Loading...
Agenda 09/27/2002 WCOLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHECKBOOK CONCURRENCY WORKSHOP September 27, 2002 AGENDA 9:00 - 9:15 am WHAT WE SAID WE WANT TO DO - GMP TRANSMITTAL Stan Litsinger 9:15 - 9:35 am HOW DO WE GET THERE? - IMPLEMENTATION a) LDC - Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (3.15) and additional GMP modifications Norman Feder 9:35 - 9:55 am b) Traffic Concurrency Procedures Manual Don Scott 9:55 - 10:25 am DCA OBJECTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR COMPLIANCE - ORC Report and LOS Calculation Techniques Nancy Linnan 10:25 - 10:35 am BREAK 10:35 - 12:00 pm PUBLIC COMMENTS 12:00 - 1:00 pm WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? - REVIEW OF OPTIONS a) Staythe Course b) Phase-In with reassessment of vested and DRI project impacts 1. Transmit Interim and October 1,2003 Checkbook 2. Transmit only Interim c) Modify timeframe (capacity improvement) used to determine concurrency 1. 1 year vs. under construction 2. 3 year, 2 year, 1 year phasing d) Maintain current process Norman Feder 1:00 - 2:00 pm CONTINUATION OF PUBLIC COMMENTS (as needed) JEB BUSH Governor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to ca//home" STEVEN M. SEIBERT Secretary September 16, 2002 The Honorable Jim Coletta Chairman, Collier County Board of County Commissioners 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 Dear Chairman Coletta: The Department has completed its review of the proposed comprehensive plan amendment for Collier (DCA No. 02-2), which was received on July 5, 2002. Based on Chapter 163, Florida Statutes (F.S)., we have prepared the attached report which outlines our findings concerning the amendment. It is particularly important that the County address the "objections" set forth in our review report so that these issues can be successfully resolved prior to adoption. We have also included a copy of local, regional and state agency comments for your consideration. Within the next 60 days, the County should act by choosing to adopt, adopt with changes or not adopt the proposed amendment. For your assistance, our report outlines procedures for final adoption and transmittal. The proposed amendment involves changes to the Capital Improvements Element, Transportation Element, and Future Land Use Element, all of which are intended to enable the implementation of a new concurrency management system. The Department appreciates Collier County's initiative to address traffic problems. However, we are concerned that the approach presented in the amendment, on its own, may not be feasible. It would be more appropriate and beneficial for the County to consider a comprehensive approach to the problem including reevaluating the adopted level of service standards, land uses strategies, and utilizing other options provided by Chapter 163, Florida Statutes. 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD · TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: http://www.dca.state.fl.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIEI. D OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon, FL 33050-2227 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (305) 289-2402 (8fO) 488*2356 (850) 413-9969 (850) 48B~7956 JEB BUSH Governor STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS "Dedicated to making Florida a better place to call home' STEVEN M. SEIBERT Secretary The Honorable Jim Coletta September 16, 2002 Page Three I believe the concerns outlined in our report can be resolved. We are available to work with your staff to develop an approach that will work for the County. If you or your staff have any questions, or if we maybe of further assistance, please contact Bernard O. Piawah, Senior Planner, at (850) 922-1810. Sincerely, HET/bp Enclosures: CC: H. E. "Sonny" Timmerman Director, Division of Community Planning Review Agency Comments Mr. David Burr, Acting Director, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council Mr. David Weeks, Collier County Planning Department Ms. Nancy Linnan, Esquire, Carlton Fields 2555 SHUMARD OAK BOULEVARD · TALLAHASSEE, FLORIDA 32399-2100 Phone: 850.488.8466/Suncom 278.8466 FAX: 850.921.0781/Suncom 291.0781 Internet address: http://www.dca.state.fl.us CRITICAL STATE CONCERN FIELD OFFICE COMMUNITY PLANNING EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HOUSING & COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 2796 Overseas Highway, Suite 212 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Marathon, FL 33050-2227 Talrahassee, FL 32399-2100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-9100 Tallahassee, FL 32399-21130 (305) 2B9-2402 (850) 488-2356 (850) 413-9969 (850) 488-7956 TRANSMITTAL PROCEDURES Upon receipt of this letter, Collier County has 60 days in which to adopt, adopt with changes, or determine not to adopt the proposed comprehensive plan amendment. The process for adoption of local comprehensive plan is outlined in Section 163.3184, F.S., and Rule 9J-11.011, F.A.C. Within ten working days of the date of adoption, County must submit the following to the Department: Three copies of the adopted comprehensive plan amendment; A copy of the adoption ordinance; A listing of additional changes not previously reviewed; A listing of findings by the local governing body, if any, which were not included in the ordinance; and A statement indicating the relationship of the additional changes to the Department's Objections, Recommendations and Comments Report. The above amendment and documentation are required for the Department to conduct a compliance review, make a compliance determination and issue the appropriate notice of intent. In order to expedite the regional planning council's review of the plan, and pursuant to Rule 9J-11.011(5), F.A.C., please provide a copy of the adopted plan directly to the Executive Director of the Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council. Please be advised that the Florida Legislature amended Section 163.3184(8)(b), F.S., requiring the Department to provide a courtesy information statement regarding the Department's Notice of Intent to citizens who furnish their names and addresses at the local government's amendment transmittal (proposed) or adoption hearings. In order to provide this courtesy information statement, local governments are required by the law to furnish to the Department the names and addresses of the citizens requesting this information. This list is to be submitted at the time of transmittal of the adopted amendment. As discussed in our letter sent to you on May 25, 2001, outlining the changes to Section 163.3184(8)(b), F.S., which were effective July 1, 2001, and providing a model sign-in information sheet, please provide these required names and addresses to the Department when you transmit your adopted plan for compliance review. For efficiency, we encourage that the information sheet be provided in electronic format. DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS OBJECTIONS, RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT COLLIER COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 02-2 September 16, 2002 Division of Community Planning Bureau of Local Planning This report is prepared pursuant to Rule 9J- 11.010, F.A.C. INTRODUCTION The following objections, recommendations and comments are based upon the Department' s review of Collier County' s proposed Comprehensive Plan amendment, pursuant to Section 163.3184, Florida Statutes (F.S.). The objections relate to specific requirements of relevant portions of Chapter 9J-5, Florida Administrative Codes (F.A.C.), and Chapter 163, Part 1/, F.S. The objections include a recommendation of an approach that might be taken to address the cited objection. Other approaches may be more suitable in specific situations. Some of these objections may have initially been raised by one of the other external review agencies. If there is a difference between the Department's objection and the external agency advisory objection or comment, the Department's objection would take precedence. The County should address each of these objections when the plan is resubmitted for our compliance review. Objections which are not addressed may result in a determination that the amendment is not in compliance. The Department may have raised an objection regarding missing data and analysis items which the County considers not applicable to its amendment. If that is the case, a statement justifying its non-applicability pursuant to Rule 9J-5.002(2), F.A.C., must be submitted. The Department will make a determination on the non-applicability of the requirement, and if the justification is sufficient, the objection will be considered addressed. The comments which follow the objections and recommendations are advisory in nature. Comments will not form bases of a determination of non-compliance. They are included to call attention to items raised by our reviewers. The comments can be substantive, concerning planning principles, methodology or logic, as well as editorial in nature dealing with grammar, organization, mapping, and reader comprehension. Appended to the back of the Department' s report are the comment letters from the other state review agencies and other agencies, organizations and individuals. These comments are advisory to the Department and may not form bases of Departmental objections unless they appear under the "Objections" heading in this report. OBJECTIONS RECOMMENDATIONS AND COMMENTS REPORT PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT 02-2 COLLIER COUNTY I. CONSISTENCY WITH RULE 9J-5., FAC., & CHAPTER 163., F.S. The amendment proposed by Collier County involves changes to the Capital Improvements Element (CIE), Transportation Element, and Future Land Use Element, all of which are intended to enable the implementation of a new concurrency management system (CMS). The Department has identified the following objection which needs to be addressed in order to achieve compliance: Objection: Ability to Achieve and Maintain Adopted Level of Service Standards: The proposed amendment would remove one of the options for addressing concurrency for transportation impacts. Essentially development applicants would no longer rely on road improvements listed within the first three years of the Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvements. The County is required to have a financially feasible capital improvements plan which demonstrates that it will achieve and maintain adopted level of service (LOS) standards so that the public facility capacity needed to support growth and development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development. The proposed amendment is not supported by data and analysis demonstrating that the County will achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards given the proposed amendment. Chapter 163.3180(2)(c), Florida Statutes (FS), and Rule9J-5.0055(1)(a) & (b), (2)(a)l., & (3)(c), and 9J-5.016(4)1., Florida Administrative Code (FAC). Recommendation: The County should demonstrate that it has a financially feasible capital improvements plan to achieve and maintain the adopted LOS standards. Some of the options to consider include utilizing other concurrency mechanisms allowed by Chapter 163, FS and Rule 9J-5, FAC including adjusting the adopted level of service standards, project phasing, and developer contributions. In addition, data and analysis should be provided which show the relationship between the impacts of the proposed amendment and the improvements listed on the Five-Year Schedule of Capital Improvement. Furthermore, the analysis should indicate the impact of this amendment on other elements and objectives of the comprehensive plan, including encouraging a compact land use pattern, affordable housing and the protection natural resources. Alternatively, the County should consider not adopting the amendment. II. CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed amendments are not consistent with the State Comprehensive plan including the following goals and policies (163.3177(9):) Public Facilities Goal (18)(a) and Policies (b)l., & 2.; regarding the provision of public facilities; Recommendation: Revise the proposed amendment as indicated in the objections and recommendations of this report in order to be consistent with the above goals and policies of the State Comprehensive Plan. 2 9~24/02 DIVISION 3.15. ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES* 1 *Code reference--Adequate public facilities ordinance, § 106-71 et seq. State law reference(s)--Concurrency, F.S. § 163.3180. Sec. 3.15.1. Short title, authority and applicability. 3.15.1.1. Short title. This division shall be known and may be cited as the "Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance." 3.15.1.2. Authority. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County has the authority to adopt this division pursuant to Article VIII, Section l(f), Fla. Const., F.S. § 125.01 et. seq., F.S. § 163.3161 et. seq., F.S. § 163.3161(8), F.S. §9 163.3177(10)(h) and F.S. § 163.3202(2)(g), and Rule 9J-5, F.A.C. 3.15.1.3. Applicability. This division shall apply to all development in the total unincorporated area of Collier County, and to all public facilities owned by Collier County in the incorporated or unincorporated areas of Collier County, and to all privately-owned public facilities where the level of service has been established by the county. (Ord. No. 94-27, § 3; Ord. No. 99-6, § 3.1.) Sec. 3.15.2. 'Intent and purpose. 3.15.2.1. Intent. This division is intended to implement and be consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan, F.S. § 163.3161 et. seq., and Rule 9J-5, F.A.C., by ensuring that all development in Collier County be served by adequate public facilities. 3.15.2.2. Purpose. This objective is accomplished by (1) establishing a management and monitoring system to evaluate and coordinate the timing and provision of the necessary public facilities to service development, and (2) by establishing a regulatory program that ensures that each public facility is available to serve development concurrent with when the impacts of development occur on the public facilities. 3.15.2.3. Minimum requirements. The provisions of this division in their interpretation and application are declared to be the minimum requirements necessary to accomplish the stated intent, purposes, and objectives of this division. (Ord. No. 94-27, § 3; Ord. No. 99-6, § 3.I.) 9/24/02 Sec. 3.15.3. Definitions. 3.15.3.1. Annual update and inventory report or AUIR means the county report on public facilities described in section 3.15.6.2. 3.15.3.2. Application for development approval means an application submitted to Collier County requesting the approval of a development order. 3.15.3.3. Average annual daily traffic (AADT) shall be calculated consistent with the methodology established by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). However the peak hour shall be established by using only 10 months of the year excluding February and March data. ......... ~: .... ~.,~,~ ...... ,~.~ .~, ~ .... ~, ...... *~ Bac~ogg~ facilities ~e roadways or segments that ~e not constrained, they either exceed capacity, or are operating above 75% of the roadway's se~ice capacity without the needed improvement progr~ed within the year required in the five year Schedule of Capital ~provements as identified in the mathx and process found in the Traffic Concu~ency Pr~edures Manual. Bac~ogged roadways are subject to 5% or 10% ~owth resMctions annually based on the percentage of capacity available and when the construction phase to add capacity is progra~ed in the Schedule of Capital ~provements~ A bac~ogged roadway should be a ~nimum of 0.2 ~les in length. 9/24/02 3.15.3.5. Capital drainage facilities means the planning of, engineering for, acquisition of land for, or the construction of drainage and water management facilities necessary for proposed development to meet the LOS for drainage facilities. 3.15.3.6. Capital park facilities means the planning of, engineering for, acquisition of land for, or construction of buildings and park equipment necessary to meet the LOS for park facilities. 3.15.3.7. Capital road facilities or capital road improvement shall include transportation planning for, engineering for, right-of-way acquisition for, eng':nee~ng for, and construction of any project eligible for inclusion as a road project in the road component of the CIE of the Collier County Growth Management Plan or the Five-Year Florida Department of Transportation Plan. 3.15.3.8 Capital potable water facilities mean the planning of, engineering for, acquisition of land for, or construction of potable water facilities necessary to meet the LOS for potable water facilities. 3.15.3.9. Capital sanitary sewer facilities mean the planning of, engineering for, acquisition of land for, or construction of sanitary sewer facilities necessary to meet the LOS for sanitary sewer facilities. 3.15.3.10. Capital solid waste facilities mean the planning of, engineering for, acquisition of land for, or construction of solid waste facilities n~essary to meet the LOS for solid waste facilities. 3.15.3.11. Comprehensive plan means a plan that meets the requirements of F.S. §§ 163.3177 and 163.3178, and shall mean the Collier County Growth Management Plan, where referenced in this division. Constrained facilities are roadways which have been designated by action of the Board of County Commissioners once it has been determined that the facility will not be'expanded by two or more through lanes due to physical, environmental or policy constraints. Physical constraints occur when a roadway is developed to the maximum six lane standard or when intensive land use development is immediately adjacent to roads, thus making expansion cost prohibitive. Environmental and policy constraints occur when decisions are made not to expand a road based on environmental, historical, archaeological, aesthetic or social impact considerations. Constrained roadways are identified by action of the BCC upon the recommendation of the Transportation Administrator. 9/24/02 Roadways identified as constrained shall be subject to growth restrictions such that further LOS degradation does not occur once the roadway is determined to be operating below Level-of-Service standard. Constrained roadways are subject to growth restrictions that only allow for an increase in annual daily traffic volume of 10% above the service volume at Level-of-Service standard resulting in LOS operations not to exceed 110% of service volume. Roadways operating at maximum six lane standards can be considered constrained when the facilities exceed 75% capacity. If the standard service volume is exceeded by ~ 110%, de md,",i~2s only de minimis growth would can be applied to the roadway segment. 3.15.3.12.1. Physical barriers or constraints occur when intensive land use development is immediately adjacent to highways making roadway expansion cost prohibitive, or a facility has reached the maximum through lane standards acceptable to the county. 3.15.3.12.2. The maximum through lane standard shall be no greater than six through lanes with allowances for auxiliary or service lanes as deemed operationally necessary_ for county maintained facilities and as designated by the Florida Department of Transportation for state maintained facilities. 3.15.3.12.3. Policy barriers or constraints are artificial barriers to roadway expansions based on environmental or political realities within a community. Unlike physical constraints, however, these barriers to roadway expansion can change over time, as needs and community goals change.... 9/24/02 3.15.3.13. Deficient road segment means a county or state road segment on the major road network system that is operating below its adopted level of service standard. '--; 3.15.3.14. Roadway service volumes shall be determined based on the methodology contained in the most recent edition of the "Highway Capacity Manual", Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) procedures and applications, and the level of service standards set forth in the Capital Improvements and Transportation Elements of the Growth Management Plan, taking into consideration: Current roadway facilities including, but not limited to, number of lanes, provision of turn lanes and number of signals. 2. Capital road improvements under construction. 3~< a ~a ~ ~ · Any improvements that ~e guaranteed in an enforceable and executed development alre~mCnt in which the improvements am completed or under construction before the impacts from the development or phased development accrue to the roadway system. the *h;'d ye~ shall consider: 9/24/02 3.15.3.-1415. Developer means any person, including a governmental agency, undertaking any development as defined in this division. 3.15.3.-1-516. Development agreement has the meaning contemplated in F.S. § 163.3220 et seq. 3.15.3.-1-617. Development has the meaning given it in F.S. § 380.04. 3.15.3.-1-g18. Development order means any order, permit, determination, or action granting, denying, or granting with conditions as application for any final local development order, building permit, temporary use permit, temporary construction and development permit, sign permit, well permit, spot survey, electrical permit, plumbing permit, occupational license, boat dock permit, HVAC permit, septic tank permit, right- of-way permit, blasting permit, excavation permit, construction approval for infrastructure (including water, sewer, grading, paving), approved development of regional impact (DRI), zoning ordinance amendment, comprehensive plan amendment, flood variance, coastal construction control line variance, tree removal permits, site development plan approval, subdivision approval (including plats, plans, variances, and amendments), rezoning, PUD amendment, certification, conditional use (provisional use), variance, or any other official action of Collier County having the effect of.permitting development as defined in this division. 3.15.3.-14~19. Final development order means a final local development order or a final DRI development order. 3.15.3.-lX920. Final DRI development order means a development order, as amended from time to time, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County and approved by the state pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, notice of which is recorded pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(15)(0. 9/24/02 3.15.3.g021. Final local development order means a final approved subdivision plat, a final approved site development plan, or unexpired building permit or mobile home tie- down permit issued by the county. 3.15.3.-2-1-22. Growth management plan or GMP means the most recently adopted and effective comprehensive plan of Collier County, as amended from time to time. 3.15.3.gg23. Land development regulations mean ordinances enacted by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 163.3161 et. set., for the regulation of development, and includes any zoning, subdivision, impact fee, building construction, or sign regulations, or any other regulations controlling the development of land. 3.15.3.g-324. Level of service (LOS) means an indicator of the extent or degree of service provided by, or proposed to be provided by a public facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the public facility, as adopted in the Collier County growth management plan. LOS shall indicate the capacity per unit of demand for each public facility. 3.15.3.25. Level of service (LOS) for roads shall be determined by comparing the cumulative traffic volumes based on current traffic counts as determined in the Traffic Concurrency Procedures Manual, including traffic capacity volumes determined to be vested per section 3.15.7.2.6. of this Division and the proposed project traffic impacts as determined by the transportation concurrency management system, compared to the roadway capacity for each segment identified in the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. 3.15.3.g-526. LOS for capital drainage facilities varies among 1) new or existing capital drainage facilities owned or operated by a local government or other public entity, 2) existing capital drainage facilities owned or operated by private persons, and 3) new capital drainage facilities owned or operated by private persons. For those capital drainage facilities (publicly or privately owned) that are in existence on the effective date of this division and for those new capital drainage facilities owned or operated by a local government or other public entity, the LOS is the existing LOS as identified (by design storm return frequency event) in the Collier County Water Management Master Plan. For new capital drainage facilities owned or operated by private persons, the LOS is 9/24/02 identified in the drainage sub-element and capital improvement element policy 1.1.56_.A.3 (present requirements are a 25-year, three-day storm event) and is based on those standards and requirements for renewal and approval of drainage and stormwater management plans established in the Collier County Water Management Policy Ordinance No. 74-50, as amended and Ordinance No. 90-10 which are incorporated herein by reference. 3.15.3.g627. LOS for capital park facilities means 2.9412 acres per 1,000 persons for regional park land; 1.2882 acres per/i,000 persons for community park land; and $179.90 $240 of capital investment per capita (at current cost) for recreational facilities. 3.15.3.gg28. LOS for capital potable water facilities varies between public water systems and private water systems. For the county water and sewer district the LOS is 185 gallons per capita per day (GPCD). For the Goodland water district the LOS is 163 GPCD. For the city of Naples unincorporated service area the LOS is 163 GPCD. For the Everglades City unincorporated service area the LOS is 163 GPCD. For private potable water systems; the LOS is the sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 1.31 of the Potable Water Sub-Element of the Growth Management Plan,,,"~ ~,^u~,~,,,.,,, o, except that approved private wells are exempt from these LOS requirements.'-. 9/24/02 3.15.3.-2,g29. LOS for capital road facilities on the major road network system are as set forth in Policy 1.1.6 of the Capital Improvement Element and Policy 1.4 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan. "~'~'~, ~--,o ,--'r,-----e, '~ .... '~; .... -,- ~'~-,-- '-2 .... r'- -'-~' 9 9/24/02 'T' ^'m = ~TSET' 3.15.3.g9.30. The LOS for capital sanitary sewer facilities varies between public sanitary sewer systems and private sanitary sewer systems. The LOS for '"'~'~;~,~.