Loading...
Agenda 02/09/2016 Item #17A Proposed Agenda Changes Board of County Commissioners Meeting February 9,2016 Add On Item 10B: Recommendation to consider North Collier Fire Control and Rescue District's response to the County's settlement proposal regarding the provision of Advanced Life Support(ALS)Services in the District. (Commissioner's Fiala's request) Move Item 16A6 to Item 11D: Recommendation to approve and enter into a License Agreement with Naples Community Hospital,Inc.(NCH)for the purpose of the installation of two ground signs within County road right-of-way. (Commissioner Henning's request) Withdraw Item 16A9: Recommendation to approve a Hold Harmless and Indemnity Agreement,and Payment Bond in the amount of$343,991.09 in lieu of the required Final Waiver of Liens from the Utility Contractor for the preliminarily acceptance of the water and sewer facilities associated with Tamiami Crossings Shopping Center,PL20160000023. (Staff's request) Move Item 16D4 to Item 11E: Recommendation to approve a substantial amendment and subrecipient agreement presented by the Division of Community and Human Services for a project previously approved in the FY 2015-16 Action Plan for the Community Development Block Grant Program. This item has no new fiscal impact. (Commissioner Fiala's request) Continue Item 16F5 to the February 23,2016 BCC Meeting: Recommendation to award ITB 15-6522- Tourist Fulfillment Services to Phase V of Florida,LLC.and make a finding that this item promotes tourism. (Staff's request) Move Item 17A to Item 9B: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item,all participants are required to be sworn in.Recommendation to(1) approve Ordinance No.2004-41,as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code,which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County,Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Agricultural(A)zoning district and the Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)zoning district for a 106.67±acre parcel to be known as the Rockedge RPUD to allow up to 266 dwelling units on property located near the northeast corner of the intersection of Sabal Palm Road and Collier Boulevard in Section 23,Township 50 South,Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida; providing for repeal of Ordinance No.06-31,the former Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development; and providing an effective date [Petition PUDRPL20150002246].and(2)terminate agreement authorizing Affordable Housing Density Bonus and Imposing Covenants and Restrictions on Real Property. (Commissioner Henning's request) Time Certain Items Item 9A to be heard at 9:30 a.m.,immediately followed by Item 9B 2/9/2016 9:24 AM 2/9/2016 17.A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commissioner members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to (1) approve Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Agricultural (A) zoning district and the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a 106.67± acre parcel to be known as the Rockedge RPUD to allow up to 266 dwelling units on property located near the northeast corner of the intersection of Sabal Palm Road and Collier Boulevard in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; providing for repeal of Ordinance No. 06-31, the former Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development; and providing an effective date [Petition PUDR- PL20150002246] and (2) terminate agreement authorizing Affordable Housing Density Bonus and Imposing Covenants and Restrictions on Real Property. OBJECTIVE: To have the Board of County Commissioners (Board)review staff's findings and recommendations along with the recommendations of the Collier County Planning Commission (CCPC) regarding the above referenced petition and render a decision regarding this Planned Unit Development Rezone petition; and ensure the project is in harmony with all the applicable codes and regulations in order to ensure that the community's interests are maintained CONSIDERATIONS: The original Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD), consisting of 76.46± acres, allowed multi-family dwellings with a density of 5.3 units per acre. The petitioner proposes to add an additional 32± acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) into the Rockedge RPUD. The petitioner is also proposing to remove the affordable housing component (A Board of County Commissioner approved affordable housing termination agreement is required concurrent with this PUD approval), with 106 units derived from Transfer of Development Rights (TDR), decrease the density to 2.5 units per acre, allowing 266 units on 106.67± acres. The proposed development units are revised to allow multi-family, townhomes, duplexes, single-family attached, single-family detached, and single-family detached (zero lot line). COMMUNITY AND HUMAN SERVICES (CHS): This is a request is to amend the Rockedge RPUD approved in 2006 through Ordinance 06-31. The project's density was derived from URF base density and an Affordable Housing Density bonus, with the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement(AHDBA)approved as part of the RPUD in 2006. This amendment to the Rockedge PUD would include the removal a total of 111 affordable housing units, targeted for individuals who are at or below 80% of Area Median Income. On June 23, 2015, the Board of County Commissioners approved agenda item #11D, which states, in part,the following: "From time to time, the developers/applicants request a PUD amendment which can include a reduction or elimination of previously approved affordable/workforce housing units; whether via an approved Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement, or by other means. While the Board Packet Page-1116- 2/9/2016 17.A. will retain its authority to amend PUD's as allowed by the Land Development Code, it is recommended that the Board retain affordable/workforce housing units. This would contribute to a higher level of affordable/workforce housing in our community." Based on this direction, CHS would recommend denying the request to terminate the affordable housing density bonus agreement for the Rockedge PUD. However, since the Board also retained its authority to amend PUD's as allowed by the Land Development Code on a case by case basis, several factors should be considered for this request. The following are key points that should be considered in determining the approval or denial of the termination agreement: - The Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement is a voluntary agreement - The development has not yet begun - No benefits have been realized as a result of the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement - The applicant is requesting to revert to a base density, as allowed by the Land Development Code - Fewer number of units are now being requested, with additional acreage added to the development,resulting in less impact to the surrounding infrastructure If the BCC should decide to terminate the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement, the following provisions concerning the termination of the agreement apply, according to Section 15 "Modification"of Agreement: tTh "This Agreement shall be modified or amended only by the written agreement of both Parties." A termination agreement has been drafted for execution, contingent upon Board approval, in order to fulfill the request of the applicant. FISCAL IMPACT: The County collects impact fees prior to the issuance of building permits to help offset the impacts of each new development on public facilities. These impact fees are used to fund projects identified in the Capital Improvement Element of the Growth Management Plan as needed to maintain the adopted Level of Service (LOS) for public facilities. Additionally, in order to meet the requirements of concurrency management, the developer of every local development order approved by Collier County is required to pay a portion of the estimated Transportation Impact Fees associated with the project in accordance with Chapter 74 of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Other fees collected prior to issuance of a building permit include building permit review fees. Finally, additional revenue is generated by application of ad valorem tax rates, and that revenue is directly related to the value of the improvements. Please note that impact fees and taxes collected were not included in the criteria used by staff and the Planning Commission to analyze this petition. GROWTH MANAGEMENT IMPACT: The Growth Management Plan (GMP) is the prevailing document to support land use decisions such as this proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment (PUDA) application. Staff is required to make a recommendation regarding a finding of consistency or inconsistency with the overall GMP as part of the recommendation for • approval, approval with conditions, or denial of any rezoning petition. A finding of consistency with the Future Land Use Element and the Future Land Use Map designation is a portion of the Packet Page -1117- 2/9/2016 17.A. overall finding that is required, and staff believes the petition is consistent with the Collier County GMP as discussed in the attached Collier County Planning Commission Staff Report. Staff believes that the proposed Amendment may also be found consistent with the Future Land Use Element, GMP Transportation Element and the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Therefore, zoning staff recommends that the petition be found consistent with the goals, objective and policies of the overall GMP. LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS: This is a PUD Rezone. The burden falls upon the applicant to prove that the proposal is consistent with all of the criteria set forth below. The burden then shifts to the BCC, should it consider denial, that such denial is not arbitrary, discriminatory or unreasonable. This would be accomplished by finding that the amendment does not meet one or more of the listed criteria. Criteria for PUD Rezones Ask yourself the following questions. The answers assist you in making a determination for approval or not. 1. Consider: The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer,water, and other utilities. 2. Is there an adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of agreements, contract, or other instruments or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense? Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the County Attorney. 3. Consider: Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. 4. Consider: The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. 5. Is there an adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development? 6. Consider: The timing or sequence of development (as proposed) for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. 7. Consider: The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. 8. Consider: Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Packet Page -1118- 2/9/2016 17.A. 9. Will the proposed change be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the Growth Management Plan? 10. Will the proposed PUD Rezone be appropriate considering the existing land use pattern? 11. Would the requested PUD Rezone result in the possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts? 12. Consider: Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. 13. Consider: Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. 14. Will the proposed change adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood? 15. Will the proposed change create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety? 16. Will the proposed change create a drainage problem? 17. Will the proposed change seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas? 18. Will the proposed change adversely affect property values in the adjacent area? 19. Will the proposed change be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations? 20. Consider: Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. 21. Are there substantial reasons why the property cannot ("reasonably") be used in accordance with existing zoning? (a"core"question...) 22. Is the change suggested out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county? 23. Consider: Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. 24. Consider: The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. 25. Consider: The impact of development resulting from the proposed PUD rezone on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County Growth Management Plan and as defined and Packet Page -1119- 2/9/2016 17.A. implemented through the Collier County Adequate Public Facilities Ordinance [Code ch.106, art.II], as amended. 26. Are there other factors, standards, or criteria relating to the PUD rezone request that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health, safety, and welfare? 27. The Board must base its decision upon the competent, substantial evidence presented by the written materials supplied to it, including but not limited to the Staff Report, Executive Summary, maps, studies, letters from interested persons and the oral testimony presented at the BCC hearing as these items relate to these criteria. The proposed Ordinance was prepared by the County Attorney's Office. This item has been approved as to form and legality. An affirmative vote of four is required for Board approval. (HFAC) COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION (CCPC) RECOMMENDATION: The CCPC heard this petition on December 3, 2015 and found that the criteria of Section 10.02.08.F and 10.02.13.B.5 were met. A motion was made by Commissioner Assaad, seconded by Commissioner Homiak, and by a unanimous vote (7 to 0) the CCPC forwarded this petition to the BCC with a recommendation of approval of the attached PUD Ordinance. No correspondence in opposition to this petition has been received, no one spoke at the CCPC hearing in opposition to the project and the CCPC vote was unanimous. Therefore, this petition has been placed on the Summary Agenda. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff concurs with the recommendations of the CCPC and further recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Rockedge PUD Rezone, subject to the attached PUD Ordinance, and recommends termination of the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Prepared By: Daniel James Smith, AICP, Principal Planner, Planning & Zoning Division, Growth Management Department Attachments: 1. Ordinance 2. Staff Report with backup htt•://www.collier•ov.net/ft•/2016BDCMeetin•s/A•endaFeb0916/Growth •rnt/ 9A-PUDR-PL20150002246-Rockedge-RPUD.pdf 3. Termination Agreement 4. Legal Advertisement Packet Page-1120- 2/9/2016 17.A. COLLIER COUNTY Board of County Commissioners Item Number: 17.17.A. Item Summary: This item requires that ex parte disclosure be provided by Commission members. Should a hearing be held on this item, all participants are required to be sworn in. Recommendation to (1) approve Ordinance No. 2004-41,as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code,which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Agricultural (A)zoning district and the Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD) zoning district for a 106.67±acre parcel to be known as the Rockedge RPUD to allow up to 266 dwelling units on property located near the northeast corner of the intersection of Sabal Palm Road and Collier Boulevard in Section 23,Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida; providing for repeal of Ordinance No.06-31,the former Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development; and providing an effective date [Petition PUDRPL20150002246]. and (2)terminate agreement authorizing Affordable Housing Density Bonus and Imposing Covenants and Restrictions on Real Property. Meeting Date: 2/9/2016 Prepared By Name: SmithDaniel Title: Planner,Principal,Zoning 1/7/2016 10:54:44 AM Approved By Name: BosiMichael Title: Division Director-Planning and Zoning,Zoning Date: 1/12/2016 7:48:55 AM Name: PuigJudy Title: Operations Analyst, Operations&Regulatory Management Date: 1/13/2016 9:38:59 AM Name: PuigJudy Title: Operations Analyst,Operations&Regulatory Management Date: 1/13/2016 9:39:41 AM Packet Page-1121- 2/9/2016 17.A. Name:BellowsRay Title: Manager-Planning,Zoning Date: 1/13/2016 3:00:51 PM Name: AshtonHeidi Title: Managing Assistant County Attorney, CAO Land Use/Transportation Date: 1/14/2016 10:18:11 AM Name: MarcellaJeanne Title: Executive Secretary,Transportation Administration Date: 1/20/2016 1:20:08 PM Name: IsacksonMark Title: Division Director-Corp Fin&Mgmt Svc, Office of Management&Budget Date: 1/22/2016 11:01:35 AM Name: KlatzkowJeff Title: County Attorney, Date: 1/29/2016 9:59:35 AM Name: CasalanguidaNick Title: Deputy County Manager, County Managers Office Date: 2/1/2016 11:10:16 AM Packet Page -1122- 2/9/2016 17.A. ORDINANCE NO. 16- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT AND THE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A 106.44± ACRE PARCEL TO BE KNOWN AS THE ROCKEDGE RPUD TO ALLOW UP TO 266 DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF SABAL PALM ROAD AND COLLIER BOULEVARD IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 06-31, THE FORMER ROCKEDGE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PETITION PUDR-PL20150002246] WHEREAS, Patrick Vanasse, AICP of RWA, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of COLEMAN YOVANOVICH & KOESTER, P.A. representing Waterman at Rockedge Naples, LLC, (hereinafter "owner" or "developer) petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: ZONING CHANGE. The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida is changed from the Agricultural (A) zoning district and the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a 106.44± acre parcel to be known as the Rockedge RPUD in accordance with Exhibits A through H attached hereto and [15-CPS-01429/1233094/1] 128 1 oft Rockedge PUDA/PUDA-PL20140002246 1/13/16 ' Packet Page -1123- 2/9/2016 17.A. incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance No. 2004-41, as amended, the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: REPEAL OF ORDINANCE. Ordinance No. 06-31 is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida,this day of , 2016. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: - Deputy Clerk DONNA FIALA,Chairwoman Approved as to form and legality: t3 L Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A—Permitted Uses Exhibit B—Development Standards Exhibit C—Master Plan Exhibit D—Legal Description Exhibit E—List of Requested Deviations Exhibit F—List of Developer Commitments Exhibit G—Archaelogical Site Locations Exhibit H—Typical Section 50' R.O.W. [15-CPS-01429/1233094/1] 128 2 of 2 Rockedge PUDA/PUDA-PL20140002246 1/13/16 Packet Page-1124- 2/9/2016 17.A. EXHIBIT A Rockedge Planned Unit Development Regulations for development of the Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Ordinance and applicable sections of the Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of approval of each development order. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. MAXIMUM DENSITY: There shall be no more than 266 residential dwelling units permitted on the± 106.44 gross acres, resulting in a maximum density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre. This PUD allows a base density of 1.5 units per acre or 160 dwelling units, and pursuant to the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict provisions of the Growth Management Plan, an additional 106 units are derived from Transfer of Development Rights(TDR). Redemption of TDR credits shall be per LDC Section 2.03.07.D.4(g). PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: I. GENERAL PERMITTED USES Guardhouses, gatehouses, access control structures, clock towers, fences, walls, columns, decorative hardscaping or architectural embellishments associated with the project's entrance features are permitted within the "R" designated area abutting the project's entrance,or within the private roadway as depicted on the PUD Master Plan,and shall have no required setbacks; however, such structures cannot be located where they create vehicular stacking or sight distance issues for motorists and pedestrians,and cannot exceed 35' in actual height. II. RESIDENTIAL A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family,detached 2. Single family, attached 3. Single family,zero lot line 4. Townhouse Page 1 of 16 12-09-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 Packet Page-1125- 2/9/2016 17.A. EXHIBIT A Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 5. Multi-family 6. Temporary model homes 7. Model sales center 8. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA")or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to swimming pools, spas,screen enclosures, private garages,and other recreational facilities. 2. Gatehouses and other access control structures. 3. Utility and water management facilities 4. Walls,berms, and signs. 5. Project sales, construction and administrative offices that may occur in residential and/or temporary structures. 6. Passive open space uses and structures, such as but not limited to landscaped areas,gazebos,park benches and walking trails. 7. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. III. RECREATION AREA A. Principal Uses: 1. Structures intended to provide social and recreational space for the private use of the residents and their guests. 2. Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis and basketball courts, playgrounds, pedestrian/bicycle pathways, and water features. Page 2 of 16 12-09-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 Packet Page -1126- i 2/9/2016 17.A. EXHIBIT A Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 3. Passive open space uses and structures, such as but not limited to landscaped areas, gazebos,park benches and walking trails. 4. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA")or Hearing Examiner,as applicable. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Community maintenance areas,maintenance structures and community storage areas. 2. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA")or Hearing Examiner,as applicable. IV. PRESERVE AREA A. Permitted Uses: 1. Native preserves 2. Uses and structures that will not reduce the native preservation requirements, such as boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos, benches and viewing platforms, subject to approval by the permitting agencies and in accordance with the LDC. 3. Drainage and water management structures that will not reduce the native preservation requirement. 4. Any other conservation use or structure which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses, within a preserve, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA")or Hearing Examiner,as applicable. 5. Activities in the archaeological areas within the Preserve shall be in accordance with Exhibit F and the LDC. Page 3 of 16 12-09-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 Packet Page -1127- 2/9/2016 17.A. ■ EXHIBIT B -....„, Rockedge Planned Unit Development DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for the RPUD Residential Subdistrict and Recreation Area Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of the applicable development order. DEVELOPMENT SINGLE SINGLE DUPLEX& TOWNHOUSE MULTI- RECREATION STANDARDS FAMILY FAMILY TWO- FAMILY DETACHED8 ATTACHED& FAMILY8 SINGLE FAMILY ZERO LOT LINE8 ViiA6ii,::' &,4,,,.4,46,iiii",, .rgit!t_ ,11,1ctligr4V,Irl-lg:: Nnli, - -rms:'.1a4A' -', sal!!,H,P1,:qr-dic- 40-34e :''.4-44.,,U0;i;.2VFtg18.*ilV;V::.,-:%';- '=0Ai' :::!;gf-','-..~.z4EiNkY-lNj'-PLi:!":-...:..f':.:,'..:.:,:,',:V.-rz.,---: ::,',r,-''-"?.R: '':,;AW:.$-':', ':'-'.'i..V:!-- -,;.,:+.,--,g;:::Avf;k::;I.V;:iqART :;; •:t:43"T.A.ro,'!-,:-..‘.:,!9,:i.swi,,,',... ..x.:.!:-,-,...:5,:l&Foitive:::. ,1111i:ii.,,,,,,,,---°1-.,,.!Y,,:.f:c..:!-,',1,""Q=A441,h401;4:i'.,,Te,:;!:-.',.;:;.:‘,.; MINIMUM LOT AREA 3,500 S.F. 1,600 S.F. PER / N/A 4,000 S.F. 3,500 S.F. NA NA . PER UNIT UNIT MIN. LOT WIDTH ' 40 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 16 FEET N/A N/A MIN. FRONT YARD 2,3 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET MIN.SIDE YARD 5 FEET 0 OR10 FEET 0 AND 5 FEET 0 AND 5 FEET 10 FEET 1/2 BH MIN.REAR YARD 6'7 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MIN.PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 10 FEET 10 FEET 0 OR 10 FEET 0 OR 10 FEET 20 FEET 1/2 sum of the BH STRUCTURES MAX. ZONED BUILDING 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 45 FEET 35 FEET HEIGHT MAX.ACTUAL BUILDING 55 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET HEIGHT 4004.10V/SPONTOREk:. :- . ...:w • titi,:..,4t:46,c4i.=. -i.:"„!*:,..:„..-:: :;i2i,:'_;:.4, .=„:::;,4,',,::.=.--4:=_ -,;4,4.-. .f.:.4"ii„.,&.„4:::• ..''',',:: :::::•:.-1,v:.:H.,:.;.:-.',::::4,',.1:a.i.g..i.::.. .:'.'"f.....:...::::::,,... : .. -..,3:::::,-,::::, :,..K:::::_-:_;.17-.:. -, ,Fzlig::7:::::,,,.„...::: MIN.FRONT YARD S i:4 ::. PS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS MIN.SIDE YARD4 SPS SPS SPS5 SPS5 SPS SPS MIN. REAR YARD 6,7 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 0 FEET MIN. PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MAX.ZONED BUILDING 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET HEIGHT MAX.ACTUAL BUILDING 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET HEIGHT 61-1: Building Height(zoned height] SPS:Same as Principal Structure i ,...-... Page 4 of 16 12-09-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 Packet Page -1128- 2/9/2016 17.A. EXHIBIT B Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 1. The minimum lot width may be reduced by 20% on pie-shaped lots„ provided the minimum lot area requirement shall be maintained. 2. For multi-family product the front yard setbacks shall be measured from back of curb,or edge of pavement if not curbed. For all other unit types, front yard setbacks shall be measured from ROW line. The minimum 15' front yard setback may be reduced to 12'where the unit has a recessed or side-entry garage. Front-loading garages shall be set back a minimum of 23 feet from edge of sidewalk. 3. For corner lots, only 1 front yard setback shall be required. The yard that does not contain the driveway shall provide a minimum 12'setback. 4. The minimum distance between accessory buildings may be reduced to 0'where attached garages are provided. However, the principal structures shall maintain a 10'minimum separation. 5. Accessory pool cage setbacks may be reduced to 0 feet when attached to a common privacy wall. 6. If single family development is pursued through the County's plat process,LMEs and LBEs will be platted as separate tracts. 7. When a lot abuts a lake maintenance easement (LME)or landscape buffer easement (LBE),the minimum rear yard shall be measured from the easement.Otherwise,the minimum rear yard shall be measured from the parcel boundaries. 8. In order to support a canopy tree with a minimum 20-foot crown spread as required in LDC Section 4.06.05, individual lots must accommodate enough space for the entire 20-foot canopy to be located wholly within the lot boundaries,except where the lot is adjacent to a lake maintenance easement and/or landscape buffer easement,in which case,a portion of the required 20-foot canopy may protrude into such area. 9. For the southern boundary of the RA tract excluding the area encumbered by an FPL easement,a 6-foot wall shall be provided in combination with the required 15-foot type B landscape buffer.For the southern boundary of the RA tract encumbered by the FPL easement,a 15-foot type B landscape buffer shall be required to the eastern edge of the paved area of owner's parking lot,subject to FPL approval. Page 5 of 16 12-09-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 Packet Page -1129- 2/9/2016 17.A. EXHIBIT C f"—■ Rockedge Planned Unit Development ROCKEDGE • LEGEND ,, ZONING:TTRVC CURRENT LAND USE: RPUD MASTER PLAN R RESIDENTIAL RV PARK ... . ._ _ RA RECREATIONAL • 1 ;MRCS ROAO _ _ -- , AREA 1 1 p PRESERVE OPERT PR RY -\ rim 1 TRAFFIC FLOW BOUNDAY •I I -- • I il I --..- PATTERN I• I I Ci) DEVIATIONS '.! I is.rfpf INA, ZONING: I II-/-,F• V*BUFFER "••I",t4II I I A-AGRICULTURAL PAII4Vir 2CII WATER I -40• ME • 'IIIII=.41 MANAGEMENT LAKE (SCATTERED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) Pexa I ' ,,,,..,, ARCHAEOLOGICAL w.T. AREA t , , . WANT,/RD ESMT.& ,--5.DRAINAGE SWALE 125MT, alb I 1 friPrd I I- .,1 PRESERVE AGMA1NT REEMENT &MAAR.AGREEMEW OA. I OA 2526 PG 2485 2826 PG.2435 ,,, 1,,,,r, 1;Iit 1 E-J BOUNDARY MARKER i'k t _____J 1‘,-,....,o.... '--:-.----- -----...--..,..._- _._ _ , „I , 1_ , , 15'TYPE Tr BUFFER 1511,PE R 'Er BUFFER . .., LAND USE SUMMARY MCNAIR ROUT OP WAY „, TRACT LAND USE ACREAGE - - 15'TYPE - - • % TRACT'Fr RESIDENTIAL 58.43.4-AC RA . d I 1 ll R. 'Er BUFFER _1 w TRACr7 PRESERVE 24.2D+I-AC — ---- --- '-' " — — 7 t TRACT'RR RECREATION AREA I I 0.91+/-AC 1 tt21 TRACT L' LAKE/WATER MATTAGEMENT 10.26+1.AC ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE L m ACCESS DRIVE/R.O.W. 12114+/-AC a , i Ibi I CURRENT 0 USE:SINGLE FAMILY 115'Pox 108.44 41-AC > t RES! VACANT LAND 112 •• I; I III MAXIMUM DENSITY TYPE PROPERTY BOUNDARY-,,, I 1 I ..q •-•Ft3;511U. FFER 288 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS 5 ; _ . 180 DWELLING UNITS DERIVED FROM R I el --... R •fr BUFFER I DENSITe;108 FROM TDR'S 43 I I ) I RPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES I i ii 40 ' I ,-PROPERTY 1.79'FPL THE"sm an I 1.WITHIN RPUD BOUNDARIES THERE WILL BE 'EY BUFFER—-- ----. / BOUNDARY . --- K----r- A MINIMUM OF ED%OPEN SPACE. R f egillai9 I ZONING:A- PG,1765 2.THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN I KIWIIIITTIII1lIfitI1 '• " AGRICULTURE ON THIS PUD MASTER PLAN SHALL BE W-ide41400:14:1:1 . , . 20.440A,i10;p0e.I.1 I CURRENT LAND USE: CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. ME :,*,,,,_ 'l SINGLE FAMILY ! 1 p (D 1 b,.'leit„AlgtrAnTiq.#6 RESIDENTIAL,VACANT 3.THE DESIGN,LOCATION,AND CONFIGURATION LAND i 1 OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE I DEFINED AT EITHER PRELIMINARY ' .■ , I ' n SUBDIVISION PLAT APPROVAL,OR I I• II II -.-I-10'TYPE 15 TYPE , , I II W BUFFEA ir BUFFER CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL. ,.•• ,... 1 I; 15'TYPE ' i •D•BUFFER NITAL FUTURE 4.REQUIRED PRESERVE:2129 AC(25%OF 85.17 41.. -P .„ . .".....- OTE ;1 INTERCONNECTION i' i AC Of EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION, II t (.-\ t I ZONING:A• AGRICULTURAL a ' ' PRESERVE PROVIDED:24.20 AC 5. BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION(S)TO t I f \ CURRENT LAND USE: i!. THE MULTI-USE PATH ALONG COWER . ! ur TYPE NURSERY ,3.5,RAY I BOULEVARD W MARA MAY BE PROVIDED AT TIME OF PPL OR SDP. PG.us 11 1 PROPERTY PROPERTY BOUNDARY ■ : I BOUNDARY ZONING;A-AGRICULTURAL/MELROSE ROW TEAsEm° MAIN 'i B. MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFERING in . REQUIREMENTS MAY BE MET WITH EXISTING , . 1 , •i ......_. CURRENT LAND UM NURSERY ; L PRESERVE.WHERE THE PRESERVE DOES NOT ' " ' ' . . ', MEET THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFERING : , zOttirie:ptio,varaliild CYPRESS -- --- -: REQUIREMENTS,PLANTING TO MEET THESE I CURIEENT LAND USE;RESIDENTIAL.,VERONA 13 REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE REQUIRED. e .. . Pao pm...col*sat .1.06.0 AV/ WATERMEN AT ROCKED% ROCKEDGE NAPLES.DC RPUD 1 Maw POLP/O Mee,COMP W, . ,...,, womeem2422 n''''2'112*.Itr'''''' 222.2 I it IP 15T PO.PKICOUm C0.10111 SPC pv OPAVIS .7„-,i.v.- --,-- MASTER FLAN -22226,2222'''''F:20--22-...ff''.7..27-111 ;721 iit . 172:212so. we.22m I-772 2 ' ,.. .\1' Page 6 of 16 12-09-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 . Packet Page -1130- 2/9/2016 17.A. EXHIBIT C Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development ROCKEDGE zoNINA:wMEa� RPUD MASTER PLAN CURRENT i USE steal F LAKES Y L___ CURRENT LAND USE:PRESERVE RESIDENTIAL SUS-DIVISION I ..T ,4 R T-•''� J.. .. .._..-.. G.l— -- M36'ROMWAV 1 —— —'CI— -�-»-_SS'TYPE EASDAENT OR 635 r • + • - • • + * •`I 1 15'-WE R , 'B•BUFFER PG 1273 I . ,. •D•BUFFER _.� ZONINO:A•AGRICULTURE • • • • • • • • 1 ! _:----=_ 1 CURRENT LAND USE SINGLE v• °. 1 �` FAWLYRESIDENTULL .y 1 1� R I L — _ I. . . •I ZONING:MFAID. t r) . . . . . . . .) CURRFJIT LAND USE - --138'wroE ?I I 1 ` R —BTYPE (:'--)1*.W . 4. . V SINGLE FAMB.Y RENDEIRAL OR 34 - �\ ly . . -. + . SuBCP.810N 1834 � � \ — i —'� 1806 J .R+' %.:,„ . •I 7-PROPERTY { i.21;.r� jyt CD' 44,04f'� 5* - • . . t /BOUNDARY 1$r�40424-.:�E- .a nip - �I '-v- v��,1**,: .yj'�y .�:: .J/ 1 I I To 8E I k ,- l -.6,::„.„...+,..:„419,....v."• • . Y- • , ZONING:A 1 ,VACAiu ,e i r $1x I I SP $�,•. yi . . .1 AGMUCULTURE J III n � i P i (II� 4,1::::4,:s+-� • . . �� -•r . • • • CURRENT LAND €etp,, 4 a I DBE arR . i L1:60 :1 • • • v'' ''`!+. • • RESIDENTIAL '�I R `v• W. •P• v W W W. W W' W A•AGRICULTURf 1 I - - -- N VAT;RIG TOF Y/ o f.:: . . .y. . . . . . . r I CU VACANT LAND -.•: : ^• 'B 9 BUFFER 15 TYPE �'"O'.'�.O,P`.dd 4'"` .. , . , ,.. • `°. " .i0 L 1r BUFFER I I I �,`i�tittil� . . . . . . . .4: ,. 1 CURRENT ILAND USE:SINGLE FAMILY / R ( `'PROPERTY BOUNDARY 1 RESIDENTIAL,VACANT LAND /��/ POTENTIAL FUTURE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN j//�/ If INTERCONNECTION `` L \` �``�`� ,°„.4, III ZONMA:A•AGRICULTURE i j, d„b PROPERTY BOUNDARY t'�— CURRENT LAND USE NURSERY/SINGLE 1/ \ \ FAMILY RESIDENTIAL a�4 \ R. 15'TYPE f\ •8•BUFFER 4' LEGEND 15'TYPE �% r \ f * ( \ --� R RESIDENTIAL { r \ \ R —15'T RECREATIONAL { � R %/r \� B•BUFFER PROPERTY BOUNDARY RA AREA V--- /*�r/ \ ,`` I P PRESERVE ZONING;A-AGRICULTURE TRAFFIC FLOW / TYPE CURRENT LAND USE: � — PATTERN / r " w �i'"-..•8•BUFFER 1 / lj `�a €3�'} IS'7YPE NURSERY (s) DEVIATIONS 000��� ' ,j •B•BUFFER I 1III `7°b ':� _._._.��l WATER I 2G r I;; PROPERTY BOUNDARY 1,41-#.' MANAGEMENT LAKE r' I E J I ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE p �q ARCHAEOLOGICAL { / I'ly- ui R `' CURRENT USE k AREA 10I ('Iha wl,..,.,�.,._ 1..15 TYPE PRESERVE B'BUFFER LT BOUNDA �. �� MLM ROAD ` MARKER 'D"BUFFER _..__....._.____._..___._.___._...._......-_.___.___...,_.._..._.._v.__.,_ WAT R0.IEN AT ROCKEDGE s KE ROCKEDGE •M.��'tl' NAPLES.LLC RPUD I WI2.C,w[.Ta.-reC.A. :., N ..., eNOINM1I6 "O =Veer ... -- - ` ' — F••• n Nli o hoaat%cce...[M: o v ASTERPUW vr xo • w. fs Page 7 of 16 12-09-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 Packet Page -1131- 1 2/9/2016 17.A. EXHIBIT D Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 664.25 FEET ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF TRACT "F1" OF THE PLAT OF ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55, PAGE 1, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA; THENCE S01°14'38"W FOR 675.75 FEET ON SAID WEST LINE OF TRACT "Fl" TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT"F1"; THENCE S01°14'14"W ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-114) OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 675.73 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S89°42'08"W ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 662.30 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4466, PAGE 3476, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE EAST AND SOUTH LINES OF SAID PARCEL: 1. S01°09'56"W FOR 617.91 FEET; 2. N89°34'54"W FOR 300.19 FEET; 3. S01°09'09"W FOR 435.95 FEET; 4. N89°34'09"W FOR 150.16 FEET; 5. N89°38'05"W FOR 210.56 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF(E-1/2)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°05'19"E ON SAID WEST LINE FOR 43.72 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF(S-1/2)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°48'02"W ON SAID NORTH LINE FOR 15.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4970,PAGE 3362, SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FOUR BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE SOUTH, WEST AND NORTH LINES OF SAID PARCEL 1: I. S01°05'19"W ON SAID EAST LINE FOR 303.80 FEET; 2. N89°37'28"W FOR 645.47 FEET; 3. N01°01'07"E FOR 302.01 FEET Page 8 of 16 12-09-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 Packet Page-1132- 2/9/2016 17.A. EXHIBIT D Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 4. S89°47'35"E FOR 30.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND RECORDED IN IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4466, PAGE 3476, SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL: 1. N01°01'01"E FOR 218.98 FEET; 2. N52°35'40"E FOR 646.23 FEET; 3. N40°29'08"W FOR 30.05 FEET; 4. N49°40'54"E FOR 22.10 FEET; 5. THENCE N36°22'15"E FOR 436.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°42'08"W ON SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 785.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°01'01"E FOR 332.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°32'04"W FOR 994.18 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-I/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°42'08"E FOR 331.15 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°56'29"W FOR 660.13 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°57'42"W FOR 330.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; Page 9 of 16 12-09-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 Packet Page -1133- 2/9/2016 17.A. EXHIBIT D Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development THENCE N89°47'35"W ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 230.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 100 FEET EAST OF (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR)AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N00°51'53"E ON SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1642.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/2)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°22'01"E FOR 894.88 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N00°58'45"E FOR 662.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST(NE-1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 996.40 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF(E-1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S01°05'30"W ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 328.19 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 328.19 FEET SOUTH OF (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR)AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N89°01'53"E ON SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 663.85 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (E-1/4) OF THE .-. NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°10'38"E ON SAID EAST LINE FOR 328.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS THAT PART OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 321, PAGE 259, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL CONTAINS 106.44 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. BEARINGS HEREINABOVE MENTIONED ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST TO BEAR NORTH 89°01'58" EAST. Page 10 of 16 12-09-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 Packet Page -1134- 2/9/2016 17.A. EXHIBIT E Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development LIST OF DEVIATIONS Deviation#1 seeks relief from LDC,Section 6.06.01.N which requires minimum local street right- of-way width of 60 feet,to allow a 50' right-of-way width for the private internal streets. Deviation#2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C,which permits a maximum wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts, to allow a maximum wall height of 8' along the perimeter of the project, and allow a 12' tall wall/berm combination where abutting an existing public roadway. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height, to allow a temporary banner sign up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area. The temporary banner sign shall be limited to maximum of 90 days per calendar year during season defined as November 1 to April 30 . This deviation will remain in force until the project is sold out. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5,which requires on-premises directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10'from edge of roadway,to allow a setback of 5'from the edge of a private roadway/drive aisle. Deviation#5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.14,which allows one(1)boundary marker sign or monument structure at each property corner with a sign face no more than 24 square feet, to allow the option of one(1)monument sign along C.R. 951 with a sign face of 64 square feet, rather the two(2)boundary markers that would be allowed per code. Deviation #6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.04.D.1,which prohibits doors and windows on the zero lot line portion of a dwelling unit,to allow windows. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J which requires cul-de-sac lengths not to exceed 1,000 feet,to allow 2,500 feet for the one cul-de-sac street identified on the RPUD Master Plan Deviation#8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.3.e which limits temporary use permits for model homes to 3 years, to allow a temporary use permit of 5 years without the need to request approval of a Conditional Use petition. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07.H.3.a., which requires a minimum 25' preserve setback for all principal structures to allow a 12.5' side yard setback from preserves for principal structures where identified on the RPUD Master Plan. The reduced setback is allowed in combination with a structural buffer as allowed by the SFWMD. Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4, which requires a 20' Type D buffer along perimeter boundaries abutting a right-of-way for all developments of 15 acres or more,to a allow a 15' Type D buffer adjacent to right-of-ways where identified on the RPUD Master Plan Page 11 of 16 12-09-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 Packet Page -1135- 2/9/2016 17.A. EXHIBIT F Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS PUD MONITORING: One entity(hereinafter the Managing Entity)shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Watermen at Rockedge Naples,LLC or its assigns. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity,then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval,the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. Commencing with submittal of the first development order that utilizes TDR credits, a TDR calculation sheet shall be submitted documenting that the owner has acquired all TDR credits needed for that portion of the development. The calculation sheet tracks the chronological assignment of TDR credits with respect to all subsequent development orders until the maximum density allowed by the utilization of TDR credits has been reached (all TDR credits allowing residential development reach a zero balance). TRANSPORTATION: A. At the request of Collier County, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) bus stop with shelter will be installed by the developer at no cost to the County.The exact location will be determined during site development plan review;however,every effort shall be made for co-utilization of the CAT stop for a school bus pick-up and drop-off. This shall be coordinated with the Collier County School District. If co-utilization is determined not to be feasible, then a site for school bus drop-off and pick-up shall be provided internal to the site. B. The owner, and its successors or assigns will be responsible a proportionate share of signalization and intersection improvements at Sabal Palm Road and Collier Boulevard (CR 951),when warranted. C. The Rockedge PUD Transportation Impact Study was based on a development scenario of 266 single-family detached units. The total trip generation was estimated in the TIS to be 253 PM peak hour two-way external trips based on ITE trip generation rates. The development scenario of 266 single-family detached units may change. However, the Project's estimated trip generation will not exceed a maximum of 253 PM peak hour two- way external trips. Page 12 of 16 12-09-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 Packet Page -1136- I 2/9/2016 17.A. EXHIBIT F Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development D. At the time of the first Site Development Plan,at locations where potential future vehicular and/or non-vehicular interconnection/interconnection points are indicated on the PUD Master Plan, owner shall provide vehicular and/or non-vehicular interconnectivity with abutting roadways and between adjoining sites, when feasible. If interconnection efforts are unsuccessful,the owner shall provide,as part of the SDP submittal,all correspondence between the parties involved to sufficiently document efforts to obtain interconnections. ENVIRONMENTAL: A. Project has 81.81 acres of native vegetation. 3.36 acres of non-native area have been included in the native vegetation preserve requirements due to a past clearing violation by previous owners. Native vegetation requirement is based on the 81.81 acres plus the 3.36 acres or 85.17 acres total. 25% of 85.17 results in a preserve requirement of 21.29 acres. The project is preserving 24.2 acres which is more than required. ARCHAEOLOGICAL: In 2014, a Phase I cultural resource assessment of the site was conducted by Robert S. Carr,M.S., of the Archeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. This assessment (A Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment of the Rockedge Parcel, AHC Technical Report #1024) is a revised and expanded phase of work that follows a 2003 assessment of a portion of the Rockedge parcel. Seven previously recorded sites (CR726, CR873, CR874, CR875, CR896, CR897, CR898) and two previously unrecorded sites (CR1371, CR1372) were documented. Based on the discovery of CR1371,a small black earth midden,a Phase II assessment was completed and the report(A Phase II Cultural Resource Assessment of Rockedge#2, Site 8CR1371,AHC Technical Report#1044). Letters concurring with the findings,results,and recommendations(including Phase III mitigation) of the two reports were received on 12/31/15 and 3/04/15 respectively. In accordance with the Phase 1 assessment: A. Prior to any clearing or grubbing activities within 100 feet of the archaeological preserves labeled "to be preserved" or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map, a temporary construction fence shall be placed around the preserve areas and around the site labeled "designated for Phase 3 mitigation" if that site has not already been mitigated. B. Any clearing of exotic vegetation within the archaeological preserve labeled"to be preserved" or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation", if not already mitigated, on the Archaeological Site Locations Map shall be conducted by hand.No mechanical equipment shall be used within the archaeological preserves for clearing or debris removal. C. All activities of clearing, grubbing, and subsurface alterations such as digging for utilities ditches, water management lakes, roads and the like that are located within 90 feet of the archaeological preserves labeled "to be preserved"or"designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map and archaeological sites labeled "not eligible to be preserved" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map shall be subject to archaeological monitoring. Page 13 of 16 12-09-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 Packet Page -1137- 2/9/2016 17.A. EXHIBIT F Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development D. The site plan shows archaeological areas within the preserves labeled "to be preserved" or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation"on the Archaeological Site Locations Map. No storage of fill, equipment or supplies shall be placed in the archaeological areas within the native vegetation preserve. E. Should any replanting or landscaping be permitted or required within the archaeological preserves labeled "to be preserved" or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map, such activity shall be coordinated with and monitored by an archaeologist. F. If any archaeological features or artifacts are discovered during construction or development activities in the Rockedge RPUD, all development and construction activities shall cease at that location until the site has been examined by an archaeologist and necessary efforts to protect and/or document such resources have been implemented. G. If additional human remains are discovered within the Rockedge RPUD, then the provisions of Florida Statutes Section 872.05—laws governing the treatment of unmarked human burials—shall apply. Page 14 of 16 12-09-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 Packet Page -1138- 2/9/2016 17.A. EXHIBIT G Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development C � ., 7 ri »14;•I a,a "p rfi, ,. '*,,.y , .', { � �1 1. .e r��fa 1 K 1 �p ,: 9 5 $k 1..* !, E {# xfA !t ( Y,45-10014,,,,7'> r%� 'tGur I ". i rc '�, t �, ,,y, . e S P 1 ${ r '; w _':,t t e r - 1. J w a,' .,q r 1,i + ( 'W ' t. �., mow... . . ,, i� 'Iii 1 { Mr T �N t , ?, l fi. ' E d tF Y _ 111 i t . - \ F F, r i �iw � j r a fir, 'YI wA { i w A49r 3 r al (; 0 f Y�b 3'' '.' ■ I s,, ,,,•;,1 k �+ ,,JI > ' ry+r , s : l m 1 - s . ',', xw-. - �d a n 1'lGy ,' J1,V dplo ''t a , 4,,,,„H- ice .,,v Et ,RAni.3 ,» ''r&'� �'•4rYFLP.. w{ # �`Ay' fe ,e,''if�r 4 ,t r''441 y � $,tk.' i' I , , .� .r 6 it ' r,irxv j aw i�J x n -a ':''..T• d �y`F€r U � w ;i,* f4 i pl.;a't v'.. + '"v ik .rrc'a,+"�' —0,1.,...1,1-0'-`1,,,-.,--# '--;-,4 `'�R`; 1} ,---. ' ''r ta'M j t w✓t ��M y,'6d��°� 4 1 X11+' ' w +ka I, �a CR874— CR726 r LEGEND CR87S CR896 —TO BE PRESERVED CR873 CR1372 NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESERVED CR897 CR898_ {:. ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE CR1371—DESIGNATED FOR PHASE 3 MITIGATION 2 1,0iMilo...1 scmc. °"-ions 1'=Soo • 4CUENT: WATERMEN NAPLES AT,ROCKEDGE LLC ..... TITLE: ENGINEERING MDA 6610 Willow Park7075UIte2009)3 7,578 34109 "P«.BC ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE LOCATIONS 1239)5970575 FAIT:(339)597-0578 BCB wvw.consult rwaxom sic rwn Zia: PROJECT SHEET f4LE Florida Certificates of Aucfwr alto,EB 766316 6953 23 SOS 26E NUMBER: ���•�•� NUMBER 1 of ]. I Nl.1MBER: AYWMJRt lD MI[1103T O0 i1Y 4M1raia**llA 1YIW�M�40i1wMNMINOb.IMCrIbY11CCN �A�Mm[OpCK 9r1SM Page 15 of 16 12-09-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 Packet Page -1139- 2/9/2016 17.A. EXHIBIT H Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development n , 4x - €sln kin Gorr n g -: a i. $ 6 i.'1'.'5 , i p - - - - - - C. W l ° 3 ,, 9 I y �y,,.�'�'k hi3 d �`rL` A = Z G ,,, ¢ ,�P-4134,--4,,, ,4-1,.° `fit t r -�On '� 44' 1 �c ,SyY }V QZ , i- V Nava" 8i � � i E .r _.. 4 -.. a I i b H i I 1 i t ■ I i1 l n Page 16 of 16 12-09-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 Packet Page -1140- 2/9/2016 17.A. PM ft. .. a 'z ti n_ Nate NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE OF INTENT TO CONSIDER AN ORDINANCE Notice is hereby given that on Tuesday,February 9,2016, in the Board of County Commissioners Meeting Room, Third Floor, Collier Government Center,3299 East Tamiami Trail,Naples FL., the Board of County Commissioners (BCC) will consider the enactment of a County Ordinance. The meeting will commence at 9:00 A.M. The title of the proposed Ordinance is as follows: AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE O AGRICULTURAL(A)ZONING DISTRICT AND THE RESIDENTIAL • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT.(RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A 106.44± ACRE PARCEL TO BE • KNOWN AS THE ROCKEDGE RPUD TO ALLOW UP TO 266 DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF SABAL rp PALM ROAD AND COLLIER BOULEVARD IN SECTION 23, p TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, A3 FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO., 06-31, THE FORMER ROCKEDGE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT;AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PETITION PUDR-PL20150002246] A copy of the proposed Ordinance is on file with the Clerk to the Board and is available for inspection. All interested parties are invited to attend and be heard. 0 NOTE: All persons wishing to speak on any agenda item must 0 register with the County manager prior to presentation of the agenda item to be addressed. Individual speakers will be ar.)' limited to 3 minutes on any item. The selection of any individual to speak on behalf of an organization or group is encouraged. If recognized by the Chairman, a spokesperson for a group or v organization may be allotted 10 minutes to speak on an item. r m Persons wishing to have written or graphic materials included in the Board agenda packets must submit said material a minimum P of 3 weeks prior to the respective public hearing. In any case, written materials intended to be considered by the Board shall m be submitted to the appropriate County staff a minimum of seven days prior to the public hearing. All materials Used in presentations before the,Board will become a permanent part of the record. Any person who decides to appeal any decision of the Board will need a record of the proceedings pertaining thereto and therefore, may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is based. If you are a person with adisabilitywho needs any accommodation in order to participate in this proceeding, you are entitled, at no cost to you, to the provision of certain assistance. Please contact the Collier County Facilities Management Division, located at 3335 Tamiami Trail East,Suite 101, Naples, FL 34112- 5356, (239) 252-8380, at least two days prior to the meeting. Assisted listening devices for the hearing impaired are available in the Board of County Commissioners Office. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA DONNA FIALA,CHAIRWOMAN DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK By: Martha Vergara,Deputy Clerk tTh (SEAL) January 20,2016 No.888049 Packet Page -1141- 2/9/2016 17.A. TERMINATION AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, as entered into on the day of 2016, between WATERMEN AT ROCKEDGE NAPLES, LLC (hereinafter referred to as the "OWNER"), and the COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (hereinafter referred to as"COUNTY"). WHEREAS, Woodfield Builders, LLC and the COUNTY entered into an Agreement authorizing Affordable Housing Density Bonus and Imposing Covenants and Restrictions on Real Property in 2006 (hereinafter"Agreement"); and WHEREAS, WATERMEN AT ROCKEDGE NAPLES, LLC, as successor to Woodfield Builders, LLC, has petitioned the County to reduce the residential density on its property and terminate the Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows: The Agreement is hereby terminated upon the effective date of the amendment to the Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be duly executed the date and year last written below. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Deputy Clerk TIM NANCE, Chairman WATERMEN AT ROCKEDGE NAPLES, LLC WITNE' SE (1) ! B ' �--- Signa ure- Si•nattu& o-t5; C" -i Printed/Typed Name Printed/Typed Name (2) Printed/Typed Title Signature PrintedfTyped Name I of 2 Packet Page -1142- 2/9/2016 17.A. Approved as to farm and legality: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Managing Assistant County Attorney 2 of 2 Packet Page -1143- AGENDA ITEM 9-A Co er Cwounty STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION FROM: ZONING DIVISION—ZONING SERVICES SECTION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: DECEMBER 3,2015 SUBJECT: PUDR-PL20140002246, ROCKEDGE PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) Applicant/Owner: Watermen at Rockedge, LLC. 265 Sevilla Avenue Coral Gables, FL 33134 Agents: Patrick Vanasse,AICP Richard Yovanovich, Esq. Colerman Yovanovich RWA, Inc. 6610 Willow Park Dr. Suite 2 &Koester PA Naples,FL 34109 4001 Tamiami Trail North, Suite 300 Naples,FL 34103 REQUESTED ACTION: The petitioner requests that the Collier County Planning Commission consider changing Ordinance Number 2004-41, as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code, which established the comprehensive zoning regulations for the unincorporated area of Collier County, Florida by amending the appropriate zoning atlas map or maps by changing the zoning classification of the herein described real property from the Agricultural (A) zoning district and the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a 106.67± acre parcel to be known as the Rockedge RPUD to allow up to 266 dwelling units, providing for repeal of Ordinance No 06-31, the former Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development; and providing an effective date. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property is located near the northeast corner of the intersection of Saba! Palm Road and Collier Boulevard in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida and consists of 106.67±acres for the entire Rockedge PUD. (Please see the location map on page 2 and proposed PUD Master Plan on page 3 and 4 of this Staff Report.) Rockedge PUDR—P120140002246 November 23,2015 Page 1 of 24 k i is i'i r r F..F- t j.M4• G r ! 9 Ii eg%`' �• ;�` 'in 1 ��IM i S n ,• , �, p w • w �Ry +�is i��,,,, � r 17/1. Q• p�Q� /, i I .i 4 `S 1 9 t F B q 3 q ;0 .' C7 ii il 1 4 *1404 E ij _u i r { i . , {� . it xj ° ipI sl { suF ' Nip. ill s c. Il l „{i FtF1E.. 1 � ; 1 i its{ _ FI ( ; `'.-1\''''..„.„1 __.. rs17� C $ a Yf A� Y(I it ■ 1t� 1 .h'J.'J Dili i I , ` '� f�i f��f.s. �Q� • d i1 l d-1 1 ,r, ait =,'. ,.'?:1.1 Sa,• �• �. i i r�j1' l�AQh f`I Oa 191 illt, ©� 4V• vl1, 44 it”, d i INNEORMilt 41 111:111./MIN 11111.11111emei di RI cv J a . I • L oz Ill im ai I - F II,w N l t 14 I Ma N. Q lei AI 1 139 , �� i Wi*,744.4 Q 11 i ks is ' 11 r. W 1 AMU V �'X10, 11� a gi . i 1„.11 .1 L ; ' n-fir,_' _ € ' - ill 51st R 19 m /V- 1 r Rockedge PUDR—PL20140002246 November23,2015 Page 2 of 24 MASTER PLAN 1 of 2: R0CKEDGE p ' I` LEGEND CURRENT LAND :RV MASTER PLAN R RESIDENTIAL PARK RECREATIONAL d. RA t wwNs Rau l ® € AREA p PRESERVE POUNDARY 1 1 t TRAFFIC FLOW I I - PATTERN I 15'TYPE f' I 0 DEVIATIONS ZONING: •B•BUNK 4 I I ;I WATER (SCATTERED FAY RESIDENTIAL) l L I LMnE 1 �- MANAGEMENT LAKE J I I i. ARCHAEOLOGICAL AREA I. I. 20'AMITY RD ESME& -S'DRAINAGE SWALE ESMT. I +` PRESERVE s I OR2625PG.2485 2026 t .AG AGREEMENT GA I I I I o BOUNDARY I I _ J MARKER & `� — 1..��_ -- 4_ — —'1 � ♦ ♦ , tt:�� t 1 J I.TYPE is'TYPE R I I G. i •D'BUFFER 'D•BUFFER tf LAND USE SUMMARY �' — — TRACT LAND USE ACREAGE I 1, i — 15♦ —r. I R "g"BUFFER RA �' TRACT 1r RESIDENTIAL 58.13+f AC (' ! — TRACT•P' PRESERVE 2421+/.AC € i TRACT'RA'RECREATION ARIA QA1+/.AC II 1 TRACT'1.• LMEIWATERMANAGEMENT 10.20+AAC ZONVIGIA-AGRICULTURE ACCESS owe/R.R.W. 1x64+.AC I I CURRENT LAND USE SINGLE FAMILY TOTAL 10044+/-AC 20 TYPE § • � " RESIDENTIAL,VACANT LAND. _� E g � Q"BUFFER i P PROPERTY BOUNDARY--.�� MAXIMUM DENSITY 268 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS I 460 DWELLING UNITS DERIVED FROM �.I �0 R — __ u.�E BASE Ig _ "B•BUFFER DENSITY;106 FROM TDRS r 'I R 1 1 I 1`'! I RPLX2 MASIER PLAN NDTEB I i _ PROPERTY ' ( 1.WITHIN Cr HE RPUD BOUNDARIES THERE WILL BE t. I 1 =) _ ,�BOUNDARY ± -! DA sn, i A MSRMUM OF 9O%OPEN SPACE. ,. R '� —11 J I ZONING A PG.178s ?THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN AGRCULTURE ON THIS PUD MASTER PLAN SHALL BE ME L + CURRENT LAND USE: ( CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE.SINGLE I ,P i RESIDENTIA.VACANT 3 THE DESIGN,LOCATION,AND CONFIGURATION 1 — _ LAND I OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE I , Id DEFINED AT EITHER PRELIMINARY ! i! ( 10'TYPE 15'TYPE I SUBDIVISION PLAT APPROVAL,OR •A BUFFER '8•BUFFER 15 TYPE .I CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL. ! 1 / i.a BUFFER I I POTENTIAL FUTURE 4.REQUIRED PRESERVE:2124 AC(25%OF NUT INTERCONNECT 1 1 AO OF EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION. ■ I ! PRESERVE PROVIDED:24.20 AC ZONING:A- I I I AGRICULTURAL 5. BICYCLE I PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION(8)TO CURRENT LAND USE 1 TFIE MULTI-USE PATH ALONG COLLIER 10'IYPE NURSERY ( 150'RAY • BOULEVARD •A BUFFER ( PG. .R B9 I MAYBE PROVIDED AT TIME OF PPE.OR SDP. ROPERTY PROPERTY BOUNDARY EASEMENT BOUNDARY 1 TD REMAIN 6. MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ZON IN G:A•AGNUCULTURAUM E ROW ( 1 REQUIREMENTS MAY BE MET WITH EXISTING CURRENT LAND USE:NURSERY RY I I I- PRESERVE.WHERE THE PRESERVE DOES NOT „ ;,. € =T MEET THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ... CURRENT BASAL D,WI1ROAD _ ZONWN N ,1MND44ti fllAL, E REQUIREMENTS IUIU REMEiNTS SHALL BE REQUIRED.THERE RRENT LAND LEE:RESIDENTIAL,VERONA [l P - v. lean.....Drwwlm A.4.m S NMt MYNr WATERMEN AT ROCKECGE ROCKEDGE amir.r, ""1°N• NAPLES,ILL RPUO t 2 'R R ROLM COUN12 COMM DM SK VI 1M4n, INOOeIEN6 R.W J•C-ie..un.` 'iw ro!• s i NR 1ST ROUNDCC1WW C(N.lNTS SNC w anvu ..901 N MASTER PUN! W'uAY1c.'i--1w('•.w,y� s',� i`e ,W, ,a .. ♦ W J'••' Sa ♦ "•ia1LDoa."~RRYIUN,ann, "..77,1 . •A......N w.MA W..N.wYN.,...M.FN.♦IMMiMN lIYI►a.•.♦....4) Rockedge PUDR—PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 3 of 24 MASTER PLAN 2 of 2: ROCKEDGE LAKER 7.0MING:PUD, REGIONAL RPUD MASTER PLAN CURRENT u�uEe"".REIGLE FAMILY CURRENT LAND Ube PRESERVE RESIDENTIAL SUE-DIVISION re r•z _ __ 30 ROADWAY • i • • W i i W V I" •-1s TYPE EASEMENT 0.R.6s • W W W • W J I ' 15'-YPE R -r BUFFER PG.1273 • W • .. W V I "D"BUFFER • ZA-AGRICULTURE • • i W • W I I / — CUO�NT LAND USE:BNDLE • •i y y W i i W W I FAMILY RESIDENTIAL T y W • • W y W IR V W W W • W W W V I r Mr y W •. i. V p.W W V i ♦ ZON ING :TAP .• V V • V y W W Wi WW W W W HACIENDA LARBE-� I ' 1 W W * W • . W W V CURRENT LAND UB E f 3 WIDE I R 9 TYPE 'B BUFFER 01. •• . i W i • I BINDLE FANLY I I ` _ I. i W W W REBBEMUL QA {{ W W • WW • W BUBDMBICN I I 1631 \ — � W i . • iiii iii . \\ '•••••• W:•• • i0 y• W 4 O ..t.:.::?::::::::::::::: •'• W • •9 : • W >.1/W W " // QINDARY PG.1006 f FE.NH I T iACA I I I I I I N II II LME III I Q2�I ' � J1 I W W iii W W W y r• .✓ ,,**:�. O•: V . V i •I •1• •444 >*• ••i•.*. y>*• y y ZONING:A- r f ••: > • ,v i * • i • • • W ❖ •• W i CURRENT LAND 1 •:•••!•••:f 1 i>• •W W W • ••:.•. W W USE:SEIG .• •• y i•i • • : •W• • W W -:•W •• • W •yWWW • a. 4. • WW • • • V VW1 FAMILY RESIDENTIAL t fl R • • • W p• • W i• W W W •I I !W• W W W W W W W W W W W W . W • W I A-AGRICULTUR E _ .� ••• * CURRENT LAND D�• i- I I\ •••. _ ~ r ::•::::!: i • VACANT LAND• El r•I. I5 TYPE 16 TPE , W i::i�:••.l W W W W W i W W W W •W „.W W W �A+ W B'BUFFER 'B'BUFFER I t I W :::::.*❖p❖:: tP: 7 r ....=......,......v.......-� _..III 1 / _ — ZONIING:A-AGRICULTURa ( ROPE TTY BOUNDARY I CURRENT LAND USE:SINGLE FAMLY / R I REDDENTIAL•VACANT LAND //7 1 I POTENTIAL FUTURE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN II / / -—)1 I INTERCONNECTION 20. 11 L -H- S (( LME Z@BNG:A•AGRICULTURE 1 PROPERTY BOUNDARY \ =' -") I CURRENT LAND USE NURSERY/SINGLE J\ R J FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 1 -is TYPE 13"TYPE / / / �� LEGEND ■ "D"BUFFER R RESIDENTIAL / .\\% R 'B'BIFER RA RECREATIONAL I R7," J PROPENCiY BOUNDARY AREA P PRESERVE ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE TRAFFIC FLOW r /// �� BUFFER CURRENT LAND USE — PATTERN / R //� // 15 TYPE NURSERY 5 DEVIATIONS 1 1 "r BUFFER I ,} Ip 1J.r. 1 } `PROPU 1YBOUNDARY I i1 WATER MANAGEMENT LAKE UM I I ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE p•,•,+� ARCHAEOLOGICAL • / I I 1 I CURRENT LAND USE +�+�•'• AREA I O J iS 1YPE VACANT LAND r•-•I PRESERVE —Am■ r BUFFER 0 BOUNDARY D'1YN Q- JABAL.PAIM MAO ......_. MARKER 'D'BUFFER • 0 MO wame ore mon wasp �01ba Nlw WATERMEN AT ROCKEDGE ROCKEDGE �Iwrtln weps4oaw NAPLES.LLC RPUD 1 MIND wC W wAVlf lNOrl1lwgl ww2 uwD «r "'swans '"T.Sw`f-"`PS A Be 1 101110110u10 Cal/1111 CdINRS PC N 0711411 MASTER PLAN VM,1 IIO1�.M n-ra 1.1W I•aW. f1C ■ .•2200114141 i'""MDRMIIILI\141 .."7":,2 —rq—rwl�wa+q.wr.r•-w1�'w.yr/r.W lw"w�w-rrrrati Rockedge PUDR-PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 4 of 24 PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The Rockedge RPUD was originally approved in Ordinance Number 06-31 on June 6, 2006. This multi-family "only" RPUD included an affordable housing component consisting of at least 30 percent of the units required to be sold to buyers earning 80 percent or less of Collier County's median income. With the density bonus of affordable housing,400 total units (5.09 units per acre) are allowed on 76.46±acres. The petitioner proposes to add an additional 32± acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A) into the Rockege RPUD. The petitioner is also proposing to remove the affordable housing component (A Board of County Commissioner approved affordable housing termination agreement is required concurrent with this PUD approvaI), with 106 units derived from Transfer of Development Rights (TDR), decrease the density to 2.5 units per acre, allowing 266 units on 106.67± acres. The proposed development units are revised to allow multi-family,townhomes, duplexes, single-family attached, single-family detached, and single-family detached(zero lot line). The petitioner also proposes to: 1. Relocate the projects entrance from C.R. 951 (Collier Boulevard)to Sabal Palm Road. 2. Revise the PUD Master Plan to include additional lands and a new project layout. 3. Increase the preserve from 21.86±to 24.20±acres. 4. Deviate from the required street right-of-way width of 60 feet to 50 feet (Section 6.06.01,N). 5. Deviate from the 6-foot wall height maximum to allow for a 12-foot wall/berm combination(LDC Section 5.03.02.C). 6. Deviate from the allowable 4 square-foot maximum temporary signs to allow 32 square feet(LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e). 7. Deviate from the minimum setback requirement for on-premise directional signs from a 10- foot setback to 5 feet(LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5). 8. Deviate from allowing two (2) 24 square-foot boundary markers along C.R. 951 (Collier Boulevard) with the option allowing one (1) sign at 64 square feet (LDC Section 5.06.02.B.14). 9. Deviate from LDC Section 4.02.04.D.1, that prohibits doors and windows on zero lot lines, to allow windows. 10.Deviate from LDC Section 6.06.01.J, that requires cul-de-sac's lengths not to exceed 1,000 feet,to allow up to 2,500 feet for one dead end as identified on the Master Plan. 11.Deviate from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.3.e, that limits temporary use permits for model homes to 3 years, and extend to 5 years without the need to request the approval of a Conditional Use petition. 12. Deviate from LDC Section 3.05.07.H.3.a, which requires a minimum 25-foot preserve setback,to allow a 12.5-foot side yard preserve setback for principal structures. Rockedge PUDR—PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 5 of 24 Furthermore,the following development standards are proposed: DEVELOPMENT SINGLE SINGLE DUPLEX& TOWNHOUSE MULTI- RECREATION STANDARDS FAMILY FAMILY TWO- e ATTACHED FAMILY° FAMIL DETACHED° &SINGLE Y FAMILY ZERO LOT LINE° PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA 4,000 S.F. 3,500 S.F. 3,500 S.F. 1,600 S.F. PER N/A N/A PER UNIT UNIT MIN. LOT WIDTH 1 40 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 16 FEET N/A N/A MIN.FRONT YARD 2,3 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET MIN. SIDE YARD 5 FEET 00R10 0 AND 5 0 AND 5 FEET 10 FEET 1/2 BH FEET FEET MIN. REAR YARD 6,7 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MIN. PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 0 OR 10 10 FEET 10 FEET 0 OR 10 FEET 20 FEET 'h sum of the BH STRUCTURES4 FEET MAX. ZONED BUILDING 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 45 FEET 35 FEET HEIGHT MAX.ACTUAL BUILDING 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 55 FEET 40 FEET HEIGHT ACCESSORY STRUCTURES MIN. FRONT YARD SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS MIN.SIDE YARD SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS MIN.REAR YARD 8,7 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 0 FEET MINI. PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MAX. ZONED BUILDING 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET HEIGHT MAX.ACTUAL BUILDING 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET HEIGHT BH: Building Height(zoned height) SPS:Same as Principal Structure Rockedge PUDR—P120140002246 November 23,2015 Page 6 of 24 1. The minimum lot width may be reduced by 20 percent, provided the minimum lot area requirement shall be maintained. 2. For multi-family product the front yard setbacks shall be measured from back of curb, or edge of pavement if not curbed. For all other unit types, front yard setbacks shall be measured from right-of-way line. The minimum 15-foot front yard setback may be reduced to 10 feet where the unit has a recessed or side-entry garage. Front-loading garages shall be set back a minimum of 23 feet from edge of sidewalk. 3. For corner lots, only 1 front yard setback shall be required. The yard that does not contain the driveway shall provide a minimum 10-foot setback. 4. The minimum distance between buildings may be reduced to 0 feet where attached garages are provided. However,the principal structures shall maintain a 10-foot minimum separation. 5. Accessory pool cage setbacks may be reduced to 0 feet when attached to a common privacy wall. 6. If single family development is pursued through the County's plat process, Lake Management Easement's(LME)and Landscape Buffer Easement's(LBE)will be platted as separate tracts. 7. When a lot abuts a (LME) or (LBE), the minimum rear yard shall be measured from the easement. Otherwise,the minimum rear yard shall be measured from the parcel boundaries. 8. In order to support a canopy tree with a minimum 20-foot crown spread as required in LDC Section 4.06.05, individual lots must accommodate enough space for the entire 20-foot canopy to be located wholly within the lot boundaries, except where the lot is adjacent to a lake maintenance easement and/or landscape buffer easement, in which case, a portion of the required 20-foot canopy may protrude into such area. This applies to all residential lots within the PUD. SURROUNDING LAND USE AND ZONING North: Amity Road and scattered residential with a zoning designation of(A),Naples RV Resort with a zoning designation of(TTRVC),Johns Road,preserve with a zoning designation of Collier Regional Medical Center,and Hacienda Lakes with a density of 0.78 unit per acre and a zoning designation of MPUD/DRI(Mixed use and Development of Regional Impact). East: Scattered residential development with a zoning designation of (A) and Hacienda Lakes with a zoning density of 0.78 and a zoning designation of MPUD/DRI. South: Scattered residential development with a zoning designation of(A), a landscape nursery with a zoning designation of(A), Winding Cypress with a zoning density of 1.4 units per acre and a zoning designation of PUD,and Sabal Palm Road. West: Lely Resort with a zoneing density of 3.10 and a zoning designation of PUD, C.R. 951 (Collier Boulevard), scattered residences with a zoning designation of(A), and a landscape nursery with a zoning designation of(A). Rockedge PUDR—PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 7 of 24 S e a o,i°a D F2 jj1 „,�y k Gy y;a o y P��!a i os a ro.T EIR N €('`�w, tlla t `} I R t VILLGpa l i ox T.E'R S CURRENT KEDGE RFUD 'i i'' '''''''''' '' 7”'41'1 1‘41.-' 14'41 a (t74.4b acres) R�K W Y � L c.eF'lo T EAR N � . ;, ��xi«„ ' ,.LEI_Y N Cy'�� SS - i, RESdRT C',bc`ov '.er g N 4„Bamboo L ' �"” '• # �,. JohiTS RD r t20CKl-f)GE I S 22 a _, I 1E0 R 26 _ R 26 �it /Sni11 ''''P- D , , to P� I "-cal t . ( ro �i It .'14'. t n. —WIN'' , - Sabai Palm RU - __-- � - � I _ CYPRESS°"V 1'. ' c nave �Ik C'IR s PROPOSED "ni a {' ADDITIONTAL ��2� + �.�',i rr fi ` "'a z fix,/ " ACREAGE ±31 91 acres) E� ] 50 t,G f,,,,i I d i , T N'o v a _ ¢ .„„,,,,,,,,,:•,,..,?�' '.i• 1 'r I E r1 ■,"tag. 1"''‘,6" r Ek t. e . ry rt i- �e 4d ' `';27 :' �.,_.. .,I `eE'f^‘ -,n d E-), C,,T ?,`d r -tr ,'",',7,,;;;-,„,,,,...'qy r "". .;2o ' '( d:i 1 , <n �' +..dskt � r;, �JLYati' CTY 1 °k ` }�� ? ` ,. ' t)T'P r��. r E itE • 1� -,-, , ,-z C« , y AERIAL PHOTO—SUBJECT SITE BOUNDARIES Rockedge PUDR—PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 8 of 24 GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY The subject property is designated Urban Mixed-Use District, Urban Residential Fringe (URF) Subdistrict, as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and addressed in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP). The applicable provisions of the URF Subdistrict found in the FLUE are listed below,followed by staff analysis in [bold text]. The purpose of the URF Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the Urban Designated Area and the Agricultural/Rural Area. Relative to this petition, the URF Subdistrict allows a residential density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre (DU/A) — along with associated recreational uses and essential services — and up to 6.0 additional DU/A by providing affordable housing. This bonus density is specifically addressed in URF Subdistrict subsection b. and describes a portion of the Rockedge subject site — and is no longer being pursued. The existing RPUD is approved for a maximum density of 5.9 DU/A (utilizing the Affordable-Workforce Housing Bonus —up to 400 residential units —on the original 76.46±acres). This acreage increases to 106.44±with this PUD amendment. The URF Subdistrict allows a residential density of 1.5 DU/A, and up to 2.5 DU/A via use of Transfer of Development Right (TDR) credits [and the same recreational uses and essential services]. TDR credits will be used to achieve the additional density/dwelling units. TDR credits must be obtained from Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands located within one mile of the URF Subdistrict. This PUD proposes the maximum eligible density/dwelling units utilizing TDR credits. Based upon the increased, overall site acreage, the site is eligible for 160 dwelling units without use of TDR Credits (106.44 ac. x 1.5 DU/A= 159.66 --> 160 DUs) and 266 DUs with use of TDR credits(106.44 ac. x 1 DU/A= 106.44 -› 106 DUs; 160 DUs+ 106 DUs=266 DUs). Regarding the TDR tracking and redemption process for development orders submitted subsequent to rezoning (Site Development Plan (SDP) and plats), LDC Section 2.03.07D.4.f.ii.c.i. requires documentation to be submitted as part of SDP's and plats to demonstrate the applicant is in possession of the required number of TDR Credits for the project. However, it does not explicitly require the submittal of a density calculation and TDR Credit tracking sheet with each SDP and plat—so as to track the chronological assignment of base density and TDR Credits with respect to each individual plat, plan or project, or the redemption of TDR Credits (the GMP also does not contain these specific requirements) — so staff routinely requests such a commitment be added to the PUD. Exhibit F, Developer Commitments,already proposes such a commitment. The URF Subdistrict encourages a rezone to be in the form of a planned unit development. [Rockedge began as a PUD and is proposed here as a PUD amendment and rezone by expansion. Comprehensive Planning staff points out that the LDC requires that TDR credits be utilized in accordance with the requirements of Section 2.03.07.D.4.g. The PUDA will utilize TDRs proportionately (which would be 60% Base DUs and 40% TDR DUs). Of the 266 DUs proposed, 160 are derived from Base density and 106 DUs are derived from TDRs.] Main URF Subdistrict provisions provide that "Proposed development in the Subdistrict shall be fully responsible for all necessary water management improvements, including the routing of all on-site and appropriate off-site water through the project's water management system, and a fair share cost of necessary improvements to the CR 951 canal/out-fall system made necessary by new Rockedge PUDR—PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 9 of 24 development in the Subdistrict." [Comprehensive Planning defers to the Engineering Services staff as part of their review of the petition.] FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new developments to be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land area. [Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to the Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirety. However, staff notes that in reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses/densities on the subject site, the compatibility analysis is to be comprehensive and include a review of both the subject property and surrounding or nearby properties with regard to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location,traffic generation/attraction,etc.] In order to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following FLUE policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects,where applicable. Each policy is followed by staff analysis in [bold text]. Objective 7: In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [This site fronts the canal located on the east side of Collier Boulevard. Exhibit C,RPUD Master Plan,depicts a single, • indirect access to Collier Boulevard (CR 951) — classified as an arterial road in the Transportation Element—via Sabal Palm Road.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal accesses or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals, [Exhibit C,RPUD Master Plan, depicts an internal road configuration providing internalized accesses along a network of dead-end streets, cul-de-sacs and loop roadways. All vehicular traffic accesses Collier Boulevard (CR 951) indirectly via Sabal palm Road from a single street access. The Master Plan also depicts a "potential future(vehicular and non-vehicular) interconnect" at the end of the hammerhead cul-de-sac in the southwest quadrant of the site. Non-vehicular interconnection is encouraged to be pursued and provided at locations where vehicular interconnection is pursued and will not be provided.] Exhibit E, List of Requested Deviations, requests relief from the prohibition on cul-de-sac length in excess of 1,000 feet. [John's Road and Amity Road do not lend themselves to interconnection points, making vehicular interconnection that would effectively reduce the cul-de-sac length infeasible. One other means of access is depicted on Exhibit C, as a "potential future (vehicular and non-vehicular) interconnect" at the end of the hammerhead Rockedge PUDR—PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 10 of 24 cul-de-sac in the southwest quadrant of the site. If completed, this connection will effectively reduce the cul-de-sac length. No other deviation requested poses consistency concerns.] Policy 7.3: All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type. The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [Transportation Policy 9.3 provides that "The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require the interconnection of neighboring developments". LDC Section 6.06.01.8 provides that "The street layout of all subdivisions or developments shall be coordinated with the street systems of the surrounding areas, [and] adjacent properties shall be provided with local street interconnections unless topography, other natural features, or other ordinances/regulations do not allow or require said connections". Local street connections with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments are not disallowed by other ordinances or regulations, and appear to be feasible in at least one (1) location on the perimeter of the irregularly horseshoe-shaped subject site,as follows: 1. John's Road lies along a majority of the northernmost boundary of the subject PUD. John's Road is private and is expected to remain so. Land uses lying along this boundary do not lend themselves to interconnection points, and makes vehicular interconnection infeasible. 2. Amity Road lies along a segment of the northerly boundary of the subject PUD. Amity Road is private and is expected to remain so. Land uses lying along this boundary do not lend themselves to interconnection points, and makes vehicular interconnection infeasible. 3. Developed and undeveloped residential properties lie to the east of the subject PUD, along with indoor and outdoor plant nursery facilities. The local street connection depicted on Exhibit C, as a "potential future (vehicular and non-vehicular) interconnect" at the end of the hammerhead cul-de-sac in the southwest quadrant of the site will improve movement throughout the road network. 4. Sabal Palm Road lies along a segment of the southerly boundary of the subject PUD. Land further to the south is the VeronaWalk residential PUD. The subject PUD provides its single, primary access point with Sabal Palm Road. 5. A recreational pathway, water management canal and Collier Boulevard lie to the west of a portion of the subject PUD—where interconnection is possible and feasible. Connection with/access to Collier Boulevard however, is not being encouraged by the County and is infeasible here. Unnecessarily more-frequent and longer trips, higher greenhouse gas emissions, vehicle congestion, etc. characterize the absence of interconnection between these abutting roadways and properties, and perpetuates a development style not encouraged by the County. Commitments toward completing this potential future interconnection (at the end of the Rockedge PUDR—PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 11 of 24 hammerhead cul-de-sac in the southwest quadrant of the site) need to be strengthened in Exhibit F,Developer Commitments.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities, common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [As to walkable communities,the PUD provides for sidewalks located on both sides of all streets. Similar to the vehicular interconnection features discussed above, Exhibit C, RPUD Master Plan, and other PUD materials provide for non-vehicular interconnection with abutting properties at two locations. Non-vehicular interconnection is possible and appears feasible at one other location—and is provided. A point of"potential future bicycle/pedestrian interconnection" is depicted on Exhibit C, on the east central property boundary. • Staff supports the completion of these future interconnections, as they serve to alleviate problems associated with underdeveloped interconnectivity, and adhere to a development style encouraged by the County. Plus, these bicycle/pedestrian connection points help to achieve a more acceptable cul-de-sac length (for bicyclists and pedestrians) and the walkability desired by the FLUE. Walkability is generally satisfied when these distances (between connection points) do not exceed one-quarter of a mile(1,320 feet). With regard to common open spaces, preserve areas and civic facilities, the PUD provides the sixty percent open space the LDC requires; permits community centers and clubhouses, various recreational uses and facilities,including tennis and basketball courts and biking and hiking paths, and passive open space uses and structures in residential areas. Designated preserve areas permit passive recreational uses and structures. With regard to a blend of densities and a range of housing prices and types, the application identifies a variety of residential units (with minimum floor areas ranging from 1,600 sq. ft. to 4,000 sq. ft.).] Regarding the TDR tracking and redemption process for development orders submitted subsequent to rezoning (SDPs and plats), LDC Section 2.03.07D.4.f.ii.c.(i) requires documentation to be submitted as part of SDPs and plats to demonstrate the applicant is in possession of the required number of TDR Credits for the project. However, it does not explicitly require the submittal of a density calculation and TDR Credit tracking sheet with each SDP and plat — so as to track the chronological assignment of base density and TDR Credits with respect to each individual plat, plan or project, or the redemption of TDR Credits (the GMP also does not contain these specific requirements). Both of these items have been added to the PUD as developer commitments,under PUD monitoring on Exhibit F, as has been requested and provided by other PUDs utilizing TDR density. Rockedge PUDR—PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 12 of 24 Transportation Element: The project is consistent with Policy 5.1 of the Transportation Element of the Growth Management Plan,which states, "The County Commission shall review all rezone petitions, SRA designation applications, conditional use petitions, and proposed amendments to the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) affecting the overall countywide density or intensity of permissible development, with consideration of their impact on the overall County transportation system, and shall not approve any petition or application that would directly access a deficient roadway segment as identified in the current Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR) or if it impacts an adjacent roadway segment that is deficient as identified in the current AUIR, or which significantly impacts a roadway segment or adjacent roadway segment that is currently operating and/or is projected to operate below an adopted Level of Service (LOS) Standard within the five year AUIR planning period, unless specific mitigating stipulations are also approved A petition or application has significant impacts if the traffic impact statement reveals that any of the following occur: a. For links (roadway segments) directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2 percent of the adopted LOS standard service volume; b. For links adjacent to links directly accessed by the project where project traffic is equal to or exceeds 2 percent of the adopted LOS standard service volume; and c. For all other links the project traffic is considered to be significant up to the point where it is equal to or exceeds 3 percent of the adopted LOS standard service volume. Mitigating stipulations shall be based upon a mitigation plan prepared by the applicant and submitted as part of the traffic impact statement that addresses the project's significant impacts on all roadways. " The proposed development will generate a projected 253± PM peak hour, peak direction trips on the immediately adjacent link, Collier Boulevard(S.R. 951),based on a highest/greatest equivalent residential single family use. Collier Boulevard is a six-lane divided facility and has a current service volume of 3,200 trips, with a remaining capacity of approximately 1,482 trips between Rattlesnake Hammock Road and East Tamiami Trail (S.R. 41); and is currently at LOS "C" as shown in the 2014 Annual Update of Inventory Report (AUIR). Staff also evaluated the LOS for this road segment based on the recently adopted 2015 AUIR which indicates the same service volume of 3,200 trips, remaining capacity of 1,274 trips and the same LOC "C". Therefore, staff finds that the proposed project does not significantly impact adjacent roadway links, there is sufficient capacity to accommodate this PUD Amendment within the 5-year transportation planning period and the petition is consistent with the applicable policies of the transportation element. Conservation and Coastal Management Element (CCME): Environmental Planning staff found this project to be consistent with the Conservation and Coastal Management Element. A minimum of 21.29 acres of native vegetation are required to be retained for the PUD. Rockedge PUDR—PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 13 of 24 CONCLUSION: Based upon the above analysis,the proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. In an effort to support the County Policies discussed above however,staff recommends the following changes: 1. Exhibit C, RPUD Master Plan: An additional Master Plan Note is necessary to clearly indicate that non-vehicular interconnection will be pursued and provided at locations where vehicular interconnection is pursued and will not be provided. Correct the, present labeling near the arrow symbol now appearing at the end of the hammerhead cul-de-sac in the tract adjacent to Collier Boulevard to read, "POTENTIAL FUTURE"INTERCONNECTION". 2. Exhibit F, Development Commitments: Add language to, at the time of the first Site Development Plan involving interconnectivity, at locations where potential future vehicular and/or non-vehicular interconnection/interconnection points are indicated on the RPUD Master Plan, for providing,to the maximum extent feasible,vehicular and/or non-vehicular interconnectivity with abutting roadways and between adjoining sites. This commitment will indicate that the developer shall provide to staff all correspondence between the parties so as to document efforts to interconnect. ANALYSIS: Staff completed a comprehensive evaluation of this land use petition including the criteria upon which a recommendation must be based, specifically noted in Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) Subsection 10.02.13 B.5., Planning Commission Recommendation (commonly referred to as the "PUD Findings"), and Subsection 10.02.08 F., Nature of Requirements of Planning Commission Report(referred to as"Rezone Findings"),which establish the legal bases to support the CCPC's recommendation. The CCPC uses these same criteria as the basis for their recommendation to the BCC, who in turn use the criteria to support their action on the rezoning request. An evaluation relative to these subsections is discussed below, under the heading"Zoning and Land Development Review Analysis."In addition, staff offers the following analyses: Environmental Review: Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed the petition and the PUD document to address environmental concerns. A deviation from setbacks for principal structures from preserves is being requested where side yards abut preserves. Pursuant to Chapter 2, Article VIII, Division 23, Section 2-1193 of the Collier County Codes of Laws and Ordinances,review by the Environmental Advisory Council (EAC) is required, since a deviation from an environmental standard is requested. Staff supports the request for a reduced side yard setback as stated above since sufficient access to the preserve and space for maintenance of adjacent properties have been provided. The structural buffer should prevent encroachment into the preserve from adjacent property owners, Rockedge PURR—PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 14 of 24 Transportation Review: Transportation Division Staff has reviewed the petition request, the PUD document and Master Plan for right-of-way and access issues and is recommending approval. Utility Review: The Utilities Department Staff has reviewed this petition and recommends approval. Fire Review: The Fire Department Staff has reviewed this petition and recommends approval. Collier County Public Schools (CCPS) District Review: CCPS Staff review is not applicable due to the reduction is residential density proposed for Rockedge PUD. Landscaping review: Staff has reviewed this petition and recommends approval. Staff has required the following landscape note on the Master Plan due to the road right of way deviation request and the proposed setback requests. 4.06.05. A.1. Of the LDC requires one (1) tree per 3,000 square feet of pervious area. This would require an area for mature tree growth without being invasive on structures, utilities, and neighboring properties. The Master Plan note states the following: In order to support a canopy tree with a minimum 20 foot plus crown spread as required in LDC Section 4.06.05, individual lots must accommodate enough space for the entire 20 foot canopy to be located wholly within the lot boundaries, except where the lot is adjacent to a lake maintenance easement and/or landscape buffer easement, in which case, a portion of the required 20 foot canopy may protrude into such area. This applies to all residential lots within the PUD. Zoning Division Review: As previously stated, this PUD rezone petition adds 31.91±acres of land zoned Rural Agricultural (A)to an existing Rockedge PUD and relocates the access to Sabal Palm permitting 266 residential units or 2.5 units per acre. Staff has conducted a site visit and finds the proposed single-family development is generally compatible with the surrounding single-family residences, trailer park, reserve/preserve area and landscape nursery. Deviation Discussion: The petitioner is seeking approval of ten deviations from the requirements of the LDC. The deviations are listed in the PUD document. Deviations are a normal derivative of the PUD zoning process following the purpose and intent of the PUD zoning district as set forth in LDC Section 2.03.06 which says in part: It is further the purpose and intent of these PUD regulations to encourage ingenuity, innovation and imagination in the planning, design, and development or redevelopment of relatively large tracts of land under unified ownership or control. PUDs . . . . may depart from the strict application of setback, height, and minimum lot requirements of conventional zoning districts while maintaining minimum standards by which flexibility may be accomplished, and while protecting the public interest. . . . Rockedge PUDR--PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 15 of 24 Please see Attachment D for applicant's deviation justification. Deviation#1 seeks relief from LDC, Section 6.06.01.N which requires minimum local street right- of-way width of 60 feet,to allow a 50-foot right-of-way width for the private internal streets that include public utilities. Staff analysis and recommendation: Staff agrees that narrow roads provide traffic calming functions, reducing speeds and increasing pedestrian safety. However, the road right-of-way also provides the land area for sidewalks, public utilities, street signage, and area for tree growth, providing shade and aesthetics while eliminated tree root damage. Staff researched previous PUD petitions and has confirmed this deviation is commonly approved. Staff has no objection to the request, understanding that this deviation may limit the potential for a shaded and aesthetically pleasing streetscape. Deviation #2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, which permits a maximum wall height of 6- foot in residential zoning districts,to allow a maximum wall height of 8-foot along the perimeter of the project and where abutting an existing public roadway,and allow a 12-foot tall wall/berm combination. Staff analysis and recommendation: Staff concurs with the petitioner's justification noted in Attachment D. This deviation has been approved in other PUD petitions in the past with success. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area and 3 feet in height, to allow a temporary banner sign up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area. The temporary banner sign shall be limited to a maximum of 90 days per calendar year during a season defined as November 1 to April 30.This deviation will remain in force until the project is sold out. Staff analysis and recommendation: Staff concurs with the petitioner's justification noted in Attachment D. This deviation has been approved in other PUD petitions in the past and is deemed reasonable for the size of the project. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5, which requires on-premises directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10 feet from edge of roadway, to allow a setback of 5 feet from the edge of a private roadway/drive aisle. Staff analysis and recommendation: Staff concurs with the petitioner's justification noted in Attachment D. This deviation has been approved in other PUD petitions in the past. Deviation#5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.14, which allows one (1) boundary marker sign or monument structure at each property corner with a sign face no more than 24 square feet,to allow the option of one(1)monument sign along C.R. 951 with a sign face of 64 square feet,rather the two(2)boundary markers that would be allowed per code. Staff analysis and recommendation: Staff concurs with the petitioner's justification noted in Attachment D. This deviation has been approved in other PUD petitions in the past. Rockedge PUDR—PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 16 of 24 Deviation # 6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.04.D.1, which prohibits doors and windows on the zero lot line portion of a dwelling unit,to allow windows. Staff analysis and recommendation: Staff concurs with the petitioner's justification noted in Attachment D.This deviation has been approved in other PUD petitions in the past. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.) which requires cul-de-sac lengths not to exceed 1,000 feet, to allow 2,500 feet for the one cul-de-sac street identified on the RPUD Master Plan. Staff analysis and recommendation: Staff supports this deviation based the geographic limitations of the site and a possible future interconnection on the southwest corner of the project. This deviation has been approved in other PUD petitions in the past. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.3.e which limits temporary use permits for model homes to 3 years, to allow a temporary use permit of 5 years without the need to request approval of a Conditional Use petition. Staff analysis and recommendation: Staff concurs with the petitioner's justification noted in Attachment D.This deviation has been implemented in other PUD petitions in the past. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07.H.3.a., which requires a minimum 25-foot preserve setback for all principal structures to allow a 12.5-foot side yard setback from wetland preserves for principal structures where identified on the RPUD Master Plan. The reduced setback is allowed in combination with a structural buffer as allowed by the SFWMD. Staff analysis and recommendation: Staff concurs with the petitioner's justification noted in Attachment D. Staff supports the request for a reduced side yard setback as stated since sufficient access to the preserve and space for maintenance of adjacent properties have been provided. The structural buffer should prevent encroachment into the preserve from adjacent property owners. Deviation#10 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4,which requires a 20-foot Type D buffer along perimeter boundaries abutting a right-of-way for all developments of 15 acres or more, to a allow a 15-foot Type D buffer adjacent to right-of-ways where identified on the RPUD Master Plan. Staff analysis and recommendation: Staff concurs with the petitioner's justification noted in Attachment D. This deviation is limited in scope to only the narrow road right-of-ways accessing only a few homes with limited traffic. This deviation has been approved in other PUD petitions in the past. Rockedge PUDR—PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 17 of 24 REZONE FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.08 F. states, "When pertaining to the rezoning of land, the report and recommendations to the planning commission to the Board of County Commissioners...shall show that the planning commission has studied and considered proposed change in relation to the following when applicable." Additionally, Section 10.02.13 of the Collier County LDC requires the Planning Commission to make findings as to the PUD Master Plans' compliance with the additional criteria as also noted below: Rezone findings are designated as RZ and PUD findings are designated as PUD. (Staffs responses to these criteria are provided in non-bold font): 1. Whether the proposed change will be consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies and future land use map and the elements of the GMP. The Comprehensive Planning Department has indicated that the proposed PUD amendment is consistent with all applicable elements of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Growth Management Plan(GMP)with the following conditions: 1. Exhibit C, RPUD Master Plan: An additional Master Plan Note is necessary to clearly indicate that non-vehicular interconnection will be pursued and provided at locations where vehicular interconnection is pursued and will not be provided. Correct the present labeling near the arrow symbol now appearing at the end of the hammerhead cul-de-sac in the tract adjacent to Collier Boulevard to read, "POTENTIAL FUTURE"INTERCONNECTION". 2. Exhibit F, Development Commitments: Add language to, at the time of the first Site Development Plan involving interconnectivity, at locations where potential future vehicular and/or non-vehicular interconnection/interconnection points are indicated on the RPUD Master Plan, for providing, to the maximum extent feasible, vehicular and/or non-vehicular interconnectivity with abutting roadways and between adjoining sites. This commitment will indicate that the developer shall provide to staff all correspondence between the parties so as to document efforts to interconnect. 2. The existing land use pattern. As described in the "Surrounding Land Use and Zoning" portion of this report and discussed in the zoning review analysis, the neighborhood's existing land use pattern can be characterized as residential, undeveloped agriculture, trailer park, and landscape nursery. The residential land uses proposed in this PUD petition should not create incompatibility issues. 3. The possible creation of an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. The subject parcel is of sufficient size that it will not result in an isolated district unrelated to adjacent and nearby districts. Rockedge PUDR--PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 18 of 24 4. Whether existing district boundaries are illogically drawn in relation to existing conditions on the property proposed for change. The district boundaries are logically drawn as discussed in Items 2 and 3 above. 5. Whether changed or changing conditions make the passage of the proposed amendment necessary. The proposed change is not necessary,per se; but it is being requested in compliance with the LDC provisions to seek such changes because the petitioner wishes to add additional land and revise the density and residential use types. 6. Whether the proposed change will adversely influence living conditions in the neighborhood. The overall density and intensity of residential land uses allowed by the current PUD are not exceeded in the proposed Pub rezone. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed change will not adversely impact the living conditions in the neighborhood. 7. Whether the proposed change will create or excessively increase traffic congestion or create types of traffic deemed incompatible with surrounding land uses, because of peak volumes or projected types of vehicular traffic, including activity during construction phases of the development, or otherwise affect public safety. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project. The project's development must also comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations and operational improvements when development approvals are sought at time of Site Development Plan(SDP)or Subdivision Platting(PPL)review. 8. Whether the proposed change will create a drainage problem. The proposed development will not create a drainage problem. Furthermore,the project is subject to the requirements of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District. 9. Whether the proposed change will seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. The proposed change will not seriously reduce light and air to adjacent areas. 10. Whether the proposed change would adversely affect property values in the adjacent area. Staff is of the opinion this PUD rezone will not adversely impact property values. However, zoning by itself may or may not affect values, since value determination is driven by market value. Rockedge PU!R—PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 19 of 24 11. Whether the proposed change will be a deterrent to the improvement or development of adjacent property in accordance with existing regulations. Most of the property surrounding the subject site is developed or undergoing construction. The basic premise underlying all of the development standards in the Land Development Code is that their sound application, when combined with the site development plan approval process and/or subdivision process, gives reasonable assurance that a change in zoning will not result in deterrence to improvement or development of adjacent property. Therefore, the proposed zoning change should not be a deterrent to the improvement of adjacent properties. 12. Whether the proposed change will constitute a grant of special privilege to an individual owner as contrasted with the public welfare. The proposed development will comply with the Growth Management Plan which is a public policy statement supporting zoning actions when they are consistent with said Comprehensive Plan. In light of this fact, the proposed change does not constitute a grant of special privilege. Consistency with the FLUE is further determined to be a public welfare relationship because actions consistent with plans are in the public interest. 13. Whether there are substantial reasons why the property cannot be used in accordance with existing zoning. The subject property can be developed within existing zoning. 14. Whether the change suggested is out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or the county. Staff is of the opinion that the proposed PUD rezone is not out of scale with the needs of the neighborhood or county. 15. Whether it is impossible to find other adequate sites in the county for the proposed use in districts already permitting such use. There may be other sites in the County that could accommodate the uses proposed; however, this is not the determining factor when evaluating the appropriateness of a zoning decision. The petition was reviewed on its own merit for compliance with the GMP and the LDC; and staff does not review other sites in conjunction with a specific petition. 16. The physical characteristics of the property and the degree of site alteration which would be required to make the property usable for any of the range of potential uses under the proposed zoning classification. Any development anticipated by the PUD document would require site alteration and these sites will undergo evaluation relative to all federal, state, and local development regulations during the building permit process. Rockedge PUDR—PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 20 of 24 17. The impact of development on the availability of adequate public facilities and services consistent with the levels of service adopted in the Collier County GMP and as defined and implemented through the Collier County adequate public facilities ordinance. The development will have to meet all applicable criteria set forth in the LDC regarding Adequate Public Facilities. The project must also be consistent with all applicable goals and objectives of the GMP regarding adequate public facilities. This petition has been reviewed by county staff that is responsible for jurisdictional elements of the GMP as part of the rezoning process, and that staff has concluded that the developer has provided appropriate commitments so that the impacts of the Level of Service will be minimized. 18. Such other factors, standards, or criteria that the Board of County Commissioners shall deem important in the protection of the public health,safety and welfare. To be determined by the BCC during its advertised public hearing. PUD FINDINGS: LDC Subsection 10.02.13.B.5 states that, "In support of its recommendation, the Planning Commission shall make findings as to the PUD Master Plan's compliance with the following criteria:" 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water,and other utilities. The nearby area is developed or is approved for development of a similar nature. The petitioner will be required to comply with all county regulations regarding drainage, sewer, water and other utilities. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Documents submitted with the application, which were reviewed by the County Attorney's Office, demonstrate unified control of the property. Additionally, the development will be required to gain platting and/or site development plan approval. These processes will ensure that appropriate stipulations for the provision of, continuing operation of, and maintenance of infrastructure will be provided by the developer. Rockedge PUDR—P120140002246 November 23,2015 Page 21 of 24 3. Conformity of the proposed Planned Unit Development with the goals, objectives and policies of the GMP. County Staff has reviewed this petition and has offered an analysis of the relevant goals, objectives and policies of the GMP within the GMP discussion of this staff report. Based on that analysis, staff is of the opinion that this petition can be found consistent with the overall GMP. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. The currently approved development, landscaping and buffering standards were determined to be compatible with the adjacent uses and with the use mixture within the project itself when the PUD was approved. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The existing open space set aside for this project meets the minimum requirement of the LDC. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities,both public and private. The roadway infrastructure has adequate capacity to serve the proposed project at this time, i.e., GMP consistent at the time of rezoning as evaluated as part of the GMP Transportation Element consistency review. The project's development must also comply with all other applicable concurrency management regulations and operational improvements when development approvals are sought at time of Site Development Plan(SDP)review. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. If "ability" implies supporting infrastructure such as wastewater disposal system, potable water supplies, characteristics of the property relative to hazards, and capacity of roads, then the subject property does have the ability to support expansion. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications are justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Not applicable. As previously stated, the changes are to add additional land and an access road into the PUD boundary. NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING(NIM): The agent/applicant duly noticed and held the required NIM on September 28, 2015. Concerns from the attendees were the limited access on Sabal Palm Road and possible road dust during development. For further information,please see Attachment: C-NIM Summary Rockedge PUDR—PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 22 of 24 COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report for Petition PUDR-PL20140002246, Rockedge PUD,revised on November 19, 2015. RECOMMENDATION: Planning and Zoning Review staff recommends that the Collier County Planning Commission • forward Petition PUDR-PL20140002246, Rockedge PUD to the Board of County Commissioners, with a recommendation of approval with the following stipulations: 1. Revise the Master Plan, Exhibit C, to read "Potential Future Interconnection" instead of "Potential Future Interconnect." 2. Add language to Exhibit F as a development commitment to read; At the time of the first Site Development Plan involving interconnectivity, at locations where potential future vehicular and/or non-vehicular interconnection/interconnection points are indicated on the PUD Master Plan, provide, to the maximum extent feasible, vehicular and/or non-vehicular interconnectivity with abutting roadways and between adjoining sites. If interconnection efforts are unsuccessful, the developer shall provide all correspondence between the parties involved to sufficiently document efforts. Attachments: Attachment A: Proposed PUD Ordinance Attachment B: Ordinance Number 06-31 Attachment C:NIM Summary Attachment D: Deviation Justifications Attachment E: Application Attachment F: Pre-Application Notes Attachment G: Addressing Checklist Attachment H: Boundary Survey Attachment I: Traffic Study Attachment J: Cultural Resource Assessment Attachment K:Phase II Cultural Resource Assessment Rockedge PUDR—PL20140002246 November 23,2015 Page 23 of 24 PREPARED BY: /( 41/ts DANIEL JAMES SMITH,AICP DATE PRINCIPAL PLANNER ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: a-4.) r , / t I i% i r- RAYM•p V. LLO S,ZONING MANAGER D TE ZONIN DIVISION MIKE BOSI,AICP,DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION APPROVED BY: FRENCH,DEPUTY DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT 1(); tt.A1/5-- ( C � DAVID S. WILKISON,P . DEPARTMENT HEAD DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Rockedge PUDR—PL20140002246 November 18,2015 Page 23 of 23 ORDINANCE NO. 15- AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2004-41, AS AMENDED, THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BY AMENDING THE APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY FROM THE AGRICULTURAL (A) ZONING DISTRICT AND THE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT TO A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (RPUD) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A 106.44± ACRE PARCEL TO BE KNOWN AS THE ROCKEDGE RPUD TO ALLOW UP TO 266 DWELLING UNITS ON PROPERTY LOCATED NEAR THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE INTERSECTION OF SABAL PALM ROAD AND COLLIER BOULEVARD IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR REPEAL OF ORDINANCE NO. 06-31, THE FORMER ROCKEDGE RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. [PETITION PUDR-PL20150002246] WHEREAS, Patrick Vanasse, AICP of RWA, Inc. and Richard D. Yovanovich, Esquire of COLEMAN YOVANOVICH & KOESTER, P.A. representing Waterman at Rockedge Naples, LLC, (hereinafter "owner" or "developer) petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the herein described property. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE: ZONING CHANGE. The zoning classification of the herein described real property located in Section 23, Township 50 South,Range 26 East,Collier County,Florida is changed from the Agricultural(A) zoning district and the Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district to a Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) zoning district for a 106.44± acre parcel to be known as the Rockedge RPUD in accordance with Exhibits A through H attached hereto and [15-CPS-01429/1221760/1]82 1 of 2 Rockedge PUDA/PUDA-PL20140002246 11/19/15 Attachment A incorporated by reference herein. The appropriate zoning atlas map or maps, as described in Ordinance No. 200441, as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code, is/are hereby amended accordingly. SECTION TWO: REPEAL OF ORDINANCE. Ordinance No.06-31 is hereby repealed in its entirety. SECTION THREE: EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super-majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida,this day of ,2015. ATFEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E.BROCK,CLERK COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA By: By: Deputy Clerk ' TIM NANCE,Chairman Approved as to form and legality: i Heidi Ashton-Cicko ∎\- Managing Assistant County Attorney Attachments: Exhibit A--Permitted Uses Exhibit B—Development Standards Exhibit C—Master Plan Exhibit D—Legal Description Exhibit E—List of Requested Deviations Exhibit F—List of Developer Commitments Exhibit G—Typical Section 50' R.O.W. Exhibit H—Archaelogical Site Locations El 5-CPS-01429/1221760/1]82 2 of 2 Rockedge PUDA/PUDA-PL20140002246 11/19/15 EXHIBIT A Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development Regulations for development of the Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Ordinance and applicable sections of the Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of Site Development Plan or Subdivision Plat. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. MAXIMUM DENSITY: There shall be no more than 266 residential dwelling units permitted on the F 106.44 gross acres, resulting in a maximum density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre. This PUD allows a base density of 1.5 units per acre or 160 dwelling units, and pursuant to the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict provisions of the Growth Management Plan, an additional 106 units are derived from Transfer of Development Rights(TDR). Redemption of TDR credits shall be per LDC Section 2.03.07.D.4(g). PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part,for other than the following: I. GENERAL PERMITTED USES Guardhouses, gatehouses, access control structures, clock towers, fences, walls, columns, decorative hardscaping or architectural embellishments associated with the project's entrance features are permitted within the "R" designated area abutting the project's entrance, or within the private roadway as depicted on the PUD Master Plan, and shall have no required setbacks; however, such structures cannot be located where they create vehicular stacking or sight distance issues for motorists and pedestrians, and cannot exceed 35' in actual height. II. RESIDENTIAL A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family, detached 2. Single family,attached 3. Single family,zero lot line 4. Townhouse 5. Multi-family Page 1 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT A Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 6. Temporary model homes 7. Model sales center 8. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner,as applicable. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to swimming pools, spas, screen enclosures,private garages, and other recreational facilities. 2. Gatehouses and other access control structures. 3. Utility and water management facilities 4. Walls,berms,and signs. 5. Project sales, construction and administrative offices that may occur in residential and/or temporary structures. 6. Passive open space uses and structures, such as but not limited to landscaped areas, gazebos,park benches and walking trails. 7. Storage areas, for the exclusive use of the residents. 8. Community maintenance areas, and maintenance structures. 9. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner,as applicable. III. RECREATION AREA A. Principal Uses: 1. Structures intended to provide social and recreational space for the private use of the residents and their guests. 2. Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool,tennis and basketball courts, playgrounds, pedestrian/bicycle pathways, and water features. Page 2 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPCiD EXHIBIT A Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 3. Passive open space uses and structures, such as but not limited to landscaped areas,gazebos,park benches and walking trails. 4. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA")or Hearing Examiner,as applicable. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Community maintenance areas, and maintenance structures. 2. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA")or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. IV. PRESERVE AREA A. Permitted Uses: 1. Native preserves 2. Uses and structures that will not reduce the native preservation requirements, such as boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos, benches and viewing platforms, subject to approval by the permitting agencies and in accordance with the LDC. 3. Drainage and water management structures that will not reduce the native preservation requirement. 4. Any other conservation use or structure which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses, within a preserve, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals("BZA")or Hearing Examiner,as applicable. 5. Activities in the archaeological areas within the Preserve shall be in accordance with Exhibit F and the LDC. Page 3 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD EXHIBIT B Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for the RPUD Residential Subdistrict and Recreation Area Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the site development plan (SDP)or subdivision plat. DEVELOPMENT SINGLE SINGLE DUPLEX& _. TOWNHOUSE8 MULTI-, RECREATION STANDARDS FAMILY FAMILY TWO FAMILY DETACHED8 ATTACHED& FAMILY SINGLE FAMILY ZERO`!LOT .. j LINE' PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA 4,000 S.F. 3,500 S.F. 3,500 S.F. 1,600 S.F. PER N/A N/A PER UNIT UNIT MIN.LOT WIDTH t 40 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 16 FEET N/A N/A MIN. FRONT YARD 2.3 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET MIN.SIDE YARD 5 FEET 0 OR 10 FEET 0 AND 5 FEET 0 AND 5 FEET 10 FEET 1/2 BH MIN. REAR YARD 6.7 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MIN.PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 10 FEET 10 FEET 0 OR 10 FEET 0 OR 10 FEET 20 FEET 1/2 sum of the BH STRUCTURES4 MAX. ZONED BUILDING 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 45 FEET 35 FEET HEIGHT MAX.ACTUAL BUILDING 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 55 FEET 40 FEET HEIGHT ACCESSORY STRUCTURES MIN. FRONT YARD SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS MIN.SIDE YARD SPS SPS SPS5 SPS5 SPS SPS MIN. REAR YARD 6,7 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 0 FEET MIN.PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MAX.ZONED BUILDING 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET HEIGHT MAX.ACTUAL BUILDING 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET HEIGHT RH: Building Height(zoned height) SPS:Same as Principal Structure Page 4 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPLID PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT B Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 1. The minimum lot width may be reduced by 20%,provided the minimum lot area requirement shall be maintained. 2. For multi-family product the front yard setbacks shall be measured from back of curb,or edge of pavement if not curbed. For all other unit types,front yard setbacks shall be measured from ROW line. The minimum 15'front yard setback may be reduced to 10'where the unit has a recessed or side-entry garage. Front-loading garages shall be set back a minimum of 23 feet from edge of sidewalk. 3. For corner lots,only I front yard setback shall be required. The yard that does not contain the driveway shall provide a minimum 10'setback. 4. The minimum distance between buildings may be reduced to 0' where attached garages are provided. However, the principal structures shall maintain a 10'minimum separation. 5. Accessory pool cage setbacks may be reduced to 0 feet when attached to a common privacy wall. 6. H single family development Is pursued through the County's plat process,LMEs and LBEs will be platted as separate tracts. 7. When a lot abuts a lake maintenance easement(LME) or landscape buffer easement(LBE),the minimum rear yard shall be measured from the easement.Otherwise,the minimum rear yard shall be measured from the parcel boundaries. 8. In order to support a canopy tree with a minimum 20-foot crown spread as required in LDC Section 4.06.05,individual lots must accommodate enough space for the entire 20-foot canopy to be located wholly within the lot boundaries,except where the lot is adjacent to a lake maintenance easement and/or landscape buffer easement, in which case, a portion of the required 20-foot canopy may protrude into such area.Applies to all residential lots within the PUD. Page 5 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT C I il ROCKEDGE e LEGEND . : I :,, Z°NING:TTRVC RIDUD MASTER PLAN R RESIDENTIAL !, CURRENT LAND USE:RV I ' I PARK • .... .... ..... ... .... RECREATIONAL• RA - __ ___ _. ..,. ..... ...._ 1011241 ROAD . AREA - '-- - -- - -- .-- P PRESERVE 1 c----c__,, PROPERTY -\ i ri:::..!!:.1::1A 1 '1 TRAFFIC FLOW BOUNDARY \ •;.:!..!!..!..„:;-,-I -''--- . , . --..- PATTERN J I , - 1 ,. . 1 1 -11 ( ) DEVIATIONS : •I LI 151YPE • 1' '''' :1 I 20N9413: '6"BUFFER 4'' '1 :1 • WATER A-AGRICULTURAL 12;:.,!,!.. :1.1 1 " :- ,t'''. -. , MANAGEMENT LAKE (SCATTERED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) 1:!! .:11 ,70,:,,,;,, ARCHAEOLOGICAL 11 1 I i''',EL'.::•:11,..!!1.:11 : •".4 AREA 20'AMIN RD ESMT.& —5'DRAINAGE SWALE E5MT. . , 1 . . PRESERVE MA1NT AGREEMENT 0.MAINE AGREEMENT O.R /I.:,..2.1'.'7i 1 I BOUNDARY ..:. ..;-,. OR 2826 PG.2485 2826 PG.2485 CI j --- L.-.. 1 1 k MARKER J 1 k lo) 15'TYPE R 15'TYPE "C"SUFFER t LAND USE SUMMARY ly.-; 'Er BuFFEJI =_ _ - - -1 - TRACT LAND USE ACREAGE 15'TYPE II II ' TRACT-51.: RESIDENTIAL 58.43*4-AC . r• !. R 13 'BUFFER RA -± 1 i ; N TRACT^P..PRESERVE 24 — — — 1 tLi TRATRACT"IRA* LAICEANRECREAATITE°:mANAGAREA EmENT 100.E+++1;1:AAACCq 3,1 k Hi T _ _____ ZONINQA-AGRICULTURE t ACCESS ORNEJ R.O.W. 12,64+/-AC Ra ti i r, 1. 1 I CLJRRENT LAND USE:SINGLE PAIVILY i I i.. TOTAL 100.14.1-AC 1 i 1,:i ; 20'TYPE RESIDENTIAL,VACANT LAND I - il "Ir BUFFER 15,rIpt --*--'1 PROPERTY BOUNDARY i L _B•BUFFER ....... , , . 266MARMESUMETEDhEITNIALSITYDWELUNG UNITS ' 150 DWELLING UNITS DERIVED FROM R 1 . ,• BASE 1. 1 ■'-'!1 i ■ R 1 7is-rffluFFEER 1 . 1 q DENSITY;106 FROM TORS 0 1 -._,. • : . 0 : v , , i . 11 . , 170'FPL I RPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES i 1 i I i-PROPERTY , EAsEttian.: I 1.WITHIN THE RPUD BOUNDARIES THERE WILL BE ---:=-------. of' BOUNDARY ' i(7::::-.777:-.77':i.:....":tt"711 1 1._ . .. „. . ... , . . . , . - ! wt 678. A MINIMUM OF 60%OPEN SPACE, i PG.1765 ZONING:A- ' : 2.THE FACLITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ,•.....:..:„.;;!•--!!!‘".1111: : ! 1 AGRICULTURE 1 ON THIS PUD MASTER PLAN SHALL BE '1' I 20'---1--4,;...: -.•.:=1,..,,:',.''..:•:•:•., CURRENT LAND USE ', CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. 1 1 i LME I 1:1'.:..:...-.':-;.]:.,...:,.I.,... ,',.. SINGLE FAMILY I I ' "...,....:;.i.; ;:.,!....„,.;;,;;;.-: RESIDENTIAL,VACANT C) , ,&THE DESIGN,LOCATION,AND CONFIGURATION (WL,.'LL.:')::::.' ' LAND: 1 ) I OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE ; , . .,. D, EFINED AT EIMER PRELIMINARY ■■ „I : 1 i 1 i : SUBDIVISION PLAT APPROVAL,OR -*-1 '.-10'TYPE 15'TYPE I ' '1 CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL .; ... W BUFFER 'r BUFFER 15 tYPE ■ A .0.BUFFER'I t! 4.REQUIRED PRESERVE:21.29 AC(25%OF 85.17 's f 4...**—POTENTIAL FUTURE I I INTERCONNECT OF EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION. :g 9• ' ' PRESERVE:PROVIDED:2420 AC I ZONING:A• 1 i t AGRICULTURAL il• ,; — 0 5. BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION(S)TO CURRENT LAND USE: I — ! ! TIE MULTI-USE PATH ALONG COLLIER NURSERY ! ! : BO'RaW BOULEVARD ,.., ;. . . . fl i A BUFFER ' OA 3 MAY BE PROVIDED AT TIME OF PPL OR SDP. i I : PG.2511 11 ROPERTY PROPERTY BOUNDARY . . , ■ T'EAsEMENT...,. il S. MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFERING BOUNDARY ZONING:A.AGRICULTURALSAELROSE ROW i'"'"`'"""`; ill REQUIREMENTS MAY BE MET WITH EXISTING CURRENT LAND USE:NURSERY ! L PRESERVE.WHERE THE PRESERVE DOES NOT ----- -•--- -trARALrAtiiRoAD --- -t- -:1- - , , MEET THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFERING Z'ONING:PUD,VANDiiiticymest - ------ ---4. REQUIREMENTS,PLANTING TO MEET TliESE CURRENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL,VERONA .0 REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE REQUIRED. . -..o 1 as WIWI..lirt Own Suia3213 Mapin P..5110 WATERMEN AT ROC KEDGE ROCKEDGE aa.., P134 WOOS PK CM B7 4574 NAPLES,ILC RPUD ? PPP Z.4,1410e0UITI c omit.= SP( FY. .444. ZNOIME111114.2 Vtriati"". wat 1 MU%POND COUIT1 COM .10,415 SPC P' PIfflinS , MASTER PLAN '-"orotris• --Mort.L."'".„.., ..„... ,..... . ..„....... ,P.P16 44,801 9C •4 •.1204.1010-01 PRIOR..7 AM MS 1 s t ....r.uartamem.... .----..------.......---9--, Page 6 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT C ROCKEDGE HACENDA COLLIER REGIONAL RPUEI MASTER-PLAN CURRENT LAND USE SINGLE LAKES Y MEDICAL CENTER CURRENT LAND USE PRESERVE RESIDENTIAL SUB-DDIVISION _... _.. r+A -^-�'' •�C i•!•�" fir . .._ _.. 130'ROADWAY ... . w • . W' .. W �_— __is EASEMENTO.R635 • • + w • w w w.. � ' 15'TYPE R `B"BUFFER PG 1273- r w i i W J•' W w 'D"BUFFER ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE • • • • • • • • • W` CURRENT LAND USE SINGLE [ •:W • W • i -R 1 FAMILY RESIDENTIAL • •• •• •• •• •i • ••• • IW w i W i W W R { J_ - 4 _ _ .� y y W i P: w W WI ZONING:MPUD. 14-1-1 1 I . . • W • W .. . . w W . HACIENDA LACES 36 R 13 TYPE y� i • . CURRENT LAND USE WIDE I 1 { `'B'BUFFER • • i • • W• • W • Y SINGLE FAMILY M , i � FO:BIDBdfU1L { • W . .. ( SUBDIVISION PG.1132 �� / .. . w •.1a4^11W .w i JI . I; O.R.1115 \' 1•A• ♦+•+i• • 1ti•C• ' PG.1006 1 '.sue �i1i01'4,1%iJ•,•`• W •+••• •• • PROPERTY i O R]A6 -. O ri OiiO••iiiii 444�i''i1 "+• " � BOUNDARY i I 3,f ti. •��' 1+ •011+11 4+++• w +1R5 w w PG•584 1 +i i 4iOM+*e�+�i*+�++0i�+gip r•++e+ w J { { ••i+•:•),....4..414.44 +•ia +•i•W W • ZONING:A- 1 �VACAIEII ii ,W��'.:. �iy:.:;oaf•°• W '� •• •4;:f4 ii+° i• W • w 1 AGRICULTURE { %i :�%i•1:14. • . W p..., w • J CURRENT LAND {I 20 `14:00:�„*. W ., w w 5+�` O•, o W W USE:SINGLE {{ 1{ IME I !.:+:+:e41i• • • . sR�•Ov w w i W •I FAMILY 1 CPi•O• w W Vie•�1�i W W RESIDENTIAL SL 1 ..� `V• W W i W • i • W i i • =r� R 4 4 0W0 W W • W W • W t i W • w �w W W W W A-AGRICULTURE II ' W• y 4. 4 W • w wi W J CURRENT LAND USE: : D- w \ .:*mo.. i W W W i • • W w VACANT LAND — — ~ r .r; o. • W • W • .r r 16 TYPE 15'TYPE W A....•+1+11•• w • W W •' w w W +. W "B BUFFER W •i• 4 0+i1i4+ • • • W i 4:4,1:1 I � 4ti+•1 11++++1+1+1 i+1W • • w * V W 1+R1, J. i Piee•;„t ti •A. W ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE /' I J `PROPERTY BOUNDARY I CURRENT LAND INSE:SINGLE FAIRLY /,/,, 1 RESIDENTIAL,VACANT LAND //� I POTENTIAL FUTURE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN / ✓ — { INTERCONNECTION �i f (( 20. 1 iI{! ZONING A•AORIGULTURE l me PROPERTY BOUNDARY-. ,. ��” —" CURRENT LAND USE:NURSERY/SINGLE / FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R --15'TYPE 7 J. 'B'BUFFER LEGEND 1. 1s TYPE / `D'BUFFS / 1 I LROPERTY R RESIDENTIAL R r15'TYPE RA RECREATIONAL - ,, "B"MIFFER BOUNDARY AREA. 1., 0 R P PRESERVE �. ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE TRAFFIC FLOW ,e,BUFFER CURRENT LAND USE -- PATTERN 1 j� R �� 11 "35 TYPE NURSERY O DEVIATIONS 0- 1 l 'B BUFFER ''''\\ WATER �� ( JJJ `PROPERTY BOUNDARY L" MANAGEMENT LAKE LME:{ ,j ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE !•!•Ti!4 AREA 1L_____1 1 I CURRENT ANT LANDSE. tV IS'TYPE r.'. PRESERVE B�BUFFER BOUNDARY Q I.... ..T ..._. �.._. SABALPALMROD _.. ` MARKER ./ 'D•BUFFER • W "*" t.77.'..„. •Rua. ROCKEDGE. ENC`t Nita N�o WATERMEN AT ROCKEDGE ��JnS ��^,• NAPLES:LLC. RPUD 2 pKASNO WAND COUTYCO1NNM5 EIaW®�ucl..MbhNU .nc WC w Ed5v1s eN6pNeeuNO use ' 1 PERLA AOWDCOUNT COWEN'S SPC w 0455/u ,—„" ry'lt .!.."-Moo "�"N/A 23-505 ZE MASTER RAN `M1SVe NNRfE ..w via• .H ♦` `M• 1.uw SPC I♦ •,13N0p00M -YRPIApS.W 11LL5 as ••"•3'y5= i r.rKaNf•wisxfwwy.M-YN M.S111 MMw..,.wr�.1.!.....al_ Page 7 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT D Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 664.25 FEET ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF TRACT "F1" OF THE PLAT OF ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55, PAGE 1, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA; THENCE S01°14'38"W FOR 675.75 FEET ON SAID WEST LINE OF TRACT "Fl" TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT"Fl"; THENCE S01°14'14"W ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 675.73 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S89°42'08"W ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 662.30 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4466, PAGE 3476, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE EAST AND SOUTH LINES OF SAID PARCEL: 1. S01°09'56"W FOR 617.91 FEET; 2. N89°34'54"W FOR 300.19 FEET; 3. S01°09'09"W FOR 435.95 FEET; 4. N89°34'09"W FOR 150.16 FEET; 5. N89°38'05"W FOR 210.56 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (E-1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°05'19"E ON SAID WEST LINE FOR 43.72 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (S-1/2) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°48'02"W ON SAID NORTH LINE FOR 15.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4970,PAGE 3362, SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FOUR BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE SOUTH, WEST AND NORTH LINES OF SAID PARCEL 1: 1. S01°05'19"W ON SAID EAST LINE FOR 303.80 FEET; 2. N89°37'28"W FOR 645.47 FEET; 3. N01°01'07"E FOR 302.01 FEET Page 8 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT D Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 4. S89°47'35"E FOR 30.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND RECORDED IN IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4466, PAGE 3476, SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL: 1. N01°01'01"E FOR 218.98 FEET; 2. N52°35'40"E FOR 646.23 FEET; 3. N40°29'08"W FOR 30.05 FEET; 4. N49°40'54"E FOR 22.10 FEET; 5. THENCE N36°22'15"E FOR 436.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°42'08"W ON SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 785.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°01'Ol"E FOR 332.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°32'04"W FOR 994.18 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°42'08"E FOR 331.15 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°56'29"W FOR 660.13 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°57'42"W FOR 330.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; Page 9 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT D Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development THENCE N89°4735"W ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 230.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 100 FEET EAST OF (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR)AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N00°51153"E ON SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1642.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/2) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°22'01"E FOR 894.88 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N00°58'45"E FOR 662.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST(NE-1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 996.40 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF (E-1/2) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S01°05'30"W ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 328.19 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 328.19 FEET SOUTH OF (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR)AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N89°01'53"E ON SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 663.85 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (E-1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE NOI°10'38"E ON SAID EAST LINE FOR 328.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS THAT PART OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 321, PAGE 259, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL CONTAINS 106.44 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. BEARINGS HEREINABOVE MENTIONED ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST TO BEAR NORTH 89°01'58"EAST. Page 10 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT E Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development LIST OF DEVIATIONS Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC, Section 6.06.01.N which requires minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet, to allow a 50' right-of-way width for the private internal streets that include public utilities. Deviation#2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C,which permits a maximum wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts,to allow a maximum wall height of 8' along the perimeter of the project, and allow a 12' tall wall/berm combination where abutting an existing public roadway. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height,to allow a temporary banner sign up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area. The temporary banner sign shall be limited to maximum of 90 days per calendar year during season defined as November 1 to April 30. This deviation will remain in force until the project is sold out. Deviation#4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5, which requires on-premises directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10' from edge of roadway, to allow a setback of 5' from the edge of a private roadway/drive aisle. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.14, which allows one (1) boundary marker sign or monument structure at each property corner with a sign face no more than 24 square feet, to allow the option of one (1) monument sign along C.R. 951 with a sign face of 64 square feet,rather the two(2)boundary markers that would be allowed per code. Deviation # 6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.04.D.1, which prohibits doors and windows on the zero lot line portion of a dwelling unit,to allow windows. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.) which requires cul-de-sac lengths not to exceed 1,000 feet, to allow 2,500 feet for the one cul-de-sac street identified on the RPUD Master Plan Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.3.e which limits temporary use permits for model homes to 3 years, to allow a temporary use permit of 5 years without the need to request approval of a Conditional Use petition. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07.H.3.a., which requires a minimum 25' preserve setback for all principal structures to allow a 12.5' side yard setback from wetland preserves for principal structures where identified on the RPUD Master Plan. The reduced setback is allowed in combination with a structural buffer as allowed by the SFWMD. Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4, which requires a 20' Type D buffer along perimeter boundaries abutting a right-of-way for all developments of 15 acres or more,to a allow a 15' Type D buffer adjacent to right-of-ways where identified on the RPUD Master Plan Page 11 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT F Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS PUD MONITORING: One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval,the Managing Entity is Watermen at Rockedge Naples, LLC or its assigns. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts,the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. Commencing with submittal of the first development order that utilizes TDR credits, a TDR calculation sheet shall be submitted documenting that the owner has acquired all TDR credits needed for that portion of the development. The calculation sheet tracks the chronological assignment of TDR credits with respect to all subsequent development orders until the maximum density allowed by the utilization of TDR credits has been reached (all TDR credits allowing residential development reach a zero balance). TRANSPORTATION: A. At the request of Collier County, a Collier Area Transit (CAT)bus stop with shelter will be installed by the developer at no cost to the County. The exact location will be determined during site development plan review; however, every effort shall be made for co-utilization of the CAT stop for a school bus pick-up and drop-off. This shall be coordinated with the Collier County School District. If co-utilization is determined not to be feasible, then a site for school bus drop-off and pick-up shall be provided internal to the site. B. The owner, and its successors or assigns will be responsible a proportionate share of signalization and intersection improvements at Sabal Palm Road and Collier Boulevard (CR 951),when warranted. C. The Rockedge PUD Transportation Impact Study was based on a development scenario of 266 single-family detached units. The total trip generation was estimated in the TIS to be 253 PM peak hour two-way external trips based on ITE trip generation rates. The development scenario of 266 single-family detached units may change. However, the Project's estimated trip generation will not exceed a maximum of 253 PM peak hour two-way external trips. Page 12 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT F Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development ENVIRONMENTAL: A. Project has 81.81 acres of native vegetation. 3.36 acres of non-native area have been included in the native vegetation preserve requirements due to a past clearing violation by previous owners. Native vegetation requirement is based on the 81.81 acres plus the 3.36 acres or 85.17 acres total. 25%of 85.17 results in a preserve requirement of 21.29 acres. The project is preserving 24.2 acres which is more than required. ARCHAEOLOGICAL: In 2014, a Phase I cultural resource assessment of the site was conducted by Robert S. Carr, M.S., of the Archeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. This assessment(A Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment of the Rockedge Parcel, AHC Technical Report #1024) is a revised and expanded phase of work that follows a 2003 assessment of a portion of the Rockedge parcel. Seven previously recorded sites (CR726, CR873, CR874, CR875, CR896, CR897, CR898) and two previously unrecorded sites (CR1371, CR1372) were documented. Based on the discovery of CR1371, a small black earth midden, a Phase II assessment was completed and the report (A Phase II Cultural Resource Assessment of Rockedge #2, Site 8CR1371,AHC Technical Report #1044). Letters concurring with the findings, results, and recommendations (including Phase III mitigation)of the two reports were received on 12/31/15 and 3/04/15 respectively. In accordance with the Phase 1 assessment: A. Prior to any clearing or grubbing activities within 100 feet of the archaeological preserves labeled "to be preserved" or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map, a temporary construction fence shall be placed around the preserve areas. B. Any clearing of exotic vegetation within the archaeological preserve labeled "to be preserved"or"designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map s shall be conducted by hand. No mechanical equipment shall be used within the archaeological preserves for clearing or debris removal. C. All activities of clearing, grubbing, and subsurface alterations such as digging for utilities ditches, water management lakes, roads and the like that are located within 90 feet of the archaeological preserves labeled"to be preserved" or"designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map and archaeological sites labeled "not eligible to be preserved" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map shall be subject to archaeological monitoring. D. The site plan shows archaeological areas within the preserves labeled "to be preserved" or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map. No storage of fill, equipment or supplies shall be placed in the archaeological areas within the native vegetation preserve. Page 13 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT F Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development E. Should any replanting or landscaping be permitted or required within the archaeological preserves labeled "to be preserved" or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map,such activity shall be coordinated with and monitored by an archaeologist. F. If any archaeological features or artifacts are discovered during construction or development activities in the Rockedge RPUD, all development and construction activities shall cease at that location until the site has been examined by an archaeologist and necessary efforts to protect and/or document such resources have been implemented. G. If additional human remains are discovered within the Rockedge RPUD, then the provisions of Florida Statutes Section 872.05—laws governing the treatment of unmarked human burials—shall apply. Page 14 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPM PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT A Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development Regulations for development of the Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Ordinance and applicable sections of the Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of Site Development Plan or Subdivision Plat. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. MAXIMUM DENSITY: There shall be no more than 266 residential dwelling units permitted on the± 106.44 gross acres, resulting in a maximum density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre. This PUD allows a base density of 1.5 units per acre or 160 dwelling units, and pursuant to the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict provisions of the Growth Management Plan, an additional 106 units are derived from Transfer of Development Rights (TDR). Redemption of TDR credits shall be per LDC Section 2.03.07.D.4(g). PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: I. GENERAL PERMITTED USES Guardhouses, gatehouses, access control structures, clock towers, fences, walls, columns, decorative hardscaping or architectural embellishments associated with the project's entrance features are permitted within the "R" designated area abutting the project's entrance, or within the private roadway as depicted on the PUD Master Plan, and shall have no required setbacks; however, such structures cannot be located where they create vehicular stacking or sight distance issues for motorists and pedestrians, and cannot exceed 35' in actual height. II. RESIDENTIAL A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family, detached 2. Single family,attached 3. Single family,zero lot line 4. Townhouse 5. Multi-family Page 1 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT A Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 6. Temporary model homes 7. Model sales center 8. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA")or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to swimming pools, spas, screen enclosures, private garages,and other recreational facilities. 2. Gatehouses and other access control structures. 3. Utility and water management facilities 4. Walls,berms,and signs. 5. Project sales, construction and administrative offices that may occur in residential and/or temporary structures. 6. Passive open space uses and structures, such as but not limited to landscaped areas, gazebos,park benches and walking trails. 7. Storage areas,for the exclusive use of the residents. 8. Community maintenance areas, and maintenance structures. 9. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA")or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. III. RECREATION AREA A. Principal Uses: 1. Structures intended to provide social and recreational space for the private use of the residents and their guests. 2. Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool,tennis and basketball courts, playgrounds, pedestrian/bicycle pathways, and water features. Page 2 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD EXHIBIT A Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 3. Passive open space uses and structures, such as but not limited to landscaped areas, gazebos,park benches and walking trails. 4. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA")or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Community maintenance areas, and maintenance structures. 2. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA")or Hearing Examiner,as applicable. IV. PRESERVE AREA A. Permitted Uses: 1. Native preserves 2. Uses and structures that will not reduce the native preservation requirements, such as boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos, benches and viewing platforms, subject to approval by the permitting agencies and in accordance with the LDC. 3. Drainage and water management structures that will not reduce the native preservation requirement. 4. Any other conservation use or structure which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses, within a preserve, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals("BZA")or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. 5. Activities in the archaeological areas within the Preserve shall be in accordance with Exhibit F and the LDC. Page 3 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD EXHIBIT B Rockedge Residential PIanned Unit Development DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for the RPUD Residential Subdistrict and Recreation Area Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the site development plan (SDP) or subdivision plat. DEVELOPMENT , SINGLE SINGLE DUPLEX& TOWNHOUSE" MULTI- RECREATION STANDARDS , FAMILY FAMILY TWO- FAMILY DETACHED' ATTACHED& FAMILY' SINGLE FAMILY ZERO LOT LINE" PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA 4,000 S.F. 3,500 S.F. 3,500 S.F. 1,600 S.F. PER N/A N/A PER UNIT UNIT MIN. LOT WIDTH 1 40 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 16 FEET N/A N/A MIN. FRONT YARD 2,3 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET MIN.SIDE YARD 5 FEET 0 OR10 FEET 0 AND 5 FEET 0 AND 5 FEET 10 FEET 1/2 BH MIN. REAR YARD 6,7 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MIN. PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 10 FEET 10 FEET 0 OR 10 FEET 0 OR 10 FEET 20 FEET 1/2 sum of the BH STRUCTURES4 MAX. ZONED BUILDING 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 45 FEET 35 FEET HEIGHT MAX.ACTUAL BUILDING 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 55 FEET 40 FEET HEIGHT ACCESSORY STRUCTURES MIN. FRONT YARD SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS MIN.SIDE YARD SPS SPS SPS5 SPS5 SPS SPS MIN. REAR YARD 6.7 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 0 FEET MIN. PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MAX.ZONED BUILDING 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET HEIGHT MAX.ACTUAL BUILDING 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET HEIGHT BH: Building Height(zoned height) SPS:Same as Principal Structure Page 4 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT B Rockedge Residential PIanned Unit Development 1. The minimum lot width may be reduced by 20%,provided the minimum lot area requirement shall be maintained. 2. For multi-family product the front yard setbacks shall be measured from back of curb,or edge of pavement if not curbed. For all other unit types,front yard setbacks shall be measured from ROW line. The minimum 15'front yard setback may be reduced to 10'where the unit has a recessed or side-entry garage. Front-loading garages shall be set back a minimum of 23 feet from edge of sidewalk. 3. For corner lots,only 1 front yard setback shall be required. The yard that does not contain the driveway shall provide a minimum 10'setback. 4. The minimum distance between buildings may be reduced to 0' where attached garages are provided. However, the principal structures shall maintain a 10'minimum separation. 5. Accessory pool cage setbacks may be reduced to 0 feet when attached to a common privacy wall. 6. If single family development is pursued through the County's plat process,LMEs and LBEs will be platted as separate tracts. 7. When a lot abuts a lake maintenance easement(LME) or landscape buffer easement(IBE),the minimum rear yard shall be measured from the easement.Otherwise,the minimum rear yard shall be measured from the parcel boundaries. 8. In order to support a canopy tree with a minimum 20-foot crown spread as required in LDC Section 4.06.05,individual lots must accommodate enough space for the entire 20-foot canopy to be located wholly within the lot boundaries,except where the lot is adjacent to a lake maintenance easement and/or landscape buffer easement, in which case, a portion of the required 20-foot canopy may protrude into such area.Applies to all residential lots within the PUD. Page 5 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPM PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT C • .. i ROCKEDGE e LEGEND . , i I CURRENT'.,. ZONING:TTRVC RV RPUD MASTER PLAN R R ESIDENTIAL 1, LAND USE: i I PARK . I i ! RECREATIONAL . ........... ...... ..... .-- ....;. .;;;, ' •-• RA ;min RoAn AREA . ; ] ; p PRESERVE PROPERTY -\ IT 7:-.1. TRAFFIC FLOW BOUNDARY \ .;;;;,:; ;;, - I -............ • i ii IC:.:',!::!,:• !!11 — PATTERN I EB 1 d j ZONING: WIYPE 1•::: ".!'':i 1 '‘r. UFFER -.C,H.:•::.-.:*:1 I :1 T 1 WATER A-AGRICULTURAL 1:,'-:,,:ttrff-2°. ]I I MANAGEMENT LAKE ! I (SCAT T=SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) ' El I LME i win....4 ARCHAEOLOGICAL 1 I '-— Vit**4 AREA A r... PRESERVE ; a 1 20,Awry RD Eshit& -5'DRAINAGE SWALE ESMT. .•• • ] , 1 1 , MAINTAGREEMENT m MAINT.AGREEM E NT os. I.::::=:: ,1 I 1 BOUNDARY OR 2826 pG.2485 2826 P0.2465 0 • jUsA I . MARKER J . ] " I 11 1.0) 15'TYPE R ] .. ., 7.5•TYPE 1 al Cr BUFFER -13-BUFFER i i t LAND.USE SUMMARY IiIII I I ---:--.: _ _ , ] —: TRACT LAND USE ACREAGE RA !15 7YPE '11-BUFFER • 1 LI TRACT le, RESIDENTIAL a) 56.43+/-Ac R i : Lui TRACT"p"• PRESERVE 2420+I-AC 1 11' r _ _ __ ---I-- - 0,91+1-AC 11 I s TRACT"RA''RECREATION AREA Llui TOTAL LAKEJWATER MANAGEm ENT 1028+1-AO ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE , I • L AccESS DRIVE/FLO.W. 12.64+1-AO I I I!] S 1 I CURRENT LAND USE:SINGLE FAMILY I OTAL 108.44+1-AC 1---F-.20'lyPE RESIDENTIAL,VACANT LAND i 1 1 1 I :I i i BUFFER ---: MAXIMUM DENSITY I Ii III ] I - giu' FFER PROPERTBOUND 1 _ARY -- Y 1 — ;-... 266 RESIDENTIAL,DWELLING UNITS i 2 fi 7 1 160 DWELUNG UNITS DERIVED FROM R I 1 . . . , BASE i_is.TypE ` =_.... --) R "B''BUFFER; I I • I DENSITY;106 FROM TOR'S = 1 i Q.- 1 . . . . t ; I RPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES ! li J ,--PROPERTY ! ! ; 170'FpL i :EAsEm ENT: I 1.WITHIN THERE THE RPUD BOUNDARIES ERE WILL BE —!---- 7 --. BOUNDARY I I "I 02.676, ! A MINIMUM OF 60%OPEN SPACE. PG.1765 9 .;;;!;;;;;;;;'];]-;.•:.;...;;,•;; ZONING:11- : ; 2.THE FACIUTIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN ; .,.;;;;].2;!:;;:1;:;.:;.-.;;;;;;; ;;;:i i AGRICULTURE .1 I ON THIS PUD MASTER PLAN SHALL BE 1 1! •' ' I 20'4142].::.-...-:, ,,,,-L,-.L]..;;;,];].;]-;; CURRENT LAND USE i ) CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE L2E I I SINGLE FAMILY ; 1 i 1 0 ': •";.•:.;:;_,..::',.!_•:--:;•:;._;:::.::..:1 RESIDENTIAL,VACANT ' ' 1 3.THE DESIGN,LOCATION,AND CONFIGURATION ' : Lf:L.',L.-,::..L,.:•':---'• LAND j j 1 OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE I DEFINED AT EMHER PRELIMINARY , t ' SUBDIVISION PLAT APPROVAL,OR It 10'rn4 15 TYPE I I-1 CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT.APPROVAL 'Iv BUFFER 'r BUFFER U ] 15!'TYPE i -.. 4t....—POTENTIAL FUTURE 5; .-D•BuFFE11-; 4.REQUIRED.PRESERVE:21.211 AC(25%OF 85.17 gp INTERCONNECT AC OF EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION. PRESERVE PROVIDED:2420 AC i 11[ I BONIN&A- i I 1 I AGRICULTURAL : 5. BICYCLE)PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION(S)TO CURRENT LAND USE I II THE MULTI-USE PATH ALONG COLLIER IC?TYPE NURSERY : 30'RA; • BOULEVARD ! 1 i •AL"BUFFER (1]Fl 321---,-'1 MAY BE PROVIDED AT TIME OF PPL OR SDP. ■ 1 !! ; 1 PG.259 opEffry PERTY BOUNDARY :EASEMENT, J ____:_i ;-rn ppjAw' 1 8. MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ■ ;.7i . T BOUNDARY ZONING:A-AGRICULTURALIMELROSE ROW.;'''—1 ; REQUIREMENTS MAY BE MET WITH EXISTING CURRENT LAND USE NURSERY PRESERVE.WHERE THE PRESERVE DOES NOT 7:::-.:1:-.7-,:..-:::::-...=:.--------- --":-2.-..:1!!!-:::_'.'...:s',....•:-. i÷ -...7.:...=.J...=•;r:•-:•.-...-=.!,'.. MEET THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFERING 7,..................___........................__....,,,i.......nui. Nos*:...pumRm.....2PAuiva..__N..r.446.eyprest.._ REQuIREmENTs,RANTING To mEET THEsE CURRENT LAND USE RESIDENTIAL.VERONA . " REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE REQUIRED. .. -.• .. . WR3.3.74;74LbAte... WATERMEN AT ROMEDGE ROCKEDGE NAPLES,LIC RPUD 2 PER2h01.11112COLKR CO•1434T'S SK P./ WOVIS iNGIIIMUNG eriarit ea "'Arians '''''Mar I' " w.. 5 ;711 Tii ,. must KUNO COUNT CONWENIS SK FV .2/09/15 ...., MASTER PLAN *MO MN. VC •6. .,720730.0014" MI:01.0423W 20i5 .."1;2* Page 6 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPIJD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT C ROCKEDGE ZONING:PUD,COLLJER REGIONAL RPLID MASTER PLAN REIue SINLA MEDICAL CENTER URNT LAND USE: E FAMILY CURRENT LAND USE:PRESERVE RESIDENTIAL SUB-DIVISION —: �- 34'ROADWAY S y i • a 75'TYPE EASEMENT O.R 635 y i • a W l I 15' PEI R _ "e"BUFFER PG.1273 .+ i . a . . "D`BUFFER J ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE • a i- • a i I _ CURRENT LAND USE:SINGLE a . •" • i) l 1 FAMILY RESIDENTIAL • a • a 1 R p a a i . a . y . W V. i a s J ., . a . - p 4 . .I ZONING:MPUD. I 2' ,) I . a " a . a . . HACIENDA LAKES 15'TYPE a a . CURRENT LAND USE: • 36'WIDE I R "B•BUFFER . a . . i i y ail SINGLE FAMILY IEASEME ` —. a s a w a W . RESIDENTIAL I' OA 347 — — \` a .1` a a y. SUBDIVISION I PG.1632 ;`` — -"l S I a i+.'',S v —l/ .oa^. i w I ■ , 0.14.0006 J \ ` �••::,.•:∎;+1+:•- a II:: a W- i w PROPERTY R 2 \` _____ ' r. y�i 444:+:$i•'•4 . 4i•1*4. • I BOUNDARY '-1 --- R' .. 44r••r••r4•R•4.4•r••••4•A n•...44. a a i .J ►►" 564 I 1 .O'4yry0••0•'oo0i O••••a �••, `F 4 ••-,444444• 44-,444• •4 I*• ' ' I I TO BE�f I I I 44.0 4•yop� di�4•.�+i4i•��4�4 4 0 a, a a i ZONINO:A- IV's I I 4.4••"4 j•�••••4.4, a " ,.:::1 "' i I L. III} �1::%20:::::***.44ac� 4•i a i e' . CURRENT LAND I I { 4 y • •N••❖ W a a a I I Xt. 4�440.04• y .44.-: USE:SINGLE j''i LME I •i i i i0. - i . i ` k••44:.ya.y y y a `44.4.4` i a i ii FAMILY :11 : j ..P40 y . a . '4i•. :•-4.a RESIDENTIAL J a a a a a y L IL y-— -- �Y ♦ a i W D fl al I R — J i W a i . . . a a a i . . - a A-AGRICALTURE rY i .I t a y y +- a s CURRENTLAI�USE: '^ +i'4•�iy VACANT LAND wl I — _ — �W. ......:....v.-, a a W a i . v y�+--15'?YPE 15'TYPE •044.4.044 y4 •y•.•.•441• 1�1 LJ B"BUFFER "B"BUFFER I I %II:I:i:$$*1111* i a . i a y i a a i Fii�%• 1 Lore�0414�0.04.4�•�• _� •'.4i,, a d. S _� �- ___ - .7 I a-___za.4!•.4�•t•Si4 i y �.. i ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE ' I ,_ PROPERTY BOUNDARY l CURRENT LAND USE:SINGLE FAMILY / R RESIDENTIAL,VACANT LAND /// I OTENTIAL FUTURE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN l /// 1 I INTERCONNECTION i\ r (( L --+-2 II \ LME II ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE. PROPERTY BOUNDARY ' ! CURRENT LAND USE:NURSERY/SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL 1S"ME ,< R j "B"BUFFER I. LEGEND ■ 15'TYPE "* D"BUFFER : / [ R RESIDENTIAL I / R I 15'TYPE S RA RECREATIONAL 'B'BUFFER PROPERTY BOUNDARY AREA I. ® R I P PRESERVE l ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE TRAFFIC FLOW // /:- BUFFER CURRENT LAND USE: = PATTERN Ii R l/ NURSERY O DEVIATIONS I f 1 "B BUFFER. I Ail E I j 1 PROPERTY BOUNDARY I L,i WATER r I MANAGEMENT LAKE I I A 1 ZONING A-AGRICULTURE p+∎p•� ARCHAEOLOGICAL CURRENT LAND USE: !t!:4 AREA I I / II VACANT LAND Q IJ r- . PRESERVE I l 15.0.BU� BOUNDARY -, x _SM34,rnlxRPAP;_`._._ MARKER 'D"BUFFER W • r4rAlu WATERMEN AT ROCKEDGE ROCKEDGE ON s'w .R.N"":1'4'soow NAPLES.U-C RPUD {'''aig44) IAWeb4m 2 rum)POND[CUM Cd./MW SK 02 164W15 lNOMIlBINO N'!1q Ue4 me '"'Ol/OS'IS x"].324 I--WA 23 SR 20 I PIA 151 NGSVn COMP COWELOS cx M- 01/114/15 W-„" MASTER PLAN _... ♦RNA L.-..,7... ` I'"" SK .. 11I403b14L1'•-'0.PUDR1Il i11AS 1QS5 •'•2 d 2 >•w1ar fW-N- 5��,�>•YU-r+�M�'ww"__.2Yl_ Page 7 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT D Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 664.25 FEET ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF TRACT "F1" OF THE PLAT OF ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55, PAGE 1, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA; THENCE S01°14'38"W FOR 675.75 FEET ON SAID WEST LINE OF TRACT "Fl" TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT"Fl"; THENCE S01°14'14"W ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 675.73 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S89°42'08"W ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 662.30 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4466, PAGE 3476, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE EAST AND SOUTH LINES OF SAID PARCEL: 1. S01°09'56"W FOR 617.91 FEET; 2. N89°34'54"W FOR 300.19 FEET; 3. S01°09'09"W FOR 435.95 FEET; 4. N89°34'09"W FOR 150.16 FEET; 5. N89°38'05"W FOR 210.56 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (E-1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°05'19"E ON SAID WEST LINE FOR 43.72 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF (S-1/2) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°48'02"W ON SAID NORTH LINE FOR 15.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4970,PAGE 3362, SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FOUR BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE SOUTH, WEST AND NORTH LINES OF SAID PARCEL 1: 1. S01°05'19"W ON SAID EAST LINE FOR 303.80 FEET; 2. N89°37'28"W FOR 645.47 FEET; 3. N01°01'07"E FOR 302.01 FEET Page 8 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT D Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 4. S89°47'35"E FOR 30.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND RECORDED IN IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4466, PAGE 3476, SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL: 1. N01°01'01"E FOR 218.98 FEET; 2. N52°35'40"E FOR 64623 FEET; 3. N40°29'08"W FOR 30.05 FEET; 4. N49°40'54"E FOR 22.10 FEET; 5. THENCE N36°22'15"E FOR 436.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°42'08"W ON SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 785.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°01'01"E FOR 332.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°32'04"W FOR 994.18 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°42'08"E FOR 331.15 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°56'29"W FOR 660.13 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°57'42"W FOR 330.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; Page 9 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT D Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development THENCE N89°47'35"W ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 230.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 100 FEET EAST OF (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR)AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE NO0°51153"E ON SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1642.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/2) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°22'01"E FOR 894.88 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE NO0°58'45"E FOR 662.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST(NE-1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 996.40 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF (E-1/2) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S01°05'30"W ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 328.19 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 328.19 FEET SOUTH OF (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR)AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N89°01'53"E ON SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 663.85 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (E-1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°10'38"E ON SAID EAST LINE FOR 328.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS THAT PART OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 321, PAGE 259, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL CONTAINS 106.44 ACRES,MORE OR LESS. BEARINGS HEREINABOVE MENTIONED ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST TO BEAR NORTH 89°01'58" EAST. Page 10 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT E Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development LIST OF DEVIATIONS Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC, Section 6.06.01.N which requires minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet, to allow a 50' right-of-way width for the private internal streets that include public utilities. Deviation#2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C,which permits a maximum wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts,to allow a maximum wall height of 8' along the perimeter of the project,and allow a 12'tall wall/berm combination where abutting an existing public roadway. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height,to allow a temporary banner sign up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area. The temporary banner sign shall be limited to maximum of 90 days per calendar year during season defined as November 1 to April 30. This deviation will remain in force until the project is sold out. Deviation#4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5,which requires on-premises directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10' from edge of roadway, to allow a setback of 5' from the edge of a private roadway/drive aisle. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.14, which allows one (1) boundary marker sign or monument structure at each property corner with a sign face no more than 24 square feet, to allow the option of one (1) monument sign along C.R. 951 with a sign face of 64 square feet,rather the two(2)boundary markers that would be allowed per code. Deviation # 6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.04.D.1, which prohibits doors and windows on the zero lot line portion of a dwelling unit,to allow windows. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J which requires cul-de-sac lengths not to exceed 1,000 feet, to allow 2,500 feet for the one cul-de-sac street identified on the RPUD Master Plan Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.3.e which limits temporary use permits for model homes to 3 years, to allow a temporary use permit of 5 years without the need to request approval of a Conditional Use petition. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07.H.3.a., which requires a minimum 25' preserve setback for all principal structures to allow a 12.5' side yard setback from wetland preserves for principal structures where identified on the RPUD Master Plan. The reduced setback is allowed in combination with a structural buffer as allowed by the SFWMD. Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4, which requires a 20' Type D buffer along perimeter boundaries abutting a right-of-way for all developments of 15 acres or more,to a allow a 15' Type D buffer adjacent to right-of-ways where identified on the RPUD Master Plan Page 11 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT F Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS PUD MONITORING: One entity (hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close-out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval,the Managing Entity is Watermen at Rockedge Naples, LLC or its assigns. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity, then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts,the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUT)commitments. Commencing with submittal of the first development order that utilizes TDR credits, a TDR calculation sheet shall be submitted documenting that the owner has acquired all TDR credits needed for that portion of the development. The calculation sheet tracks the chronological assignment of TDR credits with respect to all subsequent development orders until the maximum density allowed by the utilization of TDR credits has been reached (all TDR credits allowing residential development reach a zero balance). TRANSPORTATION: A. At the request of Collier County, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) bus stop with shelter will be installed by the developer at no cost to the County. The exact location will be determined during site development plan review; however, every effort shall be made for co-utilization of the CAT stop for a school bus pick-up and drop-off. This shall be coordinated with the Collier County School District. If co-utilization is determined not to be feasible, then a site for school bus drop-off and pick-up shall be provided internal to the site. B. The owner, and its successors or assigns will be responsible a proportionate share of signalization and intersection improvements at Sabal Palm Road and Collier Boulevard (CR 951),when warranted. C. The Rockedge PUD Transportation Impact Study was based on a development scenario of 266 single-family detached units. The total trip generation was estimated in the TIS to be 253 PM peak hour two-way external trips based on ITE trip generation rates. The development scenario of 266 single-family detached units may change. However, the Project's estimated trip generation will not exceed a maximum of 253 PM peak hour two-way external trips. Page 12 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPuD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT F Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development ENVIRONMENTAL: A. Project has 81.81 acres of native vegetation. 3.36 acres of non-native area have been included in the native vegetation preserve requirements due to a past clearing violation by previous owners. Native vegetation requirement is based on the 81.81 acres plus the 3.36 acres or 85.17 acres total. 25%of 85.17 results in a preserve requirement of 21.29 acres. The project is preserving 24.2 acres which is more than required. ARCHAEOLOGICAL: In 2014, a Phase I cultural resource assessment of the site was conducted by Robert S. Can, M.S., of the Archeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. This assessment(A Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment of the Rockedge Parcel, AHC Technical Report #1024) is a revised and expanded phase of work that follows a 2003 assessment of a portion of the Rockedge parcel. Seven previously recorded sites (CR726, CR873, CR874, CR875, CR896, CR897, CR898) and two previously unrecorded sites (CR1371, CR1372) were documented. Based on the discovery of CR1371, a small black earth midden, a Phase II assessment was completed and the report (A Phase II Cultural Resource Assessment of Rockedge #2, Site 8CR1371, AHC Technical Report #1044). Letters concurring with the findings, results, and recommendations (including Phase III mitigation)of the two reports were received on 12/31/15 and 3/04/15 respectively. In accordance with the Phase 1 assessment: A. Prior to any clearing or grubbing activities within 100 feet of the archaeological preserves labeled "to be preserved" or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map,a temporary construction fence shall be placed around the preserve areas. B. Any clearing of exotic vegetation within the archaeological preserve labeled "to be preserved" or"designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map s shall be conducted by hand. No mechanical equipment shall be used within the archaeological preserves for clearing or debris removal. C. All activities of clearing, grubbing, and subsurface alterations such as digging for utilities ditches, water management lakes, roads and the like that are located within 90 feet of the archaeological preserves labeled"to be preserved" or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map and archaeological sites labeled "not eligible to be preserved" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map shall be subject to archaeological monitoring. D. The site plan shows archaeological areas within the preserves labeled "to be preserved" or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map. No storage of fill, equipment or supplies shall be placed in the archaeological areas within the native vegetation preserve. Page 13 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT F Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development E. Should any replanting or landscaping be permitted or required within the archaeological preserves labeled "to be preserved" or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map, such activity shall be coordinated with and monitored by an archaeologist. F. If any archaeological features or artifacts are discovered during construction or development activities in the Rockedge RPUD, all development and construction activities shall cease at that location until the site has been examined by an archaeologist and necessary efforts to protect and/or document such resources have been implemented. G. If additional human remains are discovered within the Rockedge RPUD, then the provisions of Florida Statutes Section 872.05—laws governing the treatment of unmarked human burials—shall apply. ■ Page 14 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 • . 2224 `, _ ORDINANCE NO.06-31 , ' J t'o 'N ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, RECEIV-tu ENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 04-41, AS AMENDED, .$ / THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, tip` WHICH INCLUDES THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING 14168LOS1 • REGULATIONS FOR THE UNINCORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING THE •- APPROPRIATE ZONING ATLAS MAP OR MAPS BY CHANGING THE ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE SUBJECT REAL PROPERTY FROM "A" RURAL AGRICULURAL TO"RPUD"RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT • DEVELOPMENT KNOWN AS ROCKEDGE RPUD LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF COLLIER BOULEVARD (CR 951), • APPROXIMATELY 6 TENTHS OF A MILE SOUTH OF ITS INTERSECTION WITH RATTLESNAKE-HAMMOCK ROAD, IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, CONSISTING OF 76.421 - ACRES,AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, Robert Mulhere, of RWA, Inc., representing Woodfield Builders, LLC, petitioned the Board of County Commissioners to change the zoning classification of the subject real property known as petition PUDZ-2003-AR-4991. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA that: SECTION ONE The zoning classification of the subject real property located in Section 23,Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida,more particularly described in Section 1.2 of the RPUD Document, is changed from"A" Rural Agricultural to "RPUD" Residential Planned Unit Development in accordance with the Rockedge RPUD Document,attached hereto as Exhibit"A" and incorporated by reference herein. The Official Zoning Atlas Map,as described in Ordinance Number 2004-41,as amended,the Collier County Land Development Code,is/are hereby amended accordingly, SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall become effective upon filing with the Department of State. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED by super majority vote of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County,Florida,this to day of U r%e_ ,2006. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT E.BItOCIC,:CLERK COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA 1'�'A: •, ': '' ►OC BY:• V Attest as l t471i11'S FRANK HALAS,CHAII2MAN` $l�Mture only. Approved'a;;to.form and' legal sufficiency. ' ,,,,,6, tng This ordinance filed with the — .�µ� tary of Mate's Office the Marjo M.Student-Stirling �� 0 1 day of sWVC Assistant County Attorney and ocknowiedgeme�+��J that PIroz-2003-AR499�/Mttn fili rec ed this day of , BY Iry Attachment B ROCKEDGE RPUD A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS AND SUPPORTING MASTER PLAN GOVERNING ROCKEDGE RPUD, A RESIDENTIAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF THE COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE PREPARED FOR: WOODFIELD BUILDERS,LLC 6604 RIDGEWOOD AVENUE NAPLES,FLORIDA 34108 PREPARED BY: ROBERT J. MULHERE,AICP CONSULTING �. s... V V 1 -E- 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples Florida, 34109 R. BRUCE ANDERSON ROETZEL&ANDRESS LAW FIRM 850 PARK SHORE DRIVE TRIANON CENTRE-THIRD FLOOR NAPLES,FL 34103 DATE REVIEWED BY CCPC DATE APPROVED BY BCC 6/06/2006 ORDINANCE NUMBER 2006-31 AMENDMENTS AND REPEAL 2004-41 EXHIBIT A TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Exhibits and Tables Statement of Compliance Section I General Description,Property Ownership and Legal Description I-1 Section II Project Development Requirements II-1 Section III Development Standards III-1 Section IV Preserve Area IV-1 Section V Development Commitments V-1 LIST OF EXHIBITS,TABLES, AND APPENDIX EXHIBIT"A" RPUD MASTER PLAN EXHIBIT"B" VICINITY MAP EXHIBIT"C" BOUNDARY SURVEY TABLE "I" DENSITY CALCULATIONS TABLE"H" DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE The development of approximately 76.46 acres of property in Collier County, Florida as a Residential Planned Unit Development, to be known as the Rockedge RPUD, with an affordable housing component consisting of at least 30 percent of the units required to be sold to buyers earning 80% or less of Collier County's median income, as calculated annually by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), will be in compliance with the goals, objectives and policies of Collier County as set forth in the adopted Growth Management Plan (GMP). The required 30% is based upon 55.97 acres of the project which qualifies for the affordable housing density bonus as set forth in the GMP.Based upon the allowable base density on the 55.97 portion of the project, and the 285 bonus units requested, 111 affordable housing units are required. The proposed residential development, and accessory uses and facilities are consistent with the growth policies, land development regulations, and applicable comprehensive planning objectives of each of the elements of the GMP for the following reasons: 1. The subject property is located within the Urban Mixed Use District/Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict as identified on the Future Land Use Map as provided for in Objective 1, Policy 5.1 and 5.3 of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE), and the proposed residential development is consistent therewith; 2. The project is proposed to be a residential development located within the Urban-Mixed Use District/Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict, as identified on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM), of the FLUE. The FLUE provides for a density bonus within the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict in the case of specifically identified properties of up to 6.0 additional units per gross acre for projects providing home ownership for residents earning 80% or less of Collier County's median income,pursuant to the provisions of the Collier County LDC 2.06.00,excluding subsection 2.06.03. Table 1. below sets forth the allowable and requested density for the project. The subject project is eligible to receive a density bonus of up to six (6) dwelling units per gross acre on the 55.97 acres of the project that qualifies for this density bonus. The requested bonus on the 55.97 acres is 5.09 DUs per acre, which yields a total density for the entire Rockedge RPUD of 400 dwelling units or 5.23 units per gross acre, as set forth in Appendix `B"of this PUD, the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement. This is less than the maximum 5.90 DUs per acre that can be requested under the FLUE provisions. The requested project density is therefore consistent with the FLUE,Policy 5.1 of the Collier County GMP. ii (4tipcitplun Ba0e Degsjty Crus4 Base Requested'. [i ws�yferl r #•UE. l tioi Acres (t)weWbt tts(DUs 1Q£ns,t Density per: q utr` r AllawAle par A►cre.. 1' AtivirwWet Acre bed..:r: Urban Residential 76.46 acres 1.5 DUs/Acre 115 DUs 1.5 DUs/Acre 115 DUs Fringe(URF) URF Affordable Housing Density 55.97 acres 6.0 DUs/Acre 336 DUs 5.09 DUs/Acre 285 DUs Bonus Totals(for entire 76.47 acres) 5.90 DUs/Acre 451 DUs _ 5.23 DUs/Acre 400 DUs Table 1:Density Calculations *Rounded up per LDC definition of Density.Residential. 3. The project will implement Objective 1 of the Housing Element by providing additional "affordable housing" dwelling units in Collier County, within the proposed master planned development. Moreover,these units will be provided for fee simple purchase. 4. The project will further the implementation of Policy 1.4 of the Housing Element by providing "affordable housing" an area where planned infrastructure and services will be available. 5. The project will act to implement Policy 2.9 of the Housing Element by providing "affordable housing" dwelling units blended within the balance of the RPUD, a planned market rate development. 6. The development will be compatible with and complementary to existing and planned surrounding land uses, and will enhance the transportation network by providing for future interconnection to properties to the north and to the south, as depicted on the RPUD Master Plan. 7. The development of the Rockedge RPUD will result in an efficient and economical extension of community facilities and services as required in Policies 3.1.G of the FLUE. 8. The Rockedge RPUD is consistent with and furthers Policy 5.5 of the Future FLUE in that it is using existing land designated for urban uses. 9. The Rockedge RPUD implements Policy 5.6 of the FLUE in that a minimum of 60% of the project will be open space and a minimum of 25% of the project's existing native vegetation will be preserved on-site. 10. The Master Development Plan, with its natural preserve areas, lakes,recreation, and other open space areas, will insure that the developed project will be an attractive and enjoyable residential development. iii SECTION I PROPERTY OWNERSHIP AND DESCRIPTION 1.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the location and ownership of the property, and to describe the existing conditions of the property proposed to be developed under the project name of the Rockedge RPUD. 1.2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OR TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF COLLIER LYING IN SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,BEING MORE PARTICULARLY BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A 4 INCH CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE CENTER SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE, ALONG THE EAST-WEST MID-SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 23, N.89°00'52"E.,A DISTANCE OF 664.38 FEET; THENCE,DEPARTING FROM SAID MID-SECTION LINE, S.01°13'49"W.,A DISTANCE OF 1,350.38 FEET; THENCE S.89°40'52"W.,A DISTANCE OF 662.16 FEET; THENCE S.89°41'40"W., A DISTANCE OF 1,325.03 FEET; THENCE N.01°00'34"E.,A DISTANCE OF 331.32 FEET; THENCE S.89°34'42"W.,A DISTANCE OF 993.80 FEET; THENCE S.00°54'44"W.,A DISTANCE OF 329.05 FEET; THENCE N.89°41'35"E.,A DISTANCE OF 331.01 FEET; THENCE S.00°58'01"W., A DISTANCE OF 330.10 FEET; THENCE S.89°52'20"W.,A DISTANCE OF 561.91 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF A 100.00 FEET WIDE CANAL THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO AND I00 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE, ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,N,00°50'28"E.,A DISTANCE OF 984.20 FEET; THENCE,DEPARTING FROM SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,N.89°23'49"E.,A DISTANCE OF 894.94 FEET; THENCE N.00°59'07"E.,A DISTANCE OF 662.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SAID EAST- WEST MID-SECTION LINE; THENCE,ALONG SAID EAST-WEST MID-SECTION LINE,N.89°00'55"E., A DISTANCE OF 996.67 FEET; THENCE, DEPARTING FROM SAID EAST-WEST MID-SECTION LINE,S.00°57'32"W.,A DISTANCE OF 327.91 FEET; THENCE N.88°5825"E.,A DISTANCE OF 663.65 FEET; THENCE N.01°05'18"E.,A DISTANCE OF 327.46 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 3,330,396 SQUARE FEET OR 76.46 ACRES,MORE OR LESS. I-1 1.3 PROPERTY OWNERSHIP The property ownership is as follows: All parcels owned by: Woodfield Builders,LLC 6604 Ridgewood Avenue Naples,Florida 34108 1.4 DEVELOPER The Rockedge RPUD is intended to be developed by Woodfield Builders, LLC, references to the "Developer" as may be contained in this RPUD Document shall mean Woodfield Builders, LLC, unless, and until the subject property described and depicted in this RPUD Document is conveyed, or assigned. 1.5 PHYSICAL AND LOCATIONAL DESCRIPTION The subject property consists of+/- 76.46 acres and is located on the east side of Collier Blvd. (CR 951), approximately 6 tenths of a mile south of intersection with Rattlesnake Hammock Road (south of John's Road), in Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida_ The property is designated Urban, Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe Sub-district, as is the surrounding land on the east side of Collier Boulevard. The existing lands uses on the site include: unimproved roads and both disturbed and forested land. The Master Plan sets forth +/- 25.32 acres of preserve areas, including 21.86 acres of wetland preserve and 3.46 acres of archeological preserve areas. The RPUD property contains 65.54 +/- acres of native vegetation. The LDC requires preservation of 25% of the existing on site native vegetation, or a minimum of 16.39 acres. The PUD Master Plan indicates that 21.86 acres or 33%of the site is labeled as Preserve and shall be placed into a conservation easement. The property is not located within a Flood Zone(Zone X,Community Number 120067, Panel Number 610D). The water management system consists of approximately 10.0 acres of water management lakes and lake maintenance easements that will receive runoff from structures and parking areas. Runoff is collected by catch basins and culvert systems for conveyance to the project's internal lake system_ The project outfall will be split to the east and west parameters of the subject property. Discharge will either be entirely or partially into the Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951) Canal right-of-way, and to the extent permitted by the South Florida Water Management District to the west side of the subject property, or, discharge and re-hydration into the wetland preserve on the east side of the subject property. Allowable discharge rates will be in accordance with Collier County Code of Laws, Section 90-21 (Ordinance No. 90-10), as amended. I-2 1.6 PROJECT DESCRIPTION The Rockedge RPUD is a residential planned development,which will be developed with up to 400 multi-family units. The maximum allowable gross density is 5.23 dwelling units per acre. A minimum of 30 percent (111 units) of the density generated from the 55.97 acre parcel which qualifies for the affordable housing bonus are required to be sold to buyers earning 80% or less of Collier County's median income, as calculated annually by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). This is an Affordable Housing Project and the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement is made a part of this PUD Document and identified as Appendix "B". The amenities proposed to be provided in the project include structures and areas to provide social and recreational space, lakes, natural and landscaped open spaces, and a variety of passive and active recreational opportunities. The required children's playground/tot lot area will be provided prior to,but not later than,when certificates of occupancy are issued for 35%of the allowable units for this project. Access to the property will be from Collier Boulevard (C.R. 951). In the vicinity of the project, both Collier Boulevard and Rattlesnake Hammock Road's scheduled to be widened to six lanes. These improvements are funded in the current Transportation Five-Year Work Program. Rattlesnake Hammock widening has already commenced and Collier Boulevard is scheduled to commence in 2006. Each residential unit will be served with centrally provided potable water, sanitary sewer, electric power, and telephone. Additional services will be provided as deemed appropriate. 1.7 SHORT TITLE This Ordinance shall be known and cited as the "Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development(RPUD)Ordinance". I-3 SECTION II PROJECT DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS 2.