Loading...
Agenda 01/10/2017 Item # 9A 9A 01/10/2017 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ***This item has been continued from the December 13, 2016 BCC Meeting.*** This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 95-74, the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 5.21± acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD; by revising the property description; by adding a recreation area to Tract A; by revising development standards; by amending the Master Plan; by adding a tennis center conceptual site plan and a landscape buffer exhibit; and providing an effective date. The subject property, consisting of 563± acres, is located south of Davis Boulevard and west of Collier Boulevard in Sections 3, 4, 9 And 10, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [PUDZ-PL20150001416] (Companion to agenda items 9.B And 9.C) OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board) review staff's findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition, render a decision regarding this PUD Amendment petition; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained. CONSIDERATIONS: The subject site is a±5.21-acre parcel of land that is currently located externally and abutting the southwest portion of the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Planned Unit Development (PUD). The applicant is requesting to rezone the parcel from Rural Agricultural (A) and incorporate it into the PUD. The parcel would be used for additional recreational facilities for the residents of the PUD, and a portion would be added to the preserve of the PUD. There are two (2) companion petitions that were submitted in connection with this PUD Amendment. The first is an application (VAC-PL20160001416) to vacate a portion of Tract C5 Conservation Area, including a portion of the 10-foot wide Collier County Conservation Buffer Easement within Tract 5 as shown on the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Phase One Plat, Plat Book 26, Page 73. The second companion petition (VAC-PL20160001403) is to vacate public right-of-way that is no longer needed and include this land in the project preserves. Staff is recommending approval of both vacation petitions. This PUD Amendment was reviewed by the CCPC on May 5, 2016. At the hearing, the applicant presented a conceptual site plan illustrating how the subject site would be developed. The CCPC recommended approval of the petition. Subsequent to that meeting, however, the applicant requested changes to the PUD Document, including changes to the conceptual site plan. The petitioner intended to present the changes to the Board on October 11,2016,but instead of hearing the petition,the Board voted to remand the petition to the CCPC. The applicant is requesting to modify the conceptual site plan by proposing a different location for the access point (to the subject parcel) as well as making further changes to the PUD Document related to the proposed use, exterior lighting, hours of operation, and amplified sound. It should be noted that since the initial CCPC hearing, there has been public opposition to this PUD Amendment,to the companion vacation petition(s), or to both. FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element (CIE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) as Packet Pg.30 9A 01/10/2017 needed to maintain an adopted Level of Service(LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the CCPC to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: Future Land Use Element (FLUE): The subject site is identified as Urban Designation,Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict in the FLUE of the GMP. Staff reviewed the proposed land uses for consistency with the Urban Designation. Adding the ±5.21 acres to the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD for the development of additional recreational facilities and a portion of this acreage for preserve are both non-residential uses listed (#2 - Parks, open space and recreational uses) in the Urban Designation of the FLUE and therefore, consistent with the GMP. As such, Comprehensive Planning staff finds this rezone petition may be deemed consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. Transportation Element: Transportation Planning staff reviewed the application and found this petition consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. There is no increase in the number of residential dwelling units/traffic generation, no changes to point(s) of access or circulation, and no changes to the developer commitments; therefore, there is no impact on the previous findings of approval. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the CCME. The acreage of preserve, as shown on the PUD Master Plan, will increase by approximately 3.9 acres with this amendment to the PUD [three (3) acres from vacation of the 100-foot wide right-of-way reservation and 0.9 acre from the parcel to be added to the PUD]. In total, approximately 251.9 acres or 44.7% of the land within the PUD, as shown on the PUD Master Plan, will be set aside as preserve. This acreage exceeds the twenty-five percent (25%) minimum native vegetation retention (preserve)requirement pursuant to CCME Policy 6.1.1. GMP Conclusion: The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC reviewed this petition at their November 17, 2016 meeting. The applicant gave a presentation, which included a different conceptual site plan than the version in each Commissioner's packet. Several members of the public came forward to speak. Commissioner Homiak made a motion to approve, which was seconded by Commissioner Chrzanowski. The vote to approve was unanimous (5-0) subject to the following stipulations: 1. Minimum setbacks as shown on RA site plan. 2. Use the new plans presented today. 3. Provide some assurance that the retention of native vegetation in the "natural areas" will be replaced if they do not survive. 4. No special events will occur after hours. 5. Hours will be more specific than reference to"dusk", applicant will use sunset. 6. Clarify the various details discussed on the RA site plan. 7. List any and all uses proposed for the building and label the sun shade buildings as to what they Packet Pg.31 9.A 01/10/2017 are. 8. Lighting will be with bollard lights. 9. Courts to be clay comparable to HarTru type courts. Commissioner Schmitt suggested that staff should communicate to the Board that the applicant's narrative and paperwork should indicate that tennis and recreational uses are proposed and the project intent is to use the site for more than just extra off-street parking. Opposition to this petition has been received. Opposition was voiced at the CCPC hearing. Notwithstanding a unanimous vote to approve by the CCPC, the petition is being placed under Advertised Public Hearings due to public opposition. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a proposed PUD Amendment and rezone. The burden falls upon the applicant for the amendment to prove that the proposal is consistent with all of the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the Board, should it consider denial, that such denial is not arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the amendment does not meet one or more of the listed criteria. Criteria for PUD Amendments Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer,water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities,both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such Packet Pg. 32 9.A 01/10/2017 regulations. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed PUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested PUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a"core"question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed PUD rezone on the availability of adequate public.facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as Packet Pg. 33 9.A 01/10/2017 amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the PUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the Board hearing as these items relate to these criteria. This item has been approved as to form and legality, and requires an affirmative vote of four for Board approval (HFAC). RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendation and stipulations of the CCPC, which are reflected in the attached PUD Ordinance and have no issue with the new location for the proposed access point and recommends that the Board approve the applicant's request to add 5.21± acres of land zoned A to the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD. Prepared by: Eric L. Johnson, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner, Zoning Division, Growth Management Department ATTACHMENT(S) 1. Attachment 1 - Staff Report(Nov 17 2016) (PDF) 2. Attachment 2 -Proposed Ordinance (PDF) 3. [Linked] Attachment 3 -Application and Support Material (PDF) 4. Attachment 4 - Items Presented by Applicant at CCPC(May 05 2016) (PDF) 5.Attachment 5 -Items Collected by Court Reporter at CCPC (Nov 17 2016) (PDF) 6. Attachment 6 -FLUE Consistency Review (PDF) 7.Attachment 7 -Vacation of Conservation Easement (PDF) 8. [Linked] Attachment 8 -Emails Letters from Public (as of Nov 30 2016)(PDF) 9. Attachment 9 -Legal Notifications (PDF) 10. Legal ad-Agenda ID 2333 (PDF) Packet Pg. 34 9.A 01/10/2017 COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 9.A Item Summary: ***This item has been continued from the December 13, 2016 BCC Meeting.*** This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to approve an Ordinance amending Ordinance No. 95-74, the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 5.21+ acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD; by revising the property description; by adding a recreation area to Tract A; by revising development standards; by amending the Master Plan; by adding a tennis center conceptual site plan and a landscape buffer exhibit; and providing an effective date. The subject property, consisting of 563+ acres, is located south of Davis Boulevard and west of Collier Boulevard in Sections 3, 4, 9 And 10, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [PUDZ-PL20150001416] (Companion to agenda item 9.B And 9.C) Meeting Date: 01/10/2017 Prepared by: Title: Operations Analyst, Senior—Administrative Services Department Name: Bendisa Marku 12/13/2016 1:57 PM Submitted by: Title: Division Director-Planning and Zoning—Zoning Name: Michael Bosi 12/13/2016 1:57 PM Approved By: Review: Growth Management Department Judy Puig Level 1 Division Reviewer Completed 12/13/2016 2:06 PM Zoning Michael Bosi Additional Reviewer Completed 12/14/2016 3:56 PM Zoning Ray Bellows Additional Reviewer Completed 12/14/2016 6:04 PM Growth Management Department James French Additional Reviewer Completed 12/14/2016 6:58 PM County Attorney's Office Heidi Ashton-Cicko Level 2 Attorney of Record Review Completed 12/15/2016 4:00 PM Growth Management Department Jeanne Marcella Level 2 Division Administrator Completed 12/16/2016 2:37 PM County Attorney's Office Jeffrey A.Klatzkow Level 3 County Attorney's Office Review Completed 12/16/2016 3:42 PM Office of Management and Budget Valerie Fleming Level 3 OMB Gatekeeper Review Completed 12/16/2016 4:42 PM Budget and Management Office Mark Isackson Additional Reviewer Completed 12/20/2016 3:13 PM County Manager's Office Nick Casalanguida Level 4 County Manager Review Completed 12/27/2016 1:54 PM Board of County Commissioners MaryJo Brock Meeting Pending 01/10/2017 9:00 AM Packet Pg. 35 9.A.1 CO 1 eY County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: NOVEMBER 17, 2016 0 SUBJECT: PUDZ-PL20150001416 NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB PUD co PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT & AGENT: a cc Owner/Applicant: Agent: •• CD ti Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club, Inc. Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP 8150 Heritage Club Way Hole Montes, Inc. Naples, FL 34112 950 Encore Way N Naples, FL 34110 > 0 There are hundreds of other property owners in this PUD. REQUESTED ACTION: 0- The The petitioner is requesting that the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) consider an t.6 application to amend Ordinance No. 95-74, the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Planned Unit Development (PUD), and to amend Ordinance No. 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code,by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 5.21±acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD. The application also includes revising the property description, adding a recreation area, revising development standards, amending Exhibit "A" Master Development Plan (hereinafter referred to as Master Plan), and providing an effective date. E The CCPC recommended approval of this petition on May 5, 2016. At the hearing, the applicant presented a conceptual site plan [see Attachment 3 -Items Presented by Applicant at CCPC(May 05 2016)] illustrating how the subject site would be developed. Subsequent to that meeting; however, the applicant requested changes to the PUD Document, including changes to the conceptual site plan, which is provided in this staff report after the location map. The petitioner PUDZ-PL20150001416- Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 1 of 12 November 4, 2016 Packet Pg. 36 9.A.1 intended to present the change to the Board of County Commissioners (Board), but the item was remanded to the CCPC. Since the initial CCPC hearing, there has been public opposition to this amendment request or to the companion request (VAC-PL20160001406) that would vacate a portion of Tract C5 Conservation Area, including a portion of the 10-foot wide Collier County Conservation Buffer Easement with Tract 5 as shown on the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Phase One, Plat Book 26, Page 73 (see Attachment 5 - Vacation of Conservation Easement and Attachment 6 -Emails_Letters from Public). 7 GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: Y The subject property, consisting of 5.21± acres, is located south of Davis Boulevard and west of v Collier Boulevard in Sections 3, 4, 9 and 10, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. f° PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: 0 a) The petitioner, who owns a 5.21±-acre parcel of land that is currently located externally and Y abutting the southwest border of the PUD, is requesting to add this parcel into the PUD to be used = for recreational purposes for the residents of the PUD. The master plan shows the subject parcel would be assigned two (2) land use categories, Recreation Area (RA) and Preserve (P). Most of co the parcel would be designated RA while the southern portion would be added to the preserve of the PUD. According to the applicant, "The application also seeks to change the southerly 100' of PUD totaling approximately 3.0 acres, from `possible future public thoroughfare right-of-way N acquisition' to preserve." These changes can be found in the proposed ordinance (see Attachment 1 - Proposed Ordinance). Since the future public thoroughfare right-of-way is contained in the subdivision plat, a vacation of this right-of-way is being processed separately (VAC- PL20160001403) as well as the aforementioned VAC-PL20160001406 petition. These vacation o petitions will be reviewed as companion items when the PUD Amendment is reviewed by the Board of County Commissioners (Board). Staff is recommending approval of both vacation petitions. Since the petition was reviewed by the CCPC on May 5,2016,the applicant is requesting to modify the conceptual site plan by proposing a different location for the access point (to the subject parcel) as well as making further chances to the proposed uses, exterior lighting, hours of operation, and amplified sound. G) f4 a) (See location map and revised conceptual site plan on the following pages) la PUDZ-PL20150001416- Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 2 of 12 November 4. 2016 Packet Pg. 37 11 ) ______011111 oI=1 1 9.A.1 Di 1 Laai wea ¢i 1§1 .1 < iliiI Ali Ell 111 01 m CIIIIIIK'S.11`7%--II1111.11111111111111t111UI/' `� f1 11►� _ q�� /nm',T; �O���iiiiiiiiiiii�♦♦oM.11.1.11011 ktiais i �QOM- MI E P. Illrlirilminintea. ` E amriet, 1 III4 \ ..., ,.._ il agOUHow 40.1 4 1 ( v, U �+von27 •♦11111 \ r J 1_ G =r., llll\\ V. i{� V 7 Ilan aaa pip L. A, 141111114111110011M amrurmy r �Il�nraaaa fn .+ Namiuir rwww V = lir 0 ie61LLi�M I[1atn 1 4 Y `/r-, •1At� row _ _!�jnnnn r• aigaiNfre.... 1111 es 4� �` -= ��Attq� i.,.� `j�iM` a n1 �1 O o , 40144044iigWlnlu►� �O 1 o1 j *+ 1 1 N ���. iiiumnlnyd� "ilka1 a1 + qr cu - . fro .� /�i �1111111111n♦\ 4414 � - .r. , ` `►♦♦ cu %% \ I I���. \\IIIIIIIIIIInI\\111NIIIID ',41— MI C 4'e ♦ nOmma0 ME u)n ♦Or 1I1OiiUNntal 11f' � . A� 1f ilillarPj I IP la 41 Mewl I rID/inununninnnntll "' I of 1-� 'g Z �► `i 1111111111:x- �� In 31V05 0110N , C. ❑j D C IL N \ w. O Z Ed �a¢ go < ¢ 1- L 0 o x W o tg� ` a �y UO xv x a d u. g a� N',.7,'4 ti o _ < 7-' 2f �, I 1: i nl �`tY w o5 U Hs i^ o I aw N: N w cz -x u- O >/ Y 1 .�I� m U �, E mom �' I���I `�� _� 106'x'0 I, �� I LJ ^�_go �� pB � �- r 0iVA31l108 8311100 �e < ,.l „w pe-p,..8 w ,�m "' // 0 w aavn31f108 21111C3 s4S6 210 •_NLIz x'6 eiw9p4IOtU" ..a.ot015V386y im -6E I'm oI ow5 Q ` N H o w I, NOOa83100V5 o n o 0 F= g F I .1 U I w r Q w_� voo o f w �w w N CU C7 � � 8g xlo w U 82 x ! U w Q Z o c x wa C:) 0a v,4 5` � ' ice— L7t7 ,1,‘L'.3aw O% o0 r �so - o cu „Z,d': ><Noz „ JQ I---. vs iw 'a x arvn lvevs 19 w< < Q 3 �c `s , i > � i w i s7< rs i ow j z V LI ; = I NOLLV1NYld �Un < Ztn ao ' d7 I 1 J aam,3lnoe ----rte $� tl21V8aV1BNV1NY5 f I I Il F VaV8aV8 V1NV5 l I x3 0 08en3100 vaveavewv1�s ��w 'zI �� Sm FC0 �1 - LL; moJ > -;i�l Vm = , a� m n maNm ' T N m — i iv oo UN w = N 12. V g I O Z < Iii r;.°1< �. w 6`¢ o - 1 1 OVCN8V8 AMT.,< —/ m E J i 53NV153 - -_ 7 �---, 'Ja38N3L11HM oa3aNauiwn ') �oo ; wo Packet Pg. 38 <a', '31Niod wnoao �'' w LUI 36, 8 NAPLES HERITAGE l\ / �� GCC PHASE TWO-A, l 9 A 1 TRACT DC4- RIGHT-OF-WAY PB 28, PGS 11-13 \\\ RESERVATION NAPLES HERITAGE - / I OCK B I1 I (I 1 GCC PHASE 1,PB 26,PGS 71-80 ii P.ASE TWO-A I / LOT 39, BLOCK B NAPLES HERITAGE II I III GCC PHASE TWO-A, \ PB 28, PGS 11-13 EX.LAKE \ \ I, II II I / 'A1FR CONTROL STRUCTURE TRACT GC48.NAPLES HERITAGE �� \ I I I I 1\ GCC TRACTS 8&CS REPLAT, PB - ----I I \ \ 27,PGS 98-100 LOCK F, 1I , ,_\ ` III I III I NAPLES BHERITAGE GCC PHASE TWO-A, 11-13 I TRACT CS-CONSERYAPIXI ARE; I PB 28, PGS 11-13 /�- NAPLES fLAT,P8C 7,C TRACTS 0 I I TRACT CS-CONSEINATON AREA \ ECS fQPUT,PB 27,PGS 98-100 II li NAPLES HERITAGE G'S TRACTS B k LS REPUi,PB 27,PGS 9B-700 __ --/ II - -- --_ . SE5'3.,42 E 326.is (m) LOT 5, BLOCK F, 1 NAPLES HERITAGE GCC PHASE TWO-A, U i-• PB 28, PGS 11-13 L's : LCL II �I 0 NATURAL AREA 0 L,,,,,. I-- CCII II = ,) U I LOT 4, BLOCK F, as LI NAPLES HERITAGE ` ��IIQII GCC PHASE TWO-A, O IZ, PB 28,PGS 11-13 ,^ O V A0 ' OJ d II I PRE TURNAROUND _ PAR G ARI A - - A• I 2 �$ LOT 3,BLOCK F CD S E l I I II,�Wt'.' i l ., I II I NAPLES HERITAG_ IIS •• GCC PHASE TWO-A, �i �� \PB zH, PGS 11-13 I i MI WI • /: K// 4-7 t 1 0 II Iir; I •/ 'I LCT 1,BLOCK F z I pA I I NAPLES HERITAGE o GCC PHASE TWO-A, ` m I I �. PB 28,PGS 11-13 ..,c, gi Cn UR (3 - I �! I ■ \ITENINI, 1 141111 ■ �` 8, a \ J 1 i • . 