~,..,~ .... ~-...,,..j:* ........... ~,~..,~ ~ .... ~ ....., ~:~ ,h~ ~ ~e ~ ~ ~the Noah Sewer Area is 145 gallons per capita per day (~cd). The LOS for the South Sewer ~ea is 100 gallons per Capita per day (gpcd). The LOS for the City of Naples Uninco~orated Se~ice Area is 121 gallons per day per capita (gpcd). The LOS for private sanitary sewer systems is as required by the State of Florida in Chapter 10-D-6, F.A.C. These standards vary according to the type of land use. The;,' ~e ~ ~',-" ..........' '~-~" aApproved private septic systems are exempt from these LOS requirements+: 10 9/24/02 11 9/24/02 3.15.3. 3031 LOS for capital solid waste disposal facilities ..... ; ...... ,-r:~;..., ,.~.;,.~ rates an * ........ ~ ................... ~ .... : .~ ~ ................. s two years o constructed lined cell capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) ye~s, and ten (10) yem of pe~ttable landfill capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) ye~s. 12 9/24/02 3 1~5 3 ~32 " t~z *~*~' ""; ....... ~.~ ~.m~ ~ .... *" The major road network system is depicted in the traffic ckzu]aQon Transpo~ation element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 3.15.3.33. The Peak ....... , peak hour is based on the ,nn,u 3,ear, average of 10 months of the year (less February/March) and is the basic time reference used to calculate levels of service using the definitions and methodologies ot the current edition of the Transportation Research Board Highway Capacity Manual and the procedures and applications from the Florida Department of Transportation. 3.15.3.35~_. Person means an individual, corporation, governmental agency, business trust, estate, trust, partnership, association, two or more persons having a joint or common interest, or any other entity, and its designated agents, successors or assigns. 13 9/24/02 3.!5.3.36.3.2. 3.15.3.g-735. Public facilities mean capital drainage facilities, capital park facilities, capital potable water facilities, capital road facilities, capital sanitary sewer facilities, and capital solid waste facilities. (Ord. No. 94-27, § 3; Ord. No. 96-66, § 3.J.; Ord. No. 99-6, § 3.I.) Sec. 3.15.4. Rules of construction. In the construction of this division, the rules set out in this section shall be observed unless such construction is inconsistent with the manifest intent of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. The rules of construction and definitions set forth herein shall not be applied to any provisions which expressly exclude such construction, or where the subject matter, content or context of such provisions would make such construction internally inconsistent or inconsistent with other provisions of this division. 3.15.4.1. Generally. All provisions, terms, phrases and expressions contained in this division shall be liberally construed in order that the true intent and meaning of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners may be fully carried out. Terms used in this division, unless otherwise specifically provided, shall have the meanings prescribed by the statutes of this state for the same terms. 14 9/24/02 In the interpretation and application of any provision of this division it shall be held to be the minimum requirement adopted for the promotion of the public health, safety, comfort, convenience and general welfare. Where any provision of this division imposes greater restrictions upon the subject matter than a general provision imposed by the growth management plan or another provision of this division, the provision imposing the greater restriction or regulation shall be deemed to be controlling. 3.15.4.2. Text. In case of any difference of meaning or implication between the text of this division and any figure, the text shall control. 3.15.4.3. Computation of time. The time within which an act is to be done shall be computed by excluding the first and including the last day; if the last day is Saturday, Sunday or legal holiday, that day shall be excluded. 3.15.4.4. Day. The word "day" shall mean a calendar day, unless "business" day is indicated. 3.15.4.5. Delegation of authority. Whenever a provision appears requiring a division administrator, the head of a department or some other county officer or employee to do some act or perform some duty, it is to be construed to authorize the division administrator, head of the department or some other county officer or employee to designate, delegate and authorize professional level subordinates to perform the required act or duty unless the terms of the provision or section specify otherwise. 3.15.4.6. Gender. Words importing the masculine gender shall be construed to include the feminine and neuter. 3.15.4.7. Month. The word "month" shall mean a calendar month. 3.15.4.8. Non-technical and technical words. Words and phrases shall be construed according to the common and approved usage of the language, but technical words and phrases and such others as may have acquired a peculiar and appropriate meaning in law shall be construed and understood according to such meaning. 3.15.4.9. Number. A word importing the singular number only, may extend and be applied to several persons and things as well as to one person and thing. The use of the plural number shall be deemed to include any single person or thing. 3.15.4.10. Shall, may. The word "shall" is mandatory; "may" is permissive. 3.15.4.11. Tense. Words used in the past or present tense include the future as well as the past or present. 3.15.4.12. Week. The word "week" shall mean seven calendar days. 15 9/24/02 3.15.4.13. Written or in writing. The term "written" or "in writing" shall be construed to include any representation of words, letters, or figures whether by printing or other form or method of writing. 3.15.4.14. Year. The word "year" shall mean a calendar year, unless a fiscal year is indicated or 365 days is indicated. (Ord. No. 94-27, § 3; Ord. No. 96-66, § 3.J.; Ord. No. 99-6, § 3.I.) Sec. 3.15.5. Establishment of management and monitoring program and regulatory program: the annual update and inventory report (AUIR), Transportation Concurrency Management System, CIE amendments, and annual budget. In order to implement the mandate of the Collier County Growth Management Plan to ensure that adequate potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, park and road public facilities are available to accommodate development in Collier County concurrent with when the impacts of development occur on such public facilities, the Board of County Commissioners establishes, pursuant to the terms of this division, (1) a management and monitoring program that evaluates the conditions of public facilities to ensure they are being adequately planned for and funded to maintain the LOS for each public facility herein after referred to as the AUIR, and (2) a regulatory program that ensures that each public facility is available to serve development orders which are subject to the provisions of this division herein after referred to as the Concurrency Management System, which will mean the AUIR, except for roads, which shall have a separate regulatory program which shall be the Transportation Concurrency Management System. (Ord. No. 94-27, § 3; Ord. No. 99-6, § 3.1.) Sec. 3.15.6. Management and monitoring program~ 3.15.6.1. General. In order to ensure that adequate potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, park and road public facilities are available concurrent with when the impacts of development occur on such public facilities, the county shall establish the following management and monitoring practices. Their purpose is to evaluate and coordinate the timing, provision, and funding of potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, park and road public facilities (1) to ensure adequate plan. ning and funding to maintain the LOS for the public facilities, and (2) to evaluate the capacity of the public facilities for use in the regulatory program to ensure that no development orders subject to concurrency regulation are issued unless adequate public facilities are available to serve the development concurrent with when the impacts of that development occur. 3.15.6.2. Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR). On .or about December 1 of each year, the Community Development and Environmental Services · Division Administrator shall complete an annual update and inventory report on public 16 9/24/02 facilities (hereinafter "ALrlR"). The AUIR shall determine the existing conditions of all capital potable water, capital sanitary sewer, capital solid waste, capital drainage, capital park, and capital road public facilities to determine and summarize the available capacity of these capital improvements (public facilities) based on their LOS, forecast the capacity of existing and planned public facilities identified in the five-year capital improvement schedule for each of the five succeeding years, and ten succeeding years, and identify new projects needed to maintain adopted LOS. The forecasts shall be based on the most recently updated schedule of capital improvements (public facilities) for each public facility. The AUIR shall be based on the most recent bureau of economic and business research (BEBR) population projections, updated public facility inventories, updated unit costs and revenue projections, and analysis of the most recent traffic county data and the transportation concurrency management system database. The findings of the AUIR, as approved by the Board of County Commissioners, shall be the basis for the preparation of the next annual update and amendment of the CIE and the annual determination of deficient, constrained or backlogged "Category A" facilities, except for roadways. The AU1R shall identify additional projects and funding for inclusion in the Schedule of Capital Improvements and the Costs and Revenues Schedule of the CIE needed to maintain or restore adopted LOS for all "Category A" facilities for the next five years. Direction by the Board of County Commissioners to update and amend the CIE to include projects and revenues needed to maintain adopted LOS for "Category A" facilities, as identified in the AUIR, shall constitute a finding of concurrent "Category A" facilities, except roads, for the review and issuance of development orders subject to the provisions of this division until the presentation of the next AUIR. In addition to identifying needed capacity expansion projects and revenues for inclusion in the CIE, the roads component of the AUIR will include an audit and update of the capacity balances in the Transportation Concurrency Management System database factoring in development approvals since the previous AUIR and capacity expansion projects included in the financially feasible Schedule of Capital Improvements of the CIE. However, concurrency for roadways shall be determined utilizing the Traffic Concurrency Procedures Manual and the policies set forth in Section 3.15 of the Land Development Code. 3.15.6.2.1.. Annual determination of adequate "Category A" public facilities (concage ............................ ~--, ................; ...... E ............ E~,,; ......,~ e~,;~ ~;,,;o;~- ~;-;~*~*~ The County Manager will annuall~ present the A~ repoa to the Bo~d of County Co~issioners identifying deficiencies ~ ox potential deficiencies in "Category A" public facilities and reme~al action options including but not li~ted to the following: Establishment of ...... r o;~.;t;~.., ;,,+n ...... r ^ m,o~ constrained or backlogged facilities; Public facility project additions to the financially feasible CIE; deficient.: 17 9/24/02 Defe~a! Ac `4 .... ~ ..... , ~..~; ........ Establish interim development controls in affected service areas pending: a. Lowering of LOS via growth management plan amendment; b. Inclusion of necessary public facility projects in the next adopted annual budget and next annual CIE update and amendment; c. Approval of new or increased revenue sources for needed public facility projects by the Board of County Commissioners, the state legislature or the county voters. d. Private development improvements guaranteed by an enforceable development agreement. 3.15.6.3 Recommendations on the annual CIE update and annual budget. Based upon ly the AUIR ana sis, the t~ ...... ~,., r, .... ~ .....* .. ~ the County Manager or designee shall propose to the Collier County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners .......... eaeh-ye~, the annual update and amendment to the CIE as part of the annual growth management plan amendment cycle transmittal public hearings. It will include the public facilities needed to maintain LOS as directed by the Board of County Commissioners upon presentation of the AUIR. The annual budget, which is to be adopted by October 1 of each year shall also include projects and funding as directed by the board upon presentation of the prior AUIR. 3.15.6.4. Establishment of Deficient, Constrained or Backlogged Roadway segments, m-ea .... ~, ..................... ~ .... / 3.15.6.4.1 Establishment of deficient roadway segments, area .... ~.~ { .......-~``,; ...... ;~ ,~``,~--~'-* ~ deficient roadway segment may be defined by the Transportation Concurrency Management System at any point during the year when the cumulative development approvals cause a road segment to exceed its adopted level O servce ca ac . ny o .............. ~ V,'Otlld 1-,. ,.,11,-.,,...,-,-t tO th ...... 1;,...,o ¢ .... ,-,;,q,-..+,~o Of ,-,,,kl;,-. ~',,,-.;1;,., ~-* exceed *~' ..... :.;.... ,.-; ...... ;*.,'- Deficient roadway segments may be defined as constrained or backlogged with provisions of: for limited additional impact as defined in sections 3.15.3.4. and 3.15.3.13. For deficient roadway segments that cannot be defined as constrained or backlogged, no residual capacity trips shall be allotted under a certificate of public facility adequacy for any development that generates more than a dc: .minimis im ap__~L. 18 9/24/02 3.15.6.4.1.1 Sig, nificant impact for development shall be defined as the following: On links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the proiect where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 1% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; For links adiacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is up to and including 3% of the adopted LOS standard service volume; o For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is 5% of the adopted LOS standard service volume. ° The significance test must be carried out for the link(s) directly accessed, all adiacent links and any subsequent links to a point where project traffic drops below 5% of the adopted LOS standard service volume to determine whether project traffic becomes significant again. 19 9/24/02 3.15.6.4.1.2. Establishment of transportation concurrency management system. 3.15.6.4.1.3. General. The transportation concurrency management system shall regulate the timing and amount of development permitted based on available roadway capacity. Il during the issuance of certificates of adequate public facilities for roads, the allotment of reser.'at;.on reserved of capacity will exceed the adopted level of service standard, th~. roadway segment(s) shall be considered to be deficient and subject to the standards ol subsection 3.15.6.4.1. 3.15.6.4.1.4. The Transportation Services Division Administrator shall oversee the development and management of a transportation concurrency management system, which will maintain a current database of existing traffic counts and the reservation of capacity for developments, which obtain certificates of public facility adequacy for roads. The concurrency management system shall be maintained on a monthly basis to reflect current status of development approvals and expirations. The Traffic Concurrency. Procedures Manual and the traffic concurrency management system shall be the basis by which a determination of adequate capacity is available for the issuance of a certificate of public facility adequacy for roads. If, based on the lack of availability of roadway capacity, a proiect is denied a certificate of public facility adequacy in whole or in part, a ~ the applicant may elect to either: modify the application for development approval to maintain the adopted level of service standard; or 2. provide a detailed level of service evaluation beyond that which is the basis of the concurrency management system (but which is consistent with the requirements of the Traffic Concurrency Procedures Manual) to prove that the additional traffic impacts of the proposed development application will not reduce the roadway level of service below its adopted level ct service standard. 20 9/24/02 o Provide that the necessary improvements are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement in which the improvements are completed or under construction before the impacts from the development or phased development accrue to the roadway system. 9" A I~T 1G' T'NT~I"~9". 21 9/24/02 from ............ ;-* ~n4 each ...... ~r .... J -*-r ....... proposed ASt COV~ B .... ~ .......... j .............. d fig .... ~""0; ..... road .... ~ 22 9/24/02 (Ord. No. 94-27, § 3; Ord. No. 96-66, § 3.J.; Ord. No. 99-6, § 3.I.) Sec. 3.15.7. Regulatory program: review of development to ensure adequate public facilities are available. 3.15.7.1. General. In order to ensure that adequate potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, park and road public facilities are available concurrent with when the impacts of development occur on each public facility, Collier County shall establish the following development review procedures to ensure that no development orders subject to concurrency regulation are issued unless adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposed development. 3.15.7.2. Exemptions. The following development orders and development shall be exempt from the terms of this division: 3.15.7.2.1. All valid, unexpired final development of regional impact (DRI) development orders which were issued prior to adoption of the Collier County Growth Management Plan on January 10, 1989, except where: 3.15.7.2.1.1. Development conditions or stipulations applicable to concurrency, or the provision of adequate public facilities concurrent with the impacts of development, exist in the DRI development order; 3.15.7.2.1.2. Substantial deviations are sought for a DRI development order and then this division shall apply only to those portions of the development for which the deviation is sought; 3.15.7.2.1.43. The county can demonstrate pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, that substantial changes in The conditions underlying the approval of the development order have occurred or the development order was based on substantially inaccurate information provided by the developer or that the application of this division to the development order is clearly established to be essential to the public health, safety and welfare; or 3.15.7.2.1.~4. The new requirements would not so change or alter a DRI development order that th~'y would materially or substantially affect the developer's ability to complete the development authorized by the DRI development order. 3.15.7.2.2. Construction of public facilities that are consistent with the Collier County Growth Management Plan. 23 9/24/02 3.15.7.2.43. OriginalT_~emporary construction and development permits and any subsequent renewals not to exceed a cumulative period of one year. 3.15.7.2.$4. Development orders permitting replacement, reconstruction or repair of existing development consistent with all elements of the growth management plan. 3.15.7.2.65. OriginalT_temporary use permits and any subsequent renewals not to exceed a cumulative period of one year. 3.15.7.2.76. Any development order or development whose current owner is entitled to receive, and who properly obtains, a determination of vested rights for adequate public facilities CAPF") in accordance with the provisions of this section. 3.15.7.2.7. 3.15.7.2.76_.1. Application. An application for determination of vested rights for APF shall be submitted in the form established by the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator within six (6) months of the effective date of this ordinance. An application fee in an amount to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners shall accompany and be part of the application. The application shall, at a minimum, include: 3.15.7.2.7-6_.1.1. Name, address, and telephone number of the owner and authorized applicant if other than the owner; 3.15.7.2.76_. 1.2. Street address, legal description, and acreage of the property; and 3.15.7.2.76.1.3. All factual information and knowledge reasonably available to the owner and applicant to address the criteria established in section 3.15.7.2.76_.7. 3.15.7.2.76.2. Determination of completeness. After receipt of an application for determinati-on of vested rights for APF, the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator shall determine whether the application submitted is complete. If he determines that the application is not complete, the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator shall n. otify the applicant in writing of the deficiencies. The Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator shall take no further steps to process the application until the deficiencies have been remedied. 3.15.7.2.76_.3. Review and determination or recommendation by community development and environmental services division administrator and the county attorney. After receipt of a completed application for determination of vested rights for APF, the community development and environmental services division administrator and the county attorney shall review and evaluate the application in light of all of the criteria in 24 9/24/02 section 3.15.7.2.76.7. Based on the review and evaluation, the community development and environmental-services division administrator and the county attorney shall prepare a written recommendation to the hearing officer that the application should be denied, granted or granted with conditions by the hearing officer. Such recommendation shall include findings of fact for each of the criteria established in section 3.15.7.2.76_.7. to the extent that information is represented or obtained or inclusion feasible or applicable. If the community development and environmental services division administrator and the county attorney agree based on the review and evaluation that the application for determination of vested rights for APF so clearly should be granted or granted with conditions, then they may enter into a written stipulated determination of vested rights for APF with the owner, in lieu of the written recommendation to the hearing officer and the provisions in sections 3.15.7.2.76_.4., 3.15.7.2.7-6_.5. and 3.15.7.2.76_.6. However, any such stipulated determination shall be in writing, signed by the community development and environmental services division administrator, the county attorney and the owner, and shall include findings of fact based on the criteria established in section 3.15.7.2.76.7, conclusions of law for such criteria, and the determination granting or granting With conditions, in whole or in part, the vested rights for adequate public facilities. 3.15.7.2.76_.4. Review and determination of vested rights determination for APF by hearing officer. Upon receipt by the hearing officer of the application for determination of vested rights for APF and the written recommendation of the community development and environmental services division administrator and the county attorney, the hearing officer shall hold a public heating on the application. At the hearing, the hearing officer shall take evidence and sworn testimony in regard to the criteria set forth in Ssection 15.7.2.6.7., ......... and shall follow the rules of procedure set forth in 8ec-tio~ F.S. § 120.57(1)(b), 4, 6, 7, andu;.~ ~ ' ~. ,,~,,.*,.,Ul'"*4"l" ,..,,,.,,,~,,~o,~2"~*"~' .... ,.....~ ,~,~,~,.,.,-e~"~;"" F.S. § 120.58(1)(a),(d) and (f);,i S ....... F.S. § 120.58(1)(b), ~ only to the extent that Fie, fi, da Statutes and ~"';^" the hearing officer is empowered to swear witnesses and take testimony under oath. The hearing officer shall follow the procedures established for administrative hearings in Rules 60Q-2.009, 2.017, 2.020, 2.022, 2.023, 2.024, 2.025, 2.027, and 2.031, .F.A.C. ~,4,~ ^ ,~.-~;,;o~-,,~ r-~,~ except as expressly set forth herein. The parties before the heating officer shall include the county, the owner or applicant, and the public. Testimony shall be limited to the matters directly relating to the standards set forth in section 3.15.7.2.6.7.7,2.7.7. The county attorney shall represent the county, shall attend the public hearing, and shall offer such evidence as is relevant to the proceedings. The owner of the property and its authorized agents, may offer such evidence at t. he public hearing as is relevant to the proceedings and criteria. The order of presentation before the hearing officer at the public hearing shall be as follows: 1) the county's summary of the application, written recommendation, witnesses and other evidence; 2) owner or applicant witnesses and evidence; 3) public witnesses and evidence; 4) county rebuttal, if any; and 5) applicant rebuttal, if any. 3.15.7.2.7-6_.5. Issuance of vested rights determination for APF by hearing officer. Within 15 working days after the completion of the public hearing under section 3.15.7.2.6.4.7.2.7.4.~ the Hearing officer shall consider the application for determination 25 9~24~02 of vested fights for APF, the recommendation of the community development and environmental services division administrator and the county attorney, and the evidence and testimony presented at the public hearing, in light of all of the criteria set forth in section 3.15.7.2.6.7.7.2.7.7., and shall deny, grant, or grant with conditions the application for determination of vested rights for APF for the property or properties at issue. The determination shall be in writing and shall include findings of fact for each of the applicable criteria established in section 3.15.7.2.6.7.7,2.7.7., conclusions of law for each of such criteria, and a determination denying, granting, or granting with conditions, in whole or in part, the vested fights for adequate public facilities. 