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to delineate and generally describe the project plan of development, relationships to applicable County Ordinances, the respective land uses of the Rockedge RPUD development, as well as other project relationships. The RPUD is intended to be developed with a maximum of 400 multi-family dwelling units, of which, a minimum of 30 percent(111 units)of the density generated from the 55.97 acre parcel which qualifies for the affordable housing bonus are required to be sold to HUD. The project will also include accessory recreational facilities, preserve areas, water management lakes,and other similar ancillary uses. 2.2 GENERAL A. Regulations for development of the Rockedge RPUD shall be in accordance with: the contents of this document; the RPUD-Planned Unit Development District of the LDC, Section 2.03.06; and, other applicable sections and parts of the LDC in effect at the time of building permit application. Where these RPUD regulations fail to provide specific developmental standards, then the provisions of the most similar district in the LDC shall apply. B. Unless otherwise noted, the definitions of all terms shall be the same as the definitions set forth in the LDC in effect at the time of building permit application. C. All conditions imposed and all graphic material presented depicting restrictions for the development of the Rockedge RPUD shall become part of the regulations that govern the manner in which the RPUD site may be developed. D. Unless modified, waived or excepted by this RPUD, the provisions of other sections of the LDC, where applicable, remain in full force and effect with respect to the development of the land that comprises this RPUD. E. Development permitted by the approval of this petition will be subject to a concurrency review under the provisions of Section 10.02.07, Adequate Public Facilities, of the LDC, at the earliest or next to occur of either final site development plan approval, or final plat approval. II-t 2.3 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT PLAN AND LAND USE TRACTS A. The project Master Plan, including layout internal access drives, conceptual water management plan, and residential land use and preserve tracts, is illustrated graphically by Exhibit"A", RPUD Master Plan. B. Areas depicted as lakes on Exhibit "A", shall be constructed as lakes or, upon approval, parts thereof may be constructed as shallow, intermittent wet and dry depressions for water retention, and/or littoral zones for habitat recreation purposes. Such areas shall be in the same general configuration and contain the same general acreage as shown by Exhibit "A", except where redesign or revisions are permitted as outlined in paragraph C. below. C. Internal drives, water management lakes, internal tract boundaries, and parking areas may be modified, relocated and/or revised as necessary to accommodate state or federal permitting conditions, site design changes and market conditions, provided that such internal design changes do not impact or reduce preserve tracts. The project access point at Collier Boulevard may not be revised except by approval of Collier County Transportation Staff, or as a result of a PUD Master Plan change. D. In addition to the various areas and specific items shown on Exhibit "A", such easements as may be necessary(utility, private, semi-private) shall be established within or along the various tracts. 2.4 MAXIMUM PROJECT DENSITY A maximum of 400 residential dwelling units shall be developed within this project. A minimum of 30 percent (111 units) of the density generated from the 55.97 acre parcel which qualifies for the affordable housing bonus are required to be sold to buyers earning 80%or less of Collier County's median income,as calculated annually by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The gross project area is approximately 76.46 acres. The gross project density shall not exceed 400 total units or 5.23 dwelling units per gross acre. 2.5 PROJECT PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS A. Prior to the issuance of any final local development order for all or part of the RPUD, final plans of all required improvements shall receive approval of the appropriate Collier County governmental agency to insure compliance with the RPUD Master Plan and the LDC. B. Any division of property and the development of the land shall comply with Chapter 10.02.04 of the LDC and the platting laws of the State of Florida. II-2 C. The provisions of Chapter 10.02.03 of the LDC, when applicable, shall apply to the development of all platted tracts, or parcels of land as provided in said Division prior to the issuance of a building permit or other development order. D. Appropriate instruments will be provided at the time of infrastructural improvements regarding any dedications and methods for providing perpetual maintenance of common facilities. 2.6 LAKE SETBACK AND EXCAVATIONS Lake setbacks shall conform to the requirements described in Section 22-112(b), of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Lakes may be excavated to the maximum commercial excavation depths set forth in Section 22-112(c) of the Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances. Offsite removal of fill during construction of Rockedge RPUD shall be limited to ten percent(10%)of the total volume excavated,to a maximum 20,000 cubic yards,unless a commercial excavation permit is received. 2.7 RIGHTS-OF-WAY The project will utilize internal driveways to access the site,multi-family dwelling units, and recreational facilities. Utilization of lands within all project rights-of-way and/or internal driveways for landscaping,decorative entranceways, and signage may be allowed subject to review and administrative approval by the Collier County Community Development and Environmental Services Administrator,or his designee, for engineering and safety considerations prior to installation. 2.8 AMENDMENTS TO RPUD DOCUMENT OR RPUD MASTER PLAN Changes and amendments to this RPUD Ordinance or RPUD Master Development Plan, Exhibit "A", are permissible as provided for in Chapter 10.02.13(E) of the LDC. Minor changes and refinements as described in Section 5.3.0 of this RPUD Document may be made in connection with any type of development or permit application required by the LDC. 2.9 DEDICATION AND MAINTENANCE OF COMMON AREAS & FACILITIES Easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be provided for water management areas, rights-of-way, utilities and other purposes as required. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all service utilities in compliance with applicable regulations in effect at the time of adoption of this Ordinance establishing the Rockedge RPUD. II-3 Whenever the Developer elects to create land area and/or recreation amenities, the ownership and maintenance responsibility of which is a common interest to all subsequent purchasers of residential units or real property within the Rockedge RPUD, the developer shall provide appropriate legal instruments for the establishment of one or more property owners' associations, or a master association. In such case, the property owners' Association or Master Association shall include provisions for the perpetual care and maintenance of all common facilities and open space, for which the respective association has such obligation, subject further to the provisions of the LDC. 2.10 MODEL,SALES,AND CONSTRUCTION OPERATION FACILITIES A. Models, sales centers, administrative offices and other uses and structures related to the promotion, sale and/or rental, and management associated with the development shall be permitted as a principal use throughout the Rockedge RPUD subject to the requirements of Chapter 4.05.00;4.06.00; 5.06.00;and 5.04.04 of th LDC. Permitted accessory uses to the promotion, sale and/or rental, and management of the development includes: pavilions, viewing platforms, gazebos, parking areas,and signs. B. Temporary use permits for sales centers, and model homes may be approved subsequent to zoning approval. Temporary use permit applications, and associated site development plan(SDP) application(s) for residential models, may be submitted concurrently with applications for subdivision plat, to depict the location of the model units within a future platted lot. All model units shall be located on lots that will be platted through subsequent development order approvals. C. Temporary uses for sales centers may be serviced by temporary well and septic systems. D. A portion of the clubhouse facilities may be used as a permanent sales facility to be utilized to market residential products, including re-sale of residences within the boundaries of this Rockedge RPUD, as well as for on-going project administration. 2.11 CLUBHOUSE Site Development Plan (SDP) application(s) for the clubhouse and related recreational facilities may be submitted concurrently with applications for subdivision plat to depict the location of the clubhouse and related facilities within the proposed future platted tract, and may be approved simultaneously with the plat approval. I1-4 2.12 FILL STORAGE Fill storage is generally permitted as a principal use throughout the Rockedge RPUD. Fill material generated may be stockpiled within areas designated for residential development for a period not to exceed 18 months in any single location. Prior to stockpiling in these locations, a Vegetation Removal and Site Filling Permit, along with plans showing the locations and cross-sections shall be submitted to Collier County Planning Services Staff for review and approval.The following standards shall apply: A. Stockpile maximum side slope: 3:1. B. Stockpile maximum height: thirty-five(35)feet. C. Fill storage areas shall be screened with a security fence at least six (6) feet in height above ground Ievel. If fill is spread to a height less than five (5) feet over residential development areas that are depicted on an approved Site development Plan(SDP),or approved subdivision construction plans,no fencing is required. D. Soil erosion control shall be provided in accordance with Subsection I0.02.02.0 of the LDC, and stockpiling retained for periods greater than 90 days shall be seeded with grass. If fill is spread to a height less than five (5) feet over residential development areas that are depicted on an approved site development plan (SDP), or approved subdivision construction plans, erosion control is required,but no seeding with grass is required. E. Fill storage shall not be permitted in preserve areas or surrounding buffers. 2.13 REQUIRED ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING Where the development of land within the Rockedge RPUD requires a permit from a local, State, or Federal agency with jurisdiction over the property proposed for development, the Developer shall obtain such permits prior to final plat or site development plan(SDP)approval, as applicable. 2.14 NATIVE VEGETATION RETENTION REQUIREMENTS Pursuant to Policy 6.4.6 of the Conservation and Coastal Management Element of the Collier County GMP, and Section 3.05.04 of the LDC; a minimum of 16.39 acres (25% of the 65.54 acres of viable, naturally functioning native vegetation on site) is required to be retained or replanted. The RPUD Master Plan reflects the preservation of 21.86 acres of native vegetation, and an additional 3.46 acres of land is to be preserved to protect archeological resources, but is not counted towards the required 25% native vegetation preservation requirement. 1I-5 SECTION III RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS 3.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to identify specific development standards for areas designated as Tract"R1"and"R2"on the RPUD Master Plan,Exhibit"A". 3.2 MAXIMUM DWELLING UNITS The maximum number of residential dwelling units allowed within the RPUD shall be 400 dwelling units. 3.3 USES PERMITTED No building, structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. TRACT R: 1) PRINCIPAL USES: a. Multi-family dwellings. b. Model Homes and Model Home Centers (See Section 2.10 of this RPUD Document). c. Project sales and administrative offices,which may occur in residential or recreational buildings, and/or in temporary buildings until similar use determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals, to be comparable with, and compatible to, the above listed Principal Uses, subject to the provisions and procedures set forth in Section 10.08.00 of the LDC. 2) ACCESSORY USES: a. Customary accessory uses and structures including, but not limited to, clubhouses, playgrounds, private garages, tennis facilities, and swimming pools with, or without screened enclosures, and other outdoor recreation facilities. b. Utility facilities and or easements(including rights-of-way easements). c. Signage(see Section 5.11 of this document). d. Water management facilities/lakes. e. Storage areas, for the exclusive use of the residents of the RPUD. lli-1 f. Any other similar use determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals, to be comparable with, and compatible to, the above listed • Accessory Uses, subject to the provisions and procedures set forth in Section 10.08.00 of the LDC. • 3.4 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS A. GENERAL: Except as provided for herein, all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. (All required yards shall be measured from the perimeter boundaries of the PUD.) B. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS: TABLE 11:RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS MULTI-FAMILY CLUBHOUSE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES:2'3 MIN.LOT AREA 10,000 N/A AVERAGE LOT WIDTH 150 FEET N/A MIN.FLOOR AREA 600 S.F. N/A FRONT YARD 20 FEET N/A SIDE YARD 15 FEET N/A REAR YARD 15 FEET N/A MIN.DIST. BETWEEN STRUCTURES 20 FEET N/A FROM PRESERVE TRACTS1 25 FEET 25 FEET MAX.BLDG.HT. 3 FLOORS N/A OVER PARKING NTE 45 FEET ACCESSORY STRUCTURES (INCLUDING GARAGES)3.a FRONT SPS 15 FEET SIDE SPS 7.5 FEET REAR 10 FEET N/A FROM PRESERVE TRACTS (ALL STRUCTURES AND SITE ALTERATIONS)' 10 FEET 10 FEET MAX.BLDG.HT. S.P.S. 35 FEET MIN.DIST. BETWEEN STRUCTURES 15 FEET SPS III-2 • NOTES: S.P.S.:Same as Principal Structures. BR:Building Height.Building shall be measured as set forth in the LDC NTE:Not to Exceed 'The location of structures proposed adjacent to a"wetland"preserves shall be subject to the provisions of the LDC in effect at the time of development. Site alterations are prohibited within 10 feet of the preserve boundary unless it can be demonstrated that such alterations, included placement of fill or structural barriers within 10 feet of preserve boundary will not negatively impact the preserve". 2Structures shall not encroach into landscape buffers,except as may be permitted in LDC(such as for water management structures, signs,and the like). 1 All Setbacks(Front,Side and Rear)are measured from parcel boundaries. '.. s Front loading garages shall have a minimum front yard setback of 23 feet,as measured from the back of sidewalk. Side loaded garages may be located less than 23 feet from the back of sidewalk provided that the driveway design allows for parking of vehicles so as not to interfere with or block the sidewalk. 111-3 SECTION IV PRESERVE AREA 4.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development plan for areas designated as Tract "P", Preserve Area on Exhibit "A", RPUD Master Plan. Preserve areas include those tracts identified as Archeological Preserve "AP" and Preserve "P". This PUD contains 21.86 acres of lands designated "P" Preserve, and 3.46 acres of land designated "AP" Archeological Preserve. The primary function and purpose of this Tract is to preserve and protect identified archeological sites, native vegetation, and naturally functioning habitats, such as wetlands, including upland buffers, in their natural, and/or enhanced state. 4.2 USES PERMITTED No building or structure or part thereof, shall be erected altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following, subject to the issuance of local, regional, State and Federal permits,when required: Principal Uses: 1) Open spaces/nature preserves. 2) Water management structures. 3) Mitigation areas. 4) Hiking trails, boardwalks, shelters, or other such facilities constructed for the purposes of passage through or enjoyment of the site's natural attributes, subject to approval by permitting agencies, provided any such passive uses does not impact the minimum required native vegetation. Iv-I SECTION V DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 5.1 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the development commitments for the development of the project. 5.2 GENERAL All facilities shall be constructed in strict accordance with approved site development plans, subdivision plans (if required), and all applicable State and local laws, codes, and regulations applicable to this RPUD. Except where specifically noted or stated otherwise, the standards and specifications of Section III of the proposed Construction Standards Manual shall apply to this project, even if the land within the RPUD is not to be platted. The developer, its successors and assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this Document. The developer, its successors or assignee, shall follow the Master Development Plan and the regulations of the RPUD, as adopted, and any other conditions or modifications as may be agreed to in the rezoning of the property. In addition, any successors or assignee in title to the developer is bound by any commitments within this agreement. These commitments may be assigned or delegated to a condominium/homeowners' association to be created by the developer. Upon assignment or delegation, the developer shall be released from responsibility for the commitments, except to the extent the developer or its agents remain in control of such association. The developer, his successor and assigns, shall be responsible for the commitments outlined in this Document. These commitments will be enforced throughout provisions agreed to be included in the declaration of covenants and restrictions, or similar recorded instrument. Such provisions must be enforceable by lot owners against the developer, its successors, and assigns, until the turnover of the property to any property or homeowner's association. 5.3 RPUD MASTER DEVELOPMENT PLAN A. Exhibit "A", RPUD Master PIan illustrates the proposed development and is conceptual in nature. Proposed tract, parcel, or land use boundaries, or special land use boundaries shall not be construed to be final, and may be varied at any time at any subsequent approval phase such as final platting or site development plan applications. Subject to the provisions of Chapter 10.02.13.E of the LDC, as amended, and amendments which maybe made from time to time. B. All necessary easements, dedications, or other instruments shall be granted to insure the continued operation and maintenance of all services and all common areas in the project. v-t 5.4 ARCHEOLOGICAL SITE PRESERVATION In July of 2003, a Phase One Archaeological Assessment of the site was performed, by John G. Beriault, B.A., under the direction of Robert S. Carr, M.S., of the Archeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. Three previously unrecorded sites (CR873, CR874, CR875) were discovered and one, (8CR726) was previously recorded and is predominantly located within the Collier Boulevard ROW (CR951) right-of-way. Relative to 8CR726, the Phase One Archaeological Assessment report states: "Extensive judgmental testing ...indicates that this area has been so severely impacted by prior mechanical clearing and scraping that only minimal in situ archeological material remain. The Phase One Archaeological Assessment describes CR873 as "a patchy scatter of faunal bone..." The report describes CR874 and CR875, respectively the Rockledge Midden and the Hamelia Midden sites, as "intensive ...containing ... a variety of artifacts, marine shell, and faunal bone." One human bone was recovered from CR875, the Hamelia Midden, "...suggesting the possibility that a prehistoric grave or cemetery could occur in association with ... the midden sites." While it is not feasible to preserve CR873, as it falls within a necessary development area, the PUD master plan has been designed to preserve in perpetuity the two intensive and significant sites,Rockledge Midden(CR874)and Hamelia Midden(CR875). Further, the following additional recommendations contained in the Phase One Archaeological Assessment shall be applied as conditions of this RPUD: A. Prior to any clearing or grubbing activities within 200 feet of the archeological preserves, a temporary construction fence shall be placed around the preserve areas. B. Any clearing of exotic vegetation within the archeological preserves shall be conducted by hand. No mechanical equipment shall be used within the archeological preserves for clearing or debris removal. C. All activities of clearing, grubbing, and subsurface alterations such as digging for utilities ditches, water management lakes, roads and the like, within 100 feet of the archeological preserves shall be subject to archeological monitoring. D. No storage of fill,equipment or supplies shall be placed with the native vegetation preserve areas(which include the archeological preserves). E. Should any replanting or landscaping be permitted or required within the archeological preserves, such activity shall be coordinated with and monitored by an archeologist. F. If any archeological features or artifacts are discovered during construction or V-2 development activities on the site outside of the designated archeological preserves, all development and construction activities shall cease until the site has been examined by an archeologist and necessary efforts to protect such resources have been employed. G. If additional human remains are discovered then the guidelines for Florida Statute Section 872.05,the Unmarked Grave Act, shall apply. 5.5 SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT/MONITORING REPORT AND SUNSET PROVISION A. This RPUD is subject to the Sunset Provisions of Chapter 10.02.13.D, of the LDC,as amended. B. An annual RPUD monitoring report shall be submitted pursuant to Chapter 10.02.13.F of the LDC,as amended. C. A proportional amount of the recreational facilities must be open and available for use by residents. 5.6 TRANSPORTATION The development of this RPUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. All traffic control devices, signs, pavement markings and design criteria shall be in accordance with Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Manual of Uniform Minimum Standards (MUMS), current edition, FDOT Design Standards, current edition, and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), current edition. All other improvements shall be consistent with and as required by the Collier County LDC. B. Arterial level street lighting shall be provided at all access points. Access lighting must be in place prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy(CO). C. Site-related improvements necessary for safe ingress and egress to this project, as determined by Collier County, shall not be eligible for impact fee credits. All required improvements shall be in place and available to the public prior to the issuance of the first CO. D. Road impact fees shall be paid in accordance with Collier County Consolidated Impact Fee Ordinances and LDC Sections 6.02.00 and 10.02.07,as amended. E. All work within Collier County rights-of-way or public easements shall require a right-of-way permit. V-3 F. All proposed median opening locations shall be in accordance with the Collier County Access Management Policy (Resolution No. 01-247), as it may be amended, and the LDC,as it may be amended. Collier County reserves the right to modify or close any median opening existing at the time of approval of this RPUD which is found to be adverse to the health, safety and welfare of the public. Any such modifications shall be based on, but are not limited to, safety, operational circulation, and roadway capacity. The exact location and final design of the access point on Collier Boulevard shall occur during SDP review. This design shall incorporate provisions for access to the three parcels immediately to the north of Amity Road. The developer shall coordinate with the County and/or the County's designee to ensure that the access locations and design are consistent with the 6-lane improvement plans for Collier Boulevard. G. Nothing in any development order shall vest a right of access in excess of a right in/right out condition at any access point. Neither shall the existence of a point of ingress, a point of egress or a median opening, nor the lack thereof, be the basis for any future cause of action for damages against the County by the developer, its successor in title,or assignee. H. All internal roads, driveways, alleys, pathways, sidewalks and interconnections to adjacent developments shall be operated and maintained by an entity created by the developer and Collier Country shall have no responsibility for maintenance of any such facilities. If any required turn lane improvement requires the use of existing County right- of-way or easement, compensating right-of--way, shall be provided without cost to Collier County as a consequence of such improvement. J. If, in the sole opinion of Collier County, a traffic signal, or other traffic control device, sign or pavement marking improvement within a public right-of-way or easement is determined to be necessary, the cost of such improvement shall be borne by the developer and shall be paid to Collier County before the issuance of the first CO. K. The PUD Master Plan depicts a shared access (interconnection) with an adjacent property to the north, as well as future connections to John's Road to the north and interconnection to the south to provide for potential future access from the project to Sabal Palm Road. In addition, the Master Plan depicts potential future interconnection to the north and south via the existing FPL easement, and proposes a future pedestrian interconnection to the Collier Regional Medical Center. The developer, or assigns, shall assure that these interconnections shall accommodate the perpetual use of such access by incorporating appropriate language into the applicable development covenants,and SDP or plat. V-4 L. Payment in lieu of sidewalks and bike lanes for Collier Boulevard frontage shall be required. The amount shall be determined utilizing FDOT's 2004 Transportation Costs, as amended. Payment shall be required within 30 days of approval of zoning petition by the Board of County Commissioners. M. At the request of Collier County, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) bus stop with shelter will be installed by the developer. The exact location will be determined during site development plan review; however, every effort shall be made for co- utilization of the CAT stop for a school bus pick-up and drop-off. This shall be coordinated with the Collier County School District. If co-utilization is determined not to be feasible, then a site for school bus drop-off and pick-up shall be provided internal to the site. N. The project shall be phased as follows: Phase One: Phase One shall be limited to a maximum of 80 dwelling units, of which a minimum of 50%shall be affordable units. Phase Two: Phase Two shall be limited to 142 dwelling units including any additional affordable units necessary to reach total of 111 affordable units. COs for these units shall not be issued until 2008. Phase Three: COs shall not be issued for the remaining 178 units prior to February of 2009. 5.7 WATER MANAGEMENT The development of this RPUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. Detailed paving, grading and site drainage plans shall be submitted to Engineering Review Services for review and approval. No construction permits shall be issued unless and until Planning Services Staff grants approval of the proposed construction in accordance with the approved plans. B. An excavation permit will be required for the proposed lakes in accordance with the LDC and South Florida Water Management District Rules. C. The project must obtain a Surface Water Management Permit from the South Florida Water Management District prior to any site development plan approval. 5.8 UTILITIES The development of this RPUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: V-5 A. Water distribution and sewage collection and transmission facilities to serve the project are to be designed, constructed, conveyed, owned, and maintained in accordance with Collier County Ordinance No. 04-31, as amended, and other applicable County rules and regulations. B. All customers connecting to the water distribution and sewage collection facilities will be considered to be customers of the County, and will be billed by the County in accordance with the County's established rates. 5.9 ENVIRONMENTAL The development of this RPUD Master Development Plan shall be subject to and governed by the following conditions: A. Environmental permitting shall be in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental Resource Permit Rules, and be subject to review and approval by Collier County Environmental Services Staff. All conservation areas shall be designated as "Preserve"tracts or easements on all construction plans, and shall be recorded on the plat with protective covenants per, or similar to, Section 704.06, Florida Statutes. Tracts or easements shall be dedicated on the plat to the homeowners association for ownership and maintenance and to Collier County with no responsibility for maintenance. If property is not to be platted, as may be the case with a multi-family Site Development Plan (SDP), a recorded conservation easement is required before SDP approval. B. Buffers shall be provided around wetlands, where possible, extending at least fifteen(1 5) feet landward from the edge of the wetland preserves in all places,and average twenty-five(25) feet from the landward edge of wetlands. Where natural buffers are not provided, structural buffers shall be provided in accordance with the State of Florida Environmental Resource Permit Rules, and be subject to review and approval by Environmental Services Staff. C. All principal structures shall have a minimum setback of 25 feet from the boundary of any preserve. Accessory structures and all other site alterations shall have a minimum 10-foot setback. Site alterations are prohibited within 10 feet of the preserve boundary unless it can be demonstrated that such alterations, included placement of fill or structural barriers within 10 feet of preserve boundary will not negatively impact the preserve. D. The petitioner shall comply with the guidelines and recommendations of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USF&WS) and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) regarding potential impacts to "listed species". A Habitat Management Plan for those protected species shall he submitted to Environmental Service Plan Review Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. V-6 E. An exotic vegetation removal, monitoring, and maintenance (exotic-free)plan for the site, with emphasis on the conservation/preservation areas (Preserve Area Management Plan), shall be submitted to Environmental Services Staff for review and approval prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. This plan shall include methods and a time schedule for removal of all Category I invasive exotic plants, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council, throughout the RPUD. All Category I invasive exotic plants, as defined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council, within preservation areas, shall be removed and subsequent annual removal of these plants (in perpetuity) shall be the responsibility of the property owner. F. All listed plant species found in areas of impact, including pop ash FLUCFCS code 616, shall be relocated by qualified biologists prior to development. Detailed relocation plan shall be reviewed and approved by Environmental Services staff prior to first development order approval. G. The RPUD, shall be consistent with the environmental sections of the Collier County GMP, Conservation and Coastal Management Element. Development within this RPUD shall be in conformance with the applicable provisions of the LDC in effect at the time of final development order approval. H. All approved agency(SFWMD,ACOE,FFWCC)permits shall be submitted prior to final site plan/construction plan approval. 5.10 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Accessory structures may be constructed simultaneously with, or following the construction of the principal structure, except for the clubhouse facilities, a construction operation/management office, and model center which may be constructed after zoning approval(See Sections 2.10 and 2.11 of this RPUD Document). 5.11 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS,BERMS,FENCES AND WALLS Landscape buffers, berms, fences and walls are generally permitted as principal uses throughout the Rockedge RPUD, except in Preserves. The following standards apply: A. Landscape berms may have the following maximum side slopes: 1) Grassed berms 4:1. 2) Ground covered berms 3:1. 3) Rip-Rap berms 2:1. 4) Structural walled berms may be vertical. B. Fence or wall maximum height, adjacent to Collier Boulevard: a fence or wall, or fence or wall and berm combination,not to exceed 8 feet in height,may be v-7 erected along the project's frontage on Collier Boulevard. All other fences or walls shall conform to the provisions of Section 5.03.02 of the LDC. C. Pedestrian sidewalks, bike paths, water management facilities and structures may be allowed in landscape buffer areas, provided that the landscape buffer area is increased by an equivalent width. 5.12 POLLING PLACES Pursuant to Chapters 2.01.04 and 4.07.06 of the LDC, provision shall be made for the future use of building space within common areas for the purposes of accommodating the function of an electoral polling place,only if requested by the Supervisor of Elections. An Agreement between the Developer and the Supervisor of Elections for the provision of polling places shall be recorded in the official records of the Clerk of the Circuit Court of Collier County, which shall be binding upon any and all successors in interest that acquire ownership of such common areas including homeowners' associations. 5.13 PARKS&RECREATION FACILITES In addition to any recreation facilities that the developer may choose to develop within the project, the developer shall install a playground to serve children ages 2-12 years old, which meets ASTM standards. This required playground/tot lot area will be provided prior to, but not later than, when CO's are issued for 35% of the allowable units for this project. V-8 • madam Is wismollorall Bali .r rw_yw I i anaen.��iiof1on i tfeik IP HYTa 45WSYW + '.. i, V .LI8I HX3 il Ill IIIIMI it M 1 • 12 I P` A 1 ill i 3 i'Ij{i!i -11• 1.1 i iPi i �P ; 4 li 9- 1i1Oni:(i;p: • 2 i u l iiislil{��l '; 4 ! ! li N iaiimiiilmiit i t i M f { t . 1 ingingrill 3 ti *. a il � ' ��) ' E app I 1 - lir 3. :i , , a ii, OEN MN II ®l1 = Pr i ; i fl-,51 1!- J.•31/11ARI 9Y 1 F 3 Exhibit"B" • • NAPLES HERITAGE • NAPLES GOLF AND COUNTRY CLUB 1 N HEG RAGE OLF SAN IN AND MARINO COUNTRY ,9 CLUB NAPLES NATIONAL I E GoI11 fOCLUB 1 1 .r 1 2 • S ■ THE CLUB ESTATES • SFNDOW- WATERFORD�W000 • ESTATES ��-1 FIRST ASSEMBLY NAPLES FOREST OF GOD 1 t3 cOUNTRY CLUB 1 4 1 if, 1 5 SWAMP HUNTF1G70N HAMMOCK PARK BUGGY WOODS COMMERCE OATS CENTER RATTLESNAKE HAMMO ROAD (C.R. 664) II \ 1 mil SIERRA PROJECT MEADOWS Pews LOCATION COLLEGEWOOD [...� COLLEGE / PARK EtNSON ../ /,j,// 2 3 2 4 CELY 21 2 2 NLLACE %/ COUNTRY 4 CLUB �./2 • SABAL PALM ROAD T ... . h at LELY. A R:•ORT COMMUNITY 0 U 0 ' 26 27 26 25 WINDING a7 CYPRESS DM • • U 44ti 33 34 33 36 • bs, c......z....\..... Bet 24. 2003 — 09:41:09 P:\2002\02-018J.01 Monsour PUD\0003 PU0 Reaoning\RPUD& Water Management Pfons\Erhlbils for PU0\2Di63X01.dwg OCT., 2003 cue"T WOODFIELD BUILDERS, LLC En en, N_ -S.pwi-Amc S a S &/4=p , on -IL a. • V-L .a., Planners,cTOzl o; A.S. T'��° NEWTOWN SQUARE RPUD 9050 North Horseshoe Olive.Soto 270 • 040cfD SY` VICINITY MAP N■pN=•F7o1Ne 34104 R.J.M. FiU iii3gr 1 ilo stc rm'' at: PROJECT(^ Z SHEET 1 FILE 2 6+ 23 AOS 26E,NUMBER.•` 2-0163•O NUMBER: 1 OF NUMBER:20163XO1 If(I + + 3 i PO t 1 1 iii. i'1,'1 * i E Ii i ;i I gill ' •( I ;111' el 111 ( !i1 ,.Jfl o1 ( W !+ ,,i ( 1' ! 1 i i 1 i I.'.1 3 ri' ��i l aaT iT i' `;11'n• i I� i ��j'I+1 , I I I >; ' !, 1 11 ;fiig1101B11/:11@!i Ili IBS! i1, :t 81 t Id in Y1 z 1 .t( l9;Ia,•�. 3f loll :�, i ,�I 1 t 111 411��i ;iii a 11 I g 1 1j 5 11 '4I 11f: n� 1 tti�1iI(1k1(t4ii ;' I t 11 lini#iii; 1111 i �. ,,it t I l�1 t1{,1 + . I,i I�`` tl h ! 41115P111119!11011�1 1 r 1 1 tf'I �i�►"}�{G!1 ! iii hi' ll u dI du:St.. v,v a��!(4�ii11 II(II((i + 1 E:ifiDiiiiiiKidiiiii( /1ii 1111/( 1 i!i11(Ii I 2 „ 1 12 + ti i ! A �1 q t i 1 I i;'' I Ili1 ,i , i 1 ,* I a+�1 L.A..... E Zm i ft 1 ► kIi 1 401, 14 ti 11 i Itot 11 41- 1 Rai E I 14 �i ) IN i t { it I Fi + I f4 ii h di 1 \\ IMO ef ie 1 \ � 1 + it -- —4--__-- `-----r— „,„0 ---_\__- I - - - - - -, --i--,- - --11. i fk. lir 01 I fs..,, '' i � — — 1 il10 I iI 1 ill ',�- 1; , '+; 3 a;; lilt] y � i 11 ( � , — 1N10 s E � , �� e I t I I 1 I l li if h� I ! ,. .. P.. ill— I 1 Li: —t--1 — _ ,1/2) �iwI41`Ll.:..'` - A,VUr w.a0. I ! 'w OVr,w7—�` I. AvM—JO-1HOro Onend`i .11 (ovvialnoe fAI'T700) L59 'N'0 1 „D„nvixa X10....111 lMt• 11..r1Yr..ltl�rr••M••1 1A") •• ��,clitir. gat*7f Gr 1c VC1a+�0,;1 .rn `'s r cairn crumciooM „„=-- ,� a 1114 Mr M. PE _� s3s1 mon AlIMd'31OWSONV'03d013N0W1 _ 3yN m1 G Y W { N 1 gi r,;�,fr.K::.:,f r"C1e: i F L R `< � f 1 IA lael l I. ' I p . 1: 2d4 -� h I ; Ij:4Fj a ! !lly. '.1 . -::NiNNNNN\ill - __q I q l f V tr11p ,y i l'i II E i t .++.. ply.l•a. 11___(l■ . , :i i4EFiFFFF(Ej96 �� Ir i 11 gi 1!.. ;1I1IH1J: 7• V3:o 1 1¢rl Niiiniffillntfi I 1F .I ■ j — l'..r vPU ldd-- q Fr c; i4. ki,., \U-reel—Vraretref—lararT-1ST Tit*/ • nilzi :',11 -; ;) . Si ,?' d s', r11q �[ 2S i F e g8 i j f lk h \I' g g— .111 q 1 _ 1 !�t III 1 \i is! l4 r !> =r; f !IF _ Eidlt j i.10 L-2.1 1 Cr: 'O .bit 1y 1 l I F I _ �, S i:r . r/ 1 Illa MwEdlik41; ti /MN ; � Il! �i] awwi��� I i ' s __,1 ` AVM JO JF19IU 1VNV3.00 ——--___...—._� �'•••.—.3 �,--^liu'Y'7lOwn31n06 a3t1�o7 _._. -__ 3134012/U 0M 113 iaos3a Ai31'au Prepared by: Marjorie M.Student-Stirling Ass'L Collier County Att'y. 3301 Tamiaml Trial East Naples,FL 34112 This space for recording AGREEMENT AUTHORIZING AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS AND IMPOSING COVENANTS ANP RESTRICTIONS ON REAL PROPERTY eh THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the Lo day of J une , 2006, by and between Woodfield Builders, LLC (the "Developer") and the Collier County Board of County Commissioners(the"Commission"),collectively,the"Parties." RECITALS: A. The Developer owns a tract of real property described in Exhibit"A"attached hereto and incorporated herein (The"Property"). Only 55.97 acres of the total project acreage of 76.46 acres is eligible for an affordable housing density bonus.. It is the Developers intent to construct a maximum of 404 residential units (the "Units") at a density of 5.23 units per gross acre on the entire Property and 6.59 units per acre on the eligible 55.97 acres. The gross acreage of Property Is 76.46 acres. The number of affordable Units constructed by Developer shall be 111 ,representing 30% percent of the total number of residential Units in the development generated from the eligible 55.97 acres. B. In order to construct the Units, the Developer must obtain a density bonus from the Commission for the Property as provided for in the Collier County Grgwth Management Plan Future Land Use Element and in the Collier County Affordable Housing Density Bonus Ordinance No. 90-89, now codified by Ordinance 04-41, as Land Development Code (LDC) § 2.06.00 et seq., which density bonus can only be granted by the Commission and utilized by the Developer in accordance with the strict limitations and applicability of said provisions. C. The Commission is willing to grant a density bonus to the Developer authorizing the construction of bonus Units on the Property, if the Developer agrees to construct affordable Units as specified in this Agreement. Page 1 of 21 Rev 9/3/20D3 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the approval and grant of the density bonus of 5.09 units per acre requested by the Developer and the benefits conferred thereby on the Property,and for other good and valuable consideration,the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the Developer and the Commission hereby covenant and agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The above Recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference. 2. Developer Agreements. The Developer hereby agrees that it shall construct 111 affordable Units which Units shall be sold in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and as specified by the attached Appendices A & B, Exhibits A, B, & C, and Appendix C, which Appendices are incorporated by reference herein and which constitute a part of this Agreement. a. The following provisions shall be applicable to the affordable Units: (1) Defined terms: In the event of a conflict between terms as defined in the LDC or in Ordinance No. 90-89, Section 4,the definitions of the LDC will control when applying or interpreting this Agreement. In addition to these defined terms and the applicability of LDC § 2.06.04 "Phasing° shall mean: (a) the phased construction of buildings or structures in separate and distinct stages as shown on a PUD master plan, subdivision master plan or site development plan;or(b)in developments where phased construction is not depicted on a PUD master plan, subdivision master plan or site development plan,the construction of buildings or structures in a clearly defined series of starts and finishes that are separate and distinct within the development. (2) Median Income. For the purposes of this Agreement, the median income of the area as defined by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) shall be the then current median income for the Naples Metropolitan Statistical Area, established periodically by HUD and published in the Federal Register, as adjusted for family size as shown on the tables attached hereto as Appendix A, Exhibit C,which Exhibit shall be adjusted from time to time in accordance with any adjustments that are authorized by HUD or any successor agency. In the event that HUD ceases to publish an established median income as aforesaid, the Parties hereto shall mutually agree to another reasonable and comparable method of computing adjustments in median income. (3) Eligibility and Qualification of Owner, Family Income eligibility is a three-step process: 1) submittal of an application by a prospective Owner; 2) verification of family housing unit provided under the affordable housing density bonus program prior to being qualified at the appropriate level of income(moderate income)in Page 2 of 21 accordance with this Section; 3) certification of eligible Owner by the Financial Administration and Housing Department. The Developer shall be responsible for qualifying Owners by accepting applications, verifying income and obtaining income certification for all affordable units in the subject development. All applications, forms and other documentation required by this Agreement shall be provided to the Financial Administration and Housing Department. Qualification by the Developer of any persons as an eligible Owner family shall be subject to review and approval in accordance with the monitoring and enforcement program in LDC§§2.06.05 and 2.06.06,respectively. (a) Application. A potential owner shall apply to the developer, owner, manager, or agent to qualify as a low income family for the purpose of owning and occupying an affordable housing unit pursuant to the affordable housing density bonus program. The Preliminary Application for Affordable Housing Unit shall be provided by the Financial Administration and Housing Department as shown in Appendix B, Exhibit A,attached to this Agreement and Incorporated by reference herein. (b) Income Verification and Certification. No affordable housing Unit In the development shall be sold whose household income has not been verified and certified in accordance with this Agreement and LDC§2.06.05. (c) Income Verification. The Developer shall obtain written verification from the potential occupant (including the entire household)to verify all regular sources of income (including the entire household). The most recent year's federal income tax return for the potential occupants (including the entire household)may be used for the purpose of income verification, attached to the Affordable Housing Applicant Income Verification form, including a statement to release information, occupant verification of the return, and a signature block with the date of application. The verification shall be valid for up to two hundred seventy(270)days prior to occupancy. Upon expiration of the 270 day period, the information may be verbally updated from the original sources for an additional 30 days,provided it has been documented by the person preparing the original verification. After this time, a new verification form must be completed. The Affordable Housing Applicant Income Verification form shall be provided by the Financial Administration and Housing Department as shown in Appendix B, Exhibit B, attached to this Agreement and incorporated by reference herein. (d) Income Certification. Upon receipt of the Preliminary Application for Affordable Housing Unit and Affordable Housing Applicant Income Verification form,the Developer shall require than an income certification form be executed by the potential occupant(including the entire household)prior to occupancy of the affordable housing Page 3 of 21 unit by the occupant. Income certification shall assure that the potential occupant has an appropriate household income which qualifies the potential occupant as an eligible family to occupy an affordable housing unit under the affordable housing density bonus program.The Affordable Housing Applicant Income Certification form shall be provided by the Financial Administration and Housing Department as shown in Appendix B, Exhibit C,is attached to this Agreement and is incorporated by reference herein. Random inspection of files containing required documentation to verify occupancy in accordance with this Agreement and LDC § 2.06.00, may be conducted by the Financial Administration and Housing Department upon reasonable notice. (4) Annual Progress and Monitoring Report.The Developer shall provide the Financial Administration and Housing Department an annual progress and monitoring report regarding the delivery of affordable housing units throughout the period of their construction and occupancy. The annual progress and monitoring report shall, at a minimum, provide any information reasonably required to insure compliance with LDC§ 2.06.00, or subsequent amendments thereto. The report shall be filed on or before September 30 of each year and the report shall be submitted by the Developer to the Financial Administration and Housing Department. Failure to complete and submit the monitoring report to the Financial Administration and Housing Department within sixty (60) days from the due date shall result in a penalty of up to fifty dollars ($50.00) per day unless a written extension not to exceed thirty (30) days is requested prior to expiration of the sixty(60)day submission deadline. No more than one such extension may be granted in a single year. (5) Occupancy Restrictions. No Affordable Unit in any building or structure on the Property shall be occupied by the Developer, any person related to or affiliated with the Developer,or by a resident manager. 3. Density Bonus. The Commission hereby acknowledges that the Developer has met all required conditions to qualify for a density bonus, in addition to the base residential density of 1_5 units per acre, and is therefore granted a density bonus of 5.09 density bonus units per acre for the eligible 55.97 acres, for a total density (total =density bonus units per acre X gross acreage) of§_,,_,5Q units/ac on the eligible 55.97 acres, pursuant to LDC § 2.06.00 The Commission further agrees that the Developer may construct thereon,in the aggregate a maximum number of 400 units on the Property provided the Developer is able to secure building permit(s)from Collier County. Page 4 of 21 4. Commission Agreement. During the term of this Agreement, the Commission acting through the Financial Administration and Housing Department or its successor(s) covenants and agrees to prepare and make available to the Developer any general information that it possesses regarding income limitations and restrictions which are applicable to the affordable Unit. 5. Violations and Enforcement a. Violations. It shall be a violation of this Agreement and LDC § 2.06.00 to sell or occupy, or attempt to sell or occupy, an affordable housing unit provided under the affordable housing density bonus program except as specifically permitted by the terms of this Agreement; or to knowingly give false or misleading information with respect to any information required or requested by the Financial Administration and Housing Department or by any other persons pursuant to the authority which is delegated to them by LDC § 2.06.00 Collier County or its designee shall have full power to enforce the terms of this Agreement. The method of enforcement for a breach or violation of this Agreement shall be at the option of the Commission by criminal enforcement pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.69, Florida Statutes,or by civil enforcement as allowed by law. b. Notice of Violation for Code Enforcement Board Proceedings. Whenever it is determined that there is a violation of this Agreement or of LDC § 2.06.00,that should be enforced before the Code Enforcement Board,then a Notice of Violation shall be issued and sent by the appropriate department by certified return- receipt requested U.S. Mail, or hand-delivery to the person or developer in violation. The Notice of Violation shall comply with the requirements for such Notices. c. Certificate of Occupancy. In the event that the Developer fails to maintain the affordable units in accordance with this Agreement or LDC § 2.06.00, as amended, at the option of the Commission, building permits or certificates of occupancy, as applicable, may be withheld for any future planned or otherwise approved unit located or to be located upon the Property until the entire project is in full compliance with this Agreement and with LDC§2.06.00,as amended. 6. Assianment by Commission. The Commission may assign all or part of its obligations under this Agreement to any other public agency having jurisdiction over the Property provided that it gives the Developer thirty(30)days advance written notice thereof. The Developer may not assign, delegate or otherwise transfer all or part of its duties,obligations,or promises under this Agreement to any successor in interest to the Property without the express written consent of the Director of Financial Administration and Housing Department, which consent may be withheld for any reason whatsoever. Page 5 of 21 Any attempt to assign the duties,obligations, or promises under this Agreement to any successor in interest to the Property without the express written consent of the Director of Financial Administration and Housing Department as required by this Section shall be void ab initio. Developer may appeal any denial of assignment to the Commission. 7. Severability, If any section,phrase, sentence or portion of this Agreement is for any reason held invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, and independent provision, and all other provisions shall remain effective and binding on the Parties. 8. Notice.Any notices desired or required to be given under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall either be personally delivered or shall be sent by mail, postage prepaid,to the Parties at the following addresses: To the Commission: Collier County Financial Administration and Housing Department 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 To the Developer: Woodfield Builders,LLC 6604 Ridgewood Avenue Naples,Florida 34108 Any Party may change the address to which notices are to be sent by notifying the other Party of such new address in the manner set forth above. 9. Authority to Monitor. The Parties hereto acknowledge that the Collier County Financial Administration and Housing Department or its designee, shall have the authority to monitor and enforce the Developer's obligations hereunder. 10. Indemnify. The Developer hereby agrees to protect, defend, indemnify and hold Collier County and its officers, employees, and agents harmless from and against any and all claims, penalties, damages, losses and expenses, professional fees, including, without limitation, reasonable attorney's fees and all costs of litigation and judgments arising out of any claim, willful misconduct or negligent act, error or omission, or liability of any kind made by Developer, its agents or employees, arising out of or incidental to the performance of this Agreement. 11. Covenants, The Developer agrees that all of its obligations hereunder shall constitute covenants,restrictions,and conditions which shall run with the land and shall be binding upon the Property and against every person then having any ownership interest at any time and from time to time until this Agreement is terminated in accordance with Section 14 below. However, the Parties agree that if Developer transfers or conveys the Property to another person or entity, Developer shall have no further obligation hereunder and any person seeking to enforce the terms hereof shall Page 0 of 21 look solely to Developers successor in interest for the performance of said obligations. 12. Recording.This Agreement shall be recorded at County's expense in the official records of Collier County,Florida. 13. Entire Aareement. The Parties hereto agree that this Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the Parties hereto and shall inure to and be binding upon their respective heirs,successors,and assigns. 14. Termination, Each affordable housing unit shall be restricted to remain and be maintained as the required affordable housing for a period of fifteen (15)years from the date of issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for said housing unit. 15. Modification. This Agreement shall be modified or amended only by the written agreement of both Parties. 16. Discrimination. a. The Developer agrees that neither it nor its agents shall discriminate against any owner or potential owner because of said owners race, color, religion,sex, national origin,familial status,or handicap. b. When the Developer advertises, sells or maintains the affordable housing unit, it must advertise sell, and maintain the same in a non-discriminatory manner and shall make available any relevant information to any person who is interested in purchasing such affordable housing unit. c. The Developer agrees to be responsible for payment of any real estate commissions and fees for which it is liable in the purchase and sale of affordable units. 17. The project shall be phased as follows: Phase One: Phase One shall be limited to a maximum of 80 dwelling units, of which a minimum of 50%shall be affordable units. Phase Two: Phase Two shall be limited to 142 dwelling units including any additional affordable units necessary to reach total of 111 affordable units. COs for these Phase Two units shall not be issued until 2008,and Phase Three: COs shall not be issued for the remaining 178 units prior to February of 2009. 18. Disclosure. The developer shall not disclose to persons, other than the potential buyer or lender of the particular affordable housing unit or units,which units in the development are designated as affordable housing units. 19. Consistency. This Agreement and authorized development shall be consistent with the Growth Management Plan and land development regulations of Page 7 of 21 Collier County that are in effect at the time of development.Subsequently adopted laws and policies shall apply to this Agreement and to the development to the extent that they are not in conflict with the number, type of affordable housing units and the amount of affordable housing density bonus approved for the development. 20. Affordable Housing Density Bonus Development Agreement. This Agreement is a distinct and separate agreement from "development agreements" as defined by Section 163.3220,Fla. Stat.,as amended. 21. Preappllcation. Developer has executed and submitted to the Development Services Department the Developer Application for Affordable Housing Density Bonus, a copy of which is attached to this Agreement as Appendix C and incorporated by reference herein. 22. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. 23. Further Assurances, The Parties hereto shall execute and deliver, in recordable form if necessary, any and all documents, certificates, instruments, and agreements which may be reasonably required in order to effectuate the intent of the Agreement. Such documents shall include but not be limited to any document requested by the Developer to exhibit that this Agreement has terminated in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 14 above. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the day and year first above written. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DWIGHT-5:ldCl ;.Clerk COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA•q)lie a .4 Li:4: Li__t ' ._._ A (a�t a5 fra;GlpUti Clerk By:`"�-RANK HALAS,C AN $Igno4±raVA:11 Approved as to form and legal sufficiency: Marjori M.Student-Stirling Assistant County Attorney Page 8 of 21 DEVELOPER: Witnesses: Woodfield Builders,LLC /eta% vim Witness 1 Printed Name—DIM( L- Crcttbri By, Witness Brian Mansour, Managing Member Printed Name Ae.e,nr, Krkj STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF COLLIER ) The foregoing Agreement Authorizing Affordable Housing Density Bonus And Imposing Covenants And Restrictions On Real Property was acknowledged before me by Brian Mansour as Managing Member of Woodfield Builders, LLC,who is nersonall known to me or has produced as identification. WITNESS my hand and official seal this /,21?--t day of 4x) 2006. J��J aJ Notary Public My Commission Expires: ulaau5IN COWc*SS10N I DD 349617 !!tt�� E%PIHES:Aupid 21,2066 Page 9 of 21 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION.NEWTOWN SQUARE PU) Section:23 Township:50 South Range:26 East A PARCEL OR.TRACT OF LAND SITUATED IN THE STATE OF FLORIDA,COUNTY OF COLLIER LYING IN SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,BEING MORE PARTICULARLY BOUNDED AND DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT A 4 INCH CONCRETE MONUMENT MARKING THE CENTER SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST; THENCE,ALONG THE EAST-WEST MID-SECTION LINE OF SAID SECTION 23,N.89.00'52"E., A DISTANCE OF 66438 FEET; THENCE,DEPARTING FROM SAID MID-SECTION LINE,S.01"13'49"W.,A DISTANCE OF 1,350.38 FEET; THENCE S.89°40'52"W.,A DISTANCE OF 662.16 FEET THENCE S.89°41'40"W.,A DISTANCE OF 1,325.03 FEET; THENCE N.01'00'34"E.,A DISTANCE OF 331.32 FEET; THENCE S.89-34'42"W.,A DISTANCE OF 993.80 FEET THENCE S.00'54'44"W.,A DISTANCE OF 329.05 FEET THENCE N.89°41'35"E.,A DISTANCE OF 331.01 FEET THENCE S.00'58'01"W.,A DISTANCE OF 330.10 FEET THENCE S.89'52'20"W.,A DISTANCE OF 561.91 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF A 100.00 FEET WIDE CANAL THAT RUNS PARALLEL TO AND 100 FEET EAST OF THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE,ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,N.00'5078"E.,A DISTANCE OF 984.20 FEET; THENCE,DEPARTING FROM SAID EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE,N.89'2349"E.,A DISTANCE OF 894.94 FEET; THENCE N.00'59'07"E.,A DISTANCE OF 662.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE SAID EAST-WEST MID- SECTION LINE; THENCE,ALONG SAID EAST-WEST MID-SECTION LINE,N.89'00'55"E.,A DISTANCE OF 996.67 FEET; THENCE,DEPARTING FROM SAID EAST-WEST MID-SECTION LINE,S.00'57'32"W.,A DISTANCE OF 327.91 FEET; THENCE N.88'58'25"E.,A DISTANCE OF 663.65 FEET THENCE N.01'05'18"E,A DISTANCE OF 327.46 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING 3,330,396 SQUARE FEET OR 76.46 ACRES,MORE OR LESS. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 23,AS HAVING AN ASSUMED BEARING OF N.00.50'28"E. Page 10 of 21 APPENDIX A,EXHIBIT A (NOT APPLICABLE) NUMBER OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS/MONTHLY BASE RENTS NUMBER OF UNITS BASE RENT Single Multi Single Multi Family Family Family Family LOW INCOME (60%MI) Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom TOTAL VERY LOW INCOME (50%MI) Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom TOTAL VERY-VERY LOW INCOME (25%-50%MI) Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom 4 Bedroom TOTAL (l) Base residential density allowed in this development units/acre. (2) Gross acreage (3)Maximum number of affordable housing density bonus units allowed in this development pursuant to LDC Section 2.06.00. units. (4)Gross residential density of this development(including affordable housing density bonus units)_ units/acre. (5)Percentage of affordable units pledged by the developer(as a percent of the total number units in the development) %. Page 11 of 21 APPENDIX A,EXHIBIT B AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS RATING SYSTEM NOT APPLICABLE PER FUTURE L USE ELEMENT LDC § 2.06.03, provides for calculation of a density bonus for developers pledging to construct affordable units within their development. Included in this Exhibit B are instructions for and the tables with which to calculate the density bonus for a particular project. Exhibit C contains the current median income and acceptable rents for low and very low income households in Collier County. The affordable housing density bonus rating system shall be used to determine the amount of the affordable housing density bonus which may be granted for a development based on household income level, number of bedrooms per affordable housing unit, type of affordable housing units (owner-occupied or rental, single-family or multi-family) and percentage of affordable housing units in the development. To use the affordable housing density bonus rating system,Tables A and B,below,shall be used. Tables A and B shall be reviewed and updated if necessary on an annual basis by the Board of County Commissioners or its designee. First, choose the household income level (moderate, low, or very low) of the affordable housing unit(s) proposed in the development, and the type of affordable housing units (owner-occupied or rental, single-family or multi-family, where applicable) to be provided, as shown in Table A. Then,referring again to Table A,choose the number of bedrooms proposed for the affordable housing unit(s). An affordable housing density bonus rating based on the household income level and the number of bedrooms is shown in Table A. After the affordable housing density bonus rating has been determined in Table A,locate it in Table B, and determine the percent of that type of affordable housing unit proposed in the development compared to the total number of dwelling units in the development. From this determination,Table B will indicate the maximum number of residential dwelling units per gross acre that may be added to the base density. These additional residential dwelling units per gross acre are the maximum affordable housing density bonus(AHDB)available to that development. Developments with percentages of affordable housing units which fall in between the percentages shown on Table B shall receive an affordable housing density bonus equal the lower of the two percentages it lies between plus 1/10th of a residential dwelling unit per gross acre for each additional percentage of affordable housing rental units in the development. For example, a development which has 24%of its total residential dwelling units as affordable housing units,and which has an affordable housing density bonus rating of"four"will receive an affordable housing density bonus(AHDB)of 4.4 residential dwelling units per gross acre for the development. Where more than one type of affordable housing unit (based on level of income and number of bedrooms shown in Table A)is proposed for a development, the affordable housing density bonus for each type shall be calculated separately in Table B. After the affordable housing density bonus calculations for each type of affordable housing unit have been completed in Table B,the affordable housing density bonus for each type of unit shall be added to those for the other type(s) to determine the maximum affordable housing density bonus available for the development. In no event shall the affordable housing density bonus exceed eight(8)dwelling units per gross acre. Page f2 of 21 APPENDIX A.EXHIBIT B AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS RATING SYSTEM NOT APPLICABLE PER FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT Please calculate your density bonus in the space provided below.Attach additional pages If necessary. TABLE A:AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS RATING LEVEL NUMBER OF BEDROOMS/UNIT OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME EFFICIENCY 2 3 OR AND 1 _ MORE 80%MI=MODERATE(OWNER-OCCUPIED, 0 1* 1* SINGLE-FAMILY) 60%MI=LOW(OWNER-OCCUPIED OR.RENTAL 2 3 4 SINGLE-FAMILY OR MULTI- FAMILY) 50%MI=VERY LOW(OWNER OCCUPIED OR RENTAL,SINGLE-FAMILY OR MULTI-FAMILY) 3 4 5 *For cluster housing developments in the Urban Coastal Fringe,add 1 density bonus to obtain 2. TABLE B:AFFORDABLE HOUSING DENSITY BONUS (ADDITIONAL AVAILABLE DWELLING UNITS PER GROSS ACRE) AFFORDABLE HOUSING %OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS DENSITY BONUS RATING 10% 20% 30°4 40°4 1 0 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 3 3 2 3 4 5 4 3 4 5 7 5 4 5 7 8 Page 13 of 21 APPENDIX A,EXHIBIT C INCOME AND RENT LEVELS FOR THE LOW AND MODERATE INCOME. Pursuant Chapter 74,Section 74-402(a)(1);Collier County Code of Laws and Ordinances, moderate income is 61%to 80%of the median income,low income is 51%to 60%of the median income and very low income is less than 50%of the median income. MEDIAN INCOME 2005 $63,300 Naples,MSA(Collier County) NUMBER OF MEMBERS IN FAMILY 1 2 3 4 ¢ ¢ 7 8 80% 39,100 44,650 50,250 55,850 60,300 64,750 69,250 73,700 60% 29,340 33,480 37,680 41,880 45,240 48,600 51,960 55,260 50% 24,450 27,900 31,400 34,900 37,700 40,500 43,300 46,050 35% 17,115 19,530 21,980 24,430 26,390 28,350 30,310 32,235 25% 12,225 13,950 15,700 17,450 18,850 20,250 21,650 23,025 RECOMMENDED RENTAL RATES The Florida Housing Finance Corporation(FHFC)calculates rents to use in the State Apartment Incentive Loan(SAIL)and the Low-Income Rental Housing Tax Credit(LIHTC)programs. The rents given below are based on 2001 data from FHFC. Utility costs are provided from the County's Section 8 Rental Assistance Program which is administered by the Collier County Housing Authority. HOUSING COSTS BASED ON 30%FAMILY INCOME ONE TWO THREE FOUR BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM BEDROOM UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT 80% $1,046 $1,256 $1,451 $1,618 60% $785 $942 $1,089 $1,215 50% $654 $785 $907 $1,012 35% $458 $549 $635 $708 25% $327 $392 $453 $506 UTILITY ALLOWANCES ONE B/R TWO B/R THREE B/R FOUR B/R LOCATION UNIT UNIT UNIT UNIT Naples and Coastal Collier County 71.00 91.00 128,00 156.00 Immokalee and East of Everglades Blvd. 67.00 106.00 148.00 173.00 Golden Gate 96,00 144.00 186.00 211.00 YOU MUST DEDUCT UTILITIES TO CALCULATE NET RENTS. Page 14 of 21 APPENDIX B.EXHIBIT A PRELIMINARY APPLICATION FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT Date Occupancy Desired: Date of Application: Amt.Of Sec.Deposit: Your Name: Race/National Origin:Handicap:Yes_ No Co-Tenant Name Race/National Origin:Handicap:Yes No_ Present Address: Street City State Zip Telephone No. Name of Landlord How Long at this Address: Landlord's Address: Street City State Zip Telephone No. If you have resided at your present address less than 3 years,please state previous address: Street City State Zip Telephone No. Name of Previous Landlord Street City State Zip Telephone No. APPLICANT: Present Employers Name Address and Telephone No. How long with Present Employer: Job Title Gross Salary: Hourly$ Weekly$ Every 2 Weeks$ Monthly$ Social Security Number Birth Date --- Previous Employers Name Address and Telephone No. How long with Previous Employer Job Title CO-TENANT: Present Employers Name Address and Telephone No. How long with Present Employer: Job Title Gross Salary: Hourly$ Weekly$ Every 2 Weeks$ Monthly$ Social Security Number Birth Date Previous Employers Name Address and Telephone No. How long with Previous Employer Job Title NAMES OF ALL WHO WILL OCCUPY APARTMENT BIRTH DATE g( Ara SOCIAL SECURITY 1. 3. PERSONAL REFERENCES(Not Retativesl Page 15 of 21 1. Name: Address: How Long Known: 2. Name: Address: How Long Known: APPENDIX B, EXHIBIT B AFFORDABLE HOUSING APPLICANT INCOME VERIFICATION Date: Applicant's Name: Social Security Number Co-Tenant's Name:: Social Security Number Present Address: Street City State Zip Telephone No. I hereby make application for a single family unit at I hereby declare and reveal all of my sources of income. I am aware that to leave out,omit or fail to report my assets or forms of income from pensions, stocks, bonds, real property rent, sale or ownership is a fraudulent act punishable by law. Knowingly falsifying information on this form is cause for refusal of occupancy. I hereby certify that this will be my permanent residence and that I have no other assisted housing. I understand that this information is for the purpose of computing my annual income to determine my qualification to buy an affordable housing unit. I understand that I am not required to surrender my ownership or rights or claimed property,pensions or capital gains,etc. Applicant Co-Occupant Amount Frequency Amount Frequency Received of Pay Received of Pay Wages/Salary $ $ $ $ Bonuses $ $ $ $ Tips $ $ $ $ Commissions $ $ $ $ Interest Income $ $ $ $ Trust Fund Income $ $ $ $ Unemployment $ $ $ $ Workman's Compensation $ _ $ $ $ Welfare $ _ $ $ $ Food Stamps $ $ $ $ Social Security $ $ _ $ $ Social Security Disability $ $ $ $ Supplemental SSI $ $ $ $ Family Assistance $ $ $ $ Child Support $ $ $ $ Veterans Benefits $ $ $ $ Widows Benefits $ $ $ $ Union Pension $ $ $ S Self-Employment Business, Silent Partner,etc. $ $ $ $ Private Insurance Pension $ $ $ $ TOTAL ANNUAL INCOME $ $ THE VERIFICATION HERE REQUESTED MAY TAKE THE FORM OF THE MOST RECENT YEAR'S INCOME TAX RETURN FOR EACH OCCUPANT WHO HAS FILED AND WILL OCCUPY THE AFFORDABLE UNTO. THE SAME MUST BE EXECUTED FOR EACH OCCUPANT OF THE HOUSEHOLD WHO CONTRIBUTED TO THE ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME. FAILURE TO REPORT ALL SOURCES OF HOUSEHOLD INCOME WILL RESULT IN DISQUALIFICATION FOR TENANCY IN AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNIT. Page 16 of 21 APPENDIX B,EXHIBIT C AFFORDABLE HOUSING APPLICANT INCOME CERTIFICATION APPLICANT: Present Employer: Job Title: Address: Street City State Zip I, ,hereby authorize the release of information requested (Applicant) on this certification form. Signature of Applicant STATE OF FLORIDA ) )ss COUNTY OF COLLIER) The foregoing was acknowledged before me by Who is personally known to me or has produced as identification. Witness my hand and official seal this day of ,2005. (notary seal) Notary Public My Commission Expires: EMPLOYER CERTIFICATION Applicant's Gross Annual Income or Rate or Pay: $ Number of Hours Worked(Weekly): . Frequency of Pay: Amount of Bonuses,Tips,or other Compensation Received: $ $ Monthly Annually Supervisor STATE OF FLORIDA ) )ss COUNTY OF COT,L IFE) The foregoing was acknowledged before me by Who is personally known to me or has produced as identification. Witness my hand and official seal this day of ,2005. (notary seal) Notary Public My Commission Expires: THE CERTIFICATION HERE REQUESTED MAY TAKE THE FORM OF THE MOST RECENT YEAR'S INCOME TAX RETURN FOR EACH OCCUPANT WHO HAS FILED AND WILL OCCUPY THE AFFORDABLE UNIT. Page 18 of 21 APPENDIX C DEVELOPER APPLICATION FOR AFFORDABLE ROUSING DENSITY BONUS Pursuant to LDC § 2.06.01 please complete this form and submit it with any accompanying documentation to the Community Development & Environmental Services Division, 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Naples, Florida 34104. A copy must also be provided to the Financial Administration and Housing Department. All items requested must be provided. 1. Please state what zoning districts are proposed by the applicant,if any,on the property and the acreage of each; Planned Unit Development on 76.46 acres 2. Has an application for rezoning been requested in conjunction with the affordable housing Density bonus? g Yes No If yes,state date of application November 5,2003 and if the request has been approved,state the Ordinance number 3. Gross density of the proposed development. 5.23 units/acre. Gross acreage of the proposed development. 76.46 acres. 4. Are affordable housing density bonus units sought in conjunction with an application for a planned unit development(PUD)? Fd Yes No. If yes,please state name and location of the PUD and any other identifying information. _._ Rockedee PUD on Collier Boulevard 5. Name of applicant Woodfield Builders,LLC Name of land developer if not the same as Applicant: 6. Please complete the following tables as they apply to the proposed development. TABLE I Total Number of Units in Development Type of Owner Unit Rental Occupied Efficiency 0 One Bedroom 0 Two Bedroom 0 Three Bedroom 0 Other Bedroom _0 TOTAL Q__ 400*Mix of number of bedrooms units to be Determined according to market demand. Page 19 of 21 • TABLE II Number of Affordable Housing Units Total Number of Proposed Use for Affordable Units Density Bonus Units in Development Owner Owner Rental Occupied Rental, Occupied MODERATE INCOME 80%MI Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 111* 3 Bedroom Other TOTAL 111 *minimum size,any or all may be increased to 3 bedroom units LOW INCOME 60%MI Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom Other TOTAL VERY LOW INCOME 50%MI Efficiency 1 Bedroom 2 Bedroom 3 Bedroom Other TOTAL Page 20 of 21 7. Please provide a physical description of the affordable units by type of unit(moderate, low, very low income)and by number of bedrooms. Include in your description,for example,the square footage of each type of unit,floor coverings used throughout the unit(carpeting,tile,vinyl flooring); window treatments; appliances provided such as washer/dryer, dishwasher, stove, refrigerator; bathroom amenities, such as ceiling exhaust fans; and any other amenities as applicable. Attach additional pages as Exhibit"D"if needed. *Wood frame or CBS construction *30—year architectural shingles *Concrete driveways,walks,and entries. * R-30 insulation in attics and R13 insulation on exterior walls. *Ceramic or vinyl tile flooring,or carpeting,in all kitchens,baths,bedrooms,and laundry areas. *Wood or composite kitchen cabinets with fully adjustable shelves *Complete kitchen appliances,including a microwave oven,range,refrigerator,and disposal *High efficiency air conditioning with heat pump. *Land Development Code minimum landscaped private yards. *Dual sinks in the master bath. *Aluminum framed windows. *Metal clad entry door with dead bolt lock. *Pre-wiring for cable television,telephone and a digital perimeter security alarm system 8. Please supply any other information which would reasonably be needed to address this request for an affordable housing density bonus for this development. Attach additional pages if needed. 478937.11[523 0001 Page 21 of 21 STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) I, DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the Twentieth Judicial Circuit, Collier County, Florida, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a true and correct copy of ORDINANCE 2006-31 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on the 6th day of June, 2006, during Regular Session. WITNESS my hand and the official seal of the Board of County Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 14th day of June, 2006 . DWIGHT E. BROCK Clerk of Courts and_Cle'i;,1s Ex-officio to Board of County Commissioners (i1),,ka. lBy: Heidi R. Rockhold, Deputy Clerk NIM Summary Rockedge RPUD Neighborhood Information Meeting Summary The meeting was held on Monday, October 5, 2015 at 5:30pm at 6020 Rattlesnake Hammock Rd.,Naples, FL 34113. Those in attendance included Patrick Vanasse, AICP with RWA; Ashley Caserta with RWA; Collier County Principal Planner Daniel Smith, AICP; Sean Martin, P.E., representing Waterman Development Group; and five members of the public. Patrick began the meeting with a presentation that included the following: The Rockedge RPUD was originally approved in 2006 through Ordinance 06-31. The existing RPUD allows a maximum of 400 units on± 74.46 acres. The subject property is located in the northeast the intersection of County Road 951 and Sabal Palm Road in Section 23, Township 50,Range 26 East, Collier County. Ownership of the subject property has changed and revised development intent is being pursued through this PUD application. Watermen at Rockedge Naples, LLC now owns the PUD and they are adding ±31.91 acres of land to the existing PUD. As part of the PUD Amendment/Rezone application, the new owner is requesting to modify project boundaries, revise the PUD Master Plan, eliminate the Affordable Housing Density Bonus Agreement (AHDBA), reduce the allowed density, allow the full range of residential land uses, refine development standards, add deviations and shed PUD commitments. Patrick explained that the request can summarized as follows: • Increase the project's acreage from±74.46 acres to±106.67 acres. • Eliminate the AHDBA agreement and reduce the allowed density from 400 units to 266 units. • The RPUD's density will be derived from base density and Transfer of Development Rights for a maximum density of 2.5 units per acre. • Revise the PUD Master Plan to include additional lands. • Revise the PUD Master plan to reflect a new project layout. • Increase the preserve from±21.86 acres to±24.20 acres. • Locate the project's access along Sabal Palm Road. • Allow the full range of residential uses including single family detached, single family attached,zero lot line, duplex,two-family attached,townhouse, and multifamily units. • Revise the developments standards table to add standards for expanded housing types. • Add deviations and provide a list of deviations. • Revise the Developer Commitments to reflect changed conditions and eliminate many of the redundant commitments pursuant to direction from County Staff. Attachment C Public questions included: Public: Why in the access off of Sabal Palm and not Collier Boulevard? Patrick Vanasse: Currently, Collier Boulevard is a high-speed, high-traffic roadway. Sabal Palm is considered more controlled with the directional median, as well as safer because there is less traffic on the road. Public: Are all of the units single-family? Patrick Vanasse: Single-family units are planned for,however, other unit types are allowed. Public:Noted that a lot of dirt is expected. Patrick Vanasse and Sean Martin: Management of access and safety are a top priority. The meeting concluded at 6:00pm. 1 DEVIATION JUSTIFICATIONS Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS Deviation#1 seeks relief from LDC, Section 6.06.01.N which requires minimum local street right- of-way width of 60 feet,to allow a 50'right-of-way width for the internal streets that include public utilities. Minimum right-of-way width of 50 feet is requested for local streets within the Rockedge RPUD. This deviation is justified because this will be a private gated community with controlled access, low traffic volumes and a low posted speed limit.A 50 foot right-of-way for a residential street can successfully facilitate movement of the vehicular,pedestrian and bike traffic while accommodating all utility and drainage needs. In addition, a 10'PUE will be provided on each side of the right of way to accommodate "dry utilities."The 50 foot right-of-way results in a more compact roadway cross-section which accomplishes traffic calming to provide a safer transportation system within the community. This deviation is commonly approved and has been effectively implemented in numerous residential PUDs throughout the County and will not affect public health and safety. Deviation#2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C,which permits a maximum wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts,to allow a maximum wall height of 8'along the perimeter of the project and where abutting an existing public roadway,and allow a 12'tall wall/berm combination. The proposed deviation will allow for additional visual screening from adjacent properties and noise attenuation from the significant traffic along C.R. 951. Approval of this deviation will serve to promote public health, safety and welfare, as well as enhance the aesthetic appeal of the proposed community and general area. This deviation is commonly approved and has been effectively implemented in numerous residential PUDs throughout the County. Deviation#3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e,which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height,to allow a temporary banner sign,along C.R. 951,up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area.The temporary banner sign shall be limited to a maximum of 90 days per calendar year during season defined as January 1 to March 31. This deviation will remain in force until the project is sold out. The proposed deviation will allow for a banner sign along C.R. 951 in order to advertise new homes available within the community. The 4 square foot banner sign permitted by the LDC provides minimal visibility and likely will not be seen by motorists travelling along C.R. 951 due to the relatively high travel speeds along that corridor and the significant distance from the travel lanes to the project boundary.Additionally, the applicant is requesting that the banner be allowed for up to 90 days per calendar year to allow display throughout the peak winter season for home sales. This deviation would remain in force until the project is sold out. Due to the property's location on a busy arterial road, distance from the travel lanes, and the high travel speeds along the roadway, the Applicant is seeking an increase to the allowable banner size to ensure visibility of this new community during peak sales season. The requested banner size is in accordance with deviations approved for similar residential projects throughout the County. Attachment D Deviation#4 seeks relief from LDC Section S.06.02.B.5,which requires on-premise directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10' from edge of roadway,to allow a setback of 5' edge of roadway/drive aisle. This deviation will provide locational flexibility for directional signage internal to the RPUD.A unified design theme will be utilized for all signage throughout the community, thereby ensuring a cohesive appearance and increased aesthetic appeal. All directional signage will meet the Clear Sight Distance requirements in accordance with LDC Section 60.06.05. Furthermore, this deviation is typical of many of the master planned developments throughout Collier County. Deviation#5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.14,which allows one(1)boundary marker sign or monument structure at each property corner with a sign face no more than 24 square feet,to allow the option of one(1)monument sign along C.R. 951 with a sign face of 64 square feet,rather the tow(2)boundary markers that would be allowed per code. This deviation is requested since the project's access point is along Sabal Road and does not have an access point along C.R. 951. The entrance ground signs, which typically provide a project's highest visibility, will be tucked away down Sabal Road which is a two-lane local roadway. For this project, the one larger monument sign, rather than the two boundary markers allowed per code would act similarly to entrance signs by providing visibility along C.R. 951 and alerting motorists to this project's location.As such, this request asks for option of providing one monument structure sign along C.R. 951 with a sign face of 64 sf, as allowed for entrance signs, rather than the 2 boundary markers with a sign face of 24 sf as would be allowed by code. It should be noted that the LDC currently allows for boundary markers or monument structures, which is consistent with our deviation. The project's unique set of circumstances with its entrance tucked away down Sabal Road, and the high-volume and high-speed nature of C.R. 951, warrants this deviation which will improve the project's visibility and improve safety conditions. Given the wide C.R. 951 right of way, the multi-use path and the significant drainage canal, the one larger sign will be located a considerable distance from travel lanes, which warrants a larger sign face to enhance visibility. Lastly, the larger sign will be consistent with the project's unified design and branding approach. Deviation#6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.04.D.1,which prohibits doors and windows on the zero lot line portion of a dwelling unit,to allow windows. This deviation is requested to alleviate an oversight in the LDC which prohibits doors and windows on the zero lot line portion of a dwelling unit. While it is understandable that no doors should be allowed on the zero lot line side, a minimum 10'separation is require for zero lot line units which provides adequate separation between units.Moreover, this minimum separation is the same as what is required for detached single family homes in this PUD. Deviation#7 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.1 which requires cul-de-sac lengths not to exceed 1,000 feet,to allow±2,500 for the one dead-end street identified on the RPUD Master Plan. This deviation is requested to allow a,functional subdivision design because of the unique configuration of this PUD. Due to the unique land assemblage and project configuration, the portion of the PUD located along CR 951 does not allow for a looped road or interconnection to other portions of the PUD.A street layout that would avoid a cul-de-sac is not feasible given the narrow depth of the tract along CR 951, the inability to connect back to Sabal Palm Road or other portions of the project, and the impracticality of connecting to CR 951. However, the cud-de sac is designed with a hammerhead at its terminus in order to allow a potential future interconnection with the adjacent property that could provide secondary access onto Sabal Palm Road. The hammerhead is compliant with LDC requirements and design criteria from the Fire District. This deviation has been granted for subdivisions throughout the County, and does not compromise health, safety, and welfare issues related to civil engineering design. Deviation#8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.3.e which limits temporary use permits for model homes to 3 years,to allow a temporary use permit of 5 years without the need to request approval of a Conditional Use petition. This deviation is requested to allow temporary permits for model homes to be a duration of 5 years which is consistent with the projected buildout of this community as outlined in the T1S. It is reasonable and appropriate to have model homes available to tour during the entire sales and buildout period The models will be clustered in one area and separated from occupied homes as much a practicable in order to minimize any potential or perceived impact to future residents. The LDC already allows this use on a temporary basis,provides a standard time limitation that applies to all developments and requires a Conditional Use to determine if the extended period is adequate. The Conditional Use process is redundant and not required in this case since the PUD process provides oversight and the ability to determine the project's buildout period Deviation#9 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07.H.3.a.,which requires a minimum 25' preserve setback for all principal structures to allow a 12.5' side yard setback from preserves for principal structures where identified on the RPUD Master Plan.The reduced setback is allowed in combination with a structural buffer as allowed by the SFWMD. Preserve setbacks are required to provide access to and around the preserve, to limit human encroachment into the preserve and to allow for maintenance of the abutting residential structures. Reducing the required setback for 3 specific locations identified on the Master Plan where a sideyard abuts a preserve will not adversely affect the preserve or the intent behind the preserve setback. It will not impede access, encourage human encroachment or reduce the ability to conduct maintenance. The reduced setback would be allowed in combination with a structural buffer as allowed by the SFWMD and consistent with LDC Section 3.05.07.F.3.(f), which allows buffers adjacent to wetlands in the RFMU district to be reduced by 50%if a structural buffer is provided. This buffer can be in the form of a stem-wall, berm, or vegetative hedge with suitable fencing. Deviation#10 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4,which requires a 20' Type D buffer along perimeter boundaries abutting a right-of-way for all developments of 15 acres or more,to a allow a 15' Type D buffer adjacent to right-of-ways where identified on the RPUD Master Plan. The Type D Buffer is specific to project boundaries abutting right-of-ways and requires varying buffer widths depending on the ultimate width of the abutting right of way. LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4: "Where the ultimate width of the right-of-way is zero to 99 feet, the corresponding landscape buffer shall measure at least ten feet in width. Where the ultimate width of the right-of-way is 100 or more feet, the corresponding landscape buffer shall measure at least 15 feet in width. Developments of 15 acres or more and developments within an activity center shall provide a perimeter landscape buffer of at least 20 feet in width regardless of the width of the right- ofway " The buffer widths acknowledge the varying degree of intensity associated with different roadways. It is generally accepted that major roadways that will have greater noise, lighting, and general traffic impacts than a narrower local roads, and therefore require wider buffers. If not for the fact that this project is greater than 15 acres, the buffer requirements for the areas subject to this deviation would be for a 10'buffer since all three areas abut right-of-way easements less than 99 feet. Moreover, two of the roadways(John's Road and Melrose Lane) act as private driveways to a single family residence. The third location abuts Amity Road, which acts an access drive to a few existing homes. It should also be noted that all three roadway easements do not have the potential to be expanded into major roadways and will only accommodate local traffic into the future. Typically projects of 15 acres or more will abut major roadways and are not subject to numerous right-of-way easements that serve very limited number of households. The unique land assemblage and PUD configuration has resulted in a situation where this PUD does abut three "limited service"rights-of-way. Where abutting major roadways, 20'Type D Buffers are provide; however, the same buffer width is not warranted where abutting road rights-of way that essentially act as private access drives. It should be noted that this deviation will require the same amount of plantings as a 20'wide buffer, but within a narrower buffer strip. Lastly, the requested 15'buffer width will be consistent with the rest of the buffers for this project. Co er County COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.coiiiergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 i Application for a Public Hearing for PUD Rezone, Amendment to PUD or PUD to PUD Rezone PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED i PUD Rezone(PUDZ): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F., Ch.3 G. 1 of the Administrative Code Amendment to PUD(PUDA): LDC subsection 10.02.13 E. and Ch, 3 G. 2 of the Administrative Code C PUD to PUD Rezone(PUDZ-A): LDC subsection 10.02.13 A.-F. APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Watermen at Rockedge Naples, LLC. Address: 265 Sevilla Avenue City: Coral Gables State: FL Zip: 33134 Telephone: 239-872-0910 Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: smartin @watermengroup.corn Name of Agent: Patrick Vanasse, AICP Firm: RWA, Inc. Address: 6610 Willow Park Drive, Suite 200 City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34109 Telephone: 239-597-0575 Cell: Fax: 239-597-0578 , E-Mail Address: pvanasse @consult-rwa,com Richard Yovanovich, Esq.Colerman Yovanovich&Koester,PA 4001 Tamimai Trial North, Suite 300, Naples, FL 34103 239-435-3535 ryovanovich©cyklawfirm.com Be aware that Collier County has lobbyist regulations.Guide yourself accordingly and ensure that you are in compliance with these regulations. Attachment E 10/23/2013 Page 1 of 16 Coca er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE , GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Please complete the following information,if space is inadequate use additional sheets and attach to the completed application packet. a. If the property is owned fee simple by an INDIVIDUAL, tenancy by the entirety, tenancy in common,or joint tenancy, list all parties with an ownership interest as well as the percentage of such interest: Name and Address %of Ownership b. If the property is owned by a CORPORATION, list the officers and stockholders and the percentage of stock owned by each: Name and Address %of Ownership c. If the property is in the name of a TRUSTEE, list the beneficiaries of the trust with the percentage of interest: Name and Address %of Ownership f d. If the property is in the name of a GENERAL or LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, list the name of the general and/or limited partners: Name and Address %of Ownership Eddy Garcia-Manager 50 Kassandra Fajardo-Garcia- Manager 50 Watermen at Rockedge Naples,LLC 265 Sevilla Ave.Coral Gables,FL 33134 10/23/2013 Page 2 of 16 Co ei County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.coliiergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 e. If there is a CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE, with an individual or individuals, a Corporation, Trustee, or a Partnership, list the names of the contract purchasers below, including the officers,stockholders, beneficiaries, or partners: Name and Address %of Ownership Purchaser-Watermen at Rockedge Naples/Owner-Betty Mason/Parcel 00434840001 100 Pureness-Watermen at Rockedge Naples I Owner-East Naples Fire and Rescue District/Parcels 00433120007,00433080004 100 Date of Contract: Please provide date Mason contract : 1/15/2014 ; Fire District Contract : 8/13/2014 f. If any contingency clause or contract terms involve additional parties, list all individuals or officers,if a corporation, partnership,or trust: Name and Address g. Date subject property acquired PLeased:Term of lease years/months Petitioner has option to buy, indicate the following: Date of option: Date option terminates: ,or Anticipated closing date: h. Should any changes of ownership or changes in contracts for purchase occur subsequent to the date of application, but prior to the date of the final public hearing, it is the responsibility of the applicant,or agent on his behalf,to submit a supplemental disclosure of interest form. 10/23/2013. Page 3 of 16 col er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.collierxov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 REZONE REQUEST This application is requesting a rezone from: RPUD,and"A"Agricultural Zoning district(s) to the RPUD zoning district(s). Present Use of the Property: Vacant Proposed Use(or range of uses)of the property: Residential Planned Unit Development Original PUD Name: Rockedge RPUD Ordinance No.: 06-31 PROPERTY INFORMATION On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: • If the request involves changes to more than one zoning district,the applicant shall include a separate legal description for property involved in each district; • The applicant shall submit 4 copies of a recent survey (completed within the last six months, maximum 1°to 400'scale), if required to do so at the pre-application meeting; and • The applicant is responsible for supplying the correct legal description. If questions arise concerning the legal description, an engineer's certification or sealed survey may be required. Section/Township/Range:23 150S/26E Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes& Bounds Description: See attached Plat Book: Page#: Property I.D. Number: Size of Property: ft.x ft.