EM uo, //Or"'" SEP 1 5 1998 Pg. MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: June 22, 1998 Diane Flagg, Emergency Medical ~rector Sue Filson, Administrative Assistan}.///...'/ , Board of County Commissioners ~. Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council As you know, we currently have 1 vacancy on the above-referenced advisory comminee. A press release ,.,,'as issued requesting citizens interested in serving on this committee to submit a resume for consideration. I have attached the resumes received for your review as follows: Michael F.X. Geraght2:' 935 High Point Drive Naples, FL 34103 Please let me 'knox,,', in writing, the recommendation for appointment of the advisory commiue.e within the 41 day time-frame, and I will prepare an executive summary for the Board's consideration. Please categorize the applicants in areas of expertise. If you have any questions, please call me at 774-8097. Thank you for .,,'our attention to this matter. SF Attachments 935 High Point Drive Naples, FL 34103 THE FAMILY INSTITUTE Michael F.X. Geraghty, Ph.D Licensed Psychologist Tel: Fax. (941) 261-3756 (941) 261-7791 June 16, 1998 Ms. Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant Board of County Commissioners 3301 Tamiami Trail E. Naples, FL 34112 Dear Ms. Filson: I am interested in serving as a board member on one of the following Advisory Boards. /' Black Affairs Advisory Board 2.. Emergency Medical Service Advisory Council Enclosed is a copy of my resume. I am cutting back on my psychological practice and believe I could help out the community by serving on one of these boards. Each one of the boards holds a special interest to me; and since I have been in the community for over 25 years, I have followed their progress. The enclosed resume gives some details of my experience in the county. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, No. SEP 1 5 1998 935 High Point Drive Naples. FL 34103 MICHAEL F.X. GERAGHTY, Ph.D, Licensed Psychologis~ 941-261-3756 Florida License PYOOO4604 CURRICULUM VITAE EDUCATION i 986 1968 1965 Ph.D. Clinical P~'choloD' - School of P~'choloD'. Florida Institute of TechnoloD'. Melbourne, Florida. M.A. Family Sociology - Graduate Faculty of Political and Social Science. New School for Social Research. New York. New York. B.A. Economics (Honors) - Long Island University. New York. New York. EXPERIENCE 1991- 1979- 1974- 19~5-1989 1983-1984 1983 1974-1979 Co-Founder and Director, Resource institute. Naples, Florida. Resource Institute. a sen-ice group, specializes in teaching skills to bnng about positive change and grm~l.h by conducting training seminars and workshops in professional and personal dc~'elopmcnl. Founder and Director of The Family Institute, Inc. Family practice includes ~'aluation and assessment, counseling and ps3.'chotherapy with children and adults and groups' school consultations: seminars, workshops, organizational and business consultations in mental health and human relations: pemonnel evaluation and testing: managemenl and human organizations consultations. Adjuncl Professor. Edison Commum,ty College, Naples, Florida. PsycholoD'. Sociology and Amhropology courses. Mamage and Family Studies, Human Relations in Business and Indus-tn.'. Clinical Ps'2,.'chologist (Part-time). Praclice included individual, couples and family psychotherapy and group therapy, assessment and evaluation. Ro~rt J. Wald & Associates, Naples, Florida. Clinical Psychologist (Intern). Psychotherapy, assessment and evaluation - children and adults. Lee Mental Health Center, Ft. Myers, Florida. Clinical Psychologist (Intern). Brcvard Mental Health Center, Rockledge. Florida. Executive DireO. or. Fully responsible for the operation of the Center, resp Directors. David La,,s-mnce Mental Health Center, Inc., Naples, Florida. Psychotherapy, assessment and evaluation - chilctren and adults. NO, ~__{~:~.~ SEP 1 5 1 98 Michael F.X. Geraghty. Ph.D. Vita - Page 2 1973-1974 Associate Director. Responsible for Subslance Abuse Program. and Program Planning and Evaluation. Collier Count?.' Mental Health Center. Inc.. Naples. Florida. 1970-1973 Program Consultant. Community Mental Health. Alcohol and Drug Abuse Sen'ices - private and governmental agencies. 1968-1973 Ins-tru~or. Department of Sociology and Anthropolo~..', Cedar Cresl College. Allentown. Perms2,.ivarfia. 1971-1972 Sociologifl. Project Director - Studies in Social Ecology. Fahkahalchee Environmental Studies Center. G-cxxllanct. Florida. 1969 1968 1968 Lecturer in Anthropolog3'. Graduate School. Lehigh Universi~-. Bethlehem. Pennsylvania. lns-truclor in Sociology. Moravian College. Bethlehem. Penn~..ivania. Human Resources Developmcnl Staff. New York Slate Department of Labor. New York Cip,.'. NY. Previous to 1968: Teaching. research and consulting for such agencies and organizauons as Meuopolitan Life Insurance Company. Long lsland Universny. New York Oakite Products. lnc.. American Mem. l Climax. Inc. PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS American Psychological Association Florida Psychologica! Association Florida Anthropological Association Florida Association of Alcohol and Drug Abuse National Association of Alcoholism & Drug Abuse Counselors Sociep,.' for Professional Well-Being Suncoasl Psychoanal)lic Sociep,., South Florida Psychoanal.~xic Society RELATED ACTIVITIES Alliance for the Mentally I11. National and Collier Cotm~.' Chapter - Member Calusa Chapter, Florida P~'chological Association - Past President Project Help (Crisis Intervention Center and Hotline), Naples. Florida, Executive Board Member Collier Coun .fy Mental Health Association. Inc. - Member MILITARY SERVICE 1957-1959 Uniled States Navy. Honorable Discharge AGE ND~,.~IT.~EM SEP 1 5 1998 l lemo Through: From: Date: The Honorable Barbara B. Berry, Chairman, and Commissioner, District 5 Robert F. Fernandez, County Administrator//~ Ilschner, Public Works Administratorfi~"- Ed August 31, 1998 Subject: Immokalee Road Safety Improvement Schedule and Potential for Ultimate Four-lane Improvement In response to your request for information concerning how to make improvements to 4~rnokzJcc Road that would address the safety issues that have become apparent over the last several years, we are offering the follovdng information we believe will prove useful to you. The widening of Immokalee Road to four lanes from 1-75 to CR 951 is on schedule. As you may recall, we recently received permission from the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) to revise the construction drawings to reflect an ultimate six-lane urban arterial cross-section. 'We are now nearing 60% completion of the construction plans. R/ght--of-way acquisition is proceeding on a schedd: ,.hat should enable the bidding of this project in late December 1998 or early January 1999. If all goes well, we should be under consmaction by April 1999. It will take approximately t~vo years to complete this roadway improvement. We have included funds in the FY 98-99 budget for intersection widerfing and traffic signal improvements at Immokalee Road and Wilson Boulevard. The project schedule indicates that it will take approximately eight months to complete the permitting and engineering for this improvement. Once this work is complete, it will take an additional 60 to 90 days to complete the project. Therefore, it is anticipated that a traffic signal at Wilson Boulevard will be operational by September 1999. Begin. n/rig witi~ the FY 1999 budgeL the Trm'Lqx)rtation Sen'ices Deparanent has requested approval of a project designated as the Shoulder Safety Program (Project No. 69122) specifically designed to address the bnmokalee Road safety issue. It is to be funded at a level of $500,000 per year over the nex-t five fiscal years. _ AGENDA ITEM '~' t~.. .... SEP15 The intent of this project is to provide for various safety improvements along Immokalee Road from CR 951 all the way to SR 29 in the center of Immokalee. Among the improvements anticipated be the follo,a~g: · · [] I · · Addition of shoulders along, both sides of the mad Placement and replacement of guard railing where warranted Improved pavement markings l. mproved off-mad obstruction mm-kings Improved culvert crossings where necessary and permitted Intersection sa.lev improvements (turn lanes, etc.) We recognize that the extensive length of Immokalee Road necessitates the need to break this effort into several phases spread over a period of' no less than five yea~ and consistent with the availability of funds to support it. Our initial effort ,.,,'ill include the engineering design, and permitting where necessary, for the entire len~w,.h of the roadway. The project is planned for separation into the following project phases or construction segments and submitted to the Board of Count).' Commissioners on an annual basis as part of the budget process. [] [] [] CR 951 to Wilson Boulevard Wilson Boulevard to Sanctuary Road Sanctuary. Road to Range line 28/29 Ra. nge line 28/29 to SR 29 The final project schedule and its associated funding requirements will be determined after the engineering is complete. This project is unique in that each culvert crossing and each project phase or segment of roadway must be examined for environmental requirements and obstruction improvements, which may or may not require permitting. At the July 31, 1998 Meu'opolitan Planning Organization ('M?O) meeting, the MPO adopted its 1998 list of Unfunded Priorities (see attachment 1), for submission to the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). This list of projects is used by the FDOT in the upcoming five (5) year Work Program development cycle. The only segment of Immokalee Road to show up on the Adopted 1998 Unfunded Priorities list is item 16. six-laning lmmokalee Road from L:.S. 41 to Goodlette-Frank Road. Historically, tmfunded priorities ,,*,'ere usually on the State H. ighway System. Now, as a result of ISTEA, a greater flexibility for the use of federal and ~a~e funds would allow the programming of these fi.rods for major County-owned urban arterials such as Immokalee Road. However, federal and state policy continues to require that project priorities be consistent w/th a Long Range T~rtafion Plan (LRTP), that shows tratcss~ortation facilities needed to serve a predicted population. Federal and state statutes also require there to be consistency between the LRTP, the road needs shown in the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan (TE-GMP), and the annually adopted Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) that contains the state, county, and city. work programs. A project not shown in the LRTP would require a plan amendment before it could be added to either the state's work program or the county's Capital Improvement Ph J:~L~.._.~erefore. ~'' : r 'DA iTE~A SEP 5 :he ctz-r, en: 291:': FLn~nci~l.v Feasible Plat i_: g',e menu of'transportation improvements from which the corm-:.~uniq, re. al, ch,~se ~o add to thcL- work pre, ge,ams. Curr. entl.~, tko 2,~!0 Financially Fe~i~;~' ?!~", (amended Februar2:' 1998) depicts Immokalce Road from 1-73 to CF', 951 ,~ a four-lane facitit.~. T'ne 2020 LRTP Needs Plan identifies this segment as an ul~na:e sLx-iv~,e :'acitin'. Isnmokalee Road from CR 9.51 to CR 858 is depicted as a two lane facility in '&e 2010 Fin~,ciall.',7 Feasible Plan and ~ a four-lane facility in the Needs Plan. To designate the Immokalec Road segment from CR_qSi to Wilson Boulevard as a four-lane facility would be i.nconsis~ent with ,.he current 2010 F[v. mncialiy_Feasible Plan. However, the MPO will have the oppornmi,",' to reconsider road lane calls for addition,rd lmmokalee Road seg;rnents from CR 951 to SR 29 dur~m,-"~:e LRT? update scheduled for completion by Janum'9.' 2000. The LRTP update will adg-ess e-xp!osi,.'e a', ov,'th along the corridor' ~d the possible need to four-lane additional segments of Immokale~' Road.-C'~e LRTP update ,.,.ii! ~dso necessitate an amendment to the Growth Management Plan Tr&nsoortation Element to ensu~-e consistency. The 2010 Interim Year 2010 Financially Feasible Plan as mmended Febru2,~"3.' 1998 is a':~c;~.e.~ v_~ .-\t'~ac}'wnents 2 and 3. In addition te :ot~ir. ency requirements, seato mhd count3.' regulations state th,at when a road segment's Level of' Service &OS)is deemed deEci::~, consz'ucfion ~at xsSll provide relJefmust be scheduled to corranence v,'%i-dn :.}'a'ee ve~,'s. If it doest: :-.or s'~.r"_ then the count')' can no longer issue development orders ',,.-i'3.qin a zone around the road _~r. ment c~led the area of significant influence (ASI). The coum'.' chooses 5e adopted lex'et of se.'-~"ize (LOS't that is to be maintained on its roads with the exception cf inte."s:.at¢ 75 in Collier Counts'. The LOS chosen for Immokalee Road is LOS D. The GMP states ti,at it is the county's imc~t:ion to have a project under construction and pending completion ~':.' ,&e time a road se?,ez: reazhes a deficient condition. Given the amount of time required to do thaL each ,,'ear the .',.~'O ~q,a. ff develops new predictions of when counted traffic volumes ,.,,'iii e::s.'x~J adopted LOS smn..dxd service volumes for all road segments contained in the Annual Update ~d hnventory Report (ALi'R). The attached Count.'.' transportation P!an.~"',g Database provides base data for the AUIR. It is included as At"~cbanen: 4. [n-wnokalee Road s%m'r, ents are listed as ID~6 through ID~ISI. In addition, there are two traffic co",.m~ projection grapM for Immokalee road segment ~tt49 (CR 951 to Wilson Boulevard~ a=,d =50 (\Vilson Boulevard to CR 858) auached (See Attachments 5 and 6). As can be seen on the datab~ sp:,eadsheet and the tra~c count graphs. ~he Immokalee Road segment from CR 951 to \\'ilson Boulevard is expec:ed to be deficient in the ,,'ear 2002. The segment oflmmokalee Road from \Viison Boulevard to CR 85g $~511 not be deficient based on current projection until beyond the .,,,ear 2007. In surru-na.~, the Immokalee Road segnent from 1-75 to CR 951 is identified as a four-lane facility in the 2010 F'inancially Feasible Plan and the currently planned roadway improvements are consistent and address the e.<i~Sng ALFIR deficiency. Based on predicted traffic volumes the Immokalee Road segment from CR 951 to Wilson Boulevard is expected to be deficient by the year 2002. To meet' concurrenc.'., it ,.,,4.5 be. necessar>.' to begin cons-'c'uction v,'itNn three years on this segment of Immoka!ee Road. In order to add this projec~ to the coun'o."s CIP or the State's work program, the . w LRTP md the Tw=,.sportation Element of the G~,W would require amendment to s~.o a fou.--!ane road. To pro,am this improvemc=[ using the State Surface Transponfion ogram t= 1 r! SEP 15 · funds would require that the project be elevated to a point near the top of the Adopted Unfi.mded Priorities list. It is important to keep in mind the fact that it would be approxS, rnately ten .','ears fi'om the time the project appears at the top of the un~ded prioriD' list for it to be under construction. FDOT t2:'pically reserves eight >'ears for project progrzmm~g. To make these changes and quali~' for STP funds, it would be necessary to present this change to the Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). of the N'[PO, the Citizens Advisor)' Committee (CAC) ofthe MPO, and then to the MPO for approval prior to submittal to the FDOT. Based on the eight-year time fi-m'ne to achieve STP funding and the fact that deficiency will occur in less than four y~ (2002). another alternative for funding the deficient section from CR 951 to "~"fl.son Boulevard should be considered. Based on the data indicating deficiency, this section of Immokalee Road will be addressed in the coun~"s standard AUIR process. Therefore, no initiating action ,,,rill be necessary, on the part of the BCC. In November 1998, staff wil.l present the AUIR containing a recommendation that the section of lmmokalee Road from CR 951 to Wilson Boulevard be moved to a higher priority. Staff will request BCC direction and authorization to proceed with the steps necessary, to ensure that the roadway is under construction by no later than the year 2002. Staff ,.,,'ill also inform the BCC of the appropriate funding sources to accomplish the task. After BCC approval is obtained, the staff will then take action to amend the TE-GNW, LRTP, and the CIP to reflect this need and include it in the CIE for the FY994)0 budget process. This alternative would be based on local funding only with the most likely sources being Road Impact Fee and Gas Tax funds. The safety improvements detailed in th. is memo for the remainder of the Lmmokalee Road se_m'nents beyond CR 858 should be sufficient to pro'~'ide adequme travel comfort and sa.feD' to the traveling public over the li.fe of the plan. However, the Boa.rd of County. Commissioners may alter the plan based on the policy direction ofthe Board. Th.is is known as a policy constrained or directed element of the LRTP and TE-GMP. If the Board decided to provide policy direction to stuff that resulted in these remaining sections becoming four-lanes, then t~ere are additional improvements that can be pro'~'ided. As an example, all drivewavs not serving single-family dwellings wotfld be required to have right turn lanes to be consistent with existing count:,.' ordinances, in addition, there would be oppommities to pro,~ide aesthetic enl'm, ncements on a four-lane section that are not available to a standard two-lane section. Of course, along with these eraMncements comes significant additional cost. The Board also has the option to establish policy direction to stuff that would result in the develepment ora two-lane enhanced cti'.4ded road section from CR 858 to SR 29. This .type ofsection would also increase the cost of improvements well over the level of the current safeu' improvement plan detailed above, but would provide for rum lanes and a median without reqmrmg significant additional pavement. The same procedures used to accomplish the amendments to the LRTP and TE- GMP would be required. We hope this information will be useful to you in answering public inquiries regarding efforts to improve the safe .ty of lmmokalee Road. If you have any questions or require additional information. please let us knox,.' and we will be glad to provide any assistance we can. cc: Edward J. Kant. P.E., Transportation Service's Director Richard Hellriegel. Interim Disector. Public ",Vork.s Engineering Depa.,-tment Kenneth Heathering'ton, .~dCP, MPO Director ""--'"-" -'-'---" /-. :',£: .2,.:, iT~.~ (::;r-~, ,; .