Agenda 01/10/2017 Item # 9C 9.D
01/10/2017
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing
be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an
Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development
Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of
Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the
zoning classification of the herein described real property from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning
district to an Industrial Planned Unit Development (IPUD) zoning district to allow solid waste and
resource recovery facilities and public vehicle and equipment storage and repair facilities for a
project to be known as Collier County Resource Recovery Business Park IPUD on property located
1.5 miles east of Collier Boulevard and one mile north of White Lake Boulevard in Section 25,
Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida consisting of 344± acres; providing for
repeal of Resolution No. 09-275; and by providing an effective date. [PUDZ-PL20150002737]
OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff's findings and
recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC)
regarding the above referenced petition, render a decision regarding this rezoning petition, and ensure
the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the
community's interests are maintained.
CONSIDERATIONS: The subject property is located within the North Belle Meade Overlay (NBMO)
and the Rural Mixed-Use Overlay, Sending Lands (RMUO-Sending Lands), approximately one and one-
half(1.5) miles east of Collier Boulevard and one (1) mile north of White Lake Boulevard in Section 25,
�—� Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The petitioner is requesting that the Board
consider an application to rezone the property from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to an
Industrial Planned Unit Development (IPUD) zoning district to allow solid waste and resource recovery
facilities and public vehicle and equipment storage/repair facilities for a project on 344±acres.
FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help
offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund
projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as
needed to maintain an adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet
the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved
by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with
the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees
collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional
revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the
value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the
criteria used by staff and the CCPC to analyze this petition.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) IMPACT: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The
subject property is located within the Agricultural/Rural designated area, Rural Fringe Mixed Use District
(RFMUD), Sending Lands, as identified on the Countywide Future Land Use Map (FLUM) of the
Growth Management Plan (GMP). The RFMUD generally provides a transition between the Urban and
Estates designated lands and between the Urban and Agricultural/Rural and Conservation designated
lands farther to the east. The RFMUD employs a balanced approach to protect natural resources and
private property rights and provides for large areas of open space. The RFMUD allows for a mixture of
urban and rural levels of service.
Packet Pg.148
9D�.
01/10/2017
The Sending Lands have been identified as being least appropriate for development within the RFMUD.
Based on the evaluation of available data, these lands have a greater degree of environmental or listed
species habitat value than Receiving Lands or Neutral Lands and generally have avoided being disturbed
through previous development or agricultural operations.
The Sending Lands designation allows participation in the Transfer of Development Rights (TDR)
program, including Rural Villages and residential clustering, single-family residences at a density of one
(1) dwelling unit per five (5) acres or legally nonconforming parcel, agricultural uses, and other non-
residential uses including facilities for the collection, transfer, processing, and reduction of solid waste.
The RFMUD allows for resource recovery activities within Sending Lands, stating,
Public facilities, including solid waste and resource recovery facilities, and public vehicle and
equipment storage and repair facilities, shall be permitted within Section 25, Township 49S,
Range 26E, on lands adjacent to the existing County landfill. This shall not be interpreted to
allow.for the expansion of the landfill into Section 25 for the purpose of solid waste disposal.
The existing Collier County Resource Recovery Business Park was approved as a conditional use on June
23, 2009, by Resolution No. 09-275, allowing for yard waste and storm debris processing [seventy-two
(72) acres], construction and debris processing [fourteen (14) acres], a recycled material processing
facility [fourteen (14) acres], a household hazardous waste facility [five (5) acres], an administration and
equipment maintenance facility [nine (9) acres], tire processing [three (3) acres], and white goods (old
appliances) processing [three (3) acres]. This petition would provide for the same type uses within PUD
zoning. Applicable Future Land Use Element (FLUE) policies were evaluated by staff as part of the
original (2009) conditional use request. The proposed changes do not necessitate new re-evaluation of
applicable FLUE policies under Objective 7.
FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new developments to be compatible with the surrounding land area.
Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to the Zoning Services staff as part of their review of
the petition in its entirety.
Based upon the above analysis,the proposed rezoning petition may be deemed consistent with the FLUE.
Transportation Element: In evaluating this project, staff reviewed the applicant's Traffic Impact
Statement(TIS)for consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP using the 2014
and 2015 Annual Update and Inventory Reports (AUIR).
Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP states,
The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications,
conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE)
affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with
consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve
any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in
the current AUIR or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in
the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway
segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of
Service Standard within the ,five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating
stipulations are also approved. A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic
impact statement reveals that any of the following occur:
a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is
Packet Pg. 149
9.0
01/10/2017
6. Objection Letter Lot 2 Boissonneault (PDF)
7. Objection Letter Lot 3 Case (PDF)
8. Objection Letter Lot 4 Leonard (PDF)
9. Objection Letter Lot 5 Kulbacki(PDF)
10. Objection Letter-Email Rechter (PDF)
11. Legal ad-Agenda ID 2200 (PDF)
Packet Pg. 119
9.0
01/10/2017
COLLIER COUNTY
Board of County Commissioners
Item Number: 9.0
Item Summary: ***This item continued from the December 13, 2016 BCC Meeting.*** This
item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on
this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve Petition VAC-
PL20160001406 to disclaim, renounce and vacate a portion of Tract C5 Conservation Area, and a portion
of the 10 foot Collier County Conservation Buffer Easement within Tract C5, as shown on Naples
Heritage Golf and Country Club Phase One, Plat Book 26, page 73 of the Public Records of Collier
County,Florida. The subject property is located approximately 1/2 mile east of Santa Barbara Blvd, and 1
mile south of Davis Blvd, in Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. (This
is a companion to Agenda Items 9.A and 9.B).
Meeting Date: 01/10/2017
Prepared by:
Title: Operations Analyst, Senior—Administrative Services Department
Name: Bendisa Marku
12/13/2016 1:55 PM
Submitted by:
Title: Project Manager,Principal—Growth Management Department
Name: Matthew McLean
12/13/2016 1:55 PM
Approved By:
Review:
Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Division Reviewer Completed 12/13/2016 2:10 PM
Growth Management Development Review John Houldsworth Additional Reviewer Completed
Growth Management Department Matthew McLean Additional Reviewer Completed 12/14/2016 2:36 PM
Growth Management Department James French Additional Reviewer Completed 12/14/2016 6:59 PM
County Attorney's Office Scott Stone Level 2 Attorney Review Completed 12/15/2016 9:30 AM
Growth Management Department David Wilkison Level 2 Division Administrator Completed 12/15/2016 11:31 AM
Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 12/15/2016 2:48 PM
County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A.Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorneys Office Review Completed 12/15/2016 4:41 PM
Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Completed 12/20/2016 3:15 PM
County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 12/27/2016 3:56 PM
Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 01/10/2017 9:00 AM
Packet Pg. 120
((Z)50 al e8e;iaaH saideN-OVA : 8L17Z) 00 a6e1uaH saideN ONO :;uewyoellV
NAPLES HERITAGE .c)
GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB O.
a
ca
al
August 15, 2015
To Whom It May Concern:
The Naples Heritage Golf&Country Club, Inc. submits this letter as acknowledgement that we are the
applicant for the Vacation of Right-of-way for Tract RW4 of Naples Heritage Golf&Country Club, Phase
One and have no objection to the vacation of this right-of-way.