4 4_______9 .. . : ....,f W4 4 4 \ �� 4 4 Q2 4 .. 4 .. 4 a 4 W 4 4 a .r 4 a 4 4 4 a 4 4 CCy 4 W ' W 4 4 4" TRACT CD-CONSERVATION AREA NAPLES HERITAGE GCC PHASE 1, +-. PB 26, PGS 71-BO C) 4 4 4 + WCZ 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 W 4 4 4PROPOSEDCONSERVATION AREA 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Q 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 W 4 4 4 4 - TRACT RW4-RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION NAPLES HERITAGE GCC 4.4 4 4 4 4 v. 4„W W 4.4.4 W 4.4 4 W 4 * - PHASE 1,PB 26, PGS 71-80 . .4..4.4.4.4*v ...4583'2=<."v.37E92(. 4`4*„1* +'4.W W 4.. 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 Nas'23'2'U 32E.3',, + 4 I 4 4 4 a EXHIBIT "A-1 ” NAPLES HERITAGE TENNIS CENTER CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN Packet Pg. 39 NO SCALE 9.A.1 SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: This section of the staff report identifies the land uses and zoning classifications for properties surrounding the subject site. 27 o North: Tract C5 Conservation and Buffer Easement (water management area), then farther north are single-family dwellings, zoned Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD. East: Tract C5 Conservation and Buffer Easement, including a portion of a ten (10)- foot wide Collier County Conservation and Buffer Easement/Tract RW4 100 ° U o foot wide Future Right of-Way Reservation. Farther northeast is right-of-way for Colonial Court, still farther northeast are single-family dwellings. All „° aforementioned lands are zoned Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD. o N ro South: Vacant/undeveloped land Tract E (for future multi-family residential), zoned Shadow Wood PUD. �, a rmir u) West: Vacant/undeveloped land, zoned A. a 03 z a ` '''''''C''''V-4., - Sys '" 7rweiNA LESIP.-- �� r + ° �` o� ` a +' ' 9'''''..."7' {�-; � u-41'41,44-,,,, �w, �s s . - HERITAGE " s '` r lH e Gj # fi ~ ,5. '� '," ,,,..; '1---..i.- GB�Cc 5r,•' w"`--- y�&9.-�-a te `� 2 :ia cif > r'"'s ss.. .t,--=,:, '' '� � '� i� � 3 '�' 4' t .... �f' r'r�-.. ,,'„,&,,,t,":;:::„"-i-,,,:.; a�`', - :. a -v: i fi i'- s; .,,t Avg f O sr .fi 9 '� �xr f' *Y"$' .�r r7� " _y ., z N k...,„ '? •: , Subject Property L .:"xr o`n znning; ,.. . , ° '. z�^' ,.•--- '� 5� � $,T H e%tyt�a,9 � flt3D ^sr a rz �, rr}+ G dd yam kkY. Y :� P i'.H,�' Rw b£` • Y^ � r ..4'11-:''-'''ir::::&-`.::' ..i.''''..;-,,,,...-.,-; �^. , k £ LL 317. .l I, ]� / N 3 Y ,:ct y . Lc. .fid, ,"," Y- .4+ '7'7 t Y,4 ,< �ORinif A E.y. "5 .4 .. ..•-:..:-. 4 ,-, r ar` r� �.- r•. .�„' z ,... ,,,,_.- ..:-.„,,,,,„„,,,,,-,..., ,,,,+..„ , ,,•,, ^z .� a .r r Zoning Ar -J K p.,,/„1:',;,....17:41.:'',,-' �' Sae k i ax q . 9. ' a - to - 3 • S .&4 .r "+£".r yy.* a Imo` tv SF.,`z4G Nom'” P o Iii"�TAf•1.`,,,,..2i:,,t-"'IL-1*';'''.::151$4:::-.t -; '..'X, t' J.Allt,t's +/-7.. ' ,,,,e;..:',,-' w r `' CJ ti i6{. 1 r cx #" £ SHADOW r a Q ",�, v. 's ,.a+ r,t ii,.., s WOOD *' .' v ,v-4 s ,r r.. e +� "p ri. a '' �` `{r 'tom E _ h .*+ •'-. 3� $a ddi�d+ ''FF i� -�^ i'� i' r 1 t ,r a x, " 7 � .+s _ k 4 �`vr in9 C E _ x � I Pt3 t .,.,. -WhJi,tak epi RRD. N:1,-;:7,,,.:,,,-,..,*:,Th •cam ,.. tk ' �.. ^.'f-moi, ' :1J ..�ruuz''"`..s. '_. w _.z. �' _: _ `-;i ' =.s. Aerial (County GIS) PUDZ PL20150001416 Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 3 of 12 November 4, 2016 Packet Pg. 40 9.A.1 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: Future Land Use Element(FLUE): The subject site is identified as Urban Designation, Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). Staff reviewed the proposed land uses for consistency with the Urban Designation. Adding the a 5.21± acres to the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD for the development of additional 5 recreational facilities and a portion of this acreage for preserve are both non-residential uses listed (#2 Parks, open space and recreational uses)in the Urban Designation of the FLUE and therefore, = consistent with the GMP (see Attachment 4 - FLUE Consistency Review). coy 73 03 Transportation Element: 0 0 Transportation Planning staff reviewed the application and found this petition consistent with 0 Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the GMP. There is no increase in the number of residential dwelling units/traffic generation,no changes to point(s) of access or circulation, and no i changes to the developer commitments; therefore, there is no impact on the previous findings of a approval. co z Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): to N `" Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the CCME. The acreage of preserve, as shown on the PUD Master Plan, will increase by approximately 3.9 acres with this c amendment to the PUD [three (3) acres from vacation of the 100-foot wide right-of-way ti reservation and 0.9 acre from the parcel to be added to the PUD]. In total, approximately 251.9 acres or 44.7% of the land within the PUD, as shown on the PUD Master Plan, will be set aside as o z preserve. This acreage exceeds the twenty-five percent (25%) minimum native vegetation retention (preserve)requirement pursuant to CCME Policy 6.1.1. a cc GMP Conclusion: y in The GMP is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this proposed rezoning. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for approval, approval with conditions, or E denial of any rezoning petition. This petition is consistent with the GMP. 0 ;:"'t ANALYSIS: am Applications for amendments to, or rezoning to, the PUD shall be in the form of a PUD Master 7.3 co Plan of development along with a list of permitted and accessory uses and a development standards table. The PUD Application shall also include a list of developer commitments and any proposed deviations from the LDC. Staff has completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5,Planning Commission Recommendation(commonly referred to as the"PUD PUDZ-PL20150001416- Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 4 of 12 November 4, 2016 Packet Pg. 41 9.A.1 Findings"), and Section 10.02.08.F, Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report (referred to as "Rezone Findings"), which establish the legal basis to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses the aforementioned criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the BCC, who in turn use the criteria to support its action on the rezoning or amendment request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading "Zoning Services Analysis." In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD Document to address environmental concerns. The project does not require review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) since the project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. There are no impacts or changes in location to previously approved preserves, as shown on the PUD Master Plan, and no listed species of cc wildlife were observed on-site during the listed species survey performed by the environmental consultant. The proposed PUD Amendment will add approximately 3.9 acres of preserve to the PUD [three (3) acres from vacation of the 100-foot wide right-of-way reservation and 0.9 acre from the parcel to be added to the PUD]. Landscape Review: No buffer is proposed along, the south boundary of the RA-zoned area of the a subject parcel because it would abut a preserve. The Master Plan illustrates that a ten (10)-foot z wide buffer is proposed along the west property line of the subject parcel where abutting the A- zoned lands. Finally, the Master Plan shows that a twenty-five (25)-foot wide buffer is proposed along the east boundary of the subject parcel, internal to the PUD. Essentially, this buffer would `=' be combined with the twenty-five(25)-foot wide strip of natural area that results from the approval of the companion petition (VAC-PL20160001406), which seeks to vacate that portion of Tract C5 Conservation and Buffer Easement. Staff has reviewed the PUD Document and the master plan and has no issues with the requested changes. o z Transportation Review: Transportation Planning staff has reviewed the petition request, the PUD Document, and the Master Plan for compliance with Collier County Access Management ce Resolution Number 13-257; and as noted above, for consistency with the transportation elements of the GMP. Transportation Planning staff is recommending approval of the request. Utilities Review: Approved. No comment. Zoning Services Review: The proposed Master Plan shows that the parcel that would be co incorporated into Tract A of the Naples Golf and Country Club PUD and assigned the "RA" land use category. The applicant proposes a new principal use under Section 3.2.A.4 of the PUD Document, which reads as follows: "4. Recreation area.labeled RA on the Master Plan.limited to tennis courts,restrooms, landscaping, and stormwater facilities, for use by all residents and guests." Staff has no issue with any of the uses proposed in the RA land use category. As a means of further controlling the future design of this parcel, the proposed ordinance includes a conceptual site plan, PUDZ-PL20150001416- Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 5 of 12 November 4, 2016 Packet Pg. 42 9.A.1 illustrating the location of the tennis courts,restrooms,and off-street parking areas. The remaining undeveloped portions of the site would be comprised of natural/preserve areas. The PUD Document contains new setbacks for principal structures in the RA land use category. The proposed setbacks listed in Section 3.6.F are as follows: Front yard: 50 feet a Side yard: 25 feet Rear yard: 25 feet Preserve: 25 feet a U Staff has no issue with any of the proposed setbacks. The PUD Document also contains limitations on building height, exterior lighting, and hours of operation. Amplified sound shall be prohibited. CISo 0 PUD FINDINGS: 00 ra z.'. LDC Section 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the CCPC shall make i findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria in addition to the m findings in LDC Section 10.02.08": Z.co z 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in cc relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, N drainage,sewer, water, and other utilities. a Potable water and sanitary sewer lines are in the vicinity of the subject parcel. o Notwithstanding the fact that new recreational facilities are proposed next to residential areas, the proposed Master Plan shows that Colonial Court would serve both as a means of o access and as a separation between the two land uses. Based on this design, which would z include appropriate buffering, in conjunction with the development standards contained in `o at the PUD Document, staff determined the intended recreational use would be compatiblece with the existing development in the area. m ZS 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, cn contracts, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly y as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. asQ Documents submitted with the application,which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. The applicant states that "the 0 continuing operation and maintenance of areas and facilities that are private (not to be v provided or maintained at public expense) shall be maintained through the existing ct homeowners association. Additionally, the development will be required to obtain SDP approval. This processes [sic] will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of and continuing operation and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer." PUDZ-PL20150001416- Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 6 of 12 November 4, 2016 Packet Pg.43 9.A.1 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals,objectives,and policies of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). County staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives, and policies of the GMP within the GMP Consistency portion of this staff report (or within an accompanying memorandum). 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements,restrictions on design,and buffering (7.)- and and screening requirements. Section 3.11 of the PUD Document indicates that"Buffers shall be installed along the rear yard of multi-family or recreational facilities which abut off-site single-family zoned or vacant agriculturally zoned lands." The Master Plan shows buffers would be placed along the east and west boundaries of the subject parcel. c� a) 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. A majority of the acreage associated with the subject property is to be used for recreational purposes with the remaining used as a natural/preserve area. The applicant's response to this criterion was, "There are adequate areas within usable open space proximate to and nearby this development. The existing PUD contains approximately 103 acres of golf i° course; 248 acres of preserve; and 87 acres of lake." The site will be required to N demonstrate compliance with usable open space requirements at the time of SDP review. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of ensuring the adequacy of ti available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 0 z The roadway infrastructure is sufficient to serve the proposed project, as noted in the L Transportation Element consistency review. �. 0 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. The area has adequate supporting infrastructure, such as wastewater disposal systems and potable water supplies to accommodate this project based upon the commitments made by the petitioner and the fact that adequate public facilities requirements will be addressed when development approvals are sought. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations,or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. No deviations are being requested with this petition. PUDZ-PL20150001416- Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 7 of 12 November 4, 2016 Packet Pg.44 9.A.1 Rezone Findings: LDC Subsection 10.02.08.F states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable": 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals,objectives,and policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Comprehensive Planning staff determined the subject petition is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the FLUM and other elements of the GMP. C6 2. The existing land use pattern. 0 The existing land use pattern (of the abutting properties) is described in the Surrounding a, Land Use and Zoning section of this staff report. Staff determined the recreational facilities proposed in connection with this amendment are appropriate for this area of the County. By adding the±5.21 acres, the PUD density would decrease from 1.43 dwelling units per acre to 1.42 dwelling units per acre. 15 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. to The parcel proposed to be added into the PUD directly abuts another PUD. It is staff's opinion that this would not create an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. r- 4. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing > conditions on the property proposed for change. The subject parcel is currently owned by the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club, Inc., a who purchased the property in 2004. The boundary of the PUD would change if the new parcel were incorporated into the PUD, but not to the extent that the new PUD boundary would be illogically drawn. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed rezoning m necessary. The proposed change is not necessary, per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. Staff does not anticipate the new uses would adversely impact living conditions in the neighboring community. PUDZ-PL20150001416- Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 8 of 12 November 4, 2016 Packet Pg. 45 9.A.1 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has sufficient capacity to serve the proposed project at this time. The project is subject to the Transportation commitments contained in the PUD Ordinance, which includes provisions to address public safety. -3 U 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. 0 U Stormwater Best Management Practices, flow paths, treatment, and storage from this project will be addressed through Environmental Resource Permitting with the South Florida Water Management District, and County staff will evaluate all required stormwater calculation, site plans, and documentation during the development review process. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. It is not anticipated that this amendment would significantly reduce light or air to the adjacent areas. y 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent er area. N it This is a subjective determination based upon anticipated results, which may be internal or external to the subject property. Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination > is driven by market value. There is no guarantee that the project will be marketed in a manner comparable to the surrounding developments. 0. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Staff does not anticipate the proposed amendment at the subject site would be a deterrent cuto the improvement of the vacant land to the west or to the south. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare. If the proposed development complies with the GMP through the proposed amendment, then that constitutes a public policy statement supporting zoning, actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. PUDZ-PL20150001416- Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 9 of 12 November 4, 2016 Packet Pg. 46 9.A.1 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. Recreational facilities are not permitted in the A zoning district. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County. U It is staff's opinion the proposed uses and associated development standards and developer commitments will ensure that the project is not out of scale with the needs of the E' community. c> 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. c6" a> The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC, u and staff does not specifically review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. z 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration, which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses z under the proposed zoning classification. ti N Any development anticipated by the PUD Document would require considerable site alteration, and this project will undergo extensive evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the SDP, and again later as part of the building ti permit process. 