= Total Sq. Ft. Acres: +/'107 Address/General Location of Subject Property: NE corner of Saba' Palm and Collier Blvd. PUD District(refer to LDC subsection 2.03.06 C): [1Commercial nResidential Community Facilities Industrial Mixed Use COther: 10/23/2013 Page 4 of 16 Co i er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov,net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N "A",TTRV, ROW, PUD,MPUD/DRI Naples RV Resort,Collier Regional,Johns Road and Hacienda Lakes MPUD $ "A", ROW,PUD Nurseries,Scattered Residential,Saba!Palm,Winding cypress PUD E "A",MPUD/DRI Scattered Residential,Hacienda Lakes MPUD/DRI W "A",PUD/DRI Scattered Residential, Nursery, Lely Resort PUD/DRI If the owner of the subject property owns contiguous property please provide a detailed legal description of the entire contiguous property on a separate sheet attached to the application. Section/Township/Range: Lot: Block: Subdivision: Plat Book: Page#: Property ID. Number: Metes&Bounds Description: ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/lndex.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: VeronaWalk HOA Mailing Address: 1044 Castello Drive, Suite 206 City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34103 Name of Homeowner Association: Lely County Club Property Owners Association Mailing Address: 181 Muirfield Circle City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34113 Name of Homeowner Association: Hacienda Lakes Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Physicians Regional-Collier Blvd. Mailing Address: 8300 Collier Blvd. City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34114 Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: 10/23/2013 Page 5 of 16 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.collieriov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 EVALUATION CRITERIA Pursuant to LDC subsections 10.02.13 B, 10,02.08 F and Chapter 3 G. of the Administrative Code, staff's analysis and recommendation to the Planning Commission, and the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners shall be based upon consideration of the applicable criteria. On a separate sheet attached to the application, provide a narrative statement describing the rezone request with specific reference to the criteria below. Include any backup materials and documentation in support of the request. See Attachment A PUD Amendments Considerations a. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land, surrounding areas, traffic and access, drainage, sewer, water, and other utilities. b. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements,contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. c. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the Growth Management Plan. (This is to include identifying what Sub-district, policy or other provision allows the requested uses/density, and fully explaining/addressing all criteria or conditions of that Sub-district, policy or other provision.) d. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. e. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. f. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities,both public and private. g. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. h. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case, based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. Deed Restrictions:The County is legally precluded from enforcing deed restrictions; however, many communities have adopted such restrictions.You may wish to contact the civic or property owners association in the area for which this use is being requested in order to ascertain whether or not the request is affected by existing deed restrictions. 10/23/2013 Page 6 of 16 Co. er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 Previous land use petitions on the subject property:To your knowledge, has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? If so,what was the nature of that hearing? No Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? —"Yes y/ No if so please provide copies. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS This land use petition requires a Neighborhood Information Meeting(NIM), pursuant to Chapter 3 E. of the Administrative Code and LDC section 10.03.06. Following the NIM, the applicant will submit a written summary and any commitments that have been made at the meeting. Refer to Chapter 8 B. of the Administrative Code for the NIM procedural requirements. • Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s)after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s)immediately. RECORDING OF DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS Within 30 days of adoption of the Ordinance, the owner or developer(specify name) at their expense shall record in the Public Records of Collier County a Memorandum of Understanding of Developer Commitments or Notice of Developer Commitments that contains the legal description of the property that is the subject of the land use petition and contains each and every commitment of the owner or developer specified in the Ordinance. The Memorandum or Notice shall be in form acceptable to the County and shall comply with the recording requirements of Chapter 695, FS.A recorded copy of the Memorandum or Notice shall be provided to the Collier County Planned Unit Development Monitoring staff within 15 days of recording of said Memorandum or Notice. LDC subsection 10.02.08 D This application will be considered "open" when the determination of "sufficiency" has been made and the application is assigned a petition processing number. The application will be considered "closed" when the petitioner withdraws the application through written notice or ceases to supply necessary information to continue processing or otherwise actively pursue the rezoning, amendment or change,for a period of 6 months. An application deemed "closed" will not receive further processing and an application "closed" through inactivity shall be deemed withdrawn. An application deemed "closed" may be re-opened by submission of a new application, repayment of all application fees and the grant of a determination of "sufficiency". Further review of the request will be subject to the then current code. 10/23/2013 Page 7 of 16 Co I er County COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergay.nett (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 STATEMENT OF UTILITY PROVISIONS FOR PUD REZONE REQUEST APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Watermen at Rockedge Naples, LLC Address: 265 Sevilla Avenue City: Coral Gables State: FL zip: 33134 Telephone: 239-872-0910 Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: smartin©watermengroup.corn Address of Subject Property(If available): 6925 Amity Road City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 33134 PROPERTY INFORMATION Section/Township/Range: 23 /50S/26E Lot: Block: Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: Plat Book: Page#: Property I.D. Number: TYPE OF SEWAGE DISPOSAL TO BE PROVIDED Check applicable system: a. County Utility System Fl b. City Utility System ❑ c. Franchised Utility System ❑ Provide Name: Collier County Utilities d. Package Treatment Plant ❑ (GPD Capacity): South System 267 units e. Septic System ❑ TYPE OF WATER SERVICE TO BE PROVIDED 1 Check applicable system: a. County Utility System b. City Utility System c. Franchised Utility System Provide Name: Collier County Utilities d. Private System (Well) ❑ Total Population to be Served: 500 Peak and Average Daily Demands: A. Water-Peak: 221,000 gpd Average Daily: $5,000 gpd B. Sewer Peak: 294,181 gpd Average Daily: 75,000 gpd If proposing to be connected to Collier County Regional Water System, please provide the date service is expected to be required: January 2017 10/23/2013 Page 8 of 16 CO er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 Narrative statement: Provide a brief and concise narrative statement and schematic drawing of sewage treatment process to be used as well as a specific statement regarding the method of affluent and sludge disposal. If percolation ponds are to be used, then percolation data and soil involved shall be provided from tests prepared and certified by a professional engineer. Potable water system for the project will consist of a looped water main connecting to an existing county water main in 951. A gravity sewer system and lift station will be constructed to serve the project,which will discharge into an existing county forcemain on 951.All sewage treatment will occur at Collier County's south plant. Collier County Utility Dedication Statement: If the project is located within the service boundaries of Collier County's utility service system, a notarized statement shall be provided agreeing to dedicate the water distribution and sewage collection facilities within the project area to the Collier County Utilities. This shall occur upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at that time. This statement shall also include an agreement that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. If applicable, the statement shall contain an agreement to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. See attached Utility Dedication Statement. Statement of Availability Capacity from other Providers: Unless waived or otherwise provided for at the pre-application meeting, if the project is to receive sewer or potable water services from any provider other than the County, a statement from that provider indicating adequate capacity to serve the project shall be provided. 10/23/2013 Page 9 of 16 COLLIER COUNTY UTILITY DEDICATION STATEMENT l,Eddy Garcia. Watermen at Rockedge Naples, LLC, being first duly sworn, depose and say that Watermen at Rockedge Naples, LLC agrees to dedicate to Collier County Utilities, the water distribution, and sewage collection facilities within the project area upon completion of the construction of these facilities in accordance with all applicable County ordinances in effect at the time. Additionally, Watermen at Rockedge Naples, LLC or successor developer, agree that the applicable system development charges and connection fees will be paid to the County Utilities Division prior to the issuance of building permits by the County. Finally, and if applicable, Watermen at Rockedge Naples, LLC or successor developer,agrees to dedicate the appropriate utility easements for serving the water and sewer systems. Waterme t , ock dge Naple ,LLC,Manager The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this V . day of , 2015,by e;.. ,. t + cLtr,0.. e e-- CHOOSE ONE OF THE FOLLOWING: ). who is personally known to me, _ who has produced as identification and did take an Oath did not take an Oath By: .£. .� -IL,- (Notary Public) MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: Gi 1 i-lAcAli ,��r�I n Notary Pudfo State of Florida Y �, Maria D Commission Garda sio ii, MY gom,r,ittl 2 Ff 026416 e Expires 00716!201T co I'or County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT ZBUU NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.collieraov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 FEE REQUIREMENTS ❑ PUD Rezone:$10,000.00* plus$25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone:$8,000.00* plus$25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD Amendment:$6,000.00* plus$25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ Comprehensive Planning Consistency Review:$2,250.00 ❑ Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC: $925.00 o BCC:$500.00 ❑ Environmental Data Review:$2,500.00 ❑ School Concurrency Fee, if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application,to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re-submittal will be accessed at 20%of the original fee. All checks may be made payable to:Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 10/23/2013 Page 11 of 16 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www,colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 I SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS CHECKLIST I See Chapter 3 G.1 of the Administrative Code for submittal requirements.This completed checklist is to be submitted with application packet in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS COPIES REQUIRED REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of why ® ❑ amendment is necessary Completed Application with required attachments '17 ® ❑ Pre-application meeting notes ® ❑ Notarized and completed Owner/Agent Affidavits' 2 ® ❑ Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 2 X° ❑ Addressing Checklist 2 ® ❑ Warranty Deed(s) 3 ir ❑ List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 2 Fe ❑ Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 4 ❑ Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 4 Aerial Photographs 5 i n Statement of Utility Provisions 4 C. ❑ Environmental Data Requirements 4 El 0 Traffic Impact Study 7 ❑ ❑ Historical Survey 4 _ School Impact Analysis Application,if applicable 2 ❑ Electronic copy of all required documents 2 ❑ ❑ Copies of detailed description of why amendment is necessary ❑ ❑ ❑ Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24"x 36"and One 81/2" x 11"copy 11 E ❑ Original PUD doc/ord and Master Plan 24"x 36"–ONLY IF AMENDING THE 17 IK ❑— PUD _ _Revised PUD application with changes crossed thru&underlined I EN Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 (l IN '"If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing,include an additional set of each submittal requirement If located in RFMU (Rural Fringe Mixed Use)Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A,2.a.2.(b.)i.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding"Wildfire Mitigation&Prevention Plan." The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: f.11 Exhibit C:Master Plan-See Chapter 3 E.1.of the Administrative Code Exhibit D:Legal Description ;1 Exhibit E:List of Requested Deviations from LDC Exhibit F:List of Development Commitments 10/23/2013 Page 12 of 16 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252- 6358 EXHIBIT A (To be completed in a separate document and attached to the application packet.) PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part,for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") by the process outlined in the LDC. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: CONDITIONAL USES(Optional) 1. DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Table below sets forth the development standards for land uses within the (type of PUD) PUD Residential Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the SDP or subdivision plat. 10/23/2013 Page 14 of 16 EXHIBIT B (To be completed in a separate document and attached to the application packet.) TABLE I RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS SINGLE TWO-FAMILY, CLUBHOUSE/ SINGLE FAMILY MULTI- DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PATIO& RECREATION FAMILY ATTACHED& FAMILY ZERO LOT LINE BUILDINGS . TOWNHOUSE PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA S.F.PER S.F.PER S.F.PER UNIT S.F.PER UNIT S.F.PER UNIT UNIT UNIT MINIMUM LOT WIDTH FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET MINIMUM FLOOR AREA S.F S.F S.F S.F./D.U. N/A MIN FRONT YARD FEET FEET FEET FEET N/A MIN SIDE YARD FEET FEET FEET FEET N/A MIN REAR YARD FEET FEET FEET FEET N/A MIN PRESERVE SETBACK FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET MIN,DISTANCE BETWEEN FEET or BH FEET FEET FEET BH, N/A STRUCTURES whichever is greater MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET EXCEED ACCESSORY STRUCTURES FRONT FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET SIDE FEET FEET FEET FEET BH REAR FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET . _ PRESERVE SETBACK FEET FEET FEET FEET FEET DISTANCE BETWEEN PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE MAX.BUILDING HEIGHT NOT TO SPS SPS SPS or FEET FEET EXCEED S.P.S.=Same as Principal Structures BH=Building Height Footnotes as needed 10/23/2013 Page 15 of 16 GENERAL: Except as provided for herein,all criteria set forth below shall be understood to be in relation to individual parcel or lot boundary lines, or between structures. Condominium, and/or homeowners' association boundaries shall not be utilized for determining development standards. Setback may be either feet ( ) on one side or feet ( ) on the other side in order to provide a minimum separation between principal structures of feet ( ). Alternatively, if the foot ( ) setback option is not utilized, then the minimum setback shall not be less than feet ( ) and the combined setback between principal structures shall be at least feet (_ ). At the time of the application for subdivision plat approval for each tract, a lot layout depicting minimum yard setbacks and the building footprint shall be submitted. TABLE II DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR COMMERCIAL DISTRICT PRINCIPAL USES ACCESSORY USES MINIMUM LOT AREA Sq.Ft. N/A MINIMUM LOT WIDTH Ft. N/A MINIMUM YARDS(External) From Immokalee Road Canal ROW Ft. SPS From Future Extension of Collier Blvd. Ft. SPS From Western Project Boundary Ft. Ft. MINIMUM YARDS(Internal) Internal Drives/ROW Ft. Ft. Rear Ft. Ft. Side Ft. Ft. MIN.DISTANCE BETWEEN Ft or sum of Ft. STRUCTURES Building heights* MAXIMUM HEIGHT Retail Buildings Ft. Ft. Office Buildings Ft. Ft. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA Sq.Ft.** N/A MAX.GROSS LEASABLE AREA Sq.Ft. N/A * whichever is greater ** per principal structure,on the finished first floor. 10/23/2013 Page 16 of 16 ATTACHMENT A PUD Amendment Considerations(LDC Section 10.02.13.B) 1. The suitability of the area for the type and pattern of development proposed in relation to physical characteristics of the land,surrounding areas,traffic and access, drainage,sewer,water,and other utilities. The Rockedge RPUD is an existing PUD that was previously deemed suitable for the area based upon the criteria outlined above. Moreover,the revised RPUD is significantly reducing allowed density which will lighten the demand on public infrastructure such as roadways,water, sewer and other utilities. Since its approval in 2006, a significant amount of development has occurred along the C.R. 951 corridor. The property is surrounded by existing and approved residential developments including Hacienda Lakes, Winding Cypress, Lely Resort. The proposed development at Rockedge will be similar in character and quality as those communities. The project will provide buffering from adjoining properties and development standards to ensure compatibility. The project will be served by County sewer and water services as well as other utility providers, which already have established infrastructure in the abutting roadway corridors. 2. Adequacy of evidence of unified control and suitability of any proposed agreements, contract, or other instruments, or for amendments in those proposed, particularly as they may relate to arrangements or provisions to be made for the continuing operation and maintenance of such areas and facilities that are not to be provided or maintained at public expense. Findings and recommendations of this type shall be made only after consultation with the county attorney. Watermen at Rockedge Naples LLC, is the owner or contract purchaser for parcels which comprise the revised Rockedge RPUD (see attached ownership map). The Applicant has demonstrated unified control through the signed Covenant of Unified Control and various affidavits provided by the contract sellers. Operation and maintenance responsibility for private areas and facilities shall be assigned to the developer until conveyance to a property owners association. Further,the proposed RPUD documents make appropriate provisions for the continued operation and maintenance of common areas. 3. Conformity of the proposed PUD with the goals, objectives and policies of the growth management plan. The proposed residential development allows single family and multifamily residential uses, ancillary recreational uses, water management lakes, preserves, open space and internal roadways with sidewalks. The proposed project is designed in compliance with the goals, objectives and policies set forth in the Collier County Growth Management Plan(GMP)as follows. 1. The subject property is located within the Urban Mixed Use District — Urban Residential Fringe (URF) Sub-district on the Future Land Use Map of the Collier County Growth Management Plan. According to the Growth Management Plan (GMP), the purpose of this district is to provide transitional densities between the Urban and the Agricultural/Rural Area. The Subdistrict permits a base density of 1.5 residential units per gross acre,plus up to 1 unit per acre via the transfer of development rights. Additional density can be request though and affordable housing density bonus. The RPUD is requesting a maximum density of 2.5 units per acre in accordance with the URF Subdistrict. 2. The subject property's location in relation to existing or proposed community facilities and services constitutes an appropriate area for the development of residential land uses as intended in Objective 3 and Policy 5.5 of the Future Land Use Element (FLUE). The presence of schools, public facilities, medical facilities, office uses, and emergency services within a three-mile radius of the site, as well as water and wastewater treatment services, demonstrate that proposed residential development will be appropriately served. 3. This proposed development addresses GMP objectives including Future Land Use Element (FLUE) Policies 5.3, 5.5, 5.6, and 5.7 in that the site is located in an Urban Designated Area with available urban services and existing infrastructure, and it is a Planned Unit Development project that clusters residential development in an area specifically designated to provide transitional densities between urban and rural areas. 4. The Rockedge RPUD implements Policy 5.6 of the FLUE in that a minimum of 60% of the project will be open space and a minimum of 25% of the project's existing native vegetation will be preserved on-site. 5. As set forth in Objective #3 of the FLUE, all improvements for the Rockedge RPUD are planned to be compliant with land development regulations where applicable and as set forth in our PUD development standards and deviations. 6. The proposed residential development is compatible and complementary to existing and future surrounding land uses as required in Policy 5.4 of the FLUE through the proposed uses, internal arrangement of structures, the placement of land use buffers,and the proposed development standards contained herein. The proposed residential project will be consistent and compatible with existing and approved residential, agricultural, and institutional uses nearby. The proposed development standards are consistent with those found in the Winding Cypress, Hacienda Lakes and Lely Resort PUDs. Similar to those projects, Rockedge will have a unified architectural theme and landscaping, common open space, a recreational amenity area, and restricted access for the residents and their guests. 15' Type B buffers will be provided where the project abuts single family uses; 10' Type A buffers where adjacent to nursery uses, and 20' Type D where it abuts public right of way. 7. The proposed development is consistent with Objective 7 of Future Land Use Element of the GMP and Policies regarding Smart Growth, in that it provides an internal network of sidewalks and provides access to the County's existing and planned pathway system via Sabal Palm Road and a restricted access bike/ped connection along its CR 951 boundary. Moreover,the proposed development will be consistent with Policy 7.4 by developing a walkable community with common open space and community amenities. Due to the size and location of this community, and the gated nature of this a butting projects, providing vehicular interconnection with adjacent properties is not practical, it is not consistent with this type of residential development and nor do we believe that it would be a welcomed proposition for the abutting property owners. As described above the County's existing and planned pathways system provides adequate access to those properties. 4. The internal and external compatibility of proposed uses, which conditions may include restrictions on location of improvements, restrictions on design, and buffering and screening requirements. This project was previously deemed compatible internally and externally. The proposed development will continue to be compatible and the proposed reduction in density should make it more consistent with other residential and mixed use projects in the area. By virtue of the proposed uses, unified architectural theme, development standards, open space and preserves, this residential community is compatible with the surrounding area, especially when considering the separation from other residential uses created by two roadways. The Rockedge RPUD will be screened along property lines with buffers and preserves to ensure compatibility between proposed and existing or potential surrounding uses. 5. The adequacy of usable open space areas in existence and as proposed to serve the development. The proposed development will meet open space requirements of the Collier County LDC. Usable open space in the form of a recreational area, common areas, pedestrian walkways, lakes and a preserve will provide over 64 acres acres of open space on the site. 6. The timing or sequence of development for the purpose of assuring the adequacy of available improvements and facilities, both public and private. Public and private improvements and facilities are available for the site. Water and sewer service is available. Roadway capacity is available. Drainage is adequate for the site. Waste management, cable, electric, and telephone service are available. Adequate schools, police, fire, bus, park, and health care facilities are within the proposed development's service area. Payment of impact fees and timing of adequate public facilities certification are mechanisms to assure the development is appropriately • serviced. 7. The ability of the subject property and of surrounding areas to accommodate expansion. As explained in responses #3 and #6, the subject property and general area are appropriate for the proposed development. The proposed residential community is an ideal infill project that is compatible with surrounding uses and makes sense for the general area and the specific property. The property is served by adequate public facilities and will provide a quality residential project along CR 951. 8. Conformity with PUD regulations, or as to desirable modifications of such regulations in the particular case,based on determination that such modifications of justified as meeting public purposes to a degree at least equivalent to literal application of such regulations. The proposed development conforms with the intent of the PUD regulations by establishing development regulations that are consistent with similar residential developments throughout Collier County and the requested deviations provide design flexibility that will help improve the overall project while not causing any adverse impact the public health, safety and welfare. • • Co County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliereov.net (239)252-2400 rAppl�eat n Meeting Notes, }� {( Assigned Planner: 4ii° Engineering Manager(for PPL's and FP's): t//r t!ro or��fib C , i It..,,. .. aia. . ,.}u,cf,•. ..,9. .i... � .n,. F..xP'.i.+,c.�UlJ.L G,! ...;g s sd.,.,. t.�,.-.., .,,,. ..,,..., Project Name: r...LY°r j f f) PL#: Zc!4. Z - Property ID#: Current Zoning: AIN*-' Project Address: City: State: Zip: Applicant: g.ktr Agent Name: Phone: Agent/Firm Address: City: State: Zip: • Property Owner: Please provide the following,if applicable: / i. Total Acreage: ' Ci ii. Proposed#of Residential Units: aP .e ill. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments,Indicate the original petition number:_ f2 • Z; A LYv.3 I v. If there Is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please Indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Attachment F 9rcouY COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colllergov.net (239)252-2400 rte. - *. PR I- IS Srre. pt..,ou Fme AccesS d. Lopmet rt lvy�.*s f Lc A4 n fKi 14,A.A. ,10 •4v'tss flog )°OI,G 3:'(' S. ? MPPc+cG.1.G� roc c.teS i Divu•1 c&&t$thr cu.4Gutt.-Ytcouc, ex .L it u Prof. 4k..k.".4.A4t.e.,4.F w41&.) Pub ( : ec)- r4- r 4-e, 1,2I. 5:c.. t.os . o r D. �f (g) D,c 1 r>1-I.- ACC efro Ffr,*, t)i1( Po#44/ .ti0-,' S I/1/ Fe-C4 IoN S0 9 v #16 P kid 19C&ii 4 . /y[J /�y IA etvg/,; CA[ a Ql/-rkoirs fog 1✓I I4fliNGif � �rl. go A64 l 2 > , Iti doshiso t^.Avvoy`i!/e4 C Co,siAl 1 1.4,1 ) f 5 6t 4toti a A" h!/O 0064* T eel" - T(S 40 S u "Vet P4tA- assAuczeto get ,rr e--, . lik . ) +4cces/5 po t arS cs�► tt4s-r e_ l try p�� CO i ,�4N Avv e t t3 "1 "P1)D a er CaixtY COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colllergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 q � tt irlg,Iand Final,'Submittal Requirement Checklist fore Pre ` tlbr a tY PUD`Re ne-'Ch 3 G 1.oftbe Admi istrative code ,, rr AmendrlAgi nt to PU( Ch 36,2 . . . , Q�xff h lii dmiin isttrati i Code , � .. ',-w,.:,=:;. QUO to PY RPzpne7k . e tnr,.te br The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre-Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS #OF REQUIRED W I. __. COPIES REQUIRED Cover Letter with Narrative Statement including a detailed description of © ❑ why amendment is necessary Completed Application with required attachments to • Pre-application meeting notes m Afficdiyit of Authorization,signed and notarized 2 17 Notarized and completed Covenant of Unified Control 2 Completed Addressing Checklist 2 11 Warranty Deed(s) 3 1 List Identifying Owner and all parties of corporation 2 _4 Signed and sealed Boundary Survey 4 Architectural Rendering of proposed structures 4 • Current Aerial Photographs(available from Property Appraiser)with ❑ project boundary and,if vegetated,FLUCFCS Codes with legend included 5 ti on aerial. Statement of Utility Provisions 4 • Environmental Data Requirements pursuant to LDC section 3.08.00 4 0 Environmental Data Requirements collated into a single Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)packet at time of public hearings.Coordinate with ® ❑ project planner at time of public hearings. Listed or Protected Species s rvey,less an 12 months old. Include 4 ❑moye copies of previous surveys.(A'S/',J 4 0A: rive. ) :11: 1 Traffic Impact Study 7 Historical Survey 4 School Impact Analysis Application,if applicable 2 Electronic copy of all required documents 2 Completed Exhibits A-F(see below for additional Information)+ ® a List of requested deviations from the LDC with justification for each(this ® • ❑ document is separate from Exhibit E) Revised Conceptual Master Site Plan 24"x 36"and One 8 h" x ii"copy 7 ❑ Original PUD document/ordinance,and Master Plan 24"x 36"—Only if -l1 ❑ Amending the PUD Checklist continued onto next page... • 9/11/2014 Page 11 of 15 $g9ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252.6358 t Ell 13.0 TRIn.• NAnQ Revised PUD document with changes crossed thru&underlined Copy of Official Interpretation and/or Zoning Verification 1 R 1 i *if located in immokalee or seeking affordable housing,include an additional set of each submittal requirement The following exhibits are to be completed on a separate document and attached to the application packet: AExhibit C:Master Plan-See Chapter 3 E.1.of the Administrative Code Exhibit 0:Legal Description Exhibit E:List of Requested LDC Deviations and Justification for each Exhibit F:List of Development Commitments if located in RFMU(Rural Fringe Mixed Use)Receiving Land Areas Pursuant to LDC subsection 2.03.08.A.2.a.2.(b.)I.c., the applicant must contact the Florida Forest Service at 239-690-3500 for information regarding"Wildfire Mitigation&Prevention Plan." PLANNERS—INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: 1124 I School District(Residential Components):Amy Conservancy of SWFL:Nichole Ryan Lockheart 11 Utilities Engineering:Kris Vanlengen IP!, Parks and Recreation:Vicky Ahmad 01, Emergency Management:Dan Summers • Immokalee Water/Sewer District: • City of Naples:Robin Singer,Planning Director • Other: -.'f ..Aai', )x.... a }',40 0 t, t tea.R 8µy` * 11, 1<rj„f Pre-Application Meeting:$500.00 ❑ PUD Rezone:$10,000.00*plus$25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ PUD to PUD Rezone:$8,000.00* plus$25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre 1 PU Amendment:$6,000.00* plus$25.00 an acre or fraction of an acre ❑ mprehenslve Planning Consistency Review:$2,250.00 Environmental Data Requirements-EIS Packet(submittal determined at pre-application meeting):$2,500.00 ❑ Listed or Protected Species Review(when an EIS Is not required):$1,000.00 ;87 Legal Advertising Fees: o CCPC:$925.00 o BCC:$500.00 ❑ School Concurrency Fee,if applicable: o Mitigation Fees, if application,to be determined by the School District in coordination with the County *Additional fee for the 5th and subsequent re-submittal will be accessed at 20%of the original fee. All checks may be made payable to:Board of County Commissioners 9/11/2014 Page 12 of 15 ■ f y� p� �y p 'r CSA I �' i f,':., } f'f F t r 1 'r t � t Y 1'R p � e4 turi7� n� ra U jt7t r7 ' f i f 1 f s j ,� i' 4 ,{)�tl t I�t } v, t 7 :� ,} t ;'r 7i *.t -d, v A➢.1, .1 / tb'�'._•Z.. 7"Altf 7� II L ;ii �)1..,1,W ,�. ?S ye v,,.F:n:f.,.. i.0 }�.h.., L... . e 'T �J y 1 Collier County Contact information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony @coiliergov.net ❑ Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque @colliergov.net ❑ Alison Bradford,P.E. Engineering Services 252-6820 alisonbradford @colliergov.net ❑ Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5165 markburtchin @cotliergov.net ❑ George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543 georgecascio @coiliergov.net O Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst.County Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton @colliergov.net ❑ Kay Deselem,AICP _ Zoning Services 252-2931 kaydeselem @colliergov.net ❑ Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman @colliergov.net ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michaeigibbons @colliergov.net ❑ Nancy Gundlach,AICP,PLA ZoningServices 252-2484 nancygundlach @colliergov.net ❑ John Houidsworth Engineering Services 252-5757 johnhouldsworth @coiliergov.net ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendali @colilergov.net ❑� eed Jarvi,P.E. _ Transportation Planning 252-5849 reedjarvi @colliergov.net L� Stephen Lenberger Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger @colliergov.net O Paulo Martins - Utilities 252-4285 paulomartins @colliergov.net ❑ Jack McKenna,P.E. Engineering Services _ 252-2911 jackmckenna @coliiergov.net O Matt McLean,P.E. Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmciean @colliergov.net ❑ Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility impact Fees 252-4215 gitbertmoncivaiz @colilergov.net g Michele Mosca,AICP Comprehensive Planning , 252-2466 michelemosca @coiilergov.net ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam @coiliergov.net ❑ Mariam Ocheltree Graphics 252-2315 mariamocheitree @colliergov.net O Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 _brandyotero @coliiergov.net O John Podczerwinsky Transportation Planning 252-5890 johnpodczerwinsky @colliergov.net ❑ Brandl Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipollard @colliergov.net _ O Fred Reischl,AICP Zoning Services 252-4211 fredreischl @colliergov.net XStacy Revay Transportation Pathways 252-5677 stacyrevay@coiliergov.net ❑ Brett Rosenblum,P.E. Utility Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenbium@colliergov.net EA Michael Sawyer Zoning Services 252-2926 michaelsawyer @colliergov.net O Corby Schmidt,AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt @colliergov.net O Chris Scott Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott @colliergov.net ❑ Daniel Smith,AICP Landscape Review 252-4312 danieismith @colliergov.net ❑ Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-8400 scottstone@coliiergov.net O Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain @colliergov.net ❑ Carolina Valera Comprehensive Planning 252-8498 carolinavalera @colilergov.net ❑ Kris VanLengen Utility Planning 252-5366 krisvaniengen @colliergov.net O Jon Walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonathonwaish@colliergov.net ❑ David Weeks,AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks @colliergov.net ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Planning and Zoning , 252-5518 kirstenwilkie @colliergov.net Name Representing Phone Email ` aw M4 r+b ek10 Cottrell_ Ga FIX. itewecJ Zs2-73grflans,Ms►IDa i 1b& er Se(Ad MUT(N 141T4eME•vAE7/G lib 872-09 10 S 1,1,irri I Ake Irk 1,,inFlo tiabro4P.co►►, 'tie. IVa. ,a c s e_ RLc A- 619-47r sco Ve visa -,j+.m,&vs ,,,t �Jr�vJ'►� C-f K 4133-5131 (-.�p.1ii�� I•��„a cyidd:•.aTr•n•rv0,,� 5740 AGsi gaud (,thee-6 Div, 41/►cc+ L52-Zzt! I7L914e4,10.4f o/�reryv, our t- /64411 T laves Avid&lowerSA/ 332211 rvnhleg osed6apfie.mote►�, Ga+►> Pll i/tn n Jimenez- S©c�rN Ievp-ip 1 t.%? Q MAW: .L63V€1! fJzmeAte (?Srwind Joy, ae CO(10/CA-eN*4 • IIIIM #4 %H A-0 a/a-t A-rr,G. 93-e/dl 74‘</gmer#1/-.trfo.Sv comt, Gnz►i 31',/f4 Pk" .646NO S o,ljzr-RwA,to<N 1 ' • Co r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit In person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be atoned by Addresslna personnel prior to ore- application meelina.please allow 3 days for=ceasing. Not all items win apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months win require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department ! I PETITION TYPE(indicate type below,complete a separate Addressing Checidist for each Petition type) 0 BL(Blasting Permit) SDP(Site Development Plan) BD(Boat Dock Extension) SDPA(SDP Amendment) ❑ Camlval/Clrcus Permit ❑ SDPI(Insubstantial Change to SDP) RCU(Conditional Use) ❑ SIP(Site improvement Plan) EXP(Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI(Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP(Final Plat ❑ SNR(Street Name Change) ❑ LEA(Lot Line Adjustment) 0 SNC(Street Name Change—Unplatted) PNC(Project Name Change) TDR(Transfer of Development Rights) PPL(Plans&Plat Review) ❑ VA(Variance) PSP(Preliminary Subdivision Plat) VRP(Vegetation Removal Permit) PUD Rezone VRSFP(Vegetation Removal&Site Fill Permit) RZ(Standard Rezone) OTHER PUDA I LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties(copy of lengthy description may be attached) See attached. 7-56 ,< 2‘ .t? FOLIO(Property ID)NUMBER(s)of above(attach to,or associate with,legal description if more than one) See attached. STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES(es applicable,if already assigned) Corner of NE Sabel Palm and Collier Blvd. • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/slte In relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY(copy -needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME("applicable) Rockedge PROPOSED STREET NAMES(if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER(for existing projects/sites only) SDP or AR or PL# PUD 0o7-A-499I • Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DMSIONI NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)262.5724 WWW.COLUERGOV.NET, Project or development names proposed for,or already appearing In,condominium documents(if application; Indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Check One: ® Checklist is to be Faxed back ❑ Personally Picked Up APPLICANT NAME: Michelle Gomez PHONE 239-597-0575 FAX 239-597-0578 Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY FLN Number(Primary) Ste e ei Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: t. Date: /D`/3-1 r1 Updated by: Dab: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED • Rockedge Folios 00433040006•' 00433120007/ 00433160009✓ 00433480006✓ 00433720009✓ 00433800000 00433680004✓ 00434840001 ✓ 00435400000/ 00436360000✓ 00438440001 0043652000N/ 00438600003✓ 00436760008✓ 00436800104/ 00436800201✓ 00436800308✓ II• • r; c;lw7, 1 I I'' 1# i +.1.46. t t;:' 1 ti i r 4 q 44# ...0. 41P'4.. ''' ,3 4 . ,01.:40,,V.1 ,I t' -,,,fri-, L; • I: A,,,, EXHIBIT F pu/A m '. ROCKEDGE RPUD i�= a •ri..nt w.w�.GENERAL LOCATION MAP N u 1 25 x,6ao s,000 Foy •Ciril lityinerams•grin+IMF MI MN Pak 7MpIwtioim000so.ou4 ttode a RY0100n.WOS1EW*I F Omni Lumen Memd i • LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES PHASE ONE,RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55,PAGE 2 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA; THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 664.25 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23,TO A PLATTED CORNER OF TRACT "Fl"AS SHOWN ON SAID ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES PLAT; THENCE S01°14'38"W FOR.675.75 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT"F1'; THENCE LEAVING SAID PLAT,S0I°14'14"W FOR 675.73 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF(1/2)OF THE EAST HALF(1/2)OF THE WEST HALF (1/2)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°42'08"W FOR 662.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23 S01°09'56"W FOR 617.91 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(114) N89°34'54"W FOR 300.19 FEET; THENCE S01°09'09"W FOR 435.95 FEET; THENCE N89°34'09"W FOR 150.16 FEET; THENCE N89°38'05"W FOR 224.81 FEET; THENCE S01°08'27"W FOR 260.13 FEET,TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SABAL PALM ROAD(60'WIDE),ALSO BEING A 30.00 FOOT OFFSET OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SABLE PALM ROAD,N89°3728"W FOR 645.99 FEET,TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF(1/2)OF THE SOUTH HALF(1/2)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4); THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF(1/2)OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4) N01°0 l'07"E FOR 302.01 FEET,TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°47'35"E FOR 30.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE LEAVING SAID FRACTION LINE,N01°01'01"E FOR 218.98 FEET; THENCE N52°35'40"E FOR 646.23 FEET; 1 THENCE N40°29'08"W FOR 30.05 FEET; THENCE N49°40'54"E FOR 22.10 FEET; THENCE N36°22'l5"E FOR 436.44 FEET,TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE EAST HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°42'08"W FOR 785.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF(I/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°01'01"E FOR 332.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°32'04"W FOR 994.18 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER.(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S0O°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°42'08"E FOR 331.15 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°5629"W FOR 660.13 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE N89°57'42"W FOR 330.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(I/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER 91/4)OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE N89°47'35"W FOR 230.44 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF A 100 FOOT WIDE CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP,SECTION 03510-2602; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY N00°51153"E FOR 1642.03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF(1/2)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°22101"E FOR 894.88 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N00°58'45"E FOR 662.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 996.40 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S01°05'30"W FOR 328.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH 328.19 FEET OF THE EAST HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°01'53"E FOR 663.85 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH 328.19 FEET OF THE EAST HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°10'38"E FOR 328.19 FEET,TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED. CONTAINING 4646476.23 SQUARE FEET OR 106.67 ACRES,MORE OR LESS. MICHAEL A.WARD,PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR,CERTIFICATE NO.LS#5301. { , SIGNING DATE NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252-2400 FAX (239)252-5724 WW1fy.COLLIERGOV.NET ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel prior to pre- application meeting.please allow 3 days for processing. Not all Items wilt apply to every project. Items in bold type are required, FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE(Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL(Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP(Site Development Plan) ❑ BD(Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA(SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI(Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU(Conditional Use) ❑ SIP(Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP(Excavation Permit) El SIPI(Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP(Final Plat ❑ SNR(Street Name Change) ❑ LLA(Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC(Street Name Change—Unplatted) ❑ PNC(Project Name Change) ❑ TDR(Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL(Plans&Plat Review) ❑ VA(Variance) ❑ PSP(Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP(Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP(Vegetation Removal&Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ(Standard Rezone) NO OTHER PUPA LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties(copy of lengthy description maybe attached) See attached. -5a 24 5.23 FOLIO(Property ID)NUMBER(s)of above(attach to, or associate with,legal description if more than one) See attached. STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES(as applicable, if already assigned) Corner of NE Sabal Palm and Collier Blvd. • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY(copy -needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME(if applicable) Rockedge PROPOSED STREET NAMES(if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER(for existing projects/sites only) SDP or AR or PL# '11) 41007-AX-4991 Attachment G • Q&et COMO, COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION! NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239)252.2400 FAX (239)252.5124 WWW,COLLIERGOV,NET Project or development names proposed for,or already appearing in,condominium documents(if application; Indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Check One: Ej Checklist is to be Faxed back 0 Personally Picked Up APPLICANT NAME: Michelle Gomez PHONE 239-597-0575 FAX 239-597-0578 Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY FLN Number(Primary) Se C ek.flok.dttif Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by://14.2d--./ — Date: /15.13-71 Updated by: Date: IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Rockedge Folios 00433040006 00433120007 00433160009/ 00433480006, 00433720009✓ 00433800000 f 00433880004 r 00434840001 00435400000 00436360000 ' 00436440001 0043652000 ` 00436600003 V 00436760008✓ 00436800104" 00436800201 of 00436800308 V ' -it i ' --1:1 '-. i ...k,„,.,, ._ i ', ihr E ,i • :., } r t' `mot JJ s "fix. .E .s.' a A •S� LE&NAK H t °..EK+RD_ �� a` ( SUBJECT PROPERTTY 4''''''';'''' , e.,„,,,�� dq A� i '.C s , � i y A 3 2 k '1,.:.,.:€ ,�i z ,. _ yd " x 44 iq,_Y 1'�'sti3 ., '0,,,4*.::: ■ b �} - . ,.,„i, il', Alai 11 0 ' 3 $fin.,. a W .-1�� EXHIBIT F N 0 1,254 2,504 5,400 Feet caaysua r Nca f20GKEDGE RPUD IIL w r r� 1..c,an'•viFUtlablkl(Un GENERAL LOCATION MAP .civil rnpanirrinp•Stmcgmg x M assn Pelh:T.1PIGjeaa�12012112fl630,00.04 tiaakedga RP Jb Comp Ewhibl{s�EzMMI F Generoa locglon Mcpmd LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA,AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES PHASE ONE, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55,PAGE 2 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA; THENCE N89°01`58"E FOR 664.25 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23,TO A PLATTED CORNER OF TRACT "F I"AS SHOWN ON SAID ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES PLAT; THENCE S01°14'38"W FOR 675.75 FEET ALONG THE WESTERLY BOUNDARY OF SAID TRACT"Fl"; THENCE LEAVING SAID PLAT,S01°14'14"W FOR 675.73 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF(1/2)OF THE EAST HALF(1/2)OF THE WEST HALF (1/2)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°42'08"W FOR 662.30 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23 S01°09'56"W FOR 617.91 FEET; THENCE LEAVING SAID EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4) N89°34`54"W FOR 300.19 FEET; THENCE S01°09'09"W FOR 435.95 FEET; THENCE N89°34'09"W FOR 150.16 FEET; THENCE N89°38'05"W FOR 224.81 FEET; THENCE S01°08'27"W FOR 260.13 FEET,TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SABAL PALM ROAD(60'WIDE),ALSO BEING A 30.00 FOOT OFFSET OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID SABLE PALM ROAD,N89°37'28"W FOR 645.99 FEET,TO A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF(1/2)OF THE SOUTH HALF(1/2)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4); THENCE ALONG SAID WEST LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF(1/2)OF THE SOUTH HALF (1/2)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4) N01°01'07"E FOR 302.01 FEET,TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°47'35"E FOR 30.00 FEET ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE LEAVING SAID FRACTION LINE,N01°01'01"E FOR 21 8.98 FEET; THENCE N52°35'40"E FOR 646.23 FEET; THENCE N40°29'08"W FOR 30.05 FEET; THENCE N49°40'54"E FOR 22.10 FEET; THENCE N36°22'15"E FOR 436.44 FEET,TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE EAST HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°42'08"W FOR 785.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE WEST HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°01'01"E FOR 332.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°32'04"W FOR 994.18 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°42'08"E FOR 331.15 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°56'29"W FOR 660.13 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE N89°57'42"W FOR 330.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER 91/4)OF SAID SECTION 13; THENCE N89°47'35"W FOR 230.44 FEET TO A POINT ON THE EAST LINE OF A 100 FOOT WIDE CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY AS SHOWN ON FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP,SECTION 03510-2602; THENCE ALONG SAID EAST LINE OF CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY N00°51'53"E FOR 1642.03 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTH HALF(1/2)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°22'01"E FOR 894.88 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N00°58'45"E FOR 662.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 996.40 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE WEST HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S01°05'30"W FOR 328.19 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTH 328.19 FEET OF THE EAST HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°01'53"E FOR 663.85 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTH 328.19 FEET OF THE EAST HALF(1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°10138"E FOR.328.19 FEET,TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE PARCEL HEREIN DESCRIBED. CONTAINING 4646476.23 SQUARE FEET OR 106.67 ACRES,MORE OR LESS. MICHAEL A. WARD,PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR,CERTIFICATE NO.LS#5301. SIGNING DATE NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER. 1 el4 3 f a1A ..°e ? 1 2 l �i1 f 1 k a i 2b g `2 111,111.1.1 01 3 1 ! ff t ! 1 ! 2i 1 ab + 111 � � 3 r.rar¢i Y Y X"e Yg Y"q p Y C e C ' !1 C. F aP �` ei¢d is n . nE e¢Nee.lala_b - a! D$ a 1 a { 1 1t ate 1 1 1..4 $ 511!111-1 ii / s laet9 l: a 1111 .i i2 a-w;3sli??i., I/sea% s Id 3 3 111` it w°1[e}]@p_ [!:y S¢[i i a ay p` 1Y 1 w @_ !t i _bfbtbibsb=bt; D 3ab a c i a1 E p s!s' e t _. a1 . € i i. �1ii1e` 13.11113iFIE�_11s' s11 11:� ° as:to gr g [ a Y _4.W TA. Fj {Ill` i o 5.: 1 .1 e w Ber/irk, -. 1 i ; qa ai,;.i-:-,gik1_Il^mk Epti ;4 - : __ 1r.4E E�'9!5..0115 nlnoae.-�J..Q- .. S o c`�2 '- 2 gad 8 g 11 3 451 Rb10 1 2 6 e 3 I1[ a 1111111114141stlpg11 favdi ;111y i ° :82rcX°°d I a 34 11:131:11!;:i.4Y . , 1111 5ii 10 413 i€ I I ; i Q a a¢1a0!1ei1 w`i E'� I rq g R E sp; bi 1 E6k 11e14g r 3 3 : s'1r1rEr1r9` Yl1ee 1111 111 Y 1 Si e ¢ si i b 1 11 .1 i 11 2 / X Y a,._,a n i i a ilalrl eadl.f 11w � 1 e p [ 3!e 1 p :3 e.p. : t 1 Ij Y Y ; 1 b 11 1 i' f p ! • 1 �1 a 514119111111114 �FX 31.1[2 t° �5I le E�f• E ] 1 F' di 1- rg y ¢ a i - ! 3- P ¢§;Q 3113 �1 "'�� s 1q� !1 �i1Ek1. e e g� 31 ! i !e d Sti� 3 ii eY Y 0 °113- Y Y+i+�YQQ Y4 f Xp 1. Y Y=Y,I y 11 7 - 11 1 „ i i d :b1 a ell w1l Al Iblkwlelei4 2 . elassl A1Qiwtb?Iyl e 3 �- i. mile ' 4 11 a $tt gi i20 I y a a`agat-i.tl 1;10411/0 1 i pZ Ell Pt i"I a 1 1 gg 1g q: .1.111 5�ei x iti...,1 a 1 1114 $ 0 0 Y' !i1 1, . 1-1 ! 9 •e al :"0 6-.- 3 1 @F @Q;11.4 31415151 i"g ly t' i-e i .. s E. 1E 1. 25 1y s r-Y(; -"531°4 9'x'a°AE€4e E r'Y X X XX it l r:3 3 1 1 y 11 i1 3' t'i i ; i 14 l 3aa 171t7“-"-I-AS1w ;.2%' a3 a;Pblbeasb"_alae eb�Islt- :El 1 . ¢ g to i g i y i 4 5 ° Iii D g rgeQA EsSEIEI Ellln:r rs_^..{=;;r�r<��r_r 1 I! i 17 y�� ! @ t y X11 151'*. nn2-4rr•ri r� gin?-x'D-ir 'a?-9.:°x!X1 'Yj b€ 1�b 8*° iii 221 f a! 1 1 43 411 a el`_rlsi3iaYs4Ai1ire1!5.XEix'EYI6gmliAilia 1141114",1Yl11bi 1Ei 1 A i 141 4 e. i 1 i # a Ili! tl3 Z as 1 e. .i E @ E a k a p- o fi.s tl 1 i 1. ,1 r 4+11 It 114 1 .5 llrxr_iLi- i' .g,. . Pb11Wiri 41111 !11tillitifbIll i 11 1-I Ett!1c pt g ! .1 x w j €Yi!e- iYl ! R 611 3 `. 4 l p i#�X o N 1 i fiewi i1.f11a I PO.;ei 6 inn 4X1 g a L -. a g t ill l 1 11 s ab - 1{d • !vat y1 z g i 1 1;1p 1-.E3 ! 1 5 bail !p !]E 5 'ic t z o °, 1i1141 11_1.it,i 1411 1: 1!1 .`31 < m R- °" g - g9 g:b qg 7Y ! ,{e !Y •If l aY pi {Y is Y I` Ii 't i2 i_ 311= i; f 1� 1 a e ��C lla 3 lit '1fe 1a•41 1! ■ai ei;l. 0 1i. 11 111 ell a/1 11.1 PI I'1 ill!!F Iii 1;1111 i/i 1°1 1111 1/1 iii 't la! qa!i rran 1x. e e Rl 0 .1 .1 1i'a 11 lip 3liY i 1Yi 1� bb! d E Ydi + 1�i 1 111 Zia i @���Y�� ¢�"� Ili! ',.; .R �%a 135= ? E! .r..a x11 Y.; 1 11; 1.:e Y1 11 iii $ !Ili 11 it 'Y 11c 1 ! .�. iEt 1;1 111115i 111 gi 161 i°1 1g 141 1,`i1 €11,1. 1111 f 1 @ ea aa .1i ill 4/i 1^11*l 3 D1e114 115 1111 ii ill! 11 y.1pl 1 iY e3 E {{ 1 =g !ill ,-,11 91 1 :E 1t pi. a YLn'� i:ii y¢e 1Y .3 @- it 31.4 .Y i1 61 -ji,11 'e< 3 f 1 FOUR r � � El 1�1!!!, i !E�0fi �S(r a# 7 =¢11 jjixQ R I [.wa a Fa° e! 1e 1.e 4! i€e3 #v., ,, I h �1�ii1 bii:ii,q 11,1il 1 11eg;<fi! 1=11 p-1 €=-a1i,i1a x=� �" I Ti €111.4 ! 4 P 1! 1 lii 1i t E119 el' lyi{i II 141 i1` iA n - . gg{ 1 1 °k33�E[E 3 ip 'i Y 1! @•Ypa j gi.i li s1 Ix,.1'1 3-411 gi1'4lilil it1i 'II 411 ?1 ;1 '41%1 1112 • vii i ..�...- _A - • dig 1E- 1. 1 1"1411 1 i !;01 e fi ell 171!'1 0``1' = 8 !dig 1414 w1i.1:�a1i 1�1:!@1� :i1� .141 ai��1114.14115=��;� . . [; n!. i i i'. 4•3. b . ai pi; D p i p @e sin @ ti: 8¢ a Y1 w 1 ,1iiEigi Ulm!i1E1 1-1!WI.-..11 ,mil all 1 1 :`1 {B!1 1 !� i1= i z.1 `t i!. 1 1;1111111111 il1.1 all ell!I�t �a_ji 1=i 1111 tilt 1 Y 511. o B y 1. 1 to. i=i I it Y l! 3e °11.1 11° i ti- a S`Yi . Ia` _ 15 X e. F !i i' 3 1i YI!71 a ci 3i.' i, . b all i 'FI rl`Y. Y S ba p-1 ; ;<��i11� ,!!� 1� �i @1 131 £ t1 1� 1Bi�i�� 4pg .eiw z !p 11 1 1E Z1 ! _.4 1 iY 5414 11;44 1 Y1i3i 31 it #t1 1 48 II t1 .L e! e 1 114 ii1@1•p 11 GPew t.:fa 4y11 D a L� 1 4`; 6.11!!! Y}F.al e eC IF 1 s 1 '4 1196191! Yl 1[11 Dye 3I till ,1- di4(31 F i 1411 5E� q! id,°SY11.. i. 1'! 11 1 i i 3111'51• !hg ..^ ;141 p1 F 1Y i e a! ,. ill •1;� 'Y l.E. 11 a 113e1Y! „i.1 1X c 1 11'.111 1y1:' 1:11 111113010 0 Q_11w ail 1° i 114 ill k 1 p EY:1F a Sea 4 1.!11 1 41 -i 1 1' i 141:'1 41 YysniE 1119 I et 1111 11711 fE 111 "1 f4 111 1111 ax p.1601..1111.ti/11 1 X 14 a 1 1 41!:@ di,' 440[ill P i A Y 34,1 't:.a ! Eat @`_ Pl 0 a f i L: $1 $'ID21 p"sQ1Y11e �€ e a 1 w_° ;@�i'f;1fif a=i"!' Y13f.flap 1 411.1 i 4 "1 i _. --. 3. !§e p 1p b e i1 IV 4!1 1a. '.1, t-w° wa '.131=y g!.[/tppY- .3 �yA11ai ` i:. 1+11.1,151 i 141 1 ;le 1S°C1 t iF1 ia_e� iii!^111 1,13 1:21'PI 1 ` @. 11M1.0111 11/61;:.•11 i lio!p�.,11 1.w 1.11;fpig!f 1 1 i[lf4 i1 p _re 1141 iii,hg 1a1i1@i i,lhi..EV 1iir.d16,1 - F1 iI 0it l-t1°ile lin 11.1E 1,11 41411E 411E b 1 /, 1 11.4 11 1 . 9 i 111 :Iliiiiiiiii:i1. i Ail 1: �1! $1! :1 1=1I!ilf jI P i P I b•yala 'Si.D D r-y AE a 4 :.a` gill-l� a 3-•-s. a Y ! Y i r 1 ^xp. qq1 7lY 9imY 11.1E =111 1 13 Y4 '2'1 gq E1 11-3Q6pp@Yi03.17t i 6 i i 11142E l4 eaYi RI" 1'EA a 151E 1*21 Tit e1 1' E:A 1 1 :°-'pga' B a 11 Y ! Y Y $E3 34"11 r�y I a I°5 pppp 1111 !II! J 1 y 4y°ysa..i3-13110s1[ 1 3Y f° ae° 111;1 i1c tYt� i 1'IP! 1 ne t 110 .1si� 1. I. A:.:1 F` $ 1 ! $0 e6• ! ' 10 °1 1 iS yr. i-` 1 1 .1 1a A9• Eb 14121 g ! a �1 b,4i ¢` a• P"1 b. i , 1_ , 11- 1414_1 11[1 1 Ptp 3 131 b 1.b a!e `w :ilk i s 1 1l 11:11:3401$0 ' p 2 ao Yis 1 @j° °a pe" w-1 �!d a 9 w TiYkw 1e eqq st '1 1gbaleg yy$ 3 Fa - 1i5i ._t i<•-e i- -a1d_I !Y! axe'224 .9;4.1 7 I�a s 3r-!:° d e '�!1 `3p lai a '�1E a`Yn1� 9,4Rpp 1 3 s1 (( E- d a 1 ale pEQb Y C1 d 4 !~a da p p n13 b. �egp aa7 `! ! n v,,1 1 Ips F 11• r E1 Adi 1-001 a 1GG- d i1e p e1 d gY a yy X 1r l 3€■ 1 a €e 1�i 1151 L!?aa a IY1 a 1p r ^1a la° 31 !Ali e 1rI61 115 :sa 111 `a E °2nn X i1 b 1 a a n D j' . i ¢. ■ 1w Qb G d _1`3 'aaefi 4 ! ra t, Y° �- �.. 11. ° ai a 61 a ;".} 2 7c 1 f 1 5C E:a'� 1 7:1 4 _� ^1a!a 9 I alb '="4/10 0 i!1 1 -Bp� g"9 !Z 5C �A A e�E43ibfi FYiaxlly 0�y Y= q j %g 94 E'1 l D 1 131- a. i2 b1 24"13222;;W d1 1w 1i �y:43 iiiii-I __1 3_10111 bb w ab 1 1x"pe #1sl 1r.d 1s. 9¢; 1 Li.s SgasQal�9, < 11 33 .°.4E Y1 i1i Xe Xrt Yw : '1!t i31¢�n1 E d1 i ag n 4�E 4 g A Q ¢ 9 E 3 ds d 11 is b ld! Dld`vbd 3 as41 1 ys a3 : f.bXI 7 t X.° AYcIDQp p Arg183A 1 AY1l1 !1°Y:lap: E.:�gz l"Y eF:e§6 3 E 1a6 y _1 :e 3 42`41 1 bCI� a .13 a Zba1 b• A r.. gal a1 e ii -� - 1- ¢ 1 1 o I 1 yb 3 w� 3 i1 i p4Et !1 f d 1 F Al e 1 ?d.3 t a lit' 1 a`t-1 -1' lei kY sga kea E 5�°Qaep37Ea<ld . s .i,11111; € X n. n a n'- 1p .a A 1 E' .w. 0 bw1sA 1 1 1 a1" 1 111 �:+' :$1 1 ' ,1!Y . 1 °.1 6 1 a F,P 0,4 Sax ? 1$4: sgy b-SIn r" a I 1u 1 d i 4 qa( i s5(EE$ IPal;i 5-ee 1 li_1I.fb N33 E,"elO p x111 e a Y a'_5d1 Ip 1 X X1 li Y"I YI C S1 i €il 1• a i +1-1!;75-6 i1- p 1.Yg `4z 111 Pi-01-4i e1 e0 a s$1.4 Y i- i 1:-.1 i l 1..b ..i.g X by gip!X!M 1.1301.11 r x19 I9`"3 1 1 ti Y- i e !b 53 .!aa` ! x3 i Y ai !� 9 sFa11-i 11.1 age `id'b' a y X 1•.ib' :Y 1 eSY' ° Y er1 Y 1!1 a.1 r 1 s1`" :'i""R 4 ,wf=YE l-1Y ! _ w .ig:0! !! w p 1 c1 2 a wd11 -il b:#1111 1°- r 1: +!li° XXi1 e l 1i3a1 c - n a.4 f^.} <s15ec 1 r 1� 11 is °211.. 1 i 'r l n°p l�'l•1 l iYd.�E:p e.r, 1'315:! 1 111 1� s �3 1E i_7g p51-�3Es21 El d Qa 5r5 3 s3.31pEX;s�'R1 1 3116111`�¢1 1iF=A i 1 ad€1i i °! ip a �1p1d is @arasie 8i113�yS A i @e . 1 _1 1:05:: .53Eas: YelrllrE rnl-3:Ha s laic 1 1.1!.11 l.419..1 i.;:!?Y l 9112433 1.XY1a 1i 3lylal HON.t :1161, ----..__------- _1111...-_- t Attachment H i ? i g 21 _ , ., 6 t- 0 .2r.-.: -7------+,-------------------+ i 1 g i I I < I t I i 1 ____i_ _f_____ _____ g 1 •::,,Lts 2 fle h -., 1 1 I I 11 1 NI :Al a . , , , , , I ; s • s g- I I ; ._ ____ I 0 0 ""b'.11 '" •-•5. 9: ---- ; I c, •- g I 5Vg •c 42' _L_______I_444____± .. ____I_____ --- - I E = A- :.,, s .-¢ A 5t.ii, I , 1 I I o _. ›- ! 1 ii ;1. ,S! .10 1 ,...61 2 21 ellgith ,6::ilisqs S : I I E „,________–_.4._._—__ _-.__I___________,_` 7,,,-••=111-g -1--ii,,icecerto----: ,------...4.1_ L = h e- 1 51 2 t ,,g2 I ! dii ill JP s , ,., , * .., ,-4:01 iol SA ES K, s 11 i i I , a , . . 1 :I ,./__I m___11______1_ __I_______ :d_ .- : .1. 1 , 1 i -,- [41, t*: . 1. Y. lig ,V= 1 - i , i■I s: 'i i .-^k 1 1 I I . -7 '•., . ( I / ',.....: ‘... 1 k '....2."- Y:I .1..rili E I 10; r" ratil ,..„...- , • —.. T.'---_:,,pc_.......__,...7_..,_,,...h./___c...... 411_,N,...4__ii_i_____p__ _0_ __...., 1g gaL eT--..„........../. ligi 1 ,i1 4 I: a !:.1; r 1 L I 4g g il ..;:t tt. s. 3; . i: _112 a ; i ktat ill :.4_,, w ,1 .ipol 1 .,t----i------,--,----a----1------- t 4----- I lig4— ... , . , ) , 4° 11 . , ,.,, , 2., iri I ' 4 f Mod ,i op '!! il !. id I:II 't2 • • i C I I , _ I' 5 ri e. . I "--.---__, . . ———---- Z 1:.-- ,7.`•• -.\.• -.i.,, ,...\-;, .15C:--;;;;/: - , iNt.:,,:,;--:,;....' 1,- erici:' cg 1 5/ '"1:‘ ''■:',‘":.',II na.''''.','■‘:.:-''Ai:,.. ' . l'n ;t3^4 1;.; 1 1,5, . a 'i• ,,, •I 2 .:.:-.r „. .. ..v „,„ „....,.., : SW' ot I i 1 q , , . a,:1 I E gh i . t tN f gig leti 1 0g2 I OA 1/1 2-V li .. d =5 • ti 0 :i 4,1t 1 , EMI! I e?,.2 t t g 1 • listtk 1 i " . ' :lc = ■ . _ 1 I) '''. \ --- ,_ __ ir - Ag il i s 1 1 , '"•I ctli '[11114c --4 .c ■i I 4 !ti , , gi;-.1 s.i i. I'd,11:10! li 1.5 l il 1:.ii'si") ai 3 2 int° t I 1 ..,..,;tr.i ..5 ,i L,15 i332 12 1 le g 1 1 T I f— I I IclaVA.41faxMctra)tsa VO Ph e i I 1 1 I = 1 I i , , I i 1 I ;at r 2 — ,. . , _ — g. 2 z t I 1 -.: ",•:-'.4 1 . ll - .' '- skal ..,,, •Z;hax i 1 1 i /". ■ ".—i I .. .r`..1 ir ' K.• 1 44* '`'C'. i 1 11' ''i:::!::::t., • : 'i , '''' ,_.-.. 1 LI ::4'''!•':'' -- ..„ri . .-'',,, i . :- CL I ,:i0, :=,-- —-7 1 !I' r ';.--.:, ,,.. 0.1•1;L q!. 2 el \--- ir ' W :1 i 1 — , M m • % ___.1._-—-__ --- O. (r) . , , f 1 1 I u.1 j i '1 < 1 I i 11 14 1 i qi• !;2 t VIA.a i 1 , : •-i-gig 1, I --7---77 1-i ..., :.-l1_a_. 5,11 td-•-, !;11 = L...!.___. f 1 1 dl -,..., g . _1 i I --,-4.1 . . \--_. 1 11 tz --------,,:cl•:., :-: Di I • , % gi r 1 tii•! ii , , A 1 I :' 9k z-,1, L_ ■ I lEni :- (•-.' 11.54,, i S 111#.1 'I II rI i 16 I I I 1 111 1 ga : 1 di i 1 i 1 :It gs e ! li ,ht 1 -• i.,;11 1 1 7. I i Ii kt Stt 1 --: Ft id 4:Sil it- Pi •":,, i'l 2'i 1 i —7— 1 itigi a a 1 i I fOR ib i ,, 1 14 2 I I Ii i ....,I . tS — II I I lilt if g 1 l' I :',4128 --—--- i 1 ', 1,111„ I ill; r i 1 NI i 1 ?a , ..4 c.; I Si,I I 1 1 1 1 I s 1 1 2, 1 I — 1 ,I I F4 '4 r r i F4 ......• (CitiVA31113111131-nco)lab --.--4112. --'- ,,.......„,:::C.........=..................I i , 1 F g 21. . r' 'fir` .r �y i 3- L w o Y $ i 0 q„ I L yaa.4 I a ii a tltl . '— w t 5¢ c�a iP t w y�� :b4,NI 1 o s. 0 O — a Ei 4 w S! i ;ta 1¢ 'g - - a 4 ‘a' F s S�# is 1 1 IQ S� `.ii I+�13� _ alLs ingi r 11 ye j F ■ 1 1 'c � ' ® i p O JL al i 1 — !— 4s Ei I /1" , y as ., i 1 ' a _ __._ ' __ _ I �I/i/ I _y' iIy \ 11 kr„ i : 1 a F 1 l i 1 I:.. j i 13 f � �. •qM j / i a 1 1 i a # i AF 1 i3 I I y I. t. G.3 6" 51141 I I o o ■ aA 1 p '� �+ ig I 1 i I 1 tee.-➢: I �S° € °_••,f��f.a a I1- �:� ixq2'I �k 0 t.4 xs'a 2 y r w .,.. a3 `b xin eye W ` i I g 7 0. N 1 . w Y I 9 1 _ 3 0 � � �� a n lA' 1`f 1\ Z = W ! a 5' I i a I fiF � , ._ 'Dg 6F 9 1 g t I E S z - .._1_.� _ VI f li EL. 11L t! 1 i r J A 1 r � s 9 NC e Q5 r ;I R 1 I • 1 M i c S Fr t 1: •••,, f. s Eli e 1 1 . i 1 g i s r I w ■ 1 l' 1 I r L 1 �� I og = 6. is 'lc 1 4 7 T- " 1 xj I 1 f i I i i - —1 II • I _ ___L [11\1' A A __ r :< Fi 1 ; .14 rl-,• < , --w , .._ f 4 I , a t5 , t . i , •d irl. . II t i flp —-- —1----------—. --4' Ili 4 i ! 4 111 a_ •; : ( 114 - o ! al ! it/ cr n , M It . a - '' El . >- ,- I If • ' m , 0... 0 . T . '' L' 1 - z 3 i - 4 j - M m --4 I I I w t g 4 I Z gi2,., . I 1 IL I ;01 - 3 II 11 I C / 11 w. P.i ill !! P IP ell a eg g , III 3! ': LI 1 Li -.. — i A L i---, ---. . 0 i iill --, 4 a " •■ NI "=R 4 lip 1 6. • qui — ..,.. , — — h II I 4 5!a 1 !44 d `•-,,... . -r.': -: 11 $1- . OM • ' ''''.9••- II)\ . +PIK 7..Y.A.A g I 04 .., i ii, , I 1 5. 11 I 5 '.i 1 0 g 3 I ••.---- S045 ,e,....,..... Ilt.:14 Zk q 5 ', a; R ■ 1 al •aa . L44 Si I 11":1 e t / - - 1,, , b ■ 1 I i g ! i 111 411- bogi I 5 1 1 4 EziN El I' d 44 i.....„,..„..." . 4 i _ .....„....... kt, g , 1 •L'I I a 1...sxt 1 i i!1 , oga gl, iNti 5 I a 5 ■ 1 k .. 551 I 1 I ° I- -- 5/1, , I --_---- --___ --..---5, •,.... ... -"----__--- -1---1---I------,----...._ i 55 0 — .... —--------------Ili- --r -- —----1"- -i----- I— L , Wawa-nos darrrof iss Ira '','7,:',7 . ----.... t ..,.. —......-- ROCKEDGE RESIDENTIAL PUD TRAFFIC STUDY Project#14551 Prepared by: DAVID PLUMMER &ASSOCIATES,INC. 2149 McGregor Boulevard December 10,2014 Fort Myers,Florida 33901 Attachment I ROCKEDGE RESIDENTIAL PUD TRAFFIC STUDY Introduction The Rockedge Residential PUD is located east of Collier Boulevard on the north side of Sabal Palm Road. The Residential PUD will have up to 270 single-family-detached residential units and an amenity center for Rockedge residents. Access to Rockedge will be provided via a single, full access entrance off of Sabal Palm Road. There is a directional median opening on Collier Boulevard at Sabal Palm Road, which allows NB right turns,SB left turns and WB right turns. For purposes of this traffic study, the build-out horizon year was assumed to be 2020, as requested by County staff. This traffic study is provided in support of the proposed PUD. The traffic study was prepared consistent with Collier County Traffic Impact Statement Guidelines and the agreed upon transportation methodology shown in the Initial Meeting Checklist, as discussed in the next section of this report. Initial Meeting Checklist A pre-application meeting for the PUD was held on November 12, 2014. One of the subjects under discussion during the meeting was the methodology for the traffic study. An Initial Meeting Checklist: Traffic Impact Statement was prepared by DPA and provided to staff for review prior to the pre-application meeting. The methodology outlined in the Initial Meeting Checklist was discussed during the meeting. At the conclusion of the meeting,Mr. John Podczerwinsky of Collier County Transportation Services, who had made a few hand-written comments on the Checklist, signed the amended Checklist, indicating his approval. A copy of the signed Initial Meeting Checklist is provided in Appendix A. Project Trip Generation and Distribution Online Traffic Impact Study Software (OTISS) was used to estimate the AM and PM peak hour trip generation for the Project, consistent with ITE Trip Generation, 9th Edition. The OTISS worksheets are provided in Appendix B. To be conservative, the AM and PM peak hour trips generated by the residential units in Rockedge were not reduced to account for internal trips to/from the amenity center. The 2 resultant AM and PM peak hour trip generation estimates for Rockedge are summarized in Exhibit 1. The distribution of Rockedge trips to the external road network was based on professional judgement. As suggested by staff, it was assumed that 50%of the trips would travel to and from the north on Collier Boulevard and 50%of the trips would travel to and from the south on Collier Boulevard. To be conservative, DPA did not reflect traffic attenuation with distance from the Project, even though some of the Project's residential trips will drop off as they match up with work,shopping and social-recreational trips. The percentage trip distribution is summarized below. • Collier Boulevard north of Rattlesnake Boulevard 30% • Collier Boulevard north of Sabal Palm Road 50% • Collier Boulevard south of Sabal Palm Road 50% • Collier Boulevard south of Tamiami Trail East 10% • Rattlesnake Hammock Road west of Collier Boulevard 20% • Tamiami Trail East west of Collier Boulevard 30% • Tamiami Trail East east of Collier Boulevard 10% The resultant AM and PM peak hour trip distribution is shown in Exhibit 2. Roadway Segment Analysis Peak hour roadway conditions were evaluated for the following scenarios: • Exhibit 3 Existing 2014 traffic conditions • Exhibit 4 Future 2020 traffic conditions without the proposed PUD • Exhibit 5 Future 2020 traffic conditions with the proposed PUD Most of the data in Exhibits 3-5 were derived from the Collier County 2014 Annual Update and Inventory Report (AUIR), which is included in Appendix C, including existing traffic volumes, trip bank trips, average annual traffic growth rates, level of service standards, and roadway service volumes at the adopted standard. As recommended by staff, future background traffic volumes were estimated based on the higher of the two: existing 2014 volume plus trip bank trips; or existing 2014 volume increased by the average annual growth rate through 2020. Project traffic for future conditions with the PUD were based on the ITE trip generation and Project trip distribution described above. As shown in Exhibits 3-5, no road segments are projected to exceed the adopted level of service standard. Therefore, there are no road segments significantly and adversely impacted by the Project. 3 Traffic Mitigation Plan No road improvements are needed due to the proposed PUD. The Rockedge Residential PUD will mitigate its traffic impacts through the payment of road impact fees. The applicant will also be responsible for all site-related improvements at the Project entrance on Sabal Palm Road. 4 EXHIBIT 1 ROCKEDGE PUI) ITE TRIP GENERATION(1) AM PEAK HOUR PM PEAK HOUR LUC SIZE In Out Total % In Out Total % Residential Single Family 210 270 d.u. 50 149 199 162 95 257 Internal Capture 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% External 50 149 199 162 95 257 Pass-by 0 0 0 0 0 0 Net New External 50 149 199 162 95 257 TOTAL 50 149 199 162 95 257 INTERNAL CAPTURE 0 0 0 0% 0 0 0 0% DRIVEWAY VOLUME 50 149 199 162 95 257 PASS-BY 0 0 0 0 0 0 NET NEW EXTERNAL 50 149 199 162 95 257 Footnotes; (1) Trip generation estimate based on OT1SS analysis using ITE Trip Generation,9th Edition. N.T.S. U) 39(19) RATTLESNAKE HAMMOCK ROAD 10(32) 0 co N n 149(95) SABAL PALM ROAD w 50(162) 3 0 0 11 r1 C3, 150 s �6 14551/01A/1214 ROCKEDGE RESIDENTIAL PUD dpi TRAFFIC STUDY PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION 2 k_ ( # k K 2 k Z Z IQ TT � � 4 r- & ) z % 0000 0 z z z z j q -J > § -o 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 8 > u m 0 2 C @ 0 e 0 0 $ a � a4 of vi n co Co• o o o o 0 j \ / f - - \ 2 $ $ R » + § ( 8@ 2 2 0 a o < < \ f3 ,- f % « 2 > \ I } 7 I a 2 2 2 co \ w w } } \ « « « \ /aS G / ] w w w w w a o a c 2 / 2f / \ S § S 9 S CO § / 2 k 2 \ \ Cr \ ( k7 § ] ( { $ > 03 \ O 7 § \ al § k \ CO C -1 ` Cd 2 - / - 77 / � ƒ w ) � \ ] r 5 = - - ) / ) I 0 3 j I / § f f « 2a73 2 ) / ) 0 § _ _ _ § ) E ■ f a a q 0 0 x � ° 2 = -, L \ k \ a _ § £ § a m , > m - = m 40 P. \ a � ) U 0 \ \ f kf ) ? \ k § \ ƒt ) 8 • _ - # 0 � o_g Cl) e Cl) e 0 0 0 G E 2 f # / 2 § ; Cs ▪ « o B % a a q I ± w \ 2 { 7 7 LLI 0 K 2 < } \ � F t \ Cl L2 9 < ea I - < & / ƒ \ co Ne m k ® ) k 7 ) Etc_ E x kx ui o o < < < 723E 0 w CC u a = o r w Cl) u - C'') 1 X ( > q « « Io & _ z N w & .....a .....a § V k, § zzz 0 zz zz zV ) �\ \7 § \ } § ( / [ i i® � § \( k § ) 2 ■ 4 } z ( , o - > t § (\ § / 2 / ! ) > 10 \��� �R � k ) lf , � -:=4 \ } § ) / . ) m , - .-- \as 7 ) CU 2 cm o 0 ^ v:/ § £ \ E z g ( ( § x b � § f \ \ K - % j § 3 zz ; _ | ®I § zzzz m cam 7 § 0 F F a> ,< a§ I WWUW u mo 00 26 ' kS2E2 0 on ma ` 2 ~ \ k . , E o 3 ) ra ( w § ] ) / / 7 , i » C $ ] \ 0 - \ } \ � W ` 0 § £ £ i ± / # 4f a / k § _ « F � 0 0 , 2o / / f ■ I .ai k E - � ( � 2 E ok Z 1CC / _ 0 .E ƒ -Jk � ] k § ( e as 2 oz E - - ` 2f $ ° J mg.f...) R « f ? ? $& & ) � {) § % \ § � § U. 02 « e 0 20 0 ) . { ko ' 1 / are § E << w� 0 e E E < « $ = m o EJJ , ay cc R _ w 0 8 . c 5n k _ �g § d w ) } m2k2 : E 2w 0 >- co 2 F " Ei | A § ) 9 i < § § r - < { k ) / ƒ } } U bU. a 2 0 ± I- $ /2 �Ne a 9999 z 2 z 2 2 N E N ti�j g m q Z 2 9 99 ;..z N t a Yk -675 y ° y e ' y .! ,9n.!& , - J .- N o .- N G N w 11111111111 . 2 14 V Y 2 N 11 z2=2 2 22 22 4, 888 § s 8s . 2 0oO U1� M CW N N III 010110110111 g .1121 a a 'ffl !!!I!I!I ! w T Q W I1III00 O li P N S ' u s a 0ggiIii00 1 $•rl N Np Y 11111 a m H a e o 10 > 3 ss"'218 a ❑ a a m m Eg a = a J 3 O Y = d a §w I 1 iwIli W m O � v s m � E ° m * a w o _ g Q O s a o N t a F , 2 O E ° c d E N E `� m c 55 5 a �$�$ o Q K w A "O W O U] M C �y 2 2 ' a0 p .o1E vy ma a m C ° y-g� eC 'm �U U m �n''E a3 mm m Wv �° it58 i' (,, W yy NS—.R N U cN cniv F"li Off ' m Ero a �3 3 y op Z.g a n z a w 0 m 0 1- N 1-U 0 0 m y C g aw 8 Q E 5g2 < < E W N a 2 I li p c� . c g » to W O J 2 1 18iC < a mI N f7 m _1 a § a 0 0 0 0 o W Q O T m Z Q F . mm N N m Y¢ Y a .��oo �ffiroy ,FC m o Q �( �Y(1 O J amQ x ¢ m H r tL 1 W d a Fa- o N�J Y N�0 APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST APPENDIX A INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST: TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT Suggestion: Use this Appendix as a worksheet to ensure that no important elements are overlooked. Cross out the items that do not apply. Date: 11/12/14 Time: 9-10 am • Location: Collier County Development Services People Attending: Name,Organization,and Telephone Numbers U John Podczerwinsky 2)Ronald Talone 3) J 4) 5) Study Preparer: Preparer's Name and Title:Ronald Talone Organization: David Plummer&Associates,Inc. Address &Telephone Number: 2149 McGregor Boulevard,Fort Myers,FL; (239) 332-261.7 Reviewer(s): Reviewer's Name&Title:John Podczerwinsky Collier County Transportation Services;(239)252-81.92 Reviewer's Name&Title: Organization&Telephone Number: Applicant: Applicant's Name: Waterrnen Development Group Address: Telephone Number: Proposed Development: Name: Rockedge PUD Location: East side of Collier Boulevard, north of Sahal Palm Road Land Use Type: Single-Family-Detached Residential TIE Code#: 210 Proposed number of development units: Unto 27{)(subject to chance) Other: Amenity Center Description: ETiB ✓ri.:.rw t�l.c ..m.,YCr:,w?O.9rt Zoning Existing: Comprehensive plan recommendation: Requested: Single-Family Residential Findings of the Preliminary Study: Study Type: Small Scale TIS Minor TIS C Major TIS Study Area: Boundaries: Sabal Palm Road; Collier Boulevard between Lcly Cultural Parkway and Grand Le.ly Drive Additional intersections to be analyzed:N/A v' Horizon Year(s): To be determined Q, .) Analysis Time Period(s): M and PM peak hour trip generation; PM peak hour for adjacent street system Future Off-Site Developments:N/A Source of Trip Generation Rates: 11.E Trip Generation. 9`h Edition Reductions in THIS-Generation Rates: None:N/A V' Pass-by trips: N/A Internal trips (MD):N/A ✓ Transmit use: Other: Horizon Year Roadway Network Impilovements: Collier'Boulevard—6 lanes,divided ✓ / Sabal Palm Road'--2 lanes.undivided ✓ �I31-1 Methodology &Assumptions: Non-site traffic estimates: 2014 AUIR: 2014. Total Volume (including 2014 1/7th Total Trip Bank' Site-nip generation:ITE Trip Generaton.9'`'Edition • Trip distribution method:Manual distribution based on professional judgement — ) 6 S tt' Traffic assignment method:Manual.assignment based on professional judgement Co lL (s2.... Traffic growth rate:From AUIR,Average Growth Rate(AGR)of 2%per year I iri .. .r,.�,� V'h{,....�.i,r rv). - !i 4e Y. u.. ? Special Features: (from eliminary study or prior experience) Accidents locations• Sight distance` 41 f 4 Queuing: P,4- Access loco on & configuration: Entrance on Sabal Palm Road: full access: T intersection ( ua.n.r -0 -tom a 54VAt... arNcet r1.4. 16 TGt `7? Fez.. -R, 5-T'Y. Traffic control: Directional median opening on Collier Boulevard at Sabal Palm Road:;ek °fL. WB stou sign control on Sabal Palm Road at Collier Boulevard MB right turn onlvl Signal system location&progression needs;N/A On-site parking needs: — Data Sources: .. Base maps: — Prior study reports: Access policy and jurisdiction: " Review process: :- Requirements: Miscellaneous: - SIGNATURES Study Preparer if ,,-- R yiLwers Applicant ,, j) E N:lv.,, y .nut+•4^..'.J... V.-:!!;,10,0,-?:,1,4,t„tn,a7..MF-TS,Lw - 0 I . ....... '• I I...,.. ... :, . . . ---. r.— ., . • . . . ,•:,.. 1 ., . „. . . .. ._ ._..,_, _. ' . . • , . -.■ -N. , 7'7:- "L. __,.. ..... . . ... . ., .„. g:1-42:'..-'. ,.r.-7::.-.'''.!':":-..-'.'....'' ''-;',:•--- •••• % .'".. ': .-r.it i: r.:, (.:,.... ::, :L..: :...::...a.j.:-:„.../ - S'Z.S;ir_.. i ....1.-...-..';':-.... ...:::!.71::::i''.'.- -1.:.'-'•,'-....':;• .,......1).,;.;.1.'-..'..1..i.....2';•'-:-::: ::';-'-'-C-‘--.. :...._'L... .. I'. --.; . . ',-.1.',.. - •-4'..,....-:,1..2--.: .:.:,.....--- ;;.:,'.7,,,,-";:"0.1:, v.'.-',!--,-,..-,,s-, : -..,.::. ':. . 1 .,,i . . ::...:........:...!.. ■ '2',7%,":-i4i,:,A'-..,Y.::.-,:'..;--,.•''''.-':i-.f'.':. 1,:-...:',:.','..- ';-:-:'.,,.-,- ........... ... .... __,.., : :.•':„:,."2,'-t.....li''.'..,.-''..'---''',',.',i :',..';:•-..-:-;if; ..-. '..;:',:':':'...--- '-':-..' ':' .,"--,4',. ._..:-..---■...;' i- 1 D,.--t,,,:::-.71-.."7-....,:-.-i, ;•-.-,-:•-es.:" .:.-,.. ..... --- _;..-,.. ..... '' -- ,.- ..:.,.. AT-LL.:1:114.,..: .-I-:":4:.•'.''.'.---',::'::.' .. ...... r-;?.. •_-.:-•.-,. ,:', : .- -- .---,.. ... .. . . Tin,..,,..:-.s.,,-=.,F1 ! ': -: ":•.'- --,:.:4,.. i!_:::',' .::::'--,:, __. . , ..... .. :: .1,..i4i;.:;;,..'f4':?e•-•:...,.-„,::.;:f .2,-. ..,..!„.-,,,,:..,•..,‘_',-...',......;-1.,.:....,_ , . : 1 .__._.„ .,.., . - '-- 'i..'fiq......;'-r-41.:.'..-:-.'.......,.,'-i._ '.."'-'2•]1"..1::-:•.:4T'r.'%'''4,,,'-'''''-'- .- '''.j..0 . -: " i., . , =,-;.-:.,,,t,,-,......±i:::*.....;::,,..A..'„,i ,-.::::.:-.,..,,,,:_-,•:',:,,...2t:,..,:i.-... ,,,..,. .,,,,. !, ,...... . .,.,_.... '.7..z.,:-.:. ..=.•,....5.41.• v.3-:.;1, - ..,..:.- , ..:;".....„-:.,,:,;:l-.,., :.-4r-.-.:...:., 7;:.;i7.:`.&41-.7.,',',?4,--....,F,:$..1- --:•.--.,:-'2-•.-...:-.------.-- i„,..-,.,., . "._ .. .,...... ., ,... .......,.-,-. , i ;,'...ittiili:'',i,:gg.A.,..:V.,:.! •'' .„;4'.'.:-..,....•.'!:".1,1-;;-',1,....-,....-1,. .i4i..2..;-,;;;'.5.i,,.-E:1;f4-N.4,,',:-1 ...::''::t. .• '''Sf:.'-':';.'..—4 r.',- . _.„, _. — : , .: 4: ,:,-..,,,T. . , ,:::J.,_:f,-.,.-,.- ., .-;:-?-5:,...,::2:;;;.,:,•,,,,,-;f:',4c• 4..,..,-.:„. , -::::-....:::::i._ .,,, •- ....._... . . 4"..,T,•5,4,4::.:i•Zigf';'''-.7-,' :'-'.5.1.R1,1,7*;.'4.74:,?.?..•'.:: ... ......47;,1; ••.•"" ' ,-.7,.. . - . ••• -:-.-• , . ' •• •.`• _., , all'";:.:f•L'gifiSii- -''''..., , ..,.... — • . ....,__._.... , l'.7-'14.''' '''''.'",t''''','''.7.11.‘',3;•,'':• _,...._ i0:7'.2;''. tt,"•:=14 .V.,.' . .. ,i_.,,,_,_.........,...„_...,,_._.___,.........._,„..,:i., ... ' l '-',.. i ' • -A.421:•-u..4,17.557.t4-..-:.A.:.,p7.,,..,:,, ,... ... . .. •- .-- - • _...... ...,:-• - , , _.... ,. EF..2:;;if.F.,P.H,._4._..,-,..i...wzy,,,,,,-.-,..,•. t . . ......... . i e, ,:, ' 177' Nbjp , . . • :.-.."' _ : 1: ''• ONi"2 -1.. ''''''....rA:;•''''''' ' /( ,,i'''' ,,,,,,A ',,,,,,,,. Iii.•:. .',.k.• •:...- '- '''.--..- •,,'' ._., , .7 ....•.,:;..••',-- /N,' .' ;3r4.1‹.':,,..•..:. ..i'F''...'"::.3.f.,t,',.'''' ''.„._ ,, ., • 7C,...W.:::•.:V.?. V..:.,,-.4.'I;' -.. !!. 1,,,::;,,F4:',:., : ), 7 A.0.0 ,-, '',74,Z,r,I,r,i,„.. .3:11—'.-,,,,..V.3... -..........--' • •,-.....------,... - 14.1,l'hIJ XIS.1,300.1?km -1- .ir.•;04. :goitiffj / NEINOMMIll lb, H: e.t.lkailflo-0.4F`OWIPOV_RTP1.11.35 Fi44 Minor trOate0Needs Pian...20 for&APO 51-11! . . APPENDIX B OTISS TRIP GENERATION WORKSHEETS Period Setting • • Analysis Name: AM Peak Hour Project Name: Rockedge PUD No: 14551 Date: 12/5/2014 City: Collier County State/Province: Florida Zip/Postal Code: Country: United States Client Name: Watermen Development Group Analyst's Name: JTJ Edition: ITE-TGM 9th Edition • Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total 210-Single- j Dwelling Units 270 Weekday,Peak Hour of I Best Fit(LIN) i 50 149 199 Family — -- Adjacent Street Traffic, Detached I One Hour Between 7 and Housing 9 a.m. • Traffic Reductions Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 210-Single-Family Detached Housing 0 v'% 50 pT-j% 149 External Trips Land Use External Trips Pass-by% Pass-by Trips Non-pass-by Trips r ! 210-Single-Family detached Housing 199 10 p 0 199 ITE Deviation Details Weekday,Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,One Hour Between 7 and 9 a.m. Landuse No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 210-Single-Family Detached Housing ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by%for this case. Summary Total Entering 50 Total Exiting 149 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Entering Pass-by Reduction 0 Total Exiting Pass-by Reduction 0 Total Entering Non-Pass-by Trips 50 Total Exiting Non-Pass-by Trips 149 Period Setting ! Analysis Name: PM Peak Hour Project Name: Rockedge PUD No: 14551 Date: 12/5/2014 City: Collier County • State/Province: Florida Zip/Postal Code: Country: United States Client Name: Watemien Development Group { Analyst's Name: JTJ Edition: ITE-TGM 9th Edition Land Use Independent Variable Size Time Period Method Entry Exit Total .. . _ .... r-•-------__,_._..------. ...__ _. •_ 162 95 257 210-Single- ( Dwelling Units 270 Weekday,Peak Hour of Best Fit(LOG) Family "" "' I Adjacent Street Traffic, Detached 1 One Hour Between 4 and Housing I 6p.m. Traffic Reductions Land Use Entry Reduction Adjusted Entry Exit Reduction Adjusted Exit 210-Single-Family Detached Housing [6-1°73 162 p,....,.,a/° 95 External Trips Land Use External Trips Pass-by% Pass-by Trips Non-pass-by Trips 210-Single-Family Detached Housing 257 0 j"j4 0 257 ITE Deviation Details Weekday,Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic,One Hour Between 4 and 6 p.m. Land use No deviations from ITE. Methods No deviations from ITE. External Trips 210-Single-Family Detached Housing ITE does not recommend a particular pass-by%for this case. Summary Total Entering 162 Total Exiting 95 Total Entering Reduction 0 Total Exiting Reduction 0 Total Entering Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Exiting Internal Capture Reduction 0 Total Entering Pass-by Reduction 0 Total Exiting Pass-by Reduction 0 Total Entering Non-Pass-by Trips 162 Total Exiting Non-Pass-by Trips 95 APPENDIX C COLLIER COUNTY 2014 ANNUAL UPDATE AND INVENTORY REPORT(AUIR) S3" mo. = rS« M..,1°�e€._'z••'. °g`-.33e. :e5LEKl_:=-�'An^k' 'A':�,yw,_.•,r.'- +`�"g 1 C fi a n ry e Q o - w�j- n c ...,n o o w° r-�-o� r. `: o'o v S gg? Srv_SY ' _ `�sep^`O.T. 3` 2F..."�i <_._b9.°,n,°S_7..li< ^W�' �,.'4.R.c-°.re :�,rv. 31 i S i .mom T� f ; 'v°°''&R.-.v_-rvoo;�oly-,35ro-- 01-2E,,,aoo $m H:,,H;IH�-` �(:i.�°°.°_JO^.NYI.°-:ro I1 al 0000600000 6010- 1°U.o.c—Qbj0000001-7 . pM1h HOOOCOOIiii '.., 1 I.1 + inca:::;::::�ccoQ- - .::::a Qna®owv Ell1111111111111:111111MMEIIMPPII acs I j I glg ii _t ICI '4I_*A3 111111111111111111111111111111111111111111M h III HIIIIHhIIIHIIiiIIIhuIIIIIIIhiiliiiihIIldIIIIhii 1..i I�i of iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii '-:.! 1 i 1: l - a L Iil r 1 l I III c J i i C 1z 1 n u: : : sion a i0: io oi: Vo AM000 NM I 'k MOSOMM BSI IONEMEMO R m n m:{`'°M`l r".1 a: rt Y 3 12 Ir- Aliiiiiiiiiiiii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii hla -2Yr° 1° O ill: U 4 a•• m m mu Jw 1 .4 Ef.a _ - Li = e ry - a _- IN _ r•.v- O vl __ � O _ _ rIH in 74 74 r r n I 1 Ala 21 v ..1.g. N ?‘1,1;1: 111111111111111111111111111111 . JII: ii iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii , HIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIM 0 11111111MIENR1111 i iAle o _ 1 10 'JP 1 d 7b5 in y $ ��.4 x cyy�1 g i d eA 1 uE:�._ Uh Od 3 n Va Lgiu Ili]] _ yy �l11_ B81tpeg 2 IJ I i i $i t - k t- f=` 2 - 1" � 1�Z9 fail •� CC GG ..Ill£ � cy ai Y�ye�dyy dill� - n .' '''pppq� � -E - il d G ._.�..)J ..d 3 J Z - 4 e6p IP.L C� YY vl 07 Vai Vii F F �.. H 6 �V UVV i fitt ga 5 to di .Y, +W 1 0 I f jJ _,1„, vnhS'.•^lb nSE vcv.__...�..�.,.ornn�•'° �o1 ^<i": i A„- i c c ji[ O p O 0 0�C O O Q O 0 0�O,0 0 p O,C(«r:O�0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0�0 0 0 o p 0 0 010,0 0 0 !�p O q.n���0 0 0 p 4�0 0 �I ,11 In n r.`^;;;;w v;11 2 c 3;;;ni;;F��°-Ir°w w'oo;;;;i.�r.'h aw;a`.IS':4'70.o^.wla o.o, .. '# . 13 Q; «<` €W aatTF es ,r,,_„,,,o- - =oaoo=o o=oa. r'°1 __ Agl 0 0 0 6 p 0 0 0 O l al= �`"'�` apoRa== ,° =a=_p=_o$,aooE= _ �000p000 =====°oaope to"' O o T O O O O, T O w.El l a'O O T N� R Olc o=coo O O O O O C C 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7}X�Lyys�_ C c O R 1 W,4: N rsltiti'iHr III 11111111111111111 k i 1E71 1 ul "'FP Illiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii<'P RE - 1 IlüilIlI1lllIillIIlll1IIIliOhIHIOIIII1II 4{f1� Y 1.1- 1 liii nnoummilaa:::acorn::::o:a1 Il lost ilicommosammilliiiiiiiiiimill Ili 1 iiiiiimmiiiiimum .u''''''1 w 11111 1 . e -, U. .2 z R H �g=4- aye I ! II I fO IC at ° 1 Null - A 1 11111 gg N 11111111111111 : 1111111111111111111111111 11111111 a 10pp O_ =ry0 p10 O6pp-•;6 � Gt00,0,YO,'00p0wPOeoo CC po {00000 OOOPc - O st n nn'i m�+f<v Onq,;;hh N;;;F,<P 14 a{ tea dr a , 1 A CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT OF THE ROCKEDGE PARCEL COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL CONSERVANCY, INC. 1 b le v. .n4y'.lt f xi-` - € a.. -*-. , '" a° # �' '4 Via, \,,,,,, ‘000 � � ,a "a ' kp �,.+ ." '�p ' &.ms 4. y M 1 x , e r ", ',`° '',4-,,. `, ,I orb ,.. 1i-' a° 4 4 , s 4 � AHC TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 1024 1 OCTOBER 2014 Attachment J A CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT OF THE ROCKEDGE PARCEL COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Robert S. Carr, M.S. Andrew J. Weidman, M.A. John Wesley White, B.A. John Beriault, B.A. ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL CONSERVANCY, INC. 4800 SW 64th Avenue, Suite 107 Davie, Florida 33314 954-792-9776 arch lgcl @bellsouth,net For: WATERMEN AT ROCKEDGE NAPLES,LLC AHC PROJECT NO. 2014.51 AHC TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 1024 OCTOBER 2014 ,(7 4, Ifth TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES II CONSULTANT SUMMARY 1 PROJECT SETTING 4 PREVIOUS RESEARCH 10 CULTURAL SUMMARY 15 METHODOLOGY 24 SUMMARY OF SITES 27 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 43 REFERENCES CITED 47 APPENDIX I: FIELD SPECIMEN LOG 55 APPENDIX II: FLORIDA SURVEY LOG 58 APPENDIX IV: FLORIDA SITE FORMS: 8CR726, 8CR873, 8CR874, 8CR875, 8CR896, 8CR897, 8CR898, 8CR1371, 8CR1372 63 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. USGS map of the Rockedge parcel 3 Figure 2. 1876 plat map for Township 50S, Range 26E with the project parcel boundaries superimposed 5 Figure 3. 1944 Copeland map for Township 50S, Range 26E with the project parcel boundaries superimposed 6 Figure 4. 1952 black&white aerial photograph of the project parcel 7 Figure 5. 1980 black &white aerial photograph of the project parcel 8 Figure 6. 2013 color aerial orthophotograph of the project parcel 9 Figure 7. USGS map showing all previously recorded sites within one mile of the project parcel 14 Figure 8. 2014 aerial photograph depicting shovel tests 26 Figure 9. Aerial photograph of CR726 with shovel tests 28 Figure 10. Positive shovel test 9 at base of pedestalled live oak, CR726 29 Figure 11.View north of eastern component of CR726 29 Figure 12. Aerial photograph of CR873 and CR874 with 2003-2014 Shovel tests 32 Figure 13. Aerial photograph of CR875 with shovel tests 34 Figure 14.Aerial photograph of CR898 with shovel tests 38 Figure 15. Aerial photograph of CR1371 with shovel tests 40 Figure 16. Aerial photograph of CR1372 with shovel tests 42 Figure 17. 2014 Rockedge plat plan with archaeological site delineations 46 ii CONSULTANT SUMMARY In May through June, 2014, the Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. (AHC) conducted a cultural resource assessment for Watermen at Rockedge Naples, LLC, of the Rockedge parcel in Collier County. The 107.9 acre parcel is located in Township 50S, Range 26E, Section 23 (Figure 1). The parcel lies to the north of Sabal Palm Road east of its intersection with Collier Boulevard(CR 951). The project parcel was surveyed to locate and assess any sites of archaeological and/or historical significance. This assessment was conducted to fulfill historic resource requirements in response to State of Florida and Collier County historic preservation guidelines. The work and the report conform to the specifications set forth in Chapter 1A- 46,Florida Administrative Code. Since 2003 parts of the overall parcel have been subject to cultural resource assessments focused on various smaller parcels that would eventually characterize the greater Rockedge parcel. The first cultural resource assessment of the Newton PUD parcel in 2003 resulted in the documentation of four archaeological sites, CR873, CR874, CR875, and CR726 (Beriault 2003b). In 2004 a twenty-acre parcel called Newton Square was assessed,resulting in the documentation of three archaeological sites: CR896, CR897 and CR898 (Beriault 2004b). This 2014 assessment included both a pedestrian survey and systematic shovel testing of the Rockedge parcel that included several new contributing parcels. Areas previously inaccessible in 2003 and 2004 because of inundation also were tested. A total of 205 shovel tests were excavated across the parcel of which 51 were positive for cultural material. All previously recorded sites to be affected by proposed development were assessed including two newly recorded sites, CR1371 and CR1372. Those sites assessed in 2003 located within a proposed preservation area were revisited except for CR896 and CR897 which were entirely within the preservation area. Sites CR726, CR874, and CR875, and CR898 were tested in the vicinity of any proposed development. A total of nine archaeological sites were documented on the project parcel. All are prehistoric middens. All or parts of six sites (CR874, CR875, CR896, CR897, CR898, CR1371) are regarded as potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Four sites lie within areas proposed for development (CR726, CR873, CR1371, CR1372). Five sites lie within the proposed preservation area (CR874, CR875, CR896, CR897, CR898) Several vacant structures occur on the parcel, none of which were determined to be over 50 years old. Two sites, CR874 and CR875, are regarded as the most significant on the parcel because they are large with deep cultural deposits, much of which are intact despite modern clearing and development on the western and northern portions of the sites. Those areas of intact midden were identified in 2003 and are proposed for preservation within the environmental preserve. 1 Newly recorded sites CR1371 and CR1372 are black earth middens. Both are disturbed from prior quarrying of organic topsoils apparently for use by a commercial nursery. Site CR1371 is largely disturbed, but a small area is intact and that area is potentially eligible for listing in the National Register based on Criterion D. That part of the site should be avoided; if avoidance is not feasible, then a Phase II assessment should be conducted. Site CR1372 is a sparse midden and highly disturbed and not eligible for listing based on available data. Monitoring should be conducted within 90 feet of any ground-disturbances of any recorded sites. If any intact cultural deposits are encountered they should be documented. Detailed guidelines for archaeological monitoring and protection of significant archaeological sites are provided in the recommendations section of this report. 2 PROJECT SETTING The Rockedge parcel encompasses 107.9 acres of former agricultural fields, residential lots, wetlands, and uncleared woodland located in west-central Collier County in the Rattlesnake Hammock area north of Saba! Palm Road and east of Collier Boulevard. The parcel lies in Township 50S, Range 26E, Section 23. The relevant USGS Quadrangle map is Belle Meade(Figure 1). Historically, the project area was characterized by pine and cypress flatwoods, hardwood hammocks, and cypress ponds and sloughs. The state surveyor, John A. Henderson, depicted on the 1876 plat map for Township 50S, Range 26E two deep cypress sloughs lying to the east and west of Section 23 (Figure 2). A trail or logging tram line is depicted on the Copeland map as traversing the project parcel (Figure 3). Today, the project parcel consists of remnant hydric southern slash pine/saw palmetto flatwoods, low cypress forests, and numerous tropical hardwood/cabbage palm hammocks. Most of the parcel has been impacted by expanding communities of invasive exotic plants including melaleauca (Melaleauca quinquenervia) and Brazilian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius). There are also emerging cabbage palm communities throughout the parcel. Approximately thirty percent of the parcel has been cleared and farmed and is now fallow farm fields covered with weedy second-growth. There are the remains of a modern cottage in the north-central portion of the parcel and several other residential structures and outbuildings, none of which were determinded to be over 50 years old. Plant communities include succulent marsh plants such as fire flag (Thalia geniculata), arrowhead (Sagittaria spp.), and pickerelweed (Pontederia lanceolata) occur in the marshes. Small stands of pop ash (Fraxinus caroliniana) and buttonbush (Cephalthanthus occidentalis) may be present and provide a woody midstory growth along marsh edges. Amongst emerging cabbage palms are remnants of moderately large slash pine (Pinus elliotii var. densa). High ground areas include live oak, cabbage palm and tropical hardwood hammocks that include myrsine, white stopper, camphorwood, soft-leafed and shiny leafed wild coffee, wild lime, lancewood, strangler fig, gumbo limbo,willow bustic, hog plum, coral bean, fire bush,hackberry, and red mulberry. The geology of the area is characterized by solutioned and chalky limestone caprocks exposed or overlain by sands or shelly marls. A fine gray to tan sand found extensively in the district is poorly drained fine sand which usually overlies relict marine deposits of shelly marl and limestone caprock that are part of the Pleistocene Caloosahatchee formation. These marine marls contain lenses and deposits of clay intermixed with varying percentages of sand. These clays may have been a source for ceramic manufacture by the Formative period Native Americans. Soil types present on the parcel include Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum; Boca fine sand; Chobee, Winder and Gator soils, depressional; Boca, Riviera, limestone substratum, and Copeland fine sands, depressional; and Hilolo,Jupiter, and Margate fine sands (USDA 2014). 