The URL can be used to link to this page

HEX Agenda 12/08/2016 COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER HEARINGS AGENDA DECEMBER 8, 2016 it AGENDA THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 9:00 AM ON THURSDAY,DECEMBER 8,2016 IN CONFERENCE ROOM 610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/PLANNING&REGULATION BUILDING,2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE,NAPLES, FLORIDA INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED DURING PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT, PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL. THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. REVIEW OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF PRIOR MEETING MINUTES: November 10,2016 4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: NOTE: This item was continued from the November 10,2016 HEX Meeting A. PETITION NO. ZLTR(CUD)-PL20160002442 — Global Properties of Naples, LLC requests affirmation of a zoning verification letter issued by the Planning and Zoning Division pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.06, in which County staff determined that the proposed use of indoor air conditioned self-storage/mini-warehouse (SIC 4225) greater than 65,000 square feet of gross floor area is comparable in nature to those uses permitted to exceed 65,000 square feet of gross floor area, including group care facility, physical fitness facility, hotel, and department store, in Tract MU, Mixed-Use Development, under Section I.B of the Vincentian Village MPUD, Ordinance No. 2015- 33, as amended. The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Southwest Boulevard and U.S. 41 in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of ±30.68 acres. [Coordinator,Ray Bellows,Zoning Manager] B. PETITION NO. ZLTR (CUD)-PL20160002571 — Hulett Environmental Services, Inc. requests affirmation of a zoning verification letter issued by the Planning and Zoning Division pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.06, in which County staff determined that the proposed use of pest control and extermination business (SIC 7342) is comparable in nature to other permitted principal uses in the area described as "Both East and West of the Florida Power&Light Easement"under Section 3.2(A) of the City Gate Commerce Park PUD, Ordinance No. 88-93, as amended. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard and City Gate Drive, in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of±1.65 acres. [Coordinator: Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager] C. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20150002852 — Development Consulting LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance Nos. 82-40 and 84-21, as amended, Green Heron, a Planned Unit Development,to amend the Master Plan to add an access point to the 5 acre commercial tract from Radio Road. The subject property is located north of Radio Road, approximately 'h mile west of the intersection of Radio Road and Davis Boulevard, in Section 33, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Daniel J. Smith,AICP,Principal Planner] D. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20160002044 — Wilton Land Company, LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 2007-30, as amended,the Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD,to reduce the minimum perimeter PUD setback for accessory uses to 10 feet, and to add a deviation to allow accessory structures to be constructed prior to construction of a principal use, only for two proposed accessory tower structures located along the western PUD boundary as depicted on Exhibit C-1 and further shown on Exhibit C-2. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard intersection, in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 18.99± acres. [Coordinator: Fred Reischl, AICP, Principal Planner] 5. OTHER BUSINESS 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS 7. ADJOURN AGENDA ITEM 4-A Collier County Krt. STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING: DECEMBER 8, 2016 SUBJECT: ZLTR (CUD)-PL20160002442, VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(MPUD) APPLICANT/AGENT: Applicant: Global Properties of Naples, LLC 2614 Tamiami Trail N., #615 Naples, FL 34103 Agent: Bob Mulhere, FAICP Hole Montes 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 REQUESTED ACTION: The Applicant wishes to have the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) affirm a zoning verification letter issued by the Planning and Zoning Division pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.06, in which County staff determined that the proposed use of indoor air conditioned self-storage/mini-warehouse (SIC 4225) greater than 65,000 square feet of gross floor area is comparable in nature to those uses permitted to exceed 65,000 square feet of gross floor area, including group care facility, physical fitness facility, hotel, and department store, in Tract MU, Mixed-Use Development, under Section I.B of the Vincentian Village MPUD, Ordinance No. 2015-33, as amended. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Southwest Boulevard and U.S. 41 in Section 32. Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of±30.68 acres. ZLTR(CUD)-PL20160002442 Page 1 of 5 Vincentian Village MPUD Rev. 11/16/16 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: Subject: Vincentian Village Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development(MPUD) North: Tamiami Trail East Right-of-Way (ROW) and then Whistlers Cove PUD East: Mobile Home Zoning South: Residential Single-family (RSF-4)zoning West: Residential Single-family, RSF-4 and Heavy Commercial District(C-5) se roffP • ` IP _ . x ` r . \ ,,_ It, gin, \. _. '", ' s A. " Pr q)(r i',. y --- v x N. '' ..mow. , ,. tir �_�- * #� `4 - t��AnisinTRL III If Ami Rivi c...,,,.....,..,„,,„:„......N:s` �i T. ' --t�,�.TRL7 rr a. "� a i 3� 1 . .� Aerial Photo (Collier County Property Appraiser) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Applicant seeks a determination that an indoor air-conditioned, self-storage/mini- warehouse, Standard Industrial Code (SIC) 4225, greater than 65,000 square feet of gross floor area is comparable in nature to those uses permitted to exceed 65,000 square feet of gross floor area, including group care facility, physical fitness facility, hotel, and department store, in Tract MU, Mixed-Use Development, under Section I.B of the Vincentian Village MPUD, Ordinance No. 2015-33,as amended. The applicant requested a Zoning Verification Letter (ZLTR) from the Planning & Zoning Director on September 12, 2016. The Director issued a ZLTR stating that an indoor air- ZLTR(CUD)-PL20160002442 Page 2 of 5 Vincentian Village MPUD Rev. 11/16/16 conditioned self-storage/mini warehouse (SIC 4225) use is comparable to the other permitted uses identified as permitted uses within the within the Vincentian Village MPUD and which are not subject to the maximum 65,000 square foot limitation. This hearing is to seek affirmation of that opinion by the HEX. ANALYSIS: LDC Section 10.02.06 J.1.b, Comparable Use Determinations, states the following: "The County Manager or Designee may issue a zoning verification letter to determine whether a use within a PUD is consistent and compatible with the surrounding uses within the PUD. To be effective, the zoning verification letter shall be approved by the BCC by resolution, at an advertised public hearing." The BCC delegated this duty to the Hearing Examiner through Ordinance 2013-25. Based upon staff's review of the current Official Zoning Atlas, an element of the Collier County Land Development Code(LDC), Ordinance 04-41,as amended, staff has confirmed that the subject property has a zoning designation of the Vincentian Village MPUD. The permitted uses within this MPUD are listed in Exhibit A.I.B. Commercial Uses which includes the #64 reads as follows: "any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC." Staff has compared the proposed use with the list of permitted uses approved in the Vincentian Village MPUD as follows: 1. The proposed Self-Storage/Mini-warehouse use, if limited to indoor air-conditioned only facility, is similar in nature to many of the other uses permitted in the subject PUD, in terms of building scale, and physical form. 2. The PUD allows a number of other uses which are also permitted in C-5 zoning and which are more intense in terms of traffic generation and many other potential impacts, including light, noise, and odor. These uses include, but are not limited to the following: • Auto and Home Supply Stores(5531); • Automotive services(7549)except that this shall not be construed to permit the activity of'wrecker service(towing)automobiles,road and towing service; • Department stores(5311)-Permitted to exceed the PUD cap of 65,000 square feet; • Hospitals(8062); • Hotels(7011,hotel only),limited to 150 rooms-Permitted to exceed the PUD cap of 65,000 square feet; • Motion picture theaters(7832); ZLTR(CUD)-PL20160002442 Page 3 of 5 Vincentian Village MPUD Rev. 11/16/16 3. The air-conditioned self-storage/mini warehouse use is subject to the LDC architectural standards,including standards specifically applicable to this use(which address issues of compatibility). 4. The use is limited to indoor storage only. The petitioner has submitted a traffic analysis that compares the trip generation of hotels, greater than 65,000 square feet of gross floor area(a permitted use within this MPUD)to an indoor air-conditioned self-storage use. This analysis indicates that a 150 room hotel is estimated to generate 1,334 daily trips, with 87 AM peak hour trips and 91 PM peak hour trips. In comparison, a 100,000 square foot indoor self-storage facility is estimated to generate 250 daily trips with only 14 AM peak hour and 25 PM peak hour trips. Staff concurs with the finding that an indoor air-conditioned self-storage/mini-warehouse is a less intense trip generator. Based upon above analysis, the use of an indoor air-conditioned self-storage/mini storage use is comparable and similar in nature to the other permitted uses within this MPUD and which may exceed 65,000 square feet of gross floor area, in terms of building scale, physical form,intensity and business character,but less intrusive than those uses in terms of traffic, noise,odors, solid waste generation, and lighting. Furthermore, compliance with the architectural, site-design, and landscaping requirements ensures that the facility will be similar in nature to the other listed PUD uses and those uses that are permitted to exceed 65,000 square feet of gross floor area. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on 11/28/2016. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner affirm the opinions of the Zoning Manager that the use of an air-conditioned self-storage/mini warehouse (SIC 4225) is comparable and compatible to other permitted commercial uses within Section I.B of the Vincentian Village MPUD,Ordinance 15-33,as amended with one stipulation: 1. The building shall resemble an office use,meeting the architectural standards of the LDC with storage doors internal to the building;there shall be no overhead doors on any external building facade. Attachments: A. Zoning Verification Letter B. Application ZLTR(CUD)-PL20160002442 Page 4 of 6 Vincentian Village MPUD Rev. 11/21/16 PREPARED BY: l-- ii t7 iS RAYM D . BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONIN DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: MICHAEL BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION ZLTR(CUD)-PL20160002442 Page 5 of 5 Vincentian Village MPUD Rev. 11/16/16 Cot lel Li01411I1r' Growth Management Department— Planning & Regulation Zoning Services Division November 15,2016 Bob Mulhere, FAICP Hole Montes 950 Encore Way Naples, Florida 34110 Re: Zoning Verification Letter ZLTR (CUD)-PL20160002442: Zoning Verification Letter–Comparable Use Determination for the Vincentian Village MPUD, 11480 Tamiami Trail East, located within in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,of unincorporated Collier County, Florida. Property ID/Folio: 00439880008. Dear Mr.Mulhere: This letter is in response to a Comparable Use Determination (CUD) Application dated September 12, 2016, which was submitted by you on the behalf of your client, Global Properties of Naples, LLC—Christopher Shucart, Manager. You have specifically requested a determination from the Zoning Manager and affirmation from the Office of the Hearing Examiner that the use of an indoor air-conditioned self-storage/mini-warehouse facility, Standard industrial Code (SIC#4225)greater than 65000 square feet of gross floor area is comparable in nature to those uses permitted to exceed 65,000 square feet of gross floor area, including group care facility, physical fitness facility, hotel, and department store, in Tract MU, Mixed-Use Development, under Section LB of the Vincentian Village MPUD,Ordinance No. 2015-33,as amended. Based upon staff's review of the current Official Zoning Atlas, an element of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Ordinance 04-41, as amended, I can confirm that the subject property has a zoning designation of the Vincentian Village MPUD. The permitted uses within this MPUD are listed in Exhibit A.I.B. Commercial Uses which includes the#64 reads as follows: any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC." In addition, you have compared the proposed use with the list of permitted uses approved in the Vincentian Village MPUD as follows: 1. The proposed Self-Storage/Mini-warehouse use, if limited to indoor air-conditioned only facility, is similar in nature to many of the other uses permitted in the subject PUD, in terms of building scale,and physical form. 2. The PUD allows a number of other uses which are also permitted in C-5 zoning and which are more intense in terms of traffic generation and many other potential impacts, including light, noise, and odor. These uses include,but are not limited to the following: • Auto and Home Supply Stores(5531); • Automotive services (7549) except that this shall not be construed to permit the activity of' wrecker service(towing)automobiles,road and towing service; • Department stores(531 1)- Permitted to exceed the PUD cap of 65,000 square feet; • Hospitals(8062); • Hotels(7011, hotel only), limited to 150 rooms- Permitted to exceed the PUD cap of 65,000 square feet; • Motion picture theaters(7832); PL20160002442 3. The air-conditioned self-storage/mini warehouse use is subject to the LDC architectural standards, including standards specifically applicable to this use(which address issues of compatibility). 4. The use is limited to indoor storage only. Lastly, you indicate have provided a traffic analysis of the trip generation of hotels (a permitted use within this MPUD)to an indoor air-conditioned self-storage use. This analysis indicates that a 150 room hotel is estimated to generate 1,334 daily trips, with 87 AM peak hour trips and 91 PM peak hour trips. In comparison, a 100,000 square foot indoor self-storage facility is estimated to generate 250 daily trips with only 14 AM peak hour and 25 PM peak hour trips.Thus, an indoor air-conditioned self-storage/mini-warehouse is a less intense trip generator. The Zoning Manager has reviewed the application and submittal documents and finds the argument made to be compelling. It has been concluded that an indoor air-conditioned self-storage/mini-warehouse is comparable and similar in nature to the other permitted uses within this MPUD and which may exceed 65,000 square feet of gross floor area, in terms of building scale, physical form, intensity and business character, but less intrusive than those uses in terms of traffic, noise, odors, solid waste generation, and lighting. Furthermore, compliance with the architectural, site-design, and landscaping requirements ensures that the facility will be similar in nature to the other listed PUD uses that are permitted to exceed 65,000 square feet. Therefore, staff confirms that an indoor air-conditioned self-storage/mini warehouse (SIC 4225) use is deemed to be comparable to the other permitted uses identified as permitted uses within the within the Vincentian Village MPUD and which are not subject to the maximum 65,000 square foot limitation. This determination must be affirmed by the Hearing Examiner to become valid;you will be notified of a hearing date. Disclaimer: Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. Please be advised that the information presented in this verification letter is based on the Collier County LDC and/or Growth Management Plan in effect as of this date. It is possible that subsequent amendment(s)to either of these documents could affect the validity of this verification letter. It is also possible that development of the subject property could be affected by other issues not addressed in this letter, such as, but not limited to, concurrency related to the provision of adequate public facilities,environmental impact,and other requirements of the Collier County LDC or related ordinances. Should you require additional information or have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact me at(239)252- 2463 or e-mail: raybellows@a colliergov.net. Researched and prepared by: Reviewed by: "44 Ray Bellows, Planning Manager Michael Bosi,AICP,Zoning Director Zoni Services Section Planning&Zoning Division C: Heidi Ashton-Cicko,Assistant County Attorney Annis Moxam, Addressing Section Ian Barnwell, PUD Monitoring PL20160002442 Co ewr County • COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 Zoning Verification Letter-Comparable Use Determination LDC sections 2.03.00 A, 10.02.06 J &Code of Laws section 2-83-2-90 Chapter 3 G.6 of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME PCUD-P120160002442 11480 Tamiami Trail East-Vincentian Village MPUD DATE PROCESSED Date: 9-19-2016 Due: 10-19-2016 PUD Zoning District Straight Zoning District APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION 1 Name of Applicant(s): Global Properties of Naples, LLC, Christopher Shucart,Manager Address: 2614 Tamiami Trail N., #615 City: Naples state: FL ZIP: 34103 Telephone: 239-435=0098 Cell: 239-435-0098 Fax: 239-289=3143 E-Mail Address: chris@jcsrealtygroup.corn •. i Name of Agent: Bob Mulhere, FAICP I Firm: Hole Montes Address: 950 Encore Way City: Naples State: Fl zip: 34110 Telephone: 239-254-2026 Cell: 239-825-9373 Fax: 239-254-2099 j E-Mail Address: bobmulhere@hmeng.com PROPERTY INFORMATION I Site Address: 11480 TAMIAMI TRL E Folio Number: 00439880008 Property Owners Name: Global Properties of Naples, LLC DETERMINATION REQUEST The determination request and justification for the use must be done by a certified land use planner or a land use attorney. Provide the completed request on a separate attached sheet. Please be very specific and include the SIC Code, if known. The request should adhere to the following format: "I request a determination from the Planning Manager and approval from the Office of the Hearing Examiner, that the use of 1'°°°'"`x4"444°"-81 n" is comparable and compatible with the • permitted uses in the vincenUan PUD or in the Straight Zoning District." 9/25/2014 Page 1 of 2 Attachment B Ca er Caunty COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST See Chapter 3 G.6 of the Administrative Code for submittal requirements. The following items are to be submitted with the application packet. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW #OF REQUIRED NOT COPIES REQUIRED • Completed Application (download current form from County 4 website) Determination request and the justification for the use 4 PUD Ordinance and Development Commitment information 4 • Electronic Copies of all documents *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all Q E [] materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. _ ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff,the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. • FEE REQUIREMENTS: ❑ Application: $1,000.00; Additional Fees of$100 per hour will be charged as needed upon completion of review and research. Payment of Additional Fees will be required prior to the release of the verification. ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner:$925.00 All checks payable to:Board of County Commissioners The completed application,all required submittal materials,and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN:Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples,FL 34104 /I'LI 1 (a ,• an - a Date Printed Name Please be advised that the zoning letter is based upon the available records furnished by Collier County and what was visible and accessible at the time of inspection. This report is based on the Land Development Code that is in effect on the date the report was prepared. Code regulations could be subject to change. While every attempt has been made to ensure the accuracy or completeness, and each subscriber to or user of this report understands that this department • disclaims any liability for any damages in connection with its use.In addition,this department assumes no responsibility for the cost of correcting any unreported conditions. 9/25/2014 Page 2 of 2 • LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND RUN SOUTH 02°48'46" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 32, A DISTANCE OF 1718.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 02°48'46" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 32, A DISTANCE OF 884.02 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32 AND THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS FORMERLY IN TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 94 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (VACATED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 189, PAGE 792); THENCE RUN NORTH 87°30'18" WEST ALONG SAID FORMER NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3 AND THE NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 4 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 103 OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 695.96 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 39°04'37" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 4 AND THE NORTH LINE • OF SAID TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3, A DISTANCE OF 1081.98 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD; THENCE RUN NORTH 50°56'59" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,A DISTANCE OF 1007.85 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL); THENCE RUN SOUTH 39°03'26" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 77.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE BEING CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3210.55 FEET,A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°34'44" AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 46°20'49" EAST, 814.73 FEET, RESPECTIVELY; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 816.93 FEET TO THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING. • AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) _'"'y 2 L i r CC40- et..zo I&opt.) Z11?1 (4Mr.hen G,1/en I, CAA•eY•f A•.c S (printname), j ,1 (title, if f�t4 D r.a �— as /�7�1w tt �iti.rc�P� applicable)of ?Li 5.. p/et. A) Lc,c,LLC (company, If a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the(dhoose one)owneriapplicant Jcontract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approvals) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application;and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize .4.1�- M,l A t. to act as our/my representative in any matters arding this thetition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pies. or v.pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company(LL.C.) or Limited Company(L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's"Managing Member" • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words"as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then • use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts . in it are e. (0/15 if gnature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER / The foregoing instrument w ;sworn to or affirmed)and subscribed before me on l 3( �� (date)by C44/1,74/P "'vGobeT (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification)as identification. A.)a•-ette, STAMP/SEAL Signature of Notary Public NARCISO DOkoNGO NOTARY PU&JC • ,-STATE OF FLORIDA f '• Comma FF192487 • Expires 91'912019 CP108-COA-001151155 REV 3/24/14 • September lb 2016 Ray Bellows,AICP,Planning and Zoning Manager Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples FL 34104 Re: Zoning Verification Letter Comparable Use Determination (ZVL-CUD for Indoor Air- Conditioned Self Storage—SIC Code 4225)within the Vincentian Village MPUD(Ord. 2015-33) Dear Mr. Bellows: Please find attached: (1) a completed ZVL-CUD Application; (2) a check in the amount of $1000.00 for the required fee;and(3)a copy of the Vincentian PUD Document. I know you are familiar with this MPUD,but to summarize, it was approved in 2015, along with a companion GMPA which established the Vincentian Subdistrict. Consistent with the provisions set forth in that Subdistrict and the PUD, in the event the PUD is developed as a "Mixed Use" PUD, commercial development is limited to a maximum of 10 acres and 128,000 square feet. The MPUD permits a number of commercial uses, generally comparable to uses as set forth in the C-3 and C-4 zoning districts. Uses include: restaurants, general and medical offices, a hotel(maximum • of 150 rooms), grocery stores, variety stores, home furniture and furnis1 ings stores, hospitals, household appliance stores, and numerous other commercial uses. The PUD limits any single use to 65,000 square feet of gross floor. area (GFA), with the exception of a group care facility, physical fitness facility, hotel, or department store, unless the single use is approved by the conditional use process outlined in the LDC. In addition to all of the uses expressly identified as permitted, the PUD also allows 'Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC." We are requesting a determination that Indoor Air-Conditioned Self Storage within the Vincentian MPUD is a"comparable and compatible"use, and therefore should be permitted. We are aware of several recent ZVL-CUD's (for PUD's)wherein the Indoor Air-conditioned Self Storage - SIC Code 4225 was found to be a "comparable and compatible"use. These include the Angileri PUD,the Sierra Meadows PUD, and the Gaspar PUD. Please note that the Angileri PUD allows both C-1 and C-2 uses, which are much less intense than the approved uses within the Vincentian Village MPUD. In each of these recently approved ZVL-CUD's the basis for approval include the following factors: Ray Bellows,AICP,Planning and Zoning Manager Re: ZVL-CUD Vincentian MPUD September 12,2016 Page Two The Self-Storage/Mini-warehouse use, if limited to indoor air-conditioned only, is similar in nature to many of the other use permitted in the respective PUD, in terms of building scale, and physical form, but less intrusive than many of those uses in terms of traffic, noise, odors, solid waste generation, and lighting. Compliance with the County's Architectural and Site Design Standard and landscaping requirements ensures that the facility will attractive. Looking just at traffic, a 150 room hotel is estimated to generate 1,334 daily trips, with 87 AM peak hour trips and 91 PM Peal hour trips. A 100,000 square foot indoor self-storage facility is estimated to generate 250 daily trips with only 14 AM peak hour and 25 PM peak hour trips. Specifically we are requested determination SIC Code 4225 limited to Indoor Air-Conditioned Self Storage is comparable to other uses identified as permitted within the Vincentian Village MPUD, and additionally, that this use would be also be deemed comparable to the other uses that are not subject to the maximum 65,000 square footage limitation. These include group care facilities,physical fitness facility,hotel, and department store. Please do not hesitate of contact me should you have any customs or require any additional information. Sincerely • Robert J.Mulhere,FAICP • cc: Christopher Shucart • • Page 2 of 2 • • ORDINANCE NO. 15- 33 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO A MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD,TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MAXIMUM OF 224 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, UP TO 250,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES, A HOTEL LIMITED TO 150 ROOMS, AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY (ALF) AT 0.6 FAR THE COMMERCIAL USES ARE SUBJECT TO CONVERSIONS AND LIMITATIONS IF THE PROJECT IS DEVELOPED AS MIXED USE OR IF A HOTEL OR ALF IS CONSTRUCTED. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND U.S. 41 IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, • RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 30.68+1- ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 99-37, THE VINCENTIAN PUD; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL20130001726) WHEREAS, Robert I Mulhere of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Global Properties of Naples,LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. P NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Southwest Boulevard and Tamiami Trail East (U.S. 41) in Section 32,Township 50 South,Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, is changed from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for a 30.68+1- acre project to be known as the Vincentian Village MPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 224 multifamily residential dwelling units, up to 250,000 gross square feet of commercial land uses, a hotel limited to 150 rooms, and an assisted living facility (ALF) at 0.6 FAR, in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached hereto and • incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps as described in [14-CPS-01292/1180260/11 141 Vincentian MPUD/PUDZ-PL20130001726 Page 1 oft Rev.5/15/15 ;CAS • Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. • SECTION TWO: Ordinance Number 99-37, known as the Vincentian Planned Unit Development, adopted on May 25, 1999 by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. • PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County 02, Commissioners of Collier County, Florida,this { day of it.t/LQ... ,2015. ATTEST• �- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWI0d1.$3QGK,CLERK COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA 44. : . _ iV.,q6 By: a , ; 1 k TIM NANCE,Chairman • • t Olgrianis signature 411 .. . Approved as to form and legality: Cit.) v-kf eidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A-Permitted Uses Exhibit B-Development Standards Exhibit C-Master Plan Exhibit C-1 —ROW Section Exhibit D- Legal Description This ordinance filed with the Exhibit E- Requested Deviations from LDC ry of St .'s Offi s Exhibit F-Developer Commitments J of ,J1-1 , and acknowledgerne�_ g sthat fill ived this (OT"'day ofBy 1.4.1e,Digutt..� • [14-CPS-01292/1180260/1] 14 1 Vincentian MPUD/P1JDZ-PL20130001726 Page 2 of 2 Rev.5/15/15 ) EXHIBIT A VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD • LIST OF PERMITTED USES PERMITTED USES: The PUD may be developed entirely as residential, entirely as commercial, or a mixture of • residential and commercial uses. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered, or used, or land used, in whole or in part, within the Vincentian Village MPUD, for other than the following: TRACT MU—MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT I. -Principal Uses A. Multifamily and Townhome residential uses, up to 224 dwelling units. Residential development shall be limited to market-rate and Gap Housing units. Gap Housing shall be provided in accordance with the conditions lind limitations set forth in Exhibit F. Developer Commitments,Paragraph VII,Gap Housing. B. Commercial Uses, subject to conversions in Exhibit B, Section III: Up to 250,000 square feet of gross floor area if the PUD is developed without residential dwelling • units. If the PUD is developed with residential and commercial uses, the commercial uses shall not exceed 10 acres in size and 128,000 square feet of gross floor area. No single use shall exceed 65,000 square-feet of gross floor area(GFA), with the exception of a group care facility, physical fitness facility, hotel, or department store, unless the single use is approved by the conditional use process outlined in the LDC. Commercial uses are further limited in this Section, 1.B. 1. Accounting, auditing,and bookkeeping(8721). 2. Advertising agencies(7311). 3. Amusement and recreation services, (7911, 7922, community theater only), (7933, 7991, 7999 - miniature golf course, bicycle and moped rental, and yoga only). A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of three(3)acres of the PUD. 4. Apparel and accessory stores(5611-5699). 5. Architectural services(8712). 6. Auto and home supply stores(5531). 7. Automotive services (7549) except that this shall not be construed to permit the activity of"wrecker service (towing) automobiles, road and towing service." No outdoor paging or amplified sound systems shall be used. 8. Banks, credit unions and trusts(6011-6099). 9. Barber shops(7241,except for barber schools). 10. Beauty shops(7231,except for beauty schools). 11. Business consulting services(8748). • Page 1 of 16 C:Wserslashton h\AppDatalLocallMicrotofttWindows\Temporary Internet Files1Content.OutlooIA5MIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx 12. Business credit institutions(6153-6159). • 13. Business services-miscellaneous (7311, 7322-7338, 7371-7379, 7384, 7389, except for except auctioneering service, automobile recovery, automobile repossession, batik work, bottle exchanges, bronzing, cloth cutting, contractors' disbursement, cosmetic kits, cotton inspection, cotton sampler, directories- telephone, drive-away automobile, exhibits-building, filling pressure containers, field warehousing, fire extinguisher, floats-decoration, folding and refolding, gas systems, bottle labeling, liquidation services, metal slitting and shearing, packaging and labeling, patrol of electric transmission or gas lines, pipeline or powerline inspection, press clipping service, product sterilization, recording studios, repossession service, rug binding, salvaging of damaged merchandise, scrap steel cutting and slitting, shrinking textiles, solvent recovery, sponging textiles, swimming pool cleaning, tape slitting, textile designers, textile folding, tobacco sheeting, window trimming,and yacht brokers). 14. Child day care services(8351). 15. Civic,social,and fraternal associations(8641). 16. Computer and computer software stores(5734). 17. Department stores (5311). Accessory fuel pumps for membership warehouse facilities subject to Section II,Accessory Uses,B.iv. 18. Drug stores(5912). 19. Eating and drinking places (5812 and 5813, excluding bottle clubs). All establishments engaged in the retail sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premise consumption are subject to the locational requirements of section 5.05.01. 20. Educational plants and services(8211,8221-8222). • 21. Essential services,subject to section 2.01.03 22. Food stores (groups 5411-5499). Accessory fuel pumps subject to Section II, Accessory Uses,B.iv. 23. Garment pressing,and agents for laundries and drycleaners(7212). 24. General merchandise stores(5331-5399). Accessory fuel pumps for membership warehouse facilities subject to Section II,Accessory Uses,B.iv. 25. Glass,Paint,and Wallpaper stores(5231).. 26. Group care facilities (category I and II, except for homeless shelters); care units, except for homeless shelters;nursing homes; assisted living facilities pursuant to F.S. § 429 and ch. 58A-5 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to F.S. § 651; as defined in the LDC and all subject to section 5.05.04. of the LDC (hereinafter collectively or singularly referred to as "Assisted Living Facility"). 27. Hardware stores(5251). 28. Health services,offices and clinics(8011-8049,8072, 8092,and 8099). 29. Home furniture and furnishings stores(5712-5719). 30. Home health care services(8082). 31. Hospitals(8062). 32. Hotels(7011,hotel only),limited to 150 rooms. 33. Household appliance stores(5722). 34. Insurance carriers,agents and brokers(6311-6399,6411). Page 2 of 16 • C:\Users\ashton JAAppDataocalltelicresoftWindowsViernporary Internet Files\ContenLOutlook\SMIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx 410 35. Landscape architects,consulting and planning(0781). 36. Legal services(8111). 37. Management services(8741, 8742). 38. Medical equipment rental and leasing(7352). 39. Membership organizations, miscellaneous (8611, 8699 - excluding Humane • society,animal). 40. Mortgage bankers and loan correspondents(6162). 41. Motion picture theaters(7832-except drive-in). 42. Museums and art galleries(8412). 43. Musical instrument stores(5736). 44. Nursing and personal care facilities(8051). 45. Photographic studios,portrait(7221). 46. Public administration(groups 9111-9199, 9229,9311, 9411,9451, 9511-9532, 9611-9661). 47. Public relations services(8743). 48. Radio,television and consumer electronics stores(5731). 49. Radio,television and publishers advertising representatives (7313). 50. Real Estate(6512,6531-6552). 51. Record and prerecorded tape stores (5735), excluding adult-oriented sales and rentals. 52. Religious organizations(8661)with 10,000 square feet or more of gross floor area in the principal structure. 53. Repair services, miscellaneous (7629-7631, 7699 - bicycle repair, binocular • repair, camera repair, key duplicating, lawnmower repair, leather goods repair, locksmith shop,picture framing,and pocketbook repair only). 54. Retail nurseries, lawn and garden supply stores(5261). 55. Retail services-miscellaneous (5921, 5941-5963 except pawnshops, 5992-5999 except auction rooms, awning shops, fireworks- retail, gravestones, hot tubs, monuments,swimming pools,tombstones and whirlpool baths). 56. Security and commodity brokers,dealer,exchanges and services (6211-6289). 57. Shoe repair shops and shoeshine parlors(7251). 58. Social services, individual and family (limited to 8322 activity centers for elderly or handicapped only;day care centers for adult and handicapped only). 59. Surveying services(8713). 60. Tax return preparation services(7291). 61. Travel agencies(4724,no other transportation services). 62. United State Postal Service(4311,except major distribution center). 63. Veterinary services(0742,excluding outside kenneling). 64. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. II. Accessory Uses: Page 3 of 16 CAUserslashton MAppDate\LocanMicrosoft\Windows1Temporary Internet FilessContent.Out1ookUMIUSZQB\PUP Document Final 5-15-15.docx 4.� Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures permitted by right in this MPUD,including,but not limited to: • A. Residential Accessory Uses: 1. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents of the PUD, such as swimming pools, tennis courts, bocce ball, volleyball courts, walking paths, picnic areas, dog parks,playgrounds,fitness centers,and recreation/amenity buildings. 2. Customary accessory uses and structures to residential units, including carports, garages,and utility buildings. 3. Temporary sales trailers and model units. 4. Entry gate and gatehouse. B. Commercial Accessory Uses: 1. Outside storage or display of merchandise when specifically permitted by the LDC for a use,subject to LDC Section 4.02.12. 2. One caretakers residence,subject to LDC Section 5.03.05. 3. Temporary display of merchandise during business hours provided it does not adversely affect pedestrian or vehicular traffic or public health or safety as determined by the County. Merchandise storage and display is prohibited within any front yard but allowed within the side and rear yards of lots. 4. Fuel pumps accessory to a grocery store or membership warehouse type facility, greater than 15,000 square feet of gross floor area,no closer than 300 feet to a residential use. 5. Fast food restaurants (with drive-through facilities), limited to two (2)restaurants. This limitation does not apply to coffees shops with on-site brewing. • III. Conditional Uses The following use is permissible as a conditional use,subject to the standards and procedures established in section 10.08.00. 1. Automotive vehicle dealers(5511), limited to new automobile dealers only. TRACT L—LAKE &WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES: PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof,shall be erected,altered, or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Storm water management treatment, conveyance facilities, and structures, such as berms,swales, and outfall structures. 2. Passive recreational facilities in support of residential and/or commercial uses or for use by the adjacent Hitching Post Mobile Home Park, including but not limited to boardwalks, trails, pervious pathways, picnic areas, and recreational shelters. Should Page 4 of 16 • cAuserskashton_mappoatal.ocanmiorosormindows\Temporary Internet FileslContentOudook15MUUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx r; such passive recreational facilities be developed, this shall not affect the maximum intensity or density permitted in this PUD. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. The stormwater lake depicted on the Master Plan (Tract L) shall be a minimum of 120 feet in width measured from the PUD boundary and inclusive of the perimeter landscape buffer easement and lake maintenance easement. TRACT P—PRESERVE: PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected,altered, or used,or land used, in whole or in part,for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Preservation of native habitat. B. Accessory Uses, allowed if additional acreage, above the minimum required, is provided in Tract P: • 1. Storm water management structures. 2. Pervious and impervious pathways and boardwalks, consistent with LDC Section 3.05.07 H.1.h.i. 3. Shelters without walls. 4. Educational signage and bulletin boards located on or immediately adjacent to the pathway. 5. Benches for seating. 6. Viewing platforms. 7. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. The minimum width of Tract P, or Tract P and the stormwater management lake (Tract L) in combination,as depicted on the Master Plan, shall be 65 feet. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY STANDARDS: Intensity of uses under any development scenario is limited to the two-way, unadjusted average weekday, pm peak hour trip entering/exiting generation of 1,107 total trips utilized in the TIS dated 10/18/13 (gross trips), allowing for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforeseen impacts on the adjacent roadway network. • Page 5 of 16 CAUserstiashton_h Appoata\LocaI\Microsoft\WindowATempornry Internet FileslContent.0udook\SMIuSZQ8\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx SfM( EXHIBIT B • VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for residential and commercial land uses. within Tract MU of the Vincentian Village MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. I. RESIDENTIAL& COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CLUBHOUSE! RECREATION MULTI-FAMILY TOWNHOUSE BUILDINGS COMMERCIAL PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES . MIN.LOT AREA 3,000 S.F.PER UNIT 1,800 S.F.PER UNIT N/A 10,000 S.F. MIN.LOT WIDTH 90 FEET 21 FEET N/A 100 FEET MIN.FLOOR AREA 1,250 S.F./D.U. 1,250 S.FJD.U. N/A 700 S.F.2 MINIMUM YARDS(External—measured from the PUD boundary)3 From Tamiami Trail and SW 50 FEET 50 FEET 50 FEET(Tamiami 50 FEET Blvd. Trail) 25 FEET(Southwest Blvd.) From adjacent RSF-4 zoned 75 FEET 75 FEET 75 FEET 75 FEET property From adjacent MH zoned 75 FEET 75 FEET 25 FEET 75 FEET property Fromm adjacent C-3 zoned 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET • ' property - MINIMUM YARDS(Internal—measured from internal lot lines) Min.Front Yard 20 FEET 4 20 FEET 4 20 FEET 10 FEET Min.Side Yard 15 FEET 0 or 10 FEET 15 FEET 10 FEET Min.Rear Yard 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 10 FEET Min.Preserve Setback 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET Min.Lake Setback S 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET MIN.DISTANCE BETWEEN 15 FT or i4 sum of 10 FT or'%BH, 10 FEET 20 FT or'Asum of STRUCTURES BH,whichever is whichever is greater BH,whichever is greater greater MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 45 FEET NOT TO EXCEED(ZONED) _ MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT 42 FEET 6 42 FEET 6 42 FEET 52 FEET 7 NOT TO EXCEED(ACTUAL) MAX.FAR N/A N/A N/A 0.6 MAX.GROSS FLOOR AREA N/A N/A N/A 250,000 SF 9 • ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FRONT _SPS SPS SPS SPS SIDE 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 5 FEET REAR 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 5 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET )0 FEET MIN.LAKE SETBACK 10 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT SPS SPS SPS SPS NOT TO EXCEED(ZONED) _ MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT SPS SPS SPS SPS NOT TO EXCEED(ACTUAL) _ 1. Defined as a group of three or more units. • Page 6 of 16 • C:\Users\ashton h1AppData\Local\Miwosot1 Windows\Temporary Internet FileslContent.Outlookl5MIUSZQB`PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx (.01‘C 2. Per principal structure,on the finished first floor,not applicable to Kiosks. 3. Dumpsters and dumpster enclosures shall not encroach into the stated perimeter PUD setbacks. 4. Front yards shall be measured as follows: — lithe parcel is served by a public right-of-way,setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. — If the parcel is served by a private road, setback is measured from the back of curb(if curbed)or edge of pavement(if not curbed). — If the parcel has frontage on two streets, the frontage providing vehicular access to The unit shall be considered the front yard.The other frontage shall be considered a side yard. — In no case shall the setback be less than 23 feet from the edge of an adjacent sidewalk,except in the case of side-loaded garages,designed such that a vehicle can be parked in the driveway in such a manner so as not to conflict with,or encroached upon,the adjacent sidewalk. 5. As measured from the Control Elevation. 6. Not to exceed two stories. 7. Commercial buildings located within 500 feet of US 41 may be developed at a building height of 50 feet zoned and 57 feet actual. 8. Applies to the following use:Assisted Living Facilities. 9, Subject to Land Use Conversion Factors,Exhibit B,Section III. 10. Zero feet if a 20'Lake Maintenance Easement is provided in a separate tract at time of platting. IL Design Standards A. Architectural Theme. i. All buildings, signage, landscaping, and visible architectural infrastructure shall be architecturally and aesthetically unified. Said unified architectural theme shall include: a similar architectural design and use of similar materials throughout all of the buildings, signs,and fences/walls to be erected on the subject parcel. • ii. Landscaping and streetscape materials shall also be similar in design throughout the subject site. An architectural plan shall be submitted concurrent with the first application for the Site Development Plan approval demonstrating compliance with these standards. B. Residential Amenities. The following amenities shall be provided in association with any residential development (other than a caretaker's residence), no later than issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the 92nd dwelling unit: i. Resort-style swimming pool. ii. Clubhouse. iii. Fitness center. iv. Dog park. v. Children's playground area/tot lot. vi. Tennis court or bocce ball court. vii. Gated entry. • viii. On-site property management if developed as a rental community. ix. Fence, wall or hedge along adjacent public right-of-way (i.e. Tamiami Trail and/or Southwest Boulevard, as applicable). When planting a hedge, it shall include decorative columns minimum of 24" x 48", spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a hedge a minimum of 30 inches in height at time of planting, that achieves 80 percent opacity and a minimum 4 feet in height within one year of planting. Page 7 of 16 C:1Userstashton_h\AppData\Local\MicrosottlWindowslTemporary Internet FilessContent.Outlook 5MIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx (:)s.0 i C. Residential Construction.For residential development, the following shall be required: i. Concrete Masonry.Unit construction and stucco, or approved equivalent. ii. Cement or slate tile roof or approved equivalent. iii. Minimum 9-foot ceiling heights within first-floor of units. iv. Concrete pavers at entrance/exit. III. Land Use Conversion Factors: A. Commercial Only Development: Commercial uses shall be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA), one hotel (maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted living facility (maximum FAR 0.6). Additionally, for every acre, or portion thereof, of hotel or Assisted Living Facility, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet or portion thereof for fractional amount under an acre. B. Mixed Use(Residential and Commercial)Development: The commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a maximum of 128,000 square feet of GFA of commercial uses, a 150-room hotel, and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0.6 FAR. Additionally, for every acre, or portion thereof,of hotel or Assisted Living Facility, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet or • portion thereof for fractional amount under an acre. Residential density shall be limited to a maximum density of 7.3 units per acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the property,exclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 224 multi-family and/or townhouse dwelling units. Page 8of16. C:Wserslashton MAppData\L.ocaMdierosoft\WindowslTemporary Internet FilcslContent.Outiookl5MIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx i dative Vegetation and Open Space " C-5 ZONING - Existing Native Vegetation. 29.77 Ac. GAS WHISTLER'S Min On-site Native Preservation Read • STATION 20'TYPE"0" • 29.77 x1614 w 4.49 Ac. COVE-PUD akin Open Space Req'd(Comm.ar Mixed-Use)30. LANDSCAPE Min 8 xOp n S Space R An .� BUFFER Min Open Space Required(Residential Only) � .�//N \ 30.68 xBON,-18.41 Ac 4‘;' // • O j/' 20'TYPE"0" �� '� TRAIL ACRES ,��' LANDSCAPE BUFFER DSAPE `\ % Gd 4 \`` e �o .m RSF-4 ZONING ye,'0 �44 / �� 44 'Qin �� l `'moo O � // \\ .• ,e 4, N TRACT "MU" •/ MIXED USE j<) \ \ • , • LANDSCAPE BUFFER EXISTING 16'U.E. PER LDC REQUIREMENTS ;:` EXISTING 16'U.E.-.4 0. •• DEVIATION#2 d n �` WALL LOCATION :IKE1PEO i ,. fir+a)11 z T n. U NTERCONNECTION ate• \, 15'TYPE"B" i i' °ti LANDSCAPE ► 2 `�e \• BUFFER 15'TYPE"B" ► W • LANDSCAPE aa. p BUFFER i O = g TRACT "P" I v o a �.� TRACT _ a PRESERVE „L" • Lund U..Surwaary t` EXISTING 16'U. \ LAK E aa Derip0on Acreage Percent Ai Mixed-Use(Tract MU) 22.06 71.9% • EXISTING 15'U.E. Lake(Tract L) 4,17 1$.6% • - _ Preserve(Tract P) 4.46 14.6% EXISTING 16'U.E. TOTAL 30.68 100.0% -a ter- r- TRAIL ACRES RSF-4 ZONING MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS:224 MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA:260,000 SF,SUBJECT TO LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS,SEE EXHIBIT B,SECTION III. • 1.13W1 :950(239Encorew.0 VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD ' ?, ;'J2`14 Naples,FL 34110 Pnoae.cxss)zs�-z000 MASTER PLAN *Ma. .1./2ot4 HOLE Certificate ofEXHIBITC we AelarimtlonNo1772 `R _0-2018 41, Page 9 of 16 C:luserslashton Mappnata'Locslwticrosoflwindows\TemporaryInternet Fii tentOutlook1SMIUSZQt3\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx (_. . ) nop3l-Es unj A r $ • .,,__� _es ._,f.,__n._,t.__�L_. _fl�__�_..�s_�0 ., • |li : �1 • ■ . O. o / ! �2 ) - 2 1 ' . 3). < #q 7 iI Pc15 k k - In ' • » \ . / / n � ; @ • . « q 7 \ _ �Jn : . z > I K \ ' ;\ =q ,< '4155• z I ;� _ 227z o 2 1 4.t.:-.123 ,• " T $ $ •SUPE p 1 1,,2 o I :§\} - m §4 P & & O ▪ 0 > \ $ . . \ G 6 ' i A E ¥ ¥ > P o / p \ g171 g m 7 � M 7J o i = * Z . o - � Z rn \ vk 0 -i Z / I o. a ¥� 2 . Z $ %.44.%4 § _ 0- . ! ` cit Aq p --� § < c 41t, I _ �� | 4 K P' & ' 3 C 2i | . 0 § ■ 0 • EXHIBIT D VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND RUN SOUTH 02°48'46" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 32, A DISTANCE OF 1718.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 02°48'46" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 32, A DISTANCE OF 884.02 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32 AND THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS FORMERLY IN TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 94 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 411) (VACATED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 189, PAGE 792); THENCE RUN NORTH 87°30'18" WEST ALONG SAID FORMER NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3 AND THE NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 4 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 103 OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 695.96 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 39°04'37" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 4 AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3, A DISTANCE OF 1081.98 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD; THENCE RUN NORTH 50°56'59" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1007.85 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL); THENCE RUN SOUTH 39°03'26" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 77.