0 z 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth a Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The project will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in LDC Section 6.02 regarding Adequate Public Facilities (APF) and the project will need to be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities, except as may be exempt by federal regulations. This petition has been reviewed by County staff responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the amendment process and z those staff persons have concluded that no Level of Service will be adversely impacted with the commitments contained in the PUD Document. The concurrency review for APF a, is determined at the time of SDP review. fS 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners (BCC)shall deem important in the protection of the public health,safety,and welfare. To be determined by the Board during its advertised public hearing. PUDZ-PL20150001416- Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 10 of 12 November 4, 2016 Packet Pg. 47 9.A.1 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): The agent conducted a duly noticed NIM on February 9,2016 at the Collier County South Regional Library at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway. The applicant summarized the petition by indicating the project intent was to construct a small building for refreshments and a pro-shop, but that the primary use will be for tennis courts (see Attachment 2 -Application. and Support Material). The attendees asked questions related to the anticipated development process: likelihood and length of time for project approval: whether there are other lands that can be improved with tennis courts: the anticipated buildable area for the subject parcel,and the future for the non-buildable areas (e.g., Will it become preserve? Maintenance/oversight of preserve?): the number of departments reviewing the petition; and property owner notification. It should be noted that subsequent to the original CCPC hearing, staff received letters of objection to the project as contained in Attachment 6 - Emails_Letters from Public. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: a, The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on October 31, 2016. RECOMMENDATION: a a) z Staff recommends the CCPC forward this petition to the BCC with a recommendation of approval. ti csi Attachments: 1) Proposed Ordinance 2) Application and Support Material 3) Items Presented by Applicant at CCPC (May 5, 2016) 4) FLUE Consistency Review > 5) Vacation of Conservation Easement 6) Emails_Letters from Public 7) Legal Notifications t as 0) a, U co Y C, U r.+ PUDZ-PL20150001416- Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 11 of 12 November 4, 2016 Packet Pg. 48 9.A.1 PREPARED BY: /V�� fFr /U ERIC JOHNSON, AICP, CFM, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION U L REVIEWED BY: 0 ll' 2, - l U cp RAYM9D V. ELLOWS,ZONING—MANAGER DATE ZONING DIVISION d tora€ -- tc m MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION N ti APPROVED BY: 'o z GI, � 1/ f pp cc ✓ B�. 6 (%1AfvfES FRENCH, DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE in GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT co E i DAVID S. WILKISOR` DATE DEPARTMENT HEAD GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PUDZ-PL20150001416-Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD Page 12 of 12 Packet Pg.49 9.A.2 ORDINANCE NO. 16 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 95-74, THE NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AN z ADDITIONAL 5.21± ACRES OF LAND ZONED RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) TO NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB PUD; BY REVISING THE PROPERTY o DESCRIPTION; BY ADDING A RECREATION AREA TO TRACT A; BY REVISING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; BY AMENDING THE MASTER PLAN; BY ADDING A TENNIS CENTER CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND A LANDSCAPE BUFFER EXHIBIT; AND cD PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, cc CONSISTING OF 563± ACRES, IS LOCATED SOUTH OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND WEST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD IN SECTIONS 3, 4, 9 and 10, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. [PUDZ-PL20150001416] c WHEREAS, on December 12, 1995, the Board of County Commissioners approved =' as Ordinance No. 95-74, which established the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Planned a Unit Development (PUD); and 0 -0 WHEREAS, Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP of Hole Montes, Inc. representing Naples 2 Heritage Golf and Country Club, Inc., petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier n_ County, Florida, to amend Ordinance 95-74, the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD, as amended. 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: 7- U SECTION ONE: Zoning Classification. The zoning classification of approximately 5.21+ Acres of the herein described real property located in Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from a Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district, together with the existing RPUD, for a 563± acre parcel to Words underlined are added;words st+u4 through are deleted [15-CPS-01482]222 Naples Heritage—PUDZ-PL20150001416 Page 1 of 9 11/29/16 Packet Pg. 50 9.A.2 be known as the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD document attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance No. 95-74 as amended by this Ordinance. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: Amendment to in Section I, Property Ownership and Description, of the PUD Document of Ordinance Number 95-74, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD. Section I, Property Ownership and Description, of the Planned Unit Development Document, previously attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance Number 95-74, the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD, is hereby amended as follows: � I a SECTION I o CD PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION a1 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 71. z The North half(N 1/2) of the North half(N 1/2) of Section 10, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, less the easterly 100 feet thereof. AND The East half(E 1/2) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, ra Florida. EXCEPT the Southeast Quarter (SE 'A) of the Southeast Quarter(SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter(SE 1/4) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. o ALSO EXCEPT the Southwest Quarter(SW 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of the o Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier °; County, Florida. a1 AND The Southerly 1,370 feet of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, lying southerly of Davis Boulevard (S.R. 84). a) AND The Southeast quarter (SE 1/4) less the southerly 1,370 feet of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, lying southerly of Davis Boulevard (S.R. `t 84). AND Words underlined are added;words struck through are deleted [15-CPS-01482]222 Naples Heritage—PUDZ-PL20150001416 Page 2 of 9 11/29/16 Packet Pg. 51 9.A.2 The North half(N 1/2) of the West half(W 1/2) of the West half(W '/2) of the Southwest quarter(SW 1/4) of Section 3, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, lying southerly of Davis Boulevard (S.R. 84). AND The East t/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest '/4 of the Southeast 1/4, Section 9, Township 50, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. * * * * * * * * * * * * 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION U The 55-8 563 acre project site is comprised of portions of Sections 3, 4, 9 & 10, Township 50 S, Range 26 E. The irregularly shaped development parcel abuts Davis ci Boulevard on the north and CR 951 on the east. The primary development objective is anCII 18 hole regulation golf course and country club, together with a maximum of 799 single and multiple family dwelling units. Maximum gross project density is 4-43 1.42 units per 0 acre. a) * * * * * * * * * * * * U' 1.6 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE as z cc Development of The Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club will comply with N the goals and objectives set forth in the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. A. The subject property is within the Urban Mixed Use District/Urban Residential Subdistrict as identified on the Future Land Use Map as set forth in Objective 1, of the Future Land Use Element(FLUE), and the uses contemplated are consistent therewith. 0 d N B. The proposed density of Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club is -1-41-3 1.42 units per acre and less than the maximum density permitted by the FLUE E Density Rating System is therefore consistent with the Future Land Use Element Policy 5.1. The entire subject property qualifies for a base density of four units per acre. Certain parts of the subject property are further subject to density adjustments including a proximity to Activity Center density bonus. c r v Words underlined are added;words coq are deleted [15-CPS-01482]222 Naples Heritage—PUDZ-PL2015000)416 Page 3 of 9 11/29/16 Packet Pg. 52 9.A.2 SECTION THREE: Amendment to Section II,Project Development, of the PUD Document of Ordinance Number 95-74,Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD. Section II,Project Development, of the Planned Unit Development Document, previously attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance Number 95-74, the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD, is hereby amended as follows: SECTION II U PROJECT DEVELOPMENT C U C ca 2.4 MAXIMUM PROJECT DENSITY 0 No more than 799 combined single and multiple family dwelling units shall be rn constructed in the g 563 acre total project area. If all 799 dwelling units are c constructed, gross project density will be 1.4-3 1.42 units per acre. a SECTION FOUR: Amendment to Section III, Tract A Development Regulations, of the PUD Document of Ordinance Number 95-74, Naples N Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD. Section III, Tract A Development Regulations, of the Planned Unit Development c Document, previously attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance Number 95-74, the Naples Heritage =a Golf and Country Club PUD, is hereby amended as follows: 0 a) SECTION III °a 0 TRACT A DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS * * * * * * * * * * a) U ca 3.2 USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land use, in whole or part, for other than the following: 7 A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family detached dwellings. 2. Single family attached dwellings, zero lot-line and patio dwellings and/or multi-family units. Words underlined are added;words struck through arc deleted 115-CPS-01482]222 Naples Heritage—PUDZ-PL20150001416 Page 4 of 9 11/29/16 Packet Pg. 53 9.A.2 3. An 18 hole golf course, clubhouses and related facilities, practice driving range, and golf course maintenance facility. These facilities will be substantially completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the 390th dwelling unit. 4. Recreation Area, labeled RA on the Master Plan, limited to tennis courts, restrooms, storage space, and roofed and unroofed seating areas, landscaping and stormwater facilities, for use by all residents and guests, and generally as depicted on Exhibit "A-1 Naples Heritage Tennis Center conceptual site plan . B. Accessory Uses: • 1. Accessory uses and structures customary in golf course, single and multiple family residential projects. 2. Project sales and administrative offices, which may occur in a residential or recreational building and/or in the Country Club complex, and/or in a temporary building until such time as permanent structures are available. 0 3. Model dwellings, in the single family lot are and/or in the single family/ a, multiple family tracts, during the period of project development and sales. Model dwellings shall be converted to permanent residents at the end of a two year period unless otherwise CO" specifically approved by the County. cp 4. Signs as permitted by the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time permits are requested. .. r- 3.3 3.3 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS a A maximum of 799 dwelling units may be constructed in this 5.--5$563 acre ct project. =a 0 Q.. 3.6 MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS AND OTHER DEVELOPMENTSTANDARDS Q F. Recreation area, labeled RA on the Master Plan f4 Jr 1. Setbacks for Structures and Tennis Courts: a. From the east boundary of the RA tract: (i) A minimum of 140 feet to the restroom/storage structure; (ii) A minimum of 168 feet to the tennis courts: and Words underlined are added,words struck-through are deleted [15-CPS-01482]222 Naples Heritage—PUDZ-PL20150001416 Page 5 of 9 11/29/16 Packet Pg. 54 9.A.2 (iii) A minimum of 152 feet to the small courtside shade structures. b. From the west boundary of the RA tract: (i) A minimum of 30 feet to any structure: and (ii) A minimum of 30 feet to tennis courts. U c. From the north boundary of the RA tract: a minimum of 65 feet to E any structure and to tennis courts. U d. From any preserve or conservation easement boundary: a minimum of 29 feet for tennis court and principal and accessory structures. cc 2. Lighting: Lighting shall be limited to bollard style as may be necessary for public safety and security and shall be limited to a maximum 4 feet in height. t.. 3. Maximum height: Maximum height shall be limited to one story not to exceed 12 Feet Zoned and 15 feet Actual Heiuht. 0 0 4. Other Limitations and Operational Conditions: 0 N a. The hours of operation shall be limited to 7:00 a.m. to sunset. b. Amplified sound of any type shall not be permitted. U R c. The tennis courts shall be Har-Tru, clay. or a comparable surface. ° d. When special events. such as member guest tournaments, are held 0 at the Tennis Center. additional parking and shuttle services will be provided at the Clubhouse. Special events are subject to the 7:00 a.m. to sunset limitation set forth in a.. above. Words underlined are added;words stiusl rossgh are deleted [15-CPS-01482]222 Naples Heritage—PUDZ-PL20I50001416 Page 6 of 9 11/29/16 Packet Pg. 55 9.A.2 e. In the areas labeled Natural Area on PUD master plan Exhibit "A- l" Naples Heritage Tennis Center Conceptual Site Plan, existing vegetation shall be retained to the greatest degree possible, after removal of any exotic vegetation. In the event that existing vegetation dies, it shall be replaced with the same or a comparable plant type, and shall be replanted in the future as needed. In no case shall there be less than 50% of the native vegetation remaining. If clearing results in less than 50% of retained native vegetation, then supplemental plantings shall be required to achieve 50% of the original native vegetation. U O U c 3.11 REQUIRED BUFFERSCD Buffers shall be installed along the rear yard of multi-family sites or recreational facilities which abut off-site single family zoned or vacant agriculturally zoned lands. Buffers shall separate the single family and multi-family development areas unless the necessity for such buffers is waived due to a common architectural theme housing project. Buffers shall meet the criteria set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code. Buffering a requirements may be met with existing natural vegetation, installed vegetation, structural screening, or any combination thereof. Buffering plans shall be submitted to and approved by the Collier County Development Services Director prior to issuance of r- permits for the facility required to be buffered. CC SECTION FIVE: Amendments to Section VI, Traffic Requirements, of the PUD Document of Ordinance Number 95-74, Naples Heritage Golf 0 and Country Club PUD. Section VI, Traffic Requirements of the Planned Unit Development Document, previously attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance Number 95-74, the Naples Heritage Golf and °- Country Club PUD, is hereby amended as follows: C3 SECTION VI TRAFFIC REQUIREMENTS U co 6.2 IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS * * * * * * * * * * * * G. Commitment is hereby made that the seutherly 100 feet of that portion of the -- ' .. - -• - - - .- -- . •, Words underlined are added;words sxask-through are deleted [15-CPS-01482]222 Naples Heritage—PUDZ-PL20150001416 Page 7 of 9 11/29/16 Packet Pg. 56 9.A.2 right of way acquisition. * * * * * * * * * * * * SECTION SIX: Amendments to Section VIII, Water Management Requirements, of the PUD Document of Ordinance Number 95-74,Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD. Section VIII, Water Management Requirements, of the Planned Unit Development Document, previously attached as Exhibit A to Ordinance Number 95-74, the Naples Heritage U Golf and Country Club PUD, is hereby amended as follows: SECTION VIIIco WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS * * * * * * * * * * * * L 8.2 THE WATER MANGEMENT PLAN CONCEPT 354.1 acres of the 5--5-8 563 acre project is planned as a stormwater catchment basin. 68.7 acres of lakes and 91.9 acres of natural/preserve area are included in this area. Stormwater originating on lands to the north of the project will flow through the project by using culverts, swales, and preserved areas of the site in a manner intended to duplicate predevelopment conditions. a) Flood protection will be provided to the project by raising buildings, roads, etc. in o conformance with South Florida Water Management District criteria for building pad elevation is the 100-yr./zero-discharge storm elevation and the minimum road elevation is based on the 25 year storm event. After heavy rainfall events, surface waters stored in the o catchment areas will be slowly discharged through small bleed down structures into the existing preserved wetland slough. Off-site outfalls which receive stormwater discharge from the property will likely undergo modification in the future due to development/modification, at which time modifications to the Naples Heritage Golf and E Country Club water management plan may be required. ca ca SECTION SEVEN: Amendments to PUD Master Development Plan of Ordinance Number 95-74, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD. " Exhibit A, Master Development Plan to the Planned Unit Development Document, previously attached to Ordinance Number 95-74, the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD, is hereby deleted in its entirety and hereby replaced with Exhibit "A", PUD Master Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein. Words underlined are added;words st slt-threagh are deleted [15-CPS-01482]222 Naples Heritage—PUDZ-PL20150001416 Page 8 of 9 11/29/16 Packet Pg. 57 9.A.2 SECTION EIGHT: Amendments to PUD Document of Ordinance Number 95-74, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD to add a Conceptual Site Plan. The Planned Unit Development Document, previously attached to Ordinance Number 95- 74, the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD, is hereby amended to add Exhibit "A-2", Naples Heritage Tennis Center Conceptual Site Plan, attached hereto and incorporated herein. U SECTION NINE: Amendments to PUD Document of Ordinance Number 95-74, Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD to add a Landscape Buffer Exhibit. U c m The Planned Unit Development Document, previously attached to Ordinance Number 95- 74, the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD, is hereby amended to add Exhibit "A-2", 0 Naples Heritage Tennis Center 25' Landscape Buffer Exhibit attached hereto and incorporated herein. d 2 SECTION TEN: Effective Date. a) 1. ea This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. ti N PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County a, Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. this day of , 2016. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK_ CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA n By: By: Deputy Clerk DONNA FIALA, Chairman iv E Approved as to form and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney i Attachment: Exhibit A— Master Development Plan to Planned Unit Development Document Exhibit A-1 —Naples Heritage Tennis Center Conceptual Site Plan Exhibit A-2 —Naples Heritage Tennis Center 25' Landscape Buffer Exhibit Words underlined are added;1VOrds suook-thcoueh are deleted (1 CPS-014821 222 Naples Heritage—PUDZ-P1.20150001416 Page 9 of 9 1.'29'1 6 Packet Pg. 58 65 `6d la)i3ed —. Z 0 o a i ^ N o O a Q N M 00 n O a 4 0 4G 0 is O in Y e- N O?O O O 0 N i 00 d O Ooo6 ONN O iv' 0 _ '0A1821311100- 656'Z!''J @@ N N - i, -mss II of Z �, ng Wm a p= > ccH Q g tZr� uwi Zm =z. w p N 3 w 0 UZ p> Q L)Z FiT W °a z3 " Q Szo " a - o H��t Z a �W w e= Z 5- a� J CC Oar < J f'"� 0 Lc,ZW� c=7 P> ir.J g 1 o W p WZV E w J-.. 2 Y N a u J ¢2 a.a.a N 0 a j X D z �1_ F f=a Ur yyyy a a a Liles < . a33 < a ' m N � o u.zc 3 c ao Zi ZZZZ 0 J 005<<Ill w a aw.o i WW W W N o �0.W.iJE O = W SYS Z. pp pp Y H- Zuo . �� ag "� !Ilk0,,,,,.. cn a) y es>> J O a Z a U y Z O 7 a O Q U Q O .0 C) C W J- J W ppm U N UWJJW HWV1 WCOW W 05'3 D () a w W W W - CO W C W to a g w 0 Jp 1-tq N lU CZCLYWCJ CC Q7zw `1 = 3�Su'2 ac9 � adg�Cr ��°W U I O 5 ez O 1- t -• 0 -p s a it N wHaBe 0Q U L W a�`< ZCD i p tX 1 I W a ° o s �� w a v Y V a z o� C90 W o Cl' �I a WLil 2 \1 U O '� Q to 1 0 U` (n i. V S m \ LU a W Ct v _ W a a a � Z >- Z oo v UJ - o 0 'd A � eIe OCD m CD a = Lu y cl to O — rilminixz � a \\ae d $ JQ CLL ��O _ 7C73 ,\,1 2 lit1 a8 o bis, / CD C....D 2 Z S��by a 4a~ „ cu .` az o °' /1 c� \ a W 0 >1Z D as ' r Q d w �a\a�l � - a ��1 " Ili 2 u) CC W �\ \ 1 Z W = Q. Y '> \\L a Z ° �< \� O N LL J w \�� a j--� 0 P r C 0 "., aM \ 011c18 ° Q.`�— 1.12 r'l = lipM U n lla3doad>1000 'i B; Ow I®I®®415 09 6d 18)13ed F'" 0 N e i a a) z $ Zi " O = J a o 0 cuIMMO ap ? 'i Uellia ip NI ( W c a. /' = m y° ! g,& _ = 2 0i o O o =W W z ' as Cr) 13 W 0. a = 4IIIIII1 CU et ❑ z 3 CI 4,. W a !Q a co= a5CO I _1~ J _w 2 rt_ Q Q W W J ! z co c ! ❑ � a z a � N C•1 Q � O H I U) It. z ro "6 O W 0 h_„Fz o T Q w"� S,§ G ~ Z �it Z�o O W °"< w Q a Q. 2 ❑ Q 3 I 4 Z Z Lu ui N 1.1J w o w y K Z O) as LW to o Z Z aOQ IR*8m — a =a> � o mI CD U / UgipeA 4��� \ ooa iYL 6z Lz _s Q o \ ❑ ; id 4 1 N a J / W� J o o T U a I 0 I— `7 U � a �� m = LI W' O,-- c) / a — _ L W a LL A0EA4ct HERITAGE JRE Q � Rade.ol1 z\It____-/- J \ ; U Q /� 0 a a _J 1 1 I. I andw IF so 3/1213S3N VNIw21OV1 I a a I 1 id i,a U k'.YI i 01; kg Z.".6 „u w w m w r irwt erns mi w r i in+r. e cc mww+.m: w x \....C.) LOT 38,BLOCK B ) )` JI / \` 9•~•2 \NAPESJITG13 \ \ 6,PG ' NAPLES_ X2SG71C8pH 0 ASE,, / I +1 II i _- .------'-'7 LOT 39,BLOCK B II NAPLES HERITAGE I /' EIC. LAKE \ CCC PHASE TWO-A, 11-13 , II �� PB 28,PGS 1t-13 14, '\ k U iBi C/NROI S1555141 TRACT CC4B,NAPLES HERITAGE CCC TRACTS B C5 REPT, PB 27.PCS 98-100 \ \ I II Ii I \_ rygpLES BLOCK HERITAGE �` GCC PHASE TWO-A, P8 28, PGS 11-13 nuc a-[UNSFRVARM FRU - E EX.CONSERVATION /, II INAPLES NBAIAQ 0x RACTS B i — EASEMENT TO REMNN I+ NA a IERAT,PB 27,PGS 96-107 ------- / / LOT 5, BLOCK F, 1 + NAPLES HERITAGE GCC PHASE TWO-A, 3 s "NATURA AREA z 3 PB 28,PCS 11-13 I U m C I- 3D. I He 0 0 } -1.,.. il o U N U LOT 4, BLOCK F, •0 CD RTS ■' I J NAPLES HERITAGE C w GCC PHASE TWO-A, in� NRAC G PB 28,PGS 11-13 11 AREA ��ai�nlazrar Z `• o O IUIRE _1 LOT 3, BLOCK FNAPLES HERITAGE11' GCC PHASE iW0-A, _ I PB 28,PGS 17-13 I oiiii sn n' 11, \ N 30' I2LJ' t 1 Q 114 1115 A IN1101 �_ alZ R TRCTU =1' 140'r / 1"-' ■1 =✓ Tr ICER m NAPLES HERITAGE ;'I STORAGE k -- GCC PHASETWO-A. PB 28. PGS 11-13 _ �I COVERED PORCH o U ,n I o , s 7 7 C Ana^I:n: _ _L_ C "NATURAL AREA •5 ! C r LOT 1,BLOCK P Q \\\I> I NAPLES HERITAGE X GCC PHASE iW0 A, ® PB 28,PGS 11-3 � S CI R UI,NAREAG I Q ING Ili jj 111111111A. UNR Q 66' N y . _ 29.0' . . . • . 1 1 al 4-1 - • . • . . • - _ k TRACT C5-CONSERVATION AREA 4- • . _ - - - - - - NAPLES HERITAGE GCC PHASE 1, as . . _ . . . . . • • _ _ + . { PB 25, PGS 71-80 E - • - ` • - GOON SSR VATION`AREA ` ` ' - -•` � �a • • • • • . • • • _ • • • _ • • • • • + • y + + + • + - 'TRACT RW4- RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION NAPLES HERITAGE GCC - _ - • + . . • + • • PHASE 1,PB 26,PGS 71-80 "IN NO CASE SHALL THERE BE LESS THAN 50%OF THE NATIVE VEGETATION REMAINING. IF CLEARING RESULTS IN LESS THAN 50%OF RETAINED NATIVE VEGETATION,THEN SUPLLEMENTAL PLANTINGS SHALL BE REQUIRED TO ACHIEVE 50%OF THE ORIGINAL NATIVE VEGETATION. EXHIBIT "A-1 " NAPLES HERITAGE TENNIS CENTER CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN Packet Pg. 61 NO SCALE 9A2 .a 'Enhanced Type B Buffer: Twenty—five—foot—wide, 80 percent opaque U within one year landscape buffer including a hedge, which must be ?, made up of a minimum of ten gallon plants five feet in height, three feet in spread and spaced a maximum four feet on center at a planting; a mid—story tree or shrub spaced 15 feet on center and a U minimum seven feet in height at time of installation; and trees -a spaced no more than 25 feet on center and a minimum of 14 feet as in height at time of installation. R/w LINE o 25'RIGHT-OF-WAY 25'LANDSCAPE BUFFER i d a) —13'GUTTER TO R/W 191E ` VARIES 7.-20'PITO w IAHOSCARE BUFFER EASEMENT •` I CANOPY TREE,SPACED 25' = O.C., 14'HGT.AT PLANTING 0 v 2 to ( 4 z oa to f 10 GAL SHRUB, 5' IN HGT., QLo T 3' SPREAD, SPACED 4' 0.0. A t• EX. VALLEY GUTTER-N , 'd t p 4 a, D'+/ I �� o o� c E%.ROADWAY l' p f15 12.6'-13.1'-\ 2.6' 13.1', ao CA. .�\ a a Q C EX PAVEMENT 4 4:0 L 11.5' /- ���, 'a /i;. �; 1 MAX Y O il 1:3 Alertrill • \�\\ \ 1r\ AVE. EX. GRADE EL. 10.0' NAVD, o y/ / #7t.4'6624//‘`,\/\\ ,VARIES EL. 13.11-13.5'f/- v SLOPE TO NATURAL GRADE a. L VARIES 1')6-13.1 \"/ O />/A � ` v.�VX X // A 7,-- /. /\/ :15' 0.00RY 1'HGT./ATRPLBSPACED a_ ANTING 1 \ /�vA v\/�\k�\ vA�:v \\‘‘,<\:///::‹ ,,,,,\<\,,,<,..,\N, ��'v�' V � v N /\/ ' ',// / , /LAKE CONTROL EL 10.0' NGVD./\/ , /v/ /\/. v ,,// /, / y %V'/VA/V \;'y\.V v;!VA/V V'w //\,-//,‘\/ / '/\< a) _ / /,_'/ / / / / % K /, / ' / //// \, c/,\‘‘,, / \,,V .v N A/V\/v A/..Aiv . A/v\,A A/�\�,v. N A�V�V -- 0 f4 EXHIBIT "A-2" NAPLES HERITAGE TENNIS CENTER - a) TYPICAL 25' LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT ADJACENT TO COLONIAL COURT N.T.S. Q Packet Pg. 62 9.A 4 Turned r- : - Court Reporter U SECTION ONE: ca AMENDMENT TO PUT) DOCUMENT, SECTION L PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION, ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 95-74, NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF U AND COUNTRY CLUB PUD as �a •L SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION Z PROPERTY DESCRIPTION The North half(N'is) of the North half(N of Section 10,Township 50 South. Range 26 East, Collier County,Florida,less the easterly 100 feet thereof. is N AND L{7 ifhe Fast half(E %2) of Section 9,Township 50 South,Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida. >' CC EXCEPT the Southeast Quarter(SE'A<)of the Southeast Quarter(SE '/a)of the Southeast Quarter U (SE U)of Section 9,Township 50 South,Range 26 East, Collier County.Florida. 0 U ALSO EXCEPT the Southwest Quarter (SW 4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW `t) of the Southeast Quarter (SE ?/) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East., Collier County,Florida. U_ AND The Southerly 1.370 feet of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1't) of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida.lying southerly of Davis Boulevard (S.R 54). -a d AND a) m The Southeast quarter (SE '--.) less the southerly 1.370 feet of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 rust,Collier Count.Florida,l:-in southerly of Davis B ail card (S.R. 84). rn • - C) AND The North half(N U) of the West half U ; of the West half OF ? ) of the Southwest quarter (SW ",` of Section 3 Toe ship 5{0 South. I ar e 26 1-ast, Collip Counts, Flo:da. lying m southerly of Davis Boulevard(S-R. 54). U A NI) Formatted Font:(Default)Times Neva Roman,E Fit,Do no,ch ct soc',np or gamma! Page I of 6 C) Gems a,dariined arc added;words ew et-threa_i:are deletions E - 0 1 , Packet Pg. 63 Turned3iadby the Court Reporter 0 The East U.of the Southwest ti of the Southwest U of the Southeast U. Section 9. Township 50. Ranee 26 East.Collier County,Florida. 00 co 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION The f-58 563 acre project site is comprised of portions of Sections 3.4.9 Sc 10.Township 50 S. Range 26 E. The irregularly shaped development parcel abuts Davis Boulevard on the north and CR 951 on the east. The primary development objective is an 1$ hole (Is regulation golf course and country club, together with a maximum of 799 single and multiple family dwelling units. Maximum gross project density is 1.42r .1,42 units per '• acre. (11 1.6 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Cs1 Development of The Naples lIeritage Golf and Country Club will comply with the goals >, and objectives set forth in the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. 2 A. The subject property is within the Urban Mixed Use District/Urban Residential a Subdistrict as identified on the Future Land Use Map as set forth in Objective 1. C-) of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), and the uses contemplated are consistent therewith. cc B. The proposed density of Naples I-Jerhade Golf and Country Club is 1.U1.42 units per acre and less than the maximum density permitted by the FLUE Density CL Rating System is therefore consistent with the Future Land Use Element Policy 5.1. The entire subject property qualities for a base density of four units per aere. >, Certain pans of the subject property are further subject to density adjustments -cs including a proximity to Activirs Center density bonus. a) a) SECTION 11 PROJECT DEVELOPMENT a) •••-• 2.4 b1AXIMUFI PROJECT DENSITY a) C.) Formatted:Font:(Defalilt)T:rne!,Ne'o Carson,8 soDo not shook speling or gr-drnmE < Page 2 of 6 ',VErds T e 0,,,:lcrl; Packet Pg. 64 • Tu • he Cot m No more than 799 combined single and multiple family dwelling units shall be constructed in the 563 acre total project area. If all 799 dwelling units are constructed, gross project density will be 4,4=-2 1.42 units per acre. 0 CD SECTION III TRACT A as DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 0. as 3.2 USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land use, in whole or part,for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 0 1. Single family detached dwellings. 0 2. Single family attached dwellings, zero lot-line and patio dwellings and/or its 2 multi-family units. 3. An 18 hole golf course, clubhouses and related facilities, practice driving range. and golf course maintenance facility. These facilities will he substantially completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the 39r dwelling unit. 4C" U Recreation Area. Inheied RA on the.1ylasieit Pidn, which can include.iii,tst-is sm. .117)U:111 . courts. picklehall courts. bocce ball, indoor and outdoor fitness facilities, and pro shops. and other similar uses designed for use by all residents and mtists. Ci a) B. Accessory Uses: Q_ 1. Accessory uses and structures customary in pole course. single and cn multiple family residential projects. a) 2. Project sales and administrative offices, which may occur in a residential or recreational buiiclinc audior in the Country Club complex, and:or in a temporary building until such time as permanent structures arc available. a) 3. Model dwellings, in the single family lot are andior in the single family/ ca multiple famijy at durin2,the period of prf-iect.developmtm and salea. Formatted:roM:(Default)"Times New Roman;8 pt,Do not chael.saer1ng grammal < Pace 3 of 6 ajdeE words aft:deiorlsE Packet Pg. 65 TurnedsiA.by the Court Reporter U 0 Model dwellings shall he converted to permanent residents at the end of a U two year period unless otherwise specifically approved by the County. -o 4. Suns as permitted by the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at thetime permits are requested. 0 3.3 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS A maximum of 799 dwelling units may be constructed in this 563 acre project. a) 0. 3.6 MlN1MUM YARD REQUIREMENTS Tr- F_ Recreation area,labeled RA on the Master Plan cro Principal structures: 1�ront yard: 50 fee 17. .;� � �. . _�.- . � .�i.. ('' LC) Sid' ard: 25 feet _ Rear Yard: ,+ �,�,-=- Pr esen'e: 25 feet 2 C' s — 0 ns All pole lighting shall be limited to fiat panel flt,aures ^*- -- Formatted:Indent:Left: ',First Ilne: 0" 0- a) N ��l n t nil T}lt 5 h _Itch IO a) i .. C a) 0 Formatted;ton! (Default)Tim.- ,,;Lecis Leman,£ rgein o. a) Packet Pg. 66 • T i, , the Co ' _ .. _r 0 c z 0 U 3.11 REQUIRED BUFFERS c as Buffers shall be installed along the rear yard of multi-family sites or recreational facilities which abut off-site single family zoned or vacant agriculturally zoned lands. Buffers shall 0 separate the single family and multi-family development areas unless the necessity for 0 such buffers is waived due to a common architectural theme housing project. Buffers usco shall meet the criteria set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code.Buffering requirements may be met with existing natural vegetation,installed vegetation, structural 0 2 screening, or any combination thereof. Buffering plans shall be submitted to and co approved by the Collier County Development Services Director prior to issuance of a) a permits for the facility required to be buffered. m Z r ,. * .. * * * * * * cc ti Tr N SECTION VI in TRAFFIC REQUIREMENTS o N * * * * * ,: ,. ,< x it) O A ra 6.2 IMPRO`'EMENT REQUIREMENTS 2 0 ,, r .. Y r >. r r n. 0 U ife_i,,,;.- c?iet the--St i ii7�':=1t-�-�u`:-}-fe t r til'µ `�: 'rrcr._ e,f fn. ji1i1apl,.s ..+ �:----E-Nr3-ii ?.` ,: t..3v'c, P.ia ;.: t r,.. lis i-leiita= Geaf—li -Couirdt Cl a{r-it iect which ahu s-h-i suutii -,7.c of Scctioi9--o Tcwnshitt-50 S-lZanne 26—E will be r . c 41 ---public-thorcu hfa e co co z."- c,_ .. .. .. .. * *, r a > ms SECTION VIII �-' ,- WATER WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS a) m 6..N F 1.2 THE WA1 ER iVi-'NCGEMENT PLAN CONCEPT ar 354.1 acres of the 56 563 acre orolecl is planned as a store.water catchment basin. 66.7 vt acres of lakes and 91.9 aces of natural preserve area arc included in this area. .,- Storrnwater originating on lards to the north of the project‘‘ill floe, through the project by urine cuh eras. s1 ales. and pr served areas of the site in a manner intended to E duplicate p edetei o Ment conditions. raf4 Formatted:Font:(Default)'Omen Fee: +r Roman,t;pt,Do not c'neck spelling of gramma: Q c Paae 5 of 6 0 via is cedc r c:are e ,.orris. ;,1,or'. a c dc,orreos E t6 Q Packet Pg. 67 Tuhe Court Reporter U 0 Flood protection will be provided to the project by raising buildings, roads, etc. in U conformance with South Florida Water Management District criteria for building pad elevation is the 100-yr./zero-discharge storm elevation and the minimum road elevation is ca based on the 25 year stony event.After heavy rainfall events,surface waters stored in the catchment areas will be slowly discharged through small bleed down structures into the C7 existing preserved wetland slough. Off-site outfalls which receive stormwater discharge From the property will likely undergo modification in the future due to ;° fr development/modification, at which time modifications to the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club water management plan may be required. Z m R Exhibit"A",PCD Master Development Plan,of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. ti 95-74,is deleted in its entirety and is hereby replaced by the new Exhibit"A".PUD Master Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein. m 0 If) O fE 2 U U is Ca U • a .0 a> c 0) w a> w E a) a) 0 • Formatted:Fon[:{Default)T:rnas Paean ar,t p _'1.2 -h71;s,^,e i. cram-r. Z( :-1„eboI6 ..i r e_n ra'1 _ U Ct Packet Pg. 68 Tu ei.wly ihe Cot ' - I. -r c 0 c c NAPLES HERITAGE II i fl I 0 ' ,, t!Pnl‘.57 I I (A) z.=,:z ii i I li , ,,,s — , ..„c PHASE 1.PE GS,PCS 71-20 0 Ca 4-, -------- ,---- --- lts KS 81 0 a, — ____ _ . '' nP-2,,Irl cm NATURAL AREA AN PCS 71-B0 as 1Le •,.. I IAN -0 a) r .. I I •/ ---- ---,..-,._.> 1 I 11-- yr ,--- ..... , ,),, , 1 .. 1/ i .1 I 1 C',..%;,r1r1 ......,,,,.. a. ca , 1 , -± 0 Z 1 II PI4I I sv- PARCHING AREA I l r-- .ar , LOT 2.SCOUT NAPLES NENITACE hi ,, L ..!_____ i? (7____L____._ \ •,,,,_-..,, ,,,\\t,',VV'Z' ....- co NO SCALE I l.... C) 1‘ tl \ la \ t \ VIII, . 1 / Lo cr 1 _ cc ,\\ Kil ' 75 2',.,. . NAPLES HERITAGE a a ,\t.,\,..0 s ,, 7_7„.. , .i.1.1,11 \ Mill 1 / P 2 0 _____ , P„, \ o ••,,,,t ' 1 12 LOT 1 4 \ \ r___T, ir_pi n \.,,t :I, ,,,, n-N...., . , ,..-.:,., c------/------ ,,,,,,\\ , S HER TACS \ / (....) ..''r , T6.P.71-6o CC 1' \ \ \ .\ 11, \ \ -' ,-----1,\ \ , 11 .... I / • I C. N .,.._______.•'''\-----/ -----__-/ . t < li •,..,..------ , ____- -rn , "CS 1 I a) TACT CA-SANTE lists AREA C NAALE.54{,VAI4,27T_ZIALE 1. Cl) . . 0 . . a> I a_ . u) PRSAG=2,SONSERVATUN AREA , P :2'8 TRACT RYA-RIGHT-0---WAY -- — -J-, f trSONA110f.NAPLES HER TA:2-Ga) C5 PFOSE I.PP 2E.P,O_ ./ANA .2;A ..... ...., _ Cl, P NAPLES HERITAGE TENNIS CENTER c.., (13 — CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN — < NO SCALE ....; = a) ._. ....= C..) as ....., -,-. < Packet Pg. 69 Tu s. 15 • the Cor U O U .a 0 ca w 0 Type B Buffer: Fifteen-toot-wide, 80 percent opaque within one year landscape buffer six feet in height, which may Include C7 a wall, fence, hedge, berm or combination thereof, including trees spaced no more than 25 feet on center. P,fien planting a 0 hedge, It shall he a minimum of ten gallon plants five feet in height, three feet in spread and spaced a maximum four feet on center at planting. Wren a Type B buffer Is located within a residential PUD and adjacent to a lake, the required plant materials may be clustered to provide views. Clustered tree plantings shall not exceed 60 feet between clusters and the •+, clustered hedge plantings can be provided as a double row of shrubs that ore a minimum of 30 inches in height. When the I- adjacent lake exceeds 1,500 feet In width the hedge planting shall not be required. Wnen a community facility is located 0 within o residential PUD and abuts a residential unit, a Type B buffer shall be required. When a fence or wall Is used within the buffer a minimum of 50 percent of the trees and hedge plantings shall be located on the residential side of the fence or wall. (Q r4 R/W LINE 25'6081-OF-WAY 25'IMIDS0JB'E: r tD ti —13'0111111 To RAY UNE— WMFS Y-20'rfm N LANDSCAPE 6181021 EASEf1?7f CANOPY TREE,SPACED 25' Cisso of -O.C.,14'HGT.AT PLANTING N v a 14) as 17 10 GAL SHRUB,5'IN HOT., �o L 3'SPREAD,SPACED 4'O.C, A L4,� p Q EX. VALLEY GUTTER,-\ )u p LG U IX.ROADWAY L \ ) .