- ...', ATTACDOtE,N'~ 2 I Countywide Permanent Population 348,100 opulation 3&8,100 i -) o t .ii II I I ! , · · ' ' , i CT'; i 992 1993 1994 199,5 199~ 1997 1998 1999 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 AADT -I EXECUTIVE SUMMARy APPROVE CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 TO CONTRACT NO. 97-2696, SOUTH COUNTY REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT ODOR CONTROL SYSTEM, PROJECT NO. 70020. OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners, as the Ex-Officio Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District, approve Change Order No. 3 for new work at the recently completed South County Regional Water Treatment Plant (SCRWTP) Odor Control System. ~CONSI.DERATIONS:_ On August 26, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners approved awarding Contract No. 97-2696 to Cardinal Contractors, Inc. in the amount of $1,127,500.00. Change Order No. 3 will add instrumentation and controls, add electrical communication connection to the Main Control Room, add additional degasifier openings to provide operational reliability at high flow conditions, add aluminum ladders at the bypass outlets, add sumps and drains at the chemical fill pipes, and add new piping. All the new work proposed will enhance operations at the SCRWTP. Most of the new work items proposed here were not included in the original design as it would have held up starting up the project within the schedule set. The original plan was to do the proposed new work items in the next fiscal year under a new contract. Cardinal has completed construction of the Odor Control System on schedule and it had a successful start-up. The recommended approach is to let Cardinal Contractors complete the new work now as Change Order No. 3 under the current contract. It is requested that the contract amount be adjusted as follows to account for this additional work: Original Contract Amount Sum of Previous Change Orders (Add) This Change Order Amount (Add) NEW CONTRACT AMOUNT $1,127,500.00 $ 19,962.00 $ 76,921.4O $1,224,383.40 '~. ISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available from Fund 412 (Water Capital) as i'ollows: Amount: $65,000 To: Fund: 412 Cost Center: 273511 Project No.: 70020 Water Capital Combined Water Capital Projects (South County Regional Water Treatment Plant Odor Control) SEP 1 fi 19 8 Executive Summary SCRWTP Odor Control System, Change Order No. 3 Page 2 Additional funds are required. A budget amendment is needed to transfer funds from Fund 412 Reserves for Water Capital Outlay as follows: From: Fund: Cost Center: Object Code' 412 Water Capital 919010 Reserves 993020 Reserves for Water Capital Outlay Amount' To: $76,921.40 - $65,000 = $11,921.40 Fund: 412 Water Capital Cost Center: 273511 Combined Water Capital Projects Project No.: 70020 (South County Regional Water Treatment Plant Odor Control). GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners, as the Ex-Officio governing board of the Collier County Water- Sewer District, approve and authorize the OCPM Director to execute Change Order No. 3 to Contract No. 97-2696 and approve the necessary budget amendment. PREPARED BY: REVIEWED BY: Mohan V. Thampi, P.E., Project Manager Office of Capital Projects Management Richard Hellriegel, P.E., Interim Dir~'c~or DATE: Office of Capital Projects Management Paul Mattausch, Water Director Public Works Division REVIEWED B~DATE: Ed Ilschner, Administrator Public Works Division / r Attachment: Change Order No. 3 with work justification memo dated 8/25/98. MVr:mvt so. SEP ) CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 EXHIBITE CHANGE ORD_~ CONTRACT NO. _ _97-2696 z00~ TO: Keith Pickle_~ Directorr['reasu rer _..--- Ca~dinal Contra. gtors, In.c, P.O. lBox 4297 Saraso.ta, Fi 34230 DATE: Au ustq.~998__ PROJECT NAME:.S_CRVCrP Odor Control,System PROJECT NO,: 70020 Under our AGREEMENT dated August__1_3_, 1997. You hereby are authorized and directed to make accordance with terms and conditions of the Agreement: the following change(s) in FOR THE Sum of: sevepty-six thousand nine h. und_re_d and twenty- one dollars and forty cents ($____7, 6,_92_1.40 ). Original Agreement Amount $_1.127j500,_00 Sum of Previous Changes $~ 1~.962.00 This Change Order (Add) $__ __76,921,40 .. Present Agreement Amount $ 1,224,383.40 The time for completion shall be inqmased, by ._217._ calendar days due to this Change Order. Accordingly, the Contract T~me is now four hunclrecl a.n.d t_hirty-six ~ calendar days. The substantial completion date is ~ovember 30% 1998 and the final completion date is Dece_~b.~r_18% 19_98 . Your acceptance of this Change Order shall constitute a modification to our Agreement and will be performed subject to all the same terms and conditions as contained In our Agreement indicated above, as fully as if the same were repeated in this acceptance. The adjustment, if any, to the Agreement shall constitute a full and final set'dement of any and all claims of the Contractor arising out of or related to the change set forth herein, including claims for impact and delay Clinic: O~'da' No. 3 WS-CA-E-1 S ~tO~DY~t£.~OD 'IY.K I (I~IYD SEP I 5 )998 t,£Z6 S9~ It6 I I'YJ ~1:60 3fLL ~6/10/60 Accepted: ,1998. CONTI:~CTOR: OWNER: CARDINAL CONTRACTORS, INC. B)LL~rFl'reasu rer BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE'COLLIER COUNTY WA'r ER-SEWER DISTRICT Paul M~ttausch, Water Director Public Works By:__ Richard Hellriegel, P.E., Intedm Director Office of Capital Projects Management DESIGN PROFESSIONAL: OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGEMENT Mc)hen V. Thampi, P.E Project Manager Attachment: Cost Proposal dated 8/20/98 from Cardinal Contractors, Inc. (For bb,e by Owner'. Fund: 412 C~t Center;. 273511 Oblect Code: 763100 Project Co<lo; 70020) OtmnF ~ No..1 WS-CA-E-2 I SEP 1 .5 1998 COLLIER COUNTY OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS MANAGEMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: RE: August 25,1998 Paul Mattausch, Water Director Bobb Reeder, Facilities Superintendent, SCRW'rP. Mohan Thampi, P.E., Project Manager SCRWTP Odor Control System Justification for Change Order No. 3 with Cardinal Contractors, Inc. Cardinal has for~'arded a cost proposal dated 8/20/98 to do new work at the SCRWTP Odor Control System. Cardinal has completed all work, since May 15, 1998 as per the original Contract and Change Orders 1 and 2. The contact is still kept open so that the new work proposed can be done. The instrumentation & control (I&C) and electrical work proposed here on Items #1 and #2 were not included in the original design as it was not critical to the Odor Control System operations and would have delayed the construction and bidding of the Odor Control System and not have met the schedule for start-up by April 1998. The plan was to do the I&C in the next fiscal year as a new project. The other work items #3 and ~ ,,,.'ere requested by the Operators as enhancements to the operations of the SCRWTP Odor Control System. Items #5 and #6 are work items recommended by the Engineer. The following describes the main proposed work items: Instrumentation and (yontrol (I&¢) Modifications: This work is to allow the Main Control Room using the Genesis PC Control System to monitor on/off status, pH, ORP, and alarms. The Genesis programming will be done by Water Plant's instrumentation contractor who will connect to wires installed by Cardinal. Other modifications include adding pressure d~'op manometers, and pressure gages for the feed pumps and per tower stage. Jacob's cost to the contractor for the I&C work is $11,475 without fiberglass enclosures. If fiberglass enclosures are required over the 8 recirculation pumps, add another $16,000 to the cost. The decision is to not have the fiberglass enclosures. Cost is $I 1,475.' SCR'~,q'P Odor Control System Change Order No. 3 Justification Memo Pagef of 3 SEP 1 5 Electrical Communications: The proposal dated 8/6/98 from Best Electrical Construction, Cardinal's Contractor, has two items. One is to install the remote hardware including DUTEC I/O systems which costs $7,312. The second is to install a communication cable form this DUTEC system to the Main Control Room and this will cost S8,911. Spare conduits have been already been installed under the road with the Odor Control System, so no drivev,,.ay cutting is required. This work has been coordinated with Rich Wilkins, instrumentation contractor for the Water Department. Install Aluminum Ladder Assembly: This is for the operators have a permanent structure to climb up and remove the bypass slide gate at each. train. Two are required. Cost is 2 x S2,890 = S5,780 as per Cardinal's sub-contractor Al-Fab. install Fiber~:lass Containment Boxes/Sump Drains under Chemical Fill Pipes: Two (2) fiberglass (FRS') containment boxes or sumps about 2' square by 2.5' height are to be installed under the fill pipes each of the r, vo Chemical Storage Tanks. The operators have requested these as it will reduce spill concerns during filling and enhance safety. Each fiberglass containment costs '.,,'ill cost S1,150 each. Cost for two is S2,300. This price does not include installing a 2" drain and sewering it. Fabricate Additional Openings in De~asifiers: Two openings will be built into each of the 4 degasifiers according to the proposal Tl~e reason is that whenever the NCRWTP goes down temporarily as it does a few days ever3, week, a surge condition is caused at the SCRWTP because the wells supplying the North Plant are now sendin~ excess water to the South Plant causing the South Plant degasifiers to overload and f~ood the degasifier openings. These instances ranee from 5 to 15 minutes and sometimes longer. The problem is that flooding the ~egasifiers openings causes the degasifier fiberglass walls to flex in a breathing type motion because of the suction effect. This ,,','all flexing effect has happened before but it is now more pronounced because of the more efficient blowers and ducting when the surge conditions occur. This flexing may weaken some areas of the wall over time or may not. But it is better to be safe than son3,. Installing additional openings above the existing degasifier openings flood level will provide relief from the suction effect and prevent flexing. The proposed openings are 3'L x 6"W with openings which can be bolted closed if desired. 2 each are proposed per degasifier. The cost is $12,176 by Watts, sub-contractor to Cardinal. Pulsation Dampers: The installation of a pulsation damper on the suction side of the chemical feed pumps will reduce pipe vibration and possible pipe breakage. One pipe break did occur. But the pipe vibration was eliminated by adjusting the backpressure valves. For additional reliabilty and enhanced safe~,, it is recommended that two pulsation dampers be installed on the suction side of the pumps. Cost for two are $1,804/each X 2 = $3,608. SCRWTP Odor Control System Change Order No. 3 Justification Memo Page of 3 ~ SEP I 5 1§35 Cardinal has given a detailed breakdown of the costs in the attached fax dated 8/20/98 including the six main elements described above and also piping materials. The total costs include Contractor's labor, sales tax, insurance, overhead and profit. A summary of costs is as follows: 1. Equipment and Labor Costs plus Tax SUB-TOTAL = S65,187.63 2. Bonds and Insurance @ 3% 3. Overhead & Profit @ 15% -- $ 1,955.63 TOTAL = $76,921.40 For detailed breakdown of the S76,921.40 cost, see the attached Cardinal fax proposal dated 8/20/98 with its attachments in Change Order No. 3. Attachments: Change Order No. 3 with Cardinal Contractors, Inc. fax dated 8/20/98 with cost justification proposals from subcontractors-Jacobs, Al-Fab, Watts, and Best Electrical. cc: Karl Boyer, P.E., Senior Project Manager-OCPM R/ch Hellriegel, P.E., Interim Director, OCPM File 70020.05 MVT:mvt SCRWTP Odor Control System Change Order No. 3 Justification Memo Page CARDINAL CONTRACTORS PO BOX 4297 SARASOTA, FL 34230-4297 TRANSMITTAL SHEET 'fo. FRO'a MOHAN THAMPI, PE Bn I. MOORE OFt-'ICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 08/10/98 PAX Nt.'M.~.~. ':'UT.M. NO OF PACE.S INF. I UDIN¢; t;uv~.~ 1-941-774-9370 1 ~¢)N-- .~ U.M~P~ 5~-'~ DEZ'S TELEPHO'qP ~qlzM~.~ 1-941-77~8192 941-951-0451 ~. S~qDL~ F~ NUMBE~ 941-365-9~4 SOLWH COL.'N'TY WWI'P ODOR CON-I'RO[. SYS-I"E.M [] L'~G~NT O FO.~ RI:.~,'I~-w [-] rI.E^SE CO~,~.,-.XT X PLE^Sr-. REPLY [] YL£A$~' RECYCLE MOHAN: ATTACHED IS THE KEVLSF_.D F_.STIMATE I-I~OM BEST Er.ECX-mC. EWD~Y PALL JACOBS HAS SOME INPUT R.EQU1RF. D. ANWWAY, I I~\VE NO IDF_.% WI-L~xT UTE'RF.. DOING, SO GIVE MF. A CALL AN'D WE'LL DISCUSS. ~~ MO O.:~E ST ELE. CTRICA£ CONSTRUCTION, INC. 9300 Henderson Grade Rd. N. Ft. Myers, FI. 33917 License No. EC 0001136 Phnnn 941.731-.6898 Fax 941.731-6190 SEND TO Cardinal Contractors Bill Moore 365-9234 B Urgen t/ B Reply ASAP/ TOTAl. PA~E~. INCLUDING COVER [~leas e CornmenL~ FROM Dave Moskwa 951-0451 ' [=lease Review/ ForYour Information/ Cornment$ Re: Collier county Odor Control Monitor'[rig We hereby propose to furnish "Outec" brand remote data acquisition hardware to receive and communicate plant operation status to [he SCADA system at the second floor operations room A Dutec master and expander [/O unit with I/O modules will be furnished in a 4X enclosure with dear e?r. Surge suppression will be furnished for the supply voltage and the communication lines to the DA. No suppression [or lhe field inputs included. Includes all required hardware, terminals, fuses mount[ng steel and assembly $731200 To clarify what is needed ror a complete workable system. Please examine the following. The remote hardware above & installed. (Best) $731:2.00 W~ring of the instruments and pump status contacts, to ihe remote I/O. Install communicalion cable from the remote I/O unit to the second floor control room SCADA. (Best) $8911.00 Driveway culting, if necessary. (Best) $6282.00 Modifying existing pump controls and instruments for the required signals. (JAWS) SCADA reprogramming, new screens and startup of the new remote IlO unks (county) Note: The above concept of monitoring has been confirmed with the county's SCADA maintenance contractor ,Rich Wilkins, who would do the reprocjramming. HEAVY CONSTRUCTION- MOTOR CONTROL- POWER · J SEPt5 1998 QUOTATION/PROPOSAL AU-FAB Industries Aluminum Fabrication Specialist FROM START TO FINISH DATE Aluminum Fabrication · Electrostatic · Awnings & Canvas Powder Coaling$ · On-site Welding · Inslallation INQUIRY NO. 4420 Mnrcantile Ave,, Suite 103 Naples, Florida 34104 Office: 941-403-0970 ~-o:c,~. c, ," ,0 ~ co ,,~~ c_~. _. ~_... ~' '~"~;"'*',,I o, ;Z,;s ( SALESMAN CONTACT /PHONff NO. ~ ~J o-~1 START DATE ABOVE PRICES GOOD FOR ..... DAYS. Q U OTATI ON/PROPOSAL I -risEP 15 l~sS CARDINAL coNTRACTORS PO BOX 4297 SARASOTA. f:I. 34230-4297 TRANSblITTAL SI4EET BILL MooKE MOI-LKN 'FI IA3,~I, OFHCE OF ~PIT.~ PKO~.~ 08/20/98 1-941.77~9370 p~o~ ~u~rx 941-951'~51 1-941.77~192 BILL MOORE ADOIJtONAL WORK FOR oDO~R CONTROL EQUIPMENT ~'~IN~UDING FRP ENCLOSURES FABRICATE oPEN!NGS FOR DEGASStFIERS ' LS 1 UMiNUM LADDER ASSEMBLY LS 2 M~ 32 INSTALL LADDER ASSEMBLY MODtF~CATtONSIADDtTIONS TO ODOR LS 1 :ONTROL EQUIPMENT pER THE JACOBS OUP QUOTATION OF 618198 FRP CONTAINMENT BOX :~ULSAT1ON DA,MPTER --LECTRICAL NSTALLATION OF ABOVE ACCESSORIES EA 2 EA 2 LS 1 MH 40 SUPERINTENDENT- KEVIN OPPERMAN pER-DiEM EXPENSES FOR suPERINTENDEN] ~J ECT MANAGER WKS 4 DAYS 22 MH 12 MODIFY CAUSTIC LINE LABOR MATERIALS SALES TAX MH L1 LS 24 1 1 1 1 SUB-TOTAL BONDS &iNSURANCE @ 3% OH&P TOTAL LS · LS coST S12,176 00 52,890.00 $,1700 $11,475.00 ;O'I'AL COST 512,176.00 55,780.00 $544 00 511,475.00 $1,150 O0 $1,B04.00 517.223 C0 $17.00 $1,02000 585.00 555 58 S15.64 $1,215 00 53,194 31 $1,955.63 $9,778.14 $2,300 00 $3,608 00 $17,22300 S680.00 54.080.00 $1,870.00 5666 96 5375 36 $1,215.00 $3,19431 $65,187.63 $1,95563 59,778.14 $76,921.40 #o.~ SEP 1 5 From WATTS FIBERGLASS INDUSTRIAL FABRICATION & REPAIR 8331 Purvis Rosd · Lithia, FL 33547 24 HR. SERVICE Bryan C, Wntts Greg (813) 737.1417 rt,' p cas'ecl to quate as fcHl~ws. Your in..g~y Pries queled ate F.O.I Delivery, Price SEP 1 5 1595 the JACOBS C .ROUP, inc. 160 SCARLET BOULEV,\RD OLDSM,\R, FLORIDA 34677 ' (813] 854-5297 FAX {$13] 855.8821 Junc 8, 1998 Cardinal Contractors, Inc. P. O. Box 4297 Sarasota, FL 34236 Ann: Mr. Bill Moore, P.E. ..-.-. rT4~, smit Via Fax: 941 365 92.;.1 ~ ~ChRDiNAL COhlg,'~CiOn$. 1~ 3. GM ~-- PM COLLIER COL~TY SOUTH \VATER TREATMENT PLANT ODOR CONTROL SYSTEM SUBJECT: P,_EQUEST FOR QUOTATION ADDITIONAL MATEPdALS Dear Gentlemen: We are pleased to quote the followina_ equipment and/or services only as detailed in this proposal. We do not include installation of equipment, interconnecting of wiring or piping of any type, or local, State or Federal taxes. ITEM A: Modifications to the odor control system control panels including labor and material, referencing the memorandum from Barry Erickson to Bobb Reeder, dated Ma)' 19, 1998. Modifications to include: · Addition ofterminal strip connections to monitor: 4 Blowers (On/Off) · Chemical Feed Pumps (On/OIT) · 8 Recirculation Pumps (On/Off) · 4-20 mA Output for pH Reading · 4-20 rrna Output for ORP Reading · pH Alarm · ORP Alarm The request for level controls on the chemical tanks needs to be sent back to Technology Integrated Corporation directly. They are the suppliers of these tanks and since they are a special double ,,,,'all containment tank, we feel that it would be best for the Owner to direct all inquiries to Mr. Victor A. Pati at Technology Integrated Corporation (561 863 5795). Cardinal Contractors, Inc. Collier County South WTP-Odor Control System June g, 1995 Page 2 of 3 The H,S High Alarm is not monitored in the panels, but has a dedicated 4-20 rna output that can be connected by field wiring; there is nothing additional for The Jacobs Group, Inc. to supply on this item. ITEM B: 4 Modifications to the odor control vessels for pressure drop reading including labor material. Modifications include adding · 4 - 'A' NPT Connection at top of' vessel. This connection will be fiberglassed in and completed with final touch-up paint by FRP field crew. · Installation of four (4) DvQ'er magnehelic gauges mounted off' fiberglass ear to be added to side of vessel at approximately 4' elevation. · Polyethylene tubing to connect Iow and high pressure points to magnehelic gauges '`vith barbed NPT firtings. ITEM C: 6 Pressure gauges for discharge of chemical f,eed pumps including Ashcroft 3 '/:" diameter, 0-100 psi range, and 316 stainless steel casing ,,,,5th 'A" NPT connection. Each gauge ,,,511 have a liquid isolator; installation of' these gauges ,.,.'ill be by Cardinal Contractor, Inc. ITEM D: Pressure gauges off recirculation pumps; one (!) press,'-_,'~ gauge per tower. Each pressure gauge ,,,,'ill be by Ashcroft 3/12" in diameter, 316 stainless steel with diaphragm isolator. Cardinal Contractors will need to drill and tap the 6" PVC line of, the "T" from the discharge of' the pumps and place pressure gauge and isolator in service. Total Net Price, F.O.B. FactoD', Freight Allowed to Cardinal Contractors' Office ...................................