3.15.7.2.7-6.6. Appeal to the Board of County Commissioners. Within 30 days after issuance o~ the Hearing Officer's written determination of vested fights for APF, the County Attorney, the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator, or the owner or its authorized attorney or agent, may appeal the determination of vested rights for APF of the Hearing Officer to the Board of County Commissioners. A fee for the application and processing of an owner-initiated appeal shall be established at a rate set by the Board of County Commissioners from time to time and shall be charged to and paid by the owner or its authorized agent. The Board of County Commissioners shall adopt the Hearing Officer's determination of vested fights for APF, with or without modifications or conditions, or reject the Hearing Officer's determination of vested fights for APF. The Board of County Commissioners shall not be authorized to modify or reject the Hearing Officer's determination of vested rights for APF unless the Board of County Commissioners finds that the Hearing Officer's determination is not supported by substantial competent evidence in the record of the Hearing Officer's public hearing or that the Hearing Officer's determination of vested fights for APF is contrary to the criteria established in Ss_ection 3.15.7.2.6.7.7.2.7.7. 3.15.7.2.76.7. Criteria for vested fights. This section is intended to strictly adhere to and implement-existing case law as they relate to the doctrine of vested fights and equitable estoppel as applied to a local government exercising its authority and powers in zoning, the provision of adequate public facilities concurrent with development (concurrency), and related matters. It is the express intent of Collier County to require application of the provisions of this division to as much development and property in the unincorporated areas of the county as is legally possible without violating the legally vested fights which the owner may have obtained in accordance with Florida common law and statutory law, particularly F.S. § 163.3167(8). The criteria herein provided shall be considered in rendering a vested rights determination under this section. It is intended that each case be decided on a case by case factual analysis. An owner shall be entitled to a positive determination of vested fights for APF only if he demonstrates by substantial competent evidence that he is entitled to complete his development without regard to the otherwise applicable provisions of this division based on the provisions of F.S. § 163.3167(8), or all three of the following requirements of the three-part test under Florida common law: 1) upon some act or omission of the county, 2) a property owner relying in good faith, 3) has made such a substantial change in position or has incurred such extensive obligations and expenses that it would by highly inequitable and unjust to destroy the fights acquired. 26 9/24/02 3.15.7.2.:76.8. Limitation on determination of vested rights for APF. A determination of vested rig's for APF which grants an application for determination of vested fights for APF shall expire and be null and void unless construction is commenced pursuant to a final development order, final subdivision plat, or final site development plan, within two years after the issuance of the determination of vested rights for APF under this section 3.15.7.2.:76., or unless substantial permanent buildings have been, or are being constructe-~ or installed pursuant to a valid, unexpired, final development order of Collier County within two years after issuance of the determination of vested fights for APF under this section 3.15.7.2.7-6_, and such development pursuant to a final development order, final subdivision plat, final site development plan, final subdivision master plan, or planned unit development master plan is continuing in good faith. The aforementioned two-year time limitation on the determination of vested rights for APF shall be stayed during any time periods within which commencement of construction pursuant to a final development order, final subdivision plat, or final site development plan is prohibited or deferred by the county solely as a result of lack of adequate public facilities to serve the property, pursuant to this division. 3.15.7.3. Certificate of public facility adequacy. 3.15.7.3.1. General. A ~ certificate of public facility adequacy shall be obtained concurrently with a~ the approval of the filing for earliest or next to occur of final residential final subdivision plat, final site development plan or building permit. At the time a Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy is issued, all applicable impact fees must be paid into the applicable Trust Fund and will be immediately available to implement "Category A" capital icl dig d "';*~ *~' ~,~.,~.-^~ improvements, n u n roa s time of ........ 1 ,..Ir 3.15.7.3.1.2. Reserved. 3.15.7.3.1.3. Where the proposed development has been issued final subdivision plat approval or final site development plan approval prior to the effective date of this division, a certificate of public facility adequacy shall be obtained prior to approval of the next development order required for the proposed development. 3.15.7.3.1.4. Estimated applicable impact fees for a development shall be paid into the Applicable Impact Fee Escrow Trust Funds in the amount estimated to be due as a prerequisite to the issuance of the building permit(s) for the development upon or prior to 27 9/24/02 issuance of a certificate of public facility adequacy for the development: ~ impact fees into the ~pact Fee Escrow Trust Fund prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall be applied as a credit towads The impact fees calculated and due as a prerequisite to the issuance of the building pe~t(s) for the development. ~pact fees p~d into the ~pact Fee Escrow Trust Fund prior to the effective date of this ordinance shall be refundable upon written request to tbe co--unity development and environmental sewices di~sion ad~nis~ator accompanied by the su~ender of the ofi~in~ ceaificat¢ of public facility adequacy obt~ned prior to issu~ce of buildin~ ~t(s) for the development. Fees p~d as a prerequisite to the issuance of buildin~ pe~t(s) in accordance with the applicable consolidated impact f~ ordnances shall be refundable p~suant to the provisions of such ordinances upon written request to tbe finance director, clerk of couas. 3.15.7.3.2. Rules of general applicability for certificate of public facility adequacy. 3.15.7.3.2.1. Timing. An application for a certificate of public facility adequacy may only be submitted ~ subject to section 3.15.7.3.1.1. 3.15.7.3.2.2. Impact Fees. A complete application for a certificate of public facility adequacy will include the tender of the total amount of impact fees estimated to be due, as determined by the Impact Fee Coordinator, on the development for which a development order application has been submitted. Impact fees will be deposited into the applicable Impact Fee Trust Fund. Final calculation of impact fees due will occur as a prerequisite to the issuance of building permit(s). Additional impact fees may be due prior to issuance of the building permit(s), or a refund from the Impact Fee Trust Fund may be due to the applicant in the case of an overpayment at application for a development order. 3.15.7.3.2.g3. Consolidated application. A building permit, final subdivision plat or final site development plan shall receive final approval only to the extent to which the proposed development receives a certificate of public facility adequacy. The application for a certificate of public facility adequacy may only be submitted with an application for development approval, where appropriate under this division. An application for a Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy will receive final approval and a certificate will be issued concurrently with a final site development plan, final subdivision plat or building permit. 3.15.7.3.2.g.4__ Assignability and transferability. A certificate of public facility adequacy shall run with the land, shall be assignable within a proposed development, and shall not be assignable or transferable to other development. 28 9/24/02 3.15.7.3.2.4.5 Expiration. A certificate of public facility adequacy shall expire three years from t~e date of its approval except to the extent that building permits have been issued for the proposed development for which the certificate is approved or a final residential subdivision plat has been approved and recorded, and the proposed development is then completed pursuant to the terms of the Collier County Building Code._~: Refund of Impact Fees will be subject to the provisions of the Consolidated Impact Fee Trust Fund Ordinance. 3.15.7.3.2.45.1. For large developments as indicated below, a five year Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy may be obtained provided the Developer enters into an enforceable development agreement with the County. For development comprised of more than 500 residential dwelling units, or for a phased increment of development comprised of more than 150 residential dwelling units, or for a commercial/industrial development of more than 100,000 square feet of gross leasable area, a certificate of public facility adequacy shall expire five years from the date of its approval except to the extent that building permits have been issued for the proposed development for which the certificate is approved, and the proposed development is then completed pursuant to the terms of the Collier County Building c,,,,4 3.15.7.3.2.:56. Effect. Issuance of a certificate of public facility adequacy shall demonstrate'~roof of adequate public facilities to serve the development approved in the development order, subject to the conditions in the development order. A subsequent application for development approval for development approved in a development order for which a certificate of public facility adequacy has been approved shall be determined to have adequate public facilities as long as the certificate of public facility adequacy is valid and unexpired. When a certificate of public facility adequacy expires, any subsequent application for development approval shall require a new certificate of public 29 9/24/02 facility adequacy to be issued pursuant to the terms of this section prior to approval of any subsequent development order for the proposed development. Application for approval of a certificate of public facility adequacy for subsequent or continuing development once a certificate has expired shall be based on public facility availability at. the time of the new application. Under no circumstances shall a certificate of public facility adequacy be automatically renewed. 3.15.7.3.3. Effect of development agreement in conjunction with a certificate of public facility adequacy. Upon approval by the board of county commissioners, any applicant may enter into a development agreement with Collier County pursuant to the provisions of F.S. §§ 163.3220--3242, in conjunction with the approval of a development order and/or a certificate of public facility adequacy. The effect of the development agreement shall be to bind the parties pursuant to the terms and conditions of the development agreement and the certificate of public facility adequacy in order to insure that adequate public facilities are available to serve the proposed development concurrent with when the impacts of the development occur on the public facilities. 3.15.7.3.4. Procedure for review of application. 3.15.7.3.4.1. Submission of applications and fees. The. An Application for a Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy r~, ~, ........ *~ except ~,,~ao shall be submitted in duplicate to the Community Development and Environmental Services Division AdministratorThe ,-~r ............ a .......................... s ....-t'---"~ s ........ shall be ~..t...;,,~a to ,t,~ q- ...... ~,:^. c~,:-~.~ r,;.,;~:~.. ^ a.~;.:~,.-~,..~- An application shall be submitted at the filing of the earliest or next to occur of final residential final subdivision plat, final site development plan, or building permit as specifically provided for under subsection 3.15.7.3.1.1. An application fees in an amount to be determined by the Board of County Commissioners shall accompany and be part of the applications. 3.15.7.3.4.2. Application contents. The form and contents for the Application for Public Facility Adequacy except for the road component shall be established by the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator. In all cases, the applicant shall provide a facsimile number at which communications and notifications from the County to the applicant may be sent. The form and contents for the Application for Public Facility Adequacy for the roadway component shall be established by the Transportation Services Division Administrator. Although the application will have two maior components (transportation and all other "Category A" facilities), complete 30 9/24/02 applications in their entirety are necessary to allow proper and adequate review by both the Community Development and Environmental Services Division and the Transportation Services Division. The form and contents for the entire Application shall be published and made available to the general public. 3.15.7.3.4.3. Determination of completeness and review. Upon receipt of an Application for Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy by the Community Development and Environmental Services Division, all copies of the application will be time and date stamped. One copy will be forwarded to the Transportation Services Division for processing no later than the next business day. After receipt of the a~ Application for Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy, the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator and Transportation Services Division Administrator shall determine whether its respective component is complete within five business days. If it is determined that '~' .... ~;"~*: ...... :~ any component of the application is not complete, written notice via facsimile shall be sei:ved-on provided to the applicant specifying the deficiencies. The Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator and Transportation Services Division Administrator shall take no further action on the application unless the deficiencies are remedied. The applicant shall provide the additional information within 60 days or the application will be considered withdrawn and the application fee is forfeited. Within twenty business days after the application is determined to be complete, the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator shall review and grant, or deny each public facility component except for roads in the application pursuant to the standards established in 8section 3.15.7.3.5. The Transportation Services Administrator shall review and grant, or deny a certificate of adequate public facility for roads within twenty business days after the application is determined to be complete. 3.15.7.3.4.4. Appeal to of Public Facilities Determination._ · ^.m,~-.~ r,,,.,.~;,~....,.._,~,,,,,.. Within 30 days after issuance of the determination of the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator and/or the Transportation Services Division Administrator on the Application for a Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy, the applicant may appeal the determination of ............. ~ .....~..,~ to the r,,,r,,;~, r~..;,;,;~ r~,~,~.~.;.~,.,... ^ .... , r,~;,,,,~ the Collier County Board of County Commissioners. A fee for the application and processing on an appeal shall be established at a rate set by the Board of County Commissioners from time to time and shall be charged to and paid by the appl!cant for a third party evaluation. The third party shall be an outside consultant who has been previously approved by the county for the purpose of providing independent review and recommendations on public facility adequacy determinations. The Board of County Conmussmners ...... ^ ....~ r,~;,,~,~ shall hold a hearing on the appeal and shall consider the determination of the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator and the Transportation Services Division Administrator, independent third party testimony and public testimony in light of all the criteria set forth in gs_ection 3.15.7.3.5 cf tSis ordinance. The Board of Count~ Commissioners P"~'~;~' r:~,;~;,:~, r~,~,:~,:~,,, ^ .... ~ c,^~:,,~,~ shall adopt the 31 9/24/02 Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator's and the Transportation Services Division Administrator's determination on the Application for a Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy with or without modifications or conditions, or reject the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator's and the Transportation Services Division Administrator's determination. The Board of County CommissionersPub!ic ~';"*;~ r~.~.-.~;-~.,; ^-.^.vv.~-.~ shall not be authorized to modify or reject the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator's and the Transportation Services Division Administrator's determination unless the Board of County Commissioners o,.~..~. ~.-;,;~ r~,~.-.~.~-~-~ Appeal c,~.-..~a,~ finds that the determination is not supported by substantial competent evidence or that the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator's and the Transportation Services Division Administrator's determination is contrary to the criteria established in gsection 3.15.7.3.5,-^~ *~;~-.,o -,--.-.--~.^~a; ..... The decision of the Board of County Commissioners F,oaa;~o r~,~,~;~,;~,- ^ .... ~ r~,,,~a,~ shall include findings of fact for each of the criteria. 3.15.7.3.4.5. Cancellation of certificates. Upon notification by the Community Development and Environmental Services Division Administrator or his designee and the Transportation Services Division Administrator or his designee, that an application for a Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy has been approved and a Certificate issued, the applicant shall have 39 ca!znd~ 5 business days to pick up the Certificate and pay all applicable impact ~.a .... ,~_. a .... ~ ....,~ fees. th~ ~fl""~""* ~ .... ~;~;.~ ~.a ~ th~ applicant docs not pick up the C~ificate and pay all applicable impact fees within ~ 5 business days of notification by facsi~le by~";c;o~--~ -.~-,~" ~e Cemificate will be voided. In such a case, the applicant shall then be required to apply for issuance of a new Ce~ificate. 3.15.7.3.5. Standards for review of application. The following standards shall be used in the determination of whether to grant or deny a certificate of public facility adequacy. Before issuance of a certificate of public facility adequacy, the application shall fulfill the standards for each public facility component (potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, parks and roads). 3.15.7.3.5.1. Potable water facilities. 3.15.7.3.5.1.1. The potable water component shall be granted if any of the following conditions are met: 32 9/24/O2 3.15.7.3.5.1.1.1. The required public facilities are in place at the time a building permit is issued. 3.15.7.3.5.1.1.2. The required public facilities are under construction at the time a building permit is issued. 3.15.7.3.5.1.1.3. The required public facilities are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of subsections 3.15.7.3.5.1.1.1. and 3.15.7.3.5.1.1.2. 3.15.7.3.5.2. Sanitary sewer facilities. 3.15.7.3.5.2.1. The sanitary sewer component shall be granted if any of the following conditions are met: 3.15.7.3.5.2.1.1. The required public facilities are in place at the time a building permit is issued. 3.15.7.3.5.2.1.2. The required public facilities are under construction at the time a building permit is issued. 3.15.7.3.5.2.1.3. The required public facilities are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of subsections 3.15.7.3.5.2.1.1. and 3.15.7.3.5.2.1.2. 3.15.7.3.5.3. Solid waste facilities. 3.15.7.3.5.3.1. The solid waste component shall be granted if any of the following conditions are met: 3.15.7.3.5.3.1.1. The required pubic facilities are in place at the time a building permit is issued. 3.15.7.3.5.3.1.2. The required public facilities are under construction at the time a building permit is issued. 3.15.7.3.5.3.1.3. The required public facilities are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of subsections 3.15.7.3.5.3.1.1. and 3.15.7.3.5.3.1.2. 3.15.7.3.5.4. Drainage facilities. The drainage component shall be granted if the proposed development has a drainage and water management plan that has been approved by the environmental services division that meets the LOS for Capital Drainage Facilities defined in subsection 3.15.3.26.~3.22. 33 9/24/02 3.15.7.3.5.5. Park and recreation facilities. 3.15.7.3.5.5.1. The parks and recreation component shall be granted if any of the following conditions are met: 3.15.7.3.5.5.1.1. The required public facilities are in place at the time a building permit is issued. 3.15.7.3.5.5.1.2. The required public facilities are under construction at the time of building permit is issued. 3.15.7.3.5.5.1.3. The required public facilities are the subject of a binding contract executed for the construction of those public facilities, which provides for the commencement of actual construction within one year of issuance of a building permit. 3.15.7.3.5.5.1.4. The required public facilities are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of subsections 3.15.7.3.5.5.1.1., 3.15.7.3.5.5.1.2. and 3.15.7.3.5.5.1.3. 3.15.7.3.5.6. Road facilities. The road component shall be considered based upon whether sufficient capacity is available based on the findings of the Transportation concurrency management system.the v,,,v .......... v ................ a .... ~, .......... 3.15.7.3.5.6.1. Development which significantly impacts a roadway (as defined in section 3.15.6.4.1.1.) which is designated as either a constrained or backlogged facility shall be subiect to approval or limitation of development approval consistent with 3.15.3.13.ou .....~ ....c ~;,,,;r,,~,,,, ;,,n ...... r ^ eTx ..... subsection 3.15.3.4. and '* ~: ~ ~ "~' 3.15.7.3.5.6.2. Development which significantly impacts or creates a deficient roadway segment that is not defined as backlogged or constrained shall not be issued a certificate of adequate public facility for roadways unless the application is modified such that the development is limited to not significantly impact the deficient roadway segment; evidence in the form of a detailed evaluation is provided that shows that the proposed level of development will not cause the identified deficient roadway segment to operate below its adopted level of service standard; or the applicant commits in a legally enforceable development agreement to fund and construct the necessary . · · ........ approve 34 9/24/02 road ~" ...... · ,~ ~o~d ........ * chap ~ approved ~"' ~^~ *~' ~"*;^~ ,.c +~ 3 1573563 (Ord. No. 94-27, § 3; Ord. No. 96-66, § 3.J.; Ord. No. 99-6, § 3.I.) Sec. 3.15.8. Liberal construction, severability, and penal provision. 3.15.8.1. The provisions of this division shall be liberally construed to effectively carry out its purpose in the interest of the public health, safety, welfare and convenience. 3.15.8.2. If any section, phrase, sentence or portion of this division is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and such holding shall not effect the validity of the remaining portion. 3.15.8.3. A violation of this division shall be misdemeanor punishable according to law; however, in addition to or in lieu of any criminal prosecution, Collier County shall have the power to sue in civil court to enforce the provisions of this division. (Ord. No. 94-27, § 3; Ord. No. 99-6, § 3.1.) 35 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS October, 1997 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT Symbol Date Amended ** October 28, 1997 (I) February 23, 1997 (11) May 9, 2000 Ordinance No. Ordinance No. 97-62 Ordinance No. 99-13 Ordinance No. 2000-32 This is the EAR-based amendment. Due to the magnitude of the changes - which included reformatting the entire Element, affecting every page of the Element - a Roman Numeral is not assigned. Indicates adopted portions Note: the support document will be updated as current information becomes available. Words ot .... ~'*~' ..... ~' are deletions -Words underlined are additions TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION A. PURPOS£ B. SYST£."5 OVERVIEW FUTURE SYSTEM NEEDS* 1. Land Use Projections* 2. Travel Demand Patterns* 3. Traffic Circulation Constraints* 4. Future Traffic Circulation Map -2000* 5. Future Traffic Circulation Map -2010' 6. Future Traffic Circulation Map -2020* INTERMODAL & MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION* 1. Non-motorized Travel* 2. Aviation* 3. Transit* PERSPECTIVES* 1. Land Use Issues* 2. Marco Island Airport Impacts* 3. Inter-agency Coordination Cooperation* 4. Funding of Roadway Improvements* G. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY* H. GOALS, OBJECTIVES & POLICIES* PAGE TR~N-~ TR~H ? 37 7O 55 Words ctr,..'ckthrc'.-'gh are deletions - Words underlined are additions TABLE LIST OF TABLES/MAPS/FIGURES DA~C tA 1C 2 3 4 r),.~;h_, S,-~n,;,-,,~ XI,-,h ,m~ f,'~r ~+,'~+,~ m,-,,-~,-ic, ;n C,-,ll;,'~r County ....... ,~ ~.,, :r~r~T, j,..,!y os ~ ~no.. FDOT's ^ ..... i Avomgc n..;,,, u,-., ..... f,-. ~,,,-,,-, S+o+,-, ~,q, ,l+;pl~..~,.~ T .... I ~,,,- ii,.;,,+ ...... Arteria!s Existing ii .....p+~hl,. C.-.~,a;,; ..... County Cc,i;... r. .... *,, Tr=nspc,'t.=tion Dl~,.,~;.g r~,~.~,~ C ,-~ n ,-~ #-,;'1'~, A ,,.,olyo;o TRA,N'-I 9 TRA."!-21 'rD A kl-rJ~J TRAN-2~ TR^N-2~ TRA.',!-3.n. At MAP TD_I AAA/ TR-IAE LIST OF MAPS Existing Facility Type Existing F:c!llty Type E=stcrn Cell!ct r. TRA.".'-3 'T'D A I~I_A TRAN-~ TRAN-~ TR-!CW Existing Adopted Love! cf cf e~,,,,;,.,, e,~.~,~- Western C"";"' r, .... ,,, TR-ICE TR-! DW Existing Adopted Lc';cl of Sor.'!co (~.~n,-I~,-,-,l~, I:::,-_,~,~',~,',-, I"'~,ll;~r Existing ' .... '~' ''~ S""";'""' ~^h~,.+,,-, Cc!!icr County TRAN-~ TDAKI 0 ii Words "* .... ~.+h ..... r, are deletions - Words underlined are additions I Iq1' ~-~r' 'T'AI~I r'C~IIHIAI3C~I[:II~-I IDr'q. DA~-I= TR-! -nE TR-! E TR-! F-! TR-! F-2 TR-1 F-3 TR-1 F-~ TR-! F-5 TR-2E 41 LIST OF TABLES/MAPS/FIGURES (continued) Words ~ are deletions - Words underlined are additions MAP (continued) PAGE TR- 7£-1 TR- 7=---2 TR- 7=--3 TR- 7FF.-~ TR- 7£-E MT-!W 7.4 75 Words ttr,cc?J, hrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions D. FUTURE SYSTEMNEEDS 1. Land Uge Przjeet':zr~ Travel Demand demand g ......... b~ p ............ u:e~ ...................... cj t! p ' th r ...... th FPP ~o.-.~ t~.~ ~ ........ wore ...................... ............. years were prepped +~ ...... : .... + --,;+~ *~ !at!on .,~:_. +~ ~r ....... ;~.~a th'~*~ . ..... a .......were prep~ed u~ing a .....................~ c~untywide population ..... ~ ................................................................. full pt The MPO Long Range Transportation Plan's Financially Feasible Plan and Needs Plan as adopted on March 23, 2001, are hereby incorporated to define the major roadway needs fo~' Collier The refinement of these plans to incorporate updates to the MPO's Plan, development of a collector road system and results of corridor specific studies, shall occur on a regular basis upon approval of the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC).. 