Loading...
HEX Agenda 07/23/2015COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER HEARINGS AGENDA JULY 239 2015 AGENDA THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER WILL HOLD A HEARING AT 9:00 AM ON THURSDAY, DULY 23, 2015 IN CONFERENCE ROOM 610 AT THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT/PLANNING & REGULATION BUILDING, 2800 N. HORSESHOE DRIVE, NAPLES, FLORIDA INDIVIDUAL SPEAKERS WILL BE LIMITED TO 5 MINUTES UNLESS OTHERWISE WAIVED BY THE HEARING EXAMINER. PERSONS WISHING TO HAVE WRITTEN OR GRAPHIC MATERIALS INCLUDED IN THE HEARING REPORT PACKETS MUST HAVE THAT MATERIAL SUBMITTED TO COUNTY STAFF 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE HEARING. ALL MATERIALS USED DURING PRESENTATION AT THE HEARING WILL BECOME A PERMANENT PART OF THE RECORD. ANY PERSON WHO DECIDES TO APPEAL A DECISION OF THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL NEED A RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS PERTAINING THERETO, AND THEREFORE MAY NEED TO ENSURE THAT A VERBATIM RECORD OF THE PROCEEDINGS IS MADE, WHICH RECORD INCLUDES THE TESTIMONY AND EVIDENCE UPON WHICH THE APPEAL IS TO BE BASED. DECISIONS OF THE HEARING EXAMINER ARE FINAL UNLESS APPEALED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. HEARING PROCEDURES WILL PROVIDE FOR PRESENTATION BY THE APPLICANT, PRESENTATION BY STAFF, PUBLIC COMMENT AND APPLICANT REBUTTAL. THE HEARING EXAMINER WILL RENDER A DECISION WITHIN 30 DAYS. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE A COPY OF THE DECISION BY MAIL MAY SUPPLY COUNTY STAFF WITH THEIR NAME, ADDRESS, AND A STAMPED, SELF-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE FOR THAT PURPOSE. PERSONS WISHING TO RECEIVE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE DECISION MAY SUPPLY THEIR EMAIL ADDRESS. 1. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. REVIEW OF AGENDA 3. APPROVAL OF PRIOR MEETING MINUTES: June 11, 2015; June 25, 2015 4. ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARINGS: A. PETITION NO. BD-PL20140001542 — Ken and Kathleen Demaret request a 30-foot boat dock extension over the maximum 20 feet limit in Section 5.03.06 of the Land Development Code for a total protrusion of 50 feet to accommodate a boat dock facility for the benefit of Lot 160, Isles of Capri Unit 2 Subdivision, also described as 192 Tahiti Circle, in Section 32, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Fred Reischl, AICP, Principal Planner] B. PETITION NO. VA-PL20150000006 — Don and Victoria Strumillo request a variance from Section 4.02.03 A., Table 4 of the Land Development Code, to reduce the minimum accessory structure side yard setback from 25 feet to 2 feet for a renovated pool and pool deck, and a proposed new pool screen enclosure and colonnade, and from Section 5.04.03 of the Pelican Bay PUD, Ordinance No. 77-18, as amended, to reduce the minimum tract boundary setback line from 25 feet to 19 feet for a permitted lanai expansion, on property located at Lot 9, Point Verde at Pelican Bay, in Section 4, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida [Coordinator: Rachel Beasley, Planner] C. PETITION NO. PDI-PL20150000736 — Naples RV Resort, LLC requests an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 07-85, as amended, the Naples Motorcoach Resort Commercial Planned Unit Development, to increase the maximum floor area of small motorcoach utility buildings from 100 square feet to 308 square feet; to decrease the minimum setbacks for personal utility buildings; to replace the Typical Motorcoach Lot detail exhibit; and to increase the maximum length of residency from 6 months to 9 months per year. The subject property consists of 23.2± acres located on the south side of Tamiami Trail East (U.S. 41), approximately 3/4 mile east of Collier Boulevard (S.R. 951) in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. [Coordinator: Eric Johnson, AICP, CFM, Principal Planner] 5. OTHER BUSINESS 6. PUBLIC COMMENTS 7. ADJOURN June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Naples, Florida June 11, 2015 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Hearing Examiner, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples, Florida, with the following people present: HEARING EXAMINER MARK STRAIN Also Present: Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Managing Assistant County Attorney Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager Page 1 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting EXHIBITS: DESCRIPTION PAGE Item 4A - Petition No. CU-PL20140001335 A - Staff Report 7 B - Legal Advertisement 7 C - Photos 19 Item 4B - Petition No. ZVL(CUD)-PL20150000867 A - Staff Report 5 B - Legal Advertisement 5 Item 4C - Petition No. SV-PL20140000590 A - Staff Report 83 B - Legal Advertisement 83 ************* PROCEEDINGS: HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Good morning, everyone. If everybody will please take their seats, and we'll get the meeting started. Good morning. Welcome to the Thursday, June 1 lth meeting of the Collier County Hearing Examiner's office. If everybody will please rise for Pledge of Allegiance. (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you. We have a few housekeeping matters to announce. Individual speakers will be limited to five minutes unless otherwise waived. Decisions are final unless appealed to the Board of County Commissioners, and a decision will be rendered within 30 days. And with that, we'll move into the review of the agenda. We have three items advertised for today. The first item will be the Diocese of Venice of Florida, St. Peter's Catholic Church, the second one is Piper's Crossing 1202, LLC, and the third one is Lotus, also known as Alamo Gunworks Naples, LLC. Because of the obvious length it's going to take to get through Petition A -- Petition B is an affirmation of a verification letter. It's a rather short discussion usually, depending on how many members of the public are here. Is anybody here from the public that would like -- or attended to discuss the Piper's Crossing application? (No response.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. We're going to move that one as first on the agenda, and then we'll move into St. Peter's right after that. I have reviewed the minutes from the prior meeting for the court reporter's benefit. They are approved, so they can be recorded. ***And then we'll move right into -- the first petition will be the Petition No. ZVL(CUD)-PL20150000867, Piper's Crossing 1202, LLC, an affirmation of a zoning verification letter. All those wishing to testify on behalf of this item, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you. And as far as my disclosures, I'll have those in just a second. The only thing I've done is review the files, and I talked to the gentleman here before the meeting started to find out if anybody was here to object to his so we could accelerate his portion of the agenda. The Exhibit A will be the staff report; Exhibit B will be the legal ad. Page 2 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting And, sir, since there's nobody here objecting to this, I have read the staff report. I am familiar with it. I did not have any questions in regards to its --into the package. Staff has done a good job in writing the affirmation, so I don't have anything to go any further with it. Do you have anything you want to add to the record? MR. BRUGGER: I don't, sir. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Thank you. THE COURT REPORTER: Could I get your name? MR. BRUGGER: John Brugger. I'm an attorney here in Naples. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Ray, did you have any staff report? MR. BELLOWS: Just that we're recommending approval. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. With that, there's no other need for any further testimony. Any members of the public, again, wishing to speak on this item? (No response.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Hearing none, we'll close this hearing, and you'll have a decision within 30 days but most likely within seven to 10 days. MR. BRUGGER: Thank you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you, sir. ***Okay. The next item up --we'll move back to the agenda item. It will be 4B now. It would be the Petition No. CU-PL20140001335, the Diocese of Venice of Florida, Inc., St. Peter's Catholic Church on the north side of Rattlesnake Hammock Road. All those wishing to testify on behalf of this item, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Disclosures on my part, I've talked with staff, I've reviewed the files, I've talked with the applicant a couple of times, I've talked with the commissioner from the district, and I've also talked with Chris Horton this morning in the hallway before the meeting started. The staff -- the Exhibit A will be the staff report; Exhibit B will be the legal ad, and I believe the applicant has some exhibits we will be adding once we work our way through the meeting and revolving the buffers and setback -- the fence, I believe it is, fence and buffers that are going to be utilized in this project. So with that, Mr. Mulhere, I know you represent the applicant. We'll need a formal presentation, so... MR. MULHERE: Thank you. For the record, my name is Bob Mulhere. I'm here with the firm Hole Montes representing St. Peter's Catholic Church and the Diocese of Venice. Here with me this morning also from Hole Montes is George Hermanson, who is the civil engineer that is working on the site, and Paula McMichael, who is a planner with Hole Montes. From the Diocese we have Bo Nepip here in attendance and also Father G, who is the pastor of St. Peter's. There's a number of other people from the church and -- but if they're going to speak, they'll get up individually to speak. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Bob, for your benefit, because this room doesn't have the typical overhead features that we have in the other rooms in the county where you can make a presentation or put things on the overhead, I have entered into the -- into this slide series some of the more graphic representations from your packet. What I'll do is I'll walk through those now for the benefit of the audience so everybody can see what is currently being proposed, and then as you go on with your presentation, if you'd like to refer to any of them, just tell me which one, and I'll try to move back to it. This is the locational information. The colored -in orange "A," that's the property that is in question today. In a graphic, it's shown basically like this (indicating.) Here's a little more detail of the initial use of the property. They're going to be putting in additional parking for the St. Peter's Catholic Church. And the future will be inclusive of a rectory towards the north end. This is a survey showing some of the easements on the property, of which I will have questions on as we go forward today. Page 3 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting The applicant has met with the neighborhood during a neighborhood information meeting. As a result of that meeting, they've added some detail into an enhanced buffer and fencing. These are some of the details that will be made part of the record depending on the outcome of the discussion today. And this is the other buffer and fence locations that they are discussing. And that takes us through the exhibits that I've placed on the overhead, so... MR. Nf LHERE: Thank you. Just with respect to the location and just in case anybody doesn't know, this subject -- this church has been here for quite some time. They've purchased this property, which you see, you know, highlighted there as the subject site, also quite some time ago, always with the intention of providing additional parking and potentially a rectory. Presently the rectory is close by but off site. It's east of Tamiami Trail on the north side of U.S. 41 (sic). Could we go to the detailed PUD exhibit. The next one. There we go. In designing this site, we had a few challenges. The county was in the process of relocating an existing pump station which was along the northern portion, and that is going to be relocated into the area where it is indicated on that plan. Also the -- if you look to the property, this is all grass parking with paved aisleways. This is -- this parking is probably the furthest remote -- on site but remote from the church itself. So the likelihood of using this parking weekly or day to day is somewhat limited, but the church is very, very busy, especially during the season. Also we know, everyone knows, that there's additional growth occurring in the East Naples area. So it's likely that there's going to be additional usage of the parish facilities. As a result, the time was upon the church to now invest the money to use this lot that was bought quite some time ago for the additional parking that they need. But the point that I'm trying to make is that this parking's going to be used for those masses or those church activities, primarily in season, that have the highest parking demand. Now, we heard at the neighborhood information meeting that the existing parking wasn't fully utilized, that people parked within the right-of-way outside of and around the church. And I really can't dispute whether people park in the right-of-way around the church. I'm sure they do. That becomes, in my view, a function of enforcement by the Sheriffs Office. The church is doing what it should do in a responsible planning way to provide some additional parking on a piece of property that they long planned for that purpose and for a future rectory. So I think, you know, with respect to people parking in the right-of-way, it becomes an enforcement issue. One of the conditions of approval was that we install "no parking" signage on Rattlesnake Hammock and the surrounding public rights -of -way. As far as parking within private areas, that really is the responsibility of those private areas to enforce either towing or no parking or something along that lines; however, the way we've designed this, if that is an issue -- and we heard, I think, from some folks to the north that people were parking at -- I think there's a recreation facility or something along those lines where people were parking and then coming down the public pathway along the canal there. Again, we really can't control people walking along a public pathway along the canal; however, we have proposed a landscape buffer and extending at -- what we propose is a 6-foot fence all the way north and then along the -- all the way along the western boundary and then the northern boundary, which should present a barrier from anybody cutting through and will also, obviously, be a barrier for headlights and things along those lines. So I don't know about people coming down the pathway that extends beyond our property, but we will -- our landscape exhibit does provide for a 6-foot-high fence. Let's talk about the landscape buffer, because it appears that the largest issues here are related to how we've designed this plan and how it might affect our neighbors. So if you could go to the landscape exhibit. I don't know that members of the public saw this. We did provide them -- we sent a letter out in advance of this meeting to folks that were at the -- it was an email, actually, I guess -- to folks that were at the neighborhood information meeting that gave us their email address, and we provided them with a typical Page 4 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting landscape plan. This one is actually enhanced from that plan. We enhanced this landscape plan after meeting with staff. So the exhibit that you see, that is along the east side adjacent to the canal. I think probably the better one to go to is the other exhibit for now. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Along that canal, though, Bob, while we're on this one -- MR. MULHERE: Yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: -- that row on the very top part of the page closest to the parking spaces, that's a hedge row, if I'm not mistaken. MR. MULHERE: Correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. That hedge row will be established and maintained at a certain height according to our code. MR. MULHERE: Yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Which would indicate that it would be difficult to walk through it. MR. MULHERE: Correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. MR. MULHERE: And there will be trees. And that --and just as a point of information, that pathway actually meanders in a couple of places. There's a very large cypress tree in one location, and we -- down to the south part there, and we will be putting our landscaping on both sides of that pathway in order to meet the code provisions and retain that large cypress tree that exists where that sidewalk sort of jogs a little bit. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: So if someone wanted to access your parking area from that sidewalk, about the only place they could do it is the furthest south side without having to walk through a hedge? MR. MULHERE: Correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Is there enough room between that point of the sidewalk and the travel lane for your parking to fit a hedge in; do you know? MR. MULHERE: I don't know, but we could certainly look at that. I don't know. It looks pretty tight right there. The other landscape exhibit along our west and north boundary, we've enhanced this by providing -- I'm just going to go right off the exhibit here so I don't -- there'll be canopy trees 25-foot on center. The installed size will be 14 to 16 feet, and then also a single hedge row, 4 foot on center. Installed size will be 10 gallons or 48 inches. The reason for using the largest specimen sizes is so that it has more maturity quicker. Grows quicker, creates more opacity. It's required by code to achieve 80 percent opacity within one year, but this should happen faster using larger specimen sizes. Then we're proposing to install a 6-foot privacy fence, and then on the church side -- so most -- all of the -- not only all of the required landscaping but also more than the required landscaping will be provided for on the residential side of the fence and will be our responsibility for installing it and maintaining it. It's our property. On the church side we are proposing to do a hedge, but that's really just an anesthetic benefit for the church, for the parishioners. So I really think that, you know, the church was sensitive to the concerns the folks had with respect to being impacted by lights, by -- and, again, there aren't really all that many activities that would even occur at night, but car lights, and also what they would see from there. There is an existing wooden fence that's located a little bit towards the south on the property, and we'll evaluate the condition of that. That may need to be replaced as well. I don't know what the condition -- we'll look at the condition of that, obviously, as we go through, because there's going to be some changes. If you could go back to the site plan for one moment. You can also see that there's a fairly wide area between the drive aisle on the west side and the property line and that there's no parking directly facing the residential property on the west. There is a drainage element there, and then the landscape buffer. So you Page 5 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting have a minimum, I believe, of 40 feet within that area separating the drive aisle and the property line and no direct parking in that area. To the north there are a few spaces, but relatively few. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: So on this plan, for the benefit of the audience, the only place the cars will be parked are in those what look like dotted areas in between the travel lanes and the few areas to the east and the few to the north; is that right? MR. MULHERE: Correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: So you're not going to have any parking to the west of that furthest west side travel lane? MR. MULHERE: That's correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. MR. MULHERE: Over the years -- there's a number of churches in Collier County. Over the years the churches have expanded their parking facilities when their congregations have grown. Churches have and are allowed in residential districts through the conditional -use process or the PUD process. And they generally tend to be, you know, good neighbors. And over the period of time that the county has evolved at looking at these issues, the code has been strengthened and enforced to protect the residential neighbors when a church expands or locates, hence the public -hearing process. And I think we've been sensitive to that. We've provided, I think, a very good plan that minimizes any impacts on the neighbors that incorporates the existing conditions, including the pathway along the canal there. On the other side of the canal is mobile home zoning. There's a lot of storage along there, along the canal of boats and mobile homes and things -- motor homes and things like that. Really, I think that concludes my presentation, but I'm happy to answer any questions that might come up now, and I'd like to reserve a little bit of time for rebuttal, if necessary. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Absolutely. And what I'll do, Bob, is walk through my notes to see if there's anything that you have not answered. The first one I had noted was the fence that you had committed -- that was discussed at the neighborhood information meeting. Several of the attendees at that meeting had requested that the fence be continued. You've agreed with that, from what I understand at today's meeting. The exhibits -- and those exhibits, you brought copies for the court reporter? MR. MULHERE: I did, and I just delivered them. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. We'd like to --I'll make those two exhibits Exhibit C, those two pages. As far as the "no parking" signs go, I know you've agreed to add some of those. What is the process --and if you don't know, maybe staff can tell me --to get those installed? And the reason I'm asking is twofold. I want to make sure that it can be done because we're talking other locations off site of your property and, number two, that all the effort to get that done is going to be the responsibility of your applicant. MR. Nf LI ARE: Yes. So here's how I understand it, and you can correct me if I'm wrong, Mike. We, the church, will need to pay for the signs, which are constructed/prepared by Road and Bridge, county Road and Bridge Department, and then there may need to be a permit, a right-of-way permit to install the signs. There may not be because they would be, you know, traffic signs, so they may just allow you to install -- they would install them, too, I think. If we need to install them, we will, but I think Road and Bridge would install them, but we need to pay for the signs. I think at the same time there would be a benefit to us having a discussion or meeting with the sheriffs Traffic Operations Department to discuss the concerns the neighbors have with parking within the right-of-way associated with church activities. That, then, becomes an enforcement issue, and nobody wants to give a ticket to somebody on a Sunday. But along Rattlesnake Hammock, certainly -- and it can be a dangerous condition -- we're going to have additional parking. We'd want -- and we always -- the church also went -- during busy times, out of pure safety, does hire deputies to direct traffic during the masses. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: All of this additional parking, how many spaces are going -- do you believe are going to be fitted in here in addition to what you already have? MR. MULHERE: Oh, that's a good question. I'm going to defer to George on that. Page 6 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting MR. HERMANSON: Good morning. George Hermanson, Hole Montes. We're finishing the final plans, but they're going to net, I'm going to say, between 150 and 160 new spaces from this. The reason I'm not sure exactly is we're going to have to adjust some of the parking in the existing campus, too, due to some building construction and the fact that we have to add some more disability access parking spaces to the entire lot because of our increase in count, so -- but between 150 and 160 probably. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. And for those times when you have that excess parking that overflows and parks, potentially problematically, on Rattlesnake or other roads in the area, how often does that occur? And will this be -- this area will be open to utilize -- MR. MULHERE: Yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: -- during those periods as well? MR. MULHERE: Yes. That's really the purpose of this parking. Because it's the most remote from the actual church -- I mean, let's face it; folks don't park far away. Maybe if they had a really nice new car or something, I don't know. But most folks don't park really far away to walk. They're going to park wherever is closest. So it's only when the parking demand is the greatest. The parking demand is the greatest during season, for certain masses in particular, and then on certain holidays or holy days. You know, obviously you've heard stories, you know, Christmas, Easter, those kinds of masses are the busiest. So, you know, there's a few times a year when the demand is going to be the greatest. But in season, there will be demand. It's significant, and this parking will help. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. I'll make sure -- let me see if I have any other questions before we go to a staff report. In regards to the easements that are in place, I notice as the survey -- I think it was that particular document. MR. MULHERE: Yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: The facilities that are already there are being moved over to the east side of the property? MR. MULHERE: Correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Are the easements being modified as your -- MR. MULHERE: Yes. The portion of the easement that now will have parking and landscaping will be vacated, that easement that runs along the top there, and a new easement that is limited to the new location. I have an exhibit, but I know you can't -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Unfortunately we don't have the ability to show that. MR. MULHERE: But there will be a new easement established for the new location of the pump station. And just so everyone understands, this was something that county utilities was working on before we actually started to look at designing the additional parking area. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: And I will ask the staff as well when we get to the staff report, but from your perspective, has your group at all approached the Utility Department to confirm that the easements in the locations that you're depicting on the new layout are going to be acceptable to them? MR. MULHERE: I know George had -- yeah, had talked to them. MR. HERMANSON: The answer is yes. We've been coordinating with them from the very beginning. We had kind of an initial meeting and decided generally where the facilities would be, where the new piping would be, what easements could be vacated, and we've been working directly with Stantec who -- Stantec is designing the new station. So when we get to submitting our SDP, we will submit their plans with our plans, and it will all be approved at once. And we'll work out the exact location of all the new easements and be able to vacate the easements that they no longer need. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. And as far as access to this new facility when it's relocated, how are they currently obtaining access, and how will they continue to obtain access? MR. HERMANSON: Well, we're going to provide access through the parking lot if they need it. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: So you'd be willing to give the county right of access through the property if you need to? MR. HERMANSON: Yes. Whatever they need we've agreed to give them. Page 7 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Thank you. Bob, do you have anything else you want to add at this time? And you will have a chance for rebuttal, yes. MR. MULHERE: Thank you. No, I'm good. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. With that, at this point I'll turn to staff for a staff report. Mike? MR. SAWYER: For the record, Mike Sawyer, Project Manager for the petition. You've got staff report; date on that would be 5/26/15. Staff would like to rectify a couple of issues with the staff report and apologize for this. On Page 5 under the Transportation Element, that particular statement was, unfortunately, boilerplate, for lack of a better term, from previous conditional uses and indicates that a TIS was done and reviewed. It was not simply because the petition is not requesting any additional new trips. There are no new seats related to the church being proposed. So no new uses, therefore, transportation staff looked at this as no net additional trips. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. So from this perspective, from the church's use or from the property use, this is generating no new capacity for the system? MR. SAWYER: Correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. MR. SAWYER: Also on Page 6, what we've got under the Analysis No. 2 as far as ingress/egress, that particular statement related to transportation is much more applicable in this case. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. MR. SAWYER: And then moving on to -- hang on -- Page 7, under the County Attorney's Office review we indicate that the County Attorney has not reviewed the staff report, and they, in fact, did. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. I would like to make it clear in the future if a report comes to this level of presentation and processing, unless the County Attorney's Office reviews it, it will be continued until I have a report that says they've reviewed it. So I don't know how these things happen. Because I did check with the County Attorney's Office, I did learn that they had reviewed it, but I want to make sure the record is accurate, and we need to make sure from now on that we don't even process it until that statement's rectified. MR. SAWYER: Yeah, I apologize. This actually happened one other occurrence, and I've since changed my template. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: As far as the "no parking" signs, Mike, are you in agreement with the applicant's process, how he believes he's going to be able to get these placed and installed? MR. SAWYER: Yeah. The signs would be done as part of the Site Development Plan amendment that would be required to implement the parking area, and it would go through the right-of-way permitting process with our Transportation Department. They are now here with us in this building and are actually integral to the SDP process itself. So whatever's going to be necessary and whatever the county will allow as far as those signs will be done. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Thank you. The next part of this meeting will be to hear from the members of the public who would like to speak. Now, it caught me by surprise this morning. Until today the only known concerns that my office has understood to be part of this is what was read from the NIM minutes that many of you may have attended. I had not received any emails nor have I received any letters objecting to this project or raising any concerns. I had asked the applicant before today's meeting to try to address the issues brought up at the neighborhood information meeting. What they have proposed here, from their perspective, does address some of that. I'm anxious to hear from the public's perspective what your concerns are. So we're going to start out with what are called the registered public speakers, those that have filled out the speaker slip; however, I will, at the end of that, ask for anybody else that would like to speak. I'm here to listen to you and hear what you've got to say, so no one's going to be denied the ability to speak. The only thing I'd ask is that we get your name and address and information on the speaker slip before Page 8 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting you leave today. And those are available -- Gail, where are those located, in the back -- on the back table. So that would be helpful if we have to keep in contact. With that, will the first speaker who is called please come up to the microphone, identify yourself for the record, and I'd like to hear what you've got to say. MR. BELLOWS: The first speaker is Chris Thornton. MR. THORNTON: Good morning. For the record, I'm Chris Thorton with Goede, Adamczyk, Deboest, & Cross at 8950 Fontana Del Sol Way, First Floor, in Naples, and I'm representing Lely Villas 1 Condominium Association, Incorporated, today. I'm joined with --joined by Anna Taylor, the association president, and several members of the association. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Show me -- I'm sorry to interrupt, Chris. Can you show me or explain where they're located in relationship to the site? MR. THORNTON: Yes, sir. Immediately west of the subject site highlighted in orange where the yellow words "subject site" are. Those are 71 -- no, those are 65 single-family homes built in 1971 that are condominiumized as a condominium association. So they share their -- the association's eastern boundary is the western boundary of the subject property. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you. MR. THORNTON: And I will apologize for our late involvement. I appreciate you speaking to me this morning. Condo and HOA associations don't always act as fast as individual property owners can, but this association has asked our firm to represent them here today and get their comments on the record. They do object to the application. They would prefer that it not be approved. And it's nothing against religion or Catholicism. It's just a residential neighborhood adjacent to a use like this is from the neighbor -- from the perspective of these neighbors, it's not always been a great relationship. It's particularly -- the two main issues that I've heard about are lighting, the existing lighting, and we don't know about any proposed lighting. I didn't hear discussion of proposed lighting. But the existing lighting is a bother and a nuisance to some of those homes that are extremely close to that boundary on the existing site. The second concern is basically noise. Kids, people, people going to church. It's just loud. I mean, people are -- it's very close. So the people live right next to the church and, basically, lighting and noise are their concerns. And in your -- I know that church is a list -- is on the list of conditional uses for the ag property, but to get a conditional use you have to satisfy the criteria for a conditional use, and one of them is the affect the conditional uses will have on neighboring properties in relation to noise, glare, economic impact, and odor; that's C. And D is the proposed use's compatibility with adjacent properties. Churches have to go somewhere, I know that. This one is extremely close to these single-family homes. I do appreciate and support all of the conditions that have been imposed. The landscape buffer, the fence, the fact that the far western drive aisle doesn't have parking to its west. Those are all good things. The association would ask if it is going to be approved, that instead of a fence, there be an 8-foot concrete block wall and not only on the new site but on the old site, too, the entire length of the western and northern boundary of the church site, but not on Hawaii Boulevard, just adjacent to the residential homes, and then that all lighting, either proposed or existing, be screened so that it's not shining on these residential homes. I think there was a mention of an old fence that might need to be repaired. I believe that fence belongs to the condo association. And that's -- I think the 8-foot wall would address noise issues, and it would definitely address any lighting issues from the cars. It would not address the screening of the lights on the poles which are apparently a long-term problem that have been bothersome, especially to the people in that little nook that's tucked into the church property. But those homes have a lot of light and noise. I'm available for questions if you have any, and I appreciate you listening to the neighbor's concerns. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Chris, there may be some follow-up questions. Like I said in the beginning, you've caught me a little bit by surprise. Till last night when I got a phone call from the Page 9 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting applicant that you were hired and there's some organized opposition, it didn't appear there really was any more than what the NIM had said. So we'll do our best to work through this today, and we'll see where it goes. MR. THORNTON: Thank you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I sure appreciate it. Thank you. Next speaker, Ray? MR. BELLOWS: The next speaker is John Hansen. MR. HANSEN: My name is John Hansen, and I live at 13 Lanai, which is directly behind Area A there. As you can kind of see -- I mean, I know I have five minutes. I can go on -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I'm here to listen, so I want to hear what you've got to say, sir. MR. HANSEN: I'm a small business owner. I've been in business for 40 years. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Could you pull those mikes a little -- there you go. They don't pick up too well, so... MR. HANSEN: To give you a little background on me, I'm a small business owner. I've been in business for 40 years. I'm used to dealing with the public. I'm used to dealing with consumers, and I understand dollars and cents make a lot of things move and shake. We're a recent homeowner in Naples. If you look at this area, I can see the existing church area. They tried to protect some of the trees and the green space with their existing parking lots and what they have going there. If you look at that aerial view right now, that's the only major green space in that whole surrounding area. And for Naples to not be a concrete jungle like LA is, you have to protect those things, and just by placing a couple more trees in there is really not going to do that. The second issue is they could possibly take their existing parking lot area, redesign that. That's going to give them their 150, 160 extra spaces. That's still not going to eliminate their egress coming to and from the church. They've got one main driveway that is a constant bottleneck of people trying to get in, get out, get into all the side streets. So there's not enough access routes for the church property as it is. There's wildlife there. There's bald eagles that are there. There's turtles. I have some pictures I could submit as well as a letter from my neighbor that wasn't able to attend. And we actually submitted another letter January 2015 to Hole Montes disputing this and the future Naples growth patterns of what they want to see in Naples, and we got no reply, no response, no nothing. So I'm surprised you never heard anything, because we actually copied you, the city, and sent a letter also to you and to our existing -- previous board members. So somethings fall through the cracks, I understand that. Maybe it was just overlooked. And it is what it is. But dollars -and -cents -wise, the church looking to expand here -- it's all seasonal people. I'm here in season. I see the people coming, going. Every plate in there is Ohio, it's Michigan, it's Wisconsin. They're gone now. These are big funders. They're big donors. And if you turn this into a parking lot right now, what's going to happen is that 150, you know, 160 people, you know, lot, these people are going to have a hard time getting back there, they're not going to want to go in there. There's existing parking lots at the stores there that are almost vacant. They could put parking over there and take a shuttle bus and run people back and forth and still not have to touch that. But if you -- push comes to shove, let's say you expand that and you put the 150, 160 parking spots in there, these people coming to Naples -- and everybody's coming from up north, I'll tell you -- that's going to only buy them a year or two of parking spots before that church is way over capacity, if it isn't over capacity now. So you tear out all these trees, you ruin the wildlife, you have this parking lot for two years. Eventually, nobody's going to be using it because you can't sustain the church, the members for that size property. There's plenty of available space east of Naples. That's where everything is growing. They could buy a large -- take their money, buy a large property, large parking lot, put it out there, build it so it can sustain that church for the next 15, 20, 30, 40 years. This is not going to do that. If -- we talked about the concrete walls. Living behind that space there, I hear the lawn service in there Page 10 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting with their weed wackers. I hear them, you know, talking and, you know, just all of that. A concrete wall is the only acceptable thing that -- if you're going to do that, you're going to do it. And I understand, you know, the church has a lot of money, the people coming has a lot of money. The city's going to try and work with everybody, and we understand that. And, you know, I reject that plan. If you walk back there and saw how natural the wildlife was, that's one thing. One of my other neighbors -- not that this has anything to do with it, but during the recession there was a homeless vet living back in there, and he's been living there probably up until people started surveying that property. Where's he going to go? Well, he needs help; I understand that. But there's multiple reasons why this should not be, and probably first and foremost is it's too close to a residential neighborhood. It's not going to support and sustain the church, the parking lot, and the members for more than a couple years, and anybody that says otherwise, I can't see that. So I'm free for any questions if anybody has anything for me, and I would like to submit these papers or pictures, you know, if somebody would like those. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I'd like to see them before you do, please. I'll have to ask you to go back to the mike to speak. The first one is a handwritten note. I can't read the signature, but -- MR. HANSEN: That's my neighbor, Ted Gains. He lives right at 14 Lanai. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. And I believe there's three pictures or -- MR. HANSEN: Correct. Those are pictures of the bald eagles that are right behind, up in the trees there, and that was a mother and a father and the baby. I don't know what they call the baby eagle. But basically they're up there training their baby to fish in that canal right back there. And obviously they don't have a nest there that I can see so far, but obviously they're there because it's a great area for them to be. And if you -- and, again, if you start alternating the trees, the existing trees, the old growth, they're probably going to go somewhere else. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: And I will get these added to the record. MR. HANSEN: Okay. Thank you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I will have questions of the applicant before we finish today because of some of this, so thank you. I appreciate it. MR. HANSEN: Okay. Thank you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Ray, next speaker, please. MR. BELLOWS: Deacon Forrest Wallace. DEACON WALLACE: Good morning. I'm Deacon Forrest Wallace. I'm the operations manager at St. Peter, the Apostle, Catholic Church. I appreciate the opportunity to address you. I'd like everyone to smile today because it is the 41 st anniversary of St. Peter, the Apostle, parish. This started as a mission in 1955, and for 41 years we've been here. And so it's an --interesting today to have the anniversary today for us. And we've always striven to be a good neighbor and to be a good citizen. You see a small contingent of our parishioners. We are a larger parish, a very active parish here in the Diocese of Venice that has been serving the community, essentially a community now of 7,500 families in season and out. Our seasonal residents come in, and they're welcomed, and they're made to feel at home here at St. Peter's, but we've been growing along with Collier County for the last 41 years. So it's not a secret. We haven't been hiding there. We've been here for 41 years. We've been attempting to meet the needs of the growth that we're experiencing here in Collier County. If you look at the staff report, it indicates that at some point there'll be 12,000 more Catholics here nearby within four miles at some point in time. And so, in an effort to accommodate that, we're trying to use our property, which has been planned and owned for a number of years, to put in additional parking. And as I've heard some of the speakers talk about, it's not used all the time. In season here in Collier County, as you know, we get a crush of people who want to be here because it's wonderful to live here in Collier County. And so the plan for that property is not news, and the fact that we're there for the neighborhood isn't news. We've been here. And many of the people in Lely Villas I are parishioners. We actually own a house Page 11 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting in Lely Villas 1. The census data that's provided to us has indicated that 12,000 more Catholics are coming our way in all likelihood, but now, as you all know, Isles at Collier Preserve, the other -- Treviso Bay, we get new parishioners all through the year, not just during season. But we have new parishioners every week who come and sign up. We have 50 active ministries. It's an interesting physical plan to operate. I provided photos for the staff report that indicate all of that parking gets used, but it doesn't get used every day all the time. This is an occasional -use environment. It's not a 24-hour CVS. And so we have some -- we have high times, low times all throughout the year, and so there's a lot of times when that parking lot will just be getting cut. But it will get used, and I do have -- we've seen photographs of people walking. Believe me, they wear me out when I'm out in the parking lot and say I'm walking too far. The point of the commentary is we've planned for this property to do this to accommodate the growth of Collier County. We've been a good citizen. We want to be a good neighbor. And so I'm hoping that we'll -- that you'll approve our conditional -- the contingent use of this, and I thank you for your opportunity to address you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Before you leave, I do have a couple questions since you are the operations -- DEACON WALLACE: Yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: -- individual for the church. The lighting that has been a source of complaint you've heard today, usually we look at cutoff shields and recessed lighting so that lighting doesn't spill over onto neighboring properties. DEACON WALLACE: Okay. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: And maybe Bob -- I see him rise. Maybe he can better answer this. Is your lighting designed in the manner that doesn't protect the neighboring properties in that regard? DEACON WALLACE: It shuts off every night at 9 o'clock. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. But in the meantime, Bob, do you know if the cutoffs are there? MR. MULHERE: Well, I don't know, because I did go out and look at the lighting, and it's older. I mean, it's been there a long time. I don't think there's any problem with any new -- first of all, we're required by code to shield the lighting, and we can employ the dark -star -- dark -sky lighting standards, and we can look at retrofitting. If there's any lights that aren't shielded that are providing -- that are spilling onto the neighboring property, that wouldn't be a problem either. We can retrofit. It's not a problem. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: So is it fair to say that you're willing to apply the dark -sky lighting standards for any lighting that is adjacent to, say, within -- well, what we're using for commercial -- some commercial applications within 50 feet -- MR. MULHERE: Yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: -- of adjoining residential properties? MR. MULHERE: Yes. That would be the west and the north. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: And the reason I want to understand that is that would be -- that would apply to both the potential parking lot you're asking for today, and you're going to go back and look and retrofit the existing facilities if they need it. MR. MULHERE: There's only a couple lights. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I mean, it's a provision in the code anyway. So it needs to be verified and corrected if that's -- and it seems to be a complaint that needs to be addressed. MR. MULHERE: Shielding of the existing lighting fixtures if they're spilling onto the neighbors is not -- is not difficult to do. We'll do that. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. And, Bob, the gentleman gave me a letter that was sent to you on January 20th. I did double-check, and it's not in the 96 pages of information supplied to me by county staff. Can you tell me why we didn't have this letter? I mean, it is an important letter. It would have been an important consideration in understanding the process here today, so I'm disappointed it was not Page 12 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting received -- MR. MULHERE: My assumption was that it was also copied to the county staff. Typically that's -- when the letter is sent out, that's -- you know, they receive the -- you know, so I didn't think I needed to duplicate that effort. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: You're right. It does say CC: Collier County conditional -use petition department, so the assumption would have been it made it to the staff department. MR. MULHERE: Yeah. Otherwise, I would have sent it over, but -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Unfortunately, we assign planners, and if the planners don't receive it, I'm not sure where it goes in this large building. But it would have been helpful to have that earlier. MR. MULHERE: I had some other, but I'll wait until everyone's finished. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I've got other things to talk to you about as well. I wanted to follow up. Thank you very much, sir. DEACON WALLACE: All right. Thank you very much. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: One more question, though, about the noise. What is the source of the noise? How is this -- I mean, I understand from the gentleman -- DEACON WALLACE: I'm interested to find out. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. DEACON WALLACE: We have prayer groups that go into the hall that would be at that end of the property, so I'm kind of interested to find out what the noise issues are. We're a bunch of Catholics. We sing, you know; that's about it. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: You sing indoors, though? DEACON WALLACE: We may not sing well, but -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: No. But it's inside in the building? DEACON WALLACE: Yeah. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Yeah. Well, that's what I'm saying. DEACON WALLACE: Occasionally we may have some people practicing outside the hall but, I mean, it's going to be not too many voices. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: When do your nighttime operations cease? DEACON WALLACE: Everything shuts off at nine. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: And there's no exception to that? DEACON WALLACE: No. We have someone who goes around and locks the building at nine. MR. MULHERE: Except maybe potentially like midnight mass, which I don't know whether they have midnight mass at nine like Marco, but, you know, I don't know. DEACON WALLACE: No, actually we -- except on certain holy days -- and thanks for pointing that out, Bob. And I expect to see you there next time. But we will have some all-night vigils occasionally, but they're not going to be outside by any means. It will be inside the buildings, but we do have midnight masses for high holy days. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. So with the exception of those special masses which don't occur on a regular and continuing basis -- DEACON WALLACE: Correct, correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: -- you would stipulate that basically your activities stop at 9 o'clock with the exception of the locking up and -- DEACON WALLACE: With some odd exceptions, we have staff who lock the building at nine and set the alarm. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. DEACON WALLACE: That's what we do. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. DEACON WALLACE: Okay. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Appreciate it. Thank you. DEACON WALLACE: Thank you very much. I appreciate this. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Ray, would you want to call the next speaker? Page 13 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting MR. BELLOWS: The last speaker is Bill Schreck. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Well, Bill, I've gotten to see two people I haven't seen for quite sometime. One is Chris Thornton, and today it's you. It's been a while. MR. SCHRECK: Good seeing you, Mark. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Good to see you. MR. SCHRECK: Thank you for letting us have the opportunity to speak here today. I've been here a longtime. I've been here since '73, and I've been in the construction business for 40 years here plus 10 up in Cleveland. As a member of the parish and being on the building committee and looking over what we're doing, there's things on the site pointed out by one gentleman, we are working on the SDP to get the flow of the traffic so it will work better when it comes in with our new SDP on the new project, because this site is needed, and it will help the situation tremendously of people illegally parking. You can say it is going to be noisy. Well, I don't think so. Back in there -- during regular season, very few people are going to park back there, and during season it is needed desperately. When you have nine masses and maybe 10 masses on an Easter and Christmas and you've got to get those people in and out of there and you're hiring the Sheriffs Department and you're trying to keep the neighbors happy by not having the streets filled with cars -- because Catholics have the obligation to go to those masses, and they're going to go to the best place they can find where they're living. One of the things that was pointed out, Catholics are rich. This is the poorest parish in the Diocese. We have Anglos, Spanish, and Haitian all using this facility, all coming to do what they do to worship their Lord. The point is, it is needed. And I would really think that by not letting it happen, you're going to be turning people away, and that's not what we want to do. That's all I have to say. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Appreciate your comments. Thank you. We're going to go to any public speakers who have not registered but would like to speak. Anybody? Yes, sir. Come on up. Please identify yourself, and if you could fill out a slip before you leave, that would be greatly appreciated. MR. BRILL: Thank you. My name's Robert Brill. I live at 39 Lanai Circle, adjacent to the property here. And they were talking about the noise, that it doesn't happen after 9 o'clock at night. There is a couple of bands that practice over there in the evening. Sometimes they're done at nine, sometimes they're not done at nine. It has nothing to do with the church being open or locked. They're not inside the church. They're in the parking lot. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: A couple of bands. You mean people playing instruments? MR. BRILL: I know John Phillips Sousa very well. I didn't know him that well when I was in high school, but I hear him all the time. And they practice their marching bands. They practice their instruments. They're very loud. They're very noisy, yep. It's usually only one or two days a week, but it's during season, and it's not during season. And for the church to say that there's nobody over there is just --I mean, that's just wrong. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I appreciate your -- MR. BRUGGER: The noise is there. They're there all the time. I haven't heard anybody mention the parking situation on Hawaii. When they park out there, because they don't want to park across the street or anyplace else, that's a horrible hazard. I'm amazed there hasn't been more people hurt coming in and out of our subdivision because we can't see because of all the cars that are parked on Hawaii Boulevard and on the median. They talk about putting up some parking signs, then they say, well, they're going to put them on Rattlesnake. Well, nobody parks on Rattlesnake. They park on Hawaii. Hawaii is where the big problem is. A short time ago, right at Hawaii and Rattlesnake, a pedestrian got killed because somebody was in a hurry to get out of church or into church right at that parking lot. And there's close -calls there all the time. People in my subdivision try not to go out on Sunday, and people in our subdivision shouldn't have to Page 14 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting do that, you know. We can't get out. We can't see. It's not safe. Anybody that has children, it's a bad situation. And, yep, it's only one day a week, but it's only one day a week it shouldn't happen. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Appreciate your comments, sir. MR. BRILL: Thank you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: If anybody else would like to speak. Yes, sir, come on up. Please identify yourself for the microphone, and on your way out, if you don't mind filling out a slip, that would be helpful. MR. REYNOLDS: My name is David Reynolds. Our address is 10 Lanai Circle. Our property abuts up directly to the adjacent property that we're talking about. We've owned the property therefor 10 years. We also have no issue with the church or the situation. Our issue is, as I brought up at the conditional meeting that we had -- which we are thankful that they have a neighborhood meeting. We were able to voice our concerns. Our concern was not the institution of new parking but the utilization of the current parking that was being used. I asked if any parking surveys had been done. None had been done. I asked if any -- if it was required that the amount of spaces where the people -- the seats in the church, parking, there's a ratio of number of parking spots you needed in order to accommodate your parishioners. That's already being accommodated by the current number of spaces. Our issue is -- the area's, obviously, issue -- is zoned agricultural for a reason and has been. And the gentleman's response was everything was zoned agriculture at one point in time, which I understand that as well. We -- I have two questions, and they weren't answered at the previous meeting and haven't been answered yet today. The question is, when was this -- everyone says for numerous years the church has owned this property, but no one has given us a date as to when the church actually bought that property. When we purchased the property in 2006, the church did not own that property behind the area there, and we're just -- I'm just wondering when that changed, and our concern is your gentleman had said that people tell him all the time, I don't like to walk this far to get to church. Well, people don't even use the spaces that are currently being used. People park on Hawaii Boulevard already. There are already signs that say "no parking" on Hawaii Boulevard, so those obviously are not working at this time. So my question is, we still have one entrance and one exit. We're adding a whole bunch more spaces for parishioners to go into the situation. But at the same time, we're not providing any exit points for people to getout. The issue is --what everyone says is, we can't get in, we can't get out of church, so now we're just going to jam more people back into an area where we have no exit spot and have no ability to get in and out of that area. They're not using the spots in season and out of season that are too far for them to walk. They're already parking on Hawaii Boulevard before the spaces are even being filled up in the current area. And our question is, there's only a few spots -- like my neighbor said, there's only a few spots left in Collier County within the immediate Collier County where there is some trees and wildlife. When the county built the thorough way, the greenway, they left a giant cypress tree. They actually put the path around the cypress tree. Our question is and my question is, is it possible -- I know this is, obviously, probably going to go through. My point is fruitless here, but is it -- is there ability to leave some of those cypresses there temporarily at least until you go into the rectory situation? I mean, these are hundred -year -old trees which we have very few left in the inner-city part of Naples. And my question is -- we're just going to bulldoze this whole area again, put in some parking spots that no one's going to use. We'll be back here in a couple years asking for more parking somewhere else that no one's going to use. And our question is, you know, why isn't -- why wasn't the proper steps taken during the season to say -- come to the neighbors and say, hey, listen, we've looked at our parking. Here's pictures of every single spot being used. Here's the overflow. Here's what we're doing. We've put in some parking Page 15 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting directors. We've tried to get some situations handled where people flow in and out a little bit better. We've hired the police to direct on the street. We've also implemented our own people to do that. I said, it mirrored my church. I'm a Catholic born and raised also. My wife is Presbyterian. They did a huge remodel in Lake Placid, Florida, where they closed a 40-spot place -- spot -place for parking where they had to redo it. They had people in yellow with signs and banners directing people where to park. None of that's ever been done. Nothing's ever been implemented in order to alleviate the problem currently without just going ahead and changing this over from agriculture, bull -zoning the trees, and putting down some parking lots. So although we did voice our opinion, they said that we may have another meeting prior to this meeting to let us know more about what the changes to the buffers and things like that are. You know, we appreciate the time. Our concern is just that, you know, we're wondering why this is the answer as opposed to other questions. That's it. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I did check, because part of the requirements for the package that I received from staff was the deeds on the property. MR. REYNOLDS: Okay. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: The deed was -- the one I have was dated March 10, 1999. MR. REYNOLDS: Okay. Great. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: So it was owned -- MR. REYNOLDS: Perfect. We just wondered how long they'd owned it. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. I appreciate your comments. Thank you. Anybody else that would like to speak on this matter? Okay. Ma'am, come on up. (The speaker was duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you. You need to state your name for the record. MS. NOLAN: My name is Ginny Nolan. I am the Director of Ministries at St. Peter's, and I've worked there for almost 25 years. I just --was in response to the band music the gentleman was hearing. I live in Flamingo Estates, which is over by East Naples Middle School off Davis Boulevard. We hear it also there. And we've been astounded, because Lely High School is so far away. But on a good night, you can hear it. It is not being done in our parking lot. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Ma'am, I appreciate your statement. I know the prior gentleman has a different opinion. And I think that needs -- that is something that can be addressed through what the prior gentleman said would be a limitation at 9 o'clock and that the only activities are going on inside building. We'll get that further defined, so thank you. Is there anybody else that wishes to speak? Yes, sir. Come on up. You'll have to be sworn in and then identify yourself for the record. And, Ms. Nolan, I'm sorry, could you please fill out a slip before you leave. It's in the back of the room. (The speaker was duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) MS. MERENDINO: My name is Joan Merendino. I'm a member of Lely Village 1. We had a meeting with the committee in November, at which point I asked them what was the current number of parking spaces, and they came up with a figure of 640. And then I said what was the current capacity of the church, which was 1,100. Now, a minimum of two people in a church -- in a car, you're already past the capacity for the church. It seems to me that they're talking about 12,000 more parishioners. It's not the parking they have to worry about; it's the church, because they are overloaded with people. I mean, you put more cars, you're not going to get less people; you're going to get more. Now, they have -- like I said, on Hawaii Boulevard, they park in the bike lane. The whole street is covered with the -- and the gentleman knows, you cannot get out of your driveway. You've got the bike lane and you've got the median. So parking more is not going to be problem. The problem is they need another church. Thank you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Appreciate your comments, ma'am. Thank you. Page 16 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting Is there anybody else that wishes to speak? Ma'am? (The speaker was duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) MS. BASHIRES: My name is Jan Bashires (phonetic). I live at 7 Lanai Circle, and I speak to the noise from the church. You must have a rec area where they can rent it out, and there are bands in there. My noise -- my windows rattle with the noise from the band. There are kids running all over the place yelling, screaming. In the summer they kick soccer balls out there. So it is -- it's very noisy. Thank you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you, ma'am. Is there anybody else that would like to speak? Ma'am, come on up. (The speaker was duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) MS. ALIA: My name is Michelle Alia. I live at 5023 Catalina Court. There's a lot of neighbors here from Lanai Circle that have spoken, and no one from my community, so I thought I'd say something. My neighbor is with me. She lives at 5019 Catalina Court, which is right where the red line is on the subject site, and my house is where the No. 3 is. I understand the problem of the growth in our community and everything as far as the church is concerned for their need for more parking. There is a lot of new developments going up, and a lot of Catholic parishioners need the Catholic church to provide the parking; I understand that. Most of the parking isn't being used, and even though it's not being used, people still park on Hawaii Boulevard. It's very dangerous when I go to work in the morning. My concern is the property values and also the -- just the noise itself and all the concerns that people here have already expressed. I just want to say that I support the community --the people that live on Lanai Circle for a wall, the concrete wall that they're asking for. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Thank you very much. Is there anybody else that would like to speak? (No response.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Bob, you've got a lot to respond to. I would certainly want you to consider the fact that not having received this letter, that was a problem. You've got some issues involving the existing operation, which have not been necessarily addressed by this conditional -use application that I think need to be considered, and so I'd sure like to get your input on that. You may want to also consider having time to try to work out some of these issues with your neighbors before a decision is rendered, but that's something that's up to you. MR. MULHERE: Well, I guess we can only work out something if someone's willing to work out something. If they're not willing to work out something, then we can't. We still have to make a decision. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: No. And I don't disagree with you, but if you've got issues with bands in the parking lot or -- MR. MULHERE: There's no bands playing in the parking lot. There may be bands playing inside the -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: We have testimony that is contrary to that, and so those things are concerning. So go ahead. MR. MULHERE: Okay. But let me ask you this then. The church says there's no bands. The folks say there are bands. I think the band -- there may be some music coming from the parish hall, which is an existing building located right, you know, in the aerial. That's what a parish hall is for is for activities. That -- 1974 that this St. Peter's has been there since. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I'm looking at property that -- the agricultural piece. It looks like -- the deed that's in the packet says that piece -- MR. MULHERE: Ninety-nine. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: That piece is what's the subject of this meeting today, not necessarily the whole -- MR. MULHERE: That's my point. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: -- operation. But because of the current way the other operation Page 17 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting is running, it's overflowing into the church from this agricultural piece. MR. MULHERE: So -- but I think we've committed to no activities beyond 9 p.m. except for those holidays that require us to, you know. So, I mean, I don't know exactly how to -- I mean, you have testimony that the church is closed down at 9 p.m.; the lights are shut off at 9 p.m. We've already agreed to look at adjusting the existing lighting with shielding to minimize or prohibit any flow onto adjacent residential properties. New lighting we'd do that for. The issue of parking on Hawaii, it's not logical to assume that providing additional on -site parking would not in some way be beneficial. Now, I do understand that, you know, some folks may choose to park on Hawaii because it's more convenient for them to get out after a church function, so they just disregard the fact that there's an impact on the neighbors. That can happen. The church can certainly talk to their parishioners and let them know. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: For my benefit, where is Hawaii specifically on this plan? MR. MULHERE: It's the road that runs off of Rattlesnake Hammock to the north so the church has that -- you know, it's where the actual access is to the church, and then runs -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: There it is. It's written in yellow. MR. MULHERE: Yes, yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I'm sorry. Okay. So that main Hawaii Boulevard is inundated with cars being parked along there and -- MR. MULHERE: That's what we're hearing. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Is that one of the locations -- MR. MULHERE: Yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: -- that the "no parking" signs are going to go? MR. MUL1 ERE: Yes, yes. And somebody said they already exist, and people don't pay attention. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Well -- but that's a matter of enforcement. MR. MULHERE: I know. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: When -- do you use deputies -- MR. MULHERE: Yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: -- to enforce traffic on busy days? MR. MULHERE: We -- no. Deputies are used to direct traffic on busy days. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Is there any communications that have been -- occurred with the Sheriffs Department from your client's perspective to actually go out and start ticketing people that are in violation of that law? MR. MULHERE: No. I don't think there's been any discussion of that. I mean, there's been discussion of directing traffic for safety purposes, and those deputies are paid for by the church when they come out there and do that. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Sir, we can't have any discussion from the audience, I'm sorry. MR. MULHERE: There's two deputies that direct traffic. I understand. I already put on the record we'd be happy to go and meet with the Sheriff s Office to talk about the enforcement issue. They need to step up to the plate as -- with respect to that. Certainly the neighborhood may have called the Sheriffs Office. I don't know. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. MR. MULHERE: You know, but I don't -- I don't disagree that a couple of tickets probably would have people thinking twice about parking out there and using the parking that we're proposing. A couple of other -- oh, I'm sorry. If you -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: How many access routes are there into this church property? MR. MULHERE: Two -- three, I'm sorry. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. As far as capacity of the church, I'll certainly ask staff to take a close review of what the church was allowed by the TIS that was issued, and they should not be exceeding that. Do you know the relationship between the amount of seats in that church and -- MR. MULHERE: I think that the statement is accurate. There's no issue -- this parking is not to address nonconformity. It is to address need. So there's no -- this is -- this would be additional parking above Page 18 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting and beyond what the code requires. There's reality and then there's the code. The reality is, if people -- in season the demand is exceeding what the LDC parking requirement calls for. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: But in the past, one of the things that is probably frustrating this whole situation is you were issued an administrative parking exemption for a reduction in parking, and that may be playing into somewhat of the problem that's now occurring since that was done years ago and the church has grown excessively since then. MR. MULHERE: I don't think it was tech -- I mean, we'll have to take a look at that. I don't know that it was a reduction. There's -- what it was was that the parking -- the exception allowed for the parking that's across the street to be counted towards the parking requirement. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: You're right. That's right. It was -- MR. MULHERE: It wasn't a reduction. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: -- an administrative parking decision, but it wasn't for a reduction. It was for a relocation. MR. MULHERE: Correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: You're right. MR. MULHERE: So, you know, there are issues that relate to enforcement of illegal parking, no question about it. And I don't think anyone is objecting to meeting with the Sheriffs Office to have a conversation about that. Perhaps -- perhaps some of the neighbors should also come with us when we go and meet with them. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Well, I think some neighborhood outreach would be highly beneficial based on what I heard today. MR. MULHERE: And I thought we went above and beyond the call of duty, because I can't recall another time where we sent out an email to everyone that was at the NIM and provided them with exhibits telling them what we were proposing to do. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Did you suggest to them you'd have a second meeting with them and that did not occur? MR. MULHERE: No. I think we might have said if necessary we'll -- I think we said we'd communicate with whatever changes we were going to make, and we thought we did that through that email that we sent out. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: What about salvaging some of the existing vegetation on that site? MR. MUL14ERE: The site's got to be filled. There's no way. I mean, the site has to be filled. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. MR. MULHERE: And, by the way, we did -- there was an environmental assessment done. There's no listed species on this site. You know, I'm not saying there's not a bald eagle using the tree, you know. MR. HERMANSON: George Hermanson. I wanted to address the -- you know, there was a listed species study done, and the agencies agreed that there was no habitat -- real habitat value. It's an urban area. The church paid for mitigation credits off site for the state and paid into the Collier Conservation Fund for the county requirements. So they paid for those -- for that ability to develop that property. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Thank you. MR. MULHERE: I'm just looking to see if there was any --the reference to growth, I just did want to take a moment. The Diocese is very, very -- I've worked for the Diocese on a number of projects over the years. They're very proactive. They have a very sophisticated process of looking at prospective growth. They do have other properties that they both own and that they are looking to acquire, out east and in other locations. They do a really good job addressing growth. This church isn't going away, and there's a lot of growth that's going to occur in the immediate area that is occurring, as was mentioned, Isles of Collier and other pretty large developments that are going to occur there that are in close proximity to this. This situation is going to get worse, not better, if we don't have the additional parking. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Anything else you want to add, Bob? Page 19 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting MR. MULHERE: No, thank you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay, thank you. Are there any further comments from staff? MR. SAWYER: No, but we're here to answer any questions. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Mike, do you know the capacity of the church at this time? Have you -- did you look at that at all in regards to the parking? MR. SAWYER: We did not look at that because, quite honestly, they weren't asking for any additional seats. It would definitely be part of the current SDP that will be reviewed. That is certainly something that staff will review. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: So any parking that they're allowed would have been set by the standard when this church was originally approved for the capacity at that time based on the SDP submittal for the building; is that accurate? MR. SAWYER: That is accurate, yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: And will staff be checking that capacity against the parking spaces total when this piece of property -- if this piece of property moves forward? MR. SAWYER: Yes. And it would be to current standards, not to the standards that would have been applied previously, if those standards have changed. I don't know. I kind of suspect that those standards haven't changed, but it would definitely be to the current standards. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: From staffs perspective, moving this parking on site, or creating this additional parking on site, would that change anything in regards to the off -site parking that has been approved administratively? Apparently there's another location which I was alluding to or discussed? That is still available; is it not? MR. SAWYER: That is still available and would still be enforced. MR. MULHERE: There's actually a parish hall; I'm not sure. I may have the term incorrect. But that's, like, offices. That's used, and the parking supports that use, but when there's masses occurring, its not used, so that parking can be used to support the church. That's -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Where is this location where this -- MR. MULHERE: It's almost directly across the street. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Well, once I know the general area, I'll be able to find it, so... Okay. I don't have any other questions. Mike? MR. SAWYER: I can show you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Would you mind? Thank you. Okay. So that's an accessory parking area for the church for overflow or whatever they want to use it for. Okay. So they are -- you are shuttling people, at least to the extent you can from that property? MR. MULHERE: There are actually -- that's why we have the deputies. They're actually crossing the street. That's one of the reasons the deputy is there. So during the week, that's used for other church -related functions as plenty of parking. When it's not -- on Sundays not in use for that purpose, that parking is used to support the church functions. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Thank you very much. Well, I've got no other questions at this point. I've got a lot of notes. There will be a decision rendered on this within 30 days. I do very much appreciate the input from everybody that has discussed and talked today. It will be very helpful in reviewing this project in more detail over the next period of time before a decision is written. I want to thank you all, and that's the end of this particular case for today. Thank you. With that, we're going to take a 10-minute break and come back at 10:25 and resume. (A brief recess was had.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Thank you. We'll resume the meeting. The next petition and final petition up for today is Petition No. SV-PL20140000590. It's Lotus Gunworks Naples, LLC, also known as the Alamo on Vanderbilt Beach Road extension, I believe, and the Walgreens PUD. Page 20 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting All those wishing to testify on behalf of this item, please rise to be sworn in by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Disclosures on my part, I've reviewed all the files, had numerous conversations with staff, talked to one of the gentlemen representing the applicant here this morning, and I did receive one letter of opposition from Mr. and Mrs. Degiorgio. I'm not sure I pronounced that right, but I have provided a copy of it to the court reporter for the record. They mostly expressed concern about the clutter of multiple signs in the area and wanted to be on record as opposing this. And with that is there anybody -- any members of the public here today to discuss this item? (No response.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Sir, if you'd mind coming to the microphone. You won't need to make a formal presentation. I have read the entire file and packet. I would just like you to identify yourself for the record. MR. SCOTT: My name is Jeffrey L. Scott. I'm an architect here in Naples, Florida, and I'm the applicant on this variance. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. There are some staff recommendations. Did you have any objection to those? lul =YK6101 E U[.a HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: And in reviewing your file, you're looking to add a monument sign on the Vanderbilt Beach Road extension side of the PUD? MR. SCOTT: Correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: That's in conflict in distance -wise with the two signs that they have currently, one on Airport Road and one on Vanderbilt Beach extension. MR. SCOTT: That's correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: And you also want to put a series of small signs, and I say "small" because they are less than the required sizes allowed on the front of the building, but you don't want them clustered together. You're moving them on different parts of the building. MR. SCOTT: The meat of the variance is to just take small signs but scatter them in four places across the front of the building. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. MR. SCOTT: That would be our road sign. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: These are your two -- this is your road sign in the reddish color. The two gold signs on each side are the ones that exist. And the distance that you need for the sign variance are, because of the proximity, then closer to 1,000 feet from the two road signs. MR. SCOTT: That's correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: This is the particular road sign, and it's -- this one says 45 square feet. I saw another one, I thought it was 57, but let's -- MR. SCOTT: It has been reduced from the first application a long time ago. We have made it smaller. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: It's 45 square feet. MR. SCOTT: Less than 45 square feet is the final sign size. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: The signs that go on the front of the building are these. This is the one that totals 57 square feet, and the reason this has become an issue is because the way staff has measured the signs on the front of the building don't coincide because of all the dead space in between the signs that's counted in because of the way it's measured. MR. SCOTT: They count the blank space on the wall as part of sign because they're spread so wide, yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. The way that staff is measuring it is in this way, and staffs relying on the language that says the signs would be measured through the measurement of regular geometric shapes. This is a regular -- this is what staff considers in line with that as a regular geometric shape. This is one that you had produced previously that would have been less than the 200 square feet allowed, but apparently you've now modified it to drop the -- Page 21 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting MR. SCOTT: Correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: -- put another line in there, which widened the non-signage space -- MR. SCOTT: That's correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: -- and caused the problem. I took a look at this. I read the code. I didn't know staffs manner of looking at it until I interpreted it myself. This is as regular to me as some of the other methods I've seen. Still we're connecting things with rectangles and squares. This would produce approximately less than 200 square feet, so this would have still not caused you to have to come in for a variance. So I think the reason you're here on this one is because you were coming in anyway, and rather than try to dispute the method of measurement, you guys are just going along saying, we're coming in, we'll take care of it. MR. SCOTT: Let's do a hearing and, yeah, put it up on the wall. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: The overall issue that is surprising -- and I think it needs to be noted for the record, the front wall signs, these here, could have been 200 square feet or less, and you would have met the code and you would have not had an issue. MR. SCOTT: Correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: If you'd taken the real size of these signs, which is really 57 square feet for the actual verbiage, not the dead space, and you add that to the monument sign you want out front at 45 feet, you're 105 square feet. You're still far less than the one massive sign you could put on the front of that building. MR. SCOTT: That's correct. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. And that's the comparison that I took a look at, and I appreciate your verifying that for me. Thank you. I don't have any questions on this because it's pretty straightforward, and there wasn't anything else other than the concern over the measurement. I understand staffs position and yours and now mine, so thank you very much, and I'll move to the staff for a staff report. Thank you. Nancy? MS. GUNDLACH: Good morning. For the record, Nancy Gundlach, principal planner with the zoning services. And staff is recommending approval subject to two recommendations. And would you like for me to read them for the record? HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Well, actually, I was going to ask you about the first one. It says six wall signs are limited to a maximum of 60 total square feet into the northern building facade facing towards Vanderbilt Beach Road. The second part of that I understand. The first part puzzles me. If they're limited to 60 total square feet but the measurement has got to be this, how does that work? MS. GUNDLACH: Unfortunately we do not have our sign expert here today to explain that to you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Wait a minute. If we're here because -- one of the reasons we're here is because this is the way to measure; and you're saying that to get those six real signs, which are four text and one emblem, into what is considered a sign area by our sign code -- and that's the purpose of the variance -- you can't say 60 feet if you're telling him he needs 313. I just want to make sure that in the recommendation from staff we're not boxing it into another problem, and you can clarify that later on with me. MS. GUNDLACH: Okay. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: We've got time to adjust that. But I want to make sure that if he needs this to say he's got 313 square feet to fit that outline in that we don't say it's 60. Because if you say 60,1 worry that someone's going to come back in and say, well, it's 60 for the text and for the emblem, but because of the connection by regular geometric shapes we can't get there, it's greater than that; you understand my point? MS. GUNDLACH: That might be valuable information to use, that these recommendations were Page 22 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting crafted with our sign expert. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: But your sign expert is the one that believes this is the only regular geometric shape that works, and I disagree with that. MR. BELLOWS: For the record, Ray Bellows, the manager with zoning services section. The 60 square feet reference in the staff report is text area, but I believe the request should include the 313 square feet so there won't be an issue with permitting. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. And that's what I was getting at. We will tie it to this graphic -- MR. SCOTT: Good. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: -- so that way you get this graphic. You don't get 313 feet of a giant sign. MR. SCOTT: She may have interpreted the 60 being greater than the 57 that I showed for the individual boxes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Yeah. They round it up; I agree with you. MR. SCOTT: Right, right. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. And I don't have any other questions on -- the permit number is going to be revised so as to be consistent with this variance. I'm sure that's fine. I don't have any other issues with the staff recommendations, and at this point I'm fine, so thank you very much. MR. SCOTT: Thank you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I asked earlier if there was any member of the public here. I don't see any that would want to speak on this, unless Fred wants to get up to talk. With that, we will close this -- Heidi, did you have -- MS. ASHTON-CICKO: Did you label your exhibits? I don't recall you saying that. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: I'm glad you brought that up. Thank you. Good point. Exhibit A will be the staff report, and Exhibit B will be the legal ad. I've already provided the court reporter, for the record, a copy of the letter that I received. And with that, we will close this hearing, and thank you very much for your time, sir. MR. SCOTT: Thank you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Probably within a --within a week or 10 days I'll have a decision to you, but I've got 30 days to do it in. It will be less. Thank you. MR. SCOTT: Thank you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: And with that, the next item on the agenda is old/new business or other business. There is none. There's no one here from the public for public comment, so that -- this meeting is adjourned. Thank you all. ******************** There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Hearing Examiner at 10:36 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER MARK STRAIN, HEARING EXAMINER Page 23 of 24 June 11, 2015 HEX Meeting ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK These minutes approved by the Hearing Examiner on , as presented or as corrected TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC. BY TERRI LEWIS, COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY PUBLIC Page 24 of 24 June 25, 2015 HEX Meeting TRANSCRIPT OF THE MEETING OF THE COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER Naples, Florida June 25, 2015 LET IT BE REMEMBERED, that the Collier County Hearing Examiner, in and for the County of Collier, having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 a.m., in REGULAR SESSION at 2800 North Horseshoe Drive, Room 609/610, Naples, Florida, with the following people present: HEARING EXAMINER MARK STRAIN Also Present: Heidi Ashton-Cicko, Managing Assistant County Attorney Ray Bellows, Zoning Manager Page 1 of 6 June 25, 2015 HEX Meeting EXHIBITS PAGE DESCRIPTION Item 4A - Petition No. BDE-PL20140002838 A - Staff Report B - Legal Advertisement Letter Dated June 15, 2015 by Richard and Kendra Maxwell Item 4B - Petition No. SV-PL20140002329 14 A - Staff Report 14 B - Legal Advertisement ************* PROCEEDINGS HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Good morning, everyone. Welcome to the Thursday, June 25th meeting of the Collier County Hearing Examiner. Would everybody please rise for the Pledge of Allegiance? (The Pledge of Allegiance was recited in unison.