Loading...
Backup Documents 02/03/1998 RBCC REGU-bAR HI~RTING OF FEBRUARY 3, 1998 Uaples Daily Naples, FI..339~0 Affidavit of Publication Naples 0atty lle~s BOARD OF COUIJTY COMHISSIONERS ATTfI: NAflCY SALOGUB PO BOX A13016 UAPLES FL 34101-3016 REFERENCE: 001230 8(X)4A0 57633975 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEE State of Florida County of Collier Before the under,igned authority, personally appeared B. Lamb, who on oath says that she serves as the Assistant Corporate Secretary of the Naples Daily News, a daily newspaper published at Naples, in Collier County, FLorida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates listed. Affiant further says that the said Naples Daily flews is a newspaper published at Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said Collier County, Florida, each day and has been entered as second class raatl carter at the post office in Naples, in said Collier County, Florida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertise~.nt; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm nr coporatton any discount, rebate, co~missi~ or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. PUBLISHED ~1; 02/01 AD SPACE: 52.000 I~'ICH 0120 NoTIC~ PL~t. IC N~ETING BOARD OF COUNTY COMAAIS~edONER$. C~L~R C~NTY, FL~OA ~d ~ ~ ~' Govwrnmen~ Complex, s~ed fl~ ~~. County Admlnlslravor, ~e ~, ~ ~l. Any ~ ~. ~ ~, ~ r~o~ eyre ~ ~h ~ BOARD g~OUNTY COMMI~O COLLIER COUNTY, BARBARA B. BERRY, ~AIR~N DWIGHT E. 8R~CK, . CLERK ~ cl~ Feb. I ~ I FILE0 ON: 02/02/98 Signature of Affiant ' ~, a Sworn to and Subscribed before me this ~ day of 19 ',' Personalty known by me ,. ., ,. , February 3, 1998 COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA February 3, 1998 9:00 A.M. NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NOT ON THIS AGENDA MUST BE SIIHMITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AT LF2~T 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE M]KETING AND WILL BE IIEARD UNDER "PUBLIC PETITIONS". ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD W-ILL NRRD A RECORD OF T}{E PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING T}{ERETO, AND ~ORE MAY ~ TO J{NSURE THAT A VERBATI~ RECORD OF THE PROCRR~INGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE ALL REGISTERED PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO F/VE (5) MINUTES UNLESS PPLRMISSION FOR A/3DITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY THE CHAIRMAN. ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMi~AIRRD ARE AVAILABLE IN THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. LUNCH RECESS SC~ FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. 1. INVOCATION - Pastor Robert Jacobs - Messiah Lutheran Church 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE o APPROVAL OF AGENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA Approved aud/or Adopted w/changes - 4/0 (Commissioner Constantine Absent) 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approved as Presented - 4/0 (Commissioner Constantine Absent) Note: January 12th should read January 13 A. January 12, 1998 - Regular meeting. 5. PROCLAMATIONS AND SERVICE AWARDS A. PROCLAMATIONS 1) Proclamation proclaiming the week of February 8-14, 1998 as Vocational Education Week. To be accepted by David Baldaia, Ed.D., Director of Career, Technical & Continuing Education for Collier County Public Schools. Adopted - 4/0 (Commissioner Constantine Absent) Page 1 February 3, 1998 B. S F~Tg-I CE AWARDS Presented 1) 2) Tom McDonough - Wastewater Collections - 10 years Bob Angeline - Road & Bridge - 5 years C. PRESENTATIONS 6. APPROVAL OF CLERK'S REPORT A. ANALYSIS OF CHANGES TO RESERVES FOR CONTINGENCIES. 7. PUBLIC PETITIONS A. Victor A. Vald~s regarding the use of a trailer in Immokalee. Staff directed to handle the matter - 5/0 B. Jill Burzynski, Chairman of the Legal Aid Society Committee regarding a proposal for the creation of a Legal Aid Society. To be placed on future agenda - 5/0 C o Matt Crowder regarding the Capri Fire District and the East Naples Fire Department. To be discussed at the February 17th meeting 8. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL 1) Community Development and Environmental Services Divisi6n staff report on commercial vehicle and commercial equipment- sections of the Land Development Code. (Continued from the meeting of 1/20/98) Approved - 5/0 2) Interlocal Agreement between Collier County and the City of Marco Island for the County Planning Services Department staff to provide planning services to the Marco Island Planning Board and Marco City Council. Approved - 5/0 B. PUBLIC ¥~RKS 1) Adopt a Resolution authorizing the acquisition by gift, purchase, or condemnation of fee simple title interests and/or perpetual, non-exclusive, road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage, maintenance and temporary construction interests by easement for the construction of the four-laning improvements for Livingston Road between Golden Gate Parkway (C.R. 886) and Radio Road, CIE No. 053; and repealing Resolution No. 97-359. Page 2 Res. 98-29 - Adopted 5/0 February 3, 1998 2) Adopt a Resolution authorizing the acquisition by gift,. purchase or condemnation of temporary construction easements for the construction of raw water wells required to complete the North Collier Regional Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project. Res. 98-30/CWS-98-1 - Adopted 5/0 Moved from Item 116B5 3) Consider a County Arterial Roadway Landscape Improvement Funding Partnership with the Golden Gate Beautification MSTU for CR 951 (Staff's Request). Approved - 5/0 C. PUBLIC SERVICES D. SUPPORT SERVICES Moved from Item t16D2 i) Selection of the Newspaper for the advertising of delinquent real estate and personal property taxes. (Commissioner Constantine) Continued for 1 week to allow staff to consider alternatives available - 5/0 E. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR F. AIRPORT AUTHORITY 9. COUNTY A~ORNEY,S REPORT 10. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER~ A. Appointment of member to the Collier County Planning Commission. Res. 98-31 Appointing Karen Urbanik - Adopted 5/0 B. Appoinzment of member to the Immokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency. Res. 98-32 Appointing Sgt. Robert Asbel, Jr. - Adopted 5/0 C. Appointment of CoI~nissioner to serve on County Government Productivity Committee. Res. 98-33 Appointing Commissioner Mac'Kie - Adopted 5/0 11. OTHER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICER~ PUBLIC COMMENT ON GENERAL TOPICS Kenneth W. Thompson re Sheriff's Office Albert Luckerbauer re proposed East Naples Fire Control District providing service for the Isles of Capri. Page 3 February 3, 1998 PUBLIC HEARINGS WIrJ. BE }[EARD IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING STAFF ITEMS 12. AI]VERTIS~ PUBLIC HEARINGS - BCC A. COMPREHENS/VE PLAN AMRNII~ENTS B. ZONING AKEN~MENTS 1) Community Development and Environmental Services Division requesting an amendment to the Ford Motor Company Vehicle Evaluation Center PUD, Ordinance No. 84-8, for the purpose of authorizing non-passenger vehicle testing, specifically referencing a communication tower as a permitted use and eliminating specific road improvement stipulations. Ord. 98-9 Adopted - 5/0 13. BOARD OF ZONING APPEAL.q A. AIA;ERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGs 14. STAFF'S COMMUNICATION~ 15. BOARD OF COUNTY COM)flSSIONERS, COMMUNICATIONR A. Request for the County Attorney to provide report re Clerk and payment of Court Administrator's bills. B. Rocks on the beach Staff directed to draft policy re public speakers at the BCC Meetings. D. Commenss re Board action relative to the Ford Test Track. E. LDC Public Hearings to be held on 6/10 and 6/24/98 at 5:05 Pi.M. F. Discussion re upcoming BCC vacation schedule and request for Commissioners to review their calendars for upcoming scheduling. 16. CONSENT AGENDA - Ail matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one motion without separate discussion of each item. If discussion is desired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately.. Approved and/or Adopted w/changes - 5/0 Page 4 February 3, 1998 A. COMMUNITY DEVEIX)PMENT & ENVIRONMEI~TAL S[~/ICES Added: 1) Approval of an access easement to Golden Gate Congregation of Jehovah's Witnesses, Inc., a Florida Non-Profit Corporation, to utilize the County owned Max Hasse, Jr. Community Park entrance road to provide for a common driveway to serve the heuse of worship. 2) Labelle Longhorn Booster Club Carnival Permit (Commissioner Berry) Carnival Permit 98-2 B. PUBLIC WORKS 1) This item has been deleted. 2) Approve a Cooperative Agreement with the South Florida Water Management District for the removal and replacement of bridges on the Cocohatchee Canal. 3) Recommendation to award Bid #97-2762 for Pump and Motor Repair. Awarded to Horvath Electric Motors in the estimated amount of $100,000.00 4) Approve the purchase of Tract 6, Unit 29, Golden Gate '~ Estates for Roadway Project 60061, Livingston Road. (CIE No. 53) In the amount of $130,010.50 Item 116B5 - Moved to Item t8B3: 6) Approve Amendment No. One to Work Order HMA-FT96-7 with Hole :~ontes & Associates, Inc., for the Manatee Road 1.5-MGD Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project. In the amount of $49,700.00 C. PUBLIC SERVICES 1) Authorization to negotiate an extension of the current concession agreement with the Registry Resort of Naples, Inc. Staff to negotiate w/Florida Panthers Holdings, Inc. 2) Recommendation to authorize the Chair to sign electronic subscription agreement to enable Library to subscribe to 'Books In Print". w/R.R, l~owker in the amount of $3,850.00 Der year. 3) Grant of easement to Florida Power & Light Company upon real property owned by the Board of County Commissioners of Page 5 February 3, 1998 Collier County, Florida. Staff to prepare an amendment to lease between Collier County and Primeco Personal Communications, L.P. (PSC) D. SUPPORT S ER~-ICES 1) Approval of Purchase of Dehumidification Equipment for the Remaining Four Floors of the Administration Building and the Immokalee Courthouse. Competitive Bid process waived; Staff to enter into an agreement with CTSI Corporation in the amount of $82,522.00 Item t16D2 - Moved to Item 1SD1 E. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 1) Line item transfer request from Gulf Bay Marine Management Inc. for Tarpon Fishing Tournament, Tourist Development Funds Special Events. ' As outlined in the Executive 2) Budget amendment report. BA's 98-116, 98-117 and 98-118 F. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER~ G. MI SCELLANF~)US CORRES PONDENC~. 1) MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS DIRECTED H. OT}{ER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS I. COUNTY ATTORNEY 1) RecommendaT. ion to approve a Legal Services Agreement with Goodlette, Coleman & Johnson, p. A. by and through Michael W. Petti[ as legal counsel to represent the County on matters relating to the cases as identified in the Legal Services Agreement. 2) Recommendation to accept settlement proposal in Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court case of Kitchens v. Collier County, Case No. 95-4852-CA-01. As outlined in the Executive Summ~ry. J. AIRPORT AUTHORITY 17. ADJOURN Page 6 February 3, 1998 INQUIRIES CONCERNING CHANGES TO THE BOARD'S AGENDA SHOULD BE ~D~ TO THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR'S OFFICE AT 774-8383. Page 7 AGENDA C,71ANGF~¥ BOARD OF CY)UNTY (,Y)MMIS.¥IONER,~;' MEETING FI:'BRUARY 3, 1998 ADD: ITEM 16(A)(2)- LABELLE LONGIIORN BOOSTER CLUB CARNIVAL PERMIT (COMMISSIONER BERRY). MOVE: ITEM 16(B)(5) TO 8(B)(3) - CONSIDER A COUNTY ARTERIAL ROADWAY LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENT FUNDING PARTNERSIIIP WITil TIlE GOLDEN GATE BEAUTIFICATION MSTll FOR CR 951 (STAFF'S REQIIEST). MOVE: ITEM 16(D)(2) TO 8(D)(I) - SELECTION OF TIlE NEWSPAPER FOR TIlE ADVERTISING OF DELINQUENT REAl, ESTATE AND PERSONAl, PROPERTY TAXES. (COMMISSIONER CONSTANTINI.;}. NOTE: CORRECT RECORD TO READ APPROVAL OF JANUARY 13TM MINUTES. 5 A 1' PROCLAMATION WtlEREAS, February 8-! 4, ! 998, has been designated Vocational Education Week by the American Vocational Association; and IFtlEREAS, profound economic and technological changes in our society are being rapidly reflected itl the structure and nature of,york, causing a gradual sh~ft in the job market toward more technically trained employees who are equipped wHh good reading, writing, math, problem solving, and critical thinking skill; and tVHEREAS, many of the fastest-growing occupations in Florida for the year 2005 will be in .fields requiring vocational or occupational training leading to a certificate; and WItEREAS, Collier County is making efforts to diversify its economic base beyond agriculture and tourism and to help the establishment of technology-related companies that t~fer high-paid employment; and tVttEREA& Collier County Public Schools provide vocational technical programs in high schools and the Walker Institute of Technology that train students in basic and technical skills that prepare them to meet new demands of business and industry; and WHEREAS, the ever-Increasing cooperative efforts of vocation educators, business and industry stimulate the growth and vitality o four local economy and that of the entire nation by preparing workers for the occupations forecasted to experience the largest and fastest growth in the next decade. NOW THEREFORE, be it proclaimed by the Board of County Commissioners of Coilier County, Florida. that the week of February 8-14, 1998 be designated as VOCATIONAL EDUCATION WEEK During this week we urge all citizens to reflect the outstanding programs and ~ervlces by vocational educators in the county and the vital role that vocational education plays in educating the local work force. We further urge business and industry to continue supporting these excellent vocational technical programs in order to enhance individual work skills and business productivity. DONE AND ORDERED THIS 3'~ Day of February, 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BROCk, CLERr RESOI.UTiON NO. 98- 29 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TIlE ACQUISITION OF I.AND BY GIFT, PURCHASE OR CONDEMNATION OE FEE SIMPLE TITLE INTERESTS ..\ND OR PERPETUAL, NON-EXCI. USIVF., ROAD RI(JIlT-OF-WAY, SIDEWALK. SLOPE. UTILITY. DRAINAGE. MAINTENANCE AND TE.\IPORARY CONSTRUCTION INTERESTS BY EASEMENT FOR TIlE CONSTR['CTION OF TIlE FOUR-LANING ROADWAY IMPROVEMI'~NTS FOR LIVINGSTON ROAD PROJECT BETWEEN GOLDEN GATE PARKWAYI('.R. 88¢0 AND RADIO ROAD ((_'.R. 85¢0, CIE NO. 053; AND REI~F. ALIN(i RESOI.UTION 97-359. WIt ER EAS. thc Board of ('ounty Commissioners. on October 28. 1997. adopted Ordinance No. 97-55 therein establishing Ibc I t]97 {Seventh Annual) Capital Improvement Element of Ihc Growth Management Plan in order to establish priorilics for thc design, acquisilion and construction of the various capital improvement projects. Thc Transpo~alion Element of thc County's Comprehensive Plan was ~ldopled m Ordinance No. 97-62; and WItEREAS. thc four-hming improvements to Livingston Road bern'CCh Golden Gate Parkway alld Radio Road is one orthe capital improvement projects required under the Transportation Element of the Cotmly's Comprehensive Phm; and WI IEREAS, the Board of County ('ommissioners. on October 8. 1996, adoplcd Rcsolulion No. 96-457 at~thori/ing thc ('otmtv Slafl'lo acquire by gill or purchase certain cascmcnls, and/or Ibc simple title to thc property and propc~y interests required and necessary lbr thc four-hming roadway improvcntcnts of Livingston Road hclwccn Golden Gate Parkway and Radio Road; and WI IEREAS, thc location for construclion of thc proposed improvements has been fixed by sum'er and is collectively represented by the legal descriptions comprising Exhibit "A" atlached hereto and mco~oratcd herein. WtlEREAS. after consideration of thc availability of alternate routes and locations, thc comparative costs of project alternatives, various impacts upon thc cnvironmcnl, long range planning options, and public salkty considerations, the Board desires to exercise its righl lo condemn pmpe~y for public pu~oscs. NOW. THEREFORE, BI~ IT RESOLVED BY Tile BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COI.I.IER COl INTY. FI.ORIDA, thai il has been determined by Iht Board that thc construction of thc tbur-laning roadway improvements for I.ivingston Road between Golden Gate Parkway arid Radio Road, (hereinafter referred to as "thc Pr~iect"} is necessary and in thc public's best intcrcst in order to protect thc health, salktv and wcllhrc of the citizens of ('oilier Comity. AND I1 IS FURTI IER RES()I.VED that constmclion of thc Project is pa~ oflJ)c ('ounly's long range planning cffo~, and is included in the Transpo~ation Element ol'lhc ('ountv's Comprehensive Plan for Growth Management, as approved by the Florida Department of Community Affairs. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the County Staff has reviewed alternative locations for the project, various impacts to the environment, public safety and welfare considerations associated with the design and conslruction of thc Project, and Ihc cosls associated with the design. properly rights acquisition, and construction of thc Project; and [he Board finds that after consideration of these issues, the most feasible location for construction of the proposed improvements is collectively represented by the legal descriptions comprising Exhibit "A' attached hereto and incorporated herein. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that in order to construct thc Project as designed, it is necessary for thc Board to acquire thc various rca] properly interests described in Exhibit "A" lo wit: fee simple title; perpetual, non-exclusive road right-of-way, sidewalk, slope, utility, drainage, maintenance and temporary construction interests by easement. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that all property, whether encumbered by easement or acquired in fee simple, shall be put to public purposes. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the County staff is hereby authorized to immediately acquire by gift, purchase or condemnation in accordance with the provisions of Chapters 73, 74 and 127, Florida Statutes, the above-referenced real property interests more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that no mobile homes are located on thc property sought to be acquired and therefore it will not be necessary to remove any mobile homes from the properly to be acquired. This Resolution repeals and supersedes Resolution No. 97-359 in its entirety. This Resolution adopted on this ~Z~ day of ~~ , 1998, after motion, second and majority vote. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Heidi F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Ba'~bara n. Berry,'~HA~R'I~AN EXHIBIT 8 B-1 3301 OFFICE 0£ CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA (941) 774-8192 34112 PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. TAX PARCEL NO. 27 LEGAL road DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVl;2F) right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement COMMENCING AT TILL" SOUTI IWEST CORNER OF LOT I, OF TIlE PLAT THEREOF, COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK PHASE I-A, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13 PAGES 55 AND 56 OF TIlE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA SAID POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ALSO BEING TIlE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF RADIO ROAD (CR.858) AND TIlE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD; TllENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES I0 MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST RIGIIT OF WAY LINE OF COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD. A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET TO TIlE POINT OF BEGINNING; TItENCE CON-I'INUING NORTH ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 19 MINUTES I I SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 7O. lO FEET; 'DIENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES I i MINUTES 10 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING o.029 ACRE (!,250 SQUARE FEET). MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS 'TIIE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD BEING NORTH O0 DEGREES Il) MINUTES 28 SECONDS EAST. PARCEL DATE: F-XHII~-']_ 881 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 5501 EAST TAIvlIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 54112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION LOT 2  N.89'13'38"E. 249.58' 30' DRA NAGE EASEMENT---, ' ~ /--16' SIDEWALK & ~\ ~U~UT¥ EASEMENT ' I I§ d°~, /- S.45'19'11"E. I ~b / 7o.~o' I I o. ,/ /-'N. 89'11 '1.0,"E. i I z ~ / .fPARCEL 101 / 179'42LPARCIFL 501 50 00'- ~ /'14.01' / /;PARCEL 601 I , P ~ B.-,. ~ ~/ / / / I '1 ~ 214.41' / .t, / J~ 1,~' PREVIOUSLY DEDICATED-/ s.8g'11'10"W. 214.40' / P.O.C.-/ (S.W. COR. LOT 1) RADIO ROAD CR-858 GENERAL NOTES t) P.D,C. indicates Point oF Commencement 2) P,0,~3, indicates Point oF ]3eginning 3) Sec. Indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge. indicates Range , 6) R/W indicates Right-oF-way 7) A[t distances are in Feet and decimals thereof [3) ]]asis oF ]3earing is the North Right oF Way line oF Radio Road being S.89'1]']0'W. 9) Not valid unless signed Qnd sealed with the emloossed se~l oF the professional land surveyor PARCEL NO. 101 Tills IS ONLY A SKETCH T. TEl ??-!4-q7 ~D__I ¢)~ SHEET 2 OF 2 OFFICE OF CAPITAL 5501 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL (941) PROJECTS NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 774-8192 LEGAL D6SCRIpTION (NOT A SURVI~Y) slope and maintenance easement COMMENCING AT TIlE SOUTIIEAST CORNER OF LOT I OF TIlE PLAT TIIEREOF, COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK PllASE I-A. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13 PAGES 55 AND 56 OF TIlE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST ALONG TIlE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT I, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO TIlE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOtFFH 89 DEGREES l I MINUTES l0 SECONDS WEST ALONG A LINE LYING 20 FEET NORTH, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO,SAID SOUTtt LINE OF SAID LOT I. A DISTANCE OF 169.42 FEET: THENCE NORTH 45 DEGREES 19 MINUTES II SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 14.1)1 FEET: TI IENCE NORTII g9 DEGREES II MINUTES I0 SECONDS EAST ALONG A LINE LYING 30 FEET NORTH, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO, SAID SOUTll LINE OF LOT I, A DISTANCE OF 179.42 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 13 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF I0.00 FEET TO TIlE POINT OF BEGINNING: SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 0.040 ACRE (1744 SQUARE FEET, MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE EAST LINE OF LO2' I BEING NORTtl DEGREES 13 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST. PARCEL 501 $; PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX EXHIBIT 881 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3501 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION I LOT 2 ~ 30' DRAINAGE EASEMENT--~,I ,-~\ ~....~!] ,~\~UTILITY EASEMENT LOT1 50.O0'-x 15.00'~ I S.45'lg'11"E. 49.07' / PARCEL 501 -/ . --'N.8g'11'10"E. / -169 42' ~ /-14' 01~/<~ 179 42' ./ / ' ~. // // T >.-164.417 / , . / . , 214.41 / ~-15 PRE~OUSLY DEDICATED-/ S.89'11'10"W. 214.40' RADIO ROAD ~_ CR-858 ..~1o. oo' P.O.B. ~-5.00' It~5 ~ DRAWN BT: GENERAL NOTES ]) P,F1, C. indicates Point oF Comnencement c~) P,O,B. indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec, indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township .5) Rge. indica~ces 8) R/W indicates Righ~c-oF-way 7) All distances are In ?eet and decinals thereof B) Basis o? Bearing is the North Ricjh~ oF Way line oF R~dio Road being 9) No~ vaUd unless signed and sealed with the embossed seal o? the professional land surveyor PARCEL NO. 101 THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH CHECKi:O BT: SCALE: DATE: Fill' NO.: NOT TO SCALE 11-14-97 PR-50! I SHEET 2 OF 2 EXHIBIT OFFICE OF CAPITAL (941) 8 8 ! PROJECTS NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 774-8192 PROJECT NO. ~,e ~ I PROJECT PARCEL NO. ~ o ~ TAX PARCEL NO. 27IqH')(),'.00()7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) .~ide~a]k and maintenance ~,a.~emE, nt COMMENCING AT TIlE SOUTIIEAST CORNER OF LOT ! OF Tilt: PLAT TIIEPJZOF, COLLIER COUNT':' PRODUCFION PARK PItASE I-A AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 13 PAGES 55 AND 56 OF TIlE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUN"TY .FLORIDA. TtIENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 13 MINb"FES o5 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID LOT I. A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET TO TIlE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOb'TH 89 DEGREES I 1 MINE"I'ES 10 SECONDS WEST ALONG A LINE LYING 15 FEET NORTH. AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO, TIlE SOUTtl LINE OF SAID LOT I. A DISTANCE OF 164 41 FEET, TIIENCE NORTII 45 DEGREES 19 MINUTES I I SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF ?.01 FEET; TIIENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES I I MINU'TES I0 SECONDS EAST ALONG A LINE LYING 20 FEET NORTH,AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO, SAID SOLO'ti LINE OF LOT 1, A DISTANCE OF 169.42 FEET; TtlENCE SOUTH oo DEGREES 13 MINUTES 05 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 5.¢Y0 FEET TO TllE POIN'F OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CO,'~fTAINING 0,019 ACRE (g34 SQUARE FEE'[ ). MORE OR LESS BASIS OF BEARINGS IS FHE EAST LINE OF LOl' I BEING NORTH 1~ DEGREES 13 MINUTES 05 SECONDS EAST. PARCEL 601 .,, EXHIBIT J OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA ,34112 (94-1) 774-8192 8 B 1 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION LOT 2 X \ so O"A,NAOE EASEME, T \ \ /-'16' SIDEWALK &: ¢,\ /,V u'rILITY EASEMENT '~,, ¢.S,\ LOT 1 'o~ 50.00'-~ 15.00'- ~ /-- S.45'19'11 "E. I / 70.10' 1/ f-N.Sg', ~- PARCEL 101 / 179 42 1 ~ / , / ' rPARCEL 501 164.41'--~--~ / .t /15' PREVIOUSLY DEDICATED S.89'11'10"W. 214.40' f RADIO ROAD CR-858  10.00° 5.00' GENERAL NDTES 1) P.B.C. indicates Point oF Commencement 2) P.D.B. indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicc~tes Township 5) Rge. indicates Range 6) R/W Indicates Right-oF-way 7) Att distances are In Feet and decimals thereof B) Basis oF Bearing is the North Right oF Way tine oF Radio Road being S.89'11'I0'W. 9) Not valid unless signed and sealed' with the embossed seal oF the pr'oFessionat land sur'veyor PARCEL NO. 101 THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH L,M.R. SHEET 2 OF 2 ,; 881, OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAIJIAIJI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA (,813) ??'1-8192 33962 PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL TAX PARCEL NO.. SKETCH OF road I.EGAL DESCRIPTION. N(_~_0_T__A SURVEY) right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage and LEGAL DESCRIPTION maintenance easement Parcel 102A A portion of Tract "A", oFthe plat thereof, BRIARWOOD PLAZA, as recorded in Plat Book 17, Pages :24 and :25 oFlhe Public Records of Collier County, Florida and being more particularly described as Follows; BEGIN at the Southwest Corner of said Tract "A', said POINT OF BEGINNING lying at the point of'intersection oFthc North Right of'Way line of Radio Road (CR 856) and the East Right of Linc of Livingston Road (CR 881); thence run along said East Right of Way linc of Livingston Road N 00° 16' 57" E 60.07 feet; the leaving said East Right of Line S 49° 20' 41" E 58.78 feet to a point lying Twenty (20') Feet North, as measured perpendicular to, said North Right of Way line of Radio Road; thence parallel with said North Right of Way linc N 87° 46' 06" E 376.99 feet; thence S 74" 43' 24" E 66.49 reel to said North Right of Way line of Radio Road; thence along said North Right Line S 87° 46' 06" W 486.11 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 9978 square feet more or less. Basis of Bearings is the West line of aforesaid Tract "A" being N 00° 16' 57" E. Sheet 1 of 2 SCALE:_ DRAWN BY:_ CHECKED BY' FILE NO. ' REVISEOi-' DPAWN /1¥: CHECKED SCALE: DAlE OR'OFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR /'/2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX E TAMIAMI TF~AI ;962 SHEET OF B OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION PARCLrLIO2A GENERAL NOTES ]) P.O.C, indicates Point oF Commencement 2) P.E].3. indlcotes Point oF Reginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp, ]ndic:ate~ Township 5) Rge, indicates Range 6) R/~ indicates Right-oF-way 7) All distances a~e in Feet and decimals thereof 8) ~asis oF ~eanings is the ~es~ line being 9) No~ valid unless signed and seated with the enbossed sea~ oF the p~oFessiona[ land su~veyon THIS IS ONLY A SK~CH NDT TD Ir~ ~.: SCAI_E 09-16-96 LRBR]O6A SHEET 2 OF 2 8 B-l: LEGAL 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO, ~ (~)~ PROJECT PARCEL NO. TAX PARCEL NO. 247550025Q4 DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) .slope, utility and mnintenanc(, easement A PORTION OF TRACT "A" OF TIlE PLAT THEREOF.BRIARWOOD PLAZA. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 17, PAGES 24 AND 25 OF TIlE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS. COMMENCING AT TilE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT "A" SAID I~)INT OF COMMENCE MENT ALSO LYING AT TI IE POI NT OF INTERSECTION OF TIlE NORTtl RIGIIT OF WAY LINE OF IL&BIO ROAD (C R.856) AND TIlE EAST RIGttT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD (C.R. 881), THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID EAST RIGIIT OF WAY LINE. A DISTANCE OF 60.07 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH ALONG SAID LINE. A DISTANCE OF 849.91 FEET; TilENCE LEAVING SAID EAST RIGIIT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF' I0.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST ALONG A LINE LYING I0 FEET EAST. AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO. SAID EAST RIGIlT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD DISTANCE OF 858.41 FEET. TIIENCE NORTII 49 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 4 ~ SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 13.13 FEET TO TIlE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING o. 196 ACRE (8.542 SQU&RE FEET). MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD BEING NORTH ¢~ DEGREES, 16 MINUTES, 57 SECONDS EAST PARCEL 902OT y.. ! / .., PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 8 B 1 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA ,.34112 (941) 774.-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION PARCEL I02B z PI3 17/ PG 24 8~02 TRACT A 13.15' ~ I~ADIO ROAD , ~ L__ P.O.C. SECllON CORNER j GENERAL NDTES 1) P,O,C. Indicates Point oF Commencement 2) P.D.B. indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp. [ndicates Township 5) Rge, indicates Range 6) R/W Indicates Right-oF-way 7) AlE distances ore In Feet and decimals thereof 8) Basis oF Bearings Is the West line oF Tract 'A' being N.O0' I6'57'E. 9) Not valid unless signed and sea[ed with the embossed seal oF the professional land surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SK~CH ~ M D ~ NOT TO ........... 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (94-1) 774--8192 _LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVE~Y) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, PROJECT NO, ~ 00~¢, I PROJECT PARCEL NO. ~0 ~ TAX PARCEL NO. 2?lfi~nnn~na drainage & maintenance easement COMMENCING AT TI IE SOUTI lEAST CORNER OF SECTION 36 TOWNSHIP 49 S[OUTI! RANGE 25 EAST COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 16 MINUTES .';7 SECONDS EAST ALONG 'FILE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36, A DISTANCE OF 66.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING SAID POINT OF BEGINNING ALSO BEING 'Fl IE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF TRACT 'A' OF THE PLAT THEREOF COLLrER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK PHASE 3-A AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 22 PAGES 59 & 6o OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AND TIlE EASY RIGIFF OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD; THENCE NORTH gl DEGREES I0 MINUTES 54 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 50 53 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A ' ' NON-TANGENT CURVE. CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH. HAVING A RADIUS OF 14876 71 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 DEGREES 04 INUTES 38 SECONDS. AND A CtIORD OF 20.04 FEET BEARING SOUTH 88 DEGREES MINUTES o9 SECONDS WEST; THENCE WEST ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 20.04 FEET[ THENCE NORTH 44 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 56 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 71.40 FEET: THENCE NORTtl 0 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 53.[08 FEET: THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 37 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 2o00 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST ALONG AFORESAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD A DISTANCE OF 592.30 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 0.301 ACRE (13,130 SQUARE FEET), MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS TIlE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 BEING SOUTH 00 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST. PARCEL I03 b~JJ¢~:;~_ I~. RICHMOND- DATE: /~ I~$~:)FESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR 1~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 3301 E TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 3.3962 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 Curve number ! Radius = 14,B76.73' ~ = 00'04'38' Arc: = 20.04' Chord = 20.04' Chord Brg. S.88'33'09'w. P~RCEL 103 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK PHASE l-B, PB 15, PAGES 7 & 8 LOT 25 LOT 26 LOT 27 COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARS PHASE 3-A, PB 22. PAOES 59 & 60 TRACT A L N.44'43'56"E.--% 71.40' "% R,,',D[O ROAD'(R/W VARIES) GENERAL NOTES I) P.fiJ.C. indicates Point of Commencement 2) P.O.B. indicotes Point of Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge. indicates Rnnge 6) R/W indicates Right-of-way 7) All distances are in Feet and decimals thereo¢' 8) ]]OSiS OF beorinejs is the East lime of Section 36 bein9 S.O0'IG'57'W. 9) Not valid unless signed and sealed with the embossed seai of' +he profPqsinnol Innd surveyor CHECKED BY: THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH SCULl: I'~,T [: FILl: NO.: NDT TD SCALE 12-18-96 PR-IO3A 5'37"E. 20.00' line of Section 3C c,i . · 0 ~ o o u~ Z 0 Z --J ~--N.81'10'54"W. 50.53' ~-P 0 ]~ 66.15' _ __ 49s ~ [S'p.D,C, S~2 OF 2 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL P. ROJ£CTS' 'EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34-112 (94.1) 77'1--8192 PROJECT NO._ ~,(DO~ ! PROJECT PARCEL NO,_ 7~ TAX PARCEL NO.--~?IRqOO05Q4 "temporary construction easement COMMENCING A.{Y~r3 rE SOUTI rEAST CORNER OF SECTION 36 TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES I~ MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINTZ OF SAID SECTION 36 A DISTANCE OF 47S.24 FEET; THENCE NORTH S9 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WE. ST, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO TIlE EAST LIVINGSTON ROAD AND TI rE RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF POINT OF BEGINNING; TI~NCE CONTINUTNG NORTH 0 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 58.fh3 FEET; THENCE LEAVTNG SAID EAST RIGIIT OF WAY LINE NORTH SECONDS WE. ST, A DISTANCE OF R9 DEGREES 43 NfiN'CTES 03 .lr).f)0 FEET; TIrENCE SOLrT~[ 46 DEGREES 13 MINUTES IR SECONDS WE. ST, A DISTANCE OF 2 !.$7 FEET; T;{ENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 2R.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 45 DEGREES 39 MINUTES :24 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 21.57 FEET; TI-~ENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 43 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAII) DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 0.055 ACRE t'2,4f)7 SQUARE FEET), MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS T~rE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 BEING NOR771 of~ DEGREES 16 MINUTIS'.S 57 SECONDS EAST. PARCEL 703 ..., C~-' .~, ./ ~/ " nv:_ ×..---//~/,~2;~. ~ .., J~E R~ RICHMONd' ' _DATD_ ROFESSIONAL ~ND SURV~OR ~/2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJE~S COLLIER COUN~ GOVERNMENT COMPL~ 3301 E TAMIAUl TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 33962 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 5301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK PHASE l-B, PB 15. PAGES 7 & 8 LOT 25 LOT 26 LOT 27 COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK PHASE 3-A. PB 22. PACES 59 & N.89'4,3'O3"W, 30,00' S.46'13'1~ 21,87' PARCEL 903 S. 00'16' 28.00' ~ S.45'39'24"E. 21.57' S.89'43'03" 30.00' S.89'43'03"E. TRACT A 20.00' PARCEL 1 15'37"E, 20.00' line of Section 3C P,D.:B. 0 ,n 0 · '- 0 o o Z RADIO ROAD (R/W VARIES) GENERAL NDT[S 1) P.D.C. indiceS:es Point oF Commencement 2) P,O.P,. indic:.otes Point oF l]eoinninO 3) Sec. i~dicnte~ Section ' 4) Twp. Indicntes Township ~) ~ge. i~rlicnto~ ~nnoe 6) R/~ indicates Rioht-oF_w~y 7) Att distences ore in Feet end decimnls thereof 8) ~esis oF bearings is the [est line oF Section 36 being S.00'16'57'g. 9) Not v~lid unless signed nnd sealed with the embossed se~l oF t~e ProFessionnl I~nd surveyor 36 3.~]__TWP. 49S ' ["~'P,FI,C. THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH CHECKED BY: SC~.L[: DATE: IfiL[ NO.: NOT TD SCALE ni-1(,-97 PR-703 S~2 OF2 LEGAL road 8 B-1 5301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA ,34112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO. ~:~ O0 ~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. /~,4 - ~ TAX PARCEL NO. 771 ",:,nnl 5[lf) DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEy) right-of-way, sid(~'alk, utilily, dr;linage & maintenance easement BEGIN AT TttE NORTtIEAST CORNER OF LOT 27. OF TIlE PLAT TIIEREOF. COI,I,IER COUN'FY PRODUCTION PAItK I'IIASE III. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK PAGES ? & g OF TIlE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLI,IER COUNTY. FLORIDA. SAID POINT OF BEGINNING BEING 'FI IE POINT OF INTERSEC'I'ION OF TIlE WEST RIGIrF OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND TIlE SOUTII RIGIIT OF WAY LINE OF MARKET AVENUE, TIIENCE sou'rll o DEGREES 16 MINUTES $7 SECONDS WES'r ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD. A DISTANCE OF 186.39 FEET; TIIENCE SOUTII 89 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 37 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; TIIENCE NORTtl 0 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 57 SECONDS EAST ALONG A LINE LYING TEN (10'} FEET WEST, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO. SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE. A DISTANCE OF 151.39 FEET; THENCE NORTtt 48 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 07 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 5220 FEET TO SAID $OUTtl RIGIIT OF WAY LINE OF MARKET AVENUE; TIIENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 20 M/NLFFES 33 SECONDS EAST ALONG SAID SOUTII RIGItT OF WAY LINE. A DISTANCE OF 49.29 FEET TO TIlE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 0.59 ACRE 12.551 SQUARE FEETX MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS TIlE WEST RIGIIT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD BEING SOUTIt O0 DEGREES Iff MINUTES 57 SECONDS WEST PARCEL I04OT ! . OF SS,O OFFICE OF' CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUN~ GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 8 B"I OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3.301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 54112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION PARCEL 104 MARKET AVENUE 60' R/W 173.87' N.48'32'O7"W. 52.20' COLLIER COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK PHASE l-B, PB 15, PAGES 7 & 8 LOT 27 173.87' TRACT A COLLI[R COUNTY PRODUCTION PARK PHASE 3-A, PB 22, PAGES 59 & 60 b P.B.B. '20'53"E. 49.29' line of Section 3C <C 0 Z 0 Z S.89'15'37"W. 10.00' L.M.R. GENERAL NBTES I) P.B.C. Indicates Point oF Commencement 2) P,D.3, indicates Point; oF ]3eoinning 3) Sec, indicates Section 4) Twp, Indicates Township 5) Ese. indicates Range 6) R/W Indicates Right-oF-way 7) Att distances ar'e tn Feet and decimals thereof 8) ]3asis oF bearings is the West R/W tine oF Livingston Road being S.00'16'57'W. 9) Not valid unless signed and seated with the embossed seat oF the professional land surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH SCALE ll-E]l-97 PR-104BT SHEET 2 OF 2 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA (941) 774-8192 34112 PROJECT NO. ~1 PROJECT PARCEL NO. [05 TAX PARCEL NO. ??lqqnnl~n? LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 105 A portion of'Lot 28 &the Plat there&Collier County Production Park Phase 1-B as recorded in Plat Book 15, Pages ? and 8 &the Public Records of'Collier County, and being more particularly described as follows; BEGIN at the Southeast Corner &said Lot 28, said Point of Beginning lying on the point of' Intersection of the West Right of Way line of Livingston Road and the North Right of Way line at Market Avenue, thence along said North Right of Way line of Market Avenue S 89° 20' 33" W 50.,30 feet; thence leaving said North Right of Way line N 38° 34' 21" E 64.54; thence N 00© 16' 57" E 70.00 feet;thence N 89° 20' 33" E I0.0 feet to said West Right of Way line of Livingslon Road; thence along said west Right of Way line S 00° 16' 57" W 120.00 feet to the POINT O1v BEGINNING. Containing 2200 square feet more or less Basis o£ Bearings is the west Right of Way line of Livingston Road being S 00° 16' 57" W. Sheet I of 2 pag bob Ighlc~.n'ip. O6r) OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 3301 E TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 33962 8 8 105 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION Ca N.89'20'33"E, 200.00' Q:::: J I /--10' SIDEWALK > I W F UTILITY EASEMENT ._1 0 0 ~ N.38'34'21"E.-x (,D 64.54' 0 ,',- / c-1 ~ ~o.o0' / S.89'20'33"W. 174.58' / 10.O0' I g 50,00' Curve number l Radius : 25,00' ZS = 89'02'52' Arc = 35.06' MARKET AVENUE 60' R/W PARCEL NO. 105 GENERAL NOTES I) P.O.C, indicates Point aP Commencement 2) P,O.B, indicates Point oF' Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp. [ndicates Township 5) Pge, indicates Range 6) R/W indicates Right-oF-way 7) Alt diste,qces ore in Feet and decimals thereof 8) Basis oF Beorin9 is the West Right oF Way line o¢ Livingston Rood bein9 2,00'16,57oW. 9) Not v~tid unless signed ond sealed with the embossed seat of' the prof'essionet tend surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH CHECKED BY:, SCALE: J DATE: F~ NO.: NBT TB ~ SCAt_E 09-17-96 -105 S~~2 OF2 3301 OF?IC£ 0£ CAPITAL PROJ£CT$ EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34-112 (9,1.1) 774-8192 A~RIPTION ~(_N 0 T Slope, PROJECT NO.. ~00~1 PROJECT PARCEL NO._ ~0~. TAX PARCEL NO.~ 24755005004 utility and maintenance easement I,EGALDESCRIPTION A portion of Tract "A" of the plat thereof~, BRIARWOOD PLAZA, as reco;'ded in Plat Book 17, Pagcs 24 anti 25 nfthe Puhlic Records of Collier County, l~orida and being more pnnicularly described a~ rnllnws; CO~ENCE n~ ~l~e ~e.thwesl Corner o~s~id Trac~ "A", said PO~ o~ Commencement lying at fl~e phial o~ lmersecdon o~the Noah Right o~Way llne Road (CA 856) and ~he East Right of Way line ofgi~ngston Road (CE 880; lh~ce along said east Right of Way line N O0° 16' 57' E 858.49 feet to~hePO~OF BEG~NG; 1hence continue N O0~ 16' 57" E 51.47 feet; thence lea~ng said Right oFWayNne S 89° 43' 03" E 10.00 feet; lhence S 00~ 16' 57" W 51.47 Feet; lhence N 89° 43' 03" W lO.00feet~olhePO~OFBEO~O. Containing 515 square feet more or less. ~. ,~ ~s[s of BeaHngs is th~ West line ~faforesnid Tract "A" being N 00~ 16' 5~' E. Sheet I of 2 RICHMOND PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLUER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 3301 F TAMIAtq TP^,, ~,~r~, ............ 8 90Z s OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS ASI IAMIAMI IRAII_ NAPI_ES, FLORIDA $41 12 [941) 774 8192 5KE'ICH OF' DESCRIPDON 5.47'43'48'£. 55.82' s.oo. 6'~7'w. 53.00' 60.07' I S£CDON CORNER--// S.48~ 7'36'W. 53.82' 68.91'  - s.sg'43'03'E. 10.00' BRIARWOOD PLAZA PB 17/ PG 24 TRACT A I'E. (~ 58.78' N.87'46'06'£. 576.99° S.87'46'06'W. 486.1 RADIO ROAD -P.O.B. /- S.74'43'24'E. 66.49' GENERAL NDTES I) P.O.C. indicates Po;hr o£ Commencenent 2) P.0,}3 iht;ica res Point oF' Bec)inning 3) Sec, indicates Section ' 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) ~9e, i~dicotes Z~nge 6) R/~ indicates Right_oF_way 7) AH distances ace in feet and decimals thefeo¢ B) Bosls oF 3eorings is the ~.'est tine oF Tract 'A' being N.O0'I~ '57'E, 9) Not ratio unless sig~ed a~d seol~d '~ith the e~bosse¢ seal oF the professional to~d sumveyo¢ THIS IS ONLY A SK~CH 0~ ~: CH[C~ED BY: , SCALE: D~[: r~{ NO: NBT TD SCALE 09-16-96 LRBRIO6A SHEET 2 OF 2 8 B 1 ,'^R~.~:,. ~ 107' 5501 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA (941) 774-8192 54112 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION Project # bOOb1 N.89'20'35"E. 200.00' ,n. PARCEL 107 ° o ~ S.89'20'53"W. 200.00' The Eest ten (10') feet of Lots 29 and 30 and the East ten (10') feet al' the South twenty (20') feet of Lot 31. of the Plat thereof. Collier County Product;on Purk Phase l-B, as recorded in Plat Book 15, Pages 7 and 8 of the Public Records of Collier Count),, Florida. Conloin~ng 2,Z]O ~quare feet more or less. Basis of Bearings is the West Right cf 'C/my o' Livingston Road being N.OO'16'57"E. CHECKED SC~.LE: DATE: N~T TD SCALE 09-]8-96 Gj~GE 'R. RICHMONO DATE: PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR #2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX MIAMI IRA FILE PLO.: LR-107 SHEET I OF 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA ,34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION Proloct Fo I 'i o # # 60001 27155001908 U 0 N.89'20'33"E. .~n ~o LOT 31 ~/, 5.89'20'55"W. PARCEL The Cc}st ten (10') feet of the North fl0' feet of Lot ,31 of the Plot thereof Colqer Courtly Production Pork Phase I-B. os recorded in Plot Book 1,5, Pages 7 ~nd ,B of the Pu[)lic Records nf Collier County, Florida. Contc]ining ~D square feet more or less. Basis of Bearings is the West Right of Wc~y of Livingston Rood being N.00'16'57"E. DRAWN BY: O~ECWED I~: *~L£: OAT[: NOT TD e¢-.~, r- 09-1t3-96 PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR t~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX E TAMIAMI TRAIL Fit[ NO,: I_P-RnR SHEET 1 OF 8 B 1 9o? OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS E.',%T 'rAM, i/'.,Mt rR,",II_ NAPLES, FLORIDA ('941) 774-8192 34112 slope, SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION PROJECT NO. 60061 PARCEL NO. 909 FOLIO NO. 27155002004 utility & maintenance easement bJ _J © Z © O N.89'20'33"E. LOT 32 S.89'20'33"W. / ~:~ lO' 200.00' 0 o ': Z'- 200.00' The East ten (10') Feet of Lot 32 of thc Plat thereof Collier County ProCuction Pork Phase l-B, as recorded in Plot Book 15, Pages 7 and 8 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Contoinin9 1000 square feet more or less. Basis of Bearings is the West Right of Way of Uvingston Road being N.OO'16'57"E. DPAWN BY: :;:i' ,, ,.., r 09 CE.~)R'GE R. RICMMOND '- . _ PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROdECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 301 E 39:62 I P-~09 SHEET 1 OF ! 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA (941) 774-8192 34112 913 slope, Curve Rodius = A = 89'02'52' Arc = 25.06' SKETCH OF' DESCRIPTION utility & maintenance PROJECT NO. easement PARCEL NO. EXCHANGE AVENUE 60' R/W S.89'18'34"W. 175.41' LOT 37 LOT 36 LOT 35 LOT 34 LOT 33 N.89'18'54"E. m Z O O, 200.00' 60061 913 folio #271 55002509 folio #27155002402 o " foZio #27155002305 8o O Z'- folio #271 55002208 folio #27155002101 The Eost ten (10') feet of Lots 3.3 through 37, inclusive of the Plot thereof, Collier County Production Pork Phose l-B, os recorded in Plot Book 15, Poges 7 ond 8 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florido. Contoining 5200 squore feet more or less. Bosis of Beorings is the West Right of Woy of Livingston Rood being N.00'lS'42"E. CwEC~ED [~ , SCALE: DATE: NUT T~ ~.~ R. RICH OND F'f~'OFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAl. PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX FILE NO.: 88i 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .34112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO._, TAX PARCEL NO 00281880007 LEGAL DESCRIPTION ('NOT A SURV~'Y) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement I,EGAi, DESCRIPTION Parcel 122 COMMENCE at the East Quarter Corner orSccdon 36. Township 49 South, Range 26 East Collier County. Florida. said POINT OF COMMENCEMENT being the Point of' Intersection of'Ibc West Right of'Way line of'Livingston Road and the South Right of' Way line or Enterprise Avenue; thence mn along said West Right of Way line S 00° 16' 57" W 60 O0 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING ofthe parcel ofland hereinafter described; thence N 45° 10' 49" W 84.17 feet to theSouth Right ofWay line of Enterprise Avenue; thence N 89° 21' 25" E 34.60 to Point of Curvature ora curve to tl~e right having a radius of 25.00 feel, a central angle of 90° 55' 12", a arc distance of 3967 feet and a chord which bears S 45° 10' 49" E to it point oftangency; and the West Right of Way line of Livingston Road; thence S 00° 16' 57" W 34.60 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Containing 1661 square feet more or less. Basis of Bearings is the West Right of Way line of Livingston Road being S00° 16' 57" W~' pa~ bobl~dc%~-~p ~,1 Sheet I of 2 8 B i OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3.301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA ,.34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION 60' R/w ENTERPRISE AVENIJE 54.60' , N.sg'21'25"E. PARCEL 122 70.14' N.45'10'49"W. 14.03' ' ' ' / P.D.C. 0-1 34.60' Radius : 25,00' /x~ : 90055,12, Arc : 39,67' Tangent = 25,40' 0 PARCEL 122 DR~WN BY: GENERAL NE]TEg I) PDC. indicates Point oF Commencement 2) PO,B. i~dicotes Point OF Beginning 3) Sec, i~dicotes Section 4) Twp. ~ndicates Township 5) Rge. indicotes Ronge 6) R/~ imd~cotes Right-oF-woy 7) All distomces o~e im Feet 8) Bosis oF ~eomings is the West Right oF Woy lime or Livingston Rood being S.00']6'57'~. 9) Not voHd unless signed ond seoled with the embossed seoI of the Pro~essiono[ Iond su~veyo~ THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH CHECKED BY: SCALE: D,',TE: FILE NO.; NDT TO SCALE oe-le-e6 LR-IBB S~~ET 2 OF 2 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA (941) 774 --8192 54112 PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. TAX PARCEL NO. SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) drainage, utility & maintenance easement LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 822 COMMENCE at thc East Quarter Comer of Section 36, l'ownship 49 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida, said POINT OF COMMENCEMENT being the POINT OF INTERSECTION of the West Right of Way line of Livingston Road and the South Right of Way line of Enterprise Avenue; thence mn along said West Right of Way line N 89° 21' 25" W 60.00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING of the parcel ofland hereinafter described; thence continueN 89° 21' 25" W 347.72 feet; thence S 0° 16' 5T' W 15.00feet; thence S 89° 21' 25"E 363.06feet; thenceN45° 10' 49"W 21.52 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. Conlaining 5331 square feet more or less. Basis of Bearings is the West right of Way line of Livingston Road being S 00° 16' 57" W. Sheet I of 2 pal\bohqgldcscrip 062a ICI~CI(~.D BY: I .$r.~: I D,~IE: .-., --p//'~/,, 4 F_v~GE R. RICHMONI2r PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR #2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROdECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 2,301 E TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES~ FLORIDA 34112 I'~ "°': I SHEET .'"OF 8 B 1 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 7331 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 54112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION 60' R/W /<.,o.~, ~ N..~'~'~"E. ~.~'_~.'~ ~0.0o.' 1/ ? C.?ez ~~~~~~..o.~,. ~ -~~.~' ~". ~."~ '~' PAR ~ ~ N.46'10'49"W.~ ~ I~ $.R9'19'4 9"W. '<'"'- 10.00' GENER~%I_ l) P.[]C ;~clicates Point nC ~) P.[]~ ~dirntps Pnir, t oF Beoinnin0 3) Sec. ,-diorites Sect,on 4) T,~,r; [~d;cntes Township 5) ROe. ;~dic~tes Ronoe 6) R/',/ ,<dic~ tos Pight-nF -w~y O) Pnsi~ oF Rencinos is the West [eight oF Way tinn nr l..ivinosto,~ Pnnrt hoi~0 Z.~O'lG'57'~. ~)) No~ velid unlnfiq ,;i(jn¢,¢l nncl ,,f,nlf,rt with the THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 54112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO. ~.~ C'O ~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. ~Z,~ TAX PARCEL NO. J3_O2~'~_m~o_n07 SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope, utility & maintenance easement LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 922 COMMENCE at the East Quarter Comer of Section 36, Township 49 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida, said POINT OF COMMENCEMENT being the POINT OF INTERSECTION of the West Right of Way line of Livingston Road and the South Right of Way line of Enterprise Avenue, thence run along said West Right of Way line S O0° 16' 57" W 60 00 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING ofthe parcel of land hereinaQer described; thence continue S 00° 16' 57" W 445.95 feet;thence S 89° 19' 49" W 10.00 feet; thence N 00° 16' 5T' E 455.95 feet, thence S 45° 10' 49" E 14.03 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING Containing 4510 square feet more or less, Basis of Bearings is the West right of Way line of Livingston Road being S O0° 16' 57" W Sheet 1 of 2 DRA~N BY: 8 B 1 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (041) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION S..89'19'49"W. '~-'- 10.00' GENER^L NOTES 1) P.Lq,C. i~dicates PoFn~ ot' Commencement ~) P.~.]]. i~dica'tes Point oF ~eoinninO 3) Sec. indicates §ectinn 4) TwD, Ind,cates Township 5) Rge. indicnte~ RanOe 6) R/'.' indicates Ri~)ht-oF--wny 7) 411 distances ~pe i~ Fept cad decimals ~hepeoF 8) B~sis oF Beepings is the ~est Rioht oF ~y 9) No~ v~lid unless sioned nnd sealed ~ith the THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH (.,C,ll [: rq[]T TI] SCALE 11-22-96 LR-822 SHEET 2 OF 2 PROJECT NO. ~ OO ~ I PROJECT PARCEL NO. 906 A FOLIO NO. SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope, utility & maintenance easement The West Ten (10) feet Tract "P," Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT 10' Exisbrxj 15 fool Preserve Easement TRACT P Pr~,~enm Area Ex~st~ng 15 foot 8u~f~.r Easement GL-~RGE R. RICHMOND ELS. 2406 33(11 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 N 8 B 1 PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. ~ FOLIO NO. 2~75750~508 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope, utility & maintenance easement The West Ten (10) feet Tract "D-l,' Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT .! · -- Exis~ng 30' foot El SKETCH NOT TO SCALE 8 B 1 PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. ~ FOLIO NO. 24?6?$10165 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) -~lope & maintenance easement The West Fifteen (15) feet Lot 55, Block B,Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT ' - GEORGE R. RICHMOND P. LS. 2406 3301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34 ! 12 N SKETCH NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NO. ~OO~ I PROJECT PARCEL NO. FOLIO NO. ~4'7~'7~1 n149 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope & maintenance easement The West Fifteen (15) feet Lot 54, Block B, Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT BY~'~ ......... DATE.. GE'SDRGE R. RICHMOND P. LS 2406 3301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 N SKETCH NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NO. 60061 PROJECT PARCEL NO. 512 FOLIO NO. 24767510123 SKETCH a LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) PERPETUAL SLOPE & MAINTENANCE EASEMENT The West Fifteen (15) feet Lot 53, Block B. Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of CoIlier County, Florida. G~r§e R. Richmond, PLSL2'~0-6'~ Collier County Cove~menC Complex 3301E Tam±am± Naples, FL 34112 SKETCH NOT TO SCALE 8 B 1 PROJECT NO. ~<::) ~, / PROJECT PARCEL NO. ...~!~ FOLIO NO. 2~.76750990! SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope & maintenance easement The West Fifteen (15) feet Lot 42, Block B, Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Col!;er County, Florida. SUBJECT > LOT NO 42 / _, Ex,~:,n<j 30 foot ~ 8~er Easeme~,~//'"' BY..~':.~'~.. c . . f ' . ..... GF:~RG~ R. RICHMOND P. LS. 2406 33¢)1 E TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPI.ES. FLORIDA 34112 N SKETCH NOT TO SCALE 8 B i PROJECT NO. ~F")~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. 515 FOLIO NO. 747675o9_~88 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTIO~I (NOT A SURVEY) slope & maintenance easement The West Fifteen (15) feet Lot 41, Block B, Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 o 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT · LOT NO. 41 :* ....15' _...[ , 3301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 SKETCH NOT TO SCALE 8 B 1 PROJECT NO. ,"~g)~G / PROJECT PARCEL NO. ~1~ FOLIO NO. 24767509862 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope & maintenance easement The West Fifteen (15) feet Lot 40, Block B, Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT .: , ._ B~er Easemem :* -- 15' GI~P, GER. RICHMOND P.L.S. 2406 .1,301 E. TAMIAMI ~AIL NAPLES. FLOAIDA 34112 AT SKETCH NOT TO SCALE 8 B 1.' PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. FOLIO NO. 2~. ?_~7599529 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTIOM (NOT A SURVEY) slope & maintenance easement /he West Fi~een (15) feet Lot 23, Block B, Bria~vood Uni! One, accordinG [o the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT Exi~tJ~ 30 foot Buffer Easeme~! NAPLES. FLORJDA 34,~2 SKETCH NOT TOSCALE 8 B 1' PROJECT NO. (/~,,~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. FOLIO NO. ~?~ SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope~ ut. tltt-y & maint, enance easement. The East Ten (10) feet of Lot 38, Collier County Production Park Phase I-B, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 15, Pages 7 and 8, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. LOT 38 SUBJECT (10') Exchange Avenue .. ' h ..:', ,"1 l/ GE~GE R. RICHMOND P.L.S. 2406 -- 3301 E. TAMIAMI T~IL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 SKETCH NOT TOSCALE e B 1 i PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO..~'/~ FOLIO NO. 24'7'67509s03 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope & maintenance easement The West Fifteen (15) feet Lot 22, Block B, Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT OF, OkGE R. RICHMOND P.L.S. 2406 33~1 E. TAMIAMi TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 N SKETCH NOT TO SCALE 881 PROJECT NO. ~OO,,~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. 520 FOLIO NO. ?,~ 7 ~; 7 r~ n cl,~ :qn SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTIOH (NOT A SURVEY) slope & maintenance easement The West Fifteen (15) feet Lot 21, Block B, BrianNood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT E~isbr~ 30 Buffe~ Easement LOT NO. 21 15' G~RGE R. RICHMOND PL.S. 2406 3301 E, TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34I 12 SKETCH NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NO. ~00~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. 52 / FOLIO NO. )4'/~;'7~nc~4~4 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) sloper & maintenance easement The West Fifteen (15) feet Lot 20, Block B, Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT 15' Ex~ng 30 toot Buffer Easement LOT NO. 20 GEI~,GE R. RICHMOND P.L.S. 2406 3301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 N SKETCH NOT TO SCALE 8 B 1 PROJECT NO. ~('~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. FOLIO NO. 247_~7509fi~.8 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope & maintenance easement The West Fifteen (15) feet Lot 19, Block B, Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. Exisbng 30 foot -- ~ Buff~ Easerne~! SUBJECT 15' LOT NO. 19 GEORGE R. RICHMONT) P.L.S, 2406 3301 }:~. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPI,ES. FLORIDA 34112 N SKETCH NOT TO SCALE 8 B 1 PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. FOLIO NO. SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope & maintenance easement The West Fifteen (15) feet Lot 18, Block B, Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, PaGes 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT Exis~ng 30 foot Buffer Easement LOT NO, 18 15' BY .~,,:...-'"./; .."..~....~.~ ~ .......... DATE.. ~"RGE R. R,C.~OND..LS. 2406 33Ol E. TAMIAMI ~AIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 N SKETCH NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NO. ~~ [ PROJECT PARCEL NO. 525 FOLIO NO. ~767~nq4n~ SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope & maintenance easement The West Fifteen (15) feet Lot 17, Block B, Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT ExislJng 30 foot Buffer Easement LOT NO. 17 15' GEORGE R. RICHMOND P.L S 2406 3301 E. TAMIAM! TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 N SKETCH NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. FOLIO NO. 24767509383 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope & maintenance easement The West Fifteen (15) feet Lot 16, Block B, Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. ExislJng 30 foot Buffer Easement SUBJECT '" ..... 15' LOT NO. 16 .,,.~,, // / GEORGE R. RICHMOND P.L.S. 2406 3301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPI,ES. FLORIDA 34112 N SKETCH NOT TO SCALE 8 B 1' PROJECT NO. ~::~/ PROJECT PARCEL NO. 527 FOLIO NO. 247675o9367 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope &maJ. nlzenance easement: The West Fifteen (15) feet Lot 15, Block B, Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT , Exisbng 30 foot Buffer Easement LOT NO. 15 ¸'4 /-? ~ · ,- ,, , · ./ /" ! 7--.-~' ~'' '~' .......................... ~'''~ .... GEO'I6,GE R. RICHMOND P. LS. 2406 " 3301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 N SKETCH NOT TO SCALE 8 B 1 PROJECT NO. ~ ~,,"J~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. 5'26 FOLIO NO. SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope & maintenance easement The West Fifteen (15) feet Lot 14, Block B, Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT Ex,Sang 30 Buffer Easemen! LOT NO. 14 15' By }~.'.--/~h<'~,(.,.F' Date: ?//~'~ George R. Richmond, PLS 2406 ' Collier County Government Complex 3301 E Tamiami Trail Naples, F1 34112 SKETCH NOT TO SCALE 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA (941) 774-8192 34112 PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. 12_? TAX PARCEL NO. ~'7'~;~nnn685 _LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 129 BEGIN at the Northeast corner of Lot 55 ofthe Plat thereofCollier County Production Park Phase 3-A as recorded in Plat Book 22, Pages 59 and 60 ofthe Public Records of Collier County, Florida, said POINT OF BEGINNING also lying on the West Right of Way line ofl.ivingston Road; thence along said West Right &Way line S 00° 03' 15" E 175.27 feet to a Point &Curvature ora curve to the right having a radius of 25.00 feet. a central angle of 89° 23' 45", an arc distance of 39.0! feet and a chord which bears S 44' 38' 38" W to its point oftangency, said point lying on the North Right of Way line of Enterprise Avenue', thence S 89° 20' 30" W 24.94 feet; thence leaving said north Right ofWayline N 38° 05' 19" E 64.24 feet;thence N 00° 03' 15" W 149.91 feet; thence N 89° 20' 30" E 10.00 feet to the POINT OF BEG1NNlNG. Containing 2863 square feet more or less. Basis of Bearing is tile West Right of Way line of Livingston Road being S 00° 03' 15" E. pal bob lgld,...~crip 061 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3501 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 Curve number 1 Radius = 25,00' A = 89'23'45' Arc = 39.01' SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION PARCEL 129 N.8g'20'30"E. I N.38'O5'19"E.-~ ~I I/ 95.32' L/ , ~/C-1 S.89'20'30"W. 120.05' x- 24.94' ENTERPRISE AVENUE 60' R/W 145.oo' /~P,D,B. I I0' 0 GENERAL NOTES ]) P.O,C, indicates Point oF Commencement 2) P.O.B, indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. indic(~tes Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Ego. indicates ~nge 6) R/~ indicates Right-oF-way 7) A~ distances ore i~ Fee~ ~nd decimals ~hereoF 8) B~sis oF Be~ings is ~he ~es~ Righ~ oF ~y tine oF Livingston Ro~d being S.00'03'15'E. 9) No~ voUd unless signed end seoled wl~h ~he embossed se~t oF the proFessionot t~nd surveyor 8 B 1 PROJECT NO.._~(~)4'~:,/ PROJECT PARCEL NO. ~'.~O FOLIO NO. 24767.509325 ,.SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope & maintenance easement The West Fifteen (15) feet Lot 13, Block B, Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT /V SKETCH NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NO. ,'~(~O(~ / . PROJECT PARCEL NO. 53/ FOLIO NO. 24767509309 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope & maintenance easement The West Fifteen (15)feet Lot 12, Block B, Briarwood Unit One, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 18, Pages 40 - 42, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT o ?' GEORGE R. RICHMOND P.L.S. 24¢)6 3301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 N SKETCH NOT TO SCALE 8 B 1 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA (941) 774-8192 34112 PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. 13Z. A TAX PARCEL NO. 00281600009 .LEGAL DESCRIPTION [NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 36 TOWNSHIP 49 SOU'D{ RANGE 25 EAST; TI~NCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36, A DISTANCE OF 260.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 24000 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF ICL0(} FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES Ig SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 240. I ! FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 20 MINq. TI"ES 55 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF' 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 2,401 SQUARE FEET (0.055 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 BEING NORTH 130 I)EGREES 02 MINUTES 11¢ SECONDS WEST. PARCEL 132A 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EASY TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (9-I- 1) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION PROGRESS AVENUE 60' R/W _~~ so.oo'-,t . -L ~-- 3~-~-~_ -- ~ I PARCEL 832B $5,16'- "--J 75.00' ~ ' 525.98' 25.06'-~~'J 75.00' ~ '~,, -, N.89'21'15"E. 56.27'~ ,/11 x',._ PARCEL 132B z 0 15 00' 0 Z K o PARCEL 832A 10.00'- ~0.00'/ ~_p.~.~, GENERAL NBTEg ~- P,~,C, ~) P.B,C. indicates Point o~ Commencemen~ ~) P.B,~, indice~es Point o~ Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) R9e, indicates R~nge 6) ~/~ inoicotes Right-oF-wey 7~ ~tt distonces e~e in Fee~ ~nd decimals 8) B~sis o~ be~ings is ~he Ees~ line oF soid ~ection 3~ being N.O0'O~'i8'~. 9) Not v~lid u~p~5 ~iQ~H n~H qp~n~ w{+~ +~ Eost Line of Sec. 36, Twp. 49S, Rge. 25E 13ZA 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .34112 (94-1) 774-8192 PROJECT NO. ~ 00~ PROJECT PARCEL NO. I~ TAX PARCEL NO. 0028460000_0 iI. EGAL. DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement Commcncin§ at the East Quarter Corner of'Section 36, Township 49 South Range 25 East Collier County, Florida; thence Noah 0 Degrees 02 Minutes 18 Seconds West along the East line of Section 36 and the West Right-of-Way line of Livingston Road, a distance of 1241.96 feet to The Point of Beginning; Ihence continuing Noah along said line, a distance of 75.00 feet to the South Right-of-Way line of Progress Avenue; thence South 89 degrees 21 minutes 15 seconds West along said South Right. of-Way line a distance of 75 00 feet; thence leaving said Soulh Right. of-Way line South 45 degrees 20 minutes 32 seconds East, a distance of 105.50 feet to the Point of Beginning; said described tract containing 0 ~5 Acre (2,812 square feet), more or less Basis of Bearings is the East line of said Section 36 being North 00 degrees 02 minutes 18 seconds West Tract 132B COUJER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 3301 E TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 33962 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 5501 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION /'East Line of / Sec, 36, Twp. 49S. PROGRESS AVENUE 60' .R,/W Fl Raja. 25E 50'00' ' I..;;; N.89'21'15"E. 75.00-% Ir- ~ i /~ PARCEL 832B Pr' ' 525.98' /'~'~.1 75.00' 'C> ''~'' ', N 45'20'32"W ' ,os so' ' II X'- PARCEL 7328 L,J ~ ' I"-p,D,B, Z o n.' Ld PARCEL 132C 15,00' PARCEL 832At'/' J/ lO. OO'1 PARCEL 132A r'~/~ 10.00'/' GENERAL NBTES 1) P.E].C. indicates Point oF' Commencement 2) P.B,B. indicates Point o¢ Beginnin9 3) Sec, indicates Section 4) Twp, Indicates Township 5) Rge, indicates Range 6) R/W indicates Right-of'-way 7) Att distances ape in Feet and decim(:~ts ther'eo¢ 8) Basis o¢ bearings is the East line o¢ s(zld '~-P.D,C, East Quarter Corner of Sec..36, Twp. 49S., Rge. 25E. Section 36 being N,00'0~3'IB'V/, 9) Not valid unless signed and seated with the embossed secd oF the pr'oFessionat land sur'veyor- THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH CHECKED BY: SCALE: DARE: FILE NO,: ' NDT TD ~-nr. ~. 8 B 1 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA ,.34112 (941) 774'68192 ,LEGAL PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO., fAX PARCEL NO._ nn~n'~;nnnflq DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) [kj~%~ drainage & maintenance easement COMMENCING AT THE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 36 TOWNSIlIP 49 SOUTH RANGE 25 EAST; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION36 AND TIlE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD A DISTANCE OF 131696 FEET TO TIIE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE WEST R/GHT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND TIlE SOUTH RiGtTT OF WAY LINE OF PROGRESS AVENUE; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 15 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF PROGRESS AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 7f00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING WEST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 516.00 FEET; TilENCE SOUTH 00 DEGREES 03 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH g9 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 15 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 53 [.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 21.01 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING'. SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 7852 SQUARE FEET (0.180 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS TIlE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 BEING NORTH O0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST. PARCEL 832 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS s~o~ ~-^ST T^M~^M~ TR^~L N^PL~-S, ~-LOR~D^ (94~) 774-8~92 S.34'44'28"W.- 61.55' S. 00'03'13"E. -/ 15.00' Z <~ 0 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION ;[ .S.89.21,15.w. /1' ' '//- Z'PARCEL 852 N.89'21'15"E. PROGRESS AVENUE 60' R/W PARCEL 852A]I/ ¢J 10.00'/ GENERAL NOTES 1) P,O.C. i~,dicotes Point oF Commencement 2) P,F1.]~, indicates Point aP ]~eglnning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp, Indicates Township .5) Rge. indicates Range [/.East Line of Sec. 36, Twp. 4gs, Rge. 25E N.45'20'$2"W. 21.01' PARCEL 132B 0 Z 0 Z ~-P,D.C, 6) R/~/ indicates Right-oF-way 7) ALl distances are in Feet and decimals ~hereoF 8) 3asis oF bearings is the East Line oF said Section 36 being N.00'02'IB'~/. 9) Not vali~ unless signed and sealed with the embossed seal oF the professional I~nd surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH I qNF'F-'F ? C~F' 9 LEGAL 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA (941) 774-8192 34112 DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) PROJECT NO., ~00~/ PROJECT PARCEL NO. 932 TAX PARCEL NO. OO28~6nnnna slope, utility & maintenance easement COMMENCING AT TIlE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SECTION 36 TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTtl RANGE 25 EAST; THENCE NOR'Df 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EASTLINE OF SECTION 36 A DISTANCE OF 500.01 FEET TO TIIE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 741.95 FEET; TIlENCE NORTH 4:5 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 14.07 FEET; THENCE SOUTI! 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 751.84 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES $7 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 7,469 SQUARE FEET (0. I72 ACRE). MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS Tile EAST LINE OF SECTION 36 BEING NOR'Fl{ Oo DEGREES C2 MINUTES 181 SECONDS WEST. PARCELq'32. P~'}S,&AL LaND SU.Vr'~OR ~=4o~ ' OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA ,34112 (941) 774-8192 DRAWN ~f: SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION / East Line of / Sec..36, Twp. 49S, PROGRESS AVENUE 60' R/W V[ Rge. 25E 50.00' .Xl :i:. ~ '--t 75.00'"' ' ~ ! 525.98I 25 06'--J~N~I~ZX'''t 75'00' '0 '"'--" N'89'21'15''E. '~6,27'./ i /I ~) ';4~07' F' I i PARCEL 132B Z [~'I~,TI~;G ',rr Pi" -o, I :;I© © Z 0 q ° PARCEL ?&Z Z ,o. PARCEL 152A [~ 10.00'~ 5.00' GENERAL N[~ TES l) P.D.C. indicates Point oF Commencement ~) P.O.[~. indicates Point oF Be§innir,9 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge. indic0tes Range 6) I~/W indicates Right-of-way 7) All distances ore in Feet and decimals theeeoF 8) ~o5is o¢' beoeings is t~e E~st line oF said ~"- P,D.C. Sect on 36 being N.OO'Oe'IS'W. 9) Not v~liU un[ess signed amd sealed with the embossed scot oF the proFessionol land surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH CHECKED D.aTE: FILE NO.: N~T TFI ...... 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 £EGAL eRO, ECT NO. I PROJECT PARCEL NO..7-.~.~,4 TAX PARCEL NO.. DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) 733A&B temporary construction easement 833 drainage & maintenance easement COMM'ENCING AT TIlE EAST O[JARTER CORNER OF SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF lO0.00 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD; THENCE NORTI{ 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTE. S IR SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EAST R]GIIT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 275.4g FEET TO THE POINT OF BEG[~ING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 48.25 FEET; TIIENCE LEAVING SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 12.10 FEET; THENCE NORTtl 43 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 88.20 FEET; THENCE NORTH 84 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 00 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 186.59 FEET TO TtIE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF TRACT L.4 AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF BRIARWOOD UNIT ONE AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 18 PAGES 40-42 OF TIlE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 44 DEGREES 56 MINUTES 56 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE A DISTANCE OF 31.52 FEET: TIIENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH%VESTERLY LINE SOUTH 84 DEGREES 20 MINUTES 00 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 154.84 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 43 DEGREES 46 MINUTES 03 SECONDS ',VEST, A DISTANCE OF 86 68 FEET' TIIENCE SOUTH 36 DEGREES 38 MINUTES 42 SECONDS ',VEST, A DISTANCE OF 37.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING', SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 0.134 ACRE ($,814 SQUARE FEET), MORE OR LESS. TOGETHER WITH A TEN (IO')FOOT WIDE EASEMENT WHOSE SOUTH LINE ABUTS TIlE NORTH I.INE OF TIlE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL,(PARCEL 733A) AND A TEN FOOT WIDE EASEMENT WHOSE NORTH LINE ABUTS THE SOUTH' LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PARCEL(PARCEL 733B). BASIS OF BEARINGS IS TI,~E EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD BEING NORTH oo DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST. PARCEL 833 PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ~/2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COUPLI_eX 3301 E TAM1AMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 330i EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 54112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION TEMPORARY - CONSTRUCTION / . EASEMENT / Parcel 733A 7 '- ~J'~'~?2"~" / _-.,-- s~68' EASEMENT ' S.36'58'42"W. .' 37.61' Z~ O O3O CpO P.O.]], P,F1,C, 100.00' East Quarter Corner Sec. 31, Twp. 49 S., Rge. 26 E. CtI£CI<[D GENERAL NOTE2 1) P,O.C. indite'Ecs PoinL oF Commencement 2) PO.B'. indica-tes Point nC [)eoinnlnO 3) Sec. indicn'tes Sec Lion ,1) Twp, [ndicn Les Townsldp 5) Pge. indicates RQnOe 6) R/~ inclic~%es 7) Ail clistmncefi ore in Feet mad decimols thereof 8) Bosi5 or hootings i5 [he Eos'~ R/W tine OF LivN~os Lon Rood 9) Not valid unleSS sion~d nnd sealed with the embossed 5eol oF the P~oFession~l tend su~veyo~ THIS IS ONLY A SK~CH Hill TH ': 8 B'I 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO. t~ ~0~ PROJECT PARCEL NO. 833B-o~', 7.~3c- TAX PARCEL NO. _LEGAL DESCRIPTION [NOT A SURVEY) #833B drainage & maintenance easement #733C&733D - temporary con.~tr,ction ea,~ement A PERPETUAL DRAINAGE, UTILITY & MAINTENANCE EASEMENT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNOR OF SECTION 3 ], TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUN"TY, FLOR]DA; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 1~ SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EAST RIGIiT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 139l .44 FEET; THENCE NORTH g9 DEGREES 5'/MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF I 0.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; TIIENCE CONTINUING EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 390.(X} FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; TllENCE SOUTH ~9 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 3'.R).00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 0.179 ACRE (?,800 SQUARE FEET), MORE OR LESS. (PARCEL g33B - OT) TOGETI-LER WITH A TEN (i0') FOOT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT WHOSE SOUTH LINE ABUTS THE NORTH LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED EASEMENT (733D - OT) AND A TEN (10') FOOT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT '~VHOSE NORTH LINE ABUTS THE SOUTH LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED EASEMENT(?33C . OT) BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD BEING NORTH O0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES I{~ SECONDS ~,VEST. EO.,RI~E R. RICHMOND DATE: PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY COVERNMENT COMPLEX 3301 E TAMIAMI TRA~L NAPLF_$. FLORIDA 34117 881 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 5.301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .34112 (941) 774-8192 DR~WN BY: Sec. 31, Twp. 49S, Rge. 26E P,O,C,---...~ SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION 251.~0 __~1 ~,~.89.~7,~5-E s.89.~7'~s-w/ II/PARCEL 933A-OT oo.oo. ~ (7~D-OT) / P,B,B,~ I I ~N.O0'02 18 W, / ~N.89'57'43 E. ~. CEL ~339-0T -'k ~ / 20.00' // ~.o.oo' / / oo, b ~ X 20.00. 0 0 Z N.OO'O2'lS"W. West Ou~der Corner ~~EAST R/W LINE k S.89'52'40"E. 100.00' GENERAL NBTES ~) P.~.C. i~dica~es Poin~ o~ Comme~ceme~% ~) P.B,B. Indtca~e~ Poin~ o~ 3) Sec, imdlca~es Sec%io~ 4) Twp. ~d~ca*e~ Township 5) Rge. Indica{es Range G) R/~ Indic~tes Right-oF-way 7) All distances ~e In ¢ee~ ~nd declm~ls thereof 8) Basis oF bearings is the East R/~ line oF Livingston Roa~ being N,00'0~']8'~. 9) Not v~ti~ untess signed and sealed with the embossed se~l oF the p~oFession~[ I~nd surveyo~ THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH 88'1 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO. ~~ ! PROJECT PARCEL NO. R))B-or I~J)E. ~T TAX PARCEL NO. O0295880gog LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY} slope, utility & maintenance #933B temporary construction easement #733E & 733F A PERPETUAL UTILITY AND MAINTENANCE EASEMENT MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; CO~IMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER COR~/ER OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA; TitENCE SOUTH g9 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF !00.00 FEET TO THE EAST RIGtlT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD; TtlENCE NORTIt O DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 1284.44 FEET; THENCE NORTH ~9 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 43 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; TltENCE CONTINUING EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 130.OIJ FEET'. TtlENCE NORTII 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; TIIENCE SOUTH ~9 DEGREES 5'/MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINLrFES I~ SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 20.o0 FEET TO TIlE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING oofio ACRE (2.~00 SQUARE FEET). MORE OR LESS. (933B. BT) TOGETHER WITH A TEN (1o') FOOT TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT WtlOSE NORTtt LINE ABUTS TIlE SOUTII LINE OF TIlE ABOVE DESCRIBED EASEMENT (733E -O'r) AND A TEN (10') FOOT TEMPORARY CO NSTRUC~I-ION EASEMENT WIIOSE SOUTll LINE ABUTS TIlE NORTtl LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED EASEMENT(?33F. BT) .BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD BEING NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 1~41NUTES 18 SECONDS WEST. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR j~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUN'P~' GOVERNMENT COMPLEX OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION 25130 l, N.8g'$7'35"E. -ltl' S.89'37'01"W.-z I 100.00' L/PARCEL 933-A-aT 0 I IrN 89'57'43"E '"- 20 00'-, / ' ' · - ' ~ / 130.00' c~ P'D'B'-x\ !J / fPARCEL 733F-OT (TEMP CONST E.SMT) 0 Z ~.~/'~'-~.z~'Z-Z2~ ~ S.00'O2'18"E. ~o II \ \ . 2o.oo' '~ ~1 \ ~s.8g'57 43"W. ° ;'il ,30.00' Z J~ ~H ~PARCEL 733E-OT (TEMP. CONST. ESMT.) N.00'02'18:W.--x °.// 1058.,~4 XXX~ West Quarter Corner x[ Sec. 51, Twp. 49S, <~ Rge. 26E ~ P.O,c,~ ~_ EAST R/W LINE ~-S.89'52'40"E. 100.00' GENERAL NOTES I) P.O.C. indica~ces Point oF Commencement; 2) P.D.B. indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. Indicates Section 4) Twp, Indicates Township 5) Rge. indicates Range 6) R/W Indicates Right-oF-way 7) All distances are In Fee~ and decimals thereof B) Basis oF bearings is the East R/W line oF Livingst~:n Road being N,OO'O2'IB'W, 9) Not vul:d unless signed and seated with the embossed seal oF ~che professional land surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO. ~00~ PROJECT PARCEL NO. ¢:~BA'OT' TAX PARCEL NO,. 00295880909 LEGAL DESCRIPTION !NOT A SURVEY) slope, utility and maintenance COMMENCING AT TI IE WEST QUAI{TER CORNOR OF SECTION 3 I, TOWNSI lip 49 SOUTII. RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 40 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 100.00 FEET TO TIlE EAST RIGIIT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD; TIIENCE NORTII 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST ALONG SAID EAST RIGIrr OF WAY LINE. A DISTANCE OF 266.18 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; TIIENCE CONTINUING NORTI I ALONG SAID LINE. A DISTANCE OF 2379.96 FEET TO 'DIE NORTtl LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION 31; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF SECTION 31 NORTtl 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 26 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 34 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 33.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTI! 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST, ALONG A LINE LYING TEN (10') FEET EAST. AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO, SAID EAST RIGIIT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 2350.1)2 FEET; TIIENCE SOUTII 89 DEGREES 57 MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF IO.00 FEET TO 'DIE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 11.552 ACRE (24,025 SQUARE FEET). MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS TIlE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD BEING NORTH 00 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST. PARCEL 933t'OT BY: '-- ' / 6F..~QRGE R. 'RICFIMOND DATE: PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 8 B 1 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 5501 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 541 12 (941) 774-8192 25,30 S.893 100.00' 25.oo'--X SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION \ I .89"37'35"E. '" '--5.26'27'54"W. r,, ~ 3,3.62' ,o 004 "'~933~0T 0 C~ © P,B.B,% West Quarter Corner Sec..31, Twp. 49S, Rge. 26E P,FI.C, GENERAL NOTES ~EAST R/W LINE "%-- $.89'52'40"E, 100.00' I) P.O,C. indic(ires Poinl; of' Commencement 2) P,B.B. indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge. indic(ires Range 6) R/W indicates Rlght-oF-wGy 7) Att dislonces ar'e In Feet Grid decimals %hereof 8) ]3c~sis oF beortngs Is the East R/W tine of' Livingstor, RoaD being N.OO'O2'IB'W, 9) Not votid untess signed (znd se(~ted wi'th the embossed seGt oF the proFession(it rand surveyor' THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH O D J. 3301 O?_PICE O? CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34-112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. TAX PARCEL NO. 00274480003 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF PROGRESS AVENUE AND TIlE EAST LINE OF SECTION 36 TOWNSHIP 49 SOUTH RANGE 25 EAST; THENCE NOR1H 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES Ig SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 540.29 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES .1?.MINu'rEs 0l SECOND WEST. A DISTANCE OF 10.~x) FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 44.62 FEET', THENCE SOUTH 11 DEGREES 47 MINUTES 19 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 48.79 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES (12 MINUTES Ig SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 39.1.17 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 44 DEGREES 42 MINLrFES 44 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 78.12 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST ALONG TIlE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID PROGRESS AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 11,631 SQUARE FEET (0267 ACRE). MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS rs THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION .16 BEING NORTH I 1 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST, PARCEL 135 GE R,-RICHMOND - ESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ~'2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLUER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 3301 E TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 33962 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION S.89'37'01 "W.-'%% 10.00' S.00'02'18"E. 44.62' ~ S.44'42'44"W.-~ J 78.12' ~/' /' 75.00' N. 89'21 '18"E. PROGRESS AVENUE beast Line of Sec. 36, Twp. 49S, Rge. 25E 0 Z 0 Z ~ P,D,B. ~-P,D,C. GENERAL NOTES l) P.F].C. indicotes Point oF Commencement 2) P.[J.~]. indicotes Point oF Beginning 3) Sec, indicotes Section 4) Twp. Indicotes Township 5) Rge. indicetes R~nge 6) R/W indicntes Right-oF-woy 7) At[ distences ere in Ceet ond dedm~ls theCeo¢ 8) ~esls o¢ be~ings Section 3~ being 9) Not va~id untess signed ~nd seeted with the embossed seQ[ oF the P~OFessione[ [and su~veyo~ THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH CHECKED NOT TO SCALE 10-31-96 PR-135 SHEET 2 OF 2 3301 OFFICE CAPITAL PROJ£CT$ EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO PROJECT PARCEL NO. m TAX PARCEL NO. nn~?~,~,~¢)nn~ LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope, utility & maintenance easement CO,XIMENCING AT TIlE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF PROGRESS AVENUE AND T1-IE EAST LINE. OF SECTION 36 TOWNSHI'P 49 SOUTH RANGE 25 EAST: THENCE SOUTI-! g9 DEGREES 21 MINUTES IR SECONDS WEST ALONG 'HIE CENTERLINE OF SAID PROGRESS AVENUE A DISTANCE OF 30.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH o DEGREES 02 MINUTES IR SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 74.91 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; ~IENCE CONTINUING. NORTH ALONG SAID LINE. A DISTANCE OF 4o4.29 FEET; THENCE NORTH l I DEGREES 47 MINUTES 19 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 48.79 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 1R SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 43.52 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES Ol SECOND EAST, A DISTANCE OF I0.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 44.62 FEET; THENCE SOUTH I I DEGREES 47 MINUTES 19 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 4~.79 FEET'. THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 393.17 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 44 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 44 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 1420 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING., SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 4,916 SQUARE FEET (0.113 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE CENTERLINE OF PROGRESS AVEN't~ BEING Sou'ri-[ g9 DEGREES 21 MIN1JTES 18 SECONDS WEST. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLE~ OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION S.89'37'01 "W.--~ I 10.00' ~, N.89'37'01"1 10.00' 43.52'- ,, 48.74' . PARCEL 9~ ..... .. 14.20' N.89'21'18"E. PROGRESS AVENUE -S.OO'O2'18"E. 44.62' S.11 '47'19"w. 48.79' P.O.B. 60' R/W I '~'--p.FI.C, East Line of Sec. 36. Twp. 49S. Rge. 25E DR~WN bY: GENERAL NOTES 1) P.O.C. indicates Point o? Commencement 2) P.O.B. indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp. [nd;cotes Township 5) Rge. indicates Range 6) R/W indicates Right-aC-way 7) At[ distances are in Feet and decimals 8) Basis oF bearings is the Centerline oF Progress Avenue being 9) Not votio unless signed and seated with the embossed seat oF the proFessionaL land surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH IFILE NO.: 8 B ll.' 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAI-"LES, FLORIDA .34112 (941) 774'---8192 PROJECT NO.., ~" ~'J~ ~' PROJECT PARCEL NO. {3~, TAX PARCEL NO. nn~71?/,nnnn SKETCH OF road LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maJntennnce easement COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SEC13ON 36 TOWNSHIP 49 SOLFrH RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; TItENCE SOUTH ¢) DEGREES 02 MINUTES Ig SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SA~D SECTION 36 A DISTANCE OF 7.10.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 01 SECOND WEST, A DISTANCE OF lO.00 FEET: THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES !~! SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 705.15 FEET; THENCE NOR'HI 31 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 46 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 28.95 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF SECTION 36; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 01 SECOND EAST ALONG SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 25.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 0.172 ACRE (7,486 SQUARE FEET). MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE EAST LINE. OF SAID SECTION .~6 BEING SOUTH O0 DEGREES 02 MINU'I~S I~1 SECONDS EAST. PARCEL 136 DRAWN CHECKED BY: I SCALE: PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR #2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY COVERNMENT COMPLEX 3301 £ TAMIAMI TRAIL NAP~112 8 B 1 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 5301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION 25.00'- N.89'37'O1"E. N.31 '14'46"W. - 9.65' 19.50,_/ Twp. 49S Rge, 25E PARCEL 1,36 -P,D,]), , . N.89'37 35 E. .- 28.95' Twp. 49S Rge. 26E ~ o© ~n 0 ~' Z ~ ;n O I:% o ~ o ~ O  EAST LINE SEC. 36 S.89'37'01 "W. I ~0.00'-/ '""'--~0.00' GENERAL NDTES ]) P,D,C. in01io~tes Point oF Commencement 2) P.D.B. indicotes Point oF Beginning 3) Sec, indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge, i~dicates Range 6) R/W indicates Right-oF-way 7) All distances are in Feet and decimals thereof 8) Basis oF Bearings is the West Right o¢ Way line oF Livingston Rood being S.O0'02qS'E. 9) Not votid unless signed and se0led with the enbossed see[ oF the professional rand surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH PR-136 NBT TD SCALE 05-13-97 SHEET 2 OF 2 8 B 1 I' I 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA (941) 774-8192 34112 PROJECT NO. ~00~/' PROJECT PARCEL NO.. TAX PARCEL NO.__ on?7!?/,onOO SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) temporary construction easement COMMENCING AT TIrE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION .t6 TOWNSH~ 49 SOUTH RANGE 25 EAST. COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES Ig SECONDS EAST At,ONG THE EAST LINE OF SECTION .16 A DISTANCE OF 620.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH :~9 DEGREES .17 M~NUTES 01 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF I0.00 FEET TO 'HIE POINT OF BEGINNING; THE:NCR NORTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES Ig SECONDS WEST ALONG A LINE LYING 10 FEET WEST. AS M~ASURED PERPENDICULAR TO. THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION .t6 A DISTANCE OF 595. If FEET', THENCE NORTH .11 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 46 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 19.30 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES lX SECONDS EAST LYING 20 FEET WEST, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO. TIrE EAST LiNE OF SAID SECTION .16 A DISTANCE OF 611.72 FEET; THENCE NORTH ~9 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 01 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEG1N.'.'NING: SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 0.13R ACRE (6034 SQUARE FEET), MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS TIrE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 36 BEING SOUTH iX) DEGREES 02 MrNrUTES 18 SECONDS EAST. PARCEL 7.16 ORAW~ CHECKED OME: / GEO~GE R. RICHMOND DATE: PI?,~r'FE$SIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 3301 E TAM1AMI TRAIL NAP[r~SI FI~ORIDA 34112 If't£ "°': I SHEET ..._OF 8 B 1 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 330i EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA ,34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION 25.00'- N.89'5 ,"01 "E. N.89'37'35"E. N.31 '14'46"W. - 9.65' 19.,30' 28.95' Twp. 49S Rge. 26E Twp. 49S Rge. 25E PA:~CEL 136 PARCEL 736 / E-.8 9-5-7'0'T"-'w. -- 10.00' LINE SEC. 36 P,B.B. 10.00' O O GENERAL NOTES l) P0.C. indicates Point oF Commencement 2) P.B.B. indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp, Indicates Township 5) Rge. indicates Range 6) R/W indicates Right-oF-way 7) Att distances ore in Peet amd decimals ther'eoF 8) Bosis oF ]~eorimgs is the West Righ'l; oF Woy tine oF l.lvimgston Rood bainD S.00'08'IS'E, 9) Not valid untess signed and seated with -t:he embossed seat oF the pr'oFessionat rand surveyor' THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH SCAI r 05-13-97 PR-736 SHEET 2 OF 2 LEGAL 8 B i 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA (941) 774-8192 54112 PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. TAX PARCEL NO, oo?67~q DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) fee simple title BEGIN AT TIlE POiNt OF INTERSECTION OF TIlE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF CX~)f,DE h' GATE, PARKWAY AND TI IR EAIliT I,INB OF TIlE ~ IIIA~IT (~)UAI~TER OF 'n-m. Nc-r..~OUTtl ~ F~.GRF;ES 22 M1NIJTES 1.1 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 25, A DISTANCE OF 2131.46 FEET TOTHE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE SOUTtl 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 01 SECOND WEST, A DISTANCE OF I0.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS W~ST, A DISTANCE OF 160.00 FEET TO THE NORTH LINE OF A I(,o FOOT CANAL EASEIVIENT; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH ALONG SAID LINE. A DISTANCE OF 20.05 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 45 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 5.56 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 96.61 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE TO 'Il-iR WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 6,X)5.46 FEET AND A CENTRAL. ANGLE OF 6 DEGREES 44 MTNUTES 44 SECONDS; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 812.99 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF ~9o5.46 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 DEGREES 44 I~S 44 SECONDS, AND A CHORD OF 812.52 FEET BEARING NORTH 3 DEGREES 44 MIN1JTES 35 SECONDS WEST; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF ~12.99 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 132.43 FEET: THENCE NORTH 45 DEGREES 16 MINUTES (10 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 84.49 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 700.71 FEET; THENCE NOR'IH 0 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 40.O0 FEET TO THE SOUTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GOLDEN G~,TE PARKWAY; THENCE NORTH ~9 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF ~59 44 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT COt',q'A]NING 140,3 i.l SQUARE FEET (3.22 ACRES), MORE OR LESS BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 25 BEING SOUTH iX) DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST ~G~J3.R'GE R': RICHMOND DATE: ~/~,,A'> DROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR j~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX .3501 E TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 33962 1~? OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .:.33962 (813) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION N.OO'29'42'W. /'/ 40.00' C, OLD£N GATE PARKWAY N.sg'50'18'E. 859.44' S,89'30'18'W. 700.71' 84.49' 132.43' P.D,B, PARCEL Radius = 6905.46' Z~ = 06°44'44· ^re = 018.99' Chord = 81~.5~' Chord ~r Curve number Rodtus = 6905.46' ~ = 06'44'44' ~rc = ~18.99' Chord = 8t2.52' Chopd B~g. C-2 Oz Z .-t 0 GENERAL NOTES t) P,D,C. indicctes Point of Commence~en~ 8) P,O.B. indicotes Point of Beginning :3) Sec. indico, tes Section 4) Twp. ~ndicotes Township 5) Rge, indicotes Ronge 6) R/~ indicotes Right-oF-woy 7) Alt distonces ore in Feet oncl decino, ts thereof 8) B~sis of Bettings is the Eost tine of sold Section 25 being S.O0°2P.']3'[. 9) Not v~lld unless signed ~nd seated with the embossed seot oF the proFessionol rand surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH NOT .... TO In-14-qK, t~D _ ~ -~ N.00'22'13'W. -X 96.61' $.89'55'45'E.--~5.56. ~X I N.OO'O2'IS'W.-,,, · /-Eost line $outheest 20.05' ~. x, \ 1 / Ouorte~ Sect. 10.00' $e~. 25, Twp. 49 $., Rge. 25 E. I RHFFT ? nF ') 3301 O??IC£ OF' CAPITAL PROJ'£CT$ EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO. (~ ~') ~ PROJECT PARCEL NO. TAX PARCEL NO. LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) .slope, utility & maintenance easement COMMENCING AT TIlE POINT OF INTERSECTION OFTIIE EAST LINE OF SEC~,ION 2.~ TOWNSIIIP 4'~ SOUT}! RANGE 25 EAST AND TIlE SOUTII RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GOI.DEN GATE PARKWAY; TIIENCE SOUTI I o DEGREES 22 MINU3~S 1.1 SECONDS EAST AI.¢)NG SAID EAST I.INE OF SECTION 25 A DISTANCE OF 232.6.3 FEET; THENCE SOUTI[ 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 47 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF ')9 ~gl FEET TO TIlE WEST RIG[IT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND TIlE POi.NY OF BEGIN"NING; SAID POINT BEING TIlE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE. CONCAVE TO TIlE EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 6905.46 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 44 SECONDS. AND A CHORD OF 812.52 FEET BEARING SOLqTI 3 DEGREF. S 44 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST; TIIENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CUR~32 AND SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 812.09 FEET TO TIlE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A REVERSE CURVE. CONCAVE TO TIlE WEST, IIAVING A RADIUS OF 6'm5 46 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 44 SECONDS. AND A CItORD OF 812.52 FEET BEARING sOLrFH 3 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 15 SECONDS EAST; TIIENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 8129') FEET; TIIENCE SOUTll 0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 96.61 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 45 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 576 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 20 05 FEET; TIIENCE LEAVING SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE. SOUTH ~,) DEGREES 37 M[NqJ3~S 32 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 19.32 FEET; TilENCE NORTII I! DEGREES 22 MINUTES 1.3 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 49.12 FEET; THENCE NORTH 4 DEGREES 07 MINUTES 04 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 124.76 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE. CONCAVE TO THE WEST. }lAVING A RADIUS OF 6890.46 FEET. A CENTRAl. ANGLE OF 6 DEGREES 16 MINLrTES 21 SECONDS, AND A CIIORD OF 75396 FEET BEARING NORTH 3 DEGREES 58 MINW37~S 47 SECONDS WEST; THENCE NORTll ALONG SAID CURVE. A DISTANCE OF 754.34 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE ()F A REVERSE CURVE. CONCAVE TO TIlE EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 6')2o.46 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 6 DEGREES 44 MINUTES 44 SECONDS, AND A CIIORD (DF 814.28 FEET BEARING NORTH'3 DEGREES 44 MINUTES .35 SECONDS WEST. THENCE NORTI! ALONG SA[b CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 814.75 FEET; THENCE NORTI! ~ DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 147.48 FEET. TItENCE SOL~FI! 45 DEGREES 16 MINU3~S em SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 21.25 FEET TO TIlE AFORESAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF [JVINGSTON ROAD; THENCE SOUTH () DEGREES 22 MINUTES I~1 SECONDS EASTALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 1~243 FEET TO THE PO[N~T OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING o 67! ACRE (29,248 SQUARE I EET). MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS TIlE EAST LINE OF AFORESAID SECTION 25 BEING SOUTH O0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST. OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 3301 E TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 33962 881 PROJECT NO. ~ OO PROJECT PARCEL NO. FOLIO NO. 0027! 240000 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope, utility & maintenance easement The East Ten (10) feet of the South 110 feet of the North 730 feet of the East 510 feet of the Northeast One Quarter (1/4) of Section 36, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. 110' BY.: Z ~ ate. Ge~f'ge R. Richmond, PLS 2406 Collier County Government Complex 3301 E Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Prol)osed T C E ' Pro!~osed 10' NE Corner Section 36 4--- FPL Easemenl PROPOSED SLOPE & UTILITY EASEMENT "-**- . 110' SKETCH NOTTO SCALE 8P,?j 92)7 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3501 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .35962 (813) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION 40.00' Rodlus = 690546' /~ = 0~.44,44· Arc = )')IP.99' Chord = 8]g. Sg' ChOrd Curve nu~e~ Rodlus = 6905~6' ~ = 06'44'44' ArC = 812,99' Chord : Chord Dr9, NOD'44'35'W. Radius = 692046' ~ = 06'44'44' A~C = 8~4.75' Chord = 8~4.~8' C~o~d ~g N.O3'44'35'W. CU~v~ nu~ 4 ArC : 7~4,34' Chord : Chord Brg /- P.D.C. COLDEN GATE PARKWAY / PARCEL N.89'SO'~8'E. 8s9.,,4' Z'--' 837 S. Bg'~o'~8'w. 7oo.7r ~ /~P.D,]B, N,45'I6'OO'w.-/ ~ ~ 56.~5' _ /11 ~/ N 00'22'1~"W.-/ II ~/ 147,48' N.O0~2*I 3"W. 152.45' 7'W. 99.00' PARCEL 937 124.76' ~., GENERAL NOTES I) P.O.C. indicotes Point oF CoMmenceMent P) F.O.B. indicoles Poin~c oF Beginning 3) Sec. indicotes Section 4) Twp. [ndicotes Township ~S) Rge. indicotes Ronge 6) R/~ indicotes Right-oF-woy 7) A([ distonces cxne in Feet Ond decimols ~hereoF ~ being S.00'22'i3'E. 9) Not volid unless signed ond seoted with the embossed seot or the p~oressio~ol [ond suPveyo~ N.O0'22'13"W. 96.61' S.89'55'45"E. 5.56' N.00'02'I8'w. 20.05' ~X~]i /Eost fine Southeo,, Quarle~ Sect. 25, ,.oo'22'~-w.-..~ '~\H/ T.P. 49 s.. R~,. ~s E. EASEMENT-~ J ~"S.89'37'32"W. --- '--~t~east Corner Sec. 2.5, Twp. 49 S., Rge. 25 THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO,, ~.00~/ PROJECT PARCEL NO. 13~ TAX PARCEL NO. 38100060000 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVI~'Y) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement BEGIN AT TIlE SOUTIIWEST CORNER OF TRACT I, OF TIlE PLAT THEREOF, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 29 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 57 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT i A DISTANCE OF 511.20 FEET., THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST ALONG TIlE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT I A DISTANCE OF 99.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE TOTHE WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 7684.44 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF I DEGREE 4.~ MINUTES 18 SECONDS. AND A CHORD OF 235.36 FEET BEARING SOD'tH 0 DEGREES 54 MINU'rES 56 SECONDS EAST; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 235.37 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 11600 FEET; THENCE NOR'Ill 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; TIIENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 02 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT I A DISTANCE OF 160.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTt189 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 35 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 110.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 54.004 SQUARE FEET ( 1.240 ACRES), MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS iS TIlE WEST LINE OF TRACT I BEING NORTH OO DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST. 'PARC'EL 138 PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ~2406 ~ OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS ~ OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA ,34112 (941) 774-8192 8 B SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION N.89'32'36"E. 99.36' b C-1 N.89',37'35"E, 10.00' IS.89'52'32"W. /// 11o.0o' Southwest Corner Tract 1 Curve number ] Radius = 7684.44' ~, = 01'45'18' Arc = 235.37' Chord = 235.36' Chord Brg. S.00'54'56'E. GENERAl_ NOTES I) P.O.C, indicates Point oF Commencement 2) P.O.B, ind!cates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec, indicates Section , 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge. indicates Range 6) R/~/ indicates Right-o£-way 7) All distances are in Feet and decimals %hereof 8) B~sis oF Beorings is the ~est line oF Tract ~ being N.00'22']3'~. 9) Not va[id unless signed cnd sealed with the enbossed seal oF 1he professional land surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH 881 3301 OPf'ICE Of' CAPITAL PROffECT$ EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. TAX PARCEL NO, ~Rlnnn~oflRN ,LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope, drainage, utility & maintenance easement COMMENCING AT Tile NORTIIWEST CORNER OF TRACT I OF THE PLAT THEREOF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 29 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7 PAGE $7 OF TIlE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH g9 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 99.36 FEET TO Tile POINT OF BEGINNING; TIIENCE CONTINUING EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 25OI FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE TO TIlE WEST. ttAVING A RADIUS OF 7709,44 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF o DEGREES 56 MINUTES 13 SECONDS, AND A CHORD OF 126.09 FEET BEARING SOUTII I DEGREE 19 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CURVE. A DISTANCE OF 126.o9 FEET; TIIENCE SOUTH $ DEGREES o? MINUTES 53 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 177.'/2 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2 DEGREES 24 M[NUTES 51 SECONDS EA ST. A DISTANCE OF 411.24 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 3.s SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 42.00 FEET; THENCE NORTtl o DEGREES {)2 MINtFrES I~1 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 116.00 FEET TO TI IE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A TANGENT CURV~. CONCAVE TO THE W~$T, IIAVING A RADIUS OF 76X4 44 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF I DEGREE 45 MINUTES IX SECONDS; TtlENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 2~537 FEET TO TIlE POINT .CF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 0 249 ACRE ¢IO.X44 SQUARE FEETI. MORE OR LESS. ,RICHMeND DATE: OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION ~ /P.O.:B. N.SO'32'52"E P.FI.C. / Northwest Corner Troct 1 99.56' C-1 luj N 89'57'35"E i ~z-- 42.00 /I ~ S.02'24'51"E. S.89'$2'32"W. I 110.00' I Curve number ! Radius = 7684.44' A = 01'45'18' Arc = 235.37' Chord = 235,36' Chord Br9, S,00'54'56'E. Curve number Radius = 7709.44' · /~ = 00'56'13' Arc = 126.09' Chord = 126.09' Chord Brg. S.88']2'40'V. GENERAL NOTES 1) P.O,C. indicates Point oF Commencement 2) P.O,B, indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec, indicates Section 4) Twp, Indicotes Township 5) Rge. indicates Range 6) R/W indicates Right-oF-way 7) All distances ore in Feet and decimals thereof 8) Basis oF Bearings is the West tine oF Tract l bein9 9) Not valid unless signed and seated with the embossed seat oF the proFessionaL land surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH 8131 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO.. ~ <~)~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. I'~ TAX PARCEL NO. 3~100120001 LEGAL DESCRIPTION {NOT A SURVEY'~ road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement BEGIN AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 2 OF THE PLAT THEREOF, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO, 29. AS RECORDED tN' PLAT BOOK, 7, PAGE 57, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. It,OR[DA; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES ] 3 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 A DISTANCE OF I$0.00 FEET; ~{ENCE NORTH 1{9 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST ALONG A LINE LYTNG IRO FEET SOUTH, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO, THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 A DISTANCE OF 94.17 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON.TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE WEST. HAVING A RADIUS OF 7684.44 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF I DEGREE 07 MINUTES 09 SECONDS, AND A CHORD OF 150.0R FEET BEARING SOUTH 2 DEGREES 21 MllqUTES 09 SECONDS EAST; THENCE .~;OUTt! ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF FEET; THENCE SOUTH ~9 DEGREES 32 MIN'UTES 32 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 A DISTANCE OF 99.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 14,5J2 SQUARE FEET (0.334 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT ;2 BEING NORTH (30 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST. PARCEL 139 BY' DATE: G¢,~E "R. 'RICHMOND ' PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 8 B 1 3301 O??IC£ O? CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA (941) 774-8192 34112 PROJECT NO. ~)~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. ~ ~(~ TAX PARCEL NO. '~t~nl ~nnnl LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope, drainage, utility & maintenance e~lsement COMMENCING AT TIlE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 2 OF THE PLAT THEREOF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES IJ~IT NO. 29 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK ?,PAGE 5? OF TI{E PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NOR'I'tt 89 DEGREES 32 MINt~TES 32 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 2 A DISTANCE OF 9936 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING 'HIE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 7694.44 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF I DEGREE 07 MINUTES 09 SECONDS. AND A CHORD OF I .~0.08 FEET BEARING NORTH 2 DEGREES 21 MINUTES 09 SECONDS WEST; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 150.0g FEET; THENCE NORTH 1~9 DEGREES 32 MINIJ'~S 32 SECONDS EAST ALONG A LINE LYING 15o FEET NORTH. AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO.THE SOLrT'H LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 A DISTANCE OF 40.04 FEET TO ThE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A RADffJS OF 7724.44 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 43 SECONDS, AND A CHORD OF 37.55 FEET BEARING SOUTH 2 DEGREES 45 ~S 37 SECONDS EAST; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 37.$5 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 2 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 19 SECO~S EAST, A DISTANCE OF 112..% FEET: TI~NCE SOLrD189 DEGREES 32 MINLrTES 32 SECONDS WEST ALONG TI I E SOU3 ]t LINE OF TRACr 2 A DISTANCE OF 40.57 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 6,019 SQUARE FEET (0.138 ACRE). MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 2 BEING NORTH 89 DRGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST. PARCEL 839 P~OFE$$1ONAL LAND SU~OR ~2406 OFF,CE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS · 8 B I OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3501 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .941 12 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION 0 0 rY 0 Z 0 Z N.89'32'32"E ,'~.. ~ 94.17' -P.E],B, 99.36' S.89'32'32"W. Curve number 1 Radius = 7GB4.44' A = 01'07'09' Arc = 150,08' Chord = 150,08' Chord Brg, S.02'21'09'E. GENERAL NOTES 1) P.O.C. ;ndicates Point o? Commencement: 2) P.O,B. indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge. indicates Range G) R/~V indicates Right-oF-way 7) All distances ore in Feet and decimals ~hereo? a) Basis oF Bearings is the ~est time o~ Tract 2 being H,00'22'13'~, 9) Not valP~ unless signed and sealed ~i~h the embossed seo[ of the professional Land surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH 8 B 1 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 5301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 BY: SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION 0 n O O O F N.89'32'32"E. 94.17' P,O,C, 99.36' S.89'32'32"W. 1 C-1 'I0'04' C-2 ..-I L,J ,,. - P,B,B, GENERAL NOTES I) P.B.C, indicates Point o¢ Commencement ;~) P,O,B, indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec, indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge, indicates Range 6) R/~/ indicates Right-oF-way 7) All distances are in Feet and decimals thereof 8) Basis oF Bearings is the South line oF Tract 2 being N.89'32'32'E, 9) Not valid unless signed and sealed with the embossed seat o£ the professional land surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH CHECKED NOT TO SCALE 10-15-96 PR-839 t Curve number 1 Radius = 7684,44' A = 01'07'09' Arc = 150,08' Chord = 150.08' Chord Br9. S.02'81'09'E. Curve number 2 Radius = 7724.44' A = 00'16'43' Arc = 37.55' Cho~'d = 37,55' Chord Brg. 2.02°45'37'E, S~2 OF2 8 B 1' 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA (941) 774-8192 34112 PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO., TAX PARCEL NO. ~Rinnn~RRfl7 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (~NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement BEGIN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 2 OF TH~ PLAT THEREOF, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, UNIT NO. 29 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 57 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 A DISTANCE OF R4.07 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 7684.44 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF I DEGREE 20 MINUTES 39 SECONDS, AND A CHORD OF 180.27 FEET BEARING SOUTH 3 DEGREES 35 MINUTES 03 SECONDS EAST; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 180.27 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST ALONG A LINE LYING 150 FEET NORTH, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO, THE SOUTH LINE OF TRACT 2 A DISTANCE OF 94.17 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 A DISTANCE OF I R0.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 16,105 SQUARE FEET (0.370 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 BEING NORTH O0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST. PARCEL 140 RICHMOND :DATE: 8 B 1 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 5301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 0 z 0 . SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION I/ P.EI,B, N.89'.