Sincerely,
f.;. ') 1:1)
J! fJ
67
David Beiser, President
Naples Heritage Golf&Country Club, Inc.
8150 Heritage Club Way•Naples.'Florida 34112
239-4I7-2555 • Fax 239-417-1717
9.C.2
RESOLUTION NO. 2017-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO
DISCLAIM, RENOUNCE AND VACATE A PORTION OF TRACT
C5 CONSERVATION AREA, AND A PORTION OF THE 10 FOOT
COLLIER COUNTY CONSERVATION BUFFER EASEMENT
WITHIN TRACT C5, AS SHOWN ON NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF
AND COUNTRY CLUB PHASE ONE, PLAT BOOK 26, PAGE 73
OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA.
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1/2
MILE EAST OF SANTA BARBARA BLVD, AND 1 MILE SOUTH
OF DAVIS BLVD, IN SECTION 9,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE
26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PETITION VAC-
PL20160001406)
w
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution 2013-166, Gina R. Green, P.E., of Gina R.
Green, P.A., on behalf of Petitioner. Naples Heritage Community Development District,
has requested the vacation of a portion of Tract C5 Conservation Area, and a portion of
the 10 foot Collier County Conservation Buffer Easement within Tract C5, as shown on
Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Phase One, Plat Book 26, page 73 of the Public a;
Records of Collier County. Florida. located in Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 N
East, Collier County, Florida, being more specifically described in Exhibit A, attached
hereto: and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, on this day, held a public
hearing to consider the petitioner's request and notice of said public hearing was given as
required by law.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that a portion of Tract C5
Conservation Area. and a portion of the I0 foot Collier County Conservation Buffer
Easement within Tract CS, as shown on Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Phase
One. Plat Book 26. page 73 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, located in
Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, being more
specifically shown in Exhibit A. is hereby vacated, extinguished, renounced and
disclaimed, and this action is declared to be in the Public interest and for the Public
benefit.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED AND ORDERED that the Clerk to the Board is hereby
directed to record a certified copse of the Resolution in the Public Records of Collier
County, Florida and to make proper notation of this Resolution on the plat of Naples
Heritage Golf and Country Club Phase One, Plat Book 26, Page 73 of the Public Records
of Collier County, Florida.
tore
r \
Packet Pg. 122
9.C.2
THIS RESOLUTION ADOPTED after motion, second and majority vote favoring
same, this the day of . 2017.
ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA
N
By: 0
, Deputy Clerk DONNA FIALA, Chairman I-
rn
Approved as to form and legality:
By: (,
Scott A. Stone
o,
ti
Assistant County Attorney
Attachments:
1. Location-Site Map
2. Exhibit A
C)
w
0
N
C)
C)
E
L
C.)
r.+
_ of 2
Packet Pg. 123
McANLY ENGINEERING
L9.C.2
AND DESIGN INC.
CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING
t
EXHIBIT " A "
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
A PORTION OF THE CONSERVATION BUFFER EASEMENT
TRACT C5 AND A PORTION OF THE 10' CCCBE EASEMENT
CONTAINED WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIPTION
TO BE VACATED
LOCATED IN
NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF& COUNTRY CLUB
PHASE ONE
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA N
AUGUST 17,2016
BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK F OF NAPLES HERITAGE a)
GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB PHASE TWO A, AS RECORDED IN THE LAND RECORDS OF a
COLLIER COUNTY IN PLAT BOOK 28 PAGE 11 AND RUNNING THENCE , CROSSING THE _
EXISTING CONSERVATION BUFFER EASEMENT(TRACT C5) AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF u)
NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB PHASE ONE, AS RECORDED IN SAID LAND cz
c
RECORDS IN PLAT BOOK 26 PAGES 73 THROUGH 80 ; S89°16'53"W 24.55' TO THE OUTLINE Z
OF THE LANDS CONVEYED TO NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB IN O.R. c.)
a
BOOK 3690 PAGE 2610; THENCE BINDING THEREON N00°43'07"W 440.82' TO THE >
NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL; THENCE CROSSING THE EXISTING
CONSERVATION BUFFER EASEMENT, AFORESAID S89°35'44"E 24.89' TO THE WESTERLY N
OUTLINE OF COLONIAL COURT AS SHOWN ON THE AFORESAID PLAT OF PHASE TWO A;
THENCE BINDING THEREON BY A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT IN A
SOUTHWES l"ERLY DIRECTION OF RADIUS 530.00' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.45', SAID ARC N
BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING S00°34'24"W 24.45'; THENCE S00°44'53"E
222.24' TO THE NORTHWESTERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 AFORESAID; THENCE BINDING ON o
THE WESTERLY OUTLINE OF LOT 1, S00°44'53"E 193.65' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
0
N
CONTAINING 10771 SQ.FT OR 0.247 ACRES MORE OR LESS a'
d
PREPARED BY: c
asa
tt it +
WILLIAM C. McANLY P.S.M.
FLORIDA REGISTRATION NO. 1543
McANLY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, INC.
2025 J & C BLVD. SUITE 5
NAPLES FL 34109
2025 J&C BOULEVARD -SUITE 5
NAPLES, FLORIDA 34109-6204
PHONE (239)593-3299 FAX (239) 593-3298 (f. '-
Packet Pg. 124
9.C.2
\ EXHIBIT "A"
SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
LOT 39 NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF &
BLOCK B COUNTRY CLUB PHASE TWO-A
TRACT C5 PB 28, PG 11
CONSERVATION AND BUFFER EASEMENT LOT 6
BLOCK F
S89'35'44"E 24.89'
R=530.00 A=24.45
N8935'44"W 326.70' / CH=S00'34'24"W 24.45'
o LOT 5
BLOCK F
10771 S4. FT. OR o
0.247 ACRES +/-7---"N‘,,,7` 0
//
n LOT U
U O BLOCK F
/m �p 0)
/
z
� ^
ha C' N
NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF o ✓ 4= 0 N
i : cc
& /
COUNTRY CLUB, INC.