�o EX, PAVEMENT r rI t,5f�_ S 1 / a — � � �� \ AVE EX. GRADE EL 10.0NAVO, ", A � ''' ` VAP,IES EL SLOPE TO NATURAL GRADE EL.VARIES I2.5-13.1'7',: �` A „ ,. \ � �.� 1,1D STORY TR /SHRUB SPACED \ �� \ ,/ 1� O.0 7 KITATPLANTING 1- N E NAPLES HERITAGE TENNIS CENTER TYPICAL 25` LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT ADJACENT TO COLONIAL COURT CD N.T.S. is 0 t4 r.+ Packet Pg. 70 9.A.5 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING CONLMISSION WILL MEET AT 900 ANL,NOVEMBER 17, 2016, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, THIRD FLOOR, 3299 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA: 0 NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 rts MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED 0 a) IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN CD ANY CASE, WRITI EN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE. CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. 0 z I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY 0 C.) 11'3 3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES 8 a) 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 20,2016 6. BCC REPORT-RECAPS 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT a) S. CONSENT AGENDA 0 9, ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: 0 a) 0 E 0 CCPacket Pg. 71 9.A.5 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 9:00 A_.M...NOVEMBER 17. 2016, IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM. ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, 0 COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, THIRD FLOOR, 3299 TAMIA.MI TRAIL EAST, NAPLES, FLORIDA: c z NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON U ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED 0 I IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL A MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN `° ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE APPROPRIATE COUNTY STAFF A z MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL aa)) MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR Z PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. N ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE CCPC WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND o THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE c� PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. z I. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE a 2. ROLL CALL BY SECRETARY U 3. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA L 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES a a) 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 20,2016 0 0 BCC6. CC REPORT-RECAPS U 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT m S. CONSENT AGENDA 0 9. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: U N a) !C) a) U f4 w a) U Packet Pg. 72 9.A.5 A. PUDZ-PL20150001416: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County. Florida amending Ordinance No.95-74,the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club E Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, the Collier County Land = Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the L', zoning classification of an additional 5.21.± acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to ' Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD; by revising the property description; by c adding a recreation area to Tract A; by revising development standards; by amending the U Master Plan; by adding a tennis center conceptual site plan and a landscape buffer exhibit; v and providing an effective date. The subject property, consisting of 563= acres, is located co south of Davis Boulevard and west of Collier Boulevard in Sections 3, 4, 9 And 10, o Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Eric Johnson, 0 AICP,CFM, Principal Planner] a, ar B. RZ-PL20i60001132: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier 'e County, Florida amending Ordinance No, 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land I Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the ai unincorporated area of Collier County. Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map m or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Z Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to the Residential Single Family (RSF-1) for property co located on the west side of Morgan Road, approximately 750 feet north of Sabal Palm Road in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting v of 5.7::t acres: and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Eric Johnson, AICP, CFM, ai Principal Planner.' 0 (NI C. PUDA-PL20140001836: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier r County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 86-19, commonly known as the Regency > Autohaus Planned Unit Development, by deleting provisions relating to restoration of o Z wetland site and allow offsite preservation of native vegetation to accommodate additional U parking on Tract D; by adding two access points on Hazel Road; by deleting outdated tl provisions; by adding deviations relating to offsite preserves, usable open space and KJ architectural standards_ by revising the Master Plan to reconfigure the wildlife and retentionra area and depict the parkiniwater management area; by deleting figures and attachments; by correcting acreage of the project from 14.6 acres to 15.44 acres and by providing an effective `' date. The property is located on the east side of Airport-Pulling Road, north of Hazel o • Road and south of Westview Drive in Section 1, Township 50 South. Range 25 East, t) Collier County. Florida, consisting of 15.44= acres. [Coordinator: Daniel J. Smith, AICP, Principal Planner] 0 0 0 D. PL20160001369: Commercial Excavation Permit and approval of off-site removal of up to 350.000 cubic yards Icy) of material associated with the Panther Island Mitigation Bank -a (P1MB) Expansion on property owned by the National Audubon Society. Inc.. located in 0 Sections 3 and 4, Township 47 South, Range 27 East. The properly is Zoned Agricultural U with a Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA) designation. The maximum depth of the o excavation is 31 with the intent to create additional wetlands on the subject property. Subiect 0 to the stipulations noted in the. Staff Report. [Coordinator: Matthew McLean, P.E.. rn Development Review., Division Director{ °1 10. NEV BUSINESS u) c m 11. OLD BUSINESS a U 12. PUBLIC COMMENT f4 Zi' I3. ADJORN CCPC A_enda[Ray Bellows/jinn °' C 0 asY , ::'-i : Packet Pg. 73 9.A.5 A. PUDZ-PL20150001416: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County. Florida amending Ordinance No. 95-74,the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the U zoning classification of an additional 5.21± acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD; by revising the property description; by adding a recreation area to Tract A; by revising development standards; by amending the U Master Plan; by adding a tennis center conceptual site plan and a landscape buffer exhibit; •a and providing an effective date. The subject property, consisting of 563= acres, is located south of Davis Boulevard and west of Collier Boulevard in Sections 3, 4, 9 And 10, Township 50 South, Ranee 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Eric Johnson, 0 AICP,CFM, Principal Planner] rn as • B. RZ-PL20160001132: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land 2 • Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the • unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map Q• or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Rural Agricultural (A) zoning district to the Residential Single Family (RSF-l) for property •• located on the west side of Morgan Road, approximately 750 feet north of Sabal Palm Road in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 5.7s acres: and by providing an effective date. [Coordinator: Eric Johnson, AICP, CF:M, Principal Plannerj ca 0 C. PUDA-PL20140001836: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier r� County, Florida amending Ordinance Number 86-19, commonly known as the Regency > Autohaus Planned Unit Development, by deleting provisions relating to restoration of wetland site and allow offsite preservation of native vegetation to accommodate additional parking on Tract D; by adding two access points on Hazel Road; by deleting outdated provisions; by adding deviations relating to offsite preserves, usable open space and architectural standards; by revising the Master Plan to reconfigure the wildlife and retention area and depict the parking water management area; by deleting figures and attachments; by correcting acreage of the project from 14.6 acres to 15.44 acres and by providing an effective date. The property is located on the east side of Airport-Pulling Road, north of Hazel o o. Road and south of Westview Drive in Section 1, Township 50 South. Range 2.5 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 15.44= acres. [Coordinator: Daniel J. Smith, AICP, Principal Planner] 0 U D. PL20160001369: Commercial Excavation Permit and approval of off-site removal of up to 350.000 cubic yards (cy) of material associated with the Panther Island Mitigation Bank (PIMB) Expansion on property owned by the National Audubon Society, Inc., located in v Sections 3 and 4, Township 47 South Range 27 East. The property is Zoned Agricultural with a Natural Resource Protection Area (NRPA) designation. The maximum depth of the excavation is 3' with the intent to create additional wetlands on the subject property. Subject U to the stipulations noted in the Start Report. [Coordinator: Matthew McLean, P.E., Development Review Division Director] 0. NEW BUSINESS .r H. OLD BUSINESS 12. PUBLIC COMMENT 13. ADJORN CCPC Agenda/Ray Bellosys-jmp s U ' • Packet Pg. 74 saldeN : 9LVZ) (91.0Z L6 AoN) 3d33 le.i93JodeJ Uano3 Aq pa;oallo3 swell -5;uewg3efy :;uawgoe};y �n Ir Z ~ Q o 0 0 0 l a C) NC Q O N Q. i OCD NO N ..,cb O to �- N Q, o ry o o 0 N O O cO 0 L' ,a, N N n N o •0Al2 8911100-1. 46 Li O O e N o. CD N to W I o it a O -/) / \ ! I,` ig J ¢ i CO i CC // / E 1./ w W o • ILI Z F Cn / / -1 U Z 4 Q g O Cr 0 = i/ U �I u < 'W ¢ z o C_9 j �� // a V/ J LT, Z ag z5 Li O i ~ // � � W O ),, F„J coo iH' i V w 5 w 5' i QW J wx5o in O w f ,'----�� l�'� cc22 2a�, �mca N a ,r/ >X Cc- a �.o: CD 28322 ° l j! a I a a GW Q �C, w w w En tai cc C 4'S m Z O Z O O N o �� ,� \`.,, 0 05< < u. Q Q w o 1 2 Z N '_-� 1,-- Lu W »Jgip, z d OWuZ,,, 0 »>a m �\\a\\,., . \ Q 5 .- _ Q _ O nI UJ LU 2 Y /r\ ) I I a , � p 3- , E t7 a s �� a Hyo U y , ' `� / I— () / / a = 0 Jf ` I " � n O d )� L ti �i LU a. tu / / r„ r . ', lc .,. S:; o � g' a 'd lg=1 , J `c7 0 1 Q 8 til EI Z U Ig I -: J ' L U a `` /a Z ,^.Ii c j / i a_ O _ w �I a , 0 '. i t Q a s ig b& I 1 0 './. F--a: \c �J B I LI /it CO z �'''. v mg.) 4:C w v; n \ \ o n W tea i a o _J W �a J 7 W D C.D W H - \ a' ems CV 6L Jo andel 1 SIA LU �/ g U; Al2#3cl0Lld NOOK � K.1' �. �' _� < '� o -� „ « z LDa seldeN : 9LbZ) (940Z 14 AoN) 3d33;e JapodaN pnoo ICq pa;oalloo swell - g;uewgoe;;y :;uawgoe;;y Q & co S ; csj x. Zag Q o a N W g 088 1.6 cr .. a Z 1lit " W wo c J 0 G W Q. -/-/--- & H "� ° pop w I = o - Scr r U J � 0 1 x ii 0W \_/ z ' cc v z Cn 73 w QCs) o Z nOc� 0 W m on C�S � cn >_ QC — LJ 0w C J O O z 0 1 Q Q 0 Ch 4 Z a s N O CC H I CO Li. Z oew r :" '�� = O Cl) I .,,-s,, r J E-- Z ''. LU LL! ¢ Z- O zw Cf) OQ ,' 1 G z 5 > 'J' -' LU G 0 5F W W Lit a Cl) >� rw' LU o Z0 Jao — =_ -- Et ,� z>> w` ' / �— a _ 1 -- v < b w / -- p o a. I yl J r ,\ l,\ •� \\-� W w Q u_ C n 1 W t U �� — ifJ 1. U ✓ i I 3A83S3I VNIIN2:1OV1 I 1 1^IF, F- ,<<<,<-'1,,.-; ,<<< € 9.A.5 U I ca O Ennanced Type B Buffer: Twenty—five—foot—wide, 80 percent opaque 0 within one year landscape buffer including a hedge, which must be as made up of a minimum of ten gallon plants five feet in height, three •- feet in spread and spaced a maximum four feet on center at z planting; a mid—story tree or shrub spaced 15 feet on center and a 0 minimum seven feet in height at time of installation; and trees a) spared no more than 25 feet on center and a minimum of 14 feet a ca in height at time of installation. z ([ R j W LINE co r_...._.____..—. 25'RIGHT-OF-WAY 25'LWDSCN'E BUFFER- h d' N I I V R16 7'-20'INTO — --13'GUTTER TO VW LINE--r- 'LANDSS BUFFER EASEMENT I 471.- CANOPY DCANOPY TREE,SPACED 25' c / 1O.C.,14'HOT.AT PLANTING N PG > �\d 1 Z �7 1 U 10 GAL SHRUB,5' IN HO', -v -?:a, 3' SPREAD, SPACED 4'O.C. �cr� U EX. VALLEY GUTTERm, a i\� c � \ a iD /aY pr,..., I3f ‹v,---7, J Q C r 0 26' 13_'' ��� �°�� �Q 0 E? PAVEMENT ti cL 11`,, /- �� Q CC ti i .., �,r (\ ,,,,--AVEE? G. ADE EL. 10.0 NAND, .L� , / - \ VARIES JARI SGEL J1 \ � M!L` PY T? i NATURAL GRADE V tE HUG SPACED > / : \w /. 5 O.C., 7'HC' AT PLANTING -a N `,LAK_ C.01\IROL L. 10.0 N c.) a) 00 to EXHIBIT "A-2" NAPLES HERITAGE TENNIS CENTER w TYPICAL 25' LANDSCAPE BUFFER EASEMENT ADJACENT TO COLONIAL COURT a, N.T.S. U ca r Y E 0 w Q Packet Pg.77 9.A.5 , . . r_OE 35 KOCK E / r 1 \ „,""\; / .3 NiAP:',-3 HEPI3A1213 /1, Usi /11 ,' K./ \ GEO PHASE 1013-A, / IPA:El C4 - PiCHE- -w,e /1 ; \PE 29 PCS 11-13 / • PECPA PON'.1,'•'" CRITPCE , , \ \\ BOCK '13' Ht......i. -, .,,,.':,;5 ,,,,,, , • • \ ' SL TWO—A 1 ,, \ I ,. • 0 \ ,,,,, N NAPLES PIERCFACE 1,.. K., 11-.. CCC Pith SE ,Wc,-A. i II h, I .,,7. ...-:._.7_,,..,'".-' \ ‘,.. . .,, _,Z !---.1.. N , N. EX LAKE = „,., •..., NN., :1 \ ':', r . k i I 0 ,,,,....,R1sTR,,K7.,),„ 'RAC CCB CC6B, NAPLES HER1TAGE GCC TRACet 5 5 Ct..REPLA 7- 's \ \ \. ,,.. P..„, _- H....„........., , .. 27,PCS 5E-100 , ' ---__ -------,____Jj ii . C : _ LL1* 5.BLOCK r1 NAPLES HER,TAGE '1"----111..•...„ 1111-111-1-3-11-1,11-:11-111.-11-11--------- '1 _- ' 11 20.31 C9-CaiSERvAllur AKA -----,,j ,, : GCC.4 ASE TWO-h, PF, WTCAAIL:EA,M.Ef-CM7KKAP':-A.`..F.,.,I,.,.-„"-----.....,',,,I„..,N‘I',,)I L'1'-------"---`•--„,,...,.. ---___- /;,. -11-1-11-112-1E A — —P9 / /1 ‘(••..0•0. .=0. _ 0) , ..--.- .4.-. ‘41-1' u III 17,,,, l : 1 LOT 5 BLOCK r NAPLES HER,TASE .. 1.. GCC PHASE ,C.-A CD 5525, 525 1,--1.5 2 I 1 i ' '! 0. NATURA_AREA ii-4 ! 1.-- ea \, L- ry ,--.--. 1 '95 4— --.„,. : '-i"• . --), •• _ . \ 47:4 : C CD 4D, BOCK P, .1 : \`‘'\\-- ; 3, i 1';2; 1 rKK NAPLES BERITA3E ; 1 I 1-1I-------7 'i ;\ , ,,,, , I!,..,,, et '.=-7- ErC,C. PHASE Tv..0-1, --- I. '5 28 P:35 11-1, 04 --:-..,.-f—f- . 1 ,: 1)#;, ( --. _ 2,'",‘Ir.1; ..--.. ,---: ::1 > ...—. : :[•,--—. .r. • •, : ,, , I , :' [ :, I': .1 [ 1;''';414:” [ ' , ' , : • •i____,---:,, ,: I , r — 0 -; LIII 7----- -'• 1, !',, :_0”, 3, BLOC,F r•••• LI-------- 1 ' 1 ift—=- i I \NI . , NAPLES 1-,ER,T AGE 't C.C.P PHASE 1vv0-K. /- r-RI •3_,,,p.,....,,,PP 2E, POS 11-13 > I . '\ ___----4 ,,7_,--- -‘ li I 175-T---.°1P-7 ,--- ----7. , ” , ' : , 1 :L_F! ----- , • i j!-___ C ", ; " : 0 K.-,-4--1-r; L, /"P-----,7-1111K Pr, r , '1•1 v.=',7:---` I -' ! ‘ ,),/ .._, CZ ---- -. CT 2,ra,.00, h.. 25 PCS 1,-13 0 C) ::-).1 ' :' N______—:)N Q-------_-_,---1; 'N , , r',.2,..,• - \ -,------,,,- , Sc i P5 25 ,CS ,-'3 , 3 i . 73 . , 0 .".---. , 0 (f) ...., ... Lc) .,.., . . . . _ , . • . . . .. . . . . _ . . . . „..... f..) cts ..,, •• 4., = cts .1., .1. Packet Pg. 78 9.A.5 , LOT 28. 2-0CP 8 ' // // „,‘/\//' A /5Sieele1...P.SAsHL R ,,,.GE // 842:7 CCP RICB8--" -WA9 / 5 PS 2E PCS 11-13 e PESEP V 71CN N PP 7" .C21TAC" e' ...ame.. , , = ,';'/ ,' LCc 3P.BLOCK 8 0 .. „/ 7/ NAP-ES HERO-AGE !, ,, I '' ' 7 ."5" V/ OCC PBP 55 TA725-A, 75 5.. ' ./,''' .7 z 5 N PE 28 N ' 11 ' C e / ..!/ ,,,,, A i 1 i '' ' , I, , = ,..,. ' : : ' N5 „ I I' A ! o , ,, 0 -,_ I • AMR COMA S7827.18F5 7RACT CC42.NAP'-ES NE.P11ACE .„ GCC 7PINC75.El KP 5.5 28PLE21 :5„, -5. ' :1 Ii ' 'a .,,._ 77', 27.PCS SE-1DC 1 ' . -----h-if E 1 LOT 5 BLOCK ' : I, , i NAPLE8 'SE"SAGS 1 i 77 55-2, -, 1 :' : E.KCC P5 ASE'WC-4. ••". ^---... : , 51E51 -al1I.1.915555N ARP!7'777--- „ a 2E, PCS.1-13 o 19:PLEL MENU:IF.zr.FACE B e 1 ii q 0 rk,1"),2.5-810P5290,118t,e9E „., , , 55-2, AV , e: 1 L5 VIAL 51.1'12 PO14E-100 ,1 NAPT,HE',1Wil.C"..--1.7.4517,13 0 _ / ! II ! 7,297LA7 49:2 4530-185 il _2_2-2_2-2.2-2-2. 1175 "' CD -- - .2 27., ,V:, mr-• ', , ,i '..",';' . 1-05 5, 2102K l. •./ •- a) PB 28 PCS 1-13 I , - ai 51,8.181.0 0A'A Z '95 P' — .75,572.--2 Ii 54 11 .. 1,- !--,3'C CD _:::_________, , E'LOCK F, ic.• NAPLES HER:175S8 V. P--- , \<\\•7:\ - --1.75.' ' 'NE: CCC BBASE T9AC-A B5-1-1 C•I :i-, \ 'll ,5..55---- , — ! 5-7 FE1 28, ••••••• iFL. 1.'•I'''''1"-]1-1"' `A--2-7—,7) ,7,.,, ........ T 7 co .',...,',10,,IsIF4', i ' r It ., ..... , : ,-.. ----. dui:. II;,,,; 1- .,l- 1 II '* I 0 L._ 4 , ,i II --- 0,1 , ,, , ,, 01 •!,, , 1 , ,•-•---- '',, .7.-Z .9,..C,Cr., N- I lleCC 515,5"2 : ll NL.,155. PE 2E PCS 11-13 > - ' C.) 4----- , 4 t , -1 ,. :,-3L-;c-- V : -T., II , i ..-- () , , , , , 0 ,.... /,1 - :.,: '-''----I , , ,I •. ,, .r..._ . , -4,4 ,--;..-,, ,I., I lee55 PEACE ilii 2-A. 9., 3e. 1BE 28 „. 2.. : F-1'42 . ,, ,, '..: . -APSB Y., 5/ -0 0,2! ------P-c7-5(/' - 1'1:: : 5-,,!:1 1 17 1,2+102,' = 0 \A 1 1Pe E598 11 ' I5APLES NERICAACE ' 172 i ' 0 - .------:-.1 i - - ,,, .,,, , - . AB 25 PCP 11-'2 ' >. ' O' CD , : ...... . . . - . ,•,_... _ 0 4 i - - -- CU ' ' I•., , , , ___---- = 0 • \ ' , ,,,;_____-- , 0 -, / !- E . ...., - - - ---. N'.-- -- _ __ 0 Lo = -,,,,,0,_ .7,,,,,,,.-.-.,,,,-. ,-,•:-:,:, a) E 0 • •• '- - - - ---,-.----;,-'525:7•EP 27:7,1'.1,-,:e::, ' — ' ' - - - - . ....., p,LsE , r--E 2E. 7112 7"--51-e c.) cc .,.., ..... _ _ Packet Pg. 79 0. 9.A.5 row 9 50 s Naple Heritage Golf and Country Club RANGE: 26 E U r.6+3� d ,�` 'tea:. - _� R k'ru!-:•`.-4`."Y51',`'.4•^',.'"'7� "` a s �° �'"'" xpd. qlf° ` Y9 Y - �� 41 O , 1 1, 3 ., r il , : �� '� ; 0 600 1200 * • fl tr - ` t � ` SCALE ...{ ry 4. yq.as�i ` . ..y ,d" 9 3 s, .-...7--.....--:„..,.....,0 94 1 t.: �, '�' . (cn 6 �� �` gi• -NV �1 ,4 a ' .�i ,, Cyd i� 0 4� wsa" i t a ax 'ii y . Y r „ j WMA ' t '� N cNI },�` _.,'":-'-e- �.�/`. Jim " v t J '1..—_,-,-..4-e.,, "�� ,1---- �. 0. o '8i `°d3 .,s" ► " '.„,---,s.4,-, ,ay .„ d"s.y ``:L ?-cY +L; i I` 4 `� --- -, and. �. o . �` -tio fa * n , rya ,k' _ vs-..-.CAtty _ o r .6•t k �`V g x� CD .;.-_,-,,,,-- .0..it --,- i >< ti -� 1 '1k ,�� ��4���':r7Y.+ +lw ".' ' ,yam" y'� - o ¢*yam" ,,t,:-.* �p ,�- ; ." >. ,— F�.-+r*`„i F ira .',- ,,,� .�a ',...�,.r„ �'3.. 'c ""'^s.a ' r 3 R n • N il � It. 4 �ti -----Ax i X11 Peru 17a Z - ` Yf 1 q 1iiiggg ! yS �}t„ �,.�' ,, k - s' i + s._ AN. • kx �� .:y U.. 0_ ,:i.z„...,.., ....,....,1,:,,„.t-,.....'--0..--,;.*-, '. .'''',7,;.',,i!i„,kik''..' � r � r< ft- ,h,r 1s � � �`A`°.{ 0. -, -` -- .."1 .;(2.1,ik,''',-1-,,-...!,,v-i ;Irk, -:, -_,,,i- . �a$.�e ss z5 x7 { fL 48 ...wpt.., + `'" + '<, c byµ d 3 i r �' Mt '{ 0 Y # " a r.+ N ,...., 4 * � e r g� tr a taa1 T' 4 -.-...,,,..,-, -4.-.: S �- - toof .1 'ww. �" r �.�, :...''' ,..,t1,-,,,I,;,,,,...ct •:a-�`: ,„....c.,„?. k 's F ,..'.7-. ..'yP� ,^� s V. k„..4:'1.1..- v + 440 U .