$11,475.00 the JACOBS GROUP, inc. SEP 1998 ,,G. /.S- Cardinal Contractors, Inc. Collier County South WTP-Odor Control Systcrn June 8, 1995 Page 3 of ~ ITEM E: 8 FRP Enclosures to individually cover each recirculafion pump. Total Net Price, F.O.B. Factory, Freight ..$16,000.00 Alloxved to Jobsite ............................................................ If shop drawings are required: 2-3 weeks after receipt of purchase order. Shipment: Completion of work to be done on Items A-D- Four (4) weeks. Completion of work to be done on Item E- Six (6) weeks. Terms: 100% .X:et 30 and The Jacobs Group Standard Terms and C6nditions Apply. We al:predate the opportunity to quote the above items. the JACOBS GROUP, inc. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY AUTHORIZE A BUDGET AMMENDMENT FOR SOUTH REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT FACILITY ODOR CONTROL SYSTEM OPERATING COSTS OBJECTIVE: That the Board of County Commissioners, Ex-Officio, the Governing Board of the Collier County Water/Sewer District, authorize a budget amendment to fund additional chemicals and electrical operating costs associated with the new South Regional Water Treatment Facility (SRWTF) odor control system. CONSIDERATIONS: 1) The Collier County Water Department operates two water treatment plants. 2) The SRWTF has a new odor control system which requires Sodium Hyprochlorite and Sodium Hydroxide for the removal of H2S and CO2 gas. Operating this system also creates additional electrical demand. These additional costs were not included in the FY 98 operating budget. 3) The engineering estimate of annual chemical costs for the new odor control system is $164,000 annually. The chemical cost for the six months the system was operational in FY 98 is $82,000. Based on the analysis of the current budget an additional $48,000 for FY 98 chemical procurement is required. 4) The engineering estimate of annual electrical costs for the new odor control system is $84,000 annually. The electrical cost for the six months the system was operational in FY 98 is $42,000. Additionally, when the FY 98 electrical budget without odor control was prepared it was under budgeted by approximately $50,000. As a consequence the total amount needed for electricity through the end of the fiscal year is $92,000. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None F)SCAL IMPACTr_.' Budgeted funds are not adequate to procure the chemicals and electricity required for operation of the odor control system through the end of FY 98. The additional chemical cost to operate this system through the end of FY 98 is estimated to be $48,000. The additional electrical cost to operate this system plus normal electrical costs through the end of FY 98 are estimated to be $92,000. A budget amendment is required in CCWSD Operating Fund (408), in the amount of $140,000 will be processed that utilizes savings due to position vacancies in the Water Department cost centers 253211 (SCRWTP) for $40,000, 253215 (Water Operation.(, Maintenance) for_S50,000, SEP 1 § 1998 ~ '~ I Page 2 Executive Summo'y 253212 (Water Distribution) for $$0,000 and moves funding in the amount of $140,000 into the South Regional Water Treatment Facility's chemical and electrical operating budgets in Fund 408 cost center 25321 I. RECOMMENDATION; Staff recommends that the Collier County Board of County Commissioners, Ex-Officio, the Governing Board of the Collier County Water/Sewer District authorize a Budget Amendment necessary to fund the operating costs of the new ,~;~blic Works ~tion~ D Paul E. Mattausch, Water Director Consent Agenda SEP I 5 1998 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO APPROVE THE TRANSFER OF PROPERTY FROM COLLIER COUNTY TO THE STATE OF FLORIDA TO SATISFY THE REQUIREMENTS OF PERMIT # l 1-00368-S. OBJECTIVE: Recommendation to approve the transfer of property known as the Meli Property owned by Collier County to the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund of the State of Florida to satisfy the requirements of Permit # 11-000368-S (Naples Sanitary Landfill). CONSIDERATION: On April 1, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners approved a Real Estate Purchase Option Agreement ("Option Agreement") to purchase the Meli Property in order to satisfy South Florida Water Management District's permit requirement for the Naples Landfill. On June 24, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners approved the purchase of the 66.3 acre property known as the Meli Property for $200,000.00. A Warranty Deed was recorded on September 5, 1997 in Official Records Book 2344, Page 542 et seq granting the subject property to Collier County. To fulfill the remaining permit requirements, Collier County is required to transfer the property to the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund of the State of Florida. The State of Florida has approved the transfer of property from Collier County and has provided the necessary documents. A copy of the County Deed and Closing Statement is attached hereto and made apart of this Executive Summary. The County Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the documents for the transfer of the subject property. FISCAL IMPACT: Cost for the transfer of property will include: Recertification of survey map $1,000.00 Title Policy $1,066.50 - mandated by the State Recording fees $ 15.00 - mandated by the State Total Cost $2,081.50 Funds are currently available in budget. Solid Waste Fund (470), Solid Waste Adminisu'ation (173410) GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None. SEP 1 RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners: 1) approve the transfer of property to the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund of the State of Florida; 2) authorize staff to obtain the Chairman's execution on the original County Deed and Closing Statement when presented; 4) authorize the Chairman to execute any document necessary to record and transfer property to the State of Florida; and 5) authorize staff to proceed with proper closing and recording procedures for the subject Property. REVIEWED BY: REVIEWED -) Wilma Iverson, Sen'"~or Property Specialist Real Property Management Department '"' Z, David W. Russell, Director Solid Waste Management Department Ed IIschner, Administrator Public Works Division DATE DATE SEP 1 5 lS98 Please Return ?o: Guardian Titlc$crviccs. Inc, 1802 Broadway Fort Myers. Florida 33901 COUNTY DEED ($ TA TUTORY FORM . SECTION 125.411, F.S.) ATTACHMENT #1 THIS INDENTURE, made this, day of , A.D. 1998, between Collier County, a politlc31 subdivision of the State of Florida, whose address is 3301 Tamlaml Trail East, Naple~, Florida 34112, of the County of Collier in the State of Florida, parry, of the first pan, Md the BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE INTERNAL IMPROYE31EN'T TRUST FUND OF THE STATE OF FLOR]DA, whose post office address is c/o Florida Department of Environmental P:'.t:t~:ion. D~vision of State Lands, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, ~,lail Station 115, Tall~asset, FL 32399-3000, pa,.?' o£ the second pan. (Wherever used herein the terms 'party of the first part" and 'par~, of the second par~" laclude all Ihe parties to this instrument and their heirs, legsl representatives, successors and assigns. 'Party of the First psr~~ and 'part? of the second para" are used for singular and plural, as the eontczt requires and the use of aoy zender shall include all genders.) ' WIT,~ESSETH: That the said parry of thc first par~ for and in consideration of the sum often Doll,_-s. to it in hand paid by thc parry of thc se:ond part, receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has gnmted, bargained and sok~ to '.~.: sa!d party, of:he se:ond pan. its successors and assigns forever, thc following described land situate, lying and being ;..n Collier. Ccunry.. Florida, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" anached hereto and by reference made a pan hereof, together with all r:r.~.,~>-'~ an~ !L-.:ral righu al:pertaining there:o, and aH in:eresu in subsurface oil. gas and minerals pursue, ne to 270.1 I(.%), F.S. Acce;t~nce of Transfer of Tide to Donated Lands a~ched hereto as Exhibit "B" and by re.":.--..':.:: .-..:~: a pan hereof. Property Appraiser's Parcel Identification Number: 007364.40002 WITNESS WHEREOF the said pa~/of the first pan h:.s caused these presents to be ex.--:'.:'::.~ ir. ?:.s name by its Board of Court,.? Commissioners acting by the :hair or Vice Chair of said board, the day and year afcres.,i:. Collier County a political subdivision of:he S":e BY: Barbara B. Berry, Chairman Collier County ~oard of County Commissioners 3.t01 Tamiami Trail East Naples, Florida 34112 Dwight E. Brock, Deputy Clerk CO -:f" 'I-ha,. portion of the North-h~.lf ('N 1/'2), lying North of U.S. 41 ("r~-~i T.?.!:i), Section 11, Town. ship $1 South, P, zngc 26 East, Collier Count'y, Flo~d~. COPY ACCEPTANCE OF TRANSFER OF TITLE TO DONATED LANDS Board or Trustees of the Inlcrnal [mprovemtnl Trust Fund o[ the Slzte of Florida bereb? ac:e;u :,bLs conveyance u a transfer of title orthe real property M described in this Deed. $1GNATURE OF FIRST WITNF-SS) (PRINTED, TYPED OR STAMPED NAS"iE OF FIRST WITNESS) BOAR~ OF TRUSTEES OF TH~.= I'N"i'E~NAL hMPROVEMEN'T TRUST FU~D OF THE STATE OF FLO.:LID^ BY: Senior Mu~ast~cnt A:~J:.T: II. DP~ ISIO, OF STATE LANDS, DEPARTMEN'T O.: _~,. 'VIRON.'MENTAL PROTECTION, ~s ajt.-.t let a.~d cn behalf of the Board of Tr.-'s:et.s :f ~:: Internal Imptovem ¢.":1 of the State of Flor!da CPRINTED. TYPED OR STAMPED NA.ME OF SECOND WITNESS) Date Signed STATE OF//--/,g-~ ) ) COUNTY OFf:If · The foregoing instrument wa~ acknos,tlcdged bcfor~ me this _.~ day of .,~u~ ~' . 19:.._.~,. ':.:- Robe~ J. Lo,,em. Sent. or .M~agement Analys! II. Division of Slate Lands, Department of Environmental Protect:ch. ,_s :i ::.t for ar, d on behalf of the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund of the Sta~e of Florida. He is pc.,-scr, sii.v k.:own to mc. (NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL) f. Kq~i. Ixecp rob Notary Public (.Printed. Typed. or S~mt:'e~' N a..-:.e of Notary Public) DONA TION SETTLEM£/VT $ TA TE,$IE;~'T NAME AND ADDRESS OF DONEE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF T~IE INTER,NAt TRUST FUND OF TI. IE :~rATE OF FLGR/DA ~00 COMMON'WEALT}I BOULEVAR.Z) TALI.AI ba,~SSEF.. FLOR/DA 32399-3000 MANAGING AGENCY: COPY NAME AND ADDR.,ESS OF D,C.~C;R ' COLLJER C OLIN'I'Y HAPI.~,~, ~"I..OR/DA )41 l: SDTTL.~i ~'f DATE: JU~£ ,1991 PROPERTY LOCAT1ON I I-$ |-26 NORTH OF US 4 I FOLIA 007364,10002 I~LE NUMBER: D??)$OR SUMMARY OF DONEE'S COSTS VALUE ATTRJBL,"TED FOR DONATION PARCEL 198,300.00 $~I~NT AGENT: GUARDIAN TITL£ PLACE OF SLrTTL~,I ------------------~T: Il0:2 BROADWAY FIRT MYT.]L~. Ft,.OR/DA SUI.dMARY OF DONOR'S VALUE ATTRIBUTED FOR EC.",L~:CN ?ARC£L ' 198'300.00 GROSS ASSESSED VALUE 198,300.00 GROSS ASSESSED VALL'~ 195'300.00 A.',~OUNTS PAiD DY OR IN BEHALF OF DONEE DONATED I.~N DS 1.40 FL,rND$ E.'KCH~NGED 19L300.00 ILEDUC"nONS DONAT~DL.A.~DS NOFG~DSEXCM. ANGED 19S,~00.00 SETTLE),I'~'NT COSTS FROM A'TT..~.~-.'~D PAGE TOTAL (DO,"tAT[D ASSESSED VALUE) CROSS AMOUHT ASSESSED 195,300.00 19L300.00 TOTAL ('DONATED ASSES, S;.D ','ALL'r PLUS 5 LTTL~r ~,IENT COSTS) GROSS A.",IOUNT ASSE-~SED 198'300,00 195300.00 CASHI ITO [ ]FROMDONEE -0- C~,[ITOIzl SEP 1 5 lYS8 IT~.N4$ TO 13E PAID fN ADVANC[ 1991 PROPI'"P.T'Y TAXF.5 Tm.[ al^Rcr~ Settlement or ClosinJ tee AbsU'act or Tltle search to: Title examination Title insurance binder to: Guudi~ Title $1,066.50 PO(: by Collier County Title Insunnce to: Owner's Covenl~e St98.300.00 I~AID FRO~ DONOR'S IrU11OS AT S ET'T1.E.~ Lr'N'T COV£RNMtrN'T RECORDING AND T~',N$1"~R CItARG£S Recording fees: Deed S 15.00 to Clerk of Circuit Court ?OC by Collier County ADDITIONAL S L'TTL~.~I £h'T C]IARGF..S Survey to: SOLFTHEL'¢ MAPPING T£CI-DCOLOG¥. r~c. $4,$~o.oo Poc BY COLLIER COL,',',',',',',',','~F~' Environmcn~l sile uscssmcn~ lo ER.%t-SOL'T"rt, ~C, $3.93S.00 POC BY COLLIER COL.~-~' TOTAL ACQL'ISYi'lO.~ CIIARC£.S CER TIFI~ 710N OF DONEE AND DONOR I have ~ full)' rc~icwcd ~c ~n~ion Sc~lemc~l S~lcmcn~ ~d tO ~ ~Sl Of m~ k~wiedjc ~d ~licf, d~s~.ncmcnU made on my iccogflt b~ mc ~ ~is ~ac~ia~ I ~ct cc~i~ ~at l have KcdYcd I copy DOARD OF TRL'SI'££S OF TII£ IN'I'£R.NAL I~IpROV£,'q[."~'T TRL;S'T FUND OF Tllr STAT£ OF FLORIDA ny COLLI£~, COL'N'TY. X POLF~,,C.~L SL'9DIVlSIO~ OF Tile S'i'ATE OF FLORID '. BY B~b--~ B. Berry, ChaL .'.--...'--'~ Collier County Board of Ccu.'.r/Commissioners BY SEP 1 5 P~. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE BID #98-2840, "MOWING OF GRASSED OR VEGETATED AREAS," AND DIRECT STAFF TO AWARD CONTRACT TO LOW BIDDER. OBJECTIVE: To obtain Board approval of Bid #98-2840 for the mowing of grassed or vegetated .areas and direct staff to award thc contract to the low bidder, Southern Services of LaBelle, Inc. CONSIDERATIONS: On August 26, 1998, the Purchasing Department opened bids for the mowing of grassed and vegetated areas in Collier County. A total of five (5) bids were received and opened. The area to be mowed is 693 acres for one cycle of mowing. There are an estimated eight (8) mowing cycles per year, and the total acreage to be mowed per year is 5,554 acres. The follo~ving is a summary of unit prices submitted by the bidders: BIDDER Southern Services of LaBelle, Inc. C & M Property Management Horticultural Industries A Personal Touch JP's Yardworks COST PER ACRE $14.50 $25.00 $30.0O $75.00 $80.00 Staff has reviewed the bids and recommends acceptance of the bid submitted by Southern Services of LaBelle, Inc. as the lowest responsible bid. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $95,000 are budgeted and available in the following accounts: MSTD Road District 2 Fund 103-163642-634999 MSTD Road District 3 Fund 104-163643-634999 MSTD Road District 5 Fund 106-163645-634999 $ 7,000 $28,000 $60,000 GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None RECOM31ENDATION: That the Board award Bid t/98-2840 to the low bidder, Southern Services of LaBelle, Inc. for the mowing of grassed and vegetated areas in Collier County. PREPARED BY: -~~~C~as_'mg Director REVIEWED BY.'_.-~-~~-~~~ . Ed Ilschner, Public Works Administrator Larry Hem'y, Road & Bridge Supzrintendent fi' t/,/,~'-'~ATE: DATE: 9/2/98 DATE: q_q_q_q_q_q_q_q_q_~~ f' SEP 1 5 1998 ~;. SEP 1 5 1998 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RECOMMENDATION THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AUTHORIZE THE PROCUREMENT OF ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION PHASE OF THE CLAM BAY RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners authorize the procurement of engineering services for the implementation phase of the Clam Bay Restoration and Management Plan. .CONSIDERATION: On August 13, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners approved the procurement of services to direct in the development of the Clam Bay Restoration and Management Plan. In the development .of this Plan, the participation of consultants with expertise in specific areas and historic knowledge of the system were approved on September 17, 1996 for assistance in this Plan. In this original authorization, the Board waived the provisions of the Consultant's Competitive Negotiations Act (CCNA) and declared this project a valid emergency such that staff could expeditiously proceed in the permitting of this Plan. Subsequently, on September 1, 1998 the Board confirmed the necessity to immediately and timely proceed towards the implementation phase of this project given the fact that a significant portion of the work contemplated under the Permits is required to be completed in advance of the upcoming turtle season. On October 23, 1997 the Board of County Commissioners authorized the procurement of engineering services which original authorization was given in anticipation of receipt of the Permits which at that time was expected by November of 1997. Since the Permits were never received, staff,, did not authorize commencement of any work under that authorization. The following is an outline of the consultants recommended and which proposals have been revised in conformity with the Permits for this project. Next, on August 4, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners approved and accepted the terms and conditions of the US Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 Permit and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection's Consolidated Joint Coastal Permit, which Permits are intended to allow for the implementation of a comprehensive management plan for the restoration and ongoing management of the Clam Bay system. With the issuance of these Permits, staff is recommending the procurement of engineering services for the preparation of the engineering plans and specifications such that the Department can be in. a position to beg!n construction activities in the Fall of this year. Executive Summary September 15, 1998 At this time there are currently four construction projects in Restoration and Management Plan. the Clam Bay Project #1 Project #2 Project #3 Project ti4 Clam Pass Tidal Creeks (Cuts number 1, 2 and 3) Clam Pass Main Channel (Cut number 4) Interior Tidal Creeks Seagate Culverts Projects #1, #2 and #3 are required to be completed outside of turtle nesting season and Project #2 is a ninety (90) to one hundred and twenty (120) day construction project. Therefore, it is important that the design and construction activities start as early as possible such that Projects #1, #2 & #3 are completed before turtle nesting season which starts May 1. TURRELL & ASSOCIATES (sub-consultant l:Iumiston & Moore) A notable condition of' the Permit is an affirmative requirement to retain a Wetland Biologist .which firm and/or individual must be reviewed and approved by the regulatory agencies and who must be familiar with ecosystems of Florida to submit their qualifications to the regulatory agencies for approval. In accordance with the terms and conditions of the Permit, this firm and/or individual will serve as the supervising scientist that oversees the biological, components of this restoration project and will halt construction if he/she suspects violations of the Permit have occurred. With this requirement, Mr. Todd Turrell of Turrell & Associates is being recommended as the Project Manager which staff will submit to the regulatory agencies for approval and Humiston & Moore will act in a sub- consultant capacity to Turreli & Associates for the design and construction activities related to Projects #I, #2 and//3. Staff' believes that Turrell & Associates and Humiston & Moore have the personnel to meet the requirements of the agencies for the Wetlands Scientist and which we believe will be a valuable asset in providing the necessary expertise with ecosystems of Florida for these activities. AGNOLI, BARBER & BRUNDAGE Their services would be used on Projects #I and #2 and primarily deal with the surveying services that are required for these projects. WILSON, MILLER, BARTON & PEEK Their services would be used on Project #3 and #4 and primarily deal with survey and miscellaneous design work for Projects #3 and be the primary consultant for the preparation of the design specifications, bidding and construction services for Project #4. Executive Summary September 15, 1998 LEWIS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES This firm has both past and present knowledge of this system. Mr. Lewis has been involved in the short term solutions implemented approximately two years ago, which were the flushing cuts and including responsibility for the additional flushing cuts outlined in the current Permit for the long term restoration of Clam Bay. Mr. Lewis would assist in the preparation of the bid documents, construction activities and final reporting and record drawings for Project #3. TACKNEY & ASSOCIATES Mr. Tackney's involvement in the project has been to perform the hydrographic evaluation of the Clam Bay ecosystem. During this phase of the project, Mr. Tackney will be responsible for design review of the plans and specifications relating to Projects #1 and #2. DR. SAMUEL SNEDEKER, UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI Dr. Snedeker is a Professor of the Division of' Marine Biological Fisheries at the University of Miami and had national expertise in mangrove systems and during this phase of the project may be called upon as needed to assist in environmental impacts to vegetation and spoil discharge for the dredging activities. Dr. Snedeker has a high level of' credibility in this field and would be only used on an as needed basis and only to the extent that Turreli & Associates would require these additional services. FISCAL IMPACT: The Fiscal Impact for the above services is $362,420.00 as outlined in the attached proposals. Pelican Bay Services would fund 50% with Funds available in Fund 320 Cost Centers 183800-183804. The remaining 50% would be funded by WCI Communities per the Agreement approved by the Board of County Commissioners. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of County Commissioners authorize the procurement of services from Tun'ell & Associates; Humiston & Moore; Agnoli, Barber & Brundage; Wilson, Miller Barton & Peek; Tackney & Associates; Lewis Environmental; Dr. Samuel Snedeker, and that the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached Proposals with the various consultants as outlined above and authorize the Chairman to sign all necessary PREPARED DATE: /?] lames P. Ward ~ / Department Director Executive Summary September 15. 1998 . (.,.~., '..3'/ DATE: Ste'~ Carne~l - Puc, ba~3~ Director APPROVED B'~ DATE: ~/,~/~'~'" Division Administrator SEP 1 5 f998 TURRELL & ASSOCIATES, INC. j84 Marine & Environmenlal Consulting Exchange Avenue, Suite B · Naples, J:lorida 33942 · (941) 643-0166 · Fax: (941) 643-6632 September 3, 1998 Mr. Jim Ward Collier Countyy, Pelican Bay Services Division 601 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 605 Naples, Florida .34108 RE: PROPOSAL FOR PROFESSIONAL ENVIJRO~NTAL SERVICES CLAM BAY RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT PLAN (CBRMP) Sections 4,5,8,9,32,33, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida Turrell & Associates, Inc. (TAI) is pleased to provide this proposal for professional environmental services for the above referenced project. We understand that TAI will serve as the overall project manager for the Clam Bay restoration project, and associated activities included in this proposal. We have also included proposals from Humiston & Moore Engineers (HME) and Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc. (ABB) which shall cover the dredging activities and surveying respectively. All of these firms have previous experience in Clam Bay and the surrounding area. Please find our scope of services below: CONSTRUCTION SERVICES: I. P~ROJECT #I {CUTS #1, #2 & #3}L 2). 3). 4). Attend pre-construction conference with all contractors, permitteeYagent and agency staff to establi~;h an understanding of specific items in the General and Specific conditions of the permit. To be done in association with dredging/hydrographic engineer. (DEP Permit #0 i 28463-001 -JC, Special Condition # 1 (c). Attend pre-construct/on conference prior to commencement of each dredging event to address environmental issues only. To be done in association with dredging/hydrographic engineer. (DEP Permit #0128463-001-JC, Special Condition #1(d). Accurately identify and map any submerged natural resources (i.e. seagrasses, oyster beds, etc.) adjacent to the areas to be dredged. (DEP Permit #0128463-001-JC, Special Condition #6). TAI will assist the dredging engineer with any environmental aspects of the hydrographic monitoring w~'thin Clam Pass, or the main channel, as often as maintenance excavation is necessary, specifically to Special Condition 2(c), Monitoring Requiri~d, under the DEP permit. SUB-TOTAL ............................................... $10,000 O0 I1. PROJECT #2 (CUT #4, MAIN CHANNEL) Attend pre-construction conference with all contractors, permittee/agent and agency staff to establish an understanding of specific items in the General and Specifi~ conditions of the permit. To be done in association with dredging/hydrographic engineer. (DEP Permit #0128463-001 -JC, Special Condition # 1 (c). 2) 3). Attend pre-construction conference prior to commencement of each dredging event. To be done in association with dredging/hydrographic engineer. (DEP Permit #0128463-001 -JC, Special Condition # I (d). Perform visual surveys for escarpments or barriers along the project area immediately after completion of the project and prior to May !" any year that disposal of beach quality material is placed on the beaches adjacent to Clam Pass, as it relates to sea turtles. The results of these surveys shall be submitted to the DEP prior to any corrective action. A summary ofthe survey and actions taken shall be submitted t~) the DEE To be done in association with dredgin~hydrographic engineer. (DEP Permit #0128463-001-JC, Special Condition #2(f). 4) 5). Coordinate the design and purchase of the required signage within and around the project area (i.e. manatee awareness siizns, idle speed/no wake, etc.) (DEP Permit #0128463-001-JC, Special Condition #3 (g-h), 4 (I-5). Accurately identify and map any submerged natural resources (i.e. seagrasses, oyster beds. etc.) adjacent to the areas to be dredged. ' (DEP Permit #0128463-001-JC, Special Condition #6). SUB-TOTAL ............................................................................................................ $9,500 00 III. PROJECT #3 (INTERIOR CHANNEL._~ Attend pre-construction conference with all contractors, permittee/agent and agency staff to establish an understanding of specific items in the General and SpecifiC: conditions of the permit. To be done in association with dredging/hydrographic engineer. (DEP Permit #0128463-001 -:lC, Special Condition # 1 (c). SEP 15 2). Attend pre-constru~:tion conference prior to commencement of each dredging event To be done in association with dredging/hydrographic engineer. (DEP Permit #0128463-001-JC, Special Condition #l(d). 3). Prior to the initial dredging event, the biologist/wetland scientist(s) shall assist in clearly marking, in the field, the authorized excavation area to allow for the DEP approval. (DEP Permit #0128463-001-JC, Special Condition #1(g). 4). The approved biologist/wetland scientist(s) shall supervise a minimal amount of trimming and removal of mangroves where necessary. Prior to mangrove trimming activities, the species of tree shall be identified and tagged by the biologist/wetland scientist(s). Prior to the removal of any dead mangroves, the trees shall be inspected and tagged for removal by the biologist/wetland scientist(s), then be approved by DEP for removal. (DEP Permit #0128463-001-JC, Special Condition #7). 6). The biologist/wetland scientist(s) shall coordinate the areas designated for the use of explosives to be approved by DEP prior to the use of the explosives. (D£P Permit #0128463-001 -JC, Special Condition # 10). SUB-TOTAL ............................................................................................................... $3,000.00 IV. GENERAL SERVICES: TAI will conduct water quality testing throughout Upper, Inner and Outer Clam Bay according to the parameters indicated in condition 2(d), Monitoring Required of the DEP permit. Thrse analysis' shall be performed immediately prior to and following construction, and monthly thereafter, with the exception ofthe water quality analysis. (#6 of 2(d), Monitoring Required condition of DEP permit). 2). Prior to the initial dredging event, the biologist/wetland scientiest(s) shall assist in clearly marking, in the field, the authorized excavation area to allow for the DEP approval. To be done in association with dredging/hydrographic engineer. (DEP Permit #0128463-00 I-JC, Special Condition # 1 (g). 3). The approved biologist/wetland scientist(s) shall supervise a minimal amount of trimming and removal of mangroves where necessary. Prior to mangrove trimming activities, the species of tree shall be identified and tagged by the biologist/wetland scientist(s). S EP 1 5 (DEP Permit #012i3463-001 -JC, Special Condition #7). 4). TAi shall perform the required turbidity monitoring at least twice dai]y, at least four (4) hours apart, at the identified dredge site, and at the identified disposal sites. Coordinate project specifications related to potential impacts on marine turtles to BPSM for review and approval. To be done in association with dredging- hydrographic engineer. (DEP Permit #0128463-001-JC, Special Condition # 1 (e). 6). TAI shall coordinate marine turtle monitoring reports with the Collier County Department of Natural Resources Protection in order to include data coliection specific to the project area. (DEP Permit #0128463-001-JC, Special Condition #2(d). 7). Prior to the initial dredging event, the biologist/wetland scientist(s) shall assist in clearly marking, in the field, the authorized excavation area to allow for the DEP approval. To be done in association with dredging/hydrographic engineer. (DEP Permit #0128463-001 -JC, Special Condition # 1 (g). 8). TAI shall perform the required turbidity monitoring at least twice daily, at least four (4) hours apart, at the identified dredge site, and at the identified disposal sites. SUB-TOTAL .............................................................................................................. $25,500.00 BIOLOGICAL MONITORING. TAI shall prepare and submit the "Proposed Scope of Work", as described in the Biological Monitbring section of the DEP permit, to the Department for approval. (Special Condition #l(b). (Negotiate acceptance with DEP prior to proceeding). Weekly monitoring data reports shall be submitted to the DEP (Ft. Myers and Tallahassee) office according to the specifications in the DEP permit. 3). TAI will coordinate installation/location of the required staff`gauges and tide gauges with contractor. 4). TAI will assist in the preparation/submittal annual Hydrographic Monitoring Reports to the DEP office in association with appropriate hydrological engineers. TAg will facilitate flight-dated aerial photography of the Clam Bay ecosystem before and after the authorized activity. The aerials will be taken during July of each year 4 SEP 1 and submitted to th'e DEP annually for the duration ofthe permit. This service shall be billed under a seperate, professional aerial photography element and the use of oblique/data aerials. 6). TAd will groundtruth the areas of special concern within the Clam Bay ecosystem, including the areas containing dead/dying mangroves, Inner, Upper and Outer Clam Bays, the areas receiving water discharges fi.om the uplands, and areas contiguous with the main pass. These surveys, along with associated drawings/mapping shall be conducted prior to dredging activities, and annually thereafter, for the life of the permit. 7). 8), TAd will prepare and submit annual biological monitoring reports to the DEP. beginning one year following permit issuance. The first report will contain time zero conditions of the study area prior to the commencement of the authorized activities, and a progress report of the acitivitJes conducted since permit issuance. Thereafter, each report shall contain a progress report of the activities completed since the previous report, and all the data collected since the previous report. TAd will provide ground-level, color panoramic photos of each study area, at fixed locations, conclusions and recommendations concerning potential impacts the authorized activity may have had, in the above referenced biological monitorinu repons. ~ S rrB-TOTAL .............................................................................................................. $28.500.00 Please note that the fee is subject to the assumption that the Department of Environmental Protection will sign offon our proposed scope of work. We are optimistic about this and will try to minimize an), Future agency requirements. The Pelican Bay Sen'ices Division will be notified immediately if the proposed scope is rejected. ' A~£NOA IT~_ SEP 1 § 199B PROPOSAL SUMMARY PROJECT#1 ............................................................................................................... $I 0,000.00 PROJECT#2 ................................................................................................................. $9,500.00 PROJECT#3 ................................................................................................................. $3,000.00 GENERAL SERVICES .............................................................................................. $25,500,00 BIOLOGICALMONITORING ................................................................................. $28,500.00 PROJECT MANAGEMENT SERVICES .................................................................. $12,500.00 TOTAL ........................................................................................................................ S89,000.00 It is understood that TAI will act as the project manager for the above referenced project in association with the dredging engineers. TAI shall be present at all pre-construction and pre-bid conferences, coordinate field data/information exchange with contractor/surveyor/engineer, and be present during the time ofconstruction in order to comply with the DEP permit. Project management services will be billed under the following titles. Principal/Professional Engineer ($125 per hr.). Marine Consultant ($95 per hour)and Biologist/Project Manager ($95 per hr.). The persons associated with the above titles will be Mr. Todd T. Turrell, P.E. as Principal/Professional Engineer ($125 per hr.), Dr. Marty Roessler, Pr. D. as Senior Biologist ($125 per hr.). Miles Scofield as Marine Consultant ($95 per hour) and lan Butler as Biologist/project Manager ($95 per hr.) This proposal does not include lab fees for conducting water quality testing, soil testing, etc. We will provide bids from local labs and choose the most cost effective outfit. Any additional services, which are not specifically listed under this proposal, shall be billed on a time and materi~s basis, according to the attached fee schedule, upon authorization from the client This includes additional services requested by agency/agencies as a result of the surveys performed, data collected or field adjusted methodologies. If you wish for us to proceed please sign and return the last page of this proposal. Thank you Sincerely, TURRELL & ASSOCIATES. INC. Tod&T. '~rr ell~' P.E. 6 c:'~1ocs,9845 9845-pr02 NO. SEP 1 5 Po _~'~ . 106~ I ,M~oORT I~::)~O N. ~dTE 14 N,N~[S. FLOI:~O~ 34109 FAX 941 59~ PHO'~ ~L4~ August 24, 1998 Memo to: Mr. Kyle Lucasz Fax: 597-5400 Mr. Todd Turrell, P.E. Fax: 643-6632 From: Ken Humiston Re: Response to RFP for engineering services related to dredging for the Clam Bay Restoration & Management Project, H&M File No. 8042 Humiston & Moore Engineers (H&M)is pleased to provide this response to your Request for Proposal on the referenced project. This proposal is for providing engineering services for the dredging of Clam Pass and sections of the tidal creeks from Upper Clam Bay to Outer Clam Bay, as described in the Clam Bay Restoration and Management Plan. This proposal is to provide engineering services related to dredging activities as a subconsultant to Turrell & Associates, Inc. as the project manager. Additionally, the scope of work listed below is a part of an effort by a project team which includes Wilson, Miller, Barton, and Peek, Inc., who will be responsible for design and post construction surveying services, and Tackney & Associates who will be the consultant with regard to project consistency with technical studies completed as part of the regulatory approval process. The scope of work is described below in greater detail, with estimated amounts to be budgeted for each project. Scope of Work I. Project #1 (Cuts #1, #2, & #3) Basic Services 1) Coordinate with Wilson, Miller, Barton, & Peek Surveying Department regarding collection of hydrographic and topographic data. It is anticipated that data collection will include hydrographic cross sections of the channels to be dredged and topographic data on the designated upland disposal sites. Due to the irregular geometry of the channel, we will work with the surveyor to designate locations where cross section data will be collected for the purpose of designing the dredge cut and computing quantities to be AGE A dredged. Similarly, data must be collected in the vicinity of the proposed upland disposal areas so that the containment dikes may be configured to insure that the disposal area will have sufficient capacity to hold the estimated dredge quantities. Project #1 Task 1 Subtotal ................................................ $ 1,490.00 2) Design the channel dredging template and compute the quantities to be dredged. Prepare construction drawings consisting of channel cross sections at a minimum spacing of 100 feet, and closer where channel geometry dictates the need for tighter control. Project #1 Task 2 Subtotal ................................................ $ 6,290.00 3) Design three upland disposal areas for the disposal of non-beach compatible material and prepare construction plans for the disposal areas. Project #1 Task 3 Subtotal ................................................ $ 3,890.00 4) Design a restoration plan for the disposal areas to restore natural dune topography and prepare construction plans for the restoration. Project #1 Task 4 Subtotal ................................................ $ 2,990.00 5) Prepare an opinion of probable cost. Project #1 Task 5 Subtotal ................................................ $ 2,790.00 Project #1 Basic Services Subtotal ................................... $17,450.00 Project #1 Bid Services Prepare. bid documents to consist of 1) Information for Bidders, 2) Bid Forms, 3) Form of Contract 5) Supplementary Conditions 6) and Technical Specifications; and coordinate inclusion with client's Standard General Conditions of the construction contract Project #1 Task 6 Subtotal ................................................ $ 4,850.00 7) Assist the Pelican Bay Services District through the Bid process by preparing a list of qualified bidders and advertising the work, attending a pre-bid meeting, conducting a site visit for prospective bidders, preparing any necessary bid addenda, evaluating bids and making a recommendation of award to the lowest responsive bidder. Project #1 Task 7 Subtotal ................................................ $ 4,490.00 Project #1 Bid Services Subtotal ....................................... $ 9,340.00 Page 2 of 5 SEP 1 5 t99 ,o . Project #1 Additional Services 8) Coordination with other project team members regarding regulatory issues and continuity among all project elements, meetings, or other services requested by the Client. Project #1 Task 8 Subtotal ................................................ $ 3,100.00 9) Provide construction phase services to include: daily construction observations of the work and advise the Owner and Contractor regarding progress and conformance of the work to the contract documents; provide interpretations to the contract documents and plans as needed; review Contractor requests for payment and make recommendations to the Owner regarding progress payments; and conduct such tests and inspections in conjunction with the Surveyor to determine substantial completion, make a recommendation on final acceptance, and certification of completion of the project as required by the regulatory permits. For the purposes of this proposal, it is assumed that these services will be provided for a two month construction period. Project #1 Task 9 Subtotal ................................................ ~ 25,800.00 Project #1 Additional Services Subtotal ........................... _$ 28,900.00 Project #1 Subtotal ......................................................... $ 55,690.00 · I. Project #2 (Cut #4, Main Channel) Basic Services 1) Coordinate with Wilson, Miller, Barton, & Peek Surveying Department regarding collection of hydrographic and topographic data. It is anticipated that data collection will include hydrographic cross sections of the channels to be dredged, topographic data on the designated upland disposal sites, and beach profiles in the designated beach disposal areas. Due to the irregular geometry of the channel, we will work with the surveyor to designate' locations where cross section data should be collected for the purpose of designing the dredge cut and computing quantities to be dredged. Similarly data must be collected in the vicinity of the proposed upland disposal area so that the containment dike may be configured to insure that the disposal area will have sufficient capacity to hold the estimated quantity of non-beach compatible material. Project #2 Task 1 Subtotal ................................................ $ 1,490.00 Page 3 of 5 AGENOA SEP 1 5 1998 2) Design the channel dredging template and compute the quantities to be dredged. Prepare construction drawings consisting of channel cross sections at a minimum spacing of 100 feet, and closer where channel geometry dictates the need for tighter control. Project #2 Task 2 Subtotal ................................................ $ 6,290.00 3) Design an upland disposal area for the disposal of non-beach compatible material and prepare construction plans. Project #2 Task 3 Subtotal ................................................ $ 1,990.00 4) Design a beach fill template for beach fill limits with a 1'10 slope to accommodate the estimated beach fill quantity. Prepare construction plans for the beach fill. Project #2 Task 4 Subtotal ......................................... $ 1,790.00 5) Design a restoration plan for the disposal area and prepare construction plans for the restoration. Project #2 Task 5 Subtotal .......... 6) Prepare an opinion of probable cost. Project #2 Task 6 Subtotal ........................ $ Project #2 Basic Services Subtotal Project #2 Bid Services 1,290.00 2,790.00 ................................... $15,640.00 7) Prepare bid documents to consist of 1) Information for Bidders, 2) Bid Forms, 3) Form of Contract 5) Supplementary Conditions 6) and Technical Specifications; and coordinate inclusion with client's Standard General Conditions of the construction contract Project #2 Task 7 Subtotal ................................................ $ 4,850.00 8) Assist the Pelican Bay Services District through the Bid process by preparing a list of qualified bidders and advertising the work, attending a pre-bid meeting, conducting a site visit for prospective bidders, preparing any necessary bid addenda, evaluating bids and making a recommendation of award to the lowest responsive bidder. Project #2 Task 8 Subtotal. ............................................... $ 4,490.00 Project #2 Bid Services Subtotal ....................................... $ 9,340.00 Page 4 of 5 NO.~ SEP 1 5 t998 / Project #2 Additional Services 9) Coordination with other project team members regarding regulatory issues and continuity among all project elements, meetings, or other services requested by the Client. Project #2 Task 9 Subtotal ................................................ $ 3,100.00 10)Provide construction phase services to include: daily construction observations and advise the Owner and Contractor regarding progress and conformance of the work to the contract documents; provide interpretations to the contract documents and plans as needed; review Contractor requests for payment and make recommendations to the Owner regarding progress payments; conduct such tests and inspections in conjunction with the Surveyor to determine substantial completion, make a recommendation on final acceptance, and certification of completion of the project as required by the permits. For this proposal, it is assumed that these services will be provided for a two month construction period. Project #2 Task 10 Subtotal .............................................. $ 25,800.00 Il)Collect additional borings to refine the analysis of the material to be placed on the beach and to provide additional detailed subsurface information for preparation of Plans and Specifications. Project #2 Task 11 Subtotal. Project #2 Additional Services Subtotal ........................... ~ Project #2 Subtotal ......................................................... $ 74,380.00 Summary of project budget Project #1 ...................... ' Project #2 ................................... $ 55,690.00 ..................................... ~ 74,380;0_0 Total for Projects 1 and 2 .............................................. $130,070.00 Additional Services, to include those additional services listed above plus any services not specifically listed in this scope of work but required by the client, will be billed on a time and materials basis, upon authorization of the Pelican Bay Services District, in accordance with the attached fee schedule dated January 1, 1998 and Standard General Conditions dated August 22, 1996. Additional Services may include sampling, testing, laboratory fees, or other data collection as needed to supplement existing information for the purpose of design and preparation of construction specifications. Please call me if you have any questions regarding this proposal. Page 5 of 5 annnnrA nnmn' illl . GNOLI BmlIIIIIBbT~ lUlIIInh'IN IIIIIBIB I I i I-~ ~r .~ -~,.~..-,.,-, Pmf'cs$ion~ cn~ncc~s, planners &l:nd surv~ors August 31, 1998 Mr. Kyle Lucas Pelican Bay Services Division gO1 Lam'el Oak Drive Naples, Florida 3410S RE: Clam Pass and Clam Bay Waterways, ABB PN 7740/X001 Dear Kyle: We are pleased to submit the following proposal for Professional Surveying and Mapping Services on the above referenced project. Project # l Dred£in~ Cuts # I, #2 and #3 Cut # l: 730 feet long, 15 feet wide 14 cross sections Cut #2: 550 feet long, 20 feet wide 10 cross sections Cut #3: 630 feet long, 20 feet wide 12 cross sections The cross sections will extend beyond the cut limit to the mangrove fringe, a distance of 10 to 15 feet. On the initial survey, two PVC pipe markers will be driven along each section alignment for construction consol and as reference for conducting the post dredging survey. A post construction survey certified by a registered land surveyor will be provided to DEP. Three Upland Disposal Areas The topographic survey for each area should encompass approx a'nately two acres. Project #2 Dredffin~ Cut #4 Cut tt4A 2330 feet long, 30 feet wide 24 cross sections Cut #4B 100 feet long, 20 feet wide 2 cross sections Cut t/-4C 1270 feet long, 40 feet wide 13 cross sections Cut t14D 200 feet long, 40 feet wide 3 cross sections The cross sections will extend beyond the cut lin,~t to the mangrove fringe, a distance of 15 to 20 feet. On the i~itial survey, two PVC pipe markers will be driven along each section alignment for construction control and as reference for conducting the post dredging survey. ~GI:~O~ A post construction survey certified by a r~gistered la.nd surveyor will be provided to DEP. SEP 1 5 1 98 Main Office: 7400 Tamian~i Trail N.. Suite 200. Narlcs. Fh~n,ta 341 OS · t.~41 30-.3111 · F.~Y: t)41 l.c-e .r:.:)unt~':.'¢)='3 Hcz:,!r' ". <:t;:e 101. F~,r: .Xl:'crs. Fl,)r!.!.: .:.:':'); . '" -. .... - '-: 7~." "-' dugnm $1. 1998 Page 2 U~land Disposal Area The topographic survey for this area should encompass approximately two acres. .Beach Disposal Area It is assumed that 5,000 feet of beach will need to be surveyed on 6 DNR monuments, out to wading depth. Additionally, during construction we will place stakes along the MHW line in the same manner as was done for the previous dredging of Clam Pass. Clam Pass Surveys The permit also requires a pre- and post-construction survey within a 500-foot zone surrounding Clam Pass. We propose to survey R-41 and three profiles to the south on 250-foot offsets. The estimated cost for the above referenced project is as follows: Estimated Cost Project # I (Design) Pre-construction Cross Sections Upland Disposal Areas Topo $8,100.00 $4,200.00 Project ~t I (Construction) Post-construction Cross Sections ~,800.00 Total: $17,100.00 Project #2 (Design) Pre-cons~'uction Cross Sections Upland Disposal Area Topo Beach Disposal Area Pre-Construction Survey @ Pass $5,300.00 $1,700.00 $2,000.00 $1,000.00 Projec~ #2 (Consu'uction) Post-construction Cross Sections Post-construction Survey @ Pass $4,900.00 $!,0oo.00 Total: $15,900.00 For items I and 2 above our fees are estimated to be Thirty-three Thousand ($33,000) Dollar~, plus out of pocket expenses. Oor actual fees shall be based on the time .a.nd materials expended in accordance with our rate schedule in contzac~ #96-2550, dazed November 5, 1996. A minimum of two (2) working days notice shall be provided before field services are required. These fees are for providing one (I) time staking only. Any re-staking or additional work shall be based on and materials expended in accordance with our rate. S EP Mr. Kytt Aug~zt $1. 1998 Page 3 All services will be performed under the terms and conditions specified in the "Fixed Term Land Surveying and Photogramme~c Services" Agreement between the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County, Florida and Agnoli, Barber & Brundage, Inc., Conlxact #96-2550, dated November 5, 1996. We would expect to start our services promptly after receipt of your acceptance of this proposal and to comp. lete our services within a reasonable time period. You would be expected to provide two (2) full sets of construction plans for the project including all criteria and full information including but not limited to, special or extraordinary considerations for the project or special services needed. Guy P. Afams,[P.SM. GPA~Ia encl. ACCEPTED THIS BY __ DAY OF ,1998. Propert7 Owner(s) or Authorized Agent(s) 0L939KS.PRO WORK AUTHORJZAT~ON This Work Authorization made and entered into this day of 1998, by and between the Board of County Commissioners of Collier' County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY" and Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peek, Inc., a Florida corporation, hereinafter referred to as "ENGINEER". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, ENGINEER entered into an engineering agreement dated January 21, 1987, with the Pelican Bay Improvement District to perform general consulting services invoMng engineering, surveying, planning, environmental management, or permitting, financial or econo~c feasibility studies, water and sewer utilities, water management facilities, street l/ghting facilities and other infrastructure and civil-type Projects for the Pelican Bay Improvement District, as defined by supplemental agreements; and WHEREAS, the Pelican Bay Improvement District was dissolved and under the Plan of dissolution, COUNTY assumed the fights and obligations of ali contracts for services and materials to which the Pelican Bay Improvements District was a party; and WIqEREAS, pursuant to the agreement between ENGINEER and the Pelican Bay Improvement District, COUNTY wishes to contract with ENGINEER to provide engineering services for Projects serving the Pelican Bay area. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the prem/ses and the mutual benefits which will accrue to the parties hereto in carrying out the terms of this Work Authorization, it is mutually understood and agreed as follows: 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project consists of the design, bidding, and construction phase services associated with a portion of the "Clam Bay Restoration and Management Plan". The purpose of the plan is to set forth a coherent and task oriented package of practical solutions for the restoration of the Clam Bay ecosystem and the regeneration of the dying mangroves. The following scope of services outlines the work necessary to accomplish the construction portion of the plan. Y~O 103'.0 ,'"a-/JO~ t P S^ .20520 SEP { 5 1998 For bidding and contracting purposes, the Project is separated into smaller Projects as follows: Project Project description Manage~e__~nt_ Plan Section Number 1 Clam Pass Tidal Creeks 4.5.2 Cuts 1, 2, and 3 2 Clam Pass Main Channel 4.5.2 Cut 4 3 Interior Tidal Creeks 4.5.3 ..... 4 Sea,,ate Culverts 4.5.1 The separation into smaller Projects will provide flexibility in awarding the construction contracts allowing the County to select up to four contractors to complete the entire Project. Initial conversations with marine and dredging contractors indicate that because the work encompasses various contacting specialties, most contractors will not want to bid the entire Project without large mark-ups on the mb-contracted portions. In addition, and because time is a factor in the completion of the Project, multiple contractors can finish the Project in less time than one contractor can. Project$1 and 2 - Clam Pass Tidal Creeks and Main Channel Field studies revealed two different conditions that contribute to the observed mangrove mortality. The tidal creeks leading north from Clam Pass and the two upper bays are surrounded by a berm with a crest elevation ofbetween approximately 1.4 and i.8 fl. NGVD. Landward of this berm the ground elevations generally decrease and then rise again. As a result, the berm functions as a dike which separates the tidal creeks and upper bays from smaller emba~,ments within the mangrove forest. NOI03-O~£PSA-20320 The second condition which contributes to prolonged periods of flooding results from the existing geometry and bathymetry of the bays and connecting tidal creeks and flow channels. The tidal creek leading narth from Clam Pass is narrow and extremely sinuous. Although the average creek depth is approximately 2.5 ft. NGVD, two areas of localized constriction were noted and in one of these areas, the maximum creek depth was less than -! ft. NGVD In addition, the northern end of the creek connecting Inner Clam Bay and Upper Clam Bay is extremely constricted. The reduced tides in the upper bays are due to the Ngh resistance to flow offered by the tidal creek and the reduced tidal range at the .southern entrance to the creek.. The restricted condition of the tidal creeks also dramatically reduces the tidal range in the upper bays. This reduction is due to the relatively small cross sectional dimensions of the creek and its sinuous AG£N SEP 1 5 1998 nature. Excavation in these areas to erda'ge them to the average cross section of the creek will significantly increase tidal flow in the creek without the destruction ofmangroves. If the flooding tendencies of the upper (northern) bays are to be reduced, the hydraulic efficiency of the tidal creeks will have to be improved and openings will have to be made in the berrns surrounding the isolated smaller bays (a discussion of existing and proposed efforts to re-estabhsh flow to the isolated interior bays can be found in Section and an efficient flow channel will have to be maintained between Clam Pas,; and the southern terminus of the tidal The cuts which are intended to relieve the constrictions in the main channels flowing to the north flora Clam Pass are identified in this Plan as Cuts 1, 2, and 3. For Cut 1, which is immediately south of Upper Clam Bay, a depth of-3 fl. NGVD and a maximum bottom width of 15 feet are proposed. Spoil excavated fi.om Cuts 1, 2, and 3 (Figure 4.5.2 (h and k)) is to be deposited in spoil areas behind the beach drive. The resulting channels will retain their sinuous nature to the fullest extent possible. No mangroves will be removed except where absolutely essential to the implementation of the Plan and the volume of excavated material has been designed to minimize the amount removed. Cut 4 is shown on Figure 4.5.2 (1) and consists of Clam Pass, the main cut leading into Clam Bay and the cut leading south to Outer Clam