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE BEING CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3210.55 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°34'44" AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 46°20'49" EAST, 814.73 FEET, RESPECTIVELY; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 816.93 FEET TO THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING. Subject to easements,reservations or restrictions of record. • Page 11 of 16 C:1Users\ashton_h\AppData1Local\Microsoft\Windows1Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlookl5MIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx 1tir\ EXHIBIT E • VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation 1: From LDC Section 6.06.01.N, requiring a minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet for Iocal street rights-of-way, to allow for a minimum 42 foot right-of-way internal to the proposed development. Deviation 2: From LDC Section 5.03.02.H Wall requirement between residential and nonresidential development, which requires, wherever a . nonresidential development lies contiguous to a residentially zoned district, that a masonry wall, concrete or pre-fabricated concrete wall and/or fence be constructed on the nonresidential property, no less than 6 feet from the residentially zoned district, to allow the wall to be located more than 6 feet from the residentially zoned district, as generally depicted on Exhibit C,Master Plan. Deviation 3: From LDC Section 5.05.04.D.I Group Housing, which establishes a maximum floor area ratio of 0.45 for care units, assisted living units, continuing care retirement communities, nursing homes, and dwelling units that are part of an aging-in-place living environment,to allow a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6 for an Assisted Living Facility. • Page 12 of 16 • C:\Users\asltton h\AppData\Local\Microsoft\WindowstTemporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\SMIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx • EXHIBIT F VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the MPUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Global Properties of Naples, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document, to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the MPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity will not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the MPUD is closed out,then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. • IL ENVIRONMENTAL The site contains approximately 29.77 acres of native vegetation, of which approximately 37 )acres(11.12 ercentis covered with more than 75 percent exotic vegetation. For a P commercial or industrial project within the Coastal High Hazard Area, 15 percent of existing native vegetation must be retained (15% of 29.77 acres = 4.46 acres). The preserve as depicted on the Master Plan contains 4.46 acres. For a residential or mixed- use project within the Coastal High Ha?ard Area, the minimum required is 25 percent, or 7.44 acres (25% of 29.77 acres). Therefore, at time of site development, the developer. will either: A. Preserve all required native vegetation on-site (25% for residential only or mixed use, 15% for commercial only development),or B. Preserve a minimum of 15% of native vegetation on-site and mitigate for up to 2.98 acres (7.44 acres — 4.46 acres) of the on-site native vegetation preservation retention requirement off-site, either by monetary payment or by land donation, consistent with the provisions of the Vincentian Subdistrict of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan and Section 3.05.07 H.l.f of the Land Development Code. • Page 13 of 16 C:\Users\ashton_h\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files&Content.Outlook\5MIUSZQB\Pilo Document Final 5-15-15.docx III. TRANSPORTATION • A. Intensity of uses under any development scenario for the PUD is limited to the two-way, unadjusted, average weekday, pm peak hour trip entering/exiting generation of 1,107 total trips utilized in the TIS dated 10/18/13 (gross trips). B. Owner, its successor or assigns, shall convey a road right-of-way easement to Collier County, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, for the widening of Southwest Boulevard for the purpose of constructing turn-lane improvements to service the Subject Property if turn lane improvements are required as a result of the development. The easement shall be at no cost to Collier County and shall be for the same width and length as the turn-lane improvements being constructed to service the Subject Property. Any required turn-lane improvements at the intersection of Southwest Boulevard and Tamiami Trail East shall be exempt from the compensating ROW provision. Developer shall have the option, so long as the improvements meet Collier County standards and subject to County approval, to construct and relocate the existing County stormwater and utility improvements on the East side of SW boulevard onto the subject property in lieu of any compensating ROW easement. Drainage and utility easements to accommodate these improvements will be conveyed by Owner to the County, at no cost to the County, free of any encumbrances or liens. The utilities and stormwater to be relocated shall only be in the area where the required turn lane • improvements servicing the site are to be constructed. C. The owner and developer are responsible for actual construction costs associated with intersection improvements at Southwest Blvd. and U.S. 41 necessitated as a result of impacts from this development and proportionate share for signal upgrades. The owner and developer of Vincentian PUD are only responsible for modifications and intersection upgrades needed as a result of this development, which will not include any cost reimbursement for the traffic signal at Southwest Blvd. and US 41. IV. UTILITIES County water and sewer service is available via transmission mains located along US 41, Southwest Blvd and the eastern boundary of the subject property. The owner and developer are responsible for providing necessary connections to supply the site with County water and sewer service. V. PLANNING A. If the PUD is developed with residential uses only, the project will provide a minimum of 60 percent open space. Otherwise, the minimum open space shall be 30 percent. Page 14 of 16 • C:\Users\ashton_h\AppData1Local\Mierosoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook1SMJUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx } • B. The developer of any group housing or retirement community, its successors or assigns, shall provide the following services and be subject to the following operational standards for the units in the retirement community, including, but not limited to, independent living units,assisted living units,or skilled nursing units: Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care/housing facilities. These care/housing types are limited to independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing units, each of which can have varying operational characteristics. The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a senior housing care unit: i - I • The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; • There shall be on-site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on-site, or catered; • Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; • • There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; • An on-site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents; • Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; • Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. C. Landscape buffer easements (LBEs) are shown on the Master Plan within utility easements. At time of SDP, letters of no objection from all utility holders shall be obtained by owner or developer. If such approvals cannot be obtained, LBEs shall be relocated outside of utility easements. D. Tract P, Preserve, where it is dense enough to provide equivalent buffering per the LDC, may count towards minimum buffering requirements. The minimum width of Tract P, or Tract P and the stormwater management lake (Tract L) in combination,as depicted on the Master Plan, shall be 65 feet. SPage 15 of 16 C:1Users\ashton h1AppData\Lova Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\5MIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx E. A 15' Type B Landscape Buffer is required if residential development occurs on • the subject site adjacent to the Hitching Post Plaza property. F. The stormwater lake depicted on the Master Plan(Tract L) shall be a minimum of 120 feet in width measured from the PUD boundary and inclusive of the perimeter landscape buffer easement and lake maintenance easement. G. The Master Plan is conceptual in nature and is subject to modifications at time of Plans and Plat (PPL) or Site Development Plan (SDP) approval due to agency permitting requirements. H. For commercial uses, amplified sound shall not be permitted within 125 feet of the PUD perimeter boundary adjacent to RSF-4 or MH—Mobile Home zoning. In order to further buffer existing and potential new adjacent residential development from noise associated with amplified sound and outdoor dining areas, such areas shall be separated from existing and potential new adjacent residential development by the principal commercial structure and shall not break the side plane of the building. Amplified sound of any type shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 11:00 PM. These restrictions do not apply to drive-through ordering devices. Any deviation from this standard shall be approved by the conditional use process outlined in the LDC. I. If developed as mixed-use or commercial, at time of the first Site Development . Plan, the developer shall provide, to the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and cross-access agreements. VI. (EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT If more than 92 dwelling units are constructed, the developer shall provide, prior_ to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the 93"I dwelling unit, a new, quiet-running, extended run-time towable 45kw (minimum-kw) generator per Emergency Management's specifications. The towable generator will be a one-time developer contribution based on the number of units permitted at time of SDP to meet the hurricane mitigation impact for evacuation concerns. The generator specifications must be pre- approved by the Department of Emergency Management as the County has certain inter- operable standards and required safety options. VII. GAP HOUSING The Developer shall provide Gap Housing in accordance with the GAP Housing Agreement between the Board of Collier County Commissioners and the Developer. Page 16 of 16 • C:\tJsers\ashtnn h1AppDatx\Local\MicrosoftlWindows\Temporary Internet Files lContent.OuUook\SMIUSZQBPUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx i r`y is , ,h Gw of+ ` FLORIDA DEPARTMENT of STATE RICK SCOTT KEN DETZNER Governor Secretary of State June 16,2015 Honorable Dwight E. Brock Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County Post Office Box 413044 Naples,Florida 34101-3044 Attention:Anne Jennejohn, Deputy Clerk • Dear Mr.Brock: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes,this will acknowledge receipt of your electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 15-33,which was filed in this office on June 16,2015. Sincerely, Ernest L.Reddick Program Administrator ELR/lb • R.A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850)245-6270 • Facsimile: (850)488-9879 www.dos.state.fl.us Teresa L. Cannon From: Crotteau, Kathynell Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2016 12:11 PM To: Minutes and Records; Patricia L. Morgan Subject: FW: 12-8-16 HEX Meeting (Revised Agenda Item 4-A) Attachments: A_Vincentian Village_revised 113016_ZLTR_CUD_PL20160002442.pdf Attached please find revised Agenda Item 4-A for the 12-8-16 HEX meeting. .Cathy Crotteam Legal-Secretary Office of the Collier County.attorney and .Tearing Examiners Office 2800 91/orthflorseslioe Drive, Suite 301 Na_pies,JL 34104 Phone: (239)252-8400 katliynellcrotteauAcollergov.net From: CrotteauKathynell Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 3:51 PM To: 'minutesandrecords@collierclerk.com'; Patricia L. Morgan Subject: 12-8-16 HEX Meeting Attached is the complete packet for the December 8, 2016 HEX meeting. .Cathy Crotteau, Legal-Secretary Office (!f-the Colter County.attorney and. -learing examiners Office 2800.Arorth 9lorseshoe Drive, Suite 301 ..IVa_pl s,XL 34104 Phone: (239)252-8400 kathynellcrotteaugcollergov.net Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send electronic mail to this entity.Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing. 1 AGENDA ITEM 4-A Collier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING: DECEMBER 8, 2016 SUBJECT: ZLTR (CUD)-PL20160002442, VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MIXED-USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(MPUD) APPLICANT/AGENT: Applicant: Global Properties of Naples, LLC 2614 Tamiami Trail N., #615 Naples, FL 34103 Agent: Bob Mulhere, FAICP Hole Montes 950 Encore Way Naples, FL 34110 REQUESTED ACTION: The Applicant wishes to have the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) affirm a zoning verification letter issued by the Planning and Zoning Division pursuant to LDC Section 10.02.06, in which County staff determined that the proposed use of indoor air conditioned self-storage/mini-warehouse (SIC 4225) greater than 65,000 square feet of gross floor area is comparable in nature to those uses permitted to exceed 65,000 square feet of gross floor area, including group care facility, physical fitness facility, hotel, and department store, in Tract MU, Mixed-Use Development, under Section I.B of the Vincentian Village MPUD, Ordinance No. 2015-33,as amended. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at the southeast corner of Southwest Boulevard and U.S. 41 in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of±30.68 acres. ZLTR(CUD)-PL20160002442 Page 1 of 5 Vincentian Village MPUD Rev. 11/21/16 I SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: Subject: Vincentian Village Mixed-Use Planned Unit Development(MPUD) North: Tamiami Trail East Right-of-Way (ROW)and then Whistlers Cove PUD East: Mobile Home Zoning South: Residential Single-family (RSF-4)zoning West: Residential Single-family, RSF-4 and Heavy Commercial District(C-5) ti . I41:AL_le,' ' ♦ '1' / ' •,\. - I Subject "} Edi Property w 1' < ** p iii, , I .10: t ek . ,..�, k !- ! •' ' Santa re TAL F Sir 4kI 4 ` s- :writ; ,d� � y OMr�TR�7 CaRvf Courcyp,p,-r f.,a • 4.,:. _ 1111' 1F'^T - - . J 1 t AI Aerial Photo (Collier County Property Appraiser) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Applicant seeks a determination that an indoor air-conditioned, self-storage/mini- warehouse, Standard Industrial Code (SIC) 4225, greater than 65,000 square feet of gross floor area is comparable in nature to those uses permitted to exceed 65,000 square feet of gross floor area, including group care facility, physical fitness facility, hotel, and department store, in Tract MU, Mixed-Use Development, under Section I.B of the Vincentian Village MPUD, Ordinance No. 2015-33, as amended. The applicant requested a Zoning Verification Letter (ZLTR) from the Planning & Zoning Director on September 12, 2016. The Director issued a ZLTR stating that an indoor air- conditioned self-storage/mini warehouse (SIC 4225) use is comparable to the other permitted uses identified as permitted uses within the within the Vincentian Village MPUD ZLTR(CUD)-PL20160002442 Page 2 of 5 Vincentian Village MPUD Rev. 11/21/16 and which are not subject to the maximum 65,000 square foot limitation. This hearing is to seek affirmation of that opinion by the HEX. It should be noted that this petition was continued from the November 10, 2016 HEX meeting to allow the applicant time to clarify the application to request a determination that an indoor air-conditioned, self-storage/mini- warehouse, greater than 65,000 square feet of gross floor area is comparable in nature to those uses permitted to exceed 65,000 square feet of gross floor area. ANALYSIS: LDC Section 10.02.06 J.1.b, Comparable Use Determinations, states the following: "The County Manager or Designee may issue a zoning verification letter to determine whether a use within a PUD is consistent and compatible with the surrounding uses within the PUD. To be effective, the zoning verification letter shall be approved by the BCC by resolution, at an advertised public hearing." The BCC delegated this duty to the Hearing Examiner through Ordinance 2013-25. Based upon staff's review of the current Official Zoning Atlas, an element of the Collier County Land Development Code(LDC), Ordinance 04-41, as amended,staff has confirmed that the subject property has a zoning designation of the Vincentian Village MPUD. The permitted uses within this MPUD are listed in Exhibit A.I.B. Commercial Uses which includes the #64 reads as follows: "any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC." Staff has compared the proposed use with the list of permitted uses approved in the Vincentian Village MPUD as follows: 1. The proposed Self-Storage/Mini-warehouse use, if limited to indoor air-conditioned only facility, is similar in nature to many of the other uses permitted in the subject PUD, in terms of building scale, and physical form. Such uses include a hotel and department store with greater than 65,000 square feet of gross floor area. 2. The PUD allows a number of other uses which are also permitted in C-5 zoning and which are more intense in terms of traffic generation and many other potential impacts, including light, noise, and odor. These uses include, but are not limited to the following: • Auto and Home Supply Stores(5531); • Automotive services(7549)except that this shall not be construed to permit the activity of'wrecker service(towing)automobiles,road and towing service; • Department stores(5311)-Permitted to exceed the PUD cap of 65,000 square feet; • Hospitals(8062); • Hotels(7011,hotel only), limited to 150 rooms-Permitted to exceed the PUD cap of 65,000 square feet; • Motion picture theaters(7832); ZLTR(CUD)-PL20160002442 Page 3 of 5 Vincentian Village MPUD Rev. 11/21/16 3. The air-conditioned self-storage/mini warehouse use is subject to the LDC architectural standards, including standards specifically applicable to this use(which address issues of compatibility). 4. The use is limited to indoor storage only. The petitioner has submitted a traffic analysis that compares the trip generation of hotels, greater than 65,000 square feet of gross floor area(a permitted use within this MPUD)to an indoor air-conditioned self-storage use. This analysis indicates that a 150 room hotel is estimated to generate 1,334 daily trips, with 87 AM peak hour trips and 91 PM peak hour trips. In comparison, a 100,000 square foot indoor self-storage facility is estimated to generate 250 daily trips with only 14 AM peak hour and 25 PM peak hour trips. Staff concurs with the finding that an indoor air-conditioned self-storage/mini-warehouse is a less intense trip generator. Based upon above analysis, the use of an indoor air-conditioned self-storage/ mini storage use is comparable and similar in nature to the other permitted uses within this MPUD and which may exceed 65,000 square feet of gross floor area, in terms of building scale, physical form,intensity and business character,but less intrusive than those uses in terms of traffic, noise,odors, solid waste generation, and lighting. Furthermore,compliance with the architectural, site-design, and landscaping requirements ensures that the facility will be similar in nature to the other listed PUD uses and those uses that are permitted to exceed 65,000 square feet of gross floor area. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on 11/28/2016. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner affirm the opinions of the Zoning Manager that the use of an air-conditioned self-storage/mini warehouse (SIC 4225) is comparable and compatible to other permitted commercial uses within Section I.B of the Vincentian Village MPUD,Ordinance 15-33. Attachments: A. Zoning Verification Letter B. Application ZLTR(CUD)-PL20160002442 Page 4 of 5 Vincentian Village MPUD Rev. 11/21/16 PREPARED BY: 77 ?) / -"/" ---------- ti /30/q, RAYMD V. BELLOWS,ZONING MANAGER DATE 7,ON DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: -2 -/II‘ °. .. A- 3.7 _ /G, MICHAEL BOSI,AICP, DIRECTOR DATE PLANNING&ZONING DIVISION ZLTR(CUD)-PL20160002442 Page 5 of 5 Vincentian Village MPUD Rev. 11/21/16 ie C:0141407 • Growth Management Department— Planning & Regulation Zoning Services Division November 15, 2016 Bob Mulhere, FAICP Hole Montes 950 Encore Way Naples,Florida 34110 Re: Zoning Verification Letter ZLTR (CUD)-PL20160002442; Zoning Verification Letter– Comparable Use Determination for the Vincentian Village MPUD, 11480 Tamiami Trail East, located within in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,of unincorporated Collier County, Florida. Property ID/Folio: 00439880008. Dear Mr. Mulhere: This letter is in response to a Comparable Use Determination (CUD) Application dated September 12, 2016, which was submitted by you on the behalf of your client, Global Properties of Naples, LLC—Christopher Shucart, Manager. You have specifically requested a determination from the Zoning Manager and affirmation from the Office of the Hearing Examiner that the use of an indoor air-conditioned self-storage/mini-warehouse facility, Standard Industrial Code(SIC#4225)greater than 65000 square feet of gross floor area is comparable in nature to those uses permitted to exceed 65,000 square feet of gross floor area, including group care facility, • physical fitness facility, hotel, and department store, in Tract MU, Mixed-Use Development, under Section I.B of the Vincentian Village MPUD,Ordinance No. 2015-33,as amended. Based upon staff's review of the current Official Zoning Atlas, an element of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC), Ordinance 04-41, as amended, I can confirm that the subject property has a zoning designation of the Vincentian Village MPUD. The permitted uses within this MPUD are listed in Exhibit A.I.B. Commercial Uses which includes the#64 reads as follows: "any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC." In addition, you have compared the proposed use with the list of permitted uses approved in the Vincentian Village MPUD as follows: 1. The proposed Self-Storage/Mini-warehouse use, if limited to indoor air-conditioned only facility, is similar in nature to many of the other uses permitted in the subject PUD, in terms of building scale,and physical form. 2. The PUD allows a number of other uses which are also permitted in C-5 zoning and which are more intense in terms of traffic generation and many other potential impacts, including light, noise, and odor. These uses include, but are not limited to the following: • Auto and Home Supply Stores(5531); • Automotive services (7549) except that this shall not be construed to permit the activity of' wrecker service(towing)automobiles, road and towing service; • Department stores(5311)-Permitted to exceed the PUD cap of 65,000 square feet; • • Hospitals(8062); • Hotels(7011,hotel only), limited to 150 rooms-Permitted to exceed the PUD cap of 65,000 square feet; • Motion picture theaters(7832); PL20160002442 3. The air-conditioned self-storage/mini warehouse use is subject to the LDC architectural standards, including standards specifically applicable to this use(which address issues of compatibility). is4. The use is limited to indoor storage only. Lastly, you indicate have provided a traffic analysis of the trip generation of hotels (a permitted use within this MPUD)to an indoor air-conditioned self-storage use. This analysis indicates that a 150 room hotel is estimated to generate 1,334 daily trips, with 87 AM peak hour trips and 91 PM peak hour trips. In comparison, a 100,000 square foot indoor self-storage facility is estimated to generate 250 daily trips with only 14 AM peak hour and 25 PM peak hour trips. Thus, an indoor air-conditioned self-storage/mini-warehouse is a less intense trip generator. The Zoning Manager has reviewed the application and submittal documents and finds the argument made to be compelling. It has been concluded that an indoor air-conditioned self-storage/mini-warehouse is comparable and similar in nature to the other permitted uses within this MPUD and which may exceed 65,000 square feet of gross floor area, in terms of building scale, physical form, intensity and business character, but less intrusive than those uses in terms of traffic, noise, odors, solid waste generation, and lighting. Furthermore, compliance with the architectural, site-design, and landscaping requirements ensures that the facility will be similar in nature to the other listed PUD uses that are permitted to exceed 65,000 square feet. Therefore, staff confirms that an indoor air-conditioned self-storage/mini warehouse(SIC 4225) use is deemed to be comparable to the other permitted uses identified as permitted uses within the within the Vincentian Village MPUD and which are not subject to the maximum 65,000 square foot limitation. This determination must be affirmed by the Hearing Examiner to become valid;you will be notified of a hearing date. Disclaimer: Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or • fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law. All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. Please be advised that the information presented in this verification letter is based on the Collier County LDC and/or Growth Management Plan in effect as of this date. It is possible that subsequent amendment(s)to either of these documents could affect the validity of this verification letter. It is also possible that development of the subject property could be affected by other issues not addressed in this letter, such as, but not limited to, concurrency related to the provision of adequate public facilities,environmental impact,and other requirements of the Collier County LDC or related ordinances. Should you require additional information or have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact me at(239)252- 2463 or e-mail: raybellows@colliergov.net. Researched and prepared by: Reviewed by: Ray •• I Be ows, Planning Manager Michael Bosi,AICP, Zoning Director Zoni : Services Section Planning&Zoning Division C: Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Assistant County Attorney Annis Moxam,Addressing Section Ian Barnwell, PUD Monitoring • PL20160002442 SJ&9 !ntY • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 Zoning Verification Letter-Comparable Use Determination LDC sections 2.03.00 A, 10.02.061 &Code of Laws section 2-83-2-90 Chapter 3 G.6 of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER PCUD-PL20160002442 PROJECT NAME 11480 Tamiami Trail East-Viincentian Vdlage MPUD DATE PROCESSED Date: 9-19-2016 Due:10-19-2016 ✓ PUD Zoning District Straight Zoning District APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Global Properties of Naples, LLC, Christopher Shucart,Manager Address: 2614 Tamiami Trail N., #615 city: Naples State: FL zip: 34103 Telephone: 239-435=0098 Cell: 239435-0098 Fax: 239-289=3143 E-Mail Address: chris@jcsrealtygroup.com Name of Agent:: Bob Mulhere, FAICP Firm: Hole Montes Address: 950 Encore Way city: Naples State: FI zip: 34110 Telephone: 239-254-2026 cell: 239-825-9373 Fax: 239-254-2099 E-Mail Address: bobmulhere@hmeng.com PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address: 11480 TAMIAMI TRL E Folio Number: 00439880008 Property Owners Name: Global Properties of Naples, LLC DETERMINATION REQUEST The determination request and justification for the use must be done by a certified land use planner or a land use attorney. Provide the completed request on a separate attached sheet. Please be very specific and include the SIC Code, if known. The request should adhere to the following format: "I request a determination from the Planning Manager and approval from the Office of the Hearing Examiner, that the use of"°°°'43"—P-51 4"s is comparable and compatible with the • permittedVincenUan uses in the PUD or in the Straight Zoning District." 9/25/2014 Page 1 of 2 Attachment B Ca er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE111 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST See Chapter 3 G.6 of the Administrative Code for submittal requirements. The following items are to be submitted with the application packet. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED • Completed Application (download current form from County ❑ ❑ ❑ website) Determination request and the justification for the use 4 _ ❑ PUD Ordinance and Development Commitment information ❑ Electronic Copies of all documents *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all Q ❑ 0 materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff,the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. • FEE REQUIREMENTS: ❑ Application: $1,000.00; Additional Fees of$100 per hour will be charged as needed upon completion of review and research. Payment of Additional Fees will be required prior to the release of the verification. ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner:$925.00 All checks payable to:Board of County Commissioners The completed application,all required submittal materials,and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples,FL 34104 yo"-- CVI'L./ 1 (A • Date L. —:‘,4111.04•2.. Printed Name Please be advised that the zoning letter is based upon the available records furnished by Collier County and what was visible and accessible at the time of inspection. This report is based on the Land Development Code that is in effect on the date the report was prepared. Code regulations could be subject to change. While every attempt has been made to ensure the accuracy or completeness, and each subscriber to or user of this report understands that this department disclaims any liability for any damages in connection with its use. In addition,this department assumes no responsibility for the cost of correcting any unreported conditions. 9/25/2014 Page 2 of 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION i A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND RUN SOUTH 02°48'46" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 32, A DISTANCE OF 1718.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 02°48'46" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 32, A DISTANCE OF 884.02 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32 AND THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS FORMERLY IN TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 94 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (VACATED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 189, PAGE 792); THENCE RUN NORTH 87°30'18" WEST ALONG SAID FORMER NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3 AND THE NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 4 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 103 OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 695.96 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 39°04'37" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 4 AND THE NORTH LINE . OF SAID TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3,A DISTANCE OF 1081.98 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD; THENCE RUN NORTH 50°56'59" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1007.85 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL); THENCE RUN SOUTH 39°03'26" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 77.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE BEING CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3210.55 FEET,A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°34'44" AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 46°20'49" EAST, 814.73 FEET, RESPECTIVELY; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 816.93 FEET TO THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING. • AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) ..`,,,hr,, 2 LTA a(40)- rt-2o i f.oav 2Y1� (/�,��f/�4 6/4 L• / iss4D I, C AA.,y f it er S 14.4��C-�--��(print name), as /'?P/,9e(, 4/4e-1,04/ (title, if applicable)of y t e 6".(('N fvf a �"/J•-# kc LLG (company, If a licable), swear or affirm under oath,that I am the(dhoose one)ownerlQ applicantcontract purchaserAand that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application;and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize.6,4 .- a..I A.c� to act as our/my representative in any matters arding thistetition including (f rough 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then itis usually executed by the corp.pies. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company(L.L.C.) or Limited Company(LC.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's"Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner"of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words"as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts t in it are e. (O/i ,/(f gnature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER jplThe foregoing instryment was,sworn to(or affirmed)and subscribed before me on I3/IL (date) by C,hiry fjf&.�/ SN,VGoN/'f— (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification)as identification. STAMP/SEAL Signature of Notary Public NARCISO DOMINGO NOTARY PUSUC :-STATE OF FLORIQA i,�,•tt ;" Cann*FF1924s7 • • Expires 3/9/2019 CP108-COA-001151155 REV 3/24/14 • September 1.6i,2016 Ray Bellows, AICP,Planning and Zoning Manager Collier County Growth Management Division 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples FL 34104 Re: Zoning Verification Letter Comparable Use Determination (ZVL-CUD for Indoor Air- Conditioned Self Storage—SIC Code 4225)within the Vincentian Village MPUD(Ord. 2015-33) Dear Mr. Bellows: Please fmd attached: (1) a completed ZVL-CUD Application; (2) a check in the amount of $1000.00 for the required fee; and(3)a copy of the Vincentian PUD Document. I know you are familiar with this MPUD,but to summarize, it was approved in 2015, along with a companion GMPA which established the Vincentian Subdistrict. Consistent with the provisions set forth in that Subdistrict and the PUD, in the event the PUD is developed as a "Mixed Use" PUD,commercial development is limited to a maximum of 10 acres and 128,000 square feet. The MPUD permits a number of commercial uses, generally comparable to uses as set forth in the C-3 and C-4 zoning districts. Uses include: restaurants, general and medical offices, a hotel(maximum • of 150 rooms), grocery stores, variety stores, home furniture and furnishings stores, hospitals, household appliance stores, and numerous other commercial uses. The PUD limits any single use to 65,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA), with the exception of a group care facility, physical fitness facility, hotel, or department store, unless the single use is approved by the conditional use process outlined in the LDC. In addition to all of the uses expressly identified as permitted, the PUD also allows 'Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC." We are requesting a determination that Indoor Air-Conditioned Self Storage within the Vincentian MPUD is a"comparable and compatible"use, and therefore should be permitted. We are aware of several recent ZVL-CUD's (for PUD's) wherein the Indoor Air-conditioned Self Storage - SIC Code 4225 was found to be a"comparable and compatible"use. These include the Angileri PUD, the Sierra Meadows PUD, and the Gaspar PUD. Please note that the Angileri PUD allows both C-1 and C-2 uses, which are much less intense than the approved uses within the Vincentian Village MPUD. In each of these recently approved ZVL-CUD's the basis for approval include the following factors: • I ' Ray Bellows,AICP,Planning and Zoning Manager Re: ZVL-CUD Vincentian MPUD September 12,2016 Page Two The Self-Storage/Mini-warehouse use, if limited to indoor air-conditioned only, is similar in nature to many of the other use permitted in the respective PUD, in terms of building scale, and physical form, but less intrusive than many of those uses in terms of traffic, noise,.odors, solid waste generation, and lighting. Compliance with the County's Architectural and Site Design Standard and landscaping requirements ensures that the facility will attractive. Looking just at traffic, a 150 room hotel is estimated to generate 1,334 daily trips, with 87 AM peak hour trips and 91 PM Peal hour trips. A 100,000 square foot indoor self-storage facility is estimated to generate 250 daily trips with only 14 AM peak hour and 25 PM peak hour trips. Specifically we are requested determination SIC Code 4225 limited to Indoor Air-Conditioned Self Storage is comparable to other uses identified as permitted within the Vincentian Village MPUD, and additionally, that this use would be also be deemed comparable to the other uses that are not subject to the maximum 65,000 square footage limitation. These include group care facilities,physical fitness facility,hotel, and department store. Please do not hesitate of contact me should you have any customs or require any additional information. Sincerely • • Robert J. Muihere,FAICP cc: Christopher Shucart • S Page 2 of 2 ORDINANCE NO. 15- 3 3 • AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO A MIXED USE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (MPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS THE VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD,TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A MAXIMUM OF 224 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS, UP TO 250,000 GROSS SQUARE FEET OF COMMERCIAL LAND USES, A HOTEL LIMITED TO 150 ROOMS, AND AN ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY (ALF) AT 0.6 FAR. THE COMMERCIAL USES ARE SUBJECT TO CONVERSIONS AND LIMITATIONS IF THE PROJECT IS DEVELOPED AS MIXED USE OR IF A HOTEL OR ALF IS CONSTRUCTED. THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD AND U.S. 41 IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, • RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 30.68+/- ACRES; PROVIDING FOR THE REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 99-37, THE VINCENTIAN PUD; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PUDZ-PL201300017261 WHEREAS, Robert J. Mulhere of Hole Montes, Inc., representing Global Properties of Naples,LLC,petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described real property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,that: SECTION ONE: The zoning classification of the herein described real property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of Southwest Boulevard and Tamiami Trail East (U.S. 41) in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida,is changed from a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Zoning District to a Mixed Use Planned Unit Development (MPUD) Zoning District for a 30.68+/- acre project to be known as the Vincentian Village MPUD, to allow construction of a maximum of 224 multifamily residential dwelling units, up to 250,000 gross square feet of commercial land uses, a hotel limited to 150 rooms, and an assisted living • facility (ALF) at 0.6 FAR, in accordance with Exhibits A through F attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps as described in [14-CPS-01292/1180260/1] 141 Vincentian MPUD/PUDZ-P L20130001726 Page 1 of 2 Rev.5/15/15 L• • Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. • SECTION TWO: Ordinance Number 99-37, known as the Vincentian Planned Unit Development,adopted on May 25, 1999 by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. •PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida,this day of ...TtAA... ,2015. A 1'1'>;ST, l�• BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIIt. . QGK,CLERK COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA • 5 : . By: r' ' 4 k TIM NANCE,Chairman • signature only.. Approved as to font)and legality: clo eidi Ashton-Cicko `� Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments:Exhibit A-Permitted Uses Exhibit B -Development Standards Exhibit C-Master Plan Exhibit C-I —ROW Section Exhibit D-Legal Description This ordinance filed with the Exhibit E- Requested Deviations from LDC ry of Sgte`s Office Exhibit F- Developer Commitments of 111 V�,.g01 and acknowledgernec j,that fill . ,lved this day ofBy(.L � . [14-CPS-01292/1180260/1) 141 Vincentian MPUD/PUDZ-PL20130001726 Page 2 of 2 Rev.5/15/15 Cp EXHIBIT A VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD • LIST OF PERMITTED USES PERMITTED USES: The PUD may be developed entirely as residential, entirely as commercial, or a mixture of residential and commercial uses. No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered,or used, or land used, in whole or in part, within the Vincentian Village MPUD,for other than the following: TRACT MU—MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT I. • Principal Uses A. Multifamily and Townhome residential uses, up to 224 dwelling units. Residential development shall be limited to market-rate and Gap Housing units. Gap Housing shall be provided in accordance with the conditions and limitations set forth in Exhibit F. Developer Commitments,Paragraph VII,Gap Housing. B. Commercial Uses, subject to conversions in Exhibit B, Section III: Up to 250,000 square feet of gross floor area if the PUD is developed without residential dwelling • units. If the PUD is developed with residential and commercial uses, the commercial uses shall not exceed 10 acres in size and 128,000 square feet of gross floor area. No single use shall exceed 65,000 square.feet of gross floor area(GFA), with the exception of a group care facility, physical fitness facility, hotel, or department store, unless the single use is approved by the conditional use process outlined in the LDC. Commercial uses are further limited in this Section, T.B. 1. Accounting,auditing,and bookkeeping(8721). 2. Advertising agencies(7311). 3. Amusement and recreation services, (7911, 7922, community theater only), (7933, 7991, 7999 - miniature golf course, bicycle and moped rental, and yoga only). A recreational site for the use of the adjacent RV or mobile home parks may be developed on a maximum of three(3)acres of the PUD. 4. Apparel and accessory stores(5611-5699). 5. Architectural services(8712). 6. Auto and home supply stores(5531). 7. . Automotive services (7549) except that this shall not be construed to permit the activity of"wrecker service (towing) automobiles, road and towing service." No outdoor paging or amplified sound systems shall be used. 8. Banks,credit unions and trusts(6011-6099). 9. Barber shops (7241,except for barber schools). 10. Beauty shops(7231,except for beauty schools). 11. Business consulting services(8748). • Page 1 of 16 C:\Users\eshton h\AppDatetLocal1Mierosoft‘Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.OutlooklSMIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx 12. Business credit institutions(6153-6159). • 13. Business services-miscellaneous (7311, 7322-7338, 7371-7379, 7384, 7389, except for except auctioneering service, automobile recovery, automobile repossession, batik work, bottle exchanges, bronzing, cloth cutting, contractors' disbursement, cosmetic kits, cotton inspection, cotton sampler, directories- telephone, drive-away automobile, exhibits-building, filling pressure containers, field warehousing, fire extinguisher, floats-decoration, folding and refolding, gas systems, bottle labeling, liquidation services, metal slitting and shearing, packaging and labeling, patrol of electric transmission or gas lines, pipeline or powerline inspection, press clipping service, product sterilization, recording studios, repossession service, rug binding, salvaging of damaged merchandise, scrap steel cutting and slitting, shrinking textiles, solvent recovery, sponging textiles, swimming pool cleaning, tape slitting, textile designers, textile folding, tobacco sheeting,window trimming,and yacht brokers). 14. Child day care services(8351). 15. Civic,social,and fraternal associations(8641). 16. Computer and computer software stores(5734). 17. Department stores (5311). Accessory fuel pumps for membership warehouse facilities subject to Section II,Accessory Uses, B.iv. 18. Drug stores(5912). 19. Eating and drinking places (5812 and 5813, excluding bottle clubs). All establishments engaged in the retail sale of alcoholic beverages for on-premise consumption are subject to the locational requirements of section 5.05.01. 20. Educational plants and services(8211, 8221-8222). • , 21. Essential services,subject to section 2.01.03 22. Food stores (groups 5411-5499). Accessory fuel pumps subject to Section II, Accessory Uses,B.iv. 23. Garment pressing, and agents for laundries and drycleaners(7212). 24. General merchandise stores(5331-5399). Accessory fuel pumps for membership warehouse facilities subject to Section II,Accessory Uses, B.iv. 25. Glass,Paint,and Wallpaper stores(5231).. 26. Group care facilities (category I and II, except for homeless shelters); care units, except for homeless shelters; nursing homes; assisted living facilities pursuant to F.S. § 429 and ch. 58A-5 F.A.C.; and continuing care retirement communities pursuant to F.S. § 651; as defined in the LDC and all subject to section 5.05.04.of the LDC (hereinafter collectively or singularly referred to as "Assisted Living Facility"). 27. Hardware stores(5251). 28. Health services,offices and clinics(8011-8049,8072, 8092,and 8099). 29. Home furniture and furnishings stores(5712-5719). 30. Home health care services(8082). 31. Hospitals(8062). 32. Hotels(7011,hotel only),limited to 150 rooms. 33. Household appliance stores(5722). 34. Insurance carriers,agents and brokers(6311-6399,6411). Page 2 of 16 C:wscrskasnwn_hlAppatatLocariMicrosort1Windowffemaorar'Immo F'ks\contu,couaookl5M1USZQs1PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx • 35. Landscape architects,consulting and planning(0781). 36. Legal services(8111). 37. Management services(8741, 8742). 38. Medical equipment rental and leasing(7352). 39. Membership organizations, miscellaneous (8611, 8699 - excluding Humane society,animal). 40. Mortgage bankers and loan correspondents(6162). 41. Motion picture theaters(7832-except drive-in). 42. Museums and art galleries(8412). 43. Musical instrument stores(5736). 44. Nursing and personal care facilities(8051). 45. Photographic studios,portrait(7221). 46. Public administration(groups 9111-9199, 9229, 9311, 9411, 9451, 9511-9532, 9611-9661). 47. Public relations services (8743). 48. Radio,television and consumer electronics stores(5731). 49. Radio,television and publishers advertising representatives(7313). 50. Real Estate(6512, 6531--6552). 51. Record and prerecorded tape stores (5735), excluding adult-oriented sales and rentals. 52. Religious organizations(8661)with 10,000 square feet or more of gross floor area in the principal structure. 53. Repair services, miscellaneous (7629-7631,' 7699 - bicycle repair, binocular • repair, camera repair, key duplicating, lawnmower repair, leather goods repair, locksmith shop,picture framing,and pocketbook repair only). 54. Retail nurseries,lawn and garden supply stores(5261). 55. Retail services -miscellaneous (5921, 5941-5963 except pawnshops,5992-5999 except auction rooms, awning shops, fireworks- retail, gravestones, hot tubs, monuments,swimming pools,tombstones and whirlpool baths). 56. Security and commodity brokers, dealer,exchanges and services (6211-6289). 57. Shoe repair shops and shoeshine parlors (7251). . 58. Social services, individual and family (limited to 8322 activity centers for elderly or handicapped only; day care centers for adult and handicapped only). 59. Surveying services(8713). 60. Tax return preparation services(7291). 61. Travel agencies(4724,no other transportation services). 62. United State Postal Service(4311, except major distribution center). 63. Veterinary services(0742,excluding outside kenneling). 64. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. II. Accessory Uses: IPPage 3 of 16 CAUsers\ashton IMPpDatoU.ocahMicrosoltWindows1Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook15M1USZQB\PUD Document Anal 5-15-15.docx •Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures permitted by right in this MPUD, including,but not limited to: A. Residential Accessory Uses: 1. Recreational uses and facilities that serve the residents of the PUD, such as swimming pools, tennis courts, bocce ball, volleyball courts, walking paths, picnic areas, dog parks,playgrounds, fitness centers, and recreation/amenity buildings. 2. Customary accessory uses and structures to residential units, including carports, garages, and utility buildings. 3. Temporary sales trailers and model units. 4. Entry gate and gatehouse. B. Commercial Accessory Uses: 1. Outside storage or display of merchandise when specifically permitted by the LDC for a use,subject to LDC Section 4.02.12. 2. One caretakers residence, subject to LDC Section 5.03.05. 3. Temporary display of merchandise during business hours provided it does not adversely affect pedestrian or vehicular traffic or public health or safety as determined by the County. Merchandise storage and display is prohibited within any front yard but allowed within the side and rear yards of lots. 4. Fuel pumps accessory to a grocery store or membership warehouse type facility,greater than 15,000 square feet of gross floor area,no closer than 300 feet to a residential use. 5. Fast food restaurants (with drive-through facilities), limited to two (2) restaurants. This • limitation does not apply to coffees shops with on-site brewing. III. Conditional Uses - The following use is permissible as a conditional use, subject to the standards and procedures established in section 10.08.00. 1. Automotive vehicle dealers(5511), limited to new automobile dealers only. TRACT L—LAKE& WATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES: PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered, or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Storm water management treatment, conveyance facilities, and structures, such as berms,swales,and outfall structures. 2. Passive recreational facilities in support of residential and/or commercial uses or for use by the adjacent Hitching Post Mobile Home Park, including but not Iimited to boardwalks, trails, pervious pathways, picnic areas, and recreational shelters. Should Page 4 of 16 • c:w:erslashton_h\AppDati ocallMioosoft1windows1TemvoraryInternaFil Conunt.oudooklSMtlSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx f.,; such passive recreational facilities be developed, this shall not affect the maximum intensity or density permitted in this PUD. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals or the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. The stormwater lake depicted on the Master Plan (Tract L) shall be a minimum of 120 feet in width measured from the PUD boundary and inclusive of the perimeter landscape buffer easement and lake maintenance easement. TRACT P—PRESERVE: PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected,altered, or used, or land used, in whole or in part,for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Preservation of native habitat. B. Accessory Uses, allowed if additional acreage, above the minimum required, is provided in Tract P: 1. Storm water management structures. • 2. Pervious and impervious pathways and boardwalks, consistent with LDC Section 3.05.07 H.l.h.i. 3. Shelters without walls. 4. Educational signage and bulletin boards located on or immediately adjacent to the pathway. 5. Benches for seating. 6. Viewing platforms. 7. Any other use which is comparable in nature with the forgoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Hearing Examiner by the process outlined in the LDC. The minimum width of Tract P, or Tract P and the stormwater management lake (Tract L) in combination,as depicted on the Master Plan,shall be 65 feet. DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY STANDARDS: Intensity of uses under any development scenario is limited to the two-way, unadjusted average weekday, pm peak hour trip entering/exiting generation of 1,107 total trips utilized in the TIS dated 10/18/13 (gross trips), allowing for flexibility in the proposed uses without creating unforeseen impacts on the adjacent roadway network. • Page 5 of 16 C:1Userslashton h\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\SMIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx (0 7. EXHIBIT B • VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The table below sets forth the development standards for residential and commercial land uses. within Tract MU of the Vincentian Village MPUD. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. I. RESIDENTIAL & COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS CLUBHOUSE/ RECREATION MULTI-FAMILY TOWNHOUSE t BUILDINGS COMMERCIAL . PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES ` MIN.LOT AREA 3,000 S.F.PER UNIT ' 1,800 S.F.PER UNIT N/A 10,000 S.F. MIN.LOT WIDTH 90 FEET 21 FEET N/A 100 FEET MIN.FLOOR AREA 1,250 S.F./D.U. 1,250 S.FJD.U. N/A 700 S.F.2 MINIMUM YARDS(External–measured from the PUD boundary)3 From Tamiami Trail and SW 50 FEET 50 FEET 50 FEET(Tamiami 50 FEET Blvd. Trail) 25 FEET(Southwest Blvd.) From adjacent RSF-4 zoned 75 FEET 75 FEET 75 FEET 75 FEET property From adjacent MH zoned 75 FEET 75 FEET 25 FEET 75 FEET property From adjacent C-3 zoned 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET • property MINIMUM YARDS(Internal—measured from internal lot lines) Min.Front Yard 20 FEET 4 20 FEET 4 20 FEET 10 FEET Min.Side Yard 15 FEET 0 or 10 FEET 15 FEET 10 FEET Min.Rear Yard 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 10 FEET Min.Preserve Setback 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET Min.Lake Setbacks 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET 20 FEET MIN.DISTANCE BETWEEN 15 FT or''Asum of 10 FT or'A BH, 10 FEET 20 FT or Va sum of STRUCTURES BH,whichever is whichever is greater BH,whichever is mate, greater MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 45 FEET NOT TO EXCEED(ZONED) MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT 42 FEET 6 42 FEET 6 42 FEET 52 FEET 7 NOT TO EXCEED(ACTUAL) MAX.FAR N/A N/A N/A 0.6 a MAX.GROSS FLOOR AREA N/A N/A N/A _ 250,000 SF 9 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FRONT SPS SPS SPS SPS SIDE 10 FEET 10 FEET _ 10 FEET 5 FEET REAR 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 5 FEET PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET JO FEET MIN.LAKE SETBACK'° 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT SPS SPS SPS SPS NOT TO EXCEED(ZONED) , MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT SPS SPS SPS SPS NOT TO EXCEED(ACTUAL) I. Defined as a group of three or more units. Page 6 of 16 • C:Wserslashton_MAppDatALocanMicrosoffiWindows\Temporary tntemet FilestContentOutlookl5M1USZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx c)C L • 2. Per principal structure,on the finished first floor,not applicable to Kiosks. 3. Dumpsters and dumpster enclosures shall not encroach into the stated perimeter PUD setbacks. 4. Front yards shall be measured as follows: — If the parcel is served by a public right-of-way,setback is measured from the adjacent right-of-way line. — If the parcel is served by a private road,setback is measured from the back of curb(if curbed)or edge of pavement(if not curbed). — If the parcel has frontage on two streets, the frontage providing vehicular access to the unit shall be considered the front yard.The other frontage shall be considered a side yard. — In no case shall the setback be less than 23 feet from the edge of an adjacent sidewalk,except in the case of side-loaded garages,designed such that a vehicle can be parked in the driveway in such a manner so as not to conflict with,or encroached upon,the adjacent sidewalk. 5. As measured from the Control Elevation. 6. Not to exceed two stories. 7. Commercial buildings located within 500 feet of US 41 may be developed at a building height of 50 feet zoned and 57 feet actual. 8. Applies to the following use:Assisted Living Facilities. 9. Subject to Land Use Conversion Factors,Exhibit B,Section III. 10. Zero feet if a 20'Lake Maintenance Easement is provided in a separate tract at time of platting. H. Design Standards A. Ardhitectural Theme. i. All buildings, signage, landscaping, and visible architectural infrastructure shall be architecturally and aesthetically unified. Said unified architectural theme shall include: a similar architectural design and use of similar materials throughout all of the buildings, signs, and fences/walls to be erected on the subject parcel. • ii. Landscaping and streetscape materials shall also be similar in design throughout the subject site. An architectural plan shall be submitted concurrent with the first application for the Site Development Plan approval demonstrating compliance with these standards. B. Residential Amenities. The following amenities shall be provided in association with any residential development (other than a caretaker's residence), no later than issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the 92nd dwelling unit: i. Resort-style swimming pool. ii. Clubhouse. iii. Fitness center. iv. Dog park. v. Children's playground area/tot lot. vi. Tennis court or bocce ball court. vii. Gated entry. viii. On-site property management if developed as a rental community. ix. Fence, wall or hedge along adjacent public right-of-way (i.e. Tamiami Trail and/or Southwest Boulevard, as applicable). When planting a hedge, it shall include decorative columns minimum of 24" x 48", spaced no more than 30 feet on center, and a hedge a minimum of 30 inches in height at time of planting, that achieves 80 percent opacity and a minimum 4 feet in height within one year of planting. Page 7 of-16 C:\Users\ashton_h\AppDatalLocallMicrosothWindows\Temporary Internet Files\ContenLOutlookl5MIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx IIP C. Residential Construction.For residential development,the following shall be required: i. Concrete Masonry. Unit construction and stucco, or approved equivalent. ii. Cement or slate tile roof or approved equivalent. iii. Minimum 9-foot ceiling heights within first-floor of units. iv. Concrete pavers at entrance/exit. • M. Land Use Conversion Factors: A. Commercial Only Development: Commercial uses shall be limited to a maximum of 250,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA), one hotel (maximum of 150 rooms), and an assisted living facility (maximum FAR 0.6). Additionally, for every acre, or portion thereof, of hotel or Assisted Living Facility, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet or portion thereof for fractional amount under an acre. B. Mixed Use(Residential and Commercial) Development: The commercial portion of the project shall not exceed 10 acres in size and a maximum of 128,000 square feet of GFA of commercial uses, a 150-room hotel, and an Assisted Living Facility at a 0.6 FAR. Additionally, for every acre, or portion thereof, of hotel or Assisted Living Facility, the maximum allowable commercial GFA shall be reduced by 10,000 square feet or • portion thereof for fractional amount under an acre. Residential density shall be limited to a maximum density of 7.3 units per acre, calculated on the gross acreage of the property, exclusive of any commercial portions, for a maximum of 224 multi-family and/or townhouse dwelling units. Page 8 of 16. • C:\Users\ashton h\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windowa\Terriporary Internet Files\ContenLOutlook\SMIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx .1!iative Vegetation and Open Space �• C-5 ZONING . Existing Native Vegetation• 29.77 Ac. GAS WHISTLER'S Min Oneeite Native Preeervetion Req'd STATION 20'TYPE"D" • 29.77x16%-4.48Ac. COVE-PUD Min Open Space Req'd(Comm.ar Mixed-Use) LANDSCAPE 90.68x30)i a9.20Aa \ Min Open Space Required(Residential Only) 4d� , .,//..\BUFFER `.68 x 60%-18.41 Ac J.. P j ‘ • f >#ce-x ,....//20'TYPE"D" �` �1 `. TRAIL ACRES • �v� '� LANDSCAPE ` •• G 44 ZONING 5� A BUFFER �` �°' `�,� ��4\♦ .jp OJ \ s. , 4, ••• N. < N TRACT "MU" , , _)/ MIXED USE §N., N y ♦ • • LANDSCAPE BUFFER 1 EXISTING 15'U.E. PER LDC REQUIREMENTS r.;' EXISTING 15'U.E.�+ a • \ DEVIATION#2 II o WALL LOCATION 'a I' ' ' ' 11 s • :IKEIPED 4frtia�ck U • 0� • �� 15'TYPE"B" _' °+ LANDSCAPE i �'' BUFFER 15'TYPE"B" i w w • ' LANDSCAPE '1 a O �� BUFFER 1 , Z w ti ♦ i J a •\ TRACT "P" , 1 o PRESERVE TRACT 1 = • Land Use Sumrn • EXISTING 15'U. .' LAKE 1 Description Acreage Percent Mixed-Use(Tract MU) 22.06 71.9% EXISTING 15'U.E. Lake(Treat L) 4,17 19.8% • _ _ Preserve(Treat P) 4.40 14.5% TOTAL 90.68 100.0% `_+ EXISTING 15'U.E. TRAIL ACES RSF-4 ZONING MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS:224 MAXIMUM GROSS FLOOR AREA:250,000 SF,SUBJECT TO LAND USE CONVERSION FACTORS,SEE EXHIBIT B,SECTION III. 1 ,050 pies Fore Way' VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD ,ti' ' I l` NMINaples.FL.94110 t9t a"'r 1/ 14 Phone:(230)254.2000 MASTER PLAN °IMIC.w. c"vzou HOLE MON TES Florida Certificate of "' AWharl:anonNo.1772 EXHIBIT C -ass-2018 IIIPage 9 of 16 c:\usersushton_h AppDatalLoca11MicrosOft\windows\TempOrary Internet Files\Content.Oudook\SMIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx i,• w 6 Ii . ILI 0 1c1 in �% d ,i\i ---- --L_ `,- ref , t Az w �I\ i-- Z r— % In Q /��/ 4 Z Z 0 t7j %`�/i Q <V U I � vW\. o 11 W F W .k./• Z ~_ Q U m 14: t z3 o S NO X cW LCL W S 3C W I = t. o2 3 Co LLQ I I\\i Q LW X .9•:%• ? CI jai w 1. 0 , v, .4 b S i 02 o 3 7�r a '� o I LIJ d A Z W Z II. 1N. ; z 5 Ccc L 3 6 Q `' Q z �i W u, wci u, 1 II 21; , . gE > ::, ..., a < rt et. s * f\// ....7 N ki VI 02 po • A 4 /\\ I- N Z sM s ,�: < VI 5,. • •..••,w.♦..u.• .••VNu.1•Y.wW.u-O•.•WWN•....NV••01 I Vu•'gn.wJ N•I II •Su•aM1..Au•...•.V4 ONO.VI•••V4.11,-•4•/V VV .r V•.•....•.•S.•O. 5-15-15.docx 4111 EXHIBIT D VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION A parcel of land located in Section 32, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND RUN SOUTH 02°48'46" WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 32, A DISTANCE OF 1718.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL) AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 02°48'46" WEST ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 32, A DISTANCE OF 884.02 FEET TO THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32 AND THE NORTH LINE OF LOTS FORMERLY IN TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 94 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA • (VACATED BY INSTRUMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 189, PAGE 792); THENCE RUN NORTH 87°30'18" WEST ALONG SAID FORMER NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3 AND THE NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 4 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 103 OF SAID PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, A DISTANCE OF 695.96 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 39°04'37" WEST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF TRAIL ACRES UNIT 4 AND THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRAIL ACRES UNIT 3, A DISTANCE OF 1081.98 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SOUTHWEST BOULEVARD; THENCE RUN NORTH 50°56'59" EAST ALONG SAID EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1007.85 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF U.S. HIGHWAY NO. 41 (TAMIAMI TRAIL); THENCE RUN SOUTH 39°03'26" EAST ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 77.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE BEING CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3210.55 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 14°34'44" AND A CHORD BEARING AND DISTANCE OF SOUTH 46°20'49" EAST, 814.73 FEET, RESPECTIVELY; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE AND THE SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE, AN ARC DISTANCE OF 816.93 FEET TO THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING. Subject to easements, reservations or restrictions of record. 411 Page 11 of 16 • CAUserslashton h\AppData1L.ocalWierosoft\Windows\Temporary Internet Files\Content.Outlook\SMIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx EXHIBIT E VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD W LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC Deviation 1: From LDC Section 6.06.01.N, requiring a minimum right-of-way width of 60 feet for local street rights-of-way, to allow for a minimum 42 foot right-of-way internal to the proposed development. Deviation 2: From LDC Section 5.03.02.H Wall requirement between residential and nonresidential development, which requires, wherever a nonresidential development lies contiguous to a residentially zoned district, that a masonry wall, concrete or pre-fabricated concrete wall and/or fence be constructed on the nonresidential property,no less than 6 feet from the residentially zoned district, to allow the wall to be located more than 6 feet from the residentially zoned district,as generally depicted on Exhibit C,Master Plan. Deviation 3: From LDC Section 5.05.04.D.1 Group Housing, which establishes a maximum floor area ratio of 0.45 for care units, assisted living units, continuing care retirement communities, nursing homes, and dwelling units that are part of an aging-in-place living environment,to allow a maximum floor area ratio of 0.6 for an Assisted Living Facility. Page 12 of 16 • CAUserslashton_h1AppDattALocalWicrosoR\Windows\Temporary Internet riles\ContentOutlook\5MIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx CF/ • EXHIBIT F VINCENTIAN VILLAGE MPUD LIST OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS PUD MONITORING One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD,and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the MPUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Global Properties of Naples, LLC. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document, to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff; and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the MPUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity will not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the MPUD is closed out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. II: ENVIRONMENTAL The site contains approximately 29.77 acres of native vegetation,of which approximately 37 percent (11.12 acres) is covered with more than 75 percent exotic vegetation. For a commercial or industrial project within the Coastal High Hazard Area, 15 percent of existing native vegetation must be retained (15% of 29.77 acres = 4.46 acres). The preserve as depicted on the Master Plan contains 4.46 acres. For a residential or mixed- use project within the Coastal High Hazard Area, the minimum required is 25 percent,or 7.44 acres (25% of 29.77 acres). Therefore, at time of site development, the developer. will either: A. Preserve all required native vegetation on-site(25% for residential only or mixed use, 15% for commercial only development),or B. Preserve a minimum of 15% of native vegetation on-site and mitigate for up to 2.98 acres (7.44 acres — 4.46 acres) of the on-site native vegetation preservation retention requirement off-site, either by monetary payment or by land donation, consistent with the provisions of the Vincentian Subdistrict of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan and Section 3.05.07 H.l.f of the Land Development Code. • Page 13 of 16 C:1Users1ashton_h1AppData1Local\Microsoft WindowsVTemporary Internet FileslContent.Outlook15MIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx ti`.i III. TRANSPORTATION • A. Intensity of uses under any development scenario for the PUD is limited to the two-way, unadjusted, average weekday, pm peak hour trip entering/exiting generation of 1,107 total trips utilized in the TIS dated 10/18/13 (gross trips). B. Owner, its successor or assigns, shall convey a road right-of-way easement to Collier County, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances, for the widening of Southwest Boulevard for the purpose of constructing turn-lane improvements to service the Subject Property if turn lane improvements are required as a result of the development. The easement shall be at no cost to Collier County and shall be for the same width and length as the turn-lane improvements being constructed to service the Subject Property. Any required turn-lane improvements at the intersection of Southwest Boulevard and Tamiami Trail East shall be exempt from the compensating ROW provision. Developer shall have the option, so long as the improvements meet Collier County standards and subject to County approval, to construct and relocate the existing County stormwater and utility improvements on the Eastside of SW boulevard onto the subject property in lieu of any compensating ROW easement. Drainage and utility easements to accommodate these improvements will be conveyed by Owner to the County, at no cost to the County, free of any encumbrances or liens. The utilities and stormwater to be relocated shall only be in the area where the required turn lane • improvements servicing the site are to be constructed. C. The owner and developer are responsible for actual construction costs associated with intersection improvements at Southwest Blvd. and U.S. 41 necessitated as a result of impacts from this development and proportionate share for signal upgrades. The owner and developer of Vincentian PUD are only responsible for modifications and intersection upgrades needed as a result of this development, which will not include any cost reimbursement for the traffic signal at Southwest Blvd. and US 41. IV. UTILITIES County water and sewer service is available via transmission mains located along US 41, Southwest Blvd and the eastern boundary of the subject property. The owner and developer are responsible for providing necessary connections to supply the site with County water and sewer service. V. PLANNING A. If the PUD is developed with residential uses only, the project will provide a minimum of 60 percent open space. Otherwise, the minimum open space shall be 30 percent. Page 14 of 16 • c:\Userslashton_hwppDatalL•oceNw;croson1windowffemporary Internet Files\contentOutlook\5MIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx • • B. The developer of any grouphousingor retirement community, its successors or assigns, shall provide the following services and be subject to the following operational standards for the units in the retirement community, including,but not limited to,independent living units, assisted living units,or skilled nursing units: Operational Characteristics for Senior Housing Senior housing may be composed of one or more types of care/housing facilities. These care/housing types are limited to independent living, assisted living, and skilled nursing units, each of which can have varying operational characteristics. The following characteristics of senior housing care units distinguish them from residential land uses, and all of the characteristics must be provided for and maintained to be considered a senior housing care unit: • The facility shall be for residents 55 years of age and older; • There shall be on-site dining facilities to the residents, with food service being on-site,or catered; • Group transportation services shall be provided for the residents for the purposes of grocery and other types of shopping. Individual transportation services shall be coordinated for the residents needs, including but not limited to medical office visits; . • There shall be an onsite manager/activities coordinator to assist residents who shall be responsible for planning and coordinating stimulating activities for the residents; • An on-site wellness facility shall provide exercise and general fitness opportunities for the residents; • Each unit shall be equipped with devices provided to notify emergency service providers in the event of a medical or other emergency; • Independent living units shall be designed so that a resident is able to age in place. For example, kitchens may be easily retrofitted by lowering the sink to accommodate a wheelchair bound resident or bathrooms may be retrofitted by adding grab bars. C. Landscape buffer easements (LBEs) are shown on the Master Plan within utility easements. At time of SDP, letters of no objection from all utility holders shall be obtained by owner or developer. If such approvals cannot be obtained, LBEs shall be relocated outside of utility easements. D. Tract P,Preserve,where it is dense enough to provide equivalent buffering per the LDC, may count towards minimum buffering requirements. The minimum width of Tract P, or Tract P and the stormwater management lake (Tract L) in combination,as depicted on the Master Plan, shall be 65 feet. • Page 15 of 16 C:Wsecs\ashton_h\AppData\Locel\Microsoft\Windowsgemporary Intcmet Files ContentOutlook\SMIUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx E. A 15' Type B Landscape Buffer is required if residential development occurs on • the subject site adjacent to the Hitching Post Plaza property. F. The stormwater lake depicted on the Master Plan(Tract L) shall be a minimum of 120 feet in width measured from the PUD boundary and inclusive of the perimeter landscape buffer easement and lake maintenance easement. G. The Master Plan is conceptual in nature and is subject to modifications at time of Plans and Plat (PPL) or Site Development Plan (SDP) approval due to agency permitting requirements. H. For commercial uses, amplified sound shall not be permitted within 125 feet of the PUD perimeter boundary adjacent to RSF-4 or.MH—Mobile Home zoning. In order to further buffer existing and potential new adjacent residential development from noise associated with amplified sound and outdoor dining areas, such areas shall be separated from existing and potential new adjacent residential development by the principal commercial structure and shall not break the side plane of the building. Amplified sound of any type shall be limited to the hours of 7:00 AM to 11:00 PM. These restrictions do not apply to drive-through ordering devices. Any deviation from this standard shall be approved by the conditional use process outlined in the LDC. I. If developed as mixed-use or commercial, at time of the first Site Development • Plan, the developer shall provide, to the maximum extent feasible, internal connectivity through shared parking and cross-access agreements. VI. :EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT If more than 92 dwelling units are constructed, the developer shall provide, prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the 9314 dwelling unit, a new, quiet-running, extended run-time towable 45kw (minimum-kw) generator per Emergency Management's specifications. The towable generator will be a one-time developer contribution based on the number of units permitted at time of SDP to meet the hurricane mitigation impact for evacuation concerns. The generator specifications must be pre- approved by the Department of Emergency Management as the County has certain inter- operable standards and required safety options. VII. GAP HOUSING The Developer shall provide Gap Housing in accordance with the GAP Housing Agreement between the Board of Collier County Commissioners and the Developer. Page 16of16 • C:\Users\ashton h1AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temponuy Internet Files\Content.Outlook\SMfUSZQB\PUD Document Final 5-15-15.docx i FLORIDA DEPARTMENT 0 STATE RICK SCOTT KEN DETZNER Governor Secretary of State June 16,2015 Honorable Dwight E.Brock Clerk of the Circuit Court Collier County Post Office Box 413044 Naples,Florida 34101-3044 Attention:Anne Jennejohn,Deputy Clerk Dear Mr.Brock: Pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.66, Florida Statutes,this will acknowledge receipt of your electronic copy of Collier County Ordinance No. 15-33,which was filed in this office on June 16,2015. Sincerely, I • Ernest L.Reddick Program Administrator ELR/lb • R.A. Gray Building • 500 South Bronough Street • Tallahassee, Florida 32399-0250 Telephone: (850)245-6270 • Facsimile: (850)488-9879 www.dos.state.fl.us AGENDA ITEM 4-B Cott ier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER(HEX) FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING: DECEMBER 8, 2016 SUBJECT: ZLTR (CUD)-PL20160002571, CITY GATE COMMERCE PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PUD) APPLICANT/AGENT: Applicant: Hulett Environmental Services 7670 Okeechobee Boulevard West Palm Beach, FL 33411 Agent: Tim Hancock, AICP Stantec Consulting Services, Inc. 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd., Suite 300 Naples, FL 34108 REQUESTED ACTION: The Applicant wishes to have the Collier County Hearing Examiner(HEX) affirm a zoning verification letter issued by the Planning and Zoning Division pursuant to Section 10.02.06 of the Land Development Code (LDC), in which County staff determined that the proposed use of a pest control and extermination business, Standard Industrial Code (SIC) #7342 is comparable in nature to other permitted principal uses in the area described as "Both East and West of the Florida Power & Light Easement" under Section 3.2(A) of the City Gate Commerce Park PUD, Ordinance No. 88-93,as amended. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located at the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard (CR-951) and City Gate Drive in Section 35, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida,consisting of±287 acres. ZLTR(CUD)-PL20160002571 (Rev 11-28-16) Page 1 of 5 City Gate Commerce Park PUD SURROUNDING LAND USE& ZONING: Subject: City Gate Commerce Park Planned Unit Development(PUD) North: City Gate Commerce Park Planned Unit Development(PUD) East: White Lake Boulevard Right-of--Way (ROW) and then Agriculture Zoning, Water Treatment Plant South: City Gate Drive,then City Gate Commerce Park PUD West: Collier Boulevard ROW and then Golden Gate Commerce Park PUD . } 4. } Subject Property \irka r N 72 i '(_. �+ '# ; ' i. ..�... Gnrr Dore a gW. a Aerial Photo(Collier County Property Appraiser) PURPOS-E/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Applicant seeks a determination that a pest control and extermination business, Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) #7342, is comparable and compatible use with the permitted principal uses in the City Gate Commerce Park PUD, Ordinance 88-93, as amended which are bout east and west of the Florida Power& Light Easement(FPL). The applicant requested a Zoning Verification Letter (ZLTR) from the Planning Manager on September 27, 2016. The Planning Manager issued a ZLTR stating that the use of a Pest Control and. Extermination business, SIC #7342, is comparable and compatible with the listed uses n the City Gate Commerce Park PUD listed as "Both East and West of the Florida Power & Light Easement." This hearing is to seek affirmation of that opinion by the HEX. ZLTR(CUD)-P—L0160002571 (Rev 11-28-16) Page 2 of 5 City Gate Commerce Park PUD ANALYSIS: LDC Section 10.02.06 J.1.b,Comparable Use Determinations provides the following: "The County Manager or Designee may issue a zoning verification letter to determine whether a use within a PUD is consistent and compatible with the surrounding uses within the PUD. To be effective,the zoning verification letter shall be approved by the BCC by resolution,at an advertised public hearing."The BCC delegated this duty to the Hearing Examiner through Ordinance 2013-25. The applicant puts forth that a pest control and extermination business, Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) #7342, is comparable and compatible with the use as outlined in the City Gate Commerce Park PUD,Section III 3.2 Both East and West of the Florida Power& Light Easement,#3 Business and professional offices. Additionally, Section III 3.2.A. East and West of the Florida Power and Light Easement, #4 states, "any other use which is determined by the planning/zoning director to be comparable and/or compatible with the listed permitted uses." More specifically, the applicant shows this compatibility and comparability via: business functioning dyrggnics; surrounding area uses; and five stated goals in this PUD. In addition, the applicant states that the functioning of this business will be, "primarily administrative functions including sales, service, and management space." The site plan shows a building consisting of+/- 5,775 square feet of office and +/- 2,700 square feet of storage/warehouse. Administrative functions will occur in the office building while storage of field technician equipment will be kept in the storage/warehouse. The majority of field technician vehicles will not be parked at this location but rather will return home with technicians. Thus,the bulk of internal company functioning as well as the external feel will function as a business or professional office. Staff has determined that a pest control and extermination business, Standard Industrial Classification (SIC) #7342, is a permitted use within the Industrial Zoning District of the LDC and is a conditional use in the General Commercial (C-4) district. To the north of this property and within this PUD is a carwash(SIC #7542)and a gas station(SIC #5541),both are also permitted uses within the C-4 district of the LDC. To the west is the Golden Gate Commerce Park PUD which permits SIC Major Group 73, Business Services,of which pest control and extermination business are permitted uses. To the southwest is the Collier County Boulevard Mixed-Use Commercial Center (MPUD). This MPUD also permits Major Group 73, more specifically SIC #7342 Disinfecting and Pest Control Services, under which pest control and extermination fall. This property is also located within Activity Center#9 Overlay,the purpose of which is,"to create an enhanced entryway into the Naples urban area through, unified design elements and standards." Per Section 4.02.23 of the LDC, areas located within this Activity Center shall be developed with specific design themes. To further their point, the applicant contends that the requested use is consistent with the objectives outlined in PUD Section I 1.6 Objective 3 as relating to the Comprehensive Plan Policy "D." Which broadly look at diversification of: land use,economic base,and clients serviced. Furthermore,the applicant states that the requested use furthers objectives as outlined under Section II 2.2A of Project Development. More specifically, "both east and west of the FP&L easement, will be ZLTR(CUD)-PL20160002571 (Rev 11-28-16) Page 3 of 5 City Gate Commerce Park PUD utilized by commercial and industrial...and a wide variety of utilitarian and commercial business support." Lastly, the applicant has provided a comparative trip generation scenario based upon the following: In 2007,the property paid impact fees for a 10,701 square foot bank with drive through lanes. The proposed land use which consists of approximately 8,480 square feet of gross floor area divided into office uses(5,780 sq.ft.)and storage/warehouse(2,700 sq. ft.). The ITE Trip Generation Manual provides three different potential land use designations that could be used to determine the potential trip generation which includes General Light Industrial, Office/Warehouse mix and Business Park. Since Business Park generates the highest trip count of the three designations,it is being used for comparison below. Land Use Size(sq.ft.) Weekday Ayg,Trins PM Peak Hr.Tries Drive-in Bank: 10,701 1585 169' Business Park: 8,480 105 112 'This number represents a total PM peak hour trip count of 260 trips,minus 91 Pass-by trips for a total of 169 PM Peak Hour trips.See page 5 of the attachment for more details. 2 This number represents a total PM peak hour trip count of 11 trips,with no Pass-by trips for a total of 11 PM Peak Hour trips.See page 4 of the attachment for more details. By comparison, the proposed use represents a fraction of the trips that would be generated by the previously approved use and therefore should be deemed consistent from a transportation review standpoint. Based upon above analysis,the use of a pest control and extermination business, Standard Industrial Code(SIC)#7342 is comparable in nature to other permitted principal uses in the area described as "Both East and West of the Florida Power & Light Easement" under Section 3.2(A)of the City Gate Commerce Park PUD,Ordinance No. 88-93,as amended. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on 11/28/16. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner affirm the opinions of the Zoning Manager that: The use of pest control and extermination business (SIC 7342) is comparable in nature to other permitted principal uses in the area described as "Both East and West of the Florida Power & Light Easement" under Section 3.2(A) of the City Gate Commerce Park PUD, Ordinance No. 88-93,as amended. Attachments: A. Zoning Verification Letter B. Application ZLTR(CUD)-PL20160002571 (Rev 11-28-16) Page 4 of 5 City Gate Commerce Park PUD PREPARED BY: Jr -_f( RAYM 9, D V. BELL; S, ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONING DIVISION-ZONING SERVICES SECTION REVIEWED BY: 11- 2S- MICHAEL I- 2S-MICHAEL BOSI, A1CP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION ZLTR(CUD)-PL20160002571 (Rev 11-28-16) Page 5 of 5 City Gate Commerce Park PUD Co ttle County Growth Management Department—Planning & Regulation Zoning Services Division October 10,2016 Tim Hancock,AICP Stantec 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd,Suite 300 Naples,Florida 34108 Re: Zoning Verification Letter ZLTR (CUD)-PL20160002571; Zoning Verification Letter — Comparable Use Determination for the City Gate Commerce Park PUD, 3823 White Lake BIvd, located within in Section 35, Township 49 South,Range 26 East,of unincorporated Collier County,Florida. Property ID/Folio: 26095000183. Dear Mr.Hancock: This letter is in response to a Comparable Use Determination(CUD)Application dated September 27, 2016,which was submitted by you on the behalf of your client, Hulett Environmental Services. You have specifically requested a determination from the Zoning Manager and affirmation from the Office of the Hearing Examiner that the use of a pest control and extermination business, Standard Industrial Code (SIC) 7342, is comparable and compatible with the permitted uses in Section III, 3.2.A. Both East and West of the Florida Power&Light Easement(FPL)within the City Gate Commerce Park PUD,Ordinance 88-93,as amended. • The applicable ordinance regulating the zoning and use of the subject property is the Collier County Land Development Code(LDC),Ordinance 04-41,as amended.The current Official Zoning Atlas,an element of the LDC,reveals the subject property has a zoning designation of the City Gate Commerce Park PUD, Ordinance 88-93, as amended. Allowable uses are listed under Section III 3.2; more specifically, this petition looks for a comparison as outlined in Section III 3.2.A Both East and West of the FPL Easement, #3 "business and professional offices". Additionally, Section III 3.2.A. Both East and West of the FPL Easement, #4 states "any other use which is determined by the planning/zoning director to be comparable and/or compatible with the listed permitted uses." This PUD does not utilize SIC codes for use designations. Pest control and extermination services are listed under Major Group 73, Business Services, within the SIC, more specifically, SIC 7342 Disinfecting and Pest Control Services. The submitted site plan shows the proposed building with +/-5,775 square feet of office space and+/-2,700 square feet of storage/warehouse. The applicant states that the business operations at this location will be, "primarily administrative functions including sales, service, and management space" and thus comparable to business and professional offices.Furthermore,the applicant states that the storage warehouse"is primarily for storage of equipment and materials that support the pest control and extermination technicians who work in the field."Per a 10/5/16 conversation with Mr. Hancock,the majority of service trucks will be stored with the technicians, i.e. go home with them. Thus, the majority of this business' operation will be "business and professional office", as outlined in Section III 3.2 Both East and West of the FPL Easement. The applicant also examines adjacent properties for surrounding a ..comparability and compatibility. The property to the north is also the City Gate Commerce Park PUD. Immediately!north is a carwash(SIC 7542)and adjacent to that is a gas station(SIC 5541). Both car washes and gas stations are permitted uses within the General Commercial District(C-4) of the LDC just as SIC 7342,for a pest control and extermination service,are permitted uses within the C-4 district of the LDC. Immediately west is the Golden Gate Commerce Park PUD, Ordinance 00-15, as amended. While this PUD does • not include the specific use subject of this letter, it does include. SIC Major Group 73, Business Services such as 7311 Advertising Agencies,which,per the applicant,additional functions in the main building will include advertising. To the southwest is Collier Boulevard Mixed Use Commercial Center(MPUD), Ordinance 01-10,as amended. Per Section VU, 7.5.7 Business Services permits Major Group 73, more specifically 7342 Disinfecting and Pest Control Services, which pest control and extermination fall under. The Zoning Manager has reviewed the application and submittal documents and finds the argument made to compelling. It has been concluded that a pest control and extermination business,Standard Industrial Code(SIC)7342, comparable and compatible to allowable uses within the City Gate Commerce Park PUD,relating to permitted uses both east and west of the FPL easement, specifically#3 business and professional offices. Additionally, it has been concluded that the proposed use is comparable and compatible with surrounding uses both within the PUD and externally. Therefore, in accordance with the PUD Section III, 3.2 Both East and West of the FPL Easement#4, a pest control and extermination business is comparable and/or compatible with the listed permitted uses. Disclaimer: Issuance of a development permit by a county does not in any way create any rights on the part of the applicant to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the county for issuance of the permit if the applicant fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertakes actions that result in a violation of state or federal law.All other applicable state or federal permits must be obtained before commencement of the development. Please be advised that the information presented in this verification letter is based on the Collier County LDC and/or Growth Management Plan in effect as of this date. It is possible that subsequent amendment(s) to either of these documents could affect the validity of this verification letter. It is also possible that development of the subject property could be affected by other issues not addressed in this letter, such as, but not limited to, concurrency related to the provision of adequate public facilities, environmental impact, and other requirements of the Collier County LDC or related ordinances. Should you require additional information or have any questions,please do not hesitate to contact me at(239)252-8202 or e-mail: rachelbeasley@colliergov.net. Researched and prepared by: Reviewed by: • Rachel Beasley,Planner Ra d Bellows,Zoning ager Zoning Services Section Zoning Services Section C:Mike Bosi,AICP,Director Annis Moxam,Addressing Section Ian Barnwell,PUD Monitoring 1 Co County • COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.collieraov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 Zoning Verification Letter-Comparable Use Determination LDC sections 2.03.00 A,10.02.06 J&Code of Laws section 2-83—2-90 ZLTR-PL20160002571 PROJECT NUMBER 3823 WHITE BLVD PROJECT NAME Begin-9-27-16 DATE PROCESSED End-10-27-16 PUD Zoning District Straight Zoning District APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Hulett Environmental Services Address: 7670 Okeechobee Blvd City: West Palm Beach State: FL ZIP: 33411 Telephone: 800-285-7378 Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: frank@bugs.com Name of Agent: Tim Hancock, AICP Firm: Stantec Address: 5801 Pelican Bay Blvd., Suite 300 City: Naples State: FL ZIP. 34108 Telephone: 239-649-4040 Cell: 239-213-8728Fax: 239-643-5716 E-Mail Address: tim.hancock@stantec.com PROPERTY INFORMATION Site Address: 3823 White Lake Blvd Folio Number: 2605000183 Property Owners Name: TIB Bank DETERMINATION REQUEST The determination request and justification for the use must be done by a certified land use planner or a land use attorney. Provide the completed request on a separate attached sheet. Please be very specific and include the SIC Code, if known. The request should adhere to the following format: "I request a determination from the Planning Manager and approval from the Office of the Hearing Examiner, that the use of Pest Control is comparable and compatible with the permitted uses in the CR Gate 1e'C° PUD or in the Straight Zoning District.' 9/25/2014 Page 1 of 2 9ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKUST See Chapter 3 G.6 of the Administrative Code for submittal requirements. The following items are to be submitted with the application packet. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County ❑ ❑ ❑ website) Determination request and the justification for the use - PUD Ordinance and Development Commitment information + ] Electronic Copies of all documents *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all ❑ 0 0 materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff,the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. . • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. FEE REQJJIREMENTS: Application: $1,000.00; Additional Fees of$100 per hour will be charged as needed upon completion of review and research. Payment of Additional Fees will be required prior to the release of the verification. ❑ Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner:$925.00 All checks payable to:Board of County Commissioners The completed application,all required submittal materials,and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN:Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples,FL 34104 1 /4 6 x/Y 9-27-16 Applicant Signature Date Tim Hancock, AICP Printed Name Please be advised that the zoning letter is based upon the available records furnished by Collier County and what was visible and accessible at the time of inspection. This report is based on the Land Development Code that is in effect on the date the report was prepared. Code regulations could be subject to change. While every attempt has been made to ensure the accuracy or completeness, and each subscriber to or user of this report understands that this department • disclaims any liability for any damages in connection with its use.In addition,this department assumes no responsibility for the cost of correcting any unreported conditions. 9/25/2014 Page 2 of 2 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION • FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL201S0002571,Comparabb Use Determination for the City Gate yCommerce Park PUD PretrIA Tim Hulett (print name),as A / (title, if applicable)of Hulett Environmental Services (company, If a licable), swear or affirm under oath,that I am the(choose one)ownernapplicantQcontract purchaser( and that 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application;and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize TMH Hancock,AICP/Smntec to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp.pres. or v.pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company(LLC.) or Limited Company(LC.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's`Managing Member." • if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • if the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner"of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words"as trustee" • • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts in it are true. 01 , _ Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrume s sworn to(or affirmed)and subscribed before me on '1/� (date)by figs (name of person providing oath o affirmation), as who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification)as identification. STAMP/SEAL ,,; :, Sign of Notary Public atat, MYCOIpISSIONPEE848730 * EXPIRES:March 2;2017 mr'� 111 Bonded ihmSudprtNalgSavioes CP108-COA-00115155 REV 3/14/14 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION 4111 FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PI-20160002571.Comparable Use oecarmmaW1 for the City Gate Commerce Perk PUD I, g►If'Ct14Ae ev4Id) (print name),as v iLL Pies iC ,it (title,if applicable)of ns Bank (company,If a licable),swear or affirm under oath,that I am the(choose one)owner=applicantJcontract purchasernand that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches,data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application;and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize MAO Emi aanenhal services to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp.Pres.or v.pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company(LLC.) or Limited Company(LC.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's`Managing Member.' • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be.identified as the 'general partner'of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust then they must include the trustee's name and the words'as trustee. • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then • use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of petit' declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stat in It re e. r l� / V►it fesi / It/3l1(D ignature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Theprnoing in trument was sworn to(or affirmed)and subscribed before me on rr 3/4, (date)by WIC (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as Vibe Si t who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification)as identification. • .• 04310 STAMP/SEAL Signature°fail i •u dic CMENA A. Nom Pi ilo•Irliirlorkle Coawisibn Off 0N.1700. r,.r` My Comm.Fools Ma 20,402E • cr1os-conoollsuss REV 3/24/14 �1 Stantec Memo To: Ray Bellows,Planning Manager From: Tim Hancock, AICP Collier County Growth Management Naples, Florida Department File: 16-CPS-01603 3823 White Lake Blvd Date: November 28,2016 (Hulett) Reference: ZLTR(CUD) P120160002571 In accordance with your request,we have run a comparative trip generation scenario for the subject property. In 2007,the property paid impact fees for a 10,701 square foot bank with drive through lanes. The proposed land use which consists of approximately 8,480 square feet of gross floor area divided into office uses (5,780 sq.ft.) and storage/warehouse (2,700 sq.ft.). ITE provides three different potential land use designations that could be used to determine the potential trip generation which includes General Light Industrial,Office/Warehouse mix and Business Park. Since Business Park generates the highest trip count of the three designations,it is being used for the sake of comparison below,but all three land use generations are attached.The comparison is as follows: Land Use Size (sa,ft.) Weekday Avg.Trios PM Peak Hr.Trios • Drive-in Bank 10,701 1585 169' Business Park 8,480 105 1 12 1 This number represents a total PM peak hour trip count of 260 trips,minus 91 Pass-by trips for a total of 169 PM Peak Hour trips. See page 5 of the attachment for more details. 2 This number represents a total PM peak hour trip count of 11 trips,with no Pass-by trips for a total of 11 Pm Peak Hour trips. See page 4 of the attachment for more details. By comparison,the proposed use represents a fraction of the trips that would be generated by the previously approved use and therefore should be deemed consistent from a transportation review standpoint. Stantec Tim Hancock,AICP Senior Associate Phone:239-649-4040 Fax:239-643-5716 Tim.hancock@stantec.com Attachment: Trip Generation summaries,5 pages. • c. C.C. Design with con nuniy in mind ht v:\2156\active\2156135)2\plonning\correspondence\Mp_summary_memo_20161)28.docx § k § ; CO '- k k 0 m U) � ills .2 \ # a c co E K : w v. II Il II C e I- w X W ■ 2 2 (L 2 U I— o @2 R CO C % @ ) .S s 2 & -J / <d 2 § / E LU q co / Q _ a $ k § § CD © B a % 2 - $ U. © s . In ® . 2 J M - ¥ R ,- 1 _ � 1 if • ® § f # 0 N 2 2 § 3 � ° ° 52 a2 , w IN c \ T. I § q § St $ g - , $ c9 . § & 2 A ° 0 0 u a = . 1 To f m co co f , 1 2 co .2 F- k k 2 0 I i S _i 2 3 "E3 ` 2 2 A 2 1 UJ V 03 -k me ' s » § § . 0 2 . B § __ f J f a % 2 0 » » N 21 C G coO cO c0 0 rO O r C X c A it �i w + 0 0 w o 0 g C N n II E.o a E 6 5 5 I- z Iiii LL U. N O N aR 11 53 (NI o F. .13 J w til Z gl.� Onl NN in (0 J '�^ N N VV O 0 5 m M• co g a N !G 0 F- 1- • • I C § 0 e � J r' c m Y N N i 0 c `- z -a (0 W0 0 ogo o � v W 1 0 9w IN 2 I 0 I ca. CO ao 0 0 u.. :? 2 1 iii • a of as 8 U U IV�J m 0) w f- w « w g .3. g li. g I a 8 z ci 8 Y Y • 11 g .. a .. 2 - 2 A I 4. L' 0 3 3 ( r % a a o \ / • k 2 § § / s R + 2 b ii k 5 3 3 w s in a d a a c ¥ II II E a, E 5 \ , « - al ■ 8 ■ � � 2 2 \ ■ t R ( to @ at Icl @ w I. m Ch 111 2 Cl) 7 co # } E c g I 0 « a & § a a f 0al 27 � � 8 2 ) - § 1- i e a) 0 • CO J 2 J § % 2 z w o c g ® \ 2 I) $ a § w ® z coEXR, C i © 0 0 1- k a ® % U. = g ) 1 « . C 0 CS 5fe 2 1 5 t 1-V e V MI } $UJ } CO c ) 2 ) I 00 § g k C g 2 2 k I a k z k }. 8 © 2- % •R 2- » % / 1 a e a 10 s I V K V 0 $ n k 7 ■ | # ° % 2 0 o d LO CD 0 0 0co co 0 q S S © 0 + + ,i- } 2 f bi e ® + CO CO A % k c v) @ I f O2 �f ƒ co I- 2u. 2 . \ _ � ate it S e ƒ , w l'' a, cl @ CO m . % @ ® = g I us < § § K 2 - Cl) = c m $ < k § ' § § © B 2 0- « E E 1 CI .8 ia0 IL k 2 ° § 52- A n w I- 0 k / \ . ~ _ H' la E CO ■ ill' § d o 13 P.o < o o a Lu rz o ƒ • q CO § g 0 < � $ 2 , G . A2 CO /� 0 0 0 K . k 42 i � 4 k v- . / . t a £ § £ I 0 8 L z w I W & & 0 & 0 To = •G = 2 = > 2 2 ® 2 w k C k = - U - $ •Q I \ k x } x $ • 4.; al I- O. &0. O. / I k k � k t k I 4 J 2 2 . k J I I — — — —, In CD0(3 0 O 1- c- 0 gg N N a a a N 00 G N a. T O co C Q d IJJl ! u. LL N_ O N eeI v S 0 FEW Z C J _Lu— Qom) co a e 2 W E2 4 Y z co � 3 n: 11* O Gx03 E D O G 2 w g N • C d O J co Cl` _ N 8 c N 6Q v � a1 `8 c0 Q W G u' co co N Q c •q N N Z a CA 2 W y LI G a I— 1,_ .. 0 F' O � 0. n h LO C7 0 CD `c IN s c V F- V . v co w w w CO c 8 C e c al to c c '0) •C m . • Q ga E 0 =0 >. Y fA N � 00 3 3 3 1 —_ * t °'s - r• ,_ 31sl AVE SW, • lifik ,..> Safe Horbai DR .. • 7 fix'IMP , I . )i 1 IN I - I 3 0I I AV- itiiio f fi._,. • 1 • I • I Iet 1 1 I I ■ i r I f r ill 1 ; C Project Boundary . .__ POTENTIAL HULETT SITE �.- s.,...... Stafit6G �. LOCATION MAP Q ..»:•.w-.,�...,... September 2016 f•23,162•*. s - . 1 ORDINANCE 81,1-_11__ ILLAN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2 �� i ;•' THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS 11. e' a FOR TUE UNINCORPORATED AREA or COLLIER 1j,�y .d. -- . COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE ZONING P; �a . , i ATLAS MAP NUMBER 49-26-7 BY CHANGING THE SS ZONING CLASSIFICATION OP THE HEREIN • DESCRIBED REAL •PROPERTY FROM A-2 AGRICULTURE TO "PUD" PLANNED UNIT . DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS "CITY GATE COMMERCE " ' 11 i: . PARE" FOR MIXED USES NON-RESIDENTIAL, ,,, ,&. COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL/ OFFICE/RELATED I El N ' SERVICES FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE 5a Ed =�":L NORTHEAST QUADRANT OF I-75 AND C.R. 951. oc CDit,n. 287.187 4 ACRES, IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 11 '6Ja 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST; AND PROVIDING ,; u AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 1 - 4Z:,i WHEREAS, William R. Vines of Vines and Associates, Inc., ..1:c;.. . representing Citizens and Southern Trust Company (Florida) `., National Association, Naples, Florida as Trustee under Land -'r' : • Trust 15360, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the Zoning Classification of the herein described real .. -- E' property; It Non, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County . .r '"..-r= Commissioners of Collier County, Florida: . .' SECTION ONE; The zoning classification of the hereinafter described . real property is changed from A-2 Agriculture to "PUD" '- a:. Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD document attached hereto as Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein j and by reference made part hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas ' . F4' • Map Number 49-26-7, as described in Ordinance 82-2, is hereby amended accordingly. •• !- ''• .•• SECTION TKOs This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of : .... . notice from the Secretary of State that this Ordinance has il'' • been filed with the Secretary of State. i, i '•3 - DATE: pecember 13. 1988 BOARD OP COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 3+ •'• v;• COLLI COONTY�.��"" DA jYy iiTiEST; • ', BY; CN "JAMES C. GILES t CLERIC R , ' `e 5• •' This anstwarat pp�k�d�w�ii5, *� APPROVED J .;ib FORM AND LEGAL sUFFICIENCY «� o tIat 4111 • '" 0A nxwNwd i. 1, A ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNE>f8S( W4 v ar+w- ` 'l ,r. N 11111 ail 'r h, e• , �. 12-3-88 :14' '8` • i'• tai �, '• `t-.1.41. . • • r+, CITYCATE COMMERCE PARK 04 yy v;; PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT } 1 liv Prepared by • Vines $ Associates. Inc. s..y 71S Tenth Street South s ,'a' ' Naples. Florida 33940 • # Phone: (8131 202-41k 6 -1 Date Filed: 4-till ! 'ivDate Approved by CCPC:, Date Approved by BCC:12!1woo tr Ordinal.* Number: IR-93 E• `r%.. • f t. •• •• ' '. • .1: • I � t • •• SOK 033 rig V8 ip .' , is •r l I ::x rt INDEX, EY: 1` f i ! t .. : JECTION Et% t- ,�o_..i I. PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 1 • I . ', H. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 7 = 14 tic III. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS 16 23 IV. ENVIRONMENTAL REQUIREMENTS 2 - fl • ,Y.. V. TRAFFIC AND ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS 21 - 2$ ' r ' VI. UTILITIES REQUIREMENTS 2$ • 110 VII. RED COCKADED WOODPECKER MANAGEMENT PLAN l; K .v. ,•,:::".. } `• `#,. ATTACHMENTS: �w j'r MASTER PLAN . TABLE 12.8.3. N; _.d. • . �. i . 4. -Z i.1 f ,A'..,,~ • ;' - sac �1a'84 . fir; • .)‘ 'Ar•-• •‘ ••: • ••• . •,,- . • • SECTION I ... At'. • PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION •, 1.1. PURPOSE, • < •- , • • V• ' The purpose of this Section is to sat forth the location and • ,'"+44.;,: 4-7!. ownership of the property, end to describe the existing • conditions of the property to be developed under the project name of: CITYGATE COMMERCE PARK. 1.2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION. The subject property Is 287.117 acres In area. The legal description follows this page. • . 4- 1.2. PROPERTY OWNERSHIP • • Title to the property Is currently in Land Trust 1 5380, held by Citizens S Southern Trust Company (Florida) National Association. " • Naples. Florida. P.O. Box 1857, Naples. Florida 33531-1857. The land trust constitutes a unified ownership vehicle. Decisions t.: regarding trust management are made by a single trustee In accord with izienegament guidelines approved by a majority of the trust beneficiaries. • • -)SI'• SOK 03311:185 •, ....• . • •-, • r", • _( r l { 1.•!. nOLE. MONTE' AND ASSOC.. INC. 141.1A Fite No. 13023 � 913a1$$ • - x. WISULT NG ENGINEERS-LAW SURVEYORS • Sheet 1 of 2 1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION • The North half of Section 35, Township 49 South. Range 26 East, ; Collier County. Florida LESS the West 100.00 feet thereof for •4 4. right-of-way purposes and LESS the following described parcels: t A parcel of land being a portion of the Northwest quarter of • Section 35, Township 49 South. Range 26 East. Collier County. Florida. Being more particularly described as follows: • r. Commencing at the quarter Section corner, common to Sections 34 i►- and 35. Township 49 South, Range 26 East. Collier County, Florida. Said quarter corner being marked with a 4" x 4' a concrete Monument having a 3-inch brass cap attached to the top thereof, with a 314-Inch Iron pipe; thence along the Section line . between said Sections 34•and 35, North 110•29$150 test. 1.362.43 . feet to a point on the centerline.of the proposed Access Road No. t as shown on the State of Florida Department of Transportation • Right-of-Way Map for State Road No. 93 (1-7S) Sheet $ of 10; thence along said centerline of the proposed Access Road No. 1 " North 811•31'01" East. 100.00 feet to a point on the East , , right-of-way line of a canal,-said point also..being on the • centerline of the proposed access road to the water treatment �` #�. plant parcel; thence along said East canai_.right-of-way line North 00°29'iS' West, 50.00 feet to a 4' x 4" concrete monument marking the Northwest corner of the proposed access road # right-of-way to'the water treatment plant parcel; and being the ;, • true POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel to be herein described; ' i thence along the North line of said access road right-of-way i North $6•31'01' East, 456:51 feet to a 48 x 4' concrete monument marking the intersection of said North right-of-way with the-Wast boundary line of the water treatment plant parcel; thence along said West boundary line North 00.47'10' East. 994.$11 feet to an , iron rod on the Westerly right-of-way of a strip of land 170 het in width for a Florida, Power%6 Light Company (FM) right-of-way . as described In Official Records Book 6$1, Page 1210, Collier • County Records; thence along said Westerly FP6L right-of-way s North 31.30'268 East, 70.02 feet to an- iron rod; thence t . continuing along said Westerly FP6L right-of-way South S$830'03' . East. 761.56 feet to a 4" x 48 concrete monument; them • continuing along said Westerly FP61. right-of-way South 00.47.14° r• West, 1,066.70 feet to a 4' x 4' concrete monument; thence icontinuing along said Westerly FP6L right-of-way South 00.47114' ,- West. 332.74. feet to an Iron rod marking the intersection of said Westerly Mt. right-of-way with the South line of the North half ;• of the South half of the Northwest quarter of Section 35, f Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County. Florida; said %t point also being the Southeast corner of the parcel being herein 1 described; thence along said South line of the North halt of the y South half of the Northwest quarter of Section 35. South $9•04'40' West, 690.$2 feet to s 4" x a" concrete monument; said 2 I. • . nig IYd ►'I • . __ - ..1.:;,••,'''ll''. 1 ' . 1111116 MI i, Iiiii ,..4s. l'eq: gft• • li 0 ' . mast` 1A 1File Ne. 05.23 € a: 4!30!00 .� , : .' Sheet 2 O f 2 3 s-. •• ►. L X' . point being the Southwest corner of the parcel being herein described; thence along the •West boundary line of said parcel �.. North 00.47'14" East. 653.80 feet to a 4" x 4' concrete monument • marking the intersection of the West boundary of the water 4' treatment plant parcel with the South right-of-way of the :.1 proposed access road to the water treatment plant parcel; thence along said South right-of-way South 05631'01• West. 454.20 feet to a 4" x 4" concrete monument marking the intersection of said access road South right-of-way with the East right-of-way of a ` canal; thence along said canal East right-of-way North 00.25'15" • West 100.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. AND A portion of the North half of Section 35, Township 41 South, Range 20 East; being described so. follows: . Begin on the South line of the North half of said Section 35, at a point North 81000'016 East 100.00 feet from the Southwest corner of the North half of said Section 35, thence run North 00621450 Wrest, 1,334.11 feet, thence South 04.21'08" East, . +: 290.02 feet, thence South 02.40'25" East. 750.00 feet to the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeasterly having a radius z of 331.00 feet, thence run Southerly along said curve 240.50 ,t` feet. through a control angle of 41.01'25to the end of said curve, thence South 43"47'54" East, 14.80 feet to the South line 1 of the North half of said Section 35. thence South 8!•00'01" .- West, 200.27 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. AND A portion of the North half of Section 35, Township 41 South. i Range 20 East; being described as follows: Begin on the South line of the North half of said Section 35, it a point North 09.00'01" East, 300.27 feet from the Southwest corner of the North half of said Section 35, thence run North . 03'47'S4' west, 04.00 feet to the beginning of a curve centavo to ' the Northeasterly having a radius of 330.00 feet, thence run r. Northwesterly along said curve 240.58 feet through a central °. . angle of 41'01'29" to the end of said curve. thence North .. 02046'25" West. 750.00 feet. thence North 04021'08" West, 216.42 `'• feet. thence North 00020'15' West, 85.00 feet. thence North t 01.31600' East. 04.42 feet, thence South 04021'00" East. 370.34 feet. thence South 02.40.'25' East, 751.56 feet, to the beginning of a curve concave to the Northeasterly having a radius of 210.00 feet, thence run Southeasterly along said curve 140.40 feet. through • central angle of 41001'29' to the end of said curve. thence South 43.47'54" East, 151.68 feet to the South line of the North half of said Section 35, thence South 89•80'01' West, 05.40 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. -.7,.� Containing 207.107 acres, more or less. • • i3 4 • HOLE. MONTE! Sr ASSOCIATES. INC. r.-- V 1818 frd IIIMIIMili MEM { 4 .l{I'!. •'�•. ""`&'•$.11. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA . ... A. The 217.147 acre tract lies in the northeast quadrant of the I-73/ CR 951 Interchange. The property is bounded on the west by CR 951 and en ilia north by the Golden Cats Canal. 8. The property Is zoned A-2 Agricultural. proposed to be -.- ..-4:. rezoned to PUD- Planned Unit Development. The property lies �, t .. In the Collier County water Sewer District. r µ.¢ I.S. PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION The property elevation ranges from about 10.3 fest to 12.2 fest above awn see level, averaging about 11 feet. Wetlands on the , property are limited to about 24.3 acres, most of which has been previously subjected to extended periods of over drainage ,, . and exotic vegetation Invasion. Most of the property Is vegetated ,,i with pine and associated upland plants. A: Poll types on the pr�pe ty include Arzell. Karl, and Pompano Fine r , ` Sand. j t''2 r- Water management for the Citygate Coemmerce Park project Is to be the lake and natural surface detention type. Surface water .` discharge will be to the north Into the Golden Gate Canal through :I. a single control structure. • S_' ''III 114, o33,...-8s v.. !.,-.. . -` . `11/111 MID t S • r '";t,'t • $.i. §TATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE i ', ;'.__ ' Development of Citygets Commerce Park as a Planned Unit k" r•. Development will comply with the planning goals and objectives of I Collier County as set forth in the Comprehensive Plan. The ,- • Comprehensive Plan Policy which most specifically relates to the 1.'. Citygate project Is Policy NON of Objective 3: 1i• . r OBJECTIVE 3 1 :'' ' An appropriate affix of land uses to provide for the present • •: and future needs of Collier County. El's . i ' ' 0. Guide economic devolop Bent to encourage a diversifiation of k .'. ` the county's economic base and to meet the employment needs Ef . of present end future residents. • Compliance with the Comprehensive Plan rests on the i . following factors: • ' ' . 1. The Citygate property meets the Comprehensive Plan .w. ; +ter: • c,, rating point system with respect to the availability of public services and facilities. 2. The planned land use mix conforms to the Future Land r. ` • Use Mop. <.e,r„ . i t . s ti,": ' . w , xMV ' VW rte,. •. ..: - *..,. Mal. r m; . 1 '- • 1 • '. ' '.- -1. I . ! . •.".40%.• " ; •i ''''„ ; .. tI•i: •.. ',.\,• ' •,. i l•4's' *** 3. All project improvements will comply with applicable i i•'s regulations. . , t, •• 4. The project will constitute a major work canter with an ... ,,,,r• ( i • excellent working environment. r •1 e% ;'i 5. The project will be served by a complete range of . 1 • , services and facilities. / , .,14%•• • 1 • • . - . ; .: ', ..i•-.- • ,. ••- •, .....:17 • r .r.- ,..•!, 1 .4.„ „:• ,' t •-• , . . .. ;', .. ' • ' .1., • e 1"il le s • I ,,:-4.." • . . . I . .. .... -„, •• • . ._ —_ . . , ,••• • .. , 1 . ,..„ -, ..;•• . -..1.z. ,.. . . '• ; , , •;•.?'4- . ....... . . , . „, .. . . ... .. • i .. 1.•,!, , . . .:. .• .. • . , .•.,,, ;, • ..,t ,.,... 331E4 ;, •7 • '. 1 .--- - .._.._ . .— . _ _ OMR 1 • 4 y•' SECTION N .. PROJECT DEVELOPMENT -,;:1.- 2.t. pURPosi '. purpose purpeof this Section is to describe the basic development y't objectives and to generally describe the project development j ..t..!." pian. • ' 2.2. f ENERA4 . f i • r . ; . .- A. Cltygah Common:" Park is planned as a nixed use. nen• i1�!,.' residentld. ' project. The uses on some. if not all. of the sites nearest . CR SSI west of the F.P. s L. easement will provide a variety of oenenerdal services to highway ighway travelers. with a special emphasis on the provision of service to interstate . +. travelers. The of the sites. both east and west of the F.P. s L. easement, F,% - ----,r, Is entkipated that some 1 � • of the Climate land uses wilt be linked with educational t '3; I 1.i"`• ; 1lT 1. a - MN 033 Pig"91 i , 1 N • • L i •.' institutions. Citygate Commerce Park will provide sites f which accommodate a variety of en y twpreneurld activities in . a physical setting which is specious. attractive, and free • of the nuisance type characteristics which are typical of industrial districts of the pat. A primary development objective of Citygate is that the structures, the amenities. and the natural and installed landscape be attractive and • tk constitute a pleasant, satisfying employment environment. B. Development of this project shall be governed by the `•• contents of this document end applicable sections of the Collier County Zoning Ordinance. • i i •• C. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shell ;. be the same as the definitions sat forth.In the Collier t y County Zoning Ordinance. 1• ! 4 • • 4iJ � ••fat. • .r:.i. iyf • • i.,�R • ,roti e • ma w .i 0nA Vtt02 • 1`_ . I t •, ' • ! . t - '•di • i ,. 'A ';‘• t• . ,1.. . . ! r t 1, . (• . 3 "b. V I. i •4 %: ! '1* I 0, • ) r t ).., % , 2.3. PROJECT PLAN ...k I,. t .4-. • t .. ,,,,p . • , .. A. The Master Development Plan for the project Is indicated on Mop (H) of the Application for Development Approval and Is P' an Integral part of this PUD document. A reduced version of ! • the Master Development Plan Is attached at the roar of this document. Elements of the Mester Development Plan includes ... +.• lansLku Ascii . 7.2 • Streets 21 Lake . 35 Common Lands 10 P.P. $ L. Easement 12 S' % . Building sites lindudes wetland , . I preserves which must be kept as f;', , on•site natural areas) 291. Total 257 1'4 Project development shall conform to the approved Mester Development Plan in general and to the approved Subdivision L .$ ,4 4. .k •' Construction Plans. > 1 I..•; c, • , ... B. In addition to the plan elements shown en the Master ,,- • ) 1 '• Development Plan, such easements and rights-of-way ! ..." shall be established as may be necessary or desirable for • 1. the service, function or convenience of the project. •:..., 1 *, ".• 1 ;2 1 1 i. nf.b. 1 ...".... k'. . I I i h MK 033 Parht"93 ' . I _ • •• i ... 1 ..,,,,...... . .. —. 1 ro +.1, Ili 51 T h til { .." r Cit i.. f••.rr` 'h. `,` ^• %. C. The Mester Development Plan is also the Subdivision C < < -,-.5.' Master Plan. I:'.: • • 2.5. jIAAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY , r•„F tr. t:N: • Development Intensity permitted within CitYgate Commerce Park yam. shall be limited to the amount of building development. number of "! employees, and number of parking spaces set forth in Table y 4, 12.B.3.. reproduced frac the Cltygate Commerce Perk A.D.A.,and ' � attached at the rear of this document. The amount of building development devoted to the various land uses which will occupy • the project may very from the estimates Incorporated in the A.O.A., but the aggregate amount of building development t— Indicated by A.O.A. Table 12.8.3. may not be exceeded. : 2.5. PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS i L. _ fir A. PSE ;J D e, . ,i. ,• The Master Development Plan Indicates the basic nature of - j.:11.`".: development permitted for the project as a whole, consisting of a road network. a centrally located lake. a system of . pedestrian ways, a lake front amenity site and corridors of . development sites along which Individual development parcels t will be established. Installation of required streets. . "l t. • • p z 10 r,� MIR moa 14 MIN Ell • ` i> y. 4. • • • 74, utilities. etc. may occur either In the entirety. or in e . '. series of increments. The . ��, :•. purpose of the plan approval ' requirements is to provide a mechanism for the county staff to review detailed development plans and to determine If those plans comply fully with commitments established by the • PUD document. ORI Development Order. County Zoning Regulations and all other applicable standards and regulations. County staff approval of detailed development •' plans must be obtained prior to the construction of project ,1. infrastructure. • B. SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIRED • 4_S. Prior to issuance of building permits for structure or structures on any development site. Site Development Plan f. approval must be obtained In accord with Section 10.5 of the County Zoning Ordinance. The Site Development Plan must be In substantial compliance with the project Master Development Plan. as that plan may be modified by Collier County from time to time. In addition to the listed concerns of Section 10.5. the Sits Development Plan review • and approval process shall include consideration of architectural design quality and building materials suitability as those matters relate to the development quality commitments set forth in Section 2.2.A. of this document. • it Mit -95 is -. ts . 'r- tis c.,,ti . C. RECORD PLAT APPROVAL REQUIRE/ANTI • Prior to recording the record plat, final plans of the f required improvements shall be approved by the 1 Planning/Zoning Director end appropriate other Collier County Departments and Officials to insure,complian a with the project Master Development Plan. the Cofllar County '. : Comprehensive Plan, the Collier County Subdivision Regulations. and platting laws of the State of Florid:. i,.., 2.1. EXCEPTIONS TO COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS ' i, j •' The following requirements shall be waive k.er modified: E,,'xr A. Article X. Section 16: Sidewalks shall be required as shown . on the approved Master Development Plan, on at least one Y. side of the existing access road when it Is reconstructed as Erequired by 5.2.B., and on st least one side of all internal f . project streets. �` • ' B. Article X, Section 11: Street name signs shall be approved :!. by the County Engineer but need not meet the , U.S.D.O.T.F.H.1r.A. Manual of Uniform Trdik Control Devices. Street pavement painting, striping, and reflectivei ,f . edging requirements shell be waived. j :o z: .! • r" 12 ' )1',k-' .t f" VM i ;. IIIRh` i717 , •A - , . Ile 1w+ .? I I. � . ' t -. .. ' fie. C. Article XI. Section 10: The requirement to install monuments ants ',•-... in a typical water valve cover shall be waived if all monuments are Installed to accord with state standards and in a manner approved by the County Engineer. . D. Article Xi..Section 21: The requirement for blank utility L casings shall be waived if all required utilities are . installed prior to construction .f the street base and pavement. .4';•,- 'e.' 2.7. STREETS TO BE PRIVATE f All platted streets within the project shall be the common `; ''.Aproperty off the project landowners. , Altif ' 2.0. IMPACT FEES • ' .'All.. ThCitygate Commerce Park project shell be subject to all impact s . f fees applicable to it st the time of project approval. In the event future impact fees are adopted to assist with various i� public service facility financing. such fees shall be applicable i .,1• to the Citygate Commerce Park project In accord with the terms of ti. the ordinances which impose the fees. 1 . ;.i.4‘'....1... 13 . '-l. y ' PIM' , Mac 033 "97 • -.tt !,, . r •�J' 3 •.. i 1 e `i tr s. r• t,,,.. .._. „. i. t•,1 t - ,.- 2.! ? IRE STATION SITE ' f ...,. • i• i ... 7,4 •,• • • Citygate Commerce Park representatives shell confer with• . .`. appropriate Golden Cate Fire Control and Rescue District representatives regarding the need for an additional fire station 17. site in the vicinity of the 1-75/CR 951 interchange. In the event that the Golden Cate Fire Control and Rescue District determines that a fire station site is appropriate on the 'c" Citygate property, the Citygate Commerce Park developer or successor's) in title shall make the selected fire station site ii�- available, and shall contribute to its cost on a fair share . y basis. 1 '. �:rr•2►iO.P.U.D. DOCUMENT COMPLIANCE G 4 � • c l`. Responsibility for compliance with the terms of this PUD • ,:'_ ' document, the DRI Development Order and all other applicable public regulatory requirements shall initially be that of the ,t project developer or his successor's) in title. Prior to the ' developer or his successor's) in title being relieved of this 'fresponsibility, a project management entity shall be established .*`'. and given responsibility for continuing maintenance of the a • r • project infrastructure, lake, water management facilities, common �,;'• open space, streets, etc. • r it' ,`F. 1# • ',.‘., UN 033 PA18 . y=_ -,.. ` • 1 . :f ,4 • •, •z• •,,,..34.. . il.: I f: `fyl .1 SECTION III ?f �';+-• `7-:ir PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS ' Y 's,,„Sot1 puRPOsI :;,`..:',F. ", . •+i The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development ~`. `` '''-6.. regulations applicable to the Citygate Commerce Park project. 1 •.•,•r4_ • .,:,,'.., 1.2. USES PERMITTED • •' ' No buildingor structure, or r'••• • r part thereof. shall be erected. ' -f ' K . altered or used. or land used. in whole or part. for other than ' : • the following: • • i ~': A. Principal Uses: 1 `.‘...4 . ..f r '4. '''x : . • WEST OF THE FLORIDA POWER $ LIGHT EASEMENT: • ' ,'.e + • 1. One gasoline service station or fuel dispensing y•i: • 't F facility • r 4. • • 2. Hotels or motels Including integral cocktail lounge -.: 3. Retail sales and personal sales businesses which are N - Is ' • • L. ti .x•.; p 7. travelers and/or the Citygate Commerce Park market. ''. Retail sales facilities shall not include shopping •:) center type uses which would generate substantial trade ti, from the residential neighborhoods In the vicinity. s i;:' EAST OF THE FLORIDA POWER $ LiGHT EASEMENT: : A• 1. Light manufacturing and/or processing L. I °M`k: 2. Research. testing, product development 3. Service and repair businesses 1 •1. • i. Showrooms and sales centers in association with cr permitted uses tt ' tlil ., a' 6. Storage and distribution uses . 11. Publishing, reproduction. communications 7. Retail sola and personal service businesses which are 'fit. designed and operated to primarily serve the CitYgete Commerce Park market •Y .r •4$t Y I w •c I , _ 1111 I3'�4 m +: _ �...,......- 1 SI taasisP tA� t A k i ; ice", . t+1 i • BOTH EAST AND WEST OF THE FLORIDA POWER S LIGHT EASEMENT: tivt . !"TI.,:,,a • f +. 1. Restaurants. including fest food restaurants �` try. 1'•'; •S 2. utilitarian, recreational, educational, and medical t• uses and services R: Pir ..i.j !. Business and professional offices: financial i ri• institutions !'.. 4 .. , s`' I. Any other use which Is determined by the Manning/ Zoning Director to be comparable and/or compatible with 1'...--.‘r.:'. • the the listed permitted uses. 4 i •. ► B. Accessory uses: it e • -, ;. • .• � F •� 1. Accessory uses and structures which are customarily 6 •• t associated with the permitted uses {{I{I{ ` 2. Project sales and administrative offices and facilities ` 3. Signs as permitted by the Collier County Zoning ,,"r`'n! Ordinance in effect at the time of application for the j sign Permit • f 7 T.< C' , •• 4 „! •' 17 ; t., ' • - ') lw O33,15%1O1 .49 i ---- aw MI rt, •. + rc: •; . i• T ' . - r ik..•• ' J t.•:..4.1.,,!' .; i ,,-, : . ; •. Caretaker's residence subject to Section i1.40 of the •',, • Zoning Ordinance '• f • • S. A perimeter security fence and/or wail. not to exceed 0 . f.;. feet in height s: •s, S. Temporary sewage treatment facilities In the area so' ` indicated on the project Muter Development Plan. Such temporary facilities may serve the project until public or other county approved off site sewerage service is �t available. The temporary sewage treatment plant and all associated facilities shall be set back a minimum of SO feet from the boundaries of the tract which It i occupies. j , 7. Material which Is excavated during construction of the iif lake which exceeds in amount the material required for t. development of the project moq be removed from the i- i'*, project. Approval from the County Engineer and the i' ; Planning/Zoning Director shall be required to assure no negative Impacts on surrounding lands or on impacted I. roods. Mitigation measures may be required if deemed .T. appropriate and necessary by the County Engineer and/or Planning/Zoning Director. '" •t.. t. f. -` ,.„. . t• ! 3.,. . ,'. • . .::: ~4.,•,l S •,'i tX,.t,�0: i 033 rut 102 Ate) 1• u' • ... • 11011 • t 4 , �•' + • .1 ' $.:. DEVELOPKT STANDARD% r h.- • A. Minimus Parcel Size: r' ' , West of F.P. $ L. easement: 1 sera East of F.P. $ L. easement: 2 acres Si 1. D. Minimmmm Parcel Width: 57. ._t.+ • West of F.P. t L. easement: 150 feet F ` East of4P.P. $ L. easement: 200 feet C. Minimum Yards: • '41 +:. West of F.P. t L. easement: front. side and rear yards: 25 t feet unless adjoining parcels ore jointly planned. In which fr case the adjoining side yard requirements may be waived or f ' : modified during the SDP approval process. East of F.P. t L. assonant: Front yard- 50 feet • +, '''• Rear yard- 50 feet Side yard- 25 feet. unless adjoining parcels are jointly • 1 planned, in which case the adjoining side yard requirements may be waived or modified during the SDP approval process.INK 033'PA 103• tsf ti - I I ' 1 . r • i 7 '.,'` E ! f f .lig '.fA In these Instances where multiple buildings are to occur on ` ''s a single site, yard requirements shall pertain only to the • site boundaries, not to separation between buildings. On site multiple building separation adequacy shall be •,, • determined during the SDP approval process. No more than 20% of required yards may be devoted to vehicular drives and parking spaces. 1 D. Minimum On Site Natural andlor installed Landscape Area: West of F.P. t L. easement: 20% of gross site area 1 ,, Eaes Best of F.P. t L. easement: 30% of gross sits ar r: The term: •Landscape Ara" is construed to include ,' fountains, pools, ponds and other water,features, walks, terraces, courtyards and other pedestrian spaces i when such non-botanical features do not envied 15% of the required arse. ' it.- , E. Maximum Building Height: '' Hotels, motels and office buildings: 0 stories, except that J ti c such uses which are closer than 350 fest to the Golden Gets x Canal may not exceed 3 stories. ,`='. All other uses: 3 stories 4 i--- w33 sal ( 12'4io4 vtt77 y . . :. . 4�F • i'.:. Taller buildings may be authorized upon application. i following advertised public hearings with due public notice ,.;• by the Gaither County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners. a recommendation by the Collier County • Planning Commission, and approval by the Board of County a . Commissioners. Prior to authorizing a taller building, determination shell be made by the County that the nature of the use to which the building is to be devoted warrants the additional height, that the taller building will not depreciate the Intended character and quality of the overall Citygste project, and that it will not have negative Impacts upon surrounding properties or be detrimental to the public T welfare. P. Minbeum Principal Building Floor Area: M 1.000 square fest (Gasoline service stations are exempt from this standard.) } G. Merchandise Storage and Display: There shall be no outside storage or display of merchandise. • '^ H. Utilities: Electrical, telephone and television service lines shell be pieced underground. Pad mounted transformers and other components of underground service systems which are normally located above ground shall be placed and !!f screened so as not to be visible from a street right-of-way adjoining pr'op�y. or an i r'f Meal 033,1'4105 • • 4 •illo . :..c-'"t. •• kr ' IIIIIMMINI IIIIIIIMIP M S. ` I. Parking/Loading: Offstreet perking and loading spines shall i;., ': • be provided in accord with Cie standards of the Collier County Zoning Ordinance in effect at the time of building • permit application. Parking and Seeding facilities shall be ? so arranged that backing into, or out of, a street right-of- , a .. way is unnecessary. { �,s• I 44,,,„ 'f. J. Performance Standards: Noise. odor, vibration. glare las • differentiated from general illumination). smoke and dust readily detectable by human senses at property boundary • .; lines shall not exceed the background levels characteristic of retail cam ercial areas. In the event some or alI of 11• , thew performance characteristics are regulated by applicable federal, stab. and/or local law. such ./. regulations shall control. ' N { uses which generate special or hazardous waste shall not be established or permitted to operate unless definitive plans for dealing with the waste product have been approved by all • w+ • agencies with jurisdiction over the matter. Further, said I uses shall be governed by ai1 applicable federal, state. - ` • z and/or local laws as may be adopted or amended from time to time. `t.I -.3 . '.:I';' The future performance characteristics of a given land use I. 033►mi06 f •. • • sAattiV4. 4.•-• N' .,. , . . c ,>if.;;.. i • t;' 1C::': iV III .:4 • ; iil : •f • are often not predictable with accuracy at the three of '' building permit Issuance. The above listed performance •-..r. •�i' - standards not only apply at the time land uses are initiated. but are continuing performance obligations. �''•. unless overridden by applicable faders'. state. and/or local y i/r.1,, , law. /.4.t: IC. Golden Gate Canal Buffer requirements: Development of sites • -�. which abut the Golden Gate Canal shall Include installation y , of landscape and/or structural buffers which insure that f j, residentially zoned properties on the north side of the canal are not subjected to inappropriate views. Buffers • K shall be shown on site development plans as required by Section 2.S.B. In._evaluating the buffer component of site development plans. the Planning/Zoning Director shall determine adequacy of the planned buffer, taking into ... account the nature of the planned sits utilisation, the • t • w. character of the planned structureisl....and the presence of natural vegetation which will be left in place and which [t; ':., . will contribute to the buffering function. At a minimum. i the buffer adjacent the Golden Gate Canal shall comply with ", the standards of Section 11.37 of the Zoning Ordinance. The ::::', 1. tree and shrub species, sizes, and spacing shall be approved 1 during the Site Development Plan approval process, and if deemed to be necessary by the Planning/Zoning Director. v shall be more extensive than required by Section 11.77. 0336107 ..:,.::•,,-; • I. '1� . 1 41' 1,; 3Y '-.• i ' V t . ,�4.....0 r' • I:r. '`''•e L. Wetland Preserve Setbacks: MIMn all or a portion of a • wetland preserve is located an a building site, no building may be located closer than 20 feet end no pavement mey be + . closer than 10 feet to the preserve boundary. Precise i ; . determination of the preserve boundary shall occur during the Site Development Plan review and approval process. '- Preserve areas shown on the Master Plan shall also be shown on the Subdivision Plat. along with a notation referencing �.; the Citygate Commerce Park PUO. I ..t.,...4....... �' • s I ..,r„ ,• . • • • 1'. 1* W3,a t� ;,P 8 • . I,;.: � . 4 - ; _ IMSOPINIP IMP i1. k!.+7. ' mil.:, 'S. •SSECTION IV • � ENVIRONMENTAL RECUIREMENTS la s vv;%'it v. � '!:C.. • Li. PURPOSE, f _,,,;".t.'..: _: The purpose of this Section is to set forth the stipulations by the Environmental Advisory Council. The development of the 'T t' ;r• project shall be subject to these stipulations: . 4 4.2. DEVELOPER REOUiREMENTS . 1• A.. The developer shall be subject to Ordinance 75.21 (or the . tree/ vegetation removal ordinance in existence at the time i'41-:'' of permitting). requiring the acquisition of a tree removal r-..3 permit prior to any land clearing. A site clearing plan ` shall be submitted to the Natural Resources Management r'' Department for their review and approval prior to any work on the site. This plan may be submitted in phases to Vti, coinclde with the development schedule. The sits clearing plan shall clearly depict how the final site layout Incorporates retained native vegetation to the maximum: extent possible and how reads. buildings. lakes, parking Iota, and other facilities have been oriented to accommodate ' this goal. } '. ' • _i4 �« 033 ►+'d 109 , , 25 .r w. i I- Q { • . ..t. ',", „„•1 ' . . - . , -. ?. ..P714'• • .t, •• • jeit .•.•. 't 1 • '1,4''lif .t.f. irl .:, • f • • , . I ).• -3, • ' - , ii,:•,.; - '; ' • 1 • ,'• I '-. .. , : B. Native species shall be utilized, where available, to the -':.-. ' , . , . .maximum extent possible in the site landscaping design. A V. i' • , . ' landscaping plan will be submitted to the Natural Resources . .. Management Department and the Community Development Division , - .; . . for their review and approval. This plan will depict the ., ...— - •. •i ,. .,„. 'ri.. incorporation of native species and their mix with other • ...: - species, If any. The goal of site landscaping shall be the .. ' • .01.....' : reestablishment of native vegetation and habitat .,.';.::•-;.• characteristics lest on the site during construction or due •:;', N to pest activities. ‘.. .,•••-ts •,-P.:; C. All exotic plants, as defined in the County Cods. shall be „,.. . removed from development areas. open spar.*-areas, and •.', , preserve areas during each phase of.•.construction. Following .- , . •••••, I...... site development, a continuing maintenance program shall be ICJ:. Implemented to prevent reinvesion of the site by such exotic ,.. . . . : .i. . . species. The maintenance plan,whith describes control . . 4 , 41 techniques and Inspection intervals shall be submitted to .. , *-•• and approved by the Natural Resources Management Department ..• .. :, and the CommunityDevelopment Division. ...., . .. r , . „ - D. If, during the course of site clearing, excavation, or other .-.., ...; , .'. constructional activities, an archaeological or historical • - '.,....1 site. artifact, or other Indicator Is discovered, all . 1 • : development at that location shall be immediately stopped and the Natural Resources Management Department notified. .. ..... - , :.• 4; ,. i : . 0 '.. • , ,•;., , 033. 110 A 1 .4 :.• 0 .. .•• • )-!'" . • '401., • • .•.• - • ------ -• ---- .—___ f.:a • �, it '.7. ,I;; L ,-1 ft •' • .744'. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of €'. ; time to enable the Natural Resources Management Department • or i designated consultant to assess the find and determine II,: the proper course of action in regard to its salvageability. r,1. The Natural Resources Management Department will respond to r. any such notification in a timely and efficient manner so as f: to provide only a minimal interruption to construction E`, setiv{tiea. 11 j. ''r- E. Prior to development in surrounding areas, wetland preserve L".. areas will be flagged by the petitioner. Wetland boundaries 7 4 • ' f; will be subject to the review and approval of NRMD. i ' F. To increase lake productivity and habitat values, lake side ," .i slopes will be 4:1 out to a depth of 3' from mean low water , ' A levels. Petitioner shall investigate vegetating littoral • shelf areas with various native plant species (upon request. -`` NRMD can provide pertinent'Information concerning plant species). •l C. Petitioner shall design and implement a program to prevent ,`-•r a and/or reduce populations of noxious/exotic plant populations within the lake(s), specifically, but not limited'to, preventing growth of hydrilla (jlvdr{11g vsrticillatgl, water hyacinth (ilichhornla emotes), and ' is ,'} i . taw 033 nu in . ' 3.fs 21 "a r i. .r . ,� �.f.. •,i 3t - •' . • ito a lesser degree) cattails ITvoha Satire*); this •��''. program will be subject to the review end approval of NRMD. • H. A survey for the presence and distribution of the protected Red Cockaded Woodpecker (Ficoidq borealis) must be '' conducted by qualified personnel subject to approval by e• NRMD. Results of the survey must be made available to NRMD. Management plans shall be submitted for review and approval to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Florida Gane and Fresh Water Fish Commission and NRMD. If necessary, the project design and PUD Master Development Plan shall be adjusted to Insure the survival of the protected species. • • i; I. Where applicable. due to development, components of plant communities will be transplanted within preserve areas and/ or as landscape elements within the project. Examples of • plant species appropriate for transplant would include sabot '• palms (Sabel palmetto). and butterfly orchids iJncvclia, ). .1. Due to the concern of the use/generation of hazardous substances, all businesses proposed.for the parcel must be 1 subject to the review and approval of NRMD. ION 033Pr4 112 • • to f, • • • • t 6. $111•11111111 • • 1 ..3 '? . .. K,yi.... SECTION V <,. I TRAFFIC AND ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS ;rx•,. • . x ;if": 6.1. ?URPOsI .. .}•' -0-7 The purpose of this Section Is to set forth the traffic ,- t requirements which the If: traprovn rp project developer must undertake assn integral part of the project development. y• tt__Ir .. S.2. DEVELOPER REQUIREMENTS , . , - , ... . ... . , ... . A. Access to this site from CR 151 may present design problems - • i, due to the limited distance between Golden Cate Canal and the limited access right-of-way for 1-75. Access drives onto CR !Si shell be limited to the existing one which aligns '•, with the water treatment plant access drive and one additional which may be located north of the existing access ►. drive. ,t a, 1 N,f• S. The existing access road which extends southerly from CR 151 `'" and then easterly parallel to 1-7S shall be reconstructed to i', a minimum four lane divided roadway from the CR !Si b , Intersection to the southwest corner et the Citygate - 1 is property at such time as traffic volumes on the reed link warrants the four lining. In the event that a signirleant •j Vii.'''=.. I$K 033 Pr ;y,it, 21 f; 4 s ti: ��T'� ,e 1 - _ • w l1. ,i t '" J R �♦:.. ;'r ' . .tel O jp {. d • 'j_.Y a. �`ti fraction d the traffic on the road link is not generated by '-! •-.. the Citygate project, the Citygata project shall pay a ,. ..f.'..... portion of the four laming cost which is equal to its i- -'t� ! traffic Impact. ! .:+ • ';.` C. The driveway to the water treatment plant shall be widened I zi ti' O • to a minimum of 2s feet if it is utilized as an access to i - the adjacent tracts. . .y D. The close spacing of the CR 951/landfill access reed >,• intersection and the landfill access road/water plant entry ,* drive Intersection will cause traffic control problems as traffic volumes through the two intersections Increase. In 4111 t. order to avoid unnecessary aggravation of those problems by s traffic movements into and out of the commercial sites which it... are closest to the intersections. special attention shall be , ' given to the location of entry/exit drives when site 1 development plan applications for sites abutting the water plant access drive and the landfill access road aro being reviewed. It shall be understood that the number of access ,:'. points will be limited In number. t . i ,`.. • E. Appropriate left and right turn lanes shell be provided on CR 951 and the landfill access road at all project accesses. +; Street lighting shall be provided at major access points per I., j. County requirements. -(;4:', �31v114 i 4 s�' NOK 033Psi f` 30 r;. . y �F. , . . .: .. , .... . •- ,..•.,A ; I . ...I. ..i., • 1:. - , , ,... . •• . , ..g •,,,,, r/. ...„...:: . 4•;:It . , . . , • ' • ..,. t,.. ',. • • F. Traffic signals shall be Installed at CR Ut access points 4 when deemed warranted by the County Engineer. The signals , •)...' shall be owned. operated. and maintained by the County. The ,•1.,• - ...• , .. .... Citygets project shall pay a fair share portion of the ---- . . '•:''.1 -1‘. signal installation costs. ' ..:. ••*:r.,"• , ...‘. .• ---.. . .." ,.. ..)=.• .. 1. C. The above improvements are consisered "sits related* as :'TM •• defined by Ordinance U-U and shall not be applied as .„. . , . . -, •, 1 credits toward any impact fees required by that ordinance. ,. .. • !•• .•'•' . H. Detailed site drainage plans shall be submitted to the , ...,. . ,..:, . III County Engineer for review. No construction permits shell be Issued unless and until approval of the proposed • . ;t':i• • .. t .: constructin In saxprdenee with the submttlted plans Is t* : i' • granted by the County Engineer. *. i ,. . : . ,..Z,..4:::.• . • . i • •'•- .. 4..- I. An excavation Permit will be required for the proposed lake in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 10-21. as r S amended by Ordinance No. 811-3, and es may be amended in the , • . ,... . ' ''r.1V ' ,,,, • . - • -;,V..., . ! 11.?„..k-, • , Mk 033 ri115g ,. ,. . . • Olt.C.I . r^..., 'S.>. '''...14. . - , .el / 31 • . . ' • • , . , . .. , . •:t. . •• (:-Y,,I f • It • : • , . , • . t I • { I �� , . . F. yA4r� t)+ .1' SECTION VI ''St UTILITIES REQUIREMENTS 1•- [y . .r•. 1.1. FURPOS€ aA' a;: • t •t .i-' The purpose of this Section Is to set forththe potable q4. water, irrigation water, and sewer utilities requirements y•.::,. which the project developer Is committed to meet. 4 1.2. DEVELOPER REQUIREMENT!' V H• :.*f.--, . A. Water distribution and sewage collection and transmission systems will be constructed throughout the project development by the developer pursuant to all current • .. requirements of Collier County and the State of Florida. ', Water and sewer facilities constructed within platted 1•1'...",;; rights-of-way or within utility easements required by the % County shall be conveyed to-the County for ownership. • .' operation and maintenance purposes pursuant to appropriate . County Ordinances and regulations in effect at the time of conveyance. All water and sewer facilities constructed on private property end not required by the County to be located within utility easements shall be owned, operated ,;,,i and maintained by the Developer. his assigns or success rs. Upon completion of construction of the water and sewer • mg 033N4 us : .r; 32 < ; t A C , • ti .I'e . • emmnaaa . . _ s• ;f T - r, 5:.. facilities within the project. the facilities will be tested - T to insure they rout Collier County's utility construction '' ... requirements In effect at the time construction plans are '` approved. The above tasks must be completed to the satisfaction of the Utilities Division prior to placing any ! utility facilities, county owned or privately owned. Into ' service. Upon completion of the water and/or sewer 's• t _ facilities and prior to the issuance of Certificates of Occupancy for structures within the project the utility facilities shall be conveyed to the County, when required by . , the Utilities Division. pursuant to County Ordinances and Regulations In effe:nests:: t at eM tisha conveyanceis requested. a Y l µii • " B. All construction plans end technical specifications end f• • proposed plats. if applicable. for the proposed water distribution and sewage collection'and transmission • fadllUes must be reviewed and approved by the Utilities - Division prior to'oowaanament of construction. • .* •,. C. All customers connecting to the water distribution and sewage collection facilities will be customers of the County :, end will be billed by the County In accordance with the County's established rates. Should the County not be in a position to provide water and/or sewer service to the jr, . project, the water and/or sewer customers shell be customers of the interim utility established to serve the project • r . :;rf MN/ I * ...op ' ,- ..... . I1 4 : - i :- . ..... • .,; ,. .,-,•:..1.-• :5 . I 4 li ' :' /1 • ... r. .,., 1-; until the County's off-site water and/or sewer facilities i • ' • .' V.-: are available to serve the project. D. It Is anticipated that the County Utilities Division will ultimately supply potable water to meet the consumptive , r demand and/or receive and treat the sewage generated by this . . . project. Should the County system not be In a position to supply potable water to the project and/or receive the project's wastewater at the time development commences, the 4 , Developer, at his expense, will install and operate interim water supply and on-site treatment facilities and/or interim . , • ,. . on-site sewage treatment and disposal facilities adequate to % meet all requirements of the appropriate regulatory ,, ,, agencies. . !,1 -''.. E. An Agreement shall be entered into between the County and , ..; the Developer, binding on the•Ditveloper, his assigns or i 'i'• I i successors, legally acceptable to the County, prior to the . ii t•-,••• approval of construction documents for the proposed project, ., • .:. stating that: :t'• ; 1. The proposed water supply and on-site treatment 4. .• I .c.; ... facilities and/or on-site wastewater treatment and disposal facilities, If required. are to be constructed ,.. ss part of the proposed project and must be regarded as .,, Interim: they shotl be constructed to State and Federal ..,...7,. stat oalpv.lits e . • .. . ....... . . ........ ..... _ 77 : ;f.,'t'.1:. . ` .:71;, �'! standards and are to be owned. operated end maintained .. l_ t • -., . by the Developer. his assigns or successors until such : time as the County's off-site water facilities and/or rn off-site sewer facilities aavailable to service the wy,. •• * project. The interim treatment facilities shell supply '. services only to those lands owned by the Developer and S. ;• approved by the County for development. The utility facllitylles) may not be expanded to provide water and/or sewer service outside the development boundary .a • approved by the County without the written consent of ?'j County. the . :1.':3 r :k• 2. Upon connection to the County's off-site water ' '. facilities, and/or sewer facilities. the Developer, his -'4 assigns or successors shall abandon, dismantle and . remove from the site the interim water and/or sewage treatment facility and discontinue use of the water supply source. If applicable,in a manner consistent ',': with State of Florida standards. All work related with •' this activity shall be performed at no cost to the County. 3. Connection to the County's off-site water and/or sewer fri ` . facilities will be made by the owners, their assigns or + successors at no cost to the County within 90 days �[y `'f after such facilities became available. The cost of F' 1 J• . i• • d g{ mai Y ,. f .YLr a '.. '-..''.15.4.-- .4 J, „:,, ,,,.:.- „ .,. .,„, .__,,.....„.. 1 connection shall include, but not be limitd to, ail :rt> i. engineering design and preparation of construction • documents, permitting, modification or refitting of existing sewage pumping facilities or construction of new nester sewage pumping facilities, interconnection o3.: with County offalto facilities. outer and/or sewer r lines necessary to make the conneetionis), etc. ,4 C. At the Urns County off-site water and/or sewer facilities are available for the project to connect with, the following water and/or sewer facilities shall ' be conveyed to the County pursuant to appropriate : • County Ordinances and Regulations 1n effect st the ;;:`ai. , time: a. All water and/or sewer facilities constructed In '? ' . publicly owned rights-of-way or within utility easements required by the County within the . project limits required,to mince connection with '''' ' the County's off-site water and/or sewer ( 'g” I Y facilities: or. 1 ..t„ - b. All water and sewer facilities required to connect 1 • " .. with the project to the County's off-site water y' and/or sewer facilities when the en-sits water and/or sewer facilities are constructed en privet* ' f K' .iZ Il ,.,j a � •".' •'!t: { . I, : ; • property and not required by the County to be located within utility easements. Including but not limited to the following: I. Main sewage lift station and forcemein s interconnecting with the County sewer • c; fedlities•including ell utility easements .. necessary; 2. Water distribution facilities from the point • 1 t;�;: of connection with the County's water } • 0,-.- facilities to-the master water meter serving K, the project. Including all utility assonants fi • necessary. ••. ,.•'•+ 5. The customers served en an intense basis by the utility r system constructed by the Developer shall become •"~. customers of the County at the tine when County off- sits water and/or sewer facilities are available to t serve the project and such connection is mode. Prior to connection of the project to the County's off•slte ti water and/or sewer facilities the Developer, his t' -; assigns, or successors shall turn over to the County a '. complete list of the customers served by the Interim 1.- • utilities system and shall not compete with the County E } �. for the service of those customers. The Developer • 4 um 033► 121 • 14 i7 J } • t .• y . Ir, `}fL.. . ' 411 i .,.. ;,.--.- .;. ., • • • .:,. 7+� Y . , ,,i..,..,,ii-ii.._. . � irk ... . r "t V . 1•,... .' , .1, I 1 ‘ shall else provide the County with a detailed inventory .F... ` • of the facilities served within the project and the 4•.:;':.,,:. ' entity which will be,responsible for the water and/or 'is , • sewer service billing for the project. • y rag. S. Ali construction plans and technical specification i• `: ''....s ; related to connections to the County's off-site water ,1,\•.,.11..' and/or sewer facilities will be submitted to the r••,. !h Utilities Division for review and approval prior to �t of construction. - » .e 7. The Developer, his assigns ar summers agree to pay . :,;_ all system development charges at the time that Building Permits are required, pursuant to appropriate `, County Ordinances and Regulations In effect at the time ', of Permit request. This requirement shall be made known + to all prospective buyers of properties for which building permits will be required prior to the start of 1 building construction.j ti • ' S. The County will lease to the Developer far operation =r' and maintenance the water distribution andler sewage •.. collection and transmission system for the sue of '` $10.00 per year. when such system is not connected to _.4. the off-site water and/or sewer facilities owned and I i,,,•0•.•.:'•` ;1!:,:l `' ISK �rrt� 1r 4 ti.. f MIN 11111• -;q • A '1 • r� r. operated by the County. Terms of the lease shall be A . . determined upon completion of the proposed utility construction and prier to activation of the water ` supply, treatment and distribution facilities end/or the sewage collection, transmission and treatment facilities. The Lease. if required, shall remain in effect until the County can provide water and/or sower service through Its off-site facilities or until such time that bulk rate water and/or sewer service agreements are negotiated with the interim utility system serving the project. F. Data required under County Ordinance lie. 00-112 showing the availability of sewage service, must be submitted and approved by the Utilities Division prier to approval of the construction documents for the project. Submit a copy.of the approved DER permits for the sewage collection and transmission systems and the wastewater treatment facility to be utilized, upon receipt thereof. it f . . C. If an interim on-site water supply, treatment and transmission facility is utilized to serve the proposed project, it must be properly sized to supply average and peak day domestic demand, In.addition to fin flow demand at • a rate approved by the appropriate Fire Control District servicing the project area. t ; • slot uvea wA 311 • • • it tr• t. . • t fit • a' • — I « 4 . 1. w• i 4t' %. 11. Construction and ownership of the water and sewer t ! facilities. including any proposed interim water and/or sewage treatment facilities, shall be in compliance with all .: ;. Utilities Division Standards. Policies. Ordinances. J- Practices. etc. In effect at the.time construction approval is requested. ;:k.;-,:,! ',i- I. Detailed hydraulic design reports covering the water distribution and sewage collection and transmission systems , Er to serve the project must be submitted with the construction s documents for the project. The reports shall list oil i. . i t' design assumptions, demand rates and other factors pertinent 1 to the system under the consideration. ,,.,� • !. t;lh en tis County ha the ability is provide sewage treatment and disposal services, the Developer. his assigns er ' .>Y successors will be responsible to conned to these } facilities at a point to be established by the County. with . ii..: the Developer assuming all costs for the connection work to be performed. K. The County has not yet determind whether the Citygste • .f project will be designated as a treated sewage effluent receiving area. Prior to preparation of definitive central .'*•l'.•• NIR O33►;'d 124 1 Ir ........ ;` . 5, 4. :1' S 'i".::AAAr... t• • tj 4'; , i'4. irrigation plans for the Citygate project. appropriate input • shall be obtained from the county to insure that applicable county affluent use plans are complied with. If end when . t-:;-•E� the county designates the C1tygate project as a treated Y 1.;,'j sewage effluent receiving area. the Citygate Developer, his iassigns or successors. shall construct the necessary facilities for use of the treated sewage effluent for 1 irrigation purposes and potentially for fire.flow purposes. '' i 2 The Citygate developer may be assigned responsibility for providing ail required piping and pumping facilities from the County's point of delivery to the project. and may be required to provide wet weather storage facilities. as ".':' required by DER. consistent with the volume of treated , effluent to be utilized. The treated effluent distribution system. if required, shall be constructed pursuant to the r" findings of a detailed. county approved hydraulic design �, • report. The report shall list all design assumptions. ,j demand rates. and other factors pertinent to the distribution system. Treated effluent supplied to the project will be subject to the county's established rata .