LA.,
C BL0CK3F
PARCEL No. 00407440001 a
o U
.A 2 >
O
o r �
o N o r
4; 4> LOT 2
L''. , 01 BLOCK F �
0 ` r
J W ' iii* m LOT 1 10' CCCBE AS SHOWN
rn (0 BLOCK F :`f'ON PLAT OF NAPLES
01
rn w HERITAGE GOLF &
0 U COUNTRY CLUE', PHASE '
4t. ONE PB 25, PG 80 0
T
P.O.B.
- -- - NAPLES HERITAGE GOI.7 S.:
N
589=16'53"W 24.55' COUNTRY CLUB PHASE ONE c)
PB 26, PG 73
Z y
0 DI
DI
(1
(11 4: TRACT C5 E
U'("t CONSERVATION AND BUFFER EASEMENT V
5-5,i) ca
Q
z
0
t f r o Cr)* TRACT RW4
SIGNED: `j `� o 0 100' FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION
William C1. cAnly, F.S.K. #1543 ;
LEGAL DESCRIPTION:
SEE LEGAL OESCPIPn0N ON SI-EET 1 OF 2
SKETCH Of LEGAL DESCRiP2iON 4cANL Y ENGINEERING
VACATION OF EA BE }alIT AND DESIGN INC. ki, aim
ENGINEERING, PLANNING, IIII ,
NAPLES HERITAGE i3OLF & COUNTRY CLUB AND LAND SURVEYING Iiihk 11.1
PHASE TWO-A 2025 JPC BOULEVARD- SUITE 5 in.ADDED CCCBE TO VACATION AREA 0I3/12/16
_ - NAPLES, FLORIDA 34109
SCALE: l'..MO OWN.:R.H. JE!X.:1d.K.R DATE: 1/15/16 (239) 593-3299 FAX(239) 593-3298 N0. REVISIONS
COPYRIGHT, 2016 BY McANLY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PROJECT: 130209 Packet Pg. 125
9.C.2
V
(--
O lora! \
- -----\,..._. ! i,,,,,
O
U
g
U QN I
U
aL
o ' H
.tar,,, u a)
rri loyal `
Qas
® Lat� W W�� . -°.10�98 o
CD
n Q
o ,1.-,, ii \\I w�// Q :I. z
't SD 1DVa1 ` LL > ss
V
.—I �.D-Oral < O�^ "-‘,"d-i. Q
o v °z W >
0 .-]H oa ••
vc. - co
CO 3'R'OS O110N L Q a O 0
c:,>,:c 35. °
'.O �v�v.� 6C\2 a uiz
r
i • \ likiL.O y .... % CD
>m- o
MI
� I 96 2:1•0 (� Q assay ' `� gR § e I c.e_5='' ,
W p❑ W j W . tssao ��.uwC7cv -� c
F �yWW� igC J 0
nl'I7il u i /l��/ U ZUy' S w 'gpp a _
0.V II'
NOOa® wU 1'!_1' CL O NTUp n . Rw : N
(�S� 1111 1. (' oW c'�.<{ Z „O 'O'i a
Ct
OZ 2 gj
(14
ot s 'I J y
gooi 6
• 1 \ IMI
• z
' 'I: §I-.': '
'41 c,"E0 < d
�, < +a�`! r _ - 'IT O WJ d
i
.. X BYS k' a rn o a
-. ��
I w • ur 1i 'our r. , iW 5Ea 4 iiir- :i W N� a
o _' ll 7 i `
.. * VaVa.
L..._„AI rarv�vircs �'''' CI i -() OW 5 MI
in
•
•} g P, ga.. ',; �r4t^y- i l,.I /
W-. lam' - - _ -
Packet Pg. 126
((Z)50 al a6e1uaH saldeN-DVA : 8LvZ) ONOT-aaunno 000 a6e;laaH saldeN :;uauayoepy
r
APLES HERITAGE
GOLF B COUN TRY CLUB n-
_
cB
Njii{> al
September 12,2016
To Whom It May Concern:
The Naples Heritage Community Development District submits this letter as acknowledgement that we
are the applicant for the Vacation of a portion of the Conservation Easement for Tract C5 of Naples
Heritage Golf&Country Club, Phase one and have no objection to the vacation of this Conservation
Easement.
Sincerely,
Peter J. Lombardi,Chairman
Naples Heritage Community Development District
8150 Heritage Club Way• Naples, Florida 34112
239-417-2555 •Fax 239-417-1717
((Z)g0 it e6e}I.JeH saldeN-DVA : BLPZ) ONO1-JauMo 003 e6e1!a8H saldeN :;uawgoepy c
N
M
U co
a; a
f4
MINUTES OF MEETING
NAPLES HERITAGE
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT
The regular meeting of the Board of Supervisors of the Naples Heritage
Community Development District was held on Tuesday, April 5, 2016 at 9:00 a.m. at the
Naples Heritage Golf and Country Clubhouse, 8150 Club Way,Naples,Florida.
Present and constituting a quorum were:
Peter J.Lombardi Chairman
Peter Ramundo Vice Chairman
Kenneth R. Gaynor Assistant Secretary
Gerald James Assistant Secretary
Richard Leonhard Assistant Secretary
Also present were:
Calvin Teague District Manager
Patrick Dorbad NHCA General Manager
Chad Montgomery HOA Grounds Superintendent
The following is a summaiy of the discussions and actions taken at the April 5,
2016 Board of Supervisors meeting.
FIRST ORDER OF BUSINESS Roll Call
The meeting was called to order and all Supervisors were present.
•
SECOND ORDER OF BUSINESS Public Comment on Agenda Items
There not being any, the next item followed.
THIRD ORDER OF BUSINESS Approval of the Minutes of the March
1,2016 Meeting
Mr. Lombardi stated each Board member received a copy of the minutes of the
March 1,2016 meeting and requested any corrections, additions or deletions.
There not being any,
f On MOTION by Mr. Ramundo seconded by Mr. Gaynor
!with all in favor the minutes of the March 1, 2016 meeting
[were approved.
((Z)93 Jl a6ellaaH seldeN-DVA : 8LVZ) ONOI-Jeumo op3 a6e1laaH seldeN :uewyoelly
M CI
Q
ai
a
w
April 5, 2016 Naples Heritage CDD a
FOURTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Old Business
A. Update on Lake Fountain
• Mr. Gaynor provided an update on the new fountain. White lights were installed
as opposed to color lights;which would cost an additional $5,100.
• Discussion ensued with regard to installing color lights and it was agreed to leave
the white lights as installed. Staff was authorized to pay the remaining invoice
balance of$12,078 to the contractor.
