Loading...
Backup Documents 03/17/1998 RREGUI~AR BCC MEETING OF M~CH 17, 1998 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: 7 Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, Ihe several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent a_ction taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a n~ldvi.~ry~bea, rd. / Sign NamL~ ~ --, .'&- -i, ~~ Pr[ntNam~ ~'~ ~~';~~__. Street Address \'~ .*~ I"~"~¢,~ ~t'~ ~ Isles o! Capri. Naples. FL 34113 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken. I respectfully request that you appoint a new advisory board. Sign Name~~ Print Name '~-.,ec ~ ~_.~_~4 i -J),.~/~m' Date Street Address /'E~' i,-',:.~ /-"~--/~"-~" Isles Of Capri;, Naples, FL 341 1 3 7 A To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of lhe conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action laken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new advisory board. Sign Name ~.~'-~c..~rp.~ , , Print Name uate Street Address .~/,~"'/., :~, t"" ' of Capri, Naples, FL 3411-~" To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new advisory board. Sign Name '-"/ ' Print Name -"~. / c-'.;<:. '/ Date Street ^ddress ,_..~C~__~ ~- -~'/~.~, ~ 5' ?- Isles of Capri, Naples, FL 341 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire ^dvisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the eubsequent action laken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new adviso~/board. Print Name ~ Street Address ~ ~"" Isles of Capri, Naples, FL 34113 Date To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new acNis~ board. -'Pnnt Name - Street Address Isles of Capri, Naples, FL 34113 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of Ihs conduct and behavior of various members of Ihs Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action laken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new a..~sory bo_aj, d. Print Name .,z-",~ .,,.:~ .,~-z .~ ~ /~ . Dale Street Address / ?~ ,/~,/' ,? ',~') ,~ c ? ,/"~ ~, & ~d.~, . Isles of Capri, Na"-'-'--'-~les, FL 34113 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new advisory board. Sign Name ~;L'~..~ ,.. . ' - .- ~. ~ t,:, .,z.~.~ - Date Print Name ._/?,~,,~, £ ~ C/,'.',~ ~' ~'z ~ Street Address .~,~ c.. Isles of Capri, Naples, FL 34113 .? To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the eubeequent action taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new advt~ry boar~/p .~ ' ~----/.3 ,,.~ ,') Date Print Name ~ ,~.~ .,-* ~ .i Isles o! Capri, Naples, FL 34113 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of Ihe Isles of Capri Fire Advison/Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action laken. I respectfully request that you appoint a new advisory board. '/'/'" /' ' Sign Name~ ,:. ',' . ~ '/"~ Date PfintName . .'. ,~,, ~ / , .... , Street Address ~"' ~ ~' .*"~ '~, ~.,. · '- t Isles of Capri, Naples, FL 34113 7 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct end behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the sub .,~uentae#~. taken, I respectfully rpquest.lhat you Street Address ~ To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some o! them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new.a~so~boar..d.~ ~ .... . Date Prim Name J' ~ ~.,~c,, "'./)'C:,' --- Street Address ~'~ ,--"~ Isles of Capri, Naples, FL 34113 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new advisory board. Sign Name Print Name Date Street Address -~-:,' ~'~ ~z.~,~.,~. Isles of Capri, Naples, FL 34113 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, lhe several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new advisory board. Sign Name ., ~'.~ ,..:- , .... Date Print Name ,'-/'.*'/.~ .' / -, ,.,' Street Address ;" /'*,.': t.- !' ~* Isles of Capri, Naples, FL 341 13 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: 7 Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new advisory board. , .... ~/1 ~,, ...._ ~,.L, ,.._ ; ...~,,,,~,., Date Pflnt Name Street Address/O~ z- ' "~ .. --...' ~... ' :,' -; ~ Isles of Capri, Naples, FL 34113 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of lhe Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken..~l respectfully request that you appoint a new ~d~~ Sign Name ,,- ~"'*~ - '" - ~ _ , Date P~nt Name ,/_.~~7'~-,~ ~ Isles of Capri, Naples, FL 34~' 13 Print Name..~." ~: ~' ~/~ Street Address ~,~ ~' ~/.. 7 A To: The Commissioners of Collier county: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new,~~board. Sign Name ~ _ ~.. ':-.-~ / .~._/'%' ,~ Date .~',~ ~ ~'~ Isles of Capri, Naples, FL 34113 7 A To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of lhe Isles of Capri Fire Advisonj Board, lhe several charges and complaints filed against some of lhem and the subsequenl action laken, I respectfully request that you apPointanewadv.~, rYboar~. //; . Sign Name--"'~' C~"[-~-J; /~.~/j '" ~ -/3'-- ~ Print Name ~ Street Address .~. ? ~. ¥/~'c ~'?'r~C' Isles of Capr'"'"'""""-~, Naples, FL 34~' 13 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the COnduct and behavior of various members of Ihe Isles of Cal~ri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complainta filed against some of lhem and lhe subsequent action laken, I respectfully requesl that you appoint a new advisory board. Sign Name_ Print Name ~ Street Address Isles of Capri, Naples, FL 34113 Date 7 To: The commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of lhe Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new advisory board. ' Sign Name - . Date Pdnt Name ~Y ~. c _ _. , I', /~. / .. Isles of Capri, Naples. FL 34113 7 To: The Commissioners of Collier county: Because o! the conduct and behavior of various members of Ihe Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, Ihe several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new adyisory board. Print Name .,A'/i~,,,- y /-~ ~. ~..~ ~ ,. ::~- Date Street Address,/Vc~ ~ ~. ,, ~1~' ,:.. - Isles o~ Capri, Naples. FL 34113 % To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of Ihe Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new advisory board. Isles of Capri, Naples, FL 34113 7 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of lhe Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, Ihe several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request lhat you appoint a new~~l~X?rd. Sign Name~ Print Name ~~j~. z._ uam Street Address Isles of ~"~rT, 'Naples, FL 34113 7 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new advisory board. , , Sign Name ~ Date Street Address ~~ Isles of Capri, Naples, FL 341 '!3 To: The Commissioners of Collier county: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges end complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, i respectfully request that you appoint a new.~advisory board. Name Print Name-~.~.~ £' f,v ~ c:~: r' (' f. ~.?~ Date Street Address 1 ':'~' 'T~ < L:~ ~ ~:~ [':~ ~ T- Isles o! Capri, Naples, FL 34113 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new advisory board. Sig :../,,, _. - .zz___~ : ~ ~ .~ / , n Name .... . .:~:, .. . . ~ ,,,. , . ,> / Date Print Name , . .- -" ~i, N'~e's, FL 3411"~' To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior .of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, Ihe several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a new advisory board. Sign Name ~_?',--(~ .,J,z,.,~'~? ~'/'~ Date PrintName.,,/-"p,,~,,,,~, /~ X'~,'.~ Street Address -~ ';¢-.' ~,~,,, '7'~<~ /?/¢ '~"- /'~ '- 7 Isles of Capri, Naples, FL 34113 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request Ihat you appoint a new advisory board. Sign Name ~ Print Name ~". - <3 ~- L 7- Street Address ~ Isles of Capri, Naples, FL 34 113 To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members Ihe Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent ac'lion taken, I respectfully request thai you appoint a n.,e~ advtsol~)board. Sign Name_~/~.:, J'~j, ~c .... ~, .-. Prim Name_,t :~t-~. t~ L~'~?(~/~ '~ ~c~A' 'Diltte" Street Address _ ~. ~.~' ~' .~'~ (.:( 0 ~'~ ~ Isles o! Cap}i, NaiVes, FL 34113- To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of lhe Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, lhe several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request lhat you appoint a new advisory board. Sign Name.. .. t... ~' ~? '. Print Name~~ Street ^ddress ~:---- ,Isles of Capri, aples, To: The Commissioners of Collier County: Because of the conduct and behavior of various members of the Isles of Capri Fire Advisory Board, the several charges and complaints filed against some of them and the subsequent action taken, I respectfully request that you appoint a n~i/'advisory~board. Sign Name ~~""~~,~-,--...,~---',~.' ' '"" ._~-,~' .~,~ Date Print Name Street Address 13 NapLes DaiLy News NapLes, FL 339~,0 Affidavit of PubLication NapLes DaiLy News BOARD OF COUNTY CO~ZSS],ONERS ATTd: NANCY SALOGU8 PO BOX &13016 NAPLES FL .~101-3016 REFERENCE: 001230 80~0 57658407 NOTICE OF PUBLIC flEE State of FLorida County of CoLLier Before the undersigned authority, personaLLy appeared B. Leah, ~o on ~th says that she serves as the Assistant Corporate Secretary of the NapLes DaiLy News, · daily newspaper published at NapLes, in CoLtter ¢o~mty, FLorida: that the attached copy of advertising was published in said newspaper on dates Listed. Affiant further says that the said NapLes DaiLy News is a newspaper published at NapLes, in said CoLLier County, FLorida, and that the said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said CoLLier County, FLorida, each day and has been entered as second class mail matter at the post office in NapLes, in said CoLLier County, FLorida, for a period of 1 year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor proaised any person, firm or coporatton any discount, rebate, coeaission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. PUBLZSNED ON: 03/15 AD SPACE: S2.000 ZNCH FZLEO ON: 03/16/98 N~T~CE OF PUGLIC !~.,EE TING BOARD OF COUNTY C O ~',,', A/, rSSIONER 5, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA TuesdoY,/b'o¢ch 17, 19~ 9:~ A.~ Notice Is hereby given lh~ the Collier Coun% Be~d Of Cmm~ C~mis- stoners will m~t In Board's Chambers on hird ~1~ of ~h~ Admir- ation Building (Bulldl~ F) ~ fha Collier Cou~ Dover ~le~J Co~pJe) Naples, FI~i~, to ~o- dud the business of Ilar Count, ~ the Sf~ed time and C~ies of the aa~ fei said meeting will mode available to press end may be rained ~ the office of ~(. Counlv Administrator, ~ of time. Any per,on who e~ to o~al O ~CI~;~ lhl~ ~d will need o re. c~d of the pr~eed;~ e~olnlng thereto, end eref~e may need~ eh. sure ~ot o ve~m re* ~d ~ ~e ~eedln~ m~e which raced In. cudes ~e tesfl~v evlde~e u~ ~lch ol is to be ~se~ RD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLL~ COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA ~. BERRY CHAIR~AN DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK By:/s' M~ureen Kenyon DepHtV Cler~ k~orch 15 NO. J 123~3 Signature of Affiant , / ~' Sworn to and Subscribed before me this // day of /,'~> COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA Tuesday, March 17, 1998 9:00 a.m. NOTICE: ALL PERSONS WISHING TO SPEAK ON ANY AGENDA ITEM MUST REGISTER PRIOR TO SPEAKING. SPEAKERS MUST REGISTER WITH T~E COUNTY AD~4/NISTRATOR PRIOR TO THE PRESENTATION OF THE AGENDA ITEM TO BE ADDRESSED. REQUESTS TO ADDRESS THE BOARD ON SUBJECTS WHICH ARE NUI' ON THIS AGENDA ~JST BE SUIDfITTED IN WRITING WITH EXPLANATION TO THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR AT ~T 13 DAYS PRIOR TO THE DATE OF THE MEETING AND WILL BE HEARD UNDER · PUBLIC PETITIONS" . ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING T~RETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEKr~ TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICqt RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE ALL REGISTE~R~ PUBLIC SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO FIVE (5) MINUTES UNLESS PERMISSION FOR ADDITIONAL TIME IS GRANTED BY ~TIE CHAIRMAN. ASSISTED LISTENING DEVICES FOR THE HEARING IMPAI~RD ARE AVAILABLE IN ~. COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' OFFICE. LUNCH RECESS SC~RDULED FOR 12:00 NOON TO 1:00 P.M. 1. INVOCATION - Pastor 01son, Shepherd of the Glades Lutheran Church 2. PLEDGE OF ALnF~IANCE 3. APPRCVAL OF AGENDA ANDCONSENTAGENDA Approved and/or adopted with changes 5/0 4. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Approved as presented 5/0 A. February 24, 1998 - Regular meeting. PROCLAMATIONS AND SERVICE AWARDS A. PROCLAMATIONS SERVICE AWARDS Presented 1) Pedro Montero - Pelican Bay Services - 5 years Page 1 March 17, 1998 C. PRESENTATIONS 1) Presentation of a check in the amount of $7000.00 from the Cool Cruisers to benefit the Golden Gate Community Center. To be presented by George Medlin of the Cool Cruisers and accepted by Keith Larson and Janice Elliott on behalf of Golden Gate Community Center. Presented 6. APPROVAL OF CLERK'S REPORT A. ANAI~SIS OF CHANGES TO RESERVES FOR CONTINGF~CIES. PUBLIC PETITIONS Added: B. Alfred Luckerbauer regarding the Isles of Capri Advisory Committee. County An~m{nistrator to provide update re Isles of Capri Advisory Comm{ttee at 3/24/98 meeting. Howard E. Rice, Secretary of the Marco Island Lions Club requesting a waiver of permit fee. Permit fee waived - 5/0 8. COUNTYAI3{~III~II~TOR'S REPORT A. COMMUNITY DEVE. T~)PMENT & ENVIRON~Z~TAL SERVICES 1) Recommendations relative to Ordinance 92-82, as amended, a/k/a The Golden Gate Health Park PUD which, according to the required PUD Status Report, has not commenced construction as defined in Section 2.7.3.4 of the Collier County Land Development Code. (Continued from the meeting of 3/3/98; ~es. 98-74 granting extension to October 1, 1998 - Adopted 5/0 2) Petition C-98-4, Golden Gate Area Chamber of Commerce requesting an after-the-fact permit to conduct the Golden Gate Frontier Days Festival on February 27 through March !, 1998. CP-98-4 - Adopted; Permit fees waived - 5/0 3) Approval of the FY 97/98 Bicycle and Pedestrian Program project list for countywide sidewalk construction. Staff recommendation approved, as amended - 5/0 B. PUBLIC ~O~KS 1) Rescind Award with R & L Industries for the Recycling of Agricultural Plastic at the Immokalee Landfill and negotiate a Contract with Sunshine Excavation for the burial of the material. Page 2 March 17, 1998 Added: Award with R & L Industries rescinded; Staff to issue new RFP for excavation to bury the material. - 5/0 2) Approve the acquisition of services necessary for the design and construction associated with the dredging of Clam Pass prior to May 1, 1998. Approved 5/0 C. PUBLIC SERVICES D. SUP. PORT SERVICES E. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR F. AIRPORT AUTHORITY 9. COUNTY AT"i~RNEY'S REPORT ae Request by County Attorney to advertise ordinance for Interim Governmental Services Ordinance to be heard on 3/31/98 at a 1:00 P.M. Special Meeting 10. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Added: B. Appointments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Alternative Development Group (ADG). Res. 98-75 Appointing Griffith, Kegg, Ward, Guggenheim, Barber & Durham as primaries; Boyd, Pettit, Strain, Conrecode & Staiger to serve as alternates - Adopted 5/0 Discussion re Economic Development Council Staff to provide information at a future BCC Meeting re deferral of i?act fees for up to 6 yrs. for Economic Development Companies that qualify. A. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS B. PUBLIC COMMENT ON GENERAL TOPIC PUBLIC HEARINGS WILLBEHEARD IMM~D~y FOLLOWING STAFF ITEMS 12. ADVERTIS~ PUBLIC HEARINGS - BCC A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN A~END~RNT.q B. ZONING AM]~ENTS Continued to 3/24/98 Page 3 March 17, 1998 Added: Award with R & L Industries rescinded; Staff to issue new RFP for excavation to bury the material. - 5/0 2) Approve the acquisition of services necessary for the design and construction associated with the dredging of Clam Pass prior to May 1, 1998. Approved 5/0 C. PUBLIC SERVICES D. SUPPORT SERVICES E. COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR F. AIRPORT AUTHORITY 9 . COUNTY ATTORNEY' S REPORT ao Request by County Attorney to advertise ordinance for Interim Governmental Services Ordinance to be heard on 3/31/98 at a 1:00 P.M. Special Meeting 10. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ae Added: B. Appointments to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Alternative Development Group (ADG). Res. 98-75 Appointing Griffith, Kegg, Ward, Guggenheim, Barber & Durham as primaries; Boyd, Pettit, Strain, Conrecode & Staiger to serve as alternates - Adopted 5/0 Discussion re Economic Development Council Staff to provide information at a future BCC Meeting re deferral of { .m?act fees for up to 6 yrs. for Economic Development Companies that qualify. 11. OTHER ITEMS A. CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS B. PUBLIC COMMENT ON GENERAL TOPIC PUBLIC HEARINGS WILL BE HEARD IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING STAFF ITEMS 12. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS - BCC A. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AKENDMENTS B. ZONING AMenDMENTS Continued to 3/24/98 Page 3 March 17, 1998 1) CONTINUED FROM THE MEETING OF MARCH 10, 1998 AND FURTHER CONTINUED (NO DATE) - Petition PUD-97-18, Karen Bishop of Project Management Services, Inc., representing Signature Communities, Inc., requesting a rezone from RMF-6, RMF-12(6), and RMF-12ST(6) to PUD to be known as The Dunes Planned Unit Development for a maximum of 531 multi-family dwelling units for property located on the northwest corner of 111 Avenue North (Bluebill Avenue a/k/a C.R. 846) and Vanderbilt Drive (C.R. 901). 13. BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS A. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS 14. STAFF'S COMMUNICATIONS 15. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' COMMUNICATIONS A. Discussion re tower space for emergency broadcasts. Be Discussion re programs for middle school and high school students during spring break and summer vacation. 16. CONSENT AGENDA - Ail matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one motion without separate discussion of each item. If discussion is desired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. Approved and/or adopted with changes 5/0 A. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1) Approval for recording the final plat of "Marker Lake Villas" With Stipulations 2) Approval of Budget Amendments reducing the budget for the CDBG Grant for Shellabarger Park (Fund 121, Cost Center 138755, Projects 33020 and 33021) by $583,000. 3) Deferral of 100% of the impact fees for a 124 unit affordable housing project to be built by a Florida limited partnership known as Saxon Manor Isles Apartments affordable rental units and subordination of lien. Resolution 98-70 4) Approval of a refund of road impact fee in the amount of Page 4 March 17, 1998 $4,032.73. 5) Approval of Excavation Permit No. 59.634 Tim Jacobsen excavation located in Sec. 32, T48S, R28E, bounded on the north by 16 Ave. NE right-of-way; on the east by (]olden Gate canal right-of-way; and on the south and west by vacant lots. 6) Appointment of a representative to the Southwest Issues Group (SWIG) of the Governor's Commission for a Sustainable South Florida. Co ..... issioner Mac'Kie appointed as representative and Vince Cautero as alternate Continued to 3/24/98 7) Approval for recording the final plat of "Glen Eden One" ' Phase B. PUBLIC WORKS 1) This item has been deleted. 2) Approve a Cooperative Agreement with the South Florida Water Management District for the Maintenance and Operation of Three Replacement Bridges at Bay West Nursery, Rose Lane and Nursery Lane over the Cocohatchee Canal. 3) Recommendation for the addition of equipment to the Auction List scheduled for March 21, 1998. 4) Cooperative AGreement with Big Cypress Basin/South Florida Water Management District for Cost-Sharing Design of Phase i Lely Area Stormwater Improvement Project. C. PUBLIC SERVICES 1) Authorize a youth basketball team to represent the Collier County Midnight Basketball League in a national tournament. Resolution 98-71 2) Approve the purchase of playground equipment for Sugden Regional Park. Awarded to Dominica Recreation Products in the amount of $78,461 D. SUPPORT SERVICES 1) A Resolution approving the Satisfaction of Liens for certain residential accounts wherein the County has received payment and said liens are satisfied in full for the 1994 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Resolution 98-72 Page 5 March 17, 1998 2) Modification of a Grant Agreement extending the completion time for the installation of a NOAA Weather Transmitter from March 31, 1998 to September 30, 1998. 3) Rescind previous contract award and award Bid No. 97-2751 for waterproofing of Administration Building to Aerial Restoration Contractors. In the amount of $57,102 4) A Resolution approving the Satisfaction of Liens for certain residential accounts wherein the County has received payment and said liens are satisfied in full for the 1994 Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services Special Asses'~ments. Resolution 98-73 E. COUNT~ ADMINISTRATOR 1) Budget Amendment Report B.A. 98-173 F. BOARD OF COUNg"f COMMISSIONERS G. MISCELLANF_X)US CORRESPONDENCE 1) Satisfaction of Lien: NEED MOTION authorizing the Chairman to sign Satisfaction of Lien for Services of the Public Defender for Case Nos.: 96-9115-MMA, 96-10318-~4A, 96-9763- M/~A, 96-5427-MMA, 95-4734-MMA, 95-0342-CFA, 95-2929-~, 97- 1085-MMA, 95-6188-~A, 97-5150-I~MA, 97-2592-~, 97-12i6-C?A, 97-3568-MMA, 95-6822-MMA, 97-8284-MMA, 97-0643-M~QA, 96--9487- MMA, 97-5887-MMA, 97-0961-Ml~A, 97-5144-MPLA, 97-1146-CFA, 97- 2191-MMA, 97-6484-Ml~A, 97-4203-MMA, 97-7778-M/~&, 97-$036-~2.~., 96-10412-MMA, 97-1629-CFA, 97-7447-MMA, 97-8215-~4A, 97-3376- MMA, 97-3374-MMA, 97-3375-MMA, 97-9379-MMA, 97--7773-~A, 97- 8085-MMA, 97-8738-5~, 97-8881-MMA. 2) MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS TO FILE FOR RECORD WITH ACTION AS Ho DIRECTED. OT~IER CONSTITUTIONAL OFFICERS COUNTY A~"~ORNEY 1) Recommendation that the Board of County Conunissioners as ex-officio the governing body of the Collier County Wa~er-Sewer District approve the Stipulated Final Judgment relative to the easement acquisition on parcel nos. 702, 703, 902 and 903, Wayson Underground Utilities, Inc. in the lawsuit entitled Collier County v. William A. Kinsley, et. al., Case No. 96- 1315-CA-01-DRM. (North County Regional Water Treatment Plant Page 6 March 17, 1998 8-MGD Wellfield Expansion Project). J. AIRPORT AUTHORITY l?. ,A~J0Um~ .INQUIRIES CONCER1FiNG CHANGES TO ~ BOARD'S AGENDA SHOULD BE MADE TO THE~COUNT"fADI~LNiSTKATOR,S OFFIC~ AT 774-8383. Page 7 .7 AGENDA CHANGES MARCH 17, 1997 BOARD OF COUNTY (~OMMLg~IQNER~' MEETING ADD: ITEM 7(B) - HOWARD E. RICE, SECRETARY OF THE MARCO ISLAND LIONS CLUB REQUESTING A WAIVER OF PERMIT FEE. (STAFF'S REQUEST). ADD: ITEM 8(B)(2) - APPROVE THE ACQUISITION OF SERVICES NECE'3SARY FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION ASSOCIATED WITH THE DREDGING OF CLAM PASS PRIOR TO MAY 1, 1998. (STAFF'S REQUEST). CONTINUE ITEM 12(B)(I) TO 3/24 MEETING: PETITION PUD-97-18, REQUESTING A REZONE FROM RMF-6, RMF-12(6) AND RMF-12ST(6) TO PUD TO BE KNOWN AS THE DUNES PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF 111TM AVENUE NORTH (BLUEBILL AVENUE AND VANDERBILT DRIVE. (PETITIONER'S REQUEST). CONTINUE ITEM 16(A)(7) TO 3/24 MEETING: APPROVAL FOR RECORDING THE FINAL PLAT OF "GLEN EDEN, PHASE ONE". (STAFF'S REQUEST). March 17 - 98 Isles of Capri Advisory Committee request for replacement by Alfred Luckerbauer Tel/fax: 642 6852 SP£CUkL DISTRICTS (il0 ,Sec. 122.585. Separate cormectlons rot each sepnrnto unit. Each reslden[i~ un[t, whether occup~n; one or more 1o~ an~ whether i~ sh~[ oc~py ~y lot or parcel jo{ally ~[h ~y other residen[i~ u~t, sh~l the sewage disposal rees: end sep~nte connec. [ions will be req~ed For each or ~uch units. (Ord. No. 83-39. ~ ~4) Seca. 122.586-122.605. Reserved. Sec. 122-606. Created, boundaries. (n} Pursuan, t to F.S. ch. 125, the Isles of Capri Municipal Rescue and Fire Services Taxing Dis- trict is hereby created for the purpose of providing rescue and fire control services to the residents of thc area hereinaRer described: (b) All that land located in the county and spe- cific~ly described as: Sections 19, 20, 21, 22, 27, 28, 2g, 30, 31, 32, 33 nnd 34 of TowT~ship 51 South, and those portions of Set-lions 4, 5 n~d 6 of Tow~- ship 52 South, Range 26 East, ,~'hich He north of the M.ctrco River. (Ord. No. 78.49, § 1; Ord. No. 89-99. § Stale law reference-^uthori~7 to create municipal set. vice lax:ag or benel~t unit, F.S. ~ 12S.01(l}(qL Sec. 122.(;07. Go:verning body. The governing body of the district sh~l be, e× officio, the board of county commissioners. [Ord. No. 78-49, § 2) Stale In~ reference--Similar pr~visions, F.S..~ 125.(1H2). Scc. 122-608. Purpose. The district is furmed for the purpose of pro-. riding, equipping, operating, and maintaining n rescue and fire department w~thin the district; to buy, lease, sell, exchnnge or otherwise acquire, hold and dispose of equlpmenl: o~nd other personal or real property and to provide rm adequate water supply for f'tre prevention and protectio, pt~rpo.~e.~; to employ n~d dischnrF, c emplny-r'~ n,~l n~thori~e them [o enter upon private nnd p.hlic lu'~pcrLy re~onable times to inspect, combat n.d investi- gn~. possible and ncLu~ ~re hazards nnH ncc~r- rences; to prom:itgnte ~]es and regulations the prevention ~d control of fire and ~o protect persons sad property within ibc dis~ricl. (Ord. No. 78-49, ~ 3; Ord. No. 89.99, f 2) Sec. 122.609. Advisory committee. (a) For the pu~ose of c~in~ into e~ec~ ~ticle, the board of county com,ni~sioners shall appoint a committee of t}:,r~e to five electors re- siding within the district tc serve staggered terms or two years each, t.o hold rattlings aL such time~ ~d places ~ it sh~l determi-c for the p.rpose of advising the board regardlna Use nff~irs of district. ~} The nd~so~ committee ~ha]l annually pre- p~e n ~strict budget m~d estimate the rituals, tl~eir pu~ose ~d the od v~orern taxes .ecessn~ tn cnr~ out the provisions of thi~ article far the fol- lowing fisc~ ye~, as prescribed by F.S. ch. I29. ~c} ~pon adop[ion of the districL hs.lge[ by the board, it sh~ c~use the budget to he recorded in the bo~d ~nutes and shall ca.se I.o be levied on ~1 property ~thin the district ~ mill.ge cient to fund the budget, not exccedin~ one mill in ~y one year to be assessed nnd collected ns county t~es. (d) The treasurer of the board shall: {1} Issue all wnrrnnts for service~. mnteri~s ,~;~d other expenses incurred by the district and approved far pnymcn~ by the ffovcrninff body. (2} On or before the end of each fiscal year pre. pare an annual report of thc rcceipU; and e~endltures of the district to the governi.ff ~ard as req.ired by F.S. ~ 218.20 et seq. {Ord. No. 78.49, f 4} Crosq refe~nce-~nn~d~, commi~cinn~. ~mmiU~ nmi [hotleles, ~ 2.81~ et seq. ~ec. ~22-G10. ~ot~ndn~ The boundarie~ of Lids district, or Ih~ ln~d~ cluded in s~d d~strict, may he chnn~cd by a~ amendment to this article. (Ord. No. 78.49. ~ 5) CD122:87 '- f ,..'C.~LT£~' Er.I~D ?.E~'".,' .9'~ r-'t~,;E O '~ MEMORANDUM DATE: June 2'7. t997 TO: £ROM: ;elf Pile, ~ Cam_~u~der Oeptrtment of Emrr8en~:y Services T(eidi F. AJh~n, A.l~ist~t Coun~ AHom~ llle~ of C~pH Ad¥ilory B~ud RLS No. EMS9'705250! You e~la~aed t.q[t t~ Ides of Capri Mu:njc~plJ Relcue ~d FIK 9~'~e T~ing Dli~ct Ad~ ~o~d b ~ue~g citron u ~ ~ 3u~od~ ~d ~c~ou. Sp~lfically, w~t to ~ow ~ ~e m~ of ~e ~ or Capri M~clp~ Re~ ~d F~ S~l Di~ct m~ ~ ~d ~g d~ilio~, p~~t d~sio~ ~d o~ ~tnmg~t The Isle~ of Capri Mtmicipat Rea,:ue u~l Fire Service Tax/ns Di,ulct wu ctea,~ by ~ ~~ce No. TBS9. M ~~ ~y ~~ No. 89.99 p~nnt to S~t{ou 125.01. FIo~ 3~mtes. ~e Bo~ of ~m~ Co~m!~n~ ~ ~e ex-o~cio gov~g body of ~cL ~s~c ~ Secdon ~o of s~d o~.. ~e ~s~ ~y wn ~t~ by Sm~on ~o~ of ~cc No. ~9 o~ ~s~8 ~ Bo~ a~ ~ Co~ion~ rel~g ~c ~ oF ~e Dis~ct. ~dc~ ~~ lO ~c ~so~ com~ m~b~. ~?o~ al~oush ~c ~so~ boud p~~t d~u~, ~d ~y o~ m~~t d~o~, ~ m~e by the Bo~ of ~o~ssion~; ....... .-.- · By (:]~fli~l No, .93-72, u Line,did, the ]~ard of Cou~b/ ~n~~W ~imo~ to ~e~~~~r, ~d ame~t~ ~o m~ of ~e ~ of ~fi M~Otpal R~ ~d Fi~ Se~ce T~S D~et m ~e ~~y S~cu ~r~r. (SM ~~ c~ ~ December 20, l~.) ~e L~ef ef~e bl~ ofC~fl ~c~d R~ ~ployN of ~e ~ of Co~ ~s~ who Ptme feel ~ ~ e~l me ~f~u ~e ~ qu~. cc: Dsvld C. Wellel, Co~aty Atmraey 7 A iSLES OF CAPKI FIRE REoCUE November 11. 199'7 diane 71agg, Chiet Emergency Services Department RE: Isles of Capri Advisory Board Members Dear Diane: Please be aa¥iscd lhis letter is to recommend the Advisor? Board ol'tt:e Isles Capri Fire Depnrtment be disband and new Advisory Board members be elected. would like this matter to be presented to the County Administrator. 'the Advisory Board has not been co,nply!ng with the Sunshine Law in that there has no~ been proper notification to the community of the monthly Advisory. Board meetings at the fire department. We held a town i~all meeting, November 3, 1997, at the fire station where approximately 150 residents attended. At that meeting, several residents spoke out to the Advisory Board and mfor~ed them they did not know an :~,~sory Board existed nor that monthly meetings are held at the fire station. On November 6, 1997, the Advisory Board attempted to t~ave a meeting at the fire station and was canceled by the County Attorney for not complying with the Sunshi,c Law and giving the residents proper notification of the meeting. Recently, ti~e Advisory. Be. ara i,~s withheld public information i.e., thc minutes from previous Board meetings. This has created controversy because some of the resident: ~'~ :he community have been asking for the minutes, but they cannot be provided. To date, I have not yet received the fire department book of minutes from the Board. Lastly, the Advisory Board is not in compliance with Ordinance No. 93-72. The Chief of the Isies of Capri Municipal Rescue and Fire Service Taxing District is an employee of the Board of County Commissioners wixo acts as the !iaison and the facilitator betwee:} the advisory, committee and the Board of County Commissioners. They have taken matters into their own hands by conferring with County Commissioners. Thank you for your consideration in this regard. ~mglo l~O~rlguez, ~nlel Isles of Capri Fire Rescue iSLES OF .... EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT EMS/FIKE MEMORANDUM To: From: Re: Diane Fiagg. Chief Emergency Services Dcparlment Emilio Rodri~u~. Chief ,~],, Isles of Capri Fire Re~ff~ - November 25, 1997 Advisory Board Minutes On November 5, 1997, a resident stopped in the Islet o~' Capri Fire Department asking for a cop)' of six (6) months worth of Fire Advisory .Board minters. I then noticed that the book of minutes was not in the station. I asked Lt. Butler to contact Pat Pschia~oda, who is appointed by the Advisory Board and is compensated by the county to take the minu~es, and ask her if she had them. She told Lt. Butler it would take a while to get the minutes ta the station becan~ [he3- wer~ spread out at her house. An hour later, Lt. Butler called Pat Psehigoda again and wa.~ informed by her daughter she was not there and she thought Pat went to Mr. Woosley's house. On ,he third call that night, her dauc..,ter answered the phone and Lt. Butler a.qked her to contact Pat. She said. "There's nc, way". Lt. Butler explained and said a resident wanted cople~ of the minu:es. Her daul~kter then said that they can get them from Pat or Woo.~ley if they wanted. A fourth cml was placed that evening by Lt. Butler at 7:20 p.m. and he Rot an answering rna:blue. T'nis information was documented by LL Butler. On November 17, 1997, the book of minutes along with one cassette :.:;'..: of minutes from October 2, 1997 was returned to Commander Page and m.v~i¢ at the fire ~ation. Six (6,x tapes of mint. res were not returned. Mr. Woosley {old Commander PaRe uno myself that he did not know where the remainder of the tapes were. On November I8, I997, Mr. Woosley received a letter from Chief .VlagR addressing the remainder of the tapes, stating that they needed to be returned back to the station. On November 21, 1997, during a special meeting at Isles of Capri, Mr. Woo.~ley returned four (4) of the tapes to Commander Page. The tapes were from 7/I0/97; 8/7/97; and 9/I1/97 was two tapes. I noticed, the following day, thc tape for the public meeting held ! 1/3/97 was not one of the tapes returned, along with the 11/14/97 and 11/21/97 tape~. On Monday, November 2A, 1997, l contacted L, etectJve Schott and informed him that I never received the tapes from ! 113197; 11/1.1/97 and ~ti/21/97 from Mr. Woosley. That afternoon, Detective Schott received from Mr. Woosley a complete set of tapes. These tapes, dating 7/10/97 to 11121197, reflect t~e first time we taped minutes to present. The tapes were then returned to the fire department by Detective Schott and I signed a Property Receipt for a totat of nine (9) tapes. "Personnel Separation Form" Resignation vohmtary good standing Discharged Reason for Voluntary Separation Lieutenant Please attach any wrilten or verbal counseling ~ reprimands ISLES OF CAPRI ADVISORY BOARD MEMBERS: FEBRUARY 5. 19O,q I am writing this letter to try. and clear up some misleading allegations that were recently ~w~;::.q about the Isles of'Capri Fire Department. It was said by former board member Skip \Vootsev that Volunteers in the past, have at times, demonstrated an inability to run the fire ,,rock properly, don air backpacks(known as S.C.B.A., self containing bre,~th;ng apparatus) and work other equipment. It was also said that our department has no State Ce~,ified Firefighters. This. in sho~, is nothing but a lie! The Isles of Capri Fire Department currently have twenty, t','o volunteers. Here is a list of the qualifications of' our volunteers: One paramedic, one in paramedic school, eight that ".:': EMT Certified. five that are Four hundred hour state certified firefighters, four that are in the four hundred hour acaciemv. ten that are Hay. Mat Operations Certified, ten that are E.V.O.C. Certified (Emergency Vehicle Operations Course), two that are fifty six hw:r structural :: e ,"t i :"5. e:2., and one ;hat is currently in EMT school. In my opinion, the above does not sound like an untrained, unqualified Fire Department. ,ks far as Chief Rodriguez goes, he has always demanded the best from his volunteers. We train a minimum of four hours every thursday night, and must pull at least a tweleve hour shift once a cmo. nth. He has always supported the volunteers in getting all the training, and certifications can get to help our Future. Th'e morale at our department has been high, and we ,Mil conti.-.ue to be a ~eam for better or worse. The allegations that have been said about us, are a complete injustice to our department and to our volunteers. It is our responsibility to provide the residents oflsles of Capri the best Emergency Service available, not to be looking over our shoulders, worrying ab-",ut someone else -"' tc,~xllq.., tls OVer. '(here ts no reason for us to be punished, we have done no:fling wrong. ;Ve just want :o do our job. please let us! Thank yo3/, E...Ftj:~y. d. Fire Fighter Vice President of Volunteers cc: Diane Flag. Chief of Emergency Services of Collier County Robert Fernandez, County Manager Collier County Board of Di:ectors ISLES OF CAI:'::-I FIRE AND RESCUE DISTR!CT .,anuary 21, 1998 Tot. Jennifer Edwards, Director Human Resources From: Emilio Rodriguez, Chief Isles of Capri Fire Department Ref: Job Harassment Dear Ms. Edwards, This is in reference to the Fire Advisory Board on the Isles of Capri and me harassment i have been subjected to for the last eight m°nths. The function of this adv2sory board is strictly to ~tdvise on budgetary matters. They began to involve themselves in the operational issues of the department eigi:t months ago and in cum started to harass me, my staff and volunteer~. Mr. Ed Huegel seems to be the leader in the harassment, but the Advisory Board has been standing behind his decisions. I have repeatedly answered ail his allegations and defamatory remarks with facts and yet he continues to call me deman~img information that has no importance to his function as a Board Member. He repeatedly brings these same issues up at every board meeting...we never seem to be able to get on to any "new" or "relevant" business. I am always at the center of these negative comments, Not only has Mr. Huegel and the Board defamed my character on ~.ne isles of Capri, ~,ut they have communicated these nonfactual issues to the other Fire Departments in the Collier County. area. I can tolerate this NO He has scheduled several of these Board Meetings on "traimng" nights, therefore I am unable to attend due to my onerational obligations. Mr. Hueget does not seem to understand that the purpose of the Fire Departmer~* is to protect the lives and property of the residents of Isles of CaPri and not listen to his continuing hostile diatribe. On ,lannary 8, 1998 we had the monthly Advisory Boar~ me~ing. I was ~znable to attend due to fire training. The Chief's releort was complete,:., and read by Commander Page, bat Mr. Huegd said that he want'ed it to be r~d by Cb. ief Rodriguez. The board allowed him to schedule a "special" meeting for the purpose of JUST r/:ading the Chief's report, It was scheduled, for,~anuary 20, 1993, ney day off.. i was unable to att:nd this meeting due to a personal family emergency., but Lt. Butler, n~y sec¢c.:t in command, was available to read. the report. This was unacceptable to Mr. ltuegel. I stopped by the fire sea,ion at abo~tt £:0~,nm, after she emerg-.ncy had been reso,ved. I was in my personal vehicle and in civilian clothes :o check with L~. Butler on the status of the departmev, t. This was a~parentiy observed by Mr. ltuegei and first thing this morning he called Lee Ochs to "tell on" me. [ am tired of these childish games that have been going on for eight months Il OW'o ,My voiunteers are being harassed by ca',is at home, asking q,e~:!.~,n.g reference tn this department and then they hang up. This Advisory Board is undergoing two investigations involving x';a:,~tisn of the SL"NSHINE LAWS by. the State Attorney, as welt as the Collier County 5;,erifF~ O.,,~ce. There i~ also a Sex,al Harassment allegatior, being i~v~?.~'... department r.--ference Chairman of the Boarcl Ed tluzzet and one o.~ my '.'ehtn.*eerx. Attached you will find correspondence from myself tc. Diane B. ~"qatg, Chief of Emerge,:~-T Set'vices, as well as res!den,s from the Isles of Capri to, .i:e County. Attorney asking that the board be dissolved due to el.ese continuir, g hostile isa,es. I would asa that this matter be resolved in an expedie:rt manner. T~is has now affected not only my morale, but the morale of my staff and vahmteers. The department can longer b..e expected to operate under the demeaning conditions that Mr. Huegel and Board have created. Sincerely, Emilio Rodrigu~': Chief Isles of Capri Fire Department cc:Diane B. Flagg, Chief Emergency Services Department ? A ISLES OF CAPRI FIRE AND RESCUE DISTRICT Febru~.ryll, 1998 To: Diane B. FlaRE. Chief Collier County Emergency Services From: Emilio RodrJgue~, Chief Isles of Capri Fire Department Ret: Job Harassment letter dated 1/21/98 Dear Chief Fi·gE, I sent the ab·Ye mentioned letter to Jennifer Edwards at Human Resources on 1/21/98. I waited until 1/27/98 to follo'v up with Ms. Edwards and found her meeting with Leo ·chi. It w,q brought to my attention by him that my letter alleging Job harassment ~'as to be put on hold until he could schedule n meeting with me. Th,t some day Jennifer Edwards Informed me that this same letter was put on hold until Leo ·chi could meet with me. Leo ache scheduled · meeting with me on 1/29/98 at 4:00 pm in his office. This meeting was canceled and was rexcheduled for 2/'2/98 at 4:00 pm. This meeting was also canceled Ia be reschedui~d for 2/5/98 it 6:oo pm. At this time we met at Isles of Capri Fire Station and we spoke about current cvent~ happening Jn the fire department. He informed me not to sF,~ak to the med~a and to direct any question they might hove to Jorge AguiJera. PI·. lie also told me not to answer any questio~.q at the ~dvJsory Meeting and to have all queJtions dirtxted to him. Leo then asked me to hold offon pursuing my letter of job harassment until the l~trd of County Commissioners meeting on/./17/98. I asked him why and he did not Rive me un answer, l then informed him I wanted Jla·an ResourceJ to immediately begin the investigation and not to delay any further. He told me he would inform Ms. Edwards to begin the very. next day. i called Ma. Edwards at Human Resources at 3:.30 pm on 2/6/98 and left n message for her to call me. This call was not real, riced. I coiled again on 2/10/99 at 10:00 am and left a voice mail for her to cull me at the fire station. I called again at 4:40 pm the same day and left anther message neither of the~e calls were returned. ! called again on 2/11/98 and spoke with Jennifer about the letter. She stated that we needed to get Diane FinER, ~ ·chi, and myself for · table meeting on this matter some time next w~-~k. Jennifer that this was no~ a harassment, but a mannfement issue. I asked her how she could say this when she hud not investigated the allegations. I then asked her if this was her way of I~tponing this isst'~e until after (he 2/17/9g Commission me, ting. i ·Isa Informed her thou I was seeking the sd,'ice of an attorney. At this time I om asking for your assistance In this matter. I feel that the~e delays are politically motivated and that ! am not being treated fairly by the County Admintstrttim% Isles of Capri Fire Deportment cc: ~ Och~ Administrator Support Services Robert gernonde~ County Administrntor ME MORANDUM TO. F-OM: DATE: REF: Leo Cchs. Admir~istrato; Support Services Diane B. Flagg. Chief Emergency Services Department February ~ 3, 1998 Work.~lace Harassment by the Isles of Capri Advi$or'y Board The continued frus!ra~on experienced by Chief Rodr~quez is ref',ecled m his most recent correspondence regarding job harassment. As we have discussed. have personally witnessed, on several occasions, the public beta/ion cf "'~' Rcdriquez by the Isles of Capri Advisory Board It would be my recommendation to immediately address the u¢~lensble sra.;alien Ch;el Rodriquez ar.'d his staff are in and to see~ dissolutio2 of the isles o: Capr: Advisory Board Thank you for you,' consideration altachments MARCO ISLAND LIONS CLUB P.O. BOX 173 MARCO ISLAND, FLORIDA 33969 ~arch 10, 1998 MAR 1 i 1998 COLLIER COUNTY CC~ID~.IS.IERS ~oard of Count:~ Co~issioner~ Dear Sirs The ~arco Icland Lions Club will be holding our annual pancake breakfast April h , 1998. The funds are used by our Lions club to help local people who are in need of glasses or have other eye problems. We are a completely not for profit organization and work at a local level helping people. We will be holding the breakfast April 4, 1998 at the Bavari~ Inn, located at 960 Winterberry Drive. We will be using our ~obile cook trailor. Collier county has a 75.00 dollar permit fee for this type of outdoor function. The ~:arco Island Lions Club wculd like for you to 'Nave this fee as we are a community service organization. Thanks for your consideration. Very sincerely yours, ,! Howard ~. 'Rice Secretary Howard E. Rice 1283 Treasure Ct. ~arco Is. FL. 3~1~5 Tel~phone 9~13892903 RESOLUTION 98- 74 A RESOLUTION BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2.7.3.4 OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE AFFECTING ORDINANCE 92-4 ALSO KNOWN AS GOLDEN GATE HEALTH PARK PUD, REQUIRING THE SUBMITTAL OF A PUD AMENDMENT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Golden Gate Health Park PUD, Ordinance 92-4 adopted on October 27 , 1992, is subject to the provisions of Section 2.7.3.4., of the Land Development Code (LDC), Tim~ Limits for Approved PUD Master Plans; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has reviewed the PUD and has determined that the current PUD Zoning is inconsistent with certain provisions of the Growth Management Plan (GMP) and the Land Development Code; and NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of Zoning Appeals of Collier County, Florida that: The above recitals are adopted herein by reference as if fully set forth herein. This Resolution shall constitute evidence of compliance with the review requirements of Section 2.7.3.4 of the LDC. Pursuant to said section of the LDC, the property owner or agent shall submit an amended PUD to the Planning Services Director prior to October 8, 1998 in order to cause said PUD to become consistent with the Collier County LDC. This Resclution shall become effective immediately upon its approval. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Resolution be recorded in the minutes of this Board and in the records of the Petition for which the extension is granted. vote. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority Done this BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORTDA ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BRO~K, Clerk Approved as to Form and Legal Sufficiency: ~arjo~ie ~. Student Assistant County Attorney f/ton/Golden Gate Health Park PUD/Sunset $ Jg~:~l~ure Permit No. PERMIT FOR CARNIVAL EXHIBITION 98-4 STATE OF FLORIDA : COUNTY OF COLLIER: WHEREAS, Golden Gate Area Chamber of Commerce, has made application to the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, for a permit to conduct the Golden Gate Frontier Days Festival; and WHEREAS, Golden Gate Area Chamber of Commerce, has presented to the Board sufficient evidence that all criteria for the issuance of a permit to conduct a carnival or exhibition as set forth in Ci~:~pter i0, Article II, Amusements and Entertainments, of the Collier County Code have been satisfied and that such carnival or exhibition will be conducted according to lawful requirements and conditions; and WHEREAS, said Golden Gate Chamber of Commerce, l]as requested a waiver of the Carnival Fee; and NOW, THEREFORE, THIS PERMIT IS HEREBY GRANTED TO Golden Gate Area Chamber of Commerce to conduct a carnival or exhibiticn on February 27th through March 1, 1998, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the petitioner's application and all related documents, attached hereto and incorporated herein for the following described property: (See attached Exhibit "A") WITNESS my hand as Chairman of said Boar(] and Seal of said attested by the Clerk of Courts in and for said County this day of / ./.,'¢~'.' , 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COHMISSIONERS: COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA: BARSaRA Bi 7B~ERR¥; Cha'irm~n ~ Approved as to Form-'end Legal Sufficiency:. Marjo~ie M. Student Assistant County Attorney f/C-9~~4 ~8~2 Tract 115, Golden Gale City, Unit 4. according Io Ihc plat Ihcrcofrccordcd in Plat Book 5, Page 109, of thc Public Records o1' Collicr Counly. FIorid;~. Exhibit "A" 8 ^ 2 (V!) Ac = pact-eLall-.,oeliliens fer-Re~.~ifl~n-A~ivNy-Gemecsqhe-appl~n~!! tro~s w~hin the Activity ~e~~~n ~-iteria su~s buf~ri~~rchk~a! ~nt~s 3nd h~he ~~rdinmli~~ff~t~ve~nLo~ffi~il~¢rou~~~ee; project ;~ VCoL ,,,;m;, ~, Acl~ky Centar~ the a-';~ .... ;~, ,k~,~ ~ · . . 9 ~ .... shal! be consider~ t~l~~ivi~enter. The 75% l~~v~~¢&~~~r~e of [~iv~nters 3re spo~F~lly d~t~il~Honin~n~ro~ri~w~r~i~ standard--for-intensity of-ur, es-wNhin-eac, h~ivity-Genter-ic-4hat-lhe-fulgarcay oL-6ommercial .u~ee-m~y~N~wed,--N ~ prefecred-lhaLalkne~merc,,ial-zening-within¥~c4iviJy_C, emers_~l:~a~ be ............ ned ..... Deuelepmen~ Vii!) J ' · · .. · r'~u~~ses-sh~ll--I~e-allewed-w~ h~n.-lb, e4nte rcha,qg e-A~vkLy_C.,enter s idenlkqed-t.~-Now; ----,a=-. -----lhe--r, eulhwem-,a nd s o u thee r:,t--q uad r-an tr:,-o ¢4mmokalee- R cad-,-3 ncLlnt a r st at ~:,,_7_8 lmec. c~..enge Ac!ivity Comet b. all quadr~mermate 75 4nlec¢,hang. e-Amivi~y-Gemen 8ac=,ed-on the-up,~.ue-loc:,alion_andJur-~ionoMnterc, hange_Ac4ivity __¢_,enter~. some4ndu$lrial4ar~ uses-that-serve~egienaL mar ke~nd-~e~e-~pe~fi(;.benefi~,vhe~te~., in-the.4n~.e, rc4~ nge Ar:4ivily-Genl~llowedmorovi~led-each-~,_4-~uee4s_reviewed_and4o~m.~d to be oompmible will:l-e,'~ic~-sc~~.~ee~. 4m;luetr~aPuses she!! be !imil~u4.-~.; wan=~u~cf ..... 2nddirC~ribulie~. 2, Interchange_Activity Center SubdistrLc_t Interchange Activity Centers ha_v_c_been deSigL0ated on .the F_uture LaQ¢_Use M_c___p..al _e_c_c_h__o_f Lhe three Interstate 75 'n_L0.~rchang¢.~ and._Loc!ude numbers 4._9 and 10. The boun¢_a_d~s_o_f these Interchange Activity Centers have been specifically defined on the ma_p_s_located aLl._b._~ end of this Section as part of the Future La_n_d. Use Map Series. Any changes t.Q the boundaries of these Inte~r.g._hange Activity Ce.0t__.e. rs shall re~e_E(;Imcp_t.!¢_/he Future Land Use Map Series_, Interchange Activity Centers ~ and #10 allow for a mixture of land uses - which m_ay include 100% or any combination thereof, of each of the following uses: the full array of commercial uses. residential and non-residential uses. institutional uses. hotel/motel uses at a density consistent with the Land Development Code. and Business Parks; and industrial uses a:, identified below in the southwest and southeast auadrants of Interchange Activity Center #4, No industrial uses shall be allowed in Interchange Activity Center #10. The actual mix of uses shall be determined during the rezoning process based On consideration of the ~¢me factors listed under the Mixed Use Activity Center Subdistricl, Interchange Aclivity Center # 9 shall be subject to the reauirement of the develn¢ment of an Interchange Master Plan flMP). The IMP is intended Io create an enj:Lance¢ "gaLe_~ay" tq Naples. The IMP groce~s shall be initiate~LDy the _proper.dy ownerseQ~Q.r_th_e~ 8 A 2 re_oresentatives by meeting with the County planning staff within 60 days of the adoption this Growth Management Plan amendment and a findina of compliance from the Department of Community Affairs. The purpose of the meeting will he to establish a mutually acceptabh: vision statement for Activity Center # 9. The Interchange Master Plan shall be adopted by Resolution by the Board of County Commissioners. All rezones thereafter shall meet thc intent of the vision statement. Subseauent to the development of the vision statement, new pro!ecl,s wilhin Activity Center t! 9are encouraged to have a unified plan of development in the form of a Planned U~it Develo_oment. The mixture of uses allowed in Interchange Activitv Center # 9 shall include the full array of commercial uses: residential and non-residential rises: institutional uses; Business Park: hotel/motel uses at a density consistent with the Land Development Code: industrial uses in the northeast, southwest and southeast auadrant~. The mix ned intensity pt land uses shall meet the intent of the vision statement and be defined during th~: rez(;;)ning process. The entire Interchange Activity Center is eligible for up tO 100% of the .entire acreage to be developed for any. of the uses r_.eferenced above, except the maxim, pm amount of co~nmercial acreage shall not exceed 55% of the total acreage (632.5 ac,) of Interchang~ Activity Center # 9. The factors to consider during review of a rezone petition shall bE compliance with the vision statement and tho.sc included, for the_Mixed Use Activity Center.. For residential developmenLif a [3rq)ject is within the boundaries of an Inter(;ha_nge Activily Center which is not within the Urba. n._l~_esidentia£Eringe Subdistrict and not within the Estates Designation. UD to 16 residential units Der gross acre may be permitted This density may be distributed throughout the Droje_ct. including any portion located out$iC.L~ of the_b..D, undarv of the Based on the unique location and function of Interchange Activity Centers, some Industrial land uses that serve regional markets and derive specific benefit when located in the Interchange Activity Centers shall be allowed, provided each such use is reviewed and found to be compatible with existing and approved land uses. Industrial uses shall be limited to: manufacturing, warehousing, storage, and distribution. The following conditions shall be required to ensure compatibility of Indt~strial land uses with other commercial, residential and/or institutional land uses in the Interchange Activity Centers: to maintain the appearance of these Interchange Activity Centers as gateways to the community; and to mitigate any adverse impacts caused by noise, glare or fumes to the adjacent property owners. The Planned Unit Deve!o[:)ment and/or rez~. shall contain specific language regarding the oermitled Industrial land uses. compatibility reauirements, and development standards consistenl with the folIQ;vjnq conditions. Site specific development details will be reviewed during the Site Development Plan review process, Landscaping, buffering and/or berming shall be installed along the Interstate; - Fencing shall be wooden or masonry; and · ----Ea~,-p. ~rojcct ch3!! adhere to !he Co!!ier County Siun Code~ and - Wholesale and storage uses shall not be permitted immediately adjacent to the right-of-way of the Interstate; and ~~nan~ No. 9! !03 mc adoptc~ on November 6, IOA RESOI,UTION NO. 98-75 A RESOI,UTION APPOINTING MEMBERS TO 'File U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AI.TERNATIVE DEVEI,OPMENT GROUP WtlEREAS, Ihe U.S. Army Corps of l:.ngineers is cnrrently preparing an Environmental hnpact Statement (EISI to rcporl lo Federal officials on the polcntial environmental impacts are anticipated to result from permitted development in Southwest Florida; and WItEREAS, thc U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) has recommended that botl~ Collier County ard Lee County assist thc ACOE in their preparation of Ibc EIS by appointing members consisting of interested citizens, organizations, and agencies to an alternative development group hosted by the ACOE to evaluate potential affects of development and provide alternative development plans Ihat reflect the range of viewpoints in the community; NOW, TIIEREFORF.. BE rf RESOLVED BY TIlE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ('OI.I.IF.R ('()IJNTY, FI.ORIDA, thai the following re.tubers arc hereby appointed Io serve Collier ('ounly Dcvelopm :hi Group: thc Army ('orps of I!nginccrs' Alternative Edward Gri ~th Pamela Pettit Earl Kegg Mark Strain Timothy Durham Jon Slaiger Whit Ward Tom Conrccodc David Guggcnheim Kim Boyd Rick Barber This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote. DATED: March 17, 1998 ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY. Chairman Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: David C. Weigel ~9 County Attorney DCW,'kn CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE AND ESCROW AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS THIS CONSTRUCTION, MAlrNTENANCE AND ESCROW AGREEMENT FOR SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENTS is entered into this 13th day of February , 1998 by MARKER LAKE VILLAS, INC., a Florida corporation (hereinafter "Developer"), the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA (hereinafter the "Board") and SOUTtlTRUST BANK, N.A., a national banking association (hereinafter "Lender")· A. Developer has, simultaneously with the delivery &this Agreement, applied for approval by the Board ora certain plat ora subdivision to be known as Marker Lake Villa.% Inc. B. The subdivision will include certain improvements which are required by Colher County ordinances, as set forth in a site construction cost estimate ("Estimate") prepared by Blair A. Foley, P.E. of Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc., a copy ofwhich is attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "1". For purposed ofthis Agreement, the "Required Improvements" are limited to those described in the Estimate. C. Sections 3.2.6.5.6 and 3.2.9.1 ofthe Collier County Subdivision Code Division of the Land Development Code requires the Developer to provide appropriate guarantees for the construction and maintenan,'e~ " ,.' -- Required Improvements D. Lender has entered into a construction loan with Developer dated November 6, 1997 (the "Construction Loan") to fund the cost of the Required Improvements. E. Developer and the Board have acknowledged that the amount Developer is required to guarantee pursuant to this Agreement is $5 i 7,000.00, and this amount represents 110% ofthe Developer's engineer's estimate of the construction costs for the Required Improvements. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the foregoing premises and the ~nutual covenants hereinafter .~et forth, Developer, the Board and the Lender do hereby covenant arid agree as follows: I. Developer will cause the water, sewer, roads, drainage and like facilities, such facilities constituting the Required Improvements, to be constructed pursuant to specifications that have been approved by the Development Services Director within 24 months from the date &approval of the subdivision plat referred to hereinabove. 2. Developer hereby authorized Lender to hold $517,000.00 from the Construction Loan, in escrow, pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 3. Lender agrees to hold in escrow $517,000.00 from the Construction Loan, to be disbursed only pursuant to this Agreement. I.ender acknowledges this amount shall not constitute a draw against the Construction Loan fund, but that only such funds as are actually disbursed, whether pursuant to this Agreement or the Construction Loan documents, shall accrue interest. Construction. Maintenance, and Escrow Agreement for Subdivision Improvements - Page I Marker I.ake Villas, Inc. 16^ I 4. The escrowed funds shall be released to the Developer only upon written approval of the Development Services Director who shall approve the release ofthe funds on deposit not more than once a month to the Developer, in amounts due for work done to date based on the percentage completion of the work multiplied by the respective work costs less ten percent (10%); and further, that upon completion of the work, the Development Services Director shall approve the release of any remainder of escrowed funds except to the extent of $47,000.00 which shall remain in escrow as a Developer guaranty of maintenance ofthe Required Improvements for a minimum period of one (1) year pursuant to Paragraph I0 of this Agreement. However, in the event that Developer shall fail to comply with the requirements of this Agreement, then the Lender agrees to pay the Board immediately upon demand the balance of the funds held in escrow by the Lender, as ofthe date of the demand, provided that upon payment of such balance to the Board, the Board will have executed and delivered to the Lender in exchange for such funds a statement signed by the Development Services Director to the effect that: (A) Developer, for more than sixty (60) days after written notification of such fail,.:,re, as hailed to comply with the requirements of this Agreement; (B) the Board, or its authorized agent, will complete the work called for under terms ofthe above-mentioned contract or will complete such portion ofsuch work as the Board, in its sole discretion, shall deem necessary in the public interest to the extent of the funds then held in escrow. (C) the escrow funds drawn down by the Board shall be used for construction of the Required Improvements, engineering, legal m~d contingent costs and expenses, and to off'set any damagr:s, either direct or consequential, which the Board may sustain on account of the failure of the Developer to carry out and execute the above-mentioned development work; and (D) the Board will promptly repay to the Lender any portion of the fimds drawn down and not expended in completion of the said development work. 5. Written notice to the Lender-by the Board specifying what amounts are to be paid to the Developer shall constitute authorization by the Board to the Lender for release of the specified funds to the Developer. Payment by the Lender to the Developer or the Board of the amounts specified in a Letter of authorization by the Board to the Lender shall constitute a release by the Board and Developer of the Lender for the funds disbursed in accordance with the letter of authorization for the Board. 6. The Required Improvements shall not be considered complete until a statement ofsubstantial completion by the Developer's engineer along with the final project records have been furnished to be reviewed and approved by the development Services Director for compliance with the Cmi:,er County Subdivision Regulations and the Development Services Director gives prelimi,ary approval of the Required Improvements. 7. The Development Services Director shall, within sixty (60) days of receipt of the statement of substantial completion; either: a) notify the Developer in writing of the preliminary approval of the improvements; or b) notify the Developer in writing of the refusal to approve the improvements, therewith specifying those conditions which the Developer must fulfill in order to obtain preliminary approval from the Development Services Director ofthe Required Improvements. However, in no event shall the Construction, Maintenance, and Escrow Agrccment for Subdivision Improvements - Page 2 Marker Lake Villas, Inc. 16^ Development Services Director refuse preliminary approval of the improvements if they are in fact constructed and submitted for approval in accordance with the requirements of the Agreement. 8. Should the funds held in escrow be insufficient to complete the Required Improvements, the Board, after duly considering the public interest, may at its option complete the Required Improvements and resort to any and all legal remedies against the Developer. 9. Nothing in this Agreement shall make the Lender liable for any funds other than those placed on deposit by the Developer in accordance with the foregoing provisions; provided, that the Lender does not release any monies to the Developer or to any other person except as stated in this Agreement. I0. The Developer shall maintain ali Required Improvements for one (1) year after preliminary approval by the Development Services Director. After the one (1) year maintenance period by the Developer and upon submission ora written request for inspection, the Development Serve:es Director shall inspect the Required Improvements and, if found to be still in compliance with the Code, as reflected by final approval by the Board, the Lender's responsibility to the Board under this Agreement is terminated. Lender may thereafter release all funds remaining in escrow to Developer. The Developer's responsibility for maintenance of the required Improvements shall continue unless or until the Board accepts maintenance responsibility for and by the Board. 11. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained herein are and shall be binding upon the Board, Developer and Lender, and the respective successors and assigns of the Board, Developer and Lender. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board, the Developer and the Lender have caused this Agreement to be executed bytheir duly authorized representatives this 13Ih day of February, 1998. SIGNED, SEALED AND DELIVERED IN THE PRESENCE OF: Print or Type Name Print or Type Name MARKER LAKE VILLAS, INC. a Florid.a Corporati~k~ ~ Eugene~%ushman President Print or Type Name Print or Type Name SOUTHTRUST BANK, N.A. .. , By: ' ')5;f'_,,,~z-r'~, '::". ".//"?'? "'"?...-'~- Frank N. W6odward, Vice President Construction, Maintenance, and Escrow Agrccmcnt for Subdivision Improvements - Page 3 Marker Lake Villa.,;. Inc. Attest as to ChaPman's signature Depu~ Clerk Approved as to form and legal ~ufficiency: Print Name Below Collier County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 6A 1 Construction, Maintenance, and Escrow Agreement for Subdivision Improvements - Page 5 Marker Lake Villas, Inc. Il Il -- Il ................... I INIIII ....... ! .......... EXHIBIT "~' ENGINEER'S COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY I. Potable Water System II Sanitary Sewer System III Drainage IV Paving, Concrete, Miscellaneous SubTotal Total (rounded to nearest $1,000) 10% of Total (~ 110% Letter of Credit amount = $ 47,683.00 $130,731.25 $ 61,860.00 $229.429.55 $469,703.80 $470,000.00 $ 47.000.00 $517,000.00 Construction, Maintenance, and Escrow Agreement for Subdivision lmprovernenls - Page 4 Marker Lake Villas. Inc. RES()I,UTION NO. 98- ?o A RESOI.UTION OF TIlE BOARI)OF ('¢)UNTY COMMISSIONERS, ('OI.i.IER COUNTY, FI.ORIDA AUTliORIZIN(; Tile I)EFERRAI. OF I.IBRARY SYSTEM IMPA('T FEES. PARKS AND RE('REATI()NAI. FACII.ITIES IMPA('T FEES. ROAD IMI)A('T EEES. WATER IMPA('T FEES, SEWER IMPA('T I.'EES. EMERGENCY MEDI('AI, SERVICES IMPA("F FEES, AND EDUCATIONAl. FACIIATIES SYSTEM IMPACT FEES FOIl SAXON MANOR ISI,I';S A 124 UNIT AFFORDABI.E RENTAl° IIOUSIN(; PROJECT, AND SUBORDINATION OF I.IEN. WIIEREAS. Collier County has recognized and attempted to address ~l~e lack uf adcqttatc and affordable housing for modcratc, Iow, and very Iow income houschohls in Collier County and thc need for crcalive and innovative programs to assisl in thc provision of such ~ousing by including several provisions in thc Collier ('ounly Growth M;llmgcmcnl Pkm. inclt~dmg: objective 1.4, policy 1.4.1, objective 1.5, policy 1.5.2, policy 1.5.3. policy 1.5.4. policy 1.5.5. policy 1.5.6: objecl 1.6, policy 1.6.3; ol~icctix'c 2.1, policy 2.1.1. policy 2.1.2. policy 2.1.3. policy 2.1.5, and policy 2.1.6 of thc I loasing Element; and WIIEREAS, Saxon Manor Isles Apaflmcnts II l, imiled Partnership will tmdcrlakc Iht development of Saxon Manor Isles Apartments. a one hundmtl and twcnty-lbur [124} trait affordable rental housing communily on a site located in Collier County, Florida. of which Saxon Manor Isles Apaflmcnls Il l,imilcd Pa~ncrship is owner; alltl WHEREAS. on JanuaD, 8, 1998, an application was filed with Iht Cotmly Administrator Ibr thc dclkmal of (.'oilier County impact fees for thc Saxon Manor Isles Apartment consistcm with thc requirements oflhc Cotmty impact Ike ordinances: and WttEREAS, in accordance with Section 3.4 of thc I,ibrary System Impact Fcc Ordinance, Ordinance No. 88-97, its amcntlcd; Section 4.05 of thc Parks and Recreational Facilities hnpact Fee Ordinance, Ordinance No. 88-96. as amended; Section 3.04 of Iht Road Impact Fcc Ordinance, Ordinance No. 92-22, as amended: (.'oilier County Ortlinmlcc No. as amended, the Collier Counly Water System hnpacl Fcc Ordinance: Collier Cotmtv Ordinance No. 9{}-87, as amended, the Collier County Scxxcr System Impact Fcc Ordinance; Section 3.1}5 of the Emergency Medical Services System hnpact Fcc Ordinance. Ortlil;iulcc No. 91-'~1. amended; and Scclion 3.05 of Iht Educalional Facililics Syslcni In;pacl Fcc Ortlin;mcc. Ordinance No, 92-33. as amended, atl applicant may obt;fin a deferral of one hundred percent (100%) of impact fees for a pc~od o~six (6) years by qualifying ~or said dcfemfi: and WHEREAS, Saxon Manor Islc~ Apa~mcnts has qualified for an impact Ibc tlel~'n'al based upon thc following representations made by Saxon Manor Isles /kpmlmcnts Il l.mmcd Pannership: A. Thc Dwelling Unit shall be Ihe pennancnl residence oflhe occupant/~cnam. B. Thc household renting Ibc Dwelling Unit must have a very Iow or Iow income lex'cl. at thc commencemenl oF the leasehold and duration thercofi vs Ihal Icnn is defined in thc Appendices to the respective Impact Fee Ordinances and Ihe momhly real must he within the affordable housing guidelines established in the Appen&.:cs to the respective Impact Fee Ordinances. C. The Dwelling Unit shall remain affordable for at least fifteen (15) years I?om thc date the certificate of occupancy was issued. I. The Board of County Commissioners hereby authorized thc defc~al by Collier Counzy of thc following impact fees in the amounts listed below For thc one hundred and txvcnty-fimr (124~ affordable housing units lo be developed by Saxon Manor Isles Apartmcms II I.imitcd Partnership as identified in Exhibit "A": ~ 124 Units a) Library System Impact Fees S 18(}.52 S 22.38.: 4,"; b) Road Impact Fees 952.00 118.¢)48.()() c) /).'irks & Recreation Impact Fccs Conlmtlrlity Parks 399.00 49,476.00 Regional Parks 179.00 22. J 96.111) ti) Emergency Sen'ices hnpac! Fees 2.¢}0 248.~}~ c) Sewer hnpact Fees 1,340.O0 I OWatcr hnpact Fccs 900,00 J I I.bO(),{l() g) School Impacl Fees 827.00 lO.2.~ TOTAl. AMOUNT IMPACT FEES DEFERRED S 592,660.48 2. A) in compliance with the provision of the Collier County impact Ibc ordinances, Saxon Manor Isles Apartments Il Limited Partnership has demonstrated to the Couqty that a subordination of the County's rights, interests and lien is necessary to oi~IaJn l~nancmg lbr thc 2 Saxon Manor Isles Apartments. an affordable housing prqjccl consislin~ of one hundred ami twenty four multi-family dwcllin~ units: and B) In compliance wilh Ihe provisions of thc impacl Fcc ordinances. ~l~c 0~ ncr will deliver the Counly substitute collnlcral in thc fom~ of cash and u cash equiv:Hcnl financial instmmem payable Io II~e County which Io~cthcr will yield Io 11~c C'Otll~ty Uic fidl of II~e deleted impact I~es. i.e.. tl~e sum o~ Five Ihmdrcd Ninely Two Thous,md Six llundrcd and Sixty Dollars and 48/100 (S502,66o.48) at Ibc expiration o1' linc porn'tod Ibc dcfe~al, AuBust 15, 2004, i.e.. a United Slates Treasury Zero Coupon [~oild which will malure al the end oflhe def¢n'al period. Augusl 15, 2004. ;ultl. upon m;~turily, would yield an amounl equal to Ihe ;mlotmt o1' the deleted Fees. ('otlnty covcll;lllls ;Igtl agrees Ibal il will nol negotiale Ihe bond unless and until the deleted impact Ikes become due and payable pursuanl lo Ihe lem~s of the Agrecmcnl for I Or)?;. Delbmfl of Collier ('otlHIv Impact Fees and Ihal all moneys received by negoliafion of the bond shall Iw applied the payment of said deleted impact fee obligation owing by Saxon klanor Isles Apartments II Limited Pannership. C) The County hereby covenanls and consenls and agrees Ihal its rigi~ls, intcresls and lien pursuanl to Ihe Agreement shall be subordinaled to the lien oflh¢ Mortgage and Security Agreement ("Mortgage") and other documents executed by Owner in consideration therewith from Saxon Manor Isles Apartments II Limited Pannersbip ~o Collier Housing Finance Aulhorily or olher prima~ lenders in thc principal amoun~ of up Io Six Million Four Hundred Thousand Dollars (S6,400,000), plus accrued interes~ and all advances authorized under the provisions of such mortgages. The ('oun~v will cxecme such subordination agreements as may be reasonably required by said mongak~ccs. 3. Defe~al of said impacl fees is subjecl Io and contingent upon execution and recordation oran Agreemcnl for Defe~al of Collier Counly Impact Fees which shall be entered inlo between the applicant and County. This Resolution adoptcd aClcr motion, second and majority vote fi~voring same. DATED: '~'J)ao..~L., j ~ j ,a ,9oP" ATTEST: Dwight E. Brock. Ci~'k BOARD OF COUNTY CO.X,'IMISSIONEP, S COLLIER COUN'FY. FLORIDA Attest as to Chaf~an's Signature onl]. Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: ! Heidi F. Ashlon Assistant County Attorney jd/f/saxonmanor/reso E HIBIT "A II SAXON NANOR ISLES APARTNENTS I! PROPERTY ~)~-~GRIP 110~ A PORTION OF THF' EAST 1/:Z OF l"H[ EAST 1/2 OF I'HE EAST 1/~Z OF THr NOR~qEAST I/4 OF SECT10N ~. T$',',?~'SHIO 50 SOUTI-t, RANG[ 2§ EAST. COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIOA. ~FINO uor~j' PARl~CuLARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLtOWS: COMMENCE AT 'tHE NOR'~IEASr CORNtW O~" SECDON 6. T0~I~SHIP SOg~t. RANGE 26 EAST. COLLIER COUNI~, F~ORiDA; ~t[NCE RUI~ S. 00'07'54= w.. ALONG ~{E EAST UNE OF ~tE NOR~EAST QUAR~R OF SAIO $[CDON 6, FOR A DISTANCE OF 59.41 FEET TO POINT ON ~E SOU~ERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY lINE CF RADIO ROAD 856); ~NCE CONllNU[ S. 00'07'~4' W.. ALONG THC EAST LINE 0F ~E NORIH[AST QUAR~R OF 5AID SEC~0N 6, FOR A DISTANCE OF ;365.79 FEET ~C ~E POINT OF ~~ OF ~E PARCEL. OF LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CON~NLJE S.00'07'54' W.. ALONG rl{[ EAST LINE OF ~[ NOR~AST OUAR~R OF SAID SEC~0N G. FOR A DISTANCE OF 1D~5.05 FEE1 TO ~t~t' EAST OUAR~R CORNER 0~ SAID S[C~ON 6; D4ENC~ RUN 5 89'2g'lb' W.. ALONG ~[ SOxJD~ LINE OF ~E NORI~CA~T OUAR~R GF SAI~ ~[C~0N 6. FOR A HALF OF 1HE EAS'r HALF OF ltJE EAST HAir gl' ~E NOR~EAST QUAR?ER OF SAIU SECTION 8; DtEhC~ RU~ N. 00'01'22' E., ALONG HA~ OF ~[ NORD~AST OUARER OF SA~D SECTION 6. FOR A DISTANCE OF 1254.00 FEET; ~ENC[ RUN S. ~'52'05" E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 6~.74 F~T; mENC[ RUN S. 00'07'D4' W. FOR A U~STARC[ OF 10. C0 r[~t; ~ENC[ RUM S. 8~'52'0~' E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 20~.O0 ~[T'. ~ENCt RUN R. 00'07'54' ~. FOR A D~SrANC[ OF ~S.O0 FE~T; ~ENC~ RUN ~. 89'S2'0~' [. FOR A DISTANCE 0F 35.35 FELT; IM~N{:I' RU~J N 00'0'7'~4' [.. r(;~ A DISTANCE O~ ~2 78 F~T: 1HENCE RUN N, ~9'52'06' ~'. rg~ A DIS1At~CE OF 23¢ ~ FELT, t~f'tJCE PtIN H "~'"'~" ,,t,: 2294542 OR: 2400 PG: 0040 CL~RX TO THE BOARD R~CORDBD in the OFFICIAL RI~CORDS of COLLIER COUNTY. FL RFC ?BE 37,50 [NTEROHIC~ 4TH FLOOR 03/19/98 at 10:IIAM Dk'IGHT ~. BROCL CLERK COPIES 9,00 AGREEMENT FOR 100% DEFERRAl, OF COLI,IER COUNTY IMPACT FEE~ ~ ~ This Agreement for thc Deferral of hnpact Fccs entered into this/7:r~ ,~t' .___'~?.4 c~_~__~_/ 1998, by and bctwccn thc Board of County Commissioners of Collier County. Florida. hereinafter referred to as "COUNTY" and Saxon Manor Isles Apartments II Limited Partnership hereinafter referred to as "OWNER". WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 88-97, as amended, thc Cc, llicr County Library System Inlpact Fcc Ordinance: ('oilier ('otmty Ordinance No. 88-%. as ;m~cndctt. Iht Collier County Parks and Recreational Facilities Impact Fcc Orclinancc: Collier County Ordinance No. 91-71, as amended, the Collier Cotmty Emergency Medical Ser¥iccs System Impact Fee Ordinance; Collier County Ordinance No. 92-22, as amended, ibc Collier County Road Impact Fee Ordinance; Collier County Ordinance No. 90-86, as amended, th~2 Collier County Water System Impact Fcc Ordinance; Collier county Ordimmcc No. 90-87. as amended. tire Collier county Sewer System h'npact Fcc Ordinance; and Collier ('otmly Ordinance No. 92-33, as amended, thc Collier County Educational Facilitics System Impact Fcc Ordinancc, its they nlay be further amended from time to time hereinafter collectively referred to as "Impact Fcc Ordinance", provide for deferrals of impact fccs for new owner-occupied dwelling units quail lying as affordable hot,sing; and WHEREAS, SunCoast Corp. of Delaware is the duly authori×cd general partner with Jack J. Bachmann as President; and WHEREAS, Jack J. Bachmann as President of SunCoast Corp. of Delaware. has applied for a deferral of impact fees as required by the Impact Fee Ordinance, a cop3' of said application is on file in the Housing and Urban h'nprovcmcnt Department; and WHEREAS, the County Administrator or his designee has reviewed Ibc OWNER's application and has fotmd that it complies with tire requirements l'or an aflbrdablc housing deferral; of impact fees as established in the Impact Fee Ordinance; and OR: 2400 PG: 0041 WHEREAS, thc impact fcc deferral shall be presented i,~ lieu ol'paymcnt o1' ;l~c rcquisitc impact fees subject Io satisfaction of all criteria in thc Impact Fcc Ordimmcc qtmlil?ing thc project as cligiblc for an impact fcc dcfcmfl; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY approved a dcl~xal of impact I~cs in ~l~c amount of I:ivc Hundred Ninety Two Thousand Six thmdred ired Sixty Dollars and 4~/100 (S5~2.6(~.4F,) Ibr six years from date of certificate of occupancy for Saxon Manor Isles Apartments embodied Resolution No. 98- 7o , at its regular meeting of ~arch 17, 1998 ami WttEREAS, thc impact Fcc Ordinance requires that thc OWNER c~acr into an Agreement with thc COUNTY. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the Foregoing recitals, thc parties covenant and agree as follows: 1. RECITALS INCORPORATED. Thc Ibregoing recitals are true and correct m~d shall be inco~orated by reference herein. 2. LEGAL DESCRIPTION. Thc legal description of thc dxvelling trails (thc "Dwelling Unit") is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and inco~oratcd by reference herein. 3. TERM. OWNER agrees that thc Dwelling Unit shall remain afibrdablc and shall bc offered for rent in accordance with Ibc standards set forth in thc appendix to thc Iml*act Fee Ordinance for a minimum of fifteen (15) years commencing fi'om thc date a certificate of occupancy is issued lbr thc Dwelling Unit. 4. REPRESENTATIONS AND WARRAN'YIES. OWNER rcprcscnt~ and xx'arrants following: a) Thc Dwelling Unit shall be thc permanent residence of thc occupant/rotator. b) The household renting Ihe Dwelling Unit must have a very low or Iow income level. the commencement of thc Icaschokl and duration thereof, as that term is tlcfincd in thc Appendices to thc respective Impact Fcc Ordinances and thc monthly rcm must be xvifl~in thc affordable housing guidelines established in the Appendices to thc rcspeclivc hupact Fee Ordinances. 2400 PG: 0042 c) Thc Dwelling Unil shall rcm;fin affordable Ibr at least Iiliccn II5) >'cars fi'om ~hc da~c ~hc ccnificatc of occupancy was issued. SUBSEQUENT RENTAL OR TRANSFER, IfOWNERrcntsthcl)wcllingUnitsul~jcclto lhe impact fee defe~al lo a subsequent renter, thc Dwelling Uni~ shall bc reined only households meeting Ibc crilcria scl lbnh in tl~c Impact Fcc Ordinance. 1'he impac~ I~cs deleted shall be immediately repaid lo thc COt INTY upon thc disctmlinttancc of usc of Ibc Dwelling Unit as affordable housing, or six years from thc date such impact tkcs arc dclkrrcd. whichever occurs first. OWNER agrees that cvcn though the impact Ikcs have been rcpaid to thc COUNTY, the OWNER will utilize thc Dwelling Unit for alTordable housing Ibr at least fifteen ~i5) years from the date the certificate of occupancy xvas issued Ibr thc Dwelling Unit. LIEN, The dcfcrrcd impact I~cs shall be a lien upon thc property which lien may foreclosed upon in the event of non-compliance with the requirements of this Agreement. The COUNTY acknowledges and agrees that: (a) In compliance with the provision of thc Collier County Impacl Fcc Ordinances. OWNER has demonstrated to thc COUNTY thai a subordination of thc County's rights, interests and lien is neccssa~ lo obtain financing for Saxon Manor Isles Apartments, an al'lbrdablc housing project consisting of one hundred Iwcnty-lbn (I 24) unils: it;id (b) In compliance with thc provisions of Iht Impact Fcc Ordinances, thc OWNER will deliver to thc COUNTY substitute collateral in Iht tbm~ of cash and it cils]l equivalent financial instrument payable to thc Counly which Iogclhcr will yield to the COUN I'Y thll amotmt of thc dclk~cd impact fees, i.e., thc sum oi' Five }ltmdrcd Ninclv Two fllousand Six Hundred Sixty Dollars and 48/100 ($592.661).48) at thc expiration of thc period of thc defc~al, August 15. 2004, i.e., a United States Treasury Zero (',mi)on Bontl which will mature at the end of thc ttcl~mfl period, August 15, 20114 and. upon maturity. would yield an amount equal to the amount of thc deleted Ikcs. COUNTY cOVCllallls and agrees that it will not negotiate thc bond unless and unlil Iht dcl~rrcd impact Ikcs become due and payable pursuant to this agreement and that all moneys received by OR: 2400 PG: 0043 negotiation of tim bond shall be applied to the payment of said deferred impact Ec obligation owing by Saxon Manor Isles Apartments Il Limited Parmcrship. (c) Thc County hereby covenants and consents and agrees that ils rights, inlcrcsts and lien pursuant to this agreement shall bc subordinated to thc lien of thc Morlgagc and Security Agreement ("Mortgage') and other documents executed by OWNF. R in consideration therewith from Saxon Manor Isles Apartments II Limited Parmcrship to ('oilier ('otmtv Housing Finance Authority, or other primary lenders in thc principal ;,mourn .,f t~p lo Six Million Four Hundred Thousand Dollars (S6,400.000). plus accrued intel:st and all advances authorized under thc provisions of such mortgages. Thc ('()t 'NT'f x~ ill execute such subordination agreements as may bc reasonably required bv s~,id mort,..z, agcs. 7. ANNUAL REPORI. Annually. thc OWNER of thc Dwelling t'nil shi, II provide to thc County Administrator an affidavit of compliance with thc al'tbrdahlc hot,sing qualil;.cmion criteria and standards set forth m thc Impact Fcc Ordinance. Said affidavit must be filed within thirty (30) days of tile annivcrsa~, date of thc issuance of thc ccrti ficalc of occupancy. If thc income of any unit renter which originally qualified as Iow intern:2 level as defined in tile respective Appendix to the Impact Fec Ordinance increases by more than lbrly percent (40%) above the low income level described in the appendix, then tl:c per unit deferred impact fee on the non-compliance unit shall become immediately duc and payable by OWNER or. in the alternative, the OWNER shall have ninety (90) days to comply with thc Affordable Housing guidelines set forth in the respective Appendices. 8. RELEASE OF LIEN. Upon satisfactory completion of the Agreement requirements, and upon payment of the deferred impact fees, the COUNTY shall, at the expense of thc COUNTY, record any necessary documentation evidencing such payment, including but not limited to, a release of lien. 9. BINDING EFFECT. This Agreement shall be bir~ding upon thc parties to this Agreement. their heirs, successors and assigns. In the case of sale or transfer by gift of the Dxxelling 4 OR: 2400 PG: 0044 Unit. 111¢ original OWNER si'tall remain liable for the impacl fees deferred ,ntil said impact tees are paid in fidl. IO. RECORDING. This Agreement shall he recorded by OWNER at thc expense of OWNER in the Official Records of Collier County, Florida xvithin sixty (60) days after execution of this Agreement by the Chai~an of thc Board of County Commissioners. 11. DEFAULT. OWNER shall be in default of this Agreement (1) where OWNER I~fils to rcm ti~e prope~y in accordance xvith the affordable housing standards a,d qualificalion criteria established in the Impact Fee Ordinance and flmrcafier fails to pay the impact tees due within thirty (30) days of notice of said non-compliance, or (2) where OWNER violates one of the affordable housing qualification criteria in thc Impact Fee Ordinance Ibr a period o1' fifteen (15) days after notice of violation. However, xvith respect to thc Annual Report. OWNER shall not be in default of this Agreement until a fifteen (15) day grace period I?om ~he due date of the rcpo~ has lapsed in lhe event the OWNER is in default. 12. REMEDIES. Should the OWNER of thc propc~y fail to comply with thc said qualification criteria at any time during thc fifteen (15) year period or should OWNER violate any provisions oC this Agreement, the impact fees delb~cd shall be paid in fi~ll by OWNER xvilhin thirty (30) days of said non-compliance. OWNER agrees that the impact lbcs dcl~rrcd shall constitute a lien on the property commencing on thc effective dale ol' this agreement and continuing tmiil paid. Except as set I~Hh in Section 6, such lien shall be superior and paramount to thc interest in thc Dxvclling L;nit of any owner. Icsscc. tenant, mortgages, or other person except Iht lien for County faxes antt shall be on partly with thc lien of any such County laxes. Should the OWNER be in dclhull of this Agreement alld thc dclhult is IiOI cured within lhi~y (30) days after xx'riucn nolicc to thc OWNER. Iht Board lllitv bring a civil action to enforce thc Agreement. In addition. Iht lien may be lbrcclosctl or othcmisc enforced by the COUNTY by action or suit in cquily as for Ibc Ibrcclosurc of a mortgage on real prope~y. This remedy is cumulative with any other right or remedy available ~o thc COUNIY. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the COUNIY shall realize upon thc collateral OR: 2400 PG: 0045 3 given to it by OWNER as described in Section 6c prior to cxcrcising any rights to recover against property. Thc Board shall be entitled to recover all fccs and costs, including attorney's fees, plus interest at thc statutory rate for judgments calculated on a calendar day basis until paid. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, thc parties have executed this Agreement For deferral of Impac[ Fccs on the date and year first above written. (2) Witnesses: ./ .... / PrmtName ',.,,,,,,, /<,'., ,, OWNER: SAXON MANOR ISLES APARTMEN'I'S II LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: SUNCOAST CORP. OF DELAWARE Ils General Panner Jac.~jBachman~, President Attest as to Chairman's signature DATED: ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk (CORPORATE SEAL) COUNTY: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLOR IDA BaT~a B.' Be~'y,'~-~ Approved as to form and legal sufficiency Hcidi F. Ashton Assistant County Attorney 6 · '- OR: 2400 PG: 0046 16A STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ,)d.- day of /',-/,' 1998 by Jack J. Bachmann, President of SunCoast Corp. of Delaware, General Partner'o f Saxon Manor Isles Apartments II Limited Partnership. He is personally known !o mc. or-has-produced --------- ....... (type of identification) as identification. s,gnature of person taking ackn°w~ledgmcnt Name of' Acknowlcdger Typed, l~inted or Stamped jd/f/saxonmanor/agreement 3 *** OR: 2400 ?G: 0047 16/% EXHIBIT "A" SAXON MANOR ISLES APARTMENTS II PROPERTY OESCRIPllON A PORTION OF THE EAST I/2 OF THE EAST ~/2 OF THE EASE THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION (5. TO'/,NSHID .50 SOUTH. RANGE 26 F. AST, COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. BFING N, ORF PARTiCULARLY DESCRIBE0 AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE NIORTiIEASr CORN?~' Of' SECTION 6. TOWNS}iIP 50 SOU~. RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER CCUNT~, F~ORt0A; ~ENCE RU~ S. 00'07'54' W., ALONG ~iE EAST dNF OF ~E NOR~EAST QUAR~R OF SA~O $[C~ON 6, FOR A DISTANCE OF 59,41 FEET TO POINT ON ~[ SOU~ERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY lINE CF RADIO ROAD 856); ~[NCE CONIlNUE S. 00'07'54' W.. ALONG THE EAST LIt;E 0F ~E NORTHEAST CUAR~R OF SAID SECTION 6. FOR A DISTANCE OF 1363.79 FEET FC ~E POINT OF 9EG~N~ OF ~E PARCEL QF LANO HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CCN~NL)E S.00'07'54' W., ALONG q([ EAST tINE OF D~[ NOR~/AST OUAR~R OF SAID S[C~ON G, FOR A DISTANCE O¢ 1~95.05 FE[~ ~0 ~t'F EAST QUAR~R CCRNE~ 0¢ SA~D SECTION 6; D~ENCE RUN S 09'29'~u" W., ALONG ~[ LINE OF ~[ NOR~/AST OUAR~R CF SAID 5EC~0H 6, FOR A DISTANCE 329 92 FEF~ TO DiE SCU~'6'E5~ CORNER OF THE EAST MALF OF ]~[ EAS'F HAlF OF ~t[ EAST ,A: r OF ~E NOR~EAST CUARTER OF SAiU SECTION 6; DiEt, CE NUN N. O0'O;'22' E., ALGNC THE WEST LINE 0m ~f EAST HALF or ~HE EAST HA~ OF ~[ EAST HA~ OF ~E NORTHEAST CUAR~R OF 5A~D 5[CHON 6, FOR A D;STANCE OF 1254.00 FEET; ~ENCE RUN S. ~9'52'06" E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 6S.74 F~T: ~ENC[ RUN S. 00'07'54" W. FOR A 01STANCE OF 10.00 FEET; ~ENCE RUN 5. 89'52'06' E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 203.00 ~ET; ~ENCE RUN N, 00'07'54' E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 55.00 FEET; ~ENCE RUN S. 69'52'0~' E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 35.~5 FEET; ]HENCE RUN N. 00'07'54" E. FOR A DISTANCE OF 82 78 FEET: ]~ENCE RUN N, 89'52'06" W. FOR A O~S]ANCE OF 23~32 FEET, THFNCE RUN N. 00'07'22" E. FOR A DISTANC~ OF 76 24 FE~T; ~HENCF RUN 5. ~9'52'06' E. FOR A 0iS]ANCE OF ~0.57 FE~T; l~i[~lC~ ~UN S. 00'Cf'b4" 'W F'D;~ A DISTANCE Or 59 24 rE~r ~)~fNC~ ~UN S. ~9'b2'~)(,' E FOR A [)I5~ANC5 OF Date: To: From: Re: March 18, 1998 Ed Kant, Senior Engineer Transportation Administration Judy Akel, Deputy Clerk Minutes & Records Department Inter-local Agreement Between the South Florida Water Management District and Collier County for the Maintenance and Operation of Three Replacement Bridges at Bay West Nursery, Rose Lane and Nursery Lane over the Cocohatchee Canal. Enclosed please find one original of the above referenced document relative to Agenda Item #16B2, as approved by the Board of County Commissioners on March 17, 1998. If you should have any questions, please contact me at: (8406). Thank you. Enclosure C-8337 INTER. I.()CA I, A¢;REEMENT B ETWl.:EN TH E SOUTH FIA)RII)A WATER MANA(;EMENT i)ISTRICT A N i) COI,LIER COUNTY This AGREEMENT is entered into on o.¢a_./f' , 1998;. between "thc Parties." tile South l:h~rida Water Management I)i~trict. public corlmration of the State of Florida ("i)IY.'i'RIC'I"L and Collier County, a political subdivision of the Stale of Florida ("C()UNTY"). W ITN !'~S$ ETH THA T: WHEREAS, the I)ISTRICT is a public corporation of the State of Florida. crc;lied by the l~:lorida Legislature and given those powers and responsibilities enumerated in Chapter 373. Florida Statutes Io include entering into conlracls with public agencies, private corporations m' other persons; alld WHEREAS. the DISTRICT is planning to ,'eplacc three canal crossing strut;;,rcs on thc Cocohatchee Canal at Rose Boulevard. Nursery Lane and at tile western proFerty limit of the Bay West Nursery along County Road 846 in Collier County. Florida ("thc Canal Crossings" t: and WHEREAS, improved canal crossings lire needed lo enhance Ibc conveyance capacity of the canal for improvement of flood protection measures for public welfare: and WtlEREAS. the COUNTY is responsible for providing safe transportation need.,, Io thc rca;denis of Collier County. and operates and maintains thc secondary and arterial r,'ad acccsxcx I~* thc m;Ljor road networks; and WHEREAS. the Parties have identified the responsibilities of each pvrty in relation to thc construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of Ihe said crossings: and WHEREAS. tile COUNTY represents that it is qualified arid willing to provide said operation and maintermnce services; and the DISTRICT wishes to enter into an A(;REEMENT with the COUNTY; and W}iEREAS. the COUNTY warrants and represents thai it has no obligation or indcbtctlnc~,s thai wot, Id impair ils ability lc, fulfill the terms and conditions of this A(;REENIENT: and Contract No. C-8337. Page I off 168 2 WHEREAS, the Governing Board of the DISTRICT, at its February 12. 1998 meeting, has awarded this AGREEMENT to the COUNTY. NOW THEREFORE, the DISTRICT and tile COUNTY, ill consideration of the mutual benelits flowing from each to the other, do hereby agree/as follows: i.I 1.2 2,1 ARTICLE ! - STATEMENT OF WORK The DISTRICT shall, to the satisfactioti of the COUNTY, complete constrt,ctio,1 of the Canal Crossings. Subsequent to the construction and the COUNTY'S written notice of its inspection of the Canal Crossings. tile COUNTY shall perform operations and maintenance of the Canal Crossings in accordance with the COUNTY'S ongoing road and bridge maintenance plans and attached Exhibit "A-I" Statement of Work. It is tile intent and understanding of the Parties that this AGREEMENT is solely for the ben~fit ofthe COUNTY and the DISTRICT. No person or entity other than the COUN'I~' or the DISTRICT shall have any rights or privileges under this AGREEMENT in any capacity whatsoever, either as third-party beneficiary or otherwise. ARTICLE 2 - TERM OF THE AGREEMENT Tile period of performance of this AGREEMENT shall commence on the date of this AGREEMENT and continue t,ntil tile DISTRICT has provided a Bill of Sale to the COUNTY. The DISTRICT assumes no dui)' for supervision of the COUNTY. The DISTRICT provides no warranties, either express or implied, to the COUNTY or any other persons or entities as to the design, engineering and constructior~ of the Car:al Crossings. The provisions of this section shall survive the ter,nination or expiration of this AGREEMENT. 3.1 ARTICLE 3 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT/NOTICE The Project Manager for the DISTRICT is Clareqce S. Tears. Jr.. Director. Big Cypress Basin, at 6167 Janes Lane, Naples. FL 34109, telephone (941) 597-1505. The Project Manager for the COUNTY is Edward J. Kant, P.E.. at Collier County. County Government Center, 3301 Tamiami Trail East, Naples. FL 34112. telephone (941) 774- 8494. The Parties shall direct all matters arising in connection with the performance of this AGREEMENT, to the attention of the Project Managers for attempted resolt, tion or action. The Project Managers shall be responsible for overall coordination and oversight relating to the performance of this AGREEMENT. Contracl No. C-8337. Page 2 of 6 3.2 Ail notices, demands, or other communication,~ Io the COUNTY under this AGREEMENT shall be in writing and shall be deemed received if sent by certified mail. return receipt reqtsestcd, to: Collier County Transportation Services Dept. Attn: E.J. Kant. P.E. Cot, nty Government Center 3301 Tamiami Trail East Naples, FL 34112 All notices to thc DISTRICT under this A(;REEMENT shall be itl writing and sent hy certified mail to: 4.1 Big Cypress Basin Alt,l: Clarence S. Tears, Jr. South Florida, W;,tcr Management District 6167 Janes Lane Naples. FL 34109 The COUNTY shall also provide a copy of all notices to thc DISTRICT'.',; Pruject Manager. All notices required by this AGREEMENT shall be considered dcliv,:rcd- upon receipt. Should either p;,rty change its address, written notice of' .,ach new addrc~,.,, ~,hall promptly be sent to the other party. All correspondence to the DISTRICT under ti'tis AGREEMENT si'mil rcl'crcncc thc DISTRICT'S Contract Number C-8337. ARTICI,E 4- INDEMNIFICATION AND INSURANCE Regardless of the provisiom, of Article 1, the COUNTY assume.,, auy and all risks personal injury, bodily in. jury and property damage attributable to thc negligent act~ o~nissions of the COUNt' and the office'rs, employees, scrvanls and agents Ihereof. The COUN~, as a subdivision of Ibc st;tlc, warrants and represents that it is self'-fundcd for liability insurance, or has liability insurance, both public and property, with ,ach protection being applicable lo zl~c COUNTY officers, employees, scrx';mis and agents while acting within thc scope of their employment with thc COUNTY. Thc C()UN'i~' and thc I)LqTRICT further agree that nothing contained herein shall be ctmstrt~cd interpreted as (I) denying to cilhcr party any remedy or defense axailablc to such p;tny under the laws of the Stale of Florida: (2) the consent of the State of Florida or ils agents and agencies to be sued: or (3) a waiver o1' sovereign immunity o~' the State al' Florida beyond the waiver provided in Section 768.28. Florida Slatutcs. Cnntr:tct N~. C-8337. P;,ge 3 o1'6 5.1 5.2 6.1 6.2 7.1 7.2 A RTICI.,E 5 - TI';RMINATION/RI,~MEi)Ii~ If either party fails to fulfill ils obligations under this A(;REEMENT in a timely and proper manner, the other party shall have the right to terminate this A(;REEMEN'F by giving written notice of any deficiency. The party in default shall then have ten calendar days from receipt of notice to correct the deficiency. If the defaulting party fails to correct Ihe deficiency within Il'tis time. this AGREEMENT shall terminate at tile expiration of thc ten (10) day time period. If either party initiates legal action, including appeals, lo enforce this A(;REEMENT. tile prevailing party shall be entitled to recover a reasonable attor,ey's fee. based upon the fair market value of thc services provided. ARTICI,E 6 - STANDARDS OF COMi'I,,IANCI.