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: For some housekeeping matters, individual speakers will be limited to five minutes unless otherwise waived. Decisions are final unless appealed to the Board of County Commissioners and a decision will be rendered within 30 days. The review of the agenda for today is, we have two petitions. 4A is a petition for a boat dock extension on Isle of Capri, and 4B is for a sign addition variance at the Gregg Appliances. There are no changes to the agenda. Item 3 is the approval of prior meeting minutes. I have reviewed those. They are fine, to be recorded as -- as they stand and read, and that will bring us to our first advertised public hearing. And what I'll asking for first is there any members of the public here to discuss the Randy Sears boat dock extension on Isle of -- Isle of Capri. It's 164 Pago Pago. Okay. Kris, if you don't mind coming up to the podium? I have read the staff report in detail. I will not need a formal presentation unless you have things you want to add to the record. MR. THOEMKE: Not at this time, no. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. A couple of items. ***Exhibit A to this action, it is BDE-PL20140002838. Will all those wishing to testify on behalf of the subject, please rise and be sworn in by the court reporter. And that would be you, too, Kris. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you. THE COURT REPORTER: Can I have your full name, please? MR. THOEMKE: 239 -- THE COURT REPORTER: No, no. Your full -- your name, your full name. MR. THOEMKE: Oh, Kris, K-r-i-s, T-h-o-e-m-k-e. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Disclosures on my part. I've talked with staff, I've reviewed the files. I have one letter of objection from Richard and Kendra Maxwell, which I have given to the court reporter to add to the record. There are two exhibits that will be entered into the record. One is Exhibit A. It's the staff report. The second will be Exhibit B, the legal ad. Page 2 of 6 June 25, 2015 HEX Meeting And, Kris, what I've done is put some of the slides above, are from -- excerpts from the staff -- MR. THOEMKE: Right. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: -- report. And I -- there's one I want to particularly note out. I did have several questions for you since you -- you don't have anything to add, and I have read the staff report. And I won't need to get into things that the staff report generally talks about. There was a staff recommendation. Did you have any objection to that? It is concerning the fact you won't get a boat dock, that the permit has to coincide with a building permit. MR. THOEMKE: The building -- they have -- I believe they have the building permit number. I'm not sure if they actually have the permit issued -- HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Yeah. MR. THOEMKE: -- but he understands that, yes. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. I also noticed that you were taking out the rip rap that is currently there? MR. THOEMKE: Yeah. That has been done and the seawall has been put in place already. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: The only question I have on the remainder of your packet is -- has to do with this particular detail. Do you see where you have your 15-foot sign setback -- MR. THOEMKE: Yeah. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: -- and the line comes down and splits the piling? I believe the 15 feet has to go to the outside of the piling. And I'll ask staff to confirm or tell me differently. Mike? MR. SAWYER: Yes. For the record, Mike Sawyer, Project Manager for the petition. It's our understanding that the pilings themselves will be part of the boat dock facility itself; so, therefore, it would have to be on the inside of that. And, I apologize. Staff did not catch that as part of our review. MR. THOEMKE: We can -- we can revise that drawing. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: As such, I'm going to ask you. Do you have any objection to that? MR. THOEMKE: No. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. MR. THOEMKE: That's easy enough to do. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: What I will need from you is a revised exhibit that you have here just with that correction made to it. MR. THOEMKE: Yep. I'll get that to you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Just checking to see if I had anything else. The one letter of objection, I'll read the three points that they made and ask for staff comment. The first point was that they were concerned that this would set a precedent that would allow others around the bay to do so, appreciably changing the bay for the worst. Obviously the last few line -- few words are their opinion. But from your research, Mike, and then the crafter line, Kris, did you find other similar configurations in this bay area already existing? MR. SAWYER: Yeah. We -- we actually measured out with the Property Appraiser's website. The dock that's just immediately -- or basically north and east of this, actually comes out -- we measured it at about 41 feet, which is pretty comparable to this. I believe there are also a couple of other docks that have a similar projection out into this particular waterline. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. And, Kris, I think this was done by your office? MR. THOEMKE: Yeah, I did that. And once again, this is off the Property Appraiser's website. Page 3 of 6 June 25, 2015 HEX Meeting And I concur with what Mike said. I measured it at 40. And also the one to the southwest there on the angle, that one also measured out to right around 40 feet, plus or minus, with the accuracy of the aerial there. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Thank you. One of the other points that the objection letter noted was that it would negatively affect their property values as their views of the waterways would be affected. Heidi, excuse me. MS. ASHTON-CICKO: I'm sorry. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Mike, did you have any information concerning property values submitted to your office? MR. SAWYER: No. Nothing as far as property values and, quite honestly, it does come up periodically that, you know, people perceive that there is a property value change. That usually occurs with any kind of selling petition that might even come through our offices. But, no, we did not receive anything like that. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Kris, the value of this dock facility and, potentially, the boat that's going to be docked there, do you have any estimate of that? MR. THOEMKE: No, I don't. The boat could be, you know, very -- variable depending upon, you know, what amenities are on that boat and everything. It may be anything from $60,000 to a couple hundred thousand dollars, I would think. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Well, that impact is it's going to increase the value of the property through these additional facilities that you're going to be building on there, so you -- MR. THOEMKE: It will increase the value of that particular parcel, sure. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. The third comment was that added usage, parenthetical, two boats, could negatively affect the dolphins and manatees. And I'll ask staff, is there any restriction on the number of boats that can be asked for on a single family lot such as this? MR. SAWYER: The normal number of vessels that are allowed are two for a single family residence such as this. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: And, Kris, you're not expecting any more than two boats based on the submittal then. MR. THOEMKE: No. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: You wouldn't be able to do so. I just wanted to -- MR. THOEMKE: There wouldn't be room for anything else, I don't think. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: No. I just wanted your confirmation, so... MR. THOEMKE: Yeah. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. I think that is all the questions I have. That's it. MR. THOEMKE: Okay. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you very much, Kris. I appreciate it. MR. THOEMKE: Thank you. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Is there a staff report, Mike? MR. SAWYER: Yes. We've got a staff report, last revised 6-10-15. We're here to answer any questions you might have. We are recommending approval of the petition. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: The only -- the only item for staff that I saw was you have on the applicants, and it's not just for this case, but apparently it's for quite a few, signed and a testament that the -- and I'll read it. It says -- and it's on Page 14 of the staff report, and it's a testament on the secondary criteria page, Page 6 of the application. I understand that the -- if this dock extension petition is approved by the Collier County Planning Petition, in effect the property owner may file an appeal within 14 days of the hearing. If I proceed with construction during this time, I do so at my own risk. I would suggest that we modify that language to coincide with what this office has and does in regards Page 4 of 6 June 25, 2015 HEX Meeting to that if that is a necessary part of the application. So, maybe that could be taken a look at by staff and be corrected. It appears twice in your staff report. MR. SAWYER: Yeah. That's -- that's part of our -- our standard application. And you're right. We probably need to take a second look at that, make sure that it is consistent. I'm sure that came from the process that we used to have for the Planning Commission. Now that it's going through your office, we need to review that. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: The appeal period is 30 days, just so you know that needs to be fixed. Thank you. Kris, appreciate your time. MR. THOEMKE: All right. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you. A decision will be rendered probably within ten days. We got 30, but we usually get it quick. MR. THOEMKE: All right. Thanks. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you very much. ***The next item up is Agenda Item 4B. It's Petition Number SV-PL20140002329. It's the HHGregg sign variance. All those wishing to testify in behalf of this subject, please rise and be sworn in by the court reporter. (The speakers were duly sworn and indicated in the affirmative.) HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you. The disclosures on my part, I have met with staff, gone through the files and attended the pre-app. I also have thoroughly read the staff report. Exhibit A will be the staff report, Exhibit B will be the legal ad. Is there a representative of HHGregg here? MR. BOYD: Good morning. My name is Michael Boyd, Petitioner. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Thank you. I don't have any questions for you. I've read the staff report. I didn't know if you had anything you wanted to add to the record. MR. BOYD: The only thing I could add is upon mailing the -- a letter to the adjoining property owners, I did receive three phone calls from residents at Banyan Woods, which abuts it on the back. Their only question is where they were concerned that HHGregg was trying to add a sign on the rear of the building facing their properties. When I explained to them that, no, the property that was going to be added on the front facing Airport Road, they had no objections. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Mike, have you received any objections from anybody; phonecalls, e-mails, letters, anything at all from staff? Or, I'm sorry. Nancy. MS. GUNDLACH: Good morning. We have not received any letters of objection. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. And I don't have any other questions. Do you have any objections to staffs recommendation, sir? MR. BOYD: No, I do not. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Thank you for your time. Is there a staff report, Nancy? MS. GUNDLACH: Yes. Staff has recommended an approval of the additional sign subject to a maximum of 23 square feet. HEARING EXAMINER STRAIN: Okay. Are there any members of the public wishing to testify on this item? Not here. With that, we will close that hearing and a decision will be rendered within 30 days, probably within ten days if we can keep up to our normal process here. So, hopefully, we'll get it much shorter than 30. With that, that takes us to the end of today's agenda. Page 5 of 6 June 25, 2015 HEX Meeting There's no other business. I have no public comment, so this meeting is adjourned. Thank you all. ******************** There being no further business for the good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by order of the Hearing Examiner at 9:14 a.m. COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER MARK STRAIN, HEARING EXAMINER ATTEST: DWIGHT E. BROCK, CLERK These minutes approved by the Hearing Examiner on , as presented or as corrected TRANSCRIPT PREPARED ON BEHALF OF GREGORY COURT REPORTING SERVICE, INC. BY ROSE WITT, COURT REPORTER AND NOTARY PUBLIC Page 6 of 6 AGENDA ITEM 4-A Coi[%r County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING: JULY 23, 2015 SUBJECT: BD-PL20140001542, DEMERET BOAT DOCK EXTENSION PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Kathleen Alyson Demeret 192 Tahiti Circle Naples, FL 34113 REQUESTED ACTION: Agent: Duane Thomas Duane Thomas Marine Construction, LLC 296 Rockhill Court Marco Island, FL 34145 The petitioner requests a 10-foot boat dock extension from the maximum permitted protrusion of 20 feet, which will allow construction of a boat docking facility protruding a total of 30 feet into a waterway that is 245.8 feet wide. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject site is located at 192 Tahiti Circle and is further described as Lot 160. Isles of Capri, Unit 2. The folio number is 52391040002 (see Location Map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of the project is a request for a 10-foot boat dock extension beyond the maximum 20 feet for the subject lot. The boat dock facility will contain one slip. The total dock structure will protrude a total of 30 feet into a waterway that is approximately 246 feet from seawall to seawall. There is no dredging proposed for this project and the total length shoreline is approximately 70 linear feet. A single-family house exists on the site. BD-PL20140001542 Page 1 of 7 Derneret Boat Dock Extension. 36 32 33 lUl/RIM OURS .+ ;•N Ley$: l� G E+ w MEW a S f 6 [BRAS ` --- - •' Mal 3 T j 1a i e 9 to 11 Pik— P3 ,6 1 _ 1T 16 13 14 e66iaur DAY 6 deco N+1 soAsif�l V Tlmert 0mm WSJ 20 a3 <13 26 OOI/191Y ' 21 �r w 1st eLL 0 31 32 PROJECT LOCATION 36 LOCATION MAP ZONING MAP PETITION # BID -PL-2014-1542 SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCEL: Single-family house, zoned RSF-4 (Marlin Bay is zoned A-ST) SURROUNDING: North: Marlin Bay, across which are single family homes zoned RSF-4 East: A single family home zoned RSF4 South: Tahiti Circle ROW, across which is a single family home zoned RSF-4 West: A single family home zoned RSF-4 Aerial of subject property (CC PA) ENVIRONMENTAL EVALUATION: Environmental Planning Staff has reviewed this petition and has no objection to the granting of this request. Section 5.03.06(E)(1 1), of the Land Development Code (LDC), Manatee Protection, is applicable to multi -slip docking facilities with ten (10) or more slips. The proposed facility consists of one boat slip and is therefore not subject to the provisions of this section. A Special Treatment (ST) permit is required prior to construction. BD-PL20140001542 Page 3 of 7 Demeret Boat Dock Extension. STAFF COMMENTS: The Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) shall approve, approve with conditions, or deny, a dock facility extension request based on certain criteria. In order for the HEX to approve this request, he must find that at least four of the five primary criteria and four of the six secondary criteria have been met. Staff has reviewed this petition in accordance with Section 5.03.06 and recommends the following findings to the HEX: Primary Criteria Whether the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. Consideration should be made of property on unbridged barrier islands, where vessels are the primary means of transportation to and from the property. (The number should be appropriate; typical single-family use should be no more than two slips; typical multi -family use should be one slip per dwelling unit; in the case of unbridged barrier island docks, additional slips may be appropriate.) Criterion met. The proposed dock facility consists of one boat slip, which is appropriate in relation to the 70 linear feet of water frontage of the subject lot. 2. Whether the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). (The petitioner's application and survey should establish that the water depth is too shallow to allow launching and mooring of the vessel(s) described without an extension.) Criterion not met. According to the petitioner's application the water depth (-5 feet) for the proposed dock facility is not a factor in the request. 3. Whether the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. (The facility should not intrude into any marked or charted navigable channel thus impeding vessel traffic in the channel.) Criterion met. According to the information submitted by the petitioner, the proposed facility will not adversely impact navigation due to the width of the existing waterway. The applicant notes that the facility has been designed similar to neighboring docks, so that it does not impede navigation. 