B. Lake Quality Analysis/Aerator Discussion
• Mr. Chad Montgomery reviewed the analysis received from Superior Waterway
regarding Lakes 7 and 16.
➢ Dissolved oxygen levels were all above 5.5 ppm.
➢ Organic sedimentation at the bottom of the lakes was less than 8
inches.
• Discussion ensued with regard to the analysis and the cost of aerators. It was
determined aeration on these two Iakes was not needed.
• Mr. Montgomery will see how the biological treatments he applied work before
any decision on aerators is made.
• Additional testing of Lakes was discussed.
On MOTION by Mr. Gaynor seconded by Mr. Leonhard
with all in favor to continue with analysis of Lakes 11 and
117 in an amount not to exceed$1,500 was approved.
FIFTH ORDER OF BUSINESS New Business
A. West Boundary Tree Trimming
• Mr. Gaynor addressed the Code Enforcement Notice of Violation received from
Collier County for a potential violation regarding the Ficus trees overhanging
onto lots on the Firano development which prevent sunlight from penetrating their
required plantings.
• Discussion ensued with regard to this issue and responsibility for maintaining the
area. The CDD owns the property.
((Z)50 al a6e1uaH seldeN-OVA : 8LpZ) ONO-i-JauMo 003 a6e1!.JeH saldeN :;uauagoe;;y
M
M T'
U �
ai o-
m
April 5, 2016 Naples Heritage CDD
0-
• District
District Counsel has noted that the ultimate obligation to maintain this property is
with the owner of the property.
• Three proposals to have this area cleaned were obtained. Expert Lawn Care, LLC
provided the lowest bid in the amount of$5,000.
On MOTION by Mr. James seconded by Mr. Leonhard
with all in favor the proposal from Expert Lawn Care,
LLC in an amount not to exceed$5,500 was approved.
• Mr. Gaynor will notify the County that the District is cleaning up the area.
SIXTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Manager's Report
A. Approval of Financial Statements
• The financial statements for the period ending February 29,2016 were reviewed.
➢ Fountain expense will be reclassified to Field Misc.-Contingency.
On MOTION by Mr. James seconded by Mr. Gaynor with
all in favor the February 29, 2016 financials were
accepted.
B. FY 2017 Budget Review
• No changes were made to the tentative budget.
• It was noted lake levels are still high; but Landshore should be able to return in
two weeks to work on structure F10.
• The annual Field Inspection Report will be available for the next meeting.
• Information for the general election and the tentative fiscal year 2017 budget has
been posted on the District website.
SEVENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Attorney's Report
There not being any,the next item followed.
EIGHTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Supervisor's Requests
• Supervisor James commented on the five acres the HOA was purchasing and if
the CDD would be required to include this area in their preserve obligations.
3
((Z)SO al 96e11.J9H sepdeN-3VA : BLt'Z) ONO1-JeuMo GOO 36e1!JaH se deN : uawuoe;;`d
U
ai
C1
0_
C)
m
April 5, 2016 Naples Heritage CDD
• Discussion ensued with regard to the five acre area and maintenance obligations.
• Mr. Teague commented that if it was included in the CDD's responsibilities it
would have to be included in the permit which the Board would have to accept.
In addition they would have to be given an ownership or land interest position in
this area through title or an easement. The CDD would not be forced to accept
any new responsibilities they did not want to accept. They could not be forced to
accept responsibility or spend funds on private property.
NINTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Audience Comments
There not being any,the next item followed.
TENTH ORDER OF BUSINESS Adjournment
There being no further business,
On MOTION by Mr. Gaynor seconded by Mr. James with
all in favor the meeting was adjourned.
Cal Teague ! Peter J. L mbardi
Secretary Chairman
4
9.C.4
Gina Green
rorn: Huber, Joe <huber@CCAPGH.org>
Sent: Friday, August 19, 2016 5:45 PM
To: 'Gina Green'; chusee@wpa.net
Cc: 'Patrick Dorbad'
Subject: RE: Patrick
Gina.
Thank for providing me with the information on the vacation of the conservation easement I have had a busy week and
have just had the opportunity to reviewed the material. I do have some questions for you .If you could please give me a
call Monday morning . I have some meetings beginning at 9:30 . My cell number is 412-680-0509.If we agree to the send c:,
a letter vacating the easement I propose the language listed below. I look forward to speaking with you.
Mr. & Mrs.Joseph V Huber., as owners of Lot 1, Block F, Naples Heritage Phase 2-A, the lot located to the east and d
adjacent to the Conservation Easement C5 of the Naples Heritage Golf& Country Club, has no objection to the vacation :°
of that portion of Tract C5, a Conservation Easement in Naples Heritage Golf& Country Club, Phase One that lies
adjacent to their property on the condition that Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club shall erect at a minimum an
Enhanced Type B Landscape Buffer as set forth in Exhibit "A-2" attached hereto in the above described Conservation
Easement. z
U
ti
From: Gina Green [mailto:ggreeneng@aol.com]
?nt:Wednesday, August 17, 2016 1:46 PM
to: Huber,Joe; chusee@wpa.net
Cc: 'Patrick Dorbad'
Subject: RE: Patrick
Good Afternoon Mr. & Mrs. Huber:
Please find attached 3 drawings. Two that show the aerial view of your house. One is taken from the property o
appraisers website. I have highlighted in yellow,the Conservation Easement that is presently located on the north and
(73
west sides of your property. The second is the engineering plan for the tennis facility along with the approximate
location of your house on your lot so you can see the proximity of your house to the proposed improvements. The third ..
is the Landscape buffer that is part of the PUD Amendment that is required in the 25' along the side of your property e-,
where the Conservation Easement is presently located.
U
f6
Please be aware that the Property Appraiser's aerial is slightly off with the parcel lines. This unfortunately cannot be
changed to be depicted correctly on this plan due to the rectification and alignment of their overlay on the aerials by the
County. But it does give a representation of your house and the lands around it.
The proposed tennis courts will be approximately 100' west of your house. The amenities building will be located to the
north of your house and due west of the cul-de-sac, approximately 75' from your property west property line(appr ox.
100' from the northwest corner your house). The area between your house and these proposed improvements will be
natural area maintaining the native vegetation, except for exotic tree removal (which is Brazilian pepper hedge,
melaleuca, and any other vegetation that is deemed exotic by Collier County and SFWMD). All of the pines, palms, etc.
ill remain. There will also be a 25' landscape buffer with 80% opacity required along all of Colonial Court and adjacent
o your house located in the 25' conservation easement that we are proposing to vacate. This buffer is required by
Collier County and will be installed and maintained by Naples Heritage. This requirement is an enhanced standard over
1
Packet Pg. 132
9.C.4
the County minimum for residential parcels adjacent to recreation facilities that was required during the hearings for the
PUD Amendment for the tennis site to be added to the PUD for Naples Heritage. The county minimum for recreational
structures adjacent to residential lot lines is 50'. We have placed these facilities twice this amount to accommodate the
neighboring properties.