-- schedule. L. Prior to approval of construction documents by the Utilities Division, the Developer must present verification, pursuant to Chapter 367. Florida Statutes. that the Florida Public .4 ,. !1::..;• 6tlR 033 Pact 125 , F :r 41 ' . A' . . ; .* 1 I • . . 11111M.111111, r . • . .. ... . ,.. :ill • . 6! ... .• -, . ) . _ • ,. . . . , . 1 r. ...:. . *.. - . i '..`.- • •11. . . 1 ,. ,,•cr. 1. • - 1' :/,,- •• ••• Service Commission has granted territorial rights to the .. Developer to provide sewer andier water service to the , . ,,4... • project. if en Interim treatment fadlity Is required. until .• • .. the County can provide these services through its water and ' sewer facilities. .'Lt ...i. . . • • f.,.. - IA. No septic tanks are permitted to serve permanent commercial. ... . f '''' .7'A..4- -- industrial. or similar uses. Temporary septic tanks which -,'s...7• serve temporary sales facilities or other temporary use * .' . prior to the availability of central sewage treatment ''' •• , •- .i. facilities may be utilised In accord with F.D.E.R. standards. ., • .....,., i ' • '..:, ; i • c 477.. • . , N. Any establishment requiring a CCPH13 permit must submit plans . ».....;-•- •., .,...• , .. . for review and approval. . . . , • -,.' ' • : ,:li-'.• ., . . l .. ••,.? . 1 • ,'W '... 0. If a vegetative barrier is placed around the package .. . . treatment plant and/or land disposal area, the ESPCD . . . .. , recommends that it be located In a manner se It does not *. .4,::.'.. • affect the proper operation of the treatment process. • ,,. . .,. . .. .. 1 1j... .. P. The ESPCD recommends that the petitioner locate the land application site away from any drainage ditch and/or swats .:).•- -, , .. . :. that may affect the proper''y operation of the land disposal 1 ;-, - • . , site. V • i h,4'.., .1' sat 033Past126 'laa.: ' !*.•. 1 . .4:::-• 1 r .:7'::''1.... • '.A. ' ' • ' • . A. • ' '5 *'. 1..!5:5: • -'I: •5 .t,. . .. .._ 1 earxf•. ( -- kms. , � 'Y 47,17_ ., • f z •i f. ^ SECTION VII .y c _ RED COCKADED WOODPECKER MANAGEMENT PLAN Vit. The Red Cockaded Woodpecker [RCWi, MAK portraits. Is a protected species of pine forest dwelling wildlife. During planning of the . CitYgate project. several Red Cockaded Woodpecker nest trees were Identified on the site. and determination was made that a number of Red Cockaded Woodpeckers utilize some of the nest trees and forage on the pine forested portions of the Citygate sits, as well as on j: adjoining off site pine forested lands. A Red Cockaded Woodpecker Management Plan was prepared. Incorporated in. and approved as part of 'the Development of Regional Impact application. The elements of the plan have been incorporated In the Citywide Mester Development Plan . and this PUD document. The central feature of the Management Plan is an agreement to defer development of a 72± acre area which embraces "f`: the nest trees, a buffer of pine forest around the nest trees, and a c•i--t corridor of pine forest which connects the nest trees to each other . and to existing off-site pine forested lands on which the birds now orage. so long t 1 a.. ! as the birds continue their existing nesting pattern. 1,'; The 72_+ acre interim preserve area Is indicated un the Master R Development Pian. as are the nest tree locations and 1400 foot diameter • circles around each nest tree. After planning of the Cltygate project was initiated, a forest fire severely burned a large portion of the •.. Stix '' •• NU Orui 27 '. • tt.• a i . asoma EMI IMP ',Icer:• .. r:if • Cityg to site. Including approximately half of tie interim preserve area., Many of the pines in the burned area have died. and the Florida 'A.r • Forest Service advises that pine death will continue for several Y years. The long term Impact of the forest fire on utilization of the i area by Red Cockaded Woodpeckers cannot.be forecast with accuracy. but annual monitoring of the birds will provide the needed information. The following management/monitoring activities are en Integral part of ite Red Cockaded Woodpecker Management Plan and of this PUD document: ' i I. Prior to issuance of construction approval for the streets. -.4 drainage facilities, utilities. etc. in a project development phase, a Red Cockaded Woodpecker survey 4, utilizing approved methodology wil be conducted to insure that the birds have not established nest cavities In the planned construction.area. The survey shall occur within $0 - days of the start of.construction. and if it is determined x • ' '• that Red Cockaded Woodpecker nest cavities have been ;• established In the construction area, determination shall be tmeds by the agencies responsible for Red Cockaded Woodpecker , I. protection laws as to the necessity of modifying the Red {, ; `. Cockaded Woodpecker Management Plan. :;'•d•• 2. Annual Red Cockaded Woodpecker surveys utilizing approved t methodology will be undertaken until five years after final lift w4 2 • 1 ,.•1 i �t4 �� s ( f' . r.. . o, i 1111i . 1 • .......L ' -t • tet:.• '• f I - t buildout of the Citygets project. with results of the annual ! .P • ,, •, surveys to be furnished to the Florida Came and Fresh Water k.-. Fish Commission, the Southwest Florida Regional Planning � . • Council. and Colder County within 30 days of survey x . . completion. • ., 3. AMialeuca and other exotic vegetation within the Red Cockaded Woodpecker preserve area and elsewhere on the Citygete site will be eradiated. thus significantly -:$: enhancing the quality of RCW forage area on sits. 1 .' •. Excessive undergrowth will be controlled by burning and/or , by use of mechanical equipment. 5. Pine trees having a DBH of$ Inches or more, located outside E -1 , - the RCW preserve but within the required yard and buffer i , '. ' . . areas In the remainder of the site, will be conserved to - r a provide additional RCW forage area. c:' • S. Lands within the RCW preserve ares may be utilized for '• i'. limited recreational purposes such as walkways. jogging/7°,-41. trails. picnic facilities. etc.. so long as disturbance to E 1 . • native vegetation is minimal and the recreational activities avoid the RCW nest trees. it -J4•••.. r /'dr,.; INC 033n4120 {. 6 , 'f ft. t. • i:l•-. 't I . MINIM is t,:' ., • - y► il 0 , -.1 1,..• • }•' rye i 'Afs",,, i }.fix 1 • ,., ' 40.=, 7. Underground utilities and surface drainage awai ' ts may cross , � i� the RCW preserve area. • t 4.f•'!' it. The preserve area will be posted with signs which indicate +- 'f that it Is an RCW preserve and that disturbance of the birds w.�,k • ' is prohibited and unlawful. F : II. Proposals to modify the Citygat:a Red Cockaded Woodpecker Managment Plan may be submitted at any time. Such proposals t 7"i; shall be supported by a current survey of on-sits Red V. Cockaded Woodpecker nesting and foraging patterns. and such . additional information as Is required to evaluate the . '. proposed Management Plan modification. TM rationale for ' ,,- authorising lands to be renwved from the RCW preserve area fiv` may include abandonment or the nest trees by the birds ;` • and /ora change in the character of the pine forest forage area, resulting'in a loss of the habitat characteristics � ,kS required by the RCW. L ''' Proposals to modify the Mrnagemant Plan shell be submitted . to Collier County as an amendment to the Citygata PUO, with t. tcopies to' the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council 4' t; 1' and Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. The l : Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council and/or the t ``, Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission may Provide comments and recommendations to Collier County proposed Management Plan modification. .r. ISK 0110 Paci 130.. x� j `•. IIIIII I'll I. i, 1 J]j. i ,i `4 .. ..-4;•, The Planning/Zoning Directo'shall prepare a recommendation • t , regarding the proposed Management Plan modifkation: an t advertised public hearing shall be held by the Board of County Commissioners; and upon a finding of suitability the . Board of County Commissioners may. by a majority vote. authorize the requested Management Plan modification. • . r.,,, ; The Florida Gams and Fresh Water Ptah Commission his ,`,•: recommended to the Southwest Florida Regional Planning • . Council that a regional plan be developed which will result • • in the public acquisition of geographically suitable wildlife habitat when is comparable to amount and character to wildlife habitat which is lost to the process of urbanization within the region. Commission wildlife biologists have stated that approximately 233 acres of the 2 . 237 acre Citygate sits have the characteristics of Red Cockaded Woodpecker habitat. The Commission wildlife biologists have stated their ezpectatiai that upon development of the Citygate site and surrounding lands, the ,1:,• existing Red Cockaded Woodpecker population will abandon the area. In spite of the establishment of the Citygste Red Cockaded Woodpecker preserve area and associated Red Cockaded Woodpecker management commitments. In the event a 1 h, regional wildlife habitat acquisition plan is adopted. the purpose of which is to mitigate wildlife habitat las to urban development in the region, the Cttygatte project shall 47 `' • toot .033►t•�131 b ley.t' . • . e .". M111111111101 WIMP i t; .ic�Y • • ' .•. be subject to such Impact fees or other Implementation i '.r measures so aro lawfully enacted for the purpose of • Implementing the regional plan. { t • i, n'• f. • [_i • ,. t' • ;r • � Y • i •7 i • r.t T; t �. ik E' sag .033Fi'd132 48 .w. I 1 . i.' ';7.,"*. .; •,- ' ki cp CIM lin mr c I i l'41 . . .• _ lilittlit 1 ' ..friAlill 1 _• I' ' /' "i- F=i LI iiiNti •-ivy ioli--•-------- ilif Ilk mi la _- i 1 �'- ,30 A r t. ., , • ' rIP r..• W d s tits U ia„ A I I "::-4,, 4 , M.1\, 1 • . . I X us 1 } r .. 4:11 O IP • t /Toil 1 7 7.' '. 11----0 ,.. :.......45:cri:4., 1 *OF i I ii i: lit t';r A z r • \ c / 1 C:41 g • wsw.tr,119119911119194 i•.. • r _- _-- Al .,www .nwr.lUr �,...I., ` www MVO* W {.C / . = • t • i. s ., :. • i t „7r. ,,. .:,. t —4111111 .• f ~WOO ergo'ergo M.L.- e... y+1nwNV•Erma wee- `j; ,• . wsewn t.a+•+ww w 10199199/+IP 10111111111 /� tt Y° 1111999991191 w se 1.aor.w•Owe Tr 1 • 11191919191190pewm11r1••wM ew1 1..vamoose•1w. to °:�•:.�. p�� y, . ,}3t5 •rh j l :b �'I • • lc • • w 1 1 • -i s ..• • !w -.8'; all NM III . : j 7 .t, I 2. 2. Y g X l Y 2 2 • i, lir :— li 111. II. I. 4 . I. 4 I. 1 I .,.. i -. 4" g I i 1 a I S I I I I • . 3 "q" iN r . � • t i i %• •. - r • t h p ' ts ; • I I I - 0 M ' N I N N) a 1 . • w r r N 0 a N N N NI X h'1 r " 4 •. r r r r a a N N r el X • :.'i r 1 •. •. M 2 1 •N 1 I` _ • A awl II. O. r r i 1 N . i i /1 w , 5" A / A • M • e a as g 4 ie.',....- . • , , ... i 3 4 . , , ; ,, :,, , . . .7,,.- I r V 11 71"'.,..'0.:. Ill 1 i i 11 il i III 11 ii 1.1 il 1! .• . .. ..„...•...,.„,.., t.,,.. ,} ' .. 'x • 4 . .,soft rvt 134 �� . . . ' fri%, •;. se • • ^i .• r r i . -if is -.f. ; , w I .,,,.. , . a12 omr E 1 3 • lg. I , :,,-..,,.., . • . i . . fi , . ...„ .... , _ . • ,• ,,,.., . .. . . 1 •11 .1 . .iisi ,, ..,,.%„:, 7. gli 2 M ". 4 11. • i 1 a I , -.,if .'r fi •..... s. • ljiIIIluijJfi . 4,T..'.. . szq . , . -: a. ft 1 ; • . , ' ill ' • ,T,4 . . - , ., ,,,,.0 1 . .. . . ..„, ,,, . n NI g 1 1 .. , , ?1 p....,..! 'Po ... ... ... . . . M NI a X i I if 111 I I- , thi! : :' �t.. : ? : zl� ^ • V 1 IIh1 :: .. .. .. 1 ar r of w M ` ` 4: • øiJ . • 110 f A N ' s "' Mil3! 8 1' t. 11111 • ,;` _ ; ;. N a . Oft P. 11114 ..1111 0.16 '•�r. vOn f i • „ . •' 11 r. ► WI ar W }1 ' 1 Qp • Z ' 1N¢ 033►Y4 ki et I- • 1 mum WON ► V' • N.r`. (3) These sales and services will primarily serve interstate highway ' travelers and employees or businesses within the project. as opposed to functioning as a neighborhood shopping center. • ( 3 The office category Is limited to offices which are principal uses. and does not Include offices which are ancillary,to and incorporated in other land uses, i.e. administrative offices within a light • manufacturing or research and development firm. Most of the offices . . k will have extensive interaction with businesses external to the ,k; project, but some will primarily function as servants of other land ;,� uses within the project. ' '" IS) Parking space and employee estimates were largely based on ITE r: standards and averages cited by Urban Land institute publications. • • When definitive published parking end/or employee standards for a • specific land use were not available, the estimates were based on published standards for the most similar uses. The estimated e employees include those who normally spend all or most of the work day , within the project, i.e.:office workers, sales el. Industrial workers; employees •xho shuttle to and from it place of employment • during the work day. i.e. delivery truck crews: and employees who , seldom visit the project. i.e. manufacturer's field representatives. It is anticipated that many of the uses within the project will be . served by common parking pools which increase the efficiency of parking space utilization. The employees estimated for service • station, hotel/motel. restaurant/lounge. and perhaps other uses will • be spread over two end. in some cases. three shifts within a 24 hour period. • � -, ti. • ). •!t.' .. t . ' x. • w . j fry' ,7 .1,;„~ T. S. a % :'" DEVELOPMENT ORDER se- 2 z,:1-43.' RESOLUTION 116-,221 f • . DEVELOPMENT ORDER OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, Et[ : FLORIDA FOR CITYGATE CODE PARR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT LOCATED IN SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: WHEREAS, Vines and Associates, Agent, for Citizen's a Southern Trust Company (Florida), National Association as `.,: Trustee for Land Trust 95360 Applicant, filed on April 15, 1967 rs,° with the County of Collier an Application for Development - ,- , Approval (ADA) of a Devslo �.,, _ pmsnt of Regional Impact (DRI) known 1. '1- as, Citygate Commerce Park Planned Unit Developunt in V.:_;:.f accordance with Section 310.06(6), 7lerida Statute': and 1" WHEREAS, vines and Associates have obtained all necessary . approvals and conditional approvals from thev various Collier t ; 4 • . . County agencies, departments, and boards required as a condition to Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning and DRI approval: and ', WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners as the governing t '4::...' body of the unincorporated area of Collier County having 11..,,,,,. .:. 1 jurisdiction pursuant to Chapter 310:06 ylorlda Statute', is !, authorised and eapovered to consider Applications for i. Development Approval (ADA) for Odvelopsents of Regional Impactt , !'. and WHEREAS, the public notice requirements of Chapter 360 r VI..: parietal Statutes and the Collier County Zoning Ordinance have. bean satisfied: and i • , :-: WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission has • ,_.I•, reviewed and considered the report and recommendation of the .Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (SNFRPC) and held a ': public hearing on the AM on November 3, isle, and r'`-. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has passed 0tdinance 16--_13._ which rezoned the subject property to PUD, and ,,.% • 1NR .% 1NR Q3►a4 137 , mom 4111111 I -•;•• • . 1 j •,. . WHEREAS, Citygate Commerce Park ADA is also part of a • n f overall rezoning application by the developer; and the issuance of a development order pursuant to Chapter 380.06, porta steatia, does not constitute a waiver of any powers or rights �� .;.• regarding the issuance of other development permits by the County or stater and WHEREAS, on December 13, 1908 the Board of County , .' Commissioners, at an open public hearing in accordance with • Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. considered the application for • Development of Regional impact submitted by Vines and Associates, Agent; the report and recommendations of the +i Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council (swPRPC); the certified record of the documentary and oral evidence presented • • to the Collier County Planning Commissions the report and recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission; the recommendations of Collier County staff and Advisory Boards; and 'the comments upon the record made before this Board of County Cboissioners at said meeting, hereby makes the following ,2 ,;; • t' `. Findings of Pacts and Conclusions of Law: yr FINDINGS OF FACT 1 • • f a{.1 1. The real property which is the subject of the ADA is t �. legally described as set forth in the Planned Unit xs r'r. Development Document for Citygate Commerce Park attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and by reference made a part hereof. • A. The application is in accordance with Section 310.06(6), Florida Statutes. ty . 7.. 3. The applicant submitted to the County an ADA and sufficiency responses known as composite Exhibit B, a .r and by reference made a part hereof, to the extent that they are not inconsistent with the terms and conditions of this Order. : •'. p sisi 033 rya lag .'. -2_ ... MOM sm.r ORM, if .. 1. The applicant proposes the development of Citygate Commerce Park Planned Unit Development for 287.187 acres which includes* 90,000 square fat of .4 .. commercial, 836,000 square feet of office, 1,920,000 4 square feet of Industrial, 250 hotel/motel rooms, and 80,000 square feet of public, utilitarian, .'4. ., recreational and educational space. S. The Development is consistent with the report and recommendations of the sWFRPC submitted pursuant to Subsection 180.06 (12), ylorida statutes. I • 6. The development viii not unreasonably interfere with ; :^ the achievement of the objectives of the adopted Stats t4. : Comprehensive Plan applicable to the area. + .. 7. A comprehensive review of the impact generated by the • • development has been conducted by the appropriate v:.. County departments and agencies and by the SUFRPC. S. The development is not in an area designated an Area of Critical State Concern pursuant to the provisions of Section 380.05, ylorida statutes_ as amended. 9. The development is consistent with the land development regulations of Collier County. 1 10. •••J. = =1144, •f ,, Y. Y;1. V1.17: wo.. ��- 7 The project is located•within the designated Urban Area by the 1983, collier County Comprehensive Plan. The 231 acres east of the Florida Power i Light MAL) j . easement has been amended (Ordinance 88-33) to an ; • Industrial Land Use Designation. The area vest of the i i .:� PPM easement (37 acres) is designated as Interchange Commercial. �•':►. COHCLOBIOWS or um SO0, TAERETORR, SE IT RtsOLVED by the Board of County `.: Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, in public meeting, duly constituted and assembled December 13, 1988, that the C2lygats Commerce Park Application for Development Approval submitted by Vines and Associates, Agent, is hereby ordered xA... _3_ ff s • t , ` 'Inti* p oved subject to the following conditions as recommended by ,• the WRFC or in response to their recommendation and the • ' ' eomsitments specified in the POD which are hereby adopted as ' 14": conditions of approval of this Development Order: 16 &1 ACED rrn (MUM a. The control elevation for the overall surface water j y `' management system shall be based on the historical . .; . average wet season water table of this site. b. Each stage of the two-stage surface water management system shall amply with the South Florida Water • Management District's *Basis of Review". • c. For those uses that produce hazardous materials, the '- applicant shall prepare and submit a Hazardous Materials Management Plan to Collier County, Florida ' Department of Environmental Regulation (PDER), South iFlorida Water Management District (SFNMD), and Collier ,_• County Division of Emergency Management for review and approval, prior to any certificates of occupancy being d. The applicant shall coordinate with Collier County, FDER and the MUD in the development of a surface . water monitoring maintenance and•ssapiirg program to help ensure achievement of state water quality ' standards, as spacified' in' Chapter 17-3, j-A-C. ' r S. A11 commitments made by the applicant within the ADA • �. and subsequent sufficiency dodusents, not in conflict with the above recommendations, shell be incorporated as conditions for approval.. k.4.-i. 2. =Mt ` ' The proposed project will be an all electric project and ~ will increase the energy demand in the Region. The applicant has committed in the ADA to variety of ',, conservation measures to help reduce the energy impact of the project. These measures shall be adhered to by the applicant. . ! ..-•'-•'' a. ' The applicant or his successor shall be fully i responsible. for sits-related roadway and intersection improvements required within.. the Citygate commerce Park DRi. The applicant shall be required to pay the ill full cost for any site-related intersection improvements (including but not limited to e4 signalization, turn lanes, and additional throughte lanes) found to be necessary by Collier County for t project's access intersections onto CR-9S1 and i. Landfill woad throughout all phases of the development. Collier County ihd the applicant, shall limit,the number of access reside from Citygate to II CR-951 in order'to preserve capacity on CR-951, a } .• regional roadway. b. Adequate commitments shall be provided by the applicant for the necessary transportation • iaproveseit including design and engineering. • utility cquisition, construction, construction contract administration, 4 • ' ill . —. • 9 : . r t•. it . 1 �, and construction inspection necessary to maintain peak 16 r season/peak hour LOS "D" for the following • rr�-t.. t ,� .. significantly impacted regional roadways through project buildout in 20031 1 ;'+, F • 0-9S1 dales of Capri Read1 ;;; ; . ' ,.r -r• - Vanderbilt Beach Road to Golden Gate Boulevard • „-; - Citygate North Entrance to 1-75 0 _ - Z-75 to Davis Boulevard • ( p • .?-•• - Davis Boulevard to CR-164 (Rattlesnake Hammock • ' '.s ' . Road) • 4'` r:+ •. CR-$4d f !tale! Read t I ;-•.---4,.117. ) ;a.. - . Airport-Pulling Road to Z-75 i � • CR-IS& tP na Ridee Road1.„ . il . - Airport-Pulling Road to Z-75 jph14 (Davis Beuievardl I ' .g„,,, -!�;; - Airport-PullingRoad to County Barn Road . - Radio Road to CR-95i w••41' • c. Adequate commitments shall be provided by the applicant for the necessary improvements, including ., but not limited to, right-of-way, cost of r, signalisation, turn lanes, and other improvements deemed necessary by Collier County or the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), as appropriate, to maintain level of service "D" on a peak season/peak hour basis for the following significantly impacted }• off-site regional intersections through project buildout: ';•' CR-951 at SR-SI (Davis Boulevard) ,.�?;'- .• CR-951 at Golden Gate parkway l • CR-951 at Z-75 rasps - CR-951 at Rattlesnake Hammock Road I. ':. '. ,.q -' CR-9S1 at Landfill Road (also a site entrance) ` SR-S4 at Airport-Pulling Road SR-S1 at Radio Road d. The timing for the initiation of the improvesenta . v./ outlined in recommendations "b" and "c" above shall be made at the time that a road segment is found to exceed LOS "D" on a peak season/peak hour basis, or a ? road intersection is found to exceed a peak hour level of service "D". Service level determination shall be .., sadaCollier County or FDOT, as-appropriate. To r. determine the existing levels of service on regional S- facilities.and the need for isprovesents in a timely -- manner, the applicant shall submit an annual monitoring report to Collier County, Naples Area • (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organisation (MPO). the Collier County Transportation Department, FOOT, and the Southwest Florida Regional Planning .., Council for'review. The first monitoring report shall • ' be sublitted one year after the issuance of the !':? development order for:Citygate DRI. Reports shall be • submitted annually until buildout of the project, and • { :� at a minimus, shall contain turning movements and i ' - traffic counts taken at the access points to the project, turning movements at each of the regional 1 - . SOK wd4i I. -5- 1111 • {ti MOW OEMS emeses • i ; .r x � intersections listed above in recommendation "c", and' ' a calculation of the existing level of service at these intersections and on the road segments indicated above in item Abs. ',; i' The levels of service shall be calculated according to s,f-::': current professional standards and should provide an indication of when peak hour/peak season LOS D is ' - expected on impacted roadways and/or peak hour LOS "DP 4- on impacted intersections. It will provide updated '.. information to more accurately forecast project • buildout traffic and total traffic for determination " of proportional share. . f; . e. During each Phase, prior to the approval of any land 1; use proposed in any subsequent future Phase, the applicant shall submit for County, Regional, and TROT review, an evaluation of the transportation level of 1service conditions in the area and the anticipated x impacts of each phase of Citygate. If this evaluation indicates that the assumptions on which the 7 4. Developsent order was based are being exceeded and that a substantial deviation had occurred or rill 4r occur during any Phase a full assessment of DEI . • • q%iestion 21 will be required. f. Based on the staff transportation assessment of • significant project impacts, construction of the following transportation improvements shall he needed Ai. prior to, or coincident with, development of Citygate . P. Commerce Park DRI (1988-2003) if peak season/peak at hour L08 MD" conditions..are to be maintained on regional road segments with peak hour level of service "D" in regional intersections. .:1: - .;,. Regional Roadways and local roadways (including: .� intersaction/interchange improvements) t (1910-19901 - r bassi [Isles of Canri Road) s e' ' 'i': ;=s-favis Blvd. to CR-864 Widen to four lanes with a ,�' - (Rattlesnake Hassock Road) �ian (segmient is programmed ,'Y. phase TT (1911-12941 • - YMa additional improvements are indicated. _ 1 • • ' :`4 . R tri [19991991) :✓W� a5i /Was of Capri Roadi ';'.11,t )49- ' :7.- ''S' •`. 4.45 to Davis Boulevard Widen to six lanes with a r e f;' e�. median - `t -fAlto84 [Davis Blvd.% . / ,s nrportty �1 Road to Widen nto fourlanes with a • '1.4.• - . • ,1: 44tadio Road to CR-951 Widen to tour lanes with a .::. pian •• is u IIK 033m142 -a.. • .. .. NM j `�. s i tV f1998-2O001 'i'a additional improvements are indicated. ,.,* ndicated. `' , 1 f `� 'fhase V f2e01-2OO1 - t, ' „ M .Vahrbilt Beach Rd. to Widen to four lanes with a :! G .krlden Cat (- goe Boulevard median i. 4 " :,, aCitygate Worth Entrance to Widen to six lanes with a ;4: j t: i-7S Radian :, I r ,,tom abavis Blvd. to CR-$64 Widen to six lanes with a ,:;Rattlesnake Hassock Road) radian .., „:,. mala (isaakaiaa Road1 jt..,-,Atirport-pulling Rd. to 1-73 Widen to six lanes with a s Y•i� median 4 • • :. i 1 : lb=aft (Pine tidaa Roadt ii' ` raAitport-Pulsing Road to 1-73 Widen to six lanes with a '; median :' ' 4 ty Barn Road to CR-SS1 Widen to four lanes with a '. 1''` median c+ ` . Motet The listing above assumes that iaprovanents required ` in an earlier se areprovided in that phase.N 4y Y .*. g. The rug? shall be involved in reviewing improvement -♦ designs and the identification of appropriate costs % for improvements on the State Highway system to be used in calculating the applicant's proportionate ` share. These costs shall include-all aspects of required improvements including design, utility i-11 relocation, drainage, construction and other related / costs. :. ' h. Prior to builds nq construction south of the planned ' east/west road abutting the County water treatment . plant and west of the Florida power & Light =: transmission line easement, or no later than i months rfrom the date of approval of this Development Orderf :. /DOT shall be consulted in order that a determination • C` can be made of the necessity to reserve 1-7S interchange enlargement area for right-of-way ' • acquisition by utilisation of Chapter 337, Florida statutes. • 1. As to each phase of development and prior to 1. . conaenceaent of each phase of development either of I . the following conditions shall provide adequate ti • 7" tit 03 3► 143 . 1 ), .t ..1111.. army MEM ;:s i t . 11 r -''. :a• commitments for improvements indicated above to •+. c,....ii,' significantly impacted regional and local roadways and t 7 'P interactions E (1) If annual monitoring reports its cont rm thattraffic •t ' volumes on the road segments or intersections above exceed LOS *Dw peak• season/peak hour and the project is utilizing more than Si of the • respective level of service capacity, then , ;, building permits for any future phase shall not be granted until funding of the needed s• improvements for that phase is committed and construction has commenced: Building permits for e the current phase shall be granted provided the f.. level of service of the road segments and intersections above does not exceed LOS Et or • ' '#'� (2) The transportation impacts to the roads and Ci ' intersections above shall beappropriately ' addressed consistent with Southwest Florida - , Regional Planning Council policies and with the i minimum mitigative measures proposed by the Florida Department of Community Affairs in Rule 9J-2.0255Florida Administrative Cod Transportation Policy. The Regional Planning Council shall be consulted during the calculation • of proportional share and/or pipelining of regional road improvements pursuant to the DCA rule. In the DCA rule formula, *trips existing" • shall be defined to mean all non-DPI trips on the Y- roadway (or intersection) existing at the same ties gas the DRI trips in the :proportionate share • 4111 : .• calculation. The resultant DCA proportionate share formula shall be applied to the total costs 4: of necessary roadway and intersection improvements. 4. '''� a. Golden Polypody Ferns and Butterfly Orchids shall be � { relocated to appropriate protected areas on-site. b. The 2.47 acres of wetlands preserve shown on the 6•+s:>: approved Master Development Plan shall be preserved. H e. Prior to issuance of construction permits for an +i" approved development phase of the citygate project, a . ,A. Red Cockaded Woodpecker (RCW) survey utilising • previously approved methodology will be conducted to insure that RCWs have not established nest cavities in t•• the development area. The survey shall occur within ' 60 days of the start of construction, and if it is I determined that RCW nest cavities have been • established in the construction area, determination shall be made by the agencies responsible for RCM protection laws as to the necessity of modifying the -• RCW Management Plan. ` =4" d. Annual RCM surveys, utilising the previously approved t :f`. •' methodology, will be undertaken until 5 year after ',I . final build-out of the Citygate project, with results • j .: . of the annual RCM surveys to be reported to Game and Fish Commission (arc), U.S. Fish Wildlife Service ' , • (USIMS), 8WFRPc, and Collier County within 30 days of . survey completion. • • . '-0 mg O33Pist144 s liil n 4:, . .4 JM 1 1 . Ea ' :'31: - e. Proposals to modify the Citygate RCM Management Plan say be submitted at any time. such proposals shall be ^.' .supported by a current survey of on-site RCM nesting and foraging patterns, and such additional information j • • as is required to evaluate the proposed Management Plan codification. Upon determination that the on site colonies in any area sought to be removed from RCM Preserve Area have been abandoned, and any • t - required off xite. sitigation is being provided, appropriate modification to the RCN Management Plan shall be approved. f. Melaleuca and other exotic vegetation within the RCN preserve area and elsewhere on the Citygate site will be eradicated, thus significantly enhancing the '1: • quality of RCM forage area on site. 1 ti ` q. Excessive undergrowth will be controlled by burning ;j and/or by use of mechanical equipment. • ' ' h. Pine trees having a Diameter Breast Height (050) of a` or more, located outside the-ECU preserve but within • the required yard and buffer areas in the remainder of the site, will be conserved to provide additional ECM t�: forage areas. East of the mt. easement in the vicinity of the RCM preserve area as identified on the .t Master Plan the minimum parcel sizes are to be 2 (- acres: minimus yards are front 50' rear 50' side 23•: not More than 20% of these required yards say be devoted to vehicular drives and parking spaces: at ` least 30% of each development site must be devoted to ' natural and/or installed landscape areas. ' i. Lands within the RCM preserve area say be utilized for • t. limited recreational purposes such as walkways, jogging trails, picnic facilities, etc. so long as . disturbance to native vegetation is minimal and the � , recreational activities avoid the RCM nest trees. j. Underground utilities and surface drainage 'wales mar . - cross the RCN preserve •area. k. The preserve area shall ba'posted with signs which indicate that it is an ACM preserve and that ' disturbance of the birds is prohibited and unlawful.' u 1. When a regional litigqation:plan is approved and 1 implemented the applicant's'plan shall be subject to ' [ t the provisions thereof. Y.. s. All other commitments made by the Applicant either in the Citygate ADA or sufficiency documents, not in conflict with the above recommendations, shall be - incorporated as conditions for development order approval. . �� ;;` .. ..0-;..*, .1. w ' o-I • -- + i• -' .'i` -• a. No commercial, Service X i D and/or Industrial development shall be alloweuntil a package treatment '; dppllant or ntral processing plant is on line to serve tib project. • b. The applicant shall provide assurance that any `.•'l=" hazardous wastewater will be, segregatedfrom everyday • � � "g' wastewater. f,. C. If percolation ponds are used, they suet fully comply • Y... with ram Standards. •. ''��y :4• a. tire sprinklers shall be included throughout the •: project'as required by applicable-:fire codes. • '. . b. The project shall participate in lawfully adopted, generally applicable fair share-requirements to fund _t fire control.district facility, equipment and ,+- - personnel needs in order to mitigate project impacts. c. The applicant shall meet with appropriate fire district representatives during site plan review in order to incorporate,any required features into the overall project design. , L , + 7. IOLID:VAITS2 a. The applicant and subsequent tenants-of the project V� shall investigate methods of reducing solid waste • volume. b. .. The applicant and subsequent tenants shall identify the proper on-site handling and temporary storage a- • procedures for any hazardous waste that may be generated on-site, in accordance with local, regional, ir 1 : state and federal hazardous waste programs. . .;;,. S. XbRU TLR PPLY s ` ' .. ' • • a. The applicant shall consider the utilization of ,.d • Mxeriscape" in the final landscape design for this �_'� .project. This design application should help to further reduce irrigation requirements for this DRI. b. Nater conservation measures and practices shall be 1,.: utilized in the Citygate Commerce Park project. At a minimum, water conservation devices described in the .a'. Nater Conservation Act ,(Chapter 551.14 Tlorida atatut.$) must be used, landscape irrigation shall be • . restricted to the hours of S p.m. to 9 a.m., and c non-potable water sources should be utilized for ..r_I irrigation where possible. • •:.1 . ii • 1! K 033►rai46 • .,>' .I�. I _ Imo T41 , . . .', ` • ' a. The development shall satisfy the requirements of any ..`•- ,. . Ordinance, which also requires other developments not • :- e subject to Chapter 210.06, jiorida statutes procedures ;;j to participate, to. contribute its proportionate share needed to accommodate the impacts of the developaentl or <4` b. Pursuant to Chapter 260.06(16), Florida statutes, the applicant may be subject to credit for contributions, . construction, expansion, or acquisition of public if''.., facilities, if the developer is also subject by local ordinance to impact fees or exactions to stet the sane • needs. The local government and the developer nay enter into a capital contribution front-ending agreement to reimburse the developer for voluntary contributions in excess of his fair share. c. The developant phasing schedule presented within the ADA and as adjusted to the date of development order =Xapproval with phase endings nodified as follows II- 1996, Phase II - 1997, Phase III - 2000, Phase IV - 2003, Phase V - 2006, shall be incorporated as a condition of approval. If development order conditions and applicant commitments incorporated within the development order to mitigate regional impacts, are not:carried out as indicated to the i,. -extent or in accordance with the timing schedules specified within the development order and this • • phasing schedule, then this shall be presumed to be a substantial deviation for the affected regional issue. 10. P.U.D.'nmc[ncEIIT: The approved Citygate PUD document and Master Development " Plan, as those documents may be officially modified from i.; time to time, are hereby incorporated in and Made a part of this Development Order and are entitled Exhibit "A", t attached hereto. y =-1.:',!- BE IT FURTulR RESOLVED, by the Board, of County Commissioners of .- l' . Collier County that: , . ... 1. All commitments and ispact mitigating actions provided by the applicant in 'the Application for Development Approval and supplemental documents and the Application for Public Rearing for rezoning and .� supplemental documents that are not in conflict with H. conditions.or stipulations specifically enumerated above are hereby adopted by this Development Order by reference. 'i`.. 2. The Development services Director shall be the local ;. . official responsible for assuring compliance with the . Development Order. • 1'.' : % UK 033P1447 -.-.if • • • r, ',..1;s74'-'.'--M«-;••- .01.' •.. -It- __. ...� ems= saw r l.• L e. 2. This Development Order shall remain in effect for the duration of the project. However, in the event that • significant physical development has not commenced within five (5) years from the date of final approval of the Development Order, development approval will terminate and this development order shall no longer be effective. For purposes of this requirement �}, • "significant physical development" does not include roads, drainage or landscaping but does include construction of buildings or installation of utilities and facilities such as sewer and water lines. This time period say be extended by the Board of County Commissioners upon request by the Developer in the event that uncontrollable circumstances delay the v commencement of development. .% 4. Pursuant to Section 380.06 (15) (c)3, Tlorida statute (1987), this project is exempt from down Boning or intensity or density reduction for a period of seven (7) years from the date of adoption of the Development '5 . Order, subject to the conditions and lisitations of that section of the Florida Statutes, provided that physical development commences within five (5) years as provided in Section 3 hereof. S. The applicant or its successor(s) in title to the subject property shall submit a report annually, commencing one year from the effective date of this development order,. to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, the Southwest Florida ., Regional Planning Council, and the-Department of Cosmunityy Affairs. This report shall contain the information required in Section 93-2.025(6), Floridaa - ,, . Administrative-Code. .. Failure to submit the annual " report shall be governed by Subsection 380.06 (18), ylorida Statutes. 6. Subsequent requests for development permits shall not 1 require further review•pursuant to section 380.06, ylorida statutes.. unless it is found by the Board of `' County Commissioners of Collier County, after due . notiand hearing, that one or more of the following 1 : presents a. A substantial deviation from the terms or t conditions of this development order, a ' substantial deviation to the project development ri5 phasing schedule, or substantial deviation from 4• the approved development plans which create a reasonable likelihood of adverse regional impacts or Other regional iapacts,which were not c.%, evaluated in the review by the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council; or ;• 2 b. An expiration of the period of effectiveness of this development order as provided herein. i ": y. . r7M'31 33 `" . . • rjQ' r•. . _J i .1 .t 411 �� Upon a finding that either of the above is presented, • rt;, i. the Board of county Commissioners of Collier County shall order a termination of all development activity until such time as a new DRI Application for Development Approval has been submitted, reviewed and approved in accordance with Section 310.06, Florida 1-'t ,etaW`. 7. The approval granted by this Development order is . limited. Such approval shall not be construed to �t • obviate the duty of the applicant to comply with all other applicable local, state or federal permitting "'' procedures. S. The definitions contained within Chapter 310.06, Florida Statute', shall control the interpretation and . ' construction of any terms of this Development Order. • 9. This Order shall be binding upon the Developer, its • assignees or successors in interest. 10. It is understood that any reference herein to any - .¢:' governmental agency shall be construed to seen any : future instrumentality which may be created or - , designated or successor in interest to, or which + otherwise possesses any of the powers and duties of any referenced governmental agency in existence on the F.: ; effective date of this order. • 11. In the event that any portion or section of this Order is determined to be invalid, illegal, or • - Unconstitutional by a court or agency of competent li:: jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner effect the remaining portions of this Order which shall regain in full force and.effect. . . 12. This resolution shall become•affective as provided by ' Law. *:. 12. Certified copies of this order are to be sent -•.;. immediately to the Department of Community Affairs, • 'f ,' and Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council. DULY PASSED AND ADOPTED this 13th day of • December , MS.. iDATE: December 13. 1908 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLI COUNTY, F IDA . .2.�ll ..• .- ` . EY:�� K l' 4. . ,a211424 :i:'.••°fi - '• _ •. Deputy Clerk • -.' ,.1-, .. C. s '' j jpv'p•AS 44 ' AID LEGAL surricis$cY N. STUDENT • i ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORNEY •li: ' re C3?YCkTE RESOLUTION ,NK 03$141149it w I. il':','",....,,''s-. el ', •:h•. I ,: • t A ; t _ 7 Y • 4 ,f 1 ''retA1tL OP FLORIDA ) i _-�.' COUHTY Or COLLIES ) •: I. JAMES C. GILES. Clerk of Courts in and for the 1 ` '` twentieth Judicial Circuit. Collier County. Florida. do 1hereby certify that the foregoing is a true copy of: I. • S. Ordinance No. 88-83 and E i r , Development Order is-!/Resolution 20-300 ( ti 4s i. ,:!-c3 %bieb was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 1 ' :s,. 13th day of December. 1988. during Regular Session. .�;< } tlltl[Etit sy hand and the official seal of the Board of e • r i ' Ceanty Coaaisslosurs of Collier County. Florida, this 20th . -_ 5 '" nay of December. 1988. a 4"; •s- . 1 , .. Clerk of Courts and Clerk •tptilS ,, Tx-officio to Board of .;-: . f •.<., C• ounty Coasissi nese .,� '••e N w Sys Maureen onyon j J• . Deputy Clerk . • '• 4. 0, lc,- _ X.71818 033 MI 150 1 • ,.. AGENDA ITEM 4-C Co pier County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION —ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 8, 2016 SUBJECT: PETITION NO: PDI-PL20150002852—SAPPHIRE LAKES PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Applicant/Owner: Agent: Michael Kerner c/o Development Consulting, LLC. Brian Howell 6230 Shirley Street, #202 Phoenix Associates of Florida, Inc. Naples, FL, 34109 13180 Livingston Rd.,Naples, FL,34109 REQUESTED ACTION: Development Consulting LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance Nos. 82-40 and 84-21, as amended, Green Heron, a Planned Unit Development, to amend the Master Plan to add an access point to the 5 acre commercial tract from Radio Road. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located north of Radio Road, approximately '/z mile west of the intersection of Radio Road and Davis Boulevard, in Section 33, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida(see page 2). PDI-PL20150002852 Page 1 of 10 December 8.2016 ■ : \ NII !MEW -- 1 ftsoli1.7101; imidhii...„ -e��•lilligifiritark., ,, ,2 ,...7":"‘' - �r_ 111414i1lt tot,�r► '� # �Q9141111�jo j, 0r p0,- s0,j Aiiw .4�Qa _ pm I rz)J x ��_ gtif, rr : •�qo rim,. ♦ /Ilincm 2 {� a • • ...I....- 4 iii I Illie fj:. ..._-7 ---_- , ____ ____ 31 I I.M44‘4 0 BY 1..- 2 8 4P t -4 C'1 t'sq 1: :I_ 1104,`,.1-7 „ 1., y1 MI u. on.;� il,�d�'_. Ire•..,.r_?'" .�'- orovi,... N .._, �IiIIa= �� wnunnuor IsHhsnli#urrar►\\ "i-_ ` * .ti.4rrttunr9i'► ro.:u- ., " .111 11I!IJIlllflllRlllllllrlj �G �ru t.!IJ rui►':�Mursr�1I (y {, .�a�lstrrr un,nr�rnuitl�lin;i�i■r r' �' ,``��o111N -o1{IIIiiI��ly �f�j:, .. II�� CO N ' �`� 4 1M !``ilift 746. OP' � I! '0.s ��."oho i�•HIII I lr? iso -''''47.47 ....-,5,1'..ot %%.0 41= -A I a t ii,%IA a 1 1 li 0 i,aI 1 J 0 0/119 Jatllo0 / E ZC >- - •° 1L C S d do as % -----\4, ..\\.‹... s, „...„..\\-17e6 ICO a co ca U Ct O J 0/119 eaeqpe9 ewes 0j uleg Awno0 PDI-PL20150002852 December 8.2016 Page 2 of 10 {' 1?1.:1.:N IiI :1:0 P U. D MAS'I'F:1? PLAN ._ --•.. 4., NATuir4i. ./..-------„,.....)...cm ' (41(9 kind 4/16. , • QU 1. AREA 0. ��%(!I ' �• . v tvil rxxs„„G a , ....._,;): 3 %2.„„, if:- , , t_.. .7„.., ,.........,-;r: . ! .0 si. ,...... r , I Irick•I ve I. 00„ '' /if i(il . .r, 10.* .••°. ....190%48 I, %.6i\ 1 . .0,.. .,,,.. A ti AC H ;- ,,, i,, q\ -\, 1..1 . •... V moi/ , Eig ..-.; - ) Itv 1../..i., , ..s, Immo u: i, :.c.....41 0 ... ,... 0 ita . r,.... I_______}, i." (........,- . ..\\ •-:'..' . .', . , )4.1 . 0 - s.ioiiiii 11 0 ..o, Ed :-.1 Kitt llnf. . . . \ \ 03� .fir+ :i \'' ' : a' ''''''----'\ - - la 4‘EEN t' 11 aittit11,0 MINPOSID UM •••• •Ifl GR ' J/Ar r(J •^� / .ire• t� 1`,� /.O iiC • • 1 Q. it;' r. ./�, �t•xIL.4 As+','/I III,j 0 ,r . 1 tl iis%, Y ii 1si 0 "rIit4#4 •�ti i• � ; ,: � iltl kt viiii Is of ' • i/ �\ S� \ �� .f it t�lktdlkL car�ackAL, ��,, aj 1 `e ::..• ;; . . • CO Ac r >:.�..r.-- • ----.rte �-- . Radio Road Access Radio Road Access Radio Road Access LOD VU LicPiti lAn ARA 0 !kItDR MU 137.4 907.4 AC. AC. qOW 6 AC. 0 RW'RUT1b11 AMA 7.OS AC. MAXIM 9RE11JMC 1114473 nee 11/073 () o k00 too goo NATURAL OPD StAGL 91.bt AC, ILUDROL CR033 MGM S t 1111/AC TOTAL PROJCCT AREA tt1 AC. NORTH optArinc SCALE Proposed Master Plan PDI-PL20150002852 Page 3 of 10 December 8, 2016 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF MAP CHANGES: The purpose of this petition is to request an additional access for the Green Heron PUD onto Radio Road. The applicant proposes an assisted living facility to service the 5+/-acre commercial site that abuts Radio Road. The proposed location for this access will align with the existing east bound left turn lane within the Radio Road right of way median(See aerial images below). n-_. R _ _ ,a, .. -��...�.-,saw.,... . .M.� ... , _ rte„ s Green Heron PUD Boundary 1 ' `',tl 'Cr -, y f 4b ' 8: l'e'i .. yt -!b , At,No., $ ,fro.ie 44060--,7,"•‘• �• - 0. 44,..... • .' � ' ,.. • .If - • . ltaftS "- ' .7' _ 411 "'I4 '2 4t...4,«,,44 to,‘ .. , ,,.. 1 - ,,. „y1 .6,f"* •Ip'4F '3' - " ty! ,,,, 4, Proposed access g t Ai N elf ...oft*. AAA • i '' ?ir 4,r* I ori � . j 4T e .. - • t,� _ ;4 ♦. %if'1 4 341 I ' Commercial Boundary lilif S'; lt% 'li ' ti .R l �" - East bound left turn lane lie, — . ' - 4 `''',"r"..-1F-414-4r mew s kg 1 .r PDI-PL20150002852 Page 4 of 10 December 8,2016 • In 1982, the Green Heron PUD was approved with a single access onto Radio Road. In 1984, the PUD was amended, increasing the acreage but still only having one access onto Radio Road. In 1985, the PUD was amended again, changing the uses within the PUD. In 2001, the PUD was again amended (PDI-AR-1356), to allow for an additional entrance onto Radio Road along with moving some of the residential and preserve boundaries(See below).. CHI.:1•:h i lFIV)It . P U I) MAS'I'IE:I1 I'LA1' ._----- (14:97" '''` N rum d ,,;, t�it Of/A t7 ---.,�3 I 4ftv • t •moi ""'f,�l s1 exam;„ua `' + 7.416, Ut ti .•'�+�, 'ice iii` ` � �$ $ J I Li vi.., i.k\,1 04) �/ig •I . ;!.. to K \ `. It 17, 0,•........ .. ..,-...:.,,.. —...\ . o ...-:-.. 1/..470,,,,.,,,,,, -... Eitc; -4_,...0 ,„,A ...„ ,. r, c , 0 0 . G--,,,,.,,,.,.,00 ,..7... ,,,„ k ed Ei KATURM. 0 ,� ( I '� ,pS�1�f++/!Y �'1 AREA {`SY\'U'1 V ti�J� flj .: pit • 813 :•irPrilT "' •/7z S Iii K i1' e.: Iii 'N u :. 11, 0 t 11 -4;.. °Om H. ." %.".`.. . " .. / Wit u ii - • RADIO ROAD IOS6) ...---.. - Els PROPOSED ENTRANCE ENTRANCE ANO USE iEGEND DEWW air LUCE REAL OL""EROPMO'T AREA 74 99 At COUNCRICAL AREA II AC (C., ru-1 NRppITSOORHOOD RECREATION ARG TAU AE- 34 C- IGUONDI DfIItA1C UNfTS lIM UNITS 0 NN[00 ]00 NATURAL OPO' SPACE OO..Ot - NA7O1!ftR CROSS Ddsttt S/ DU/Ac NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE TOTAL PROJECT AREA 8=I AC- tae. / aw4o+sDA LUCKY STRIKE L L.P. MCANl.Y ENGINEERING M stsc""" GREEN HERON ��„�..�D D GN. INC. P.U.D- MASTER PLAN ..n.r'.0040110 Caar0L.0.000 0 : 3 N4 T .0?. R s G COWES cOUVTY.TIONDA 1.«1...-•"' 110 - •._ TCYf nam.,,0,... CCN • a C . C . r tO•R. •1]uj+ 00000 200 n wr.•100,4000 r.,W . L 0005. 0005 RfC.tO OK f\l 04 `..��. PDI-PL20150002852 Page 5 of 10 December 8,2016 The Green Heron PUD is also a Development of Regional Impact (DRI). By resolution No.16-208, the Board of County Commissioners acknowledged that the DRI is essentially built-out. No further DRI review is needed. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPENT INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE CRITERIA: There are three types of changes to a PUD Ordinance: Substantial, Insubstantial, and Minor. An insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or minor change. An insubstantial change to an approved PUD Ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. The criteria and response to each criterion are listed below as follows: SECTION 10.02.13.E.1 a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development(PUD)? No,there is no proposed change to the boundary of the PUD. b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development? There is no increase to the total number of dwelling units, intensity of land uses, or height of buildings within the development. c. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development in excess of five(5)percent of the total acreage previously designated as such,or five(5)acres in area? No. d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open space),or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? No. e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities? With respect to the subject petition, no increase in traffic generation or negative impact on other public facilities is anticipated by this request. There will be changes in traffic circulation. The petition seeks to add an additional access onto Radio Road. PDI-PL20150002852 Page 6 of 10 December 8,2016 f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? The proposed amendment would not result in land use activities that generate higher levels of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention,or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? No. The proposed changes would not increase stormwater retention or stormwater discharge from that which was already contemplated. The applicant will be required to submit all appropriate information to SFWMD should this change necessitate modifications to the permitted stonnwater management system. h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? The proposed changes would not result in an incompatibility with adjacent land uses. i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? No. j. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to Sec. 380.06 (19), F.S. Any change that meets the criterion of Sec. 380.06 (19)9e)2., F.S., and any changes to a DRUPUD Master Plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under Sec. 2.7.3.5.4 or Sec. 2.7.3.5.6 of this Code. k. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under Section(s) 10.02.13 E.? No. Approval by the Hearing Examiner shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application and action should be taken at a regularly scheduled meeting. PDI-PL20150002852 Page 7 of 10 December 8,2016 SECTION 10.02.13.E.2 Does this petition change the analysis of the findings and criteria used for the original application,which are attached hereto as Exhibit A? Yes, the proposed amendment to the PUD Document does change the original analysis for the original application in the Staff Report(See Recommendation below). RECOMMENDATION: A.The developer shall provide left and right turn lane storage lanes on Radio Road at the proper entrance. B.The developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of a traffic signal when deemed warranted by the County Engineer.The signal will be owned,operated and maintained by Collier County. C.Adequate pavement markings as required by the County Engineer,and shall be provided on the entrance roadway and on that section of the roadway abutting the convenience commercial and at intersections. D.Access to the convenience commercial area shall be internal only.It shall have no direct access to Radio Road. Even though another access point is proposed, there will be no effect on traffic, including operations and capacity on Radio Road. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: Environmental Planning staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD Document to address environmental concerns. This project does not require Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) review since this project did not meet the EAC scope of land development project reviews as identified in Chapter 2,Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. TRANSPORTATION REVIEW: Transportation staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD Documents and approves this request. The proposed assess would not generate higher levels of vehicular traffic or affect operations. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM): On November 17, 2016, a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) was conducted and there were no objections noted by staff. PDI-PL20150002852 Page 8 of 10 December 8,2016 COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's Office reviewed this staff report on November 23,2016. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) approve Petition PDI- PL20150002852 Green Heron PUD for an additional access onto Radio Road according to the proposed plan submitted. Attachments 1: PUD Ordinance 82-40 2: Exhibit A—Original PUD findings 3: Application and Backup Material PDI-PL20150002852 Page 9 of 10 December 8,2016 PREPARED BY: al 1 r „/c1;?,/,0 Daniel James Smi , AICP,PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: -x 1 7- ): ' f:;-' . RAYM h V. ELLOWS,2 NING MANAGER BATE ZONIN DIVISION - '27, 7;° ' I(-72-1L MICHAEL BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION PDI-PL20150002852 Page 9 of 9 December 8,2016 ' . • ORDINANCE 82 - 40 • AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE 82-2, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE ZONING ATLAS MAP NUMBER 49-26-8 BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLAS- SIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM "A-2" to "PUD" PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE GREEN HERON: SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFEC- TIt'E GATE. Whereas, David L. Brennan petitioned the Board of - County Commissioners to change the Zoning Classification of the herein described real property; • NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida: Section One: The Zoning Classification of the herein. described real property located in Section 33, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from "A-2" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development in accordance with the PUD document attached hereto as Exhibit%"A" which is incorporated herein and by reference made a part hereof. The Official Zoning Atlas Map Number 49-26-8, as described in Ordinance 82-2, is hereby amended accordingly. Rection Two: - This Ordinance shall become effective upon receipt of • N Ell i ti M • fV i. �.: �.^ t `s rnca • N tr 1 • BOOK 015 PACE 86 rn °" ,� . • '! • r • -----..--...�.......�. Attachment 1 , • • • • • ' . 1;i:;Jai) • • , 7.1111." ' . "4Aii notice that it has been filed with the Secretary of State. DATE: May 25, 1982 BOARD Or COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA • • tee;) y��•RLi 4r •p f �r. NIS. A„ r'j. SAN, CLERK 8Y: �\=' '. '• ✓ e9//thknOto C. R. "RUSS" WINER, CHAIRMAN STAYI ,F FLORI1 ) COUNTY OF COLLIER ) I, WILLIAM J. REAGAN, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true original of: ORDINANCE NO. 82-40 . which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners . during Regular Session May 25, 1982. • . WITNESS my hand and the official sett of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 25th day of May, 1982. • WILLIAM J. REAGAN.ro 1,Ep Clerk of Courts and Clef p Ex-officio.to Bb'rd of • County Co�mmiss$bners '';'f . By: u er, v ' This ordinance filed with the Secretary of State's Office the 4th day of June, 1982 and acknowledgement of that filing.received this 9th day of'June. 19d2. 8Y_ fJbput 41 015 PO 87 .) • 4 ; • amdmor . ....-...-•r.. ..�..• .. . . •. 1 .' LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE GREEN HERON • (FILE NO. 181.31) A parcel of land lying in section 33, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, lying north of County Road 856 (Radio Road) and south of Interstate Highway I-7S; being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of Section 33, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Run • thence N 00.14'28"W, 50.00 feet along the east line of said Section 33, to a point on the north right-of-way line of County Road 856. Thence S 89.24'12"W, 493.52 feet along said north right-of-way to a point being the Point of Beginning. Run thence N 00.35'48" W, 1150.00 feet; thence 8 89.24'12"W, 1200.00 feet; thence N 00.35'48"W, 230.00 feet, _1 1e thence S 89.24'12"W, 200.00 feet, thence N 00.04'26" E, 1742.13 feet to a point on the south right-of-way' line of Interstate Highway I-75; thence S 87.55'16" W, 1186.15 feet . along said south right-of-way; thence S 00.06'26" E, 3104.22 feet to a point on the north right-of-way line of County Road 856; thence N 87'44'21" E, 440.02 feet along said north right-of-way; thence continuing along the north right-of-way line of County Road 856, N 89.24'12" E, 2152.04 feat to the Point of Beginning. Containing 122 Acres more or less. . 1: %I... • • t, F, 1: r............ .. ..._ .__. ,�. ._•,.. , . . . 0,I• THE GREEN HERON • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT DISTRICT ZONE: PUD PERMITTED USES: Multi-family dwellings; recreational open space; recreation structures and facilities; grounds maintenance facilities; temporary sewage treat- ment plant which may accomodate sewage from adjoining development; • neighborhood convenience commercial uses. PERMITTED ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES: Accessory uses and structures which are customary in multi-family residential communities and in recreational open space areas; admin- istrative, sales, and rental offices, which offices may be located in temporary or permanent structures, and may be located within a 1 residential or recreational structure. MAXIMUM CROSS PROJECT DENSITY: '4 j 5.37 units per acre. Total dwelling units count shall not exceed 656. ! •x; DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: z j MULTI-FAMILY SITES: Minimum building setback from street: 50 feet from back of curb for multi-family structures, 30 feet from back of curb for accessory 1 structures. Rear yards: 25 feet. Minimum side yards: One-half the building height, but not less than 10 feet. Maximum building height: 3 stories. Minimum dwelling unit floor area: Efficiency - $00 sq. ft.; I bedroom - 600 sq. ft.; 2 bedroom - 750 sq.ft.; 3 bedroom - 900 sq. ft. Minimum offstreet parking spaces: 2 spaces per dwelling unit, If of which shall be improved, one-half of which may be unimproved and landscaped. Planned, but unimprovedspaces shall be improved at a future date should actual parking demands dictate that necessity. i + • • • • D05 .;015 ?ACE 89• • , . ;: • } •4 • • . O. • 1 1 • K i t RECREATIONAL FACILITIES • Maximum club or recreation building height: 2 stories. Minimum separation between club qr principal recreation building • and street: SO ft." from back of curb. Minimum separation between club or principal recreation building and nearest multi-family lot: 23 ft. Minimum separation between tennis courts or other recreation equipment and street: 2S ft. from back of curb. . Minimum separation between tennis courts or other recreation equipment and nearest multi-family lot: 15 ft. • NEIGHBORHOOD CONVENIENCE COMMERCIAL USES: Uses permitted shall be limited to those of the C2 Zoning District. Minimum building setback from property line: SO ft. Minimum separation between adjoining buildings on site: • One-half the sum of the building heights, but not less than 15 ft. Maximum building height: 2 stories. Minimum offstreet parking spaces: As required by the Collier County f . ' . Zoning Ordinance. = y1 MULTI-FAMILY DWELLING UNiT DISTRIBUTION: A-, Multi-family dwelling unit distribution shall occur generally as indicated 1 on the approved Master Plan. Two or more adjoining multi-family sites may be joined to become a single development site. With the approval .�i; of the Director, minor changes In lot line location and in the distribu- ` ' • tion of multi-family dwelling units indicated on the approved Master Plan may be modified, so long as the total multi-family dwelling unit count does not exceed 658. • MASTER PLAN: The approved Green Heron Master Plan shall also constitute the approved Subdivision Master Plan. STREETS: Streets within theproject will be privately owned and maintained. All streets within the project shall bo classified as local. - 2 -. • • • toot 015 PACE 90 . t .. ...e,„ •. tt • ..�..,�...... ,..- �..._ T . 5 • f , l 1 . , t • • OPEN SPACE: Open space areas Indicated on the Master Plan may be utilized for natural area recreational purposes; may be improved with various recreation facilities; may be temporarily utilized for • sewage treatment and disposal; and may include lakes. No • portion of the open space indicated on the Master Plan may be utilized for residential building sites. EXCEPTIONS TO COUNTY SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS: Article X, Section 19: Street name signs shall be approved by the County Engineer but need not meet the U.S.D.O.T.F.H.W.A. Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices. Street pavement painting, striping, and reflective edging requirements shall be • waived except at entrance road and along commercial area. ' Article Xi, Section 17.F. i G.: Street right of way and cross- ' section shall be as follows: • l' r (See Page 3-A) _ ?t '� Article XI, Section 17.H.: The 1.000 ft. maximum dead-end street • length requirement shall be waived. i Artiste XI, Seetion 17.1.: 8aek of curb radii at street Intersections • shall be a minimum of 30 ft. it.:tt Article Xi, Section 17.K.: The requirement for 100 ft. tangent sections between reverse curves of streets shall be waived. Article XI, Section 21.: The requirement for bia4k utility casings . shall be waived, except that a blank utility casing shall be places • • .. along the northerly edge of Radio Road right-of-way under The Green Heron entrance drive. • . . - 3- 3 . BOOK on P� 91, ., C h r• • . • i., ".' .fit• • , j:• y • . - I • • , I . .• • 1 1 { THE GREEN • , 1 • ,.1 f .. . 4 • I 4 z `C' • n . • of ad i ...-LIN-41. /Ati/T SAY'S Iliij G. via 0-.1 sfR C. 11. brio At • i��» J T i�IWs ,� A A / • TYPICAL ROAD SECTION A. I2" 6-V031-MED 6Ut1GRAOE Lea. , 30 B. 6" LIME ROCK BASE. ( PRIMED ) C. I " ASPHALTIC. COKICRETE T`(PE (6-1) MOO. D. SLOPE To MEET E1(ISTINC; GRADE 1 E. GO1.1 .2ETE. 4A1.-14- 4" 1141 - 4 'V1/IDE 1 F. UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL SE PROVIDED ADJACENT THE 60' f RICHT-OF-NAY IF AND AS REQUIRED. ! . . = • - 31 - .. .«_ . a �� ... •• bo0K 010.rAGE 9r •r i 11 11 1I ,1 I • • TRAFFIC IMPROVEMENTS: 1. The developer shall provide left and right turn storage lanes on Radio Road at the project entrance. • 2. Thedaveloper shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of a traffic signal when deemed warranted by the County Engineer. • The signal will be owned, operated and main- tained by Collier County. . . . UTILITIES: • 1. All on-site and off-site utility facilities constructed by the Developer in connection with the development shall be constructed to County standards at no cost to the County. 2. All customers connecting to the sanitary sewer and water dis- tribution facilities will be customers of the County Water-Sewer District and will be billed in accordance with the approved County Rata Structure. 3. All construction plans and technical specifications for the proposed Utility Facilities must be reviewed and approved by the I '�{ . Utility Division prior to commencement of construction. 4. The proposed on-site wastewater treatment facility to be con- : as part of the proposed project must be regarded as interim and operated and maintained under a separate agreement with Water-Sewer District. S. Data pertaining to percolation rates for the proposed sewage disposal ponds shall be submitted with the construction plans `` to aid in evaluating the capacity of the sits to handle the proposed wastewater flow. 6. Data required under County Ordinance 80-112 must be submitted and approval granted prior to connection of units to the sani- tary sewer system. Submit copies of the approved DER permit applications and permits for the sewage collection system and wastewater treatment facility with the items required under . Ordinance 80-112. 7. Developer is prohibited from extending the Radio Road water main as part of this project. 8. A written agreement shall be entered into between the Developer and the County Water-Sewer District stating that: tt1 -. -• '--• .�.. . . . . . • . . .*..1 ..,.� . . . i' .a • Hi 015 rig •93 • . - .. .w......,.....:. .....:.. ,,.y... ., 1 •• • 1 a. Connection to the County's Central Sewer Facilities • will be made by the owners, their assigns or successors at no cost to the County or. the County Water-Sewer District within 90 days after such facilities become available. b. All construction plans and technical specifications relating to connections to the County's.Central Sewer • Facilities will be submitted for review and approval prior to commencement of construction. o. The owner or their assigns or successors shall agree to pay all system development charges and appropriate • 4.. connection fees at the time that building permits are requested, pursuant to the appropriate County Ordinances, • District Resolution or Regulations in effect at the time • of building permit request. • !' i . } • • • f . • a 5 • N 1 '[ . • .. . , • t•M I • a►* 411 • o . i 0 � • . pat 0 , t ,, r "s 1,1 2 r" a p l 0 m a I . 0 Boz . .... • O i. h k-t�. I ,0 itfo• .f z fill at i I kw41 VA& 41.„ co . / i . hia —.h. 1 1 . I i II wi i " ala . . • . • • Iii ftl D it t IDD A 1 1 . 1 1 � . ......... ,...••..s...:w..... ..ars...rrwe+rtw...,••+w..•.•...4.«•rtw.w....a„,+r ..... •�!'t!•.,,..,. 100K 015 M 95' oar __....�......._....., .. MEMORANDUM DATE: April 7, 1982 TO: Coastal Area Planning Commission FROM: Community Development Division SUBJECT: Petition R-82-5-C, David L. Brennan Requesting Rezoning from "A-2" to "PUD" for 658 Multifamily Units. 1. Location and Proposed Use: The subject property is 123 acres located on the north side of Radio Road, 1% miles east of High Pines Trailer Park. The petitioner is proposing to develop a planned unit development with 658 multifamily rental units. 2. Surrounding Zoning: • Lands to the north, east and west are zoned "A-2". Land to the south is zoned "A-2" with a petition pending for rezoning to PUD. 3. Surrounding Land Use: All surrounding lands are undeveloped "A-2" zoned lands. I-75 right-of-way abuts the property to the north. 4. Comprehensive Plan Land Use: Lands to the north, west and east are designated Medium Density Residential. Lands to the south are designated Low to Medium Density Residential Land Use and Medium Density Residential Land Use. 5. Environmental and Drainage Considerations: This petition has been reviewed by the EAC and WMAB and received no objections subject to the stipulation that detailed construction plans be submitted to the County Engineer for review prior to the start of any construction. 6. Traffic: The Traffic Planner has reviewed the subject petition and has the following comments and recommendations: 7 At full occupancy, the proposed 658 dwelling units could generate up to 4,000 trip ends per day. Virtually all of these trips will be oriented to and from the Attachment 2 — i west on Radio Road. Peak hour traffic exiting the site could be in the range of 200 vehicles per hour and could warrant signalization. 4 The PUD document proposes that pavement markings be waived. This is acceptable except at the entrance-way and on that section of roadway abutting the convenience commercial area. Adequate pavement markings should be provided in those areas and at intersections. The petitioner indicates the possibility that some of the units may be sold if the rental market is not • strong enough to support the project. The PUD document should contain adequate provisions assigning future roadway maintenance responsibilities should this occur. RECOMMENDATION: A. The developer shall provide left and right turn storage lanes on Radio Road at the proper entrance. B. The developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of a traffic signal when deemed warranted by the County.Engineer. The signal will be owned, operated and maintained by Collier County. C. Adequate pavement markings as required by the County Engineer, shall be provided on the entrance roadway and on that section of the roadway abutting the convenience commercial area and at intersections. ---, � D. Access to the convenience commercial area shall be internal only. It shall have no direct access to - Radio Road. 7. Utilities: The Utilities Manager has reviewed the subject petition and has no objection subject to the following stipulations: A. We take exception to the request for waiver of utility conduits under Article XI, Section 21 of the Subdivision Regulations as listed on Page 3 of the PUD document. Unless services for water are extended to the property line for each lot, appropriate conduits must be provided. B. All on-site and off-site utility facilities constructed by the Developer in connection with the development shall be constructed to County standards at no cost to the County and shall be deeded to the County Water-Sewer District, in accordance with applicable County Ordinances and Regulations. • C. As proposed, the rights-of-way within the project will be privately owned. Appropriate Utility Easements dedicated to the County Water-,Sewer District must be provided for the water and sewer facilities to be constructed. D. All customers connecting to the sanitary sewer and water distribution facilities will be customers of the County Water-Sewer .District and will be billed in accordance with the approved County Rate Structure. E. All construction plans and technical specifications for the proposed Utility Facilities must be reviewed and approved by the Utility Division prior to commencement of construction. F. The proposed on-site wastewater treatment facility to be constructed as part of the proposed project must be regarded as interim; be deeded to the County Water-Sewer District and be operated by the County Utility Division or leased back to the 3 Developer for operation and maintenance under a -- separate agreement with the County Water-Sewer District. The dedication of the treatment facility shall include the land utilized. Upon deactivation and removal of the treatment facility, the Water/ Sewer District may offer to sell the land at the then current "fair-market" price. G. Data pertaining to percolation rates for the proposed sewage disposal ponds shall be submitted with the construction plans to aid in evaluating the capacity of the site to handle the proposed wastewater flow. H. Data required under County Ordinance 80-112 must be submitted and approval granted prior to connection of units to the sanitary sewer system. Submit copies of the approved Department of Environmental Regulation permit applications and permits for the sewage collection system and wastewater treatment facility with the items required under Ordinance 80-112. I . As stated in the PUD document, this development plans to obtain potable water from the Collier County Regional Water System. The anticipated connection date to the County's Water System is April, 1983. The County Water-Sewer District will not be in a position to provide potable water in tics area until at least the latter portion of 1983. The District is currently finalizing a contract to extend the existing 8-inch main on Radio Road with a new 12-inch main connected to the County Water Treatment Plant on S.R. 951. This construction will prohibit the Developer from extending the Radio Road main as part of this project. J. We require a written agreement with the Developer on the project stating that: 1) Connection to the County's Central Sewer Facilities will be made by the Owners, their assigns or successors at no cost to the County or the County Water-Sewer District within 90 days after such facilities become available. 2) All construction plans and technical specifications relating to connections to the County' s Central Sewer Facilities will be submitted for review and approval prior to commencement of construction. 3) The Owner or their assigns or successors shall agree to pay all system development charges and appropriate connection fees at the time that Building Permits are requested, pursuant to the appropriate County. Ordinances and Regulations in effect at the time of Permit request. 8. Subdivision Review Committee: The Subdivision Committee reviewed this petition on March 3, 1982 and recommended approval subject to stipulations of the Utilities Manager and recommended approval of all waivers requested with the following changes: A. Striping not to be waived at entrance and along commercial area. B. All street pavements to be 24' in width. C. Blank utility casings shall be waived except at entrance. 9. Review of PUD Document: Staff has reviewed the PUD document and recommends the following changes or additions: Page 2 Add the following to Neicborhood Convenience Commercial Uses: ; Uses allowed within this District shall be limited to those convenience commercial uses indicated in the Zoning Ordinance at time of building permit application. Pg. 3 Exceptions Add "except at entrance road and along commercial area" to the striping section. Change pavement width on 50 ft. easement to 12 ' travel lanes. Show sidewalk on cross-section. Show note concerning utility easements on 50' cross-section. Add "except at entrance road" to utility casings section. Add a new Pg. 4 with the following information: Traffic Improvements: 1. The developer shall provide left and right turn • storage lanes on Radio Road at the project entrance. 2. The developer shall provide a fair share contribution toward the capital cost of a traffic signal when deemed warranted by the County Engineer. The signal will be owned, operated and maintained by Collier County. 3. Access to the convenience commercial area shall be ------ 7 internal only. It shall have no direct access to Radio Road. Utilities: Utilities shall be provided in accordance with the Utilities Manager's Memo dated 2/18/82,, which is a part of this document. Landscaped Buffer: A landscaped buffer shall be provided between the Radio Road right-of-way and the parallel Green Heron access road. 10. Staff Recommendation: Coastal Area Planning Commission forward Petition R-82-5-C to the Board for approval, subject to amendments to the PUD document. DATE: 4' 7- PREPARED PREPARED BY: •v APPROVED BY: MLK/sgg/42-Y 4/7/82 Utility Provisions t! R_82- 5C for Rezones & Provisional Uses . 1. NAME: David L. Brennan 2. ADDRESSE-Suite 1100 First National Tower, Akron, Ohio 44308 3. PHONE: 216-762-2411 4. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Attached 5. TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED: A. COUNTY SYSTEM • B. CITY SYSTEM C. ON-SITE TREATMENT PLANT XX: CAPACITY 217,000 gpd . 6. TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED: A. COUNTY SYSTEM XX B. CITY SYSTEM C. FRANCHISE SYSTEM • • D. PRIVATE SYSTEM • 7. TOTAL POPULATION TO BE. SERVED 1.645 • 8. PEAK AND AVERAGE DAILY DEMANDS: 1. WATER - PEAK 482,000 gpd AVERAGE DAILY 241,000 gpd 2. SEWER - PEAK 542,500 gpd AVERAGE DAILY 217,000 gpd 9. IF PROPOSING TO CONNECT TO REGIONAL WATER SYSTEM ALONG SR-951, • DATE SERVICE WILL BE,. REQUIRED Apr+if_ 1983 • 10. BRIEF, CONCISE NARRATIVE AND SCHEMATIC DRAWING OF THE SEWAGE TREATMENT PROCESS TO BE USED•AS WELL AS A SPECIFIC STATEMENT REGARDING THE METHOD OF EFFLUENT AND SLUDGE DISPOSAL. IF PERCO- SNBEPONDS PROVIDEDTFROM TESTS PREPAREDPERCOLATION PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER.,INVOLVED SHALL 11. A STATEMENT, IN WRITING, SIGNED BY THE OWNER SHOULD BE PROVIDED AGREEING TO DEED TO THE COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT THE WATER DISTRIBUTION AZOD SEWAGE COLLECTION FACILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA UPON COMPLETION OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THESE FACILITIES IN ACCORDANCE WITH APPLICABLE COUNTY ORDINANCES . THIS STATEMENT SHOULD ALSO INCLUDE AGREEMENT THAT APPLICABLE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT ' CHARGES AND CONNECTION FEES WILL BE PAID TO THE COUNTY WATER - . SEWER DISTRICT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS BY THE . L....7z: COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT. THE STATEMENT SHOULD ALSO CONTAIN • AGREEMENT TO DEDICATE APPROPRIATE UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR SERVING THE WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS . • FOR OFFICE USE ONLY , • APPROVED DENIED COMMENTS: N • • • UTILITY DIRECTOR • MLL:1P • COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 3/16/81 • y • • • • I • • • . THE GREEN HERON Background Information for Utility Provisions for Rezone and Provisional Uses 1. Propose Water System As stated in the environmental impact letter used as support information for the subject rezoning petition potable Water will be obtained from the Collier County Utility system. A central water supply system will be constructed throughout the project. The proposed water line will be constructed within the roadway rights of way. Upon completion of construction of the central distribution system the lines will be tested to insure that they meet Collier County' s minimum requirements after which, they will be dedicated to the County. 2. Wastewater Collection System A central wastewater collection system will be constructed at the site. The proposed collection main, and force mains will be constructed within the roadway rights of way. The proposed facilities will be designed and constructed in accordance with the minimum standards as specified by the Collier County Utility Division. Prior to dedication to the County all facilities will be tested to insure compliance with the minimum standards and specifications. 3. Wastewater Treatment and Disposal Sewage treatment will be provided by an on-site sewage treatment plant until a regional wastewater collection system and treatment plant is developed to serve the area, at which time a connection will be made to the regional system and the on site plant removed. The proposed treatment plant will be a field erected steel plant which will utilize the contact stabilization treatment process to provide secondary treatment. Further treatment will be provided by a polishing pond with the effluent being disposed of in a percolation/evaporation pond. Excess sludge will be removed by a licensed hauler. The proposed facilities will be designed and constructed in compliance with standards and regulations of the Florida Dept. of Environmental Regulation. • • • AS DEVELOPER OF THE GREEN HERON I, DAVID BRENNAN, AGREE TO: 1) DEED TO THE COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT THE WATER DISTRIBUTION AND SEWAGE COLLECTION FACILITIES • WITHIN THE PROJECT AREA UPON COMPLETION OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF THESE FACILITIES IN ACCORD WITH APPLICABLE COUNTY ORDINANCES. 2) PAY APPLICABLE SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT CHARGES AND CONNECTION FEES TO THE COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS BY THE COUNTY BUILDING DEPARTMENT. 3) DEDICATE APPROPRIATE UTILITY EASEMENTS FOR SERVING THE WATER AND SEWER SYSTEMS. DAVID BR- 'N DATE . $ jCountY COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.collierxov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PUD(PDI) LDC subsection 10.02.13 E&Code of Laws section 2-83—2-90 Ch.3 G.3 of the Administrative Code Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.2, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 and shall require the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application. PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Michael Kerner c/o Development Consulting, LLC. Address: 6230 Shirley Street #202 City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34109 Telephone: 239-254-7860 Cell: 239-378-0960 Fax: 239-254-7862 E-Mail Address: DevelopmentconsultingLLC@gmail.com Name of Agent: Brian Howell Folio#:00296440704Section: 33 Twp: 49S Range: 26E Firm: Phoenix Associates of Florida, Inc. Address: 13180 Livingston Rd #204 City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34109 Telephone: 239-596-9111 Cell: 239451-0041 Fax: 239-596-2637 E-Mail Address: BHowell@Phoenix-Associates.com 6/17/2015 Page 1 of 5 Attachment 3 S&9tY COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Is the applicant the owner of the subject property? [— Yes Q No I I 1.If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name the beneficiaries below. 2. If applicant is corporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers and major stockholders below. Q 3. If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity,so indicate and name principals below. 0 4. If applicant is an owner,indicate exactly as recorded, and list all other owners, if any. C 5. If applicant is a lessee,attach copy of lease,and indicate actual owners if not indicated on the lease. 0 6. If applicant is a contract purchaser, attach copy of contract,and indicate actual owner(s) name and address below: (if space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Mr. Michael Kerner - 1001%_ownership • DETAIL OF REQUEST On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. PROPERTY INFORMATION PUD NAME: Green Heron ORDINANCE NUMBER: 95-30 FOLIO NUMBER(S): Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). If applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a legal description for subject portion. Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change. Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? (J Yes No • 6/17/2015 Page 2 of 5 Co ev County • COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 If no, please explain: Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? Yes Q No If yes, in whose name? Has any portion of the PUD been(J SOLD and/or C DEVELOPED? Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? ❑Yes Q■ No If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet. 6/17/2015 Page 3 of 5 * Co er County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Insubstantial Change Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below,with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. tt OF NOT REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED Completed Application(download current form from County website) 16 ❑ E. _Pre-Application Meeting notes 1 Li El Project Narrative,including a detailed description of proposed changes 16 ❑ ❑ and why amendment is necessary --11 Detail of request E -.t El Current Master Plan& 1 Reduced Copy — 0 Revised Master Plan&1 Reduced Copy ❑ ❑ El Revised Text and any exhibits fx i El PUD document with changes crossed through&underlined - ❑ ❑ ❑ III PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance it ❑ n Warranty Deed _ - Q ❑ Legal Description ❑ 0 El Boundary survey,if boundary of original PUD is amended ❑ if PUD is platted, include plat book pages ❑ L❑ U List identifying Owner&all parties of corporation 2 ❑ R Affidavit of Authorization,signed&notarized 2 El Completed Addressing Checklist 1 H El Copy of 8 Y:in.x 11 in.graphic location map of site 1 Q ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise:The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials ❑ L Li to be submitted electronically in PDF format. *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing,include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 0 6/17/2015 Page 4 of 5 • Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 PLANNERS—INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: r School District(Residential Components):Amy ri Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Lockheart Executive Director Utilities Engineering:Kris VanLengen Parks and Recreation:Vicky Ahmad Emergency Management:Dan Summers _ Naples Airport Authority:Ted Solida Conservancy of SWFL:Nichole Ryan = Other: City of Naples:Robin Singer,Planning Director Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS PUD Amendment Insubstantial(PDI):$1,500.00 Pre-Application Meeting:$500.00 Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner:$925.00 The completed application, all required submittal materials,and fees shall be submitted to: • Growth Management Department/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples FL 34104 - -2 3 14 16 0 Applicant/Owner Signature Date Michael Kerner Applicant/Owner Name(please print) • 6/17/2015 Page 5 of 5 PHOENIX ASSOCIATES OF FLORIDA,INC. CGC#034149 W WW.P HOENIX-ASSOCI ATES.COM Design Build General Contractor SAPPHIRE ALF-DETAIL OF REQUEST-PER LDC 10.02.13 E.1. August 10,2016 L Changes and amendments I her. :te three t pes cel elatangcs to a PUD Urdinanee: Substantial. Instrhstantt al and 1minor. I. Substantial changes Ali substantial chailt!e!i, to an appro ed Pt ID ti.hdinarice shall require the review and recommendatu n of the Planning Commission and appro'ti al h the Board of County Commissioners as a PUL) amendment prior to implementation. Applicants shall be required to submit and pini ess ant V. application crimplete ! ith pertinent surpottintl data. .is set forth to the Administrative Cod," For the purpose ofthis section. a substantial change shall he deemed to crust kiherc. a. A proposed change in the houndari. of the Pt ID. NOT APPLICABLE b A proposed increase iii tt i i ;l I "'I s't nr dt of land use or height of buildings within the duvul,, NOT APPLICABLE c. A proposed deeiease in pre'er ,,.art.,l anon, rcereJtiou o, .iter'. :*pkiee areas tt'ithmn the 4lc ali'latii ! :`e Iota! .enlace pre, totisho designated as such. or l acres in ate,i. NOT APPLICABLE d. .'1 proposed increase in the silo of are-as used tor i! r iresidentlal useti.. t<.' irrelutre in irtutrurn il. eotnttierclerl and industrial laid uses teycludillu inns ' anon. ca nscr nitro or ('Maedi J17Iacsl i>r i9 proposed relocation cat nonresidential land a NOT APPLICABLE e A substantial increase in the impacts of tltt '•` iV include but arc nit! limited toincreases r'1 traffic generation: changes In trattie circulation. or Impacts on other public facrlittus,NOT APPLICABLE r A chamle that will resnn ti' land use acral ittu' Mat :venerate a higher {;'ACI e+t vth'cul-tr traffle. based 111' ` trip Generation llama; published h inti Institute 0( I ransf1Ortatloil En+_meets. NOT APPLICABLE +a:'!1! i_' r,{r .. _. e ',:I:'}t. Iii Ii7; 'tail; OtliCt' ke NOT APPLICABLE that tact alt:1. I,.' NOT APPLICABLE CORPORATE OFFICES • 13180 LIVINGSTON ROAD SUITE 204 NAPLES,FLORIDA 34109 P 239.596.9111 F 239.596.2637 PHOENIX ASSOCIATES OF FLORIDA,INC. • CGC#034149 WWW.PHOENIX-ASSOCI;ATES.0 M Design Build General Contractor Anv modification to the I'U ) master plan or I'll) doeuine'nt lir amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inco'.t-..tett 1> ith the Future Land Use [lenient or othei element of the 'Growth Management I' i !;t's. i[i ill would increase the densitR or intensh of the permitted land LI S.NOT APPLICABLE The proposed change is tk. ;t I'UI) district designated ,t a development of regional impact (DRI► and apprt+v'ed pursuant t.+ F.S 4 :;N0,06, where such chane requires a determination and public hearing Iii I other County purtivant to I S 3`0.0(i( I"). ,\n) chance that meets the erirerlun of r.S 3NO.l)6( I`ftcl2. and anv changes to a DR I'l'1 iD master plan that elearly do not reale a suliiantial de\ration shall he reviewed and appiove ed Counts under this [DC section I ll 07.i 3-,NOT APPLICABLE k .\11A modification in the KID mash-A plan lir PIA) nA,,cu iicnit o1' amendment lu a l'r)l) i oril!tl;]iree i1'Itrili ilt)I)ael( ) anv consideration i. ��tal1[1,tl itls?diticatiu11 aS descrihed uiu ei this LDC section I .; I12.13 NOT APPLICABLE • SCORPORATE OFFICES 13180 LIVINGSTON ROAD SUITE 204 NAPLES,FLORIDA 34109 P 23”96.9111 F 239.596.2637 Coker County COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (239)252-2400 Pre-Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: PUP,..1 Date and Time; 1/13/2016 Assigned Planner: Daniel James Smith Engineering Manager(for PPL's and FP's): Project information Project Name: Sapphire Lakes Access PL#: PL20150002852 Property ID#: 00296440704 Current Zoning: GREEN HERON PUD Project Address: City: State: Zip: Applicant: Radio Road Development, LLC Agent Name: Chris Lascano, PHOENIX ASSOC. phone: 239-569-9111 x203 • 13180 Livingston Road,Suite#204 City: Agent/Firm Address: State: Zip: Property Owner: Please provide the following,if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed#of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments,indicate the original petition number: v. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: 1 Co er County • COLUER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.cofliergov.net (239)252-2400 IMeeting Notes I r ,r 1 , , ,r r' ** tJ!1/ 13 e A Pcc u on eo (..)tvr r ,1,-. 1..e---1(4-1 r-te,....1Jr-Sur LTA-144 k'.er er _ReJJOL S . d+- Vizaiiws JZ ' Ti, t G AL- ( if t,..., 1.. i tai -, l )1_,-. .a� A_14_-Z'+-,_ ►!-r........_ iL) LI f L, vim ; • , r _,t , J 1_r'a_. ,. .r i. "`7 ) !' T Y ( LL .i.. L. ` A 1i ? i_ ... 1. ._....."1„. F ri Li I N Fier V 14 'r' ,J£7 ._-.-,,104--i/..-. ,.. ) r^ 0 L,L Noll C-4--- RE40 r r 'i' . • I ...-4er County III COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colllergov.net (239)252-2400 Pre-Application Meeting Sign-in Sheet PL#:20150001611 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline i Phone Email Richard Anderson Environmental Specialist 252-2483 richardanderson@colliergov.net _ David Anthony _y Environmental Review ` 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque@colliergovnet Steve Baluch,P.E. Transportation Planning 252-2361 St •henBaluch@colliergov.net Laurie Beard Transportation Pathways {_252-5782 Lauriebeard@colliergov.net XRachel Beasley Planner 252-8202 rachelbeasley@colliergov net __ Marcus Berman i County Surveyor 252-6885 MarcusBerman@colliergov.net Madelin Bunter Architectural Review 2524523 madelinbunster@colliergov.net Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 4 252-5165 markburtchin@colhergov,net George Cascio ¢ Utility Billing I252-5543 georgecascio@coliiergov.net Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst.County Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton@cotliergov.net K Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning , 252-5715 suefaulkner@colliergov net 4111 ° Eric Fey,P.E. Site Plans Reviewer 252-2434 ericfey@coliiergov.net Paula Fleishmany Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 pauiafleishman@cotliergov.net Nancy Gundlach,AICP,PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancyyundlach@colliergov net Sher Hingson East Naples Fire District , 687-5650 , shingson@ccfco.org John Houldsworth Engineering Services 2S2-5757 lohnhouldsworth@coltiergov net Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways ) 252-5744 4 lodihughes@coihergov.net Alicia Humphries ._,_ Site Plans Reviewer/ROW 252-2326 1 aliciahumphries@collierg_ov.net Eric Johnson,AICP,CFM 44_ Zoning Services _ 252-2931 ericjohnson@colliergov.net Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall@colliergov.net Stephen Lenberger - Environmental Review 4, 252-2915 stevelenberger@coilier3ov.net Paulo Martins Utilities 252-4285 _ pauiomartins@colliergov.net Thomas Mastroberto i Fire Safety 252-7348 Thomasmastroberto@colliergov net _ Jack McKenna,P.E. En_gineering Services i 252-2911 -jackmckenna@cotliergay.net Matt McLean,P.E. Principal Project Manager + 252-8279 matthewmclean@colliergov net i Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility Impact Fees 1252-4215 gilbertmoncivaiz@colliergov.net�.. Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 ' annismoxam@collier.ov.net Stefanie Nawrocki Planning and Zoning 1 252-2313 StefanieNawrocki@collier ov.net 1 Mariam Ocheltree Graphics 1 252-2315 mariamocheltree@colller1ov.net i Brandy Otero Transit y 252-5859 1 brandyotero@coliier_gov.net CO Comity • COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (239)252-2400 i Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipoliard@colliergov.net ;7c, Fred Reischl,AICP Zoning Services IMII fredreischl@colliergov.net Stacy Revay Transportation Pathways 252-5677 sta revay@ collier:ov.net f Brett Rosenblum,P E Utility Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenblum@colliergov net Michael Sawyer Zoning Services 252-2926 4 michaelsawyer@coiliergov net Corb Schmidt,AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 i corbyschmidt@collier$ov.net Chris Scott,AICP Planning and Zonin: 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net Daniel Smith,AICP Landscape Review 252-4312 danielsmith@colliergov.net Ellen Summers Planning and Zoning 252-1032 Ellen5ummers@collier:ov.net Scott Stone Assistant County Attorne 252-8400 scottstone@collier:ov.net t Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net t Kris Vanlen:en Utility Planning 252-5366 krisvaniengen@colliergov net , Jon Walsh Building Review 252-2962 'onathanwalsh@colliergov.net i David Weeks,AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@collier:ov.net Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov net Christine Willoughby Planning and Zoning 252-5748 ; ChristineWilloughby@colliergov net • Additional Attendee Contact Information: ' Name Representing Phone Email �J T _ i. • DC 2.3--- -4.11 11 i�01Nei1 C F veNlx-.LL _ s c i 1— :' f[ l 1 III ' .4&.a...........01intal • COWER COIN Y GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliersav net (239)252-2400 MX (239)252.5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD AddressingGcolliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239.252.5724 or submit In person to the Addroning Section at the above address.Form must be stoned by Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED.Forms older than 8 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE(indicate type below,complete a ssparats Addressing Mecktiet kr each Petition type) (BlastingEL ) p SDP(Site Development Plan) BD(Bost pock Extension) SOPA(SDP Amendment) Cancan Permit SDPI improvement�)to SOP) CU(Conditional Use)EXP(Excavation Permit) MPI(Insubstantial Change to SIP) FP(Final Plat SNR(Street Name Change) LLA(Lot Line Adjustment) SNC(Street Name Change—Unpiatted) PNC(Project Name Change) TDR(Transfer of Development Rights) PPL(Plans&Piet Review) VA(Variance) PSP(Preliminary Subdivision Plat) VRP(Vegetation Removal Permit) gPUD , (VegetationRemoval 3 Site Fill Permit) Standard RezoneOTHER ID LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties(copy oflengthy desmon may be alord►ed) 33 49 26 that parcel as desc In OR 2374 PG 253(Tract R&I Sapphire Lakes) Parcel 10 FOLIO(Property ID)NUMBER(s)of above(attach to,orassodate a legal decor lon',more then one) •0296440704 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES(as applicable,If already assigned) 5001-Radk-Road • LOCATION MAP must be attached snowing exact location of projecb'stte in relation to nearest public road tight- of-way • SURVEY(copy-needed only for unplatied properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME(Xappltcable) Sapphire Lakes PROPOSED PROJECT NAME 0 8pp/table) WA PROPOSED STREET NAMES(If applicable) N/A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER(for existing prsa only) •SDP - orAR or PL 9 I ' _ _ _ _ _ _ COWER COUNTYGOVERNMENT MOO Ham HORDZSHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENTDEPARTMENT NAPLES, 94104 www.aaotermwnet (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 Piled or d°voloPro°M names proposed far.or d"°odY aPP°°M"0 (il appicatlar; indicate whether proposed°residing) Green Heron DRI - Sapphire Lakes Please Return Approved ChecklistBy: I 1 Emil ❑ Fax ❑ Peaonelly picked up Applicant Nemo: Chris Lascano - Phoenix Associates of South Florida. Inc. Phone: (239)596-9111 X203 EnadYFax:CLascano@Phoenbc-Associates.00rn Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name • approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. FOR STAFF USE ONLY paw Number 00296440704 Polio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: /n Data 10/06/15 Updated by: Dabs IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE • UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED I II voles i gra X1 I /// I O. V) / I I40000e. 4) I r -#00 ' I I erwr.Pion a 00 I 0 I S • lk I 40" tg I , I . 011ie OR 01111114I 4.4.0,1.- I . taiiiimi • IS II . . . s1rAsiMM trtYSAnU u4 Vali I I IS Al I ., ii '1 . ..... PHOENIX ASSOCIATES OF FLORIDA,INC. • CGC H034149 W W W.PHOENIX-ASSOCIATES.COM Design Build General Contractor SAPPHIRE ALF-PDI—PROJECT NARRATIVE August 10,2016 The proposed PDI being submitted is to request an additional right in! right out driveway access to Radio Road into the Green Heron PUD project. The proposed driveway will only be to service the 5+/-acre commercial site that abuts Radio Road.The proposed location for this access will align with the existing East bound decal and turn lane within the Radio Road right of way median. The proposed access to the commercial site ALF project will not have interconnectivity to the existing residential entrances into Sapphire Lakes. • • CORPORATE OFFICES 13180 LIVINGSTON ROAD SUITE 204 NAPLES,FLORIDA 34109 P 239.596.9111 F 239.596.2637 • ' GREEN HERON P. U.D. MASTER PLAN • EnEMI ; pir- •no As I, 1 I'1 1,r >, : -, . . . .1 aca•• . \\At if r: ifi II i.e '..."- ,-- '•:•:•".• 0 47 " • /i I ,1-7.:. '`,', •.: '"N-s,wets, 1"; •• 0 --tatwaram E3 :- (11 1111 1.7)... Ak,. '•,, ,•cz:.... '-' ) ow-- 1E II iiip ... . . "---4tt El § • • • • • • • • , - o ,gym met . -- : ‘.,\Iii � �� . .l : Mmfan .; ,, ; ..ii:".-. (, 1:----., / lefffOlEla r: • , L.-, & , : i.ki- ,, ,-.,,,,,Au 1 .i+f/ l ,�1t�lt �, t KC Mill , UM UZI Maws GRAINProt.ic e saserflal*R reirei aae� LN aL. aaaaw MUMS WITS Mil Mm •• .r. - y� COMM&ASA b,14 aaAavM CaoLs Minn ••N/•e — lir WansaaeM LaaaL•TLa•am a ac I ••s•I 5m MUM a.e.act a.ac EXHIBIT 'A" APR 18 ITS YTaL Plll 7 Mk !al ag A w air..w.�rr�r�r.r••az......::::v...••.�. �n..www..r �.rr...r .^ �..r...�..•w GRA DEVELOPMENT. INC. MCANIY ASHER 1 .. . 1 AMD ASW6IAIEX PJB • •v•.••SOU SIMS WM °JOr"k GREEN HERONMASTER PLAN ,, ~.U.D. „ l isf,Laea*"� 1`gam : 0 P * a M VMS T"tom no/•a noon :1-3.11"-=1/aft. E.4.ru «• •elsa4••Q N awn%sae ma aOLP{1f Rn ata airs sLaara ams.la{.Nalarmai L ftp •a•• J • .__., T I:i •, .. , p i.3. k.,. D. .P1 i.`. . 1 Jt� , j ,:4,,a --/' // • \\n/Ia` \\__ • e(/ } �� } , !II i'33� 5 „\_r • • • • c' � c7ir 'r% r C' - • • • tl_”" :E_�^ ' --1j • • • •.>�. • ..�v,]may , .I �I• • �("�Qy ;K . . I�'{�/��(q�} '` •• �V/" ..... -.,-_,..7.3G/s /...7'•— it tv.t 1. -• ti N.,.49A I �{/' • • j I,jrS r1 '`inn 3� � \ EaISifMG LAK¢ �a,_T•"" p�yc/i 5, .y ,- ' .i • . . A' Vkl • ., k•'....,- ' "' 5' .tfI RFC ,. r''''\d✓ . .�,.I r:;(.'l s -1.. 'n'R 4C TlI'.\sc, ( ,I •`_ - ....1. . il tfll I'h/�i,I !. •r� / ~`-� I!' _j^._ II - (.�ur+}+7Tit�J��f�i1 I •'II ��._ —Kz / V e!--' �:71-..; ^ Jr REC. W1 J1 "". .,m-,-r.,s`at PROPOS/ 'i5 TRACT . �,,a1 t (( I LAKE �~ ,•470 , I 1.J..a. L tat: �� AO a<' 1 E1�8TIKC LM1NE I /, 47ti - I' /- //1 �•,• !�\ ' 'i/f ; '`' Pic I -t-,5-l'• J EKLRnm TAKE! ,Ja-%/ I ;I '�' �/ .) Ej1=JI � ./� "tear `\._.. �7�^ i i :. ezd., ... li !II, • -.-.- . . . s�..../ /.,j7/. ,, #:_ / //41 L�7—....J EXISTING LAKE „c3------------4: I:3 - -4 JII 1'',V. ” " . • . '__I..."1 \!:":3 .',.....,47/, )1..V.A.,,6]1 1,i`b.J7,1: % El / jJ— \Ta. I -rSj(^1i''I I : 1. :,:s4t% \ 4%); i ,I ......\, .:----1::•;5•1•-;*H \ \ ?• (77 i�,\l C�'/;''6::7' ; EXISTS, % j.O � PoSED 464 \/</�.. '�\ I! c.l 1\4••V' i LIKE 1 �^.(7,,,</.1‘\::12A60KF.Ac 1, :� _ I %// _ .yyy \ ;I !-t it tet`fri as 1 '`(/ F'LTCRE COMMERCIAL TRACTIROPOj-p‹=/ I ,\ �¢�+�.r.�'Yj.�l ��^J,,,,,et"/ , I ' - ' 5.0 AC. RICHTINa,II LAND USELEGEND t._ r j—- ''T'. , _1. _ RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AREA 137'.4 AC. 1 j\'` i LAKE AREA 36.93 AC. COMMERICAL AREA 5 AC. ,1 NEIGHBOOR1400D RECREATION AREA 7.05 AC. j" I �__, NATURAL OPEN SPACE 34.62 AC. MAXIMIM DWELLING UNITS 1168 UNITS �.J i•� 0 t00 200 300 TOTAL PROJECT AREA 221 AC. MAXIMUM GROSS DENSITY 5.4 DU/AC NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE AOZ iDO .Ci o: . ©�'GREEN HERON eP H d E N I X\ Li11111110111MIY..- P.U.D.MAASTER PLAN ASSOCIATES OP FLORIDA,INC. 1-2. v W1�11� S18 I T48S IR 26E nr.4..uirm, N4,.1 It WO r>al WWI;MIN.=V l - F 11111111111111111, \ RORIDA > \�.,.........N. ,..............>_..1, F-V,,rte POI-MASTER PLAN /,.. .._�StsY....._....... r : "` ?/ R. G ES SCALE°VOW 1`��^^�`�w��.rti.C: w' J:C :' 3851298 OR: 4050 PG: 2240 IMO=i MIMI Mold it Cole=err.M \r) 1111111116 u fl:ISM KKK I.MILL.COM KR NM111.M • Doetextesa l varus withoutreview or MC M 11.61 opinion of title by: M''n .M Kristin M. Conroy Kb: CONROT, CONK= i DURANT, P.A. 15 SKI R 2210 Vanderbilt Beach Road, Suite 1201 HU WNW Naples, Florida 36109 RPM NM Pared m Plumber: Warranty Deed This Indenture, Mede this day of dune , 2006 AG. Between Gulf Coast Center, LLC, a Florida limited Liability company at the Gamily et Collier , mute or Florida ,granter, .ea Radio Road Development, LW, a Florida limited liability company *bow address is 11983 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 100, Naples, FL 34110 .r tb.Cows*of Collier , Stsa of Florida ,grantee. Witaeaeth that the GRANTOR.for and in consideration ohm nam or TEN DOLLARS ($10) DOLLARS. sed oiler good end valuable asmidawon to GRANTOR at bad paid by GRANTEE.the mega wbewof is hereby admo.rsdeed.he geared,bemused and sold to the sad GRANTEE and GRANTEE'S heirs.swaths=end mimes breve.We Mowing deewiYed thud.mune. lyhs{andbesi lbecamerof Collier Male at Florida 'sown See attached Exhibit °A° incorporated herein by reference Subject to covenants, sae -taations of record: matters of plat: existing zoning ve !.tion: oil, gas and Mineral rights of re et there is no of entry and current taxes. • (t.I .:11111111/0 Cy and doe grantor does hereby hilly wanm the title to said lend and will defend the wow against bold clans of ill persons whomsoever Is Witness Whereof,to mentor het beams set in mad and seal the dry and yew Res.hove welisa Stesed,sealed sad delivered is oar presence: Gulf Coast - , • , a Florida 1 ted t•ili, A*- sy:: PHOENIX ASSOCIATES OF FLORIDA,INC. • CGC 11034149 W W W.PHOENIX-ASSOCIATES.COM Design Build General Contractor LEGAL DESCRIPTION—TRACT R&I SAPPHIRE LAKES(PARCEL10) August 11,2016 All that part of Section 33,Township 49 South,Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida and being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Section 33 Thence North 00'14'28"West 50.00 feet to the south line of tract 1"according to the plat there of as recorded in Plat Book 17,page 92 through 94 Public Records of Collier County, Florida;thence North 00'35'48"West 25.00 feet to the north line of said Tract I;thence along said north line South 89°24'12"West 1,404.81 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the tract herein described; Thence continue along said north line in the following two(2)described courses: South 89'24'12"west 1,241.27 feet;South 87'44'21"West 183.62 feet to a point on the east boundary line of Tract"R"according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 17,pages 92 through 94,Public Records of Collier County,Florida; Thence along said east boundary line in the following four(4)described Courses;North 02615'39"west 5.39 feet; Northerly and northeasterly 387.46 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 276.69 feet through a central angle 80'14'03"and being subtended by a chord which bears • North 37'51'22"East 356.57 feet;North 77'58'24"East 136.54;Easterly 68.50 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the north having a radius of 475.00 feet through a central angle of 08°15'46"and being subtended by a chord which bears North 73'50'31"East 68.44 Feet to a point on the Boundary of Tract SD"according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 17,pages92 through 94 Public Records of Collier County,Florida;Thence along said boundary in the following two(2) described courses; Thence South 27'32'47" East53.63 feet;Thence North 62'27'13" East 30.11 feet;thence leaving said boundary southeasterly 52.05 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 480.00 through a central angle of 06'12132"and being subtended by a chord which bears South 31'53'44" East 51.99 feet to a point of compound curvature; Thence southeasterly and easterly 119.63 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 123.29 feet through a central angle of 55'35'48"and being subtended by a chord which bears South 62'24'12"East 171.81 feet;thence North 89'24'12"East 171.81 feet;thence easterly and southeasterly 91.76 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the south having a radius of 180.00 feet through a central angle of 29'12'30"and being subtended by a thence South 61'23'18"East 87.02 feet;thence southeasterly and easterly 509.78 feet along the arc of a circular curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 1,000.00 feet through a central angle of 29'12'30 and being subtended by a chord which bears South 75°59'33"East 504.28 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the tract herein described. • CORPORATE OFFICES 13180 LIVINGSTON ROAD SUITE 204-NAPLES,FLORIDA 34109 P 239.596.9111 F 239.596.2637 $&9jnty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE 411 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergott.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUNIBERS(S) PL20150002852 I, Michael Kerner (print name),as Managing Member (title,if applicable)of Developmentconwtting LLC (company,If applicable).swear or affirm under oath,that I am the (choose one)owner applicant A contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application;and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed. sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We I authorize PhaeniA°ssoa•tesof F'wida•'ne to act as our my representative in any matters regarding this petition including I through 2 above. 'Notes. • If the applicant is a corporation,then it is usually executed by the corp.pres. or v.pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company(L.L.C.)or Limited Company(L.C.),then the documents should typically be4110 signed by the Company's "Managing Member • If the applicant is a partnership. then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership, • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the 'general partner"of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee" • In each instance,first determine the applicant's status, e.g, individual, corporate, trust, partnership. and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of pe;ury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts ed in it are true. `—Y ` C(11( A 11/03/2016 Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The,foregoing in trument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on /1-"3".„,r.; t Sp (date) by /11'GMIKL RN-IK (name of person providing oath or affirmation),as who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification)as identification. 671/4t) ,....)2 STAMP/SEAL Signature of Notary Public d Simone Phillips ,...1 StMCINE PHILLIPS • Cr Oa-COA-00115 155 i` �¢:i Commission#FF 100250 •Zr Expires July 9.2018 3/2/16 tf F &WO 10.nu trap'en ,,,anc.wo-so.rsn Page 6 of 9 Co icr County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.cotliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit In person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to ore-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE(Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL(Blasting Permit) 1 j SDP(Site Development Plan) ❑ BD(Boat Dock Extension) 0 SDPA(SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI(Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU(Conditional Use) ❑ SIP(Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP(Excavation Permit) 0 SIPI(insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP(Final Plat 0 SNR(Street Name Change) ❑ LLA(Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC(Street Name Change--Unplatted) ❑ PNC(Project Name Change) ❑ TDR(Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL(Plans&Plat Review) ❑ VA(Variance) ❑ PSP(Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP(Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP(Vegetation Removal&Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ(Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER 0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties(copy of lengthy description may be attached) 33 49 26 that parcel as desc in OR 2374 PG 253 (Tract R & I Sapphire Lakes) Parcel 10 FOLIO(Property ID)NUMBER(s)of above(attach to, or associate with,legal description if more than one) -0296440704 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES(as applicable, if already assigned) • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY(copy -needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME(if applicable) Sapphire Lakes PROPOSED PROJECT NAME(if applicable) N/A PROPOSED STREET NAMES(if applicable) N/A . SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER(for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL# Co ier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 Project or development names proposed for,or already appearing in,condominium documents(if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Green Heron DRI - Sapphire Lakes - � _ Please Return Approved Checklist By: [J Email D Fax 0 Personally picked up Applicant Name: Chris Lascano - Phoenix Associates of South Florida, Inc. Phone: (239) 596-9111 X203 Email/Fax: CLascano@Phoenix-Associates.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. • FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 00296440704 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: p?e)ta„ Date: 10/06/15 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED • iI al a 0 1 ■tea 2 11/4% % +� \ 3 a } .-a 4 ' ! \ k�, �n . :I:0HO � , k_e 4 ®t tn.* la � »v a ■ _ _=a • / 5 . > . n . € ® / a \2? Te, ` � \ % � ~ : /la 6 ..#6 } , \ I \ . Soo Ca \ I % b Barbara Blvd Santa ,Blvd , o \ k 2 \ ° i { { ƒ ` i \k AGENDA ITEM 4-D Co' er County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 8,2016 SUBJECT: PETITION NO.: PDI-PL20160002044, HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE OWNER/APPLICANT: AGENT: Wilton Land Company, LLC Alexis Crespo, AICP 206 Dudley Road Waldrop Engineering, P.A. Wilton,CT 06897 28100 Bonita Grande Drive, Suite 305 Bonita Springs, FL 34I35 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Hearing Examiner approve an insubstantial amendment to the Hammock Park Commerce Centre Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD)(Ordinance 07-30, as amended) to reduce the minimum perimeter PUD setback for accessory uses to 10 feet, and to add a deviation to allow accessory structures to be constructed prior to the construction of a principal use,only for two proposed accessory tower structures located along the western PUD boundary. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property consists of 18.99± acres and is currently undeveloped. The subject site is located in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road, in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Activity Center Number 7 includes the subject parcel. PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Applicant wishes to amend the Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD to allow two decorative towers, defined as accessory uses, to be constructed prior to the principal use. The placement of the towers along the western PUD boundary would require a reduction in the perimeter setback, which, according to LDC Section 4.06.02.D.4.c,may be reduced to 10 feet, providing that the width is increased proportionately,elsewhere along the same buffer. PDI-PL20160002044 Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPt1D Page I of 8 December 8.2016 HEX Revised: 11-15-2016 °a Z / 1 ' y! T ° ^.-tZ� T O r II R. aid H v G. ,:r. ..� �, • —� O a E fil a. a 2 41 41 Ct. t., it ig ,, a a N Milk , lit ' ri Tr - ' g 5 _ IV ;:itgliirt-10i i . sJ . - ...„. , ,4,51, Imp6.. , --- ' ' f' A. ; 7 1. t CNI, 0 .a E Z c 0 cu CI Q ©/118 JaiIIoa Cu 2 C 0 --NNN 0 _____ ,--- Q,, So E U 9 ,4� W au ki coco ti CIA-18 eiegre8 ewes = ��.`m _ is _ w y1 tg n ti U � 1 r d ; Z 9 W,on a� .., ,4 C 1 $ U ! S Qrorvn W s 2 41 3� + g r Aaii : 0 =oao1213a -1 4 61i 9 .� �_ _. 0 ti 4 P3 n 6 4.1 210 .,.PPM — �... Lei ir 0 it i L _.__ topiii 1 _l_ 93 ..._ Via,mow,.:.. - r r. (114:#4,‘ 2 1 : 1. sg „:.,....:46 116 .., j d _ I i—., ° i _.- --- SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING: Subtect: Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD;intensity: 160,000 square feet of office and retail. North: Undeveloped land, zoned Good Turn Center MPUD; intensity: 100,000 square feet of commercial;and,and an undeveloped parcel zoned Agricultural,density: 1 DU/5 acres. East: Undeveloped land,zoned McMullen MPUD; intensity: 185,000 square feet of commercial. South: Rattlesnake Hammock Road ROW, across which is an undeveloped commercial tract zoned Hacienda Lakes MPUD; intensity: 327,500 square feet of commercial and 70,000 square feet of professional and medical office. West: Collier Boulevard ROW,across which is the developed commercial tract of the Naples Lakes Country Club PUD, intensity: 110,000 square feet of commercial. 1f 1 r N 9 41 e'q.- k, w • 41 Ick 011 f d r 1. », -. i .. -�, . . ,.,e_ e -RWt71M Har+ne'laMO RrlMwwbtli/wr°s 4D .. .. .. 111 1Subject 1 1144 r1 Site 4.14 s So...DR Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD(CCPA) ANALYSIS: The subject site is within Activity Center Number 7 on the Future Land Use Map of the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan.The Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict allows the full array of commercial uses(C1 —C5). This CPUD is approved for a mixture of commercial uses, including retail and office uses,and customary accessory uses. The proposed amendments do not add or remove uses or increase use intensity. The proposed change will have a minor effect on abutting properties by permitting decorative accessory structures prior to the principal use. Sections 10.02.13.E.1 and 10.02.13.E.2 of the Land Development Code set forth the criteria by which insubstantial amendments to a PUD Master Plan and/or minor text changes to a PUD document are to be reviewed before they can be approved. The criteria and a response to each have been listed as follows: PDI-PL20160002044 Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD Page 4 of 8 December 8.2016 HEX Revised: 11-15-2016 10.02.13.E.1 a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development(PUD)? No,there is no proposed change in the boundary of the PUD. b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development? No,there is no proposed increase in the number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development. c. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation,conservation,recreation,or open space areas within the development in excess of five(5)percent of the total acreage previously designated as such,or five(5)acres in area? No,there is no proposed decrease in preservation, conservation,recreation,or open space areas within the development as designated on the approved Master Plan. d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to include institutional,commercial and industrial land uses(excluding preservation,conservation or open space),or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? No, the proposed amendment is to add two decorative accessory uses prior to construction of the principal use,and to reduce the setback. e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include,but are not limited to increases in traffic generation;changes in traffic circulation;or impacts on other public facilities? No,there are no substantial impacts resulting from this amendment. f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? The proposed change involves decorative accessory uses only, and will not create any additional vehicular generated trips based upon the ITE Trip Generation Manual. g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention,or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? No, the proposed changes will not impact or increase stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharge. h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? No. There will be no incompatible relationships with abutting land uses. PDI-PL20160002044 Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD Page 5 of 8 December 8,2016 HEX Revised: 11-15-2016 Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? No,this modification is in compliance with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan. j. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated as a Development of Regional Impact(DRI) and approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to Sec.380.06(19),F.S. Any change that meets the criterion of Sec.380.06(19)(e)2.,F.S.,and any changes to a DRI/PUD Master Plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under Section 10.02.13 of the LDC. Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD is not a DRI,so this criterion is not applicable. k. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s)any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under Section(s)10.02.13 E.? Based upon the analysis provide above,the proposed change is not deemed to be substantial. Section 10.02.13.E.2 Does this petition change the analysis of the findings and criteria used for the original application? (Rezone Findings are attached to this Staff Report as Exhibit"A".) No,the change proposed does not affect the original analysis,rezone,and PUD findings(attached). Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is seeking approval of a deviation from the requirements of the LDC. The deviation is listed in the PUD document. Deviations are a normal derivative of the PUD zoning process following the purpose and intent of the PUD zoning district as set forth in LDC Section 2.03.06 which says in part: It is further the purpose and intent of these PUD regulations to encourage ingenuity,innovation and imagination in the planning,design,and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership or control.PUDs... may depart from the strict application of setback, height,and minimum lot requirements of conventional zoning districts while maintaining minimum standards by which flexibility may be accomplished,and while protecting the public interest... Please see attached Deviation Justifications provided by the applicant. Deviation 1 —A deviation from Section 4.02.03.A of the Land Development Code, which requires accessory structures to be constructed simultaneously or following construction of the principal structure.This would allow two specific,decorative,tower structures to be completed prior to the completion of a principal structure. PDI-PL20160002044 Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD Page 6 of 8 December 8,20I6 HEX Revised: 11-15-2016 Petitioner's Rationale: HEX Decision 2014-28 permits Hacienda Lakes signage to be placed on the subject property. The petitioner believes that the decorative structures would support the overall design of the community and, by being built prior to the principal use, enhance the existing signage. Staff Analysis and Recommendation: Staff has no objection to this deviation, since the tower structures would serve as an entry feature, mirroring the structures south of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. Staff presents no analysis of the reduced PUD setback, since it is permitted under Section 4.06.02.D.4.c of the LDC. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING(NIM): The Applicant held a MM on October 19,2016 at 5:30 PM at the South Regional Library, 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway.One resident attended.No opposition was expressed. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney's office reviewed this Staff Report on November 16,2016. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve Petition PDI-PL20160002044. Attachments: A. Findings of Fact of the original Rezone B. HEX Decision 2014-28 C. Application and support documents PDI-PL20160002044 Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD Page 7 of 8 December 8,2016 HEX Revised: 11-15-2016 I PREPARED BY: +NW • 0 //-/..5--- /G FRED 0 CHL,AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: :)<-) . f �.. ;�y p // /• 777C j J `� e j df+#d}'•� ,�,r �` f ''� . h. / 1 RAYMO V. BELLOWS,ZONING MANAGER DAT ZONING IVISION 11— 1U —N 1. MIKE BOSI,AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION PD1-PL20160002044 Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD Page 8 of 8 December 8.2016 HEX Revised: 11-15-2016 Exhibit A REZONE FINDINGS PETITION PUDA-2006-AR-10030 Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD Chapter 10.03.05.G of the Collier County Land Development Code requires that the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission to the Board of County Commissioners shall show that the Planning Commission has studied and considered the proposed change in relation to the following, where applicable: 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals,objectives,& policies of the Future Land Use Map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan. Pro: The Comprehensive Planning Department has indicated that the proposed amendment is consistent with the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) land use designation of the Growth Management Plan(GMP). Con: None Findings: Based on the staff's review the amendment would be in compliance with the FLUE of the GMP and the Land Development Code (LDC). Since the current CPUD is amending the intensity of the permitted retail and commercial units the goals and objective of the GMP will remain. 2. The existing land use pattern; Pro: This project is adjacent to Heavy Commercial District (C-5); the permitted lower commercial land use in the CPUD will be consistent with the existing and proposed land use patterns as explained in the staff report. Con: The adjacent properties to the south and east are zoned Agriculture (A) and the property adjacent to the west is zoned Naples Lakes Country Club PUD a residential land use. Findings: The decrease of intensity of retail and commercial units is deemed acceptable for this site because the amendment complies with the GMP and LDC requirements and is consistent with the existing and future land use pattern in the area. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts; Pro: The parcel will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts because it is located within an Activity Center and is located within a close proximity of other approved commercial zoned properties. Con: None Findings: The proposed amendment is of sufficient size and is adjacent to commercially zoned properties; therefore,this CPUD will not create an isolated district. By virtue of its location within the Urban, Urban Commercial District, Mixed-Use Activity Center PUDA-2006-AR-10030 Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD Page 1 of 5 Subdistrict on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) this CPUD is deemed consistent with the GMP and LDC. 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. Pro: The requested action will not change the subject site in relation to the nearby property boundaries. Con: None Findings: The CPUD boundaries are logically drawn and they are consistent with the Mixed-Use Activity Center Subdistrict,as identified on the FLUM of the GMP. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. Pro: The request reasonable because is does not change the land use which continue to be in harmony with the surrounding area. Con: The proposed rezone amendment is not obligatory at this location. Findings: The rezone amendment is necessary because the project is decreasing its retail and commercial units to comply with Policy 5.1 and 5.2 of the Transportation Element which will make the CPUD consistent with the GMP. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood; Pro: The proposed rezone amendment should not adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood as the petition is consistent with existing uses and compatible with surrounding land use. Con: Once the retail and commercial units are built it could cause an increase in noise and traffic impacts on the nearby residences. However, due to the relative small size of the site and the proposed preserve and buffer areas and the decrease of commercial intensity,the proposed amendment should not adversely impact the adjacent properties. Findings: The proposed amendment has not changed its permitted land use and has been properly publicize to ensure the surrounding neighbors will be assured that the least amount of adverse impact on the adjacent developments have been addressed. In addition, the development standards and landscaping requirements contained in the LDC are intended to alleviate any adverse impact to the living conditions in this neighborhood if the proposed amendment is approved. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development,or otherwise affect public safety. PUDA-2006-AR-1 0030 Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD Page 2 of 5 Pro: The rezoning should not create excessive traffic congestion or otherwise affect public safety as the GMP requires adequate access to and from the project and the effect on pedestrian and vehicular circulation and safety. Since the property fronts on a public road it provides an immediate access to the arterial road network. Con: Urban intensification results in greater volumes of traffic on the local, arterial and collector road system serving the CPUD. Other projects dependent on the same street system may perceive this CPUD as one which will reduce their perceived comfort levels. Findings: The Transportation Services Division has reviewed the proposed CPUD to the concurrency management system and had the developer incorporate improvements to the county roads to retain consistency with Policy 5.1 of the Traffic Element of the GMP. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem; Pro: The proposed change should not create drainage or surface water problems because the LDC and GMP have regulations in place that will ensure review for drainage on new developments. Con: Staff will not determine if the new development will have drainage problems until the review of the development order. Findings: Every project approved in Collier County involving the utilization of property for some land use activity is scrutinized and required to mitigate all sub-surface drainage generated by developmental activities as a conditions of approval. This project was reviewed for drainage relationships and design and construction plans are required to meet County standards and regulations. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas; Pro: The CPUD conforms to the similar commercial development standards of the LDC which are designed to protect the circulation of light and air to adjacent areas. Con: None Findings: All projects in Collier County are subject to the development standards that apply generally and equally to all zoning districts and this project will be subject to those same standards. 10. Whether the proposed change will adversely affect property values in the adjacent area; Pro: Typically urban intensification increases the value of underutilized land and the proposed amendment should not alter the property values nor should it decrease or overtax the load on public facilities. Con: None Findings: Property valuation is affected by a host of factors including zoning; however zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination by law is driven by market value. The mere fact that a property is given a commercial zoning designation PUDA-2006-AR-10030 Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD Page 3 of 5 should not affect value because similar commercial zoning is permitted in the surrounding area. 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations; Pro: The LDC's criteria for review of each land use application to allow Planning Commission and Board of Commissioners to follow standardized review process which requires consistency of the GMP. Con: None Findings: The development of adjacent properties, in accordance with existing regulations, will not be affected if this rezone amendment is approved. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasting with the public welfare; Pro: Land Use applications are subject to the public hearing process to assure that the rezone thereby authorized shall not constitute a grant of special privileges inconsistent with the limitations upon other properties in the vicinity in which the property is situated. Con: None Findings: The proposed amendment does not alter the permitted land uses which meet the terms of the land use designation of the Urban Commercial District, Mixed-Use Activity Center Subdistrict on the FLUM, which is a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with the entire GMP. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning; Pro: The proposed amendment conforms to the FLUE of the GMP because it will be used in accordance with the existing commercial zoning. Con: None Findings: The property can not be developed in accordance with the existing zoning because the CPUD has sunsetted, however to deny the petitioner of the opportunity to develop would result in a legal land use taking which is unconstitutional as well not consistent with the goals and objectives of the GMP. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the County; Pro: The proposed amendment meets all objective criteria set forth for commercial zoning and conforms to the purpose and intent of the GMP and all its elements. Con: None PUDA-2006-AR-10030 Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD Page 4 of 5 Findings: The proposed amendment is designed in a manner that is compatible with surrounding property in size and scale. 15. Whether is it impossible to find other adequate sites in the County for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. Pro: The proposed CPUD is consistent with the FLUM because it is in the Urban Commercial District, Mixed-Use Activity Center Subdistrict. Con: None Findings: There are many sites which are zoned to accommodate the proposed commercial development. This is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a development. Each zoning petition is reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration,which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed,zoning classification. Pro: The land use pattern should accommodate carefully planned levels of development, protect existing uses, safeguard the environment, reduce sprawl, promote efficient use of land, encourage alternative modes of transportation and help to maintain a sense of community. Con: None Findings: While site conditions may restrict the location and square-footage of the homes it would not render the property unusable. Physical alteration is a product of developing vacant land which cannot be avoided. 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance,as amended. Pro: The proposed amendment meets all objective criteria set forth for commercial zoning and conforms to the purpose and intent of the GMP and all its elements. Con: The GMP encourages but does not require the synchronizing of development with the availability of public facilities needed to support that development. Findings: Staff reviews for adequacy of public services and levels of service determined that required infrastructure meets the GMP established relationships. Staff has reviewed this petition and found it consistent with all Elements of the GMP. PUDA-2006-AR 10030 Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD Page 5 of 5 EXHIBIT"B" FINDINGS FOR PUD PUDZ-A-2006-AR-10030 Hammock Park CPUD Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County Land Development Code requires the Planning Commission to make a finding as to the PUD Master Plans'compliance with the following criteria: 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas,traffic and access, drainage,sewer,water, and other utilities. Pro: The proposed rezone amendment is required to comply with all county regulations regarding drainage, sewer, water and other utilities. The Rattlesnake-Hammock Road (CR-864) and Collier Boulevard (CR-951) area is ideal for commercial environments within the urban district. Con: As with all land use actions that intensify urban development patterns, there is some loss of travel time for users of the same arterial road system. Findings: The proposed change keeps the land use of commercial while decreasing the intensity from 200,000 square feet to 160,000 square feet of allowable retail and commercial area. The petition will be compliance with all county regulations; therefore the project is suitable for the area. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Pro: The application has indicated that the project has evidence of unified control and will maintain common areas. Con: None Findings: Documents submitted with the application provide evidence of unified control. The CPUD Document makes appropriate provisions for continuing operation and maintenance of common areas. 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan(GMP). Pro: The propose amendment for the subject property is entirely consistent with the goals,objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan(GMP). PUDA-2006-AR-10030 Hammock Park CPUD December 21,2006 CCPC Hearing Page 1 of 3 Con: None Findings: The subject petition has been found consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the GMP. The staff report expounds in detail of how the project is deemed consistent with the GMP by virtue that the property is designated Urban Commercial District, Mixed-Use Activity Center Subdistrict, as identified on the Future Land Use Map(FLUM). 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. Pro: The CPUD has been designed to optimize internal land use relationship through the use of various forms of open space separation. Majority of the buffering requirements are regulated by the Land Development Code (LDC) to assure harmonious relationships between projects. Con: None. Findings: Staff analysis indicated that the petition is compatible, both internally and externally with the proposed uses and with the surrounding uses. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. Pro: The amount of open space was re-evaluated to assure that the project will be in harmony with the surrounding area. Con: None Findings: The amount of open space set aside is consistent with the provisions of the LDC and the GMP. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities,both public and private. Pro: The proposed CPUD will not adversely impact the timing or sequence of development that is currently allowed in the area. Con: None Findings: The adopted concurrency requirements ensure that further Level of Service (LOS)degradation is not allowed or the LOS deficiency is corrected. PUDA-2006-AR-10030 Hammock Park CPUD December 21,2006 CCPC Hearing Page 2 of 3 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. Pro: The petition does not add intensity to the CPUD as a result the subject property will not increase traffic or add adverse impacts to other public facilities. Con: Not applicable because the area is being reduced in size. Findings: The developer was required to assist in roadway improvements and relative to the improvements; development of the subject property is timely, because supporting infrastructure is available. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Pro: Staff has reviewed this petition for adequate public services and levels of service and found it is consistent with the Future Land Use Element land use designation and meets the regulations of the GMP. Con: None Findings: The criteria requires an evaluation of the extent to which development standards proposed for the CPUD depart from development standards that would be required for the most similar zoning district. The CPUD development standards are similar to those commercial standards. PUDA-2006-AR-10030 Hammock Park CPUD December 21,2006 CCPC Hearing Page 3 of 3 HEX NO.2014—28 HEARING EXAMINER DECISION PETITION NO. PDI-PL20140001187 — Petitioner, Wilton Land Company, LLC, requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 07-30, the Hammock Park Commerce Centre Commercial Planned Unit Development, to add deviations to allow one off-premises directional sign with a maximum height of 13 feet and a maximum sign area of 38 square feet for the Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI at the southwest corner of the subject property. The subject property is located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in Section 14, Township 50 South, Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida. DATE OF HEARING: September 25,2014 STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Approval. FINDINGS: Based on the applicant's written petition, testimony at the hearing of the applicant, and the recommendation of staff, the Hearing Examiner finds that the criteria set forth in Sections 10.02.13 E.1 and 10.02.13 E.2 of the Land Development Code has been met and the petition should be approved. DECISION: The Hearing Examiner hereby approves Petition Number PDI-PL20140001187, filed by Robert J. Mulhere, FAICP of Hole Montes, Inc. representing Wilton Land Company, LLC, with respect to the property described herein, for an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 07-30, the Hammock Park Commerce Centre Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD), to add deviations to allow one off-premises directional sign with a maximum height of 13 feet and a maximum sign area of 38 square feet for the Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI at the southwest corner of the subject property. Said deviations are as described in the amendment to the Hammock Park Commerce Center CPUD document attached as Exhibit "A" and the sign elevations attached as Exhibit"B", and are subject to the condition(s) set forth below. ATTACHMENTS: Exhibit A—Hammock Park Commerce Center CPUD amendment Exhibit B—Sign Elevations LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Ordinance No. 07-30, the Hammock Park Commerce Center CPUD [14-CPS-01355/1119293/1]31 1 of2 CONDITIONS: The applicant will provide an easement agreement with the owner of the Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI for their use of this off-premise sign prior to the issuance of the building permit for this sign. APPEALS: This decision becomes effective on the date it is rendered. Pursuant to Ordinance 2013-25, as amended, a Hearing Examiner Decision may be appealed to the Board of County Commissioners, Collier County. Appeals must be filed within 30 days of the date the Hearing Examiner Decision is rendered. RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AND EXHIBITS: SEE CLERK OF COURT, MINUTES AND RECORDS DEPARTMENT. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER FOR VARIANCES, CONDITIONAL USES, AND BOAT DOCK EXTENSIONS SHALL BE NOTED ON THE ZONING MAP FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES. 1 / 10 - - eb9 cti-L Date Mar Strain, Hearing Examiner Apr ved as to Form and legality: Scott A. tone Assistant County Attorney 114-CPS-01355/1119293/1131 2 of 2 EXHIBIT "A" SECTION ONE: Page 1 of 6 AMENDMENT TO THE COVER PAGE OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO.07-30,HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD The Cover Page of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No.07-30,Hanomock Paik Commence Centre CPUD,is hereby amended to read as follows: • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DOCUMENT FOR HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD A COMMERCIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PREPARED BY: RWA,INC. 6610 WILLOW PARK DRIVE,SUITE 200 NAPLES,FLORIDA 34109 AND ROETZEL AND ANDRESS 850 PARK SHORE DRIVE TRIANON CENTRE-THIRD FLOOR NAPLES,FLORIDA 34103 REVISED BY: HOLE MONTES.INC. 950 ENCORE WAY NAPLES.FLORIDA 3411Q DATE APPROVED BY BCC: 1-27-2007 ORDINANCE NUMBER:2007-30 REVISED EXEIIBIT A Page 1 of S Words ailefted are added;wadseleraree.are deletions 1l:1201412814041APerk Comma Cease PUD 01)141.201400011117)0-7-2014).dora EXHIBIT "A" $EGTION TWO: Page 2 of 6 AMENDMENT TO THE TABLE OF CONTENTS/LIST OF EIODBITS PAGE OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 07-30,HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD The Table of Com Page of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No.07-30, Hammock Park Commerce Centro CPUD,is hereby amended to read as follows: HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE SECTION I Property Ownership&Description SECTION II Project Development SECTION III Community Commercial District SECTION IV Preserve Area SECTION V General Development Commitments SECTION VI Requested Deviations from the LDC LIST OF EX IIBi' s EXHIBIT"A" PUD Master Plan Page 2 of 5 Wards gobilkid re Wet words areiri000lt w Makes ILV014N20140481WPIPDNtandwrilaNbsomosk Pak Comm CUM PUD(PD1411,40140e911i7)(3-7,7014)Ioatt EXHIBIT "A" SECTION THREE: Page 3 of 6 AMENDMENT TO SECTION II,PROJECT DEVELOPMENT,OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO.07-30,HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD Section II,entitled"Project Development"of the PUD Document t attached to Ordinance No.07-30,Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD,is hereby amended to read as follows: SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT 2.6 SIGNS Signs shall be in accordance with the IDC, as amended,jgroptiguieddullosksibiadu Section 6.1."Sign Deviations." & One off-premises directional sign for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI shall be permitted in the northeast quadrant of the intersection of C.R.951 and Rattlesnake a Hammpck Road.as depicted and labeled per Exhibit AA-1.This off-premises sign stall be allgwed in addition to other signage allowed by the LDC.The offp remises sign shat contain only the nye of the overall project and the insignia or motto of the entire developmea D. The off-premises dircctiongl sign for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI shall be no greater than 13 feet in heft.and total square footage of all sign copy areas(nae of the project and insignias or motto}shall not exceed 38 she feet(pee Deviations#1 and#2 under i Section 6.1.."Sign Deviations"), Page 3 of 5 Words Maud re added;wards re deletions H4170141201401111 Fart Cann s Caere PUD QrDIrP1•ml40001la7)($.7- l4),doez EXHIBIT "A" SKaoN O1JR: Page 4 of 6 ADDITION OF SECTION VI,REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC,TO THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 07-30,HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD Section VI,entitled"Requested Deviations from the LDC,"is hereby added to the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 07-30, Hammock Pads Commerce Centre CPUD, as follows: SECTION VI REOUBBTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC SIGN DEVIATIONS & Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section S.06.04.G.2.a to allow the offer directional sin for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI depicted on Exhibit A Lp hgye maximum of 38 square feet in sign area (total aware footage of all sign copy areas, including thepamo of the project and insignias or mottos).rather than 12 square feet as ]Wed in the LDC. E Deviation #2 seeks mlief from LDC Section 5.06.04.0.2.b to allow the offemisee flirectickaal Sian for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI decided on Exhibit A-1 to have a maximum hurt of 13 feet above the lowest canter igade ofthe roadway adjgcent to the scion location.rather than 8 fret as limited in the LDC. Page 4ofS Words adding oi,adds words sividANNIIPWO Modem H:12010001 Ps*Comma Contra IUD(1011141.201400011E7)(E-7. 014)doses I — EXHIBIT "A" SECTION ice: Page 5 of 6 ADDITION OF EXHIBIT A-1,OFF-PREMISES DIRECTIONAL SIGN LOCATION,TO THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 07-30, HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD Exhibit A-1, labeled "Off-Premises Directional Sign Location," attached hereto and incorporated herein, is hereby added to the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 07-30, Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD CXI IIDIT "A"'-- 0 il •• ' ; I Page 6 of 6 20' BUFFER I f~ I EsMT. (TW.) I : I a ( SUBJECT 1 PROPERTY r 100• CANAL RAI in I . 10.5' I < I HACIENDA LAKES IRTION SIGN V z 1Iii < i 10' UTIUTY I 4EASEMENT, 0 I L—— Ts- I _ 1 iiimiw"... ..ftsmiray...................7................r. 1 —11.4' Ca RATTLESNAKE !HAMMOCK ROAD 1 Cr 1 133' WIDE LURIGHT--OF—WAY J o I I i I lir II t"'" 1 oas1wv HACIENDA LAKESJ 1 BOUNDARY MARKER SKIN • I z HACIENDA LAKES 0 40 < PUD I DRI 1 0 ISCALE IN FEET EXHIBIT A-1 Wm aN4o.w i MUTt10 boomOFF-PREMISES 11,11404$ •A •, , , I nad« :arm crud N* awns wird DIRECTIONAL Ion MAI 1 111111183f11111141101111 PodloolooMNnom..t77! SIGN LOCATION an,o,4 °""jc,...p 1 .444.4 . t_,, re f Al. ss. , T ,,,,,/ .Z 10 )-±40( • - P " _ 4. 1 , _JJ ' 1 • ..:411'..0`1. i I I i 14, t,? 1 lxil • I '''' •'14 -. 4in4 t = . A . I II' IA ." . '' „4 ' .....1__./ .. 1 0 $1 h: 2 _ ...., , ...., s. I Pr7 I. . 44 .-..%. t -*r„-, .•*‘: "*""la, ›* . i 1 ; II, ____... i 1 t ,.. ni, fi .1I I •., \. / . - . _ s 1.f... ? :, • . ..,.''''.____--,„:or_117:4,0\ wr till I ,r, "., . . k i'-), Z . 113 M I ' Z74"."11 .,- 'I c'" ,.„_ Ti .7. ", e .... 4 ,. - •1,,,, ; 1 . I ,... / 144.......r.-,...i.iIi.1 ) tio =Pi • *' 'It''' '' ''''' —re) s.r . • „ f i:T1 .....c .,, ,,„ , . , --At ° 1;;Vj PL I lie j,...i._1 /I I „. • 44 I i i 'Ali ° 4 4• sr .s, le . -.4 . ,1 ; _ t - :-.1 .. . 4 i ‘..... . 1, . ‘41 AI I i ) I, . ..,7 4 t 41,'. r,a 9.. •,, II t 4 :.,1 e.1 so, , .41, ..'' , 4 1I t- , . . ,-, ' ''•I I, ,' ItiTi I I k i. .,tki :i 7a •.,i,:: . '4 rit r :.... , '/, tl VI I;P: 4 - +k i :........., .' ( 0 4 c '.., 4 ?f: Oa , 00 61 .II'V' . 1 II. 4.! g V Ai , ,Pg 1( • 1!>): tt t" */ ' ' ,'P s .., 6 t.4 ( _............ ca y ,; „,,40,,,, q 0,, • 6 . A 4'.4 1''.,.%,.4.41 .t°I.4' .7‘.-4it.' tftl 7 s S) Z g -i- . , ..,...14 .- q 8E rt 1, I— A. /I -----;! A rn / / > sl ! illr g : 1 Oi Er i ., 4 > ' 7 '--.:_, 1 ---1 - a...4N .4 *-•"?'7 n‘ I M .("f 4.. , 4 . 4- • / a XI ' ' 1 . . ,,,. . = .444'- ' /4 ,.4 I% ) ' '. ' - -n , fa A 4 4, S 7;• 1 . • 72 : k .'1 c , --- 1 ,_ . , Nr 11 '' ' ,. e/ \L. . - /— ' 1 I • - II X > 0'-;‘t el ''''''N''''''44.41. I I '''4 . ''`‘ d''• • '1 ' , ' I k CO I . ..,. .. , . ..b.....',.........- ,........I" , ;; CII) 1CO \ • 4 e ,..„ .• '4'. 4"4, t . . pa 74 . , 0 . . ... . ....,„ .. - --1--.. . , . hi 03 f---- .....,...., , - ;: • . ' \.: ----\\ ;, . ...„ , . , 1 'N.. 0 0 4 , . ,.,,....;--.=4„.,,. — , , , v__,-• _-;,-;•„-.„--„,„, ..*, N..... ---, 1 -__ _4 _,•-...,..,„:„ . ,.. `, Ns., "s--,.....„...,,, 1 N. ' I 0 1. •\ ... 0.....; rd'e -----„, rpi. gil,<, / 1; --y , a, , ,- ),- li10 gq, , \„... /pcft )0 \ 0 .. - g 1 i ita4 - RtiO 21g ; li 16 4 .- i s d v. o.... . 1.11Viir iiv Ok .\r - dr- IL ol 1 470-1 1 ,t L"-v .Ar; '''41 (1)*- ,4 Xl-. " p1 /16 •, ..,... K lx .4 it I I I AMENDMENT TO TABLE OF CONTENTS/LIST OF EXHIBITS,OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 07-30, HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD,AS AMENDED. Table of Contents/List of Exhibits, of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 07-30, Hammock Park Centre Commerce CPUD, as amended,is hereby amended as follows: HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE SECTION I Property Ownership&Description SECTION II Project Development SECTION III Community Commercial District SECTION IV Preserve Area SECTION V General Development Commitments SECTION VI Requested Deviations from the LDC LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT"A" PUD Master Plan EXHIBIT"A-1" Off-Premises Directional Sign Location EXHIBIT"C-1" Tower Locations EXHIBIT"C-2" Tower Renderings * * * * * * * * * * * * * Words underlined are added;works are deleted. AMENDMENT TO SECTION III, COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 07-30, HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD, AS AMENDED. Section III, Community Commercial District, of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 07-30, Hammock Park Centre Commerce CPUD,as amended,is hereby amended as follows: SECTION III COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT * * * * * * * * * * * * * 3.5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS * * * * * * * * * * * * * L. The two accessory tower structures described in Deviation 3 shall have a minimum PUD perimeter setback of ten(10) feet,and maximum actual height of thirty(30)feet. * * * * * * * * * * * * Words underlined are added;works ctrask ough are deleted. AMENDMENT TO SECTION VI, REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC, OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 07-30, HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD,AS AMENDED. Section VI, Requested Deviations from the LDC, of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No.07-30,Hammock Park Centre Commerce CPUD,as amended,is hereby amended as follows: * * * * * * * * * * * * * SECTION VI REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC 6.1 SIGN DEVIATIONS A. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.a to allow the off-premises directional sign for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI depicted on Exhibit A-1 to have a maximum of 38 square feet in sign area (total square footage of all sign copy areas, including the name of the project and insignias or mottos), rather than 12 square feet as limited in the LDC. B. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.b to allow the off-premises directional sign for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI depicted on Exhibit A-1 to have a maximum height of 13 feet above the lowest center grade of the roadway adjacent to the sign location, rather than 8 feet as limited in the LDC. C. Deviation#3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.03.A,which requires accessory structures to be constructed simultaneously with or following the construction of the principal structure, to instead allow accessory structures to be constructed prior to construction of the principal structure. This deviation shall apply only to the two (2) accessory tower structures at the location depicted on Exhibit C-1, "Tower Locations,"and further shown on Exhibit C-2, "Tower Renderings." * * * * * * * * * * * * * Words underlined are added;works ctrusk h are deleted. EXHIBIT C-1, TOWER LOCATIONS, IS HEREBY ADDED TO THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 07-30,HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD,AS AMENDED. Exhibit C-1,entitled"Tower Locations",attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby added to the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 07-30, Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD, as amended. Words underlined are added;works ct sk row are deleted. 0 o_ u ui Q 0 1111 N N 1 I PROPOSED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE I (TOWER-15'HEIGHT) ° i f.,,,,. 4, , . '."` - -4 I 100ACK-.. 1...- 1717) I 0) Ce U I I I Q I I LU w I PUD BOUNDARY O I (TYP.) . m B. E w I J _I I a O I Lurn .E, CR 951 RO00 W 1 .0 I CANAL ROW I tio w j LU PROPOSED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE 4 (TOWER-30'HEIGHT) y 112'3 a ✓ Ix MI rn I I I 0 I rn SI S2 c% RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK BLVD. w Lu 0 caY coV C 0) N HAMMOCK PARK PDI WALDROP 9 EXHIBIT C-I "TOWER LOCATIONS CIY,LENGNEERNENGINEERING m PREPARED FOR: 28100 BONITA GRANOF ORM•RUIIE 305 HACIENDA LAKES, LLC /TOLL BROTHERS 80NI7A S8RIN8S.1i 39135 P.23&9057777 F•.23940&7688 d EMIL InloSP001dropmehseeMI(.com CO EXHIBIT C-2,TOWER RENDERINGS, IS HEREBY ADDED TO THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 07-30,HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD, AS AMENDED. Exhibit C-2,entitled"Tower Renderings", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference, is hereby added to the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 07-30, Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD,as amended. Words underlined are added;works etruck lreugh are deleted. I 1 Aluminum Panel Roof i with Ratter Details Inset Shutter Detail ., 1Ih'i IL Stucco Finish 1 r Cost Stone Trim l E - 8 Shutter Derail �^ -�1 1 in i Stone Finish ,* 'I )t-- i ra- ). ....._ .- Secondary Tower Concept Aluminum Panel Roof c with Rorie,Details yW i11I ii 111 iii, C Inset Shutter Detoil d ~U U 1 i .i ; •r • EStucco Finish U Z 2 Cast Stone Trimi 111. 111111111110.11111r in , O Shutter Detail I 1 W f a Stone Finish I t�� t 1 j so di I is i ..). iiiiiiiiIiiiiiiiiii __ ^�`•.IE - - .-1 , f . ,,aI. ; .11.4_, `, . . n , r w` t -a-- g ` 1 30'Tower Concept 'DESIGNS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT TIME OF APPROVAL i 1 in HAMMOCK PARK PDI WA I D R 0 P N EXHIBIT C_2 "TOWER RENDERINGSr► ENGINEERING ENGINEERING ,1 I $ PREPARED FOR: IOWA NM NAME DONE•NM NM g HACIENDA LAKES, LLC/TOLL BROTHERS `_> 711.. iiiN. I ill W'ILDROP HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD ENGINEERING INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160002204 NIM SYNOPSIS • • WALDROP ENGINEERING CML ENGINEERING&LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS . *OS MWdtfA MOM OIL 1316 #> A SPIMIIos,R ai'f86 R&8! 6.7777 h 2304054111141 Memorandum To: Fred Reischl From: Lindsay F. Robin cc: Jim Manners; David Torres Date: October 20,2016 Subject Hammock Park PDI(PDI-PL20160002044) Neighborhood Information Meeting(NIM)Synopsis Waldrop Engineering, P.A., on behalf of Toll Brothers, Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC, and Collier County Staff, conducted a Neighborhood Information Meeting (NIM) on Wednesday, October 19, 2016. The meeting was held at 5:30 p.m.at the South Regional Library at 8065 Lely Cultural Parkway. The sign-in sheet is attached as Exhibit"A", and demonstrates one(1)resident was in attendance,not including the consultant team and Staff.A handout was distributed outlining the project overview and changes requested through the Insubstantial Change to a PUD(PDI)are attached as Exhibit"B". Alexis Crespo(Agent)conducted the meeting with introductions of the consultant team and Staff,and explained the insubstantial change to a PUB(PDI)application under review by the county.Ms.Crespo discussed the handout provided to the attendee and presented the accessory tower locations and an exhibit depicting what the proposed towers will look like. Both exhibits were taken directly from the submittal package. Ms.Crespo discussed the request and explained the towers are decorative in nature and are meant to enhance the entry to Hacienda Lakes. Ms.Crespo also outlined the public input opportunities throughout the process,and noted the upcoming Hearing Examiner would be scheduled near the end of the year. Ms. Crespo clarified that this hearing will not go before the Collier County Board of County Commissioners because the proposed changes are deemed unsubstantial. It was also stated that residents who received a notice of the NIM would also be receiving notice for that hearing. Following the Consultant's presentation, the meeting was opened up to attendees to make comments and ask the Agent questions regarding the proposed development. The following is a summarized list of the questions asked and responses given. Question/Comment 1: Are those cracks or stucco(on the tower rendering)? Response: That is stucco. • Page 1 of 2 Question/Comment 2:Hacienda Lakes property is on that side of the road(south side)? • Response:Yes. Question/Comment 3:Will these be lit?From the ground?From below? Response: There will be landscape "up" lighting at the bottom of the tower, but no lighting on the actual tower,or in the tower.Accent lighting if anything,but no beams of light coming from the tower. The LDC has requirements on lighting and we will comply. Question/Comment 4:No signage on these towers? Response:No. Question/Comment 5 and 6: Have the Hacienda Lakes wall graphics changed? Looks much better now. Response:Yes, it has been through one round of upgrades,but we will be enhancing it more. Question/Comment 7:What's the timing of approval to construct? Response:We are tracking January of next year, and the same towers on the other parcel(Hacienda Lakes MPUD parcel)are due to begin construction at the end of this year. There were no further questions or comments.Ms. Crespo thanked the attendee for coming and noted that her contact information is available for those who wished to contact her with any further questions. The meeting concluded at approximately 5:45 p.m. The meeting was recorded per the CD attached as Exhibit"C". • • Page 2 of 2 CD 0 -C:".."V\ A 7-1 d i s s d a .. it n ' " z 0 Z In IA o Z C micM m m ro c M Q N 13 - tu i 3 01 ii p At 0. ^ $ re co l 1 _____ .. S 0 ' -- 4 o 0 CD o aoc `� Cr a m 70 r12 0m rF o /� sr. ''f -7" C Z a re 0CT > CD 0 U) -3 O m 3 0 UP D � x c. a o = < 0 ; EXHIBIT "B" Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD (PDI-PL20160002044) • Neighborhood Information Meeting Project Information Sheet Wednesday,October 19, 2016 Project Size: 18.99+/-acres -- [NO CHANGE] Future Land Use:Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Subdistrict,Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistrict— [NO CHANGE] Zoning: Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD)-- [NO CHANGE] Approved Density/Uses: 160,000 square feet of retail and office uses -- [NO CHANGE] *Proposed Insubstantial Changes to the CPUD: • Modify the Table of Contents/List of Exhibits to add two (2) exhibits to the List of Exhibits (Tower Locations and Tower Renderings); • • Amend Section III, Section 3.5 Development Standards to allow the proposed accessory tower structures to be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the PUD boundary; and to be located within the required landscape buffers per LDC Section 4.06.02.D.4.C.; and to not exceed a maximum height of 30 feet; • Add a new Deviation to allow for accessory structures to be constructed prior to the construction of any principal use. i i • IAI %4 \LDROP HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD rINEERINQ INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) • PDI-PL20160002204 SIGN POST AFFIDAVIT • • • ,SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS (CHAPTER 8,COLLIER COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE CODE FOR LAND DEVELOPMENT) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen(15)calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s)must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to the Administrative Code,Chapter 8 E. 1. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five(5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s)must be securely affixed by nails,staples,or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post,or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place,and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost,or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER. AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 411) BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY,PERSONALLY APPEARED Alexis Crespo WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETITION NUMBER PDI-P 0160002204 C 28100 Bonita Grande Dr. #305 SIGNATURE OF PL NT OR AGENT STREET OR P.O.BOX Alexis Crespo Bonita Springs, FL 34135 NAME(TYPED OR PRINTED) CITY.STATE ZIP STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER c�r The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this I 7 day of OVfYY)1)et, 20 , by fit'[k1& Of-CAW , personally known to me or who producedas identification and who did/did not take an oath. f p vissimmarrieirelisiermirrailial f+i:�!."L. JACLYN MICHELLE "// Public de r' ? MY COMMISSION0FF986191 eli of Notary Public yy EXPIRES:May 3,2020 i % d 1 '' Bonded TMu Notary Public Undecw t rs `J/1,/'M Y it fl �h fy i i +�* 'a Printed amelof-Notary(Pu(bblic • My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) Rev,3/412015 tkik.,4 t % ,,±. , «uf"" _ *14§ +lies." 2rirs� , *�f„, , , . ,� - . . .£4 4 I NEARING REQUESTING AN INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE ! TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI fl PETITION #: POI-PL20160002044 HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUO IKUR0 VT 751 40111£1 CO3Wtt Stir010t t1Alt111R 11311 0P111004‘tA-'EN.Nl1E2E4l mull 3111(+11151!!,tt(110001 l Al 51355i45N1 153301 III MWCE N •..rs.141w.Y..w. v-.a o .,w..,,,,. *vii.S51M11M is NUSOCR i3NE*WW1 461114.CI4M,T5 UM 311 111110 k31RETE1POO RT5151 + - ... .—,.. T +� 4 ;. 411*MAW»i1'0 rat 11170100 I 5531151 5111101#50010011!0115111(0 TO MC EMIRYCEEO RIM ,t. . S CYNiMCOMC M I'SU 1121 07 11IMI 11{!11011 05(013552 21140 51555551511551555£10M5 111 + _, - ' *Mtn 4•••0M15MaI M 51X711011 Mir C-4 151 MON WO*N i11114 11 t!191134 Malanr ,:I.tt y y ' ' Mita 011101E 04M4S1 453011 M 511t1EAMIE 0MIM41100 551/Ms11I 1 1.ORK w 17MEClq.N 11(1 1 a .- II Iowan"i5#110110.1111113 N 7154.51115 011112.i3MMl1.LpWOR135 M 3(55.»sCMS ,- P 55 176 CASE 07C 514 4010 00001 C017AC2 5570 M+OL*,1te). ..1tiM1t1 ata t +" ,4= v.14,-1 A Mtn'M7 ES41117 0RFOREOCRt4CtlilltN4MNr i , Loanota 1114146 nosnomIs 47 ENG 5091 5NONTS U176E1ti1T swum too 10111 101SEE5oot ,i ' yk - O01A Wilt FLOMM 1 "k'. T "` tt I 4 . -1 + 's w`` • ilt PUBLIC HEARING REQUESTING'AN INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE y, 1 TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(POI) i s , PETITION#: POI-PL20160002044 HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD 1151011 T1t COLLAR LOUSei,41041511x0011115 012,. 1115111 N"0.0,n4000700. 5.1904 914:';01100*, itt 51091ST5 i5'15111YIIH 155515 3 Lr0110511 41 1151 11 CE 131510 'SI.44U5'r 5*55.ZCHtn 1(55115 1*30 10 511541 115 41011155 01041111!0,0}1`051. No 000111051 4115•0 r 1111 155 1510110100,101 10£1105 4LL/0EMSI*3511111111515 104/1508116 0l.±e '1_Nu40055 5*i 5b413409 01.Mt 011 150 5505/110 40531101/49105511110113 1X1151 5!41'11. 'Mei 444 5W 10/511.14,II 1W9XT19 Si t1,94I,..n 131 141010 31151 N 15011!0-1 914 3504ST 155111(1.1 .0(4110 55 M 555(51111(110010 N.5151131x/555100*5t10 EM 111151 55r1Hp h1153Cta15 4 111144 t 11055354 44 11015*115510 1151 001155 0091111 6++011 05/45305 3 1151..K33 *11 ,;431 DES 0.94011 50115 C/3'.:-:' +141.44-500. 1'011113:1005,44450 55059 :30 90119 9459.15.0+5,CI,.i1*1C•55- ,- :-:6',16 :-.L"K3t*F11iS6 E011ISER1 1EE7'SG SOC1 900511.11*SGEMSt 10it014 100 00515 041155501 • ,5574E 51i:E0 16.0101 10101 I %4 t[DROP ENGINEERING HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPDD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDJ-P120160002204 COVER LETTER • - /\ - WALDROP ENGINEERING /n \ CML ENGINEERING&LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS >rdBtN NOWA CM • , �\ IOWA Fl341U f ` Ps 28111411187777 Fs!!4067909 — August 16, 2016 REVISED SEPTEMBER 2016 Mr. Ray Bellows Zoning& Land Development Review Department Community Development& Environmental Services 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 RE: Hammock Park Commerce Centre (CPUD) Insubstantial Change to a Planned Unit Development(PDI) Dear Mr. Bellows: Enclosed for your review is an application for an Insubstantial Change to a PUD in regards to the Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD, an 18.99+/- acre project generally located on the northeast corner of Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and Rattlesnake Hammock Road in unincorporated Collier County. The Applicant is requesting one (1) new deviation through this application, and to modify the accessory structure . development regulations. BACKGROUND/EXISTING CONDITIONS The Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD was originally rezoned from Agricultural to Planned Unit Development in 2000 per Ordinance No. 00-79. In 2007, the Property was rezoned from Planned Unit Development to Commercial Planned Unit Development per Ordinance No. 07-30. The CPUD allows for a mix of commercial uses which have not been developed to date, and are not subject to Site Development Plan approval. The Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD was amended in 2014, per HEX decision 2014-28, to allow for ground signage associated with the Hacienda Lakes of Naples on the southwest corner of the property. REQUEST The Applicant is requesting Staff's approval of an insubstantial change to the Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD to allow for the following modifications to Section III, Community Commercial District; and Section VI, Requested Deviations from the LDC,approved per Ordinance 07-39 and HEX 14-28: • Modify the Table of Contents/List of Exhibits to add two(2)exhibits to the List of Exhibits; 0 Hammock Park Commerce Centre P01 Cover letter/Request Narrative Page 1 of 5 • • Modify Section III, Section 3.5 Development Standards, to allow the proposed accessory tower structures to be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the PUD boundary; to be located within the required landscape buffers per LDC Section 4.06.02.D.4.c.; and to not exceed a maximum height of 30'; • Add a new deviation to Section VI, Requested Deviations from the LDC, to allow for accessory structures to be constructed prior to the construction of any principal use. The additional deviation and modified development standards will allow for the development of two (2) architectural tower features to support the existing, approved Hacienda Lakes of Naples signage on the property. The deviation is required to allow for the construction of the tower features,which are accessory uses,to commence prior to the construction of a principal use within the CPUD. At present time,there are no imminent plans for development of commercial uses on the property. The deviation is appropriate as the tower features will directly support and enhance the aesthetics of the existing signage on the property, which serves as the main entry signs into the Hacienda Lakes of Naples MPUD. The modified development standards will allow for the towers to be setback 10 feet from the PUD boundary opposed to 25 feet as currently required on the approved Hammock Park Commerce Center CPUD Master Concept Plan.The reduced setback for the proposed accessory tower structures will not have a negative impact as there is an existing 115+/-foot canal and sidewalk that separates the CPUD from CR 951. Furthermore,the proposed tower locations do not conflict with existing signage and infrastructure. • The tower features,in addition to other aspects of the redesign,will enhance the Collier Boulevard corridor from a visual perspective. It is critical for visibility purposes that the tower features be closer to the PUD boundary than currently allowed. It is also important to note the Hacienda Lakes MPUD allows all accessory structures to be setback a minimum of 10 feet from the PUD boundary.Therefore,the proposed setback is consistent with other recent approvals. As proposed,the modified development standards and the additional deviation will allow for a unified and carefully planned main entrance to master-planned mixed-use community. Please refer to the enclosed Deviation Narrative and signage exhibits that further detail the appropriateness of the requested signage deviation and modification to the development standards. JUSTIFICATION/COMPLIANCE WITH LDC§10.02.13.E: The request complies with the thresholds for insubstantial changes to PUDs as outlined in LDC§ 10.02.13.E as follows: a. A proposed change in the boundary of the PUD; No,the request will not impact the existing PUD boundary. b. A proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development; • Hammock Park Commerce Centre PDI Cover Letter Page 2 of 5 No, the request will not increase the approved density or intensity, or the height of proposed buildings. c. A proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation or open space areas within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously designated as such,or 5 acres in area; No, the request will not result in a decrease of preserve, conservation, recreation, or open space areas. d. A proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential p Puses to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open spaces),or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses; No, the requests do not impact the size of non-residential areas or proposed to relocate such areas within the PUD boundary. e. A substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities; No, the request will not result in an impact to the development in terms of traffic and public facilities. The deviations being requested through this PDI will allow for enhanced visibility of an accessory structure. f. A change that will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers; No, the request will not generate a higher level of vehicular traffic. No change in land use activities is being requested. g. A change that will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or will otherwise increase stormwater discharges; No, the request will not result in increased requirements for stormwater retention or increase stormwater discharges. h. A change that will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use; No, the request will not modify any existing uses that would impact any surrounding land uses or that would be incompatible. The request will enhance the surrounding • Hammock Park Commerce Centre PDI Cover Letter Page 3 of 5 • area by providing an aesthetically enhanced main entrance into the Hacienda Lakes of Naples community. i. Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other element of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses; No, the request does not impact the project's compliance with the Growth Management Plan. The request Is limited to modifying accessory structure setbacks specific to the proposed accessory tower structures and adding one (1) deviation to allow an accessory use prior to a principal use, which also applies specifically the proposed accessory tower structures. j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. § 380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this LDC section 10.02.13;or • No, the request does not require a determination that the change will result in a substantial deviation. As noted above, the request will not Increase density/intensity, traffic generation, non-residential land uses, or decrease environmental areas. The request does not meet any of the criterion outlined in F.S.380.06(19)(e)2. k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s)any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this LDC section 10.02.13 No, the request is not a substantial modification to the PUD, and may be processed as a PD/pursuant to the LDC and Administrative Code. CONCLUSION: In summary, the proposed Insubstantial Change will allow for two (2) tower features to be constructed prior to the principal uses,with a PUD setback of 10 feet,and located within the required landscape buffer, subject to the provisions of LDC Section 4.06.02.D.4.c. The Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD was modified in 2014 to allow two(2)signage deviations to support the Hacienda Lakes of Naples PUD/DRI.This request is similar in nature and will allow the development of tower features to enhance the overall design an aesthetic appearance of a main entrance to a master-planned community on a highly visible and highly traveled corridor within Collier County. This application will not negatively impact public health, safety or welfare,and the CPUD will remain consistent with the LDC and Growth Management Plan(GMP). • Hammock Park Commerce Centre PDI Cover Letter Page 4 of 5 The following items are enclosed for your review: 1. A check in the amount of$2,525 for the application fees; 2. One(1)copy of the completed PDI Application; 3. One(1)copy of the Pre-Application Waiver E-mail from Ray Bellows; 4. One(1)copy of the Cover Letter/Project Narrative detailing the purpose of the request; 5. One(1)copy of the Current Master Plan& 1 reduced copy(8 W'x 11"); 6. One(1)copy of the Revised Section III,Development Standards,and Section VI, Requested Deviations from the LDC,of the PUD document in strikethrough/underline format with Exhibits C-1 and C-2; 7. One(1)copy of the Recorded Warranty Deed; 8. One(1)copy of the Requested Deviations and Justifications; 9. One(1)copy of the Legal Description; 10. One(1)copy of the Affidavit of Authorization; 11. One(1)copy of the approved Addressing Checklist; 12. One(1)copy of amended Title Page with Ordinance#;and 13. One(1)copy of the Location Map(8.5"X11"). Should you require additional information or have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly at (239)405-7777 or lindsay.rodriguez@waldropengineering.com. Sincerely, WALDROP ENGINEERING,P.A. • Lindsay F. Rodriguez,MPA Project Planner Enclosures cc: Jim Manners,Toll Brothers David Torres, Hacienda Lakes of Naples, LLC • Hammock Park Commerce Centre PDI Cover Letter Page 5 of 5 NI W'ALDROP HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD ENGINEERINGINSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160002204 APPLICATION $*5nty • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PUD (PDI) WC subsection 10.02.13 E&Code of Laws section 2-83—2-90 Ch.3 G.3 of the Administrative Code Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.2, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 and shall require the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application. PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION • Name of Applicant(s): Wilton Land Company, LLC Address: 206 Dudley Rd. City: Wilton State: CT ZIP: 06897 Telephone: Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: Name of Agent: Alexis Crespo, AICP Folio#:00416720000 Section: 14 Twp: 50 Range: 26 Firm: Waldrop Engineering, P.A. Address: 28100 Bonita Grande Dr. #305 City: Bonita Springs State: FL ZIP: 34135 Telephone: (239) 789-5146 Cell: (239) 850-8525 Fax: (239) 405-7899 E-Mail Address: alexis.crespo@waldropengineering.com 6/17/2015 Page 1 of 5 Co ler County S COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 IDISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Is the applicant the owner of the subject property? n Yes No _ El 1. If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name the beneficiaries below. 2. If applicant is corporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers and major stockholders below. E 3. If applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, so indicate and name principals below. H 4. If applicant is an owner, indicate exactly as recorded, and list all other owners, if any. 5. If applicant is a lessee, attach copy of lease, and indicate actual owners if not indicated on the lease. • 6. If applicant is a contract purchaser, attach copy of contract, and indicate actual owner(s) name and address below: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) DETAIL OF REQUEST On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. PROPERTY INFORMATION PUD NAME: Hammock Park Commerce Centre ORDINANCE NUMBER: 2007-30 FOLIO NUMBER(S): 00416720000 Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). If applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a legal description for subject portion. Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change. • Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? Al Yes n No 6/17/2015 Page 2 of 5 'er County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 If no, please explain: Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? (1 Yes © No If yes, in whose name? Has any portion of the PUD been SOLD and/or Li DEVELOPED? Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? Yes 0 No If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet. • • 6/17/2015 Page 3 of 5 Co "r County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 Pre-Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Insubstantial Change Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code • The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal,the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED Completed Application(download current form from County website) 16 ❑ C Pre-Application Meeting notes 1 —] R1 Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes 16 Q ❑ and why amendment is necessary _,._ Detail of request 6 0 Current Master Plan& 1 Reduced Copy t6 ❑ C Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy ❑ Li ❑ • Revised Text and any exhibits ❑ LI i . CI document with changes crossed through & underlined iii PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance# Ti ❑ ❑ , Warranty Deed � � n Legal Description Boundary survey,if boundary of original PUD is amended ❑ LI ❑ If PUD is platted, include plat book pages ❑ C ❑ List identifying Owner&all parties of corporation 2 L Ti Affidavit of Authorization,signed & notarized 2 0 ❑ Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Copy of 83/2 in. x 11 in.graphic location map of site 1 x C Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise:The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials ❑ H ❑ to be submitted electronically in PDF format. *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing,include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. • 6/17/2015 Page 4 of 5 Co Ike County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 PLANNERS—INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ School District(Residential Components):Amy t ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Lockheart Executive Director ❑ Utilities Engineering:Kris Vanlengen ❑ Parks and Recreation:Vicky Ahmad [] Emergency Management:Dan Summers ❑ Naples Airport Authority:Ted Soliday ❑ Conservancy of SWFL:Nichole Ryan , ❑ Other: El City of Naples:Robin Singer,Planning Director ❑ _ Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS X PUD Amendment Insubstantial(PDI):$1,500.00 X Pre-Application Meeting:$500.00 x_ Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner:$925.00 The completed application,all required submittal materials,and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Department/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center ill 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples,FL 34104 r f♦ l 8/8/2016 Applicant •wner Signa re Date Alexis Crespo Applicant/Owner Name(please print) • 6/17/2015 Page 5 of 5 giW ALDROP HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD LN6IIWEEH,NG INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160002204 EMAIL FROM RAY BELLOWS WAIVING PRE-APPLICATION REQUIREMENT • • Alexis Crespo • From: BellowsRay <RayBellows(colliergov.net> Sent Monday,August 08,2016 6:23 PM To: Alexis Crespo;Chris Scott Cc: Jackie Larocque;Jeremy H.Arnold; Lindsay Rodriguez;Sabrina McCabe Subject: RE:Hammock Park&Hacienda Lakes Accessory Towers Hi Alexis, In response to your request for a pre-app waiver for the Hammock Park PDI, please note that the waiver has been approved since staff has had previous meetings on this issue. I also agree that a PDI for the Hacienda Lakes will not be required since the tower element is an accessory entry feature or structure with a minimum 10-foot setback. Please let me know if I can be of any other assistance. Raymond V.Bellows,Zoning Manager Zoning Division-Zoning Services Section Growth Management Department-Planning &Regulation Telephone:239.252.2463;Fax:239.252.6350 County • From:Alexis Crespo fmaiLto:Alexis.CresPO( waldrouenaineering.com] Sent: Monday,August 08,2016 10:33 AM To: BellowsRay; Chris Scott Cc:Jackie Larocque;Jeremy H.Arnold; Lindsay Rodriguez; Sabrina McCabe Subject: Hammock Park&Hacienda Lakes Accessory Towers Good Morning, As Chris is aware our office filed two(2)SDPA's to allow for accessory tower features on the northeast and southeast corner of Collier Blvd and Rattlesnake Hammock. These towers compliment the design of the Hacienda Lakes entry signage.The northern towers are subject to the Hammock Park CPUD—and we found are not consistent with the PUD for two(2)reasons:first the towers do not meet the 25'accessory setback;and secondly,there are no existing principal structures within the CPUD to allow for an accessory structure to be constructed. We are preparing PDI to address both of these issues.By way of this email we are requesting a pre-app waiver,since we've had meetings with staff on this,and in-depth discussions with Chris.I understand Mark Strain has opined that the PDI process is the way to go. On a separate but related note,we are hoping that a PDI will not be required for the towers proposed in Hacienda Lakes. • The MPUD allows for 10'accessory setbacks from the property line for commercial tracts,and there are existing principal structures constructed in the overall MPUD.An alternative interpretation is the towers are accessory to the 1 constructed signage.We have not received any review comments on the SDPA that would indicate a PDI is needed for the towers in Hacienda Lakes,so we are just trying to confirm that in an abundance of caution. Sorry for the lengthy email—we appreciate your continued help as we work through this issue. Thanks, Alexis V.Crespo,AICP,LEED AP Vice President of Planning INWAl.. DROP ENGINEERING ::hts fNf l�fI . %JJI M: IMMVA!*,aOiIfICrudtf Direct:E:alexisc@waldrooenRineerinR.com I C:(239)850-8525 Office:P:(239)405-7777 I F:(239)405-7899 www.waldrooenitineerina.com NOTICE: Upon receipt of any electronic Me/data from Waldrop Engineering P.A.,you are agreeing to the following:This file/data is for Informational purposes only. It is the responsibility of the redphmt to recondle this electronk flee/data with the actual project site conditions. Recipient agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Waldrop Engineering.P.A.for any defects or errors in this file/data. Under Florida Law,e-mail addresses are public records.If you do not want your e-mail address released in response to a public records request,do not send •electronic mail to this entity Instead,contact this office by telephone or in writing • 2 mi AI DROP HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD • INENGINEERINGINSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160002204 CURRENT CPUD MASTER PLAN 111 • I libi 4 fi r . P - ; i1 0110 1 1 1 mi fl / I 1 iv 1 a I ! ! pi Hi i i pp ' gg i 0 abp.... I , i t II ,bitoi x 4 sl . „ ,1 i_ 0 I � 1"" III t x f ' i.;. O 1 ; ! lil11g1ii ! i . 1 d1 I Ilr id , i Alrsd1l Eli '-‘ 4 = , ' , It ii6111 ( 1 q g ..,4 'a I 4''i td I ; 1 ! AM 11111111111101wwr� 1 ir 11 t, ” iin, "_ ai .c a �j � ' _-__ r w . rr l ` ' r , iii i IP 1 • his 11a ¢ i I I , L it si. 1 , ! �1 i s1$�iIii II iii -1k ( t i ,� ��.L , N)1 II . W , �� iI 4 t ! —040totin--.- ) . i .I . . . I. ] VO ,:a"-"'—'1 • ,A, (ri ti , I i, �fi . L - r I ! 1,44.%. it I 1 I •A .M IMP.* f j - - .___.__._, ___ ' � 5 ti 1(1 lFIF.' -/:-.77.7.77- z ',.'.4; ' }t ~ ) > , 0 i� �+ ��rl i NI lir I I gill.0,Awwww.1sw2 �i1 ' INWill.) HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) 11, REVISED SECTION III, DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SECTION IV, REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC • OF PUD DOC IN STRI KETH ROUGHIUN DERLI NE WITH EXHIBITS C-1 AND C-2 • AMENDMENT TO TABLE OF CONTENTS/LIST OF EXHIBITS,OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 07-30, HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD,AS AMENDED. Table of Contents/List of Exhibits, of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 07-30, Hammock Park Centre Commerce CPUD,as amended,is hereby amended as follows: HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE SECTION I Property Ownership&Description SECTION II Project Development SECTION III Community Commercial District SECTION IV Preserve Area • SECTION V General Development Commitments SECTION VI Requested Deviations from the LDC LIST OF EXHIBITS EXHIBIT"A" PUD Master Plan EXHIBIT"A-1" Off-Premises Directional Sign Location EXHIBIT"C-1" Tower Locations EXHIBIT"C-2" Tower Renderings * * * * * * * * * * * * • Words underlined are added;works atr #rough are deleted. AMENDMENT TO SECTION III, COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT, OF THE PUD 1 DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 07-30, HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD,AS AMENDED. Section III, Community Commercial District, of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 07-30,Hammock Park Centre Commerce CPUD,as amended,is hereby amended as follows: SECTION III COMMUNITY COMMERCIAL DISTRICT * * * * * * * * * * * * * 3.5 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS * * * * * * * * * * * * * L. The two accessory tower structures described in Deviation 3 shall have a minimjun PUD perimeter setback of ten(10)feet.and maximum actual height of thirty(30)feet. * * * * * * * * * * * * • • Words ynderlined are added;works strek-through are deleted. • AMENDMENT TO SECTION VI, REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC, OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 07-30, HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD,AS AMENDED. Section VI, Requested Deviations from the LDC, of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No.07-30,Hammock Park Centre Commerce CPUD,as amended,is hereby amended as follows: * * * * * * * * * * * * * SECTION VI REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC 6.1 SIGN DEVIATIONS A. Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.a to allow the off-premises directional sign for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI depicted on Exhibit A-1 to have a maximum of 38 square feet in sign area (total square footage of all sign copy areas, including the name of the project and insignias or mottos), rather than 12 square feet as limited in the LDC. • B. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.04.G.2.b to allow the off-premises directional sign for the Hacienda Lakes PUD/DRI depicted on Exhibit A-1 to have a maximum height of 13 feet above the lowest center grade of the roadway adjacent to the sign location,rather than 8 feet as limited in the LDC. C. Deviation#3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.03.A.which requires accessory structures to be constructed simultaneously with or following the construction of the principal structure. to instead allow accessory structures to be constructed prior to construction of the principal structure. This deviation shall apply only to the two (2) accessory tower structures at the location depicted on Exhibit C-1. "Tower Locations,"and further shown on Exhibit C-2."Tower Renderings." * * * * * * * * * * * * * • Words underlined are added;works struck-trough are deleted. EXHIBIT C-1,TOWER LOCATIONS, IS HEREBY ADDED TO THE PUD DOCUMENT • ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO.07-30, HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD,AS AMENDED. Exhibit C-I,entitled"Tower Locations",attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference,is hereby added to the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No.07-30, Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD,as amended. 4110 • Words underlined are added;works struck-tiweugh are deleted. 0 0 • 1; tii J a 0 En N ' PROPOSED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE (7 TOWER-15'HEIGHT) 1 1 10.0'SETBACK—.,- 1+- X I U 1 I 0core co 0 w 1 o ? r PUD BOUNDARY it p 1 CC ca if> SCR 951 ROW 100.0' _ CANAL ROW 0 1 O I PROPOSED ACCESSORY STRUCTURE N (TOWER-30'HEIGHT) o w 4 ttrt ks 1 c us its 1 1 1 9 1 C 1 E m m ao RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK BLVD. coinC c W 0 O Yrn m J 1 m 1 0 HAMMOCK PARK PDI ENGINELD RIOP G EXHIBITC-1 "TOWER LOCATIONS" CIVIL ENGINEERINGI MANNING I LARCOCARE ARGMTECTINIE 9 PREPARED FOR: 214100m+RABUM*DOM•SIM 305 2 HACIENDA LAKES, LLC/TOLL BROTHERS IN 23,1-4054777 il 221)408-78,11 l EXHIBIT C-2,TOWER RENDERINGS, IS HEREBY ADDED TO THE PUD DOCUMENT • ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO. 07-30, HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD,AS AMENDED. Exhibit C-2, entitled "Tower Renderings",attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. is hereby added to the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 07-30, Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD,as amended. • • Words underlined are added;works struck-through are deleted. ! .� iii,. r aI I. t_i_mic.... , - Secondary Tower Concept '4 gil/Ili 2111.t.. ., i 1 = • : _ r a r . 4111— I n 1 X • W W co N co ii. j - 11 s l W oi _ A i.—=. t_____4: 1 ce. II L w 1 .ill Fa 1 w ; 114--... ft o • r • W rc • 0 i 30' Tower Concept •DESIGNS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE AT J as TIME OF APPROVAL I, `m HAMMOCK PARK PDI WALDROP a, EXHIBIT C-2 "TOWER RENDERINGS" ENGINEERING CNq ENGINEERIND I PUNNING'LANDSCAPE NRCNRECtVRE PREPARED FOR: 26100 MA EO „WM•SLUE 305 P MAMAMI HACIENDA LAKES, LLC /TOLL BROTHERS R,3NOb7777.GNIBNPc E1,_ 77 is 2311.406.78911 ma. ......4c.... m INIENNG HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) • PDI-PL20160002204 REQUESTED DEVIATIONS & JUSTIFICATIONS • • WALDROP ENGINEERING CML EJ116EIIEEIW 8&LAND DEVELOPMENT CONSULTANTS 11 JUSTIFICATIONS FOR REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD Deviation 3: Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.03.A. which requires accessory structures to be constructed simultaneously with or following the construction of the principal structure. to instead allow accessory structures to be constructed prior to construction of the principal structure.This deviation shall apply only to the two(2)accessory tower structures at the location depicted on Exhibit C-1, "Tower Locations," and further shown on Exhibit C-2, "Tower Renderings". Justification:The purpose of this deviation request is to allow accessory structures on the Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD to be constructed prior to any of the principal use structures approved per Ordinance No.07-30,Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD. The Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD was amended in 2014,per HEX decision 2014-28,to allow the Hacienda Lakes of Naples signage to be placed on the subject property. Approval of this deviation will allow the Hacienda Lakes of Naples DRI to construct architectural tower features in two(2)specific 41) locations along Collier Boulevard(CR 951)to support the overall design of the community,and enhance the existing Hacienda Lakes signage. As depicted on the attached Exhibits C-1 and C-2,the proposed tower features(accessory structures)will provide an aesthetic enhancement to the Collier Boulevard corridor. The primary tower/accessory structure is located on the northeast corner of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and Collier Boulevard (CR 951) and will be a maximum height of 30 feet. The secondary tower/structure proposed along Collier Boulevard will be a maximum of 15 feet in height.The towers are setback significantly from the roadway due to the 112+/- foot drainage canal, which impacts visibility of structures placed on the property, including the tower structures. The canal provides additional setback from the travelling lanes of Collier Blvd.to meet the intent of the LDC.As such,the proposed accessory uses will not be detrimental to public health,safety or welfare.For these reasons,the Applicant respectfully requests approval of this deviation. • Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD PDI Deviation Narrative Page 1 of 1 1ti,1U 0P HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD �NEER�NG INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) , PDI-P120160002204 BUFFER EXHIBIT ff�flrf gram I d0 I S33KS fNeIfF11,6 ti.i,1yf1i66411 8Mp)03zo66S awyrnmd slimy limas moo lift 31111111-11111111311M12181111111 MN i flIHX3 Wdddflg 1H133NI9N30010OPNTIN NOILVNIVOILINV Aosur d O H a-1 dM i IQd Itld X301 YHVH 9uv.1s0«aILLIMMs»OOA3a smoIs1A3»WV 12!ill L5 11 IZ 7111111142. 1!1111 Z Irl -�� Z LLiii I Ei<WWiI LLY Jo 111111 oel 7r W~ LL 2 COO O OK p re O §' giHg F m nO C p`p1 6 re i V z ilpro"°%no'DA%4 oc� olo° o on -- lr 40( ''''.41,46)11;114 • v i •ounoorooc�P �o 0000noor,- — oo„000l000' : , �o • � ooc000AMMOMosimmro• a, O _ �' O .01 x Al =ui -�_._� -._ • r ui ui o8 m m tm J W WUCI 0 2 W Wm 1 7 Cluj-9 a.J W wz 8 zm w_ I 1 1 ;. ~; 1,, 2. -781 8i m , , , k "Jul -$ 1 11 = WID I 1 W = II ' ttz z 0 W li W Z i: Y Fui ty, sr W co �' , 2 r40 f LLre O J N ,_ j RZ .• li ac t .st it ii ..illi 1 8 Si g if k\\\I-- --- , w El Ill i ;..,, ,.k .w. 0 N a w w 'Sr VIP w - - -. ' ^ w r w r1► •. r 6r -► LL. . _ _ -- } ._-___ ________ _ _ ___. _ _ _ _ ____ ______ .___ ....._ ____r.” iSsa9 - - - 1a 61,01,037.08r9191ald Wa11oOW.QI4X3 uoga6uedwo0 APB P03-Z0-84OfinnetS L4U3(Iaa'DWI sP' °'H)ZO.64S141oo{oid1:9 Vt Al DROP HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD ENGINEERING INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) • PDI-P120160002204 INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO PUD DOCUMENT FOR CAO • • • Hammock Park Commerce Center CPUD Amend Ordinance 07-30 AMENDMENT TO THE TABLE OF CONTENTS/LIST OF EXHIBITS PAGE; SECTION VI,REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM THE LDC; OF THE PUD DOCUMENT ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NO.07-30,HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTER CPUD The Table of Contents Page of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No.07-30, Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD, is hereby amended. The"Community Commercial District," labeled as Section III of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No.07-30,the Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD,is hereby amended. The"Requested Deviations from the LDC,"labeled as Section VI of the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No.07-30,the Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD,is hereby amended. The Exhibit C-1,labeled"Tower Location",and Exhibit C-2,labeled"Tower Renderings,"attached hereto and incorporated herein,is hereby added to the PUD Document attached to Ordinance No. 07-30,Hammock Park Commerce Centre CPUD. 41 • I ' 1t LDROP HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD ENGINEERING INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) • PDI-P120160002204 RECORDED WARRANTY DEED • • INSTR 4721067 OR 4819 PG 3122 RECORDED 7/24/2012 12:16 PM PAGES 5 DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT, COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC8.70 526,600.00 REC 544.00 CONS S3,800,000.00 • Prepared by(and return tol: Howard S.Miller,Esq. Law Firm of Trenam Kemker 200 Central Avenue,Suite 1600 St.Petersburg, Florida 33701 Parcel Identification Number(s):00416720000 and 00417760001 SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED ia THIS INDENTURE is made and entered into as of the 2.)Vday of July, 2012, by and between SEMBLER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP #42, LTD., a Florida limited partnership ("Grantor'), whose mailing address is 5858 Central Avenue, St. Petersburg, FL 33707, and WILTON LAND COMPANY,LLC, a Florida limited liability company("Grantee"),whose mailing address is 3921 Prospect Avenue,Naples,FL 34104. WITNESSETH, that Granto • - t• .•!,- • %-i;•n of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other g•• • ^ uable .. . in hand paid, the receipt and sufficiency whereof is hereby = _•ged, has granted, •=rg ned, sold, alienated, remised, released, conveyed and con - , • - - -nts . • hereby grant, bargain, sell, alienate, remise, release, s• - an. co • rtes, - • ,c rantee's heirs, successors • and assigns forever, the fo . •- _ the,Cou of Collier, State of Florida,to-wit odif fj r 616.-1 AND INCOR : TED HEREIN BY .E F=21 ; . THERETO, 0 TOGETHER with all ailments, hereditam ;�- • appurtenances, and every ;-_, privilege, right, title, interest and ", ,-rsion = r`i� - -a and easement thereto belonging or in anywise appertaining(col - - -*4;1/. �'• SUBJECT TO the encumbrances and exceptions described on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference thereto (collectively, Permitted Exceptions"); provided, however, that neither Grantor nor Grantee intend to reimpose any Permitted Exceptions nor shall this conveyance operate to reimpose or extend any Permitted Exceptions. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. And Grantor does hereby warrant the title to the Property, subject to and except for the Permitted Exceptions, and will defend the same, subject to and except for the Permitted Exceptions, against the lawful claims, of all persons claiming by, through or under Grantor, but against none other. [SIGNATURES CONTAINED ON FOLLOWING PAGE] • 6621352v3.121459 Page 1 of S OR 4819 PG 3123 • SIGNATURE PAGE TO SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED BY SEMBLER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP#42,LTD. TO AND IN FAVOR OF WILTON LAND COMPANY,LLC IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused these presents to be signed and sealed the day and year above written. Signed,sealed and delivered in the presence of: j /'lir - SEMBLER FAMILY PARTNERSHIP#42, Hess r LTD.,a Florida limited partnership Print Witness Name: ra.,wt.L-Wil- • Lilsdifi) C./. By: Sembler Retail II,Inc.,a Florida Witness Signature corporation,its General Partner Print Innen Name: ._ -1 ..... e. tib, Its: 41.2s; I. „filo 7717.eel n CC e 41110 rVI STATE OF FLORIDA '�,,'_, ( COUNTY OF PINELLAS The foregoing instrument was - ;: • ► i_ = me.this I°I day of July, 2012, by art ci ark4 5• S t ry1.b 9rJ.S1•0/0 dr— of Sembler Retain!, Inc.,a Florida corporation,as General Partner of Sembler Family Partnership#42, Ltd., a Florida limited partnership, on behalf of said corporation and partnership. He is[select one]: ( �rsonally known to me; or ( ) produced a valid driver's license as identification. i 4 OP I I If(._1 •it'AtJ? -.° fr Nota . ublic-(Signature) AioPri me: M Commission Expires: 4}igant * MIEUYCC Ip t MIN EXPSEB:AO 36,2018 • Ceirref" ItelilimestplIkesSoie„ 6638352v3-121459 Page 2 of$ OR 4819 PG 3124 • EXHIBIT A Legal Description of Property THE LAND REFIRED TO HEREIN BBoW IS SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF Collier,STATE OF Weida,AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Parcel 1(14): The S 1/2 ofthe S 1/2 of the SW 1/4 ofthe SW 1/4 of Section 14,Township 50 South,Range 26 East,Caller Coady, Radda,LESS the Wast 200 feet ND Parcel 2(15): The N 1/2 of the S 212 dthe SW 1/4 d the SW 1/4 of Section 14,Tamable 50 South,Range 26 East;Colter County, Florida,LESS the West 100 fat NC The Westerly 80 feet of the S 1/2 of the SE1/4 of the . • 4,To is Tip 50 South,Range 26 Ent,Caller Coadyy,Florida; ' o Parcel 3(25): Gp 1)„ The S 1/2 of the St;1/4 of the SW 1/4• - • r• ,•50 South,Rage . Collar Candy,Florida,LESS the Westerly 80 feet • MID Parcel 4(29x COPY The North 30 feet of that certain tract• • ' . • The N 1/2 of the NW 1/4 ofthe NW '•'j;=••• 23,Towrtthlp 50 _ •- County,Florida,LESS the West 100 feet LESS AND EIaCE'f vet portion contained In •to comer `• -• b omdal Records Book 4336, Page 3681,of the Public Records of Cotler•• , • CltC 6688352v3-121459 Page 3405 • OR 4819 PG 3125 0 EXHIBIT B Permitted Exceptions 1. Real estate taxes and assessments for the year of 2012 and subsequent years which are not yet due and payable; 2. Zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority; 3. Any encroachments and other matters and facts as an accurate survey or personal inspection would disclose; 4. Right of Way Agreement in favor of Florida Power&Light Company, recorded in O.R. Book 850, Page 976; as affected by Access Easements recorded in O.R. Book 3050, page 3433, and O.R. Book 3129, page 2252; Right of Way Consent Agreement, a Memorandum of which was recorded in O.R. Book 3857, page 1047, and Right of Way Consent Agreement, a Memorandum of which was recorded in O.R. Book 4 --► _, - - to Parcel 2(15)and Parcel 1(14)); • 5. Right-of-Way Ag -= 4y;• vor of ,� r& Light Company, recorded in O.R. Book 870, r -.,,: • 3; as affected by _,'r', • Way Consent Agreement of which a = • = du - - -• in O.R. , • : 7, Page 1047(as to Parcel 4(29)). 6. Perpetual e- - C • i-�'i7 T4 • egress recorded in O.R. • Book 882, P-0 - (- o • _ � 9)•1 7. Easement in - a• • Collier County, - f• - • rights-of-way, utilities and drainage reco a. O.R. Book 981, • ', • Parcel 3(25)). 8. Easement in fav• • ��• -r County, , • road rights-of way, utilities and s. drainage recorded in -41-, ,� -`J-—<:r''11. ,Page 294(as to Parcel 1 (14)). 9. Easement in favor of Florida Power & Light Company recorded in O.R. Book 1129, Page 20; as affected by Right-of-Way Consent Agreement of which a Memorandum was recorded in O.R. Book 3857,Page 1047(as to Parcel 2(15)). 10. Non-exclusive easement for ingress and egress, road right-of-way, utilities and drainage recorded in O.R. Book 1156,Page 927(as to Parcel 3(25)). 11. Easements for access and utilities as set forth in Order of Taking recorded in O.R. Book 3910,Page 3745(as to Parcels 1 (14),2(15)and 4(29)). 12. Developer Agreement recorded in O.R. Book 4202, Page 675 (as to Parcels 1 (14)and 2(15)). 13. Conservation Easement in favor of the South Florida Water Management District recorded in Q.R. Book 4351, Page 1191 and Notice of Right of Way Permit recorded in O.R. Book 4439, Page 1831 (as to Parcel 3(25)). 14. Terms, provisions, conditions, covenants, restrictions and easements contained in Entrance Drive Construction and Easement Agreement recorded in O.R. Book • 4474, Page 1232(as to all Parcels). 6688352v3-121459 Page 4 of S *** OR 4819 PG 3126 *** • 15. Conservation Easement in favor of Collier County recorded in O.R. Book 4496, Page 258(as to Parcel 2(15)). 16. Construction of Improvements Cooperation and Easement Agreement recorded in O.R. Book 4524, Page 215 (as to all Parcels), as affected by that certain Amended and Restated Construction of Improvements and Cooperation Agreement recorded simultaneously herewith. 17. Disclosure Notice recorded in O.R.Book 4600,Page 1443(as to Parcel 3(25)). 18. Terms and conditions of Stipulated Final Judgment recorded in O.R. Book 4631, Page 1022(as to Parcels 1 (14),2(15)and 4(29)). 19. Letter of Agreement recorded in O.R. Book 4698,Page 2336(as to all Parcels). 20. Ordinance 75-20(water) recorded in O.R. Book 619, Page 1177 and Ordinance (75-21 (trees)recorded in O.R.Book 619, Page 1182. 21. Collier County Orlin • -• � - ing a Regional Sewer System and providing for imps All recording information refe ,d • •_rtains to the • • 'c records of Collier County, Florida, unless otherwise indi •_ . • wa n (C 1 O II ' tt\ ,0 c c • 66883520-121459 Pia 5 of S IAIEFP HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD EN[i,NEER INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) • PDI-P120160002204 LEGAL DESCRIPTION • • Page 1 of 1 Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary I. Parcel No. 00416720000 Site Adr. 8518 COLLIER BLVD Name/Address WILTON LAND COMPANY LLC 206 DUDLEY RD City WILTON State CT Zip 06897 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 5B14 000100 005 5B14 14 50 26 18.99 14 50 26 S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF SW1/4 LESS R/W,AND WBOFT OF S1/2 OF SE1/4 OF SW1/4, LESS THAT Legal PORTION FOR R/W AS DESC IN OR 4336 PG 3681,AND N3OFT OF N1/2 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF SEC 23-50-26 LESS R/W Millage Area 0 39 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations Sub./Condo 100-ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 10-VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.245 6.258 11.503 Latest Sales History 2015 Certified Tax Roll ill (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date Book-Page Amount Land Value $2,369,768 07/23/12 4819-3122 $3,800,000 (+) Improved Value $0 04/04/06 4010-2370 $0 (_) Market Value $2,369,768 03/21/O6 4002-1563 ;0 09/21/05 3895-868 $ 107,700,000 (') 10%Cap $772,161 09/09/04 3639-2301 $4,600,000 (=) Assessed Value $1,597,607 07/17/02 3074-470 $0 (.) School Taxable Value $2,369,768 04/04/92 1708-1666 $600,000 (=) Taxable Value $ 1,597,607 02/01/90 1503-1555 $0 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll 09/01/89 1468-359 $236,000 09/01/82 987-1691 $90,000 • http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00416720000 8/5/2016 IAI !PENGINER1 ING HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD • INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-P120160002204 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION • • • AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NU ERS(S) `XocaA e-- ��'t95k" (print name),as !"la -� (title, if applicable)of capon Lend Company.LLC (co any, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the(choose one)owner ✓ applicant contract purchaser and that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application;and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Waldrop Engineering.PA. to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v.pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company(L.L.C.) or Limited Company(L.C.), then the documents s' .u/d typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • if the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as th teneral partner"of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". . • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. tog ura 77t.,c - ► 1 --_moi_ ca. _ Signature - 9_ Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoing instrument was sworn to(or affirmed)and subscribed before me on 1111 --X1L.0 (date) by ( _�_.r`L 7 `i'J.tV C tr (name.of person providing oat'i or affirmation), as who is personally known to me or Who has produced (type of identification) as identification. STAMP/SEAL Si atom- wary-Public or Po, Notary Public State ot Florida ti \\ Maritza Aguiar . My Commission FF 075151 Abp Towns 12/0(312017 1111 CP108-COA-001151155 REV 3/24114 WALDROP HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD ENGINEERING INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT(PDI) PDI-PL20160002204 APPROVED COMPLETED ADDRESSING CHECKLIST • • Coiner County • COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD_Addressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Division at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Section at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre-application meeting, please allow 3 days for processinq. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Section. PETITION TYPE(Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) • BL(Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP(Site Development Plan) ❑ BD(Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA(SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI(Insubstantial Change to SDP) El CU(Conditional Use) ❑ SIP(Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP(Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP(Final Plat ❑ SNR(Street Name Change) El LLA(Lot Line Adjustment) El SNC(Street Name Change—Unplatted) ❑ PNC(Project Name Change) ❑ TDR(Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL(Plans& Plat Review) ❑ VA(Variance) ❑ PSP(Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP(Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone 0 VRSFP(Vegetation Removal&Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ(Standard Rezone) E OTHER Insubstantial Change to a PUD(PD1) LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties(copy of lengthy description may be attached) S14 T50 R26 FOLIO(Property ID)NUMBER(s)of above(attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 00416720000 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES(as applicable, if already assigned) 8510 , 8518 Collier Blvd. • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY(copy -needed only for unplatted properties) CURRENT PROJECT NAME(if applicable) Hammock Park CPDD PROPOSED PROJECT NAME(if applicable) n/a PROPOSED STREET NAMES(if applicable) n/a • SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER(for existing projects/sites only) SDP - or AR or PL# 2006 AR 10010 PDI 20140001187 _ e Cot , County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 Project or development names proposed for,or already appearing in,condominium documents(if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Return Approved Checklist By: LJ Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Lindsay Rodriguez Phone: 239-405-7777 Email/Fax: lindsay.rodriguez@waldropengineering.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Division. • FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 00416720000 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: ^— Date: 8/8/2016 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Page 1 of l Collier County Property Appraiser Property Summary • Parcel No. 00416720000 Site Adr. 8518 COLLIER BLVD Name/Address WILTON LAND COMPANY LLC 206 DUDLEY RD City WILTON State CT Zip 06897 Map No. Strap No. Section Township Range Acres *Estimated 51314 000100 005 5814 14 50 26 18.99 14 50 26 S1/2 OF SW1/4 OF SW1/4 LESS R/W,AND W8OFT OF 51/2 OF SE1/4 OF SW1/4, LESS THAT Legal PORTION FOR R/W AS DESC IN OR 4336 PG 3681,AND N3OFT OF N1/2 OF NW1/4 OF NW1/4 OF SEC 23-50-26 LESS R/W Millage Area 0 39 Millage Rates 0 *Calculations Sub./Condo 100-ACREAGE HEADER School Other Total Use Code 0 10-VACANT COMMERCIAL 5.245 6.258 11.503 Latest Sales History 2015 Certified Tax Roll • (Not all Sales are listed due to Confidentiality) (Subject to Change) Date Book-Page Amount Land Value $2,369,768 07/23/12 4819-3122 $3,800,000 (+) Improved Value $0 04/04/06 4010-2370 $0 (=) Market Value $2,369,768 03/21/06 4002-1563 5 0 09/21/05 3895-868 $107,700,000 (-) 10%Cap 5 772,161 09/09/04 3639-2301 $4,600,000 (=) Assessed Value $ 1,597,607 07/17/02 3074-470 $0 (=) School Taxable Value $2,369,768 04/04/92 1708-1666 $600,000 (=) Taxable Value $1,597,607 02/01/90 1503-1555 $0 If all Values shown above equal 0 this parcel was created after the Final Tax Roll 09/01/89 1468-359 $236,000 09/01/82 987-1691 $90,000 • http://www.collierappraiser.com/main_search/Recorddetail.html?Map=No&FolioNum=00416720000 8/5/2016 0 LOCATION MAP HAMMOCK PARK CPDD ;x r c.,-ire—"''►"' ..___ _."'.. I 4 :' t t t � t C: , , H- C112121" I IMP I.. IA i. . _ r- •' ..) . , t• Seouew DA j jr. • ,� y 4 ft ti i , 1►�S .a{ r,.... , i ! , _ ,..,,, ,, , .„.. „ .i. . . .,.., 1 +, �.` f. O• 1' `I Jilt 3 4. "Cu*+" % • ., m ,x�`"P '', »yi - ' ,/ �, . . sm � ,.1 0 WALDROP HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE CPUD ENGINEERING INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PDI) PDI-PL20160002204 LOCATION MAP • • HAMMOCK PARK COMMERCE CENTRE • CPUD INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PUD LOCATION MAP J NORTH 7 141 li - PROJECT 6 -- I LOCATION 1 ----)-_, , El _I' ► 1 :i s K HAMMOCKa..4 Y 4 , _____ ,_.. , r ! __ Q _ r 21 a I2 --._----) \ 22 1\, _ I i t 1 I z -- -- _ 0 714 . \,._ : 7--------- ----/ - i _____ i i"____. ,-,. 1:-. , / 2 26 ---