~ The COUNTY, ils employees, subcontraclors or assigns, shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to tile pcrfl'~rrnance of this AGREEMENT. The i)ISTRICT underlakes no duty to ensure such compliance, but will attempt to advise the COUNTY. upon request, as to any such laws of which it has presen~ knowledge. The laws of the Stale of Florida shall govern all aspects of this .\(;REEMENT. In the event it is necessary for either parly to initiate legal action regarding this AGREEMENT, venue shall be in the Twentieth Judicial Circuit for claims under state law and in thc Southern District of Florida for ,'my claims which are justiciable in federal court. ARTICLE 7 - (;ENI'~'RAL PROVISIONS Notwithstanding any provisions of this A(;REEMENT to the contrary, the Panic,; shall not be held liable fl~r any failure or delay in the performance of this A(;REEME~;T that arises from fires, floods, strikes, embargoes, acts of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, outbreak of war, restraint of Government, riols, civil commotion, force ma. jeure. act of God. or for any other cause of the same characler which is unav~,idablc thn~,,,h Ibc exercise of due care and beyond the conlrol of the Parties. A key element of Ihe DISTRICT'S mission is environmental protection and enhancement. In furtherance of this mission: A. The DISTRICT encourages the COUNTY to use recycled paper for all reports, notices and correspondence, which are prepared as part of this AGREEMENT. All reports generated in connection with this AGREEMENT shall be printed on both sides of the paper on which it is prepared. The DISTRICT further encourages the COUNTY purchase recycled paper for use in its operations if recycled paper is reasonably Conlrlicl No, C-X337. Page 4 of 6 · '" 7.3 7.4. 7.5 7.6 7.7 7.8 conlpetitive with virgin paper. "Reasonably cost competitive" means thai recycled p:.pcr is no more than 10 percent nlore expensive than the alternative. B. The DISTRICT encourages the COUNTY to preserve and protect the environment vnd to conserve natural resources by prmnoting energy, water, and refuse conservvtion programs. in the event any provi,;ions of lhis AGREEMENT shall conflict, or appear to conflict, thc AGREEMENT. including all exhibits, attachments and all documents spec;f ;call.,. incorporated by reference, shall be interpreted as a whole to resolve any incon~,~,tencv. Failures or waivers to insist on strict perfomumce of any covenanl, condition, or provision of this AGREEMENT by thc Part;cs, their successors and assigns shall not k.~- dccmcd ;t waiver of any of its rights or remedies, nor shall it relieve thc other party from performing any subsequent obligations strictly in accordance with thc terms of this AGREEMENT. No waiver shall be effective unless in writing and signed by thc part.',' against whom enforcement ix sought. Such waiver shall be limited to prm'isions of this AGREEMENT specifically referred to therein and shall not be deemed a waiver of any other provision. No waiver shall conslilute a continuing waiver unless thc writing states otherwise. Should any term tlr provision of this A(;REEMENT bc held, to any extent, invalid or unenforceable, ax against any person, entity or circumstance during tile term hereof, by force of any statule, law. or ruling of any forum of competent jurisdiction, such invalidilv shall not affect any other Icrm or provision of this AGREEMEN'r, to Ibc extent that thc AGREEMENT shall remain operable, enforceable amt itl full force and effect cxtcn! permit;cd by law. This AGREEMENT may be amended only with thc written approval of the Partie~,. The captions of articles ;,nd paragraphs of this A(;RI';EMENT are l;ir convenience only and do not limit tlr amplify Ibc covenants and conditions of Ibis A¢;REEMEN'F. This AGREEMENT st;ties the entire understanding and agreement he;ween the Partic~, and supersedes any and all written or oral representations, statements, negotiations, or agreements previously existing between the Parties with respect to lhe subject matter of Ibis AGREEMENT. The COUNTY recognizes thai any representations, statcmcnt~ or negotiations made by DISTRICT staff do not suffice to legally bind thc i)ISTRICT in a contractual relationship unless they have been reduced to writing and ~igncd by an authorized I)iSTRIC~ representative. This AGREEMENT shall inure to ~l~e bcncfil of and shall be binding upon thc Parties. their respective assigns, and successors m intcrc~. Conlracl No. C-X337. Page 5 of 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties or their duly aulhorizcd representatives hereby execute this AGREEMENT on the date first written above. I,I:.(iAI. J:I)RM APPR¢IVF, I) SI.3,VMD Ol-+lCE OF CoUNSl.:l. SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, BY ITS GOVERNIN(; BOARD By: Deput~,-Exccuti,~e Director APPROVED AS TO FORM & I.EGAI. SUFFICIENCY: COLI.IER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Tho.ms C. Palmer Assi~tanl County Attorney AT'[ [- ..,T: O~Ir',kll [, BPOe, CLEf:.K ~ttest as to Cha~man'$ s~gnature only, Contract No. C-8337. Page 6 of 6 ] ....[[[ [[] ......... _ .............. I[] I Exhibit "A- 1" STATEMENT OF WORK I! The objectives of this contract are to provide for the ownership, operations, and maintenance of three bridges crossing the Cocohatchee Carrel in Collier County, Florida. These bridges are Bay West, Nursery Lane, and Rose Boulevard. !.2 Scope of Services Task I- Construction The District shall construct three bridges on the Cocohatchee Canal in Collier County according to the attached plans. Contract drawings bear the following general title; Cocohatchee Canal Bridges - Bay West Nursery, Nursery Lane and Ro::c Boulevard. The drawings are filed under Drawing No. BCB-FEMA-100. Task 2 - Inspection After construction, the County shall inspect the bridges and provide written approval and acceptance of the bridges to lhe District. The District will provide a Bill of Sale to the County at no cost to the County. The County will assume ownership of these bridges. Task 3 - Right of Way Permit The County shall apply for a right-of-way permit for the three bridges constructed in Task 1. The application fee may be waived. Task 4 - Operations and Maintenance The County shall perform operations and maintenance of the accordance with the county's on-going road and bridge operations. canal crossings in · 'O th Flor, da Water Management D strict 3S~0oII ~, C'lub Road. X'e,, ,'alto Ilcach. ,'%rida 33406. (%1)6S6-SS00' 1"[. WATS TI)l) (~61 ) 697-2574 ADM 28-06 April 20, 1998 ','7 Mr. John Boldt Collier County Public Works Division Collier County Government Center, Bldg. H 33{}1 East Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Subject: Contract No. C-9700 Lely Area Stormwater Management Dear Mr. Boldt: Enclosed please find one ( I ) fully executed copy of the above referenced contract. any questions, please contact me at (561) 687-6373. Thank you for your efforts on behalf of the District. , ,.~ncerel,y,~ Jim Robinson ~T. Contract Administrator ,4'rocurement & Contract Administration /DLK Enclosure c: Office of Counsel Gail Abbott if you have V:.r.i M. L'arlt r l,h,.h.ml A. *l.:,:hck Willia,,, E. (;t.,l:,tll~ .M:,:h.wl I)..Xli::::,,: .~ll~hacl Will::.,: I l..,.::..:d .Miriam Sim:er .M.fili::g :\ddrc~,: I'.( I. Box 24t~I. XVc,t I~,lhn Beach, I"1. ( '-9701! OR $1NAL COOPEI;tATIV E A(;i'IEENI ENT B ETW E EN TI ! E SOI. JTil FLORIDA %VATER MANACEMENT DISTRIC'I' AND COLIJEFt COtlNTY This A(;REEMENT is entered into on .~, ~ r'~_,,- \ k~__, 19_c't._1'__, between "tile Part'es.' tile Soulh Florida Water Nlanagemenl District. a public corporation oF tile State o£ Florida ("tile I)ISTIIIC'i"'). and ('oilier County, a political subdivision o£ tile State of Florida. ('Yhe ('()lINTY"). W ITN F.,~ S EI'I I T! i AT: \VI II!Ri!,.\.%. tile I)iS'I'RI(T is a public corporation of tile St:itc of Florida. cremed by file I:lorlda l.cgislalure and g~ven lhoso powers and responsibilities enumerated in Chapter 373. Florida ~laltll¢s Io include entering snto COlllrilcIs with public agency,ts, privale corporalions or oilier persons, alld WI IHRi'L.%S, the I)IS'i'I~,I(;I' desires lo assist the COIIN'i'V in the preparation ot' eng~neer,ng plans fnr Phase I construction of the l.elv ..\rea SIormwater Nlan;u._.,elnent ProJect; and V,'I II:'i,',I'.';\S, tile COIIN'i'Y represenls that it ~s tlual~l'ied and w~lling ~o :;rovide said services. and th~ I)ISTRIC'I' wi.shes to enter into a ACi~I'~Ei~'II.;NT with the fTOIIN'I~'; \VI II'.'RI'L.\S, the ('OI. IN'l'%' warrants and represents Ih:il it has ilo obligation or indebtedness Ih;ti would impair ~ts abel,tv 1o full*ill tile lernls ;,,nd conditions o1' tl,~s ..\GllEE~{IENT: \VIII!Ri!,.\S. ;he (;overnmg Board or' tile i)IS'I'I,~I('I', a~ its ..\pril i(,. 199~ mec~in~, has awarded this ACI,IEI{Mi'.'NT to tile ('OI~N'I'Y. NOW TI IF. I,',I'.'I:OI,',I.~. tile I)iSTRI(TI* and tile (~OIIN'I*Y, irs consid~:ration of' the mutual benefits flowing from each to the other, do hereby agree as follows: ARTICLE I - STATEMENT OF WORK I.I The COUNTY shall, to thc satisfaction of the DISTRICT, fully and timely perform ali work items described in thc "Statement of Work," attached hereto as Exhibit "A," and made a part of this AGREEMENT. 1.2 it is the intent and understanding of the Parties that this AGREEMENT is solely for the benefit of the COUNTY and the DISTRICT. No person or entity other than the COUNTY or thc DISTRICT shall have any rights or privileges under this AGREEMENT in any capacity whatsoever, either as third-party beneficiary 9r otherwise. ARTICLE 2 - TERM OF THE AGREEMENT 2.1 The period of performance of this AGREEMENT shall commence on the date of this AGREEMENT and continue until the completion of all contractual obligations by the Parties, but in no event later than nine months from the date the DISTRICT issues a Notice-to-Proceed. 2.2 The Parties agree that time is of the essence in the performs:ncc of each and every obligation under this AGREEMENT. ARTICLE 3 - COMPENSATION/CONSIDERATION 3.1 As consideration for providing the goods and services required by d~is AGREEMENT, the DISTRICT shall pay the COUNTY an amount not to exceed Sixty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($60,000.00), as specified in Exhibit "A." Such amount includes travel and other expenses which the COUNTY may or may not incur and therefore no additional consideration shall be authorized. 3.2 The COUNTY assumes sole responsibility for all work performed by the COUNTY pursuant to Exhibit "A," including but not limited to, the design and development of detailed construction plans for the Lely Area Stormwatcr Management Project. By providing funding hereunder, the DISTRICT does not make any warranty, guaranty, or any representation whatsoever regarding any of the work performed hereunder. including but not limited to the adequacy or sufficiency of all or any part of work described in Exhibit "A." Contract No. C.9700. Page 2 of 10 4.1 4.2 4.3 ARTICLE 4 - INVOICING AND PAYMENT The COUNTY'S invoices shall reference thc DISTRICT'S Contract Number C-9700 and shall bc sent to thc following address: South Florida Water Management District Alln: Division ,,f l~rocurement and Conlracl Administration P.O. Box 24680 3301 Gun Club Road West Pahn Beach, FL 33416-4680 The COUNTY should not submit invoices to any other address at the DIS'I'RICH'. The COUNTY shall submit invoices on a completion of deliverable ba:',l';, pursuant to the schedule outlined in Exhibit "A." The DISTRICT shall pay the full amount of the invoice within thirty (30) days of receipt and acceptance, provided the COUNTY has performed tile work according to the terms and conditions of this AGREEMENT. However, fifilure by the COUNTY to follow the foregoing instructions may result in an unavoidable delay of payment by the DISTRICT. 5.1 5.2 ARTICLE 5 - PROJECT MANAGEMENT/NOTICE The Project Manager for the I)ISTRICT is Gail Abbott, at 61t,7 Janes Lane, Naples FL 34109, telephone (941) 597-1505. The Project Manager fi~r Iht COUN'Ut' is J,hn Boldt, at Collier County Public Works Division, Collier County Government Center. Bldg. H, 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, FL 34112, telephone (941) 732-250!. The Panics shall direct all matters arising in connection with the performance of this AGREEMENT. other than invoices and notices, to tile at~cn~ion of the l'rojcc~ Managers for attempted resolution or action. The Project Managers shall be responsible for overall coordination and oversight relating to the performance of this AGREEMENT. All notices, demands, or other communications to the COUNTY under this AGREEMENT shall be in writing and shall be deemed received if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to: Collier County Public Works Division Attn: John Boldt Collier County Government Center Bldg. ~t, 3301 E. Tamiami Trail Naples, FL 34112 Conlracl No. C-9700 - Page 3 of 10 Ali notices to the DL~;TRICT under thi: AGREEMENT shall be in writing and sent hy certified mail m: South Florida Water Management District Attn: Division of Procurement and Contract Administration 3301 Gun Club Road P. O. Box 24680 West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680 The COUNTY shall also provide a copy of all notices to the DISTRICT'S Project Manager. All notices required by this AGREEMENT shall be considered delivered upon receipt. Should either party change its address, written notice of such new address shall promplly be sent lo Ihe olher party. All correspondence to Ibc DISTRICT under this A(;REI,;MI.;NT shall relerenc¢ thc DISTRICT'S Contract Number C-9700. 6. I 6.2 6.3 ARTICI.,E 6 - 'FERMINATION/REMEI)iES If either party fails to fulfill its obligations under this AGREEMENT in a timely and proper manner, the other party shall have the right to terminate this A(;REEMENT by giving written notice of any deficiency. The party in default shall then have ten (10) calendar days from receipt of notice to correct the .deficiency. If the defaulting party fails to correct the deficiency within this time, this A(;REI,;MI.;NT shall terminate at the expiration of the ten (10) day time period. The DISTRICF may terminate this AGREEMENT at any time k)r convenience upon thirty (30) calendar days prior written notice to the COUNTY. The performance of work under this AGREEMENT may be terminated by the DISTRICI' in accordance with this clause in whole, or from time to time in part, whenever the DISTRICT shall detemfine that such termination is in the best interest of the DISTRICT. Any such termination shall be effected by delivery to the COUNTY of a Nofice of Termination specifying the extent to which performance of work under the AGREEMENT is terminated, and tile date upon which such termination becomes effective. In the event of termination, tile DISTRICT shall compensate the COUNTY for all authorized and accepted work performed through the termination date. The DISTRICT shall be relieved of any and all future obligations hereunder, including but not limited to lost profits and consequential damages, under this AGREEMENT. The DISTRICT may withhold all payments to the COUNTY for such work until such time as the D/~TRICT determines tile exact amount due to the COUNTY. If either party initiates legal action, including appeals, to enforce this AGREEMENT, Contract No. C-9700 - Page 4 of 10 6.4 6.5 thc prevailing party shall be entitled to recover a reasonable attorney's fee, based upon the fair market value of the services proyided. The DISTRICT anticipates a total project cost of Three ltundred Thirty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($330,000.00), of which the DISTRICT is funding Sixty Thousand Dollars and No Cents ($60,000.00), with the balance of matching funds in lite amount of Two Ih,ndrcd Seventy Thousand Dollars and No Cents (5270.000.00) to be obtained from Ihe COUNTY. h! the event such funding becomes unavailable. that shall be good and sufficient cause for tim D£~;'I'RICi' to terminate this AGREEMENT pursuant to Paragraph 6.2, above. In the event a dispute arises which the Project Managers cannot resolve between themselves, the Parties shall have the option to submit to non-binding mediation. Tl~e mediator or mediators shall be impartial, shall be selected by the Parties, :,nd the cost of the mediation shall be borne equally by tile Parties. Tile mediation process shall be confidential to the extent permitted by law. 7.1 7.2 ARTICLE 7 - RECORDS RETENTION / OWNERSHIP The COUNTY shall maintain records and the DISTRICT shall have inspection and audit rights as follows: A. Maintenance of Recorqls; The COUNTY shall maintain all financial and non- financial records and reports directly or indirectly related !o thc negotiation or perform:race of this AGREEMENT including supporting documentation for any service rates, expenses, research or reports. Such records shall be maintained and made available for inspection for a period of five years from completing performance and receiving final payment under this AGREEMENT. B. Examination of Records; The DISTRICT or its designated agent shall have the right to examine in accordance with generally accepted governmental auditing standards all records directly or indirectly related to this AGREEMENT. Such examination may be made only within five years from the date of final payment under this AGREEMENT and upon reasonable notice, time and place. C. Extended Availability of Records for Legal Dispute,s; In the event that the DISTRICT should become involved in a legal dispute with a third party arising from performance under this AGREEMENT, the COUNTY shall extend the period of maintenance for all records relating to the AGREEMENT until the final disposition of the legal dispute, and all such records shall be made readily available to the DISTRICT. All documents, including, but not limited to, technical reports, research notes, Contract No. C-970A) - Page 5 of 10 scientific data and computer programs in draft and final form including thc source code and object code, which arc developed by the COUNTY in conncclion with this AGREEMENT, may be utilized by Ibc DISTRICT in its normal course of business. DISTRICT use may include, but shall not be limited to, reproduction, distribution and preparation of derivative works. 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.4 8.5 ARTICI,E 8 - STANI)A RI),',; ()F COMI'I,IANCE The COUNTY, its employees, subcontractors or assigns, shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the performance of this AGREEMENT. The DISTRICT undertakes no duty to ensure such compliance, bul will attempt to advise thc COUNTY. upon request, as to any such laws of which it has present knowledge. The laws of the State of Florida shall govern all aspects of this AGREEMENT. In ,he event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this AGREEMENT, venue shall be in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit for claims under state law and in the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. The COUNTY shall allow public access to all project documents and matmials in accordance with the provisions of Chapter !19, Florida Statutes. Should the COUNTY assert any exemptions to the requirements of Chapter 119 and related Statutes, the burden of establishing such exemption, by way of injunctive or other relief as provided by law, shall be upon the COUNTY. Pursuant to Section 216.347, F.S.. the COUNTY is prohibited from the expenditure of any funds under this AGREEMENT to lobby the Legislature. the judicial branch. or another state agency. In the event that the COUNT3t"s performance, as required by this AGREEMENT. involves the use and/or delivery of a software, hardware and/or firmware product of any kind, the following language shall apply: COUNTY represents and warrants that the software, hardware and/or firmware is designed to be used prior to, during, and after the calendar year 2000 A.D., and that the software, hardware and/or firmware will operate during each such time period without error relating to date data, specifically including any error relating to. or the product of, date data which represents or references multiple centuries. Without limiting the generality of thc foregoing, COUNTY further represents and Contract No. C-9700 - Page 6 of 10 nine Ill Ill ........... warrants: 8.6 That the software, hardware and/or firmware will not abnormally end or provide invalid or incorrect results of date data, specifically including date data which represents or references multiple centuries. That the software, hardware and/or firmware has been designed to ensure Year 2000 Compatibility, including, but m)l limited to, date data century recognition, calculations which accommodate same century and multiple century formulas and date values, and date data interface values that reflect the century. That the software, hardware and/or firmware includes Year 2000 capabilities. For the purposes of this AGREEMENT, Year 2000 Capabilities means tile softwar,=, hardwa[e and/or firmware: will manage and manipulate data involving dates and leap year calculations, including single century formulas and multi-century formulas. and will not cause an abnormally ending scenario within thc application or generate incorrect values or invalid results involving such dates; and (ii) provides that all date-related user interface functionalities and data fields include the indication of century; and (iii) provides that all date-related user interface functionalities include tile indication of century. Included as part of this Year 2000 Compliance Warranty, COUNTY shall provide to the DISTRICT, at no additional charge with, (i) fixes, corrections and updates to tile software, hardware and/or firmware that are necessary to ensure Year 2000 Capabilities, as defined herein, and (ii) advice, consultation and assistance to use the software, hardware and/or firmware and diagnose and correct Year 2000 Capability problems that may exist with tl~e software, hardware and/or firmv, are. The term Year 2000 Compliance Warranty shall mean, collectively, the warranties set forth herein. The COUNTY hereby assures th;~t no person shall be discriminated against on file grounds of race, color, creed, national origin, handicap, age, or sex, in an),' activity under this AGREEMENT. The COUNTY shall take all measures necessary to effectuate these assurances. Contract No. (7-9700 - Page 7 of Il) 9.1 9.2 ARTICLE 9 - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PA RTIES Thc COUNTY is an independent contractor and is not an employee or agent oi' the DISTRICT. Nothing in this AGREEMENT shall be interpreted to establish any relationship other than that of an independent contractor, between the' DISTRICT and the COUNTY. its employees, agents, subcontractors, or assigns, during or after the performance of this AGRI,;EMI,;NT. Tile COUNTY is free to provide similar services for others. Tile COUNTY shall not assign, delegate, or otherwise transfer it:; rights and obligations as set forth in this AGREEMENT without the prior written consent of the DISTRICT. Any attempted assignment in violation of this provision shall be void. 10.1 10.2 10.3 10.4 ARTICLE 10 - GENERAl, PROVISIONS Notwithstanding any provisions of this A(;REI,;MENT to thc ccmtrary, ~he Parties shall not be held liable for any failure or delay in the performance of this AGREEMENT that arises from fires, floods, strikes, embargoes, acts of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, outbreak of war, restraint of Government, riots, civil commotion, force majeure, act of God. or for any other cause of the same character which is unavoidable through the exercise of due care and beyond thc control of the Parties. Failure to perform shall be excused during the continuance of such circumstances, but this AGREEMENT shall otherwise rem;~in in effect. This provision shall not apply if tile "Statement of Work" of this A(;REEMENT specifies that performance by COUNTY is specifically required during thc occurrence of any of tile events herein mentioned. In tile event any provisions of this AGREEMENT shall conflict, or appear to cot~tlict. the A(;REEMENT, including all exhibits, attachments and :ill documents specifically incorporated by reference, shall be interpreted as a whole lo resolve any incon,~istency. Failures or waivers to insist on strict performance of any covenant, condition, or provision of this AGREEMENT by the Parties, their successors and assigns shall not be deemed a waiver of any of its rights or remedies, nor shall it relieve tile other party from performing any subsequent obligations strictly in accordance with thc terms this AGREEMENT. No waiver shall be effective unless in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. Such waiver shall be limited to provisions of this AGREEMENT specifically referred to therein and shall not be deemed a waiver of any other provision. No waiver shall constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing states otherwise. Should any term or provision of this AGREEMENT be held. to any extent, invalid or unenforceable, as against any person, entity or circumstance during the term hereof. Contrac! Nh. C-9700 - Page 8 of I0 by force of any statute, law, or ruling of any forum of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect any other term or provision of this AGREEMENT, to thc extent that the AGREEMENT shall remain operable, enforceable and in full force and effect to the extent permitted by law. 10.5 This AGREEMENT may be amended only with the written approval of the Parties. 10.6 This AGREEMENT states Ihe entire understanding and agreement between the Parties and supersedes any and all written or oral representations, statements, negotiations. or agreements previously existing between the Parties with respect to the subject matter of this AGREEMENT. The COUNTY recognizes that any representations, statements or negotiations made by DISTRICT staff do not suffice to legally bind the DISTRICT in a contractual relationship unless they have been reduced to writing and signed by an authorized DISTRICT representative. This A(';REEMENT shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the Parties, their respective assigns, and successors in interest. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties or their duly authorized representatives hereby execute Contract No. C-97(g) - Page 9 of 10 ...... ~11 I I III II I IIIIII IIIII ......... I ........................ I this AGREEMENT on the date first written above. I,EGAI, FORM APPROVED ~D OmCE O~' ,,^T,.:: ~ttest as to ChaPman's Stgnatur~ ~nly. Attest: DWight'~. Brock. Clerk SOUTil FLORll)A WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRIC'I', BY ITS GOVERNING BOARD By: cutive Director COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Approved as to form and legal sufficiency A~.dstant Courtly Attorney Contract No. C-07¢X). Page I0 of I0 EXtlIBIT "A" STATi,~MI,~NT OF WORK PREPARATION FOR PHASE I CONSTRUCTION I,EI,Y AREA STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT 1.0 INTROI)UUI'ION Since 1983 the Big Cypress Basin Board (BCBB) has been participating with Collier County (County) to develop a water management plan to relieve thc chronic Ilooding problems in tile Lely Basin and thc related environmental problems in the receiving estuaries. Thc South Florida Water Management District (District) funded previous studies in 1985 and 1987 to develop a water management plan for this area of lilt County. Thc BCBB has supported the project. Aflcr many years of planning, the County is moving fi~rward to implement thc recomrnencl;,.:ions of thc Water Managemen~ District No. 6 Master Plan Update, which the BCBB funded in 198.5. A Municipal Service Taxing and Benefit Unit will be created to help fund the majority of the construction cost of the project. The Lely and Lely Manor Basins are the County's first priority for stormwater improvements. The BCBB may participate in a funding partnership for the components of the stormwater improvement project which meet the goals of the BCBB's mission statement, Ihat is, flood protection and environmental enhancement. 2.0 SCOPE OF WORK This contract provides funding from BCBI~ to the County for field surveys and tile preparation of dclailed engineering plans for Ihe Phase I construction of the l.ely Area Stormwater Management Project. 3.0 WORK BREAKDOWN STRUCTURE Two specific tasks shall be completed under this contract. Task 1: Construction Design The County shall prepare the design for tile Phase i construction of the Lely Area Stormwater Management Project. The design shall incorporate the findings from the following activities: a) b) c) Field investigations to accurately determine the basin boundaries for design and funding district. Detailed field surveys of proposed spreader waterways and a water level control structure site for Phase i. Geotechnical investigations of rock depth. Page I of 2. Exhibit "A." Agreement No. C-97¢X) Task 2: Detailed Construction Plans Thc County shall prepare detailed construction plans, specifications and bidding documents for Phase I. The documents shall include thc following: a) Computation of estimated construction costs and olher project related expenses for all phases of the project. b) Sketches and legal descriptions necessary to complete casement acquisition for Phase I. c) Final detailed construction plans, specifications and bidding documents for Phase 1 The plans shall be delivered to the District at the 30%, 90% and final completion stages as set forth in the Payment and Deliverable Schedule below. 4.0 TIME SCHEI)UI.,E AND TIME FRAMES This contract shall begin as the permitting and final design nears completion. The revised permit applications are expected to be completed in February 1998. This contract shall be completed nine months after the District issues a Notice-to-Proceed. The first deliverable shall be completed three months after the Notice-to-Proceed, as more fully outlined in Section 6.0. below. 5.0 PROJECT LOCATION The Lely and Lely Manor basins lie in southwestern Collier County within Water Management District No. 6, east of Naples and within the urban boundary. Lely basin is 12.5 square miles and the Lely Manor basin is 3.4 square miles. 6.0 i'AYMENT AND I)I,;I,IVERABI,E SCiiEI)UI,E Task Deliverable Due Date* I Payn~era No. I Completed Design Report 3 months $6,000 2A Completion of 30% Construction Plans 6 months $12,000 and specifications 2B Completion of 90% Constructon Plans and 8 months $36,000 specifications 2C Final Construction Plans, specifications 9 months $6,000 and bidding documents Total $60.000 'roceed P:tge 2 of 2. Exhibit "A." Agreement No. C-9700 RESOLUTION NO. 98- ?~ A RESOI,UTION OF TIlE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COi,I,IER COUNTY APPROVING EXPENDITURE OF UP TO $2,000 FOR COI,LIER COUNTY PARTICIPATION IN A YOUTllS' MIDNIGIIT BASKETBALl, TOURNAMENT IN ORI,ANDO, FI.ORIDA, A VALID PUBLIC PURPOSE. WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 87-5 allows expenditure of County fimds lo effectuate thc purposes of thc Ordinance provided thc cxpcndilurcs arc approved by thc Board Ihrough an implcmcnting Rcsolution setting Iot'th thc purposes of irc expenditures; and WHEREAS, these expenditures arc not specifically listed in thc expenditure categories set forth in Collier County Ordinance No. 87-5; and WltEREAS, the subject Midnight Basketball Program League provides "at .'~sk" youth an opportunity lo participate in these ~vholcsomc. organized, structured actMtics; anti WItEREAS. ten (I0) basketball players have been choscn because of their exemplary behavior with Midnight Basketball and constructive activities in the Golden Gate Community. NOW, TllEREFORE, BE IT RESOI.VED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that: Expenditures of up to $2.000 for the scheduled Youth Midnight Basketball Tournament in Orlando, Florida. from April 9 through April I I. 1998, are hereby determined by thc Board to serve a valid public purpose and are hereby approved. These expenditures arc for hotel rooms and per diem meals for thc selected ten players who will be participating in this Tournament in Orlando. and at least two chaperones. These fixnds are from private donations and arc budgeted in the Golden Gate Community Center Fund 130. This Resolution adopted after motion, second and majority vote favoring same. DATED: March 17, 1998 . ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK. CLERK Deputy Clerk lt~est as to Chatr~an'~ signature on BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA App/~d as to form an,d legal sufficiency: Thomas C. Palmer Assistant County Attorney -I- CLERK TO THE BOARD INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 7240 2294473 OR: 2399 PG: 3376 Ir, t~e GFPICZU, HCORD$ 0[ COLLE~P. RESOLUTION NO. 98- 7~2 A RESOLUTION APPROVING SATISFACTION OF LIENS FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS THAT HAVE PAID IN FULL THE 1994 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS. 16D WHEREAS, pursuant Io Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, the Board of County Commissioners on August 22, 1995 adopted Resolution No. 95-475 authorizing the recording of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1994; and WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, requires the Board to approve by Resolution and record in the Official Records a Satisfaction of Lien on all accounts that have been paid in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of the 1994 Service Year Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Special Assessment for the following accounts numbered below, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. 95-475, whereupon a lien had been recorded on real property pertaining to lhe accounts identified herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts identified herein are hereby approved and the Chairman is hereby authorized to smgn on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, and the Clerk is directed to record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien individually in the Dfficial records of Collier County: Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. 893 1672 1944 2215 2286 3117 3162 3340 3719 5801 6981 7346 7359 7896 7951 8109 8248 8895 9056 9085 9179 10061 10935 11015 11031 Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Accour.' No. Account No. Account No. Account No, Account No. Account No. Account No, Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No, Account No. Account No. Account No, Account No, Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No. Account No, Account No, Account No. Account No, Account No, Account No. Account No, 12140 12205 12315 12551 12878 13547 14708 15888 15930 15969 16120 16722 16780 17271 17899 18018 18209 18500 18759 19185 19347 20019 20349 20459 21076 21432 21995 22185 22680 23197 23401 23870 24772 25234 25593 26194 26220 26602 26673 26709 27009 27546 27627 28448 28613 385 1708 3311 5995 6486 OR: 2399 PG: 3377 *** OR: 2399 PG: 3378 *** 16D 1 This Resolution adopted lhis/~_.~..~day of ~, 1998 after motion, second and majority vot~. ATTEST: DWIGHT Eo BROCK, CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: , David.Weigel -- County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN Attest as to Chalrean'$ sfgnature onl$. This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294474 OR: 2399 PG: 3379 *** CLERK TO lHE BOARD EXl 7240 Property Folio No: 00099120001 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Thomas D & Sandra G Glidden 845 Limpkin Rd Naples, FI 339640000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Six Dollars and Seventy-Two Cents ($106.72) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 23 47 27 E 75FT PF W1/2 OF NWl/4 OF SWl/4 OF SW1/4, LESS S 30FT 1.08 AC OR 949 PG 916 + 917 & OR 1062 PG 651 Folio No. 00099120001 Project No. 64000 Account No. 893 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /'~ day of ~ ~ ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chairman's signature on]~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294475 OR: 2399 PG: 3380 *** CLERK TO THE 30ARD ZNTER0rr CE EXT 7240 Property Folio No: 00207240003 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Raymond A & Debra M Lowe 1230 Immokalee Rd Naples, FI 339630000 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 36 48 26 Wl/2 OF Wll2 OF E 1/2 OF N 112 OF S 1/2 OF SW1/4 OF NWl/4 LESS S 30FT OR 1603 PG 2215 Folio No. 00207240003 Project No. 64000 Account No. 1672 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /'Y-c_.~ day of '-~A.~L~.~- ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk ,~,..,,...,.~.,..- .~.~....,~:,.,/ Attest ag :[% Chairman's signature only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294476 OR: 2399 PG: 3381 *** RBCORDID ~n O~ICIAL R~CORD~ of CLERK TO THE BOA"D 1 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 7240 Property Folio No: 00258160006 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORID^ was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Keith T & Jeannine M Dion 5 Random Ln Andover, MA 018100000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 13 49 25 TIMBERWOOD OF NAPLES (HO) PAR 3323 AS DESC IN OR 1305 PG 2067 BEING A PART OF THE SI/2-NW- SW Folio No. 00258160006 Project No. 64000 Account No. 1944 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board. this ./_~_:~:;4., day of '~%,-gx..~.~ ., 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chafrman's signature on I,v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORID/', BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney ,3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294477 OR: 2399 PG: 3382 *** CLERK TO THE ~0ARD ~. 6D 1 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 7240 Property Folio No: 00301720005 .SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Larry R & Cheryle Lee 2425 12th Ave SE Naples, FI 339640000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 13 49 27 E1/2 OF N1/2 OF El/2 OF Wl/2 OF Sl/2 OF NE1/4 OF NEll4 1.25 AC OR 1000 PG 1744 Folio No. 00301720005 Project No. 64000 Account No. 2215 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County. Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this z'~' ~x. day of ~;"~. ~ ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk ) j' / Attest as tc Chafrman.$ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294478 OR: 2399 PG: 3383 *** INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 7240 Property Folio No: 00335760002 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN 'BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Ezequiel & Clara L Alvarez 3001 Smith Rd. Naples, FI 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 30 49 27 E1/2 OF NE1/4 OF SE1/4 OF SW1/4 5 AC. OR 1389 PG 880-881 Folio No. 00335760002 Project No. 64000 Account No. 2286 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /p-.~;4. day of "7,k~,.~.~..~ ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk ¥/~ . ,: . .,' .'. '~'.':;'A-'. '..~'..-~<.. : ~":'-'.,' / Attest as to Chalman'$ ~ ~gnature BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARB~RA-I~' BERRY', CH~ iR~N This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294479 OR: 2399 PG: 3384 *** let=: CLERK TO THE BOARD~ ~D I ' EXT 7240 Property Folio No: 00766800007 SA I FACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Serafin R Sosa & Esmundo Sosa, Jril East c/o Serafin Rafael Sosa 701 Alton Gloor Blvd Brownsville, TX 785210000 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 20 51 27 COMM Nl/4 CNR SECT 20, S 1381.21FT, W 1113.63FT TO POB, W60FT, S 135FT, E 60FT, N 135FT, TO POB OR 1000 PG 1030 Folio No. 00766800007 Project No. 64000 Account No. 3117 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ._/?:-c;c day of ~--//-t.o.,~--' ~, 1998. ATTEST: DVVIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk Attest a~ to Chatrean'$ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294480 OR: 2399 PG: 3385 *** To .0 .0 1 6D 1 NTE.0F CE .T. F oo. EXT 7240 Property Folio No: 00768680005 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Christina E Davenport Tangle R Davenport 15090 Maple Tree Dr Naples, FI 339620000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 20 51 27 BEG NW CNR SEC S 74.84FT, E632.2FT TO POB, S135FT, W 60FT, N135FT, E60 FT TO POB F/K/A SEC 17-51- 27 PAR 59.19 AC OR 1918 PG 1299 Folio No. 00768680005 Project No. 64000 Account No. 3162 Collier County, a political subdivision of the Stale of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of ~ o.~.~-.--" ., 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk ·,/.,..- '~ .... ,/ , '.~-.",~,~-'/', ,.,: ,,,,'.., .,// Attest as to Chairman's signature BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294481 OR: 2399 PG: 3386 *** Re:n: EXT 7240 Property Folio No: 01134800803 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That Ihe BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Randal & Mildred J Daniels 1866 E Cotton Road Electic, AL 320240000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 13 52 29 UNRECORDED PAR 12 DESC AS: COMM AT E1/4 CNR SEC 13, N 68DEG W 987.57FT S 42DEG W 37FT, N 52DEG W 134.40FT. N 97FT N 88DEG W 612,20FT, S Folio No. 01134800803 Project No. 64000 Account No. 3340 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida. hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien, The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Salisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of ___~Z~ ~' _, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chafrean's signature only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA This instrument prepared by: David C, Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Altorney 3301 East Tamlami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294482 OR: 2399 PG: 3387 *** CLERK TO THE BOARD [NTEROFF[CE 4TH FLOOR l~lD 1 EXT 7240 Property Folio No: 22621000001 SATISFACTIO OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Richard M Treiser Tr 801 12th Ave S Fourth FI Naples, FI 339400000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099. Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: AVALON EST UNIT 1 BLK 1 LOT 30 OR 1080 PG 1962 Folio No. 22621000001 Project No. 64000 Account No. 3719 Collier County. a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Sa~icfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /'~-~ day of __~,'z.t~,--- ~, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chal~an'$ signature on17. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294483 OR: 2399 PG: 3388 *** llCO~OiO In O~EI:IAL RI¢ORD$ O[ COLLI!R CO~?!, CLERK TO THE 80ARD i 60 1 INTEROFFICE 4TH FLOOR EXT 7240 Property Folio No: 30682440003 SAT___.ISFACTION OF LIE._.._~N KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: San Juana Garcia P O Box 1543 Immokalee, FI 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 14'~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Six Dollars and Seventy-Two Cents ($106.72) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: EDEN PARK BLK 3 LOT 12 OR 1310 PG 637 Folio No. 30682440003 Project No. 64000 Account No. 5801 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cant. els Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this _z,"Z.~r.~-- day of ~7),~ ¢u~.,- ~, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as[o Chairman's stgnature only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774.8400 *** 2294575 OR: 2400 PG: 0134 *** C0?IS$ :.oo Rets: Property Folio No: 35765240002 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a cedain Lien against: Gary M & Julia J Sluder 1823 43rd St SW Naples, FI 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures lhe principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 2 BLK 45 LOT 19 OF 1556 PG 193 Folio No. 35765240002 Project No. 64000 Account No. 6981 Collier County. a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereb,/ acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ?? ~c day of ~_~_~ _, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as ko Chairman's signature OhiO, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294576 OR: 2400 PG: 0135 *** RlCORDID in O~I¢IIL R~COR~$ of COLLIER COUP?Y, ~L Retn: CL~RiTOTE!~OA~D i 6D 1 II? Property Folio No: 35986760002 SATISFACTIONO_ F LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Luther & Katherine Jones 4780 28th Ave SW Naples, FI 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14'" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 3 BLK 86 LOT 17 OR 815 PG 541 Folio No. 35986760002 Project No. 64000 Account No. 7346 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day o~' ~~,-~ _, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest ~s to Chairman's signature only.. BOARD Of COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294577 OR: 2400 PG: 0136 *** 03tlS/t! at 10:4IA~ D~IGET !. HOC[, Retn: II? Property Folio No: 35987360003 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Ralph A Pollio Jr P O Box 1385 Naples, FI 339390000 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 3 BLK 86 LOT 32 OR 1279 PG 2228 Folio No, 35987360003 Project No. 64000 Account No. 7359 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recorc~ing of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of ~.z~.~L~..~ __, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk ~ttest as to Chalraaa'l Hgnatur~ onl.v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRM~N This instrument prepared by: David C, Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294578 OR: 2400 PG: 0137 *** iN?IRO~HC! 4T~ !ZT Property Folio No: 36112080005 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Benson C McCreary 4801 23rd Ave SW Naples, FI 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14'~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099. Pages 1338 through 1574. in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundrd and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104,37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 4 BLK 120 LOT 13 OR 961 PG 969 Folio No. 36112080005 Project No. 64000 Account No. 7896 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satis,~action of the Lien end hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ..~.~..~ day of __~ ~ ~, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chairman's signature only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294579 OR: 2400 PG: 0138 *** RK YI! ~.0O lit 7210 Property Folio No: 36117240002 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Wilbur C & Peggy A Lehman 1960 51st St SW Naples, FI 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 4 BLK 127 LOT 2 OR 1399 PG 711 Folio No. 36117240002 Project No. 64000 Account No. 7951 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien end hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /~-~;~_. day of ___~ ~L.~X--" __, 1998, ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHA)RMAN Attest as to Chairman'S signature on]~. This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294580 OR: 2400 PG: 0139 *** Rets: CLIRK fO ?N! ~OARD IN?,RO,,I¢, 47,,LO~t ~.60 1 Property Folio No: 36124080006 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Richard T & Catalina Novotny 4948 18th Ct SW Naples, FL 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 4 BLK 137 LOT 8 OR 1165 PG !292 Folio No. 36124080006 Project No. 64000 Account No. 8109 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ,/~-~J-. day of ~ ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chafr~an'S stgnature on I:. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294581 OR: 2400 PG: 0140 R~CO~D~D in O~ICIA~ R~COaDS of COLHER ~O~TL Property Folio No: 36130440009 SATSF C N FLIE KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: John W & Anita R Wainscott 5015 17th Ave SW Naples, FI 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT4 BLK 145 LOT4 OR 1282 PG 147 Folio No. 36130440009 Project No. 64000 Account No. 8248 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cance~s Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in Ihe official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of "-'/~ c~-.~*..--- _, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest as to Chatraan's signature on)]. BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAI'RM~-N This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294582 OR: 2400 PG: 0141 *** RfC ~! CO~I~S letn: ll~l~O~fI~! 47~ ~LOOR !I? Property Folio No: 36306600000 SA I F CT OF LIE KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Rodney D Velez 2332 55th Ter SW Naples, FI 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14'~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred and Eight Dollars and Seventy-Four Cents ($208.74) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 6 BLK 190 LOT 11 OR 1268 PG 1349 Folio No. 36306600000 Project No. 64000 Account No. 8895 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida. to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of _____~,z,~_J~ __, 1998. ATTEST: DVVlGHT E. BROCK, Clerk s ~at. urm' on 1;. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA · :--' BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294583 OR: 2400 PG: 0142 *** R~CORD~D In O~FICtAL R~COR~ ~! C;LLH~ C~U~, ?L 1 6 D 1 Property Folio No: 3631476000 S TISF C ON OF LIE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: David F. & Dana A. Andersen 5067 23rd Ct SW Naples, FL 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14'~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2(399, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida, The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 6 BLK 197 LOT 24 OR 1432 PG 1530 Folio No. 3631476000 Project No. 64000 Account No. 9056 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County. Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this _/__2-~ day of ~~ _, 1998. A'I-rEST: DWIGHT E. ~ROCK, Clerk Attest/as · .... ~u %~141t'laatl'S sfgnature on I$. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294584 OR: 2400 PG: 0143 *** RIC0~DID in 0UI¢IAL ;lC0~S 0f C0LH!~ ¢0~;T¥, ~L 03/1~I~ it lO:il~ OiI~T !. ~FCC[, {HFK Retn: '&O 1 Property Folio No: 36320200004 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Duane D. & Deborah Nusz 5484 27th PL SW Naples, FI 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 6 BLK 220 LOT 3 OR 1288 PG 712 Folio No. 36320200004 Project No. 64000 Account No. 9085 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby canals Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County. Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of _~o--/---~'~ _, 1998. ATTEST: DVV1GHT E. BRQCK, Clerk Attest, as to Chalraan's signature onl]. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294736 OR: 2400 PG: 0473 *** RIC0RDID i~ 0~rI¢I~L £1C0R~ Of ~OL~I~ ¢O~TL lit Property Folio No: 36322440008 SA ISF C ION FLIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Sherri L. Bossi 5451 27th PL SW Naples, FL 33999 The Lien was recorded on the 14r~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court oY Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligalions against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 6 BLK 221 LOT 24 OR 1911 PG 1156 Folio No. 36322440008 Project No. 64000 Account No. 9179 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in fun satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ..Z~.C,~ _ day of ___'.'~z-x-c.~,-~ ~, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chofr'ean's s fgoature onlj, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294737 OR: 2400 PG: 0474 *** Re[~: C[,RK ?0 TH! BOARD i 6 D il? TNO Property Folio No: 3651040009 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Peter Concannon, ET AL Booth Farms Vichrs Hall Lane Boothstown Manchester, England M284HY The Lien was recorded on the 14'" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 8 PART 1 BLK 270 LOT 9 OR 1799 PGS 2005 & 2006 OR 1804 PG 1628, 1866 PG 125 Folio No. 3651040009 Project No. 64000 Account No. 10061 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaclion of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissionem of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of ti~S~ of Lien, by action of the Board this .z/'~'~ day of ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to $Ignature on BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLOF'IDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294738 OR: 2400 PG: 0475 *** RIC01DID tn 0~HCI%L ~IC0~H o~ C~LSH~ ~0H?¥, ~L letn: IN?BR0~lCi 4T~ FLOOR SIT 7240 Property Folio No: 37017080002 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: William R. Rosa Miguelina Leyva 730 11th St SW Naples, FL 339640000 The Lien was recorded on the 14r~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book ;.099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cnets ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 9 S 150FT OF TR 100 OR 1246 PG 2011 Folio No. 37017080002 Project No. 64000 Account No. 10935 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /?/-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-~ day of '-~ u.~_.~..~ ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as t~ Chairman's $1gnattc-e c, ~,!3' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHA[RMAN This instrument prepared by: David C, Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294739 OR: 2400 PG: 0476 *** ilCC~D!~ :n C!NCiA~ ~C;;i~ :f C~LLi~ OCTETS, FL Property Folio No: 37062920007 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Hollis E & Mary E.Foster 545 13th St NW Naples, FL 33964 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 10 N 75 FT OF TR 45 OR 958 PG 1662 Folio No. 37062920007 Project Na 64000 Account No. 11015 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acl<nowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this _/'?.-z:~ day of '7,~ ,za.~.~ __, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294740 OR: 2400 PG: 0477 *** ~et~: CLIR[ ?0 T~ BOAD ~Z? 7NO Property Folio No: 37066080008 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Larry E. & Rose Marie Tolley 4078 Green Blvd #2 Naples, FL 33999 The Lien was recorded on the 14'h day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 10 N 150FT OF TR 96 OR 1344 PG 2045 Folio No. 37066080008 Project No. 64000 Account No. 11031 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this _~_~.~_-¢_.X., day of ~?~ o..~_._.._~ _, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chafrman's Signature only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294741 OR: 2400 PG: 0478 *** :~FiiS 1.00 C~i~ TO T~! BCIRD i 60 1 Property Folio No: 37862360003 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Donald C. Milner 1720 18th Ave NE Naples, FL 339640000 The Lien was recorded on the 14" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 25 75FT OF 180FT OF TR 27 OR 1621 PG 349 1840-2274 Folio No. 37862360003 Project No. 64000 Account No. 12140 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of __..~ ,~---.--~ _, 1998. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ,"'.".'~".'~..'----"By r BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN Attest as to Ch:lrman'S signature This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294742 OR: 2400 PG: 0479 *** ~tn: ~RTIRC~I¢! I?~ ~LOOR Property Folio No: 37922080003 ATI F TIO OF I KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Juan & Margarita Tapia 4730 13th Ave SW Naples, FL 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14t~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 26 E 75FT OF W 150FT OF TR 22 OR 1144 PG 1954 Folio No. 37922080003 Project No. 64000 Account No. 12205 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of ~~.,~:~_~, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA . ~-.---c..~ BARB,~RA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN Signature This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294743 OR: 2400 ?G: 0480 *** RlC0~DI~ In O~FIClIL RICGR~f ~i :OLLIRE COUP?Y, FL 03/1g/9t at 12:077~ O~I~? l, ~R~CK, Retn: INT~ROFFIC! 4~ ~LOC~ Property Folio No: 37980800005 C OF KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Richard & Barbara Plaag 3290 11th Ave SW Naples, FL 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 27 TR 13 OR 1230 PG 2242 Folio No. 37980800005 Project No. 64000 Account No. 12315 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /"/-~.. day of ~'/~ a_~,_~..... _, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E BROCK, Clerk Attest ~s to Chatrean's sfgnature on]~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294744 OR: 2400 PG: 0481 *** Property Folio No: 37995840005 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Dennis E & Tammy L Hamilton 1480 39th St SW Naples, FI 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2D99, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 27 S 180 FT OF TR 162 OR 1264 PG 2106 Folio No. 37995840005 Project No. 64000 Account No. 12551 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ._/"7:~:~.. day of ---._~ ~ _, 1998. ATTEST: , DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chairman's signature only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA This instrument prepared by: David C, Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 2294745 OR: 2400 PG: 0482 1 60 Property Folio No: 38105320000 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Edward L. Kersey 3200 68th St SW Naples, FL 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 29 N 180 FT OF TR 59 OR 1062 PG 851 Folio No. 38105320000 Pr~ect No. 64000 Account No. 12878 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /g:z~,~ day of '-7,/) ~ ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chafrean,$ sfgnature onI~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples. Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294757 OR: 2400 PG: 0510 *** Re~: Property Folio No: 38506240006 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Herman P. & Brenda Williams 391 35th Ave NE Naples, FL 339610000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 36 E 105FT OF TR 77 OR 1208 PG 1824 Folio No. 38506240006 Project No. 64000 Account No. 13547 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /'"/'~., day of .. ~Z//a3---~-- 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chairman's signature onl]. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, N This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294758 OR: 2400 PG: 0511 *** CL,~KTOT~ ,0AR~ 1 6D IZ! 7240 Property Folio No: 41347280005 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Kathy Madercic Michael Madercic 3091 30th Ave SE Naples, FL 339640000 The Lien was recorded on the 14'~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2999, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 88 W 330FT OF TR 95 OR 1697 PG 2148 Folio No. 41347280005 Project No. 64000 Account No. 14708 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /'7-~ day of ~-'/J/~ ,1998. A'I-FEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA At~o:t os ~:$ Cha Iraan's BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN sfgnature on I;. This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294759 OR: 2400 PC: 0512 *** ~e~[: l%T Property Folio No: 48171280009 _SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Fred R & Irene M Lichtefeld 2840 Shoreview Dr Naples, FL 339620000 The Lien was recorded on the 14'h day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GULF SHORES BLK 2 LOT 21 OR 626 PG 1021 Folio No. 48171280009 Project No. 64000 Account No. 15888 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /'7~-c~c., day of '-?}?c~..~.... , 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chairman's signature onl]. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA R. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294760 OR: 2400 PG' 0513 INTBRO~FIC! ~TH IX? Property Folio No: 48730160007 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Charles & Georgiana Ostrander 2673 Arbutus St Naples, FL 339620000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred and Eight Dollars and Seventy-Four Cents ($208.74) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: HALDEMAN RIVER BLK A LOT 10 + S 27FT OF LOT 11 OR 1078 PG 1826 Folio No. 48730160007 Project No. 64000 Account No. 15930 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby ackr~owledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of th~s Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /P-~_x.. day of "7]] ~ ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as Lo Chalraan'$ sfgnature oniL BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294761 OR: 2400 PG: 0514 *** iMTIROFEIC! 4T~ ~L=O~ 1 &O 1 Property Folio No: 48782240001 SATI ACTION OF IEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: George Greenling 2202 44th Terrace SW Naples, FL 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14'" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued inlerest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: HALLENDALE LOT 60 + W25FT LOT 61 OR 1538 PG 1401 Folio No. 48782240001 Project No. 64000 Account No. 15969 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of ___.__'.~ ~t,.~,..~---' _, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chalraan's Signature onlj. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA l..S,, By BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294762 OR: 2400 PG: 0515 *** 1 6 0 t Property Folio No: 50890160003 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Rebecca Lynn Hoop 2807 Holly Ter Naples, FL 339620000 The Lien was recorded on the 14m day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: HOLLY TERRACE LOT 6 OR 1570 PG 1309 Folio No. 50890160003 Project No. 64000 Account No. 16120 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ../~'--~z. _ day of '-~/~'~-~ ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Attest as to Chafr~an'$ slgfla:ure onl]. BARBARA B. BERRY~ CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294763 OR: 2400 PG: 0516 Property Folio No: 52651560002 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Pedro Z. Valdez P.O. Box 94 Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Six Dollars and Seventy-Two Cents ($106.72) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: JOYCE PARK BLK C LOT 18 OR 451 PG 93 Folio No. 52651560002 Project No. 64000 Account No. 16722 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien a~d hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /'~ day of '7'r) z~.~.-~' ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chafrean,s Sfgnature onJ]. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294764 OR: 2400 PG: 0517 *** Property Folio No: 52851840001 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Thomas A & Klm S Di Bacco P.O. Box 28346 Panama City Beach, FL 32411-8346 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($10437) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as tollows: KINGS LAKE UNIT 1 BLK G LOT4 OR 1249 PG 1785 Folio No. 52851840001 Project No. 64000 Account No. 16780 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of lhe Board this ~ day of ___.~u~---~/ __, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest ~$ to Chairman'S signature onl$. BOARD Of COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294765 OR: 2400 PG: 0518 *** Property Folio No: 54550280009 LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Belen G. Adame 201 Dixie St Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 14m day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2.099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Six Dollars and Seventy-Two Cents ($106.72) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: LA VILLITA EST LOT 7 OR 257 PG 770 Folio No. 54550280009 Project No. 64000 Account No. 17271 Collier County, a political subdivision of the state of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of "'~_.~__).'~'~-~' _, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chairman's sfgnature onl]. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294766 OR: 2400 PG: 0519 *** Property Folio No: 56403640008 SATIS ACTION O LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Henry Jones, Jr. 421 Gaunt St Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Six Dollars and Seventy-Two Cents ($106.72) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: MAINLINE BLK 4 LOT 25 OR 549 PG 969 Folio No. 56403640008 Project No. 64000 Account No. 17899 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recordin9 of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of ~._.~ ~-~-~-' ~, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest a~ to Chalre~n'$ signature only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 '*** 2294777 OR: 2400 PG: 0549 *** lit Property Folio No: 56654840000 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Bradford T. & Patricia A. Price 1349 Freeport Ave Marco Island, FL 339370000 The Lien was recorded on the 14'" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: MARCO BCH UNIT 1 BLK7 LOT 15OR 1370 PG 1194 Folio No. 56654840000 Project No. 64000 Account No. 18018 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby ackn3wledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of ~ ,:,...4....,,~' _, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD Of COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294778 OR: 2400 PG: 0550 *** Property Folio No: 56731440006 .SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Gary Weinberg 824 Rose Ct Marco Island, FL 339370000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: MARCO BCH UNITS 1 +4 REPLAT BLK 132 LOT 11 OR 1275 PG 1379 Folio No. 56731440006 Project No. 64000 Account No, 18209 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknuwledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /?~_.~ day of "~?~ ,1998, ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk 4ttest as to Chafrean.$ sfgnatu~e only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294779 OR: 2400 PG: 0551 RetN: CL,~[ TO T~ ~OA~ I 6 D 1 Property Folio No: 56938000003 sATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Assoc Ins Specialists Inc. 935 Juniper Court Marco Island, FL 339370000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: MARCO BCH UNIT 4 BLK 122 LOT 9 OR 1663 PG 41B Folio No. 56938000003 Project No. 64000 Account No. 18500 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this ,Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /"/.-~,.;, day of , ~/,~-~-"~ ,1998. Al-rEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chatrsan's signature onil' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBkRA B. BERRY, CH'A ~MAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294780 OR: 2400 PG: 0552 *** IX? Property Folio No: 57387000006 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: John V & Eileen Acunto 249 Capistrano Ct Marco Island, FL 339370000 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September, 1995, in Oh'icial Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County. State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: MARCO BCH UNIT 6 BLK 251 LOT 6 OR 1340 PG 1462 Folio No. 57387000006 Project No. 64000 Account No. 18759 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County. Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /'?';Cz. day of ~'/}/~-~' ., 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk ~ttest as t.o Chefrean,$ s fgnature BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294781 OR: 2400 PG: 0553 ~CO~D~' [c ~FEiC[AL R~C~RDS cf ' '~ Property Folio No: 58049560003 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Donald K. Ross TR C/O Edward T. Laios TR P.O. Box 6777 Washington, DC 20020-0477 The Lien was recorded on the 14'" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574. in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($014.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida. described as follows' MARCO BCH UNIT 12 BLK 389 LOT 8 OR 1846 PG 1589 Folio No. 58049560003 Project No. 64000 Account No. 19185 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of '-? ~~),~~, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E, BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chairman's Sfgnature only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294782 OR: 2400 PG: 0554 *** Property Folio No: 59830160006 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Al D. Jr. & Elosia Fayard 3577 Estey Drive Naples, FL 339420000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against .real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: MAR LOU APTS CONDO #4 OR 1078 PG 519 W/D Folio No, 59830160006 Project No. 64000 Account No. 19347 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of ~'~.~ ., 1998 ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chafraan'$ sfgnature only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA'BT. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294783 OR: 2400 PG: 0555 *** Retn: D IN?IROE~I¢! ~?~ PLOOR Property Folio No: 61737640002 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Charles & Lori Holliday 2355 Della Dr Naples, FL 339640000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES FARM SITES N 82.5FT OF S 412.5FT OF Wll2 OF TRACT 40 UNRECD A/D Folio No. 61737640002 Project No. 64000 Account No. 20019 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida. to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /'A-C~ day of "7~] o.~.,_x~ - ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chairman's signature 0n)~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294784 OR: 2400 PG: 0556 *** letn: lit Property Folio No: 62041840005 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Howard R. Eiter P.O. Box 331 Naples, FL 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14'" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows. NAPLES MANOR UNIT 1 BLK 4 LOT 4 OR 628 PG 833 Folio No. 62041840005 Project No. 64000 Account No. 20349 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ?C-d7~ day of "-/',~ (z~,.~ .1998, ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK. Clerk Atte.~t a~ t,3 .rhalrman.$ s lg~atur,e on l.y. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 Property Folio No: 62046240008 *** 2294785 OR: 2400 PG: 0557 *** Retn: CLIRKTOTH~ BOA~= ~ 6D 1 lit 7240 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Luis A & Patricia A Carvajal 5205 Mc Carty St Naples, FL 339620000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obliqations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES MANOR UNIT 1 BLK 10 LOT 25, OR 1539 PG 2143 Folio No. 62046240008 Project No. 64000 Account No. 20459 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby ack.nowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this _/_~ day of ~..~ ~L~x~. ., 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest a~ to Chafcaan's Signature onl.~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAI'I This instrument prepared by: David C, Weigel County Attorney Office of lhe County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294786 OR: 2400 PG: 0558 *** Property Folio No: 62206800000 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Felix Lerch Family Trust 2669 Davis Blvd, Ste 101 Naples, FL 339620000 The Lien was recorded on the 14"~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Seventy-Four Cents ($104.37)plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES MANOR EXT BLK 11 LOT 36 OR 1637 PG;908 Folio No. 62206800000 Project No. 64000 Account No. 21076 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /~_., _ day of ~ ~ ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Cha~rean's signature only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294788 OR: 2400 PG: 0560 *** aZ? 72~0 Property Folio No: 62310040002 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Phillip A & Patricia Arena 5229 Jennings St Naples, FL 339620000 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES MANOR LAKES REPLAT BLK 5 LOT 19 Ot',' 1434 PG 682 Folio No. 62310040002 Project No. 64000 Account No. 21432 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /~;~_X., day of "-/,~ ~ ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk $ fgnature on BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294789 OR: 2400 PG: 0561 *** Property Folio No: 62641000009 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Natalie H. Barattini 650 97th Ave N Naples, FL 339630000 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES PARK UNIT 3 BLK 31 LOT 38 OR 569 PG 70 & OR 1191 PG 1541 Folio No. 62641000009 Project No. 64000 Account No. 21995 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /'2-~u day of '-?,~ ,z,,~J,.-~ .1998. ATI'EST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest os tc Chafrean'S Signature onl$. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY. CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Wetgel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294790 OR: 2400 PG: 0562 *** Property Folio No: 62703560005 ATI F CTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Phyllis Spampanato 677 91st Ave N Naples, FL 339630000 The Lien was recorded on the 14'" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099. Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES PARK UNIT 4 BLK 47 LOT 6 OR 1241 PG1588 Folio No, 62703560005 Project No. 64000 Account No. 22185 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this .Z_~' Cz.., day of ~ ~ __, 1998. -- ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chalraan's Sfgna:ure on t~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 2294791 OR: 2400 PG: 0563 *** t~CORDID ~ OUICIAL ~KOR~ :f C~LH~R ~O~T~, ~ Rein: CL~RK?~ ?H! BOAR~ 1 6D 1 ?ZiO Property Folio No: 62840280002 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Adefle Kuklenski 526 104th Ave N Naples, FL 339630000 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099. Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES PARK UNIT 6 BLK 73 LOTS 31 + 32 OR 458 PG174 Folio No. 62840280002 Project No. 64000 Account No. 22680 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of "~_~ ~u~,u,.~ _, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chalraan,e signature on17' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294792 OR: 2400 PG: 0564 *** il! 724~ Property Folio No: 63501000009 SATISFAC ION F LI KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Al F. Jr. & Eloisa Fayard 1105 Washington Ave Gretna, LA 700530000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Two Hundred and Eight Dollars and Seventy-Four Cents ($208.74) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NAPLES VILLAS BLK B LOT 20 OR 1165 PG 421 Folio No. 63501000009 Project No. 64000 Account No. 23197 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of _~.~~ ., 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest ~5 t.o Chairaan'l $ Jgnature on ].~, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By \ '"'"~ BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294793 OR: 2400 PG: 0565 *** 160 1 Property Folio No: 63854480004 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Jose L & Julia Villareal Rte #1 Box 101 Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of lhe Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Six Dollars and Seventy-Two Cents ($108.72 plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: NEWMARKET BLK 14 LOTS 11 + 12 OR 1342 PG 2197 Folio No. 63854480004 Project No. 64000 Account No. 23401 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County. Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ,,'~,~_-X~ day of ~/)/~<~--' ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E.'BROCK, Clerk Attest ,,~.~ to signat, ure BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294794 OR: 2400 ?G: 0566 *** ~etn: II?iRO[?ICl ITH ~LO0~ Property Folio No: 65073080005 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Annie G Thomas 605 S 5th St Immokalee, FL 339340000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Rec,~rd Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Six Dollars and Seventy-Two Cents ($106.72) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PALMETTO PARK BLK 3 LOT 6 OR 1626 PG 179 Folio No. 65073080005 Project No. 64000 Account No. 23870 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this / ~r_. day of ~'~ o.,/t.~_~ ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E, BROCK, Clerk Attest ~$ to Chalraan.$ Signature BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294795 OR: 2400 PG: 0567 *** UCOlOlO l~ O~IClA[ RICORD~ ~[ ¢OL/I~ :O~?T, ~L CLBRKTOTH! BOARD ]601 I~TUOUI¢! I?~ ~LOO~ Il? 7240 Property Folio No: 66930720009 SATISF CTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Silas Bacon 2815 Dunbar St Ft Myers, FL 339160000 The Lien was recorded on the 14m day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Six Dollars and Seventy-Two Cents ($106.72) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PINE GROVE LOTS 21 + 22 OR 276 PG 9 & 145 PG 407 Folio No. 66930720009 Project No. 64000 Account No. 24772 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of '-'~, ~ _, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to. Chafrean.$ Signature only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294796 OR: 2400 PG: 0568 *** IIC0I.~ID in OUICI~ IICO~D~ C[IH?0?~, BOARD 1 RI? Property Folio No: 68040240105 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Stephen Vatalaro Laurie J. Pierce 3470 Sacramento Way #1 Naples, FL 339420000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: POINCIANA VILLAGE UNIT 1 BLK A 1/2 INTEREST IN THE FOLLOWING: LOT 8 Folio No. 68040240105 Project No. 64000 Account No. 25234 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN VVlTNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of thi~, Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this _/__~.¢z, day of '-7'~, ~, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest :, to. Ch-:irman'S sfgna[ure only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294797 OR: 2400 PG: 0569 *** Property Folio No: 68342560004 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Roy G. & Susan E. Wilson 68 Isle of St. Thomas Naples, FL 339610000 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as fol'.ows: PORT AU PRINCE LT 68 OR 1357 PG 491 Folio No. 68342560004 Project No. 64000 Account No. 25593 Collier County. a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ,/~.,.-OC day of '~2; ~UL--,,..-~ .1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk ltte~t ~ to Chafrean's sfgnature onl~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARi~ARA B. BERR'~, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294802 OR: 2400 PG: 0575 *** 01/19/18 at I2:58PX DVlGH? !, BLOCK. ~8C ?!! 1,0~ ietn: Property Folio No: 70721080009 ,SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: James Y, Devigili 1620 Port Ave Naples, FL 339420000 The Lien was recorded on the 14'" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: ROCK CREEK PARK BLK B LOT 5 + N 55FT OF LOT 6 OR 2020 PG 2347 Folio No. 70721080009 Project No. 64000 Account No. 26194 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby ackpowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /~ day of '--,,,~ ~s~-..-, ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E, BROCK, Clerk ~ttest as to Chafraan,$ Sfgnature only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294803 OR: 2400 PG: 0576 *** Property Folio No: 70920960001 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Gary W & Nancy J Kearns 1123 Parkway Dr Naples, FL 339420000 The Lien was recorded on the 14r" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: ROCK HARBOR BLK D LOT 1 OR 955 PG 102 Folio No. 70920960001 Project No. 64000 Account No. 26220 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this / ~-c,c day of ~),~-<-~-~' ,1998. ' ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk 4ttest es to Chafraan's sfgnature only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of Ihe County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294804 OR: 2400 PG: 0577 *** Property Folio No: 71782040003 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Marilyn G. Ball 3020 Areca Ave Naples, FL 339620000 The Lien was recorded on the 14'" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: SABAL SHORES BLK E LOT 7 OR 1614 PG 1594 Folio No. 71782040003 Project No. 64000 Account No. 26602 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien ard hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of ~'~~ ., 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chairman's Signature onl]. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples. Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294805 OR: 2400 PG: 0578 *** RlC0~DI~ tn CUI¢,AL ~lCOR~S o~ C0L[II~ ¢0U~?T, ~ Retn: Property Folio No: 72380560007 .SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Raymond R. Stolte 190 Colfax Ave Clifton, NJ 070130000 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: SAN MARCO VILLAS II (CONDO) D-6 OR 1544 PG 222 Folio No. 72380560007 Project No. 64000 Account No. 26673 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County. Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /~'-~;~,.. day of .~'~. ~t,4,,_~- ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest e: tn Chub'man's signature on/]. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA RBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294806 OR: 2400 PG: 0579 *** Retn: Il? 7240 Property Folio No: 72382240008 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Mabel Hollman Peggy Jean Huegel 135 Leland Way #N-6 Marco Island, FL 339370000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of lhe Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: SAN MARCO VILLAS II (CONDO) N-6 DR 1578 PG 307 Folio No. 72382240008 Project No. 64000 Account No. 26709 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cane. els Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County. Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ?~ ~ day of ~,~O.,,L.,_~../ ,1998, ' ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chalraan'$ lfgnature on I]. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294807 OR: 2400 PG: 0580 *** IIC0RDID :~ 0~!CIA/IlC01DS ¢~ ¢0~11~ :0u~Y, ~L lit Property Folio No: 74411240003 SA ISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Jose R & Magdalena Garcia 3414 Seminole Ave Naples, FL 339620000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: SOUTH TAMIAMI HGTS BLK B LOT 19 OR 594 PG 483 Folio No. 74411240003 Project No. 64000 Account No. 27009 , Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of ~~., 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chatrman.s 'Signature only. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294808 OR: 2400 PG: 058! *** UCO~DI~ m O~C[A~ ~KORO~ cf co~:!~ COUNTY. ~ ~I~ ~eta: Property Folio No: 77111480005 KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Maria V. Vasquez 788 Park Shore Dr Apt C-29 Naples, FL 339400000 The Lien was recorded on the 14'" day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: TRAFALGAR SQUARE (CONDO) #101J OR 1348 PG 280 Folio No. 77111480005 Project No. 64000 Account No. 27546 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien, The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ dry of ~ ~ _, 1998. A'I-rEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk atte~t as to Ch~fra~. s fgnature on)y. s BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B, BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 2294809 OR: 2400 PG: 0582 03/I~/~! a~ I2:51F~ ORIG,! !, BR0C[, Re~n: IiTZR0~IC! !II 1 Property Folio No: 77160800005 .SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Secretary of US Dept of Housing & Urban Developement 1320 South Dixie Highway Coral Gables, FL 331460000 The Lien was recorded on the 14'~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Six Dollars and Seventy-Two Cents ($106.72) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: TRAFFORD PINE EST SEC I BLK 2 LOT 8 OR 2039 PG 2360 Folio No. 77160800005 Project No. 64000 Account No. 27627 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cance~s Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /~-;~:~... day of ~ ~ ,1998. " ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk at:est as to Chairman Signature only, 's BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERRY. CHAIRMAN - This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294810 OR: 2400 PG: 0583 HC HI C0PI!$ II! 72i0 Property Folio No: 81520240000 SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Wilbert & Lena A. Campbell 1223 Woodridge Ave Naples, FL 339400000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: WESTLAKE UNIT 2 BLK A LOT 8 OR 558 PG 497 Folio No. 81520240000 Project No. 64000 Account No. 28448 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /' 7'~-.~:~. day of '-/)~ o~_.--- ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as,to Chalrean's S fgnature on]~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BERI Y, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 *** 2294811 OR: 2400 PG: 0584 *** ReLn: Property Folio No: 81731120003 SAT C ION OLI KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Irene Lichtefeld TR 2840 Shoreview Dr Naples. FL 339620000 The Lien was recorded on the 14"' day of September. 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Flodda. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred and Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven Cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: WHISPERING PINES BLK B LOT 12 OR 617 PG 639 Folio No. 81731120003 Project No. 64000 Account No. 28613 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman. directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this ~ day of ~'~/~ _, 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chairman's ,signature onl]. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By BARBA. , B. BERm'. C.A,RMA. This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Altorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 Property Folio No. 00292880009 *** 2294815 OR: 2400 PG: 0588 *** ~lC01Di: In C?~:~iAL II~R~S cf CCLL;~ C0~?T, ~L ~et~: c.. ,o., ! 6 0 .SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Warren R & Debra L Plog 580 San Marcos Blvd Naples, FL 339420000 The Lien was recorded on the 14r~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Twenty Six Dollars and Ten Cents ($26.10) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: 31 49 26 Sl/2 OF Nl/2 OF SW114 OF NWl/4 OF SE1/4 LESS E 30FT, OR 1557 PG 911 Folio No. 00292880009 Pr~ect No. 64001 Account No. 385 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien, The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this/~.~_.~.day of .. '~/J~ ~ 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples. Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 Property Folio No. 36000680009 *** 2294816 OR: 2400 ?G: 0589 ~[T 7210 KNOWALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Douglas L Carter Jr. Elizabeth W Carter 4564 28th PL SW Naples, FL 339990000 The Lien was recorded on the 14th day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Seventy Eight Dollars and Twenty -Eight Cents ($78.28 plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real properly situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE UNIT 3 BLK 101 LOT 9 OR 1742 PG 490 Folio No. 36000680009 Project No. 64001 Account No. 1708 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board thi&/;~_,day of ~-'7~L ,,-~.---.- ., 1998. -- ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk attest as to Chafraan's s Ignature onl~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BARBARA B. BER~I~N This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 Property Folio No. 39207120000 *** 2294817 OR: 2400 PG: 0590 *** ~etn: FI? SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Ted A. Rankin 1480 Golden Gate Blvd Naples, FL 339640000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~' day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Twenty Six Dollars and Ten Cents ($26.10) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: GOLDEN GATE EST UNIT 48 W 75FT OF E 180FT OF TR 97 OR 1875 PG 1815 Folio No. 39207120000 Project No. 64001 Account No. 3311 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this/..~:t~ay of ~,~.'~,--- ., 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as t~ Chafrman's s Ignature on ]j~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDa. BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 Property Folio No. 67281440008 *** 2294818 OR: 2400 PG: 0591 *** CLBRKTOT"! BOARD [ ~)r3 1 SATISFACTIO_~ OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Karla Maria White 386 Ridge Dr Naples, FL 339630000 The Lien was recorded on the 14~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Seventy Eight Dollars and Twenty-Eight Cents ($78.28) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: PINE RIDGE EXT BLK H LOT 15 OR 1622 PG 1972 Folio No. 67281440008 Project No. 64001 Account No. 5995 Collier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this/_~...~-day of ~ 1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as to Chairman's signature on]$. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: k~. ~'~\ BARBARA B. BERRY, CHAIRMAN This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 Property Folio No. 71020241001 *** 2294819 OR: 2400 PG: 0592 *** I~TB~O~IC! (TH ~L~:F SATISFACTION OF LIEN KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Rosanna Coppola 3219 Crayton Rd Naples, FI 339400000 The Lien was recorded on the 14r~ day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of Twenty-six Dollars and Ten Cents ($26.10) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any. and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: ROSEMARY HTS ADD, LOT 52 OR 1513 PG 2216 Folio No. 71020241001 Project No. 64001 Account No. 6486 Collier County. a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida, to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County. Florida, acting through its Chairman. directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this/,~'=Zday of ~/,,~ ~ ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk Attest as Lo Chairman's Signature ofll7' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA , I AGREEMENT # 97CP-07-09-2 I-0 I- 104 MODIFICATION TO AGREEMENT WHEREAS. Collier County (hereinafter "the Recipient" ) and the Department of Community Affairs (hereinafter "the Department" ) have entered into an Agreement dated May 28, 1007 for the purpose of installing a redundant National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) weather radio transmitter in cooperation with the National Weather Service; and WHEREAS, based upon subsequent events, the panics desire to modify said Agreement to extend the period of Agreement; NOW, TltEREFORE, the above-referenced agreement is modified as follows: Paragraph 1II. This agreement shall begin upon execution by both panics and shall end September 30, 1998, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the provisions of Paragraphs VII or IX or XIV of this Agreement. Final requests for reimbursement should be submitted no later than thirty f30) days after the termination date oCthe contract. Any requests received after October 3 I, 1998, may, in the discretion ofthe Department, not be reir~bursed from this Agreement. Reimbursement requests shall not be submitted by facsimile transmission. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in fidl force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this modification to be executed by the undersigned officials as of the date listed below. RECIPIENT: COLLIER COUNTY BY: ~arbara~:B~'~', Chairman~'~ Collier County Board o£Commissioners DATE: DWIG IT E..ROCK, C .ER : Deputy Cle~'k~' STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS BY: '/ ~'?., , ', :.',, ~ Joseph F. Nlyers, Director DATE: :' ' ' ': .;9 .- ) C~' ') : I C'; ' ~ -; Approved as to Form and Legal Suffici~y Thoma~ C. Palmer, Ass~slant County Attorney' Attest as to Chatnian'$ signature onl$o RESOLUTION.NO, 98- 73 A RESOLUTION APPROVII~..~A'TJ.