~2'32"E. i 84.07' o 94.17' S.89'32'32"W. Curve number Radius = 7684.44' z~ = 0l'20'39' Arc = 180.27' Chord = 180,27' Chord Brg. S,03'35'03'E, DR~WN GENERAL HOTES 1) P.O,C. indicates Point oF Commencemen~ 2) P.O.]~. indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge, imdicotes Range G) R/~ indicates Right-oF-woy 7) All distances ore in Feet ~nd decimals ~hereo? 8) ~osis or ~eorings is ~he ~est line o? Troc~ 2 being N.00'22'13'~, 9) No~ v~lid un~ess signed ond sealed wi~h ~he embossed seol oF the pro?essionol lond surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH 881 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA (941) 774-8192 34112 PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. TAX PARCEL NO. 3~.'00.")~0002 .LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) .slope, drainage, utility & maintenance easement COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 2 OF TH~ PLAT THEREOF, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 29 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7 PAGE 57 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH R9 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 A DISTANCE OF g4.07 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 40.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 7724.44 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF I DEGREE 20 MINUTES 14 SECONDS, AND A CIIORD OF IS0.27 FEET BEARING SOUTH 3 DEGREES 34 MTN1JTES 05 SECONDS EAST: THENCE SOUTtl ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF lg0.27 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 3:2 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST ALONG A LrNE LYING 180 FEET SOUTH. AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAT TO, THE THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2 A DISTANCE OF 40.04 FEET TO THE POIN'r OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE. CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 76~4.44 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF I DEGREE 20 MINUTES 39 SECONDS, AND A CHORD OF 18027 FEET BEARING NORTtt 3 DEGREES 3:5 MINUTES 03 SECONDS WEST; THENCE NORTll ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF !~10.27 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING: SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 7,211 SQUARE FEET (0.166 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT2 BEING NORTH gO DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST. PARCEL ~40 OFFICE Or CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 3301 ~ TAMIAMI TRAIl NAPI.~, FLORIDA 3396? O~AWN BY: OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 33ol EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 n LLJ 0 n 0 n 0 0 I-o SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION i/-' P,E).C. N.89'52'32"E. 84.07' ///~ 40.09' P,D,B,-/ I 94,17' 40,04' S.89'32'32"W. C-2 Curve number 1 Radius = 7684.44' ~ = 01'20'39' Arc = 180.27' Chord = 180,27' Chord Brg. S.03'35'03'E. Curve number 2 Radius = 7724,44' A = 01'28'14' Arc = 180.27' Chord = ]B0.27' Chord Brg, S,O3'34'OS'E. GENERAL NDTES 1) P.E].C. indicates Point oF Commencement: 2) P.ELB. indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec, indicates Section 4) Twp. [ndicates Township 5) Rge. indicates Range 6) R/W indicates Right-oF-way 7) At( distances a~e in Feet and decima[s ~he~eo~ 8) Bosis oF Bearings is the North line oF Tract ~ being N.SD'28'28'E, 9) Not velid unless signed ~nd seQled with the embossed seQI oF the professional IQnd surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH I NET TIg .... ~ 8 B 1 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. TAX PARCEL NO. ~R!nn200002 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance ea.~em~.nt BEGIN AT 'HIE SOU.HIWEST CORNER OF TRACT 3 OF THE PLAT THEREOF, GOLDEN GATE.. ESTATES UNIT NO. 29 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7. PAGE 57. OF TltE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH O DEGREES 22 M1NUTES 13 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAI~ TRACT 3 A DISTANCE OF 165 0o FEET: THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST ALONG ALINE LYING 165 FEET NORTH, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO, ~ SOL[TI[ LINE OF SAID TRACT 3 A DISTANCE OF 7I .07 PEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 7684.44 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1 DEGREE 14 MINUTES 02 SECONDS, AND A CIIORD OF 165.49 FEET BEARING SOUTH 4 DEGREES 52 MIN-LrrEs 24 SECONDS EAST; 'HIENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 165.49 FEET; TIIENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 3 A DISTANCE OF 84.07 PEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 12,848 SQUARE FEET (0.295 ACRE). MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 3 BEING NORTH OO DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST. PARCEL 141 8 B 1 141 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION 0 0 0 Z 0 Z N.89'32'32"E. 71.07' ~- P,O,B, // 84.07' S.89'32'32'W. t-- o GENERAL NOTES 1) P.O.C. indicctes Point oF Commencement 2) P.0.B. indicotes Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp, Indicates Township 5) Rge. indicates Range 6) R/W indicates Right-oF-way 7) AU distances one in Fee~ 8) Bosis oF Beorings is the West Une oF Tract 3 being 9) Not volid unless signed end se~ted with the embossed seol oF the pnoressionol l~nd su~veyo~ Curve numbe~ ! Radius = 7684,44' A = 01'14'02' ArC = 165.49' Chord = 165.49' Chord Br0. S.04°52'24°E. THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH 881 LEGAL 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .34112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO. ~- ~'T;c-'~ .~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. ~- x~'l TAX PARCEL NO. '~lnn?nnnn~ DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVI~Y) slope, drainage, utiltty& maintenance easement COMMENCE AT SOUTI tWE. ST CORNER OF TRACT 3 OF TIlE PI.AT TI IEREOF. GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 29.AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7.PAGE 5? OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COI,LIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ', THENCE NOR'r[[ 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE SOUTI! LINE OF SAID TRACT 3 A DISTANCE OF g407 FEET TO TIlE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING TI [E BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE. CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 76R4.44 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF I DEGREE 14 MINUTES 02 SECONDS. AND A CHORD OF 165.49 FEET BEARING NORTH 4 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 24 SECONDS WEST; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF I65,49 FEET; TI[ENCE NORTH R9 DEGREES 32 MINt, FI'ES 32 SECONDS EAST ALONG A LINE LYING 165 FEET NORTH, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO, THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 3 A DISTANCE OF 40.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE. CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 7724.44 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF I DEGREE 13 MINI, rrEs 39 SECONDS, AND A CHORD OF 165.49 FEET BEARING SOUTH 4 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 01 SECOND EAST; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CURVE. A DISTANCE OF 165.49 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 32 MINLrTES 32 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 3 A DISTANCE OF 40.09 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 6.620 SQUARE FEET (0.152 ACRE), MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF I~EARINGS IS THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACI3 BEING NORTH 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST. PARCEL 841 GE~CE R. ~ICH~ONO ' O [SS O ,L t2aOS OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUN~ GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 8 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 5301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .94112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION r~ b.J 0 EL 0 F N.89'32'52"E. 71.07' C-2 Curve number 1 Radius = 7684.44' ~ = 01,14,02° Arc = 165.49' Chord = 165.49' Chord Brg. S.04'52'24'E. Curve number 2 Radius = 7724.44' A = 01.13,39° Arc = 165.49' Chord = 165,49' Chord Brg. S.04'51'01'E. /- P.O.C. 84.07' S. 89'52'32"W. ~ I ~ -P.D.B. (_~ · GENERAl_ NOTES l) P,B,C. indicates Point oF Commencement 2) P,E].B, indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge. indicates Range 6) R/W indicates Right-oF-way 7) All distances ore in Feet and decimals thereof 8) Basis oF Bearings is the South tine oF Tract :3 being N.89'32'32'E. 9) Not valid unless signed and seated with the embossed seat oF the professional land surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH 8 B 1 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA ,34112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO. ~006~ 1 PROJECT PARCEL NO, TAX PARCEL NO. 3~!no!600f~3 ,LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, uLil£ty, drainage & maintenance easement BEGIN AT THE NORTHn~rEST CORNER OF TRACT 3 OF THE PLAT THEREOF. GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 29 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 57, OF THE PLqBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 3 A DISTANCE OF 55.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE.. CONCAVE. TO THE EAST. HAVING A RADIUS OF :3855.88 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 59 SECONDS, AND A CHORD OF 57.19 FEET BEARING SOUTH 5 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 29 SECONDS EAST; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CURVE. A DISTANCE OF 57.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 7684.44 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 DEGREES 48 MINUTES 34 SECONDS, AND A CHORD OF 108.55 FEET BEARING SOUTI! 5 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 108.55 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST ALONG ALINE LYTNG 165 SOUTH, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO, THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 3 A DISTANCE OF 71.07 FEET: THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES I :~ SECONDS WEST ALONG TIlE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 3 A DISTANCE OF 165.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING I0,42 ! SQUARE FEET 0) 239 ACRE). MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 3 BEING NORTtt ~)o DEGREES 22 MI,Nq.ITES 13 SECONDS WEST. PARCEL ,~Y~G E~R. - RICI--IMOND PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX .3301 E TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .33962 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS .3301 EAST T^MIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .34112 (941) 774-8192 0 []_ 0 n~ n o Z 0 Z SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION P.O,B. ~ N.go'32'32"E. C 55.14' C-1 71.07' S.89'32'32"W. Curve number Radius = 3855.88' A = 00'50'59' Arc = 57.19' Chord = 57.19' Chord Brg, S.05'58'89'E, Curve number Radius = 7684.44' A = 00'48'33' Arc = 108.55' Chord = 108.55' Chord Brg. S,05'53'48'E, GENERAL NOTES I) P.O.C. indicates Point o? Commencement 2) P.O.B. indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge, indicates Range 6) R/W indicates Right-oF-way 7) All distances ore in Feet and declma[s thereof 8) Basis oF Bearings is the West line oF Tract 3 being 9) Not voUd unless signed and sealed with the embossed sea~ oF the proFessionat land surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH NOT. r^, TO~ t 10-~5-96 PR-148 SHEET 2 OF 2 8 B 1 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA ~4112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO. ~_/"Jd'3~ ! PROJECT PARCEL NO., <~'~--- TAX PARCEL NO. '~RlnnlF, nnn"{ LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope, drainage, utility & maintenance easement COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 3 OF THE PLAT THEREOF, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 29 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7,PAGE 57 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COLrNTY. FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 3, A DISTANCE OF 55.14 FEET TO TIlE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINbTNG EAST ALONG SAID LrNE, A DISTANCE OF 40. ! 5 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 3815.88 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 DEGREES 47 MI'NUTES 5 I SECONDS, AN'D A CHORD OF 53. I I FEET BEARING SOUTH 5 DEGREES 54 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 53. I I FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A REVERSE CURVE. CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 7724.44 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 08 SECONDS, AND A CHORD OF 112.(,4 FEET BEARING SOUTH 5 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 55 SECONDS EAST: THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 112.(:4 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST ALONG A LINE LYING 165 FEET. AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO.THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 3 A DISTANCE OF 40.15 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 7684.44 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 DEGREES 4t~ MINUTES 34 SECONDS, AND A CHORD OF 108.55 FEET BEARING NORTH 5 DEGREES 53 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 108.55 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A REVERSE CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 3855.88 FEET, A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 0 DEGREES 50 MINUTES 59 SECONDS, AND A CHORD OF 57.19 FEET BEARING NORTH 5 DEGREES 52 MINUTES 29 SECONDS WEST; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF 57.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 6,630 SQUARE FEET (0.152 ACRE). MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS 171'E NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 3 BEING NORTH 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST. PARCEL 842 ~OFESSI6'NAL LAND SURVEYOR J/2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX DRAWU I~: 8 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 5301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .34112 (941) 774-8192 EL 0 E~ 0 Z 0 Z SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION /~P,O,C. . N.89'32'32 E. 71.07' 40.15' C-1 hi C- C-4 40.15' C-3 S.89'32'32"W. Curve number Radius = 3855.88' /~ = 00'50'59' Arc = 57.]9' Chord = 57.19' Chord Brg. S,05'52'29'E, Curve number Radius = 7684.44' A = 00'48'33' Arc = 108.55' Chord = 108.55' Chord Brg. S.05'53'42'£. Curve number 3 Radius = 3815.88' A = 00'47'5]' Arc = 53.11' Chord = 53.ll' Chord Brg, S,05'54'11'F. Curve number 4 Radius = 7724.44' A = 00'50'08' Arc = 118.64' Chord = 118.64' Chord Brg, GENERAL NOTES I) P.O,C. indicotes Point oF Commencement 2) P.O,B. inclicotes Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp, Indicates Township 5) Rge, indicotes Ronge 6) R/W indicates Right-oF-way 7) Al( distances are in Feet end decimels thereof 8) Bosis oF Oeorings is the North line oF Troct 3 being N.89'38'38'E, 9) Not volid unless signed ~nd seQ[ed with the eMbOSSed seol oF t~,e proPessionol Iond surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH B 1 ICHECKED BY: , I SCALE: ~J~T TN IDATE: IFILE NO': I 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34-112 (94-1) 774-8192 LEGAL PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. TAX PARCEL NO.--3~!nng~l DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, util'ity, drainage & maintenance easement BEGIN AT THE SOUTIIWEST CORNER OF TRACT 4 OF TIlE PLAT TIIEREOF. GOLDEN GATE ESTATES,UNIT NO. 29. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK ? PAGE 57 OF TH~ PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA THENCE NORTH 1{9 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EASTALONG A LINE LYING 180 FEET SOUTH. AS MEASURED PERPENDICTULARTO. THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 4 A DISTANCE OF 44.75 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE. CONCAVE TO THE EAST. HAVING A RADIUS OF 3855.1{8 FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 03 SECONDS. AND A CHORD OF 150.34 FEET BEARING SOUTH 4 DEGREES IP MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CURVE. A DISTANCE OF 150.35 FEET: TItENCE SOUTH 1{9 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 4 A DISTANCE OF 55.14 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING ?,418 SQUARE FEET (o. 17o ACRE), MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS THE WEST LINE OF TRACT 4 BEING NORTH O0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST, PARCEL '4~ROFESSIONAL LAND SURVE"YOR ~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPU~× OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAILNAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 Z 0 P,O,]3, ----, Southwest Corner Tr0ct SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION N.sg'52'32"E. 44.75' I X 55.14' C-1 ~ S.89'32'32"W. Curve number Radius = 3855.88' /~ = 0P.14,03· ^r'c = 150.35' Chord = 150.34' Chord Br'g. S.04'19'58'E. GENERAL NCTES l) P.B.C, indicates Point oF Commencement 2) P,[].B. indicates Point of' Beginning :3) Sec, indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge. indicates Range 6) R/W indicates Right-oS-way 7) Alt distances ore in Feet and decimals thereof 8) Basis oF Bearings is the West line o¢ Tract 4 being N.OO'22't3'W. 9) Not valid unless signed and seated with the embossed seat oF the proFessionat land surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH DRA¥,N SHEET 2 OF 2 LEGAL , 881 3301 OF£IC£ OF CAPITAL PROJ£CT$ 'F_.AST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA (941) 774-8192 34112 DESCRIPTION ('NOT A SURVEY} PROJECT NO,_ ~:¢, 0 0 ~--', PROJECT PARCEL NO,., TAX PARCEL NO.~3 slope, drainage, utility & maintenance 'easement COMMENCE AT TIlE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 4 OF 'rile PLAT ' TItEREOF. GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 29. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOO~ 17. PAGES 90-91. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA; TIIENCE NORTll 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST ALONG A LINE LYING 150 FEET NORTtl. AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO. TIIE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 4 A DISTANCE OF .SS. ]4 FEET TO TILE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID POINT BEING THE BEGINNING OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE. CONCAVE TO THE EAST. tIAV]NG A R-&DIUS OF 3{{$$ 85 FEET. A CE~ ANGLE OF 2 DEGREES 14 MINUTES 03 SECONDS. AND A CHORD OF ]$0.34 FEET BEARING NORTH 4 DEGREES 19 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CURVE. A DISTANCE OF 15o35 FEET; THENCE NORTIi 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 40.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE. CONCAVE TO TILE EAST. HAVING A RADIUS OF 3g 15.8R FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2 DEGREES 15 MINUTES 28 SECONDS. AND A CIIORD OF 150.:}5 FEET BEARING SOUTtl 4 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST; THENCE SOUTtl ALONG SAID CURVE. A DISTANCE OF 150.36 FEET; THENCE SOUTII 89 DEGREES .32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 4 A DISTANCE OF 4o. 15 FEET TO TIlE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCPUBED TRACT CONTAINING 6.o14 SQUARE FEET (0.138 ACRE). MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS TIlE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 4 BEING NORTtt 89 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST. PARCEL 843 ~-~ROE R. RICHMOND DATE:- 'A2/~"? PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ,//2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLUER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX 3301 E TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 33962 8 B 1 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 5501 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 541 12 (941) 774-8192 0 Q_ 0 0 Z 0 P,O,C, -----,~, Southwest Corner Tract x SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION N.89'32'32"E. 44.75' 40.05' i/P,F1,B, S.89"32'32"W. Curve number 1 Radius = 3855.88' A = 02'14'03' Arc = 150.35' Chord = 150.34' Chord BrO. 204'19'58'E. Curve number 2 Radius = 3815.88' A = 02'15'28' Arc = 150.36' Chord = 150,35' Chord Brg. 2.04'22'24'E. GENERAL NDTES 1) P.D.C. indicaCes Poin'c oF Commencemen~ 2) P.D.B. indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge. indicates Range 6) R/W indicates Right-oF-way 7) All distances are in Feet and decimals thereo? 8) Basis oF Bearings is 'the North line oF Tract 4 being N.89'32'32OE. 9) Not varig untess signed cind seated with ~he embossed seal or the professional rand surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH LEGAL , 8 B 1 3301 OFFICE OI~ CAPITAL PROJ£CT$ EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA (941) 774-8192 34112 PROJECT NO, PROJECT PARCEL NO TAX PARCEL NO,_ 1R1OO240004 DESCRIPTION (_NOT A SURVEY) ;. road right-of-Day, side~valk, utili, ty, drainage & maintenance easement .B,E.G. IN AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 4 OF TIlE PLA]' TIIE~Fr3r. c~^rE EStAtES unit No. 2,,. As "~CORDED IN PLAT.OD,: 7..^GE ?C6i~¥3'~ .... ru,uc records o~ co~u~, coup. ~or,oa: T,~ce ~o.m mINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST ALONO Tile NOrl'il ElNE OF SAiD t~ 4 A ~e~n~ so~ ~ oe~RE~ ~ m~n~s ~o s~conos ~t: t, anc~ so~ ~o~ ~e~en'o~cu~,~ to. me no,t, un~ o~ sa~o ~a~ ~, o~st~c~ o, re~t: t,e~ce nor~ 0 oe~s ~ m~n~s ~ s~conos west ~o~ ~ w~st BASIS OF BEAPJNGS IS TIlE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 4 BEING NORTH O0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST. PARCEL 144 AL LAND SURVEYOR //2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROdECTS 8 1 144 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 5501 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 SKEFCH OF DESCRIPTION 0 O_ 0 EL © Z 0 I/ P,D.B, / N.89"32'32"E. 40.01' b 44.75' S.89'32'32"W. GENERAL NOTES 1) P.B,C, indicates Point oF Commencement 2) P.D.B, indicates Point oF 3eginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp, Indicates Township 5) Rge. indicates Range 6) R/W indicates Righ~-oF-way 7) AH distances a~e in Fee% amd decimals %he~eoF 8) Basis oF Bea~ings is %he Wes~ (ine oF T~oc% 4 being N,00'~q3'~, 9) No~ vaJid unless signed and sealed with the embossed sea[ oF 'the p~oFession~[ tend su~veyo~ Curve number l Radius = 3855.88' A = A~C = Chord : 180,06' Chor'd ]~r'g, THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH SHFFT ? or ? 8 B 1 3301 O??IC£ O? CAPITAL PROdg'CT$ EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope, PROJECT NO. ~ ~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. ~4~ TAX PARCEL NO ........ ~ ....... OO0~ drainage,utility & maintenance easement COMMENCE AT THE NORTHA~.ST CORNER OF TRACT 4 OF THE PLAT 'I3IEREOF, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 29,AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK I?,PAGES 90-91 OF TILE. PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR[DA; 'I3tENCE NORTH t~9 DEGREES 32 MINUTES :~2 SECONDS EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 4 A DISTANCE OF 40,01 FEET TO Tile POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING EAST ALONG SAID LINE. A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO TItE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, CONCAVE TO THE EAST. IIAV[NG A RADIUS OF 3glS.~g FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2 DEGREES 42 MINUTES 14 SECONDS. AND A CHORD OF IgO.06 FEET BEARING SOUTH i DEGREE 53 MINUTES 33 SECONDS EAST; THENCE SOUTH ALONG SAID CURVE. A DISTANCE OF IS0,07 FEET: THENCE SOUTH g9 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS WEST ALONG A LINE LYING I1~0 FEET SOUTH, AS MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO, THE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 4 A DISTANCE OF 40.05 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE. CONCAVE TO THE EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 3g.~5,gg FEET. A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 2 DEGREES 40 MINUTES 33 SECONDS, AND A CHORD OF 180.06 FEET BEARING NORTH ! DEGREE 52 MINI.rTES 40 SECONDS WEST; THENCE NORTH ALONG SAID CURVE, A DISTANCE OF Ili0.07 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 7,203 SQUARE FEET (0.165 ACRE~, MORE OR LESS, BASIS OF BEARINGS IS '/'HE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 4 BEING NORTH g9 DEGREES 32 MINUTES 32 SECONDS EAST, PARCEL g44 DATE: . OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX ,:3301 E TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA .35962 8 B 1 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION // P,FI.C, < / N.89'52'32"E. 40.01' i. 40.01' ~ I'-- / e / S.89'32'32"W. 0 I° b Curve number 1 Radius = 3855.88' Z~ = 02'40'33" Arc = 180.07' Chord : 180.06' Chor'd Brg, Curve number' 2 Radius = 3815,88' A = 02'42'14' Arc = 180,07' Chord = 180,06' Chord Br-g. S.0t°53'33'E. GENERAL NnTES I) P.E].C. indicates Point oF CoMMenceMent 2) P,O.B, indicates Point o¢ Beginning 3) Sec, i~dicotes Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge. i~dicotes Range 6) R/kC indicates Right-oF-way 7) Att dlstcinces are in Feet and deciMats ther'eo¢ 8) Basis oF Bearings is the North tine oF Tract 4 Ioein9 N.89'32'32'E. 9) Not vcitid untess signed c~nd seated with the embossed seat oF the proFession(it t(ind surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH SCALE 10-18-96 PR-844 SHEET 2 OF 2 8 B 1 3301 OIe?IC ' CAPITAL P£Od'£CT$ EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA (941) 774-8192 34112 .LEOAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) fee nimple PROJECT NO. (~ O0 ¢ / PROJECT PARCEl. NO. I,'~' TAX PARCEL NO, nn'~A71 ?nnn~ title COMMENCE AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND THE EAST LIN'E OF SECTION 25,TOWNSIfIP 49 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST, COLLIER' cou~'crY. FLORIDA: THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 1.1 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 441.80 FEET TO .HIE EAST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 25; THENCE SOU'Et[ ~9 DEGREES 4o MINUTES 53 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF IO5.oo FEET TO .HIE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND TIlE POINT OF BEGINNING; 'f HENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 392.13 FEET TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE WEST RIGtFF OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD AND THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTIt 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 827.00 FEET'_ TtFENCE LEAVING SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 0 DEGREES 29 MIN%rTES 42 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 40.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 767.09 FEET; THENCE NORTH 47 DEGREES 55 MINUTES 35 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 60.27 FEET; TI fENCE NOR'HI 0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 1 .t SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 312.17 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 01 SECOND WEST, A DISTANCE OF .~84.63 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 27 MINUTES 24 SECONDS EAST. A Df STANCE OF'I 5.00 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 01 SECOND EAST, A DISTANCE OF 594.69 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 48,034 SQUARE FEET fl. 103 ACRES). MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF PEARINGS IS THE NORTH RIG[Fr OF ,WAY LINE OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY BEING SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES lg SECONDS WEST. OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 5301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION N.Sg'2T24"£. 15.00' --~ N.OO'29'42'W.-, ,o. oo. \, 1 ~ ~ " Rg°. 25 E. N.47'55'35'£.~ so.~7' '-~ 8 s.~'~o'~'w. ~7.~' I - GOLDEN GA~ PARKWAY "' ~P.D,C. GENERAL NOTES 1) P,D,C, indicotes Point oF Commencement 8) P.FI.B, indicates Point o¢ Beginning 3) Sec, indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge. indicotes Range 6) R/V/ indicates Ri§h.t-o¢-way 7) Att dis'l:onces nr-e in Fee.t o, nd declmo, ls 'thereof 8) Basis oF Be~r',qgs is the North righ't o¢' wo, y line of' Go[den Ga&e Par'l<wa¥ being 9) Not vatid untess signed <:~nd seated wi.th .the embossed seat oF 'the pr'oFessiona[ to, nd surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .34112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO. ~/ PROJECT PARCEL NO. M7 TAX PARCEL NO. ~nlnn~Annn? .LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance ensement COMMENCING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE CENTERLINE OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD, SAID POINT OF COMMENCEMENT ALSO BEING THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT ?, OF T{ [E PLAT THEREOF GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 29 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7 PAGE 57 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLOR{DA; THENCE NORTH o DEGREES 22 MINUTES {3 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH ALONG SAID LINE AND Tile EAST RIGIIT OF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 39l. l I FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 16 MINUTES 0l SECOND WEST, A DISTANCE OF 23g.89 FEET. THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE NORTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES {g SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 16 MINUTES O! SECOND EAST, A DISTANCE OF 238.86 FEET; TIIENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 32{. 14 FEET; THENCE SOUTIt 45 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 58 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 63.57 FEET; I'HENCE NORTH g9 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 2')5.38 FEET; TtIENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 25.(~) FEET TO TIlE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WE. ST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGIFF OF WAY LINE, A D/STANCE'OF 360.43 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 0.508 ACRE (22.123 SQUARE FEET). MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS I'S THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY BEING SOUTH 89 DEGREES .t0 MINUTES IR SECONDS WEST. PARCEL 147 BY D~TE: GEj3~E R. RICHUOND PROFESSIONAL I.AND SURVEYOR ~2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX ,3301 E TAMIAbll TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 33962 8 B 1 OFFICE 0£ CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA ,34112 (941) 774-8192 D/~AWN BY: SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION N.89'30'18"E. 359.06' '¥ PARCEL 147 TRACT 7 /'-S.45'25'58"E. '/ 63.57' N. 89'30'18"E. 360.43' S.89'30'18"W. ~' GOLDEN CATE PARKWAY 295.38' ? GENERAL NDTES l) P.B,C. indicates Point oF Commencement 2) P,O,B. indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge. ~ndicates Range 6) R/W indicates Right-oFIway 7) Att distar~ces ar-e in Feet and decimals ther'eoF 8) Basis o¢' bearings is the No~th R/W line o¢ Golden Oc te Parkway being S.89'30'~8'W, 9) Not votia untess signed ond sealed with the embossed seal o¢ the P~O~essionQt I~nd su~veyo~ THIS IS ONLY A SK~CH 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 774-8192 PROJECT NO. ~ (~)~" / PROJECT PARCEL NO. g'~7 TAX P^RCa..0. · ....... .LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY.') slope, drainage, utility & maintenance easement COMMENCING AT TIlE POIh"r OF INTERSECTION OF TIlE CENTERLINE OF GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY AND TIlE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LiNE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD; THENCE NORTtt o DEGREES 22 MINUTES I ~l SECONDS WEST ALONG THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID LIVINGSTON ROAD, A DISTANCE OF 120.04 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST RIGIIT OF WAY LINE NORTH $19 DEGREES 37 MINUTES 47 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 2o.o¢! FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 32 I. 14 FEET; THENCE NORTH 0 DEGREES 16 MINUTES OI SECOND WEST, A DISTANCE OF 23g.$16 FEET; THENCE NORTH $19 DEGREES 30 MINUTES IS SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 40.{~) FEET; TIIENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 16 MINUTES Ol SECOND EAST, A DISTANCE OF 23~¢.81 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS EAST, A DISTANCE OF 361.19 FEET; THENCE NORTH 45 DEGREES 25 MINUTES 58 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 56.51 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 0.533 ACRE (23,200 SQUARE FEET). MORE OR I.ESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS IS TIlE EAST RIGIFF WAY LINE OF LIVINGSTON ROAD BEING NORTil I! DEGREES 22 MINUTES 13 SECONDS WEST. PARCEL $147 ~E: DATE,' F.~ORGE 'R RICHMOND PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR ff2406 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX OFFICE O? CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIl_ NAPLES, FLORIDA ,34112 (941) 774-8192 0 Z 0 Z N.89'57'4T'W. 20.00' P,FI,3, SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION P.O,C, ,. N.89"30'18"E. 'q .__ 4 m_ PARCEL 847 TRACT 7 -N.45'25'58"W. 56,51' .360.54' GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY b o GENERAL NBTES l) P.B.C, indicates Point oF Commencement 2) P.D.B, indicates Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. indicates Section 4) Twp. Indicates Township 5) Rge. indicates Range 6) R/V/ indicates Right-oF-way 7) Ail distances ar'e in Feet and dedmQIs ther'eo¢ 8) Bosis oF bea~ings is the East R/~/ line oF Livingston Rood being N.00°22']3°~/, 9) Not valid untess signed and seated with the embossed seal oF the pr'oFessional land sur'veyor' THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH 881 PROJECT NO. ~,~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. 14~ FOLIO NO. '~o.~8ooon SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement The North twenty-five (25) feet of the South seventy-five (75) feet of the West 150 feet of Tract 8, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 29, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 57, of the public records of Collier County, Florida, being a portion of the property described in that certain warranty deed recorded in Official Records Book 790, Page 1916, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. TRACT UNIT 29 SUBJECT Extsbng 10 S~dewafk Easement George R. Richmond, PLS-2406 Co'l'lie~ County Government; Complex 3301 E Tamiam'i 'Trail SKETCH NOT TO SCALE Naples, FL 34112 70r S~eet SW (30' ~ N J~ ' " I III I I I II I I I II IIIII I PROJECT NO. 60061 PARCEL NO. 149 Folio No, 38]0032000.5 LIVINGSTON ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY fee simple title Tract 6, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 29, according to the plat thereof, recorded in the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, in Plat Book 7, Page 57. PROJECT NO. ~'3r~3~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. 150 FOLIO NO. ~ ~n_n**00o8 · SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement The North twenty-five (25) feet of the Sooth seventy-five (?5) feet of the West 150 feet of the East 180 feet of Tract 8, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 29, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 57, of the public records of Collier County, Florida, being a portion of the property described in that certain warranty deed recorded in Official Records Book 790, Page 1914, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT Ex~ng 10' Ge~e'R, RJchmonO, PLS 2406 C°l~er County Governmeng Complex 3301 E. Tamiami Trail HepIes, Fi 34112 SKETCH NOTTO S~ ?~ $~eet Sw (30' N' ' 881 3301 OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROffECT$ EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 (941) 7'/4-8192 PROJECT NO. ~O~.~l PROJECT PARCEL NO, I ~ ~, TAX PARCEL NO. ~!o2nsno~0 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road righ[-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & mnintennnce easement COMMENCE AT 'l'ttE NORTHWEST CORNER OF ]'RAG 25 OF TIlE PLAT TIIEREOF. GOI,DEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 29.AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7.PAGE 57 OF 1'lie PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA .THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINtFFES 18 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 3o.00 FEET~ TllENCE SOUTH 0 DEGREES 29 MINUTES 42 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 50.1n~ FEET TO Tile IY)INT OF BEGINNING: THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 3o MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 150 ~n~ FEET: THENCE SOUTlt 0 DEGREES 29 MINLITES 42 SECONDS EAST. A DISTANCE OF 20.~n~ FEET; TIIENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 18 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 125.00 FEET: TIIENCE SOUTH 5o DEGREES 5o MINUTES 43 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 32.02 FEET; TtlENCE NORTll o DEGREES 29 MINUTES 42 SECONDS WEST. A DISTANCE OF 40.o0 FEET TO TIlE POINT OF BEGINNING: SAID DESCRIBED TRACT CONTAINING 3.250 SQUARE FEET (o,075 ACRE). MORE OR LESS. BASIS OF BEARINGS.IS TIlE NORTH LINE OF SAID TRACT 2:~ BEING NOR'Itl 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 18 SECONDS EAST. PARCEL 151 PROFE$$1I~N~ LAND SURVEYOR J~2406 OFFICE or CAPITAL PROJECTS COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT COMPLEX OFFICE OF CAPITAL PROJECTS 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES, FLORIDA .34112 (941) 774-8192 SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION / Troct 25 P,R,C,-~ North Line GOLDEN GATE PARKWAY/ ~ .... / N.89'3o'~8'E. ~so. oo I , ~ ' 150.00' o PARCEL 151 /-- S.89'30'18"W. 125.00' S.00'29'42"E. ' 20.00' S.50'50'43"W. 32.02' TRACT 25 - / East Line Tract 25 West Line Troct 2.5 GENERAL NOTES 1) P.E1.C. indicates Point oF Commencement: 2) P.B.9. indi¢otes Point oF Beginning 3) Sec. indica'~es Sec'cion 4) Twp. InciicaZes Township 5) Rcje. i~dic~tes R~nge 6) R/W indicates Right-oF-way 7) Ali distomces 6r'e in Cee1; omd decimets ther'eoF 8) Basis oF Bearings is the North line oF Troc'l; 85 bein9 N,39'30'IS'E, 9) Not vc~tid unless signed ond se(~led with the embossed seot o¢ tine pr'oFessionat tQmd surveyor THIS IS ONLY A SKETCH 10-16-96 PR-151 SHEET 2 OF 2 PROJECT NO. ~a(PO~,/ PROJECT PARCEL NO. FOLIO NO. 3~ ,. 02 ,. 20999 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement The South twenty (20) feet of the North seventy (70) feet of the East 150 feet of Tract 25, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 29, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 57, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. SUBJECT (20') 3.301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 Exisl~g 50 foot p~atted right-of.way ~ ,, .,...._,...- i:'.::.':,:~ EAST 150' OF TRACT 25 GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 29 SKETCH NOT TO SCALE N PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. FOLIO NO. SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement The West twenty (20) feet of the South One Half (1/2) of Tract 9, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 29, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 57, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. Exis~ng 30 fo~! drainage Easement (by plat) TRACT 9, GO[DEl' I GATE ESTATES ' UNIT ~ 3. 29 ; SUBJECT : (zoo. st) , 3301 E TAMIAM! TRA:L NAPLES. FLORIDA 3-1112 N SKETCH NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NO. ~ (~O~ PROJECT PARCEL NO. FOLIO NO. 38100520009 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope, drainage, utility & maintenance easement The East forty (40) feet of the West sixty (60) feet of the South One Half (1/2) of Tract 9, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 29, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 57, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. Ex=~ng 30 foot drainage Easemen! (by plat) 40' 20' SUBJECT TRACT 9. GOLDEI UNIT GATE ESTATES (70TM SL) ~ G~r~RGE R. RICHMOND P.LS. 2406 3301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 N SKETCH NOT TO SCALE PROJECT NO. ,~ (P(::)~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. ~ FOLIO NO. 38!oo56ooo~. SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement The West twenty (20) feet of the North One Half (1/2) of Tract 9, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 29, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 57, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. 20' - Exi~bng 30 fOOl drainage easement (by plat) I SUBJECT TRACT 9, ~! UNIT IGATE ESTATES 0.29 30' PJW (70TM St) B'z,~.;~ , .' ./f'z~..,c~..~ ....... DATE, GEORGE R, RICHMOND P.L.S. 2406 33Ol E, TAMIAMi TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 N SKETCH NOT TO SCALE 8 B 11 PROJECT NO. ~~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. FOLIO NO. SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope, drainage, utility & maintenance easement The East forty (40) feet of the West sixty (60) feet of the North One Half (1/2) of Tract 9, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 29, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 57, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. 20' '--~ I.; '"4 - H: ",.~ SUBJECT (40') · ~ TRACT 9, GOI.DEI UNffl~ 3.29 Existing 30 foot drainage ~, 4 - easement Iby plat) E R. RICHMOND P.L.S. 33{)I E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 GATE ESTATES 30' R/W C/O~" Stl SKETCH NOT TO SCALE 8 B 11 PROJECT NO. ~,'"~--=----'~ PROJECT PARCEL NO. FOLIO NO. SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement The West twenty (20) feet of the South One Half (112) of Tract 10, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 29, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 57, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. Exist~ 30 fo~l (~rmnage Easemen! !by p~at) 20' . SUBJECT TRACT 10_ C~}LOEN GATE F_STATE~ ' UNIT NO. ~ 3~PJW {?0TM St) 3301 F TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 SKETCH NOT TO SCALE 8 B 1i PROJECT NO. ~ ~)d;) PROJECT PARCEL NO. FOLIO NO. 3~!00720003 SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope, drainage, utility & maintenance easement The East forty (40) feet of the West sixty (60) feet of the South One Half (1/2) of Tract 10, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 29, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 57, of the public records of Collier County, Flodda. Exislmg 30 foot drainage Easernenl (bt plal) ! 4 330' E. TAMIAM! TRAIl, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112 SKETCH NOT TO SCALE N 8 B 1 PROJECT NO. PROJECT PARCEL NO. /,.5 7 FOLIO NO. SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easement The West twenty (20) feet of the Nodh One Half (1/2) of Tract 10, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 29, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 57, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. Exis~ng ~0 foo! drainage Easement (by p~al) "' , ,. SUBJECT (20') ',V TRACT 10, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 29 (70TM St) GEORGE R. RICHMOND P.LS. 2406 3301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 .N SKETCH NOT TO SCALE 8 B 1.,' PROJECT NO. ~ ~)~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. ~57 FOLIO NO. SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) slope, drainage, utility & maintenance easement The East forty (40) feet of the West sixty (60) feet of the North One Half (1/2) of Tract 10, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 29, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat BooK:7, Page 57, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. Existing 30 foot drainage easement (by plat) 20' - SUBJECT (40') TRACT 10, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNIT NO. 29 30' R/W (70TM St) BYe,.. ~'./(~"../..~./...-~. ~ ............ DATE.~./(?., .~,':~?) G~RGE R. RICHMOND P. LS. 2406 3301 E. TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 /V SKETCH NOT TOSCALE PROJECT NO. 8 B 1 ~,00'~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. ~ FOLIO NO. 38]oo76oobs SKETCH & LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY) road right-of-way, sidewalk, utility, drainage & maintenance easem The West twenty (20) feet of the South One Half (1/2) of Tract 11, Golden Gate Estate~ Unit No. 29, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 57, of the ii public records of Collier County, Florida. nt Existin~ 30 Ioo! drainage Easemen[ (by plal) 30' RJW (?0T" St.) ~/~_/~ ~.-~.._,,:". ................. ~^~..~.~.~ GEORGE R. RICHMOND PkS. 2406 3301 E. TAMIAMI TI~.AIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 SKETCH NOT TO SCALE /V 8 B PROJECT NO. t'~O~ / PROJECT PARCEL NO. _,~._.~ FOLIO NO. .~ , , ,., ,, -, ,. ,, .... L SKETCH 8, LEGAL DESCRIPTION (NOT A SURVEY') slope, drainage, utility & maintenance easement ~ The East forty (40) feet of the West sixty (60) feet of the South One Half (1/2) of Tract 11, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 29, according to the plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 57, of the public records of Collier County, Florida. Ex~sbng 30 fool dra~na.~e Easement (by pta:) 20' I, 4  UNIT NO. ~ SUBJECT (40') J (70*" St) , '""'~ ~'z~.,~ ('/ 4., / GEmGE R. RICHMOND P.L.S. 2406 3301 E TAMIAMI TRAIL NAPLES. FLORIDA 34112 N SKETCH NOT TO SCALE RESOLUTION NO. 98- 30 RESOLUTION NO. CWS-98..1 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION BY GIFT, PURCHASE OR CONDEMNATION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENTS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF WATER WELL SITES REQUIRED FOR THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT'S NORTit COI.I.IER REGIONAL WATER TREATMENT PLANT EXPANSION PROJECT. WI tEREAS, on April 1 I, 1995, the Board of County Commissioners as the Governing Body of Collier County and as Ex-Officio the Governing Board of the Collier County Water-Sewer District of Collier County, Florida (the "Board"), authorized staffto proceed with the expansion plans; and the Board entered into an engineering contract with Metcalfand Eddy, Inc., to provide the professional services related to an eight million gallon per day (8-MGD} expansion and associated improvements to thc North Collier Regional Water Treatment Plant; and WHEREAS, thc improvements are consistent CIE 859 and CIE 865, North Collier Regional Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project to meet the increasing demands in the north service area of the County; and WHEREAS, thc Board of County Commissioners, on January 9, 1996, adopted Resolution No. %-13, Resolution No. CWS-96-i authorizing the County Staff to acquire by gift, purchase or condemnation certain easements required and necessary for the construction of water pipeline and water well sites for the North Collier Regional Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project; and NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS- SIONERS OF COL L! ER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER COUNTY AND AS EX-OFFICIO THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER-SEWER DISTRICT, that it has been determined by the Board that the construction ofthe water ~vells for the North Collier Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project (hereinafter referred to as the "Project") is necessary and in the Public's best interest in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of Collier County. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board has reviewed the Staffanalysis regarding alternative location, environmental factors, cost variables, safety and welfare consideration as they relate to the consmxction of the Project and finds that the most feasible location for the certain temporary construc'~ion easements arc described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein. 8 2 AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the construction and maintenance of the utility improvcmcnIs for thc water well facilities arc compatible with the long range planning goals and objectives o£ thc Collier County Water-Sewer District. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that to implement said construction ortho Project it is appropfiatc and necessary for thc Board to acquirc a certain temporary construction casements described in the attached Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein, which arc necessary for the construction o£ the water wells for the North Collier Regional Water Treatment Plant Expansion Project. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that the County staffis hereby authorized to immediately acquire by gift, purchase or condemnation in accordance with the provisions of Chapters 73, 74 and 27, Florida Statutes, thc certain temporary construction easements being more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein. AND IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED that no mobile homes are located on the property sought to bc acquired and thcrc£orc it will not be necessary to remove any mobile homes from the property to bc acquired. This Resolution adopted on this second and majority vote. , i 998, after motion, ATTEST: , DWI~3HT E. BROCK.'CLERK Approved as to form and regal sufficiency: By: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS THE GOVERNING BODY OF COLLIER AND AS EX-OFFICIO THE. GOVERNING BOARD OF THE COLLIER COUNTY WATER- SEWER DISTRICT : BAI~BAI~ B. aEP~/~ . A PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS ALL THAT PART OF SECTION .15, TOV/NSHIP 48 SOUTH. RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS F'OLLOW~; COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CCRNER OF' TRACT I28, UNiT 3, GOLDEN GA~TE ESTATES, PLAT BOOK 4. PAGE 77, THENCE N 00'44'00' E A DISTANCE OF' 60400 FEET: THENCE S B916'00' E A DISTANCE OF' I0.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING Of' THE EASEMENT HEREIN BEING DESCRIBED: THENCE S 8976'00° E A DISTANCE OF' 15.00 FEET: THENCE N 00'44'00° E A DISTANCE 01:35.00 FEET; THENCE N 89'16'00' W A OISTANCE OF' .,15.00 FEET; THENCE S 00'44'00" W A DISTANCE OF' 15.00 FEET: THEtICE S 89'16'00' E A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET: THENCE S 00'44'C0° W A DISTANCE GF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BE~NNING OF THE EASEMENT HEREIN DESCRIBED: ACRE OF LAND t~ORE OR LESS: ANO RESTRICTIONS C~ RECORD. P.L.S. 4.590 SEC~ON 35 T48S R2EE TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION iS.00 '~1"~ EASE~E,T · 20. yP.O.C. NORTHWEST CORNER T'PACT 128 128 NOT A SURV£Y fcr: project. N.C.R.W.T.P. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ~ EXPANSION title: SKETCH & DESCRIPTION OF' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT date: AUGUST 3. 1995 scale: Ibook: I' - 30' jpage: projec[ I atari: 5~65-E no.: 7086 / tach: 7086_ ACOUIR~ AS A T~PO~Y CONS~U~I~ PR~ PAR~ ~SE~NT DESCRIP~ON ~ ~MPOR~RY C~S~UC~ON~EN~0207920006 A PROPOS~D ~MPORARY CON~UC~ON ~A~M~NT O~,. UNO~R ANO ACROS~ ~LL ~AT P~RT O~ '~C~ON ~6. TO~H,P 48 ~OU~. RAN~ 26 ~A~T. COLLIER COUN~. ~ORIDA. ~NG MOR~ PAR~LAR~Y D~IBED AS ~O~O~; CO'MEN'NO AT ~ N~T CORN~R O~ ~ACT ,~. UNIT,. GOLDEN GA~ GUY P. AD~MS ~ ' P.L.S. 4JgO 5EC~ON 56 T48S R26E 89'16'00'W ~ ~MPORARY ~ N -- CON~UCnON  EA~E~E~r JS.00 NOR~ST CORNER ~r ~CT 17 17 NOT A SURV£Y 16 (or: I ' ' COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA project. N.C.R.W. T.P. WELL EXPANSION title: SKETCH & 'DESCRIPTION OF' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT IIII 2 7O2 dote: A UC, US T scofe: tbook: ! 1' - 50' Ipoge:, project Iocod:!516$_E~' no.: 7086 I tech~ 7086 ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~.: 703 DES~IP~ O~ ~MPORARY C~UC~ON EAS~M~T ~ ~206360005 A PROPOSED ~PORARY CONS~UC~ON ~AS~ENT 0~, UHD~ AND A~OS~ ALL ~AT PART OF SEC~ON 56, TO,SHiP 48 ~OU~, RAN~ 26 ~A~T, COLUER COUNt, ~CRIDA, B~NG MORE P~~RLY DES~IB~ AS F~O~: COMMEN~NG AT ~E NOR~ST CCRN~ O~ ~ACT 49, UNIT 6, ESTA~S, P~T BOOK 4, PAGE 93. ~N~ N 00'44'00' E A OISTAN~ OF 60.00 ~ET; ~CE S 89~6'00' E A DIST~ OF 25.00 ~ET TO ~E P~NT EEG'NNING ~ ~E ~T H~N ~NG ~ENCE S 89~6'00' E A DISTAN~ ~ rS.00 ~CE N ~'44'00' E.A DISTAN~ ~ 60.00 ~E~ ~ N 89~6'00~ W A DIST~ OF 65.00 ~ ~CE S 00'44'00' W A DIST~ ~ 15.00 ~T; ~ENCE S 8916'00' E A DIST~ OF 50.~ ~ET; ~CE S 00'44'00' W A DIST~ ~ 45.00 ~ET TO ~E BEGNNINC OF ~E EAS~ENT H~DN DES~IB~; CONTAININC 0.038 OF AN A~E OF LAND MORE OR LESS; SUB,CT TO EASEM~TS AND RES~IC~S OF RECORD. ARIEL R. AL VAREZ 0 SEC~lCN 36 T485 R26E c~ 48 P.LS. 5358  TEMPORARY CONS TRUC ~ON ? N 89'1a'OO'W EASEMENT o° r' 65. C0 ~-L ....... Sc. co ~, I IFaD $ eg'~'OO'E ~,.. I I I S 89'~6'00'E xP.O.C. HOR TH~,EST CORNER n~' ~CT 49 49 NOT A SURVEY COLLIER COUI',~TY, F'LGRIDA ~ ~project: fl.C.R.W.T.P. ~,E'I..L EXPANSION SKETCH & DESCRIPTION OF' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT II'~l~ AUGUST 22. 199S llal ° scale: book: page: acad:. 5t~3-£ tach: 7086 8 80 PRQ3E~ ~ taD.: 7048 t'OT./'O = 00208120009 DESCRIPTION ~ ~MPORARY CONS~UC~ON EA~ENT PROPOSED ~MPORARY CONS~UC~ON EASEMENT O~R, UNDER ~ND ACROSS ~LL ~AT PART ~ SEC~ 56, TO.SHIP 48 SOU~. RANGE 26 EAST. C~LIER COUNt, ~ORIDA. BEING MORE PAR~CU~RLY DESPISED AS COMMENONG AT ~E NOR~ST CORNER OF ~ACT ESTA~S, P~T 8~K 4, PA~ 95. '~EN~ N 00'44'00' E A DISTANCE OF ~0.00 ~ET; ~CE.S ~9~6'00' E A ~STAN~ OF BECINNING OF ~E EA~T HER~ 8~NG DE~I~ED; ~E~CE S ag~6'O0' E A DISTAN~ ~ 15.~ ~; ~CE N 00'44'00'* E A .OISTAN~ OF 35.00 ~C~ N 8~16'00' W A O~STANCE' ~ 35.00 ~ET; ~ENC~ S 00'44'00' W A Of STANCE OF ~5.00 ~ET; ~ENCE S 8~'00' ~ A DISTANCE OF 20.00 ~ENC~ S 00"44'00' W A OISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO ~ POINT OF BEGINNING OF ~E EASEMENT H~N DESCRIBED; CONTAININQ O. 01g O~AN ACRE C~ LAND MORE OR LESS; SECn~N 36 T48S R26E TEMPORARY CONS~UC~ON _ ~ 20.00 I. ~OR~ST CORNER nF ~ACT 81 NOT A SURVEY for: Iprojact: N.C.R.W.T.P. COLUER COUNTY, FLORIOA WELl. EXPANSION title: SKETCH & DESCRIPTION OF' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASET~ENT IllllR llll~ III-"I sou Bill Profentonll englneem, plinnem. & lind date: AUGUST 3. 1995 scale: 1' ,., 30° jpacje: project lacad: 5163- no.: 70~' 1 ~,,~- 70E~ ~L,-t "ri Y CONSTRUCTIO I'T E, A _; .0.: 70*: A PROPOSED ~MPORARY C~STRUC~ON EASEMENT O~R, UNDER AND ACROSS ALL ~AT PART OF $EC~ 36, TO~HIP 48 ~OU~, RANGE 2~ EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, ~ORIDA, BEING MORE PAR~CU~RLY DES~8ED AS COMMEN~NG AT ~ NOR~ST CORNER OF ~ACT 113, UNIT ~, GOLDEN GA~ ESTA~S. P~T BOOK 4, PACE g3, ~EN~ N 00'44'00' E A DISTANCE OF 60.00 FEET; ~ENCE ~ ~g~6*O0' ~ A DISTANCE ~E~NNING OF ~E EASEMENT HEREIN B~NG DESCRIBe; ~ENCE S ~9~6'00' E A DISTANCE ~ ~.00 ~ET: ~ENCE N 00'4~'00' E A DtSTAN~ Or 35.00 ~ET: ~ENCE N ~9~6'00' W A DISTANCE OF J~.O0 ~ET: ~ENCE S 00'44'00' W A DISTAN~ OF 15.00 ~ET: ~ENCE S 89~6'00' E A DISTANCE OF 20.00 ~ET; ~ENCE S 00'44'00' W A OISTAN~ OF 20.~ FEET TO ~E POINT OF BE~NNfNG CF ~E EA~ENT HEREIN OES~IBED: ~. CONTAIN~I~ 0.019 OF ~N ACRE OF LANO MORE OR LESS: CUY P. /ADAM~ ~ P.L.5. 4390 SECTION 36 T48S R26E N Bg'I6'OO'W /" TEMPORARY $5. C,0 / CONSTRUCllON ~ ~ r ..... ~,.. EA SEMEN T m 20.00 i I.., ,~ P.O.C. NC, RTHW'EST CORNER 11,3 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA title: NOT A SURVEY Ioroject:N.C.R.W.T.P. WEU. EXPANSION SKETCH & DESCRIPTION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT date:AUGUST 3, 995 I jscale: J i, "" Jo' J project J ocad: 5t65-! 8 S 2 tq:rt~O: 00219400103 DESCRIPTION OF' T~MPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 706A A PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS ALL THAT P,~RT OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH. RANC~ 27 EAST. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS F'OLLOW~; COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 17. UNIT 7. GOLDEN GATE ESTATES. PLAT BOOK 4. PAGE 95: THENCE N 87-07'40° E A DISTANCE OF I0.00 FEET TO THE PGINT OF BEGINNING OF THE EASEMENT HEREIN BEING DESCRIBED: THENCE CONTINUE N 87-07'40' E A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE N 02'52'20° W A O/STANCE OF .35.00 FEET; THENCE S 87'07'40' W A OISTANCE OF 35.00 FEET: THENCE S 02'52'20' E A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET: .~ THENCE N 87'07'40' E A OISTANCE OF' 20.00 FEET; THENCE S 02'52'20' E A OISTANCE OF' 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING GF THE EASEMENT HEREIN OESCRIEED: CONTAINII¥1~IO. OIg.O~ AN ,aCRE DF LAND MORE OR LESS: SU~JECT,~ EAS~I, TS ,NO RES~,CnONS O~ ~ECO~D. / SEC TIGN J ! T485 R27E /- TEMPORARY ~u S 87'07'aO'W / ~ JS. O0 Z CONSmUC~ON ~ ~ ..... ~. ~ EASEMENT I~O ~1 I P.O.C. ~ ' NOR ~S T CORNER 17 or m~Cr ~ for: COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA Urge: SKETCH & DESCRIPTION NOT A SURVEY IProject: N.C.R.W.T.P. WELL EXPANSION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EAS, EMEI~ Idate:,aUGUST J. 1995 Iscele: project , ~.~., ,..,., ~ 1 .... '--IT'--i .... ~ ........ IIIII IIIII .... 8 ~TO: ~219400103 7069 OESCRIPTION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT A PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OVER. UNOER AND ACROSS ALL THAT PART OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST. COLLIER COUNT'Y, r"LORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER DF' TRACT 49. UNIT 7, GOLDEN GATE EST/ATES, PLAT BOOK 4. PAGE 95; THENCE N 87'07'40' E A DISTANCE OF' 25.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF' BEGINNING OF THE EASEMENT HEREIN BEING OESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE N 87'07'40' E A DISTANCE CF 15.00 FEET; THENCE N 02'52'20' Fi' A OISTANCE OF 80.00 FEET: THENCE S 87'07'40' W A DISTANCE OF 65.00 FEET: THENCE S 02-52'20' E A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE N 87'0?'40° E A DISTANCE OF 50.00 FEET: THENCE S 02'52°20' E A OISTANCE OF' 45.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF' BEG;NNING OF THE EASEMENT HEREIN DESCRIgED; CONTAINING 0.038 C,F AN ACRE DF LAND MORE OR LESS; SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTICNS OF' RECORD. ARIEL R. ALVAREZ P.L.S. 5.158 SECTION Jl T,8S w/TEMPORARY R27E S 87'07'40' CONSTRUCTION EA SEMEN T ~.oo ../__- u~ N 87'07'40"E ~ I ~n I  ~O0_J N 87'07'40"E ~.J1~25.00 ~-P.O.~. p. OC. ·" , ,~ ] .~ ~ NORTHWEST CORNER ~'~ I zi'::f OF TRACT 4g COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA UUe:SKETCH & DESCRIPTION NOT A SURVEY Iproject: N.C.R.W.T.P. WELL EXPANSION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEM£t I°Te:AUGUST 22. l~gg5 $cole: book: 1' ,. 30' pa~e: project at'od: 5 I~ no,: 7088 i tech: 7( ~ o~~crl ~ ~ ~ t~o.: ?06C t'~,,TO: 00219400103 DESCR~P~ ~ ~MPORARY CONS~UC~ON EASEMENT A PROPOSED ~P~ARY CONS~UC~ EASEMENT O~R, UNDER AND ACROSS ALL ~AT PART OF SEC~ON ~1, TO~IP 48 SOU~. RAN~ 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, ~ORIDA, B~NG ~ORE PAR~RLY DES~I~ED AS F~O~; COUUENONG AT ~E NOR~ST CORN~ OF ~ACT 8I. ~T 7, G~EN GA~ ESTAES, P~T BO~ 4. PACE 95; ~EH~ N 87~7'40' E A D~STAN~ ~ ~0.00 ~ET TO ~E POINT OF BE~NNING OF ~E EAS~ENT HER~N B~NG DES~IBED: ~ENCE CON,NUB N 8~7'40' E A OISTAN~ OF 15.~ ~ET; ~ENCE N 02~2'20' W A DISTANCE ~ 35.00 FEET: ~ENCE S 87~7'40' W A DISTAN~ ~ 35.00 ~ET: ~ENCE S 02~2'20' E A O~STANCE ~ ~5.00 ~ET; ~ENCE N 87~7'40' E A O;STANCE ~ 20.00 ~ET: ~ENCE S 02~2'20' E A DISTANCE ~ 20.00 FEET TO ~E POINT OF BEGINNING OF ~E EASEMENT HEREIN DESCRIBED: CONTAINI~, 0.019 OF AN ACRE OF LAND MORE OR LESS: ~B~CT~ EAr,T, ~NO RE,~,C~ON~ O~ RECORD. I SECTION $1 T48S R27E S 87'07'40'W/ TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ,~ -- _35.~00_ -- ~ EASEMENT oc~r ' ~1 .... i z N a?~'4o'E ~~.0.8. P o.c.-/ I · _ I _. NGRTHWEST CORNER 80 I 81 '~r r~Acr el I NOT A SURVEY COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA Ipro~¢t: N.C.R.W. T.P. I WELL EXPANSION tiue: SKETCH &: DESCRIPTION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMEN I date:AUCUST ,3, 1995 sc~:: . [bock: 1 = 30 1page: t w ---- . - I. II.J. ...... II _-E--- II I I II IIIm~l 8 B 2 ~-~:~J~-k: i'~ocX? l~3.~P~t,~.: t'~t,~: 00219400103 70GD DESCRIPTION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT A PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTIOfl EASEMENT OVER, UNDER AND ACROSS ALL THAT PART OF SECTION Jl, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FO&LOWS: COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT IISN, UNIT 7, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, PLAT BOOK 4. PAGE 95: THENCE N 87'07'40' E A DISTANCE OF tO. OD FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGTNNtNG OF THE EASEMENT HEREIN BEING DESCRIBED: THENCE CONTINUE N 87'07'40" E A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE N 02'52'20' tV A DISTANCE OF .,15.00 FEET: THENCE S 87'07'40' W A DISTANCE OF 33.00 FEET: THENCE S 02-52'20' E A DISTANCE OF 15.00 FEET; THEI'~CE N 87'07'40' E A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET: THENCE S 02'52'20' E A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING CF THE EASEMENT HEREIN DESCRIBED: CONTAtNIN~. p.O SUBJECT 9 01~ AN ACRE OF' LAND MORE OR LESS: ./rS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. P.L.S. 4.190 SECnCN 3t T485 R27E /'- TEMPORARY S 87jO_7?_O*W / CONSTRUCTION · ~ ~350U.._: -- .. ~ =.EASEMENT . ~'. ' ~'4 . P.O.C. 112 Jll,3N NORmWEST CORNER OF TRACT II$N NOT A SURVEY, I ': for: COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA project N.C.R.W. T.P. 14~LL EXPANSION tlt~e: SKETCH ~ DESCRIPTION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT llll[llllllllllr~llll~ONOl_~ Idate: AUGUST J. I995 III li~,~a |sccle: Jbook: PROJECT: NCRW'FP PARCEL: 702, 703 8 B 2 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") is made and entered by and between Wayson Underground Utilities, Inc., a Florida corporation, whose mailing address is c/o Sanford Martin, Esquire, 2500 Airport road, Suite 3~15, Naples, Florida 34112, (hereinafter singularly or collectively referred to as the "Ow,n. er"), and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, its successors and assigns, whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112, (hereinafter referred to as the "Purchaser"); WHEREAS, the Purchaser requires a Temporary Construction Easement over, under, upon and across the lands described in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement, (hereinafter referred to as the "Property") for the installation of wells; and WHEREAS, the Owner desires to convey the Temporary Construction Easement to the Purchaser for the stated purposes, on the terms and conditions set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the Purchaser has agreed to compensate the Owner for the granting of the Temporary Construction Easement over, under, upon, and across the Property. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises, the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby m,utually acknowledged, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: 1. Owner shall grant Purchaser a Temporary Construction Easement over, upon, and across the Property described in Exhibit '%" attached hereto in exchange for the sum of S200.00. 2. Purchaser shall pay Attorney's fees in the amount of $ ~"g~¢'., 3. Purchaser shall pay Owner for the Temporary Construction Easement and pay Sanford Martin, Esquire for Attorney Fees by County Warrant. 4. Both Owner and Purchaser agree that time is of the essence in regard to the closing and therefore, said closing shall occur within sixty (60) days of the execution of the Agreement by Purchaser. At closing, Owner shall deliver a Temporary Construction Easement to Purchaser in a form acceptable to Purchaser and Purchaser shall deliver the County Warrant to Owner. 5. Conveyance of the Temporary Construction Easement, or any interest in the Property, by the Owner is contingent upon no other provisions, conditions, or premises other than those so stated herein; and the written agreement, including all exhibits attached hereto, shall constitute the entire agreement and understanding of the parties. and there are no other prior or contemporaneous written or oral agreements, undertakings, promises, warranties, or covenants not contained herein. 6. Owner is aware of and understands that the "offer" to purchase represented by this Agreement is subject to acceptance and approval by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. 7. The Purchaser shall pay for all costs of recording the Temporary Construction Easement. All other costs associated with this transaction including but not limited to transfer, documentary and intangible taxes, and recording costs for any curative instruments shall be borne and paid by Owner. 8. This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. 8 ConstructionIN WITNESSEasement WHEREOF,Agreement the onPartiesthts,~__heret°day have _~ecutedof.~~=:t~,this TemporarY19 ~.~___. Dated Project/Acquisition Approved by BCC:~ AS TO PURCHASER: DATED: ATTEST¢ ~: ~ ~,'/. DWIGHT E.' B R?~d,K, Clerk ,',; 't~, · . ' .~' ,~"~~~' ... .:. / ' · -~, . .- .', ,' · .... · Deputy Clerk A'~, T~ .OWNER:,.,'" DATED:~~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY:~ WITNESSES: (Signature) (Printed, Name) , ,, (Printed Name) By: ~ Wayson Underground utilities, Inc. PresidentNice President Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: e Assista~ounty Attorney 2 16 THE FOLLO~ZIffG DE$CRIBEO PROPER~ TS ~ BE PR~E~: N~p ACCOZR~ AS A TEHPO~ CONS~U~ION PR~ PAR~L NO.: ~SE~tlT DE~IP~ON ~ ~PORARY C~S~UC~F~~0207920006 A PROPOSED ~MPORARY CONS~UC~ EASEMENT O~R. UNDER ANO ALL ~AT P~RT OF SEC~ON 5~, TO.SHIP 4a S~, RAN~ 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNt, ~ORIDA, B~NG MORE PAR~Y DES~IBED AS F~O~; CO~M~NG AT ~ N~ST ~RNER OF ~ACT I7. UNIT 6. GOLDEN ESTA~S, P~T BOOK 4, PA~ 93, ~CE N 00'44'00' E A DJSTAN~ OF 60.00 ~ET; ~CE S ~9~'00' E A DISTANCE OF I0.00 ~T TO ~ POINT OF BEGNNING OF ~E ~M~T H~N B~NG DESPISED; ~ENCE S 89~6'00' E A DISTAN~ OF 15.00 ~ET; ~ENCE N ~'~'~ E A ~STAN~ ~ JS. 00 ~ET; ~ENCE N 8916'~' W A OISTAN~ OF 55.00 ~ET; ~ENCE S 00'44'00' W A DISTANCE OF ~5.00 ~ENCE S 89~6'00' E A DISTAN~ OF 20.00 FEET: ~ENCE S 00'44'~' W A DIST~CE OF 20.00 ~ET TO ~E P~NT OF BE~NNING OF ~E EAS~ENT H~EIN DES~IBED; CONTAINING~O. OI9 OF AN A~E ~ LANO MORE OR LESS; SUB.CT T~J~~JEASE S AND RES~IC~ON$ OF RECORD. 'GUY P. AD~MS [~ ' P.L.S. 4J90 SEC~ON 56 T48S R26E ~ N 89'16'00'W ~ ~UPORARY ~ Js. oo ~ CONSmUCnON  ~ S 89~6'00'E ~ ' '~P.O.~. NOR~ST CORNER ~ m~CT 17 17 NOT A SURVEY fcc: COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA IProject: N.C.R.W.T.P. I WELL EXPANSION title: SKETCH & DESCRIPTION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT 2 702 date: AUGUST .t, 1995' scale: Ibook: 1' m 30' IPage: i Project I acad: 516J-E~ no.: 7086 ~ tech: . 7086 ~ X~J~,'s?. I~O.: 703 DESCRIPtiON OF' ~MP~RARY C~S~UC~ EASE~T 0 ' ~ ~ ~208~0~ A PROPOSEO ~PORAR~ CONS~UC~ ~AS~T O~R, U~D~ A~D A~OSS ~LL ~A T PART OF S~C~ 36, TO~IP 48 S~, RAN~ 26 ~ST, COLU~R COUNt, ~ORIDA, B~NG MORE P~RLY 0~S~18~ AS F~O~ COMM~NG AT ~E NOR~ST CORH~ O~ ~ACT 4~, U~T ~, G~ GA~: ESTA~S, P~T BOOK 4, PAGE ~J, ~H~ N 00'44'00' E A DISTAN~ O~ 60.~0 BEC, INNING OF' THE FASt, tENT HEREIN BEING DESCRIBED: THENCE S 89'16'00' E A DISTANCE C4:' 15.00 FEET'; THENCE N 00'44'00' E.A DISTANCE 0=' 60.00 FEE1~ THENCE N 89~16'00'~ W A DISTANCE OF' 65.00 FEET: THENCE $ 00'44'00' W A DISTANCE 0=' I5.00 FEET; THENCE S 8916'00" E A DISTANCE OF' 50.00 FEET: THENCE $ 00'44'00' W A DISTANCE OF 45.00 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF THE EASEMENT HERF, flN DESCRIBED; CONTAINING 0.0,18 OF AN ACRE OF LANO MORE OR LESS: SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. ARIEL R. A.L VAREZ 48 SECTION 36 T48S R26E P.O.C. NORTHWEST CORNER OF TP.~CT 49 49 NOT A SURVEY COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA for: N.C.R.W.T.P. WELL EXPAN~ON Itle: SKETCH & DESCRIPTION OF' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT dale: IIlI~ Ifil * AUGUST 22, 1995 scale: ~book:' I' - 50' ~page: project Jacad:5183-'~' no.: 7086 ~ PROJECT: NCRWTP PARCEL: 704 B, 704 C TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") is made and entered by and between Richard L. Jaeger as Trustee under trust agreement dated January, 1990, whose mailing address is 1625 Pine Ridge Road, Naples, Florida 34109, (hereinafter singularly or collectively -eferred to as the "Owner"), and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, its successors and assigns, whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112, (hereinafter referred to as the "Purchaser"); WHEREAS, the Purchaser requires a Temporary Construction Easement over, under, upon and across the lands described in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement, (hereinafter referred to as the "Property") for the installation of wells; and WHEREAS, the Owner desires to convey the Temporary Construction Easement to the Purchaser for the stated purposes, on the terms and conditions set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the Purchaser has agreed to compensate the Owner for the granting of the Temporary Construction Easement over, under, upon, and across the Property. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises, the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby mutually acknowledged, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: 1. Owner shall grant Purchaser a Temporary Construction Easement over, upon, and across the Property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto in exchange for the sum of $200.00. 2. Purchaser shall pay Attorney's fees in the amount of $ 3. Purchaser shall pay Owner for the Temporary Construction Easement and pay Attorney Fees by County Warrant. 4. Both Owner and Purchaser agree that time is of the essence in regard to the closing and therefore, said closing shall occur, within sixty (60) days of the execution of the Agreement by Purchaser. At closing, Owner shall deliver a Temporary Construction Easement to Purchaser in a form acceptable to Purchaser and Purchaser shall deliver the County Warrant to Owner. 5. Conveyance of the Temporary Construction Easement, or any interest in the Property, by the Owner is contingent upon no other provisions, conditions, or premises other than those so stated herein; and the written agreement, including all exhibits attached hereto, shall constitute the entire agreement and understanding of the parties, and there are no other prior or contemporaneous written or oral agreements, undertakings, promises, warranties, or covenants not contained herein. 6. Owner is aware of and understands that the "offer" to purchase represented by this Agreement is subject to acceptance and approval by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. 7. The Purchaser shall pay for all costs of recording the Temporary Construction Easement. All other costs associated with this transaction including but not limited to transfer, documentary and intangible taxes, and recording costs for any curative instruments sha~l be borne and paid by Owner'. 8 B'2 8. This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Temporary Construction Easement Agreement on this .~ day of~, 19~ Dated Project/Acquisition Approved by BCC: AS TO PURCHASER: DATED: ~?__~~~ ATTEST: AS TO OWNER: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY:~ Barbara'B. Berry, Chairman ' DATED: WITNESSES: ~ (Si~,nature) ,.---/ (Priqted Name) (Sign ,ature) Printed Name) Approved as to form and le~a~ufficiency: .Rodney C./Wade Assista, n/f/County Attorney A PROPOSED i'T~4PCRARY CONSTRUCTICN EASEMENT OVER, UND~ ANO ACROSS ALL THAT PART OF SECTiCN 36, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, CCLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FGLLOW~ COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CCRNER OF' TRACT 81, UNIT 6, COI. DEN GATE . ESTATES, PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE g3,' THENCE N D0'44'00° E A DtSTANCE OF' 60.00 FEET; THENCE.S 8g'16'00' E A DISTANCE OF' 10.00 FEET'TO THE PCINT OF' BEGINNING OF' THE EAEEME~T HEREIN BETNG DESCRIBED: · THENCE S 89'f6'00' E A DISTANCE CF' 15.00 FEET: THENCE N 00'44'00,* E A .DISTANCE OF' 35.00 FEET; · THENCE N 89'16'00° W A DISTANCE*CF' 35.00 FEET: THENCE S 00'44'00' W A DISTANCE OF' 15. G0 FEET: THENCE S 89'16'00' E A DISTANCE CF' 20.00 FEET: · THENCE S G0'44'00' W A DISTANCE CF' 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF' OF' THE EASEMENT HEREIN DESCRIBED: , CONTAININQO. 019 CF~AN ACRE CF' LANO MORE GR LESS: GuY P. ,,fY,~s1' P.L.S. ! SEC]IGN 36 T48S TEMPORARY R25E ? /v 89',6'oo',, /- CONS TRUC T10N ~ Er' 35. oo _ 5/,., EASE~ENT ~ -L IP9 --m (3 20.00 "1 ~1 I ~ .... iz S 89ff6'OO'E o.  -P.O.C. NORTHWEST CORNER C,F T'~AC.T ~! 8O NOT A SURVEY fc~ [project: H.C.R.W.T.P. COUJER COUNTY, FLORIDA WEt. L EXPANS/ON title: SKETCH &: DESCRIPT~CN OF' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASE~dENT project I ocad:Sf63.' ? no.: 7086 } tech: 708d ;' ' "ri B ~0:002081 A PROPOSED ~PORARY C~S~UC~CN ~AEEMENT O~R, UNDER ~0 ACROSS ~LL ~AT PART O~ SEC~ON 36. TO~HIP 48 SCU~, R~NCE 2~ EAS[ CCLUER COUNt, ~ORIOA, 8EING MORE PAR~CUL~RL Y DES~IEED AS COMMEN~NC AT ~E NGR~ST CORN~ OF ~ACT It3. UNIT 5, GOLD~N'~GA~ ESTA~S, P~T BOCK 4. PACE 93, ~EN~ N 00'44'00' ~ A DtSTANCE OF '60.~0 FEET; ~CE S a91~'00' E A D[STAN~ OF I0.00 FEET TO BE~NNING OF ~E EASEM~T HEREIN 8~NG DESCRIBe; ~ENCE S a916'00' E A OISTAN~ OF I5.00 ~ET; ~EN~ N 00'44'00' E A DISTAN~ O~ 55.00 ~ET: ~ENCE N 8915'00' W X DISTAN~ ~ 35.00 ~ET; i ~ENCE S ~0'44'00' W A DISTAN~ GF I5.00 ~ S 8916'00' E A DISTANCE OF 20.00 ~ENCE 5 00'44'00' W A DISTAN~ OF 20.00 FEET TO ~E POINT OF ~E EAS~ENT H~DN CONTAIN[~i~; O. OI9 OF AN ACRE OF LANO MORE OR LESS: SUBJEC~ E.~IENTS ANO RESTRICTIONS CF RECORD. cu~ ~. /~o~ ~ ~.~.s. ~o 112. SECllON $6 T48S R26E - ~ CONS~UCn~ I5. O0 ~ ~ EASEM~T e~ ~ S 8g~6'OO'E .O.C. NGR~$T CORNER ~F ~ACT 113 113 NOT A SURVEY COLDER COUNTY, FLORIDA project: N.C.R.W. T.P. WF! [ EXPANSION SKETCH ~. DESCRIPTION GF TE'MPGRARY CONSTRUCTION EASE7dENT dote: ' AUGUSr 5, 1995 scale: 1' = 30' jpage: project J acad: 5163-1 no.: 7086 J leCh: 7086 PROJECT: NCRVVTP PARCEL: 706A,B,C&D TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AGREEMENT 8 B 2 THIS TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") is made and entered by and between Olde Florida Golf Club, Inc., a Florida corporation, whose mailing address is cio Young, van Assenderp & Varnadoe, 801 Laurel Oak Drive, Suite 300, Naples, Florida 34108, (hereinafter singularly or collectively referred to as the "Owner"), and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, its successors and assigns, whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Flodda 34112, (hereinafter referred to as the "Purchaser"); WHEREAS, the Purchaser requires a Temporary Construction Easement over, under, upon and across the lands described in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and made a part of this Agreement, (hereinafter referred to as the "Property") for the installation of wells; and WHEREAS, the Owner desires to convey the Temporary Construction Easement to the Purchaser for the stated purposes, on the terms and conditions set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the Purchaser has agreed to compensate the Owner for the granting of the Temporary Construction Easement over, under, upon, and across the Property. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises, the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00), and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby m.utually acknowledged, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: 1. Owner shall grant Purchaser a Temporary Construction Easement over, upon, and across the Property described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto in exchange for the sum of $400.00. 2. Purchaser shall pay Attorney's fees in the amount of $ 3. Purchaser shall pay Owner for the Temporary Construction Easement and pay Young, van Assenderp & Varnadoe, P.A. for Attorney Fees by County Warrant. 4. Both Owner and Purchaser agree that time is of the essence in regard to the closing and therefore, said closing shall occur within sixty (60) days of the execution of the Agreement by Purchaser. At closing, Owner shall deliver a Temporary Construction Easement to Purchaser in a form acceptable to Purchaser and Purchaser shall deliver the County Warrant to Owner. 5. Conveyance of the Temporary Construction Easement, or any interest in the Property, by the Owner is contingent upon no other provisions, conditions, or premises other than those so stated herein; and the written agreement, including all exhibits attached hereto, shall constitute the entire agreement and understanding of the parties, and there are no other prior or contemporaneous written or oral agreements, undertakings, promises, warranties, or covenants not contained herein. 6. Owner is aware of and understands that the "offer" to purchase represented by this Agreement is subject to acceptance and approval by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. E7. The. P.urch,a,,s. er shall pay for,all costs of recording the Temporary Const[~c on ,~ , i 4~n~rT-13~o~e. atarv and ~nl~,,vn,~_ihl~ ,.v.,~ -nd rcccr-~ ..... ,,. ¢ ........... .:..~' -I~' 8. This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed Construction Easement Agreement on this~ day of-..,.~-~'~ Dated Project/Acquisition Approved by BCC._ this Temporary .19~.,o'-. AS TO PURCHASER: DATED: A,TT E ~,T: . ~'/' DWIGHT E'.' ~ '.. .'~ Deputy Clerk '/,,:~, . ..;.. ;,~.,\ ~ AS TO'OW"NER: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BAil'BAR/~, B.'B'-EF~Y, Chair'?rr~ DATED: 2 WITNESSES:  Soignature) ¢----(P-_..rinted Na, p3e,) .. (Signature) _ ~,.'-~"- (Printed Name) ..) By: Olde Florida Golf Club, Inc. Pr ie~.nEVice President Approved as to form and I~/a~ ~,/,~cie ncy: Rodney~."Wade - Assistant County Attorney 8 B 2 Et:r~O: 00219400103 D£$CRIPTION Of' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION -EASEMENT A PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OVER, UNOER ANO ACROSS ALL THAT PARr OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF' TRACT I7, UNIT 7, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE gS; THENCE N 87'07'40' E A DISTANCE OF' IO. O0 FEET TO THE POINT OF' BEGINNING OF THE EASEMENT HEREIN BEING DESCRIBED: THF_..;NCE CONTINUE N 87'07'40' E A DISTANCE OF I5.00 FEET; THENCE N 02'52'20' W A OISTANCE OF 35.00 FEET: THENCE S 87'07'40' W A DISTANCE OF' 35.00 FEET: THENCE S 02'52"20' E A OISTANC~ OF 15.00 FEET; THENCE N 87'07'40' E A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE S 02'52'20' E A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING Glr THE EASEMENT HEREIN DESCRIBED: CONT, alNII~I O. OIg,~ AN ACRE OF' LAND MORE OR LESS; SUBJECT,~ EAS~TT$ AND RESTRICTIONS OF' RECORD. P. SEC TIGN 3I T48S R27E /- TEMPORARY S 87'07'40'W/ CONSTRUCTION -- 35.00 ~/~. o~' .... >- EASEMENT ~o ~ll~O_~ ~ N' 87'07'40'~. / s. t_~O.Oo ' NORm~ST CORNER 16 1~ or ~cr ~7 NOT A SURVEY for: COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA jproject: N.C.R.W.T.P. WI:'[L EXPANSION uue: SKETCH & DESCRIPTION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTI'ON EASEMEI~. llllll """"II~RUNDACE.~ Id°re:AuGUST 3. 1995 %~20." ~0219400103 A~ ~Ar PART OF SEC~ON 31. TO.SHIP 48 SOU~, RAN~ 27 EAST, COLLIER COUNt, ~ORIOA. ~NG LlORE PARSLEY OESCRt~ED AS COMM~NG AT ~E N~ST CORN~ OK ~ACT 49. U~T 7. ESTer, P~T 8~K 4,.PA~ 95; ~ N 8~7'40' E A DI~T~ ~ 2fi. CO ~T TO ~E P~NT OF EEGN~NG ~ ~E ~S~T HER~N E~NG OES~IEED; ~EN~ CGN~ N 8~7'40' E A O~STANCE CF 15.~ ~ET; ~ENCE N 02~2'20' W A OISTAN~ OF 60.00 ~ET: ~ENCE S 8~7'40' W A OlSTAN~ OF 65.00 ~ET; ~ENCE S 02~2'20' E A OlST~ ~ 15.00 ~ET; ~ENCE N 87~7'40' E A O~STAH~ OF 50.~ ~ET; ~EN~ S 02~2'20' E A OISTANCE OF 45.00 FEET TO ~E POINT OF EEG;NNiNG OF ~E EAS~ENT H~EIN OES~IBED; CONTAINING 0.038 CF AN A~E OF LANO MORE OR LESS; SUB.CT TO EASEMEN~ AND RES~IC~CNS OF ~ECORD, ARIEL R. ALVAREZ P,L. S. 5J58 SEC NON 3I T485 R27E $ 87'07',~0'W/ _ es.o_o__/__- r .... N CONSTRUC NON ~A SELIEN r : C~4 fcr: COLL.]ER COUNTY, FLORIDA NOT A SURVEY Ip roject: N.C.R.W.T.P. ~ ~ WELL EXPANSION !~ uue:$KETCH &: DESCRIPTION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTIONi £ASEM£i Ill NO[/ llllI Pmfe~lo~ efll~ ple~e~. & b~ date: t AUGUST 22. 1995 I" - $0' project laced: 516. in°': 7086 / tech: 70 " 8 2 ,ss ~, ~ ~m ~ ~ ~ m.: ?osc OESCRIPTION OF' TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION :L~ENI~r219400103 A PROPOSED TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEl, lENT OVER, UNOER AND ACROSS ALL THAT PART OF' SECTION 31, TOV~ISHlP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST. COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIOA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF TRACT 81. Lent 7, GOLDEN GATE ESTATES, PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 95; THENCE N B7'07-40' E A DISTANCE OF I0.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF' BEGINNING OF' THE EAEEMENT HEREIN BEING DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE N 87'07'40' E A DISTANCE OF' I5.00 FEET; THENCE N 02'52'20' W A DISTANCE OF' 35.00 FEET; THENCE S 87'07-40' W A DISTANCE OF 35.00 FEET; THENCE S 02'52'20' E A DISTANCE OF' I5.00 FEET; THENCE N 87'07'40' E A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE S 02'52'20' E A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF' BEGINNING OF THE EASEI,~ENT HEREIN DESCRIBED; CONTAINI,~.Cq 0.019 OF. AN ACRE OF. £ANO MORE OR LESS; sUgJECT~ EA~ITS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD. GUY P. ~/~::~A~dSI/r P.L.S. 43g0 I NOT A SURVEY for: COLUER COUNTY, FLORIDA [project: N.C.R.W.T.P. I F/~L EXPANSION title: SKETCH &: DESCRIPTION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMEN t111 lllll · ''.ae~ARBER & Pmter~lonel enllneer~, plenaem, k ~ml scale: I book: I' - 30' ]Page: Z,.?.t... DESCRIPTION OF' TEUPORARY CONSTRUCTION £AS~MENT A PROPOSED TETWPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT OVER. UNDER AND ACROSS ALL THAT PART OF' SECTION .tl, TOWNSH1P 48 :SOUTH, RANGE 27 EAST', COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW~ COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF' TRACT II3N, UNIT 7. GO[DEN GATE ESTATES, PLAT 800K 4, PACE 95; THENCE N 87'07'40' £ A DISTANCE Or' I000 FEET TO THE POINT. OF' BE6~NNING OF' THE EASEMENT HERETN BEING DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUE N ~7'07'40° E A DISTANCE OF' I5.00 FEET; THENCE N 02'52'20' W A DISTANCE OF' .15.00 FEET: THENCE S a?'07'40' Vi' A DISTANCE OF' 3S. 00 FEET: THENCE S 02'52'20' £ A DISTANCE OF' 15.00 FEET; THENCE N a?'07'40' £ A DISTANCE OF' 20.00 FEET; THENCE S 02'52'20' £ A DISTANCE OF' 20.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF' BEGINNING OF' THE EASEMENT HEREIN DESCRIBED: CONTAININ~ p. 019 O~ AN ACRE Of' LAND MORE OR LESS; SUBJECT T~/~£AS~OE~TS ANO R~S~IC~ONS O~ RECORO. GUY P, AOA~~ ~ P.L.$, 4~90 SECT?ON 31 T48S R27E /- TEMPORARY .~ S 873'~7~0'w / CO,,STRUCTION · _ _ ..--- _ -- i EASEMENT Rsar ' ',.~ e, q l_5_C~j N 87'07'40'~ P O.C.-/ I · 112 1113N ~oRTHw~sr CORNER CF' TRACT 113N NOT A SURVEY lpreject: N.C.R.W.T.P. fo~: C~UER COUNTY. FLORIOA UUe:$KETCH & DESCRIPTION OF TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT da[e: ' AUGUST 3. 1995 I' - 30' ' project I aced: 5163-~ no.: 7086 I lech: 7086 February 2, 1998 To: Cheryl Newman Golden Gate Median Beautification Committee Dear Cheryl, It's great to hear your Committee is moving forward on Median Landscape on CR 951 near Exit 15. As you know, Exit 15 is our eastern entrance to Collier County. Landscaping at this location is a benefit to all. i hope the Board of Collier County Commissioners see the benefits as you and l do. Thank you and your Advisory Board for the pro-active stand. Tom Henning 2151 42"a Street SW Go.3den Gate, Fl.}4116 8-B. 3 Golf Resort 4100 Golden Gate Parkway Nap]es. FL 34116 (941) 455-1010 Fax (941) 455-4038 January 30, 1998 bis. Cheryle L. Newman, Co-Chairman Golden Gate Beautification M.S.'I'.U. Advisory Commiltee 5101 31st Avenue, S.W. Naples, Florida 34116 Dear Ms. Newman: Please accept this letter a.s a showing of our full support of the efforts of the Golden Gate Beautification M.S.T.U Advisory Committees efforts to beautify County Road 95 I. It is so important that om' County Commissioners are aware that C.R. 951 is one of the fa'st impressions th::t visitors often get of Collier County and specifically Naples and the Golden Gate area. First imp:essions last a lifetime. With the expansion of business interests along C.R. 951 il has now become absolutely critical to the future development and repulation of Golden Gale and Naples that we create an esthefically pleasing welcome to our area. Again. we support your effv"ls and look forwar4 Io offering any t,..ssistance possible in making this plan a reality. SincerelT, QUALITY INN & SUITES GOI.F RESORT Timothy C. Frede~n I lead P.G.A. Golf Professional TCF/epv 8-B 3 Golf Resort 4100 Golden Gate Parkway Naples, FL 34116 (941) 455-1010 Fax 194 I) 455-4038 January 30, 1998 :sis. Chcryle i,. Newman. Co-Chairman Golden (}ale Beautification M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee 5101 31si Avenue. S.W. Naples. Florida 34116 Dear Ms. Nev,'man: Plexqe accept this letter as a showing of our full support of the efforts of the Golden Gate Beautificalion M.S.T.U Advisory Committees efforts to beautify County Road 951. It is so important that our County Commissioners are aware that C.R. 951 is one of the first impressions that visitors often get of Collier County and specifically Naples and the Golden Gate area. First impress;ohs la.st a lifetime. With the expansion of business interests along C.R. 951 it has now become absolutely critical to the furore development and reputation of Golden Gate and Naples that we create an esthetically pleasing welcome lo our area. ,Again. we support your effortq and look forward to offering any assistance possible in making this plaa a reality. Regards. (); YAI.II'Y INN & SUITE,% GOI,F RESORT '" ,'" /'"; /Jz/ /- ::.',- / Kc~ in :.1. Durki/~. C.II.A. Vice Pre:;ident/IIotel Operalions KMD/epv 8-B 3 Golden Gate A;ea Chamber of Commerce 3847 Tollgate Blvd Golden Gate. Florida 341 ! 4 (9¢1) 45S-~!00 Jant,ary 30. 1998 Golden Gate Beautification M.S T.U. Advir, ory Committee Golden Gate, Florida Attn: Cheryl Newman [)ear Ms Newman: Please accept this I,..,tter as wrilten suppoa from ti;,., Golden Gate Area Chamber of Commerce for the beautilication of Count>' Road 95 I. specilically, the two mile area from thc canal to Green Boulevard Wc are aware that the M S.I.U. Advisory Committee has the design drawings done for the 0::2 mile area to Golden Gate Parkway known as Phase !, Part A. The Chamber is also aware that funding is available to begin this phase and that it is the committees intent lo approach the Collier CounLv Commission on 'l'uesd:~y. February 3, 1998 and request that the County assist with the much needed beautification project by assuming the costs to carry out Phase I, Part B of the Froject. The (.;olden Gate Area ('han~ber of('on:merce is in favor of thc proposal for the Collier County Commission to place the Ii. rods to complete Phase I, Part B ofthe County Road 951 Beatificatio~ Projec~ in their 1998/99 bud.:'et. If the Chamber mav be ofm:v fiu'tt;cr assi,,~ance to you in lhis endeavor, please lei mc know. Sincerely. (,corge R l)rohir, ski I'~ esidcnt GRD/ms 8-B Sunshme Hardware' ' 141 §th Street North 9090 Bonita Beach Road 2335 County Road 951 Naples (813) 252.2940 Bonita Springs (813) 992.0159 Golden Gale (813) 455-3400 ( ~*-( h. Hrpcr~on Golden G;llc Dc;mfificalion ^dvJso~ Conlmitlce On bch.~lf of' SLmshine Ace Harc.~ar~ Golden Gate ~e supporl tile bcaulification of Counlv Road 951. Rchm,:~,g old and oblaining ne,.~ customers is our primal' goal al Sunshine. Thi~ is al~ I~c goal of any o~hcr rcla~l btt%incss nOl jusl in Gohlc~ Gate bul in Ihe cHtire x~orld. We all have heard Ihc stories of b~Nncs~c~ Ih;it h;~c lost b~smess, or have gone out of business for Ibc ta~ th:d customers have not ~;l/llCd ia ~lop ~C;IIISC 111¢} ~C:C not comfortable %~ilh the ap~arance of Ibc neighborh~. 'I h~s ~ ~omcthmg ~c don't ',T:IUI -'md canl afford Io have haplx:n lo an}' business on County Road 951. A~'.,~in v.¢ .suppor! the bc~mllfi¢:dJon of Count.~- Ro;~d 951. nnd look fomard to more of it in t~e fulurc. '.,,: ..', Gomlcr..~:or¢ "/F StltlSHIA£ DOESNT H,?~/E IT, YOU DG.9'T IIEED IT · TUFF 8-B 2301 C.R. 951, #C · Naples, FL 34116 (941) 353-0444 · Fax (941) 353-9040 E-mail: Tuffpub@aol.com PUBLICATIONS, INC. NAPLES SHOPPER. SENIOR TIMES . GOLDEN GATE GAZETTE ° EVERGLADES ECHO Janua~'29,1998 Cherx'le Ncxx'man Co-Chairman Golden Gate Beautification MSTU Advisoa. Committee 5101 31stAve. SW Naples. FI, 3-I I 16 l)car Chcrx lc: Since x~c as (;olden Gate residents pay a separale MSTU tax to bcauti£y our main road (Golden (late Parkxvay). and an additional tax fi~r beautifying Airport Road, l ,.~'as delighted to hear of your crfims to get the county to help beautifi,' one of the main entrances to Collier County. The l~caulification ofCot, ntv Road 951 v~'ould crca:e a great impact to people visiting, as ,,veil as the maw,' locals who travel that road Expanding the beautification up to Green l:loulcvard is a natural since efforts so far on that roa~ have been more embarrassing than helpful. I will continue lo support your ct'lbrts in any manner ! can. Your hard work on this project is most appreciated Sinccrcl,~. Russell W. '1 :iff 3 8-8 Golden Gate Area Civic Association 47(}1 Golden Gate l'k~s3' ~ (;olden Gate. Fi. 34116 Phone 353-0444 ~ Fax 353-9040 Chc:'yl¢ Newman ¢'O-('h::irpcr,;,m Golden Gate Beautification M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee 5101 31stAvc. SW Golden (J,~c, FL 34116 Janua.w 30. 199,~ l)car ('hcrylc. Media. bcautification is important to the aesthetics of any roadway. As wc have discussed at l?,eau:ilic:ltiOn meetings and Civic Association meetings, County Road 951 is a main artery road ,,,'ay and .should be beautified as soon as possible. It is an entrance to our community as well as an access road to 1-75. Many tourists as well as residents travel it daily. On bchalf of thc Golden Gate Area Civic Association we extend our support and encourage thc cffi)t ,~ of' thc (Jo!den Gate Beautification M.S.T.U. Advisory Committee to partnership with Collier County' to beautify County Road 951. Sincerely, .XI;,'ia Tuft; President G,)hlcn Gate Area Civic Associa!ion RESOLUTION NO. 98-31 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING KAREN URBANIK TO TIlE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION. WHEREAS, the Collier County Planning Commission was established by Collier County Ordinance No. 85-51, as amended by Collier County Ordinance No. 86-76; and WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 91-102, as amended, repealed and replaced Ordinance No. 85-5 l, as amended, re-establishing the Collier County Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 9 I- ! 02, as amended, provides that the Collier County Planning Commission shall be composed of nine (9) members representing the five commission districts; and WHEREAS, there is currently a vacancy on this commission; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners previously provided public notice soliciting applications from interested parties; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Karen Urbanik, representing Commission District No. I, is hereby appointed to the Collier County Planning Commission for a four year term, said term to expire on October l, 1999. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: February 3, 1998 ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BA 6' RX ERR Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David C. Weigel County Attorney DCW&n RESOLUTION NO. 98-32 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING ROBERT ASBEL, JR., TO TilE IMMOKALEE ENTERPRISE ZONE DEVELOPMENT AGENCY WIIEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida adopted Ordinance No. 95-22 establishing the Immokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency pursu;mt to Section 290.001, ct seq., Florida Statules; and WHEREAS. Ordinance No. 05-22 provides that the lmmokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency shall consist of not fewer than eight {8} or more than thirteen members; and WllEREAS. there is currently a vacancy on this board; and Wi lEREAS, a memorandum was received from the Housing and Urban Improvement Manager recommending an appointment to this board; NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COM*IISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Robert Asbei, Jr., is hereby appointed under the local law enforcement agency category to the lmmokalee Enterprise Zone Development Agency for a four year term, said term to expire on April 4, 2002. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: Fcbruary 3, 1998 ATTEST: DWIGI~tT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BA'K~AR~ B~ BEn'P,Y, C-'HAI~N Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David C. Weigei" fi)) County Attorney DCW~kn RESOLUTION NO. 98-33 A RESOLUTION APPOINTING COMMISSIONER PAMELA S. MAC'KIE TO TIlE COUNTY GOVERNMENT PRODUCTIVITY COMMITTEE WHEREAS, The County Government Productivity Committee was established by the Board of County Commissioners through the adoption of Collier County Ordinance No. 91-10, as amended; and WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 93-13 provides that thc Committee shall consist of 13 members, one of whom shall bc the Vice Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners or his/her Board designee; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners recently elected a new Vice Chairman. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that Commissioner Pamela S. Mac'Kie is hereby appointed to the County Government Productivity Committee for lhe 1998 term ~vhich expires on January 5, 1999. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and unanimous vote. DATED: February 3, 1998 ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: BA R~h~RA-B-. Bl~l~o,V, David C. Weigel County Attorney ADV. BD.,'kn COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA REQUEST FOR LEGAL ADVERTISING OF PUBLIC IlEARINGS To: Clerk to the Board: Please place the following as a: XXX Normal Icgal Advertisement (Display Ad,,'., location, crc.) [--] Other: Petition No. (If none. give brief description): PUD-g3-IT(2). Petitioner: (Name &Addrcss): Qomtnunitv Dm'clopmcnI & Environmcn. tal Servicgs Division. 2800 N Horr~ho~. Drive, Naples, Flgtida 3-1104 Name & Address oran.,,' person(s) to be notified by Clcrk*s Office: (If more space is needed, attach separate sheet) Heating before XXX BCC BZA Other Ncwspapcr(s) to lac used: (Comple y if important): Based on advertisement appeanng 15 days before heating. XXX Naples Daily News Other r'-i Legally Required Proposed Text: (Include legal dcscription& com~non location & Size: Companion petition(s), if any & proposed hearing date: Does Petition Fee include advertising co~t? [] Yes [] No ! 13-138323-6491 l0 Reviewed by: ) J./' : t/ Division tlc,qd Dale Lisl A,achmcnts: If Yes. what account should bc charged for advcrlising cosls: Approved ~': ~ Count)' Manager Date AD DISTRIBUTION INSTRUCTIONS For hearings before gCC or BZA: Initiating person to complete one co)' and obtain Division liead approval before submitting to County Manager. Nr, te: Ir legal document is invoh'ed, be sure that any necessary legal rm, iew, or request for s~me, is submitted to Count)' Attorney before submitting to Count)' Manager. The Manager's office will distribute copies: [] County Manager agenda file: to Clerk's Office [] Requesting Division [] OHginal B. Other hearings: Initiating Division head to approve and submit original to Clerk's Office. retaining a copy for file. FOR CLERK'S OFFICE USE ONLY: DateRcccived: /,/~;'~../~,~ Date of Public hearing: -~,/~/~,; Date Advertised: ~ OF PAGEs :~ (including this cover) lllllililillllllllllllilllilllllllllilllllllilllillllllllllllll TO: LOCATION: NAFLES DALLY MEWS FAX ~;O. : 263-4864 COM}fENTS: i11111111111111111111111111111111111111111'i!!11111111111111111 FROI{: ----___._~_~ELLIE HOFFMAN- MINUTES & RECORDS LOCATION: Collier County Courthouse FAX NO: (813) 774-8408 PHONE 'NO: (813) 774 -8406 December 22, 1997 Ms. Judith Flanagan Naples Daily News 1075 Central Avenue Naples, Florida 34102 Re: Notice of Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-83-17(2) Dear Judi: Please advertise the above referenced notice one time on Sunday, January 18, 1998, and kindly send the Affidavit of Publication, in duplicate, together with charges involved to this office. Thank you. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Purchase Order #800551 NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on TUESDAY, February 3, 1998, in the Boardroom, 3rd Floor, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida, the Board of County Commissioners will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE ~4ENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 84-8, FORD MOTOR COMPANY VEHICLE EVALUATION CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BY PROVIDING FOR SECTION ONE, AMENDMENTS TO SECTION IV, GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SECTION TWO, AMENDMENTS TO SECTION V, GENEP~L DEVELOPMENT COM~4ITMENTS; AND BY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Petition PUD-83-17(2), Collier County Community Development & Environmental Services Division, representing Collier Enterprises, requesting an amendment to Ordinance 84-8. Copies of the proposed Ordinance are on file with the Clerk to the Board and are available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TIMOTHY L. HANCOCK, CHAIRMAN DWIGHT Eo BROCK, CLERK By: ?s/Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk (SEAL) 12B 1 December 22, 1997 Mr. Donald W. Arnold Planning Services Director Come. unity Development & Environmental Services Division 2800 Mortk Horseshoe Drive ~;aples, FL 34104 Re: Public Hearing to Consider Petition PUD-83-17(2) Dear Petitioner: Please be advised that the above referenced petition will be considered by the Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, February 3, 1998, as indicated on the enclosed notice. The legal notice pertaining to this petition will be published in the Naples Daily News on Sunday, January 18, 1998. You are invited to attend this public hearing. Sincerely, Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Enclosure 12B ORDINANCE NO. 98- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 84-8, FORD MOTOR COMPANY VEHICLE EVALUATION CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BY PROVIDING FOR SECTION ONE. AMENDMENTS TO SECTION IV, GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SECTION TWO. AMENDMENTS TO SECTION V, GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS; AND BY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on January 17, 1984, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 84-8, which established the Ford Motor Company Vehicle Evaluation Center Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Division staff, on behalf of the property owner, Collier Enterprises, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to amend Ordinance Number 84-8, as set forth below; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Section IV, General Development Regulations, of the Ford Motor Company Vehicle Evaluation Center Planned Unit Development (Ordinance 84-8), is hereby amended to read as follows: 4.3 Permitted Uses and Structures No buildings or structures, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: I. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures G. Any ct~c.r '.:z: G. Communications Section 2.6.3:5.6.2 of the Collier County Land Development Code. H. Any other use whiCh is comparable in nature with the foreEoinR uses a~,! which the Plannint Services Director det¢,-w, ine$ to be compatibles. 4.6 Maximum Height ofBuildings & Structures Fifty (50) feet above finished grade, excepting ~,~m~,_~io_~ !.ower, which may be peTmitted to a maximum heiAht of 185 feet. 128 ! SECTION TWO: AMENDMENT TO SECTION V, GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS. Section V, General Development Commitments of the Ford Motor Company Vehicle Evaluation Center Plam~ed Unit Development. (Ordinance 84-8), is hereby amended to read as follows: 5.9 General Provisions t un'ts V ' ' ' O v ' a SECTION THKEE: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of Cotmty Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this day of _, 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BY: Chairman, Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney DWA/md NapLes DaiLy Nays NapLes, FL 339~0 Affidavit of PubLtcatto~ NapLes DaiLy Na~s BOAR0 OF COUHTY COflHISSIONERS ATTN: NANCY SALOGU~ PO BOX ~13Cr16 NAPLES FL 3~101-~5016 REFERENCE: 0012~O 800~51 5762~009 NOTICE OF INTENT TO State of FLorida County of CoLLier 8efore the undersigned authority, personaLLy appeared B. Lamb, who o~ oath says that she serve~ as the Assistant Corporate Secretary of the NapLes DaiLy tle~s, a datLy newspaper published et NapLes, in CoLLier County, FLorida: that the attached copy of advertising was published tn said newspaper on dates Listed. Affiant further says that the said NapLes OatLy News is a newspaper published at NapLes, in utd CoLLier County, FLorida, and that the sa~d newspaper has heretofore been c~ttnuousLy published in said CoLLier County, FLorida, each day and has been entered as second class ~atL matter at the post office in NapLes, in said CotLter County, FLorida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first pubLJcatto~ of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or coporatto~ any discount, rebate, c~ss~m or refund for the purpose of securing thts advertisement for pubL~cattc~ in the said newspaper. PU3LZSHED ON: 01/18 AD SPACE: 79.000 INCH FiLEO Ot~: 01/q9/98 Signature of ~fftant · 'i PersonaLLy known by me~,, OX ~NOTK~- OF INTENT hat Off TUESOA¥, ,OO~t 3rd Floor, AN oRDINANCE AMENDING ROI- TION CE TER ~AN~ U~ ~ENTS TO ~ REGULATIOH: ~C- TION ~O,~ ~ TO ~ r~ V, MEN ~MIT- MENT$: AND ~~.~a~ I T~.~ ~ I ~ - BROCK, ~ DWIGHT ~ ~ 11~S ORDINANCE NO. 98-9 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 84-8, FORD MOTOR COMPANY VEHICLE EVALUATION CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BY PROVIDING FOR SECTION ONE, AMENDMENTS TO SECTION IV, GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS; SECTION TWO, AMENDMENTS TO SECTION V, GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS; AND BY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on January 17, 1984, the Board of County Commissioners approved Ordinance Number 84-8, which established thc Ford Motor Company Vehicle Evaluation C_'enter Planned Unit Development; and WHEREAS, Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Division staff, on behalf of the property owner, Collier Enterprises, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, to amend Ordinance Number 84-8, as set forth below; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by thc Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida that: SECTION ONE: AMENDMENT TO SECTION IV GENERAL DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS Section IV, General Development Regulations, of the Ford Motor Company Vehicle Evaluation Center Planned Unit Development (Ordinance 84-8), is hereby amended to read as follows: 4.3 Permitted Uses and Structures No buildings or structures, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used. in whole or in part, for other than thc following: I. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures G. Communications tower, consistent with develo men rand rd o Section 2.6.35.6.2 of the Col~ Land Develo~ H. Any other usc which is comparable in nature wit~ses and which the Plannin~ determines to be compatible. 4.6 Maximum Height of Buildings & Structures Fifty (50) feet above finished grade, excepting ~ omm nication tower, which ma be 'rmitte t a aximum~ SECTION TWO: AMENDMENT TO SECTION V, GENERAL DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS. Section V, General Development Commitments of the Ford Motor Company Vehicle Evaluation Center Planned Unit Development, (Ordinance 84-8), is hereby amended to read as follows: 5.9 General Provisions Test units shal/be motor ve. hicles. Testin, of hi h erformance vehicles shall be_.~.permitted onl urin da Ii ht ours SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall bccomc effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by the Board of County Commissioners of this.~,h~ day of~, 1998. ('oilier County, Florida, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST:' DWIGHT El'BROCK, CLERK P~pprovcd as't° Form and Legal Sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney DWA/md 12f STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true cody of: ORDINANCE NO. 98-9 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 3rd day of February 1998, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 3rd day of February, 1998. DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and G~[~ ¥. Ex-officio to Board~.-'- ' ..... ','-'". ~ County co_mmissione~..' .. '. ' ,']'... ~,.'. eputy Cle~[..' .~ .. '.." ~' ' .~ '...'...:. ·; ~, ~% /~DRESS BEFORE CCPC ~~.~~ ', 1. Michael J. Bruet, Vice Chairman must RECUSE himself because: H,~ i< employed as Development Manager rcm Collier Enterprises, the present 'fee simple c~er" of the pr~pert7 currently occupied by the Ford Florida ::"~l';a~inn Centar, and lea~o-h~Ider far same; b', .Hq .~rnto the letter t~ :.ir. Vinc~,.nt Cm~tero, ~.4m;r,l,trator, Co!ller Cogent:.' Corrrmmit:; Development ~::d En,;ironmental Services, 'authorizing Collier :~', $~.rve as ag~.nt t,~ emend Ordinance #84-8,; H~ pravlded three paragraphs of reasoning as to ~h¥ the Ordinance # 84-8 needed to be amended, citin~ ';nprovtded and unspecified "Rules established by the Federal Highway Administration'; · ~ He prot'ided the emendation to the ,ama Ordinance ir; 'Exhibit "A" submitted therewith, viz: "E. Testing units shall be motor vehicles' 'lhich emendment, albeit incompletely stated, is part and parcel of the proposed emendation. el Director of Planning Donald ~. Arnold specifically noted in his "Executive Summary' that 'Collier Enterprises, as fee simple property o~ner. .has expressed a desire to amend certain provisions of th~ PUD. . " Inasmuch a-~ :.Ir. Bru~t: sits as "ice-chairman nf the Call;er County Plan- ning Commission; ; ,and a' the same time i~ acting as an employee of _~llier Enterpr.ise~ and is also ~ lel4~a'~ing ag~nc'/ pn~er tn ~nlli~r c;,.;ntv therein; thPs4 ~::ite,':!'.'~l'; ,and clearI7 indicatm a conflict of interest bn~h ~n h:s h~half .an~ that of his amployer Collier Enterprises. Mr. grue: shn,;Id therefore recus~ himself from the Collier County Planninq Conmi~i~n during ~ actions taken far consideration o~ the amendment o~ '.Srdinance · 84-~. 43 2. Noti~ication Issues: Xotlfficatinn ~f pr,;pert? ou,~ers in the lrFrnediate vicinity of FEC '~'a~ d~fici~nt and incomplete, because: a) ';aithlortend~n Wildlife Sanctuary was never notified tn ~T~ting of the forthcoming CCPC hearing; ?;aith!~riendun Wildllfm Sanct,~ary o¢~s land irr~edia- telV adjacent to the 'Ford Motor Company Vehicle ~'.'aluati~n Center ?l]nned Unit Pevelnpment Con,nun- it';' and within 300 feet of the FEC property; [F~IC'~'ECPL~] viz. Golden Gate Estates, Unit 91, Tract 116, Tax ID: 41510640003 OR 2356 pg 2627; The Florida Panther National ~ildlife Refu3e ~as not notified in CTittng of the forthcoming CCPC hearing; [Personal communication and subsequent letter from Jim Krakowski, FP~ ~anager, January 8, The Florida Panther National ~ildlife Refuge also ocns land within 300 feet of the FMCVECPL~, viz. 'That part of section 34, To~ship 49 South, Range 28 East, Tallahassee Meridian, Collier County, Florida, being more particularly described as:' [See attached legal description]; Therefore, such lack of notification prevented a timel~ and com- plete response ~ the above adjacent propert~ o~ners i...~n an~ com~nentarv relatint to the proposed emendment of Ordinance # 84- 8; and The CCPC ~ill therefore lack much da.t.~ needed for them to make an informed and detailed assessment of the i~sues at hand. 44 3. Issues of C<m~pllance Th-, last paragraph of the 'Dear Property O~ner" letter from the C,~:1:e:' Co,Jnt¥ Corrtauntty Development and EnvironmentaI Service ~;v:~[on notes that the petition application, development plans, and other pertinent information related to this peti- tion i~ kept on file and may be reviewed at the Development ~:"':qes Center. ' file that ~['as made available contained a document entitled: '~ppl~cation for Public Hearing for PUD .-~nendment/DO Amendment, but ~as incompletely filled out, This is contrary to the ~Affadavit' section on page 3 which states: "'~,a ,]nderstand iht, application must be completed and accurate before a hearing can be advertised.' ~t ts not cIear ~hether the document provided to the general publxc ~as indeed incomplete, or ~s superceded by a more com-- p1,~te dcct~ent. Clearly, this issue needs to be addressed to ens~re compliance by County staff with their o~ rules. 45 12a 1 4. Issues of Substance To ccntimm any ocr, side. ration of the proposed emendation to qrdtnan,'o 81-a '~I1 re~t~lt in a violation of certain portions of tho Zon~nq Section of the Calliar Cmmty Land Deve1~pment Cod~, ~ .... 7 2 4 , 2. ~,.2-.5.,and 2.7.3.5.1. in that, based on the above ~at~m~nt~' ,q., ~-t,~,.. -' .3.",r,~,,'h~,,, :*.:;ITITliSsion ,£'r~,11Irl 5~. :lrlahlq t,3 meet *he. r~,-1,~:r~.m,mts nf 2.7.2.4. beca~:se the,:' l'o~:Id he .,,~ :, ,.vi~:,iuat~.'",~ ~t'id7 ar,¢l,'.~;' con.~ider the pro- pa,ed chan~es in the Ordinance 84-4, ov~in5 to the fa:l:~r~ b'/ County ,toff to ascertain and notify some property o~mers ~hose land~ lie adjacent to~ and lithln ~90 feet o_~f ,the .F..',ICL'EPUD, and b~ The failure of the County staff to provide such notification in a timely manner thereto; thus c' Pre:.'anting such property o~ners from presenting the necessarly detailed response and data supporting ~h~ir position either far or against the amendment; and d~ Ck~ir'.S t.a such failure the CCPC under 2.7.2.5. ~'ould lpso facto obtain an incomplete assessment as to i) "Thether the proposed change ~ill adversely influence living conditions in the [adjacent] n~ijhborhood'; and in addition, [2.7.2.5.6.] :i~ "'L'heth~r tho proposed change ~'ill create or ex- :-~-~'~:'.'~-:7 increase. . .ar creat,~ types of traffic de,*med incompatible ~'ith surrounding land uses, h~,:ause of. .projected types of v~hicular traffi,: .or other'~'tse affect public safety' · 'l'he t~ .~ ,,-..r the proposed :hange ;lill adversel~- ~c~ propert; values in ~he adjacant area' [2.7.2.5.10. ! "~'he:hcr the pr,;posed change ,~i11 he ~ deterrent the impr,~vement cr d~.ve!opmer, t cf adjacent ?r)pert:.'. . .' viz. eastern Golden .Gate Estates ~lon~ the De Sot,.) BI:.'d corridor, [2.?.9.5.11] .... '£'hether the proposed change will constitute a Sr.'~nt of special privilege to an individual s~er as contrasted 'i'ith the public ~'elfare' [2.7.2.5.12. ! "i'hether the chant:~..~uggestad t, ,~,~t nf ,cole .~ith the needs of the neighborhood. [2.7.2.5.14.] 46 4. Issues of Substance (continued): · .It) 'Whether tt ts impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed us~. in distri,tts already permitting s,ich use. [2.7.2.5.15. ] planning corr~i~sion ~m,Jld itself be ,lnahle to meet r~q,i:r~m~nt'~ of 2.7.2.5.1. teca,ise ~,~ch a prop,~.~ed emenda:;c,n ~,y clef init:or, ~s 'dee~ed a substar, tial chan~e' and therefore '.~hether: 'There is a substantia! increase in the impacts of the development 'lhich ma,,' include, hut are not limited to, increases in traffic generation;, or impacts on oth~.r p~lhli¢ facilities'; or [2.7.3.5.1.5.1 "The change 'ztll result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation .%lanual published ~.v tho, In.~titute of Traffi:: Engineer~'; or [2.7.3.5.1.6. ] x) 'The change will bring about a relationship to anl abutting land use that ~'ould be incompatible with an adjacent land use'; or [2.7.3.5.1.8. ] Xi ; *tn',;' modification to the . .PUD document or amendment to a PLT) ordinance uhich. . .~,'ould increase the intensity of the permitted land t.l%e$; ' [2.7.3.5.1.9. ] CSUI,J not adequately be ccnsidered at this time. $' T?,~ wording in the propo..~ed emendation is too vague :n ~e'~ar",s t' '~pecifls tS'p~s, numbers and methods ... te'~t:n2 fc.r the 'm~;t;r vehicles' cf Exhibit 'A' :,r 'h'.5~. per~rman,-~ '.'th' 'lei' '- th~ 'Cr~inar,,:e No.;. 98--'; ':ct :~ there any ind:,t4t:3n tn the same proposal ~f k,:u man-,', hoe often, for hc~ Ions, and during · zhat ~pecific times these same vehl,:les ~'culd be tested; ~,) 'hat ,, ~, a,a .......... lm III IIIIIIII III ]11 II I I IIII I IIII the CCPC not only clearly' 1acks the necessary data to inf.~rm~.d le,'Isl,m .~s to the. 'motor vehicles' in the b~inB p?;p,Js~d; make an amendment that :he '.'~r':' !"nerallt'.' '~f the proposed ~'ording ,~'ill permit ~mApocifi~.d activlties beyond those ~'hich the CCPC might be :,mtemplati~3 '~ .. ~ . aI,n I.~,~k, tho. n~ce,,ar¥' dat~ t,c assess the. .~,'~:pnt ~,~1 :,:f.',-.t.., t,~. pr~,po-~:d emendat ion of the c, rdinance ma.v ,a ,: ;r'. ,~,- ~:;rr;,;n:iing r~:r~I residential neighborhood; ~s ,z,~i! '~, :Lie enviropm~nta!Iv sensitiv~ l~nd, ,urrounding th~ PUD proper:7, a, cl~arly delineated and depicted on the County's ~zn l~nd-u,e d~cum~nt$. 5. CONCLUSIONS AND REQUEST: Naithlcri,~ndun ~l'ildlife Sanctuary therefore respectfully requests thai thi~ p,.~hli,: hearin~ .and emendation process be tabled for 60 days in order to allo~' the necessary time for: l_J_ County staff to complete the requisite Application for Public Hearin~ document and thereby conform t_9.o the statements therein ~'hich stipulate that the "application must be completed and ,,,~ccurat~_ _ t'.~f,sr~ a hearin~ can be advertised"; 2) Co,Jntv staff lo adequatel}' perform the requisite and more detailed studies on potential impacts on traffic, quality of .!.if~ and environmental impacts that may result from the ordi-2 nonce chans~--~, and ~'hich are presentl~ lacking; and XL T~, ~F:r.'tde such aollected data as are their our= 'l,:,cument~;. and therebv clearlF mandated by 4_3_ To allo,~ -~ther interested parties, includina but not restrict- ed! t_2 ?jaithloriendun ¢'ildlife Sanctuary, t._3o perform a similar ~ .". ':'; he CCPC t.'.~ adeqtla-~~,' - ,- ~-,., anal~'ze no: only the present · .,,,~,..m~r, : r4l.at;nq ~..] the b. oth the Ordinance ~ 84-~, and its ;c:-,:o,:.,~:.~ ~m~ndat::n, but t~ consider the 2ertinent informtion that ~h;,',;':~ ha'.'= h,ten provided ~ Cmmtv staff b~It is present!.~: l~cJing, ~n,.1 ~r,v 2drtinent future information as ,~'~II; so that ~ The ""'~ ' , ..... tan oncamitantly frame an informed, detailed, and ,3ppropri.at~ response usin~ ~11 the data. fai r ................ ...... ',,,FTHF. P FORD ~'q"'"'; " 1 THATS BEING A GOOD NEIGHBOR APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC HEARING FOR PUD AKEND~/DO AM]Q~MENT COMML'NITY DEVELOP~ DMSION PLANNING SERVIcEs Name cf Applicant(s) Applicant's Mailing Address City State Applicant's Telephone Number: Res.: Zip B%/S.: is ~he applicant the owner of the subject Yes No .... (a) if app!ican= is a land trust, so indicate and name beneficiaries below. (b) If applicant is corp~oration o~her than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers and major stockholders below. (c) If applican= is a partnership, limited par=nershi~ or other business entity, sO indicate and name principals below. (d) if applican= is an owner, indlca=e exactly as reccrded, and list all o=her owners, if any. (e) If applican= is a lessee, attach copy cf Imasa, and indicate ac=ual owners if not indicated on =he lease. (f) If applicant is a '- - con..ac. ~ur:haser, ~--*-~ contract, and indicate a==ual o%~er~s) name and he!cw. (If space is ~nadequa=e, a==ach on separa:a page.) Name cf Agen~ Donald W. Arnold Fir~ 'n!~er Agents Mailing Address 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive City Na~ims, State FL Telephone Number: Res.: Bus.: 12B 1. 3.. PUD O~DZ~A.N'C£ N~ AND N'u'~ZR: ~,o~'d Motor Co. ¥iht, cZe gvalu&t~,on C~n~ 4. D~AILED LEG~ DES~I~ION OF ~ ~P~ C~ BY ~ saparaSe legal description for propl~ ~nvolved ~n each ~is=r~. 40o' scale) . ~E A~PLIC~NT IS ~S~ON~IB~ FOR S~PLYING ~E CO~ ~G~ DESCRIPTION. IF Q~STIONS ~ISE CON~G ~E LEG~ DES~ION, ~N ENGiNEeR'S C~TIFI~TION S~ BE ~~. TOWNSHIP RANGE SECT!0'J . SEE ATTACHED G~GA~ 5. Address er !=ca=ion of subject Does property owner own conHiguous property to the subJec= property? if so, give complete legal descripHion of enHire contiguous proper~y. (If space is inadequate, aHtach on separate ~age). T':Pi CF A~F_NDMENT: A. PUD Documen% Language Amendment B. PUD Masse.- - Plan A.nendmen= C. Deveicpment Order Language Amendnen= DOES ~MENDMENT COMPLY WITH THE COMPREHENSIVE- No..'' no, e~lain: HAS A PUBLIC HEARING BEEN HELD ON THIS PROP=-RTY WITHIN THE LAST Y--_kR? iF SO, iN ~-6OSE NAME? :I2B D~P~? ~ ~Y ~GES PROPOSED FOR ~ ~ SOLD ~V/O~ O~PED? Yes. NO. IF YES, DESCRIBE: (A~A~ ADDITIONAL SHE~S IF NECESS~Y). AFFIDAVIT We, being firs= duly sworn, depose and say =hat we are =he o'~ners of the property described herein and ~hich is the subject matter of the proposed hearing; that all ~he answers to =he q~es~ions in this application, and all sketches, data, and other supplementary matter attached to and made a part of this application, are honest and true to the bes= of our knowledge and belief. We understand this application nus= be comDleted and accurate before a hearing can be adver=ised. We fur=her permit the undersigned to act as our represen=ative in any mat~ers regarding this Pe=ition. :;CTE: SiGNAT'_-RES OF ALL C~ERS A-:.E ?3_~DATORY. $IGNATL~E CF CW~ER SiGNAT:,~E OF OWNER SiGNAT~7. E 0= AGENT Stale of Florida Coun%'; ~ ~o~iier The foregoing App!i:a~io- was ackncwled~e~ ~efore me =his day cf , 199 by , who is ~ars~na'iy known ~o me :r who has produced as identification and who did (did n:=~ take an cat~. 