37 Words ''+ ....~.+k ..... k - ............. ~,. are deletions Words underlined are additions Flcfi~a Debarment cf Tran~pc~adcn: The as~,o ! scr.4cc~ ...... ~""* ~";~ m"~mer ~n angc .................. wag ............................. Financially - ......................... y~ar above. ~u ..... u-~ .c trips ........................... P ........... trip fa ilk) "' .aa:-- a new ....... ;, can ......... p ............................................. ............ quickest some 2_. Traffic Circulation Constraints In many parts of the Naples Urban Area, traffic circulation movements are constrained by the natural features of the landscape such as the Gordon River. Still other parts offer constraints of the man-made variety, such as golf courses and the Naples Airport. In many instances approved developments (some existing, others not yet built) block the way of logical extensions of urban collector and arterial roads. The single most noticeable constraint is the Gordon River as it extends from the Naples Bay northward under the East Tamiami Trail (US 41) to its connection with the Golden Gate canal system. The characteristics of the highway network at this location resembles an "hour-glass". On the western extreme, US 41 and Goodlette Road converge on the narrow "straits" of the Gordon River bridge, while to the east, US 41 and Davis Boulevard do likewise. The result is the t~ical "bottleneck" effect when too much ~ volume is forced through a ~ted area. The other contributing factor to current and future congestion problems is associated with the northwest/southeast configuration of the East Trail (US 41). Because this roadway converges with the east/west and north/south roadways at an angle it has the impact of forcing or "squeezing" the travel demand into the confined area of the Gordon River corridor. This one roadway serves both the north/south and the east/west travel demand in the East Naples area. 38 Words °+ .... ['+~' ..... ~, ~r~. deletions-Words underlined are additions Travelers at the southeastern corner of the Urban Area have only one route into the central City of Naples, i.e., the East Trail, whereas travelers in the northeast reaches of the Urban Area have a multitude of choices along the roadway grid for a route to downtown Naples. In developing plans for new and expanded roadways that make up the long range network, the County has kept in view these natural and man-made traffic circulation constraints. Even though environmental concerns are usually addressed through the permitting process, it is important to consider various highway alternatives in light of the sometimes fragile ecological features. 39 Words ''+ ....L-+~, ..... ~' are deletions - Words underlined are additions The road;;'ay~ ........................ is rep year ......... upon ...... v~r ......... map .v pro;' ,u~ ~.~;~ ~. adding ~rcvement TM~-~---~--- ..... ..,m~, du~ng ............. u ate process projects .............................................. a ~..j ....... 6. ~ Future Traffic Circulation Map g~ - Year 2025 deFicts ,u~ 1 ........ ; ...... ~-:~: ................ ,;~. mutes, ""~ pathway ................. year The. c.., 40 Words°+ .... ~,k ..... k _ ............. ~,, are deletions Words underlined are additions 0 WLLI r ! 0 .J Z E. INTERMODAL & MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION 1. Non-Motorized Travel Today in Collier County, there exists the potential for an integrated network of bicycle and pedestrian facilities that would provide a safe, clean, healthy, and efficient opportunity for travel throughout the urban area. To help create a more balanced and livable transportation system, one that provides for bicycling and walking, Collier County has undertaken new roles and responsibilities not previously performed. The Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan, developed by the Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) staff, was adopted by the MPO in December, 1994. The purpose of the Pathway Plan is to plan for the future needs of bicyclists, pedestrians and other non-motorized travel modes. The Plan is a tool to guide the MPO's Bicycle/Pedestrian Program within six essential areas: (1) establishment; (2) engineering; (3) education; (4) enforcement; (5) encouragement; and (6) economics. These interrelated areas address Collier County's non-motorized issues, constraints, needs and opportunities. The Pathway Plan is currently being implemented in Collier County. The Pathway Plan documents the extent of the existing pathway system. Many of the major highways have sidewalks incorporated into their design. It is a policy of this plan that all future capacity improvements described in this plan shall include provisions for both bicycles and pedestrians. In addition, the Subdivision Regulations of Collier County provide for bicycle and pedestrian facilities throughout a development. The 2020 Pathway Plan also provides for the systematic completion of an integrated system. It is a policy of this Plan that Collier County will annually adopt a 5 Year Pathway Work Program that establishes pathway priorities. The County, to the greatest extent possible, will identify state and federal funds and provide local funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathway Work Program. In addition to providing bicycle and pedestrian facilities, the County will encourage their use, and promote safe bicycle and pedestrian practices through the continued support and implementation of the Comprehensive Pathway Plan. 2. Aviation ...... 1, ...... p! Airp r~,,~,, ....u .... · .......... *":"~ as ............... corn ere separate ort Master Plans were prepared for the Immokalee Regional Airport, Everglades Airpark, and the Marco Island Executive Airport. These plans provide insight as to existing facilities and conditions and make recommendations regarding potential opportunities and necessary future facilities at the three airports. a. Existing Facilities The development of separate master plans for Immokalee Regional Airport, Everglades Airpark, and Marco Island Executive Airport required the collection and evaluation of information relative to each of the airports and surrounding areas including the following: 70 Words et~ are deletions - Words underlined are additions · Physical inventories and descriptions of facilities and services currently provided by each of the airports · Background information pertaining to aircraft fleet mix and historical activity levels · Regional plans and studies potentially affecting future airport development activity Immokalee Regional Airport: The airport is located on a 1,100 acre site in the north-central part of the County, approximately 40 miles northeast of Naples. Located on the northeast side of Immokalee, the airport is only one mile from the Central Business District. Primary access to the airport is via State Route 29 to County Route 846, which intersects with Ah-park Boulevard to the south of the airport. Little development has occurred at the airport since its transfer of ownership in 1960 from the United States Government. Both landside and airside facilities are located at the airport. Landside facilities include the aircraft storage hangars, fueling facilities, etc. Airside facilities included at Immokalee are three runways, each 5,000 feet long and 150 feet wide. Taxiways are available as well. The airside facilities presently available provide for opportunities that are not available at other general aviation airports within the County. The three 5,000 foot runways and pavement strength provide operational capability exceeded only by Naples Municipal Airport. Additionally, only a portion of the 1,100 acres at the Immokalee Regional Airport is currently being used for airfield purposes. Large tracts of land remain available for future development of additional landside facilities and future economic development activity. Everglades Airpark: Everglades Airpark was initially purchased and developed by Collier County in 1968. The airport purchase was funded through monetary assistance provided by the Federal Aviation Administration, a National Park Grant, and Collier County. Little development has taken place since its opening, other than the required maintenance projects. Situated outside the boundaries of Everglades National Park and the Big Cypress National Preserve, the airport is surrounded on three sides by water. The airport is immediately surrounded by lands zoned as areas of environmental concern. Facilities at Everglades Airpark include a single runway that is 50 feet wide and 2,400 feet long, a taxiway, and runway lighting. Parking facilities, fueling and hangar facilities are also available. A terminal building/pilots lounge has been recently constructed, which provides a number of services. Marco Island Executive Airport: In the late 1960's, plans for a resort-oriented area south of Naples were conceived. Deltona, the developer of the Marco Shores project, determined that along with the upscale resort area, an airport was needed capable of accommodating small air carrier and general aviation aircraft. Construction of the airport began in 1972, and was completed in 1976. Through a land swap with the State of Florida, the County recently acquired the airport property in exchange for property within the Fakahatchee Strand. Existing airfield facilities include one runway, which is 5,000 feet long and 100 feet wide, a taxiway, various navigational aids, as well as airfield lighting. Automobile parking facilities are available adjacent to the terminal building. b. Future Potential Opportunities Immokalee Regional Airport: According to the Immokalee Regional Airport Master Plan, a number of factors support the notion that this airport could become a regional airline/aircraft maintenance base in the future. The length, width, and pavement strength of the existing airfield is capable of accommodating nearly all of the aircraft in the national regional airline fleet. There is ample open land available for future development of additional hangar space. 71 Words "* .... L-+~, ..... ~, . ............. ~., are deletions -Words underlined are additions The establishment of the airport in conjunction with the Southwest Florida International Airport as a Foreign Trade Zone (Fl'Z) could provide some opportunities for expanded air cargo operations. The Immokalee Regional Airport can offer space for industrial development and warehousing taking advantage of the Frz. Such services could involve turbo-prop, business jet, or even smaller commercial jet activity. Additionally, the shipping of fresh produce from the airport may be a possibility. Considering the large agricultural base in the Immokalee area, specialty produce opportunities could be developed for movement by air to restaurants and retailers within the region, or nationally. The regional climate may offer an incentive as well for future flight training facilities. The weather in Southwest Florida is ideal for training operations. The airport has the land area available on site to support this type of operation and development of the necessary hangar and terminal facilities. Everglades Airpark: Land and environmental constraints at the Everglades Airpark provide little in the way of increased operations. The general intent of the Everglades Airpark Master Plan is demand-based rather than time-based. This means that reasonable levels of activity potential that are derived from this forecasting effort will be related to planning levels rather than dates in time. The demand levels, combined with airfield limitations suggest that the Airpark will continue to serve primarily single engine and twin-engine piston aircraft. The waters surrounding Everglades Airpark are currently utilized by seaplanes. The waters surrounding the Airpark provide a unique opportunity to increase seaplane operations, by providing daily sightseeing flights and overnight excursions to coastal areas with campground facilities. Marco Island Executive Airport: According to the Marco Island Executive Airport Master Plan, Collier County Airport Authority should continue its efforts on operating the airport as an attractive, efficient, and safe facility. It was recommended that the Airport Authority continue to market and develop the airport as a facility to serve primarily corporate type aircraft indicative of the visitor and resident clientele of the Marco Island Area, and attract and maintain scheduled commuter service for the community. c. Estimated Development Timelines And Costs The development timelines and costs are included in the Master Plans for each of the airports. x~ .....m ......m ~,~ :, ated ;"*~ *~' ...... T pc~at:. ~ .... * *~ ~ ~ea ~ These ..................... ncc~cr .............. ran: cn ................... n The sho~ te~ pla~ing horizon covers ite~ of ~ghest priority as well as items that should be developed as the ai~o~ approaches the short te~ activity ~lestones. Priority ite~ include improvements to safety ~d pavement mintenance. ~so included, ~e improvements to facilities that are inadequate for present demand. Because of thek priority, those ite~ will need to ~ inco~orated ~to County, State, and F~ progra~ng. When shoa te~ horizon activity levels are reached, it will then be time to pro.am for the inte~ediate tern based upon the next activity ~lestones. Sillily, when the intemediate tern ~lestones ae reached, it will then be time to program for the long range. The cost estimtes 72 Words str'Jc~thrc'jgh are deletions - Words underlined are additions within each of the airport master plans were increased by 30% in order to allow for engineering and other contingencies that may be experienced by the project. 73 Words struckthrc'--'gh are deletions - Words underlined are additions (II) 3. Mass Transit a. Purpose ....... ., ~, .... -^ r,~;~ , c,.~a ......r, ......... o o.~..., hitiated deviated Collier County ........ j ....... p :, spcnscred .............. 5 fixed route service for public transportation on February 15,2001. Private services offered in the County are fixed route "trolleys" which operate during the winter season in Naples and on Marco Island, and a network of para-transit providers that offer transportation services to the disadvantaged. The Transportation Disadvantaged (TD) program is coordinated by Collier County, which has been designated as the Coordinated Provider by the Naples Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The TD services offer home pick-up and delivery transportation for the elderly, handicapped, and economically disadvantaged in the County. The "trolley" systems mentioned above are run primarily for the tourist segment of the population and have fixed routes that visit the mai or shopping, beach and hotel interest points. b. Future System Needs On August 3, 1999 the Board of County Commissioners adopted the Public Transportation Development Plan (PTDP), and agreed to become the Governing Agency for Transit in Collier County. The PTDP contains estimates of un-met need in Collier County, both for the existing TD services, and for general public transportation. It contains planning level discussions on demand centers, route locations, vehicle sizes and types of services. .~. ,,-~ .....* .... *- *~, ...... *" The Public Transportation Operating Plan (PTOP) private ....... was adopted by the MPO on December 8, 2000 and by the Collier County Board of County Commissioners on January 9, 2001. It is hereby incorporated by reference. Other services proposed in the start up public transportation system are a vanpool program, circulator service in Immokalee, an Immokalee to Naples shuttle service, and a Commuter Assistance Program. Although the PTPD final report suggested the need for numerous public transportation services in Collier County, the scale and growth rate of the initial system was such that no local funding contribution was predicted to be required until fiscal year 2006. This situation is the result of gradual changes in the requirements for local matching funds that accompany state and federal grant funds. Collier County is already spending funds on public transportation that meet the match requirements. 74 Words "* .... ~'*~' ..... ~' ............. ~,, are deletions -Words underlined are additions F. PERSPECTIVES 1. Land Use Issues The Transportation Element is closely related to the Future Land Use Element. It has long been the pattern that the development of land necessitates improvements and expansion to the transportation system. The two elements are so closely tied, in fact, that changes or shifts in the land use pattems can drastically impact the performance of the roadway system. It is for this reason that the County requires most land development proposals (e.g., DRI, rezone, and provisional use requests) to submit a Traffic Impact Statement. An analysis of the proposal's impact is prepared and submitted to the recommending and approving authorities. As an alternative to this pattern of demand driving the transportation system improvements, the County has begun to explore ways to have the roadway system guide the patterns and densities of development. The County can determine the type of roadway system it wishes to maintain at the adopted level of service and then take steps to permit the type of land uses that will be consistent with that system. In this way, the County will be in a better position to keep the demand for transportation services from outstripping the supply of the roadway system. The County has also recognized the importance of good site planning as it relates to a projects ingress and egress from the major roadway system. Inadequate control of access points, median openings and signalized intersections can accelerate the deterioration of the systems overall level of service just as fast as the increases in traffic volumes. The County has developed and adopted policies to control the number, location and type of access points to the road network. These policies are based on the Collier County Access Management Policy (Resolution No. 92-42) and follow-up Resolution No. 01-246, and existing road and land use conditions. An access management plan map exists for each mixed-use activity center. The purpose of the access management plans is to minimize the adverse impacts to safety, capacity and operating conditions of the roadways, while providing adequate access to those properties. Access points on state controlled roads are subject to approval by the Florida Department of Transportation. 2. Marco Island Airport Impacts The Marco Island Airport, located east of SR-951 approximately 4.5 miles south of US 41 is a facility having a runway length of approximately 5,000 feet. Access to the facility is from SR-951 via Mainsail Drive. The facility currently provides only general aviation services to the southern urban area. Adjacent to the airstrip is the Marco Shores Golf Club Community consisting of a golf course and a phase one residential area of 240 condominium units. All other lands surrounding the facility are under State ownership and are environmentally sensitive. Peak season-peak hour traffic counts taken in 1988 at the intersection of Mainsail Drive at SR-951 reveal 120 vehicles using Mainsail Drive during the period of 8:00a.m. and 10:00a.m. This count would include both residential and airport generated traffic. A 1985 analysis of Marco Island Airport operation is part of the Continuing Florida Aviation System Plan indicates the following current conditions: In 1994, Marco Island Airport had approximately 30 based aircraft with 15,000 annual general aviation operations. By 2005, the facility is expected to have 35 based aircraft and 21,000 annual 76 Words "* .... ~'*~' ..... ~' are deletions - Words underlined are additions operations. The airport has been served by regional airlines in the past. If commercial commuter service was ever resumed it could be expected to generate an additional 8,000 operations per year by 2005. The current limited use of this publicly owned facility places no significant impact on SR-951. 3. Inter-agency Coordination Cooperation In Collier County, the responsibility for providing transportation facilities rests with several different agencies. Long-range transportation planning is the primary charge of the Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The MPO is made uT of !teal ~.._; ..... ;.,;,;~. ~,~. r-^,:~. Cm:nty. staff is housed in the Transportation Services Division, Transportation Planning Department. The Collier County Transportation Planning Department provides staff services to the MPO. The MPO coordinates its planning activities with the City, County, and State Department of Transportation. The programming and construction activities are handled by the City of Naples, City of Marco Island, Collier County, and the Florida Department of Transportation. Each agency's construction programs are monitored by the MPO to ensure inter-agency consistency. 4. Funding of Roadway Improvements In Collier County the pursuit of additional funding for roadway improvements has led to the implementation of numerous funding alternatives. The County has adopted the maximum allowable ~ local option gas taxes in addition to a one-cent voted gas tax. Impact fees for roadway construction were initiated in 1985 and up-dated in 1992 2000, and 2002. Municipal Service Taxing Units have been used to implement area specific projects. On the State level, local governments through the Metropolitan Planning Organization have directed their attention to the under-funded State roads in Collier County. One of the MPO's roles is to ensure that local governments in its jurisdiction rece:.;'e direct equitable treatment ':,':~th~n the I~OT--I~g~ state and federal funding to the highest priority proiects. 77 Words ''+ ....~'" ..... r, ~re deletions -Words underlined are additions G. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY As part of the Transportation Element, the County established minimum acceptable level of service standards on the existing highway system. For me. st County facilities, the level of service standard to be maintained is "D" or "E" as measured on a poak-seaso~ peak hour basis. Several County and State facilities have been given a minimum LOS "E" standard. To maintain the adopted LOS on roadways, the County has implemented a concurrency management regulatory program that ties issuance of development orders to the demonstration of adequate capacity on all roadway segments that would be significantly impacted by new development. In summary this program maintains an inventory of the following for each arterial and collector roadway segment: · Actual traffic on each segment as determined through an annual traffic counting program, · The peak hour service capacity as determined by engineering analyses performed by the Transportation Dlmslon~ and · Capacity that will be used by new development for which a Certificate of Adequate Public Facilities has been issued. In order to prevent sudden unanticipated LOS failures, the County will adopt, within one year or sooner, a "real time .... checkbook accounting" concurrency management process. The process accomplishes this by use of a matrix that evaluates the amount of traffic any development requests to add to a roadway segment based on the relationship between the segment's available capacity and the time improvements to that segment are scheduled in the five year Capital Improvement Program. As existing and permitted traffic on a roadway segment consumes greater than 75% of the segment' s service capacity, the amount of new traffic permitted by new development assigned to it each year is limited in relationship with remaining segment capacity and the year construction of an improvement is in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. Application of the matrix results in metering of project traffic added to each segment once volumes of existing and permitted traffic approach capacity such that by the time a segment reaches capacity, an improvement is under construction. See the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (Section 3.15 of the Land Development Code) for details of this process. 1. Adept tke -. ~ ................ 5 .............................. / .... t' ........... prcjects d t d ig ~-a o ~ mp! ..... mp .......... t proccaa ....................~ cc crc ~" *~ *;~ needed. ~;~ . ..... g:vcs .... t) .... prccedurc *"~" *~ Ccun' year period, operates .............. / ............................. ~ _~ ........ u~ .~, ....:.,% .......... ~ imp ..................... cperadng at accepmb!e level cf 78 Words ~*" ,,.t.+~. ..... h ............. ~.. are deletions -Words underlined are additions · d yea PP fac ' .~ como roa~ WaS ~V~D .................... rc~ W '. .......... years 1. Monitoring Section 3.15 of the Land Development Code is also known as the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (APFO). It describes the annual count program done on County roads to determine their annual average daily traffic (AADT). It describes how the relationship between that AADT and the segment's adopted level of service (LOS) standard determines the road segment' s level of service. The current levels of service at which road segments are operating are reported annually in the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR). This report indicates which segments are operating at levels of service worse than their adopted standard LOS. It also contains predictions of when certain segments will reach levels of service that exceed their adopted standard LOS. Although traffic volumes are expressed as AADT, LOS calculations are done to ensure adequate levels of service. ~ Peak season, peak hour traffic conditions are skewed in Collier County because of the heavy influx of seasonal residents and tourists. As such, it is deemed an inappropriate and unreasonable imposition on tax payers to provide a roadway system designed for the peak of the peak season· Therefore, the LOS calculations are based on traffic conditions experienced for 10 months of the year with the peak seasonal and tourist months of February and March omitted from the analysis. The resulting standard volume is an average of the ten month period. ~ ....... ~ siC!fica implications to issuance ~. development~.~.~'n ...... ...;*k; ...... ........ ~.. _~. ~.~ s cant .......................... road 2. LOS Determination And BCC Findings The~-.~... ....... !.~.~.' v.^r service.~.~.a .... ...... :.-.;--...v.. (c^..