„ier . „,. __ f4 w Q Nates: C 1. Property baunda'y is approximate and obtained from Collier County Property Appraiser's Website. March 02, 2012 22438 V PLRAl/T USS' ONLY, NOT FOR C01i STRUCTfON g' P m T Drowin NHGIPLANeDURTs.DWG +- 4 W. DE'X7'ER REIV.DER Proposed Relocation mosso cry Z'E 5, INC. and itl ati©n rens ENVRON�f�hT.4L c .ff4P.lh'E COArSULTI.hr6' FOR?'.DYERS 23�-334-3680 x Packet Pg. 80 9.A.5 RICHARD M. ROGAN 7703 NAPLES HERITAGE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 0 0 October 26, 2016 ,a) To: Members of the Collier County Planning Commission Members of the Collier County County Board of Commissioners Re: Naples Heritage Golf & Country Club Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) •• Proposed Tennis Center HM File No.: 2015.055 (70 The above referenced item was to be on the Board of Commissioners agenda for October 11, 2016 but was sent back to the Planning Commission for further review of its > unanimous favorable recommendation. Presumably this action was in response to 0 letters written by three residents of Naples Heritage Golf & Country (NHGCC) objecting to the relocation of the community's main tennis courts. While they raise a number of valid concerns, which have been addressed, it is also apparent that a great deal of perspective has been lost since the original plan was presented at to the Planning Commission meeting held on May 5, 2016. Of particular concern are the interests of the 464 NHGCC homeowners who have voted to approve a club expansion project of which the tennis court relocation is a part. tI am a former President of the NHGCC Board of Trustees and, in 2015, served as the Chair of the Long Range Planning Committee which was responsible for developing the Campus Expansion Plan. I am also past president of the Cypress Pointe Homeowners Association; the single-family neighborhood within Naples Heritage consisting of 101 a homes, six of which are located on Colonial Court and face the site slated to house new tennis courts. I live within five homes of the site under consideration. In 2004 the NHGCC Board of Trustees was approached by a developer who was planning to build some 140 multi-family units on several pieces of property adjacent to Colonial Court. The proposal contemplated providing access to these units through the Naples Heritage main entrance off of Davis Boulevard, down Naples Heritage Drive and "a though Colonial Court. It was the judgement of the Board that the proposal offered no significant advantages to current residents and, in deed, would place added strain on the community resources already in place. Subsequent to turning down the proposal, the owner of one adjacent five-acre parcel offered to sell it to NHGCC. In light of Packet Pg. 81 9.A.5 everything that had taken place, it made sense to go ahead and make the purchase, which was approved in September, 2004. w As is documented in the minutes of the Board of Trustees, as early as February, 2005, o discussions concerning potential uses of the newly acquired property were begun. In the intervening years a number conversations were held about possible uses of this site CSJ as well as other sites within the NHGCC PUD. A frequently discussed prospect was the o movement of the Club's main tennis courts to a site near the driving range which is dedicated preserve. On several occasions inquiries made of the Corps of Engineers (COE) resulted in strong admonitions about attempting to convert property already designated as preserve; this regardless of any offers to swap other land. Then, in July, 2014 the COE demonstrated its resolve by refusing to issue a permit to Quail West Country Club to convert dedicated preserve for use as tennis courts; a situation identical to ours. We concluded that going forward with an identical proposal was not likely to •• succeed. Taking the COE to court would not only be futile, but also expensive. The suggestion has been made that there has not been a good faith effort to find alternative sites for the tennis courts. The fact is that no fewer than 16 alternative sites were evaluated and documented in an Alternatives Analysis submitted as part of our application to the Corps of Engineers. The analysis, which goes on for 24 pages, o reduces the practical sites to 3. They are the five-acre site adjacent to Colonial Court, the site near the driving range (discussed above) and a site west of the existing club Q house parking lot, a portion of which would be used for additional parking spaces. When these three sites are subjected to further analysis, the five-acre site comes out as s being the least environmentally damaging. With respect to wildlife, all three sites contain no known listed species. As to loss of wetlands, development on the five-acre �. site is rated as the least damaging by a factor of over three times when compared to the driving range site and by a factor of 1.25 times when compared to the site west of the existing parking lot. I am not sure exactly how one would go about defining a "good faith effort," but i am sure that what was done qualifies under any rational definition. When NHGCC was planned in 1996, the Collier County Land Development Code dictated that only 185 parking spaces were required at the Clubhouse. Since then, the o demographics of the residents have changed increasing the activity and usage of club facilities. Predictably, problems caused by the lack of parking are magnified during a, season and when Naples Heritage hosts events open to members and their guests as well as when inter-club events take place. The lack of space often leads to overflow parking along nearby roadways and other areas. This creates an unsafe condition for residents and complicates access for emergency vehicles. As far back as 2012, both the Club's insurance carrier and the East Naples Fire District have served notice that parking available to support the main Clubhouse area was inadequate. The plan under Page 2 Packet Pg. 82 9.A.5 consideration adds 66 parking spaces, an increase of 35%. To suggest that this is not a problem is is to demonstrate total disinterest in the welfare of the community. 3 In addition to responding to a growing problem with parking, the planned expansion '8 addresses the increasing interest in health and wellness by including a new fitness center and an enlarged main pool. Finally some modification to the clubhouse are -0 being made to accommodate additional activities. e .._ T) In March, 2015, the NHGCC Long Range Planning Committee was charged with the o CD responsibility of developing a plan that would positively impact as many residents of the cm a 799 homes as possible and to do so in a cost effective manner. Between April and ._ October a plan was crafted following a broad-based examination of what other i In comparable clubs and newer communities were offering their residents. Between early 0 'a October and mid-November, 22 neighborhood meetings were conducted to present the a z initial concept and to gain input that was used to make modifications. Between January CD and early February, 2016 three town hall meetings were held to present a mostly N. Tr c., finished plan and to gather additional feedback. Approximately 1,000 people attended the small group and town hall meetings. It is inconceivable to suggest that there was a ; insufficient notice given to the community. N. > As a side note, one of the 22 meetings was actually a presentation made to the NHGCC 0 z Tennis Association annual dinner. If, as mentioned in one of the complaining c.) correspondence, "many of the tennis players . . . were opposed to locating the tennis cl_ c.) facility as proposed. . .," it was not at all evident at the meeting. In fact there was some 0 .- concern about having spent a considerable sum to upgrade the existing tennis courts, to RI address safety concerns, just two years ago (at that time). Otherwise the overwhelming sentiment was favorable. They would finally have a facility worthy of hosting inter club a a, competitions. But, since there is no objective data supporting either position, I suppose i= •e we are left with dueling anecdotes. = 0 c.) On March 25, 2016 the results of a community-wide vote were published. 464 >, s2 households voted yes. NHGCC documents require that a project like this must receive -0 2. one more than 50% "yes" votes to be approved. Non-votes are counted as "no" votes. a c, Against this stringent standard the project was approved by 58% of the 799 70- 0 homeowners. Many other clubs require only that a majority of those voting is necessary U) for approval. Against that standard the project was approved by 64.7%. Within NHGCC a there are 9 voting districts based on type of home; single family, terraces, verandas and u., vilia.s. When the 464 votes are broken down by voting district, every single district, '8 including the one composed of the single family homes, voted in favor of the project. ? The point here is that the Board of Trustees has the responsibility to serve the membership at large invariably leaving some individuals dissatisfied. Nonetheless, the a residents in 464 homes have a legitimate expectation that this project will go forward as '8 Page 3 a a :i Packet Pg. 83 9.A.5 has been presented to them. After all, their approval included a commitment to fund the project. One or more of the complaints made some reference to the impact on resale value of • in 0 the homes on Colonial Court. Keeping g pace with the marketplace begins with the community. Prospective buyers are not even going to look at individual homes if the community does not offer the features and amenities that they require. There are 799 homes a NHGCC that all suffer if we cannot keep pace with other communities. As you are aware from the written exchanges with the residents of Colonial Court, their concerns have been more than adequately addressed. Giving appropriate consideration to the wishes of the community at large is well overdue. I urge you to conclude your review and to move on. Thank you for your consideration. ti Sincerely, f� r; /f r /; t ` � Richard M. Rogan 0 0 U 0. C. ctL a 0 m t 0 U .0 m c: as 0 U E a) m 0 t4 a7 v as Page 4 Packet Pg. 84 9.A.5 Tel: 239-775-7413 Trevor J. Brown 8016 Kilkenny Way Naples, FL 34112 November 8, 2016 E m Collier County Facilities Management Department v 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101 Naples, FL 34112-5356. o U Attention -Eric L. Johnson 73Cti w 0 Re -Amending Ordinance No.95-74 0 a) rn I am a resident of Naples Heritage GCC but will not be able to attend the meeting on November 17,2016 w CB due to another commitment = u) a) My concern is that the matter at hand is not being handled in the best possible way. The conditions are ct being set-up to ensure that one or two parties are going to be unhappy. I'm not sure my comments z should be discussed at the meeting but I would like you to determine if my idea has merit to N I would like to see all the involved parties sit down at a table and discuss an idea that could possibly make everyone happy. N For example I think that there is another site available for the new tennis courts that would be better for > ° the environment. This site is in an area that is not in a water-shed area and has a substantial buffer to z any residential property. This site is the area adjoining the Prestwick Swimming Pool and Tennis Court a is far removed from the nearest road drain. U U 75 NHGCC could probably be persuaded to change the zoning of the south 5 acres from Agricultural to 1' Preserve. Far fewer trees would have to be removed but more "fill"would be required to bring the site a up to grade. 0 Army Corp of Engineers would he happy that the area chosen is not a water-shed. 0 Tennis Players would be happy with a better location and no residents would be inconvenienced. 0 w U m Speeding traffic to the south 5 acre site is a problem that would not get worse. o U Access for Emergency Vehicles to the new site would be much quicker. 2 The environment would be the least harmed and Collier County would be pleased with the increased w property values. a) Choosing this new site is not without precedent Almost similar conditions were approved for o Countryside Golf and Country Club. :;:".t 8 Sincerely, P --7/ w i_7; ,/f y Trevor J. Brown ( M.I. Mech.E.,Chartered. Eng.) E-Mail: trevor8016@centurylinknet Packet Pg. 85 9.A.5 10. , .) ef rt; i tine ° €l i i )-t" 7ir-=-.•'-v-_,-..,:fq:' —. ,-=z,z-",,:--,-; -:' ,.:5--,-,-t-::: '7=`;'1.:;::-'4-:f173,--,4 L �'-'5'-"* U %. November 2004 ii, -47.;:g;� .- tom. � .s C 4 41% Cti 4- Master Board ok $200 dues increase; ,, .. golf course renovation goes to members �. eeting Tuesday,Oct. 19,2004, Resurfacing all greens with Champions Li,c-ar `ct, s n. 'g the Naples Heritage Master grass,an ultra dwarf Bermuda grass being n r z �� 4. Association Board of Trustees widely used in Southwest Florida (all Lely , i Gari t l CD y voted to accept the Finance courses,Bonita Bay courses,Naples land parcel d �':Committee budget recommen- National, etc.). cv dations for fiscal 2005.The budget projects At the Sept.21,2004 ca E Overhaul of irrigation system, replacing meeting of the Naples r revenue of$2.856,000,operating expenses existingHeritage Trustees,the N of$2,301,(}00 and $567,000 for reserves, hardware with Toro controls and gt irrigation heads. Board voted to authorize r deprecia ..n and capital expenditures.The President Phil Piessinger > result is e $200 per year increase in Master Leveling of all tee bores,enlarging of to pursue negotiations on z Association dues,or$2,900 for each Naples selected tee boxes. - . an adjacent parcel of land v Heritage residence.Some of the increased that recently came on the a xtending cart paths (combination of market.The Club now has operate -,al costs are in anticipation of a golf b . concrete and cochina)throughout. an agreement to acquire »-. course i F ovation project which must be approximately 5 acres of approve_, i-...),the membership. E Enlarging existing practice area. land behind our fifth w L C ee a green,accessible via The ren -ommitttee budget recommen- Renourishment of sand traps. c j Colonial Court.Plessinger '' dations ails anticipate the completion of the Contingency of$50,000. said the parcel is -t purcl�a5e five acres of adjacent land landlocked and,if = behind t :-i th green and accessible via Marlowe explained that the existing Tif possessed by another U Colonial Court.The budget does not include Dwarf greens have a common lifespan of party with development the cost of the front nine toilet facility under seven to 10 years and would be due for plans,it is likely that we -a construction.That.is expected to trigger a replacement soon.The new Champions ultra would be forced to grant °7 separate assessment of approximately$100 dwarf turfgrass provides a superior playing public access through our w .,_ property.The Board of o [DPI-_[DPI-unit t cove:-related capital costs. surfacep and very strong root structure which j Trustees A +o U has no immediate Golf co F"S_ renovation will last much longer.Champions is the only plans for this land but E E new turfgrass which can successfully be wanted to protect the d A series c;; oit"course renovations had been grown using a no-till method.The cost is a community now and included :r. a $5 million Long Range Plan- fraction of the expense of the surface provide for our own needsLq Hing proposal that the membership voted rebuilding required for other ultra dwarf in the future.The$205,000 down in chotPmber.The golf course pro- grasses. required for the purchase E of this parcel will come posal trial f e Board is sending to the rn a n totals ^7Q7 n The Board of Trustees unanimously ap- from reserve funds andcis mea a:b rsi,ice tota�s �,.,,900 or approxi proved the Green Committee proposal and will not require a special <t mately$1,000 per residence. agreed to send it to the membership.Due to assessment of the v e Green Committee Chairman Bill Marlowe be mailed in late October, ballots will be members a� detailed the p,raposa!for the Board of counted at a membership meeting called for o Trustees at their October meeting.Some of that purpose on Tuesday, Nov.23,2004. Ifca the-estimates were generated for the approved,the golf course would be closed previous Clubhouse golf course renovation at the end of April,2005 and would reopen pr oposai b'_;t were updated for the current j in September. proposal. Highlights include: I � Packet Pg. 86 9.A.5 SECTION ONE: z AMENDMENT TO PUD DOCUMENT, SECTION I, PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION, ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 95-74, NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB PUD SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION to PROPERTY DESCRIPTION a The North half(N 'iz) of the North half(N '/z) of Section 10, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, CD Collier County, Florida, less the easterly 100 feet thereof. AND The East half(E '/z) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. EXCEPT the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. a. ALSO EXCEPT the Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4) of the Southwest Quarter (SW 1) of the Southeast Quarter (SE 1/4) of Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. 0. ce AND 0 U The Southerly 1,370 feet of the Southeast Quarter (SE >a) of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, lying southerly of Davis Boulevard (S.R. 84). U AND ° U The Southeast quarter (SE 1/4) less the southerly 1,370 feet of Section 4, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, lying southerly of Davis Boulevard (S.R. 84). AND The North half(N 'h) of the West half(W / ) of the West half(W `i ) of the Southwest quarter (SW ;/) of Section 3, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County. Florida, lying southerly of Davis Boulevard (S.R. 84). 0 CC Page 1 of 6 Words underlined are addedwords sts c4 4h—reu !1 are deletions sers.ashton_h'o\ppDaa oea:A',4ia esoft_` 'indavv°GTemporary Internet Files sConten..alt lOOk,5MviIUSZQB\Naples Heritage PUDA-PL-20150000416 (10-11-2016).docx Packet Pg. 87 9.A.5 AND 0 The East '/ of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast '/G, Section 9, Township 50, , Ranee 26 East, Collier County, Florida. 10 * X * * * X Y * X X JCC * U 1.4 GENERAL DESCRIPTION c.D The 5-5-8, 563 acre project site is comprised of portions of Sections 3. 