On the engineering plan, there is a hatched area to the west of your lot, in the current Conservation easement,that
shows fill and sod that is located in the conservation easement. These improvements to the Conservation easement
area violation of code and if the County and the South Florida Water Management District chose to pursue, could
require the removal of the fill and vegetative improvements and the area restored to natural grade with native plantings
as restoration to return this area to its previous natural state. As part of the permitting with SFWMD and the vacation
of this easement, this will allow for the fill and vegetation to remain as it is and also allows for additional landscape
improvements to be placed in this area without it being a violation of code. If we do not vacate the conservation
easement, then SFWMD will require that this area be restored to its natural state which would mean that the existing
vegetation and fill would be removed and scraped down to match the natural grade of the parcel where the tennis Cs1
center is proposed. This would impact your side yard and may require some sort of slope restraint such as a retaining
wall, landscape timbers or stacked interlocking paver brick wall.
m
It is the intent of Naples Heritage to work with you on this vegetative buffer and see that you are shielded from the :°
tennis center. Please review these plans and feel free to call me with any questions you may have. My cell number is
239-229-6238. My office number is listed below.
a)
a
If this is agreeable to you, we ask that you provide a Letter of No Objection to the vacation of the easement. You can
copy and paste the language below into a letter, sign and email it back to myself or Patrick Dorbad at Naples Heritage.
>
Mr. & Mrs. Joseph Huber., as owners of Lot 1, Block F, Naples Heritage Phase 2-A, the lot located to the east and co
ti
adjacent to the Conservation Easement C5 of the Naples Heritage Golf& Country Club, has no objection to the vacation N
of that portion of Tract C5, a Conservation Easement in Naples Heritage Golf& Country Club, Phase One that lies `�
adjacent to their property. o
J
Thank you for your consideration in this matter. I look forward to speaking to you if you have any questions.
a)
Gina R. Green, P.E. .�
3310 1't Avenue NW
Naples, FL 34120
239-348-0500 ra
866-720-4823 - FAX a)
a)
m
From: Patrick Dorbad o:cmranh`cc.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 17, 2016 12:24 PM
To: Gina Green «zreener,�aaol.cam>
Cc: Huber,Joe <huber@CCAPGH.org>; chusee@woa.net
Subject: Patrick
Gina,
Can you please forward on to Mr. & Mrs. Huber what we spoke of? Here is their email.
Thank you,
Patrick J. Porbad, CAM
General Manager/COO
Naples Heritage Golf& Country Club
am(�nhacc.com
2
Packet Pg. 133
9.C.4
(239)417-2555 Office
(239) 417-1717 Fax
.r
�" ,,''''
f \ CLU® .—..
A55OCtAT1OMY
»..,a rle1 1CA FL9xz G t AUF 1 t t'f TI
Mission Statement
"Naples Heritage Golf& Country Club is a casually elegant golf club with a commitment to provide friendly and sincere personal
service driven by a well trained and quality oriented staff with hands on management working as a team to meet and exceed our
members and guests expectations"
N_
L[)
0
F-
I-
a)
0)
Ca
.`
W
I
N
N
O_
f6
Z
(..i
Q
co
ti
TrN
r
O
J
C,
.0n
I
a)
O
7
E
O
w
CC
E
C)
C
d
E
U
cisQ
3
Packet Pg. 134
9.C.5
Marcus L. Berman, P.S. M.
County Land Surveyor
Development Review Division
Growth Management Department
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples Florida 34104 September 20.2016
RE: Naples Heritage Golf&Country Club
N
Vacation of Easement
Petition VAC-PL20160001406
d
Dear Mr. Berman ,
We are the owners of Lot 1 in the Naples Heritage Golf& Country Club plan of lots show as
Folio 61870001621 on the site plan for vacation submitted by Gina R. Green, P.A. Per my conversation =
with Scoot Stone and Eric Johnson objecting to this vacation,this letter is to express our written
objection t to the vacation of this easement. In support of this we cite the following reasons:
1. Vacation of this easement would eliminate the quiet and peaceful enjoyment by us and
other residents of Colonial Court a totally single family residential neighbor. o•
2. We paid a premium for this property location because of the charartistics of the neigh hood
and the unique nature of this area in Naples Heritage. The easement enhanced these
characteristics of Colonial Court.
3. The single family homes on Colonial Court are the only single family homes not on Naples
Heritage Drive the main thoroughfare in the Naples Heritage Community which makes the
street unique.
J
4. Development of the adjacent parcel will substantially increase traffic on Colonial Court and
the intersection at Naples Heritage drive.The addition of an entrance to this development
close to this intersection will create a hazardous and unsafe condition. I J
5. Colonia Court cul de sac is used by all residents of Naples Heritage for walking jogging and
bicycle riding both by adults and children. The resultant increased traffic and intersection m
will result in a safety hazard for these individuals. J�
O
6. The easement provides a buffer for our property from any development including the
proposed in this plan.The proposed landscape buffer is insufficient to prevent the
disruption and attendant noise and activity associated with a recreational area
7. At the time of our purchase of our lot,the property sought to be developed for the tennis
courts was not owned by the PUD. It was purchased to prevent further development with
the objective of preventing additional traffic in this neighborhood and the community.
Development of this site is inconsistent with this objective, and imposes a development
never contemplated by the original developers or the purchasers of Colonial Court.
8. All of land to the south east and west is currently either wooded, conservation or preserve.
Except for the six single family homes. Vacation this easement and the subsequent
development of a recreational area on the adjacent property will have a negative
environmental impact on birds and wildlife as well the residents of Colonial Court.
9. Vacation of this property and adding fill, and changing the contours of the land could
negatively impact the water flow drainage and potential for standing water in the area
Packet Pg. 135
9.C.5
thereby impacting adjacent property owners.
10. There are no other recreational areas in the single family residential portion of Naples
Heritage PUD:yet this plan seeks to prose one on these residents.
11. Vacation of this easement will negatively impact the property values of residents of Colonial
Court.
The letter submitted with this with this vacation request states and I quote "there is an indirect public
benefit of vacating this conservation easement".We see no public benefit and a lot of adverse impact
on us,the residents of Colonial Court and adjacent property owners.