~3=,~J,ZON. OF LIENS FOR CERTAIN ACCOUNTS."ta-I~T, HAVE PA~U IN I~ULL THE 1994 SOLID WASTE COLLE~ rlOh AND DISPOSAL SERVICES SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, WHEREAS, pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, the Board of County Commissioners on August 22. 1995 adopted Resolution No. 95-475 authorizing the recording of notices of liens for the delinquent solid waste collection and disposal services special assessments for 1994; and WHEREAS, Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, requires the Board to approve by Resolution and record in the Official Records a Satisfaction of Lien on all accounts that have been paid in full. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, that pursuant to Collier County Ordinance No. 90-30, as amended, the Board recognizes full payment and receipt of lhe 1994 Service Year Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Special Assessment for the following accounts numbered below, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. 95-475, whereupon a lien had been recorded on real property pertaining to the accounts identified herein. The Satisfactions of Lien attached hereto referencing the accounts identified herein are hereby approved and Ihe Chairman is hereby authorized to sign on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners, and the Clerk is directed to record this Resolution and these Satisfactions of Lien individually in the official records of Collier County: ,~ccount No. 28626 Trois Resolulion adopted this/~x, day of "'/,~4c..~.e..~t~ . 1998 after motion, second and majority vote. ATTEST: DWIGHT E BROCK, CLERK Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: b'avid We,~el County Attorney Attest as to Chal~an's BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BAR-~RA a. BERRY,Ni;~~ *** 2294544 OR: 2400 PG: 0055 tlc ~I$ 6.00 CDHH 1.00 Il! 7240 This instrument prepared by: David C. Weigel County Attorney Office of the County Attorney 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples, Florida 34112 (941) 774-8400 16D 4 *** 2294545 OR: 2400 PG: 0056 *** ilC FSI ~.~0 ~.~ [K/IROFFICl 47H FLOOR lit 1210 Property Folio No: 81731800006 ATI ACTO OF LIE KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENT: That the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA was the owner and holder of a certain Lien against: Bernard =& Pearl M Hody % Grace Hody P O Box 10436 Naples, FL 33941 The Lien was recorded on the 14th day of September, 1995, in Official Record Book 2099, Pages 1338 through 1574, in the Office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, State of Florida. The Lien secures the principal sum of One Hundred Four Dollars and Thirty-Seven cents ($104.37) plus accrued interest and penalties, if any, and imposes certain obligations against real property situated in Collier County, Florida, described as follows: WHISPERING PINES BLK B LOTS 39 + 40 OR 1646 PG 645 Folio No. 81731800006 Project No. 64000 Account No. 28626 Col'ier County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereby acknowledges receipt of payment in full satisfaction of the Lien and hereby cancels Lien. The Clerk of the Circuit Court is hereby directed to record this Satisfaction of Lien in the official Records of Collier County, Florida. to acknowledge that the Lien ceases to exist. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, acting through its Chairman, directs execution and recording of this Satisfaction of Lien, by action of the Board this /2z'~;C day of ~ ~ ,1998. ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BRocK, Clerk Attest as ~¢ Chalr'man'$ signature on I.~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIOA BIC Ill t. O0 COPII$ l.O~ leta: CASHII~ SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 Gt, SHIE~NG FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: . TOMMIE HARRIS AKA TOMMY LEE HARRIS (08/28/56) CASE NUMBER: 97 1146 CFA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 7th day of November, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/IO0***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2364, page 1910. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs' that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this /~ day of ~' , 1998. ATTEST: dttest as to Chaf~a..$ s Ign?t.ure.~on]~. ~ / Clerk of Circuit Court BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Fa Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency Assistant County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 IICOIDID In OFFICIAL IlCORDB of COLLIKR C001TY, FL 02/10/S8 it IO:58AN DWIGH? I. BROCK, CLBR~ RB¢ FBB 6.00 COPII$ 1.00 letn: SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER ~I,~HI[RIN~ FOR CLERK'S USE ONLy KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: TABATHA ATASHA TOWNS AKA TABATHA ATASSHA TOWNS (06/17/76) CASE NUMBER: 97 2191 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 29th day of August, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****FIFTY AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2344, page 1125. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this /~.;d~ day of ~aw~a~,/ , 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency AssiStant Co~nty~Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 COPIlS 1.00 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICE8 OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 .... FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: , CARL CHRISTIAN BYERLEY (04/12/78) CASE NUMBER: 97 6484 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 12th day of August, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2340, page 1798. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this / ?~9 day of ~ , 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER~COUNTY~.L~ , BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal s~fficiency PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER eio.32111o *** 2294618 OR: 2400 PG: 0211 II~OIDID il OIIIClAL IICOIDS Of COLLIII COI2IiTT, 1.00 CASHIll .... FOR CLERK'S USE ONLy KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY; FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: , THOMAS WILLIAM GEORGE AKA THOMAS WILLIAM GEORGE (o5/3o/ 3) CASE NUMBER: 97 4203 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 10th day of July , 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND OO/1OO***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2332, page 1367. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this /7~ day of ~ , 1998. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Attest a;t0 ChaJraafl's COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA . stgnatureonl .* , ~~ BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency Assistant County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 htn: CASHII! FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a cartain lien against: . JUAN TORRES (03/13/63) CASE NUMBER: 97 7778 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the loth day of October, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2358 page 0253. ' The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this ATTEST: Attest as t'o Chairman's day of ~ 1998 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA signature only? Chairman Approved as to form legal su f f iciency)~/l.___ PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 ~J~'II£RING 2294620 OR: 2400 PG: 0213 IICOIDID in OHICIAL IICORD~ Of COLLIll CO~TT, ~r~ 02/U/~I g IO:5iAH DWIGHT I, HOC[, CUH UC FBI 6.00 COPII~ 1.00 CASHIER 6G1 FOR CLERK'S USE ONLy KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: , JAVIER FIGUEROA AKA JAVIER CASTRO FIGUEROA (11/17/60) CASE NUMBER: 97 8036 for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 17th day of November, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2370 page 3176. ' The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this .. /?~ day of ~ , 1998. ATTEST: Attest as to ChaJrsan's lerk of Circuit Court Approved as to form legal~~%[suffici~nc¥~ Assi~tant County Attorney BOARD OF COt~TY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Chairman PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 229 62! OR: 26UU IICOIDID ia OFFICIAL IICOIDS C0MI$ 1,0~ tern: SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 G/~ItlF. RING FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a ce)'tain lien against: , JOAQUIN CISNEROS (07/08/72) CASE NUMBER: 96 10412 for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 22nd day of July, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2340, page 1551. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this /~/Z~- day of signature only. , ./ Cle.~k of Circuit Court 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency Assistant County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 S&TISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 CASHIERING 2294622 OR: 2 00 PG: II¢ORDID in O)IICIAL IICORDS O( COLLIII COUKIT, 02/IS/98 aL 10:58~ D)IG~ !. BROCK, CLERK il~ FIB ~OPIIS 1.00 ReLn: CASHIE 1 6Gl FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: , OSCAR JOSE NUNO (12/21/78) CASE NUMBER: 97 1629 CFA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 24th day of October, 1997, recorded in office of the Cle~rk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2363, page 1797. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. Ex.e.c,u.ted this /?~ day of · . *ATTEST: Attest. as to Chairman's cl~r~ of circui~ Co~r~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. ~ , 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER~COUNTY~L~ , BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency ~ Assistant County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 *** 2294623 OR: 2400 0216 IICORDID ia OFFICIAL IIC01DS of COLLIIR COUNTY, FL 03/19/01 mt 10:$8A!( Drill!! I. HO¢I, UC FBI S.O0 COPIIS 1.00 leta: 16(;1 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 ~..,A,.~IIERING FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY,, KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: . ERNEST DEACOSTE (01/06/78) CASE NUMBER: 97 7447 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 19th day of November, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****FORTY AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2370, page 3166. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this //~;l::~r~ day of ~~w/ , 1998. · ATTEST: AtteSt as to Chairman's stgn~.~onlT: c.,~// Cler~ of Ctrcui~ C6urt BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONER~ COLLIER~~COUNT~.F BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency ~ Assistant County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 2294624 OR: 2400 PG: 0 1'/ IICOlOID t~ OFFICIAL IICORDI o! COLLIII COUITT, FL O]I1SB8 at 10:SIAl( DiIGHT I. BIOCi, CLIII COPIIS 1.00 letn: SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: . OMAR WILBERTO VENTURA AKA WILVER ANTONIO RIVERA (11/2o/75) CASE NUMBER: 97 8215 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 20th day of November, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2370, page 2821. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS W~EREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this /]~ day of ~~-'/ , 1998. signature BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency ^ ; Ass stant County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 IICOIOII il OlllClR~ 11C01~$ O! COLLIil CO0~T, fL 03/U/SI it 11:0011( OVIGH! I. BIOCl, CLIH IIC 111 S.O0 COPIIS 1.00 letn: SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 910-321110 CASHIERING FOR C~BK'$ USS ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: , TODD ALAN BYRD AKA TODD A BYRD (12/21/72) CASE NUMBER: 97 2592 MMA ~, for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 21st day of May, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2320, page 2553. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this /77~ day of ~ATTEST: tte. st as to Chairean's signature only. , 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER~ COUNTY~.LO~,,, BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER (~I0-321110 CASHIERING 2294629 OR: 2400 PG: 0225 IICORDID in OffiCIAL IICOID$ o[ COLLII! COMITY, fL UC Fll t.O0 COMIS !.00 letn: CASHIll 1Ggl FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: , ARTEMIO VALLADARES JR. (09/22/63) CASE NUMRER: 97 1216 CFA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 28th day of October, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2364, page 1924. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this /~3~ day of ~ , 1998. ATTEST :. Attest as to Chairman's signature only. .. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency Assistant County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 ~HH/H ~t ~I:~ ~¥Z~I~ I. HOC£, ¢~1~[ IIC HI ~,00 ¢0M15 1.00 Ittn: SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OP THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 CASHI~N~ FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIOHERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: , ANDRES DOMINGO (02/04/43) CASE NUMBER: 97 3568 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 19th day of May, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2341, page 3336. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this /?~ day of A~]ees]~S~ to Chat~an'$ signature , 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNT~ FLORIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency Assi%tant County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR BERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER xxx 2296b 1 UR: Z6UU 03/1S/9! l~ II:00AI DWIGHT I. BROCK, CLIIK HC FIB COHI$ 1.00 FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF CO~]~ISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: . EDUARDO BALLI AKA EDWARDO BALLI (09/11/67) CASE NUMBER: 95 6822 }4MA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 21st day of April, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Co11£er County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****FIFTY AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2308, page 1372. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this day of-'/~&,/ 1998 sJ.gnature 0n]$. Clerk of Circuit Court Approved as to form legal sufficiency. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Chairman PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 letn: CASHIII i661 FOR CLI~R~'s USE ONLy. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COM){ISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: . D~I~ V~LEZ (0~/03/79) CASE NUMBER: 97 8284 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 24th day of October, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****FORTY AND O0/iO0***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2364, page 1948. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this .'/~w~L day of~~'/ , 1998. ATTEST: Attest as to Chairman's s tcjnature only. ~, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency Assi rant County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 UCOIDID l~ OIlI¢IAL IICOIDS o! COLLIli CObH?Y, f~ fi/Il/SI at lhOOUI DWIGHT I. BIOCl, CLIH tlc FII 6.00 COPIIS 1.00 lt~l: 1 1 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 810-321110 //\ FOR CLERK'S us~ ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a cartain lien against: . WILLIAM JAMES HAMILTON AKA WILLIAM HAMILTON (05/01/62) CASE NUMBER: 97 0643 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 23rd day of September, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND O0/IO0***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2354, page 3396. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of sa~d Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this /g~ day of ~~-&~/ , 1998. ATTEST: Attest as to Chaf~mafi.'s Clerk of Circuit Court BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal, sufficiency Assistan~ County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER ~10-321110 *** 2294634 OR: 2400 PG: 0230 *** IICOIDID iEI OFFICIAL RICOID{ o! COLLIII COONTL FL 02/IO/Sl I~ II:OOAI( DIf~GHT I. BROCL CLH[ ilC Ill ~,00 COMIS 1.00 FOR CLEB~'S uSE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COM}4ISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: EDWARD HOBGOOD (06/01/78) CASE NUMBER: 96 9487 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 27th day of May, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/IO0***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2320 page 2435. ' The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this /~2~ day of ATTEST: Attest as to ChaJrman:s sJgnature~onl~. , / Cler~ of Circuitf Cdurt Approved as to form legal/ufficienc~ Asst'stant County Attorney ~~/ , 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Chairman PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OP LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 IIIIIll ........ ' - ...... IICOHDID in OFFICIAL RICOHDE o! COLLIER COUNTY, FL 03/19/08 at II:00~ DWIGHT I. BROC[, CLERK RIO Fl! 6.00 ltt~: FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: , TODD STEWART COUTURE AKA TODD COUTURE (08/19/76) CASE NUMBER: 97 5887 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 8th day of September, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****FIFTY AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2347 page 2207. , The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this /~f~, day of ~~-/ , 1998. A~.TTEST: test as to Clerk of' Circuit Court Approved as to form legal sufficiency o ,4.. c. Assistant Count~ Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS . BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 2294636 OR: 2400 ?G: 0232 llCOIDID ill OfflCI~ ~ICOI01 Of ~O~LIII COaNTT, 03/I~/91 at ll:00~ DWIG~ I. BR0C[, CLIRI glC ~ll ~,00 Rets: CASHIll .,, FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: . ROBERT THOMAS HEALY (12/07/65) CASE NUMBER: 97 0961 MBA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 23rd day of April, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2312, page 3167. SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 ~.RSHI£R~N G ! The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this _ ay of 99s. · ' ATTEST: Clerk of Circuit Court Approved as to form legal, sufficiency. Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ,,~~COLLIER COUNT~.FLORIDA , BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 -' -- IIIIIII II II III II'lrl~"~ UCOIDID tn OFFICIAL IICOIDS of COLLIIR COOlil, FL H/Is/si at II:OOAH DWIGHT I. BROCK, CURE letn: SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-32~I10 ~,A.~'IIEAIN G . FOR CLERK'S uSE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: , JOSE LUCAS PABLO (07/25/57) CASE NUMBER: 97 5144 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 7th day of July, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****FORTY AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2332 page 1350. ' The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. ExecUted this _/~ day of . ~~ 1998 ATTEST: . Attest as" t~" Chal~an's signature.only.' , ./ Cl6rk of Circu4t ~ourt-- Approved as to form legal sufficien~ ~ Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY~.L~ BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 *** 2294638 OR: 2400 PG: 0234 *** llCOlOlO ia O~ICli~ ~lCOi~$ of COLLII! CO,ITT, ~L 03/19/91 at II:OJAR DWIGHT I. BlO¢l, SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-32 ! ! ! o FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNO?~ ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: . DOMINGO ADAME (01/06/74) CASE NUMBER: 96 9115 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 23rd day of [~ccember, 1996, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****FIFTY AND OO/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2268, page 884. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this /7-~ day of AATTEST: tte~t as t6 Chafrman's dl~k of Circ'u(t 6ourt Approved as to form legal sufficiency As-4istant County Attorney , 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COM/~ISSIONERS COLLIER COUNT~, F~L~.RIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 *** 2294639 OR: 2400 PG: 0235 ilICORDED i~ O~ICIAL ~I¢ORD$ Of COLLIER COU~TT, 03119198 aL II:03AI( DWIGHT I. BlOC[, CLZB[ IIC FII &.O0 COPIIS 1.00 ~e~n: 1 6 1 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 FOR CLERK'S USE ONLy KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: . CRUZ RIOS ALQUICIRAS (05/02/71) CASE NUMBER: 96 10318 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 6th day of January, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****FIFTY AND O0/iO0***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2272, page 333. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed. this /?;~i~ day of ~ , 1998. ATTEST: Attest as to Chairman's BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency Assistant County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 01~321110 *** 2294640 OR: 2400 PG: 0236 RICORDID i~ O~ICIAL RRCORD$ of COL%,IIR COUR?T, 03/19/98 at II:03AN DWIGB? I. BROCK, CL~RK R~C ~B! ~.00 COPIES 1.00 Retn: CASHIBR FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: . MIGUEL PADRON (08/19/69) CASE NUMBER: 96 9763 M~ for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 26th day of December, 1996, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal Sum of ****FIFTY AND O0/iO0***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2268, page 871. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed th~s /~(~ day of ~ , 1998. ATTEST: Attest as to Chairman's Cler~ of Circuit Court BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLI~ER COUNT~.F~ BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form lega~ sufficiency As~ist~nt~Coun=y Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 *** 2294641 OR: 240G PG: 0237 *** 03/1g/gB aL %1:03~ DWIGE! I. BROC[, CLIR[ 1.00 Retn: SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: . RONALD SCOTT KERR (02/23/75) CASE NUMBER: 96 5427 M~4A for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 19th day of December, 1996, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****FOUR HUNDRED AND 00/iO0***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2269, page 1576. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this ./g~ day of ~~ , 1998. ATTEST: - Attest as to'ChaIrman's signatur4~ onl.v. ' ~-.?~ Clerk of Circuit Court BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLQRIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 *** 2294642 OR: 2400 PG: 0238 **1 RICOR0~D In 0~IICIAL RICOR0S of C0tLI~R ¢0UN?L ~t 03/19/98 a~ iI:03AE DIZGHT I. BROC[, CLERK COPIIS l,O0 Retn: CA$~IIR FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: JOEL DEJESUS VICHOT (03/27/64) CASE NUMBER: 95 4734 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the llth day of September, 1995, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2100, page 1453. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. ~ATTEST: ttest as to Chairman's Signature only. CleYk~ of Circuit'Codrt BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: B~rbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency AsSistant' County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 2294643 OR: 2400 PG: 0239 INCOI~I)ID ll~ O[[IClAI, i[ICO~ID$ Of COLLIli COUN?~, i"L 03/19/~8 aL ll:0)&~ D~IGR? I. H0¢I, CLHI ilC H! ~.00 ¢0PIgS 1.00 FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: CYNDI LYNN TUCKER AKA CYNDI LOUISE DAVIS (10/13/63) CASE NUMBER: 95 0342 CFA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 22nd day of August, 1995, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND O0/iO0***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in official Record book 2098, page 1287. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfactif)n of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this /~ day of ~ , 1998. TEST: . tect as to Chairman's $tgnatur9 ~n]y' ~ BOARD OF COUNTY coMMIsSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency Assistant County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 C,A~HIERING FOR CLERK'S USE ONLy KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: . GERMAN TORRES (05/28/68) CASE NUMBER: 95 2929 M~4A for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 24th day of July, 1995, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit' Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in official Record book 2084, page 0460. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS W~EREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this day of ATTEST: ~ttes~ as f.o Cler~ of Circui~ C6urt ~/ , 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency Assistant County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010~321110 xxx 229 b b OR: 2 UU PG: U2{1 RBCORDID in OUICIAL IICORD$ of COLLIER COUN?T, IL 03/19/98 1: 11:03~ DtIGE? i. BROCK, CLBH RIC ~1! t.00 COMIS ~.00 1661 , FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: EDWARD SPENCER VIGNEAU (11/03/74) CASE NUMBER: 97 1085 MI~A for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 26th day of March, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND O0/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2305, page 730. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this., /~/fS~ day of .ATTEST Attest as :to Chairman's signature only. > j Cle~-~ of C±rcu±t Court , 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COM~.IISSIONERE COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency Ass~sta-nt county Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE pUBLIC DEFENDER ~1~321110 CA.~IF-RJNG lite: 16Gl FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: , CHARLES SAMUEL DOYLE JR. AKA CHUCK DOYLE (09/12/69) CASE NUMBER: 95 6188 MI4A for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 9th day of October, 1995, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND O0/iO0***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2111, page 2128. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfacti.on of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Exec~u_ted this /?/f~O day of ~/~~/ , 1998. TEST:est as to Chairman's signature only. ~ ./ Clekk of Circuit Court BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency A l,~ County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 ~HIERIN~ Retn: 16G1 FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a aertain lien against: , MARIA VASQUEZ (07/17/75) CASE N~iBER: 97 5150 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 7th day of July, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****FORTY AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2332, page 1348. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this /~-/tk~ _day of ~ , 1998. ATTEST: Attest as to Chairman's signature only. . , ~, Cle~k of Circui't Court Approved as to form legal sufficiency Assistant Count~ Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Bar~ara B. Berry Chairman PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 1.0~ SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR 8ER~rICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 ~.~IIF.,RIN G / FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: FRANCIS KENNEDY AKA FRANCIS J KENNEDY (05/22/63) CASE NUMBER: 97 3376 M/4A for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 2nd day of December, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2370, page 2824. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its chairman. Executed' {his /7,,'~f:~ day of , 1998. ~'~/ A'~TEST :' -,' ..'Attest '.as to Chairman's 1(' ' stgnatur,~'only, c~ -- Clerk .of Circuit Court Approved as to form legal sufficiency~ Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONE',%S COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER *** 2294652 OR: 2400 PG: 0255 *** IlC0RDID in 0~ICIAL IZ¢0~D~ 0f ¢0LLII~ ¢0U~?~, ~ i~¢ 71! 6.~0 COPII$ 1.00 ... FOR CLERK'S USE ONLy KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: FRANCIS KENNEDY AKA FRANCIS J KENNEDY (05/22/63) CASE NUMBER: 97 3374 M~tA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 2nd day of December, 1997, recorded in office o'f the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ***"TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2370, page 2822. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. E×~cut~d this /f--~ d~,y of ~ ~ , ~99~. signature o~ly, BOARD OF COUNTY COM~ISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved as to form legal .sufficiency A tsta-nt Coun{~ Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 01~321110 CASHIERING \ Retn: ~ASHI~R *** 2294653 OR: 2400 PG: 0256 R]CORD~D In OF~ICIA~ RRCORDS of COLLIH COUNTT, 03/19/98 at ll:05AI( DWIGB? 1, BROCK, HC ~! ~.00 COMIS %,00 16 1 FOB CLERK'S USE ONLY. KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a c~rtain lien against: FRANCIS KENNEDY AKA FRANCIS J KENNEDY (05/22/63) CASE NUMBER: 97 3375 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 2nd day of December, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2370 page 2823. ' The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfacticn of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. this .day of ~~ , 1998. ATTEST: Attest as to Chairman's signature on!y. Cfe~k of. Circui~ C~ourt Approved as to form legal sufficiency i ' 'y Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 UE: Z UU ru; ...... ESC0RDD i~ OUICItL ILIC0JO$ o[ C0~[I[J C0gJtt, ~b 03/l~/g8 at 1t:05~ 01IGS! I. BROC[, C~JR[ UC ~ 6,00 ¢OPIiS 1,00 ~etn: SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 01C~321110 P..,ASHIERING FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: HECTOR ARELL~NO AKA HECTOR ARELLANO (01/16/79) CASE NUMBER: 97 9379 for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 3rd day of December, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/iO0***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2370, page 3195. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this /~L~ day of ATTEST: ,Atte.~,t as to C'liairman's signature only. ~ Approved' as to form legal sufficiency Assistant County Attorney ~o~ , 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 03/19/98 aL II:05A~ Di[GHT 8. BROCK, CLIR[ RJC ~J8 ~.00 C0PI85 1.00 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 G/~HI£RING FOR CLERK'S USE ONLY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: , EZEQUIEL CAMARGO AKA ETEQUIEL CA}~RGO (04/10/46) CASE NUMBER: 97 7773 }{MA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 17th day of November, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2370, page 2825. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed this /~ day of ATTEST: . ' · Attest as to £halrman's :.stg~,~ onl.~. ...~. aterk of Circuit Court ~~ , 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Barbar . , Chairman Approved as to form legal sufficiency Assistant County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 CASHIERING *** 2294656 OR: 2400 PG: 0259 *** ~CORD~D 1~ O~ICIA~ RBCO£D$ of COLLI]R COU~TT, FL 1.00 __FOR CLERK'S USE ONLy KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: YANNICK MARTEL (09/04/72) CASE NUMBER: 97 8085 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 17th day of November, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2370, page 2826. The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed'this 'ATTEST. . Attest as'to Chairman S signature only. , / ~Cl[erk of Circuit Court Approved as to form legal sufficiency Assistant Coun'ty Attorney _day of ~6~-~~/ ., 1998. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Barbara B Ber ~ Chairman PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER 010-321110 GA.,~IIERING *** 2294657 OR: 2400 PG: 0260 *** RICO~DID ~n O~HCIA~ ~CORD$ of CO~LI~Q COI~N?T, ~L I.O0 CAS~IIR FOR CLERK'S USE ONLy KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: MARC NASCIMENTO AKA MARC J NASCIMENTO (06/05/71) CASE NUI4BER: 97 8738 M]~A for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 7th day of November, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND 00/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2370 page 3194. ' The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed<this day of ~o~ , 1998. ATTEST: Attest as to Cha'trman's signature on]~,. ' ,...~ ~,x Clgrk of Circu/it Court BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman Approved. as to form legal sufficiency Assistant County Attorney PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 SATISFACTION OF LIEN FOR SERVICES OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER elO-32111o 2294658 OR: 2400 PG: 0261 *' U¢OR~D In O~ICIAL It~COQI)~ of ¢OLI. IIII CO~N?T, 03/]g/98 at ]I:05AN D~Z(;~T ~. BROCI:, Ct. IR[ I. O0 eeta: FOR CLERK'S USE ONLy KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS that COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, through its BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, is the owner and holder of a certain lien against: , DOUGLAS JOSE RAMIREZ (07/02/69) CASE NUMBER: 97 8881 MMA for services of the Public Defender, bearing the date of the 7th day of November, 1997, recorded in office of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, Florida, securing the principal sum of ****TWENTY-FIVE AND O0/100***********DOLLARS, under Final Judgement and Order recorded in Official Record book 2370 page 3193. ' The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County hereby acknowledges full payment and satisfaction of said lien, hereby surrenders the same as canceled, and hereby directs that the Clerk of said Circuit Court cancel this lien of record. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, hereby directs that this Satisfaction of Lien be executed in its name by its Chairman. Executed'-this ../g-~ ATTEST: Attest as to Chairman's ... signature only. day of ~aA~_-/ 1998 , · Approved as to form legal sufficiency Assistant County Attorney BOARD OF COUNTY COKMISSIONERS BY: Barbara B. Berry Chairman PREPARED BY: CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT P.O. BOX 413044 NAPLES, FLORIDA 34101-3044 I~;()ARI) ()1:(.'()11NI'Y C()MMI,NSI()NliI,'d-; M I,',;CI.H,I,.,\NI(()[ lg ('()I~,P, ILSP()Ni)i,;N(,i( M,,\RCII 17. 1998 I,'()R I~()/\RI)/\("I'I()N' 1. ,qatisfaction of I.icn: NI{I{I) NI()'I'I()N authorizing thc Chairman ~o sign Satislhction of l.icn tbr Services of thc l'uhlic l)clL'ndcr Ibr Case Nos,: 96-9115-MMA. 96-10318- N1N1A. 96-976~-NIMA.. 96-5427-NIMA. 95-4734-MMA, 95-0342-('FA. c).$ -_'t )_,t )-MNIA. 97-1085-NIMA. 95-6188-MMA. 97-5150-MMA. 97-2592-MMA. 97-1216-CFA. 97- 3568-MMA. 95-(~822-MMA. 97-8284-MMA. 97-0643-MMA. 96-9487-MMA. 97-5887- MMA. 97-0961-MMA. 97-5144-MMA. 97-I 146-CFA. 97-2191-MMA. 97-4203-M MA. 97-7778-M MA. 97-8036-MMA, 96-t0412-MMA. 97- 1629-('1:A. ~i7- 7447-MMA. 97-8215-MMA. 97-3376-MMA. 97-3374-MMA. 97-3375-MMA. 97-037t1- MMA. 97-7773-MMA. 97-8085-MMA. 97-8738-MMA. 97-888 I-MMA. MISCICI.I.,,\NI(()I IS ITIiMS T()l:ll.li I:()R RI!C()RI) WITII AC'TI()N ,'\S I)IRIK'TF.I): ('lcrk of ('(torts: ,~uhmillcd lbr public record, pursuant lo Florida ,qlalutcs. ('haplcr 136.1)6( 1 ). thc disbursements Ibr thc Board of Cotmtv Commissioners 1hr thc pcri,~d t:chruarv 6- 2(I. Minutes: I). ,', (i. Joint meeting of thc Board of I.cc £'ountv Cornmissioncrs. tt~c Collier County Ik)ard of Commissioners and thc U,S. Army Corps of Engincers- minutes lbr l:cbruarv II. 1998. Rcl~rrcdtoB('C. ('oilier ('ounty Airport Aulhority - minutes for December 15. 1997 and agenda for I:dwuarv 9. 1998. Referred to BCC. l~cach Rcnourishmcnt/Mainlcnanc¢ Commiltc¢ - agenda for February 12. 199S. Referred to I'imcrgcncy Medical .qcrviccx ,,\dvist)rv (_'ouncil -a~cnda for t:cbruarv 25. I,tcfcrr,,:d Io I~,('(' l(ntcrl'~risc Zone l)cvclopmcnt ,,\gene)'- IllilILIICS Ibr November 13. 1997. Rc fcrrc,.I to Imvircmmental Advisory l~;oard - minulcs for .hmuary 7. February 4. 1998 and agendas t'or February 4. and March 4. 1998. Referred to P,('C. (ioldcn Gate Bcautilicalion Advisory Committee - minutes o and agenda for February 10. 1998. Referred lo BCC. ~Immnry 1'~. 199/$ No '---~.c.~% ' ~ MAR 17 1998 II. .I. (). (). C'ollicr C'ounlv l listorical ~% Archaeological I'rcscrv;Uion Board - minut¢.~ for I;chruarv 20. 199~. Referred m It(.'(.'. ('oilier Cotmty I.andtlli ,v,: Mmcrbls Recovery Facility C'ifizcns Advi.,.;orv ('ommiuce - minutes o1' l)eccmher 1 I. 1997. Referred m 1½('C. l.clv (;old l{slates l~3cautitlcalion Advisory Commitl¢c- minutes for .lanuarv t,~. l~)gX ~md agenda for I:cl'~ru~u'v 13. l~)~)X. Roi'erred m 1;3(_'('. l.ihrary Advisory l?,oard - minulc.~ ol'.ltmuary 2~. 1998. Rcl~'rrcd m l~C'C'. Parks & Recreation Advisory Hoard - minutes For November 19. I~,X)7..kmuarv 28, 1908 and ~gcndas For .lanuarv 2I¢ & l:cbruary 25. 1998. Referred m [~(.'C. I'clican Hm,, MS'I'I~I I Advisory Committee - Hgcnda For March 4. 199,"¢ RclL'rrcd to I~,('('. ' ('~dlicr ('romP,' I'kmnin~ ('ommissi~m - minutes t'or .lanuarv 29. l:cbruarv 5. 19o8 am.l agcncla for March 5. lU~,~,X. RclL'rrcd t(~ I?,('('. (.'~mntv (h~x'crm~cnt Productivity ('ommittcc - miHutcs Ibr l)¢ccmbcr 17. 1907 ~md February 18. 1998. Rcf;.:rrcd Io l~,C'C'. 'l'cchnical Advisory Committee & Citizens Advisory Cormnittcc of thc MP() - minutes Ibr November 19. 1997 and agenda lbr.lanuary 21. 1998. Rcfkrrcd to H('C. ('oilier ('otullv \\";.lief ~.~: W;.L'CICU.';.IlCF Authority - minutes for ()ctol',cr 27. 1997. .lanum-y 26. 1998 and l"chrum-v II. 199g. Roi'erred to P, CC. AGE~DA ITEM MAR 1 7 Igg8 MEMORANDUM 2' RECEIVED TO: Suc Filson Administrative Assistant MAR 2 1998 FROAhj~}J~k JamesL. MitchelI, CIA, CFE, CBA ~0ard of Count.) Director of Finance and Accounting DA TE: February 26, 1998 RE: Board of County Commissioners Disbursements Please find enclosed thc disbursements for thc Board of County ('ommissioners for thc period Fcbru,',ty 16. 1998 through February 20, 1998. In accordance with Florida Statutes, Chapter 136.06(1), we would request that these reports be included as miscellaneous corrospondence to the Board of County Commissioners and made a part of part of Lhe record. If you should have any questions related to this matter, I can be reached at 7744404. Your cooperation in ~s greatly appreciated. /LM\(attachment) (;Op;').., >~ 0~0 0~0 ~~ < ~ m >0~ Z Com ~ Z ~ m mO ~cZ~ ~SxC > m ~ o o z Z >o m Z 0 e.... -o o) Cm3~ ~o~ oOc) ©r- © ---t m C) -r' m Z z C) -r m 0 ~o~ m m m > ~Z ~ o m m 0 m m .,\ ,Ioinl N. lucling of Iht Ihx~rd .f I.cc ('otmly ('.mmi~ion~r~. Ih~ ('ollicr ('oumv I~onrd of ('ommissioners :md Iht Il. N. Army ('orps o1' ILnginccrs %v;l~ held dHs dine wilh Iht Iblloxving persons prcscm: Ftarbara l~crry. £'hnirpcrson .Iohn Norris. Vicc-('h:Hrman Tim I l:lncock Tim ('.nsl;mlinc. nrrived Pamela Mae'Kit AI,tMY (;()l,~l'N ()1" I'~N(;INI'~EI,~S ('ohmcl .Io¢ R. ?.filler John l lall I.Ioyd Pike Ih~h Igarron Richard l~onncr Kcnnclh I)u~cr .laccluclinc (iril]~lh Chairman .',.lamm~g called thc incclin~ to order at 9:05 ami. lie :.lnr~oullced Ilia! since [Iii.,; is a \\'orkshop. no public inpul will bc lakcn. 2. WEI,(;()ME AND INTI,~OI)Ii(TFION,% (._]11HirTll~ln MallllJll~ ',.vclc'(Ullccl alld inIrodtlccd lJlc (_'oilier £'ountv (-'onlmJs.sioncr:-;. ('()llllll]ssioll,gr ('c, nst:.tntinc arri',.'cd during thc ('orps' i~rcscntalion. ('hnirmml .\'lanning i~ltro,,.lL~CCd Ill,,: I.co C'OUnl'V ('O;llnlissi~,ners [llld Ih,,2 representatives of thc C'orps. C'ohmcl .loc Nlillcr introduced his Ntafl'mcml',crs: I)r..JtHm llal'l. ('hicl'ol'lhc R,,.'~ulatorv I)ivision: Attorney I.lc, vd Iqku. ('hicl'('ounscl; N, lr. l~ob lk~rron. [(c,.:'ulatorv l)ivisi.n: Mr. Kenneth i)ut.,e~'r. ('hi~'l'ol'thc F. nvironmcntal ('o,,;'clinati,n .";cction: M:~..laccluciinc (;riliith. ('l~icl'of I'ul'Hic .,\Fl'airs; Nls. II~'c'~ncla C;h~Hil'~,ur. Special Assistant: and I'rom thc Dimming and mltt~gcmcl~l consultants. Mr. Tim Vcathcr nmi Mr. I)ale I]roxvn. (q)N1MISSI()NliI~ ('()NN'I'/XNTINI/I!N'FI~RI!I)TI Il! MIiI'71'IN(i l~'J' 'J'J lis TIMIi. 3. I'I/I']SI']NT.,\'I'JON I1¥ 'FILE AI,tMY (;OIIP,S ¢)F ICN¢;INEEIIS 4. I)I':FINi,: I,.,\NI) ..\1( I.~ /\.",; ()I: ('()N(;I,:IIN I)I,%('U,',;.',;I()N ()F ANY I/EM.,\ININ(; OI~I.:.N'I'I()N.N ..\II()IIT TIlE I,l.:(;..\l, ,\l,l'l'll()l/l'FY ()F 'I'IIE AI{NIY (;¢)1~1'S {)F EN{;INF. EI,~S '1'0 I'I~.¢)('EI~:I) \VI'Fil 'FILE EI~ 6. I)I,%(;I!SNION ()N 'I'YI'I,] {)F I)A'I',,\ ,ANI) l"ll,]l,I) I)..\T.,\ 'FO lie U,KEI) IN 'Flll.] EIN I)iS(;IISNION ()1,' I',\I/AMI.71'EI~,S C0pie:~ 1'o: Colonel Joc Miller thanked thc t',',o C'()untics for ullo',,.'inu, this Ibrum toda,,'.. (.'oh)r~cl Miller i:'Hbrmcd ;ill ih;it tit.' is a f~rmcr resident t)l' I:l(u'id;I. alic'nding I'ilcmcnli~rv .'lilt] .Itmi()r l li~h .'qcht)ols ill l)ade k'otI)ll',.', l'hc Ikdlov¢in,..:, slides v¢crc shov. n. :vith cilhur ('oloncl Nlillcr t~r I)r. I lnll claboratiI:~: (wi the sub col Ill;lilt?r: thc It.'Xl Oi !he slides i¢ included because it is ._ucrmim¢ to tilt' discussitm: NOrris ,-~ // Hancock Const8nt ~ne~' ~ M~c 'K te ,, . ................................................... I)R:\F F MINU'I I:,~ ()1,' O_ I lO~J ............................................. ~ ....... ~/.~.~__._ 2 BO()I< . 19g?R . H()('.(' - ....................................................................................... ....... PA(~I!~ ............................ ~6 I'RI.2':.IiNTATI()N T() .I()INT MliliTIN(; ()F TI IF. I,Eli ANI) ('()I,I.IF, R ('()l W'I'Y U()XI,'XllS,";I()NI!RS. WIiDNI.:SDAY. I.'I!IH~I ;ARY II. 1998 ('uluncl Joe R. Miller. ('ommandcrq)istricl I(nginccr..h~cksonville I)islrict t ~. S. ,,\rmy ('~rps ol' I':nLzinccrs I~;RII'.'I:I N(; A(iI!NI)/\ Review hi' Auth~ritics;/l~ricl' I listnry ¢l'('m'ps l(cgulamry I'mgrmn l~lS Process. Key I)atcs and Schedule I{xpcctcd l~c~ulls/l'r()duct I~IS (;rmmd Rules ('nips' I'crspccdvc m~ ElS 1.cssons I.carncd Thus Far l,ucal l'crspcclixcs (m ElS ~ HI11111[lrv S()I ITl I'VI.:.',;T FI.()RII)/\ TI II';A'I'IiR ()1: ()PI(RATI()N,q; an I!dimrial and ()pinion cart(mn tilled: \Vii ,";I I:\ I.I. WA I)1'; TI ltl( .H ]( iii '1 I I1.";, l ( )( il'A1 I';I,"; l'l/()(;l'.',',;S; I~ Momh Time l"ramc hlx'ilu ('orlllll,2111s or1 Scope - 2 IllOr11]1.',; Idcnlil'y l~'.'alualion I:;tcmrs: Collect and Review Data. 3 months I)cx-clcp Range ol'Ahcrnativcs: Evahmtc Each Alternative - 3 nmnlhs Synthcsizc/l~dit and Publish Draft ElS: Invite (,omrncnts - 3 re(ruths I'rcparc I'rcliminarv Rcvisimts to [);fla. Ahcrnativcs or I(vahmtkm - 3 months S)'nzhcsis'l(dit. Publish I:inzfl ElS: invite comments - 3 nmnlhs Prcp;~rc Record ¢1' I)ccisMn - I mm~d~ KEY PAST .,\NI) I'RI!SliNT .Innu;ir;' 12 Fcl~ru;ir'v 4 ;tim 5 J:ul'q'Llar\' () Fchru;~rv I1 I"chruarv 2(I ,March 18 ( )clol~cr. I ()qg April. 199() May. 1999 .hlll,E. I N()'I'I('I! ()F IN'I'I.:NT I'Ill1I,ISI II.,'l) IN I:lil)l.;l~,..\l. RI((;I>;TI.:I{ I'lrIll.l(' N()TI( SI.]I.~ 11('.4 I )1: .\ll(l!'l'lX( iS VvTI'I I (.'()1 LN T",,' ('().x I X IIS.',41( )XtiRS ANt) ,X I1(,\ llll.]R.'q / )1.' ('()MMI INI'I'Y 1'I 'Ill.l(' .XlI!I.]'I'IN(iS I II.]1.I) II}:()l} ,,\5,1 ..\NJ) 5:3(l PXI. I.:STt!I((). FI. .l( )INT ~11!1.:'1 IN( i. ('()1 :XIY ('()M,", I1S.',;I( )N liR.',;. Ill INIT..\ .',;I'R I N(i.',;. FI. (RI!(' ('I'R~ I)IC,\I)I,INI.i I:()R St IIIMISSI()N ()F £'()M.XII.,'N'I'S ( )N EIS S('()I'I( ('()RI'S' I'RI.:,'41.:NT,.VI'I()N ()F I-,'IS .',i('()I'!N( i AT S\\'ltl .XlI!I~'I'IN(i I)I~..\FT EIS N(iTI('Ii ()F/\VAII..,\IHI.I'I Y IN FliI)lil~,..\[. I),l!(ilS I'I.:R I'1 ;BI.l(' Xll.:l.i'l'lN(i ()R III..'ARIN(i FIN..\I. I.:IS Nil..\ IN I:I!I)I~R..,\L Rli(iIS'I'tLR I'RI!I'ARli Ill.:('()RI) Ill: I)I!CISION/T.,\Kh ..\I'I'R()i'RI..VI'I! AC'TI()N I!XI"I(("I'I']) END Ill']SI II.'I"I'RI)I)I '('T ................................................... I)R,.\I'I'5,11NI:II.:S()I I'" IgSi ...................... I~;()(1K' [~qTR'll~l( (- ............................................................................... I 6C~ 2 ....... I':\( il .................................... g" ~1 'P, I'R( ~1)1 :('l \\'11.I~ R I.iI'P,I(SiI(NT '1 I I1( Rligl ,I. I'~ ()1: TI I1.i ('()I~,I'S' I~ I*i.';1'( )NXlHII.I I'Y I~ } .,\1 )l)kl L'-;~ IS.~l :I(~ .,\NI) P,I.;QI ~IRI(.~II(N I'.'-; (il.' NIH'.,\. ('\V.,\. ;\NI) I,;S..\. \VI:. \V'II.I, I I.,\VI.: A Nil i('11 I~11'1~,()\'1(I)I)AT.,\ II,,\NI! I:R()~I \V1 I1('11 'I'() XI.,\ KI.; ItI.:'I'TIiP, P,l;.(il q.AT(II~,y IqiR,MIT I)I!('I.',;I()NS - ('RITI('AI, I Il(ill VAI.I il( WIi'I'I,,.\NI).',; I\VIIliRli TI II(RI! I.";, .,\ I:I.:I)I(IL,\t. IN'l'l(l(l!,q'l') V,'II.I. IIl.i I)I'iI"INI.;I)/I)I.iI.INI(..\Tlil). TI I( t.~l.; TI I,.VI' ,,\RI! NIIT...\VIt.I. ,\1..',;()II1! II)I.'.NTIHIil). \VI.; ,.\kl; I tl)l'l(l:l ;I, Tlll.] t(NI) I'l,t{)l)l i("1 \VII.I. RI.L',;I ?I.T IN Till! IXSI,,,,,; ( I: {)1.' ..\ { iILNI.iIL,\I . Wit ..\RH ('{)5I\111'11.2I) '1'( ) ('{ IMI'I .I.71'IN(i I'1 lis I'P,I I('l.:XN IN 1 8 Nil IN'lq tl'l.,S' X¢~ll. /IlL ID/~III¢~II..l UtIVT'IIX,X'I/tIIIV I~ 7111.; I,UI'I,I,'UI,'YI;II'II¢V ITIII','I. IVI., I.~' IliA' I'IUI( I,'1.,'(~I 'IRI, I~ I~ I'I~1,'1',11~I-; 71ti: IXXI '.lYf 't-, rH" I f;I','XI';IL,II, I'I','ILUI'I ,,IYI] I,X' V~/'I' IItTf ~I TIII~ Ix ,U[~.VTII ~ 1,1' I I. IX I'l?t ~ 'I..X.k'~ ILS...\R Xl'f (7 ~P,l'g t)l. I(N( iINI(I.:I',S .,\1 ~1'11()I~,I'I'II.:S ~I!( "1'1( )N I I~ ( )1,' '1'I Iii I~t I VI!R.N ,,\XI ) I I,,\I~,II()R.',; .,\("I' .Xli( "1'I( ),N 4O4 ( )1: TI I1.: ('1 .I.:AN W,,Vl'lil,t ,,\('T .'-;I(( '1'I( IX I I'~ ( )1: TI I1.: MARINI,: I'l~,()'l'li("l'll)N. III!.";I.:A R('I I ,,\NI ) .%,\:',:~ 'TI II '~'( )1 ' I I.\VI \l)r)l I I( ~N.\I. Q :1); I'1( iN:.-; [ )1,~ Xl-I.:l) AI)I)I I'IIIN.,\I. IXlq )R.'q..\ I I( )X. I'1 IL\SI \IR I I¢~'flll'lKI I'~1 I("iI~XL'II II IIIXlI,~I/'I. I'X.\I'Ii. )1'111'I III:('~II~X~,i I.. I'll 1'~o11.';~-)7(,1 II1~,11'iI'' I IIX'I'I ]l,~'f ()1" I'S. .\R,~l'f ('()RI'N ()I" I':N(ilNI':I.:R.X I~,l!(il II,.,VI'I )R'y I'IU)(iP,..\Xl 1767 I :X ( '( )NXTiTi ri'l( iN. l~, t.X il :i,,,Vi.i( (.()S IM i!l~,(.l,: i W:T\Vi(i(X S i..,Vi.i!.X I.":~i'/IIt\'I!I/~,,\NI)IIAI/II(IICX.,\('I'..Xl.,'('TIi)N II1,,\11'1'I1()1~.I1"~' 1~)2n .'VI'T¢ )1~ X I':'f ( il':Xl!lL.\l.. ( )X I,'f X,,\ \,'l(i,,Vl'l( iN I.'[ )i~ ?;i!(. i'll ~X I')~.'; I'(YI()\I,,\(' RIVI,:P, \VIl,.\ld:, .,\I.2-;TIII:.TI('.'-; ,,',NI) AI,I'I.:IiX.,VIIVI.:.',; :41((' I'I~')N' III I)I':('IglI/N. Xl :PRI.:XlI! ('()IIICI' .,\l-'l,'lli.Xl[il) I'~(,~ ()('I':('IIII(I:('()I:NXI':I.()I'INI(kN'.(',,\NI)I(N'Y.Xi.:('Tit)5; I~)I't.:IL',IITII..\.XI.:I) ( )X ('( ~:x'( 'I.,I~NN I.( )l,t l.'lXi I ,,\Xl) \Vll,I)I,II.'I.: 1'~[,7 Z,\III.:I. V. I'.\HIL ('()I,~I'S I)l.:Xl.\l. IL.\XI!I) ()X I:1.',;tl .,\:,'1) \VIl.I)l.lt:li ('I)X('I.RXS. I1()('..\ ('l.:l(iA II..\Y. 1:I.. ?II I ('IR('I ql' ('~'I'R I' I'I'111(I I); XI'iIL.\I~,NI'f 1)()1 XI()I '. RI; I'I.:I~,.XlIT l'~,q X..\ I'I()XAI. I':X\'II~,()NXlI.:N'I..\I. I'()I.I('Y ,.\("I'(N'I(I'..\~ 1~)?~) I (~ II574.~1.:('I'1()N' 13 I'I.RXlIT I'I~,()(ilL.\N11XII'I..VI'I.iI).\S l~tl.:l:l'Xl! ..\('I' I'I.:NXlI I' l'll()( i I~,.,\.X I l';72 1.1.1). V,'I'P,. I'fll,l,l'l'l()X ('()X'l'l,t()l..'\('I'(I"\VI'('.,\k.'-;F("II(IX 4114 I'P, II(ifL4M IFI.\III.IXlIF:I) II1~11.:1.' Ills 1()1~',' ()1. I:.X. .,\I~,NIY ('()1.~1,:-; ()1.' I':N(ilNlil.:P,.',; P,l((il q..',, l'()l('f I'I~()(ilC.\NI (( '( )N'I'I Xl NNI)('V.('..\I,I.()\\,.\'C('()i'R'i ()NI)I':R.~.II'RI.Xl)I('II()NI.:Xi,.\NI)i(i);F1RSi. I'l.'l~Xll I IS.ql q(l) IN l'IXl.l.l..\X ('1 Y. FI. I~J77 ('l.t(..\X \\'.,\1'1(14 ..\('l (('\V..\iiI:\VI'('A 141(N,.\.klI(III..\MI(NI).NIItN'iS I.'{)1~, .\(iRI('I 'I.TI '1~,1( I(XI.:NII"I'I¢)XX. (iI(XI(P,..\I. I'I(P, MI I'S. HR()..\I) (iI{()(;P,.,\I'I I1(' .Il 'RISI)I(' I'll)N: FIP,,'4 I' N,.VI'I()N\VII)I( I'I!RMI'I'S lU,%' 141':..\(iAX ..\I).XlIN. .\l"l:ll~Xll(I) I '~,x(, Iq,q,x III ~:-;I I ..\I)NIIN. (q)XlXll I'NIILNT '1'() I'R()TI.:k'T I':N\.'IR(,XNII(N I' - ,N,) NI:I' I,( )NS ( i(),,\l, ,XI().,\~ WITII 1.:1',\ ()X (ili()(;I.L,\I'III('.IIII~,I,ql)I('TI()N. ,.\(iI(II,'I:I.TIUL,\I. I!XI!.XlI"I'I()XS .,\NI) I':.",'F()l~,('li~ II..'NT ................................................... IIRAI-I' ,".11 NI ] I I(N ()1.' o21 I'-ISJ .............................................................. Bt)()K - Im)7R. B().('.('. ................................. . ....... I'Alil... * .............................................................................. I',~'?0 NIf)A WI'I'll I!1'/\ ()N MI'I 1¢;,,\ I'I()N RI!QtJII~,I']NII~NTS f)F ,NI'X"I'I()N 404 (bkl) ( ;I ili')lil.lNI,k'.; IOO2 III l,'qll Al)MIN. WI('I'I.ANI),q Iq.ANN - \VIiTI.ANI)S/\NI) I(Fl.'l(.'ll!N("f ~)1: PR()(;RAM 1')~3 ('I.IN'I'()N' Al)MIN. \\'I.YI'I..,\NI)N INl'l'lATIVl.i,'-.;, IN('RI(,,\NI! I'l~()'l'l(UTl()N ,.\NI) I(l:l:l('ll(N('y I(R( ',,\VA'I l~ )N A NI ) ['II.IN( Lq I'lU ).Ix ~404 ) \ICL,\ ,,\5,1(YNt} ('{ll{l'S. Iq'.,\. XC'.'q ,,\NI) I"\VS (>N I)I':I,INI';A'I I{)N 1)I" \VI'.'I ElS "(;14()t iNI) Rt il.l!.q" I ;."il( £'()t iN'l'llSq' (*(~,X. ll,l{l(I II(N."41 \'1( I'I.:\NS .,\.'..; It:\SI!: I.()('AI. AND .XT,.\TI! I'RliFI(14RI!D AI.'I'I(I~,N,,\'] I\'l(S \VE \VII.I, M.,\KI! MAXI.M1 'M l '5;1( f~l: I!XISTIN(} I4l';l'Ol{'l'.q. S'I'I q)ll(S. I!TC. ( iR( ~l 'I'X \\'E ,.\ R Ii \\'{ >R K IN( ~ \\'111 l: S{ )1 ~'I'11\\'I.iS']' FI.()I~,II)..\ 15;.ql 'l(S (iR()[ Ip {S\VI(i} {( ;( )V'.'q ( '.x.l.'q N } A(iI(NCY ()N BAY XI,,kN..\t}I(MI(NT (ABM) .'\ I.'I'I':ICN..VI'IVI.:N 1)1':\'1:I.{ )I'XII':NT (~R()III~' (AD(il (NII(MIII!I{N YET 'II)Illi II)I!NI'IFIF. D) NEI lTl{Al. AND [INIIl,,\.'ql!l) FA('II.IT..XTIt)N ('()RI'N' IA.il! ,,\NI) ('{)I.I,II!R R.,\I'II) (iRI)\V I'1 I. I.'I)()TI~I>,INT ()1.' 8 SQAII, J'I!R.MITTI!I) IN' PAST I:li\\,' YI,;,.\ILq ,,\Xl) I!XI'I.i("I' I'I.:RMIT RF,()I !I.;.',;TS F()R .;~} :;I L),II. IN NEXT I:I(\V 'fI!.,\R.X RI.:('I IRRIN(i I'I.;R:XI1T RI!VIIi\V I,{ ).X.q ( )1: .XlbVl'l.,\l, I t,,\IIIT.,\T {I';NI).,\N(iI~I~,I~I) ~I'I:'CIt.;,X ) ('11/\N'(il:,.'-; IN \\'ATI(I~, I:1,( )\V AND QIJAI,I'I'Y AI'I'R()I'RIATI! \VI,YI'I,,,\NI) ~IITI(i,,VI'I()N 1.~ IN('IU:MI.iN'T..\ . Iq!R?,IIT IIY I'IiRY. IIT RI!VII.,'\V {)N 'l'llE.~;li ISS! !lis ,,\I)I.]QI ',,VI'I:,I,Y ,,\l)l)l,tli.$.',;IN'(i ('1 [~IIII,A'I'IVI! ANI) SI.X'¢)NI).,XI~,y IX 'ACI'.S" I ',Nl()l '1! I.INK ( )1: ('()I~1'5 I{1~( il 'I...VI'( )R 'f I(IS I'I~,()CI!.',;S ,,\,X,'l) ('()1 'X'I'Y ('( k\ II'RI';I lliXXl Vi( l'l..,\XX )1 i'I'('(L',II,; I.q .,\N l']l.X..,\NI),X.l(/l{l! X I I,I;.,\N , NI'.'I)/I'RI.;I)It'T..\III,I! I'I(I,t,XlI'I"I'IN(i I q{ ( )(.'l.2-;,'.q I I'( ).X,'q I IIl.'f I'crnlill m,,,2 ,,\cli~ ilv 7.748 'l'tmll 85.3(',5 24.633 ",, 5;..\.1 q,,.,, '; I" ,, ll"l.()l' 7.676 1.7 % 5;..\.1 1.1",, 5')",. \VI IAT TI Iii ('(/RI'S (11" liN( ilNl(l!l~tS I I,.\.X ×I';\V ,,\II~,I,(}RT TI!RMIN,,\I. AND T,,\XI\VAYS I)() NOT RI'R)IilRI-: AN INI)I';I'IiNI)IiNT ElS I)I'iR,XlI'I'."; ..\RI! ('()N'I'INI rlN(i '1'¢) Bli I)IU )('I:.SSI..'D N() 111 'll.l)IN(i NI()I{,,VI'()I{II :~I liXlS'I'5 NIA.I()I4 IX.ql :l(S '111I 'X I"AI{: I)R..l~ )1 IN I I.,\1,1,. ('1 II1!1'. RI';(il 'I...VI'( )R 5' ................................................... I)R.,\I'I MINI'II ~()1:11211t)14.1 ............................................................. 2. ....... l',A( ;1 .................................................................................................................... I'1 '1~1.I(' NIl.ii{TIN( <)\'liR 2(10 I'.,\I~,'I'I('II'.,\NT.N '111,,\NK Y()I L 1,1{1{ ('()lINTY I.IllR.,\l~,y .";Y,";TI.:NI 4(1 .NI'I{.,\KIiR.% IN ~I()I~,NIN'(;. 2(~ ,NI'I{,,\KI!R.N IN ('()~ I ~ I I{N"l',',,; TI I()l ~( ;I ITFI ~1...\NI ) ( )'v'l.:l~, \\'I II!I,~IIN'(;I .Y gl ~1'I'( )1~,'1'I \'I.~ ( )1: PI~,( )('l(.g:-; IL,\I~,'I'I('IIL.~,NT,$ III I.$1NI'i,$.'41.IKli ..\,N'I) ~,\'l'il.I,-l'l'~l'iP,,\l~,lil) (~().,\1. ()F PI iI31.1(.' ,~llil':'l'lN(~ ( ;I{NI:.I~,.,\I. ( ;I!( )( ;R:\ 1'I I1(' IA.gl 'III.l(' ~II{1{ I'IN( ;.% - (;I{NI{I~,,'\I. (,'()AINII!N'I'.'-; ('()N('I.;V,N: IN ."4( )1 ~'1'I l~,\'li.gT I"1 .( )V, II),\ 1½1'i(.'()~.IIN(; ,,\N( )TI II.:R I.i,.\N'[ ('(),,\.";'1 '.' l tl{N Ii I: I T.'-; ,,\ N I ) ('()N'I',~ ,,\.',; N( )('I..\'1'1!1 ) \VI'FI I ( iF,( )\VTI I ()ILSI{I~,',,',,\'I'I()NN ()N I'l~,()(.'l.:.g,gli.'-; F()I~, I'I,ANNIN(;. DI'~VI.iI.()I',',.N!X'T ..\I'PR()\',.\I. .,\NI) I~N'FI.I II!N~(.'l.i I~Y ,gl'l~(_'l,,\I, IN' I XII'I.Ii~,II.iN'I',,VI'I()N ()1: (.'I ;RRI!NT t lll)I)I!N I'1 tl~,l.l(' .\11.:1{ IIIN(;.~, - ('()NI~,II{NTS ()N (;I!()R(;I{APIII£' 1.,,\1~(;1.: ARIi/\ ()R .";~I,,\1,I, ,,\RI.i.,\'.~ IL,\I,,,\ N.'('I.: ,,\I{RI,,\I, I.:XTI!,,NT T() I)I-."I'AII, ()F .,\I'PR()I'RI,,VI'I! ,,\RI-L,\ F()R I~,l!(;I!l,.,\TOl~Y I{I"FI{('T.'-; ()N l{.'-;'l'I .r,.\ P,Y. NI!AI,L%I I()RI.: ANI) (;UI,F ~,VA'I'EI~.% i~,Y I~,l IN()FI: FI~,(),\.i \¥'A'I'I':I,LS I Ilil),g F( )','l i.";I.ii)()N I"..";'1'I!1~,()IL,\Y V',',,\'I'IiR.$111':1). II!JT MANY ,,\I)I)I'.'D: .,\1.1. ()1: 1.I{1! I'( )R'I'I()N ()F I II!NI)RY r,'()l ;NTY I)R,,\ININ'(; T() ('()I.I,II!R ('()l :,N'I'Y I.,.\KI{ 'l'l~,.,\l:lr()l.~l) . ('.\.',.IP Kl!,,\lg .$'I'R.,\ NI) - I:AK,,\I I;\'1'('I I1!1! - I'1 f()l i.g..\,",,'l ) (.'..\ I.( )( ).";..\ I I..\'1 ('t I1{1! I~1 \'I!R I'1 !l~l.l(' ~ll{l-:'l'l,N( ;.% - I.ggl ~l{,g \v..\'l'l il,~ I{I.'I.'1.i(' 1','4 ()3,' ~,V..\TI.iI~ gl il'PI.Y I.'F,( ~,~1 I.( ).',;N ()1.' \\'.,\'fl.iR (,)1L.\I.I'I Y I.( ),'4.'4 ( )F \VI!TI ...\.N'I).',; I I,.\I,NT,.\T I.( ).'-;.'-; .,\NI) I:R,,\( i,~II.iXT,,\'I'I()N' I:I.()()I)I,',,'(; .l()l~N .,\NI) I!(.'()N(),",ll(.' I)I'~\'I!I.()I'~II!,N;T I.i('()N().~II(' I)1VI{R.'-;ITY I~11',,\(' 1'.'4 ()N I)RINKIN(; \V,.VI'Iil~, Ii(.'( )-T( )1 I'R( )I'1.i1,~ I'Y I!NI)..\N(iI{RI.iI) ,,\NI) TI IRI!..\ FI!NIH) X I1'1'I(;..\'1'1( ),N I't '1~,1,1(' ,",II{I!TIN( ;.% - ('(),~l~II!,N'l .g ( )N PR()('I.i.NS ................................................... I)1~,.~1' 1 ~11,',;i ,'11.~; ( ~1' ~211 ~,~,~7 1 C, 2 I10()~ · Iq~71,[. H.¢).C.('.- .............................................................................................................. .'. ....... L L',,;I.; BEST AVAII,AI].I,I! INF()RMATION P 1'3.~ P, RI.;VIEW (;()()1) S£'II~NCE I,()CAI. PARTICII~^TI()N I'11A.";IN(i 18 M()NTII -36 M()NTIIS ('()N N IX"I'I()N/I)t H'I.ICATI()N \VITI I I~,I':.'<,TI II)Y ('AI.()()SAI I:VI'('I IEE WRI)A CP, ITIC/\[, I'P,()JI'X'T,'¢, SF, I,Ii£'TI()N ()1: AI,TIiI~,N/VI'IVI! I)l!Vli () 'MENT (;R(){II' (AD(i) I'IIBIAC MF.I!IN(iS \VIWI"I'F.N ('()MMI'~N'FS ()N TI IE S('()PI.; ()F TI IE ElS ACCI'~PTF, I) IJNI'II. I:I!IW, IJARY 20. 1998 I)ISTP, ICT I:.N(ilN EI'~I~, .IA('KSONVILIJ! I)IS'I'P, ICT l i.N..,\P, MY C()RPS ()F I'iN(ilNliERS ILO. B()X 4970 .I/\(.'KS(}NVII,I.I.2. FI.()I,',II)..\ 32232-0019 F{)R INF()I,tM.,VI'I()N: C(}NTACT I~,()B I~;:\P,P,()N (904) 232-2203 KEY ISSUES \\,'ATI!P, QUAIJ'I'Y AND ()UAN'ITI"~' IiC()NOMIC I)I!VF. LOIhM[!NT MITI(b\TI()N I I,,\ I H'I'AT/I'.'N I)A N(} Iii;, I.:D SPI!CII!S \\"I'71'I./\ N I)S .'41';I,I';('TI(I) I.()('AI, I'IiRSI'I:.('TIV'I!S "C()RPS I'P,I~St~NCI'; IS St rSPI!CT" "WI':'RE I)()IN(} FINE - ('()RI'S N()T "\Vii I)()N'T TP,[ !N[' Y()U - Y()I~ RI'.'I'I~,I~SENT TI IE I IEAVY I IANI) ()F FI!DI~R:\L (;()VI!P, NMI.~NT" *'Y()I ;R FI!I)I!IL,\I, I'I.W, MITTIN(i I'I~,()('I!SS IS T()()SI,OW. '1'()()C()STI.Y ANI) INI!FFI('II!NT" "('()P,I'S IS TR'flN(; T() ST()I' ()R I.INIIT (;I{()\VTII/\NI) I)IiVF. I.()I~MI!NT'' "('( )RI'S IS TI I1': I..,\ST (;RI!,,VI' I I()I'E F()R I!NVIRONMI!NTAI. (;R()I IPS" "('()RI'S l."; TI II! "I),,\R'I*I I \",,\I)I!R" ()F TI II',' I)I-~VI!I,OI'MI:,NT INTliRI'~ST.'q" "I';NVIP,( )NMI.~NI'AI, (iR()I q'.'q ('..\N'T lb\SS TI IEIR AGI!NI):\ ,VI' TI II.; I1AI.I.()T P, OX .'-;() 1'1 II!Y .,\ P,I.i TRYIN(i T() (ii.71' Y()II '1'() FURTI IEP, TI IEIR .,\(;I!NDA" "Y( )l r'l',l! I,IKE (i()IN(i '1'()TI 11! I)I!NTIST - IT I IUP, TS INITIAI,I,Y. IIIJT IS (i()()l) I:()P, I~S IN TI Iii I,()N(i "WI IY N()\V'.'" 1,1!1.; ANI) (.'()I.I,II!R C()[INTIICS INV(H,\'ILMI.~NT TI IE C()P,I,S C()NTINUI!S TO RI!QI. !EST TI IE INV()I,VI.~MENI' ()1: TI IE Cf)! ~'N'I'IES ... :\S \VI'71.[. AS IiVI'.'RY()Nli [':I.SL:. Till! C()tINTY ('()MMISSI()NI'.'RS' I)I!CISION COMES I)()WN. AS S'[',,VI'I~I) BY ()NE ()F Y()[I I.AST WEEK. T(): "IF \\'Ii/\RI! C()MF()I{'I'AIII.I.~ \VITII '['11E C()RPS (i()IN(; ()N WITI l( )UT US. TI IEN TI I1'~ C()RPS SI IOI Il,l) l)() S() AI,ONF.. IF N()T. TI IEN WI'~ I~,EAI,LY ()ti(il IT TO (iF/l' INVOI,VI'~I) AT ..\ I,F.\"I'~I, ()F PARTI('IPATI()N TI IAT I)I!PENDS ON OUR I.EVF. I, OF C()MFOIFI'." ................................................... I)RAFT MINU I'I!S ()F (}21198J .............................................................. 1.6Cr 2 It()()K - V)~7R - I~ ().('.('. ..................................................................................................................... ....... ILS. ARMY C'()RI'S ()l: t.:N(HNliI(RS l{li(H II,A'I'¢)RY I'IUI(;RAM I'IIIH.I(' ('()MMI'IMIiNT I't I1~;I,1(' SI'~RVI('I! IS A 1'I IBI,I(' 11',I tS'l' ... ANI) WI.i MI iS'I' EARN Y()I !R TRtJST. TO KI!I.:I' Ye WI~ Nil INT ('¢)NI I:( )I,I.()WIN(} PIUN('I PI.liS: I'R()FIiSSI()NAI,ISM KN()WI.ED(iliAIH,I.; A('C¢)I !NTAIIII.I'I'Y I:AI Ii N I(SS R I'L,\ Sf )NAIl[ .I.~ N F.S S I I()NliS'I'Y TIM F.[.IN['~SS R I.;SI'I.X 'T SUMMARY I':: I!FFI('II';NCY AND I'X.'()N()MY ()1: I'~FFORT I :INI:{)RMA'I'I()N NI'iI';I)I';I)Ti) I'R()V'II)I'; C()NSIS'I'F. NCY. CI';RTAINTY ANI) ('I,.,\ RITY S: SI(RVI('I( AND SI'Iii!I) BY TI I1.: ('()RI'S: FOR ITS C'UST()*,II!I~,S Tills F. IS IS NOT/\It()tJT SI:.I~,\.'IN(i ()NF. INTF. RF. ST (;Rf)tJI' ()R ,'\N()'~ I II;R ... IT IS ABf)IIT Al.l, ()F I;S IN (i(~\"IiRNMI';NT P,I':TTER SF, RVIN(; AI,I. ()F TI Iii I'l':()l'l.l:. ()1: TI Iii [1NI'H(1) S'I'ATI!S ()1: AMt'.'I~,ICA. Till': S'I'ATI! ()F FI.()RIDA AND l.l!l'~ AND (7()I.I.II!R C()IJNTIF. S ()1 II':STI()NS ANI) ANSWI-;RS As par! o1' his corem(ms. ('oloncl Miller holed that ('.loncl Terry Rice (his predecessor) was in thc audience. Regarding prior studies. Cohmcl Miller advised that his Staff is working wilh thc South Florida Water Management District. Rcsp,nding to Commissioner Cmaslantinc's question on legal authority. Cohmcl Miller listed thc Clean Water Act. the I~ndangcrcd Species Act. thc N I(PA process itscll2 protection of' wetland:' arc .ndcr his Federal Authorities: as a result, he has to lake appropriate action to avoid or to mitigate impacts thc tJnitcd States. Attorney Pike clarified that thc Clean Water Act is thc dcm' authorization Ibr thc dcposil ol'drcdgc or fill materials in thc waters orlhc United Sial(s: that's 33[ ;SCI 344: Ibr thc (',loncl t~ exercise his legal responsibility, hc has lo have environmental inlbrmatioa at his disposal. In dcscriblng thc nccd fi,' thc I(IN. Attorney Pike slated "we truly don't undcrsland, although x~c may understand it on an individual basis, wc don't have an understanding o1' what this ctmmlative development is doing to thc col~lmtmity and how tl~c interaction o1' thc impacts on Ih( water is afl,cling thc cm'ironmcnt: Iht deposit of Iill material is xxhat gets us inv, lvcd in Ibc inquiry ...." Responding to (',mmisshmcr ('~W's question ol'cosls to Ibc County Ibr thc I(1S...Mtorncy Pike advised that there w,uld bc no cost ofl~cr than parlicipalion ol'('otmlv discussed lhrt*u~hout this qucslion ~md :mswcr pcri,d. ('ommissioncrs discussed Ih( pros and cons of panicipming in thc M()[I (Nlcnmrandum of t Jnclcrslandin~): il was nt~tcd that several clements o1' thc Mi)I) haxc bccn incorporated in thc Corps' approach. Rc~brring to xxhclhcr or not thc Bo'drds shotfld sign thc comlbrtablc xx ith any level tffparlicipalion fr,m Ih( ('ommissioncrs and th(ir Albion's tl,CStion ol'liability. Altorncy Pike slated that Ih( ('orps docsn'l have Ibc ability to indcmnit3' local gox'crnmcnts. I{csp,nding m ('-mmissioncr Norris' inquiry regarding thc composilion ol'thc ,Al)ii. Dr. l lall staled: People nccd to cot'nc with a commitment to cio it: il will take time They nccd to come with st,nc cmpowcrnlcnt from Ih( group they represent They nccd Io inakc sure Ihat thc constitution of thc group and thc operation of thc group is as Ihir and neutral and unbiased as they can possibly bc Cohmcl Miller and I)r. I lall committed to Ih( Counties having dedicated scats on thc AD(i: it :,,'ill be equitable bct:','ccr~ thc tw.fl ('c, unlics. Discussing thc cc, mmitmcms ma,.Ic today. Colonel Miller ;assured thc Commissioners that hc ,.,.'ill bc watching this proc(ss very ch,scly: it will have his pcrsc, n;.d attention to sc,.: th:l! thc cmnmitrncnts he has made arc tbJlowcd. '[']lrotlghotll tile discussic, n the COliC(fils ol'cach CollllllJssiollcr were ;?ddresscd. 8. FINAl. i,tESI'ONSES ................................................... I)RAFT MINll'I'I(S ()F 1121 IqSl .............................................................. II(l(~K IGC)71', ICl .. ................. · . I (' (' ' ........................................................................................................ I'A(ik: q2 ("hair111;.lll M;.tnninL. L requested a lllOliol! OI'CtHIS'.2tlSLIS (H! ',,~,llich ',v;t? thc ~roup ~',anls to iIIO',,'c v, ith ruspect lo thc signing of thc ~ 1( )l.: ['i rsE then thc ..\1 )( ;. ('t)111111issioncr I iancock nlovcd "lhal we consider thc appointment of imlividunl liaison from u;tch I:hmrd to thc Army (',~rps t,l' I!n:.,.iI~curs to work in p;Irtncrship through thc sc,~pin~ and completion o1' lhis study It, hdl'~ dh-cot Ibc prucuss in a m:mncr thai i~ reasonable and fair tu our S1;1[C111Ctll lhal our Ih~ard. I.cc ('ounly can Iblto~v ~uil iflhcy would like. but our Board ~tlpporl~ ;II Ihi~ point, thc cfi~,'l of cooperation Io develop thc ILl S c~cn tJlougil we're IlOl signing Oll 3s ti signalor". Thc ilIllCIldlllClll WiIS accepted. Judah, ('ommissitmcr 1 lancuck clarilicd. "thc motion indicates that we are not going to sign lilt hl()tJ ;ti Ibis point ;md appoint a liaison: il docs Dot oulright reject Ibc Xl()t: ....... my motion remains m'~solutclv', silent on Iht I:olh~wing further tJisctlssiiH1 ol1 Ibc M( )J I, the illt~liOll ~kilS calJud alltl carried. Commissioner J {allCJ~ck, "[I1 iht JlllClll 1/3 rcpresunl;ltim~ lo 1{IC lolllJ mmlhcr tIJ'iIJ3[)I)}IIIIllClIIS (Ill IJIU /~l)(}". seconded hv ('ommissi(mcr ('oy. called and carried. ('hairnlai~ Manning ;icl ourncd Iht meeting ai I l:t)3 a.m. ,,VI'TI !S'I': (.71 I,,~, I), I,l E (iR I.iEN. l)cpuly ('lcrk ('h;lirlu.:ul. I.e,,.: County Commission ................................................... I)I*,A FT MINUTI!5; ()l" ()2 1 I g,"lJ .............................................................. DATE: PLACE: TIME: VI. VII. COLLIER COUNTY AIRPORT AUTHORITY AGENDA February 9, 1998 Marco Island Executive Airport, 2003 Mainsail Drive, Conference Room, Naples, FL 1:00 P.M. Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this Airport Authority will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and will need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record will include all testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Call Meeting to Order and Quorum Check Approval of Agenda Approval of Minutes Administrative a. Business Plan Everglades Airpark a. Marketing Video- 8 minute b. 50'h Park Celebration Certificate of Appreciation c. Acceptance of FDOT Grant to Construct Grass Tie Downs Immokalee Regional Airport a. Brokerage Fees-Industrial Park b. Industrial Park Manufacturing Center (Incubator) c. D.C. Air, Inc. Lease d. Acceptance of FDOT Grant to Construct T-hangars e. Acceptance of FDOT Grant for AWOS f. Acceptance of Supplemental Grant for Joint Seal Blast Pad Projects Marco Island Executive Airport a. Decommission N.D.B. b. Avigation Easement - Fiddlers Creek c, Acceptance of Grant to Construct T-hangars d. Film Festival Old Business New Business Adjournment 1GG 2 MEMBEI/S I'i/I,;SI';N'F: ABSENI': STAFI:: I'UIII,IC: AIRP()IIT AIFI'II()IIITY MINI. Il'ES ()F I)ECI:,MIIEll 15, 1997 APPI'IOVEI) 1/12/9/I R. ichard Anderson Steve l'ricc t Icrbcrt North John l)rurv Thomas Palmer I.uc ('arricrc George l~arron..'qr. Michael \Villiams ,loAnnc l,camcr Ncno .I. Spagna Monte l,azarus l';rncst Spinclli 'I'c rc sa 'I'h o m ts s Wayne Chcwning l. MEETING CAIA,EI) T() ()RI)Ell AND QII()RUM CiIECK Meeting called to order at 1:05 p.m. and quorum was present. II...\I'PROVAI, ()F A(;ENI)A Nit. Ih'icc nlovcd to ;.tnlcnd thc ak2cnda as l'oIIows: Add: IV.G. AC-t J-KWIK Marketing Page. VI.C. Work ()rdcr For Scrub .lay l'lan Iml'flemcntation. Vll. ID. Rent-A-Car [,case and VII.E. l tclicoptcr Tour l,casc. Mr. 1tarron.sccondcdlhcmotion. M¢flionpasscdunanimously. Ill..,'~I'PROVAL OF MINUTES Nlr. Ih'icc mox'cd to approve thc minutes ol'()ctobcr 13, 1997. Mr. Barron seconded thc motion. Molion passed unanimously. IV..,\I)MINISTI/ATIV E a. Business l'lan Update- Monte Lazarus/Sieve Price Mr. I.axarus stated tha! Ntcve I'ricc. John l)rury. JoAnnc I,eamcr and myscl[ mci wilh Comnfissioner lhmcock. Commissioner Norris. C'ommissioncr Berry and Commissioner (]onstantinc to go over thc Draft Business Plan and Executive Summary. Thc Board of County Commissioners was very thvorablc and had very good comments. Thc I~[)C also gave good comments. Mr. I)rury will assimilalc comments and bring back to tl~c Board o1' County Comnfissioncrs. b. llrokcraf2e Fees - Michael Williams Mr. \Villiams met wifl': Scott C:m~cron, Cameron Real l£statc to discuss thc possibilities of having a company get paid Io ]case space ill thc lmnlokalcc Industrial Park. Mr. Williams i~ls we should Norris ,' Hancock / / I Constsntlne ~ 2 c(msidcr having a conlrac! wilh a ?,cai I!smtc Company Io markcl Iht Induslri,'fl I)ark and gel il off Iht Mr. I'ricc agrees we ncctl a good commercial Realtor who is exposed lo fl~osc types of people looking Io relocate. Mr. Ih'icc also suggested going through thc RI:I~ process to sec Wile would be interested. Mr. \\"illiams moved for staff to go out for l~,l"P's for a Real Estate Company to be paid a brokerage Ibc for marketing tile Industrial Park and bring the l~,FP's back ltl tile Airport .,\uthoritv Ibr review, klr. Ih'icc seconded thc motion. Motion passed unanimouslv. c. i/,csilzn;~tion Operations Director- Steve Iiocco Mr. l)mrv staled Mr. P, occo has resigned from his position of ()pcrati(ms l)ircclor. 5Ir. Drurv is requesting thc position be eliminated and replaced with a lower level equal lo thc Airpnrt ()pcrations Supervisor position which would save SI 5.0()0. Mr. I,azarus Ibels we should keep position ab(we ()perations Supervisor status but pay al a lower salary N It. l)rurv explained tile salary goes by .job duties. Mr. Drury slated tile job description could he changed above ()potations Supervisor slalus but beh)w current reqt, irements which would save ;.,b~ mt $10.{)0{}. Mr. lku'ron moved Itl keep position but save $10,000.00. Mr. Price seconded lhe motion. Nlolion passed tmanimottslv. ti. Irnil'orm Policy N'II'. J)rurv stated in order lo portray a prt~l'cssionitJ ima,,e to our CLISIOIIlOI'S il is recommended that Ibc At~thorily p"(widc the or,sterner service representatives with a unitbrm or an allowance lhat ti~cx' can usc lo defray thc cost of purchasing prol~ssitmai altire. Mr. IVicc queslitmed whv don't u'e make a dress code vs. paying to tile unifomW? Mr. Price feels other airpt~rls wear business attire withottl purchasing uniforms. Mr. \Villiams moved for a dress code to bc set N,t not pa.,,, lbr unilbrms. Mr. Barren seconded tile melitta. NIotitm passed tmarfirllot~slv. e. l:uel Purchasing Options Mr. l)rury presented an analysis on fucl purchasing options. It is reconm~ended that tile Auth¢~ritv stay with lhe Chevron contract until it expires. L (7.1Lt. Calculations Mr. I)rury is recommending that the l,¢asing l'olicy and all leases and contracts bc amended to reflect a fixed 3% C.I'.I. increase vs. C.P.I. variable calculations. Mr. Williams Feels we should go by file C.P.I. calculation which is easier to.justify to a tenant ifa questions arises about tile increase in rent. Mr. Williams moved not to accept the recommendation. Mr. Price seconded tile motion. Motion passed unanin'~ously. g. AC-U-K~vik Marketinlz Pl'4n Mr. [)fury handed out thc new Ac-u-kwik ad m Ibc Authority members. The Authority members xverc pleased with this ad. V. F, VER(;LAI)ES AIRPARK a. National ParkS0'~' Rededication Mr. l)rury stated tile rededication ceremony hosted about 3,000 people. Thc Authority would like to recognize a job well done by David Blalock tbr organizing such a successful event. VI. IMMOKALEE RE(;IONAL AIRPORT a. I.i.S. Arm)' Permit Mr. I)rury stated tile U.S. Army requested a renewal of their five year permit to utili×c the lmmokalce Regional Airport Ibr another live years. The permit is at no cost to Iht Authority and no revenues are derived From the permit. Mr. Npinclli moved approve Resolution No. 97-37 authorizing the execution ol' said permit. Mr. Williams seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. b. Scrub.lay Plan Nit'. Cartiere briefed the Authority on tile Scrub ,lay Plan which shows how to restore tile scrub .j~ys (burning inexpensive vs. clear cutting at $2,000 per acre). U.S. Fish and Wildlife will issue a permit on 12/27/97. c. Work Order Scrub.lay Plan lmplement:~tion Mr. l')mry recommends thc Authority approve a work order with Dutkesnc41cnry, Inc. in the amount of $12,090.90 tbr prolk'ssional engineering services to implement the Scrub ,lay Habitat Modi fication Plan. 16G 2 Mr. Spinelli moved to approve I~.esolution No. 97-45. Mr. Price seconded tile molion. Motion passed tznanimously. VI I. MARCO ISLAND EXECUTIVE AlII, PORT a. Terminal ilehabilitation Supplement (;rant K, Ir. l)rury recommends lhc Authority accept ,qupplcmcntal (;rant tt2 itl thc amount of $45.000 and authorize stalT to prepare a budget amendment to increase tile project budget from $669.500 to $719,500. Mr. t~arron moved to approve Resolution No. 97-41. Mr. Spinelli seconded the motion. Motion passed u nan i mous[ y. b. Supplemental Work Order Mr. Drury stated that DuFresne-llenry. Inc. has inct,rrcd an additionnl $3.500 in cost associated with permitting, design administration, quality control, shop drawing review and field construction coordination services related to thc Marco Terminal Rchabi[itation project. Mr. Spinclli moved to approve l(csolution No. 97-42. Mr. Price seconded ',he motion. Motion passed unanimously. c. Taxi,var Project Mr. Drurv is recommending a committee be established to work with stalT and engineers on evaluating tile most cost effective approach to accomplishing tile development oF tile taxixvay project. Mr. l.a×arus stated he will consult with Mr. I)rury at a later date on tile subject. d. Rent-A-Car Mr. l)rurv recommends tile Authority approve tile terms and conditions of the Enterprise car rental service agreement. Mr. Npinelli moved to approve [~,csolution No. r )7-4.~. Mr. Barron seconded tile motion. Motion passed t~nnnimously. e. tlelicopterTours Mr. Drurv recommends tile Authority approve the terms and conditions of a lease with Marco t lei i-Tours. 2 Mr. Spinelli moved to approve Resohltion No. 97-44. Mr. Price seconded the motion. Motion passed unanimously. VIII. OLD BUSINESS- None IX. NEW BUSINESS Mr. Lazarus stated thc Authority would like to thank Mr. Dru~, Stall Mr. Cartiere. and Mr. Chcwning Ibr a job well done this year and would like to wish everyone a Merry Christmas and l lappy New Year. Mr. I)rury stated this is thc best Airport Authority ho has ever worked tbr and is very happy with thc tlexibility the Airport Authority allows him to get the jobs done. Mr. Drury thnnks all Airport Authority tbr having fitith in him to get thc job done. X. Ai).IOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 2:45 2 NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT 735 8TH STREET SOUTH, NAPLES, FL 34102 Tel. 941.434.4655; Suncom 974.4655; No. 941.434.3059; email naplesnrm@naplesnet.com NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING The Beach Renourishment/Maintenance Committee announces a public meeting to which all interested persons are invited. DATE: Thursday 12 February 1998 TIPIE: 9:00 A.M. PLACE: City Council Chambers, 735 Florida 34102 Eighth Street South, Naples, AGENDA 1. Roll Call. 2. Changes to agenda. 3. Consideration of approval of the minutes of the 08 January 1998 meeting. 4. Project updates: A) South Channel/Water Turkey Bay dredging; B) Wiggins Pass dredging; C) proposal for larger upland sand stockpile; D) rock removal project. 5. Report on Florida Shore & Beach Preservation Association technical conference, 04 to 06 February. 6 Report on meeting with County Administrator Fernandez reference committee makeup and responsibilities. 7. Report on meeting with Emergency Management Director Pineau reference post disaster recovery planning. 8. Discussion of the Incremental Beach Maintenance and Managemen~ Plan. 9. Agenda for next meeting, 05 March 1998. i0. Open public input. 1i. Adjourn. Fi}.".:.L AiTi::: :.iA':' ~E TAKEN CT: Al:':' :l-2!~ ':Si'JSSE: CF. AirE: TS THiS AGE:::A. A/:'f ?ERS::: WHO iFil:ES TC AZF:qA: Al:: :El:/'::; It&iH B':' THiS ,:C:-~"-::TiEE ~:Tk' ~ES?E=T TO Al:':' iQ%TiE.= CC::Si:E.=,E2 AT THIS MEETING WiLL :;EEL A .:,HIST: iF .-HE .:~7E£2::;33 A::: :',A':' :;rE: T,: E::£U.~E THAT A '.'HR,:ATT:,'. REIS.:: iS :.L~iE, ~Hi:H RECCRZ ::;itU:ES THE ?EST::-:C:;':' £'.'::E:;iE U~C:: WHi:H THE A~.~EAL iS TS -=E HEAR=. Al:':' FEFS::: WiTH A :iSA-~ILITY RE=UiR::;G AUi.i:LiAF'f AiiS SEF','iiE3 FCR .'}{iS :.!EET:::$ :LAY :ALL THE iiTV CLE.::<'3 DFFiiE AT 4.:4-4'01 WiTH RET'SESTS AT LEAST TwC 5£~'t~K TH". MEETi::S DAT£. For additional information, please contact Jon Staiger at 434- 4655. .J?~n.~..,,s.:.a_i_?.e.r..,.. P.~h.D.~ Natural Resources Manager Norris ,'/ Hancock "' ~/~// Constantine Mac'Kle ,~ Berr~ / i6G EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES AI)VISORY COUNCIl. (EMSAC) AGENDA February 25, 1998 2:00 i'.M. ilEAl.TI! BUll.DING 3~m FI.OOR 3301 EAST TA,%I IA ,%1 ! TRA ! !. (iAI,I. T() ()lgl)l,;l~, APPROVAl. OF MINI. VI'ES O1,I) BIISINESS NEW B[!SINESS PI.EASE NOI'E: All future ineelin~ dates ,,viii be held hist Wedllesdav of each month at 2:00 P.M. unless you are notified of a neccssa~' {late or time change. Morr~S Hancock Constant the Mac 'K '~e ..... ",erry -- COLLIER COUNTY COM~IUNITY I)EVI,;LOI)M ENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES DIVISION - iIOUSING AND URBAN I.~IPROVE.~I ENT 28(10 North llor.~cshoc Drive Naples, Florida 341(14 (941) 403-2330 (941) 403-2331 (FAX) 2 DRAFT- DISCUSSION PURPOSE ONLY I':NTI:,I{I)I{ISI:: ZONE I)ISVEI,OI)MENT AGENCY .'klINI'TI';S Oi: NO~'I'~.~II~ER 13, 1997 EZI)..\ .~I E I':'!'! N(; Thc motnhlv linterprisc Zone l)cx'ek?mcnt Agency meeting was held on Xlomtav. August 18, 1997 at thc Florida ('ommtmitv Bank, lmmokalee, Florida, In attendance x\ ere Fred Thomas, Jr, l)avid Lindscy, Carol Losa deLara. Al Newman, Pauline Nexvborn - stafl~ Robert Asbel, Jr, Raymond }-Iolhmd, Lawrence Perez - staff} Lucy Ortiz, and Jim Penzcvkowski :\ Cluorur~l :vas presort! ap, d thc meeting was called to order by Chairman Thomas dt 2 30 p m .,\ motion u. as made by C';u'ol [.,osa tlulara to approve the minutes of August 18, 1997. and seconded by Jim I'enzcvkox~ski after a quick review by the board the motion passed ,\ correction v, as made as to the to next scheduled meeting dates for the Enterprise Zone l)cvelopmcnt Agency After discussion the next scheduled meeting are as follows, please adjust your calendars accordingly February 12. 1998 itt 2 0() Mav I,l, 1998 al 2 I)¢)p .\tlUtlsl I.~. l<)t)N itt 2 ~t') I) \l Nit ..\l Ncc\man ~s ,._,o,ng tt~ speak to .Xl~ I~m Ncxarez aboul resigning I¥0111 the board This resignation so that it can be turned in and X Ir Al Newman can be nominated H~ncock a .,__ · Constant tne_ v/ ~lac'K1e t_/" .// .... ,, Berr~' Nit. I~obert ,,\sbel of the £'ollier County Sheritt's Department has been nominated by the board and ,.,,'ill be submitting a resume to stalY for approval by the Board of Count',' Commissioners :\ Supl)or! Committee bas been created by tile board to help Ms. Pauline Newborn of the Department ct' l~,cvenue to help and educate all new businesses in Immokalee of the tax incentives that i~c ;.lx,'iti]ztblt: in thc enterprise zone. Ms. Lucy Ortiz will help Ms. Newborn in contacting and spcakinu t(~ thc ne,.~, businesses Thc Suppc~rt ('t~nmittc,z will c{,ntitct I"lc)rida l.cgal Nerx,'iccs about having someone l¥om their oftice translate st)~:e off the tax incentives literature provided by the state Discussion was entertained un putting on another tax incentives seminar fur the benet;t ot' the board members on all the enterprise zone tax incentives. ,Stall' will coordinate this ctt'ort itlld will nt~til'v tile board ct'date it ,,will be held. .'vlr Fred Thomas suggested thc idea about handing out a green packet of the tax incentives flor c'~crv it~dividt~al obtaining an occupational license that ~ill be starting a business in Immokalcc Stall",,.ill look irtto it and bri~l{2 back intk)rmation lo thc board Slatt' di.sctJs~,cd ii,id hltndt.'d out lt~ thc' t)t>it~cl it packet center[ling Ihe I t)()O lmmigratit~n Act and the dc.s~gnntion flor In'~moknlee along with all the incentives The t,oard will review at its ox,.'n Icisulc Mr Fred Thomas and Ihe board discussed the elt'octs of NAFTA and tile business sun, ey prepared alld mailed out by Babcock's Furniture Store Stall' mentioned to the board the possibility of reviewing the survey so that it might be able to incorporate the inIbrmation tbr a designation by NAD[3.ANK gtatt' went on further to say what NADBANK represented and thc benefits it n:ight be able to do t~r Immokalee. Thc meeting xxas adjt,t~rned al '~ 15 i) m l~,cspectl'ully submitted ! [.awrence i:'urez l lUI Manager Al, !,~ 1", P() R'I' I clcph~mc i~¢4 I'rcF~arcd I'~', · \ ()pt'r:,ti,n,. and ;~cc,,ml)li,,hmt. nts durin~ Ihi~, timv i)vriotl: Meetings: 3 14 97 IJu~l ~. ~,n I h~ll mci ,.s ]th ~LJSlnCt, S ~x~.ncr,, ;LSS~ClaLcd with thc Imlv:,,kalcc ('hi~lllbcr ~1' L ~mmcrL'c 5971':ZI}A 3 ~)7 I'.ZI)A %%'ork.sh()l)S: 3 7 17 u7 :~CC()ItlJ)li.Shlltellt.~ ;lllCJ J)l'OJJ, f'e~ l.'(Jlleel'llill~ il]llllCltll.,lll~lliOll (II' the phi I1: I'lr,,I Cltl~ll-tcr J~lcLJ'~ud k~ll J'./J),,\ hCL;~HIllII~ %cc::lld qkl~lrlcr I'oCLI',Cd :H1 IIHIIIIIIL' ',UllllI1~Irs ~llld II'l;.lrJ,,ullll:.! ~: Ibc cnl:.'rprlhc tit.' c i i IL~ l'j) I'I.%L' \umli)er :lnd l.','l)e% i;l' bu.qnc.%st,~ as~i.%led hv liie EZI)A: As.si.stance: Iclcph~mc call,,. 126 Inlcl'AL~UllCy I11~Iim, .ltl ~fllcntlce~ :il I~BlllOkaJuc ('haHlJ:or ,,l ~ ,llllt]lL'l'L'U Iitisint'S.~ a.%si%led h~' almvc: :.':m~ultants, li]LII1LII'~ICLLI[II]~. ['~l~JJJ. ;l['rlctJJltir~LI Number of jol).$ created ~'ithin the enterprise zone: 'the usit~e and revenue imp:icl (~l' Iii(' .:';tale ince[itive.,~ ~r':Inlcd: '(~mnmunitv (;ontrihution.% Tax ('redits: Nlmn.~lms Approved: 3., 1()/~}7 (}rcatcr Immokalcc Chamber ~1' ('ommcrcc/ Main Street Project itL'C-[ J)onalions A pi)ri)ye(J: ()lht'rNlalu(;ranls/incenli~t,s J{ccei~c(l: N()nc Jif IIS;I~(' ;llliJ I't'T t'l)ll(' IllJl'('~(llit· illiJJ ilIVt'STIII('Ill ~('ll('l';IJt'lJ illCenti~ cs ~r'afllcd: ~tlllliJ)('r ()J' I~usinc,,,, I tili/.in~ Jnt'k'lilJ',t'.%: I'~Jlal ..% :~,lll(Itllll ill Incunlive.%: Acm I{c.%(.qtl-ces accessed :is a resull of being located in an i-:nlCrl)rise Zone: Number: Zcrt~ I (;t:ll S :'q, lllCJlJili: COLLIER COUNTY ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA February 4,1998; 9:00 a.m. COMMISSION BOARDROOM, THIRD FLOOR--ADMINISTRATION BUILDING I. ROLL CALL II. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - January 7,1998 III. ADDENDA IV. CONSENT/ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL AGENDA All matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one motion without separate discussion of each item. If discussion is desired bv a member of the Board, that Rem(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and' considered separately. V. REGULAR AGENDA Ao Subdivision Master Plan Estates Villas of Embassy Woods Section 5, Township 50 South, Range 26 East Collier County, Florida Planned Unit Development Petition No. PUD-97-19 Magnolia Pond PUD Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 26 East Collier County, Florida Planned Unit Development Petition No. PUD-90-36(1) Saddlebrook Village PUD Section 34, Township 49 South, Range 26 East Collier County, Florida Commercial Excavation Permit No. 59.632 Creative Homes Commercial Excavation Golden Gate Estates, Tract 91, Unit 59 Collier County, Florida Norris _ / -- Hancock Constanttne_~ ~ Mac'K~e _ / - Berr.¥ Misc. Corres: , Date: .L')! ',q 3! Copies To'. Environmental Advisor)' Board Agenda ...................................... February 4,1997 Page 2 2 VI. OLD BUSINESS VII. NEW BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT IX. WORKSHOP NOTES: [Board Members[: Notify the PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (403- 2400) no later than 5 P.M. on January 30,1998, ifyou cannot attend this meeting or if you have conflict and thus will abstain from voting on a particular petition. [General Public[: Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto; and therefi~re may need to insure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based, MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD DATE: TIME: PI.ACE: January 7, 1998 9:00 a.m. 3"~ Floor Boardroom, Administration Building, Collier County Government Center, Naples, Flor/da EAB STAFF PRESENT Dejong X Espinar X Foley Excused Absence Hermanson Excused Absence Hill X Hinchcliff _X Saadeh Excused Absence Chrzanowski _X Lenberger X Seal X Wiley [ MINUTES BY: Stephen Lenberger, Environmental Specialist II CALLED TO ORDER AT: 9:00 a.m. ADJOURNED AT: 10:00 a.m. PRESIDING: Paul Hinchcliff, Chairman ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA: EAB Member Orientation on January 22, 1998 APPROVAL OF MINUTES: Motion made by Mr. Hill, seconded by Mr. Espinar and carded 4/0, to approve minutes of December 3, 1997. ITEM: PETITION NO: M.A. Planned Unit Development Petition No. PUD-97-16 Naples Forest Country Club PUD Environmental Advisory Board Minutes .................... .................... January. 7, 1998 Page 2 REQUESTING: The petitioner intends to construct a 785 unit residential subdivision within an 18 hole gol f course. The total project area is 485.02 acres, and will also include 150,000 square feet ofcommerciat/office space on 15+_ acrcs. REPRESENTED BY: Dwight D. Nadeau, MeAnly Engineering and Design, Inc. Geza Wass de Gzege, Southern Biomes EIS, Inc. Richard McCormick, Post Buckley, Schuh & Jefigan, Inc. MOTION: Made by Mr. Hill, seconded by Ms. Dejong and carried 4/0, to approve Planned Unit Development Petition No. PUD 97-16 with amended stipulations: Water ManaEement: Thc development project area shall be designed to consider regional stormwater flows and include the passage ofoffsite flows from the north to the south through the western portion of thc propcny in a manner consistent with project development plans. The Developer shall grant the necessary drainage easements outside the Naples Forest Surface Water Management System and within western portions of the project to Collier County to provide adequate regional stormwater management flowways and facilities. The easement shall be granted after the Naples Forest has received permits from the State and Federal agencies and within 90 days of receipt of the drainage easement documents from Collier County. The easement rights shall be subject to and consistent with Developer's development plans, including Developer's wetland mitigation plans. o The Developer shall be responsible for providing, in a manner consistent with Developer's project development plans, adequate facilities and/or flowways necessary to pass through the project boundaries the offsite stormwater which currently flows towards the Naples Forest property. Design of the improvements shall be closely coordinated with the County Stormwater Management Department to endeavor to maintain uniformly with the County's Lely Area Stormwater Improvement project, currently under design. A. The offsite flow rate will be calculated by the Developer's engineer and accepted by the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) based on existing permitted projects upstream. If Collier County disagrees with the offsite flow estimate, the County shall provide supporting documentation to the Developer's engineer and the SFWMD. Environmental Advisory Board Minutes ........................................ January. 7, 1998 Page 3 B. Such facilities may include, but are not limited to: 1. Regrading of the Naples Forest western easement area to reestablish historic sheetflow along such portion of the property. 2. Excavation of small ponds in the flowway for additional storage area. Construction of a control structure to detain a portion of the offsite flows. Design of such a control structure shall be by the Developer's engineers. The control structure will be maintained by Collier County and the Developer shall not have liability for impacts to properties upstre,',m due to thc County's control of the structure's control elevation. Collier County agrees to maintain the control structure in a manner as described in these stormwater conditions. Collier County acknowledges that the Developer's commitment to construct facilities to control offsite runoff may be precluded by the inability to timely obtain the issuance of necessary permits. The Developer's failure to timely obtain such permits that include the offsite stormwater runoff faculties will not be considered a breach of these stipulations. In such an c~'ent, the Developer agrees to provide the necessary drainage easements (subject to and consistent with Developer's use of the easement areas as described al:ore) at a later date, if Collier County obtains construction permits for the factlities as part of the regional drainage basin improvements. In thc event a water level control structure in the flowway and/or improvements to the capacity of thc stormwater conveyance system along Rattlesnake Hammock Road to regulate or improve off-site stormwater flows is required by SFWMD as part of thc Naples Forest project permitting, the County sha!l reimburse the developer for the cost of such control structure and/or improvements to thc stormwater conveyance system along Rattlesnake Hammock Road (less the developer's proportionate share of such cost) as soon as reasonably possible and not later than thc time an area wide funding mechanism is established for stormwater improvements. Also, at the time of such reimbursement, thc County shall reimburse the developer for the cost of excavating a flowway (excluding any cost related solely to aesthetics) along the western portion of the property. The developer's proportionate share is calculated based upon the Naples Forest development discharge divided by the total regional discharge. If any of thc regional stormwater improvements cause additional xvetland impacts which must be mitigated in the Naples Forest permit, the County will pay the Developer for the cost of such mitigation. 166 2 Environmental Advisor, Board Minutes ........................................ January 7, 1998 Page 4 6. A South Florida Water Management District Surface Water Management Permit will be required for this project prior to the start of any construction. Environmental: o I. Amend Section 2.12 of the PUD document to read as follows by adding the underlined language and deleting the ~,..,~t. Where the development of land within Naples Forest Country Club PUD requires a permit from a local, state, or federal agency with jurisdiction over the property proposed for development, the developer shall obtain such permits prior to final development order approval as may ~-~ i d ~'-:^" "- 'J-~ corem ........ , ,,~requ re j .......................... Amend Section 2.14 of the PUD document to read as follows by adding the underlined language and deleting the ,,,,.,..t, ............... ,...,.. language, Pursuant to Subsection 2.7.3.3. of the Land Development Code, upon adoption of thc PUD Ordinance and attendant PUD Master Plan, the provisions of the PUD document become a part of the Land Development Code, and shall be the standards of development for the PUD. Thenceforth, development in the area delineated as the PUD District on the Official Zoning Atlas ,,','ill be governed by the adopted development regulations and PUD Master Plan. ~ P ap"f3 ""' .... specific Amend Section 7.8 D of the PUD document to read as follows by adding the underlined language and deleting the et.*"ack t!'.reugh language,.. The petitioner shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Sen, ice (U&SFWS) and the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (FGFWFC) regarding potential impacts to "listed species"...Where protected species are observed on site, a Habitat Management Plan for thos~ protected species shall be submitted to Current Plannine, environmental staff fo~ review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. - Environmental Advisory. Board Minutes ........................................ January. 1 ~.9'8 PaRe 5 ITEM: V.B. PETITION NO: Commercial Excavation Permit No. 59-626 Yhovani Otero Excavation REQUESTING: The petitioner proposes to excavate a 1.8 acre lake on a 5 acre tract in Golden Gate Estates. An estimated total of 32,400 C.Y. of material is to be excavated with approximately 900 C.Y. lo remain on-site and the remainder to be sold and hauled off- site. The lake will be excavated to the commercial depth of 20 feet. REPRESENTED BY: Jeff Davidson, Davidson Engineering, Inc. MOTION: Made by Mr. ttill, seconded by Mr. Espinar and carried 4/0, to approve Commercial Excavation Permit No. 59-626 with amended stipulations: 1. Should the stockpile tlc in place for a period exceeding 60 days, the stockpile shall be seeded and mulched and erosion control devices put in place. ITEM: PETITION NO: g.c. Subdivision Master Plan Estates Villas of Embassy Woods Postponed due to a lack ora quorum. Mr. Espinar abstained from the vote. ITEM: PETITION NO: g.D. Planned Unit Development Petition No. PUD-97-19 Magnolia Pond PUD Postponed due to a lack of a quorum. Mr. Espinar abstained from the vote. 16G 2.. Environmental Advisory. Board ~iilllltes ......................................... lanuao' 7, 1998 Page 6 .I. TEM; PETITION NO: REQUESTING: REPRESENTED BY: V.E. Special Treatment Permit No. ST-97-2 Enclave Professional Center The project is a proposed 33000sf/11 building commercial office park with an "ST" designated preserve area on the ',','est side of the property. Gary Butler, Butler Engineering, Inc. MOTION: Made by Mr. Espinar, seconded by Ms. Deion.g and carried 4/0, to approve Special Treatment Permit No. ST-97-2 with Staffs stipulations: Environmental/Water Manaaement: Permits or letters of exemption from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) and the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) shall be presented prior to final site development plan approval. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring and maintenance plan for the site, with emphasis on the ST area, shall be submitted to Cun'ent Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval prior to final site development plan appro'.'al. COMMENTS: For a complete record ofthc proceedings reader is directed to the tape recording of this meeting, located in the Office of the Clerk to the Board, 5th Floor. Building "F". Collier County, Government Complex. ]'here being no further business, the meeting was adjourned by order of thc Chair. Environmental Advisory Board Paul Hinchcliff, Chairman EAB Staff Rcports/h:\den 16G 2 COI.I.IER COUNTY ENVIRON.MENT..'~i...'~I)VISORY BOARD A(;END..'~ .March 4. 1908:9:00 a.m. CO,MMISSION BOARDROO.M. TlilRD FI.OOR--AD.MINISTRATION BUII.DINC I. ROI.L CALL II..'\PPROVAL OF MINUTES - .March 4. 1998 III..'\DDENDA IV. CONSENT,'ADMINISTRATIVE ..\PPROVAL AGENDA .Ali matters listed under this item are considered to be routine and action will be taken by one motion without separate discussion ofeach item. Ifdiscussion is desired by a member of the Board, that item(s) will be removed from the Consent Agenda and considered separately. V. REGULAR AGENDA A. Conditional Use Petition No. CU-97-25 Stirn's Social Club Section 30, Township 48 South, Range 27 East Collier County, Florida Preliminary Subdivision Plan Petition No. PSP-97-6 North Collier Industrial Center Section I0, Township 48 South. Range 25 East Collier County, Florida Planned Unit Development Petition No. PUD-9~-01 Whippoop, vill Woods PUD Section 18. Township 49 South. Range 26 East Collier County, Florida Planned Unit Development Petition No. PUD-97-20 Golden Pond PUD Section 34, Township 48 South, Range 26 East Collier County, Florida C..,,.~ To: Norris ~_~/- ...... Hancock Constantine Berr~ - Environmental Advisor3., Board Agenda ...................................... March 4. 1998 Page 2 VI. OLD BUSINESS VII. NEW BUSINESS VIII. ADJOURNMENT IX. WORKSHOP NOTES: IBoard Membersl: Notify the PLANNING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (403- 2400) no later than 5 P.M. on February 27,, 1998, ifyou cannot attend this meeting or ifyou have conflict and thus xvill abstain from voting on a particular petition. IGeneral Publicl: Any person who decides to appeal a decision of this board ,,,.'ill need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto: and therefore max, n,2cd to insure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. which rccor'd includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. 2 MINUTES OF TIlE ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY BOARD DATE: TIME: PI.ACE: EAB FcbruaD' 4. 1998 9:00 a.m. 3rd Floor Boardroom. Administration Building, Collier County (;overnmcnt Center. Naples, Florida STAFF PRESENT Dcjong X Ashton Espinar X Burgcson X Foley X Chrzanowski X Ilcrmanson A rri`.'¢d 9:{)5 Kuck I lill X I.enbergcr X Hinchcliff X Mulhere Saadch Arrived 9:{)5 Seal MINUTES BY: Stephen i.cnbcrgcr, En`.'ironmcntal Specialist II ADJOURNED AT: CALLED TO ORDER AT: 9:00 a.m. PRESIDING: Paul ltinchcliff. Chairman ADDENDA TO TIlE AGENDA: APPROVAL OF ,MINI!TES: Motion made by January 7. 1998. IL:00 a.m. Mr. Foley, seconded bv Ms. Dejon.g and camcd 5/0. to approve minutes of ITEM: PETITION NO: REQUESTING: Regular Agenda - hem V.A. Subdivision Master Plan Estates Villas of Embassy Woods Proposed 23 acre s~ngle family subdivision with 5 t attached villas on 102 platted single family lots. MOTION: Made by Mr. Eoley, seconded by Mr. Saadeh and carried 6/0. to apl:rove Estates Villas of Embassy Woods Subdivision Master Plan with Staffs stipulations. Mr. Esptnar abstained from thc ,.'otc. Water Management: Environmental Advisory Board Minutes ........................................ February Pn~e 2 I, That thc I)eveloper obtain a mmlifieatlon to the SI:WMI) permit for kmbassv \Voods. Environmental: Pernuts or letters of exemption from the II.S. Army Corps of lingmeers (,,\(.'()F.) and thc South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) shall be presenlcd prmr m linal plat/constructmn plan approval. Upland Rccreatmnal ()pen Space (tlR()S) areas shall be recorded on thc plat as conservation/preservation areas wilh uses and limitations similar to or as per sccuon 704.06 of the Florida statues. ('onservation areas shall be dethcated ~m thc plat to the project's homeowners assOCmlmn or like entity lbr ownership and ma~,~tcnance rcsp(msthilities and to ('~dl~cr t'ountv with no responsibility fi)r maintenance. I'R()S areas must average at least 25 I~et wide. An exotic vegetation removal / maintenance plan for the sile. with emphasis on the conscrvauon / prcscrvauon areas, shall be included on the final construcuon plan. This plan shall include the methods of exotic vegetation removal m he used within conservation/prescr~.ation areas. ITEM: Regular Agenda - Item VB. PETITION NO: Planned Unit l)evelopmcnt Petition No. PUD-97-19 Magnolia Pond P[TD REQI:ESTINC,: l~roposcd 294 residential units with associated recreational facilities. REI'RESENTED BY: Beau Keene, Keene Engineering M()TIf)N: Made by Mr. I lermanson, seconded by Mr. Foley and carried 6/0. to approve Planned Unit Development Petition No. PLID-97-19 with added stipulations. Mr. [:.spinar abstained from iht ','otc. Water Manattement: !. SWFWMI) Rlght-of-\Vay Permit and Discharge F'ermit for out-fall into the Golden (late ('anal shall be submitted prior to Development Plan approval. From 1-75 North to lhe mare Golden (late ("anal. thc Developer shall be responsible for clearing vegetation t?om the existing 25' drainage easement and leveling the existing spoil plies to Ibrm a 15' wide maintenance travclwav alonu the west bank of thc cx~sting ditch. In addition, all vcgctatmn shall be rcmo,~;cd frown the top w~dth oflhc cx~stmg ditch located on the adjacent 30' drainage easement. All cut stumps shall be treated with an appropriate herbicide to prevent re-bwowth. 16G 2 Environmental Advisory Board Minutes ........................................ February. 4. 1998 Page 3 3, Petitioner must obtain permission from property owners abutting thc north side of the access road to place roadv,'av Iill (sideslopes) on their property. ..\uthonzatmn from Collier County and FDOT must be obtained prior to constructing culverts under the access road for conveying 1-75 runoff and runoff I'rom south of 1-75. Environmental: 1. Thc lbllowmg language shall be added thc environmental section of the I'UD document Section 4.10: A. '"ll~is I'[ ti) shall comply with the cnv~ronmenlal scctmns of Ibc (.'oilier '.'ounty l.and Development ('ode and (Jrowth Management Plan conservation and ('oastal Management Element at the time of final development order approval." B. A Gopher tortoise relocation/management plan shall be submitted to Current Planning Environmental Staff for review and approval. A copy of thc approved plan language shall be included on the final Site Development Plan." C. Prior to final development order approval (FSDP) thc petitioner shall submit a copy of the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission Gopher Tortoise Permit. ITEM: PETITION NO: Regular Agenda - Item V.C. Planned Unit l)evetopment Petition No. PUD-90-36{I) Saddlcbrook Village PUD REQUESTING: Proposed 33.79 acre rental apartment project with 438 residential dwelling units, recreational facilities, storm water rctcnuon lakes and preserve aFeas. REPRESENTED BY: Dwight Nadeau, MeAnly Engineering & Design, Inc. William MeAnly, MeAnly Engineering & Design, Inc. .MOTION: Made by Mr. I lermanson, seconded bv Mr. Saadeh and carried 7..'0, to approve Planned Unit Development Petition No. PUD-90-36( I ) with added stipulations. Water Manaeement: 1. That Saddlebrook Village PUD must obtain a SFWMD Surface Water Management Pen'ntt prior to SDP approval. The Developer w~ll coordinate an agreement xvith both Collier County and Iht SFWMD to address the following issues: Environmental Advisory Board Minutes ........ : ............................... Februa~' 4. 1998 Pal~e 4 a) Adequacy el" the outlhll route to Ihe Golden (;ate ('anal to thc north b) Appropriate hydratmn of thc wetlands on property to thc cast to insure wetland I~mction. and. c) Future routing of runoff I?om thc properly lo lhe cast through Saddlcbr,mk V~llagc. ..\,nv m~provcmcnts v,'lll be subject Io ('oilier ('ountv and SF\VMD approval. Environmental: I. Rct'crence scctmn 5.3 of the PUD document next to thc land usc table on thc PUD master plan. Pcl~lmncr proposes Io retain live (51 acres of upland preserve and six t6~ acres of wetland preserve as Illustralcd tm the PI 'I) maslcr plan. Revise the land usc table on lhe Pl il) master plan ~,ccorthngly. 3. ,,\dd the following snpulation to scctmn 6.8 of the I'lJ'D document: In the event the project does not require platting, all conservation areas shall be recorded as conscrvation/preservatton tracts or easements dedicated to an approved entity or to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance and subject to thc uses and limitations similar to or as per Florida stat:ires section 704.06. ITE.M: Regular Agenda - Item V.D. I'ETII'I()N NO: ('ommercml [:,xcavatmn Pcrm)t No. 59.632 ('reatwe l lomes Commercial Excavation REOI'ESTIN(;: l'roposlng to excavate a 1.8 acre lake on a 5 acre tract ~n (iolden Gate Estates. RI'iI'RESENTEI) BY: Merlin Banaham. Creative I{omes of SW Florida. Inc. .M()TI()N: Made bv Mr. Foley. seconded by Mr. Saadeh and carried 6/I. to ,:pprovc ('ommercml Excavatton Permit No. 59.632 with ,',;tat'l's snpulations: 'l'he excavation shall lie limited to a bottom elevation of 16 feet below cxtstmg grade and shall be no shallower than 10 feet below exlsnng grade. I'etmoncr must create a 20' Easement around the lake bank so that Collier ('ountv can continue m maintain the cx~sting canal bank upstream and downstream of the project. Ofl~ite removal of material shall be subject to standard conditions imposed by the Transponatmn Department lattachcdL Environmental Advisory Board Minutes ........................................ Februarw 4. 1998 No blasting will he permitted unless sssucd a separate permst by ('oilier County F. ngmecrmg Rex'sew Servsces. If vcgctatmn ~s to be removed ils a result of the excavation, a separate Vcgctatmn Removal l'¢mnt (per Collier ('ounty I.and l)cvclopmcnt Code. Division 9) shall be obtained from ('ollicr ('mmtv l)cvclopmcnl Services [)cpartmcnt before commencing work. 2 NEW BUSINESS: Motion made by Mr. llill to have submittal packages received by EAB members lwo weeks prmr to thc meeting. The motson was not seconded. ('()M,MENTS: For a complete record of thc proceedings reader is directed to thc tape recording or' this meeting, located in the ()ffice of thc ('lcrk lo the Board, 5th Floor, Building "F'. Collier ('ounty, (}ovcrnmcnt Complex. There being no further business, thc meeting was adjourned by order of thc (_'hair. linvlronmcntal Advisory Board Min/h:\EAB Forms Paul lhnchcliff, Chairman 2 Minutes of January z, 998 SUMMARY OF MOTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Minutes to the meeting of December 9, 1997: Bonnet Bacon made a motion to accept the minutes as submitted; seconded by Mark Houghton and carried unanimously. 6. TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES REPORT There was a lengthy discussion regarding the additional services for the interior roadways. Mark Houghton motioned to approve the change order for previously approved additional scheduled services to be provided by Commercial Land Maintenance to the arterial medians; seconded by Bonnet Bacon and carried unanimously. D Val distributed copies of a memo from Larry Henry, Superintendent of the Road and Bridge regarding the costs to provide bush hog mowing services to Golden Gate. This was discussed at great length. The apparent cost is $11,333.20 annually for eight services. Based on the information provided. Bonner Bacon made a motion authorizing the transfer of the remainder of $11,333.20 allocated from the appropriate fund so that these services can be provided by the existing maintenance contractor; seconded by Mark Houghton and carried unanimously. Hancock Constant lne_ Berry cate Beauttf-tcatlon Advisory ^ e tdrt - Febnul,r}, 10, 1998 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. Meeting called to order Roll Call Approval of Minutes - Meeting of January 12, 1998 Landscape Maintenance Report - Chuck Buckley Landscape Architect's Report - Mike McGee Transportation Administration Services Report - Val Prince Commiltee Members' Reportg Old Business Now Busir~ess Put)lic Cotangents Adjournment Next Meeting: Marct] 10, 1998, 4:00 p.m. @ Golclen Gate Communitv Center Golden Gate Beautt, ficat, iott Advisory of January 998 committee 1. Meeting called to order at 4:15 p.m. at the Golden Gate Community Center. Roll Call: Present: Cheryle Newman, Bonner Bacon, Mark Houghton, members. Val Prince, Transportation Administrative Services; Mike McGee, McGee & Associates; Chuck Buckley, Commercial Land Maintenance; Jacqueline Silano, secretary. Excused: Sabina Musci, member. Absent: Charles McMahon. member. Minutes to the meeting of December 9, 1997: accept the minutes as submitted; seconded unanimously. Bonner Bacon made a mo:ion to by Mark Houghton and carried 4. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT Referring to Mike McGee's December Quarterly Maintenance Report. Chuck advised that the tree pruning has been completed. Additional trees that are not included in the contract have also been pruned: 152 pine trees. 50 Bottlebrush and/or wax myrtles. Two dead palms. Two dead pines and three stumps have also been removed. These items have been invoiced B. Cheryle requested that the Christmas decorations be removed. C. Chuck reported that maintenance was performed as authorized at last month's meeting on 20 interior medians . D. There were no irrigation problems to report. 5. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S REPORT Mike McGee distributed copies of his December Quarterly Maintenance Report. He indicated that he is pleased with the condition of the medians. He suggested that the bougainvillea in median 6 be replaced with Ixora and that a dead Cabbage palm in median 10 be removed. He also recommended increase the iron application to 25%. B. With regard to the newly planted oak trees, Mike suggested waiting until spring to evaluate their condition. 6. TRANSPORTATION ADMINISTRATION SERVICES REPORT A. Val Prince advised that Steve Fabiano has resigned and distributed copies of a memo from Steve to the beautification committees. Val distributed copies of the Executive Summary requesting the Board approve a county arterial roadway landscape improvement funding partnership with this M.S.T.U. forC.R. 951. It is scheduled for the January 27~'' BCC meeting. There was a lengthy discussion regarding the additional services for the interior roadways. Mark Houghton motioned to approve the change order for previously approved additional scheduled services to be provi¢~-;d by Commercial Land Maintenance to the arterial medians; seconded by ~.~onner Bacon and carried unanimously. Vai distributed copies of a memo from Larry Henry. Superintendent of the Road and Bridge regarding the costs to provide bush hog mowing services to Golden Gate. This was discussed at great length. The apparent cost is Sll.333.20 annually for eight services Based on the information prowded. Bonner Bacon made a motion authorizing the transfer of the remainder of Sll.333.20 allocated from the appropriate fund so that the3e services can be provided by the existing maintenance contractor; seconded by Mark Houghton and carried unanimously. Copies of the Budget Status dated January, 1998 wele distribt~ted and reviewed. Val noted that the reserves of S103,200 would be transferred to Other Contractual Services. The carry forward figures will be available in February and will be shown on the March statement. 7. OLD BUSINESS A. Bonner requested that E.B. Simmonds be contacted to lower the lights and aimed at the sign at C.R. 951. 8 NEW BUSINESS There was some discussion regarding the Christmas lights. Val will meet with Cheryle to prepare an Executive Summary turning the responsibility of the lights over to the Civic Association. As there was no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 6:05. The next scheduled meeting will be held on February 10, 1998 at 4:00 p.m. at the Golden Gate Community Center. COLLIER CO[ T GOX, TRNMENT ('().xI.\II'NITY I)EVEI.OILXlENT ..\N[) ENVII.:()N.MENTAI. SI..'RVI('E.-; t)l\'l.'4[~ }N I:cbruarv 23, 1998 NAI'I.E.q. I:[.~RII~.-\ :.;-; !~,; Ms. Christina Eggers CLG Coordinator Bureau of Historic Preservation R.A. Gray Building 500 Soulh Bronough Street Tallahassee, Florida o_.~99-0~~0 Collier County Preservation Board Meeting l)car Nls. Eggcrs' This letter is to inform you that the (.'oilier County tlistoric and Archaeological l'rescrvation Board held a public hearing on l:riday. February 20. 1998. I have cncloscd a copy of the minutes lbr your review and records. If vou have any questions or concerns regarding this meeting, please do not hesitate to contact mc itt' 941-403-2463. Very truly yours. Ray l~llows Principal Planner (('[.G Coordinator) I li.h,r~c I'rc.cr~.~tl.m RV[~, rb Sue Filson I.h~bcrl Mulhcrc N.mc'. I'rcscr~ :,ion Board } ,; rltlltlg ."qcrviccs ,l_6G MINUTES COI_LILTR COUNTY I~tc~TOP. ICAL &~ AP, ChlAEOLOGICAL [~ 17 ~: .~ ~-. kV~-, I ION P,,,,.,~t Tko.,,,. L~o .J-.o- Yo,,~. CI- D,,,,J b-'OAP. D ADDENDA TO AGENDA I'-,.NU ,= :~ APPlTOVAL OFz .... '~ Pl._ANNING $.rlRVICE$ DEPARTMENT REPORT. OLD ~:~' r',~rrnc' Norris -~yiii Hancoc~ #acC°ns~n~tne-'Kte V//'~?' " Berrl ~' ~-'~ iXl Dt.~CU:~.~IO OF ADDF:NDA NGXT H[::GTING h'b,J, :o ,o,:~ ,,~. o oo A hl (Co4,,-,~. P.=- 'F_') I .~,W(~.:,-~.'-.::- ." : ~:",' .- : ." ,'.' ."~ .;" . ~ ~ : ~, - ,'~ '.,.:~.,.-.., , :.--,'.',* ' · ..... ' '~-', , =', , . -" , ! .(.",,&;,~i~',. ':,":':......:.. ": ~.,"... ~..: - .,~.',~:- ; - .--;.,~d;W...',~,'~- '.. ,-.',:, '~ :., :.;.' :'" :. (~.' '. ~. :~' . · ,...,~%,.-.,~:.:~.._., ........ 1-11~ 1~1~, Kl~ .~. :.~.., .. ..... . .., ,.., .... ,.~, .......... .... "'~ !-: ~ "' '""' . "-.': 'k ..,.;.r.:.,"'::~.e. 'l~ , ., ;:.,,. ,.~ ,; · ~ .... ~ = ' . . . · ..~ ~ -¢'.~o~-'.' .. , .. ... ' ... . ,-,;,...,'. . ~-; ..,.~ · . .. . .. .... :,;.;..., ,,.'?' .. ._, :- · ' March 30 'April 1, '.1998 "i' ,:' ,,. ';' ,.- ;I . : , . 'r~ · · -'"L '; [. ;: ...;: ..~ ' % ' '~ *' " ' "" '::'" .. ......... , ,:. ~,, _ _. l... _/ m/a/~ass~, r/da ..... Flo 7,'i'.::' .. :..' .-Sixteenth Annual Preservation Da,,' °Armed with Current Information, Meet ~vith Your l,egislators " · Make Your Voice I leard - Speak Out for Preservation · Reception to llonor the Florida Legislature & Secretary of State Sandra B. 5Iortham · Network v,'ith Florida Preservationists . , SCIII';I)LILE OF EVENTS 5!onday, 5larch 30, 1998 . ' ' ..".'. Wednesd,4y, April I, 1998 '" 1:00- 5:0O t:M. ' .... . ........ - .... , 8:30A.M. .... ' ........... SccrctaD' of thc Interior's Standards \Vorkshop Advocacy Breakfast RA. Grav Jluilding. (hound Floor. [Education Room Thc Old Capitol 500 S. lhonom.:h Street. '[allahas,~cc l louse of Representatives Chambers Tuesday, .'Nlarch 31, 1998 2:00 - 5:00 I:M. }[istoric l'rcscrxation l)av Rcgistratlon R.A. (ira)' Building. (;round Floor ]']dtlC;.ltitMl Roolll 500 S. Bronough Street, Tallahasscc 9:00 - 10:00 A.AL l.cgislative Briefing Session Thc Old Capitol. }tousc of Rcprcscntati,,cs Chambers \Vclcom¢ - Tom Purcell, Florida Trust President l.cgislative Update 3:00 - 4:00 I:3L IO:OO A.M Tour of thc New Capitol Begin Lobbying. The remainder of thc da.,,' is open for Meet at thc Information Center in thc New Capitol Lobb~ lobbying meetings. West Plaz~a I.cvcl Reniember to make ap?oit~tmcnts with your legi.s'lators ,Sk'e the Ncw Ca/,itol on a ~uided tour and explore ..... . before arriving in I~llahassee. the hmcr workings of the l'7orida (~egislature.' · ' .... .... 53~-,":'~ ..~-.+ -.", ~.'~.' . "~ I:O0-5:00~Mu.'¢.:' ' ' ' - '.'-,'.:' . ~ ' · '- 6:Jo: S:JOP. M.. ' .' :.':'~ :?~, ;?: 7;7,: ~..' '".??;.'" ~:. '. ?':~.~ :-; ,'. ' ' ..... :" ' ..... '"' ' .... Stewar~hip~ements 101 Wor~hop .' . - . .~' ..... ',:...;,,-.,.,~,~ ...... ':~f'.. ~.~- .'~>~-:~-~ ~ . .; .... · , ~ ,~, ...~:: .,' ._ ,. ~.. }hstonc Prcsc~'at~on Day Opcmng Reception ".'.. '. ~ ...... ' ~.::. ".: R.A. GrayB~ddmg, Ground Floor, Education R~m .... Governor's Club - Sccrcm Inmte your lev~slators to attend the recevtion with ,vt? ~~?b:~~~gSrg~,~,'~Jee ~4~,~-,.,~'', . :% q:-c;,'.,,.' HISTORIC.PRESERVATION DAY 1998 Co-Sponsored by the Florida Tru'st and ~he Bui-ea~ ~f Historic Preserx'a~ion 2 IIOTI.;I, II. ESERVATIONS .. , , 4. ,: ..., ., - . . A block of' rooms has bderi"r'ese~ed f&r ~"'"" ..... '" '- ' PresemaJion pay attendees at the Doubletree I totel. Please ' , [make your own rese~ation and mention that'you',arc with tlie Florida Tnmt to receive the group "' . 'rate. Due to a stt'ong demahd for hotel rd6 "au'bidg't e legislative session, please make your '.." ~..:'resen'ations today."~; ' · : .' "I;' '.%~;;~-,:~q'~;,:;]~ ~.i.::5 ~',~7,7:-~:. ~;-;. ~ "..:'~' ''~' ''~'' ~ '' ''~: ' &.a'." ''-', - 'g · '~' '-:' I01 South Adams Street, Downtown Tallahassee, Tallahassee,'Florlda · ,~ ' .-,..: (800~ 222-8733; .., .~. ,.-'._:-':~:i-. ,.,W. :?',* :' Room Rate- $109, Rooms will l}e relea'sed on March 2, 1998."' '::' ' .... ~"' ..,, ,.. ~- .¢. .' .;. 4. .}' ' . ~ :, REGISTRATION FEE Doe.~ not ittclt~de t~'orkshop Registration 'Fees EARI,Y RE(';I.qTRAT1ON: Postmarked by l~larch 13, 1998 5;25 Florida Trust Forum Member S35 Florida Trttst General Member 5;65 Non-member ' *(Includes a one ycar meml)ershlp lo thc Florida Trust) 5;35/5;30 - (;coup Rate: For Special Categor).' Applicants and Preser,,'atlon Organizations, S38 for the first person, S30 for all others from the s.'~me organization. It ix rt'qtt~rt,d that rt'gi.~tration for all members ara group be submltt,,~l togetht,r. · REGISTRATION FORM .1.~ .-.l.. ,:. ;.., Please make a copy of this form for each person attending Preservation Da}'. Name Organization/Firm I.ATE & ON-SITE REGISTRATION: After ~l;trch 13, 1998 $35 Florida Trust Forum Member $45 Florida Trust Member S45/S40 Group Rates S75 Non-Metal)er' *(Includes one )'car membership to the Florida Trust) Address City/State/Zip Daytime Phone Number Registration includes: Admission ticket and one complimcntar3.' beverage tickct for thc Opening Reception: ticket to Advocacy Brcakfi~st/Lcgislativc Briefing Session; Registration Packet including all lobbying materials Re[,,istratiotz for ll"orkshops are separate. Register by fax: Send thc registration form to fax # (850) 921-0150 and mail check. Payment must bc rccci~,'cd before March 20, 1998. Florida Trust Member ti Vis:t/MasterCard # Exp. Date Signature No registrations will be refunded after March 20. 1998. SubstitutiOn. of registrants may be allowed upon written notification to he Florida Trust prior to March 20, 1998. Your ch~Ck'is )'our, confirmation..'. " "':'"":"': ...... " ' Questions?.',.C_all the Florida Trust, (850) 224- 1281 ' '" ....... ' ' '" '" Please mail .Registration Form and payment to: The Florida Trust for llistorlc Preser-,'ation P.O. Box 11206 Tallahassee, Florlda 32302 Fax: (850)921-0150 ' ' HISTORIC P,, RESERVATION DAY WORKSHOPS MARCH 30-APRIL 1' 1998 i "I. Secretfiry of Interior's Stan~tards War '14shop, Ta!lahas,se~" ..... 500 S. Bronough Street, Ground Floor, Education Room, Tallahas~ce '-:'.. · Rcgis. tration Fees $25 Florida Trust Florida Forum Member,.'.: ::. :~'~. · $35 Florida Trust General Mcmbe'r " " $70 Non Member (includes general membership to Florida Trust) ~ . Late Fees: Please add $10 late fee if sent afierMa)ch 20. 1998. This workshop will explain federal programs available for' histm:i& preservation projects, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards for Rehabilitation, and the .design guidelines required, for these projects.. There are hvo programs .which many prcservationists are unfamiliar: The first is the federal tax incentive program v;hich awards thc owner/rehabilitator of an historic building a credit of 20% of the oostofa building's rehabilitation to be applied to the owner's federal tax liabilits'. The second program is a review "Section 106" (of the Historic Preservation Act of 1966) which is applied to all structures or landscapes listdd on the National Register or ones that ma}' be eligible for such listing which are affected by projects using federal funding, wholly or in part. The curriculum will explain how these programs work; the Secretary's Standards, (which mus; be full5' understood to do this type of work); specification ;~Titing; and sources of materials. Participants will learn how these two programs operate, how to assist thc applicant in filling out the required forms, and how to work with and interpret the Secretary of the Interior's Standards· This program meets AIMCES Quality Level 2 criteria. Participimts ',~AII receive 8 LU's. This program is worth 4 contact hours. II. Stewardship/Easements 101, Tallahassee Tuesday, April 1, 1998 500 S. Bronough Street, Ground Floor, Education Room, Tallahassce Registration 12:30 P.M. \Vorkshop 1:00 - 5:00 P.M. Registration Fccs $25 Florida Trust Florida Forum Member $35 Florida Trust General Member $70 Non Member (includes general membership to Florida Trust) Late Fees: Please add S10 late fee ff sent after March 27, 1998. \Vhat is an easement and how will it benefit preservation organizations and property owners alike? How do you define what to protect? The subjects of Easements and Stewardship often involve complex issues and numerous questions. A representative from the National Trust for Historic General Counsel will give participants a solid working knowledge of these issues', how they work, how they arc connected, and how they can benefit you. Also, a Model Historic Prcser4'ation Easement will be presented. The second speaker, Tom Saundcrs, Planning Director for thc City ~,f Gainesville, formerly of the Mary'land Trust will present case studies on various components of the Mary'land Trust's Easement and Stewardship programs. REGISTRATION i:.~' 'i:.~,![i?''''':' ' Wor 'kshops D~fi'e in ConjUnction With ltistoric Preservation Day 1998. ' c;3'7." ::.. ' ."~:':~ ,>¢,,:,i't-;.,'z .'~3 '- ' -. ." ". , · - ~' -~::'.'.: .... ' ' - ., l_,"?,~?;.::,..-!,;-.. . - - ' .... - ', ~.~ ;'. .... , : · , , : .... '- - ' ';: .'""t' · ":,, - ..... '~- .- l.,~,~q,,.~..';.. :., ,, - ,.. .... ,. ,, , ..~.,:., , , , .~ .;' ., - . .. ,. , -...'. ~., .-..,.... . . ,.., , .' ,. ,. '~..'i!:~:.":.:'::.: ':' '? ,:'.'.- ..' .:.:"7;:' .:.'~" ,e:,.,. ' ..... ;~'.-'" ', , ,: , ..' .," ~, ...... ,',~JC~,-',%-. '.' · ' ~." ' · ,: . ' -'- '. ~h'~4'.~? .... :'~ .'. '- .'. :-'.:, '~-.',',~'-"- ,' ...... ., ." " '-' :.:','.'v' ,';'--.'~,:. "~ .' ..... '.'. ' '~' '' .' i:~;..&.~..,.~.,.,.,.,_...... _..._ ....,.,.. ,..., ,.,.. . .... . .... ........ .... .,.-.,.-, ..,: ,...<.-.....;,...~.....,: ........ ....~ .:.. ~,.. :.,~: ,:~: .:~.,::' please check thc worl~shop yOU would like to attend:" ";, ;',.: "~j'.>'...!'.::,...'.:: .".: · . .:'...: .' - ': :' ,. '.'. i,~..;,.: '~" '" ' - "-"'' t" " .... '-" ';" ';' ~' :' ; .... ' ' ' - ' ..... ~'" ""- "' .'~;C .... "' '" '' ' ............................ March 30, 1998 - Secretary of Interior's Standards Workshopl Tallahassee -. :i':~:',.: '.~'... April 1, 1998 ' Stewardship/Easements 101 , Tallahassee .... . .....'"' " ' ~ '-' .!t s 4b,'-*?.' ..''- , - . . · t:.,, '. ..,., . . : ,:. ... . . . ' $25 Florida Trust FloridaF_._m Member ' "" ' ' '- .... ,, .. , $35 Florida Trusi General Member -. · '.' $70 Non Member (include~; general membership to Florida Trust .' Late t.'ces: Please add $10 late fee i. f sent after March 20, 1998. NAME: FIRM/ORG: Al)DRESS: CITY/STATE/ZIP: PIIONE/4: VISA/MASTERCARD #: SIGNATURE: EXP. DATE: TOTAL AMOUNT ENCLOSED: Please return with payment to: Thc Florida Trust for llistoric Prcscr~'ation Post Office Box 11206 Tallahassee, Florida 32302 Phone (850) 224-8128 · Fax (850) 9214)150 .... · . .. . , . , : --~..~:;..;.~.. . . · .. . ~/,t.~c. Cc,, ,~. C~)LLIER COUNTY LANDFILL & MATERIALS RECOVERY FACILITY · ~-"- CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE Item!! /~. (..~--?. DECEMBER 11, 1997 MEETING MINUTES Copies To: Present: David Addison Tim Constantine Tom Henning Jon Staiger Nancy Bisbee Brad Co~ell Barbara Jenkins Fran Stallings David Carpenter Michael Delate Russell Priddy Staff Liaison: David Russell Dufresne-Henry Team: Bill Bates, P.E., Klm Boyd, APRP, Dick Michael, P.E. J. W. Spear, P.E., David Wilkison, P.E., Absent: Jim Stewart Meeting was called to order at 4:07 P.m. by the CAC Committee Chairperson Tim Constantine. The chairman provided the audience with a review of the events and CAC efforts that have taken place to date and stated public comment will be held at the end of the meeting. II. Chairman Constantine introduced the CAC Committee and the Dufresne-Henry, Inc., Team and presented an outline on the topics for discussion during the meeting. Russell Priddy moved that the CAC meeting minutes from their meeting held on November 19, 1997, be approved. Nancy Bisbee seconded the motion and the minutes were approved. Russell Pridd'y asked to that public comment be first on the meeting agenda. III. Public comment session held at approximately 4:45 p.m. Commcnt~; by Al Perkins · Fixthe problem IV. Jo Spear presented addendum to Tech Memo No. 5. He reviewed the following items: a) Purpose of the meeting; · Distribution of Tech Memo No. 5 addendum; · Announcement of the Collier County Board of County Commissioner's meeting for final recommendation; · Reviewed the number and location of public information meeting schedule; Nor r t s /~/'/ 1 Hanc~k '~ /~ac '~: fe ~- Berr.~ ~~ b) c) e) g) h) i) J) · 16G 2, · Reviewed landfill construction or capital cost estimates with CAC; need only be concerned with capital cost, not operating cost; · Review evaluative criterion regarding cost as basis for ranking/methodology (EV-22) - we're only using cost as a comparison of potential sites; · Reviewed Exhibit 2 (page 3 o£addendum). Russell Priddy wants an oranges to oranges comparison of these 3 sites from either David Russell or Tim Constantine, As a citizen he feels he needs an answer regarding costs. Dave Carpenter stated that the purpose of the committee was to ide,'ltify the best landfill sites for the next 50 years under present day technolo~'. Jo Spear presented the overhead of advantages versus constraints for each site from the Draft Final Report. Comment was opened to the CAC committee members to offer their pro and con comparisons. Ail committee members agreed with Site A disadvantages. Russell Priddy moved to accept Site A attributes as they appear in the Final Report. A unanimous motion was carried. He also motioned to accept all advantages - Exhibit 8-4 to Sites A, L & U. David Addison seconded the motion and a unanimous motion was carried. Dave Carpenter does 'not want this Exhibit going to the Commissioners, stating that it's a "cheap" way to rank the sites and that it does not mention trucks hauling through Immokalee. Jo Spear clarified that hauling through a specific location was never a criteria. Russell Priddy questioned the methodology of the table. Jo Spear explained result of site investigation not just a subset. Jo Spear offered to look at the other desk top criteria and add to this table. Tom Henning - Site L: 8-EV Wetland Vegetation Cover - all sites have less than 50 acres of wetlands impact; Questions 20-EV, which is distance to Bird Rookeries. L-2.1 miles; A-Il miles, and U-7 miles. The committee wants to include the measurements within criteria in the Final Report. Tom Henning - Site U: remove 8-EV (Wetland Vegetation Cover) from all site comparison. Brad Cornell wants to keep in with #5; address permitting issue in Final Report; .clearly indicate that some criteria do not show up on each site. 2 k) Russell Priddy made a motion to accept ail'development constraints as listed to Sites A, L & U with addition of Measurement//5. V. Tim Constantine took a 2 minute break, upon return he opened the meeting to public comment again, however, there was no comment from the public. VI. Jo Spear addresses what will be the Final Report. .- a) Dave Carpenter: Site A - concern regarding hauling. Site U - 951/41 intersection and dislikes being that far south and proximity to the Everglades and Rookery Bay. Site L - likes location and far from Orange Tree Subdivision - likes this site the best regarding strategic location o£it. b) c) Barbara Jenkins: Concern for something residents beyond 500' buffer or within some specified distance. Can they be compensated in some way for problems that may occur? Dr. Fran Stallings: No perfect sites but a lot of work. This is best we can do and hopes that the BCC will accept work and select a site. d) Tom Henning: Site A - regarding hauling 1-75/S.R. 82 could go that way. All sites are near major arterial roads - no difference. Russell Priddy mentioned that the route goes through Lee County within 5 miles of incinerator. e) Nancy Bisbee: Not happy with any of them. Site L would be her choice, but not unhappy with selection process. f) David Addison: Comfortable with selection, process, agrees with Dave Carpenter's comments. Is bothered by impact on citrus. g) Mike Delate: concern with Site U and urban growth - too close for future residential areas. Site U relatively frost-free site and does not want to impact. h) Jon Staiger: Not fond of any of the sites. Concern regarding impact on agriculture. Traffic through Immokalee and Orange Tree development. Impact on population in East Naples area regarding to Site U. Potential of agriculture land overextends time period - cost astronomical of what would be taken out of the county. Site U - lower value due to row crop vs. citrus and money into it, but more jobs conversely. Impact to people at Site L. Does not want to pick any one site. i) J) k) m) n) o) P) q) r) Tim Constantine: Agriculture cost to pull from production. Wanted to point out the phasing of impact if any; hauling and truck traffic is a factor. Impacts Site A more than others; consideration of transportation. Site A has been mentioned as option; agrees with Mike Delate regarding environmental impact. Site U - strong concerns; David Carpenter mentioned US 41/C.R. 951 intersection, which does not concern him as much as S.R. 29. Is comfortable with three sites. Brad Corneil: Concurs with Site U - not a likely place due to environmental concerns. Site A - does seem objectionable due to impact on downtown [mmokalee. Site L - is best of three but concerned regarding proximity to Corkscrew, citrus and residents. Confident in procesz and that it has given us Site L. Wants narrative to convey committee's concerns, doesn't like any and issues regarding current landfill site. Russell Priddy: Does not like any of the sites. Comfortable with process. Dr. Fran Stallings - comment regarding agriculture and preservation; but agriculture community does not want to give up agfiCuiture because they want to roll over to development and not be concerned with agriculture. Russell Priddy cited land fights issue. Tim Constantine - cites agriculture is choosing to give up to development. Not that agriculture can not withstand. Jon Staiger elaborated on the agriculture issue. Much of what's being converted are fallow; however, the sites we're looking at are productive and financially viable (Tim Constantine pointed out the phasing over 50 years). Jo Spear suggested making recommendation to the BCC that property within the buffer be made available to landowner for use in perpetuity. David Carpenter - agriculture issue has been blown out of proportion - look at 50 years, no statistics to support agricultural view point. Tim Constantine cited that the charge of the committee was to select a site. Russell Priddy has agreed with process; past research has been done and will be looking at hauling. He also disagrees with his statement regarding public sentiments. 4 s) Russell P?iddy made a motion to recommend that the committee state no site can be located and that the Bce should long range plan for hauling outside of the County. Russell Priddy read his pre-prepared motion. Priddy and Addison ,,,,'ere for the motion, however it failed 2-8. A discussion was held. Motion is attached to these minutes. Jo Spear asked the committee if they believe that they have come to end of their charge and have identified the sites. David Carpenter feels we have exhausted our resources and that the sites have been identified. All agreed. Jo Spear then asked again if each member felt their charge had been met and appropriately completed, identifying 3 sites for Collier County's future landfill: Mr. Carpenter, Yes; Ms. Jenkins. Yes; Mr. Stallings, Yes; Mr. Henning, Yes; Ms. Bisbee, Yes; Mr. Addison, Yes; Mr. Delate, Yes; Mr. Staiger, Yes; Chairman Constantine, Yes; Mr. Cornell, Yes; Mr. Priddy, Yes. Jo Spear then asked if they felt the same about their work as a committee and received unanimous agreement. Jo Spear then presented the Final Statement. Dr. Fran Stalling accepted the motion as written, Jon Staiger seconded the motion and it was accepted. t) Public comment made by Dr. Stokes: Has stressed siting landfill somewhere; but also suggested you may not be able to site one in the County. But either way, transportation problem remains the same. In 5 years we will have the technology that wil~ do away x¥ith landfills as we know them; can build materials recovery to reduce to 15% - 20% inert transportation to landfill. We should insert this option in committee's' recommendation to Bce, this may reduce objections. Agrees with David Carpenter assessment of Agricultiare loss; County now has a bargain with regard to. handling our waste. u) Jo Spear asked the committee to approve-the Final Report as is with a review of Section 8 with narrative to include comments with cover transmittal letter from chairman reflecting sentiment of committee members as noted. Committee accepted the report with additions as discussed. VII.The meeting was adjourned at approximately 6:30 p.m. Attachment: Russell Priddy Statement & Motion a: Landfill Disk #3/cacmin.'l 2-11-97.doc 5 DEC~-12-97 08:41 AM BOYD~..CO. 941 :263 245~ P.07 4-' ~'~0 .16 On April 25, 1995 the BCC agreed to form a committee of citizens to find a site in Collier County suitable for the relocation of the land. fill. Early on we developed a ranking criteria of factors we felt were important to address. These factors included proximity to residential areas, enviro.nmental issues and cost, to name a few. We have met regularly over a two year period at various locations throughout the county to listen to presentations by the consultants, and hear public comments. . After applying the ranking criteria to over 46 sites, three sites were ultimately chosen for final review. Tech Memo 5 addresses those three sites but there is no ringing endorsement or affirmative conclusion that any of those sites would be an ideal location foe a landfill. Additionally, from the very beginning, public opinion has been overwhelmingly against moving the landfill to any location in our community (other than a single site owned by a willing seller). At: every meeting, members of the public have voiced concerns about moving a "problem" from one location in Collier County to another. The only conclusion that this committee can come to is that there is no site in Collier County suitable for a landfill. Solid waste from Collier County should be taken to a site outside our community for disposal. I would like to make the following motion: It is the recommendation of the CAC to the County Commission that a siie for another landfill in Collier County not be selected. The CAC process has developed a criteria that has selected three sites If these three sites are to be considered the most suitable sites, then, havin~g reviewed the sites, weighed the public input through the process, and considered the environmental sensitivity of our County, we have determined there is no suitable site in Collier County for another landfill. We further recommend that instead of selecting a site in Collier County to relocate the landfill, the Board of County Commissioners develop a long range plan for trash disposal that does not include another landfill in Collier County. Loly Golf Estato$ Beautification Advisory Committee Minutes - Meeting of January 9, 1998 SUMMARY OF MOTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4. Minutes of December 12, 1997: Bob Cole moved to accept the minutes as presented; seconded by Al LePain and carried unanimously. b~isc. Cortes: I / ~' Date: Hanc~k _ Cons. tant~ne_ - 1 6G,.-. 2 Lely Golf Estates Beautification Advisory Committee Minutes - Meeting of January 9, 1998 Meeting called to order at 4:00 p.m. Location -Facilities Management, Conference Room 111. Attendance Taken: Present: George Pearson, Al LePain, Robert Cole, members; Val Prince, Transportation Administrative Services; Mike McGee, McGee & Associates; Paul Duguay and Ken Ball, Advanced Lawn and Landscaping; Jacqueline Silano, secretary. Absent: Robert Weyers, member. Minutes of December 12, 1997: Bob Cole moved to accept the minutes as presented; seconded by Al LePain and carried unanimously. 5. LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE REPORT A. Paul Duguay advised of changes in personnel and introduced Ken Ball who will be supervising the project. B. Ken advised that he started trimming and cleaning up the weeds yesterday; Top Notch sprayed last week and will returning next week. Mike McGee reiterated the need for prevention. Paul noted that Top Notch is on a 30-day notice regarding their performance. C. Rat traps have been set out in an attempt to resolve the problem. 6. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S REPORT A. Mike McGee distributed the December Quarterly Maintenance Report which was reviewed. Bob Cole noted that the monuments a~ Baltusrol and the cul de sacs have not been mulched. Two more pallets are expected. B. Mike asked Bill Confroy, the irrigation contractor, to provide a cover for the valve. 7. TRANSPORTATION SERVICES REPORT A. Val Prince advised the committee of Steve Fabiano's resignation and distributed copies of a letter from him. B. Val requested that Steve Carnell of the Purchasing Department receive copies of the monthly minutes and Mike McGee's report. C. Val distributed draft copies of the Executive Summary requesting the Board recognize, approve and appropriate a portion ($13,200) of Fund 152 reserves for additional maintenance services. A budget amendment will be done upon approval. Copies of the Budget Status dated January, 1998 were distributed and reviewed. Val advised that the carry forward will be recognized in February and will be reflected in the March statement. Next year's budget will be discussed then. .8. OLD BUSINESS A. Apparently the Lely Civic Association is not willing to refurbish the signs on the U.S. 41 entrance monuments. After some discussion, the committee decided to postpone any improvements to the monuments at this time. B. George advised that the proposed affluent line was surveyed today in preparation of the jack and bore work. Val advised that a portion of the sidewalk would have to be removed and repaired. George will meet again with Tim Clemmons to follow up. He will also submit something in writing with copies to Messrs. Bobanik and Ilschner. As there was no further business to discuss, the meeting was adjourned at 5:15 p.m. The next meeting has been scheduled for February 13, 1998 at 4:00 p.m. in the Facilities Management Conference Room 111. 2. 3. 4. ^~ettt:[a - ne' t.tt catio t visory Meeti~ of Febrt~ary Meeting called to order Attendance Approval of minutes of January 9, 1998 Reports A B. C. Do Advanced Lawn & Lanctscape Transportation Administrative Services New Cor~slruclion i. Mike McGee, McGee & Associates Committee Members i. George Pearson ii. Al LePain iii. Robert Cole iv. Robert Weyers 5. Oki Business 6. New Business 7. Adjournment co,t,tittee 1998 NEXT MEETING: March 13, 1998 2 Naples, Florida, January 28, 1998 LET IT BE KNOWN, that the LIBRARY ADVISORY BOARD met on this date in regular session at 2:05 p.m. in the Main Library with the following members present: VICE-CHAIR: Jaculyn Dering Sabina Musci Doris Lewis Absent: Syd Mellinger Diane Williams ALSO PRESENT: John W. Jones, Library Director Frank Cullen, President, Friends of the Library Marilyn Matthes, Assistant Director Luz Pietri, Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES REPORTS OF OFFICERS - None COMMUNICATIONS - None Mrs. Dering asked for comments or corrections to the minutes of December 17, 1997. There being none, Mrs. Lewis moved, seconded by Ms. Musci and carried unanimously, that the minutes be approved as submitted. ~;:' ~" {:: '~"::' I ,.'~ UNFINISHED BUSINESS In reference to the Marco Island Branch building status, Mr. Jones reported that irt about 10 days the building will be turned over to the Norr ~ s.. Hancock . Constantine, V/ . - Nac'Kle Berry __ 16G 2 In reference to the Marco Island Branch building status, Mr. Jones reported that in about I0 days the building will be turned over to the County. A dedication will take place at the end of March. He also reported that the Calusa Garden Club had donated $500 for plants. Thc Friends of the Library also donated annuals. In reference to the Regional Library planning, Mr. Jones stated that the preferred site is still being negotiated. The Board reviewed lire nominations submitted for the selection of the Library's Employee of the Month. Mrs. Lewis moved, seconded by Ms. Musci and carried unanimously, to select Carol Travis as Employee of tire Month for January 1998. In reference to the lnternet, Mrs. Matthes handed out copies of comments from patrons; most of them still want graphics. NEW BUSINESS A Proclamation honoring Betsy Gaw for over 20 years of service to the County was presented to the Board for approval. Ms. Musci moved, seconded by Mrs. Lewis and carried unanimously, to approve the proclamation as submitted. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS - None DIRECTOR'S REPORT In addition to his report, Mr. Jones stated that a fluent Spanish-speaking person has been hired for the Immokalee Branch. Now Spanish- speaking staffare well represented at the Immokalee, Estates and Itcadquarters libraries. 2 REPORT OF THE FRIENDS Mr. Cullen reported that there will be a change of administration of the Art Gallery in the West Wing of the Main Library. The Arts Committee of the Friends of the Library will be in charge of the project as of April 1st. He also reported that one more issue of the newsletter is coming up. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Library Advisory Board, Mrs. Lewis moved, seconded by Ms. Musci and carried unanimously, that the meeting be adjourned. Time: 2:45 p.m. DIRECTOR'S REPORT January 21, 1998 Marco Island This project should be completed by mid-February. While not everything will be in place, we will attempt to open for public use in early March. Northern Regional We have not yet secured property for this facility. Most owners in the target area are unwilling to sell or the cost per acre is prohibitive. Booksale The next book sale is scheduled for late February. This sale is normally held in March, however, due to the "Festival" and thc Public Library Association meeting, no March date was available. Merit Raises The second group of merit raises have been awarded. $1,000.00 Category: Mike Widner, Systems Manager Alison Saba, Reference Librarian $500.00 Category: Luz Pietfi, Sr. Secretary Barbara Nichols, Library Assistant I Barbara DeSmet, Library Assistant I Circulation Our system-wide circulation remains stable. We are not showing large gains due to an expected drop of about 6,000 items per month from Marco. Staff At present we have several professional vacancies. We are actively seeking two children's librarians and one reference librarian. I ! I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I Const~ntSne~ 166 PARKS & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD , .~~~.. D~to:_ 't' " Cop'es To: WED{NE,~D/~Y, J~INI2/~RY 28. 1998 ~T ~fiRi~HLTHRE ~ EXTENfiiO~ 2:OO P.M. 147OO IMMOK~kEE RO~D, ~fiP~E$, FLORIDfi 2 I'/%RK,~ PtND RE(~RE~TIO1N /~I)Vh~OI;~Y BO/'TRD lanuary 2b~, 1998 'l'l~e I':irl, s :tnd I{ccrcalion .\dxisn,'x thmr(! met'tin~ s\ ill hr held xxe~lnestl:,~..l:;nu:trx I'tm'ida. I. ( ~l,I, I()()III)I,R: II. I'1EI)(,I'.(II ~,1,1E(;li\( I. I() IlII.~F'I ~.(;: II'J. IX/()('/ll¢)\: Ii. \i'1'1,I¢)/ II.()l' '~11\1 IIi.'",. X,x,..mhcr I0 I~)O'''Hcclm~ '~ · I)t'ct'ffll)ur "k,,linHle,, - \() _()ll,'ll fllll I'-r (li,,cttsshm I j.4 X I. I\ I i{()1)1 ("!'1()\: \t.v~ Ihulrd IllUllll!,~.'r- .Iol,m \II. IX/ ~,1{I) I'I{IiSI':\i ~11()\: I. I'l;Iquv I"rt'st'nl;llmft~ . (;;t',,h' ". /llillldl' iXX:ll(I - I);I'V~II I)ml:c. I'r,,.,r;,m I.t';ll. Jt.r Il · {. X, tlilmJc X~;~r(I - .hdm \ vii. ( f't'~x I.r;i(h'r 1. /,.,,ricullure (;;ir(h.n I'rt',,cnl:ilh.i - I)cnise 2. I';h'clbm.f' \r- \ II. I{t';01 I':~ I,X I'()1{ I)l.S('l S.".1()% - .~i~!'.('11"i(' ! I'l)'tl'l'; I'1'i';'~1 \ Ill, I{l'ii'()l{ I~,'l t'1) '~ ('2l ('22 I)23 l)24 IX,..~,i).l()l A 16G I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD December 17, 1997 NO QUORUM November 19~ 1998 Minutes Golden Gate Community Park 3300 Santa Barbara Boulevard, Naples, Florida PRESENT: Timothy Blackford, Chairman Daphnie Bercher Gil Mueller ABSENT: Joseph Zaks Billie Cheney Elaine Wicks, Vice Chair Gayle L. Stan Al,SO PRESENT: Maria Ramsey, Director Murdo Smith, Recreation Manager Gary Franco, Parks Superintendent Jacquie llart, Secretary !i John Dunnuck, Operations Coordinator Ginger llinchcliff John Grice Kent Kolegne I. CALl, TO ORDER: The meeting was cancel at 3:I0 p.m - NO QUORUM il. PI,EDGE OF AIA,EGIANCE TO Tile FI,AG Ill. INVOCATION: IV. APPROVAl. OF MINUTES: No approval lbr Novembers Minutes. Chairman Tim Blackford cancel the Parks and Recreation Adviso~ Board Meeting because there was not a quorum for discussion. The next meeting will be held on January 28, 1998 at the Agwicuiture building. I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I I II ....... III - - IIIII ................. I PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD November 19, 1997 Minutes (;olden (;ate Communi .ty Park 3300 Santa Barbara Boulevard, Naples, Florida PRESENT: Timothy Black(oral, Chairman Joseph Zaks Billie Chency l)aphnie Bercher Elaine Wicks, Vice Chair Gayle L. Stan (;il Mucller ABSENT: ALSO PRESENT: Maria Ramsey, Director Murdo Smith, Recreation Manager (;ar)' Franco, Parks Superintendent .lacquie Hart, Secretar)' !I John Dunnuek, Operations Coordinator Ginger Hinchcliff .lohn Grice Kent Kolegue I. CALL TO ORDER: Thc meeting was called to order at 2:10 pm. II. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG II1. INVOCATION: by Jacquie Hart IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: October 22, 1997 meeting. Mr. Muellcr stated that on page i and 2 the minutes '`','crc complete but on page 3 the minutes ',','crc brief. Mr. Mueller stated that some of the board members said much more on the subjects than transcribed on page 3. Mr. Mueller stated that he ',','as not sure whether the procedures for typing the minutes were to tot,ch on highlights or how specific should the minutes be. Mr. Mueller inquired what are the procedures for typing the minutes? Chairman Blackford stated ti'mt the minutes at one time were verbatim and thc board got away from that and requested that the minutes be condensed. Mr. Muellcr stated the minutes are too brief. Mr. Mueller stated that Ms. \Vicks and Mr. Zaks comments ',','ere more than three (3) lines. In Mr. I m m m m m m m ! m ! m ! m m m m ! m 165 2 Mt,cllcr's case Tigcrtail Tragedy discussion tlncrc is only two (2) lines and Nit. Muellcr stated that be recall talking for about 4 to 5 minutes on tile subject. glr. Zaks stated that he thought tile minutes were short, concise and made important points. Mr. Zaks suggested tlnat if the board feels strongly that a particular subject should be included in more dclails than this to please stat,: so on tlmt particular subject for the future. Mr. Mucllcr stated ti'mt thc Board of County Commissioners and others read tile nfint,tes and it would be good it' they are ay:are of v,'Inat is being discussed. Motion by ,Joe Zaks that the October 22, 1997, minutes be approved prepared and amended by including a ','erbatim discussion on 'l'igert;iil Tragedy. Seconded by Tim Blackford. Passed 7/0. Tigertail Tragedy - Mr. Mucllcr stated ti'mt a tragedy occurred at Tigertail Beach. /'vls. Rarnscv indicated that additional signaue ,.,.'ill be installed by tile County. Mr. Mucllcr stated that people should take responsibilities for their own actions. Thc county can not install signs in all different languages for people that utilized the facilities. v. AWARI) PRESENTATION: Chaimmn Blackford presented Janice Eiliott and Bret Popma with an Attitude Award and congratulated them. VI. INTI,IOI)UCTION: VII. NEW IIUSINESS/PRESENTATIONS a. Interview fl~r Parab Position - Interview #1 .lohn Grice - Nit. John Grice stated that Ine would like to get involved in community activities and to get to know people. Mr. Grice is a Realtor and would like to get thmiliar with tile community. Mr. Gricc has lived in Collier County since 1994. Mr. Mucllcr stated that one of thc major concerns of tile Park and Recreation Board is attendance. There has been a case where individuals attended one meeting and never attended again. Mr. Mucllcr stated that its very important because PARAB needs a quorum to have a meeting. Mr. Mueller stated that personally he would ,,,,'ant a commitment from Mr. Grice as far as attending the meetings. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ................... IIII ................ 166 2 Mr. (;rice stated that il' Mr. Muellcr looks at his resume he ',','ill noticed that he is the Chaim'm of the/\meh, zs Committee and having CMired tile committee he understond exactly what is been said. Interview tt2 Ginger llinchcliff- Ms. llinchclifl' stated that currently she works for the Deparlment of Environmental Protection at Rookery Bay and has been the Director of Education since 1990. Ms. Ilinchcliffhas lived in the County si,icc the carl)))' 80's. Ms. l linchcliff is eager to participate in more community activities and is particularl)' interested in the Parks and Recreation Department because that's what she has a degree in from Penn State University. Ms. llinchcliff has done a lot,of work in national parks and would like to get involved with community parks. Ms. l linchcliff has been using the Community Park syslcm Ibr several years and feels that its a quality lilk issue in Collier County. Ms. l linchclift's tonnages approximately I I 0.000 acres of aquatic reserves and resources. Ms. I l inchcli ff utilizes the aquatic facility at Golden Gate which she finds very attractive and also uses the boat ramps at Cocohatchee River Park. Mr. Zaks inquired what Ms. ltinchcliff tbund least attractive. Ms. t linchcliff stated that tile count)' does a good job and at this time she did not find anything least attractive. Ms. |linchcliff indicated dmt she is a tirnely person and has checked with her superior to make sure she is able to attend the meetings ever)' month. Interview 113 - Kent Kolegue - Mr. Kolegue stated that he applied lbr II'~e PARAB due to previous involvement with the Golden Gate Comn'mnitv Center Advisory Board. Mr. Kolegue's reason lbr wanting to be on the board is to continue to see that all the Parks and Recreation get properly ft, nded and to continue xvith improvemer~ts. Mr. Kolegue is married with three (3) children and his children utilize the parks programs. Interview #4 - Gavle Stan - Mr. Mucller asked Ms. Stan what is her feelings ;vith regards to attendance. Ms. Start responded that sim had been on the board for 19 n'mnths and cmly missed one meeting. I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. Zaks inqt, ired what did Ms. Stan view as an accomplishment during her venue on the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board. Ms. Start stated the Copeland Playground. Ms. Stan saw tile need and lbllowed through with tile request for a playground. This was tile first project Ms. Slan actually saw from beginning to end. All the other projects such as Sugden Regional Park are still being worked on. Ms. Start biggest disappointment was the lack of nloney and tile restriction on all Neighborhood Parks. Ms. Start stated that as lhe County grows bigger and tile roads expand there will be more need for Neighborhood Parks. Interview/t5 Timothy Blackford - Mr. Muellcr inquired why Nlr. lilackford thinks hc is qualilicd for tile I'AR/,,B position. Mr. Blackford stated that when he first applied with tile board he may have had difficulty in answering tile question. Its has been five (5} years now since Mr. lllackford has been on the board and its thc on thc job experience that makes him qualified. Nlr. Mucllcr stated that Nit. Blackford had a good record ,qf attendance also. Xlr. l~,lackford slated that thc St,gden Regional Park v, ould bc tile biggest accomplishment and a state of the art park facility, glr. Blackford biggest disappointment is tile Beach l'arking permit as I~AP, AB voted tmanimously in favor of instituting beach parking and then it was taken away by tile Commission. 'rile department wen! through a couple of years not charging and then it came back tt'} were a charge was reinstituted. Nlr. Blackford stated that recently the Board of County Commission has put a lot more emphasis on tile Parks and Recreation Advisory Board recommendation. A sheet of paper was distributed to all PARAB members. Fach member ranked the inten'iewers from I-5. Listing the top person from I and tile lowest rank as 5. Mr. Blackford was ranked #1 IMs. Ginger Hinchcliff was ranked Mr. Kent Kolegue was ranked//3. Mr. John Grice was ranked #4. and Gayle Start was ranked '~5. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I Motion by Mr. Zaks that Parks and Recrealion Advisoo' Board recommend Timothy Blackford and Ginger llinchcliff for the i'ARAII position. VI. RI.:QUEST FOlk DISCUSSION/SPECIFIC UPDATE ITEM a. Tree Dedication Video Presentation - Ms. l lasse stated that tile video being presented was a Tree Dedication at thc Max Hasse Jr.. Comnmnity Park. The video showed tile ceremony and the different organization Max Hasse Jr. represented. Each member of each organization shoveled mulch around the tree. Tree Planting - Mr. Zaks suggested ti'mt the Parks and Recreati~m l)epartment plant trees around the playground area for shading. Mr. Zaks stated thai tile department should contact some of tile banks who would be willing to donate some money towards trees or landscaping of the park. Ms. Ramscv slated that Gan' Franco has approximately $200.000 in his budget for landscaping and also the Leisure Line has a tree planting program. An individual could buy a tree and the Parks Maintenance section would plant the tree at the suggested park and a .gtaque would be [,laced at the tree. Mr. Mueller also stated that he had donated a tree at the Tigertail Beach Park. Ms. Start suggested that tile department advertise on the government channel regarding tree donations because some people do not read the Leisure Line. Mr. Smith stated that staff was working on a pamphlet outlining tree donntions. Public Forum - A public forum will be held at tile St. John's Cht, rch. November 25. 1997 next Tuesday at 7:00 p.m. Ms. Ramsey ,,,,'ill be presenting the Bluebill Property Beach Parking Plan and Commissioner ltancock will also be in attendance. Ms. Ramsey ,,,,'ill be discussing the trolley, parking spaces, walking way. picnic pavilion and playground area. There ~vill be a parking meter installed and a trolley will transport individuals to the State Park. I d. Summary Sheet - Chairman Blackford requested a summan.' sheet i on all park related items discussed at the Board of County Commission meeting. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Mr. John Dunnuck ,.','ill prepare a recap for the next meeting. Sunshine Ace Corp.- Fitness Center Membership - Ms. Stan stated that the Manager of Sunshine Ace who recently got a membership for tile Fitness Center stated that the Fitness Center is wonderful and they currently have 12 employees enrolled. Vll. REPORTS & UPDATES Monthly Report (October) - A discussion took place regarding thc October monthly report. Mr. Mueller inquired what did VYCP and VTCP mean. Mr. Smith stated that (VYCP) meant Vineyards Community Park and the other is Veterans Community Park Mr. Mucllcr inquired why is it that East Naples is showing that the Facility User arc over 58,000 and the revenue is only twenty three hundred ($2.300) dollars. It was explained that the users would use the basket bail court, soccer field, playground area. and not use thc paid programs such as aficrshool. or other classes. Beach Fee - Mr. Mueller stated that two meetings ago a discussion took place regarding charging a minimal fee of $5.00 to process a beach parking permit. Mr. Mueller suggested that it would be a good idea to raise the beach parking tee instead of charging a $5.00 beach sticker fee. Su.eden Regional Park Status - ]'he restroom and offices arc being installed. The due date for completion is June 6, 1998. South Park- The top 3 proposals were chosen. The companies are Wilson Miller. Post Buckley. and Hole Montes & Associates. ,5, selection committee ,,','ill select the top firm from these 3. Ms. Ramsey stated in 8 months there will be a design for construction North Naples Regional Park - Ms. Ramsey stated that the Real Property Department has submitted a potential list of properties ~br a regional park location. A committee will be Ibrmcd to review these locations. Adopt-A-Park Report - Ms. Start visited Cocohatchee River l'ark there has not been much activity at thc park. Ms. Stan also visited Lely l~arefoot and thc guard house is still there. Mr. Zaks thanked the Parks and Recreation Department for assisting with Christmas in Immokalee. Snowfest - Snowfcst will bc held at the Golden Gate Community Park on December 6, 1997. Mr. Smith stated that this is the time of the ye,:r that the Parks and Recreation Department will bring 40 tons of snow ;n fi~r the kids. VIP passes and T-shirts will be mailed to PAR..\B members. h, PARAB Meeting Schedule - The next meeting will be held at the (Jolden Gate Community Park. 3300 Santa Barbara Boulevard, Naples. Florida. December 17. 1997 at 2:00 p.m.. VIII. AI),IOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 4:30 P.M.. Motion by .loseph Zaky to adjourn. Seconded by Daphnie Bercher. Passed 7/0. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I m m ! COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT RECREATION MONTHLY REPORT NOVEMBER '1997 1.6G 2 m PARK/FACILITY USERS I t REVENUE CURRENT YEAR PRIOR YEAR I CURRENT YEAR PRIOR YEAR FACILITY MTH YTD MTH YTD! MTH YTD MTH YTD' GG AQUATIC 1,152 6,772 2,213 5,473 4,107 11,031 3,123 6,63t GG FITNESS 2,947 5,828 1,804 3,877 8,663 19,166 3.912 9.479 EAST NAPLES 49,982 108,703 56,253 111,328 3,012 5,352 3.773 6627 FRANK MACKLE 12,920 25,840 19,309 37,613 5.707 11,634 5,131 8.788 GG COMM CTR 23,400 44,884 7,708 24,302 7,650 20,528 3,842 15.440 VETERANS CP 47,426 85,317 27,997 51,539 5.602 18,910 7,981 20.306 VINEYARDS CP 48,06,,3 101,061 56,592 95,270 6,759 16,784 6,904 20,449 PELICAN BAY 5.551 8,911 5,136 8,690 997 1,811 n/a n/a GG COMM PARK 36,938 90,532 91,540 217,770 0 0 0 0 ATHLETICS 0 0 96 192 2.447 19,856 5,429 17,751 RACQUET CTR 2,520 4,700 2,437 4,368 13,023 26,847 10,434 23,245 IMMOKALEE CP 77,328 116,404 63,095 124,042 2,544 6,286 1,340 2,956 IMM SPORTS 19,176 26,660 23,499 52,350 3,229 5,587 1,177 5,095 FOOD PROG TOTALS . , .:.;:. .-,". ....... .-; :,-.'. .. . .... .-,., .... .,, ...... . ....... ., . ;.::.,?.... t.327,~40 ',": '"' ;/~6: ~ " '"""'~" .' .... " ' """*~'!' " ' :'~625,612 :~35'7,679 - 8 ~¢i; ~¢.t:'63,740'-':~:i63,792 ..,.':.'53,046 . 136,767 I m m m m m m m ! m m m m m m Athletic users are already counted in park/facility user figures (B) 8 I i ! I I I I I I I I I I I ! I ! I I RECREATION SECTION MONTHLY REPORT NOVEMBER 1997 GOLDEN GATE AQUATIC FACILITY Registered Class Participants Facility Users Program Hours Program Participant I lours Rexenue Special Events 67 1152 16 113 4.107 0 GOLDEN GATE FITNESS CENTER Registered Class Participants 13 FaciliD' Users 2.947 Program Hours 13 Program Participant I Iours 13 Revenue 8.6e~3 Special Events 0 EAST NAPLES CO,",IMUNITY PARK Registered Class Participants Park Users Program lt.urs Program Participant Hours Revenue Special Events il0 40,982 83 162 3,012 0 FRANKMACKLECO31,M PARK Registered Class Participants 201 Park Users 12,o20 Program Hours 60 Program Participant Hours 6.783 Revenue 5.707 Special Events 8 GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER Registered Class Participants Facility Users Program ltours Program Pa~icipant Hours Revenue Special Events 117 23.400 143 3.367 7,650 500 RACQUET CENTER Registered Class Participants 128 Facili~' Users 2.520 Program Hours 58 Program Participant Flours 128 Revenu~ 13,023 Special Events 2O0 VETERANS COMMUNITY PARK Registertd Class Participants Park Users Program ttours l'rogram Participant Hours Revenue Special Events 354 47,426 156 4,399 5,602 0 VINEYARDS COMMUNITY PARK Registered Class Participants 83 Park Users 48.000 Program Hours 132 Program Participant Hours 3,425 Revenue 6.795 Special Events 0 IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY PARK Registered Class Participants Park Users Program Hours Program Participant Hours Revenue Special Events 60 77,328 54 3,240 2,544 400 IMMOKALEE SPORTS COMPLEX Registered Class Participants 0 Park Users 19,176 Program Hours 7 Program Participant Hours 23 Revenue 3,229 Special Events 1,201 (B) 9 OCTOBER Pool 4,232 4.232 3,252 3,262 3,509 3,509 6,924 6,9241 Fitness n/a n/a n,'a n/a 5,567 5,567 10,503 10503 To~als 4,232 4,232 3.252 3,262 9,076 9,076 17,427 17.427 NOVEMBER Pool 3.679 7,911 2,978 6.240 3,122 6,631 4,107 11.031 Fitness n/a n/a 4,447 4.447 3,912 9,479 8,663 19.166 Totals 3,679 7,911 7.,425 10,687 7,034 16,110 12,770 30.197 DECEMBER Pool 3,139 11,050 1,294 7,534 3,889 10,520 Fitness n/a n/a 2.845 7,292 4,342 13,821 Totals 3,139 11,050 4,139 14,826 8,231 24,341 JANUARY Pool 3,872 14,922 2.878 10,412 6,291 16,811 Fitness n/a n/a 7,714 15.006 14,867 28,688 Tct~'Is 3.872 14.922 10.592 25.418 21,158 45,499 FEBRUARY Pool 3,815 18,737 4,603 15.015 8,254 25,065 Filness n/a n/a 4,082 19,088 8,191 36,879 Totals 3,815 18,737 8,685 34,103 16.445 61,944 MARCH Pool 10.309 29,046 6,675 21,690 18,771 43,836 Fitness n/a nla 3,760 22.848 5,396 42,275I Totals 10,309 29,046 10,435 44.538; 24,167 86.111 APRIL Pool 12,851 41,897 11,312 33,002 13,784 57.620 Fitness n/a n/a 5.204 28,052 6,978 49,253 Totals 12,851 41,897 16.518 61,054 20,762 106,873 MAY Pool 16,846 58,743 15,256 48,258 26,016 583,636 Fitness n/a n/a 4,030 32,082 6,919 56,172 Totals 16,846 58,743 19,286 80,340 32,935 139,808 JUNE Pool 19,396 78,139 20.540 68,798, 35,210 118,846 Fitness n/a n/a 3,318 35,400 8,077 64,249 Totals 19,396 78,139 23.858 104,198 43,287 183,095 JULY Pool 12,936 91,075 18,424 87,222 26,017 144,863 Fitness n/a n/a 5.181 40,581 6,290 70,539 Totals 12,936 91,075 23,605 127,803 32,307 215,402 AUGUST Pool 11,664 102,739 17,195 104,416 19,617 164,480 Filness n/a n/a 4,833 45,414 7,697 85,877 Totals 11,664 102,7391 22,028 149,830 27,314 242,716 SEPTEMBER Pool 8,704 111,443 11,459 115,875 11,366 175,846 Filness n/a n/a 10,078 55,492 7,641 85,877 Totals 8,704 111,443 21,537 171,367 19,007 261,723 II I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I (B) 10 . I I I I I I I I I I ! I I I I i I II COLLIER COUNTY RACQUET CENTER REVENUE REPORT ~Y ~,~~ 1~.,~~'~ 1~,~ I ~..~,~ MTH [ ~D MTH ~ YTD MTH ~ YTDj MTH ~ YTD OCTOBER 5,371 5,371 6,173 6,173 12,811 12,811 13,824 13,824 NOVEMBER 8,595 13,96~ 12,327 18,500 10,434 23,245 13,023 26,847 DECEMBER 6,722 20,688 5,418 23,918 6,989 30,234 JANUARY 10,432 31,120 10,001 33,919 9,~00 39,834 FEBRUARY 8,176 39,296 9,719 43,~38 8,851 48,685 MARCH 6,121 45,417 5,7g~ 49,434 6,156 54,841, APRIL 5,016 50,433 6,587 56,021 ~,287 61,128 MAY 4,328 54,761 3,817 59,838 4,14g 65,277 ~UNE 3,g18 58,679 2,158 ~1,996 3,081 68,358 JULY 3,321 62,000 3,990 85,98~ 5,489 74,207 AUGUST 2,945 64,945 4,546 70,532 7,685 81,892 SEPTEMBER 4,182 69,127 6,830 77,362 8,429 90,321 I I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I BEACH AND WATER MONTHLY REPORT NOVEMBER 1997 USERS REVENUE CURRENT YEAR PRIOR YEAR C'URRENT YEAR PRIOR YEAR MTH Y'rD MTH YTD MTH YTD 'I MTH YTD METERS (ACTUAL) BAREFOOT 7,192 11,411 13,444 25,578 338 711 730 1,18; BB PRESERVE 11,887 22,533 3,177 7,530 5,118 9,868 6,588 11.45I CLAM PASS 14,510 24,398 9,148 18,985 2,314 5,125 2,672 4 TIGERTAiL 23,460 42,856 19,644 31,348 12,569 23,195 12.954 22 475 VAN~ERBILT 8,949 19.785 6.859 13,727 1,504 2,656 11174 2 16~ V BCH RD METERS 0 0 0 0 614 1,817 1.035 2 N GULF SHORE 4,540 6.904 5,052 7.392 78 250 114 185 SOUTH MARCO 3.907 7,531 3,465 8.298 1,146 2.838 970 1.619 TOTAL 74,445 135,418 60,789 112.858 23,681 46,460 26,237 45,425 LAUNCH METERS (ACTUAL) BAYVIEW 8,256 15,825 7,658 17,562 218 1,404 441 I, 114 SR 9:' ~ 5.155 9,806 1,944 5.949 0 0 0 0 CAXAMBAS 5.690 10.955 1,972 5,312 0 0 0 LAKE TRAFFORD 7.780 20.048 7.920 15,804 0 0 0 0 COCOHATCHEE 15,000 27,258 10,800 20,131 685 2.007 323 413 TOTAL 41,881 83,902 30,294 64,758 903 3.411 764 1.527 CONCESSIONS (ACTUAL) BOAT LAUNCH 657 1319 711 1283 C ONCE SS ION S 10299 15699 7545 TOTAL CONC. 10956 17018~ 8256 14834 BEACH VENDOR 250 750 0 C CITATIONS 450 780 0 0 ! I NOVEMBER 1997 ~ · THE IN~IOKALEE SPORTS · ~,~,-- ~.~ MEET ON NOVEMBER 14th. COMPLEX HOSTED SA DISTRICT SWIM THE AREAS BEST HIGH SCHOOL DIVERS FLIPPED AND TWISTED OVER THE GOLDEN GATE AQUATIC FACILITY DURING THE FLIGH SCHOOL CLASS 5A DISTRICT DIVING CFbkMPIONSHIPS ON NOVEMBER 13th. I · I . I I 500 TEENS DANCED UP A STORM AT THE GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER ON NOVEMBER 14th. TENNIS WAS HOPPING AT THE PELICAN BAY COMMUNITY PARK AS THE TURKEY CLASSIC TENNIS TOURNAMENT V,,'AS HELD ON THE WEEKEND OF NOVEMBER 21st. 200 PEOPLE PARTICIPATED IN THE EVENT. I I I · GOLDEN GATE CO~%M~TY PARK HELD A MIDDLE SCHOOL FIELD DAY ON NOVEMBER 26th. 2:50 KiDS ATTENDED THE EVENT. GOLDEN GATE COMMUNITY CENTER RECEIVED THE QUARTERLY BEAUTIFICATION AWARD FROM THE GOLDEN GATE CIVIC ASSOCIATION FOR OUTSTANDING PROPERTY MAINTENANCE. · THE VETERANS PARK ROLLER HOCKEY RINK OPENED 1'O THE SOUND OF KIDS SLAMMIN THE BOARDS. (B) ~3 I I I I I ! I ! i I I I I I I I I I I COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT RECREATION MONTHLY REPORT DECEMBER 1997 FACILITY PARK/FACILITY USI CURRENT YEAR PRIOR YEAR MTH MTH GG AQUATIC 2,330 9,102 GG FITNESS 3,242 9,070 EAST NAPLES 44,112 152,815 FRANK MACKLE 33,300 59,140 3G COMM CTR 21,905 66,789 VETERANS CP 38.87( 124,187 ¢INEYARDS CP 33,17,~ 134,236 PELICAN BAY 7,164 16,075 GG COMM PARK 38,804 129,336 ATHLETICS 0 0 RACQUET CTR 2,420 7,120 IMMOKALEE CP 76,075 192,479 IMM SPORTS 19,322 45,982 FOOD PROG 2.173 1,682 50,629 18.49~ 16,49C 25.531 30,780 6,948 67,313 40~ 2,25; 10,b22 REVENU! 320,719 946,331 314,712 1,055,81; Athletic users are already counted in park/facility user figures CURRENT YEAR MTH YTD PRIOR YEAR MTH 7,64~ 5,067 16,098 3,88~ 5,559 8,473 27,639 4,342 161,957 8,759 4,617 56,111 5,701 17,335 5,598 40,792 7,325 27,853 5.187 77,070 9,274 28,184 10,810 126,050 8,378 25,162 8,592 15,638 1,064 2,875r n/a 289,099 0, 0 0 597 5,107 24,963 5,040 6,620 7,100 33,947 6,989 206,301 1,899 8,185 1,495 62,372 3,259 8,846 66,054 229,846 709 57,26~ (B) 14 16G YTD 10,520 13.821 11.244 14.3~{ /-' ~2/ 3~,116 29.04 n/,~ 0 22.791 30234 4.451 5.804 194,035 I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I i I I I GOLDEN GATE AQUATIC & FITNESS CENTER REVENUE REPORT MONTH NOVEMBER DECEMBEF JANUARY FEBRUARY ER FY 1994195 MTH YTD Pool 4,232 4,232 Fitness n/a n/a TcIals 4,232 4,232 Pool Fitness Totals Pool Fitness Totals Pool Fitness To~ais Pocl FttP, ess Totals Pool F~lness Totals Pool Fffness Totats Pool Filness Totals 3,679 7,911J n/a n/a J 3,679 7,91 J I 3,139 11,05( J n/a n/a 3,139 11,050 &PRIL 3,872 14,922 n/a n/a 3,872 14,922 3.815 18,737 n/a n/a 3.815 18,737 10,309 29,046 n/a n/a 10,309 29,046 12,851 41,897 n/a n/a 12,851 41,897 16,846 58.74; n/a 16,846 58,743 Pool 19.396 78,139 Fitness n/a n/a Totals 19.396 78,139 ~ool Fdness Totals Pool Fitness Tola;s Pool Fitness Tolals 12.936 91,075 n/a n/a 12,936 91.075 11,664 102.739 n/a n~ 11,664 102,739 8,704 111,443 n/a n/a 8,704 111,443 FY 1995196 3,262 3,262 n/a nla 3,262 3,262 2,978 6,240 4,447 4,447 7,425 10,687 1,294 7,534 2,845 7,292 4,139 14,826 2,878 10,412 7,714 15,006 10,592 25,418 4,603 15,015 4,082 19,088 8,685 34,103 3,509 3,509[ 5.567 5.5671 9,076 9,076 3.122 6,631 3,912 9,479 7,034 16,110 3,889 10,520 4,342 13,821 8,231 24,341 6,291 16,81 14,867 28.68; 21,158 45,49! 8,254 25.065 8,191 36.87~ 16,445 61,94, 6,675 21,690 18,771 43.83 3.760 22.848 5.396 42.27 10.435 44.538 24.167 85.11 11,312 33.002 13.784 57.62( 5.204 28,052 6,978 49,25: 16,516 61,054 20,762 10687, 15,256 48,258 26,016 583,63( 4,030 32,082 6.919 56,17, 19.286 80.340 32,935 139,80; 20,540 68.798 35,210 118,84{ 3,318 35,400 8,077 64.249 23,858 104,198 43,287 183.095 18,424 87,222 26,017 144.863 5,181 40,581 6,290 70,539 23,605 127,803 32.307 215.402 17,195 104,416 19,617 164,480 4,833 45,414 7,697 85.877 22.028 149.830 27.314 242.716 11,459 115.875 11,366 175,846 10,078 55,492 7.641 85,877 21,537 171,367 19,007 261,723 FY 1997/98 MTH YTD 6,924 6,924 10,503 10,503 17.427 17,427 4,107 11,031 8,663 19,166 12,770 30,197 5,067 16098 8,473 27.-$39 13,540 43,737 (B) 15 16G 2 I I I m BEACH AND WATER MONTHLY REPORT mDECEMBER 1997 VANDERBILT 17.725 37,511~ -~2 ~~815 38,2B~ 8.555 22.283 1,389 4,045 2.059 422~ V BCH RD METER: 0 0J 0 761 2,57 1.285 3.76; N GULF SHORE 5481 12,38 7,332 90 180 ~;~ SOUTH MARCO 4,740 5,004 13,302 1,693 4,531 1.95 i 3.57 TOTAL 97,514 232,932 74,258 187,659 26,747 35.898 82.32 m m CONCESSIONS BOAT LAUNCH CONCESSIONS ITOTAL CONC, 3EACH VENDOR m 31TAT~ONS mGRAND TOTAL LAUNCH METERS (ACTUAL) BA YVIEW 6.213 22,03~ 12,180 29,742 0 1,404 1,173 2.287 SR 951 5,520 15.3; 3.256 9,20~ 0 0 C CAXAMBAS 5.176 16.131 4.483 9.7~ 0 0 LAKE TRAFFORD 15 153 35.201 8390 24.194 0 0 COCOHATCHEE i I 258 38,526 9.338 29,46! 714 1.471 1 8~, TOTAL 43,320 127 37.647 102 714 2.644 4,171 360, 290,064 IACTUAL) 609 1928 1262 ~ 11760 2f,4~.' ~c 11,971 2~ 12.369 13,233 28.06 0 75C 0 555 133 40.385 114,562 m m m (B) 16 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I OCTOBER NOVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FEBRUARY MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER COLLIER COUNTY RACQUET CENTER REVENUE REPORT FY 1994~95 5,371 5,371 8,595 13,966 6,722 20,688 10,432 31,120 8.176 39,296 6,121 45,417 5,016 50,433 4.328 54,761 3.918 58,679 3,321 62,000 2,945 64,945 4,182 69,127 FY 1995196 FY 1996/'97 MTH YTD MTH YTD 6,173 6,173 12,327 18,500 5,418 23,918 10,001 33,919 9,719 43,638 5,796 49,434 6,587 56,021 3,817 59,838 2,158 61,996 3,990 65,986 4,546 70,532 6,830 77,362 12,811 12.81 10,434 23.245 6,989 30.234 9,600 39.834 8.851 4868 6,156 54.84' 6,287 61,12~ 4,149 65277 3,081 68.35~ 5.489 74,207 7,685 81,892 8,429 90,321 FY 1997/98 MTH 13,824 13,023 7,100 YTD 13,824 26,847 33,947 (B) Z? I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I [ [ [[[[[nm[ I Ill I Illll I Ill Il I .... [ Illll ............ I RECREATION SECTION MONTitLY REPORT NOVEMBER 1997 (;OLDEN GATE AQUATIC FACII, ITY Registered Class Participants Facility Users Program t louts Program Participant itours Revenue Special Events 77 2330 16 16651 506 00 GOLDEN GATE FITNESS CENTER Registered Class Participants 18 Facility Users 3242 Program llours 18 Program Participant Hours 324 Revenue 8473 Special Events 0 EAST NAPLES COMMUNITY PARK Registered Class Participants Park Users Program ttours Program Participant tlours Revenue Special Events 88 44112 143 1528 3407 0 FRANK MACKLE COMM PARK Registered Class Participants 348 Park Users 33300 Program Itours ! ! 7 Program Participant Hours 3180 Revenue 5701 Special Events 0 (;OLDEN (;ATE COMMUNITY CENTER Registered Class Participants Facility Users Program Ihmrs l'rogram Participant I hmrs Revenue Special Events 73 21905 192 3220 7325 400 RACQUET CENTER Registered Class Participams 53 Facility Users 2420 Program ttours 28 Program Participant Hours 53 Revenue 7100 Special Events 0 VETERANS COMMUNITY PARK Registered Class Participants Park Users Program Hours I'rogram Participant ttours Revenue Special Events 3O6 38870 182 7159 9274 0 VINEYARDS COMMUNITY PARK Registered Class Participants 174 Park Users 33175 Program Hours 180 Program Participant Hours 6240 Revenue 8378 Special Events 370 IMMOKALEE COMMUNITY PARK Registered Class Participants Park Users Program Hours Program Participant Flours Revenue Special Events 66 76075 51 2736 1899 350 IMMOKALEE SPORTS COMPLEX Registered Class Participants I 0 Park Users 19322 Program Hours I 0 Program Participant Hours 70 Revenue 3259 Special Events 1596 I P A R K DECEMBER 1997 RECREATION BLIZZARD CONDITIONS COVERED GOLDEN GATE AND IM`VlOKALEE ON DECEMBER 6Ttl AS SEVERAL TONS OF SNOW FELL DURING SNOWFEST AND CttRISTMAS AROUND THE WORLD. THOUSANDS ATTENDEDI OVER 100 AREA CiliLDREN RECEIVED CALLS FROM JOLLY OLD ST. NICK WITil TilE llELP OF STAFF EI,VES. SANTA ALSO PLUMPED UP WtllLE FEASTING ON BREAKFAST WITll 300+ CiliLDREN FROM IMMOKALEE AND NAPLES. TilE TVVO POOLS IGNORED OLD MAN WINTER AND ilOSTED SPECIAl, EVENTS ON DECEMBER 20Ttl. 1 2.~ CHILDREN ATTENDED X-MAS CAMP AT THE COMMUNITY PARKS. WtlAT DOES 50 / 50 MEAN? 50 TEAMS WITtl PARTICIPANTS 50 YEARS AND OLDER PARTICIPATED IN A SOFTBALl, TOURNAMENT AT VARIOUS FIEI,DS THROUGH OUT THE COLINTV..~\ ~ ONE TllOUSAND PEOPLE SiiOWED lIP AT TIlE IMMOKA1,EE SPORTS COMPI,EX TO llEAR 12 BANDS PLAY AT THE "PRIMER FESTIVAl, OF MUSIC" ON DECEMBER 14Tll. TIlE IIOI.IDA'~' SEASON CAN'T KEEP TIlE SOCCER LOVERS AWAY. 336 SEI'S OF FEET RAN TIlE FIEI.DS EACll PRAC'FICE DURING TIlE MONTH OF DECEMBER IN IMMOKALEE A l.ON E. VETERANS PARK lilT A HO,vIE RUN WtlILE liOSTING A YOUTii BASEBALL TRAINING CAMP Tile '¢,'EEK OF DECEMBER 29Ttl. LIPIZZAN STALLIONS PRANCED AROUND VINEYARD'S SOCCER FIELDS ON DEC. 7 & 8Ttl. 60 PARTICIPANTS TURNED OUT FOR THE ANNUAL MISTELTOE RLIN AT VINEYARDS PARK ON DEC. 13Tll. I (B) 19 I I I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I 168 2'~ I I I I I ilOARI) OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PAll. KS AND I,IECIIEATION RECAPS: Nov. / Dee. '166 1 I,'1 g/97 SA I Proclamation recognizing Christina Long for her tree donation to East Naples Community Park 1 I/18,'97 $A2 Proclamation recognizing Pelican Bay Park as an outstanding Tennis Facility bx' the United States Tennis Association I 1'18,'97 16C4 Amendment of Chapter 89-449 allowing bonfires and other cxcnts at thc discretion of the P & R director. To be presented to local l.cgislation I/11/97. 12'2/97 16C2 Budget amendment from reserves for $34.290 to purchase 15 portable , radios for park rangers. 12 '9'97 [ 5C2 I F'resentation to Ed Tortoni. Assistant to thc Athletic Supervisor. as Collier Count,.' "Employee of thc Year" ?_ ! i ! I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I'ARKN A~I) I(i.:('RF,..~I'i()~ AI)VI,~()I(Y I{()ARI) I x ~,1 () I<~, 1,1'.i.~ !) 15'i'1{ I("i XI~ thll~c ('hcnc~ ~r¢~dcnccI I')411 h~,7-121l Term F:xpire~ 123 q.'~l{('() I~I,ANI) I)l.%'rlU('l' I I{ll,'~'~ I)1.~'1'1{1("1 :) ',II l':nlolh~ \1 IIl;i:.Ll:¢d \.:1¢;',. Fbrld;I U lll~ 'X;ll'dL",. I:lorld,I qulu .'r,I-144(, II':lj:'.er) 4;r,-';'~4') il ,ix) :'nl-,"';~(,~ \Ir John (:ncc ~;I, ('lurl~.m.t!;.,~ IIuulc~.ud I]:)4 5,;llqO,. [ hr:d:: ~4 l I ~ ~' t' ;i x ) 7u ;-2.414 IL. ri, hi)irt', I: .ti ,).,.; '1 ,.'rm i-:'qlir'e, I 2 3 I,nl T~.,'m l<'q:irt,, I 2 3 i 4) I I, 'l't'rm Exl:irc~ 12/3 I/',"t 16G I I I I I I I I I I I I I I C) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I IIII I III I IIIII I II IIIII I ....... Iii I ..... I ADOPT- A- PARK RfPORT l'li(' .~,dOlil-.:-l)ark l{elmrl k imni:h'd Il}' lhe Parks :llld l{cc,'calio,: .~dl'~li~Ol') ih}ard. l(:icll l'..\l{ ~,l{ meml):.r ~'i~il~ lh:'ir adOl)led imf'ks mid ,,i, es ii del:liled relmrl li::rl,~ ~'ondilion. Th:' l}Urlm~e lit' lhk relmrl i~ to hell: l:ilrl.~ :lad l)t'liarllllelll Io C~:,linil:llly illllil'IBl(,, ill .l;li:ll:lii:i,l'-' llark l'im Blackford: a. Veterans COlllllltillil.v Park h. (]lam Pass (}ommu.ily Park Report on 1/28/98 Billie Cheney: a. Immokalee Conllmmity Park I,. lmlnokalee Recre:llion/Aquatic Report on 2/25/98 (;il M.cllcr: a. Frank Mackle C'onmmnity Park I~. Tigertail Beach c. Collier County Racquet Center l{eport on 4~22/98 .Iohn (;,'ice: a. (;ocohatchcc River Park h. l,ely Ilarel'oot Beach Repor! 011 5/28197 Elaille Wicks: a. Viln'yards (;omm.,it.v l'ark I). Ilayview (?ommunily Park Rqml'l on 12/17/9'7,, Report oil 6/24/98 · l()selfll Z:lks: :l. Sugden Regional Park I~. East Naples (;on~n~.nity Park Report on 7/22/98 D i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I P~RKg AND RECRE~TION /~DVigORY BO/~RD MEETING ~CHED{II.E Z:O0 P.M. D~i q'E t. .l :l n tl :l r,, 2g. 2. I'cl)r.ar,. 25. Imhg ~. ~l)ril 22. 1998 ~,. .I..c 24. 1908 ' .luh 22. g. .~.~ltq 26, 1998 O. ~eplcflll)er 23. I~l. ()ctohcr 28. 1998 II..No','Clllhef 25, 12. I)('('e.ll)er 23. I~OGd q'lON %t,/'iclwltul'e t~ I'[xle.~ioll, I-l'ltll I,tm,,A,d,.,. I?,,,,,I I{:lre['o(]l Ik'ach. It,,.if,~/~,.,../~ II]llllokah'e ( ()llllllllllil~ I'nrk, 32/ v. /" ~ll~(lell RcRiolI;II Park. O,/,'r I)riv,' ~'ineyar(l~ ( 'Ollllllllllil~ i);li'k. ~)2.?'.lrh.r (;(fid('. (;;Il(' ('()ntmi~nily ('enler. J-Ol ~l:l~ Y. II;l~c .Ir. ('ommu.ilv I)nrk. (,,,I.I.. (,,.,. Ih'vd. I'.IL.~ 'l'.l{.,~ 'i'.IL,~ '~()'1'1'.: \ieeli.~ dales c.ul(I I)e chan~c(I (I.e t() h.li(lavs .I)scrxc(l. I'.XR..XI~ ,.c'ml)crs ~ill he .()lific(I 2 ~eeks pri.r I. meeli.g date in thc e~'cnl .f a ch;In~e. I)ARAII meels e~'er~' 4'h ~ e(I.es(lav ()t'cach month. '":* \!1'i \NA .\ i).\'I'E ()R .\ !,()(' \'1'1()~ II.\S I{I,:EN ('iI.~,N(;EI). i) (24} ,, AB ! 1 m m PARK~ & RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD I I i I i I ! I i WEDINESD/NY, FEBR{I/~RY 28, 1998 /~T VETER/NIN COMMUNITY P/~RK 2:00 P.M. I I I 1900 IMMOR/~LEE RO,~D. IN/~PLE$, FLORIDfi Norr i $ Hancock Constantine's_. Mac'):le ~err~ PARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD AGENDA February 25, 1998 'i'he Parks and Recreation Advisory Board meeting will be held Wednesday, February 25, 1998, 2:00 ll.m. at Veterans Community P:~rk, 1900 immokalee Road, Naples, Florida. I. CAI,L TO ORDER: II. PI,EDGE OF ALLEGIAN('E TO TIlE FLAG: Ill. INVO('ATION: IV. APPROVAl, OF MINI;TES, January 28, 1998 Meeting V. INTRODUCTION: VI. AWARD PRESENTATION: I. Attilude Award - Cindy Rimes VII. NEW BUSINESS: i. Food Grant 1998 VIII. REQUESTS FOR DISCUSSION - SPECIFIC UPDATE ITEM I. Sugden Regional Park Update 2. Max A. ilasse Community Park Basketball Pavillion VIii. REPORTS/UPDATES: I. Monlhly Report (.January) 2. BCC - Recaps for February 3. Adopt-A-Park Report 4. Parab Meeting Schedtlle x. ADJOURNMENT A I-8 B9-15 Cl6 CI7 I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I I I I I 16G 2 A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Illll Illl[[I ]Illin' I Nil IIII II .................... ik I'ARKS AND RECREATION ADVISORY BOARD .lanuar?.' 28, 1998 Minutes Agriculture & Cooperative Extension Sen'ices 14700 Immokalee, Naples, Florida PRESENT: Joseph Zaks, Chairman Daphnie Bercher, Vice Chair Gil Mueller Timothy Blackford John (;rice ABSENT: Billie Cheney (Resigned) Elaine Wicks (Resigned) Ga~' Franco, Parks Superintendent ALS() PRESENT: Maria Ramsey, Director Murdo Smith, Recreation .Manager .lacquie Hart, Secretary I! John Dunnuck, Operations Coordinator Denise Blanton, CED Director Darrell Caplc, Green Heron Landscape Ih)b Lyndabury, Master Gardener Tom Poter, Master Gardner Bill Dietrich, Master Gardner Bob Petersen, Urban Horticultural John Veit, Parks and Recreation Elizabeth M. Glennon, Commercial Horticulture Jan R. Bennett I. CALL TO OI,I.I)ER: the meeting was call to order at 2:15 p.m. ~1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG ~. INVOCATION: by John Grice ~v. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: November 19, 1997 meeting. Motion by Joseph Zaks to approved November 19, 1997. Seconded by Gil Mueller. Passed 5/0. v. AWARD PRESENTATION: Dawn Dodge and John Veit was awarded thc Attitude Award. Mr. Mueller commented that he worked with John Veit for about nine (9'~5) years and John has always been responsive to the maintenance problem at I I I I I Marco. Mr. Veit always acted instantly and was very eager to help. !I¢ did a great job. VI. INTROI)UCTION: Chairman Blackford welcomed and introduced Mr. John Gricc who is thc ncxv Parks and Recreation Advisory Board member. I Vii. NEW liUSINESS/PRESENTATIONS I I I I I I I I I I I I I ae Agriculture Garden Presentation Ms. Denise Blalmm introduced herself and stated that the Department of Agricuhurc is part of Public Services along with Parks and Recreation. Thc Agriculture Department is ,,'`'ell known to others as 4tt I lorticuht, ral I.earning Center. Mr. 'l'om Porter. a Master Gardener for I1 years with thc l'Xtcnsi~,n Services; made a slide presentation showing the various site lbr thc proposed gardening model showcase. Mr. Porter stated that there arc approximately 22 acres of land and a 3 acre pond at thc Agricuhurc and lixtcnsion property. The Department of Agricuhure would like to plant spccilic gardens to show how native Florida plants grmv in typical environment. These gardens will be helpfifl when educating thc public. ()l~en times, the public asks the Department tbr ide:~s concerning kmdscaping at their home. The gardens would oflk'r a visu.~lizcd concept of their inquiries. Thc idea '`vas to create an agriculture learning center. LIntbrtunatclv funds ran out. The department has been working for thc last few .,,'cars trying to accomplish the funding for this project primarily by generating some interest in the public. ,\Ir. Porter stated that he hopes there could be a joint partner'ship between Parks and Recreation and tile Agriculture and Cooperative Extension to develop this county wide agricuhural park. Nlr. Porter stated that Iht funding is needed for the inl'rastructure of the gardens. Parks and Recreation Department are involved in these partnership elsewhere. Thc concept is not new. Other counties are using the idea (pamphlet from I.ake County ,,,,'ere si'town as .joint venture). Darrell Caple of Green Heron Landscape discussed tile bud~ect for each gardens. For example thc cost of xcriscapc garden is: planting. $14.000: paths. $3,000; Irrigation, $1.000; and Trellis. $5.000. There arc 10 proposed gardens and a learning pavilion. Each Landscape Architect I I I I I I ! I I ! I I I I I I I I I would have an opportunity to display their design for tile indMdual gardens showcase. Tile cost for a Ltaming Pavilion was approximately $90.000 lbr 900 square feel. Mr. Caple stated that thc individual gardens could be done in phases. Thc first phase would cost approximately $38.000. Some concerns were raised as to what type of soil will be used for tile gardening. Mr. Caple stated that grade A top soil will not be t,scd for this project because they ~vant to sinmlate a regular landscape setting similar to someone's home. Ms. Blanton stated that there has been some donation: however the vcntt,rc would make a great partnership between Parks and Recreation and Agriculture Department. Mr. Blacklbrd inquired what is it that the Department of Agriculture is looking for from tile Parks and Recreation Department. Ms. Blanton stated that whether the Parks and Recreation Departn:ent would like to be partners or if this would be a parks project that the Parks and Recreation Department would be interested in. Ms. Blanton is requesting ti'mt the Parks and Recreation Department assist with the cost of $38.000 for the installation. The De['nrtment of Agricultt, re would be able to come up with 20% of the'cost throt,gh donations and is requesting that the Parks and Recreation come t,p with 80%. Mr. Mueller suggested fllat Ms. Blanton contact local community organizations who are willing to donate to a project of ti'tis sort. ,X. lr. Mueller stated that tile project is a good idea but the Parks and Recreation Department is constantly supporting organizations or individuals that proposed for playground equipment and ect. Mr. Mueller stated that there are foundations that are xvilling to contribute to this kind of project and xvhy not approach them. I 16G 2i I 1 Mr. Mueller complimented the Agriculture Department lbr a .job well done because he always calls with garden questions ami tile department have been ,,'er.,,' helpful. I I I I I Mr. Blackford stated that tile project is too costly and the inlbmmtio, presented is lacking in ten'ns of what money could possibly be donated: and what kind of revenue would be generated. Mr. Blackford stated that the Parks and Recreation Department has trouble getting more basel',all fields and kids arc standing there with no place to pla.,.'. Mr. Blacklbrd ti'finks the project is a good idea but not knowing what the demand is this type of facility the Parks and Recreation Advisory Board could vote. A suggestion was made to thc Agriculture Department to get thc pr().jcct started and sec what kind of interest or community involvement would bc there. I Mr. Zaks inquired as to what fund did the Agriculture budget come from and whether il' tile department ,,,,'as getting hnpact Fees. I i I Nls. Ramscv stated that the/\gricultt~re Department works (ma very ti,.2, ht budget and there mc, ney comes from the Collier County ge.oral funds. NIr. Nlucllcr suggested ti'mt tile project would bavc a lot of potential it' tile Agriculture I3¢pamncnt would set the garden were citizens could pay for a garden and put a plaque or sometMng to say who the garden is donated by. I Ms. Berchcr suggested that thc project bc broken down into phases Silo, wing tile cost. 1 ~'o motiolls %','ere made. I .,\ request was made that Agriculture Department make another presentaticm. I I I be PARAB Officers Election - Motion by Gill Mueller to elect Mr. .Joseph Zaks as Chairman. Seconded by Tim l?,l:~ckford. Passed unanimously. Motion by Tim Blackford to elect Daphne Bercher as %'ice Chairperson. Seconded by John Grice. Passed unanimously. I I I i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I VIII. Letter of Resignation - Ms. Elaine Wicks submitted a letter resignation from the Parks and Recreation /\dvisor,' Board. Also .Xls. Billie Chenev submitted a letter of resignation to Sue Filson. Questions were raised as to what determined the district in order for an individual to apply or served for PARAB position. Ms. Ramsey will research. Ms. Ramscy stated that according to the ordinance il says Commtm]tv Park District. REQUEST FOR DISCUSSION/SPECIFIC UPDATE ITEM do Beach and Water Ordinance 89-11 Mr. 131ackford stated that at the last meeting which no quort]m present he had discussed that thc verbiage in Ordinance 89-I1 be amended. *Is. Ramscv stated that she had a meeting and the County ?,ttorncv ()fllcc is in agreement v, ith that the ordinance 89-II needs to be mncnd~..d..Xls. Ramsev stated that she could not submit and RLS lbr thc o:dinancc to bc amended until she is directed bv tile Board of Cot,htr Commissioners A discussion took place stating that there ,,,,'as a situation were a gentlemen was able to obtain a vendor's permit. The gentlemen got pemfission from the hotel to utilized their access through their property fevcn though there were other vendors with permits): in front of the hotels on the beach. 'I'o put up a chickec hut: to get arotmd having a physical site wi:h which to operate. Mr. Blackford stated that the language in tile ordinance was changed once already to make it restrictive but in fact it made it less restrictive. Ms. Ramsey stated that actually it did make it restrictive except that a North and South boundary is missing in tile ordinance. If there was a North and South boundary there: the easement which the hotel owns trees to a I V: loot to a 4 foot wide easement which would have limited' the vendor to a I V: foot segment of the beach. Mr. Mueller stated that the easement is not commercial and it is a private easement which should have never been used for commercial pt,rposes. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ! I 16G Mr. Blacklbrd stated that tile intent of tile ordinance was to linlit the number of pcmlits that are issued and it is not doing it. glr. Mueller stated that thc enforcement was done by an imlividual ,al~,, lived on tile beach. gls. Ramsey stated that tile Rangers had requested state l~¢rmit, building permit, deeds, casement permission thinking that the gentlemen would meet tile rettuirement but he managed to go through all of thc loops. Mr. Mucllcr stated thc he had spent over a month trying to resolve this issue. Nlr. Mueller read an article stating" A permitting of a vendor Marco beach has cause a considerable concern in Ibc City of Nlarco arid the County governmeHt. A badly written ordinance full of lo~u~ holes allowed a permit to be issued to a vendor not on thc beach. Thc potential expansion of numcrot~s jet skis ccclra that could be cslablish is boggling. Only that this permit was issued by a park ranger and park rangers are not authorized to issue beach permits according to ordin',mcc 1:96-573. We became a City on August 28. 1997 and lhc permit issued on December 1W'. 1997. Marco City must issue its own permits in its own City. I have spoken to thc County Auorncy l)avid Wcigcl and his Assistant Attorney is in the process of tightening thc ordinaHcc ami also the temporary Marco City ..Xmm~cy Nlr. Cuylcr is dcvch,?in~ a beach ordinance Ibr glarco to lake ~xcr control of their oxvn cii~ beaches and permitting. Whatever is bcin~ discuss right now is not goiHg Io pcr~,Hn to Marco Island." Mr. Blackford inquired whether it' tile City of Marco is takiHg over the Tigcrtail Beach. .'Xlr. Mucllcr stated thal 'no' Ibc County will contirme to own thc Tigcrtail beach but thc City will run thc other beaches. Thc County will not have ;my cmHrol of'thc other beaches on Marco. Chaimlan Zaks stated that hc would like to see that thc ordinance has COllCiSc control. ~Is. Ramscy stated that Ordinance 89-1 i deals with a nmnbcr of issues not only vendors and jet skis. Mr. Mucllcr inquired should tile Park Rangers have tile attthority to issue vendors permits and control to cntbrce tile ordinance or should a higher authority have responsibly. Mr. Mueller also stated that thc Rangers does not have tile power itl tile ordinance to enforce it. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i i I i ~6GZ Ms. Ramsev s(:ucd thai once a vehicle ~ocs into Ibc ~vatcr it is no hm,.,cr a park ranger rcsponsihly. Thc vendor is a land l~asc operation and the rangers make sure lhat lhcy arc in compliance with all thc regulations. Chairnlan Zaks requested that the Ran~ers submitted a reporl of their activities when visiting the vendors tbr the next month meeting add Nlr. Nlucller could bring some statement from people. Motion bv Tim Bl:lckfiml to recommend to lite Board of ('ountv Commissioners to have the County Attorncv tighten the ordinance 89-1 I. Seconded by (;ill Muellcr. Passed 5/0' c. Track lq. - ~Ir. Mucllcr inquired as m xvhat has happen to thc Track K property. Nix. Ramscv updated Mr. Mucller statim2 that thc I'arks ami Ixccrca,t~m has m~thing to do with Track K because it is not ill thc parks inx'cnmrv and that tile property hchmgs to thc School Board. Beach Parkin~ Fees Updat_e -NIs Ramsev stated th:l! thc Mca has 1101 bccll supporlcd. h. YMCA - *Ir. Xlucllcr stated that they have a new director and they arc doing well for now. IX. ~lon/hiv Report I!. A brief discussion took place regarding tile November and l)cccmbcr monthh' reports. h. FYI - C'hairman Zaks stated that thc F.Y.i. did not rcllcct thc event hc had ;it h'nmokalec which ,,'.'as a success. c. Snowfest- Nil'. Bl:lckford complimented tile department on a job well done but there were limited amount of food 'vcndc~rs Mr. Smith stated that thc vendors wcrc limited because the vendors complained about not making enough money and plus tilex' pay a vendors fi:e of :5250.00. ' ' ' I I I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I Adopt-A-Park Report - A few changes were made with thc park adoption. Tim Blackford will adopt Vineyard and Clam Pass i'ark. Joseph Zaks ,,viii adopt Cocohatchee and l.ely Barctbot Beach: and .Xlr. John Grice will adopt Sugden and East Naples Community l'ark. Mr. Gricc requested a correction be made to thc adoption report thc date is showing 5/27/97. but should read 5,/27/98. Mr. Zaks stated the Veterans Community Park is doing kzrcat bu! requests that thc Parks Recreation Department have thc shcrift' department visit the facility more often. Mr. Zaks stated that he has seen suspicious individuals hanging around thc park and lhcv do mu appear to come there for the enjoyment. Ms. Ramsey stated that she has a meeting with thc Shcril'f l)cp~mmcnt to discuss some issues. Mr. Blackford had a concerned citizen contact him regarding thc usc of thc soccer field he wondered il'the fields are reserved. Ms. Ramsev stated that the fields arc reserved lbr groups or individuals. PARAB Meeting Schedule- The next meeting will be held ~t thc Veterans Community Park. Naples. Florida. February 25, 1998. at 2:00 p.m.. VIII. AI).I()I. IRNMENT Meeting adjourned at 4:31) P.M.. *lotion by Joseph Zaks to adjourn. Seconded bv I)aphnie Bercher. Passed 5/0. I I I I I I I I I I I i I I I i I I I COLLIER COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT RECREATION MONTHLY REPORT JANUARY 1998 FACILITY GG AQUATIC GG FITNESS EAST NAPLES FRANK MACKLE GG COMM CTR VETERANS CP VINEYARDS CP PELICAN BAY GG COMM PARK ATHLETICS RACQUET CTR IiII%lMOKALE E CP MM SPORTS FOOD PROC, PARK/FACILITY USERS CURRENT YEAR MTI- YT£ 4,069 13,17 4,207 13,27: 40,443 193,258 41,240 100,380 31,095 97,884 45,614 169,80 26,476 160,71: 6.94 23,01~ 52.95' 0 0 2,991 10,111 40,306 232,785 19.565 65,547 PRIOR YEAR MTH YTD 3,475 11,12 3,095 8,65, 49,396 211,353 27',000 83,11 17,9,40 58.73; 28,769 105,839 21,120 147,710 10,236 25,874 113,702 402,801 3,765 4,362 1.988 8,608 15,030 221,061 13,812 76,184 REVENUE CURRENT YEAR MTH 4,507 20,605 13,856 41,495 3,497 12,256 12,726 13,384 41237 14,973 43,157 12,588 5;.036 1,545 442C/ o 9,995 34,958 14,474 48 421 2,435 10.620 4.140 12,986 TOTALS 315,898 1,262,229 ---------- 124,568 Athlehc users are already countedin par~facili~ userfigures PRIOR YEAR MTH YTD ~ 16.811 14,867! 