4 PREVIOUS RESEARCH Southern Florida has been a focus of archaeological investigations since the 1880s, although much of the early work was directed toward the recovery of museum quality artifacts rather than understanding cultural processes. The first attempt to systematically survey the area's archaeological sites was by Ales Hrdlicka, who explored the coast and tidal mangrove estuaries in 1918, focusing on the Ten Thousand Island region (Hrdlicka 1922). HrdliCka noted that southwest Florida was a distinct region within south Florida and made an attempt to type sites by function. John M. Goggin was the first to define a south Florida cultural area (Glades Area), and describe south Florida ceramics (Glades ware), establishing a basis for later archaeological work. He published an analysis of the ceramic sequence in south Florida (Goggin 1939). In later reports (Goggin, 1947, 1949a, 1949b), he formulated a basic framework of cultural areas and chronologies that is still current (although modifications with additional data have been made, see further discussion below). Goggin (1949b) summarized much of this information in an unpublished manuscript. For several decades, many of the modern archaeological investigations in the region took place in the Cape Haze, Charlotte Harbor and Pine Island areas. Arlene Fradkin from the University of Florida investigated sites in the Pine Island Sound/Sanibel Island area in the 1970s. Her first project was at the Wightman site on northern Sanibel Island (Fradkin 1976). In 1983,Marquardt began a series of investigations at Josslyn Key,Useppa Island, Pineland, Buck Key, Galt Island in Lee County, and at Big Mound Key in Charlotte County (Marquardt 1984, 1987, 1988, 1992). Marquardt and Russo also excavated at Horrs Island where large shell midden sites there appear to be late Archaic, indicating a more elaborate social organization at and larger sedentary or semi-sedentary population than previously known for the Late Archaic period(Russo 1990). Most of the recent studies focused on the coastal sites, as have subsequent summaries and discussions. Recent work on the interior has made significant advances in documenting the extent of inland sites, especially in the Big Cypress and Everglades parks (Ehrenhard et al., 1978, 1979; Ehrenhard and Taylor 1980). Beriault and colleagues (1981) reported on salvage excavations at Bay West Nursery (8CR200). Their description of the site represents the first documentation of a Middle Archaic mortuary pond in Collier County. In the last two decades increasing development and the requirements of land use legislation resulted in a number of reports by cultural resource management consultants. While most of these reports are limited in scope many have produced useful summaries of regional archaeology, as well as insightful analysis of the relationship between site types and location and ecotypes (Almy and Deming 1982, 1986a, 1986b; Fuhrmeister et al. 1990). 10 Arthur W. Lee, John Beriault and others in the Southwest Florida Archaeological Society (SWFAS) have recorded and investigated a large number of archaeological sites in Collier and Lee Counties. It is an ongoing effort of the Society to publish and disseminate reports and manuscripts (Lee et al. 1993, 1997, 1998; Beriault 1973, 1986; Beriault and Strader 1984). Many of these reports deal with small interior sites. In addition, Beriault completed several unpublished manuscripts as to site types and archaeological areas (Beriault 1982, 1987). In April of 1991, David Dickel conducted a selective countywide assessment of archaeological sites adding many newly recorded sites to the Florida Master Site File. AHC has a twenty-year history of assessing several large tracts of land surrounding and adjacent to the project parcel in the Belle Meade/Lely/Rattlesnake Hammock area, beginning with the assessment of the Arete Country Club in 1990 (Carr and Haiduven 1990). A 1993 assessment in the Lely Estates parcel located immediately west of the current project parcel resulted in the documentation of one previously recorded site, 8CR726, and the discovery of six new archaeological sites surrounding Henderson Slough (Carr and Steele 1993). In 1999, a total of thirteen archaeological sites were reported by AHC archaeologists in the 2300-acre Winding Cypress Parcel immediately south of the project parcel (Beriault 1999). In 2003 AHC assessed the 60-acre Collier Regional Medical Center immediately north of the project(Beriault 2003a). In 2003 and 2004, work on the Newton Square PUD parcel (now a portion of the present project parcel) resulted in six previously unrecorded archaeological sites being reported (Beriault 2003b, 2004b). In 2004 and 2005 AHC personnel assessed the 2000+acre Feathers(later called Toll-Rattlesnake)parcel adjacent and to the north and east, finding five new sites (Beriault 2004a, Beriault and Weaver 2005). A 2006 project for the widening of Collier Boulevard resulted in the determination that a portion of the Buschelman Site, 8CR726, existed in the right-of-way (Beriault 2006). In 2007 AHC recorded three archaeological sites in the 200+- acre San Marino Parcel V2 mile north of the project parcel (Beriault 2007). A 2011 reassessment of the Hacienda Lakes Parcel led to the recording of three archaeological sites (Carr and Mankowski 2011). In 2007 AHC initiated a multi-year investigation and monitoring of development of the Henderson Marsh complex of sites west of the project parcel. These sites included the extensive Buschelman Site, 8CR726 and the Lely Sites #1 (8CR747), #3 (8CR749), #5 (8CR750), #4 (8CR751), and#6 (8CR752) (Beriault et al. 2006, Mankowski et al. 2007, Carr et al 2007, Carr et al. 2008). The current project parcel has been the subject of various archaeological assessments since 2003. AHC first completed a reconnaissance-level assessment of a portion of the parcel (then called Newton PUD) in 2003 (Beriault 2003b) documenting three previously unrecorded archaeological sites (8CR873, 8CR874 and 8CR875) and documenting an eastern component of(8CR726). In 2004 an assessment of a twenty-acre addition in the eastern portion of the parcel (called Newton Square) resulted in the documentation of three additional unrecorded archaeological sites (8CR896, 8CR897 and 8CR898 — 11 Beriault 2004b). In 2006 AHC returned to the parcel (now called Rockedge) and dug a series of systematic shovel tests across the parcel (Beriault and Crump 2006). LITERATURE REVIEW A search was requested on 4/28/14 with the Florida Division of Historic Resources for archives and literature associated with the project area. This included site forms from the • Master Site File in Tallahassee of previously recorded archaeological sites on the project parcel and within one mile of the parcel as well as reports on cultural resource assessments conducted within one mile of the project parcel(Table 2). Table 1. Literature Review Summary Previously Recorded Sites: 16 Within Project Parcel 6(8CR873,8CR874,8CR875,8CR896,8CR897,8CR898) Within One Mile of Project Parcel 10 Previous Assessments: 12 In Project Parcel 3 Within One Mile of Project Parcel 9 A review of Florida site files determined that seven previously recorded archaeological sites, 8CR873, 8CR874, 8CR875, 8CR896, 8CR897 and 8CR898 occur within the project parcel and that ten archaeological sites occur within one mile of the project parcel. There are no recorded historic structures on the parcel. Table 2. Previously Recorded Sites Summary Site No. Site Name Site Type References to S O rce of Parrcceel l Pa Parcel Site Form on File, Division of Historic 8CR726 Buschelman Black Earth Midden Resources, X Tallahassee, Florida 8CR747 Lely#1 Black Earth Midden Carr and Steele, X 1993 8CR749 Lely#3 Black Earth Midden Carr and Steele, X 1993 8CR750 Lely#5 Black Earth Midden Carr and Steele, X 1993 8CR751 Lely#4 Black Earth Midden Carr and Steele, X 1993 8CR752 Lely#6 Black Earth Midden Carr and Steele, X 1993 8CR873 Northwest Rattlesnake Black Earth Midden Beriault,2003b X Hammock 8CR874 Rockedge Midden Black Earth Midden Berlault,2003b X 8CR875 Hamelia Midden Black Earth Midden Berlault,2003b X 8CR881 Jump Start Hammock Black Earth Midden Beriault,2004a X 8CR896 Newton Square Ridge Black Earth Midden Berlault 200411 X 8CR897 Newton Square Ridge Black Earth Midden Berlault,2004b X #2 8CR898 Newton Hammock Black Earth Midden Berlault,2004b X 12 8CR1164 Poison Ivy Black Earth Midden Carr and X Mankowski,2011 8CR1165 Gemini Black Earth Midden Carr and X Mankowski,2011 8CR1166 Gumbo Limbo Island Black Earth Midden Carr and X Mankowskl,2011 A review of the state files indicates that twelve cultural resource assessments were conducted within one mile of the project parcel(Table 3). Table 3. Previous Cultural Resource Assessments' Date Survey Author Title In Out of Number Parcel Parcel 1986 1108 Florida Preservation Historical/Architectural Survey of Collier County, X Services Florida 1993 9772 Carr,Robert S.and An Archaeological Survey and Assessment of the X Steele,Willard Lely Resort Property,Collier County,Florida 1999 7248 Beriault,John G. An Archaeological Survey of the Winding Cypress X Project,Collier County,Florida A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the Collier 2003a 9380 Beriault,John G. Regional medical Center Parcel, Collier County, X Florida 2003b 9393 Beriault,John G. A Phase 1 Archaeological Assessment of the Newton X PUD Parcel,Collier County,Florida 2004a 9698 Beriault,John G. A Phase 1 Archaeological Assessment of the X Feathers Parcel,Collier County,Florida 2004b 14174 Beriault,John G. A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the Newton X Square Parcel,Collier County,Florida Toll- 2005 13377 Beriault,John G. A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the Toll- X Rattlesnake Parcel,Collier County,Florida A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the Collier 2006 12980 Beriault,John G. Boulevard, CR 951 Road Corridor Interstate 75 to X U.S.41,Collier County,Florida Carr,Robert S and A Phase 1 Cultural Resources assessment of the 2011 20097 Mankowski,Joseph F. Hacienda Lakes Project Parcels and Phase II X Assessment of CR1164,Collier County,Florida Beriault,John G.,Carr, A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment of the 2012 19475 Robert S.and Fenno, Lord's Way 30 Parcel,Collier County,Florida X Matthew Note: 'Based on assessments within one mile of the survey area 13 CULTURAL SUMMARY Stirling was the first to distinguish the indigenous prehistoric cultures of southern Florida in 1936 by defining a Glades cultural area, including all of south Florida (Stirling 1936, Carr et al. 1994b:9; Milanich, 1994:5-6). Griffin (1988) pointed out that this was not formulated as a strict cultural area, but it was rather a geographic region with some common cultural traits. Kroeber (1939), in a review of North American prehistory, utilized a slightly different term, the "South Florida Area," basing his definition on both environmental and cultural factors. Subsequently Goggin delineated more particular boundaries for southern Florida and divided the region into three sub-areas: "Okeechobee" around Lake Okeechobee, "Tekesta" for southeast Florida and the Florida Keys, and "Calusa" for Southwest Florida (Carr and Beriault 1984, Goggin 1947:114- 127). Following Goggin's study, subsequent researchers have revised the cultural distinctions attributed to southern Florida's prehistoric populations. There has been criticism that Goggin's names and definitions were based on historic accounts of the main (proto) historic groups found in the respective regions and not on the archaeological evidence of spatial, temporal, and cultural differences (Sears 1966, Griffin 1974, Carr and Beriault 1984). Griffin, in particular, questioned the distinctions. He believed that South Florida cultures varied only by local environmental conditions and ceramic exchange rates. Griffin believed the inhabitants of prehistoric southern Florida were mainly dwelling on the coast and that the interior was nearly uninhabited and under-utilized. Griffin designated the entire southern Florida region as the "Circum-Glades" area (Griffin 1974:342-346). This new designation for the area was furthered by a widely circulated book on Florida archaeology by Milanich and Fairbanks (1980). Griffin later (1988) retreated to some extent from his earlier position as further research (particularly by Ehrenhard et al. in the Big Cypress and Can in the eastern Everglades in the 1970s and 1980s) showed abundant sites in the interior Everglades. Carr and Beriault (1984), in particular, have taken issue with the concept of a singular Circum-Glades region. Carr's research in the Big Cypress and Everglades and his subsequent analysis demonstrating variation of key cultural markers (particularly in decorated ceramics) formed the basis for this contention. There is abundant evidence for cultural (and probably political or tribal) diversity in the various areas of south Florida. Can and Beriault particularly noted and defined differences between the lower southwest Florida coast, which they termed the "Ten Thousand Island" region, and the area to the north,which they called the "Caloosahatchee"region. This latter area they believed to be the seat of the historic Calusa chiefdomship, although previous (and some subsequent) researchers have called the entire southwest Florida from Cape Sable to the Cape Haze peninsula(and beyond) in Charlotte County"Calusa." Griffin, in his definitive 1988 synthesis on Everglades archaeology, attempted to reconcile and refine some of the conflict in the definition of south Florida prehistoric and historic culture areas. As stated by Carr and colleagues (1994b), "the issue...appears in part to be one of trying to determine the significance of regional and temporal variation, 15 rather than whether these differences are real." There is evidence that changes through time in regional political affiliations or realties makes any model not addressing this complex issue two-dimensional. The Calusa hegemony that was in place by the time of the arrival of Europeans may have begun as early as 800 AD in the Ten Thousand Island "district" or area (Griffin 1988:321; Carr et al. 1994b:12). There is currently ongoing research to further refine present thought as to cultural affiliations in south Florida. It would seem only a matter of time before new directions and emphases provide a more accurate summation of south Florida cultural affinities. Using the present models, the coastal zones of Collier County and southern Lee County contain three distinct culture areas. Indian Hill on Marco Island lies thirty miles from the projected interface by Carr and Beriault (1984) of the Caloosahatchee area (called the "the `heartland' of the Calusa," Carr et al. 19946:12)to the north, and the Ten Thousand Islands area to the south. At a yet undefined point to the east lies the Okeechobee cultural area, but the boundary, if it is a definite,fixed one, is likely to occur in the vicinity of the lmmokalee rise forty miles or more to the northeast of Indian Hill. Further work is in progress by Carr to address the issue of where the southwest boundaries of the Okeechobee culture area occur. TEMPORAL PERIODS The following information is generalized and abbreviated. The dates are approximate; transitions between periods more gradual than as expressed for convenience. PALED PERIOD (14,000 - 8,500 BP) During the Paleo Period, Native Americans began moving into the southeastern portion of North America into Florida. Most evidence of their presence in Florida can be reliably dated to about 10,000 BP. There are no known Paleoindian sites in Collier County. Several are documented from elsewhere in south Florida, including Warm Mineral Springs and Little Salt Springs in Sarasota County (Clausen and Gifford 1975), Harney Flats in Hillsborough County (Daniel and Wisenbaker 1987) and the Cutler Fossil Site in Dade County (Carr 1986, 2012). During this period, the terminal Wisconsian ice age, the climate was probably less extreme, with cooler summers and warmer winters. The climate was also drier, and sea levels were lower(Carbone 1983, Carr 1986,Griffin 1988). One reason that possible Paleo period sites have not been discovered in Collier and Lee Counties is that the shoreline may have been as much as 100 miles further west due to lower sea levels. Drier conditions may have made the interior very inhospitable, and the shallow estuarine and littoral sites that existed were flooded by post-ice age Holocene sea rises. Any possible interior sites from the Paleo Period may be unrecognizable due to lack of diagnostic artifacts, low population density, and few permanent camps. These and other 16 factors may help explain the absence to date of identifiable Paleo period sites in Collier and Lee Counties. ARCHAIC PERIOD (8,500- 2,500 BP) The Archaic period reflects a post-Pleistocene shift in adaptation marked by an increase in the seasonal exploitation of a broad spectrum of food resources, a more restricted use of territory due to regional specialization, and more semi-sedentary habitation sites. No ceramics are known until the Late Archaic. During the Archaic, regional specializations became more marked, not only with material culture but also with distinct local utilization of local plant and animal resources. As mentioned above, there is, as yet, no firm evidence of human presence in southwest Florida during the Paleo period. This apparently is also true for the Early Archaic (8500- 7000BP), as there is evidence of an environment too arid to support scrub oak, and the presence of shifting wind formed dunes (Watts 1975, Widmer 1983). No early Archaic sites are known from southwest Florida. By about 6500 BP mesic conditions began to spread, although localized xeric conditions continued (and still exist in some areas) through south Florida. Middle Archaic sites dating from this time are rare, although the Bay West Nursery site (8CR200) in Collier County and the Ryder Pond site (8LL1850) in Lee County near Bonita Springs provide evidence of occupation, as do several sites in southeast Florida. The Bay West site is a Middle Archaic cypress pond cemetery, associated with a lithic scatter. The Ryder Pond site is a similar mortuary pond site surrounded by pine flatwoods (Carr and Heinz 1996). Beriault has also recorded several aceramic shell scatters in coastal sand hills (paleo dunes), some of which may date to the Middle Archaic. Griffin (1988) summarizes evidence indicating that despite the rise of available surface water, brackish estuaries and other major modern landscape features had not formed, and population (or repopulation) was still sparse. During the Archaic period sea levels began to rise at a fairly rapid rate, estimated at 8.3 cm. per 100 years 6000-3000 BP, and 3.5 cm per 100 years afterwards (Scholl et al. 1969), although whether sea levels were steadily rising or oscillating is still unclear (see Griffin 1988 for recent reviews of the literature).Data is somewhat difficult to sort out as sea level rise was accompanied by both shore regression and transgression in places. As conditions became wetter (and warmer) in the interior, cypress swamps and hardwood sub-tropical forests established themselves by about 5000 BP (Carbone 1983, Delcourt and Delcourt 1981). By late Middle or early Late Archaic times (4000 years BP) there were significant shell mounds and middens on Horrs Island,Marco Island,and elsewhere in the coastal regions, suggesting that the estuary system had been established and was being utilized to provide the subsistence basis for denser populations and semi-sedentary settlements (Morrell 1969). At Useppa Island in Lee County, excavations have provided radiocarbon dates from pre-ceramic shell middens ranging between roughly 4900 BP and 5600 BP, suggesting that the Middle Archaic as well as Late Archaic periods saw a growing 17 dependence on shellfish resources(Milanich et al. 1984). There are aceramic coastal sand hill and interior wetland sites as well,but these have not been demonstrated to be Archaic despite some investigators equating aceramic with preceramic. Radiocarbon dates for these sites would clarify this point. Carr points out that if the wet tree islands were initially used by Archaic people, then at least some of the hardwood hammocks in swamp environments were of higher elevation (with subsequent changes in vegetation) due to human activities. Post-Archaic people extensively utilized these hammocks and continued to advance their development as distinct geomorphic features. This is obviously an area where additional archaeological investigations have a potential to contribute to understanding the interaction of geomorphic and cultural evolution in southwest Florida. Toward the end of the Archaic fiber-tempered pottery appears in southwest Florida, often used as a marker of the Orange Phase, commencing at about 4000 BP, either coincident with or soon after the development of the extensive shell middens. The Late Archaic Orange Phase subsistence strategy is characterized by intensive use of shellfish and marine resources, as well as being marked by an accelerated trend toward regional specializations. A number of the large shell middens on Marco Island (Cockrell 1970), Horrs Island (Russo n.d.), Cape Haze (Bullen and Sullen 1956), and elsewhere date from this period or earlier, as they contain fiber-tempered ceramics, although there are known aceramic (preceramic?) levels below the Orange Phase deposits that may date to the Middle Archaic. These shell middens are usually capped by deposits from later occupations as well. A Late Archaic horizon was recently discovered at the Argo Manatee site on Henderson Creek located four miles south of the project parcel (Carr et al. 2114). FORMATIVE STAGE OR GLADES PERIODS (2500 BP - 500 BP) The Formative or Glades adaptation, based on hunting, fishing, and the harvesting of shellfish and plants, was similar to the Archaic, but was characterized by increasing specializations in gathering strategies and tool-making. Earlier writers have typed this hunter-gatherer society as primitive or "low-level" (Kroeber 1939). However, there is certainly evidence from the specialization of tools, from the beautifully-executed wood carvings from Key Marco in Collier County and those from Fort Center near Lake Okeechobee (Cushing 1897, Sears 1982), and from the historic accounts of the Calusa hegemony, that the south Florida area had an advanced culture that Goggin (1964) has called a"stratified non-agrarian society." The preceding Late Archaic late Orange phase(also known as the transitional phase)was marked by changes in pottery, and terminated with the relatively rapid replacement of fiber-tempered pottery with sand-tempered, limestone-tempered, and chalky "temperless" pottery. It was also characterized by changes in ceramic style and often by reduction in the size of stone projectile points. 18 The Formative Stage (beginning about 2500 BP) is divided in south Florida into the Glades Periods sequence. Subsistence adaptation is marked by a narrowing spectrum of resource use, as well as continued trends toward regional diversity and ecological specializations, marked in part by the proliferation of inland resource extraction encampments. Formative Period cultural evolution eventually led to increased political sophistication, perhaps initially of modest dimensions, but culminating in broad regional political alliances and regulation of materials and goods (i.e. resources) between the coast and inland areas (Milanich and Fairbanks 1980). By protohistoric and contact times the Calusa were the dominant tribal group, gaining broad political influence and at least partial control over much of south Florida as far north as central Brevard County. Historically, the main Calusa village has been regarded as "Calos" on Mound Key in Estero Bay in Lee County, although 50 to 70 large villages were under direct Calusa control by contact times(Griffin 1988). During the Formative Periods, village sites grew to the proportions of large multi-use complexes,particularly along the coast and barrier islands of southwest Florida. Some of the projected intra-site functions of the elements of these complex shellworks were as temples, canals, causeways, temple and platform mounds, courtyards and watercourts. Current research involving the excavating of large contiguous areas of these shell mound complexes is beginning to establish demonstrable uses for the features of these large sites,upon which heretofore were merely speculated(Widmer 1996). Tidal estuary rivers and inland hammocks along deep water sloughs, marshes, and permanent ponds were seasonally visited for extraction of natural resources, and are now marked by small to relatively large black dirt middens, some of which may have been semi-permanent hamlets. The pine and cypress flatwoods appear to have supported few sites, although areas around Lake Trafford and other rich interior areas developed substantial sites, including sand mounds, and may be more similar to the Okeechobee cultural area than to the coastal cultures. In 1992, Dickel and Carr excavated a Deptford Period burial mound(the Oak Knoll Site) in the Bonita Bay Tract north of the Imperial River. Exotic trade items and seventy or more human burials were among the material findings. The resulting conclusions and subsequent surveying and testing of the Bonita Bay Shell works (8LL717) suggest social stratification and complexity may extend further back into the past than the Formative period(Dickel and Carr 1992). Coastal sites (shell middens)reflect a predominate dependence on fish and shellfish,wild plant foods and products, and larger inland game. The inland sites show a greater reliance on interior resources, including large, medium and small mammals, turtle, small freshwater fish, alligator, snake, frogs, and, sometimes, freshwater shellfish. Interior and coastal resource exchange can be documented by the consistent finds of moderate amounts of marine shell in many interior middens, as well as interior resources in coastal middens. 19 The Formative Stage (with a nod to Goggin) has been often termed the Glades cultural tradition. Much of this "tradition" is focused on decorated ceramics, the minority in the archaeological record, although the majority of recovered (rim) sherds are plainware. However, despite this, pottery (and its decorations) is usually utilized as the major temporal marker(s)for fitting sites into a temporal framework. Changes in pottery do not represent mere changes in artistic motifs, but reflect inter- and intra-regional trade contacts and outside cultural influences (possibly through exogamy, shifting of populations, and even the through evolution of a culture through time). Whatever the influences,the Glades tradition is continuous from post-Archaic times to contact times. Despite the fact that exogamy is likely to have been practiced, traders or other specialists probably moved between major cultural areas in small numbers, and genetic flow probably accompanied cultural exchange, although perhaps not on the same scale. This may have increased in later times due to use of traditional obligations of kinship and intermarriage to stabilize alliances that were not codified into a formal legal system. The following table has been modified from several sources, but it is predominantly based on Milanich and Fairbanks (1980), Griffin (1988), and Allerton and Carr (1990). Dates have been rounded somewhat and translated to Before Present (BP). There are some differences of opinion in the dates, particularly about the timing of the Glades Ia and lb division. Table 1: Glades Cultural Sequence Glades Ia(2500 BP- 1500 BP) Appearance of sand tempered plain pottery, but little else to mark a difference and the preceding Late Archaic. Sand tempered plain remains a predominate type throughout the Glades sequence. Glades Ib(1500 BP- 1250 BP) Appearance of decorated sand-tempered ceramic (Ft. Drum Incised,Ft. Drum Punctated, Cane Patch Incised, Turner River Punctate), plainware common. Pottery rim grooving and incision decorations become widespread. Glades IIa(1250 BP- 1100 BP) Appearance of Key Largo Incised, Sanibel Incised, Miami Incised, and plainware is common. Distinction between ceramics of southeast and southwest Florida becomes apparent. Ten Thousand Island area distinct from Caloosahatchee area. First mound construction- increased social stratification? Population size may have approximated that at contact. Glades IIb(1100 - 1000 BP) Appearance of Matecumbe Incised; Key Largo Incised common on east coast, Gordon's Pass 20 Incised common on the west, and plainware common throughout. Glades [Ic(1000 BP- 800 BP) Appearance of Plantation Pinched, but few - decorated wares with a preponderance of plainware (there is some evidence of population reduction- perhaps due to a cataclysmic event). Non-local pottery (e.g. St. Johns Plain and Check Stamped, Belle Glade Plain)appears. Glades IIIa(800-600 BP) Appearance of Surfside Incised, increasing quantities of St. Johns pottery (especially on East Coast),and Belle Glade pottery. Glades IIIb(600 BP- 500 BP) Glades Tooled rims appear (rare on West Coast), zoned punctate designs, but general decline in incised decoration. Belle Glade ceramics common on west coast. St. Johns ware present but rare on West Coast,common on East Coast. Glades IIIc(500 BP -300 BP) Continuation of IIIb ceramics, with pronounced flaring of rims and embossing on Glades Tooled ceramics. Mound burial construction less common with intrusive burials into existing mounds, appearance of European goods,plainware common. HISTORICAL PERIOD By European contact times (the first half of the 16th century), the southwest coast of Florida was maintaining a vigorous, expanding political chiefdom with a broad network of alliances, as well as a rich and ancient cultural tradition without an agricultural base. However, direct conflict with Europeans and, more importantly, exposure to European diseases led to the rapid decline of the Calusa. By the mid 1700s their numbers had greatly diminished. The remnants of this once-powerful tribe may have left south Florida in the 1760s with the Spanish for relocation in Cuba. Others may have become indistinguishable from Spanish Cuban fishermen who worked the fishing "ranchos" in Pine Island Sound catching and salting fish for export to Cuba. Other groups may have merged with the Creek-derived Seminoles. In the late 1700s, members of the Creek tribe were forced into Florida from Georgia and Alabama. They were later called Seminoles, possibly derived from the Spanish term "cimmarones." Expanding settlements and new homesteads by Anglo-Europeans forced Native Americans into the Big Cypress and Everglades by the 1830s. By this time, most of the cultural identity of pre-contact tribes had been lost, although some of the Calusa subsistence strategies may have been partly adopted by Seminoles. A number of Seminole period sites have been documented on prehistoric Glades middens. This 21 association may in part reflect the paucity of high land in the interior (Ehrenhard et al. 1978, Ehrenhard and Taylor 1980. Midden sites were often the foci for historic Seminole gardens and fruit groves. Seminole periods in south Florida are divided into I (1820-1860), II (1860-1900) and III (1900-1940) (Ehrenhard et al. 1978). Post-1940 Seminole camps are designated "Late Seminole" in some reports. These designations reflect the different stages of Seminole migration into south Florida, Seminole displacement and active conflict with the expanding American culture, and the eventual refuge by Seminole remnants in Big Cypress and Everglades regions. The advent of the Second and Third Seminole Wars (1834-38, 1855-58) disrupted the peaceful settlement of the Southwest Florida region. There were several forts, "temporary" and permanent, established along the Caloosahatchee River during this time. Fort Dulaney was established at Punta Rassa near the mouth of the Caloosahatchee in 1837 and was occupied intermittently through 1841, and again in 1855. After a hurricane destroyed Ft. Dulaney in 1841, Fort Harvie was established upriver. The name of this fort was changed in 1850 by its commander General Twiggs to honor his new son-in-law, Col. Abraham Myers. Fort Myers was thus created, and became the chief fort of the region. From this central administrative point, a line of forts was established up the Caloosahatchee River. They were: Fort Denaud, Fort Adams, Fort Thompson, and Fort Center on Fisheating Creek leading into Lake Okeechobee. Other forts and "temporary depots" were established south into the Big Cypress Swamp such as Fort Simon Drum, Temporary Depot Number One, Fort Doane, Fort Simmons, Fort Keis, Fort Foster, Fort Shackleford,and others. Rattlesnake Hammock Area History The Rattlesnake Hammock area has always attracted human activity, from prehistoric to historic times. There is evidence from military maps of the Seminole Wars period that several Seminole villages and encampments were in the general area of the hammock. By the 1880s, various white settlers and homesteaders such as the Whiddens, Carrolls, Smiths, and Kirklands had settled the area of Henderson Creek immediately south of Rattlesnake Hammock. These early settlers farmed the Henderson Creek area and hunted up into Rattlesnake Hammock. Various early sportsmen visiting or wintering in Naples took oxcart trips into the Rattlesnake Hammock area to hunt. The advent of the Tamiami Trail in the late 1920s further opened access to the area. The completion of the Atlantic Coastline Railway by 1928 also enabled logging of pine and cypress in the Belle Meade area south of Rattlesnake Hammock. State Road 951 was built in the late 1950s/early 1960s and opened up Rattlesnake Hammock to development by landholders. The Sabal Palm Road community was created during that time period. Landscaping demands in the rapidly-developing Naples area caused early residents such as the Langford family and "Monkey" Hunter to dig and transport cabbage palms from the hammock. Other individuals such as Seth and Buster Johns harvested cypress trees for their sawmill on Johns Road near the project parcel. 22 In the early 1980s, a Naples area tradition, the Swamp Buggy Races, was moved from a locale it had occupied since 1953 on Radio Road to a larger modern facility at the newly created Florida Sports Park east of the intersection of Rattlesnake Hammock Road and CR951. This venue comprised a series of races by "classes" of homemade off-road vehicles, generally utilizing outsized tires and custom made chassis called "swamp buggies". The first swamp buggy was reputed to have been created by Ed Frank Sr. of Naples in the 1920s with the original purpose of using the vehicle for hunting. Formal races the week prior to hunting season were first held in the late 1940s at a marsh called Newman's Pond slightly north of downtown Naples. The present-day Races continue this local tradition and feature ever more powerful and creative machines driven by drivers who are now members of an association and featured on various television Sports Channels. 23 METHODOLOGY Prior to conducting fieldwork in the project parcel, relevant archives and literature were reviewed. This included, but was not limited to, previous archaeological reports for sites in Collier County, reviewing information from the Master Site File in Tallahassee concerning nearby sites, and examining USGS maps of the project area. Also, vintage black and white as well as color aerial photographs of the project area that could aid in revealing anthropogenic changes to the topography and floral communities were interpreted. RESEARCH DESIGN The research design for the cultural resource assessment of the Rockedge parcel had two main field objectives, each with a distinct research design. The first objective was to locate and assess any cultural resources within the expanded "addendum" parcel and the second was to test select areas of the original parcel that were innaccessible during previous cultural resource assessments due to seasonal flooding. A predictive model based on topographic and vegetative attributes that are associated with prehistoric and historic sites in Collier County was used to determine the probability for archaeological sites. This model postulates that live oak, tropical hardwood, and cabbage palm hammocks in close proximity to sloughs, marshes, creeks, and rivers are medium to high probability areas for archaeological sites. Elevation information from the USGS quadrangle map for the area was also used. Based on a review of aerial photographs, a number of targets were determined to be of medium to high probability. All other areas were determined to have low probability. FIELDWORK Low probability areas were systematically excavated at 100 meter intervals along fifteen transects oriented north-south and east-west. Shovel tests were excavated in medium to high probability areas at 10 to 20 meter intervals. Determination of medium to high probability areas were based on a review of historic aerial photographs and environmental factors such as increased elevation, oak, cabbage palm, or tropical hardwood hammock vegetation, and high/exposed bedrock. If cultural deposits were encountered in a shovel test, additional shovel tests were placed at 10 meter intervals in each cardinal direction unless impeded by marshes or inundation. All shovel tests were 50 cm in diameter and excavated to at least 100 cm below surface or until reaching limestone bedrock, whichever came first. All soils were screened through 1/4"wire mesh and all cultural materials collected. Shovel test locations were recorded with a global positioning systems using a hand-held Trimble and cell phone apps when possible or were physically marked on existing site and project area maps. All information was recorded on shovel test forms by the excavators. Photographs documenting select shovel tests, significant features, and the general landscape of the project area were taken with a digital camera. Field notes were 24 recorded in a weatherproof notebook. Shovel tests were refilled upon completion. Site boundaries were determined based on the extent of positive shovel tests and topographic and hydrological variables. For example, sites were bounded by their upland boundary to adjacent wetlands. COLLECTIONS All cultural materials recovered were bagged in sealable plastic bag, labeled with the provenience information, and issued a field specimen number(FS#). 25 SUMMARY OF SITES Site Name: Buschelman(eastern component) State Site Number: 8CR726 Environmental Setting: Climax live oak hammock adjacent to a cypress slough to the east Location: Range 26E,Township 50S, Section 23 Site Type: Black earth midden Site Function: Habitation,resource extraction Description: This eastern component of CR726 is a disturbed and marginal cultural deposit occurring within an oak hammock abutting Collier Boulevard (County Road 951). In previous assessments two positive shovel tests were dug. During this assessment nine shovel tests were dug in the least disturbed areas of the hammock. No additional archaeological material was found. In 2003 a single positive test within a root ball yielded sand-tempered plain pottery. Chronology: Prehistoric: Glades Period Collections: Sand-tempered plain ceramics(FS 4—Beriault 2003b) Previous Research: Buschelman 1992, Can and Steele 1993, Beriault 2004 Preservation Quality: Poor: this site area has been bulldozed and cleared, removing and redepositing cultural material. Ownership: Private Significance: This component of the Buschelman Site is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. Preservation Status: The site is within an area proposed for development. 27 52 Meg 259 1 264 • CYPRESS SWAMP 261 0 • 53 2 262 65 2 9 8 0 263 0 54 0 264 55 • 56 Figure 9.Aerial photograph of the Busehelman Site,Eastern Component, 8CR726 with shovel tests. • =POSITIVE SHOVEL TEST,DISTURBED 0 =NEGATIVE SHOVEL TEST 11111111111111•1111 N 0 16 33 66 Feet approx. 0 5 FINISHED MA?SY JOHN G,9ER!AULT 8-19.14 1 d 20 Meters approx. 28 ta. �, !� , s t , ate. � � � �.. �, '� Figure 10.Positive shovel test 8 was excavated at base of a pedestalled live oak immediate Left(west}of bulldozed area of CR726(east component}in August,2003. r - t d p E° J '''':'''I''"'''-' ' �SM'" � Figure i i. View north of the eastern component of the B' uschelman Site, 8CR726, in August,2003. 29 Site Name: Northwest Rattlesnake Hammock Midden State Site Number: SCR873 Environmental Setting: Tropical hardwood hammock adjoining transverse slough to west Location: Range 26E,Township 50S, Section 23 Site Type: Faunal bone scatter Site Function: Habitation,resource extraction Description: The site is characterized by a sparse, patchy scatter of faunal bone located near the edge of a linear slough feature in a tropical hardwood hammock with a near-surface limestone caprock substrate. Systematic testing in 2003 resulted in two positive tests both with small quantities of faunal bone.Testing in 2004 uncovered redeposited midden in the vicinity but no additional intact deposits. However, this cultural deposit may be a satellite activity area for either the Rockedge or Hamelia middens (CR874 and CR875)that are to the east of CR873. Chronology: Prehistoric: period unknown Collections: Faunal bone(FS 1, 18—Beriault 2003) Previous Research: Beriault 2003b Preservation Quality: Good to excellent: site area is in an uncleared hammock Ownership: Private Significance: The site is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places based on available data. Preservation Status: The site is within the proposed preservation area. 30 Site Name: Rockedge Midden State Site Number: 8CR874 Environmental Setting: Tropical hardwood hammock adjacent to large cypress pond to the south and east. Location: Range 26E,Township 50S, Section 23 Site Type: Black earth midden Site Function: Habitation,resource extraction Description: The site is characterized as a black earth midden containing archaeological deposits as much as 70 cm thick located in an elevated hammock adjoining a deep slough to the east. The site measures about 100 meters east to west near its southern boundary and 75 meters north to south. The site has had significant disturbances as a result of being bulldozed prior to 2003 (see Figure 11 to see cleared area). Artifacts include pottery sherds, marine shell, and faunal bone. One sherd of Gordon's Pass Incised pottery indicates a Glades IIb(1100-1000 BP) occupation. Chronology: Prehistoric: Glades IIb Collections: Faunal bone, ceramics, marine shell (FS 2, 20-27—Beriault 2003b;FS 31 —42, 2014) Previous Research: Beriault 2003b Preservation Quality: Good to excellent: a portion of site area is undisturbed; however, the greater portion is now redeposited within a cleared field. Ownership: Private Significance: The site is potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places based on criterion (d) for sites "that have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory." Preservation Status: The most intact portion of the site is within a proposed preservation area. 31 r iZ -- il ' 224 t • 223 34 0 248 222 33 31 37 249/ 0 220 (f) 36/ 49 1 239 238 try a v) 234 235 + :233 232 ,221, 236 48 237 `� w Cr 297 219 , 50I I 30 ,1 t P` 47 l.J 31 V 218 46 I € 32 ` 42 41 40 39 6 ' 45 219 • • �. 230 231 , 44 43 217 225 226 228 1227 • 251 214 252- 51- - ' 250 215 ` - - ~ ` iw 254 216 253 I i Figure 12. 2004 Aerial photograph of 8CR873 and 8CR874 with 2003-2014 shovel tests. •=POSITIVE SHOVEL TEST,INTACT ® =BOUNDARY OF CLEAREOAREA (4 POSITIVE,LIKELY REDEPOSITED 11 =ESTIMATED SITE BOUNDARIES 0=MINIMAL CULTURAL MATERIAL Q=MINIMAL,LIKELY REDEPOSITED N 0 100 200 300 Feet approx. 0 =NEGATIVE SHOVEL TEST 0 30 60 90 Meters approx. FIELD MAP BY ANDREW J.WEIDMAN E-14•14.FINISHED MAP BY JOHN O.BERIAULT 8-1244 32 Site Name: Hamelia Midden State Site Number: 8CR875 Environmental Setting: Tropical hardwood hammock adjacent to a cypress pond to the south and east. Location: Range 26E, Township 50S, Section 23 Site Type: Black earth midden Site Function: Habitation, resource extraction Description: The site is a dense midden deposit located about 200 feet northeast of Rockedge Midden, CR874. Cultural deposits are as thick as 40cm. The site is about 200 by 75 meters with its largest alignment extending northwest to southeast. A rim sherd of Fort Drum Incised indicates occupation in the Glades Ib (1500-1250 BP) Period. One possible human bone was recovered (shovel test 13, FS-6 — Beriault 2003b). The western and northern parts of the site have been previously cleared and likely bulldozed. The most intensive middens have had large parts previously cleared. Chronology: Prehistoric: Glades Period Collections: Faunal bone, ceramics, marine shell, (FS 3, 5-17 in 2003); faunal bone, ceramics, Busycon adze (FS 13-24, 25-30, 43- 45 in 2014) Previous Research: Beriault 2003b Preservation Quality: Fair to excellent: the eastern part of the site area is in uncleared hammock, although the northern portion is now a cleared field. Ownership: Private Significance: The site is potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places based on criterion (d) for sites "that have yielded or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory". Preservation Status: The intact portion of the site is within a proposed preservation area. 33 199 198 201 203 213 197 • - 6 202 4.. 212 173 Cl. 10, 174 211 Q 207 5 172 t!') W ', 187 U1 175 176 152 186 188 i W CC I 1..0 , 208 I >— le, U 177 210 178 ' 209 I 1 -- — -- ,.— ,.. 179 , / 28 27, 26 1 , I ,, 25 24 X 247 246 245 180 23 15 s X 14 -T^ 1 e. 181 '� 21 2 20 19 . 13, 16 18 17 , 17 , 4. 132 11 24 , 183 10 • 224 223 12 242 240 244 243 — _ je • 185 ,/ • 2.48 • 184 .. eV Figure 13. 2004 aerial photograph of the Hamelia Midden, 8CR875 with shovel tests. =POSITIVE SHOVEL TEST,INTACT NA =BOUNDARY OF CLEARED AREA =POSITIVE SHOVEL TEST,DISTURBED =ESTIMATED SITE BOUNDARY 0 'v 0-MINIMAL CULTURAL MATERIAL 0=MINIMAL,LIKELY REDEPOSITED 0 100 200 300 Feet approx. 0=NEGATIVE SHOVEL TEST 0 30 60 90 Meters approx. FIELD MAP BY ANDREW J.WEIDMAN E-14.14,FINISHED MAP 8Y JOHN 0-BERIAULT 8-13-14 34 Site Name: Newton Square Ridge#1 State Site Number: 8CR896 Environmental Setting: Tropical hardwood hammock ridge adjacent to marshy sloughs to north and south. Location: Range 26E,Township 50S, Section 23 Site Type: Midden Site Function: Habitation, resource extraction Description: This site is characterized by an elevated hammock ridge running slightly NW/SE on its long axis. The black dirt is shallow averaging about 30 cm deep. The site occurs on the high ground portion of the ridge for an area of 250 feet, north-south, by 50 to 80 feet east-west. Only faunal bone was recovered. The site (discovered in 2004) may be part of the Rockedge site, CR875 (see Figure 13). The site was not retested during this assessment. Chronology: Prehistoric:Glades Period Collections: Faunal bone(FS 7, 8--Beriault 2004b) -Previous Research: Beriault 2004b Preservation Quality: Good to excellent,the site area is in uncleared hammock Ownership: Private Significance: The site is potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion (d), sites "that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history." Preservation Status: The site is within a proposed preservation area. 35 Site Name: Newton Square Ridge#2 State Site Number: 8CR897 Environmental Setting: Tropical hardwood hammock adjacent to transverse slough south and east. Location: Range 26E,Township 50S, Section 23 Site Type: Midden Site Function: Habitation,resource extraction Description: This site is characterized by a midden deposit situated on a small, narrow elevated ridge immediately north of a deep marsh/willow pond area near the central portion of the parcel. Site orientation is roughly southeast-northwest on its long axis. Shovel tests placed at either end of the ridge in 2004 were positive. This area may have been a processing area for animals collected in the marsh to the south. Material recovered was primarily faunal bone. The ridge averages 30 feet wide by 100 feet long. Chronology: Prehistoric: Glades Period Collections: Faunal bone(FS 4, 5—Beriault 2004b) Previous Research: Beriault 2004b Preservation Quality: Good to excellent, a portion of site area is in original, uncleared hammock, the greater portion is now a cleared field Ownership: Private Significance: The site is potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion (d), sites "that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history." Preservation Status: The site is within a proposed preservation area. 36 Site Name: Newton Hammock State Site Number: 8CR898 Environmental Setting: Tropical hardwood hammock adjacent to marsh/slough to northwest Location: Range 26E,Township 50S, Section 23 Site Type: Black earth midden Site Function: Habitation,resource extraction Description: This site is characterized by a midden deposit situated on a hardwood hammock located southeast of a large circular willow marsh/slough in the extreme southeast corner of the project parcel. A moderate amount of faunal bone was recovered from shovel tests. The site area is approximately 100 feet east-west by 50 feet north-south. It is likely that this site extends into the adjoining properties to the south and east. Chronology: Prehistoric: late Archaic to Glades periods Collections: Faunal bone(FS 5—Beriault 2004b) Previous Research: Beriault 2004b Preservation Quality: Good Ownership: Private Significance: The site is potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places under Criterion (d), sites "that have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history." Preservation Status: The site is located within a proposed preservation area. 37 • 156 • 207 CYPRESS SWAMP 164 5 165 158 157 0163 •62 161 160 159 •z • Figure 14.Aerial photograph of Newton Hammock, 8CR898,with shovel tests, in preservation area. ESTIMATED SITE BOUNDARY =POSITIVE SHOVEL TEST,INTACT 0 =MINIMAL CULTURAL MATERIAL smoom■ Q =NEGATIVE SHOVEL TEST 0 16 33 66 Feet approx, 0 5 10 20 Meters approx. FIELD MAP BY ANDREW J.WEIDMAN 6-14-14,FINISHED MAP BY JOHN 6,BERIAULT 6-29-14 38 Site Name: Rockedge#2 State Site Number: 8CR l 371 Environmental Setting: Cabbage palm/oak hammock Location: Range 26E,Township 50S, Section 23 Site Type: Black earth midden Site Function: Habitation, resource extraction Description: This black earth midden is largely characterized by redeposited and disturbed cultural deposits. The site was discovered during this assessment. The site encompasses an area of approximately 37 meters east-west by 37 meters north-south. Cultural deposits occur from 20 to 40cm below surface. A total of 31 tests were dug across the site of which nine were positive for prehistoric material. Only three test holes encountered undisturbed cultural deposits (ST 271,272, 278). Chronology: Prehistoric: Glades periods Collections: Faunal bone,pottery sherds(FS 1-5, 47-50) Previous Research: None Preservation Quality: Fair: the site has been bulldozed and largely disturbed by previous house construction and nursery activity (now demolished). One area on the west has intact cultural deposits. Ownership: Private Significance: Most of the site is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places because of extensive disturbance; however, an area in the western central part of the site is intact and potentially eligible for listing. Preservation Status: The site is within an area proposed for development. 39 t l 115 -i I 3> fi 114 4 , 113 i I 112 256 255 '111 ' a a / Ia $ _. 1 1 ,� I 258 257 280 _ _ _ 278 110 , 1Y � � i 1 �� ` 279 276 277 271 109 1 0 ■ � 273 272 1 274 275 � ."�,� 3 1 104 101 a a ,V ., 106 105 107 108 $102 •103 q Figure 15.Aerial photograph of Rockedge#2 Midden, 8CR1371,with shovel tests. =POSITIVE SHOVEL TEST,INTACT 4 =POSITIVE SHOVEL TEST,DISTURBED MINIMAL SHOVEL TEST,LIKELY REDEPOSITED N u=NEGATIVE SHOVEL TEST 0 33 6 132 Feet approx. MI=ESTIMATED SITE BOUNDARY 0 10 20 40 Meters approx. FIELD MAP DY ANDREW J.INEIOMAN 6-14-14,FINISHED MAP DV JOHN G.DERIAULT 4-29-14 40 Site Name: Rockedge#3 State Site Number: 8CR1372 Environmental Setting: Tropical hardwood hammock adjacent to cypress pond Location: Range 26E,Township 50S, Section 23 Site Type: Faunal bone midden Site Function: Habitation,resource extraction Description: This site is characterized by faunal bone midden situated on a small, shallow soil hammock located immediately east of a cypress pond. Site orientation is roughly east-west on its long axis. Three shovel tests were positive. Material recovered was primarily faunal bone. The site averages 20 meters wide by 30 meters long. The site has been disturbed by a quarry operation that has removed much of the soil (Figure 15). Chronology: Prehistoric: Glades periods Collections: Faunal bone(FS 51-53) Previous Research: None Preservation Quality: Poor: a small portion of the site area is in uncleared hammock but a large borrow pit occurs across the middle of the site(Figure 16). Ownership: Private Significance: The site is not eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places based on available data. Preservation Status: The site is within an area proposed for development. 41 '44t pr is 286 303 285 302 294 293 282 287 288 289 301 300 290' " 304 291 305 292 ID 2014 Google Figure 16. 2014 aerial photograph of Rockedge#3 Midden, 8CR1372,with shovel tests. 0 =MINIMAL CULTURAL MATERIAL 0 =NEGATIVE SHOVEL TEST monwme =ESTIMATED SITE BOUNDARY 5 0 2 25 50 100 Feet approx. FINISH.PD MAP BY T'M HARRINOTON&8.1{ 0 7-5 15 30 Meters approx. 42 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RESULTS A cultural resource assessment of the Rockedge parcel resulted in the documentation of nine prehistoric sites(CR726, CR873, CR874,CR875, CR896, CR897, CR898, CR1371, CR1372). Of these sites, seven were previously recorded and two sites (CR1371 and CR1372)were discovered as a result of this assessment. A search for historic sites such as a logging tram, elevated tramway, or road bed as indicated on the Copeland map(Figure 3) did not result in finding any visible site. A summary of documented sites on the project parcel is provided below. CR726 The Buschelman site, eastern component, is located in an area of cleared oak hammock. Most of the site had been previously bulldozed in the 1980s, except for soils directly below several trees that had been avoided during the clearing. Cultural material was minimal, and only two shovel tests directly below oak trees resulted in a small quantity of potsherds. The site is not regarded as eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. CR873 This sparse faunal bone midden was located in 2003. It is likely related to CR874 and/or CR875. Cultural material was minimal. Based on available data, the site is not regarded as eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. CR874 This is a large, black earth midden with copious deposits of cultural material. The site borders a large, marshy pond on its east. The northern part of the site has been cleared. Shovel tests uncovered prehistoric pottery sherds, faunal bone, and marine shell. Artifact concentrations were highest on the southern section of the site which is situated on a slight limestone elevation. The northwest section of the site appeared disturbed with modern glass, nails, and plastic occurring in the same context as prehistoric artifacts indicating redeposition during clearing. The intact portions of the site are potentially eligible for listing in the National Register. CR875 This is a large, black earth midden abutting the same large, marshy pond as CR874. The western portion of the site had been previously cleared for a residential lot and grove. Shovel tests produced an assemblage of prehistoric pottery sherds, faunal materials, and marine shell. The densest concentration of artifacts (including shell hammers, fiber- 43 tempered pottery, and Sanibel Incised pottery) was located directly north of the pond. Despite disturbances, a major part of the site is intact and is located within the wetlands preservation area.The site is potentially eligible for listing in the National Register. CR 896 This is an area of faunal bone midden in a tropical hammock associated with the same large central marsh pond. The site is undisturbed and is part of a ring of cultural activity abutting the pond. The site is potentially eligible for listing in the National Register. CR 897 This site is a black earth midden abutting the large pond, part of' the ring of sites surrounding the marsh. Some of the site is intact but much of it has been previously cleared. The intact part of the site is potentially eligible for listing in the National Register,and is within the proposed preservation area. CR 898 CR898 is a black earth midden. It is a well preserved site located in a hardwood hammock on the south side of the large pond. The site is potentially eligible for listing in the National Register, and is within the proposed preservation area. CR1371 This is a large black earth midden located within a bulldozed oak hammock. A small portion of the intact midden was found (Figure 14). Based on the extent of prior disturbance and current data most of the site is not regarded as eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places; however,the smaller intact portion is likely eligible. CR1372 This is a sparse faunal bone midden disturbed by soil quarry excavations that removed a large part of the site (Figure 15). This site is not regarded as eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that a construction fence be placed around the western boundaries of sites CR874 and CR875 (or the western preservation area) where they abut areas approved for development, to protect those sites during clearing and grubbing. No fill or construction supplies or equipment should be stored on those sites, and the placement of construction fence and all ground-disturbing activities within 90 feet of these sites should be subject to monitoring by an archaeologist. 44 Monitoring by archaeologists should be conducted of ground-disturbing activities within the remnant hammock areas west of CR874 and CR875. Monitoring and additional testing (unit excavations) should be conducted of undisturbed cultural deposits encountered at CR1371. Monitoring should be conducted at CR1372. The following recommended guidelines are summarized below: • Prior to any clearing or grubbing activities within 90 feet of the site, place a temporary construction fence around the sites abutting areas of construction (it may be easier to place the fence at the western boundary of the preservation area). • Any clearing of a site to be preserved (i.e. removal of exotic vegetations) will need to be conducted by hand. No equipment should be used to clear the site or remove debris from the site area. • No fill,equipment, or supplies should stored within the site preservation area. • Any proposed landscaping of a site within the preservation area should be coordinated with the project archaeologist. Because of the size of the parcel and its thick vegetation there is a possibility that other archaeological sites or features may occur there. Both cypress solution ponds and grass marshes have the potential of yielding Archaic Period human burials as other similiar features in the area have been used as mortuary ponds (Beriault et al. 1981:57). The difficulty of adequately testing these features should be considered in the event that subsequent development uncovers archaeological resources there. If additional cultural resources are encountered during development activities then the consultant archaeologist and the Florida Division of Historic Resources should be notified. If human remains are found, then the provisions of Florida Statute 872.05 will apply. 45 p \' s £ T 1 i 1 1 rr It 111 11 :"-1 `I A 1 # i i 1" I i i W4 1 1 �a i a :a+ 1 a 0.� {. 1 i d°i f 1 40 1 ill £ ••• V I If E 1 4 a a 4 i ! a i a 4Q 01 / 4,4` r — i5 I � a (JA I � � i i sUI -1 1 - ; rl ■ NM ` I t r çr o,, 1 I E �, '!pI1: 11_I 1 L ) L.:1„.. 1 a " 4 4 4 4 Fil4 : I wffl 14u4g. L animin r r1 ■Its+;-�, 1 il It n2—_:I I a- ,y E 1 -1 A r r A 6'£ I to I EMI-771-4 1 I El 7.� fi Ar 1ah11a� a , r rr VIII r £ N J - --� :-sm i V b Figure 17. 2014 Rockedge plat plan with archaeological site delineations. ft =ARCF AEOLOGICAL.SITE(ELIGIBLE FOR NATIONAL REGISTER) MO=ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE(NOT ELIGIBLE FOR NATIONAL REGISTER) 'A,yW =PROPOSED WETLAND PRESERVE *Z 46 REFERENCES CITED Almy,MM and JG Deming 1982 Cultural Resources Survey of the Emerald Lakes Tract in Northwest Collier County,Florida. Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota FMSF#902. 1986a Archaeological Assessment Survey of Twelve Lakes,Collier County, Florida. Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota. 1986b Archaeological Assessment of Bretonne Park, Collier County, Florida Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota. Beriault, JG 1973 A Preliminary Report on the Area Known as the Collier-Coral Ridge Tract, Southwest Florida. Unpublished Ms, on file at FMSF, Tallahassee and AHC, Miami. 1986 Report and Recommendations Concerning the Barron Collier Company Tract on Chokoloskee Island,Collier County, Florida, MS on file,AHC. 1987 Suggestions for a Collier County site Model, a report submitted to the Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, December 15th, 1987. MS on file, AHC. 1999 An Archaeological Survey of the Winding Cypress Project, Collier County, Florida. Report #7248 on file, Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee, Florida. 2002 A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the Newton Square Parcel, Collier County, Florida. Report #14174 on file, Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee,Florida. 2003a A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the Collier Regional Medical Center Parcel, Collier County, Florida. Report #9380 on file, Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee,Florida. 2003b A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the Newton PUD Parcel, Collier County, Florida. Report #9393 on file, Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee, Florida. 2004a A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the Feathers Parcel, Collier County, Florida. Report#12980 on file,Division of Historic Resources,Tallahassee, Florida. 47 2004b A Phase One Archaeological Assessment of the Newton Square Parcel, Collier County,Florida.AHC Technical Report#558. 2005 A Phase One Archaeological Assessment of the Toll-Rattlesnake Parcel, Collier County,Florida.Report#13377 on file,Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee,Florida. 2006 A Phase One Archaeological Assessment of the Collier Boulevard, C.R. 951 Road Corridor, Interstate 75 to U.S.41, Collier County,Florida.Report#12980 on file, Division of Historic Resources,Tallahassee,Florida. 2007 A Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment of the San Marino Parcel, Collier County, Florida. Report #14563 on file, Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee, Florida. Beriault,JG, RS Carr,J Stipp, R Johnson, and J Meeder 1981 The Archaeological Salvage of the Bay West Site, Collier County, Florida. In Florida Anthropologist 34(20):39-58. Beriault,JG and C Strader 1984 A Preliminary Report on Stratigraphic Excavation on Chokoloskee Island, Florida. Southwest Florida Archaeological Society, MS on file,AHC. Beriault, John G.,David Boschi, Ryan Franklin and Joseph F.Mankowski 2006 Phase II Archaeological Investigations of the Lely#5 Site, 8CR751,Collier County, Florida.AHC Technical Report#771. Beriault, John G., Steve Bertone,Robert S. Carr, Michelle Cotty Loger,Matthew Betz 2012 A Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment In the Northern Part of Rookery Bay National Estuarine Reserve, Collier County, Florida. Report #19738 on file, Division of Historic Resources,Tallahassee,Florida. Beriault, John G.,Robert S. Carr and Matthew Fenno 2012 A Phase One Cultural Resources Assessment of the Lord's Way 30 Parcel, Collier County, Florida. Report #19475 on file, Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee,Florida. Bullen,RP and AK Bullen 1956 Excavation on Cape Haze Peninsula, Florida. Contributions of the Florida State Museum. Social Sciences I, Gainesville,Florida. Carbone, V 1983 Late Quaternary Environments in Florida and the Southeast. Florida Anthropologist 36(1-2): 3-17. 48 Carr,RS 1986 Preliminary Report on Excavations at the Cutler Fossil Site 8DA2001 in Southern Florida.Florida Anthropologist 39(3,pt. 2): 231-32. 2012 Digging Miami. University Press of Florida, Gainesville. Carr, RS and JG Beriault 1984 Prehistoric Man in South Florida. In PJ Gleason (ed), Environments of South Florida:Present and Past IL Coral Gables:Miami Geological Society,FL.pp. 1-14. Carr,Robert S. and Richard Haiduven 1990 An Archaeological Assessment of the Arete Golf Course Property, Collier County, Florida. Report #2605 on file, Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee, Florida. Carr,RS and W Steele 1993 An Archaeological Survey and Assessment of the Lely Resort Properties, Collier County,FL. AHC Technical Report#70. Carr, RS and K Heinz 1996 Archaeological Excavations at the Ryder Pond Site, 8LL1850,Lee County,FL. April, 1986. Carr,Robert S., Joseph F. Mankowski, David Boschi and John G. Beriault 2007 Archaeological Investigations of 8CR747 and 8CR750, Collier County, Florida. AHC Technical Report#782, Carr, Robert S.,John G. Beriault,Matthew Betz, Scott Faulkner and Joseph F. Mankowski 2008 Archaeological Monitoring at the Buschelman Site, 8CR726, Hawthorne II Parcel,Collier County,Florida.AHC Technical Report#841. Carr,Robert S. and Joseph F. Mankowski 2011. A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment of the Hacienda lakes Parcels and Phase II Assessment of CR1164, Collier County, Florida. Report#20097 on file, Division of Historic resources,Tallahassee,Florida. Clausen, C and J Gifford 1975 Florida spring confirmed as 10,000 year old early man site. The Florida Anthropologist 8(3),Part 2. Cushing,FH 1897 Exploration of Ancient Key-Dwellers' Remains on the Gulf Coast of Florida. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia 35 (153): 1-329-448. 49 Daniel,RI and M Wisenbaker 1987 Harney Flats. Baywood Publishing Company,Farmingdale,New York. Delcourt,H,DC West and PA Delacourt 1981 Forests of the Southeastern United States: Quantitative Maps For Aboveground Woody Biomass,Carbon, and Dominance of Major Tree Taxa.Ecology 62, no.4. Ehrenhard,JE,RS Carr, and RC Taylor 1978 The Archaeological Survey of Big Cypress National Preserve: Phase I. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center,Tallahassee, Florida. 1979 The Big Cypress National Preserve: Archaeological Survey Season 2. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee,Florida. Ehrenhard,JE and RC Taylor 1980 The Big Cypress National Preserve: Archaeological Survey Season 3. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center,Tallahassee, Florida. Florida Preservation Services 1986 Historical/Architectural Survey of Collier County, Florida. Report #1108 on file, Division of Historic Resources,Tallahassee,Florida. Fradkin,A 1976 The Wightman Site:A Study of Prehistoric Culture and Environment on Sanibel Island, Lee County, Florida. M.A. Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Florida, Gainesville. Fuhrmeister, C, RJ Austin,and H Hansen 1990 Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Collier Tract 22 Development Site, Collier County, Florida. Piper Archaeological Research Inc. St. Petersburg, Florida. FMSF 2423. Goggin,JM 1939 A Ceramic Sequence in South Florida.New Mexico Anthropologist 3:36-40. 1947 A Preliminary Definition of Archaeological areas and Periods in Florida. American Antiquity 13:114-127. 1949 The Archaeology of the Glades Area. Unpublished MS on file, SE Archaeological Research Center,NPS,Tallahassee,Fl. 1949 Cultural Traditions in Florida Prehistory. In J.W. Griffin (editor) The Florida Indian and his Neighbors. Winter Park,Florida: Rollins College. 50 Goggin,JM and WC Sturtevant 1964 The Calusa: A Stratified, Nonagricultural Society (with notes on sibling marriage). In W Goodenough (editor) Explorations in Cultural Anthropology. Essays in Honor of George Peter Murdock New York:McGraw Hill.Pp.179-291. Griffin,John W. 1988 The Archaeology of Everglades National Park: A Synthesis. Southeastern Frontiers,Tallahassee. Hrdlicka,A 1922 The Anthropology of Florida. Deland, Florida: Publications of the Florida State Historical Society 1. Kroeber,AL 1939 Cultural and Natural Areas in Native North America. Berkeley: University of California Press. Lee,AR, JG Beriault, W Buschelman,J Belknap 1993 A Small Site - Mulberry Midden, 8CR697 - Contributes to Knowledge of the Transitional Period. The Florida Anthropologist 46:43-52. Lee,AR, JG Beriault,J Belknap, WM Buschelman,AL Snapp and JW Thompson 1997 Salvage Excavation of an Archaic Period Special-Purpose Site in Collier County. The Florida Anthropologist 50:11-24. 1988 Heineken Hammock, 8CR231: A Late Archaic Corridor Site in Collier County. Southwest Florida Archaeological Society.Naples,Florida. Mankowski,Joseph F.,John G. Beriault, Craig Weaver and Mark Lance 2006 An Archaeological Investigation of the Buschelman Site (8CR726) and the Lely Site Number 6 (8CR752), Collier County,Florida.AHC Technical Report#723. Marquardt, WH 1984 The Josslyn Island Mound and its Role in the Investigation of Southwest Florida's Past. Gainesville: Florida State Museum,Department of Anthropology, Miscellaneous Project Report Series 22. 1987 The Calusa Social Formation in Protohistoric South Florida. In T.C. Patterson and C.W. Gailey(editors) Power Relations and State Formation. Washington,D.C.: Archaeology Section,American Anthropological Association,pp. 98-116. 1988 Politics and Production Among the Calusa of South Florida. In T. Ingold, D. Riches,and J. Woodburn(editors) Hunters and Gatherers 1:History, Evolution, and Social Change. London: Berg Publishers,pp. 161-188. 51 1992 Recent Archaeological and Paleoenvironmental Investigations in Southwest Florida. In W.H. Marquardt(editor), Culture and Environment in the Domain of the Calusa. Gainesville: Institute of Archaeology and Paleoenvironmental Studies.Monograph 1,University of Florida,pp. 9-58. Milanich,JT. and CH Fairbanks 1980 Florida Archaeology. New York:Academic Press. Morrell,R.L. 1969 Fiber-tempered Pottery from Southwestern Florida. Abstract of presented paper, American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting,New Orleans, on file at AHC. Russo,M 1990 Report I on Archaeological Investigations by the Florida Museum of Natural History at Horrs Island, Collier County,Florida.FMSF 2353. Scholl,DW,FC Craighead,and M Stuiver 1969 Florida Submergence Curve Revisited: Its Relation to Coastal Sedimentation Rates. Science 163: 562-564. Sears, W 1967 Archaeological Survey of the Cape Coral Area at the Mouth of the Caloosahatchee River. The Florida Anthropologist 20: 93-102. 1982 Fort Center:An Archaeological Site in the Lake Okeechobee Basin. Gainesville: University of Florida Press. Stirling, MW 1931 Mounds of the Vanished Calusa Indians of Florida. Smithsonian Institution Explorations and Field Work for 1930: 167-172. 1933 Report of the Chief.Bureau of American Ethnology Annual Report 48:3-21. 1936 Florida Cultural Affiliations in Relation to Adjacent Areas. In Essays in Anthropology in Honor of Alfred Louis Kroeber. Berkeley: University of California Press,pp 351-357. Taylor, RC 1984 Everglades National Park Archaeological Inventory and Assessment Season 2: Interim Report. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee,Florida. 1985 Everglades National Park Archaeological Inventory and Assessment Season 3: Interim Report. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee,Florida. 52 Widmer, R.J. 1983 The Evolution of the Calusa, a Non-agricultural Chiefdom on the Southwest Florida Coast. Ph.D. thesis, Pennsylvania State University, distributed by University Microfilms International,Ann Arbor,Michigan. 1996 Recent Excavations at the Key Marco Site, 8CR48, Collier County, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 49:10-26. Williams, JL 1837 The Territory of Florida. Gainesville: University Press of Florida. 53 APPENDIX I: FIELD SPECIMEN LOG 54 APPENDIX I: ROCKEDGE FIELD SPECIMEN LOG FS Site Number Provenience Elevation Description Date Collected by 1 CR1371 ST 101 0-94 cmbs STP(1);faunal bone(16) 5/2/2014 AW,WW 2 CR1371 ST 104 0-62 cmbs Unclassifed crudware(1);faunal bone 5/2/2014 AW,WW (14);rusted iron can(1) 3 CR1371 ST 109 0-26 cmbs STP(2);faunal bone(1) 5/2/2014 AW,WW 4 CR1371 ST 110 0-21 cmbs STP (2) 5/2/2014 AW,WW 5 CR1371 ST 111 0-63 cmbs STP (5) 5/2/2014 AW,WW 6 CR875 ST 152 10-34 cmbs STP (8);faunal bone(1);terrestrial snail (4);shell refuse;Macrocallista shell(1) 5/15/2014 AW,WW 7 CR726 ST 158 45-60cmbs Faunal bone(10+);Limestone fragment 5/15/2014 AW,WW 8 CR898 ST 159 0-21 cmbs Unclassified crud ware(1); Faunal bone 5/15/2014 AW,WW 9 CR898 ST 160 0-21 cmbs Faunal bone(5) 5/15/2014 AW,WW 10 CR898 ST 161 0-20 cmbs Faunal bone(5+);Cardiidae shell(1) 5/15/2014 AW,WW 11 CR898 ST 165 15-31 cmbs Macrocallista shell fragment(1) 5/15/2014 AW,WW 12 CR875 ST 167 36-79 cmbs Macrocallista shell fragment(1) 5/16/2014 AW,WW 13 CR875 ST 172 0-37 cmbs STP (5);faunal bone(12);broken shell 5/16/2014 AW,WW (1);terrestrial snail(3); lithic(1) 14 CR875 ST 174 0-36 cmbs Faunal bone(2);crab claw fragment(1); 5/16/2014 AW,WW Macrocallista shell fragments(5) 15 CR875 ST 177 10-48 cmbs Faunal bone(32);terrestrial snail(1); 5/16/2014 AW,WW broken shell(1); 16 CR875 ST 178 0-34 cmbs Faunal bone(36); snake vertebras(10); 5/16/2014 AW,WW oyster fragments(6) 17 CR875 ST 179 0-19 cmbs STP (1);faunal bone(16);otolith(1);gar 5/16/2014 AW,WW scales(4); 18 CR875 ST 180 20-55 cmbs Faunal bone(25);gar scales(5); 5/16/2014 AW,WW terrestrial snail(3);fossil shell(1) 19 CR875 ST 181 17-48 cmbs Faunal bone(6) 5/16/2014 AW,WW 20 CR875 ST 183 35-67 cmbs Faunal bone(8) 5/16/2014 AW,WW 21 . CR875 ST 186 0-11 cmbs Faunal bone(13);terrestrial snail(1) 5/16/2014 AW,WW 22 CR875 ST 188 0-10 cmbs STP (5);shell refuse;terrestrial snail(1) 5/16/2014 AW,WW Near ST 188, Deer Bone(1); Busycon ladle reshaped 23 CR875 General Surface from adze(1);Busycon adze(1);Tulip 5/16/2014 AW,WW Surface shell(1);Macrocallisfe shell fragments; Collection burnt Busycon shell fragment(1) 24 CR875 ST 207 0-10 cmbs STP(9);STP rim(1);faunal bone(1)shell 5/21/2014 AW,WW refuse 5 meters NW Upturned Sanibel incised rim(1);unclassified STP 25 CR875 of ST 212 tree stamped(1);STP(2);Macrocallista shell 5/22/2014 AW,WW (2) 26 CR875 ST 212 0-54 cmbs Faunal bone(2);mammal maxilla with 5/22/2014 AW,WW teeth;shell refuse(9);broken terrestrial 27 CR875 ST 211 0-23 cmbs STP incised rim(1);STP(18);faunal bone (2);broken shell(1) 5/22/2014 AW,WW 28 CR875 ST 198 0-21 cmbs Faunal bone;broken terrestrial snail(1) 5/22/2014 AW,WW 29 CR875 ST 210 0-27 cmbs Faunal bone(1) 5/22/2014 AW,WW 30 CR875 ST 208 0-23 cmbs Faunal bone(6); shell refuse(3) 5/22/2014 AW,WW 31 CR874 ST 214 0-21 cmbs Faunal bone(3) 5/22/2014 AW,WW 32 CR874 ST 218 0-26 cmbs STP(1);faunal bone(5);shell refuse(8); AW,WW terrestrial snail(1); 33 CR874 ST 219 0-30 cmbs STP(2); Faunal bone(1);shell refuse(2) 5/22/2014 AW,WW 34 CR874 ST 222 0-31 cmbs STP(1);faunal bone(7);terrestrial snail 5/22/2014 AW,WW (3); _ 35 CR874 ST 225 0-40 cmbs Faunal bone(8) ;broken Busycon (1) 5/23/2014 AW,RF 36 CR874 ST 226 0-14 cmbs Faunal bone(9);broken oyster(2); 5/23/2014 AW,RF terrestrial snail(1) 55 APPENDIX I: ROCKEDGE FIELD SPECIMEN LOG STP(1);terresterial snail(2);broken 37 CR874 ST 229 0-12 cmbs terrestrial snail or shell(1) 5/23/2014 AW,RF 38 ST 232 0-14 cmbs STP (9) 5/23/2014 AW,RF STP (2);faunal bone(7);small mammal teeth(3);shell refuse(1);clear glass 39 CR874 ST 233 0-49 cmbs fragment(1);worked wood-modern?(1); 5/23/2014 AW,RF unidentified small,metalic(rusted) • triangular object(1);iron nail(1) 40 CR874 ST 236 0-27cmbs STP(1);faunal bone(3) 5/23/2014 AW,RF 41 CR874 ST 237 0-32 cmbs Faunal bone(2) 5/23/2014 AW,RF 42 CR874 ST 221 0-25 curbs Faunal bone(2);terrestrial snail(2) 5/22/2014 AW,RF 43 CR875 ST 241 0-34 cmbs Faunal bone(4) 5/28/2014 AW,RF 44 CR875 ST 245 35-58 cmbs Faunal bone(1) 5/28/2014 AW,RF 45 CR874 ST 252 0-23 cmbs Faunal bone(25+) 5/29/2014 AW,RF STP (5);faunal bone(4);snake vertebra 46 CR874 ST 217 1-33 cmbs (1);shell refuse(5);Mercenaria shell(2); 5/22/2014 AW,RF broken Busycon (1);terresterial snail(1) 47 CR1371 ST 271 0-43 cmbs STP (8);faunal bone(9) 6/30/2014 WW,EI 48 CR1371 ST 272 0-48 cmbs Ft Drum"Crimped"rim(1);STP(4);faunal 6/30/2014 WW,EI bone(12) 49 CR1371 ST 278 0-37 cmbs STP(4);faunal bone(7) 6/30/2014 WW,EI 50 CR1371 ST 279 0-43 cmbs STP (8);faunal bone(10) 6/30/2014 WW,EI 51 CR1372 ST 282 SIP(3);faunal bone(2) 6/30/2014 WW,EI 52 CR1372 ST 287 Faunal bone(2) 7/2/2014 WVV,EI 53 CR1372 ST 290 Faunal bone(2) 7/2/2014 WW,EI 56 APPENDIX II: FLORIDA SURVEY LOG 57 APPENDIX IV: FLORIDA SITE FORMS - 8CR726, 8CR873, 8CR874, 8CR875, 8CR896, 8CR897, 8CR898, 8CR1371, 8CR1372 61 4,..,ttttt()44,,,, dw y' A PHASE II CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT OF ROCKEDGE #2 SITE 8CR1371 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL CONSERVANCY, INC. 4, ,,,,, , ,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,,N,..,,,,,i,.., .„ , ._,,i,„,' , i , .if „, „s„ . 4„ .*. i i VI 1 a, .. R ' t , Fa Vi � iF L AHC TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 1044 " . t a. s JANUARY 2015 ,. Attachment K A PHASE II CULTURAL RESOURCE ASSESSMENT OF ROCKEDGE #2 SITE 8CR1371 COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Robert S. Carr, M.S. John G. Beriault, B.A. ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORICAL CONSERVANCY, INC. 4800 SW 64th Avenue, Suite 107 Davie, Florida 33314 954-792-9776 archlgol@belisouth.net For: WATERMEN AT ROCKEDGE NAPLES,LLC AHC PROJECT NO. 2014.141 AHC TECHNICAL REPORT NO. 1044 JANUARY 2015 ��:,...�H..�•,<� �N., .a+� `$v"/......,,�usi „��.a.x�-:€-''fi:'.�`�,�"a'.. ,.. .�:11' k.,,.. ::N «.e.:._"3v.--�:n�...`R.*r��"fafl.:•:: �; 0.000 ,10QMS. TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES II CONSULTANT SUMMARY 1 PROJECT SETTING 3 PREVIOUS RESEARCH 9 CULTURAL SUMMARY 12 METHODOLOGY 21 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 27 REFERENCES CITED 30 APPENDIX I: SHOVEL TEST LOG 38 APPENDIX II: FIELD SPECIMEN LOG 42 APPENDIX III: FLORIDA SURVEY LOG 45 APPENDIX: IV: 8CR1371 SITE FORM 47 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. USGS map showing the location of Rockedge#2, 8CR1371 2 Figure 2. 1876 plat map for Township 50S, Range 26E with the project parcel boundaries superimposed 4 Figure 3. 1944 Copeland map for Township 50S, Range 26E with the project parcel boundaries superimposed 5 Figure 4. 1952 black &white aerial photograph of 8CR1371 6 Figure 5. View of intact portion of 8CR1371 7 Figure 6. View east at spoil piles and other disturbances just east of intact area of 8CR1371 7 Figure 7. USGS map of the southwestern corner of the Rockedge parcel depicting 8CR1371. 8 Figure 8. 2014 aerial photograph of 8CR1371 depicting site boundaries 23 Figure 9. Map of intact site boundary and shovel tests at 8CR1371 24 Figure 10. North wall of Test Unit 1 25 Figure 11.View northwest at Ivy Andino and Mike Pujazon excavating Test Unit 2. 25 Figure 12.Test Unit 2 looking north 26 Figure 13.Test Unit 2 looking west 26 Figure 14. Unit 1 north wall profile 29 ii CONSULTANT SUMMARY In December, 2014, the Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. (AHC) conducted a Phase II cultural resource assessment for Watermen at Rockedge Naples, LLC of the archaeological site 8CR1371 in Collier County. The site is located in Township 50S, Range 26E, Section 23 (Figure 1). The .1-acre site area was assessed by systematic shovel testing and two units to determine site extent, degree of intactness, and significance. This assessment was conducted to fulfill historic resource requirements in response to State of Florida and Collier County historic preservation guidelines. The work and the report conform to the specifications set forth in Chapter 1A-46, Florida Administrative Code,and Module Three Guidelines. The Rockedge #2 site, 8CR1371 was discovered during the Phase I assessment of the Rockedge parcel in June, 2014 (Carr et al. 2014). At that time, 31 shovel tests were dug across the site of which nine were positive for prehistoric material, but only three encountered undisturbed cultural deposits. The Phase II assessment was conducted to determine the extent of intact cultural deposits within the site. An additional 17 shovel tests were excavated. Twelve contained intact cultural deposits. Two test units also were excavated near the site center to recover a larger sample of cultural material. As a result of this assessment it was determined that cultural deposits on that part of 8CR1371 are largely intact,particularly below a level of disturbed context of redeposited midden and fill. This site is regarded as eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places based on Criterion D. It is recommended that the intact portion of the site(Figures 8,9)be preserved if feasible. If any portion of the site cannot be preserved, then Phase III archaeological mitigation should be conducted on those affected areas. 1 ,! I 0/ •yr 4 • �t '�, I; N An I �. ..� j��t . 1 1 1 ,e� '"" 0 . . 1 ► • At. wow _ �I ' •• .• • • • • it L • ` • • • I ....r II,, ,a _ : ',. • 'I o * • * ' ''' 1, rr* 7 • • '. I SITE 8CR1371 gg0 '' �'. 6 I. 26 Figure 1.USGS map of the Rockedge parcel showing location of Rockedge#2, 8CR1371. TOWNSHIP 50S,RANGE 26E,SECTION 23 Iiiii-e! I # 0 118 1/4 1/2 Mile approx. USGS Map: BELLE MEADE,REV.1881 0 .2 .4 .8 Km.approx. 2 PROJECT SETTING The Rockedge #2 site, 8CR1371 is a black-earth midden located in west-central Collier County in Township 50S,Range 26E,southwest quadrant of Section 23.The site lies east of and adjacent to Collier Boulevard (SR-951) and slightly north of Sabal Palm Road. The relevant USGS Quadrangle map is Belle Meade(Figure 1). Historically, the general project area was depicted on the 1876 plat map as situated between two areas labeled as "cypress swamp" representing Rattlesnake Hammock SIough to the west and Bird Rookery and Fort Keis Slough to the east (Figure 2). The 1944 Copeland map shows the site situated in a cypress flatwoods and marsh(Figure 3). The 1952 aerial photograph shows the site as a small, round hammock about 150 feet in diameter surrounded by cypress flatwoods and scattered small hammocks(Figure 4). Currently,the site area is a high canopy mix of old-growth live oaks(several approaching 3 feet in diameter), mature cabbage palms, some remnant understory tropical hardwoods, and emerging exotic trees and shrubs,probably escapees from a nursery to the immediate south. The 1991 USGS map shows two structures, likely residential, positioned to the immediate north of the site (Figure 5). These structures are destroyed and only a well pipe exists north of the site area marking one of the house sites. The geology of the area is characterized by solutioned and chalky limestone caprocks exposed or overlain by sands or shelly marls.A fine gray to tan sand found extensively in the district is poorly drained fine sand which usually overlies relict marine deposits of shelly marl and limestone caprock that are part of the Pleistocene Caloosahatchee formation. These marine marls contain lenses and deposits of clay intermixed with varying percentages of sand. These clays may have been a source for ceramic manufacture by the Formative Period Native Americans. The one soil type present on the site is Pineda fine sand, limestone substratum (United States Department of Agriculture 2014). 3 'y i jf .L.JU r�!L :.,JY ( 1 ; • f i I 5 q, f f r r f # F "^ 1 1 „.,4"' c..r1•. ....1 : ...Id t d .■`Lt,, i r:; .wn •, fly i a, r �.. PROJECT PARCEL p ,,..CRI" - z T' 2J 4 a w t!'ff� � ' , A�C' 1 .1,,,T I I I.,d I' ,,....,o 1,. il Figure 2. 1876 plat map for Township 50S,Range 26E with the project parcel boundaries superimposed. ev IN 11111111► o 1/4 1/2 1 Mile approx, 0 .4 .8 1.6 Km.approx. 4 SS sk r ti 4 d ` � ,,• No 1 s a0 G t 4 � II 22 I 14 84 4 , 6 " r t 1 • 9 I . ft id i F ti ri • .. `"`27'`, e G 25 /. `'S'k _.•••46/1. 1.11/4.%.**1/2‘2' , 5 ole.'°".' Figure 3. 1944 Copeland plat map for Township 50S,Range 26E with the project parcel boundaries superimposed. f.'` I ____ 1 , 0 1/4 1/2 1 We approx. 0 .4 .6 1.6 Km.approx. 5 , ;.!:417... a a * AP 44 ~ mot.e -'SOI kt 1 :.', .0,1. . : . Trifir‘ V "., .t...• , 11%108:4", ,.,11.beAr :..,_ *.' 4 4:4 .4 • ..14i. -7774tie il•• ''. ? +4..- 'd, • •tt g'*- . *'.x y #.+^ t;, •i.. '.--'5 ,viL • M'.,--4411144,' ' , _ te .« t "77.< aL. ��•�� y e .A4 I- _a . ..M ''yy11-��((Vr,,/,�� ♦ .. , ,,!y(g,,,� Icy'. a' U, R . Y c tf, AA^^ •R r' s f k t-4,.., ' i t. •or•« At, , . , ' illif ' "" `" ',.- 8CR1371 s`i ." s y 46 * `i . ry',ems • •': ' ,s ' . F r, tt . I*' t r' ' . 1O .'1. ! � 4 y�jR '.;■A'' 444'"v * 14ilter ... ', ;,ist,,,,," jii. ,ww . ':.' ', . • ns .. ♦ . 0 Figure 4. 1952 black and white aerial photograph of 8CR1371. =PARCEL BOUNDARY ( 1 0 165 330 660 Feet approx. 0 50 100 200 Meters approx. 6 d+ '�i1"�*°1 6 #.. *3, fir' 4 �+ :� 1 arr or _ d It it . V '' Figure 5.View of intact portion of 8CR1371. Iiii. , ,,i.„,.. . 40,„ , . ,,„ . , if„,.‘,„ . ,, . .„„ . , 1 „..0. , , ,,:,,,,,,,,lif s,• ,„tr. .,, *. ,,,,,, ,,,,,,, . ‘,.., ,„ , ,r ,,,, . , „ . „,„.. , 4 4 ' , f L11* t, H $,�i .: - ' o z,, 1 Figure 6.View east at spoil piles and other disturbances just east of intact area of 8CR1371. 7 -44 41 • .+M 8 1 .411t1 a ti STRUCTURES INTACT PORTION OF 8CR1371 ■ P Figure 7.USGS map of the southwestern corner of the Rockedge parcel depicting 8CRI 371.Note the two structures shown on the parcel in 1991. =PARCEL BOUNDARY 0 165 330 660 Feet approx. SOURCE USG&-BELLE MEADE REVISED 1991 0 50 100 200 Meters approx. 8 PREVIOUS RESEARCH Southern Florida has been a focus of archaeological investigations since the 1880s, although much of the early work was directed toward the recovery of museum quality artifacts rather than understanding cultural processes. The first attempt to systematically survey the area's archaeological sites was by Ales Hrdlieka, who explored the coast and tidal mangrove estuaries in 1918, focusing on the Ten Thousand Island region(Hrdlieka 1922). Hrdlieka noted that southwest Florida was a distinct region within south Florida and made an attempt to type sites by function. John M. Goggin was the first to define a south Florida cultural area (Glades Area), and describe south Florida ceramics (Glades ware), establishing a basis for later archaeological work. He published an analysis of the ceramic sequence in south Florida (Goggin 1939). In later reports (Goggin, 1947, 1949a, 1949b), he formulated a basic framework of cultural areas and chronologies that is still current (although modifications with additional data have been made, see further discussion below). Goggin (1949b) summarized much of this information in an unpublished manuscript. For several decades, many of the modern archaeological investigations in the region took place in the Cape Haze, Charlotte Harbor and Pine Island areas. Arlene Fradkin from the University of Florida investigated sites in the Pine Island Sound/Sanibel Island area in the 1970s. Her first project was at the Wightman site on northern Sanibel Island (Fradkin 1976). In 1983,Marquardt began a series of investigations at Josslyn Key,Useppa Island, Pineland, Buck Key, Galt Island in Lee County, and at Big Mound Key in Charlotte County (Marquardt 1984, 1987, 1988, 1992). Marquardt and Russo also excavated at Horns Island where large shell midden sites there appear to be late Archaic, indicating a more elaborate social organization at and larger sedentary or semi-sedentary population than previously known for the Late Archaic period(Russo 1990). Most of the recent studies focused on the coastal sites,as have subsequent summaries and discussions. Recent work on the interior has made significant advances in documenting the extent of inland sites, especially in the Big Cypress and Everglades parks (Ehrenhard et al., 1978, 1979;Ehrenhard and Taylor 1980). Beriault and colleagues (1981) reported on salvage excavations at Bay West Nursery (8CR200). Their description of the site represents the first documentation of a Middle Archaic mortuary pond in Collier County. In the last two decades increasing development and the requirements of land use legislation resulted in a number of reports by cultural resource management consultants. While most of these reports are limited in scope many have produced useful summaries of regional archaeology, as well as insightful analysis of the relationship between site types and location and ecotypes (Almy and Deming I982, 1986a, 1986b; Fuhrmeister et al. 1990). 9 Arthur W.Lee,John Beriault and others in the Southwest Florida Archaeological Society (SWFAS) have recorded and investigated a large number of archaeological sites in Collier and Lee Counties. It is an ongoing effort of the Society to publish and disseminate reports and manuscripts (Lee et al. 1993, 1997, 1998; Beriault 1973, 1986; Beriault and Strader 1984). Many of these reports deal with small interior sites. In addition, Beriault completed several unpublished manuscripts as to site types and archaeological areas (Beriault 1982, 1987). In April of 1991, David Dickel conducted a selective countywide assessment of archaeological sites adding many newly recorded sites to the Florida Master Site File. AHC has a twenty-year history of assessing several large tracts of land surrounding and adjacent to the project parcel in the Belle Meade/Lely/Rattlesnake Hammock area, beginning with the assessment of the Arete Country Club in 1990 (Carr and Haiduven 1990). A 1993 assessment in the Lely Estates parcel located immediately west of the current project parcel resulted in the documentation of one previously recorded site, 8CR726, and the discovery of six new archaeological sites surrounding Henderson Slough (Carr and Steele 1993). In 1999, a total of thirteen archaeological sites were reported by AHC archaeologists in the 2300-acre Winding Cypress Parcel immediately south of the project parcel(Beriault 1999). In 2003 AHC assessed the 60-acre Collier Regional Medical Center immediately north of the project (Beriault 2003a). In 2003 and 2004, work on the Newton Square PUD parcel (now a portion of the present project parcel) resulted in six previously unrecorded archaeological sites being reported (Beriault 2003b, 2004b). In 2004 and 2005 AHC personnel assessed the 2000+acre Feathers(later called Toll-Rattlesnake)parcel adjacent and to the north and east, finding five new sites (Beriault 2004a, Beriault and Weaver 2005). A 2006 project for the widening of Collier Boulevard resulted in the determination that a portion of the Buschelman Site, 8CR726, existed in the right-of-way (Beriault 2006). In 2007 AHC recorded three archaeological sites in the 200+- acre San Marino Parcel 1/2 mile north of the project parcel (Beriault 2007). A 2011 reassessment of the Hacienda Lakes Parcel led to the recording of three archaeological sites (Carr and Mankowski 2011). In 2007 AHC initiated a multi-year investigation and monitoring of development of the Henderson Marsh complex of sites west of the project parcel. These sites included the extensive Buschelman Site, 8CR726 and the Lely Sites #1 (8CR747), #3 (8CR749), #5 (8CR750), #4 (8CR751), and#6 (8CR752) (Beriault et al. 2006, Mankowski et al. 2007, Carr et al 2007, Carr et al. 2008). Subsequent Phase II testing was conducted on Sites 8CR726, 8CR749 and 8CR752 with additional Phase III testing performed on 8CR716 and 8CR752,together with subsequent monitoring activity as the sites were impacted by development. Since 2003 parts of the overall Rockedge parcel have been subject to cultural resource assessments focused on various smaller parcels that would eventually characterize the greater Rockedge parcel. AHC first completed a reconnaissance-level assessment of a portion of the parcel (then called Newton PUD) in 2003 (Beriault 20031)) documenting 10 three previously unrecorded archaeological sites (8CR873, 8CR874 and 8CR875) and documenting an eastern component of(8CR726). In 2004 an assessment of a twenty-acre addition in the eastern portion of the parcel (called Newton Square) resulted in the documentation of three additional unrecorded archaeological sites (8CR896, 8CR897 and 8CR898 —Beriault 2004b). In 2006 AHC returned to the parcel (now called Rockedge) and dug a series of systematic shovel tests across the parcel (Beriault and Crump 2006). In May through June,2014,AHC conducted a Phase I cultural resource assessment of the 107.9 acre Rockedge parcel (Carr et al. 2014). Part of that scope of work was systematically assessing several new contributing parcels in the south and southwestern portions of the overall parcel. Site 8CR1371 was one of two sites discovered in the 2014 Phase I assessment, during which 31 shovel tests were dug across the site of which nine were positive for prehistoric material. It was determined that the site was largely disturbed,but a portion is of the site was determined to be potentially eligible for listing in the National Register of Historic Places(NRHP)based on Criterion D.It was recommended that this part of the site should be avoided and that if avoidance was not feasible then a Phase II assessment should be conducted(Carr et al. 2014). 