The Naples Heritage PUD has available property that could be utilized to develop this tennis facility near
the existing clubhouse, golf club, swing pool and restaurant. Adding this existing tract rather than �n
developing it would add to the preserve and conservation area in the PUD. v
I-
a�
In our view and many others there has not been a good faith attempt to pursue another location for theca
tennis courts. If this were a new development, no developer would propose to put a recreation facility `,
such as proposed here in the midst of a single family residential area nor would a municipality in my
view approve such a plan without serious review and questioning. In the instant case,they seek to a)
impose such a Plan on residents some of whom have resided in the community for decades, and have
done so with misrepresentations and half-truths. Q
We ask that you reject the application for Vacation of this conservation Easement. co
ti
Respectfully Submitted, `V
L
a�
�.d
°
J
Joseph h V. Huber
Barbara M. Huber
3645 SR 982
Latrobe, Pa 15650
U
a)
0
a,
U
ca
Packet Pg. 136
9.C.6
Marcus L Berman,P.S.M
County Land Surveyor
Development Review Division
Growth Management Department
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples Florida 34104
Re: Naples Heritage Golf& Country Club
Vacation of Easement
Petition VAC-PL20160001406
U
Dear Mr. Berman ~
d
I am the owner of Lot#2 in the Naples Heritage Golf& Country Club at 7689 cts
Colonial Court, Naples Florida 34112, please consider this communication as my Lai
written objection to the vacation of this easement.
It is my understanding you have been in receipt of a similar written objection from
several other property owners on Colonial Court, most notable from Mr. Joeseph
Huber which definitively identifies and captures many valid reasons for your office >
to reject the application for Vacation of this conservation Easement. ro
N
Without rehashing that communication, I would add the following emphasis to some
of his points of contention. to
1. The proposed vacation of this easement and subsequent proposed
alterations to the Naples Heritage PUD are substantially different than what
was represented to the residents of Colonial Court as recent as six months co
ago. This is very concerning.
2. When I purchased this residential property in 2014, It was largely because of
CL-)
the characteristics of the property, including the minimal amount of traffic,
and environmental make up of the neighborhood.
3. There is no doubt that this will negatively impact the values of the properties
in this neighborhood,.
4. I am particularly concerned about the impact on drainage and water p
collection on lots that are adjacent or nearly adjacent to the proposed
recreational area as a result of changes to the landscaping and contour of
said area.
Please consider the above as your office carefully considers the vacation of this
conservation Easement. I respectfully ask that you consider the negative impact on
the environment as well as the unfavorable effects on the residents of the Colonial
Court Neighborhood.
Thank you in advance for your careful consideration of this matter.
Packet Pg. 137
9.C.6
Respectfully Submitted.
Bart Boissonneault
Herminia Muche
7689 Colonial Court
Naples Florida 34112
a)
CC
z
C)
a
CC
U
>
co
ti
N
et
0
0
U)
N_
O
ca
N
O
J
d
C)
-J
0
U
C)
0
C
C)
7)
CS
Y
Packet Pg. 138
9.C.7
September 29, 2016
Marcus L. Berman, P.S.M.
County Land Surveyor
Development Review Division
Growth Management Department
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104
N_
U)
0
RE: Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club
Vacation of Easement
Petition VAC-PL20160001406 »�
a)
x
Dear Mr, Berman,
co
We are the owners of Lot#3 (7685 Colonial Ct) and have resided here for 16 years. Our lot is a
Folio 61870001663 on the site plan.This letter is to state our objection to the vacation of the
above easement.
co
We are in complete agreement with letters submitted by our neighbors Joseph and Barbara
Huber, Walter and Catherine Kulbacki, Bart Boissonneault and Herminia Muche. They have
detailed all of our concerns. o
We see absolutely no reason for this beautiful conservation area to be disturbed.There are
many other options that have not been thoroughly investigated. Locating the tennis courts
closer to the other amenities makes more sense. J
We ask that you reject the application for the vacation of this conservation easement.Your °
thoughtful consideration will be deeply appreciated.
0
Respectfully Submitted,
Leon and Barbara Case
7685 Colonial Court
Naples, FL 34112
Packet Pg. 139
9.C.8
Dear Mr. Berman, October 6, 2016
We are the owners of Lot 4, 7681 Colonial Ct. in Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club,
Folio#6187001689.
We are very concerned about the expansion plan in our neighborhood of the proposed
tennis court complex.
Mr. Huber has expressed our concerns regarding the expansion in his letter to you dated
September 20, 2016. He expresses our feelings, as well as all residents who live on
Colonial Ct.
This is a secluded street in NHGCC.We all bought on Colonial Ct. for the peace and quiet it provides us.
Also it is a safe haven for my young grandchildren to ride their bikes and play their games.
The addition of the tennis complex, along with the increased traffic greatly affects the above. ca
I hope you take this and all the reasons that Mr. Huber expressed in his letter to you and reject the
application for vacation of the conservation easement.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter.
Sincerely, °'
F.-
Thomas Leonard -a
Lois Leonard
m
J
Marcus L. Berman, P.S. M. o
County Land Surveyor .3
Development Review Division a)
Growth Management Department
J
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive
Naples Florida 34104 September 20.2016 d
RE: Naples Heritage Golf&Country Club
Vacation of Easement
Petition VAC-PL20160001406
tQ
Dear Mr. Berman,
We are the owners of Lot 1 in the Naples Heritage Golf&Country Club plan of lots show as
Folio 61870001621 on the site plan for vacation submitted by Gina R.Green, P.A. Per my conversation
with Scoot Stone and Eric Johnson objecting to this vacation,this letter is to express our written
objection t to the vacation of this easement. In support of this we cite the following reasons:
1. Vacation of this easement would eliminate the quiet and peaceful enjoyment by us and
other residents of Colonial Court a totally single family residential neighbor.
Packet Pg. 140
9.C.8
2. We paid a premium for this property location because of the charartistics of the neigh hood
and the unique nature of this area in Naples Heritage.The easement enhanced these
characteristics of Colonial Court.
3. The single family homes on Colonial Court are the only single family homes not on Naples
Heritage Drive the main thoroughfare in the Naples Heritage Community which makes the
street unique.
4. Development of the adjacent parcel will substantially increase traffic on Colonial Court and
the intersection at Naples Heritage drive.The addition of an entrance to this development
close to this intersection will create a hazardous and unsafe condition. I
5. Colonia Court cul de sac is used by all residents of Naples Heritage for walking jogging and
bicycle riding both by adults and children.The resultant increased traffic and intersection �,
will result in a safety hazard for these individuals. v
6. The easement provides a buffer for our property from any development including the
proposed in this plan.The proposed landscape buffer is insufficient to prevent the
disruption and attendant noise and activity associated with a recreational area
7. At the time of our purchase of our lot,the property sought to be developed for the tennis
courts was not owned by the PUD. It was purchased to prevent further development with
the objective of preventing additional traffic in this neighborhood and the community.