~. Count)' roads are ...... as soon ...... pre;':ous The annual average daily volumes will be calculated and the peak hour volume interpreted based upon the available data consistent with omitting February and March tourist months from the. 79 Words o* .... ~'*~' ..... k are deletions - Words underlined are additions analysis. The Transportation ~ Division shall prepare a maintain and update a list of all roadway segments, for which a level of service standard has been adopted, that shows the current LOS r~o 4 .... ;_~4 n~. .... ) as well as the adopted LOS standard found in this plan. Thi: list is F^. .... :.g ,h~ preparatian ~ ,h .... a ...... ~:~* If the volume of traffic of any segments ~ is found to exceed hhei~ its adopted LOS, a report of the ~ Division's findings ccnce:.ing al! cf the Caunty': reads will be transmitted to the Board of County Commissioners. The APFO describes the consequences of a road segment operating at a LOS that exceeds its adopted LOS standard. 2.1 Constrained Roadways Constrained facilities are roadways which have been designated by action of the Board of County Commissioners once it has been determined that the? the facility will not be expanded by two ot more through lanes due to physical, environmental or policy constraints. Physical constraints primarily occur when a roadway is developed to the maximum six lane standard or when intensive land use development is immediately adjacent to roads, thus making expansion cost prohibitive. Environmental and policy constraints primarily occur when decisions are made not to expand a road based on environmental, historical, archaeological, aesthetic or social impact considerations. Constrained roadways are identified by action of the BCC upon the recommendation of the Transportation Administrator. Roadways identified as constrained shall be subject to growth restrictions such that further LOS degradation does not occur once the roadway is determined to be operating below Level-of- Service standard. Constrained roadways are subject to growth restrictions that only allow for an increase in annual daily traffic volume of 10% above the service volume at Level-of-Service standard resulting in LOS operations not to exceed 110% of service volume. Roadways operating at maximum six lane standards can be considered constrained when the facilities exceed 75% capacity. If the standard service volume is exceeded by o,x-c-eeds 110%, ~e~2ni~2s only dc minimis growth wcu!~ could be applied to the roadway segment. 2.2 Backlogged Roadways Backlogged facilities are roadways or segments that are not constrained, they either exceed capacity, or are operating above 75% of the roadway's service capacity without the needed improvement programmed within the year required in the five year Schedule of Capital Improvements as identified in the matrix and process found in the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (Section 315 of the Land Development Code). Backlogged roadways are subject to 5% or 10% growth restrictions annually based on the percentage of capacity available and when the construction phase to add capacity is programmed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements. The AO~rx 4~.~.~. ,~.~ ~' d.e!'.'n.eaSng ...... ~ !~!fi ............... pu~cae ~n d Ii atkng ~ i~ifi mpa g 80 W,.,.~ ,.+ .... t.+~, ..... ~, nr,~ deletions -Words underlined are additions Th: Count) ..................... ............. can ; ....* ~- one ............. segment ..... garters .................... segment man> ....... ' ~o.a ~* ..... *~-- dwa ......... given ..... uso ................... one roa y, functicna! ~.oo;n~.:~- ~.~:~..., ,~ * .... types ~ r~a:.;~o =: fr~ways/expressways. prmol ~ ........ , infiuancz ....................................... g ............... may occur. 81 Words o+ .... ~+h ..... h are deletions -Words underlined are additions GOALS~ OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO PLAN FOR, DEVELOP AND OPERATE A SAFE, EFFICIENT, AND COST EFFECTIVE TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES FOR BOTH THE MOTORIZED AND NON-MOTORIZED MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE AND GOODS THROUGHOUT COLLIER COUNTY. (II) OBJECTIVE 1: The County will maintain the major roadway system,..~.~.~-...~,r~w~"'~;"~ ~...vc .... ,.;g~.._ .... ~y°)o at an acceptable Level of Service by implementing improvements as identified in the annual AUIR or by working directly with other responsible iurisdictions to implement needed improvements to their facilities. Policy 1.1: The County will annually adopt a schedule of Capital Improvements an ^ ..... ~ ~'~ ..... ~ o~.^., r ^ ~rmx covering a period no less than five (5) years, which shall include those projects needed to maintain the network at the adopted Level of Service standard. Policy 1.2: The County shall annually appropriate the funds in the ensuing fiscal year to accommodate those phases of projects listed in the fu-st year of the schedule of Capital Improvements ^ ..... ~ ~'~"~ ....~--~ L".ventc.9' --~rv--° ~.~.. ,.~ ^.~.~.~ ar, ~ Att Programming decisions are based on the AUIR, and annually incorporated in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in the CIE. (Il) Policy 1.3: County arterial and collector roads as well as State highways not on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS) shall be maintained at Level of Service "D" or better as addressed in ph paragra G-1 of the Transportation Element on votam~ except: Level of Service "E" or better shall be maintained on the following designated roadways. Roadway, Airport-Pulling Road Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road US 41 From T_9.o Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Airport-Pulling Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Golden Gate Parkway to US 41 Ai~o:'t Pu!Fmg Rcad US 41 to 1 75 Logan Blvd. Collier Boulevard to Old US 41 Airport-Pulling Road Airport-Pulling Road Davis Boulevard US 41 to Golden Gate Parkway Pine Ridge Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 to Airport-Pulling Road 82 Words ,'t ....t,,~ ..... ~, are deletions - Words underlined are additions Golden Gate Parkway Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 to Airport-Pulling Road Golden Gate Parkway to Radio Road US 41 to Gulfshore Drive Level of Se~ice "D" or ~tter shall be maint~ned on all other county and state a~efial and .... ;~ ~ ~ ~perate ~ ~ .... ' ~ ~';~ "~" for a pe~cd not collector roads, however, ~y o ............. may ~ pmv e ......... ~ The Co!!ie~ Couaty }.n~O Collier County Transpoaation Division shall dete~ne the o~timum b) mom acc~atel) ........ ~-r ac .~.~ ..... ~...,k county .~.a.~.~ :egment. m~;....o .... ,,...;n k~ ~..~ ...... ;~-,;~.,;-- ,ho ~affic volumes ~at co~espond to the different LOS t~esholds on county roads., and ..more to update .................... rang a on counto....~..o,:~-~ ,~.~ ~..~. ..... idea .... pea g .................................. ~ ................. L~ =~ .... , ,~ imp! The c~p .... , ,,,m ~ ....... a ,k~ ~ ;,~ .... ement findings. Transportation Division shall install, as funds pe~t, pe~ent traffic count stations to better identify traffic characteristics of county roads. The Transpo~ation Division shall develop the Capital ~provement Pro.am of the C~ to ~ consistent wi~ the findings to the ~ximum extent financially feasible. (II) Policy 1.4: For the parole of regu!at;mg deve!cpment ^.a~.. r-^.:~ r, ..... y u~ ~..p~ ,~,~ ~,- .... :-- ~ .... ~ of :e:-,'ice "'~"~"-'~ ~- "' .....;~,-;-~-~ -^~o' Collier County sets and adapts the LOS standards for State Roads with the exception of those on the Florida Mtrastate Highway System (F~S). M Collier County ~OT sets the LOS stand.ds for 1-75. The standards for 1-75 ~e as follows: I- 75 US 4! CD QA C~D Existing Transitioning Rural Area Urbanized Area Urbanized Area B C C C t~ D ~ - - SP. 22 G - - ~s~F.~.~ ~...~. P!arming rgan:zat:cn .............. a ....~ , k:.k t ac ~,~-~.a~ in *~ fringe "t ...... t ....... ~ ........ may r~ di 83 Words ............. ~+ .... u+~' ..... u,.~' are deletions -Words underlined are additions (II) (II) OBJECTIVE 2: The County will maintain the adopted Level of Service standard as provided for in Policy 1.3 by making the improvements identified on the Five (5) Year Work Program. Policy 2.1: The County shall include in its Schedule of Capital Improvements in the Capital Improvement Element those projects necessary to maintain the adopted Level of Service on the roads identified on the Five (5) Year Work Program. Policy 2.2: The County shall annually appropriate the funds necessary to implement those projects shown in the annual element (fkst year) of the schedule of Capital Improvements ^ ..... ~ TT~.~ ..... ~ D ~,q- f Alr lTD,\ OBJECTIVE 3: The County shall provide for the protection and acquisition of existing and future fight-of-ways. Policy 3.1: The County has implemented an advanced Right-of-Way Preservation and Acquisition Program. Policy 3.2: The County includes in its annual Capital Improvement Element no !ess t!.an $200,090~ Fer )'ear funding specifically earmarked for use in an advanced Right-of-Way Acquisition Program. ~ December ~nn'L ~-a .... a~a ~;~A;~.ll ..... 1~o ,h., n.,~ ~.o;~ , Studgies shall ~ .................. P 5 ..... a ....7ear ....., ,. conducted peri~ically .to identify the long range right-of way needs of the ~ansponation system pl ~ '~:~ dy, ............ ~ ............ j ~ based on buildout. Following ~ their corn etlon ........ stu '~ ~"-~: ....... :~ ..... ~ ....... ~ ........ ~ .... n .... h~ ~ ..... y' ....... ~ need.the Transportation Ad~nistrator will resent a ro~am of funding ~ ~fl actions to protect and acquke needed fight-of-way. ~ fu~e ~gh[s, ,i~ .~;, ~-~ ~y:~ ~C~uaih g ~e .p romotmn: :afi~ ~m~e~ntatton at . p Ubltel p nva~ pmnersmp~m rese~e::and acqume h~ neefle~ right ~of<~. at ~re~onhble cost. Policy 3.3: ByoT-..v .'°n°~. v, r~.,,;~...~, r~....,y,~ Transportat;.cn Department, Depaament ~-~ '"~ ~":~' County ~"~p~:'~' Planning Orgxni~ticn ~.;,~;. ~.a ;~-, .... ~o~: ..... ;a~,:~ ~- r t ~ way acqu!sitian ....................................... ~ ........... n.~ ....... t p g p Use Element Pa!icy ~.2 and TranspcXatian E!em~nt Pc!icy 7.~) . The County shall acquke sufficient amount of right-of-way to facilitate no less th~ a cross section of (6) ~affic lanes, appropriate turn lanes, medians, bicycle and ~destrian features, drainage canals, and shoulder sufficient for pull offs and landscaping areas. Exceptions to the right-of-way stand~d my be considered when it can ~ demonstrated, t~ough a ~affic capacity analysis, that the mximum number of lanes at build-out will be less than the standard. Policy 3.4: Collier County shall acquire fights-of-way for transportation improvements in fee simple, unless otherwise determined appropriate by the BCC based upon recommendation of the Transportation Administrator. OBJECTIVE 4: 84 Words ctruckthrc'_'gh are deletions - Words underlined are additions (II) (II) The County shall provide for the safe and convenient movement of pedestrians, and motorized and non-motorized vehicles through the implementation of the Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan. Policy 4.1: The County shall, incorporate the Collier County Comprehensive Pathway Plan by reference and update the Plan as needed. Policy 4.2: The County shall provide for support services, and. resources and staff within the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization to coordinate the Bicycle/Pedestrian Program. Policy 4.3: The County shall provide an interconnected and continuous bicycle and pedestrian system by making the improvements identified on the 2020 Pathway Facilities Map series as funds permit. The County's pathway construction program should be consistent with the Comprehensive Pathway Plan. The Pathway Advisory Committee shou4at-P~4d~ shall, to the maximum extent feasible, .. provide recommendations on the choice of projects to be included in the pathway construction program, and the order in which they are constructed. Policy 4.4: The County shall annually adopt a 5 Year Pathway Work Program which establishes pathway priorities to retrofit existing streets to accommodate bicycles and pedestrians. Policy 4.5: The County shall, to the greatest extent possible, identify state and federal funds and provide local funds for the implementation of the 5 Year Pathway Work Program. Policy 4.6: The County shall provide for the safe movement of motorized vehicles through implementation of its Land Development Code and highway design standards ordinances and shall incorporate 5ot~ bike lanes, and sidewalks and pathways as deemed appropriate in new construction and reconstruction of roadways. Policy 4.7: The County and will not shall incorporate bike lanes in roadway resurfacing projects as is physically possible result in a safety or operational problem. Policy 4.8: The County shall follow the most current bicycle and pedestrian facilities design and construction standards developed by the Florida Department of Transportation to the extent which is physically and safely possible. OBJECTIVE 5: The County will coordinate the Transportation System development process with the Future Land Use Map. Policy 5.1: The County Commission will review all rezone requests with consideration of their impact on the overall system, and shall not approve any such request that significantly impacts a roadway 85 Words o* .... t,+~, ..... ~, are deletions-Words underlined are additions segment already operating and/or projected to operate ~ at an unacceptable Level of Service unless specific mitigating stipulations are approved. Traffic analyses to determine project impact shall be defined as follows to determine the study area: (II) Policy 5.2: (II) (II) OBJECTIVE 6: The County shall coordinate the Transportation Element with the plans and programs of the State, Region, and other local jurisdictions. Policy 6.1: The Transportation Element shall incorporate to the greatest degree possible, the long range plans of the Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization. Policy 6.2: The Transportation Element shall consider any and all applicable roadway plans of the City of Naples, City of Marco Island, Florida Department of Transportation, Southwest Florida Regional Planning Council and Lee County. Policy 6.3: The Transportation Element shall be consistent in its interface into the arterial/collector system within the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island. Policy 6.4: The Transportation Element shall consider the State's adopted Five (5) Year Work Program, the Florida Transportation Plan, and the State Land Development Plan. Policy 6.5 86 Words ,s~r~_~reu~ are deletions - Words underlined are additions The Collier County MPO's adopted Long Range Plan has identified a need for an interchange at 1-75 and Golden Gate Parkway and a grade separated overpass at Airport Pulling Road and Golden Gate Parkway. An D ~, ....... ~: m ...... ~,; .... ~ ...r.~;,,~.~ ,~ ,~ ~e~ F2ghway Ad~Jnk~ad~n by October OBJECTIVE 7: The County shall develop and adopt standards for safe and efficient ingress and egress to adjoining properties, as well as encourage safe and convenient on-site traffic circulation. On August .~, ~ ......... ..................................... ~ ....... capac:ty. Collier County shall apply the standards and criteria of the Access Management Policy as adopted by Resolution and as may be amended to ensure the protection of ~e a~erial and collector system's capacity and inte~ty. Policy 7.2: The County shall require the submission of a neighborhood traffic impact assessment as a part of all rezone and conditional use applications. This study will analyze the proposed project's impact on surrounding neighborhood streets. Policy 7.3: The County shall implement, through its Zoning Ordinance, the provision of safe and convenient on-site traffic flow and the need for adequate parking for motorized and non-motorized vehicles as a primary objective in review for Planned Unit Developments, Site Development Plans, and other appropriate stages of review in the land development applications process. Policy 7.4: The County shall develop corridor management plans (see ou~ ~ ....... T ~,,~1 TT~ 1:~1 .... +\ that take into consideration urban design and landscaping measures that will promote positive development along the major arterial entrances to the urban area. Such plans shall take into account the Community Character Plan and the initiatives of Smart Growth as the Board of County Commissioners may annually appropriate funding for these plans. Policy 7.5 ...... ~rcv: .~. a ccmFrehen=k'e an to .......... ~, -...t .................... g .................. a!vng m ~r sequence ~- roadway ~.u ....... ,~ ~_a F ....,:., ~,,,a:.~ sources. The County shall develop Coffidor Access M~agement Plans. Such plans shall be desired to rake median m~ifications and other operational improvements, including removal of traffic signals, necess~ to recapture lost capacity and enhance safety. OBJECTIVE 8: The County shall establish and maintain a "Concurrency Management System" scheduling, funding, and timely construction of necessary road facilities. for the Policy 8.1 87 Words ~'+ ....~'+~' ..... ~' are deletions-Words underlined are additions Each year, the county will use short term projections of previous years' traffic volume growth to estimate the year in which LOS deficiencies will occur on county roads. This information will be used to prepare the annual update of the county's schedule of Capital Improvements Cap;.ta! imi~rcvement ~] ..... ~: ..... ao in a manner that ensures the maintenance of concurrency on road facilities. Policy 8.2 Pursuant to Chapter 163.3180 F.S., and in accordance with the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (Land Development Code Section 3.15), development proposals shall be required to submit traffic impact analyses, the ~ tcta! n-,:m~er cf new tr:.ps generated ~2,' the de:,e!cpment . The methodology for preparing acceptable traffic impact analyses is found in the Collier County Traffic Concurrency Analysis Policy and Procedures Manual. OBJECTIVE 9: The County shall encourage neighborhood involvement and safe and pleasant conditions for the residents, pedestrians, bicyclists and motorists on neighborhood streets, not classified as arterials or collectors through the implementation of the Collier County Neighborhood Traffic Management Program (NTMP). Policy 9.1 The County shall incorporate the Neighborhood Traffic Management Program by reference and update as needed. Policy 9.2 The County shall provide for support services, resources and staff to coordinate the Program. Policy 9.3 The County shall e~ac-oum~ require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate ~ convenient movement throughout the Icca! road network. ........................ prcmcte t~ca ra c. Policy 9.4 The County shall define on a project by project basis, the acceptable amount of rerouted traffic as a result of a traffic management project Policy 9.5 The County shall route through traffic to the major roadways designated in the Transportation Element of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. Policy 9.6 The County shall review impacts on emergency vehicle access or response time to neighborhoods. Policy 9.7 Roadways listed in ^pp~_a;~ ^ ,,o~ ....... ;~ t-^u;~ r, .... , .....r,~.~;.4~a · ~ ~;~;*;~" are net e!:~g:~b!e fcr tke NT~,~. identified as collector or ~efial facilities ge not eligible for the NTMP. Policy 9.8 88 Words "* .... ~'+~' ..... ~' are deletions -Words underlined are additions The County shall cmp!oy consider a variety of traffic calming devices to achieve the NTMP'S objectives for a project. Such traffic calming devices shall be planned and designed in conformance with sound engineering and planning practices. Primary funding for such plans shall come from the local funding initiatives such as MSTUs or MSTBUs for the area to benefit from the traffic calming. Policy 9.9 To implement the NTMP, certain procedures shall be followed in processing neighborhood traffic management requests in accordance with applicable codes and related policies and within the limits of available resources. At a minimum, the procedures shall provide for: - submittal of project proposals; - evaluation of proposals by staff; - citizen participation in plan development and evaluation; - methods of temporarily testing traffic management plans when needed; - communication of any test results and specific findings to area residents and affected neighborhood organizations before installation of permanent traffic calming devices; and appropriate County Commission review. OBJECTIVE 10 The County shall encourage safe and efficient mobility for the rural public. Policy 10.1 The County shall develop a program to examine the maintenance and operational needs of the rural roadway system. This program will address the mobility needs of the rural resident to include the availability of roads for rural-to-urban travel, as well as for hurricane evacuation purposes. Policy 10.2 The County shall continue to improve transit services for the Transportation Disadvantaged in the rural areas through the Community Transportation Coordinator (CTC). (II) Policy 10.3 The County shall incorporate herein by reference the Corridor Management Plan for the Tamiami Trail Scenic Highway, which formed part of the application for Scenic Highway designation authorized by the Board of County Commissioners on November 3, 1998. OBJECTIVE 11 The County shall maintain County owned environmentally compatible facilities airport facilities as attractive, efficient, safe, and Policy 11.1 The County shall incorporate by reference the Immokalee Regional Airport, Everglades Airpark, and Marco Island Executive Airport Master Plans. Policy 11.2 The Collier County Airport Authority shall determine the most cost effective and efficient means for implementing future facility plans outlined within the airport master plans. OBJECTIVE 12: The County shall encourage the efficient use of transit services now and in the future. 89 Words ''+ ....~'*~' ..... b ar~. deletions - Words underlined are additions (Il) Policy 12.1: The Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization, through the Transportation Disadvantaged Program shall assist the local community transportation coordinator in the implementation of the most efficient and effective level of service possible for the transportation disadvantaged. (II) Policy 12.2: The County shall coordinate the development and maintenance of transit development plans with Organ:zat:v.. the Cc!!;.cr r, .... ,., xs .... ~^"*-- Plann:.ng ' '~- Collier County Transportation Division and the Florida Department of Transportation. (II) Policy 12.3 . · Collier County ~s..~_vp~u.--~_.~_ Planr2ng ©rgan:zat:on ~,.~n ~.: .... u .... ~ ~.~ ~ ement:ng a ....... sygtem .................................... plans, shall ~ the manag~g authority of the Collier Mea Tr~sit (CAT) system. Policy 12.4: The County shall, in recognition that the potential for public transit service between Bonita Springs in Lee County and Naples exists, consider any intergovernmental efforts necessary. (II) Policy 12.5: The County shall participate in the MPO planning process through an interlocal agreement with the City of Naples and the City of Marco Island, and in a Joint Participation Agreement with the FDOT. Policy 12.6: The County will participate in the MPO planning process by ma~.nta:.n:.ng a vedng ~resence Tecb. n:~za! Ad;';.r.o%' ...................... as a voting presence on the MPO Board and its' Technical Advisory Committee (TAC). Policy 12.7: Following the adoption of any transit development plan, the County shall initiate the development of transit right-of-way and corridor protection strategies, including ordinances and policy additions. Policy 12.8: Any adopted transit development plan shall include an acceptable level of service standard for transit facilities. Policy 12.9 The County shall include capital expenditures for any adopted transit development plan in the Capital Improvement Element. (II) Policy 12.10 The County shall incorporate herein by reference the most recent Public Transportation Development Plan and Public Transit Operating Plan adopted by the Board of County Commissioners. ~" August 3, ~ nr~n ~.a ,~.~ D..V.n~ ~ .... ;, C, .... ,:~ m~ ~a^p,~a on Januar7 9, 90 Words str,jckthro'Jgh are deletions - Words underlined are additions Collier County Traffic Concurrency Procedures Manual Procedures for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Analyses for Concurrency 1.0 Introduction This document presents the procedures that must be followed to obtain a Certificate of Transportation Capacity. The Collier County Transportation Facilities Concurrency Management System is an integral part of the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, which is found in Section 3.15 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for guidance in the overall concurrency management program. Note that other public facilities such as potable water supply, wastewater treatment, solid waste disposal, drainage and parks must be also provided to all new development at the adopted level of service. Obtaining a Certificate of Transportation Capacity is only one step in the development approval process. Please see the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, which is found in Section 3.15 of the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) for guidance in the overall concurrency management program. In addition to obtaining a Certificate of Transportation Capacity an applicant must also obtain a Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy pursuant to the provisions of Section 3.15 of the Collier County LDC. Note that the application for a Certificate of Public Facility Adequacy as well as for the Certificate of Transportation Capacity must be submitted to the Community Development and Environmental Services Division as prescribed in Section 3.15. Because the process of determing the impacts of a development project on roadway facilities is so different than the other "concurrency facilities", the Community Development and Environmental Services Division accepts the application for a Certificate of Transportation Capacity and then forwards it to the Transportation Services Division for review, analysis and determination of whether adequate roadway capacity exists to serve a proposed project at the adopted Level of Service (LOS) and to keep a running tab on remaining capacity available as trips are assigned to the roadway system. The primary purpose of this manual is to provide the appropriate technical guidance and delineation of the procedural process that must be followed by staff and applicant in order to determine that a project is compliant with the Collier County Transportation Facilities Concurrency Management System. It is the purposes of this manual to guide a process that will: A. Provide adequate levels of services on transportation facilities for existing use as well as new development in Collier County. B. Provide adequate transportation facilities that achieve and maintain county standards for levels of service as provided in the comprehensive plan. C. Ensure that the County's level of service standards are achieved concurrently with development as required by the Growth Management Plan. 2 D. Establish and maintain a concurrency database as necessary to implement the reporting and concurrency determination requirements of the Collier County Land Development Code and the Collier County Comprehensive Plan. E. Identify and eliminate existing infrastructure capacity deficits as necessary to accommodate new development and redevelopment. F. Identify and provide for the availability of public facilities and services needed to support development concurrent with the impacts of such development. G. Provide recommendations and propose annual revisions to adopted Level of Service Standards. Identify and prioritize capital improvements funding of Collier County to the extent necessary to maintain LOS standards and support the five-year schedule of capital improvements. The Collier County Transportation Facilities Concurrency Management System is intended to provide Collier County with the procedures to meet the requirements of an effective growth management program. Implementation of this manual will service as a mechanism for ensuring growth is managed in a manner consistent with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan. 1.1 Applicability and Use Except as otherwise provided in section 1.2 of this manual (Exemptions), it is intended that the manual shall be applicable to all development of land within the jurisdiction of unincorporated Collier County, Florida. 