11 CULTURAL SUMMARY Stirling was the first to distinguish the indigenous prehistoric cultures of southern Florida in 1936 by defining a Glades cultural area, including all of south Florida(Stirling 1936, Carr et al. 1994b:9; Milanich, 1994:5-6). Griffin (1988) pointed out that this was not formulated as a strict cultural area, but it was rather a geographic region with some common cultural traits. Kroeber (1939), in a review of North American prehistory, utilized a slightly different term, the"South Florida Area,"basing his definition on both environmental and cultural factors. Subsequently Goggin delineated more particular boundaries for southern Florida and divided the region into three sub-areas: "Okeechobee" around Lake Okeechobee, "Tekesta" for southeast Florida and the Florida Keys, and "Calusa" for Southwest Florida (Carr and Beriault 1984, Goggin 1947:114 127). Following Goggin's study, subsequent researchers have revised the cultural distinctions attributed to southern Florida's prehistoric populations. There has been criticism that Goggin's names and definitions were based on historic accounts of the main (proto) historic groups found in the respective regions and not on the archaeological evidence of spatial, temporal, and cultural differences (Sears 1966, Griffin 1974, Carr and Beriault 1984). Griffin, in particular, questioned the distinctions. He believed that South Florida cultures varied only by local environmental conditions and ceramic exchange rates. Griffin believed the inhabitants of prehistoric southern Florida were mainly dwelling on the coast and that the interior was nearly uninhabited and under-utilized. Griffin designated the entire southern Florida region as the "Circum-Glades" area (Griffin 1974:342-346). This new designation for the area was furthered by a widely circulated book on Florida archaeology by Milanich and Fairbanks (1980). Griffin later (1988) retreated to some extent from his earlier position as further research (particularly by Ehrenhard et al. in the Big Cypress and Carr in the eastern Everglades in the 1970s and 1980s)showed abundant sites in the interior Everglades. Carr and Beriault (1984), in particular, have taken issue with the concept of a singular Circum-Glades region. Carr's research in the Big Cypress and Everglades and his subsequent analysis demonstrating variation of key cultural markers (particularly in decorated ceramics) formed the basis for this contention. There is abundant evidence for cultural (and probably political or tribal) diversity in the various areas of south Florida. Can and Beriault particularly noted and defined differences between the lower southwest Florida coast, which they termed the "Ten Thousand Island"region, and the area to the north,which they called the"Caloosahatchee"region. This latter area they believed to be the seat of the historic Calusa chiefdomship, although previous (and some subsequent) researchers have called the entire southwest Florida from Cape Sable to the Cape Haze peninsula(and beyond)in Charlotte County"Calusa." Griffin, in his definitive 1988 synthesis on Everglades archaeology, attempted to reconcile and refine some of the conflict in the definition of south Florida prehistoric and historic culture areas. As stated by Carr and colleagues (1994b), "the issue...appears in part to be one of trying to determine the significance of regional and temporal variation, 12 rather than whether these differences are real." There is evidence that changes through time in regional political affiliations or realties makes any model not addressing this complex issue two-dimensional. The Calusa hegemony that was in place by the time of the arrival of Europeans may have begun as early as 800 AD in the Ten Thousand Island "district" or area (Griffin 1988:321; Carr et al. 1994b:12). There is currently ongoing research to further refine present thought as to cultural affiliations in south Florida. It would seem only a matter of time before new directions and emphases provide a more accurate summation of south Florida cultural affinities. Using the present models, the coastal zones of Collier County and southern Lee County contain three distinct culture areas. Indian Hill on Marco Island lies thirty miles from the projected interface by Carr and Beriault (1984) of the Caloosahatchee area (called the "the `heartland' of the Calusa,"Carr et at 1994b:12)to the north, and the Ten Thousand Islands area to the south. At a yet undefined point to the east lies the Okeechobee cultural area,but the boundary,if it is a definite, fixed one, is likely to occur in the vicinity of the Immokalee rise forty miles or more to the northeast of Indian Hill. Further work is in progress by Carr to address the issue of where the southwest boundaries of the Okeechobee culture area occur. TEMPORAL PERIODS The following information is generalized and abbreviated. The dates are approximate; transitions between periods more gradual than as expressed for convenience. PALED PERIOD (14,000- 8,500 BP) During the Paleo Period, Native Americans began moving into the southeastern portion of North America into Florida. Most evidence of their presence in Florida can be reliably dated to about 10,000 BP. There are no known Paleoindian sites in Collier County. Several are documented from elsewhere in south Florida, including Warm Mineral Springs and Little Salt Springs in Sarasota County (Clausen and Gifford 1975), Harney Flats in Hillsborough County (Daniel and Wisenbaker 1987) and the Cutler Fossil Site in Dade County (Carr 1986, 2012). During this period, the terminal Wisconsian ice age, the climate was probably less extreme, with cooler summers and warmer winters. The climate was also drier, and sea levels were lower(Carbone 1983,Carr 1986,Griffin 1988). One reason that possible Paleo period sites have not been discovered in Collier and Lee Counties is that the shoreline may have been as much as 100 miles further west due to lower sea levels. Drier conditions may have made the interior very inhospitable, and the shallow estuarine and littoral sites that existed were flooded by post-ice age Holocene sea rises. Any possible interior sites from the Paleo Period may be unrecognizable due to lack of diagnostic artifacts, low population density, and few permanent camps. These and other 13 factors may help explain the absence to date of identifiable Paleo period sites in Collier and Lee Counties. ARCHAIC PERIOD (8,500 -2,500 BP) The Archaic period reflects a post-Pleistocene shift in adaptation marked by an increase in the seasonal exploitation of a broad spectrum of food resources, a more restricted use of territory due to regional specialization, and more semi-sedentary habitation sites. No ceramics are known until the Late Archaic. During the Archaic, regional specializations became more marked, not only with material culture but also with distinct local utilization of local plant and animal resources. As mentioned above, there is, as yet, no firm evidence of human presence in southwest Florida during the Paleo period. This apparently is also true for the Early Archaic (8500- 7000BP), as there is evidence of an environment too arid to support scrub oak, and the presence of shifting wind formed dunes (Watts 1975, Widmer 1983). No early Archaic sites are known from southwest Florida. By about 6500 BP mesic conditions began to spread, although localized xeric conditions continued (and still exist in some areas) through south Florida. Middle Archaic sites dating from this time are rare, although the Bay West Nursery site (8CR200) in Collier County and the Ryder Pond site (8LL1850) in Lee County near Bonita Springs provide evidence of occupation, as do several sites in southeast Florida. The Bay West site is a Middle Archaic cypress pond cemetery, associated with a lithic scatter. The Ryder Pond site is a similar mortuary pond site surrounded by pine flatwoods(Carr and Heinz 1996). Beriault has also recorded several aceramic shell scatters in coastal sand hills (paleo dunes), some of which may date to the Middle Archaic. Griffin (1988) summarizes evidence indicating that despite the rise of available surface water,brackish estuaries and other major modem landscape features had not formed, and population(or repopulation) was still sparse. During the Archaic period sea levels began to rise at a fairly rapid rate, estimated at 8.3 cm. per 100 years 6000-3000 BP, and 3.5 cm per 100 years afterwards (Scholl et al. 1969), although whether sea levels were steadily rising or oscillating is still unclear(see Griffin 1988 for recent reviews of the literature). Data is somewhat difficult to sort out as sea level rise was accompanied by both shore regression and transgression in places. As conditions became wetter (and warmer) in the interior, cypress swamps and hardwood sub-tropical forests established themselves by about 5000 BP (Carbone 1983, Delcourt and Delcourt 1981). By late Middle or early Late Archaic times (4000 years BP) there were significant shell mounds and middens on Horrs Island,Marco Island,and elsewhere in the coastal regions, suggesting that the estuary system had been established and was being utilized to provide the subsistence basis for denser populations and semi-sedentary settlements (Morrell 1969). At Useppa Island in Lee County, excavations have provided radiocarbon dates from pre-ceramic shell middens ranging between roughly 4900 BP and 5600 BP, suggesting that the Middle Archaic as well as Late Archaic periods saw a growing 14 dependence on shellfish resources(Milanich et al. 1984). There are aceramic coastal sand hill and interior wetland sites as well,but these have not been demonstrated to be Archaic despite some investigators equating aceramic with preceramic. Radiocarbon dates for these sites would clarify this point. Carr points out that if the wet tree islands were initially used by Archaic people, then at least some of the hardwood hammocks in swamp environments were of higher elevation (with subsequent changes in vegetation) due to human activities. Post-Archaic people extensively utilized these hammocks and continued to advance their development as distinct geomorphic features. This is obviously an area where additional archaeological investigations have a potential to contribute to understanding the interaction of geomorphic and cultural evolution in southwest Florida. Toward the end of the Archaic fiber-tempered pottery appears in southwest Florida, often used as a marker of the Orange Phase, commencing at about 4000 BP, either coincident with or soon after the development of the extensive shell middens. The Late Archaic Orange Phase subsistence strategy is characterized by intensive use of shellfish and marine resources, as well as being marked by an accelerated trend toward regional specializations. A number of the large shell middens on Marco Island (Cockrell 1970), Horrs Island (Russo n.d.), Cape Haze (Bullen and Bullen 1956), and elsewhere date from this period or earlier, as they contain fiber-tempered ceramics, although there are known aceramic (preceramic?) levels below the Orange Phase deposits that may date to the Middle Archaic. These shell middens are usually capped by deposits from later occupations as well. A Late Archaic horizon was recently discovered at the Argo Manatee site on Henderson Creek located four miles south of the project parcel(Carr et al. 2114). FORMATIVE STAGE OR GLADES PERIODS (2500 BP- 500 BP) The Formative or Glades adaptation, based on hunting, fishing, and the harvesting of shellfish and plants, was similar to the Archaic, but was characterized by increasing specializations in gathering strategies and tool-making. Earlier writers have typed this hunter-gatherer society as primitive or "low-level" (Kroeber 1939). However, there is certainly evidence from the specialization of tools, from the beautifully-executed wood carvings from Key Marco in Collier County and those from Fort Center near Lake Okeechobee (Cushing 1897, Sears 1982), and from the historic accounts of the Calusa hegemony, that the south Florida area had an advanced culture that Goggin (1964) has called a"stratified non-agrarian society." The preceding Late Archaic late Orange phase(also known as the transitional phase)was marked by changes in pottery, and terminated with the relatively rapid replacement of fiber-tempered pottery with sand-tempered,limestone-tempered,and chalky"temperless" pottery. It was also characterized by changes in ceramic style and often by reduction in the size of stone projectile points. 15 The Formative Stage (beginning about 2500 BP) is divided in south Florida into the Glades Periods sequence. Subsistence adaptation is marked by a narrowing spectrum of resource use, as well as continued trends toward regional diversity and ecological specializations, marked in part by the proliferation of inland resource extraction encampments. Formative Period cultural evolution eventually led to increased political sophistication, perhaps initially of modest dimensions, but culminating in broad regional political alliances and regulation of materials and goods (i.e. resources) between the coast and inland areas (Milanich and Fairbanks 1980). By protohistoric and contact times the Calusa were the dominant tribal group, gaining broad political influence and at least partial control over much of south Florida as far north as central Brevard County. Historically, the main Calusa village has been regarded as "Calos" on Mound Key in Estero Bay in Lee County, although 50 to 70 large villages were under direct Calusa control by contact times(Griffin 1988). During the Formative Periods, village sites grew to the proportions of large multi-use complexes,particularly along the coast and barrier islands of southwest Florida. Some of the projected intra-site functions of the elements of these complex shellworks were as temples, canals, causeways, temple and platform mounds, courtyards and watercourts. Current research involving the excavating of large contiguous areas of these shell mound complexes is beginning to establish demonstrable uses for the features of these large sites,upon which heretofore were merely speculated(Widmer 1996). Tidal estuary rivers and inland hammocks along deep water sloughs, marshes, and permanent ponds were seasonally visited for extraction of natural resources, and are now marked by small to relatively large black dirt middens, some of which may have been semi-permanent hamlets. The pine and cypress flatwoods appear to have supported few sites, although areas around Lake Trafford and other rich interior areas developed substantial sites, including sand mounds, and may be more similar to the Okeechobee cultural area than to the coastal cultures. In 1992,Dickel and Carr excavated a Deptford Period burial mound(the Oak Knoll Site) in the Bonita Bay Tract north of the Imperial River. Exotic trade items and seventy or more human burials were among the material findings. The resulting conclusions and subsequent surveying and testing of the Bonita Bay Shell works(8LL717) suggest social stratification and complexity may extend further back into the past than the Formative period(Dickel and Carr 1992). Coastal sites(shell middens)reflect a predominate dependence on fish and shellfish,wild plant foods and products,and larger inland game. The inland sites show a greater reliance on interior resources, including large, medium and small mammals, turtle, small freshwater fish, alligator, snake, frogs, and, sometimes, freshwater shellfish. Interior and coastal resource exchange can be documented by the consistent finds of moderate amounts of marine shell in many interior middens, as well as interior resources in coastal middens. 16 The Formative Stage (with a nod to Goggin) has been often termed the Glades cultural tradition. Much of this "tradition" is focused on decorated ceramics, the minority in the archaeological record, although the majority of recovered (rim) sherds are plainware. However, despite this, pottery (and its decorations) is usually utilized as the major temporal marker(s)for fitting sites into a temporal framework. Changes in pottery do not represent mere changes in artistic motifs, but reflect inter- and intra-regional trade contacts and outside cultural influences (possibly through exogamy, shifting of populations, and even the through evolution of a culture through time). Whatever the influences,the Glades tradition is continuous from post-Archaic times to contact times. Despite the fact that exogamy is likely to have been practiced,traders or other specialists probably moved between major cultural areas in small numbers, and genetic flow probably accompanied cultural exchange, although perhaps not on the same scale. This may have increased in later times due to use of traditional obligations of kinship and intermarriage to stabilize alliances that were not codified into a formal legal system. The following table has been modified from several sources, but it is predominantly based on Milanich and Fairbanks (1980), Griffin (1988), and Allerton and Carr (1990). Dates have been rounded somewhat and translated to Before Present (BP). There are some differences of opinion in the dates, particularly about the timing of the Glades Ia and Ib division. Table 1: Glades Cultural Sequence Glades Ia(2500 BP- 1500 BP) Appearance of sand tempered plain pottery, but little else to mark a difference and the preceding Late Archaic. Sand tempered plain remains a predominate type throughout the Glades sequence. Glades Ib(1500 BP- 1250 BP) Appearance of decorated sand-tempered ceramic (Ft.Drum Incised,Ft.Drum Punctated,Cane Patch Incised, Turner River Punctate), plainware common. Pottery rim grooving and incision decorations become widespread, Glades Ila(1250 BP- 1100 BP) Appearance of Key Largo Incised, Sanibel Incised, Miami Incised, and plainware is common. Distinction between ceramics of southeast and southwest Florida becomes apparent. Ten Thousand Island area distinct from Caloosahatchee area. First mound construction- increased social stratification? Population size may have approximated that at contact. Glades IIb(1100- 1000 BP) Appearance of Matecumbe Incised; Key Largo Incised common on east coast, Gordon's Pass 17 Incised common on the west, and plainware common throughout. Glades Ilc(1000 BP-800 BP) Appearance of Plantation Pinched, but few decorated wares with a preponderance of plainware (there is some evidence of population reduction- perhaps due to a cataclysmic event). Non-local pottery (e.g. St. Johns Plain and Check Stamped, Belle Glade Plain)appears. Glades IIIa(800-600 BP) Appearance of Surfside Incised, increasing quantities of St. Johns pottery (especially on East Coast),and Belle Glade pottery. Glades IIIb(600 BP -500 BP) Glades Tooled rims appear (rare on West Coast), zoned punctate designs, but general decline in incised decoration. Belle Glade ceramics common on west coast. St. Johns ware present but rare on West Coast,common on East Coast. Glades IIIc(500 BP-300 BP) Continuation of IIIb ceramics, with pronounced flaring of rims and embossing on Glades Tooled ceramics. Mound burial construction less common with intrusive burials into existing mounds, appearance of European goods,plainware common. HISTORICAL PERIOD By European contact times (the first half of the 16th century), the southwest coast of Florida was maintaining a vigorous, expanding political chiefdom with a broad network of alliances, as well as a rich and ancient cultural tradition without an agricultural base. However, direct conflict with Europeans and, more importaantly, exposure to European diseases led to the rapid decline of the Calusa. By the mid 1700s their numbers had greatly diminished. The remnants of this once-powerful tribe may have left south Florida in the 1760s with the Spanish for relocation in Cuba. Others may have become indistinguishable from Spanish Cuban fishermen who worked the fishing "ranchos" in Pine Island Sound catching and salting fish for export to Cuba. Other groups may have merged with the Creek-derived Seminoles. In the late 1700s, members of the Creek tribe were forced into Florida from Georgia and Alabama. They were later called Seminoles, possibly derived from the Spanish term "cimmarones." Expanding settlements and new homesteads by Anglo-Europeans forced Native Americans into the Big Cypress and Everglades by the 1830s. By this time, most of the cultural identity of pre-contact tribes had been lost, although some of the Calusa subsistence strategies may have been partly adopted by Seminoles. A number of Seminole period sites have been documented on prehistoric Glades middens. This 18 association may in part reflect the paucity of high land in the interior (Ehrenhard et al. 1978,Ehrenhard and Taylor 1980. Midden sites were often the foci for historic Seminole gardens and fruit groves. Seminole periods in south Florida are divided into I(1820-1860), II (1860-1900) and III (1900-1940) (Ehrenhard et al. 1978). Post-1940 Seminole camps are designated "Late Seminole" in some reports. These designations reflect the different stages of Seminole migration into south Florida, Seminole displacement and active conflict with the expanding American culture, and the eventual refuge by Seminole remnants in Big Cypress and Everglades regions. The advent of the Second and Third Seminole Wars (1834-38, 1855-58) disrupted the peaceful settlement of the Southwest Florida region. There were several forts, "temporary"and permanent,established along the Caloosahatchee River during this time. Fort Dulaney was established at Punta Rassa near the mouth of the Caloosahatchee in 1837 and was occupied intermittently through 1841,and again in 1855. After a hurricane destroyed Ft. Dulaney in 1841,Fort Harvie was established upriver. The name of this fort was changed in 1850 by its commander General Twiggs to honor his new son-in-law, Col. Abraham Myers. Fort Myers was thus created, and became the chief fort of the region. From this central administrative point, a line of forts was established up the Caloosahatchee River. They were: Fort Denaud, Fort Adams, Fort Thompson, and Fort Center on Fisheating Creek leading into Lake Okeechobee. Other forts and "temporary depots" were established south into the Big Cypress Swamp such as Fort Simon Drum, Temporary Depot Number One, Fort Doane, Fort Simmons, Fort Keis, Fort Foster, Fort Shackleford, and others. Rattlesnake Hammock Area History The Rattlesnake Hammock area has always attracted human activity, from prehistoric to historic times. There is evidence from military maps of the Seminole Wars period that several Seminole villages and encampments were in the general area of the hammock. By the 1880s, various white settlers and homesteaders such as the Whiddens, Carrolls, Smiths, and Kirklands had settled the area of Henderson Creek immediately south of Rattlesnake Hammock. These early settlers farmed the Henderson Creek area and hunted up into Rattlesnake Hammock. Various early sportsmen visiting or wintering in Naples took oxcart trips into the Rattlesnake Hammock area to hunt. The advent of the Tamiami Trail in the late 1920s further opened access to the,area. The completion of the Atlantic Coastline Railway by 1928 also enabled logging of pine and cypress in the Belle Meade area south of Rattlesnake Hammock. State Road 951 was built in the late 1950s/early 1960s and opened up Rattlesnake Hammock to development by landholders. The Sabal Palm Road community was created during that time period. Landscaping demands in the rapidly-developing Naples area caused early residents such as the Langford family and "Monkey" Hunter to dig and transport cabbage palms from the hammock. Other individuals such as Seth and Buster Johns harvested cypress trees for their sawmill on Johns Road near the project parcel. In the early 1980s,a Naples area tradition,the Swamp Buggy Races, was moved from a locale it had occupied since 1953 on Radio Road to a larger modem facility at the newly created Florida Sports Park east of the intersection of 19 METHODOLOGY Prior to conducting fieldwork relevant archives and literature were reviewed. This included, but was not limited to, studying previous archaeological reports for sites in Collier County, reviewing information from the Master Site File in Tallahassee concerning nearby sites, and examining USGS maps of the project area. Also,black and white as well as color aerial photographs of the project area,which could aid in revealing anthropogenic changes to the topography and floral communities,were interpreted. These images were revisited and studied prior to the Phase II work. RESEARCH DESIGN Site 8CR1371 was one of two newly-discovered sites during Phase I and the only one containing intact cultural deposits. Of 31 shovel tests dug across the site nine were positive for prehistoric material but undisturbed cultural deposits were encountered in only three test holes. Although the site was largely disturbed, a small intact site area was determined to be potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP based on Criterion D. It was recommended that a Phase II assessment be conducted if that part of the site could not be avoided(Carr et al.2014). The objective of the Phase II testing of 8CR1371 was to determine the extent of intact cultural deposits,their stratigraphy, and the site significance. FIELDWORK A pedestrian survey was first conducted across the site to identify the locations of the three positive shovel tests (ST-271, 272 and 278) where cultural deposits were determined to be intact. Additional shovel tests were dug in the cardinal directions at 10 meter intervals from these positive tests. If a positive shovel test was encountered then additional shovel tests were dug at 5-meter and 2.5-meter intervals to establish site boundaries for the intact portion of 8CR1371. The shovel tests were excavated and bagged by 20cm levels or by context(if recognized). FS numbers were assigned to each level. All cultural material was collected or noted including modern refuse (nails, glass, etc.). Opening photographs were taken of all levels and closing plan and profile photos of each unit. All shovel tests were 50 cm in diameter excavated to a depth of 100 cm where possible. Additionally,two 1 x 2-meter units were excavated near the center of the site to recover a larger sample of cultural materials and permit the profiling of a broader horizontal area. These units were excavated to sterile or impenetrable zones. All dug sediments were screened through Y4"-mesh hardware cloth and all cultural materials were collected. 21 METHODOLOGY Prior to conducting fieldwork relevant archives and literature were reviewed. This included, but was not limited to, studying previous archaeological reports for sites in Collier County, reviewing information from the Master Site File in Tallahassee concerning nearby sites, and examining USGS maps of the project area. Also,black and white as well as color aerial photographs of the project area, which could aid in revealing anthropogenic changes to the topography and floral communities,were interpreted. These images were revisited and studied prior to the Phase II work. RESEARCH DESIGN Site 8CR1371 was one of two newly-discovered sites during Phase I and the only one containing intact cultural deposits. Of 31 shovel tests dug across the site nine were positive for prehistoric material but undisturbed cultural deposits were encountered in only three test holes. Although the site was largely disturbed, a small intact site area was determined to be potentially eligible for listing in the NRHP based on Criterion D. It was recommended that a Phase II assessment be conducted if that part of the site could not be avoided(Carr et al. 2014). The objective of the Phase II testing of 8CR1371 was to determine the extent of intact cultural deposits,their stratigraphy,and the site significance. FIELDWORK A pedestrian survey was first conducted across the site to identify the locations of the three positive shovel tests (ST-271, 272 and 278) where cultural deposits were determined to be intact. Additional shovel tests were dug in the cardinal directions at 10 meter intervals from these positive tests. If a positive shovel test was encountered then additional shovel tests were dug at 5-meter and 2.5-meter intervals to establish site boundaries for the intact portion of 8CR1371. The shovel tests were excavated and bagged by 20cm levels or by context(if recognized). FS numbers were assigned to each level. All cultural material was collected or noted including modem refuse (nails, glass, etc.). Opening photographs were taken of all levels and closing plan and profile photos of each unit. All shovel tests were 50 cm in diameter excavated to a depth of 100 cm where possible.Additionally,two 1 x 2-meter units were excavated near the center of the site to recover a larger sample of cultural materials and permit the profiling of a broader horizontal area. These units were excavated to sterile or impenetrable zones. All dug sediments were screened through'/."-mesh hardware cloth and all cultural materials were collected. 21 I . 3 i a i . 1 .. ...-.,.,, ... °6�LL j '1 I t I i ' `� r' 1 g, y � Y S a.� ' cif.. 1 Figure 8.2014 aerial photograph of 8CR1371 depicting site boundaries. =INTACT AREA OF SITE III■OVERALL AREA OF SITE INCLUDING DISTURBED CULTURAL DEPOSITS 0 33 88 132 Feet approx. O 10 20 40 Meters approx. 23 CR-951 DRAINAGE DITCH PEDESTRIAN/BICYCLE PAVED PATH , , ,' .. , I I r' , I r , ST-106 r II ST-273,.,,... '.'"'...r ,`., ST-280 El r r r , r•. ST-314 "• r r +' I , / ST120 • • .. ti , f ST-101t' S 8I,/ % ST-318 ST-272 ST-307 7 ST 312 ST-313 I ST-311' 57-260 III I:t 1 1 ► ST 2T9 #.4 ST-306 i �• • 0 ST©r* • ST-308 v u •` ST-309•0 0 ST4041 ST.317 5T416, fT18 81•2T7 ST-27 , ST*255 � t • • r / 0 $T-321 r�",•..* .. . ST-322 + jf� '''` • •* ST-323 ST-101 `'r`•• I ST-10 ST-110 ST-111 MI I ' U ill Figure 9.Map of intact site boundary and shovel tests at 8CR1371. ■=POSITIVE INTACT PHASE I SHOVEL TEST ‘%`....=BOUNDARY OF INTACT AREA OF SITE =POSITIVE INTACT PHASE II SHOVEL TEST II=POSITIVE DISTURBED SHOVEL TEST *=NEGATIVE SHOVEL TEST 2(*) I=1X2 METER UNIT 2.5 5 10 Meters approx. coNTOURa IN IOC*INTERVALS MAP BY JOHN o.aERiAULT 12.1e i4 0 8 16 32 Feet approx. 24 m a y�-Yw . gam ye f "F ,f '''',. ,,,,, ''''17-.. ,,,.410;14,.". ''',4°,1", 4 ;,* i * -It/44 ,, 141- a III iti ‘4t Figure 10.Noh wall of rt Test Unit 1. z '(///46 \ tt§ illi I' < " =`' Figure 11.View northwest at Ivy Andino and Mike Pujazon excavating Test Unit 2. 25 g-, .a W Figure 12.Test Unit 2 looking `` north. -, 31110 • ,. �. Figure 13.Test Unit 2 looking west y q $ 26 RESULTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A Phase II cultural resource assessment was performed at 8CR1371 in the Rockedge parcel in December, 2014. It was determined through systematic shovel testing and the excavation of two 1-meter x 2-meter test units that the extent of intact cultural deposits encompasses approximately 1/10 acre within a remnant hardwood hammock. The site measures approximately 37 meters in diameter. The criteria used by the archaeologists to determine the site's preservation quality was: 1. the absence within an archaeological context of modern refuse;2. the intactness of black midden soil in one or more contexts; 3. the presence of undisturbed prehistoric cultural material in one or more contexts. An additional 17 shovel tests were excavated in cardinal directions from the three positive tests dug during the Phase I assessment. Twelve contained intact cultural deposits. The vertical extent of intact cultural deposits averaged 20-40 cm across at least 80 percent of the site,with the depth of cultural material extending down in one instance in excess of 60 cm below surface to the top of limestone caprock and within some solution holes(Le. ST-307). A comparison of the midden deposit with other nearby sites such as the Buschelman Site, 8CR726, indicates that 8CR1371 is of moderate density in contrast to that site. Cultural material at 8CR1371 includes ceramics, faunal bone, and a small component of marine shell. The variability of the quantity of ceramics and worked deer long bones (Cf. ST- 322,Levels 2-3; ST-317,Levels 2-3)suggests different loci of activities across the site. A total of 580 pottery sherds were recovered. This suggests a period of intense use at the site during the Formative Period(ca.AD 500-1000). Sand-tempered plain dominated the ceramic sherds,but two sherds of an unclassified pinched rim were found in ST-321.The sherds occurred in a horizon 7-10 cm thick and generally into the second level. Only one other artifact, a bone point, was found. Faunal bone included deer, fresh water fish, reptiles,and amphibians. The boundaries of the site are characterized by a marked decrease or absence of prehistoric cultural material. It was observed that the northern edges of the site contain brown fill sand that has clumps of black midden soil interspersed with isolated artifacts such as ceramics and faunal bone. The edges of the other three site quadrants has midden soil containing prehistoric cultural material intermixed with modem refuse such as nails, glass, ceramics, fragments of ceramic tile, and automotive parts. North of the intact site area are the locales of the two destroyed structures. The disturbances include bulldozing, scraping, and filling likely concurrent with their demolition. The northern area of disturbance also lacked the underlying tabular limestone caprock found throughout the balance of the site suggesting that the most intensive disturbance lies to the north. The edges of the site contain an increase in an exotic floristic community owing to the proximity of a nursery to the immediate south. To the east of the site area are extensive disturbances characterized by holes,spoil piles,and other nursery-related intrusions. 27 Unit I was excavated on a small pedestalled area amid mature, high-canopy live oaks. Excavation was halted by a dense, impenetrable root mat, though the excavation had yielded one fragment of shell and only modern clay flower pot sherds, and it was determined that the rise is a recent spoil pile, likely the result of soil placed there for the nursery. The excavation of Unit 2 in the center of 8CR1371 yielded a moderate amount of prehistoric cultural material including ceramics, faunal bone,and marine shell in three of the four contexts. The top two were determined to be disturbed due to the presence of a small quantity of modern refuse. The excavation of this unit ended at 45 cm below ground surface in a sterile zone of manly limestone. Shovel testing adjacent to these two units determined that surfacial soil was likely removed across the site with minimal disturbance to the intact basal zones. Evidence of this removal could be seen in the lack of an accreted mantle and the immediate recovery of prehistoric material at the opening of each shovel test. Further evidence of intactness was noted in the presence of basal tabular solutioned limestone caprock throughout the central and southern portions of the site area. The presence of mature live oaks and cabbage palms lacking pedestals from clearing around their bases are another indication that the site area(Figures 8,9)is relatively undisturbed. It is recommended that the intact portion of site 8CR1371 be preserved if feasible. However, if preservation of all or parts of the site is not feasible then Phase III (mitigation)work should be conducted in the area of the site to be impacted. It is possible that human remains may occur on the site although none were encountered during our testing. If human remains are encountered then the Florida Division of Historical Resources should be notified in accordance with the provisions of Florida Statute 872.05. 28 yZ WW g iG •C. v igg ' 3 t0 s c N • ii o ih = m 0 $ g9 1 C to P 71 2 2 o 1 • i E 0 °° 0 a c E l *' 0 SG C9L o 0 o ° II u if u it II 0 W .- NM ..t. in tD „11- 1F- 0E- 1g o I oo i 8086 v u w ••D000 29 REFERENCES CITED Almy,MM and JG Deming 1982 Cultural Resources Survey of the Emerald Lakes Tract in Northwest Collier County,Florida.Archaeological Consultants Inc.,Sarasota FMSF#902. 1986a Archaeological Assessment Survey of Twelve Lakes,Collier County,Florida. Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota. 1986b Archaeological Assessment of Bretonne Park, Collier County, Florida Archaeological Consultants Inc., Sarasota. Beriault,JG 1973 A Preliminary Report on the Area Known as the Collier-Coral Ridge Tract, Southwest Florida. Unpublished Ms, on file at FMSF, Tallahassee and AHC, Miami. 1986 Report and Recommendations Concerning the Barron Collier Company Tract on Chokoloskee Island,Collier County,Florida,MS on file,AHC. 1987 Suggestions for a Collier County site Model, a report submitted to the Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, December 15th, 1987. MS on file, AHC. 1999 An Archaeological Survey of the Winding Cypress Project, Collier County, Florida. Report #7248 on file, Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee, Florida. 2002 A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the Newton Square Parcel, Collier County, Florida. Report #14174 on file, Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee,Florida. 2003a A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the Collier Regional Medical Center Parcel, Collier County, Florida. Report #9380 on file, Division of Historic Resources,Tallahassee,Florida. 2003b A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the Newton PUD Parcel, Collier County, Florida. Report #9393 on file, Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee, Florida. 2004a A Phase I Archaeological Assessment of the Feathers Parcel,Collier County, Florida. Report#12980 on file,Division of Historic Resources,Tallahassee, Florida. 30 2004b A Phase One Archaeological Assessment of the Newton Square Parcel,Collier County,Florida.AHC Technical Report#558. 2005 A Phase One Archaeological Assessment of the Toll-Rattlesnake Parcel,Collier County,Florida. Report#13377 on file,Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee,Florida. 2006 A Phase One Archaeological Assessment of the Collier Boulevard,C.R.951 Road Corridor,Interstate 75 to U.S.41,Collier County,Florida.Report#12980 on file, Division of Historic Resources,Tallahassee,Florida. 2007 A Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment of the San Marino Parcel, Collier County, Florida. Report #14563 on file, Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee, Florida. Beriault,JG,RS Carr,J Stipp,R Johnson,and J Meeder 1981 The Archaeological Salvage of the Bay West Site, Collier County, Florida. In Florida Anthropologist 34(20):39-58. Beriault,JG and C Strader 1984 A Preliminary Report on Stratigraphic Excavation on Chokoloskee Island, Florida.Southwest Florida Archaeological Society,MS on file,AHC. Beriault,John G.,David Boschi,Ryan Franklin and Joseph F.Mankowski 2006 Phase II Archaeological Investigations of the Lely#5 Site, 8CR751,Collier County,Florida.AHC Technical Report#771. Beriault,John G.,Steve Bertone,Robert S.Carr,Michelle Cotty Loger,Matthew Betz 2012 A Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment In the Northern Part of Rookery Bay National Estuarine Reserve, Collier County, Florida. Report #19738 on file, Division of Historic Resources,Tallahassee,Florida. Beriault,John G.,Robert S. Carr and Matthew Fenno 2012 A Phase One Cultural Resources Assessment of the Lord's Way 30 Parcel,Collier County, Florida. Report #19475 on file, Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee,Florida. Bullen,RP and AK Bullen 1956 Excavation on Cape Haze Peninsula, Florida. Contributions of the Florida State Museum. Social Sciences I, Gainesville,Florida. Carbone,V 1983 Late Quaternary Environments in Florida and the Southeast. Florida Anthropologist 36(1-2): 3-17. 31 Carr,RS 1986 Preliminary Report on Excavations at the Cutler Fossil Site 8DA2001 in Southern Florida.Florida Anthropologist 39(3,pt. 2):231-32. 2012 Digging Miami. University Press of Florida,Gainesville. Carr,RS and JG Beriault 1984 Prehistoric Man in South Florida. In PJ Gleason (ed), Environments of South Florida;Present and Past II. Coral Gables:Miami Geological Society,FL.pp. 1-14. Carr,Robert S.and Richard Haiduven 1990 An Archaeological Assessment of the Arete Golf Course Property, Collier County, Florida. Report #2605 on file, Division of Historic Resources, Tallahassee,Florida. Carr,RS and W Steele 1993 An Archaeological Survey and Assessment of the Lely Resort Properties, Collier County,FL. AHC Technical Report#70. Carr,RS and K Heinz 1996 Archaeological Excavations at the Ryder Pond Site, 8LL1850,Lee County,FL. April, 1986. Carr,Robert S.,Joseph F. Mankowski,David Boschi and John G. Beriault 2007 Archaeological Investigations of 8CR747 and 8CR750, Collier County, Florida. AHC Technical Report#782. Carr,Robert S.,John G.Beriault,Matthew Betz,Scott Faulkner and Joseph F. Mankowski 2008 Archaeological Monitoring at the Buschelman Site, 8CR726,Hawthorne II Parcel,Collier County,Florida.AHC Technical Report#841. Carr,Robert S. and Joseph F. Mankowski 2011 A Phase I Cultural Resources Assessment of the Hacienda lakes Parcels and Phase II Assessment of CR1164, Collier County, Florida. Report#20097 on file, Division of Historic resources,Tallahassee,Florida. Carr,Robert S.;Andrew J. Weidman;John Wesley White and John G. Beriault 2014 A Cultural Resource Assessment of the Rockedge Parcel,Collier County,Florida. AHC Technical Report#1024. Clausen,C and J Gifford 1975 Florida spring confirmed as 10,000 year old early man site. The Florida Anthropologist 8(3),Part 2. Cushing,FH 32 1897 Exploration of Ancient Key-Dwellers' Remains on the Gulf Coast of Florida. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, Philadelphia 35 (153): 1-329-448. Daniel,RI and M Wisenbaker 1987 Harney Flats. Baywood Publishing Company,Farmingdale,New York. Delcourt,H,DC West and PA Delacourt 1981 Forests of the Southeastern United States: Quantitative Maps For Aboveground Woody Biomass,Carbon,and Dominance of Major Tree Taxa.Ecology 62,no. 4. Ehrenhard,JE,RS Carr,and RC Taylor 1978 The Archaeological Survey of Big Cypress National Preserve: Phase I. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center,Tallahassee,Florida. 1979 The Big Cypress National Preserve: Archaeological Survey Season 2. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center,Tallahassee,Florida. Ehrenhard,JE and RC Taylor 1980 The Big Cypress National Preserve: Archaeological Survey Season 3. National Park Service,Southeast Archaeological Center,Tallahassee,Florida. Florida Preservation Services 1986 Historical/Architectural Survey of Collier County, Florida. Report #1108 on file, Division of Historic Resources,Tallahassee,Florida. Fradkin,A 1976 The Wightman Site:A Study of Prehistoric Culture and Environment on Sanibel Island, Lee County, Florida. M.A. Thesis, Department of Anthropology, University of Florida,Gainesville. Fuhrmeister,C,RI Austin,and H Hansen 1990 Cultural Resource Assessment Survey of the Collier Tract 22 Development Site, Collier County, Florida. Piper Archaeological Research Inc. St. Petersburg, Florida. FMSF 2423. Goggin,JM 1939 A Ceramic Sequence in South Florida.New Mexico Anthropologist 3:36-40. 1947 A Preliminary Definition of Archaeological areas and Periods in Florida. American Antiquity 13:114-127. 1949 The Archaeology of the Glades Area. Unpublished MS on file, SE Archaeological Research Center,NPS,Tallahassee, Fl. 33 1949 Cultural Traditions in Florida Prehistory. In J.W. Griffin (editor) The Florida Indian and his Neighbors. Winter Park,Florida: Rollins College. Goggin,JM and WC Sturtevant 1964 The Calusa: A Stratified, Nonagricultural Society (with notes on sibling marriage). In W Goodenough (editor) Explorations in Cultural Anthropology: Essays in Honor ofGeorge Peter Murdock New Yoilc:McGraw Hill.Pp.179-29L Griffin,John W. 1988 The Archaeology of Everglades National Park: A Synthesis. Southeastern Frontiers,Tallahassee. Hrdlicka,A 1922 The Anthropology of Florida. Deland, Florida: Publications of the Florida State Historical Society 1. Kroeber,AL 1939 Cultural and Natural Areas in Native North America. Berkeley: University of California Press. Lee,AR,JG Beriault,W Buschelman,J Belknap 1993 A Small Site - Mulberry Midden, 8CR697 - Contributes to Knowledge of the Transitional Period. The Florida Anthropologist 46:43-52. Lee,AR,JG Beriault,J Belknap,WM Buschelman,AL Snapp and SW Thompson 1997 Salvage Excavation of an Archaic Period Special-Purpose Site in Collier County. The Florida Anthropologist 50:11-24. 1988 Heineken Hammock, 8CR231: A Late Archaic Corridor Site in Collier County. Southwest Florida Archaeological Society.Naples,Florida. Mankowski,Joseph F.,John G.Beriault,Craig Weaver and Mark Lance 2006 An Archaeological Investigation of the Buschelman Site (8CR726) and the Lely Site Number 6(8CR752),Collier County,Florida.AHC Technical Report#723. Marquardt,WH 1984 The Josslyn Island Mound and its Role in the Investigation of Southwest Florida's Past. Gainesville:Florida State Museum,Department of Anthropology, Miscellaneous Project Report Series 22. 1987 The Calusa Social Formation in Protohistoric South Florida. In T.C.Patterson and C.W.Galley(editors) Power Relations and State Formation. Washington,D.C.: Archaeology Section,American Anthropological Association,pp.98-116. 1988 Politics and Production Among the Calusa of South Florida. In T. Ingold, D. Riches,and J. Woodburn(editors) Hunters and Gatherers 1:History, Evolution, 34 and Social Change. London:Berg Publishers,pp. 161-188. 1992 Recent Archaeological and Paleoenvironmental Investigations in Southwest Florida. In W.H.Marquardt(editor), Culture and Environment in the Domain of the Calusa. Gainesville: Institute of Archaeology and Paleoenvironmental Studies,Monograph 1,University of Florida,pp. 9-58. Milanich,3T.and CH Fairbanks 1980 Florida Archaeology. New York:Academic Press. Morrell,R.L. 1969 Fiber-tempered Pottery from Southwestern Florida. Abstract of presented paper, American Anthropological Association Annual Meeting,New Orleans,on file at AHC. Russo,M 1990 Report I on Archaeological Investigations by the Florida Museum of Natural History at Horrs Island,Collier County,Florida.FMSF 2353. Scholl,DW,FC Craighead,and M Stuiver 1969 Florida Submergence Curve Revisited: Its Relation to Coastal Sedimentation Rates. Science 163: 562-564. Sears, W 1967 Archaeological Survey of the Cape Coral Area at the Mouth of the Caloosahatchee River. The Florida Anthropologist 20: 93-102. 1982 Fort Center:An Archaeological Site in the Lake Okeechobee Basin. Gainesville: University of Florida Press. Stirling,MW 1931 Mounds of the Vanished Calusa Indians of Florida. Smithsonian Institution Explorations and Field Work for 1930: 167-172. 1933 Report of the Chief.Bureau of American Ethnology Annual Report 48:3-21. 1936 Florida Cultural Affiliations in Relation to Adjacent Areas. In Essays in Anthropology in Honor of Alfred Louis Kroeber. Berkeley: University of California Press,pp 351-357. Taylor,RC 1984 Everglades National Park Archaeological Inventory and Assessment Season 2: Interim Report. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee,Florida. 35 1985 Everglades National Park Archaeological Inventory and Assessment Season 3: Interim Report. National Park Service, Southeast Archaeological Center, Tallahassee,Florida. U.S.Department of Agriculture 2014 Web Soil Survey Website: http://websoilsurvey.nres,usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx Washington,D.C. Widmer,R.J. 1983 The Evolution of the Calusa, a Non-agricultural Chiefdom on the Southwest Florida Coast. Ph.D. thesis, Pennsylvania State University, distributed by University Microfilms International,Ann Arbor,Michigan. 1996 Recent Excavations at the Key Marco Site, 8CR48, Collier County, Florida. The Florida Anthropologist 49:10-26. Williams,JL 1837 The Territory of Florida.Gainesville:University Press of Florida. 36 APPENDIX I: SHOVEL TEST LOG 37 APPENDIX I: SHOVEL TEST LOG—8CR1371 PHASE II ST 308(Positive,Redeposited) 10 meters north of ST-306 at edge of canopy 0-30cm Brown fill sand,bits of limestone,disturbed 30-60cm Fill sand mixed with bits of redeposited midden,2 sherds of ceramics(FS- 10) 60-100cm Sandy limestone marl with calcinated palm root fragments,undisturbed, no cultural material ST 309(Positive,Redeposited),5 meters south of ST308,offset slightly to avoid palm tree(FS-11 thru 13) 0-20cm Disturbed brown fill sand,fragment of concrete block,small paste sherd of ceramics(FS-11) 20-40cm Bits of limestone fill from road,disturbed,recent refuse 40-60cm Disturbed brown sand,no cultural material 60-80cm Disturbed brown sand,no cultural material ST 310(Positive,Intact)2.5 meters north of ST-306 0-10 cm Black silty surface sand, disturbed 10-17cm Limestone marl fill,likely road 17-40cm Black undisturbed midden soil, 1 pc.faunal bone(FS-15) 40-60cm Grayer silty soil,undisturbed 3 pc. faunal bone,4 paste ceramic sherds (FS-16) ST 311(Positive,Redeposited) 10 meters north of ST-307,NW portion of site 0-20cm Homogeneous silty gray sand 20-40cm Homogeneous silty gray sand,2 sherds ceramics,modem refuse,rusty metal,plastic(FS-17) 40-60cm Brown sand,no cultural material ST 312(Positive,Intact)5 meters north of ST-307 0-20cm Silty black midden soil 6 sherds ceramics(FS-18),no modem refuse 20-40cm Silty black midden soil,4 sherds ceramics(FS-19),no modem refuse ST 313(Positive,Intact), 2.5 meters north of ST-312 0-20cm Gray-black silty,loamy soil,undisturbed,ceramics(FS-20),no modem refuse 20-40cm Gray-black silty, loamy soil,undisturbed,ceramic paste sherds(FS-21), no modem refuse 38 20-40cm Brown-black soil,one fragment Spisula shell,one paste sherd(FS-24), undisturbed,no modern refuse ST 315(Positive,Intact) 5 meters south of ST-271, immediately north of trail 0-20cm Black silty midden soil, I sm.pc.of faunal bone(FS-25) 20-40cm Black silty midden soil,9-10.pc.of faunal bone(FS-26) 40-60cm Lightening to Brownish-black silty sand, abundant ceramics,2 pc.faunal bone (FS-27),no modem refuse throughout unit ST 316(Positive,Intact)5 meters south of ST-271,2 meters south of trail 0-20cm Undisturbed black midden soil,massive lateral oak roots,no cultural material 20-40cm Undisturbed black midden soil,ceramics,deer bone(FS-28) ST 317(Positive,Disturbed(upper)/Intact(lower))5 meters south of ST-316,2.5 meters north of ST104 0-20cm Black silty soil,abundant modem refuse including small ceramic glazed tile squares, glass,plastic,no prehistoric material(FS-29) 20-40cm Abundant large fragments of split deer bone.ceramics,one sm.pc.plastic, little disturbance(FS-30) 40-60cm Lighter,brown-black silty sand,small amount of ceramics,faunal bone(FS- 31) 60cm Limestone caprock ST 318(Positive,Intact) 10 meters south of ST-307,just north of trail 0-20cm Black silty and sandy soil, small bits of limestone,large pc. of recent limestone gravel(FS-32) 20-40cm Black silty and sandy soil,no cultural material,no modem refuse 40-60cm Grayer silty sand,4-5 sherds ceramics,undisturbed(FS-33) ST 319(Negative,Intact) 5 meters south of ST-318,2 meters south of trail 0-20cm Silty black soil,no cultural material 20-40cm Silty black soil turning grayer with depth,no cultural material 40-60cm Trending to medium brown sand,no cultural material ST 320(Positive,Disturbed)5 meters west of ST-313 0-20cm Silty black soil,abundant mirrored concave glass fragments(from headlights?), 1 pc.faunal bone, 1 frag. from apple snail(FS-34) 20-40cm Gray sandy limestone marl increasing in density to caprock,more modem refuse(FS-35) 39 0-20cm Silty black soil,abundant mirrored concave glass fragments(from headlights?), 1 pc.faunal bone, 1 frag.from apple snail(FS-34) 20-40cm Gray sandy limestone marl increasing in density to caprock,more modem refuse(FS-35) ST 321(Positive,Intact) 5 meters east of ST-271 0-20cm Dark gray sandy midden soil,very abundant ceramics(FS-36) 20-40cm Dark gray sandy midden soil, 1 small rounded pc.brown quartz(modem refuse?),moderate amount of ceramics(FS-37) 40-60cm Gray-brown,sandier soil,small amount of ceramics(FS-38) 63cm Limestone caprock,no modem refuse on any levels ST 322(Positive,Intact)2.5 meters east of ST-321,2.5 meters east of ST-109 locale 0-20cm Dark gray silty sand, 1 pc. faunal bone,3pc.ceramics(FS-39) 20-40cm Dark to medium-gray silty sand with sand lightening to gray sand,small quantity of ceramics(FS-40) 40-60cm Gray sand,moderate amount of ceramics(FS-41) 60cm Limestone caprock,no modem refuse on any level ST323(Positive,Disturbed)5 meters east of ST-278, 5 meters NW of ST-110 0-20cm Black silty soil,pieces of concrete rubble,faunal bone(FS-42) 20-40cm Abrupt change to compact light tan sand at 24 cm,no cultural material 40cm Limestone caprock 40 APPENDIX II: FIELD SPECIMEN LOG 41 Rockedge Phase II: 2010.141 Field Specimen Log FS Provenience Level/depth Description Date Collected by STP body(107);STP rim(1);bone point 1 Unit 1,Context A Level 1 (1);faunal bone(85.6 g); shell(279 g); 12/4/2014 SHC;MP charcoal(2.5 g); UID iron and modem refuse 2 Unit 1,Context B Level 1 STP body(19);faunal bone(3.3 g);shell 12/5/2014 SHC;MP (3.2 g) 3 Unit 1,Context A Level 2 STP body(37);faunal bone(32.4 g);soil 12/5/2014 SHC;MP sample 4 Unit 1,Context B Level 2 STP body(1) 12/5/2014 SHC; MP 5 Unit 1,Context C Level 2 STP body(5);faunal bone(8.8 g);soil 12/5/2014 SHC; MP sample 8 Unit 2 Level 1 Shell(36.4 g);flower pot sherds(16); UID 12/5/2014 SHC;MP Iron(2) 7 Unit 28 Level 2 STP body(1); UID green plastic(1) 22/10/2014 IA,MP,JB STP body(27);UID body incised(3);shell 8 ST 306 50x50 cm 55.3 g); UID iron(7) 12/11!2014 MP,JB 9 ST 307,2 meters 50x50cm STP body(39);faunal bone(18.9 g);shell 12/11/2014 MP,JB N.of ST 272 (3.5 g);charcoal(2.5 g) 10 ST 308 30 cm STP body(1); charcoal(1.9 g) 12/15/2014 SF,IA,JB 11 ST 309 Level 1 0-20 STP body(2) 12/15/2014 SF,IA,JB cm) 12 St 309 Level c2(20-40 shell(8 g) 12/15/2014 SF,IA,JB 13 ST 309 Level c3(4 0-60 shell(7.8 g) 12/15/2014 SF, IA,JB level 1 (0-20 limestone(3) 12115!2014 SF,IA,JB 14 ST 310 cm) 15 ST 310 Level m)0- 40 STP body(1);faunal bone(<5 g) 12/15/2014 SF,IA,JB 16 ST 310 Level 3(,(40-60 STP body(4);faunal bone(2.5 g) 12/15/2014 SF,IA,JB Level 2(20-40 SW body(2);UID iron 12/15/2014 IA,SF, IA 17 ST 311 cm) 18 ST 312 level 1 (0-20 STP body(7) 12/15/2014 SF, IA,JB cm) 19 ST 312 Level 2(20-40 STP body(2) 12/15/2014 SF,IA,JB cm) 20 ST 313 Level 1 (0-20 STP body(2) 12/15/2014 SF,IA,JB cm) Level 2(20-40 STP body(6) 21 ST 313 ) 12/15/2014 SF, IA,JB 22 ST 313 Level 3 j 0- 60 STP body(2) 12/15/2014 SF,IA,JB ST 314(5 m west Level 1 (0-20 UID Iron 12/15/2014 SF,IA,JB 23 of ST 307) cm) 24 ST 314 Level 2(20-40 STP body(1);snail(7.9 g);shell(8.9 g) 12/15/2014 SF,IA,JB cm) 42 26 ST 315 Level(20 40 Faunal bone(7,2 g) 12/16/2014 IA,SF,JB m) 27 ST 315 Level 3(40-60 STP body(50);faunal bone(4.8 g); 12/18/2014 JB, IA,SF cm) charcoal(2.8 g) 28 ST 318 Level c2(2 0-40 STP body(5);faunal bone(6.3 g) 12/16/2014 JB,IA,SF Level 1 (0-20 STP body(2);faunal bone(18.1 g);red 29 ST 317 ochre(3);modem brown glass(3);modern 12/16/2014 JB, IA,SF cm) tiles 1 x 1 cm(4) 30 ST 317 Level 2(20-40 STP body(14);faunal bone(56 g); 12118!2014 JB, IA,SF cm) charcoal 3.3 g) 31 Phase II,ST 317 Level m)0- 60 STP body(8);faunal bone(1.8g) 12/16/2014 JB,IA,SF 32 Phase II,ST 318 Level 1 (0-20 STP body(1); lithic(2) 12/16/2014 JB,IA,SF 32 Phase II,ST 318 Level (40-60 SW body(4) 12/16/2014 JB,IA,SF Level 1 (0-20 faunal bone(2.6 g);snail shell(1);modem 34 ST 320 cm) mirror frags(16);modern brown glass(5) 12!16/2014 JB, IA,SF 35 ST 320 Level 2(20-40 Pieces of mirror(4) 12!16/2014 JB, IA,SF m) Level 1 (0-20 STP body(114);STP rim(3);unclassified 36 ST 321 cm) pinched rim(2);charcoal(11.6 g) 12/16/2014 JB, IA,SF 37 ST 321 Level (20-40 STP body(43);charcoal(16.4 g) 12/1812014 JB, IA,SF 38 ST 321 Level 3n(�0-60 STP body(7);charcoal(1.9 g) 12/16/2014 JB, IA,SF 39 ST 322 Level 1 (0-20 STP body(19);wood(1) 12/16/2014 JB,IA, SF cm) 40 ST 322 Level c2,20 -40 STP body(8);faunal bone(3.3 g) 12/16/2014 JB,IA,SF 41 ST 322 Level c3('0-60 STP body(12);faunal bone (3.1 g) 12116!2014 JB,IA,SF level 1 (0-20 STP body(27) 42 ST 323 cm) 12/18/2014 JB,IA,SF 43 APPENDIX III: FLORIDA SURVEY LOG 44 Page 1 Ent 0(FMSF only) zt' ;_{� . Survey Log Sheet Survey#(FMSF only) 1 Florida Master She File Version 4.1 1107 Consult Cold*to the Savoy Loy Shut for detailed instructions. Identification and Bibliographic Information Survey Project(name and protect phase) 8CR1371,Phase II 2014.196 Report Title(a)1acdy as on title page) A Phase II Cultural Resource Assessment of Rockedge #2, 8CR1371, Collier County, Florida Report Authors(as on title page,last names first) 1. Carr, Robert S. 3. 2. Beriault, John G. 4. Publication pate(year) 2015 Total Number of Pages in Report(count text,figures,tables,not site forms) 43 Publication Information(Give series,number in series,publishes and city.For article or chapter,cite page numbers.Use the style of American Antiquity.) AHC Technical Report #1044 Supervisors of Fieldwork(even if same as author) Names Carr, Robert S. Affiliation of Fieldwarkers: Organization Archaeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. City Davie Key WordslPhrases(Don't use county name,or common words like archaeology,structure,survey,architecture,etc.) 1. Rattlesnake Hammock 3.Henderson Marsh 5. 7. 2. Sabel Palm Road 4. 5. 8. Surrey Sponsors(corporation,government unit,organization or person directly funding fieldwork) Name Waterman of Rockedge, LLC Organization AddresslPhonelE•mail Recorder of Log Sheet Beriault, John G. Date Log Sheet Completed 1-1e-2015 Is this survey or project a continuation of a previous project? ONo ®Yes: Previous survey Bs(FMSF only) Mapping Counties(tat each one in which field survey was done;attach additional sheet if necessary) 1. Collier 3. 5. 2. 4. 6. USGS 1:24,000 Map NameslYear of Latest Revision(attach additional sheet if necessary) 1.Name SRLLe BRACE Year 1991 4.Name Year 2.Nana Year 5.Name Year 3.Name Year 8.Name Year Description of Survey Area Dates for Fieldwork: Start 12-4-2014 End 12-16-2014 Total Area Surveyed(fit M one) hectares o.1 acres Number of Distinct Tracts or Areas Surveyed i If Corridor(till in one for each) Width: meters feet Length: kilometers miles HRBEOBBR0107 Florida Masts Site Flee,Oiriaiox at Historical aewlreu,Grey edldiag,500 Stith Oronoerh Street,Tefehauw,Florida 32399-0250 Phone 850.245.0440,FAX ae0.246-e439,End:SitaF9aOda.atate.Rua Page 2 Survey Log Sheet Survey# Research and Field Methods Types of Survey(check an that apply): elarchaeological ❑architectural ®historicaWerchival underwater ❑damage assessment ❑monitoring report ❑other(desc ibel: ScopellntensitylProcedures Shovel tests, units Preliminary Methods(check as many as apply to the project as a whole) ❑Florida Archives(Gray Building) ❑library research-local pubic ['local property or tax records Pother historic mops ['Florida Photo Archives(Gray S ildadg) ❑library•spocfal collection-oaadocal ['newspaper files ( soils maps or data ❑Site File property search l81Pubec Lands Survey(maps at DEP) ©Ilterature search [windshield survey FISito File survey search Decal informent(s) ❑Sanborn Insurance maps ( eeriel photography Bother(describe): Archaeological Methods(check as many as apply to the project as a whole) ['Check here if NO archaeological methods were used. ❑surface collection,controlled ['shovel test-other screen size ❑block excavation(at least 2x2 ml ❑surface collection,uncontrolled Duster screen ❑soil resistivity shovel test•1 f4"screen ['pesthole teats ❑magnetometer Oshovel test-1 fe"screen ❑auger tests ❑side scan sonar ❑shovel test 1118"screen Deering ['pedestrian survey ❑shove)test•dmecreened [ghost excavation(at least 1x2 m) ['unknown Clotho(describe): HistoricallArchitectural Methods(check as many as apply to the project as a whole) Check here if NO historicallarchitectural methods were used. ['building permits ❑demolition permits ❑neighbor interview ❑subdivision maps ❑commatcia)permits exposed ground inspected ❑occupant interview Otis records ❑bderior documentation ❑local property records ❑occupation permits ❑unknown Pother(describe): Survey Results{cultural resources recorded) Site Significance Evaluated? IlYes ❑Ne Count of Previously Recorded Sites i Count of Newly Recorded Sites o Previously Recorded Site air's with Site File Update Forms/List site N's without"8".Attach additional pages if necessary.) CR1371 Newly Recorded Site ill's(Are all originals and not updates?List site re without"8".Attach additional pages if necessary.) Site Forms Used: ❑Site File Paper Form ®Site File Electronic Recording Form h REOUIREO:ATTACH PLOT OF SURVEY AREA ON PHOTOCOPY OF USGS 1:24,000 MAP(S)*lib I SHPO USE ONLY SIIPO USE ONLY SHPO USE ONLY Odphs of Report 0872 ❑CARL DOW 131A321 0/Academic ❑Contract ❑Avocatioltel ❑Brant Project R DCo plience Review: CRAT N Type of Document ❑Archaeological Survey ❑HistericaNArchitectural Survey ❑Madre Survey ❑Col Tower CRAS ❑Monitoring Report Dfherview °Excavation Report ❑Muld•Site Excavation Report ❑Structure Detailed Report Man Hist.or Archival Doc DAPS I:MLIMRA ❑ro ❑tithe: Document Destination: PbUbility HABE088R0107 Florida Master Sits Fie,Division of Hltadcal Raeoweee,Grey Bating,500 South Breaeugh Street,Teeahassn,Florida 32390.0250 Phone 850.2454440,FAX 8504245.6439,Emit Sllefileedes.stete fl.us APPENDIX IV: FLORIDA SITE FORM - 8CR1371 48 Page 1 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM Site#e coo 1371 ,, '-r.• Field Date 12-16-2014 ❑Original • FLORIDA MASTER SITE FILE Form Date 1-18-2015 ®Update Version 4.0 1/07 Recorder# Consult Guide to Archaeological Site Form for detailed instructions Site Name(s) Rockedge 112 Multiple Listing(DHR only) Project Name Rockedge #2, 8CR1371, Phase II Survey#(DHR only) Ownership:Idvate-pro it❑pdvate-nonproltt❑pdvato-individual❑private•nonspeclfic OcAy Dainty ❑state❑federal Dfetive American Qoreign ❑unknown LOCATION & NIAI'I'lN( USGS 7.5 Map Name BELLE MEADa USGS Date 1991 Plat or Other Map City/Town(wit in 3 miles)Lely Estates In City Limits? Oyes ®no Ounknown County collier Township sos Range a6E Section 23 '/,section:I.3 W ®SW ❑SE DIE Irregular-name: Township Range Section. '/,section:❑NW ❑SW ❑SE DIE Landgrant Tax Parcel# UTM Coordinates:Zone 016 017 Easting( 1 1 1 1 1 1 Northing MEMil Other Coordinates: X: Y: Coordinate System&Datum Address/Vicinity/Route to: South on Collier Blvd. (CR 951) to Sabal Palm Road intersection. Site lies 200 meters north-northeast of that intersection Name of Public Tract(e.g..park) TYPE OF SI I'1 ( elect iii that apply) SETTING STRUCTURES OR FE4TURES = FUNCTION Wand(terrestrial) liWefand(petustdne) ❑log boat ❑fort 0road segment ®campsite ❑LakelPond(Washing) D suallyflooded ❑agricffarm building Omklden ❑aheli midden Ig]extractive site 13R1vedStream(Creek(fluorine) ['usually dry ❑burial mound ❑ma ❑shell mound 0hablletion(prehistoric) BTidel(estuarine) ❑Cave/Sink(subterranean) ❑building remains Omission ❑shlpwradt ❑homestead(hisbric) Saltwater(marine) rreetriel Qeemeterylgrave ['mound,nonspecific ['subsurface features I ['farmstead Paquette ❑dwnphefuse ❑plantailon Osurfecescatter i Quagga(prehistoric) ❑earthworks(historic)❑,Morro mound Owes 1 ❑town(historic) Other Features or Functions(Choose Mom the list or type a response.) ❑quarry 1. 2. CIILTFUIZI? Pt�'12101)S (select ail that appl1) ABORIGINAL, ❑Englewcod QMRanasola ❑SL Johns(nonspedmc) OSwlft Creek(nonspecifc) LION ABORIG!NA j aAlachue ❑Fort Walton ❑Nassisalpplan Oat.Johns I ❑Swift Creek,Early ❑First Spanish 1513-99 rehab(nonspecific) QGledes(nonspecific) ❑Mount Taylor ❑St.Johns!! ❑Swat Creek,Late ❑First Spanish 1609419 ❑Archaic.Early ©Glades I 1�Noswood me Rose ❑Transitional ['First Spanish 17001783 rehab,Middle ElGlades II pOrarrge ania Rosa Swig Creek OWeeden Island(nonspecific) ❑First Spanish(nonspecMc) rohab,Earle ❑Glades Ill ❑Paleoindlen ❑Seminole(nonspecific) ❑Weeden Island I OBrilish 17631783 Glade Hickory Pond ❑Pensacola ❑Sarninole Colonization ❑Weeden island lI t ❑Second Spanish 1783-1821 Ades pond Leon-efferson ❑Pedco Island ❑Seminole:let War To 2nd ❑Prehistoric(nonspecific) i American Territorial 1821-45 Ise atolls Malabar I ❑Safety Harbor ❑Seminole:2nd War To 3rd ❑Prehistoric nonceramlc ❑American CM War 1881-65 epCmro ❑ttalebar n ❑si.Augustine ❑Seminole:3rd War 8 After OPrehbtoric ceramic + ❑American 191h Century ' OAmedcan 20th Century Other Cultures(Choose from the fiat or type a response.For historic ales,give specific dates.) (]American(nonspecific) 1. 3, ❑Ahican•Americen 2. 4. OPINION OF RF.SOt l4('F. SICNtFICAN(.'F Potentially eligible individually for National Register of Historic Places? Oyes Ono ❑insufficient information Potentially eligible as contributor to a National Register district? Dyes One elnsumaentkrfonneton Explanation of Evalua tion(required revaluated;use separate sheet If needed) Largely intact intense interior midden. Recommendations for Owner or SHPO Action Preservation or Phase III mitigation DHR USE ONLY OFFICIAL EVALUATION DHR USE ONLY NR Ust Date SHPO-Appears to meet criteria for NR listing:Oyes DO ❑insufficient info Date Init. KEEPER-Determined eligible: Oyes Do Date D()wrier Objection NR Criteria for Evaluation: ❑a Ob ❑c Od (see National Register Bulletin 15,p.2) HR8E045R0107 Florid.MabrSIM FlIs f Div.of Hbtalal Ramiro),I R.A.Gray Bldg MO 8 Breeough St,Tetshassre,FL 32399.0221 Rote(850)24581401 Fax(050}21584391 Emdl SItsFssdoathM.fLue Page 2 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE FORM Site#8 CRD1371 FI I 1 0 11Iit I I()115 (select all Thal a) ,l>) SITE DETECTION SITE BOUNDARY Ono field check ❑exposed ground ❑screened shovel Abounds unknown 0 remote sensing ❑unsaeened shovel ['literature search Oposthole tests ®screened shovel•tu^ ❑none by recorder ['exposed ground Oscreened shovel ['informant report Danger tests ❑screened shovel-hrr ❑hterature search Oposthole tests ❑block excavations ['remote sensing Dunscreened shovel ❑screened shovel-uHs^ ❑informant report ❑auger tests ❑estimate or guess Other methods;number,size,depth,pattern of units;screen size(attach site plan) 17 50-cm. systematic shovel tests. two 1x2- meter unite Extent Size(m 1,370 Depth/stratigraphy of cultural deposit 20-60 cm average Temporal Interpretation-Components(check one): ❑single component l imultiple component ❑uncertain Describe each occupation In plan(refer to attached large scale map)and stratigraphically. Discuss temporal and functional interpretations: Integrity-Overall disturbance: ❑none seen Ominor ®substantial Omajor ❑redeposited ❑destroyed-docunentl ❑unknown Disturbances I threats I protective measures future development Surface collection: area collected m2 #collection units t Excavation: #noncontiguous blocks 112111 1( Is Total Artifacts It Ocount Oestimate Surface# Subsurface# COLLECTION SELECTIVITY ARTIFACT CATEGORIES and DISPOSITIONS „tact a disposition from the list below for ❑Unknown l unseledive(aNartifacts) A - Aboriginal ceramics each artifact cetaporll selected atleft ❑selective(some artifacts) A - Bone-animal or unidentif ❑mixed selectivity A - Shell-Unworked A-category always collected SPATIAL CONTROL A - Lithice S-some items in category collected ❑uncotiected Egeneral(not by subarea) — 0-observed MI hand,but not collected ❑unknowm ❑controtied(by subarea) - R-colected and subsequently lest site ['variable spatial control I -Informant reported category present ❑other(describe in comments below) U-unknown Artifact Comments Material coneietant with Glades I and II Periods DIAGNOSTICS(type or mode,and frequency:e.g.,Suwanee ppk,heat-treated cher(Deptford Check-stamped,ironstone/whiteware) 1. N. 4. N; 7. N= 2. N= 5. N= 8. N. 3. N= 6.. N= 9. N. I N\IRO\\11•.\I Nearest fresh water:Type wetland Name Distance from site(m) 30 Natural community UPLAND HARDWOODS Topography Hammock-wetland Elevation:Min 4 m Max 5 m Local vegetation Live Oak, cabbage palm, remnant tropical hardwood underatory, emerging exotica Present land use vacant SCS soil series Pined* fine sand. limestone eubetratum Soil association DO( t \lF\I ■lIt)\ Accessible Documentation Not Filed with the Site File-Including field notes,analysis notes,photos,plans and other Important document Docurenttype All materials at one location Malntalntgorganizaden Archaeological and Historical Conservancy,inc. 1)Document description He or accession Vs Document type Malnlalnkrg organization 2'Document dosed,ton Fife or accession its Rl1( ()RI)I.R X I\F(lli\1:1\I I\I()R\i.1110\ Informant Information:Name Address l Phone r E-mal Recorder Information:Name Beriault, John 0. AMllaeon .Archaeological and Historical Conservancy,Inc. Address i Phone lE•mal 4800 Sri 64th Avenuue, Davie, FL 33314 (954)793-9776 archlglebellaouth.net Required 0 PHOTOCOPY OF 7.5'USGS QUAD MAP WITH SITE BOUNDARIES MARKED and SITE PLAN Attachments Plan at 1:3,600 or larger. Show boundaries,scale,north arrow,testicollection units,landmarks and date. 1 ' . / r . if I 4 r^ . Fr I • / . !' ..+- I .. ,.4- ! rat i .� ``. 'ice 14 a '•,,. t •;• • • • • • t ! IF *• • • • .r • ... . • • • B ••• • :: • '• e• • • • 8CR1371 A¢. ,, , .',.. 1 ; .. 1 L `fib TO lb as r 1, USGS map of the Rockedge parcel showing location of Rockedge#2,8CR1371. iiiiiiiEl.n5i -ti + TOWNSHIP 50S,RANGE 28E,SECTION 23 0 1/8 1/4 1!2 Mile approx, USGS Map: BELLE MEADE,REV.1991 0 .2 .4 .8 Km.approx, ENGINEERING October 9, 2015 Mr. Daniel Smith,AICP Principal Planner Collier County Zoning Division 2800 Horseshoe Drive North Naples, FL 34104 Subject: Rockedge(PUDR)-PL20140002246 Planned Unit Development to PUD Rezone Submittal#3 Dear Mr.Smith: In response to your insufficiency letter dated September 10, 2015, please find enclosed the following items in support of the response for the above subject project: 1) Seventeen (17)copies of this response letter; 2) Seventeen (17) copies of the Master Plan in 24"x 36"format&One(1)copy of the Master Plan in 8 '/2"x 11"format; 3) Two(2)copies of the Covenants of Unified Control,signed& notarized; 4) Two(2)copies of the Affidavits of Authorization,signed&notarized; 5) Seventeen (17)copies of the completed Exhibits A—F,'Clean'version; 6) Seventeen (17)copies of the completed Exhibits A—F,'Strike—Thru& Underlined'version; 7) Seventeen (17)copies of the Deviation Justifications; 8) Seventeen (17)copies of the Typical Right-of-Way Exhibit; 9) Two(2)copies of the Archaeological Exhibit; 10) Four(4)copies of the Environmental Supplement Report; 11) Four(4)copies of the Environmental Exhibits; and 12) One(1)electronic copy of the entire submittal. In reply to your review comments,we offer the following responses in bold: Zoning Review—Reviewed By:Daniel Smith Correction Comment 1: 10.02.02 F.2.b. Application determine incomplete Rev. 1: Reference Application pg. 5 of 16: Please revise the adjacent zoning and land use table, zoning is not correct/complete on north, south an east (add TTRVC or Ag as applicable), land use is not correct/complete north, south, east and west. Please include name of applicable PUD's for zoning and actual use for land use portion and include ROW's when/where applicable. 6610 Willow Park Drive Suite 200 Naples,FL 34109 I (239) 597-0575 I Fax (239) 597-0578 www.consult-rwa.com Rev. 2: Please add Melrose Lane ROW as a use to the west. Response: Melrose Lane ROW has been added as requested. Correction Comment 2: 10.02.02 F.2.b.Applications determined incomplete. Rev. 1: Reference Affidavit of Authorization, please provide both project name and PL#at the top of the forms. Please also provide authorization from East Naples Fire District. Rev. 2: Affidavit of Authorization is not in packet. Please submit. Response: Affidavits and covenants of unified control attached hereto. The Fire District and Mason designate authority to Eddy Garcia via the covenants,and Eddy designates Sean Martin,Anderson and Patrick Vanasse as agents. This was discussed with the COA and is satisfactory. Correction Comment 3: 10.02.02 F.2.b.Application determined incomplete Rev. 1: Reference PUD doc, Exhibit B, max. actual building height for multi-family; please indicate why the provisions include 3 stories over parking. Is the intention to start building height measurement at the beginning of habitable floors (not including parking area(s))? Please also indicate if note 1 is needed/required for townhouse unit type (min. lot width is already at 16 feet). Please also (as noted in the landscape review)add LBE's to note 6. Rev. 2: Please submit a typical elevation of multi-family buildings meeting the 3 story, 55' height over parking standard and a site plan showing an example of lots requiring 25%less width due to roadway curve. Response: As discussed, the "3 stories over parking" was carried forward from the existing PUD document. We have deleted that reference from the development standards table. It should be noted that the existing PUD does not contain a Zoning Height and Actual Height measurement. We have not increased the zoned height measurement, but as customarily done we have increased the actual height limit by 10' to account for mechanicals such as an elevator shaft and architectural embellishments, which are not measured as part of zoned height. The footnote associated with the reduced lot width has been revised to 20%. Page 2 of 16 K.\2012\120030.00.04 Rockedge RPUD-Zoning&13RP\0007 RPUD Zoning Amendment Application Support V'UDA 2nd Insufficiency\2015-10-09 Submittal 53\01-2015-10-09 PURR Response Letter Submittal 113.docx ENGIM1EF&I.G� Correction Comment 4: 10.02.02 F.2.b.Application determined incomplete Rev. 1: Please revise the entire Master Plan so that it is readable and reproducible at 8.5x11 black and white format. Rev.2: Print not legible. Please use a larger font. Maybe use more than 1 page to illustrate clearly the master plan. Response: As discussed, it appears as though you were not provided the revised site plan included in our 1st resubmittal. The revised site plan,broken down onto 2 pages is attached. Correction Comment 5: 10.02.02 F.2.b.Application determined incomplete Rev.1: Reference Exhibit E.this section generally cannot be fully reviewed until a complete application is provided as a separate deviation section that includes the required format providing the LDC reference section and portion of code you intend to deviate from, what your deviation purposes instead of minimum code standards and your justification for the deviation request specific to this development. In an effort to provide review comments to the extent possible: For deviation 1, please consider providing an x-section showing all required improvements within the proposed reduced ROW (please also address transportation comments). Additionally this request combined with longer than normal dead-end streets needs to include justification or consideration for adequate health/safety concerns. For deviation 5 please include maximum number of markers proposed. The complex form/number of corners with short segments could easily cause a greater than expected number of markers well in excess of other developments. For deviation 9 please include justification with regarding to wetland preserves and consider a limitation on the extent of this request. Reducing the preserve setback for principle structures by half is not consistent with the intent and purpose of this LDC section. For deviation 10 and 11 please note that you cannot request deviations from the Administrative Code or the Code of Laws and Ordinances. Please remove both of these deviations. Rev. 2. Each deviation will be addressed as an individual comment moving forward. Response:Understood. Page 3 of 16 K:\2012\120030.00.04 Rockedge RPUD-Zoning&CRY\0007 RPUD Zoning Amendment Application Suppon\PUDA 2nd Insufliciency2015-10-09 Submittal#3\01-2015-10-09 PUDR Response Letter Submittal#3.docz .J-AL Correction Comment 7: Miscellaneous Corrections: For deviation 1, please consider providing an x-section showing all required improvements within the proposed reduced ROW (please also address transportation comments). Additionally this request combined with longer than normal dead-end streets needs to include justification or consideration for adequate health/safety concerns. Rev. 2. Deviation 1 Please explain how a 50-foot right-of-way accomplishes traffic calming to provide a safer transportation system. Staff understands a road design may provide a traffic calming function, but not a R.O.W. Pedestrian movement is considered safer when sidewalks are farther away from the road. Please cite references from State of Florida and/or National DOT Standards as a reference. Please provide a sketch/cross section showing road, R.O.W., sidewalks, required utilities (PUE), landscaping, and building setback for reference. Based the proposed standards of a 15' front yard setback from back of curb, the building would be located within the PUE. Response: The justification for Deviation #1 has been revised. The reduced right of way leads to a more compact roadway with sidewalks, landscaping and homes closer to the travel lanes. It is a commonly held planning and transportation concept that more compact roadways will lead to lower travel speeds, which creates a safer environment for drivers, cyclists and pedestrian. In the advent of an accident,lower speeds significantly reduce the risk of serious injury. For an excellent article on the subject please visit:http://vault.sierraclub.orq/sprawl/articles/narrow.asp A typical cross section is provided. As for the proposed 15'front yard setback from back of curb, that measurement would only apply if the developer chooses to build a multi family product. For non-multifamily product sold fee simple,the measurement would be from the R/W line. Multifamily developments do not require the use of dedicated right of way, and utilities and sidewalks to not have to be installed parallel to the roadway. As such, with MF product, the setback would be measured from back of curb or edge of pavement. The development standards have been revised to articulate this more clearly. Correction Comment 8: Miscellaneous Corrections Rev.2. Deviation 3. The deviation is asking for a sign on Davis Blvd. I think this is an error and meant for C.R 951 Collier Blvd. Please correct and give a timeline. (i.e.3 yrs,5 yrs., until last unit sold) Response:Correct, the deviation has been revised accordingly. Page 4 of 16 K:\2012\120030.00.04 Rockedge RPUD-Zoning&CRP\0007 RPUD Zoning Amendment Application Support PUDA 2nd Insufficiency\2015-10-09 Submittal#3\01-2015-10-09 PUDR Response Letter Submittal#3.docx Correction Comment 9: Miscellaneous Corrections: Deviation 5. For deviation 5 please include maximum number of markers proposed. The complex form/number of corners with short segments could easily cause a greater than expected number of markers well in excess of other developments. Rev. 2. Staff does not recommend. Staff met with the sign review staff regarding this deviation.A sign face of 64 square feet was considered large and 24 square feet was not considered unreasonable. Response: As discussed at our meeting on 9-26-15, we have revised our request to allow for the option of 1 monument structure sign along the project's C.R. 951 boundary with a sign face of 64 s.f., rather than the 2 boundary markers which would currently be allowed. The larger sign face is to improve the project's visibility and 64 s.f. is consistent with what is allowed for entrance signs per code. It should be noted that the LDC (see excerpt below) currently allows for boundary markers or monument structures, which is consistent with our deviation. The project's unique set of circumstances with its entrance tucked away down Sabal Road, and the high-volume and high-speed nature of C.R. 951, warrants this deviation which will improve the project's visibility and improve safety conditions. In addition, the larger sign will be consistent with the project unified design and branding approach. As requested, I have identified a few of many existing PUDs that allow larger boundary marker or monuments signs include: Tree Farm MPUD(Ord 07-54) Cypress Woods PUD(Ord.97-36) Mediterra PUD/DRI(Ord.01-61) Tuscany Preserve PUD(Ord. 03-28) Winding Cypress PUD(Ord. 02-35) • 14. Boundary Marker sign. One boundary marker sign or monument structure may be located at each property corner.The boundary marker may contain the name of the subdivision and the insignia or motto of the development. This provision shall apply to all new and existing residential developments within Collier County, including all created through the PUD process. In the event of a conflict between this provision and a PUD ordinance, the PUD language shall control. a. The maximum height is 8 feet to the uppermost portion of the boundary marker structure. b. The sign face area may not exceed 24 square feet in area and may not exceed the height or length of the monument or structure upon which it is located. Page 5 of 16 K:\2012\120030.00.04 Rockedge RPUD-Zoning&ERP\0007 RPUD Zoning Amendment Application Support\PUDA 2nd Insufficiency\2015-10-09 Submittal#3 101-2015-10-09 PUDR Response Letter Submittal#3.docx A jki iNGIN[FiI:.G C. Minimum setback from all property lines and road right-of-way is 10 feet. d. A maximum of two boundary markers shall be allowed on any one road frontage, provided that boundary markers are separated by a minimum distance of 250 feet. Correction Comment 10: Miscellaneous Corrections: Rev. 2. Deviation 10. Staff does not support. The road R.O.W. Melrose Lane is primarily used as a single access to an existing residential structure and along an existing plant nursery, all zoned agriculture. John's road is a private road with multiple single family homes.A 20'Type D is appropriate. Buffers are not intended for strictly road noise and lighting, but to establish vegetative areas for mature growth of trees with a 20+ spread. Limiting these buffer areas may cause root invasion later on as the plant material matures. 20' buffers are also transitional areas between large (+15 acres) and smaller developments that may impact the Right-of-Way. Response: As discussed at our meeting on 9-26-15, we have revised our deviation to request 15'Type D buffers rather than the 10'Type D buffer previously requested. The 15'buffer will be consistent with the buffer widths for the rest of the project. The Deviation Justification document has been revised accordingly. Landscape Review—Reviewed By: Daniel Smith Correction Comment 1: 4.06.02. Provide perimeter landscape buffers.See also LDC section 4.06.02 C,Table 2.4. Rev. 1: It appears that several of the required landscape buffers are located in ROW easements that may/may not be removed/vacated or vacatable. Confirm vacation or provide buffers within the development side of all easemetns & ROW's. Please also revise the east perimeter buffer that starts at the corner of Sabel Palm Road and Melrose Lane north along the Melrose Lane from Type A to required Type D. Rev. 2. Because this project is over 15 acres, Code requires a 20'Type D buffers along all R.O.W.'s. Please clearly show the buffers inside the R.O.W.'s on the master plan. Response: The Master Plan has been revised accordingly. Page 6 of 16 K:\2012\120030.00.04 Rockedge RPM)-Zoning&ERP\0007 RPUD Zoning Amendment Application Support\PUDA 2nd Insufficiency\2015-10-09 Submittal#3\01-2015-10-09 PUDR Response Letter Submittal#3.docx Correction Comment 3: Miscellaneous Corrections: Please provide a typical lot layout base on the proposed setbacks showing P.U.E., road, required landscape, and sidewalks.A canopy tree+20' is required for each lot. Response: As discussed during our meeting on 9-26-15, we understand staff's concern about effectively meeting the landscaping requirement for 1 tree per lot and have included the following note in the PUD: In order to support a canopy tree with a minimum 20 foot crown spread as required in LDC Section 4.06.05, individual lots must accommodate enough space for the entire 20 foot canopy to be located wholly within the lot boundaries, except where the lot is adjacent to a lake maintenance easement, landscape buffer easement, and/or preserve, in which case, a portion of the required 20 foot canopy may protrude into such area. County Attorney Review—Reviewed By: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Correction Comment 1: Miscellaneous Corrections: Rev. 2. See Attached. The issue with the Archaeological is that the language is very unclear. I have raised the same issues on both of my reviews. Per our meeting with Fred Reischl, the applicant needs to identify the sites on the master plan or separate Archeological plan and the Archeological commitments need to cross reference the sites on the plan. Response: As discussed with CAO on 9-26-15, we have attached a map identify all archaeological sites referenced in the Archaeological Conditions section of the PUD. Environmental Review—Reviewed By:Stephen Lenberger Correction Comment 3: The Native Vegetation Map provided provide with the environmental data needs to be revised to show FLUCFCS Codes 617E4(1.81 acres) and 624E4(2.45 acres) as native vegetation.This is pursuant to staff's site visit with the environmental consultant. Response: See the attached revised exhibits, per e-mail conversations between county staff and Turrell, Hall&Associates, Inc. staff. Based on these e-mail conversations, 617E4 has been revised to encompass 1.45 acres (which removes 0.36 acres as non-native) and 624E4 has been revised to encompass 1.71 acres (which removes 0.74 acres as non-native). This change comes from further defining the areas of native/non-native vegetation in these areas based on aerial photography, and the site visit. Page 7 of 16 K:\2012\120030.00.04 Rockedge RPUD-Zoning&CRY\0007 RPUD Zoning Amendment Application SupportPUDA 2nd Insufficiency\2015-10-09 Submittal#3`01-2015-10-09 PURR Response Letter Submittal#3 door The native vegetation calculations need to include an additional 6.43 acres as native vegetation. This consists of the following. Amend section 3.1 of the environmental data, Exhibit F of the PUD document and the PUD master plan notes and land use summary accordingly. 1.81 acres for FLUCFCS Code 617E4 2.45 acres for FLUCFCS Code 624E4 3.42 acres for FLUCFCS Code 740 & 742, due to the past County compliance enforcement case identified in the EIS for the original PUD rezone. Response:Section 3.1 of the environmental data has been amended based on the above referenced e- mail conversations between County and THA staff. Include in section 3.1 of the environmental data, a summary by FLUCFCS Code of how the minimum preservation requirement for the site was calculated. If not already done for project, existing easements pursuant to LDC section 3.05.07.B.2.d should be excluded from calculations for preserve requirement. Also existing easements pursuant to LDC section 3.05.07 B.2.d must be excluded from the boundary of the preserve.Amend the Native Vegetation Map in the environmental data accordingly. Response:Section 3.1 has been amended to include a table and brief description of how the minimum preserve calculation was determined. There are no easements included in the calculations. The Native Vegetation Map has also been amended. Native Vegetation preservation needs to be addressed as a separate section in accordance with LDC section 3.08.00 A.4.c. Environmental data is supposed to be formatted in accordance with LDC section 3.08.00 A.4 at time of public hearing. Please amend accordingly. Response:Please see the attached amended drawing set. Correction Comment 5: Enlarge font size of the Legend, Land Use Summary, PUD Master Plan Notes and other writing on the PUD master plan. They are barely legible on the 8 %2 x 11 inch master plan and will not be legible when photocopied or recorded on this size paper. The Land Use Summary and PUD Master Plan Notes may have to be included on a separate sheet in order for them to be legible on 8%2 x 11 inch paper. Amend the end of section IV.A.3 of the PUD document to read as follows: ....Subject to approval by the permitting agencies and in accordance with the LDC. Amend section IV.A.3 of the PUD document to read as follows: 3. Drainage and water management structures. Response: Understood,PUD document has been revised accordingly. FYI,the RFMUD LDC provision referenced as justification for Deviation#9, is for a reduction in widths for buffers adjacent to wetlands and not for setbacks to wetlands as stated in the justification. This should be corrected or sentence removed from the justification. Since some of the preserve contains uplands, you may want to remove the word "wetlands"from the deviation itself. Staff will support the requested deviation. Response: Understood,deviation has been revised accordingly. Page 8of16 K:\2012\120030.00 A4 Rockedge RPUD-Zoning&13RP\0007 RPUD Zoning Amendment Application Support\'UDA 2nd lnsufficiency2015-10-09 Submittal#3\01-2015-10-09 PUDR Response Letter Submittal 143.docx 1?wti Correction Comment 6: Provide the following Environmental Data (LDC 3.08.00): Remove all of Sections 4 & 5 (Preserve Management Program & Preservation Monitoring Program) and the Preserve Management Plan, from environmental data. They are not required and will not be reviewed and commented upon until time of PPL or SDP submittal. Remove the monitoring map from the exhibits provided for the environmental data. Response:Sections 4&5 have been removed from the environmental supplement. Include in the environmental data, the qualification of the preparer of the environmental data in accordance with LDC section 3.08.00 A.2. Generally a copy of the preparer's resume is included in the environmental data. Response:See Section 5 of the environmental data. Section 3.2.1 of the environmental data references an "attached UMAM package", but the package is not included with the submittal. Please either delete reference to the "attached UMAM package" or include a copy of the package with the environmental data. Response:Reference to the UMAM package has been removed from this Section of the Environmental Data. Provide a copy of all Environmental Assessments or Audits in accordance with LDC section 3.08.00 A.4.d.i, if any were done for the property or portions of the property. Response:No Environmental Assessments or Audits were required for this property. Provide soil testing of the former agricultural fields in accordance with LDC section 3.08.00 A.4.d.ii. Response:This property was not used as a former agricultural field or any other use that would result in storage of hazardous materials, therefore no soil testing is required. Should this remain a concern for staff, the applicant would be happy to comply with this request at time of SDP or PPL. Transportation Planning Review—Reviewed By: Michele Mosca Correction Comment 2: Miscellaneous Corrections 1) RPUD Master Plan, Sheet 1: Amity Rd. —Clearly identify buffer location and portion of ROW to be vacated. 2) RPUD Master Plan,Sheet 2:Johns Rd.—Remove buffer from ROW. 3) RPUD Master Plan, Sheets 2 and 3: Provide all access easements and/or agreement documents; remove the term, "to be vacated" from all easement descriptions, as these are private agreements and are not subject to the public vacation process; and, relocate the buffers to be outside of easements depicted on the master plan or condition those buffers to only allow them at their depicted locations after the easements are removed (revise Master Plan and place condition with Exhibit F). Page 9 of 16 K:\2012\120030.00.04 Rockedge RPUD-Zoning&ERP\0007 RPUD Zoning Amendment Application Support\PUDA 2nd Insufficiency\2015-10-09 Submittal 113 01-2015-10-09 PURR Response Letter Submittal#3.docx 4) Exhibit F, Developer Commitments,Transportation Section: Limit the project's trip generation to a maximum of 253 two-way unadjusted PM Peak Hour trips. Response:1)Amity Road-Master Plan revised to clearly show the location of the buffer on the inside of the 20'and 5'easements. As for the 30'R/W easement to be vacated,it has been removed from the Master Plan per the CAO since it is a private easement. 