Development of this site is inconsistent with this objective,and imposes a development
never contemplated by the original developers or the purchasers of Colonial Court. Q
8. All of land to the south east and west is currently either wooded, conservation or preserve.
Except for the six single family homes.Vacation this easement and the subsequent
development of a recreational area on the adjacent property will have a negative
environmental impact on birds and wildlife as well the residents of Colonial Court.
9. Vacation of this property and adding fill, and changing the contours of the land could
negatively impact the water flow drainage and potential for standing water in the area o
thereby impacting adjacent property owners.
10. There are no other recreational areas in the single family residential portion of Naples
Heritage PUD:yet this plan seeks to prose one on these residents. J
11. Vacation of this easement will negatively impact the property values of residents of Colonial
Court.
0
The letter submitted with this with this vacation request states and I quote "there is an indirect public
benefit of vacating this conservation easement". We see no public benefit and a lot of adverse impact
on us,the residents of Colonial Court and adjacent property owners. 0
0
The Naples Heritage PUD has available property that could be utilized to develop this tennis facility near
the existing clubhouse,golf club,swing pool and restaurant. Adding this existing tract rather than
rts
developing it would add to the preserve and conservation area in the PUD.
In our view and many others there has not been a good faith attempt to pursue another location for the
tennis courts. If this were a new development, no developer would propose to put a recreation facility
such as proposed here in the midst of a single family residential area nor would a municipality in my
view approve such a plan without serious review and questioning. in the instant case,they seek to
impose such a Plan on residents some of whom have resided in the community for decades, and have
done so with misrepresentations and half-truths.
We ask that you reject the application for Vacation of this conservation Easement.
Packet Pg. 141
9.C.8
Respectfully Submitted,
Joseph h V. Huber
Barbara M. Huber
3645 SR 982
Latrobe, Pa 15650
N_
U
I-
a)
a)
ca
Lai
(I)
d
).
ca
U
a7
ti
C6
0
a)
J
1
O
J
I-
a)
w
a)
J
O
U
m
0
.ij
a)
U
fa
Packet Pg. 142
9.C.9
WALTER S. KULBACKI • 7677 Colonial Court. Naples Florida, 34112
703-894-8934
September 25, 2016
Marcus L. Berman, P.S. M.
County Land Surveyor
Development Review Division
Growth Management Department
2800 N. Horseshoe Drive N
Naples Florida 34104 ,t",
RE: Naples Heritage Golf& Country Club
Vacation of Easement
Petition VAC-PL20160001406
Dear Mr. Berman;
ns
My wife and I are full time residents and live at 7677 Colonial Court, Naples FL 34112 in the
Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Community. We are the owners of Lot 5 shown as Folio
61870001702 as shown on the site plan for vacation submitted by Gina Green, P.A. In addition I .•
have been discussing this proposed relocation of a recreation area...specifically 6 tennis courts co
and associated additional infrastructure elements with Bob Mulhere( Planning Engineer Hole N
Montes), Eric Johnson(Collier County Planning Engineer), and Pat Dorbad, the GM of NHGCC.
This letter expresses my strong objection to the vacation easement as outlined with the .c
significant reasons below:
U,
• Safety and Traffic Flow— Putting the 6 courts in this residential area would greatly and
dramatically increase traffic and create a safety hazard for not only the residents of J
Colonial Court ..but a safety issue for all those that use this quiet residential area for
waiking and jogging.
The road network on Colonial Court was not designed for this level �
of traffic ...as well as the feeder roads to Colonial Court. This is why the courts are o
currently located in a central location with the appropriate road network ...as all Country m
Clubs in Naples have done.
• The Residential Environmnet -Vacation of this easement would completely change
the peaceful environment of a completely single family home environment....as well as aa)
destroying an essential preserve and conservation area that needs to be maintained in
our residential community. Owners paid a premium for the Colonial Court location and
were told the land across from their homes would remain a preserve and conservation
area.
• Buffer for Colonial Court Residents -The easement provides a buffer for our property
from any development including the proposed relocation of courts in this plan. The
proposed landscape buffer is insufficient to prevent the disruption and attendant noise
and activity associated with a tennis recreational area.
• Bird and Wildlife Impact-All of land to the south east and west is currently either
wooded, conservation or preserve, except for the six single family homes. Vacation of
this easement and the subsequent development of a recreational area on the adjacent
Packet Pg. 143
9.C.9
property will have a negative environmental impact on birds and wildlife as well the
residents of Colonial Court.
• Topographcal Concerns to Include Water Flow—Because of the low level and
topographical contour of the land, water flow, containment and contour of the land will
require significant fill ..which when completed would not satisfy the efficient flow of water
out of the area...and would cause a good deal of standing water which would not be
good for health reasons. The SW Florida Water Authority is currently evaluating this for
approval and more than likely will not be able and should not approve the plan for this
area. . The Collier County planning Board also has raised concerns of water flow and
associated issues for this plan.
• Purchase of Land—The purchase of this land was to prevent any further development
in this area and to maintain the preserve and conservation areas not only for the Colonial
Court resident..but for all the residents of NHGCC who use the Colonial Court as a
walking and jogging area. a�
• No Good Faith Effort for Central Location—The 6 Tennis courts were initially planned ;4
in a central location near in the area of the golf driving range. For some reason there i
was no application developed and sent to the Corps of Engineers (COE)for this site.
Approval could have been attained since once the 5 acres near Colonial Ct were traded
for the proposed driving range location it would be a"zero plus" swap for preserve area. z
The Project Manager COE responsible for this effort was not sure why this was not done.
• Buffers—Adequate buffering for the residents on Colonial Ct, as well as all residents
bordering this proposed recreation area cannot be done if this easement is vacated. This m
again was a concern for the County Planning Board..in particular its Chairmen as noted N
in the planning board minutes.
f4
• Summary and Conclusion—There is no public benefit as highlighted in the letter
requesting vacation. As outlined above, it is a public negative to not only the Colonial
Court residents, but all NGCC residents(almost 50%voted against this plan). As `r'
highlighted above, safety, the preserve, and conservation environment are critical factors, .3
along with the imminent water issues idenitified for vacating the easement. The Naples ,
Heritage PUD has available property that could be utilized to develop this tennis facility rD
near the existing clubhouse, golf club, swimming pool and restaurant. Adding this existing
tract rather than developing it would add to the preserve and conservation area in the
PUD. In our view and many other residents, there has not been a good faith attempt to m
pursue another location for the tennis courts. If this were a new development, no p
developer would propose to put a recreation facility such as proposed here in the midst of
c
a single family residential area nor would a municipality in my view approve such a plan.