Bay. Spoil will be deposited in spoil area south of Calm Pass. Project # 3 - Interior Tidal Creeks The existing interior tidal creek system of Clam Bay consists of three conditions distributed throughout Clam Bay. The three conditions are: 1) nonexis/ent, 2) restricted or blocked, and 3) restored. AL1 of these factors have combined to retard the function of the tidal channels with the result being that they are beginning to silt in some places and in others the tidal channels no longer exist. This has resulted in the loss of natural channel maintenance processes with the consequence being that the interior tidal channels are in many areas of Clam Bay totally filled in (nonexistent) or on a track to be totally filled in absent some effort at restoration (restricted or blocked). It is proposed that an additional 32963 linear feet of restored channels of four types be constructed in phases in Clam Bay (Figure 4.5.3(0), (c) and (dl) and (d2). The four proposed types of restored channels are: SEP 1 5 1998 .,/ · 1. Internal Main Channels being approximately 96" wide and 24" deep for a total distance within Clam Bay of 380 linear feet (Yellow). · 2. Internal Side Channels being approximately 36" wide and 12" to 18" deep for a total dis.ance of 8318 linear feet (Light Blue). · 3. Internal Lateral Channels being 6" to 12" wide and 12" deep for a total distance of 11918 linear feet (Green). · 4. Internal swales being approximately 3" to 6" wide and 6' to 12" deep for a total distance of 12347 linear feet (Dark Blue). If fully implemented these construction activities will generate a total of 2281 cubic yards of material. The material will be disposed of on site by careful placement in adjacent mangrove areas and in such a fashion so as not to create concentrated piles of spoil nor create blockages to existing and proposed drainage. Project # 4 - Seagate Culverts The Seagate Culverts are located at the extreme south end of Outer Clam Bay and serve as the connec6on point to Venetian Bay to the south. The culverts allow water to be exchanged between Outer Clam Bay and Venetian Bay through three twent2:'-four inch diameter culverts. The culverts are topped by Seagate Drive, a private thoroughfare connecting to developed land lying adjacent to the Gulf of Mexico. The Management Plan intends to take advantage ofthe flows through the culverts on the flood cycle by retaining the volume of water generated on the north side of the culverts (the Clam Bay side) for discharge through Clam Pass. This is to be accomplished by the installation of flap gates or a comparable product designed to preclude the oscillation of the tides through the culverts. Modified as proposed, the culverts will effectively operate as a pump, pushing water from Venetian Bay to Clam Bay. The culverts and headwalls :vill be replaced and appropriate check valves installed. Construction of the improvements will require excavation around the northerly end of the culverts, placement of a coffer dam during construction of the end wall, replacement of the 1,'31/9g-:)0616 Vet 03~-DNach N0103-0~?.406- £1~A -20520 culverts, placement of the check valves, backflling behind the end wall, and installation of rip- rap. Existing plant material will be removed and preserved for reinstallation to the extent feasible. Any destruction of roadways will be repaired. 1. SCOPE OF SERVICES: The ENGINEER shall provide professional services in general accordance with the following scope: 1,I. Pre-Design survey for Project 3 and 4 1.1.1. For Project 3, provide up to 10 (8-hour) days of field crew time to locate interior tide creeks flagged by Robin Lewis. 1.1.2. For Project 4, provide up to 1.5 (8-hour) days of field crew time. 1.2, Construction Plans and Technical Specifications for Projects 3 and 4 1.2.1. Attend one pre-design meeting. 1.2.2. Prepare construction plans for Projects 3 and 4. Each project will be designed as a separate set of plans. Robin Lewis will provide (ACAD form) the design plan, cross-sections, detailed technical specifications and blasting plan for Project 3.. Wilson lW__dler will prepare the cover information and engineering details for both projects. 1.2.3. Prepare technical specifications for Project 4. 1.3. Contract and Bidding Documents for Projects 3 and 4 1.3.1. Prepare bidding quantities and opinion ofcost for Project 4. Robin Lewis will provide Collier County Purchasing with the technical specifications, bidding quantities, and opinion of cost for Project 3. 1.3.2. Collier County Pumha.dng and Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD) will assemble the bidding d.ocuments and bid the Projects. 1.3.3. For Project 4, assist Collier County Purchasing and PBSD with contractor selection. Attend the pre-bid and bid opening meetings. SEP 1 5 l,q 8 1.3.4. Robin Lewis will assist Collier Country Purchasing and PBSD with Project 3. 1.4. 1,5. Construction Phase Services for Project 1.4.1. 1.4.2. 1.4.3. 1.4.4. Construction Phase Services for Project 4 1.5.1. Set horizontM and vertical survey construction. 1.5.2. 1.5.3. 1.5.4. 1.5.5. 1.5.6. 1.5.7. Set horizontal and vertical survey control for the contractor's use. Attend one pre-con, ruction meeting and two construction progress meetings. Provide up to 10 (g-hour) days of field crew time to field measure completed quantities for pay estimate and record drawing purposes. Robin Lewis will provide all other construction related services. control for the contractor's use during Attend one pre-construction meeting and two construction progress meetings. Field measurement of completed quantities for pay estimate purposes. Preparation of field reports of contractor's progress. Process pay requests and change orders. Conduct final inspection of work. Prepare record drawings based on certified record information prepared by contractors. ].6. 1.5.8. Prepare Certificate of Substantial Completion to PBSD for site improvements. Reimbursable Expenses . 2. TIME OF PERFORMANCE: N0103-.0 TIt-006..£PSA. 20 $ 20 SEP I 5 998 ,o .M'/ Item 1.1 will be completed within thirty (30) days of the completion of the flagging of the interior tidal creeks. Item 1.2 will be completed within ninety (90) days after completion of Item 1.1, except for delays beyond the control ofthe ENGINEER.. The remainder of the scope items will be completed in accordance with the schedule developed during the design phase. 3. FEES TO BE PAID: The ENGINEER shall be paid for his services at the hourly rates shown in the COb,~ENSATION SCHEDULE provided in the January 21, 1987, Agreement between the Pel. ican Bay Improvement District and ENGINEER which has been amended from time to time with an amount not to exceed $45,100.00, without approval by the COUNTY. Payments shall be made upon monthly billing Payable within thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice acceptable to the COUNTY. tN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above written. DATED: ATTEST: 1,31,9~-306 I~. Vrr 03~-DN~:h Ne 103.-071-,006- E PS^. 20520 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AGEn0& ITE~ ~ SEP 1 5 tgg8 Dwight E. Brock, Clerk By: Barbara Berry, Chairperson Deputy Clerk Witness WILSON, MILLER, INC. Stephen ~. Means Vice President BARTON & PEEK, Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David ~eige~',-Cou~ Attorney FAXMEMO To: Kyle Lukasz. Pelican Bay Services Division. Collier County Government From: Robin Lewis, Lewis Environmental Services, Inc. (LES) ~ J?,, .'~ Date: March 14. 1998 Re: Revised Proposal for Professional Services, Phases 1,2 and 3 Restoration. Clam Bay As referenced above, this proposal covers professional services related to final design and construmion of all three phases of the internal mangrove drainage channels consistent with the Clam Bay Restoration Plan as permitted by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and the U. S. Army Corps of Engineers. It is a revision to a previous proposal submitted on October 28, 1997 and reflects our phone conversations with Dorothea Zysko on March 13, 1998. The total, not-to-exceed cost estimate is $146.080 with 560,450 estimated for Phase I, $50,000 estimated for Phase 2, and $35.630 estimated for Phase 3. The cost differential between phases reflects the fact that the layout and final design of the first phase necessitates the careful delineation of the adjacent phases as boundaries, and requires the establishment of access corridors and methods of construction that will not have to be repeated in later phases. I appreciate your forwarding me a copy of the detailed proposal breakdown format provided by Steve Means. It is not possible for me to provide a similar breakdown since the work proposed is only my best estimate ofthe time required. We are wi,ing to commit to these numbers as not-to-exceed, as we have in previous proposals, but I cannot guarantee that we won't request a si'rift of funds from one category to another as the project proceeds. We will not bill more than these numbers, and likely will bill less. since they are not lump sums. but are billed only as actual hours and costs are incurred. It is the nature ofthe work tasks that require a great deal ofhand-holding on our part, and we cannot easily predict exactly how many hours it will require to supervise a crew that may vary each day from 4-8 people in 1-3 locations at one time. Mr. Dennis, who has previously successfully supervised the crews that completed the current very functional drainage system, not only must super,'ise and report accurately the hours worked and work completed, but must demonstrate the techniques to be used and assist in the work itself as crew size varies from day to day. In addition, we have discussed with Dorothea the need to beginning training one ofher staffso that some future portion of the work can be reviexved by someone resident in Naples instead of the need to always have someone from LES drive to Naples. I have no problem with this and acknowledge that it is our responsibility ',o help reduce the overall cost of xhe restoration, where appropriate, wi~.~ ~, _,5~~ Page 2 compromising the quality of the final work product. With this in minck we have eliminated $6.750 in expenses in Tasks 3 and 4 which brings the total cost of supervision of these tasks very close or equivalent to that estimated by Wilson Miller, given that their estimate was for 200 hours ofstafftime and my estimate for Mr. Denni~ was for 40 hours in Task 3 and 370 hours in Task 4 (total 410 hours). Please feel free to contact Mr. Dennis or myself i.f any additional questions arise. A detailed description of the Phase I proposal follows: Task (I) complete a final design. including field identification and staking (2) assist with the preparation ora scope of services, request for bids and review bids for the necessary labor and materials to complete the mangrove drainage channels under the supervision of LES. (3) attend and participate in any required Division coordination meetings, prebid or preconstruction meetings. (4) supervise the selected contractor in the performance of the required work in accordance with the issued permits, including any preconstruction notifications, and provide the District and the Construction Engineer with daily reports of man-power participating, hours worked and work completed in order to insure proper payments for work performed and solve any problems encountered during construction and. (5) document through photography and the above referenced reports the final completion of aL1 work and prepare a final report to the District and the Construction Engineer describing the work performed, the time frame and any changes required by on- site conditions. TI'tis task includes prepar:~tion of the Second Annual Report for the project as a whole, including all data from the other project participants. Cost Proposal Task I. Final Design - Phase I Personnel R. Lewis. 40 mh X 5125 R Dennis. $0 mh X $60 S. Skidmore, 20 mh X $60 S. Portz. 20 mh X $35 Expenses 15 days meals and lodging Mileage - 2500 mi X .35 X $135 Subtotal # 1 $5.000 4.800 1.200 70O 2.025 875 $14.600 SEPt 5 998 Page 3 Task 2. Bid Preparation and Revie~v Personnel R. Lewis. 10 mh X $125 R Dennis, 20 mh X $60 S. Portz. I0 rah X $35 Expenses Federal Express Subtotal #2 $1.250 1.200 35O 50 $ 2.850 Task 3. Meetings Personnel R. Lewis. 40 mh X $125 R Dennis. 40 rah X $60 S. Portz. 20 mh X S35 Expenses Mileage - 2500 mi X .35 Task 4. Supen'ise Work Personnel R. Lewis. 30 mb. X $125 R Dennis. 370 mh X $60 S. Skidmore. 20 mh X $60 S. Portz. 50 rnh X S35 Expenses Mileage - 2500 mi X .35 Subtotal ~:3 Subtotal $5.000 2.400 700 875 $ 8,975 3.750 22.200 1.200 1.750 875 $29.725 SEP 5 1 98 Page 4 Task 5. Final Reporting Including Second Annual Report Personnel ~'~. Lewis, 10 mh X $125 R Dennis. 40 mh X $60 s. Portz. 10 mh X $35 Expenses Federal Express Film Processing Subtotal #5 $1.250 2.400 350 50 250 $ 4,300 Total S60.450 It is ass that Phases 2 and 3 will include the same tasks as outlined in above. Pr, ion of the 3'~. 4"' and 5~ Annual Reports, including dar project panic is included in Tasks 10 and 15. ietail other Task 6. Final Design - Personnel R. R S. S. Expenses 15 days meals Mileage - 25, Lewis. 20 mh 5 Dennis. 40 rah X Skidmore. 10 mh X Portz. 20 mh X $35 ging X $135 X .35 Task 7. Bid Prep and Reviexv - Phase 2 ~6 $2.500 2.400 600 700 2.025 875 $ 9.100 R Dennis. 10 mh X $60 S. Portz . 5 mh X $35 ' Expenses Federal Express Subtotal 6O0 825 SEP 1 Page 5 8. Meetings Exp~ R. Lewis. 20 mh X $125 R Dennis, 20 mh X $60 S. Portz, 10 mh X $35 meals and lodging X $135 e - 1500 mi X .35 Task 9. Supervise Work - Personnel R. R S. S. Expenses Lewis. I0 mh X Dennis. 370 rnh X Skidmore. 10 mh X Portz, 40 mh X $35 40 days meals and lc ag Mileage - 2500 35 X$1. Task I O. Final Personnel 10 rah X $125 Dennis, 20 rah X $60 S. Portz, 10 mh X $35 Federal Express Film Processing Subtotal total e9 Subtotal # 10 Total ;00 1,200 35O 675 525 $ 5.250 ! .250 22.200 600 1.400 5.400 875 $31.725 $1.250 ! .200 350 $3. $50.000 SEP 1 5 1998 Page 6 Task 11. Final Design - Phase 3 Personnel R. R S. 'riSeS Lewis. 5 mh X $125 Dennis, 20 mil X $60 Portz. 20 mh X $35 5 days meals and lodging X $t 35 - 1,000 mi X .35 Subtotal #11 $6 1 )0 675 350 3,600 Task 12. Bid Pn ,n and Review - Phase 3 Personnel R Dermi: rnfi X S60 S. Portz. X $35 Expenses Federal Express Subtotal # 12 600 175 5O $ 825 Task 13. Meetings Personnel R. LewSs. 10 R Dennis. 2 S. Portz, I Expenses 3 days $125 X $60 X $35 Is and lodging X $135 I000 mi X ,35 SuN~ #13 $1.__0 1.200 350 405 350 $ 3,550 Task 14. :rvise Work - Phase 3 R Dennis. 300 mh X $60 W. Skidmore. 10 mh X $60 S. Ponz. 20 rah X $35 Expenses 35 days meals and lodging X $135 Mileage - 1500 mi X .35 Subtotal #14 18.000 600 700 725 $24 EP 1 5 Page 7 Final Reporting ~el R S. Portz, Expenses 10 mh X $125 20 mh X $60 $35 Federal Express Film Processing #15 Grand Total $1.250 1.200 350 50 250 $ 3,100 $35.635 CC: Shen)' Portz Ray Dennis Lark Holden Dorothea Zysko Proposal #98001 SEP 1 5 1998 ~uly 29, 199g TACKNEY & ASSOCIATES, INC, COASTAL ENGINEERING g385 NORTH 561h STREET SUITE 309 TEMPLE TERRACE, FLORIDA 33617 813 / 988-9498 Mr. Kyle Lucasz Pelican Bay Services Division 801 Laurel Oak Ddve, Suite 605 Naples, FL 34108 RE: Clam Bay Proposal Dear Kyle: In order to allow Humiston and Moore to prepare the plans and specification for the dredge project I would recommend the following: I provide them with a summary, of the bathymet~' that was used to prepare the computer model. I meet with you and Ken for a field review ofthe channels, creeks, spoil disposal sites dredge methods, and water level control. I remain available for questions or possible assistance until a dredge contract contract is awarded. I would estimate the first two items will require approximately 26 hours of my time. wh/ch is billable at $95 per hour and about $200 for expenses. It is somewhat difficult to estimate the time required for the third item but I would recommend that an allowance for an additional 10 hours be made. For accounting purposes I would estimate that approximately half of my time would deal with dredging in the tidal creeks and the other half would deal with dredging of the channel to Outer Claim Bay. Very truly you~~ P.E. Tacknev & ,Msociates, Inc. DTT/ew SEP 1 5 1998 PROPOSAL FOR SLIYRRY-WATEK DISPOSAL ~-FECi'S MON1TOKLNG Fax to: From: Dam: Kyle Lucas, Pelican Bay Se.wic.~ Division (941) 597-5400. S~nuel C. Srmdaker, consultant 2I O~tober 1997 On the first day of d~dgin§ and rdtmS,-wamr disposal into ttm d~ignamd man_move ama. I propose that you. and pos.tiNy David Tackney, be on sim to observe how the slur~ wa~r d.i~enes and the extant to which it is confin,d within tl:m mangrove ama. Since disposal involves a very large volume of wamr. it may move as surface sheet flow out of tl~ ar~ and not be totally retained. On that day or tim next, phone me with a report At daybreak on the morning of thc third.or fourth day of flurry disposal and prior tn tim iniri~t?on o.f?cdgiu_g on tha~ day, I Ix?pose thnT yOU and I: (I) ~ file e. tltifl~ di~oosal ~. ~or evloellge of d~l:ltl ponding, s~enmion, and surfac.~ erosion, (2) ~e~__n~,_n,,gr?ves in.tl~..d;ispo, sal ar~ for any symptoms of acura stress, and (3) go over what u ~. u.e., monttorj ~or during my absence from the .sit~., and then call mc if you observe a.uything what.soever that at~~ to be tu:t~_ I will also slay on sit~ ti:mi day dining dredging that day to observe tl~ par~m of flurry wa~r dizpersal and tl~ consequ~t ~cdimenmtion, erosion, mc., and whethm- ~ surf~e c~bris (I~aves, twigs, prop~gules, etc.) is rafting. Sometime around tt~ lOth day following the initiation of dredging, I propose tt~ you and m-visit the disposal ar~ beginning ax daybreak, and examine_ tim mangroves for any evidence of incipient chronic stra~. If none is found, I will give you mon~ d~{ail~ on what to monitor them altar. If. however, the mangroves at that time exhibk any si~ of poremially non-reversible stress, we will consult with oU~_~ ~nd possibly r~commend that slurry dixposal in the mangroves be stopped. Mid-way throu~ the dredging, I propose that you and I will ag-a.in m-vixit ~c xite for a derailed examination of tha effects of prior flurry wamr disposal The main purpose of thi~ visit will be to look for other evi~nce of detrimental effects that may not have b~en obsen-ed earlier. This would mmimally.r~uim tl:u'cc days of field work pitts overnight accommod~ons on the nights prcr~ding the field inspections - this equams to a dollar cost of approxarnamly $2.000. However. if you or some one else notes something of consequence. I will be prepared to m~k~ an ad hoc visit(s) to confirm or evaluate his findings. For your information, beginnimg in January 1998. I am taacking md thm'e.t'ore will be routinely available only on Tuesdays and Thursdays (and of course, weekend~). However, i.f an "emergency" arises, I eau make_ arrangements to be available on most any My cantact numbers are office: (305) 3614624 and home: (305) 665-9854. AGtMD.