2)John's Road - the Master Plan has been revised to clearly show the buffer inside of the ROW. 3) All private easements have been removed from the Master Plan.4)The Transportation conditions have been revised accordingly. Consistency Review Memorandum Dated 8/13/2015—Reviewed By:Corby Schmidt Request: To amend the existing Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD), including: adding acreage at two locations totaling+/- 31.91 acres, thereby increasing the overall acreage to +/- 106.44 acres in the Rockedge PUD; eliminating an affordable housing component along with an accompanying housing agreement that would have provided additional density; utilizing Transferable Development Right (TDR) credits to allow development of 266 swelling units, at a density of 2.5 units per acre for the PUD; providing for a new project layout that involves relocating its primary entrance from CR 951 to Sabal Palm Road; adding types of residences along with appropriate development standards; increasing the area of Preserve; adding deviations from the Land Development Code;and, revising developer commitments. Location:The Rockedge PUD is located on the east side of Collier Boulevard, north of Sabal Palm Road and south of John's Road,within Section 23,Township 50 South, Range 26 East. Comprehensive Planning Comments: The subject property is designated Urban Mixed Use District, Urban Residential Fringe (URF) Subdistrict, as depicted on the Future Land Use Map (FLUM) and addressed in the Future Land Use Element (FLUE) of the Collier County Growth Management Plan (GMP).The applicable provisions of the URF Subdistrict found in the FLUE are listed below,followed by staff analysis in [bold text]. The purpose of the URF Subdistrict is to provide transitional densities between the Urban Designated Area and the Agricultural/Rural Area. Relative to this petition,the URF Subdistrict allows a residential density of 1.5 dwelling units per acre (DU/A) — along with associated recreational uses and essential services — and up to 6.0 additional DU/A by providing affordable housing. This bonus density is specifically addressed in the URF Subdistrict subsection b. and describes a portion of the Rockedge subject site —and is no longer being pursued. The existing RPUD is approved for a portion of the Rockedge subject site—and is no longer being pursued. The existing RPUD is approved for a maximum density of 5.9 DU/A (utilizing the Affordable-Workforce Housing Bonus — up to 400 residential units 0 on the original+/-76.46 acres).This acreage increases to+/-106.44 with this PUD amendment. The URF Subdistrict allows a residential density of 1.5 DU/A, and up to 2.5 DU/A via use of Transfer of Development Right (TDR) credits [and the same recreational uses and essential services].TDR credits will be used to achieve the additional density/dwelling units.TDR credits must be obtained from Rural Fringe Mixed Use District Sending Lands located within one mile of the URF Subdistrict. This PUD processes the maximum eligible density/dwelling units utilizing Page 10 of 16 K:\2012\120030.00.04 Rockedge RPUD-Zoning&ERP\0007 RPUD Zoning Amendment Application Suppon\PUDA 2nd Insufficiency Q015-10-09 Submittal#3`01-2015-10-09 PUDR Response Letter Submittal 113.docz ..1-� F.N..Irc FFRINf. TDR credits. Based upon the increased, overall site acreage, the site is eligible for 160 dwelling units without use of TDR Credits (106.44 ac. X 1.5 DU/A= 159.66 - 160 DUs) and 266 DUs with use of TDR credits(106.44 ac.X 1 DU/A= 106.44 4 160 DUs+106 DUs=266 DUs). Regarding the TDR tracking and redemption process for development orders submitted subsequent to rezoning(SDPs and plats), LDC Section 2.03.07D.4.f.ii.c)i) requires documentation to be submitted as part of SDPs and plats to demonstrate the applicant is in possession of the required number of TDR Credits for the project. However, it does not explicitly require the submittal of a density calculation and TDR Credits with respect to each individual plat, plan or project, or the redemption of TDR Credits (the GMP also does not contain these specific requirements)—so staff routinely requests such a commitment be added to the PUD. Exhibit F, Developer Commitments,already proposes such a commitment. The URF Subdistrict encourages a rezone to be in the form of a planned unit development. [Rockedge began as a PUD and is proposed here as a PUD amendment and rezone by expansion. Comprehensive Planning staff points out that the LDC requires that TDR credits be utilized in accordance with the requirements of Section 2.03.07.D.4.g. The PUDA will utilize TDRs proportionately(which would be 60%Base UDs and 40%TDR DUs). Of the 266 DUs proposed, 160 are derived from Base density and 106 DUs are derived from TDRs.] Main URF Subdistrict provisions provide that"Proposed development in the Subdistrict shall be fully responsible for all necessary water management improvements, including the routing of all on-site and appropriate off-site water through the project's water management system, and a fair share cost of necessary improvements to the water through the project's water management system made necessary by new development in the Subdistrict." [Comprehensive Planning defers to the Engineering Services staff as part of their review of the petition.] FLUE Policy 5.4 requires new developments to be compatible with, and complementary to, the surrounding land area. [Comprehensive Planning leaves this determination to the Zoning Services staff as part of their review of the petition in its entirely. However,staff notes that in reviewing the appropriateness of the requested uses/densities on the subject site, the compatibility analysis is to be comprehensive and include a review of both the subject property and surrounding or nearby properties with regard to allowed use intensities and densities, development standards (building heights, setbacks, landscape buffers, etc.), building mass, building location and orientation, architectural features, amount and type of open space and location,traffic generation/attraction,etc.] In order to promote smart growth policies, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following FLUE policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Each policy is followed by staff analysis in [bold text]. Page 11 of 16 K:\2012\120030.00.04 Rockedge RPUD-Zoning&8RP\0007 RPUD Zoning Amendment Application Suppon\PUDA 2nd Insufficiency\2015-10-09 Submittal#3\01-2015-10-09 PURR Response Letter Submittal#3.docx J?W& Objective 7: In an effort to support the Dover, Kohl & Partners publication, Toward Better Places: The Community Character Plan for Collier County, Florida, promote smart growth policies, reduce greenhouse gas emissions, and adhere to the existing development character of Collier County, the following policies shall be implemented for new development and redevelopment projects, where applicable. Policy 7.1: The County shall encourage developers and property owners to connect their properties to fronting collector and arterial roads, except where no such connection can be made without violating intersection spacing requirements of the Land Development Code. [This site fronts the canal located on the east side of Collier Boulevard. Exhibit C, RPUD Master Plan, depicts a single, indirect access to Collier Boulevard (CR 951) — classified as an arterial road in the Transportation Element—via Sabal Palm Road. This site also fronts John's Road. No access is proposed directly or indirectly to John's Road.] Policy 7.2: The County shall encourage internal access or loop roads in an effort to help reduce vehicle congestion on nearby collector and arterial roads and minimize the need for traffic signals. [Exhibit C, RPUD Master Plan, depicts an internal road configuration providing internalized accesses along a network of dead-end streets, cul-de-sacs and loop roadways. All vehicular traffic accesses Collier Boulevard (CR 951) indirectly via Sabal Palm Road from a single street access.] Exhibit E, List of Requested Deviations, requests relief from the prohibition on the cul-de-sac length in excess of 1,000 feet. As no other means of access is depicted on Exhibit C, all parcels with the PUD will have their only internal access to this one street. [Vehicular connection with/access to John's Road or Amity Road is potentially possible and would effectively reduce the cul-de-sac length proposed, and minimize the extent of requested Deviation no. 7 (or render it entirely unnecessary). No other deviation requested poses consistency concerns.] Policy 7.3 All new and existing developments shall be encouraged to connect their local streets and their interconnection points with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments regardless of land use type.The interconnection of local streets between developments is also addressed in Policy 9.3 of the Transportation Element. [Transportation Policy 9.3 provides that "The County shall require, wherever feasible, the interconnection of local streets between developments to facilitate convenient movement throughout the road network. The LDC shall identify the circumstances and conditions that would require the interconnection of neighboring developments." LDC Section 6.06.01.6 provide that `The street layout of all subdivisions or developments shall be coordinated with the street systems of the surrounding areas, [and] adjacent properties shall be provided with local street interconnections unless topography, other natural features, or other ordinances/ regulations do not allow or require said connections". Page 12 of 16 K:\2012\120030.00.04 Rockedge RPUD-Zoning&CRP\0007 RPUD Zoning Amendment Application Support\PUDA 2nd Insufficiency\2015-10-09 Submittal#3\01-2015-10-09 PUDR Response Letter Submittal#3.docx Local street connections with adjoining neighborhoods or other developments are not disallowed by other ordinances or regulations,and appear to be feasible at no fewer than two (2)locations around the perimeter of the irregularly horseshoe-shaped subject site as follows: • John's Road lies along a majority of the northernmost boundary of the subject PUD. The RPUD Master Plan illustrates a local street abutting/stubbed to John's Road the potential for future connection / access is evident — but does not indicate interconnection with arrow symbols or by notation.This private road potentially could become a public road or publicly accessible roadway in the future,where the potential for connection/access is present—and should be reserved. • Amity Road lies along a segment of the northerly boundary of the subject PUD. This private road potentially could become a public road or publicly accessible roadway in the future, where the potential for future connection/access is evident — and should be reserved. Providing vehicular connection with / access to Amity Road would resolve the shortcomings presented by the extreme cul-de-sac length proposed, and minimize the extent of proposed Deviation no.7[or render it entirely unnecessary]. • Developed and undeveloped residential properties lie to the east of the subject PUD, along with indoor and outdoor plant nursery facilities. The land uses lying along easterly boundary do not lend themselves to interconnection points, and makes vehicular interconnection infeasible. • Sabal Palm Road lies along a segment of the southerly boundary of the subject PUD. Land further to the south is the VeronaWalk residential PUD. The subject PUD provides its single access point with Sabal Palm Road. • A recreational pathway, water management canal and Collier Boulevard lie to the west of a portion of the subject PUD—where interconnection is possible and feasible. Connection with/access to Collier Boulevard however, is not being encouraged by the County and is infeasible here. • The terminal end of Amity Road lies along a segment of the westerly boundary of the subject PUD. Interconnection is potentially possible and feasible with Amity Road should it become a public road in the future. As explained above, providing vehicular connection with/access to Amity Road would effective reduce the excessive cul-de-sac length proposed, and minimize the extent of proposed Deviation no. 7 [or render it entirely unnecessary. The absence of interconnection between these abutting roadways and properties exacerbates problems associated with underdeveloped interconnectivity [unnecessary more-frequent and longer trips, higher greenhouse gas emissions, vehicle congestion, etc.], and perpetuates a development style not encouraged by the County.This needs to be revised in the PUD with an addition of arrow symbols to the Exhibit C,RPUD Master Plan along the project boundary with abutting roadways and between the Exhibit C, RPUD master Plan along the project boundary with abutting roadways and between the Exhibit C, RPUD Master Plan along the project boundary with abutting roadways and between adjoining sites where interconnection appears Page 13 of 16 K:\2012\120030.00.04 Rockedge RPUD-Zoning&CRP\0007 RPUD Zoning Amendment Application Support\PUDA 2nd Insufficiency2015-10-09 Submittal#3`01-2015-10-09 PURR Response Letter Submittal 113.docx _1UL feasible with labeling to indicate potential future vehicular interconnection/interconnection points as well as within Exhibit F,Developer Commitments.] Policy 7.4: The County shall encourage new developments to provide walkable communities with a blend of densities common open spaces, civic facilities and a range of housing prices and types. [As to walkable communities,the PUD provides for sidewalks located on both sides of all streets. Similar to the design shortcomings with vehicular interconnection discussed above, Exhibit C, RPUD Master Plan, or other PUD materials do not provide for non-vehicular interconnection with abutting properties — even though the opportunities to interconnection are present. Non-vehicular interconnection is possible and appears feasible at various locations to the north,west and south.As with the absence of vehicular interconnection discussed above,the lack of pedestrian and bicycle interconnection with abutting properties exacerbates problems associated with underdeveloped interconnectivity, and perpetuates a development style not encouraged by the County. This design shortcoming is magnified by the project's deviation requested to allow cul-de-sac lengths to reach an extreme 2,500 feet. Walkability is generally satisfied when these distances do not exceed one-quarter of a mile (1,320 feet). A bicycle / pedestrian connection point with John's Road can be added to the PUD [in both Master Plan and Commitments], in the event it becomes a public road, to achieve a more acceptable cul- de-sac length and the walkability desired by the FLUE. This private road potentially could become a public road or publically accessible roadway in the future, where the potential for a bicycle /pedestrian connection point is present — and should be reserved. A recreational pathway, water management canal and Collier Boulevard lie to the west of a portion of the subject PUD—where bicycle/pedestrian connections are possible and feasible. Master Plan note no. 5 gives a soft commitment that a bicycle / pedestrian connection that may be provided to the recreation path. This commitment language should be strengthened to demonstrate clear intent, and revised to clearly allow for more than a single connection point. With regard to common open spaces, preserve areas and civic facilities,the PUD provides the sixty percent open space the LDC requires; permits community centers and clubhouses, various recreational uses and facilities, including tennis and basketball courts and biking and hiking paths, and passive open space uses and structures in residential acres. Designated preserve areas permit passive recreational uses and structures. With regard to a blend of densities and a range of housing prices and types, the application identifies a variety of residential units(with minimum floor areas ranging from 1,600 sq.ft. to 4,000 sq.ft.).] Regarding the TDR tracking and redemption process or development orders submitted subsequent to rezoning(SDPs and plats), LDC Section 4.03.07D.4.f.ii.c)i) requires documentation to be submitted as part of SDPs and plats to demonstrate the applicant is in possession of the required number of TDR Credits for the project. However, it does not explicitly require the submittal of a density calculation and TDR Credits with respect to each SDP and plat—so as to Page 14 of 16 K.\2012\120030.00.04 Rockedge RPUD-Zoning&CRP\0007 RPUD Zoning Amendment Application Support\PUDA 2nd Insufficiency\2015-10-09 Submittal#3\01-2015-10-09 PURR Response Letter Submittal#3 dock track the chronological assignment of base density and TDR Credits with respect to each individual plat, plan or project,or the redemption of TDR Credits(the GMP also does not contain these specific requirements). Both of these items should be added to the PUD as developer commitments, as has been requested and provided by other PUDs utilizing TDR density. It is acknowledged that the Maximum Density section of Exhibit A references obtaining the needed TDR Credits per the GMP and LDC requirements but the GMP and LDC requirements do not explicitly address the aforementioned two items. Based upon the above analysis,the proposed Planned Unit Development Amendment may be deemed consistent with the FLUE. In an effort to support the County Policies discussed above however,staff recommends the following changes: Staff Recommendations: 1. Exhibit C, RPUD Master Plan: Add arrow symbols to the boundary with abutting roadways and between adjoining sites with labeling to indicate and reserve potential future vehicular and non-vehicular interconnection/interconnection points. In particular, these interconnection / access points should be reserved / added along the side and/or at the end of Amity Road and onto John's Road. An additional Master Plan Note may be necessary to clearly indicate that non-vehicular interconnection will be pursued and provided at locations where vehicular interconnection is pursued and will not be provided. Correct the present labeling near the arrow symbol now appearing at the end of the hammerhead cul-de-sac in the tract adjacent to Collier Boulevard to read, "POTENTIAL FUTURE"INTERCONNECTION". 2. Exhibit C, RPUD Master Plan: Add arrow symbols to the boundary with abutting roadways and between adjoining sites with labeling to indicate and reserve potential future non-vehicular interconnection/interconnection points. In particular, these interconnection/access points should be reserved/added at one or more points along Amity Road, at one or more points along John's Road, and at one or more points along Collier Boulevard. An additional Master Plan Note may be necessary to clearly indicate that non-vehicular interconnection will be pursued and provided at locations where vehicular interconnection is pursued and will not be provided. Revise master Plan note no. 5 to strengthen its language to demonstrate clear intent, and clearly allow for more than a single bicycle/pedestrian connection. 3. Exhibit F, Development Commitments: Add language to, at the time of the first Site Development Plan involving interconnectivity, at locations where potential future vehicular and/or non-vehicular interconnection/interconnection points are indicated on the RPUD Master Plan, for providing, to the maximum extent feasible, vehicular and/or non-vehicular interconnectivity with abutting roadways and between adjoining sites. This commitment will indicate that the developer shall provide to staff all correspondence between the parties so as to document efforts to interconnect. Page 15 of 16 K:\2012\120030.00.04 Rockedge RPUD-Zoning&LRP\0007 RPUD Zoning Amendment Application Suppon'\PUDA 2nd Insufficiency\2015-10-09 Submittal#3\01-2015-10-09 PUDR Response Letter Submittal 43.docz F.N..iN4FNINf. 4. Add language to, at the time of the first Site Development Plan involving abutting properties where a public road or publicly accessible roadway is developed in the future, at locations where potential future vehicular and/or non-vehicular interconnection / interconnection points are indicated on the RPUD Master Plan, for providing, to the maximum extent feasible, vehicular and/or non-vehicular interconnectivity with abutting roadways and between adjoining sites. This commitment will indicate that the developer shall provide to staff all correspondence between the parties so as to document efforts to interconnect. Response: Pursuant to a meeting held with staff prior to the fist resubmittal, and a recent conversation with Michele Mosca, it is our understanding that Mr. Schmitt was not aware of previous discussions with staff related to access and interconnections, and as such will be revising his comments. As further discussed with Michele Mosca, we have added a potential bicycle/pedestrian interconnection along the eastern project boundary,south of the preserve, and PUD Master Plan note #5 accordingly. We are confident that we have satisfactorily addressed each of your comments, and given the delays associated with having four different zoning reviewers assigned to this project,we respectfully ask to be found sufficient and scheduled for public hearing as soon as possible. We thank you for your assistance with this matter and appreciate your willingness to meet with us in the last few weeks to fully address all comments and concerns. As always, should you have any questions or require minor modifications prior to hearing, please contact our office at(239)597-0575. Sincerely, RWA,Inc. Patrick Vanasse,AICP Director of Planning cc: Sean Martin File 120030.00.04 Page 16 of 16 K:\2012\120030.00.04 Rockedge RPUD-Zoning&ERP\0007 RPUD Zoning Amendment Application Support\PUDA 2nd Insumciency2015-10-09 Submittal#3\0l-2015-10-09 PUDR Response Letter Submittal#3.docx . , r:.. - m . ( w K" _ (S),� r- N • N• B 0 ,, Z �/ i Q '"�r N Z O CO o c C N L. � - W N W W~ . r c4 Q } F- U; o m Z i m wr Wr 0.Q z. , 6 � . . o g3 °'m co ¢ M , -S -, 1 'I a 0 •' M C�1 _ • i � , ' x III LJ�.. s G { �n W ' in— Kam• ,X.� Z t {�• , �� w a Z , a cr V V lj1 - • +, _ _ _. _ L u ... �1 ' -.' d•Chi - - ''''.:'4 _ �' } ',i r o M a ct, . V ��-I t . i� - ' c�U w d �y stir"' V1 V.. f X C , } . y0 nn r„...,• {a.t_ • : L y f w., „ 4 , IT o0 Ot ' t R� qY • t ':-..-%,f..,,,,,; A19 3loa _ h p.\1322-rockedpe\CAD\SHEETPERMIT-COUNTY\1322-ROCKEDGE-CNTY.dwo BONNETED BAT SURVEY 11/2/2015 fit . V C' � E in Vf H Vt & w .. ---,�.. fL Q yy LL s t g yyy ynj W .+. .t: .. z VI W Q F -• y p J 3 , re z 1c�l:C7x � n� a , .i + ,r - A. :Tj Q J flL Ca uy 0 pp _ 1 ;r1 Q j Q Vf Q Z , s 1 N u> F f LL Wa .. ttv • Z N 5 °z F 3 m 3o 1 ;J m L : : o 45 1 s i oQQN Po, °pW la M - 4 -AL` d 0 j Q *F A>E r H o N /), ,- ). 12(i' g g - I i 2 , U v 1 .. ..ate __._._. ....�«.. l - _ - C-4, i 0 0 / - ,, • • • ter, 04 1 d ''" r u 1 ^r e •D -9 ppo i 7 1 �3 x �, O m a N s y. 9 aye T ;�7 $ ` � 0.1 0 a -1„_L.,,_-, t ., f a � ¢ k "} 6 N ti, E :i A ? 'r `, ..�, Via. 8 $ " Jr p:\1322-rockedge\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-COUNTY\1322-ROCKEDGECNTY.dwg SOILS MAP 11/2/2015 o N N �°i' d r N N' tN w L7 ❑ Z Et ;44% V U ''' i s a ,:. E . ; 0 O. h 0 Q > W W r a z Q 'U W co > ur 3 gu &- N 6 e V W d t yO 0 .. a W V p aW a n o 5 g P § o ,. cl "�oZ w a > ° § d o m m d W ' HWW�', 0 fwzi H Qa h `w -- w N = W �\ 0 = o vv °m o cd I- — Z • L r' d' N !r II a 410° 0 : : U Q •:r . . � ca „ . 0 U , N U M N co CV W ,, op, W } 'Y r-, N I. U -. w G c is. - O N �a, • N • o cm S -> ^- f W y ¢ N M t II =� > a 0 N L Z dW' N w n O E( M ( p EI 1 ! I { N TJ 0:\1322-rockedge\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-COUNTY\1322-ROCKEDGE-CNTY.dwq ARCHAEOLOGICAL MAP 11/2/2015 4, W - Lo > w Ill w a . Z c o !. = c3 ai .ti o of f[i 6 a ci of ,� �• ui 1� ad N d r n, Y , tki tit 1,7e-(..7 U�1 V1 1-LL '� "7 [cyi in w yr �4 2 2 'Q i ';,11 ,"1 W U u Q O O z ¢ a a a u m N N g g 3 3 m m i7 w, m m m > n u w 8 'a d N 5 6 '4 a n t � s c'' cc n o c Z g.. W Li W z W a ° = g j a x 2 > w w 5 a . 6- z z zs 5 w F, t ' e z I < .- 0 Aa w V 43 H � Q c',- s ,�,E H- � z w w w w r�, m Q: � � h �� �+ < u, �- c tp 3 3 0 0 '41 '' 3 A a a a `� 2 ° o a N W m m c c a S O ° +� _ x 3 a Q x xi Jra ti .,, $ �i C�i rc o : N W �W/ V w Y n W mWW a� WMW �'ir W w yyam}} w W ry w N .f W w eH m oo f «t Hh1 i' W W; (II . N (g) V.' O III • W c a t jj Y "I w Q V' Iy '17-..'.=. ^ E cD' ._W 1 1 E d y • 0 El. : 0. w/, w w v cv N N � E€, 0 . d'= N ! O 11 ' 1 ..... W � 1omN! t 001 W 1i c— s— 2 f0. +cry :}f F O ci .r —�7^ rn o �n a N cd U d� a ,� ! I' - E z w o 4 �• T..> 1 M asi 1(2. �' CA .—c—'1,..,_, >= a U W * W rn 1 0 N d w' U z f C Ch 7 W §a �•_ c su i p:11322-rockedae\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-COUNTY\1322-ROCKEDGE-CNTY.dwa PRESERVES MAP 11/2/2015 ____. 1 h r 'N W 4 pp {p ((rpp ((pp ' ID LLl c.,) © N Oh! M ,,, A L0 4.. g C-I 4 M M S 4, SD - M OY @. h1 0? N © R h v d.4 id is co O r 4 m "Z Si c*i r Iro r ci p5 <- ul ' d ri . '.'7 i W a .n U l ° Z �/ t,- F O d G g . °p u `n W a 'o ° Q ° ¢ x v * a a a W " m m m a m u� < < o L Q N a ° w w. w '1' O T 4 L 6 a W w tu U V 6 O O G x d d a.' \ a: W 3 c0c� uri w d 4 �.1 2 Z Z `J c~,_n 8 6 °o o co N i n a z z z � wX o p o c ¢ � C., ru � 3 3 '' °� °� °� � tw � ca o o; >3 z a ci a s 1-- m o O O *1 w m E- a z rc 3 2 0 Q G 4 0 - W w 0 u- re w u x x .‹. 7r am, a m pi. cn a M F N y cV N N `.. / V w V W. w SO Qtl �G' U W X W n Lti W do w w w w. w w W W O N :: : °w F- z z i - U y g w w W 0 0 � o w N a 1.1J 0 ._ : , , , .::::, , m ott. W Q OZ-� I— <Z O2 W N W = l \ Q ©z<RI I., w¢ > W �t W \ .\/ wbeNw *: W > zF !A ' ce �-\ 4 • W hw°�a> z W` r cry, 1 ¢w aw v o Qv4w cfl N 'lli Li r rr 2O iri V co V an,, cv ;,1-' thE --a--:.i,-.)'--c.'--c-).g .._E.,.."---:z '-'2-':.,_,- "71t ork co �� s O co S 35 *r Q - x "-=--1 ct W v (.0 T.. f"u w w _ > a o _r r4 a C13 '6 Z CO ti ��k 2 -.a yo i ' Z I , la� 3 an18 J211100 w p:\1322-rockedae\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-COUNTV\1322-ROCKEDGE-CNTV.dwp NATIVE VEGETATION MAP 11/2/2015 0 (.rm.i,,.c-'".-1,-- ,■o„, 8 ci cs.3.i 6 8 8 oC°ty eS. P 4 48 g: o o —8 i 1 8 0` . ; .",.. 4w) N 6 z m ,,, `', `:-: `*`,' c; ri ei •t- til *S .- ''' ''' .2 *”. •,l't t - ' tc ,....• tj tj ce Cd 0_ 0. O. CO Ar CS a - Of ,-,. E 8 8 8 c, c, ,,,, . . 0 O. elltXV. 2 ,0z ••3 t.ry co ca 03 )•• 2 a < < ...' 4 a ›- >" cto ° ,4 CC g A g c, eg . r 0 t,, t4 0 ha r,t,, , ,,•.- (i , . . • f D ic, ta _.; :".1' clagni-," 6cc , , • -*' zz .Do 0,, ,,, 5 2 E .?j, ci z .1 . Lk.- - - ..= - 1- ,, 88 7.. uate -- "*" cecece ca ,t- e •i - 5 6 .: '. z z .L2 ,.- C) " N CO 't ''' (/) ' ''' m ." ''' .1 al LU UJ 111 N t)''0 7:4 3 '4 %I ;.■ ,.., •:r . . . . - . . . •e)ea e)w Le tli al B ‘1)0 0 :''''**:"Ckt...'.°:'.'••'. .*•'•''*'CNI':'..'.'.° ••'•*••.••*. (P:: 2 P P - 0 6°' f.o. 0_ F ?.6 (.a-' (*.II ce4 e z±,ii, 41........ ci . 0 4','?,)'A'. -4. .: « N „.. 0(9 2 6,--,, ,c4. R g ,,0a I— - ...g LE, re< ,..; -,4.: ci K III z z Z -.- 0 R R R tr) a.. • '`.•`:::::....i..:...:*. ::'. ' ',...,•,.-*.iiiI-‘,,,i,....i,.....,i,,,..7,..'...4,,,..i*......:... ',."......, ...itt ° 'v i'$":+Z4t'.:'':"':•:.)744..:.:o:.4i.r(,1, 0:w er6n) :<4 " i'44 . ' , ;%,':.:-:•,,,rf'.tt*.•:,I,1:::::,..1...,:,.:4,:f.:4,,,, 4 ::::z.tit;.....:., q. ..,,,, . .?iiz.f,:-:••;:::::;,::.::..:st.,.,,,:.:+:.:: 4 5 P- '1 z r . 4***:4"t4 i•-• ti.:4:.:.:;:;.4A '..::4•:',,:•::(;":".".:.:C.:+:4,:;:!.:4:4::::4;.;4$- ,.' - 0 ti)to cl) L'i'l g * 8 4.1!:::,,,tt',; , ••••44....,4.4.4,,,,,A,::4',,, 4:4,4%,...4:.•••,,tol,;,1,,,,,:s.:4:3..114,,,...,,,i,, , ,.,-, _lu I!! _ 5 6 z < L .....,.,,,...........7,‘ .,‘, ,,, 2(.2 c..) 'c'" *0',.,41,4.4'. • ----'-'- 1 - - 011.*IA4O44....•'O'L'"O4**A,i (..:2 2 2 „...,4 1.. ei < , ......,...1,,. ' ' '"4'4'44.***"./4'!#•#`"****,...Z,.tprP',,, K '`-,' W LU v. ,t,..9- , ,„ -,,, ,,,‘,,t,,,,...,;;;:::;::....;,,..;,2t.,;i:,;;;;,.,:;., ‘, , .,,Ti.,(',.., $7,.:,.2., g. . 6:t V 't.L6 •zr cj ,,,4,:••,,,,,,,,,:?4,4,,,,,,,,,i.,.,!t..11,444... - ' .,' *.,_''i' , +1::::::::::::::,;$,,,,..;;::*tk .,,,,,.../,-,,... 1.,: _ 41 '1, 0 , ED (.1 CD .• .,..,...,...,..........,70.i.i....;.,,, , ,_ • „,,,........„.....,4,,....40. „. .:E ......, .. i , ... ‘: 4 ...**■,:4..N.!•;: :,,. p.... •••+^t,..tA,...- .. Lir ' t•.,....e. ,,4, , co r.::,:rfi.l....Z.4.t.,1:4-..:47,41.e._,,,,,it:c.,s, , .4 z ,,, V , r''; :d ::: ;.*::::..4.«..,1 ,.. '4( ,c,\ir ':.ii ,...,,41j‘':,,,,•::::•iiti;■:4",.!;.■ 1il.:41:i::::. re,._ ,-,, o ,, w, .;,„1",„,.it,‘ ...i_ia\- ,,, „, „,.,, i . .. , . .... co ,.._._ 4. ' 2,1 , i 1 ,,g11 „7.,,, 44":4.tii:l'e:: ,::::::* g 0 is. 1 , izi ......._,._-- :,.:::..:,...:.,..........,..,-,......:::, w m •1 , •zr 0,,,,1.t.:.:4,44:0:4;4,:1.'i,:tf,',.;Z:„.4:•1 0 c°7 a =-= , — l'..P4,4''''.4.-:****:"*.)t!!*+.4+4:.e.'". t”- 4.;111,4!.?".t.'',!*****;',),:■21""is...0.41.°4* ' ' ' . d 11. ,•+ 4.4,i,44t.IR- II ii (.7 co p ..L..2 < I- al '---' t,•,+e,''''..** ' '71- —■ ,/, ,..r ,t14°,..f.'*. 0-- ,,,,,, 94 . A CC3 . •;.I._.• W i 4',.■ ';' ' tt.1 0" 0., i . i- N 2 0 ..:t.. 0 — R, , •,=— = ,.,, CC C•1 i§ 1 ci- . 5 (0 - ':-.4ii 4 i - 4 "c5 -,,.. 1$iti"i W .4,444 N _1 , I-" ' 1' ' 4.' ''('''''''' -1 zz P E—, ,,, .4, '1' 0,,c' .- „,e.,i ''''' e„1 -.• le to ../i.'\ '4*;t4, c`l ,\Ir ,,A w' ' ,, 1 i,! t7 _ .s i ',-; g o ,...% (0 1... m„-,,,,,,e-y?, , ' ,,., - ),- 4,,,,w., --) 't ^••'11 i Z d'if1-4-1 H 1 ' ur 01 ;0 ,' , *it.:,,,.; ,M I n I I I 4 I,I 4 p„■i,. ,(h`,,0.",, t>ij,„;,„ , ' .&...,,, ' ,_......,.,.. ".M;t N,' t ,s 'M,.. -'g , tt r-r,• --! ct:,:7,::-,---z,,-.:„ .. ,... .-r.:..„..,,.:. -- .- - 7.- iiili I- ; g ,.,...., p\1322-rockedge\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-COUNTY11322-ROCKEDGE-CNTY dwg WETLAND IMPACTS MAP 11/2/2015 - w a � w Y e \1 a U o N rn 8 egi 8 ^ g a m W U 2 4 2 1 3 `2, ^ 2 m 2 g m n m N g n `q- 0 1 0 N Q . n m N C $ Q o O b G en ... V1 .- V co l7 (M f,.; 1 U W $ '8 2 w o w s c �� �,� Y Y W o o 'a ° 0 3 3 m n ti i. m m m > z P a ' a g z 3 z a x = 0 0 0 te a g a > > >5 x Q , , , o ;0 o O O P O O a 3 g x x x '^ t� t� LA c N c 9 5 QZ c a W _ C� :46.441 P J C �2 a a 2' Z J p 2 QZ6 Z Z Z 4' W W W z Z Z O , N a 4l �' ? V1 . , J m = 7 Q Q W W W W 5 J 5 a a U Z_ Z Z 1 5 Z o o O,N s.0 n a a a X o °a 3 ti. m $ 3 S„ O O ua v� u 3 3 431 A� II CD v4 M N f M .0. I n N 6V M V _ {� < M m to a N W o N 1 V O .�-1 74 W O (V N m a 3 „ i = N h h v m .Wi Q O Wv .Wi W W = V 1 ,1 - o o C 7 0 v c O O o r w =0 N ro �D -n N N N N m M cl V h . 0 a. a _ v v v co r� Co to CD to to to m h 0 w m w o F- ;� t N § � zw W - s o o U -9 vii 0 - t 4 ± Y a. to I 0 Q h3 to d ` tY. LU Clt Ili Ill ; C}' Nt1. i Y 0 J d vc� w to- c CO U4 U_ � a to ' � v ¢ v cl ° "-. lid tt t Fir G a 0 `3 ` z cc° w to A 0;1 �.� � W � _' al 0 1!A ,,,,,,4., 7S,\\_. f ' r 1 if,y ~-1 CD O to_W_ V) _ If ' 2p r f"7 ' w p a o ri �' 4.p h y i a CBxia s°r� 3 ZZZZY w°3 y zz`_zz F > >_ �o g x J ,{ r F _£.:... r.A, t W iL W 6 H f M O t \\ 11 41 �� r 1 \ +t Off .N tJ!to rn — . x= - 4 E Z Z Z W O F of y 1 - °©1119 N311100 U) Z . • rcc o:\1322-rockedge\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-COUNTY\1322-ROCKEDGE-CNTY.dw0 FLUCCS MAP 11/2/2015 tZ:r 11.1 c LILL I's j i 0 C") C,I 04 :.-, ;1-.4 <,0 C(Nsil iT 1 g F-4,a i 0 U.' Et .. 1.IJ > , 2 •,,... LL,I . —1 U) < . . , .... u.i tz a. L.... .1 :"' o. , ,,, . , ', .. '., 1.. . . „ . , , , ,,, —1 .. . ,. „ . ,..„ ..,.. . . I— : W : ,...... I..; ,.. , , `. P a.,),,, u) : ± ci.-. . . . „ .. .• EL . • ,:.CL ili•- '. , • 0 0- ..- 0 : -... , ,. :.:i.,,,...........,,. , CL) p ,77,17., •F'•., C:1 , ••.:. •• , . ,.•. cCt C—) , Z •''' •••• c.ip ,,, ,z,.. ',if • ''— : , : I "I 0 .. .. . .„ . . 1 ILI 0-1' ..1 :., ',, ,■-■,, = 1,1) •• g.-5 .2 L" ,"z• •• , • , , : , • ' .,. ' uj 1 , , i , ..1.e"--.',.•„ ,1.1.1 . ."' x 0- 1' .... 4 v.,: ,r.;.,=, ,....„... ", ,,,.....„„.„, .„.„.„,..,„,..., .. . 1 c, o = \ •■ ' c. 1.7-1 crA1322-rockedge\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-COUNTY11322-ROCKEDGE-CNTY.dwq PROPOSED SITE 11/2/2015 O ` �� w I. g:`-'t U _ .�1. Z co M . - 3 - 4 N .r I'''' , o o N■ r' , - wmw .. g OA z z o 9 i1 i- .: .. 3 z W , , - _ � - ,� mac a ❑ v (/) dW,I _ > P.. .. .. (n Q 3. J j( �'" [ • . bfa r xn x. N °°b .. 10. Z a� 4 b I J z Y o 0 i ° a • �� '' !' on C ;, o Tnr 6-7 . •_ 7 ar P'` . 1 E z K z % > o �. t,-..-4', g . - r H.' " P` M o Fg 1 "0. QAVB 21311103 _. r" A,t .t .x ' ! G '. 7 g NI p\1322-rockedgeHEETERMIT-COUNTY\1322-ROCKEDGE-CNTY.dwg PROPOSED SITE ON AERIAL 11/2/2015 ...d \CAD\S \P 1 , '.0 c N Lb - 1 O p 6!� 4Z LI - 9 > 3 Z 4 IL E CA W 5 d. Y.a O P • .' 4 } i ,--„, o o .14 g r J a o r , d = �i4 g >� , wm 0 • � ° U , • a ;s 7.r j 0i O r El gmw W . _ i / III . ,,,, .. , a = a 4 Q.. -.�° .• ,:f ' . S Q u W gJ �' • I- - vl . Z �, - z y I ' .J , -1 4 - •. �`� a m.+ t <�'!` 'fit. •�.�,.-_d__ -_ �,4 + � 1* Ilt i, S 14 I } 7 s J•' 4- A .1 , fI{` :k r t �'4 ' M - .. . 4 8 L / - �M ry * .. a ✓ •Mt - 't'S I114ex - , • rgxl ' T�,� ' 3Y. ¢ g z c om r VD■ . 7 H »7 cc3 w '1' 1 . y .J 1 i F. r. W ";°'T ,..—,� ._'4 ..,. w. a '°lam, '" -.r...i. , rf an18 d3n1o3. J .. -v3'*'� ., k .<; F awl. ., �.�,�w -,�`Mfa�; <. ,--r,;e^r R,..�,�•.� lI\VA 3 fj f ";' 2 _ L f p:\1322-rockedge\CAD\SHEET\PERMIT-COUNTY\1322-ROCKEDGE-CNTY.dwg EXISTING AERIAL 11/2/2015 iw w w U arty ? ,tee xn .' �— " Z \mil ' � ,,1 _ °a °a a iNe� 'x 0 4, ,,,,,,ilga.t, ,,,,,,,r.lots , , 1-- .. m dam w N o N 1a a s o o Z0 V a 1 , ' 0 hi i ' w ° W� ",, „ J� ! ''se+ E r a r'" "w a dad x , s tiw 4,1' ,t'l°7:4,:1';':':#., :4, /1, \'"'"-k/i.: li.1 6 v o F ,� •.n.. 31,4-;�` Ace. 0 : r� wa J O wa <O w� ZO a .Lu mg W w 2 ` mss Na oH , w r 02 : w Et) >. ,o, 0 _1 Hi!g N ce O N cc O LL LL U)Q O O W W _ V 0 . Q Z N ee aIlip n4" IC) nn CO c 0 i v V Z V .. co(U nn WSJ W �0 P: .. ill *PM= ii .y UU 3 imii • , W N=� a'a 1 ' k .—i w p - , y a, . ... _ I��C]' U Z O ,,,.., tit owl t w a a Duly OF MtiXtC� — 6'40. al 0 N Z a 1 z ua p:\1322-rockedge\CADISHEET\PERMIT-COUNTY11322-ROCKEDGE-CNTY.dwg LOCATION MAP 11/2/2015 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 ECOLOGICAL & BIOLOGICAL EXPERIENCE Floral and Faunal studies established and conducted in Alaska, Guatemala, Dominican Republic, Angola, and Zaire as well as throughout Florida. Studies conducted include species specific population surveys, vegetation density and diversity surveys, vegetation composition surveys, vegetation/ecological restoration projects. Work in Florida has been varied and ongoing for the last seventeen years. Some of the specific projects completed and/or underway include; • (2011- 2013) Managed a project (Bonita Trail) in the City of Bonita Springs along the Imperial River, where parking, boardwalk access, and a kayak ramp were planned, designed, permitted, construction plans were prepared and bid out, and construction was overseen. • (2011) Conducted a Panther Prey Survey on the Florida City Prison site and coordinated with the state and federal agencies with regards to Panther and Woodstork permitting issues. • (2011 and 2013) Provided lighting and signage coordination and design during activities by the Corps of Engineers in the Caloosahatchee Waterway for repairs and improvements to the Hoover Dike. • (2010- Present) Environmental Oversight for the Picayune Strand Restoration Project (Merritt, Faka Union, and Miller Pump Stations), part of the Everglades Restoration (CERP)Project. Services include weekly conference calls with engineers, consultants and governmental agencies; monthly wildlife education presentations for all new onsite employees; construction oversight; coordination of new nests and any wildlife sightings that are within construction limits or buffer zones; and environmental reporting requirements. • (2008-2009) Conducted the Environmental Assessment and wrote the Collier County Environmental Impact Statement for proposed improvements to the Collier Seminole State Park. • (1999- 2003) Environmental Manager for the permitting of the North Naples Regional Park. Work included environmental studies needed for permitting this 100-acre park and obtaining Environmental Resource Permits. • (1998-Present) Manages the restoration efforts on a 500+ acre mangrove preserve (Clam Bay) and producing the 10-Year Clam Bay Management Plan, conducts annual mangrove and submerged resource monitoring within the system and periodically the hardbottom offshore, analyzes water quality data, and provides recommendations for nutrient load reductions to Pelican Bay. 25 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 4.0 QUALIFICATIONS Tim Hall is a Principal at Turrell, Hall &Associates, Inc., and is also the Senior Ecologist for the firm. Tim works closely with federal, state, and local agencies to obtain approvals for a number of marina and residential development projects. His skills include plant and animal species identification, wildlife assessments, habitat assessments, wetland delineations, wildlife surveys, wetland restoration, and submerged resource surveys. EDUCATION Baccalaureate Studies: Wildlife Ecology University of Florida, 1986-1989 Masters Studies: Wildlife Ecology&Wetland Ecosystems University of Florida, 1990-1991 Continuing Education • 2014 Presented Paper at National Conference on Beach Preservation to Florida Shore & Beach Preservation Association(FSBPA), "Clam Bay; A Mangrove Restoration Success Story." • 2008 University of Florida-FDEP SOP Sampling Training for Groundwater, Surface Water and Wastewater • 2006 Florida Green Industries Best Management Practices Course • 2005 Florida Chamber's- Florida Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method Class • 2005 The Florida Chamber's-Growth Management and Environmental Permitting Short Course • 2003 Completed the Department of Environmental Protection Wetland Delineation Training Program. Fort Myers, Florida. • 2002 Completed the FAEP Plant Identification Class with Dr. David Hall ORGANIZATIONS • Naples Botanical Garden (former Director 1998-2000) • The Wildlife Society(former Florida Chapter At-Large Board Member 2010) • Florida Association of Environmental Professionals • Society of Wetland Scientists • Florida Native Plant Society CERTIFICATIONS • Certified Rescue Diver • Authorized Gopher Tortoise Agent 24 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 Habitat Unit value or PHU value. Total PHUs will be determined based on coordination with FWS. Florida Black Bears (Ursus americanus floridanus) No Florida black bears have been observed within the project area,however claw marks on a tree were observed. The project area has several habitat types that are suitable bear habitat. In a study generated by Cox et al., suitable bear habitats were classified into two broad categories; primary habitat and secondary habitat (Cox, J., R. Kautz, M. MacLaughlin, and T. Gilbert. 1994. Closing the gaps in Florida's wildlife habitat conservation system. Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission,Tallahassee, FL). Based on this classification system, the entire project area can be considered primary habitat. The project's listed species protection plan includes measures to enhance any remaining Florida black bear habitat on-site within the preserves. This will be accomplished through the removal of exotics and nuisance vines. Additionally, the proposed project will not conflict with the bear habitat management guidelines prescribed by FWC (reference: Maehr, David S.,T.S. Hoctor, L.J. Quinn, and J.S. Smith. 2001. Black bear habitat management guidelines for Florida; Technical Report#17. Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Tallahassee, FL). Florida Bonneted Bat(Eumops floridanus) The Florida bonneted bat utilizes habitats such as hardwoods and pinelands for foraging. A portion of the project area consists of pine flatwoods, pine-mesic oak, mixed hardwoods, mixed wetland hardwoods, and cypress-pine-palm habitats suitable for Florida bonneted bat foraging. The majority of this habitat will be impacted with the development of the proposed project, however there entire preserve area consists of habitat suitable for Florida bonneted bat foraging. The project's listed species protection plan includes measure to enhance any remaining suitable habitat on-site within the preserves. 3.4 PROJECT IMPACTS TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL RESOURCES As outlined in Section 2.4 of this report, the development of the Rockedge property will impact three of the nine archeological sites located on-site. Two of the sites are eligible to be listed in the National Register of Historic Places and are located within the preserve area of the project (see attached report). A qualified archeologist will be on-site during initial clearing activities to ensure that no impacts occur to any sites or artifacts. If a suspected archaeological or historical artifact is discovered during the course of site development activities (construction, clearing, etc.), the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. Coordination with DHR is on-going and all recommendations will be considered moving forward. 23 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 The proposed project will impact 30.53 acres of wetlands on-site, however these areas are not favorable foraging habitat for the wood stork. The foraging opportunities provided can vary significantly during a given year due to a wide array of factors that include, but are not limited to: water levels present; variable abundance of prey species; and available access of prey species to wetland areas. The proposed wetland preserve area will result in the preservation of suitable wood stork foraging and nesting habitats. Various Listed Wading Birds Snowy egrets(Egretta thula),tricolored herons(Egretta tricolor),and white ibis(Eudocimus alba) have been observed either flying overhead or foraging in the wetlands on-site and within the vicinity of the site. No nests of these species have been observed on the project area. In addition to the observed species, other listed wading birds that could frequent appropriate habitats within the project area include roseate spoonbills (Ajaja ajaja), little blue herons (Egretta caerulea), and limpkins(Aramus guarauna). Development of the project area will result in the loss of some of on-site wetlands thereby reducing potential foraging habitats for the listed wading birds mentioned. The on-site preserve will enhance existing habitats and the planned stormwater ponds will provide new foraging opportunities. Eastern Indigo Snake(Drymarchon corals couperi) No indigo snakes have been observed on-site and the majority of the project area does not provide particularly suitable habitat for indigo snakes. Considering their elusive nature, their large home range, and the wide array of habitats they may utilize,there remains a limited potential that indigo snakes could occasionally frequent portions of the project area. The listed species protection plan adopted as part of the Rockedge project includes appropriate measure for helping ensure the protection of indigo snakes throughout the operational life of the project. The particulars of the protection plan for indigo snakes set forth in the species protection plan follows the FWS's prescribed"Standard Protection Measures for the Eastern Indigo Snake." There are no gopher tortoise burrows or armadillo burrows on-site where an indigo snake could be buried or trapped and injured during project activities. In consideration of these points and given the limited probability of any indigo snakes occurring on-site, it is anticipated that the Rockedge project may affect,but is not likely to adversely affect this species. Florida Panthers(Puma concolor corgi) Primary Zone panther habitat conservation overlays encompass the project area, although no Florida panthers have been observed on-site. Development of the Rockedge project will permanently impact 29.93 acres of wetlands and 52.54 acres of uplands within the Primary Zone. The FWS has established panther Habitat Sustainability Values (HSVs) for various types of habitats with scores (values) ranging from 0 (no value) to 9.5 (optimal value). When the acreage of a given habitat type(polygon)is multiplied by the habitats HSV,the result is termed the Panther 22 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 contiguous to off-site systems and will not be cut off by the existing surrounding development and development proposed on-site. 3.2.2 Temporary Impacts No temporary impacts are expected with this development. Prior to construction commencement all preserved areas will be enclosed with siltation-prevention devices,which will remain in place until the adjacent construction is completed. 3.2.3 Secondary Impacts to Wetlands & Water Resources The proposed layout of the project's development features will directly impact 29.74 acres of on-site wetlands and 0.60 acres of secondary impacts, and preserve 24.20 acres of on-site wetlands and uplands. Adjacent properties are already developed with multi-family developments, single family homes and nurseries,therefore no secondary impacts to off-site wetlands is expected. The on-site wetlands to be preserved will also be utilized for stormwater management. The wetlands are isolated on the north and east side as a result of the multi-family development being constructed. To manage stormwater for the proposed project and to ensure the health of the remaining wetlands on-site, the stormwater from the site will be routed back into the wetland preserve, thereby increasing on-site storage and retention, and maintaining the appropriate water levels for the type of systems present in the preserve area. The inflow of water will be in a more concentrated timeframe,however long- term inundation will be appropriate for the habitat types present. 3.3 PROJECT IMPACTS TO LISTED SPECIES A survey for listed animal and plant species was conducted on the project site by THA biologists. This listed species survey and its results are discussed in the attached Threatened and Endangered Species Survey. The listed animals associated with this project site as observed directly or indirectly by THA included the white ibis and bald eagle (seen flying overhead above the project site). The snowy egret,tri-colored heron,and woodstork were seen utilizing canals adjacent to the property. Currently there are no documented active eagle's nests within close proximity(5 miles) of the project site. And no listed plant species were documented on-site. The following subsections provide an assessment of the proposed project's potential impacts to various listed animal species. The species addressed include those observed on or in close proximity to the subject property as well as certain species that could potentially occur on the Rockedge site or on nearby off-site parcels. Wood Storks (Mvcteria americana) No wood stork nests, rookeries, or roosting sites have been found on the subject property. The closest documented wood stork colony is located approximately 18 miles to the northeast at North Catherine Island II. Very little of the site is appropriate for foraging, however, there is suitable foraging habitat in the vicinity of the site. A portion of the site is appropriate for establishment of a small rookery. This portion of the site is to be preserved. 21 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 Upland Habitat FLUCCS Code Acreage Pine Flatwood 411 12.05 Pine—Mesic Oak 414 5.25 Pine—Mesic Oak(51-75%Exotics) 414E3 7.97 Pine—Mesic Oak(76-100%Exotics) 414E4 8.30 Cabbage Palm 428 0.35 Mixed Hardwood 438 1.35 Disturbed Areas 740 1.11 Roads and Highways 814 0.15 36.53 Table 3 -Required Native Habitat/Preserve Acreage Summary Acreage Total Project Area 106.44 Wetland Area 52.62 Upland Area 53.82 Total Native Habitat Area 85.17 Native Wetland 47.47 Native Upland 34.34 Additional Acreage re Past Code Enforcement Case 3.36 Preserve 25%required for Residential Use 21.29 Proposed Preserve 24.20 3.2 PROJECT IMPACTS TO WETLANDS 3.2.1 Direct, Permanent Impacts Development of the proposed project cannot be done without impacting some wetlands. The location of the wetlands on the project site are primarily on the northern and eastern side of the project area. The project will result in direct,permanent impacts to a total of 29.74 acres of jurisdictional wetlands and 0.60 acres of secondary impacts. As used herein, the term "direct impacts"refers to actions that will result in the complete elimination of jurisdictional areas (i.e. dredging and filling). The remainder of the existing wetlands on-site will be preserved or retained. The wetlands proposed to be impacted are all heavily degraded by exotic vegetation. UMAM scores for the existing functional values of these wetlands range from 0.27 — 0.63. The wetlands to be preserved on the eastern side of the property are 20 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 3.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS (POST—DEVELOPMENT) 3.1 PROPOSED PROJECT The proposed project will impact a portion of the existing wetlands on the site. These wetlands have been degraded to extreme degrees by exotic vegetation infestations and alteration of the hydrology on-site and off-site. The enclosed exhibits illustrate the wetlands that will be impacted by development. In addition to the wetland impacts, most of the uplands on the project site will also be impacted. A residential development of this size in Collier County is required by Section 3.05.07 of the Land Development Code (LDC) to preserve 25% of the existing native habitat on-site. Of the 106.44 acres approximately 81.81 acres meets the County definition for native habitat. An additional 3.36 acres of the site had been impacted in the past by previous owners and while it is no longer composed of native vegetation this acreage has been included in the native habitat requirements due to the past code enforcement actions. Previous reference to the impacts associated with the code violation was for 3.42 acres but 0.06 acre has apparently regenerated with native vegetation and has been included in the native FLUCFCS code polygons. Per the County Code, 21.29 acres of native habitat would need to be preserved. The project proposes to preserve 24.20 acres of native habitat, exceeding this requirement. Table 2—Native Habitat FLUCFCS Codes&Acreages Wetland Habitat FLUCCS Code Acreage Cabbage Palm—Hydric 428H 0.44 Cabbage Palm—Hydric(51-75%Exotics) 428HE3 3.20 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods 617 1.25 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods(0-25%Exotics) 617E1 5.56 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods(76-90%Exotics) 617E4 1.45 Willow and Elderberry 618 0.86 Willow and Elderberry(51-75%Exotics) 618E3 3.18 Cypress(51-75%Exotics) 621E3 1.33 Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm(0-25% Exotics) 624E1 5.91 Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm(51-75%Exotics) 624E3 14.65 Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm(76-90%Exotics) 624E4 1.71 Wetland Scrub(0-25%Exotics) 631E1 4.61 Wetland Scrub(26-50%Exotics) 631E2 0.26 Wetland Scrub(51-75%) 631E3 3.06 Borrow Areas(OSW) 742 1.17 48.64 19 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 With proper water-control measures, these soils are well suited to citrus. A water-control system is needed to remove excess water during the wet season. They are well suited to pangolagrass, bahiagrass, and clover. Excellent pastures of grass and grass-clover mixture can be grown with good management. Regular applications of fertilizer and controlled grazing are needed for the highest possible yields. These soils are moderately suited to range. The dominant forage consists of creeping bluestem, lopsided indiangrass, and chalky bluestem. Management practices should include deferred grazing and bursh control. The Hilolo, Jupiter, and Margate soils are in the Upland Hardwood Hammock range site. These soils have severe limitations for most urban uses because of wetness and depth to bedrock. They have severe limitations for septic tank absorption fields because of wetness, depth to bedrock,poor filtration, and slow percolation. If these soils are used as a septic tank absorption field,they should be mounded to maintain the system well above the seasonal high water table. For recreational uses, these soils also have severe limitations because of wetness, depth to bedrock, and the sandy texture; however,with proper drainage to remove the excess surface water during wet periods, many of the effects of these limitations can be overcome. The Hilolo soil is in capability subclass IIIw. The Jupiter and Margate soils are in capability subclass IVw. 18 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 These nearly level poorly drained soils are on hammocks and flatwoods. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape, and they range from 5 to 600 acres in size. The slope is 0 to 2 percent. Typically, the Hilolo soil has a surface layer of very dark grayish brown fine sand about 9 inches thick. The subsurface layer is dark grayish brown fine sand to a depth of about 12 inches. The subsoil extends to a depth of about 50 inches. The upper part of the subsoil is light brownish gray fine sandy loam,then next part is light gray sandy clay loam and fine sandy loam, and the lower part is gray fine sandy loam. The substratum is light olive gray loam fine sand to a depth of about 61 inches. Typically, the Jupiter soil has a surface layer of black fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is very dark grayish brown fine sand to a depth of about 10 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 10 inches. Typically,the Margate soil has a surface layer of black fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is light brownish gray fine sand to a depth of about 17 inches. The subsoil is brown fine sand to a depth of about 35 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 35 inches. Mapped areas can consist entirely of Hilolo soil, entirely of Jupiter soil, entirely of Margate soil, or any combination of the three soils. These three soils were not separated into mapping because of similar soil characteristics and management needs. The characteristics of Boca, Ft. Drum, and Hallandale soils are similar to those of major soils. The dissimilar soils in this map unit are small areas of Holopaw and Pineda soils in sloughs. These soils make up about 10 percent of the unit. The permeability in the Hilolo soil is moderately slow to slow, and the available water capacity is moderate. The permeability of Jupiter and Margate soils are rapid and available water capacity is very low. Under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table is at a depth of 6 to 18 inches for 1 to 6 months during most years. During the other months, the water table is below a depth of 18 inches, and it recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. The natural vegetation consists mostly of cabbage palm, saw palmetto, chalky bluestem, broomsedge bluestem, scattered areas of water oaks, and pineland threeawn. These soils are poorly suited to cultivated crops because of the wetness and droughtiness. The number of adapted crops is limited unless very intensive management practices are used. With good water-control and soil-improving measures, these soils are suitable for many fruit and vegetable crops. A water-control system is needed to remove excess water during wet seasons and provide water through subsurface irrigation during dry seasons. Row crops should be rotated with cover crops. Seedbed preparation should include bedding of the rows. Applications of fertilizer and lime should be based on the needs of the crops. 17 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 Typically, the Copeland soil has a surface layer of black fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 18 inches; the upper part is very dark grayish brown and the lower part is dark gray. The subsoil is light gray mottled, sandy clay loam to a depth of about 24 inches. The substratum is light gray marl to a depth of about 30 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 30 inches. Areas mapped can consist entirely of Boca soil, Riviera, limestone substratum, soil Copeland soil, or any combination of the three soils. These three soils were not separated in mapping because of similar management needs brought about by ponding. The characteristics of Holopaw, Malabar and Pineda soils are similar. Soils of dissimilar characteristics included in these units are small areas of Basinger, Dania, Gator and Hallendale soils on similar landscape positions. These soils make up about 20 percent or less of the units. The permeability of the Boca soil is moderate and the available water capacity is very low. The permeability of the Riviera soils is moderately rapid to moderately slow and the available water capacity is low. The permeability of the Copeland soil is moderated and the available water capacity is moderate. In most years,under natural conditions, these soils are ponded for 6 to 9 months or more each year. In other months the water table is within 12 inches of the surface and recedes to a depth of 12 to 40 inches during extended dry periods. These soils are not suited for cultivated crops or citrus because of flooding,ponding and wetness. These soils are used for natural wetlands. Natural vegetation consists mostly of bald cypress, pickerelweed, rushes, fire flag, saw grass and Florida willow. The Boca, Riviera and Copeland soils have no range site. These soils are in the Cypress Swamp ecological community. These soils have severe limitations for all urban and recreational uses because of ponding. An effective drainage system that keeps the water table at a given depth is expensive and difficult to establish and maintain. Also, these soils act as a collecting basin for the area; therefore, a suitable outlet to remove the water is not available. These soils require an adequate amount of fill material to maintain house foundations and roadbeds above the high water table. Even when a good drainage systems is installed and the proper amount of fill material is added,keeping the area dry is a continuing problem because of seepage water from the slightly higher adjacent sloughs and flatwoods. The Boca, Riviera and Copeland soils are in capability subclass VIIw. (31)—Hilolo,Jupiter, and Margate fine sands 16 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 The permeability of these soils is slow to very slow. The Available water capacity of the Chobee and Winder soils is moderate and of the Gator soil is high. In most years,under natural conditions, these soils are ponded for 6 to 9 months or each year. In other months the water table is with 12 inches of the surface and recedes to a depth of 12 to 40 inches during extended dry periods. These soils are not suited for cultivated crops or citrus because of flooding,ponding and wetness. These soils are used for natural wetlands. Natural vegetation consists of pickerelweed, maidencane, rushes, fire flag, saw grass, Florida willow and a few Cypress. These soils are moderately suited for desirable range plant production. The dominant forage is maidencane and cutgrass. Since the depth of the water table fluctuates throughout the year, a natural deferment from cattle grazing occurs. Although this rest period increases forage production, the periods of high water may reduce the grazing value of the site. The Chobee, Winder and Gator soils are in the Freshwater Marshes and Ponds range site. These soils have severe limitations for all urban and recreational uses because of ponding. An effective drainage system that keeps the water table at a given depth is expensive and difficult to establish and maintain. Also, these soils act as a collecting basin for the area; therefore, a suitable outlet to remove the water is not available. These soils require an adequate amount of fill material to maintain house foundations and roadbeds above the high water table. Muck should be removed before adding fill material. Even when a good drainage system is installed and proper amount of fill material is added,keeping the area dry is a continuing problem because of seepage water from the slightly higher adjacent sloughs and flatwoods. The Chobee,Winder and Gator soils are in capability subclass VIIw. (25)Boca,Riviera, Limestone Substratum and Copeland Fine Sands,Depressional These level, very poorly drained soils are found primarily in depressions, cypress swamps and marshes. This soil mapping unit is found in the southwest corner of the project area within the area identified as wetlands. Individual areas are elongated and irregular in shape and range from 100 to 3000 acres. The slope is 0 to 1 percent. Typically,the Boca soil has surface layer of very dark gray fine sand to a depth of about 26 inches; the upper part is light gray and the lower part is brown. The subsoil is dark grayish brown fine sandy loam to a depth of about 30 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 30 inches. Typically, the Riviera soil has a surface layer of gray fine sand about 6 inches thick. The subsurface layer is fine sand to a depth of about 32 inches; the upper part is light brownish gray and the lower part is light gray. The subsoil is sandy clay loam to a depth of about 54 inches; the upper par is grayish brown and the lower part is dark gray. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of about 54 inches. 15 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 Drainage/Hydrologic characteristics — Poorly drained. Permeability is slow. The seasonal high water table (apparent) is within a depth of 12 inches for 3 to 6 months and can recede to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. Hydrologic group is B/D. (21) Boca Fine Sand Landscape position—Flatwoods. Soil profile —The surface layer is typically a very dark gray fine sand about 4 inches thick. The subsurface is fine sand to a depth of about 26 inches. The subsoil is dark grayish brown fine sandy loam to a depth of about 30 inches. Limestone bedrock is at a depth of around 30 inches. Drainage/Hydrologic characteristics — Poorly drained. Permeability is moderate. Under natural conditions, the seasonal high water table (apparent) is set at a depth of 6 to 18 inches for 1 to 6 months during most years. During the other months,the water table is below a depth of 18 inches, and it recedes to a depth of more than 40 inches during extended dry periods. Hydrologic group is B/D. (22) Chobee,Winder and Gator Soils,Depressional These level,very poorly drained soils are found primarily in depressions and marshes. Within the project area, this soil mapping unit is found primarily within the area identified as wetlands. Individual areas are circular or elongated in shape and range from 5 to 200 acres. The slope is 0 to 1 percent. Typically, the Chobee soil has a surface layer of black fine sandy loam about 13 inches thick. The subsoil is mottled sand clay loam to a depth of about 47 inches; the upper part is dark gray and the lower part is gray. The substratum is dark greenish gray and gray fine sandy loam to a depth of about 80 inches. Typically, the Winder soil has a surface layer of dark gray fine sand about 5 inches thick. The subsurface layer is light brownish gray fine sand to a depth of about 15 inches. The subsoil is to a depth of about 50 inches; the upper part is gray fine sandy loam, the middle part is gray sandy clay loam and the lower part dark gray sandy clay loam. The substratum is white fine sandy loam to a depth of about 80 inches. Typically, the Gator soil has a surface soil of black muck about 25 inches thick. The substratum is very dark gray, grayish brown, greenish gray and light gray fine sandy loam to a depth of about 80 inches. Areas mapped can consist entirely of Chobee soil, Winder soil, Gator soil, or any combination of the three soils. The three soils were not separated in mapping because of similar management needs brought about by ponding. Soils of dissimilar characteristics included in this map unit are small areas of Pineda and Riviera soils on similar landscape positions. These soils make up about 17 percent or less of the unit. 14 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 (Mycteria americana)were observed. None of the listed species observed,reside on or nest within the project area. Due to isolation, exotic species encroachment and degradation of foraging habitat, it is apparent that this site offers only minimal value to local wildlife. The new multi-family development to the north and east of the project area as well as historic development to the east and a major roadway to the west have somewhat isolated this property and made travel to it by terrestrial wildlife difficult. 2.4 HISTORICAL/ ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES The Florida Master Site File(MSF)is a database of the known historic and archaeological sites in the state of Florida. The MSF office was contacted and the response back indicated that there are several recorded archaeological sites exist on the subject property or in close proximity. Five of the located sites are potentially eligible to be registered on the National Register of Historic Places, with two of those sites being regarded as the most historically significant and located within the preserve area. As a result of these findings the project has been designed to avoid impact to 6 of these sites, including the sites eligible for registration. If a suspected archaeological or historical artifact is discovered during the course of site development activities (construction, clearing, etc.), the development activities at the specific site will be immediately halted and the appropriate agency notified. Development will be suspended for a sufficient length of time to enable the County or a designated consultant to assess the find and determine the proper course of action. 2.5 SOILS Based on the National Resource Conservation Service (NRCS) "Soil Survey of Collier County Area, Florida" (NRCS, 1998)there are two (5) different soil types (soil map units) present on the project lands. Exhibit 8 provides a soils map for the project area as derived from the NRCS mapping. The following sub-sections provide a brief description of each soil map unit identified on the project lands. Information is provided about the soil's landscape position (i.e. it's typical location in the landscape on a county-wide basis), the soil's profile (i.e. textural composition and thickness or depth range of the layers or horizons commonly present in the soil), and the soil's drainage and hydrologic characteristics. The soils occurring on project lands are as follows: (14) Pineda Fine Sand,Limestone Substratum Landscape position—Sloughs and poorly defined drainageways. Soil profile—Surface layer to a depth of about 4 inches consists of dark grayish brown fine sand. Subsurface layer to depth of about 12 inches consist of light brownish gray fine sand. Subsurface layers below this to a depth of 55 inches consist of sand or fine sand.Below these layers the subsoil is brownish yellow fine sandy loam, dark grayish brown sandy clay loam. Limestone bedrock begins at a depth of about 55 inches. 13 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 THA biologists flagged the boundaries of those areas which are considered wetlands according to the state and federal guidelines. There were very few cases where it appeared wetland lines established based on the state methodology would differ from those established based on the federal (USACE)methodology. Where this did occur, the feature boundary was flagged based on the landward-most extent of the two methods—in other words, the methodology that produced the greatest extent of wetlands was used to flag the wetland line. 2.2.1 Wetland Seasonal High Water Table & Hydroperiod The hydrologic regime on this property is extremely altered from historical levels and patterns by surrounding urban uses. Water marks on trees indicate standing water during rainy season was approximately 24-36" in the deeper wetland systems and 12-18" in the shallower systems. Upon site visit during wet season this year, standing water levels were approximately 12-24" in the deeper systems and 0-6" in the shallower areas. Water from adjacent properties is now partially cut off as a result of the construction of a multi-family housing development to the north. The majority of the site has been overrun with exotic vegetation to the point where wildlife utilization is reduced. With the site lying between development and major roadways, this wetland habitat cannot maintain the normal hydrology that was historically present due to blockages to surficial flows from the surrounding developments. 2.2.2 Jurisdictional Status of Wetlands & Other Surface Waters The wetland lines established are jurisdictional with both the State and Federal permitting agencies per their delineation guidelines. This was established by ACOE preliminary jurisdictional determination number SAJ-2004-08707 and South Florida Water Management District Informal Wetland Determination number 140416-1. All wetland boundaries flagged by staff biologists were field located with handheld GPS units. 2.3 LISTED PLANT & ANIMAL SPECIES A survey for listed animal and plant species has been conducted within the project area by THA biologists. This threatened and endangered species survey and its results are discussed in the attached Appendix A. The Threatened & Endangered Species report describes the approximate locations where listed animal species were observed on and near the project area during the course of the referenced survey. The only listed animal species observed were either flying over the project area or observed on adjacent parcels. During the survey events white ibis (Eudocimus albus) and bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) flew over the site. In the canals on the adjacent property Snowy Egret (Egretta thula), Tri-colored heron (Egretta tricolor), and Woodstork 12 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Rare Dahoon holly Ilex cassine C Rare Swamp bay Persea palustris C Rare Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia G Dominant Dog fennel Eupatorium capillifolium G Dominant Wild coffee Psychotria nervosa G Common Short-leafed wild coffee Psychotria tenuifolia G Common Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Rare Broom grass Andropogon glomeratus G Rare Germander Teucrium canadense G Rare Oakleaf fleabane Erigeron quercifolius G Rare Beaksedge Rhynchospora spp. G Rare 740—Disturbed Land, 14.34 acres Dog fennel Eupatorium capillifolium G Dominant Bushy bluestem Andropogon glomeratus G Common Napiergrass Pennisetum purpureum G Common Caesar weed Urena lobata G Common Southern sandbur Cenchrus echinatus G Rare Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia G Rare Giant brake fern Pteris tripartite G Rare 740HE4—Disturbed Land—Hydric—3.38 acres Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia C, M, &G Dominant Carolina willow Salix caroliniana M Rare Salt bush Baccharis halimifolia G Dominant Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium G Dominant Bushy bluestem Andropogom glomeratus G Common Beaksedge Rhynchospora spp. G Occasional Germander Teucrium canadense G Occasional Red maple Acer rubrum G Occasional 2.2 WETLANDS & OTHER SURFACE WATERS Qualified Turrell, Hall&Associates, Inc. (THA) environmental staff inspected the project site for the purpose of delineating wetlands and other surface waters. The wetland delineation methodologies and criteria set forth by the state(in Chapter 62-340, FAC, Delineation of the Landward Extent of Wetlands and Surface Waters)and the US Army Corps of Engineers (in the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual)were followed in determining whether an area was considered as a wetland or other surface water and in delineating the limits (boundaries)of potential jurisdictional wetlands and other surface waters. 11 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 Cypress Taxodium distichum C Rare Carolina willow Salix caroliniana C &M Occasional Red maple Acer rubrum C Rare Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Rare Dahoon holly Ilex cassine C Rare Swamp bay Persea palustris C Rare Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia G Dominant Dog fennel Eupatorium capillifolium G Dominant Wild coffee Psychotria nervosa G Common Short-leafed wild coffee Psychotria tenuifolia G Common Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Rare Broom grass Andropogon glomeratus G Rare Germander Teucrium canadense G Rare Oakleaf fleabane Erigeron quercifolius G Rare Beaksedge Rhynchospora spp. G Rare 631E2—Wetland Scrub—0.26 acres Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M, &G Common Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M, &G Common Cypress Taxodium distichum C Rare Carolina willow Salix caroliniana C &M Occasional Red maple Acer rubrum C Rare Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Rare Dahoon holly Ilex cassine C Rare Swamp bay Persea palustris C Rare Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia G Dominant Dog fennel Eupatorium capillifolium G Dominant Wild coffee Psychotria nervosa G Common Short-leafed wild coffee Psychotria tenuifolia G Common Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Rare Broom grass Andropogon glomeratus G Rare Germander Teucrium canadense G Rare Oakleaf fleabane Erigeron quercifolius G Rare Beaksedge Rhynchospora spp. G Rare 631E3 —Wetland Scrub—3.06 acres Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M, &G Dominant Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M, &G Common Cypress Taxodium distichum C Rare Carolina willow Salix caroliniana C &M Occasional Red maple Acer rubrum C Rare 10 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 624E3 —Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm— 14.65 acres Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia C &M Common Cypress Taxodium distichum C Common Red maple Acer rubrum C, M, &G Common Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C,M&G Common Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Occasional Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C Common Pond apple Annona glabra C Rare Dahoon holly Ilex cassine M Rare Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Dominant Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia G Rare False buttonweed Spermacoce prostrate G Rare Musky mint Hyptis alata G Rare Pickerelweed Pontederia cordata G Rare Buttonbush Cephlanthus occidentalis G Rare Saw grass Cladium jamaicense G Occasional Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia G Occasional 624E4—Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm— 1.71 acres Cypress Taxodium distichum C, M, &G Common Red maple Acer rubrum C, M, &G Common Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia C, M&G Dominant Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C &M Common Pond apple Annona glabra C &M Occasional False nettle Boehmeria cylindrica G Occasional Pickerelweed Pontederia cordata G Occasional Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Dominant Sawgrass Cladium jamaicense G Occasional Musky mint Hyptis alata G Occasional Buttonbush Cephlantus occidentalis G Occasional Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia G Occasional Alligator flag Thalia geniculate G Occasional Spadderdock Nuphar advena G Occasional American white waterlily Nymphaea odorata G Occasional Waterhyssop Bacopa monnieri G Common Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia M&G Dominant 631E1 —Wetland Scrub—4.61 acres Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M, & G Common Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M, &G Common 9 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 Carolina Willow Salix caroliniana C, M, & G Dominant Pop ash Fraxinus caroliniana C, M& G Common Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C Common Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C Dominant Red Maple Acer rubrum C Common Cypress Taxodium distichum C Common False nettle Boehmeria cylindrica G Occasional Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium G Common Swamp Fern Blechnum serrulatum G Common Eastern blue-eyed grass Sisyrinchium atlanticum G Occasional Buttonbush Cephlanthus occidentalis G Occasional Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia G Occasional Alligator flag Thalia geniculata G Rare 621E3 —Cypress— 1.33 acres Cypress Taxodium distichum C &M Dominant Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M, &G Common Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Occasional Brazilian Pepper Schinus terebinthifolia M Common Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Common Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia G Rare False buttonweed Spermacoce prostrata G Rare 624E1 —Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm—5.91 acres Cypress Taxodium distichum C, M, &G Dominant Red maple Acer rubrum C, M, & G Dominant Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia C, M&G Common Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C &M Common Pond apple Annona glabra C &M Occasional False nettle Boehmeria cylindrica G Occasional Pickerelweed Pontederia cordata G Occasional Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Dominant Sawgrass Cladium jamaicense G Occasional Musky mint Hyptis alata G Occasional Buttonbush Cephlantus occidentalis G Occasional Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia G Occasional Alligator flag Thalia geniculate G Occasional Spadderdock Nuphar advena G Occasional American white waterlily Nymphaea odorata G Occasional Waterhyssop Bacopa monnieri G Common Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia M &G Common 8 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 Wild coffee Psychotria nervosa G Common Short-leaved wild coffee Psychotria tenuifolia G Common Round leaf greenbrier Smilax rotundifolia G Common Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans G Common 617E4—Mixed Wetland Hardwood— 1.45 acres Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia C, M&G Dominant Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M, & G Dominant Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Common Cypress Taxodium distichum C Common Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C &G Occasional Java plum Syzygium cumini C &G Occasional Swamp bay Persea palustris C, M, &G Occasional Dahoon holly Ilex cassine C, M, &G Occasional Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M, & G Common Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M &G Occasional Salt bush Baccharis halimifolia G Dominant Shield fern Thelypteris hispidula G Common Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Common Wild coffee Psychotria nervosa G Common Short-leaved wild coffee Psychotria tenuifolia G Common Round leaf greenbrier Smilax rotundifolia G Common Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans G Common Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M, & G Dominant 618 Willow and Elderberry—0.86 acres Carolina Willow Salix caroliniana C, M, &G Dominant Pop ash Fraxinus caroliniana C,M& G Dominant Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C Common Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C Occasional Red Maple Acer rubrum C Common Cypress Taxodium distichum C Common False nettle Boehmeria cylindrica G Occasional Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium G Common Swamp Fern Blechnum serrulatum G Common Eastern blue-eyed grass Sisyrinchium atlanticum G Occasional Buttonbush Cephlanthus occidentalis G Occasional Ragweed Ambrosia artemisiifolia G Occasional Alligator flag Thalia geniculata G Rare 618E3 Willow and Elderberry—3.18 acres 7 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 438—Mixed Hardwoodes— 1.35 acres Java plum Syzygium cumini C Dominant Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Occasional Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia M Occasional Earleaf acacia Acacia auriculiformis C &M Occasional Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C &M Occasional Bishopwood Bishofia javanica C Rare Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquenervia C Occasional 617—Mixed Wetland Hardwood— 1.25 acres Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M, &G Dominant Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Common Cypress Taxodium distichum C Common Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C &G Occasional Java plum Syzygium cumini C & G Occasional Swamp bay Persea palustris C, M, &G Occasional Dahoon holly Ilex cassine C, M, &G Occasional Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M, &G Common Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M& G Occasional Salt bush Baccharis halimifolia G Dominant Shield fern Thelypteris hispidula G Common Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Common Wild coffee Psychotria nervosa G Common Short-leaved wild coffee Psychotria tenuifolia G Common Round leaf greenbrier Smilax rotundifolia G Common Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans G Common 617E1 —Mixed Wetland Hardwood—5.56 acres Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M, & G Dominant Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Common Cypress Taxodium distichum C Common Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C & G Occasional Java plum Syzygium cumini C &G Occasional Swamp bay Persea palustris C, M, &G Occasional Dahoon holly Ilex cassine C, M, &G Occasional Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M, &G Dominant Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M& G Occasional Salt bush Baccharis halimifolia G Dominant Shield fern Thelypteris hispidula G Common Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Common 6 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 Salt bush Baccharis halimifolia G Common Shield fern Thelypteris hispidula G Common Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Common Wild coffee Psychotria nervosa G Common Short-leaved wild coffee Psychotria tenuifolia G Common Round leaf greenbrier Smilax rotundifolia G Common Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans G Common 428—Cabbage Palm—0.35 acres Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M, &G Dominant Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Occasional Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia M&G Common Java plum Syzygium cumini M Common Wild coffee Psychotria nervosa G Dominant Short leaf wild coffee Psychotria tenuifolia G Common 428—Cabbage Palm—Hydric, 0.44 acres Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M, & G Dominant Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Occasional Red maple Acer rubrum C Rare Dahoon holly Ilex cassine C Rare Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia M& G Common Java plum Syzygium cumini M Common Wild coffee Psychotria nervosa G Dominant Short leaf wild coffee Psychotria tenuifolia G Common Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Common Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium G Common Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia G Occasional 4281-1E3 —Cabbage Palm—Hydric, 3.20 acres Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M, & G Common Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Occasional Red maple Acer rubrum C Rare Dahoon holly Ilex cassine C Rare Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia M& G Dominant Java plum Syzygium cumini M Common Wild coffee Psychotria nervosa G Dominant Short leaf wild coffee Psychotria tenuifolia G Common Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Common Dog Fennel Eupatorium capillifolium G Common Saltbush Baccharis halimifolia G Occasional 5 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 Short-leaf Wild Coffee Psychotria tenuifolia G Dominant Sword fern Nephrolepis exalta G Occasional Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Rare White stopper Eugenia axillaris G Rare 414E3 —Pine—Mesic Oak, 7.97 acres Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Dominant Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M, & G Common Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C,M,&G Common Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C Occasional Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M&G Occasional Roundleaf greenbrier Smilax rotundiflora G Common 414E4-Pine—Mesic Oak, 8.30 acres Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Common Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M, &G Common Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M, & G Dominant Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C Occasional Creeping oxeye Wedelia fruticosa G Common Roundleaf greenbrier Smilax laurifolia G Common Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans G Common 422 Brazilian Pepper—2.30 acres Brazilian Pepper Schinus terrebinthifolia C, M, & G Dominant Earleaf Acacia Acacia auriculiformis C Occasional Laurel Oak Quercus laurifolia C Occasional Creeping oxeye Wedelia fruticose G Common Roundleaf greenbrier Smilax laurifolia G Common 424H—Melaleuca—Hydric—0.55 acres Melaleuca Melaleuca quinquinervia C, M, & G Dominant Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M, &G Common Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Common Cypress Taxodium distichum C Common Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C &G Occasional Java plum Syzygium cumini C &G Occasional Swamp bay Persea palustris C, M, &G Occasional Dahoon holly Ilex cassine C, M, &G Occasional Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C, M, & G Common Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M &G Occasional 4 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 Cabbage Palm 428* 0.35 Mixed Hardwood 438* 1.35 Disturbed Land 740 ** 14.34 Roads and Highways 814*t 1.91 53.82 *Denotes native habitat per the Collier County Land Development Code **Denotes portions are considered native habitat per past compliance enforcement tDenotes a portion of this FLUCFCS Code is not native habitat per the Collier County Land Development Code Additional details related to the native habitat acreages and preserve calculations is found in Section 3.1 of this report. A list of plant species observed within each habitat type is found below. C=Canopy M=Midstory G=Groundcover V=Vine E=Epiphyte *-Protected species 411 —Pine Flatwoods, 12.05 acres Slash pine Pinus elliottii C &M Dominant Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C, M&G Dominant Brazilian pepper Schinus terebinthifolia C &G Rare Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C &M Rare Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M&G Common Swamp bay Persea palustris M Rare Wax myrtle Myrica cerifera M &G Occasional Wild coffee Psychotria nervosa G Dominant Short leaf wild coffee Psychotria tenuifolia G Common Swamp fern Blechnum serrulatum G Occasional Saw palmetto Serenoa repens G Common Greenbriar Smilax spp. V Occasional Grapevine Vitis rotundifolia V Occasional Poison ivy Toxicodendron radicans V Common 414—Pine—Mesic Oak, 5.25 acres Laurel oak Quercus laurifolia C Dominant Cabbage palm Sabal palmetto C Dominant Slash pine Pinus elliottii C Common Swamp bay Persea palustris C Occasional Java plum Syzygium cumini C Occasional Red mulberry Morus rubra C Rare Myrsine Myrsine guianensis M & G Common Dahoon holly Ilex cassine M Rare Wild coffee Psychotria nervosa G Dominant 3 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS (PRE-DEVELOPMENT) 2.1 VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS The existing habitat types (based on FLUCFCS codes) are shown in Table 1 below and Exhibit 5 (FLUCFCS Map). Of the total 106.44 acres contained within the Rockedge property boundary, 50.6%are considered uplands (53.82 ac.) and 49.4% are considered wetlands (51.40 ac. of wetlands and 1.22 ac. of OSW).The majority of the property has been infested to some degree by noxious exotic vegetation; including java plum, melaleuca, and Brazilian pepper. Table 1-FLUCFCS Codes& Acreages Wetland Habitat FLUCCS Code Acreage Melaleuca-Hydric 424H 0.55 Cabbage Palm-Hydric 428H* 0.44 Cabbage Palm-Hydric(51-75%Exotics) 428HE3* 3.20 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods 617* 1.25 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods(0-25%Exotics) 617E1* 5.56 Mixed Wetland Hardwoods(76-90%Exotics) 617E4* 1.45 Willow and Elderberry 618* 0.86 Willow and Elderberry(51-75%Exotics) 618E3* 3.18 Cypress(51-75%Exotics) 621E3* 1.33 Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm(0-25%Exotics) 624E1* 5.91 Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm(51-75%Exotics) 624E3* 14.65 Cypress-Pine-Cabbage Palm(76-90%Exotics) 624E4*f 1.71 Wetland Scrub(0-25%Exotics) 631E1* 4.61 Wetland Scrub(26-50%Exotics) 631E2* 0.26 Wetland Scrub(51-75%) 631E3* 3.06 Disturbed Land-Hydric(76-90%Exotics) 740HE4 3.38 Borrow Areas(OSW) 742**f 1.22 52.62 Upland Habitat FLUCCS Code Acreage Pine Flatwood 411* 12.05 Pine-Mesic Oak 414* 5.25 Pine-Mesic Oak(51-75%Exotics) 414E3* 7.97 Pine-Mesic Oak(76-100%Exotics) 414E4**t 8.30 Brazilian Pepper 422 2.30 2 Waterman at Rockedge of Naples,LLC Environmental Supplement Revised November 8,2015 1.0 INTRODUCTION The Watermen at Rockedge Naples, LLC (Rockedge)project site is approximately 106.44 acres located in western Collier County, east of Collier Blvd(C.R. 951) on the north side of Sabal Palm Road. The project boundary is located within Section 23, Township 50 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. The project encompasses sever folio numbers: 00433880004, 004330120007, 00435400000, 00436520002, 00436360000, 00433480006, 00436600003, 00436760008, 00436440001, 00433160009, 00433800000, 00436800104, 00436800201, 00436800308, 00434840001, and 00433040006. Access to the project is via Sabal Palm Road along the southern boundary of the property. A general location map is provided in the included exhibits. The proposed project is located on undeveloped land, with multifamily developments in the vicinity to the north,west and south. Small single family homes and nurseries are located in the area directly adjacent to the project site,with open undeveloped land to the east. The entire project area is approximately 106.44 acres and consists primarily of undeveloped, forested land,with the exception of a small disturbed area with an historic house, and a disturbed area near the south end of the property. The majority of the site has been infested to varying degrees by java plum,melaleuca and Brazilian Pepper. The property contains about 53.82 acres of upland habitats (50.6%of the entire project area) and 51.40 acres of wetland habitats and 1.22 other surface waters (OSW) (49.4%of the entire project area). Approximately 81.81 acres meets Collier County's definition of native habitat. This document provides information concerning the proposed Rockedge project site as it relates to natural resources and environmental issues. It is submitted to South Florida Water Management District in support of an Environmental Resource Permit request made by the applicant. 1 Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 2.0 EXISTING CONDITIONS(Pre-Development) 2 2.1 VEGETATION ASSOCIATIONS 2 2.2 WETLANDS&OTHER SURFACE WATERS 11 2.3 LISTED PLANT&ANIMAL SPECIES 12 2.4 HISTORICAL/ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 13 2.5 SOILS 13 3.0 PROPOSED CONDITIONS (Post-Development) 19 3.1 PROPOSED PROJECT 19 3.2 PROJECT IMPACTS TO WETLANDS 20 3.3 PROJECT IMPACTS TO LISTED SPECIES 21 3.4 PROJECT IMPACTS TO ARCHAEOLOGICAL/HISTORICAL RESOURCES 23 4.0 QUALIFICATIONS 24 EDUCATION 24 ORGANIZATIONS 24 ECOLOGICAL&BIOLOGICAL EXPERIENCE 25 Environmental Supplement WATERMEN AT ROCKEDGE NAPLES, LLC REVISED NOVEMBER 8, 2015 Prepared by: TURRELL,HALL&ASSOCIATES,INC 3584 EXCHANGE AVENUE NAPLES,FL 34104 ROCKEDGE a CR896 y. CR72 �•• CR1372 CR875 �1: eee•* •• ea:ce °e°°•••••••� V.°e *,0.•• • �: i-I •••.e44"i s • i Ie +' �' • • . CR897 V • c e C ,• •O• P CR898 rt • � _ • w J . //I ,,, , _. .,,.,. CR874 , '- 4:::':' co FW.: a V .o•;•• CR1371 :i j /' ' : •••>'.• ,,,i: SABAL PALM ROAD PREC �O ARY . 0 .. x .. .. .c .. l..i.'4..' '3 .. t xtAps<a h CR874— CR726 LEGEND CR875 CR873 NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE PRESERVED CR896 —TO BE PRESERVED CR1372 CR897 CR898 .•vav•• :•••�••••••! ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE CR1371—DESIGNATED FOR PHASE 3 MITIGATION \:.•....! / W DATE: SALE'10/15 CLIENT: WATERMEN AT ROCKEDGE NAPLES, LLC 1" = 500' DRAWN Bv. TITLE: ENGINEERING MDA , 6610 Willow Park Drive,Suite 200 I Naples,Florida 34109 DESIGNED BY, ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITE LOCATIONS (239)597-0575 FAX:(239)597-0578 BCB www.consult-rwa.com SEC TWP, RGE: PROJECT SHEET FILE Florida Certificates of Authorization EB 7663 LB 6952 23 SOS 26E NUMBER: 120030.00.04 NUMBER: 1 OF 1 I NUMBER: A • \ A October 3020158.27 AM K1101211 10030.00.04 Rot kedoe SPUD-_oninit&ERP10011 ERP Penni!Avolicatton Pre.\ERPPIans\MISCSI2W300004-ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES Awe I. Z 0 OQZ 3 w�a oo _ 8 l0/1 H l.1 V S 0QO a S O Z r c Z $ o : U OW Q m K k-vii r a W z =vz> w og zI-L) i i , t.w U V V 6I' a 3 w Y Q z 0 00 — — — — — — — v O ;1. ;:r O C Q W J e LL Q Q c ,— s 1.— O o�g 6 H 0 R r'' l_7 ww o>Z 0 \ �3 o u 4 . LU L/) ® > a' ' _ J Z oo M e a v g odoV CL I H a �z LL �E z i Y Q 3 • m o W Q ON _ ____ ——_I Z V f a 1 T b F V 3 S 3 a ) g i O { w DEVIATION JUSTIFICATIONS Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development Typically projects of 15 acres or more will abut major roadways and are not subject to numerous right-of-way easements that serve very limited number of households. The unique land assemblage and PUD configuration has resulted in a situation where this PUD does abut three "limited service" rights-of way. Where abutting major roadways, 20'Type D Buffers are provide; however, the same buffer width is not warranted where abutting road rights-of way that essentially act as private access drives. It should be noted that this deviation will require the same amount of plantings as a 20' wide buffer, but within a narrower buffer strip. Lastly, the requested 15'buffer width will be consistent with the rest of the buffers for this project. 10-8-2015 Page 5 of 5 DEVIATION JUSTIFICATIONS Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07.H.3.a., which requires a minimum 25' preserve setback for all principal structures to allow a 12.5' side yard setback from preserves for principal structures where identified on the RPUD Master Plan. The reduced setback is allowed in combination with a structural buffer as allowed by the SFWMD. Preserve setbacks are required to provide access to and around the preserve, to limit human encroachment into the preserve and to allow for maintenance of the abutting residential structures. Reducing the required setback for 3 specific locations identified on the Master Plan where a sideyard abuts a preserve will not adversely affect the preserve or the intent behind the preserve setback. It will not impede access, encourage human encroachment or reduce the ability to conduct maintenance. The reduced setback would be allowed in combination with a structural buffer as allowed by the SFWMD and consistent with LDC Section 3.05.07.F.3.(I), which allows buffers adjacent to wetlands in the RFMU district to be reduced by 50% if a structural buffer is provided. This buffer can be in the form of a stem-wall, berm, or vegetative hedge with suitable fencing. Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4, which requires a 20' Type D buffer along perimeter boundaries abutting a right-of-way for all developments of 15 acres or more, to a allow a 15' Type D buffer adjacent to right-of-ways where identified on the RPUD Master Plan. The Type D Buffer is specific to project boundaries abutting right-of-ways and requires varying buffer widths depending on the ultimate width of the abutting right of way. LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4: "Where the ultimate width of the right-of-way is zero to 99 feet, the corresponding landscape buffer shall measure at least ten feet in width. Where the ultimate width of the right-of-way is 100 or more feet, the corresponding landscape buffer shall measure at least 15 feet in width. Developments of 15 acres or more and developments within an activity center shall provide a perimeter landscape buffer of at least 20 feet in width regardless of the width of the right-of-way." The buffer widths acknowledge the varying degree of intensity associated with different roadways. It is generally accepted that major roadways that will have greater noise, lighting, and general traffic impacts than a narrower local roads, and therefore require wider buffers. If not for the fact that this project is greater than 15 acres, the buffer requirements for the areas subject to this deviation would be for a 10' buffer since all three areas abut right-of-way easements less than 99 feet. Moreover, two of the roadways (John's Road and Melrose Lane) act as private driveways to a single family residence. The third location abuts Amity Road, which acts an access drive to a few existing homes. It should also be noted that all three roadway easements do not have the potential to be expanded into major roadways and will only accommodate local traffic into the future. 