28.588 4,25: 15.497 8,43; 22,823 14,151 3,4,778 13,066 ,44. ;82 23,02; 52 NI/: 0 24,189 9,600 39 3,506 7957 3,186 8,990 (B) 9 BEACH AND WATER MONTHLY REPORT m JANUARY 1998 I L~u~CN I YEAR PRl~~'~:.~u= ]AREFOOT '4 361 ~~,~ERS (~T~L~ ' ' ' 7,620 20.142 BB PRESERVE 19,589 53.349 14.6~0 72.850/ CLAM PASS I TIGERTAIL V,~,";DERBILT BCH RD METERS I N GULF SHORE SCIJTH MARCO TOTAL I ]A YVIEW LAKE TRAFFORD I CCCOHATCHEE TOTAL I CONCESSIONS EO;.T LCUNCH CONCESSIONS I TOTAL CONC. E[4CH VENDOR I glTATIONS IGF~ND TOTAL I 23 587 95.387 20,320 20.955 ,=.c 152 2018! 53 472 9.562 47,173 11,059 33.342 3,165 72?5 ., -: 0 7.087 22 1.E01 - 2~ 5.952 18: 5,174 ~8.47 370 4.231 16502 2.E52 2257 ~ I~: 87,782 320,714 89,016 276,57~ ~,548 117.7~! 4~,798 5,033 20,35 3.780 12.9 0 0 0 5518 21,64' 6,784 15.57 0 . 0 17 542 52.84 16.g22 41. ~ 0 15 250 5377 37.176 6~ ~4 ~ 522 ~ 1.~40 3 324 57,608 184.830 80.1C6 182,511 22~0 6 2E~ 2297 ~ ~73 3~C:/ 2 175 4 722 13 719 41 17~1 12~02 15,292 ~,~7, 14.f 78 42.24 0 750 0 I I 1065 2~C0 0 63, 171.S59J 6L27 175.835 ($4,200 of Concess;on re'.,e~ue ~[s =ee~ ~lacec in a trus~ unhl a~reemem concern I I I I (B) 10 I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I 16G RECREATION SECTION MONTIILY REPORT JANL'ARY 199,8 (;OLDEN GATE AQUATIC FACILITY Registered Class Participants 45 Facility Users 40.c} Program I tours Program Participant Itours Revenue Special Events I GOLDEN GATE FITNESS CENTER Registered Class Participants 1_' Facility Users Program ltours Program Participant ltours Revenue Special Events 0 EAST NAI'LES COMMUNITY PARK Registered Class Participants 98 Park Users 40443 Program i IOLJrS Sq ProL-:rarn Participant lhmrs 730 Re~. enue 34,)7 Special Events 75 FRANKMACKLECO.MM PARK Registered Class Participants -'h Park Users 412-:0 Program Hours ,~,~, Program Participant Hours Revenue 12 Special Events 145,) (;¢)LDI'~N (;ATE COMMUNITY CENTER Rc.'4istcrcd Class Particip;mls 22O Facihtx Users 31005 Prob'ram Ihmrs 2)6 Program Participant thmrs 7~20 Re~ cnuc 1338~ Special Events 5500 RACQUET CENTER Registered Class Facility Users Program Flours Program Participant l louts Revenue Special Events VETERANS COMMUNITY PARK Registered Class Participants 5"2 Park t.'sers 45614 Program I tours I *0 Pro?am Participant Hours 47~3 Rexcnue 14073 Special Evems 0 VINEYARDS COM.ML'NITY PARK Registered Class Panicipam,s Park Users 20.:'0 Program Hours 15' Program Participant ttours Revenue 12588 Special Events 131.MOK:~LEE COMMUNITY PARK Registered Class Participants 50 Park Users 40306 Program I tot:rs 60 Program Participant Itours 3000 Revenue 2435 Special [:vents 71) IMMOKALEE Si'ORTS C031PLEX Registered Class Participants I0 Park Users 19565 Program tlours I0 Program Participant Hours lO Revenue 4140 Special Events OOI) (B) 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I GOLDEN GATE AQUATIC & FITNESS CENTER REVENUE REPORT MONTH OCTOBER NOVEMEER DECEMBER JANUARY MARCH ER 166 Pool 4,232 4,232 Fitness n/a n/a Tolals 4,232 4,232 Pool 3,679 7,911 Filness n/a n/a Tolals 3,679 7,911 Pool 3.139 11,050 Fitness n/a n/a Totals 3,139 11,050 Pool 3,872 14,922 Filness n/a n/a Tnlals 3,872 14.92; Pool 3.815 18,73; F~tness n/a nla Tota!s 3.815 18,737 Pool 10,309 29,046 F~tness n/a n/a Totals 10,309 29,04! FY 1995196 3,262 3.262 n/a nla 3,252 3,26: 2,978 6.24~ 4,447 4,44 7,425 10,687 1,294 7,534 2.845 7.292 4,139 14,825 21878 10.412 7,714 15.006 10,..2 25.418 4.503 15 015j 86~5 34 tO3] 6675 2* Cc0/ 3 75,2 22 848~ 10.425 44 538 Pool 12,851 41,89; 11,312 33,002 F~mess n/a n/a 5,204 28.052 Totals 12.851 41,897 16.516 61.05z 3,509 3,509 5,567 5,567 9.076 9,076 3.122 6.631 3.912 9,47 7.034 16,11~ 3,889 10,52¢ 4,342 13,821 8,231 24,341 6.291 16,811/ 14,867 28,688/ 21,158 45.499/ 8,191 16,445 61,944' 18.771 43,83( 5,396 42,27 24,167 86,11 13,784 57,62( 6.978 49,253 20.762 106.87, Poo~ 16,846 58,743 15.256 48 258 28,016 583.63f Fdness nla n/a 4,030 32 05; 6,919 56.17; Tolals 16,846 58,74 19.28,3 80 32,935 139,808 20,540 6879i 3,318 ~"" 23,858 1C4.19~ Pool 19,396 78,13 F;tness n/a n/a ToIals 19,396 78,131 35.210 118,846 8.077 64 43,287 183.09 Pool 12,936 91,07~ 18,424 87,22; 26,017 144,86; FSness n/a n/a 5,181 40.5, 6,290 70,539 Totals 12,936 91,075 23.605 127,80 32,307 215,402 Pool 11,664 102,739 17,195 104.41 19,617 164,480 Fitness n/a n/a 4,833 45,414 7,697 85.877 Totals 11,664 102.739 22,028 149,83 27,314 242.716 Pool 8,704 111,443 11,459 115.871 Fitness n/a n/a 10,078 55,49; Totals 8,704 111,443 21,537 17126; 11.366 175,846 7,641 85,877 19.007 261,723 FY 1997198 6,924 6,924 10,503 10,503 17.427 17.427 4.107 11.031 8,663 19,166J 12.770 30.197I 5,067 16.098I 8.473 ;:7,639l 13,540 43,737 4,508 20.095 13.856 36,150 18,364 5~,24: 2 (B) 12 I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I ! I I I ~OVEMBER DECEMBER JANUARY FE:3RUAR'r' MARCH APRIL MAY JUNE JULY AUGUST SEPTEMBER COLLIER COUNTY RACQUET CENTER REVENUE REPORT FY 1994/95 MTH YTD 5,371 5,371 8,595 13.966 6,722 20,68; 10,432 31,12( 8,176 39,296 6.121 45.41 5,016 50.43: 4,328 54,76 3,918 58.67 3,321 62,000 2.945 64,94~ 4,182 69. FY 1995/96 FY 1996/97 FY 1997/98 MTH YTD MTH YTD MTH 6,173 6,173 12,811 12,811 12,327 18,500 10,434 23,245 5,418 23,918 6,989 30,234 10.001 33,919 9,600 39,83,: 9.719 43,638 8.851 48,685 5.796 49,434 6,156 54.84 6,587 56,021 6,287 61.128 3,817 59.831 4,149 65.277 2.158 61.99~ 3.081 68.358 3,990 65.986 5.489 74.207 4.546 70.53; 7.685 81,892 6,830 77,36; 8,429 90.321 YTD 13,824 ~3,824 13,023 25,847 7,100 33,947 14.474 48,421 (~) 13 I I I I I I I I i I I I I I I I I I I PARKS SECTION .I..%NL'AI~Y 1998 I. Developed. conceptual landscaping improvements tbr parks. 2. Completed conceptual floor plan for dockmaster building at Caxamb;,s. Bid evaluation and award for liehtintz improvements at East Naples and Immokalee Conlnlunitv Parks ' ' 4. Crexvs are currently working on preparing all Little Lea,.,ue softball fields Ibr start of season. - 5. Rcmodelin.; of concession stand at Veterans Roller Hockey Rink in prnccss. hnmokalee practice Ix~seball fidd in final phase of construction. ' IDr:,~ letter sent to the State relating to Sand Dollar Island. 8. Dugout renovations underxvay relative to Tony Rosbou,,h Park in Imrm-kale=.. o Construction continues relative to Suzden Reuional Park scheduled to open Jtl~le of this year. ' ' I0..-\?prc, val for Wilson .Xlillcr to supply design services rclatixe to South Naples Community Park fi~cility. Department of Collier Countt3 Parka Januartj 1998 I and Recreation ,FA ST gA PI,£E COMMUtVITY PA RK I-lundreds of Seniora attended the Senior Social on Januartj 3lat. }.locke9 aeaaon baa started and over 39 tearna are participating. 'Expect Us To Be The FRAAI'K ~. MACKLE, JR. COMMUAtFI'Y PARK The firm of the free concert aeriea at the park took place Januartj 12th with the Gulf ¢oa~ Big Band. Approximatel9 600 people were in attendance. Friends of the Park aponaored the return of the Regal I, ipi~zan Stalliona on the 2igth and 26th of Januartj aa a major fund rai~er for Mackle Park !gO0 people were in attendance. II I I I I GOLD£At GA TE' AOUA IT'~ COMPL£X The Golden Gate Aquatic Complex had a t~tal of 6 colic§ere m~rim team~ practice at the facilit9 over the Chriatmza/New Year~ break Teama form Principia College, l~laa,h, IL; Denniaon Univer- ~itg, ~ranville, Ohio; Univer~t9 of Maine, Orono, Maine; Wheaten College, Wheaten Illinois; Grinnel College, ~rinnel~ Iowa; and Pipon College, I)eppor~ WI came down from 'up north'. Each team ~ent between ? - 10 daga practicing in ~unn~l Collier ¢ount9. On 3anuarg 24th the ¢ommuniit9 Center aponaored the ¢oo1 ¢ruisera Car Show. The event waa a hucje succea~ ig,O00 people attended the ahow. The Communit9 Center ~pomeored a Youth Impact Night on Saturda9, Januar9 :~1~ Thia nicjht waa geared up to help keep kids off the s~reet~ The event conais'~ed of Uve bands, ~game~, and much more. I I I I V£TERAN.9 ~OMMURTI'Y PARK The Roller Iqocke~j Arena is more popular than everl The roller hocke~j fall ~ea~on plaujoffa have finished and a new league ia beginning. During the month of Januar9, 900 Beach Parking Perrnita were issued. VIK£YARDS COMMUNII~ PARK Mom'g Club of Central Naple~ donated a beautiful $' Mahogon9 ahade tree that wa~ placed in the plaggroum& 'During the Men'~ Eoffi>all Igea.qon 4,~00 feet run the ba~e= in a week· (B) 15 I I i i I I I I ! I I I I . I I I I , C ! I I I I I ! I I I I I I I I I ! I I I ADOPT- A- PARK RI'PORT Ihe .'~(I,i)l-A-I):~rk itt'port is I)r()x i(l(,tl I),, fhe I)ark~ and Itt'ereath;rl I(:lch I;.~R..~I~ fllt'Sllber %J%~1% their :idol)ted p:lrk~ :l~]d ~%t'% Ii;irk% condition. The i)tfj'poNe o[ thi~ rej)orl i~ to help Tim Black£ord: Vineyards ComnH, nily Park Coml)lcled on I i{eport on X/Z6/9X a. Immokalee Conlmunily Park I). hnmokalee Recrealion/Aquafic (;il Mueller: ,h)hn (;rice: fl. Frank Mackle Conlmunity Park I). 'Figerlail Beach c. (;oilier County racquel Center a. l':;Isl Naples (7onlmunify P:lrk h. Su~(leJI I~e~ional I):lrk Report on 4/22/98 ;,/;:J . Rel)orl on .~328~98 n. il:tyview Community i'ark I). South Naples Community Park Rel)ort on 6/24198 ,losel)h Z;iks: a. Cocohatchee River Park iL. I,ely Barefoot Beach Rel)ort on 7/22/98 (C) 16 COI.I.IER COUNTY GOVERNMENT PELICAN BAY SERVICES DIVISION flOl LAUREL OAK DRJVE SUITE 6(;5 NAPLES, FL 34108 (941) 597- 1749 FAX (941) 597-4502 A CERTIFIED BLUE (;HIP (.¢ IMMUNITY NOTICE OF PUBLIC MEETING NOTICE IS HERBEY GIVEN OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PELICAN BAY MSTBU ADVISORY COMMITTEE AT THE FOUNDATION CENTER, 8962 HA1M.\IOCK OAK DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108 ON March 4, 1998at3:00 P..%i. AGENDA 2. 3. 4. 5. 7. 8. 9. 10. Roll Call Introduction of new members to the Advisory Committee Election of new Chairman and Vice Chairman for 1998 Approval of Minutes ofthe January 7 and January 26, 1998 Meetin~ Update on the Clam Bay Restoration and Management Plan - T R ffroxvn Discussion on the Oakmont Lake and Ridgexvood Drive lighting replacements Discussion on Year End Report Audience Participation Committee Requests Adjourn ADDITIONALLY, THIS NOTICE ADVISES TItAT, IF A PERSON DECIDES TO APPEAL ANY DECISION MADE BY THE PELICAN BAY ADVISORY COMMITTEE, \\'ITH RESPECT TO ANY MATTER CONSIDERED AT THIS MEETING. HE WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS AND TttAT FOR SUCtt PURPOSE. HE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WttlCH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON \VI ilCH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. PLEASE BRING THE AGENDA PACKAGE MAILED TO YOU FOR FEBRUARY MEETING WITH YOU FOR THIS MEETING. [.: :.' ,,. · Hancock _ /' "''' I,,n',,~ 1~,~. Constant,ne v/~ / Mac'Kte Berry r/ AGENDA -16G COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M.. THURSDAY. M..\RCtt 5, 1998 IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, ADMINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, EAST NAPLES. FLORIDA: NOTE:ANY PERSON WHO DECIDED TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING TItERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICIt THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. THESE MATERIALS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. I. ROLL CALL BY CLERK 2. ADDENDA TO TIlE AGENDA APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 29. 1998 and February 5. 1993 PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES: BCC REPORT 6. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 7. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: Petition No. BD-98-1..Mdes L. Scofield. representing Donald M. Chunlla requesting an IS foot boat dock extension to allow lbr two (2) boat slips and two (2) boat lifts protruding 38 fcc( ,nto thc v. ater,.vay, for property located at 80 Southport Cove. fi~rthcr described as Lot 10. Southport On The Bav. [.'nit 1. in Sec,on 6, Township 48 South. Range 25 East. (Coordinator: Chahram Badamtchianl (Commucd from thc meeting of February 19, 1998) B. Norr i $ Hancock Constantine_._// Mac 'K Se ~"" Petition No. PSP-97-19. Robert L. Self. representing Lake Trafford Independent Bapnst Church. Inc.. requesting Preliminary. Subdivision Plat approval for five mobile home lots to be known as th.': ("arson Road Mobile Home subdivision located on Carson Road at Curry Road. in lmmokalce. Section 31. Township 46 South, Range 29 East. consisting of 3.41 acres. (Coordinator: Ray Bellows} Petition No. PUD-89-41(1), Bruce Tyson. AICP of Wilson, Miller. Barton & Peek. Inc.. representing Shoppes at Santa Barbara. Inc.. requesting a rezone from "PUD" to "PUD". lbr the Planned Unit Development known as Shoppes at Santa Barbara by amending the PUD as required by Section 2.7.3.4 of thc Land Development Code for property, located on the northeast comer of Davis Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard, in Section 4. Township 50 South. Range 26 East. (Coordinator: Susan Murray} D. lfiS 2 I'etmon No. PSP-96-14A. Gary Butler of Butler Engineering. Inc.. representing Rick McCutlough. requesting an amendment to the Preliminary Subdivision Plat known as Sawgrass Subdiv,s~on. by deletinu the requirements for sidewalks, in Section 24. Township 48 South, Range 25 East. Coil/er ('ounp,'. Florida. (Coord,nator: Fred Rcischl) Petition No. R-98-1, Community Development & Environmental SeN'ices Di.,'is,on. representing thc (_'triller County Board of County Commissioners. requesting a rezone from "PUD" Planned Unit Development to "..V' Rural Agricultural for the Neapolitan Park PUD located in the northeast comer of the intersect,on of Da,.'ts Boulevard and Santa Barbara Boulevard. in Section 4. To.,vnship 50 Sm,th. Range 26 East. cons,sung of 20 acres, more or less. (Coordinator: Fred Reischl) [;. Petition No. CU.92-16(1). Commumtv Development and Environmental Services Division representing thc Collier County Board of County Commissioners requesting the deletion of ('ondition "c" as contained m Resolution Number 93-129, which approved CU-92-16. for property located on the south side of U.S. 41. one mile ,,,,'est of S.R. 29. in Sections 26 & 27. Township 52 South. Range 29 l:.ast, cons,sting of 1.016 acres. more or less. {Coordinator: Fred Rcischll (;. Petmon No. PUD-87.31(3), 'Fimothy \\'. Fcrguson and Dominic (;adalcta representing SJG l.and Trust. requesting a rezone from "PUD" to "PI!D" fi~r the Planned Unit Development known as (;ada!~:ta. havlne the effect of amending the Gadaleta PIJD m response to requirements of Sec,ton 2.7.3..1 or' the [.and Development Code. Resolution 97.134. for property located on the west side of Old Tamianu Trail North. ()Id U.S. 41 Norlh IC.R. 807~ and re',mediately conttguous the Lee County bounda~, line ,n Section 10. Townsh,p 48 South. Range 26 East. Collier County. Florida. containing 19.3 a~res, more'or less. I('oc, rdmator: Ron Nino} (Contmucd from thc meeting of Februar3.' 19. 1908~ Il. Petition No. PUD-92-5(2). Mark W. Minor ofQ. (;radv Minor & Associates. I'.A.. representing ('ommunttv Development Corporation of Sterling Oaks. requesting an amendment to the Sterlint, Oaks PI_'[). Ordinanc~ No. 92-79. as amended, for the purpose of clarifying development standards establishing setbacks, and space between buildings for property located within the Sterling Oaks PUD ,.vhit. h is located south of thc Lee County line between [S.S. 41 and Old 41. in Section 9 & I0. Township 48 South. Rang,.' 25 East. Collier County. Florida, containing 247.89 acres. ICoordinator: Ron Nino~ iContinued from thc mectmtz of February 19. 1997 ' ['etmon No. PUD-87-40(3). Douglas a. Wood ofSieskv, Pilon & Wood representing l:allinu Waters Beach Resort. l.imited, requesting an antendmcnt to amend the'Woodficld Lakes PUD for the purpose of changing the name of the PUD: to delete a stipulation requiring an access road from thc project to !'..q. 41 East (Tamiami Trail East) and to rezone 2.5 acres from "A" Rural :\griculmral to "PUl)" Planned Development and to incorporate same into the renamed PUD for propem.' located east of CR. 951 anti on thc north side of U.S. 41. in Section 3. Township 51 South. Range 26 East. ('oilier ('ounb'. Florida. cons,sting 69.32 acres, more or less. (Coordinator: Ron Nino) Petition No. PUD-91-2(I). William R. Vines of Vines & Associates, Inc.. representing Robert S. tlardv. requesting a rezone from PUD to I'UD having the effect of amending thc Northbrookc Plaza to increase tl~e amount of gross floor area devoted to retail/service/offices: revising the number of development tracts from three to two: making other changes tot he PUD to reflect changes that have occurred since the PUD was first approved, and to update references to those in effect, and to amend the Master Plan lbr property located in the northwest quadrant of 1-75 and Naples-lmmokalee Road (C.R. 846), in Section 19. Township 48 South. Range 26 East, containing 43 acres, more or less. (Coordinator: Ron Ninol 8. OLD BUSINESS 9. NE\V BUSINESS 10. DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA 11. ADJOURN 3/$/98 (''cPc AGENDA/md January 29, TRANSCRIPT OF THE JOINT MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSIO~ 1998 AND THE NAPLES PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD Naples, Florida, January 29, 1998 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m. in WORKSHOP SESSION at the Collier County Development Services Complex, ~;aples, Florida,with the following members present: ALSO PRESENT: CHAIRMAN: Michael A. Davis Michael J. Bruet Michael Pedone Donald J. York Edward J. ,Dates Gary Wrage NAPLES PLANNING ADVISORY BOARD CHAIRMAN: James T. Rideoutte Alan R. Korest Stanley Hole Thomas E. Selck John P. Asher Kenneth L. Abernathy Robert Mulhere Ken Heatherington Debra Preston Marjorie Student Page ! 16G January 29, 1998 MR. DAVIS: Why don't we call the meeting to order since we have a tape recorder running now and we're legal and everything. And !et me beqin by welcoming everyone from the City of Naples out here to the County Development Services Complex. We've got -- we've got an agenda here that we can work through. I guess informally we kind of went around and introduced everybody in the room. So we've -- we've gotten past that. Jim, you had mentioned the idea of where we have common borders and zoning that's in contrast or even regulations that are in contrast. I know that the most -- my only opportunity to come down and speak to the PAB just recently, as you may recall, is when you were reviewing a new sign ordinance that we had worked on for the City of Naples, which interestingly -- not necessarily mirrors the County ordinance, but there is a lot of similarities there, which I t?.ink is good in that if you come down some of the corridors we have where the left side is City and the right side is County, I think over a period of time you'll s~art to see at least visually a lot of similarity between the two. Not that Alan and I -- you know, we're still in a little disagreement on the neon, but we'll get past that. MR. ABERNATHY: Mike, since you're recording this, do you need to take a roll? I don't know how formal -- MR. DAVIS: Yeah. If we've got it on there probably -- it probably would be a good idea. I'll identify the people that are present from the Collier County Planning Commission. ~4yself, Chairman Mike Davis, Vice-chairman Mike Bruet, Secretary Don York Gary Wrage Mike ?edone and Ed Oates. ' ' And if you'd like to do the same, Jim. MR. RIDEOUTTE: Identify those from the City that. are here~ MR. DAVIS: Yeah. ' NR. RIDEOUTTE: Well, I'm Jim Rideoutte, the Chairman. Ken Abernathy, John Asher, Tom Selck, Stanley Hole, Alan Korest. MR. HOLE: You've got them all. ~,~R. RIDEOUTTE: Okay. ~R. DAVIS: Everyone having been given a copy of _h_ agenda, is there any item that seems to have more appeal than ano[ker to anyone here? I guess the idea of the [4PO overview was to maybe focus in on some common planning issues as maybe a starting point for us all to work from. I guess, Jim, my thought was that hopefully we can just -- because we're all around the table here and just kind of keep it an open discussion -- SIR. RIDEOUTTE: Sure. ?IR. DAVIS: -- and thoughts as they occur to one another. Bob, as far as the MPO, we've got -- ~4R. MULHERE: Yeah. Ken, if you just want to introduce yourself and then give them a little bit of an overview. ~4R. HEATHERINGTON: Sure. ~4R. MULHERE: Whatever you have planned. MR. HEATHERINGTON: Good morning. Again, my name is Ken Heatherington. I'm the new MPO coordinator. Many of you have been Page 2 January 29, 1998 here longer than I. I have been the coordinator for nine months to replace Jeff Perry, who you may have had an opportunity to work with previously. Bob extended an invitation so that we can come in and just talk abou5 an agency that is multi-jurisdictional. We serve responsibilities for all the cities and the County, as gives us a really unique perspective on looking at our work program. I'll hand out a couple brochures on just -- I'm sure that you know who the MPO is and how that works. The past chairman was Councilman VanArsdale from the City. At the last election here at the meeting on Friday Chairman Constantine -- Commissioner Constantine from the County was elected chair. Peter VanArsdale is still vice-chair. Peter is also the Metropolitan Planning Advisory Com~mittee representative o _hr Stat~ organization with Commissioner Hancock being the alternate ~or fha' particular entity. I'll also hand out kind of an outline of what our work program is. It might help just to look at some of the issues that we're working together on. I started at the top with major projects. One of the things that's been unique to the community is that we've not had an opportunity to work with mass transit or public transit. There have been a number of proposals in the past to address the issue. The Board of Collier County Commissioners in the past was not real anxious 5o undertake that endeavor. I did have an opportunity to talk to the Board of County ?ommissioners and ask that we, once again, look at public transit. They did approve an amendment to our work program. We've subsequently contracted with the Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, to do a five-year transit development plan. This does not mean that transit will be guaranteed at the end cf this nine-month study period. It simply looks at what the alternatives are, what some of the operation and capital costs may be, whether this community supports it publicly, whether we can afford financially. So it will be a nine-month process. We're waiting for final word from the Federal Transit Administration on our funding opportunities. FTA has been banking our 5309 dollars and section eight dollars since 1992. We have over $160,000 in federal funds to expend in this community reviewing %ransit. And they've provided S100,000 in our next work program begin ~his process. Yes, sir. MR. ABERNATHY: This is an organizational question. The literature says it's a legislative body with the power to deve!oD and adop~ plans and so forth. ' Who established the MPO; the State or the County~ Where did come from? ' MR. HEATHERINGTON: It's established by federal law, as well as State law. U.S. Code 23 and 49 of the federal code establishes the Page 3 January 29, !998 metropolitan planning process through the U.S. Department of Transportation. The State of Florida has also codified our responsibilities with Chapter 339. ~4R. ABERNATHY: Who says that there should be two ~;aples City Council persons and five County commissioners? Does the County say that or the State? MR. HEATHERINGTON: There is a -- it's a governor's decision actually. MR. ABERNATHY: Governor. MR. HEATHERINGTON: But we sit down jointly with %he local communities and apportionment is based kind of on population representation. And we look at an apportionment plan ~hat considers the population of the two communities. We're beginning the process with the City of ~.{arco. :.iR. ABERNATHY: Is that going to change things? [,IR. HEATHERINGTON: It :nay. Part of that is up to City Council of Marco Island. D~ck Shanahan you may know is the intergovernmental relations person. We're going to sit dow~ and start talkir, g about what is involved in apportionment, what their responsibilities are and what we can bring back to them in a multi-jurisdictional format if they are represented on the board. MR. ABERNATHY: Excuse me for interrupting. [~R. HEATHERINGTON: No problem. Anytime. Everglades City as well -- while there is only 300 people there -- are looking at possibly trying to join representation as wel~ Yes, sir. ' -' MR. PEDONE: Where does your funding come from? MR. HEATHERINGTON: 100 percent federal funds. MR. PEDONE: Federal? MR. HEATHERINGTON: Yes, sir. Our budget is about $450,000. There is a local match that governments participated in the, past, both County and City. However, because the toll district, 'i!.s~rict eight, is generating such great revenues, about three years ago the State decided they would soft match all MPO activities through the toll district funds, eliminating a local match. - also?MR. HOLE: Are you the director for Collier or do you handle Lee area.MR. HEATHERINGTON: Just Collier. Collier is our metropolitan }~R. ABERNATHY: That's how you define it; the whoie County? ~,{R. HEATHERINGTON: Yes, sir. I believe in 1992 ~here was a reapportion when the City Council joined. And at that ~ime the idea was to expand the metropolitan urban boundary to the County line. And it's typical in many of the MPO activities across the State. MR. DAVIS: With Collier County MPO I can appreciate the road networking situations thai would involve both the City and the County. That makes sense. There is the bigger view. is there a next step to where if we're looking at road networks that involve both Lee and Collier County? MR. HEATHERINGTON: Actually, our model that we use -- the Page 4 Z I January 29, 1998 Florida State Urban Transportation Model -- to generate traffic assignments zonal data based on socioeconomic information is a bi-co~.~y model. It includes a large portion of the Lee County model. As a matter of fact, I was just with Glen Alhert this morning. We were talking about updating each other's data sets since we're working on similar projects. You've heard about the i-75/Golden Gate project. We had the opportunity in working with the Department of Transportation to again enter with URS/Greiner as a consultant on that project to update our transportation model. The planning staff on the comp section here has been working with us updating our socioeconomic inputs to look at what trips are generated by the employment and residential growth in this community through the year 2024. Glen Albert has just updated the south section of their mc'de!. We're going to try to bring that data set back in to see if ~hat's impacting any of the assignments or travel patterns between the two counties. As you know, there is probably about a 35 percent distribution of trips from the Southwest International Airport into Lee County. Our previous model wasn't experiencing that as well as the new model. Again, some of the technology and updates in the model have allowed us to go back and trace those trips to see how well we're replicating the distribution through the two county area. And this last effort which we're currently working with our MPO on actually has replicated about 30 percent of the trips that originate from the airport and distributes them back in this network to Collier County. You can actually watch this happen on the model when t'ney do some of the simulation traces. Yes, sir. MR. YORK: What's in -- in your current view, what does it look like for the interchange at Golden Gate and the interstate? MR. HEATHERINGTON: Given the crossing volumes that we have at Pine Ridge and Airport Road, the volumes that we're getting at 951, it looks pretty good really. There are a number of other thresholds, rather than just ramp volumes. There is -- MR. HOLE: You mean positive for the interchange when you say it looks pretty good? MR. HEATHERINGTON: Positive for the interchange, yeah. Again, looking at relief to Airport and some of the crossing volume intersections, the only way we're going to do that is by redistributing some of the stretches at another entrance to the community. And Golden Gate will provide that opportunity, as well as ~he connection with Livingston now is another way. That connection is coming in from Radio to Golden Gate. There will be some new links added to the system ,and '..:e certainly need use of all links in this community. Obviously we have a very limited north-south, east-west network. And any improvements we can make to that distribution I think will be of great benefit. Now, FHWA is going to come back in and look at the Pine Ridge/I-75 interchange and 951 interchange and do their cost-benefi~ Page 5 analysis. They can come in and make improvements at those interchanges that would help deliver traffic and at a better cost than coming in and putting in a full interchange. The problem, again, would be we would still be distributing that traffic at Airport and Pine Ridge and at 951 where we have tremendous problems now, let alone 25 years in the future. Yes, sir. MR. HOLE: I am wondering why the County doesn't seem particularly interested in smoothing the traffic over Airport Road with flyovers and get rid of those long traffic jams with the traffic lights. Is that a political issue more than a traffic issue? MR. HEATHERINGTON: I would suggest it is. We are going to work with the Board of County Commissioners. In our modeling process one of the things we asked the consultant to do is go back again and identify those intersections where the crossing volumes exceed 100,000. We then want to come back in and look at some TSM improvements. Are there things that we can do to improve the intersection? If not, does it mean you need to address an overpass or you're going to have delays at that intersection? MR. HOLE: Overpasses can be nice. MR. HEATHERINGTON: Yeah. Absolutely. MR. HOLE: It really can. MR. DAVIS: We just need to get the first one, Stanley. MR. HOLE: All right. MR. HEATHERINGTON: Some people talk about the one at Goodlette-Frank over the WCI property as being an example of something that could be done. ' MR. HOLE: It's there. MR. HEATHERINGTON: The concern, again, is have we given away too much right-of-way at some of the intersections where we need to accomplish that and building a list of priorities in areas where it may be accomplished and to look at how that might solve some of our future delays. ~4R. HOLE: Good luck. ~R. HEATHERINGTON: It is going to be an interesting challenge. There are some interesting models out there to be familiar wi~h that do traffic simulation. It's a little glass bead activity with cars. And you can actually see what the impact is visually. And we think if we go back and do some in-depth intersects modeling, show the examples of what happens, what tke cuing times are and you can see it happening in real time, that may begin to change their opinions. And we'll get through the election year and see how that happens, as well. ~4R. DAVIS: it's been interesting with the bridge construction ~us~ ~o actually experience how it impacts intersections that are so far away. I mean, I've heard staff members when we talk about traffic analysis and stuff like that -- they talk about if you do something here and it affects over here way far away. With the bridge we are seeing that firsthand, aren't we? Particularly here on Airport Road. Page 6 16G-2 January 29, 1998 MR. HOLE: One of the problems addressed by the trustees of the hospital was the emergency problems. It was jammed up back down to Rattlesnake-Hammock Road. How do you get from here to there? MR. DAVIS: I sit on our EMS advisory board. There has been a lot of discussion about that. And, of course, the helicopter was the answer for most of those cases. It's simply going to fly over. But there is only one helicopter. ~4R. HOLE: Do you like flyovers? MR. HEATHERINGTON: There was some discussion yesterday at a meeting we had with the partners in that project; DOT, the contractors, the communities and EMS. Diane was there, as well. The County, I believe, is going to do some emergency lane stripping along Davis as part of this, which will get them through that bottleneck at one location. ~,~R. HOLE: Well, it's really loaded ~orth Collier Hospital. People are zipping up 951 and getting across, rather than trying to fight their way in. ~.IR. DAVIS: Bill Friend told me that there was even some consideration or discussion with the idea of putting an emergency clinic -- MR. HOLE: Right. MR. DAVIS: -- there at the East Trail area. So, you know, that may come to pass before it's over. MR. HEATHERINGTON: We'll be watching the traffic through the height of the tourist season. Right now it seems to be moving rather well. There's very few complaints. The travel times are somewhere between 11 and 20 minutes through that major bottleneck, which doesn't seem to be a great difficulty. MR. PEDONE: Unless there is somebody making a turn into Boat Haven or the Naples Yacht Club. MR. HEATHERINGTON: That was exactly brought up yesterday. The biggest problem is the left turn movement into the -- exactly. blR. PEDONE: What they should do is have them turn towards Landry's and come around and wait at the light for the light to change before they can get across. MR. HEATHERINGTON: Yes. That is exactly what should happen. You're right. That was raised yesterday as being a bottleneck in that whole movement. MR. PEDONE: Because I'm always in the wrong lane. No matter which one I get in it's the one that stops. ~4R. MULHERE: Did you touch on -- I am not sure. Did you touch on the feasibility study relative to the -- just an issue that doesn'~ generate any interest. The State feasibility study and where we stand on the second Gordon River bridge crossing again, is there anything going on with that right now at any level? [.tR. HEATHERI~GTON: Well, there are things going on. The ~apies Airport is working on the North Road relocation as providing additional access to the southwest corner of their development there. it happens to line up with one of the old corridor alignments for the Gordon River bridge crossing at Central Avenue. Page 7 lbG 2 January 29, 1998 Again, obviously that's a tough situation too politically and with communities and with the airport authority. I think they recognize that while they're doing North Road they may as well at least consider that option and the community will decide that in the future. It may be a connection at some point in time that is a pedestrian crossing, but not a vehicular crossing. We don't know. Again, they are looking at the alignment. CHM-2 who was one of the original contractors has been hired, I believe, by the airport to help with the North Road relocation, as well. The Florida Department of Transportation -- again, the Gordon River bridge crossing was ranked as one of the second highest priorities by the Metropolitan Planning Organization last year in the priority setting process. That was a public process that involved citizen involvement at the Home -- Home Depot -- at the Depot last year when we had a transportation forum, as well as input by the Citizens Advisory Committee and the Technical Advisory Committee. We didn't do a great deal of outreach to the City of Naples in any form of survey to find out what the public comment was on that, but through our advisory process that was still ranked as an issue to be looked at. The Florida Department of Transportation, in putting together their five-year tentative work program, looked at that as a priority and said, "We'll address it in-house somehow. It is really not appropriate for the department to fund that when we don't know what the community is going to want to do with it %~his is a local driven process." ' We recognize that it may happen. We're prepared in-house to provide some assistance to the consultants and the airport and the community as we go through this. But it is not on a~y identified work program with the department. HR. YORK: You mentioned that the Livingston Road segment between Radio Road and Golden Gate Parkway is kind of -- in the immediate planning, which I think would alleviate a lot of traffic off of Airport Road, especially through Naples Production Park. What is the plan for the section between -- on Livingston Road between Gelden Gate and Pine Ridge? My thoughts are i£ we do do an interchange at Golden Gate -- an 1-75 interchange -- that you almost don't even need that road between Golden Gate and Pine Ridge. HR. HEATHERINGTON: That's a tough one. Again, there are so few parallel facilities to 1-75, Airport and 41 that that's still an important link in the distribution of traffic over a large geographical area. Recognizing the opposition to that link from some of the homeowners associations through there, I believe the County has started a rather intensive partnering process and is beginning to sit down with homeowners and talk about buffering, landscaping and things that would make that an amenable two-lane facility initially, possibly four lane. ! think the footprint remains at four lanes, though they're purchasing right-of-way for an ultimate six-lane facility. A lot of that is just going to depend on community growth. Again, it's a fact that we have very few segments in this network that provide arterial connection. It may become an important one. Page 8 January 29, 199~ 6G Particularly when we look on the north end with Livingston coming off of im.~okalee Road, you know, that project may happen sooner or later because it is being driven by development. Ukere is an agreement in the works between Lee County and its connection at Imperial at Bonita Beach Road with the community here to make tkat project happen. You will have two links on either end and it still may be a critical -- critical connection in the future. A lot of it will be timing on demand and we'll monitor congestion management and turning movements throughout the community. Part of it will be the success of the partnering exercise being undertaken by the County. MR. HOLE: Don, there is one group that says you don't want to you 'want to do whatever you can, which would include the Livingston, zo eliminate 1-75 as a local street. So that would tend to ke-~p people from going up 1-75 to get up to come back over. >IR. HEATHERINGTON: Yes. Again -- MR. HOLE: It's an issue. >IR. HEATHERINGTON: We're looking at six-laning !-75 sooner than had been discussed previously. In the last 2020 plan 1-75 wasn't ~iscussed. More of that was policy driven than technology model driven at the time, but we use model driven as the excuse today to explain why now it shows up as beginning to fill early in the 2000s and by 2010 actually would end up being -- would need the six lanes. Our current model shows it being six laned down to Pine Ridge in the 2020 model, I believe. So there will be continued growth on 1-75 in through traffic. And use of an arterial, regardless of what the statewide ~olicy is, does drive the need for that parallel facility of Livingston. Some of the other issues very quickly. I won't take much of your time. Again, I mentioned the reapportionment and discussion with the City of Marco. M?O rules and regulation and bylaws. In recognizing the reapportionment issue, we went back and asked some questions about bylaws. I had been here about six months and hadn't pulled them open yet. ? was kind of embarrassed by that. When - finally found them they went back to 1982. So we thought it may be time to really address al! of the advisory committees how we operate and take that as a major undertaking, in addition to the reapportior~ment plan this year, 'with the governor's office. Public involvement strategies. We recognize that our agency disseminating information to the public is an important undertaking. And ~ have mentioned here !'ye actually gone out for some professional ~1~ recognized tha~ we couldn t do it with the three staff peo~ie we ha';e in-house. We ',,.'ant to, as part of our reapportionment, look at our logo which kind of is nondescript at this time and create an identity for the Metropolitan Planning Organization. Again, we feel very strongly as a multi-jurisdictional entity that we can serve this community. We have put together a few brochures to try and enlighten the public. We have a great deal of speaking engagements to homeowners Page 9 2 January 29, 19~ 2 associations and professional assoCiations in the area. And our newsletter should be released soon. ~4R. ABERNATHY: You could probably enlighten the people or the public if you changed your name and made it Metropolitan Transportation Planning Organization. I would think -- some people may think you do o[her things. You don't seem to. MR. HEATHERINGTON: Primarily transportation, yeah. We're always involved in the land use transportation relationship, but our mission is -- MR. ABERNATHY: Transportation. MR. HEATHERINGTON: There is one that did that in Polk. They called it the Polk TPO, the TransDortation Planning Organization. It can be done. That may be something that -- :~R. ABERNATHY: It would be more descriptive I think. ~.IR. ASHER: It does confuse people. ~4R. DAVIS: Yeah, it does. Good point. r~R. HEATHERINGTON: We will take that into consideration as we go through this discussion. I mentioned the Collier County transportation study. That's one of our major responsibilities keeping that cost feasible plan at a current horizon. Our horizon currently being 2020. We now have new data set to take it all the way to 2024 based on the work we are doing towards the 1-75 interchange. And we're asked to do a new update by December of the year 2000, which is not so far away given the amount of work that goes into that development. The 1-75/Golden Gate interchange. I mentioned that study. The Immokalee area. We currently have a mobility study going on out there looking at some of the needs for pedestrian traffic, bicycle traffic, as well as the alternate 29 Madison and how can we better serve that mixed use that goes on in that particular locatior with the packing plants and the residential. And it may undertake a little more in-depth corridor study at that point. The Florida scenic highway program. As you know, U.S. 41 from the Collier State Preserve Park to the Dade County line is currently being considered for designation as a scenic highway. We have completed the application and are in the second phase of that program, which is developing an in-depth corridor management plan which includes participation by the private sectors and businesses impacted by this process along the -- along the Trail. That's been a very engaging process. There is a lot of involvement -- qrass roots involvement that is driven by the Corridor Advocacy Group, CAG. We°!l be having our next meeting the end of February out in Everglades City to talk about some of the impacts and designation for the communities. >~R. ABERNATHY: What are the negatives; people slowing down %rying to see? ~.IR. HEATHERINGTO~;: Negatives may be in perception only, that we're going to come back with a series of zoning overlays or requirements or business restrictions for the handful of private proper~y owners along there, that we would wan[ to come back and limit Page !0 January 29, 1998 uses of -- of land adjacent to the roadway. MR. ABERNATHY: So as to not destroy the scenery? NR. HEATHERINGTON: Right. There is a State mandate that the Tamiami Trail designation has a corridor that's as large as the vista. And that concerns some people in its description in that you may come back in and ask them to remove signs or cut down Brazilian peppers to improve the vista. ' It's an educational process and that's why we hope to continue with the public meetings. The Florida Department of Transportation is providing professional consulting services in the corridor management plan. The firm of Jackson -- MS. PRESTON: Gladding Jackson. MR. HEATHERINGTON: Gladding Jackson. Thanks. Ns. Preston is also assisting our staff in the public involvement and development of the corridor management plan. :4R. HOLE: How do the Indians, with their destination resorts, and Everglades City feel about that? ~4R. HEATHERINGTON: There are people that recognize in Everglades City that this could be an economic benefit for their community, as well. Part of the idea is to attract more tourism to the community. There are others that perceive this as a negative, that there may be something that is going to restrict uses of their land. So, again, through the educational process -- and one of the reasons we are going for the first public involvement meeting on this part of it to Everglades City is to make sure that there is a better understanding of what the mission and purpose of designation is and how it may benefit that community. MR. HOLE: Are the Miccosukees at the table yet? I me~n, they always get involved in water resource issues. I am just wondering. MR. HEATHERINGTON: They have attended a number of the meetings. We asked them to officially become members of the CAG and they have decided not to do that. NR. HOLE: Typical. NR. HEATHERINGTON: We send all of the information about the corridor management plan and the creation of a corridor management entity to tribal council, as well as to the persons that have attended the meetings. So we try to keep the native tribes informed of what is going on. The opportunity for them to participate always exists. And we think, again, there may be opportunities through other grants and whatnot to enhance some of the -- some of their housing and the destinations that are along the Trail today. What else do we have here? Comprehensive pathway plan. One of our responsibilities in the MPO -- this is one of our multi-jurisdictional programs -- is the bicycle/pedestrian pathway program. We work very closely with the City and the County in looking at %he opportunity for improved bicycle and walking activities. NR. OATES: I happen to be a member of the Southwest Florida Land Preservation Trust, as Stanley was for awhile. And our Greenway project is moving along quite well, Stanley, you would be interested to know. Page 11 We have gotten into the airport master plan. They've committed to give us some property through there. We have two ISTEA fundings for, I think, '99 and 2000 of 250,000 each coming up Goodlette Road. So tkat eventually will be -- come into play. We're going after you for some money, by the way. MR. BRUET: We haven't heard from you in awhile. MR. OATES: We'll be back. MR. BRUET: Okay. MR. HOLE: Hopefully you're trying to combine bikers and walkers. In Colorado they've got biking areas where you can really let out and get your 20 or 30 miles out. They don't let walkers on there because they have a tendency to get -- MR. DAVIS: Run over. MR. HOLE: Killed is an overstatement. It is a bad mix for serious bikers and walkers. It really is. MR. HEATHERINGTON: Well, I happen to have a -- the bike/ped coordinator is a real advocate of this program -- MR. HOLE: Okay. MR. HEATHERINGTON: -- and would like to see -- MR. HOLE: So he understands. MR. HEATHERINGTON: He understands, but there are some real constraints. It's financial, as much as land use in this community. The current funding for the improvement of the pedestrian and sidewalk and bicycle path lays with the transportation department. They have a 313 fund. The Board of County Commissioners is gracious enough ~o provide us a quarter of a million dollars, $250,000 a year. That simply doesn't go very far in today's construction costs. We have a list of needs that goes about this long, including maintenance. And that current funding simply doesn't allow for many innovative solutions to some of this. One thing we are working in conjunction with the Greenway programs is the Southwest Florida Water Management District in looking at the canals. There is an issue with liability in the County of maintaining that easement, but the water management district is looking at providing access to those canals for their own purposes and would like to work with the County and the communities in possibly using some of those as multiuse pathways, as well. One, in fact, is along the Golden Gate canals. There is some discussion going on now with the water management districts in the County to introduce those as alternative multi-paths where you may be able ~o do some better biking. MR. HOLE: Fifteen years ago the water management district and the County and maybe the State too reached agreement on that big Dade park. And they used C-41s -- well, they used a number of canal rights-of-way; one side for high-speed bikers and the other side for everybody else. MR. HEATHERINGTON: if there is such an agreement, i'!l have to have -- MR. HOLE: About 15 years ago. Page 12 16G 9_ January 29, 1998 MR. HEATHERINGTON: I will see if that exists. I.IR. HOLE: Dade County Park Department initiated it. F~R. HEATHERINGTON: There certainly may be some opportunities %o create some real bike pathways. There are a number of conflicts between the bicyclists and walkers. We recognize that is a problem. ~4R. HOLE: Yes. 14R. HEATHERINGTON: New projects that we are thinking about. Again, the ISTEA Act of 1991 has asked MPOs to look at freight and truck hauling movements. We have not done that here. Recently there is some inquiries by the Economic Development Council, as well as our look into Immokalee with the alternate State Road 29 corridor and the Tamiami Trail issue, have pointed out that maybe we need to go out and look at some data for truck route movements in this community. There seems to be an increase of traffic along U.S. 41 to the east of the County. We don't know if they are avoiding the interstate because of the tolls or if it's just a better destination into south Dade. But we're going to try and undertake a little greater study of freight and truck movements throughout the community. Another one is the non-urban Estates. They're growing rapidly and have very few connections, as well. They're driven by the canals that separate us into long cul-de-sacs with very few loading opportunities. We have been asked by the Board of County Commissioners and the transportation planning department actually to maybe jointly go back in and look at the Estates and see if there is some thy. ngs we can do to improve safety, increase access and provide for long-term growth in that area. Transportation data management. We have -- we are the transportation disadvantage coordinator and have purchased some expensive software for Good Wheels to use in scheduling, dispatching the transportation disadvantage program. We are the licensed owner of blapInfo, which is a GIS program that's part of that system. It's compatible with ArcInfo and other GIS systems that are being used in the community. Geographical information systems. The Florida Department of Transportation has taken an initiative as we!! to provide greater data management through GIS to the MPO planning process. We hope this year to embark a little more deeply into actually the technology and applying geographical information system technology to our data management tools and bring things up in the real-time environment. MR. HOLE: Which software do you use? ~R. HEATHERINGTON: MapInfo. ~R. ASHER: Is there any coordination with the City? Z mean, i know the City's got a pretty solid GIS database. In my work as an engineer I think Collier County is behind a lot of the other communities in having information available to -- for anyone. I can call up to Lee County and figure out what size the water meter is and where everything is on any property if I know an address, a name. I mean, it's amazing what you can do and what you can't do down here Page 13 1 6G January 29, 1998 in Collier County. MR. HEATHERINGTON: You're right, John. Susan Overstreet is one of the greatest resources i think we have in %he community with what she's been doing for the City and their GIS project. We had sat down -- we, being Larry Lawrence from the property appraiser's office, Susan Overstreet and myself. I was appointed by the governor in '95 to sit on the statewide geographic information systems board, formerly the BMAC out of the governor's office and was an officer in the Florida URISA chapter for a number of years. So I had some connections and we thought that we would be able to move an interlocal agreement forward between the property appraiser's office, the City and the County, but it kind of got blocked. When we talked about an interlocal agreement all of a sudden that became too political and everybody just kind of went their own way. And for the last three months we haven't been in much communication. Susan is busy moving her program forward. The County is moving. I am not sure if it is forward or not at times. One of the things that was important at that particular meeting when we all sat down -- and Susan was behind a lot of this. We don't have a common base map for geodetic control. There is nothing to tie the information. Even all the work that the City has done is not tied to a county-wide geodetic foundation. Our first thought was if somebody wanted to fund a project the one they ought to fund is going out and doing monumentation of the County and doing a one, three-mile grid so that we have the geodetic foundation to tie a base map to, along with all our suf,division information, along with all the property appraiser files that are being scanned as part of Larry's work in the GIS entity. Until we have that geodetic foundation and a coordinated base map that everybody ties data to, we're still all going in different directions. I will be tying my data probably to a TIGER file in the State point coordinate system which does not have the amount of detail needed for really a county-wide coordinated system, but will be compatible in a planned metric fashion to whatever happens in the future. But it's important, I think, that -- if there is something we could do multi-jurisdictional, it would be undertaking a consultant's study. Department of Revenue provides 50 percent of the matching funds to do that. They have talked about coming here and doing a presentation to organizations like yourself to explain the benefits of a coordinated multi-jurisdictional GIS and how some of that funding could come from the federal government, as well as part of the revenue in ~he State. But I think one of the missing links is that geodetic foundation to build any of our information upon. Ongoing projects. As i mentioned earlier, we're responsible for the transportation improvement program and priority setting from all the jurisdictions and local agencies. Every May we send out a letter and ask for your priorities, begin a public involvement process at that %ime which leads us to December and a tentative five-year work Page 14 January 29, 1998 program from the Florida Department of Transportation. As well we do the concurrency management and traffic monitoring for the County under our level of service analysis in the AUIR report. i forget what that stands for. MR. HOLE: Has the council got that letter -- MR. HEATHERINGTOM: I'm sorry, sir. MR. HOLE: The letter requesting priorities, does unat go to the City Council also? MR. HEATHERINGTON: Yes, yes. Yes, it does. One other thing, too, about our priorities. We have a few State roads and we still have $20 million a year coming in. We're beginning to fund a lot more off-system projects, including pathways and bicycle activities. There may be some opportunities to even take some other things off system and fund some of the County road constructicn programs we're looking at this year and what some other opportunities might be. Although~ %he 1-75 interchange project, at a cost of about $20 million, will absorb a considerable amount of money over the next few years. Another one of the projects that's multi-jurisdictional is the optimization of the signalization system. You know we're moving into some high technology. There's a joint committee now that is working on that with the transportation department. That may provide one of our best tools for managing traffic in the near future is that coordination of signals and real-time dispatching of information from the intersection. That will be a very interesting project. I saw a letter yesterday to the DOT asking for additional funding for phase two of that project from the department, which is not currently in our work program. MR. HOLE: How much County money would be lost because of Marco; a bunch of zeros or just a few zeros? MR. MULHERE: You're talking about revenue sharing? MR. HOLE: Yes. MR. !4ULHERE: I am not sure of the exact figure, i'd probably -- at best it would be a guess at this point in time. >!R. HOLE: Four zeros or five? MR. MULHERE: Five. MR. HOLE: Thank ~ou. MR. MULHERE: I think maybe 1.5 million, but I'm'not 100 percent MR. HOLE: That's okay. I just want to get a feel. MR. HEATHERI~GTO~;: The other project mentioned earlier is ISTEA enhancement dollars. Ten percent of the district funds are preserved for ISTEA projects, which equates to about $300,000 a year here in Collier County. We have an open application process each spring again for enhancement projects. We work very closely with a number of associations throughout the planning. Congestion management. We were required as of October i to have a congestion management system in place. We have one in place. ! don't know if it's only in terms of having a document on the shelf. It's not actually. Page 15 January 29, 1998 One of the issues Chat came out of that were the level of service tables. There was some discussion with the Livingston Road connection. At one time the State had level of service tables, somebody else had level of service tables and never the three shall meet. The idea was to go out and build a level of service table that would be consistent with the needs of the community and everyone would agree upon those capacities stated in thaC document to use in future concurrency management issues. That's all I'm doing right now. Plummer and Associates are still under contract for that work. ~.~R. KOREST: One question on that level of service. Are the City and the County using the same level of service standards? MR. HEATHERINGTON: I would like to give you an honest answer to that. ~4R. KOREST: i don't believe they are. I don't believe t~ey are. 2 jus% wondered° i've always wondered why they didn't. ~4R. HOLE: That would make it exciting when one rcad goes across the County line. MR. HEATHERINGTON: I will ask George about that to make sure that we are related in the information that we gather. Again, always highway safety and management programs to that effect are continuing to take place. I hope that wasn't too quick. I certainly appreciate the opportunity to come before you today. MR. KOREST: One last question dealing with the buildout numbers. Two or three years ago the buildout numbers were reduced by University of Florida and the projection was reduced to something like 390,000 for 2025 or 2030 from a number closer to 500,000. Is that still in place or has that changed? MR. HEATHERINGTON: That's a moving target. ~4R. KOREST: And you can't hit it. ~4R. HEATHERINGTON: There is probably three or four different projections out there for different time periods. I believe the buildout scenario was still at about 500,000. But there have been interim population projections based on some changes in zoning and densities that reduced the population to a certain extent. The population for the 2024 model, I believe, was about 400,000 at tha~ point. And it was an interpolation of existing population data to still that buildout population data set potential. And that is a potential that may flatten as that curve gets further out to the future. ~.~R. DAVIS: We've seen more and more projects -- or the trend that has been in the County and I think what we've observed the las~ several years is while the development is approved for -- there are four units per acre in place for that land and the PUD comes in that's maybe 1.8 or 1.9 so that the potential for four units an acre is now ~aken away. Of course, once it is approved. And that seems -- you know, seems to be what the market is striving to. MR. YORK: Well, Mike, aren't we seeing that, you know, when the sun sets that the densities are reduced from what they originally were? Page 16 January 29, 1998 ~.IR. DAVIS: We had one recently on County Barn Road that was approved for -- >!R. YORK: Six. >!R. DAVIS: I don't know. . r thought it was eight units an acre or something. And by the sun setting it was returned I think to estates, which is one for two and a quarter or two and a half acres or something like that. So we're starting to see a lot of that happen. ~.~R. ASHER: And if someone comes back they'll get maybe three or four at best if they go to rezone it. ~!R. DAVIS: Exactly. So you net a lot less units. In fact, we had one meeting -- there were several hundred units that ended up being taken off the development table with several petitions that we saw that day. MR. 'fORK: And that's got to have a significant impact those ~uture numbers out there. ~ >!R. HEATHERINGTON: We're continuously looking at that, again, working with the comprehensive planning staff. Dave Weeks spent probably about three weeks going back reviewing all the previous PUDs and adjustments and looking at where we could reduce the zonal numbers based on ended projects. And it did have some change in emplo~vment numbers, as well as population. And we'll continue to plug that into the new data sets as we continue to refine that model. MR. DAVIS: Commissioner Hancock -- and a lot of you have probably read his paper or heard him speak -- has generally an idea of where we look in say how -- Stanley's flyovers and how many of those can we tolerate as a community and what will we accept in the way of a road network and infrastructure and then back that up to some density that fits. I am oversimplifying, of course, but generally that's sort of the thought pattern. So there is obviously a lot of discussion in the County about density and what it is going to end up being. MR. HEATHERINGTON: In moving that forward quickly, we have been asked to make a report to the Board of County Commissioners and the :dPO in February and will do so. URS/Greiner has helped us on the 1-75 project and has agreed to help again on modeling another density scenario. As that data is set in hand now, we expect to get back a report from them within the next couple of weeks on the impact of lowering the population by -- i don't remember what the number was it was about 100,000. ' ~IR. ~ULHERE: ! believe so. ~R. HEATHERINGTON: By about 100,000 persons and looking at what the impact is of that population data set and the reduction in densities along some of the urban fringe on the network. And we'll provide that report back to you, as well. ~R. HOLE: I think one of the problems is that a lot of people in Collier don't know what flyovers look like. You know, they don't understand that roads jam packed with vehicles can be turned into wide boulevards. And there are some good examples on the east coast. You hate to mention them because there is always east coast and west coast. There are some very, very nice transportation systems in place Page 17 January 29, over there that put most of ours to shame, as far as apparent congestion. Just go to the end of -- end of Sawgrass and turn east. Ail of a sudden it gets off this road car to car to car to car to cheek to jowl and all of a sudden you're a boulevard mentality. MR. DAVIS: I think there's a mental perception -- MR. HOLE: That's right. MR. DAVIS: -- that you cross some line from a certain community to some other kind of community. MR. HOLE: Maybe we could claim it is not on the east coast. Take some pictures and say it's somewhere 'else. MR. DAVIS: You can't point to Lee County. MR. HOLE: Of course not. How about Carmel? No. MR DAVIS: Mot Carmel. MR HOLE: But i% is perception. MR KOREST: That's your project, Stanley. You're appointed. MR HOLE: Oh, gee. MR DAVIS: Anything else, Ken? MR HEATHERINGTON: No, sir. Thank you. I appreciate your cooperation and assistance. If there is anything that I can do or my staff from the MPO, do not hesitate to call us. MR. DAVIS: I just have one question, Mike. MR. BRUET: Yes. MR. DAVIS: To address what Stanley talked about with flyovers. When you talk about an intersection of Golden Gate Parkway and Airport or even worse than that is Pine Ridge and Airport, is there enough land left there to be able to build those? MR. HOLE: Archibald told me they had enough land not only to have it there, but to construct it. It had been set aside. So they just can't get the powers to be to agree to look at ].t carefully enough to prove that. MR. DAVIS: When I look at that corner, especially Airport Road, it just looks like everything is right there. There is nowhere to go. MR. BRUET: At one time the Halsted PUD had designed for a flyover at that intersection. MR. HOLE: Still does. That's right. MR. BRUET: It's still in place? I can recall seeing that. MR. HEATHERINGTON: Well, we'll try and elevate that conceptual idea and provide some education to the elected officials in the near future. MR. HOLE: That will be exciting. MR. DAVIS: Thanks, Ken. MR. HEATHERINGTON: Thank you. MR. RIDEOUTTE: This brings up one thing. Before we get away, I will say it now while I'm thinking about it. One of the most important aspects of our job that we -- other than doing the comp plan, which took a great deal of time -- and Tom Selck brings this up frequently. We are the planning board, but what we do -- other than the comp plan, we do very damn little planning. We are reactive. People come Page 18 J i ii ~1111 III IIIIIII Il Ill Il I .............. II~l'l !1 166 January 29, 1998 in with this problem or that problem or another problem. We try to react to the thing and give advice. We would like -- I don't know what you guys are doing, but if you're doing something that you can share with us to where we can become more proactive. This is sort of that thing to look down the road and see what is coming up and say, "Look," rather than wait until you ge% the problem there. Because we have had a number of things come up that frankly the people -- somebody comes in with something and most of the City says, "God, that is reprehensible," but if you apply the criteria that are there, hell, they can do it. ~ow, rather than -- and then you try to backfill and all this sort of stuff. Rather than doing that if we could look at what might be coming down the road and how can we advise council and all to prevent these things ~ ~ ~om happening and really start to do som~ planning. We haven't been doing that. So anything that you guys are doing like that, any tips or something you can share with us, we would certainly appreciate it. MR. DAVIS: I think probably sometimes we have that same frustration because -- I agree with you that that really is the bigger charge if we're the local planning agency by the State statute and all those things. But so often you get caught up and there is a full agenda of land use petitions. MR. RIDEOUTTE: I know. MR. DAVIS: And I think you almost have to plan a workshop and have a public workshop and maybe address some more -- some broader planning issues that way. Because to try to get it done in the course of doing the normal business there never seems to be enough time MR. RIDEOUTTE: Yeah. ' MR. DAVIS: One thing where I think we have had some effect is when we review the growth management plan. Well, particularly twice a year with the land development code. There is a lot of suggestions our board has made or in the course of maybe reviewing a petition we'll say to Bob, "This doesn't make sense that the code is set up this way." And more often than not, very soon -- the next cycle -- we see some attempt to rectify that problem. MR. RIDEOUTTE: To fi:< it. MR. DAVIS: And so that part has been working well the ias~ couple of years. MR. ABERNATHY: Mike, did I understand that Ms. Preston is long-range planning? MR. DAVIS: Yes. MR. ABERNATHY: i don't think we have that function in the City at all. Ours is right here. MR. DAVIS: This may be a good lead-in to Ms. Preston. MR. MULHERE: I would just add that I think it's very true. uhe nature of -- it is the nature of the way things are set up that the p~anning commission appears to be more reactive in its involvement because anything that we bring, for example, to the planning commission -- I am sure it is the same as the board. We've already developed -- even if it is long-range planning, Page 19 January 29, 1998 we've already developed some scenario, some recommendation and we've brought them to the planning commission for some reaction -- you know, pro or con -- and some recommendation to the board. The proactive process almost has to be public oriented. And I think a workshop where the public is invited is probably the only place where you can look at five or six things or three or four things that have come up over time that seem to be problematic. You've got to bring that public -- that public process in because we can't really presume to necessarily know individually or even maybe as-a small group what the public perception is over certain things. So from a planning perspective it's that public involvement that we want to have so that we can have some direction as to which way to go. And a lot of times that takes place -- and why I'm saying it appears reactive is because a lot of times that takes place before it ever gets to the planning commission. In most cases obviously it takes place before and it's a more formalized process when it gets to the planning commission. So it seems like you're reacting more than planning. MR. ABERNATHY: But we are the planning commission. HR. MULHERE: I agree. MR. HOLE: We're supposed to represent that. MS. STUDENT: Let me just offer something from a legal perspective. Our laws and ordinances are supposed to protect the public health, safety and welfare. So it's hard to know where there is a public health or safety or a general welfare issue until a problem arises. And it's difficult to write a law to address something in the abstract and maybe have it legally sustainable without knowing that it's a real problem. So I almost say there is a -- it's just endemic in the process that it happens that way. In the County we try to be as much ahead of the curve, you know, as we can. One of the things that comes to mind that Bob might want to comment on is our architectural standards that we recently enacted. MR. HOLE: I wanted to hear about those. MS. STUDENT: There was a real-world problem there that we needed to address. There were two of them actually and then we did it. MR. ~ULHERE: I think that's a good example. Again, we in the planning department for a pretty long time -- you know, we wanted or we felt as though we needed to have some better architectural design standards. But there really wasn't a whole lot of public support out there. There really wasn't a whole lot of political support out there. Every time the idea surfaced it was, "We don't need more regulations." ~R. ABERNATHY: Until the two big boxes came along. MR. HULHERE: And then something happened that galvanized -- I say all the planning gods were shining down on us and all the planets were in order in the form of -- using Commissioner Hancock's words, "Toys-R-Us and Sports Authority." It just happened that everything -- the timing was right and then the public process started. And, boy, there was widespread -- you Page 20 January 29, 1998 remember seeing the letters to the editor and the articles in the paper. There was widespread public support to do something and do it immediately. Again, that really was a reactionary process and not a proactive process. ~R. HOLE: And I think sometimes -- I have been a staff man for years and years. The staffs decided what -- how their bosses are going to react because they get signals from ether or they just feel this and so they don't bring things up. I think it's important that the staffs, if they have something they think ought to be considered, =ly it through us. ! wish the City planning staff was here. Give us a chance to say, "No, no, no. Bring that up next year," or, "That's a good idea." One of the things we've talked about at a public meeting was the idea of having kind ~f an advisory group made up of a couple of members of %ke City and a couple members of the County to review applications that would be submitted within 100 yards or a quarter of a mile of the city/county boundaries. !;or -- it wouldn't take any action, except they would make a recom~]endation to, for example, the City PAB if it's in the City or the County if it's in the County and try to have some uniformity within that strip. I don't care how wide the strip is. You want to start out pretty narrow so you don't have too much. But that is something that the staffs don't bring up. I think if it were brought up, we would probably be interested in hearing about it. MR. ~3LHERE: I think it's a great idea. ~4R. HOLE: And I think the architectural -- and ]. know I've heard it at the public hearing discussion by the PAB about the real importance of architectural standards in commercial areas and do we wan~ the downtown homestead where everything all of a sudden narrows down and here are the buildings right here or do we want the boulevard sections in the County up in North Naples. Well, what do we like? We never get those questions. And so, you know, I've sat on both sides of agencies and I understand staff's problem in trying to second-guess what we want to hear and not take up our time. i don't know if the County has that problem. But I think ' have ~hat problem in the City. I,~R. MULHERE: I think that is very true. And part of ~hat we'll be -- I think that's a great idea. I don't think there is a whole lot of communication from the two entities. MR. HOLE: And the two staffs. ~R. ~4ULHERE: From the staff level, right. ~4R. HOLE: Right. MR. ~4ULHERE: But I think, you know, one of the things we're going ~o be looking at in the next year or two at various levels and geographic areas is corridor management. One of them that is on the agenda next and Debra is here to talk about is the gateway -- what we're calling the gateway triangle, which really is in a sense gateway to the City. And what we do there certainly impacts, you Page 21 know, the experience of traveling into the City. ~ut there are others. I mean, Immokalee we are looking at State ?oad 29 corridor. We have looked at an overlay which we developed for Marco island prior to incorporation. I still -- I think though maybe it is a function or maybe it is a result of having so many priorities. it is still -- I mean, I think the comment is absolutely true. It seems, even from our perspective, a lot of things are more reactionary than proactionary. It's just -- MR. HOLE: Just a closing comment. Don't read the tea leaves wrong. Most staffs are intimidated and they just -- they don't want to bring these things up. Bring them up. Let your council say, "No. We'll worry about that next year." But bring them up. You're the guys that know. MR. RIDEOUTTE: We can beat this around all day. The ma~n thing is that if -- all I am savin~ to you is -- I recognize ~oo zar out front. But sometimes you see a few little indica,:ions that, hey, that's a problem down the road. Anything you guys -- we do not do enough of that in my view. I think it's certainly shared by the majority of our board. But all I'm saying is if you guys have any ideas or something that you're doing in that respect, we would appreciate you sharing that. That is the bottom line. That's all I'm asking. MR. DAVIS: Yeah. And, I guess, just by the nature -- I think as Marjorie pointed out, by the nature of it sometimes it is reactionary because there can be the criteria for the approval o~ a project and when it actually goes through the process what you see you go, "Gee, whiz. This isn't what we expected." And that's when -- you know, we are obligated to speak up and say to staff, "We better look at this because this is broken and it needs to be fixed." !'4R. YORK: But i think we do that. MR. DAVIS: Yeah, we do. Yeah, we do. :4R. YORK: You know, my observation is that the growth management plan ts mandated by the State of Florida. We need to update that periodically, which we do. You know, we amended our land development code to conform with that. And we have staff that -- that is involved in not only short range, but long-range planning. That, you know, kind of guides us along that area. And I view -- I really view our function as a compliance review board just to make sure that applications and -- you know, for buildings or whatever it might be or for zoning and for rezones fit within what we have planned. I mean, I don't see us as being functional planners. I mean, I view our position really as being a compliance review board to make sure -- and we find -- we find holes that we recommend to staff that need to look at to be plugged. MR. DAVIS: What Jim is talking about is if you go back and read the State statutes that set up planning commissions and local planning agencies our charge is really much broader than that. MR. ABERNATHY: The planning agency for the government entity. MR. RIDEOUTTE: I will just take it from a philosophical Page 22 standpoint. I don't care whether you're in business or government or · ..Jhere '~'ou are. It is great to have people who are good problem solvers, but I will take a problem preventer any day. So just from a philosophical standpoint, that's what I'm saying. Some of these things we can get out front. Not to minimize what you say, Don, you're absolutely right. I'm saying we, in my view, are spending an inordinate amount of time on that side of the thing when if we spent a little more time on the front, we might greatly reduce and have a better community by doing some of the other. ~R. DAVIS: And part of it, too, Jim, is -- I have quite a bit of personal involvement with the Marco Island overlay, the special overlay for the Marco Island community. Sometimes it takes that extra effort of getting out when there isn't an issue -- that's a citizens issue -- of going on like that and talking to some groups as ~'e did down on Marco Island. And a couple cf times -- just look and focus as planning commissioners and feel an obligation to involve yourself in some of those things. I know when that Marco Island overlay came to the planning commission ! was very knowledgeable about it, having spent some time with it and helping some various groups on it. And we've -- I know we have talked more than once, Bob, about the -- our concern that the Immokalee community in our view being something different obviously than the coastal commune, ry. An overlay in that area certainly seems in order. And I think Bob mentioned that -- mentioned it here sometime today. MR. MULHERE: I think Mr. Hole had a real good point. I was thinking back. There is probably -- you have to try as a s~aff -- as a professional staff member sometimes to get over your bad experiences. Because I can think of an example of -- you can maybe relate to it in the City. I know it is an issue in the City. I read the paper. Special events. ~4R. HOLE: Doonesbury. ~.[R. MULHERE: We don't have the right kind of control over these large special events. And the staff really shouldn't b,3 put in a position to make decisions they're going to have to get -- maybe get in the ringer over because the rules are very -- they are not very specific. And I am talking about large special events, impacts on the neighborhood, traffic, noise, things like that. And so I put together an amendment that I thought would address -- that would require someone to address specific items and ~o to the board for approval for large-scale special events. This may be required in the City. I don't know. I got, you know, shot down pretty good. t~R. HOLE: Keep trying. Remember, a bunch of people said, "Redo Cocohatchee River." We said, "Go away." They came in with a blueprint of Cocohatchee River and said, "Now will 'you do it?" It's been a savior. Keep working. If you see something needs done, keep working on it. I think the result of that sometimes you say, "I'll go away," and Page 23 January 29, jL 6G 2 it will float up from the public as a problem. MR. DAVIS: It's a tough situation. MR. HOLE: It is. MR. DAVIS: You're right, Stanley. It is if that's your expertise and you see that needs to -- maybe as Jim pointed out, so that it doesn't get to that point, yeah, holler. MR. HOLE: Expect to be shot down. But you will have accomplished something and it was nothing personal. MR. SELCK: We have an election coming up next week which centers on planning and zoning issues. And the voters are going to be asked to determine whether or not we're going to have to replace the statutory planning process with one that's a beauty contest. And if -- depending on how this goes, this could very well spill over into the County. ! think it's -- if you read and look at who the people t~t are saying that, they're the sort of no growth people. They're saying that they want to keep things the same. Rational people say, "Well, you can't keep it the same, but you can -- you can manage it to accommodate growth, but keep the same values that you want to keep if you have a properly contrived zoning situation." We've got in Naples a prescriptive zoning ordinance which says this, this, this and this. If it's excluded from there because it's not a new business, or whatever, you can't put it in. In other communities around the country there is performance zoning where you say, "This is what we want. This is the image we want." The planning boards in those communities look at it and they say, "This fits within this model of what we want." And so, I mean, it is more visionary than it is a doctor's prescription for a community like our typical zoning ordinance. I would hope that over the years we would in the County and the City take a view of zoning that allows us to get more to the performance type zoning where we have a consensus within the community as to what the end results should be down the road than we do with the present zoning that we have. MR. DAVIS: That is true. At the APA conference that was here in town -- help me, Debra, with the right term for it. I keep thinking community improvement districts, but that's not what -- I don't think that's what it was. MR. ~ULHERE: Community development district. MS. PRESTON: Redevelopment. MR. DAVIS: It wasn't redevelopment. I guess, it was community redevelopment districts, a whole series of meetings where it's community generated what they want to see. MR. MULHERE: Neighborhood planning. MR. DAVIS: Neighborhood planning, yeah. That was very informative. And ! think that's what we saw -- theoretically we saw on Marco Island where they wanted something different. That was their vision and they brought that vision forward and it was codified into an overlay district for Marco Island. MR. SELCK: Peter VanArsdale wanted a comprehensive plan. A few Page 24 16G January 29, 1998 others want a comprehensive plan for Naples that was like a National Geographic magazine; small that you can give to every family in town. They would look at it and go page by page and they would know what kind of community was there and the vision for the community. it doesn't meet the State regulations to do it that way. But, nevertheless, you give somebody a comprehensive plan, it's a $200 fee to give it to them, and it doesn't mean squat once they get it because they can't understand any of it, not from page one. And that's not -- that's not serving the public. MR. DAVIS: Well, true. Ours can be difficult to understand, too. MR. SELCK: They all are. And it's that way because of the State. ~,;ow, maybe -- maybe the trick is to do something that satisfies the State and say, "Here is our harbor plan," which ~ve don't have one like Miami does. "~{ere is our jetport plan." We don't have one. And then we have another comprehensive plan that everybody -- that we use and everybody relates to. MR. HOLE: And call it a guide to the comp plan. MR. DAVIS: That's true. MR. SELCK: Whatever. But so that people understand it. If the people understood what the goals in our comp plan were, we wouldn't be having this full house I don't believe. Because our goals -- our goals are no different than the goal that we want to keep Naples special. MR. DAVIS: Sure. You hit upon something that, ycu know, we find all the time. I often feel sorry for citizens who come to speak on a petition because they don't have a clue sometimes that we even have a comp plan or what it says or that we have a land development code or what it says. There is probably more -- more volumes of protections and vision of what we want our County to be than they even know about. So sometimes, yeah, it is hard to communicate unless you do communicate it, as you pointed out, in a National Geographic format where the average person can take it and look through it and understand. MR. SELCK: Everybody can read an image and draw an inference from a picture or whatever. When it comes to judging whether or not a commercial building fits within it, you show pictures of the kinds of buildings that you want. And when the Sports Authority comes along you say, "We don't find a picture ~n here that meets wha~ you want to do. I guess ~.;e can't do it." MR. HOLE: How did you all develop your commercial architectural standards? MR. DAVIS: Well, it was -- Bob was very actively involved in that. And I will let Bob talk about that. But there are -- MR. HOLE: I don't want to talk about it, unless there is a -- MR. KOREST: I am interested, too. MR. MULHERE: I think they are approaching what Mr. Selck is referring to, but they're probably not all the way there. I don't know that we -- in my experience and probably our collective experience in the planning department can't quite get by yet not Page January 29, 1998 having some black and white. And I know we can't get by Marjorie. ~ut, you know, our ex"perience is we have to deal with -- and so do you -- worst case scenarios. Those are the ones that you have to provide something to prohibit. But the architectural standards really are approaching, I guess, performance zoning in that they do provide an image and they do provide both written and image -- I mean, both a picture and sort of a written description of what it is we want to achieve in commercial zoning development. And they require that the persons building the commercial building or designing it take into account the surrounding buildings in the neighborhood. And then the next thing it does is it provides for in a lot of cases a laundry list of applications. Rather than saying, "Thou shalt have a bell tower on this shopping center," it says, "We want to see some architectural embellishments on a building. Here is an example of ten typ. es of architectural embellishments. Choose two." MR. HOLE: Did you do this or did you bring in a group of local architects to consult with you on it? How did you -- MR. MULHERE: Both. We were very lucky. We were very fortunate to have a young professional architect, Joe McHarris, who really was very -- he says he came to the County to accomplish this. He's since !eft. We think that we hired him and told him what to do. But, anyway, he was very helpful. And then we did bring in the architectural community, as well as the development community, as well as the public at large. We had several large hometown meetings; one at the Ritz and one down at the Marriott on Marco. MR. HOLE: Did the local AIA chapter help you? MR. MULHERE: Yes, uh-huh. And a couple of professionals. We also brought in ~cDonald's corporation, Burger King corporation. We invited the big box and little box retailers to participate. We only got a couple that did. The ones that did were very helpful in the process becaus~ we said, "How can we make this so that it's not completely onerous to you? But you have to understand that this community has an image and wants to maintain that image. We don't want our image to be destroyed so that we can have your corporate image become the primary focus here." There was a lot of compromise that went on. It Was a good public planning process. MR. HOLE: How long did it take you to do it? MR. ~.~LHERE: Well, it was pretty quick. And we're going to go back and re-review them now because they've been in operation for about a year. We've reviewed about 100 commercial projects. We want to go out and take pictures of the ones that have gone through the process with relatively few problems. It took us about, I would say, eight months. ~4R. DAVIS: Yeah. ~4R. ~413LHERE: I think -- and we were under the gun because we were basically told, "These will come back very quickly." MR. HOLE: Sure. Page 2 6 January 29, 1998 ~..IR. ~&ULHERE: So I think the process really should have taken a 'itt!e bit longer, but maybe that is just the planner in me. ~.!P.. HOLE: Did your planning group here direct you as staff to come up with a draft commercial architectural standards document; is %hat how it got started or did the County Commission do it? · .',IR. MULHERE: The County Commission actually directed us, but there were a lot of occasions -- there was a lot of support and a lot of discussion at the planning commission level. As the public members of the --- members of the planning commission would run into somebody at the grocery store and they'd say, "How could you allow that disgusting thing to happen?" So there was a lot of support at that time. Public, planning commission and board. As I said, when these two buildings :vent up over here that was the end of it. Then it was, "Get it done.' .... .'e got tc say -- frankly, i".'e got to say that Commissioner Hancock -- ~4R. HOLE: So you had a hero. }4R. MULHERE: Yeah. ! think we did. I think we really had an individual who had experience and had a vision and who :vas going to push the issue. And the other commissioners sort of said, "Go with And that had never happened relative to that issue before. Again, this is a highly republican area. It's like no more regulation, but here we were putting more regulation. So it was an inueresting experience. MR. WRAGE: I think our whole process was generate,'] by a phone call. Leave it to Tim Hancock and he'll tell you that. All of a sudden -- everybody drives through that intersection and went:, "What are you guys doing? Are you sleeping at these meetings?" ~IR. HOLE: It's like downtown Eckerd in dow~ntown Naples. MR. KOREST: It meets all the codes. MR. ABERNATHY: Well, everybody up in my end of town is cringing over what this new Eckerd is going to look like. We hope that it doesn't back onto the street. :4R. 'fORK: The one up on Pine Ridge? }4R. ABERNATHY: Just south of Pine Ridge. MR. DAVIS: That would have fallen under the new architectural standards. MR. MULHERE: I am sure it was. We reviewed those. We can take a look at the -- ~R. ABERNATHY: Vision Works -- >~R. HOLE: That's okay. }4R. ABERNATHY: -- at 22nd, that is -- ~4R. KOREST: Those are the two bad ones in the City. },~R. HOLE: I think we have enough examples to get people excited about not having that happen again. ~.!R. SELCK: But we'-,-e got to have rules r.o coax t~.e ieve~.c~er into doing something a little better than they had in mind, rather [han go in and pull the permit. MR. DAVIS: I think that was really -- my observation ~s tha.