'Si=na-.ura of :;c-_arv % o NOTARY BUBLIC · .n lre My C o..-u~, ~ s s i- Exp 9UD',DO AP~LiCATICN/md/41/~ 12S 1 128 1 Lloyd Turgeau 4848 30th Ave. ~E. Naples, F~. 34117 Ja~ 15, 1998 Commimon ~3 Michael A. ~ Ch~lrm~n 6120 18th Ave. &W. Naples, Fla. 34116 Mr. Dnvis: I am writing to you to express my opposition t.o. your petition to annnend .your current PUD at the Ford Vehicle Evaluation Center. _~ am probobly the closest residence to the 'test track'. As of now we ~,~"U°. ~~ ~:. :o ~? ,~ _,:om~ ,'ro., ,'or,,..' ,o. ,___ ~ . .:,fa,, _ tugger, ,taxer, and louder vehicles we both ~_n,~.,.~h.~t_ ~ ?i]..take ~.wl_y from the 'quiet' that we moved out here to .4 y uesmes me noise level, please consider the wlldl~ -- - w~ do to'property v~ues out here. ume, ami whit it Thank you for your consideration. · geau~ 12B Chain'nan. Cotli~' Cotuu~ t~lami.u8 Commi~on Collier Coum7 Governmeat Complex CC: Ail Collier Coum7 Plaxmhtg Commisaio, Munbers ! un wring this lotto' to expreas my concerns relating to the request by Ford Motor Company to ame~ ks PUD ordiaazx~ #84-8. I b~ve the following concenu thaz I th~ ~zould be ~ befor~ say ~ I fed tb~t the am~dments, as put forth, ate too vague asd cannot be enforced, tbu~, my drea~ of my own home where I~mt ~o be are now in jeopardy. t aaa t'eet ~ Collier Cotmty Iard Devdopm~ Code re~tatkn~ eqnd~ 2.7.2.5 have been not b~e~ followed, ~ sub sectioes 6, I0, 11 ~114, wl~ch ! direc:ly ~ra~t me a~l my plans to build la tl~ atet I un ~1~o reque~tixlg that Mr. ,M~ J. Bmet d~lmi~ ~from tl~ ptoe, e~; I fed he is in curdti~. ~inc~ ~ is scti~ ~s ~ agem fo~ the Ford Motoe Compat9, ~4~iI¢ az the ~ame time ~ · ~ ~th~ I~tnntn~ ~na~l~oa. %you/,~ r your time in thJ~ matter, a:xl ! hoi:~ you ~ _ ~*"~'~_~der nty thouglm. mas Maz;:a .. 980 Huron Court. #103 Marco I:darld. Fl. 34145 12B 1 g8 04:2gP Putnam £ng. & Const. 813 354-158g,,. i P.OI I ! E~: ~IF~ ~ C.E. PI:~. ~~ ~1~ TO 643::3266 P.~2 28 27 $ % $ ~ SECTION \ ,.~ -. $4 ' i; * C. m .aI-L. IG~ TOR ~ I- ~ t i SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION /48.46 ACRES + 121 1 Lloyd Turgeau 4848 30th Ave. S.E. Naples, Fla. 34117 Feb. 2, 1998 Collier Co. Commissioner District 4 Pamela S. Mac'kie 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Fla. 34112-4977 Ms Mac'kie: This letter is express my concern and opposition to the possible expansion of the Ford Vehicle Evaluation Center. At present, we have no complaint to the noise level or other disturbance such an operation might bring. But the proposed expansion will change this residential area tremendously. The testing and racing of faster and larger vehicles will increase the noise level significantly as well as depreciate our home and property values. We purchased our property under the understanding we were in a residcntial zone and not commercial. We are very much against this and wanted to let you know. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, lloyc~Turgeau~' ' ~./ 12B 1' 12B 1~ 128 1' Chairman, Collier Country Commission Collier County Government Complex Naples, Fl CC: All Collier County Commission Members February 2, 1998 I am writing this letter to express my concerns relating to the request by Ford Motor Company to amend its PUD ordinance #$4-$. I have the following concerns that I think should be addressed before any such amendment is granted'. I own property in this area along 380, Ave near Desoto Boulevard and have been planning to build a home in this area sometime in 1998, I selected this area for its pristine beauty and peaceful, quiet atmosphere where I could be close to nature. This has been goal for most of my life. I will have serious reservations about building here if'the Ford Company will be allowed to test any type 'motor vehicle'. The noise implications from this will be tremendous since ! would be living so close to the test track. ! am also very concerned about Ford wanting to build a 500 foot 'tower" on their property. What are the implications to the residents of the area? Will it affect radio/television reception, will'it have large red flashing lights that will affect the residents and nature? The Ford request does not address any of these issues. In addition, any interference by this "tower' could. adversely affect my means to make a living, since ! would be using satellite dishes to access the internet, which I need to do for my job. I feel that the amendments, as put forth, are too vague and cannot be enforced, thus, my dream of my own home where I want to be are now in jeopardy. I also feel that Collier County Land Development Code regulations, especially section 2.7.2.5 have been not been followed, especially sub sections 6, I0, ! ! and 14, which I feel directly affect me and my plans to build in this area. I am also requesting that Mr. Michael J. Bruet dismiss himself from this process; 1 feel is in conflict, since he is acting as an agent for the Ford Motor Company while at the sam'~ time being a member of the Planning Commission. Thank you for your time in this matter, and I hope you will consider my thoughts. Thomas Mazza 980 Huron Court, #103 Marco Island, Fl, 34145 1 l,loyd Turgeau 4848 30th Ave. $.E. Naples, Fla. 34117 Feb. 2, 1998 Collier Co. Commissioner District 3 Timothy J. Constantine 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Fla. 34112-4977 Mr. Constantine: This letter is express my concern and opposition to the possible expansion of the Ford Vehicle Evaluation Center. At p-~--L ~" hMve~ no complaint to the noise level or other d~.tg, rbance. ~flx aa operation might b~:in~ BUt the proposed expansion will change this residential area tremendously. The testing and racing of faster and larger vehicles wiil.~cr~ea..s~.~.the noi~ level significantly as well as depreciate our home and property values. We purchased our p'~perty under the understanding we were in a residep..tial zone and not commercial We are very much against this and wanted to let you know. Thank you for your consideration. Sincerely, Lioy4Turgeau 128 PRILgENTATION I:(')R I)R. ROBI':RT (;()RI:. COI.I.IER COUNTY COMMISSI()N MEETING FEBRUARY 3. 1998 QUESTIONS FOR COUNTY STAFF: I) Is there potable municipal or (,ounty potable ~vater lo the s~te. 21 Is there municipal or County .~wcr .~rvicc to thc site'? 3) What is thc I:.mergency Medical Service rcspon~ time to the site? 4) What is the fire service response time to thc site': 5) }las the County undertaken an:,' studies to determine the impacts o1' the intensified uses on the potable water system; thc sewer system: the emergency medical service dcli&c~' sygtem or thc fire service system? 6) What facility does the occupant have to provide potable water: sewer .~r',icc: emergency medical service: or tire service? 7) Pursue the detail of each sen'ice ~o demonstrate that staffdoes not know, with an)' specificity, whether the occupant can adequately provide the serxices. 81 What specific testing operations are going to take place on the site should iht; amendatory ordinance pass'? 9) Is there an)' limitation in the proposed ordinance regarding the kinds of vehicles that can be tested. 10) t;nder the proposal, could semi-tractor trailer trucks be tested at the facility: military tanks: rubber-tire, jet propelled ,,'chicles': 1 I~ Does thc present f'acility have a fuel depot? I If no "fuel depot" then pursue what on-site fueling Facilities arc available? I 12) What is the inventors' of fuels that will be available on site? 13) Do you know il' there is an5' special fircfighting apparatus or retardants which arc necessary to deal with fires From particular Fuels? 14) Have you established particular noise profiles regarding the variety of vehicles that will be permitted to be on-site tested? ] 5) l las thc Count.,,' established regulations requiring an.,,' s~-cific le,,'cl of muffling thc noise from test vehicles? ] 6) Yot, testified before thc Planning Commission that the County regulations prohibit noise levels above decibels reading of 65. in the da)'. and 60. at night. Would you plea.~ cite the regulation on which you rely for that testimony. 17) "NOISE?" Are you familiar '.~,'ith Article Il of Chapter 22 of the Collier County Code. titled 18} ,.\re vou familiar with the standards for a declared no~s¢ nmsancc. 19) REAl) STANDARI) from Section 22-21. ' 20) Are you aware that it is unlawful to discharge exhaust from an internal combustible engine, into the air. except through a muffler or other device which will pre,,'ent loud or explosive noises? 211 Are you aware that it is unlawful to use an engine muffler cut-out, by pass or similar device in a residential area? 22) Are you aware that it is unlawful to modify an engine exhaust system in a manner that increases or amplifies sound from the exhaust system? 23) Are you familiar with the design of the exhaust systems that the occupant intends to usc on the race cars to bc tested at the facility? 24) tlas the County undertaken an.',' impact studies regarding what effects the intensified use on the property will ha,,'e on the animal habitat and animal behavior in the area and adjacent areas'? 251 l las the Count)' made an inventory of the fauna species in the area? 26) i ias the Count)' determined ho,,,,' man.',' black bear inhabit the site and the areas adjacent to thc site'? ..panthers'? ~ 27} [las thc Count.,,' conduclcd a stud.,.' to determine ',,.hcthcr thc proposed change wi[I advcrscl'.' effect property values in thc adjacent area'? ' 28) [las the County conducted a stud)' to determine whether thc proposed change will be a detriment to the improvement or development of the adjacent property? ' 29) Has the Count) conducted a stud)' to determine whether there is another area of thc Count)' that would be better suited fbr thc use of a testing center as indicted in the stall' 2 12B b~,ckup'.' 30) Arc there any other automobile testing centers, of the nature of the one under discussion, in Collier Count>'. 31) Is it true that the County authorized the Count>' Manager to go to Michigan ~o meet with the Ford representatives concerning this undertaking. 32) meetings. Is it true that thesc proceedings flow directly from thc commitments made at tho.~ 33} It is true. is it not. that thc proposed change will provide a special benefit to owner of the property, and it will provide a special benefit to the Ford Motor Company? 34} Arc you familiar with thc provisions of Section 2.7.3 of thc Development Code': 35) Is the present application submitted pursuant to Section 2.7.3? I 36) Do you have available to you thc written findings of thc Planning Commission as required in Sections 2.7.2.5.2.7.2.8 and 2.7.3.2.5 of the Development Code? 37) Docs the staff consider the establishment of a PUD to be a rczoning? ] Rcferen[:c to Sec. 2.7.3.2.6 (LDC 2:242} I 381 Thc staff ha.,, determined the pending application to contemplate a "substantial change" within thc meaning of Section 2.7.3.5. I. has it not'? '~ 39) There arc two changes proposed for Section 4.3 of Ordinance 84-8. is that correct'? 40) :')ne of those changes is "communication towers" as a permitted structure and use. is that correct': 41) That change mc~,n.~ that thc prior Sub-section (i would become !!. and a ney,' Section G xvould be added to read "Communication to,,,,'cr, consistent with development standards of section 2.6.35.6.2 of thc Collier County Land Development Code." is that right? 42) That language change you believe to be a "clarification" is that correct? 43) The proposed change to new sub-section H also has a language change in it where the word "compatible" is changed to the word "comparable." is that correct? 44) Now after that. there is a change in Section 4.6 of Ordinance 84-8 under thc heading of "Maximum Height of Buildings & Structures. is that correct? ! 3 12B 1 45) Thc language of thc prior section has bccn changed by deleting the words antenna" and adding thc language" a communications tower which ma)' bc permitted to a height of 185 feet. is that also correct? 46) At thc Planning Commission hearing, thc staff made an additional oral amendment to increase the height to 500 feet. is that correct'? 47) So. if the proposal passes, as orally amended, then a communication tower could be erected to a height of 500 feet. is that correct? "48) 500 feet'? Do you kno,,~' of an.,,' communi'cations antenna that was constructed to a height 49) In fact. isn't it the ca.~ that thc reason towers arc built is to hold the antcnnas'? 50) Arc you familiar with Section 2,6.35 of thc Development Code titled "Communication 'l'ov, ers ?" 51) Section 2.6.35 or thc l.)cvclopmcnt Code treats tmvcrs and antennas difli:rcntly. does it not? 52) In ract. Section 2.6.35 refers to thc towers as the supporting structures for antennas, does it not? J Reference 2.6.35.1 I 53 ) Sub-section 2.6.35. I treats structures and towers as two separate uses docs it nor.' 54) Indeed. thc primary purpose of thc tower is to raise thc height of thc antenna, is that not correct? 55) I,,n't it also true that Section 2.6.35 prohibits to',~crs over 185 feet. unless certain critical standard., are met'? 56) .So. il' this proposed amendment passes, that would suggest that. in this ca.~. Section 2.6.35 is inapplicable at least Jn~)lhr as thc application or thc limitation on thc height the tower is concerned, wouldn't you agree'? 57) In fact. these regulations regarding communication towers did not even come into~ cxi.~tcncc until 1992 through 1995. isn't that true'? 58) 'l'he next proposed change is to Sub-section 5.6. and that changes the limitation From the testing of passenger vehicles and light trucks to allow the testing oran)' motor vehicles. is that right? 59) So under that provision. Ford or an)' operator, for that matter, could test an)' kind 4 of motor ,.'chicle. without limitation on type. is that correct? 60) .'4o Ford or any operator could test anything from pas.~ngcr vehicles to mililar',! tanks, motorcycles, heavy earth-moving equipment to jcl posvcred cars. isn't that correct'? 61) This proposed .~ction also limits the testing of "high performance vehicles" t0 daylight testing, is that correct'? 62) continuum': Could you give us a definition of"high perlbrmancc vehicles" at both ends of thc 63) Could you tell us ss'hat the standard is for measuring "dasiight hours~ ssithm th~. meaning of thc proposed change'?. 64~ Follow up questions may be needed to sho~ that there i.~ no ohjectke standards or criteria established for the ultimate enforcement of the provision. ] 651 Did/the staff make thc determination that the propo.~d change ss'as a substantial change becau~- of thc chan?e in intensit.v of u.~': I Reference to Section 2.7.3.$.1 2 I 66~ Did the staff make the determination that the prol~d change xsas a substantial change becau..~' the change ~,.ould be incompatible with thc adjacent land u.~'.' I Reference to Section 2.7.3.5.1 8 I 67 ) A determination that the change i~, a %ub.~tantial change" means that thc application must bc pn,cessed pursuant to Sections 2.7.3. I and "7 ~-" .... v._. is that correct? 68~ If the language of the Pi'l) Ordinance is to Ix, changed, as in this cam. it is necessary t~ h~llos~' the same procedures as for amending the zoning atlas, is that correct?:[ Reference to .~cction 2.7.3.5.5 I 69) I)o you knos,.- thc procedure that must be follov,'ed for changing the zoning atlas'? 70~ When you ch:rage thc zoning atlas, two readings of thc ordinance are required. isn't that correct': 71) The applicant lbr this proposed change is thc County. isn't that correct'? 72) Mr. Donald W. Arnold is thc Director of your department isn't he? 73) Mr. Arnold is shown as the agent of the of the on thc application, isn't he. 74) Do you have a copy of the application available to you'? 1 1 Thc application is incomplete is it not': In fact it is not even signed is h? No~ let me turn your attention to the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 77) Are you familiar with the Comprehensive Land Use Plan? 78) Would you agree with me that every act providing for a development order or zonin~ must be consistent with the comprehensive Land Use Plan? ~ 79} llas the Collier Count)' Comprehensive Land Use Plan received final certification? 80) What is the land use designation of the subject property on the l,and Use Plan? 81) Thc property's current zoning classification is to l)evelopment, subject to Exhibit 1 of Ordinance 84-8. is that correct. "PI]I)" Planned I~nit 82} Would you agree with mc that one of the critical policies under the Comprehensive Land Usc Plan is the protection of the natural resource systems as discussed in the Plan~'s Overview at page LU-I-207 83) 'lhosc systems i,~cludc habitat fi~r fauna, do they not? '~' 84) Il'the proposed changes were such as to disrupt the habitat of the endangered Ihuqa in the area. that xvould be inconsistent with thc Comprehensive Plan. ~vould it not? 85) Objective 2 on page I.U-I-12 of thc Plan as amended through Ordinance 95-12. of March of i 995. provides that no development order shall be issued unless the required public facilities meet the requirements of thc Conct, rrency Management Systems. is that correct'? 86) .',;o. if this Ordinance that is N:ing discussed loda)' ix a development order, then unless the concurrency requirements are satisfied, the passage of the ordinance would be inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan. is that correct'.' 87} Policy 3. I sets one of thc minimum rcquircmcnts as mitigating incompatible land uses. does il not'? 88! Would you agree ~ ith mc that h~:ating an industrial area next to a rural residentifil area is incompatible': ..\nd in that regard, noi.~ prolecm~n is deemed a priority' consideration, is il not'? 6 90~ In fact. v.'ouldn't you agree that locating an industrial facility next to a wildliti: preserve for an endangered species is incompatible? Would you look at the Rural - Industrial District explanation on page lA J-l-40 ;of 91) thc Plan'? ~3,'ould you also look at thc Industrial Under Criteria on page i.U-I -27 in the Activity Center'? When those provisions are compared and contrasted, it shows that the testing facilities arc permitted in the Activity ('enters but not m the Rural Industr, al Areas. }sn't that true': 93 ) I. ~ses found incompatible with existing uses are not to be permitted tinder thc I lan. isn't that true': [ Reference to Policy 5.2 } 94) Doesn't the Comprehensive Plan mandate that new development be compatil4le with and complimentary to surrounding land uses'? [ Reference to Policy 5.4 PaRe LU-I-19~:iI 95) Isn't it rue that the Comprehen.nive Plan discouraRes industrial traffic from trax'cling through residential areas? [ Reference to criteria fi~r Industrial Under Criteria on Page LU-I-27 ] 96) Doesn't De Soto Boulevard travel right through a residential area to get to testing center on the site? 97) I)oesn'l Objccti,,e 6.8 sa)' that the County vdll protect natural reservations I'r(~ the impact of surrounding development? [ Reference to page £'4-32 ] 98) Doesn't Objective 7.3 mandate that the County shall develop and implement programs tbr protecting ... animal wildlife? [ Rcti:rence to page C-I-35 ] 99) Did the Count). undertake an)' studies regarding this particular application and the negative impacts that might arise under its implementation relative to the nearby wildlili:. including thc Florida panther? [ Reference Objective i.3 Conservation Element PaRe 3 of 9 1001 We ma)' have to pursue the "studies" that he ma3,. claim and show that the~' were not in the file and available to the public. 101'} In connection with some of these areas that the County is not able to detine, such as all types of ','chicles. "high perlbrmance" vehicles, da)' light hours and the like. doesn't the Com~ehensive l.and [.'se Plan require that the County establish standards for the permitted uses and maximum building height'? ] Reference Industrial Under Criteria Pages LU-l- 27 and 28; NOTE: this section is under the Activity Center Provision [ 102) Do you know ifthe property leased by Ford includes all ofthe area ofthe "PUD'~T Planned [Init Development as described in Ordinance 84-8? 103) Do you know if the site proposed for the 500 fi~ot communications tower is or/ Ford's leased land or is it to be constructed on lands outside the property leased by Ford? [ Depending on the response to the question, tie the answer to the rationale for the amendment. ] 104) I f the propo.~'fi is adopted and thc 500 fix)t communications tower is conslructcd. is the use of the tower going to be limited to the Vehicle Evaluation Center': 105) Is there going to be a restriction on co-location and. if so. what is the restriction going to be`>, 106) If thc tower can be u~d by someone other than in connection with thc Vehicle Evaluation Center. wouldn't that be a violation or at least an extension of thc "single purpo.~. special usc" provision of Article IV. Section 4. I of Ordinance 84-8? [ Reference to page 4-1 of Exhibit ! to the Ordinance. ] 107) Wouldn't it appropriate and consistent with the Ordinance to adopt an amendment to the Plan which is described on Exhibit C to the Ordinance to show the location of thc 500 roost communications tower? [ Reference to page 4-1 of Exhibit I, Section 4.2 Project Plan. ] 1 - Linda S. Weinland I live on 38th Ave SE, approx 900 ft. W of De Soto within hearing range of the Ford Eval. Center I have been, for the past 18 years, Professor of Biology and Ecology at the Collier County Campus of ECC In addition, I worked for approx 3 years as a consultant to the Collier County Natural Resources Management Department, during which time I assisted in the investigation and analysis of all the major biotopes in undeveloped Col. Co. In the course of my work I drove and/or walked through much of the count),. What I learned led me to purchase property in my neighborhood. I have also, since 1991, served as a member of the Board of Directors of the NAITHLORIENDUN WILD. SANCI'. LET ME STATE AT TIlE OUTSET 1. I am NOT AN ENEMY OF (AGAINST) the Ford Eval Facility 2. I neither wish nor intend by my actions to drive Ford from Collier County (as has been erroneously stated about people in my neighborhood by poorly informed members of the local media) 3. I AM, however, PRO-NEIGHBORHOOD. NOW I WISH TO ADDRESSS THE ISSUES AT HAND THE AREA IN QUESTION 1. Members of my residential neighborhood along DeSoto Blvd. have been good and caring stewards of our land, which contains some of the finest native communities in SW Fla. We have purchased property and moved there for the peace, tranquillity and beauty of the rural environment. The area is noted for its natural history amenities and for its natural RESERVATIONS, including the Fla. Panther Natl. Wildlife Refuge and the greater than 200 acre Naithloriendun Wildlife Sanctuary. 12B 1 3. In addition, surrounding the Ford Evaluation Center are ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE WETLANDS, clearly depicted on the County's Land Use Map, including, THE STUMPY STRAND and LUCKY LAKE STRAND. 4. Testing conditions currently are PERIODICALLY BOTHERSOME, but not yet intolerable. OUR CONCERNS: 1. NOISE POLLUTION from accelerated vehicular testing. Among the many UNKNOWNS are types of vehicles, noise levels, 2. REDUCFION IN QUALITY OF LIFE for current and future residents of the area of GG Estates along DE SOTO BLVD. o DECLINE IN CURRENT AND FUTURE PROPERTY VALUES in an area potentially afflicted with extreme levels of sound pollution. WILDLIFE. The threatened Fla. Black Bear, endangered Panther, numerous permanent and migratory birds (among other species)utilize the area. Previously released information by the FLA. GAME AND FRESHWATER FISH COMMISSION has documented that at least half a dozen black bears and panthers have been tracked INSIDE the existing fence of the Ford Facility. I submit the following documents recording the data and concerns. INCREASED TRAFFIC ALONG DE,.qDTO BLVD. resulting from increased testing will adversely affect residents, school children, wildlife, and FAMILY activities such as jogging, bicycling, walking, etc. ~,. The EDUCATIONAL VALUE of the area as a BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE AND NATURAL RESERVATION will decline. School children, teachers, and college students f'rom throughout Collier County have visited and studied this rural area as an ecological classroom. The richness and diversity of native species of flora and fauna are indeed priceless educational treasures. We have no pertinent data on the effects of high performance vehicular noise on, for example, the reproductive behavior of native animal species. The decline or loss of such species would indeed be tragic. · 12B 1 FINALLY, This is a case in which it appears that an OUT-OF-STATE, MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR CORPORATION may be granted unduly favorable treatment to the detriment of our RURAL MIDDLE INCOME RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. I HOPE THAT YOU, THE COUNTY COMMISSION MEMBERS, WILL HAVE THE: FORESIGHT THE WISDOM, AND ESPECIALLY THE COURAGE, TO DO THE RIGHT THING AND RECOMMEND AGAINST THE EMENDATION OF ORDINANCE 84-8. (I will be happy to meet with any of you at our mutual convenience to further discuss our concerns.) i I I I I III~1 II .............. - l,inda S. Weinland I live on 38'h Ave SI',', approx 900 ft. W of De Soto within hearing range of the Ford Eval. Center I have been, for the past 18 years, Professor of Biology and L:cology at the Collier County Campus of ECC In addition, I worked for approx 3 years as a consultant to the Collier County Natural Resources Management Department, during which time I assisted in the investigation and analysis of all the major biotopes in undeveloped Col. Co. In the course of my work ! drove and/or walked through much of the county. What I learned led me to purchase property in my neighborhood. I have also, since 1991, served as a member of the Board of Directors of the NAFHILORIENDUN WILD. SANC]'. LET ME STATE. AT THE OUTSET 1. I am NOT AN ENEMY OF (AGAINST) the Ford Eval Facility 2. I neither wish nor intend by my actions to drive Ford from Collier County (as has been erroneously stated about people in my neighborhood by poorly informed members of the local media) 3. I AM, however, PRO-NEIGHBORHOOD. NOW l WISH IO ADDRF~3S THE ISSUF$ AT HAND THE AREA IN QUESI-ION 1. Members of my residential neighborhood along DeSoto Blvd. have been good and caring stewards of our land, which contains some of the finest native communities in SW Fla. We have purchased property and moved there for the peace, tranquillity and beauty of the rural environment. The area is noted for its natural history amenities and for its natural RESERVATIONS, including the Fla. Panther Natl. Wildlife Refugo and the greater than 200 acre Naithloriendun Wildlife Sanctuary. 1 l 3. In addition, surrounding the Ford Evaluation Center are ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE WETLANDS, clearly depicted on the County's Land Use Map, including, THE STUMPY STRAND and LUCKY LAKE STRAND. 4. Testing conditions currently are PERIODICALL~RSOME, but not yet intolerable. OUR CONCERNS: 1. NOISE POLLU'IION from accelerated vehicular testing. Among the many UNKNOWNS are types of vehicles, noise levels, duration and timing of tests, ETC. , 2. REDUCTION IN QUALITY OF LIFE for current and future residents of the area of GG Estates along DE SC)TO BLVD. 3. DECLINE IN CURRENT AND FUTURE PROPERTY VALUES in an area potentially afflicted with extreme levels of sound pollution. WILDLIFE. The threatened Fla. Black Bear, endangered Panther, numerous permanent and migratory birds (among other species)utilize the area. Previously released information by the FLA. GAME AND FRESHWATER FISH COMMISSION has documented that at least half a dozen black bears and panthers have been tracked INSIDE the existing fence of the Ford Facility. INCREASED TRAFFIC ALONG DESOTO BLVD. resulting from increased testing will adversely affect residents, school children, wildlife, and FAMILY activities such as jogging, bicycling, walking, etc. The EDUCATIONAL VALUE of the area as a BIOLOGICAL RESOURCE AND NATURAL RESERVATION will decline. School children, teachers, and college students from throughout Collier County have visited and studied this rural area as an ecological classroom. The richness and diversity of native species of flora and fauna are indeed priceless educational treasures. We have no pertinent data on the effects of high performance vehicular noise on, for example, the reproductive behavior of native animal species. The decline or loss of such species would indeed be tragic. 7. The 500 ft. tower would indeed be visible. I challenge Mr. Arnold to show me a 500 ft. native tree in Collier Co. Ill Illin II III I I II I II ............. III I I 12B FINALLY, This is a case in which it appears that an OUT-OF-STATE, MULTI-BILLION DOI.LAR CORPORATION may be granted unduly favorable treatment to the detriment of our RURAL MIDDLE INCOME RESIDENTIAI. NEIGHBORHOOD. I HOPE THAT YOU, THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS, WILl.. HAVE THE: FORESIGHT THE WISDOM, AND ESPECIALLY 'l'ttE COURAGE, TO DO THE RIGHT THING AND RECOMMEND AGAINST THE EMENDATION OF ORDINANCE 84-.8. I will be happy to meet with any of you at our mutual convenience to further discuss our concerns. Ot't'iccs and Nalure Center ~ 1450 lVJcrrihuc Drive * lNaplcs, Florida 33942- 813-262-0304 (loci/cd o(f Goodl¢c(¢ Rold i! 14(h A~,¢nuc N(~r~h! 1 August 19, 1983 Colonel Alfred B. Oevereaux. Jr. District Engineer Jacksonville District U. S. Corps of Engineers P. O. Box 4970 Jacksonville, Flortda 32232 Re: Permit Application No. 83M-1317 CMC Development Corp. proposes to construct an automobile test facility immediately east of Golden Gate Estates in Collier County, Florida. Dear Colonel Oevereaux: We have reviewed the Public Notice associated with above referenced application, the Planned Unit Development documents and water management plans produced by the applicant, and the response from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) under provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act. We are in basic agreement with FWS that wetland and water management impacts have been minimized. While it appears that wet- land plants and the hydrology of the area will not be significantly altered, the wildlife in the general area will be largely precluded from over$~Oiacres of viable and possibly critical habitat by the perimeter fence proposed by the applicant. · . We are especially concerned for possible encroachments on the range affd habitat of the endangered Florida panther of which a small and apparently reproducing population are known l~ the Faka- hatchee Strand a short distance to the east. This, together with the fact that FWS has reported apparent panther signs within the area to be fenced, clearly raises the possibility that the subject tract is used occasionally if not regularly by the endangered panther. We have noted in the response from FWS their concerns for potential impact on the panther and other listed species and their recommendation that the Corps initiate consultation with FWS in the matter of endangered and threatened species. Based on this infor- mation, it is The Conservancy's position that consultation with FWS be undertaken and approval for the project withheld until FWS indicates that project will not create impacts that wll: further endanger the maintenance and recovery of the Florida panther popu- lation in the Fakahatchee Strand. ENVi RONh4 ENTAL PROTECT1OI,i · LAND PRESERVATION · I,:C()LUGICAL .... I IIII I I II I III I ............. , · ,.,,,,.. iii I I I I I I I I II I 12B I Colonel Alfred B. Oevereaux, Jr. Page 2 August 19, 1983 We appreciate the opportunity to comment on this application and also would appreciate advice as to your decision relative to con- sultation with FWS. Edw Pr~ n J. Putzell, Jr. sident EJP:eh bc' Mark Benedict 12B ADDiYREVISED SUBJVllTFAL [ 2.897: 2.896- -t 2.895- t - t 2.894, BLACK BEAR RADIO LOCATIONS tt 't tt tt t t tt t t t t t t ttt t t t t I ! c r, - .: 2 .... EAST-WEST UTM : 12B 1 Z I 2896.0 2895.0 2894.0 I l 2893.0 I ! 449,1 PANTHER RADIO LOCATIONS l Il I I I I I I I I 44.9.5 449.9 EAST-WEST UTM 2277618 OR: 2386 PG: 3193 RI: ~11 O0C-,TO Ret;fi: lit 8991 ACCESS EASEMEN~z ~P ESS EASE.,M~ENT, made and entered into this ~ day of , 19.~/.~, by COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the state of Florida, whose mailing address is 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, Florida 34112, its successors and assigns, as Grantor to GOLDEN GATE CONGREGATION OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, INC., a Florida Non-Profit corporation, whose mailing address is 1962 45th Street SW, Naples, FL 34116, as Grantee, (Wherever used herein the terms "Grantor" and "Grantee" include all the parties Io this instrument and their respective heirs, legal representatives, successors and assigns.) WITNESSETH: Grantor, for and in consideration of TEN DOLLARS ($10.00) and other valuable consideration paid by the Grantee, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby conveys, grants, bargains and sells unto the Grantee, a perpetual, non-exclusive access easement, license, and privilege for access on the following described lands (the "Easement Area") located in Collier County, Florida. to wit: See attached Exhibit "A" which is incorporated herein by reference. Subject to easements, restrictions, and reservations of record. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee, together with the right to enter upon said lands thereon by a common driveway for the purposes of accessing Grantee's house of worship Grantee shall also have the right to construct or install improvements or modifications in the Easement Area, including, but not limited to, pavement, drainage, lighting, signage and landscaping, provided that Grantor shall approve Grantee's plans prior to construction. Grantee shall be responsible for the maintenance of improvements constructed or installed by Grantee, unless othe~vise agreed in writing, by Grantor. If Grantor determines Ihat a safety or operational problem, or both, exists from Grantee's utilization of the Access Easement, Grantor shall provide Grantee with written notice that the Access Easement shall terminate within thirty (30) days. In such event, Grantor shall not be required to compensate Grantee for any improvements constructed or installed by Grantee in the Easement Area. Grantor and Grantee are used for singular or plural, as the context requires. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused these presents to be executed date and year first above written. DATED: ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCk;Clerk By:~ COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA · ~. ~/ 1.,} Deputy Clerk BY:~ ~~m~ EASEMENT DESCRIPTION: - , ....... ;...'.~. ' ',"i '""; i'; ''~' '";i-,! ,"~ ,.l~'~' ~,~,; :- ~, v.:"t: ' . , ' ' ,, ',. '~ , ' '. 1',~.!: ~,, , , -, -, .., . , ~ ~ , ·" ,__ _ _ ",L_"L ~ T-½!~ ,:: '" FFT'?, , ,:- ri,'F ','~"F'~ ;'~; !', :,- ,~' 'r ~'- 'F,',',,~ t GOLDEN GATE ESTATES UNI~' NO. 4, :. ~'! , ;!.'i,i ;; ltl Ii ", f ; .... ';~ · ,c,,~,¥-.-; 7') ~,,,) (l/l';I IJ~;,IVf'.~ ' '; .rii? ri/F' P ~:×,,,,,,T ,,^', *** OR: 2386 PG: 3194 *** KETC. .OF DESCRIPTION 16A 1 GOLDEN GATE BOULEVARD · '. ..;;: i .... ! [ ,'/tP/, -' r:',~"'O SCALE I ~NGH - 40 FEET 0 ~0' 80' SURVEYORS NOTEg : I)~IR · ~OUND 1/2' IRON UNLESS SHOWN OTHERWISE 21BEARINGS PER RECORDED PLA[. 31SIR-SET 112' IRON ROD eLBOSg4 KINGDOM HALL OF JEHOVAH'S WITNESSES, tRACT 1 , 330. 13 ' $! 8~'40'50'E TRACT[, 96 Permit No. 98-2 PERMIT FOR CARNIVAL EXHIBITION STATE OF FLORIDA : COUNTY OF COLLIER: WHEREAS, LaBelle Longhorn Booster Club, has made application to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, for a permit to conduct a carnival or exhibition; and WHEREAS, LaBelle Longhorn Booster Club, has presented to the Board sufficient evidence that all criteria for the issuance of a permit to ccnduct a carnival or exhibition as set forth in Chapter 10, Article II, Amusements and Entertainments, of the Collier County Code have been satisfied and that such carnival or exhibition will be conducted according to lawful requirements and conditions; and WHEREAS, said LaBelle Longhorn Booster Club, has requested a waiver of the Surety Bond, Carnival Fee and Occupational License; and NOW, THEREFORE, THIS FERMIT IS HEREBY GRANTED TO LaBelle Longhorn Booster Club to conduct a carnival or exhibition on February 9 through 15, 1998, in acccrdance with the terms and conditions set forth in the petitioner's application and all related documents, attached hereto and incorporated herein for the following described property: (See attached Exhibit "A") WITNESS my hand as Chairman of said Board and Seal of said County, attested by the Clerk of C©urts in and for said County this day of J_~~_ , 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Cl'erk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: Marjorg[e ~.-. Student BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS: COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: B. 13ERR'~ C~ir~ Lois 1-24. Block "B". Immokalec S/D. Plal Book I. Page 60. as recorded in lhe Public Records of Coil/ct Counly. Florida Copy: ('2; Cotmt~ Mana~ger PETITIONER'S NAME: LA ~ ~ ' D , PROP~TY O~'S N~E: ~ L~ DESCRI~ION OF S~E~ PROP~y: CURRENT ZONING: __~ NATURE OF PETITION: CURRENT USE: ~ THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS INCLUDED IN THIS PETITION. TION, SEE REVERSE SIDE. ) 3.e.1) 3.e.2). 3. e. 3) __.______ Comments: 3,a. (FOR Exp~ANA- 3. e. ? )_______ 3.e.8) 3.e.9)~ SIGNATURE OF P~TITIONER DATE REVIEWED by Board of County Commissioners: Approved: Disapproved: Conditions of Approval: SIGNATURE OF COUNTY MANAGER % FEB 0 3, 1998 1 6 A ~ BOOTH Z~OTI~ICATION l~OP.~. FOR TEmPORARy EFENTS Name of booth: ~ Person in charge of booth: ~ Types of f, oo_d o.r beveraae .=o ke serye~: ., , 2 Florida Ad~inistrative Code, Chapter 10D-13 requires all food to come from an approved source. All food storage, 9reparanion and utensil cleaning for this event shall not be done in private homes. ~ Ldcatiun of advanced food preparation:~ Hoe will food be transport~zon9 Method of kepis_g, food/.hot and/or cold at event sate: rood must be protected from dust, insects, flies, coughs, sneezes. How wil~ you provide this prot~ction~ n~. type of structure. ~ ~ . ~-cribe - ~~W~o c~on? Describe Adequate facilities and supplies shall be provided for employee, handwash_in,g, ~ow will y~u provide this? For Information and Assistance contact: Enviconmental Health & Engineering Oept- (813) 643- ¢gFEB 0 1998 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Collier County Commissioner Board Members LaBelle Longhorn Booster Club Permission to hold a fund raiser. We, the LaBelle Longhor~ Booster board members would like to have your permission to a fund raiser, this being a carnival in the I~m~okalee area. Our organization is affiliated with the Pop Wax-net Football youth groups, we are a none profit organization rely on donations and fund raisers, to pay for the e~enses that Pop Warner groups accrue. The In~nokalee Pop Warner was approached to see if they would like to do a fund raiser like this, before we approached this fund raiser in their territory. We hope that you will gave us your permission as we are in greaE debt, to pay for equipment. This is one fund raiser that we have held in the LaBelle area, which proved to be one of our best fund raisers. We would also like to ask that the application fee, occupational license fee and surety bond be waived. We have made arrangements with Collier County Sheriffs office for security (Jeff Cox), Holland Disposal for Portaletz (Krista), Immokalee disposal for dumpsters (Linda), and Immokalee Fire Dept. (Mr. Rodgers). W~ have gotten permisoion from Mr. Gaston, who owns the said p~'operty (#51190120001, Lots 4-24, Blk B, on 1 Str and Corner of Main St., zone # C-4,) to rent ~his property for zhis event. I did ask him for a copy of his warranty deed to give to the to your board, however he did say, he did not have it, it was w~th the barnk & he would have to get an attorney to do so. However, Mr. Gaston did state that he did not have =o provide this information to Sam Galloway Car dealer, that just used his lot, all that he provide was the legal description that I have listed in the above. I did ask him for his subdivision number, he stated all the information he had on his tax paper, is what,s listed above. We, hope that without this deed, that you will give us your permission to hold this fund raiser. The LaBelle Longhorn Booster Club FEB 0 a 1998 2 ~ ' IMMOKALEE FIRE CONTROL DISTRICT 16A 2 CI'III!;F l.C. NUTLEY 01-30-98 I~Belle Longhorn Rooster Club P.O. Box 2335 LaBelle PI. 33975 Dear Kelly, The l~okalee Fire Control Dist. will provide fire protection for the carnival to be held at N. 1st st. ~d E Main St. on February 13,14 & 15, 1998. Please let me know ~he times so we can schedule an tnsp~tton prior to your opening. o F.~ ~~~~rs Fire Inspector GF. NF. JLALOFHt'~f~&~J,,,2~II ~00'~9~d FEB 0 3 1998 HOLT"A-t~eS PORTABLE TOZLETS, ZRC. P.O. BOX 3032 8055 I~,LZBUDRIVE LABELLE, FL 33975 (941)675-7555 January 30, 1998 LaBelle Longhorn Booster Club P.O. Box 2335 LaBelle, FL 33975 We agree to provide the LaBelle Longhorn Booster Club with 4 single portable toilets for the carnival in Immokalee for the dates of February ]3, 14, ]5, and possibly the 16th. The cost of these units will be $75.00 each. This fee covers the cost of rental, servicing, travel, and any repairs that may need to be completed to the unit after the toilet has been returne~ to us. · Vice President ~ Holland's Portable Toilets, Inc. ~00'3~ffd W~U~ 3']']38t~9 WO~ PAOO'J~ ~g ~c]~ ~4~ L~eko -' ~teve Ltsko 3911 Coope~. Louollvtile 0}1 4443E COVERAGES 16A 2 ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THi ¢IimtIFICAltE :; HOLDER, mil CERTIFICA'll DOES NOT'RlVlEND, EX'I~ND OR ; .. _AL_ T_.E R__TH.._E.~LE~I~. E,.. ,A~_ .O_R P .E~ .B.~., ,T~..~ ~t~J:l. t~ !, .~. Z ~.[.L~...; 1 Loeltto~l J TH;$ LI,I3IUTY L~SLIRANCE IN~LUOES AS AN ADDITIONAL INSUR~O WiTH RE~I:~CT TO LLI, BIUTY AFUSING OLFI' OF THE NAMED INSUREDS' OPERATION(S): U) 1'l-t8 FAIR OR EXPOSITION ~TION, SPOI~I$ORING ORGANIZATION OR COMMITTEE; (2) TtIE OWNER OR LESSEE OF 'rue SITE; (3) A MUNK::IPAUTY GRANTING THE NAMED INSURED PERMISSION TO OPERATE A C. :,J~.IVAL :ERTIFICAT~ HOLDER ...... ............................... .............. 7 ~ 9 |4:54 FROM LAB£LL£ FARM IIII PAGE,001 FEB 0 3 1998 16A 2 As the sponsor of this event you are responsible to notify all food vendors of the temporary food service requirements. Failure to comply may subject the booths to be closed for public health reasons. Do you understand this completely? Yes No I certify that to the best of my knowledge and belief all of the statements contained herein and on any attachment~ are true, correct, complete, and made in good faith. I understand that these re~%~lations include food intended for service to the public regardless of whether there is a charge for the food. I agree to assume responsibility for this event and certify that said business wall be oonducted in compliance with the Florida Administrative Code, Chapter 10D-13. Signature of sponsor's agent Date: ~00'39~d I,,1~1::::1..t 3993~U'I NO~I..I e FEB 0 3 1998 Name o~ event 16A 2 Address of event ~ (~ Number of food and beverage booths Estimated number of attenders ~xpected at the event at one time? I - Number of toilets to be provided: Portable: Male ( ~ ) Female Per]uanent: Male ( ) Female Method of toilet waste disposal: Describe method of liquid kitchen waste disposal: Describe containers and method of solid waste disposal (garbage): Number of solid waste disposal containers provided: Describe facilities and method of hand washing: Describe facilities and method of utensil washing, rinsinq ,and So rc of potable ate=: Ji.(+u For information and assistance contact: Environmental Health & Engineering Department (813) 643-8499. FEB 0 3 1998 16A 2. Excerpt from Ordinance No. 75-11 Filed Secretary of State 3/6/75 3. Application and Fe~ for Permit. A minimum of twenty (20) days before occupying the carnival or exhibition site, an application for a permit shall be submitted to the County Manager in four (4) copies accompanied by: a. A surety bond in the penal sum of $2,500, issued by a company authorized to issue such bonds in Florida, conditioned upon the operator comply%ng with each provision of this Ordinance and subject to forfeiture under'the terms provided in Paragraph 8 hereinbelow. b. k~idence of current public liability insurance coverage, issued by a company authorized to do business in Florida, in the minimum amount of $100,000 for any one person and $300 000 for any one incident. ' c. A non-refundable fee of $200. d. A current occupational license issued by the Collier County Tax Collector, and e. Including the following information: 1) The name and headquarters address(es) of the carnival or exhibition company(ies) with a direct or indirect financial interest; name(s) and address(es) of any sponsoring organization(s), and the name and local address of the applicant representing the carnival or exhibition company(ies); 2) A description of the every activity to be conducted such as but not limited to, menageries; circus and side-show perform- ances; amusement, merry-go-round and other ride activities; food and drink dispensing fac%lities; booths for conduct of games of skill or chance not prohibited by State la~ to be open to the public for an admission or participation fee and number of persons to operate the activities; 3) Name, identification and social security number of each person accountable for the operation of each activity; 4) A description and sketch of the site showing the location of each activity proposed, the location and number of sanitary facilities; parking facilities, and provision for lighting and public ~ater; 5) Application for Food Establishment Operating Permit from the County Health Department as required by ordinance 74-45. 6) The plan for refuse, garbage, debris, and sewage disposal during and after operation of the circus or exhibition. 7) Provisions for traffic control, fire safety and security precat~tions; 8) The date and time each activity is to be conducted and concluded; 9) Written approval from the o~ner of the property authorizing ~he use of this premises for such carnival activity. 10) Legal description of property to be utilized. E80'39~d FEB 0 3 1998 SC:~I 86, 6~- NtJ[' II~,.?' -]-3.0292 Temporary Food Service Events :- ~ _ ,~.. un:: :'.ac ~t.:: :h.,n :htee .. . ~ ~ ~ ..... , ( ,ma.y~ co~olet,eo _o!~lv,?__y_v tclznhone, in health ~nlt shall k~eo ~ record ~otifi~atlo~3 teCe]vc~ for Dro~d fO~ ~rvice tve~t~n~ ~hal]~coviCe a~o~o~tiate ~ucaC~onal ~teC~a~ to thc ~venc t21 ~aclliC~c~ ' ~pc~fic ~he fo~ :crvl~e ooera~on :s co be conducc~ :hall by ba~ on t~c- t~e f~ that l~ to bc ~patcd o~ se:v~, t~e ]eq~ of thc b~ con, utter aC the cem~rary~aclliCv~ ?on-~tentl~llv ~4zardo~3 f~o~ ~r~k, the ~b) ~crhea~c°tecclon shall be ~i~ ac 411 f~ 3ervlc~ ooerat:on~ Whcn f~ I= reoa~ oc ttione![ on Drcmi~es. (~1 · h~en ~tentl~h~zacdou, a~ Ce~cv f~ ~ecvice cv~nt~ ~all (4~l :~ :~rv~..,: ~ccoc~ancc with O:ov~o.nL.of ~cc:;ar, !OO- ice ~n~C.h~ 5~ ~hich Will ~0~ ' .... uo/ovcc ~=.u rc~ only ~-~. CCu~he~ o~ Cub~d fo:re. Th~ 2O C00 · 3DUd vlth ~ce ~hcn: I)) ~, ~totac. facility the accu~.~tion of va~,r_.~urlnq .Icl Thc storage ~acllit~ ~:Vicc escaoilS~nt, .a ulenxil Va~him~ ~lll not be r~ir~, exceoc thatr aA ~,erV~ng ute~ils~re ~lncalh~ in the.-- e~:abll~nC a~ u~ to re~ace ~e that c f~ on e~j~ - -~ ,hall ~~[o~e ha~aahlnq. av~[~ab%e for ha~ashln~ a~ ha~ ~rvln~. such ~ - kegt clean a~ the f~ w''' ~ls~.:~ of in ~ ~n.tr that will nat c~eac~ fl2] .r!~ construction sh~.. bc of dUtdb!c ~CeCial. . covjr~ with olaCfot~. ~uc[~a:d$, -- ~t~,i/ac ~uita~le ~terial su~ as a c~qUired, *~ con~t:uc:~ o( ~, canvas o: other ~ ~ect the lnCc:to~ of the es abllf~r~ FEB 0 1998 · - v' ~.. 39938U9 WO~ 6 ;-~1 ~b, bg NUf 2 a~', JRJ-,,O- o 9:85P, M LT PAT FNLLEN SSB 793§]78 LAW ENFORCEMENT SPECIAL DETAIL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this~_ day of' ."~"/~t'~, . , l~.o~by and between the Collier County Sheriff's Office, DON HUNTER., SI-{ERIFF of.._C..ollier Co_u.n~f, Napl s,, Florida, hereinafter referred to as "CCSO" and ./...-,~..,_J2,~.]~C ~:)~'?~.v'~" ~'/C/L~, ,e Florida. hereinafter referred to as "CONTRACTOR', both of whom shall be mi'erred' to as the 'PARTIES'. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS. the CONTRAC'TOR desires to obtain special Law Enforcement Services at:_ /dl~ C'~-c~' /~ .~_.,,',..,,,,,,.~o]/,,,~ ~cO ~1 for the purpose of (identify event, if any): d'.A, "-i ,Jo.,I in Collier County, Fk)dda, and; WHEREAS. the CCSO has agreed to render to the CONTRACTOR professional law enforcement service, and the CONTRACTOR is desirous or' contracting for such services upon the terms and conditions hereinafter set fodh: and WHEREAS, (he CONTRACTOR is desirous of providing Law Enforcement Services through a contractual relationship with CCSO; and WHERE_AS, the Sheriff hereby agrees to provide such security and law enfoccement as provided herein; NOW, THEREFORE. in consideration of the sums hereinafter set forth and [or other good and valuable considerations, the receipt and legal sufficiency of which are hereby acknow~ed<2ed. it is hereby agreed as foriows: /..oo · 3DUd For the purpose above, the Sheriff shall provide to the Contractor (# of) cerl~m~l Deputies at the place capfi.,oned above. I:m~Jween the hours of. "'7 ,Dr-~ _ and I1_ ~,"D~ _ on ~ /3-/"/').,( [date(s)]. A schedule of specific ass~nments for Deputies assigned under this agreement is attached herelo and marked "Exhibit A."Op Such law enforcement Deputies shall perform normal/law enfoccement dutie., to provide for the hearth and sectJrity olr persons in the immediate area of the al:>ove-captioned event or location(s). At all times perW~ent to this contract, the law enforcement Deputies shaft be assigned by and remain under the control of the Office of the Sheriff of Collier Counh~. Don Hunter. Sheriff. Ownership and maintenance of. equipment used in SpecJal Details are the responsibility of the Collier Counby Sheriff's Office and equipment assigned to a Deputy for use in the regular performance of duties shall be used during this Special Detail. All equipment remains the respansibiNty of the assigned Deputy ami ownership remains with the Collier County Sheriff's FEB 0 3 1998 1,A,A 9'~5~!1. LT PAT ?;ULLEN SS@ 7939178 the O~ce o! the She~ff of Collier Counly the actua~ cosl lo the AgenCy the Deputy's lime and one-half houdy rate (overtime), two (2) hour minimum, indud;ng al; applicable Agency expenses such as FICA and worker's compensation coverage commensurate with the current Day plan schedule. 2 The estimated minimum total, based on now available information, iS $.~/.~C:~ - ~,o.~' z~ ~,'subject to final accounting. The estimated maximum total. based on no~/available information, is $ ., subject to Ilnel accounting. If the contracl requires vehicle patrol, the Agency shall be paid ~ per patrol mile, per vehirJe The balance remaining, if any, .~hall be invoiced to the Contractor upon a final lime and mileage accounting being completed by the Sheriff's Office, and shall be paid by the Contractor within five (5) days of receip! of invoice. FINANCIAL ARF~.NG EMENTS._' Full Payment in Advance 50% Deposit Required No Deposit Required/Total Due Upon Billing The Contractor hereby agrees ~o indemnify the Sheriff against any and all claims against the Sheriff or the Offm..e of the Sheriff of Collier County. ads,ag out of the use of the certified law enforcement De~utles. from whatever source or cause, excepting only lhe negligence of Ihs Sheriff or his Deputies. The carries agree that the services provided for here~n are not a guarantee of the health and safety of Ihs patrons a,'lend~ng the above- captioned event, but it is the p?ovision of regular law enforcement services commonly supplied by Ihs O[fice of Ihs She,dff to the citizens of Collier County according IO I::,olic_Jes established by the Sheriff. The parties agree that in Ihs evenl of an off-site emergency requiring the services elsewhere of the law enforcemenl Deputies provided herein, lhat the Sheriff may be required to remove Ihs Deputies to m~.,et any such emergency, W~(hout penaNy ,~herefore, and such removal shall not be deemed a breac_~ of this Agreement. Law enforcement Deputies provided accordmg to the terms hereof shall be paid according to the regular payroll procedures of the Office of the Sheriff, and no funds shall be transferred from the Contraclor to any law enforcement Deputy. but such funds shall be paid directly to the OffiCe of the Shedff of Collier County. 2 39'93BU9 NO ~t .4 FEB 0 3 1998 ~ ,-o~-~o 9:06¢tM LT P~T H~LLEN SScP 7939178 IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the PARTIES hereto execute Ihis instrument on their behalf, at the dates set forth below: COLLIER COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE DON HUNTER Sheriff of Collier County Date Approved as tO form and legal sufficiency subject to exectrtion by the PARTIES: CONTRACTOR BY: j . ~igned Name Date Typed Name Street Address City Telephone Number ~K A//c State 600 · 391::f d 3 3'99 3BU9 140;~ d FEB 0 3 1998 ._..~._/2 _ MF2~O RANDUM Da~e: To: From: Re: February 5, 1998 Ed Kant, Senior Engineer Transportation Administration Eliie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Cooperative Agreement Between the South Florida Water Management District and Collier County for the Removal and Replacement of Bridges on the Cocohatchee Canal Enclosed please find one original of the above referenced document relative ~o Agenda Item ~16B2, as approved by the Board of County Cor:~issioners on February 3, 1998. if you should have any questions, please contact me at: (8406). Thank you. mnclosu~e ('()()1' EIC.\'I'I N' ~: ,\(;REEMENT 1~ E'I ~V E EN TI I E ,,,:,OtI'l'll FI.ORII)A WA'I'EI~ ~IANAC,EMENT I)ISTRICI' A N I) ('()1,1 .I !.~I~, ('OI iN'I'~' ORIGINAL 168 £= 'l'h~s .A(;I~,EE~%IENT ,s entered rote on ........ Ig ~2.. between 'qhe Parties." tile .":,t,uth Florida Water Manage.lent District ("the D'ISTRI(;I"'). and Collier County, a political subdivision off the State oF Florida ("lhe C()UNT¥"). WI'I'N I'Lx, S FYi'II TI IA'F: WI t[:.I,t.F...\S, tile I)1S'I'I~.1(7I' ~s a public corporation of' the State of Florida, created by the Florida I.cgislatu~e and given those pt~,.'crs and rcsp(ms~bll~l~es enumerated m ('hapter 37.1. I"lor~th~ Nlattltcs to include entering ~;~to contracts with public agencies, privale corporalions or olhcr persons, and \VItEI([-~:\S. the I) ISTI{ ICI' has co~]s~ructed a water control structure and has made other channel improvcmenls on lilt ('oct)}latc}lcc ('atl;l[ as a sct'oild phase or the Cocohatchee Watershed Improvement l~lan: and \VIII:'I(I£,RS. improved canal crossings are needed Io adequately convey designed flows; and \\'1 tF. ,',I_:AS. tile (;()LJN'I'Y is scheduling anti designing t, pgrades and improvements to the affected cro.,,sings lo meet desired access and traffic circulation requirements; and \Vhereas. the DISTRICF wishes to assist tile COL/NIT in the cost of the removal and replacement t,£ tile affected crossings so that upon replacement the flow objectives may be ;11 e.t; and \VIIERE/\S. tile COUNTY represents that it is qualified and xvilling to provide thc removal and replacement services: and tile I)lSTRICFwishes to enter inlo an AC,REEMENTwith tile (;OUNT¥: and \VI I[:.RF..,\S. tile ('OI'N'I"~' wart';mis and represents that it has no obligation or indebtedne:,s that \vet,Id ~mt)al, Its ability to I'ulf~ll Ibc terms and conditions of this AC, REEMENT; and L?Ollll;ICt N~I (..'-(,(128- Ih~g,.' I el 9 2 \VItEREA$, the Governing 13oard o£ the I)I$'I'iU(':F at its June 12. 1997 meeting. I~as av,'arded this ,A(;i/Ei,;NIi,:NT to tile ('()lINTY. NO\V TIIERI!FORI:', tile I)ISTRICi' and the ('OIINTY. ~n consideration of the mutual benefits flowing £rom each lo tile other, do hereby agree ~s follows I II ,\IU'I(~I,I.'. I - STATF~5IF~NT OF WORK 'lhe CO[;NTY shall, It~ thc reasonable satisfactmn of Iht I)IN'I'I,II(:I', fully and timely perform all work items described in the "Statement of Work." attached hereto as L:xhlblt ",'\," and made a part of tills A(;IIEEMENT 2¸1 ARTIC'IA-: 2 - TERM OF TIlE AGREEMENT The period of pcrf'ormance of Ibis A(JREESII::NT shall commence on the dale of Ih~s A(;REEMENT and cemt~nuc unl~] the completion of all contractual obligations by Ihe Part~es, but ~n no cvc~t later than three (3) years from the execution date of Ih~s A (; R F. E,M EN I 2¸2 The Part,cs agree thnt ttme ~s of the essence in the performance of each and every obl~g:.mon under iJ~s A(;RI']EMENT ~ 3.1 3.2 A RTICIJ~: 3 - COM PENS ATION/CONS II) ERATION As consideration for plo:'iding the services required by this AGREEMENT. the DISTRICI' shall pay thc COUNTY an amount not to exceed Three Hundred l:ifiy Tlmusand Dollars and No Cents ($350.000.00), as specified in Exhibit "A". Such amount includes tra;'el and other expenses which the CO[JNT'~' may or may not recur and thcrc£ore no additional consideration shall be authorized The COUNTY assumes sole responsibility for all work performed by the COUNTY pursuant to Exhibit ",,\", including but not limited to. the removal of the existing structures and thc design, construction, operation ~d maintenance of the Palm River and Lakeland Avenue Bridges. By providing funding hereunder, the DIS~I~ does not make any warranty, guaranty, or any representation whatsoever regarding ~y of thc work pcrk~rmcd hereunder, including but not limited to the adequacy or sul'fic~ency of all or any part of work described in Exhibit "A". Contract No C-(,{)2:'q- ]';igc 2 of 9 41 168 AR'I'I(iI,E 4 - INV()I('iN(; AND PAYMENT The COIiNTY'S ~nvmce~ shall reference ll~e i)ISTI~i(,I"S ('ontract Number ('-602g and shall be ,'~cnt to tilL: follc),.wng adclrcss. South Florida \Valor Management District [)~v~s~tm ~f' l~rocurcment :md ('onlracl AdlllilllNlr:lll{}n I'O Box 2,16N0 3301 (;un Clul) Road West l'alm l~each, l:l. 33416-4680 The C()I!N'i'Y .should nol submit invoices to any other address al the i)ISTRI(TF. The (;()tiN'I'Y shall submit tile invoices on tile completmn of Tasks 6, 8, and o. pursuant ~() thc :~chcdulc outlined ~n Paragraph 5 0 of thc Statement of Work, attached as Exhibit "A" Each invoice submitted shall be accompansed by a statement from the COUN'I'V'S I'rojecl Manager verifying that the work fk~r which the invoice is rendered has been completed, in addition to adequate documentation to support actual costs ~ncurred ~ncJud~ng coptcs o1' actual paid invmccs The I)ISTRICI' shall pay the full amount o£ tile ~nvoice w~thin thirty (30) days of receipt and acceptance, provided the C()[INTY has performed the work according to the terms and conct~tmns of' tills :',,(]I,tEI']MF. NT. tlowever, failure by the COIJNTY to follow the £oregoing Instruclicms may result in an unavoidable delay of payment by thc I)ISTRICI' 52 ..\I~TI(;i.E 5 - I'I~,(),II,X;i' MANAGEMEN'ITNOTICE The Pro.leer ,Xl;magcl for the I)ISTI~I(51' is Robert A l.aura. I'E, at 3301 (Jun Club Road. West I'alm Beach, I:1 .;3.11(,. telephon¢ (561) 687-6238 The Project Manager for the C()U.,NTY is the Public Works Administrator or Ills designee, at Collier Count)'. County Government Center. 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 3396~: telephone (941) 774-~49-I The l'arties shall direct all matters arising in connection with the per[ormance of this AGI,tEEMENT. other than invoices and notices, to the attention o[ the Project Managers for attempted resolution or action. The Project Manager:; shall be responsible for overall coordinanon and oversight relating to the performance of this AGREEMENT. All t~t~t~ccs, d,2malld:-;, t~r other c(~,mllltllllCallorls to the ('OIINTY trader Ih~s ,?s, GREE,'MENT shall be ~n x,.'rltlng and shall be deemed received if sent by certified Ut)ntlact Nt) ('-(,()28 - [';tgc t of 9 mail, return receipt re¢luesled, lo ('oll~er County l'ublic Works I)ivismn AItn.: Public Works Admir~istrator Counly Governn~ent Center 3301 Tamiami Trail l!ast Naples, FL 2,3062- All nouces to tile I)iWI'Ri(:[' under th~s :\(;I(EEMENT shall be ~n writing and sent by ccrtit~cd mail to South Florida Water Management District [)i,.'isi,'m of Procurement and ('onlract Administration 3301 Gun Club Road P O Box 246~0 Wust Palm Beach, FI. 33416-46~0 The ('OlIN'IT shall also provide a copy of all not:cos to tile i)ISTRI(.q"S' Project ,Manager All nolices required by th~s A(;REEMENTshall he considered delivered tt[~[lt! t't't't'l/)! Should either party ch;rage ~ts address, written notice of such new address shall promptly be sent to tile other party All correspondence to tile I)ISTRICI' under this A(;I(EI.hMENT shall reference thc DISTRI('I% Contract Number C-602g 6 I 6.2 A R i'ICI.E 6 - 'I'1.:1~,51 IN ATION/i*,EM El) I 1.2g If c'~her party fails to f\:lfill its obligations under this A(;REEblENT in a timely and proper manner, thc other party shall have the right to terminate this AGREEMENT by giving written notice oF any deficiency. The party in default shall then have thirty (30) calendar days from receipt oFnoticeto correct thc deficiency. I~thedefauhing party hils to correct the deficiency within this time, this AGREEMENT shall terminate at the expiration of the thirty (30) day lime period 'File I)ISTI?,ICI' may terminate this AGREEMENT at any Ilnle for convenience upon thirty (30) calendar days prior written notice to the COIINq~'. The performance of work under this AGREEMENT may be terminated by thc I)ISTRI~ in accordance with this clause in whole, or from time to time in part, whenever the DIS~i~ shall determine that such termination is in tim best interest of ll~e DISTRi~. Any such termination shall be cf'footed by deliver' lo tl~e C()IIN'I~' of a Notice of Termination specifying the extent to which performance of work trader the AGREEMENT is terminated, and the date upon which such termination becomes effective. In the event of termination, the I)ISTRICF shall compensate the COUN15' for all authorized and cotm'-act No. C-6028 - l'age 4 tff 9 16B 2 63 6¸4 acccplcd work performed through the Icrminauon date. Thc DISTRICT shall be relieved o[ any and all Future obligat~m~s hereunder, including but not limited Io lost profits and consequentml damages, under lies AGREEMENT Thc DIS~i(5I' may withhold all payments to the C()IIN'I~' fi)r such work until such time m~ the DISI'RICF determines tbe exact anmunt due to the COIIN~'. If' either party tnitnnes legal action, ~nclmt~ng appeals, m enforce any provision of this A(;It, EEMENT, thc pre,.'ail~ng party shall be entitled to recover a reasonable attorney's fee, based upon thc fair market value of I}~e services provided The I)ISTI*,ICi' anticipates a total proJect cost of Nine llundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents (S925.000.00) of' which the DISTRi~ is funding Three l lundrcd Fi fly Thousand l)ollars and No Cents (S350,000.00), with the balance of matching funds in the amount of Five l lundrcd Seventy-Five Thousand Dollars and No Cents (S575,00000) to be obtained From theC()UNl%' In the event such funding becomes unavailable, that shall be grind :md sufficienl cause fi)r the i}ISTRI(71' to terminate the AGREEMENT purst~ant t(~ Paragraph 62, above. 71 A R'I'I('I,E 7 - RI,:COI.~IIS I{ETI.;NTION/OWN ERSIIII' Thc COt!NTY shall mmntain records and tile I)ISI'RI(5I' shall have inspcctmn and audit rights as follows tx,. Maintenance of RcKg.r_d_s~; The C()li,N'T'Y shall maintain all financial and non-, tinancial records and reports directly or ~nchrectly related to the negotiation or performance of' this A(;REEMENT including supporting documentation for any service rates, expenses research or reports Such records shall be maintained and made available for inspection for a period off five (5) years from completing perfi)Imance and receivtng final payn~ent under this A(;RFF/MENT B. Examination of Records: The I)IS'I'I,~IC'I' or its designated agent shall have the right to examine in accordance with generally accepted governmental auditing standards all records directly or ~ndirectly related to this AGREEMENT Such exar'n~natien nlay bc made only within five (5) years from the date of final payment under this A(;REEiMENI' and upon reasonable notice, time and place. ('. }:.xtenctcd Availab]tj_ty of Records for Legal Disputes: In 'the event that the DISTRICT should become involved itl a legal dispute wifil a third party arising from pcrformarlce under this AGREEMENT. the COUNTY shall extend the period of maintenance iCor all records relating to the .,\(;I:',EEMENT until tile final disposition of' the legal dispute, and all such records shall be made readily available to the I) ISTR ICl'. ('m~tract No C-(,tl2,~ . I'agc 5 oi'9 8.1 8.2 83 ,.\RTICLE 8 - STANI)ARI)S OF COMI'LIANCE ]'be CO[INTY. its employees, subcontractors or assigns, shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the performance of this A(;I*,EEMENT The I)lSTi.ll('TFundertakes no duty to ensure such compliance, but x,,'ill attempt to advise the (;OI~N'I'Y, upon request, as to an)' such laws of which ~t bas present knowledge The I)IS'I'I~,ICI' actively encourages the participation of M~nority-owned and Women- owned llusincss Enterprises (M/WBE) in the DISTRICF'S procurement and contracting act~vsty The COUNTY shall take reasonable steps to ensure that the M/WI?,[:. firms have the opportunity to compete for and to perform work related to this A (; R I-;I-;,M ENT 'File laws of thc Stale of' Florida shall govern all aspects of` this A(;REEMENT In the event it :s necessaD, f~r either party to ~nitiate legal action regarding this A(;REE.MENT. venue shall I)c i~ It~c Fiftccnlh Jmhc~al CIrCtllt fbr clmms under state law and ~n the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court 84 85 The COUNT',' shall allow public access to all prOJect documents and materials in accordance x,,'~tb tile provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. Should the COUNTY assert any exemptions to the requirements of Chapter 119 and related Statutes. thc' burden of' establishing such exemption, by way of' injunctive or other relief' as provided by law, shall be upor~ tile COUNTY. PLIrSU.:ti'II tO .q, ectlo{l 216..t47, Florida Statutes, tile C()UNTY is prohibited fron', the expenditure of' any funds under this AGREEiMENT to lobby the Legislature. the judicial branch, or another state agency. 9.1 A RTl C L E 9 - R E I~ATI O N S I I ! P B E'I~,V E EN Ti ! E PA RTl F~S 'l"he COUN'FY is an independent contractor and is not an employee or agent of the DISTRI(7I'. Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall be interpreted to establish any relationship other than that of an independent contractor, between the DISTRICT and the CO[INT'f. its employees, agents, subcontractors, or assigns, during or after the performance of tills ,.s,(;RI,;EMENT. The COUNTY is free to provide similar services for others. 9.2 Tim C'()I/NT3,' shall not assign, delegate, or otherwise transfer its rights and obligations as set forth in this AGREEMENT without the prior written consent of the DISTRICL Any attempted assignment in violation of this provision shall be void. ('ontract No. C-61)28 - Pa~tz 6 of 9 168 Il is the intent and understanding of` thc Parties that this AGREEMENT is solely for the bencf`ii of' Ihe C'OtlNTY and thc DISTRI(TF No person or entity other than the (;OIJNT'i' or the DISTRI(;i' shall have any rights or privileges under this A. GREEMENT in any capacity whatsoever, either a.',; third-party beneficiary or otherwise 101 10¸4 A R'I'ICI,E I{} - (;I.;N I,:P,A 1, I'i.t(}VISIONS Notwithstanding any provisions of th~s AGREEMENT to the contrary, the Parties shall not be held liable for any failure or delay in the perfl~tmance or this AGREEMENT d~at arises From fires, floods, strikes, embargoes, acts of dm public enemy, unusually severe weather, outbreak of war, restr;unl (~f Government Io ~nclude processing/receipt of all Federal, State a.d County l'erm~ts, riots, civil commotion, force majeure, act of God. or f`or any other cause of the same character which is tmavoidable through lhe exercise of'due care and beyond the control of the Pames, Failure to perform shall be excused dunng lhe conllnuance of :4uch circumsumces, bul this AGREEMENT shall ofl~erwise remain in effect. ,,\ l.:cv dement of the I)iSTRI(;I"S mission ~s cnvlrtmmental protection ,'md erlhancer'nent In ftJrtherance of' this mission: The ltlSTRICT encourages tile COUNT'Y to use recycled paper for all reports. notices and corresponde.ce, which arc prepared as part of this AGREEMENT All reports generated in connection v,'ilh this AGREEMENT should be printed on bolh sides of the paper oil which it is prepared The DISTRICT further encot, rages die COUN'I3' to p.rchase recycled paper for use in its operations if recycled paper ~ reasonably cost competitive wid'~ virgin par)er. "Reasonable cost competitive" means fl~at recycled paper is no more d'mn ten percent (10%) more expensive titan tile alternative l'he I)ISTRI(:I' encourages tile COUNTY to preserve and protect the environment and to conserve natural resources by promoting energy, water, and refuse ccm",,~rvation programs. In tile event any provisions of this AGI'~EEMENTshall conflicl, or appear to conflict. the AGREEMENT, including all exhibils, attachments and all documents specifically ~ncorpora:ed by reference, shall be interpreted as a whole to resolve any inconsistency, Failures or xv,'dvers to insist on slrict performance of an.,,' covenant, condition, or prov,s~on of' this AGREEMENT fly tile Parties, their successors and assigns shall not be deemed a waiver of' any of its rights or remedies, nor shall it relieve lhe other party from perf'orming any subsequent obligations strictly in accordance with the terms of this AGREEMENT No waiver shall be effective unless in writing and signed by the (:tmtracl Nc) C-6t)2~ . Page 7 of 9 2 105 I O6 107 [)art),' against whom enforcement is sought. Such waiver shall be limited lo provisions of this AGREEMENT specifically referred to fl~crcin and shall not be deemed a w;uver of' any other provision. No waiver shall constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing states otherwise. Should any term or provision of this A(;REEMENT be held, lo any exlent, invalid or unenforceable, as against any person, entity or circumstance during the term hereof, by force of any statute, law. or ruling of any forum of compelenl jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect any other term or provision of this AGREEMENT, to thc extent that the AGREEMENT shall remain operable, enforceable and in full force and effect to thc extent permitted by law Ttlis ,'\(;I~,EE,MENT may be amended only with the written approval of' the Parties. This AGREEMENT states tile entire understanding and agreement between the Parties and supersedes any and all written or oral representations, statements, negotiations. or agreements previously existing hetween tile Parties wilh respect to the subject matter of' this AGREEMENT. The CO[JNT¥ recognizes that any representations. statements or negotiations made l)y i)ISTRI(TF staff do not suffice to legally bind the I)ISTRI(:F in a contractual relationship unless they have been reduced to writing and signed by :m authorized l)lSTtll(TF rep~escnml~,.'e. Tills AGREEMENT shall inure to tile bencfil of and shall be binding ~,pon tile Parties. their respective assigns, and successors Ill interest. Contract No C-602~ - I';tgc 14 of 9 IN \VITNESS \VHEREOF, the l'arties t)r their duly authorized representa,ves hereby execule this A(;REEMENT on the date first vvritten above. SI"WMI) ()l'ficc of Cmmscl Atlcsl · . l)v,'l~hl ~.: t~ruc!.;. ()lctk Approved as Lo form an,I legal sul'l'ic lone', S()II'I'II I,'I,OI~,ll)A WATER MANA(;EMENT I)IS'i'RI(:I~ BY I'IS GOVERNIN(; IIOARI) I,~OA RI) ()F ('O ! iN'FY C()?,IM ISS ION ElLS ('01,I,! ER CO U NTY ,A,~s~slanl C-'olnllv ,~llorncv Contracl No ('-r, o2R . t'agc 9 of 9 EX I I 1 B IT "A" B R I I) (; E R E P I.A CEIM EN T STATEMENT OF WORK 1.0 IL.%CKGROUNI) Thc .%uuth I:lor~tla \Vater Management l)ist~tct (l)tstnct) has recently constructed a water control structt, re and other channel improvements on tile ('ocohatchce (7anal in the vicinity of Willoughby Acres. 'l'h~s project is tile second phase of the Cocohatchee Watershed Improvement Plan The first phase consisted of constructing a water control structure approximately 400 feet west of I'alm River Boulevard and associated canal dredging in the vicinity of that structure. The goals are to increase water storage in the dry season, increase water levels in the aquifer, and to maintain Flood protection An improved canal crossir~g at Palm River Boulevard and removal of the canal crossing at l,akdarld Avenue are needed to meet Ihese objectives and adequately convev the design flows ('oucurrently. Collier County (County) is ,n tile process of scheduling and desigmng upgrades and ~mprovements to the Palm P, iver l?,oulevard cross~ng artd tile .,\~rport-Pull~ng Road I:'xtension to meet the desired access and traffic circLdatlOll reqtJirements 2,0 St'OPE OF WORK The propose of this .,\grccmcnl ~s to idc~:tiQ¥, thc specific reslmns~Mlities of each party in tho impiementauon of removing the l.akeland Avenue Bridge and replacing the Palm River Boulevard Britlgc crossings of' thc ('oc(fl~alchec ('anal in Naples. Florida The scope of work is broken down ~nto spectfic tm;ks to identif}' the rcsprms~bil~ties (}J' each part)' 3.0 'O,'()I~,K lllIE..\KI)OWN STI~,IJCI'[tF, E The specific tasks to be performed by thc Parties are set forth below T~t~k I - Piper Bot, lev:,'d Extension Prior to bridge ren~oval,'replacement, roadway and bridge improvements to Piper Boulevard and Airport-Pulling Road l','xtensmn are necessary to assure two bridge crossings being available at all times for resident:i of Palm River and \Villoughby Acres. Piper Boulevard sball be extended approximately 430 feet east of the intersection with Cypress \\'it,.' East. 'File County shall be responsible for all functing, land acclu~Sit~on, design, permitting, construction, and traffic circulation in this task. T:Lsk 2 - Cocohatchee Can:d Street,re tt2 and Canal hnprovement,; The District shall design and construct a water control structure and associated canal improvemcntsintheCocohatchecCanat The structure will be located near the historic Lakeland Page I of 5, Exhibit "A", Contract C-6028 16B 2. Avenue crossing and dredging ,.viii occur between l'alm River Boulevard and the proposed structure This task does not ~nclude replacement of Lakeland Avenue and Palm River Boulevard. which are considered separate tasks. The l)istr~ct shall be responsible For funding. land acquisition, permitting, design, and construction in this task Spoil I)isposal Site This task consists of selecting a s~tc For tile disposal of sp~il obtained by tile bridge/roadway removal outlined in Tasks 6 and 7 Any excess materials shall not be deposited within the canal right-of-way, and shall not constrict the canal con,.'cyance Thc County shall be responsible for obtaining and Funding a suitable disposal site 'l':tsk 4 - Pcrmittin~ This task consists oF obtaining tile necessary regulator' permits, construction easenlents and access to complete Tasks 6 and 7, ~cmoval of thc I~keland Avenue and Palm River Boulevard roadway cross~ngs and associated canal dredging. Thc County shall be responsible for all flmding and othc~ technical aspects of this Task subject to provisions of tilts Agreement and reclutrements of Tasks (,. 7, 8 and 9 'l'a.sk 5 - Nc',,,' B~id~e i)csign '['hc ('ountv shall hay.: thc responsibility t'(~r all aspects of dcstgntng replacement structures the l.akcland ..Xvcnuc crossing arid thc Palm River lloulcvard crossing, and will provide Funchng tk~r th~stask Thc County reserves thc right to l~rego the replacement of the I,akeland ..Xvcnuv crossing and rcallocatc ('otmtv funds l{~ a replacement crossing at Livingston Road All new designs .d~all meet the hydraulic conditions required to provide the desired levels of prolcctton ..Xt Palm R~ver [~r)ulcvard, thc canal and new conveyance structure shall be able pass 1.047 cubic feet per second (cfs) with a water surface elevation not higher than 6 q feel above N(iVI) At [,akcl:md ,,Xvcnuc, thc canal and new conveyance structure shall be able t,i~ss 65(~ cfs with a water surface elevation not higher than 75 feet above NGVD 'l':tqk 6 - Existing l':flm l:,iver Boulevard B~i¢lge l?,emo,,':fl :md Dredging This task involves tile removal or thc existing Palm River Boulevarct llridge crossing of the ('ocoJl;~tcJlec (';tHai and thc ce,al dredging rccluircd t(~ obtain thc desired cross-section. Thc ('ounty shall be responsible For the bridge, bridge removal and dredging The County shall be responsible for relocating all applicable utility lines at the cost of the applicable utility that crosses the C(~cohatchee ('anal at this location incluthng, but not limited to, electric lines. telephone, cable TV. water and sewer lines, street lights, and signs The nexv canal cross-section shall have a trapezoidal shape, a typical boltom w~clth of 40 Feet, 2 I (horizontal:vertical) side slopes, a bottom elevation of-2 5 f'cct NGVI), thc ccntcrlinc shall be approximately centered with the right-of-way and/or stlbjccI to final permitting by the District New canal sections shall be dredged extending up to 100 feet upstream and 300 feet downstream of the existing Palm River Page 2 of 5. Exhibit "A", Contract C-6028 Boulevard bridge This task is contingent upon completion of Tasks I through 4 and is Io be funded by the County Should rock be encounlered and channel excavatmn reqmre blasting for rock removal, the cost of such added work shall be subJect to a mutually agreed to amendment to t}~e Agreement in l}~e event such work represenls an additional cost to Ibc County of more Ihan 510,00000. The basis for th~s amemlment shall be an ~ncreascd unit cost per cubic yard determined as scl forlh in lbo Florida I)cpartmcnl of Transportation Construction Standards USGS monitoring well ('-I00.I ~s h~calcd dose 1o the exist~nr, l'alm R~vcr Bridge and shall be preserved, if at all po:<i~l>lc, during c{mstructmn. 'l'be County shall coordinate w~th Ibc US(iS for well spec~ficati{ms, and if well replacement is required by Ibc County. the cost shall be acs(mated by thc Part~cs and subject to a mutually agreed lo amendmenl to this Agreement. 'l':t,;k 7 - Existing l-akcl:md Avenue (:ulve~l Crossing I~,emoval This task involves the removal of tile ex~sling l.akeland t\vcnue crosstng of Ibc Cocohalchee Canal and associated canal dredging This crossing consists of five 60-tnch corrugated metal pipes including a twr~-lane mad ora lop The Dismct w~ll be responsible for construction activities (dredging and excavation) and funding of this task 'l'be District, at their own d~screl~on, nlav have [IJg Cypress Basra field crews conduct the work This task is contingent upon thc complotior~ of Tasks I thr(mgh -I Thc ('ounly or approprtate utility shall be responsible flor relocating all utility linch; croqsing thc Cocohatchee Canal at this location prior to culvert removal and cxcavatmn [31~l~t~cs to relocate include, but are not I~mited to, telephone, cable TV. electric, water, sewer, street ltght~, arid signs. Tile design cross-soclmn of Ihe canal at the ex~sting Lakeland Avenue cross~ng localmn after structure removal shall have an approximate trapezoidal shape wilh a bottom width of 40 feet. 2:1 (horizontal'vertical) side slopes, a bottom elcvalmn of 0.0 fleet above NGVD. and the centerline shall be approximalely 50 feet from either r~ght-otLway and/or subject lo Gnal permitting by the D~slr~cl The new section shall be dredged up lo t00 foci upstream and I00 l'ecl downstream of lhe ex,sling Lakeland Avenue crossing location Af~crbridge removal, thc l)istrict shall not bcrcsponsiblc fi)r any transportation routes. traffic access, rcroul~ng traffic or traffic circulation The ('ountv shall be responsible for all access and clrcHiatlo~l Task 8 - L.akclm~d Averme il,idge ('unslmclion This task consists of all work access:,%, Io construct a new roadway c~ossing for tim Cocohalchee Canal to replace the existing Lakeland ..V,.enue culvert crossing. The County shall be responsible for all design, per,rotting, land acqmsition, construction activities, and other technical ~pects of this task The Distr~ct w~ll roirnbt, rse the County for lh¢ cost of a comparable crossing or 5;I 25.00000. v. hicbever is less A comparable crossing is defined as a two-lane roadway crossing without lurr'~ lanes and without pedestrian/bicycle filcilities that allows for 656 cfs flow at a water surface elevation riot higher than 7 5 feet above NGVD Thc ('ounty. at ils discretion,may build a comparable two-lane roadv, av crossing or upgrade tile crossing It'} add additional traffic lanes. turn lay]es, and pedestrian/bicycle lanes, and build thc new crossIng at the existing Lakeland Avenue location or at the proposed Livingston Road location Any new canal crossing/structure shall meet the hydraulic requirements described in Task 5 The District will pay fifty percent ['age 3 of 5, Exhibit "A", Contract C-6028 168 2 (50%) after the existing crossing and struclurc are removed and ,,rill pay the remaining fifty percent (50%) after the new structure is complete at eilher thc extsting location or at the Livingston Road location. The County shall conduct an inspecnon of the site after Task 7 is complete to determine that removal off the structure is complete Thc Courtly shall provide documents [~r confirmation of construction cost and construction completion off this crossing lo the District to verify the amount due to the (~ounly. The County shall have all responsibility for access and tral'fic circulation related to culvert removal or new construction li~.~k 9 - P;dm River Boulevard Bfid?.,e Construction 'I'bis task involves all tile v.'ork necessary to construct a new roadway crossing on Ibc Cocohatchee Canal to replace the existing Palm River Boulevard Bridge crossing. Tile County shall be responsible for all design, permitting, land acquisition, bidding, construction activities, and other technical aspects of this task and shall decide on specifications of final bridge design and construction with the final structure exceeding or equaling the specifications and capacity of the ex~sting bridge structure The nexv crossing/structure shall satisfy the hydraulic requirements described in Task 5. The District ,,viii reimburse tile County for tile cost of a comparable crossing or S225.000, whichever is less. A con'~parable crossing is a two-lane roadway crossing. without turn lanes and without pedestrian/bicycle fi~cilities, that allows for 1047 cfs flow at a water surface elevation not higher than 6.5 feet NG'v'D. Tile County shall conduct an inspection of the site after Task 6 ts complete to determine that removal of the structure is complete. The County sllall provide a copy of the lowest responsive and responsible bid for contract award and construction of this crossing to the District as part of tile strpporting docurrlentalion for tile ~nvo~cetotlle District The D~stnc!shall pay fifty percent (50%) after tlle existing crossing and structure ;ire removed and the remaining rift), (50%) Ikfllowing completion including bridge removal, canal excavation, and bridge construction The County shall have all responsibility For access and traffic circulation The District shall not be responsible for any traffic concerns related to bridge removal or ne,.,.' construction 'Ltsk I0 - Additional Excavation In tile event the District desires tile County to excavate upstream or do:vnstream of the Palm River Boulevard Bridge beyond the limits defined herein, the County shall undertake to perform such work upon acceptance and approval by the District of proper bids for such work and the execution of an an~endment to lhe Agreement by the Parties. Any additional work performed tinder such amendment shall be reimbursed bb' tile D~strict under the terms of Article 4, Invoicing and Payment, of the ,,\greement 4.0 Project Accei~t:mce For lklsks 6.8 and 9 the County's ProJect Manager shall verify in writing that the work For which tile invoice is rendered bas been completed The County's Bridge Design Engineer shall provide final certification that the work as described and outlined in this Statenlent of Work has been Page 4 of 5. Exhibit 'A", Contracl C-6028 168 2 completed in accordance with tile County's contract documents and all claims relative to these projects arc satisfied. Tile County shall provide whatever supporting documentation may be deemed necessary for the District to verify satisfactory completion, and to support the Jump sum payment amounts specified uelow in Paragraph 5. 5.0 T;k~K~;, Due l)ates and Payments 'l'~t,~ k I)escriptlon Due Date' Payment I Piper Boulevard Extension 3 months 2 Cocohatchee Canal Structure ti2 and Canal 3 months Improvcmcnts 3 Spoil Disposal Site 36 months 4 Permitting 36 months 5 New Bridge Design 36 months 6 Palm River Boulevard Bridge Removal and 36 months S112.500 Dredging 7 Lakeland Avenue Culvert Crossing Removal 3 months 8 Lakeland Avenue Bridge Construction 3 months $125.000 9 Palm River Boulevard Bridge Construction 36 months $112,500 10 Additional Excavation up lo 36 months Total $350.000 Note ' The due date is expressed in months following the execution of this Agreement. Note -' The Dollar amounts indicated arc "Lump Sum" amounts. Page 5 of 5, Exhibit "A". Contract C-6028 Project: 60061 (Livingston Rd.) Parcel: 149 (Holmes/Gomes) 16B /,' PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS PURCHASE AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") is made and entered into this.,.~/L,~ day of _.~~, 19..~. by and between MARY JANE GOMES, DR. ROBERT A. HOLMES AND GWENDOLYN HOLMES (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Owner") and COLLIER COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred Io as the "Purchaser"). WHEREAS, the Purchaser requires certain lands described as: All of Tract 6, Unit 29, Golden Gate Estates, as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 7, Page 57, Public Records of Collier County, Florida. (hereinafter referred to as the "Properly") for public purposes; WHEREAS, the Owner desires to convey the Property to the Purchaser for the stated purposes, under the terms and condilions set fodh herein; and WHEREAS, the Purchaser has agreed to compensate the Owner for conveyance of the Property to the Purchaser. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of these premises, the sum of Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby mutually acknowledged, it is agreed by and between the parties as follows: 1. Owner shall convey the Property to Purchaser, via Warranty Deed, in exchange for the sum of $130,000.00 (One Hundred Thirty Thousand Dollars) as full payment for the Property interest taken and for all other damages, claims, demands, or causes of action in connection with said Property. 2. Purchaser shall pay Owner of the Property by County Warrant. 3. Both O~vner and Purchaser agree that time is of the essence in regard to the closing and that, therefore, said closing shall occur within 90 (ninety) days of the execution of this Agreement by Purchaser. At closing, Purchaser shall deliver the County Warrant to Owner and Owner shall deliver a deed to Purchaser in a form acceptable to Purchaser. Owner shall remove, within 45 (forty-five) days after closing, any and all properly, goods and chattels which are located on the Property. Purchaser ,.;hall provide a list of items to be removed, if any, at closing. Owner shall indemnify and hold Purchaser harmless from any costs in connection with the relocation of the identified items. 4. Owner shall pay its pro-rata share of taxes, assessments, or other term expenses of the Property through the day before closing. 5. Owner shall convey a marketable title free of any liens, encumbrances, exceptions, or qualifications. Marketable title shall be determined according to applicable title standards adopted by the Florida bar and in accordance with law. The Owner will, if title is found unmarketable, use diligent effort to correct defect(s) in the title within the time provided therefor including the bringing of necessary suits. Any and all documents to clear title to the Property shall be provided to Purchaser on or before the date of closing. Purchase Agreement Page 2 6. Owner represents that the properly and all uses of the property have been and presently are in compliance with all Federal, State, and Local environmental laws; that no hazardous substances have been generated, stored, treated or transferred on the property except as specifically disclosed to the County or permi~ed under environmental laws; that the Owner has no knowledge of any spill or environmental law violation on any properly contiguous to or in the vicinity of the property to be sold to the County; that the Owner has not received notice and otherwise has no knowledge of a) any spill on the property, b) any existing or threatened environmental lien against the property, or c) any lawsuit, proceeding or investigation regarding the generation, storage, treatment or transfer of hazardous substances on the property. This provision shall survive closing and is not deemed satisfied by conveyance of title. 7. Owner hereby agrees that it shall indemnify, defend, save and hold harmless the County against and from, and to reimburse the County with respect to, any and all damages, claims, liabilities, laws, costs, and expenses (including without limitation, reasonable paralegal and attorney fees and expenses whether in coud, out of coud, in bankruptcy or administrative proceedings or on appeal), penalties or fines incurred by or acceded against the County by reason or arising out of the breach of Owner's representation under Section 6. This provision shall survive closing and is not deemed satisfied by conveyance of title. 8. Conveyance of the Property, or any interest in the Property, by the Owner is contingent upon no other provisions, conditions, or premises other than those so stated above and this wdtten agreement, including all exhibits attached hereto, shall constitute the entire agreement and understanding of the parties and there are no other prior or contemporaneous written or oral agreements, undertakings, promises, warranties, or covenants not contained herein. 9. Owner is aware and understands that the "offer" to purchase represented by this Agreement is subject to acceptance and approval by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida. 10. The Purchaser shall pay for all costs of recording the deed. All other costs associated with this transaction including but not limited to transfer, documentar7 and intangible taxes, and recording costs for any curative instruments shall be borne and paid by Owner. 11. This Agreement is governed and construed in accordance with the laws of the State Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF:, the parties hereto have executed this Purchase Agreement on the day and year first above written. Dated ProjectYAcquisition Approved by 3CC: Ord. 96-457, 10/8196 (8.B.3) AS TO PURCHASER: Date.d:" :~/~/~'.'!:~,~., ATTEST: Dwight E. Brock, Clerk Deput~'.C.!e~., ,] :,,.,, ,,., :. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Purchase Agreement Page 3 16B AS TO OWNER: Witness (Print Name) '~tness kJ (Print Name) (Pdnt Name) wi~q~s~ ' ~, '-~'-- (Print ~Witaeis ~/~ (P~t Name) Wi[~es~ (Print Na~e) Dr. Robed A. Holmes Gwendolyn Holm~ MEMORANDUM Date: To: From: Re: February 5, 1998 Pete Schalt, Project Manager Office of Capital Projects Management Ellie Hoffman, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Work Order ~HMA-FT96-7, Agreement for Fixed Term Professional Engineering Services Dated September 26, 1995 (Contract ~95-2422) Enclosed please find two original documents as referenced above, Agenda Item #16B6, approved by the Board of County Commissioners on February 3, 1998. If you should have any questions, please contact me at: (8406). Thank you. Enclosures WORK ORDER ff IIMA.FT96-7 Agreement t.r Fiscal Term l'rotes~i.n~l Engineering Serslces Daled September 26, 1995 {C.nlracl ~95-2422) AMENDMENT This Work t)rdcr is for profcssinnnl engineering services for work known as: The work is specified in Ibc proposal dalcd Drccmher 5 1997, ~hich is attached herclo and made a part of this amended Work ()rdcr In accordance with the 'l'crm~ and CondHions of l}le Agreement referenced above. W.rk ()rdcr ~IIMA-V'l'96-7 is a:llcrldcd per Il.lc M.nlrs & A~.rhth'~ lac. December 5 ~o Sec attached lellcr dated December 5, 1997. ~ Complete ~ork wilhin 1~ months frnm reccipl of thc Nolicc Io Proceed authori/in8 Marl of ~ In nccordance with schedule below: ()rit~in;d W,rk Amendment New Work ~ g,(J(}O {}{} 19,500 (}0 1,5()0.00 2,500 O0 4 ,()()fL(lO (,.(}00 O0 15,500 O0 21,50(}00 3,000 O0 5,200.00 g,2OO O0 12,00000 3,000 O0 15,000.O0 6.000 O0 4,000.(lO IO.O00.00 ~0000 O0 ~OO00 $ 4 (I,0(}0.00 ~49.700 O0 Task: #I l)csi8n & Appr.val ~2 Biddln8 Ass~slancc #4 Start-Up Assistance #5 ()pcrntional Monitorln~ [:inal Report Total Time & Malcrinl~ Nol To l~xcccd An.',' change ,.~,ithin Irmnctar.', author:p, of ti'ds W,ark ()rdcr mad.: subs¢'.luent lc, final departlncn! approval '.~.ill hc considered an additional scr,.icc and charged accc, rdintz to Schedule "A" c,f thc Agrcemcnl. Peter $chalt. PMP. OCPM Pro.iuct Matlatlcr Date .. / , REVII:.WF~I) BY: '" ' . =/- /' " ' "' '" Adoll'o A (;onzalcz, P J'~ . ()CPM IMrcch,r I)ntc A T'F F. S T: Dwight E. Brock. c'Icrk Approved as Io Form and [.e~al Sufficiency: ~ssist~unty Att * nc. A I'TI'~ S'l': (Corporate Secrctur.', ) 1ty: Type Name and Title (or)~vimes s e s(i) ~/)~ ~ ~J"~(2) ~,. B()ARD ()1" C{)UNTY C()MMISSI()NI,~RS Collier [..'ounls'. }:lor~da Lh~Ie ~c~& A~i.tcx=lnc 7, , / - ,"/,'/ %ittn;iturc Prinl N ;HII C Signature IIM;\ LI I. Wol,'FI, ES OOZ 6 Preseo,,mg and enhancing Florida's quality of life since 1966 HOLE. MONTES & ASSOCIATES. INC. ENGINEERS PLANNERS SURVEYORS July 21, I997 (Revised December 5, 1997) Mr. Pete Schah Collier County OCPM 3301 E. Tam}ami Trail Naples. FI 34112 RE: Manatee Road ASR \Vcll- Additional Scrwices Amcndmcr~t ,,-;I [o V,'urk Order ;-[M.,',.-FT?6-7 t IMA File No. 96.98 RE'CF__IVED DEC 1 5 1997 OJ'l"l t,r.. ,o ~ ..,n,', Dear Pete: }-tole. Montes & Associates. Inc. ,,,.'as selected in December 1996 It) provide engineering and h.vdrogeological scrvice:~ for the conversion of an existing .,\SR test well into an operable svstcm fi~r storage and recovery of potable v,'atcr. The project scope consisted of design of piping between thc existing ASR well. a new pump. and tile County's distribution svstcm to allow both injection and recovery of stored potable water at an original Work Order amount of 540.000. Disinfection was to be provided using an existing gas chlorin.'~tion system. Preliminarb.' phms were prepared per the original scope of the project and delivered to (.'oilier County in March 1997. }:ollowing review of thc plans by thc County's \Vater Department. it was decided that: 1. .,\ n,.'w liquid chlorine (bleach) disinfection system should be used for improved safelv, 2. ,,\ n.:xv cartridge filtration system should be added to filter thc water being recovered from tile v.'¢tl for improvo, t water quality, and 3. A new instrumentation and control system shouM be provided to recruiter the proposed svstcms ~hich ~iii be ad,icj lc, thc pro. ict. t. Pursuant to your request. }tole. Montes & ..\ssociatcs. Inc. is pleased to submit this proposal to perlbrm professional engineering consulting tasks for Ibc design, pcrmilting. and construction :,upcrvision of additional facilities to bc added to tiffs project. 'Ibc proposed services arc for additional facilities, xthich have been requested by thc Water l)ivision, to bc added to thc scope of thc original project following review of tile plans prepared for that project. In particular, this involves addition of a new filtration system. new disinfection system, and nc',',' instrumentation arm control systems. Mike Newman requested that a cartridge filtration system be provided for liltration of recovered water prior to placement into the potable water storage tank. This cartridge Pete Schah Collier County OCPM RE: Manatee Road ,,\SR \Veil - Additional Services }[M,,\ File No. 90.98 Jul.',' 21. 1997 (Revised December 5 1997) Pa~c 2 ~ filtration system will require a larger pump than was originally spccilicd. ('l~lorinalion would b¢ t~wough addition of sodium hyprochloritc (bleach) which would be ddivcrcd to the site. The pmposcd disintbction system equipment would ncedlobehouscd inanew appropriately protected area. although thc chlorine analyzers and other instrumentation could be housed in thc old chlorine room. Thc new chlorine storage area will be open air with roof. Thc disinfection sx'stcm will include an ammqnia l~'cd sx'stcm 1o allmv production of chloramincs. Instrumentation systems will include specific conductance of recovered water, linc pressure, linc rio,.,., totalized flow. main tank level, and valve position of various motor operated control valves. Controls include pump starL%top and opcn,'close of motorized valves. :\utomatic sequencers v, ill be provided in the control Iogic to sequence thc ANR svstcm from "standby to recovery" and from "standby to injection" modes of operation and back...\larrn svstcmswiII beset up to enunciate an abnormal condition both locally and remotely at the master telemetry site. Thc existing pump station's remote telemetry unit (RTL') will be modific,t For thc ncxv digital and analog signals...X local control panel with operator oxcrridc controls will be proxidcd. Thc existing master tclcmctr> unit at thc %)uth Rc=zional Water Treatment Plant will bc modified Ibr thc now digital a~ld analog sicnals including a new graphic screen Ibr thc proposed xxcll control. Thc master tclcmctr> unit at thc North Regional Water Treatment Plant will be modified operation and monitoring of ;he Nlanatcc Road l~cilit>' through a change order to thc Redundant 'I'elcmc~ry project. ..Xdditional controls \till be proxidcd fi~r thc proposed chlorine IUcd sxs~cm xxith ;q~plicablc analyzers, metering pumps, and lbcd lbrx~ard control:;. Nlonitoring ~ill be provided I~rchlorine residual, chlorine s~oragctank to\el. ammonia lilllk xtci=~ht, ammonia ejector x act!ti{il alarm, crc. \Vt propose to perl'orm professional services for those [XVO { ~ c~ [} I additional added items and appurlcnances under our continuing agreement on a time and materials cost basis to exceed a tot.d o{'549.700. New engineering design is required lo implement this Department-requested work. Invoices will bc submiucd monthl} based on actual expense of the work completed on cnch task to dale. Thc auachcd spreadsheet oullincs our estimate of the IUcs required lo pcrlk~rm these services. '['hose additional tasks ,,,.'ill bo performed in coordination xvith ~hosc tasks contained in our previous authorization associated with this project. Wc anticipate including thc plans illin spccilScations prepared under this a~rccmcnt with those prepared under thc original agreement to be bid as a single construction contract. Pete Schah Collier County OCP,X[ RE: Manatee Road ASR \Veil - Additional Services HMA File No. 96.98 July 21. 1997 (Revised December 5 1997) Page 3 6 Please give mc a call to discuss this proposal fi~llowing your review. \Ye look fi, rward lo assisting you on this project. We can begin work on these additional tasks immediately following notice to proceed. Very truly yours. !IO[. I~. 5,!ON'lES & ,,XSSOCI.,~TES. I5:C. Ronald E. [3cnson. Jr.. Ph.D.. P.E. Vice President. Director of Environmental Engineering REB/nsl W:\I996'9609g C01 RE[I PS;199712081.IR DOC Task Description 1 Design and approval 2 Bid package 3 Construction supervision 4 Start-up 5 Operational monitoring 6 Final reportYRec DwglO&M 7 Administration total Sheet1 Missimer Phasell TLC HMA Total $3,000 $10,000 $6,500 $19,500 S300 $1,200 Sl.000 $2.500 Sl,500 $9,000 $5.000 $15.500 $1,200 $2,500 $1,500 $5,200 SO Sl,500 $1,500 S3.000 SO $2,000 S2,000 S4,000 SO SO SO SO S6,000 S26,200 S17,500 5.49,700 168 6 Page 1 R.R. BOWKER - A division of Reed Elsevier inc. ORDER FORM AND SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") 16C 2 Subscriber: Collier C o u nty.__P Hb I! c. Li__b_r_a ry Institution Marilyn Matthes Contact Phone: 941-261-8208 Subscriber's "Premises" from which Database may be accessed shall mcluCe the fotlowmg site(s): See Appendix A 650 Central Avenue ~treet _hi a,D I_es_ FL 33940-6087 City State Z~p Fax 941-649.1293 Initiai Term shall mean: Start date: ...__.October 5,~7' End date: gctober 4, 1998 Fee shall mean: $3,850.00 to Maximum # of simultaneous Authorized Users shall mean no more than: []5 ~_~10 [~15 ~_~j 20 ~J25 L) 30 ~¢,,.1 ,l"l'~ ~ r'. ~ Unlimited S~stem Provider shall mean' Other Database shall mean: [] Books In Print® and/or [] Publishers. Wholesalers & Distributors and/or [] Books Out of Print [] Other: L_S_,y_]stem shall mean: VISTA [~] DRANet[~_j CARL Other The Subscriber hereby declares that it has read and understood the terms and conditions of this Subscription Agreement and that it will be bound by them. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ACCEPTED BY: R.R. BOWKER ("RRB") A division of Reed Elsevier Inc. By: ,, , ,' Title: Neal Golf Senior Vice President, Chief Operating Officer Date: OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Barbara~ Berry,' chaNirma~ Date: ATTEST: Dwight E. Brock, Clerk kP~roOi~d a~ to form and legal sufficiency: Assistant County Attorney ORDER FORM AND SUBSCRIPTION AGREEMENT ("Agreement") R.R. BOWKER and COLLIER COUNTY PUBLIC LIBRARY APPENDIX A Additional Librar3, Sites Main Branches Collier County Public Library 650 Central Avenue Naples, FL 33940-6087 Collier North, 788 Vanderbilt Beach Rd., 34108 E. Naples Branch, 8787 E Tamiami Trial, 34113 Estates, 1266 Golden Gate Blvd., 34120 Golden Gate, 4898 Coronado Pkwy, 34116 Immokalee Branch, 417 N. First St., Immokalee, 34142 Marco Island Branch, 210 S Heathwood Dr, Macro Island, 34145 Everglades Branch, City Hall, Everglades City, 33929 1, USER LICENSE. RRB hereby grants to Subscriber and its patrons and staff ("Authorized Users'), a non.exclusive, non- transferable right and license for the term of this Agreement to use the Database via the System, solely through Subscriber's hbrary network computer system, either while phys~calht at the Premises or remote from the Premises wa telecommun~cat,ons or Internal linkage; and no other, and not for sale er hcense to third parties. Subscriber shall limit access so that no more than the Maximum number of Authorized Users may su~:Jtaneously access the Database; and shall hmit remote access to the Database so that only Authorized Users who have a vahd hbrary- issued security account may search the Databases wh,ie remote from the Premises. 2. RESTRICTIONS. Author,zed Users shall use the Database solely in connecbon w,th the terms of this Agreement. Authorized Users shall not (i) copy, download, or omerwise reproduce the Database m any medium or in any way, m whole or ~n part, except that Authorized Users may prmt or download limited portions of the Database which are the results O! d~screte searches for their personal research purposes, only.; Iii) alter, modify, or adapt the Database, including but not limited to decompiling, disassembling, or creahng derivative works, without the prior written approval of RRB, or (iii) sell, license or otherwise distribute, in any way whatsoever, to third parties, including to Subscriber's subsidiaries or affihates, the Database or any part or parts thereof. 3. DISTRIBUTION. RRB represents that it has a distribution license with the System Provider permitting the distribution of the Database by means of the System. 4. UPDATING. 'Updates' shall mean any revisions of. additions to, or deletions from the Database. RRB agrees to gwe notice to the System Prowder within five (5) days of the execution of this Agreement that Subscriber ~s permitted to receive the Database and Updates through the System. RRB shall provide System Provider with monthly Updates which snail be d,str,buted to Subscr,0er through the System. All references ~n th~s Agreement to the Databases shall ,nclude all Updates thereto. 5. TERM. The initial term of this Agreement shall be for the period specified on the first page of this Agreement Ithe "Initial Term"). This Agreement shall automabcally renew thereafter for successive one ll) year terms at [he fees current as of the renewal date unless either g~ves to the other written notice of ~tS intention tO cancel or modify the Agreement at least nmety (90) days in advance of the expiration of ;he then Current term. 6. PAYMENT. Subscriber agrees to make payment of the Fee specd~ed on the first page of this Agreement to RRB no later than thirty {30) days following delivery to Subscriber of RRB'S mvmce. RRB reservus the right to suspend d,str~bution o! Updates to the Subscriber il paymcn, in full ~s not recmved from Subscriber within lorry-five (45J days following delivery of RRB's inmal mvoice to Subset*bar. 7. TERMINATION. In addition to termmat~on rights provided elsewhere herein. RRB may terminate this Agreement by g~ving written notice to Subscriber in the event that: (ii Subscriber commits a material breach of this Agreement and fails to cure such breach within thirty (30) days after ~ts race,pt of written notification thereof; notwithstanding the foregomg. RRB reserves the right tO suspend Subscriber's access to the Databases during such thirty day pengO, untd such breach is cured; (ii) Subscr,ber hies a petition in bankruptcy either voluntarily or involuntarily, iS adjudicated, insolvent by ~any court, or if a trustee or a receiver o! a substantial portion of any property of the Subset,bar shall be appointed in a~y suit or procaedmg by or agmnst such party, or (iii) Subscriber shall make an assignment fOr the benefit of creditors or sh~ll seek or obtain the benef,t of any b,'~r~kruptcy Or insolvency act. Further, RRB shall have :he r,ght tO :ermmate this Agreement upon s~xty (60) days' pr,or wr,tten not,ce to Subscriber ,I RRB d~sconbnues commeroat production of the Database. Notwithstanding that th,s Agreement may be termmated for any gl the above stated reasons, or by exp,rat~on gl the term granted herein. Subscriber shall not be reheved Irom ~ts obi,gat,on to pay to RRI~: any and ail lees or other amounts due under this Agreement atany brae, or tor any period through the dale OI such termination~ nor shall termination or e×p~rat~on ailect any rights Or remedies any party may have resulpng from any breach al this Agreement by the other party prior Io such termination. 8. POST TERMINATION PROVISIONS. Upon tei'mmatiOno unless olherwise agreed ,n wr,t,ng by RRB, within {10) business days Subscriber wdl destroy any and all machine-readable or human-readable material delivered to Subscriber pursubnt to this Agreement and then ,n Subscriber's possession ior under Subscr,ber's control; and expunge from any electronic storage famlhy owned by or .under the control of Subscribe¢I any data contained in or derived from the Database; and certify to RRB in wnting that Subscriber has complied with the requirements this Section. 9. WARRANTIES AND LIABILITY. RRB represents and warrants thal it has the full right, power~ and authority to enter ,nra this Agreement and grant all rights and interests as contemplated hereunder; and that /he Database, and ,rs use ,n accordance with the terms ~erein. does not and will not ,nfringe upon, violate or misappropriate any U.S. patent, cop'¢r~ght, trade secret, trademark. !or any other proor,etary r~ght, contract or other right or inta~rest of any tmrd p~rty. EXCEPT AS EXPRESSLY PROVIDED HEREIN. SUBSCRIBER AND RRB MAKE NO, AND NEITHER RECEIVES AN~' OTHER WARRANTY. EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, AND THERE ARE EXPRESSLY EXCLUDED ALL WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. RRB MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR REPRESENTATIOi~ REGARDING THEACCURACY, ADEOUACYo OR COMPLETENESS OF THE INFORMATION CO~TAINED V/ITHli'J THE DATABASE. EXCEPT WITH RESPECT TO THE COMPUTATION OF DAMAGES FOR THE UNAUTHORIZED USE, DISCLOSURE, MISAPPROPRIATION OR INFRINGEMENT OF INTANGIBLE PROPERTY SUBJECT TO COPYRIGHT. PATENT RIGHT. TRADE SECRET OR OTHER PROPRIETARY RIGHTS, NEITHER PARTY SHALL BE LIABLE TO THE OTHER FOR INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES. REGARDLESS OF WHETHER SUCH DAMAGES ARE FORESEEABLE OR WHETHER SUCH DAMAGES ARE DEEMED TO RESULT FROM THE FAILURE OR INADEOUACY OF ANY EXCLUSIVE OR OTHER REMEDY. IN THE EVENT THAT ANY PART OF THIS SECTION g SHALL BE HELD UNENFORCEABLE OR INVALID UNDER THE LAWS OF AN APPLICABLE JURISDICTION. THE REMAINING PARTS THEREOF SHALL NEVERTHELESS CONTINUE TO BE VALID AND ENFORCEABLE AS THOUGH THE OFFENDING PORTIONS HAD NOT BEEN A PART HEREOF. iN ADDITION, IF THE LIMITATIONS ON WARRANTY OR LIABILITY THEREUNDER ARE HELO TO BE UNENFORCEABLE UNDER THE LAW OF AN APPLICABLE JURtSOICTION. SUCH LIMITATIOF,~S SHALL. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION 9, BE ADJUSTED SUCH THAT THE LIABILITY OF RRB SHALL NOT EXCEED THE A~',IOUi'JT OF THE FEE DESCRIBED ON THE FIRST PAGE OF THIS AGREEMENT, PAID BY SUBSCRIBER TO RRB. 10. PROPRIETARY RIGHTS. Subscnber acknowledges that Database are the product of RRB's extensive gathenng and coordination of in/ormat~on, selection therefrom of information considered by RRB to be relevant and useful, and original arrangement of selected information. Subscnber acknowledges that RRB owns ali right, title and mterest, mclud,ng, without limitation, the copyright, in and to the Database and all components thereof. The COpyright and title to all property mterests in or to the Database are and shall rema,n ,n RRB as owner and this Agreement shall not grant to Subscriber any right of ownership therein. Subscriber shall not alter, remove, obscure or obstruct the display of any copyright, trademark or other proprietary notice placed upon the Database by RRB. 11, INDEMNIFICATION. Each party shall defend andindemmfy the other, its directors, officers, agents, and employees from an-,, liability and expense (including. w~thout limitation. re.~sonab~e attorney's feesl ~mposed upon the mdemn,fied party as a result of any claim arising out ot the acts or om,ssions of, or breach of any representation or warranty hereunder by the indemnitor under this Agreement and including all costs. exoenses and damages incurred or suffered h./ ~he mdemn,f,ed party in connection therewith, subject, however, to the limited liability provision of Section 9 hereof; provided that the party seeking indemnification shall promptly notify the other Of any such claim, and permit such other party to control the defense or resolution thereof, and the party seeku~g indemnification shall fully cooperate with the other m c0nnechon therewith. 12. RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES. The parties recognize that they are independent contractors and neither is an agent. employee, partner, or jo,at venturer of the other. 13. ENTIRE UNDERSTANDING. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between '.he parties and supersedes any and all prior and contemporaneous understandings, written or oral, concerning the subject matter of this Agreement. This Agreement is intended to supersede the terms and conditions of any I~urchase order, confirrhatron, invoice or other commercial document relating to the subject matter hereof subsequently issued by either party to th'; other, l-~,ny amendment or modification of this Agreement must be approved ~n writhe by a duly authonzed representative of each party. 14. NO WAIVER. i',~o waiver by either party of any term or condition ot this Agreement, whether by conduct or other,,v~se. in any one or more mstonces, shall be deemed a lurther or continuing waiver of any such term or condttion, or a waiver of any other term or condition of this Agreement. 15. SEVERABILITY. If any provision of this Agreement is found to be invalid by any court, arbitrator, or arbitration panel having competent jurisdiction, the invalidity of such prov,sion shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions hereof. 16C 16. SURVIVAL. Notwithstanding termination or expiration of this Agreement, the terms 0f Sections 2. 7, 8, 9, 10 and,;11 shall survive termmation or exp,rat,on and remain in full f~rce and ellect. 1 7. NOTICE. All notices shall be addressed to such party at the address or apphcable facs,m,le nIJmber set forth on /he first page of th,s Arjreement, Or such other address as may hereaiter ~)e des,on,3~ed ~n '.,~r,t,ng by the addressee tO the addressor, and snail be deemed suffic,ent ,~ sent by Un,ted States Registered Ma,I. 0os~age prepa,d return ~ece,o~ requested, or by facsimile transm,ss,on w~t~ confirmed answerback [o the addresses as set forth on the first oage of th~s A~reement and shall be effec~ve uoom receipt ~ 18. APPROVALS. Each party reoresents that all necess, ary approvals and consents have been obta,ned for entry into ,this Agreement. 19, GOVER~NING LAW. This Agreement shall be governedl,by, and construed in accordance with, the laws of the State gl New Jersey, without reference to principles Of choice of Jaws. Ex~ept as hereinafter provided, any controversy or claim arising DUi of or relating to this Agreement, or breach thereof, shafl'!be resolved by arbitration in accordance with the Commercial Arbdration Rules, then in effect, of the American Arbitration Association and judgment upon the award may be entere~ in any court having jurisdiction thereof. Any arbitration shall~be held within the City of Newark, New Jersey, unless the parties agree otherwise in writing. Notwithstanding the f~re~0|ng, each party shall be at liberty to apply to any court having jurisdiction for injunctive, interim or conservatory rehef from any threatened or continu,ng breach by the other party gl its obligations uqder this Agreement. 20. ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement is binding u~on and Shall inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective ~oermitted successors, trustees, and assigns. Neither party shall have the nght to assign this Agreement without the prior written consent of the other, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld or delayed. Notwithstanding the foregoing, RRB shall have the r,ght to assign ~ts rights under this Agreement, in whole or in part. to any entity controlling, controlled by, or under common control with Reed Elsev,er P.L.C. or fo any entity which shall succeed to all or substantially all gl the assets, liabilities, and goodw,II of RRB, provided that such successor entity shall assume all the duties and obligations of RRB under ,this Agreement. 21. FORCE MAJEURE. Adelaymor failureof performanc~of e~ther party shall not coast,tufa a default hereunder nor bas~s for, nor give rise to, any claim for damages, if and to the extent such delay or.ladure is caused by force majeure, and the penod lot performance shall be extended accordin~lly. Notwithstanding the foregoing, should any extension of[;,the period of performance exceed one hundred eighty (180! days, e,ther party may termmate this Agreement by giving notice to the other, and such terminabon shall not constitute a breach gl this Agreement. 5312-1 Wor.bJ Order No. 5825-7-547 Sec. 27, Twp ::U~S. Rge ~ E Parcel I.D. ff (Maintained Appraiser) 00166840007 by Count)' Form 3722 (Stocked) Re','. 7/94 EASEMENI' This Instrument Prepared By Name: ~ Co. Name: ~ Address: 4.105 SW 15 AV 2277617 OR: 2386 PG: 3~89 ~C ~I! 't.75 Thc undersigned, in considcralion of thc payment of SI.(X) anti other good a~ir valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of 'h~ch ~s hcrcbv acknowledged, grant and give to Florida Power & Light Compan).', its licensee(. agents, successors, and assigns, an casement forever for the construction. operation and maintenance of overhead and underground electric uliliw facililics (including wires, poles, guys. cables, conduils and appurtenant equilmientl m he installed from time m time: wi~h thc richt to reconstrucl, improve, add to. enlarge, change thc voltage, as well as. th~' size of and remove such facilities or any of them within an easement 12/ feet in width described ;ts folkwcs: See legal description described on Exhibit "A", attached hereto and made a part hereof. , ...... ~,,~.. ..... c. .... See additioc~al recmiroT~r]ts described on Exhibit "~", attached hereto arid made a part hereof. Together with lhe right to permit an),' other person, firm or corporation to allach wires lc) any facilities hereunder and lay ca6Ole and conduit within thc easement and m operate the same for communications purposes the ri.hr of ngrcss and c~ress to said premises at al! times: the right to clear the land and keep it cleared of all trees, undergrowth and other obstructions w thru the easement area; m mm and cut and keep trimmed and cut all dead, weak, leaning or dam, crous Irccs or limbs outside of thc easement area which'might interfere wJlh or fall upon the lines or syslei'ns of communications or po&'cr transmission or distribution; and further grants. ID the'fullest extent the undersigned has the power to grant, il' at all. thc rights hercinabove granted on thc land heretofore described, over.,along. under and across the roads, streets or highways adjoining or through said property. ~ ~i ~2'~i IN WITNESS WtIEREOF. the undersigned has signed and sealed this instrument on 7~_d. p2~ .~ '5 , 19_x..,a.4[ [~ard of County Commissioners Signed, sca[cd and delivered of Collier County, Floric~ ,~ in the presence of: IWimess' Signature} Print Name ~'bOe45"t'/~ L. ~lGWT'utO fWilncss) (Wimess' Signature) Print Name ._~/_~L./~A°l C ~ /G j%.' I WitnessJ .j-,.,;,:. . '..j . :. . .. . Naples, F% 34112 Prim Narne: Dwight E. Brock, Clerk Print Address: 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, YL 34112 (C'orporalc Seal) STATE OF ~/nr,~ ..... &ND COUNIY OF ~C ?,re, .... The fi~rcgoinq instrum, ent was acknowle~lged r-c.