~ l.TtJ~ ,~ SEP 1 5 1998 WOKK AUTHORIZATION This Work Authorization made and entered into this day of 1998, by and between the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY" and Wilson, ?s/filler, Barton & Peek, Inc., a Florida corporation, herein~er referred to as "ENGINEER". W1TNESSETH: WHEREAS, ENGINEER entered into an engineering agreement dated January 21, 1987, with the Pelican Bay Improvement District to perform general consulting services involving engineering` su~'eying` planning, environmental management, or permitting, financial or economic feasibility studies, water and sewer utilities, water management facilities, street lighting facilities and other infrastructure and cMl-type Projects for the Pelican Bay Improvement District, as defined by supplemental agreements; and WHEREAS, the Pelican Bay Improvement District was dissolved and under the Plan of dissolution, COUNTY assumed the rights and obligations of all contracts for services and materials to which the Pelican Bay Improvements District was a party; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the agreement between ENGINEER and the Pelican Bay Improvement District, COUNTY wishes to contract with ENGFNrEER to provide engineering services for Projects ser,,'ing the Pelican Bay area. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits which will accrue to the parties hereto in carrying out the terms of this Work Authorization, it is mutually understood and a~eed as follows: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The Project consists of the design, bidding, and construction phase services associated with a portion of the "Clam Bay Restoration and Management Plan". The purpose of the plan is to set forth a coherent and task oriented package of practical solutions for the restoration of the Clam Bay ecosystem and the regeneration of the dying mangroves. The following scope of services outlines the work necessary to accomplish the construction portion of the plan. ~,31~8.~0~10 Vet. 03'-DNm:h For bidding and contracting purposes, the Proje~l is separated into smaller Projects as follows: Project Project description Management Plan Section Number 1 Clam Pass Tidal Creeks 4.5.2 Cuts 1, 2, and 3 2 Clam Pass Main Channel 4.5.2 Cut 4 3 Interior Tidal Creeks 4.5.3 4 Sea,ate Culverts 4.5. l The separation into smaller Projects will provide flexibility in awarding the construmion contracts allowing the County to select up to four contractors to complele the entire Project. Initial conversations with marine and dredging contractors indicate that because the work encompasses various contracting specialties, most contractors will not want to bid the entire Project without large mark-ups on the sub-contracted portions. In addition, and because time is a factor in the completion of the Project, multiple contractors can finish the Project in less time than one contractor can. Projects 1 and 2 - Clam Pass Tidal Creeks and Main Channel Field studies revealed two different conditions that contribute to the observed mangrove mortality. The tidal creeks leading north from Clam Pass and the two upper bays are surrounded by a berm with acres! elevation of between approximately 1.4 and 1.8 fl. NGVD Landward of this berm the ground elevations generally decrease and then rise again. As a result, the berm functions as a dike which separates the tidal creeks and upper bays from smaller embayments within the mangrove forest. The second condition wNch contributes to prolonged periods of flooding results from the existing geometry and bathymetry of the bays and connecting tidal creeks and flow channels. The tidal creek leading north fi-om Clam Pass is narrow and extremely sinuous. Although ;.he average creek depth is approximately 2.5 ft. NGVD, two areas of localized constriction were noted and in one of these areas, the maximum creek depth was less than -1 ft.. NGVD. In addition, the northern end of the creek connecting Inner Clam Bay and Upper Clam Bay is extremely constricted. The reduced tides in the upper bays are due to the high resistance to flow offered by the tidal creek and the reduced tidal range at the southern entrance to the creek.. The restricted condition of the tidal creeks also dramatically reduces the tidal range in the upper bays. This reduction is due to the relatively small cross sectional dimensions of the creek and its sinuous · ,,,,~.x~,6 ,,~, ~ -~,,,,,., / ~/~,ff"- nature. Excavation in these areas to enlarge them to the average cross section ofthe creek will significantly increase tidal flow in the creek without the destruction of mangroves. If the flooding tendencies of the upper (northern) bays are to be reduced, the hydraulic efficiency of the tidal creeks will have to be improved and openings will have to be made in the berms surrounding the isolated smaller bays (a discussion of existing and proposed efforts to re-establish flow to the isolated interior bays can be found in Section and an efficient flow channel will have to be maintained between Clam Pass and the southern terminus of the tidal creeks. The cuts which are intended to relieve the constrictions in the main channels flowing to the north from Clam Pass are identified in this Plan as Cuts 1, 2, and 3. For Cut 1, which is immediately south of Upper Clam Bay, a depth of-3 ft. NGVD and a maximum bottom width of 15 feet are proposed. Spoil excavated from Cuts 1, 2, and 3 (Figure 4.5.2 (h and k)) is to be deposited in spoil areas behind the beach drive. The resulting channels will retain their sinuous nature to the fullest ex'tent possible. No mangroves will be removed except where absolutely essential to the implementation of the Plan and the volume of excavated material has been designed to minimize the amount removed. Cut 4 is shown on Figure 4.5.2 (1) and consists of Clam Pass, the main cut leading into Clam Bay and the cut leading south to Outer Clam Bay. Spoil will be deposited in spoil area south of Calm Pass. Project # 3 - Interior Tidal Creeks The existing interior tidal creek system of Clam Bay consists of three conditions distributed throughout Clam Bay. The three conditions are: 1) nonexistent, 2) restricted or blocked, and 3) restored. All of these factors have combined to retard the function of the tidal channels with the result being that they are beginning to silt in some places and in others the tidal channels no longer exist. This has resulted in the loss of natural channel maintenance processes with the consequence being that the interior tidal channels are in many areas of Clam Bay totally filled in (nonexistent) or on a track to be totally filled in absent some effort at restoration (restricted or blocked). It is proposed that an additional 32963 linear feet of restored channels of four types be constructed in phases in Clam Bay (Figure 4.5.3(b), (c) and (dl) and (d2). The four proposed types of restored channels are: 1/3 I.'9~06 [ 6 V~' N0103.-0T8-006- £ PSA.2f1520 · 1. Internal Main Channels being approximately 96" wide and 24" deep for a total distance within Clam Bay of 380 linear feet (Yellow). · 2. Internal Side Channels being approximately 36" wide and 12" to 18" deep for a total distance of 8318 linear feet (Light Blue). · 3. Internal Lateral Channels being 6" to 12" wide and 12" deep for a total distance of I 1918 linear feet (Green). · 4. Internal swales being approximately 3" to 6" wide and 6" to 12" deep for a total distance of 12347 linear feet (Dark Blue). If fully implemented these construction activities will generate a total of 2281 cubic yards of material. The material will be disposed of on site by careful placement in adjacent mangrove areas and in such a fashion so as not to create concentrated piles of spoil nor create blockages to existing and proposed drainage. Project # 4 - Seagate Culverts The Seagate Culverts are located at the extreme south end of Outer Clam Bay and serve as the connection point to Venetian Bay to the south. The culverts allow water to be exchanged between Outer Clam Bay and Venetian Bay through three twenty-four inch diameter culverts. The culverts are topped by Seagate Drive, a private thoroughfare connecting to developed land lying adjacent to the Gulf of Mexico. The Management Plan intends to take advantage of the flows through the culverts on the flood cycle by retaining the volume of water generated on the north side of the culverts (the Clam Bay side) for discharge through Clam Pass. This is to be accomplished by the installation of flap gates or a comparable product designed to preclude the oscillation &the tides through the culverts. Modified as proposed, the culverts will effectively operate as a pump, pushing water fi.om Venetian Bay to Clam Bay. The culverts and headwalls will be replaced and appropriate check valves installed. Construction of the improvements will require excavation around the northerly end of the culverts, placement of a coffer dam during construction of the end wall, replacement of the culverts, placement of the check valves, backfilling behind the end wall, and installation of rip- rap. Existing plant material will be removed and preserved for reinstallation to the extent feasible. Any destruction of roadways will be repaired. SCOPE OF SERVICES: The ENGINEER shall provide professional services in general accordance with the following scope: 1.1. Pre-Design survey for Project 3 and 4 1.1.1. For Project 3, provide up to 10 (8-hour) days of field crew time to locate interior tide creeks flagged by Robin Lewis. 1.1.2. For Project 4, provide up to 1.5 (8-hour) days of field crew time. 1.2. Construction Plans and Technical Specifications for Projects 3 and 4 1.2.1. Attend one pre-design meeting. 1.2.2. Prepare construction plans for Projects 3 and 4. Each project will be designed as a separate set of plans. Robin Lewis will provide (ACAD form) the design plan, cross-sections, detailed technical specifications and blasting plan for Project 3. Wilson Miller will prepare the cover information and engineering details for both projects. 1.2.3. Prepare technical specifications for Project 4. 1.3. Contract and Bidding Documents for Projects 3 and 4 1.3.1. Prepare bidding quantities and opinion of cost for Project 4. Robin Lewis will provide Collier County Purchasing with the technical specifications, bidding quantities, and opinion of cost for Project 3. 1.3.2. Collier County. Purchasing and Pelican Bay Services Division (PBSD) will assemble the bidding documents and bid the Projects. 1.3.3. For Project 4, assist Collier County Purchasing and PBSD with contractor selection. Attend the pre-bid and bid opening meetings. 1.3.4. Robin Lewis will assist Collier Country Purchasing and PBSD with Project 3. 1.5. Construction Phase Services for Project 3 1.4.1. 1.4.2. 1.4.3. 1.4.4. Construction Phase Services for Project 4 1.5.1. 1.5.2. 1.5.3. 1.5.4. 1.5.5. 1.5.6. 1.5.7. Set horizontal and vertical survey control for the contractor's use. Attend one pre-construction meeting and two construction progress meetings. Provide up to I0 (8-hour) days of field crew time to field measure completed quantities for pay estimate and record drawing purposes. Robin Lewis will provide all other construction related services. Set horizontal and vertical survey control for the contractor's use during construction. Attend one pre-construction meeting and two construction progress meetings Field measurement of completed quantities for pay estimate purposes. Preparation of field reports of contractor's progress. Process pay requests and change orders. Conduct final inspection of work. Prepare record drawings based on certified record information prepared by contractors. 1.5.8. Prepare Certificate of Substantial Completion to PBSD for site improvements. 1.6. Reimbursable Expenses . TI31E OF PERFORMANCE: ~F31 '95.~1~, V~r 03',DN#ch Item 1.1 will be completed within thirty (30) days of the completion of the flagging of the interior tidal creeks. Item 1.2 will be completed within ninety (90) days after completion of' Item 1.1, except for delays beyond the control of the ENGINEER. The remainder of the scope items will be completed in accordance with the schedule developed during the design phase. 3. FEES TO BE PAID: The ENGINEER shall be paid for his services at the hourly rates shown in the COMPENSATION SCHEDULE provided in the January 21, 1987, Agreement between the Pelican Bay Improvement District and ENGINEER which has been amended fi.om time to time with an amount not to exceed $45,100.00, without approval by the COUNTY. Payments shall be made upon monthly billing Payable witkin thirty (30) days of receipt of an invoice acceptable to the COUNTY. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above written. DATED: ATTEST: Vet' ~,~0 ."1-0(~ E ~- 205~0 BOARD OF COUNqr'Y COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Dwight E. Brock, Clerk By:_ Barbara Berry,, Chairperson Deputy Clerk Witness \ WILSON, MEX.ER, BARTON & PEEK, I~lC. /~ Stephen A. Means Vice President Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David Weigel, C~}nty Attorney ExECuTIVE SUMMARY APPROVE A CONTRACT INCREASE FOR COMMERCIAL LAND MAINTEN~CE, INC. WHICH EXCEEDS TEN PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT. OBJECTIVE: To obtain Board approval for an increase exceeding ten percent (10%) of the ori~nal amount of Golden Gate Parkway Grounds Maintenance Contract #95-2418. CONSIDERATIONS: At their regular meeting on ~ber 9, 1997, the Golden Gate Beautification Advisory Committee requested additional services from Commercial Land Maintenance, the Grounds Maintenance Contractor for Golden Gate Parkway median landscaping. The services requested were three additional mowing services and trash removal on interior medians in Golden Gate prior to and following the Christmas holiday. The Contractor invoiced these services to MSTD 3 at rates stipulated in its current contract (#95-2418), for a total of $6,685.79. The invoices were paid against Purchase Order #801642 for Golden Gate Parkway Grounds Maintenance. Staffhas requested a Journal entry to back-charge the Golden Gate Beautification MSTU for the cost of these services, became they were performed at the Advisory Committee's request. The funds collected from the MSTU for this purpose will not be encumbered on the Purc~e Order automatically. The contract must be increased to accommodate charges from the Contractor for the remainder of the Fiscal Year. Although the dollar amount requested is six percent (6%) of the current contract amount, the total cumulative rate of increase to the contract is twelve percent (12%). An increase of this size requires Board approval. FISCAL IMPACT: Funds to increase this contract in the amotmt of $6,685.79 will be made available in Fund 104--163646-634999 as a result of a Journal Entry. The Golden Gate Beautification MSTU will provide this amount from their Fund (136-162590-634999). ~NT I~MPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Coanty Commissioners approve an increase to Commercial Land Maintenance's current Contract (095-2418) in the amount of $6,685.79, for the cost of services flint were performed on behalf of tile Golden Gate Beautification MSTU. SEP I 5 lg$8 Commercial Land Maintenance Executive Summary Page 2 PREPARED BY: ~ ff'~,~,,-~ ,/~,,c' cc" Val Prince, Engineer II Stephen Y. Camell, Purchasing Director Edwe..~J./~/~E~.a~sportation'Services Director Ed II~chn"~,, F~oTi-c ~/or~ Administrator DATE: DATE: SC/~ crncrg increase.doc SEP 1 5 1Ss8 Golden Gate Beautification Adv sorv Committee Minutes - Meeting of December 9, 1997 Meeting called to order at 4:05 p.m. at the Golden Gate Community Center. Roll Call Present: Cheryle Newman. Bonner Bacon, Mark Houghton. Charles McMahon (4:35), Sabina Musci (4:50) members: Val Prince and Steve Fabiano. Transportation Administrative Services: Mike McGee. McGee & Associates: Chuck Buckley, Commercial Land Maintenance: Jacqueline Silano. secretary. 3. Minutes to the meeting of November 12. 1997: Corrections - ,4C - change word base to bonnet;, 69. second paragraph - change second sentence to read Mike recommended extending the services to Route 75 .... Mark Houghton made a motion to accept the minutes as amended: seconded by Bonner Bacon and carried unanimously. 4. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT Chuck Buckley advised that red and white begonias were planted on November 21' fertilizer and herbicide have been applied: there are no irrigation problems: the Christmas ornaments were installed: canopy tree pruning has begun as per the contract specifications: he has also pruned the palms. 5. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S REPORT A. Mike McGee requested that Mr. Buckley check on the new plants for missing and dead ones and to fill in with lirope 6. TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Copies of the budget status through November. 1997 ',,','ere distributed and reviewed. Steve Fabiano also provided copies of a breakdown regarding the funding (funds 136 and 104). Steve also noted that the additional services for Commercial Land Maintenance that was discussed last month will require a bid if it exceeds $25,000. There was a lengthy discussion regarding funding and the number of services that can be afforded. Val Prince provided copies of a memorandum from Mark Burtchin, District Supervisor of Road and Bridge, which says that the area is mowed at a cost of $8.50 per acre per cut and that the services are performed eight times per year. Mike McGee estimated this to be about $25.50 per mile (3 acres per mile). Since the memo made no sense to anyone at the meeting, Mark Houghton will send a letter to Dave Bobanick. Transportation pA~A~TTACHM£NT NO. _ SEP I 5 1998 ~G. ~ D~rector, requesting an accurate analysis of the total costs per mile for mowing the road shoulders, medians and trash pick up. C. After further discussion. Chuck McMahon made a motion authorizing up to a maximum of ten additional services to maintain the arterial and collector roadway medians as per the quoted cost dated November 12, 1997 by Commercial Land Maintenance, to be performed on an as- needed bas~s; seconded by Mark Houghton and carried unanimously. D. Steve had E.B Simmonds check the lights at the C.R. 951 sign and they quoted a cost of $735 for material and labor to repair the lights and move them closer to the sign. To replace and relocate the lights. it would cost $1670. After some discussion, Mark Houghton made a motion to repair and relocate the lights as per Option A as quoted by E.8. Simmonds at a cost of $735; seconded by Bonner Bacon and carried unanimously. E. Mr. Fabiano provided draft copies of an Executive Summary regarding the Arterial Roadway Landscape Improvement Funding Partnership with the Golden Gate Beautification M.S.T.U, for C.R. 951. A copy was also provided to Dave Bobanick two weeks ago for his review. A discussion ensued regarding the fiscal impact which will be contingent on the availability of funds in Fund 313. Val Prince reviewed the recommendation shown on page 3. Cheryle Newman will meet w~th Commissioner Constantine to discuss further. F. As a contingency plan. Val Prince is preparing a draft regarding amendments to the Collier County SIreetscape Masler Plan to include Part B of C.R. 951 for fiscal year 1998/99. 