1.2 Exemptions The concurrency review requirements of this manual shall not apply to the following types of construction, which are exempt from Part III of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance (3.15.7.2) and may commence development without presenting an application for a Certificate of Transportation Capacity: 1) Development for which impact fees were collected prior to the effective date of this Ordinance Amendment so long as the original proposal has not been modified. 2) Renewals of previously issued, but unexpired permits. 3) Phases of projects that were disclosed by the applicant and subject to a concurrency test as part of the original application (i.e. phased development). 4) Improvements or additions to a single-family residence, including but not limited to, screen rooms. 5) The replacement of an existing or previous dwelling unit when no additional dwelling units are created. 6) Replacement structures which have the same impact on public facilities as the original structure. 7) Amenities such as pools, fences, walls and signs. 8) Temporary construction trailers. 9) Wells and septic tanks. 10) Remodeling, such as moving a wall, if no change in use, addition of units, or interior completion of a "shell only" structure is involved. 11) Driveway or parking lot repaving. 12) Change of electrical service. 13) Reroofing of existing structures. 14) Repair or replacement of mechanical systems, wiring or plumbing. 15) Use permits and right-of-way permits that do not increase the needed capacity of public facilities. 16) Any sub-permit to new construction. 17) Permits for historical documentation. 18) Sign permits. 19)Utilities such as telephone switching stations, electrical power substations and radio towers that create no additional impact on public facilities. 20) Tree removal permits. Note that even projects that have been determined to be exempt from the requirements of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance must submit a traffic impact analysis so that the project's traffic may be accounted for in the concurrency management system. 4 1.3 Revisions The Transportation Planning Department will have prime responsibility for issuing revisions to this manual as warranted to maintain the manual's currency with required processes and procedures, and compliance with changes to the County Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code. 2.0 Administrative Requirements Primary administrative responsibility for implementation of the requirements of this manual rests with the Director of the Transportation Planning Department or his/her designee. The Director shall: A. Establish and maintain a current database inventory of existing roadway levels of service as defined by this manual, and ensure that said database includes the available capacities for each roadway which shall be updated at a minimum on a monthly basis. B. On a yearly basis a report of the status of public facilities and services covered under this system to the Local Planning Commission and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners (BCC) and recommend a schedule of improvements for those facilities found to have existing deficiencies. This shall be part of the integrated Capital Improvements Program (CIP) submitted for budget consideration and approval. C. Periodically (at least quarterly) advise the LPA of any projected or predicted deficiencies which should be addressed in order to avoid the degradation of established Level of Service Standards (LOS) on any particular system or facility. This advisory will include all roadway segments whose current capacity has reached 75% of its available capacity. D. Provide information on the Internet to applicants and/or affected parties regarding the capacity of services and facilities covered by this Manual and such information will include: roadways segments. Available capacity for roadways by segment. Existing and adopted Levels of Service for all impacted systems, including 3. Improvements to be made to impacted systems as indicated in the Improvement Plans or programs of the entity responsible for such system. Capital E. Provide other information and/or guidance to applicants, County Staff or other affected parties in the day-to-day administration and implementation of the process and procedural aspects of this Manual. 5 2.1 Application Process The Transportation Planning Department will receive the applications for transportation concurrency determination from the Community Development and Environmental Services Division and assure that they are technically complete. An incomplete application will be returned to the applicant with written notice of all deficient items within five (5) days of the receipt of the application by the Transportation Planning Department. Upon receipt of a technically complete application, the Division will indicate the time and date on the application and forward the application and all relevant materials to the Transportation Services Division concurrency staff for analysis, review and the determination of whether road capacity exists. Each application will be reviewed on a first-come, first-serve basis. As each determination is made, transportation capacity (if available) will be temporarily reserved until the final disposition of the development order on which the application was based. Application for expansion to existing development will be reviewed only for the impact of expansion. If the application is approved, the reservation becomes permanent upon payment of the capacity reservation fee. The reservation fee must be paid within five (5) calendar days of the final disposition of the underlying development order. Reservations become binding for a period of three years from the date of approval. At which time, if construction of the project has not begun, the Developer loses the reservation fee. Any application for capacity reservation must begin anew after refund. If an application cannot be approved because of temporary reservations preceding it, it may remain in the system until the temporary reservations are converted to permanent or released to the pool. The concurrency status of an application which remains in the system because of temporary reservations preceding it will be determined no later than 10 days following the disposition of the temporary reservations that caused the application to be held in the system. In cases where two or more applicants are in need of the same facility that is near capacity, the first application received will have first priority in the determination. An application that is ready for final disposition can supercede the temporary reservation of an application ahead of it only if sufficient capacity is available to serve both the initial application and the superceding application. If the application is returned to the applicant for revision, the application must be amended as required and resubmitted within 45 days. If the application is not resubmitted within the 45-day time frame, the transportation concurrency application will be eliminated from the system. If the capacity of available roadways does not meet concurrency requirements the application for determination will be denied. The applicant must then select one of the following options: 1) Accept a 15-calendar-day encumbrance of transportation facilities that are available, and within the same 15-calendar-day period, amend the application to reduce the needed roadway facilities to the capacity that is available; or 2) Accept a 60-calendar-day encumbrance of transportation facilities that are available, and within the same 60-calendar-day period, arrange to provide, an enforceable facilities 6 3) agreement approved by the Transportation Services Administrator for the public road facilities that are not otherwise available; or Accept a temporary encumbrance of public facilities that are available and, within 30 calendar days, provide the County with alternate data that demonstrates additional capacities are available or impacts are less than calculated by the County sufficient to provide the capacity needed. The County will have, at a minimum, 10 working days and a maximum of 20 days to review the alternate analysis submitted. The County reserves the right to accept or reject any alternate analysis submitted. If the alternate analysis is not submitted within 30 days, the application will be eliminated from the system; or 4) S) Reapply for a Certificate of Transportation Capacity at a later date; or Appeal the denial of the application for a Certificate of Transportation Capacity pursuant to the provisions of 3.15.3.7.3.4. The requested capacities will be temporarily encumbered pending the final disposition of the appeal. 6) Accept denial of the Certificate of Transportation Capacity. Upon receipt from the Community Development and Environmental Services Division, the Transportation Planning Department will have 5 working days to review for completeness. 3.0 Traffic Impact Analysis Methodolo~.v A primary purpose and use of this manual is to assist in the determination as to whether a proposed new development or re-development activity can or will be supported and served by infrastructure facilities or services at prescribed levels (See LOS Table, Attachment Al) The evaluations, analyses and quantitative methods described in this Manual are designed to estimate the impact of a proposed project or infrastructure. The Traffic Impact Analysis shall be performed only for the specific property, uses, densities and intensities based on information provided by the applicant. The applicant or their representatives for all new construction will prepare the Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) report for all new projects including vested projects but excluding exempt projects. A TIA, consistent with the following format, is to be prepared and submitted to the Transportation Services Division for approval. Existing Conditions The existing conditions of the proposed project property are to be described including location, closest signalized intersections, existing land uses and existing ingress/egress. 7 o o Proposed Project Explain the proposed project or project phases including land uses, number of units, floor area, seats and/or pump islands, etc. and the expected date development to be fully occupied. Trip Generation Trip generation typically will be based on the rates or equations (whichever is most appropriate) contained in the latest available edition of the publication Trip Generation published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. Assume 100 percent occupancy for all land uses. If the ITE Manual is not applicable or does not address the land use requested, explain the methodology used in detail (if a survey is to be used, consult Transportation Services Division concurrency staff for appropriate methodology before continuing). An existing trip generation credit is given to the property's prior use if in existence within five years of the TIA. Trip generation information should be presented in the TIA as Table 1 in the format below. The Transportation Services Division concurrency staff is to be consulted to determine if AM peak hour, PM peak hour and/or if other study hour should be used depending on the establishment. LAND USE TABLE 1 TOTAL PM PEAK HOUR PROJECT TRIP GENERATION ITE LAND DU (RES) OR/ FORMULA/ USE CODE SQ. FT. (NON-RES) RATE (or other units) PEAK HOUR TRIPS a. Enter/Exit Split Use the percentages of vehicles entering and exiting the project in the PM peak hour provided in the ITE Manual, if available and appropriate. If the ITE data are not appropriate, explain the methodology used (consult the Transportation Services Division concurrency staff for appropriate methodology). The enter/exit split of trips generated by each land use during the PM peak hour should be presented in the TIA report as Table 2 in the following format. TABLE 2 ENTER/EXIT BREAKDOWN OF TRIPS DURING P.M. PEAK HOUR TOTAL PERCENTAGE P.M. TRIPS LAND USE TRIPS ENTER/EXIT ENTER/EXIT b. Internal Capture (applicable only to some mixed use projects) Estimate the total number of external PM peak hour trips entering and exiting resulting from each land use at build-out (show separately for enter and exit trips). This information should be presented in the TIA report as Table 3 in the following format. Include in the TIA an internal trip matrix or other appropriate diagram that shows the balanced interrelation between captured trips and land uses. 9 TABLE 3 TOTAL P.M. PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL PROJECT TRIPS LAND USE TOTAL TRIPS (FROM TABI .E 2) INTERNAL CAPTURE % P.M. PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL TRIPS TOTAL TRIPS ENTERING PROJECT SITE DURING P.M. PEAK HOUR: TOTAL TRIPS EXITING PROJECT SITE DURING P.M. PEAK HOUR: Co Pass-by Adjustment (This is applicable only to certain commercial land uses) Estimate the total number of non-pass-by trips resulting from each land use at build-out (show separately for enter and exit trips). Present this information in the TIA report as Table 4 in the following format. In addition, attach a map that shows the pass-by trip calculation at each project access point. TABLE 4 TOTAL P.M. PEAK HOUR EXTERNAL NON-PASS BY PROJECT TRIPS LAND USE TOTAL EXTERNAL TRIPS (FROM TABI.E 3) PASS- BY % P.M. PK HR EXTERNAL NON-PASS-BY TRIPS TOTAL NON PASS-BY EXTERNAL TRIPS ENTERING PROJECT SITE IN P.M. PK HOUR: TOTAL NON PASS-BY EXTERNAL TRIPS EXITING PROJECT SITE IN P.M. PK HOUR: ° Trip Distribution and Assignment Describe in detail the basis of the assumptions used in project traffic distribution and assignment. Use of the adopted Collier County MPO model to accomplish this task is encouraged for large projects, and is required for analysis of Developments of Regional Impact (DRI). Create a new sub zone within the model structure at the location of the project and connect the project to the roadway network at the appropriate points. The project's external trips are input to the project zone as productions and/or attractions. Then the model would be run and the "select link analysis" process would be used to assign project trips to the network. Other distribution/assignment procedures, such as intervening opportunities are acceptable, but the specific methodology should be discussed with and agreed to by the Transportation Services Division concurrency staff prior to use in the TIA. Trip distribution by hand may be used for developments where the development will produce less than 500 peak hour trips. 10 The proposed project PM peak hour trip generation will determine the area the trip distribution is to be carried out, as follows: go On links directly accessed by the project where the project traffic is equal to or exceeds 1% of the adopted peak hour LOS standard service volume. For projects exceeding 1%, one link adjacent to the links directly accessed by the project where the project traffic is equal to or greater than 3% and for all subsequent connecting links where the project traffic is equal to or greater than 5% of the adopted peak hour service volume. The analysis must be carded out one link beyond the point where the project traffic drops below 5% of the peak hour adopted LOS service standard to determine whether project traffic becomes significant again due to a reduction in service volume such as would be any subsequent links to a point where project traffic drops below service volume. A segment is identified in the AUIR, but also relates to where a roadway break is made by intersecting arterials or collectors (by functionally classified facilities). A table of the concurrency roadway segments, corresponding segment numbers, current traffic volumes, committed trips and capacities are attached in Appendix Al. It will change monthly as project trips are added, existing traffic counts are updated and service volumes (capacities) are revised. If you wish to obtain an up-to-date electronic file of this list you can email your request to transplanning@colliergov.net. Project traffic for both the peak and off-peak direction must be indicated. Project trips must be indicated on both a map of the study area and Table 5 in the following format. Provide an electronic copy in Excel of Table 5 via disk or email (transplanning@colliergov.net) to the Transportation Services Division concurrency staff. SEGMENT NUMBER TABLE 5 IMPACTED SEGMENTS ROADWAY FROM/TO P M PEAK HOUR SERVICE % SERVICE NAME (SEGMENT) DIRECTION PROJECT TRIPS VOLUME VOLUME o Study Area Map The study area map must clearly show the following: a. Internal traffic circulation plan including track and delivery vehicles b. Any existing or proposed parking areas to serve the proposed project with the number of spaces in each lot clearly shown c. Ingress/egress points to the proposed project 11 Existing and proposed median cuts on all roadways adjacent to the project Project impact on any concurrency roadway segments on which project trips are one percent or greater (or 3% for contiguous segments and 5% for segments thereafter) of the segment capacity at the adopted LOS. The assignment should clearly show the specific roadways or driveways onto which project trips are assigned (unexplained mid-segment reductions in assigned trips due to "trip attenuation" are not acceptable) f. Peak hour traffic 6. Other Transportation Information Provide all necessary Transportation Services Division paperwork including: a. Access Management Plan b. Construction Traffic Plan d. Pavement Marking and Signage Plan e. The external right-of-way) f. Mitigation Strategies g. Intersection Analysis 4.1 2) Determination of Concurrency After the Transportation Services Division concurrency staff receives the TIA report, determination of concurrency and subsequent issuance of a Certificate of Transportation Capacity will be based on the components contained in the Traffic Concurrency Matrix presented on the next page. Projects claiming vesting relative to concurrency must be submitted for determination of vested status and, even if vested, must submit traffic analysis as provided below to secure an adequate public facilities certificate and to update the percent of segment capacity consumed in application of the Traffic Concurrency Matrix for subsequent reviews. 12 Checkbook Balance* Over 105% 100% 95% 90% Traffic Concurrency Matrix Under Construction 5% Backlogged X 5% Backlogged Year of Construction** 2 3 X X 5% X Backlogged 4 5 X X X X Not Programmed X X 10% Backlogged 5% Backlogged 10% Backlogged 5% Backlogged 5% Backlogged 5% Backlogged 5% Backlogged 5% Backlogged 5% Backlogged 85% 80% 75% Under 75% 10% Backlogged 10% Backlogged 10% Backlogged 10% Backlogged 10% Backlogged 10% Backlogged *Assumes Current Traffic Counts (adjusted from permanent count stations + Committed but unbuilt development for which an adequate public facilities certificate has already been issued) + Project Traffic ** Assumes resulting capacity will result in checkbook balance of under 75% of segment capacity being consumed. Key: Dash (-) = No Restrictions B = Designated Backlogged Facility - metered growth X = No growth with sole access to deficient segment or greater that 1% / de minimis impact unless: 1.) Applicant provides a capacity analysis that shows capacity beyond planning level segment capacity (becomes basis for all future consideration/re-defines segment capacity). 2.) Alternative capacity relief is provided. 3.) Project is phased or redesigned to consume only available capacity. Note: Segments may be designated as physically constrained (maximum lane standards) or politically constrained regardless of checkbook balance by action of the BCC upon recommendation of Transportation Administrator. 3) Utilizing the Traffic Concurrency Matrix, determination of concurrency will be made by the Transportation Services Division concurrency staff at the time of Final Subdivision 13 Plat for residential development or Site Development Plan, pursuant to the following requirements: a. The TIA must be performed utilizing the procedures contained herein. Proposals will be reviewed in the order they are submitted and available capacity will be allocated on a "first come, first served" basis. Concurrency will be determined based on the adopted level of service for each roadway or roadway segment. The Checkbook Balance column of the matrix relates the roadway segment's available capacity as the percent of the capacity being utilized by a combination of: i. Existing trips based on current traffic counts and ii. Committed development trips for which an adequate public facilities certificate has already been issued, but for which a building permit has not yet been issued. Once the building permit is issued, the trips will accrue to the system and, as such, be added to the existing traffic counts and removed as a reservation of capacity to avoid the double counting of trips. Co eo fo The Under Construction and 1 through 5 columns represent the years in which a roadway link is programmed for actual construction. The schedule comes from the County's Five Year Capital Budget for Roadway Improvements. The Under Construction column reflects the roadway actually being under construction. A roadway shall be under construction when a contract has been awarded for the improvement. The 1 through 5 columns reflect the five-year sequence of programmed construction. The Not Programmed column reflects that the roadway segment has not yet been programmed in the budgetary process. Within each column, a 10 percent and/or 5 percent provision has been provided for backlogged segments. This amount is an annual allowance for additional trips that represents either 10 percent or 5 percent of the segment's service volume (or service capacity) as the segment's available capacity is consumed and construction phases move forward in the County's Five-Year Capital Improvement Program. Application of the elements of the Traffic Concurrency Matrix shall be as follows: The trips for the project will be generated, distributed and assigned on the roadway network and each roadway segment in accordance with the procedures contained herein. Assignment of trips to roadway segments will continue outward from the project until the study area is covered. 14 ii. iii. iv. Once trips are assigned, the segment being analyzed will combine project trips with the latest trip counts from count stations plus calculated trips assigned to that segment from unbuilt development for which an Adequate Public Facilities certificate has already been issued, but for which no building permit has been issued. These combined trips will be compared to the segment's actual service capacity based on its approved level of service. The resulting percent of utilization will be applied to the Traffic Concurrency Matrix. Each successive review for Adequate Public Facility determination at the time of Final Subdivision Plat or Site Development Plan, will be initiated utilizing the revised checkbook balance, based on updated traffic counts and the capacity reserved by issuance of prior Adequate Public Facility certificates. To find whether the proposed project meets concurrency, the year of actual construction of the roadway segment from the County's Five Year Capital Budget for Roadway Improvements and the percent of roadway capacity currently being utilized (checkbook balance as indicated by existing traffic counts and adequate public facilities certificates issued vs. roadway segment's capacity), plus the project's assigned trips to roadway segments impacted by more than one percent or more must be compared in the matrix. Reading across in the percentage row the percent calculated in ii. above to a juncture where reading down the column representing the year in which roadway construction will take place will reflect the status of concurrency. One of three conditions will exist at the juncture of the segment percent and the date of roadway construction initiation and will be indicated as follows: A dash ("-") indicates that the combination of percent of utilization of the segment capacity and the programmed construction of the segment represent no restrictions on development. Concurrency is met and development may proceed. An "x" indicates that no certificate of adequate public facility shall be issued unless the project can verify that it is vested and, therefore, not subject to concurrency. Unless so vested, no further trips from development whose sole access is to the affected segment or which creates an additional traffic impact greater than one percent may be applied to that roadway segment. A single- family home on an existing lot is exempt from this requirement. Other alternatives for this condition are presented in v. below. o A 10 percent or 5 percent allowance for backlogged segments indicates that this amount of additional traffic is allowable on the roadway segment for a given amount of service volume consumed. 