~pecfivcty thc ' President and -.~'~rela? Of- a --corp~radouo on behalf o£O, aid corporation, who arc ped.s_o.n~ll.y known_fo me or haye produced My Commission Expires: BOARD C.F CO,!r~T¥ COHMISSIONERS 11!4~ }'} '"'~"~"",,.'..'2'2.~,~7:~ COLLIER CObrlTY, FLORIDA, ' PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS, .~-~'- ...... as identification, and who did (did.not) take an Oath. (l'y~c of ldcsuification),' .,,,~ . ~ r._ Notary Pubh~. Signature ' Print Name OR: 2386 PG' 3190 16C-5 EXHIBIT PAGE 1 OF 2 for PCS/Primeco L.P. Site: N. County Treatment Facility #63001 Collier County, Florida DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ELECTRIC UTILrT'Y EASEMENT A PARCEL OF LAND 10.00 FEET WIDE LYING IN THE NORTH I/2 OF' SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, RANGE 25 EAST AND THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH. RANGE 2S FAST, COL- I.IER COUNTY° FLORIDA; THE CENTERLINE OF SAID P/,RCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOL- LOWS: COMMENCING AT A CONCRETE MONUMENT AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27; THENCE N.00' 27'02"w. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF SAID SECTION 27, 540,65 FEET; THENCE 58"W., 24.07 FEET TO file POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAID PARCEL LYING 5.00 FEET ON EITHER SIDE OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENT[RUNE; THENCE N.44'J2'SB"E,, 41.12 FEET; THENCE N.OO'27'O2"W. ALONG A LINE PARALLEL wITH AND 5.00 FEET DA~Y OF Tile EAST LINE OF THE N.E. 1/4 OF' SAID SECTION 27. 744.51 FEET TO THE POINT OF TERMINATION, CONTAINING 7,§56 50UARE FEET OR 0.18 ACRES MORE OR LESS. MORGAN & EKLUND, INC. SuiTE I OF2 5222. JJ 12/I/97 EXHIBIT "A" PAGE 2 OF 2 10' UTILITY EASEMENT SKETCH cAL,~ - ;' 40' PARENT TRA CT IMPROVEMENTS NOT LOCATED PARENT TRA CT IMPROVEMENTS NOT LOCATED OR: 2386 PG: 3191 16C-3 for PCS/Primeco L.P. Site: N. County Treatment Facility M,63001 Collier County, Florida EXHIBIT MORGAN & EKLUND, INC. ~r~%SO. Ft 32970 P.O.T. · N. 44'32 '55"£. 24.07' $.89'32'58"W. P.OB. · .-~ *** OR: 2386 PG: 3192 *** EXHIBIT "B" Page I of 1 Florida Power & Light Company and Collier County agree that the right to permit any other person, firm or corporation to attach w~res to any facilities hereunder and lay cable and conduit within the easement and to operate the same for communication purposes shall be exercised only upon the express written approval of Collier County. Such approval will not be unreasonably withheld by Collier County. By acceptance of the easement herein granted, Florida Power & Light Company agrees upon removal of the subject electrical facilities, to release this easement from the pubhc records. MEMORANDUM TO: Ellie Hoffman Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Management FROM: ,Toni A. Mort S.v-' Real Property Specialist Real Property Management Department DATE: April 7, 1998 RE: First Amendment to Ground Lease Agreement//828 Collier County and PrimeCo Personal Communications, L.P. Please find attached an original, fully executed First Amendment to Ground Lease! Agreement, dated March 27, 1998, for your records. The Lease Agreement was approved by the Board of County Commissioners on February 3, 1998, Item No. 16C(3). Please feel free to contact me at extension 8991 with any questions concerning this matter. Thank you. attachments as stated CC: Jeff Walker, Director, Risk Managelnent Depamnent Gall J. Meincke, Personal Property Assistant Supervisor, Property Appraiser's Office 1 6C '5 Lease '~g2g FIRST AMENDMENT TO GROUN[) I.EASE AGREEMENT-PRIMECO TillS FIRST AMENDMENT TO GROUND [.EASE AGREEMEN'F-PRIMECO entered into this ~ ay }-/'r l ,i' i'.J . 199g at Naples, Collier County. Florida by and bctv. cen PrimeCo Personal C(~mmun~cati(ms. L P ~ a Delaware Limited Partnership ("PSC"). whose mailing address is "/77 Yamato Road. Suite 6OQ. Boca Raton. Florida 33.431. hereinafter referred Io as "TENANT". and Board of County Commissioners of Collier Counly. Florida, a political subdivision of the Stale of Florida. '.~.'hose mailing address is 3301 Easl Tamiami Trail. Naples. Florida 3..II 12. hereinafter referred lo as "OiVNF. R" WITNE. SSIiTII W!IEREAS. the TENANT and OWNER have previously entered into a Ground [.ease Agreement.PrimcCc~ date(! August 26. 1997, WliEREAS. the TENANT and O',,VNI(R arc desirous of amending the (}round I.casc Agtcement-I'rm'~c('c,. and NOW THEREFORE. in consideration of the cm.'chares and a?eemerus pro'.ided ,.,.ithin the ,~a~d Ground I ease Agreement-PrimeCo dated August 26. 1097 and Ten Dollars ($10 0% and other ,,'aluable cv, n~Mcratw, n. (Jr,-,und [.ease Agrecment-PrimcCo *s hereby amended as Article I Owner's Proper[,.. The l.eased ,\rea. And Tenant's Propea? of the Ground [.ease .\~reement- PrimeCo is hereb.,, deleted in its entirety and the follo~,.ing provision Is subst:tu.ed in its place .-\ O\VNER owns a parcel ofland at the follov.,ing street address 10500 Goodlette Frank Road. Naples. 3-.II 1% in the County of Collier. Florida. herein called I"O\VNER'S l.and"). :~.hich land is shot,.n on Exhibit ;~.hich is attached hereto and made a part hereof TENANT is in the ccmmmnicatmns business anti desires Io lease the LEASED AREA. {as hereinafter del~nedI from Oi\,'NER OWNER'Sproperl? is a parcel ,rffland that i~; larger m area than the LEASED ARE..',. The [.[-bXSFJ) ,.iRF. A is a part of ()WNIitUS l.and ..ill pcr',.onal pti,peris' brought onto the [.EASED AREA bvor on behalf of TENANT is referred I,', herein as "TI!NA"~T'S l"rc, pe~ty" An;' personal property brought onto the I.EAS[:.D ARE.A by ()WNER or on behalf of O~.i'NER ~s rctYrred herein as "O\VNER'S Properly" ..\ny properl',, t~r,mghl c, nto thc [.EASiFI) ARE .\ %. am. third palp.' is ret'['Ired hereto as "1 Nrd Party Propert.v" B OiVNbR hereb.,, leases the LI(.\SED AREA to TF. NAN[ lh,s Lease is nm a I. ra,":ch~se under an,,, la;,,., rule or regulation The LEASED AREA for the purposes of Ibis Agreement. s,~all ~e defined as a parcel land 40 feet by 50 feet equaling approximately 2.000 square (eel plu~ an access easement thereto, both are o~ ExNbit "C". and an electric utility easement depicted as 10 feel bv 74~ feet equaling appn',xmtatel~, sc,.uare t'eet as sho,.,, a on Exhibit "P," C OWNI:.R and TEN.ANT hereby agree that thc I.EASF. I) AREA mav be sur~,e?ed by a hccn,ed al TENANT'S costs. ,.,.hich su,"~ e.', may replace [:.xh~Nt "('" and become a F, nr: hereof and [hall ~.uf, ersede the E',,Nbit "C" m the event of any discrepancv bet,.~.ecn stlch sup, ev and the descnptmn of Paragraph I B. abo',e 2 Except as expressly provided herein, the (3round [.ease Agreement bet~.*.een PrimcCo Personal Communications. L P. a Delaware Limited Partnership ("PSC") and Collier Count...'. a political subdivision of the State of Florida. dated .August 26. 1907, I;3r utilization of thc premises described in said Ground I.case ,\grccmcnt remains m ~l tk~rce and effect according to the terms and conditions cc, nra,ned therein, anti said terms anti cc, ndmc. ns arc ap?hcable hereto except as expressly prm.~ded ott~erx,.ise he[em IN WITNESS WtlEREOF, the TEN,\NT and OWNER have hereto executed this First Amendment Ground l.easc ,.\$recmcn! thc day and year first ,above AS TO THE TENANT D,,\TED 2: ! '~,l "i ! , t f-- Wimcss' (sisna~urc): (print name) W~tnes~ ~d.~l~ (pri~[ name) PCS PrimeCo Personal Communications. I. P . a l)cla',,,arc I.imlted Parlncrship B Y -R o b-e-~-~ ~:ii~e-n-TT~;ect or STATE OF ' '- COUNTY OF ,',.' :,' ,.': ,%,,'t4 Thc foregoing First Amendment to Ground [.case Agrcernent-PrimcCo was acknowledged bcfi',rc me tt~is ~' "_ day of ~k'(C:' .... "~'-~ , 19~. by ROBF. RT KEI.TGEN. Technical Director. on behalforPrimeCo Per'renal Communications. L P. a D¢lawiirc [.imitcd Partnership I[¢ i,; personally kn_gv, n to mc or ha~; produced (type of identification), a~ idemification AS TO THE OWNER D/\TED ? .'-'7, ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk B 'f '/.-)'.4'.>"..-.-: ..... x ,/, ,..,..,. , Deputy Clerk (Si~unature o~Nolarv (Print Name of Nota~' l)ublic) NOTARY PUBI.IC Serial/Commission No My Commission Expires ........... Approved as to form and leg~ sf fficiency, Assistant County Altorney 16C PARENt' TRACT SKETCH EXHIBIT for PCS/Primeco L.P. Site: N. County Treatment Facility #63001 Collier County, Florida DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ELECTRIC UTILITY EASEMENT ,~ P~,~C~'L Or LAND ~000 FEET WtDE LYH'IO IN ThE NORTH 1/2 Or SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 48 SOUTH, L~E~ COgtlTv. FLOODs. h,E CENTERLINE OF SAID P~RCEL BEING uORE P~ICU~RLY DESCRIBED ~ COL- LO *~ COM~ENC',t~O AT A CONCRETE MONUUENf AT THE EAST 1/4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27; THENCE N0~ 27'02"W ALONG rile ~f LINE OF THE NE 1/4 Or SAID SECTION 27, 540 65 FEET: THENCE s. Bg'32' 5¢w., 24.07 FEET T0 THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF SAJD PARCEL LYING 5.00 rE~ ON E~THER SiDE or rile FOLLOWING DESCRIBED CENTERLINE; THENCE N.44'32'5¢'E., 41.12 FEET; THENCE N.O~27'07"w. ~LONG A LINE PAPALLEL ~TH ~ND 500 FEET E~3~Y OF THE EA3T LiNE Or file N.E. 1/4 Or S~D SECTION 27, 74451 FEET fO THE POINT OF TERMINATION. CONfA~N~hO 7,856 SQUARE FEEt OR 0.~8 ~CRES ~JORE Or LESS. St-tEE T 1 Of' 2 ~'~' ,~,~ ,~ .' ~'... ., ~ . .~,,,. 16C POT. / 10' UT1LITY EASEMENT SKETCH SCALE - ~" = .¢0' ~ ~ ,r,, PARENT TRA CT I.',.APRO',/EI~2ENTS NOT LOCATED POB. ~ , ..~ , L EASE' ,::,. ?A~NT TRA C7' t,',,APROVEUENTS rqOl LOCAIL'D PO.p.,. lot PCS/Primeco L.P. Site: N. County Treatmenl Facility #63001 ~'.o,c, Collier County, Florida · $.'~,EE~' 2 OF 2 , . . ,,'. ,,;. ~'~ :;~ 5222JJ DESCPJPTlON OF: PROPOSED LEASE PARCEL LEAS~ SiTE SKETCH 16C Roceived PurOna sir, l~ 250 Nafione~ P~ace Unit 152 Longwood, FL 32750 407-332-1718 Fax: 407-332-9309 February 17, 1998 Ms. Kelsey Ward Collier County Government 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Re: Agreement for Dehumidification Equipment Furnish and Install Dear Kelsey: Attached are four executed copies of this agreement, along with pholocopies of CTSl Corp.'s Certificate of Liability Insurance. CTSI does not do field installation work; we are a manufacturing company. This contract work does include installation. however; CTSI will be subcontracting this work to Conditioned Air Corp. Of Naples, FL, 4451 Mercantile Ave., Naples, FL 34104. Conditioned Air Corp.'s Certificate of Liability Insurance is also enclosed. Should you have any questions regarding this or need to discuss this with me, please do not hesitate to call. Very truly yours, C TS/Corporation encl CTSI MoistuRe-M~)y~r® ........ The Complete indoor Air Quality Solution James L. Cayce President AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into on this 3r'l day of February 1998, by and between CTSI Corporation, hereinafter called the "Contractor" anti Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, Collier County, Naples, hereinafter called the "County": WITNESSETH: COMMENCEMENT. This Agreement shall commence after receipt of the Notice to Proceed, in the form of a letter from the Contract Manager. Work shall be completed within 30 calendar days after receipt of permits. STATEMENT OF WORK. The Contractor shall provide four (4) MC 1000 Chilled water dehumidification units identical to the existing 4 units on the lower floors of the Administration Building. Two (2) MP 1000 DX units will be Provided for the lmmokalee Courthouse. Included in this Agreement is the installation required for all six (6) units in both locations. Installation for the Administration Building will be in the existing mechanical rooms. Chilled water piping, taps and pipe insulation will be performed bv the mechanical contractor. Equipment supports will be fabricated to set on the floor or suspend from the ceiling. Fabricate and install duct work from the existing outside air intake to the new units. For the Administration Building only, discharge air ducts will be fabricated and, installed by County personnel. Electrical and control wiring outside of the equipment, will also be handled by County personnel. Installation for the Immokalee Courthouse will be on the roof of the existing structure. The units will be anchored down to equipment supports. Externally insulated duct willI be run from each existing rooftop unit's outside air intake to the new outside dehumidification units. Electrical installation is included for this building along with roof curbs and lightning system tie-in if needed. Startup and checkout will be provided by CTSI for each location. A one year warranty on installation will begin on completion of startup date. An equipment warranty of one year plus an additional four },ear compressor warranty will begin on this same date. Page I of 5 " J6f] 1 o THE CONTRACT SUM. The County shall pay tine Contractor for tine performance of this Agreement an estimated maximum amount of eighty two thousand, five hundred twenty two dollars (S82,522.00), Contract sum is based on the price set forth in the contractor's proposal. COMPENSATION. The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Agreement upon completion of the work as accepted and approved by tine Project Manager and upon receipt (if a pr(~pm' invoict.. NOTICES. All notices from the County to the Contractor shall be deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to the Contractor at the following Address: 2517) National Place Unit 152 Longwood, FL 32750 All Notices from the Contractor to the County shall be deemed duly served if mailed by registered or certified mail to the Count,,, to: Collier County Government Center Facilities Management Department - General Services Bulb. ling 3301 Tamiami Trail, East Naples, Florida 34112 The Contractor and the County may change the above mailing address at any time upon giving the other party written notification. Ail notices under this Service Agreement must be in writing. NO PARTNERSHIP. Nothing herein contained shall create or be construed as creating a partnership between the County and the Contractor ~r to constitute the Contractor as an agent of the County. PERMITS: LICENSES: TAXES. In compliance with Section 218.80, F.S., all permits necessary for the prosecution of tine Work shall be obtained by the Contractor. Payment for all such permits issued by the County slnall be processed internally by the County. Ail non-County permits necessary for the prosecution of the Work shall be procured and paid for by the Contractor. The Contractor shall also be solely responsible for payment of any and all taxes levied on the Contractor. In addition, the Contractor shall comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the U. S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. The Contractor agrees to comply with alt laws governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to persons employed by the Contractor. Page 2 of 5 10. NO IMPROPER USE. The Contractor will not use, nor sufferor permit any person to use in any manner whatsoever, county facilities for any improper, immoral or offensive purpose, or for any purpose in violation of anv fetieral, state, county or municipal ordinance, rule, order or regulation, or of any governmental rule or regulation now in effect or hereafter enacted or adopted. In the event of such violation bv the Contractor or if the County or its authorized representative shall deem any conduct on the part of the Contractor to be objectionable or improper, the Count,,' shall have the right to suspend the contract of the Contractor. Should the Contractor fail to correct any such violation, conduct, or practice to the satisfaction of the County within twenty-four (24) hours after receiving notice of such violation, conduct, o.' practice, such suspension to continue until the violation is cured. The Contractor further agrees not to commence operation during the suspension period until the violation has been corrected to the satisfaction of the County. TERMINATION. Should the contractor be found to have failed to perform his services in a manner satisfactory to the County as per the specifications and requirements of this Agreement, the County ma`., terminate said agreement immediately for cause; further the County may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a seven (7) day written notice. The Count`.' shall be sole judge of non-performance. NO DISCRIMINATION. The Contractor agrees that there shall be no discrimination as to race, sex, color, creed or national origin. 11. INSURANCE. The Contractor shall provide insurance as follows: Commercial General Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include Premises and Operations; Independent contractors; Products and Completed Operations and Contractual Liability. Business Auto Liability: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000 Per Occurrence, Combined Single Limit for Bodily Injury Liability and Property Damage Liability. This shall include: Owned Vehicles, Hired and Non-Owned Vehicles and Employee Non-Ownership. C. Workers' Compensation: Insurance covering all employees meeting Statutory Limits in compliance with the applicable state and federal laws. The coverage must include Employers' Liability with a minimum limit of S1,000,000 for each accident. Special Requirements: Collier County shall be listed as the Certificate Holder and included as an Additional Insured on the Comprehensive General Liability Policy. Page 3 of 5 '.-.),, ~. 12. Current, valid insurance policies meeting the retluirement herein identified shall be maintained by Contractor during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal certificates shall be sent to the County 30 days prior to any expiration date. There shall be a 30 day notification to the County in the event of cancellation or modification of an,,' stipulated insurance coverage. Contractor shall insure that all subcontractors comply with the same insurance requirements that he is required to meet. The same Contractor shall provide County with certificates of insurance meeting the required insurance provisions. INDEMNIFICATION. The Contractor/Vendor, in consideration of Ten Dollars (SI0.00), the receipt and sufficiency of which is accepted through the signing of this document shall hold harmless and defend Collier County anti its agents and employees from ail suits and actions, including attorneys' fees and all costs of litigation and judgments of any name and description arising out of or incidental to the performance of this contract or work performed thereunder. This provision shall also pertain to any claims brought against the Count',' bv an`,, employee of the named Contractor/Vendor, an`,' Subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by an`,' of them. The Contractor/Vendor's obligation under this provision shall not bt: limited in any way bv the agreed upon contract price as shown in this Contract or the Contractor/Vendor's limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. The first Ten dollars (S10.00) of money received on the contract price is considered as payment of this obligation by the County. This section does not pertain to any incident arising from the sole negligence of Collier Count`,'. Page 4 or5 -5 c.,C z/(9l'~ 16g 1 12. 13. CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of the County by the Facilities Management Department.. COMPONENT PARTS OF THIS CONTRACT. This Contract consists of the attached component parts, all of which are as fully a part of the contract as if herein set out verbatim: Contractor's Proposal, Insurance Certificate. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Contractor arm the County, have each, respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands anti seals on the date and year first above written. ATTEST: Dwight E. Brock, Clerk of Courts Dated: (SEAL) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Barbara B. Berr9, Chairmhn ' CTSI Corporation Contractor First Witness Si gna tu re 't'Type/print witness name? Second Witness James h. Cayce, President/Owner Typed signature and title ?Type/print witness name? Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: cc: rFhomas C. Palmer Assistant County Attorney CORPORATE SEAL (corporations only) Page 5 of 5 'A_CORD. CERTIFICATE PRODUCER PO BOX 951419 3697 LAKE E~94A RD CLOCK TOWER LAKE MARY FL 32746 OF LIABILITY INSURANCE csR CTSIC-1 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON TH~. CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURED COMeANY B Valiant Insurance Company : CO;'~ PANY CTSI Corporation C ZC INSUP. ANCE COMPANY 250 National Place #152 eOM"ANY Longwood FL 32750 O COVERAGES THIS I.~ TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEtl ISSUED TO THE INSURED ~'JAIMEO ABOVE FOR THE POI.ICY PERIO0 INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING AhW REQUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITION OF ArS,/ CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE ~USURANCE AFFORDED BY THE FOLICtES DESCRIBED HEREIN I$ SL'RJECT TO ALL THE TERMS. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS, CO I TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE I POLICY EXPIRATION : LTR[ DATE IMM/DO;YY) [ DATE IMMIOD/YY) I LIMITS GENERAL LIABILITY X; COiMMERCIAL GEt'~ER, A__L__L!AeILITY J OWNER'S & COfiTRACTOR'$ PROT EPA22339320 05/12/97 GENERAL AGGREGATE ! $ 2 , 000 ~000 05/12/98 i PRODUCTS COMP/OPAGG j I 2,000,:000 PERSOU^L&ADV,,JURY [' 1,0007~.00 ...... '-i-' 0 0 : MED EXP ~,'v on* ~,~1 ', I 5~00o AU I'OMOBI[ E LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS ~__~ SCHEDULED AUTOS J~X HIRED AUTOS NONOWNED AUTOS ECA22283981 05/12/97 05/12/98 BODILY INJURY i PROPERTY DAMAGE GARAGE LIABILITY L.---J A,"IY AUTO AUTO ONLY · EA ACCIDENT ' I OTHER THAN AUTO or~ILY: EACH ACCIDENT AGGREGATE A EXCESS LIABILITY ! UMBRELLA FORM ; OTHER THAN UMBRELLA FOR~.I WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY THE PROPRIETOR/ ItICL PARTNERS/EXECUTiVE 19708646098 01/01/98 EACH 0CCURREhlC[ : l, AGGREGATE .~ $ $ · WC STAtU OTH-~ [.E}?CH ACC,OE,,T .~ $ 100,000 01/01/99 ' EL D,SE,S[* "OUCY LlUIT i ~ 500, 000 ~LO,S~S~.EA~.~OY~[ ~ S 100.000 OTHER UMBRELLA U895525573 05/12/97 05/12/98 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS~EHICLES/SPECIAL ITemS C~;RTIFICATE HOLDER IS ADDITIONAL INDSURED UNDER GENERAL LIAIBILITY. CERTIFICATE HOLDER Collier County Government 3301 E. Tamtami Trail Naples FL 34112 ACORD 25-S (I195l COLLCTY CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAI~ 3 0 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT. BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR EIAB#.ITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPANY. ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATrVE$. ' RD. PRODUCER Smith-Lesher Insurance, Inc. 671,Goodlette Rd., Suite 130 Pc;.~t Office Drawer 1587 Naples FL 34106 Huntley A. "Bud" Hornbeck II PhoneNo. 941-262-870_1_ _~,~.N0~_9..4_1:262.~-5360 INSURED CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANC'. SR · ' v 'CONDI-2 02/11/98 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AHD CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CER'rlFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR~ ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. COMPANIES AFFORDING COVERAGE Conditioned Air Corp Of Naples Inc. 4451 Mercantile Avenue Naples FL 34104 COMPANY A COMPANY B COMPANY C COMPANY D Travelers Prop & Casualty/Aetn COVERAGES THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THF POL)CiES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAA~ED ABOVE. FOR THE POt iCY PERIO0 INOICATED. NO~THSTANOIN~ ANY R[OUIREMENT. TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CON[RA(;T OR OTll[~ [)OCli&lENt V~TH H( SPEC~ ~O ~tlCl( THIS CERTIFICATE MAY B~ ~SSUE~ O~ MAy PERTAIN THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES O[SCRIB[D HEREIN 15 SUEJECT T~ ALL TH~ TERMS EXCLUSIONS ~NO CONDITIONS 0¢ SUCH POLICIES LIMITS SHC'/~ MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAIO CLAIM ! TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER I POLICY EFFECTIVE LTR ~ OATE IMM~DD~) G_._ENERAL LIABILITY ~_~.~OMMERCIAI G E NE RAL LIABILITY iA_!JTOMOBILE LIABILITY _~ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS ~'~ON-OWNE D AUTOS GARAGE LIABILITY ! ANY AUTO EXCESS LIABILITY __~ IJMBRELIJ~ FORM ; OTHER THAH UMBRELLA FORM I680199Y0185 04/01/97 POLICY EXPIRATION DATE (MM/OD/Y'Y) LIMITS COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT ' BODILY INJURY BODILY INJURY {Per acc~enI) PROPERTY DAMAGE : AUTO ONlY · EA ACCIDENT OTHER THAN AUTO ONlY EACH ACCIDENT AGGREGATE EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE WORKERS COMPENSA'F1ON AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY THE PROPRIETOR/ INC~ PARTNERS,I[XECUTIVE OFFICERS ARE EXCL , WC STATU- , OTH* .... LT_OR.y L M TS_.~__ I. ER. EL EACH ACCIDENT EL DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT EL D~SEASE - EA EMPLOYEE OTHER DE~R'PTIDN OF OPERATION~A~ONS/VEHICLE~SPECIAL tlEMS Air conditioning systems CERTIFICATE HOLDER CTSI Corporation 250 National Place Unit #152 Lon~wood FL 32750 ACORD 25-S (1195) CTSIC-1 CANCELLATION ~ SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE TH~ EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF. THE ISSUING COMPANY W1LL ENDEAVOR TO MAILi! 10 DAYS WRITTEN No'ncE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMEf.) TO ~HE LEFT. SUCH NOTICE SHAll IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE COMPA, NY. ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATiVeS. ©ACORD CORPORATION 1~88 FIRSI' AMENDSIENI' 'I'O 1997 TOURISM BETWEEN COI.[.IER COUNTY AND GUI.F B:\Y .NI:\RINE M:\N,\GEMENT, INC. 1998, bv and between Gulf Bay Marine Management, Inc., a Florida corporaUon, }~ereinallcr referred to as "GRANTEE" and C~ollicr County, a potilical subdivision of tire State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "COtJNT'~'." I~[:~CITALS WHEREAS. the COUNTY and thc Gulf Bay Marine Management, Inc. entered into a 1997 Tourism Agreement dated June 24, 1997 (the "Agreement"); anti WtIEREAS, tile Gulf P~ay Marine Management, Inc. lilts requested that certain linc ilcm changes be made in tire budget; and WHEREAS, the requested line item changes are within ibc original total budget; and W}tEREAS, thc COUNTY agrees to the requested changes. \VITNESSETH: NOW, THEREFORE, B,.kSED UPON THE MUTUAL COVENANTS HEREIN AND OTHER VALUABLE CONSIDERATION TItE PARTIES AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Exhibit "A" to the Agreement shall be deleted in its entirety and replaced with thc Exhibit "A" at!ached to this Agreement. and c£ffect. Except as provided herein, all other terms of lire Agreement remain in fl, II force IN WITNESS WFtEREOE, thc GRANTE[! and COUNTY have each respectively, by an - I - 16fl authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. DWIGItT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA WITNESSES: l'nntcd"r5 pod Name Approved as to form and legal sufficiency GRANTEE Gulf Bay Marine Management, Inc. By: Prmted,"Fypcd Name I'rmtcd, Typed 'l'itlc (corporate seal) Heidi F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney f:~c¥.",1907 TIX' Agrccments, I '~ Amend (;ulf Bay Marine Managcmcnl. Inc - 2 - EXtIIBIT "A" Advertising, layout, graphics & arlwork Radio advertising Print Advertising Television advertising Total Budget $ 6,500 21 15,¢)¢)0 7.500 S5o,000 - 3 - 16G 1' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MISCELLANEOUS CORRESPONDENCE FEBRUARY 3, t998 FOR BOARD ACTION: I. MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS DIRECTED: 2. Minutes: Airport Authority - minutes of October 13, 1997 and agenda for December 15, 1997 and January 12, 1998. Referred to BCC. The Beach Renourishment/Maintenance Committee - agenda for January 8, 1998. Referred to BCC. Black Affairs Advisory, Board - minutes of February. 10, February 24, May 12, June 9, September 8, October 13, November 10 and November 26, 1997. Referred to BCC. Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council - minutes of November 24, 1997 and agenda for December 17, 1997. Referred to BCC. Environmental Advisory Board - minutes of December 3, 1997 and agenda for January 7, 1998. Referred to BCC, Golden Gate Beautification Advisory, Committee - minutes of November 12, 1997 and agenda Ibr December 9, 1997. Referred to BCC. Go Health Department Advisory Board - minutes of December 1, 1997. Referred to BCC. Historical & Archaeological Preservation Board - minutes of December I!, 1997 mid agenda of January 16, 1998. Referred to BCC. Isle of Capri Fire & Rescue District - minutes of July 10, August 7, September 1 I, October 2, November 14, November 21, December 4, and agenda of December 4, 1997. Referred to BCC. Landfill & Materials Recovery Facility Citizens Advisory Committee - minutes of November 19, 1997 and agenda of December 11, 1997. Referred to BCC. K. Library Advisory Board - minutes of November 24, 1997. Referred to BCC. Parks & Recreation Advisory Board - minutes o£Novem?,' To. I oq't and for December 17, 1997. Referred to BCC. / AGENp,~ No. /[~ FEB 03 1998 Other A. Planning Commission - minutes ofNovember 6 & 15, 1997 and agenda of December 18, 1997 and January 15, 1998. Referred to BCC. Productivity Committee - minutes of November 19, 1997. Referred to BCC. Letter from Michael A. Welsh, Controller, Guy Carlton's Office, referencing distribution of Current Ad Valorem Tax and Non-Ad Valorem Assessment to BCC after Tax Collector's commissions. Also attached a distribution cap showing year to date totals of taxes collected net ofdiscount for 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1997. Referred to BCC. Letter from Terry. White. Executive Director of Area Agency on Aging for SW FL, [nc. reporting AAA's administrative monitoring visits with Collier County Services for Seniors on October 28-29 & November 13, 1997. Referred to BCC. FEB 03 1998 Pgo A I I~i~()I,UI' ,-\ t q'! !() P, ITY MINUTES OF OCTOBER 13, 199'7 AP PROVEi) 12/15/9.7 ME.MI~EP, S Richard Anclcrson PI,tESENI": Steve l'ricc ABSENT: l{rncst Spinclli STAFF: John l)rurv Teresa 'l'homas PUBLIC: None (icorkze P, arron..qr. I Icrbcrt Noren Slevcn Rocco Thonms Palaver Mome [.azaurs Michael \Villiams .loAnne l.camcrI i~'c. I. MEETING CALLEI) TO ORI)EI,t AND QUOP, UM CHECK C,O?'!':S Meeting called lo order al I:00 p.m. and quorum was prcsenl. Il. API~ROVAL OF A(;ENI)A ;i Mr. Price moved to amend tile agenda as tbllows: Add: VII.A. Terminal Building ()pen I lousc and VII.I½. CAP Sublease. Mr. Barron seconded tile motion. Motion passed unanimously. III. APPROVAl, OF MINUTES Mr. Barron moved Io approve thc minutes of.qcptembcr 15. 1997. Mr. Noren seconded the nlolion. Motion passed unanimously. IV. ADMINI,WI'RATIVE a. Business PI:in - Operational Budget- Fund 495 Mr. Drurv discussed Iht Iwo ,~ptions for tile Fund 495 break cvcn need ~,nd requested tile Autho~ly discuss and choose an option and direct stall'to place said option into thc Business I'hm. Mr. Price stated by thc year 2006 wc arc ahead o1' what we were prior to Iht Airport Authority being created. Mr. Price explained that il' you compare salaries and expenses the county incurred iht Authorities cost arc less plus we are providing services that were not provided in the past. Mr. I.azarus would like tile Business Plan lo highlight tile past services and costs vs. services and cost l~orrb(~r, l,azarus also sg~tjested placing tile revenues ot' t\~cl up front. ~lancock / Constant tne I Berry Mr. Price moved to approve "Option A" se\ecl t, comments. %Ir. lklrnm sccm~dud lhe motion. Motion passed unarfimmmly. b. Business Plan - Capital Budget- Fund 496 Mr. Drurv discussed the (.'apital Improvement Plan fi)r Ibc next ten years and requested tile Aulb,~rity discuss and instruct staff to insert same into tile Business I'tan. Mr. [?,arron moved to accept thc Capitol Inaprovemcnt Plan and incorporate into thc Business Plan in principal. Mr. North .seconded thc motion. Motion passed unaninmusly. c. Environmental Award Mr. Drury stated the l£nvironmental Award package has been submitted to FAA for consideration. ,The Authority would like to commend l)ulYcsnc-I Icnry. Inc.. Florida linvironmcntal, and Teresa Thoma~ Ibr putting this package together Lmdcr tight time l'ramcs Ibr the Authority. ' d. l)ufresne-llcnr3.', inc. Annual Contract Renewal Mr. Drury explained tile Collier County Airport Authority entered into a professional services agreement with DutYesne-t lcnry, Inc. For consulting and engineering services. Thc agreement was renewed in 1~)95 and 1996. Staff is rccomn~ending that thc agreement be renewed For an additional one year term. Mr. Barron moved to approve Resolution No. 97-32 which executes thc third amendment Io ,Iht professional services agreement. Mr. Price seconded ibc motion. Motion passed unanimously. V. EVER(;LAi)ES AII,tPARK a. Florida's Outstandin,_ llural Community Award Mr. Drury explained thc Airport Authority was asked to submit with thc School Board a summary of recent projects accomplishcd which bcnelited the Everglades Cit.,.' Community. Each year the State of Florida awards a community recognition lbr outstanding improvements. I lelcne Caseltinc oF?thc Housing Urban Improvement is preparing the submittal. b. Appraisal Mr. Drury explained the original appraisal For tile land adjacent to tile airport rel]cctcd Ihir market value to be $315.000 lbr the 3.62 acre piece of vacant land or $2.00 per square foot. The Authority had concerns that thc appraisal did not accurately reflect current conditions of the property and bad concerns on the compatibles used. so the Authority requested a tbrmal reviex~' appraisal of thc properly. The review appraisal bas been completed and the t~ir market value has been reduced to $197.000 or $1.25 per square thor. 16G 1, Mr. Price questioned what grants arc oul there to purchase the vacant land': Mr. I)rury stated there arc 75% grants. Mr. Price moved to accept tile review appraisal, Mr. Barron seconded thc motion. Motion passed unanimously. c. Obstruction Removal Proiec~ il Mr. Drur>' requested thc Authority authorize staff to work with tile Board of County Commissioner, s to utilize $10.000 of Airport Authority budgeted reserves to add phase txvo to phase one to take advan{hge of and match a 54f1.¢)00 grant to accomplish this safety project. Mr. Price moved to approve l>,csolution No. 97-33 with the amendment to use tile least amount of money to clear tile obstruction and bring thc findings back to the Authority. Mr. North seconded thc motion. Motion passed unanimously. VI. IMMOKALEE REGIONAL AIRPORT a. Scrub .lay Plan/Obstruction Removal Mr. Drury requested thc Authority authorize staff to work with tile Board of County Commissioners to utilize Authority budgeted reserves to go tbrward with these two safety projects as prcrequisiles,lbr revenue producing projects, ii Mr. Price movcd lo approve Resolution No. 97-34 authorizing tile development of thc two saliet>' projects: (1) Obstruction Removal and (2) Scrub .lay Plan hnplcmentation sub. jcct to a more detailed explanation ol'the plan at next meeting. Mr. Barren seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. VII. MARCO ISLAND EXECUTIVE AII,IPORT a. Terminal Building Open Ih)use Mr. l)rury qucslitm xvhcn tile ,,\uthoritv would like to have tile open house and Christmas party? :' Thc Authority xvouid like to hold thc open house and Chrismaas party on l)cccmbcr 15"' prior to thc scheduled Authority meeting. ~ b. CAP Sublease Agrccmen! Mr. Drury stated tile Authority ilceds to vote on approving tile amended Sublease Agreement betv,,iOen tile Authority and CAI'. Mr. Price moved to approve thc amended St, blcase Agreement. ,",,Ir. Anderson seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimouslv. VIII. OLI) BUSINESS- None IX. NEW BUSINESS a. FY 97-98 Conferences Mr. Williams stated he feels we need to spread thc word about the negotiations of the Immokale¢ Regional Airports designated Foreign Trade Zone and would like to attend tim Air (.'argo conference being held in Miami. I:I. for one day. Mr. Price moved for Mr. Williams to represent thc ^uthority by attending the 10/3{)!97 conference in Miami and he will donate thc money to pay lbr this. Mr. Williams feels the Authority should pay for this conference. Mr. Price agrees but would like fi>r thc hnmokalcc Chamber of Commerce to participate and helP promote lmmokalec. , Mr. Barron seconded thc motion. Motion passed unanimously. X. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 2:40 p.m. DATE: PLACE: TIME: 16G 1 RECEIVED COLLIER COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY 0EC ', 0 1997 AGENDA December 15, '1997 Marco Island Executive Airport, 2003 Mainsail Drive, Conference Room, Naples, FL 1:00 P.M. VI. VII. VIII. IX. X. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Airport Authority will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record will include all testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Call Meeting to Order and Quorum Check Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes Administrative a. Business Plan Update- Monte Lazarus/Steve Price b. Brokerage Fees - Michael Williams c. Resignation Operabons Director - Steve Rocco d. Uniform Policy e. Fuel Purchasin§ Options f. C.P.I. Calculations Everglades Airpark a. National Park 50''~ Rededication Immokalee Regional Airport a. U.S. Army Permit b. Scrub Jay Plan Marco Island Executive Airport a. Terminal Rehabilitation Supplemental Grant b. Supplemental Work Order c. Taxiway Project Old Business New Business Adjournment Nor r ~ 5 Hancock Co~$t~nt tne M~c'lr, le Berry u,.,p~os DATE: PLACE: TI M E: COLLIER COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY AGENDA January 12, 1998 Marco Island Executive Airport, 2003 Mainsail Drive, Conference Room, Naples, FL 1:00 P.bI. II. III. IV. VII. VIII. IX. X. An)' person who decides to appeal a decision of this Airport Authority will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record will include all testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Call Meeting to Order and Quorum Check Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes Administrative a. Newsletter Everglades Airpark a. Aircraft Incidents Immokalee Regional Airport a. Award Construction Bid b. Preliminary Design Manufacturing Incubator Marco Island Executive Airport a. B-17 and B-24 \V\\'II Aircraft Bombers b. Obstruction Removal and Taxiway Progress - Monte Lazarus c. 710 Foot Tower Old Business New Business Adjournment ,/ ~rrt$ Hancock /' Constantine_ ~.~ ._ Mac'lC~e / .. Berr~ l/ ....... Cop!~s To: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 735 EIGHTH STREET SOUTH NAPLES, FLORIDA 34102 941-434-4655 FAX 941-434-3059 SUNCOM 974-4655 NOTICE OF PUBLIC P[EETING The Beach Renourishment/Maintenance Committee announces a meeting to which all interested persons are invited. DATE: Thursday 08 January 1998 TIME: 9:00 A.M. PLACE: City Council Chambers, 735 Eighth Street Florida 34102 public South, Naples, AGENDA o o Roll Call. Consideration of approval of the minutes of the 04 December 1997 meeting. Project updates: A) South Channel/Water Turkey Bay; B) Wiggins Pass dredging; C) dune revegetation; D) upland sand stockpiling; E) rock removal. Consideration of approval of TDC funding applications for monitoring T-groins and segmented breakwater on the Marco Island beach. Discussion of rescheduling next meeting, which conflicts with Florida Shore & Beach Preservation Association technical conference. Agenda for next meeting, 05 or 12 February 1998. Open public input. Adjourn. DECISION ~ADE BY THIS C~.~iTTEE W~TH RESPECT TO ~Y ~ATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE ~K~EED[NGS ~D ~Y NEED TD ~t;SURE T~% A VErbATIM RECORD ES ~ADE, ~ICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTI~NY ~O EVIDENCE UPON ~[CH T~E AP~ ~S TO ~E H~.D. ~Y PE~ON WiTH A DISABILITY REQU;~NG Ab~IL~Y AIDS ~D SERVICES ~R THiS MEETING ~Y C~L THE CITY CLE~'K'S O~FiCE AT ~34-4~i WiTH REQUESTS AT L~T TWO BUS;NESS DAYS 8E~RE THE MEETING DATE. For additional information, please contact Jon Staiger at 4655. Jon/~. Staiger, Ph.D~ Natural Resources Manager / t~orr 15 '~://_ Hancock / .... ¢cmstantine _. ~, , ,._ ~&c'Kle 434- 16G 1' F'qEC EI'~'ED ,]?'r "t997 )~orr is !'./' Hancock Constantine Mac'Kle v/ / Berr~ f/,isc. Corres: ~ I / / Copies 16G 1 !6G '1~ .) Nhnulcs ol the Mi?' 12. 1~,97 Meelmg BAAB Mcmbcrs Prc~mt: Bob Bennel! Garland E,lmom. on Douglas %~,dson (by. lcl~honc~ li~' ~ nH~lc Staff Prr~:nt. Jcrmdet J. EO',~ards Invited Gu.: ~' Joe Palcrm, I'hc race*ar.g ~sas called to order at 6.15 ~.m IX'b-. $oe Pa~cmo. £xccm~,: Din:clot of thc Southwcs't Flori~ Wo,k Force Devclopmtmt f~ard explained thc ur~nizaticn of thc new I,~'~e; and Edamation Panncrsh~p {IF'P) lmtiabv¢s Nh' Paterno heads a 45 member board which ~s comprised of rel:rrsentaUv¢s from government, thc i:mva~¢ ~cctor. ~s '~¢11 as corrtmuml? based or,tSa.m.z, auc ~t~ from five counties J'E? f'u. nd~ ;.c alloc, Jtcd fo;' lhc following four irdtialivc$: I) Welfare-fo.-Work; 21 .~:hool-to.-Work; 3) High Skdlffthgh Wagj:: 4} One Stop Carnet Centers They were nol specified for "rmnorip,.' &'w¢lopmcnf'. as we origin, ally bcli~'~ Mr Palcmo has ag/~x-xl BA,,M3 infcrmed of future opemn~ and dcvclopmen~s Thc mo6o~, ss;~s rt~, sc-x:ondcd and passed to apgro..c the m~nulc's of thc April 14.1~97 meeting The mcmb~:r~hJp disc-u&~ed having a public forum on mmonty cmplo:,ms ,n public ¢mpto)'mcn! It ,~ Itel thc P~cT, oscd "staffck'velopme-m" was an tssue for rnanagemcnt CCEF's C~.lden Apple tca,'au:r selection proccss was chsc'ussed Thc memtx-~xh~p ~as sansfied that the lack of Bl:.sck lcacl'.crs ~tcc'tcd was due in part 1o thc small number of Black leachers ~n thc comJ'au/u~'. as v, cll as low parlicipaticn of Black ~eac'hers in Ibc contcsl. Mcmbcxships of C, urland Yxtmomon. Doug Wilson ami oth<:r$ will expire m June 19)7 The ts,o members pm'senl exl~e~sed n willinism.-ss to conhnu~ to ~rve on the board_ 'Fh~ bo,'m:l ~pproved Garland £dmonson's le~tc~ to the Board of County Commissionc~. in suppo~l of IIAAB's proposal The meeting was adjourn~;l. Respec ,/subm~ tied, / ., !6G 1 ,Minulcs of Iht' Black Affairs Advisory Board II]AABI .hme 0. 1997 BAAB Members l'rc,lcul: Bob P, cnnctl Garhmd l:.dln(,nson I lenry Tribblc Vivicnnt' Nichaus Vivian St. l.ouis Staff Present: Michellc Edwards Ara,Id Eric Baird and Doug Wilson xvcrc hmh excused I'r~m~ the meeting. 'lhe meeting was called Io order at 6:15 p.m. 'the motion v, as made, seconded and passed Io approve thc m inulcs of Ibc May 12, 19o7 rattling. Thc new County Administralor was unable lo atlend Ibc meeting. I lowever, the Board rcqueslcd lhal he be invited Io lhe nexl meeting. The County Manager Selection Process was discussed and lhe BAAB recommended thc lidlowing: · The County make an el'fort lo advertise on the intcrnct for job availability. · ttumnn Resources should prepare a list of publications that ~hcy would regularly place advenisemcms in. IleaO' 'Fribble indicated d~at he was aware of a publication Ihat specializes in job search rot minorities am~mld ~ thi~ in~t~io~o }[timan [~ }long' also oflErcd to draft a brief leuer of apprecialion to Ibc I luman Resources Depanmcnl. The members asked Michelle Io comaci Al Robinson and Frederick Morgan to inquired about their absence al the last few meetings. Bob Bennett indicated that he submitted his resume to Joe Pntcrno l~r considcralion for membership on the gouthwest Florida Work Force I)cvclopmcnt Board [SWI:WFI)B]. The BAAB agreed lo wait fl~r a response 1o Ihi~l submittal bcl~rc a recommendation x~,t~lct be made fi~r BAAB representation on the SWI:WI:DIL There was some discussion of thc letter to Frank Rodriquez from the Board of County Commissioners in response to the letter from Ibc I IAAB which Ihe BAAB endorsed. Il was mentioned that Frank Rodriqucz has some concerns wilh the school systcm and the problem witls special programs, lt was recommended that the BAAB Iook at the school system m talent;Fy areas and iss,cs of interest. The BAAB noted that lhe'..' would tike to base more presence in community activities. Thc group discussed putting together an agenda of items to discuss for lhe coming years. TheBAAllagrccdlt~postponcdmceting for the summer. Ifa special meeting is required, then one will bc scheduled. The next meeting of the BAAB will be lhe second Monday in September. The meeting was ad ourned ,'al 7:00 p.m Respect full?' submitted. Michelle lltlt~2ls Arnold 16G'l Minules of Ihe I{lack Affairs ^dviso~ Board ~BAAIq September 8, 1997 P, AA[I Nlcmhcrs l'rc~,cnt: Bob Bennett I lenD' Trihble Vivienne Niehaus Vivian St. I,ouis Frederick Morgan Staff Present: Michclle Edwards Arnold I)oug Wilson ',,,';is excused from the rnceting. The meeting ,,,,'as called t~ order at 6:20 p.m. '['}lc Counly Adminislralor, Hob Fernandez, was isis() present. The motion x~ as made. seconded and passed to approve thc minutes of the June 9, 1997. meeting with a correction to delete thc no~mion ff~at I lcnr':' Tribblc woukl provide the I luman Resources l)cpamnunt with information. Thc County Administratt~r ,.'.';is inlroduccd and made sore,: brief comments cxlcnding his assislance to Ihe BAAB. t lcnry Tribble handed out copies of thc draft loner hc prepared regarding the BAA B's proposal for the County *lanagcr Selection Process. The m~mbers reviewed the letter and recommended changes for the final correspondence. Mr. Fernandez commented that he has directed the Iluman Resources Department to subscribe to the lC,MA Joblinc which is a minority publication for his profession. There ,,vas much discussion of the number and terms of the vacant BAAB positions. Thc lhrcc new applicants wcrc in attendance to introduce themselves lo the Board and express their interests. The BAAB recommended that the Board o£County Commissioners appointment all candidales who submitted a resume. Thc decision for the term of ofl~cc to bc served by the newly appointed members would be made by the Board of County Commissioners. There ,.,,':is some discussion of thc lulcs that govern Ifc BAA B and whether a majority of Ih,: active members could act on business. ,'vlr. Fernandez recommended float the BAAB revisit their proposal to amend the ordinance offered his assistance in thist mattcr. Sir. Fernandez also suggcsted that lhe Office of Public Information be utilized to improve upon the notices that are issued to announce vacancies on advisory boards. Bob Bennett reported that he spoke v.'ith Joc Paterno who informed him that there ,,,,'ere no vacancies on thc Southwest Florida Work Force Development Board [SWFWFDB]. The remaining items were continuc,] to thc ncxl meeting. Thc rattling was adjourned al 7:.10 p.m. Respect fully submitted. Michellc Edwards Arnold 31inures of lhe Blnck Afl'airs Advis(~rv Bo,rd (IIAAB) .%leering October 1.3. i~9':: B,-'k.-\B Mernbezs present t ten:v T ri. bble MicY. ele F~tzgera;d i-fa=er Kan:: F. ngi:sk V:v~cnnc Inh?.snn Staff Present Mic,Scllc Edwa:ds l.av. rence Pivacek - Assistant County Anornev Guest Speaker .',.larcv Kn.:mbine - Vice Chairman. Florida Parent [:.ducato~s Assoc The met:ting ;vas called to order ~t 6 12 p m Ihc motion was made. seconded a,qd passcd to approve thc nnnutcs of thc Scplcmbcr ~;. 1997 meeting [itL.M3 rcv~ev.'cd th¢ minute~ cf the Board ol'('ountv Commissioners' September 23, meeting cunng v, Nch lhc nppcnntmcnt of B..\AIt'', mcmhcr~ :,..as dlscusscg Fo,'"rncr member Doug Wilson was nc~I ~eappoimed by thc B(iC' because of ~ "pot~:ntiaY' litigation ,n'.ol:'mg the count',' The sugges:loa was made lhat v,;c address the B(t(' regarding cstablNhing, pohcy R~ ser'ving on :he B.-LA.B. pa~icularl?' since there arc ofl~cr attornt:):, st.r,.ing c,n BzY..M3 The point ~,.as mad~ that r.o real conflict o£imerest exists, since BA..\B has nc, decision-making authority Members mav simply abstain I?om voting on issues where ~hey ma,,' have a special intere~t.-similar 1o the BCC Fi~gerald t"~alc~ will draft a letter ic~ ,,he BC'C' req,es~ing 1o be placed on lhe agenda oftheir nexl meeting u~ d~scuss Ibis issue furtht:r ",,'i,.ienne Johnson Niehaus was elected Sccrcta:'v o1' t3,"~kt3, succeedinB Alfred Robinson, Jr The Immokalee Recreation 8: Aqualic Center ditcussion '.,,as continued until the ne<'t meeting. There ~,as an in-depth discussion of the "DaFti:ne Ordinance" ~,.h;ch Judge Baker has proposed to tl:e B('C 'FL~s would impose a da.~qm~c "truanc.', ' curfew for school aged children l.awrenee Pivacek, ofithe county attorney's off'icc, cxpl,w, cd thte mlt:nl of the new ordinance as an adjunct to the existing Infancy laws, which are enforceable by the school braa~ds Marcy Krumbinc presented the florae Educators A.~,ociant:on's position on this ordinaa~ce They are concerned ti'tat rnanv voting: people ma,. t,t. v,'rongfl~Ily detained and halla$st:d BAAB resolved to awa,t the dc:ads ot en:brcement and impiementat~on before making a reccommendation 16G goa:d member. Kann Engli.~h made a prcscnta;ion cfa '"Proposed Plan Of Action" for the, nex! ~c',.~..~al vua~s l: ir:eluded a o,mprehcnsi,..e ou:lin~., of ~,hor't-t~rm and long-term goals For BA.A. 8. v, gh an emphasis on commurdty ouueach and fund-fa, s n? in. Jtiati,.'es She in.tends to presen! :his proposal to tile county manager for apprnvaI M,chelt..At,s'~in and F~t.,'.g~'rald F,at,.-~ ~.ill collaberatt-,m dra;'t, ing Ih~ :,:w by-laws h.n BAAB The mee6n8 '.,,'as adjourned [ k'luv (' 'l';ibblc. (.'hahman 51inut¢5 or th~ Black Af]air~ Ad, is,tv Board (13AAB) .Merting November I0. 1"99~, BAAR Merr',hcr~, presen'~' Bob B~nn~t }knry 'l'ribh~c Eric Baird Michcle Austin Fitz;zerald Frater Karin English vivitnnc lohnson .Xiehaus Michelle Edwards Arnold The rneetm.g was called Io order a.~ ~, 2r, ? m Il The minutes of the Sap:ember 8. 1'/~/? ;=c..:lm~ ,.ere appro,.ed pending the followinu amendments 1) Pertaining to the question ,'q .'.Ir Doug Wiimn being denied re~ppoimm,.nI ~y the BCC due x, a perceived profc.~siun~l ctmtSi~ t. uur d~airman would like to slate for :he record that. "Any infom~ation which Mr. \Vilson may have learned from his participation on this board is public information", 2.~ Mr Tribble would also like the minutes lo reflect that the "Proposed Plan of Action" presented a thc October 13. m~cling cmph~tized" community outreach. economic dev¢lo~men!, and ~nd-raising initiati,,es Ill BAAB has received tv.'o ap?licaIions for ff!c last vacancy on the board. We (BA.AB) will postpone voting on this ~ssue until our December rncctmg 1o give all members ~n opporluml~ lu review both resumes, and to meeI the candidae~ The lir~.t draft ofFitzgcrald Fratcr's letter t~ the f~L'£', regard,ag tis pohcy toward members in personal or professional conflict :,.'~h th,.' crun~y v,'~ adopted alter some ,'X!r Frater will folio,v-up ,x-ith co~,,cc'tiur:s, ami .,,mu :?,: Iclwr. ,n ht.u or,he hoard, for subm~ssmn lo thc BCC IX' Our discus,,ion of thc [mmokalee Recreation 4t,t Aquatic ('enter was tabled The county has responded xeO' positively ~o ou~ imltmics and concerns The cNldren who may have been Ireated unfairly ~ere reinstated Also, ~he cc',un~ has insthuted required "Div~si~y T~aming" for employee5 H.A..Xtt had cons'.dored a Ictwr of ack~im,.'led~;emen: ~o the BCC. hox~ever, that was dccmcd untm~ch ut tlU~ point V Michelle F. du, ards Asnu!d pre~ented fl~r'd~er int't~rmalion on the implement~lion of the Proposed Da,,.t~me Ordinance The board u, il: keep abreast or'ItU.,, la,,,.' as it de,,elaps to ensure thai ~o scgmcnl of ll',c populatu, m:s u~O',an I,, mt.u~ts~;urm, cd VII T'hc:c'.',axa mmorchangc:r, thc ~gcnda M~cl:elle..\ast~ndistributed her first draftofthc 16G new t3y-Laws .:,d~er some discussion. ;his m[.,c was commued until the December mect,,n~ tn allow all members adequate time to rev:e,.v gle dt,cument and off,...r suggestions VII Our discussion on Develovm.~ a .".liss~or, State,":.~.ent was also continued until December. for thc :~amc rcasona :'k. ddmona'.ly, we plan lc, address ar, y proposMs fbr sponsoring events in ~he first quarter of lgug Fhesepropo~algmus:beptesentedluthc lou~ismDevelopmentBoatdby Janua~. 1908. ~f',ve z~e to receive TD(' fimdinc t?om ~he BCC' Vlll K ann Er:.elir, h repor:cd on ~cr mcc'.m~ v..;th '[ he }[;spamc Affs~rs Ad,.4sor3, Board I len. D' Tnbblc arid Michclle Edwards Arnold '.~.,.'re al,~,, m anendance The Proposed Plan of'Action was very ~,,'dl received So, '.,.'e may look for',v~rd ~,~ ,' ~ ,.ponsonn~ events and initiatives in the future The mee',ing ..vas adjourned a~ 7 5." ttapp,: Thanksg. iving ;o ail! Minutes of lhe Black Affair~ Advisory. Board (BAAB) Special .Meeting November 26, 199'7 BA2,.B Memhen~ pre,em' Bob Bemtett Henry Tnbble Eric Baird Michelc Austin Fitzgerald Frater Ka~n English \"ivienne Johnson Niehaus Michelle £dwards Aznold Ouest' Jean Gar:scl - Secretary of the Tourist Development Council (TDC) The special me~ing '.,.'as called to order at 6'cJ5 p m to discuss submitting an v. pplication for review at the n¢.xq meeting of the Tourist Dexelopment Council in January 1998 Jean Ganscl presented the rrussion statement of the TD('. and outlined the application and rcvicw proccss for funding We learned that the Ir'DC docs not rcvicv; applications in JanuaD', but in April or October ofeach year. Applications arc acccpted 30 days prior to the council meeting Therefore, Bt%MI must seek alternate funding for any events to be held m the first quarter of 1998 (including Black lljstorv blonth) To quaJify for TDC fur, ds, we should demonstrate how we can stimulate tvunsm into Collier Count...' during the off-season - May to November Therefore, we must promote our cvc~ds outside ofthe county, and plan them in such a way as to require an ovet'm~.ht stay TI)C Funds are allocated based on the applicants' abihty ~o "pul heads in bed~" III Karin English presented further details of the initiatives which the board may choose to undertake in the near future They include: hnage development th,rough a multimedia advertising campai?n; A quarterly newsletter and a Minority/Small Business Ditcctmy There is also a proposal to host a Business and Professional Luncheon during Black thstory Month. Kann cited several guest .,peab.-~s ~,,hu may be of interest to the communib, and are available ~o attend There was a discu,~,,ion nf venuc.,~ tgr the prol'cssional luncheon and other events, a~ v, cll as funding for all the proposed initiatives It was suggested that major corporations in Collier County may be ,Mlling to support the business events by pmchasing seats a. nd.~or tables ,n advance It was recommended that we schedule our major event*, for Ih,If months of May or June (the beginning of:he oiq:sc,son) In order ~u qu~hfy fi.,, TDC fimds BAAB- Minut¢~ of the Special Meeling Continued - November 26, 199:' 165"1" Jean Gansel then r¢,,'iewed the re~t of the TDC application process, a'hich requires that applicant,,, enter into a coati,ct with Ibc county when granted 'F.DC funds Therefoze. an or,uenization seeking such grants should be an incorporated body This issue will probably have to be discussed with the count), manager, or thc Board of Cour]ty Comml.%Joners The board resolved to d:scuss' "spec:tic' "initiatives at the next rneetinlr. '.vhich can be. :m~lemented immediately such as' public service announcements and :he small b:Jsmcss <hrcctory The mcctm8 w~s adjourned shortly after 7'00 pm 16G . .EIVF_D '1997 Memorandum From: Data: Re: Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant to the BCC Michelle Edwards Arnold, Assistant to the County Administratort~F/__ December 23, 1997 Minutes of the Black Affairs Advisory Board [BAAB] Meetings My records indicate that the minutes of'the January 13, 1997 meeting was the last copy forv,'ardcd to you for the Black Affairs advisory Board [BAAB]. I have attached the meeting minutes for the months of February, March, April, May, June. September, October and November. The December minutes have not )'et been approved by the BAAB. The Black Affairs Advisory Board had no meetings scheduled during the months of July and August. The BAAB now has full membership and is looking forward to a productive new year. Thank you for )'our time. PLEASE NOTE REVISED DATE RECEIVED ,1F_C '1997 AGENDA EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES ADVISORY COUNCIL (EMSAC) DECEMBER 17, 1997 2:00 P.M. HEALTH BUILDING 3RD FLOOR 3301 EAST TAMIAMI TRAIL CALL TO ORDER APPROVAL OF MINUTES OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS Budget PLEASE NOTE: Date of meeting has been changed to WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 17 1997 at 12:00 P.M. at which t~me we have been ~nwted to jo~n the Emergency Serwces Department staff for a Christmas luncheon and our County Aclrn~n~strator. Bob Fernandez w~ll also be there Meehng Io follow luncheon. Constantine. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE ADVISORY COUNCIL (EMSAC) INFORMAL MINUTES November 24, 1997 2:00 P.M. EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES HEADQUARTERS 3301 East Tamiami Trail Council Members: Bob Laird Gary Young Sheldon Reed J.P Gunther-Mohr Fay Biles Roger Evans Mike Daws Rhona Saunders Excused Members Palma Fuson Bob Schank Others: Leo Ochs DianeB Flagg Jorge Agudera Joan Young The regular monthly meeting of the Collier County EMSAC commdtee was called to order at 200PM on Monday. November 24. 1997 by Bob Laird. Chairman Minutes from the October meeting were approved and discussion moved lo old business OLD BtJSINESS' The old business consisted of the (1) MOU ,,wth the F~re Departments and (2) Data Collection Project Jorge Aguilera gave a clear and conc~se report on the MOU's and the Fire Oepartment's Since this issue ~s mowng along in a positive direction, there ',',.as little discussion Bob Laird ask for some clarification with the Isles of Capri Fire Department and East Naples Fire ControID~strict. Leo Ochs gave a recap of tne situation and ended by saying ~t now rests with the County Manager and the Collier County Board of CountyComm~ss~oners Hopefully therew~llbeaconclus~onbym~d December Data Coilechon Project The committee was brought up to date with reference to this project by Jorge Aguilera, who ~s working very closely with our in-house person, Lt. Paul Baumgardner. to get the system on-line. Lt. Baumgardner ~s responsible for developing this Data Collection program and working very hard to have the system linked to the Revenue Services Department and on-line by mid January, 1998. This new program will greatly enhance our present ambulance billing system enabling the b~lling department to generate bills more quickly, thus creating a faster payment return w~th insurance companies and individuals. Questions and answers followed with some very positive comments from lhe committee NEW BUSINESS Dunng this meeting there was an election of officers Bob La~rd was elected for a second term as chairman with Mike Daws elected as wce chairman and Fay Biles was elected parliamentarian A short discussion followed the elections regarding the now "City" of Marco. Fay Biles brought the committee up lo date on a couple of issues One being the fact that all fire mon~es have now become "city" mon~es and were turned in to the city Ar,other concern was the provis~on of fire. sheriff, and EMS The Gordon River bridg6 construction and emergency vehicles getting thrulhe construction area ,.'vas of great concern to everyone Also, crowding at NCH and North Collier Hospital during "season" was a point of concern "Around the Room" comments: The only comment ,,','as from Leo Ochs informing the commdtee that Chief l'obin w~ll be ~-:ttend~ng the EMSAC meehngs as of January 1 as the elected President of the North Naples Fire Commission The December meet~ng w~ll be held Wednesday December 17, 1997 inconjuct~on with the EMS Christmas party which starts at 1200 P.M. The meet;rig was adjourned Respectfully Submitted. Joan Young for Barbara Brown COI.I.IER COIJNTY ENVIRONMENTAl. ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA JANUARY 7, 1998; 9:00 a.m. COMMISSION BOARDROOM~ TIIIRD FI.OOR--ADMINISTRATION BUII.DINC '2 [. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF NilNUTES - December 3, 1997 III. ADDENDA - Announcement For thc EAB member orientation on January 22, 1998 at Community Development and Environmental Services offices from 2:00 until 4:00 PM.. IV. CONSENT/ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL AGENDA V. REGULAR AGENDA Planned Unit Development Petition No. PUD-97-16 Naples Forest Country Club Section 15, Township 50 South, Range 26 East Collier Cour, ty, Florida Commercial Excavation Permit No. 59-626 Y'hovanni Otero Excavation Section 9, Township 48 South, Range 28 East Collier County, Florida Subdivision Master Plan Estates Villas of Embassy Woods Section 5, Township 50 South, Range 26 East Col!let County, Florida Planned Unit Development Petition No. PUD-97-19 Magnolia Pond PUD Section 34, Township 49 South, Range26 East Collier County, Florida Special Treatment Permit No. ST-97-2 Enclave Professional Center Section 12, Township 49 South, Range 25 East Collier County, Florida Horrts H~ncoc~ ~ ¢~ ,st.~nt.t ne_ M~c'~,~e ~.----~- - t t Environmental Advisory Board Agenda ...................................... January 7, 1998 Page 2 - VI. OI.D BUSINESS VII. NEW BUShNESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT IX. WORKSHOP NOTES: [Board Membersl: Notify the PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (403- 2400) no later than 5 P.M. on JanuaO, 2, 1997, ifyou cannot attend this meeting or if you have conflict and thus will abstain from voting on a particular petition. [General Public[: Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto; and therefore may need to insure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. MINUTES OF TIlE ENVIRONMENTAl. ADVISORY BOARD DATE: TIME: PLACE: December 3, 1997 9:00 a.m. 3R' Floor Boardroom, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, Naples, Florida EAB STAFF PRESENT Dejong Excused Absence Espinar _X Foley X Hermanson X Hill X Hinchcliff X Saadch Excused Absence Chrzanowski X I.enberger _X MINUTES BY: Stephen Lenberger, Environmental Specialist II CALLED TO ORDER AT: 9:04 a.m. ADJOURNED AT: 9:43 a.m. PRESIDIN(';: Paul Hinchclif£ Chairman ADDENDA TO TIlE AGENDA: APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion made by Mr. Foley, seconded by Mr. Espinar and carried 5/0, to approve minutes of November 5, 1!}97. ITEM: V.A PETITION NO: Site Development Plan No. SDP-97-123 Naples Memorial Gardens WITtIDRAWN Environmental Advisory Board Minutes ....................................... December 3, 1997 Page 2 ITEM: V.B PETITION NO: Ptanncd Unit Development Petition No. PUD-97-16 Naples Forest Country Club WITHDRAWN ITEM: V.C PETITION NO: Planned Unit Development Petition No. PUD-97-18 · ~ I~.gms Pass Landings PUD REQUESTING: Wiggins Pass Landings is an 88.55 acre multi-family residential project with recreational facilities, board walks / wharf, stormwater management retention system and preserve area. REPRESENTED BY: Todd Tun'ell, Turrell & Associates, Inc. Karen Bishop, PMS, Inc. of Naples .5lOTION: Made by Mr. Hermanson, seconded by Mr. Foley and carried 4/i, to approve Planned Unit Development Petition No. PUD-97-18 added stipulation: Water Management: I. Applicant will need lo obtain a Surface Water Management Permit from the SFWMD prior to site development plan approval. Environmental: I. Label the mangrove and wetland areas as preser~,c areas on the PUD master plan. Amend Section 2.12 of the PUD document to read as follows by adding the underlined lan~uaee and deleting the ..... t. thro'agh ~ ......... gu~suant to Section fi. 1O.A of thio PUD, Twenty Five Percent (25%) of the viable naturally functioning native vegetation on site shall be preserved. Environmental Advisory Board Minutes ....................................... December 3. 1997 Page 3 Amend Section 4.3 (D) of the PUD document to read as follov.'s by adding the underlined language and deleting the ..... t, ,~ ...... ~- !an~uzgo. Drainage. water management structures, and utilities, ut/lit.an-an 9a',:ili,,h2& subject to all needed permits. .&mend Section 4.4 CA) of thc PUD document to read as follows by adding the underlined lan~uaee and dcletine thc ..... t. ,~. ...... ~. 1 .......... Principal structures shall be setback a minimum of ten fcct (10') from Recreational. and Open Space ~-J Pr~erve Dist,'act boundaries and private roads, and ten feet (10'l from all PUD boundaries and residential tracts. Principal structures shall be setback a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet from Preserve District boundaries. R. cplacc Section 5.!0 (B) ofthe PUD document with the following stipulation. All conservation areas shall be designated as conservation/preservation tracts or easements on all construction plans and shall be recorded on the plat with protective covenants per or similar to Section 704.06 of the Florida Statutes. Buffers and setbacks shall be in accordance with 3.2.8.4.7.3 CCLDC. Amend Section 5,10 (C) of the PUD document to read as follows by adding the underlined language and deleting the ..... I' ,~ ..... g~- ~ .......... Buffers around preserved jurisdictional wetlands shall be in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental Resource Permit Rules. Preserved jurisdictional wetlands and surrounding buffers shall be incorporated in Conservation Areas which shall be platted, c~,~,~v .... ;' ~' ............. ~ ~'" D~pam.m. en: of ..................................... ~ ................................... Ccunty Land Development Codo. Add the following stipulations to the PUD document. in the event the project does not require platting, all conservation areas shall be recorded as conservation/preservation tracts or casements dedicated to an approved entity or to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance and subject to the uses and limitations similar to or as per Florida Statutes Section 704.06. 16G 1 Environmental Advisory Board Minutes ....................................... December 3, 1997 Page 4 A Gopher Tortoise sun'ey and relocation/management plan shall be submitted to Current Planning environmental staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. A copy of the relocation/management plan shall be included on the final site plans/construction plans. Minor variations in the development plan as it affects wetland areas will be permitted to allow for prcscn'ation oFadditional xeric scrub upland habitat, subject to environmental permitting agency approval. COMMENTS: For a complete record of the proceedings reader is directed to the tape recording of this meeting, located in the Office oFthe Clerk to the Board, 5'h Floor, Building "F", Collier County, Government Complex. There being no further business, thc meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair. Environmental Advisory Board Paul Hinchcliff. Chairman 5,11n h: E.&B Forms Go[den Gate Beautification Advisory committee Minutes - Meeting of November 12, 1997 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS AND MOTIONS: Minutes to the meeting of October 14, 1997: Bonner Bacon moved to accept the minutes as submitted; seconded by Sabina Musci and carried unanimously. 5. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S REPORT Mike McGee suggested planting red and white begonias before the holidays. Mike reported no major problems; he recommended removing a sabal palm in median 13; he cautioned Chuck to stay on top of the irrigation due to the dry conditions. He also requested that aliquid fertilization be applied this month. 6. TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Since the committee was in favor of taking over the maintenance of the interior roadways, there was further discussion regarding the budget. Bonner Bacon recommended using the remainder of the year as a pilot program. Bonner made a motion authorizing additional services through September, 1998 as proposed by Commercial Land Maintenance, Inc., 192,168.93 per service/S39,040.65 for 18 services per year) with flexibility to allow for trash removal since the figures provided are speculative; seconded by Sabina Musci and carried unanimously. The area includes a section that is outside the MSTU, i.e., Golden Gate Parkway from Santa Barbara to I 75 passover. Mike recommended extending the boundaries to Route 75, not extending the taxing district. 7. NEW BLISINESS Norris Hancock Constantine Mac'Kle ~errF A. Mike McGee presented a set of blueprints for the proposed improvements of the south portion of C.R. 951, referred to as Part A, Phase I and Phase II, dated April, 1997. After discussion and review, Sabina Musci motioned to approve the landscape plans as presented and requested they be forwarded to county staff for construction purposes; seconded by Chuck McMahon and carried unanimously. Gate Beautification Arlvtsory ,4~je~t~ln - Dece,tber 9, 1997 ¢ommtttee 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 8. 9. 10. Meeting calle(] to order Roll Call Approval of Minutes - Meeting of November 12, 1997 Landscape ,',,laintenance Report - Chuck Buckley LandSCal)e ,.\rch~t~,~ I's R~,porl - ,Mike McGee Jransportation Administration Services Report A. Steve Fabiano B. Val Prince Committee Members' Reports Old Business New Business Public Comments -kdjournment Next Meeting: January 13, 1998, 4:00 p.m. @ Golden Gate Community Center Go[/[ell Gate Beautification Advisory Minutes - Meeting of November 12, 1997 16G ¢omtntttee Meeting called to order at 4:08 p.m. at the Golden Gate Community Center. Roll Call - Present: Cheryle Newman, Bonner Bacon, Charles McMahon, Sabina Musci, members; Steve Fabiano, Val Prince (5:30), Transportation Administrative Services; Mike McGee, McGee & Associates; Jacqueline Silano, secretary; Chuck Buckley, Commercial Land Maintenance. Excused Absence: Mark Houghton. Minutes to the meeting of Octobei 14, 1997: Bonner Bacon moved to accept the minutes as submitted; seconded by Sabina Musci and carried unanimously. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT Chuck Buckley reported that the new trees have been staked and have had additional waterings; the trees, turf and ornamental plants have been sprayed for ~nsects and fungus and fertilizer has been applied. Bo E.B. Simmonds has checked pump 3 and the voltage regulator has been adjusted. It appears a heavy truck has damaged some sprinklers in median /I1; Iow water pressure in medians 9 and 10 was apparently the result of a malfunctioning diaphragm which was replaced along with the base and valve components. Chuck provided copies of the Estimated Costs for Limited Servicing of Additional Medians Within Golden GateMSTU Boundary. An estimated 747,906 square feet would cost approximately $39,040.65 which includes mowing and edging of all curbed areas, trash removal in n~edians, and spaying of herbicide on ali medial concrete areas. It does not include street sweeping, fertilizer application, tree/plant pruning or watering. A lengthy discussion ensued. Since these medians are currently being maintained by the County, Steve Fabiano will check with Mr. Bobanick to obtain the cost figures. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S REPORT Ao Mike McGee suggested planting red and white begonias before the holidays. Mike reported no major problems' he recommended removing a sabal palm in median 13' he cautioned Chuck to stay on top of the irrigation - ' 1 due to the dry conditions. He also requested that aliquid fertilization be applied this month. TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES Copies of the Budget Status through October, 1997 were distributed and reviewed. Since the committee was in favor of taking over the maintenance of the interior roadways, there was further discussion regarding the budget. Bonner Bacon recommended using the remainder of the year as a pilot program. Bonnermade a motion authorizing additional services through September, 1998 as proposed by Commercial Land Maintenance, Inc., (,$2,168.93 per service/S39,040.65 for 18 services per year) with flexibility to allow for trash removal since the figures provided are speculative; seconded by Sabina Musci and carried unanimously. The area includes a section that is outside the MSTU, i.e., Golden Gate Parkway from Santa Barbara to I 75 passover. Mike recommended extending the boundaries to Route 75, not extending the taxing district. Steve Fabiano will try to utilize the county landscape crew to do an initial cleanup before the holidays. Chuck Buckle,/ will have the sod cut so that E.B. Simmonds can move the sign lights at C.R. 951. Steve distributed copies of an Executive Summary which was drafted by Val Prince which requests approval of the 50/50 funding. A discussion ensued. The document will be revised by Val Prince, Mike McGee and Steve Fabiano for further review at next month's meeting. In order to expedite it, a special meeting will be called if necessary. When final revisions are made, it will be presented to Commissioner Constantine for review and submission as an agenda item. 7. NEW BUSINESS AD Mike McGee presented a set of blueprints for the proposed improvements of the south portion of C.R. 951, referred to as Part A, Phase I and Phase II, dated April, 1997. After discussion and review, Sabina Musc; motioned to approve the landscape plans as presented and requested they be forwarded to county staff for construction purposes; seconded by Chuck McMahon and carried unanimously. As there was no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 5:45 p.m. The next meeting will be held at 4:00 p.m. on Tuesday, December 9, 1997 at the Golden Gate Community Center. 51F,M lll':ILq I'RESENT: STAFF PP. ESENT: COUNTY I.IAISON: ABSENT: COI.LIER COUNTY IIEALTI! DEPARTMENT ADVISORY BOARD ,Meeting Minutes - December l, 1997 Dr. l)enisellcincm;tnn, Mar)' l,ee MontRomery, A n n ( 'a m p h ell Tom ¢)lliff Charles Rlmades, .lim l~enzcykowski, Pat Meyers Dr. Charles Konigsberg, Roger Evans, Susan Craig and Marry Kniehes Li' '~ / The meeting was called to order at 4:20 PM I)y l)r, lleinemann, chair. members present for a quorum. There were not enough New Board .Member: l)r. tleinemann asked Tom about the "advertised board member position". No applications ',','ere received except one from a seasonal person. This vacancv is being re-advertised again. Any new applications will be sent to the board with voting ballots, etc. Future .Meetings: There was a discussion about futuremeetin~s. It was agreed hv those present that the 3rdMonday ofeach quarter would he scheduled. The dates :ire: Feb. 16, Mav 18, August 17 and November 16. Other meetings ,,','ill be arran~ctl if needed. Prinulrv Care Challenge (;rant: l)r. Konigsher~ informed the hoard that the Prinmry Care ChMlenge (;rant applicalion did no! receiveapprovM, tie stated that he was going to call Lee Ann Roberts at the state level and try. to find out what the problem was with the application. Were demographics of county or demographics of people served one of the reasons why the application was not approved? llow much did polilics play in lhis? Il was suggested lo look at other grants to compare. Collier County Public Schonls: The (';oilier County Public Schools are having problems with tile indoor air quality at Eas! Naples Middle School. Tllt. lleallh Department was approved to work,,,,ilh the schoolsto help themv,-ith their problem. A consultant has heen called in bv the schools. Roo~erlnman from Tallahassee and Mark Crowlev of the tlealth l)ep:lrlmenl h:,vebeen incollahoration,,vilh the schools. Asurveyis being done with results expected some time in .hlnuar'v. Next Meeting: Set for Monday, February (Administration boardroom). 16th at 4:00 PM. It will be held at Building 1t, room 202 Norris - Hancock a/ Constant Ine '._ ~.~c'K le v 16g 1 The meeting adjourned at 4:50 PM. Respectfully Submilted By Marry Kniebes. Recording Secreta0' ' iii; COLLIER (.iO.MM U.~:I'I'Y [)t.Y,.'[.ilJ )P.M EXT AX[) December 16.1997 COUXTY GO\ RNMENT 16G RFC _F_!VED '2SO(,, NUI(Ttl t lOt',SI-LSiIfH-i Dt-IIVE .N'.-\ t'l,l.Lq, l-'[,(),riI D.\ Lis. Christina F4.'gcrs CLG Coordinator Bureau of I listoric l'rcscrvation R.A. Gray Building 500 South P, ronough Street Tallahassce. Florida 32399-0250 RE: Collier County Prcscrvation Board Meeting Dear Ms. Eggers: This letter is to inform you that tile (._'oilier Count.,.' Historic and Archaeological Preservation Board held a public hc;,rin,, on Thursday. l)cccmbcr 11 1997. I have enclosed a copy of the minutes tYr vour review and records. I have also attached a copy of th,: current membership list fi~r the Collier County Historic and Archaeological Preservatim~ Board. If you have arLv questions or concerns regarding this meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me at: 941-403-2463. Very truly yours. Principal Planner (CL(3 Coordinator) l lislnric fret, er,. alton R Vll.rh cc:Vincenl,.\ ('aulcro Sue I-'fi son Ron lamro Rnhcn Mulhcrc Nan,.:.', Sicmion Preset'. ation Board ";l '911 .",';, I u r'a ] I'h,nnin,.' .~ .r":c., f~:C..EIV ED~ j;:. 7, .-,:,,? COI.I.IER COUNTY IlISTORICAI./ARCIIAEOLOGICAI, PRESERVATION BOARD Ms. l)hmc M. Gonzalc× Brcnnan Building, Suite 745 - 12:h Avenue South Naples, Florida 34102 (t.aw) PllONE NO. 649-0088 FAX: 649-1980 Janice McBride Ward McWard Archilccts, Inc. 1207 Third Street South, Suite Naples, Florida 34102 (Architecture - AD-t lOC) PHONE NO. 263-7000 16G 1 Mr. David J. Driapsa 725 - 103~d Avenue Naples, Florida 341 OS (Landscape Architect) PtlONE NO. 591-2321 Thomas Franchino Franchino & Rav,'son, P.A. 1250 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 302 Naples, Florida 34102 (Real Estate/Land Development) PHONE NO. 263-8357 John W. Thompson 576 Retreat Drive, Apt. 202 Naples, Florida 34110 (Archaeology) PIIONENO. 597-2269 Mrs. l_,ora Jean Young 1268 N. Collier Boulevard Marco Island, Florida 34145 (At Large - Ci~ainnan) PttONE NO. 642-5925 Ms. Laura Rupp Burke 161 V',.'cst Avenue Naples, Florida 34108 (HistoD') PHONE NO. 5t4-4331 Ms. Deborah Jones Cox 325 Bay Forest Drive Naples, Florida 34110 (At Large) PHONE NO. 598-4277 Lis. Christina Eggcrs Bureau of Historic Preservation R.A. Gray Building 500 South Bronough Street Tallahassce, Florida 32399-0250 (CLG Coordinator) PHONE NO. 904-487-2333 MaD' Ellcn Rand Wilson, Miller, Barton & Peck. Inc. 3200 Bailey Lane, Suite 200 Naples, Florida 34105 (Volunteer) PHONE NO. 649-4040 HISTORICAL LIST RB,md COLLIER COL;NTT GOVERNMENT C()*I.',IL'NITY I)EVEI,OPMENT ..\NI) ENVI RONMENT..\L .S ER~,' It ' ?.S'" DIVISI()N December 29. 1997 16G 2,~00 N()RT[I II()RSESII()E I)RIVE NAI'I,E.q. FI.()RIDA :14104 Ms. Christina Eggers CLG Coordinator Bureau of ! tistoric Preservation R.A. (;ray Bt, ilding S00 South Bronough Street Tallahassee. Florida 32399-0250 RE: Collier Count',' Presen'ation Board Meeting Dear Ms. Eggcrs: This letter is to intbrm you that the Collier County Ilistoric and Archaeological Preservation P, oard will hold a public hearing on Friday. January. 16, 1998. I have enclosed a cop.,,' of the agenda lbr .','our review and records. If you have any questions or concerns regarding this meeting, please do not hesitate to contact me at: 941-403-2463. Very truly yours. 1 Ray Bellows Principal Planner (CLG Coordinator) I listorlc Prcscrvatmn/RVl~,/rb cc: Vincent ..\ [',Julcro Sue Filmn Ron Jamm Robcrl Mulhcrc N anc.~ 5icmlon I'rcscr'. alltm ltoard Building Rev:ew & Permitting Code Enfi~reement }t-usint~ & Urban Improvement 941) 403-2.100 ,9,1 l ) 40:1-2.1.I0 941 } 40:1-2:1:10 Natural [{esourct, s Planmn~: Services lhfllt, tion ~ 9.11 } 7:12-2.503 · 1 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY t{iSTORICAL/ARC}~EOLOGICAL PRESERVATION BOARD WILL MEET AT 9:00 A.M., FRIDAY, JANUARY 16, 1998, IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DiVISION/Collier COUNTY GOVERNMENT, 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, MEETING ROOM "E" NAPLES FLORIDA: NOTE: ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WiLL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE r~AY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS ~dDE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY ~D EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE RASED. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE HAPB WILL BECOME A PEPdV~NENT PART OF THE RECORD. THESE MATERIALS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF CObTgTY COMMISSIONERS. 1. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 11, 1997 3. PLYING SERVICES DEPARTMENT REPORT: A. Archaeological Training For County Staff OLD BUSINESS: Historic Designation of the Morris Property Archaeological Site B. H. Nehrling's Tropical Gardens and Arboretum Captain Horr's House National Register Ceremony on January 17, 1998 5. NEW BUSINESS: A. Workshop information Role and Responsibilities of The Collier County Preservation Board. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA ADJOURN HISTORICAL AGE~;DA/md ~orrt$ Hancock Constantine ~ac'Kle Be~r~ [~{isc. Cortes: Date: ~ ~; .-~ Item# , *. Copies To: ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE RESCUE DISTRICT ..,~nutes of Advisory [!oa-4 .V. eotin9 July lO, 1.097 Advisory .r!oard :.'.embers Present: 16G ! Also ;'resent: Pschigoda, .~'schJqoda, qunninqham, Arroyo,!~:tir~r, .Mike, Ohlis. Also ,Jeff Page. Meetinq called to orr!or 1~;05... Chief's Report of ,Junes incidents. ::r. J!uoqel bou.'lht tape recorder for Advisory f{onrd. i'urper bnck. Contract for pumper was signed ky >',r. :;t~rrir: in August, 1995. imF~ct study - draft created as of June 18th.. Popovici made motion to delay vote until ~lrown and !iur:qel :.far inaro secon:t. Cost of truck to be repaired :,'as P~400.00. :-fembers wanLed to see invoi, ces for parts. Advisory Board Page brought draft to the board braking down the dif- ferent departments. Woolsey ask to wait until Prown ancl Hueqel get back to discuss. District 1 - 1~,5 proposal. Capri to receive 32,2~0.00 if 269,000.00 is there. Do we want 5 }'ear contract? Wait until !3ro;.;n and ~{uege! get back. Popovici motioned to study d{-aft before making a decision on the l~'i.draft. Popovici will have his attorney took at this draft. Verify chain of command. :;ecessary to :]mend budget, mono}' out of reserve from District ] , not out of I.C.F.D. district. Popovici motioned to adjourn, 2arinaro second. Meeting adjourned at 19:15... C.C. Advisory Board >:embers Diane Flagg Norris Hancock Constant Sne Mac 'K 'l e Berry ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE &4 RESCUE DISTR/CT :finutes of Advisory Board Heetlng August 7, i997 Advisory Board Members Present: I.:oolsoy, ?opn:.'ici, Marinate, Drown, }[uegel Alsc Present: Pschiqoda, Pschigoda, Butler, ©hlis, ~'adi!la, Arroyo, Floyd, Eaten, Jeff Page ;. Med-Com 7 Meeting calle~ to order 18:05... Advisory Board unhappy with management and leadership of ~dm~atrat~on. 1. 2 years ago we fought to get this department as a vQ]unteer parttime paid department. The mono}' isnt qoinq to the volunteers. 2. A review of the budget indicates an alarming rate of over- time and m orlies that have gone directly to o11r Chief. Is there an issue there with regard to labor laws? 3. Chief is working for someone else and not the Isles of Capri Fire Department. ,1. Present Chief doesnt think I.C.F.District Board }]as any say. 5. Serious qoncern with the on going management of finances at the station, handling personnel, contract negotiations and simple good neighbor relations on a professional basis and on mutual aid with our neighboring departments. 6. Our buQget being over by $20,000.00. Our Advisory Board, is suppose to prepare the budget, everyt~tbe we make a budget; someone changes it. Our Advisory Board works for the tax payers of Isles of Capri. Our ordiance calls for certain pro- coddles. If its been changed, which it looks like it }]as been changed, no one on Isles of Capri has been notified as to the change and why. You cunt just change an ordiance withou[' advertising and it being done in a certain way. The State of Florida calls for a board like ours and you have to be a resident. 7. Contract with East Naples Fire Department on our present firetruck. Board had an agreement maintenance contract. It is the duty of the management person to insure that all the articles and ameuments are there that ben~fit this station. ?hat had not been done until after the fact. Cost, over $6,000.00. This is a very serious issue. 8. The Advisory Board is responsible for the Isles of Capri Fire Department budget, We also need to require that the man- agement of the station has a close eye on how ~ncome and expenditure OCCU r. · : 166 1 9. This fire district is a municipal ta×inq di.-~Lrict. Tho ta×es, ale paid by the people in this fire district, not E.N..$. 10. Chief paying $l,7I)F).O0 [or hydrant withe,It c.~minq to the board. il. Accordinq to the bud¢;et, $7R,7O0.00 ('%,I.2 ~,) ir; al loLted for 2 firemen. ;';hat dr)or; that lo;lye For oq,:ipmonh, f,~r vol- unteers, maintenance? Its out of the picture. We ,.4~L'e sup- pose to be a parttime paid votuntr~r~r dnpartmr,nt. 12. Meeting between County M,]na,trtr a:.:! !':,:l.:;., :;tation Lc) be run in a different direction than it ~% be~nq r~n now. E.M.3. was told to leave fire departments; alone, does that mean only indopenr]erlt dopartment~ ~r all Fifo departments? 13. An alarming iss,le of animonity betwenn l.C.F.b, anti ENFD and MIFD. ;':e have to have a qood ;..'orking prefessional re- lation~hi.p in the area of mut,~a] aid. >:hen Marco Island had a dwelling on ~iro, and we wern ~tandinq ready to provide a';~;~ Zt;~r, CC' , Wr- Wr~rr~ Lhr~ ~ ,~r;h L'~ Lr' ",~ ] ] "~i . ;'I};? i r; t~';]t t. he CaS~? 14. ~ecome a Volunteer Parttime Paid independent Fire Dis- trict. Alarming number of volunteers have left the department. :6. Can the n~;mber of volunteer.--; be brouql~t back ,)p? 17. Can re.lationship with other st<]tions be repaired? 13. Consolidate volunteers from different departments. 19. I,ettering on boat and trucks rrhar~qed without tho board k2owin9 anything about it until the? read about it in the 29. l,etter going to Co,~nty Commissioners and County Manaqer r,3~ardin~ "Change in >',anaqement" i{ue[~el proposed for '.'ii i!inm Pschi,~c,,da to take over as a Volunteer Chief. This hoard was created to advise tho Comnissioners. If it had keen changed, where and how was it changed? 21. All 5 board members agreed on this :Change in >lan- a'.Jemen t." 22. Impact fees started in !995, nothing back yet. 23. District i funding, 12.10% ($31,000.O0). 2,I. 2-200 motors for Boat 90 from goat [!aven for free. 25. Chief never ordered 2 board member shirts by request of ;:r. i[ueqel. 26. Change window's in the bedroom of Station 90 to meet fire code. Board pas~e., on Chief s .Report. Heeting Ended 19:30... C.C. Diane Flagg Advisory Board Hembers ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE RESCUE DISTRICT :-;r)ptol:l}~(,.r I 1 , 1997 Board }iembers Present: Woolsey, Popov tiuege l ?:,,:hiqoda, Pnchi,:,o~l.n, ©hl is, Butler Also Pr,,~ent: Jeff pano Dian~, r"lagq :.',e~,;in},' calle,i to or,i~r 18:1.0... Ch-~ir:':~n t';',~l::e',' o:mne'] A,lvizory Roard XeeEi::':. i. :-l;.:T Certification. 2. RoaL acciSer~t not being reported - :/elo;:y if. .-,',',.r ';00.00 4ol].ar~ with o[ damage. . ..~..unaad ,;:h. akerl ofr ., ~ the z~Jan.'i a .:tight 4. Part-t/me Pat4 Volunteer P~part:n~,nt. Atilt ~]eg towards volunteerz. .... .,arc_ I~ nfl Fi Depar:z;nont Rast ;:anles Fire Department. 7. ,,',tti tu':es towards Advisory Board. 8. (]}5d fireman not a food administrator. }. P,car-] :~roi)osos to briart in Assistant Ch[e[ as a '.'el unroof Chief. r, ur station. 11.. It: to':,k ov,.r 2 },ears to get rir~. ,~n'] :,r',ok,' . ur station.Win~lows also. ' ' ~ by . . . 12. Boac tar: n over EMS r,]o one ad'sisod us f !3. Comr~and truck taken over. 14. itow can w,- take o'/er CoocJlan. ? ] q L., .~rr, St;n;',Osc. tO so~ the hudl~t , 'Fiji:; '/ear w~ w,)r~ not evert invited. I;l . '.':e have mortgage on our stat ion. ?;HOt jr:st p~lt ~r, ~00 O0 into ENFD 17. :~hirt: for two Arlvisory lkJarr] ;.l~::her::;. Ne'/or ~,~til_c~n. Ci]airman ;';.:cir. .... a.sv,-,d Chi, of who ~.]se war; [n','olvr,,i in hont-.inq acci4e;:'. Chief anz',,'ered it '.,,as him and 2 firefi,Thters and a ;.]arino Pa ~r,cl P, cat. Chair:r~a:t ;'/o?l:;ey asked 'l£fice Steve A[r::<and,>r .of the Patrol if ',~ knew the federal laws, i~ he wa:: ...n appraiser, h,? i~as ~he riqht to ,,:srk hfs own acci,lent. if 2 or more neet)lc know about this acci4ent i~nt it a con spiracy in not r~ort, tng the accident? iiueqeL't- > Chie£, <lone. ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE Cd RESCUE DISTRICT :.linute:: of Advi:;or',; .r~<)ard ~>~,.tir;q 16G Advisory Board :-iember:-: [)resent: t';oolso;.', .:,oF~,.-ici , Xarinnro, }"~ r ow n, [{iI¢2r:lr: i Also Present: ?odri~u~;z, Pschigoda, Nutler .also Present: Xeeting called to r>r.'ter If{tO()... I . C]~ir.f':: rrtpr,r!. ¢,f incidr,nt..'-~ Fret' Sr'[:tr.mlfr'r. being donated for a 1)t~rn ;.;i'.!l tilt, (ti t.}., t.:arr'r~ East Y/ar)los and l~].e~ of Cn,'.ri on k~r,r,Way,ir,n 3 bi~'.. .~ for doinq, pUh'lp repair:; on Chairman Woolsey made a report on the ]otter ho wrr~tc, County :,'.anager as pr~r request from last mot:tbs mo,~Linq. }]and delivered the letter to }]Js office. Chairman an appointment but was told thc County Hanaqer wot:ltl xt,~dv tho letter and reply }~ac~:. Chairman Woolsey: Re: fire protection in Goodland.There was n sugqestion that they should go with SaFco Island. It occurred to me we invited Marco Island ;]nd East :J.~plr, s 2 }'ears a{lo toma,,e'- us offer s in our behalf. I re-approached East Xaples to see if they could clix'r' us assistance. I approac:hc, d t}:e Chairman of thr, ir Fire [~oard and he called ~n the Chief and wo discussed this in dot:ail. They are interested in qiv~n-: ,:s fife servic~ and usinq our millage rate. Tho>' had a cop}' cf our budget. ibis contract '.,'o,]ld have. to '1:o made ;'it'n t;~; Col lief County [~,oard nf Commi ssicners. i contacted Commissioner .Jcl]n ::orris, n~.:hed for ;~oint:nent and ;..'as tel:-] to ]to in l~ir~ nffi(:o in ~r) min~t~,s. discussed a ;:roposa] ':h~t [ would like ynu to rt.,ad and study anti if i get a second I will make this in a form of a motion that ~'e follow this path. This is a proposal to the County Commissioners to contract us with East Naples. i'am going to open the floor for discussion. Board Member Popovici: Based on this document which appears to i:e directed to tho Commissioners we are asl:ing that East >:a.Dles Fire Department contract wit]] the ~oard of County Commissioners to provide fire protection service here cn the isles of Capri. 17~ CAP?.I BOI:I.IEN'A, RD · '.¢' F~ fJ,[ r*~%PPl · ~:APIE.¢. F,()R,,.., a~'~.2 · i~.l~l q'~f 2~"* Page 2 Chairman Woolsey: 1'his is correct. .qoard Member Popovici: It says for a period o£ one year with an optiona! ann,itl Chairman :';aa]seMi That's the term of the contract. 'Thi:-; contract is for onn vt, ar. ;t~ an optional choice which wo,~l : r,.qui r~, I.l~r~ Co,:t~l.}' Commissioners and East Xaples to continue it. P, oard >:ember Popovici: ;';ot:ld tJlat )se dr);~o at our ,-~lrrr,:~t. mi !l;',qe rat. r~' Ir,vol'.' Board Hember Huegoi: It says here that it :,'et:id st',ny ti:at wa}' for at lr~a:;t, ,'~ yea r . Board :.:emi)er Po.r)ovic:i: a mi:~imum of a year at our mi 1 iago rate, and then basr, d r~;~ t~w they would provide service, would determine the annual renewal. C!lai rman 'That's correct. }f we (:omplafn and don't l to the Co~:nty Commissioners and ask ti:om to contr.[ tho contract. Whatever contracts are made I)y and for this station are dc)no by tho Ceunty Commissio;~,~rs. They are the overall They have delegated certain administrational thing.~ over to the Count}' AdmihisLrator and he is sub deloqatod and delegated (]own tho Line. Fundamentally the County Commir~s~oners control the h~:yinq and soiling of property and ~,vorthinq in this station. Nothing happens without t}:~3ir OK. Board >[ember Popovic[: With regard to the contract to buy tho vehicle, the pumper truck, which the pump went bad and based on the agreement bet.- ween our fire I)oard and tko East Naplr~:~ Fire Roard thht.crrtnfn co~ttingencie~ and provisions would Ilo i~cluded. C!:-] i rman Woolsey: it was a verbe! aqroement that no,'or q.'r~ft into the siqnr, d documon t. Board :.',,?tuber Popovici: The question I have is this, if there is any diversions from an}' of the stipulations here before any contract is signed, do we have tire abilit}' to review Jr? Weaning what we are asking, especially ~3 is very important, ihat the tax revenues used by East :faf)les be maintained by Isles of Capri District using our current millage rate. Chairman Woolsey: am sure the Count}' Commissioners will give us a chance to review ,the contract. Page 3 Board :.~ember Harinaro: Well they haven't in the .r)ant, richt? 16G 1 l;oard H(?mber lluogel: No, it has not been the Count}'. Board Member Harinaro: I;ut tire County ]]as gone and done the budget. hnow if we do something ii]Jo this. }!ow do wo i think it would have to come to a voting referend,~m from all the constituents. Chairman ?;c)olr4,,y: ::ot the contract. t;oard Y,r:ml)c,r I}ueg~;1: ~:Ot or. %!:e cor:'.r::ct . W,'., d]:-;c,~:~:-:,'d :.}~,~t a }'ear ago. ';hat's the same ti:ing with Goodland. [ t doosn ' t take. n vote ,Jeff Page: ]'!]ere are a lot of things to consider. off this ];uildin~. ]'o',ir sti 11 payinq Chairman Woolsey: its already included in our budget and any payments will be made from our budcjet to satisfy debt and to .DrovideEast Nap]os with whatever fund? they need to service this .'~tation, Board >:ember Huego] : Basically they would take the funds that we have coming into us as income, thnt'.q tnxe:;. '['hey would take that and t!]is .rirel~ouse under th,it budget seperately from their own. Chairman ;';::ol sey: '?he bud.set no longer applies. A lot of the expenses nnd so cn ti]at are included in that no longer apply. They will come in ;.::d oi)erate this station. They will furnish,~ the man})ower. '?hey '..:ant volunteers. ]'hey want this board to stay intack. They want represenLation. Xow its discussat;lo that down the road there might bo a merger of East Xaples and isles of Capri. It doesn't make bad sense. Their millage rate is :3 mill higher than ours. They want to come out here for n yea~ and show us what they can do for us. They have the manpower to do it. They have volunteers too. Board Heml:er Harinaro: As an Advisory Board is this all ti~at :;e want. These 4 things. I think its important that we have a say in this contract. Who writes the contract? Chairman Woolsey: It will probably bt: a rough draft of it by East Board Member ~luegel: P~e£ore ,de ratify tilt, contract can we ,qor2 tile contract and a'gree to it? i'age: You won' t be the on~, r;iqni~,q it. Commissioner s. I I. ;!i l! I)e thr.~ County Board Xember Popo'.'Jci : ? under:<t;ar~d ill,:7 have final authoritT. Board Xember l{ueqel: If we recommend thi:-; and thr~ Count, 7 Commi it then t}~ey wi ] ] rl,.qol, j,,t~, wi Jeff Page: Yes, Lhre;.' t!',eir attorneT. P, card >:ember XarJr:aro: >;}]jr:}l Commi:-;sioner :;orris fell; positive about is what }'our C}~aJ rm4n ;';eli, a]riqht t),at':¢ ,'-,notl~r,r r)r, int. In my ,,r,r,l. ing :.ir. :;orrJ:¢ l. hese Co:nm[ssioners don't like to advise people what to do, b~:t they indicate what, ,,lot:ltl 13,' in Lhoi r r)yor.; ,t qn~}d id,,a ~u:;'. ,,s L~;e7 d~d wit. t~ Good,and..As quoEod ~n ElF) paper. ()ne of the sfe;>s you could take would be to contract with :.;arco which appareatly according to reports i hear from the fire department plans are to 'keep op~,ratinq as Chief r).~z}~r 2ayx hr~ :..'a:; tieing to continue serving Coodland until z:;t]r-}~ l, im~, a~; ho :.'a~ directed nee he. So their not without service down there. As stated in tho contract this arrangement i:; only for the period of one year. If we are not happy with it ils our op-- t~on to Ei5continue it. If Rarer Naples is ~]nha[)[)y with it they csn disco:]tinue it. it's our option to recommend to the Board. Jeff Page: ':hat'% accor ]lng Lo the lease or tho contract agreement. d,2:')end2 on vour wording. Board F!erF-er Popovici: As I see it if w,; ha\,'e a full time paid station with man.- power and the abilit7 to provide service here. Chairman Woolsey: They are not promising a full manpowered [)aid station. T}~ey are still going to utilize volunteers as well as paid personnel, f{e mentioned 2 or 3 regular full time paid and another thing that he suggested and I"am being very carful in my wording here, that they would like to do is to operate this facility and the one .Jp the street at ,'4anatee as a unit. Two campuses of the same unit. You can recognize the r-,avinqs in.- :,olved b}' doing it that way, l,/n are rea!Iv ,at onr, o;~(; and are at the other end and everybody that counts is in tho middle. I just went to Hainsai ] and was amazr~d at hmw ma;~}' r'r)rldo:: ,~r'o over there now, and its going to continue. Ffddlnr~ ~r~r,k i~ cominq into pi. ace. Fiddler's; Cr~,~,k [:; divid~)d }:r~Lw(~c,r~ l;:a:;t N,~ples present this as a motion. P, oard Homber !tuege] : j ~r,¢:ond thin mot. i~t). ~oarr] :.',emi:er Harinaro: i wonder if we should get some leqal consul? ?,oard >:ember }tuegei: ?,,1l '~;e are doing is r(:commendin3 that r),,r fire department be cov~red, i would qo along with the one year contract. we want to do. i would think thir; would be tho mo~:t Chairman Woolsey: .:::; ti:is ::ropo::;al i:~ written up it cou]d continue forever as ]or,-; a~ kcth parties wanted to l:oep the r:nn'.~racL qoinq I il:r, that. [ t};it:~: that'~ a good stipulation to ha'.'c, in there. Boarci :.;ember !fue.uel: [ think its a matter of negotiatinq with Chairman Woolsey: That's it. The/ insisted that the proposal include thr' continuation. ,Jeff !'age: You w~:uld have to .,')ut this out for bid. OK East ::~,.- les will get it. You just can't say Chairman Woolsey: I disagree with }'ou. The County Commissioner'4 (:an dr~ any thing the?' want to. it's not a bidable prol:iem. This is a state authorized ta:,:ir:q dfrstrict and l. he COllllty co~,trol, s it. It's estal:]ished by Cou:'.t)' Ordinances, not by the State and it can l:e changed b}.' the County Comminr;i¢:nerr~. Board >[ember i{eugeL: It says it ri~qht irt tile end of our ordiance. Board FIember Popovici: I would just like to say that you have done a tremendous job in £orsite in looking at an issue that we want to provide adaquate fire preLL, orion coverage. I do recall being }]ere at a meeting where East Naples did come to one of our meetings and did show an interest in wanting to provide service here. Their millage rate is at a decent level. As far as I understand the? have good protection coverage of t]~eir area. In all honesty looking at the fact that we l~ave tclrnovers as a result of the kids coming in, getting a little bit of knowledge ,]nd then moving out. Who's going to be here tomorrow? Chqi rman Wno~so?': ':'hey ,are at a <Jis.-ad',,'ant,]gr: Jn not rr~al.l'z. }:hying ,] pr~qr,~m for ','~tunteers. P,o,~Fd Hr~m]}r:r Pr)pr)vici: i think based on the fact ti:at it's only a one }'ear contract have no probZem siqt:ing thi.'; at; a.l. 1. F, oard :<eml:,:r ,Marinate: Z don't either. Chairman ;','oolsey: if e,~ct~ ~f ','o~l will. .~;i(tn L') }'ou ;,'ant to; LeJ;e a vote c~rl it:? C!~:irman Woolsey: :'y signing it ',,'o~: have agreed to it:. :';el I 0~. For thc, record, al 1 in fa',,or sa],' I, anybody e,,': :':o :'.~ :i. Carried. [ ha:.'e addressed alt 5 Commissioncr:: :n respect to our l~is;.- trict Com.mis.~ioner. : 'am going tr_) .n]ac~ each of the othr, r mi';:-:ienors a co..';}' in an envelope and let 7r:mmigsioner .h'orrJ:4 di.~-~tri!;ute then as he see's fit and who:', he sop's fit.. Board F:err.,i,'er ~tuegei: i!o;,' long will tl~!s take. C};,-.. i rsa n a;. qoin7 Lo :J. ;:a,r)les tr,:~,r)rr~.;..· and ' ',.'ill r}rr)p tbc, m off ;.:r. ;:orris's o£fic(,. The contract Jl-z going to be made the way t. he Count}, Com-- mis:Eioner:.: want it. Noard ;.toni;er.-.,.' -rinaro: would ] i]:e to P,.~t: for that. P, oard >tern} er ![ur}gel : ..... hi' ',:r: aught to. Chairm2n Woolsey: :'Jell i can ask fo[' that. Cha i r..na:~ Woolsey: :'eceived a letter stating I }:ave 2 ,-..ore meetings, Nov. and Dec. '~'i l! not seek re-~olevtion . P,'Ja:'d Xemker .:'opovici: Can't we twist your arm }:ere especially ir: light of what: is har>penin9 to pro;,'ide a continued service especially in light of tho potential transference of relationship from Isles Of Capri and E]st Xaplea. You have been such an {ngtr,.]mental part of this issue. Chairnan Woolsey: I will be glad te volunteer to assist you guys. I'll be a:,ait.:l:le anytime you need me. I'll do anything you ask me to, but ' 't -qq an offica! board member. ,Board >;ember I!uegel: ?oard :.S?mber P, ro::n: i3oard :4ember Po.:)ovici: :';r, a[:!;reciatn t.~:~, }~arr] ',.,'ork 7ou'.q };a','r, c',onr, [or t:hjr; "'-ir'; r:ltq i rrz.-~:; l':ool ::r.}': ~,'r):: }';,-l',": ,to }',r~ ,'~Fr,.C;:I !1():.: '.'r'.ll ']o t'hi'-;. '::3~ ' t ::q at: r,, , i ?r.? ,;c'f :' '" ~':'-:: ~;0%)': diztrict:-'. ',.'~, :lei )ia',r, '..'c.r'J: ~..". 211r~ '4c, Q~: ';f2Q? . Could ;~tt~:n'] just ,;aune their r,~,dular,mr:,~ting i:: at that time. tO:ilO[L'0%'. ..,,a i r?larl '~'/ r',a:~on of s~i',~inq :.;r. ::orris the pro[>osal to di:~trJbutr~ to t;}:~ other commissic,':ers i~ ho i:; our cr):u:ni:~sir)ner for cjistr'ct.. C}',a i rr'an ::r. :/orris :.:ill a:~s;.:er telephone calls from an>'i:od}'. I happen to know he answered one from my neighbor a.l;,o,at the.fi~e department ,,lot u'j, to code. Board ,'.!ember Po,r)ovici: -s it. correcteJ now? Jeff Page: 't's been corr:?cted since the last board meeting. C}~,]irc:an [,;oolsey: ,',.:; a matter of fact il; was done the day after she callr,d. The question was also brougllt up,the}, remembered in East that '.:e didn't have sl',e[)inq facilities tllat met code and I was hap[)y to assure them r~'::¢ 7;0 do. ;.;;:s ',;onderin'[ ] F wr? could you guy':; cou!c, just call the Ch[of and say put ~7r?nd,] For hr:"' mrCnth or r-;omr, thinc~ and v the ,-.',t i on . !~'>-]rd :.fr:ml;er iJopr~',ir:i ;;r,r'r,rlrJ:rrJ !.hr, Xeet[ng adjourned lC:F5 C.C. ,':d',.-i::orv Joard Mr, tubers Diane Flagg Public .Sleeting Multi-PageTM I 2 5 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 CONDENSED Page 3 3ust v.~t we ~'ere dotr. g ~'-~ your department, and believe me. ti',:3 ts your depart.me=. Y:,u've bought it and paid for it totally. Th: Islc,~ of Capri Fice £::paruncnt was established a little u. nder 20 yeaxs ago..m April of 1978. and the chairman at ti'tat time. I w;~,¢ interested -- even thought I wasn't here. I've heard et"nim, happened to be John ~stor. '*'ho sig~:'~ the d~D.:zation making this - making an ordinance that formed this fire district. It was started and szill operates under a millage cap of ?nc mil. For those c: you who don't know what a mil is. it's one dollax of r.z,a:: on a thousand dollars of taxable prope~'. I mean. that's after -- that's the appra:~d tax less. tf you :,": domiciled, your homestead exemF:ion. After th.at, it' one dollar per thousand. That c ne mil. and dmr is :mc cap that this depa.rtment has always operated on. Stzqing off back in :mose days. there was little out here except al:tis islan~ It was a jungle all the way up to -:1 and even ,.,.'ay ~:.':ond in either direction. At that time. it was totally vnnunteer and neighbor helped neighN~r and got along v..-cr'y well on half the millage rate. W: had just those ~'o uays over there. There was basicMly a garage and :nee closet behind it was the I .1 ¢ $ & ~2 13 ~o 22 23 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 Il 12 13 14 15 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 4 office. It pretty soon developed. With the continued development on this island alone, if you have been here a few years, have seen eight, ten or more buildings per year. in ten years that's what. 800 buildings or whatever - no. 80 buildings. Back to school boy. And not only that, but in addition to the extra building that's been going on just these four islands, if you haven't driven down Mainsail lately, go out thropgh there. That thing is double lined with condos on both sides, almost all the way out to the airport, and more being planned, some highriscs. (Inaudible voice.) A VOICE: somebody's going to have to pay for the facilities to do that. and it is within this fire district, and it's going to have to be up to us and them to do it. Un. fortunately, we have been here for 20 years. and we have built up quite a little nest egg here. I said we; you, because we aU pay thc same millage rate on our homes, our businesses or whatever thc properly we own out there, and it has been your advisory board~ that have accepted personally and deeply the responsibility of protecting your investment in what you have out here. This is an -- very small district. It covers 12 sections, and only parts of three others, and if you know what a section is. that's 12 square miles: three miles Gregory Court Reporting (9<1)774--4414 Page I - Page >ublic 5ieeting Multi.PageTM i D 4uvember 3,,1997 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 1I 12 13 14 15 16 17 I8 19 20 23 24 25 Page 5 ,:ne 'aav and tour the. ;:nee. and that's the entire district, and as you k-n. ,w. a great deal of it is :'~,an:."iand. rivers and, :.~tudible) go all the way to the G,all .': M-.x. lco on one s~at We're bounded on the north b': E..=.-: Naples Fire D;'p~,'wment. on the east by East Napl.-5. and ~ti the >our.'. -,v what is soon to be -- or is m,',~, actually, a CiD ,:r Marco. I'r.: referring to thcs: .-re. eau.se I don't want to leave .m'.,b~zng out if [ can hrJr t:. because I'd like to answer 2 h,t f questions beL?.-- -- I l:'.audibte con~ers:'-tan.) A ', OICE I needed :_-.mt little rest anyhow. I',~ like to point our -:nat the fire district tax is pa~d nly in this distal. .,, '. OICE could ~,u: Balk a little louder, plea_se? A . ~lC} I'm ,;orr: ; will try. This is a bigger cathedral than I had ,.au.' idea of singing in. T':..~ fire tax in thi.- .ti:strict is only paid by the residrncs in this district. I may have covered that bcf,)r:. It is for the usc of only this district. We :a'~:: 7. :t ~eer..c:~ er, a .7. :.-.::..: by anybody else. or nobody else , _xes Las bcirc,: x. : nay for what you have here. .md i: , thc preser:ation 'r this that is most intponant :,) mc -ccausc of v, hat :ezr_--.ay happened down in Goodland '.,,hz,':. '/ney got left ,;ut v: u:z Cit) of Marco and asked 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 lg 19 2O 21 Page 6 what had happened to their 38 years of payteg fire taxes. and were told. sorry, they're gone. and I don't want that to happen here and I'm sure you don't want u to happen here either. This board, which is basically only an advisor.,, board, we don't sign any contracts, we don't give an?body raises. We don't do anything because our real bosses. the ones that do all these things for u.',. tnake all ~e big decisions for us. is your board of county commissioners, of which the Honorable John Ngrris is number one on the list for his district. A VOICE: Makes you number one. huh'? A VOICE: Number (>ne in your hearts. A VOICE: They are our ultimate bosses, and tile flhat nmke the ultinmte decision.s on what happetts out here. Naturally. ms good commissioners, they're interested in doing what you want and what is I~..st fin you and the people who come after you and the people up in Maittsatl and so, m to be in Fiddler (?reek. becaus~swe gO all the way up to the far border of Fiddler's ,Creek. perhaps as far east &s the airport and then a n,mh-south line along there. With a section chart, it's diffi~uh to tell. because that's all woods hack in there anyhow. for the most part. until Fiddler's Creek gets ?lng. then the extension on beyond that. 2 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 I8 19 20 22 23 25 Page 7 Bf.ause ~.'.e are ~dlC'_; fire department. I wish to conl~r_: our discussion :cmtght to the fire department. fire b'.:.dness, peritx:l. V,': ::re not in a position to speak{ for or ~. an,, C.l~cr cc:.;:'.£x &v,'lsiOrl not sewers, not It'~Is. I ] not lighting distnct_~, n..,: mi>thing: strictly fire and fir: t~x_-s attd us: thee.--::' :., the only tiring that we can speak Ar,.~'~h:n.c eib: ,*: .=:d be shear conjecture, and I knou ?ou don't ~am w '.v,'a.ste your time with that. F,: se','er:d .'.rats. da: m this very rapid expatzsion and a_'nber t,t' call> ,'c.::=:;toned. probably more than anyfl;::.g els= b~ mr :ncr-'.,se of the populatiou itt this ...... xhe ';'.' 2e;'a:'..'uen: aas had problems. We don't hair :a,mgh -- didn't 5::lye enough facilities. We bert - .'d :~¢ :n~,.':c~ az,.: :7_:.arged tile station. We got a ne',t - later, ne,.er e.:'AltDment. Ail ,,f these thtr. zs '-..rtz necessary in any growth stru.a:: n. attd ~: :,:z?~ ?u:ulng Band-Aids and trying to a,,rk £~ v.'a~ and :.ga: .,tax and every time one problem was ge::;.'-.; ,olve.l. ;ar-:~.e.' :n.- ',,ould crop up. until acttmlly :.5:n.c~ :.ime tea ~,0..~r s~',:Z :,, us when back in the spnng or' th: ..'ar. I bell:'.: I: ..x;.k, probably about March. we · acre: · '. ?eked ~', '..".e .:'.:. ,:.:.':ment that with the budget sear 7 .:ely ~,:~i:' .~e:-.t: 7: ~lready 520.000 over budget. ina ... rnpar:;.:n.c :r.~: ~ .~ :.:z suggestion that xte simply ra~,: '_.x:,, 50 p.-r::.".: _- ?:ruposition which we didn't 1 2 3 `* 5 6 ? 8 9 I0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2`* Page 8 think that you people would necessarily relish. Now. we've cast around and stuthed every opuon that we could, and believe me. when [ say ~e ~pcnt hour~ ,n it. I have stacks of the minutes tl~at these guys put in discussing all kinds of things, some big. some little. but always coming down to the fact that v.,e need good. basic kno,,vled~lcable management here. and so we . I. on my own. contacted the East Naples Fire DepartmenU whom we had called upou two and a hall' years ago whetl the resignation of our then chief and a number of long-tim,. volunteers, very dedicated volunteers, threw the department into. well. a turmoil, and I use the word (inaudible). h ,,vas a lot more than that. At that time. we studied hiring paid firefighter: and found out from the county -- what bi it. human resources that handles how much it costs -~ A VOICE: we can't hear you back here. i, A vOICE: Move forward. (Inaudiblel ,: A ",'{')ICE: I'm sorm. but that's the best I cartldo. A VOICE. dnaudible) would have a speaker (inaudible) use that': A VOICE who'? A VOICE dnaudible} a loud speaker'? A VOICE Not that I know tit'. Gregor) Courx Repot'ting ,9--:I)774-4414 Page 5 -'Page Public .Meeting Multi-PageTM ]- 6 ]. l~ovember 3. 1997 I 3 6 7 9 10 II 13 1.:. 19 2O 2.2' 3 6 7 9 ~0 II I2 3 16 17 2t :2' :3 Page 9 A~.OICE Bull horn~ A VOICE: Bull horn; A vOICE: Not that I ~:m)w of. Th:~'s a chair up he':-: if you -- you're welcome to cake. l'm sorry that th.- ~:,ustics in here is what it i~. be: '.~'c had hoped to ?.:;we it in other places, and the re. om up there was detzr=amed to be too snmll. The ,::='t,m=mty house wasa; ix :at,able. and this is the best we :ould :nme up ~'ith sl',or. :: ~ming it out in the driveway. I xgill tr)'. if there'3 .mine point that you fail. ?lc~c. and I'll help .x,-u with it. okay'? A '. nICE Thank .xo~ ':cry much. A '.,'~icE the three oFm,,m that we finally wound down '.vide. the tint. I'm xure you would have found uvac,:.--p., table, because i; ,.;-a.s to do nothing, just let the place go to pot. Number two wa.s to d,: ms thc other independent fire distn.:s m th: county Pa'. ~. a~td that's be independent. 70 ~ :=gependem requ:::s .'m,,oney First of all. you have :o pa? - e!ec~ and pay' :Y.: =:'urd of commissmners. They ~.3ve ,~ ~l,"e 3a 3Ltovfi~,,. , : 7'-..:z2i/1 oge. You have to have 2ccounfings. Ali ,~I t2:'., takes money, and that's ~mc:2'.mg we don't ha',: nnless you want lo double or ~ripl: :.our ~s. but at ~v.' rate, the hirin~ of three t;,ret'i~ters, regular ~rcrfi~hters three -- two and a Page 1 I highl? for their management style. A '. nICE: rtnaudibl-'t b~r't)re you leave taxes, how :ucF, revenue do ~,e get o" of the Isles of Capri in taxes per >car? Do you have a figure for that'? A vOICE: It ~S somewmere around SI41.000. A ', ~ICE. ilo'a, ~,:~. :,.' wt: ~el out Of Mainsail Dnvc? A '. nICE That is ~ - I'm talking about the total distrwL It's not bre:&:.ntg down -- broken down sections. I don't knov, A VOICE: That's not mst the Isles of Capri. That's -- A '. nICE That is ',hz 'a.',q,ole district. That is the ,.vholc cistrict. A '. nICE DOCS £h.'q .-mean (inaudible). A '. )~CE ,~,at s n~".: x,,~., you have to remember. there'.: about a t~v¢ ye:es lag when the building is finish:-.] bed)re i~ g~ on me tax bill and taxes are acm:d;? paid on it. In o~,=r words, a person building a new L~use gets a free r~d: ,n taxes for about two years. and {:naudible~. A '. nICE: This $190..I)00 (inaudible). A ', nICE YES,, sir. A '. nICE ~Inaud~bie ts that just for fire'? A '. )ICE: That'S '*nat. mree paid firefighters and opera::ng in thc staa,,n with just basic operating Gregory Court Reporting O-:1)7744414 I 2 3 4 6 7 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 2.: 25 Page lO half years ago would have cost over S1~O.009,,. Now. you say that's a Int. It is. but the~base pay. you might as well double it. By the nme you pay hospital insurance, all kinds tff insurances.,, state retirement fund. you've run a 22. $23.000 ~ary up to nearly 45 and I've got people here that maY,?be~- more ~Laowledgeahle about it than I am. but doe, anyb:~xly here. that is. disagree with me': So that our -- it would have required a millage rate of almost 2 percent just to cover that. I talked with the people up in the East Naples fire thstnct~ to see how they would approach just contracting thc sc~',ce, their .service to us. using our building, our equipment and al the volunteers that we could muster m~ a contract basis They would, in other words, be our emph~yees. ~, We would hire them. using our taxes to do this fire department. They have been operating fire departments for years. and believe mc. they know how to do it. because arguably. I think East Naples is perhaps, if not thc. nile of the best run fire departments in the county. Ilnaudible~ it's the best. but it is the one deparmtem in!nine years that I've becu here fltat I've never read anytliing in thc paper where they were having disagreementa and pr ~blems and all that kind of stuff, and I think that speaks Page 12 expenses. A VOICE: 190,000 a year? A '*'OIC'E: YeS. around a hundred -- I think tt was 192. about 160 of that would have been firefighter pa.,.'. and the other 30.000 .lUSt for hce~tse, masntenance and that sort of thing, t,; A vOl('l= ,Inaudiblc ) would end up .ukmg;,hov. much each per )'ear'? A VOICE: well. just basic starting hrehghter, ii' I'm not mistaken, somewhere around 22. 23.000 Anyb,,dy know'? A VOICE: (Inaudible} at (inaudible} ca~fh. A VOICE: Pardon?~: AVOICE an. audible )thcch~ct't taudbc)qg,I).000 (Inaudible) but you svanted to talk tire only {~onieht. A VOICE: That's right. I am talking ;~bout {i firefighters. A VOICE: okay. A volr£ ;Iuaud~ble ) each one ,,f ,,ur flr~f, tlhter,i makes aN)ut 55.000 a year'? :, ^ vOICE: No. no. no. No. the.'.' make -- I know. i'm n(,t a paid firefighter and I d,)n't knt,w, hut it's somewhere. 20.000 for a stance, for starting pay for a firefighter. That's thc szlaD, plus all thc FICA taxes and all that just added ,n to it. which the Page 9 ~ Page 12 Public 3leering 2 3 8 9 10 2 3 15 16 1'7 18 19 20 Multi-Page TM 21 22 22 2-: 25 Page 13 :.':.,?'h". ::. which '.,.ould ~'.~: r, een us. would have had to pay A . ICL '.',e~l. :'.he d,,:- ;;.now these figures': [ mt:an ~inau2iblet. A ', DICE. He says [' _q. a little high (inaudible) a little ?Jgh. ^ '. DICE ^cmallx. :ne firefighters, with his ,inauCaNe~ ['-.ar and to(a_ hack^ge is around $35.000 a pe,",,c :. and ~at's 'a~, Ns :-"ne(its and salaD' of around 22.23.,Y~. st} ;,ou'r= a Little high on that ntm~ber. I O. mk I had ta (mem..err.. because (inaudiblel. A '. DICE That's la. ne That's fine. A 4CE You're h.~k:.:ng at about $90.000 for three pe,T.:. ^ . IcE !,).* -,~ hue'a: nave about 5140.0OO coming in rigzt now.' A '. DICE ~Ir. audibtel A .,')ICI:. Oh. well. btu you have to realize we have a nm~.:age on the buildi:g that we're still paying off. and :hat is roughly 25. 300 on :hat. ^ '.DICE Th^('Il b= z;aid off next year though. won'- H? ^ · )ICE 200(' A '. DICE A ,ICI Nap :..--5 ' A DICE ^ '. DICE A '. DICE .November 3, 1997 No. itv.~=': ~ paid off until April of Page 15 Yes. sir fha: don': ~::mng -- that belongs to East 1 2 3 a That's E~; Naples. ~ ',',e can': '..u.~e that then? 6 well. nth at,,. I will kind of turn this 7 over _. ii(tie hit later if ecu want any projection as to 8 who . .goill.;:' It) use 'o.~: it: ~e people that are going to 9 be -- would be doing ~:. m ^'.DICE dnaudibie building Fiddler's Creek ~inau.uhle~ 951. t.~ fir.- ~tation up there is not going 12 to (i:.::udible, 13 ^ '.DICE ertl'., Fa..-. F it. 14 A '. OICE Huh? 1.5 ^ · DICE only ?~'-: ~-' Fiddler's Creek. 16 A '. DICE Ir, other ~..'~rds -- 17 A '. 'DICE. The tother -,;a~ -- is A ' O/CE -- if there' a fire (inaudible) well. 19 that', ~..,. part. this i~ >oas part. you don't come over 20 here n this s~de. Is :iv,: what you're saying? 21 A · )ICE: I'm saying '.~,-:'re charged with taking fire 22 -- ca_-: of fire in our JS~..'rr. ict. 23 :,. '. 31CE I'm m:e:_--.;e:d right here where I'm 2a simaz. Isle ,,t Capr: 25 A . 51CE I 2 4 5 6 8 9 I0 11 13 14 15 16 ~17 :19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 i {3 6 J. ~ Page 14 Yes. sir. ^ VO<E: Ila.s this fire department always covered the area that it covers now'? Arc we c,wcring ~hc same today a.s what we were 20 years ago (inaudiblcl': A VOICE: Safiqe geographic area'? A VOICE: Yes. A VOICE: Yes. sir. Yes. sir. ^ voicE: ,ts it is now. we have our own cqhipment we own the building, and the only thing v.e'rc shoq firemen. Is that (inaudible). A VOICE: That's the -- A VOICE: That's the whole problem'! A VOICE That's the basic pmhlem A VOICE: well. how much more would it c~st us hire the firemen and keep all our equipment ag, d mn ourselves on the island? Why should we givekl,t to the county and let them mn it and we probably won't have Iht: Service we have linaudible). (Applause). A voleE, what happened to that ,mt: tip on 951'? Was that etnpty up there': I go by there ami there's.fire trucks in there and everything else. and th?t one's ch}ser than anything down here that wu can get -- ^ '.'OtCE: That's part of the East Naplc~ (inaudible). ~age 16 A VOICE: l'm not interested in Fiddler's Creek. Main.sail and things like that. l'm just interest"ed fight here. i' A vOICE: That is part of our district, sir (inaudible). A VOICE: That's part of our responsibilit). A VOICE. why should these pe,~ple lina,,udihleL ^ voice when they re paying taxes, t~by II paying taxes -- A VOICE: (Inaudible). A VOICE: - tO this same department. A VOICE: That's right, that's tight, and.we're interested right here in what we gt)t. A VOICE: It seems tO be working fine linaudiblet. A VOICE. That's fight. Why change it'? Eveq'th tlr is good. %'by throw something tn that", not {re. audible! We (inaudiblc}. A ','OlCIC well. I'd rather continue this as lllha~,c it worked ()ut. A %'Ol¢IL okay. ! seen] to think that if sortie of the irfformatmn isn't accuratt: becaust: iht: ',a[anc,. ~'¢nt.frum 35 to 65 back to 35 and -- A VOICE. Those numbers that I gave you were projected figures that I have in a printout in fi}~?, at home. Gregor)' Court Reporting t9,,:1)7744414 Page 13 - ~age I' Public .Xleeting Multi.Pagem Nove~nber~3. 