10-8-2015 Page 4 of 5 DEVIATION JUSTIFICATIONS Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development Deviation # 6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.04.D.1, which prohibits doors and windows on the zero lot line portion of a dwelling unit, to allow windows. This deviation is requested to alleviate an oversight in the LDC which prohibits doors and windows on the zero lot line portion of a dwelling unit. While it is understandable that no doors should be allowed on the zero lot line side, a minimum 10'separation is require for zero lot line units which provides adequate separation between units. Moreover, this minimum separation is the same as what is required for detached single family homes in this PUD. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J which requires cul-de-sac lengths not to exceed 1,000 feet, to allow ±2,500 for the one dead-end street identified on the RPUD Master Plan This deviation is requested to allow a functional subdivision design because of the unique configuration of this PUD. Due to the unique land assemblage and project configuration, the portion of the PUD located along CR 951 does not allow for a looped road or interconnection to other portions of the PUD. A street layout that would avoid a cul-de-sac is not feasible given the narrow depth of the tract along CR 951, the inability to connect back to Sabal Palm Road or other portions of the project, and the impracticality of connecting to CR 951. However, the cul- de sac is designed with a hammerhead at its terminus in order to allow a potential future interconnection with the adjacent property that could provide secondary access onto Sabal Palm Road. The hammerhead is compliant with LDC requirements and design criteria from the Fire District. This deviation has been granted for subdivisions throughout the County, and does not compromise health, safety, and welfare issues related to civil engineering design. Deviation #8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.3.e which limits temporary use permits for model homes to 3 years, to allow a temporary use permit of 5 years without the need to request approval of a Conditional Use petition. This deviation is requested to allow temporary permits for model homes to be a duration of 5 years which is consistent with the projected buildout of this community as outlined in the TIS. It is reasonable and appropriate to have model homes available to tour during the entire sales and buildout period. The models will be clustered in one area and separated from occupied homes as much a practicable in order to minimize any potential or perceived impact to future residents. The LDC already allows this use on a temporary basis, provides a standard time limitation that applies to all developments and requires a Conditional Use to determine if the extended period is adequate. The Conditional Use process is redundant and not required in this case since the PUD process provides oversight and the ability to determine the project's buildout period. 10-8-2015 Page 3 of 5 DEVIATION JUSTIFICATIONS Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development Due to the property's location on a busy arterial road, distance from the travel lanes, and the high travel speeds along the roadway, the Applicant is seeking an increase to the allowable banner size to ensure visibility of this new community during peak sales season. The requested banner size is in accordance with deviations approved for similar residential projects throughout the County. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5, which requires on-premise directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10' from edge of roadway, to allow a setback of 5' edge of roadway/drive aisle. This deviation will provide locational flexibility for directional signage internal to the RPUD. A unified design theme will be utilized for all signage throughout the community, thereby ensuring a cohesive appearance and increased aesthetic appeal. All directional signage will meet the Clear Sight Distance requirements in accordance with LDC Section 60.06.05. Furthermore, this deviation is typical of many of the master planned developments throughout Collier County. Deviation #5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.14, which allows one (1) boundary marker sign or monument structure at each property corner with a sign face no more than 24 square feet, to allow the option of one (1) monument sign along C.R. 951 with a sign face of 64 square feet,rather the tow(2)boundary markers that would be allowed per code. This deviation is requested since the project's access point is along Sabal Road and does not have an access point along C.R. 951. The entrance ground signs, which typically provide a project's highest visibility, will be tucked away down Sabal Road which is a two-lane local roadway. For this project, the one larger monument sign, rather than the two boundary markers allowed per code would act similarly to entrance signs by providing visibility along C.R. 951 and alerting motorists to this project's location. As such, this request asks for option of providing one monument structure sign along C.R. 951 with a sign face of 64 sf., as allowed for entrance signs, rather than the 2 boundary markers with a sign face of 24 sl as would be allowed by code. It should be noted that the LDC currently allows for boundary markers or monument structures, which is consistent with our deviation. The project's unique set of circumstances with its entrance tucked away down Sabal Road, and the high-volume and high- speed nature of C.R. 951, warrants this deviation which will improve the project's visibility and improve safety conditions. Given the wide C.R. 951 right of way, the multi-use path and the significant drainage canal, the one larger sign will be located a considerable distance from travel lanes, which warrants a larger sign face to enhance visibility. Lastly, the larger sign will be consistent with the project's unified design and branding approach. 10-8-2015 Page 2 of 5 DEVIATION JUSTIFICATIONS Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development LIST OF REQUESTED DEVIATIONS Deviation #1 seeks relief from LDC, Section 6.06.01.N which requires minimum local street right-of-way width of 60 feet, to allow a 50' right-of-way width for the internal streets that include public utilities. Minimum right-of-way width of 50 feet is requested for local streets within the Rockedge RPUD. This deviation is justified because this will be a private gated community with controlled access, low traffic volumes and a low posted speed limit. A 50 foot right-of-way for a residential street can successfully facilitate movement of the vehicular, pedestrian and bike traffic while accommodating all utility and drainage needs. In addition, a 10'PUE will be provided on each side of the right of way to accommodate "dry utilities." The 50 foot right-of-way results in a more compact roadway cross-section which accomplishes traffic calming to provide a safer transportation system within the community. This deviation is commonly approved and has been effectively implemented in numerous residential PUDs throughout the County and will not affect public health and safety. Deviation#2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, which permits a maximum wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts, to allow a maximum wall height of 8' along the perimeter of the project and where abutting an existing public roadway, and allow a 12' tall wall/berm combination. The proposed deviation will allow for additional visual screening from adjacent properties and noise attenuation from the significant traffic along C.R. 951. Approval of this deviation will serve to promote public health, safety and welfare, as well as enhance the aesthetic appeal of the proposed community and general area. This deviation is commonly approved and has been effectively implemented in numerous residential PUDs throughout the County. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height, to allow a temporary banner sign, along C.R. 951, up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area. The temporary banner sign shall be limited to a maximum of 90 days per calendar year during season defined as January 1 to March 31. This deviation will remain in force until the project is sold out. The proposed deviation will allow for a banner sign along C.R. 951 in order to advertise new homes available within the community. The 4 square foot banner sign permitted by the LDC provides minimal visibility and likely will not be seen by motorists travelling along C.R. 951 due to the relatively high travel speeds along that corridor and the significant distance from the travel lanes to the project boundary. Additionally, the applicant is requesting that the banner be allowed for up to 90 days per calendar year to allow display throughout the peak winter season for home sales. This deviation would remain in force until the project is sold out. 10-8-2015 Page 1 of 5 EXHIBIT F Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development D. The site plan shows archaeological areas within the preserves labeled"to be preserved"or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation"on the Archaeological Site Locations Mapetained. No storage of fill,equipment or supplies shall be placed within the native vegetation preserve areas (which include the archaeological preserves). in the archaeological areas within the native vegetation preserve. E. Should any replanting or landscaping be permitted or required within the archaeological preserves labeled"to be preserved"or"designated for Phase 3 mitigation"on the Archaeological Site Locations Map, such activity shall be coordinated with and monitored by an archaeologist. F. If any archaeological features or artifacts are discovered during construction or development activities on the parcelin the Rockedge RPUD,all development and construction activities shall cease at that location until the site has been examined by an archaeologist and necessary efforts to protect and/or document such resources have been implemented. G. If additional human remains are discovered within the Rockedge RPUD, then the provisions of Florida Statutes Section 872.05—laws governing the treatment of unmarked human burials—shall apply. Page 16 of 16 10 g 2015 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT F Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development ENVIRONMENTAL: A. Project has 81.81 acres of native vegetation. 3.36 acres of non-native area have been included in the native vegetation preserve requirements due to a past clearing violation by previous owners. Native vegetation requirement is based on the 81.81 acres plus the 3.36 acres or 85.17 acres total. 25% of 85.17 results in a preserve requirement of 21.29 acres. The project is preserving 24.2 acres which is more than required. A. Per LDC Section 3.05.07 Preservation Standards, 25% of the subject property's 81.35 acres of existing native vegetation, or 20.31 L acres, must be preserved on site. As- generally depicted on Exhibit C: RPUD Master Plan, 21.20 :.t.: acres of preserve will be provi-ed- ARCHAEOLOGICAL: In 2014, a Phase I cultural resource assessment of the site was conducted by Robert S. Carr, M.S., of the Archeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. This assessment(A Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment of the Rockedge Parcel,AHC Technical Report#1024) is a revised and expanded phase of work that follows a 2003 assessment of a portion of the Rockedge parcel. Seven previously recorded sites (CR726, CR873, CR874, CR875, CR896, CR897, CR898) and two previously unrecorded sites (CR1371, CR1372)were documented. Based on the discovery of CR1371, a small black earth midden, a Phase II assessment was completed and the report(A Phase II Cultural Resource Assessment of Rockedge#2, Site 8CR1371,AHC Technical Report #1044). Letters concurring with the findings, results, and recommendations (including Phase III mitigation) of the two reports were received on 12/31/15 and 3/04/15 respectively. In accordance with the Phase 1 assessment: Further, the following additional recommendations contained in the Phase 1 cultural resource A. Prior to any clearing or grubbing activities within 100 feet of the archaeological preserves labeled"to be preserved"or"designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map,a temporary construction fence shall be placed around the preserve areas. B. Any clearing of exotic vegetation within the archaeological preserve labeled"to be preserved"or"designated for Phase 3 mitigation"on the Archaeological Site Locations Map s shall be conducted by hand. No mechanical equipment shall be used within the archaeological preserves for clearing or debris removal. C. All activities of clearing, grubbing, and subsurface alterations such as digging for utilities ditches,water management lakes,roads and the like that are located within 90 feet of the archaeological preserves labeled"to be preserved"or"designated for Phase 3 mitigation"on the Archaeological Site Locations Map and archaeological sites labeled "not eligible to be preserved"on the Archaeological Site Locations Map shall be subject to archaeological monitoring. Page 15 of 16 10 S 2015 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT F Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS PUD MonitoringMONITORING: One entity(hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Watermen at Rockedge Naples, LLC or its assigns. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity,then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. Commencing with submittal of the first development order that utilizes TDR credits, a TDR calculation sheet shall be submitted documenting that the owner has acquired all TDR. credits needed for that portion of the development. The calculation sheet tracks the chronological. assignment of TDR credits with respect to all subsequent development orders until the maximum density allowed by the utilization of TDR credits has been reached (all TDR credits allowing residential development reach a zero balance). TRANSPORTATION: A. At the request of Collier County, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) bus stop with shelter will be installed by the developer at no cost to the County.The exact location will be determined during site development plan review;however,every effort shall be made for co-utilization of the CAT stop for a school bus pick-up and drop-off. This shall be coordinated with the Collier County School District. If co-utilization is determined not to be feasible, then a site for school bus drop-off and pick-up shall be provided internal to the site. B. The de loperowner,and its successors or assigns will be responsible a proportionate share of signalization and intersection improvements at Sabal Palm Road and Collier Boulevard (CR 951), when warranted. C. The Rockedge PUD TlSTransportation Impact Study was based on a development scenario of 266 single-family detached units. The total trip generation was estimated in the'ISIS to be 253 PM peak hour two-way external trips based on 1TE trip generation rates. The development scenario of 266 single-family detached units may change. However, the Project's estimated trip generation will not exceed a maximum of 253 PM peak hour two- way external trips. Page 14 of 16 10 8 2015 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT E Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development Deviation #10 seeks relief from Section III, Exhibit "A", Design Requirements of Subdivisions C.13.j. of the Administrative Code for Collier County Construction Standards Manual adopted curves on all streets, in order to allow no tangents in order to provide • . . flexib ity Deviation #11 seeks relief from Section 22 112(1)(a) of the Collier County Code of Laws and line or easement line of any existing or proposed,private or public street,road,highway,or access easement, to allow excavations to be located a minimum of 30' feet from the right of way line or easement. Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4, which requires a 20' Type 11) buffer along perimeter boundaries abutting a right-of-way for all developments of 15 acres or more, to a allow a 15' Type D buffer adjacent to right-of-ways where identified on the RPUD Master Plan Page 13 of 16 10 g 2015 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT E Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development LIST OF DEVIATIONS Deviation#1 seeks relief from LDC,Section 6.06.01.N which requires minimum local street right- of-way width of 60 feet, to allow a 50' right-of-way width for the private internal streets that include public utilities. Deviation#2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C,which permits a maximum wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts, to allow a maximum wall height of 8' along the perimeter of the project, and allow a 12' tall wall/berm combination where abutting an existing public roadway. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height, to allow a temporary banner sign up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area. The temporary banner sign shall be limited to maximum of 90 days per calendar ear during season defined as November 1 to April 30 per calendar year. This deviation will remain in force until the project is sold out. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5, which requires on-premises directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10' from edge of roadway,to allow a setback of 5' from the edge of a private roadway/drive aisle. Deviation#5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06,02.13.14,which allows one(1)boundary marker sign or monument structure at each property corner with a sign face no more than 24 square feet; to allow the option of one(1)monument sign along C.R. 951 with a sign face of 64 square feet,rather the two(2) boundary markers that would be allowed per code. Deviation#5 seeks relief from I.,DC Section 5.06.02.13.11,which allows one(1)boundary marker to allow the boundary marker signs along C.R. 951 to have a sign face of 61 square feet. Deviation#6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.04.D.1,which prohibits doors and windows on the zero lot line portion of a dwelling unit, to allow windows. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.J which requires cul-de-sac lengths not to exceed 1,000 feet, to allow 2,500 feet for the one cul-de-sac dead end street identified on the RPUD Master Plan Deviation#8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.3.e which limits temporary use permits for model homes to 3 years, to allow a temporary use permit of 5 years without the need to request approval of a Conditional Use petition. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07.H.3.a., which requires a minimum 25' preserve setback for all principal structures to allow a 12.5' side yard setback from wetland preserves for principal structures where identified on the RPUD Master Plan. The reduced setback is allowed in combination with a structural buffer as allowed by the SFWMD. Page 12 of 16 10 8 2015 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT D Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development THENCE N89°47'35"W ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 230.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 100 FEET EAST OF (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR) AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE NOO°51'53"E ON SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1642.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/2)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°22'01"E FOR 894.88 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N00°58'45"E FOR 662.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST (NE-1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 996.40 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF(E-1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S01°05'30"W ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 328.19 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 328.19 FEET SOUTH OF (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR)AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N89°01'53"E ON SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 663.85 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (E-1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°10'38"E ON SAID EAST LINE FOR 328.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS THAT PART OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 321, PAGE 259, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL CONTAINS 106.44 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. BEARINGS HEREINABOVE MENTIONED ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST TO BEAR NORTH 89°01'58" EAST. Page 11 of 16 10 b 2015 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT D Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 4. S89°47'35"E FOR 30.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND RECORDED IN IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4466, PAGE 3476, SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL: 1. N01°01'01"E FOR 218.98 FEET; 2. N52°35'40"E FOR 646.23 FEET; 3. N40°29'08"W FOR 30.05 FEET; 4. N49°40'54"E FOR 22.10 FEET; 5. THENCE N36°22'15"E FOR 436.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°42'08"W ON SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 785.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°01'01"E FOR 332.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°32'04"W FOR 994.18 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°42'08"E FOR 331.15 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°56'29"W FOR 660.13 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°57'42"W FOR 330.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; Page 10 of 16 10 18 2015 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT D Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development REVISED LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 664.25 FEET ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF TRACT "F1" OF THE PLAT OF ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55, PAGE 1, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S01°14'38"W FOR 675.75 FEET ON SAID WEST LINE OF TRACT "F1" TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT"F1"; THENCE S01°14'14"W ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 675.73 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S89°42'08"W ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 662.30 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4466, PAGE 3476, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE EAST AND SOUTH LINES OF SAID PARCEL: 1. S01°09'56"W FOR 617.91 FEET; 2. N89°34'54"W FOR 300.19 FEET; 3. S01°09'09"W FOR 435.95 FEET; 4. N89°34'09"W FOR 150.16 FEET; 5. N89°38'05"W FOR 210.56 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (E-1/2)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE NO 1°05'19"E ON SAID WEST LINE FOR 43.72 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF(S-1/2)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°48'02"W ON SAID NORTH LINE FOR 15.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4970, PAGE 3362, SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FOUR BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE SOUTH,WEST AND NORTH LINES OF SAID PARCEL 1: 1. S01°05'19"W ON SAID EAST LINE FOR 303.80 FEET; 2. N89°37'28"W FOR 645.47 FEET; 3. N01°01'07"E FOR 302.01 FEET Page 9 of 16 10 8 2015 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT C _ REGIONAL ROCKEDGE _ ZONING:PUD, RPM MASTER PLAN CURORENT LAND USE SINGLE FAMILY CURRENT LAND USE:PRESERVE RESIDENTIAL SUB-DIVISION {I ems. —,— ,----s. .'! ---• _--_ _.- C�)_.. r30'ROADWAY W W W m W W 15'TYPE EASEMENT O.R.635 W W W W W W L S' ' 15' I R B'" BUFFER PG.1273 W W 'D`BUFFER ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE I / _.= LAND USE:SINGLE } W W W. W . W W W W , FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WY WW W W W W I ; R p W . W * W W _ 11 I +• J W W W .P W .. W W WI ZONING:MPUD. I 1I 1 R 15'TYPE C� . .. . . W W W W W W W W W W W W W WI HRR NT LA DUS 1 J CURRENT LAND USE: EASEM I l —3•BUFFER W W W . W W W SINGLE FAMILY O.R.34 _ ---- ` W W W W W W SUBDIVISION 'PG \� �� W W �W W W W W W W PG.1D0 9,1 I ., W W W W PROPERTY ' PG 584 I I — l?��W W W .44 W J P W W /BOUNDARY„At II I 1 TO BE II — I W WWWWW ZONINO:A- IVACATE[1 I I I Iy W W JO1 W W W AGRICULTURE I III 1 20, I�1 I W WWWWW ∎'*W W W W W W CURRENT LAND I LME I $ W W W W W .I USE:FAMILY j ad� W W W W W W `+ RESIDENTIAL IWW J W . f W 0 r ` ���� �. 1 Y W W W W Y W W W W W W W W W W W W W 1 WpW =I I W * W * W W W A-AGRICULTURE w R 1I L U JW W W y I CURRENT LAND USE: w' E — _ �W�� y . W W W W W W W W W ° WWWW a VACANT LAND T. [ 15'TYPE — — 15'TYPE Z -B'BUFFER 'B”BUFFER 1i�• W IIW ∎; EXHIBIT C ROCKEDGE ' LEGEND ZONIN :TTRVC RPITD MASTER PLAN f R RESIDENTIAL CURRENT LAND USE:RV PARK RECREATIONAL - RA AREA 7OR1 S ROAD ��;;� P PRESERVE PROPERTY - r TRAFFIC FLOW BOUNDARY �\ I 1I PATTERN 15'TYPE ` I 'l I I ® DEVIATIONS ZONING: "B"BUFF---4 I I I WATER mi A-AGRICULTURAL !.' '' ,I I Lea. MANAGEMENT LAKE (SCATTERED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) i I ARCHAEOLOGICAL I I AREA 20'AMITY RD ESMT.& --5'DRAINAGE SWALE ESMT. I I .. PRESERVE MAINIAGREEMENT &MAINL AGREEMENT OR I J I I BOUNDARY OR 2826 PG.2485 2826 PG.2485 J/ I ❑ 1 ` MARKER '� I " (J 15'TYPE R ! I N ,DSBUF� "D•BUFFER p LAND USE SUMMARY 1 = _ _ —i w TRACT LAND USE ACREAGE "15'BUFFER RA N TRACT"R^ RESIDENTIAL 58.43+/-AC G R w TRACT"F"' PRESERVE 24.20+1-AC II 7 i —` TRACT"RA"RECREM 1ON AREA 0.91+1-AC Lai F Z TRACT "L" LAKEAVATERMANAGEMENT 1028+/-AC ZONNG:A-AGRICULTURE ACCESS DRIVEJRO.w. 12.64+1 AC IJ ' J CURRENT LAND USE:SINGLE FAMILY r TOTAL 108.44+/-AC >2 20'TYPE RESIDENTUU..,VACANT LAND I J g I "D'BUFFER to MAXIMUM DENSITY I� --------15'TYPE PROPERTY BOUNDARY,-_ lg .. I "B"BUFFER + 288 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS g R 160 DWELLING UNITS DERIVED FROM 15'TYPE BASE J ' DENSITY;108 FROM TDR'S _ R��B"BUFFER V 1 !!!!!! (RPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES i �Il3l I 170'FPL PROPERTY EASEMENT 1.WITHIN THE RPUD BOUNDARIES THERE WILL BE �^- _ /BOUNDARY OR 67% A MINIMUM OF 60%OPEN SPACE. R. (fl PG.1765 ZONING:A- 2.THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN AGRICULTURE ON THIS PUD MASTER PLAN SHALL BE I 2M II, SINGLE L CURRENT LAND USE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. E RESIDENTIAL,VACANT i 3.THE DESIGN,LOCATION,AND CONFIGURATION • _._, LAND 1 OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE I DEFINED AT EITHER PRELIMINARY 10 TYPE 15'TYPE SUBDIVISION PLAT APPROVAL,OR 'A•BUFFER "B"BUFFER w _5'TYPE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL. POTENTIAL FUTURE -D^BUFFER 4.REQUIRED PRESERVE 21.28 AC(25%OF 85.17 INTERCONNECT 2 ! AC OF EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION. a PRESERVE PROVIDED:2420 AC I ZONING:A- y AGRICULTURAL O 5. BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION(S)TO tCURRENT LAND USE: THE MULTWSE PATH ALONG COLLIER 10'TYPE \ NURSERY AY RAN I BOULEVARD "A"BUFFER O.R.371 MAY BE PROVIDED AT TIME OF PPL OR SDP. PG.259 PROPERTY \PROPERTY BOUNDARY EASEMENT 8. MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFERING To BOUNDARY ZONING:A-AGRICULTURAL/MELROSE ROW -M- I1 REQUIREMENTS MAYBE MET WITH EXISTING CURRENT LAND USE:NURSERY L PRESERVE.WHERE THE PRESERVE DOES NOT SAaAI.PAILf ROAD MEET THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ZONING:PUD,WINDING CYPRESS ; REQUIREMENTS,PLANTING TO MEET THESE CURRENT LAND USE:RESIDENTIAL,VERONA "D REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE REQUIRED. . 4/ � R��s"r 3x•u„ ♦. • .:� WATERMEN AT ROCKEDGE ROCKFDGE R�l�'°°n` :R,m�a 9 NAPLES,1.I.0 RPUD wm _i :c9A"oepee". 2 PtNLNO tt44 COUNTT:ONUIENTS `PC N w INOV35 ENGENEEEING ,05R N.[ ."'O'/OY35 w-l'-300'I.:.''' N.A 23 505 '& I PER 1sT RCUVOC COMMENTS >x w 117.95/15 ®t. MASTER PLAN t V.V. o..xv c•a•. w '` fN i>s"r. IPC •• •:120030.0004,.••ei RPM RAN 71 I,2015 ••7;7 , rrxua ma eliN7..M.01.1.01.+.M-a,ae Irw 04M...M.....I.M..ux.fa,-Y Page 7 of 16 3 20 2014 11-17-201c Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT B Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 3. For corner lots, only 1 front yard setback shall be required. The yard that does not contain the driveway shall provide a minimum 10'setback. 4. The minimum distance between buildings may be reduced to 0'where attached garages are provided.However,the principal structures shall maintain a 10'minimum separation. 5. Accessory pool cage setbacks may be reduced to 0 feet when attached to a common privacy wall. 6. If single family development is pursued through the County's plat process,LMEs and LBEs will be platted as separate tracts. 7. When a lot abuts a lake maintenance easement(LME)or-perimeteflandscape buffer easement(LBE),the minimum rear yard shall be measured from the easement. .Otherwise,the minimum rear yard shall be measured from the parcel boundaries. 7,8. In order to support a canopy tree with a minimum 20-foot crown spread as required in LDC Section 4.06.05, individual lots must accommodate enough space for the entire 20-foot canopy to be located wholly within the lot boundaries,except where the lot is adjacent to a lake maintenance easement and/or;landscape buffer easement,in which case,a portion of the required 20-foot canopy may protrude into such area.Applies to all residential lots within the PUD. Page 6 of 16 3 20 2015 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT B Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development DEVELOPMENT SINGLE SINGLE DUPLEX& TOWNHOUSES MULTI- RECREATION STANDARDS FAMILY FAMILY TWO- FAMILY DETACHED$ ATTACHED& FAMILY$ SINGLE FAMILY ZERO LOT LINES PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA 4,000 S.F. 3,500 S.F. 3,500 S.F. 1,600 S.F. PER N/A N/A PER UNIT UNIT MIN. LOT WIDTH 1 40 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 16 FEET N/A N/A MIN. FRONT YARD 2,3 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET MIN.SIDE YARD 5 FEET 0 OR10 FEET 0 AND 5 FEET 0 AND 5 FEET 10 FEET 1/2 BH MIN.REAR YARD 67 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MIN. PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET MIN.DISTANCE BETWEEN 10 FEET 10 FEET 0 OR 10 FEET 0 OR 10 FEET 20 FEET 1/2 sum of the BH STRUCTURES' MAX. ZONED BUILDING 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 45 FEET 35 FEET HEIGHT 55 FEET MAX.ACTUAL BUILDING 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET HEIGHT over te-afking ACCESSORY STRUCTURES MIN.FRONT YARD SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS MIN.SIDE YARD SPS SPS SPS5 SPS5 SPS SPS MIN. REAR YARD sa 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 0 FEET MIN. PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MAX.ZONED BUILDING 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET HEIGHT MAX.ACTUAL BUILDING 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET HEIGHT BH: Building Height(zoned height) SPS:Same as Principal Structure 1. The minimum lot width may be reduced by 205%,provided the minimum lot area requirement shall be maintained. 2. For multi-family product the Ffront yard setbacks shall be measured from back of curb,or edge of pavement if not curbed_; for private roads. For all other unit types,front yard setbacks shall be measured from ROW line. The minimum 15'front yard setback may be reduced to 10'where the unit has a recessed or side-entry garage. Front-loading garages shall be set back a minimum of 23 feet from edge of sidewalk. Page 5 of 16 3 20 2015 1]-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT B Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for the RPUD Residential Subdistrict and Recreation Area Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the site development plan (SDP) or subdivision plat. 1. Guardhouses, gatehouses, access control structures, clock towers, fences, walls, columns, entrance features are permitted within the "R" designated area abutting the project's • no required setbacks; however, such structures cannot be located where they create vehicular stacking or sight distance issues for motorists and pedestrians,and cannot exceed 35' in actual height. Page 4 of 16 3 20 2015 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT A Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 2. Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis and basketball courts, playgrounds, pedestrian/bicycle pathways, and water features. 3. Passive open space uses and structures, such as but not limited to landscaped areas, gazebos, park benches and walking trails. 4. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA")or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Community maintenance areas, and maintenance structures. 2. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. Win PRESERVE AREA A. Permitted Uses: 1. Native preserves 2. Uses and structures that will not reduce the native preservation requirements, such as boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos, benches and viewing platforms, subject to approval by the permitting agencies and in accordance with the LDC.:;ubject to approval by permitting agencies and the Collier County LDC. 3. Drainage and water management structures that will not reduce the native preservation requirement„ including but not limited to walls and berms. 4. Any other conservation use or structure which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses,within a preserve, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. 4:5. Activities in the archaeological areas within the Preserve shall be in accordance with Exhibit F and the I..DC. Page 3 of 16 3 20 2015,.11.17-?Q.15. Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT A Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 5. Multi-family 6. Temporary model homes 7. Model sales center 8. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to swimming pools, spas, screen enclosures, private garages, and other recreational facilities. 2. Gatehouses and other access control structures. 3. Utility and water management facilities 4. Walls, berms, and signs. 5. Project sales, construction and administrative offices that may occur in residential and/or temporary structures. 6. Passive open space uses and structures, such as but not limited to landscaped areas, gazebos,park benches and walking trails. 7. Storage areas, for the exclusive use of the residents. 8. Community maintenance areas, and maintenance structures. 9. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA")or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. III. RECREATION AREA A. Principal Uses: 1. Structures intended to provide social and recreational space for the private use of the residents and their guests. Page 2 of 16 3 20 201511-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT A Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development Regulations for development of the Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Ordinance and applicable sections of the Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of Site Development Plan or Subdivision Platany development order to which said regulations relate. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards,then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. MAXIMUM DENSITY: There shall be no more than 2667 residential dwelling units permitted on the ± 106.67 14 gross acres, resulting in a maximum density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre. This PUD allows a base density of 1.5 units per acre or 160 dwelling units, and pursuant to the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict provisions of the Growth Management Plan, an additional 1067 units are derived from Transfer of Development Rights (TDR). Redemption of TDR credits shall be per LDC Section 2.03.07.D.4(g). PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: I. GENERAL PERMITTED USES Guardhouses, gatehouses, access control structures, clock towers, fences, walls, columns, decorative hardscaping or architectural embellishments associated with the project's entrance features are permitted within the "R" designated area abutting the project's entrance,or within the private roadway as depicted on the PUD Master Plan,and shall have no required setbacks; however, such structures cannot be located where they create vehicular stacking or sight distance issues for motorists and pedestrians,and cannot exceed 35' in actual height. II. RESIDENTIAL A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family, detached 2. Single family, attached 3. Single family, zero lot line 4. Townhouse Page 1 of 16 3 20 2015..11-1?7015. Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT F Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development E. Should any replanting or landscaping be permitted or required within the archaeological preserves labeled "to be preserved" or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map, such activity shall be coordinated with and monitored by an archaeologist. F. If any archaeological features or artifacts are discovered during construction or development activities in the Rockedge RPUD, all development and construction activities shall cease at that location until the site has been examined by an archaeologist and necessary efforts to protect and/or document such resources have been implemented. G. If additional human remains are discovered within the Rockedge RPUD, then the provisions of Florida Statutes Section 872.05—laws governing the treatment of unmarked human burials—shall apply. Page 14 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT F Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development ENVIRONMENTAL: A. Project has 81.81 acres of native vegetation. 3.36 acres of non-native area have been included in the native vegetation preserve requirements due to a past clearing violation by previous owners. Native vegetation requirement is based on the 81.81 acres plus the 3.36 acres or 85.17 acres total. 25% of 85.17 results in a preserve requirement of 21.29 acres. The project is preserving 24.2 acres which is more than required. ARCHAEOLOGICAL: In 2014, a Phase I cultural resource assessment of the site was conducted by Robert S. Carr, M.S., of the Archeological and Historical Conservancy, Inc. This assessment (A Phase I Cultural Resource Assessment of the Rockedge Parcel, AHC Technical Report #1024) is a revised and expanded phase of work that follows a 2003 assessment of a portion of the Rockedge parcel. Seven previously recorded sites (CR726, CR873, CR874, CR875, CR896, CR897, CR898) and two previously unrecorded sites (CR1371, CR1372) were documented. Based on the discovery of CR1371,a small black earth midden,a Phase II assessment was completed and the report(A Phase II Cultural Resource Assessment of Rockedge#2, Site 8CR1371,AHC Technical Report #1044). Letters concurring with the findings,results,and recommendations(including Phase III mitigation) of the two reports were received on 12/31/15 and 3/04/15 respectively. In accordance with the Phase 1 assessment: A. Prior to any clearing or grubbing activities within 100 feet of the archaeological preserves labeled "to be preserved" or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map, a temporary construction fence shall be placed around the preserve areas. B. Any clearing of exotic vegetation within the archaeological preserve labeled"to be preserved" or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map s shall be conducted by hand. No mechanical equipment shall be used within the archaeological preserves for clearing or debris removal. C. All activities of clearing, grubbing, and subsurface alterations such as digging for utilities ditches, water management lakes, roads and the like that are located within 90 feet of the archaeological preserves labeled"to be preserved" or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map and archaeological sites labeled "not eligible to be preserved" on the Archaeological Site Locations Map shall be subject to archaeological monitoring. D. The site plan shows archaeological areas within the preserves labeled "to be preserved" or "designated for Phase 3 mitigation"on the Archaeological Site Locations Map. No storage of fill, equipment or supplies shall be placed in the archaeological areas within the native vegetation preserve. Page 13 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT F Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS PUD MONITORING: One entity(hereinafter the Managing Entity) shall be responsible for PUD monitoring until close- out of the PUD, and this entity shall also be responsible for satisfying all PUD commitments until close-out of the PUD. At the time of this PUD approval, the Managing Entity is Watermen at Rockedge Naples, LLC or its assigns. Should the Managing Entity desire to transfer the monitoring and commitments to a successor entity,then it must provide a copy of a legally binding document that needs to be approved for legal sufficiency by the County Attorney. After such approval, the Managing Entity will be released of its obligations upon written approval of the transfer by County staff, and the successor entity shall become the Managing Entity. As Owner and Developer sell off tracts, the Managing Entity shall provide written notice to County that includes an acknowledgement of the commitments required by the PUD by the new owner and the new owner's agreement to comply with the Commitments through the Managing Entity, but the Managing Entity shall not be relieved of its responsibility under this Section. When the PUD is closed-out, then the Managing Entity is no longer responsible for the monitoring and fulfillment of PUD commitments. Commencing with submittal of the first development order that utilizes TDR credits, a TDR calculation sheet shall be submitted documenting that the owner has acquired all TDR credits needed for that portion of the development. The calculation sheet tracks the chronological assignment of TDR credits with respect to all subsequent development orders until the maximum density allowed by the utilization of TDR credits has been reached (all TDR credits allowing residential development reach a zero balance). TRANSPORTATION: A. At the request of Collier County, a Collier Area Transit (CAT) bus stop with shelter will be installed by the developer at no cost to the County.The exact location will be determined during site development plan review;however,every effort shall be made for co-utilization of the CAT stop for a school bus pick-up and drop-off. This shall be coordinated with the Collier County School District. If co-utilization is determined not to be feasible, then a site for school bus drop-off and pick-up shall be provided internal to the site. B. The owner, and its successors or assigns will be responsible a proportionate share of signalization and intersection improvements at Sabal Palm Road and Collier Boulevard (CR 951),when warranted. C. The Rockedge PUD Transportation Impact Study was based on a development scenario of 266 single-family detached units. The total trip generation was estimated in the TIS to be 253 PM peak hour two-way external trips based on ITE trip generation rates. The development scenario of 266 single-family detached units may change. However, the Project's estimated trip generation will not exceed a maximum of 253 PM peak hour two- way external trips. Page 12 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT E Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development LIST OF DEVIATIONS Deviation#1 seeks relief from LDC, Section 6.06.01.N which requires minimum local street right- of-way width of 60 feet, to allow a 50' right-of-way width for the private internal streets that include public utilities. Deviation#2 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.03.02.C, which permits a maximum wall height of 6' in residential zoning districts, to allow a maximum wall height of 8' along the perimeter of the project, and allow a 12' tall wall/berm combination where abutting an existing public roadway. Deviation #3 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.06.A.3.e, which allows temporary signs on residentially zoned properties up to 4 square feet in area or 3 feet in height, to allow a temporary banner sign up to a maximum of 32 square feet in area. The temporary banner sign shall be limited to maximum of 90 days per calendar year during season defined as November 1 to April 30. This deviation will remain in force until the project is sold out. Deviation #4 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.5, which requires on-premises directional signs to be setback a minimum of 10' from edge of roadway,to allow a setback of 5' from the edge of a private roadway/drive aisle. Deviation#5 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.06.02.B.14,which allows one(1)boundary marker sign or monument structure at each property corner with a sign face no more than 24 square feet, to allow the option of one(1)monument sign along C.R. 951 with a sign face of 64 square feet,rather the two(2)boundary markers that would be allowed per code. Deviation#6 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.02.04.D.1,which prohibits doors and windows on the zero lot line portion of a dwelling unit, to allow windows. Deviation #7 seeks relief from LDC Section 6.06.01.) which requires cul-de-sac lengths not to exceed 1,000 feet,to allow 2,500 feet for the one cul-de-sac street identified on the RPUD Master Plan Deviation#8 seeks relief from LDC Section 5.04.04.B.3.e which limits temporary use permits for model homes to 3 years, to allow a temporary use permit of 5 years without the need to request approval of a Conditional Use petition. Deviation #9 seeks relief from LDC Section 3.05.07.H.3.a., which requires a minimum 25' preserve setback for all principal structures to allow a 12.5' side yard setback from wetland preserves for principal structures where identified on the RPUD Master Plan. The reduced setback is allowed in combination with a structural buffer as allowed by the SFWMD. Deviation #10 seeks relief from LDC Section 4.06.02.C.4, which requires a 20' Type D buffer along perimeter boundaries abutting a right-of-way for all developments of 15 acres or more, to a allow a 15' Type D buffer adjacent to right-of-ways where identified on the RPUD Master Plan Page 11 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT D Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°22'01"E FOR 894.88 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N00°58'45"E FOR 662.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST (NE-1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 996.40 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF(E-1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S01°05'30"W ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 328.19 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 328.19 FEET SOUTH OF (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR) AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N89°01'53"E ON SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 663.85 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (E-1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°10'38"E ON SAID EAST LINE FOR 328.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS THAT PART OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 321, PAGE 259, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL CONTAINS 106.44 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. BEARINGS HEREINABOVE MENTIONED ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST TO BEAR NORTH 89°01'58" EAST. Page 10 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT D Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL: 1. N01°01'01"E FOR 218.98 FEET; 2. N52°35'40"E FOR 646.23 FEET; 3. N40°29'08"W FOR 30.05 FEET; 4. N49°40'54"E FOR 22.10 FEET; 5. THENCE N36°22'15"E FOR 436.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°42'08"W ON SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 785.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°01'01"E FOR 332.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°32'04"W FOR 994.18 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°42'08"E FOR 331.15 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°56'29"W FOR 660.13 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°57'42"W FOR 330.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°47'35"W ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 230.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 100 FEET EAST OF (AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR)AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N00°51'53"E ON SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1642.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/2)OF Page 9 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT D Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH,RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 664.25 FEET ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF TRACT "Fl" OF THE PLAT OF ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55, PAGE 1, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S01°14'38"W FOR 675.75 FEET ON SAID WEST LINE OF TRACT "F1" TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT"F1"; THENCE S01°14'14"W ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 675.73 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S89°42'08"W ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 662.30 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4466, PAGE 3476, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY,FLORIDA; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE EAST AND SOUTH LINES OF SAID PARCEL: 1. S01°09'56"W FOR 617.91 FEET; 2. N89°34'54"W FOR 300.19 FEET; 3. S01°09'09"W FOR 435.95 FEET; 4. N89°34'09"W FOR 150.16 FEET; 5. N89°38'05"W FOR 210.56 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (E-1/2)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°05'19"E ON SAID WEST LINE FOR 43.72 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF(S-1/2)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°48'02"W ON SAID NORTH LINE FOR 15.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4970, PAGE 3362, SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FOUR BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE SOUTH,WEST AND NORTH LINES OF SAID PARCEL 1: 1. S01°05'19"W ON SAID EAST LINE FOR 303.80 FEET; 2. N89°3728"W FOR 645.47 FEET; 3. N01°01'07"E FOR 302.01 FEET 4. S89°47'35"E FOR 30.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND RECORDED IN IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4466, PAGE 3476, SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; Page 8 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT C ROCKEDGE r— ZONING: MEDICAL CENTERLLD MASTER PLAN CURREINT LAND USE: INGLE FAMILY LY CURRENT LAND USE:PRESERVE RESIDENTIAL SUB-DIVISION .--., —� .4—a _�._. _. .. �cu� ._ 30 ROADWAY 15'TYPE EASEMENT O.R 635 . W I 15'TYPE R "B'BUFFER PG 1273 . W . . . . 'D"BUFFER ■ ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE -= j CURRENT LAND USE:SINGLE O A W 3I4D J W y y . . y` 4 . . . W y. y . FAMILY RESIDENTIAL W W W W W W W ' r R_f l 6E E I R "B'SBUFFER i . Y " P. YW • WI ZONING:MPUD. O W . . ,, . . HACIENDA LAKES .I . . . y . W . . I CURRENT LAND US E : SINGLE FAMILY — . . . SUBDMSIONL I I PG.16322I \\ — — / \ I. . . . . . . . . . 1 0.1t 1119, \\ a . PG.100611 ', �♦� . . . /-PROPERTY O.R.2469, s-...-- _ U r. ti . BOUNDARY PG 581 1 °— '-s w e y f III Il'TOBE I� • ♦'�♦♦ ' y. A, ZONING:A- 1 �V T� ! ,W „ . ,,, , AGRICULTURE• �!1 CURRENT LAND I I I I 2W I ' ♦•o.,W . . . . .. . . 1 LISE:SINGLE FAAIILY —— —_ _ . . . . . . . *1 . . RESIDENTIAL IL. - I wWw .P. WW . w . Ww ° y1 )- R— — / . . . . . ' A-AGRICULTUR E I w J . y . . I CURRENT LAND USE :— . 4 1, y . 4, . VACANT LAND r y y y yyy y N--+�15'TYPE W , . . . . . . r ' nff I . w 'B BUFFER '8"BUFFER i 1 a ° . IL — w I ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE " PROPERTY BOUNDARY CURRENT LAND USE:SINGLE FAMILY // R I RESIDENTIAL,VACANT LAND /// — POTENTIAL FUTURE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN /7——--'--)) INTERCONNECTION z/(/ L: H 20 I �� � LME ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE PROPERTY BOUNDARY- �y �`- CURRENT LAND USE:NURSERY I SINGLE Z / / R - 15'TYPE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL _ "B•BUFFER ' LEGEND ■ t •D"BUFFER: / (�-- - y 1 z \ R RESIDENTIAL I - R 1 15'TYPE RECREATIONAL ' Uf R / `� B"BUFFER -PROPERTY BOUNDARY RA AREA Z_ P PRESERVE // ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE TRAFFIC FLOW t 1 / �— "B'BUFFER CURRENT LAND USE: PATTERN R II+7 } 15'TYPE �5 DEVIATIONS ei ,�f 20J, ��'� PROPERTY BOUNDARY 1 MANAGEMENT LAKE LME I I I ZONING:NA-A AGRICULTURE AREA O 1 VACANT LAND I I �l _,_- 15 TYPE •"• PRESERVE ` � U_ B BUFFER sAau PALM BOUNDARY 20'TYPE __ ■ MARKER 'D"BUFFER • .r �k.o,. ♦.r . is�ii.i® WATEP.MEN AT ROCKEDGE ROCKEDGE. 8351 am0)kosJe NAPLES.LLC RPUD lNGINEUIIIN6 N"""ie11:7∎m"s m"' 2 PS -O 01 0(C1.N5Y(Of COMMENTS :PC W 11/ /15 m OlNryls g41'�300'I N/P 22 505 20E 1 0020*0 POUND COLVTI COMMENTS SPC PJ 01/09/15 MASTER RAN - ,�'" kMW I.• W �'` .011.100" -PPDDPIAN]lI0Y 2015 ' 1',0 2 . �a Arlan. Page 7 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT C ROCKEDGE ' LEGEND ZONING:TTRVC RPUD MASTER PLAN R RESIDENTIAL CURRENT LAND USE:RV PARK RECREATIONAL JOHNS ROAD RA AREA PROPERTY - P PRESERVE BOUNDARY I TRAFFIC FLOW II I PATTERN 15'TYPE I I 5 DEVIATIONS ZONING: "B'BUFFER I ' I I I p WATER A-AGRICULTURAL I � LME L ':I MANAGEMENT LAKE (SCATTERED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) L% 4 xr ARCHAEOLOGICAL AREA r 20'AMITY RD ESMT.a -5'DRAINAGE SWALE ESMT. ! u - PRESERVE MAINT AGREEMENT &MANT.AGREEMENT O.R. J I OR 2826 PG.2485 2826 PG.2485 11 I ' ID BOUNDARY MARKER h S I V 15'TYPE ls'TYPE R IN lo "D'BUFFER "D'BUFFER LLO LAND USE SUMMARY N (' w TRACT LAND USE ACREAGE ( -g 5'TYPE i TRACT"R" RESIDENTIAL 59.43+1-AC O w w TRACT•P PRESERVE 24.20+A AC I J — - y TRACT'RA"RECREATION AREA 0.91+/-AC w TRACT"L• LAKEIWATER MANAGEMENT 10.28+F.AC ZONNG:A-AGRICULTURE ? 1 ACCESS DRIVE/R.O.W. 12.84+/-AC CURRENT LAND USE:SINGLE FAMILY F TOTAL 108.44+1-AC 1 - 20'TYPE RESIDENTIAL,VACANT LAND i "Q"BUFFER MAXIMUM DENSITY - 15'TYPE PROPERTY BOUNDARY, ta I I 'B"BUFFER 288 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS 1- a= R I 180 DWELLING UNITS DERIVED FROM d l 15'TYPE BASE 1 "B"BUFFER I DENSITY;108 FROM TDR'S CJ II — R 3 I I0� I RPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES PROPERTY EA 170'FPL EASEMENT 1.WITHIN THE RPUD BOUNDARIES THERE WILL BE —_ � f BOUNDARY '-o R 678, ■ A MINIMUM OF 60%OPEN SPACE. R (1—- — 1 PG.1765 ZONING:A- 2.THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN AGRICULTURE ON THIS PUD MASTER PLAN SHALL BE E �E-,- it., SINGLE LAND USE Y CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. (77,:; ';; RESIDENTIAL,VACANT 1 THE DESIGN,LOCATION,AND CONFIGURATION 71 LAND. I OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE I DEFINED AT EITHER PRELIMINARY I SUBDIVISION PLAT APPROVAL,OR 1- 30'TYPE 15'TYPE 'A'BUFFER "B"BUFFER w 15'TYPE ,I CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL. "D"BUFFER ENTIAL FUTURE 4.REQUIRED PRESERVE 2129 AC(25%OF 85.17 INTERCONNECT V I PREP RVVE PROVIDED:2420 ACATION. 1- ZONING:A• ° m AGRICULTURAL ° 6 5. BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION(S)TO I \ CURRENT LAND USE: THE MULTI-USE PATH ALONG COLLIER 10'TYPE NURSERY 30 R/W .I BOULEVARD "A"BUFFER OA 32� MAY BE PROVIDED AT TIME OF PPL OR SDP. PG.259�I PROPERTY PROPERTY BOUNDARY EASEMENT. BOUNDARY ZONING:A-AGRICULTURALIMELAOSE ROW rm REMAIN jI 6 . MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS MAY BE MET WITH EXISTING E: CURRENT LAND US NURSERY PRESERVE.WHERE THE PRESERVE DOES NOT SABAL PALM ROAD r MEET THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ZONING:PUD,WINDING CYPRESS REQUIREMENTS,PLANTING TO MEET THESE CURRENT LAND USE:RESIDENTIAL,VERONA /ID REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE REQUIRED. r r .� . 6610.1on Pm ono.P..717.27147 m WATERMEN AT ROCKEDGE ROCKEDGE 951 n osm NAPLES,LLC RPUD 2 PEP.2ND ROUND CpWTV COMMENTS 5P. W 10!0415 ENGINl ERIN6 t6B 1B 54 m.[ ...8n0 15 -"1=300..PU . 23 50` 26E 1 PER IST.ROUND COUNTY COMMENTS SPC P' 01;09/15 -- - - MASTER P...AN `PUB MGM r-w .�u.> u.� ,:wna�rnwa SPC • • 1200300004' �PPNU PUN 117452015 1 at 2 +w-n riRwqur�w'.y.wn-aMaw,rswayM+2M��1�Y.-�.ru,r�y Page 6 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT B Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 1. The minimum lot width may be reduced by 20%,provided the minimum lot area requirement shall be maintained. 2. For multi-family product the front yard setbacks shall be measured from back of curb,or edge of pavement if not curbed. For all other unit types, front yard setbacks shall be measured from ROW line. The minimum 15' front yard setback may be reduced to 10'where the unit has a recessed or side-entry garage. Front-loading garages shall be set back a minimum of 23 feet from edge of sidewalk. 3. For corner lots, only 1 front yard setback shall be required. The yard that does not contain the driveway shall provide a minimum 10'setback. 4. The minimum distance between buildings may be reduced to 0'where attached garages are provided.However,the principal structures shall maintain a 10'minimum separation. 5. Accessory pool cage setbacks may be reduced to 0 feet when attached to a common privacy wall. 6. If single family development is pursued through the County's plat process,LMEs and LBEs will be platted as separate tracts. 7. When a lot abuts a lake maintenance easement (LME) or landscape buffer easement(LBE),the minimum rear yard shall be measured from the easement.Otherwise,the minimum rear yard shall be measured from the parcel boundaries. 8. In order to support a canopy tree with a minimum 20-foot crown spread as required in LDC Section 4.06.05,individual lots must accommodate enough space for the entire 20-foot canopy to be located wholly within the lot boundaries,except where the lot is adjacent to a lake maintenance easement and/or landscape buffer easement,in which case,a portion of the required 20-foot canopy may protrude into such area.Applies to all residential lots within the PUD. Page 5 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT B Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS Exhibit B sets forth the development standards for the RPUD Residential Subdistrict and Recreation Area Subdistrict. Standards not specifically set forth herein shall be those specified in applicable sections of the LDC in effect as of the date of approval of the site development plan (SDP)or subdivision plat. DEVELOPMENT SINGLE SINGLE DUPLEX& TOWNHOUSE8 MULTI- RECREATION STANDARDS FAMILY FAMILY TWO- FAMILY DETACHED8 ATTACHED& FAMILY° SINGLE FAMILY ZERO LOT LINES PRINCIPAL STRUCTURES MINIMUM LOT AREA 4,000 S.F. 3,500 S.F. 3,500 S.F. 1,600 S.F. PER N/A N/A PER UNIT UNIT MIN. LOT WIDTH ' 40 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 16 FEET N/A N/A MIN. FRONT YARD 2,3 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET 15 FEET MIN.SIDE YARD 5 FEET 0 OR10 FEET 0 AND 5 FEET 0 AND 5 FEET 10 FEET 1/2 BH MIN. REAR YARD 6,7 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MIN. PRESERVE SETBACK 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET 25 FEET MIN. DISTANCE BETWEEN 10 FEET 10 FEET 0 OR 10 FEET 0 OR 10 FEET 20 FEET Y2 sum of the BH STRUCTURES" MAX. ZONED BUILDING 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 45 FEET 35 FEET HEIGHT MAX.ACTUAL BUILDING 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 55 FEET 40 FEET HEIGHT ACCESSORY STRUCTURES MIN. FRONT YARD SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS SPS MIN. SIDE YARD SPS SPS SPS5 SPS5 SPS SPS MIN. REAR YARD 6,7 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 5 FEET 0 FEET MIN. PRESERVE SETBACK 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET 10 FEET MAX.ZONED BUILDING 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET 35 FEET HEIGHT MAX.ACTUAL BUILDING 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET 40 FEET HEIGHT BH: Building Height(zoned height) SPS:Same as Principal Structure Page 4 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014 2246 EXHIBIT A Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 3. Passive open space uses and structures, such as but not limited to landscaped areas, gazebos,park benches and walking trails. 4. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Community maintenance areas, and maintenance structures. 2. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. IV. PRESERVE AREA A. Permitted Uses: 1. Native preserves 2. Uses and structures that will not reduce the native preservation requirements, such as boardwalks, nature trails, gazebos, benches and viewing platforms, subject to approval by the permitting agencies and in accordance with the LDC. 3. Drainage and water management structures that will not reduce the native preservation requirement. 4. Any other conservation use or structure which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted uses, within a preserve, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. 5. Activities in the archaeological areas within the Preserve shall be in accordance with Exhibit F and the LDC. Page 3 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT A Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development 6. Temporary model homes 7. Model sales center 8. Any other principal use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted principal uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. B. Accessory Uses: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to swimming pools, spas, screen enclosures, private garages, and other recreational facilities. 2. Gatehouses and other access control structures. 3. Utility and water management facilities 4. Walls, berms, and signs. 5. Project sales, construction and administrative offices that may occur in residential and/or temporary structures. 6. Passive open space uses and structures, such as but not limited to landscaped areas, gazebos,park benches and walking trails. 7. Storage areas, for the exclusive use of the residents. 8. Community maintenance areas, and maintenance structures. 9. Any other accessory use which is comparable in nature with the foregoing list of permitted accessory uses, as determined by the Board of Zoning Appeals ("BZA") or Hearing Examiner, as applicable. III. RECREATION AREA A. Principal Uses: 1. Structures intended to provide social and recreational space for the private use of the residents and their guests. 2. Outdoor recreation facilities, such as a community swimming pool, tennis and basketball courts, playgrounds, pedestrian/bicycle pathways, and water features. Page 2 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 EXHIBIT A Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development Regulations for development of the Rockedge Residential Planned Unit Development (RPUD) shall be in accordance with the contents of this RPUD Ordinance and applicable sections of the Land Development Code (LDC) and Growth Management Plan (GMP) in effect at the time of issuance of Site Development Plan or Subdivision Plat. Where this RPUD Ordinance does not provide development standards, then the provisions of the specific sections of the LDC that are otherwise applicable shall apply. MAXIMUM DENSITY: There shall be no more than 266 residential dwelling units permitted on the± 106.44 gross acres, resulting in a maximum density of 2.5 dwelling units per acre. This PUD allows a base density of 1.5 units per acre or 160 dwelling units, and pursuant to the Urban Residential Fringe Subdistrict provisions of the Growth Management Plan, an additional 106 units are derived from Transfer of Development Rights (TDR). Redemption of TDR credits shall be per LDC Section 2.03.07.D.4(g). PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: I. GENERAL PERMITTED USES Guardhouses, gatehouses, access control structures, clock towers, fences, walls, columns, decorative hardscaping or architectural embellishments associated with the project's entrance features are permitted within the"R"designated area abutting the project's entrance,or within the private roadway as depicted on the PUD Master Plan, and shall have no required setbacks; however, such structures cannot be located where they create vehicular stacking or sight distance issues for motorists and pedestrians, and cannot exceed 35' in actual height. II. RESIDENTIAL A. Principal Uses: 1. Single family, detached 2. Single family, attached 3. Single family, zero lot line 4. Townhouse 5. Multi-family Page 1 of 14 11-17-2015 Rockedge RPUD PL#2014.2246 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) Rockedge PUD Amendment - PL20140002246 1, Eddy Garcia (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable)of watermen at Rockedge Naples.tic (company, if a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the(choose one)owner[applicant ontract purchaser and that 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Sean Martin,P E. to act as ourlmy representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp.pros. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's"Managing Member:" • if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner"of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words "as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, i declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Si nature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OFiIEER- The foregoing instrument was sworn to(or affirmed)and subscribed before me on •l vti\l,s (date) by _c - - C co (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as l,),.h. c, -e..-t— who is personally known_to me or who has produced (type of identification) as identification. _ STAMP/SE. 4,0 Notary Puwlo state at PI°ride Signature of Notary Public Maria sawn FF 026415 Mia corr+ pw ¢ 4 Expires 06!1612011 0'108-COA-00115\155 REV 3/24/14 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) Rockedge PUD Amendment - PL20140002246 i Eddy Garcia (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable) of Watermen at Rockedge Naples,LLC (company, If a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the(choose one)ownerLL purchaser and that: 1. i have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. I have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. We/I authorize Patrick Vanasse,AICP to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company(LC.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the `general partner"of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words"as trustee" • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, i declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated In it are true. Signature -- Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF BOLttEW The foregoing instrument was sworn to(or affirmed)and subscribed before me on Et I t 5 (date) by & C c - (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as v,,e>_c..t a who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identificationras identification. STAMP/SEAL a►Y Notary pua staff of Florida Signature of Notary Public Mafia Garcia My y Commission Fw=026415 94, OF Expires 06/16(2017 Of CM-WA-00115\155 REV 3/24/14 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITIONNUMBERS(S) Rockedge PUD Amendment - PL20140002246 Eddy Garcia (print name), as Manager (title, if applicable)of Watermen at Rockedge Naples,u.c (company, If applicable), swear or affirm under oath,that I am the(choose one)owner ,/ applicants . 'contract purchasers land that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. i have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Weil authorize Richard Yavanovich to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. *Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp.pres. or v. pres. • if the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the "general partner"of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words"as trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. ignature w Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF GOLAIE - „ The foregoing instrument was sworn to(or affirmed)and subscribed before me on at v,-V 5 (date) by (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as who is personally known to me or who has produced (type of identification)as identification. STAMP/SEAL Notary Punic State of Florida Signature of Notary Public ,P Maria D Garcia My Commission FF 026415 mx Expires 0611612017 CP\08-COA-06115\155 REV 3/24/14 THENCE S01°05'30"W ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 328.19 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 328.19 FEET SOUTH OF(AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR)AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N89°01'53"E ON SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 663.85 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST HALF(E-1/4)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°10'38"E ON SAID EAST LINE FOR 328.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS THAT PART OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 321, PAGE 259, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL CONTAINS 106.44 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. BEARINGS HEREINABOVE MENTIONED ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST TO BEAR NORTH 89°01'58" EAST. 3. N40°29'08"W FOR 30.05 FEET; 4. N49°40'54"E FOR 22.10 FEET; 5. THENCE N36°22'15"E FOR 436.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°42'08"W ON SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 785.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°01'01"E FOR 332.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE- 1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°32'04"W FOR 994.18 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°42'08"E FOR 331.15 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE- 1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°56'29"W FOR 660.13 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE- 1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°57'42"W FOR 330.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°47'35"W ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 230.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 100 FEET EAST OF(AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR)AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N00°51'53"E ON SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1642.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/2)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°22'01"E FOR 894.88 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N00°58'45"E FOR 662.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST(NE-1/4)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 996.40 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF(E-1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA;THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 664.25 FEET ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF TRACT"Fl" OF THE PLAT OF ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55, PAGE 1, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S01°14'38"W FOR 675.75 FEET ON SAID WEST LINE OF TRACT"F1"TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT"Fl"; THENCE S01°14'14"W ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 675.73 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S89°42'08"W ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 662.30 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4466, PAGE 3476, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE EAST AND SOUTH LINES OF SAID PARCEL: 1. S01°09'56"W FOR 617.91 FEET; 2. N89°34'54"W FOR 300.19 FEET; 3. S01°09'09"W FOR 435.95 FEET; 4. N89°34'09"W FOR 150.16 FEET; 5. N89°38'05"W FOR 210.56 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (E-1/2)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°05'19"E ON SAID WEST LINE FOR 43.72 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF(S-1/2)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE- 1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°48'02"W ON SAID NORTH LINE FOR 15.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4970, PAGE 3362,SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FOUR BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE SOUTH,WEST AND NORTH LINES OF SAID PARCEL 1: 1. S01°05'19"W ON SAID EAST LINE FOR 303.80 FEET; 2. N89°37'28"W FOR 645.47 FEET; 3. N01°01'07"E FOR 302.01 FEET 4. S89°47'35"E FOR 30.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND RECORDED IN IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4466, PAGE 3476,SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL: 1. N01°01'01"E FOR 218.98 FEET; 2. N52°35'40"E FOR 646.23 FEET; Offer er Co my COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www,colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as (Street address and City,State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Rockedge planned unit development ( Residential PUD) zoning. We hereby designate Eddy Garda , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such,these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to,the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms, conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan,even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements,conditions,or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms,conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. a ner Owner Eddy Garcia Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) Sworn to(or affirmed)and subscribed before me this `\... day of � _ 201,by e---c- who is j rsanally.knuwn..ta.me..or has produced as identification. r a� Notary Public State of florid Garcia N.tar Public My Go© issonFF026415 Y Expire5o6l16t2017 e typed,printed or stamped) OFf 9/11/2014 Page 10 of 15 THENCE S01°05'30"W ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 328.19 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 328.19 FEET SOUTH OF(AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR)AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N89°01'53"E ON SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 663.85 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST HALF(E-1/4)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°10'38"E ON SAID EAST LINE FOR 328.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS THAT PART OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 321, PAGE 259, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL CONTAINS 106.44 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. BEARINGS HEREINABOVE MENTIONED ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST TO BEAR NORTH 89°01'58" EAST. 3. N40°29'08"W FOR 30.05 FEET; 4. N49°40'54"E FOR 22.10 FEET; 5. THENCE N36°22'15"E FOR 436.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°42'08"W ON SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 785.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°01'01"E FOR 332.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE- 1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°32'04"W FOR 994.18 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°42'08"E FOR 331.15 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE- 1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°56'29"W FOR 660.13 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE- 1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°57'42"W FOR 330.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°47'35"W ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 230.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 100 FEET EAST OF(AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR)AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N00°51'53"E ON SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1642.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/2)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°22'01"E FOR 894.88 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N00°58'45"E FOR 662.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST(NE-1/4)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 996.40 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF(E-1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA;THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 664.25 FEET ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF TRACT"Fl"OF THE PLAT OF ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55, PAGE 1, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S01°14'38"W FOR 675.75 FEET ON SAID WEST LINE OF TRACT"Fl"TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT"Fl"; THENCE S01°14'14"W ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 675.73 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S89°42'08"W ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 662.30 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4466, PAGE 3476, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE EAST AND SOUTH LINES OF SAID PARCEL: 1. S01°09'56"W FOR 617.91 FEET; 2. N89°34'54"W FOR 300.19 FEET; 3. S01°09'09"W FOR 435.95 FEET; 4. N89°34'09"W FOR 150.16 FEET; 5. N89°38'05"W FOR 210.56 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (E-1/2)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°05'19"E ON SAID WEST LINE FOR 43.72 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF(S-1/2)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE- 1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°48'02"W ON SAID NORTH LINE FOR 15.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4970, PAGE 3362,SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FOUR BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE SOUTH,WEST AND NORTH LINES OF SAID PARCEL 1: 1. S01°05'19"W ON SAID EAST LINE FOR 303.80 FEET; 2. N89°37'28"W FOR 645.47 FEET; 3. N01°01'07"E FOR 302.01 FEET 4. S89°47'35"E FOR 30.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND RECORDED IN IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4466, PAGE 3476,SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL: 1. N01°01'01"E FOR 218.98 FEET; 2. N52°35'40"E FOR 646.23 FEET; +I er County COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 urmo.o.colliergov.net (239)252 4400 FAX:(239)252-5358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as (Street address and City,State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Rockedge planned unit development ( PUD)zoning. We hereby designate Eddy Garcia , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such,these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes,but is not limited to,the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms,conditions,safeguards,and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan,even if the property is subsequently sold In whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements,conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5. So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development and the County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into compliance with all terms,conditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. Owner Owner Belly Mason Printed Name Printed Name STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLLIER) rd Sworn to(or affirmed)and subscribed before me this a day of Ode/beg— 201k by +►*"e / . ,,,.. who is personally known to me or has produced / t as identification. ate /V dry r e,. .w._._.r_.. . me typed,printed or stamped) 9/11/2014 „,,,,, Page 10 of 15 4 ` ,u mussel it EE208455 EXPIRES:,Mme 14,2018 Bond 4,it . edPint Nete/Public Underneen< e;, THENCE S01°05'30"W ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 328.19 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 328.19 FEET SOUTH OF(AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR)AND PARALLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE N89°01'53"E ON SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 663.85 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF THE EAST HALF(E-1/4)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°10'38"E ON SAID EAST LINE FOR 328.19 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. LESS THAT PART OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY CONTAINED IN DEED RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 321, PAGE 259, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL CONTAINS 106.44 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. BEARINGS HEREINABOVE MENTIONED ARE BASED ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST TO BEAR NORTH 89°01'58" EAST. 3. N40°29'08"W FOR 30.05 FEET; 4. N49°40'54"E FOR 22.10 FEET; 5. THENCE N36°22'15"E FOR 436.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE 589°42'08"W ON SAID SOUTH LINE FOR 785.71 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°01'01"E FOR 332.01 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE- 1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S89°32'04"W FOR 994.18 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER (SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°42'08"E FOR 331.15 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE- 1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°56'29"W FOR 660.13 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE- 1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°57'42"W FOR 330.68 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE S00°54'12"W FOR 329.09 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW-1/4) OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°47'35"W ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 230.44 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH A LINE 100 FEET EAST OF(AS MEASURED ON A PERPENDICULAR)AND PARALLEL WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N00°51'53"E ON SAID PARALLEL LINE FOR 1642.03 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/2)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°22'01"E FOR 894.88 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N00°58'45"E FOR 662.08 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST(NE-1/4) OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 996.40 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF(E-1/2)OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER(NE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST,COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE CENTER OF SECTION 23,TOWNSHIP 50 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA;THENCE N89°01'58"E FOR 664.25 FEET ON THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 23 TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF TRACT"Fl" OF THE PLAT OF ESPLANADE AT HACIENDA LAKES AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 55, PAGE 1, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE S01°14'38"W FOR 675.75 FEET ON SAID WEST LINE OF TRACT"Fl"TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID TRACT"Fl"; THENCE S01°14'14"W ON THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER(NW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23 FOR 675.73 FEET TO THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID FRACTION; THENCE S89°42'08"W ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID FRACTION FOR 662.30 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH EAST LINE OF A PARCEL OF LAND AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4466, PAGE 3476, PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE EAST AND SOUTH LINES OF SAID PARCEL: 1. S01°09'56"W FOR 617.91 FEET; 2. N89°34'54"W FOR 300.19 FEET; 3. S01°09'09"W FOR 435.95 FEET; 4. N89°34'09"W FOR 150.16 FEET; 5. N89°38'05"W FOR 210.56 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (E-1/2) OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE-1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N01°05'19"E ON SAID WEST LINE FOR 43.72 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH HALF(S-1/2)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER(SE- 1/4)OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER(SW-1/4)OF SAID SECTION 23; THENCE N89°48'02"W ON SAID NORTH LINE FOR 15.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE EAST LINE OF PARCEL 1 AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4970, PAGE 3362,SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FOUR BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE SOUTH,WEST AND NORTH LINES OF SAID PARCEL 1: 1. S01°05'19"W ON SAID EAST LINE FOR 303.80 FEET; 2. N89°37'28"W FOR 645.47 FEET; 3. N01°01'07"E FOR 302.01 FEET 4. S89°47'35"E FOR 30.00 FEET TO AN INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL OF LAND RECORDED IN IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 4466, PAGE 3476,SAID PUBLIC RECORDS; THENCE THE FOLLOWING FIVE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES ON THE WEST LINE OF SAID PARCEL: 1. N01°01'01"E FOR 218.98 FEET; 2. N52°35'40"E FOR 646.23 FEET; Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES,FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239)252-2400 FAX:(239)252-6358 COVENANT OF UNIFIED CONTROL The undersigned do hereby swear or affirm that we are the fee simple titleholders and owners of record of property commonly known as (Street address and City,State and Zip Code) and legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto. The property described herein is the subject of an application for Rockedge planned unit development ( Residential PUD) zoning. We hereby designate Eddy Garcia , legal representative thereof, as the legal representatives of the property and as such,these individuals are authorized to legally bind all owners of the property in the course of seeking the necessary approvals to develop. This authority includes, but is not limited to, the hiring and authorization of agents to assist in the preparation of applications, plans, surveys, and studies necessary to obtain zoning approval on the site. These representatives will remain the only entity to authorize development activity on the property until such time as a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to Collier County. The undersigned recognize the following and will be guided accordingly in the pursuit of development of the project: 1. The property will be developed and used in conformity with the approved master plan including all conditions placed on the development and all commitments agreed to by the applicant in connection with the planned unit development rezoning. 2. The legal representative identified herein is responsible for compliance with all terms,conditions, safeguards, and stipulations made at the time of approval of the master plan,even if the property is subsequently sold in whole or in part, unless and until a new or amended covenant of unified control is delivered to and recorded by Collier County. 3. A departure from the provisions of the approved plans or a failure to comply with any requirements,conditions, or safeguards provided for in the planned unit development process will constitute a violation of the Land Development Code. 4. All terms and conditions of the planned unit development approval will be incorporated into covenants and restrictions which run with the land so as to provide notice to subsequent owners that all development activity within the planned unit development must be consistent with those terms and conditions. 5, So long as this covenant is in force, Collier County can, upon the discovery of noncompliance with the terms, safeguards, and conditions of the planned unit development, seek equitable relief as necessary to compel compliance. The County will not issue permits, certificates, or licenses to occupy or use any part of the planned unit development a a e County may stop ongoing construction activity until the project is brought into complia - „00 terms; onditions and safeguards of the planned unit development. dab Brian "e M� '€S c.v.(' i)7trC 1" �4n«,'Js`i..tr— O/ Ate 7/c f �i C. O' 4 c l' Printed Name Printed Name' STATE OF FLORIDA) COUNTY OF COLDER) Sworn to(or affirmed)and subscribed before me this 11. day of l' ''`(.:.• 201. by�'C3('i( t ? who is personally known to me or has produced lit, as identification. ry��.y���p CAM t,1I v . Ly(+1i'NVeiY° LAURA ELIZABETH .'.., MYGOMMISSIONSEE129621 No ry P •lic A. c_ .,� EXPtRE *tenter t9,2 (N a typ •,printed or stamped) l''forfl, aura E.Carl 9/11/2014 Page 10 of 15 ROCKEDGE ZONING:PUD,COLLIER REGIONAL ZONING:MPUD,HACIENDA LAKES MEDICAL CENTER RPUD MASTER PLAN CURRENT LAND USE:SINGLE FAMILY I CURRENT LAND USE:PRESERVE RESIDENTIAL SUB-DIVISION 1 130'ROADWAY i —j— 15'TYPE EASEMENT O.R.635 I ' 15'TYPE ER R "B"BUFFER PG.1273 ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE CURRENT LAND USE:SINGLE I FAMILY RESIDENTIAL P ' I j R j J 1 J P : ZONING:MPUD, 1 HACIENDA LAKES R 15'TYPE 9 I CURRENT LAND USE: 36'WIDE �? ! "B"BUFFER SINGLE FAMILY ~ 1 EASEMENT RESIDENTIAL O.R.34761 = = I SUBDIVISION PG.1632 I 0 1115, �, I i ' PG.1006 i f - 9 �� PROPERTY O.R.2469, ,. BOUNDARY PG.584 fr IITO BE ZONING:A- I VACATED �� AGRICULTURE CURRENT LAND ,—20' I i , USE:SINGLE LME FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LI- w I R - A-AGRICULTURE e CURRENT LAND USE: co w ', ; VACANT LAND 15'TYPE 15'TYPE Lu z [ "B"BUFFER "B"BUFFER I ' J : : o II ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE I PROPERTY BOUNDARY CURRENT LAND USE:SINGLE FAMILY R I RESIDENTIAL,VACANT LAND // POTENTIAL FUTURE BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN II INTERCONNECTION L - - 20' _ 0 LME II ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE PROPERTY BOUNDARY CURRENT LAND USE:NURSERY/SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL R +I - 15'TYPE B"BUFFER LEGEND 15'TYPE — "D"BUFFER L 1 ■ I R RESIDENTIAL I R 15'TYPE "B"BUFFER PROPERTY BOUNDARY RA AREA ,10 R P PRESERVE ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE TRAFFIC FLOW 15'TYPE CURRENT LAND USE: -- PATTERN "B"BUFFER NURSERY R 15'TYPE 5 , DEVIATIONS "B"BUFFER ■ t ' i (11 } i 1 ,,:, WATER I I! 20 _ PROPERTY BOUNDARY MANAGEMENT LAKE LME 1 i 1 ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE - ARCHAEOLOGICAL ' 1 I CURRENT LAND USE: O VACANT LAND } PRESERVE 15'TYPE i aI 0 I' "B"BUFFER L. BOUNDARY 20'TYPE z; sAxAl_l'Al i M Roau MARKER %"D"BUFFER i ni a eS9 WATERMEN AT ROCKEDGE ROCKEDGE PER IST ROUND COUNTY NCOMENT SPC °n'a 059 R!f 9159 s NAPLES,LLC RPUD .:�..: Iona=-1- --_ -_____ a� Z I qEV ION ROUND COUNTY COMMENTS SPC OO/09/15 KMW E LB 6951 /O9/15 1'300 N/A 13 SOS ]6E ' MASTER PLAN I ENGINEERING +rwv on+[ ` SPC 1300300004 RPUD PLAN 7 IUIY 2015 2 of 2 ROCKEDGE ' LEGEND ZONING:TTRVC RPUD MASTER PLAN ' R RESIDENTIAL CURRENT LAND USE:RV PARK L RA RECREATIONAL JOHN'S ROAD =�i AREA 1c.: :-- . PROPERTY P PRESERVE BOUNDARY I , I I _y TRAFFIC FLOW PATTERN 1I I 5 1 DEVIATIONS 15'TYPE ZONING: "B"BUFFER - i I WATER A-AGRICULTURAL 20' L. MANAGEMENT LAKE (SCATTERED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL) L i LME I ARCHAEOLOGICAL Ij AREA I 1 I PRESERVE 20'AMITY RD ESMT.& -5'DRAINAGE SWALE ESMT. 1 MAINT AGREEMENT &MAINT.AGREEMENT O.R. OR 2826 PG.2485 I 2826 PG.2485 I I•I BOUNDARY ` I \ MARKER ■ - i- I 10. D„B 15'TYPE R IN 15'UFFER "D"BUFFER u. LAND USE SUMMARY w TRACT LAND USE ACREAGE I 15'TYPE w TRACT"R" RESIDENTIAL 59.43+/_AC cp"B"BUFFER RA d III R + - - _ w TRACT"P" PRESERVE 24.20+/_AC J J }_ _ - . I w TRACT"RA"RECREATION AREA 0.91+/-AC Q I w TRACT"L" LAKE/WATER MANAGEMENT 10.26+/-AC z Z F ZONING:A-AGRICULTURE 7, ACCESS DRIVE/R.O.W. 12.64+/-AC w CURRENT LAND USE:SINGLE FAMILY I F TOTAL 106.44+/_AC >w'' —L-20'TYPE 1 RESIDENTIAL,VACANT LAND -J 2 a�' "D"BUFFER MAXIMUM DENSITY Z al ,' -_j "B5'TYPE ER PROPERTY BOUNDARY .I o 266 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS = 1 z a , R 160 DWELLING UNITS DERIVED FROM IX - f 15'TYPE DESE � g¢ I l - II R "B" 9 BUFFER DENSITY;106 FROM TDR'S U a 3'M' ! I RPUD MASTER PLAN NOTES c PROPERTY EASEMENT 11.WITHIN THE RPUD BOUNDARIES THERE WILL BE w I , BOUNDARY O.R:678, r A MINIMUM OF 60%OPEN SPACE. 9 I R PG.1765 o I I { ZONING:A- 2.THE FACILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS SHOWN I AGRICULTURE ON THIS PUD MASTER PLAN SHALL BE 20' - CURRENT LAND USE CONSIDERED CONCEPTUAL IN NATURE. LME I I L I SINGLE FAMILY , RESIDENTIAL VACANT I I I i Ilr 7 d } S C 3.THE DESIGN,LOCATION,AND CONFIGURATION __ ..__ LAND I OF THE LAND IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE I DEFINED AT EITHER PRELIMINARY 1 li SUBDIVISION PLAT APPROVAL,OR + - --10'TYPE 15'TYPE CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND PLAT APPROVAL. II "A"BUFFER B BUFFER w 15'TYPE POTENTIAL FUTURE "D"BUFFER W 4.REQUIRED PRESERVE:21.29 AC(25%OF 85.17 INTERCONNECT s AC OF EXISTING NATIVE VEGETATION. m Z PRESERVE PROVIDED:24.20 AC I ` AGRICU TURAL w x 5. BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION(S)TO I W o CURRENT LAND USE: w THE MULTI-USE PATH ALONG COLLIER 10'TYPE NURSERY 30'R/W 'I BOULEVARD "A"BUFFER O.R.321- I MAY BE PROVIDED AT TIME OF PPL OR SDP. PG.259 PROPERTY PROPERTY BOUNDARY EASEMENT F BOUNDARY ZONING:A-AGRICULTURAL/MELROSE ROW TO REMAIN 16. MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFERING REQUIREMENTS MAY BE MET WITH EXISTING CURRENT LAND USE:NURSERY I PRESERVE.WHERE THE PRESERVE DOES NOT SAB,\Lrnl.M ROAD MEET THE MINIMUM LANDSCAPE BUFFERING ZONING:PUD,WINDING CYPRESS REQUIREMENTS,PLANTING TO MEET THESE CURRENT LAND USE:RESIDENTIAL,VERONA REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE REQUIRED. 6610 PM1Dv s 250 , NAPLES,LLC ` ROCKEDGE -- -- -- --- i--- (23915,7-0575 1219159 0578 k a a3a 9 WATERMEN AT ROCKEDGE RO � RPUD 2 I P 2ND POU D CO U TYCOMMENTS I SPC I PV 10]04/15 ENGINEERING E A 1 PER 1ST ROUND COUNTY COMMENTS 5 C PV 0/09/1 ----- _ ]663 L86992 N/A 23 SOS 26E MASTER PLAN ...12003 .___.I 0 uv.'REV�sloe W uvm r�i ru "��_ PV SPC 120030.0000 RPUD PLAN 7 IUEV 2015 1-"f 2