4, 9 & 10, Township 50 S, Range 26 E. The irregularly shaped development parcel abuts Davis Boulevard on the north and CR 951 on the east. The primary development objective is an 18 hole regulation golf course and country club, together with a maximum of 799 single and multiple family dwelling units. Maximum gross project density is 1.43 1.42 units per acre. ti 1.6 STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE N Development of The Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club will comply with the goals o and objectives set forth in the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. U d A. The subject property is within the Urban Mixed Use District/Urban Residential e Subdistrict as identified on the Future Land Use Map as set forth in Objective 1, rts of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), and the uses contemplated are a; consistent therewith. a d B. The proposed density of Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club is 1.13 1.42 units per acre and less than the maximum density permitted by the FLUE Density Rating System is therefore consistent with the Future Land Use Element Policy 5.1. The entire subject property qualifies for a base density of four units per acre. Certain parts of the subject property are further subject to density adjustments including a proximity to =o Activity Center density bonus. U G) SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 2.4 MAXIMUM PROJECT DENSITY E 0 f4 Paee 2 of 6 Words underlined are added:words stud:i# uo3 are deletions C: L;sersI. shtonii Appl)ala,Local erosoilI Windows'.;emporan Internet i ils'.Content.0Ut100k\5MIUSZQB\Naples Heritage PUDA-PL-20150000416 (10-11-2016).docx Packet Pg. 88 9.A.5 No more than 799 combined single and multiple family dwelling units shall be constructed in the 558 563 acre total project area. If all 799 dwelling units are constructed, gross project density will be 4--4- 1.42 units per acre. U SECTION III 0 TRACT A DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS a) } X X * a) C) 3.2 USES PERMITTED a No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land use, in whole or part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family detached dwellings. N ti 2. Single family attached dwellings, zero lot-line and patio dwellings and/or z multi-family units. a. 3. An 18 hole golf course, clubhouses and related facilities, practice driving range, and golf course maintenance facility. These facilities will be substantially completed prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the 39e dwelling unit. o o. a) 4. Recreation Area. labeled RA on the Master Plan. limited to tennis courts. restrooms. landscaping and stormwater facilities. for use by all residents and guests. B. Accessory Uses: 6 1. Accessory uses and structures customary in golf course, single and U multiple family residential projects. Y 2. Project sales and administrative offices, which may occur in a residential �� or recreational building and/or in the Country Club complex, and/or in a temporary building until such time as permanent structures are available. F T.; 3. Model dwellings, in the single family lot are and/or in the single family/ multiple family tracts, during the period of project development and sales. a) U f6 Page 3 of 6 Words s underlined are added;wordstruck-t s ssgh are deletions _' Lser_'ardton_6,AppData`Local,17icrosohn,UindowsTemporary Internet Files vContent.OUtiook;5MViiUSZQB\Naples Heritage PUDA-PL-20150000416 (10-11-2015).docx Packet Pg. 89 9.A.5 Model dwellings shall be converted to permanent residents at the end of a two year period unless otherwise specifically approved by the County. 4. Signs as permitted by the Collier County Land Development Code in effect at the time permits are requested. 3.3 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS A maximum of 799 dwelling units may be constructed in this S 563 acre project co a) 3.6 MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS F. Recreation area. labeled RA on the Master Plan `C"; Principal structures: Front yard: 50 feet ' Side yard: 25 feet z Rear yard: 25 feet a U Preserve: 25 feet U Lighting shall be limited to that necessary for public safety and security. All lighting shall have full cut-off shields to prevent glare and spillage on adjacent �. residential development, shall utilize motion sensor for activation, and shall be limited to a maximum 10 feet in height. Maximum height shall he limited to one story not to exceed 12 Feet Zoned and 15 t3 feet Actual height. a) Hours of operation shall be limited to 7 AM to dusk. Amplified sound of any type shall not be permitted. a) * Y * * * * * Y * * * * 3.11 REQUIRED BUFFERS Buffers shall be installed along the rear yard of multi-family sites or recreational facilities which abut off-site single family zoned or vacant agriculturally zoned lands. Buffers shall U 4 Page4of6 `t Words underlined are added;words sate;thr;')1.;2h are deletions C z�hton_h` a,pJatdt weal` ;:rosoft�indows\Temporary Internet Files iContent.OUtiO0k\5MIUSZQB\Naples Heritage PUDA-PL-20150000416 (10-11-2016).docx Packet Pg. 90 9.A.5 separate the single family and multi-family development areas unless the necessity for a such buffers is waived due to a common architectural theme housing project. Buffers shall meet the criteria set forth in the Collier County Land Development Code. Buffering z requirements may be met with existing natural vegetation, installed vegetation, structural c' screening, or any combination thereof. Buffering plans shall be submitted to and o o approved by the Collier County Development Services Director prior to issuance of c permits for the facility required to be buffered. cti 0 a) r+ SECTION VI i TRAFFIC REQUIREMENTS i m a * * * * * * * * * * * * .m 6.2 IMPROVEMENT REQUIREMENTS N * * * * * * * * * * * * CO 0 N ti Heritage Golf and �Country� Club project which abuts the south line of Section 9, a s . -I , IP24 . ... t... ; - . . . . -.,. U ri�Ehtof way acquisition. a 0 U * * * * * * * * * * * * u m L 0 L1. SECTION VIII ce Q) WATER MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENTS 0 U SI 0 8.2 THE WATER MANGEMENT PLAN CONCEPT 2 -5- 354.1 35 of 558isplannedU ��4.1 acres the 563acre project as a stonwat�r catchment basin. 68.7 acres of lakes and 91.9 acres of natural/preserve area are included in this area. E Stormwater originating on lands to the north of the project will flow through the project by using culverts. swales, and preserved areas of the site in a manner intended to c duplicate predevelopment conditions. c' Flood protection will be provided to the project by raising buildings, roads, etc. in et conformance with South Florida Water Management District criteria for building pad Q elevation is the 100-yi ,zero-discharge storm elevation and the minimum road elevation is based on the 25 year storm event. After heavy rainfall events, surface waters stored in the E 0 QY Page 5 of 6 Words underlined are added;words stsa 1,thseu*h are deletions 0 C*sers ashton_hAppData'1.oeaCiMicrosof',Windows ernporarp intern Flies Heritage PUDA-PL-20150000416 (10-11-2016).docx Packet Pg. 91 9.A.5 catchment areas will be slowly discharged through small bleed down structures into the Ts existing preserved wetland slough. Off-site outfalls which receive stormwater discharge from the property will likely undergo modification in the future due to development/modification, at which time modifications to the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club water management plan may be required. o Exhibit"A-, PUD Master Development Plan, of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. a) 95-74, is deleted in its entirety and is hereby replaced by the new Exhibit "A", PUD Master Development Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein. _ CO cC ti et tD ti O U ca 15 Q 0 a) as U C6 Q :: C a) t v ti } Page 6 of 6 Words underlined arc added;words struck tire+arc deletions C ,Users.ashton_ir` nrDa.a Loeak.Mier,soft'o• indosys`JcmDorar} interna Files?Content.OUtIOOk\5MJUSZQB\Ndp}es Heritage PUDA-PL-20150000416 (10-11-2016).docx Packet Pg.92 9.A.6 O e-v c..cyp .il'Lty Growth Management Department Zoning Division Comprehensive Pliinninc Section MEMORANDUM m To: Eric Johnson, AICP,CFM, Principal Planner U Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section m From: Sue Faulkner, Principal Planner 0 Zoning Division, Comprehensive Planning Section ms c 0 Date: October 19,2016 0 0 Subject: Future Land Use Element Consistency Review 0 07 7LT1 PETITION NUMBER: PUDZ -PL20150001416 -REV 3 z N PETITION NAME: Naples Heritage Golf& Country Club PUD Rezone a 0 z REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting to add a±5.21 acre parcel to the ±558 acres Naples Heritage Golf& co Country Club Planned Unit Development (PUD). The rezone of the ±5.21 acres zoned "A" (Rural Agricultural District)to PUD will allow for the development of additional recreational facilities and a portion of the parcel would N be added to the preserve. The petitioner is also requesting to change the southerly 100' of the PUD (totaling±3.0 acres), from "possible future public thoroughfare right-of-way acquisition"to preserve in the PUD. a) m fY LOCATION: The subject site (±5.21-acre addition) is located ±1/2 mile east of Santa Barbara Blvd., ±1 mile south of Davis Blvd(SR 84) in Section 9, Township 50 South, Range 26 East. c m .M� COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING COMMENTS: The subject site is identified as Urban Designation, Urban •� Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth o Management Plan (GMP). w D Policy 5.1 in the Future Land Use Element states, in part, "All rezonings must be consistent with the Growth u-1. Management Plan." us m Staff reviewed the proposed land uses for consistency with the Urban Designation. Adding the±5.21 acres to the Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD for the development of additional recreational facilities and a portion of this acreage for preserve are both non-residential uses listed(#2 -Parks, open space and recreational uses)in the w Urban Designation of the FLUE; and therefore are consistent with the GMP. Q m The Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD is located within the Urban Designated Area and therefore is E reviewed for consistency with the Density Rating System of the FLUE. A base density of 4 residential dwelling 0 as units per gross acre may be allowed in the Urban Designated Area,though this is not an entitlement.This base level of density may be adjusted depending upon the location and characteristics of the project.The Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club PUD (Ordinance 95-74) was approved December 12, 1995 for 799 dwelling units on 558 acres; which is an approved density of approximately 1.43 dwelling units per acre. By adding±5.21 acres (Agricultural parcel)to the±558 acres of the PUD,the PUD would then have a total of 563.21 acres. The density would then be recalculated to a slight reduction to1.42 dwelling units per gross acre (799 dwelling units _ 563.21 acres); which Page 1 of 2 Packet Pg.93 9.A.6 according to the Density Rating System is well below the base density of 4 dwelling units per gross acre in the Urban Designation. The re-calculated density with the additional acreage is consistent with the FLUE of the GMP. FLUE Policy 5.4 (shown below in italics) followed by staff analysis in bold text. FLUE Policy 5.4: New developments shall be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land uses, as set forth in the Land Development Code (Ordinance 04-41, adopted June 22, 2004 and effective October 18, 2004, as amended). [Comprehensive Planning staff leaves this determination to Zoning staff as part of their review of the petition.] As the existing PUD is at or near buildout, the proposed addition is small and only proposed for recreation uses, and the other use change is for preserve area, staff deemed it unnecessary to review FLUE Objective 7 and related Policies regarding Smart Growth principles. CONCLUSION c.) This rezone petition may be deemed consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth c Management Plan. 0 0 cc: Michael Bosi,AICP,Director,Zoning Division David Weeks,AICP,Growth Management Manager, Zoning Division,Comprehensive Planning Section Raymond V. Bellows,Manager,Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section G:ACDES Planning Services\Consistency Reviews\2016\PUDZ\PUDZ-PL2015-1416 Naples Heritage R3.docx a) as to ti 0 a) lY U a) N O U w -J U- C, 5 Ct . a) U ti Page 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 94 Ailuno0 pue l oo a6elpaH seldeN : 9LVZ) luawese3 uogenJesuo0;o uoIleoen- L luewyoefV :luawyoeilV u, N- a) CL \ EXHIBIT "A" Y U SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION a LAT 39 NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & BLOCK B COUNTRY CLUB PHASE TWO-A TRACT C5 PB 28, PG 11 CONSERVATION AND BUFFER EASEMENT LOT 6 BLOCK F 589'35'44"E 24.89' 'R=530.00 A=24.45 N89'35'44"W 326,70' ,/ CH=S0O'34'24"W 24.45' a LOT 5 0BLACK F 10771 SQ. FT. OR o 0.247 ACRES +7- \\�G%u' ?� �o 0 C7 LAT 4 0, O W BLACK F ri 1b o /N t"-‘ ,� N t% NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & o `� 0 LOT 3 COUNTRY CLUB, INC. w BLOCK F PARCEL No. 00407440001 f Pj a a 4 1 0 O co �p 1 O r // $ LOT 2 tr L^ /�f BLOCK F i o w , m f �LOT 1 � 10' CCCBE AS SHOWN a, m BLOCK F , ON PLAT OF NAPLES tp rn (.4 ' HERITAGE GOLF & / Q) . COUNTRY CLUB PHASE 0N ,.� ONE PB 26, PG 80 P.O.B. , ' NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & ~S89'16'S3"W 24.55' COUNTRY CLUB PHASE ONE z PB 26, PG 73 0 Q TRACT C5 P w CONSERVATION AND BUFFER EASEMENT W C7 •J /j 1 b / SIGtdEO `" i ..,` S / 71 G� o w TRACT RW4 f O o 100' FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAY RESERVATION William C. McAnly, P.S.M. #1543 �, LEGAL DESCRIPTION: -- — SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION ON SHEET 1 OF 2 LSKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION McANLY ENGINEERING IIIN IIVACATION OF EASEMENT AND DESIGN INC. ENGINEERING, PLANNING, LES HERITAGE GOLF &COUNTRY GWS AND LAND SURVEYING PHASE TWO-A 2025 JkC BOULEVARD-SUITE 5 1 ADDED CCCBE TO VACATION AREA 08 17/16 I NAPLES,FLORIDA 34109II / SCALE: 1'"700 OWN.:R.N. CHK:AMR DATE:1/15/16 (232)293-5289 FAX(234)593-5248 NO, REVISIONS DATE COPYRIGHT,2016 81'McANLY ENGINEERING AND D£SiGN,INC.ALL RIGHTS RESERVED PROJECT: 130209 I SHEET: 2 OE 2 4uno0 pue}Io0 e6ei!JeH seideN : 9L17z) ;uawese3 uoi}enaasuo0}o uoi;eoen- L;uawyoe4p' :;uewyae#;y ti co McANLY ENGINEERING th AND DESIGN INC. a Y (.) CIVIL ENGINEERING STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING a. EXHIBIT " A " LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PORTION OF THE CONSERVATION BUFFER EASEMENT TRACT C5 AND A PORTION OF THE 10' CCCBE EASEMENT CONTAINED WITHIN THE FOLLOWING DESCRIPTION TO BE VACATED LOCATED IN NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF& COUNTRY CLUB PHASE ONE COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA AUGUST 17,2016 BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 1, BLOCK F OF NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & COUN MY CLUB PHASE TWO A,AS RECORDED IN THE LAND RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY IN PLAT BOOK 28 PAGE 11 AND RUNNING THENCE , CROSSING THE EXISTING CONSERVATION BUFFER EASEMENT(TRACT C5) AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF NAPLES .HERITAGE GOLF& COUNTRY CLUB PHASE ONE, AS RECORDED IN SAID LAND RECORDS IN PLAT BOOK 26 PAGES 73 THROUGH 80 ; S 89°16'53"W 24.55' TO THE OUTLINE OF THE LANDS CONVEYED TO NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF & COUNTRY CLUB IN O.R. BOOK 3690 PAGE 2610; THENCE BINDING THEREON N00°43'07"W 440.82' TO THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL;THENCE CROSSING THE EXISTING CONSERVATION BUFFER EASEMENT, AFORESAID S89°35'44"E 24.89' TO THE WESTERLY OUTLINE OF COLONIAL COURT AS SHOWN ON THE AFORESAID PLAT OF PHASE TWO A; THENCE BINDING THEREON BY A NON-TANGENT CURVE TO THE LEFT IN A SOUTHWESTERLY DIRECTION OF RADIUS 530.00' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 24.45', SAID ARC BEING SUBTENDED BY A CHORD BEARING S00°34'24"W 24.45'; THENCE S00°44'53"E 222.24' TO THE NORTHWES I'ERLY CORNER OF LOT 1 AFORESAID;THENCE BINDING ON THE WESTERLY OUTLINE OF LOT I, S00°44'53"E 193.65' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 10771 SQ.FT OR 0.247 ACRES MORE OR LESS PREPARED BY: js ~' WILLIAM C. McANLY P.S.M. FLORIDA REGISTRATION NO. 1543 McANLY ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, INC. 2025 J& C BLVD. SUITE S NAPLES FL 34109 2025 J&C BOULEVARD -SUITE 5 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34109-6204 PHONE (239)593-3299 FAX (239)593-3298 9.A.9 Naples Bailll NOV'S NaplasNewscom Published Daily Naples,FL 34110 Affidavit of Publication State of Florida Counties of Collier and Lee O Before the undersigned they serve as the authority, personally appeared Daniel McDermott who on oath says that U he serves as Inside Sales Manager of the Naples Daily News,a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier Coun- ty,Florida;distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida;that the attached copy of the advertising was published w in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily News is a newspaper published o at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published o in said Collier County, Florida; distributed in Collier and Lee counties of Florida, each day and has been entered as a� second class mail matter at the post office in Naples,in said Collier County,Florida,for a period of one year next pre- ceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that he has neither paid nor promised any person,or corporation any discount, rebate,commission or refund for the purpose of securing this = advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. Customer Ad Number Copyline P.O.# BCC/ZONING DEPARTMENT 1324933 PUBLIC HEARING 45-172052 CD ti et N_ ub Dates October 28, 2016 O U 4- w+ O z to a) J rn a) v to a> ' d w (Sign ture of affiant) Sworn to and subscribed before me �,►,�'�d•-. IVONNE GORI po .i` . Notary Public -State of Florida This Novembe 04, 2016 + Commission r FF 900810 I ,�, _ ec My Comm.Expires Jul 16,2019 / • 4 '• '° ` Bonded through National Notary Assn. (Signatur- of affiant) Packet Pg. 97 9.A.9 Naples Daily News today,October 26,2016 23. Fr NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING r *„ NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Pham nc 'mc, Comm ss on at 9:00 A.M,on Thursday,November 17,2016,in the Board of Count at+ ' Commissioner's Meeting Room Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 Tamiam C gg % Trail East,Naples FL,to consider cu E ae��k d 8- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIEF : ;,_ t r., d•= s$ COUNTY,FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.2004-41,AS AMENDED.THE Imo.., 'a _ * COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE (4 T € - . ‘ ' COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF C. �, - »` ,�;: ` � - COLLIER COUNTY.FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS W 0 _ MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN 0 Z DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE RURAL AGRICULTURAL ZONING - ) DISTRICT TO THE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY(REF-1)FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF MORGAN ROAD,APPROXIMATELY 750 FEET NORTH OF Co;: - SABAL PALM ROAD IN SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH.RANGE 26 EAST , COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,CONSISTING OF 5.7x ACRES;AND BY PROVIDING C W -.' t _s' 1 AN EFFECTIVE DATE.