1997 5 6 7 8 9 I 2 13 14 15 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I 6 7 o 1 2 3 J. 5 6 7 18 19 I:° 21 22 23 25 Page 17 T'ru-= -- two -- th. re:.. '.',el a half - two and a half >::ars igo. when we were minking about going paid. in other '.~ords. paying fir;'ff~nters to run the station full time..md those -- and :- they are -- if there are inacc='-acics or exagg.-'m=,:uts. I apologize, but those ',``'ere :/qe figures -- oni'. figures that I had in hand A '.,)ICE. You kno'.,. :,"'s saying 35. you're .saying , inau2ible~. ,-,, '..)ICE. well. hz'.-: L==. man that km)ws. He's the ,inaugihlc). A ~.OICI:: So we're ha._::, m 35 (inaudible) is that ri,_2ht ' A'.OICE Yeah. A ', ,)ICE Ilow coin= :.3~ boa/d didn't come to u.s at one, ." thc meetings thzI the civic a.ssociation , inauJiblel communirx without anyhtxly else -- A '.OICIi. lhat's a had ca meet in hour h, A '. OICE ')','er at the ::ivic a.ss-ciati~m -- A '. ~;ICl'. No. ',~c ha,,: this -- this l'x)ard mccLS here c'.::-: .-2,.;fsda?. gver".. 5. rs: --hurstby ,ff every re.nth and It'S bran doing it for ~' least eight years that i pe.'~o:,2? kn o'a, '.,ou l':'.e hezn and sc)mr ~' you have not. but it is a publ[, meeting that is s,=neduled, and if there is a I 2 3 6 7 9 lO 12 13 14 16 17 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 19 A '. :)ICE: Do we v;a.n: t, mm this over (inaudible)? 1 A '. OICE: Well. tharJ: you. Skip. 2 A '. OICE. well. let's ::lear up some things first. 3 This .~:ntlenuan says wh? 9i,.,e it to the -- why give this 4 build=g to the count'.,' ~ ray more. Well. the county 5 owns :.his building. 6 A .')ICl. Right no~..--'vrrything you see in here 8 behm2s to the counts A'.OICE ilnaudibie I0 A '.OICE And .',~u c:an't pay more. II A . ,)ICI! Ju~: aminu::. Plea.se listen, folks. You 13 ha~e; :ne md hm:t ca~ Y. u can't change that w~thout 14 votin.z to ctkmg.~ it. You ..:a.n't pay more. Okay? All 15 right Nc'~,'. >'our advison, heard, which is advisory to the 17 coun:'., :omnnss~on. has ~ a request or suggestion, if 18 you '.<il. of options to A'..unge from a purely volunteer 19 ser,.ic: tn contract ,.vith m:' East Naples fire department l20 to p re'. ide the manpo,.,.er Lee me tell you a few of the [21 thin_c~ :hat this docs na~ :n:=ourage. because I drink that i 22 will ,.ear up a lot of ,,,':ur concerns. k: cs not mcan :~a: ,, ?: r: going to merge v. ith the !2.1. East ~'.sples fire departm=n::. It does not ntean that Ease 25 1 b¢ 1 ':Page,S change, it's posted. If we have to delay or ~mething. but this has always been an open meeting~ ^ voicE: tlnaudible). ^ VOICE: Did anybtxly ask'.' Did anybl)dy ask.' (Inaudiblel. ^ vOICE: (inaudible) I think l inaudible). A VOICE we didn't know it was broke, so we didn't buther fixing it. A VOICE: Icl George do it. As Iota., ;ts Georee is handling it, forget it. right'? A vOICE, well. just let us know if it's~r.kc. 3 , A VOICE: Yeah. right. A you'd: You know. I think we're at a point ~'here I think we oug...ht to hear from maybe Commsssu)ncr right now. It think that perhaps -- we're a fin~' little community here. We have a small fire (maudlble)'~e can take care t)f ()ur needs, but this thing was contemplated to take care t)f Mai*tsail ,r this ~,iant and perhaps we should get this thing redistricted.' I mean. East Naples could handle it a lot be,er. If y()u got five trucks sitting out there, y()u've got ah)t mt)r( equipment than we do. A VOICE: dnaudible). A VOICE: Very well. ;~ , (Inaudible). Page 20 Naples fire department is going to take over ~'our fire district. It does not mean that you're go,ma Pay more. You can't, as I've already said. Y,u've got ~.one mil millage cap. You can't go over that unless ygu vote do so. W'hat you have right now is a partly paid service. partly volunteer service w~th abrupt 5(I ;~erccnt covlerage As I understand the proposal, and we'l! hear more abou! It tumurrow at thc c,unty commlsss,,n Hleellng. ~:a~l Naples has agreed to contract fl~r thc .same muncy that you're paying right now to pro``'ide you 24 hour. seven day a week. 365 day a year. fully profe~,imul lire ser,.ice the same price. A VOICE: (Inaudiblel. ?iii A VOICE: why'? ^ VOICE: well. in that case. we base no problems (inaudible). ~:' (Inaudible). ^ voiCE: I thoueht this land wa.., donated ~.,,' some woman from the ~'sle th Capri linaudiblef? A VOICF_: whether it is or not -- whether i~i!was not donated is material. The coum'. ,~.n.s tmaudtble~ ^ VOICE: well. ! didn't kno,.v that. I'thought (inaudibleL A ','olctL Sow. the other part. a~, ! underC4and the Gregory Ct)un Reporting ¢9,41)774-4414 Page 17-'iPage 20 Public .Meeting Multi. PageTM November'3, 1997 1 2 I0 Il 12 11 Ii' 18 19 2O 2..:' 25 Page 21 ?r,oc,-!at -- excuse m~'. ?;=a.se. As [ understand the ?.-epe,.... ~t's for a one .~: :.mae pen{x1 with a one year r:nc,a .~5tc (~pti{m..-'.,t t:.~ re}iht, at any point in that. ..urea..7. we can all ge: =ac:K together and decide we don't ..kc i, and stop doin.g' it. or we might .say wu like et. ex:D'thing's fine. le:'~ :'ondnu~. You've got your choic.: ,ff doing that. B~ the ~'a.v. th~ othzr min~ that it does not do is ./b~ll:'..': sour ILM.', SgP,'ic: -~r'iod. It doefill't affect it. [xts ~..~ separa~: zounr, :zntity and it's -- whatever b.appr:..s v.-ith .,,,mr isle ,,: .Zaph fire service, it won't chant: '.',*ur EMS ',er, ,,:::' here un the island tlxlay. ,Inaudibie working (inaudible). The~'ll 5r duing exactly what they're It '.~,m': affect thetn at all. A. 31CE A. d,4nz '.,~d a'. Ye-..,,ir A '. ')ICE Is this ~',:z~7 heft,re the board now , inac_:blc,. A · blCE F,,r A '. DICE A '. DICE F~,r a A . )ICl. 'r'zS. 1~ w~, ¢:hcdulcd m go I~st week. but br.au~c ~:r: ~'~ ,.) ]Ituch inter,st and so much I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 24 1 interest to go ahead and ha~ ~ i~um~a~mahm~tin2 tonight. A VcqCE: flare we chucked out an ahernati%'e like Wackenhut? (Inaudible). A VOICE: well. no. we -- frankly, we have not checked out Wackenhut. A VOICE: tlnaudible) my name's Pete ti~mudibleL i live on the isles here. You said it's going t,~ he presented to thc Cullicr board tumorn)a Is thal you're presenting it with thc impre,;shm that that what the community here wants, the fire district (inaudible)'! A '¥'¢)ICI! Thc county cummissim: is rcspm!dmg m a request hy your advisory board ti) h)t)k i,,tt) this matter. We. will examine It tnmorrl)u,' anti a~,iumahly v.'e'll~'make decision whether to pursue it ~lr not pursue it. A Vt'HCI;; ¢)kily. As far as a request [rom ~he liee advisory hoard, from my understanding, u,'e have heard here today, a lot of people weren't aware o1' this l inaudible! being brought up. A VOICE That's why we're having thi~ meeting tonight. A VOICE okay. But with this meeting' tonight. (inaudible} majt~rity iff the people dtm'l request this. Page 23 ~ are '..a still g,:qng t,, ".'role it tomorrow? 2 A )ICI 'J.'hzI: '..,m -~". table it. you nleall discuss 3 :t .) a A . 51CE ,Inaudlbi~ 5 ( l.'._.ud ible) 6 ,*x , )ICI: ~.'clI. why '.,~.nuld you do that when the 7 ccn'xT....z;ty a~ a '.,.rmie ge':'. : eying to show you that. l 8 belie".: ~i,"ut;Idibl=) my,,:t: taking a little survey and 9 have - 2me mFut (inauc:.inle'} questionnaire that -- I0 4ue,,:: '..s er, at ,".at: ~ec.". 77 -.a,.,2.t to rny attcmmn, and thc 11 !TIDJoT.Z. of th: ?.copt: ~zu I spoke to do not wish this. 12 .~nd :: .': cmr.:z'..:-.;:'., d'x,: w~sh this. I'm ~,ndenng why 13 .'.ou':: :'oin'.z r~: bring i: z~n lot a vote mmorrov,' when l4 x'.a> ': 2c :ir: .,d'. ts,)r, '-, ,,~.m. there '.,.'as ulldcr thc v, rong 15 trap.' :: .HOB. 16 A , ')ICE Okay. We:IL a cuuple of (inaudible). 17 A DICE I can ansv,,zr that. 1§ A. JICF First,flail. ~ we dtm't bring it up. how 19 can '.;: vote a~'alnst et. .'~ecolld of all -- 211 ~. ,ICl: Ap,', hnnc :: up'? If we're happy, why 21 brine : up.' 22 A , .DICE xt, l'lx bn.n£ ,t up'? 23 A )ICE. I'd like to :att-tricot (inaudible/ whets you 2.: have =n opp~r'mnity. 25 A ,ICE. ,,v.- brine it .me. sir. becattse it's a matter 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 I0 ill 13 15 16 17 18 19 12o {22 24 iiPage 24 of procedure. Your adviso~ board has requested the CoUBty ct.)mlrllSMOll to It)ilk illlt) the llliJtlcr Dr) yml ,..,ant us ti) say. n(). we d()n't care finaudiblc). ' A \,'DICe; We {inaudihle} a meeting e,.er.,,' iI'hursday night. If they have something llnaudlblc)mq),,rlata like tonight, the people showed up. didn't they': It they said somethi:lg. {imludlblc } ,)r .J I,,! of lette;r,i i)ut ~*r somcthiog, a big thing is comin.e, peuple would have showed up. A VOICE WC needed tu be n~,tificd iff-- A VOICE wi: need t()be nlltilicd (inauttiblc). A %'()ICL [hat', a separate isy, uc. [.cz'., I{a'.< that alone for ti)night and just talk abuut the issue. (Inaudible) {Inaudible ). A vt)ICY That's a separate issue, l.ct'% talk about that St)hr: other time. If )ou watlt better IIt)lilicati()ll. yt~u km*'.t, sar can get that for ^ vOICE I have a questh~n t'~lr AvoIcE Yes. A VOICli ()nc. if this does take tricot, wiiat will happen to thc people on our payroll n,,.*,. Ibc tir¢ilightcr,, that are being paid down at the statil,n'! A VOICE well. I d(m't kin)v,' thc answer to tha Gregory Court Reporting (9,,:1)7744414 Pa,,c 21 Page )ublic .'sleeting Multi-Page*" Page 25 November 3. 1997 {5 1 I P ,ge26 6 7 8 9 10 :; 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 qu:sn:n. I'kat's one of :::= things we need to discuss tomor':ow. A '. 31CE IIOW man.',' _--ne: will East Naples supply down here'.' A \ .5ICE: well. Chief '_"iil~lk (phonetic} will be glad to talk m you aNnUl tlut :n just a minute, as soon as ?ou".e asked all .,,'our ,:mestions t)f me. A '. >It':E: Yes. Comm:s~noner. George /inaudible). I t,~ink if the people could nmar what is wrong wifll the rr:,,en: operation and 'al~,.:a ar: the advantages, wlutt an da: ad. am.ages to hay(nc 'ne: E:lst Naples (inaudible) ma':'b: aearing linaudibl: might make sen.se to them. ^ ',O~CE. ^11 right. A ',DICE: (Inaudible A ', DICE I'll Ir':' t,, _z,r, through it again. '¢,%,a's wq'ong with th:~ -- if wc were talking aN)ut · .mi5 aN)ut the NIc or ('.anti. I don't Otink anything's wrong, but you're not ':. ,u have m. from this little :fitatior. oil a volunteer seF',tre, service Marco Shores. Mairt,.zil add Fiddler's C.-'m:k. As that grows in the furore, it's not going :, ne able to dr) it. ,.', '. Diet:: tta,.r an)' or :mr fir:tight:rs (inaudible). H.~s t:'.')ody complained ;:'cut (inaudible). anybrxly that's ama:,>' involved? ^'.DICE YeS. 1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 1 12 13 15 16 17 19 20 21 23 2.* 25 A vOICE: And how many tU~es and who were those, you know. I mean. wl~t are they compla,nmg about that the)' don't have (inaudible). A VOICE: Well, your advisory b.ard has;-- A VOICE: (Inaudible). ^ VOICE: Your advisory board is the only tm: listen to. ^ vOICE: okay. But they don't linaudibll?. (Inaudible). A VOICE: (Inaudible) speak up ii' you'll listen. a VOICI-: we have a meeting ()ncc a month. (Inaudible). A VOICE: That's another (inaudible). ^ volct.:: we're concerned that you don't pm this through without tm being able to have enough fin,: to figure ()ut what we really want. A voICE: All right. Let's go -- let'.; go one more time Y.u have - y,u keep cverythme y,,,'vc g()t Y,,u get mt)re coverage, more men. nit)re cquipmctlt :at you disposal for tile same price. Do you want to do that or do y.u mit want t. d{) that'? A VOICE: why do you guys want that'? A VOICE: why do you want it'.' (lnaudibleh A VOICE: Eagle Creek's going to he aN)ut three Page 27 I ::.-...es :.:-" stz. e of the Isle :.:' Z.apn and /inaudible/. W'hy 2 ,.an't :.';cy get their own Err'..' dcparmlcnt? (hmudiblc) 3 buy U. eir own (inaudibw.:i. a A . ;ICF.. when you ~n~ ,m the mdlage, who votes on 5 that. :est (inaudihlc~. 6 A '. '~ICl! .'.il register.-'-.a voters v, ithin tile Isle of ': Capr: Jistrict. 8 A ', OICE NO. there'- no (inaudible}. 9 (Ir. audible). io A · )ICE ,Imqudihlr. ~;nc quesu()n. Why is East tt; Napl=: io anxi,,us and '~,,ili,n,; to pr,)vide this service? A '.DICE well. we".i l,.'t them ans~'er that. 13 A ', DICE. Thank y(-,u. 14 A vOICE: sir. will c,~,:.~ affect our fire insurance 15 rate'.) 16 A'.OICE: YeS. D,,~'"nward. )7 A ', OICE: Probably dl:)wn. 18 A '. DICE: DO yOU wamt to put that in writing? 19 A ', OICE: But the,,' w;un't go up. 20 A ', ")ICE: NO. 21 A '. 'neE: 'rhat depends on the Is(') rating of the fire 22 depar'z_~ent. The better th= fire deparm)ent, the lSD 23 rating and the lower the insurance rates. 24, A '. DICE: I have orle more question. 25 A ', DICE: okay. I 2 3 5 8 9 I1 13 16 1'7 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 P, age 28 A VOICE: Have you made up y,,ur mind'?a ^ vOICE: No. ^ VOICE: YOU have to just (immdible}. I: A VOICE: Absolutely. A V(')ICE' where is E~st Naple', g,,iug ti) gc~ :xtra men to (inaudible). A VOICE: once again, we'll let Chicl Shank that. (Inaudible). A VOICE. dnaudible) fl~r this t,, g,, berate thc board t)f commissioners? A VOICE: p~dtm me? A VOICE: l}o:~'t you think this i~uc i~ a little hit e~ly to go before the bo~d of {inaudiblcLj, A VOICE: well. let me explain one oilier ~in~ t~. Tomo~ow. ~e most likely ~ing thai hap~n~. ? ally -- if we do any~ing at MI. if we mkc acdon ~ a board of commissioners, what we'll do is say. ha~c our s~ff negotiate with ~e stuff of E~st Naplc~ tire distfigt to see if we can come to a mutu~ ;l~rCClllCllt. and at time. it'll go back to ~e ~ard o~' omunissione~ for fi~ approval, but it probably won't be a thai action tomorrow. A VOICE: well, that's no guarantee· and l just think it's a liNle (inaudible}. Gregou Court Reporting f9-al)774-4414 Page 25 - Page 28 Public .Xleeting Multi-PageTM 2 3 8 9 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 24. Page 29 .,, '. olcE: flnaudibi= ^ '.,~ICF.: Pete linnudir.::l again. I don't think the cc:n::;_r.:::.' ::yen ~an=~ t~ .c:':ng from the commissioner~ East .',,Nos lo sec ff .~ou .:'.- zom¢ up with ail agreement. I ~im, ~'e nerd m find t,~ here first, on the island, or th.- s~r.~q: fire district. :f : even should go that far. ~d I 'aould ask the cowc-..n:ssioner to recon.';ider the prope~al they put to ?da :,: add a contract with East A \ dICE V. ell. {ina~ible). A '..)ICl! .Ituudibl: ~at they take a hx~k at the ¢omn:=nily ;ks nol her:. =' least take a vote fronl Lhe ,:cram_troy. beca'a.qe .'.da c~ ."m~: right down to it. this is a matte.- of life and A',OICE Yes. th3:'! =defect. ^ '. dICE Exactl', :':_"nt. ^'.dICE dnaudibie A '..IcL lust a mm...::r _et mc back you something here. A'.OICE N,,. !e:rnr ask you something. A :"~ :r.~.z:;i: When It cnmc'~ down lo fire 7:: :::-. n al;,.: I2,'.x ',c.".:.:, ~-'.mch I understand will not be tir. xudib!c~ is pr, lxl,:~: :inaudible}. A .. dCl! '.sell. ':da':': writ, rIg. You've been told 1 2 3 .1 5 6 9 10 I1 12 13 14 )5 16 1'7 18 19 20 21 22 23 November 3. 1997 A VOICE: well. it still come~ d,v.n lO :1 matter life ~d death semices here. I think the whole community ~hould ~ revolved in a vote t, find .ut wha: eye,one in ~is whole district t~cls, n.t a matter thc conmfissioners present to you. a~ tiff, lady up bore ~fid. it went up to you ~mys wi~om the c(,nm~u,ity knowing about this. I think {inaud~blc~ board (inaudible} present it to Mr. (Applause.) (Inaudible). A VOICE: dmudiblc} but what hapl~Cn~ to thc chic~ in the other place'? (Inaudible). (Inaudible). A VOICE: flmudiblcl and it would ,.t. E~crsthmg would not be the same. A VOICE: (Inaudiblc~ decides he wants to Arizona tomnrrow, what's the dmcrcncc) AVOICE flnaudibleL A VOICE. P~don A VOICE p~don me? This gcntlcman'~ nexl.~ avolcE tlnaudibleldov,,uthmk this happen ~rsomlly? Do y()u think fl.- .h,,uld happen/ A VOICE Do [ think it should happen'.' A VOICE: dnaudihlc) sh,uld happen' A voice well. I haven't made up mx I;lllld vet. bill 2 5 6 7 8 9 I0 Il 12 13 14. 15 16 17 18 19 20 2I 22 23 24. 25 Page 31I can ~r~ .s.u tha~ there', ?:.~:)re ti) the issue ~ wltat 1 happ.-zs here ,m the Isle of Capri. 2 A '. OICE I.S he ~,id ,.-:tough to vote (inaudible). A '. dICE There's ~ -uggcr district -- A ', OICE Are you ,':ti. enough to vote? A ', dICE There's ?. -)lgger district than just this! island If it wa.~ just '.h> :.;land. everything was fine. 7 but ir , not. and ,,.'e ~'..a'.: l;, face the reality that you people acre ar.- going t,, :.:ave to. in the future, dig into 9 your 7..,cket ant rai~.= .~,y.:r millage rate to build a new stall, :. over there a: >. rote point in time if nothing Il chane.-'$. 12 A '. dICE %~.e sh ,u;d near from those people. 13 ¢Ir. iudiblc), la A ', OtCE. v~c sh, aid near from those people ts (inau21ble}. 9,'e sh,~ui,: ted how they feel. A '.dICE Mr. N,,r:::.. (inaudible). ]'7 A . t¢'[ v.'hS'~mn:.::-;:' many of,~s did not know. I 18 underi:and y~u coulee' get acc.mtnodations for 19 (ir,.auc. rie ) I ur..:c:"sun= :.ant no one from Main.sail is 20 being represented her',' It sounds like. although 21 (inau~ ::e ) sound, 13:: ', : ',,.ere approached (inaudible). 22 It sour..:a ~dke we need :. ':: :nformation and people from 232.1 Main_-.,<1 linaudihl:~ :n.. r: mfom;ation. I am offended Lhat eL'.: )ugh I ha'.::,",': %:: ,uoken to. I'm being spoken I25 Page 32 for. I would like to know liluudihlc) ,o that we can help thc advisury board (ir~udiblc~ right infl)~ation. (InaudibleL h should be up u, u5 t,~ decide. m protect Mai/mail and those arca~. We ju~[ want all thc infommtion belbrc you all titkc it t,) a ~(,c. We'd hkc to help ~e board do that. and thc ,,ri;'. ~ay ac ha~c {inaudible) we want that (,ppt,rmmty (Applause). A ye)Icl: ..xnd ~c artswer t, flu, i, ~c ye already delayed it a wz:k se) that you ct)uld ha%c this meetine ~ t(might where you could gather mt,)rmati,)n. dnaudible). A VOICE: Let me ans~'cr v,)ur question. explained everything that we kn,,w to this p,)int.~ A VOICE: To who.) ' A VOICE %) (Inaudible.). A VOICE. what's going to chang: in a monffi from what you'%e been told It)night Itl a llloBIh from now?j A %'dICE We don't (Inaudible). A VOICE: There is n. (inaudible) at this poinl. Gregor?' Court Reporting ,9,,:1)774-4414 Page 29 - Page 32 Public .x, ! eel ing Multi-Page TM November 3,, ! 997 5 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2a 25 1 ? 8 9 10 I1 12 13 16 17 19 2O 21 22 23 25 Page 33 A ',,~ICL well, can ?,'u hx)k into it (inaudible). A ', OICE: l'd like to fi=~d some of these questionx tonig~:. A . ~,1C£ we kno'* ~a: we've got. We don't know what 'xe're going to g~... /Ir..aud ible,L A '. OICE: Let's have :nme order here. folks. (Ir. audiblel. A '. OICE. we're goi.:~ to get the same or better service, h's mu going t. cost us any more. (I:.audiblcl. A '.OICE: Give him ~ chance-- A '. OICE nnaudible condt~minium ass~x:iation ,~ua.":e~ and I'm Ilrau:::-,:::~ We have 56 UraLs. You ~a','e - a lot of .',uu ha~: :~ne house. The rest of you Ii'. e d'wn on *inaudibl:, nave more responsibility, but the)' i'ave guaranteed us ,'r they have .',;aid, no~xly guara=:=s nothm_e but d...:'..ath and taxes, we're going to get th: sa.me or better se,'-'qce. Our insurance rates rna' go do'.,n. It probably wcn:'t go up. Now. what is the probi:m? A '. ')ICE: one. we don : have any control over the fire ~:panment an.vmt, r-_-. A '.OICE: We don't ~mve control now. (I.-.2udible). Page 35 ^'.OlCE ~Inaudibte A '. OICE Ht)~' can ..we get the better service ~mau~.':!e) ~r..ce p,:.ople htr: and we don't know how many they're .:omg :o send. Tr.e'. rany not send anybody down here. ^ '.,vice ',vhv don': w,: ask Chief Shank? ^'.OICE v~'hv don': we ask Chief Shank? (A?plausel. A '. :,lc~:. : :'~ank you. C.'..='r~rnissioner. for interjecting this. :'j just Eke to introumze myself. My name's Phil Poppavichi ~phoneticL l':n, oo the advisory board. Y(: a folks are MI here 'mnJ.u. ht for a ',,'cry important mast)= We're all her: for long-standing fire protection. cover:ge. We are I )okln.r :o77 a long-term r~medy, not a shon-:.erm Band-Aid. Wl. ktat is most important to us? Knov,-.n.e that we ha,.': a pr'n)blem either from a fire sir,ant:.: that ,,to ha'.,: go,,d ~;uaI:fied manpower there to put it .ut? Looking Ibr mx furore, not only ourselves but o=r children and our children's children. Nc ~,'. it has been rnana.~ted by our fire protection distri:: that it covers mo~ than Isle of Capri. This is not s.:.m:thing that we',.e d~::ded. This is something that was a:iineated for us. For us to turn a blind eye on respo=:bility is not ~,e .-~ea':can way and I don't think it's W.: way of anyone n:.':re in this room. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 9 10 I1 12 13 14 15 16 17 lg 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 l0 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 22 i2~ 25 'j. 6G 1 gPage34 A VOICE: A~ a commumty -- they're speakin~ for us and they didn't come to us. tirst: first of all. Seeond of all, how do we know that all .f a sudden (inaudibltD (Inaudible). A VOICE: 0naudible) rammed down our throats (inaudible). , (Inaudible).. A VOICE: HOW long docs it take to n~ake a d~ision (inaudible). (Inaudible). A VOICE: Please. let's keep this in order, folks One question at a time. please. (Inaudible). A volcl:: we all can't hear y,)u if you all talk at the same time. One at a time. A VOICE: The answer to your question is tha0 you're doing this -- or the prorn)sal b,. if we do this. if we this. t w he on a one-year contract ba';is.1 If we don't like it. we can cancel it at any time we want to. A VOICE: why can't we cancel it right miw'? A VOlCl:': Because there's nothing to cancel right nOW. (Inaudible). A VOICE: You're against hotter service, mt)re coverage at the '~ame price, and '.,,u've mad,: your piimt P~ge 36 Secondly -- (Inaudible). A VOICE: Let me finish, l,flks, please. Amid a dwindling and reduced volunteer base that we're facing on a day-t~.day ba~,p,, hudgctar'y problerhs. issues that come up repeatedly and ongoing, we are looking for a brag-term, c~aahhq~cd remedy What c-uld we do. Three things Skip wa.,, so eloquent in doing. Nothing at all. If we do nt)thingn at all. what would happen. We are currently being governed organizationally through Emergency Medical Sen'ices. That's the way we're delineated in the county. These folks have a duty ;md obligati.n to crt'lure that we have proper fire protection. What will they do. They wtll mandate acuons What actions will they be'? We have no idea. What we're looking at is an added proposal.!We're I(mking at options st) we can dmose, not neces~rily be told '.,,'hat we must have. and in all honesty, we braked at nearby fire control thstricts, askmg them v, hcther or not they'd be interested in looking at our distri~:t possibly provide a service. And agam. the covmnis~,tpner was very eloquent when he said that we w,uld mamtam ,,ur facilities, our budget would .or change in totals of millage rate to the individuals. We would have ongomg Gregory Court Reporting (9,,41)774-4414 Page 33 - Page 36 Public .Sleeting Multi. PageTM November 3. 1997 I 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 5 6 17 18 19 20 2I 22 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 37' :L~ ?r '.:ecnon armd Mo pa.~' ,lly paid individuals and a d,ainditng wflun lend , ,- side A) A '., )ICE: "sc wailt to .'~"~kke .sure thai we're there It) protect you. A ', .')ICI!: We haven': .:cad a problem {inaudible}. A '. DICE: Thc issue -- t Ir..,udihlel. A '..)ICE Walt a minu:-- Excuse me. [ would like to adgress that. ma'am A. AcE .Ir~audlble~ ~,..'7'_::'.;me {inaudible} working not. Inaudible} to prc~zt us. A '..:.rE : unde.~La.~d T.~.. ma'am, but as we have a ~,w,:ng fire dis(rte(, v,,:-., must have -- A '. "?ICE Let me m~-.az sure I understand her prop,3al. Her proposai !: (o wait until we do have a see{out problem and th.-= we'll talk about (inaudible). A '..,ice .My propoxa~ :s to wait until we have a L,et's all discuss it. vote and then they go to yot civic ~-,ociation nleztig.e take a '. otc. hand thc:n :~.-' with ::. A'.DICE Okas. AEc (lnzudihlc~. ['d like to address that. .-,, . ')ICL Plz~e icc mz address that. I a.m als() on thc b, -_rd ot directors for .mc civic a.ssociation. The cixic ~..-;,x:iation in icsz!f :~l~es not have any control Page 39 quest: ?n. With regal-ti '~, your position -- A '. OICE dnaudihie ^'.olc£ I intend :c ;mswer it. sir. Could you pica. s: ::11 mc ,,'hat remv, Li::s m situations you have for the fire control dis(ftc; :ff Isle of Capri'? A . '.'ICE You're ob'.'~o'.~,,, much more knowledgeable. Wh5 .'.:st can't you prm.,zpt it to us'? A '. 'DICE ,mu're thc ane that's saying there's prohi=.'ns. A '. OICE AbSolute!'. ^ '. )lc[~ You're tellir.~ us there's these mammoth prohl.-::.4s. Tk.:rz's not on_- person in this room knows the~,c .-:oblcnt~. Why di~t t you come to us first like thi~ ix-:,, ~inaudil:le~ side. we would present something '~e."y :_:el?' and t.~en pr:see: : co the go,xl commissioner. but } u present it in., ',cry unfl~rtunate manner. A . ',ICE str. ::o,.,. ma:? iire commissioner meetings do ',, .~ attend or have '.,',u attended (inaudible)'? {.A..- plausc ~. A '. 51CE: Th: fir.- boa.,-rtl's been up here and they M'.: .a.: numerous :;mos. op..er, oublic meetings. Ilow many civic :ssociatinn mee:iaUs have you attended'? I 2 3 5 6 9 10 I1 12 13 14 lS 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 A '~ICE: Look. if 5,%u r-~ going to go to East Naples. 23 and z:,. them for a prop(,-..~, to ~i~udiblc) I think we're 24 ent,t,:C t,, kno~ aN, u: ::nat (inaudible). 25 over the fire control distriii. .. 6 G 1 {age~ 38 Now. what is the civic ass~x:iatitm itselF,~! It's basically to try to field in(poe(ant issues, disseminate them out. find out what the commumt? needs. ~cs and try to act together collectively. In essence what -- I've had nkq.ny convcrxatitm.s with (}ur civic a.ss~iati0n N~ard members and with regard to thc civic a.ss~'iation and thc fire N}ard. I have taken an extremely neutral position. I cannot be placed in thc position to sides or look at the issue from two side::. But in essence -- A VOICE: flnaudible). A VOICE: Plea.se. ma'am, let me finish. We. as stated earlier, need (ti look at another proposal because currently, we canm~t handle what ~c have now. It's very easy to drive down the street, drive by the fire department and you never even think an~htng going on. It is our resp()ttsihility to bring tltesd issues forward and not sit here and wait fi~r deliberati~,!tts. It would be .- it wuuld not be pr.act:ye ,m uur part to after your best i,tterest. And I can honestly tell you that the five people that are on this hoard are dedicated to nothing hut you fl)Iks here. A VOICE: Then why didn't you present it, to us'? A VOICE: sir. ! would have to ask you this Page 40 A vOICE: NO question about it. This has bc,~n on the board with this fire N)ard for thc la.st two m~mths. at least. A VOICE: It'S never been (inaudible}. (Inaudible). A VOICE: rhere was a public meeting at thc civic association (inaudibleL A VOICE That's cxactl} ~,,hat I was go{ present, lblks. A VOICE -- about a m,,nth ago. {fi recall. A ',,,'OICI{: I1'1 thc sunmtcr v. hen everybody ~a..~ gone. A VOICE: No. lqt). eh). It ,.vas a month (Inaudihlc~. A VOICE Yt)u knou,, s~mcthln.g, the civic did not take a position. They said continue thc way it is because we're not goin,e ti} ~t} for or again.st what's going on. and I think I'm sayi~lg it right. Am i'!Saying it right ¢inaudiblc}'.~ That's tile way {inaudiblcL And we've been doin~ this now -- none of us ~et pai.d. eve~'body undcrsta~tds, there's no payntcnt. Nobtxly'~ (inaudible} fortune here. All we're looking for is your protection. We are here to merely take care ¢ff!nlaking sure that ever?body is covered hy enough fire protection That's why {inaudible}. A VOICE. NO Otle'S {inaudiblcL We're just ~ ' saying. Gregory Court Reporting (9,"1)774--4414 Page 37 - page Public .xleetinl~ Multi.PageTM November 3. 1997 1o 1 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 2-:' 25 Page 4 i just let us know what ':,au're doing. ^ x ofcE where '.Yet: ',au in ~e I~t thr~e y~? I've ~n going m mma~s for ~c I~st ~ree y~. A ',OICE l'm ~ying ~rc.:~nt or ~ou'~ going :: z~nge our whole o~mtion , inaugiblc). A '. OICE Thc civic ~ssociation months ago - A ', OICE Excus~ mc a second. A '. OICE rime out. ~m:: out. time out. time out. We're not gzttin~ anywhere tonight, folks. ~t mej~l ~k ',.,u something. ~ mc ask you something. Y[ u ~: '~n raised and I · .~ha: ~¢me of ~e question. ~e? In o~er wor~s, to pursue some s()~ of a 7~oposal that's a little more finite so that ?ou can =tn look at it ~d study it a lirtlz 7~[ ~d ~cn come ~k at some later ~te ~d wu'Il v,)te E~ :D'body mist ~our ~ds ~[ ohjecLs to finding out m. :z uffo~atmn. OEo' Well ~en ~at's what ~e'll '&e'lI ~o. if that'~ what I 2 3 6 8 9 10 1 12 3 18 19 20 21 24 i. 6. G ,1 Cage respective staffs to put somemtng toge2'her that's, little more concrete. Then we can bring it to thc civic association, we can bring it back to thc fire h~rd and not until that's done will we vute a final vote limudible) county cornm:asmn D.cs everybody agree ~r ~ that'? (Applause.) A VOICE: Let's go home A vole*L John. can we hear from Ch,el Shank s~ that he could (inaudible). A VOICE. Hold on. Hold on. Hold it. h,ld it. A VOICE: tiold on. (Inaudiblet. A VOICE: tit)Id it. A VOICE: We need t,~ hear from Rose and A VOlCl-.: I'd like to hear from Ch~et Rodnguez!V'h,~t ' servece$ we're lacking here and what she can provMe us (Inaudible). (Inaudible}. A ¥OICE: we're just trying to keep up withigmwth. the manpower. That is the ,rely thing I seN is the manpower, and keeping up ~.eth the grog, th. hut as,you all know. growth pays for growth, but it's that la¢,k period where you go]to get the money in bcl'ore you c~n hire somebody else. Page 14 10 I1 12 13 la 7 8 9 20 21 23 24 25 Page 43 A ". OICE: SO it's a meaner uf getting more volunteers or more pai~: ,(inaudible). A '. OICE ~,'ell. it's m.n only the volunteers, butI ?ou n:..-d :o h.~ve ~omeb,xl.x Ul here. I mean. not just thc are v~dun:cers, but you n~c m have (inaudible}. ^ *, OICE. (Inaudible he here all the time. A ', OICE: who's eoinz to pay for it? Your taxes ~oin~ ro go up three tim]es (inaudible). (IEaudit,le~. A ',OICE I think we smould field that genfieman's quest;an (inaudibleL Etz's been up all night. A '.OICE: !'ve just got ;. couple more questions. My r~n,-', Joe ¢i~udible}. [' m a resident on the island. I have ~mall children gr.'~wmg up here. ~t: first question is. with the big development , inaucxble} you keep s. aymv_2 our responsibility. What type, :' fire protection are Wey going to have to build far tLz~ aver ~ere? Are ,..hey going to have {inaudible}. A '. OICE. It'S not the.Tn, sir. it's you. See. the Isle, .: Capri fire district; is a defined (inaudible). A '. O/CE: I understand amt. but they built all that develc?m., eat. Obviously. they're going to have to supply a fire protection for thc;se larger buildings, sky (inauAible) develop som.~thing like that. A '. OICE We will I AVOICE: We do. 2 A VOICE: Our district -- it's ,,ur district. 3 (Inaudihlel. 4 A VOICE ~lnaudiblel. You dem't need lo ge~ like 5 that. I pay taxes just like everybody else. oka? 6 l'm asking is they're gumg h, have to hulld a htggc~'and 7 better fire station (inaudible). 8 A VOICE: You will have to do it. 9 (Inaudible). 10 A VOICE: But that's going to ctmle ()ut of th~ impact 11 fees that now has bee)). I think, agreed upon. because 12 this fire deparuncnt has paid $2.500 fi)r a survey that ' 13 was done so that the new per.son that builds a home -- I 1-~ mean. it's kind of agaitLst my grain because I'm in the 15 building husit,ess, but I voted her the impact fees that the money would come into this fire district m take 16 17 care of that. We didn't have that heft}re. We flare it 18 no,,,,'. It isn't in force )'et. but ! don't know ho)w long 19 it's going to take to gcc tlmt so that ate monies!Will 20 come from building permits. 21 AVOICE: Sure. 22 (Inaudible). 23 A VOICE: I think fi)at gal also in thc comer there. 24 A VOICE: Not right away. not right aw:iy. 25 (Inaudible). ; Gregory Court Reporting (9-zi)774-4414 Page 4l - Page 44 Public Meeting; Multi-Page m November 3. 1997 Page 45 ~ ^ ', olcE: I didn't sa'. that. I didn't say that. 2 A . ;ICE. dnaudible} N.nw. my question to you as a 3 ae..':ur_,smner, do you ha~e :ne au~onty or do you know 4 ho'.~ :., go about redis~tming our area'? 5 ,a '. O~CE: That's {in---mdible) state law. 6 A · )ICE: The district was established by a vote, it 7 n~o/ ro be changed bx a vote. 8 A '.OICE: Vote O ^ '..DICE. The people with the district. lO A '. 31CE: ,inaudible,. Station (inaudible) which 11 yOU r. ive nn 951. v.'hal !s the manpower there'? 12 ^ '. 'DICE Three. miznmum two. 13 A '. DICE Minimu.'n la (I:...udible~. 5 A ,l~'[-. what :s the ?,'7'.ulation! Do you know what 16 that :, In that area.' 17 ^ '. DICE. No. I don'-.. It's growing every day. 8 I l.-..:udible,. ~9 ^ '. OtCE v,'c have ~Trr~fighters from eight in the 20 morn,,::g to eight ()'clock .:.t: night, a paramedic in here 21 from eight ,'clock at r::ght till eight o'cl,ck in the 22 23 ^ '. OICE. what ab~u~ firefighters? 24 A '. DICE NO. 25 ^ '. )ICE: No. it'S s'u?.r:n:mented with thc volunteers I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2.~ Page 46 at night. ]- ~ fi 1 A VOICE: Okay. (hu~udihle) volunteers {inaudible}. A VOICE: we have three wllunteers on thc island. A VOICE: On the island. Are they -- are they firefighters, certified tirefighters? A voicE: They have ammtmum of 56 h.u~ wilunteer. structure fire cenificati,n. A VOICE: DO they have any fire expcri~:nce? A VOICE: They've been here fin awhile. A VOICE: well. have they {inaudibleL Hage they participated in any practical linaudible). A VOICF.: YeS. riley have reslxmded to Ea.'~'t Naples. Marco Island. They have experience. I mean -- A VOICE: If we let the county take -vet A VOICE: well. sir linaudihle). A VOICE: The c.unty (inaudible). ^ VOICE: East Naples (inaudible). A VOICE. (Inaudiblcl c,unty take over,, they're going to have m hire linaudihle), so what,'s the difference'? A VOICE: We arc' c~mnty, sir. A VOICE: (lnaudihlc~. A VOICE: East Naples is an independem lire district. A VOICE: Yes. Page 47 I A · :rtL: we are coun:~. ,)kay, So what we're saying 2 or ~'.' thc advisoD' boa,el is saying is that they're 3 going :.) subc,ntract to a.a :ndependent fire department 4 '~b.:c?. , East Napic.,. but .ac .see county. We've alway,; 5 been ..)untv. t, ^ , )lek You mean F_,st Naples is not (inaudible). 7 ^'.DICE NO. sir. 8 A . )ICl . well. excuse, nte. h's not Collier County 9 govc.-..ment. It's -- inctznendcnt fire districts are 10 scpar'.': little mini gt)s r~lents. You've got Marco i~ Islan:. East Naples. N,:mh Naples. Golden Gate. 12 Imm' ~alee. Corkscre,o. :'inaudible). 13 A. 31CE ~inaudibie 14 A '. ')ICE That's an ration. 5 A · )ICE YOU can pa.', [Jle millage rate. You're 16 still i:z with ttae problem ,ff money if you do that. 7 A . ~CE: Conunission_~:. how big is the East Naples 18 co,er:;: area and v.'ou!d::': ..v,.: end up being merged into an 19 orgar_r, ation that has a rotc.eh larger coverage area7 20 ^ · ~lc;!: You can't be merged without your vote. 21 Reme-_:er. you'~e got - yo'.: ve got something that was 22 est^l::.: :ed by a '.otc of ',.he ?.'-:opic. by a referendum, and 23 tO ct'~_- :.2e the 24 you",: .2o[ (O 25 (inau-:ble). 9 I0 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 boundaries ~:r to do anything like that. 23 24 vote ag^fin er, do that. Nobody can fi)tee ! Page 48 A V()ICI:: I doll't understand how it v,'ork'q~then. If we're merged in with East Naples (inaudibleL A VOICE: Ntlbody's talking about merging. A VOICE: okay. ^VOICE Okay. A VOICI! tlkay. It' v,c're cmnracting East'Naples. do you still keep thc same c,vcrage area'! A VOICE Yes. sir. A VOICE Yeah. A VOICE. and we're not impacted -- W,e'll be impacted {inaudiblel fr.m Ibc same number of firefighters covering tw~ areas at the same time. A Vt)ICE Nil,. I dlink Chief Shank can correct nrc if I'm wrong, but hen plamung to staff this thing 2.1.bouts a day. A VOICE: EXCuse me. A VOICE: So we're going to lake some people from East Naples and (inaudible). A VOICE: I.et me try rtl explain some of my plan. (Inaudiblel. A vOICE: dnaudiblel I don't kmlw where lo begin. cover the boundaries .r millage or what. First of all. the b.undaries, it is true that Capri is respo~tsible for approximately one mile into Mai~tsail Drive, one mile into FiddlcrN Creek. East Naples has 99 Gregory Court Reporting O,,41)774-4414 Page 45 -Page 48 Public Meeting Multi. Pa,geTM November 3,, 1997 9 I0 12 3 6 7 I 20 21 22 23 24 25 I 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Page 49 .:.e,-cc:. of Fiddler's Cn:c~ We also have a large portion of .M~'.nsail. We ba. si'czdD have a three square mile camm; down 951 r,hat fo.' ,.':me crazy reason flo,~Ls over into C'.eirs. 9,':.;: ,, my plan for C:~."'~ after looking at the budget and v, tat's thc plan for C'.In:f Rodfiguez and the I~)pl¢ th_at a..-: her=. wc lcn~ked .a it and if you can vi.sx~diz~ like. I'= vistmlizlng, we ~.'we station 23 down on 951. I'm s~ing v, her: we acm:ally utilize two stations into one. ::' you ',','ill. ~3,-r. at I pla~l on doing :.. fight now I am staffed at 14 ~rsor.r. el maximum in Eas: Naples Fin: District. What I ,',ill d: :s move one of m? "-overs down here. which would I:',e on: per shift or thru. The remaining three would come :'yom t'.~'o of these pe,'m..)m plus one more. We think - v, hen: say I think, we ~wen't really looked at the budg~ real. real close We've got it. we've Teviewed and we feel comfc.-rable, at least at t~::, l'~fint, that we could hire Rtxln.z-~z. Mr. Butler and 7:ossibly one more to make tv.~ F.:rson shift. ^ '., OICE ttnaudibie somebody (inaudible). a '. OICE: ^bsolute]', A '. OICE. dnaud b e. A',OICE: That's rig..'m. I 2 3 9 I0 I1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 2O 21 22 2a 25 1 6 1 PageSO ^ VOICE: This is somewhat of a marriage protection, if you will. Like I say. I also. lin my district, have rcsporusibility on M~I Drive. With ~o ~opl: down he~. even ~ou~ I'm ~mg one Of my ~ple from my fir~ dis~6cL i~ ~11 ~so help sr~': a p~ of my dist~cL ~ ! don't f~l uncomfi~blb doing that. A VOICE. I unde~mnd ~t you ~id ~is w~4.- and Phil. I ~ink you ~de a r~lly gt~ point. ~ahthis -- you're In.krug for a Iong.te~ solution. ~ot a solution. A VOICE: Absolutely. A VOICE: unfo~nately, what I heard though (im~ible ) sho~-tc~n sOlUlton, a y~r. year and ~thalf (inaudible) shorn L A VOICE: dnaudible). A VOICE: I'd like to address that. A VOICE: The r~son for ~t -- ~e reason is~ ~at you don't know how ica going lo work. you don't know you're going to like it. AVOICE Exactly. ~ voice why do you want to do a ten year c.ngracF' A VOICE: Exactly. A VOICE: 'File point is, do a one year renewal -- A VOICE: d~udible} does the community. ~l~s E&sl Page 51 Napl~. who makes the (inaudibleI? A '.nICE: DO we ,.'otto' on it'? A :.nICE: well. I don': lcnow that you vote on it. but ycu cer',xinly gl','= your. input to me and l'm the one I~age 52 A VOICE: {Inaudible) economy (inaudible). A VOICE: {Inaudible) go on 24 hour shifts (inaudible). : A VOICE: 24 hour shifts. "' tlmt ,,.'tzs on it. so that's -- { mean. that's the way it work3 A '. nICE: {Inaudible. A '. nICE. ^nyways. O,.ut's primarily how I plan on staffir, g this if you all a~_,,'r, ee and it passes. A '. 91CE: llow is youz fire depamnent {inaudible) more ?eople'! I don't mnderstand (inaudible). A '.nICE I just told 7mu. I have 14 people on shift. )kay. I plan on ',,sing one of mine -- A . )ICE: RUt I'.O~, do ~,c-: get more money to pay them? Hov, can your budge~ ~e: higher than ours -- A ', OICE: They're alrv--.ady there. My people {inau.:ible.). ^ ', otcE: It's a larg.- :azxing base. They are a much large: district. ^ ', olcE: Their millage is higher. (Ir..?.udibleL a '. :)teE' I think her c.u.:.'zstion is. they're going to take '-ce mtmey that you're currently spending in operz:,ms here now. th-.'..' re going to take it and do the ope=eons, so they'll D. xe that much extra money. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2.: 25 A VOICE. anaudible ) potat ~n time if you decide to drop. you know. within a year .r whatever, what happens (inaudible). ^ voice You go back to what you hav~ ^ VOICE: tlaaudible ) but they were (inaudible). A VOICE: That will probably he written in the contract, it will go back to the way it was. A VOICE: The way it was. So either way. tl~y don" lose out? A VOICE: It won't be overnight though. It's gotta - we've gotta have time. if they -- if we decide as a community that we don't want to use East Naples b~cause of the problems or they decide they don't want us. (here will have to be a period of time of 90 or 120 day: (inaudible). A VOICE: Right. We just can't walk away from the table. A VOICE. They won't walk away from it and (inaudible). (Inaudible). ^ VOICE: {Inaudible) Mainsail and one mile Gregory Court Reporting 19t41)774-4414 Page 49- page Public .~leeting Multi.PageTM November 3.' 1997 I 2 3 .1 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2.1 25 Page 53i ,inau,=bleJ Fiddler and ~' ,: it t{} East Naples and keep the r~t (inaudihle~. ^', OlCE: That's an ration (inaudible) A '. ,')ICE: '9,'e h~ve thr~ questions going on at the same -.lme. A '. -~,'E: Hnaud~bl¢ a problem with that. believe me. A % OICE: well. would me tax increase be on the millage rate if we wan: m keep the station as it is? A '. ;.ICE That would ~a' ,u to be determined. [ don't belie', e we have those ..~umbers. ^ . )ICE we don't ha~ e :nose numbers at this point. Ym y,-. have to add - '.,'~,u ::.we to add now at least a 24 gout s":'t of two men ~,~ .-:u7:J:cate what ymFre doing. We only tap: two men nog =~at are really on the staff and that'~ -- A . ~ICE $240.'X)0. m '. OICE ^ ', ".)ICE A ', OICE A ', OICE befor:. A ', OICE: ^ ', "')ICE; Jus~ for twt, nmn per shift, it would be 1 2 3 6 7 8 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Two men -.,ar shift? That's six tie,pie. 20 lhat's '~h~:' Skip was trying m get at 22 ~.000 per :~rson. 24 dnaudible nave a hundred and 1 6 G 1 Vag (inaudiblel. A VOICE You've got about a 40 percent ~enefi package. AVOICE: 141. A VOICE: If that's what we have (inaudible) m point basically (inaudible). A VOICE: NOt available. Not after you take ~:.i not after you take (inaudible). A VORTE: YOU gotta pay more than (inaudible} (inaudible). ^ voicE: {Inaudible) about .8 mils. A VOICE: My point is. we don't have these we're all in here yelling, we don't know what the hell we're talking about. (Inaudible}. A VOICE: I'd like to address that. A VOICE: I can say this from being here., A VOICE: stand up and (inaudiblcl. A wm'L we've been here and gone through thisaand gone over it originally. We tried to put it tt)gc~er with what was going to be the best situation forI~,t}ur (inaudibleL I live here (inaudiblel. We talked to Marco. They didn't want any part of it. they didn't want any part of it. East Naples, at that time. wa.,; w{illing to sit and talk to us to put something together 1 6 7 8 9 I0 12 13 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 25 Page 55 Iinau-:ble~ not to the ~sis that we would have ¢inau_'ible~ V,: put CMef Rodnzu=:_ on a.s the ~ to mn ~e sho~ we asked for as mazy volunteers as would join us. We ar: now down - ~: :7~= says we have four. I don't ~o~ Cqat. but I'm j~gt ~c}llly~ lo say we need more voluE:cers in urder to m;akc our budget work. A '. OICE' A '. ')ICl(: willizz -- A '. OICE: dnaudibie 0udget. A '. OICE what ~s that_ budget? a '.O~CE what is :he budget'? A '. OICE: lai.~5 ~e5~ 25 iS what? A '. OICE: all righ=. I 2 3 4 5 That's ng:r.. I ! xnd we just uon't have the people that are 1o 13 14 15 A · -4rE..',:I nLh{ T~: what the amount of money that '.:.c have t,~tat t.) re.':;air thc trucks, fix the fire hydr~ts, do anything :mat has to be done. the air cond:::oning, anythicg ':nat has to be done. ^ '. -~tcE: so ho,.,, much income do we (itmudible) in taxes A 31CE $1-:1 ^ ~CE. ,~, total ,':' .al.000 (inaudible). A OICE: GroSs. A )ICE: Gross. Now You're making a mortgage 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Gregory Court Reporting (9,,:1)774-4414 Page 56 payment t}f S25.000. ~ A VOICE: For two more years. Htuudible! short (inaudible) 25.000. A VOICE: But that money isn't available ,May or tomorrow. A VOICE: 25.000 {inaudible). ~ A VOICE: I'd like to know frt)nt thc c,nmlis.4tmcr. how do we ,)rdcrly present to you folks to redistrict this thing, because obviously, when this thing was set up. those places were just grounds for birds, and obviously no one kn.wn better than you this demographic change, and [ think maybe someone needs to take a serious [$~)k at maybe re -- if l could -- could you get in yi?ur fire truck and I get in one here and could you beat me to Mainsail Drive distance-wise? I;t a VOICE I think there's a tenth ,ff a diffi:rencc between mv station and this one here. A VOICE All right. :,~ A 'volct.. And you got 1.1 peuple anti wc have th~iee -- two'? '1 A vOiCE A VOICE: How many (inaudible). , (lnaudibleL ; A VOICE: Well. one solution would be m go with cityhood. We could have the City of Isles of Capri. Page 53 - Page 56 Public .Meeting Multi-PageTM That 'aould take care ,r things. (lnaudiblel. ^ ', ')ICE: ,Ir.audible fire company. 5 6 7 8 9 I0 II 12 13 4 15 6 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 i0 11 12 13 4 5 6 7 19 20 21 22 25 Gregor.,, Page 57 That's all we need ~d have a larger ;me (inaudible). A \OICE: we're ope.': to that, believe me. ^ x OICE I think thi.- fine, distinguished lady needs to he addressed. A ', ':ICE. ,lr~udible options finaudible) options. ^ xOlCE, oh. my G, ^ x OICE: (Inaudible until (inaudible). A x OICE: Let'S field mis question here, folks. A \O1CE: Oh. all ri_c=nt. ^ x OICE. dnaudible ::ould the fire boards ~inaudible} options open :n us and the approximate cos and lee '.~ look at :t and c.,r== hack with some knowledge in .ur heads'.' A ', OICE Yes. A ',.)ICE ',Veil. we',': .'-ming tn have a meeting on Thurs'.?'evemng..mofficv, hoardmeetmg. Would you like t,: come there and p~mose MI these things so that ,~c co'_d close u~s re, cee:'.:' ~:nwn and come to our regular meeting, and if you want. like John Norris said. they'll table :: tbr awhile. Le:'s ..;..--c some of the people there. If you rblk.s feel a_s if ~.'e'7'.= doi~,g wrong, come in and tell u> '*'hat we'= doing ',.:'tong. If we're doing right. Page 59 A vOICE: I don't even :.Lllow where to start, l'm so mad =.ght now. Tlx3 infomtauon ttmt' ~. ~en given out co you. the public ,inaudible~ you for the last three or four months. I can': sleep. My blotM pressure gets up. and it's became a lot of it is a bumzh of lies. Your safety's in danger ~nd that's ~maudlbi=: to rny commission, which is mx. ckain ot command. They ask the questions, l'm open and honest. They nerd t.) know that. 1'11 a.as';wer your questions. I'm not here t > start trouble w~ut: people, but my life is in danger linaudible~ answering your calls. '¢,-r.:n I say >our life'.: m danger right now. if you have: ;ax accidrr, t on 95. linaudihlc) all that's going to go :: that Huh: red tru.:x. (inaudible). Thank God for th: paramedi:s, becau.~= (itraudible) decide we need the la'as of Lif.' if you'r: trapped in a car. rather than the a'~:oma:ic ~inaudibte: we used to have that was cance;.-.:, you ~av.~ :o wan ~.mother 15 or 20 minutes now for tl~e :.l~s of Ltl': to she~ ':p from East Naples er Marco Islanc~, That's a long Un'ne. To :.he peopl~. !inaudiN:-:~ feel sorry for. because uSer:',, :iremar. r. zt c,:m:zz itnaudiblc). We don't have a ho.,,: to reach the bacx of the condo back there. '['herr s a lot ,ff safer',' :~.,:;ues. In the daytime, if Court Reporting (9,-,11)774-4414 I 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 I0 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 IO I1 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 November 3, ! 997 1. 6 G 1 Pag - s then listen to what we have to say. ^ voicE: I don't believe anybody thinks you're doing wrong or trying to sneak anything through here. A VOICE: Exactly. A VOICE: I think the feelings an: hard for the fact that wc didn't know thc problem existed. All at once 'we find out. hell. we're losing our st^finn. ! mean -- A VOICE: The station is not being lost. ii;, A voice well. that's thc tmpre.,is~on everyb~nly he, re got. A VOICE: Sure. and I think - A VOICE: I can understand tlmt. becatt,;e people do things that are against the law and they don!t evel realize it's again.st the law. but that's no excuse:, tley. i'm not trTing to put you down. A VOICE: No. you all -- if yt)u all would bart5 just come nut in ~omc way and sent a letter to everyb~xly said (inaudible). ; A V(}ICE; we haven't got the money for the postage. We're in the hole. (Inaudible). A VOICE: I have one gentleman thai would like address it. ttc'~ a long-time mctnhcr of thc wflunteers of this, some 16 years. Billy Segota(phoneticL: (Applause.) ,,. A VOICE: A VOICE: A VOICE: A VOICE. A VOICE: (inaudible) pagers (inaudible). page 60 there's a firefighter here. you have a 50~50 chance that (inaudible). At night, you have a 50150 chance (inaudible ) tv,,, voluntcer~ that hve on thc ~sland th;it are going to respond to your fire calls at night, and (inaudible ) he here another two ht)ur~ ,;o you've gtR :one volunteer that nlight be a firefighter that might ~ all EMT. If he's mit an EMT and he's a firefighter If you go with East Naples lire deparm~ent, you're going m be saving my life because I'm going by mys~ilf It) a structure fire. l'm not going ti) have a backup to sil there and try and do the things that need to be done to save yt)ur life and your property. A VOICE: Ht)w many times (inaudible) all)ne? A vOICE Alone? We just had one the other night we didn't have any firefighters go to. We had a first responder that went (inaudible) firefightcrs coming from East Naples v. hich was (inaudible) volunteer firefighters A VOICE (Inaudible). (Inaudible). ~' HOW long (inaudible). / Pardon? th)w long was that response time'? That response time. that was three Page 57 - P{ge 60 Public .Meetina Multi-PageTM November 3; 1997 1 2 3 .1 5 '7 8 9 l0 2 3 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 2~ 25 Page 61 ^ '.,)lc~.: I m~n. ho,., rang (ittaudible} East Naples I I ¢inauJible) . 2 A ', OICE That wa..S -- the first truck was there witbir, I'd say ten min~'u:s. That's a h)ng time forl (inaudibte~ burning. 5 A',OWE dnaudibie 6 A '. ,')ICl! I.ct me fir, isa. Do yOU want tile rest of 7 th: ~ .umzzrs that still '~,:trl< here? [ think you ought 8 to listen to them bccau.qe ] - after al'king to them. we 9 MI f~: ,qlt~rz xat'zr going ';: a professimbal paid fire 10 ~Tar'==:n: from '.~t'.at =e ~'.-:"ve right now. (lnaudiblel My 1 life's :n danger and I d,'ln't feel comfortable 12 ~inauJible). (ATplause.) 14 ^ '.olcl ,Inaudible~ '.'m'nught up that the advis.ry 15 board ;,now's ab,m ix than :i~mudiblc) m)t right, and a 16 lot o! '~e t)thzr '.olunte-c~ gan hack me up on that, and 117 I'm n': her: to (hr(,.* q,3n=s and I'm not here t, eau.<1 18 prohl.-=::s. I want a ruler, mn and I want a safe ,,oludon 19 (inauz:.ble.j. 20 .Asr the ()thee v,)lur:.:=-.:rs that are here tonight. 121 A '.OICf! I think .,.au 'rash that ,'inaudible) having a ]22 FrcN,~. '.,.e need ?our ."..~::' m the cummunity iinaudible). [23 A ..JICL I think that'. ,.,,hat they're trying to do. 2a /[z.:udible). 25 6 1 ~ Page62 ^ VOICE: could we hear from CI,ris Middlebn~k (phoneticL who used m ~ the chief here lbr yeats. A VOIC[ well. I've got a couple ()fquc~n(nt~. I want to ~y une thing. Bill's ~n a long-time friend mine. but I disagree with him. On ~at palm true fire flut we had. I did respond along ~th an,,ther v.luntecr paramedic capture and ~th a par~cdic captain ~at w~s (m duty. and from (tie time t~t we got thc call. I'm not sure Bill is aware ol this. we did ha~c t~,) pages ~at were wlthlll t)llc mlliule , were (m scene r'r,m thc first page. until we wctc called on scene. Wl~lll three mmute~, and lhal's d.cumcI~led · e trip ticket that -- becau~ I w~x cm~ccmed about that myself. S- we got there quicker than we tb-ugl,. It was .nly a pahn tree fire. and we did get:there in three minutes, nut in ten minutes. I've gm some quesdmts fl~r Chief Shank and al~ Diane. I kn.~ a li~tle bit aNmt prou~ol .t c,ycra~'c. Diane. [ think provides -- no one hm~ menti,ncd ~is. but wc pruvidc (i~udiblc~ fl~r a fircfighmr u, ~ here from eight in the re,ming until eight in the evening. From eight in the evening umil eight in thc mt)ming. Diane provides to us. at n, c,st t, us. a parmcdic wh. is or ~ll ~ or is setting school Io ~ certified fircfighter, state certified. Some ,~' her 7 8 9 0 I 2 3 4 19 20 21 22 24 Page 63 ~opl:. and she can tell ~. are already basic 56 hours [ 1 cert/r:.rd. 2 %~,: :o ha~e ad~aacec'.=c ~upp,matlcast 12hoursa } 3 day. :-.d then we re:Iv u~:m the respondin~ firefighter n,~c. ,,ash firer:.'~,,er ..r~,, :unnv the da>x~me, plus the t 5 ami:)u;i.-.ce ser',.icc b%t com--' lrom either March or East 6 Napl::. but we do h2ve amvm;ced life support in the eveni:.2, and I think most ,f our calls (inaudiblc~ are 8 probably mt;re medical than fire. A',OICE: Correct. IO A '. OlCE 8¢) percent' ' I 1 A '. OlCE .,bout 80 :percent. 12 A '.ulC[ ):ires ar.- xe.--' few. Thc codes have been ? 3 so g{*.,2 lately. Pr ~ple aah:zring to the cotmtruction ' 14 sun~r:.s, we ~.ardl~ ever :=we any fires (in.audible) I 15 think ,~r've had maybe fi.:,-= or six boat fires and maybel one re~.structure:!rc..ar;cz was Pelican Bend. which we 17 did a great j()b ,m. I kav,z to say. X . .I,'L wha: a~c:: > :.z- garage, does that cuunt as 19 a rea: srmctur'~ :ire? '20 A , 5tee we::. 'ac grt,~ir,Ny haven'i had more ~an a 21 doze.':. 5res. a '. o~cE: D,) y,~u hav,: (inaudible) here'? A',9~CE Mr? N,, A . ~lCl! '.vhat'~ L% Fmma~ respmrsibility of Page 64 fire department (inaudible). (Inaudihlc~. A VOICL: Primary rcsponsibilit.,, ts to pa,vide protection, emergency service protection, and that f'all~ under medical '<trices. tbr a first rcsp,,nder I.'MI I thillk that'~ ~h., IBOre Po,rte are c,)Itcertls.'d medical as orr.seal to lire. which b, a conccmJ but medical i~ a big thing, but Diane lil~udiblc} and pays h,r because we are pan .I C.Ilicr CoUnt> Emergency Sc~ ~cc~. tt pays for a pardmcd~c here 12 h,mrs a day. n, cost Ici yoU. A Volt'Il wait a minute. Our ~xcs arc paying for EMS A VOl(Th that's right. A VOICE can I clarify'? I think Commissioner Nnms has ~atd :hat at tomorrow's mcctltlg fha[ he 15' lltR going t,~ take any action, that he's going come hack t. }ou with those oplimts and eval~le )'our cu~=nt 5=~'icc. which is your current ~e~ice b~cd on .79 m:b. ~at generates about 5140.(~1 m ~.x lnt)n~) ~>' other optiun will jus~ be using that stone ~)t of money or pcr~,ap~ ~crea~lllg yOtl're going Naples District. which is that 1.5 mils at th~ current millage rate. but Gregory Court Reporting (9--:1)7744414 Page 61- page6.1 Public 5Ieeting Multi. PageTM November 3. 1997 2 3 7 8 9 10 1 2 13 15 16 17 19 20 2: 22 23 24 25 7 8 9 10 12 15 16 17 18 .2'5 Page 65 mat Cemmissioner Nome nas indicated that he is going to. at '.:.: board mceung..":.z.':mmend that we get together. look ar th: opfon.,; and =hmn come back to you 'all with 'me 'vaF. Ot.kS oplIo,"~S, but :,' czanfy what Mr Middlehrm)k is saying, you r~=i,.'e 24 ~murs of coverage. The first 12 hours are with a fir~fi~_nter or a firefighter I~cr. and the sec.md 12 hours co'.'e.-a_z=_ ts either with a paramedic. ba,;ic firefigNcr, state :=rtified. a paramedic, fully cenifi.--x:l firefighter and ~he vast majority of the par^re=dies arc. if they hav,:n't attended at lea.st the basic zourse, they're a~-q.e, nding it. Sc, ~gain. that's whza ':tour sec'ice level is today, that those pe,ple are as::ugned Itl the Isles of Capri distri.:, th:'/ ~inaudible, ~Sastrict tin. audiblel district. th:':' r.-'~pond to it. but ;e.'-,.ainly tinaudible) that ynu'll xmk t,', lc.ad the discuision tomorrow in just looking at thc va'i.us .pti,ms tho: are available. A vOICE Diane. car. I ask you a question? A \nICE There's a .question in the back. A '. OIC[. /u.st mi: qu=-.,mon I'd like to ask from the Nx~rd. Being you'r: goir. g' to propose some kind of an eptmn to [sic', of Capri. -.~v:: don't want to just go with an open chzckbcxek bc-'~..atzwz we've done that and we're S20J~',) overdrawn no'.~ I .ucn't }:new where we're headed now ::' ~.e ~2c, ',,.'mb,mt sore.- ~=md of knowledge of-- we're 1 2 4, 5 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Page 67 A x OICE: Exactly 1 A \ OICI!: I tn:an, tluI All(lie^les that you Can't do 2 it you:self, and that's a =oumy c.mmission policy 3 decisi,' n which could ~ :'-rover';ed at any time. and that param.-2ic could be taken out of here. I mean. that's a 5 possib:iity. T'herz's noth,.mg ~ys that has to be done. 6 Righ[ .-.()w. thc county's ~,in~ that because this district can't c,)vcr re_self 24 homes a day. A ', ')ICE Mr. Nt~rris.: think it's a great idea It) 9 exphlr: other t)ption.s. ] mnnk somehcvdy mentioned 10 W:lckznhut. v. hich dial's ^tot a gotxt mune to say -- I 1 A '~ nICE: 'that was jtust a joke. 12 A x ©ICE: Isn't there :mother privatization firm'? 13 ^ ',,~Ic~: .wain I ttnrm it -- the direction we're headir, g. which is ct) de'.'/eh)p -- A ', OICE TO ctmside.'-' all options? I think that 16 would ~'c the }'<st thin~ t,: do. is consider all options. 17 but I c.) have a question ::ne' Chief Shank. and this is 18 re.car,::=,' :f in lac: :t v, erg :; E. aqt Naple~ and they were I9 takinc .ar: of us. Milch I' m sure they would do a great' 20 )ob. ) .,. ment:ur, ed ~fore :27,~t statmn 23 and our station were going to be con3ide."~'_d as one responding unit. 22 A\OICE: Right. 23 A ', nICE. which me^ms if you get a call in East 2-~ Napl=: '~,hat happen.s to tour men here in (inaudible). 25 ~ U(.l' r' ] ,: Page 66 going to have to pay ~r our coverage. Dv~s is not goiug to ~ able to cover us and th;.: rest of the cnunty pay the bill. I would like m know :what thc budget ~s going to be s,, flxat we know We kn,,wi~e can't go above a point and a half with East Naples. That's the maximum we can go. and that possihls' -- at this point. J,hn. at this point rlo~. we stay where we for at least two years, at least tw. ),ears -- a voter, v.u have to vt,lc t~, chan~e y, mr millage. A VOICE: I understand that. hlhn. I understand that. but. you know. if it becomes a fire emergency. John. v, hat do ymt do? Call that - carl the board it and say we have to pay -- no? Then who cm,'ers the cost uf this it' -- A VolCl.. A question from the gendcntan there its th, striped shirt, tle's been trying fur some time. ^ voice dnaudible) paramedic at night (inaudible). A VOICE c.uld you speak up'? ^ vOICE: tlnaudible) go in it' there's a lire. they respond finaudible) fire crock'.' a vOICE: I.ct me point ,ut that [hat re;dR illustrates, gives you a hint ~t you have a pmNem here. because the county ms dcpamncut is suh~idizine your fire sen'ice here tm Isle ,~' ('opel 12 h,urs a ~y. Page 68 A vol(-r~ N~. What I'm trying t, qy is that fl~e -- right now. when I ~y to combine them. my officer s~tion 23 w.uld ~so be working with this AVOtCE okay. A VOICE F~r supervision. A V~,ICE ,Immdiblc} convcrsatitm on the ~cleplnmc. you told mc that. person from here ~mlld be to thc ~ti,n 2Ys call in East Naplc~ I)i~trict. Il you Md a call m East Naples smtim~ 23 district, you said you're going t,~ have a three man linaudiblck a vO{CE. I1' we have a structure fire. I w.uld expect them t,} respond, sure. A vOICE, only on st~cturc fires t inaudible}. A vole[ sure. unless we're all tied up. and ~at's no different than what you've got n,,x~ A VOICE How many calls did ~tation 23 ha~ in '96 (inaudible>. A VOICE why is that relevant th~mgh'.' (Inaudiblc~. A VOICF Chris. why is it relevant, bet^usc still have to have a fire dcpa~cnt tn ca~c you ha~c per century. I mean. it's not relevant. h~re. A VOICE I'm just bringing out a p,,int · at if you do pull someone from here hob,re they tO a call in East Naples -- Gregory Court Reporting t9,~1)774-4414 Page 65 - Page 68 Public .% leetin~, Multi-Page I 2 3 5 6 7 9 10 1 1" 1.3 17 19 2O 2-:' :5 Page 69 ^ vOICE: Marco lsl:.zmd will move up here. ^ vOiCE: >4arco Isl--.~]d (inaudible). (Inaudiblel. A ~.,)ICE GOt a -- got .~ verbal commimmnt from Mar,:, a vcr~ai t;olnl'Blh"Ile.~ [rom Marco to clfflllflUe what we're doing, automatic inaudible). A ',OICI5 St) Marco i",a.:. /inaudible) m protect u.s. A '. ';ICE '.H':at t.,hey ',,-o=a! say is - right when I had talked :,) thc chief. Don..v-- said at Ica.st to the bridge. So it '.~ould b-= close, ngi':.t, if this place was -- this station ,,vas ~'inaudiblc~ I lnaudible :. A ', OICF. I llav~ a quos/mn, something that came la. st w.-.zk that concerns mc.. and I only want what's for ~: island, v.'hatev-:r rev' sea.son is, but I tried to call ~: ~tatio,n her~. and 'ntis i~, what concern.,, mc. I ir/cd t., ;.all thc s/a/mn tot like four hours/mc day. and nc,'x~y an.',wer~ h.-:'=- and there was no recording. What :s the p,licy~ A '' DICE I can ans'~ ~.e.- that. A; DICE I mean. :, 'a.d .,,'t~u -- A '.,~ICL All our firzS'..b"ntrrs are not requirt'd to be. her: '~.r, en :/ney'r,- on s.=::: because they have hytlranl mata2~nce T~,cF ~u lu ~=,uJud~ble) pcmn.sula, check out th: bu:idings th:r:. Th.-'. also work on the boat. So r~ N.vembe~.3, 1997 2 [, ~ 1 ~ .[Page70 I they're not IleCcs.,;3/ily -- they don't have to be h~re. 2 but they have t. be within thc district. They all carry 3 pagers. They have their radios, so if there isia call. · ~ they're guing to get timed -ut. $ ^voice ~lnaudiblcl. 6 A VOICI". Right. Thc?re goinL,, I. dial Ol I. We ? don't -- ~ ^ vOICE }]ut it' wc call thc stati.n, it's '~ unusual not to get an.,.' answer here'! Il) A V(di'l. ',.ifrlctlines there ts Y-u could d, i!,c I 1 with East Naples sometimes. They cmfid bc training at 12 statimt 21. i/ltd H,body will answer the phone at station ~:) 23. I[ Marc, Island's training with us. lhcy have 14 secretaries at d~cir sm/ion, but in th~ subs/ad}ms like ()f teaS,lng, dlcrc's not g<)i,g t, ~ ;lllyh~tlyi~;il that 17 S~llOll. hUl that doesn't Ill,an IIicy [all'l l~pOlld lo call. because they are in thc district and~!hcy will rcsp.nd bcL'aU~c we arc activated directly by ~11: with pagers. A ~'t~If'l Yeah. that gcntlcman'~ had IIi~ hand up. A VtHcI ~ir. my t~nEs ~i~mudiblc} ,m th~ i~land 2a (Imudiblc ~ lire and rescue also. {h~udibl~ v~hicl~ accidents, which they do haw a lot oL they do .- might 9 o 2 3 4 5 7 18 19 20 23 24 25 Page 71 not M.: a lot of fir.-'s, hm they do -- it only takes one I good .':.re. and that's a:,: it takes. 2 T'r.:y're talking to ?u~: two grays here full time. 3 2.1',.:~. ,.?u kn,.* Tbev'~.e .,ready explained that ti) y:)u 4 l inau,:ible~. Okay. ~nzy're BLS. okay. basic life i 5 ~u?per The ameulance: .~ .':¢~ming from Marco. they're [ 6 comte.; :'r~m 1.:. e:tt',e: ~a? They're nut looking t:) take 7 this 5. re dep:'-rrmenr to .'m~m 24 hours, to be able tol '~ an_s~:: phone calls and h=tn the public, okay. and fi~r mu:ua :ed :.~:rc::=ents. g t..~) department for East Naples [~'; to .:o linaudible} up to East ,Naples. Marco sends a unit, ;'er her.~ automar:czally. It's a mutual aid a~ee=:nt v.'e .".ave lt'~ aN.;ays been there. It's always that 'aa,,' I'inaudiblex That's all. (Inaudible). A ',.DICE l like that. (A?plause. ~ A '. DJ'CE. [ have sommthing to say. A '. OleE: I think we sh,~uld field this last question and t~.en I'd like to finisln it off for the evening. pleas:. A '. )ICE: It's a comm.--:,.Jt a.s well as a question. I v, as a~'adible~ -,nd I ~.~r.k ~' '":~ speaking for. you know. for al! '.'oluntezrs who ~ia. you know, belong to this depar_-.:nt (i~d:ble~ '.c '2'.2 department, but there were . lO II 12 13 14 15 16 18 19 20 21 22 23 2.~ Page 72 a lot of things going tm in this dcparmtent that should not have been. ;md dlis will all sn)p il [a~t Naplc~ rakes over. I know firsthand. ~al wa~ one of thc teasings -- I'm ,,t t~i,g to ~i,audiblcl di,) 'laund~. but ti~udihlc). I mcan. there arc pc,pie that arc not certified hcrc that should be certified. East Naples ~lling to d~, thN li~mudiblcl pc,pie I m~'ai~. I w~x -- I w~s asked quite a lkw times to attend thc rcspond~r's cl:t~s. I was declined three lilllC~. I kn,w ~'hs. I didn't ask why. (Inaudiblc~ Nox~. l'm ;maid I'm spcaki,~ Ii, a lot o~ · at are hcrc iH this room. I don't kn, ss il raise their hand or n,t. but linaudiblc~. AVOICE dnaudiblc}. A V(H('I.. .lll.~udlhlc ) ~:dulRccr i::;a~l,hblc~ ~l[re w~r~ a ]l)[ of thillgS w~ln Oil that ilh)tlld lh;l ]l;t~e A VOICE what? A VOICE A h)t. (Inaudible}. A VoICI2. I don't think we should ,tart going fol~. Nox~. liqcn, w~'re ID, king at thy high'z: issue here. ~c issue here is that we're resin? t,~upplcmen: and add additit,~d fire protccti,n c-~rra~'c t0 our isles at the sa~ ~'~sts h~r~. A VOICE dnaudiblc) problem (inaudiblcL Gregory Court Reporting 19~1)774-4414 i'agc or), Page 7: Public Meeting Multi-PageTM Noven]l>er .... 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 II 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 23 25 Page 73 ^ ~ olcl-:: .N'o. we do mt:i: have adequate coverage at th:s time. ma'am. It is v=-5.', very subjective, and if .xou folks think we have i:. you don't have all rite facts. 0'~ m:.~u.tes from our m~s ar~ public. They may be ob~.aine.,J' at any ttme from o'.h- secretary. I strongly urge .',ou foXs to c(nne (,n in a."lc ;ti d~}wn and review them and bo:em.' educated with wir~ nur problems and issues are. For us to sit her:: for a on.-hr}ur period of time and try to ingzst information into -- you can't take it in all ch,rog~'. hut again. ,mr fir-': ~mard has w.rked very hard to tr',' tn ~d supplemental s,_---'-vices to you people in the coman'..x:-'ty at a reaso.'tabie .::mt and we're doing it all for ~: sa.m: intzr~st of ongoing. Iong-leml remedy fire prot.~c:/on, and for that.: tlmnk you all for your time. (Applause). (End of tapcl. Gregory Court Reporting (9¢A1)774-4414 Page 73 - Page 7~ ISI.E ¢)F ('APRI FIRE AND I,~KS('I i-; I)IS'I II1("1 SPF.(~IAL MEETIN(; MINt 'I'ES N,~cmht.'m' 14. 1997 m Ed Hucgcl N'Ir lhlc?Cl cxphllnCJ lit,.: ic;ISUn h. Ih,.: nl~,.zlln~ ~;l~ ;llXUll I '.~.n. .;.. ('hlcl 1{.drlX.ic/ prep;ired cover.ge Thc cls~cf nl~- sl;d~d hc to. Id .ol ;dli~rd I. hxc hcr~ h,r Ihv u.,ncx hc ~s;~ m.k~ng riot ~orkmng in Ibm% %lltl;lllOfl bCC;lllS~ (~[ IlIc l;IN d.lh,r~ 'l'h~' ;lll%Xx~r b~ IIn~ %lltl;Jll()ll ;mccorcJHtg lo CI.cf Rodrigticz ts Io r;nsc thc Hnll;t~ or re-fin;meed Iht fir;' %t;lllOfl '[ h;d ,~ nor ;sllox~cd ;md Nh I In~cl docs do~fl'l x~ork ;ind i[ Mnl~lhHtg cls~ I~ b~'llcr Ih:il ~;m hu fried .~1 lln~ Ilnlc Xlr Ih,k'~,.'l .l~Cn~'tJ thc Mr C';irlcr .~mmlh rend Ihu fidlox'.lnl., pcllll(;n '~'k' Iht mtd,.'r'.q.'ncd ch, herd,? i)cIiIlUtl Ih~ or Colhcr C'OUnl~ 1o dolor Ibc mnllcr of mJn~fcrrm~ Ih~ opcr;Hl(m ol tls.' fire (J~'p;ulul~m AI prcscm ~t~ ~rccnl of Ill~ cmcr~cnc) c;Hl~ ;d Iht Isle ol ('nprl F~rc J)Cl~:Jrlmcul nrc r~(lUC~l lot medic;ti cmcrgcnc~cs Iht rcm;tinning 2(f% nrc fir~ c,,,crgcnc,c~ ('lc;~rk our prm~.t~ nccd m. hu cmsmcr~cnc~ HIUtJI~;IJ Fmrc Prmccl~o~m Ass(~;HlOlm'S si;md;rural opcr;mng proc~dnrc~ rYq~mm~ lh.I ,m I~., ~m~dm~mdH:ml I]lk' liF. hlm~ fi~hlcr~ ;irc sl;lllOllCd ()lllsmdc Ibc slrnClnrC No~ Iht Isle of (';mpr~ x~mll ncxcr bc .hie Ip fircF]~lncrs on d.l) 24 hours pcr d:,x. scxcn d;~x~ ;, ~cck. ~..11 ds;mi ~. ncccs~;~r~ It, Nil II[1 il lire ho.sc .dcqnnlcl? In Iht cxcnl of ;~ fire cmcrgcuc}, on Ilk' I~lc ol (';u~r~ ~l~Xt~lxnU2 ;~ tmrnnm ~l~u~lHrc Iht fircfighlcrs nlong xsuh Iht ;isslfit311cc or Iht Irmmng ~ohmlccr~ A~ s~)",, o1' thc cmcr~cu;'zc~ nrc mcthc';d rcqncsl, x~c do ilol X~;llll Io Ch;lll~ Iht cx~sl~n~ upcr;tlmn ;d Iht Iqc ~1 (';q~rl. H;,mch :md I~NIS xclnclc nmi Scxcr;l[ issHgs Ih~ll IleCd ;HlClillOll oH Iht Isle of ('npn tllll ~C d(, IIt,I h,l', ~ ;111~ I~%11~ Ih;il rcqmrc ;I second cl;~ss one. Ih;il will bc off isl;Hld, chmmn;Hc onr oxxn Ii~u bu.~rd Ih.il In,cd lho~c nmmd conlrOl of opcralions of our fire dCD;IFIIHCmll Io ;mnolhcr ~OlllllllllllllC~ I'mr¢ d~p;ffllHc~H ;Hind Ih;Il fire dcpilmllClll dcxolcs ils fidl cml~'r~) lu lho%' {1 ~c}xc~ :md {{umn ~l.~h mi rccc]xc~ si, duc COIIIpCIIS;IIIOI% Thc cil{zcns of Ih~ isle of (':q~rm .re' I'.lh c:q~:dq~ o{ ~tdXlll? Iht pn,hlcm~ die properly oxvncrs oF Iclc of Capri Mr (';trlcr ~11111Ii Nilld hc x~;l~ ilpl IC;tLI~ h~ prc~cnl Ilo:lid IIIIIiJ Jlc [ccclvcs SOlllC ;Iddiliol~;IJ illrOflll;lllOlJ Ed l'{.¢gcl ~:lnlC:d Ih(~.'.;c In :Hlclld;Incc Io knov,. ;~! Iht I:p..l nlCL'lmg \II h,hn N(,111. Ich Ih;il IsMS nol Ic;ivc Ilns fire SI;Ill(HI ('Il;Ill'Ill;liT \%';1oJ%c% M,lhJ(J IJtC J~I~;~[(J (~J ( ~'nlHI~. ('()lllllllN~l~lll.'l~ IIl",,fr~J.h.'iJ J ~.'~, ~ I_Jj, h, '.IH~J', m% ~fJl{,Jt J')rgJ')()~,;lJ'., tlc J~.'ll lhl% ~'.~.dd tic ;I ~l~l,(J IIIIIC ti) Jcl J.L'(I km~%', Ill.' pill,.'! kll2~'~lh,H. Ih.' '.'~,llJ~ III 1'. I, I~C [~oJ'~ ,~Jl:lllk ~;l% ;l%~.~(J fl, Jllll ,ill IIIJ'~rlll;IJ jlrup~.~,;IJ hcJur~ IIic .lll/~'ll. lhl~ i~h,jl,,~,~l ~,1~ ,1~ HLiJ,~.' ;Il IJl~' C;lllll()l ~1%C ;I dcJ~lilll%~J ;litterer '[ JliJr~' ;ir,.J ill;ill% s,,Jr~ ILL' rcJ;tlc(.J I~llC~ Ih;il ;irc iJ(~l JO COI11111~lll I ~ ~llcll ;~ ',',hid h;lIlj')Clt% %l,.'n lhv tilL'fib IJ I:.',l~ . th.' I'.l. I,, ,re.uti ;1'~ ~(l(,ll ;1~ ~llll~lllc)ll~ :irc '~(ir~.~(I ¢ltlJ dh(.t ,lllk~C[ k ,It.' l',,tll,lhJ, ih.", ~lJJ J).' lil~'.,~lll.'Lt Jh.l. '%~.'Jc Phil Pop(v,, ic..~ ;~k~.'(I ~lmt nrc thy ('Jll¢~ ~p(Jrl~tf~/ Fc;id lJl,~ J'()Jl(P.~lll'.J ¢llic'~h¢~ll~ Ih;It ~¢l,J J'~r',:~,..'lll .Il Ibc IllCCllli:: I:,,.l~.'cn J ;i.,I %.lJ~J,J'. :Uld J'pr ~" Illll ~J'~,JCl~lc IllJ'(irlll, lllIHI ~Jll hcIT~ [L;I%I 'NJI;ll¢% ',',Ill I',,: ,fid. h, r.dll,,...,~'.l~ IlS (,Ih.I ;IrCJI Ill oJ' (";ltlrl hlld~l¢l Iii rC(JllCk~ Il) Ill;IJ,C III} Ill,.' Ill(,llC~ Itl(IrC OJ'ICII IllldCt IJ]~l[ J)F(~D,)~jIJ JNJk'k Of' ('tit)ri rC~ldClll~ ,mi.' .nrruml~ pr,,~ ' ' 4 E;lSl ,~;ij)Jc~; SI;IIL2~ IJl~J'., IIllClld h, II<',Ch.II) ;I ~¢lhllll,,j,,,:l i~r,.,;.*f~tlll 'Jhulr inU,,lUU,, I~h,:rl:llti dish;reded E;I$1 ,~;IpJ¢~ Il:tS II~) ¢',,j)¢rlcnc¢ ill lll;llt;l~lll~ ;I ~l~.'C'¢~,~l'Itl ~.l;n~ric'J't.'.~u. l)f~,pr:lrtj J Jl~'tr In,liars,.' pro.t.:r;ml IItlJl/L'd ;I tfo,,¢rcr;d'l :Uld ~,;l~ CJlllllll;Itk~d dtl,,: It) (.J;III~L'I(.HI% (lJ)~'l'; t i~ . Ed }{llf~¢J SII,~CSI.~¢I Toll1 (';Iflrl(')ll ;11i%%~r f.,(HtlC eli' IJI,JS¢ iltl,.:~ltull~ ;t'~ lie {,. J':t,t %nl',J,', ('J,;llIIli.,ll (~l' tilL' ,'~(J~IsO~ J~O;Ird ,%,Jr (';illf1(111 sl;Itc(.J Ih,.: v,;i,, lh~' f11;l(JL' Ibc Jll(}j'h}~;I] ~;I, Ili. KL' Is.l, h.l,,'d {HI Ih. J';iCIS Isle ()J' (';II)fl ',',Ill J)f,.Th;lJ'~J? rL'.~Cl~,,.' In',.'(HllL' IJll~ ',,C;il {d ~1.1,; {UlIJ h, \J~.4 ~lll~ V,. h,,,k th;it ~ J..J'2.fttlil lt.) .~ J..J~.JMJtJ 2111(] J)lJICCd ,.,ut hli{.lz'.cl ;It '~ Il;Il %~C Ih¢lllVlll ~' ~,tll,{ (,I),'l.ll. I.J. ,,l ( ,ii)Ii still h;11`¢ Ihcs¢ c',pcnscs i1' Ihc~. ¢(mtr;~¢'l 1`~,llh i1~, I'lll I';,irl1` ~-~uld~rl;fhlc ~llh ~mf li~m'~;,, h;l%~'d t~Jll ~sl~.l)()rl Fs;I) 111¢111 Ol1 tile tr'lK.~,,. 1,%0 I;IClOr iii ;ill r,f II.,,.c I'~u~lr~:~, HIT ',I,II h.lx~ ,1%lllllhl,s tll ~s';, ~,llll I'l)l Ih~: IIIlk11(3%~h 1`'~,.¢ III;D, b~2 III1~,',111~ bcuc~l CoSl" ~'[1~11 Ihc~ .l(llll Iht I1111Oll nil I[1c~ ~clcct Io.lo111 I]1C IIIIiOll [hL'~ CCI thc ~;llllL' I1c'lIC[~l~ ;1nd [~;151 N;Iplcsju~l did ~(llllCllllllfl Ill lilt ];l~l II0~ hlr~ E;I$1 Nnple~ .llllllp~d Oll Ih;Il (1pllOrlllllll} ;llld Ii~n~ Ill~l~;id (~f [~;1~111~ $1;11C fircFl~hler ~tll[llll I]1~ ~1;11~ r~llr~lllOlll l)hm Ih;il ~l;l~ dl~¢ll~d ;11 Iht llrc~ IiIIl~ iI1~1111~ [rlHll Io %J411tl ;I p~fsOll. ;llf I1;ICkS ;irc dollnrs (.)llL~,llOll From %~,h()se btld~C.'l d~,~ Ih,,.' b(i;ll ~\l)~11',,~.% k2OJtl~ Ii~Hii [¢[lnlrk II1,11111,,;Ih111~.¢. ~.(lll,,,idCrlll~ Ih~.' ~,[:~OI. docs I]1¢ bo;Il co%er SllCh ;I ];Ir~c xnr~cl%, thc% h;ac b,:cn ~;dlvd I I~hv~ ;dl Ih.' ~&:~ m N;~plc~ ;md m (';iprl blldgcl ~thcll Ihc~ co%er such ;i I,rgc :lrc;i Anf, v, er ~lr Wo(~l~1` - ('olhcr (/0111111` lite %;1~,1 ;IfOlllld I]11% I~l;Ind. Iht ~l;llC['~ ;]rou~Id N1;Irco ;llld (ioodl;md [hcll l~lc (Ic[).lrlltlciiI % i)llt~ c(l&cl thc I.ind h;l~C x~llcrc Ihc~ c;lll ~cl ;i IruCk ()~Jr rCSCl[C llo;11 i~ I~r Ihc' ix;tier ;ir~;i '] h.' i~.'L~lfl.. ;Il I)f~IrlCI t )Jij Ih;d ;irc IlOl u.dcr F~rc ;fl~o p;i} Ad L';dorcm, I;~xc~ fi~r I]rc cxl~llllg ~ro d~p;ll~mClll~ ;llld Ih;il In% lll(~lle~ i~ ~l~;~rcLt scnlcc Phil Pol~lcl - Th;inks IO I[IO hell: ::r porl rml P;ir;llll~dIC'~ ,,\lD.%~¢r . E1`cr,,orlc rcrcr,, lo E,".IS ;llld II I~, re;ill% list [':flier?eib.% .'~,:f'x I~'x J)cl],lrlmeliI ;llld J% c'()tllj~rl%~d C). ucstion - Wh;ll ~ollld tlc Ih¢ logic bchln..I t:ll.,lllp ;n~;l~ ;t I'.lr.liIic(ll,." .\",'~kk [:H - 1 (h,i I Illlllk %%~.. ;irc s~1.~ Ills liml. 1`~.h;ll v~'¢ ;ire ~l}lug is rlghl llo~ ~c h;~%¢ IIc,.'ll ;i,,k,.'d I..i ;ill;il% ~,l... Ih.' i)rupo,,:d Ih;il [:;l',l Naplc., h;iv¢ prcs¢lllcd ;llld %~c IH¢I 'allh E;ISI N;l['~lcs h~d;l~ for Iht I'lr,,I flirt,; ;in(i %,.c ;ir.' Ir%ill:. I- ~cl ;lll',~,.~'r,, ;llld ;Iddilioli;ll illl'Orlll.'lllOll IO nssurc Ih:Il [11 ;i I11111111111111 Ihnl Iht cllr~c~H Ic~ cl td ',ct,. i,..' i, I~n,. id.'d 16G 1 ¢.111``~.11o1~ \VII;II I- Ill..' h,:'l, hchIIhJ Ilu'. ' [)1;111~2 FI:III \Vt ;ir,,: (IIHIII2 ;I FIre (?l:.Jkllr,H I.Ill'.J' ~ '.1% Im~',l(JC '.,,.'r'.l~.~ .ir i~1', ~,lh~.l I'll. I1,,11... ,Jml il !h.', n..,,HilllrrT.d v,h.H d,),~', II IlL,k.: If II , E',I',,I \;Iplc,, o~ I,,I~ ,,f ( i~)l;llh~ F I,IL'L' - V',.' .If.; C'.;Ihl;Itlll,, Iii.' ~,l).l,llhlli,. ;l:';llll'..~ l'flu (' OIIllli,'lll from l]l~ Fit.ir I ',,,iHlItJ Iii... iT ~l;itd'~,..d ',~h.'u }t",l"; :'.'l..~ .,,Il II,,IH h.r. N',h. II .IIci ~J Iii```' [)l.lll. ! I,IL'L' - ~l,(I ~ill fl.'~, lC',~, IIh.' (,i~r ~lhUl~ r.,l~tl :lllil '~',. ',',ill .lli..,,~..I 1]1. ~lu..ll ,i~ lb.'Ii ('OIIltll``lll ft(Hii IIl~ Jlo(~r - I Ih(,ll~ll~ ~,~.. ',xcr`` Jl~.'r..' h, ,t~...',~-, L~llt o'~li ,.t.~' illIli.lir ,'pcx;HhUl..' ( .ill ~C h,lujl£our (l~`'ll j)tobl``llIC~ [ x~ol~h.J hl.u [od``f'lll~.~ufi o,,~u d.'p, lrllli.'lll ~ll~J h,II,~,,,, Ih..w. mI.~ [~,Ob '~h,lllk - ~\',uIId like Icl ;l¢l{.Jt¢'..'. ",Olll~' tlr Iht (lllC',lh~fl.. ' ~'.l',l \.qq.- h.~. u,, . xp.'~.'u.. Iii Ilhlll.l~fft~ ;l MI.~C~'%I'III III;IFIIIC i'iro.12r;llll '['h.:r~' IIl,lrlllC i}l(~f;lIii IIII]l/CLI .1 ~J,,ll:.I``rOll. I~Jl``f;III,,HI., J llC``tJ ~'JIJJUIII;III J'~(IJlJ ";IIIIc~, II ~;1'. ;In ~[(.] Ihncr~.l.~ll .lib[ II `'~,l~ d,lllL',.'lUll- ~,\. h,ld IJ,~ Id.,d. hh,',~ ~,11 ,,11 lin h ~',,l~ll I (ill`` Ill !ilL' hick (ff cxj)¢rlcuo..'d [1ct~jll`` I h,iN,j [~IJN..'UlI~, j4 .~.IlllL'd dlk.' r,:,.~.Cl, tJl`'.f. Ill liP, d.:F),li'llllClll ()Il till[ ;lJIJ);I[;llll'., lh.;uul? thlup',t`` ~',uuh. J h;~',Clolc;Itlt III ",out dl',lll. I I" u. hui.'th~",',,,tur~.~.:~...,,uhl hd,.. u,. I,],,u ' ',,,;nil tJ~,,I lo b.~ IlllNIIITIJcr%tJ~ld Ih;il Il T~;I~, J/k',..;Ill'.,`` ~,,,. tJ;lllL'k'h~ll- ,.~r I11\ ilur.,,,rul.'~ ~.'r. ~J,IIIL'Cf()IIN Ih. Il ',', l'. Ill``.' r.;.l.,oll ~c dui ;re;r, `'NIIIi ~.ulr JJo~,cfcj-;iJ'l (,)tlc~,lllJli Jh,N~ III.ill \'OIIIIIICCr J~ro~r;llll - II N;n,, liCIt ['~;ikl \;IplC', ',t;ll,.', Iht`' Illl,.'lld h, d,.~,:h,I) ,~ ilft,.,f.llll IIN'~f pi. Nitlil~, pr().,_',';lln ',N;i,, dlNh;lildcd \Vt Jl;l~,..' Iii ?~, Ix~ck t``u `'c,u. ,uz',, Ih. '~,Illlll...i. ~.','.l.'fll,, Ii;i,., ,,.Jl.lll,..,.~ Ifptll ~.',ll;ll *)ii".,, 0J' I1~ ;irt: I1~,~ IJ~ Iii) II,~FIJi I j) Iluflh Iii.' '~{dllIll.'ci ph".'[.llll ~,',;1', ,I ',CI', Jll~,-.I. Ii',, -flhlJJ COIIIllillllll? {)F~';llll/;lJl(lll `",IIcI',,~ (~'~k.'l'~tiJJ~' CLiI)i)CF;iIc(J Ill IJlC IIII~.ILJJ.' ,~,fi · ',~C JI,F.] ,I `'OJIIIIJccl JII~,L'; IIII. J ~;1'~ ;I p;Irl OF Ih;Il J)rcl~f;llIi ;1% `'~cJJ ;1'~ Mci",, oJ' (HiI J}oqd. ~``.'ru .iJ,,u .\'. ,Ull ,,Jl~lll~.l L'IC',', T',C ,ill :'~1 JllrCd Tod;r, lo pul ~,OhllllCcr.~. II i~; diFll~.'u]l. C~.lX..clull? dllrlll,_, Iii.. (I,n J `'``lllll,_, h,mt,. :ir,.' iud I,~ thffl.uh .',.~, IJl¢ Ul;i. iarll? `'~cr¢ lured oH. lhc olhcr,~ Io,.I UllCrc,.,I l]l;d iN `'~l,, ~l,u i~,,:~L",, ,hq,:,.,k.d \\ c h;~N .. ,, Inlln,`' nc~ FircFi.uhfcr i'CCFIIIIS, p;Ir;lltiCdic rc(.rtlll~. CUIIIIIIL' IIIIu Il,,' IL'Id ~llJl fl~, ~NIi~.'i., tu ,,.,ti "NJ,, I~.l``d iN ItT c;Ipll;Ih/c Oil Ih:It. Ihc~ nccd ;I I'¢NillllC `'~h:ll :l holler pInL'~: h, .'-'ct CXl)¢fl``ll~.`` Ihnn I,, ~.(~lll,.' h, Ih`` fire dcp;tFllncnl, mid ill r¢llIrll ~;'c ~cl lo .'~c¢ ~',luJl ].iud oJ i``olcUlUll j)~.'lNiqlll..J ~`'~.. h;i,,c 'Ih;il iN Jl,.l`',. ~,,.,... lulcnd build ;! ~olu,lccr [Iro~r;llll Mot;il I~, uccdcd lo bulh ;, `'ululllCcr J~ru.'_'l;llll J ~,(,,,Id hL.. i,, ,...l`' our dcp;IrllllClll IS licit lo help I need In I;ikc Ibp, Io Ill', Ix,,itd 'Nolu ~.OlllnlUUll`' uccdN to ~.'.¢1 tu:'clh~.r lo NCC ~`'Jl;ll ~,(lll h;iNc ;ind ~h;ll '~ou ',`';llll Yuu \fill h:,Nc Il,. l..Ic ,,I ( ,Jpll FiN' l)~p. lttlllcnl Il N~,: ~.~,llh ill ~l `'`'iii still be isle or C..':tpl, I [:Irc [}cp;irllllC'lll J)l:lll,,,.' Aii,.J J ss. Ill '..'(,llllltlh.' I¢~ I~,~,J', ;~1 lUHIII',,..'I', ~lJl(t ".'...'C ','. hill '.'st.' O';lit ("')l~¢SIJoII Jf;ll'lcr OliC sc;il' F.;iSl N;Ipl¢,. CollJdll'l in;in;ipc ~,.llh 'ss. hill Ih,.:', hm,.c or ~1 v,¢ do.'l '..;sro I.r thc scr"s icc. v,h;ll ,a. ill h;Jppcn Ih¢ll (.'h;lirlll;lll \VooJsc'.. Il iN .ol In Ibc dr;ti] pl,op~,u..;~J Illll Jt~.' ','.uuld uu;iptu~: v, liCll IJlc I'lu;~J ;Irl;lll.t~Cl.Clil,, ;irc itl'.lde, there v. cHiJ~J b¢ ;i rc;Fg(~ll;ihJ¢ ;JlllOllllJ (ir lit}liCe rClJlllrk'~.l I111 bl~lh ".Id.:', hi (,.)I:CSlIoI1 IrE;Ill ."',;iq'der, c:m't ;llTnrd v.(m](l ',.m~ l,;.~c Illlllc;Juc" ('Jl;iJrlll;lll t, VooJ.gc.,, '[o r;il%¢ IJlR illlJJi2;ij2c l'Cljtilrc% ;I r~JJt:r,,:l~t. Jf.]~ ;i ', oft i[i Iht.. (Jf.-,IriL. I ('OlUlllcnt .'VJ;I.~b~ ,,'.~: Jl',.:cd Io t.c).lC .p V, llh %(..,,.' I'U-',...:'. I. h,.: '.,itl '.HJli,..Icul .~;~',,h..' IhL' lulk', ',~t~.ld SOlllCIhill.U, Io Ihillk ;Ib()lll ;Iii ;IJlRl'll;lllVC [:'hil J'"op(IvJcl ~Jr Och~,. nl;r, bc ,,mi could ;[ddrc'..,, ,,(mit.' .I Ill,,; ,'Uld;l[[~.t: ,.tJu h;l%k.' bet:ii ,~l%.t.'ll Il,,, Iht: (..'oilier f..'Olllll;, [J¢);lrd ¢)J- J['(llllllllf',SlOIt¢l,'.. s.., lilt r,.'g;.rd Mr Leo Ochs Thc [Jo;ird o1" ('m.[].s,,m.cr,, d[rc,.:lcd Iht ('lulul's .'\duuul'.,Ir:tl.r ~'sl,, I ',,.urk dll,.:gIl,, I~r. lO JUI'-.¢ OII1' .SI;Ir[ Sll dos,\ll '.~,ilh ~;1~1 I%;IJ)J¢~, ;llld 'sl~ll! ."kd\l~,Hr~ ~l),li't.! Il, ;.,~,l'k Olll ~1 prl~l).',;]l Ill IIli'OJl~J! IJl¢ iI.lllJ')ers, ;ind e\.;llll;lle lJlc Je',.¢l or-sc'ri'lC..' bcln.L' i)ri~pl-,cd., ..'r',..". Iht ,,.Hrl'Clll J¢',¢l (~£ ',ch ICC ;llld COllie back It':. Ih¢lll %~.llh Ih;Il ~.;lJll:IllOll 'Fh¢', II;l\k.' Il(il (Il[Ct.lCd .11 lhl. J'h)llll Ih;Il ',lC '..'\Jihtl,C ;IhcrlUlll'~.'cs bill JJl¢lr pi'llll;li~, ob.j¢CIl',.~j It IJlc~. h;l'sC ill~'C~JIc(I (Jill ',l.llJ It, c\;iJ;I;ll¥ Ill,.' j)l'ojlt.'...;ll Ih;Il broughl forv, ard b', E;tsl N;iplcs. ;.rd COllie b;ick ~\llh Illl(Iflll;llliHI till Ih;il prul)O,,;d 'iht.". \'sill ;r..',c",.'. Ih;il. ;llld s.,.iJl delcrlilllu.: ',..lull IS III lll~2 ~"t~SJ IlllCrCsl OI[CSIJo[1 %VII;II oilier ;IJlcr[I;lll',. ¢'g do ¥,¢ JI;I',.C'~ X'~r. Leo Ochs Thc.\ Imvc oplcd ;il Ihis pollll Io h;l's.'c ~.l;]l'J' dtrccl ;lllt.'l]lu~ll o]1 tJl~ prt~j>c,,,;ll [~ob SCh;lllk Il" IJ~erc i~, ;lll's olhcr cj.eSll¢)llS I ~;111 ;Jll~.%~.t.'['~ ()liCSlions. Ir E;pq Naples J:ir¢ see Joes'; J re;id i~ IJlk: p;qx:r v. Jv.:r¢ Ih¢% (lid illd Ii;l'...J C'lltulph ilitql¢\ .',,)1111[I.~ ill LEo Ochs' I do nol h;l',¢ ;iccess lo E;isl ."'~:q'~lc,, bud~¢l III iii[ ()111 TOIli (.';11111(111: E;.';I .~:lplCs I~i VC~ .'-;Ol".¢llJ ,'\ II¢'~",l);ll'l.Jr ;IlliCit ,q ItlOlllh'., ;t~t~ '.'.C '.\crc JoJ)klll~2 ;11 d¢lllOlJOllS bCC;lllSC s/,.¢ il;Id ] driver Cllg, lllCcrs Ih;Il ~.~..2r~' I1[)1 J)crJol'llllll~ IJl,J hlll,.:llUll (il ;i drl\,.:r .Jil~2111ccr They were rcccivlllg driver ¢[iL4in¢¢r pa) \Vi ~.'.¢r¢ I;llklll[2. ;IbOlll dqlllOll.p Ihl~,¢ i'~,,.'ol)lc %0 :s.c ¢o. ld ?,;1%¢ so[uc dislrict ,lo.ex Wc ;irc :[.diled cxcg )car b% ;m ludcpc.dc[ll (' [' ,.\ flr.] m N:]plcs. Ih¢ rcsllll~ arc S¢lll Io 111¢ OITIccr Ge.oral. Ihe Co.nb Clel,k. ;md arc ~cn ~uh c.I f).r b.dpCl prc,,cnll? I~ '~ 7 milho.. xv¢ h;Iv¢ o.llincd otlr r.l.r¢ gro\slh, wc h;Ixe ;dl .cxt tcluclcs t~c h;t~c ;ll)j)rUX~l.;Hcl~ (, .ullm. m a~cls. ;llld ;l~lll SI(Iii.il(iii iii c;ir~' forty;ltd I wo.ld cmJ~sdcr Ih;Il xcrx hoJ~c.I Bob .~cll;luk: Thc ~v;iv I ~c il. is xvc ;irc bolh going lu re:rko Iml )cC;uts~: I Is:nc ;]1~. picked ][1'~ 't pcuplc I. ]l¢Ip o~,1 my side. \Vo. ld bc ;ill :lddcd b¢11¢111 Io bolh 1 J~tIZl~lllcf"., Ih;Il ~,ll hc 'd;Itllmc(I Oll l',lc ul ( ;ij)l'l \¥c c;Icll IHi~¢ lClili(~\ ull ul '~'~l Ih;il ~c h;r,,.' prcliC'Cl YOtl Jl;l~.l~ p;lrt utr ,%I;lul~;lll ;lli(I ~',c h;l~C p;irl (il kJ;llll,..;llJ ~,',c h;l\., ill~,l',iJ., hl~ltlc j),uJ..,, ~,li '~.'~l T,I(Jl;IJ ',',c ;ir~ J(.}{iklli.L, ;11 I',, IJl~,~ ft,,.o I['llckF,. oll ;i lll;Ip.H lllCId,~lll. (.HIJ', IlhlJ,,~r. Il IJl,.'i'~' I', ;I i'll',.' ~11 J',,J,' OJ' ('npn. Ih;il IrllCk Ol1 ~t;lll()ll "1'~ '.~hich ~', ;~l '.l::,l ;,nd X1;m~,l¢c ~nthl .illhHIi.lll,..;lJl~, ~,,,l~,ml I~ Ihl'.. d. Jl'.lflCI C'hl¢l' f~.od l~,odrlL~uc/ Wc h;l',c ;~ ,Nlulu;ll ,",Id A~zrcclll,...'lll J)cl'~',¢Cll ;ill lit.' I'llC dcp;JXlU,cnl,, hul Ibc', (].,'lll'l for ~;ist .~;ipJcs (~r !,J;ll~rk Ihcx v.~,uld L'Jotl .~cJl;lll~,; '[ hcr~., i'., ;~ tJ~Jl~rcn~.c hct~..~n N1HIti;iJ Aid ;ItJ(J ,\uhHtl;lll,. A,i(I \~,JJ,..n ~.' h;i',~.' ;~ lire In ()11r J'rOlll (-}llici" (Jl~l[ICl,., ~¥licii J JI;I~,L: ;I I'fr',;' J (l()ll I Jlc~ll;if... I(, IiIiiIL' %.(lllh '.,ipJc'., Ilih, lip, (.JI'.,IIILI ~¥Jh.'ll J Jl;l'~f~ ;I J'li'O ;Il IJll~, 'zIId ('Ii' IJIR dlr,,IrlCl, i CJ(HI'I JIC~,II;IIC I~l Jl[lll:' *',J;ll',.u IJ J II~'L'JJ Ih,. Ill J Il;il ', ;111 ,lllhlllhlllC IIl()~ Iii) '~llll '..JUnlJ(! I)~' ;fhJc l~J JhlllrJJ,.. ,I ',I/It~IIIIC Ill,. ',~Ill~,uJJ IlllllJ Jl ~cIk I(J .J J)~HIII ',',JlcIJZ Il', Jl'z.~llld Jlk;JJ). O1' ~()11 111;I~, h~l'~ ;I L;IJJ I'.hcr~.' il', JllJJ~, ~n~(~h,'(J '~uJ JNl~,.z lu '~,.tHl". ;JJllllll Jh~' JUUI'~C II,.'\l Th;Il"., 'n hcrc ~(m nccd c,,lr;i Iicil) (".)llC~,ll(')ll Il Iht ~,1111;iI1()11 ',',er.~ here. ',~nl ~.uHld kjlJJ clHtJ..' h~ hulp' ('(llllfll(:lll '~¥h;ll Il '~',~.' II;I'~C ()Itc ~ll.~ Jh.;r,; ;llld ~,',C C;IJJ Itff thrc,.'. (u ~' Jl;l~ ~.. lille,.' ~fl', '.. h,.'r¢ ;Hid ',t~.' c;IJ] ('Ollllll~lll ~,~,:C II:I',C ('~JIJ', Jl;Id (It*c ~,lrll,..Itlr;iJ J'lr,,.' Iii Ilia' II~¢(.Jl.(.;;l[ iI~, I1()1 Ibc J'lrL' J-i~zJlllll~ is~,ll,.' ~,',u IicL'd I()c(Hi.,.clllr;ll~.' ('h;lfrm;[n ~,~,u(d,,c% .Al fhf~. ntcclt,l.,_, Ih,' lire li.'_'hl[[[~ [,,il..' [,. Ih,' unl', [-..u,' \k,..,re l.,Ik[u:, I';f,.' th,,Irfcl. [)l;)rlc [] J:l;i~,.,..:' - ,",Jr k\'t~,~l~;c,,, thc (')pcr.xirun,, J).Cl)url i)h,x itl~'d I)~ ('IH,I ICt,thrL, u.,. i., h.r,,'d ,,lrl~.ll~ ()Il I~rc prol~clrcHi. ;llitl IlUl l!,Nl~ (.)lib,,lit)Il %¥h;Jl i- ~tllJIp Io h;lJ)J"¢ll %',Jl~.'ll 'Fiddler', ( rc~'J.. ,..t)rll~',, ill' \% Jiu ',',ill L'cl Ih;ii ' [:~Ob Sch:lnk ')ii".;, ~ll! Ix: [;.;ISl N;Iplc',. ;I i)()rlmn ~lll hc i,,Ic ul( :lprl ~,ob Sch;IJIk (k~ldcn (kllc P;]rk~;r, £rt)rn .~;ltll;I ['~;IrJl;lI';I IU ;urp~rl l'(~;l~.l I', ;..lu;~ll'. I'!:l,,l ",;~l~lc,. (Jl',Irlcl Jllll (ulJ~ :lClll;IJb, ') l?lllJl~ (1[ ;I diF[crcncc J)cll'.,,hZll Jill',, F,I;IIItHI ;lll(.J .till! ",l;lll~ll 'I hCl¢ I', ;~ qq Inll..' ;tll(J Jl~.'~lll' Sl'~¢d Jllllll b¢l'~',Ccl! lJllf~ Slflll(')ll ;lll(.J ',',C Jl;l', ¢ ;I .klr:ll~hl ',,h(~l hill ,,,,,,..' ;Irc ,l~ ;nl;~l)J,.' ;mil c;m h,,: ul' h~.'ll) Phil Pol':~o'vicl - I ',',(mid like I(~ r¢llcr;~l¢. [?,,[c, ,..,iJI}l.flclu,..np' u, Ul~l llr,.' pr~m.',.ll(~n '"l'uu Inu,.,l ~cnicfut',¢r IIOI ill lite bll.%illCS~, (.1/' j)l;Icill~ J'~l'~.' J)r(~I¢CIi(lll IIIL.'~, h;l'~C P;H;lltlCdl~.', .'~d'~:lllC¢'d J.lh..' ~lfl)l)~rt I,, ;I t,~(lndcrrlil Ihln~ lu Jl;p,c. ;lltd I don'[ think ;in',Oll¢ in Ihl,, jl. llljjj v, llt~ ~uuld hl.,c lu ',c...' lit;il dlniJnl.,h 16G 1 .~¢r¥1cc.~, ill liICl ;llld IL.f'~ ;ll'~(i HIsitrc Ih;ll .t,,, ? hm,.c Iht ~t(l(.Jlll(lll~;I illk.'dl,;ll ~Cl",. I~.,.~, From Ih(. floor: X()",;, orour cnlls our mcdicnl Phil F'opovlci - Our III;llld;llc sir. IS J]rc [)rotCCll(lll Chief Rod RodriFuc/ FIddlcrs('rcek llllhcX1mn,,;HI;uc;t o~r dislncl ;ib(m~ ~l~ million doll;irs Th;ll's Iht [:lddlcr~ ('reck c~n~lon Ih;il ~c ~lll co~cr phl~ our Isle. or Capri Thc illlp;icI ICC% ~111 ~l~c I1% t)lll III IU')6. Isle of (-._';tprl It;Id sc'~.ciiICCll ~,nhlltlCcr\ Itl Iht dcpnrhtl.':nl ()ill ul fhc ',,c;L.lll.'.'cll '~,ohinl¢¢p,. ~lX tlr Ihosc ~ohmlccrs ',.'crc /~l'p,-sl\ honr ~,Iruc. ftmdl', c. crlllicd hmr ~'..".1'I '-, ;md tmc I'~r~,l rc,,p.ndcr Nov, Ill IUU7 t~,C h;I.'.c ;I I¢)1;11 ro.r htllldrcd he)Hr\ r,,.o JilcrC';lS¢d ~lS Ih(. II'flllllll~ Il;l% ~()llC o11..'~.t, ;iJ%(i Jlil~,C )llllll~zer L'II;',, ;11 Ill( ",i)IIIL' IIIIIC '~.'C JNI~C ;I i'llJ:lllOI1 JlerC '"/Oll ",~,lJJ ;iJ',..';l'~ ~, Jl;l',. C ;i roi;Ill(Ill (il '.llJlllllk:L'r~, ~¥~J ;lJ'.,tl Il;I; L' ;111 ;I; CI;I?.C rL'%JltHl(J IIIll',.' Ill (llll (JI",JlIcl oJ'lJirc.c. I(I J'Ollr IlttltllfCS Th;il I~, licit ['~,I.~ fhl'., I~, Mrtcll; ottr I'lrc dcll;iilltlcll! 'J Itt'., I\ ;',h;ll .'~.c ;irc .'.'Ol'klllg ,..'Jill Jim,,. ;llld il %tllllCOllt; RIsc bCllcr scr',lCC J CltCtHtr;l~,C Ii ;llld JJlc P;if;llllCdic~, bill Ih;H I',, ,JLll~alJ, Ill') In IJlc J]¢~;ll(J t)J II"tHllllll',,~,liUlcl,, ;lll(J Iht ('~HIIll; .,\tllllllll',Jr;llOf .':c;Ithcr lilt', v,;Itq Itl CllltllttltC COIIICS III (')ucr.,lion - This ,:']ucsllon iF; lo ,",,ir Ocli'., Yon h;t;u buell Itl;tll(I;ifctJ Io h,t,~.. ;11 fltl', i~;ulx,'.,;ll t'~ Ibc I~(i;ll'CJ o[ C'Oillll',. ('OlllllJlS~l(lllCfS. ",~Jl;IJ Illip;ICl Oll .'Olli' fCCtlllllllCli(J;lllOII Itl IJlC .dlllllil',",ltlllCl", ',.'III till/ IIIIJl;IL.I Jl;l~,C II' 1..'C ;.';llll lO I;Ikc. IHHC ;Hid lOOk ;II cffJlL'i' OJ)lllltHl%" [.il ;irk.' ~,'.C ',',n~llil~ (uff IiIHC'~ ~Jr. L¢¢) Ochs - [ d(m'l Ihnlk ~nu ;irc ',.':lSlltt~, .',olir Intro. dc\irc to Ii;Ivc olhcr OpllOnS. ~o/l'l CJl;lll~C IJlc dlrccIiOll iii;lit( AdnHnistr;llor In IJle Do;lid We ;IrC gOJIIg lo COIIIIIIIIC lo d,, Iht ;lll;ll~xl~ ~tll~lllll (~llr I~n(hllp~ ;llUJ r~collllllRlld;lllOli~ h) file ('OllllJ~ AdlllllllSlr;llo~ ;lil(J Jlc ~ iii l;ikc IlIcm Io IJic (~qlnl~ ('Olllllllk~l(lllC[~ Will IJiC~. IIICJlldC Otlf oJl~.,cr'~;lllOll~., ih;il JilL' ~.oflllllllllll; I,, Jl~,l ;IJkHll IJll'," ,",ir Leo Ochs I cnn onl~ nl;ik¢ 1hose I~J),,cr~:tllon,, Itl lilt Ix,;trd I h.'llc~c Iht ;11 Ibc propos;ll ;llld IJlCrC ;IrC rc;llk (illJ~ I~o cJclllClllh ~Jl;ll i~ Ibc u~,~l ,llld ~hal ~ Iht Ic~cl uf ~cnlcc [:.d }(llCgCJ: ~,Vc ;Irc. ,,.mir Fire Ad',l',or~ [),o;ird ;Hid ',;ill ,;:OnllnUC lu I',c c', ,.'u ii Iht ( orHlnl'.,'.,ioi)cr ~;1'~ ;c~ It) Ibis [)r(:)pos;ll ' ' (.)ltCSllOIl: II' I h;I;C ;I fire oil Pon or Prince. I ;1111 pt,lit.,_, fo c;lll (';tprl fhc~ ;~ ill lltO~c ul'l Iht IsJnntl If J h;IvC ;l hc;irl ;ill;ich Oli J~orl of [)rlncc. ~(111 ~lll %J:l~ (ill lilt I~hllld ] Jlc~ ollJ~ Jllll.' (',ll)ll ~lll iIiO~c tip i~ ir J ~ould h;ivc ;I l~rc itl Iht souIJlCrll ;l[c;i. ;lll(J Ihcrc ;irc IIOJ th:ti lll;Iil~ JclT P;igc' Bob..~ou did ;tgrcc ?ou ~;.uld Ii;nc ntorc iltO\c tip,, Ih;tn Ih,.'h.' :il,: ctlllCltll,, R,phf" Bob Schmlk: ,Mo~c up's ;;onld hc For slruciur¢ r~rc~, ~,¥hcIi lip, :,.I;lllUii i~ Cmpl}. I doll'l cnll ('hi)ri 16G bL'C;HIS¢ I h;Id I? r~;l',`.~ll,, III Ip.` ;Ir',,;;t `.', h~, I Itccdcd Jell' P;Igc OI thc ',ckcn hundrcd c;dh Ih;Il .`(m Il:id [3ob ,~ch;Ink ¥,'h;ll J m I~tlt,g Io ~,;l',, ]',, Ih;il [ h;~',c ;I ~4rucltfrc ['~r~.' I m L',)Jm' m c:Jll (';il)ri iii1 Ill Ills' southern ;)rca If 1 ll4c(] Iii.', ¢1i)4111¢ ;d M;iIi()il t!2'~ I~) ~t!lJ il~ I"..lllc'.,tt,d.,c It.mtm(..k v, hh,:h I ',',Ill (Icl .. ih;l! side. [ `.;llt ;iNk (*;Iprl Io rllOVC lip If;dr Ed }lu¢~cl [;(.'b. If ~ou II;Id (*.prl nm~c ill;, ,.% Im ,`~(luld I:~t.,c m ct her.' `.~-uld ~.lz II.~ ~.' M;lrco" ofl:~ Im~hl bc ;~1~ [:.MIT ;md one could hc. i".r~m~c(hc u?hl" Bob $ch;ulk Wc ll;l~e [);Ir;nncdlc,, mid E\l'r's iii ~lllr dcp;~rlUh.:nl ,nM in ',dm¢l hill Iht ~lr¢ rlol S;IIICI IOIlCd ('()lhcr Di;Inc Fl;igg: TITM, person is prun;irll.,, rc'gpon,,lhlc fnr mcdJc;ll InIcrxcnll,n I.'nl :ll,,~ .r,',l,.I Iht, mc;t I'or lire fighllitg I Ihliik Ibc po)Ill Iht ('bier ~`.;i~ If',.lll~ I(~ Ill;)kC carlic~ Ill hl~ t)i.'cr;lIl¢lt,, fk.'l)(,l! i~, thC Ill)ill)lit)Ill of I`.',(I ;llld I'cIICr;lll? Circe Ir;Ii)lCd prol'c~,l(lli,lI,, ,h'ri.`J ;11 ,I Iii.' pr~qnpll`. ~,`llh ;iii {c~cl of fire sen icc ('Of)lille)il .~0 I{ ~,`lll bc belier bcc;iu,,c ~ou ,adl h:l`.c: poi,id., h,:r. `.ti., .ir. ,,I,iI...'flllicd lir,:li:'hl..r., :)lid ,r 'i ,\ [ ' r" N ;llld ~,f. tllr [~;ir;lllicdlc `.`.iii hc )):'.hi trill Iht dc). rmhcr ~}t,llt `.',.lillll:' l,ai ,,¢hilttjcr~, ,,.tlllllll:, [rt',iii Ihclr hollies Who ,,."xcr i'., ~.`.(.)fklll~ Ihl'. (till II,.:cd., Ill J..ll(l`.,, Ihl. S,l,lll¢ll i. ind }',CiliV s.l~`.¢r,,:d ~J, h~ilr~ ~;'m, I'ul{~ si;ftc certified Ii~cf, pl,fcrs Di;inc Fl;igg [{cmg .,,on ;irc ;I rlrclighlcr }ou ',,.ill ;ll,,o krlm`. Ilu., ;irc, I,, .d',, ~.o~crcd b', ('lucI' R..diluuc,/ or LI. [31111¢r who ;irc bolh fi,ll~ Si;lie ccflllicd Iircfiphlcr,, ill :lddlllmi h, Ih~' (~llicl illd;.`ldll;ll'., .``.Itt, i);l~,~ COlnplclcd m Iht SI;ftC prcgnut~ for ~(, I,(mrs (,)tICSlioII ~,Vh;ll is il ,"'.l,JIIiOr:llldlllli O[ I'lldcrM:lrldlllg'~ Di;m¢ Fhlgg - 11 is ;i ~1;11¢ SI;1111¢ Ih;Il ',~.;i'-. j;';l~.xcd Ill I')')l Ih;il ~.;l`.~. hff .ill ;i...',..'ll~lC~, Ih;il ;irc i){,I h,cll~,Cd iliCdi¢:ll pro,.id,:rs Ih;il IJl~', .'.;llould iIi;1~ pro,.idcr Thc Ish,: of ('ripn Fire F)cp;irlincnl Firc Dcp;Irlill¢lll (I(~; IlOl Thc purpose of ;ill ~]()l' I", h~ ;I~,~.ii{'C Il,.,! Iii,' [*Irk! I(`..'xllilildCi I [:IFC [)¢p:mmcnl) :irc propcrl.~ {r;4mcd and cqu,pl)cd c(miminul.',. Th;il is `.',Iix Ibc SI;ri,,: of Florld;i p;is'.cd Ibc 16G 1 Bob.%ch;mk M~ EMT'~;is~¢lln~lhcl.~M'[ ~<,f('ol!,ct('l,ml~ rcncu Il,ell ll~'cll~cc~cr~ m.~c;l~ Thc EMT's ;irc Ir;imcd hx EMS pcrs(mncl Edli,cgcl Do}o,h:lxc;im firclmll~cs~llh EMSm~ollrfirchoil~cs Bob Sch;mk Yes Ed H.cgcl: Yoll approxc - Full IIIIICu Uob ~ch;ink Yes Phsl l'opm ICl ~l;ilion 2~. ~ IIiI1~ lip Iht Bob Sch;in~ Ycs O,cslm, Flor Arc ('luc[ RodriFuc/ bolh fifth SI:lie ccrlll~cd fircfighlcrs" ChlcF RodngHcz Ycs OtlCSllOll Is LI Bmlcr ;m EMT'~ Chief Rodrig,c/ Ycs. hc is olll} rcq,,rcd Oucsnon ToChlcrR()dr~gllc/-Arcyc)tl CI,cFRodngucz No Oucsl~on I[E;isl Nal)lcs ~o,ld ~;ikclhc Bob Sch;mk Ycs OIICSllOll ~Jl;tl h;q)pcliS ir;iflcr ~c;it itc decide ~tc th,l'l u;ml lJll~ ulJ., h.ll,l~c,s h, Ihclr pax" %Oll Jl;l%C [OlllClJllllp J)cllCr. J)rlltg i1 lO Ibc bo;ltd %%c Jl;l%C I~ccil %%,,rklll7 {,11 llll~ liJt ;i ~iHiJlJc of }C;ll% II11%%. ;Hsd x~c reel Ihls Is lhR bCSl ;lllcrn;lli%c [or J%lc QHCSIioII Do Ibc ~[ClllCll have In.loin IJlC Ed }hlcgcl' Bob smd no Phil Popovici: ~ %%ollld like Io cl;irJ[% onc lhJilg. Rod %t)ll lllCnl~(,llcd h, InC Ih;il %t,i and [.I IJllllc[ ;irc hcrc [rOlll ~:l)lJ A ~ lo X;{)l) P.~ Ill ICrlllS p;lyJng }ou bolh N4 hours Chlc~Rodri~llcv I x~ork 13 ilours. Ll Btlller uork~ 12 hours, u,' HiInlc %JJlJl~ Phil Popo%ici So ~il all hollCSl). ;11 o11~ ~1%cII lllllC ;irc %(Ul Oll Ibc p;l}[uJJ rc;id~ mid ;l~;lllablc [or 12 hours, lJlCIi Ibc llCM d;l% il %¥ollld ~ kl Bullet. s(, uc nccd Io clalll'~ Ih;il Ed llllcgcl Onl} onc pcr~ll is h~rc [or Ih~ 12 ho,rs ;J el:ix [;mitt be,Ih hcrc I'mm x ~,~ ,% M n, x i,) I' M and ;irc lilt) (,)lhJ',,ll()n [)tv ',UU h:,.'l IJi;d ['lam N;ll)l,,:', C;lll I')l(~', Ii. lc bcII,.:f ,,.'J', I~..~" oJ' j)rol¢cI Ed [h~,.:~'.d .\ ¢l;I.".lhul h~r J~.tKJ JJ~.l'~,, Ut;lip, ',uhlltl,,.,cr,, :llt.'Ji,.I Ih. I llrlr.d:l,, ul',:'hl ()U'~SIioII Ilm~ Ul:m\ ll\c mi thc Iq¢ ul' C'JllCJ' Rodn~zu¢/ Th;fl h;i,, ;ll~;!~,, J~.'~ll Ilia: h;irdc``l. Ix .,,z%:tluL,_, (Ull H,,x Ii i~.',,idcUl, i~il Iii,' I~,lc ~,l ( ,ipri. ~¢ ;ill klICPO, IIu~, I!, ;lU ddcrh C(lilllillllill~,. ~4(I J Jl;l~.' lU pO ~ull~,ldc lu .'.',:1 ', ohllll~.'¢l~ C'h;iirm;m \Vools¢.', Jim', ili;lll'~ ',oluuto:r,, ;li,~ here ;liid ;p,;ul;ll~l~. 24 hour,, ;, d;iL 16G 1 ~cck ~c didn'! hnvc ;tm. Hxzc:msc h ~;~ ;m Ad~ isarx ntcclln~ Th;~ du n(d h;l~ c h~ ;lllcnd Iht OucslJon. Wh) don'l Ibc vohmlccrs have ;JCCCs~ Io lilt J~ulJdlng'~ Chicr Rodri~ucz. Wc ch;mgcd linc codc b,..cm~sc Iv, o monllm ;~o some(mc broke into Iht ~,l;Hmn. lurncd on dm sircn, and c:mscd Ihc ',chiclc mbc oul of scr',icc I cnmc In Ih;ti murnm~ ~1 ~'.;u., r,.:porlcd Io Ibc ShcrJlT. bcin~ lh;~l v,c hm,'c so m;mv vohmlccrs corec ;md go. ~! ',,,ns m'. dec,stun Io ch;raKe Iht code I ;1111 Roi saying ;i vohml¢cr ¥,'ould do Ih;It. bu! bcc;ms¢ Ibc code h;L~n'l bccn ch;m~cd iii N(! iiI;111.~ ,~C;ll'.,,,,. II ',,,':ts npparcnl Ilml ~vc nccdcd 1o ch;mgc lite code 13dl Pschi~od;~ ~;u, ~cn Ibc code b~ ('hr,s Middlcbrook. linc follm~m~ daF. ~vhcn lhm, ',,.crc c'omin~ Chairm;m Woolsc.~ Bill Psclngod;~ .~L~s no Dill Pschi~(xJ;I Th;ti Is mc()rrccl Phil Popovici: Bill docs nol kno'.,,' Ihc code nnd hc ~, (mr ',,uhlnlccr ;INNI~,I;iIiI clucl CJl;'lJrlll;lll ~,t,/ooJ~,c,, J Jl;~,,~' bccll Jlcrc NiIICC INiN NI:ili(Jll '.~;~,, hHIJl. ;Ht(I HHI~I lie C'h:HffJcd lilt C(~(Ic. J ;Ils(! had il. Hc hasn'l bolhcr to gitc ~1 Io ;mx bo;~rd men,her Phil Popovici: Hcrc is Ibc Ihing. ;'.hcn ',~c look ,I our ~.ohmlccrs. '.~c ~;ml f. luuk ul Iht ;~ccc',,sd~ihl? o1' Ih¢ vohmlecrs. Ihc propcr schcduling . ;md Ihcir ;~hililx 1o mCCl f]rc I')rolCclmn I Ihmk '~ohmlccr~ ;~rc wonderful, bul iii all ;iClunllv x'.¢ h;~vc scrious problems, and '.'.c ;~rc I(~ok~np fur a huJg m.c rcmcds (",)IICSIJOII: Rod. ho'.~ m;m~ hours do you pul Itl') ChicFRodrigucz; We ,aork I'.~¢lvc hours on. hm, c Iht fidl(~'.~m~ d;~x (fiT. Ihcn ;.mthcr IV, eke Imtlrs. Ihcn ;molhcr daF off. I pul in Ibc firsl t,,cck ]6 hours. Ibc ilcx, I ~,,,cs2k ..J,"{ hours C.)ucslion Arc '~011 ~ClIIll~ Chicf Rodrigucz No Ed tlucg¢l Wo.ld ,,on ~cl morc moncx ir,,ou g(~ Io EnSl N;q)lcs" ClucfRodngucz ¢)h. ,,cs OtlcSlioII Do ;Ill ~,OJlllllCRrs h;l',C |licit tp.'~ II hllllk¢! .J'.l~;ll ;lltd ;IfC IJld'~ Ill'sCl', ('hicf Rodnguc×: Yes From Ibc ~Joor J ,,'.;is ;~ '.Ohmlccr Jlcrc. I~1'. ~Jc;ir '.~;1', dr,, rt'~flcd glo'.¢,, t,) '.m;,ll ami J cuuld h;nc bce. Cl.cl' Rodrsgucz tlo,.~, long '.'.crc you :1 voJtmlccr hcrc'~ ('h,cl'Rodr~gucz According lo m;' rccords. [rom December. COItlltlClll J C, lPI(~ here Io ','ohJillCCr. J '.'.;Inlcd Io Ink¢ II1', [)()V Io ;I rll.~, ;lll(J '.Oll ,,~(lllJi. J il(Vi Jcl iii1~ Chic£ Rodrigucz: Th;il is righl, ti:crc is Io much ch;ms on a fire scene I. t;~kc ;J P()V You allcnd 4 c;tlls xshilc )ou were here. Wh;ll ccnific;nions lo ~ou hnxc thai cnn Icll mc Ih:il ~c;ir t~;is ufm;ifc NIc I}cmg thc Chief I [cji thai ?ou x~crc in ;~ vcg ~fc cnviromncnl bcmg Ihnl x(Ju x~c~c n()l ;dims Io Iiglsl ;m~ sln~clurc TOlII (.';llllTtlll .;s, to',', Ilhqllh~, ;1~(.t ','..' f,~.~'l\~d .i I~11.'~ Ih,lt, ',~llll '\,.l'~l-,,I\ t~'lI~l ,t.kllt!J Il'. i ' !,~Ol.. ,11 pro~IdlllX Fire IIf()I.'.II~,ll ¥,L (lid TI., ,utd h.r. ~.l,u~df_d., l,r,,i~,,..d Ih. ( ~,Ull[~ ~t;lll I:,- n gtc Adxlson [~c,;srd h:,~. ~,c .r~ hcrc u, help d x~u ll~d i,ilI h.-Ip I..I Ir.. ~ .... dl fi. I x~f,uhl .i~.,qlr,t~c Nil I,c() (}~ll~ ;llid h[~ ',l,,ll If, I~K,~ ;il ,:11 (,[IIIr,[l% ,llld IIli~l (,H: ',~1, Il I, h.q h)f Ih.' slll/~ll~ ~J x~lll COlltlllllC I(~ york Xxlth Nit ()~11~ ;tlld hl~ ~I;sF[ 1() I]rlll uj) Ih; [~f,,l),)x.iI ,lu, I Ih. mlmh.'l~ (.)11¢ ~,11011 'This Ir` i'(sr (~I1~ ',c;ir ;llld Il Ir` i';ftc%~,;ll')Jv ;llld ~,~c (.hilt I ilfldCr,l.lll,[ Il ','~ (.J(~ll'l h;l',~.' ;I -~', I1! Ihlr` r~hl IIf)t~. ],t~t,, ;ii'. '~,,,; L't,lllI' Ii~ h;l',k; ;i ~,.l', II Il'*, ;~.'-cpl.'d II ~1 (', ,~,.~.~pr.d It,. mdl..,v¢ r;dc x~,ll i,. ;llld ~,s¢ '.~lll h;txc .. ~.t~ iii Ih;Il either" ['~d |hlc/:c] [)Id ',()u ~c.' Ibc j)rc~l(u~, IllcClJlljz I)ld ti. Hi h,:;ll { (,llllllIN~,,h,ll.'( %.l)fll. '*,,J', lh~ll ~.' .~,uJd II'.')l r;ll.(,c thc Illlllc;I.!2c r~lc (..)IICMIOI! [)0C% th;il lll~';Jll ','.~ C;lli ', (}lc ()11 Ihl~,'' Ed HIIC~Jcl NIL Ilu'~ C'h;lll'lll;lll \Vo(I(scT ]I ',.'.Ill llol Ix.' ',()lcd ()Ii Imlcr`', Ihcr~' IlOl ~¢1 I0 ~,01¢ 011 II ellllcr ItU ()Il(.: doc,, ('lucF Rodrl~uC/ I),ClllClllhCr Ill Ibc IiC\l h'.o hs Ihrcc ~cnr,. '.'.c x~lll h,]x.' II1~ huld,, Imm Ih.' I ~ddl,:rs ('rcck and ,'Yl',lln(,;i;I ;~i'c;~ p()',~.lbl~ %]lIll Il(Ill Th:il ~'.~)ll](J hc uutrl IIml IlltlC \\~ Ii;,d (uJr l'~rsl Illc¢llil,~ I()(.J:l% ~'.rlll [:;p,I N;Iplc,, ,a,: ,,,;JI ,dt,'.'.l~ ;md h;,I ;i ,..'h;lll~.,,.' h, I,~l(~, Ill Ibc pmlx)S;d 'Th;il I',. '.'.hL'll '.'.¢ ¢:;1151.,,,: III) ~tllh Iht I~.~.' (lllV(,llpll I)rllll;Ii~ Ilm:f.,llrmr` Ih;il ,Ac ~,1111 h;l',C hi Io(l~ iii1(i ;llld ~.(..'L' ",'.Il;il Ihk"., ~;111 ...()lli,J ~,.llh [',nr`1%:il)l...',, iiJ~.'d~. I(1 (.)11¢~1iOll 'Flu,. Ii;I,., I')ccll ,iz¢}ill~ ¢11i I'(lf (lllllC s(HIIC IiIIiV ;llld v.L' ;l~',J Ii1'..I I'lil(hJl:. ()1ii ;lbsull II \\'h', ' Wh;II ;1bt)Ill Ix~, lU ;Iud I~,~t) t)lll II 'd,j ]I;I",C ;I I'src Oil Ihl~ Iq;md lh¢[~ ;Irc ~lllll? Ill ;iNk I'.;i%l *..u~lc, or X~;irco Io rcspoud .~o xou '.'. 111 h;ivc I,n(s iii. I'.~o (ull. ~,() xx h;ll ir` Iht dc;d here" Phil Pojmvicl 'Sir. Ihc~,¢ i)COl)l¢ ','.Ilo nrc p;lld F)¢oplc (lc) IlliZ~, C~C~ It;l~C Ibc (SltF)t]rh111117 h) g() or ~.~ll;ll ;ib(1uI ii (iC;llh iii Iht I'illllli~,'" \~.~ I%;llll ;i C(SllCCrl '~lllll~)ll ~¥c ~:;llll I¢1 (.,il(),,; Iii)'.'. ill;lll's Ii. il.il(lO, ilO F]rcl~ghlcrs C;lll ~,(lll Ftro\ldC ;il o~lc IllllC'~ Wh;ll {hi ',(m lln~c ;~'.;.I.hlc" \\ Il;il Ii;l%C ~,t)ll tis)ilo iI~ l lms ~s Ibis ~orkcd ()ul I~llh olhcr rll-c conlrol (.h,,l(l~l,~ ' \Vii;il tits xou ch~ hu Ihcm' ~,\ Iix i.. mulU;ll mclusixc') \Vh;ll c;m ~c dr;l~ I'rom') F, cc(m(ll'. [ h;l~¢ Illt~u~hl ulms\ I~mc,. mid Ihl., ~', p, nl of (he IllllllllCS. ;llld I ;Isl.. x(m £olk,, m I(mk. thn~ u, Ibc ',chcd.llu.iz, td uur '.(dlllll¢cP~ i.. (h)llC I (hi (']IiCF Irics ~c~ h;l~d. I)111 ~1 i~i ;I ~ltll;ltlon here Ih;g ix mc~ ;I;ihl~: 's~.c ;uc hs()k,uL, G,~ h,u,,z Icim ('.)liCSlioII I h;l','c COlil;IClCd ~Ir P()iR'~ ICl. I x'.()tlld hLc ;ddc lo .~cl ;t cop> olrthc IIIllllllCS. I would like It) kll(P,'. lifts ill Ihc rccord. I do Iml knou xsh.~, b.l I ~xould hkc Phil Popovici Arc thc iIlllllllC~ hcrc ill Ibc Chair,u;m Woolsc} I F;~xc ,'tlr R()dri!zuc/. CImirmlm Woolsc~ }lc hn~ nil Ihc ;ICCCS~, of Ibc ilUlml¢~,. Il(: is ;Il ;dl Ibc mcclm/z,, c,,c'Cpl I~. nmi ~J's'Cl! coplc~, ol'lllc IIIIIIii[C'~, C;ICh IJ111(.;. ;llld c[)[)ICF, or ihc iiiiiiiliC~ ilrC ill~.o SClll dov, ii Phil Popovlcl Th;ti is ;i IV, O told ;ll,S's,,¢r. \¥¢ h;l',.¢ il nuc¢lui~, s',,¢ h;p,¢ ;~ ~,ohlnl¢cr Ih;Il s',.r~l¢s tll'~ Ibc nlinulcS ;ind she docs ii ou her ossn titu¢, sil,.: l;tkcs lilt books home. ;uld ~¢ncr;lIl? brlnp~ Ihcln b;Ick HI;I)b¢ il 'o.¢¢k bcfor¢ Ibc II¢'~l IllCCIIIt~, Thc books ~.scr¢ I;~kcn iml o1' J);tl I'~F, chlpttd;l'~ office mid i)lll Iii il cardboard bo:,, Ill our Ill¢¢lln~ rooliI, iI1O11~ ',s ilh Ih¢ chccklx~ok . Otl¢SlioIIi Unsccurcd'~ Phil Popovici: Thc,, ~crc ill ;l filc cabincl, likc Illin, origin:ill.', ~scrc ;Ind Illc~ sscrc jusl lnkcn Io Ix: prolcclcd so Ihc.v ssmddu'l d~tpfxz;~r. I'x:clmsc t-!MS% people h;IvC ',;ud Ihc~ s~crc Im.~,mg p;llx:r,¢ from ssJlill CvCr IhC.', had All ss¢ '..'..crc dcHn~ IS I~IIIR Icl protect Iht pupcr,, Yuu ~S;~lll n. m', phone illnnt'x.:r is ou Iny bluldlng OtlC.SlJOrl I ;tn~ cml,, I¢~,J.'lHy [or cnlc ;tnM',cr Wh;il ()fhcl' ;lJIci'tl;llt~,c~, Jl;t~,k' 'sc)ii L'sL'r dlSCtlS~, III IJlc lilSI .s'c;tr'; Ch;lirul;in Wmllsc', I c;m ;m',s',cr Ilml \Vt Jm~.c d~'..cu~,',c,,l c',cr}lhlu.,,z' cxccpl '.,phllmp lilt th~,lrlCl. ;hid I,;~king il sm;dlcr ;Uld cillJlIl~ ii IIi W;~cllmdSul ('.)ItCSliOII WIi', donl s, ou c;llJ Ill pmfcssmn;Jl I'und r;it,,utg'~ Phil Popoxici: Jusl for xour ov,'n Inilld Thcrc i~ uo fluid left for Iht xoluulccrs lip hu~.c s(,d;i or Cllff¢c. nnd normnlJ,, on iIiCClttlg nt~zhl Ihcy Ii;~d ;i droner. SOUlCbodx offered or ssh;tlc',cr. Ihcr¢ ~.sils nlon¢.x for II Your bo:lrd hcr¢ hits conlribulcd nl:lnx nlnn', linlCS. $51) lilt so ~.s¢ could h;l',.c Iht nrc'utes so ss¢ co. ld h;ivc dinncrs for lilt ,.oh,meets Wc vohnll¢¢rcd Il. bcc;umc (~lllcr people d,d nol I,, Ih;ti f;ur cncmgh" Nm,, ~.,.'¢ h;iv¢ iIskcd m;im, luncs Io gel ;i I'm'id IO~clllcr for Ibc ~.ohullccr.~ filr Ih¢ f'trc d¢l'JnrlnlciH 'J'hcs, ;irc nol bcmg p;tid Tirol',, hccu Inkcn ;w,';r,, from us Oucslion I scc ;I possihilil.,,. C;Ul yon COrlSidcr ;i pro£cs,,mn:d f'u,d r;u',cr" Phil Popovlci Brlllg ;~ pr(ircs~,ion;ll rllfld rlUscr m But .,lc (bll'l s~;,m h, .'-'l'~c fhcm ,)u",, or S~ll;ll ~,~.¢ colIRcl cilhcr. OIl¢SliOll' WIi'~ ilOl') Phil Popovici V',hs not" '1'hill'S mil illc ss;ix ~1 ',',~rk~, hcrc There is ;Inullscr ;in,,s~cr It, Ih:il (lllC~lion Thrcc ',c;trs ngo. s~.c cmcrl;uu ow of EilSl N;~plcs. x,.¢ xtc~c hnx lU.~ trouble s~ lib ~ cshlnh2crs, lip,.: COlllllltllliJ.~ d~d nol s*.;llll Io p;I) Ih¢ ;~ddlhOll;ll I full Imll. so Ibc hc~,l cJTarlS Ils Ir', pul ;i dcp;irlIncnl Io~¢lhcr II ~s nol obvlousl) ssorkiu~:,, bec;mst nos~ Pi h;Is bce'omc ;~ p;ud lire dcp;irllncnl Nol ii solulllCCr p;lid l',r¢ dcp;irlnlcnl Wc Ii;l','c p;lid FircnlCtl II thd m~l st~rk Ih¢ v,;~., s,.c h;Id i~l;ulucd ~1 II Ii;IS ch;In,,cd. Thill IS S',;l', ',,s¢ ;Irc Jookillg ill $Otll¢lhill~ Oil ;I '..:J[Snlr;~clu;d b;t~.l~, for Oll¢ }c;tr s~,tlll Ibc S;llllC nlillc;l~C r;llC. C)ucslion Tills Ires b¢COlU¢ n t,,roup of PCOFdC ,.,.ho arc llliikmg rcconllucud;dmm,. Ih¢.'s ;IrC nOl nc~;cs>.;iril', looking ;Il Ih¢ FIrc Adv~son,. Bo;Ird and Ihcv ;irc ccrt;Uuk nol Io()km.u, :ti u~ kt;~FIsc Iht I')¢r,;t Ihing ~,soltld bc Io go wilh Ensl N;iplcs. bul ;~ group or Cilizcns uccd io Iiclp m;~kc lhlf., dccl~Ktn Would si do Ii~, lin,, good Io go IOgclhcr ;is n ,uroup ;md spcnk Io Ihc BO:lid" Phil Popovici: Arc r¢;t~on for cxislcnC¢ is lo bc lite c.',¢.'., ;nld ¢;Jrs for Iht ('ulhcr ('Ollnl', ('OllllmSsmncrs To relay illl'orIililliOll oil Ibc l~r¢ ~tviso~ dislricI Wllh Ih;il Ill IIIlIId. ',~h;ll 'sxc ;I ~;;I}lll~ IN" ',sc h;Iv¢ some problcnls hcr¢. ;llld SS.¢ ;ire ]ookhlg roi il J(lll~, lcrln rcmcdx" 16G 1 ('OltlltlCIII \Vc ~;1111 I~ help Ofle *,,~,;1% Or ;lllolhcf \",'C h;,~.¢ .:'1¢~1c(I ,,ll',u'l;~l,,. ;lll(,I tit,..,. ;,,,.. ~'lCu. l~:~.l h~ Ilt.ll..~' ~.lu'~l'nl(lli ~C h.l%~' Ill I)tlt ?,OIIIC IFIl.SI III thclll ;lilts Ih~.' I~()lll~.' thu~ hlf~.' ('0111111CIll Itl :l ',,.:;,r ;,,,(I ;, hi,ti, Il ~',111 h,d pt'.,l ;,% (lltllLIIII I,, )~CI ¢~llt (,l fbi"., Il ~.',~' cJIill I ",',~lltl II ,l~ II IS Ch;lirlll;lll W()(')Isc% ()11~ (il' th~' Iii'si Ih111~ I]lC ("(~1111111'nhl{lll~.'i% IIl'.,l'-,l ()Ii I"., I'rollt lite COIIlIIIIIIIIIx ('OilIIIlClll .~c)lil~ t~f Ihu: (.111/~i1% do flcll lOCI ~,~,'~ hit%{,: ;Iii ;Ill(il]let Id~;I ('[lllll)llsslllll,,;r tl;lllCl)(.k ~&hull he lilsIFIILI~.'(] ~]r (j~.lls $;HLf IHsl Ih;Il I~,~,1.. x&,' h;l~/;~111%'~11~ Ih;il x~,e IICCd C(]rrl;~.lC(]. ~,~: II~.'l~d II) look ;~1 III;llll)o%,,I.'l I%%11~?, ;lllll Ihu' ,I}~1111% ll~ IlfL~., I(k' I'llk' I'~l~lu's. llL~fl I.¢Is lOOk ;11 I0 E;Isl NIpples ('ll;llrlll;lll Wo(')ISl~% j')~)~:% ;lli.%(lll(~ II;1', L' ;lll%ljllll~ (']l;llrlll;lll ~.~,'ool~,c~ I.cls Jl:l%c ;~ Icii illllllllu: brc;]k I~*.O ~';IC;IIICIC% OII Ibc bo;ird .~Of~le or il: did i1(11 ~cl i])l., fL,,.,lllll~.,, HHIfI II1~,1%~.'%t,.'l'.J;1~, (~r I~(l:l,, ;]J~J I ;ifil ]lereb.~, po~;lp()ltfll1., ;iclJOll (ill Ih;il iillt]l lilt llCXl Hic¢Illt.~ ~h,ch ~:dl b. Ihr,,:c &~,'¢k, Ir,,II~ I;i,,I Hl'._'h! Thc oilier II¢it~ 1,. ;i :(lie :~hcthcr or IIOI IO ;I~.'L'CI)I Ibc I~(~l'~():;ll tl(,ll~ [!.i',l \.~id~TM, .i, t~.tll'.: ll~ hll.' '~ Ith t)llf A :JiSCllS~,lOll J'ol]o',~cd (Ill I11¢ III11C J'r;llllc for Iht ¢l¢clloH lot Ih:.' .\¢t', i,,ol", ii~'itlt~..'f,~ JclTP;Igc h ~s l),:cclltber I J)hil Popo~'~ci Thc ¢lll,fSlJOll Is b~lll1~ l'~llsed IS Ihls pro~ ~dlllg cl~h;Hh~:.:d ser~ f,.¢s h, Iht Iii,.' ,~f (';tpH Fire C'olltrol DislricI Ch~ HIg ;irc currc~ll SI;lll(Jlll,l~ or i~o p;irtl;lll~ i);~l(I illdl,, rClll;llk StJl~l)lcil~clil¢(I b~ ;lllLl X ()Il P,~vJ lo X'I)() A,5.J P;ir;lllledlc J']rl2fJ,l~JllCl' Jl ;IJ)l'JU:;ir~, Il] ii1¢ I~ p¢ol~l~. Ill pl;l~, 24 Ill~lll~ ',~,,HI~I ~l~c' ils lllllCJl ~r¢;llcr C(l~ u:l;l~¢ Ir ihi~ prt~j~ls:ll c;lll bc dclc'rl~Hl~.d Ih;il ii I~, Ic;~hlc I ~lllc] ~ll~'l lll~ ~I~ ;llld Ii' Ihls COllld be d¢lerllll~cd ;~s f¢;ISlJ~ilil~ I ~oldd c(lllc, r ~lh ;]~ :]~.Cl31~llp IJl~ i~1)~;~1 Ch;IJrlll;lll Woolscx ~ \Vill ,~ou lll:lke Ih;il ;IS ;I HlOlloll" Phil Popo%'ici Wc ;ir,.: ,Ii for sIIg~csliOII.s" I d(] hchc~c Ih;il ,%1r II;Ir:cock ~ll*.'ll ho dlrc:.:lcd %lill ~ilh Ihis propos;ll. II ~ollld bc brollghl b;ick Io ii,,. ~,o ~c co,,id help ~llh rC~lC~:H~, II lllCIlllOlIcd Io I11C III lilt p;Jrkillg lot Ih;il SIIc ~'.OllJd hc IIIJl[C Ih;ill ~ IIIJII.L~ I(I ~,~Cl~.'~)lllC ()ill '\tjx JO $1l III Oil IJIc ile~t)ll;lllOllS b¢l~l Ei~tc~',¢llc) ,X]¢d~c;~J .~¢r~ ~cu'~ ;Hid [(;l!,l 16G 1 propos;ll bcforc ;m~ rccollllliClld;IflOll IS Itl;ldC I0 thc [{o;ird of ('Olllll~ Phil Popo~ ici C;m I;Isk npproxinl:flcl} ho~ I(m~ n ~ dl I;Ikc" Ph{I Pop<:~s. IcI Oil Tus.:~d;I, Ih,,:~ ',%ill h;l',e ;t ,,;pe..:~;ll ill~lltl~ (.';itl x,.~ h~ok ;it ;t COllll';l~l Ill ;I .,,s,j,,.-k to 1¢tl d;lys ,IclT P;Igc II need'.. Il)hc h)(d.,cd nl h', th,,: (.'()mll.', CJlnirltl:ltl WooJsc% C';111%~c jilsl vole on ;111 ncccpl;llt¢C A disctlsSiol! Follm'.cd on lite COllir;ICl ;ind ;i d;ttc htr Iht Phil Poix),.ICI %']l;n I ~;~. ;.skt,g is bce)re ;~ colllr;K:l J% ~l~llcd. Ih;Il 'c,,.: '.'el ;I I;l'.,l I.ok DJ;me Fl;igg [Ll,,¢d tlpoll ~Ah:ll ',',e h;l'.C Iod;l'.. '.'~c do l~oI kllOs.s. 11' it i'. ;i luuhcr It',el of ,.er,, icc cn/rclll level of scr',~cc, or ;~ l,',,,er le,.cl o£ serxlcc 'll.;n I,, thc fir,,I tlttC',il(m Ih;Il IlCC(.J% to [1C ;lll,,,.s.cred Ix:fore ~.~,e t;llk ;III~,tIHH~ ;ibOtll ;I COlllr;icl Ed I-hlegel C',m ',',c ask ~.o. ilr;I coillr;]cl ]s dr;l',xll, h,:lor;,: II t,. ',~nccl. c:m ,.s.,.' h;l',c ;m Olq'~orIHnli? Io ix: ;i p:ln or th;l! Mr Leo Och~; Phil Por'x).,icl If' ~l ~,,, prc. pcrl.x dlsdc.:.scd ;md nollcc'd. I loci Ih;il s.s.c ;1', ,~ hu;]rd s.s.~, nccd ir. h;P,c ',omc coJscsivciIcss Iii Jooktll~ ;11 Ihls iSSile I'tll il(ti ~,;17 iiig th;it mir ~ood Fire LJl;ilrlll;llt ,~.lltlltd Ill;Ikt.' dCCl~,l()lls. J .itiSl feel th:il ~.'.c h;r'.c :l dLIIX Io ollr COlltfllllllll? I0 tl~.' all of t,.r I;dcnt,. Io h..,k ;~l tim, I fluid,, ~t ~,~ould bchoo,,c ;ill o1' u'~. t. bc ;~ purl (il' Ihis Ed Ih,¢gcl C';m I dl',:tgr¢¢ ',~.iih .',ot]. I Ihink once Ihc.~ get :l c,.mlrnCl ih:il i', h.',~(h should look al , .:,. ;~ t',c,;~rd I Ilmtk Io III;1117 l)CUl)lc tn lhcrc mudd,.sn~ Ul'~ Iht ',,..~ler,,. oH ;~ ctmlr;~(.I hkc Ibis i{'yoll ',s. ouldn I mind I v, oJdd re;ill,, like IO dcm;lie ',ullr ~.crs. CIl;lirlll;tlt Wool.~cx I ~,gOllJd .iiiM like lo rex ~cxx II Phil Popo,,.tcl I :~.c, ul,:l hkc IO re-si:itc Ill',. nlOlton I v, oukl I.kc lit m:d.,c ;~ lUi)tlnll Ill;it thc I',lc of (';lllrl Fire Advisor', [3o;ird Iil(t~.t2 forv,;ird on r;lli[',, thc j')J'CIiitilll;ir~ i')rul;O,,.d imf hch,n.: m, ;lliCl .lllox,. Mcdicll Ser', ices and EnSl N;Iplcs. Fire Dcl3;Irlnlcnl Itt i:.rux idc ;s corel'deled th)Clllll¢lll s.s, luu'h cnn ',ii.tm. applic;mc?, of ~rc;,¢r fire proleclio. ~.ilhllt Ibc !,,;m~c co,..I i)nq)o',;d ,', M;flcd ~H Ih,.' isschmHi;~r~ I nl;Ikc ;i nsol~on Ih;it ".se lsccd Io muve forv.;m:l ~o E;r,.I N;q'dc,, F~rc [)Cl~;fflmcHi :md l!n~crgcn,,.'? Nledlc:ll Services can v, ork om Iht r;llificd dcx::umcnl for ,,c~ Ch;~irnt:sn Woolse,, Do ,.,.c ll:rvc ;i Second Ed Huegel I x~ilt seCOlld th;il, jtlst so Iolsg :IS x~,< SeC ;I colllr;Icl hclbrc ii IX ',lFncd All m fisvor ~l} I - Mollon p:tsscd Ed t'hicg¢l I ,.~o.h! hkc lO kuo'.'.. Ihcr~: t', ;~ Iof uf bmbhn.u ~'.mg (m fh,.' J',l.' ol (':Hwl~ Ih:il I", It,o! co~¢rcd OIlc pcr,..n h;~(J Illtp:lCI fCC'. of ,~?-;¢1 }"of ['ll'c (J~.'~,l,211;tlc~J lo ,2o lo ?.1;tl'..u ]~,l;lll{J '['htJ'~ ~hould ItOl bc gcIIIIIg Ilk;Il JclT P:,Kc 'l'h.~ h;~ ~..c I. Iht b(~;u(l II.cc Imlc~ ;m(I h;~ hc~'ll I)ullc(I Iht~'¢ Ituiv~ A si~J;tl iitCCIllt~ ~11 Itc hcJd (Ii1 J"l'lJJ;l% ;il ti (ill I' ,~ I(ll thc f¢~.'(JillfllCit(J;lllOll of IJlc itc~.~. /\d', t,,(~r\ J~o:lrd 16G 1 ISLE (}1: (',.\PRI FI[U:. & MF.E'FIN('; - MINt November 21. 1997 Chairman Woc, lsey Thc only business v.,e have to bring toniuht i~, thc ccmsidcratitm and recommendation fi~r thc applicants l}lal JlllVc submit lllcir Hames li~ ilj}J~(}irlllllc{ll to thc Isle Capri Fire & Rescue Advisory Board fi~r a Iwo year term starling ~m Jimua~' I. 19~8 We have fimr applicants arc lhcrc any comments' The applicanlh ;uc ('hmlch [)cxtcr ('olvin. Chris Xi?gianis. Peter Kocik & Matt Krouse 5'cra have had a chance to $1udv lhcir resumes A discussion on the candidales f'ollowcd Jerry Marinaro made a motion to elect ('harles Dexter ('olivn and Chris Xigogiani~, to thc board ,Motion was second by Phil Popovici M(~tion passed t,lanmltmslv \lotion carried Chairman \Voolsey stated he would prepare a mcmor~,ndum and .,.cml to thc Board of ('tmnty Commissioners stating tile Advisory Boards recommendation for thc nc~.~ members Chairman Woolsey stated }lis last meeting would he the next meeting on Thursdav December 4. 1998 and al tidal time hc w,uld turn thc gavel over to thc board PI'iii Pope, vici extended his apprecialiorl m ('hairman Woolscx fm all hc has done l'or this Advisory Board Ed }lucgel woukl like for everyone to knm,. thc next meetinM ,.'..ill I,e l)ccembcr 4. 19{)7 Another point he wanted to bring up Jdl'and cmnpany have t~ccn taxed\cd m the .,Xclviso~, Board meetings for a little while now. and hc x~otlJd like some kind ol' inptll bv letter, as to his situation. He has taken the position that hc is a laxpaycr in East Naples. and then he comes down to our hoard meetings and tells thc hoard xxhat to du Nlr l lee-el believes that is a conflict of'interc.;t tie would also like a letter J)'oln [)Jane's olt~cc rellim2 them abotll the law Is this an independent board, even though tl~cv arc only an advisory hoard, or (hms the County lell us how tt) run our m:etings Chairman Woolscvstalcdstaffnot County Ed Huegel would also like to discuss the Advisor)' Board's sccrctarv that thcv have had for many years Another person ;vas brought in ltl take mint,res 5,11' }lueuel would like an apology to their secretarS', who is their choice, he ~.'.ould like her thc receive tile rccognilitm she deserves She ,,.vas lhe secretary long before EMS slepped in Phil Popovici stated he received a letter ['rom ('oilier ('ountx rcl'e~cncc minutes and tapes Mr Popm'ici is not clear on JeffPage anti a conflict Mr }lucgcl. statcd JcfFPagc ~.,.cnt to thu last East ~aplch ]'irc [)upartmellt ..\d~.i.~or~ muctmg and stated hc is ~ resident of Rest Naplc~ I Ic i~ not a ~chkk'n~ .f I~lu ~t' ('apri. hc i., n-t on our hoard as selected b~ thc ('.unty ('.mnnssion, and ~lcilhcr is [)i;mc I~ our hoard rm~ under the control of thc stafl~ and my problem with thc coh'.lict of interest is if he is a resident of East Naples and bas a position there chics he have a pi~siti.n hctc als, f~ Is lhal 11 conllicF~ He went to thc mcctin~ and made a statement lhal hc WarltCd to inaku guru Ihal J~ast Naples was not ~oing to be paying taxes to support thc Isle of Capri 'rbu~ held thc mcctin~ off' [bt a ~otc until riley have a public fbrum like wc had at our las~ one 'I't~is is nasty, hut if this is like I think it should be. until we arc directed by letter, and told wlmt to do. or'if [)ianu is part of this board. 1 will take ruscr~ati.n in being here. hecaus~ I ~ill not ~rL ~ilh [)ianc [:la~ Is this an Advisor' Board (fi'community members, or is il an Advist~r~ [h~i,rd of the stal¥ Jerry. Marinaro stated Jeff' Page had done a lot ofw. rk for tile h.ard I h.' ha,~ throe Iht' impact fee sit, dy and I personallyv, ould like to thank bim Jeff Page stated he is rcsp.nsihle for Isle of Capri and Ochopcc Fire l)cl~arlmt.'nt Ed Huegel stated he w~uld like a letter stating how this Phil Popovici would also like to acid to thc a~enda, tile update cm tile fire impact stud)'. ~here are ~ve. and if we have any feed back from thc Board of ('ountv ('o 11 I1 ssionurs and/or l~asi Naples based on any conversations that have transpired and if they can bring any mc'anin.~lhl inR~rmation back to us Ed t luegel stated there ,.vcre some comments made b,. ['~Xl.% about hw, ing an ambuhmcu here. and he has one question he would like brought up Jeff Page wanted to creation the board again, tile onl,, thing tile,.' are all.v, ud I. clisct,ss i~, tile recommendation of the :~e~t board mcmbels Thcv cilllllt'~[ hold an OF)e~'l meeting Ed Huegel stated it is not an open meeting Ed ~.~.ould like lo ask a c~mplu ot'quustions Jeffstnted he woulcl sit and talk withMr Ih,cgclaftcrthcmccting Mr lluegel stated he did not want to talk with Jeff'after the meeting, he ~.anled it in ~.,..'riting tie stated Jeff Page ,.','as ,.'err infimmus about his letters, and he wants it in v. riting Phil Popovici wants ct,ntinued service of Emergency Services brought up ill tile next meeliug Chairman Woolsev saicl it could be broughl t,p under new bt, siness Chairman Woolsey askect fi~r a motion to adj.urn Meeting adjourned 16G 1 Adx'ison Bo;ird Nlcmhcr,, Pr,:,.cnl C'h:.rn~;m l.h,s d-.%I.,H)" I'I.I ['opo's ICi f!d J~.'rrx I'.:.d I luc~c'l prcsclm:d ;~ phlqm: [rum Ill,: Adx u,.rx [;o;~rd It) Ch;urm;m \V~uI',cx h,r lu', f, %c:lf cuntrdmlmn lo lhc bn;~rd Psclug¢)d;~ ti:l,, dm,c f~ll' Ibc h,~nr(J %IlmllC% Inuu iht ",~Jxcmhcr ?l I'~'~' lu~f,,..'~ x~,'fc fc..I h~ I'hll JCf'[' JJ;Ip~ J:lrcsclllCd (,JJ]~.l;ll IIiiIilII~.'., ,,I Ih.: ll~cClJlp..' ;illcJ c',.pl;Jlll..'d h~' ~l),,l .c h~ ~.11 ( ),.h', m rc:,;utJ,, lo IhL' bO;lid's r~¢jll,2'st iror ~.I'., P%c. JH'~'~td:, In :~:!.Hn h..: nhlc h~ hz~n'd lJic liJllllfl.~, }l~ ~.HtI .11 till', IIIIIC IIH', Ix II, ti II~()IIHJ3JR dll¢ Io IJl,Z DiOr)IL'III '¢,llJl IJ,c prc'~ it)u'., illllllllC'.. (.._'h;ilrlll;tIi \¥(.)oJ'.,c', ~.',;lllh~d Io III;II' ,.' ;I ;urlC,tlUll III ruJcf,~llL~.' I',, IIIc IIHlllllc'-,. ;iii ;iJJ,.:J;dlUll Jl;l', bc.~ll Itl;Id¢ IJl;ll If4 IIOI correct Nit Ed HIl~g¢l ~,',;liil~, ,'~ll r~2c(lreJ ~,I% PSCJll~od;I x~ ill COIIIIIHI~ hi I;IkC lh~' IIHHilIC~ flor thc hu;lrd tlnlil llu~ IS resolved TJi~' HIIR~;IIIOlI'S :lr~ iiiIJ~)lllt(J~(J 'J'lu~ hoard ~OllllllCCr ;Hid i1(1 CtllC i% J3~ilt~ i);ll(l Io do III1% Jtuc~cl x~ll luke IJll% iit;lll~'r lip x~Hh Nlr [.o) ()ch~ NIr tlucg¢l knox, s, umx Ihnl ;ul ;!,:zcnd;i Is f~'qull,..'cl IIc x~;l~ I)rcxcHIcd m, ;i~'cuchL hx Nh /cH P;s~c I'of IoIIf~Jil'S lllCellllg ;q)l~roxHs;:ucl) II1 IlilllllI~'% I)CIulc thc fltCCIIli~ IIc xxuuM hLc Io lC(lllC%l Iht J~O;lld rCC~l&C IJlg lllc'CiHi~ ;i~encJ;i :d Ic;tsl ;i .cck hcl'urc c;lcJl Ill~L'llll~ kO Ihc~ Jl;l~c Ilflic I(~ ~t~ tJ~cf ;Hid ~hiLJ~ C:lCJl ;l~elld;I tlc ;IJ~) J~'L'J~ IJic J)t);Ir~f ,',u~illd I)~ll lilt ;I~CIKI;I It~cihcr. ll{)l I.NJ~ I,%IPACT FEE b'I'ATi:S: Nlr JolT P:lgc ~,l;llctl Iht [~u;ird ul' (.'olUllX ('onJlnl%.;it)lh.'l,. h;ixc .ll)l~rL~x ~'J h,r ',l,lll h, x~,rk with Ill,..' /'\tlorll¢',, '.'., Of'fiC'C h) '~¢ck hi I'~rln ;in ()i'CJlll;lllCC I0 J'~llll~.2' Il;IcL lU Iht J~,,,.liLJ I,'l IJl~' Inlp;l~.l Icc', Xh Popox icj rcc:lllcd Xlr Och~, ~;l;llcd Ih;at IJll', could pu'.~,dd~ h:ll~l)CU hcl'~..' [).'~,.'ud~.'f '~ I I:i,,hkuid A~isOCi;IIL?, Jl;l',¢ COml~lcled Ih¢ slu'l', lot IJlL' I~'~.'%. Ih~2', ~lll Ilul ',',II1¢ Ill, I.',lSIlillt,II 'J hc rc,,ulullmS x,.lll bc 'arillen b,. J¢IT Nit Popox ic~ '~;tul,2tl il rex l¢~x ',)lI ~,lJ~, II I:lk,.:% st) hms I'or Ibc Cxl)l;uucd Iii,.: proc¢,,s :~ documcu! Illll:.,I ~L) Ihrou:zh lu hc pul on ('om,Hssioucrs ,'".Il P;l.~zc si;lied hc ~11 Ir~ It)pul thc (.;idu~;m,.c Iogcthcl Flagg SI;lied bcc:lus,~2 Il is ;ill Ordin:mc¢ ii ~ill huxc Io ¢(I lo i)ublic hc;ir~n,~ bcl'uic il goes bcl't~rc Ih¢ Bo;~rd poss.blc lsl¢ of (.';H)ri ¢;lllllOl rc:dl/c Ih¢ ilion,,:,, I'mm IiIll'l;l~t [:ck:'., Ulllll Ih< ()frill1 m..' ~', p;l',',.'d I'Rf}POSAL ¥,'ITII E..\.'.;'F NAI'I.ES FIRE I)EI'AICI"q ENT: .".Ir P;i.,.'¢ l:flkcd s~llh ('Il]cf .<.ch;ink oil lit,: Ntncmhci 2 I I'P/'~ ;md II.' ,,s.v, -llll v.,m~n: oil I'lbtuic~. Imm FUND RAISER ,',.Ir ~1.:~.,~:1 staled lit..". ',~;mlcd IlL)Vi ~r;llllllOtl%].~ V., I]ll,IHI ',, ('.;it)ri I', ',ltl)l)J~, lilt' ;I d~,',.~'. 1~,I Ill',.' t)~,,~l } Mdl.'~-. I,,,x.: ;l~tcvd Io ?'~¢ I1% ;I ',lip I~- 's',e 's~,;illl II II '.',.,lld h..: h;:s ;ll~o oll;~rcd ;, dock ('111E["'S I(EPO R'I': (._'hlc[ [~.¢)drl~ll~/ ~;l~c Ibc I(JlhJ~lil~ r~.'l)oll I(~r thc iil~l~lli E)I' Noxk'fllhcr (nll.~;hcd) ()lie ~cluclc -Illl)lol IIt)lllC fire Xlr }i.~?cl ~;llllcd [o kll(~x ~ho rc~l),,ndcd Io Ibc fire" If Dcm-; ~cilI I'lOlll I{XIS ~;]s pnld *~r x~;~s she ;~ ~()]lllll~Cr'~ ~Ir f;l~' rcM~.,Mcd Ih:il ;m~ lllllC ;111 ~'llll)~, ,x ;. (~l' I'~.I~ rCSl)Olltls Io ;Ill X~;IS COllC~rll~d bx Iht ;dlc?tmn~ re;Mc }lc IL'~ls Ihcr~' ;,re Ihm~,.~ Ih;,t hnxc Is,~ppc. th,,I ;irc ;~ p;srt fire help. ;m incidcnl ~lh ;~ crcthl c;nd imlt~.~ g;~s Ii1[o o11[ bonl ;md ;~ I)~.~ xc~cl g.~ng on ;t d~xc Ir~p. illld Iht bo;ti brck~ ,Jox~n ;llld ll~xer ~ClII kill Iht trip tlc x~;ult~'d lo know ~xh;g h.plw. Its Ils;il A fcx~ olhcr ,lc,ns ofconccrn x~mld bc thc i)l//n III~RIcIll D~d this h:~l~PC,~ t~ dld.'l I1 h~l)pCn AI~ ;molhcr bonl ;iccldclll. Nh [lucgcl h.~ dg'l'crcm stor~c~ on Ih;Il III(IdClll }1~' x~o]dd hkc Io kllllX~ ~l]l~ thc bOnl ~:~s :~1 (k~rdon P.s~ ;utd Ilol HI Iht I~lc of C:~pr~" ~ hx ~;~s Iht bo:mi ilOl nd'urmcd or ihc~c (.']lHJrlll;lll \Vool~'s rd;lied ;Il Iht Oclohcr IISC~21111.,._'. ',ohllll~21~, x~crc it1 Its,.' ILl\ ;llld Ih,.'x ',,.¢r¢ II~l p,,:lliSlllCd Io ;lll¢)ld Ibc OpClt llsCClllI? ()11,2 ~)l'lhc ~,uhml¢cf.. Ililll~..'tl Ill Ihctr ~c,.L,.'n,~t.,. Ih;fl ~,, Cllill.'..' ;lll(.J Iht'. ;irc Xlr Ih]c~cl ,.,.;is h)l,.I Ih,;r..: %.%;],, ;m ;iFI'q~.'lil~.'tll ~.,,tlh }{;l~,t ~.;ll)lch ;lll(I Ih~ fir,: IIu.k l I,.: ,.,.;is h)ld th,.' trUt:~ '~;1%11'I ;Ill% UO~L[ :%1r. ,.'.ir, il p,,l.h~l.cd" ('lu,.'l i;.~,th~,..'u,.'/ %t.ll~;t.l ,.,,!,..ll Il:.' iI,.t,l.'l:l ~x...itrzk.',.I I',l...' · ~',l C';l[~rl did uol o,.,,t~ Iii..' Iru,..k ['.;i.q ~',;ll)l.',~ 'qlll u',,,u,;t_l Ill,' Illl~ .llld Ih,", v,~f.: ]ii .ll;tl'..'c ol Ibc Ill;Itilt,:ll:lll,,.q 'I'llq III.Illtl,.'tl;lll~..' Tlhit %~,.1', tivoli.' t,tl llIC trM.~'. %',;1% %X el{ti, t!il.; h, tl~. flr;llll'~ '1 ii;it '.,OltICllllll~ Iii;il (.lOC', IT~'I h.ll)pCl, c)%..'flll;'II! I)l,lll.' I"hLv~ I,~,h I*tllIClll~.'l ttft~lll I ;I-l "'.,Ii)lC-I ,llltl I{,,d IIlCI ",()llICllllll'.;' Ih,Il %~,~1'. ll.li~l'~.'lltli:.Z' I~!lt'2 h,..l,,rj I'.,1c (d'('~ll)tl h,t~!., I'A)'nk, C'N%I~Ul itl l]t.' lrtl.