In this instance, NHGCC seek to impose such a plan on residents some of whom have
resided in the community for decades, and have done so with misrepresentations and ;a
half-truths.
We respectfully and strongly request that you reject the application for Vacation of this
conservation Easement. Should you need any additional information or clarification please do not
hesitate,4)call me.
F
•
Walter and Catherine Kulbacki
Packet Pg. 144
9.C.10
BermanMarcus
From: Stephen Rechter <srechter@outlook.com>
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2016 4:54 PM
To: HenningTom; BermanMarcus
Cc: Walt; huber@ccapgh.org
Subject: Tennis Courts on Colonial Court at Naples Heritage - Request for reconsideration
Dear Misters Henning and Berman,
My wife, Pamela, and I are residents of 7680 Naples Heritage Drive. Our property is not immediately adjacent to the
proposed tennis courts as are those on Colonial Court. However, our property will be affected by the construction of the c:,
tennis courts at least as much as the other homes. Our home faces Colonial Court directly. v
Our property will be affected by the increased traffic and associated noise.When there are evening events, we will have &
a steady stream of headlights shining into our living room as people leave.
a)
As Walter Kulbacki has stated, all residents of Colonial Court (plus my wife and I)voted against the construction of the
tennis courts on this site.We all moved to this area because of its peace. We like that it is removed from all the tumult a.
associated with sports activities and large gatherings of people. We are the most affected, yet we apparently have the z
least voice in the decision.
Also,the land being considered for the tennis facility was purchased not for active use, but rather to ensure that the co
property remained unused and under the control of Naples Heritage.There was a concern at the time that a third party <<',,
would purchase it and then demand the right of way to use it.
To my knowledge, tennis and other sports venues associated with other country clubs are located within easy access to
the clubhouse and dining facilities.The Colonial Court location is over a mile from the Naples Heritage clubhouse—a
considerable inconvenience for its users.
w
The Alternatives Analysis I've seen shows that site 10 meets the requirements, has a smaller wetland impact and the loss
in wetland function is only marginally larger than site 6. Additionally, it has the true advantage of proximity to club .J
facilities. It appears to me that site 10 will address the needs of Naples Heritage in a far greater way than the Colonial o
Court site, both now and in the distant future.
m
We stand united with the other residents of Colonial Court in requesting that you consider the alternate site and avoid O
the disruption to a peaceful neighborhood.
.c
Thank you for your consideration.
With best regards,
Stephen Rechter
Pamela Rechter
1
Packet Pg. 145
9.C.11
26D Wednesday,November 23,2016 Naples Daily News
O.therPLtbkcNOtlCes Other Public Notices •
•
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION
Notice is hereby given that on December 13, 2016, in the
Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor,
Collier Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples FL.,
the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will consider the
enactment of a County Resolution. The meeting will commence
at 9:00 A.M.The title of the proposed Resolution is as follows: iv
ui
RESOLUTION NO.2016-____
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO a
DISCLAIM,RENOUNCE AND VACATE A PORTION OF TRACT
C5 CONSERVATION AREA,AND A PORTION OF THE 10 FOOT
COLLIER COUNTY CONSERVATION BUFFER EASEMENT
WITHIN TRACT C5,AS SHOWN ON NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF
AND COUNTRY CLUB PHASE ONE,PLAT BOOK 26,PAGE 73 rn
OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA. m
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1/2 Q
MILE EAST OF SANTA BARBARA BLVD,AND 1 MILE SOUTHcc
OF DAVIS BLVD, IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PETITION CJ
VAC-PL20160001406) Q
A copy of the proposed Resolution is on file with the Clerk to the >
Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties areco
invited to attend and be heard. co
NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must
register with the County manager prior to presentation of o
the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be
limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual N
to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged.
If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or
organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. cc
Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in
the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum aa,
of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, as
written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall
be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of
seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in -O
presentations before the Board will become a permanent part ca
of the record.
0)
Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board w
will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and
therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and y
evidence upon which the appeal is based.
If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation
in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at
no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please
contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division,
located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-
5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting.
Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available
in the Board of County Commissioners Office.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA
DONNA FIALA,CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK
By: Martha Vergara,Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
November 23&30,2016 No.1364130
Packet Pg. 146
-^[��
q . 9.C.11
'!F/,...,4W nth , ,i ti[6 f<�.k 0, i,. '-
%.,r bitc�Tatic rattler Public Notices
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER A RESOLUTION
Notice is hereby given that on December 13, 2016, in the
Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor,
Collier Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East, Naples FL.,
the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will consider the
enactment of a County Resolution. The meeting will commence
at 9:00 A.M.The title of the proposed Resolution is as follows:
RESOLUTION NO.2016-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY z:
COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO
DISCLAIM,RENOUNCE AND VACATE A PORTION OF TRACT ;;
C5 CONSERVATION AREA,AND A PORTION OF THE 10 FOOT
COLLIER COUNTY CONSERVATION BUFFER EASEMENT
WITHIN TRACT C5,AS SHOWN ON NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF -
AND COUNTRY CLUB PHASE ONE,PLAT BOOK 26,PAGE 73 N
OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. "' in
THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 1/2 ' 0
MILE EAST OF SANTA BARBARA BLVD,AND 1 MILE SOUTH H
OF DAVIS BLVD, IN SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, `.
RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. (PETITION 3
A
VAC-PL20160001406) co
v =l
A copy of the proposed Resolution is on file with the Clerk to the m
cBoard and is available for inspection. All interested parties are =
a invited to attend and be heard., a7
a II
NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item mintcis
co register with the County manager prior to presentation of Z
the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be o
z limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual Q
o
to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. >
If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or
organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. ,l
oo
CD •Zt
u, Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in `
o the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum o
ry of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, c
o written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall N
Q1 be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of
Z seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in 0
presentations before the Board will become a permanent partas
'a of the record.
Na)
p Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board as
a+ will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and <
.Z. therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
Z proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and ca
evidence upon which the appeal is based. .
ii
'^ If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodatio
in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at
no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please c
contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, a)
located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112- E
5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. ,-
Assisted
Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available
cis
in the Board of County Commissioners Office.
Q
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ,
DONNA FIALA,CHAIRMAN
DWIGHT E. BROCK,CLERK
By: Martha Vergara, Deputy Clerk
(SEAL)
November 23 &30,2016 No. 1364130
Packet Pg. 147