15 As applications consume this percentage and is added on, the roadway segment is then compared to the new percentage for determination of available capacity or restriction. If an "x" is indicated in the matrix for the roadway segment being analyzed, no additional trips can be allocated to this roadway segment from development with sole access directly to the affected segment or which creates a traffic impact to the affected segment greater than one percent. (A single family home on an existing lot is exempt from this requirement.) However, the applicant has, but is not limited to, the following alternatives: The applicant can prepare a capacity analysis to show that capacity is available. The procedures to follow for capacity analysis are described in the next section. If this analysis is accepted by the County as adequate, it will become the basis of service capacity for that roadway segment for all future development requests. 2. The applicant can provide alternative capacity relief such as turn lanes, corridor improvements, signalization, access management improvements etc. Such capacity relief must be demonstrated by an approved operational analysis that supports the additional trips requested. Funding for alternative capacity relief shall be at the expense of the applicant and not subject to impact fee credits. 3. The applicant can provide private funds to advance the construction of the needed improvement if the improvement is programmed in the County's Five-Year Capital Improvement Program (Capital Improvement Element) and can be advanced. Advanced funding shall be implemented through an agreement with the County and be paid back in the year the improvement is programmed by the County. Roadway links that have been designated as "constrained" shall not be allowed to exceed the adopted level of service capacity for the constrained facility by more than 10 percent. Alternative - Capacity Analysis The analysis of roadway level-of-service to determine existing capacity of roadway segments by more in depth analysis techniques is allowable if it is based on nationally practiced procedures. The determination of these methodologies shall be approved by the Transportation Services Division. Approved software for use in determining roadway LOS includes CorSim, Synchro, Highway Capacity Software and Art_Plan analysis. 16 The data collected shall conform to the following criteria such that it is consistent with commonly used data collection activities. Applicants shall collect traffic counts over a minimum of 48 hours on a non-holiday weekday for use in determining existing traffic counts for use in the analysis. The raw counts shall then be adjusted by FDOT or Collier County approved peak season factors and the Collier County or FDOT (depending on available data) axle factors. The use of Collier County axle factors for a given roadway segment may be replaced by comdor specific factors if the applicant chooses to collect track counts over a 72 hour time period for the given roadway segment. K factors shall only come from FDOT, Collier County or neighboring County's permanent count stations in close proximity to the roadway segments being analyzed. D factors may be collected site specific by doing 48-hour traffic counts within the corridor. The use of other traffic data for use in the various softwares shall be collected following the listed procedures: · Turning movement counts - Collected for a minimum of two consecutive peak hours at each intersection necessary · Percent tums - Collected over two consecutive peak hours · Signal timing - Obtained from the Transportation Services Division Any variations from these traffic data collection procedures shall only be approved by the Transportation Planning Director or his/her designee. The Transportation Services Division reserves the right to refuse any analysis that does not meet the minimum requirements or is not consistent with commonly followed data collection or analysis procedures. Level of Service Standards and Mitigation Strategies In conducting transportation concurrency determinations, the standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows: 1) LOS E on the following designated roads: Roads Airport-Pulling Road Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road US 41 Airport-Pulling Road Airport-Pulling Road Davis Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road From - To Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Airport-Pulling Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Golden Gate Parkway to US 41 US 41 to Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard to Old US 41 US 41 to Golden Gate Parkway Pine Ridge Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 to Airport-Pulling Road US 41 to Airport-Pulling Road Golden Gate Parkway to Radio Road US 41 to Gulfshore Drive 17 2) LOS D peak hour on all other County and State highways not on the Florida Intrastate Highway System (FIHS) arterial and collector roads. The following are acceptable mitigation strategies for deficient road conditions subject to specific review and approval by the Transportation Services Division concurrency staff: 1) System improvements, including but not limited to turn lanes, removal of signals, restricting access to overburdened roadways, acceleration/deceleration lanes and intersection improvements. 2) Alternative transportation programs, incentives and disincentives including, but not limited to transit systems, car pools, vanpools, limited parking and staggered work hours. 3) Diverted trips (from deficient roads to roads with acceptable levels of service). 4) Building, connecting, upgrading of roadways to collector roads providing for alternative access. The County reserves the right to accept or reject specific mitigation plans. Pipelining which is the practice of making improvements to roadways that are not below level of service standards is not an acceptable mitigation strategy. 4.2 Granting Concurrency The County shall not issue a Certificate of Transportation Capacity unless there are adequate transportation facilities to meet the level of service standards set forth in the comprehensive plan for existing and approved uses, taking into account the cumulative effects of prior Capacity reservation. 3.3 Certificate of Transportation Caoacity. The Transportation Planning Director or his/her designee upon a finding that adequate capacity exists on all links impacted by the proposed development and the appropriate fee is paid will issue a Certificate of Transportation Capacity. The certificate of Transportation Capacity will be issued at Final Site Development Plan or site development review and will be valid for a period of time as the development order with which it was issued. If the development order does not have an expiration date (i.e., rezoning), the Certificate of Transportation Capacity shall be valid for five years. A Certificate of Transportation Capacity may be extended according to the same terms and conditions as the underlying development order. If the underlying development order is granted an extension, the Certificate of Transportation Capacity, if any, shall also be extended. 18 A Certificate of Transportation Capacity can be extended to remain in effect for the life of each subsequent development order for the same parcel, so long as the applicant obtains subsequent development order prior to the expiration of the earlier development order. A Certificate of Transportation Capacity runs with the land and is valid only for subsequent development orders for the same parcel, and to new owners of the original parcel for which it was issued. A Certificate of Transportation Capacity will expire as the underlying development order expires or is revoked or denied by the County and the capacity has not been extended to a subsequent development order for the same parcel. 3.4 Fees The County will adopt a schedule of fees to be charged for applications for analysis of capacity, and for analyses of alternate data. The County will charge a Certificate of Transportation Capacity fee, which is to be paid within 15 days after approval of the underlying development order. This fee will be in the form of a prepayment of impact fees. The County will adopt the fee schedule. The Certificate of Transportation Capacity fee can be refunded if development does not proceed only if the County or other provider of capacity has not expended or obligated the money for reconstruction costs or construction of public facilities. For a single-family residential subdivision, the Certificate of Transportation Capacity fee may be waived if all required infrastructure (i.e., roads, water and sewer lines) is installed prior to issuance of the first building permit. The required impact fee will be paid upon issuance of a building permit. 19 APPENDIX A1 COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT Prepared By Collier County Planning Services Department Comprehensive Planning Section Prepared for COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS October, 1997 AMENDMENTS TO COLLIER COUNTY GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT SYMBOL DATE AMENDED (I) February 23, 1999 (11) May 9, 2000 ORDINANCE NO. Ordinance No. 99-14 Ordinance No. 2000-31 Indicates adopted portion Note: the support document will be updated as current information becomes available. Words e~ are deletions - Words underlined are additions .I. II. III. IV. V. VI. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS: Roads Projects Drainage Projects EMS Projects Jail Projects Library Buildings Projects Library Collection Government Buildings Projects Parks Projects Water Projects Sewer Projects Landfill Projects COST AND REVENUES PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION ANALYSIS (Support Documents) Public Facility Requirements Capital Improvements Projects Capital Improvement Financing Capacity Collier County School Board Capital Improvement Program Timing & Location of Capital Improvements: Current Local Practices Financing Plan Collier County Fifth Annual Update & Inventory Report (AUIR) on Public Facilities Page CIE -1 CIE - 2 CIE - 17 CIE - 26 CIE - 27 CIE - 29 CIE - 30 CIE - 31 CIE - 32 CIE - 33 CIE - 36 CIE - 42 CIE - 46 CIE - 47 CIE - 49 Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G ± Words ctr,..'ckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions I. INTRODUCTION In 1985 and 1986 the Florida Legislature significantly strengthened the requirements for county and city comprehensive plans. One of the provisions of the Local Government Comprehensive Planning and Land Development Regulation Act is the requirement that the comprehensive plan must contain a Capital Improvement Element to "... consider the needs for and location of public facilities ..." (Section 163.3177(3), Florida Statutes). The Capital Improvement Element (CIE) must identify public facilities that will be required during the next five years, including the cost of the facilities, and the sources of revenue that will be used to fund the facilities. One of the specific requirements of the legislation states that the public facilities that are contained in the CIE must be based on "standards to ensure the availability of public facilities and the adequacy of those facilities including acceptable levels of service." The administrative regulation that implements the statutes defines the phrase "level of service" as "... an indicator of the extent or degree of service provided by ... a facility based on and related to the operational characteristics of the facility. Level of service shall indicate the capacity per unit of demand for each public facility." (Section 9J-5.003 (41), Florida Administrative Code). CIE- 1 Words str,Jc?.thrcu~h are deletions - Words underlined are additions CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT ELEMENT GOALS~ OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES GOAL 1: TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE PUBLIC FACILITIES CONCURRENT WITH NEW DEVELOPMENT IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE AND MAINTAIN OR EXCEED ADOPTED STANDARDS FOR LEVELS OF SERVICE. OBJECTIVE 1.1: Identify and define types of public facilities for which the County is responsible, establish standards for levels of service for each such public facility, and determine what quantity of additional public facilities are needed in order to achieve and maintain the standards. Policy 1.1.1: The County shall establish standards for levels of service for three two categories of public facilities, as follows: Category A public facilities are facilities which appear in other elements of this comprehensive plan, including arterial and collector roads, surface water management systems, potable water systems, sanitary sewer systems, solid waste disposal facilities, and parks and recreation facilities. The standards for levels of service of Category A County provided public facilities shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the County's annual budget, and to the appropriate individual element of this Comprehensive Plan. The standards for levels of service of Category A facilities which are not County provided shall apply to development orders issued by the County and to the appropriate individual element of this Comprehensive Plan, but shall not apply to the County's annual budget. Category B public facilities are facilities for the County's library, jail, and emergency medical services, other gcvernmcnt buildings, ~nd dcpendont fire districts. The standards for levels of service of Category B public facilities shall apply to the County's annual budget, but not apply to development orders issued by the County. r, .... +', '-, +~'" County's ...... ~ budget Public facilities shall include land, structures, the initial furnishings and equipment (including ambulances, fire apparatus, and library collection materials), design, permitting, and construction costs. Other "capital" costs, such as motor vehicles and motorized equipment, computers and office equipment, office furnishings, and small tools are considered in the County's annual budget, but such items are not "public facilities" for the purposes of the Growth Management Plan, or the issuance of development orders. CIE- 2 Words str'--'ckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions Policy 1.1.2: The quantity of public facilities except roadways that is needed to eliminate existing deficiencies and to meet the needs of future growth shall be determined for each non-traffic public facility by the following calculation: Q = (S x D)- I. Where Q is the quantity of public facility needed, S is the standard for level of service, D is the demand, such as the population, and I is the inventory of existing facilities. The calculation will be used for existing demand in order to determine existing deficiencies. The calculation will be used for projected demand in order to determine needs of future growth. The estimates of projected demand will account for demand that is likely to occur from previously issued development orders as well as future growth. (11) The County Commission will review all rezone requests and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall County-Wide density or intensity of permissible development with consideration of their impact on both the variable "D" in the formula Q = (S x D) - I,~.,~o,',4 *~'..,v ....... ~.v.~.,' .~..~-,-~,4 ...... s~,'stom. The County Commission shall not approve any such rezone request or FLUE amendment that significantly impacts · -~*'- ~'"v,...v,. (!) _ ~ roadway,'~v~, ......, ,~, ,.* ~,,~_~ ....... ~, ~.,,+~ .... ,~ _, ,~,~/~. ~, ~.~*~ +~.~ cpcmt~ '"~*~..,., ,,, ...., ~, ,.. -~-,,~-*~ ..... ~*~-- through *~ ...... onnn ..~ ,~.. the BEBR medium range gro~h rate ~~or the variable "D", unless one ~ of the following simultaneously occurs; (11) The adopted population standard used for calculation of "Q" in the formula Q = (S x D) - I is amended based on appropriate data and analysis; The Schedule of Capital Improvements is updated to include any necessary projects that would support the additional public facility demand(s) created by the rezone or amendment to the Future Land Use Element. Significant impact is hereby defined for Section B of this Policy as generating potential for increased County-Wide population greater than 5%1% of the BEBR high medium range population projections for Parks, Solid Waste, Water, Sewer and Drainage facilities, er--as Do There are three circumstances in which the standards for levels of service are not the exclusive determinant of need for a public facility: 1. Calculated needs for public facilities in coastal high hazard areas are subject to all limits and conditions in the Conservation and Coastal Management and Future Land Use Elements of this Growth Management Plan. CIE- 3 Words -* ....~'*~- ..... ~' are deletions - Words underlined are additions (11) Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and repair, remodeling and renovation, will be determined by the Board of County Commissioners upon the recommendation of the County Adm!n!ctr~tor Manaqer. Public facilities that provide levels of service in excess of the standards adopted in this Growth Management Plan may be constructed or acquired at any time as long as the following conditions are met: the facility does not make financially unfeasible any public facility of the same type that is needed to achieve or maintain the standards for levels of service adopted in this Growth Management Plan, and the facility does not contradict, limit or substantially change the goals, objectives and policies of any element of this Growth Management Plan. Any public facility that is determined to be needed as a result of any of the factors listed in Section B and D of this Policy shall be included in the regular Schedule of Capital Improvements contained in this Capital Improvement Element. All capital improvement projects for such public facilities shall be approved in the same manner as the projects that are identified according to the quantitative analysis described in Section A of this policy. Policy 1.1.3: The quantity of traffic capacity on the county's arterial and collector road system, including location, needed to eliminate deficiencies and to meet the needs of future growth shall be determined for each road seqment by one or more of the followinq: A traffic impact analysis to demonstrate adequate capacity as determined by the Transportation Concurrency Management System on road seqments that would be impacted by a development order at the time of approval of the final site development plan (SDP), final subdivision plat or its equivalent. Bo The County Commission shall not approve any rezone requests and or proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), which will generate a volume of traffic equal to or greater than 1% of the minimum Level Of Service peak hour volume of an impacted deficient road seqment, unless specific mitigating stipulations are approved in conjunction with the rezone or amendment to restore or maintain each road segment's adopted level of service. Pel~Policy 1.1.4 The determination of location of improvements to expand public facilities will take into consideration the projected growth patterns as identified in the County's annual population projections. Where applicable, public facility improvements will be coordinated with the capital facility plans of any other governmental entity providing public facilities within Collier County. l~Policy 1.1.5 Public facility improvements within a category are to be considered in the following order or priority: Replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, including repair, remodeling and renovation of facilities that contribute to achieving or maintaining levels of service. B. New facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies in levels of service. CIE- 4 Words ctruc,U, thrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions New facilities that provide the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years, as updated by the annual review of the Capital Improvement Element. In the event that the planned capacity of public facilities is insufficient to serve all applicants for development orders, the capital improvements will be scheduled in the following priority order to serve: 1. previously approved orders permitting redevelopment, 2. previously approved orders permitting new development, 3. new orders permitting redevelopment, and 4. new orders permitting new developments. Improvements to existing facilities, and new facilities that significantly reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility. New facilities that exceed the adopted levels of service for new growth during the next five fiscal years by either: 1. providing excess public facility capacity that may be needed by future growth beyond the next five fiscal years, or providing higher quality public facilities than are contemplated in the County's normal design criteria for such facilities. Pelley-l-,-l~: Policy 1.1.6 The standards for levels of service of public facilities shall be as follows: Category A Public Facilities Arterial and collector roads, including state highways not on the Florida Intrastate Hiqhway System FIHS) A1 ~vv....,*" Roadways: A1.1 Ccunt'/Aarterials and collector roads: Level of Service as indicated "_" below on the basis of peak hour,-peak-seaseR traffic volume: Level of Service "E" on the following designated roads: Roads Airport-Pulling Road Golden Gate Parkway Goodlette-Frank Road Goodlette-Frank Road Pine Ridge Road US 41 From - To Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Airport-Pulling Road to Santa Barbara Boulevard Pine Ridge Road to Golden Gate Parkway Golden Gate Parkway to US 41 ^;,.,-,,--.,~l._D,,ll;n,.., D,-~,~ri US 41 to '--/5 Logan Boulevard Collier Boulevard to Old US 41 Airport-Pullinq Road Airport-Pullinq Road Davis Boulevard Golden Gate Parkway Livingston Road Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 to Golden Gate Parkway Pine Ridqe Road to Vanderbilt Beach Road US 41 to Airport-Pullinq Road US 41 to Airport-Pullinq Road Golden Gate Parkway to Radio Road US 41 to Gulfshore Drive A1.2 Level of Service "D" peak hour, n all other County and State (not on the FIHS) arterial and collector road~. ~' ......... any °~'"*;'"" '''~ '"~'~ may ..... ,,. 3,, .... , .-.~ C~r~;,-,~ ']1:" far ~ r.,,*,,.;,-,,,-I ,-~,-,{' +~ ~v,.-,~l ~-~,~ ~:;c,,-,,-~l ~,~,.-~rc, ~,-~ll,.~a,in,'~ ~1-~,~ ,~l,~f~,-mir~.'~'l'i,~n ~f I ,~,,~1 Cl[- 5 Words str~:ktDre~ aro dolotions - Words undorlinod aro adOitions (I))(11) State and Federal Roads: Collier County sets and adopts the LOS standards for state roads with the exception of those on the Florida Intrastate Hiqhway System (FIHS). In Collier County FDOT sets and maintains the LOS for 1-75. The standards for 1-75 are as follows: 1-75 I I( /1t SR-84 SR-29 SR-82 EXISTING RURAL AREA B URBANIZED AREA C D D D TRANSITIONING URBANIZED AREA C D D D CIE- 6 Words struckthrough are deletions- Words underlined are additions A3 A3.1 A3.2 (I) A4 A4.1 A4.2 A4.3 (I) A5 A5.1 A5.2 A5.3 (11) A6 A6.1 A6.2 A7 A7.1 A7.2 A7.3 Category B B1 (I)(11) B2 B3 B4 County Surface Water Management Systems: Future "private" developments - water quantity and quality standards as specified in Collier County Ordinances 74-50 and 90-10. Existing "private" developments and existing or future public drainage facilities - those existing levels of service identified (by design storm return frequency event) by the completed portions of the Water Management Master Plan as listed in the Drainage/Water Management Subelement of the Public Facilities Element. County Potable Water Systems: County systems County Water District - 185 gallons per capita per day Goodland Water District - 163 gallons per capita per day City of Naples = 163 gallons per capita per day City of Everglades - 163 gallons per capita per day in t~incorporated service area Private potable water systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 1.3.1 of the Potable Water Subelement of this Growth Management Plan. County Sanitary Sewer Systems: County systems: North Sewer Service Area = 145 gallons per capita per day South Sewer Service Area = !2! 100 gallons per capita per day City of Naples = 121 gallons per capita per day i~ ~he!u~m¢o~po~at~se~i~e area Private sanitary sewer systems: Sewage flow design standards as identified in Policy 1.2.1 of the Sanitary Sewer Subelement of this Growth Management Plan. County Solid Waste Disposal Facilities: Two years of constructed lined cell capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years Ten years of permittable capacity at the average disposal rate for the previous five (5) years. County Parks and Recreation Facilities: Regional Park land = 2.9412 acres per 1,000/pop. Community Park land = 1.2882 acres per 1,000/pop. Recreation facilities = ~ $240 capital investment per capita (at-eurre~ cost) Public Facilities: County Library Buildings: 0.33 square feet per capita County Library Collection: 1.35 2.05 books per capita by FY 10 County Jail: 0.0024 beds per capita (2.4 beds per 1000 population) County Emergency Medical Service: .000068 EMS units per capita (1 Unit/15,000 Population) CIE- 7 Words struckthrough are deletions - Words underlined are additions B5 B6.! B6.2 Cl C! .! C! .2 C2 C2.1 C2.2 C3 C3.1 C3.2 /'/I C5.1 C6.! CB.2 C7 ("7 0 County ~'*~'~" ~ .........+ ~' ,a~; .... o ~ ~'~"* "~" capita ~.,,~, ...................... ~ .... ~. square .vv. ~v, County Dependent fire districts: Ochcpcc District Stats Rccrcatlcn CIE- 8 Words struckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions Fx'7 ~ ("7 ~ C8.! C!ty of ~""~"' I ~1 ~ ~n~i~ ~n~r~- !. Basketbal! Co'a~s 2. Baseba~ 7. Fcctba!! Fie!ds g. Hcrccchaa Pits ! O. Pavilions I I Dinnin Ar~ ~ ~ Do~ ~t~ll ~, ,~ CIE- 9 Words struckthreugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions cg o,;,,~,~, o ..... ,;,.,..c_.?.C!~t~: a. .Nc :tandard in !ndu~tn/ t CIE -10 Words str--'ckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY OBJECTIVE 1.2: Provide public facilities in order to maintain adopted level of service standards that are within the ability of the County to fund, or within the County's authority to require others to provide. Existing facility deficiencies measured against the adopted level of service standards will be eliminated with revenues generated by ad valorem taxes and intergovernmental revenues received based on economic activity. Future development will bear a proportionate cost of facility improvements necessitated by growth. Future development's payments may take the form of, but are not limited to, voluntary contributions for the benefit of any public facility, impact fees, dedications of land, provision of public facilities, and future payments of user fees, special assessments and taxes. Policy 1.2.1: The estimated capital expenditures for all needed public facilities shall not exceed conservative estimates of revenues from sources that are available to the County pursuant to current law, and which have not been rejected by referendum, if a referendum is required to enact a source of revenue. Policy 1.2.2: Existing and future development shall both pay for the costs of needed public facilities. Existing development shall pay for some or all facilities that reduce or eliminate existing deficiencies, some or all of the replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, and may pay a portion of the cost of facilities needed by future development. Both existing and future development may have part of their costs paid by grants, entitlements or public facilities from other levels of government and independent districts. Policy 1.2.3: Public facilities financed by County enterprise funds (i.e., potable water, sanitary sewer and solid waste) may be financed by debt to be repaid by user fees and charges for enterprise services, or the facilities may be financed from current assets (i.e., reserves, surpluses and current revenue). Policy 1.2.4: Public facilities financed by non-enterprise funds (i.e., roads, surface water management, parks, library, emergency medical service, and jail, "'*~'"'v., ,v, gcv~rnmcnt w~,,~,.h' ,~ ..... ,~v, --, ,~'~ '~v,.