~ :.:as the end result. What our board played a role in was it -- it came to Page 2'7 January us for a lot of comments from the advisory committee. And there were a lot of changes made to it before it ultimately went to the board. A lot of public interchange at our meeting, which helped a lot. And it really helped to refine it to getting closer to what it needed to be. And I now have seen in the year it's been in place -- the first one that springs to mind is there was an auto parts store built on the East Trail just past the Glades entrance. MR. MULHERE: Discount Auto Parts. MR. DAVIS: Discount Auto Parts. Minimal building. Really pretty ugly. They got caught in the architectural review standards with the one they put on 951. It's like night and day. The two buildings are like night and day. So at least to that extent it is working. I am sure it will take HR. PEDONE: Or the new -- what is that -- Lowe's there on Airport right next to Pine Ridge. MR. MULHERE: There is a serious battle that takes place here on every single one of them. MR. HOLE~ Sure. MR. MULHERE: And, unfortunately, we lost Joe. I would recommend though you really -- we really feel the need to have an architect. MR. HOLE: Where did Joe go? MR. HI3LHERE: Bonita -- MS. STUDENT: Bonita Bay Properties. MR. MULHERE: But the point is we need to get somebody else in here. We don't have anybody else in here right now. It's been a little bit problematic because -- let me just say this very quickly. The thing that changed was before the planners used to see a two-dimensional site plan that showed a box and parking and water management and landscaping. You didn't really see landscaping, but · ,ou saw a ten-foot strip that was landscaping. So you said, "Does it meet A, B, C, D and E?" It does and it is approved. Then you saw the building going up and ?'ou said, "I didn't know it was going to look like that." :~c'x what's happened because we require -- we require a rendering and four sets of architectural plans, paint chips. You know, we require this stuff up front as part of the submittal. The developer, the builder, the property owner is now required to bring the architect in -- no offense -- but along with the engineer, instead of after the engineer has decided the plans that you will fit whatever it is into this box. What we ended up having is an image right away of what the building is going to look like. And without having to do too much because of that change in the process, the property owner now has an image of what the building is going to look like up front and he's able to make some decisions, which, by the way, in most cases a~e better than he would have been able to make after the fact bringing the architect into the process. It costs the same amount of money. It's just now you have to pay for it up front, instead of -- so there's less speculation and there's Page 28 $6G 2 January 29, 1998 more serious imagery involved. So I think the process is just a lot better in that respect. >Je";e changed -- we've made it a three-dimensional review process -;ersus a two-dimensional review process. No offense. I mean, you do what you've got to do. But having the architect up front in the process, you know, really has -- without the staff having changed it has changed the process before the product walks in the door here is what I would say. MR. HOLE: A corporate architect knows that he's got an uphill battle if he wants to come in with a corporate style and they understand what they have to do. MR. MULHERE: They've got five plans usually. They start with plan A. If you say, "Okay," that's what you get. He can -- ~R. SELCK: They want to do the minimum basically. If we raise the bar, then -- ~R. HOLE: Then they do it. MR. MULHERE: Exactly. ~4R. SELCK: It's to our benefit to keep that bar as high as we can, otherwise we'll look just like Fort Myers. MR. MULHERE: Discount Auto Parts is a good example. They said, "We can't do that. We're not going to do it." And we felt pretty confident. We said, "Fine. So long." MR. ABERNATHY: Well, we went round and round, Tom, with that Mobil Station on Central in the absence of architectural standards and just doing a lot of jockeying and horse trading. A~nd finally they said -- MR. SELCK: It went away. MR. ABERNATHY: We washed our hands of it and sent it to City Council and they said, "This is too big." That was the end of it. MR. MULHERE: The problem where you have the most difficulty I'll say is redevelopment. You know, where somebody buys -- ~4R. HOLE: That's the City. MR. MULHERE: It's tough. It's very tough there. We put in a regula:~ion that says -- I want to give Debra a chance to talk about the gateway. But we put in a stipulation that says if you add more than 20 percent of the floor area to a building or if the improvements that you're making exceed 50 percent -- we just apply the rule 50 percent -- to the value of the structure, then you need to address the architectural standards. But that is really -- that's where it really gets tough. Because that's where -- if someone is building a new building, they're more than willing to do it. We did a cost study, too. And the cost really wasn't that much. It was between ~hree and five percent additional cost to meet the architectural standards than not. But during a redevelopment, you know, and in certain areas of the County people are really resistant to it. They say, "Look. I'm spending some money. I'm making improvements. I don't want to redo the facade of the building." And you really have to hold true. You have to have a lot of Page 29 January 29, I~.S(~;~l' 2 support. Once that support starts to waver, there is a lot of room %here. And then if you feel like there is no political support for what ,~'ou're doing, then there is going to be some problems. So, you know, that is where you have to write some things almost black and white. You need to be able to say, "You've got to do it this way." MR. SELCK: Well, you have to have it in black and white. MR. PEDONE: And you don't have that much control over what goes on Fifth Avenue South right now, as far as architectural? HR. HOLE: There's the overlay district. MR. KOREST: There's an overlay district there. HR. HOLE: That's about the only one we have control. HR. PEDONE: I just heard that Antaramian will be putting up two more buildings on Fifth Avenue South. HR. DAVIS: I will make an observation -- and I am sDeaki~;g as a sign contractor. City of Haples has control to a degree that makes absolutely no sense to me. The SAC review committee to -- and this -- to go down for every four foot by four foot construction sign that is going to be up during the course of construction individually continues to make no sense to me. MR. HOLE: I thought that was three foot by three foot. HR. DAVIS: Whatever it is. Whatever it is. MR. PEDONE: I'm glad Mike is only off by one. MR. DAVIS: I guess the point is the architectural standards seem to work well because there is some flexibility and it's pretty much still a standard review process as opposed to --- I heard our Board of County Commissioners eight, nine years ago talk about we need some architectural control. But you can put controls that, you know, become so stifling they tend not to work. Hy read on what we've got is they seem to'be working pretty good because there is some flexibility there and you haven't taken all the design abilities away from the architect and engineers. So it seems to work pretty well. We need to give Debra some time. We're fast approaching our eleven o'clock hour. Before you talk about the triangle -- beinq that you're from the long-range planning and you've heard our discussion, any observations from you, Debra? MS. PRESTON: I think it's been a very interesting discussion. And I feel that this group seems to be very supportive of the efforts ~hat we have been doing on the County side. As far as getting the smaller master plans done, we have done Marco Island. We have done !mmokalee. Now we're working on the triangle and then the Bayshore area. And I think -- you know, I think from Bob's point of view, too, as a staff person there are things that we would like to take forward. ! thought this gentleman's comments were very interesting about bringing things forward that we would like to get your opinion on. And one would be the gateway triangle and the idea of creating a redevelopment agency or district for that specific triangle, which the Page 3 0 January 29, 1998 County has not touched upon yet, and what the ramifications will be from the County end of it. But I think the triangle lends itself very well to this area. HR. DAVIS: I think probably sometimes the staff members -- you need to remind us by bringing things to us of our larger charge than just reviewing the regular stuff like we do. MR. HOLE: Do you all meet with the City staff? MS. PRESTON: The City staff has been involved with the triangle project. MR. HOLE: I mean in general like every three months you get together. MS. PRESTON: Not that I am aware. MR. MULHERE: Not really, no. HR HS MR .MR HOLE: Okay. RIDEOUTTE: Do the two sides speak? PRESTON: We do speak. MULHERE: We speak, yeah. RIDEOUTTE: That's a good beginning. Let's ~u- it fha~ ',.;ay MR DAVIS: When I called Bob up to tell him about this meeting -- and Bob and I talked at length about the whole idea of it. And I remember Bob making one comment, which I think made a lot of sense, is to -- at least the two development staffs to have some way to develop a mechanism to notify each other of petitions -- pendirg petitions that were in these areas we have been talking about. MR RIDEOUTTE: Right. MR DAVIS: At least start that much to where -- MR ABERNATHY: The interface area? MR DAVIS: Yeah. MR HOLE: Common boundaries. MR DAVIS: Right. Exactly. Because that way they would know here if something is going to happen down there that would have some impact. So that is something that's not real tough to put in place that might at least start the process down that road, which makes a lot of sense. MR. MULHERE: I have this map up here. I have one for everybody. If you want to take a look at it, I have one here for everybody. That map shows the boundaries between the County and the City. It shows the triangle, too. It does not have the City zoning on it. I didn't have that overlay to put on there. It has the County zoning on it. We probably could get one. It does show the streets and the landmarks in the City so you can identify where you're at. i think we were at some point probably sending a copy of an application or an agenda for the planning commission that involved the project. I don't know if that is taking place right now. ! think it would be good both ways for that to happen. At least you have then the opportunity to comment. And maybe even more than just sending an agenda, actually saying, "There is a project that is here," so it would bring to the attention of someone to look at that issue. MR. DAVIS: I think there is a majority of planning commissicn Page 31 January 29, i998 and board members sitting around here that we would love for you to make that happen. That seems like a good path for us to start down. And with that we'll -- we won't talk anymore, Debra. MS. PRESTON: I know you want to stop at eleven. MR. SELCK: Did you all get a copy of our 4110 plan? MS. PRESTON: Uh-huh. MR. DAVIS: i think the staff might have. We personally did not. HR. SELCK: You guys never did? MR. DAVIS: No. HR. HOLE: Our draft 4110 plan. MR. SELCK: I th~nk they ought to get things like that, Jim, because it is right on -- it's right on the edge. It sets the image for entering Naples. HR. HOLE: It's on the edge. MR. SELCK: From the east. They ought to see that. MS. PRESTON: !4y name is Debra Preston. I'm a principal planner with the comprehensive planning section. And the gateway triangle started actually like in May of '94. There was some discussion from the Naples Civic Association that they were concerned with the condition of the triangle and that the property values had either decreased or at least been stagnant for a number of years. And the commission at that time and staff had looked at creating a community redevelopment agency. And that had been discussed and reviewed for, I think, two years or so and nothing ever was really done about that. And then Commissioner Mac'Kie had rec~ested a meeting of the commercial property owners back in '97. Just last year. And they came together and they started identifying some issues. And staff got involved with those early meetings to try and get both the residential side and the commercial side involved. This, of course, is Davis Boulevard, 41 and the triangle. And the study area was basically the interior of the triangle. Although, we did look at just the immediate properties that were on the other side of each of the major corridors. HR. HOLE: Good. MS. PRESTON: And we thought you couldn't -- MR. ABERNATHY: You can't do one side without the other. MR. HOLE: That's right. MSo PRESTON: And then we developed a series of meetings and we broke down into small committee groups trying to get as many people that actually own property or resided in the triangle involved in the planning process. In October we hired an outside consultant, Urban Design Studios West, to come in and do a workshop, a charett, like you are all familiar with on the City side and that we've done several ~imes within the County, as well. And this is their future land use map that they sort of created. And just to give you reference, the City water plant is located within the triangle and so is Shadowlawn Elementary School. And the school board actually owns some additional property. That's the warehouse within the triangle. We have lighter industrial uses. A lot of this Page 32 January 29, 1998 is zoned C-5. Interestingly enough, this residential area -- the majorisy cf it -- is zoned for multifamily six units per acre, but it's really been developed as single units. So there hasn't been any desire for anyone to go in there and do some, you know, more intense residential development. One of the major problems in the triangle is drainage. A lot of those streets are under water when we have a major storm. The County has done a preliminary study to see how we could rectify some of the drainage issue looking at just sort of a short-term approach. Just doing increased maintenance, then doing some capital improvements. And then the final scenario if we did totally redevelop this area what that would cost and what we would need to do. This map here -- i will bring this over a bit. This is '..:!~at the consultants had come up with after a series of community meetings. And this '.vas basically to turn this into a retail commercial area, maintain the residential area. At one time we had thought there was an interest in bulldozing the whole thing and turning this into a convention center, hotel complex and then just increasing some of the commercial zoning. The depth on this property on both of the corridors. This along U.S. 41 you have commercial in these very narrow lots up front and then residential directly behind it. So just from a planning point of view it makes sense to try and deepen that commercial zoning there so we can encourage some redevelopment. MR. HOLE: You step from commercial to multi to s;~ngle? MS. PRESTON: Do we in this area here? MR. HOLE: Yeah. MS. PRESTON: This is, right. Are we proposing that? In some ways. Although, this right here is to be maintained as single-family. ~4R. HOLE: I meant on the outside. ~<S. PRESTON: This out here? Yeah. It would be commercial, multifamily here -- ~4R HOLE: And then single? [.[S PRESTON: I think mostly single. ~R YORK: Debra, that's that shopping center -- ~,~S PRESTON: Right here? >~R YORK: That's Gulf Gate? >IS PRESTON: Gulf Gate, right. >IR YORK: And then the other one up further towards -- >!R ~4ULHERE: Chlumsky is the one -- ~.[R YORK: That's the one I'm thinking of. It's lovely. ~[S PRESTON: He has been very involved in the planning process. ~,~R HOLE: That's what you ought to bulldoze. ~,~S PRESTON: Pardon? They have also looked at maintaining this as an office park ts~e environment with linkage to the government center. There°s been some discussion whether or not there was a need for professional offices, such as lawyers, title searchers. And there was some people -- I guess there was a professional office building that had a lot of Page 33 lawyers in it that's since moved out. There has been a debate, but most of the people felt that that was still an appropriate use. !.IR HOLE: Where is The Pub? 14S PRESTON: The Pub is on Linwood. blR ABERNATHY: Don't mess with that, Debra. r. IR HOLE: You're going to leave that? r~S PRESTON: Yes. ~IR HOLE: Okay. MS PRESTON: Actually, what they had proposed is -- Pine Street does not go all the way through. What they're proposing is Pine Street would go all the way through, which might help alleviate some of the commercial traffic from continuing through Linwood and going out to Airport Road. So that was one thing. They also looked at creating some water retenticn areas to help with the drainage. We would have to go in and buy up some of the property there to assemble that. That was the first sort of conceptual plan. And then this one is sort of in a grander scale or looks just at your uses with the corridor here and what some strategies would be. A lot of getting this to this point wOuld take issues, such as zoning. We would have to go in and do rezoning. We'd have to do some land assembly or at least provide some incentives for a developer or a landowner to go in and buy some additional property and package it together. This here is -- MR. ABERNATHY: That's a 4110 corridor? MR. HOLE: Uh-huh. MS. PRESTON: Yeah. Perhaps so. I think Davis Boulevard -- because they're going to be starting the landscaping improvements along Davis in the near future, if they haven't already begun, this probably is the first step we can look at is doing this section, which would require probably a zoning overlay, looking at some architectural standards, maybe becoming a little bit more specific for this corridor and then looking at some land assembly, if necessary. But most of this could be done, I think, basically ~;ith some rezoning. What the community has done is they have reviewed this plan so far and they have divided up into some subcommittees. The number one was drainage. They're going to continue to work with the County staff on the drainage problem there. The second one was commercial zoning issues. We're going to be meeting next week I believe it is. And most of the people when they saw this plan really felt that commercial zoning should go a little bit further, that maintaining this residential character wasn't really Going to happen or that is not really what they thought should happen. They're going to look again at maybe expanding this commercial zoning a little bit more. if you look at Shadowlawn as sor~ of tile divider, which is right there, or you -- there is not much we can do about the City water plant. It's going to stay. And we also have the school, which would Page 34 166 2 January 29, 1998 be hard to move or close I think at this point. So the most you could do is go up to Shadowlawn here with some additional commercial zoning. ~,~R. ABERNATHY: Debra the residential that you kave in there, is -~ -- would you call it below median price? ~.IS. PRESTON: Yeah. In this County it is. ~R. YORK: Way below. MR. ABERNATHY: Way below? t4R. YORK: Way below. MS. PRESTON: You could probably go in and buy a house for 60 or $70,000 in there. MR. ABERNATHY: Okay. MS. PRESTON: There are some very nice streets. Caladon3a is pretty well kept up. Francis isn't a very good street. MR. YORK: No. i~S. ?RESTON: Connecticu~ has been changing over ~he ~'ears. think it's improving a little bit. So there are these streets here which are residential that seem to be in better condition than the ones on this side of Shadowlawn. MR. MULHERE: Are they on the water? I'm sorry. MS. PRESTON: No. MR. MULHERE: ~;one of those are on the water. MR. HOLE: Do we have a sense of neighborhood there? MS. PRESTON: No. We don't have any neighborhood associations and there's a lot of renters. MR. PEDONE: But when the Assembly of God tried to put a homeless shelter those people were up in arms against the homeless shelter. Because I was on the code enforcement board. MR. HOLE: So we have the potential for a creation of a neighborhood. MR. PEDONE: You have a very large potential if they feel threatened. ~4R. YORK: Well, Mike, you bring up an excellent point. When we get churches in a residential area -- and that's one of my bugaboos. The church gets in there and then all of a sudden ~hey cry to expand their facility to put in day-care, social services and schools. And that is not the proper place for that to happen. And I, for one, have always tried to fight whenever the churches -- they are in there for a good reason. But when they try to expand'into commercial use, it kind of kills the neighborhood. MS. PRESTON: Assembly of God has quite a bit of property. ~IR. YORK: Yeah. There is school buses parked all over. It's certainly not conducive to the appearance of a neighborhood. ~S. PRESTON: The third subcommittee we formed was a residential subcommittee with the idea that they could go in and try and create more of a sense of neighborhood there and maybe set up a neighborhood association. And then the fourth committee which had started actually this summer was a code enforcement committee like they have done in Golden Gate. They have a special committee that works directly with the code enforcement officer in identifying complaints and giving tha~ to the Page 35 January 2 9 ,'1!~ 2 code enforcement officer to speed up the process. So that's been around. We did a cleanup there in July. City staff came out and assisted with that cleanup effort. So we have been talking to the City about what we see happening. And actually the gateway triangle came out of the City's gateway bridge idea. And then someone from our committee came up with that idea. So that's how we changed the name of it. So what we plan on doing now is reviewing this draft plan done by the consultants, refining it to what meets sort of the other concerns that are brought up and then moving forward on looking at some funding options. One being, of course, an MSTU which is very popular in the County side. And the Bayshore area which is, of course, connected to this in some degree has already set up their MSTU for their work or looking at the possibility of a CRA. My experience with CRAs are -- it's not really appropriate unless you're actually going to buy property in a lot of cases. And 2 think that's why it lends itself pretty well to the triangle because there is a lot of discussion about some land assembly where -- whoever is the CRA board could actually help the developer close on some of these properties if they were looking at doing a major redevelopment project, such as in this triangle -- within the triangle. MR. WRAGE: Are they doing any architectural standard guidelines right now along Davis Boulevard in the area of the triangle? MS. PRESTON: No. It would just fall under the County standards. MR. DAVIS: Well, some new -- like St. Vincent DePaul built a new building -- MR. WRAGE: But that pawn shop that went up with that chain-link fence around the front of it and no shrubbery -- nothing. I don't understand how that got through. MS. PRESTON: That was a big complaint from the folks in the neighborhood. One thing they wanted banned is chain-link fences. MR. ABERNATHY: Has that area historically been in District Four commission or did it move in there as part of a redistricting? MR. OATES: It's been there quite a while, Ken. MR. ABERNATHY: Quite a while it's been the responsibility of District Four? MR. OATES: Uh-huh. MR. ASHER: Was there any consideration of mixed'use, residential/commercial, within the same structure of development? It seems like this is kind of isolated. It may not make sense. I was just curious. MS. PRESTON: Well, I'm not sure about right along the corridor. We didn't talk about that too much. But one thing that did come up is in this residential neighborhood that they wanted to encourage more home business opportunities. There isn't a lot of area within the County that is sort of affordable for small businesses or to set that up as like -- but you'd have to be very careful because I think you also have a lot of sort of construction trade that lives within the triangle. So you don't want to run into the problem of trucks being parked out and, you know, Page 3 6 January 29, 1998 being a little bit more intense than what some of the neighborhoods would want to see. r4R. KOREST: Who is paying for the cost of the study? I4S. PRESTON: Well, the study was done -- our planning department has funds within its operating budget. Our study was not very expensive. We paid $15,000 for the consultants to come in and -- MR. KOREST: The point I'm trying to make is: Are the property owners buying into it through participating in some of the costs? Because that does get their interest. >~S. PRESTON: Right. And that's what we see happening on Bayshore. Bayshore has raised $10,000 to bring in a consultant. The folks up here we haven't had any kind of interest like that Financial interest. · .Although, the next fund -- ! mean, the next step, of couzse, is identifying the funding. They could go ahead and set up an ~4STU, which would let them at least tax themselves a little bit for some of the -- ~.!R. YORK: Especially for drainage issues. MR. WRAGE: You have a lot of multifamily that's rental stuff. MR. HOLE: Duplexes. MR. WRAGE: Duplexes. There's an awful lot of that in there. MS. PRESTON: Yeah. Rentals are really the problem. And what the plan had suggested is we encourage home ownership in there. And we're going to be setting up within our residential subcommittee a housing element that would try and bring in some more home ownership. But, you know, with renters the landowner tends to live in another town and so he doesn't really see the need or understand what is going on. So that is sort of a battle that we will have to work with. And if the drainage doesn't get solved there isn't going to be too much reinvestment in the area. MR. YORK: Well, that would be the first subject of the MSTU right; the drainage? ~4S. PRESTON: Yes. So depending on what scale of drainage they want, it could range from a couple hundred thousand dollars to a couple of million dollars. ~R. HOLE: Retention doesn't do a lot of good when you're laying in water. :4S. PRESTON: And, I guess, that is another reason why some people would like to look at totally redeveloping this triangle because that way you could at least bring the land up ~o current standards. MR. HOLE: It's exciting. ~4S. PRESTON: It is. I think it's a very good project and it ties in really well with what is going to happen on 4110 and Fifth Avenue. ~.IR. RIDEOUTTE: The problem with 4110 from our standpoint -- no ma[ter how you feel about the thing -- was it was worked on for two years. They had a multitude of public meetings and everything. And when it gets to the final stage of it, people who had never attended a single one suddenly threw a hand grenade right in the middle of it. Page 37 2 January 29, 1998 MR. MULHERE: We've been there. >~. RIDEOUTTE: So you think everything is going great and you've ~ot ~ke thing in the final phase of it and then somebody says, "Hey, wait a minute." >~S. PRESTON: What was ~nteresting about the Bayshore is we had several Bayshore meetings. We didn't get a lot of participation. But as soon as they created the MSTU and they held a meeting, we had a lot of people that never heard anything about it. Mike was there. He knows. It will be very interesting with Bayshore. ~4R. RIDEOUTTE: Now, don't try to finalize it in an election period. MS. PRESTON: Thanks for the tip. Well, thank you for your time. ~4R. ABERNATHY: Thank you, Debra. ~4R. DAVIS: Thank you. Well, that brings us pretty close to the eleven o'clock hour. Any other topics or comments that anyone has? MR. HOLE: I think the next time we get together ene thing we would be interested in talking about is the major transportation corridors as they go in and out of the City and the styles you want to see in the corridors. That is for next time. MR. DAVIS: Yes. ~R. RIDEOUTTE: Well, we might even get into -- I don't know whether any of you have read it or seen it. But there's an interesting book -- granted, it's written by something of a zealot. There are some good points in it. It's called Asphalt Nation. if you haven't seen it, it gives some real insights into transportation, I think, and makes some very good points. Although, some of ~hem are overdrawn. MR. MULHERE: I think her name is Kay Holt. MR. RIDEOUTTE: It's Kay something, yeah. Maybe the last name is Kay. Anyway, yeah. Kay or Jay or something like that. ~R. MULHERE: She spoke at the planning conference in Naples. The State planning conference was held in Naples. She was the keynote speaker. ~4R. RIDEOUTTE: I would have liked to have met her. ~4R. ABERNATHY: If I could, the comments presuppose we're going to have another meeting. I highly endorse that idea.~ It has been most enjoyable. ~R. DAVIS: ~ have enjoyed it. ~ think -- I know it made me think about some of our own issues a little differently. And that's good. And certainly we share a lot of the common concerns. So just getting together is a -- MR. RIDEOUTTE: Before we meet again -- and I think it would be our %urn to host it -- ~R. HOLE: The chairman buys the donuts. MR. RIDEOUTTE: But I would like to get our group together to have a little get-together and think some more about what sort of agenda we want and everything else with our staff. I tell you this -- I'll share this with you. I'm disappointed and embarrassed that no Page 38 January 29, 1998 member of the planning staff -- City's planning staff is here today. That's an item I will pursue immediately and vigorously as soon as I leave %his meeting. ~4R. KOREST: Maybe we could shoot for something in three months. MR. BRUET: If we set something up -- I think if we set up something, say, quarterly or something like that we would have more of a structure and we could start to get into a rhythm of the issues that we both face. MR. RIDEOUTTE: Right. MR. BRUET: Rather than just sort of throwing stuff on the table, which was a very good start. MR. HOLE: Great meeting. ~4R. RIDEOUTTE: It was a good start. ~R. BRUET: I think something should be structured quarterly. ~.~R. YORK: To talk about variances and -- ~R. BRUET: Yeah. MR. YORK: There are a number of topics. ~R. BRUET: The more we get together the more areas you're going to find need discussion. MR. RIDEOUTTE: Well, Mike and I will get together and set up another meeting in about three months. By that time a lot of the congestion and other things will be out of here. MR. ABERNATHY: Hopefully. MR. RIDEOUTTE: It will be. And we can make a -- ~. DAVIS: That sounds good. Thank you all for coming. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 11:00 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MICHAEL A. DAVIS, CHAIRMAN TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICE BY: Kelley ~4arie Blecha, RPR Page 39 February 5, TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COb~TY PLANNING COMt4ISSION Naples, Florida, February 5, 1998 161; 2 1998 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Planning Commission in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 8:30 a.m. in REGULAR SESSION in Building 'F' of -..= Gover~en~ Complex, 5__~ ~:apies, Florida, wi~h ~he fo~_owing members present: ALSO PRESENT: CHAIRMAN: Michael A. Davis Russell A. Budd Michael J. Bruet Russell A. Priddy Edward J. Oates, Jr. Michael Pedone Karen Urbanik Gary Wrage Bob Fernandez, County Administrator Marjorie M. Student, Assistant County Attorney Robert j. Mulhere, Current Planning Manager Page AGENDA COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WILL MEET AT 8:30 A.M., THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 5, 1998 IN THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING ROOM, · M3MINISTRATION BUILDING, COUNTY GOVERNMENT CENTER, 3301 TAMIAMI TRAIL EAST, EAST NAPLES, FLORIDA: NOTE:ANY PERSON WHO DECIDED TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THIS BOARD WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. ALL MATERIAL USED IN PRESENTATIONS BEFORE THE CCPC WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. THESE MATERIALS WILL BE AVAILABLE FOR PRESENTATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. I. ROLL CALL BY CLERK 2. ADDENDA TO THE AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 18, 1997 and January 8, 1998 4. PLANNING COMMISSION ABSENCES: 5. BCC REPORT 6. CI-LMRMAN'S REPORT 7. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: Pennon No. V.07.15. Kenneth D. Goodman, representing Lana S. Chadwick. requesnng an 0.5 foot after. the-fact variance from the required 30 foot side yard setback for the principal structure, along thc south property Line to 29.5 feet: a 4.0 foot after-the-fact variance fxom the required 30 foot side yard setback for an accessory structure, along the south property line to 26 feet: a 13.3 foot variance from the required 30 foot s~de yard setback for a tennts court along the north property line, to 16.7 feet: and a 2.0 foot after-the, fact variance from the required sm~cture-to.structure setback of l0 feet for the separanon between the principal structure and a tennis court, to 8 feet for property located at 118 Cajeput Drive, further described a~ Lot 14. Block L, Pine Ridge Extension. (Coordinator: Fred Reischl) Petition No. V.97-16, Karen K. Bishop of Project Management Services, Inc., representing Jeffrey Piipponen, requesting a 2 foot variance to the required height for fences from 6 foot to 8 foot for property known as 'Longshore Lakes PUD, in Secuon 20, Township ,18 South, Range 26 East. {Coordinator: ~J:tr',tm Badamtchian) Go Petition No. V-97.17, D"niel ~d Marg~,'~t Kelly r~uestiag · 22.9 foot after-the-fact van"nee fi'om the required side yard setback of 30 feet to 7.1 feet for prol~rty located at 6831 Sandalwood Lane, further described ss the west 150 feet of Tract 37, Golden Gate Estates Unit No. 35. (Coordinator. Ray Bellows) Petition No. ST-97.2, For Special Treatment Development perrmt to allow construction of a commercial office park on property zoned C-I a pornon of which has a Special Tream~cnt (ST) Overlay, in SecUon 12, Township 49 Sou~ Range 25 East, Collier County Florida. (Coordinator: Steve LenbergerJ Petition No. PUD-87-31(3), Timothy W. Fergnson and Dominic Gad·let· representing SSG Land Trust, requesting a rezone from "PUD" to "PUD" for the Pl~cd Unit Development known ss Gadalc~ having the effect of amending the Gad·let· PUD in response to requirements of Section 2.7.3.4 of the Land Development Code, Resolution 97-134, for property located on the west side of Old Tarot·mi Trail North/Old U.S. 41 North (C.R.. 867) ,nd immediately contiguo~ the Lee Cou.uty boundary line in Section 10, Township 48 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florid~ containing 19.3 ac'rea, more or less. (Coordinator: Ron Nino) (Continued from the meeting ofl"nuary 15, 1998) Petition No. PUD-84.7~6}, George L. Varnadoe of Young, vanAssenderp & Vain·doe, P.A., representing DY Associates Joint Venture, a Florida General Pa.rmership, for · rezone fi'om "PUD" Pla~med Unit Development and "A" Rural Agricultural to "PUD" PlAnned Unit Development. having the effect of amending the Fiddler's Creek pomon of the Marco Shores PUD "nd adding 1,385 acr~ thereto while holding constant the currently authorized number of dwelling units, namely 6,000 for the fiddler's Creek portion of the M~rco Shores PUD lying in Se~:tions 13, 14, 1:5, 22, 23 ~nd 24, Township 51 South, R.sage 26 East and Sections 18, 19 and 29, Township 51 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. consisting of 3,763.99 acres, more or less. (Coordinator:. Ron Nino) (Companion Item DOA-97-3) (Continued fi.om the meeting of January 15, 1997) Petition No. DOA-97.3, George L. Varnadoe of Young, vaaAssenderp & Vain·doe, P.A., representing DY Associates Joint Venture, a Florid~ General Parmership, for aa ~nencbncnt to the Marco Shores/Fiddler's Creek Development Order 84-3, as amended for the purpose of adding 1,385 acres to the Fiddler's Creek pomon of said development order, "nd companion Plaxmed Unit Development zoning regulation, and to adopt a new Master Plan for said added area while leaving constant the currently authorized number of dwelling units, namely 6.000 for the Fiddler's Creek portion of M~rco Shores. said additional land area is located in Section 18. 19 and 29. Township 51 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida. ICoordinator: Ron Nino) (Comp·moo Item PUD-g4.7(6) (Continued from the meeting of January 15, 1997) Pel~tioa No. PSP-97.17. Blaiz A. Foley, P.E., of Coastal Engineering Consultants, Inc., represenUng George Vukobratovlch of Welsh Companies. requesting Preliminzry Subdivision Plat approval for Willow Park Commercial Subdivision. located on Airport-Pulling road (CR. 31), directly south of Princess Park. in Section 1. Township -;9 South. Range 25 East. consisting of 11.36 acr=s. ~Coordmator: Ron Nino~ (Continued tnde finite) Petition No. PUD-82-33(1), Michael R. Fernandez. AICP. of Planning Development lncorporatecL representing Hang Manufacmnng Corporation, requesnng a rezone from PUD to PUD known as "Wiggins Bay" for the purposes of eliminating commercial land uses on commercially designated wact and replacing same with a seven 17) story residential buildingis) containing 56 dwelling units for propen'y located on the southeast corner of the tntersecnon of Vanderbilt Drive and Wiggins Pass Road. in Sccnon 16. Township ,18 South, Range 25 East, Collier County. Florida, cons~sung of 148.26 acres. ~Coordmator: Ron Ninol Petition No. PUD-90-36fl), Dwight Nadeau of MeAnly Engineering and Deslgtt, Inc.. representing Colomal Equines, Inc., requesting a rezone fi.om PUD to PUD, for the Planned Unit Development known as Saddlebrook Village having the effect of repealing and readoptmg a new PUD Document and Master Plan m response to action taken pursuant to Section 2.7.3.4 (Sunsettmg}, Resolution No. , for property located on the north side of the intersection of Radio Road and Davis Boulevard, lying south of Inter,ale 75. in Secuon 34, Township 49 South, Range 26 East, consisting of 33.79 acrts. (Coordinator: Ron Nino~ 2 Ko ,%t. Petinon No. R-97-I0, Michael R. Femand~-z, MC'P, of Planning Development In ted. repr~enting .lames W. Tobm, Fire Chief, as representanve for North Naples Fire Control and Rescue District requesting a rezone from "A" Agriculture to "PS' Public Service for the development ora ftm station for property, located south of Pine Ridge Road, approxtmately !6 mile west of 1-75, in Secuon 18, Town.ship 49 South. Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida, coosssnng of 4.28 acres, more or less. tCoordinator: Ron Nino~ Petition No. R-97-1 I, Dwight Nadcau of' McAnly Engineering and Design, Inc., representing James R. Colostmo, Trustee of Ultimate Land Trust, requesting a rezone from "PUD" Planned Unit Development to "A" Rural Agricultural with an "MHO" overlay for property located on the north and south sides of tmmokalce Road (C.R. 846), in Sections 17, 20, 29 and 30, Township 48 South, Range 27 East, Collier County, Florida, consisting of 1,3'/4.09 acres. (Coordinator: Ron Nino) Pennon No. CP-97.3, proposed adoption of t~tt amendment to the Growth Management Plan pertaining to Fiddler's Creek portion of the Marco Shores DRX (Adoption Hearing). (Coordinator: Wayne Arnold3 9. 10. I1. OLD BUSINESS NEW BUSINESS DISCUSSION OF ADDENDA ADJOURN Z'$,'98 CCPC AGENDA/md February 5, 1998 I'll call this meeting of the Collier County Mr. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Planning Commission to order and begin by calling the roll Pr'ddy. ' COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Here. CiCAIRMAN DAVIS: ~,Is. Urbanik? COMMISSIONER URBANIR: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Budd? COMMISSIONER BUDD: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Bruet? CO~&MISSiONER BRUET: Here. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Davis, here. Mr. York. Mr. Oates? COMMISSIONER OATES: Here. CHAIPdVL~N DAVIS: ~.~r. Pedone? ~: - ~ . CHAI~.Ud~ DAVIS: :.!r. Wrage. CO~4ISSiONER WRAGE: Here. C}~IRMAN DAVIS: i want to begin by welcoming our newest member from down on ~4arco island, Karen Urbanik. Glad to have you with us, Karen. COMMISSIONER URBANIK: Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Karen was appointed at the commission meeting this past Tuesday. Any addenda to the agenda? It appears that we need a motion to continue item H indefinitely. COMMISSIONER OATES: So moved. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion by Mr. Oates to continue Item H indefinitely, seconded by :.Ir. Priddy. MS. STUDENT: Mr. Chairman -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Ail those in favor, signify by saving aye Opposed? - ' (No response.) CHAIR_MAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. Yes, Miss Student. MS. STUDENT: There's a question about Item 7(A) and I'm conferring with ~he attorneys in the hallway right now. Could we ~ust have '~'ou for ti~e momen~ continue ~ha~ un~il later on in ~he agenda, ieasu for ~he time being? There may be a problem with i~, so -- CHAIR/YUAN DAVIS: Okav. MS. STUDENT: -- i need -~ talk ~o %hem out in %he hail. CHAI?~MAN DAVIS: All right. MS. STUDENT: So, if you'd do that, i'd appreciate it, so maybe last on [he agenda. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Ail right,,.. MS. STUDENT: Thank CHAIRMA~ EAViS: ~(A). Okav. - think -- did i see Mr. Arnold in the room here? COb~ISSIONER OATES: Yes. CHAIRMA~ DAVIS: We -- if we read -- what we read in the newspaper is correct, on behalf of the board we'd like %o wish you Page Z February ,~ 6~ 5 1998 luck in your new endeavor. MR. ARNOLD: Thank you ';e~f much. CHAi~d3kN DAVIS: And we're sorry -- >!R. ARNOLD: i appreciate that. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Sorry to see you go, of course. MR. ARNOLD: Yeah. i have mixed feelings as well. i've been here for eight years this week and it's been a good ride and i've no complaints and i'm really looking forward to being back here doing some work to help the county in some other capacity. C01~4ISSIONER OATES: Good luck to you. COMMISSIONER BRUET: See him at the other podium. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah. So, this means you get more work, Bob? :,IR. I.~LHERE: Yeah, and no money. CHAi~.ULN DAVIS: Probably. We have two sets of minutes up for approval. COM/dISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, I have a question. Why should poor Mr. Nelson be counted absent in both of these when he had to get off %he board? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah. I think -- good observation. I think he was -- had been required to resign -- COMMISSIONER OATES: Right. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: -- so that he could assume his role on the Marco island Planning Commission. I think that's correct. We should let the record show that he, in fact, was not absent He wasn't with us anymore. ' COMMISSIONER OATES: That's right. Other than that then, I'd move for approval of the minutes. CO~MISSIONER PRIDDY: Second. CHAIRM. AN DAVIS: That would be for both sets of minutes Mr Oates? , · COMMISSIONER OATES: Yes. Please. CHAIRblAN DAVIS: Motion by Mr. Oates to approve the minutes of bo[h December iSth and January 8th, seconded by Mr. Priddy. All those in favor, signify by saying aye Opposed? ' ~No response.) CHAI~4AN DAVIS: That carries unanimously. Any Planning Commission absences? CO:~MISSiONER OATES: i will be absent the next meetin~ on ~he CO~ISSI©NER BUDD: And Z will also, Mr. Ckairman. CHAIPJ4A2~ DAVIS: Okay. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Which country are we going co now? COM/4ISSIONER OATES: Kenya. C©~MISSi©NER PEDONE: i'll have to leave early because i'm colng -o ~;e,..; 'fork. - C?LAI~4A~N DAVIS: Ail right. Well, :t sounds 'ike we're -- we're .~:' ! solid on a quorum so we should be in good shape. Anything under BCC report, Mr. Mulhere? MR. :'~LHERE: Not specifically, however, I believe that Miss Page Februar-/ 5, 1998 if she didn't at the last meeting, will at an upcoming meet!nc Filson, discuss with the board tentative dates for the upcoming LDC amen~r~ent cycle. - You may recall we changed the ordinance to simply re.c~uire tha~ ~he Planning Commission at least hold a single public hearing. You probably will have to have Lwo but at least one of those public tearings be held before the last Wednesday in the month of May. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Uh-huh. :'~. M~JLHERE: And, so, I've asked Sue Fi!son to discuss with :he board :enLa:ive dates in June for them to hear iL and, of course, after that we'll be able to firm up dates for the Planning Commission. But, generally, they're just, you know Wednesday evenings o~ Thursday eve ~ i ~q s . ' iHAi~ 2AViS: Right. MR '. ::=-= · - · .~L.,~_. Generai~y ,:;f weeks from your normal mee~zngs and, so, at this point we're looking at the second and fourth Wednesday in May. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah. I believe the board discussed the hearing dates of the 10th and 24th of June. MR. MULHERE: Okay. That's -- that's what I thought, yeah. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah. Wednesday evenings. So, we -- yeah, we can back off from that and whatever. You maybe at our next meeting can suggest some appropriate dates to us in May. MR. MULHERE: I think we're looking at Wednesday the 13th and Wednesday the 27th of May. And those are 5:05 hearings. We'll tentatively schedule for those, and as we get a little bit closer, if there's some conflict or something, I'm sure, you know, before we adversise we'll confirm with you and make sure that -- that those are still okay for you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. That sounds good. Under Chairman's Report, i wanted to bring to the rest of you the ~dea of a -- our imposing a five-minute limitation on the testimon.z ~ur!ng our public hearings. COM/~ISSIONER OATES: From those that are opposing, you mean? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Well, not necessarily opposing, just public %estlmony. COMMISSIONER OATES: Oh, you mean not the presenter though. CHAI~UIAN DAVIS: Not the petitioner, no. CO[.~[ISSiO~ER OATES: Yeah. Okay. ,2HAi~.~J~ ~" T~ ~¥.a: The petitioner, because - think in the case petition, there -- it depends upon the petition, ~he length -- the necessary length of time for a presentation. This ~s -- you know, this ~s something the ~oard of Count,; ?cm~.zssioners have been doing =or quite some ~ime, and really 'usu a %ime fac%or because, as we know, sometimes -he hearinrs ~an get pretty length,/, and it'- really more for efficiency than an':'uking else. o COM/4ISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, I would like to move tha~ '..:e ~o impose a five-minute limitation on nonpetitioner speakers. Page 4 Februa~g 5, 1998 CO~ISSIONER BUDD: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Discussion on the motion? That was a motion -hat was by Mr. 0ares, seconded by Mr. Budd, was CO~.~ISSIONER 5UDD: Yes, sir. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: All those in favor signify by saying aye Opposed? ' · ~No response.) CHAIRMA/4 DAVIS: That carries unanimously. We're going to continue 7(A) . MS. STUDENT: Yes. The attorneys are still conferring in the hall, Mr. Chairman -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. MS. STUDENT: -- so if ':'ou ccuid ~ust continue ~hat ~o a later Dc'n~ on the agenda, please. -. , -~: Maybe you could let us know when they're ready and we can probably drop that in. So, that would have us beginning with Petition V-97-!6. i'll ask all ~hose present here today that are going to testify on this petition to please stand and raise your right hands so that you may be sworn by the court reporter. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) MR. WRAGE: Mr. Chairman -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yes. MR. WRAGE: -- I'm going to excuse myself because I live in this neighborhood and i have some very definite thoughts about this. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Ail righty. Mr. Wrage is going to recuse himself as a resident of the neighborhood. Mr. Radamtchian. :'~. BADAMTCHI~N: Good morning, commissioners. Chahram Badamtchian from Planning Services staff. Karen Bishop represents Jeffrey Piiponen0 president of Longshore Lakes Foundation, inc., is requesting a two-foot variance from the required fence height of six feet to eight feet. Over the years, the growth the area has brought increased traffic and traffic connected noise on immokalee Road. 'That's why they are requesting this two-feet variance. The staff previewed this petition and recommends ,~eprovai suoj=~- ~o staff stipulations. - CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Questions cf staff? CO:'R4ISSiONER BRUET: I have one. CHAi~,~2~ DAVIS: Mr, Bruet. COMMISSIONER ~RUET: I'm confused as to where this property is exactly. We're talking about noise on Immokaiee Road and yet the arrow ~ndicates some property than's halfway ~nto the property. :.!R. 5AD~.~TCH!~,4: They are asking variance for the entire propert-:-. They have 220 acres site and they're askinc a '..;all the entire property. ..... c .... CO~-E4!SSiONER ~RUET: How did - miss that? C~LAi~4A/W DAVIS: Any other questions of staff? CO~'~ISSiONER 5RUET: So -- Page February 5, 1998 CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I'm sorry. Go ahead. iOMMISSIONER BRUET: So, - -- what the staff is saying is two addit~cnai feet ~n height would have impact on noise, is that ~he issue? :'~. BADAMTCHIAN: Will have an impact on immokaiee Road but since thev are building eight-foot fence along the Immokalee Road, ~hey wish to build eight-foot fence along all other sides so the fence is consistent, the high-top fence is consistent. CO~MISSIONER BRUET: Okay. I -- I just -- I just from my point of ','Jew fail to see what two feet does for noise, i mean, if you're talking 20 or 30 feet, there's impact. Two feet, I -- I just have difficulty understanding that. MR. ?3~;T: Edward Kant, Transportation Services. And, ':ni,aruunaue!.f, _ taus- nave neet asleep. '..,'asn't sworn '..;net '.;e · ~-~ed ~his. hac no 'n~en%~on o~ -- so you may wan~ ~o have me sworn. C~IRMAN DAVIS: if you could raise your right hand, we'll take care of that. (Edward Kant was sworn by the court reporter.) MR. KANT: As you're aware, the -- the Capital Projects Department has been in the last two years doing some retrofitting of noise barriers on a number of roadways. Typically, we are also -- we, being the Transportation and Capital Projects Departments, are pretty well stuck with a six-foot limitation. And many times what we have to do is go in and dc. some creative grading work in order to get the top of the f. ence high enough to attenuate the noise. So, the difference -- and with respect to Mr. Rruet0 the difference between six feet and eight feet can be significant, depending on the -- where the noise comes from, the ,way the houses sit on the other side of the barrier, that ~ype of thing. Depending on what they put up for a fence, they may or may not achieve a perfect amount of noise attenuation. They certainly wiTM achieve some. -' We've had a couple of instances where we've been icoking at heighus as high as ten to 14 feet from natural ground. So, =rom the -ransportation point of view, '..;e would support ~his in tna~ it's consisuent with wha~ we're finding in other parts of the county. Rut we don't. . -- there's no implication here that the county is partakinc iOM/4ISSIODER RRUET: But -- excuse me, Ed. This is not a true noise barrier though, i assume this is just a stucco or block or -- :.IR. KANT: i have no information as to what precisely they're going to put in there. Anything that goes up will attenuate some nozse. Some %'ppes c~ '&ails or fences or barriers are bett=~ than ~thers. ?he -- as an example, if you drive on the newly opened portion zf .=n~.=rbi~t Reach Drive between U.S. 41 and Goodlette-Frank Road, there are some precast concrete-t,?pe walls up there. Those are more decorauive; however, theV do reach an attenuation of, i'm told, Page Februa~t 5, !998 somewhere between five and eight decibels. So, there's a significant ~%enua~ion depending on -- on the perceived value of the noise, ~hat ?hey -- i've seen walls that are built as noise walls that can a~[enuate 20 to 30 decibels but that's not really necessary in these cases. MR. MULHERE: May I -- may I also say that wor~ that we're a little concerned with, you know, having the -- the eight-foot wall running for a long, a long course and sort of looking like a -- just a _arge blank wall and -- however, this area is pretty heavily vegetated along most of the area where the wall is going to be put in, but that's why we put the stipulation that they would have to submit a landscape plan to provide additional landscaping where the existing '.'ege~atlcn ',.;as deficien~ so it would, you know, provide for a better visual ~mpact, you know, aesthetic impact rather than jusn having the eZgh~-foot wall running with no -- no plantings on the outside of it. So, I think visually, you know, we're comfortable with that it will look okay. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Will this involve a berm also or is this jus~ going to go on the existing grade? MR. BADAMTCHIAN: It's going to go on an existing grade. They're not proposing any berm. CHAIRM;uN DAVIS: Any questions of staff? Miss Bishop? MS. BISHOP: Good morning. Karen Bishop for the petitioner. The only thing that I'd like to point out is -- one is that we are in fact going to build the wall that's on Vanderbilt, those precast walls. That is, in fact, what we're planning on building. The vegetation will remain that's existing there. We will weave the wall in and out of the existing vegetation to take advantage of what's already there. The stipulation that's -- the one stipulation in the staff's report that i would like to change a little bit is the connection to ~he future neighbor to the east and that at the time where that connection is required, then we will -- you know, we wSll allow for 5ha[ openzng, but other than that, this wall will probably be phased, no~ al' built at one time. Along the immokaiee Road co~_~or~ ' ~s %ke ~irs[ phase of that project. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: So, what you're saying is, is to state change -- there's apparently a -- ~he stipulation to where that interconnection = needed. :.IS. BISHOP: Right. That it would be at our expense to make sure ~t ~s available for the neighbors. MR. BADAMTCHIAN: Staff has no problem with tha.t. CHAi~uXN DAVIS: Okay. Then staff seems 5o have no problem with -ha[. Any ~destions of the petitioner? Thank you. Anyone else here today to speak on this petition? Seeing none, i'll close the public hearing. Page 7 2. February 5, 1998 COI-~2MISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, I move we -- we -- CF~Ai~4AN DAVIS: Recommend? CO~,~ISSIOMER OATES: -- recommend approval to the BZA for Petition V-97-!7. COM/~ISSIONER PRIDDY: Second. CHAIRMJ%N DAVIS: Motion of recommendation of approval by Mr. Oates, seconded by Mr. Priddy. ~ is there any discussion on the motion? CO~4ISSIONER BUDD: it's with a modified staff stipulation? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: That would include the amendment to the future interconnect? COMMISSIONER OATES: Oh, yeah, the interconnect. I'm sorry. CHAi~_MA~ DAVIS: :.~r. Bruet? CO:.E4iSSiO~ER BRUET: i'm ~ust not a fan of even a si:.:-f<~ot block wail, so i won't -- £ can't support the motion buc that's my view. CHAIRMA/W DAVIS: i think the -- the -- Mr. Kant alluded to the -- that new section of VanderDilt ~each Road, that they were up landscaping just yesterday and it's really turning out nice. It really looks -- COMMISSIONER BRUET: It does look good. I -- I believe those are higher than eight feet, aren't they? Just from recollection they seem pretty good size, I mean, true type attenuators. MR. KANT: That's -- that's entirely possible. I'd -- if it's important we can -- we can get an exact number for you but, again, those -- those walls, the basis for those was -- was both aesthetic as well as for any noise attenuation it might achieve. Typically, if -- if it's strictly noise attenuation, it's going to be thicker, it's going to be much more massive. As I said, there -- there is some attenuation, but I believe that between the shrubbery and the -- the way it was cast, the colors and everything, the intent was to make that a little bit more pleasant drive and, of course, to screen that from the adjacent properties. CHAIR/WSkN DAVIS: Okay. With that, we'll call the question. All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? COMMISSIONER BRUET: ~;o. Ci{Ai~3~ DAVIS: That passes three -- six to one, ~vith ~r. Bruet ~/issenting. COMMISSIONER OATES: No. Hr. Wrage. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: ~:o. ].!r. Bruet. CO~,D~ISSiO~;ER OATES: Oh, pardon me. i'm sorry. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: And ~4r. Wrage abstained. CO~,~ISSIONER OATES: I beg your pardon, i'm sorry. >~S. STUDENT: Hr. Chairman? C~IRMAN DAVIS: Yes. ],IS. STUDENT: i believe on item 7(A), an agreemenc has been reached between everyone. ! think it would be appropriate for either staff or the petitioner to request just the two-week continuance. And everyone, as I understand it, concurs in that. That will not hold up the petitioner for the Board of Zoning Appeals. Page ........... ,,,, ,mmmmmmN i ............. mm---- m ......... Nm February CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. Well, then, in that case I'll -- I'll ~ecognize the representative of the petitioner. MR. GOODMAN: For the record, my name is Kenneth Goodman. i'm representing Lana Chadwick. We have just learned there may be a problem with notice. One serson who's raised that is a next door neighbor, a beneficiary of a %rust who owns property next door. They've asked that this be continued for two weeks. We respectfully request that the commission extend this for two weeks so that it could be heard at that time and still be left on the present agenda for the Board of County Commissioners. CHAIR/~L~N DAVIS: Okay. CO~,~ISSIONER BUDD: So moved. CC>~,~iSS iOHER 5RUET: Second. .S!{Ai~.Ud4 DAVIS: Motion to continue ~tem 7(A) ~or ~wo weeks by Mr. Rudd, seconded by Mr. Bruet. Ail those in favor, signifv by saying aye. Motion carries unanimously. Thank you, Mr. Goodman. MR. GOODMAN: Thank you, Chairman Davis. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Do we need to hang onto our packet material CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Which brings us up to Item C, V-97-17. Once again, I'd ask all those present that are going to testify on this petition to please stand and raise your right hand so that you may be sworn. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Bellows. MR. BELLOWS: The petitioner is requesting an after-the-fact variance of 22.9 feet from the required side yard setback requirement · Df ~0 feet to 7.1 feet to allow for an existing shed to remain as it surrentiy exists. The property owner purchased the property in '83 and constructed 5heir home in '84 and subsequently placed a Ted's Shed on the site 5hat was placed -- built with skids. At that time there was some misinformation given to the o'~er abou~ whether a building permit would be required fo:: a shed fha% was bu~i% on skids. It's -- the Building Department does require a bu~iding permit or did require a building permit at that time. ?he shed was placed in a location that did no~ meet %he setback 5equ~rements. The encroac~ment was discovered when ~he adjacen~ ~;rcperty owner filed a complaint with the county, Code Enforcement. ?he petitioner has decided ~o go for -- ask for a variance Lns~ead of moving ~he shed. if the o'~ner had cbtained a building ::erm~u at %he 5ime %he shed was ~iaced on the size, i~ would have been :~uz ~n ,~ conforming location. However, it's staff's opinion that the granting of this variance will non be detrimental to the adjacent properny owner or affect proper%y values, it's not in -- however, it's not in keeping with the Land Development Code and, therefore, staff is constrained from Page 9 ,I&G' 2 Februa~/ 5, 1998 recommending approval. '?he petitioner has offered an alternative if the ~.' feet ±s deemed appropriate by the ?!arming Board, and that they may be looking at a '5-foot setback, which would have been the setback required the -ime the shed was placed on the site. THAIR~tAN DAVIS: Questions of Mr. Bellows? C©MMISSIONER WRAGE: Is this on a permanent foundation or a t':~icai ?ed's Shed, it's just sitting on the ground? MR. BELLOWS: It's a typical Ted's Shed on skids, yeah. CHAIF~iAN DAVIS: Any other questions? COMmiSSIONER PRIDDY: What -- what would be the problem of -- I mean, ~f you're going to move it, you're going to move it seven and a half feet to get to~5, what's ~he .~'roblem in moving ~~-_ -~c where would ~cnform? >!R. BAD~,~TCHI~: Well, 'he petitioner indicates %hat there's some sloping of the property away from the house and a lot of trees thev would like to protect. They would have to clear some additional trees. And there's also some well pumps that the shed currently screens. And if you look on the attached plan, the shed is basically in front of a well system equipment. The fear is if they move that, then the well equipment might have to be moved or some other action taken. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Or -- or rescreen with landscaping or -- MR. BELLOWS: Yeah. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: -- something of that nature? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Ail right. Time to hear from the petitioner. Is the petitioner here? MS. KELLY: Okay. Did you have a question? THE COURT REPORTER: Ma'am, could you identify yourself for the record? :dS. KELLY: Okay. I'm Margaret Kelly. I'm one of the owners of the property. ,TH~IRMA/~ DAVIS: is -- is there anything you'd like to add to what Hr. Bellows said? HS. KELLY: i -- i believe you have the packet in front of you. You have a picture of ~he shed there and you can see ~hat you can hard~v see it from the adjacen~ property at all and i~ is completely screened by vegetation. if we move it -- well, we'll have to do some relandscaping, probably move ~he well equipment. We'll have to do a little bit more clearing and definitely some fill in because the lot is so _ow that, you know, we would have standing water. CP~IRMAN DAVIS: Okay. Any questions of the petitioner? Thank you. -s %here anyone else here 5oday that would like to speak on peti%ion? If -- please ccme uD to the microphone and state '.,'our name ;or -he record. ' ' HR. GULOTTA: Good morning, commissioners. :4y name is John Gu!orca. I'm the next door neighbor. ?HE COURT REPORTER: Spell your last name, please. Paq¢ ' 9 Februar~y 5, 98 ~ ~R. GULOTTA: G-u-l-o-t-t-a. The shed was placed there, it can be moved. There's no · .'ege%a~ion ,Dr trees or anything out front to stop it. .And the trees that Jo obscure it from my property are melaleucas, which the neighbor has asked me to remove, which i don't want to remove until after the shed is moved. And, like I say, the shed was just put on there on a lime rock base and there's no trees in front or anything else that can be dragged. The property is 600 or 700 feet deep. There's plenty of Diaces to put the shed on the property that it doesn't have to be against the property line. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. Thank you, sir. Anyone else that wants to speak on the petition, please come f~r~.~ard? ].:S. KELLY: ~4ay i ressond? CHAI~IAN DAVIS: I'll -- i'll give you some time at th(: end, yes. ~4R. :~cCANDLESS: [4y name is Lyle McCandless. I have my home on %he next five-acre tract away from the gentleman that just spoke. Since that building is a Ted's Shed on skids, I would be very much concerned about amending that setback, especially for that small of a reason. If it was a more considerable building on a slab, I might be a little bit more sensitive to it, but I -- I oppose adjusting that setback under the conditions that are suggested. I -- I don't want to see a precedent set there. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you, Mr. McCandless. MR. McCANDLESS: Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any other speakers on this patition? Miss Kelly, if you'd like to come back up and add a few things? :~S. KELLY: Okay. I'd like to add that the precedent has already been set. There are numerous structures in our neighborhood that are much closer than 15 feet to the property line. I have pictures with me. I do have pictures in that packet of the adjacent property. Their garage appears to be about 15 feet or one-~enth of the property width from their property line. :.[y proposal also, if -- if we have to move the shed, what we could do with it, we could pivot the shed and that would -- we would be able r.o use ~he lime rock base it's still on. We would have a 15-foot setback then, which is exactly the same setback, I believe, that our adjoining neighbor, who complained, has for his garage. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Okay. Thank you. >!r. Bellows, in your research on this petition, did you discover any other variances that have been granted in -- in the immediate area for outbuildings? ~.[R. BELLOWS: Not in the immediate area. I've contacted Code Enforcemenn and they've looked into some several, what appear to be ncnconforming structures, and as far as he's been able 5o nell, that they were issued with building permits with -- at the time ~he setback requirements were ~en percent of the lot width. They are, therefore, conforming. C}~I~JkN DAVIS: Okay. All right. Thank you. Page ! 1 Z February 5, 1998 Any other questions of staff? Anyone else to speak on the Seeing none, ''!1 close the public hearing. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Mr. Chairman, i recommend that we deny [his petition. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Second. C~AiRMAN DAVIS: A recommendation to the BZA, recommendation of .denial by Mr. Priddy, seconded by Mr. Bruet. Discussion? All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAI~4AN DAVIS: That carries unanimously. CO~.~4ISSiONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, is there any possibility we ~ulch% consider the '5-foot ~3etback which was ~he s~andard a~ the time 5his was in vogue? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Is there a -- any inclination of this board to do so? Apparently -- well -- COMMISSIONER OATES: I'll tell you what. I'll make the motion that we allow them to set it back 15 feet from the property line rather than the 30 feet that's now required. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Is there a second to that motion? COMMISSIONER URBANIK: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion by Mr. Oates to recommend a 15-foot setback to the BZA, seconded by Ms. Urbanik. Discussion on that motion? All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Aye. COMMISSIONER BUDD: Aye. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Aye. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Aye. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Aye. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I'm sorry. Mr. -- in favor of The motion, Mr. Wrage, Mr. Oates, Ms. Urbanik, and was there anyone else? Three, so it fails, five to three. Okay. With that, we'll move on to ST-97-2. Once again, i'll ask ail those present that may want to speak on ~his petition to please stand and raise your right hand so tha~ 'you may be sworn by the court reporter. SHAi~4AN DAVIS: Thank you. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) MR. LENBERGER: Good morning. For the record, Stephen Lenberger, Planning Services. ?he applicant here is requesting a special treatment development permit %o construct an !i-building commercial office park. The property is located on the northeast corner .of Airport Road .and Pine Ridge Road jus~ north of The Sports Authority. On the wall here, I have a site plan. The property is rectangular, it's 3.76 acres in size. The ST overlay ,on the proper~y PaGe 12 February 5, 1998 is confined to the northwest corner, and that's this black line here. The applicant has moved the structure so all the buildings and parking for this facility will be located outside the ST area. The applicant has approached the South F!~rida Water b~anagement District and they are requiring that a berm be constructed around the perimeter on two sides of the ST area, which is the area in pink that i've highlighted here, and that will be the only area of the ST ~mpac%ed. Pretty much of the ST area is a cypress forest. There's some 'ransi%ional pines next to it. If you have any questions, I'll be more than glad to answer them. COMMISSIONER BRUET: I do. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Bruet. C~.~4ISSiONER BRUET: -'m just ~rying to understand how ~his is different ~rom any other pro]ec% %hac comes in. You know, 'y(~u need to -- 'you need to let me know. ~R. LENBERGER: Okay. Well, it has a special treatment overlay. The special treatment overlay is -- COMMISSIONER BRUET: Right. The ST area is down here. MR. LENBERGER: -- from what I have seen, are pretty much wetland areas for the most part, the wettest of the wetlands. They give an extra protection in the code through the ST section. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Okay. MR. LENBERGER: Impacts can be given to them. It has to be granted by the Board of County Commissioners. Petitions of this sort have to go to the Environmental Advisory Board and the Planning Commission for recommendations and they're forwarded to the BCC. CO[~ISSIONER BRUET: Because it has the ST overlay. ~<R. LENBERGER: That's correct. CO~&MISSIONER BRUET: That's the only reason, that it's different than any -- ~4R. LENBERGER: That is correct. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. CF~IRMAN DAVIS: Any other questions of staff? Petitioner? >!R. BUTLER: Gary Butler, agent for the petitioner. i just -- if there are any questions? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any questions of the petitioner's representative? Z.[R. BUTLER: One ~hing i would add is the berm actually helps protect the cypress area. There will be an enhancement to zhat wetland area by installation of the berm. iHAI~43tN DAVIS: Okay. Thank you. Anyone else to speak on this petition tcday? 3eeing none, i'!! close the public hearing, b~otion? COM~4ISSiONER PRIDDY: >Ir. Chairman, i recommend thac we fo~;ard Petition ST-97-2 with a recommendation of approval. COI~4ISSIONER BUDD: Second. CHAIPS4A2q DAVIS: >~otion of a recommendation of approval by b[r. Page 13 Februar~t 5, 1998 Priddy, seconded by Mr. Budd. Any discussion? Ail those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. PUD-87-31(3). Once again, all those present today that may want to speak on this petition, please stand, raise your right hand so that you may be sworn by the court reporter. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Nino. MS. STUDENT: Mr. Chairman -- CHAI~14AN DAVIS: Yes. MS. STUDENT: -- i need %o make a statement for the record. My office has never -- this PUD document has never been submitted to the County Attorney's office for legal review. So, when you approve it, i need to have you approve it subject to legal review that my office may give the document. I understand it was submitted late to staff and so forth. MR. MULHERE: You -- you mean if they approve it. MS. STUDENT: Yeah. If approved, yes. Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: We'll certainly add that stipulation. Mr. Nino. MR. NINO: Yes. There's -- there's a reason fo~ that and I hope it becomes evident as I explain the petition that's before you. We got a lot of PUD -- it is a PUD that is under the sunset provisions, meaning that there has been no development on this property for a period of five years or more and under the provisions of %he Land Development Code, those PUD's have to come back to you and the County Board of Commissioners for reconsideration. The county board, in responding to the sunset requirement, directed that this PUD be returned in six months -- that ~his PUD be returned within a six-month time frame with a new updated PUD that responds ao the concerns of Collier County. The Gadaleta PUD, P-U-D, is located on Old 41 and is immediately contiguous to the Lee County boundary. It currently is used as a driving range. The property to the west of the Gadaleta is the Sterling Oaks development and there is in fact some development approved 5hat is i~ediately contiguous to [he Sterling Oaks development. To the south of the Gadaleta PUD, you recently authorized a conditional use for a nursery. And to the south of that nurse~f is the Arbor Trace PUD, 'which ~s a -- an approved muitifamilv project for affordable housing. The Gadaleta PUD, when 15 was first approved, was a PUD 5hat was approved for 88 dwelling units and two acres of commercial development of %he seed -- not ~o exceed that which is permitted in the C-2 zoning district. ?he purpose -- you know, %he purpose of the sunsetting process is Page 14 1 ', Februaz-/ 5, !998 to achieve consistency with the Growth Management Plan to the extent reasonable. The commercial area is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan or the future land use element and, therefore, staff has recommended that -- that that commercial be deleted from this amended PUD or revised PUD and that the density bonus or the conversion that is Granted for ~hat be 12 dwelling units per acre. The future land use element provides that where you have inconsistent zoning and you wish to rezone it to residential or convert it 5o residential, that the bonus of up to 16 dwelling units per acre is allowed for that -- for eliminating that inconsistent commercial zoning. And, remember, I said up to 16 units per acre. What then becomes -- wha~ -- what then is the appropriate number z~a% %~ey ~u~ht %o.receive a density consideration for e~imina~ng the commercial? And we suggest to you that that becomes an issue compatibility, what is around the property that might suggest %he appropriate density. And I ~hink ~he staff -- or I'm sure the staff report shows tha5 around this project there are multifamily projects or density that is near 12 units per acre and that's why we settled on 12 units per acre. This PUD not only asks to be allowed the full 16 units per acre for the C-2 zoning, but it says, as an option we want to keep the C-2 zoning. It's an either/or situation. We want to retain our C-2, but if we're of the mind to eliminate the C-2, we want a PUD that gives us 16 units per acre. And we suggest to you that that is not an appro~)riate way of zoning land. As a matter of fact, on several occasions when that very issue was presented to the County Board of Commissioners, the County Board of Commissioners says, we don't give either/or zoning. It's you tell us what you want and we'll let you know whether that's appropriate or To make a long story short, we~have -- if you go up to Page 4 of %he staff report, we have a scenario here where the petitioner is asking for 120 dwelling units. They're asking to retain the 88 dwelling units plus 32 for converting, and they're also asking ~o re~ain the commercial, so that they're asking for 120 ~']wei!ing units and zhey're asking to retain the commercial as an opti.3n and to make ~he driving range a permanent use of the property should the petitioner decide or the landowner decide to keep the golf course opera~ing, %he driving range. We suggest %o you that a more -- based on our reccm~endatfon, this petition should be approved for 115 dwelling units, no commercial, and the ability to make the golf driving range a permanent ';se. And let :ne tel! 5'ou why we recommend that. A golf driving range is a -- you' il ail agree probably is a pretty passive ';se of land. -- we do allow a golf driving range as a conditional use in the agricultural zoning district. And as we indicated in our staff report, for the life of us, we could never understand why when this PUD was first approved, %he golf Page 15 February 5, 1998 course was approved only for a short period of time, the driving ~'anqe0 and that time period was that whenever sewer and water became available, you had to terminate the use of a driving range. i don't know what drove that,.quite frankly. Staff has no confidence 5hat that is a reasonable relationship to demand. in keeping with the more literal, the more applicable elements of the Growth Management Plan, the most that could be approved is up to 34 units. And that's based on -- and i -- and I wish to tell you that the County Board of Commissioners is not required to -- to continue the 88 dwelling units that they now have on the seven -- on the nonzoned -- the noncommercial zoned portion of the property in that the base density for this property -- if this were to come in today, %he kase -- the maximum density they could achieve on the -- ~n the -- ~:~ ~'ne noncommercial .~r, ~or ~hat mat~er, the entirety of the Dro]ec~ ~s ~kree dwelling units per ~cre. So, if 'we took the 17.3 acres, which is the residential portion of %he PUD, and multiply that by three, you'd get 52, and if they got %he conversion formula of i6 per -- per acre, that produces another -- that produces 32. The maximum density that the board -- the maximum density that is purely consistent with the Growth Management Plan would be up to '84 dwelling units. In other words, it would be 52 plus whatever conversion that you and the board feel is appropriate for that two acres of inconsistent commercial zoning. Let me say that we -- we're cognizant of the iraplications of significant -- using the sunsetting process affecting significant diminution of the value of property. And we don't think that we ought to come before you and recommend solutions or recommend an approach ~hat is going to invite litigation, quite frankly. So, we have taken a more cautious approach, that is -- and that cautious approach is the 115 dwelling units. That cautious approach says retain the 83 dwelling units. Another -- another wrinkle on this PUD, which is -- which is unique and for which there is no -- we don't understand why that ~iensity was granted, but the original PUD had six dwelling units that · ..~ere supposed to be used for affordable housing. That has no basis under the comprehensive plan ar,d, therefore, our position was that under the original zoning of the property, the ~4F-~ and the agricultural zoning and the ZRO process, they were enti~ied ~o 83 dwelling units and 83 -- in our opinion, ~3 ,!wei!ing '~ni~ plus %he -- ~he 22 units per acre -- the 12 dwelling units ~er acre for the commercial is the appropriate number that should be considered for this PUD. And i -- · take that back. That's 83 and 24, which :s ~3ei!eve %ha~'s what our staff report advises at the tai~ end ~f the -- ~f 5he report. ' The other problem we had is, with all respect to ~r. Ferguscn. '..:e .;e~~ neighbor --. never able to get a PUD document presented tnctuded all of the stipulations of recommending staff, and the reco~T, endations that are within this PUD and, quite frankly, Zor that Page 16 ~lll ---- IIII -- - III IIII IIII I I III 2 February 5, 1998 reason we didn't -- didn't convey it to legal. But I thought i% Lmportant that this Planning Commission address %he substantive ~ssues, is that when this thing goes to %he board, · ..;hat should be its !and use agenda? What is the most appropriate land use response and one that will not invite the -- the petitioner going to %he 'wall in terms of his legal rights? And we suggest to you -- and that between this period and the board, the matter of legal sufficiency can certainly be addressed. MS. STUDENT: Mr. Chairman, there are some issues here about · ;estlng and the comp plan and the zoning evaluation and, quite frankly, I'm going to need to sit down with Mr. Nino, and possibly Mr. Ferguson, and sort that all out, because I will tell you that the case law ,'3~ the State of Florida is that~ if you have zoning and no~hing ..,o~_ ':'ou know, you re not '/ested Now, %here's another open-ended, question. This property ,went through zoning evaluation and how long you get that and how that fits :n with our sunset, if you've got -- does that mean forever or when · you ~ake that together with our code, does that mean you get it from five years from something and then, you know, even though you went to ZRO? And these are, frankly, issues that I need to sort out. And I must tell you that we are supposed to -- any development orders that we approve must be consistent with our comprehensive plan. And I think, the way I see it, based on the presentation from Mr. Nino, is we have two competing things here; consistency with the comp plan and the degree to which this project is vested because of the ZRO, and that's what I'm going to have to sort out. MR. NINO: in conclusion, let me say that our recommendation is as follows: That the provision for any commercial zoning be deleted. in the event it is retained, its land use -- the authorized land uses should only be those C-2 uses that are in the current Land Development Code because the PUD, as structured, the PUD that you have in your packet, not only proposes to keep the C-2 zoning, but they have provided for zoning -- for land uses that are greater than C-2 uses; ~wo, %hat a commercial conversion density -- I guess ! erred when I said 12 -- of ten dwelling units per acre for two ac:'es of commercial ~e allowed for a ~otai number of 20 dwelling units for ~he C-2 -- ~he ~wo acres of C-2 zoning; and, three, that a total of 83 dwelling units be approved for the balance of the property based on the conclusion -hat 5here was no basis in fact to allow six dwelling units as af=ordabie housing, ~hat a golf driving range and accessory and incidental golf practice facility and related management services be approved as an alternative principal use. And if I 'were to add a fifth one in view of the [ssues that Miss 3tuden~ -- oh, ',,;ell, no. And one that is aside from that, i -- i should have a =ifth one here, and that all stipulations, as recommended by reviewing staff and the EAB, be included in the revised PUD document. And the sixth one, which would be the issue that Miss Student raises is the-- Page '7 February 5, 1998 MS. STUDENT: I can't tell you right now wha~ the appropriate density ought to be. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: :4r. Priddy. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Mr. Nino0 let me go back over your numbers. Eighty-three plus ten times two, which is another 20, so you're recommending 1037 MR. NINO: A hundred and five. A hundred and -- you're right, 103. ~4y math isn't very good this morning. You're right. Thank you, Mr. Priddy. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I've heard an awful lot of numbers. MR. NINO: A hundred and three. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: A hundred and three. Okay. ~4R. ~INO: A hundred and three and they're asking -- C©~iSSIONER ~RiDDY: Wai~. ~.IR. ~INO: -- for 120. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: MR. NINO: Correct. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: COMMISSIONER OATES: MR. NINO: Yes. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: A hundred and three with no commercial. Okay. Thank you. But keeping the driving range. And keeping the driving range. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any other questions from staff? MS. STUDENT: I just want a reiteration from Mr. Nino on -- under our comp plan and our density of three units per acre and over the entire PUD, and that's the entire acreage, what is now commercial and et cetera, what does that come out to again, please? MR. NINO: Fifty-two units. MS. STUDENT: Okay. So, we -- MR. NINO: Aside from any conversion of the C-2 -- MS. STUDENT: Right. Okay. MR. NINO: -- which, you know, can be up to 16. ~S. STUDENT: I understand. Taking the conversion of the C-2 out of it and nha~ acreage out of it, then what -- what would zhe result be? MR. NINO: Fifty to 52. ~4S. STUDENT: Fifty-two. Okay. CHAI~ DAVIS: ~4r. Priddy? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Where are we coming up with three units per acre as a base density? I thought we were at four units per acre. ~4R. NINO: No. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Why is this different? MR. NINO: it's in the traffic congestion zone. ~S. STUDENT: Most every place is in that so that's what happens. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: :~r. Ferguson? ~.~R. FERGUSON: On behalf of the petitioner, £'m Timothy Ferguson. i ~irst like -- i would ~ike ~o say zhat when we originally went through zhis process, we went through this process once before when '..re wen~ ~o ~he board, we asked for advice from the board and the board said, ~eave it like it is. You know, we discussed -- we discussed changing the commercial. We discussed everything. The board said, Page February 5, 1998 leave the commercial, leave the 88 units, leave it like it is. :4y client is satisfied with leave it like it is. Okay? So that -- %ha: we can cut right to the chase here. With a little more explanation, we've got several developments chat surround my client's property. They've got 8.5 units per acre, ~.48 units per acre, 8.95 units per acre. The average that I can tell around there is somewhere near 7.5 an acre. And now the county is talking about cutting us to three when everything surrounding us is at least 7.5. Okay? And I -- I'd have to %ell you chat that is spot zoning. You can't -- you can't allow everybody else to do something and then take somebody right out of the middle and make them do something that is far more restrictive. Directl'/ to the east of the property is industrial. ],~o planner '..;il~ tel~ '~'ou that residential and industrial are compatible u~es. ?here's ~o% ~o be a buffer there. The commercial, light commercial use, is a compatible use with industrial. It is a buffer between the residential that we're asking for, and the industrial, which is right across the street. And if we're going to be able to convert the two acres, if we absolutely had to convert the two acres, which we don't want to do, we want to keep the commercial, the board said that they would allow us to keep the commercial. I'd just like to ask staff i~ you can't get 16 units an acre across the street from industrial where can you get it? ' I mean, the -- the ULDC says that we can -- you can get up to 16 units per acre. And if you can't get it across the street from industrial, I would just like the staff to let me know when can you get 16 units per acre, okay, because i believe that across the street from industrial is probably about the best case scenario for the most units in transfer for the commercial. Right now, to make this very simple, we intend to keep 88 units, two acres of commercial, and recreational uses as a permanent use. Now, any time we want to come back, we're allowed under the ULDC to come back and amend the PUD to ask for the 16 units per acre. Tha['s why i added it. I thought it would make it simple. 't doesn't make it simple, we don't -- we don't need to do that. We don't need ~o ,~rgue in the alternative We want 88 and two acres of commerc~ ~ The Gadaleta PUD was -- even -- even taking all the highest numbers, it would be 6.25 acres less than anything around it. And the highest case scenario of 120 units, it's still 6.25 acres. The -- ~he staff's plan -- the staff's repor~ says %hat i~'s compatible with everything surrounding it. ~4ore importantly, this property went through the ZRO and was held ~o be exempt from rezoning. If this isn't rezoning0 ' don't know what ~s Yezoning. This is rezoning. We were required %0 bring %his PUD back ~o ka'/e it changed and that ~s a rezone. ~:ow, either '.ye° re exempt from a rezone or we're not exempt from a rezone and, cer~ainiy, :4argie and - can have some -ime 5o discuss this later, or should i say ~4iss Student. Sorry. :dS. STUDENT: it's okay. it doesn't matter. Page 19 Februa~t D, 1998 >~. FERGUSON: You know, we can discuss that. >Ioreover, when the PUD was required, i mean when ~he PUD was ~ranted, the petitioner was required to put in turn lanes out ~here. He spent quite a bit of money putting in turn lanes on each side of ~he road in order to get into his business, plus he improved his business. He's got a parking lot out there, which was paved, and the county required him to tear the pavement out, which I still don't believe was legal, but he paved it, he -- he paid for the turning lanes, he improved the property, he's got a xeric oak scrub on almost an acre of the two acres of commercial that's been required to be dedicated. Quite frankly, I think he's paid his dues and he's vested. I ~kink he's e×empt because of the ZRO. ' think he's 'o'es~ed because of ~he r~oney. . he's spen~. And - %kink i~e's completely comDatib!e wi~h ~u~'"tnlng surrounding use We're very reasonable with this PUD. We haven't asked to go out and -- and -- and do anything that would harm the -- the road impact. 7he ~raffic -- the ~raffic portion of this states that we're not going to impact the -- the LOS capacity of the road, so frcm what ~ can see, what staff is requiring us to do is take a hit for everybody else in the community and spot zone. And we're certainly not going to accept that. And I don't think by any stretch of the imagination it's reasonable and what we're -- wha~ we're requesting is that you grant the PUD as it stands with the possible exception of the -- the 32 units per acre conversion. We can always come back and amend the PUD for that. We don't -- it's allowable by the ULDC. So, other than that exception, we agree with the staff that it's completely compatible and we disagree with the staff with everything else. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Priddy. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: In the event the two acres of commercial · ..;ere ~eft intact, would you-all agree to C-2 zoning as it now exists in 5he -- :4R. FERGUSON: i haven't conferred with my clients but i believe ~hev probably would. The C-2 zoning, as it exists today, isn't that much difEerent ~han ~he C-2 that -- that my client or~gizaily got and ~here are only a couple of uses that would be excluded. While I do believe that we're vested for those uses, I don't think my client would object to that. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: >~r. ?erguson. since -- i feel a ~itt!e uncomfortable with ~his because it's one thing ~or us to say recommend uo ~he board a petition approval or denial pending legal sufficiency. 7o me, this is more than that. >!S. STUDENT: We!l, ~.!r. Chairman, that's my same problem, and my ~oncern is if you do -hat, you may have delegated vour authority ~o me CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Right. MS. STUDENT: -- and i don't have that authority. And there are some issues and they're important issues. And because i hadn't had ~age 20 February 5, 1998 the document and Mr. Ferguson and I, I think, talked ve~f generally about ~his plight some time ago but it hasn't been recent and i don't keiieve we came to any ciosure on anything. And that's the concern, quite frankly, that i have because, you know, i think if you approved it as it was and -- and, you know, you might argue that it vested, that's one thing, but when everything starts changing, I mean, r really need to find out some more facts. MR. MULHERE: May I just add a couple of things? Number one, this is not the first petition that has gone through %he sunsetting process that also went through the ZRO. The Board of County Commissioners -- perhaps we're not aware of this, but I'll put it on the record. To my knowledge, the Board of County Commissioners has found that the ZRO does not provide a level ~ vesting that e×empts ~ from the sunsetting process. MS. STUDENT: Yeah, %ha~'s -- MR. MULHERE: So -- however, I do agree that there are some issues here that seem to be -- that probably should have been worked out before coming before the Planning Commission, it appears to me. Of course, if you leave the petition the same -- if you leave the PUD the same way that it is, then there are no issues. MS. STUDENT: Yeah. That's the point I was making, if it's left as it is, there aren't any, but -- CHAIFLMAN DAVIS: What I was going to say to Mr. Ferguson, my inclination is to continue this for two weeks. There seem to be some legal issues that need to be worked out. MR. FERGUSON: Well, all I can say is, in all fairness, the county has -- Ron has been trying to -- to work with me on this. And we've gone back and forth and had several different meetings on the ~anguage that I'd have in the PUD. The problem is ~hat staff wants to substantially impact ~he value of my -- of my client's property. It's a Harris Act violation, and we're going to end up in litigation over this. .And ~ don't think that's in anybody's best ~nterest. And, you know, if the board wants to leave it as it is, my client's happy with that. ~f you -- if we're going ~o start down zoning my client substantially, which 5s what the sta. f~ wants to do here, we don't have any choice. COb~ISSIONER BRUET: Mr. Chairman, he makes some points, but I -- i agree with your feeling here is, i'm not sure what we'd be apprcving. I don't know :f we'd be doing the county a disservice on moving forward. - think there's an element within %his process ~hat's been neglected. MR. FERGUSON: i don't have any problem with a continuance. C©MMISSIONER RRUET: i think iz would be to 'four benefit, to be hones~ with you. CH~IFm~iA~N DAVIS: Well, iz -- and 2 think particularly -- :.IR. NINO: Well, zhere are some substantive issues that ! think you can deal with and that need to be gotten out of the way, and that is what is the appropriate amount of density, should the C-2 be eiiminated, which is currently inconsistent wi~h the -- with the Page 2 ! February 5, 1998 Growth Management Plan. ~4S. STUDENT: Well, i need -- I need more -- I can't do that today in this meeting. And -- and i feel that, you know, there's some legal issues involved in this. CHAIRM~ DAVIS: The legal issues -- ~4S. STUDENT: About the density -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: -- are what I was talking about. MS. STUDENT: -- about vesting, consistency with the comp plan and the ZRO and how that fits with sunset. And this gentleman represents that his client has apparently made some improvements or done something, you know, based on this zoning. There's a vesting issue there. CF~IPiMAN DAVIS: What's the feeling of the other board members? ~©~.~ISSIONER ~RIDDY: i'd be inclined to put it o~f -- C©~MISSIONER PEDONE: leah. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: -- because I think -- COMMISSIONER PEDONE: i'll make -- i'll make a motion that we continue this for two weeks. COMMISSIONER SATES: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion by Mr. Pedone to continue this item for two weeks, seconded by Mr. Sates. Is there a discussion on that motion? Are there any -- are there any feelings of the presentation about commercial, no commercial, or anything like that that we might put on the record for staff? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: To me, Mr. Davis, that -- that all hinges on vested rights and, you know, his legal -- legal standing with -- with what he may have already done. COMMISSIONER OATES: in my opinion, Mr. Ferguson is, I assume, telling the truth and if they have made substantial turn lanes and so on and so forth, then they very possibly have vesting. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Well, that will -- with the motion then, we'll leave that issue to the attorneys. And with that, all those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIR/VOkN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. COPfMISSIONER SATES: Mr. Chairman, could we hear Items F, G and M together and then vote on them individually? CHAI.RMAN DAVIS: Yeah. Staff, could you provide us -- is that a good idea? :4R. ARNOLD: For the record, Wayne Arnold, Planning Services Director. Yes, we would -- we would agree with that and would prefer that item, ~ believe, iq, which is the comprehensive plan amendment, be heard first followed by :.!r. Mino's presentation related to the development order of the ?UD°s amendment. CO:~ISSIONER SATES: Do you want a motion to do that hearing first? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah. i think it's -- well, with the Page 22 2 ............ , ,,m,,, , t ii I I I I IIIII III I II February 5, !998 recommendation of staff, there's no reason why we just can't go ahead and hear -rem M first and take them in the order as you suggested, Arnold. >!R. ARNOLD: Well, i would offer that procedurally, i think it would be preferable to have the comprehensive plan amendment heard first :ollcwed by the zoning issues. Unfortunately, in the manner that our agenda is prepared, typically the comprehensive plan amendment issues are placed near the end of the agenda. Unfortunately, we didn't confer with our secretarial staff when they put this together. So, that's really our error and I think we failed to mention that at the start of the meeting. CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Okay. CO[.~4i£SIO~;ER GATES: >!r. ~hairman, ~or the record, i need to state that _ had a conversation with Mr. Anderson and Mr. Varnadoe relative to this petition. I also happen to be a director and the treasurer of the Conservancy of Southwest Florida. And a week ago Tuesday, we came up with a unanimous motion not to oppose this particular petition. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. It's on the record. Any other disclosures? I had a brief telephone conversation with Mr. Varnadoe but it was more procedural in nature. With that, that brings us with Item M, Mr. Arnold. MS. STUDENT: Mr. Chairman? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yes. MS. STUDENT: I just want to state one thing for the record. You don't need to make disclosures on the comp plan amendment because that's legislative and not quasi judicial, so i take it these disclosures were made for the other two items that are quasi judicial, that being the PUD and the DOA. CHAI?dVu~N DAVIS: You are exactly right. MS. STUDENT: Thank you. i just wanted to clear ~hat for the record. Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Arnold. MR. ARNOLD: Thank you. This is a proposed adoption of a text amendment ~o the Growth Management Plan pertaining ~o -he Fiddler's Creek portion of the Marco Shores PUD. You heard this back in October and transmitted it to the Board of County Commissioners, which then transmitted it to the state. We have been in receipt of the Objection Recommendation Comment Report from the State Department of Community Affairs and they had one objection to this plan amendment as it was proposed. They had several comments related to that, three of which were related to sprawl indicators as defined under the state 9J-5 rule. As you're aware, the Fiddler's Creek issue before us is one of reaiiocating some of its 6,000 vested dwelling units to areas outside our urban boundary. The area that's highlighted in red cross-hatching on the map to your left on the -- on the board represents that acreage that's prcposed to be added to the Fiddler's Creek DRI and PUD, but Page 23 February 5, 1998 it's also the subject of the text amendment which would reference that ~hose 6,000 units, already approved can be spread into this area of ~he county. ?hat area is outside our current urban boundary; however, i would 'eli you t?~at it is formerly in our urban boundary and it's still currently under the county's water and sewer service district boundaries. Again, we're dealing with an issue that's approximately 1,385 acres~ and we also have dealt with this issue before related to several ~ %he issues that have been raised previously. And I think what I'd like to do is -- is maybe initially refer to the text that we're proposing and point out that there is one t'.rpographicai error in the proposed text, which is :n the -- the ~eccnd to ~he last sentence ~n %he underlying text, %he ',.,'ord ~2r~Jdic~ion appears, it should be jurisdictional. And i would prefer to go ahead and change that language ~hat we would forward to the Board of County Commissioners. And, again, ~he language provided to us from the Department of Community Affairs is provided in your packet. I would just like to summarize that their objection again was based on three of the 13 sprawl indicators. One of those first indicators was that the plan amendment promotes, allows or designates for development substantial areas of the ~urisdiction to develop as low density -- low intensity or single use development in excess of demonstrated need. And our response to that is simply that this represents less than one-tenth of one percen~ of the county's land area, which does not represent in our opinion a substantial amount of our jurisdictional areas in the county. And, also, we would respond to that that we're adding no new dwelling units and, in fact, we're reducing in the county's invento~t some 277 dwelling units on the subject property. The resulting density decreased for the entire project area goes from about two and a half units per acre down to 1.6 dwelling units ~er acre for the entirety of ~he 3,000 plus acre PUD. 'The second comment by the Department of Community Affairs was %ha~ '..;e needed to address how 5he amendment might fai' to encourage an attractive and functional mix of uses. .And, again, our response is documented in the staff report but :t essentially goes to the -- %o showing that this is [r~%!y a mixed use pro,oct, it conuains not only 6,000 dwelling units but 130 acres of commercial use. it will have neighborhood and maybe even to a level, subregional level, shopping facilities located within ~he project boundary on its adjacent properties on State Road 951. Also in~ernai ~o ~he project is some 60,000 square feet of club area %hat will offer convenience commercial shopping, .a~ning and o~.,e~ ameni%ies for its patrons and members of the club. Another indicator ~hat ~he state wished us to address in more detail was the one tha~ says results in poor accessibility among 'inked or related uses. And i think what we've tried to do here is Page 24 Februa~t 5, !998 show that -- on the map to the left, that is sort of our existing land '~se scenario for this portion of the county, it highlights on the · ipper portion of that map the Lely Resort DRI. The intersection that's State Road 951 and U.S. 41, uhe area -- 'et me step to the map, tf i can. This large yellow area references the current Marco Shores/Fiddler's Creek DRI. You see the other associated development and it's all highlighted in land use density range categories. This being the subject property, we've highlighted areas outside %he urban boundary, which are essentially these. Axed it clearly shows that there's a pattern, including the Boyne South Country Club, other associated mobile home development, recreational vehicle park, industrial property, commercial property and other dwellings. Eym'/ count we have 606 platted lots for development outside ~he '~rban ~oundary beyond,=idd!er's ~'~_~eek boundary. The total cwe~iing' ,]nit count, if i include some agricultural areas tha~ are in~ediately adjacent to this property to the north, south and east, ! come up with asout 1500 dwelling units that are permissible under today's plan. I think it also needs to be said, related to that criteria, that this project is about two and a half miles from the activity center at State Road 951 and U.S. 41. We think it's -- it's really not remote in any way from -- from those services. It will be served by urban services. It's also internally linked, if this area is added, to the existing Fiddler's Creek project which has obviously a road network that serves the project. There are no new project entrance points that will be permitted with this amendment. We believe there are environmental enhancements that accrue because of some regional water management benefits that can be gained by some easements that are being created here and additional water management features tha~ will be coordinated with the existing =iddler's Creek project. Those essentially in -- in a very short time deal with the substantial issues raised by the DCA. I think a couple of o~her points ! needed to ameliorate were that the language here does not permit more than ten acres of wetland impacts on these some !300 acres 3f ~,~nd. it also says tha~ no dwelling units will be located in approximately 300 acres of that site. We know that this has no impact on the public facilities in the county. There are no level of service issues. The:'e's no increase in popuiation that results from this, so there is no !mpac~ on the population projections of the state. I think all these factors, combined with our review of the sprawl criteria, other elements of our comprehensive plan, the Planned Uni- Development document and i~s proposed amendments, the DRI and ;ts amendments, all those issues combined tell us that this :s not an issue uhat the DCA should object to based on the sprawl indicators %ha[ %hey'ye told us that we should address in greater detail. i think i'c's also very important to point ou~ that this really is truly a reallocation of some approved dwelling units into our nonurban Page 25 ..... - ........ lmmlll IIIIII II I I I -- --111 ................ il i i i,~ 2.. February 5, !998 area and I -- just briefly to tell you the nonurban area, this area was =ormerly within the urban boundaries in 1988 when our new comprehensive plan was going through the adoption process. ?hat boundary was retracted and pulled back to what's currently the Fiddler's Creek area, and that area was placed into ~he urban fringe. ?hat issue was well debated at the time and -- and ~ '~.ink you previously saw some of the transcripts of those meetings and some of the documentation provided during the transmittal hearing. I think again, you know, urban boundary is not necessarily the point at which urban and rural begins but it's really an issue of services and the services do exist here. The pattern of development already is there. We have higher density projects that are surrounding this specific project proposal. ~ %k~nk %hat's ~eally a~ i needed ~o address as par~ ~ presentation, i know that :.Ir. Varnadoe has several comments ~ha~ he needs ~o make, and he also has some -- several experts that he has prepared ~o answer questions. !'il be happy to answer any questions that the planning commissioners may have. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Questions of Mr. Arnold? Okay. Thank you. Representative of the petitioner, Mr. Varnadoe? MR. VAKNADOE: Thank you. For the record, George Varnadoe. I'm going to go ahead and address all three, if I can, az the same time, rather than piecemeal. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yes. MR. VARNADOE: I think that's more appropriate. ~S. STUDENT: Has -- have the people -- has eve~tone been sworn then? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: No. I'm terribly sorry. Thank you for reminding me. Ail those present that may want to speak on this petition, please stand, raise your right hand so that you may be sworn by the court reporter. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporser.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you, Miss Student. I'm sorry about that. >~S. 2TUDENT: For the record, Mr. Arnold didn't need ~o be under ©ark for just the comp plan amendment but -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah. Since the testimony is going ~o -- ~4S. STUDENT: -- but if ~hey're -- CHAIrmAN DAVIS: -- certainly pertain Zo -- ~4S. STUDENT: -- certifying that, then that's appropriate. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: -- all the petitions here today. r4R. 'TARNADOE: For the record, George Varnadoe, representing Land Holdings Joint Venture, the developer of Fiddler's Creek. Also here today to address the Planning Commission, 2 have >~ickaei Eedd, who's the presiden~ of Team Plan and they're %he land p~anners for the project. Steve Means and Stuart Miller of the firm of Wilson, Miller, Bar,ch and Peek, the engineers, have done the enviro~mentai consulzing Page 26 work on the project. 2 February 5, 1998 As Mr. Arnold told you, the proposal is to add 1,385 acres of land to the Fiddler's Creek project but no new units. The area to be added is shown ~n the aerial, in this red stripe part of Sections !8 i9 and 29. ' it is important to recognize that Mr. Arnold pointed out nhat we are not moving the urban boundary line. We are simply adding this property into an already existing master plan community, so we're not moving the boundary further east. As far as the development order is concerned, both the Regional Planning Council and your staff recognize this is a nonsubstantial deviation. As far as the amendment to the PUD, the only changes are to add ~he !,285 acres and there's one change I want to cover in the master plan that occurred since we filed our petition. I'l~ cover later. - I think the change is best summed up by Mr. Nino and in his staff report where he says, although the proposed addition of 1,385 acres of land to Fiddler's Creek is a significant increase in the size of the project, considered from the standpoint of its environmental and regional impacts, the change is minor. It does not constitute a substance deviation. The portion of this additional land that will be developed is already cleared and has been used for more than 20 years to grow row cop -- crops. Excuse me. The additional acreage will be used for residential, golf course, open space, lakes, parks, and infrastructure. The 6,000 residential units previously approved, the Fiddler's Creek project will not change. i think it's important to remind everybody a little bit about the history of the Fiddler's Creek project and the history Df the area we're seeking to add. The Fiddler's Creek project is -- for those of you who have been on the Planning Commission for awhile know, arose out of the 1980 -- early 1980's Deltona settlement agreement whereby the state got some i5,000 acres of wetland and Deltona got the rights to build some 12,000 units in this area. 9,110 units were allocated to the original Marco Shores, now Fiddler's Creek project, if you would. The -- probably important also to note that both the Conservancy and Audubon Society, Florida Audubon Society, were signatories to ~hat settlement agreement. Since ~hat -- that original DRI was approved for Marco Shores, now Fiddler's Creek, and the -- the -- this developer took over, there's been a trend of reducing density and adding land. And wi~houn going into a lot of detail, I've got a little charn want ~o pass out. >Iarjorie, would you help me with that, please? I'll put it into ~he record. The number of units has decreased over the years from 9,1!0 to 6,000, a decrease of 3,110 units. While we've added 2,000 -- excuse me -- 2,098 acres, the density has gone from 5.5 units an acre with Page 27 III II Iii Z February ~, ~998 this proposal to 1.6 units an acre. There will also be a reduction in the total number of units that can be buil% in the county as a result of this change in that the 277 u~its that could be built on the 1,385 acres under the existing zoning o= one per five acres will be eliminated. And probably more importantly from the long-term perspective, if the goal is to reduce buildout density in the county, you're taking 1,385 acres out of the inventory for the future. As we all know, as time goes on, there will be more and more pressure to develop this land at much greater intensities and densities than we're talking about, so I think that if that is a goal, then this -- this is going the right way towards taking this out of the inventory as opposed to having future development proposed for ::his ac a higher density. As Wayne noticed, in this area, until '89, this whole corridor out to the Collier Seminole State Park was in the urban area. And during the '88-'89 comp plan amendments, it was removed from the urban area at the urging of planning staff; namely, Charles Gauthier, who was director of long-range planning at that time. The reasons were mainly concurrency driven. Number one, there was no management plan in place for this area and no money to implement one if it had been in place. Number two, there were concerns about evacuation of Marco Island over two lane then county road, now State Road 951, particularly with the 12,000 units that had been allocated to the Marco-Deltona settlement agreement. However, everyone concerned recognized that this area would be ripe for development in the future when those problems were addressed. Mr. Gauthier said in the growth management process tail section, that would be referring to the corridor out there, has water management problems but it will be suitable for intensification after improvements have been made to County Road 951 and the Watershed Master Plan has been developed. As you all know, both of those have occurred. State Road 951 is partially four laned and the other portion is to start this year in Oc[ober. The Watershed Master Plan has been adopted and this project is a large parn of the implementation of that plan in nhis area. As Wayne told you, there's some 812 acres either north or east of 5his proposed land addition that are out there, outside the urban area, ~hat are zoned for other than agricultural uses. My count, ~t's more like 2,000 units, when you counn the mobile home units along with the residential units and the RV slots. But ~here's a substantial amount of development outside the urban area .east of and north of this property and the reason :s i~ was currently -- in was ~ormeriy in the urban area, so it was allowed to deveioD nonurban uses -- or nonrural uses, excuse me. The one change i want to note on the master plan, I think it would be best pointed out by referring to the existing approved master plan, which is the master plan on this board. in discussions with the Conservancy regarding the Growth Page 2 8 1 6G"' 2 Februa~f 5, !998 Manacement ~lan amendment and why we did not think ke o~ concern, ~he question came up, well, if you're adding 1,285 ~cres of land ~o your project, is there something on your existing project that you could preserve in addition to what you have already preserved? We had like 493 acres, is there more that you could ac[ually preserve? we looked at it, and the one area that jumped immediately to mind is what we call the peninsula, this area here. During the permitting process, that was of some concern to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission in that there is some uplands in there and also some wetlands that -- because of the settlement agreement, we were allowed to develop, but that mosaic of different types of h~bi~at are one of the ~ew places in ~hat area where you do have any uDiands ~o ci';e a differen~ ~e of habitat. The sum and substance of it is that we have agreed not to develop the peninsula. That 63 acres will either be deeded to the state or placed in a conservation easement to the state. You can see on the new master plan, that area is now green for the conservation situation. Also, on the new plan, and you will probably see it better on the aerial photograph than anywhere, the areas that have not been disturbed by farming will almost all entirely be in conservation. It will be some 450 acres that will be in preservation and not developed. The development will occur only on the already disturbed land the farm fields. ' Like I said, 450 acres will be preserved. There is 575 acres in addition that will be used for golf course, open space and lakes, which leaves us with a little over 350 acres that will actually be used for residential development and infrastructure. For those of you who like figures, about 74 percent of 1,385 acres will be in some form of open space. i've got the boys from Wilson-Miller here to talk about the environmental question if we need to, but let me just summarize very, very briefly. i think the bottom line question is, will this area be better of= from an envirou~entai perspective with our addition of this land or not? And I think the question is, undoubtedly it will be better off for several reasons. ?irsu, as I said, ~hey're going to be preserving all uhe natural areas and the 63 acres that constitutes the -- the -- well, like 63 acres ~hat constitutes the peninsula. Second, as you can see from the master plan, we are continuing the =Dreader wauerway or spreader swale system on %he souznern Soundary of ~he property or the southern boundary o~ the project, 5hat we are -- part of 5he project we are developing, rather, and that separates forms of buffer or barrier between the development and the ~reserva~ion areas. ' That also -- that waterway is an addition to the regular water management system and the southern edge or downstream edge is at grade Page 29 ~ I I III ' - I I III I I1'11111 I '---I I · - Februa~t 5, 1998 so that as the water from the water management system goes into that, %hau spreader waterway, it will then -- can sheet flow into the wetlands, a much more normal discharge than you get with the pumping operations from the current farm operations. We are helping the county implement the water management plan, as I said. We are -- we have granted an easement to the county along eastern side of Sections 18 and 19 to help Mr. Boldt flow the water south and southwest as opposed to pushing it back up to Henderson Creek and down into the Rookery Bay sanctuary. That -- when we do our development, that discharge will go into that spreader swale system so those waters from all sites will also bleed into the wetlands as opposed to being point discharged into the system. The project will stabilize the ground-water table and more c~ose.y approximate historic conditions. We will also con,roi %he hydro periods around the existing wetlands on -- in the development parcel so as to beuaar protect those. With that, what I'd like to do, Mr. Chairman, is turn it over to Michael Redd for a minute to talk about some of the features in the plan. One of the things that did not come out in the DCA comments were the features of the plan, how they interrelated in the functional nature of those. They looked at the Growth Management Plan amendment unfortunately, that we think in a vacuum and did not -- and also consider the notice for proposed change the development order in the PUD document which they should have when you put them all in a package like that. But I'd like to have him cover some of those features for the record so that we can have on the record going to DCA. Mr. Redd, as I said, is the president of Team Plan, has over 30 years of planning experience. I think he will be able to convince you that this is -- there is an attractive and functional mix of uses in the project. There's a good interrelationship between the residential and nonresidential uses and those uses are linked appropriately, and thau uhe addition of this land will increase, enhance the quality of life of the Fiddler's Creek residents. So, I would like to put him on, if I could. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Please do. MR. VARNADOE: Michael? MR. REDD: For ~he record, Michael Redd of Team Plan. ?his is a bi% -- i'd call this a classic planning application since we're designing a mixed use community and a design of a mixed use community is not just an expansive housing picked up and placed down somewhere, it's got to have an attractional -- attractive and functional mix of uses. And we believe that's what we have. Let me explain some of the major elements; master plans are simply composed of the major elements, and begin with the obvious, which is 6,000 dwelling units spread over the entire area of the project. These are varied housing types; attached, detached, pretty much the broad spectrum of housing. Page · 2 February 5, '998 Obviously, our circulation system may not read so well but one of %ke %hings '..;e like to do is to create what we 'call a iooD road boulevard. Loop roads are a way to accomplish a number of items, and iz links all the neighborhoods but it doesn't allow any through traffic ~o go ~hrough these local neighborhoods. It links all :he land uses without having to bisect any of the land uses and it links all the recreational areas similarly. We have now four golf courses, a total of four golf courses, on ~he entire project. In the center of the project at the intersection of the two major roads, the two largest roads, we have what is really the nexus of any community. You're going to have a -- in any viable community %hat's got an attractive lifestyle to it, you need a center, a [c'../n center, if you '//ZZi, and we call it our community cence~ club -- club facility. ~, And it is a 60,000 square foot facility and it's -- contains a number of cultural and social and recreational items, it has rooms for social gatherings and meeting rooms and fitness, obviously, and has outdoor plazas and open spaces for civic events. It might be a Fourth of July celebration for the community or the Christmas pageant. It's also located on the main pedestrian movement system, which links the entire community to all the neighborhoods and all the recreational facilities. It's a very large pool, 10,000 square feet. I think that might be the largest pool in the county by the time we're done, and has bars and restaurants and nighttime dining and so forth arts and crafts room -- rooms. ' Another of the -- the fourth element of a viable community, obviously, is a commercial component. And a community of this size is demographically going to drive a demand for about 420 000 square feet of commercial. ' A large measure of that, probably close to 90 percent, is served cn-si~e between the two areas on 951 and 41, two commercial areas, and that -- thaz will serve abou~ 325,000 square feet of :he zotai. One of our clients -- within that 325,000 square feet is what we call a neighborhood center demographic demand. One of our clients is Florida's largest developer of what we call large footprint food ~hops. Zt's the Publix or the Winn Dixie. They're nc'../ approacking 45, ~5,000 square feet. So, that would obviously occur in this area right here and with an at~endan[ 100,000 square feet or so that would serve ~he primary .... ~e_ciai resail needs of zhis community. But ~kere's also a secondary commercial need, the small things, and [hat's also served within the community itself. You'll have a of re[ail opportunities at the club center, at %he golf club, your ~ro skops, dining, beverage experiences and so forth. ' We -- %he fifth element of the master plan is what Z think is a ·;ery iove!y lake system, 688 acres, all linked, acting as backdrops for the community, acting in many cases as recreational opportunities. We also incorporated a tennis center with 23 tennis courts. Z ~us~ want to address for a few moments some of the advantages Page 2 1 Februa~f 5, 1998 of going with the master plan having this extra land. It's a -- it's tort .>f a planner's dream come true because usually, the extra land, we're always fighting the space issue, trying to cram six pounds of nails in a five-pound sack. And this -- certainly, we had what we felt was a really good plan and when you're given this extra land, it makes for a really nice community that is -- it was an especially stimulating design problem to have the extra room to accomplish a more gracious feel. it allows us -- it allowed us to incorporate several features some of which i already mentioned. ' The first off, and I'll say it again, and that's that density, down to 1.59 or, roughly, 1.6, down from 2.52. if you want to look at a rule of thumb throughout this county, tkrcuqhou~ =!or,da,. you ran ~ook at gross dwelling ~:nits per acre. You''~ find three is generally what the norm is. We're well below that, and especially more so with this additional land. It allowed us ro take the main amenity pods and separate them out. They're in the purple here. And you can see how the main amenity pods are separated out and it puts a larger percentage of the homes into a five-minute walk radius of these -- more evenly distributing these recreational amenities. As I mentioned, it allows us to add that fourth golf course which we didn't have room for before. That puts a lot more of the varied housing types on an amenity of a lake or a golf or a multiple amenity lake and golf. , With the extra land, we were able to create a whole lot more visual windows. These are -- as you drive through the community, nothing is worse than creating a community, and as you drive through, all you see, because everybody is seeking to -- to mine every lineal foot of golf fairway or open space that they have, you never get a chance to see it. You never get the chance to feel it as you drive through the community. So, we got these wide vistas that you can see along the road. i think the Fiddler's Creek vista is thousands of more feet along. ~nd, as you can see, as the boulevard goes around, we're able to open up and close the view with housing, open space; housing, open space. We -- with all the additional lakes, there's an environmental advantage. I think we've all seen that the -- the echotone or the fringe of the edge of lakes, especially in the littoral zones, is very valuable from the standpoint of aesthetics and from the standpoint cf migratory, wading birds, Dther wildlife, agricultural on the edge, and again able to amenitize more of the housing units. By having the extra room, if you notice in many places, our main collector road is moved to the outside of the project. We didn't l~ave ~o ,/ouole load it ever'y-~here. We were able to make it. We didn'- have %o fight for that extra little bit of space. By moving it to the outside, we use it to buffer along 41 and some .~f the other areas. We were also able to ensure that all the neighborhoods are completely, whac we call discrete neighborhoods. A neighborhood isn't Page, 32 February 5, 1998 a neighborhood if it's pushed up next to another neighborhood. A neiqhborhood is a neighborhood because it has its own sort of ~eographic spacial entity. And we were able to keep all of the neighborhoods totally separated. Another thing that we were able to do with this additional land is the creation of additional neighborhood parks that are scattered throughout the area, again putting more people within walking distance of the neighborhood parks. And I just want to address the collector boulevard. It can't say enough about that in the design. What it does, it acts as a spine also; by having this collector boulevard, acts as a spine for pedestrian movement system. And the pedestrian movement system enhances the linkage between the various land uses. it also acts as a visual guidepost, it's miles across here and · ~'ou -- ! always use the "Fred and Sadie" story about Fred and Sadie have never been here and it's a Saturday night and they're playing canasta with their friends. How in the world do we get out of here? We don't want to create a maze. So, with the -- the collector road system, you're always able to immediately identify and, you know, no matter ~which way you go, you'll come to an exit off of the property. It's also -- it establishes a hierarchy of roads. You know that this road is the main one and the neighborhood roads are secondary. It also allows convenient access to every one of the without traffic through it. neighborhoods I'd like to close, again, saying that this is a condition that we don't often get as planners and it's most enjoyable. We're always up against that space limitation and -- or we feel we certainly had a good plan, with this additional acreage of 1,385 to refit the master plan was certainly pleasant and I think the master plan was the result. ' Thank you so much for your attention. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. MR. VARNADOE: Mr. Chairman, if I could, I'd like to put Michael's resume in the record, and I've got one for everybody if you'd like to look at it. 'f anyone has any questions on either the water management system or the environmental aspects, as I said, I have Steve Means and Stuart Miller here to address those. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any cruestions from the summa~f ~.!r. us? ' Varnadoe ~ave There doesn't seem to be, Mr. Varnadoe. MR. VARNADOE: If not, there are certain matters i'd like to put on the -- make a part of the record, and most cf these './ou're already famii~ar with. One is the Collier County commercial study that Fraser and ~.~oh!ke did :n conjunction with the EAR process. One of the questions DCA had, whether it was -- whether it was sufficient nonresidential; i.e., commercial, to support the project. And as you know, Mr. Mohlke did a thorough study of particularly the act~' ity centers and existing commercial. You were familiar with this Page 23 February 5, 1998 during the EAR process but I do want to get it on the record. Also, ~e made a submittal after the application ~hat was part o~ · ='our package and I want to get that in the record to DCA. A submittal · ..~as made and we had a letter in response to the work report that i want to make a part of the record. There's a copy of that for each of you in case you didn't have enough reading materials in the project. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Yeah, thanks. MR. VARNADOE: I'd like to close very quickly with a couple of comments abou~ the DCA work report. I think it's important to note that their objection was not that this amendment constituted urban sprawl, but that there wasn't s~fficient data and analysis to remove three of the indice they had 5nat could constitute urban sprawls. So, '..;hat %heir recommendation was, provide data analysis to show it doesn't trigger those three indices. And that's what Mr. Arnold has tried to do and what we're trying to do with Michael Redd's ~estimony and my comments and the record we're making. The DCA has adopted a Rule 9J-5.006, and it's 13 indices of urban sprawl. Most of those indices have more than one element. Some of them, I think, are fairly obtuse to the average reader. However, ~heir rule also makes it very, very clear that even if you did trigger one or more of these indices, it does not mean you constitute urban sprawl. You have to balance the various indicators in conjunction with the local situation. For example, one of the indicators is low density. Well, yeah, that is a low density project. That is what the community wants. That's what the market wan~s. We're proud of it. We don't think you ought to be putting a high density project in this part of the county. So, you have to look at it in the local situation. You just can°t read one of these indices and say automatically that constitutes urban sprawl. The second point I'd like to make is that the rule also provides ~hat if the local government has a comprehensive plan that's in compliance, like we do, the fact that a -- and this plan may have some indices of urban sprawl. if you're making an amendment to the plan, they can't find it not in compliance because of those preexisting indicators. The test has %o be, are you exacerbating the situation, are you making it worse? i would -- ! would tell you here, since we are not adding any new '~nits, 5he lands immediately adjacent ~o uhe existing property, we have higher densities and more expanse uses further outside the urban area. i would submi~ ~o you this cannot constitute urban sprawl. The -- ~n summary, i think staff report and the ~esuimony you heard ~nd the data analysis that have been provided would be enough to uonvince DCA and, I hope, you that this does not constitute urban sprawl and ~his project would be an amenity to the county. i'd like to reserve the opportunity to rebut any issues or answer any questions that come up from other speakers. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. We may very well have some questions Page 34 February 5, 1998 for you at the end. Refore we get into the public testimony on this petition, we're ~oing to take a ten-minute break. (A recess was had.) CHAI~,tkN DAVIS: i'll call the meeting back to order and invite anyone that would like to speak on the three petitions we're hearing simultaneously to the podium. I would remind you of the focus of our hearings today is on the additional lands in question and the petitions that surround it. Is there anybody here that would like to speak on any of the three petitions? Yes, ma'am. Please come forward to the microphone. MS. CUPPY: ! may be in the wrong section but ! think -- CHAI~.Ud~ DAVIS: We're talking about all three parts to the Fiddler's Creek today. if you could state your name for the record, ma'am? MS. CUPPY: Margaret Cuppy. THE COURT REPORTER: Could you spell your las~ n~ne, ma'am? o please, MS. CUPPY: C-u-p-p-y. I'm only talking about five acres, but I'm glad to be up here. I live on 1051 Auto Ranch Road and it's below Henderson Creek, below West Wind on the right. In fact, a mile below -- it used to be the big farmland there. Can you see it on the map? It's a little road It's about a mile and a quarter long. ' CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I think most of us are familiar with it. MS. CUPPY: But we have all our habitat now. And I came -- I was born and raised in northwest Florida in 1915. I'm going to have to be careful It's nineteen hundred and if I live long enough. ' -- But, listen, when I came over from Miami -- I went to work and I worked in Miami -- I moved to Goodland and I had bought a place secause I had been fishing there since 1949, and then it got a little rough for me. in 1960 I bought this little five acres out here. I looked at it and then i bought it in '65 and it wasn't nothing. You know, it had been a sawmill out there, but it's next to the last five acres on that street, that road, and then there's salt water. There's salt lands when you leave there. But we have a well water and we have the best water you ever saw ~ust after five more acres. Percy was going to put a water plant on the five acres that was next to me. Rut what I'm trying to say is I'm too old to be moving now. And i don't, want to be incorporated because i don't have any money to pay taxes with. And it's only five acres to me, but it's more to me than all these thousands of acres these people are talking about. .~d i don't want ~o be incorporated, i just want to stay in Collier County out in the -- in the woods. There's a hammock right behind me, right of the map of the Marco River nearly. One mile from the corner of my corner onto Road 92, if Page 35 February 5, 1998 you go through the back road, Kersey (phonetic) Road. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Ma'am, there's -- there's nothing to do with the petitions before us today that will -- MS. CUPPY: But it said -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: -- change -- MS. CUPPY: -- you know, in my letter -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: -- your situation. MS. CUPPY: -- that -- yeah. Well, I just wanted to know. I don't want to be pushed out of them little woods out there, and I got 5o think about the taxes, %oo. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Certainly. MS. CUPPY: I think maybe one day that's going to be Marco island, maybe. I'm not going to live to see it, I'm sure, bua thank 5'ou for 'four ~ime an~;ay. CHAI~4A34 DAVIS: Thank you for coming. Yes, sir. MR. CUPPY: I'm Jim Cuppy. I let her get up here first because ~.~suaily she'll wear you out talking. Now, I know what I -- what I've got to say. I understood that it was going to vote on whether to incorporate that town or not. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: No, sir. COMMISSIONER OATES: No. COMMISSIONER BRUET: No. MR. CUPPY: Well, that's what I wanted. I don't want that CHAIRMAN DAVIS: No. ' COMMISSIONER OATES: No. MR. CUPPY: Absolutely not. Thirty years I've been building that place by hand and I don't want to -- I'm satisfied with East Naples i just don't want to be moved. ' CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yes, sir. Mr. Guggenheim? MR. GUGGENHEIM: Good morning. For the record, David Guggenheim, president, CEO of The Conservancy of Southwest Florida. I'm speaking Go you on behalf of our 5,300 members and 675 volunteers. The Conservancy does not object to the proposed growth management proposal that would allow an amendment to Fiddler's Creek PUD-DRI. Although we have serious concerns about urban type development of land ou[side the urban boundary, this proposal has compelling environmental benefits and other factors distinguishing it from other ~o[ent:ai PUD's outside ~he urban boundary. First and foremost, ~he Conservancy is now satisfied that Fiddler's Creek is unique and does not represent a precedent senzing --zringemen[ of the urban boundary or urban sprawl. Our position statement, which you do have now -- CF~i.RMAN DAVIS: Yes. We all have copies. :.fR. GUGGENHEIM: -- lists zen distinguishing factors of this proposed project, including the fac~ that the proposed addition is within boundaries of the Collier County water-sewer district with such services available currently and the fact that density is spread over a larger existing area, or I should say, existing density is spread Page 3 6 over a larger area. February 5, 1998 in addition, as you heard, Fiddler's Creek kas offered to give ~eveiopment rights to an environmentally significant area known as the peninsula, which extends into Rookery Bay preserve area and they would place those 63 acres into a permanent conservation easement. This is a significant concession and a win for the environment. While we're satisfied that this project is indeed a unique case, the fact remains that Collier County is experiencing tremendous growth along and outside of the urban boundary. it is regrettable that the county does not have a Growth Management Plan and -- and Land Development Code amendments in place now regarding criteria for PUD's outside the urban boundary. The County Commissioners directed staff to work with the '3ons~rvancy to develop such criteria following the '~in Eagles hearings. We look forward %~ working closely with county staff to ge~ [hose criteria hammered ou~. Given the growth pressures facing the county, we believe ~hat such criteria are nothing less than critical. 5u~, again, the Conservancy does not object ~o the proposed amendment before you here. Thank you. CO~MISSIONER BRUET: Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: We look forward to those criteria that you speak about also. Additional speakers? MS. HATTEN: Hi. My name is Charlotte Hatten. I reside at 100 Isle of Saint Thomas Street. It's in Port-au-Prince mobile home subdivision. A lot of things I'm going to try to read because I'm not a speaker because it very well does pertain to Fiddler's Creek. And, also, Z would like to start out with Z am talking for ~he residents of Por~-au-Prince, which are -- we presented a petition of 167 people, signatures against this development when it first began. ~ue ~o the fact of %he closures of pertinent canals in our area and each of our homes are on ~hese canals, and we know it's not a ~hing of wonderment, but after I read this you'll ge~ a better idea ~hat eventually we will be flooded from our homes _ am -- firs~ of ail, i'm totally against the rezoning of rural agriculture to PUD; against PUD-84-76 against DOA-S73 against CP-973. ' Community deveiopmen~ and environmental services, ~his is to show ~umuia[ive impact and why we need the EIS s~udy, this is to advise · Iou -- i'm sorry. I have a ~errible headache. CHAI~3%N DAVIS: Take your ~ime. >~S. HATTEN: This is to advise you that because i own property '...'i[hin 300 feet of Fiddler Creek boundary actually ~t s much ~ess ~kan 200 feet. -- ?ke ~op of the bank of what once was a canal is 50 feet to Fiddler's Creek property because of the riprap along the borders of %he Fiddler Creek property and the filling in of the wetlands, the closure of the 951 south canal that the Planning Board, Collier County Page 37 2 February 5, 1998 Commission and Development of Environmental Services endorse, my property is inundated with canal water. The canal banks in Port-au-Prince mobile home subdivision are eroding and falling into what once was a canal with tidal fluctuation. The county engineers, Hole and Montes engineers, determined canal water would release at 1.5 elevation. Fiddler's Creek control is set a~ %wo. The water is not doing so and is staying at high levels of 2.50 %o three fifteen and causing major erosion of land. Seawalls are having to be filled in as they are undermined and trees on property are falling into the canals. The waterways are stagnant, no oxygen, and polluted with high levels of chole form of bacteria creating a heai[h hazard, landlocking our community into an environment of ~;oil'dtion and an unacceptable condition. We, ~ke people of Por%-au-Prince, had clean tidal waterways, protected salt water fish, a spawning area teaming with wildlife of all species. Now i5 is gone forever. is this the course Collier County development and environmental planners wish, for other citizens to give away more vulnerable land? Collier County government will not undo or accept blame for what has been done to us. Today I am asking you to consider Fiddler's Creek petition as a continuation of more environmental destruction, pushing native fur bearing animals into the wetlands, a habitat not suited for all animals. Also the possible harm to property of other people as Fiddler Creek has shown no regard for our property in Port-au-Prince. Want to hear the worst part of this story? These problems that I'm telling you about now exist now. Fiddler's Creek have not even backfilled the canals that 5his planning board rezoned in July of 1996, which it's under our belief that this is on the 951, which they do no[ even include Port-au-Prince on their map to be their commercial par~ of the area to be developed. Are these possibly -- are there possibly more people's property to be damaged near the farmland? I know the animals, deer, hog, bear, birds and many wildlife will be driven away. Ruthless developers are not living up to their promises. Please do nc% recommend [his farmland to be rezoned. No 5o the same devei©pers who have trodden on the rights of homeowners and have no intention of correcting the problems created to [heir neighbors. Un~il they respect and correct the harm their development presents 5o our park, how can anyone believe their concerns for people's property, much less the environment? Vote no ~o Petition ~';umber 84-7(6), vote no 5o DOA-97-3 vote no to CPA ~- CP-97-3 no to urban sprawl. ' ' Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Additional speakers? >!S. DAYTON: Good morning. ~y name is Nancy Pav~on and i'm witk the Florida Wildlife Federation. ' ?he =lorida Wildlife Federation along with Collier County Audubon Page 38 February 5, 1998 Society did file objections to this Growth Management Plan amendment · ..;iuh DCA on several grounds. One of those grounds was that it's a special interest amendment. it's a market driven amendment rather than an amendment that's needed %o manage smartly and properly the growth in this community. it may be sprawl; it may not be sprawl. I remind you that we are increasing density on rural lands and there are implications to this particular amendment that expand beyond just this area. It sets a precedent. It may happen elsewhere. It's a chipping away of the integrity of our Growth Management Plan and its requirement to manage growth in our community smartly and properly. Also there are implications as this type of development creeps eastward, and you got a hint of it from the previous speaker, is that as ?:e see development come up closer and closer to the public lands, we're going to see potentially more and more conflicts because on public lands there are free roaming wildlife, thankfully, all their burning and other management practices that may conflict with those folks 5hat want to play golf or tennis or sit on their lanai. And I think that the community, the Planning Commission, the Collier County commission, the staff, has to begin to address these issues beyond the -- the urban boundary. And I would hope that the reason we haven't seen the criteria yet from staff is that they realize that there are far more complicated issues in dealing with rural development than just slapping some criteria on residential development. And I hope they're doing some land use planning and addressing these various issues of wildlife and burning and management that may be in conflict, wetlands issues and, therefore, I hope that the reason we haven't seen speedy -- speedy response to the direction of the commission is that this is a complicated issue. This is one that does require some additional thought, and it's not simply just developing several criteria on a paper for PUD's and where they might be. In summary, again, we're opposed to this amendment simply because it does set a precedent. It is undermining the integrity of our Growth Management Plan. It's market driven, it's special interests and i~'s not necessary. Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you, Miss Payton. Additional speakers? Seeing none, i'll close the public hearing. Any questions of -- from this board to the staff or the petitioner? COMMISSIONER OATES: Mr. Chairman, I would move we forward Petition CP-97-3 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation ~o adopt this amendment and transmit this petition to ~he Florida Department of Community Affairs. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: ~4otion of -- motion by Mr Oates seconded by ~4r. Bruet. · , is there a discussion on the text amendment to the Growth Page ] 9 2 February 5, 1998 Management Plan? All those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. That leaves the PUD and the -- PUD-84-7(6). CO~4ISSIONER PRIDDY: Mr. Chairman, I move that we recommend approval. COM}4ISSIONER BUDD: Second. MS. STUDENT: ~.~r. Chairman, I think Mr. Nino might have a few words on that. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: All right. There's a motion and second. As part of our discussion, we'd like to know what -- w~at you ?;ant to '~ell '~s, Mr. ~;ino. >~R. ';iNO: Obvicusiv -- Eon Nino -- i could be much briefer than ! normally would have been. i do have to get some things into the record, however. We reviewed the petition for rezoning pursuant to those criteria that we normally review petitions; namely, its consistency with all elements of the Growth Management Plan, not just the future land use element, that adequate infrastructure is indeed in place, that the timing of development is appropriate and that it's compatible. And, as you know, the Land Development Code provides for us making certain findings under PUP's and under rezones. They're all included in your packet and staff report. It's the opinion of staff that a vast preponderance of those findings support this rezoning action and the PUD amendment that is in your packet, again, we wish to assure you that those amendments are directly responsive to the presentations made to you and to the changes that are alleged and, most importantly, I think it's important ~o get into the record tha~ this petition does bring with it substantial area water management benefits that would not be achievable without this petition or without some additional costs on ~he part of the county that will now be borne by this developer. And those appear on Page 8 of the amendment package that provides for off-site water management improvements relative to Section 18 and 19, [Darticularly on the Tamiami Trail corridor. i do want to get into the record the issue of compatibility, and Z think it's stated in our paragraph on Page 7 at the bottom of the pa~e o[ our report, notwiths[anding the matter of consistency with the FLUE ~o 5he GMP, relationships of compatibility, the major criteria ~n support of rezoning actions is as follows. The fact remains that an urban subdivision is located to the east of the subject property which produces a condition whereby the property is surrounded on three sides with nonagricultural urban zoning districts, this fact coupled with the availability of public sewer and water utilities, support an action to rezone the property on the basis of compatibility with surrounding proposed and existing uses. The PUD has been reviewed by our legal staff and you'll note that Page 40 February 5, IR98 the -- the PUD is signed by Miss Student attesting to its legal sufficiency. CO~'~ISSIONER PRIDDY: Mr. Chairman, it was with an understanding of ail of that that I made my motion. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: So, the motion stands. CO~,~ISSIONER BUDD: Likewise, the second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: A recommendation of approval by Mr Priddy, seconded by Mr. Budd. Discussion? ~ll those in favor, signify by sayin~ aye. Opposed? (No response.~ CHAIRMAN DAVIS: I~ carries unanimously. Do you have cor~nents ,on she ZOA? MR. NINO: Yes, i do. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. MR. M~NO: ~gaiu, the -- this -- this petition does require an e~uencLment ~o the development order, which applies to Fiddler's Creek/Marco Shores, and you'll note that those amendments have to do essentially with changing the name of ~he pro~ect to what's currently bein~ used and to adopt -- basically to adopt the new master plan as under -- under a reference provision, so the amendments to the development order i~self are very minimal and ~hey're described in your staff report. And that, too, has been reviewed by legal, and Miss Student has signed off indicating its legal sufficiency. Thank you. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Mr. Chairman, I recommend that we forward DOA-~?-3 to the Board of County Cormmissioners with a recommendation of approval. COM/4ISSIONER OATES: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion of recommendation of approval by Mr Priddy, seconded by Mr. OaSes. · Discussion on that motion? All those in favor, signify by saying aye Opposed? · (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. MR. VARNADOE: And if you-all would like -- COM/4ISSIONER OATES: Mr. Varnadoe if you'd like all your ' StU~ _ . CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah. Hopefully, the books can be recycled. MR. VARNADOE: Pass them on to a higher authorizy. CH3~IRMAN DAVIS: Le~'s see. If that -- if I kept track here well, that brings us to PUD-82-33(1). We're pausing here momentarily while the room clears. Z'd ask all people here today tha~ may want to speak on this pe[i%ion, ~he PUD-82-33(1), to please stand, raise your right hand so zhe court reporter may swear you in. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Page 4 1 February 5, 1998 ~4r. ~.~ino? >!R. NINO: Yes. Ron ~;ino for the record. Let me hand out some letters that we received between the mailing of your packet and -- and today. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. ~4R. NINO: The petition that's before you asks you to amend the Wiggins Bay PUD, which is located on the southeast corner of Wiggins Pass Road and Vanderbilt Drive. Within the Wiggins Bay PUD at the immediate corner, there is a tract in the current PUD that is designated commercial. It's a three and a half acre parcel of land immediately on the corner that is, as I said, designated for commercial activity. And that activity can be any C-2 use which is permitted under the current Land Deveto~ment .Code, which would allow for sho~s a lot of retail t',~e faci%ity service faci: ~-~y, shopping center, that type of development. This petitioner is saying -- is asking you to approve converting that commercial designation to multiple family at the density than is allowed under the future land use elemen~ for actions involved in the conversion of zoning, which is inconsistent with the growth management -- with the future land use element of the Growth Management Plan. The site is three and a half acres; therefore, they're asking for 56 additional units. And the amendment that you have in your packet, the -- as a result of adding 56 units, of course, creates certain other changes to the Wiggins Bay PUD, and those have to do with the total number of units then authorized in the entire PUD and -- and the significance of the modification to the master plan. This petitioner, in addition to the 56 units, is asking that the height of these buildings be no higher than seven stories above the mean foot of elevation. And I think you'll find that that is the number one concern that -- than this petition causes, i think density is also important but you're going to find that the height of the building is probably the number one concern. And you also will recall that it '.vasn't very long ago that you reviewed a petition, the same petition for a 15-stool building on this site. And that petition was subsequently withdrawn. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. We were wondering if we were experiencing deja ~ru or not. ~4R. NIl;O: Actually, you dealt with it twice; once CHAIRMA2~ DAVIS: Yes. Right. COMMISSiOi~ER OATES: Right. ?IR. NINO: -- the 15 stories -- CHAIRI~AN DAVIS: Yeah. ~4R. NINO: -- and again an seven stories, and both of those petitions got withdra,~rn before they got to the board ,of commissioners. And £ believe you supported the seven-story oetinion than was last before you. We need to look at how compatible would the seven-story building be ~n ~his area. And as ~he staff repor~ indicates, immediately to nhe south and east of this project are buildings within the Wiggins Bay PUD that are called Princeton Place. They are -- they are Page~ ~ 2 February ~ five-story buildings. However, it's important to appreciate that ~he Wiggins · ..;as a unique type of PUD in the sense that i~ predetermined ~he maximum height of buildings that could be built on each and eve~; tract in ~he Wiggins Bay PUD. And Prince -- all of the buildings where Princeton Place ~s, ~hat are now five-story buildings, nevertheless could have built to a seven-foot story height had they chosen. And i -- those of you who are familiar with Wiggins Bay, Ghat area, and -- and know that it's now Tarpon Cove, way in the back of that project, but nonetheless part of the Wiggins Bay PUD, in that part of the Wiggins Bay PUD, they're authorized to build buildings of up ~o '3 s~ories in height. im~r~edia%eiy across ~he street frcm this project, '..;ithin the -- %bls Pelican isle -- Pelican isle is a series of three buildings, all of which are ten -- ten stories in height. And there's the Marina Bay Yacht Club ~r~ediately south of Pelican Isle development That is a ten-story building. So, you -- you have ten-story buildings immediately across the street from this, immediately contiguous to this. You have five-story buildings, and a little further away in the horizon you will have 13-story buildings. ' And across the street from this project, however, we have land that's undeveloped, and I think as the staff report points out, we don't know really what height of buildings we'll have there. The only thing we know for sure is there will be three units per acre, probably be a PUD and who knows what height might go there. What staff is advising -- furthermore, given the relationship of existing buildings and given the relationship of this tract to those existing buildings, it's apparent to us that the nearest building on this tract will be somewhere in the neighborhood of 200 feet from a building within -- an existing building within the Wiggins Bay PUD. And, again, as the staff report says, we don't think you can notice a variation of height of 20 feet within a horizontal distance of two -- 200 feet. We don't believe there's any blue view blockage as a resul~ of this, and, if anything, we would expect that by going [o seven stories, you know, versus something less than that while achieving the density, would result really in greater open space being achieved on this site with a higher building than with a shorter building, assuming that the density is one shat tends ~o drive the keigh~ in order to achieve it. However, in terms of -- in terms of compatibility on the matter of density, given the fact ~hat across the street, the land will be three units per acre. And we doubt the staff would be inclined and she board would be inclined, you would be inclined even if -- even if ~here were -- even if a portion of that land took on %he form of a multiple structure ~ype, we doubt that we would approve anything Greater %ban ten or 12 units per acre. And, as a matter of fact, you'll recall there have been a number of PUP's recently where we realized, because so much of the land is -- Page 43 16G 2 February 5, 1998 is.sensitive, can't be built on, that we know the number of dwelling un~%s that are built, that are going to have to be a multiple response, in several conditions -- instances that I can think of, Cierra Meadows was one of them, we said, however, thou shall not exceed so many dwelling units on any development tract within that PUD so :hat we don't get anything that is terribly dense. it's staff's opinion that -- that we should not approve the 16-unit bonus but that we should -- we should approve or recommend to the county board a density bonus of 12 dwelling units per acre instead of '6 dwelling units per acre. So, what we're recommending is that you approve the application with the density limited to 12 dwelling units per acre or I believe ~hau produces 40 -- whatever it is. CO~ISSiONER OATES: Forty-two. [4R. [IINO: Forty-two dwelling units -- thank you, commissioner -- instead of 56 dwelling units, and that you -- and that you support the seven stories in height. Be happy to answer any questions. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Well, if you go from 56 to 42, do you knock a story or two off? MR. NINO: Well, you can either knock a story or two off or you can make the building even narrower. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Or -- or bigger units. HR. NINO: Well, yeah. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah. Of course. Any questions of staff? M]~. NINO: Ergo, more expensive. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Pay more taxes. >IR. FERNANDEZ: Good morning, commissioners. Michael Fernandez for the petitioner. As Ron stated, this is not the first time you've seen this penition. It's actually the third go-around. You'll recall that in %he '~irsu go-around, we were requesting the 56 units be allowed to be ~eveioped in a 15-story building. At that time we showed a couple of computer generated models that -- nhat show that it would actually be a kinder neighbor at 15 nhan it ~.~ould be at -- at ten stories, which is what s~aff had reco,~mended an 5hau time. Subsequent to that, the petition was withdrawn. The next go-around, we came back and what we showed you at that 'ime again was for the 56 units with staff support and we were requesting seven stories. .And staff had said ten s~ories was fine. .%~.d, again, you recommended, i think the second time unanimously for ~.he ~.roject. ' !.~ow we're coming before you with a slightly different modified Dian, bun it's sni!! essentially the 56 units' and seven stories. );ow, one of the criteria -- one of the issues thaT. came up at the last meeting was staff came back and said, we want you to live by -- insnead of the standards than are already incorporated in the PUD, we'd like you to live by slightly more restrictive s~andards of the RMF-!6 zoning district. Page 44 1998 So, when we came before you in this -- in this petition, we went ahead ,and incorporated by reference that we would live up to those more restrictive P~F-!6 designations. And as far as we knew when we submitted this petition, we had staff support for the entire package. It was only at the last moment %hat we were notified that staff had had a change of -- of direction and from the two previous meetings and now come back and said, we would like you to have less units. And those units would take the project from 56 down to 52. When we talk about those units, what we're talking about is compatibility. And now staff has come back and said building height's compatible, you know, the -- all of the other issues; setbacks, landscaping, you know, lighting, all the other issues are compatible. So, the only ~hing that we can look at that is different between %he f6 units and the 42 units, because essentially it can be the exact same Building depending on the size of the units, is the number of cars %hat 42 units will generate versus 56. And I would submit to you that's a fairly insignificant n~unber especially when you compare it to what we can put on the property today, which is commercial development. Commercial development will generate a -- many times over the number of trips that will be generated by the 56 units that are being proposed. We -- as we've gone through this process, and this is the third time again, we've been working with our neighbors and we've had less letters of objection this time than we've had in the past. And we are confident that between now and our meeting with the Board of County Commissioners that we'll even be able to get a few letters of support and that the number of objecters is going to be reduced significantly. if you'll look at the letters and the text that they've submitted, their basic concern, their most basic concern that runs throughout those, is traffic generation. They're concerned that the 56 units are -- is going to actually create additional traffic. And, yes, i~'s going to create more traffic than the current undeveloped parcel, but it is a small fraction of what the commercial development on the site, which is approved for shopping center type uses, convenience stores, gas stations and the like, would generate. And one of the things that has swayed reviewers in ~he past, both staff, the residents and yourselves, I believe, is our site plan, in that the views of the existing buildings are away from our site. Our buildings are actually to the rear of their -- of their project. i'm going to pass out the site plan that we have, also with a -- a smaller colored version that shows the relationship between cur two buildings and the larger Princeton Place buildings. You'll note that the -- our two buildings are smaller in =oonpr~nt and they're located perpendicular to the larger Princeton Place ~ui!dings, which are the dark buildings that are shown, so than we're -- and the access to those units, the existing Princeton Place units, are to the back. That's their balcony areas, their entry doors and ~heir kitchen overlooks. - But their main focus is out toward the Cocohatchee River and the Page 45 16G 2_ February 5, 1998 environmentally sensitive areas that were part of the original PUD. Our views are directed away from that area over toward the bridge across ~he county park and to open water. So, it just works out very nicely that we can propose a site plan that has minimal impact to anybody's views. And, of course, if we were building a commercial deveicpment, you can imagine that the impacts of a commercial develcDment, both use-wise, noise-wise, traffic-wise are all going to be substantially greater, and staff is in agreement with ~hat. So, the only issue that we are in disagreement with staff is the density. And, again, let's take a look. The only thing that they've shown you is that the adjacent -- what we're looking at is net density. And our tract is three and a half acres. "t's part of a larger PUD. " ?he tracts -- i was told by staff that the tract the Princeton's -- Princeton Place is located at, actually nets out to over 16 units an acre, also told by the -- our client, who is the Power Corp. that is also involved with WCi in the development of the parcels further inland. They're developing 350 units over a net acreage of twelve and a half acres or 26 units per acre. So, if you look at all the different tracts in that immediate area, we're very compatible with them. If you look to the west and you look at the Pelican Isle developments, those are at 16 units per acre, again, looking at net densities. So, you know, our site, looking at net densities, 16 units per acre, the overall PUD now will go up from 4.67 to 5.05. So, we're looking at a very small increase in the net density of the overall development and very much compatible with what will be developed most likely across the way. Although they're talking about three units an acre, we're talking here the difference of going up from 4.7 -- six seven to 5.05. Now, if you look at the site plan again, you'll also note that there's a significant amount of open space on cur site. We've got over -- although we have already taken care of our open space and water management -- water management considerations off-site, it's being handled within the other areas of the PUD. Our open space and water management already is handled. We're still going to have over 50 percent green area on our site. You also notice that we've made a commitment that along our western boundary, the boundary that is closest ~o the units, that we";e -- are agreeable to retaining the existing trees and vegetation in %ha~ area, which will give us a mature buffer which will enhance beyond that. That will also give us a break between what essentiai!v Ls [he parking areas of Princeton Place. - With that, i'll be happy to answer any of your questions but i'll hope you'll, as you have in the past, support this particular peEi~ion. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Questions of the petitioner? ?hank you. Additional speakers on this petition today? I looked back here because ! recall uhree of you standing and being sworn and you've been Page 46 February 5, 1998 sitting here patiently all day. MR. ORME: Enjoyed every minute of it. CHAIRMA/~ DAVIS: We try to put on a good show, sir. if you could state your name for the record? MR. ORME: Commissioners, thank you for the opportunity to speak. ~.Iy name is Bill Orme, O-r-m-e.~ I live at 320 Horsecreek Drive, Unit ~01, which is Building 2 of the so-called Princeton Place kuiidings. I'd like to make three points: One, is respect to density and perhaps some ambiguity as I read what is proposed; second, the question of height of the buildings and it's -- third is the impact on traffic. ' First on the density, if i read, and I'm not a ia'~!er, but it says A, building, parentheses, S, close parentheses. i'm not sure whau %hat would actually authorize the developers to put in. The written proposal in the diagram suggests two buildings. I would like, if it would be possible, for the commissioners to clarify so that it would be no more than two buildings, which I understand is the intent, so it would be no possibility of anything beyond that going up. Second, speaking to height, it was described as, you know, not being very close. It's 200 feet away. Let me remind you that that's less than two-thirds the length of a football field which, if you watch a game, isn't very far from one end to the other. The other buildings in the area that are -- what was the word used, immediately next. They are, as.far as we're concerned, you can see on the horizon, Pelican Isle, and the building on Vanderbilt Drive. None of those buildings are anywhere close enough to anything within our gates, let alone the Princeton Place units, to form any obstruction of blocking of view, completely unlike buildings which will be 200 feet away from you. They said this is to the rear of our building. My -- all our front doors and all our walkways, as we come in and out of ~hose -- our buildings now, will be looking at those buildings. All of our guests and visitors will be looking at those buildings. 7t would seem to me that, even though I'm told by the staff that %he buildings in place now could well have been built to seven stories, someone used good judgments, we think and limited them to five. ' We would hope ~he board, the commission, would also suggest that %he developers use the same good judgment and limit it to five so 5hey're not 200 feet away and two stories above us. The uhird is the impact on traffic. Horsecreek Drive is fine, but i['s -- you know, it's -- it's a lane. It has no -- no sidewalks and yeu it's -- with the present density, it is used by most of us for walking, for bicycling, for rollerblading, for whatever. And what's going to happen with these two buildings, assuming they will be limited to the units and place? The impact on that traffic will be 60, six zero, percent increase. That's fairly dramatic where I come from, so I just hope that you Page 47 February 5, 1998 will give some consideration to these real life problems that those of us who live there and enjoy it there will call to your attention. ~d I just -- a quick personal note, without going on, i've done, like many of us have, a share of pro bono public service and I can appreciate the time and brick pats that you people all get for doing a good job for the -- and as neighbors of all of ours. Thanks for doing it. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you for your kind words. Additional speakers? CO~ISSIONER BRUET: Can I ask him another question? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: While he's coming up, Mr. Fernandez, there were two buildings is what we're talking about. Just answer the ~entleman's question. MR. FERNANDEZ: 'Yes. The -- our client is willing to commit tha~ si~e plan as being ceneraiiy consistent with whac we'll submit as far as the SDP. - CHAIR/~AN DAVIS: Okay. Thank'you. Yes, sir. MR. TAVERNA: My name is Dom -- Dominic Taverna. That's T-a-v-e-r-n-a. I'm in the same building with Bill, who spoke before me. And on the height limitations, I have three. I thought the height limitations -- well, we're a five-story area. I tho~%ght that this would be consistent with what is in the area right now. And I've been living there since the -- all the buildings of Princeton Place weren't there when I come in, and as the buildings were proceeding, I think that the height limitations of the -- the original PUD shows that we had at that time was Port Side, which was never constructed. Now we've got the Aruba going up, which is away from the siting, if you want us to sunset and so forth. So, that height limitations of five stories would be, as Ron suggested, I think the thing that would keep everybody happy in the area. The density, I don't see any problem with that, but i do have one more question, and that's in the -- we have a security wall there now, and i don't -- and the traffic coming in there and entering into the new development, what will happen when we cut that driveway zhrough? Will that security wall be brought around to the -- ~hrough the -- around the buildings so tha~ it will give us the same security we have now? That is the other question that ! have. And outside of ~hat, ~hink zhat this is a fine development. I have no objection against in. As long as it's a -- I'd prefer the five story, ~ike most of us wouid, and the security ~ha~ we need. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Well -- MR. TAVERNA: The wall is a good thing, and i don't think we would like to see a fence, because, as I say, I went in early. zhink you gentlemen know they were having problems on the site in the -- in zhe beginning, and most of us had to wait three years to have the wall finished because the previous developer walked away and didn't complete the wall. Page 48 Februa~t 5, 1998 So, we had to put our pennies together to complete the wall, ,,n_c.. we did about three years ago. And now we don't want to lose ?hank you very much. --' CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. And we'll see if we can get the wall ques%ion answered for you. :4R. FERNANDEZ: Yeah. There's -- we're going to make a singular opening into that wall system, but it will be a continued -- we'll keep the continuation of it. And we'll actually have our own little guard area at our entel as noted in our site plan so that there won't be any loss of security that they currently enjoy. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Okay. Thank you. Yes, sir, if you want to come on up? >IR. DAVIES: ~y name is Roger Davies, D-a-v-i-e-s. 't'$ usually Du~ a~ Davis but I like to stick the E in there. 2 have more or less the same objections that the other people had. The increased traffic into our gate, the traffic down Horsecreek Drive will be increased. At this time of the year, there are many people walking. That's only a two-lane street without sidewalks. You have to dodge in and out of pedestrians right now. Would there be any possibility of getting an entrance into that corner off of Wiggins Pass Road so we do not have the additional traffic coming down Horsecreek Drive? I don't know whether that's -- COMMISSIONER OATES: No, not traffic. I -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: County staff can respond to that, I -- COMMISSIONER BRUET: It goes along with my question. ~R. NINO: The -- the current PUD does not provide for any access with Wiggins Pass Road or Vanderbilt Drive. That's not ~o say that the PUD could not be amended to establish an access on Wiggins Pass Road. COM/~ISSIONER WRAGE: Under the old commercial wasn't there an access onto that site? ' ~4R. NINO: No, there wasn't. COMMISSIONER WRAGE: Actually, as a commercial access, they would have suill had to wen~ out on Horsecreek Drive. ~.~R. NINO: Commercial would have had to would have had to have surv~.;ed on interior access, but I suspect that if t3~ey were serious abou~ commercial, that they'd been at us with an amendment to the PUD to create an access onto Wiggins Pass Road and you would approve it. CO~.~ISSIONER ?/RAGE: Because i think we ~aiked asout ~ha~ !as~ time, as i recall. ~4R. NINO: We did. Okay. ~.IR. DAVIES: Currently, from the corner of Vanderbilt and Wiggins Pass, 'here's a cut about a hundred feet which obvious!v at one time was ~eant >!R. i.;INO: That was through the old sales trailer which was not -- nc.~ a legal -- not a legal driveway. :,!R. DAVIES: But, anyhow, ~hat would be much more acceptable if an access was given off of Wiggins Pass Road specifically.for that little development that they want to put in there. We'd ~ust have too Page 49 February 5, 1998 much traffic on that street as it is. The views -- and, again, this was what Fernandez sent me. We also look out the front. When I sit in my kitchen and eat breakfast every morning, I look out the front of my window there and I'm going ~o be very close to this property. We're in Building 2 And you can see where this is going to be. ' At the entrance up here at Wiggins Pass Road and Horseshoe -- or Horsecreek Drive, there was 56 units put in there and four buildings. And those are crammed in there. We don't need another development like tha% on the corner over here. It's just, I think, the height, the safety and what view is going to be blocked by the additional height in the buildings would create. Thank you. CHAi.~/ DAVIS: Thank you. Mr. Davies, a few cf us, - guess, Welsh ancestors drop ~he E but ~ha~'s okay, too. MR. FERNANDEZ: Commissioner, I'd like to clarify the ~ssue of %he access point. - In our original petition, we did have our access coming off, directly off Wiggins. Staff recommendation was that we delete that access and that our access be granted only internally. It's something that we don't mind having but it's something that the -- the staff asked us to provide for. If this site were developed as commercial, one of the issues that comes up is, you know, access, and we would also ask at that time if that were to be the case, of course, to have access directly off, but we would also enjoy access from internal, from the development as of right now if we were to develop that as commercial. COMMISSIONER OATES: So, you in fact would prefer access from Wiggins Pass? MR. FERNANDEZ: We're -- either way. Either from one side or the other, you know, as long as we have pedestrian access through the development, which we already enjoy. COMMISSIONER OATES: in other words either from Vanderbilt or Wiggins Pass? ' MR. FERNANDEZ: Right. Now, what we're looking at is an addi5ional 56 units. Right now there's about 290 uni%s that enjoy access off tha% road, so we're talking about a 19 percent increase in -- in units, which I would assume relate %o traffic directly. COMMISSIOn;ER OATES: Miss Student, i have a question. As part of ~his PUD, can we recommend that access be gotten =rom Wiggins Pass Road or do we have to readvertise and go through all ~ha~? MS. STUDENT: No. i think that's well within your ability COMMISSIONER OATES: Okay. >~S. STUDENT: -- to do that as part of this procedure. COP[MISSIONER OATES: Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Ail right. Additional speakers on this subject on this petition? Seeing none, i'll close the public hearing. Page : 0 ~eb=uar,2" 5, 29~8 CO~"~ISSZO~R OA~S: Mr. Chairman, Z ~ould mo~e we recommend approval of Petition PUD-82-33(3) (sic) with the stipulations, one, %hat entrance be gotten from Wiggins Pass Road and that, number two, ~ke number of units be 56 dwelling units. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion -- motion of a recommendation of approval by Mr. Oates, seconded by Mr. Bruet. So, it includes the 56 units but the stipulation of an access -- COMMISSIONER OATES: From Wiggins Pass. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: -- which deals with the traffic -- the traffic issue that's been discussed here. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Would that stipulation be based that it will be allowable to have an access' from Vander ~- from Wiggins Pass if she -- you know,, there might be a situation where they won't -- where they won't want the access there for some reason for ~~affic control. ~~ COMMISSIONER RRUET: As an option, Ed, or -- COMMISSIONER PEDONE: Yeah. Another -- COMMISSIONER OATES: Well I thought that Michael said that they were -- ' CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah. COMMISSIONER OATES: -- willing to go along with that and probably would even prefer that. in __COMMISSIONER BRUET: If you make it an option, then he could go COMMISSIONER DAVIS: Yeah. COMI4ISSIONER OATES: Yeah. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: What I'm saying is, will the county or the state -- I don't know. Is that a state road? COMMISSIONER OATES: No, it isn't. COMMISSIONER BRUET: COMMISSIONER PEDONE: allow it. COMMISSIONER BRUET: COMMISSIONER OATES: No, a county. That the county -- that the county would Yeah. It would be subject to -- Subject, obviously, to approval. COMMISSIONER BRUET: -- subject to approval, yes. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah. i can support that motion, i -- I guess without that extra -- you know, the access that way, then I think staff -- the 42 units that staff came up with makes more sense, but r guess that's a moot point at this time. Any other discussion? Ail those in favor, signify by saying aye Opposed? ' (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. >!R. NINO: Can you clarify what it was you ~ust adopted so i can do my meticulous summary? COMMISSIONER OATES: You tell us about how many units, you know. Remember, you got us involved in units? :-~R. NINO: You're going to do 56. Page 5 1 Februa~f 5, 1998 COM~4ISSIONER OATES: Right. :,IR. NINO: is access from both streets -- iOMMISSIONER BRUET: No. One. MR. NINO: -- or one? COM/~ISSIONER PEDONE: One or the other as an option. MR. NINO: One or the other? COM}4ISSIONER PEDONE: And it's an option. COMMISSIONER OATES: As an option. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Petition PUD-90-36(1). Mr. Nino, and I'd ask ail :hose -- before we swear people in, yes, sir? MR. ORME: A point of information. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Could you -- you'll need to come up to the microphone so that your comments -- question will be on the record. HR OR/',~E: :.Iy commen~ ;- ; · ' -= ust a question. Bill Orme, O-r-m-e. On what you just passed, does that eliminate Horsecreek Drive as an entrance and egress to that -- that property, to be clear? COMMISSIONER OATES: At their option. At the developer's option. MR. ORME: Oh, no. property? COMMISSIONER OATES: the intent. COMMISSIONER BRUET: You mean they can still go through our They can't do both, at least that was not Right. One or the other. MR. ORME: I thought you said Vanderbilt Drive or Wiggins Pass Road -- COMMISSIONER OATES: Yeah, as an option. MR. ORME: -- neither of which is Horsecreek Drive. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: That's right. That is correct, sir. MR. ORME: So, you're not allowing it to be Horsecreek Drive; correct? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: That's the recommendation we've made to the Board of County Commissioners. They very soon will have the ultimate approval on it. MR. ORME: Okay. But it's either Wiggins Pass or Vanderbilt. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Uh-huh. >~. ORME: Thank you. CHAIFuMA2~ DAVIS: Thank you. With that, where was i -- oh, we're going to swear in the -- swear in everyone that wants ~o speak on this pezition. Zf you'd please raise your right hand so that you may be sworn by zke court reporter. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Mr. Nino? MR. NiNO: it's Ron ~';ino for the record. ?he amendment to -- this is a -- this is a request for amending the £addlebrook Village PUD. Again, it comes to you as a result of the sunsetting provisions, which i would reiterate, this applies to those PUD's where no development has occurred within a period of five years or more. Page 52 This PUD, when it came to the board under that sunsetting prc'/:sion, however, was given a two-year extension. So, this Deti~ioner really didn't have to come before us at this point in time with a new PUD; however, they chose to do so because, i suspect, there were other issues that they wanted to address in the form of an amendment in any -- in any event, so what we're getting is a -- an updated PUD with, however, very minimal changes in it over the one that is currently in place. And the substantive changes to this PUD in addition -- in addition to changing the language to refer to current people like Planning Services and -- and Project Review Services and EAB, in terms of making the references current with today's refe:?ences in the Land Development Code, the -- the substantive changes here have t:~ do with ~ncrease -- reducing -he -- ~ ~ · ..... n.mum oor area for muitlo!e =amiiy units J .rcm 750 to 600 square feet. Additionally, when this PUD was first approved, the petitioner was required -- the owner was required to make the street into the PUD a public street back to -- if you look at your PUD master plan -- to make it a public street all the way back to Pine Crest Lane. That's the stipulation within this PUD. And, again, in the opinion of staff, it's -- it's unusual. We've -- but I don't know of any other PUD that has this kind of a requirement. But, nonetheless, it is a stipulation in the PUD and -- and they wish to have it removed because this is going to be a system of private streets in a gated community. Furthermore, I'm advised by the owner Of the land on either side of Pine Crest Lane that they intend to vacate that right of way and to develop that property -- they own both sides -- to develop it as a unified plan of development that would include the road. So, it would seem that in any event that that objective is certainly not achievable and we don't think it was really necessary and we certainly support a -- a PUD amendment which would eliminate than requirement. One of the other reasons which drove this amendment, the current plan, ac the time that it came through, was not in a position to idencify with any great accuracy those lands that woui! have to be preset-zed. And, of course, they goc much further aicng in their permitting process in terms of what the water management district would buy off on and, indeed, they are ready to go forward in the affordable housing project. You recall only recently that the affordable housing development agreemenc was approved by the County Board of Commissioners. This will be a project in which a hundred percent of the units -- a hundred -- 's it a hundred -- well, anyway, a good portion of the units wil~ be affordable housing. - And -- and, indeed, there is a site development plan in our office right now for the front part of this project, so ~his is a real project. And -- and the project ~hat's under review is an affordable housing project, and as a result of that investigation, they were able to define accurately the wetland areas and this map does zhau. So, Page 53 Februa~f 5, 1998 this is a much more accurate map in terms of its delineation of ~reserve areas versus development areas. There's nothing here that we find to be inconsistent with the Growth Managemen~ Plan. And we certainly recommend that you recommend approval of the PUD as amended. C~IRMAN DAVIS: Okay. ?etitioner's representative? :.IR. NADEAU: Mr. Chairman, commissioners, good morning, pleasure ~o be before you again. Dwight Nadeau from Mc~nly Engineering and Design representing the petitioner, Colonial Equities. Mr. Nino was very thorough in his presentation, i'll just let you know that the 33.8 acre project was given an affordable housing density bonus agreement by the Board of County Com~issioners on December 9 of !as~ year. That's been recorded ~n OR ~ook .... , ?age 2544 and on. ' -- ~, >!r. :;ino kas described how ~he plan has changed and, ac[ually, the preserve area is -- we've got some wetland preserve, which is ~o[aling six acres, and some upland preserve due to some listed species issues which totals approximately five acres. The proposed plan reduces the impacts to Collier County and South Florida jurisdictional wetlands by one acre. And I also was contacted by Mr. Fitzgerald and received a letter from the trustee of lands to the west asking that we remove the emergency access provision, which is right here at Pine Crest Lane, and that would allow him to provide for a unified plan of development. It's my understanding that Pine Cone Lane has already been vacated. So, on my own volition, I'll remove the emergency access from the PUD master plan. Beyond that, I could answer some questions for you. CHAi~fA/q DAVIS: Mr. Priddy. CO~MISSIONER PRIDDY: What listed species were you fortunate enough to have that resides on this five-acre tract? MR. NADEAU: Well, on the -- actually, the listed species were seen on the five-acre tract. They were seen in the -- some of ~he pine which remains in the melaleuca almost -- it's almost a moncculture, but i~ was ~he big cypress fox squirrel. They found no nests, but to satisfy Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, that five acres has been set aside for potential foraging of that listed species. CO:~4ISSiONER BRUET: He might be coming back He might come back. · CO:-E~iSSi©NER ?RIDDY: i think he's a~ my house but -- CHAiRMA~M DAVIS: Any other questions? Thank you. Anyone else to speak on this petition today? Seeing none, i close the public hearing. >~otion? CO~IiSSIONER BRUET: Mr. Chairman -- CHAI~4AN DAVIS: Oh, go ahead. Mr. Bruet. CO~ISSiONER BRUET: Seeing this amendment, there's nothing to change ~o proposed land use or increased density, i recommend we Page 54 February 5, 1995 approve Petition PUD-90-36(1) and forward it to the Board of Commissioners for final approval. COI~iSSIONER OATES: Second. CH~I~ DAVIS: Motion of reconunendation of approval by Mr. Bruet, seconded by Mr. Oates. Discussion? Ail chose in favor, signify by saying aye Opposed? ' (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: That carries unanimously. COMMISSIONER OATES: Dwight, if you'll pick up all your stuff. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: We're sure you can recycle those. PUD-90 dash -- oops. Excuse me. Turned the Dage Petition R-97-i0. ' i ask ail those here today that are going to testify on this petition to please stand, raise your right hand so that you may be sworn by the court reporter~ (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. Mr. Nino. MR. NINO: Yes. Ron Nino for the record. The petition that's before you seeks to rezone property currently zoned agricultural to the PS public use -- public service district. We call it a fire station because the petitioner is the fire district and the intended use is the fire station; however, we have you appreciate that the -- the PS district covers more than just fire stations and that, indeed, other uses that are consistent with the uses authorized in the public service district may be located on this property. Public use -- public uses are uses that are all allowed within the urban residential district; so, therefore, this petition, if approved, would be consistent with the future land use element to the Growth Management Plan. Again, we've reviewed the petition relative to standard rezoning criteria, and we think a preponderance of the criterion and, of course, the rezoning action. it's also important to appreciate that a fire station -- they applied as an essential service under the agricultural district and, quite frankly, I guess the position of staff, that we're really dealing with an essential service here, and the standard milestones or touchstones for telling you what's good or bad planning really fall by the wayside when you deal with an essential service, i mean, this is necessary for the public safety and health. CO~4ISSIONER OATES: You're not against fire stations, in other ~ords. MR. NINO: We're not agains~ fire stations. We don't have a problem with it. We think our staff report adequately makes a finding that -- that a fire station or a public use at this slte would not be injurious to any other property owner. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Which would include as you pointed out in your Page 55 February 5, 1998 staff report the 13 permitted uses under public use districts -- MR. NINO: Yes. E~I~43kN DAVIS: -- which is things like collection and transfer sites for resource recovery? - >~R. NINO: Yes. COM/~ISSIONER PRIDDY: A miniature fairground. ]'~. NINO: Essential service. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: But, in fact, this is for a fire station. COMI~ISSIONER BRUET: Yeah. Ron, this is for a fire station only? This is not another attempt at that training center? MR. NINO: I'm going to leave that question up to the petitioner to address. It's not a large site. . CH~.i?_MAN DAVIS: All right. Any other questions of staff~ >!r. Fernandez. · :.IR. FERNANDEZ: Good morning, commissioners. Michael Fernandez for the plaintiff. I'm going ~o incorporate it for the petitioner. This site is owned -- is under contract to be purchased by the North Naples Fire District. Its intended use -- and we can limit the -- the scope of the public service to a fire station and E~S and related uses. There is -- the site is just over four acres of which approximately only two are developable. The southern two acres are wetland in the truest sense of the word and we're not intending to touch those at all. So, it's a relatively small site. It's perfect. It's well situated to serve this community. It's consistent with the Growth Management Plan that showed there was a need for a fire station in the future in this particular area. In fact, it's -- if you look to the Growth Management Plan, the -- the dot that they put a fire station on is almost on this exact same piece of property. Just move it over a half a foot or so. So, we think it's compatible use with the adjacent neighbors and we ask for your support, but we -- we can limit it to a fire station EMS and associated related uses. ' CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah. Certainly, the administrative service facility. There's a lot of these things that would apply, but there -- some of them just seem a little strange. MR. FERNANDEZ: Yeah. We don't -- we don't need those and I m sure the commissioners would have a greater comfort, too, if we get rid cf, 'you know, transfer stations and so forth. JOMMISSIONER OATES: You don't want to run a child care center? CHAIRMAN DAVIS: But it also -- you talk about location. If Liv~ngsnon Road ever finally does get built, it's an ideal -- you know, certainly an ideal location. :~R. FERNANDEZ: Yeah, in is. It's extremely well situated. It was ':ke the number one choice for the fire department for this area. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any other questions of the petitioner? ?-~yone else to speak on this petition today? Seeing none, i'll close the public hearing. CO~'~ISSIONER PRIDDY: Mr. Chairman, I move that we approve Page 56 February 5, 1998 R-97-!0 and recommend for approval. CO~{MISSiONER WRAGE: Second. C~I~4AN DAVIS: Motion of recommendation of approval by Mr. Priddy, seconded by Mr. WraGe. That's -- that's with the understanding that the petitioner and staff are going to kind of refine the -- COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: Yeah, that we -- CHAIRMAN DAVIS: -- the uses between now and the Board of County Commissioners? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: -- that we won't have any miniature fairgrounds or -- COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: -- resource recovery facilities. COMMISSIONER BRUET: Administratively oriented. CF~i~j~ DAVIS: Yeah. i think the reasonable activity that you need for a fire station, certainly. With that, all those in favor, signify by saying aye. Opposed? (No response.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Carries unanimously. MR. CARDILLO: Thank you. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Thank you. That brings us to Item L, R-97-11. I'd ask all those left here today to stand, raise your right hand so that you may be sworn by the court reporter. (The witnesses were sworn by the court reporter.) CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Mr. Nino? MR. NINO: Yes. Ron Nino for the record. Well, I guess all of you with the exception perhaps of Commissioner Urbanik know what this is all about, and perhaps that commissioner knows what it's all about as well. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I wasn't here. MR. NINO: It's Twin Eagle -- pardon? COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: I wasn't here. MR. NINO: Weren't you here? I could have sworn you were. COMMISSIONER OATES: Don't you remember we had to Go ~o immokalee to mee[ and he didn't show up? MR. ~INO: Oh, I see. Well, you recall -- CO~{MISSIONER PRIDDY: Mr. Thomas was still filling this seat. MR. NINO: You recall it wasn't very long ago that ~his proper~y was rezoned from agricultural with a mobile home overlay ~o a planned unit development for a golf course residential community. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: They were Going to undo that. MR. NINO: And they were going to undo that, not at their -- not because ~hey're happy to do so but, I Guess, because they decided that f~'s no~ worth the legal battle that is attendant to that process. But, nevertheless, ~he petition that's before you would have you rezoning PUD which authorizes a -- a 275 unit -- housing unit Golf course type of community back to agricultural. And when you're doing ~hat, there really isn't a heck of a lot Page 57 February 5, 1998 you can say about it. HS. STUDENT: :4r. Chairman, if I might, this matter is in litigation and this is so I would, you know, just pretty much state it that that's the reason for it and, you know, limit -- limit comments on the record because it is -- say too much because it is in litigation. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Yeah, it strikes me that this is -- MS. STUDENT: That's why. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: This is something we can deal with pretty easily today, i don't see a vast number of people out here to speak against or, I guess, for the action that's contemplated here so -- MR. NINO: We've had no letters of objection. COMMISSIONER PEDONE: They might have when they put the pig farm there. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Representative of the petitioner, anything to add or anything you want to get on the record? :eR. ANDERSON: For the record, my name is Bruce Anderson on behalf of the petitioner. This petition was filed solely to moot out two lawsuits in which Collier County and my client are defendants. The relief requested in those lawsuits is to return the property to its agricultural zoning with a mobile home overlay, and they're going to get what they ask for. COMMISSIONER OATES: I have a -- anyway, I have a question, Bruce. MR. ANDERSON: Yes. COMMISSIONER OATES: That really doesn't relate to this exactly, but when you buy one of these five-acre tracts to build your house, are you going to own a little bit of the seventh hole and part of the fairway and some -- where the bears can run true and wherever? MR. FERNANDEZ: Yes, sir. Yes, sir. COM/4ISSIONER OATES: Thanks. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Any other -- any other people -- persons here today that would like to speak on this petition? Seeing none, I'll close the public hearing. Hotion? CO~4MISSIONER BRUET: :4r. Chairman, I recommend we approve Petition R-97-11 and forward it to the Board of Commissioners for approval. CO[~MISSIONER URBANIK: Second. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: Motion by Mr. Bruet to recommend approval to the BCC. seconded by Ms. Urbanik. Discussion? Al! those in favor, signify by saying aye. Carries unanimously. And, gentlemen, just a -- a personal observation. This is really ~oo bad. COMMISSIONER PRIDDY: i voted in favor of that although I was really against it. CHAIRMAN DAVIS: If there's no other business to come before this Page 58 February 5, 1998 board, we are adjourned. There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Chair at 11:40 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ~4ICHAEL A. DAVIS, Chairman TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING BY: Rose M. Witt, RPR PaGe 59 Courtly Government Productivity Commiltee Mectin~ Minute's Drcrmbcr 17, 1997, 9:30 A.I~I. ~lembers Presenl Ahsenl Jack McKenna x Barbara Berry x Mario Delgado x Edward Ferguson x Charles Getlcr x Robert Laird x Bill Neal x Edward Oft x Karl Otto x John Schoemer John Stockton x Bernard Weiss \Villiam Ebben St:iff Gary Vincent Guests Charles Sxvain l'resentntion hy Mr. Charles Swain Jack McKenna opened the meeting at 9:30 and introduced Mr. Charles W. Swain, Director of Internal Audit, Clerk of Courts. Mr. Swain explained the organizational structure anti ptu'posc of his office. Itc presented a written copy of his office's current year work plan and offered assistance to the Productivity Committee. The Committee felt Mr. Swain's oll'ice could be a great asset and welcomed his offer of assistance. St, l)con~ mittee UI)dales Jail Study - [gill Neal and Karl Otto have completed their meetings with 'l'l~e V Group and odter entities concerning the Integrative Corrections Strategic Development Plan. Their recommendation is to proceed with the construction ora new jail in Immokalee and integrate the Naples jail and Sheriff's facilities with the Main Campus Master Phm..,\ draft of their final findings is attached, which includes five recommendations. Adolfo Gonza[cz, the Director of OCPM will finalize the report and present it to the BCC. Hdman Resource follow-up - Ed Ferguson xvill provide the status at the JanuaD' 21, 1998 meeting . Misc. Corres: C~stant the / .... ' ~ lt,.:~: ~ Nac K S e ,, ' Cop;es lo: iiii I I II II IIIII II I IIII II I I III II ..... I I II I .'qheritT's Overtime - The subcommittee has completed all site visits and infom~ation gathering and will provide a draft of their final report by mid January 1998. ()hi lh,siness l'rcss Release Modification - l'he committee approved the proposed press release for committee vacancies, with modifications, that was dis~ribt,tcd at the i)cccmbcr 1997 meeting. Thc nmdifications added the length of term and residency requirements. Gary Vincent will F~, ..... : ' thc new press release to Sue Filson. Verbatim Recordings of BCC Meetings - John Stockton looked into using transcripi software for recording BCe meetings and found that the technology has not prolu to make that a viable option. He suggested that we use brief written mi~ules arid recordings as a record of the BeC meetings and eliminate the Court Reporter verbatim recordings. New Ih,siness Jack reminded the committee that his second term ,,vas expiring and a new chairman v,. , elected next meeting. Meeting ad.iourned 11:35 a.m. The next meeting will be on Wednesday .January 21st, at 9:30 a.m. in the County /,,d ministrator's Conference Room. 2 cc. Board of County Commissioners Office Robert Fernandez, County Administrator (~'ounty Govcrnmcn; I~rocluctivitv Committee Fchru:~ry 18, 1998, 9:30 A.M. Members Present Ahscn I (~ommissioncr Mae'Kit X Bill Ncal X Karl Otto X Marlo Dclgado X \Villiam Ebben X I~dward l:crguson X Julie Frccland X Charles Gorier X Robcrl Laird X Edxvard Ott X John Schocmcr X John 81ocklon X Bernard Weiss X M, isc. Corres: Date: ' Staff // /~ Gao' Vinccnt X Item~ /(.;. ~. Robert Fcmandcz X Copies To: Bill Ncal opened thc meeting at 9:30 A.M. and welcomed Comrrfissioncr Mae'Kit to tim Productivity Committee (PC). Ness' Business a. l)iscussion of Producti'vity Ordinance. b. Responsibility of Productivity Committee. c. Productivity Committee elections, tcm'~s, vacancies and attendance. Thc first three items on thc agenda under new business were discussed together. Thc i'C discussed their governing ordinance concerning attendance and terms of office. Thc ordinance states that a member's scat si'mil bc declared vacant if that member is absent for more than half ol'lhc commiltccs meetings during a Fiscal year. Commissioner Mae'Kit rcconln'lcmlcd changing the wording of the ordinance to say "may," rather than shall, in order to give thc I>C more flexibility for retaining valuable members of tile conlmiltec. Thc COlllmittcc also directed Gary Vincent to dcvclol') a form for tile members to fax to him before cvcD' meeting. 'File form will state whether or not the member will attend the meeting and thc reasons for not attending. The £onn ,,,,'ill also have space for a status report ifapplicable. Thc I'C also discussed thc wording in thc ordinance concerning tcnns &office. Commissioner Mae'Kit clarified the wording to mcan that a member may only serve 2 two-year terms on the PC. Thc 1'(' desired lo retain .lack McKcnna on thc committee because bc had been thc chairman for thc past 2 years and could provide continuity and be a valuable asset. Commissioner Mac'Kic suggested changing thc ordinance to allow a member of thc PC, wh~,~ Norris Hanc~k Constantine. clxfinn:m during his or her las! yc;w on tl~c commit~cc, to bc appointcd ;~s ('haimmn Emc ~ Thc Chaimmn l:.mcritus could provide i,~put lo tile PC but would have no voling power. The P(' discussed thc dil'ficully in meeting the deadline for recommending vacant position. Thc short lime I?amc docs m}t allow thc subcommittee to review thc applications, hltcrvicw thc applicants, ;llld make their fCCOllllilclid;itiOll ('ommissioncr Mac'Kic directed thc County Administrator to find :l solution to thc problcnl. c(! ). Bill Ncal introduced and wclcomcd Julie Frccland to the I'C. Julic talked ahout her education and experience in engineering. ti. Bob Fernandez. thc County Administrator, provided Iht I'C with a Iisi of projects that the BCC and he considered lo have priority. They arc: Overtime in Iht ShcrilTs l)cparlmct~l. ()vct~imc in EMS, OCPM review, DeR review, County Pay Plan AdjtlMlllCllls. thc transition to Marco Island incorporati{m, and thc I,amlfill. Mr. I:crmmdcz stated that hc had a list of issues l?om the Division Administrators that he would provide to the PC after hc puts them in priority order. Thc PC suggested that thc issue of Pay Plan Atljuslmcnls bc combined wilh I'crsonncl I'crfimnancc l{valuation, Mcril and Pcrlbmmnce Bonuses inlo one project. Ilill Ebbcn voluntccrol Io do the EMS ovemime study so that it could be presented with thc Sheriff's overtime study final report. Marie I)egado offered his assistance IO Bill. Bill also slated that his prcl~rcncc fi>r prQcct assigmncnts arc thc Personnel/Pay Plan issues. c. Commissioner Mac'Kic stated thai her top 3 priorities for thc I'C were thc Lamtlill. review and DeR review. She also asked the PC to review and comment on thc Ten Year ltt,sincss Plan developed by tile Collier County Airport Authority. f. Commcnls l¥om Robert Fcr,mndcz, County Administrator. Sec I~uragr'al;tl ti. above. g. Gary Vincent provided an updated cops'of thc PC roster and PC matrix. Itc askcd thc PC members to provide lo him any changes or additions. h. Bernard Weiss offered to make a draft matrix for project stat'ling. i. Thc ('ommitte¢ discussed how final reports should be prcscnlcd and dccid.:d that thc sul~commiucc chaimmn should decide thc fommt tbr thc final report. Thc t'C also decided tt~at thc subcommittee chairman should provide a brief status report of his or her prtLjcct on thc :~Itct:tlancc IBrm that will he I~ixcd lo Gary Vincent before every meeting. i. (;arv \"inccnl slated lhat hc wouhl mail thc minutes oflhc I'(' meetings lo each member n~ hdcr than 7 ttavs al'lc;' thc meeting. k. Thc PC decided to have a spccial meeting to develop Iht project matrix and make project ussignmcnts. Thc special meeting will be March 2, 1998 z,t 4:00 pm ill thc County ..\dminisl rator's Con I'crencc Room. ()Id llusiucss .hill sit, dy updalc. Karl Otto reported thai thc V Group study had a signil]cant error in thc calct~lz,titm of thc per bcd cost fi~r thc Naples jail facility, l lc will send ;t writlen rcqt,cst to l!d to do a feasibility sludy on diffcrcnt constmclion mclhods. h. Thc Shcrift's ovc,-linm study will bc conlplctc alicr one more meeting wilh the Shcrifl's I)cp:.U'llllClll. Thc final report will be presented to thc PC on M:~rch 18, l')9,q ;md then presented to thc B('C tm April 7, 1998 during a regular BCC meeting. c. Ed Fcrguson reporled that Human Resources is :'cry h;tppy with Iht software system that they purchased. The ability of the i IR system to intcrfimc witl~ other systems ;md dcparlmcnls is .still ;m issue. d. John Stockton is scheduling a meeting with Dwight lh'ock to discuss thc issue of verbatim recordings of BCC meetings. Bill Ebbcn suggested that John review thc ctmtrac! il'one exists. c. John Stockton will mcct with the County Administrator to discuss ll;c Inter Cotmtv Infimnational Database issue. 1: Bill Ncal would like to do ;m audi! of the progress on thc Budge! Review Process. Thc PC needs a fi~llow-up point-of-contact in the Budget Office. g. licrnard Weiss is assisling the Purchasing Dcparlmcnt to develop implementing thc PC's recommendations. Itc recommends they start with the past pcrlbnnance d:ttalmsc. Thc PC's recommendation thai high level cotmly employees should wait lbr 2 years bcfi~rc working For a company that markets to thc County is slill an isstlc. h. F. vahl:ltiol: Process of County Employees. See paragraph tl. trader Nc~x Business. i. Nominating Commitlee Report. See paragraph c. under New P, usincss. Meetinl4 adjourned I1:55 a.m. The next meeting will lie P, londay March 2nd, al 4:00 p.m. in the County Acllninistr:~lor's Con ference P, oom. cc. IIo:u'd of County Commissioners Office P, obcrt Fcr:landcz, County. Administralor Technical Advisory Committee and Citizens Advisory Committee ofthe The Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization ~..,.,.<. ; . Wednesday, January 21, 2:00 P.M. 199~ Supervisor of Elections Building Collier County Govemmer~t. orr,,Center H~nco<;k .... C~stanttne ~lsc'Kle Berr.v Planning Collier County's Transportation Future... Agenda Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) and Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) of the Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization's Wednesday, January 2 i, 199~ ~ 2:00 P.M. Collier County Government Center Supervisor of Elections Building 3301 East Tamiami Trail Naples. Florida Notice: TIt~' meeting of the Naples (Collier Coun09 Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO} Technical ~ldvi~ory and Citizen ,4dvisory Committees are open to the public and cltizen input is encouraged./Inyperson wt, hing to speal~ on an.}, scheduled item may do so upon recognition b.v the Ch airman. An), person desiring to have an item placed on the agenda shall make a request in writing, with a description and summarization of the item, t:~ the MPO Coordinator at least 14 days prior to the date of the next scheduled meeting of the MPO. An)' person who decides to appeal a decision of this board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto, and therefore ma), need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Addenda to the Agenda Approval of Minutes for Ibc November 19, 1997 Meeting Old Business A. Appointment of CAC and TAC Members to the Transit Advisory Committee (TRAC) B. Update from FDOT on the Status of 1-75/Golden Gate Interchange Elect a CAC Chairperson and Vice Chairperson New Business A. Review of MPO's Annual Unfunded Priorily Sexing Process B. Consideration of Proposed Changes for the MPO's Draft 1998-1999 Unified Planning Work Program C. Approval ora Contract Extension to David Plummet and Associates D. Discussion of Concurrency Management ?o Miscellaneous Correspondence A. }louse and Senate Bills for Reauthorization of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Ac~ (ISTEA). B. MPO & C^C/TAC 1998 Meeting Schedule Discussion of Addenda Adjourn 16G" 2: AGENDA ITEM Approval of the Minutes of the November 19, 1997 TAC/CAC Meeting 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 MINUTES OF THE TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE/ CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE OF THE NAPLES (COLLIER COUNTY) METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION DATE: November 19, 1997 TIME: 2:00 P.M. PLACE: Collier County Government Center Supervisor of Elections Classroom Building B Naples, Florida .TAC MEMBERS ,STAFF MEMBERS Wayne Arnold X Missy McKim (I) Vince Cautero X Edward Kant X Richard Gatti ABS Ted Soliday ABS Glen Ahlert (2) John Limbaugh X Fran Theberge X Ken Heatherington X Amy Taylor X Gavin Jones X Jeremy Battis ABS TAC ALTERNATES (I) Ann Walker (2) Maureen Swenson _TAC NON-VOTING MEMBERS Bill Lorenz ABS Arthur Dobberstein X Larry Anderson ABS Roger Krahl ABS Robert C. Daniel ABS Sherrill Culliver ABS CAC MEMBERS A. Gail Boorman Pettey Christine Straton Sally Barker Reed Jarvi John Asher Jack Pointer Walter Johnson Marlo Delgado X X X ABS X X ABS X OTHERS John Bozic, Good Wheels Debbie Hunt, FDOT Frank Black, FDOT CALLED TO ORDER 2.10 P.M. ADJOURNED: PRESIDING; Reed Jarvi, CAC Chairperson MINUTES BY: Gavin Jones MINUTES REVIE~VED BY:_ ITEM !. ADDENDA NONE 4.00 P.M. ITEM 2. APPROVAL OF TAC/CAC MINUTES of October 22, 1997. /he WPI# in the first sentence of item 4C was changed to 1142212. Mr. Pointer moved approval of the TAC/CAC minutes for the meeting of October 22, 1997. Ms. Straton seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. ITEM .3. OLD BUSINESS 3A. Consideration ora Revised Scope of Services for a Transit Development Plan Submitted by the Center for Urban Transportation Research. Mr. Heatherington discussed the changes that were the result of the Scoping Committee's work A Service Plan will be produced by August, 1998. Transportation Demand analysis will be done by staff. The contract amount will stay at $60,000.00 Mr. Delgado wanted transit demand data collected by ethnic group. t The term "Public Hearing" was changed to "Public Workshop." The deliverables are to be suitable for MS WORD, rather than Word Perfect. Ms. Straton moved that the scope of services be endorsed as amended. Ms. Barker seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. ITEM 4. NEW BUSINESS 4A. Consideration of the FDOT Draft Tentative Work Program Ms. Hunt discussed the features of the Draft Tentative Work Program. *lost at'the aviation items being moved out of the work program were being deferred, not canceled. The widening of CR 846 from SR 29 to the Hendry County line was being moved out because all of its costs went up. Mr. Kant asked if that project included bridge rehabilitation. Ms. Hunt said she would find out and return an answer. Of the Unfunded Priorities submitted to the FDOT, the new work program included numbers 3,4,5 and 9. Unfunded Priority Itl, the 1-75/Golden Gate Parkway interchange construction phase. could not appear because it was too soon after the ROW phase. Unfunded Priority #2, the PD&E phase of a second Gordon River bridge, would be studied in-house by FDOT staff. The new work program included the top two enhancement priorities, the Rural Safety Refuges, and the Immokalee Downtown Streetscape Beautification. Mr. Kant asked if, in the event the second project could be constructed early with other County funds, whether the State funds could be used to reimburse the County later, or used for another project. Ms. Hunt said yes. Mr. Kant noted that the estimated cost ofthe coordinated signal system had risen above the amount indicated in the work program. Ms. Hunt said that the new Federal act approving available funding will likely include more money. 16G Ms. Hunt noted that Federal funds can be used for projects offthe State system, but State funds cannot. Ms. Barker moved to endorse the FDOT's Draft Tentative Work Program for FY 1998/99 - 2002/03. Ms. Straton seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. 4B. Update on the Tamiami Trail Scenic Highway Program The State approved Collier County's application to have ' approxtmatel, fi~y miles of U,S 41 E. this side of the Dade County line declared a Scenic Highway. This was an information item. No action was taken. 4C. Distribution of the ! 997/98 CAC Manual and Review of Existing Bylaws This was an information item. No action was taken. 4D. Report on Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Plan Development Mr. Delgado recommended seeking the inclusion of TDM related questions in the Economic Development Council's (EDC) survey of county businesses. ITEM 5. Miscellaneous Correspondence and Discussions Mr. Bozic of Goodwheels was available to answer questions. A field trip of the Goodwheels office is still planned. To the question oftrips being refused, he said that though there may have been disagreement over the time the trip was served, there had been no trips refused to date. ITEM 6. NONE Discussion of Addenda ITEM 7. Adjourn 4:00 p.m. 4 Z AGENDA ITEM Old Business: Appointment to the Transit Advisory Review Committee SA SA SA SA SA SA 3A SA SA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 3.A. Appointment of CAe and TAC Members to the Transit Advisory Committee (TRAC) Objective: To appoint members &the CAC and TAC to the Transit Advisory Committee. Considerations: At the CAC/TAC Meeling of November 19, i 997, the CAC/TAC recommended approval for a Transit Development Plan (TDP) scope of services submitted by the Center for Urban and Transportation Research (CUTR). The scope &services includes a provision for the establishment of a Transit Review Committee. The role of the TRAC will be to monitor and provide input toward the development of the TDP. The first meeting ofthe TRAC will be workshop to explain what a TDP is and what the responsibilities of the review committee will be. The TRAC will receive presentations for all technical memorandums and will review each one. Staff Recommendation: Staffrecommends the CAC and TAC members review the draft TRAC committee structure on the following page and appoint from their memberships the appropriate representatives. Prepared by:. ~.~.~& ,,{'?r_7 Amy/ayl~ Transport~n Planne~ K~, Hc'at~erington. AICI~, MPO Date:. 01/12/98 Date: 01/12/98 Coordinator !Motion: Meeting Notes Made by: Second by: Vote: CAC/TAC Agenda January 21, 1998 Item 3A AGENDA ITEM Old Business: Presentation on the 1-75 Golden Gate Interchange Project 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B 3B EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Update frorn FDOT on the Status of l-7$/Golden Gate Interchange Objective: To hear an update on the progress of thc 1-75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway. Considerations: The FDOT's con~ltant Carter & Burgess is preparing thc Interchange Juslifieation Report {I JR) for the proposed i-75 interchange at Golden Gate Parkway. To date that work ha~ centered on a modeling effort by their sub- consultant UPS Greiner to determine traffic volume~ in Collier County in the intcrchange's design year. 2024. The projected coun .tywide permanent population in that year is just above 426,300. Using the most up-to-date predictions of traffic analysis zone (TAZ) contents in thc year 2024. and all of the latest simulation model (FSI. gYMS) features. UR$ Greiner' ha~ prepared a highway network in which all facilities operate at an acceptable level of service. This network is attached. ' Caner & Burgess will use the model assignment volumes for the next stage of their work, a detailed analvsis of the ability of the Pine Ridge and CR 951 interchange~ to adequately serve their respective traffic volumes in the year 2'024 without an ' interchange at Golden Gate Par~vay. Failure lo do so is the justification needed for an interchang~ at Golden Gate Parkway. To submit that analysis to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Carter & Burgess will need MPO confirmation ttmt the network on which the assignment volumes were produced is consistent with the currently adopted Long Range Plan. It will be staff's intention to seek the adoption ora Long Range Plan amendment in Februa .ry. 1998. The amendment would be the substitution of year 2004, 2014, and 2024 networks for the year 2000, 2010, and 2020 networks currently published. The year 2024 will be distributed at the meeting. Compared to the currently adopted 2020 Financially Feasible network (also' attached), the following reductions in capacity were possible in the creation of the 2024 networi~: · Golden Gate Par~vay from U.S. 41 N. to 1-75 from an expressway to a six lane arterial. · CR 951 from i-75 to just south of U.S. 41 E. from an expressway to a six lane arlerial. · Vanderbilt Beach Road from U.S. 41 N. to Livingston Rd from six lanes to four lanes. · Livingston Road from Radio Road to just south of E-W Livingston from six lanes to four lanes. · Logan Blvd. from Vanderbilt Beach Road to Immokalee Road from four lanes to Iwo lanes. · St. Andrews Blvd. from U.S. 41 E. to Rattlesnake Hammock Rd. from four lanes to two lanes. The following increases in capacity were made: · 1-75 from the Lee County line to Pine Ridge Road from four lanes to six lanes. · Radio Road from Santa Barbara Blvd. to Davis Blvd. from two lanes to four lanes. · Thomasson Drive from Ba.vview Drive to U.S. 4 ! E. from two lanes to four lanes. This 2024 network is estimated to cost less titan thc currently adopted year 2020 Financialh, Feasible network, and is thus also financially feasible. ' · Staff Recommendations: comments to the MPO. Gavin Jon~s. TransportatiOn Planner K~n~tfi~ington. AICP. 1~ ~oordinator That thc TAC/CAC review the proposed highway network and provide Date: 01/12/98 Date: 01/12/98 TACICAC Agenda Januao' 21. 1998 Item 3B !-75 Golden Gate Interchange update I- 21-98 B~ACI~ ROAO bland ALri)ort FLOR{DA DOT - DISTRICT O,~E NAPLES (COLLIER COUNTY) MPO L~m, Tt., dee AGENDA ITEM Election of CAC Officers 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Elect a CAC Chairperson and Vice Chairperson Objective: To have the CAC elect a new chair and vice chairperson for 1998. Considerations: In accordance with the Naples (Collier County) Metropolitan Planning Organization Rules and Procedures, the CAC shall elect a chair and vice chair at its first organizational meeting of the calendar year. Mr. Reed Jarvi has served as Chairman of the CAC since 1996. Ms. Chris Stratton has served as Vice Chairwoman for the same two terms. Staff Recommendation: To have the CAC nominate and elect o~cers to serve during 1998. Prepared by: my K. ~a~r', Transl~,atiOn Planner Date:. 1/12/98 Reviewed by.'~~ ~"~/~~~c,~'x l~e1 H~ath~ington, AICP, MPb Coc~rd~nator Date: 1/12/98 Meeting Notes Motion: Made by: Second by: Vote: MPO Agenda January 23, 1998 Item 4 AGENDA ITEM Review of the MPO's Annual Priority Setting Process 5A 5a 5A 5A 5a 5A 5A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Review of the MPO's Annual Unfunded Priori.tv.getting Process. Objective: To discuss the MPO's annual unfunded priority setting process. Considerations: Each year. following rccommcndaiions by tho CAC and TAC, thc MPO submits to FDOT a prioritizcd list of unfunded transportation projects. The FDOT uses this list to decide which new projects to include when it updates the Five Year Work Program. Attached is thc unfunded priority list that was approved by. thc MPO at their August meeting last )'ear. Staffsccks input on how to refine the method used to prioritize unfunded project phases. Staff Recommendations: This is an information item. . Date:, Gavin Jones. Transporla~on Planner Reviewed by: ,~_q.,.v.x - ~~l O_._~'~ ~v~. ,~fl Date: Kcn~calheri~gton.-AICP. MPO ~o~r~inator 01112198 01/12/98 Meeting Notes Motion: Made by: Second by: Vote: TAC/CAC Agenda Janua~' 21. 1998 Item 5A unfonded priority setting xsum !-21-98 !I 'j AGENDA ITEM Consideration of Proposed Changes for the Draft 1998-1999 UPWP 5B 5B 5b 5b 5B 5B 5B 5B 5B EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16 ' 2 Consideration of the MPO's Draft 1998-1999 Unified Planning Work Program Objective: To have the TAC./CAC cli~u.~ and review recommended tasks and ~btasks to lac addressed ia the Dra~ Unified Planning Work Program (LrpWP) for fiscal 1998-1999 Considerations: Each year, the MPO is required lo develop and submit to FHWA a Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP). Thc UPWP ~ervcs as thc resource and budgeting document for the MPO for the coming fi~cal yenr beginning July 1~. Due to a need to addre~ om' changing work environment, at the beginning of each year, MPO staff in cooperation with F'DOT begin an annual review om' program work tas~ for the upcoming year. The Department ha~ requested submittal of a Draft UPWP by March 16, 1998. Attached is a li~t of task~ to be addreased during thc UPWP review and update. Staff Recommendations: That the MPO approve the Dra.trt UPWP 1998-1999 recommendations for further consideration and refinement. Ken H~.h~ringto~ AICP, MPO Co~)cdinat~r Date: 01/12/98 Meeting Notes Motion: Made by: Second by: Vote: Xupwpgg TAC/CAC Agenda January 23, 1998 Item 5.B DEVELOPMENT OF THE UNIFIED PLANNING WORK PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEAR 1998-1999 Each year, the MPO is required to develop and submit to FHWA a Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP). The UPWP serves as the resource and budgeting document for the MPO for the coming fiscal year beginning July 1 st. Due to a need to address our changing work environment, at the beginning ofeacn year, MPO staffin cooperation with FDOT begin an annual review our program work tasks for the upcoming year. The Department has requested submittal ora Draft UPWP by March 16, 1998. Following is a list of tasks to be addressed during the UPWP review and update: 1.0 Program Administration Update the section beginning on page 3 regarding the status of the previous years work program and 98-99 planning priorities. · Update the section beginning on page 4 regarding the MPO Public Involvement program · Update the section beginning on page 4 regarding Local Government Comprehensive Planning ( Comp Plan Transportation Element is in compliance). · The incorporation of the City of Marco presents the prospect for modification of the Naples-Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization structure to ensure appropriate representation of the new city. 3, new administrative task may be required to address membership reapportionment and rules of the IMPO. 2.0 Data Collection and Surveillance Activities · Update Task 2.1 to reflect a review ofthe FSUTMS model zonal and land use data · Expand Data and Surveillance activities to include the incorporation of geographic information system (GIS) techniques · Include the purchase ora computer work station and peripherals for the purpose of pursuing GIS activities AGENDA ITEM Approval of the Contract Extension with Plummer and Associates 5(2 5c 5c 5c 5c 5c 5c 5c 5c EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Approval ora Contract 'Extension to David Piummer and Associates Objective: To have thc TAC/CAC consider a contract extension to David Plummet and Associates for their work on the Service Volume Update. Considerations: At their August 8, 1997 meeting, thc MPO authorized the Chairman to sign MPO Task Order 97-2, a contract with David Plummet and Associates to produce a Service Volume Update. That agreement included a projection that the work would be completed by March 9, 1998. To date this work has included thc formation ora Technical Team, composed of City, Counly. and State lr,~c engineers, to agree on thc methodology used in the work, and the assembly of input values needed to perform the analysis. · Duc to delays in thc provision to thc consultant of input values needed for their work, staffis seeking approval of an extension in the contract until April 30, 1998. This extension will still permit thc use of the revised tables in the first iteration of the two tier screening and analysis of local road segments prescribed in the County's Congestion Management System. Staff Recommendations: That the TAC/CAC endorse a contract extension to April 30, 1998 for David Plummet and Associates' work on the Service Volume Update. Gavin Jones, TransporlOiion Planner ~.en ~atherin~on. AICP. MPO Cqordinator Date: Ol/12/98 Date: 01/12/98 Meeting Notes Motion: Made by: Second by: Vote: TAC/CAC Agenda January 21, 1998 Item 5C Service Volume Update contract extension !-21-98 I~G 2 AGENDA ITEM Discussion of Concurrency Management 5D 5D 5D 5D 5D 5D 5D 5D EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 613 ,.' 2 Discussion of Concurrency Management. Objective: To discuss concurrency management in Collier County. Considerations: Each year, following the collection of traffic counts from participating agencies. MPO staff prepares an inventory of axle factored traffic counts for the road segments that make up Collier County's arterial and collector road network. Based on Ircnds observed in the traffic counts over the pr~'ious five )'ears, new predictions arc made for the year in which the road segment's operating Im,'el of sen'icc (LOS) will first exceed its adopted standard LOS. MPO staff usc this information to provide input into the unfunded priority setting process for the FDOT's work program. Count' staff use this information to adjust the county's capital improvement element (CIE) for roads. Attached is a report that forms part of the Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) presentation to the BCC early in each fiscal year. It contains ~ummarv statistics based on the annual average daily traffic numbers produced at the end of 1996. Staff will be available to discuss this process in more detail. Staff Recommendations: This is an information item. Gavin Jones~ TransportaJon Planner K~en'-eat'h}:flr~gton, AICP, MPC0Coo~'ainator Date: Date: 01112198 01112198 Meeting Notes Motion: Made by: Second by: Vote: TAC/CAC Agenda January 21, 1998. Item SD, Concurrency Management 1-21-98 TRANSPORTATION EXISTING CONDITIONS REPORT - 1996 Objective: To provide the Board of County Commissioners with an "existing conditions" analysis of the transportation system in the unincorporated area of Collier County. Purpose: This analysis is provided to assist in the preparation of the Annual Update and lnventoD' Report (AUIR), and more specifically to assist in the determination of adequate (transportation) public facilities. Considerations: analysis: The following considerations are to be assumed for the purposes of this · The analysis year is the twelve month period ending December 3 i. 1996. that being the last complete 3'ear of data collection. The Collier County Generalized Roadway Service Volumes/duly 1990). have been employed for urban arterial roads while the FDOT's Collier County-Specific Generalized Maximum Service Volume Tables (1992 release) were utilized for urban collector, rural and freeway links. Traffic volume data (raw counts) have been factored by an axle factor of .9524 to yield actual vehicle counts. · Traffic volumes (and capacities) are two-way totals. · Average Daily Traffic (ADT) service volumes are based upon peak season, peak hour service volumes. · Production factors that have caused advancements or delays have already been included in this analysis. · All State highway projects needed to assist the County in meeting ~ts concurrency requirements are fully funded by the FDOT, except s~here noted below. Attachments: Attached are the 1996 .C. olller County Transportation Planning Database table and the Tentative FY 98 to FY 02 Capital Improvement Plan. Conclusions: Staffhas reached the following conclusions from the 1996 Capacity Analysis: The anticipated increase in traffic gro~v~ system-wide in 1996 has resulted ~ only minor adjustments in the period of time available to get needed improvements into prcdu'ction. Existing Conditions Report - 1996 16G'2 Of the 121 traffic count stations in thc Coastal and/mmokalcc Urban Areas for which 1995 data is also available, 72.8% (88 stations) reported increases over the 1995 annual average daily traffic (AADT) volumes as follows: . · 24.0% (29 stations) show an increase greater than 10% over 1995 14.9% ( 18 stations) show an increase of 5%- 10% over ! 995 · 33.9% (41 stations) show an increase of up to 5% over 1995 Thirty three stations (27.2°,/o) reported a decrease in traffic volumes from 1995 ,as tbliows: · 16,5% (20 stations) show a decrease of 5% or less · 10.7% (13 stations) show a decrease ofmor¢ than 5% Traffic Circulation Element Recommendations: In accordance with EAR recommendations, and pending approval by the BCC, amendments to the Transportation Element will have the following effect on level of service (LOS) determinations: · One proposed amendment ~Sii change the LOS standard on the portion o£ Vanderbilt Beach Rd. from U.S. 41 to Gulfshorc Dr to "policy constrained." This will eliminate thc existing LOS deficiency on that segment. · One proposed amendment ~511 change the LOS standard on state roads in the Trans~tioning Urbamzcd area (see Transportation Element map TR-IAW) from "C" to "D." This will affect segments of Davis Blvd. cast of Santa Barbara Blvd., and segments ofSR-95 i between U.S. 41 and Marco Island. This will eliminate the imminent deficiency on Davis Blvd. between Radio Rd. and CR-95 I. and the existing deficiency on thc segment ofSR-9qi from New York Drive to the Marco Island Bridge. ' Capital Improvement Element Recommendations: In order that concurrency rcqmrcmcnts be mc( In thc period 1998-2002. it is recommended that thc following improvements be added to thc 1998-2002 CIE Update: · Advance the Construction Phase for CIE Project//8: Immokalee Road (CR-846) (four laning) from 1-75 to CR-95 I. Construction 1998- i 999 (Currently 2000 - 2001 ) Advance thc Construction Phase tbr CIE Project #41' Pine Ridge Road {CR896) (six-laning) from Airport Road to 1-75. Construction i 999-2000 (Currcntly 2000-2001 ) Add the Construction Phase for CIE Project #22: Logan Blvd. (six-laning) from Pinc Ridee Road to Green Blvd. - Construction 2000-2001 (Currently Not Funded) Add the Construction Phase for CIE Project #63: Vanderbiit Beach Rd. (four-laning) from Airport Road to 1-75. Construction 2000-2001 (Currently Not Fundcd) Ex~Sting Conditions Repotl. 1996 166 2 Add thc Construction Phase £or CIE PrOJect #1' I I i"' Avenue North. (four-h'ming) from U.S. 41 to Vanderbiit Drive. Construction 1999-2000 (Currently Not Funded) Add the Construction Phase for CIE Project # 16: Radio Rd. (four-laning) from Santa Barbara Blvd. to Davis Blvd. Construction 2000-2001 (Currently Not Funded) Add the Design Phase for CIE Project #6: Immokalee Rd. (six-laning) from U.S. 41 to Airport Rd. Design 2000-2001 (Currently Not Funded) Add Major Reconstruction Projects (CIE #27), Traffic Signals ('CIE #28), and Advanced ROW (CIE #34) funds to FY02 as appropriate. Other Recommendations: The most rccent traffic count on SR 29 from SR 29A North to SR 82 dropped the sc~mnent from a deficient condition. If the LOS deficiency re. occurs in future years, the Count,,' should seek to change the adopted LOS standard on the road from "C" to "!5.: Prcparcd By:.Y~ o v_~.~- Gavin Jones. TransportatiOn Planner D. Wayne Arnold, AICP, Planning Services Director Vincent Al. Cautero, AICP, Community Development & ~nvironmental S[ervices Administrator Existing Cond~ons Report. 1996 16G' 2 Dave Bobanick, P.E., Transportation Services Director Datt;: Proj¢¢'ts Director Ex~sting Conditions Report. 1996 AGENDA ITEM 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Miscellaneous Correspondence 6 ..................... I iii II IIIII IIII I II II I IIIIII IIII -- I ISTEA Reauthorization A Comparison of House and Senate Bills A $ !S i::I I; I ATI I::1N I::i F' M ET I~ r'lpl::i LITA N PLANNING I~ R 1:SAN I ZATII:3 N S December 12, 1997 16G 'Z ISTEA: 6 Years; S26.2 billion average annual funding level for highways and transit. 0 vrs S36.S B avg. annual funding (Federal revenue estimated for each coming year must be sufficient to cover increased oudays above those in the Bal. Budget Agreement of 1997 that are associated with the higher funding levels in the House bill. If projected revenues are insufficient, then the coming year's fu,lding would be reduced. I Smart EPW 6 .vrs $24.6 B avg. annual funding Scm:re BaMd~tg 6 .'ers S6.05 B avg. annual funding AMPO: Reauthorization at the highest possible funding levels that can be supported bv the Highway Trust Fund. · Recommendation: Urge changes in the Balaqced Budget Agreement of 1997 to enable authorization or' funding levels that are consistent s~-ith what e.vjsti,~g and projected revenues to tile Highway Trust Fund can sustain. Specifically: (l) urge support for higher budget outlays for transportation, and support for actual use of the revenues from the 4.3 cent deficit reduction tax that was transferred to the Highway Trust Ftmd in I097; (2} support Senators Byrd and Gramm t'l-X) amendment expected to be odered when the bill goes to the Senate floor fl~at would enable the revenues from the 4.3 cents to be used for transportation; and {3} support removing tile Transportation Trust Funds from the unified federal budget. Formulas ISTEA: Apportionment formulas under ISTEA's highway programs are a combination of neecb,based I lnterstate Maintenance. Bridge. and CMAQ) and relative historic shares of apportioned funds for the core highway programs (NHS and STP). In addition. ISTEA i,cludes several equi ,ty adjustment categories: Ntinimum Allocation. Donor State Bonus, Interstate Reimbursement. Hold Harmless. and 90 Percent of Payments Guarantee. · IS-M: commercial vehicle contribution to Trust Fund: VMT; lane trdles · NHS: rural lane nziles. rural VMT; urban lane miles: urban VMT; commerdal vehide contributions to Trust Fund · STP: pop; cotru~ercial vehicle contributions to Trust Fund: total contributions to Trust Fund · Requires USDOT to conduct study of urbanized area formula and recommend changes for apportioning funds to ~trbanized areas ~x~th pop between 50 K aa~d 200 K Senate EPW · IS-M component of NHS: IS lane miles and VMT · IS Bridge component of NHS: sq. ft. of deficient IS bridges · NH$: principal arterial lane miles. VMT. and sq ft of deficient bridges; diesel fuel ~e; principal arterial lane miles per capita · STP: lane miles: VMT; sq ft of defident bridges; contributions to Trust Fund; contributions to Highway Trust Fund l Senate Banking · Modifies formula for Fixed Guldewav Modem:zadon Program (i.e.. "Rail Mod"3 to increase the share of the program that goes to newer rvstems · Requires USDOT to conduct study of urbanized area formula and reconm~end changes for apportioning funds to urbanized areas ~Sth pop between 50 K and 200 K AMI'O: While modernization of factors and formulas may be appropriate. AaMPO. which represents MPOs across the country., does not have any position regarding x~thich formula approaches should be adopted. 16G 2 Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality ram 5 ISTEA: Established $ I B per )'ear ~over 6 }'ears) program to fund transportation projects l i.e.. Transportation Controi Measures. TCMs; Inspection ~md Maintenance programs) to improve air quaiitv. Fua~& apportioned states based on nonattainment population and severity, with t/z% minimum avporticr(ment guarantee. btates xx'ithout nonattainme,~t areas may use funds for STP purposes. CMAQ ft~ds ca,mot be wed for si:~-je occupanc)., vehicle I SOV~ proiects. Provides $I0 B over o '.'ears Makes cold start programs eligible for CMAQ Required National Academy of Sciences report on CMAQ air quality impacts Permits states to flex 5096 of the increase in CMAQ funding above the FY 1906 level No provision is made for new nonattainment Itransitional) areas that may be desi.u~ated under new air quality standards CMAQ apportionment formula: current law with addition of CO &. PM, .mintenance and multiple pollutants I (Sec. 109 &505) ~ Smam £PI4' Provides 57 B over b years Makes cold start programs eligible for CMAQ No prox4sion is made for nea. nonattainment areas that may be designated under new air quality standards Eliminates large state pool for CA, NY & TX In nonattainment states that receive V~ % min., allows STP eligibility for "excess" CMAQ funds No provision is made for new nonattainment itransidonal) areas that may be designated under ,~ew air quality standarcks CMAQ: current law addition of CO, maintenance and multiple pollutants; new weights for nonattainment areas (Sec. 1102 & 1123) Stna~ Banidng NA - Sevatate highway program only. AMPO: The CMAQ program has been successful in providing financial assistance to metropolitan areas in attaining and maintaining National Ambient Air Quality Stand. ds (NAAQS). Recommendation: Continue CMAQ funding for nonattainment areas, and extend to new nonattainment areas or transitional areas once designated under the new NAAQS. Areas in nonattainment for particulate matter (PM) should be eligible for CMAOo and PM should be included in the formula for apportioning CMAQ funds. 16G 7 ISTEA: No programs for funding border/trade corridor programs. · SI.25 billion over 6 ws for a National Corridor Planning and Development Discretionary. Program to assist States in planning and developing highway corridors (state eligibility) · $570 million over 6 ws for Coordinated Border In frasttucture Discretionary. Program (state eligibility} (Sec. 115 - I 16) Smate £PW · S8.4 million over 6 yrs for border crossing planning incentive grants (state &. MPO eligibility) · $1,q million over 6 vrs for trade corridor pla,ming incentive grants (state eligibility} · $750 million over 6 vrs for planning, design and implementation of safety and congestion relief for either border crossings or trade corridors {state & MPO eligibility) (Sec. I 116) I I Senate Banking · NA /'.MPO: ,-V.MPO ~upports border crossing,'trade corridor transportation planning and management. Hmvever. MPOs shotdd be involved in the development of corridor development and management pla,Is, and in the development of border infrastructure and safety programs, and should be eligible recipients of planning ~ants and:or pro}eot funds. Moreover. in order for federal funds to be spent on trade corridor or border crossing projects, those projects must be subiect to the normai states,Sale and metropoiitan transportation planning process, and be included in the MPO and State long range plans and Transportation Improvement Pro~oans. Recommendation: IF border/trade corridor programs are clarified, clarify that federal fm~ding made available for implementation of trade corridor or border crossing projects is subjec[ to the statexvide and metropolitan transportation planning provisions under sections 134 and 135 of title 23. United States Code. Z Metropolitan Plannin Factors ISTEA: Requires 16 factors to be considered in developing metropolitan transportation plans and programs. [Sec. 134(0] Ho~ Consolidates planning factors to 7 broad goals and objectives (economic vitality.; safety and security; accessibility and mobility; enx4ronment, energy, and quality of life; system integration and connectivit}~ efficient system utilization and operation: and system preservation. ) Consideration of factors is not mandato .ry. (Sec. 124) Senate £PW · Consolidates planning factors to 7, similar to those in the House bill · Links protection of the environment, energy conservation and improved quail .ty of life to land use planning. · Consideration of factors is mandatory., (Sec. 1601) Semate Banki~ Consolidates planning factors to 7 similar to those in the Home bill Adds "consideration of...coordin ating land use and transportation plans and programs" in the context of en~4ronmental protection and enhanced quality of life. Consideration of the 7 factors is mandatory MPO, in cooperation the state and transit operators, must establish goals that relate to the 7 factors and propose projects, programs and strategies to achieve those goals. (Sec. AMPO: We support consolidation of ISTEA's 16 factors. Such consolidated factors should incorporate national goals, but ~'ith the priority and weight that would be given to those goals .~ecided cooperatively bx' the state. MPO and tr~msit operator through the metropolitm~ planning process. Recommendation: Support consolidation and mandatory consideration of 16 factors. Ensure that the MPO is given authority to weigh the relevance and priority of tl~e factors through the planning process. 16G 2 Long Range Plan Development/TIP Development/Project Selection ISTEA: Long-range transportation plan and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) developed jointly by the state and MPO; 20-year project-specific, financially constrained plans; 3-yr fiscally constrained TIPs' which must be updated bie'nniallv and approved by the Governor; in Transportation Management Areas .- TMAs lurba,fized areas over 200'.000 pop} .. MP6 selects STP. C,MAQ. safety and enhancement proiects in consultation with the state, and the state selects NHS. bridge and IS-bi in cooperation with the MPO and in conformance with the TIP; in non-TMA areas, the state selects projects in cooperation x~fith the NIPO in conformance with TIP; Statewide long range plan must include projects that are "consistent with the metropolitan TIP." Changes TIP update period to once every 3 vrs (Sec. 124) Omits provisions requiring following progratns to be conducted consistent x~'ith d~e metropolitan and statex~fide planning processes: bridge. National Trade Corridor and Border Crossing Planning & Infrastructure. Scenic BDvays' and Variable Pricing Proiects. Requires study of the effectiveness of local elected offidals in transportation planning and development (Sec, 125) Se~mte EPW · Retains 2-year update of TIP · Eliwfinates the requirement for proiect. specific funding sources in the plan or TIP/STIP · Gives the states flexibility to move projects ~Sthin the TIP or STIP 3-yr priority list ~'ithout an official amendment. Report language clarifies that such action still requires the approval of the Governor and MPO · Eliminates language requiring the projects included in the STIP to be consistent with the metropolitan TIP. (Secl601 & 1602) Senate Banlcing Retains the 2-w update of the TIP Retains provisions requiring identification of project-specific funding sources in the TIP and plan Gives the states flexibility to move proiects x~Sthin the TIP or STIP 3.vt priority list x~4thout an official amendment. Report language clarifies that such action still requires the approval of tile Governor and MPO Eliminates language requiring the projects included in the STIP to be consistent ~Sth the metropolita,~ TIP (Sec. 4~ ANIPO: ISTEA's planning and program development provisions provide the blueprint for an enhanced state;metropolitan partnership, strengthened planning processes, and greater accountability. That framework must be presen, ed. In addition, institutional hiPO governm~ce issues vary from place to pi'ace and can best be addressed at the local level: however, federal oversight of the planning prgcess througt~ the USDOT's role itl certification reviews is the appropriate place for federal review and involvemenc Recommendations; Delete provisions in Senate EPW bill that eliminate the requirement to identi .fy pro}ect- spedfic funding sources; In the Senate bills, reinsert provisions clarifying that the STIP must include projects consistent with the metropolitan TIP; in the House bill, reinsert provisions requiring that projects funded under the bridge, National Trade Corridor and Border Crossing Planning & Infrastructure. Scenic Byways. and Variable Pridng Programs are subject to the metropolltm~ and statea, ide planning processes. I1 16G Major Investment Studies Environmental Streamlining/Integrated Decision-M ' 13 ISTEA: USDOT defined Maior Investment Studies (MISs) in the 1993 metropolitan planning regulations as the mechanism for assuring highway and transit projects are subject to a consistent, jointly coordinated. corridor level alternatives analyses process. Eliminates MIS as a separate requireme,~t and requires USDOT to integrate the MIS into the analyses required under NEPA Requires USDOT to develop &. implement coordinated environmental revie~v process for highway projects. Process world provide for concurrent environmental reviews within agreed upon time periods. Establishes dispute resolution med~anism. Establishes state environmental review pilot for up to $ states where USDOT environmental review responsibilities wouJd be delegated to the states (Sec.$03 & 502) Stnat~ EPW Does not explicitly elintinates MIS. but establishes a new "Integrated Decisionmaking Process" for surface transportation proiects that encompasses and integrates transportation planning, predesign, and decision making ~th the envlronmentnJ review ~rocess. (Sec. 1225) $~nate Bmddng Does not elirrfinate NIlS AMPO: The Major Investment Study concept has been an effective tool for ensuring corridor level. comprehensive analyses of alternative strategies to meet travel needs in a corridor, for early consideration of environmental issues, and for early public involvement. AMPO recognizes that there are ~oncerns with duplication of analyses, aa~d time and cost delays as well as with inconsistencies between the ua~constrained. full needs of the corridor mad financially constrained plans Recommendation: Ensure streamlining retains concept of comprehensive corridor-level analysis of alternative strategies to meet needs, and provides that the metropolitan planning process continues to provide the framework for defining mad scoping the parameters of the corridor analysis. House bill language requiring integration of MIS with NEPA process is acceptable it' additional bill language is included to ensure preservation of MIS concept of the link between systems ~nd project level plann;ng as stated above.. Other Provisions 15 Ho~ Performance Bonus Program. directs the Secretary. to develop performance-based criteria for distribution of not more than 5% of IS.M. bridge. Safety. STP and CMAQ programs. Establishes new High Cost Interstate System Reconstruction and Improvement Program for ,~aior IS proiects costing more than the lesser of 15200 million or .50% of a state's total apportionment (part formula, part diso'etionar},) Establishes a High Risk Road Safety Program (formula) Establishes a S42 million per yr. Access to lobs Challe,ge Grant Pilot Program. Senate EPW ' Establishes a Transportation and Community and System Preservation Pilot Program consisting of -. reseatch: a planning performance program to provide funding to states. MPOs and local governments that want to begin integrating transportation phmning with conununitv preservation. environmental protection. and land use; and an implementation assistm~ce program to prox4de funding to states. MPOs and local governments that ~have developed state of the art approaches to integration of plans and progrnms with conuntmitv prese~'ation and environmental protection Establishes a program ($25 m ox, er 6 y'rs) to provide for completion of TRANSIMS. and to provide support for early deployment to states. MPOs. and other transportation management agencies. Senate Banking Authorizes 15100 million per .sa- welfare -to-work transportation program AMPO: 15omc of these provisions are likely to be included in the final reauthorization bill. A2vlPO's Pollc'v Committee will review these and other provisions to determine if additional policy, positions ate needed. Date: To: From: RE: January 8, 1998 MPO Board and Advisory Committee Members Ken Heatherington, MC'P, MPO Coordinator hIPO & TAC/CAC 1998 Meeting Schedule MPO & TAC/CAC 1998 Meeting Schedule (Subject to Change) Month/Day TAC/CAC Location January: February March April May June June July August September October November MPO L0catign 21" 27th 25* 22" 20* 17' 24* 22''a 26* 23a 21' 180. Super of Elections Joint Meeting All Advisory Committees Super of Elections Super of Elections Super of Elections Transportation Priorities Forum Super of Elections Super of Elections Super of Elections Super of Elections Super of Elections Super of Elections 23a BCC Chamber 27* Conservancy Lunch 12: Noon; Mtg 1-3 PM 270. BCC Chamber 240. BCC Chamber 22a City Council Chamber 4:30 p.m. - 7:30 p.m. TBA 26* BCC Chamber 240. BCC Chamber 28* BCC Chamber 250. City Council Chamber 23a BCC Chamber 20'~ BCC Chamber Naples (Collicr County) Metropolitan Planning Organization ~X) N~ H~rash~ I~ Na~ FlorMa 34104 C C T A C Naples Collier County Metropolitan Planning Organization TO: FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: MEMORANDUM Sue Filson, Administrative Assistant to the Board Bleu Wallace, Utility Regulation Manager and Executive Director, Collier County Water & Wastewater Authority Transmittal of Minutes - Collier County Water & Wastewater Authority February 23, 1998 Transmitted herewith are the approved minutes or the Collier County Water and Wastewater Authority for October 27, 1997, January 26, 1998 and February 11, 1998. These minutes were approved January 26, 1998, February 11, 1998, and February 23, 1998, respectively. Direct any questions to me at extension 7146. Hancock Constantine COI,i,IER COUNI'V WATI';R ANI) WASTEWATER AUTIIOI~I'I'Y Minutes of Rcgul:tr Meeting Board Meeting Room Floor, Administration lluilding 2:00 I'M, October 27, ! 997 ,\n :re(Ilo record of Ihc following proceedings is on file wilh Ihc ()fficc of Ulility I~,c,gul:ltion, Suite 203, Administration Building, County Government Center, 3301 East Tamiami Trail, Naples, l:iorida 34112, Phone (941) 774-8577. .,'x:;:;i:;t:mt (~muly Attorney Thomas C. Pahncr was present lo provide legal advice I, thc Authority and Utility R¢sulation Manaser D. IL. "Bleu" Wallace ~vas prcscnl to rcprt'scnt ~l~c ()flicu of Utility Regulation. !. (;:ill lo Order (l)etcrmination of Quorum). ('h:m-m:u~ l)r. Ncno Spagna called the meeting to order al 2:00 I'M, dccl;:ring that fimr mcmhcrs were present constituting a quorum. Also present was Vice Ch;tirman Richard I:. l{ctgm:mth Mr. Robert C. Bennett, Jr. and Mr. Joseph A Mandy. II. Apl)rovnl of Minutes- September 22, 1997 Meeting. Thc minutes for September 22, 1997 xvcrc approved (4-0) allcr motion hy Mr. Bennett and a second by Mr. Bcrgmann. 11 !. ()pen lo lite Pul)lie. ,,t ' ill atlcildallCe alld asked if anyone wished to address Thai~m:m Slmgna welcomed ~ rests Authority. Items I,[cquiring Action by tile Authority: 0 :\. 1997 Price Ind'ex Application for Eagle Creek Utility Il, inc. {.'hai~m:m Spagna requested Mr. Wallace addrcs:; Ihis item. Mr. Wall:mc advised thal Eagle (;reck Utility II, Inc. has submitted an application lbr a price imlcx fi~r 1997. Ntaff' noted several errors on thc original applicati,m which was returned I'!agh: Creek lJlility. After rcsubmission, the tJtility's api~lication mci l}lt? rcquircmcnls of thc ordinance to receive a !.36 % increase in waslcwatcr rates. Staff has reconciled the applicntion nnd recommemts thai Eagle Creek Utility be granted an increase in annual revenues of S2,186.00. After Mr. Wallace rcsp(mdcd lo several questions From Mr. Bcrgmamh Mr. llcnnctt moved approve Final Order No. 97-20; seconded by Mr. llergm:mn. Motion passed unanimously (4-0). '~ ' - - : ........ (:onsideration of Certificate Revocation - Rookery liar tltilitv Company, ! nc. Mr. Wallace advised th;it staff is in receipt of a final order is:;ucd by Iht: Dqmrtmcnt of Fmvironmcntal Protection, £outh District. This order Rookcry Bay Utility. Inc. its operating pcmfit renewal for its waslcwalcr treatment plants. Section 1-27 o~ Collier County Ordinancc 96-6 states thai "all utilities shall comply xvilh all rules, rcBulalions and quality and standards pcaaining to such utilities as iwomulgatcd by any and all gox, t:~ agencies having jurisdiction thereof." Mr. Wallace stated that so Ion?, a~; R.<)k,'~ v Bay Utilities operates its facilities whhont a permit and is in non-comp;k..~{' DEP rules and regals]ion, that said utility is in violation of Co]lilly Violation of County ordinance can constitute grounds for rcwxmlhm Utilities was]ewe]er ccdificatc. Based on the above, staff has followed County ordinance and recommends that the Collier County Water and Was]twa]ct Authority issue a show cause order giving thc utility over 60 days to respond public hearing to be scheduled for Janua~ 26, 1998. AFter thc sh.w hcarin~ is held and thc AulhoriW recommends revocation action, the Board County Commission may then revoke thc Utility's was]ewe]er ccai~c;m~. Wallace advised that Mr. Sanl~rd Mania is representing Rookc%' Bay t llil;tv to(lay's meeting. Also in aHcndancc is Mr. Andy Baficnbrock, Enviromncntat Manager of thc Dcpa~mcnt of Environmcnlal Protcction, South District At this time, Chaimmn Spagna rcquested that Mr. Baricnbrock fron~ tl,,- outline his department's actions regardihg Rookery Bay Utility. Mr. B:. h'~ d passed out to At,thority members a brief history of some of the problems Il... I ~I has been having with tile Rookery Bay Utility facility. Mr. Baricnbrock (icscribcd some of thc problems with Iht facility over tile last seven years as bcin.,.:; quality, chemical demand iimils, suspended solids limils, chlorinali(m disinfection, to name a few. Thc DEP has also addrcsscd problems with ~h,. facility design and operation and maintenance of thc facility. To date, thc DEl' has seca no real effort on thc part of Rookcry Bay Ulility Io correct thc prol)lcms. Thc DEP also h,'m had. problems accessing thc facility, and subscqncntly had obtain a court order rdluiring Rookery Bay Utility leave a key to thci~ f'ac~l~v with thc Court A(hninistrator. Mr. Baricnbrock advised the AtLlhority Ih:ti lhcrc might lie some movement to ~;cll the utility to another company. However, Io this date, no definitive action has been taken. The DEP is still enforcing their case againsl tile utility. Mr. Barienbrock ansxvered nun]crous questions from thc At,thority rcgardin!~ the Utility's possible sale, the hislory of tile Utility, thc violalions noted by thc Ibc show c;msc or(tcr, crc. Mr. Wallace prcscnlcd tile Autho:.iiy :;cvcral pictures of an on-si',c visit s.'..i:'£... conducted recently of Rookery Bay [Jlilily's fhcilities. I Il I ........ · ....... 111111 Al Ihis lime, Iht Aullmrily he:mi from Rookery Bay IJlilily's legal Sanfiml Martin. Mr. Marlin commented on some of thc previous lcs~i,mnv ~r. Barionbrock of thc I)EP. Mr. Matin discussed tho Ulilily's II,fcc Ilteir inabilily Io obi:fin a pennil, lie slalccl llmt Rooke~ Bay IJlililv ha~ rcclucslcd Iht Connly Ulilily t)cparmmnl Io accept Iho Po~-au-i'rincc fitcilitv bulk customer. Thc County indicalcd Ihni iflho lc~s and comlilions were mc~ by Rooke~ Bay Ulilily, including lho paymenl of all impacl fees, Ihcn conncclion a bulk cuslomcr cmdd occur, l lc limn answered numerous questions asked Aulhorily members. Mr. Maain confirmed Ihal negotiations wid~ IJlililics. xvcrc on-going al Ihis limo for Iho sale of Rooke~ Bay Ulilily. l towcvcr. conlract lo purchase has been drawn up as yet. Chaimmn Spagna slaled his concern for the hcalth aspect of thc silu;dion. Bennett made a motion lo apl)rove Ihe show cause order, and dirccl slaff adveaise for and schedule a show cause puhlic hearing; motion seconded hy Mr. I~crgtnann. Motion passed unanimously (4-0). Clmi~an St)agna Ih:raked Imth Mr. Andy Barienbmck and Mr. Snnfont M~in for allending Ioday'~ V. Exccutivc Director's Rcporl. Mr. Wallace advised thc Authority his pi:m to allocate fimds in next year':, bml.v, ct to an Authority member to the Utility Rate School held in Clcanvatcr Bc;.ch next ()trebor. Susan Rossi, Senior Secretary for tile Office of Utility Regulation, attended thc recent Utility Rate School and ',','ill give a brief outline of thc week-long course al II]c next/\uthority meeting. Mr. Wallace and Mr. Pahncr traveled Io Clcanvatcr Beach last wcck t() thc site of tl~e IJ~ilily Rate School, lo attend the first meeting of the Florida County Rcgulalors. Rcprcscntativcs from Item:redo, llillsborough, Marion, Sarasota, and Flaglcr Cotmtics ancnded the rattling. Also altcncling the meeting was Collier Counly's special counsel, Mike Twomcy, who represents our office in Tallahassec before the l.cgislamrc, Iht First District Court of Appeals, and any matters concerning thc Public Sca'icc Mr. Twomey addressed the stalulo~ requirements for local regulation and thc history thogc requirements. Also discussed wns any upconling Legislative issues that pertain to local regulation. Mr. Wallace will present a briefsumma~ of this motrin?. :~ thc m:x~ Authmity mt:cling. Mr. Wall;mc advised Ibc Authorily Ihal shfffhas no pcnding actions al It,is trait. I Inlcs,; an ilem comes up Ihal requires At,lhorily nction, n Novcmhcr or Dccc,nbcr mcctmg xt ltl n-t bc necessary. North Marco Utilities has rcquesled n staffassistcd rate case, Ilowcvc! to date, they have not mol the minimum filing rcquircmcnls. Mr. Jim Wiggins, Fiscal Analyst in tile Office of Utility Regulation. umlcrwc,~t heart surgc~ this morning al Naples Community liospilal. Mr. Bcnncll asked Mr. Wallace lo semi thc Authority's best wishc~o-Mr. Wiggins during his h,~spil:d s~ay. VI. Authority Members Discussion. Mr. Mandy asked Mr. l'almcr scvcral legal questions regarding thc upcoming show hearing. Mr. Wallace also answered scvcral procedural qucstions pert;fining Io Ibc causc order. VII. Adjournment. Mr. Bennett moved to adjourn the meeting; scconded by Mr. Mandy. unanimously (4-0). Passe(l An audio record of the following proceedings is on file with thc ()ffir,. Re,,4, ulation, Suite 203, Administration Iluildi,l,,.l,, County Government (:enter, Iqasl Tamiami Trail, Naples, i:lorida 34112, Phone (941) 884-8577. Assistant County Attorney 'thomas C. l'ahncr ,,,,,as present lo provide lcg.d Authority and IJtility Regulation Manager D.E. "Bleu" Wallace wns l,,::.,:~f tim ¢)fficc of Utility Regulation. , i. (:all to Order (Determination of Qnorum). ('hairm:m Dr. None Spagna called the meeting to order at 2:00 PM, <h:cl.n i~,:., ,I ...... members were present constituting a quorum. Also present were Vice (Th:,mn:m F. Bcrgmann, Mr. Roberl C. Bennett, Jr., Mr. George J. Schroll, nmi M~. II. Al)proval o£Minules - October 27, 1997 Fhc minmcs of October 27, 1997 were approved (5-0) rifler motion by Mr. ilennct~ :,mt a sccm~d by Mr. Bcrg~nann. III. ()l)en lo lhe Public {'hairm:m Sp:ngna welcomed t..;tlcsts ill :lttclltt:lllcC illld asked il' :myonc wisht:d thc .,\utll~)ritv on matters other than thc ttpcoming public hearing. No public was received. Executive l)irector'.~ Roi)ntt Mr. Wnllacc advised the Authority that on l)cccmbcr 9, 1997, thc Ih~ard of Cmmty Commissioners adopted l~csolution No. 97-454 that opposes i louse I~ill 3185. tlB 3185 is a bill similar to thc one submitted last year Imrlaining tn margin reseme on thc pa~ of thc water and sewer indust~ and also fifll rccovco' of environment costs. All county managers in thc state xvcre advised of this action and a verbatim account of Resolution No. 97-454 by way of thc Florida Association of I.ocal Utility Regulalors (FALUR) newsletter. On J:muarv 14. i 998, Mr. Wallace addressed thc local legislative delegation regarding thc B('C's opposition to ! lB 3185. Also opposing lib 3 i 85 arc Sarasota, i lillslmrough. l:lnglcr, and Citrus Cotmties. Thc Florida Association of Counties was als~ sent copies of Resolution No. 97-454 opposing lib 3185. Mr. W~,llace noted that the Authority's next meeting is scheduled for Fclmmry 1998. At Ihal time staff'will present "Utility Regulation 1097 in Review". ('haimmn Spa~na r~(lUOSled thal Mr. Wallace arrange for a rcprcSClll;~live fl~e Smdh Florida Walcr Management District to address ~l~c Amlmri(v ;~ ;m upcoming meeting. Mr. Bergmalm specifically requested someone with thc km~wIcdge of agricullural vs. polablc walcr requirements. Nh'. Wallace briefed lite Aulhorily regarding thc City of Marco lsh,ml ;md llm Marco [shm(t Fair Water Rale Commitlcc attcmpls to establish a sp;2cial utilily district in order to acquire Florida Water. Several forums comhlctcd by Iht Fair Water Rate Committee have taken place and also a presentation lo thc N,larco ('it,,' Council regarding this issue. Thc Office o£ Utility Regulation has remained neutral itl this cfforl. Mr. Wallace made note that ifthe Marco Island Fair Walcr Ralc ('ommiltec did establish a special utility district, they would Imcomc a government entity, clecl a board of supervisors, and govern themselves. They would not be subject Io regulation by this Authority. The same applies Ir,) Ibc t ;ily of Marco Ishmd if they acquired the utility. Mr. Bergmann inquirc.i as Io thc percent:igc of regulatory fees Florida Water pays to Ihe County, wi,ich Mt'. Wallace responded was 80%. A brief discussion regarding this iss,le em;Lind. Items Requiring Aelion hy lite Aulhorily: A. Request to Table Staff Assisted Il. ate Case - North Marco Ut/[i~v Chaimmn Spagna requested Mr. Wallace address this issue. Mr. 'sVallace that on September 22, 1997 this Authority approved Norlh Marco Utililv fi)r a staff assisted rate case. Staff has been waiting since thai lime tm' thc ut~hty to mcct the mininmm filing requirements. Mr. Wallace spoke with Mr. Woodward in December, who at that time advised Mr. Wallace that 111¢ utility will be withdrawing their request for a staffassistcd rate case. Scvcr:,l d:~vs sl;tJ'f received a letter from the utility asking that the request for a slaft';msistcd rate case be tabled for six months. Mr. Wallace recommended that the Amhori~v withdraw approval for a staffassisled rate case for North Marco Utility Lmtil thc~ utility meets thc minimum filing requirements. At Ihat time, staffc;m bring Iht issue back before the Authority. After a briefdiscussion. Mr. Bennett moved to wilhdraw North Marco Ulility's rcqucsl for a staffassistcd rate case; sccomlcd Mr. $chroll. Motion passed unanimously (5-0). At this time, a Ich-minute recess was taken prior to thc 2:30 I'M lime tort:fin public hearing. II. 2:30 I'M Time Certain Pul}lie llcaring- Rookery Bay tJtililv's Response Io Show Cause Order No. SC-9701. Thc time ccrlain public hearing was brought lo order by Chaimlan Soagna at 2:30 I'M. Chaimmn Spagna confimmd that a proofofpuhlication of the notice of public hearing was sulmfittcd ,'u evidence. I)t. Spagna noted tile receipt ora loiter from Rookery Bay Utility's legal cmmscl San ford Martin, requesting a 45-day continuance of the show cause hem'ing. This written rcqucsl was not part of thc Authority's agenda packet duc ~o just being received. Mr. Palmer recommended thai Iht petitioners rot Ibc motion for 2 conthmanco present their case hot'ore tho ^uthority al this time. Mr. SanlSrd Ma~h], ruprcscnfing Rookcry Bay lJfil~ty, adviscd that thc molhm fi~r was sulmfiltcd jn[ntly by Rookery Bay iJfilhy and tho imrchascr of lhc utility. Rookery Bay Utility and the imrchascr have cnlcrcd into a COlltl';ICl dated Novcmhcr 21, 1997 for thc purchase and sale ortho asscls of thc utility. Mr. Martin advised thai a condilion of Iht agreement is that a ccdificatc oftransl~r hc applied for by thc partes and subsequent approval hy this Authority and thc Mr. Marlin described thc two wastowatcr treatment plants operated by Rookery Bay Utility; the 300,000 gallon per day treatment plant and Ibc Po~-au-Princc 6,000 gallons per day treatment plant. At Ibis time, both of these plants arc operating without a permit. Mr. Marlin advised thai in early .l:mu:u'y. Rookcr'v Bay I Jtilily agreed Io the lenns of Collier Counly ~or the conncclion of thc Port- au-Prince syslcm lo the County syslcm which would enable Rookery Bay Io decommission and abandon this small phmt and purchase Ircalmcnl services fi'mn Collier County. Mr. Martin advised that both parties are working diligcntly to comrlcte tile transaction bu! will nccd additional time 1o finalizc the sale. Thc rc. lucst for continuance is necessary in ordcr to complete thc ccrtificatc of iran;for alRt std~SCClUCnt sale of Iht utility. Mr. Marlin slated Ihat since late last smmncr when thc Florida I)epartnmnt of Environmental Protection issued ils final order denying Rookery Bay Utility an operating permit, Rookery Bay has attempted to negotiate with Collier County; however, thc County has expressed uo interest in acquiring assets or taking over Rookery Bay Utility. The only alternative was to sock a private purchaser. Two parties were interested in purchasing thc utility, however Rookery Bay decided on the local party for several reasons, two wllich :irc; a local purchaser is more knowledgeable with Collier County and more responsive to regulatory and governmental needs and has the financial resources and capabilit5' to correct long standing deficiencies of thc facilities. Mr. Marlin noted Ih:it ;liSt'} in attendance at today's public hearing are two representatives of thc purchasers, Mr. Mark Woodward, trustee of thc trust, and Mr. Tom Taylor o1'1 h)lc, Mimics Engineers. Mr. Bennett questioned if thc contract was Presented lo Rookery Bay 1 Jr il itl es in November '97, why has the Authority just today been presented with a request for a continuance. Mr. Martin responded by stating the comnlcxity :md details required in completing a sale of regulated assets. A I,ricfdiscussion ensued regarding acccssibility of routine inspections by Iht ('rarely l'olhition Control I)cpamncnt and tile ,qlale DF.i'. Mr. Mandy commented that his understanding from the ()ctobcr Authority meeting was that a commilmcnl was made that hy the next meeting there would be stone definite direction taken. Mr. Wallace reviewed thc actions taken by sl:fff amt thc f)EP prior to presenting the show cause order to thc Authority in Oclobcr. Mr. P, cnnett requested the identity of the prospective purchaser. At this time. Mr. Mark Woodward addressed the Authority. I lc displayed the contract hetwccn thc purchaser and Rookery Bay Utility. Ch:lirman Spagna inquired its to whether Mr. Wallace and staff had been supplied a copy of said contract. Mr. Woodward indicated that a complete disclosure of thc identity of the purchasers of thc utility ,,','ill be included with tile application for transfer. Mr. Woodward advised he would provide Mr. Wallace with a copy of the contract today. Mr. Woodward went on lo advise that llole, Montes Engineering fim~ would be operating the I'acility and have cmployccs that are certified to opcmtca waslcwalcr trcalmcnt pi;mt. Mr. Wnodward stated that thc purchascm am in thc carly stages nfduc diligence and have rcqucstcd a lot of information rcgarding thc purchase of thc utility. A lot of preliminary work has bccn completed to this iminl i.e. snrvcys. nbslr;~ct, crc. An Sg0,O00 dcposil has bccn placed in escrow Iownnl thc pm'ch;~sc nF Ro()kc~ Bay Utilily. Tom Taylor of llolc. Montes Engineers re[dressed thc Authority rcg;mling operational questions. Mr. Taylor advised that his lirm has been in contact with DEP regarding improvements and corrective actions ncccssa~ to bring thc utility back in compliance. Thc time frame of completion of tlmsc improvcmcnt would be a year plus. Chairman Spa§ne asked for a rcsprcscnlativc Cron] tile County's I'ul)lic l)cpamncnt to a(ldrcss thc Authority. Mr. Ed l lschncr, Public Works A(hninistrator, answcrc(! (ltmsli(ms Ikom thc Authority. Mr. Ilschncr advised Iht Authority that his office has been ncgolialing wilh Mr. SanFord M:min the Po~-au-Prince system Io access Ibc Counly regional system. All have been met and a bulk scmicc agreement is being drawn up. At this time, Mr. llschncr a(lviscd Ibc Authority that thc statement previously nlatlc n:ganling lack of interest on Iht pa~ of thc County lo puml]ase Rooke~ Bay l. Jtililv w:~... t()mIly correct. Thc County had inlcrcsl, however not to thc S4.2 milli(m I tlt,)lcd al that time. Chairman Spagna requested Mr. Andrew Baricnbrock from tile l')cl)arlmcnl nl Environmental Protection address Ihe Authority. Mr. Baricnbrock rcqueslcd I1~:~1 if the Anthority grants any continnance Io the ulility, to look at time frames, s/ncc flits is a process that is imperative to be handled relatively quickly. Mr. Schroll asked Mr. Barienbrock ifRookCry Bay had made any cffml m cx(,c~,i,,.., consent order or conscnt judgmcnt. Mr. Baricnbrock answered that there been no cftbrt in executing a consent order or a consent judgment, however thc DEl' has had contimfing contact with Mr. Taylor of Hole, Montes. Mr. Baricnbrock slated Ihat several maintenance and housekeeping ilcms conhl completed and implemented within 30 days to help bring the utility in compli:mce. Mr. Bcrgrnann asked iFany customers of Rookery Bay Utility wcrc in attend:race. Al this time, Mr. GaD' Toolc, attorney mprcscnting l'fimc Retail, addressed Authority. Mr. Toolc advised that Prime Retail owns the Coral Isle FactoD, Simps. Mr. Toolc presented thc Authority with a packet of inform~flion to b:~ck his slalClllCllts Ilia(lc today. I lc went on lo state that Prime Retail has catered an agreement for added si, acc at thc existing shopping center. On September I 1997, Prime Retail requested that Rooke~ Bay Ulility supply Ibcm with a letter of sca'icc availability. On September 24, 1997, Rookc~ Bay Utility responded Prime Retain that there was no problem with semice availability and to go ahead and move fonvard with their expansion. It was never divulged to Prime Retail that there was a problem with Rooke~ Bay Utility and the DEP. It w~m not until Prime Retail contacted DEP for a hookup pemfit that they fouml out that no additional hookup would be allowed until Rookc~ Bay comes in compliance with I)EP. Mr. Toole stated that it was not Prime Rctail's intent lo oppose thc sale of Rookc~ Bay to the prospective buyem. What they do oppose is a continuance. A continuance would delay his client's ability to fulfill their contract with ibc new shop and their March !'t opening date. Mr. Schroll ~kcd Mr. Palmer if it is within the scope of authority of this board to remove the Coral Isle shopping ccntcr from Rookery Bay's franchise are:l. Mr. Palmer responded that Ihcrc is ;~ procedure to enable lhis, however il would nol alleviate the lime problem thai I'rimc Retail is experiencing. Mr. l]ergnmnn asked Mr. Barienbrock I?~m~ thc I)EI' ir his dcpa~mcnt could allow connection off iht Confi Isle shopifing center with Rookc~ Bay prior to March I~s. Mr. Baricnbrock responded thal iFhis department had a purch:lscr in place and a.ncgotiatcd consent jttdgmcnt, then his dcl,artmcnt could authorize conncclion of this fi~cilily. 2 Mr. Wallace noted lhat lire Aulhorily's ncxl raffling is scheduled for I:cl~rt~ary 23. 1998. Mr. Wallace slalcd that it would be ncccssa~ for his office to have thc apldication for transfer in hand no later than l:cbma~ 10, 1997 in order to review and complete ncccasa~ staff actions hy Fcbnm~ 23'a. M r. Palmer asked if the i~rospcctive purchaser and Rookery Bay l. Itilits, bavc projected date as to when an application of transfer can be submitted to thc Authority. Mr. Martin responded that after discussion with Mr. Woodward Mr. Taylor, an application coukl be submitted Io thc office of Mr. Wallace by l:ebnmry I 0 With no fi~rthcr comments from tile public, Cbaim'mn Spagna closed thc i'mbh~ hearing and summed up ihe Authority's possible actions. Duc to further questions Io panics involved, Chainnan Spagna reopened thc rmblic hearing. Mr. Wallace advised that the DEl' may have a tcnlporary solution for the Coral lslc issue. Mr. Baricnbrock stated Ihat his office bas been irt contac~ with I'rimc Retail's engineers, Agnoli, Barber, and Bmndage and reviewed with them a temporary solution of d.'fily removal of wastcwatcr from the manhole until thc February 23''~ Aulbority meeting. Again, Chairman Spagna closed tire public bearing. Discussion entailed regarding holding a special meeting in lwo wcck.~ after thc applicalion for transfer is received by staffon February 10, 1998. Mr. Mandy asked if this time frame would be agreeable Io l'fimc Retail. Mr. 'l'oolc inlroduccd l'rimc Rclail's engineer, Mr. Dan Bnmdage. Mr. l~rundagc answered several questions from the Authority regarding temperaW I~tmq~ing of wastcw:~lcr from Iht new shop al Coral Isle. Mr. Tim Clemens, Wastexw~ter l)ircctor for Collier County addressed Ihe Authority. Mr. Clemor~s stated that the County did bare facilities in front of Coral Isle shopping center could connect to. Chairman Spagna asked for a motion lo close lire public bearing. Tho ne)riehl was made by Mr. Schroll with a second by Mr. Bcrgmann. A motion was made by Mr. BcnHcII lo continue tile show cause public hcarin.v. until l"ebruary I 1, 1998 at 2:00 i'M; motion seconded by Mr. Scbroll. Mothm passed (4-1 ) with Mr. Mandy disscnling. Aulhorily Members Discussion None Adjournme~l Mr. Bennett moved lo adjourn thc mccting; seconded by Mr. Mandy, Mr. Bcrgmann and Mr. Schroll. Adjoummcnt at 3:45 PM. COIA.IER COUNTY WATER AND WASTEWATER AUTIlORITY Minutes of Meeting Board Meeting Room 3rd Floor, AdministratiOn Building 2:00 PM, Februar)., I I, 1998 A video record of the following proceedings is on file with the Office of Utility Regulation, Suite 203, Administration Building, County Government Center', 3301 E. Tamiami Trail, Naples, Florida 34112, Phone (941) 774-8577. Assistant County Attorney Thomas C. Palmer was present to provide lcgal advice to th~: Authority and Utility Regulation Manager D. E. "Bleu" Wallace was present, to reprcscn! the Office of Utility Regulation. !. Call to Order (Determination of Quorum). il. Ill. Thc meeting was called to order by Chairman Spagna at 2:00 PM. Authority members prcscnt were; Chairman Ncno J. Spagna, Vice-Chairman Richard F. Bcrgmann, Mr. Gcorgc J. Schroll, and Mr. Joseph A. Mandy, constituting a quorum. Mr. Bennett was absent. Approval of Minutes - January, 26, 1998. Thc minutes o£ thc January 26. 1998 Authority niccting wcrc approved (4-0) after motion by Mr. Schroll and a second by Mr. Bcrgmann. Open to the Public Chairman Spagna wclconied guests iii attendance and asked if anyone wished to address the Authority on matters other than the upcoming pvblic hearing. No public comment was received. At this time, Chairman Spagna called a 15 minute recess in order that Authority members are given an opportunity to review the recently received material regarding the upcoming public hearing. Also during the recess, Mr. Robert C. Bennett arrived for the meeting. Chairman Spagna reconvened the meeting at 2:25 PM. IV. Continued Public Hearing from January 26, 1998 Rookery. Bay Utility, inc. Chairman Spagna requested Mr. Wallace give a short presentation on the events leading up to this public hearing. Mr. Wallace reviewed the series ofevents regarding Rookery Bay Utility ending with the receipt of the application of transfer at 4:30 PM on Tuesday, February 10, 1998. The application was reviewed by staff and it was determined that the minimum filing requirements were met and that the application is sufficient to serve as thc vehicle to affect a transfer of certificate. Mr. Wallace advised the Authority that representatives were present from the investment group, Rookery Bay Utility, thc Department of Environmental Protection, the Health Department, and staffshot, kt thc At, thori:y have any questions. At this time, Chairman Spagna invited anyone from the audience to address the Au;hority regarding this matter. Mr. Sanford Martin, Attorney for Rookery Bay Utility, Inc. addressed the Authority. Mr. Martin advised the Authority that Rookery Bay Utility gives their consent and joins in the application submitted. Mr. Martin asked the Authority to waive the $5,000 application fee which is part of the minimum fil[qg requirement. Rookery Bay Utility is in agreement to pay the cost incurred in advertising the public hearing. Mr. Martin asked that the transferor, Rookery Bay Utility and the transferee, Rookery Bay Services, Inc. be given additional time to close out the transaction upon approval of the certificate of transfer. Mt'. Don Pickworth representing Prime'Retail, owners of Coral Isle Shops addressed the Authority. Mr. Pickworth briefly reviewed his client's interest in this matter. Mr. Pickworth advised the'Authority of Prime Retail's support of staff's recommendation regarding the transfer. However, they have a timing issue as discussed at the previous Authority meeting. Chairman Spagna asked Mr. Pickworth if Prime Retail has been in contact with thc DEP regarding their a temporary solution to their connection issue. Mr. Pickworth advised that they have had a number ofdiscussions with DEP however they have not been given a conclusive answer to their concerns. The engineer for the Coral Isle Shops, Mr. Dan Brundage of Agnoli, Barber, and Brundage addressed the Authori:y regarding a temporary solution to the connection issue. Mr. Mark Woodward, representing Rookery Bay Services, Inc., advised the Authority that the deadline of submittal of the application for transfer of certificate was met. He also stated that if any further documentation is necessary to meet the minimum filing requirement, he would be happy to see that staff received them. Mr. Woodward also requested that the $5,000 application fee be waived. Again, it was stated that they were in agreement to pay the costs for advertising ortho public hearing. Mr. Bergmann inquired as to the future of the 160 2 existing Rookery Bay utility plant. Mr. Woodward advised that the plant would be operated by Hole, Montes Engineers. Mr. Wallace stated that there is an issue regarding rate base. Is thc transferee going to request an acquisition adjustment? Mr. Wallace advised that tile only time a party can adjust rate base for an acquisition adjustment is during a full'rate review. Mr. Mandy asked iflhe purchaser, Mr. Ferrao was present. Mr. Woodward stated that he was not present. Mr Mandy asked if he had a local address, to which Mr. Woodward responded, 4001 Tamiami Trail, N., Suite 350, Naples, Florida. ChaitTnan Spagna asked to hear from Mr. Andrew Baricnbrock of thc DEP regarding the Coral Isle Shops connection issue. Mr. Barienbrock advised that thc DEP is waiting until February 23''~ when this Authority makes their decision. *lt. Barienbrock stated that the DEP was in agreement with staffs rcco'nmcndations regarding the application for transfer of certificate. Mr. Bergmann asked to hear from the engineer who will he operating RookeD' Bay Utility after the transfer. Mr. Tom Taylor with Hole, Montes & Associates Engineers answered questions from tile Authority regarding repairs and maintenance to thc current facility. Mr. Schroll comnlcnted as to the waiver of the S5,000 application fcc. Chairman Spagna advised that iftlle applicalion fcc is accepted, any monies left over after advertising expenses were recouped would have to be refunded to the Utility. Mr. Wallace advised that advertising expenses are estimated to be between $100 and $200. Mr. Wallace requested thc Authority act on each indMdual staff recommendation presented to thc Authority. Chairman Spagna requested information from the purchaser to assure the Authority of their financial resources. He requested a financial report be presented to the Authority by their February 23ra meeting. Mr. Bennett asked if anyone present could give a biographical sketch of Mr. Fcrrao. Mr. Woodv,'ard answered that thc application did not require any personal information be provided on the prospective buyer. Mr. Woodward advised that Mr. Ferrao is a local businessman who is thc owner ora corporation that develops high rises in Pelican Bay. Mr. Ferrao is involved in real estate investments currently on Marco Island and Isles of Capri. He is also an investor in the Fiddler's Creek project on S.R. 951. Mr. Mandy asked for an estimated time frame for the utility plant to come into compliance. Mr. Taylor of Hole, Montes responded to this question by stating that the facility was not in as bad a state as previously felt, and only minor repairs and maintenance issues would have to be addressed. This ofcourse excludes the Port-au-Prince plant. Mr. Mandy asked for the DEP's response to the above. Mr. Baricnbrock advised that Mr. Taylor's analogy was a good assessment of thc current situation. Item #1: Mr. Wallace requested that item #1 be date and time certain for March 23, ! 998 for 2:00 PM, for the show cause public hearing for Rookery Bay Utility, Inc. Mr. Bcrgmann made a motion to accept staff's recommendation regarding item #I; seconded by Mr. Schroll. Motion passed unanimously (5-0). item #2: Direct staffto advertise and schedule the transfer of certificate to be heard by thc Authority at it's next regularly scheduled meeting of February 23, 1998 at 2:00 PM. Mr. Bennett moved to approve the above; seconded by Mr. Schroll. Motion passed unanimously (5-0). Item #3: Authorize staffto draft a letter to Mr. Barienbrock of thc DEP requesting reconsideration to allow thc connection of the Prime Ret,ail Coral Isle Shops to the wastewater system. Mr. Pickworth, representing Prime Retail requested that their concerns and requests be put in writing to the DEP. Mr. Bennett moved to direct staffto draft a letter to the DEP; seconded by Mr. Schroll. Motion passed (5-0). Item #4: Waiver ofthe $5,000 application fee in excess ofadvcrtising costs. Mr. Bennett moved to approve; seconded by Mr. Schroll. Motion passed (5-0). At this time, Chairman Spagna closed the public heating. Authority Members Discussion None Adjournment Mr. Schroli moved to adjourn the meeting; seconded by Mr. Bennett.