[. ( Mci ~,l;ll¢(.J linc Iru:k i..llll :1,~1 r..'l~.,r,J [ h.' lcilmr .pti', n.".',,l', I,~ bc ,..~lUl')l.l.' Il,. t.'ll.'! ,,,~l', ,: ,Ail', []..;'.cl i,.,kcd ;11 "['ll~ Itl,.'t..li;llll~ .I,d.~,l h..' h,~d m,l h,,,l..;d ;il ti ('lu,:t I~.~dlI.L'uc/ ~l:ll.',.! li~. ',.iix,' .,,uld I1~,1 RI"Xl F;m'.'C r. n~,l ','.,,Ikl~l/ Mr I'~l',:~',l,..i ',',;inlcd h~ t.,mr,', lllhc I'ull h,ld I',.'.;l~ l'Xm.I Ih; h,:cl'. r¢l);llr~ Ii;l',~ Ii(H ~"~¥Cll .,)ml)b.:l.'d k,;lll~l~l~..llllll~, IIIII I~.~ Il;l% ltl,..' bill XIf Itu,".:,l :,.~lm. h~ %11 v. wh l:.r,l ,~;ll}l,.:', ;md F.:l lhcir t;,'llll t;l",l,:',', [)l;inc FI;v._".' '.,tilled Ih;il I':m.I x.;q:'l.'. ~n ::,,~,d Imlh ,,h~Md (.'hl,:l' P.,,,.hl,'u.:/ ,.,u~l~m~..'d v, Hh Iht \,,',end',ct (')l)Cl;~Inul. l~.'i~,tl ',.,.,hml..I [~.'p,,ll I Immm., ~% I~m.l,..'cl .%Ir Ed Ilucx,,:l ,.',;m1~xl :l Ii,,I Ibc ,"~u',¢ml')cr I'~1¢ mM ii' IllulH;d ilid ('hlcr P. odrt,..'[]c,/ ,,lal¢(.I ii v,,.mld lalx¢ Iht ,,;]ll[¢ mntulul td'lll[]c. II I.]c ,,I f :ll~i i- iii flu. ,,I,Ilplll ill II [!;I.~1 ,~:lpl¢'s i. in tile ,,l;lll,,ul li':l c:lll ,.:OhiO', Ill I1,¢', mthqli;lllt,;;lll) cml hn' I .]-I ". qfl.', (*~ ".l.~i,t, It ~,',Oilld l;l~,C lilt k';llll,..' ;liilllllill or IIIIlC il' l{;l'.l \:qfl,.,, ,,,,,..i.: ill li~)lI,n~. [ il4 ~lqt~.lh'U ',', i. ,I-~.,,.'tt Iii rjI..'f,.'u.J h~ f,,2~[)(lll.,C lllllC t'~':l,~,C.'ll ~.1,1l'..d,~ ;llitl [i;l%l '.,qd,:', ( hr.'l i.~,,,.lr,:m~'/ I~'~,t',~dlt.~.",t ii d.t,~.n,.l..'d ,),, :',h~.'liicr I ,1~,1 k;l[}lc', 'v,¢b..' iii Sl.llh~ll ~'~ Ih;Iii Xl:lr~.~ [I,..m.,,.' (l:]il.. ',l;llC,.I it h,lt~ Iliiltl;llllICtl [)t~lr~Cl C'lucl' [~.t)dl'x,._'[ic/ r,:l)U:tcd ult Ill,: ~l;tll'lll}Z I.",,:l,, tm [~,~xll ')1~ 'l Ii1% tllClllt~ %,,.i. ~Utlm.".l.'d h', ~.1~ J,.x, (},.Il'. ~lr [')Oil(l', h.I V,;lilh.',.l I~.~ .'.'.t~ Ll',cr ;l(JdlllOII IIII'L)[II;;III~Ill ll(llll DI;III¢ I!lCI Y. IIh T(uII (. Hlllll.)ll ;111(1 ('Jllcl ~.ll.lllts Ih¢ lhll[)~.,-C %',,1% 1,~ ~.~i..It-- I~",; u[,I.h tll,~ll,,;'* ~A,In iI',,;lll;lbl:2 Ill Iht [),ud.'.'¢I ."~llllllll;Ir~ lh,.'lc r., '%ll,'i.lil)l, hq;il lml ,.mi', %1 ,11 ~*~**, hw.I I~,.,.'n alh~,,.mcd Iii hc expended Thc r..'f,,I I~ Ill I(CSCI~C'~ l'hc ~14 I.tlllll I'., %%[i:11 I,, :r, ml.~blc I,,! t~l~.'l:Hml]', Xl[ Ilucgcl IhOll~hl Rcscr',c'~ ?,, o1' thc im[d~z,,:l ~z~.',¢s ml,.~ Itc,,cr',c~,. Ih['~ ;iI]i,,~HiiI iX k,~.'t h', Ill.' ',hll.' [.11;111',.' I:hlg,'.z rcl'~rl,.'d Iht I~Ic ol'C';ll')rl (h',,Irlt:l had bud~Z¢lcd ~[~, I');Irl ol'lhc $14 I/l~JtL %X?~l~, I't~r lh~ i)mul:~ f,.:t'~,llr 'Ih¢ F'I TI I(E I.'.'~1% I~1 I}(;E'I: [)I;IIIC F"hl.'.'.'.' '.,];ilcd r,,Ic', ~d (';q'.J m,',', Ii, I;,.; ;I '_'H;il;IIIICC ;I p;If,m~cdl, lil._'l'l!Ehtcl ','.Ill hc hcrc ;,I Iht '.,I;]ll~,~ll [r(.)ltT N Illl j) I1! Iii ~ Ill} ;I ltl II'I],c J':l",l ~;ll~J..'", J'Jr,.' [)f..l~t,,..I duc'. c~..'..l.' .f .~,1111 i.I ~',llJT Ibc I',(~:ml ('Oifnl', (_',.mlI~,P,'.hHICI'. Ih.; ,.mi\ Ihlll~ Ih;d ',',.dl ...l~;tfI'.'c f', thole ~',~ll I~,.' n,, :'.,mmt.'u Ih;It thc p;ir;llllcdlc,'l~rcl~ht.:~ ,.~dl bc hcrc I'i~,:. X ~' i) .I t,, ."; ~'~, .. I. ~.Jr JJll~gCl ~.'.;lltlcd l~ klk,~ Ibc rc(jmrClllCn[,, ,.d;l I'lr~.'l'u'.Jil,;t ' J)~.f[I,..' ti,iL':' I...'.l),,.LlCd IJlcl¢ ;ir~' Ill) Sl;lllll(ir.~ rc(jHircl't,Eiil'.. 111 IJic J~.'t'lll',, i~J';i ',.(lIlllllCcl"., (.]\ ci Nil"., ~.Jl' IJlC I'llc .J,.'Jl;HIHIclll~. Ill (llll II;llllllJ ;li'L' ~.OtlIHJ~JE[. There ;irc 11~ I'C(JlHFClIh.'IiP~ Ih;Il '~;1% ;I \oJlIIIIC..'I Jl;l'~ Jl~ h;l\,J Iii...' JlllJ Jl~ll lllllil CI;IN% Jl;I (JCJl;iFIlII~Ill t').E(OlllC'...i j);lld I"lfc (J~J).llllllCllJ IJlcII IJI~..'IC I., ;I '.,I;lllll~r'~ ILJJIHICIIICIII ll~.ll OIICC ;111 Illdlll(Jll;IJ l", Jllr~.'r.J ;iS ;I ~)~ll(.J I'~rc I~,_'hl,.'r JJlc'. IIIil'~l ;ICJllk."~ ~.' Iht -ll~J h~,lr 16G 1 Ih;Il Ih~r,: ar~ d~p;ittm,.'nl., in th,: ~.tllott Ih,il ,don t r.'gms~ ;m', l,.",,,:l ,,d thHH,U'..' ( h;.I I'~*..!ll?ll¢/ ',,f;llCd th;it C('Jlt~,id~'rc'o ~,¢hlltt,.:,dr or 1'.., thin Iii. IS', ;I paid ;l(lltCrCd lo ,.'~ ',,ohlllt¢,.'r I% II~ll p;lld II'',olII~'(HIL' I% I',',.'lll? p;ud Ih,:', Ihcrs: ;I ddl..'r~no,:" l),;m~ t:l;l~ sT;ll~(.l II',ln uMIxldu;ll'n Gl;Irk responds lo ;Ir,..: Itlq(lt~;tl :'dr f'~,p¢,~. I',.1 '¢,;IHf,J(j h'l ~. I1,~,,', Il lh,.;pJ ;Ir.' sl).',.tl;',, r'~,I~llru.'lltt-'llts or L',III h;l\~d ;ltl ~?v'{)(' L. glllli~.;,tl,~ll ( I.,:l I",,dll;'m.:/ %l;ll~(I ',sh,.ll Il,: ',hIll. Il Il, ,',.I, Il,,.: IHII% I.Ih ,.~:llll'l~.'(I sl;ll~ dcl);~rlHiu'nt nl,d :'~J",, ¢~1 Ih~. it,zs, mll.l h,i;,,; ;~l 1,,.';i,.,t Ih,.: Pol)¢)~.igl ;Is}'.s:d II th,: *,~dtlltl,.,;rs ,11 Ih.; nt,llh~ll th;d p. II d.ts Il:nc :dl td II1.' ..'rlll'l~:ithql'-, Ih.;~. lIO,2ll ~,tl~h ;Ix [!Vt)(' CI.'d P.(,(Ir~;,.~/ kl,ll,.cj .Il I..1',1 ~'l~",,,d Ill~' xldlllllu.'uf'n ,".1l I',lp,,~,l,.I ',l.ll.d .,I I~..1'.1 ,":, ,il thc ~,()llllfl,;;.'[s ¢'hlcl ['"()(hl,-,ll,;/ M;It~,ll III,.',, all P.II st;lIed III tll~ I);Isl Il,,.:,, did I,,I th.', d,, li~,,,s /'c~lll;lIl()ll~. shll.; ;lll(I .(~HIII', OIl Ih,~ Ishllld. P,]II I's,.hp.z'.d:l (hr(. Nhddh.'hr.~d.. [),;~.,.~' ('l;~fl.. ('hl.'l P,,drl,.,l]v/ h~ v.. -][ Iht rd;md b~ll Ii,.,; Is ;I 19;lid li~,;l~;.,hl~r m4 ,I ~.(,ttlfll...I ',.If jhl.,.,.'l ~,,.,llll~.lj I~ ~.lll,~.~, ,I Ii. IH.,. I., ,l s~,llllllcC! iii' I% sllu' ;lIt ~Tr j'vp.s h.I ,r,l..d ol th.. h,.f p.~-,,m,,..I ~h,t Iix,; ,,n thc Isl;Hu.l ,llld ;l(,:l IIIdl*.tdl];lll',,. ~u'l IItlo Ih,.' ~l;Itlt41 III;11i Ih,,: IIH',.k ;HId (Ill',,,; ;1','~;1', Poi)os I~;I ;is~.,,..'L] iF,ill lll~.ll~ IdH ,Is h,Jd thc ;~u¢,."-,'., ,,;cd,."' ('hl¢l' Rudl ~I~.CII t',) X1r Ps,;hz,.:¢d;I hx ("hr~. Xhddl,:br..k It h~,¢'n oll thc l,.Lmd mid II~ I*schl,'od;I b..:'h lIT.' I:*~o}.,..md h,~d lh;m ;il h¢11~¢ ',x:t', It) I)f~'x UIII ho¢l.,s x~crJ },,.'id ill ,I t'iI.; .;it,in .I s~h, II .h~ h),~., lh.'nl h(lliic Ihcx smd [{\f:~ ss;is I l u ,,, m,.:' t:;ipcr',sorL ;tit ;i[')Ol'.l~) ~',;l". l\',~l.J It, ;Ill ;t~u'Hd;i (.)tlCSII'.)II I'rt.;lll Iht I1,',,.~r Il Ih,.'r0 IS ;)It ;i~,Ziid,I box', ~';lil IIh:'~ ro, p?l..I si Ih.'. ,.I,~ 11oI h.r,c Ih,: ,ihi]lp. klto~.~, '¢. h;ll i% ?IIIIL' to h~ i)11 I11~' .12.Zlld. I ' .\l'l~'f ;I dl.,~.lin.lOll II ~.',;IS (I~.l~r,l~ll,~',.I I1,.' .l'.'Cll(.I;i ~'.o, dd hv ;i',;ul;lld.; I(.~ Ih4 i:mhh~, lhr,.,I;:'h lhu I'~:..' J:ronl th,,: Ilo~)r A l')IcL~dcnl Jt;l',;, bcull c:'-,l:lJ~Jp.,Ji~(.J ill Ih;it ;i %;lllI,j. HIP",, lllCth~;IJ ,lll(.l ~ll",, I'IIC ,'\ IIIC(II',. l% ,I r~'.,,t~r.c lit,il I~ lI,Jul, lc(,J Ii,lc ",'%..' IllltlJ ti Ik :]J'~J)l'u',,,,.'tJ Jr, lJl..'l,' J~r'..' ~t)llllttl',,~dtll[ \T,'~., I'¢;IJJ', tJU litli Jl;l~,¢ ;ill', ;J~ll~:' ,~lJJ~1 IJl~ll ;111 pf'tiJ)',)'.;IJ "r'(.lll JJ~l%C Jl..';~i'd ct}i'r.~r.:lJ?, ll'lJlc~, Jl;l'~ ~ ;I c;]lJ :ii IJl~.' ',,(~llJJl Cli~.J ',Il Ih,.;li tJl~lth. I. lilt', ',',(HlJtJ [ll,~ pCt')J')l¢ J'rt)lll Iici',..' Ill ;](Jtllllt)[i ll)tit,.' i')¢t~pl,,: I'rt,lll ~[;lll()lt I.}l;inc J:l~.._'~ -,;ltd Ill,..", h,i',c lU.)l j)lu,, id,.'d I'~l.tH;tJ .:', l(.Icll~.c ul ,,', h:lt lh~.", ~,,,,,~ld plU: i:lc J[:f'CJill III.' J"JLl~.~r I~ J';~l ~.~ij)Jc'~ ~.HiI.,_, Itl j)r,~: p.J,.' cIii,JI ?,,.'lie', Ill,,..'[.h,..;ll xcl', h.."," [)l;lll~ J~"l;I.~ Il IJllll~d~ '.1~1% Ill,,: ~','l'. lilt% ;irC. thor..' ~,', Ill b,.' ll~.~ cji. Ill?..' II ;I ,,.,,,lll;.J.I I', ',i%ll~'(I '.:llh J;;IM ,N;H'~Ic'., tJl~r~ ',',,Il b,.' ll~ ~.;Ir;.l:,,,.',,.' Ih,it ;I .r',l;ll IJlll~d Jl~r,c (.)ll~,ll¢)ll I'D,~III !lit II,~r \\ IJJ ',',',.' ;1", r~",~dcHl'-,, Jl;l',,..' ;lit', iIIi)lll :1,. h~ Ibc J'flhtl NIl' J~;IgC - ,'~,l IJl~ h,',t t']~l~,l ,N;IJ)J,,.?, ('Ulllliil',.,fUli fll.',..'lllJ~ c~lh..'l Ih,,:~, r, lll Il,l:,..' h~ h,l',c ',J)'..'cl~ll IIi¢CIIII~ O~'JJl~ blld'?.:l Itllllll'~,..'~'., ~lllJ. J JJJC', :',;lilt h} '.,~ Ih;ii F"rt)lll Ill,.: II,,),,~r Il",,,]. ;,., ;f bu;~rd Itt Ih)l ;i.~r¢~.'(.J ',:]lit IJlq J)p, Jj)u%;lJ ~.'.Jl;lt v, tll Jt;lJ)J)',.'l[ d~ll'l I'¢~.'J Ih~ ~.~lL~p~.',,~J p, Ill IJIc J:~-",l IIHcrc,,l tll'lh¢ J:lh.' ('U.II~I I)i,tr~l ul' I~l~'~,, [:r(llti Iii,,: I],,,,. \\ h,~ ~., rlllilllll~ ',.',Il;il ;lll(.J '.~liu ill;Ikc'., th,.' I'llt;~l ..I,.'L;i,~ilHi * I I',.'...'J '.:4 Il;l:,.: iisi I.F. llt. Ih;il IJl¢ 16G 1 h~okm~ ;[[ [I.% SHtl;lllOl~ IS ;tX thc rcq.~ ul Iht hlc'~ ul' (';,p[~ [:,re .A.d~ ,.,,~ (~,,~.d '[ hc [~,,;.d ~l' ('()IIHI~I%MOIIur% h;t%C rcqmrcd hi;ill h* l~.t,k ;~l thc %lhl.d]~)l) ~%(,IL ~llh ['.r.I ?..qd~'. h, ItlOIIC% '~ [)i;IIIC F]H~'~' '] Ilu j~,;l/(] Ill,Is I~,',~ ,11 tied I,,,p,,',:d ,md ,,nul th~x s~.HH Ihmu', h~ I~llhllII fcf~r~lldnnl f'ront thc ~h)~r II I:;,.t N;iplcs C(,ll~s In N~III [hc~ I;Ikc t)llr %Ir Jhlo~cl N'CN. Il:o', x~;:I:l t.lr kt,JtllllcCrn Nit Pol]oXlcl ,,NIi(:INol illlSuOll,;cpll:Hi In Ih:il IIHn bU:lld ~i.:ll(I hc d:q:;l::dcd Ih.ii ~:.::ld Ii::l h:ll)l)cn From INR Ill,or Nk Il;Il ;Ib~llll IIIc llll'[.ISllll~'lll~ Ih;il I~ Ilcro" NJr JJuj)l)NICi Jl NS~.lJd rOlll:llll Ii~f~. lJlcx ;lie IlldliN lJllllpx Ih;il ~NllJ Ii:lNC l~l J)c ~N::ILc~J i}llJ Nit J)(il)O~ ICI J II;IX~ ~1 (Julck (jllo.lhm h~r Iho ('lllcJ'. ;ihuul IIl~ I):~;ll. ~Nh~lc did II C;lj};ICll~ ho/o ;ii Iht Sl;lllpll" Mr Huc~el - A (jtlCqllOll J~/r JJl;lll~" l, Ih;il I:~l;ll IlinlllOd nu ~C ;irc IlOl lCSlJ, illslhJc Jul Il" C'hi~l'f~odn~ucz EIHc h;is ;ink Lis h~ ~'x;~lLl:~lc ~1 1~ Ihclll ~lr Poi)ox ~ci Is Ihc[c ;m)Ihlll~ ~ls; ~c nh~.ld kll~)~ ;ih~,ll ~'~' %hunld hc h.ld ,iii, Jill 16G 1 h,.';~d ol'thc bo;]rd I rcqu,.:?,lcd Ibc I]lcd .";()',,¢Hibcr ,~ [)l;lltC h;~d 5¢Jii lollers NO~ll'~b,.~l' Il)''' ',;iJJJ ;i £ollo,,~ tip J¢licr ~lr ttl~cgcl There nrc ~ p<oplc on Ihis bu;~rd 'ih;il ',',,;i% Jll~ ll[;lll~]~lle Pcl.;r J'L,.',,.JI,. I .~,.J, Iht ('hf¢l' (:'Jldl|llJ 1:1 '0i~,;,,l-~', [JILl ',UH ;l',J', IHt" ~,T, Il',, did ',~nl I'llC ~1 ,,.;,~mlpl.llI~t ,J:.' ~:l~-I Ill.' ' i'~lll{T", ~(.J ri;,2 t$iIIIIIJ,E'. J),*~(.J Jl:l~J ;l",k '~d, lll ~C','..'I';I] IIIIIC", J(i J'}rJ)', Il.J,,; IJic C'Ji;lJllll;lll ;,k. ~.l~J,c'. '~ (HI ,irc I;fJklll~ t)rl.~'lll:lJ'-, ',~)fl ~,;;inlc~.J k.'pJ)lC'., J Ji,~xc .~JJ~l.:-, J ~.I',C Jlllll ~.UJ]I~."., Jill ('h;llrlll;lll ~&,k),~J%c% ~',t~I Il'tiC Icl (.'Jlf,.'l ~J~, ',,&HI IIiJi l'Ct;lltl ',,.~TJ)lk.'", I)J' alii IIIc IIIIIIIIIC% \~ Ileal ',',~' :',.'1 II~lllfllc%, ~,~,HI .Ecl ;I L'I)I)? ('h;llrnl;ifi ~\ ~.',~J.c', I Ii,Il ~-, ',,',hun hc p~,..I,,cd Ihcul Ifp hJnJ~cll Ih,H ~',, ~h,: ',~Jl.h Ih.', ',',,.'lc ,",Ir J'Jlf~cJ JJ,EIC ~tHI J'.flu'~, IIIIs I~, ;I ",ct', '.,ltl:Ill ~.Ullllli[ll]ll'~ ll,,lt (']ll..l~',, Ih..;lc ,IfC I"1',~' petal)lc mt lilt bu'll'd, ',,~,',.T ;Irc ,dl ~,.",l),~n.,d'dc lu ~,(}tl ;,11 I[~]1 ~.)lll', IItLII', I(JlJ;ilJ', b~i ;,', ;~ h,'.~,.J ~,', hen ',~,l J'~rlIIp Phil I-'crc I~,.'~ClL I dldn'l c;Ji"c Il II,o', ',',crc u~'L'.:ln;fl Ul ~l)lc',, Ih;d I',, Ill-ill;ftc: ~,~I .\ ,,c~.~fl~.l IhllL,,.:' I ~,',;ml rcm;~rk on ~, ',~ .,;lid Ih;Il i');d look thc [lillll~lc'., I~]r ,,;II'c k,:Cl)lm, ';,,il.' ~, ..pinL' Ir,mi ~h;if" ,~llkl b~. ',~,Jl;ll ;llllJl¢~i"lJ~, (.I(ic~, P, lJ Jl;i;c h)COllh..' Iii ;ilia .rClll~l\ ~' IJlc IIIlllllJC'% JJ~]lll IJll~ ~l.lt.,,JI ',,.IIJI~Hll Illl'~ffllllli?. IJl~.' ('Jllk~r ,",,Ir Jh[ct'..'l %,~, h~n ',~.c h,l',C ,i I]l¢Clln'..' I~;ll ',~.tuth. I tin Ibc Inlm]l~". ;flu. J .I. v,,ml,.t I.~J..c thc J),,~uk'., Jlt]nl¢ Ih;il %~,;t~, ;lit ,lllt~.~lll;lll~. IJ)lll~ III.Il ~.',;1', (J~.Jllk.' J'l)l NC;il.- ;IIILI %~;ll'., 'J hr, ],, ,f -m.',,i.' hill.' ~.~Plltlllllllll? tit;Il X~,;l", q,~.'r',, CIo~,2 imlll ;t hlllc ',,,hilt J',,i.,,.k 16G 1 Mr Pclc Pc~c Koc~k \Vhm diS{{:'re.c..: il' il ~s mc or Ed. rcq.csli.g Ihcm f.r ('{'i;lirlll:lll kVool'~J',. ¥("~11 x~cr¢ ~'.;.:mu.' Iht orl~,ln;ll lilts sir I{l'.J'.,C Illllllllcs. d,d ',o. ;,'J.. I'o~ cuplc'." Pcic Kt~cik Ail', f¢lrlll o[Ih¢lli'~ (.'h;lirnl;m ~,Vools~.'x [)ltl %Oll ;l~k for Pelt Koc,k ] n..k liw Ih,: ('h;lll'lll;lll T,~. t',l~l',s..", ~ 01{ :,~.J.. I't,f Itl~' {'clcKoclL I;l~k I'~,rlhc (.'h;lirnl;iil ~,\ ookc.', /\lid ~oli ~,lll;¢d lite ofi~l{I;ll Illilllll¢ ;,ro.nd .".is FI;l?g g,,:t ULI{]ICN of list fllllSllICN C'~cr~ {ll,)lllll. romin,:l.x ;md ;,{~;ns Il.,,, ,',.{r Jo{]' {);i,_'c Nil ',,.¢ don'l Front ll,C Ih. lot I rcql,c'.,Icd [rs. iii .\h' Ih.,i},,~', I~.h ;lild h',.' '.,:{Id ll,.I I~fohl~.:l,I 1.'I ilia' c;lll I'~;,I ;{lid ',~c t\lll II;1~,¢ {hCIII Isere /%.1 X iii) ()'C]'..)Ck iii Iht C\CIIIII~. hc c:,llcd lliC ,,,, h;ll is h;l[)pclll~lg I')lll I C;lllll()l .l~,~l Ihclll Ill \('Il It)ll;It. 'l h;il \\;1% Ill,..' t',' I ~:.d n. I)n,hlcm. fil;l~.hC iomorrm~ h fo.:k mcr ~ x~ccks. ;md i;mll Is,d;l~ I Mr Illlcgcl If;inx.llc Ii;.~ ;i prvlqcll, I iix.' llcl.' klR'~v. Ph,I x(m h;nc tJ.'OII¢ h) lite t'~;lil~', ,ll:d I,l}!',Vd h~ Phil [)¢IC Koclk It h~ok :t I't.m;ll rcll,l~.'xt hll ;ltl Il,.: It,il,l,lc~, hi I)C rUhlrl,~'d ,Nh Jci]' Parc Th.I is, ilOl Irll.2 I ~,l- I,~lc s~ I,c. ";Lip kit th~c,._'cl Cop,cs ('ls;i,rm:,,~ \Vookcx Thc Nlr Jeff' P;~gc I had r¢cclxcd Iht C~,l)lC~ {thll IllOiltlil.~. ;lild c:dlcd I[,c ,.Olllll~. ;llh,rll~"s ;lll!.l I~;id licl c:dl Skip Mr J¢11' P:nz'c 'I he Inpc,, ~,¢rc dch~crcd Iht '~ I ' ~.'.lllll'g lO brlll~ ~.Olll,.:lhll~ ;1',,;1iI;11'~1,,2'. v.,,j %,.;1111 ILl lll;IkC '~llle I1', III I1",, Ifil.' l'~'.rl~ 'i h~ll v., h(','~'~ [ iiIl~.lcl".l;llit[ II sohio lllld,2l'l.',lll~ I;l~.h)[', ~.',h% Ih,,.",, ",~,¢r,,: II~.ll L),4111'~ hl()ll;'hl I"Hllh..[Hlllll~' I ',1'' ll',~l hchc~c ;IIP. J [ P,:IIIICl;IIC do nOl b,Jh¢,.,.' Ih,II Il' there ;irc ;m.', Ul~dcrl)lll~ facl~r.,. ~1 ,,i.~,, mil Ill ~ll[',,rm Iht llnbl~c I~¢I¢ K[x:l~ Phd ',,i, lll %'~cI'~ %:1)111~.~ Ih;il Ih¢1¢ ',,,cie C(lll,...'lll,~ ;Ill, mi lilllllll.", h,.lll!, ll~Jl ,dh.'l,:d hid ,%Ir t:d }IH,,:::<I II ,,Ira I~c'~l ~!.,lll ;1[I ;11 hc h~l', I~cCll h~'l,.' ,~ I,~11:, l~mc ,~Hd h. ~., .~ lc.il Nit PIHI iMi),~ I~ V,c .h,mld ~cl I);~.1,,,.'1 uf ~l h:ll Ill,: ..un.hlJ~C I:1~ I'~ ~l h,H Ibc ~l*.t;llll/;lllnll '-, ~h;lllcr ',~c ;Irc ',Ul)l)~,,c I~ hm, c :dl nl'lln', i'}rcc(m~.'¢l,.cd kll(~lcdF,: II %~,;1',,11 I IIIIlll I[IIC,.: HluHIh', ;I.v.t~ Ih;d ,,',c ~,,11~'~, rcnm',¢d f'ruH] :] h,,..k,:d I,l'l~cc ;,nd phi i)HI Il,.'/,..' ~1,.'[.' Iht,, .h~,nld [l~,l h,~l,: hc.H ' Frolll Ibc l]ooi ',\Il', lIl~l Ill ;I %~'ClII~'LI ('ht¢£R(~dr~uv/ 'lln,, ~,,, clm',ld¢~ci.l ;~ ',,:~.urcd iff;icc ('h:urIHml \\l,,,I,,', I'}h ~1 ~'..' ('hlcr Rodrl~nc/ V, ,2 IH~,~,.'d Ihclll ,,llll h~ IbP, dc',k Iici,' Fr,,ml file lll~r '~'~l~ kll(~\~ l~ll.,.J'~.'r h;is,: Ih¢ ~d'licc I't~l ~mr Nlr Ilu,:.,.'cl \Vim H,,¢', Ih,.' o11icc' ('h~cf Rodr~,..:ncz V,c :llj bill ~.li~h CUllJllll~.'lltlll ~,:llh bo.ghl Ibc mi')cs. ;md th;il h;ipp¢..~ 1o be ill5 rcc()rd,,,:r. II llO~ h;ll)l)cll~ Io b~onic public properly, mid I don'l cilrc Ih;il d(~ll'l Ili;l~c ;111~ di~rcncc, bill Ibis ~IiII]'~;1~ IIIIi1{ ih;il ~;~ rccord~(I m~ lil~ I;Ip~. Oll Iii) recorder From Ibc ~oor Thank ,o. for IIIc doli;lli~HI OJ IJlc t;IJ)C rccordcr Jcr~ ~1;Iflll;l[O (';111 J I11:1~ il IllOJlOll I0 ;~dJotiHI XIr Phd Pol)o~ic~ I ~c~o.d Nlccl ~llg ;tdjo.rncd i'{ cspc(,.I f. I I.',. Mll)llillicd. JJ;irb;ir;i [~,ro~m 5~ ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE RESCUE ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA DECEMBER 4TM, 1997 CIIIEF'S REPORTS: A. OPERATIONS REPORT B. VOLUNTEER REPORT C. TRAINING REPORT D. BUDGET REPORT OLD BUSINESS IMPACT FEE STATUS (Commander Page) EAST NAPLES PROPOSAL NEW BUSINESS CONFLICT OF INTEREST ISSUE FUND RAISING FUTURE EMS STAFFING BOARD AND CITIZENS' OPEN DISCUSSION CIIIEF'S REPORT DECEMBER 4, 1997 1 OPERATIONS REPORT lahn or Capri FLr~ Department i~r-sormel pr~dde 24 ho~tr emergency fervices for th~ Isles of Capri of at ~t ~ ~y irate ~ Fl~fl~ter h azd~ to ~ fl~ ~fJt~ From R:~ p.m. ~ R:00 a.m. a medial eme~, ~~.9~d~~ trod p~foJJl~h ~sp~d wl~ an ave~ of 3 lo 4 m~. Addlt~, ~ IJ[~ of Cap.Co.er C~ Em.~ ~ EM~ ~w ~a ~e ~ly Advt~ l.lfe ~p~ ~lpp~ ~tt ~ Collar C~. ~ m~a~ ~ a m~l eme~, be It · h~ atf~k or ~tk ~u~, can be ~ndl~ wJ~ ~ mo,/~ em~ m~lcal ~q~flpm~t ~d medl~fl~ ~lnf t p~ of~ Ca~r C~iy Eme~ ~s Dept~ ~s ~ fl~ and Thf~ Isles of Capr-I Fh~ I~.par'tmen! welcarnes ~ {o s~ by ~e sta0~ for f~ bm~d p~sm~ ~ We JIM p~de ~me ~d ~ fl~ p~v~d~ ~p~ alii ~ ~ chases. We ~f~ ~ve J p~ for ~ ~mo~ det~ and we ~O ~{al] ~me for y~ We ~ to ~ld a yenr~t~ ~ ~ lfaH~ and ~ s~4 ~k for~ ~me~m~ ~ D~mber wh~ Snn{a ~e vlsl~ Isles of Cap~ ~e depa~m~{ ~a adop~ Cap~ ~levnrd for t~sh plc~p ~d we a~ Mso ~olved In ~e wate~ng of~ palm ~ ~ p~ 1996 1997 NOV. 1997 ACI'UAL FIRES 4 6 I VEIIICLE 2 2 S'rRUCTURE 0 I 0 BRUSH 2 3 0 FIRE A LA PJ',YS 9 6 I OTI[ER FIRE-RELATED CALI~S I I1 2 TOTAL MILDICAI.IRIL~;CU~ CALLS (GROUND) 79 84 B TOTAL MEDICAL/RESCUE CALLS (MaRne) 55 74 6 ]~JCQU'E.ST ~ AN<YrH]CR FIRm'. DEPAP. TMXJNT FOR IYfUTUAL 6V~OVE L~S) 24 16 0 TOTAL FIRE DOLLAR LOSS 0 0 0 VOLUNTEER REPORT The Isles of Caprt Flr~ Department c~mtlrme~ to p~de ~ ~mm~ wl~ ~e ~t ~1 of~ AH fl~ depa~ ~1 m~t ~ ~ per m~ ~ ~m~y ~ ~m ~I0 p.~ far tm~ln~ To d~te, we ~v~ 16 vo~ ~d 2 p~d pem~l, ~ b~ ~ to~l pem~l m 18. ~ of ~ I P~rsm~k F~r~, 7 E~'s ~d I ~mt R~der. ~ h a b~ ~ase from 1996 ~ ~ nmber ~d ~el of ~ pe~L EI~ pe~t ~0%) of ~ c~h am Medlc~e~e ~d ~ ~t (20%) m tim ~hte~ ~ Is~s of Cap~ FI~ Depa~ffit nl~ assbt ~e Unlt~ S~{es Cotst G~rd, C~ Att Pt~I, ~da Mi~ Patrol, Collier Cmm~ ~s ~, Napes Pol~lm Depn~t, ~ wi~ nil tim dept~ ~ ~ Collar C~. ~ mufti aid ~m{~ Is ~ aS~m~t be~ aH eme~ ~e a~ TOTAL # OF VOLU?'rI'EERS CERTIFIED VOLU'NTE ERS: # OF FULLY CERTIFIED FIREFIGIFfERS (400 HOUR COURSE) # OF FTREFICHTFJUBAS'IC (56 flOUR COURSE) # OF PARAMEDIC FIREFI~ITERfBASIC # OF EMT'S # OF FIRST RESPONDER TOTAL # OF CURRENT VOLUNTEERS 1t5 1~6 I~TTODATE 17 16 0 5 2 0 ! 4 7 1 TOTAL TRAINING HOLrRS NOVEMItER'$ TRAINING: DAT E: 11/13/97 l 1/20/~/ I 1/27/97 TRAINING REPORT JAN-DEC 19<)6 I08 1997 TO DATE I05 SPECIFIC ~G 17~'VOLVF_~: Vehlc3e Fir~/Car and Van SPECIFIC TR/kINE~G IN~VOLVED: ~earx'h & Rescue SI~ECIF~C TRAINING INVOLVED: No Trninlng "Thanksgiving" 16G 1 BUDGET REPORT TOTAL BUDGET LAST YEAR (FY 1997): $148,280.00 A.MOUNT E~2~'DED ~ YEAR (Iry 1997): $136,~.00 TOTAL BUDGET THIS YEAR (FY 1998): $163,200.00 EXI~NDITUR~ YEARTO DATE: $ 10,053.96 COLI,I'F~R COUNTY Fl'RE CONTROL DISTRICT FUND ALLOCATIONS: FY 1996 F3( I997 FY' 1998 S4,0OO.O~ $12,000.00 S31,~00.00 re~;r~'C¢l nil lilt n~:~rinc re~¢,~ c~llq rh~( Iht I~1C? nf {]'~1'ri hn~l ~'~ ¢c~pn-d('d In frn~n were rl,~pOIJdCd C~Ic.lafc~ Ih~l CHIEF'S REPORT NOVEMBER 14,1997 16G' OPERATIONS REPORT Isles of Capri Fire Department personnel pr,,vi,le 24 hour emergency services for the Isles of Capri community with.a consis.tent ave~gC._~e~po~s.~.fl_iH~.~.f~_to~ ~invt_~$. From 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. a mininm:n of at least ,me fully st.tv codified Firefighter is assigned to thc fire station. From 8:00 p.m. to 8:00 a.m. a minimum of at least one Paramedic/ Fircfighter Basic is assigned to thc fire st.tion. In the event ora fire or medical emergency, ~._minimgm 0[[Wo~Ed_gE~S[~tl}y.t!~ree trained professionals respond within an average of 3 to 4 minutes. Additionally, thc IMes of Capri/CollierCounty Emergency Semites EMS/FIRE now h:m the only Advanced Life Suppo~ equipped boat in Collier County. This means th.t a medicM emergency, be it a h,~a~ attack or traumatic inju~, can be handled with the most advanced e~nergency medical equipment and medications. Being a pa~ of the Collier County Emergency Services Depa~ment enhances the fire and medical care that all Isles of Capri residents receive; with_NQ_~jp~xffa~. The Isles of Capri Fire Departtnent welcomes citizens to stop by the station for free blood pre.sure checks. We also provide home and condo fire prevention inspections, along with CPR classes. We curreutly have a program for fr.e._e smoke detectors and we will install these for you. We continue to hold a yearly-haunted house on tlalloween and you should look for us sometime in December when Santa Clause visits Isles of Capri. The department has adopted Capri Boulevard for trash pickup and we are also involved in the watering of the palm trees recently planted. 1996 1997 OCT. 1997 ACTUAL FIRES 4 6 0 [TOTAL) VEttlCLE 2 2 O STRUCTURE 0 1 0 BRUStl 2 3 0 FIRE ALARMS 9 6 0 OTHER FIRE-RELATED CALLS 1 10 I TOTAL MEDICAL/RESCUE CALLS (GROUND) 79 75 9 TOTAL MEDICAL/RESCUE CALLS (MARINE) 55 70 4 REQUEST BY ANOTHER FIRE DEPARTMENT FOR MUTUAL AID [MOVE UPS) :24 15 1 TOTAL FIRE DOLLAR LOSS 0 0 0 1 VOLUNTEER REPORT The Isles of Capri Fire Department continues to provide the comm,nity with the highest level of service. All fire department personnel meet three times per month on Th,r~day nights from 6-10 p.m. for training. To date, we have 16 volunteers and 2 paid personal, which brings the total per~aonnel to 18. l~lany of the members are cross-trained. The sixteen volunteers consist of 5 fully certified Fire fighters, 2 Firefighter/Basic, 1 Paramedic Firefighter/Basic, 7 EMT's and 1 First Rcspondcr. This is a big increase from 1996 in the nunlber and level of trained personnel. Eighty percent {80%} of our calls arc Medical/Rescue and twenty percent (20%} are fire related. The Isles of Capri Fire Department also assists the United States Coast Guard, Civil Air Patrol, Florida Marine Patrol, Collier County Sheriff's Office, Naples Police/Fire Departmeut, along with all fire departments located in Collier County. This mutual aid interaction is an agreement between all emergency service agencies. TOTAL ~ OF VOLUNTEERS 1996 1997 TO DATE I7 16 CERTIFIED VOLUNTEERS: ~ OF FULLY CERTIFIED FIREFIGHTERS {4OO tlOUR COURSE} # OF FIREFIGHTER/BASIC {56 HOUR COURse;E) # OF PARAMEDIC FIREFIGHTER/BASIC # OF EMT'S # OF FIRST RESPONDER TOTAL · OF CURRENT VOLUNTEERS 1 7 1 TOTAL TRAINING tlOURS OCTOBER'S TRAINING: DATE: 10/O0/07 10/23/97 I0/30/97 TRAINING REPORT JAN-DEC 1996 108 SPECIFIC TRAINING INVOLVED: 1997 TO DATE 9O Fire ground drills SPECIFIC TRAINING INVOLVED: Extrication/Car Fire Burn SPECIFIC TRAINING INVOLVED: l~led-Flight DrilI/AED Recert. ' 16G 1 BUDGET REPORT TOTAL BUDGET LAST YEAR (FY 1997): $148,280.00 AMOUNT EXPENDED LAST YEAR {FY 1997): $136,488.00 TOTAL BUDGET TillS YEAR {FY 19981: $163,200.00 EXPENDITURES YEAR TO DATE: $7,708.00 EXPENDITURES PENDING: On January 9, 1996, a contract was fin:tlized to lease purchase a 1987 Chevrolet Fire Truck from East Naples Fire Department. Throughout the negotiations between the Isles of Capri Advisory Board and the East Naples Fire Chief part of the agreement included one-year free maintenance on the truck. This part of thc agreement was never added to the contract. The East Naples Fire Chief did riot recall such an agreement. In October ol 1996, a water leak was discovered along with a vibration problem. Throughout the time the truck was in possession of the Isles of Capri Fire Department, the truck was never used on any fires. The truck went into the East Naples Fire maintenance shop on December 18, 1996. The problem was bif. ger than first thought and remained in the shop until .July 7, 1997. This pending expenditure to the East Naples Fire Department is approximately $ 7,592. COLLIER COUNTY FIRE CONTROL DISTRICT FUND ALLOCATIONS: FY 1996 FY 1997 $ 6,000.00 $ 12,200.00 FY 1998 $ 31,800.00 10/30197 11/2197 11/2197 1115/97 1117/97 11/8/97 11110/97 11/15/97 Isles of Capri Fire Ground Response Slaffing Levels From 01101,'97 - 11/20/97 Vehicle Accidenl-951 at CG Slalion 131 Hilo SI.-OD w/Xanax Stand-by f'or Med-Fligh! Vehicle Accidenl-951 al CG Slation Fire alarm-# 100 La Peninsula Unk Type Problern-CG Stalion(Trouble Bread'dng Vehicle Accienl-951 ,"'it CO Slalion ( School Bus) Vehir;l(: Ar, cirJ,,:rd-95 i & Capri Bv 17 calls were responded to v,,;th jusl 1 person. 53 calls were reopondr:d lo wilh 2 pesonnel 37 calls were rospor'l(Jed to wihh 3 personnel. 32 calls were reqpf)nderJ to with 4 personnel. 1.'~ ca:Is were responded to wi:h 5 personnel i call ',','as responded to v;ilh 7 personnel 2 calls were responded to ',.,,iCh 8 personr:ef 89% of ',he t~me. 2 or more F, ersnnnel responded. 60%of the lime. 3 or more personnel responded. 7/3,/97 7/3/97 7/10;97 7/11,'97 7/24,'97 7131/97 8/4197 814/97 8/.5/97 8/14/97 8/1.5/97 8/19'57 8/20/97 8/20/97 8/23/97 8/30/97 8/30/97 8/3~/97 8/3'1/97 9/"i/97 9/18;97 9/22/97 9/24/97 9/24/97 9/25/97 9/27/97 9/27/97 9/30/97 9/30/97 9/30/97 9/30/97 9/3O/97 10/1/97 10/3/97 10/3/97 10/3/97 10/5/97 10/9/97 10/9/97 10/10/97 10/10/97 10/'10/97 10/1 O/97 10/1 O/97 10/10/97 10/10/97 1C/16/97 10/17/97 I0/17/97 10/22/97 10/28/97 Insecl Bde 1 Tarpon Bay General S~o,'o- Sr'r,~ell of Smqke 2 181 Tahiti-Cat Fish Sfin9 2 Man Dov,,n-951 & 4 Lint' 3 Vehicle Accidenl-;'~o of Jolly Bridge 5 W/M F air:ted 4 415 Sqrl Jtl~n Av.- Head !njuW 2 150 Tahil~ Gl .We~! Fair Ch(ink 3 ~;0 La Perfinsutn- Eleclrical Fire 2 ~ t.;! sh~ck in the hand by a catfish 2 Public Ar, r,i:;t-ENFD DiM Mnn Df)wa - 95 Cofim St 2 Man Fell from Ladder 1 Man Fell [forfl Roof 3 102 Page PnL;o. Man Foil 3 Vehicle Accidenl-951 6 Capri Blvd 1 3~0 Capri BIv,I AFt 212-~ypoglycnmi;1 3 StrtJGfuro Fire-1558 Heights CI 4 .u~ruc,tir. Fire 4 MO/e Up Sla'ion 50- e, , , Man Fell- 480 Col;~er Blvd. 4 V,:h~gle Accidenl-951 & blainsml i 103 W Page Page-Man Dizzy 2 Man Fell from Bonl Dock possible Chesl Stand-By for Med-Fhghl Landing 5 Brush Fire-F~ddlers Creek 2 Move Up Sl~lion 50-Boat Fire Goodland 1 152 W. Page Pago-Tro:~ble Brealhmg, Collapsed Lung 3 387 Capri Bird -Lower Back Pain 2 Mod. Flight Stand-By 2 W/M with 2nd and 3rd degree burns 1o leg 4 Slnnd-By for Med-Flighl Landing 2 420 Penn/Ay -Tree Fire 3 Vehicle Accidont-95~ & Capri Bird 4 20 E Pelican St .Poss CVA 2 Stand-By for Med-f'~ight Landing 2 Vchiclo Accident.Capri B;vd 4 Vehicle Accident-951 5 Vehicle Accident-Capri Bird. 2 Stand-By for Med. F;igbt Landing Sla 90 Sunny Grove 6L F~rmc- Structure Fire 3 Sland-by Sla 23- Structure Fire 2 23! Ken Tiki Dr- Tr¢,nsfcrmer Blown 4 Tahiti Cir. W~res Arching 4 416 San Juan Ay .Transformer Blown 1 Vehicle Accidenh951 & Fiddlers Creek 4 Vehicle Accident-Marrio~ Club Dr & 951 3 94 Dolphin Cir-Gas Sprayed in Eyes 4 Tropic Schooner on Fair.z/ay-Man Down 3 Public assist-20 E. Pelican 2 Vehicle Accidenl-952 3 Publicassisl-20E Pelican 3 16G I Isles or' Capri Fire Ground Response Slnffing Levels Frsm 01 .S: ",,.7 - 11;20,57 3118;g7 3,20;97 3/2C;97 3/24/97 3/24/97 .3/31'97 4Ili97 4;1,'97 413/97 4/4;97 4,'4;9'; 4,'6,97 4/10;97 4,'13 97 4/1397 4/1497 4,'17,97 4/20.97 4,21,97 4/3S ~7 4/30,'97 5i2/97 5/3;97 5/3/97 5/3/97 5/4/97 5/4/97 5/5/97 5/5/97 5/5/97 5/6i97 5/8/97 516;97 5/13/97 5/13/97 5/'~ 5/97 5/18/97 5i21/97 5/22197 5/24/97 5/27/97 5/28/97 5/28/97 5/28/97 5/28/97 6/5/97 6/8/97 6/15/97 6tl 5/97 6/23,97 7/2,'97 BIeedinO from tire nose-.:25 Scmar St Medical Alarm-','/Page Page St Vehicle Accident-951& Boat Ramp Abdominal Para-t13 B Page Page Stahon 90.M, ed-Flir_:ht-Abdor'nhnal Pain St a,-'d.by-S~at~of 23 Heart, Attack. Coconut Island B,P Check-409 Capri Veh',c!,': Accident- On top Bridge SrnrflJ of Smoke-360 Capri B!vd S~ck Person-387 Capri B;/:; ,Move U;) To SInhon 23- Bru'.,h Fir'..' Move Up-Station 23 Smell of ,Grrlokc'- Pelican Sf Assault Victim-202 La Peninsul;I A,'C F~re-123 East Hilo f,10 ,".,' Lip- $t;'~hOrl 50 rof ttaZr'nat Cnll h;i ;ret; persr;r; aP, er Fa;hn'} ir;'.o Br)at-B~d'", !."arir',a Pdbi~cAsgisl ,Ctn~;~ :i 23 ,',,",r,./e Up E, rush Fire .Hardee SI Possible CVA-2O E Pelican SI V,-:h?-.le A. cci,,':le':l 951& 952 Vehicle Fire..g51&952 Fuel Slick-133 E. Hilo Sl. F~re Alnrm-L.a Peninsula Head h,jury- Snook h'lrl Brush F!re-SC:h & Miller ~.,'~o,,,e Up Sl;'ihorl 21'-ref ~rt,fsh F,re Snt~h. Move Up Stm 23- Fire Alarm Move Up Station 21-ref Fire Alarm Vehicle Acc!dent-951 i'q. of M;urv;ail Dr Fire Alarm- Krug Lake Move Up-St;dion 21 PoosCVA-85 St Ar,,drev,'s #;05 Vehicle Fire 951 & Porl.o-Prir:ce Marco Boat RarnF-,",tJng Ray Sting Vehicle Accident-1 rniie i",!. of the Jolly Bridge V'/alk-in VVave Runner Accident Hypertension -CCSO Marco Sub F~re Alarm-L::] Pr, ninsula t',*,c,ve Up Slalion 50- Slruclure F~re Pul)Irc Assist Medical ;'.latin-831 Scolt Dr Fire Alarm- 133 Vintage Bay Dr #5 E Pelicg, n St.- Injured Person Vehicle Accide:~t-Mamsail & 951 231 Capri Bird - Back Ir'jury from Boaling Accident 95I Boal Ramp-Female Fainted Move Up Staticn 23-Brush Fire Sable Pa:r'n Arching Pov,,erfine 16G li Isles of Capri Fire Ground Response Sial!lng Levels From 01/01/97 - 11/20/97 DATE 1t2/97 1/9t97 1t9/97 1/9/97 1/13/97 1/13197 1,15/97 1/15/97 1/16/97 i/~9/97 t;19,97 li19/97 1/i 9¢97 1/22/97 1/22/97 1/26;97 1/26/97 2/2197 2/2/97 2/2'97 2/2,'97 2/5;97 2/.5/97 2/5;97 2/12/97 2/12/97 2!14,'97 2f15/97 2/17;97 2/17/97 2,'18/97 2/19197 2/20/97 2/20/97 2/20/97 2/20/97 2/22/97 2/28/97 2/28/97 314197 3,'6/97 3/7/97 317;97 3/7/97 3/8/97 3/9197 3;10/97 3,'11/97 3/17/97 CALL TYPE # Responding Struclure Fire In Easl Naples Districl-Muhml Aid 7 62 y/o Trouble Breathing 6 Med-Flighl Stand-By 3 Fire Alarm-La Peninsula 2 Vehicle Acciden! 951& 952 2 Shoo!icg ~ Septembers on Marco-Mulual Aid 2 Possible CVA.La Peninsula 3 82 y/o Fell l. titfing Head 3 54 y/o Diabelic 4 Do','zned Powerline of! Pelican SI 2 Powerline Arching 2 Broken Leg From A Fall 4 Meal. Flight Sland-By 4 Bonl Fire off East Page Page 2 vehicle Acc/riehl 951& Mainsail 2 87 ylo Trouble Breathing 5 Med-Flighl Stand-By 5 Vehicle Accidenl 951 4 Move Up To Glalion 23.Mulual Aid 4 Vehicle Accident Wes!Winds&4 l.Mtdual Aid 4 Brush Fire 4 Move Up To S~alion 23-Mulual Aid 3 Possible CVA.Silver Lake 3 Vehicle Accident-Mutual Aid 3 Move Up To Slafion 23-Muhml Aid 3 Leg Lacernlion 2 Chest Rrdn-Capri Blvd. 5 Trnuble Breathing. San Salvador St 4 Move Up To Stalion 23-MuhJal Aid 2 Brush Fire-Seawall Cl. 2 Trouble Breathing-VVesl Page Page 3 Fire Alarrn-L.a Peninsula 3 V~:hicle Accidenl-951 &Fiddlers Creek 4 Move Up To Slalion 23-MLJlual Aid 8 BombThreal 8 Mutual Aid Assisting East Naples-Slruclure Fire 3 Veh:cle Acciderfl Nodh Of Jolly Bridge 3 Mulual Aid As~isling Sial/on 50 2 Vehicle Accidenl 2 Vehicle Accidenl-M,~rco Bridge 3 86 y/o fell 4 Vehich? Accidenl 2 Move Up 'fo Stahon 23-Mulual Aid 3 Vehicle Accidenl-951&41 3 218, Konfiki-Boal Fell On a Person 3 VVoman Confused-30 Dolphin Cir 4 Fire Alarm-101 Mainsail Dr 3 Vehicle Accident-1 mile So of Mainsail 3 Vehicle accidenl-951&Mainsail 2 16G 1 16G 1 RECEIVED OEC : 1997 COLLIER COUNTY L,.UNDFlrI.I, & MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY CITIZENS ADVISORY CONLMITI'EE MEET15NG AGENDA I.,ocafio,,' Date & T~e: · Collie' County Board of County Commissioners Board Room Building F Collier County Govcmmcat Center 3301 E,m Tamiami Trail N~plea, Florida 34112 Thursday, December 1 I, 1997, 4:00 p.m_ 1. Introductions 2. Review & Approval of Minut~ from November 19, 1997, CAC Meeting 3. Other Bu~in~ 4. Work Sesaion ? Review of Technlc~ Memorandum No. 5 Addendum B. l~cr, entadon of Draft Final Report Development of CAC reco~-lqie~dafion to Coltier County Bom'ml of Coum'7 Commi.tdonen 5. Public Comment (To be held h-mmPi.rely following work Norris Hancock Coostant t ne~..,... ......... Mac 'Kle ~" 8err~ COLLIER COUNTY LANDFILL & ,MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE 1 NOVEMBER 19, 1997 MEETL-NG MENUTES Present: David Addison Brad Cornell Barbara Jenkins Fran Stallings Nancy Bisbee Michael Delate Russell Pfiddy Tim Constantine Tom Henning Ion Staiger Staff Liaison: David Russell Dufresne-Henry Team: Bill Bates, P.E., Klm Boyd, APRP, Dick ,Michael, P.E. J. W. Spear, P.E., David Wilkisoa, P.E., Absent: David Carpenter, Jim Stewart II. (a) (a) (b) (c) (d) Meeting was called to order at 4:00 p.m. by the CAC Committee Chairperson Tim Constantine. The chairman provided the audience with a review of the events and CAC efforts that have taken place to date and stated public comment will be held at the end of the meeting. Chairman Constantine introduced the CAC Committee and the Dufresne- Henry, Inc., Team and presented an outline on the topics for discussion during the meeting. 'the CAC approved the meeting notes from their meeting held on October 22, 1997. Russell Priddy motioned to hold the next CAC meeting on December I 1, 1997, in Immokalee due to the sites being located in District 5. Nancy Bisbee seconded motion. The motion failed. Tom Henning motioned to hold the next CAC meeting on December 11, 1997, at the Board of County Commissioners Board Room. Jon Staiger seconded the motion. The motion carded unanimously. Chairman Constantine mentioned that the draft of Technical Memorandum No. 5 will be reissued after the CAC's review, and once the typo's are corrected by the consulting team. He also informed the committee that the Board of County Commissioners wanted a list of pros and cons for each three sites rather than a ranking ofthe sites. 16G November 19, 1997 CAC Meeting Nfinutes Page 2 of 4 (e) Russell Priddy questioned how the committee would develop this rating process. (f) David Wilkison reiterated what Chairman Constantine stated and reminded the committee that the Board of County Commissioners requested choices. There will be no need to rank the sites simply listing the pros and cons for the Board of County Comm/ssioners decision. III. (a) Reviewed CAC history and purpose; Public Information efforts; Exclusionary Criteria; Candidate Area Definitions; Site Definition Rules; Evaluative Criteria; Evaluative Criteria Weighting Summary; Site Rating Results (preliminary); Creation of Areas A, L & U, which became sites, respectively. IV. (a) A slide presentation and a description of visual characteristics were given of each site to include geographic location and current use of land. (b) Site A: · Conceptual layout review: pointed out each component of the site plan; responded to retention of farm land issue, showed how phasing of landfill construction results in farmland retention; landfill consumes land at 6% per year over 50 year site; explained MSLr is symbol for recycling facility - technology has not yet been identified; landfill will be designed with a gas management system rather tharl retrofitted with one. (c) Response to .}'on Stalger's observation on page 4 regarding preservation of farmland and that Site L takes less farm land at 50 year build out. Jo Spear explained each number is proportionate to total acres of site and Site L is the smallest. (d) The committee chose not to review site concept for L & U due to similarity v.4th Site A. (e) Reviewed soil borings results of each site (graphs) and pointed out that Site U has the majority ofhydfic mils. Ground penetrating radar transects showed the subsurface conditions to be described by the borings. November 19, 1997 CAC Meeting Minutes Page 3 of 4 Referred to page Site Specification Evaluative Criteria. Reviewed site ownership: Each site has 2 property owners. · Clear relationship ofsite size to reduction of agriculture land or removal of' agricultural production land. · Wetland vegetation cover- review table for 33. · Rare and Endangered species - none found. · Hydric Soils - non on Sites A & L except corresponding with existing wetlands. Site U is majority hydric. · On-site residences - 2 found on each site. Jo Spear explained difl]culty of counting exact numbers of on-site residences during desktop evaluation and fly-over. · Federal T & E- none. · Drinking water wells- none. · Surface water quality. · Ground water quality. · Panther avoidance- non indicated. · Preliminary cost for I cell infrastructure - reviewed table 3.12. Cost difference is in infrastructure cost. Reviewed cost estimates in Exhibit A. 10 for Site A. · Russell Priddy commented that the estimate for land cost is based on the County Tax Assessor's oftice. Io Spear noted contractor mobilization and contingency numbers are conservative (high) due to limited investigation into design, yet at this time, numbers are based on committee criteria,, state law and site. · Reviewed road frontage for each site. · Examined infrastructure cost for Site U. · Reviewed minimum of agriculturally productive lanWacres that could remain throughout life of site. (g) Russell Priddy asked how we got from $350 million to $450 million..lo Spear cited excavation and fill to grade sites was a large cost factor not previously anticipated. The Dufi'esne-Henry, Inc., Team has not optimized site utilization, which is done during preliminary design. Cost estimate for siting is not a detailed construction cost estimate, but a guesstimate to be used to compare sites with one another (h) Nancy Bisbee moved to accept Technical Memorandum No. 5 with corrections. The motion was carried unanimously. 16G I November 19, 1997 CAC Meeting ,q'inutes Page 4 of 4 (i) Public comment session held at approximately 5:00 p.m. Comments made by Al Perkins. · $450 million has impact. · Animals in grove have impact. · Advocates total waste recovery. · College Properties is still a willing seller. (~omment~; made by Ty A~ston, · Dissatisfied with presentation this evening; does not promote public input. · Could not hear presentation. · Cost ofproject - concerned about 30% variance in projections · Just look to be informed. · College Properties report around non-existence in panther and cited import Texas panther and its proximity to Rookery Bay. · More worried about his drinking water than Rookery Bay. ° If landfill is safe enough for drinking water it should be more than safe enough to be built fight next to Rookery Bay. v. (a) (b) Chairman Constantine reminded the committee that their task was to develop a list ofpro's and con's on each site to evaluate the sites based on the evaluative criteria. Chairman Constantine will ask the Commission to authorize staffto solicit an RFP for waste hauling and disposal out of Collier County. Bids will be due in January 1998. ? Russell Priddy questioned why the cost would be the same to build landfill cells at the existing landfill site with existing infrastructure as to build at new site. VI. Following public comment the meeting was adjourned at approximately 6:00 p.m. NEXT ~MEETI~G: December 11, 1997, 4:00 - 6:00 p.m. Collier County Commission Board Room .:;L.mdfill ~ .5:ea~n. in~ 11-19-97,doa. CoYes To: Naples, Florida, November 24, 1997 LET IT BE KNOWN, that the LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD met on this date in regular session at 2:00 p.m. in the Main l,ibrary with the following members present: CttAIR: VICE-CttAIR: SECRETARY: Syd Mellinger Jaculyn Dering Sabina Musci Doris Lexvis Diane Williams ALSO PRESENT: John W. Jones, Library Director Frank Cullen, President, Friends of the Library Marilyn Matthes, Assistant Library Director Luz Pietri, Sr. Secretary APPRO\"AL OF MINUTES Mrs. Mellinger asked for comments or corrections to the minutes of October 22, 1997. There being none, Ms. Musci moved, seconded by Mrs. Lewis and carried unanimously, that the minutes be approved as submitted. REPORTS OF OFFICERS Mrs. Mellinger stated that she had, on behalf of the LAB, sent flowers to thc newly created Marco Island City Council. She also reported that she had received a letter from the Marco Island Woman's Club stating that they will not be paying interest on the money they had borrowed from the Friends to build the gazebo. They will be paying $5,000 per year. t6G 1 COMMUNICATIONS - None UNFINISItED BUSINESS In reference to the Marco Island Branch construction, Mrs. Mellinger asked il*the Library staffhas made any preparations fbr a dedication. Mr. Jones responded that Mrs. Norris is most likely working on it, but that he would check with her, anyway. Mr. Jones report on the progress of'the construction is included in the Director's Report. North Regional Library (See Director's Report) The Board reviewed the nominations submitted for the selection of the Library's Employee of the Month. Mrs. Lewis moved, seconded by Mrs. Dering and carried unanimously, to select Penny Costin as Employee of the Month for November 1997. Mrs. Matthes reported that the lnternet connection had been down for a while and did not have much else to report on it. NEW BUSINESS - None GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS - None DIRECTOR'S REPORT Mr. Jones did not have any new developments to report besides those stated on his most recent report. REPORT OF THE FRIENDS Mr. Cullcn reported that thc Friends are actively looking for anybody who has any influence at Marco to help them put together a promotion for FOL membership to coincide with thc re-opening of thc Marco Island Library. Fie also stated that the Friends arc adding between 65 to 7.5 new memberships per month. Lastly, he reported that thc Friends Anniversary Dinner was a success. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Library Advisory Board, Mrs. Dering moved, seconded by Mrs. Lewis and carried unanimously, that the meeting be adjourned. Time: 2:50 p.m. 16G i DIRECTOR'S REPORT November 24, 1997 Circulation' Our circulation continues to grow at thc 18 to 19% level for each fiscal )'car, Year ('irculation 1993 1,061.000 1994 1995 1.332.fl00 1996 1.554,000 1997 1,875,000 This continued growth is reflected in our comparative October statistics. Ycar Circulation Oct. 94 93,000 Oct. 95 99,700 (Jct. 96 112,000 Oct. 97 133,000 Based upon this data our circulation will exceed 2 million next year. This figure would place our circulation in the top 12 oFthe State with only the 20"' ranked population base. Marco Island Thc project continues to move along at a slower rate than hoped for. At present, thc project is nmning between 2 and 3 weeks behind. The upside is that by all appearances, it is going to be a very eye appealing facility. The Gazebo is up and the park is taking shape. The Front entrance and patio area are clearly defined. :.66 1' Northern Regional At present we are looking at two 5-7 acre tracts of land in thc prime area. One tract is on Immokalcc Road, the other I/4 mile off thc intersection. New Personnel We have received several new positions in the current budget. Collier North, Estates, Golden Gate and the Headquarters received new positions. The budget also provided for a new delivery van. One ofthe new positions was another full time driver. Wc will now be able to make daily deliveries to all the branches. Immokalec Tanya Crump has beep appointed head of this unit. She is presently enrolled in library school but will continue to work Full lime. ! i I I ! ! ! i I 16G ~EiP, ED PARK~ & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD , ~~-. WI~DNI6SD~kY, December 1'~, 1997 Gol~o~ Gate Gommanttg Park 2:00 P.M. ,'~00 Santa Barbara Blvfi., Naples, l:lorl~a Herr ~ $ H~ncock ~ ~ .... Constant ine ~ac '~( le W4sc. Cortes: Copies To: 1 P.\RK.% AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARI) ,.[(;END..[ Ilecember 17, 1997 (;olden (;;itc Communilv Park 331)(! Santa il:~rbara Boulevard, Naples, Florida '1'1~¢ Parks and Recreatim~ ,\dvisl~ry Board meeting ~'ill be held ~'etl~esday. November 19. 1997, 2:{)~) i~.m. al (;olden (;~te ('{m~munilv Park, 331111 Santa Iiarl)ara Iloule~'ard. Naples. Florida. I. (',~l,I, TO OR[)~[I/: II. l'l,l.~l)(;}: O}' AI,I,E(;IAN('}: TO TIlE FI,AG: Ill. INVO('ATION: IV. APi)ROVAI, OF MINt TES, November 19. 1997Mcelln~ A I-7 %'. A%%ARD PRESENTATION: I. Attilude A~ard- Dawn I)od~e I...[~ricu}lt~rc (;;Ir'¢l~r~ I)resentnlion- Denise Illantml X'll. RI.:QI'I':S'I'S FOR I)IS('I:SSION - Sl'[X'lFl(' I'I)i)AT~: ITl':M VI I I. I{E P O R'I'S/['1) i)A T ES: I. 51onlhlv Reporl(November) {MIII}e{listritmledal meeting} 2. P..~R..XB Position Slalus 3. BCC- Recaps fl~r Novemi)er-I)ecember II 8 4. Parks & Recreation I:.Y.I. B 9 5. Adopl-..[-Park Report 6. I'ar'al~ 51eelin~ Schedule CI IX. AD.IOI'RNMFNT 1 I ! I I I I I I! I I I I I ! I I I I Ii A 16G 1~ I I I I I i I I I ! I I ! I I PRESENT: ABSENT: PARKS AND RECI~.EATION AI)VISORY BOAI*,I) November 19, 1997 Minutes (;olden (;ate Community Park 3300 Santa Barbara Boulevard, Naples, Florida Timothy Blackflml, Ch:lirman .Ioseph Zaks Billie Cheney Daphnie Bercher El'aine Wicks, Vice Chair (;ayle L. Start Gil Mueller ALSO PRESENT: Maria Ramscy, Director Murdo Smith, Recreation Manager (;tin' Franco, Parks Superintendent .lacquic Hart, Secretary II John Dunnuck, Operations Coordinator Ginger tlinchcliff John (;rice Kent Kolegue I. CALL TO ORI)ER: Thc meeting was called to order at 2:Ig p.m. II. PLED(;Ir~ OF ALI,EGIANCE TO TilE FLAG Ill.INVOCATION: by .lacquie l lart Iv. APPROVAL ()F MINUTES: October 22. 1997 meeting. Nlr. Mucllcr stated that on page 1 and 2 thc minutes wcrc complete but on page 3 thc minutes ,,','crc brief. Mr. Mucllcr stated that some of thc board members said much more on thc subjects than transcribed on page 3. Mr. Muellcr stated that he was not sure whether the procedures for typing the minutes were to touch on highlights or how specific should the minutes be. Mr. Mucllcr inquired what are the procedures [or typing tlre minutes? C}:airman Blacklbrd slated that tire minutes at one time were verbatim and lire board got away from that and requested ti'mt the minutes be condensed. Mr. Mucllcr stated thc minutes arc too bricfi Mr. Muellcr stated that Ms. \Vicks rind Mr. Zaks comments were more than three (3) lines. In Mr. I I ! I I I [ I I I ! I I [ I ! I I 16G Mucllcr's case Tigenai[ Tragedy discussion there is only two t2) lines and Mr. Mucllcr stated that he recall talking for about 4 to 5 minutes (m the subject. Mr. Zaks stated that he thought the minutes were short, concise and made important points. Mr. Zaks suggested that if the board feels strongly that a particular subject should be included in more details than this to please state so on that particular subject for the future. Mr. Mucllcr stated that the Board of County Commissioners and others read the minutes and it would be good if they are a,0.are of what is being discussed. Motion by .Joe Zaks that the October 22, 1997, minutes be approved as prepared and amended by including a verbatim discussion on Tigertail Tra~,edy. Seconded by Tim Blackford. Passed 7/0. Tit~ertaii Tragedy - Mr. Mueller stated that a tragedy occurred at Tigertail Beach. Ms. Ramscy indicated that additi(mal signagc will be inslallcd by Iht County. Mr. Mueller stated that people5 should take responsibilities for their oxvn actions. Thc county can not install signs in all different languages for people that utili×cd the facilities. v. AWARI) PRESENTATION: Chairman BlackFord presented Janice Elliott and Bret Popma with an Attitude Award and congratulalcd lhem. VI. INTROI)U('TION: VII. NEW ilUSINESS/PI/ESENTATIONS a. Interview for Parab Position - Interview #1 ,John Grice - Mr. John Gricc stated that lie would like to get involved in community activities and to get to know people. Mr. Gricc is a Realtor and would like to get familiar with thc community. Mr. Grice has lived in Collier Cmmty since 1994. Mr. Mucllcr stated that one of the major concerns of Ihe Park and Recreation Board is attendance. There has been a case where individuals attended one meeting and never attended again. Mr. Mueller stated that its ,.'er5.' important because PARAB needs a quorum to have a altering. Mr. Xlueller stated that personally lie would w:mt a commitment from Mr. (}rice as far as attending the meetings. I I I I I I i ! I I ! I I I I I Sir. (.;rice stated that it' Sir. Mueller looks at his resume he will noticed that he is tile Chairman of the Amclus Committee and having Chaired the conlmittee lie understood exactly what is been said. Interview //2 Ginger Hineheliff- Ms. Ilineheliff stated that currently she works for I11¢ Department of I!nvironmental Prt)tection at Rookery Bay and has been l]le I)irector oF Education since 1990. Nfs. I linchcliff has lived in the County since the early 80's. Ms. I lincbcliff is eager lo parlicipalc in more communilv activities and is particularly interested in the Parks and Recreation i)cpartment because flint's xvbat she has a degree in t?om Penn State IJnivcrsity. Ms. I linchcliff has done a lot of work in national parks and would like to $gct involved with community parks. Ms. I linchclilt' has been using the Community Park system fi~r several .,.'cars and feels that its a quality life issue in Collier County. Ms. IlinchclifFs manages approximately 110.000 acres of aquatic reserves and resources. Ms. l linchclifF utilizes tile aquatic facility at Golden Gate which she finds ,,'cry attractive and also t, scs the boat ramps at Cocohatchec River Park. Sir. Zaks inquired what Ms. I linchcliff found least attractive. Sis. l linchcliff stated that thc county does a good job and at this time she did not lind anything least attractive. Ms. l linchcliff indicated that she is a timely person and has checked with her superior to make st,re she is able to attend the meetings every month. Interview //3 - Kent Kolegue - Mr. Kolcgue stated ti'mt he applied for tile P..\RAB due to previous involvement with tile (;olden (Jato Community Center Advisory Board. Sir. Kolegue's reason Ibr wanting to be on the board is to continue to see that all the Parks and Recreation get properly funded and to continue with improvements. Mr. Kolegue is married with three (3) children and his children t, tilize thc parks programs. Interview #4 - Gayle Stan - Mr. Sh,eller asked Sis. Start what is her feelings with regards to attendance. NIs. Stan responded that she had been on tile board Ibr 19 months and only missed one meeting. Ii I I I I I I I I I I I I I [ I I I I [ Mr. Zaks inquired what did Ms. Stan view as an accomplishment during her vemle on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Ms. Slan slated Ihe ('opeland i~laygrcmnd. Mx. Start saw Ihe need and followed through with the request for a playground. This was Ihe first prqject Mx. Start aetHallv xaw J'r()nl beginning to end. All the other projects xuch ax Sugden Regional Park are still heing worked on. Ms. Stan biggest dixappointment was Ibc lack of money and Ihe restriction on all Neighborhood Parks. Ms. Stan staled that as the County grows bigger and the roads expand there will be more need Ibr Ncighh{~rh(~od Parks. Interview #$ Timothy Blaekford - Mr. Muellcr inquired why Mr. Blackford thinks he is qualified for the PAI,',AB position. Mr. Blackford stated that xvhen lie first applied with the board lie may have had difficulty in ansxvering the question. Ils has been live (5) years now since Mr. Blacklbrd has been on thc board and ils thc on thc job experience that makes him qualified. Mr. Mucller stated that Mr. Blacklbrd had a good record of attendance also. Mr. Blackford stated that the Sugdcn Regional Park would be the biggcxt accomplishment and a state of thc art park facility. Mr. Blacklbrd biggest disappointment is the Beach Parking permit as PARAI~ voted unanimously in lhvor of instituting beach parking and then it was taken away by the Commission. The depamnent went through a couple of years not charging and then it came back to were a charge was reinstiluted. Mr. Blackford stated that recently thc Board Of C'OUfllV Commission has put a lot more emphasis on the Parks and Recreation Advisory 13~mrd recommendation. .,\ sheet of paper was distributed to all PARAB members. Each member ranked the interviewers from I-5. l.isting the top person fronl 1 and thc lowest rank as 5. Mr. Blackford was ranked ill, Ms. Ginger I linchcliff xvas ranked //2, Mr. Kent Kolegue was ranked//3, Mr. John (]rice was ranked//4, and Gayle Stan was ranked #5. 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! ! I I Motion by l%rlr. Zaks that Parks and Recreation Advisor' Board recommend Timothy Blackford :lnd (';ingcr llinchcliff fi~r the PARAB position. VI. REQUEST FOR I)ISCUSSI()N/SPECIFIC Ill'DATE ITEM Tree Dedication Video Presentation - Ms. l lasse stated that the video being presented was a Tree l)cdication a! thc Max I lasse Jr.. Community Park. Thc video showed the ceremony and the different organization Max l lasso .ir. represented. Each member of each organization shoveled mulch around the tree. b. Tree Planting - Mr. Zaks suggested that tile Parks and Recreation Department phmt trees around thc playground area for shading. Mr. Zaks stated that tile department should contact some of tile banks who would be willing to donate some money towards trees or landscaping of thc park. Ms. Ramsev stated that (Jar3, Franco has approximately $200.000 in his budget for landscaping and also tile l.cisure l.ine has a tree planting program. An individual could buy a tree lind thc Parks Maintenance section would plant lhe tree at the suggested park and a plaque would bc placed tit the tree. Mr. Mucller also stated that he had donated a tree at tile Tigertail Beach Park. Ms. Stan suggested that thc dcparlmcnt advertise on thc government cllannel regarding tree donations because some people do not read the l.cisurc [.inc. Mr. Smith stated that staff was working on a pamphlet outlining tree donations. Public Forum - A public forum will be held al the St. John's Church. November 25. 1997 next Tuesday at 7:00 p.m. Ms. Ramscy will be presenting the Bluebill Property [leach Parking Plan and Commissioner l tancock will also be in attendance. Ms. Ramscv will be discussing tile trolley, pnrking spaces, walking way. picnic pa;,'ilion and playground nrea. There will be a parking meter installed and a trolley will transport individuals to the State Park. I I I I I I I [ ! I I I I I I I ! I I 16G Summary Sheet - Chairman Blackl'ord requested a summary sheet on all park related items discussed at thc Board ol'('ountv ('mnmission meeting. Mr. J,hn I)unnuck will prepare ii recap l'or thc next meeting. Sunshine Ace Corp.- Fitness Center Membership- Ms. Start stated that thc Manager of Sunshine Acc who recently got a membership fi~r thc Fitness Center stated that thc Fitness Center is wondcrl'ul and they currently have 12 cmphtvccs carolled. VII. REI'()I~,TS & UI'I)ATES Monthly Report (Octoberl- A discussion to.k place regarding thc Oct{~hcr nmnthly report. Mr. Mucllcr inquired what did VYCP and VTCP mean. Mr. Smith stated that (VYCP)meant Vineyards £,ommunity Park and thc other is Vcterans Community Park Mr. Mucllcr inquired why is it that East Naples is showing that thc Facility riser are over 58.00(I and thc revenue is truly twenty Ihrce hundred (S2.300) dollars. It was explained that thc users would use thc hasket ball court, soccer field, pl,qyground area. and not usc the paid programs such as aliershool. or other classes. Beach Fee - Mr. Mucllcr stated tha! two meetings ago a discussion took place regarding charging a minimal fcc o1' $5.f)0 ltl process a beach parking permit. Mr. Mueller suggested that it would be a good idea to raise thc beach parking fcc inslcad ot'charging a $5.00 beach sticker 112¢. Co Sugden Retdonal Park Status - The reslroom and offices arc being installed. The due date for completion is June 6. 1998. ti. South Park- Thc top 3 proposals were chosen. The companies arc \\:ilson Miller. Post Bucklcy. and [lolc Montes & Associates. A selection committee will select thc top firm from these 3. Ms. Ramsey stated in 8 nmnths there will be a design liar construction e. North Naples Regional Park - Ms. Ramscy stated that the Real Property Department has submitted a pmcntial list o1' properties Ibr a I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I ! regional park location. A ct)mmittee will be formed to review these locations. fo Adopt-A-Park Report - Ms. Stan visited Cocohatchce River I'ark there has not been much activity at the park. Ms. Ntan also visited I.ely Barefoot and the guard house is still there. Mr. Zaks thanked the Parks and Recreation l)epartment for assisting with Christmas in Immokalee. Snowfest - Snowfest xvill be held at the Golden (iate Community Park on December 6. 1997. Mr. Smith stated that this is tile time of tile year that thc Parks and Recreation Dep~,rlmcnt will bring 40 tons of snow in for thc kids. VIP passes and T-shirts will bc mailed to I'ARAB members. h. PARAB Meeting Schedule -The next meeting will be held at thc (;olden Gate Community Park..~.~; ~ Santa Barbara Boulevard. Naples. I:lorida. December 17. 1997 at 2:00 p.m.. VIII. AI),IOURNMENT Meetinff., adjourned at 4:30 P.M.. Motion by ,Joseph Zaks to adjourn, Seconded by l)aphnie Bercher. Passed 7/0. I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I B 16G I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I ! i I I 16G I:IOARI) OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PARKS AND RECREATION RECAPS: No~. / Dec. DATE ITEM #.." : '. " SUBJECT I 1/18/97 5Al l'roclamation recognizing Christina l.ong tbr her tree donation to East Naples Community Park I1/I 8/97 5A2 Proclamation recognizing Pelican Bay Park as an outstanding Tennis Facility by thc United States Tennis Association 1 I/18,'97 16C4 Amendment or'Chapter 89-449 allowing bonfires and other events at the discretion ot'the P & R director. To be presented to Il,cai Legislation 1/I 1/97. 12:2'97 16C2 Budget amendment from rescrxcs Ibr 534.290 to purchase 15 portable radios for park rangers. 12/9.'97 5C2 Presentation to Ed Torroni. Assistant to the Athletic Supervisor. as ('oilier County "Employee of the Year" B 1 16G !.997 ,.,~. '. , · TI IL IMMOKALEE SPORTS COMPLEX HOSTED " ~. · TI IF. l llGtt SCt lOOI, CI,ASS 5A DISTRICT SWIM , ~g~' MEET ON NOVEMBER 14th. 'I'1 !AS 13l'iS'l'l ll(ill SCII()OI, I)IVI{RS i"l,ll'l'l{I) AND TWISTED OVER ti: THE GOIJDEN GATE AQUATIC FACI[.ITY DURING TIlE }tIG}! SCHOOl. CI.ASS 5A DISTI>,ICT DIVING C}IAMPIONSHIPS ON NOVEMBER ]31h. 500 TEENS DANCEI) UP A STORM AT TIlE GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTF. R ON NOVEMBER 14fi~. TENNIS WAS HOPPING AT THE PELICAN BAY COMMUNITY PARK AS THE TURKEY CLASSIC TENNIS TOURNAMENT WAS HELD ON TIlE ,.~5~ WEEKEND OF N()VEMBER 21st. 200 PEOP[.E ' "' PARTICIPATED IN THE EVENT. GOLDEN GATE COMMI]NIT~ PARK IlELD A MIDDLE SCIIOOL FIELD DAY ON NOVEMBER 26th. ~O KIDS ATTENDED TtIE EVENT. GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER RECI~IVED.TItE QUARTERLY BEAUTIFICATION AWARD FROM THE GOLDEN GATE CIVIC ASSOCIATION FOR OUTSTANDING PROPERTY MAINTENANCE. THE VETERANS PARK ROLLER RINK OPENED TO THE SOUND OF HOCKEY KIDS SLAMMIN TIlE BOARDS. I B (9) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I 166 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I ] 16G A l)f) PT- A- I)A R K r !< Pr) RT Thc ,\(h)l]l-.\-I):lrk I{cpor! is pr(]vi(le(l I)v the Parks and Recreation A(hiso]T Board. F::~ch I)..XlL, kB member visits their adopted parks and ~ives ;I detailed rt'lmrl of thc parks condition. 'l'he purpose of Ihis rel)Orl is Io hel!) Parks and I{ecreation l)el):lrlmenl lo continually irnl)ro~e in rn;lirll:~inin~ i)ark fac]lille's, Tim lllackford: ;I. \'elf'r;tf]~ ('OIHIllIIIliIN, P:lr~, I{eporl on I/21/08 Billie ('hencv: a. Inlmokalee ('ommnnils' Park h. Immokalee Recrealion'.\qualic Repot! on 2/25/98 (;il .%1 ueller: ( ;;1% h.' ~,I;I I1: 3. I I Iq q' h, Joseph 7. aks: Frank .Mackle ('omm,nil~ Park h. 'l'i~¢rl~il Beach c. ('oilier ('ount~ Racquel ('enler (':)('::halchee Ri~(,r Park l.eh ilart, l'))ol Beach :l. Vine}:lrds (:ommunil,, Park h. i}a.~vit.:s ('i()mm,nil.s Park a. .~u~del] Re~iol)al Park h. Enst N:iples ('Olrl1111tlllil~l Park Repot! on 4122/9~ ( 'olliplete(I o)] I{el)orl on 5/2.~/'0'7, Rep,r] )m I.~/I ?/9'7 Rep(itl on ?/22/98 (' IO I I I ! I I I I ! I I I I I I ! I ! 16G PARi(S AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD MEETING SCHEDULE l)ecember I% 1997 meetin~ scheduled ;it (;()l(len (;',lie ('(~mmunitv Park, 33011 Snnta Ilarlmra l:Ioule,,'nr(I, Naples, Florida, al 2:00 p.m. ,'~ll';llll'l' ( IIRi.",il.XI..\S.. There ~sill he a ('hrislnms NOTI.;: .~leelin~ dates could lie chan~ed due to Imlidavs ~Jl)ser,,'ed. I'..\i,1,~,11 memberx ~ill I)e notified 2 ~','eek~ l)ri,r to meetinl~ date in the event clmn~e. ** .~ll.:.-\N.',i ,.\ I).VI'I.: ()R ,\ I,O('..\Ti()N II,.\N llEI-:N ('II..\N(;I.:I). ('(11) AGENDA IEF ! 1997 COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY, DECEMBER 18, 1997 IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE:ANY PERSON WHO DECIDED TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF TIlE PROCEEDINGS 1S MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICIt THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. o ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. THESE MATERIALS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. ROLL CALL BY CLERK ADDENDA TO THEAGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINIJ'TES: November 6, 1997 and November 13, 1997 IV, isc. Corres: 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES: ' 5. BCC REPORT 6. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT Itom~ ~ ~ ' '-~ · 7. ADVERTISED PUBLIC ItEARJNGS: Cop;es To: Co Norris Hancock Constanttne~.~. Mac'Kie Bert) Petihon No. BD-97-26, Miles L. Scofield. representing Donald W. Polcn requesting approval to conslzuCt a boathouse over ;~ proposed 16 foot boat dock and boat lift for property located at 260 Charmci Drive. further described as Lot 27, Block C, Conncr's Vandcrbilt Beach Estates Unit No. I. (Coordinator: Fred Rcischl) Petitioa No. PUD-97-10. William L. Hoover, AICP, of Hoover Planning Shoppc representing Richard J. Clescn of F. Clesen & Sons, Inc., requesting a rezone from "A" and "A/ST" to "PUD" Planned Unit Dcvdopment to be known as Bay West Villas for 200 dwelling units, located on thc north side of Immokalec Road (C.R. 846), 7/8 mile west of C.R. 951, in Section 22. Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier CounEq Florida. consisting of 28.68 acres, more or less. (Coordinator: Ray Bellows) Petition No. CU-97-24, William L. Hoover, AICP, of Hoover Planning Shoppe and Beau Kcene. PIE.. representing Richard and Teresa Yahl, requesting Conditional Usc "2" of the "A" zoning district for m~Ic/b(ng and horticultural recycling for property located on thc south side of Washburn Avenue S.W., a.n?h'"i'""'-"!7 ~,/, mile north of Alligator Alley (S.R. 84). in Section 31, Township 49 south, Range 27 EasL (~,o)lier County,_ Florida consisting of 5.19 acres, more or less. (Coordinator: Susan Murray) H. i6G '1 Petition No. S -97-2. Vvflcy M. Parker of ParkcriMudgctuSm~th Architects. reprcsentin~ Lely Develonrhent Corporation on behalf of Ed'son Community College, request,rig a varmnce from I~he rc'quireme~¢~ of Section 2.5.5.2.3.12 of the 1.DC for a 20 foot high double-faced off-premises directional sign with a ,~opy area of 72 square feet located at the intersecnon of Isle of Capri Road IC.R. 951 ) and Lely Cultural Parkway right-of-way, in Section 22. Township 50 South. Range 26 East. ICoordinator: Chahram Badamtchian) Petition No. R-97-8, Community Development & Environmental Services Division. representing the Cdtliet County Board of County Comm,ssmners. requesting a rezone from "PUD" Planned Unit Developmetit to 'A" .'",gricultural for thc Vmccnuan Residence PUD located on the south side of U.S. 41 East and on thei'east side of Southwest Boulevard. in Section 32. Township 50 South, Range 26 East. Collier County. Flo~ida. consisting of 30.7 acres, fCoordmator: ('hahram Badamtchian~ Petition No. PSP-97-16. WCI Communities. L.P.. requesting Preliminary Subdwts~on Plat approval for Pelican Marsh East. located on the west s~de of Airport-Pulling Road {C.R~ 31) between Vanderbilt Beach Road ((7.R. 862) and Immokalee Road {C.R. 846), tn Section 25 and 36. Township 48 South. Range 25 ]East, consisting of 768 1 acres. {Coordinator: Ron Nino) Petmon No. PUD-97-15. Blair tX. Foley, P.E., of Coastal Engineering Consultants. Inc.. representing George Vukobratov~ch. Trustee, requesting a rezone from "CF" Community Facility to "PUD" Planned !Unit Development for a mlxed commercml land use development strategy in a project titled Willow Park' for property located on the east s~de of Airport-Pulling Road south of Lone Oak Boulevard and immedifi)ely contiguous property known as Princess Park in Sectton I. Township 49 South. Range 25 East, COllier Count],.,. Florida. containing 11,3_5 acres, more or less. (Coordinator: Ron Nino) (Continued from the meeting of December 4. 1997) Petition No. DOA.97-3. George L. Vamadoc of Young, vanAssendcrp & Vamadoe, P.A., reprcscntingDY Associates Joint Venture. a Florida General Parmership, for an amendment to the Marco Shores/Fiddler's Creek Development Order 8-1-3. as amended for the purpose of adding 1.38.5 acres to the Fiddler's Creek portion of said development order, and companion Planned L'nit Development zoning regulation, and to adopt a new Master Plan for sa~d added area while leaving constant the currently authorized number of dwelling units, namely 6,000 for the Fiddler's Creek portion of Marco Shores, said additional land area is located in Section 18, 19 and 29, Township $ I South. Range 27 East. Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Ron Nino)(Compamon Item PUD-g4-7(6) (Continued to January 15. 1998) Petition No. PUD-~4-7(6}, George L. Vamadoe of Young, vanAssenderp & Varnadoe. P.A., representing DY Associates Joint Venture. a Florida General Partnership. for a rezone from "PUD" Planned Unit Development and 'A" Rural Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development. having the effect of amending the Fiddler's ('reek portion of the Marco Shores PUD and adding 1,385 acres thereto while holding constant the currently authorized number of dwelling units, namely 6.000 for the fiddler's Creek portion of the Marco Shores PUD lying in Sections 13, 14, 15.22.23 and 24. Township 51 South, Range 26 Ea~;t and Sections 18. 19 and 29. Township 51 South, Range 27 East, Collier County. Florida. consisting of 3,763.99 acres, mine or less. (Coordin~ator: Ron Nino} (Companion Item DNA-97-3) (Continued to January 15. 1998) 9. 10. 11. OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA ADJOURN 12/I 8~97 CCPC AGENDAJ'md 16G .~ovember 6, 1997 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COM/4ISSION Naples, Florida, November 6, 1997 LET IT BE R~,~ERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 8:30 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHA I R/4AN: Michael A. Davis Russell A. Budd Michael J. Bruet Russell A. Priddy Donald J. York Edward J. Oates, Jr. Michael Pedone Richard Nelson Gary Wrage ALSO PRESENT: Bob Fernandez, County Administrator Marjorie M. Student, Assistant County Attorney Robert J. Mulhere, Current Planning Manager Page 1 AGENDA 16G I COLLIER COUNTY PLAuNNTNG COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THI.IRSDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 1997 IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEE'I'I'NG ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE:ANY PERSON WHO DECIDED TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS ,MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. I. ROLL ALL MATERSAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. TH-ESE MATERSALS WIY, L BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. CALL BY CLERK ADDEN'DA TO THE AGENDA o APPROVAL OF MI2',FUTES: September 18, 1997 and October 2, 1997 PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES: 5. BCC REPORT 6. CHA. IRMAN'S REPORT ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: Petition No. PSP-97-14. Ma~k Morton of $ohnson Engineering, Inc., representing Ocean BoUlevard Partnership II, requesting Preliminary Subdivision Plat approval for Creekside Cormneree Park West - Unit I, located on the south side of Immokalee Road (C.R. 846) at Goodlerte-Frank Road (C.R. 851), in Section 27, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. (Coordinator: Bryan Milk) (Continued from October 16, 1997) Petition No. BD-97.21, Miles L. Scofield, representing William Crean, requesting a 13 foot boat dock extension to allow for a 33 foot boat dock and boat lift facility for property located at 132 Wilderness Cay, further described as Lot 22. Port-of-the. Islands (The Cays) Phase II, Tract D. (Coordinntor: Susan Murray) Petition No. BD-97-22, Miles L. Scofield, representing George F. Riley requesting a 10 foot boat dock extension to allow for a 30 foot boat dock and lift for property located at 74 $outhpor~ Cove, furth~ described as Lot 13, Southport on the Bay, Unit 1. (Coordinator: Ross Gochenaur) Eo Petinon No. V-97-1 I, Richard K. Bennett. reques~ng a 2 foot af~r-the.fact variance from ~e ~qu~d setback of 10 feet to 8 feet for a double fron~ge (~ou~) lot l~atcd at ~59 Rob~ Avenue. described ~ Lot 11, Block C. Fl~go Es~tes. in Sec~on 1, To~Mp 50 Sou~ P~ge 25 E~L Collier Co~, Hon~. (Cootd~tor: Fred Reisc~) Pennon No. V-97-12, Alfred W. French of Alfred French & Associa~s, [nc.. r~rese~g Sea.est ~o~ Day School. reques~g a 6 foot v~ce from ~e ~0 foot ~ height allowed ~ ~e "E" Esmteslzo~g dis~c~ to 36 feet. for ptope~ located e~t of Co~ B~ Road o~ Davis Boulev~d (S.~ 84), m Sec~on 8. To~hip 50 Sou~. ~nge 26 E~t. (Coordi~tor: ~y Bellows~ F° Petition No. PLrD-90-32(l), R. Brace Anderson, Esqurre. of Young, vanAssenderp & Varnadoe~: P.A., representing Ashley Service Station, [nc., rec!uestmg a rezone from "PUD' to "RM.F-12 to "PUD' [~lamled Unit Development known as "Ashley's Service Station-Golden Gate" for the purpose of adding Lot 19. to the boundaries of the project; eliminating all ser,'ice station repair uses; eliminating the previously authorized third service repair bay and converting the two existing service hays into a small fast food restaurant; and the elimination of the potential for two dwelling units and associated density on Lot 19, for properly located in Section 27, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of I acre, more or less, (Coordinator: Ray Bellows) ~ Petition No. R-97-6, Dormnick $. Amico. Ir., P.E.. representing 322'/South Horseshoe Limited. requesting a rezone from "I" to "C-5" for property, located in Collier Park of Commerce (East Naples Industrial Park) near the northwest comer of South Horseshoe Drive and Airport-Pulling Road (C.R. 31} in Section 35. Township 49 South. Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. consisting of.5'/acre. (Coordinator: Ron Nino} Pennon No. PUD-82-6~'3), Granite Development. L.C.. requesting an amendment to the Sabal La~: PUD. Ordinance Number 82-~1. as amended, for the purpose of modifying Secnon 4.5 pertaining to setbackx and in pamcular separanon between principal and accessory su"ucmres, for property located on Radio Road (C.R. g56) appro×trnately 55 rmle east of Santa Barbara Boulevard. in Section 4, Township :50 South. Range 26 East. (Coordinator: RonNinoI Pennon No. PUD-96. tl (2), Karen Bishop of PMS. Inc.. of Naples, representing Pelican Strand. Ltd.. requesting a PU'D to PUD Planned Unit Development having the effect of amending the Pelican Strand PUD for the purpose of adding a communicanon tower as an authorized land use, and amending the Master Plan for proper'o/ located on the northwest comer of Interstate Highway 75 and lmmokalee Road (C.R. $46}, m Secnons 18 and 19. To',,,'nship ,18 South. Range 26 E;:kst, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 574.569 acres retire or Jess. (Coordinator: Ron Nino) Pennon No. CU-97-23. Geoffrey G. Pu~e. representing Fai~ Community Church. requesting Conditional Use "1" of the "E" Estates zoning district for a church, for property located at 22~ Avenue N.W. and Oake,~ Bm:levard. in Section 29, Township 48 South. Range 26 Eut. Collier County, Florida. consi.$ung of 4.99 acres. ICoordina:or: Ron Nino) Petition No. CP-97-4, Bruce Anderson & Robert Duane rc'!:n't~eutmg Manuel Pena. M.D. requesUng a small sc~!e amendment to in:lude 2.3 acres in Pine Ridge Road/I-75 l. nte~:hange Activity Center located: on the southeast comer of Napa Way and Pine Ridge Road. (Coordinator. Lee Lay~e) (Connnued to N ember 20. 1997) 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. ,'¢ti"~ BUSINESS 10. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 1 I. ADJOU'RN 1 I/6/97 CCPC AGENDA/md 16G 1,' November 6, 1997 CHAI~47~M DAVIS: I'll call this meeting of the Collier County Planning Commission to order and begin by calling the roll. Mr. Priddy. COMI4ISSIONER PRIDDY: Here. CHAIRNJkN DAVIS: ~r. Budd. CO~4ISSIONER BUDD: Here. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Mr. Nelson. COMMISSIONER NELSON: Here. CHAIP34A/~ DAVIS: Mr. Bruet. COmmISSIONER BRUET: Present. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Davis, here. ~4r. York. CO~4ISSIONER YORK: Here. CHAI~47d~ DAVIS: Mr. Oates. COI4MISSIONER OATES: Here. CHAIP~4AN DAVIS: Mr. Pedone? (No response.) CHAI~CAN DAVIS: 14r. Wrage. COI~4ISSiOI:ER P~RAGE: Here. CHAi~dA/W DAVIS: All righty. Any addenda to the agenda today? We've got two sets of minutes that we were provided. COI~ISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, I would move for approval of che September 18th and of the October 2nd, 1997 minutes. COMMISSIONER BUDD: Second. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: A motion by Mr. Oates, seconded by ~. Budd. CO~4ISSIONER PRIDDY: My vote will be for one set only since I didn't participate in one set. COMMISSIONER YORK: I'll second the other one then. CHAI~iAN DAVIS: ~o. The motion was by ~4r. Oates, seconded by ldr. Budd. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAI~4AN DAVIS: That carries unanimously. COMMISSiOi~ER OATES: It's my understanding that the bookends were Going to have something to say about the minutes but I guess they're not. COMMISSIONER WRAGE: Well, since you brought it up, even though we have approved these, I would like to point out on Page 4 that our elder statesman, ~r. Oates, referred to the bookends from Immokalee. We would rather k,e known as the anchors. CHAIRNAN DAVIS: An anchor is something you drag behind you. COMMISSIONER WRAGE: You get no respect. CHAIRN3IN DAVIS: Or holds you back, right? COMMISSIONER YORK: Let the record show that while tardy, Mr. redone has arrived. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Actually, I thought it was nine o'clock. CHAiP/4AN DAVIS: Any planned commission absences? I know we're aware that Mr. Oates is Going to be out traveling the world here and there. COMMISSIONER OATES: The next two meetings. CHAIR/W_AN DAVIS: The next two meetings. Okay. Page 2 16G 1 ,%~ovember 6, 1997 Anyone else? (No response.) .~ CHAI~4A_N DAVIS: Okay. Bob, anything in the way of a BCC report? I know that there was a discussion on density by the board that seemed -- seemed interesting. ~,. ~413LHERE: Right. I've -- I've brought copies of several memorandums here, one prepared by Mr. Cautero discussing the issue of density, and the others are white papers prepared respectively by Commissioners Constantine and Hancock. And the board did have some discussion with regard to this i~sue and -- and directed staff to prepare to evaluate opportunities to review the issue of density with the mind towards reducing the ultimate build out by a hundred thousand and coming back to the board within 30 days with some report on how we may achieve that reduction. And if I can accurately paraphrase Commissioner Hancock's discussion on the issue, the -- the board's approval brought into both Commissioner Hancock and Commissioner Constantine's white papers into the issue and is geared towards looking at the -- the transportation system and the limits on the transportation system. I~ And probably by reworking our modeling system, we will be able to determine what the maximum limitations of the transportation system are. I believe it was even discussed at the board that we've probably already exceeded those maximum limits on the existing transportatiom i' system, but at least we would know where we stood in that respect, and then beyond that, what might be done. The 2020 Feasibility Plan currently shows, i believe -- projects 21 flyovers within Collier County. And, obviously, that -- that was ~ discussed at the board and the feeling was that that was not a desirable outcome on a transportation system and not what the ~ community was interested in. So, potentially, ~:his being probably the mos~ restrictive aspect, being the transportation plan, we would look at that and find out what the maximum carrying capacity was and then -- and then see what we could do from that point on. So, I wanted to hand these out to you and -- and you could take a look at them and, obviously, anything that comes about through staff evaluation we'll keep you, you know, apprised of and -- and let you know. CHAI~4A_N DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Mulhere. ~ I think it's important for us to get up to speed on this and that a~ some point in time we may choose to have a discussion on our own about these issues and pass some ideas along to the Board of County Commissioners. Thank you. Under Chairman's Eeport, this past Tuesday, I became aware of a uhange proposed by the long range planning staff, that one element of which talked about taking this board out of the loop when the changes came back from DCI -- DCA before they went back to the board. I appeared here at the Board of County Commissioners' meeting and spoke briefly, the resul~ being that the board didn't think that taking us out of the loop was a wise thing to do and voted that aspect out unanimously. And I might say that their comments, particularly Commissioner Page 3 November 6, 1997 Constantine, were very complimentary to this board for the work we did on the recent round of growth management plan amendments; in particular, that in several situations where there was some disagreement between staff and this board, by and large, this board's recommendations were implemented by the Board of County Commissioners. I think it's important that you all know that. We -- we sit here, as volunteers, and it's -- it's great to hear that from the elected officials for whom we serve. With that -- COM/4ISSIONER BRUET: Excuse me, Mr. -- CHAI~4A/~ DAVIS: Yes. COMMISSIONER BRUET: -- I4r. Chairman, what ',:as the reason for such a -- CHAI~uN DAVIS: I think it was a -- in speaking with staff, it was a situation of a timing issue to expedite the process. And in talking with Barbara Cacchione, I commented that if in fact it came -- the changes came back from DCA with little or no comment and £ubs5antive changes that, you kmow, it might make a lot of sense just for it to go on to the board. But I think the reality of that is that's kind of a fantasy land, if you will. They always have a comment. COI4MISSIONER BRUET: Yeah. That would allow staff to determine what substitute -- subs~'tute changes are CHAI~4A_N DAVIS: Uh-huh. COMMISSIONER BRUET: So, it's probably just as good that we take CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah. CO:4MISSIONER BRUET: -- quick look at it. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: And that's -- I think the board felt very strongly about that. ~. Nelson. COMMISSIO}~ER NELSON: :4r. Chairman, I don't have my calendar in front of me, but do we have a night meeting next Tuesday or Thursday? CHAI~4AN DAVIS: The LDC meetings, ~4r. Mulhere? MR. N-JLHERE: I'm glad you brought that up. There's actually a : couple of issues. I was going to suggest that we discuss the LDC -- I have the handouts of the draft amendments and maybe under old business a brief discussion on those. CHAIRMA/~ DAVIS: Okay. i~ MR. MULHERE: But with respect to the dates, Thursday the 13th, :~ which is next Thursday evening, 5:05, and then the 25th, which is a Tuesday, but bo~h meetings are in this chamber. And, of course, i!i because Thursday is Thanksgiving, we kicked it back to the Tuesday. There is one other thing that we should discuss possibly under : new business, you made me think of it, and that I believe that the first -- I think the first meeting in January is a holiday. I have to get my calendar out, but I believe that January 1st is a Thursday. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah. We'll catch those -- COM/4ISSIONER OATES: It is, yeah. MR. PrULHERE: And, so, we need to maybe under new business discuss how you would like to handle that, whether or not you want to Page 4 ~ 16G 1 November 6, 1997 add another meeting, at what point and so on. CHAI~JLN DAVIS: Okay. And with the two LDC hearings -- COM/~ISSIONER YORK: Give me the dates of those LPG hearings, please. MR. ~ULHERE: The i3th of November and the 25th of November, both 5:05 and both here. CO~UfMISSIONER YORK: And the 25th is what day? MR. MULHERE: That's a Tuesday. COMMISSIONER YORK: The 13th is a Thursday, right? MR. MULHERE: Yes. COMMISSIONER YORK: Thank you. CF~IP/~A~ DAVIS: I guess it's to our advertised public hearings today; the first one, Petition PSP-97-14. COM/~ISSIONER OATES: Mr. Milk, I'm going to recuse myself from this one as my wife is a partner in their project. COmmISSIONER BUDD: Mr. Chairman, i also have a conflict and will step aside for this discussion and uote. CO~E<ISSIONER BRUET: Mr. Chairman, I also have a conflict. We have shared business interests with the petitioner. CF~i~.L:.=N DAVIS: Ail right. With that, I'll ask all those that are going to testify on this petition to please stand, raise your right hand so ~hat you may be sworn by the court reporter. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) _ CPU~I~N DAVIS: Thank you. Mr. Milk. I~R. MILK: Good morning, commissioners. For the record, m~' name is Bryan Milk. I'm presenting Petition PSP-97-14. This project is fcr uhe Creekside Commerce Park Preliminary Subdivision Plat, which is part of the Creekside Commerce Park POD for that region lying at the southwest intersection of Goodlette-Frank Road and ir~okalee Road. This particular project lies on the west side of the existing drainage easement which consists of this canal. The project area is 43.63 acres in size. It consists of five lots. These lots are oversized lots from what the minimum standards are within the Creekside PUD. Lots 1, 2, and 3 will be developed with a business-commercial relationship. Lots 4 and 5 will be of a light industrial character. And the future phase at the south will also be developed with light industrial uses. This particular subdivision plat has two access points onto Immokalee Road. The vehicular driveways are very similar to the right-of-way cross-sections that are used today in the Land Development Code for commercial and industrial driveways, that being that they provide for 12-foot aisle widths, sidewalks, three inches of asphalt surface, street lighting, landscape and 60-foot minimum right-of-way widths and all utilities inclusive. The project shows a master plan that is identical to the POD master plan which offers the interconnection to Goodlette-Frank Road. W~en the Board of County Co~mnissioners approved the subject petition, they did so with four Page 5 :.:ovember 6, 1997 provisions of extending this roadway all the way to the west which would eventually hook up to U.S. 41. There are certain provisions in the PUD document that would provide this right-of-way construction, one being that after three years of approval from two weeks ago, that would be the latest time that this would be constructed. The other is when the next site development plan comes in, it would have to be constructed. There's two other criteria that would enact that construction for that east-west corridor. If I can answer any questions at this time, i'd be happy to do so. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Questions of staff? COMMISSIONER YORK: Yes. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Mr. York. COMMISSIONER YORK: The controversial exit across from Collier's Reserve has been eliminated at this point? ~R. ~4ILK: Actually it -- it's right here -- CO~4ISSIO~ER YORK: Okay. ~4R. ~4ILK: -- commissioner. COM/~ISSIO~;ER YORK: It's still there though. MR. MILK: It's still there. ~at had happened is earlier on in the process this road used to be a loop, cul-de-sac road, that came through here. The Planning Commission recommended the second version, which is actually this version. This roadway will be used to service all the service trucks that will be utilizing the post office and Tyton Hellerman. COMMISSIONER YORK: Thanks, Brad. CHAIRFu%N DAVIS: Okay. Any other questions of staff? (No response.) CHAi~4AN DAVIS: Petitioner have anything to add? (No response.) CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Anyone from the public here today to speak on this petition? (No response.) CHAI~4AN DAVIS: And seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. Motion? COM/4ISSIO~ER YORK: Mr. Chairman, I move that we approve PSP-97-14. CO~M24ISSIONER PRIDDY: Second. CHAI~4A_N DAVIS: Motion of approval by Mr. York, seconded by Mr. Priddy. Discussion on that motion? (No response.) CHAIRMA2~ DAVIS: All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) C}~IRMA/.4 DAVIS: It carries unanimously. Petition BD-97-21. Ms. Murray. Once again, I'll ask all those present who are going to testify on this petition to please stand, raise your right hand so that you Page 6 November 6, 1997 may be sworn by the court reporter. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) MS. ~URRAY: Good morning. Susan Murray, current planning. The petitioner is requesting a 13-foot dock extension from the 20-foot permitted dock length for a total protrusion of 33 feet. The proposed dock structure extends 20 feet into the waterway and the boat lift is then attached on the southern part of that dock structure, an additional 13 feet, for a total of 33 feet of protrusion into a 400-foot wide canal. The subject property has 120 feet of water frontage. Neighbors on the east and west side have similar structures, one of which extends 20 feet, the other extends 40 feet. The reason for the request is to have access to navigable water for the petitioner's boat. I have received no letters in opposition and staff is recommending approval. CF~I~Z~N DAVIS: Questions of staff? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Petitioner have anything to add? M~. SCOFiELD: Not unless you have questions. CHAi~4A_N DAVIS: Do we have any questions of the petitioner? (No response.) CHAI~.U~; DAVIS: Anyone else here today that would like to speak~ on this petition? (No response.) CHAi~4A_N DAVIS: Seeing none, once again, i'll close the public hearing. Motion? CO~4ISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, I move we approve BD-97-21. CO~4ISSiONER PEDONE: Second. C~I~4AN DAVIS: Motion of approval by Mr. Oates, seconded by Mr. Pedone. Discussion? (No response.) CHAI~uN DAVIS: All ~hose in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAI~ DAVIS: Carries unanimously. A~d to the petitioner, the applicant should be aware that this boat dock petition may be appealed by an affected property owner w/thin 14 days of this hearing and, therefore, the applicant proceeds with construction at his or her own risk during this period. Petition BD-97-22. Mr. Gochenaur. Once again, all those present who are going to testify, stand and raise your right hand so you may be sworn by the court reporter. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) ~R. GOCHENAUR: Good morning, gentlemen. For the record, Ross Gochenaur, planning services. The petitioner is requesting a 10-foot extension to allow for a 30-foot boat docking facility accommodating one 26-foot pleasure craft. The property is located at 74 Southport Cove in Lely Barefoot Page 7 Nove..-foer 6, 1997 Beach and contains about 90 feet of water frontage. The waterway is just over 100 feet wide at the proposed site. The extension is needed to gain minimum depth needed to moor and lift the ov~er's vessel. Six boat dock extensions ranging from 29 to 46 feet, total protrusion, have been approved in the immediate vicinity of the subject property. We have received no objections to the project. The total protrusion into the waterway would exceed the 25 percent criterion by about 4.5 feet; however, 50 percent of the waterway would still be maintained. There is no dock opposite the subject property, and if the opposite property owner were to build to the maximum 20 feet, 50 percent of the waterway would still be maintained. The proposed facility meets all other criteria and staff does recommend approval. Any questions? CO~4ISSIONER BRUET: It actually would preclude then Lot 30 from ever coming for a variance; is that correct? !4R. GOCHENAUR: Yes, sir. He could build to 20 feet -- COI~4ISSIONER BRUET: Yeah. lz~. GOCHENAUR: -- but it would not be possible to build further, correct. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Do we know if he has navigable water at 20 feet? ~4R. GOCHENAUR: The petitioner might be able to give you a better idea, but the overhead that I looked at seems to indicate that there's more of a slope on the northern side where the petitioner's property is located than there is on the southern side. it appears to drop off more sharply there and it's possible that the owner of that property would not need ~he extension to get navigable depth. '~ CHAI~ DAVIS: Any other questions ofs~.~c~ Petitioner? I'm sorry. Hr. York? COHHISSIONER YORK: Well, I thought through it after -- after the motion. CHAI~N ;DAVIS: Fine. COI~ISSIONER YORK: Just a comment. CP~I~4AN DAVIS: All right. [4R. SCOFIELD: If you have any questions, I'll be glad to answer them. '~ COFR41SSiONER OATES: I think there was a question by Hr. Pedone -~ COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Yeah. CO~MISSIONER OATES: -- relative to the lot across the street. CO~4HISSIONER PEDONE: On Lot 30, the opposite lot, if -- do you ~! happen to know what the depth of the water is there at 20 feet? ~4R. SCOFIELD: Okay. Hiles Scofield, representing the petitioner. No, i do ncr know the water depths. I know that looking at the aerials. I didn't go over on that property and take any water depths. The lot across the canal though has two sides to it. The western side, it's a -- well, let me put it up and I'll show you. The -- this is the subject property right here. This is the Page 8 !6G 1 November 6, 1997 waterway coming through here. This piece of land is the lot you're referring to across the canal. He has this -- quite a bit of frontage on here. He can go either side of this dock. If the dock were to come out here, he could extend down. Now, it is shallower on the west side than it is on the canal side. There is -- there is a shoal coming out off of my client's property. It appears to be a little bit deeper on the other side but I did not take water depths, but he also has a lot of frontage over here which he can put a dock on also and extend out further. CHAI~43d, I DAVIS: On the other hand, Mr. Scofield, it appears that your client's lot, the way it lies, is in a bit more tight situation as far as where a dock can be located. M~. SCOFIELD: That's correct. We're not doing any dredging there. We're just putting a boat lift in front of his dock is what we're asking for. COI~4ISSiONER BRUET: it looks like Lot 30, Mr. Chairman, has some flexibility. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: :,~. Priddy. i~ CO~4ISSIONER PRIDDY: My question there would be while -- while he's got frontage on two sides and can go out, what conflict would he have with Lot 29 maybe? COM/4ISSiONER PEDONE: Twenty-two. CHAI~4J~N DAVIS: Twenty-two. CO~4ISSIONER PRIDDY: Twenty-two? Because that appears -- COMMISSIONER YORK: It couldn't be 22. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Thirty-two. ~.. GOCHENAUR: Sir, I think the 22 is a zoning note. I believe it's Lot 29. CO~4ISSiONER PRIDDY: Oh, okay. So, you think Lot 30 bends all the way around? CO[~4ISSiONER OATES: Does it go do,~ to the 22? Is that where it goes? [~q. :4ULHERE: Right. I think so. CO:~4ISSIONER PRIDDY: All right. That's eleven eight that conflicted out so -- CHAI~43uN EAVIS: Okay. Any other questions of the petitioner? CO~4ISSiONER WRAGE: I just -- just I'm curious. Is this kind o~ a me first and then if 14 and 15 have the same problem, that precludes those -- I mean, are there any other docks, I guess, on up the canal: 30, 31, 14, 157 CO~4iSSiONER YORK: What's the width of the waterway there, please? CO~4ISSiONER PEDONE: It's wider at 14. ~. SCOFiELD: It's 110 -- I believe it's !!0 feet or right at a hundred, a hundred -- one hundred feet. I'm sorry. CO~C'[!SSiCNER PEDONE: But at -- at Lot 14, the canal actually widens out a little bit, doesn't it, from the way I could see it anyway -- ~4R. SCOFiELD: Yes. COP~4ISSiONER PEDONE: -- yes. Page 9 16G I November 6, 1997 MR. SCOFIELD: Yeah, it does. You can see that from the aerial, yeah. ~ CO~4ISSIONER PEDONE: You know, twelve and i1 -- MR. SCOFIELD: It's a little bit, not much wider but -- but a little bit. There are -- COt{MISSiONER ~'IRAGE: i guess my question is, is this going to preclude anybody else from building docks? MR. SCOFIELD: It -- no, it won't preclude. CO~ISSiONER >~3.GE: You know, one on one side is out -- I mean -- l.~. SCOFIELD: No. CO~.:iSSiONER ?~."RAGE: -- see what i'm saying? :{R. SCOFiELD: On a lot of hundred foot canals -- on a lot of the hundred foot canals, we -- people do -- you know, there are docks out the 20 feet plus the -- plus, they have a boat from then out if they -- if they can't dredge and these -- these are one of the areas up in here, which is not a man-made. These are not man-made canals. State waters, state doesn't look favorably on dredging these, so in order for him to have a boat lift to have his boat on the front of his dock, that's why we're asking for the extension. And precluding the other people, it doesn't preclude them from doing it. They can come here and ask for an extension. CHAI~ DAVIS: Well, we can't lose sight of the fact, I think, that the staff has made a finding that -- that in this case the code criteria has been met and -- and their opinion is, is therefore they're entitled to a boat dock extension. COI~4ISSIONER BRUET: it would seem inappropriate to hold 13 hostage for something that might happen on Lot 30. They may not even build a boat dock. Everyone doesn't have a boat dock that lives on the water. CO~4ISSIONER OATES: Some people don't even have a boat. CO~4ISSIONER BRUET: Yes. So, I don't think we should be holding a lot for any -- CHAIPdV~24 DAVIS: Yes, Mr. Nelson. COM}:ISSiONER NELSON: I tend to agree with Mike that the lot across from Lot 13 has flexibility in terms of where they can build. The lot across from Lot 14 has some flexibilities. It seems to be wider. There's nothing across from Lot 15. So, actually even on a precedent basis I don't think we have a problem area. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Okay. Any other questions of the petitioner? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Is there anyone else here today that has anything they would like to speak about on this petition? (No response.) CHAIR/MAN DAVIS: Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. CO~4ISSIONER BRUET: Mr. Chairman, I recommend we approve Petition BD-97-22 subject to staff's stipulations. COMHISSIONER YORK: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion of approval by Mr. Bruet, seconded by Mr. York. Ail those in favor? Opposed? (No response.) Page 10 16G 1 November ~, 1997 CHAI~4AiN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. COI~MISSiONER YORK: i have a co~ent. CHAI~Z3~ DAVIS: Yes, Mr. York. CO[~4ISSIONER YORK: You know, we see a lot of these boat dock extensions coming in here, and to my recollection, for the most part they all get approved, which brings to mind in my estimation as to whether or not the current code has too much -- is too stringent on boat dock widths and maybe we ought to take a look at that to see if maybe give the property o'~ers a little more latitude. CHAIRMA/q DAVIS: You k~ow, we talked -- we talked about this. I4R. MULHERE: We just did a comprehensive review of the boat dock section in the last LDC amendment which we brought back and forth in front of you and which you approved. CHAI~4A_N DAVIS: And the other thing, too, is it gives the public that opportunity, that added bit of scrutiny and the opportunity, as we found just recently with one on Isle of Capri, I think it was, where even this board was in disagreement about whether or not it should or shouldn't be approved. I~R. ~4ULHERE: I'm not sure. It's argued both ways whether or not in the changes we made, we made it more stringent or less stringent. I've heard both sides of the argument. COI~MISSIONER YORK: What appears -- MR. MULHERE: I thought it was a little bit less stringent. - COmmISSIONER YORK: Well -- and I got the other way that -- that, you ~ow, we even tightened it up a little bit more. MR. 14ULHERE: Yeah. CO~4ISSIONER YORK: But I continued to see, you know, meeting after meeting that we see two or three of these boat docks and -- ~. MTJLHERE: Well, you're right. COI~ISSIONER YORK: -- for the most part, they get approved. ~. I4ULHERE: Well, you're right. Most do. But then we get the controversial one or two. I don't think we'll have quite as many of those due to recent changes in the political nature of Collier County but, you know. CO~MISSIONER ~RAGE: ?~at's Rocky think? ~at do you think, make more stringent or less stringent? MR. SCOFIELD: I -- I don't see too much a change. I think the application now is a little bit -- the application is more explicit and easier -- COMMISSIONER %'~RAGE: Correct. MR. SCOFiELD: -- easier to fill out. There's no question abouti!i that. I like the fact that the boathouses are now under a boat dock' extension instead of a conditional use. There's not much difference but instead of a $700 application fee, the people pay the four and a quarter now and it doesn't have to go in front of the commission unless it's contested. But I -- I don't see -- to be honest, I don't see a whole lot of change other than that, the boathouses, so, I think it's a pretty fair system. MR. MULHERE: Yeah. I think we -- what we try to do is make it a little bit more understandable and measurable because not being Page 11 Nove.T2oer 6, 1997 experts ourselves and yet being required to analyze these, we -- we look to -- to develop language that, you know, was more understandable to the average person and also for us, that you could read it and be able to, you know, make a clear determination yes or no. For example, the nature of speed in water in the area was Due o~ the old criteria. And it really didn't make any sense. Everybody said the same thing, tidal in nature. So, we tried to make it a little more understandable. I~R. SCOFIELD: The biggest problem we face is -- is the dredging part. A~d there's a lot of people who, you know, it would be more advantageous for them to dredge because dock -- these are -- a lot of these areas are always shoaling in. The state -- I mean there's -- they're always contested. You know, we have to prove to the state that it's not their waters, that it's man-made, or whatever the situation is, in order to dredge, to do maintenance dredging. A lot of times that gets very expensive and lengthy. They don't look favorably on it so that is -- this is why we're here most of the time. You know, people would rather not spend the money going out further. They'd like to be tucked in closer to their lot and not spend the extra money but -- and then the cost for coming here. But the dredging is the biggest issue that we're -- we're facing and that's why we're here most of the time. CHAI~43d$ DAVIS: Ail right. With that, we'll move on to Petition V-97-11. Once again, I'll ask all those here today that are going to speak on this petition, please stand and raise your right hands so that you may be sworn. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) CHAi~J~N DAVIS: 14r. Reischl. :~,. REISCHL: Good morning, commissioners. Fred Reischl, planning services. This is a request for an after-the-fact variance for a pool and pool cage in %he Flamingo Estates subdivision. It's a little bit unusual because it's a double frontage lot; however, the code says that if the o~her structures on this -- on the double frontage lots have a predominant yard pattern, then the planning services director may reduce th~ front yard, which in this case is effectively the rear -- rear yard. This appears to have been done in 1977 when the building permit w~s issued. The building permit was issued for a 15-foot rear yard setback. However, as you know, in 1977 there were no spot surveys. The pool and cage appears to have been built to within eight fe~,t · of the rear yard. That's seven feet ~nto the 15-foot drainage easement and two feet into what is today the rear yard setback for the pool and accessory structure. If you look at the -- COP~ISSIONER YORK: You say two -- two feet? MR. REISCHL: Two feet is what is being requested in this variance because of today's standards. If you look at the picture, at the photo, on Page 5 of the Staff Page 12 16G 1 :]o';ember 6, :997 Report, you can get an idea that the -- even though the pool cage encroaches into the drainage easement, you can see that black ~i shadowing in the foreground is the actual steep slope canal or ditch, I guess, is a more appropriate word. And the pool doesn't come close to the canal. It is set back from the canal -- or ditch. So, there is no encroac,hment into the actual ditch. And a picture on Page 6, you can see on the left, kind of shadowy in that reproduction, the pool cage of ]4r. Bennett's house and in the house to the west on the right side of the photo, so you can see the -- the difference in the setbacks from that yard. But you can also see that it's not anywhere near the drainage ditch. This photo, both photos, were taken from North Road, so they are at the -- across -- let's see -- at the north end of the subject ~ property. One other complicating factor, if you will, is the fact that there was no final inspection on the building per-mit that was issued in 1977. The petitioner states that he at the time left it up to the contractor and the contractor never called in the final inspection. But another factor that came before the board approximately two weeks ago, the petitioner requested a vacation of that seven feet worth of drainage easement and the board granted that. So, within the last two weeks, that drainage ditch problem has basically gone away.- Staff sees that this has been in existence for 20 years and we had no complaints on record. We received no complaints within the advertising period. However, because the building permit was never final, staff was constrained from recommending approval on this. And staff recommended that this be forwarded to the BZA with a recommendation of denial. CHA. I~N DAVIS: I have a catch-22 for you. t&R. REISCHL: Yes. Yeah. CHAI~43~N DAVIS: We can appreciate that, Mr. Reischl. Any questions of staff? CO~4ISSIONER YORK: Yeah. ~y -- you know, why is this coming to light now after 19777 M/~. REISCHL: Sale. CO~4ISSIONER YORK: Sale? MR. REISC}[L: Sale of the home. ;~ COmmISSIONER YORK: Okay. Thank you. i~ COPIMISSIONER PRIDDY: And what is the -- what is the procedure for getting a final inspection at this point? I mean is -- that just goes away? i M2q. REiSCHL: Well, one of the stipulations in the building permit, which Mr. Bennett's going to address, too, and, excuse me, in' the resolution is that a building permit be obtained because a building permit that wasn't final expires within six months, so staff is recommending a new building permit be issued and the final inspection be done on that building permit. CHAIrmAN DAVIS: Wouldn't the contractor be responsible for that if they're still in existence after 20 years? MR. REISCHL: As I -- I would think that would be illegal. I Page 13 November 6, '997 mean, i'm not going to render any -- CHA. i~.U~; DAVIS: Okay. Amy other questions of staff? (No response.) CHAi~.~ DAVIS: [dr. Bennett. And before Mr. Bennett speaks, i need to state for the record that Mr. Bennett and i spoke on the phone about ~' =,,is issue and -- okay. Mr. Bennett? MR. BE~R,[ETT: Good morning. For the record, i'm Richard Bennett, the property ov,~er of Lot 11, Block C in ?i~ingo Estates. And I dropped off to each of you before the meeting started this morning two-thirds of a yardstick and my purpose =or so doing is to illustrate the fact that, gentlemen, this is why we're ail here today. As Mr. Reischt observed, the County Ccr,~issioners have resolved the problems with the drainage easement, which is, i think, by far the stickier problem. We are left with this 24 inches, it doesn't look very imposing but this 24 inches has enough clout to have -led up my sale for three months, since my house was supposed to close on August 29th, and it's: still on hold, my buyers are hanging on by the ends of their fingernails, waiting for this thing to be resolved. I've also, of course, been involved : ~n about three months of red tape with the county. I would add I want to pass along for the record though the fact that i'm appreciative of the -- you know, the helpfulness and the treatment from the county staff and the -- you ~now, in the Planning Department, Mr. Reischl and his cohorts. Although they were constrained to recor~end denial, they certainly treated me verv well and were very -- as helpful as they could possibly be. We bought this property in 1994, having come from out of state and not being sa~f. ~ was in banking, running a trust department at the time, was not sa'~ry about construction matters at all. COI~fISSIONER OATES: I think you mean '74, don't you, in 19 -- ~<R. BENNETT: '74. i'm sorry. Yes. Thank you. '74. We had little kids who couldn't swim so we didn't want a house with a pool. But in three years they had learned to swim, so in '77, we constructed the pool, got Polk Threlkeld in Nassau Pools Construction. it was the most reputable contractor we could find at the -ime. Unfortunately, he's deceased right now or I probably would be ~fter him, would be standing on top of his desk at this point. And we, of course, naturally relied on him to take care of these things like CO's which we knew nothing about at the time. If you'll excuse a personal reference, this summer was a -- I -- I address this s~v~er with what we call mixed emotions. You k~ow, it's something like seeing your mother-in-law drive off a cliff in your new Cadillac My daughter got married in June, and for fathers who've gone through this experience, you also view this with mixed emotions, joy and poverty. So, truthfully, I was subverse to have some money borrowed, ready to -- ready to pay off the wedding expense with the sale of my house which, of course, hasn't happened. Page 14 ~;ovem2~er ~, 1997 We're looking at something, gentlemen, that's been lying there for 20 years. If there were technical requirements, which I can resolve with Mr. Reischl or whatever that may be, i would add i.f I have to get a building permit now, I want to do it in 1977 prices. And, so, if this has not been a problem for 20 years, I don't think it's going to become a problem in the future, and I thank you. Mrs. Stewart is with me from our law firm. Was 5here anything that you might contribute? MS. STEWART: Good morning, gentlemen. Other than to lend support to ~4r. Bennett, i know -- THE COURT REPORTER: Would you, please, identify yourself? MS. STEWART: Oh, I'm sorry. Deborah Stewart. I'm an attorney. I practice law with Mr. Bennett. I have personal knowledge of most of the things that he said. I was just a child in the mid seventies, so beyond that I -- about the financial hardship, i do ?~ow it would cause him and his family financial hardship if they're not granted the variance as far as trying to find another buyer, possibly having to dig up the pool, tak9 do'~aq ~he pool cage. It has been there for 20 years. i know he -- from what i do know about him, he is the type of person who would not have known or would have relied on the contractor ~o have followed through and obtained the Certificate of Occupancy. Thank you. CHAI~43uN DAVIS: Thank you. Is %here anyone else to speak on this petition today? (No response.) CF~I~.IAN DAVIS: With that, I'll close the public hearing. CO~MiSSIONER YORK: ~. Chairman? CHAI~ DAVIS: Mr. York. CO~C4iSSIONER YORK: I would move that we forward Petition V-97-11 to the BZA wi~h a recommendation for approval. COI~4ISSIONER OATES: Second. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Motion of approval by Mr. York, seconded by Mr. Oates. Question; Mr. Reisch!, on the building permit issue, it's -- it's -- from your standpoint, it's imperative that that building permit be obtained? ~,. REISCHL: I don't think it's imperative. It -- that would b~ your decision whether you're going to recommend that to the board. ~4R. ~4ULHERE: I think we can talk to you, Mr. Perico, and I -- you know, somehow the record should be clean. Maybe they should go down and do a vclun -- you know, an inspection voluntarily and try to,~ you know, ~o certify it. CHAI~4A/q DAVIS: It just struck me that there ought to be a simpler way to resolve that. I mean, we've -- obviously have a situation that for 20 years has not caused anybody a problem and, you ~ow, being -- being a contractor, it -- you know, it's our responsibility for such things, and sometimes they do get forgotten. ~. MULHERE: Yeah. I think it's just a standard stipulation when a CO hasn't been issued. We'll have to take a look at it. COM24ISSIONER OATES: Yeah. Page 15 16G 1 Nove?2Der 6, 1997 COHMISSiONER YORK: But if we -- this variance is approved, doesn't that make all that go away? i mean -- ~,. REISCHL: No. The variance is for the distance, the encroachment. Basically, as Bob said, the -- a voluntary inspection would meet the same effect if you want to remove condition -- I think it was two -- that would be your prerogati';e. ~U2R. ~ULHERE: Well, I would suggest just making that a recommendation so he can carry it to the board. CHAirmAN DAVIS: With the -- Mr. York, would you be willing to add to your motion that as part of our motion, a recommendation of approval that staff research what -- what very easy way there may be to resolve the building permit issue? COI~4ISSIONER 'fORK: Without question. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Okay. P~P,. PFISCHL: And report that to the board? CHAI~kN DAVIS: Great. Discussion? Any more discussion? {No response.) CHAI~4A/4 DAVIS: Ail ~hose in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.} CHAI~4A2~ DAVIS: Carries unanimously. And, Mr. Bennett, two-thirds of a yardstick, nice touch, nice touch. ~&R. BENNETT: Ail the other discussion, I didn't want it construed as a bribe. CO~MISSiONER YORK: Well, we have to give them back. CH~i~4AN DAVIS: Mr. Nelson. COM~ISSIONER NELSON: Yes. CO~ISSIONER YORK: Would you like these to give them to the BZA? CO~4ISSIONER NELSON: I wanted to ask, Mr. Chairman, Ms. Student, whether it is now zhe contractor's responsibility to -- to have it inspected, get the permits due or is it still the property owner's responsibiii~y? MS. STUDENT: I don't -- I don't deal in those issues. Maybe staff would be able. i ghink it depends on whether it's an owner, the t3~e of permit you get. I ~ow there are two types of permits that you get. As an owner-builder would be one and then when you have a contractor. And if you're an owner-builder, I think it would probabl~ be up to you to get it, and if you have your contractor do it, probably up to them, but staff might be able to give you a little more information. 1~R. ~.~LHERE: It's uhe responsibility of the individual or :ompany who pulls the permit. You know, for commercial or multifamily, that's generally a commercial contractor. But the system has changed so much over the years that -- that this just doesn't happen to the extent that it used to. There's too many checks and balances. . Now, you know, if -- if within a certain period of time the final inspection hasn't been requested, which would trigger the CO, then the contractor is notified and the property o~rner is notified. That Page 16 16G 1 November 6, 1997 didn't happen then, so -- COM>~ISSIONER NELSON: Yeah. That answers my question. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Yeah. There's a -- I can speak with some knowledge in our business that there will come a time where the computer -- they'll do a computer check and we may have two or three that for one reason or another the final, maybe we called it in but it got lost in the system, or we just simply forgot to call it in. So, yeah, as Mr. Mulhere points out now, there's checks and balances and having lived here back in the seventies, pre-computers, I -- you know, almost an impossibility. COmmISSIONER PRIDDY: As a small child? CHAI~fAN DAVIS: No. That was Miss Stewart's line. All righty, then. Let's move right along to Petition V-97-12. COI~4ISSIONER BUDD: Mr. Chairman, I need to recuse myself. I've served on the Board of Trustees for Seacrest School. CHAIP34AN DAVIS: Well, since my child no longer goes to Seacrest, £ think i'm okay. Would all those present today that are going to testify on this petition, please stand and raise your right hand and the court reporter will swear you in. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) CHAI~iA~N DAVIS: Mr. Bellows. MIR. BELLOWS: For the record, Ray Bellows presenting Petition V-97-12, Mr. Alfred French, representing the Seacrest Country Day School. We're requesting a six-foot height variance from the required 30-foot maximum height limit in the estate zoning district to allow for a 36-foot-tall resource building. The subject site contains an existing private school that was constructed in 1986. In June of '97, the Board of County Commissioners -- or Zoning Appeals approved the conditional use for the expansion of this school. Subsequently, the site development plan was approved with conforming heights. However, during the design and review of the buildings, the -- it was determined that to improve the architectural appearance of the campus, the resource building was redesigned with a hip roof and a clock tower to provide a more uniform campus design. It will serve as its focal point for the campus. The hip roof design is intended to complement both the existing and the proposed buildings. The additional six feet in height is needed to obtain the proper roof pitch to complement the scale of the building. However, the surrounding buildings that are going to be added will conform to the maximum 30-foot building height. The Seacrest campus is located on a platted lot, which is somewhat long and narrow. The shape of the lot dictated arrangement of the buildings along this center access and, therefore, it made perfect sense to design this recentered, resource building in the center with the clock tower to serve as a focal point. As you can see on the graphics, it's centrally located on site. It will not be within a hundred feet of any side property line; therefore, there will be no impact on the adjacent properties. Page 17 16G 1 November 6, 1997 Staff has not received any letters for or against this petition; therefore, staff is recommending that the County Planning Commission forward Petition V-97-12 to the Board of Zoning Appeals with the recommendation of approval. ~ CHAiPdVLAN DAVIS: Questions of staff? Mr. Nelson. CO~4ISSiONER NELSON: Mr. Bellows, I thought it was interesting that the clock tower is 50 feet and that's exempt from this and I just -- FER. BELLOWS: Yeah. The Land Development Code has that exemption in its definition section of measuring building heights. ~ bfR. ~ULHERE: Cupolas, architectural clock towers, architectural embellishments, things like that are exempt from the height -- the height restrictions. Another thing I would just add is that it's only one foot higher than we allow in our single family district. Thirty-five feet is the maximum height in a single family district. CHA. i~4A~N DAVIS: Any other questions? (No response.) Do we have a petitioner? MR. FRENCH: t4embers of the Planning Commission, I'm Alfred French from Alfred French and Associates. We're architects for the project and the staff has done such an excellent job of summarizing. the petition and the pertinent issues that I think a long presentation isn't necessary. The only thing I think I would like to mention is that, as we started this project, the school needed additional space for their students and they needed a new resource center. And because of the geometry of the site, the only place to put it was in the center of the site and to relocate Unity Way, which we've done. And we tried very sincerely to find architectural solutions which met this 30-foot zoning area. A flat roof didn't seem appropriate with the existing gable roofs. We've tried to make the new buildings, ~.:hich are sho%.n in blue, and these are the existing buildings in brovm, in tan here. The Resource Center is right there. The Resource Center is right in the center. We tried to make them flat, the flat roofs, and that wasn't successful. We dropped the pitch and it was very unattractive because it's a very big building. It's almost 18,000 s .cTuare feet on two floors. And with a Ouilding that big, a low pitch roof just wasn't attractive, so we went to the board and showed them all the alternatives. We tried a Mansard roof that was just cut off and came to the conclusion that this was not only more complementary and appropriate for the school, it was a win-win situation for everyone. It's more attractive for the neighbors in my view. So, i won't say more -- CHAI~43dq DAVIS: Thank you. MR. FRENCH: -- unless you have questions. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. French. Any questions of the petitioner? (No response.) Page 18 !6G November 6, 1997 CHAi~ZJkN DAVIS: Is there anyone else here today to speak on this? CO~41SSIONER BUDD: Gentlemen, Russell Budd, for the record, i just had to say something because I never get a chance to talk to you on the side. I serve as a member of the Board of Trustees for Seacrest and a~, also the general contractor for the project that they're doing. I met with Mr. Ken Erdley, who is a representative of the Rosewood Condominiums in Falling Waters that's immediately to the east of the subject property, and discussed the -- the variance and what we're doing, and he was in agreement with us that a slightly taller and attractive building was very much preferable to a short, ugly building and was in complete agreement. And, also, Mr. Erdley, and -- and I'm sure the other residents of Falling Waters, were appreciative of the fact that in the process of doing our site work, the berm that~ is on the Falling Waters side of the property line, which contained exotics and weeds was built up, we've removed and cleaned that up and assured them that the landscaping would be appropriate to minimize any potential sight lines. So, they're -- they're in agreement and we -- we are pushing for a tall, attractive building. CHAI~J~N DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Budd. Anyone else to speak on this petition? (No response.) CHAIRMA34 DAVIS: You know, they keep talking here. They -- they may very well -- CO~4MISSIONER NELSOn;: Talk themselves out of it, right. CHAI~ZJ~N DAVIS: Or defeat from the jaws of victory. I'm not sure. With %hat, I'll close the public hearing. CO~ISSIONER PRIDDY: Mr. Chairman -- oh -- CO:.~ISSiONER OATES: Second. CHAi~,IAN DAVIS: A very quick motion from the right end by Mr. Priddy of approval. CO~MISSiONER PRIDDY: ?~en you serve with Mr. Oates, you better be quick. CHAI?24JdJ DAVIS: The second was by Mr. Oates. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) C.qAi~3~; DAVIS: That carries unanimously. i said before tha~ my son attended Seacrest or doesn't attend Seacrest anymore. He had a very good experience at Seacrest, I might add. Tha% brings us to PUD-90-32(1), an encore performance by Mr. Bellows. i'd ask all those here today that are going to testify on this petition to please stand, raise your right hands so that you may be sworn by the court reporter. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) Page 19 ~;ovember ~, 1997 CF~i~,UuN DAVIS: Mr. Bellows. 14R. BELLOWS: For the record, Ray Bellows. Bruce Anderson is representing Mr. Wayne C. Ashley. They're requesting an amendment t~ the Ashley service station PUD and to rezone Lot 19 to add it, ,~ incorporate that within the PUD boundaries of the project. They also proposed to eliminate all service station repair uses and replacing it with a fast food restaurant as to the list of permitted uses. The petitioner states that the o'~ner has not been able to operate the service station at this location economically and is requesting the switch of the planned use to allow for a fast food restaurant, which is a trend that many gas stations are now incorporating, either a -- some type of fast food restaurant within the existing structure. They're not expanding the building itself but just changing the uses within. As a result of that change, there's additional parking required and, as you can see on the site plan, the proposed traffic circulation will come through around back with a drive t,hrough window. This is ',.;here the old septic tank was so they're moving it to lot -- the adjacent lot, 19. Heavily landscaped and a potential employee parking may be placed over here. But they do have enough adequate parking on the existing site. The traffic circulation element review indicates that ~he project will ~ ~ ' g_n_~a~e aDproximately 200 additional trips in the change of uses and that's a per day increase. However, that will not affect any level of service standards and the Golden Gate Parkway will continue to operate at an acceptable level of service. The project is consistent with the Growth :4anagement Plan. It should be noted that the project could probably go on without doing the PUD amendment. Through an off-site parking agreement, it could still accomplish the same thing. Staff has not received any -- oh, one letter in opposition or having expres:~:ed some concerns with landscaping, i'll pass you out the copies of the letters. CO:,24ISSIONER YORK: Ray, has there been any determination as to~ what fast food operation will be going or might be going in? ?~. BELLCWS: I think Mr. Anderson can state who it is. I believe it's McDonald's? CO~4ISSIONER 'fORK: Pardon me? ~,. BELLOWS: McDonald's. CH~i~4AN DAVIS: Mr. Bellows, do the landscaping requirements meet or exceed the code? :,~. BELLOWS: i think it -- right now it meets the code but there may be some plants that are not -- did not make it and it may need updating and replacing, but the landscaping around the proposed expansion onto Lot 19 meets the current code. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: i see. And on this letter though, the petitioner's representative may very well have some comments. Questions of staff? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Petitioner? Page 20 No','em~er 6, !997 I,~. ANDERSON: Good morning, Mr. Chairman, commissioners. For the record, my n~e is Bruce Anderson on behalf of Mr. Ashley. Mr. Rellows has done a fine job of explaining essentially what -- what we propose to do, is eliminate approximately a full page limiinB of different automobile repair uses that are contained in the current PUD and substituting for that an operation of a fast food restaurant.- There are two existing service bays that are part of the -- this building. A third one was authorized when this PUD was approved. That third bay was never built. This PUD amendment would eliminate the possibility of any further expansion of that building. It deletes the third service bay and those two service bays would be converted to a McDonald's restaurant with approximately 35 seats and a drive through window. The entrance to the McDonald's would only be through the convenience store. There would not be a separate outside entrance. There is, however, a separate emergency exit only that's required by fire code that would be there. Let me emphasize that there will be no expansion of the existing building. And there are also no changes to the road access points. , This PUD amendment would add a fourth lot. The original PUD was comprised of three lots, two of which front on Golden Gate Parkway. This fourth lot is currently zoned RMF-!2. It would permit a duplex to go on there. We're proposing to add it to the PUD, landscape it; put a septic tank drain field on there and perhaps some employee parking. That would be it. No structures other than that. One of the advantages of that is that you eliminate the density that would be associated with that lot. ~ I believe included in your agenda packet should be a letter of support from the Golden Gate Area Civic Association. I made a presentation to that group several weeks ago and their principal '!t' request was that the PUD be brought up to current Land Development Code requirements for landscape buffering. We will be submitting a revised PUD which does provide for that with one exception, where Lot 14 -- where Lot 15 abuts Lot 14 on the front of Golden Gate Parkway, there is a -- a public alley that s~raddles the property line now. And it provides access to an aile~way that extends westward the entire length of that lot. The Land Development Code would normally require a ten-foot landscape buffer; however, all that we have available on our property~ is six feet within which we can put landscaping and we'll put it in 5hat six feet. Otherwise we'd have to petition the county to destroy some of their p~vement and we don't think that would fly. !~ And I'll be happy to answer any questions that any of you may ~ have. ~! CHAIRMAN DAVIS: l{r. Priddy. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Mr. Anderson, it seems that one of the complaints from -- in this letter that was sent in against this was a hedge being placed along the back of the property. Is that -- will that be done or -- ~ I~R. ANDERSON: Yes. Yes. There will be a perimeter hedge arouhd that new lot that is added. Page 21 Novermber 6, 1997 COi~,[iSSIONER PR!DDY: In the existing -- lq.. .ANDERSON: in the existing -- yes, yes, yes. I notice one of the thing -- one of the concerns, and this realIY isn't so much a letter of opposition as it is to express some concerns. I do want to note that. One of his points, one of the guy's concern is about the vehicles that have been using that lot that we propose to add as a cut through. My client isn't any happier about that than the neighbors are. And by landscaping this, we will be able ~o keep people from driving across that unless they want to tear up their vehicle. CHAi~N DAVIS: And with that, Mr. Anderson, it would seem that Mr. -- Mr. Dahlmann's concerns here would -- would be met? ~R. ANDERSON: Yes. COI~i£SiONER YORK: The hedge -- the hedge that has not been maintained properly and -- and in his contention that the fence needs some repair, that would all be taken care of? i could support that -- the petition if we had that commitment from the D=~itioner ?~R. ANDERSON: Well, the -- the fence on the west side, that currently exists on the west side of the building, that would be removed because we're incorporating the adjacent lot and we're going ~ to have, like I said, landscaping on the farther western end of this7 One of the problems, quite frankly, is -- is Mr. Ashley's had trouble getting wax myrtle to grow there and so we're going to take a careful look at the plant species list and see if we can't find something else that will meet code requirement that has a little bit better chance of success. COI~MISSIONER BRUET: They're -- they're basically wet plants. A little better selection would help. CO~.E4ISSIONER YORK: Brazilian Pepper will grow. COI~MiSSIONER PEDONE: Brazilian Pepper might grow well. CHAi~u~ DAVIS: i think the point is, is with the addition of the lot and the landscaping there being to code, it, at least in my estimation, takes care of pretty much all the concerns here because the -- and as Mr. Anderson pointed out, the rest of it is going to be brought up to code as part of the -- with the one exception you spoke about, and I know those alleys in Golden Gate have become a real necessity for us. M~. ~,~LHERE: May I just add, the only issue would be -- or for consideration is that the code required plantings, I believe, are 24 inches at the time of planting. It's generally possible to achieve more opacity and thicker planting ~f you put ~n a little larger plan~i material in those areas. That's something you might want to consider~ Cocopl~Yb generally grows pretty well and pretty opaque. CO~4ISSIONER PRIDDY: Mr. Chairman, a member of the public would! like to speak that did not get sworn in initially -- C}~I~4AN DAVIS: Okay. COP[MISSIONER PRIDDY: -- if we can accommodate that. CHAIRMA/~ DAVIS: Sure. No problem. Questions -- any other questions of the petitioner's representative? Page 22 16G 1 1997 (No response.) CHAI~3~N DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Anderson. Was it you that wanted to speak? Okay. When you get to podium, if you could raise your right hand and the cour5 reporter will swear you in. (The witness was sworn by the court reporter.) CHAIP24AN DAVIS: If you could, state your name for the record. MS. HEATER: My name is Marsha Herter. I'm a property owner in the direct vicinity. I'm two blocks from the ~4obil station. I'm on 25th Avenue and I'm only two kouses in. I live with the noise of the ~4obii station every single night of the week. The owner of the station does not monitor in any way that is noticeable the noise of the cars that sit there and park with their loud radios thumping and we have had to cease opening our windows at night when the weather cools down because it's so loud, that our bedroom is on the back of our house, which is on that side, and we can't sleep. So, I am concerned about an additional amount of business going in and out. Also, the side street that feeds into Mobil station, I believe it's 47th. Is that correcs? CO1,2~ISSIONER BUDD: That's correct. MS. HERTER: Is absolutely inade.cfuate for the Mobil station as i.t is. .And I say that because of the numerous near accidents that we have had going to and from our house on a daily basis. Cars pull out of that area without looking every single day and ~ there are bicyclists on ~heir way to Golden Gate Middle School who cross over there without watching and children on their way to Golden Terrace Elementary who also are not careful. And I really have come within inches of hitting children there as well as cars who pull out in front of me when I come in off of the Parkway. Tha~ takes care o~ the noise factor and traffic. I'm concerned about trash. We are continually picking up Mobil cups, cans, bottles, whiskey bottles, whatever the alcoholic beverages are that they serve. We find them on our corner in bags and they are from the Mobil s~ation. I question the need for a McDonald's or any other fast food restaurant on our corner. We have one within a mile or a mile and a half up by 951. We also have within a mile to two miles of that neighborhood Blimpie, Little Caesar, Pizza Hut, KFC, Burger King, Subway, Taco Caliente, be -- used to be Juicy Lucy's, American Grill,~ Domino's and various pizza and Chinese eateries. I question the needl for a McDonald's fast food on that corner. The increased traffic in the school zone again is my biggest concern as well as noise. Something needs to be done with that street as it is. I'm concerned that there doesn't seem to be in the plans a differen~ access or egress from that lot, from that site, except for that street. It's -- it's in poor repair. There are potholes along is. I hit one every time I round the corner. It's just a ve~t tight, difficult street going by the Mobil station. I will add I've been at that property for seven years. W"nen Page 23 :,;ovember 6, 1997 i bought my property, there was no Mobil station and I had no idea of the noise that would be involved and the traffic and I definitely would not have built my home there. I have -- I have a personal friend who is an appraiser with Hunt: group and he has told me the value of my house has dropped since the I{obi! station was put on that corner. And i'm not happy about that either. That's not the issue here, however, except that making it busier is only going to decrease the value of my property as far as I'm concerned. And we are looking at possibly selling in the next couple of years and moving farther out where it's not so noisy. Thank you. I appreciate your time. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Thank you. Anyone else to speak on this petition today? (No response.) CHAi~4A/q DAVIS: Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. ~4otion? COI~{!SSiONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, I move we recommend approval of ~?,en~ent of PUD-90-32(1) to the Board of County Commissioners -- CO~{ISSiONER PRIDDY: Second. COI~ISSIONER OATES: -- subject to the staff stipulations. CHAI~4A2q DAVIS: There's a motion of approval -- recommendation of approval by Mr. Oates, seconded by Mr. Budd, was it? -i~ COI~.IISSIONER BUDD: No. Mr. Priddy. i~ CHAIP/4A/W DAVIS: I'm sorry. 14r. Priddy. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIN.DAN DAVIS: It carries unanimously. CO~-~MISSiONER BRUET: ~4r. Chairman, I have a comment. CHAi~4AN DAVIS: Okay. Mr. Bruet. CO~'~ISSIONER BRUET: Aren't some of the lady's problems code enforcement problems? ~4S. STUDENT: Yes. CHAi?14AN DAVIS: Yeah. I think -- and I think -- I'm glad you brought that up, 14r. Bruet, because the staff people that are here, I think, know by our record that anytime there's anything brought up in the way of code enforcement problems during these hearings, that we know that you are good about notifying Ms. Linda Sullivan about it. ~ MR. BELLOWS: Yeah. I was planning to do that as a result of comments made today, that we will -- CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Thank you. MR. BELLOWS: -- go and check and make sure that those pothole i! problems and other things are looked into. ~ CHAIPi~.N DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Bellows. And thank you, Mr. Bruet. With that, Petition R-97-6. Mr. Nino. CO~4ISSIONER BRUET: Mr. Chairman, I need to recuse myself in that my employer owns the property. CHAI.~ DAVIS: It seems reasonable. Anyone else? (No response.) Page 24 16G 1 November 6, 1997 CHAIPliA/~ DAVIS: Just a -- just a comment, i notice -- I notice. that this last petition -- apparently this was an out-of-town developer from up in Georgia someplace. COI&MISSIONER OATES: ?~en did you move to Georgia, Curl~ UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: Pardon me? COM~4ISSIONER OATES: ?~en did you move to Georgia? UNIDENTIFIED SPEAKER: Well, just temporarily. I went up to visit up about two years ago. CHAIP/MAN DAVIS: Ail righty. With that, all those here today to testify on this petition, please stand, raise your right h~nd so that the court reporter may swear you in. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) CHAiP24AN DAVIS: Mr. Nino. ~&R. NINO: Yes, Ron Nino, for the record. The petition that's before you would have you recommend the rezoning of property that's currently zoned industrial to the C-5 zoning classification. As you know, it's on South Horseshoe Drive and it houses the former Collier County Building Association? CHAiPg~N DAVIS: Uh-huh. ~&R. NINO: And immediately next to that building today is a very handsome looking office structure on the -- again, on the South Trail. The issues here are -- is the -- is the rezoning action consistent with the future land use element and it's staff's opinion that indeed it is on two counts. One, I think -- I think you -- one could argue that the definition for industrial in -- in that it talks about business services could very well include the barber shop and a beauty shop. Secondly -- secondly, the industrial requirements of the FLUE do provide for rezoning along the perimeter and we've had this case recently on Radio Road with respect tc -- CHA. I~4A_N DAVIS: Well, isn't -- ~<R. NINO: -- Progeny PUD. CHAI~43~N DAVIS: Mr. -- Mr. Nino, isn't that just the point that -- I mean, this is just an ideal situation. It seems that you get this sort of transitional use. M~. NINO: We think -- we think it is; however, the staff report identifies we have to appreciate that the FLUE also says that in that perimeter contexc, we won't have run-of-the-mill conventional retail t~es of facilities. Unfortunately, when you rezone something to C-5, you get the whole grab bag of C-1 to C-5. Consequently, we have to limit the number of uses that are permitted with this rezoning action to C-5 to i those that qualify with the transitional use requirement. Quite frankly, in the past we have attempted not to do that. And the Progeny PUD was a good example. The Progeny originally came in as C-5. Administratively, that places some burden on staff. And we hope that that will go away and I'm sure Bob will correct me if I say something that is erroneous, but I think you're making provisions to amend the LDC to allow personal services like barber shops and beauty shops in agricultural districts. Page 25 16G .1 November 6, 1997 I~R. 14ULHERE: Industrial. b~. NINO: Industrial districts, :~ C0b~ISSIONER PRIDDY: And this is on South Horseshoe aad not South Trail, right? MR. NINO: And, therefore, this issue would go away. We -- staff strongly endorses the recommendation, the -- the action to rezone this property to C-5 with the limit -- within the limited context that is defined in the amending ordinance which is ~ attached to your staff report. CHAi~.IAN DAVIS: And that's part of my point, Mr. Nino. My office being very near to this location, is those personal services being available to us in close proximity takes us off the trips on Airport Road and the surrounding streets -- ~dlq. NINO: Exactly. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: -- which, driving through that daily, there's already plenty of trips on there with the bridge construction going MR. NINO: If it were there, I could go and get a haircut which I need badly. MIR. I4ULHERE: I would only point out that our biggest concern or one of our concerns was relative to the impacts of redevelopment of ' this site or this parcel in relationship and in connection with access to Airport Road. And do you want to touch on that? -i MR. NINO: Yes, and you will note that one of the conditions --, thank you, Bob -- one of the conditions in the ordinance, the draft ordinance, is that there will be no ingress or egress from Airport Road. MIR. I~IULHERE: ~d, you know, Ron's correct. We are preparing as part of this package, which I'll hand out to you later, one of the proposed amendments is to allow for certain personal services within the industrial zoning district. They're thought of, in our opinion, as almost accessory to industrial uses and -- and -- well, to the -- to the employment base, is what I really mean to say, within an industrial area; a beauty salon, a barber shop, those types of things. But I think that -- that the applicant -- and we discussed that with him, whether or not they want to continue with the rezone process based on the fact that, you know, some of these uses would be permitted, but -- and i think the applicant wishes to continue with ~. r. he rezone process and they're consistent with -- because there are other uses that othe~;ise we're not going that far with, which may in the future be appropriate for this piece of property. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Okay. Questions of staff? Mr. Nelson. COMMISSIONER NELSON: Only one and -- and it may be in the form of a suggestion. As I'm looking through the permitted uses portion of the resolution, I -- I notice a reference to section two point two point one five and a half point two point one or something like that. MIR. MULHERE: Is that 157 MR. NINO: Two point two 15 and a half point two point one. Page 26 16G Nover2~er 6, 1997 COM~4ISSIONER NELSON: Anyway, I know I have a manual that indicates what all of those are, but if it's not a -- if it's not a great number, could you in the future print those also? We can just take a look at what all -- MR. NINO: Sure. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any other questions of staff? (No response.) CHAIP_MA_N DAVIS: Would the petitioner like to make a presentation? COMMISSIONER BRUET: For the record, Mike Bruet. ~,;o. Unlike my colleague, I'm not going to waste a lot of your time unless there are any questions. COMMISSIONER BUDD: I was going to vote for this. CHAIP~tAN DAVIS: Is there anyone else here today that would like to speak on this petition? (No response.) CHAIPd~AN DAVIS: Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. CO~ISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, i move we submit Petition R-97-6 to the appropriate organization, i think it's -- who is it, the Board of County Commissioners? I don't know. ?~omever0 for the recommendation of approval subject to the staff stipulations. COl&MISSIONER YORK: Second. CHAIR~N DAVIS: Motion for recommendation of approval by Mr. _ Oates, seconded by Mr. Oates -- excuse me -- by Mr. York. Discussion? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. Petition PUD-82-6(3) . I'd ask all those here today that are going to testify on this petition, to please stand and raise your right hand so that you may be sworn. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) CHAI~J~N DAVIS: ~.~. Nino. MR. NINO: Ron Nino, for the record. The petition before you would have you recommend an amendment to the Sabal Lakes PUD to take care of an issue that is not too clearly expressed within the current PUD document relative to the location of accessory structures; i.e., pool cages and their relationship to one another and to the principal building. That poses a tremendous administrative burden on staff. Regularly, we have customer services staff coming back to the planne. S and asking the same question over and over and over again. And we -- we really need to try harder to exhaust the possibilities that exist in -- in certain developments with respect to proximity of principal buildings to one another and we're always working very diligently to accomplish that. In the Sabal Lakes PUD, through administrative discretion, we have in fact allowed what this amendment clearly would enable us to Page 27 16F 1 NovemJoer 6, 1997 do. But we have been doing it under the exercise of considerable administrative discretion. And we have quite a few number of houses in Sabal Lakes that are in fact developed in accordance with the proposal that is before you, which would allow; i.e., swimming pool enclosures to be located at a zero -- on a zero lot line provided they're five feet away from a principal building; however, we still insist on a -- on a 10-foot spacing between accessory buildings and the -- your draft -- your draft ordinance or the staff report includes illustrations of those relationships. Those relationships are clearly what 770 houses have now been built to. We have not received any phone calls in opposition to this. ~ We've received phone calls asking what it's all about and after we've explained that, we've had no objections formally conveyed to the staff and we recommend that you recommend that this modification be made to the Sabal Lakes PUD. Mr. Greg Wardenberg is here, representing the Granite Construction Company, who own all of the lots that remain that he intends to build on and he has built the housing that is consistent with these development standards. ~ CF~I~ DAVIS: Questions of staff? (No response.) CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Questions of the petitioner? (No response.) CHAI~iAN DAVIS: The petitioner have anything they would like to add? (No response.) CHAI~J~N DAVIS: Anyone else to speak on this petition today? MS. DENNIS: I wasn't sworn in though. CH~i~.~AN DAVIS: If you could come forward to the microphone, please. ~S. DENNIS: I wasn't sworn in though. CHAi~4A/W DAVIS: Pie can take care of that when you get up to the microphone. If you'd raise your right hand, the court reporter will swear you in. MS. DENNIS: For the record, my name is Wanda Dennis. (The witness was sworn by the court reporter.) CHAIR/MAN DAVIS: Please go ahead. MS. DENNIS: My question is, what happens when lots that already have their cement to that point zero lot, what do we do? ~R. NINO: You know what she's referring to? I~P,. WARDENBERG: I think I do. I can probably address that. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: If you could identify yourself for the record? MIR. WARDEN~,ERG: Yes. I'm sorry. I'm Greg Wardenberg with Granite Development and I'm also the qualifier for the construction company building homes out there for Granite Construction. There are a number of homes that are already built. In the Dennis' case, they've got a slab that will be -- it was intended for a screen enclosure, but they just put in the concrete portion of that. What we have been doing on those types of things when -- and there's no house built on the lot next to it, it's a first come, first served basis I'm aware of how that accessory structure goes. So, with Page 28 November 6, 1997 them already being out to that property line, we have to maintain that ten-foot distance between accessory structures on the next house. So, in any case, you know, it wouldn't affect your house. We would still have to maintain that ten feet. CHAIRYJLN DAVIS: So, in the -- so, for the record in Miss -- Ms. Dennis' case, she'll be okay. MR. WARDENBERG: Absolutely. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Okay. Thank you. Anything else? Anyone else to speak on this petition? ii' (No response.) CHAIPaMAN DAVIS: Close the public hearing. Motion? CO~4ISSIONER PRIDDY: Move we recommend an approval. COI~MISSIONER ?r~AGE: Second. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: A motion for recommendation of approval by the anchors, ~4r. priddy and ~4r. Wrage. Any discussion? (No response.) CHAIPdVuAN DAVIS: All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAI~4A_N DAVIS: Carries unanimously. CO~4ISSIONER OATES: I like bookends better. CHAi~43~N DAVIS: I like to think of them more as anchors personally, but -- Petition PUD-96-il(2). And, yes, ~4iss Bishop, this is when you stand up and raise your right hand. ~4S. BISHOP: i forgot my papers. CHAIPaMAN DAVIS: All those that are here today to testify on this petition, please stand and raise your right hand so the court reporter may swear you in. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Mr. Nino. ~&R. NINO: Ron Nino, for the record. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: You're going to like just close it out today, right? You're the closer. MR. NINO: I hope so. CHAIP_MAN DAVIS: Okay. PLR. NINO: The petition that's before you is pretty straightforward, it's -- it would have you recommend to the board that the communication towers be added to the Pelican Strand PUD as a permitted use within the commercially designated tract of Pelican Strand and, moreover, within that portion of the commercially designated tract that is next to the freeway. In other words, on -- well, I can't read that, but on -- on this tract which -- CO~MISSIONER YORK: Tract G? MR. NINO: -- is parallel -- Tract G, thank you. And immediately to the north of Tract G is the water management facility, so the nearest possible housing in Pelican Strand, we estimate, will be about 500 feet, well and beyond the two and a half foot requirements for the height of the -- of the communications tower. Page 29 i6G 1 November 6, 1997 here. COM/4ISSIONER YORK: And that's 170 feet, right, Ron? PLq. NINO: Correct. CO~,~ISSIONER YORK: Maximum height? MR. ~INO: Yes. Thank you. There are no consistency issues CHAIPdf3%N DAVIS: Mr. Nino -- MR. NINO: i believe we received -- we received no letters of opposition to this. CHAI~4A/q DAVIS: Mr. Nino, I don't necessarily have a problem ~ with this particular petition. We see in the news just recently in Charlotte County where they have now a moratorium on communication towers. ?~at are we doing as -- as a county to encourage the placement of multiple, and I'll probably get the nomenclature wrong here, multiple. antennas on the same tower and also at the recent APA conference, that I had the pleasure of attending, there was some discussion and graphics presented where they're being masked in other communities around the country through steeples. There was one, I think, where it was actually the steeple of a _ church that absolutely no -- very few people knew it contained a communication tower, which obviously presents the -- it kind of goes along the flight, right, I think, with our recent architectural standards we passed where they're being masked, which is, in all things considered, wonderful. I don't know if that's economically feasible in all cases, but I'd just appreciate your comments, either you or Mr. Mulhere. ~ MR. NINO: I don't have any comments over -- '~ ~4R. MULHERE: Well, the -- we do have a tower ordinance which has subsequently been incorporated into the LDC, requires anyone proposing to build a tower has to attempt first to find an existing tower, which they must -- first of all, when you built a tower, you have to agree to allow other people 5o share that tower with you. A~nd, secondly, when you propose to build a tower, you have to provide some evidence that you have attempted to find a tower to share or -- or why otherwise you cannot, whether it's a coverage issue or something like that. Bryan Milk is actually our sort of resident ex-pert, and if you'd like, I could bring him in for a future meeting to discuss it a little bit. '!' We have not gone so far as to require camouflaging, which some il lJeople do, but we do -- we do try to locate or place the towers in areas that they are less visible. And an example, I guess, is within a park system at some point out beyond the lights of the ball field s!o that, you know, you already have several structures that are that high, close to the 1-75 interchange, things like that. You know, it's something that we're always looking at and trying to stay on top of and it seems as though these types of land uses come in waves and all of a sudden you can't find enough information on towers and everybody wants a tower. So, you know, this is the tower time. MR. NINO: Yeah. One advantage, however, of these shorter towers Page 30 16G 1 November 6, 1997 is that -- that -- that at this height they're monopoles. They're -- they're not steel structures. They're monopoles at this height. And it's no different than -- at the interchange, that's ~o different than the light standards that FDOT puts up in terms of their CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Don't misunderstand me. I-- I think -- I can only judge it by my observations as I drive around the community and I don't notice a lot of them, so that tells me we're doing a pretty good job given that, from a development standpoint, I'm aware that we're more developed than Charlotte County would be where they seem to be having a problem. So, that -- that tells me that what we're doing must be working pretty well. Just -- just some thoughts for whatever they're worth. ~ Mr. York. CO~e.{ISSIONER YORK: i think -- well, if we -- if we recommend approval of this petition on that particular tract of land, that Tract G, how many towers could you erect there; one? Would that be a maximum? Are there -- within the code, are there limitations as to the number of towers on certain amount of acreage? MR. NINO: I don't believe there would be any limitation on Tract G. The only limitation we have is that it needs to be two and a half! times its height from the nearest residential zoning district. CO~{MISSIONER YORK: But you could put up three towers. - HR. NINO: You could put up more, yes. HR. :{ULHERE: But there is a requirement that the towers be shared, and i think that it probably reduces the likelihood of them putting up more than one tower. I don't think we'd let them do it because the tower ordinance says you must share. COPP[!SSIONER YORK: As long as there's some cross-check. b~. ~.uFULHERE: Yeah. When they get the approval, they sign an agreement to allow other users to share that -- that tower. I don't have the deta[is, i don't have -- I'd just as soon maybe bring in Bryan, who has a little bit more expertise on the tower ordinance, you know, who has a little more expertise. CHAi~A/.; DAVIS: It may be when we have another tower petition in the future that, you know, maybe Mr. Milk could come along, because it seems like there's some interest by this board that -- that -- just to kind of get a feel that -- what's going on and -- and I think there's also an economic incentive to sharing a tower that precludes it. Mr. Wrage. COMI4. ISSIONER WRAGE: Bob, just that I read this to understand that just this tower, if they want another one, they don't have to come back before this board? b~. NINO: No. That -- that's not the way the amendment was structured, if that were the case, we'd have to insert one, the number one, in front of the commercial towers, otherwise -- otherwise it's plural and -- and the only restriction would be the -- the location that the ~nendment is tied to, which is specifically Tract G. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: And that's the routine way to do it. In fact, a petition requests approval of towers for a particular location. Number has not been an issue in the past. Page 31 November 6, 1997 MR. NINO: Right. Yeah. MR. ~LHERE: They're otherwise subject to the requirements in the Land Development Code. MR. NINO: Yes. MIR. MULHERE: I'll make a copy of those requirements. They're extremely complicated. There's, I'd say, maybe 20 pages of regulations covering towers, so I'll make -- COb[MISSIONER OATES: Why don't you give us a little -- COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Don't make me a copy. COF24ISSIONER PEDONE: Synopsis. COMMISSIONER OATES: -- synopsis of 20 pages? MR. MULHERE: I'll do that. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Bob, I would point out as it comes to sharing, it appears that at the intersection of Highway 29 and 1-75 that there are in fact three towers out there that -- that perhaps are, you know, did not fall under the sharing category. ~4R. ~.~LHERE: Are they all on the same location? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: No. They're -- one's south and two is north, I believe, ~f I m recalling. 145{. HULHERE: Yeah, but I think that there's an issue of coverage. Now, I could be mistaken. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: They're -- you know, one's on the -- one's on the northwest MR. i.~LHERE: Okay. We have a map that shows every single tower. in Collier County and, you know, like I said, I'll be happy to bring in Bryan. He can discuss every -- every relationship and why maybe one didn't share versus another one. I mean, he's got all that information. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: And they may have been -- they may have been constructed before the sharing requirement although -- MR. 14ULHERE: That, too, is possible. COI.E4ISSiONER PRIDDY: -- although they've -- at least one of those has been built I'm going to say in the last five years. ~4R. ~4ULHERE: Okay. Well, we can bring back some responses to that. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Maybe -- and I think maybe Mr. Milk might do that the next time there's a petition for a tower because I just pity the poor person that has to be the one that applies for that tower. But at least we'll have that discussion not that I hear a lot of re&~ deep concerns up here but it's more, I think, a situation on type of ' standing and -- MR. ~,~LHERE: Yeah. CO~4ISSIONER YORK: It's just curiosity as far as I'm concerned.:i CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Exactly. Any other questions or comments for staff? Mr. Nelson. COI~4ISSIONER NELSON: Just one quick one. You had indicated that there's some changes of the conservation areas in this as well that I -- are they significant? MR. NINO: Oh, the -- I'm sorry. The Master Plan redefines the conservation areas. It doesn't reduce them at all. It simply Page 32 November 6, 1997 reflects the greater accuracy that we have in terms of their location at this stage in the permitting process. Thank you for reminding me of that. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. Good. Mr. Bruet. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Does the -- is the staff aware of the FDOT, FAA approved sites also for these? But this is only 170 feet tall. Maybe it doesn't fall in that criteria. MR. NINO: According ~o Bryan, if you're below 185 feet, there's a whole different -- you know, there's not the same -- COFfMISSIONER BRUET: Okay. That's my question. MR. NINO: -- requirements. CO~4ISSIONER BRUET: That's my question. Okay. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Does the petitioner have anything to add? And bearing in mind that we were not beating you up. We were just kind of on a fact-finding mission. MS. BISHOP: Of course. Karen Bishop for the petitioner. And less is more. So, i have nothing to add especially about the tower. I can assure you that Pelican Strand, the level of design aesthetics that we have going on there and the amount of money that we're putting into that project, i doubt you'll see a conglomerate of towers hanging out in that intersection. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: i think that's a fair assumption. Questions of the petitioner? Mr. Nelson. COMMISSIONER NELSON: Do they have any plans to build more than one though? MS. BISHOP: No. COFLMISSIONER NELSON: Okay. MS. BISHOP: Absolutely not. CHAI~43~N DAVIS: Okay. Thank you, Miss Bishop. Anyone else to speak on this petition today? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. I'll close the public hearing. Motion? COM/4ISSIONER YORK: Mr. Chairman, I would move that we forward PUD-96-11(2) t~ the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation for approval. COmmISSIONER PEDONE: Second. COM>~ISSIONER BRUET: Mr. Chairman, I'd like to add that the term one be added to that? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: There was a motion of approval -- a recommendation of approval by Mr. York, seconded by Mr. Pedone, and Mr. Bruet is requesting that there be a restriction of one added. COFS~ISSIONER BRUET: We've spent time here debating the issue and trying to understand the pluses and minuses. It seemed like that's a perfect ~iming. COMMISSIONER YORK: I think the Land Development Code aptly protects us. I would not want to put that stipulation in my motion. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any further discussion? (No response.) Page 33 16G 1' November 6, 1997 CHAIP~tAN DAVIS: All those in -- yeah. COI~4ISSIONER NELSON: I just would like to clarify why that would bother the motion to have one in -- COMMISSIONER YORK: Well, at some point in the future, there m~F be a requirement or a need to alter, change, put something else up there and, you know, it doesn't concern me. I think that Land Development Code amply takes care of it and if it's zoned to have a tower, it's zoned to have a tower. CHAirMAN DAVIS: It strikes me, too, that it's not a restriction we put on them in the past that I'm aware of, and it would seem -- it would seem unfair to me to put that on this particular petitioner as well. MIR. NINO: But remember -- excuse me. Remember, we're dealing with basically that type of tower that's a monopole because it's less than 185 feet so, you know, that -- terms -- terms of the possibility, of two of them going in that area given the fact that they're monopoles, you know, i -- i -- I know FDOT likes standards at the interchanges that are that high. CO~4ISSIONER PRIDDY: They're 200 feet. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Does this -- is this any limit? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: It doesn't look any different. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Excuse me. Ron, does this set a limit on to height that we're approving? - M~. NINO: Yes. One hundred seventy feet is the maximum. COMMISSIONER BRUET: I can live with that. I'll withdraw. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any other discussion? (No response.) CHAI~4AN DAVIS: All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIR>LAN DAVIS: It carries unanimously. That brings us to Item CU-97-23. It appears there's a fairly large group that's been waiting very patiently to talk to us. I'd ask all those present that are going to testify on this petition to please stand and raise your right hands so that you may be sworn by the petitioner -- or by the -- excuse me -- by the court reporter. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: You-all have sat here all this time but you don't think you want to say anything. Thank you. We appreciate that~ Mr. Nino. M~. NINO: Ron Nino, for the record. Petition CU-97-23 asks you to recommend to the Board of County Commission -- to the Board of Zoning Appeals that conditional use for a church in the estates area be approved. This property is located on 22nd Avenue Northwest just off of Oaks Boulevard, south of Immokalee Road on the -- as the maps in your report indicate, there are several residences along Oaks Boulevard, a couple residences on 24th Avenue and there are a couple of residences opposite the -- the proposed site on -- again, on 22nd Avenue Northwest. Page 34 November 60 1997 You probably all know that there is a church on Immokalee Road; in other words, there's one lot separating this site from a church that is currently under construction. I don't think it's completed yet on i~okalee Road. And this property is immediately contiguous to the activity center located on the Southeast quadrant of Immokalee Road and 1-75. I emphasize that because that is one of the keys. That is the key that makes this application possible. The provisions -- provisions in the Land Development Code for the Golden Gate area, the estates, Golden Gate Estates Master Plan says that conditional uses may be approved where the property is contiguous to commercially zoned or commercially improved property. So, we have the element that makes this petition technically consistent with the future land use element. As you know, conditional uses, we need to have a preponderance of findings for conditional uses and that -- and the criteria for evaluating that finding is spelled out in the Land Development Code. In the opinion of -- in our opinion, the criteria that we've evaluated, we've concluded that -- that there -- there is a ?reponderance of evidence to support the granting of the conditional use. In terms of consistency with other elements of the Growth Management Plan, the major consistency, we need to find in addition %o consistency with the future land use element, which we've already indicated there is consistency, is the traffic circulation element. Approval of this church will not result in exceeding the threshold that is required to -- for rezoning actions or conditional use actions. That threshold is that we won't exceed five percent of level of Service C traffic on Oaks Boulevard or other streets within the radius of development influence and that those streets will not b~ -- will not be denigraned as a result of this development to a level of service below LOS D. Neither of those two conditions will result with the development of this church. So, we have -- indeed have a -- we can report to you that this -- that this petition, if approved, would be consistent with applicable elements of the Growth Management Plan and the Golden Gate Area Master Plan. The -- the criteria that we have to evaluate for consistency gets us to the issue of public safety and compatibility. This church has several residences around it. We -- we do not find that the fact that a church is near residences is in itself an issue of compatibility or represents an incompatibility. You know, traditionally -- traditionally, and the fact -- the fact that the church is a conditional use is in itself a conditional use in itself is a statement that says but for certain characteristics of the conditional use, it is compatible with the underlying district in which it's -- in which the conditional use is provided. So, when we have a conditional use, we have a much broader test of the compatibility criteria because conditional uses are basically compatible. However, they have certain operating characteristics that we can mitigate against to enhance the measurement of compatibility. Page 35 16G 1 November 6, 1997 And we think that the stipulations that we have introduced to the resolution of adoption address those mitigation requirements which would enhance the measurement of compatibility. However, as you kno~, with petitions of this nature, it depends upon how loud are the opposition. And that in this case, I can tell you, that we have received no:. letters in opposition or in support. So, the testimony that comes forth will have to address that relationship of this conditional use. We -- we recommend approving the conditional use with the conditions that we've outlined in the resolution of adoption. I would have you appreciate that they -- they address the usual concerns that when -- when this church functions~at night and cars enter and exit : the site, that the neighbors aren't going to see headlights. We've made adequate provision for a hundred percent opacity rating on contiguous, residential -- residentially developed lots and -- or adjacent lots. We -- there -- I would -- you probably should appreciate there's currently a masonry wall along 22nd Street. I was surprised to see that wall. You don't often see a wall next to vacant property, but it's a rather handsome wall and certainly will -- will shield any of the parking lot effects that will result from implementation of that site plan that I handed out to you. And, of course, the development is subject to site development- plan approval and is subject to the landscaping requirements of the Land Development Code. We've exercised our concern over the standards of the heights of light standards and I think you'll note that we've required that no light standard will exceed a height of 14 -- 16 feet and that the shielding apparatus on that light will be directed straight down. There will be no spillover. We think we have -- we have provided ample mitigation standards that would ensure that this church, when developed, will be harmonious with its environment. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Mr. Nino, there's an additional church just south of the site -- MR. NINO: Correct. There is. CHAIR/MAN DAVIS: -- on Oaks. MR. NINO: About a half a mile, I'd say. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Right. Doesn't -- it's not just observation, i~ Isn't it -- wouldn't iu be a fair statement that between the residential lots to tile east of this project, this project, if ~ approved, becomes a pretty nice transition to what will probably be ~ multifami!y west of it? ii~ MIR. NINO: That's a very good point. Yes, definitely, i -- I can't imagine a single family housing project going in between the back end of the estates and the freeway. And as a matter of fact, you may recall the Zurich Lake Villas just down the road. That's a multifamily product. Certainly, that will be a multifamily product. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: It just seems to me that in the greater scheme of things that that all seems to fit. Page 36 November 6, 1997 Oaks Boulevard, I know when we recently reviewed a multifamily residential project that it would be a little bit south of this. There were concerns about the level of se~;ice on Oaks which technically, as you've pointed out, meets -- meets the criteria and' there was something that by some development like this it may accelerate some improvements to that road that will help everyone in the area, having traveled it fairly frequently, it's -- there's a lot of congestion. MR. NINO: Yes. Well, as you know, Oaks Boulevard is one of odr major streets. It's on a major street system. We wouldn't be standing before you recommending approval of a church of a conditional use unless it had that relationship. San Marcos is a good example where we didn't recommend it because it was a local street CHAI~Z32; DAVIS: In one mass just recently, 70 parking tickets! were given out? Mr. Priddy. CO~4ISSiONER PRiDDY: Mr. Mulhere, at your earliest convenience when you're back at the office, would you have a talk with staff about their compensation ~ _ ~s not based on the number of words that they speak before %he Planning Commission? CHAi~Z£~ DAVIS: Mr. Priddy, Mr. Nino did a very thorough job %or us and has probably left less for the petitioner's representative to do. CO~4ISSIONER PRIDDY: Hadn't left a thing. CHAiRMA2~ DAVIS: Any questions of staff? COM/4ISSIONER WP_AGE: Well, I was sitting here going through all of that and, I guess, through all of the eloquent presentation, that Mr. Nino is for this project. Is that right? I'm glad that's clarified. CHAI~43~N DAVIS: Mr. York. COPIMISSIONER YORK: I just have a comment. One of the concerns that I have, whenever we get into these conditional use for a church in a residential -- residentially zoned areas that, you know, having the church and a place to worship is one thing, but time and time again, we see that that happens. You find ia church in a residential area and before you know it, they're applying for day care, they're applying for a school, they're applying for a ~3ymnasium and i~ winds up violating the integrity of the residentiai~ area. That's one -- that's one of the major concerns that I have is -- I don't have a problem with a church. I go -- I go myself once in awhile. But if there was some limitation on -- on expansion in this! area of conditional use, I'd feel a lot more comfortable about it. CO~4ISSIONER PRIDDY: But, Mr. York, doesn't it make a lot of sense perhaps to have a day care at that facility so that those folks fk~n~t have to get out on the highways to go somewhere else? I mean, that's the other advantage of -- of having multi-use of a facility like a church is that perhaps some of those folks that live in that neighborhood can stay in that neighborhood with some of those services like day care. Page 37 16G ] November 6, 1997 MR. :;INO: May I clarify? COM~ISSIONER YORK: Please, may I respond? CHAIRPUtN DAVIS: Yeah. MR. NINO: The first map you had showed something -- ~ bei£e~e showed a day care faciiit~,. That's not a part of this application and the amended map shows that as a social building or the fellowship hall. That was -- that was incorrectly noted. We're -- we're only dealing with a church here. COM]4ISSIONER YORK: And if there were additional -- ~[R. NINO: And, of course, they have the right to come back later on, as Commissioner York points out, and apply for a day care center and a school but we have to deal with that at that time. COPtMISSIONER YORK: But the thing that I'm trying to point out is that this is my second term on this Planning Commission and time and time again, we've had churches come in, after they've received conditional use, come back in and want to expand their facilities there and we've had this room crowded with people that are against it. And I -- COM/~ISSiONER OATES: And we did in fact turn the one down. I don't know what ever happened in the County Commission. We in fact did turn the one down on Rattlesnake Hammock -- I mean County Barn. CHAIR/Z_AN DAVIS: Yes. And I think that's just the point, that we have to focus on what's before us today, which is just the church. And I agree with you, Mr. York. There are additional uses there. Maybe they're appropriate in the future, maybe they aren't, and our LDC provides for a public process they have to go through to -- for there -- it to be determined whether or not they're appropriate· COVL~ISSIONER YORK: Well, you know, the petition states -- the petition on -- on face says that it's for a church, but then you read within it, it says the church and related activities, you know· And' those related activities are what I get concerned with. CHAIRFu~N DAVIS: Well, tell us -- tell us what related activities are. MR. NINO: Related activities are fellowship halls, meeting rooms, church offices. CHAIR/ViAN DAVIS: It's not a gymnasium -- M2R. NINO: It's not a -- no. CHAIRMAlq DAVIS: -- or day care or a school. M~. NINO: It's not a school or a day care. CHAIRPLA/~ DAVIS: Okay. Auny other questions or comments? The petitioner, Mr. Purse. ~.~R PURSE: For the record, my name is Jeff Purse representing Faith Community Church. I'm just here to answer any questions that you might have. I do have an aerial up there I put up that you can refer to. CHAIRMAiN DAVIS: And the request we have before us today is forI the church and fellowship hall as Mr. Nino pointed out? MR. PURSE: Yes, sir. CHAIR_MAN DAVIS: Any questions of the petitioners? COM/4ISSIONER YORK: Are there plans for expansion at some time in the future? Are there plans in the future for day care or a Page 38 16G 1 November 6, 1997 gymnasium? I&R. PURSE: I would say that the furthest that the church would go would be to a day care based on the amount of petitioners that they have now, parishioners they have now. And it -- you know, ~here are no plans to go beyond that. CHAIRblAN DAVIS: Have you any other questions? (No response.) CHAIP/4Alq DAVIS: Is there anyone else here today that would like to speak on this petition? (No response.) CHAI~Z3kN DAVIS: ~at an orderly group of people. COMMISSIONER OATES: They're all God-fearing people, that's why. CHAI~43uN DAVIS: with that, I'll close the public hearing. COb~ISSIONER BUDD: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRbIAN DAVIS: Mr. Budd? COI~4ISSIONER BUDD: i'd like to make a motion to approve or to recommend approval of Petition CU-97-23. C01~ISSIONER BRUET: Second. CHAIR/ViAN DAVIS: A motion for recommendation of approval by Mr. Budd, seconded by Mr. Bruet. Discussion? (No response.) ,i, CHAIRMAN DAVIS: All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAI~4JdN DAVIS: Carries unanimously, CO~4ISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, I move that we continue Petition CP-97-4 to November the 20th. CO~.E4ISSIONER BUDD: Second. CHAI~u~2J DAVIS: A motion by Mr. Oates, seconded by Mr. Budd. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Carries -- I'm sorry. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMSLN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. ~ Which brings us to old business, Mr. Mulhere, which I remember you had something you wanted to talk about. I just don't remember what it was. MR. MULHERE: Well, actually a couple of things. I have -- I believe that Marie mailed to you a -- a Planning Commission member list. CHAIR/YuAN DAVIS: Yes, sir. MR. MIJLHERE: I have an even more revised one than that that also reflects the chairman, vice-chairman, secretary positions as well, so I'll hand that out. COM}4ISSIONER YORK: COM/4ISSIONER PEDONE: COMMISSIONER OATES: COP[MISSIONER YORK: COP[MISSIONER PEDONE: I also have a fax number. So do I. You can revise that again. 649-1411. 775-1158. MR. MULHERE: Five eight? COM~4ISSIONER PEDONE: Yeah. Page 39 ~ November 6, 1997 ~. MULHERE: Okay. Well, I'll go ahead and get those added and then handed out the next time. I also have -- we've recently had a couple of new members on the EAB or appointed to the EAB and so i -- I asked David Weigel for copies of his memorandum that he put out in 1995 regarding Government~ in the Sunshine and the statutes and I thought you might like to have a copy of that redistributed. I don't know if you all kept -- COMMISSIONER BRUET: Sure. CHAIR_MAN DAVIS: Yes, we would. You may remember that Miss Student and I discussed at some point in time a presentation to this . board about these issues. And in talking with both she and our County Attorney, Mr. Weigel, I thought that this probably would suffice for now and if we have some questions, we can always direct them at Miss Student's office. And they're always -- if we have a concern about a voting conflict or something, I know they're always very receptive to getting that info~-mation for us as quickly as possible. MS. STUDENT: Yeah, we'd like to have about a week's lead time on that because if it's anything unusual, it has to be researched and we may even have to call Tallahassee and we do need lead time to be able to do that so -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: ~]d I think this board, if we kind of err on the side of conservatism, if we've got a question, we go ahead and recuse. ourselves rather than run that risk, which I think is a good attitude'. COmmISSIONER PRIDDY: Keep in mind if we get these packages lesS~ than a week ahead of time and don't know most of the time -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah, that's the dilemma. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: -- in -- far in advance. MS. STUDENT: Well, we do the best we can. COMMISSIONER OATES: We get them on Friday or Saturday generally. MR. MULHERE: What I just handed out is the draft -- a staff report, which contains draft amendments for this cycle of the LDC. It's not a very lengthy list of amendments although it said 30, 40 pages but a lot of that is pretty minor. However, much to my chagrin, it's not quite as uncontentious as I would have hoped. There are some issues on there that probably will require some discussion at our meeting on the 13th -- at your meeting on the 13th, one of which is dealing with the -- the requirement that landscape plans for multifamily and Commercial Site Development Plan -- Plan B, signed and sealed by a landscape architect, there's an individual who's challenging that and so, there will be, I'm sure, some discussion on both sides of that issue. There are some other minor issues as you get into reading those that -- that there also will be some discussion. There's an amendment proposed by the Airport Authority to require abrogation easements and! I've just completed a -- a -- a presentation in front of Development Services Advisory Conunittee and they have made some recommendations regarding these amendments which are not reflected in that packet, which I will hopefully get to prior to your meeting on the 13th, so may have a couple of handouts on some of these amendments reflecting development services by the committee recommendations. Page 40 November 6, 1997 There are some changes. And -- and I'll go ahead -- I'm sure I can get that done before your meeting so I can hand those out to you, but I apologize for not being able to get it any sooner but the timing is such that I'll have to do it this week. And Miss Student has done only one preliminary review of these, and once I complete the recommended changes from the Development ~ Services Advisory Committee, I'll provide another copy to Miss Student for review. We have two meetings and some -- several times to address the ~ issues. MS. STUDENT: Yeah, and how it typically works is between meeting one and meeting two, if some new issues come up or anything needs to be cleaned up in the ordinance, that gives us the time to do it, so -- CHAIrmAN DAVIS: And that first meeting being a week from tonight on the 13th at 5:05 p.m. and the second one on the 25th? FS{. MI3LHERE: %,~ich is a Tuesday. CHAIPd~3~N DAVIS: At -- Tuesday at 5:05, with the hope being as we often find most of the issues are cleared up at the first meeting. Then we can kind of see what's there for the second meeting because there are some that have to come quite a distance and we -- we can just see it -- very often that second meeting is a very brief one. CO~MISSIONER OATES: Bear in mind that I will not be around for the 25th meeting. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Somehow, Mr. Oates, we'll suffer through. COM!~ISSI©NER OATES: No, I don't know. I didn't mean it that way. You were talking about some people coming from distant lands and just -- that I won't be here. CHAIRPIAN DAVIS: Actually, I was referring to Immokalee. COF~4ISSiONER PRIDDY: The thought also crossed my mind that if -- that if I'm continued to be treated harshly, there is an individual in Immokalee that is chomping at the bits to come back. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Say no more. Say no more. CHAIR/VLAN DAVIS: Was there something -- COMMISSIONER OATES: Also we love you. ~R. ~ULHERE: Oh, yes. There was one -- one last discussion and that was the -- the board's pleasure with regard to when -- how we're going to deal with the fact that the first Thursday in January is a holiday, is January 1st. ~, COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: We only have one meeting in January. ~ MR. MTJLHERE: And that's one option. The only reason I say -- COMMISSIONER OATES: i agree with that. CHAIR/W3d~ DAVIS: Well, but what -- what's the level of petitions? I~R. MULHERE: Very high. . CHAIRMTUN DAVIS: See, that's the dilemma. MR. MULHERE: It's very high. I mean, it's up to you. Certainly, I -- you know, we could put -- we had quite a few petitions on the agenda today. You never know which one might take an awfully long time but, on the other hand, we could load up the second meeting recognizing that if -- you'll be able to stay if it takes, you know, some longer time period to review them. I mean -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah Page 41 November 6, 1997 MR. MULHERE: -- it's certainly -- COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: 14r. Chairman? MS. STUDENT: Just a point of observation, I would think that ~e usually -- well, maybe not that far in advance, but it seems that have a pretty good read of what ones could be contentious because I forget how many we had today. We had quite a number and it did go rapidly. MIR. MI3LHERE: By I think my point is, is that, you know, that the -- that there's a significant number of petitions in by -- unless we do them on that second meeting, they end up losing a month in the process. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah. MR. MULHERE: But I think we can put, you know, 16 or 18 or 20 petitions on for that second meeting and still -- you know, today's an example of having ten on there and last week the same -- or two weeks ago, the same thing, so -- COZ&MISSIONER PRIDDY: I~r. Chairman, I'd like to recommend that we, in fact, only have one meeting and that we plan our day to -- to maybe be here until five o'clock and unless, you know, if we don't waste a day or donate a day, let's donate all the day, if it takes that, and get it over with. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: is everybody agreed? Mr. Nelson. COMiMISSIONER NELSON: Well, it's just that -- I guess I support what Bob said, that if it's already sort of busy, Marco Island's first council, is going to meet next Tuesday, and correct me if I'm wrong, couldn't they push everything that's on hold back in front of us? MR. MULHERE: They can. I don't think it will happen that quickly. I'm only guessing. I think, you know, that they have -- they have to -- first, I think they have to either hire or contract with an attorney. MS. STUDENT: Yeah. I can't represent-- it would be the City of Marco's attorney and the county's obviously, and I'm employed by the Board of County Commissioners. So, they'd have to get an attorney. I would think also they'd have to do an interlocal agreement with the county and that would take some time before -- I don't think it could be accomplished by January, q~ite frankly. MR. MULHERE: But, certainly, there is a good likelihood that -- and, of course, the other thing that we don't know is whether the council will, in the interim or until they have their own planning board, remand those petitions back to you prior to going to the council or whether they'].! go directly to the council. And I -- I wouldn't want to surmise. But I do agree that, you know, at some point probably just past January or just'-- you know, ft -- the timing is a little conspicuous with regard to that. But there's only about, right now, I think eight petitions. I~IS. STUDENT: The other thing and, again, I'm not quite sure about this, but I think what they would need to do would be to establish a time to have the meetings and it couldn't be interspersed with the county business. It might be doable to have the county business dealt with first Page 42 November 6, 1997 and then I do think they'd have to establish a time though to have the Planning Commission meet on their items and not just say, well, when the county stuff is done, because you don't want to intermingle this. And because of the length of time involved and difficulty predicting, I don't know if they might need to set up even another day and so forth, and -- because their things would likely be not as voluminous as the county's. They might just require one meeting a month or one every two months or something like that, and that would be up to them to decide. We would have to be careful that it's not in any way comingled or intermingled with the county's business. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Mr. York. CO~4ISSIONER YORK: Miss Student, wouldn't -- inasmuch as this board is an advisory board to the Board of County Commissioners, would that not have to be negotiated through the board rather than through US? MS. STUDENT: It would be through an interlocal agreement -- CO~4ISSiONER YORK: Okay. That's going to take some -- MS. STUDENT: -- between -- before our board. CO~4ISSIONER YORK: -- a lot of time. MS. STUDENT: And, yes, it would. COMMISSIONER YORK: So, I think that kind of dissipates your concerns. CO~&MISSIONER NELSON: Yeah. In that case, I could support one more meeting, yeah. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah. I think -- is there any objection up here to canceling the meeting on January 1st with the idea that we will probably have a fairly lengthy meeting on January 157 COM~4ISSIONER OATES: No. It's fine with me. CHAIRMA~N DAVIS: That seems to be fine. By the sa3ne token, advertising-wise, we probably have some sort of drop dead date that -- you know, if that looks like that's going to be a major problem, you can alert us maybe next meeting. MR. MULHERE: Yeah. ?~d I don't think it is. As I said, there -- I know there are a lot of petitions. I know that the activity is e×tremeiy heavy, but off the top of my head right here, I can't really think of anything that's over the controversy that might take four or five or six hours which otherwise would preclude us from putting a lot of other petitions on the agenda. You know, I think a lot of them are fairly standard petitions. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Because we went through quite a few in two hourS today. COZ&MISSIONER YORK: As far as your business goes on January the ltth, color yourself gone. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I think that's the case. Anything else? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Leave Immokalee before dark and we get back after dark. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: With that, we'll adjourn the meeting. Thank you very much. There being no further business for the good of the County, the Page 43 November 6, 1997 meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 10:30 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MICHAEL A. DAVIS, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC. BY: ROSE M. WITT, RPR Page 44 November 13, 1997 TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION Naples, Florida, November 13, 1997 LET IT BE R~ERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 5:05 p.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: ALSO PRESENT: CHAIRMAN: Michael A. Davis Russell Priddy Richard Nelson Michael J. Bruet Donald J. York Edward J. Oates Michael Pedone Gary Wrage Marjorie M. Student, Assistant County Attorney Robert Mulhere, Current Planning Manager Page 1 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL lkIEET AT 5:05 P.M., THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 13, 1997 IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMI2qlSTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE:ANY PERSON WHO DECIDED TO APPEAL A DECISION OF TillS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. THESE MATER/ALS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. 1. ROLL CALL BY CLERK 2. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MF/'a. JTES: 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES: 5. BCC REPORT 6. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. July 1997 Cycle LDC Amendments 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NEW BUSINESS I0. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 11. ADJOURN 11/13/97 CCPC AGENDAJmd 1 16G ,1 November 13, 1997 Call this meeting of the Collier County Planning Mr. Priddy~ Page 2 CHAIPi~AN DAVIS: Commission to order, and we begin by calling the roll. ~R. PRIDDY: Here. CHAI.R/VL~N DAVIS: Mr. Budd is excused. Mr. Nelson. MR. NELSON: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Bruet. ~R. BRUET: Present. CHAIRPgAN DAVIS: Mr. Davis, here. Mr. York. P[R. YORK: Here. CHAIRI~JLN DAVIS: Mr. Oates. ~R. OATES: Here. CHAIR/W_AN DAVIS: Mr. Pedone. ~R. PEDONE: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: And Mr. Wrage. ~R. WRAGE: Here. CHAIR}~Aiq DAVIS: Any addenda to the agenda? I think everybody at the last meeting received from the County Attorney's Office the information on the Sunshine Law, which everybody hopefully has had time to read. And we're going to be also receiving some information shortly on gifts. ~4S. STUDENT: >~r. Weigel has prepared the one that you received and also, i believe he's working on one on the gift law. And mayb,~ if there are any questions, we can either handle it case by case, or schedule a time when we could have Mr. Weigel present also to give,.ia little presentation on that. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Probably after we get the second one on the gifts and everybody has a chance to read it, we'll just see. The Sunshine Law, I thought, was real straightforward and easy to understand. So, a good reminder, and good education for us. MR. YORK: I read it. ~S. STUDENT: ! can't stress enough, though, if there is any questions, to please call our office and we'll research it for you. CHAIPd. LAN DAVIS: We certainly shall. This being our LDC evening, the first evening public hearing of the proposed LDC amendments, and Mr. ~ulhere, we've had this for a while and had the opportunity to read it. And it strikes me that we might be able to jus: go through and maybe touch each subject, and as we name a subject, &f we've got questions, we certain~y have the ability to ask those. And if there, on that particular subject, are people from the~ audience that want to address it, we can do so at that time. ~42q. MULHERE: Yes, and there are a couple of proposed amendments that have undergone a few changes since the packet was sent out, and I have copies of those for distribution, and I'll briefly ex/plain those to you, as well. CHAIR/~_AN DAVIS: Okay, okay. Ms. Student, what witnesses do we need to swear? ~IS. STUDENT: We don't need to swear anybody, because this is legislative, it's not quasi-judicial. CHAIR/VLAN DAVIS: Great. Thank you. Okay? November 13, 1997 ~4R. ~4ULHERE: Again for the record, Bob Mulhere, Current Planning Manager. This is, as you stated, the first of two evening hearings required by the Land Development Code. I do want to put on the pubiic record -- obviously, it will be advertised properly -- but I want to put on the public record that the second meeting, which is scheduled for November 25th, which is a Tuesday, because of the Thanksgiving holiday, will be held in this room. Originally, we had talked about a possible conflict with the Board and we were going to possibly hold! that in the Supervisor of Elections office. That will be here. Pending the outcome of today's hearing, I will tomorrow prepare a new staff report for you that reflects any changes that occur this evening, and then get that to you as quickly as possible during the week, the coming week. The two -- just for the public record, the two board hearings,~.~ BCC hearings on the amendments are also to be scheduled to be held 'in this room, and those are scheduled for December the 2nd, which is a!~ Tuesday, and then Wednesday, December !7th, 5:05. The first amendment in your package -- all of these amendments have sort of a cover page which gives a brief eT~planation of the amendment and the genesis of it. The first amendment has undergone a few changes and I'll hand this out to you. MR. OATES: You didn't tinker with this report, did you? MR. MULHERE: No. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: This replaces what we have, Bob? MR. ~4ULHERE: That's correct. This amendment is intended to clarify the Section 1.6 interpretations. Over the years, we've, the staff has recognized and the Board has recognized some lack of clarity in that section with regard to who had standing, what exactly was in effect for an aggrieved party or property owner. And this is intended to clarify that process. The change in the package that I just handed you versus the one that you already had, was on page 4, Section 1.6.6, the first paragraph under 1.6.6. We've gone in and borrowed from the statutes to define for our own purposes what an affected property owner is; and that is one within 300 feet of the property which is the subject of the interpretation, and who would be notified, because we are required to notify those property owners. ' Then beyond that, we also have defined what an aggrieved or affected party might be, and that merely reflects or mirrors the statutes. Now, Ms. Student had one concern in this definition, and I want to put that on the record, that she felt it was not necessary for uS to go, to include the phrase, "or local government" when defining an affected party for our purposes of an interpretation. MS. STUDENT: Yes, I think that that could cause us some difficulty. The other thing that I would mention is I don't think we necessarily need to have the reference to the Florida Statutes 163.32.15.2. That's provided for in there, and that's appropriate. Page 3 November 13, 1997 But I think we can just say that the alleged adverse interest may be shared in common, et cetera, because %hat really is written pursuant to case law. So I don't think we need that statutory reference. MR. ~.~LHERE: I want to acknowledge %hat this amendment has been reviewed by and, in fact, the direction of the Development Services Advisory Committee was in support of this amendment. But they also wanted to see a better definition of an aggrieved or affected part~ and property owner. I want to acknowledge the help of Mr. Anderson in arriving at this definition. He hasn't had a chance to look at it so he may ~ot like it. ' CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Well, his outfit's a little flashy tonight, anyway so -- MR. MULHERE: That really is the only change that we made between the package that we handed out to you and tonight's package on that particular amendment. Unless there is someone from the public that wishes to speak, i'll move on to the next one. CHAI~LAN DAVIS: Any questions or anyone from the public that' would like to speak on this amendment? (No response.) CHAI~43~N DAVIS: Okay, please proceed. MR. MULHERE: The next one is very brief, very minor. As you~: know, we use SIC Code to include permitted uses, the C-1 district allows all types of professional offices. An oversight was that we didn't include offices for landscape architects because they fall~ under a dif= ~ =e_ent major group in the SIC Code. They fall in the agricultural group, and so we have allowed them in the C-1 district. By interprenation, %his simply will reflect that they are permitted CHAI~43uN DAVIS: Okay. ' MR. BRUET: Bob, is there any plan to review the SIC Codes and their appropriateness to the county and Naples? MR. MULHERE: Well, i'm getting a feeling that that direction might be fcr~hcoming sometime in the near future. MR. BRUET: There are some crazy uses there. CHAIP24AN DAVIS: Mr. Nelson, I think, brought up at our last meeting when there aren't that many uses, that sometimes it's easier just to tell us what they are. On the other hand, having the booklet home and looking them up sometimes, some of them are -- there's a lot of them listed. MR. MULHERE: I think the SIC Code -- and we'll go off the subject just briefly -- I think it's got good -- there are good reasons for using it, and then again, there are some problems, and some of the problems are it's not easy for people to understand what those numbers mean, unless they have the resource right there. On the other hand, the federal government updates that book every 10 years and it's due to be updated this year, 1997. So we were waiting to get a copy of the updated book before we made any determination as to which way to go with it. And it should be any time, now. Page 4 November 13, 1997 The next amendment starts on page 7. And this is an amendmenti~!ito just clarify some, again, SIC Code inconsistencies. This particular one calls for ~he deletion of SIC Code 7261, funeral service and crematories, from the C-1 district which they re identified as a conditional use in the C-1 district, and they are permitted use in ,the C-4 district. And obviously, we do not think that they are appropriate in the C-1 district, which is a professional office .? district. On page 10, again we have some redundancies. This amendment would be to delete certain personal service uses; photo studio, beaUty shop, barber shop, shoe shine repair -- we don't have a lot of call for that. Those are personal services and they are permitted uses in the C-4 and -- they are listed as permitted uses in the C-4 district, but they are also identified in the C-2 district, and by right, then they would be permitted in the C-4 district. So it's just some housekeeping there. ,,~ On page 14, this is an amendment -- over the years, we've had several people indicate that there was some confusion over exactly what a secondhand suore is versus a pawn shop. And again, includedl: in the SIC Code definition is with secondhand stores, are antique shopS. And the staff over the years has felt that an antique shop in itself is not an undesirable use in the retail district, in the C-3 district. And so this amendment would allow antique shops. It would also define antique shops or stores, pawn shops, and used merchandise stores. And it would allow antique shops as a permitted use in the C-3, but also prchibit the other ty~es of uses that we do not think are appropriate and that historically we have not permitted in that district. And antique stores are considerably different. Generally, it's a little bit more valuable type merchandise and collectibles and historic types of stuff. And I think an example, not in the county but 5th Avenue, there are several antique stores and obviously, they function pretty well down there. CHAIR~L~N DAVIS: Yes, we're starting to see a few there, Sandpiper Plaza, 'where Davis and 41 split. Mr. Mulhere, is there anything in the code that prevents a commercial business, say in C-4, from putting a chain link fence over their windows and f/ont doors? MR. ~4/3LH..RE: Well, there probably is in one sense, and that would require an interpretation. That would be whether or not Itl: something tike that is acceptable according to our architectural standards, it is not expressly dealt with. It is something that we do intend to deal with in this next cycle and we will be bringing back amendments to the architectural standards to prohibit the use of chain link fences. Whether or not it's supported, we're intending to look into that on the major collectors or arterials within the front yard. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: It's just an observation, that I begin to see some hints of Miami. ~fR. MULHERE: Yes. On page 16, I do have a handout for this one, Page 5 16G 1 November 13, 1997 as well. By the way, John Drury, the executive director of the Collier County Airport Authority is here, had some telephone conversation with Mr. George Varnadoe who had some concerns with this amendment and I have a few things I'd like to let you know relative to the SIC discussion on this, and then I'm sure John may have something to add. CHAI~4A2~ DAVIS: Okay. ~4R. 14ULHERE: The Development Services Advisory Committee, in: reviewing this amendment, which, for the most part, simply reflects current federal statutes with regard to -- and I'm not going to get into a great deal of detail because I think Mr. Drury can handle it a whole lot better than I can. But I do want to let you know that the Development Services Advisor/ Committee recommended approval except on page !9-A of the~' handout I just gave you, the last page. They recommended that that paragraph be stricken in its entirety. That paragraph, as written, would require a property owner, when applying for a zoning action or a building perm..it, to acquiesce to a navigation easement over the property, if it falls within the maps. And the objection cf the Development Services Adviso~t Committee was that this is already happening Qhen we go through a zoning petition, a PUD amendment or a zcning action or some ccnditionai use, and that it would be an onus cna property o'~ner to have to acTuiesce to that, when a zoning is in place, something such as a building permit. ~. 'fORK: Di~c't we do that with Fiddler's Creek? ~<R. :.'ULHERE: Yes, we did. ~.. YORK: Yes. '~ ~4ULHERE: .~nd i ~ ~e.le'.-e there are also navigation easements on the ~.!arco Shores PUD, the high-rise towers. :CR. ?ORK: Yes, right. ~{~ ~.~.LHERE: As I said, i m sure k.. Drury can add some informasicn on that. Rut to my knowledge, there was no objection on the par~ of the Air~ort Authority. This amendment was prepared, sort of a col!aDorati-;e effort between John Drury, Tom Palmer in the County Attorney's office, and Rrian b~ilk. So John, if you have anything to add? ~4R. DRURY: ~;o. Jus~ that the advisory committee has made a recommendation and we have no problem with their recon~nendation you. CF~I~4AA' DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Drury. :4R. ~4ULHERE: I do have a copy of a change or suggested by Mr, Varnadoe, and on -- his recommendation is that in section 2.2 23.212.1 -- I'll t~--y [o find that page. ' ~dlR. OATES: What page? ~4R. [4ULHERE: i've gotta find it. ~4R. OATES: 2.23 what? MIR. YORK: ~wo-three-one. It's page 19, at the bottom. Is that correct, Bob? · ~4R. ~KILHERE: Yes. MR. YORK: Okay. Page 6 16G '1 November 13, 1997 :'~. :.~3LHERE: No, it's on page 17. :'~. gATES: i'm sorry. :~. :.~LHERE: Page 17, under that horizontal zone radius on the chart in the middle of the page -- MR. OATES: Okay. M~,. :CULHERE: -- number one there, it currently reads ""no structure or obstruction will be permitted in the horizontal zone that has a height greater than 150 feet above the airport height." The recommendation is to add the phrase: "Unless a Federal Aviation Administration determination of no hazard to air navigation has been issued." Now, that is something that can happen and it's Mr. Varnadoe's opinion that that should be reflected in the Land Development Code. MR YORK: Does staff have a problem with that? MR MULHERE: Any problem? MR DRURY: No. t4_R MULHERE: No. MR OATES: Thamk you. MR MULHERE: The second one is to add a new section called exemptions. And that is, at this point, a specific exemption for ~he -- and it reads as follows: "The development of the Marco Shores ~olf course community that comports with the locational and height requirements of ordinance 81-6 as amended by ordinance 85-56 and Ordinance 94-41, is exempted from the provisions of Section 2.2.23 ~by virtue of an agreement between Johnson Bay Development Corporation, Collier County Airport Authority, the Board of County Commissioners, effective August 8, 1995." That agreement exists and therefore it's his recommendation that that particular development be exempted from these standards. Then again, he references the prior issuance of a Federal Aviation Administration determination of no hazard to air navigation Any objection to that? ' MR. DRURY: No. MR. ~JLHERE: Okay. So there is no objection, and we will -- MR. YORK: Incorporate these? it. MR. MULHERE: -- with your concurrence, incorporate those into CHAI~43~N DAVIS: That would be our intent, unles~ I hear an objection up here, for all those changes to be incorporated. And is there anyone from the audience to speak on this issue? i~' Seeing none, that's a done deal, Bob. MR. ?~LHERE: Okay. Next, we move to page 20, is a minor amendmen% allowing communication towers, of course, subject provisions in the LDC. Currently, they are allowed in all commerci!al and indus:rial zoning districts, to the We add the reference to business park, because that's a new ~i zoning district, and we did not have that. That's an oversight on ~our part that we didn't add that when we added the business park zoning district to the LDC. Page 21 -- Page 7 16G 1 November 13, 1997 MR. 'fORK: Question. MR. b~LHERE: Yes, sir. I~,. 'fORK: is there a problem there, Bob, with height restrictions or are there height restrictions within those zoning districts? MR. MULHERE: Well, there are,' but the towers have their own separate set of height restrictions. In this case, you know, it talks about being permitted only up to 75 feet. Beyond that, there are other restrictions that would apply. ' MR. OATES: Conditional use after that, isn't it? MR. M/3LHERE: That's correct. By the way, I did talk to Brian:; and if at some point you wish, I can bring him in and we can do a little session on our tower ordinance. I think it would be helpful.~ even 15 or 20 minutes. MR. YORK: But at certain heights there are requirements for flashing light or a strobe? ~.. >~LHERE: Right, aviation, federal requirements. MR. OATES: Could you wait until the 18th of December to do it~ MR. ~ULHERE: Sure. CHAI~tN DAVIS: No. We would want to wait until you're back, Ed. MR. OATES: That's what I mean, I'll be back. CHAIrmAN DAVIS: Okay. Mr. MULHERE: Or January or so. I~.R,. OATES: Whatever. ~R. I~3LHERE: The next amendment on page 21 is, I believe, the one that has caused the attendance here tonight, and I'll give you a litzle history on that. And we're handing out a revised copy of t~ amendments. There are copies of that up here, if anyone in the " audience wants to look at it. The only revision is that -- well, let me give you the history, first. About a year ago, we amended the Collier County Land Development Code ?;hen we did a comprehensive review of our landscap~e section. One of the changes in that was to require that a landscape plan, other than for one and two family, bear -- be prepared by and bear the seal of a landscape architect. It was discussed at the board hearings and was approved. There i:as been ongoing discussion as to exactly Qhat the statu!tes say in this respect, and whether or not we could and should have ai code that required a landscape architect's seal, or whether or not there were some provisions for exemptions within the State statutes. that our ccde does not reflect. And if there are provisions for exceptions, whether or not we could nonetheless be more restrictive!~ And Ms. Student has spent a lot of time and put a lot of effort into reviewing uhese, and I certainly will let Ms. Student speak for herself, but I wanted to give you a little overview. The recommendation, after consideration by the attorney's office, was that we amend, based on a request by a member of the audience who will speak to you, Ray Pelletier, was that we amend the code to strike through the phrase, "be prepared by an," so that it would read: "The Page 8 Ii 16G November 13, 1997 landscape plan shall bear the seal of a landscape architect registered in the State of Florida." This would expressly allow preparation by someone other than a! landscape architect, but would presume that bearing a seal of a landscape architect, that they had some supervisory capacity in the presentation of that plan. That s consistent, according to the County Attorney's Office, ~ with the statutes. The Development Services Advisory Committee reviewed this, and after some discussion, supported the staff's recommendation with the exception that they also ask that we strike through the second reference to the phrase, "be prepared by an," which is at the bottom of page 21 that I just handed out to you. The botitom of that paragraph, there are actually two references, and the DSAC felt that this amendment was more consistent if they were both struck through. And certainly, staff tends to agree with that. Having given you that background, whether or not Ms. Student wants to add something -- MS STUDENT: I'd like to make a general comment, and our office has engaged in extensive review. Last year, when the amendment waSi put forward, there were many amendments, and we weren't asked to review it. And there is case law that is a guide for local government as to what its ordinance may provide for, vis a vis state statutory requirements, and that's the case of Marion County versus McKeever, 436 So2d 299, decided by our Fifth District Court of Appeal in 1983. And that says that an ordinance is inconsistent or conflicts with the general law if the ordinance and the legislative provision cannot coexist. And because we're a noncharter county, our ordinances must be consistent with state law. After reviewing these exemptions -- and there's an exemption for a nurser'/man who prepares a plan or drawing as an adjunct to the marketing of his product, and there are also exemptions for architects and surveyors and engineers, pursuant to the definition of what the practice of architecture and engineering is; and there is also an exemption for people that o,~n their own real or personal property. And in our code, we have a provision for single family/two family mobile homes. So based upon all that, it is the conclusion of ~he County Attorney's Office that the code, prior.to the amendment, can co-exi'St with the state law, because the exemptions that the state law talk about, are quite different from the landscape plan that the county reviews. And I think there will be evidence or a presentation madeiby staff on that point. So that's basically our conclusion. Ms. Siemion will present problems that occurred when anybody and their brother could come in and prepare one of these landscape plans. And I believe she will tell you it caused the county a problem because the plans didn't always meet our code requirements, and it put her in the position -- or whomever the landscape architect was at the time -- of an ethical dilemma of stepping in the shoes of the landscape architect for the Page 9 November 13, 1997 person that brought in the plan. And that would be like somebody coming to our office and askin~ us to file or prepare papers to enable them to sue the Board of County CoMmissioners or the Planning Commission. And i think she will give you more information about those problems. Also, as I stated, there's a difference between a landscape plan as ccntemplated by our code and a plan that is an adjunct to market, lng plant material. Thirdly, we think that our requirement about the single family/two family mobile home property owners, that they are exempt, meets the intent of the exemption in the code for people that own their real property being able to do their own plan. We think it would be a rare case where you would have an industrial piece of property or a commercial piece, or even a multi-family piece, that would be o'~ned by an individual as opposed to a land trust or a ccrporatlcn, in those cases, it's clear to us that they would have to have a landscape architect. But we feel that the Legislature was thinking of this single family property owner especially when it wrote this exemption. And there are some principles of statutory construction that also researched, That if I need to bring up, I will. But basically', the law has to be construed in a manner that is logical and just and reasonable. And, for example, to say that a nurseryman can prepare a landscape plan and not be licensed as a landscape architect, but eve~fbody else has to have a landscape architect prepare the same thing, sort of, i think, flies in the face of logic and reason. But in any event, we'll see what the presentation brings forth and I or staff will address any of the comments. CHAIP~LAN DAVIS: Mr. Bruet, you have a question? :~. BRUET: These discussions are going to be brought on commercial projects only or are we getting into residential, also? Because residential doesn't require -- MS. STUDENT: There are possibly two exemptions in the code that could be at issue tonight, and that is the nurseryman exemption: and the other exemption is ~he case where an o'~ner of a commercial piece of property owns it individually and wants to do their own landscape plan. And we don't think that's what the Legislature meant, because staff is going to tell you about the public health, s~fety and welf~are concerns that go into preparing a landscape plan. There are concerns about what's ralled sight distance triangles, when you do -- are at an ingress and egress point on a commercial piece of property. Ii!' There are a whole host of other concerns concerning types of :ii plansings and their tolerance to hurricanes and high winds, and drainage concerns ~hat you address. And when you are dealing with commercial or industrial property, or even multi-family, that has a broader impact on the public -- and aesthetics could be another one -- than does ~he single family use. And that's why we believe that when the Legislature wrote this, it's written somewhat unartfully, but that's what they meant and what the exemption that we have right in our code already meets this. B~d Page 10 i November 13, 1997 that's why it is our conclusion that our code, as currently written, not even with the amendment, can co-exist with the state law and its' exemptions based on the case that I cited to you. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: ~r. York. ~4R. ~'~LHERE: And I'll answer your question, multi-family the only exemption is for one and two. ' ~R. BRUET: Single family, I should have said, not residential.' code.~4S. STUDENT: Single family mobile home and two-family, in our ~4R. BRUET: Okay. C.W. AI~4AN DAVIS: ~4r. York, you have a question? ~,. YORK: If a person o,~ns a small commercial piece and he wants to landscape it himself, isn't he subject to the landscape code as it now exists7 ~4iR. ~4ULHERE: He's subject to the landscape code and he's re~2ired to get that landscape plan prepared, signed and sealed by landscape architect. I just want to add that, you know, for purposes of full disclosure and providing comprehensive information, I included a of backup in your packet, including a memorandum done, or written by. Nancy Siemion, which basically reflects the comments made by Ms. Student, we really were not prepared to make a presentation here That's on the record with regard to that. ' I'm sure you're going to hear some comments from the public, and if we need to respond, or if you have questions, we'll be happy to. CHAI~43C4 DAVIS: Go ahead, Mr. York. ~4R. YORK: As proposed, these amendments are going to make it a;~ little bit easier for people. ~,. ~3LHERE: Well, that's our version of them. They are certainly the way this amendment is proposed would be a c! ar~~ica~ion. r.[R. YORK: Okay. ~<R. ~493LHERE: And in one sense, a lessening of the stringency of the s~andard, saying that they can be prepared under the supervision by someone else other than a landscape architect. MR. YORK: All they are going to require is somebody can prepare them but they need to be sealed by. MR. ~4ULHERE: Right. CHAIP24AN DAVIS: And from a county staff perspective, the idea of them being sealed is that there is liability on the landscape architect's par[ that it has been done correctly when they seal it? MR. ~493LHERE: That's correct. And we're providing really a ~egulatory review role with respect to the landscape architect. I Know Mr. Palate is here, who was the landscape architect for the county prior to Nancy Siemion. It is a little bi~ problematic from our perspective to have to enter in~o a discourse, a lengthy discourse or a time consuming discourse, or to try to influence design standards that landscape architects have been trained and signed and sealed. I mean, it either meets the code or it doesn't when we get to those standards. Page 11 16G 1 November 13, 1997 But to have the staff actually designing plans, I would be resistant to. CHAI~u~N DAVIS: Okay. Any other questions? I'm sor~/, Russell? b~. ?RIDDY: :~r. Davis, I did not support this particular item when it was originally put in, and still have a little problem with it from the standpoint that -- and I know it makes it easier for staff and for the county -- but this is one of those things that adds dollars to the cost of a project which, in Naples or the urban area,' may not give a hoot to anyone, but these are project killer things in Immokalee, or the little guy wanting to fix up or renovate a small building and put in a little shop in Immokalee, gets killed by the extra cost of having that seal on there. And, you know, from another standpoint, it's like, well, maybe I shouldn't go to a D.O., maybe I need to go to the ~.D., or maybe my wife shouldn't administer a Bandaid or aspirin to my kid; maybe we have to take him to the doctor, and do the real thing. And with that, we can move on. CHAI~2~ DAVIS: Thank you. With that, I'd invite anyone from the public that's here to speak on this particular amendment to come? to the microphone and state your name for the record. ~LR. ?ELLETIER: If I may, I have a handout, too, that I'd like · y'all to have. CHA!~N DAVIS: We can pass that down. Thank you, sir. MR. PELLETIER: !'~y name for the record is Ray Pelletier. I am i~ here today representing myself, my family and my company. I hold an Associates Degree in plant science from the State University of New York. I also have two years' working experience with the largest landscape company in the United States in Denver, Colorado, as well as 15 years running my o>~ full service landscape company here in Naples. We currently employ approximately 25 people. And as a note, my brother, John, joined our company in 1993, and holds a bachelor's degree in plant science from the same university. I'm here ~oday regarding the Collier County Landscape Code, and reques~ ~hat Section 2.21 be returned to its prior form that allowed landscape plans to be submitted by other persons authorized in Chapter 481, part ~wo. If you will, what Z'd like to do is just give you a little history of what actually happened here. The first part is the landscape task force was created, and I'm guessing that it was done because ~he development services advisory board had A through E hereI on your first page, >;ere concerns. This was on April 10th, and I ili would note that three landscape architects were there, as well as county staff. Staff was directed to contact a FNGA representative. We have an FNGA representative here today, and he'll give testimony as to that actually did not happen. Staff also agreed that language must be written into the code that allows only competent individuals to prepare landscape plans, if ~hey had stuck with that, I wouldn't be here today. On April 24th, they had another meeting where there were four landscape architects, Page 12 16G 1 November 13, 1997 staff, and then two people from the community. if you go do~ to item 4, it says, "the issue of who can prepare landscape plans was discussed." It was also stated that state law requires a landscape architectural seal on landscape plans. And that is incorrect. That's not my opinion, it's in a document that I'll give you later here in the package. There were two Collier County Commission meetings. At the firsit one, Commissioner Mac'Kie had the insight to ask the question, well,~~ what's the difference between who is the person who would have been ~ qualified to do a landscape plan and who isn't qualified any more? Staff answered that, and said that the statutes, as far as we understand them, require you have to be a landscape architect to submit plans. Again, that's incorrect, and i'll give you the document that says that's incorrect. Our recommendation is that we adhere to State statutes that staff is going on here. Not that we have any choice in the matter, but there's a question of it being a little gray. Ms. Student, who is here today, this is outlined, and it says specifically that it's somewhat of a gray area and because they are a noncharter county, their laws have to be consistent with the state law. All I'm asking you to do is go to the next page, if you would. The next page is October 30th, where visibly absent is the attorney'~ opinion that was requested on the 9th, and I've got an area highlighted that an individual said that he criticized the subcommittee because he didn't have one nurseryman there that he could tell. It's my understanding there was a nurseryman there, but he got so irate at the process that he left. A~nd then 'we have ~he result -- the resulting changes made to the Collier Ccunty Landscape Code Section 2.4.3.1. I've highlighted the areas uhat allowed my company to submit landscape plans, and the end reference is no result to state law. It's important we understand that I'm not t~ying to create something that wasn't in effect. This is a landscape code that served the co~unity for many, many years and have given the citizens of Collier County one of the most outstanding communities on the Planet Earth. Laws and rules, Chapter 481, Part II, this is the rule that I alluded to earlier, and if you go to the first highlighted area, 481.329, exceptions, exemptions from licensure, you can see number -- I won't read all of it, but the first few words are appropriate "this part shall not be deemed to prohibit any nurser%man, nursery stock dealer, as defined" -- and I won't bore you with the rest of i~. What's happening here is I am being prohibited. You can read through that. The next thing I have is the disciplinary rules of the Department of Professional Regulation Board of Landscape Architecture. The reascn that I added this in the package is that the ordinance befor~I you today has recommended the words, "be prepared by" be stricken, indicating we could prepare landscape plans and then pay to have an architect seal them prior to submitting. Page 13 I6G November 13, 1997~ There is no need to circumvent the intent of the law here, which is what 5 think they're trying to do, when their law is perfectly clear. These people knew what they were doing when they wrote the law; they put it in black and white, and there is no reason to circumvent it. And by circumvent it, I mean affixing or permitting to be affixed, his seal or name to any plan, specification, drawing, or other document which was not prepared by him or under his responsible supervising control, or %.'hich was not reviewed, approved or modified and adopted by him as his own work. We don't need to have our work adopted. We're professionals in our own right, and it would be demeaning to have anyone approve our' work. And they've got a nice little fine, and here on the next page, aiding and abetting unlicensed practice, $500 fine, up to a thousand, one year suspension, or probation. This is a route we don't need to We've already got our exemption. The reason I put this next document in is because it talks exactly about what we're trying to do, what the matter is before you today. If nothing else, if you set the legal matters aside and jus~ do what this committee from the Florida House of Representatives did, and decide to determine whether this was an issue of equity and fairness which it was. The first highlighted area says: "Although nursery stock dealers as defined in chapter 581 Florida Statutes can sell, design plans, they are exempt from landscape architectural requirements.- Do%~ here is exac~!y what I said. Staff determined that the question should be evaluated on the issue of fairness and equity and the issue was framed in an effort to determine whether qualified persons were prevented from practicing their full job scope under the current regulatory scheme. here. I'm sorry this is long, but there is an awful lot of information Findings and conclusions on that report, on number 4, you've heard tha~ there's some indication of whether or not we're a health, safety and welfare issue. Staff concludes that the practice of landscape design will not subject public health, safety and welfare to significant and discernible harm. On the next page, you'll see, in addition, there are currently exemption within the Landscape Architecture statute f6r nursery growers to practice landscape design. Consequently, there are currently individuals practicing landscape design who do not need tg have educational re~]irements. Staff has received no information regarding complaints against nursery growers for harm done to the public. It seems tha~ there should be some evidence of harm done to the public if there was some danger to the public from unqualified practitioners. Staff has not received any information or evidence of any significant and discernible harm that will affect the health, safety and welfare of the public in absence of licensure. So in conclusion, the report basically tells me you've got the laws in place, and if they follow the laws, there is no issue here. Page 14 ,. 16G i 1 November 13, 1997 ' With that, I d just like to say that I can appreciate the analogy ~hat Mr. ?riddy used and I kind of think of it as like a general practitioner, with all of his medical years of experience and his education, not being allowed to remove a hangnail on his own foot because he's not a podiatrist. This is just getting too specific, I believe. I have letters<'!of support from the Royal Palm Chapter which we'll read, and we have an individual from the Royal Palm Chapter of Florida Nurserymen and Growers' Association here to speak. We have a letter of support from ALCA, American Landscape Contractor's Association, and the Florida~ Landscape Designers Association. Thank you very much for your time. CHAIPd~AN DAVIS: If I could ask you a question? ~4R. PELLETIER: Yes, sir. CHAI~43~; DAVIS: Going back to page 12 under the state rules, Chapter 481, at the bottom where you've highlighted, where it talks about, I guess the last sentence being the key part, "insofar as he engages in the preparation of plans or drawings as an adjunct to merchandising." Tell me what that means. r~,. PELLETIER: What that means is that in order to be able tO merchandise my products I should be able to do a landscape design ~hat included my products and submit that to an individual who is interested in doing that and be able to do the design in that capacity. %~ether it's an individual, whether it's an individual business o'~ner, I should have that capability and shall not be prohibited from doing that. it MS. STUDENT: That's a sticking point. We don't think that that's the same landscape plan that we have in our code that's required currently to be signed and sealed and prepared by a landscape architect. And we uhink there's a distinction definitely between the two things. It's almost like I'm a lawyer and I have a law book salesman come and ask me what kind of law do you practice so I can sell you the types of books that you need to adequately practice law. And, ou~' know, that I could even design a system for you so hat you could access these materials more expeditiously than you ~ould normally be able to do. And then have him say, because ! can do this, I can be a lawyer. To me, it's a similar analogy. Or like a seller of pipe, sewer pipe or water pipe, saying I can be an engineer and design t~is To me that's a similar analogy. · r~R. PELLETIER: There you would have the simple health, safet~ and welfare issue, %~;hich you don't have here. ~4S. STUDENT: Well, I think there are health, safety and welfare issues in terms of .-- and I think staff can address what they are +- but in terms of the way the plantings are arranged around points of ingress and egress. Also the contour of the land and even the typ~ of plantings and how it might affect drainage, susceptibility to high' winds, aesthetics, and aesthetics are a proper health and safety issue, as well. Page 15 1 6 G November 13, 1997 I think staff can perhaps address that further. But it would~e our contention that there are health, safety and welfare ramifications to this. CHAI~Jd~ DAVIS: Okay. Mr. Priddy? · MR. PRIDDY: Ms. Student, you say that you contend that we'rei~not talking about the same plan that staff reviews? MS. STUDENT: I think staff is going to be able to address it~~ That's what I'm told, in my discussions with staff and landscape architects. MR. PELLETIER: As far as drainage is concerned, maybe Mr. Mulhere can help me out with this, but on my project, the nursery ~hat brought this all under way, got it all started, you know, I hire an engineer to do all my drainage for me, okay. He does all the calculations on the runoff, the water retention areas. We don't get involved in that at this point. So basically what I'm given from an engineer typically is a site plan with the drainage indicated on it. And i have the buffer areas, the triangles that they have in the code, as far as ingress and egress are all very obvious. And anybody wi~h a high school education can read the code. There's a few simple calculations that you have to do as far as paved area and greenspa~e, but it's nothing that any one of our high school graduates could not do. MS. STUDENT: And my response to that is our office, the County Attorney's Office, would be unnecessary if any high school graduate could read the Land Code and Comp Plan and some of the permutation~ to it. MR. PRIDDY: S.~ what's your point? I mean, what would be wrong with that? If it were simple enough that we could all function without having to ~- CHAI~ DAVIS: i think the point, Mr. Priddy, is, it isn't. MR. :.~LHERE: £ think, you know, i'll even muddy it up a little bit more. Maybe i'm oversimplifying it, but i see it as this issue. We require an engineer sealed plan for a sit~ development plan. We ~ ..... itect s seal to ensure consistency with our architectural requ'~ ar~.~ , - standards. We don't ha'0, e to do that. We do. And we don't have to require a landscape architect's seal for a landscape plan. We do. The Board a~)proved it. Now the question is, should we continue to do that or not, and the only legal question from my perspective, are we within our leggl rights to require a landscape architect's seal on our plans the wa~ we have it written, excluding one and two family. That, to me, is th~ only question. There may be another question for somebody, you kn~w. That's the first question to ask. , CHAIRPLA_N DAVIS: Right. MR. MULHERE: A~d then the second question is if we can do that, if we are within our legal rights to do that as a county, should we. So I don't know that, you know, public health, safety and welfare is the only issue or the issue that drives this. MS. STUDENT: Furthermore, I think it's interesting to note -- and I don't know the date; could you tell me, Ray, the date of the ~ Page 16 November 13, 1997 Florida House of Representatives Landscape Design Architecture, if you want to call it a white paper? CHAIR/YuaN DAVIS: ~4s. Student, excuse me, I think Mr. Mulhere j~st made a very good point. And I think part of our thought process wh!ile it's albeit not unanimous, as Mr. Priddy pointed out, the first time we went around with this, and it pertains to exactly what Mr. ~4u!h~ire said. It's one and you've addressed that, are we within our legal limits -- legal justification as a county to make this requirement. And then number two, do we as a county want to have this requirement. And so I think that's put it in context. MR. PELLETIER: To that I would say it worked right up until last year, the old county code, you know. The main reason that this whole thing, question, began was because someone was overworked in the department, in the landscape department. They said there were incompetent people bringing them in and that's what caused the extra work. And what i would like to say is, what happens when just the burden from the landscape architects becomes too much for the staff? Do they just require that only a landscape architect with a 4.0 grade average can submit landscape plans? They didn't address the problem, and that's what I'm asking you gentlemen to do here today. C~tI~4AN DAVIS: Thank you. MR. ~&ULHERE: With all due respect to Mr. Pe!ietier, and I mean that sincerely because I've had a lot of conversations with him, that was not the genesis for this requirement, it was not the question of whether or not the landscape architect was o';erworked. I will tell you, %hough %hat tn our analysis, there is a much higher level quali%y of iandscape plans submitted by a landscape architect tha~: anybody out there doing any development, which was what we had before. This issue is much more specific, or ~4r. Pelletier's issue is!~ much more specific, because it deals with nurserymen; it doesn't deal with necessarily anybody out there. But that's what the code allowed before. And the result was not the level of landscape plan that, in the wisdom of the Board of County Commissioners this community wanted to see. ' And that's why -- i'm not speaking for the Board -- but I assume that's why that and it really had little to do if it was simply a question of work, we can hire another landscape archi(ect. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: ~4r. York? ~4R. PELLETIER: With all due respect to Mr. ~4ulhere, if I may -- I'm sorry -- on April 24th, number 4, the same thing. I didn't read the entire thing because I didn't think it was necessary but staff~ explained that, for a time period, unqualified individuals were submitting plans thac did not meet minimum code. Furthermore the~ required extra time to review. ' I would consider that a reason for why it began initially as 9ne of it. So with that, I would just like -- I've taken up enough of?you gentlemen's time. Thank you very much. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Pelletier. Mr. York? P[R. YORK: I, you know, I think that somebody like Mr. Pelletier, Page 17 November 13, 1997 who has been around and been in business and has the expertise to do this, should be somehow exempted from this. I have a 23-year-old son that just graduated from Purdue with a degree in landscape ~ architecture, and I would much rather take -- at this point -- much rather take ~4r. Pelletier's plans than I would those of my son ~ (Laughter.) · CHAI~4AN DAVIS: With that, yes, ~4r. Nelson. ~4R. :;ELSON: Just a quick comment. But at the same time, Mr. ~ Pelletier indicated he hired engineers in order to do a lot of the grading, and things like that sort of work. It just seems to me that if, in fact, he has to hire engineers to do certain forms of work, he has to hire landscape architects to, you know to give the proper seals to it. ' CHAI?JVu~N DAVIS: Well, let's get the rest of the input from the public and then we can have our discussion and our very wise decision. ~4R. TYSON: Good evening. I'm Bruce ~tson. I'm a registered landscape architect within the State of Florida. ~4ost of the things that you've heard this evening I'll just quickly highlight. The biggest problem that we have as a body with the way in which the county wishes to approach this, is the fact that they would like to strike out the words "prepared by." What that means is that we will have to start self-policing ourselves because, as Mr. Pelletier pointed ou~, right in our o~ law -- and I will give you a copy of ~he entire law. And - underlined in particular those items dealing with the seals of display on page 2, item number 3, which -- and I'll read it again, too, because ! think it's ve~t important. It says that: "No registered landscape architect shall affix or permit to be affixed his seal or name to any plan, specification, i~ drawing or other doc,.h~ent which was not prepared by him or under hi~ responsible supervising control or which was not reviewed, approved, or modified, and adopted by him as his own work with full responsibility as a landscape architect for such documents." In essence, what i~ amounts to then, is theoretically, someone could go out and prepare it and then find somebody else to go ahead and sign and seal it. Now, whether that's legal, illegal, against our o'~n regulati,.'