(RZ-PL20160001132) N _ U p CL) Q J �1 o e PROJECT LOCATION 1 cL RS •Q N D 'Modern criminals target Americans both from inside oar bordersd from abroad,.Assistant _ __IRanlesnake Hammock RD Z Z < 0_ Attorney General Leslie Caldwell says. co Feds charge dozens in IRS �'„r . cn agent immigration scam ` u{ SPF CAll interested parties are invited to appear and be heard. Comas of the proposer O KEVIN 1001N505 living ahrnad.The court documents also ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerk's office N uuo,ppn outlined charges against Eve call center fourth floor,Collier County Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 401 operations. Naples,FL.one week prior to the scheduled hearing.Written comments must be filer WASHINGTON-Federal authorities "This is a transnational problem,and war the Zoning Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to Thursday,November 17 unsealed an indictment Thursday charg- demonstrates that modern criminals tar- 2016. 03 i.: C log St people in a vast scheme in which get Atnericans both from inside our barZE - d a_ 0 suspects posed as Internal Revenue Ser- dens and from abroad;'Assistant Atter- II a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Collier County Planning (f) .. I C :7-7-i vice agents and immigration authorities ney General Leslie Caldwell said of the Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or heanng,he wll La :E U _ to siphon more than$300 million from three-year investigation. need a record of that proceeding,and for such purpose he may need to ensure that n Uthousands of unwitting victims. The co-conspirators, according re verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony ane e U) C U 0 The scheme,which employed a net- federal authorities,used so-called"ha- evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. ' > 0) 0 it of telephone cell center based in wala transfer in which money is trans- It you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodaf order tc 0 0 India,relied personalinformation b ferred internationallyioutside of the for- participate in this proceeding you are entitled,at no cost to you to to provision o < < rained from data brokers to target at mal banking system to direct extorted certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilites Management Division A least 15.000 victims with threats of lines, funds to accounts belonging to U.S: boated at 3335 Tamlami Trail East,Suite 101,Naples,FL 34112-5356,(239)252'o deportation or imprisonment if they did based individuals. 8380.at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices far the hearinc 0 not pay fees to clear fictitious deport:- In the case of a San Diego victim, impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. ori tion warrants and phony tax debtsprosecutors allege that a call center ex- In the thousands of cases where vie- torted$12300 from the OS-year-old worn- tuns did agree to settle the fictitious ac- an after threatening her with arrest if Collier County Planning Commission ants,the money allegedly was lain- she did not settle phony tax i'iolations. Mark Strain,Chairman ie dared through groups of U.S.co-conspir- The same day that the payment was _ C ators using wire transfers and debit made.a IDS-based suspect allegedly a t— cards. loaded a dehit card in the amount of the z In Twenty of the 24 ITS suspects have payment to purchase money orders in cei (V been arrested,officials said Thursday. Frisco,locus October 28,2018 No.1324912 c Thirty-two suspects coin believed to be M SE M X NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING 2 0 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE CCI Q 0 Q Notice is hereby given that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Z M Z Commission at 9:00 A.M.,on Thursday,November 17,2016,In the Board of County Noticc,s neectree, wu m mold try/ne Ophr'._.ourn Mann,Commits!,, ,Z Commissioner's Meet Room,Third Floor,Collier Government Center,3299 Tamiami local is ,.t,Erwtonm.n,l/love,.oulnoil..9 do 4.M.,on , ov.m ,mm,:ern it a Trail East.Naples FL..to consider o o coy mmasionars Mee,S r Tho=roolcdllhe Gy.amm.Tnoans.3295 Tama,Trail east fi CD AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER NH'''''H en .0 COUNT', FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE N0,95-74.THE NAPLES CIE.:TACO EGOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND AMENDING AN ORDINANCE cF T-E.BOARD OF CauNr.ovevissi0N'ea_=OF 00_u0R coon-'.FLORIDA ora=_Nom, a ORDINANCE NO,2004-41,THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, Oivrcuu E NUMBER vi-15. COMMONLY KNOWN As THE REGE,0 AL,TOHAUS oi,ocs 0 oar E BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OF MAPS BY CHANGING 'EVELORMEN1.By nEI E'559 PROVISIONS 0FLArmo TO RESTORATION of am.asn sr AND Alt, c, Z QD Or N r E rag='moil^^: NATIVE VEGETATION TO ACCOMMODATE ADORI0NA.r'A0NING ON T0AC- ss S THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL 5.21.ACRES OF LAND ZONED o_=5 C >, RURAL AGRICULTURAL(A)TO NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB PUD: ADDING TWO AD,.ROIN:soNHAZEL ROAD.evD=LErIN'p OUTDATED.ROViaious.BY ADDING DEVIAr OctIQ C 0 ]— BY REVISING THE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION,BY ADDING A RECREATION AREA TO R_ o to -is,rowsRVEs..sABLE 00.5 novel ANE a0_orth0000 us iREV.,anants.BY REV.,c TRACT A:9,REVISING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS.BY AMENDING THE MASTER SMATTER='-AN r_RECONFIGURE THE WILDLIFE AND RE-EunoN AREA A.,D DEP,„THE PARK!, E Z a) a) 0 PLAN;BY ADDING A TENNIS CENTER CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN AND A LANDSCAPEduneGEv r R 50_” ._= nr v.Ecin .. cPR - ACREAGE CF rr!s -0 UJ N 0 BUFFER EXHIBIT,AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE.T-E SUBJECTPROTERTY PR^1E-=ROM lar A^R,to 155 ACRES AND Bo PROVIDING AN_BroCnvE DA,THE PROPER,'I < C 0 CONSISTING OF 563-,ACRES,IS LOCATED SOUTH OF DAVIS BOULEVARD AND WEST LOCATEDON THE EAET SIDES O uLUNa ROAD NO,HOG HAZEL ROADAND SOUTH o .EY,`¢ OF COLLIER BOULEVARD IN SECTIONS 3,4.9 AND 10,TOWNSHIP 50SOUTH_RANG: n- a.. h t .I •. FOR A .Nn.T Na o 26 EAST,COWER COUNTY,FLORIDA.(PUDZ-PL20150001416] no ail,F-s.1 ro n r a antn'no- 21.2 1 - / eon -Sb RRo c Ira �' m ,, 100AT 05 I.w �sa ll, .t FW I . ' "' ® I.m .� a' _l, T �-� ,,,. 1 ri 51C Ali mterestec podles arenvited to appear end be heard. Copes al tot proposed ORDINANCE All Interested parties are Invited to appear and be heard. Copies of the proposed 'mil a made available to'Inspector a:the Miller County Clerk's office,touch fiopr Collier Count, 4, C.0 ORDINANCE will be made available for inspection at the Collier County Clerks office0,ever mens center.3259 East tam air Trail n ap,.Naples,EL Oct week pr t edw=c 'WIr fourth Scot,Collier County Government Cerate'3299 Tamiami Trail East Siete 401, nearing ,Amite,comments must be fled war m0 Zoning D,vison,Zoning Services Seaton,poor tc 4seare es, Naples.FL,one week prior to the scheduled hearire Written comments must be tied Thursday.Novemoe•17,2016_ AK*4 1✓ $ • 0 with the Zonl^g Division,Zoning Services Section,prior to Thursday,November 17, e tai (rV 2016. r 2 person d .appeal any decision rade by the Coll Cour,°1 nnn e wa' a -0000 to any b d at such t n6 or hearing ee II.Bed record 1 t r p etlmg and for such P po h oat a verbatim fee f e Bed g.._.ace hitt 'el 0/ CO If 3 person decides to appeal any der so ad by the Collier County Planning Commission with respect to any caner considered M Sc n meeting or nearing.he will neep a record of lost proceeding and forsue])purpose he may need t ensure that a ndl,oes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal s to be eased. . N verbatim record of the proceedings i5 made,which record induces the test mony and r you area her ,n ,mobile who needs an,acsrmmndatnn in order to t,u ♦♦qq evidence upon which the appeal is to be eased. v w paniapate in iP fiIsm roceecImp you are emoted.at no rosoo you.to the provision of celain ass,stance,Please contact Inn C) If you are 2 person with a disability who needs any accommodatior in order to Collier County Faces en Management Divisionlocated at3335'lam,am'.Trail East.Sone 101,Naples.FE participate In this preceeding,you are entitled,at no cost l0 you,to the prov,c an of 34112-535.6.(235252-0380,at least Iwo rays prior to One meetng.assisted listening devices for ins 4certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Manaoeme.nt Derision, -eared impaired are avaciahie in the Board of county Commisones Otter. onefe '✓ .12 located at 3335 Ta.miaml Trail East.Suite 101 Naples,FL 34112-5355.1239)252- 4 c... 6380,at least two days prior to the meeting.Assisted listening devices for the hearing Cal,er ZIcsoll P am-op commission commission impaired are avaieabie In the Board of County Commissioner'5 Office. Mark Strain,Coalman '1 C.) Collier County Planning Commission k O Mark Strain,Chairman link t ^a ` October 28,2016 ND-1324933 October 28.2016 No.1324951 TifaW •V t • s R LI.. Packet Pg.98 9.A.9 Petition No. PUDZ-PL20150001416 AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE FOR PROVIDING INDIVIDUAL MAIL NOTICE TO AFFECTED PROPERTY OWNERS 1. I hereby certify that pursuant to Subsections 10.03.05.B.8 and 10.03.05.B.10 of the Collier County Land Development Code. I did give notice of the public hearing before the Collier County Planning Commission scheduled for November 17. 2016 by U.S. mail to the affected property owners at the addresses provided to me by the Collier „4 County Property Appraiser's Office on October 28. 2016, A copy of the 0 list of addresses from the Collier County Property Appraiser's Office is cc attached to this Affidavit. z N 47 ca 2. Copies of the letters mailed to the affected property owners are attached to ti this Affidavit. cci Dated this day of �' 1, , ., �� �` ' 2-016. "CE Signature E U Ali as PriIat Name 1i r1 � 11 I Print Titlecis 1 oft Packet Pg. 99 9.A.9 STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) ss COUNTY OF COLLIER) BEFORE ME, a duly authorized notary of the State of Florida, personally appeared � +S2Z— - , who is personally known to me or produced 1"r Vt-�'' CcJ �i C'Ci} as identification, and under oath stated that the above is true and correct c� and to the best of his/her knowledge. 0 U DATED this 3 day of 13 , 2016. C5 o ,D10t Dt 0 �i, m Notary, State of Florida ��\ issoh' O p7 • . m o a #FF998114 ' = Notary Printed Name 9 . moi, 1- •°'9-0 Is!State t.'• 44 My commission expires: CV u, 0 cc w 0 z Ta a) -J o) 9+ C N 0 f6 4-. C N E f6 2 of 2 Packet Pg. 100 9.A.9 COLLIER COUNTY Growth Management Department October 19, 2016 Dear Property Owner: This is to advise you that because you may have interest in the proceedings or you own property located within 500 feet (urban areas) or 1,000 feet (rural areas) of the following described property, that a public hearing will be held by the Collier County Planning Commission at 9:00 A.M., on November 17, 2016, in the Board of County Commissioners meeting room, third floor, Collier Government Center, 3299 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL., to consider: An Ordinance of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida amending Ordinance No. 95-74, the v Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club Planned Unit Development, and amending Ordinance No. 2004-41, the Collier County Land Development Code, by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of an additional 5.21± acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) to Naples Heritage Golf and Country Club v PUD; by revising the property description; by adding a recreation area to Tract A; by revising development standards; by amending the Master Plan; by adding a tennis center conceptual site plan and a landscape buffer exhibit; and providing o an effective date. The subject property, consisting of 563± acres, is located south of Davis Boulevard and west of Collier C9 Boulevard in Sections 3, 4, 9 And 10, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [PUDZ- rn PL20150001416] You are invited to appear and be heard at the public hearing. You may also submit your comments in writing. NOTE: INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES ON ANY ITEM. INDIVIDUALS SELECTED TO SPEAK ON BEHALF OF AN ORGANIZATION OR GROUP ARE ENCOURAGED AND MAY BE ALLOTTED 10 MINUTES TO SPEAK ON AN ITEM IF SO RECOGNIZED BY THE CHAIRMAN. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE ti WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE CCPC AGENDA PACKETS MUST SUBMIT SAID MATERIAL MINIMUM OF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE RESPECTIVE PUBLIC HEARING. IN ANY CASE, WRITTEN MATERIALS INTENDED TO BE CONSIDERED BY THE CCPC SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE COUNTY STAFF MEMBER NOTED No BELOW, A MINIMUM OF SEVEN DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD AND WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS IF APPLICABLE. 0 z Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Collier County Planning Commission will need a record of the �a proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, ami which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. J a) If you are a person with a disability who needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are c entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management p Department, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East, Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112-5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days E prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County 2 w Commissioners Office. This petition, and other pertinent information related to this petition, is kept on file and may be reviewed at the Growth Management Department building located at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. Please contact the staff member noted below at (239)-252-2931 to set up an appointment if you wish to review the file. Sincerely, Eric L. Johnson,AICP,CFM,LEED Green Associate 'rincipal Planner Packet Pg. 101 L 1,=1 1 9.A.9 I 4114,16, a �1 �I fi �I Ell a l sI �I cci a Ei a ti t II ,,I ` �� I®ell 4.?: y 7 1 21 m `Ilr�llllllllllllllllllll mitip1 \ -■ II Nu Ei r'II/�1�II�IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII111IG - � � ��/1 • iiim 1.,14 11111111IgN1t111 c E `\OIIIIIIIIIIID\O\�Ip OlIaIrN- A —111111111111111111111 11 'I� AI N_ =_:: ::.11411.1121111 1 = IIIII_IIIIIII 111 of w , . aM # ci N" op c own 1 � � � p c am c 1 fhb \\111j11111111 \ ,.,� ai a I= �'� `1111//111111111111111111\\\ 1zi- it.N 1101 = p •IN .hnpAo�0 Vv. till1171,1 on111ill Ia h U 1 z c 16"BILtiwtl / `` , ..„....r-- GILt-tl ..8 ( _ 4001001110, -),.. qp, riaa..--4,1P4--.6.-rok a d 1 J R'1, ati, 1 Li 0 C ,01Et Alkt 11 44-, I 14 ,40 Lt.. quulump4 ai O _ /IIIItlVj I iq : , �`ii.* d1 1 1 IIIIINIII►1���\11IIIIt1►v` i i_= *'0p0 1 � •4 , sumo.4 pallid as is 0'-SII G♦tp���``\\\ al___-4111.11.,„,."m '��� �,unnaa.01 int♦baa re1�iuum emn 40 ��' ._ /pq��ne neiminaa' 1_ va i_ • U► iwIalnidly/mmnln ,' UIIIIIIII'mll4/� _.— = �Ig11D\� ♦ �~ W\ . tr____� IiI _ _ �, EinsIlnnnliliimmi1111U111i11111111111l I gI r LO l�. 7$11412114411111e61611r l ,�IaIaaai`i d1illi -re...„ Ilr_"'I;1...—.1.. Mill - N: f4 `. y._ G\ of BE� ����_ t ♦ ► IIOIaaa / LL L 111111111 � to EL 31V05 0110N N :MC d4t �1, Z' Boa Q U w o` z 5 a F O L,''',`,, a a� w o w Z �_ k'� H o I z� i a s i a F / o a; IR, . m� --op[�j �-L J 56'a'O I��v a x SR --u 1 .2•13e _I c Oavndinoe a311-100 i j Q --.i.,,,:,a// o oavn3�noe aamoo V iw �se'a� a w t.. wr. I a o 1=1 wi ooo'- U o�/I1/ h / a I — �. N W1a IIS = ii 0 IIIa ( ¢ Occ �G 76 r^ I O o �-�" ZNv "' I a0 ' 1iY O Q yoga °a H Woo 'gn �; a n vevs g< x $� m i a� NOI1VINV'Id �w z 'c',I a"J 'J ;w Fo z 1 �aU _= fFl x io r oavnfiinoe � � O a W w vWeaVBNV1NV5 I pl HaHOa Vfi H1NVS ; OaHn3lnOt HaV8aH8 ,VIN S' - ¢ c c </ W L---1, / 7 §. , > J I./ - 3Ji I I Lirc rm W LL „_ IYIi n O� ¢F'�' QLI m fa�Km O m�_` - K'a uu N m in m j g ni m_f - _ aO jigs . J ,I OVOa NaVfi A1Nnoo S31V153 o / c Da33N3LLI1N1 ¢i ��" FA o ✓ Da3eN3LIHM �� ���� U Packet Pg. 102 b _ ,«_ ,31NIOd NAOa0 — m I". 9.A.10 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday,December 13,2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room,Third Floor, Collier Government Center,3299 Tamiami Trail East,Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M.The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: .a The purpose of the hearing is to consider: = 0 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.95-74,THE NAPLES HERITAGE c GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, a AND AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, THE COLLIER 0 COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE,BY AMENDING THE U APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING ri 0 THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF AN ADDITIONAL O1 us 5.21± ACRES OF LAND ZONED RURAL AGRICULTURAL (A) TO NAPLES HERITAGE GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB a PUD; BY REVISING THE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION; BY ro ADDING A RECREATION AREA TO TRACT A; BY REVISING DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS; BY AMENDING THE MASTER ro as PLAN; BY ADDING A TENNIS CENTER CONCEPTUAL dcis SITE PLAN AND A LANDSCAPE BUFFER EXHIBIT; AND .'= PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, z 6 CONSISTING OF 563± ACRES, IS LOCATED SOUTH OF o I DAVIS BOULEVARD AND WEST OF COLLIER BOULEVARD IN a us SECTIONS 3,4,9 AND 10,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 9 0 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA.(PUDZ PL20150001416] a tr A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the w Z Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are ,,, invited to attend and be heard. o ti m T. NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must Z N register with the County manag=-er prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be 'a M limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual r M to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. D cv If recc:gnrzed by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or m (0 organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. — Z a Persons wishing have written or graphic materials included in Lilt,Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum a) d of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. in any case, us a) written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall Q be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials used in -a presentations before the Board vvill become a permanent part et of tilt record. o Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board a) will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and m evidence upon which the appeal is based. E uarE a person,.,,,itti",di5 oiiit'ohrtnc'edsaint Koccorrrmn' atiai U in order to f articipcts' in this proceeding. you are f ntitied. at co no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact `ht Collier County Facile r Management Division. Q Ic nt d at 37,3E Tamiami T it East, Suite 101. Naples.FL 3413. tE. (23 ,0 at feast two hoc prior to tfie mrc:Nrc. Assisted li t€ning devices for the hearing impaired are�availabie, in Board if Co nt\Commissioners,Of-Tice. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA CHAIRMAN DONNA FIALA DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK By: Martha Vergara,Deputy Clerk (SEAL) November 23,2016 No.1364071 Packet Pg. 103