7. NEW BUSINESS Mike McGee. Joe Delate and Bonner Bacon met with Mike Whittenberg and Russ Muller and other Participants of the ISTEA Rural Safety Refuge grant to discuss the pilot programs. Mike McGee presented an alternate design layout and cost estimates. Waste Management agreed to purchase all the receptacles and pick up waste. A member of the School Board Transportation Department ,,vas also present and advised that since students are picked up on both sides of the road. they did not want a facility built that would draw children across the street. As there ,,','as no fudher business to discuss, the meeting adjourned at 5:45 p m. The next meeting will be held at 4:00 p.m on January 13. 1998 at the Golden Gate Community Center. SEP 1 5 1998 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BOARD APPROVAL OF ATTACHED RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COLLIER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN ~ To gain Board of County Commissioners' approval of the attached Resolution adopting the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan for Collier County. CONSIDERATION.._ There have been many advances made in emergency planning since Hurricane Andrew moved through South Florida on August 24, 1992. Because the response to most natural or technological disasters is similar, it was appropriate that governments develop an "ali hazards" approach to emergency planning. It was also recommended that the voluminous plans that we are currently maintaining for peace time emergencies, hazardous material response and nuclear civil protection be reduced to one stand-alone document. The Federal Government developed the Federal Response Plan with 12 Emergency Support Functions (ESFs). The State of Florida developed the State Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan with 16 ESFs in February 1996. An additional ESF for Veterinary Services was created in 1997. Collier County Emergency Management began a collaborative effort in reformatting the existing plan with several County government departments, volunteer groups and community social service agencies in July 1997. Eighteen emergency support functions with lead and support agencies were established. Disaster & Trauma Management Initiatives, Inc. (DTMI) was retained to assist Emergency Management in facilitating the development of the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. A review team consisting of members from the State Division of Emergency Management and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council reviewed the plan from May 28 - 30, 1998. We have included all of their .suggestions as well as the compliance criteria into the finished product. ~Fi'SCAL IMPAC'~: The total cost of consulting services for this project was $9,000. All monies were obtained from the Emergency Management Preparedness and Enhancement Grant Fund 118 (Emergency Management & Fire Grants), Cost Center 144210 (Emergency Management Administration), Project 33781 (Emergency Management Preparedness & Enhancement Grant). S £P 1 § GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: None. RECOMMENDATION: That the Board of Count Commissi . attached Resolution adopting the Collier Count,, C,', .... ~__.:.._ ,-. oners approve the .~ ~'-,t.,,~,,~-~ve t:.mergency Management Plan. The complete document is on file in the Emergency Management Department. PP~PAKED ~ REVIEWED BY: Date: ~ q~ Ke~.xh.g. Pineau, Emergency Management Directo-r - Date: , Chief Diane Flagg, Emergency Services Director APPROVED BY: . ; / · " i I 1, '" , Date: ,' ":. Leo C~s, Jr., Support Services Administrator 1 2 3 $ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 2.1 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 3~ 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 BY: 46 45 $2 RESOLUTION NO. 98 - _ RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, ADOPTING COLLIER COUNTY'S COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, Chapter 252, Florida Statutes, assigns to the Board of County Commissioners the responsibility for prepahng for, responding to, recovering from and mitigating the effects of all potential natural or technological disasters; and WIIEREAS, Section 252.38, Florida Statutes, authorizes and directs that each Florida county, by actions of/ts Board of County Commissioners, establish a county organization for Emergency Management Services; and WHEREAS, Flor/da Administrative Code, Rule 9G-6.006, requires that Collier County submit to the Florida State Division of Emergency Management a tr/ermial update of the County's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan; and WHEREAS, Florida Administrative Code, Rule 9G-6.007, requires, after determination by the Florida Division of Emergency Management that the Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan is in compliance, that the County pass a Resolution adopting the County's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR/DA that Collier County's Comprehensive Emergency Management Plan, as revised in August, 1998, attached hereto as "Exhibit A", is hereby adopted. The Plan is held in a three ring notebook. The Plan consists of the "Basic Plan" Sections I through VII, Appendices AI-I through AV-II, Annex I (ESF-I through ESF-18), Annex II ("Recovery and Mitigation") and Acronyms. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote in favor of adoption this --.-..--_ day of__ _, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLOI:LIDA Deputy Clerk BY: BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN _1o.,, · Thomas C. Palmer -- Assistant County Attorney SEP 1 5 1998 .EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO AWARD BID #98-2818 FOR FURNISHING AND DELIVERING HERBICIDES, PESTICIDES AND FUNGICIDES J~F=_Q_T~ To award Annual Bid #98-2818 for furnishing and delivering herbicides, pesticides and fungicides. CONSIDERATIONS_: On June 3, 1998, invitations to bid were posted and distributed to 61 vendors. On June 25, 1998, bids were received and opened from eight (8) vendors. Bids were requested for various types of chemicals and chemical spray additives for the Stormwater Management Department, Parks and Recreation Department and Pelican Bay Services Division. Proposals have been evaluated by the above-referenced Departments and staff is recommending that award of this bid be made to the following vendors on an item-by-item basis. Ansar(2.5G); Copper(5G); Colorant(1G); Direct Supplies Future Horizons Helena Chemical Lesco 2,4-D(2.SG); Adjuvant (2.5G); Aquathol K(5G & 30G); Arsenal (2.5G); Copper(1G & 2.5G); Ddft Control Agent(1G); Foaming Agent(2.5G); Gadon 3A(2.5G); Gadon 4(2.5G); K-Tea Liquid Copper(2.5G); Pathfinder 11(2.5G); Reward (2.5G); Round-up(2.5G); Sonar SRP(40#); Weedar 64 (5G); Malathion(1G); Orthene (4 bags); Cleary's 3336 (2#); Asulox(2.5G); Basagmn(1G); Surfactant(1G); Diazinon(1G & 40#); Orthene(l#&10#); Aliette(4x5~); Dithane WF(4x1.25); Lesco(2x2.5G); Terra Asgrow 2,4-D(50#); 24~D Ester(50#); Arsenal(2.5G); Buffer(2.5G); Drift(1G); Gadon 3A(2.5G); Gadon 4(2.5G); Reward (2.5G); Sencore DF(4XS); Sonar SRP(40#); Surflan AS(1G); Velpar(4~); Velpar iAG~NOR. ~TEM SEP15 1998 / _ Terra Asgrow Timberland Triax United Horticulture L(1G); Amdro(l#); Dursban 2E(1G & 2.5G); Mole Cricket Bait 1%(50#); Mole Cricket Bait 5%(50#); Pagent DF(5#); Seven 80 WSP (8xl.25); Slug & Snail Bait(25#); Aliette(1G); Chipco 26019(2#); Cleary's G(30#); Daconil 2787(2.5G); Subdue Max(1G); AquaShade(1G); Anti-Foam Agent(1 Pt); Arsenal(2.5G); Gar'Ion 3A(2.5G); Gadon 4(2.5G); Karmex(5~ & 50#); Velpar(4#); Velpar L (1G); Arsenal(2.5G); Gadon 3A(2.5G); Garlon 4(2.5G); Reward(2.SG); Rodeo(30G); Sonar SRP(40#); Surfactant(2.SG) Atrazine 4L(2.5G); Copper Sulfate(50#); Lesco Three Way(2.SG); MSMA(2.5G); Pramitol 25E(SG); Reward(2.SG); Rodeo (2~5G); Round-up (2.5G & 30G); Surflan AS(25G); Tempo('6xS00 mil); Subdue GR(25#); : It is estimated that approximately $450,000 will be expended during 98/99 under this contract. Funds are appropriated in the operating budgets of the using agencies. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Not applicable. -~=-C-DMMENDATION:That the Board of County Commissioners award Annual Bid #98- 2818 for Purchase and Delivery of Herbicides/Pesticides/Fungicides as shown herein. REVIEWED BY: REVIEWED BY: Gwen But!er,-Senior Buyer Stephed y. Camell, P'ur?hasJng Director Leo Ochs J~rator DATE: SEP 15 1998 AG~ NOA ~T£M Z Z :Z:i Z ~ _ Z Z Z Zl z z Zl Z Z i'~' = -. _~: .>_ ,,-, ,.~,,~ _ -.~ ~' Z i-- Z Z Z Z: 'Z __~ _ --' -- :7, <! <: .-..' j < < .,., i l"l ,'"' ~ ~ '-- I I :~< - z = _~ -, z: .~, i~ g_ Z: I - ,.= .- = , -,~ _ .,, .  ~ ~ --- = _ ,_ = ,... 0 _= - ~. ~, ,- '-' _ _ - -.-- ,.. '-'U = - _ - _._~ ~,.= ge: ~ ~, = _ '-,-- ,- ,- ,- ~ -- m .~ -__ '.~ ~ _ z ~' ?EP 15 1998 5 1998 1 5 1998 /0 Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ~, ~ ~ <~ <~ ITE~ 1 5 1998 p~. ITEM 15 1998 ZTrM EP 15 1998 ~.- /7_ ,I ~ z -," ~ > > z: I '~-- ~:, ,, Z Z Z Z , Z Z Z Z Z: I '- ~ - '- ~ ~ ~: ~ ' - i . , = ~ .= ~ ' t ~EI15 199B 1 5 1998 APPROVAL OF BUDGET AMENDMENTS BCC Agenda 9/15/98 Naples & Urban Collier County Community Park Impact Fee (Fund No. 368) Budget Amendment No. 98-338 Golden Gate Communiv,, Center Expansion Capital Outlay $4,396 Reser','e$ Reserves for Capital Outlay ($4,396) Total - 0 - E.~planation: The contractor incurred additional costs to adjust the lift station to match the yard piping invert elevations at the sewage lift station. Current Planning Personal Services Current Planning (Fund No. 113) Budget Amendment No. 98-398 Engineerin~ Inspection Operating Expenses ($8,700) Total $8,700 -0- Explanation: Funds are needed because of a budget shortfall in operations due to unexpected motor pool charges. Communily Development (Fund No. 113) Budget Amendment No. 98409 Development Complianc_~ Operating Expenses ($6,000) Code Enforcement Contractor~ License Operating Expenses $6,000 F~xt~lanatJon: Funds are needed for unanticipated expenses for services of the Clerk to the Board for the Contractor's Licensing Board. Support Services (Fund No. 001) Budget Amendment No. 98419 Grounds MainTenancg Operating Expenses $6,500 Custodial Service Other Contractual Service Total Explanalion: ($6,500) 0- ' . - .a,~£~LT. EM,G Funds are needed for landscaping work on and offthe Government Comple sateS.No. /~ ~ tt SEP 1 5 1998 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE September 15, 1998 FOR BOARD ACTION: Satisfaction of Lien: NEED MOTION authorizing the Chairman to sign Satisfaction of Lien for Sen'ices of the Public Defender for Case Nos.: 9701765MMA, 9705159MMA, 9701270CFA, 9706507MMA, 9702947MMA, 9702310MMA, 9803695MMA, 9802016MMA, 9709789MMA, 9800482MMA, 9801224MMA, 9802628MMA, 9705072MMA, 970573MMA, 9705832MMA, 9706020MMA, 9709401MMA, 9710171MMA, 9709669MMA, 9805327MMA, MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS DIRECTED: Clerk of Courts: Submitted for public record, pursuant to Florida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(1), the disbursements for the Board of County Commissioners for the period: A. August 24, 1998 through August 28, 1998 District.__ls: Do North Naples Fire Control and Rescue: General Purpose Financial Statements, September 30, 1997; Audit report for General Purpose Financial Statements, September 30, 1997; Management Letter for September 30, 1997; and Facilities Report. Port of Islands Community Development: Minutes of Meeting held June 18, 1998. Fo North Heritage Community Development: Minutes of Meeting held May 27, 1998. Heritage Greens Community Development: Minutes of Meeting held May 27, 1998 Fiddler's Creek Community Development: Minutes of Meeting held May 27, 1998. Golden Gate Fire Control & Rescue: Agenda for August 12, 1998 Collier Soil and Water Conservation: Agenda Board of Supervi: 1998, April 15, 1998, June 17, 1998, and July 15, 1998 SEP 1 5 1998 South Florida Water Management: Fiscal Year 1998-00 Proposed Budget Medical Examiners Commission 1997 Annual Report 5. Minutes: A. Collier County Historical 8,: Archaeological Preservation Board/Minutes for August 28, 1998 B. Golden Gate Beautification Advisory Committee/Minutes for August 11, 1998; Agenda/August 11, 1998 C. Code Enforcement Board - South - Transcript of Meeting for July 10, 1998 D. Enterprise Zone Development Agency Board/Minutes for May 14, 1998 E. Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee/Minutes for July 10, 1998 F. MPO Pathway Advisory Committee -Bicycle and Pedestrian Program/Agenda for August 21, 1998 G. Parks and Recreation Advisory Board/Agenda for August 19, 1998; Minutes for O June 24, 1998 H. City of Naples Natural Resources Management/Agenda for August 6, 1998 I. The Lake Trafford Restoration Task Force/Agenda for April 17, 1998 J. Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority/Minutes for July 27, 1998 K. Collier County Environmental Advisor3' Board/Agenda for September 2, 1998 L. Emergency Medical Service Advisory Council (EMSAC)/Informal Minutes for July 29, 1998 M. Collier County Planning Commission/Agenda for August 20, 199828, 1998 N. Florida Transportation Commission/Agenda for September 10, 1998 O. Collier County Department of Housing and Urban Development/Upcoming Board Meetings: November 12, 1998, February 11, 1999, May 13, 1999, and August 13, 1999 P. Florida/vtetropolitan Planning Organization Advisor3' Council/Meeting October 22, 1998 NO. //~' ~'~ SEP 1 5 1998 Pg. ~, o Other,: A. Tax Collector's recapitulation of the 1997 Tax Roll for Collier County, Florida (D.O.R. form 502 and 503). A'-G E N D',~--Z SEP 15 1998 Pg o EXECL,,rTZVE SUMMARY RECG~AMEND THAT THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ENDORSE THE CLERK OF THE C~RCUT~ COURT'S OFFICE ~ANT APPLiCATiON FOR THE STATE OF FLO~DA D~U~ CON~OL AND SYS~M ~ROVEME~ FO~ULA PRO.AM, EDWARD BYRNE MEMORIAL STA~ AND LOCAL ASSISTANCE P~O~A~, ~VE PERCENT $~ ASSIbE FUNDS. OB3ECT[VE: To obtain the Collier County Board of County Commissioner endorsement of the Clerk of the Circuit Court's Office grant application for funding from the Florida Department of Community Affairs' Drug Control and System ]:mprovement Formula Grant Program, Edward Byrne Memorial State and Local Assistance Program. The grant is for the development of a criminal information system along with the related hardware. CONSi[DERA'I-Z. ON: The specific problem to be addressed through the use of these grant funds relates to the capture, storage, and utilization of criminal court case records contained in the Offender Based Transaction System (OBTS). The Criminal ]~nformation System (CZ$) in use by Collier County Clerk of Courts currently lacks the ability to capture and transmit juvenile or domestic violence case data on a daily basis. The changes in Federal law, specifically the Brady Crime Control Act, the National Child Protection Act, and the Violent Crime Control Act, coupled with reporting requirements of the Florida Department of Law Enforcement (FDLE), the Office of the State Court Administrator (O5¢A), and the needs of other Collier County criminal justice users has brought the Clerk's ¢TZ5 to o crisis point in which expansion and modifications are required. Due to the fact that the current CI5 was placed into usage in 19B§, these upgrades and enhancements allowing for the capture and transmission of juvenile and domestic violence case history data are required. Without these changes the system will not be able to meet the projected goals for frequency of reporting (daily), expansion of data interfaces (juvenile and domestic violence case histories), and the provision of reports to the numerous local, state, end federal criminal justice agencies, users, and the courts. This is the initial segment of o multi-segmented, multi-year process making programming modifications required in order to begin the migration to a relational data base platform which ultimately will become the primary data collection module for a fully integrated Collier County Criminal 3'ustice Information ,Systems Network (¢,TZS). The deadline for this grant application was August 3X, 2998. In an effort to secure the grant funds, the application wu presented to the County Administrator for endorsement due to the Board being in recess until September 1, 1998. The action requested today is the Board's endorsement. F~CAL I/~PACT: The total funding being requested is $333,095. or $249,871.75 is being sought by the grant with a local match of t' ,nty five ~.rc~t SEP -¸0 $83,273.2§. The local matching funds will be provided via the Public Records Modernization Trust Fund, which is the responsibility of the Clerk of the Circuit Court. There is no fiscal impact to any funds of the Board of Co~t¥ Commissioners. ~::tOWTH T,A/~PA~'..: None RI~COMMI~NDAT[ON: That the Board of County Commissioners endorse the aforementioned grant application. ~mesL. Mitc'hell, C~A, CFE, CBA Director of Fir~nce and Accounting Date: 3. Walter Cross Executive Assistant Clerk at' the Circuit Court Date: SEP i 5 Drug Control and System Zmprovem£nt Formula Grant ProD'am 5igr~ture Page (Edward Elyrn~ Memorial State and Local Assistance Prag~m) :n witness whereof, the p~rti~s affirm they each have read and agree to conditions set forth in this agreement, have read and understand the agreement in i+s entirety and have executed this agreement by their duly authorized officers on the date, month and year set out below. Corrections including strik~overs, whiteouts, etc.. on this page (u'e not acceptable. .State of Fbrida Departmont of Community Affairs Bur~u of Community Assistance By: Type h22me and Title: I By: Type N~me and Title: 5ubgrant I~ecipient Authorizing Official of Governmental Unit (Commission Chairman. Mayor, or bLsignated Representative} Barbara B~.Ber-m/. Chairman. Collier C~unt~ I~grd of CounlW Commissioners Date: .September 1§. :1998 FE'ID Number: 56-6CXX~§8 Implementing Agency Official, Administrator or besigr~ted Type I~me and Title: Dwight E. Brock, Clerk of thc Circuit Court ~ollicr County, Florida Date: 1999 ~ ~l~l,c~,~ Poc~ ~pp~ P~ 20ef 34