~n or not. that's something else. But the point being ~ that everything that i think was brought up, primarily goes against, the grain of the Stale statutes dealing with landscape architecture. It has nothing to do 'with the way in which the county wishes to approach this. So many of the things that were stated deal with the capabilit~ies or what a nurseryman can or can't do as it relates to the State code dealing wiuh landscape architects, not dealing with what the county chooses to do with these things. It's our position in looking at this that we think it's very important, first of all, to leave the word "prepared by" in the document and leave it just as it is, as Ms. Student had indicated earlier. Many of the things that have been brought about, or brought this regulation about, dealt with -- and I think either Mr. Della or Page 18 16G 1 November 13, 1997 Nancy Siemion can go ahead and relate to some of those things. Sut Zet me just point out that even though I've only been in the county for two years, I've spent a lot of time, with a few of you, as well, working out the architectural guidelines. Those didn't have to be done: there was no reason to do those necessarily, unless something was meant to be done to achieve a greater feeling from a standpoint of ambiance within the community. We would look at this as being something that would tend to just start to tear down those regulations. There have to be a number of very well qualified people, I have no argument about that, from the standpoint of nurserymen in the practice. On the other hand, if it's simply deregulated to allow anybody to do it, that's exactly what that means. And I'm afraid it would be such an incredible burden to staff, that we'd all be starting to get the work slowed down simply because of that. It's because of this beautification program, the medians, what~ you fee! in the ambience when you come into Collier County is one of' the reasons I'm here. And I'd certainly like to see a lot of those things continue. There are, at last count, some 14 registered landscape architects out here. I don't ~hink they all need to stand up and basically say the s~e thing I do. But in particular, I'd like to invite Wayne Hook, who has some e~erience in dealing with this, and the process that he wen5 through, his story, as well as maybe Nancy or Joe and let them tell you the specifics as to the reason why the law is the way in which it is. Thank you. CHAIRMA~ DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Tyson, and thank you for your guidance and brevity tonight. ~d/q. HOOK: Good evening. For the record my name is Wayne Hook I've been a resident of Collier County since 1969. I was involved with zhe school system for a number of years, helped write part of the cur.,cui,~m that we still have today. Parz o~ my degree and training was in environmental design, and I was doing landscape plans when I was teaching. My degree is in fine arts, also. i got into the landscape and nursery business about 1980, and like Ray, I was a landscape designer and a nurser,yman. We had our own product to sell. At one time, we had 34 acres on one side of Airport Road and 43 acres on the other side of Airport Road. So in ~ that instance, we really had a product to sell to design into things, to meet the la~. This was prior to all these laws. We were very interested and very involved in designing commercial projects, and all like that. But as Collier County grew and as the state grew, the need for control, the need for rules and regulations; what are we going to do with storm, water; what are we going to do with these traffic problems; what are we going to do with hurricane and beach protection. As South Florida grew, so did the complexity of the rules and regulations. As a landscape designer, I was faced with well, do we 'go out and hire a landscape architect for our firm; do we team up with a Page 19 16G 1 November 13, 1997 landscape architect? Because Z began to realize it was beyond my . scope of abilities to continue to do these plans, legally or illegally, and I was faced with doing things borderline. And, as Mri. Oates knows, I can't do that, because I'm involved with another organization in town. But we went all those routes. We hired landscape architects, we teamed up with landscape architects, and as we did that I learned that there is a lot to landscape architecture that has nothing to do with preparing a planting plan, which is why the State has set aside, I believe, single family, duplex, and mobile home parks, which makes UP I can't imagine, probably 50 or 60,000 homes or so in this county, versus what we're actually talking about right now are SDP plans, which only make up a small minuscule part of this thing. And that's where the difference is. Difference between SDP preparation is different than preparing a planting plan for a single family residence. So I began to find out well, what can I do to become a landscape architect, because this is the trend, this is where the industry is going. And if I want to get in there and do what I used to do with~, some of the high rises along Gulfshore Boulevard that I helped design; if I want to continue to do that, then I've got to upgrade. Well, The State provides a vehicle for us to do that. If you wish to make the transition from landscape designer or nurseryman aQd get into landscape architecture so that you can do all three, you can do that. There's a gentleman in here that teaches the classes for that for the whole sta~e. It's a very involved review process and it's not just degree to degree. You have an internship program; you have, it's a national exam, given at the same time the architect's exam is given. It's three days, eight hours for two days and ten hours the next day, just as hard as you can go. It's good for the United States and Canada, and it is no easy thi~g ~o do, but it's doable for those who wish to go that next stage. And there are reasons for going there. The fellow that just spoke has been a friend c~f mine since -- we've been sharing business ever since '.~e both got into it and he's a very qualified fellow. There is a difference, ~hough, between residential, and getting into commercial projects. And some of the reasons we changed, I think Joe Delate or NancY, I used %o have to come try to justify what I was doing to them as a! designer, oka]~/. And if you, as a developer, want to present or to a project, you go through the process with the engineers, the architects and landscape architects, and it's submitted to the county. But it is ~ut back weeks or months because we're having to wait for the projects to go through review, review, review, because they haven't read all the code; they are not trained in all those fields~~ It can cost you, the developer, a lot of money also, as well as the! county tax-payers. There's a lot of reasons for this, and I think there is plenty of opportunity for people in the design business, people in the nursery Page 20 16G 1 November 13, 1997 business, and for the landscape architecture. But there's a reason~ for all this. And I think the county, in its wisdom, anybody driving north or south up 41, when you hit the county line and you hit Lee County versus Collier County, take a look. We're talking about visual impac%: what is the difference. A_nd I think Collier County chose to be different and to set these standards. Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Next speaker. Come right on up. Don't be the least bit bashful. ~R. DAVENPORT: Hello. My name is Greg Davenport. I'm with Davenport's Nursery, a family owned and operated business in Collier County for the past 25 years. I am the current vice-president of the local Florida Nurserymen and Growers Association, ~own as the Royal Palm Chapter. We are one of 14 chapters statewide, with over 2,000, members. I'm here today to oppose the changes in the Landscape Code made on October 30, 1996, as an official representative of the FNGA. In. the minutes from the Landscape Code Task Force meeting held on April 10, 1996 it states that ~ancy Siemion shall contact an representative to participate on the task force. This never happened. The way the local chapter found out about the change is by Ray!! Pelletier. He advised us that he was restricted from submitting a landscape plan for his own nursery, and by State law, he has every right to submit that plan himself. In closing, I would urge this coramittee to abide by State law ~and allow Ray Pelletier his full rights as a qualified nurseryman to submit landscape plans on commercial projects. I'd also like to say to Mr. Davis, as an adjunct to merchandising our material, as a small business in Immokalee in the early '80s when the Handy stores were being built in Immokalee, that gave us an opportunity to merchandise our plant material by this State law. Thank you. CHAII~4kN DAVIS: Thank you. ~R. MULHERE: ~4r. Davis, I just want to add for the record, we do not agree that there was not a representative of the Nursery Growers Association. In fact, the makeup of that subcommittee, that task force, was endorsed ~3y the Board and the members were'named. Whether or not that member of the Nursery Growers Association,' in fact, communirated back with the association, I cannot attest to. But the members of ~hat included George Botner, who is a landscape architect; Gail Boorman, who is a landscape architect; Sid Showalt~r, who is a member of FNGA, but is also a landscape and irrigation contractor; Brian Nelson, who is a landscape architect; James Square, who o~s a landscaping business, Squares Landscaping, and is also an FNGA representative. At least, it was represented to us that he was. Lynn Nelson who is, Mr. Fitz -- Ray's Greenscape, I think is that the contract -- landscape maintenance individual. So the makeup of that was not only endorsed, and I believe we represented those individuals to the Board of County Commissioners Page 21 November 13, 1997 with ~ in~ ~ ...... n~ion of tryina to have some cross-section of the indu~- ~ - -~ry t..ere, i can't answer as to whether or not they effective%y communicated back to the associations that they, you know, allegedly represented. CHAI~!AN DAVIS: Thank you. MR. DAVENPORT: Yes, I mean, they were not elected board members of our organization and we had no idea they were even coming to these meetings. Jim Square rarely comes to our chapter meetings. Sid Showalter rarely comes. So that's a very poor representation of the FNGA and I think there should have been a little bit more done to get a representative on this committee. Thank you. CHAI~J~N DAVIS: Thank you. Next speaker. MR. ?OGG: Good evening. My name is George Fogg. I'm a landscape architect and i want to speak to four points very briefly~ One of them, and I think most important, that I would like to bring up, is what constitutes a competent individual to perform landscape architectural services or, in fact, even nursery services. I would use as an example, unfortunately not all nurserymen are as qualified as Mr. Pelletier is. My nephew, who all of you I'm sure have heard of Fogg's Nursery, my nephew has no education in plant material, has little or no knowledge about plant material, other than what any of you might have and maybe not anywhere near as much. And, according to what is being requested here tonight, we are being requested to let people like my nephew, who is a wonderful guy and a great person in what he does, to be in fact qualified to submit plans to the county. I assure you he isn't qualified nor would even claim to be qualified. So in effect, what is being asked is that the county establishl~ some sort of screening or testing procedures to qualify, quote, nurserymen to be capable of submitting adequate plans. I don't think we want tc 7et into that procedure. At one time, i had the opportunity to work helping out here at ~he county for six weeks as a person reviewing plans that were submitted. I substituted for Joe when he was overseas for six weeks. One of the things ~hat I found out very, very quickly,, was that plans, when they were submitted by non-professionals, came in and were almost universally rejected because they did not have the required information on them, or were totally unusable. There 'was another requirement that used to be on there and whidh was deleted at the last round of changes, and that was that an individual who supposedly owned the property, could attest to the fact that those plans were prepared by supposedly himself. But all the attesting actually did was that he signed the plan, and there was never any qualification that he had to do the plans. And the plansi'[ almost invariably, with almost no exceptions, came in on the same format and the same engineering drawing as the engineer0s plan or as the architect's plan. I could only conclude that, in fact, all that this signature by Page 22 16G 1 November 13, 19971i the individual carried was an attesting to the fact that he signed that plan, and not that he did the plans, because there was never any indication that I prepared these plans and there was never any qualification thereof. i would only add that, as Mr. Hook indicated -- and by the way, he did take the exam and did pass it, and he is now a registered landscape architect. There are others who are taking the same procedure that Wayne did and are close to passing the exam. It can be done if someone wishes to become a practitioner of landscape architecture. It is doable: it can be done within a reasonable tim~ period. And with that, i have a n'~foer of other points which, I'm sure~ have been in some degree o: another covered. I would like to conclude with only one other comment, and that: is, i've recently received an article from Pine Island which simply says that Lee County is working on their medians and trying to improve things, and in no wa7 do they expect to catch up to Collier County in the foreseeable future. I think this indicates only that Collier County intends -- has been and i hope intends to continue to keep us as a leader in and as a quality place to live in the aesthetics of the landscape here. Thank you. CHAIP2V~A~ DAVIS: Thank you. ~. ~R~\GE: Can I ask you a question before you sit down? CHAIP~Mf~I DAVIS: Mr. Wrage? ~. %~tAGE: Other than a business license, what does it take to become a nurseryman? M_R. FOGG: Darned if I know. MR. >;RAGE: Thank you. CHAIRMA~$ DAVIS: There might be an additional speaker that could answer that for us. Yes, sir. Come right on up. MR. FORD: My name is Michael Ford. I'm a board member for the FLDA. They are based out of Jacksonville; I don't know if you know! them very much or heard of them. You might have some reports. I know that you have some. Speaking as a board member, we are opposed to what they are doing here right now. There's a lot of different avenues I could go down. ?~o is qualified to do a landscape plan? I've been d6ing it for 15~ years. I've worked for Gail; I've worked for Dean Barnes in Tampa.~ I have to admit that my line quality design capabilities did come from, a lot fzom working with them, but I also went to school for it. And everybody is talking about capabilities and qualifications, and~ where do you put a limit on it? We're not just everybody coming off the street. A lot of us have a lot of schooling, a lot of us have an awful lot of experience. Like I say, where do you draw the line? Speaking as a registered landscape contractor and, here in Naples, I can see both sides of the story. But where do you put -- like i say, where do you put a limit on it? Like with Ray, I think he's very well qualified to do what he's doing for his particular piece of property. I mean, here you've got someone who is trying to Page 23 1 b:ovember 13, 1997 promote his abilities and what he can do on his o'~n piece of property, yet he has to go to a landscape architect to have him draw it and prepare ~_, or at least to have him seal it. So maybe it would be a good point to say we can extend the code to include commercial up to, say, a small parcel, like strip malls. I don't know if you want to get into that, like this other gentleman said, but that might be a consideration, because there are certain instances, like Ray, where that's going to come up. That's another avenue; it's hard to see 'which way it could go. There has %o be someplace that we can meet. We seem to be being pitted against landscape architects, landscape designers. First of all, again as a board member, we are currently pursuing legislation to change the gray areas of who is currently qualified to draw landscape designs, and specifically commercial, but to reinforce the residential so the landscape architects don't come back and say no, we're not qualified to do residential. We don't want to pit ourselves against them; we want to upgrade the industry here, as well. Ray made the statement that b;aples is beautiful and has been, and we haven't had any problems with that. And the other gentleman made a statement that Fort 14yers doesn't even foresee catching up with us. Well, there's a lot of landscape designers out there that did some of that work, and they created that beauty, too. So there has to be some consideration in there for those people, who have high school or e>rperience, many years of exlDerience of putting plants in the ground. I know some landscape architects who don't know anything about putting plants in the ground, but I'm not here to attack them. I'm! just saying there's differences on both sides. There is people that' aren't as qualified ,)n both sides as some of the others. So you really need to look at this and decide where you would like to go with that. But again back to FLDA, because Z have two sides that I'm representing, because I've been here for 15 years -- well, actually, I'm from here. I'm fouruh generation from here, and I've seen an awful lot of changes, and that's one of the reasons why I became a landscape designer. I went to the University of Florida, went two years of landscape architecture, and rea]iz~d that there are a lot of ardhitects out ' there at that particular time and maybe some now that aren't as qualified for doing planning design. Now, we're talking about conceptual planning design. Again, we can get back into the health and safety deal, but I don't personally think that ~here is any health and safety issue, either. If I'm going uo do a commercial plan, or if I attempted to do a commercial plan, I would look at the scope of that plan and see if:I was qualified to even attempt it. I wouldn't be in business very long if I ~ried to attempn something and pass it and give it to the board or give it to Nancy and then say, well, this is completely wrong. I would have enough insight to go back and read those codes and: to see wha[ i need to do. And most people who are in business would Page 24 November i3, 1997 do that, because they wouldn't be in business very long. And I've been doing it for 15 years, like i said, so you learn what you have do. So you have to give that consideration, too, because a landscape contractor who might be qualified to do a landscape design, as far as ability, would do exactly the same. MR. PEDONE: Mike? CHAIRM3~ DAVIS: Yes. MIR. PEDONE: Can you tell me how do you distinguish between a contractor who's got the capability and one who doesn't? What's to stop Joe's Landscaping, who's been cutting grass for the past 12 years, to decide that he could do a plan? And how do you then police your group to know how do you -- have the county know who is the qualified person or who is not qualified, if you don't have a seal? MR. FORD: That's a very good question. What FLDA is trying to do and is currently in legislation right now or to pass a bill, stating that under the Department of Agriculture, I believe it is, to have a certification process determined by the Department of Agriculture, ',;ho is qualified and who isn't. ~R. PED©NE: But in the meantime, what do we do? MR. FORD: I'm not on the board, so I can't answer that question. MR. PEDONE: Well, in the meantime, you have nothing to distinguish between who knows what they're doing and who doesn't know what they're doing. So my feeling at that point, would be, well, th~n you give it to the people who you know know what they're doing, because they've got the education and the degree. MR. FORD: But in this particular instance with Ray Pelletier, I think he's qualified to do that on his own property. MR. PEDONE: He may be very well qualified. But if you give him the right to do it, then you have to give Joe's Landscaping the right to do it, too, at this time. You understand? If you have something that says yes, you're licensed as a landscape designer, okay, and you're certified with the Department of Professional. Regulation as such, because you've passed a test, you've reached certain qualifications. When that happens, then maybe we'd want to -- I would say we would revisit this. But until that happens, I think you have to look out for the welfare of tke county, or whatever you want to call i~, for design, and whatever, and make sure that you have qualified people doing it MR. FORD: But why change what's already here? MR. PEDONE: What's already here now says you have to bear it. MR. FORD: There's already a State law that says Ray is qualified to do that. MR. PEDONE: Well, you know, I'll tell you, I've got two of them here, and they're both Chapter 481, Part II, and on 481.329, exceptions from licensure, the two of these are completely different. So who's right here? On part 5, and part 5 which he had marked down, they no way resemble one another. This one says: "That part shall not be deemed to prohibit any nurseryman, nursery stock dealer or agent," and in Page 25 16G I November 13, 1997 this one that was handed out, it's: "This part shall not be construed to affect part one of this chapter." And it goes on to say what chapter, "except that no such person shall use the designation or term landscape architect, landscape architectural, landscape architecture,.' and so on, and giving the impression that he is a landscape architect. They are both part 5 of the same subparagraph. Do we have two' different years here? ~R. FORD: I don't know. I haven't seen that. ~R. PEDONE: This one here says 1998, and it's to be effective October l, 1998, or repealed effective 1998. So I don't know. It doesn't gi';e a date on here as to when this one was enacted. And it doesn't give a date -- oh, this one says December, '95 So which one is right? ' MS. STUDENT: I have a copy from our statutes in the County Attorney's Office, and I'll be happy to read the entire thing into the record. "This part shall not be deemed to prohibit any nurseryman, nursery stock dealer or agent, as defined by Chapter 581" -- and I have the definition which I'll read into the record in a minute -- ''who is required under Chapter 581 to hold a valid license issued by' the Division of Plant Industry of the Department of Agriculture and' Consumer Services, and who does hold a valid license to engage in the business of selling nursery stock in this state, insofar as he engages in the preparation of plans or drawings as an adjunct to merchandising his product, so long as he does not use the title, term or designation landscape architect, landscape architectural, landscape architecture L.A., landscape engineering or any description tending to convey the impression that he is a landscape architect, unless he is registered as provided in this part, or is exempt from registration under the provisions of this part." b~. PEDONE: So what you're saying, Ms. Student, then is that -~- MS. STUDENT: I beg your pardon? MR. PEDONE: Wha% you're saying then, according to the code here, to the s~atute, is that a landscape designer or nurseryman is allowed MS. STUDENT: No, I'm not saying that. I don't know if a nurseryman and a landscape designer is the same thing -- MR. PEDQNE: Same ~hing. MS. STUDENT: -- and nobody has told me that. But I'm saying ~'he law exempts the preparation of plans or drawings as an adjunct to the sale or merchandising of his product. I think that's different than the kind of landscape plan the county looks at, and I wish that staff would explain that to you. That's what's been explained to me. PER. PEDONE: Well, I've built before and -- MS. STUDENT: And for the record, I need to have somebody put that on the record. ~. PEDO[~E: I've built before and I've gotten plans from a landscape or a nursery and -- of course, it was a single family home -- but the whole idea of giving me the plans was the hope that I would use their plan and buy their product. Page 26 November 13, 1997' MS. STUDENT: Right. And I think that plan is distinguishable ' from the kind of plan that the county will review. Also, the definition of a nurseryman, under 581.011, paragraph 20 is, "any person engaged in the production of nursery stock for sale or distribution." ~R. PEDONE: It also mentions, though, in that part 4 that you just read a little while ago, that a valid license issued by the Division of Plant Industry. Now, do nurserymen or landscape designers hold a valid license? MR. FORD: A nurseryman does. MS. STUDENT: I think a nurseryman does. MR. PEDONE: A nurseryman does. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: All right. We need to move along here. Did you have anything else, sir? MR. FORD: No. Thank you. CHAI~4A/W DAVIS: Thank you verY much. Anyone else to speak? MS. SIEMION: Yes. I'm Nancy Siemion, Collier County Landscape Architect, and I review the plans that are submitted as part of our~, SDP process. And the reason we closed this loophole a year ago is that we were reserving many plans that required extensive staff time for review because they were not -- they just did not meet our minimum codes. There's a great deal of knowledge that is required in order to submit a plan that will meet our minimum code and includes information, such as knowledge about drainage requirements; not putting certain plants in the bottom of swales because certain plants don't like wet feet; requirements about cold tolerances. We have requirements about not planting on top of utilities or below utilities; we have native plagt re~airements. There are safety issues such as keeping our sight triangles clear. Those are the triangles that when you come to an intersection, that you see past the vegetation in order to see oncoming traffic. There .~re issues about not planting trees which will ultimately rip up pavement and sidewalks, which could cause people to trip and I have heard of instances where that has happened and municipalities get sued for thaz. And we also have requirements for irrigation, they have to be kaowledgeabte about irrigation. And these are th4. ngs that -- just some of the things, there are many more -- that people need to be knowledgeable about when they submit a landscape plan. And at the moment, the only measure that ~e have in place is a registered landscape architect. There are no other people that are qualified to submit these plans, other than by thati! measure. And the problem we had prior to adoption of this was that we had just too many people who didn't have the knowledge to submit a plan that would get through the process in a timely fashion. CHAIFdVSI/W DAVIS: Okay. Thank you. MR. ~ILHERE: Just one thing. The term "loophole" was used. I wouldn't really call it a loophole. The law allowed it prior to; it Page 27 16G 1 November 13, 1997 doesn't allow it now. I'd have to correct that. [4R. YORK: May I ask a question? CHAI?i~AN DAVIS: Mr. York. MR. 'fORK: In your professional opinion then, a nurseryman is ~not qualified to submit a landscape architectural plan? MS. SI~ION: It's possible he could be, but we don't know. And if we open this up to everybody, it becomes a free-for-all, where We would be letting in people who may not be knowledgeable. MR. YORK: For licensure for a nurser/man -- and I assume they are licensed -- are there requirements that would qualify them to submit plans? MR. :4/3LHERE: I don't think we're aware of any. MS. SIEMION: No. MS. STUDENT: I looked at the statute, and I think they have a license so ~hey know -- and maybe somebody could correct me if wrong, because I looked at that part very quickly -- but they know~ about plants so they are not selling bad plants, diseased plants, things like that. I couldn't find anything in the statute dealing with the nurserymen that has anything to do whatsoever with preparing anything like a landscape plan. And I read the definition of a nurseryman into the record, and that's somebody that sells plant material. CHAI~ DAVIS: Okay. M~. MULHERE: I think it's important, not just to repeat, one i thing that Nancy said that's very important is, that no one is saying here, no one from the staff is intimating that there probably aren't individuals who are qualified and who, in fact, may be more qualified than some cf the landscape architects sitting in the audience. No one is saying that might not be a fact. What we're saying is ,we have to have some baseline, and by opening it up, we allow the wide spectrum. By keeping the code as we ha'/e i~ written today requiring a landscape architect, we know that those individuals have had the training and are qualified. I mean, it's no different than an engineer or, as I said, a building architect, in my opinion. So I don't think anyone has ever said that individuals who don't hold the degree of landscape architect may not be ~alified to do that. I mean, I don't think we can ansWer that question. , C}~IPd~AN DAVIS: Thank you. MS. STUDENT: i agree with what Bob says. It's just establishing a baseline. CHAIPdVJ~; DAVIS: Any other speakers? MR. HOOK: Perhaps I can answer that last question. MR. OATES: Come up and use the mike. CHAIrmAN DAVIS: If you come up, Mr. Hook, and state your nam~ for the record again. M3.. HOOK: Wayne Hook. The question of landscape architects ~nd landscape designers and nurserymen, the FNGA is very proactive in trying to set up some type of qualifications and regulations and screening and testing, so that we can have some measure. The state Page 2 8 November 13, 1997 currently has only one thing in place right now to measure qualifications, and that is through the university system, six years of education for landscape architecture and then pass the national exam. FNGA is ve~t active right now with a Florida certified landscape contractor exam that they offer. It's a course you take, you pass Ithe test and through FNGA. I think this is a precursor to the State wanting to issue a license for landscape contractors, where there would be a State test, just like there is for general contractors, and levels of general contractors. The nurserymen, there's a class, a specific test and exam that you can take through Florida Nurserymen's Association to better become -- or become better in your field. But the State doesn't have any of those testing programs right now. And the only thing, the only vehicle that the State has right now is through landscape architecture because it is a degree and it is the only thing that is nationally tested. But Collier County is beautiful because there are landscape designers, because there are nurserymen, and because there are landscape architects. And I think right now, everybody has worked together, and that's why we have what we have; and there are reasons for it. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Thank you. MR. YORK: You know, the only problem that I have with this -- and I hate to single out Mr. Pelletier -- but it appears that in prior years, he's been able to submit plans, and if this amendment goes as proposed, then that cuts him off. But if he was qualified before, :now he's not qualified. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: He got cut off a year ago. MP,. 'fORK: Right. CHAIF~%N DAVIS: Yes, ma'am. MS. BOORMAN: My name is Gall Boorman. I'm a landscape architect and I'll De brief. I just thought you should know, i'm old. I've been practicing in the field of landscape architect since 1976, and as a licensed professional since 1979. So I have, unfortunately or fortunately, depending on your point of view, institutional memoI%;. When the landscape architects law, as it currently stands, was first contemplated by the State, we went from a title law, which basically said, well, you can do landscape architecture as long as ~ou don't call yourself a landscape architect. We converted uhat into a preface law which says, you can't do landscape architecture unless you're a landscape architect, which made a lot more sense to a lot of people, including the FNGA, who supported landscape architects very strongly in this endeavor, because they realized thau the growth of landscape architecture as a profession :in the State of Florida was good for the industry. Landscape architecture is a very closely allied industry with' nurserymen and growers, obviously. Even though there's a whole host of kinds of things that landscape architects are trained to do, the Page 29 16G 1 November 13, 1997' planting scene is one where we interact very closely. FNGA realized at that time that their business was the growing and selling of plants, not design or design related issues or site : planning or any of those kinds of things. And as such, as long as a provision was made in the law, which still stands there today, that' says that they can draw plans in order to sell plant material, then they would be exempted from the landscape architectural practice law in tha~ sense. So i think there's an important distinction to be made here. There is nothing in the county ordinance, as it stands currently without revision, that precludes Mr. Pelletier or anybody else who is in the nursery business from selling plant material, or from drawing up plans to further that end. Ms. Student, however, has made a very valid point about that distinction between the training necessary for the preparation of intelligent landscape and site plans, as opposed to a plan that's drawn up as a sales tool. And that is the distinction that is draw~ in the law. As far as what kinds of testing or value judgments that have to be made as far as qualifying nurserymen to prepare plans, t~ my knowledge, :here are none in the state law. So the previous statements that were made that the only bench '~ line for measure that we have currently is the statute concerning landscape architecture is true. And I was involved back in the late '70s when the law was enacted, so hence, the institutional memory. i would also suggest that some comments have been made about the committee that convened in '96 to look at this, and I would tell you that %he changes that were made to the ordinance at that time were not at the behest of landscape architects. They were at the behest of a problem that occurred because we did not have these provisions within our code, and I think you've heard from staff that those are valid considerations. The last ~hing that ~ would like :o say is that there is going to be exceptions to everv rule. That's the problem with rules, generally, :s that there's always an exception somewhere that doesn't quite fit in the rule or doesn't quite seem right or fair. But we all have to abide by the rules. Mr. Hook has identified the fact that, you know, if you want to go into landscape architecture and sign and seal plans and do all ~ those things that LAs, then you can do that. There is nobody that,~~ going to stop you. But if we design our rules to fit the exceptions, then we have designed our rules to the lowest common denominator, a~d we become Lee County again. Thank you very much. . CHAI?2431N DAVIS: Thank you, Ms. Boorman. Any other speakers? Please come forward. You know, we've reached a time where you're not allowed 5o be repetitive. (Laughter.) MR. ANDREA: Hi. My name's Christian Andrea, I'm with Architectural Land Design. I'm a landscape architect. Much of what we do as landscape architects is planting plants. ~ But much of what makes the planting plan work is the site plan. I Page 3 0 November !3, 1997 find that many of the plans I submit, Collier County requires some adjustment on my part to meet the county standards. So I find -- and we have l0 percent perimeter -- excuse me, interior greenspace requirements, 10 percent building perimeter greenspace requirements -- and I find most of the plans that are submitted to me to be turned: into planting plans do not meet those requirements. So I find I have to go back to my client, the engineer or the owner to make those adjustments to the site plan so I have a valid plan to even attemp~ to submit to the county. So that's one item that affects the planting plans I don't think has been discussed yet. ' CHAIR/4A2J DAVIS: Thank you, ~4r. Andrea. Anyone else to speak~ Seeing none, we're done with the public input part. I think we're to the discussion point, and it seems to me where we've got a situation 'where staff has proposed a change to us. We've heard people speak that say no change is necessary, the code should be left as it is. And then ~;e".'e heard testimony tonight that we should consider going back to what i~ was, it used to be to lay it back out, at least in my mind. ' If anyone has a different -- yes, Mr. Bruet? ~R. BRUET: I spent a lot of time in my last 15 years with landscape architects, and I find most of the time they bring a lot.'to the table besides just plants and their selection. But we've usedi them many times in planning processes, in the drainage design calculations. And if any of us here have sat do~rn and gone through the landscape ordinances you've got to have a background to unde~st. ~hem, or you' e going to be in and out of the county . ~ ~-~_~nd r ~ offlc=o ~ long. And to try to lump nurse~y~nen into this category, I -- I just,I~' I cannot endorse that. I think Mr Pelletier is kind of an anomaly here. ' i think obviously, he has the abilities to perform landscape design. Rut to write an ordinance that would allow only him into that process would be 'leaf difficult, and I don't believe I could support that. I certainly can support a nurseryman designing and implementinlg design plans on his ow~ property. I think it's blank not to allow him to do ~hat. But i also want to say, and I don't mean this facetiously, but if ~4r. Pelletier had devoted as much'time -- I'm sorry -- the 5ime that he devoted to this issue and chasing this cause around, if he had devoted that to getting his landscape license he probably would have one by now. ' ~4R. PELbETIER: It takes six years. ~.. BRUET: Well0 you'd be -- you'd be well ahead. I don't believe i~ would take six years; I don't think that's how long the process takes. I'm not a landscape architect. But really, I think you're the type, of person tha~'s qualified to step up to that role and you wind up wiqh a landscape architect license, a nurseryman license, and that to me sounds ~ike a pretty solid business. And I lust can't lump all your journeymen and all your people behind you into this ordinance. Page 31 16G November 13, 1997 If Immokalee has some adjustments to it, I could certainly be receptive to that. I can understand Russell's concern about that, and, you know, i think there might be some flexibility there. But certainly within the urban boundaries, i would see no change, Mr. Chairman. CHAIP24AN DAVIS: I think -- Mlq. OATES: ~4r. Chairman, I have a question I think needs to bE answered. It seems to me if we're amending this and taking out "prepared by," no longer being in there, then we are flying, it seems to me, in the face of the actual Department of Professional Regulation Landscape Architecture Chapter, which very clearly, down under 481.321(3), it says, "no registered landscape architect shall affix or permit to be affixed his seal or n~ne to any plan, specification, drawing," and so . on and so forth, if it hasn't been done and was not reviewed approved~ and modified by him. I don't think we can take "prepared by" out, in my opinion. MR. NELSON: I agree. ~R. YORK: Then we say reviewed. ~.. NELSON: It doesn't say that, Ed. In other words, I can read also. And if in fact, it said what you thought, they would have the word "and" in there after, "and which was not approved, reviewed and modified." But it says "or", "or which was not reviewed, approved or modified and adopted by him as his own work." And that clearly indicates that they can take another's work and approve it, review it, and adopt it as their own. MR. OATES: ! tell you, if I was a landscape architect, I sure wouldn't want to do that, take somebody else's work and -- MR. NELSON: But it opens the door for someone like Mr. Pelletier to prepare a very good landscape design, and to take it to a landscape architect and have his seal put on it. In other words it seems to be a nice middle ground. ' I, in my former life, did an awful lot of licensing, product ~icensing and acquisition work, and ! can write a contract better than ~aost lawyers, but that doesn't mean I should be doing it. But if I take a contract, that is adequate in every way, to a lawyer and let him review it, in all cases, they'll say this is fine, there's nothinq wrong with this, or they'll make some'changes. MR. ~47JLHERE: I would just add that I think if you were to ask some of the landscape architecture firms, they probably have individuals who are working for them, who may or may not be studying 5o become a registered landscape architect, who do preliminary design : on plans under %he supe~;±sion and review of landscape architects. MR. OATES: But that's a horse~of another garage. ~,. b~LHERE: Wel , - think that's -- from my reading, I think that'.~ exactly what that permits. ~L~. PEDONE: What was that? CHAIRPLA/q DAVIS: Mr. York? MR. YORK: Would it make everybody more comfortable if, instead of just saying "signed and sealed", say "reviewed, signed and sealed"? Page 32 16G 1 November 13, 1997 MR. OATES: "Prepared or reviewed or been signed and sealed." MR. PEDONE: It allows you to review -- ~R. OATES: It allows you to review, and sorry, Rich, I didn't go on far enough. But "prepared or reviewed" and "signed and sealed."i~ MR. PEDONE: So Ms. Student, do we, as an uncharted county, also have to abide by the State ordinances; right? We can't -- MS. STUDENT: State statutes. ~R. PEDONE: State statutes. We can't change that? MS. STUDENT: That's correct. MR. PEDONE: So in the 481.329, where it says that, this part,,~. part 3, shall not be deemed to prohibit any person from making any ~ plans, drawings or specifications for any real or personal property owned by him as long as he does not use the title, term or designation landscape architect. Wouldn't that allow Mr. Pelletier to do his own? MS. STUDENT: It could, and that's an anomalous situation. And we think -- I talked to the County Attorney about this -- and we think the law is fuzzy on this point, but we think -- ~ MR. PEDONE: How could that be fuzzy? It's in black and white':' MS. STUDENT: Because -- ~ ~fR. PEDONE: I mean, I'm not an attorney, but I can read that, too. MS. STUDENT: Well, you can read it to mean if you're an individual and it was a situation similar to Mr. Pelletier0s, but extending that out and you owned -- say you owned an industrial park and you were going to lease it, and you are an individual, then you could prepare your landscape plan. ~ ~R. PEDONE: According to this, you can. MS. STUDENT: And I don't think that's what the Legislature :~i intended. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I think -- but Mike, doesn't that boil down to a legal issue that our County Attorney and his staff have to answer for us? MiR. PEDONE: He may have to. But what I'm trying to say is that if we have to adhere to the -- MS. STUDENT: I need to tell you that -- ~R. PEDONE: -- State ordinance or State Legislature, then stopping Mr. Pellet!er from doing his own landscaping was not proper. And also, stopping an owner, if you put up a building'and you want to do your own landscaping, according to this, you're allowed to do that. So how can we make an ordinance that says you can t? , know. ' I don t MS. STUDENT: Well, let me read you -- MR. PEDONE: Wha~ I'm trying to do is make sure we don't do something contrail to the State. MS. STUDENT: if i may, let me read you another principle of ~ statutory construction. ~, "It is fundamental, however, that departure from the literal construction of a statute is justified if it would produce an absurd and unjust result and would clearly be inconsistent with the purposes and policies of the act in question." Page 33 November 13, 1997 So you have to ask yourself why we have ~he Landscape Arcki%ecture Act, and the purposes for the public health, safety and welfare concerns, which include aesthetics. So when you have a situation, you know, with people or -- excuse me -- with industrial and commercial land that are generally not o'~ned by an individual, they're generally o~ed by a corporation and a corporation can't prepare its own landscape plan unless that corporation is like Wilson Miller, or something like that, or that's owned by a land trust. But generally, commercial, industrial property, even multi-family where you have an apartment, they are ail owned by corporations, and the reason is because they want to limit their liability because of the nature of their business. It is an anomalous situation where you have an individual that owns property with that type of use. And that's why, in our opinion, we think the Legislature meant the single family person or the mobile home or the duplex such as we have in our code. F~ow, I can't tell you that that's what the Legislature meant. I'm just saying that you could make that argument because the situation is an anomalous one. And I don't even know if we could ~e~ the legislative intent on it. I have tried to call the attorney f~r the landscape architects to find out what this meant, and if they can give us some guidance. The Legislature's in session, I believe and!l the man has not called back. ' But I just offer ~haz principle of statutory construction, and there is some good reasons, as I have stated earlier, for the situation where there's a commercial or industrial piece, or any kind of property where tke land use is such where lots of individuals enter on that property on a daily basis, as distinguished from your private residence. And there are concerns about at the points of ingress and egress which function like an intersection the sight distance and whether the planzings are going to interfere with that as I'm told by staff. , And aesthetics, ~nd there's going to be a greater impact on landscaping and aesthe[ics from my experience as an attorney working in ~he area ~)f land use and zoning on commercial, industrial or multi-family tract than [here is going to be in a single family tract. So these are all reasons I offer. Now, you know, I think it's broad enough where legally, if you wanted to construe'it the other w~y and take ix, i think you possibly could. But I think there's support for what we currently have in our code, also. CHAIrmAN DAVIS: Mr. Priddy? MR. ~JLHERE: ~ay I add just very, very briefly I just have on~ thing. , E ly consideration we have -- and, you know, maybe i'm completely off base here -- but again, the issue is taking~ that position, we would open it up to any property owner designing al landscape plan. And that is my concern, that, you know, I certainly~ don't support that. So the ~uestion ~s again, can we legally take a more stringent Page 34 November 13, 1997 ~ position, and apparently we can, and that's what the staff recommends. MS. STUDENT: Well, I'm saying that, you know, if we were challenged on it I can't tell you that we'd prevail. I can tell you you can read the law the one way, where anybody, as long as they own it as an individual can do it; or you can read into it .... CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Interpretation. MS. STUDENT: -- because of all these other concerns and because of the possible illogic of it that you could construe it to mean as we have in ~he code already, with the exemption we provide for the single family, duple× and mobile home owner. And a court of law, quite frankly, would have to tell us that. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Right. MIR. ~I3LHERE: But 14r. Pelletier's position that he brought up was one of nurserymen -- MS. STUDENT: Right. MR. ~4ULHERE: -- and the exemption therein. I~S. STUDENT: That's a different exemption. C~I~iAN DAVIS: Okay. Mr. Priddy. ~,. PRIDDY: ~r. Davis, I'd only ask that we have staff put this on their list of things when we change the Immokalee Master Plan, t~at this may, in fact, be something that we need to do different in Immokalee, and, you know. CHAIRM~A~ DAVIS: Yes. Once again, it's pointed out, Mr. Priddy. MR. PRIDDY: Yes. Most of the businesses and lands in the urban area may be ov~ed by corporations, but I think you'd find that quite different in Immokalee. We have a lot of individuals that own -- ~R. YORK: ~4r. Chairman? CHAIP~.; DAVIS: We're reminded once again that Immokalee is sometimes a different thing. Mr. York? ~R. YORK: Mr. Chairman, it appears that looking at the statute, that just to have somebody sign on a set of plans is not -- and we can go on with this all night long. My suggestion is we direct staff to insert, "to be reviewed, signed and sealed by a landscape architect." [4R. PEDONE: I think you need "prepared or reviewed." !z~. YORK: We don't care who prepares it. MR. OATES: Prepared or reviewed. MR. YORK: This gives gentlemen like Mr. Pelletier, who has friends in the business, an opportunity for a small f~e to have him~ review it. They don t necessarily have to prepare it. We don't care who prepares it. ~R. OATES: You can easily put it in there: be prepared or reviewed, and signed and sealed. It says "or", doesn't say "both."i I disagree with you, Don, on that. I4R. ~.~LHERE: I'll do whatever your pleasure is. C~I~J~N DAVIS: Well, we need to come to some consensus on this Mr. Nelson, you got a -- ' MR. ~;ELSON: i agree with Ed. I don't think adding the word "prepared or" is anything different than what Don wants. I think it's the same. Page 35 16G 1 November 13, 1997 ~R. ?EDO~E: I happen to agree with :~r. Oates, also. :4R. ::ELSON: Yes, ~t ',.:orks fine. CF~IP!<A/~ DAVIS: So in other words, you're saying for us to recommend the change as submitted by staff? MR. I{ULHERE: Including inserting the phrase "or reviewed". SQ that it would be "prepared or reviewed" and "signed and sealed." ," ~R. OATES: Right. MR. YORK: That's it. MR. PEDONE: And then I think that if they ever come up with some licensing landscape designers, then we would review this again. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: So there's some level of confidence of -- [~R. PRIDDY: Second. CHAIPd~AN DAVIS: -- of standardabi!ity? (Laughter.) CHAI~N DAVIS: Is there anyone here that objects to that direction to staff? Okay. ~4S. STUDE~;T: We don't vote on this until the next time. CF~I~.N DAVIS: Right. But we've given staff direction for that change. MR. ~4ULHERE: Will do. MR. ~ELSON: All that for that? MR. ~{ULHERE: Next amendment is found on page 32. The next several amendments are of minor changes -- for the most part, minor!; changes to the sign ordinance, Division 2.5 of the Land Development Code. ~ost of them are simply grammatical corrections, and the like. There is one which changes the height for flagpoles. On page 32, the bottom half of tha~ paragraph, states that there is language that was contained in the code which allows flagpoles in all other zoning, districts other than estates and residential zoned lots, not to exceed 80 feet in height. We believe that that was a typographical error. It seems a little higher than we ever intended for a flagpole to be. The s~aff's recommendation is to change that to 35 feet. I know ~here may be a little discussion on that. C~\I~fJLN DAVIS: I'd like to make a point on this. I've had a discussion with [4r. Badamtchian, and as I went through this and Mr. ~4ulhere and I had talked about this sometime ago, because I had always felt like 80 feet was just way too tall, and made the'suggestion tha~ it be reduced to 50 feet. But to keep it consistent, on the firs: line where it says duplex -- single family or duplex lot, flagpoles should not exceed 20 feet I'd recommend that that read 30 feet. ' And on do'~rn on llne 5 states, agricultural or conservation districts, they not exceed 25 feet; have that read 35 feet. And theh the last one, which is changed from 80 to 35, have that be 50 feet. MR. 'fORK: You got some flagpoles laying around? (Laughter.) MR. OATES: Yes, you got a bunch of flag poles here? CHAIR~ DAVIS: I'll make that point. I'm not going to -- in our second hearing, I'm not going to vote on this issue, because Page 36 November 13, 1997 flagpoles is a part of the business I'm in, but I think I can make an educated observation. And the rationale is that, in the single family or duplex lots,' 20 fee~ is not tall enough to keep a flagpole in scale with a two-story home, and we are seeing more and more two-story homes And 30 feet is not excessive. · When you get into the estates, agricultural, conservation districts, you sometimes are going to have larger buildings, so once again, another 5 feet makes sense. But in the commercial areas, I see no reason for us to have flagpoles higher than 50 feet. There's a second part to this, and something that staff might want to consider for a future code change is, I think, more --what some people may find more offensive is the extremely large flags that are flown on flagpoles. The City of Naples is currently considering a limitation on flags on poles to the length of the flag being no more than 30 percent of the height of the pole. ~4ost veterans' organizations will tell you that flag etiquette dictates it's no more than 25 percent. But 30 percent, that extra 5' percen~ giving people a little flexibility if they want to fly just a little larger flag. ~R. YORK: I'd support that. I'd support your recommendation. ~R. NELSON: And 50 feet is your number? M~R. ~ULHERE: Is there any consideration for not allowing the flagpole -- for making the 50 foot a maximum, but not having it exceed the height of the building? ~R. YORK: I would tell you -- MR. PEDONE: Ycu should have to exceed the height a little bit How does it get the wind to look so good? ' MR. %J~RAGE: I was going to say, I think 35 feet is awfully short. Being a veteran, I like to see that flag, myself. MR. ~ULHERE: I have no problem with that. ~q. YORK: So the numbers are 30, 35 and 50. I~R. PEDONE: ?retry unpatriotic, Bob. ~R. I~'LHERE: No, no. I'm with you. CHAI?I~AN DAVIS: Well, it's just Veteran's Day the other day. Good point. MR. YOEK: ~ike, would you want to incorporate the size of the flag into the ordinance? , CHAIR/WA/~ DAVIS: I throw the thought out -- MR. YORK: I think it s a great idea, because some of those are hideous. The flag is not hideous, don't get me wrong. MR. MULHERE: What you're saying is that the length of the flag not exceed 30 percent of height of the pole. Did I get that correct? MR. YORK: Right. MR. NELSON: Exactly right on that. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yes. ~q. :4ULHERE: That's not a problem. We will take care of that and bring it forward in -- CHAIP~AN DAVIS: -- a i2-foot flag and a 50-foot pole (Laughter.) · Page 37 16G 1 November 13, 1997 ~R. I4ULHERE: The rest of the amendments, I think, are very minor, really. Getting a little more housekeeping as it relates to the sign section. And then we get into several amendments, starting on page 37, which Mr. Kuck is patiently waiting here to possibly discuss, and I am going to turn over the podium to Mr. Kuck with respect to these, and I understand there are a couple of gentlemen who have some questions on one of those. CHAIRbtAN DAVIS: Mr. Mulhere, on page 36, line two, where it says, "the name of five or more persons." I~R. MULHERE: Yes. CHAIRMA/~ DAVIS: I think if that's read "independent businesses?', it would be consistent with the terra where it's used elsewhere in this amendment. MR. ~MULHERE: Chahram mentioned that to me, and I agree with you. CHAIPdV~AN DAVIS: Just as a matter of consistency. ~42R. OATES: Mr. Chairman, why don't we see what these gentlemen have a problem with. CHAIRPIA~ DAVIS: Yeah, that sounds like a great idea. MR. OATES: Rather than -- Tom, I know, has his presentation p~epared, and it will take three or four hours, but -- MR. KUCK: Yeah, been working for days on it. CHAIRFu'~N DAVIS: Yes, and we have it in front of us, and unlesS, Mr. Kuck, there's a change to it -- MR. KUCK: For the record, Tom Kuck0 Engineering Plan Review Manager. Did you want me to gD through each one of these? MR. OATES: No, I just thought maybe you'd report where they have their problem. ~R. BRUET: %'~y don't we get into what these gentlemen want to talk about, whatever that is? CHAIRM_A/~ DAVIS: We've had it, we've had time to review it, ToTM. And unless you have a change to what you're proposing here. ~4R. KUCK: I have no changes on any of them that we're proposing. MR. OATES: Better find out what their problem is. CHAIRb~AN DAVIS: With that, we'd welcome the public speakers, all two of you. If you could state your name for the record, please. MR. DARLING: My name is Don Darling. I represent Florida RocW Industries. And I know it's late and thank you for your patience. First of all, let me say that I or Florida Rock is not against ~ addressing the problem. I'm not here to in any way suggest that. I have been in the lime rock mining business for more years than I want to a~mit to, over half my life. I've done all of these things or as the young people say now, been there, done that. I know the technical side of the mining. My concern is the way that the scale distance is used. C}~I~A~N DAVIS: Okay. MR. OATES: .Which one is that? MR. DARLING: That is -- MR. KUCK: It's on page 39. Page 3 8 16G 1 November 13, 1997 MR. DARLING: Let me say at the moment that our operation here in Collier County is not effected. It could very well be in the future..i Even though I don't have a problem, the -- apparently, parts of this was taken from a Dade County -- MR. KUCK: Dade and Broward County, both. MR. DARLING: And i~ definitely was put in there to address specific problems, and of course, you know Dade County's got plenty of those. I've been over there and done some of that, too. There's a federal standard on scale distance for determining vibrations of blasting to the nearest -- in this case, you're trying to address residence, although your definition says "structure". And I went and looked and saw what structure is in this kind of thing. Dade County put 150 where the vector standard is from 50 to 65, but they did it for a reason. The blasting that they are concerned with is in the urban development boundary and it says all through there "within." And of course rock mining is usually on the outside of. ' MR. OATES: Going to be what, sir? MR. DARLING: Within the urban development boundary. MR. OATES: Okay. Sorry. I~R. DARLING: b~ow, people who have to blast within the urban development boundary, really probably are not rock mining people. That might be the county, it might be construction people. It's when you have to put down utilities or sewer lines or pipelines, sometimes you have to blast to put down a power pole. And on those occasions, I you're very near homes. There's definitely a reason. A scale distance for a quarry for shooting a single hole, only one hole in a delay period, could kick in the effects of this requiremen~ up to a half a mile away, even if there was not a problem. And what that means ~o me is that we go out to any structure, as structure was defined, unless you've narrowed the scope of it. Let's see what's ..... structure" at the present time, in your ordinance in Collier County, shall mean "any constructed or erected fixture whicl~ needs to be located on the ground." And it goes on to say most everything which is fixed to the ground, with one exception, which is, for the purpose of this ordinance, fences, gates and posts are not to be interpreted as a structure. But everything else; could be a shed or a barn or. you know, an unoccupied building. To me, if you go in and have a P.E. or engineer do an inspection on a building or a struc%ure, even if you narrowly focused it, you are inspecting it at a point in time. It's just like a photograph as what it was then, today or whenever that was. Time passes, they wea~ ~he foundations settle, things that may not have been built just right, they begin to show up, and you've inspected it early on in its life, those things show up. They were not in the previous inspections, so who is responsibl~ Has :he counuy taken the responsibility to assure that if it's i' .inspected and if the blasting meets this requirement, then someone should go then and fix it? You know, where does it go from here? And all I want to say is focus and address the problem. Page 39 16G 1 November 13, 1997 Obviously, you have a problem. Give the planning services the authority, like Dade County did, extend to them that they can put special standards on a problem area, they can -- another thing that you have in here is to set a standard of .52 particle velocity. We can live with that, too. Mow, if there's a real problem, Dade County put in their code that the department can lower it down to .1. They can call for inspections and they can have seismographs. They can find the problem and address it. ~4R. KUCK: They're a little more stringent than what we have here. Again, the reason we are proposing these ~mendments to the LDC, is that in the urban area we've received numerous complaints. And we feel by requiring the pre-blast surveys, it's going to be an advantage to the residents of the area. And I realize with rock quarries, it's a little bit different, but in the case of Florida Rock, and I know that there was some concern in using this formula, what it would involve, like Florida Rock, and they do use up to 400, 450 pounds per charge; and plug this into the formula, they would be required to get pre-blast surveys within a radius or within a distance of 3,000 feet. ~R. DARLING: I calculated one recently of 2,700 feet. ~&R. KUCK: Yes, and, you know, I'm just saying, well -- ~4R. DARLING: And that's routine. b~. KUCK: -- if it's 400 pounds, using the square root is 20 times the 150. M~. DARLING: One other thing that Dade County had put in there was that if homes are going to be built in an area such as that, it,s in the county's regulations that the builder or the real estate per~on notify the home buyer that a rock quarry that does blasting is within two miles, and that is the law. Before a building permit is issued or a contract is signed, it must be done. And that's, you know, proactive. That's ~ying to head off the problem. ~R. PRiDDY: Would we solve part of this by saying outside of the urban -- or inside the urban boundary is one distance and outside the other? ' MR. KUCK: You would still have to come up with a formula for outside the ~:rban area. And you get borderline cases, and you know, I'm very familiar because I also was in the rock busihess for five years in Collier County. But like Florida Rock in their situation, they are using 400, 450 pounds per charge, so they come up with a distance of 3,000 feet Better Roads, Willow Run quarry, and APAC, in some of their blasting they use 60 pounds. So plugging it into their formula, they would need a survey within maybe a ~housand, 1,200 feet. So that's what the difference is. I guess it's where you draw the line. Sometimes your urban area does butt right up against the rural area. MR. BRUET: i would think with our urban area expanding so fas~, that every year you are going to have more and more and more calls with respect to damage, and to nuisance calls. Page 40 , November 13, 1997 MR. KUCK: We feel that there is a definite advantage of getting these surveyed so the people are aware there's blasting going on, and their property is surveyed. So then when they call the county and say we've got damages, then it might be a civil matter between the blaster and the property owner. One other thing I would like to mention, I did submit these proposed amendments to the two blasting contractors in this county, Doug Watham (phonetic) with Alico of Florida, Inc., and Roy Simmons! with Florida Energ~f Services, Inc., and they had no problem with th~m, and I also submitted them to Warren Sebastian with Vibration EnergyI Services, Inc., which does a lot of seismographs, and they were -- at least, he was in favor, and even some of the recommendations that I used came from his office or from his company. But I also am aware that there may be some situations, if you have a quar~t, you P~ow, 20 miles out from 951. But by the same token HR. DARLING: it's actually about 18 miles out from 951. (Laughter.) MR. KUCK: By the same token, if you do have, how many residents are you going to have within 3,000 feet? MR. PRIDDY: But do I want him coming to inspect my house every couple days? I've got another question. The more restrictive we make this, the more likely it is that he's going to want to move further out. MR. KUCK: Well, it's either that or, in the case of Florida Rock, they may look at reducing their poundage. And in their case, I did look at the aerial of Collier County where you're located, and I think that you would probably have abou~ six or eight homes that you would require a survey at that particular location. MR. PRIDDY: Are you talking about 14ule Pen or at mine in Sunniland? MR. KUCK: i'm talking about Hule Pen. HR. ?RIDDY: Okay. ~R. KUCK: Over in Immokalee, I'm not sure if you have a few ranches within, you know, half a mile or 2,000 feet, but it would be very minor, i know where it's located, but I did not look at the aerial of the -- MR. PEDOME: Having lived in Kings Lake when Better Roads was blasting lots of weeds, and having had my slab crack down the middl~ andrestrictions watch the on crack blasting, go up the side of the house, I'm all for (Laughter.) MR. BRUET: I think it's a problem you need to address as growth ~oes on. I think you need to be more stringent every year. MR. KUCK: This is a start, and there are some other things that we'll be looking at as years go by. But we've been somewhat lax. Before, it was just really the option of the blaster on surveys, which really didn't have any meaning. MR. PRIDDY: Mr. Chairman, I need to let the record reflect that Page 41 16G I November 13, 1997 when we actually take a vote on this that I need not to vote on this, since i actually o',~ the land that Mr. Darling has a quarry on, though I'm not fortunate enough to receive the income off of it at this point. CHAIRYJklW DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. Priddy. t~R. WRAGE: Just a question, and obviously, I'm fairly ignorant~ of blasting. My neighbor swears that her dog got sterilized because of blasting, but -- (Laughter.) MR. 5'~RAGE: -- on the surveys how far back -- I heard the gentleman say something about old surveys. Is there no time limit on surveys? ~4R. KUCK: Most of these are occurring with the development. Most of the blasting is where they are putting in the lakes, and the blasting occurs usually within a few months' time frame, and some ~ larger developments may be over several years. So when they do the pre-blast survey, it would be initially when they are starting to do the blasting. I would think that if it goes. on for several years, it may be that you would want to get -- ~ MR. %'rRAGE: But there is no limit? v' MR. KUCK: -- some new surveys. And in the case of a rock quarry, where it may go on for 8, 10, 12, 15 or 20 years -- MR. DARLING: Or 30 or 40. '~ MR. KUCK: -- I would think it would be to their advantage, .' instead of getting the surveys made this year, and assuming that no natural settlement occurred over the next 15 years, it may be to their benefit to do surve~,s on a 5-year basis, or something like that. ~ YfR. WRAGE: But there is no limit, though. ~. MR. KUCK: No. MR. PRIDDY: Mr. Darling, how much longer do y'all anticipate being in the Mule Pen area with blasting? MR. DARLING: I think we have enough reserves with the rock that's out there in the ground to be there probably 15, 20 years, if we do go ahead and mine it all out. One other -- I hate to drag this out -- but one other thing that all of you must know -- I know Mr. Kuck does; I just heard him ~ reference it. Any house built here in this area is going to be built on fill, sometimes a lot of fill. And I'm dealing wi~h a similar situation over on the other side of the state now, where they crush i~p rock and put it on the ground and put top soil on top of it. And when you compact that, the very best you can do is six or eight inches ori: so. It's compacted very well. What's underneath it is not very wei!l compacted, i! Now, our water table rises and falls with the wet season and dry season. ~d after a period of time, there will be some uneven settling. Maybe the corner will settle a little more than the other part of the structure. They are mostly all made out of concrete block on a slab. And when it settles, one corner settles, you're going to' see this zigzag crack. And if there's a quarry around, it's the quarry that did it. Page 42 i 16G I ' November 13, 1997 Bu~ there's so many of them that have this zigzag crack in the block, that usually runs up to a corner. There is no quarry there, and, you know, I've seen all of those, too. We of course, can inspect them and, you know, do the engineering studies and all. But as time goes by, those that are Drone to do that, that's going to happen, and what do we do? MIR. KUCK: I know, because I get called out on blasting complaints, and I'm well aware a lot of them are just caused by natural causes. ~R. DARLING: I suppose I brought you more problems than I help%d you to address. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Is there anything else you wanted to point ou~ in the other pages concerning ~4r. Kuck°s proposed changes? MIR. DARLIMG: ?;ell, like I said before, well, one of the things was the one million dollar insurance. MR. KUCK: Yes. ~R. DARLI~;G: As a large company, we can handle it. Maybe I should thank you for cutting the small guys out, but a lot of them can ' t. MR. KUCK: ~;o. It's not a problem with the blasters. Most ef them car~t -- like I know Alico of Florida, I believe they carry at leas~ five million or something. But we just thought that the 500,000, you know, that ca3ne from years back, and it's just a little bit low. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: it's called inflation. MR. KUCK: And there is sometimes, in certain cases, a big element of risk involved with the blasting. MR. YORK: In today's economy, it wouldn't mean that much. MR. DARLING: If you are really looking to address scale distance doesn't do it. CHAI?3DIN DAVIS: Pardon? ~R. DARLIb;G: Scale distance as a means of trying to address the problem, really, that's so outdated. If you really have a problem, you've got Jo go there with some up-to-date seismic, and get the particle velocity, the hertz, you got to measure air over pressure. Your blasting people that you just mentioned, they know the areas in which it causes damage to a house and at what levels. And if '/ou really want to address the problem, y6u got to get technical. I~R. KUCK: That's right, and not blast on cloudy days. ~R. DARLING: That, too. CHAI~H~ DAVIS: Okay. Thank you. Did you want to speak, sir? MR. SHEPPARD: I've just got one question. My name is Ralph Sheppard. I'm with Southern Sand & Stone, which used to be Better Roads. On the second, the (b) item which would trigger a pre-blast inspection, you say for all types of blasting shall be required within 300 feet of the blasting perimeter. Would you define what you mean by blasting perimeter? MR. KUCK: That would be, I guess if you're looking at a trench Page 43 16G 1 November 13, 1997 excavation or something else within 300 feet of actually where that blasting is occurring. If you're blasting here, the 300 feet would measured from that distance out. MR. SHEPPARD: Anything beyond 300 feet from where you're blasting; is that another way? MR. KUCK: You would be required at a minimum, that if you're anything within that distance to where you're blasting to 300 feet .out. MR. YORK: Is that a 300-foot radius circle? MR. KUCK: Yes. MR. YORK: Does that answer it? ~R. SHEPPARD: Not really. ~&R. YORK: Well, here's the blasting point; 300 feet in a circle all the way around. MR. SHEPPARD: It would trigger an inspection on (a), which would be the weighted distance and (b) -- MR. KUCK: ~at page are you on? I'm trying to track with you. MR. BRUET: 39 and 40. ~R. SHEPPARD: Yes, under (b), top of page 40. I<R. KUCK: Okay, I follow you. ~R. SHEPPARD: I just don't know quite where you're coming from~ MR. KUCK: Okay. ~%at we're saying is that you use the scale distance, but in all cases you would require pre-blasting surveys if you're within 300 feet of the blasting. In other words, when you use that formula, if you reduce the weight of the charge down small enough, you can come up with a distance less than 300 feet. MR. SHEPPARD: To me, I read this as this has nothing to do with scale distance. This is the second -- MR. KUCK: It doesn't. The scale distance is one -- M2~.. SHEPPARD: One, yes. MR. KUCK: -- one, that covers most cases. But we're coming along and saying that, again, if you used one pound in your scale distance formula, you'd come up with 150 feet. We're saying in all cases, you have to have surveys within the 300 feet. MR. YORK: Minimum. MR. OATES: Minimum, right. MR. SHEPPARD: Okay. Thank you. ' CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Anything else? Any other questions? I think,ii: if I can read names correctly, you were the last hitter tonight, right? Last at bat? MR. KUCK: Yes. MR. OATES: He didn't strike out. CHAIRF2~N DAVIS: With that, we've given staff direction on several issues. And you've heard our next meeting, as it's advertised, here in the board room. With that, we'll -- ~.. OATES: As you know, I won't be here for that. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: We'll certainly miss you, Mr. Oates. Adjourn this meetinq. Page 44 16G 1 November 13, 1997 There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 7:15 p.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MICHAEL A. DAVIS, Chairman These minutes approved by the Board on presented or as corrected TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING BY: Gray, RPR as Kaye Page 45 16G 1 AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY, JANUARY 15, 1998 IN TIlE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER. 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE.~ANY PERSON WHO DECIDED TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE. WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. THESE MATERIALS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. ROLL CALL BY CLERK o 3. 4. 5. 6. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES: PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES: BCC REPORT CHAIRMAN'S REPORT t,';isc. Cortes: Cc,?ss TO: , Nor r i 5 Hancock Constantine Berr~ ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. Petition No. BD-97-27, Miles L. Scofield, representing Richard A. Schmidt requesting a 5 foot boat dock extension to alto~ for a 25 foot boat dock and boat lift for property located at 237 Bayfront Drive, further described as Lot 13. Bayfront Gardens, in Section 6, Township 48 South, Range 25 East. (Coordina, tor: Fred Reischl) i' B. Petition No. PDI-97-8, Brace Tyson, AICP, of Wilson, Miller. Barton & Peek, Inc., representing CFS-I Pavilion Ltd., requesting an insubstantial change determination to the Pavilion Shopping Center PUD Master Plan by creating an out'parcel for property located in the northwest quadrant of Vanderbilt Beach Road {C.R. 862) and Tamiami Trail North (U.S. 41 }, in Section 33, Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier Courtly, Florida. (Coordinator: Ray Bellows} D. Petmon N'o. PUD-97-12. William L. lloover. AICP. of Hoover Planning Shoppe and Beau Kcene. P.E.. of Green. Keene & Erek. Inc., representing Frank Clesen & Sons. Inc., requesting a rezone from "E" Estates· to "PUD" to be known as Clesen PUD for commercial uses, for property located on the north side of Pine RiSge Road ~CR. 8961. '/. mile east of the intersection of Pine Ridge Road (C.R. 896) and Whippoorwill Lanel in Section 7. Township 49 South. Range 26 East. consisting of 4.33 acres, more or less. (Coordinator: Br~an Nhlk) Pctitiun No. PUD-83-17¢I), Community Development and Environmental Services Division representing the Board of County Commissioners requesting an amendment to the Ford Motor Company Vehicle Evaluation Center PUD for the purpose of permi~in§ testing of all types of motor vehicles and permittih~g a communication tower for property located north of Alligator Alley (I-75) and east of Golden Gate Estate~ in Sections 22, 27 and 3~,. Township 49 South. Range 28 East. Collier County. Florida. consisting of 53~.37 acres, more or less. (Coordinator: Wayne Arnold) Petition No. PUD-g7-31(3), Timothy W, Ferguson and Dominic Gadaleta representing SJG Land Trust. requesting a rezone from "PUD" to "PUD" for the Planned Unit Development known as Gadaleta. havin~ the effect of amending the Gadaleta PUD in response to requirements of Section 2.7,3.4 of the L~nd Development Code. Resolution 97-134. for proper~ located on the west side of Old Tamiami Trail North. Old US. 41 North (C.R. 867) and immediately contiguous the Lee County boundary line in Section I0, Township ag South. Range 26 East. Collier County, Florida, containing 19.3 acres, more or 17~ss. (Coordinator: Ron Nmo} (Continued to the Meet,ng of February 5, 1998) Petmon No. PUD-97-16, MeAnly Engineering & Design, Inc., representing Toll Brothers, Inc.. requesting a rezone from "PUD" (Casa Del Sol Gulf& Country Club) and "A" to "PUD" Planned Unit Development to be known as Naples fore.¢,t Country Club for a mixed use community consisting of no greater then 785 mixed resMeniial dwelling units: golf course, clubhouse and related recreational amenities; and 150,000 square }'eel of commercial floor space for property located at the northwest quadrant of C.R. 951 and Rattlesnake- Hammock Road (C.R. 864) in Section 15, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, CoI1ier County. Flo/ida containing 485 acres, more or less, (Coordinator: Ron Nino) ~ ' Petition No, PUD-97-18, Karen Bishop of ProJect Management Services Inc., representing Signa~re Communmes. Inc., requesting a rezone from RMF-6. RMF-12. RMFI2ST and RMF-16 to PUD to' be known as \Viggms Pass Landings Planned Unit Development for a maximum of 531 multi-family dwelling umt.s, located on the northwest comer of 111:" Avenue North (Bluebill Avenue - also known as C.R, 846) and Vanderbilt Drive (C.R. 901), further described as Lots 1 thru I0, Block i, all of Block 2 and Lots i thru 16, Block 3. Wiggins Pass Landings Unit nl, and Lots I thru 4. Block I, Wiggins Pass landings Unit'#1. ,.\d~lition. in Section 20, Township 48 South. Range 25 East, consisting of 88.5 acres, more or less. (Coordinator: Ron Nino) H. Petition No. PDI-97-7, Barbara H. Cawley, AICP, of Wilson, Miller. Barton & Peek. Inc., represenltjng Grey Oaks Development Corporation. requesting an insubstantial change determination to the Grey Ohks PUD by revising the Master Plan to move nine holes of a golf course from the southeast quadrant to: the northwest quadrant of the project, in Section 25. Township 49 South, Range 25 East. (Coordinator: Ron Nino} (Continued Indefinite) Petition No. PUD-84-7(6), George L. Vamadoe of Young, vanAssenderp & Vamadoe. P.A.. representing D Y Assocmes Joint Venture, a Florida General Partnership. for a rezone from "PUD" Planned Unil Development and "A' Rural Agricultural to "PUD" Planned Unit Development. having the effec~ of amend,ng the Fiddler's Creek portion of the Marco Shores PUD and adding 1,385 acres thereto ~hile holding constant the currently authorized number of dwelling units, namely 6,000 for the fiddler's Creek portion of the Marco Shores PUD lying in Sections 13. 14, 15, 22, 23 and 24, Township 51 South. Range~ 26 East and Sections 18, 19 and 29, Township 51 South. Range 27 East. Collier County, Florida. consisting of 3.763.99 acres, more or less. (Coordinator: Ron Nino) (Companion to DOA-97-3) (Continued to the Meeting of February 5, 1998) 16G i Petition No. DOA-97-3, George L. Vamadoe of Young, vanAssenderp & Vamadoe, P.A., representing DY Associates Joint Venture. a Florida General Partnership, for an amendment to the Marco Shores/Fiddler's Creek Development Order 84-3, as amended for the purpose of adding 1,355 acres Io the Fiddler's Creek portion of said development order, and companion Planned Unit Development zoning regulation, and~to adopt a new Master Plan for said added area while leaving constant the currently authorized number of dwellLng units, namely 6,000 for the Fiddler's Creek portion of Marco Shores, said additional land area is located in Section 18, 19 and 29, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. (Coordinator: Ron Nino) (Companion to PUD-84-7(6)) (Continued to February 5, 1998) o 9. 10. 11. OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA ADJOURN I/I 5/98 CCPC AGENDA/md 3 County Government l'roductivilv Committee Mccting Minulcs Nm'cmbcr 19, 1997, 9:3(} A.M. ,Members Present Jack McKenna x.. Barbara Berry Mario Delgado x Echvard Ferguson x Charles Geller x P, obert Laird x Bill Neal x I~dward Ott x Karl Otto x John Schoemer x John Stockton x Bernard Weiss x Staff Gary Vincent Guests Robert Fernandez x Mike Smykowski x 16G 1 F1ECEIVED I)EC 1997 Absent Misc. Corres: Itemff ,~. Copies To: Jack McKenna welcomed Gary Vincent who was recently appointed as the staff liaison to the t'roductivitv Corem ittee. Response to Committee Budget Report Mike Sm,/k,~wski presented a written response to the Committee's report on the budgeting process study. Mike's presentation indicated that all the recommendations were acted upon. Mike will draft a follow-up letter regarding the budget report for signature by Bill Neal and Jack McKenna. The final letter xvill be sent to the BCC. Verbatim Recording of [iCC Meetings Bob Fernandez requested that the committee consider studying the cost effectiveness and utility of doing verbatim recordings of all BCC meetings. The committee thought it would be a ,.vonhwhile study and discussed doing a cost analysis and determining how often the recordings are used A suggestion w,'ts made to test transcription software for recording the minutes. Subcotnmittee Status Reports ~ancoCk (.,>nstantine ' Jail - Thc subcommittee is still reviewing the plans for the jail expansion. Initial comments are that the .jail expansion plans should be considered ~ an integral pan of the master space plan and not separately and belbre completion of the m~ter plan. Many questions remain unanswered, most notably the increase in cost from 30 to 40 million dollars. Further discussion was deleted until afle,' the master plan consultant addresses the subcommittee on Nov 24 concerning thc timctab e fi~r completion and inco~oration of thc V-Group study. Shcrift's Overtime -The subcommittee has visited the Communication Center and the Drill Academy and is still gathering information, lnitial findings are that the Communication Center has a significant recruiting and retention problem which causes increased training time and costs. A retention bonus was suggested as a possible solution. Thc subcommittee's initial impression is that the overtime might be justified l tuman Resources - Thc st,bcommitlce needs to meet with Jennifer Edwards. Procurement l~eport Bernie Weiss reported that he had presented the committee's final report and recommendations to the Board and that Steve Camell, the Purchasing Director, has proposed a schedule for implementing the committee's recommendations. Bernie expressed concern that the schedule was not aggressive enough, tie also was concerned that the Board did not concur with the recommendation to require a two year cooling off requirement for managers. The committee's position is that there is an opportunity for improper action both before and after a manager leaves employment with the county, which leads to a public perception of dishonesty within local government. New Business Filling Vacancy - Gary Vincent distributed copies of the three applicants' resumes. A subcommittee consisting oF Ed Ferguson, Charles Geller, Robert Laird, and John Stockton was appointed to review and/or inter¥icw the applicants and make a recommendation. Newspaper Ad For Rccrvitmcnt - GaD, distributed for committee review, a proposed revision of the newspaper ad used to announce vacancies on the committee. Remainim4 Terms - Gary distributed a list of committee members indicating their term expiration date and eligibility Ibr an additional term. Nlccting ad.jomncd 11:45 a.m. The next mee6ng will be on Wednesday December 17'~, at 9:30 a.m. in the Couaty Administrator's Co,fference Room. CC. Board of County Con, missioners Ott~ce P, obert Fernandez, County Administrator 16G '1 January 15, 1998 COLLIER COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR COURTHOUSE · BLDG. C-1 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34112-4997 (941) 774-8171 C. F.C. Honorable Barbara B. Berry, Chaim~an Board of County Commissioners Collier County Courthouse - Admin. Bldg./3 Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Ms. Ben')': For your in fonnation, this date we have made a distribution of Currcnt Ad Valorem Tax and Non-Ad Valorem Assessment to the Board of County Commissioners, after Tax Collector's commissions, as follows: County Wide Dependent District Solid Waste Grand Total S5,150,024.13 1,603,982.04 38%688.00 $7,143,694.17 Attached you will find a distribution recap showing year to date totals of taxes collected net of discount for t993, 1994, 1995, 1996 and 1997. Yours respectfully submitted. M, ic~cl A. V,'cl~h, Controller C?'llicr County 'Fax Collector's Office MAW/pld cncl. CC: Hon. Timothy J. Constantine lton. 'l'imothy Hancock Hon. John Norris Hon. Pamela Mae'Kit Mr. Robert F. Fernandez, County Administrator Hon. Guy I,. Carlton, Tax Collector Mr. Claude A. Haynes, Deputy Tax Collector Mrs. Marilyn Lewis. Property Tax Dept. Director IV, isc. Corres: Date: _ I, Cop)es To: z~ > © 16G 1 Z z © > 1 ECEIVED December 19. 1997 AREA AGENCY on AGING Timothv L I lancock. ('hairman Collier County Board of County Commissioners Collier Government Complex 3301 Tamiami 'Frail F. ast Naples. Florida 330{'~2 [)car ('hairman I lancock It is my pleasure to provide you with a report of our administrative monitoring visit with ('oilier County Services For Seniors on October 28 - 29 and November 13. 1997 The administrative monitoring oFyour contract(s) with the Area Agency on Aging for Southwest Florida. Inc. is an annual requirement. The purpose ofadministrative monitoring is to provide technical assistance to project personnel with regard to contractual activity and also to ensure compliance with state and federal law. Administrative monitoring of all provider agencies is conducted in accordance with procedures contained in the Department of Eider Affairs' Administrative Monitoring instn,ment. We appreciate the cooperation of project slatl'during thc monitoring Thc records reviewed were very detailed and organized. You have an excellent staffworking for this project. We were very pleased with the cooperation and organization. If you have any questions or comments regarding this report, please contact this office Sini~ercly.. 'l'en3, '~, hire i",4,/SC. C0rres: ~ T~V/Is Constantine_ ~, , - c: ~anci Lochner, Project Director Copies To: Leigh Smith, CFO Para Fico, Program Specialist 16G 1 AREA AGENCY ON AGING FOR SOUTHIVEST FLORIDA, INC. AI)511NISTIL, VI'iVE ,~I()NITORIN(; REI'ORT l)ecember 19, 1997 GRANTEE N..\5IE: GRANTEE A I)I)R F.S.$;: (;R,\NTEE TEI,EI'IIONE: BOARI) Ol: I)IRE(7I'()RS: I*rcshlcnt/Chairm:~n I'RO.JE(?i' 1)I !~, I'](?I'OR: Collier County Services for Seniors 3301 T:::::i::mi Trail Easl. ll.ihli.~ II Naliles, i.lorida 33962 (941)774-g443 Tinmlhv !.. Il:mc,ck. C~:llier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 'Famiami Trail Easl Naples. Florida 33962 Nanci I,ochner, Project I)irector I~URPOSF~ OF VI.SIT: Annual Adnlinisll'alive ,Monilorin~ I)ATE(S) ()F \'ISlT: Oclober 28 - 29, November 13. 1997 PROVIDER I~I';PI~IF. SF.N'FATIVE(S): N:::Ici i,ochner, l'r..iecl l)ireclor John Ferrell. (;rant ACCoIIIII;Illl K :ilhy ~ch nl id l. A ceo. n lin\ l'edl il iri:i. AREA AGENCY I~,I.;I'I~,I.;SENTATIVE(S): i,ei~h Smilh, CFO 'I'm~v (;amlfino, Fiscal Spe¢ialisl CONTRACT(S): OAA O3O.97 CCE o3o.35.96 AI)I 030.25.96 16G 1 UNIT RATI£ CONTI~,ACT REVIEW CIlECKI.IST I'ROVII)ER Collier CmJnt,v Senior Service.,4 CONI'RAC'F OAA 030.97 NUMBERS CCE 030.35.96, AI)I 030.25.96 I)ATE ()clnber 28 & 29. 1997. November 13. 1997 PARTICIPANTS Nanci l.ochm, r. John Ft'rrell and Knlhy Schmidt MONITOR(S) l.eigh Smith and 'l'.u~' 1. CONI'RACT C(L'~IPI,IANCE No. .qhlndard Finrling,~/Cnmmenls I. The provider's annual linancial and  compliance audil has been pcrforme(I and received hv tt~c AAA as spccilicd in thc audit att;tchmcnl. N N/A F 2. Thc rccomn~cndalions,'f~ndings holed ()n p;Igc.5~.55 and 56 or the .single audit act, the re~rt in thc management loiter and/or au~lit reft'rs to thc "Council fi~r Human Services of Soulh Y have hccn rcsolv~xl (,cnlral Fla..Inc.. Area Agency on Aging." The correct legal name per Iht conlracl should be Area Agency on N Aging for Soulhwcsl Florida. Inc. N/A 16G 1' 3. All issues from the previous No issues were holed on Iht previous administrative adminislrativc monitoring have been moniloring reporl. Y resolved. N M F 4. All subcontracts hilvc hccll reviewed and received prior approval from  AAA. N N/A F 5. All apl)roved subcontracts ctmlain thc Subcontracts contain required clauses and provisions as required clauscs and provisions specified in the contract between Ihe AAA and Ihe  specified in th~ contracl hct~een thc provider. AAA and provider. N M N,'A F !6G 1 6. All records are rclained for a period l~k~licy .sl~lcs rccord~ are relained fl~r a peri~l of 5 years. or' 5 years. N N/A F 7. The pn~vidcr sulm]illcd ;~ currunl Thc ;tFcncy lm~vi(Icd thc rmmitt~rs wilh pr(x)f of Ccrtilica~c ~l' In~ur~u~ce l~ thc AAA insurance. In~ur;mce c~vcr;tge is from 10/01/97 Ihru  vcril'yin~ adcquu~c Ibhili~v insur;mcc I(),'l)l,'q~.Thc ~,~uncy i~ sull' insured through the C~llicr covcr~t~c. (](~tllllV (Jovcrll111¢11I. N N/A F 8. A Civil Rights Comt~liancc Questionnaire (I)OEA l:t~rms lf)l A  and B) has bccn prt~pcrly c~,mplctcd and the provider is complyin~ wi~h all federal civil rights requirements. N ~1 .,. N/A F ~ The provider is complying with Iht provisions of Chapter 119. F.S. to allow puhlic access to records. Tire provider is purchasing products or materials witil recycled c.nlcnl in accordance with Sccti(m 403.7065 and 287.045. F.5. The provider is complying with Tile provider did not have any requests for access to their records during 1997. The provider has an existing policy to address public ac'ccss to records. The provider prtwidcd lire monitors with three brochures Section 286.25. F.S. regarding si)on.st)rshi p rcq u i re mcn l s. prinlcd with AAA funding. Tire provider complied with ~l~c sponsorship requirements. Thc providcr's policy states that the provider will purcha~,c i)r.ducts ~r materials with recycled content when cost cl'l~ctivc. 16G 1 12. Thc provider is complying with Seclion 216.347. F.S. prohibiting thc r expenditure of contract funds to lobby the legislature, ii judicial branch or a state agency. N N/A F 13. The provider has properly completed The Certification Regarding l,obbying was signed anti the Certification Rc~arding [,obhying included with the pmvider's OAA contract.  if the c~ntract cor~titins federal l'tm(Is in excess of $ I00,()00, N N/A F 14. The provider has properly completed Thc provider signed a prt~perly completed Certification the Certification Regarding Regarding [)ebarmen{. Suspension. Ineligibility and  Debarment. Suspension, h~eligibility Vohmtarv Exclusitm with the OAA contract. and Voluntary Exclusion if thc contract contains federal l'tmding in N excess of' $25,000 and the pro~ 'der independent auditor completed a M Certification Regarding Debarment. SUSl)cr~sion, Ineligibility and N/A Voluntary Exclusion if required attdit COlltracts COrltilirli~lg /'calera] F funding. 15. The provider complies with tile ITR submitted and approved in June, 1997 for CCE grant Department of Eider Affairs and the ending on June 30.1997.  AAA's procedures for purchasing Information Technology Resources (ITRs). ~ N M N/A F 16. Property records are maintained All items include the required intkmnation. listing a description of thc property,  model number, serial number. funding source, calculation ~I' federal/state share, date tff N acquisition, unit cost. property inventory number, location, usc anti M condition, transtar, replacement or dispositi,n of thc property. :. N/A ;:' F 17. A complete physical inventory of property is conducted annttallv. N M N/A F fl 18. For contracls subject to fee assessment, the provider maintains r written fcc assessn~cnl, billing and collection policies. N N/A F 19. The provider maintains dctailc(I accounting records listing all clients  owing fees anti Ihe accou~l balances. N ~ N/A F 20. Fees received are recorded in The providcr's finance department cannot accomadate the accounting records as program AAAs request to place the funding in an interest bearing Y income and deposilcd Io an interest- checking account. The pr.vider has agreed to remit bearing account to provide additional xveckly remittances to AAA. The AAA will place the  program se~,ices, funds into an interest bearing account. M N/A 16G 1 21. Interest earned from advance Funds arc placed in a non-interest bearing account. payments of general revenue' funds Y arc identified anti returned to Iht AAA on a quarlcrly basis. N F 22. if unallowable ex~nditurcs were charged to Ibc conlracl(s), or thc Y provider has been overpaid. Iht provider arranged to reimburse the N AAA within 40 calendar days after either discovery by the pr.vidcr. M AAA or provider's independent auditor. F II. SYSTEMS MANAGEMENT The provider m:tintains written policies and procedures for system.~ management. Thc provider's inlbrmation Technology Resource clcpartment conducts a complete back-up annually of their data. Thc financial data is backed up daily. The provider's inlcrnal slaff is maintaining a diskettc back-up. Policies and procedures arc maintained by thc ITR department, i~ 24. Procedures arc in place to maintain All systems arc password protected. Thc system requires system security, thc passwords to be changed every 3 months. The  provider conducts an exit interview which requires the employee to release thc password l~r their system. If the password is incorrect, final checks can be held until the N password is verified. M F 25. Provider maintains a ,)'htcm for a Sec ~ 23 routine back up of dala and sol'twarc Y to recover from losses (,r (}II[;t~CS the computer svs[cm per ('haplcr 44- N 4.070. Florida ,Xdmini~tra~ivc N/A 26. The provider ;~ current on all dala Thc prox idcr C;lllllO{ enter clicnl data into the upgraded entry required for ('ticnl Inlk~rmathm. vcrhion of CIRTN fi~r intake, update waiting lists, change Y Registration and Tracking System active or inactive clients' data. Thc provider is not able tO (CIRTS). run reports to verify data. I'rovidcr's problems are due t0  thc ('IR'FS upgrade. The provider is also ex~riencing prt~hlcms with the received services screen. It apl~qrs as if thc units are not lining up properly - i.e., units entered M as 2.50 are entered on the screen as .25. The problems that tl~c provider experienced during the monitoring visit N/A have since been resolved. F 9 16G' 1 27. The provider validates data in Thc information entered into CIRTS is verified with CIRTS. rcla, rts generated bv case n'umagcrs - spreadsheets are a. lso I developed lay the accounting technician to verify information in CIRTS. N M N/A 28. The provider mainlains alternate Provider uses spread~,heets to verify data from plans for capturir~g and reporting data sul'~cot'~Iractt',rs and m:,'mal reports generated by case [if CIRTS is down for an extended managers, etc. Otherwise. all data is entered into CIRTS. period of time. N M N/A F 111. UNIT RATE TRACKIN(; 29. Units rcporled on monthly invoices IInits reporled on monthly invoices track consislently With are accurate and consistent with CIRTS. Thc only inc,nsistcncies were due to liming  CIRTS, internal tracking reports, ami ctiflkrcnccs because of different Ctlloff perils each se~icc logs. month, tlpon further review, thc inconsistencies were resolved. N M N/A F 10 3fl. Thc provider regularly mo~it~rs tmi! Weekly meetings arc held with thc Case Manager achievement levels and initiates Supcrvis~r. Accounting Technician, and Grant Accountant  correclivc action as needed. 1o review unit achievement. The Case Manager Su~isor iniliates corrective action based on the outcome of the weekly meetings. N M N/A F 31. The provider regularly mt~nitt~rs thc Quarterly reports used Io track actual versus budgeted actual cost of a unit of service, costs. Weekly meetings arc held with Nanci, Kathy and  compares the actual c~st with line J~lm. as outlined in ~30. Nanci notifies Case Managers negotiated rate. at~d initiates m~d appropri~tc sl~l'l' of changes in goals. No corrective corrective action a~ ncc(lcd. ~cli~n h;~$ been needed up till tl~i~ point. N N/A F 32. Match requirements in thc form of All malch rcquircmcmx arc being mol. cash/or in kind arc bci~g met. N N/A F II Surplus cash generated from previous contracts is tracked separately and used as program income. l'ro. ject initiated performance ba.sed contracts in 1997. No surl~lu~ cash was generated from previous year's contract. 12 AREA AGENCY ()N AGING FOR SOUTIlWEST FI,ORII)A, INC. UNIT RATE (,ONTRACT REVIEW Sli31MAI,~Y OF FINDINGS and/or C().MMENTS (;RANTEE: 12/I 9/97 I. il. Ill. (,oilier (,otmtv Services for Seniors CO N'l'l,b'~ CI' C()MI'i,IANC'E N. issut:s .f ntmc.mpliancc ,.'..'ere holed during Iht visil SYS'I'E,MS ~iANA(; ESI ENT No issues of nm~compliance were noted during the visil. UNIT i~AI'E TRACKIN(; No issues t~t' noncompliance were notecl during the visit LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMEN:I' THIS LEGAL SERVICES AGREEMENT (hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement") made and entered into this .,.~.~ day of ~'~2r~, 1998, by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, (hereinafter referred to as the "Board" and/or "County"), and GOODLETTE, COLEMAN & JOHNSON, P.A. (hereinafter referred to as the "Firm"). _WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Michael W. Pettit, an associate of the Firm, during his employment as an Assistant County Attorney to the County Attorney to the Board was principally involved and responsible to represent the Board's interests in certain "covered" and "non-covered" cases'; and WHEREAS, the County Attorney and the Collier County Risk Management Director in consultation with Willis Corroon, the County's insurance administrator, have determined that the County's interests are better served for the Firm by and through Michael W. Pettit to be approved as the attorney of record on behalf of Collier County on certain covered cases and provide professional legal services in that regard; and WHEREAS, the County Attorney and the Public Works Administrator have determined thai the County's interests are better served for the Firm by and through Michael W. Pettit to be approved as attorney of record on behalf of Collier County on certain non-covered cases and provide professional legal services in that regard. "Covered cases" are cases subject to the County's self-insured insurance program while "non-covered" cases are cases not subject to the program. 1: NOW, THEREFORE, the padies hereto,'in consideration of the premises and the covenants contained herein, mutually agree as follows: A. The Firm by and through Michael W. Pettit is hereby retained by the Board to represent the Board in all the matters relating to any court proceedings, negotiations and settlement of the following cases that are currently pending that have been filed against Collier County: 1. Kitchens v (~ollier (~ounty, Case No. 95-4852-CA-01-TB (Note: This Agreement shall only extend to those services required to defend the County's interests in all post-trial proceedings through the conclusion of all appeals as a result of the trial he!d November 18-20, 1997. In the event a new trial is ordered following the conclusion of all appeals, the parties may then negotiate an extension or modification of lhisi Agreement but shall be under no obligation to do so). 2. .E. agle Creek Propedies, Inc v Collier ~;ounty, Case No. 93-0518-CA- 01-TB. 3 Pena v. Collier County, Case No. 94-3944-CA-01-CTC. B. The Firm shall prepare all legal documents, correspondence, commun cat ohs, etc and attend all negotiation meetings, settlement conferences, court hearings and trials necessary to bring the above-listed cases to closure. C. The Board hereby agrees to pay the Firm as compensation for legal services rendered at the rate of $105.00 per hour. D. The Board hereby agrees to reimburse the Firm for actual costs incurred including costs of out-of-county travel, mailing, copies, facsimiles, telephone and document transmittal expenses (e.g., "Federal Express", et~:.) incurred pursuant to this Agreement, provided that such costs are supported by appropriate documentation submitted to the Risk Management Depadment and/or the Public Works Administrator and reviewed and approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. The use of a multiplier for these expenses/production costs is not allowed. Per diem and travel expenses will be reimbursed in accordance with Section 112.061, Florida Statutes, entitled Per Diem and Travel Expenses of Public Officers, Employees and Authorized Persons, as amended. This requirement currently includes, but is not limited to, expenses such as automobile travel expenses reimbursement at $0.29 per mile and meal expenses reimbursements at the following rates: Breakfast Lunch $3.00 $6.00 Dinner $12.00 A statement or invoice for legal services and direct costs incurred by the Firm shall be billed to the Risk Management Department and/or the Public Works Administrator on a monthly basis. All invoices shall contain, at a minimum, the following information: 1 ) the proper name of the payee as it appears in the Agreement; 2) the date of the invoice; and 3) the description of services and the time period in which billable services were rendered. All payments and the resolution of any disputes regarding such are subject to and shall be processed in accordance with Part VII of Chapter 218. Florida Statutes, otherwise known as "The Florida Prompt Payment Act". 161[ 1 F. The Firm shall be solely responsible to parties with whom it shall deal in carrying out the terms of this Agreement and shall not subcontract its responsibilities to · the Board under this Agreement. The Firm shall carry Lawyer's Professional Liability insurance in an amount not less than $500,000 per occurrence. An insurance certificate evidencing this Lawyer's Professional Liability insurance requirement shall be tendered to the Risk Management Department within fourteen (14) days of the date of lhis Agreement. Current, valid insurance policy(les) meeting the requirement herein identified shall be maintained by the Firm during the duration of this Agreement. Renewal certificate(s) shall be senl to the County thirty (30) days prior to the expiration date(s) on any such policy(les). There shall be a thirty (30) day notification to the Board in the event of cancellation or modification of any stipulated insurance coverage. G. The Firm shall protect, defend, indemnify, and hold the Board and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from and against any and all losses, penalties, damages, professional fees, including attorneys fees and all costs of litigation and judgments arising out of any willful or intentional misconduct, negligent acts or error or omission of ~he Firm, its subconsultants, subcontractors, agents or employees, arising out of or incidental to the performance of this Agreement or work performed thereunder, including any claim(s) brought against the County, its officers, employees or agents by any employee of the Firm, any subconsultants, subcontractor, or anyone directly or indirectly employed by any of them. The Firm's obligation under this provision shall not be limited in any way by the agreed-upon ccntract fee specified in this Agreement or the Firm's limit of, or lack of, sufficient insurance protection. 16I The parties agree that one percent (1%) of the total compensation to the Firm for performance of services authorized by this · Agreement is specific consideration for the Firm's indemnification of the County. H. This Agreement shall be administered on behalf of the County by the Risk Management Department and Public Works Administrator in coordination with the County Attorney. I. necessary for the conduct of its business and agrees to comply with all laws governing the responsibility of an employer with respect to persons employed by the Firm. The Firm shall also be solely responsible for payment of any and all taxes levied on the Firm. in addition, the Firm shall comply with all rules, regulations and laws of Collier County, the State of Florida, or the U.S. Government now in force or hereafter adopted. J. Either party may terminate this Agreement for convenience with a minimum of forty-five (45) days written notice to the other party. The parties shall deal with each other in good faith during the forty-five (45) day period after any notice of intent to terminate for convenience has been given. The County reserves the right to terminate Ibis Agreement immediately, for cause, upon written notice to the Firm. K. Not'withstanding the Firm's obligation under this Agreement to provide professional legal services to the County for the specific cases identified in Paragraph A of this Agreement, the County acknowledges and agrees that the Firm may take positions adverse to the County on any matters or in any cases that are unrelated to the cases identified in Paragraph A of this Agreement and hereby expressly waives any claim of The Firm agrees to obtain and pay for all permits and licenses conflict of interest in any and all such circumstances. However, under no circumstances shall the Firm represent any person or entity in any personal injury or human resource · (employment) claim, cause of action or litigation against the County for the duration of this Agreement. IT IS FURTHER UNDERSTOOD AND AGREED, by and between the parties herein, that the Agreement is subject to annual appropriation by the Board of County Commissioners. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Firm and the Board have each, respectively, by an authorized person or agent, hereunder set their hands and seals on the date and year first above written. WITNESSES: GOODLETTE, COLEMAN & JOHNSON, P.A. (Printed Witness Signature) (Printed Witness Signature) ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: :~:a-Berry' Cha~man~ (~ 6 Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: County Attorr~ f:county, agr Approvedby: Jeff Walker, ARM Risk Management Director Approved by..~~' '~_~..~ Ed Ilschh'er Public Works Administrator 161-2 SETTI.EMENT AGREEMENT AND REI_EASE This Settlement Agreement and Release ("Agreement and Release") is entered into and made by and between Paul Kitchens (hereinafter referred to as "Kitchens") and Collier County (hereinafter referred to as thc "County"), a political subdivision of the state of Florida, with respect to Case No. 95-4552-CA-0l, filed in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Court in and for Collier County, Florida, as well as all appeals therefrom and any and all claims or controversies between Kitchens and the County that could have been asserted in Case No. 95-4852-CA.01 or that in any way relate to or arise directly or indirectly from Kitchens' employment or termination of employment with the Count,','. WITNESSETil: WHEREAS. Kitchens filed an action against the County in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit Cour~ in and for Collier Count.,.'. Florida, styled Patti Kitchens r. Collier Counn.'. Case No. 95-4852- CA-01 (hereinafter referred to as the "Lawsuit"): WHEi~.EAS. Kitchens alleged various claims against the County in thc Lawsuit and the Count.,.' filed an answer and affimmtive defenses; and WHEREAS. Kitchens and the County, without admitting any liability or fault by either of lhem. nevertheless recognize the cost and uncertainties of litigation and now desire to fully and finalb,' resol','e any and all claims, known or unknown, asserted or that could have been asserted by Kitci~ens in the Lawsuit, including but not limited to all claims for reinstatement, front pay, back pay. attorney's fees and costs, and also desire to fully and finally resolve any and all claims, whether I of 9 161- known or unknown, that relate in any way to or arise directly or indirectly from Kitchen's employment or termination of employment with the County; and WHEREAS, Kitchens and the County further desire to reduce their compromise of the Lawsuit and all claims that could have been asserted in the Lawsuit or that relate in any way to or arise directly or indirectly from Kitchen's employment or termination of employment with the County to a writing so that it may be binding upon Kitchens and the County and their respective predecessors, successors, heirs, assigns, employees, elected officials, officers, agenfs? representatives, attorneys, insurers, sureties and affiliates; NO\\.', THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, promises and considerations set forth in this Agreement and Release, thc sufficiency ofv,'hich is hereby acknowledged, and with the intent to be legally bound, Kitchens and thc County mutually agree to the following: Kitchens and the County agree to adopt and incorporate thc foregoing recitals, sometimes referred to as "Whereas clauses," by reference into this Agreement and Release. The County agrees to pay Kitchens the sum of Three Thousand Dollars and No Cents (S3,000.00) in full satisfaction of all claims Kitchens has made or could have made in the Lav,'suit or that relate in any ,,,.'ay to or arise directly or indirectly from Kitct~cns' employment or termination of employment with the County. 2of9 The settlement sum of S3,000.00 is to be allocated as alleged back pay. -2 The payment to Kitchens of 53,000.00, although properly allocated as described above, includes all amounts allegedly due to Kitchens from the County for any reason whatsoever including without limitation, all back pay, all front pay, all compensatory damages, costs, taxes, expenses, attorney's fees and equitable relief that Kitchens has claimed or could have claimed in the Lawsuit or that relate in any v.'av to or arise directly or indirectly from Kitchens' employmem or lermination of employment with the Count>'. Kitchens agrees to assist his attorneys in preparing, executing and filing both a Notice of Withdrawal or Dismissal with Prejudice of his Motion for Rehearing pending in the Lawsuit in the trial court and a Notice of Dismissal with Prejudice of his appeal pending in the Lawsuit in the appellate court. Kitchens represents and warrants to the Count.,,' that he has not filed any other charge, lawsuit, claim or an)' other action against the Count.,,' or any entity or natural person the: is or has been associated with. controlled by or under common control with/of thc Count,,'. Except for any claim to enforce tile terms and conditions of this Agreement and Release. Kitchens on behalf of himself and an)' and all heirs, executors, administrators, legal representatives, attorneys, agents, successors and assigns shall 3 of 9 16 -2 and hereby does fully, finally and unconditionally release, acquit, rcmisc, satisfy and forever discharge thc County as well as its former, present and future elected officials, officers, employees, altorncys, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors, insurers, sureties, and assigns from any and all manner of action or actions, cause or causes of action, suits, debts, dues. sums of money, accounts, reckonings, c,~vcnants, charges, damages, obligations, attorney's fees, costs, liabilities, contracts, promises, judgments, executions, claims or complaints, whether legal or equitable and wh.:thcr !cnown or unknown, which Kitchens ha: or could have asserted in the Lawsuit, or which he no,.,.' has or may have against thc Count.,,' or its former, present and future elected officials, officers, employees, attorneys, agents. representatives, predecessors, successors, insurers, sureties and assigns, arising directly or indirectly out of or relating in any way to claims or allegations in the Lawsuit or that could have been made in the Lawsuit or relating in way to or arising directly or indirectly from Kitchens' employment or termination of employment with the County. Kitchens agrees to indemnify, defend, and to hold the County harmless from and against (i) any and all lability, claims (whether pending or threatened and whether judicial, administrative or other'wise), costs, causes of action, demands and expenses arising out of or based on an5' breach of this Agreement and Release by Kitchens or on account of any representations or warranties made by Kitchens herein which are later found to be false: and (ii)any tax liability, including but not limited to income tax, social security tax, penalties and payment made by the County constitutes 4of9 taxable income to Kitchens. In this latter regard, Kitchens acknowledges and agrees upon advice from his counsel that any tax liabilities including but not limited to income tax, social security tax, penalties and interest associated with payment of any monies to him under this Agreement and Release are solely and exclusively his responsibility. Without in any way limiting the scope of the release in Paragraph 7 above, both Kitchens and the County a~ee to waive the right lc seek pas.'ment of attorney's fees or costs incurred in the Lawsuit, and both part/es agree to pay for their respective attorney's fees and costs incurred in the Lawsuit. 10. Kitchens represents and warrants to the County that he is authorized to enter into and that he has the authority to perform the terms ofthis Agreement and Release and that he has not sold, assigned, transferred, conveyed or other, vise disposed of all or any portion of the claims he has released and discharged in this Agreement and Release. lt. This Agrccment and Release is the result ora compromise ofdisputed claims and it is understood that the execution and performance of this Agreement and Release by the County does not constitute, nor shall it be construed as an admission that it violated any law, statute, rule or regulation of either the United States or the state of Florida or breached any duty owed to Kitchens under federal, state or local law, policy, or practice with respect to Kitchens' employment or the termination ofhis 5of9 161.-2 employment with the County or that any of Kitchens' claims have any merit whatsoever. /he County explicitly denies any and ali such wrongdoing. 12. This Agreement and Release shall be governed by the laws of the state of Florida. 13. This Agreement and Release is freely and voluntarily executed by Kitchens and the County after they have been apprised of all relevant information concerning this Agreement and Release and after they have rccciv,-d advice of their respective counsel. In executing this Agreement and Release, Kitchens and the County do not rely on any inducements, promises, representations, other than the promises and representations set forth in this Agreement and Release. In this regard, Kitchens and the County acknowledge that this Agreement and Release is the product ofmutual negotiations and no doubtful or ambiguous provision in this Agreement and Release is to be constr~lcd against an.,,' party based upon a claim that the party drafted the ambiguous language. 14. ]'his Agreement and Release may be amended only by a written instrument specifically referring to this Agreement and Release and executed with the same formalities as this Agreement and Release. 15. Should any provision of this Agreement and Release be declared or be determined by any Court to be illegal or invalid, the validity ofthe remaining parts, terms, and 6of9 provisions shall not be affected thereby and such an illegal or invalid part, term or provision shall be deemed not to be part of this Agreement and Release. 16. In the event of an alleged breach of this Agreement and Release, Kitchens and the County hereby agree that all underlying causes of action or claims of Kitchens and the County have been extinguished by this Agreement and Release and that the sole remedy for breach of this Agreement and Release shall be for specific performance o f its terms and conditions. In this regard, Kitchcas anti the Cot,.nly further agree that the sole venue for any such action for specific performance shall be the Twentieth Judical Circuit in and for Collier County, Florida in Naples. Florida. 17. Kitchens and the County agree that this Agreement and Release supersedes and replaces all prior agreements and understandings and that it constitutes the entire agreement between Kitchens and thc County and that there exist no other agreements, oral or v,'ritten, between them relating to any matters covered by this Agreement and Release or any other matter whatsoever. This Agreement and Release may be executed in an,,' number ofcounterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original, but all of which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 19. Except as may be othenvise expressly provided herein, Kitchens and thc County represent and warrant that in executing this Agreement and Release, they do not rely 7ot'9 16 -2 upon and have not relied upon any oral or written representations, promises, warranties, or understandings made by either of them or their representatives with regard to the subject matter, basis or effect of this Agreement and Release. 20. Kitchens and the County acknowledge and assume the risk that facts, additional and different or contrary, to thc facts which they believe to exist, may now exist or may be discovered after this Agreement and Release has been entered, and the parties agree ~hat any such additio~al, different or contm~T facts shall in no way limit, v,'aix e. affect or alter this Agreement and Release. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Kitchens and the County have executed this Agreement and Release. which consists of' nine (9) pages, on the dates set forth below next to their respective signatures and as sworn to and acknowledged by Kitchens. DATED: ,P'z~.~ F' ATTEST: -"/"~ DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Date: 8of9 161-2 Tills SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE BETWEEN PAUL KITCIIENS AND COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 5VAS SWOILN' TO and subscribed by Paul Kitchens before me this \\r"~dayof -'--..~ ~,,~,,_,..(x_ ^'~, 1998. Signature o£ ~);o-tary Public Personally Known or Produced Identi fication Commissioned Name of'Notary Public (Please print, type or stamp) My commission expires: Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Michael W. Pcttit, Esq. Goodlctte. Coleman & Johnson, P.A. Assistant Count> Attorney Lawrence S. Pivacek Type of Identification Produced E~,u~,~ C~. 20. lg~e 9of9