~, .... ,~,'~""+,. ~'", ,, ~ d!ctricts) shall be financed from current assets (pay-as-you-go financing) except as otherwise provided in this policy. Public facilities financed by non-enterprise funds shall not be financed by debt unless such borrowing is the only financing technique available that will enable the County to provide facility capacity sufficient to meet standards for levels of service concurrent with new development. Debt financing shall not be used to provide excess capacity in non-enterprise public facilities unless the excess capacity is an unavoidable result of a capital improvement that is needed to achieve or maintain standards for levels of service. Notwithstanding other provisions of this policy, general obligation bonds approved by referendum may be used for any public facilities to acquire capacity needed within the five year capital improvements plan or for excess capacity. Policy 1.2.5: The County shall not provide a public facility, nor shall it accept the provision of a public facility by others, if the County is unable to pay for the subsequent annual operating and maintenance costs of the facility. CIE -11 Words struckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions Policy 1.2.6: The County shall continue to collect Road Impact Fees for road facilities requiring the same level of service standard as adopted in Policy 1.1 .,~_ of this element in order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance transportation improvements necessitated by such development. (II) Policy 1.2.7: The County shall continue to collect impact fees for Parks and Recreation, EMS and Library facilities requiring the same level of service standard as adopted in Policy 1.1 .,~_ of this element in order to assess new development a pro rata share of the costs required to finance Parks and Recreation, EMS and Library improvements necessitated by such development. Policy 1.2.8: If, for any reason, the County cannot provide revenue sources identified as needed funding for specific projects within the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements, the Growth Management Plan shall be amended based on one or more of the following actions: Remove through a plan amendment facility improvements or new facilities from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements that exceed the adopted levels of service for the growth during the next five (5) fiscal years; Remove from the adopted Schedule of Capital Improvements through a plan amendment facility improvements or new facilities that reduce the operating cost of providing a service or facility but do not provide additional facility capacity; Where feasible, transfer funds from a funded Non-Capital Improvement Element capital project in order to fund an identified deficient Capital Improvement Element public facility. The resulting revisions shall be reflected in the required annual update. Lower the adopted level of service standard through a plan amendment for the facility for which funding cannot be obtained. Do not issue development orders that would continue to cause a deficiency based on the facility's adopted level of service standard. Policy 1.2.9: Collier County will not exceed a maximum ratio of total general governmental debt service to bondable revenues from current sources of 13%. Whereas Florida Statutes place no limitation on the application of revenues to debt service by local taxing authorities, prudent fiscal management dictates a self-imposed level of constraint. Current bondable revenues are ad valorem taxes and State-shared revenues, specifically gas taxes and the half-cent sales tax. The Enterprise Funds operate under revenue bonding ratios set by the financial markets and are, therefore, excluded from this debt policy. CIE-12 Words :tr',J'ckthrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions PUBLIC EXPENDITURES: COASTAL HIGH HAZARD AREA OBJECTIVE 1.3: Effective with plan implementation public expenditures in the coastal high hazard area shall be limited to those facilities needed to support new development to the extent permitted in the Future Land Use Element. In addition, public expenditures shall include the following categories: A. Maintenance of existing public facilities; B. Beach, shore and waterway access; C. Beach renourishment. Policy 1.3.1: The County shall continue to expend funds within the coastal high hazard area for the replacement and maintenance of public facilities identified in the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Policy 1.3.2: The calculated needs for public facilities will be based on the adopted level of service standards and future growth projections within the coastal high hazard area. The Future Land Use Element limits new residential development (thus obligations for infrastructure expenditures) to a maximum of four dwelling units per gross acre within portions of the coastal high hazard area. Policy 1.3.3: The County shall continue to insure that access to beaches, shores and waterways remain available to the public and will develop a program to expand the availability of such including funding options for acquisition= '";*~-; .......... CIE - 13 Words 6, ....~.,~. ..... ~, ............. ~,, are deletions - Words underlined are additions PROVIDE NEEDED IMPROVEMENTS OBJECTIVE 1.4: The County shall coordinate its land use planning and decisions with its plans for public facility capital improvements by providing needed capital improvements for replacement of obsolete or worn out facilities, eliminating existing deficiencies, and future development and redevelopment caused by previously issued and new development orders. Policy 1.4.1: The County shall provide, or arrange for others to provide, the public facilities listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in the "Rcq'.'~r~monts for C~p!t~! !mprovemonts Pro.qrams to Ensure Implementation" section of this Capital Improvement Element. The Schedule of Capital Improvements may be modified as follows: A. The Schedule of Capital Improvements shall be updated annually. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3187, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be amended two times during any calendar year, and as allowed for emergencies, developments of regional impact, and certain small scale development activities. Pursuant to Florida Statutes 163.3177, the Schedule of Capital Improvements may be adjusted by ordinance not deemed to be an amendment to the Growth Management Plan for corrections, updates, and modifications concerning costs; revenue sources; or acceptance of facilities pursuant to dedications which are consistent with the plan. Policy 1.4.2: All Category A public facility capital improvements shall be consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the appropriate individual element of this Growth Management Plan. Policy 1.4.3: The County shall include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget all the public facility projects listed in the Schedule of Capital Improvements for expenditures during the appropriate fiscal year. Projects for which appropriations have been made in the annual budget will not be removed once they have been relied upon for the issuance of a final site development plan, final plat1 building permit or the functional equivalent of each. The County ma:,' ~!so shall include in the capital appropriations of its annual budget additional public facility projects that conform to Policy 1.1.2 (B.@2), 1.1.3 (B2&3) and Policy 1.1.45(C) and (E). Policy 1.4.4: The County shall determine, prior to the issuance of final site development plans1 final plats and building permits, or the functional equivalent of each, whether or not there is sufficient capacity of Category ^ public facilities to met the standards for levels of service for existing population and the proposed development. No final site development plan, final plat, building permit, or the functional equivalent of each, shall be issued unless the levels of service for the resulting development will achieve the standards in Policy 1.1 .~_6, Category A, and the requirements for Concurrency Management as outlined in the policies within Objective 1.5 of this element are met. Policy 1.4.5: Public facilities and services provided by Collier County with public funds in accordance with the 5-year Schedule of Capital Improvements in the Capital Improvements Element will be limited to Service Areas established within the boundaries designated on Map PW-1 titled, "Collier County's Three (3) Water and/or Sewer Districts Boundaries" and PW-3 titled, "Rural Transition Water & Sewer District" appearing in the Public Facilities Element for water and sewer. Road improvements will be provided as CIE -14 Words o+ .... ~-*~- ..... h are deletions - Words underlined are additions nated on Element, County-Wide availability basis. appearing in the All other public facilities and service types will be provided on a CONCURRENCY MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE 1.5: To ensure that public facilities and services needed to support development are available concurrent with the impacts of such development, the County's Concurrency Management System shall be consistent with Chapter 163, Part II, Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-5.0055, Florida Administrative Code. The County shall establish a regulatory and monitoring program to ensure the scheduling, funding and timely construction of Category A public facilities concurrent with, or prior to, the issuance of a building permit to achieve and maintain adopted level of service standards. Policy 1.5.1: The concurrency requirement for the Potable Water, Sanitary Sewer, Drainage and Solid Waste Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System are met: The necessary facilities and services are in place at the time a final site development plan, final plat, building permit, or the functional equivalent of each is issued; or The necessary facilities and services are under construction at the time a final site development plan, final plat, building permit, or the functional equivalent of each is issued; or The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement that includes the provisions of paragraphs A and B of this policy. An enforceable development agreement may include, but is not limited to, development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. The agreement must guarantee that the necessary facilities will be in place when the impacts of the development occur. Policy 1.5.2: The concurrency requirement for the Parks and Recreation and Cpc.-. Spaco Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System are met: A. Compliance with any one of the standards set forth in Policy 1.5.1 A, B and C is met; or At the time the final site development plan, final plat, building permit, or functional equivalent of each is issued, the necessary facilities and services are the subject of a binding executed contract which provides for commencement of actual construction of the required facilities within one year of the issuance of the final site development plan, final plat, building permit, or functional equivalent of each; or The necessary facilities and services are guaranteed in an enforceable development agreement which requires the commencement of the actual construction of the facilities within one year of the issuance of the applicable final site development plan, final plat, or CIE -15 Words struckthrough are deletions - Words underlined are additions building permit, or the functional equivalent of each. An enforceable development agreement may include, but is not limited to, development agreements pursuant to Section 163.3220, Florida Statutes, or an agreement or development order issued pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Policy 1.5.3: The concurrency requirement of the Tr:ff!c C!rc'.'lat!cn Transportation Level of Service Standards of this Growth Management Plan will be achieved or maintained if any one of the following standards of the Concurrency Management System ace is met: A. Compliance with any one of the followinq standards set forth !n Pcl!c!cs ! .5,! .~., B, End C 1. Adequate capacity exists on all siqnificantly impacted roadway segments pursuant to the transportation concurrency management system determination procedure in the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, or 2. Improvements necessary to maintain adequate capacity are under construction, or 3. The necessary improvements are guaranteed in an enforceable and executed development agreement in which the improvements are completed or under construction before the impacts from the development or phased development accrue to the roadway system. B. In areas in which Collier County has committed to provide the necessary public facilities and services in accordance with its five-year schedule of capital improvements, the concurrency requirement of the Tr=ff!c C!rc'--'!~t!on Transportation Level of Service Standards ...... "~ shall be o,.~,; .... ,~ .... ~,,,o~,,,,,~ ;~ o, ,.~ ,~,,, ~,,n .... ~,.g ~,~,,,~o,,~,..-,~ m,, Concurrency..._,hA ........ .--~v.,,v,..* Syctcm, based upon an Adequate Capital Improvements Program and adequate implementing regulations are-met as follows: A Capital Improvement Element and a five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements which, in addition to meeting all of the other statutory and rule requirements, must be financially feasible. Th,. r'~,-,~,~, ,,.,.p ........ , r-, .... * o.,~ O..~.~,,~, ,,,...~ r'~,i*o, ""~"'v'~'"~'"v '"--J '~'"--~ --"-- "'~'---~ ~,~,,~.~,.--~,~,, i.-.,~jvv.~ ,,.v,..v~ ,,, .,,~ .... , ......... program. A five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements which must include both necessa~ facilities to maintain the adopted level of se~ice standards to se~e the new developm )osed to be permi~ed and the facilities uired to eliminate; deficienci; o A realistic, financially feasible funding system based on currently available revenue sources which must be adequate to fund the public facilities required to serve the development authorized by "~ ~'' ';'~':~ ~_-'rm!t a final local development ~rd~ and ~ which public facilities are included in the five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements. A five-year Schedule of Capital Improvements which must include the estimated date of commencement of actual construction and the estimated date of project completion. A ,ti ...... ~r ~N~, ,1~ ~ ~i*~l Im~ .... ~+~ ,,,hi~N .... * N~fr~*0 +hG* ~]l CIE -16 Words str'Jc~thrcugh are deletions - Words underlined are additions 6.5._:, A plan amendment is required to eliminate, defer or delay construction of any road project which is needed to maintain the adopted level of service standard and which is listed in the five-year Schedule of Improvements. (11) Policy 1.5.4: The County shall continue to implement a Concurrency Management System, as identified in the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance No. 96-53, codified in Division 3.15 of the Collier County Land Development Code, which shall include a regulatory program and monitoring system consistent with this Growth Management Plan and consistent specifically with the policies under Objective 1.5 of this Capital Improvement Element. The objective of the Concurrency Management requlatory system for traffic is to insure that the adopted LOS on any roadway segment is not exceeded by new development. For roadway segments operatin.q over 75% of the roadway's service capacity, the concurrency management system will address further impacts to the LOS on the seqment until additional capacity is provided. The monitoring system shall enable the County to determine whether it is adhering to the adopted Level of Service Standards and whether its Schedule of Capital Improvements is adequate. REQUIREMENTS FOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS The Schedule of Capital Improvements on the following pages will eliminate existing deficiencies, replace obsolete or worn out facilities, and make available adequate facilities for future growth. Each project is numbered and named, and its cost during each of the next five fiscal years is shown in thousands of dollars (000). The month and year for actual commencement of construction and the month and year each project will be completed (in service) is indicated. Each project in Category A is consistent with the level of service standards as identified within this element and the appropriate individual element of this Growth Management Plan. Each project in Category B is consistent with the level of service standards as identified within this element. Optional elements were not developed for Category B facilities. CIE -17 Words struc~thro'--'gh are deletions - Words underlined are additions o o o o o o 0 -I o o o o o Io Zm .-I__ o o o o c> o o c> c> I- z ILl UJ .-I Ltl Z uJ 0 0 w 0 z 0 0 >- I- z >' c.> z LU 0 w~ ~ Wz 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 I-. uJ 0 0 0 ~-~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,. ,-I 0 C O ~ ,,, 0 o o~ 00 ~ o o Il. ci o o o o o o o~ m 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 ~0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 CO w 0 O.d 00-~ (5o:0 LU Z'~ LUw ~>- 0 ..-I 0 C) n.' I- 0 0 0 i i 0 0 o~ · -~ o co ~ o o ~ o o o o o ~'~ o ,~ o IAI IAI '0 ~ ~0 o ~ z 0 0 0 ~ z I-= rtl 0 0 Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 n.' LLI .-I 0 Z n- O ~' o~ 0 0 0 O a~) o 0 ~- LU ~ 0 o 0 0 0 zI 0 z 0 I1.1 0 COSTS & REVENUES BY TYPE OF PUBLIC FACILITY) (I)(11) In the table below, the left column itemizes the types of public facilities and the sources of revenue. The center column contains the 5-year (-F-Y-~(FY02-06) amounts of ~ facility specific revenues. The right column is a calculation of the deficit for each type of public facility. All deficits are accumulated as a subtotal. Below the subtotal deficit is the source of additional revenue that will be used by the County to pay for fund the deficit in order to maintain the standards for levels of service listed in CIE Policy 1.1 .,=5._6 (I)(II)COUNTY ARTERIAL & COLLECTOR ROADS LESS Available Revenues: Gas Taxes $ 67,100,000 Road Impact Fees 150,000,000 Carry Forward/Grants/Int. 65,100,000 Revenue Bonds 257,000,000 Balance $539,200,000 $539,200,000 0 DRAINAGE PLANS AND PROJECTS LESS Available Revenues: SFWMD FDEP Naples 326,000 9,874,000 60,000 Balance 18,808,000 10,260,000 (8,548,000) (II)WATER & SEWER SYSTEMS LESS Impact Fees/User Fees SOLID WASTFJLANDFILL Balance Balance 155,422,000 155,422,000 0 (II)PARKS & RECREATION LESS Available Revenues: Park Impact Fees Bonds/Revenue Boating Improvement Funds 44,323,000 750,000 Balance 45,073,000 45,073,000 0 CIE 47- (II)EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICE Less EMS Impact Fees (II)JAIL Balance Balance 6,650,000 2,341,000 (4,309,000) (II)LIBRARYBULDINGS AND BANKS Less Library Impact Fees Balance Balance 15,703,000 6,828,000 (8,875,000) (Il)Subtotal of Facility Specific vs. Costs (II)ADD Non-Facility Specific Revenues: General Fund Revenues Balance (21,732,000) 21,732,000 0 CIE 48- PROGRAMS TO ENSURE IMPLEMENTATION Through continued implementation of adopted land development regulations the following programs have been implemented to ensure that the goals, objectives and policies established in the Capital Improvement Element will be achieved or exceeded. 1. ,.,,;,.~;,.,., o...,.', Development Order Review As part of the review of all applications for final site development plans, final plats, building permits, o_[r the functional equivalent of each, the County will determine whether or not there will be sufficient capacity of Category A public facilities to meet the standards for levels of service for the existing population and for the proposed development in accordance with the requirements of the Concurrency Management System. As part of the review for all development orders havinq ne.qative impacts on Cate.qory A Public Facilities other than final site development plans, final plats, buildin.q permits, or the functional equivalent of each, the County will determine whether or not sufficient capacity of Cateqory A public facilities is planned for construction concurrent with the impacts on levels of service that will be created by the proposed development durinq the next five fiscal years. 32. Impact Fees Impact Fee Ordinances will require the same standard for the level of service as is required by Policy 1.1 .§6. 43. Annual Budget The annual budget will include in its capital appropriations all projects in the Schedule of Capital Improvements that are planned for expenditures during the next fiscal year. ,~t. Semiannual Report The mandatory semiannual report to the Department of Community Affairs concerning amendments to the comprehensive plan due to emergencies, developments of regional impact and selected small developments will report on changes, if any, to adopted goals, objectives and policies in the Capital Improvement Element. 65. Update of Capital Improvement Element The monitoring of and adjustment to the Capital Improvement Element to meet the changing conditions must be an ongoing process. Beginning in August of each year, the element will be updated in conjunction with the County's budget process and the release of the official BEBR population estimates and projections. The update will include: 1. Revision of population projections; 2. Updates of facility inventory; 3. Update of unit costs; Update of facilities requirements analysis to project 10 year needs (by fiscal year) in order to program projects to meet the service standards. 5. Update of revenue forecasts in order to evaluate financial feasibility and the CIE 49 County's ability to finance capital improvements needed to meet the Service standards Revise and develop capital improvement projects for the next five years. The first year's schedule of projects will be incorporated into the County's budget effective October 1st. 7. Update of the public school and health facilities analysis. 7-6. Concurrency Management System The County has established a Concurrency Management System by adoption of the Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance, as amended. The system consists of the following components: Ac The Annual Update and Inventory Report on Public Facilities (AUIR) monitoring roport on the capacity and levels of service of public facilities compared to the standards for levels of service adopted in Policy 1.1.86_ of this Element. The AUIR r-effort summarizes the actual capacity of existing public facilities and forecast the capacity of existing and planned public facilities for each of the five succeeding fiscal years. For the purposes of long range capital facility planning, a ten year forecast of projected needed capacity is also done. These forecasts are based on the most recently updated Schedule of Capital Improvements in this Capital Improvement Element. The annual approval of the AUIR and the identified needed projects and revenues by the Board of County Commissioners -r~.i,, ,,~ ....... ~, ,, ,~_,', .... v,.v,'-', constitutes evidence of the capacity and levels of service of Category. A_public facilities, except roads, for the purpose of issuing development orders during the 12 months following :l:the approval ~ of the AUIR ann'.-'=! ropcrt. Th!c rcpcrt !s *1~,~ ^ ..... ! I Ir,,4~*~ ~,-~1 I ..... '--,,.~, ~,.~ ,-~rf ,-~ D,,h~;,', r~o,-,;I;+;,-.~. (AUI~) .............. ~. .................. ,..wp ............................ The Transportation Concurrency Management System will determine the adequacy of roads impacted by a development at or prior to final approval of site development plan (SDP), subdivision plat or its equivalent. Public facility capacity review. The County shall use the procedures specified in Implementation Programs 1 and 26_ to enforce the requirements of Policies 1.5.1, 1.5.2 and 1.5.3 of this Element. Co Review of changes in planned capacity of public facilities. The County shall review each amendment to this Capital Improvement Element in particular any changes in standards for levels of service and changes in the Schedule of Capital Improvements in order to enforce the policies of this Element. Do Concurrency Management Implementation Strategies. The County shall annually review the Concurrency Management Implementation Strategies that are incorporated in this Capital Improvement Element: Standards for levels of service are applied within appropriate geographical areas of the County. Standards for County-Wide public facilities are applied to development orders based on levels of service throughout the County. Standards for public facilities that serve less than the entire County are applied to development orders on the basis of levels of service within assigned areas. Levels of service are compared to adopted standards for Cateqory A facilities, except roads, in the AUIR. Levels of service for roads are compared to adopted standards by a real time analysis that relates the percentage of the roadway's capacity consumed by existing and permitted development to the schedule for CIE 5o capacity improvements prior to dcvelcpmcnt crdcr approval of the final site development plan {SDP}, subdivision plat or its equivalent.. On an ann'--'a! basls. Anm~ol mnnifnrinn 1o ,,ood rofhz~r fhon noo~_h~,_noo~ m~'~nif,'~rinn f~r tho f,~ll,~A,inn 87. Second 5-year Evaluation and Appraisal Report The required second 5-year evaluation and appraisal report will address the implementation of the goals, objectives and policies of the Capital Improvement Element. The monitoring procedures necessary to enable the completion of the 5-year evaluation include: a. Review of annual reports of the Concurrency Management System; Review of semiannual reports to DCA concerning amendments to the Comprehensive Plan; and Review of annual updates of this Capital Improvement Element, including updated supporting documents. CIE 51