4. Whether the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. (The facility should maintain the required percentages.) BD-PL20140001542 Page 4 of 7 Demeret Boat Dock Extension. Criterion met. Information provided in the application indicates that the proposed dock will protrude 30 feet (12.2 percent) into a waterway that is 245 feet in width. Therefore, the dock facility will maintain more than the required minimum of 50 percent of the waterway as open. 5. Whether the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. (The facility should not interfere with the use of legally permitted neighboring docks.) Criterion met. According to the drawings submitted and noted by the petitioner, the proposed facility has been designed to fall within the subject riparian lines (with a required side -yard of 15 feet) and does not interfere with adjacent neighboring docks or access. Secondary Criteria 1. Whether there are special conditions not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. (There must be at least one special condition related to the property; these may include type of shoreline reinforcement, shoreline configuration, mangrove growth, or seagrass beds.) Criterion met. The subject shoreline is hardened by a seawall. The dock has been designed to moor the 41-foot boat at an angle, minimizing the protrusion at a total of 30 feet. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. (The facility should not use excessive deck area.) Criterion not met. As shown on the drawing submitted by the petitioner, the dock area is wider than just a 6-foot walkway; however it is similar in shape to neighboring docks. 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner, exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. (The applicable maximum percentage should be maintained.) Criterion not met. As indicated on the application, the length of the vessel is 41 feet; therefore, the proposed dock is more than 50 percent of the property's 70 feet of shoreline. BD-PL20140001542 Page 5 of 7 Demeret Boat Dock Extension. 4. Whether the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners. (The facility should not have a major impact on the view of a neighboring property owner.) Criterion met. The view shed of neighboring properties will not be impacted. 5. Whether seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. (If seagrass beds are present, compliance with subsection 5.03.06(i) of the LDC must be demonstrated.) Criterion met. According to the information submitted by the petitioner's consultant (Turrell, Hall & Associates), no seagrass beds were found within 200 feet of the proposed dock facility. Therefore, there will be no impact to seagrass beds. 6. Whether the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06(E)(11) of this Code. (If applicable, compliance with section 5.03.06(E)(11) must be demonstrated.) Criterion not applicable. The petitioner's property is a single-family lot with one slip and is not subject to the provisions of the Manatee Protection Plan. Staff analysis indicates that this request meets four of the five primary criteria. Regarding the six secondary criteria, criterion 6 is not applicable, and the request meets four of the remaining five secondary criteria. APPEAL OF BOAT DOCK EXTENSION TO BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS: As to any boat dock extension petition upon which the HEX takes action, an aggrieved petitioner, or adversely affected property owner, may appeal such final action to the Board of County Commissioners. Such appeal shall be filed with the Growth Management Department Administrator within 30 days of the Decision by the HEX. In the event that the petition has been approved by the HEX, the applicant shall be advised that he/she proceeds with construction at his/her own risk during this 30-day period. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW This Staff Report was forwarded to the County Attorney's Office on July 1, 2015. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above findings, Staff recommends that the Hearing Examiner approve Petition BD-PL20140001542 with the following condition: 1. An ST permit is required prior to building permit approval. BD-PL20140001542 Page 6 of 7 Demeret Boat Dock Extension. PREPARED BY: 4 e. FRr70,EISCHL. AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: RAY D V. BELL S, ZONING MANAGER DATE ZONIIWDIVISION APPROVED BY: MIKE BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE ZONING DIVISION Attachments: 1. Exhibit A, Proposed Dock Dimensions 2. Application & Support Documents BD-PL20140001542 Page 7 of 7 Demeret Boat Dock Extension. 2460 WATERWAY MHW TO MHW 3' I OF r PA ELEV. rs� — 28.1' w off MUNK aw pew* Proposed Dock Dimensions MARLIN BAY 30' FROM PROP. LINE (MOST RESTRICTIVE) I 29.6' TO FACE OF SEAWALL CAP M4, 29.,4- TO FACE OF SEAWALL CAp 47 r 41' Mr - 4F2 1, A Lary TOP OF waw�J N89019 omw RAW. •o.r 70.W (P) NBM,13w 70.01' (M) -- Exhibit A rAMUTSFACF-OFSFAWALL °Haic s twolog) AP KZV ■ 3.V MHW LINE (0.42') COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2300 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coiliergau.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6359 . _., _ �... ..�. rSTA6 ..,... ,-. .DC Section .13. 6 THIS PETITION IS FOR (check one).„DOCK EXTENSION ❑ BOATHOUSE PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff, DATE PROCESSED Applicant(s): Ken & Kathleen Demaret Address: 1522 Longview Drive City. Diamond Bar State: CA ZIP: 916543t3 Telephone:909-262-3052 Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: kjd5358@gmail.com 0 Name of Agent: Duane Thomas Firm: Duane Thomas Marine Construction, LLC Address. 296 Rockhill Court City: Marco Island State: FL alp: 34145 Telephone:239-642-0116 Cell: Fax:239-642-4271 E-Mail Address: duanethomasjr@comcast.net Section/Township/Range: 32/51___ /26 Property I.D. Number: 52391040002 Subdivision: 426700 - isles of Capri Unit 2 Unit: 2 Lot: 160 Block: Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 192 Tahiti Circle Current Zoning and Land use of Subject Property: Residential BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 0 6/3/2014 Page 2 of 7 Cofer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLE5, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net i239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning 'Land Use N F - Residential Residential S E S (' ' Residential W o r -4 Residential DESCRlPT€Of °F PROJECT Narrative description of project (indicate extent of work, new dock, replacement, addition to existing `acility, any other pertinent information): New boat dock. Would like to extend boat dock to 30' into waterway to accomodate boat slip for vessel. L i p Wr Aw4lL ul��C! NaT PCQMt,�oc_.+.An:: WLigw" S-a r5L.tG ?�►��r3 CA soleV TI SITE INFORIVIA "-,J i. Waterway Width: 245.8 ft. Measurement from ❑ plat -1 survey ❑visual estimate ❑ other (specify) 2. Total Property Water Frontage: 70 ft. 3. Setbacks: Provided: 16 ft. Required:115 ft. 4. Total Protrusion of Proposed Facility into Water: 30 ft. S. Number and Length of Vessels to use Facility: 1. 41 or less jt 2. ft. 3. ft. 6. List any additional dock facilities in dose proximity to the subject property and indicate the total protrusion into the waterway of each: Of -ii 4,eC.r 7. Signs are required to be posted for all petitions. On properties that are 1 acre or larger in size, the applicant shall be responsible for erecting the required sign. What is the size of the petitioned property? .18 Acres 8. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes Q No If yes, please provide copies. 6/3/2014 Page 3 of 7 Cofer C URty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252.2400 FAX (239) 252-6356 www.colliergov.net Prirr���r,r - 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. The dock is in relation to the boat length slip required for this project. 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the general length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). The design of the dock and slip will allow boat to launch at MLT 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. The new dock will not have an impact on navigation 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between dock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. The dock does not protrude more then 25% of width or 50% of waterway between dock faclities. S. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. The slip is angled and will not effect or interfere neighboring docks • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT i7MSION1 PLANNING AND REGULATION Colder County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE MAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252.6358 www.coIIIwVov.net 1. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. designed boat dock to accomidate a owners larger boat It is designed at an angle and does not protude past dock designed. 2. Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel For loading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. Dock is designed to allow access to both sides of boat for safe access 3. For single-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels in combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject property's linear waterfront footage. N/A 4. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners (for property abutting residential zoning only). Will have no effect or impact on neighboring property owners waterfront views S. Whether or not seagrass beds will be impacted by the proposed dock facility. w i t�� 'lQ "mot r )ac7trr _ 6. Whether or not the proposed dock facility is subject to the manatee protection requirements of subsection 5.03.06.E.11 of this Code. kr Sr) ram' • E • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net COftie_r minty 2900 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)2S2-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for. lu Dock Extension Boathouse Chapter 3 S. of the Ad ;�inistrat've voc'4 - --- --------'----- ..� v.nacu a "11115 UIc r-1¢-MtJPIIL.d LIVfl IVIMLIn& ono aL time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW REQUIRED NOT COPIES REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 6 Signed and Sealed Survey 0 Chart of Site Waterway Site Plan Illustration with the following: • Lot dimensions; • Required setbacks for the dock facility; • Cross section showing relation to MHW/MLW and shoreline (bank, seawall, or rip -rap revetment); • Configuration, location, and dimensions of existing and proposed 6 facility; • Water depth where proposed dock facility is to be located; • Distance of navigable channel; • Illustration of the contour of the property; and • Illustration of dock facility from both an aerial and side view. Affidavit of Authorization signed and notarized 1 COmoleteia Addressine Checklist 1 Electronic copy of all required documents *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials 1 to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 0 6/3/2014 Page 6 of 7 oer "ty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coiliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -in Sheet Addressing: Annis Moxam Graphics: Mariam Ocheltree ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Historical Review ❑ Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -in Sheet ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Transportation Pathways: Stacey Revay m. ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock ❑ Engineering: Alison Bradford Other: ❑ Transportation Planning: John Podczerwinsky Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen FEE REQUIREMENTS: ❑ Boat Dock Extension Petition: $1,500.00 {�a C Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.00 An additional fee for property owner notifications will be billed to the applicant prior to the Hearing Examiner hearing date. As the authorized agent/applicant for this petition, I attest that all of the information indicated on this checklist is included in this submittal package. I understand that failure to include all necessary submittal nformajpq _may res in t e delay of processing this petition. nature of Petitioner or Agent Date • • 6/3/2014 0 Page 7 of 7 11- 20OLY SCALE P - 41Y f DOOM I�T L/r LOT 100 CONTAKS 0.18 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS. BOMMARY ff;~TION FtIRNFSWO BY CLIENT. LOT 169 LAY MARLIN BAY w W FROM PROP. LINE (MOST RESTT0CTIVE) 2ILW TD FACE OF SEAWALL CAP 7�Y 20.0 TO FACE OF SERWALL CAP j+All iue' 20' eq *N raft 70.w (P) Miq TIOTE L111E A01R8 FACt; OF SEAWALL WOOD DOCK D € LOl9© $ LOT 181 se -m"E 70.Br" Sw;, oDf fmsr w r aonn 70.00'(P) IV aaq CL NASSAU ST (P) I rCL i (I IR (M) J WNM ({aDA MAY,49W jj F) r7noP) N0B`10'00'W 77m r) 9 ICON SW 0 LOT 160 r :U 8-- o_� O Tj C;: •192 TAHITI CIRC8 ^ S' ELEVATED CONCREFOUNDATIONFF"16.5 _w s.a• e :Z O . 0 FIP 1" �. NO 1C, n v — N 886'i91'w i 11ssW.f.4-mA 6V• CERTIFIED T0I KEN & KATHLEEN DEMARET Grid North I' = 30' LCUERO' NAYD XX EI r XISf110 ELEVATIONS 4LCULITEO FIELD AEASURCD p/S NR) 0011-a"I AL 0110 R) • RECORD PC MADI• R4DIAL P �RDo •OASS �C/L . OF BLARINBS tt OR1D-NAp Da FL EAST ZONE) tCNt[a IN[ PUN CATV 'ICCED CABLE TV BOX ►T CAPE CORAL ENSINEERINO DEPT. PPUT COP COTERCD CONCRCTC PAD Clr = ONAtN 'INN FENCE DP CON • CONCRETE CP • DE CONCRETE PAD DRAINAGE EASEMENT SIR + E• DRAINASE 6 UTILITY EASEMENT ED0€ OF PAVEMENT FC N [ CORMEN BNBT FDN • FOUND DRILL ROLE SP fF . FIRISNED FLOOR ELEVATION RW rip = rTR • ►OVNj IRp11 IPE FOUNIRON NOD TO FN6T FOUND RAIL t TAB TNN TEL BF FLOOR ELEVATION. TYP HYD 6ARARE `IBEYHYDRANT usem L/ - LS LICE" BUSINESS SURVEYOR %m = NAD = 1LIICENSED NCRTN ►MERICAN CAT I WK WIW an.Oi•ul SB 6133 JTBN 3.45 60' ROW ASP AL'. 17' T NASSAU )STRE E T LINE L I (C) L I (FI L 1 (R) L 2 (C) L 2 (F) L 2 (RI L 3 (C) L 3 (FI L 3 (R) FDH _ FIR 5/8" LB 3964 yc/ � c„ m �/V J V S 88°49 31�"IEI -C/L•/\ 40.33'(C) v BFARIKG DISTANCE S 01'10'29'W 30.00' S 01110.291W 30.00' S 00.41.001W 30.00, N 88'49131'W 70.00, N 88.52'06"W 70.05' N 891.91001W 70.00, S 88'49'3i"E 70.00, S 88'52'23"E 70.03, 5 89•l91001E 70.001' PARCEL DESCRIPT M : LOT 160. ISLE OF CAPRI NO. 2. ACCORDINS TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECDRDED.IN PLAT BOOK 3. PANE 46. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. IATYN NOjTES, �� s g 'OWES LIN[ 2) UNDEER9R00 UT ILNTIEST FOUNDATIONS• THEREOF. :BHT situ CTURE4 WERE NOT FIELD LOCATED DR SHOWN. URVE 0) ONLY INTERIOR INPRDYEMENTS SHOWN WERE LOCATED. CONTROL ►OINT 41 PARCEL WAS SURVEYED FROM INrORMAT1ON TURN]5ME0 BY THE CLIENT. IAL SURVEYOR 5) PARCEL LIES IN FLOOD ZONE AE BASE ELEVATION 'ANBENCY S.0' NAYD (FIRM 1202IC 0926 H CS-16-12] ILITY EASEMENT 61 PARCEL SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS. RESTRICTIONS. RESERVATIONS AND RIG NTI-OF-WAY Or 4ECORD. 7) ELEVATIONS ARE NAYD 191E BASED OR 'OL IB. iE LOCATIaN OF S1 NO WETLANDS OR JURISDtCt10N LINES WERE LOCATED. 16• IRON S,STAMPED THIS MAP OF SURVErr IS ON``Y FOR THE LAND DESCRIB[D ,TAB IT IS NOT A CERTIftCATION OF TITLE. ZONINS. EAS[MfNT. CRON FREEDOM OF ENCUMBRANCE. OWNERSNiP OR AIBHTS-OF-WAY. ADOIT IONS OR DELETIONS TO THE SURVEY MAP BY OTHERS THAN THE BIBNINI PARTY CR PARTIES 10 PROHIBITED REACNHARX WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT Cr THE SI SNINB PARTY OR B0I PARTIES. THIS NAP Of JURY 13 N07 VALID WITHOUT THE SISNATURE AND THE ORIBINAL RAISED SEAL OF THE FLORIDA SCRENT LICE[NSED SURVEYaR t RAPPER. IFS�COAST • ADS RAC NOT REVIEWED R.K.BURNS SURVEYING, INC. LB 6133 3507 LEE BLVD. 0246 By°--- LEHIIH ACRES. FL. 33971 yAP OF .BWNDARY SURVEY ift s.A... Sr. � '--- 279?J003Oppy27f TAXI FED ' IE�iD Rd"'A.6^ PSAH•LVASM or INFOy UR NSSURYE Y INI.tON • • OUQVQYO(2'� C6QTIPICATC eN11aA�AuateL L. saae�. Naeaw uertPT rll{.T tiapOML MAD! A aaeeNT wWaY OI• TXAT ►satA�r1 �x'p~'O t'µ� K INeIOAT'{q WEAL MT A•fµi0 dRs{NGa MUMNMaNTi (/7111Aae) �,{RV OAIO�f NIOwN ON AtTAC A, MY {NDNLa tDN AND aautN°r ROeIaA.TNIs ,f}��I'YWDDtOpWAeD COUNTY b.MV OPMAasN. AA•. �O. . 1'1.0{/OM LAND tULMI`lOa �f •• NOLLYWOOO. YtOaltlM. t MORTOAmtr MOLOlR3 I Az TNa 4-Owul-Nov Aa yg,wW Ola Tb L" NO► KAww PAN. JWN IN TNtf PL. 0-# Nifs � INT/ OC3CRIPTION /% f{.TeWNw•veil ewaaNMtNT LOT s, w aacrle/ ALL LAMOM N OULU M AO:IQTOMl .~MIS ..IYNetW TOWNMIIP DI fauryl. aANMK 'N b.IN 1fCtpN M I.AN D! A"aQtAD K AstiaLT10N. a~fk►T•.Ir'La YOIN6 Ay TNL IbtlO..r it �, SD �• fu1NM1��.TTI TXf. ssYTN MRT/I IA �w'af'rTAuwe Tlla wserr�ifrrN� wi OtCTON io A bIN1 eyN"' sDY111 �MM"•H NLAt7 =4 f'l TIIaNOL. fYN l/lt >� NffWNDAaY />• lAIO �L ODYTN P►.7PO RLT 7b TNa h'�f+dl! OP MID teT 91 TNLNCa. ayN biM ft! • 'a q JKAr+aa a No�Nw �LaT TD T {aO1Nr11N O. NOT 60 f.fsaaANaNr aatsttw.a �*'N'14'tT (►fW. M..� a Nsor sarlalt M"Ns�ievs�i•e � DI� �K �R Naas re..• TILa, _ rANaaNrs. ,CgLa II. t rK TOOT 0 S L E S OF MARCO.O(:A� No. , ALL O, 00 COUNTY,PLOfRI V'T LOT AMD 40.T =1l.GTION POP - OOV'T A •� LOT OJ C!l�I CAT ION .IAAaN, INC.All ANe..r H TntnY Ras{.•TA .IX AT A ODaPOaMTgN NI &0 11H TTIt !1<ATt Of lLOabA. XAs CAY►lb �Al11 �O TM tr sN�Yloao ANe ft.Arne w�Tfa ANf -��•�r� i ( � M.A= YOM/tMI Ts R NNDwN fL IKp q OAR) MO�O'.� ALI• slaaLTO AND WAT66WAYs —. —� aXOwN A.,1 n 'owA1L1•Nefssa O° aTlLii wauiDilea.ATae Te rft .....!-^'.._. sr uT w V ar. TI WNiafOP 1 ON MAZ4,6 r f T, RAT"AV ACKNOWLP-C ozMtNT �LM•oA fmum"w A f"fNASP,M RafONA uYK �MItY TNAT .N ?"to MY TO „Aa`Nf"b aspas A'O. L.1.1,0ACN. t.OA{N. mt... Td Ma K TNL ftitfaN.NT O� ---:a — :afalN wnv N•IOWN Te a{ 7TIL ANO ACSNps=.. w"Ttl.M M74ya gOAi Nl1 t6 NI! RaL Aa7 TMa tAaCNTgN 'Ms"b1�{ps, OM► MIOMW! ANIf� T �Dp �_O�RKM�I sML H T'Na AaT ANbo eaaf O� 711AT g1yOLAT1.,UL, W17NLY YWMaNAr4lat e eetOr�wwaeb� M. noL�e�A.lRllp MI CDNMItONN awryyy �,� ' wa. x, IfM "rr T • � �r COUNTY GOMMI��ION TNIs ftAr wwf A+rafvae Aeeanso r0s Sssq sr 1•.a t/ATY s owl Of OfO.AT�pyt.,INILNLff n.t DINNTY . ILOa•OA• rNu i�O Oro Mw IffO. fPfp.IaOt ATTafTt Ct - 1�. ...1 �A7< aa� NOfpls CIRCUIT COURT CLL0.K N•Lae �Oa ""CORD TNIO iy sNf f� I'rAaq� r� IN Ada AO .4 TNL tttOtq bN COLt�sf zzPita IOl'It (N0.s NI1F1 7N{ PaOVlbN1 l0► t•A. TM) LAw.f or TN[ fTAT6 � �tN ANp ArA C0.UY .M.MY (wo Collier County Property Appraiser Property Aerial Parcel No. 52391040002 Site Adr. 192 TAHM CIR • 11 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) AL , oIg 400is, VZ 1, ""' Den"" (print name), as -- (title, if applicable) of +e2 TaW Ch. NSON Fl (company, If a licable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) ownerM applicantQcontract purchaser Mand that: 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorizeO—Th « to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes: • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pros. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's "Managing Member-" • if the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words as trustee" • in each instance, first determine the applicants status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of penury, I declare that I have the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated i It are true. Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER The foregoin instru nt was swam to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on S 1 (date) by � ! V11A ✓ a(name of person providing oatA or affirmation), as who is personally known4ftnatof has produ I� V (type of identification) as identification. srA1111P/sE,nL Notary—PublI61 0i*4(151, NANCY A SCIOG MY COMMISSION #FF133a88 EXPIRES June 17, 20'„ . 1 3a6-015I FbAdaNala Se+vkx.com CP%&COA-W115U55 REV 31W14 LOT IGO COMAM 0.18 ACRF-3 Or - LAM MORE OR LESS. BOUNDARY SHFpANTTOR FUIRHbFED BY CUENU [Wifr7rTm SO FROM PWP. LINE 2M TO PACE OF SEAWALL CAP 20.4' 70 FACE OF SEAWALL CAP ��w .s r..l LPPMIL.f NS9.19C0A911 " OSIIaP�r.1IAt 70 w In NSS"2S191A1 7O 0T'jMI _ LOT ISO EXEP 1 Sir' 1N'tt1T 1 T i131T1126- FO r PJ11ID m 7'r NIN. IISp L;. Boom, ITGCJt LOT 161 wi CL NASSAU ST (P) Clig ill YAUM ^10 (gItl 111% — L (ROADWAY. P.U.E.) aA HUB'1!UTTcrvu � . 77WWr) $ d NOTE& 1.THE IIEAI.ILE6 SIIOYM HEREON ARE SASEO ON TMECEN INA IE OF NASSW 3r P ) BMDYBH N PLAT BDOi H PACE M COILEER COUSRY, EENJO NLIRIN MB Mf OD' EAST. 2.MPROWBAPITS OTHER THMI THOSE SHU + AM NOT A PART OF THIS IlLwar. &64&DES' -Fr LAND.SUBJECTTOALLUTIBCAYSBON MM"TIDW,PMKWATM S„ REBTINCTOW. JT]MA3 NO RIORTBOF VMY OF RECORD. /MUTE OF FOB SURVEY MARCH 7. M& AMR RAISEDUOrVRLDCBN TIE SURVEYOR E AM PIA.ID SETTLE OF A AiOIOA LTC®�BURVEYOR AM MAPPER ADDITIONS aft OBFTIO. TO SURVEY YAPS OR WOU1B IY OnM nM THE BSMVO PA MON PARRES a PROM IS"m WInaur PSITIENCOPI ENT OP flE SMIHRUA PARTY OU PARTS. HIOT JIMACEAMBMCNMMAL COMMONS WERE MOT aN.� ABA PARrOr77 5 SURVEY. NO STATBaw 1SWAOR COIO.ORHS THE EXISTENCE OF UPDMISNOLRO OR OVBSNEAD OONSASISRS. UTILITIES O1FiA1:SftSBL THAT MAY AFFECT THE USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF Tli PROPERTY. TA LEVAT1ONS SNOIMI ME RAM ON NAVA. DATUM) OF 110IL OEBWi1dH OF ENCHIMM 38 AS FOLLO Mc W No HIM YAP cw . W10UNDARY SURVEY (S4TE PLAN FOR PROPOSED DOCK) a LOT `60 OF ISLES OF OAPIII 00. E AS RECORDER IN PLAT GOOK 3 PAGE(S) 48 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 122 TAHITI CIRCLE (FORMERLY NASSAU STREET) TM SURVEY 0 PREPARED FOR: DU NE THOMAS MARINE CONSTRUCTION SALL SIMACE AND SUBSURFACE 01MON AM ICERTWY THAT)NIB BURYkY Whil IEAOE INpERW AOAACBHT TO THIS PROPERTY ANOT NEC6BOANKY 040M IT M DRECT04 AND THAT EM Ti M1ft1{BE Tf,C1Ii('a ON RE SURVEYMNAP. S rANDNWS SET FORTH BY THE BOAIm OF PROFESSIONAL,. o LISAW1 PROPER" 4 WFUMT® M PI.000 ZONE • • AS L &ND SURVEYORS AND 1NPPERA N CHAPTER 61 Gg74 S. A"m ON marrow MORE LAF PIA.; NO NM ' i vF',..'.'!r, ADMINISTRAITA COOL PURSUANT TO SECTION DATM SAME ELEVATION OETBUSED AT INS4:-3P.`DA rATY4ES, 1SIHD TFTLE OPPMpTH ON ANSTHACF TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY NAgem PROMD®.ALL SRIOIMLVMNAS MEN @UP* ED T' " A :'L,'jj1I1fATFC"OFTrn&ZONIM EASE ENIS OR . BY TIE QBIT. R E POSSBLE THAT THEE ARE GL'EIOB. FAMRSM OR OTIMONT AVPM FOCpRDED OR _. YMSNMY d1 AFFECT THE MBTCT PROPERTY.SKiNED MOTHE PUBLIC RECORDS HAS SEEN MAM BY THE SURVEYOR. 11. THE PURPOSE OF INS SURVEY E TO SIIOWTHE PROPOND - DATE DOCK AREA VAIM ASSPIECTTO THE PLATTED SV.ICCf PRO!■BY. PROPERTY LIES ART. SNORM AS PUT. DA3 O -wim A IM PDOI SUItvEYOA DR VIp �• SIT t? .OI ROOd•SY NBSMIIUi.4 ■-SITPifOONrJE16 N0lIL8i/Hf(AII OEOQISCLR PSMS8004 O -sotMD CSNOH.TE MIorIIR.I1rNEIMNEYOIUDRFCMq L6 0 7112 !�-9EIOSEMlKODLIIDORSET) RAY-RBNrOFTwYFLo:wa O -FOUND A►OI N NIUL AND O.CT SIAVEYDR D g p7t) - } _ �•SET►i WH AN7O�P'RSSSEOM TSPtSSIIHI PD.•FOLAO ■ ■-- IS REMIT-FOUIDNM.AMIMITAS Nw•SBHDIISAwL PAP. .Pe1BLMrBNrooInIlOLNroBNT PIFFLE. • lifawJBFr DICE Court y n& Inc., 6iB-OOAICILEFE BLDCABIIUICCO FF+FSBIII®HTAOIt ®OH-►AE CATVK71R>ETY OW-00PIRIU RT®LETALPPS . - M TabnCK4 ' 04•PHELDMEASURS OW U.T&-'N M INUL-HTHE R.ER Naples, FbAdB 34104 O9ON IM•PLATORRECOLmSDPGOIBAEUE®SBPr {CI•CALCUtA=WASURB®HT COW-CONC STE RBH-PLAT BOOSISE- LANE MAIFI9WSCEEASBEM (ZWA43-7M01100 Dtls03►O M13 R.C.P. • AIIPORCEO CONCRETE PM PROP • PROPERTY 78M 1E CL•C61TN"M TOIL ..TOPOFSANL U111-UMYEASEW, : Job# s•.M:AIDUE e• COUPrlY V..P GM)272.3707 ad Fb E"I B Py 50 9 0 0 N !<Ea �- K•^�le� QP�+wR� �} uP.rsE '-t �ar�ws fr a Rf Nc 0 mct, E14D HC Mttit 12 ,�. TRA TE --- .-. sLAs ToPENE SttliS FoUNDAMW WNUUM 4'-0' bwo* m a Par -M 54ftLe • 9 Are 0 • Collier County Payment Slip (PL) Date: July 16 2014 Contact: Duane Thomas Marine Construction LLC 296 ROCKHILL CT MARCO ISLAND, FL 34145-- Proect Name: 192 Tahiti Circle BD Project Number: PL20140001542 Web Access Code: 5739 FEES: Boat Dock Extension I PL20140001542 1 500.00 Legal Advertising Fee PL20140001542 92570 0 Cod fer cmnty •COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION! NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252.5724 WWW.COLLiERGOV.NET ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed bv Addressinci Personnel Prior to re- aappfication meeting Please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED, Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ® BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) Carnival/Circus Permit CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SIPi (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) PNC ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) (Project Name Change) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal &Site Fill Permit) • [I RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) isles of Capri Na.2 Lot 160 FOLIO (Property iD) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) 52391040002 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, ff already assigned) 192 Tahiti Circle • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) SDP or AR or PL # 9 x Maier my COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE . GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION/ NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252.5724 WWW.COLLIERGOV.NET Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Please Check One: ® Checklist is to be Faxed back ❑ Personally Picked Up APPLICANT NAME: Ken & Kathleen Demaret PHONE 909-262-3052 FAX 239-642-4271 Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY FLN Number (Primary) Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Dater: Updated by: Date. IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED 0 auaveYoa'a ceaTl�ICATE. TNAT ILNAYa RMAaI ARhCiMT a�suiV\Y RO► 7NR NIRaON OIa,60n Ye tAMOa AA INs1e TR THAT RRNANRMT RaPRRa•lea. MON4MRNT! 'MLR ►LT AT LOfA7TOlq wT! RAT ANO THAT pv" . L�n.+a OalfiT "o TIIR aaM 4 KNONLaORt AN.O aWta aA7LO NOLLY RaOANARO CO MYrraalaA .7N.► IrR Y Or q• WAR". AA INN.. f'. NLR1 .L LANK SLP*WKVM •W71 NOLA.YWOOV./LORIM MOTLTafgmr• moo-ouIaA Tra TIL Ll4MOffi ~ AIM FAILaL.aaRT NA Metiawra ON I M LANOO R11TTW fKaia =a 1-aO•.4taNT TO ANO JO.M N TN.f Pun Ao �W r ._ •v1a Y.� na D c•IR.1PT1 O N ALL Of OO4La.•MRNT LOT R. N at N ►i. TOMNAy.v rl MNN MMaL 7.a aAOT. INe.aOWa ALL LANK AaaW aO •f AaCRTNWI A/N 7ONNaN 11 !1 ARUT .M LAN WT lOT O • IN fKTNM K LANOf AeC41aO N R !► RAPT. IMCLYOINO fLA TNL roaLwlNa .usL,iuT'ON'aNasnlNaTaR.l�l,. Tile MYTNYnaT IYIaia asu . \4 M aOaMl O Ml& NaTMN .dN Naar. aLTONNI 0Nr\aT.OMMWWW LLNTI BUT, 1► PUT, TMOMaI. OM Hdp=yLOyOa• WaAa►a . LfM •ajT TO A ro1NT ON T1a Lwf' aNN•OARY Or *^w LOT TO R 7LRNaa. WN Lw17N IaA•f pUT.1f0 rN7 TNl NORM aRIT�. O► AA.O LAT RI TMWaL.WN OtA7NNr it, A O17TAgMiL OW "PANS P! TO MLl TOI.NT O MOINN.N♦ MOT E3 a • raa.ANwT 7p al aaa MfIMLWi7 (ra►0• ! �-1 • • ..rT Aa. Y awra•1\NT ON LOT TAla4 a.O•►L ., A4.L Rtasa Tp•laa AfA1R raa7 L+IMaNswNs Asa m 'Nns.asTwN w 7aNaaNn, xAL_fa T r • T .} 1.. I.JO Nat Ll 15LE:5 OF CAP Rl No-2 MARCO, COLLILPR COUNTY. FrLORIOA ALL. CIF 00'T LTOO ^MO P^Wr OP dOV'T LaT 9 IN RCGTION f4•RI .to OCOICAT ION rNaw ALL NW M Twaaa ►fttsmw►.TNAT ►r wYLroaMTMli• LNOta M LANs er TNa arA7t N nes.aA. N/u swLaae raa TVlow NA.1 N d�lvlpbe ANO ►LATT►a M •LN.I\ a a''AaaL N,!" fl rewN a ALL. waaLTa ANO WwTaaW. Y\ ONaMN M aA.O a►AT wR NLRaw Irou ATae to Tfl\ ~ INN Awvwif� waa ear w+aL.lt INL1O ANO saAt TNIf li ems•— — aw 4Or MARSK = Ls.er , N.e.IicNt ACKNOv/LGOOlMENT �. i rLeL.aw�ss LMwNLC L NLRaW atATlr'Y TNM iN 7N1\ aw aafaMlALMf RPOR NL. L. L.LiAT.N. wow" LV&SO Sam, T12!* \L'XL TatW7 �K TNL Paaaar/ R!O\ Raa .I'1 ANO WNO MaaVTRO TNa rORMay RM wMa M►TdMaNi p WGUMATLLN AMO Aaa•Wawa►aaO Tla \aKYT.►N TNaLaO► A R NIL fLAI AR ANO Lalo wf AueN sMlsq, My TNT Ma AHIW YNIR 7K M 7Nw TLI %Aa'a T M a1O1N{�M ANa aqa N aA.O a•f1aaATNNa AI MTNRN MY f.OWriaa ANO NNa1wL sar N►N.YWNa. aRfwwaO 1 � OAY N MARCN. A.R Nlaia�x � AiR.M. Taff N .rT aONMlaflaN aarlLaf. •'�") a". NL. NRa couNTY COMM13510H TNIf RAT W/1► ArPpraa .L,p AAL(a CR�LLuL OY TNL w�aa ar aNr•ly C yaw .fArV�A .AR Ias&. rL0{IPA. 7ma is aMf N �e O ArrYVaa MATR ROW"MY Na Tefapa G1RCI,I IT cou RT CLCRK PILas Poa aewta Tws stl rw.v ANata, w.a .pr, N RAN aeL a aAsa 4 as TNa w+aua Rmss► w TwA•we eeuNTY 7a1N1u�,AT 'Ca»NIA`..Nu L ' ►aa.Y.M.► 1N' vL�a.aw. '� Lw"'f ar TNT aTAYI Ov FDII L3 FDI cnN sw N LOT 160 r .F vo o - — -192 TAHITI CIRCLE $ 2.S' ELEVATED CONCRETE O N ' FOUNDATION =W Fr•16.I —_ o i•R ei-Cr, Q rotCA � YLTr•s.o: pw- �e Ne W aa; �aa4c FIP la F MO ID, N m 491ti 1 :�t•I•FrIR n•i CERTIFIED TO- KEN k KATHLEEN DEMARET GridNorth I• = 30' LEBEMD• CK [CISTIYB ELEVA71/IFS �3 MAYO a •CALCULATED f1 • FIELD REASLIMED �� AON -RADIAL OHS OH pl �MMI RI • RECORD PC RADI• t0I RADIAL pC p + L!L • 1A315 Of BEARINIS ((OR ID -WAD OM FL EAST TONE) CCNTERLINf PWA IAfV • CABLE TV BON CCED = CAPE CORAL EMBINEERINI DEPT. CCP •COVEXED CONCRETE PAD CLF iNPut All LINK rENCC N CCn1ETE REP pC►ROW • PAD SIR DUE • COP DRAIMARC IASUET UTILITY CASEMENT EDBE rC F FOR OF PAVEMENT F NOE CORNER FOUND pRI LI HOLE SUMI7 , SP Fr rip FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION i01OlINIO SR PE g,s ido TB 1 FNrT or • IN FOUND HAIL t TAR IARAI[ FLOOR CLEVATIOV 'UE 7Q� TYP • BUY WIRE NTO •FIRE LB - HYDRANT LICEKSED BUSINESS use" LS = LIC060 SURYCYOR WN kAD NCATP iM[R[CAN DATUM TM L_i i L2 I.00'(C`-BOB�MP -' w AI9.00•(Af SNd-T LB 6133 TBM 3.45 60' RvASPHALT_ 17_ TAH1T1 STRfE7 NASSAU STREET(R) LINE L I (C) L l IF) L I (R) L 2 (C) L 7 IF) L 2 (R) L 3 (CI L 3 (F) L 3 (RI F:R 5/8^ </ 3964 _LB J N Q Q S 19•t••00•[ 0a0,SS •/AI S 88°49131"E -C/L 41 280.33'!C) . BEARING DISTANCE S 01°10'29•W 30.00' S 01°10'29aW 30.00' S 00°41100"W 30.00' N 88°49.31"W 70.00' N 88.52'06NW 70.05' N 89°,9'DOaW 1,0.00' S 88°4913iaE 70.00' S 88°52.23aE 70.03' S 89°l9100aE 70.00' PARCEL DESCRIPTION, LOT 160. ISLE OF CAPRI 40. 2. ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED.14 PLAT BOOK 3• PAGE 46. OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA. jwTYtl NOTES - II DIMENSIONS ARE !N FEET AND DECIMALS THEREOF. 'DRIER LINE 2 UNDERIROUND UTILITIES FOUNDATIONS. AND I BUT STRUCTURES WERE NOT FIELD LOCATED OR SHOWN. .OBOE 31 ONLY INTERIOR IMPROVEMENTS SHOW WERE LOCATED. CONTROL POINT N PARCEL WAS SURVEYED FROM INFORMATION FURNISHED BY THE CLICMT. IdL BUNYETO! 51 PARCEL LIES IN FLOOD ZONE AE BASE ELEVATION IANI[NCY 6.0' MAYO (FIRM 12 IC 0826 H 03-16-12), IFAYTY EASEMENT 6t PARCEL SUBJECT TO EASEMENTS. RESTRICTIONS. T ELfVAT10NNARENI%DSHf9000NASED ON COCDIDB. 'N 8� NU WETLANOS OR JURISDICTION LIRES WERE LOCATED. III LOiAT IDY Cr IS• IRON '33STAMPED THIS MAP OF BURYeeY IS ONL• r0R THE LAND DESCRIBED t TAD IT S NOT A CERTR ICATIUN OF TITLE a 20NIN8. rABEffbt. 'ORCA FREEDOM OF ENCURNRANCE. OWNERSHIP ER NIBMTS-OF-WAY. ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS Tn THE BURY Y MAP BY OTHERS TRAM THE StONIND PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED CQZCMMARK PARTIES. TM18EMAPDNOBESVRYEYTH3 NOTNVALIDAMITNOIRIT THE SI.NATDRE AND THE ORIBINAL RAISED SEAL OF THE FLORIDA SEMENT LICENSED SURVEYOR a; MAPPER. 719 COAST s AORTA AC NOT REVIEWED nerrr MIST LEE SD. FL. 13s246971 yAp OF BOUNDARY SURVEY I LEMISN ACRES. 239-303-0T64 FM HF= EMED 2J9-303T2 (FAY) I NfOSBURNISURVEYINI.0 ON Row IorI Jam S Um Sr. psami4 .-ml r 1NawA• 4 IaN�°B' /StlF„S•SDBM°r IL L Ll 0 0 l "i L Jt ki f , tfieA (f M-,wn W, r-r Lire " r I LLLE.TKQPUCALLY uS)Eh DRriri toFi 1$ ff i I I r 3 r '3 7 Y ~" a t I rE~ 1'orI-lk ntb .� ' 9,suts 1')iWriCt p t WOOD 1 WOOD DOCK DOCK 29S.S WATERWAY MARLIN BAY MHwrO MIHW 17. PROP. LINE (MOST RESTRICTAIE) Z/lOX FACE OF SEAWALL CAP22L4r 28.4'TO FACE OFSEAWALL CAP, acALE r LOT 1#0 CONTANS 0.14 ACRES OF LAND MORE OR LESS; BOUNDARY INFORMATION FURNISHED BY CUENT, LOT 159 NOTES: LYRE BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE BASED ON THE CENTERLINE OF NASSAU', O(P) OF COLLIER COUNi88 PAG40 G 84p 91' 00" EAST, ZIMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN THOSE SHOWN ARE NOT APART OF THIS SURVEY. 3.SAID DESCRIBED LAND IS SU"'I TTO ALL BUBpryLS10N REGULATIONS; RESERVATIONS, RESTRICTIONS, ZONING AND RIGHTS -OF- WAY OF RECORD. 4.DATE OF FIELD SURVEY APRIL 3, 2014_. $.THIS SURVEY MAP IS NOT VAUD W(THOUTTHE SIGNATURE AND RAISED SEAL OF FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER, ADDITIONS OR DELETIONS TO SURVEY MAPS OR REPORTS BY OTHER THAN THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES IS PROHIBITED WITHOUT WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SIGNING PARTY OR PARTIES. &SU SURFACE AND ENVIRONMENTAL H6 WERE NOT BEXAMINED AS A PART 0F TO HIS SURVEY. OSTATEMENT IS MADE CONCERNING THE EXISTENCE OF UNDERGROUND OR OVERHEAD CONTAINERS, UTILITIES OR FACILITIES THAT MAV AFFECT THE USE OR DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY. TELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED ON NAND. DATUM OF low. DESCRIPTION OF BENCHMARK IS AS FOLLOWS: FPKWW8004 RED EAST EDGE OF ROAD ACROSS CANAL ON ISO PAGO PAGO ELEV. - 3.2 NBS•18'Op'IIV . I u"' - BALL SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE IMPROVEMENTS ON AND ..w(11) «we, areaY N#p28•I2•W NOTE: MIRY LNE(0.4T) ADJACENT TO THIS PROPERTY ARE NOT NECESSARILY SOWN ON TN18 SURVEYMAP. FACE OF SEAWALL 9-SUBJECT PROPERTY IS SITUATED IN FLOOD ZONE • • AS wow INDICATED ON FEMA FLOOD ZONE MAP PANEL NO WA DOCK DATED' BASE ELEVATION DETERMINED AT N/A 10.NO TITLE OPINION OR ABSTRACT TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY HAS BEEN PROVIDED. ALL INFORMATION HAS BEEN SUPPLIED BY THE CLIENT. IT IS POSSIBLE THAT THERE ARE DEEDS, EASEMENT$, OR OTHER INSTRUMENTS (RECORDED OR UNREDE) ICH MAY AFFECT THE SUBJECT 0. PROPERTY NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS HAS BEEN MADE BY THE SURVEYOR. 11. THE PURPOSE OF THIS SURVEY IS TO SHOW THE PROPOSED LOT 181 DOCK AREA WITH RESPECT TO THE PLATTED SUBJECT PROPERTY. PROPERTY LINES ARE SHOWN AS PLAT. 000R TOJXY(Pj� u81•'I CL NASSAU ST (P) YCLTAHITICIR (M) (80' WOE) (ROADWAY, P.U.E) 480A1'(P) gjg �— NBa1B001N 0 - FOUND I-) IRON ROD ( SURVEYOR ID IF) (FIR) ®- BET /lr IRON ROD (PSM 08004XSIRC) ■- SET 4 X4•CONCRETE MONUMENT (PSM #8004)(SCM) O - FOUND CONCRETE MONUMENT (SURVEYOR O #)(FCM) +BENCHMARK (FOUND OR SET) RAN- RIGHT OF WAY(R.O.W.) 0 - FOUND NAIL OR PK HAIL AND DISC ( SURVEYOR IDS) (FIR) (11 • SET PK NAIL AND DISC (PSM i8W4) (SPKNBD) FD. - FOUND FNBTT - FOUND NAIL AND TIN TAB SM - BENCHMARK P.C.P. PERMANENT P.R.M. = PERMANENT REFERENCE MONOL POINT UMENT (#) CBS -CONCRETE BLOCK 6 STUCCO FF - FINISHED FLOOR (PG) - PAGE CATV-GABLE TV CMP • CORRUGATED METAL PIPE (M) • FIELD MEASUREMENT U.T.S! UNITED TELEPHONE RISER (P) OR (0)- PLAT OR RECORDED(DEED) MEASUREMENT (C)- CALCULATED MEASUREMENT COW - CONCRETE (PS)- PLAT BOOK LME - LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT R.C.P. - REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE PROP - PROPERTY C.L.- CENTERLINE T.O.B. - TOP OF BANK LIE - UTILITY EASEMENT OLRE =OLANDSSCCAP BUFF R EASEMENTUELEC - ELECTRIC PUE - PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT SWE . SIDEWALK EASEMENT MAP OF BOUNDARY SURVEY (SITE PLAN FOR PROPOSED DOCK) LOT 160 OF ISLES OF CAPRI NO.2 AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3 PAGE(S) 46 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA 192 TAHITI CIRCLE (FORMERLY NASSAU STREET) THIS SURVEY IS PREPARED FOR: DUANE THOMAS MARINE CONSTRUCTION CERTIFICATION: CERTIFY TNAT THIS SURVEY VMS MADE UNDER MY IIRECT70N AND THAT R MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL TANDARDS SET FORTH BY THE BOARD OF PROFESSIONA AND SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS IN CHAPTER SJ-17, LORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE, PURSUANT TO SECTION EASEMENTS OR SIGNED COURT H. G EG R�PS 04 DATE tE V� DATE OF FIELD SURVEY 04-03-2014 PSM # 6004 LB # 7112 C.G.S. Gregory Surveying, Inc. 761 Teton Court Naples, Florida 34104 (239)643-7845 office Date 04/04/2014 C9S60O4@cOMCa3t.net Job # EN40096B (239)272-3707 cell Fb EN4-19 Pg 59 Duane Thomas Marine Construction, LLC The only "name" in marine cons&uctlon! April 30, 2015 Fred Reischl 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, Florida 34104 Dear Mr. Reischl, Our office is in receipt of your letter dated April 27, 2015. We have made the requested corrections and they are as follows: • We have attached a copy of the submerged resources survey for the project with this letter. 10 • We have also attached an analysis of the Primary and Secondary Criteria of §5.03.06H of the LDC. • We have corrected the responses regarding the Secondary Criteria #5 and have attached submerged resources survey for your review. • We have also corrected Secondary Criteria #6 and have responded accordingly. • We submitted the appropriate paperwork for the ST permit to the County on April 21, 2015. Please contact our office if you should have any questions or require any additional information. Best regar t Duane Thomas President 191 Rockhill Coo, . Marrn Island, Florida 34145 a Phone• (239) A47d1111; • Fax. (739) 64?-4771 License :124326 • Email duanethomasjr@comcast.net /171 T� .r � GOUT ER COUNITY GOVERNMENT MCC- MQfc'i`H RORSES -,012- tOP,f'<rc GRQtAMH iMANAGESM,r;,s : i':riSl€?ii,/ , ?, -E =i..OM€21g 3E.104 PLA1%ivMS AW0 RM.t_iiA—Z ION 239} 252-2 FAX (239) 252-6W ';�.4rt.trt;�iergdv.ref< I. Whether or not there are special conditions, not involving water depth, related to the subject property or waterway, which justify the proposed dimensions and location of the proposed dock facility. designed boat dock to accomidate a owners larger boat It is designed at an angle and does net protude past dock designed. 2. }Whether the proposed dock facility would allow reasonable, safe access to the vessel for ocading/unloading and routine maintenance, without the use of excessive deck area not directly related to these functions. Dock is designed to allow access to both sides of boat for safe access 3. r®r vrigle-family dock facilities, whether or not the length of the vessel, or vessels ir, combination, described by the petitioner exceeds 50 percent of the subject properi'v's 1'7nez- waterfront footage_ ,. Whether or not the proposed facility would have a major impact on the waterfront view of neighboring property owners (for property abutting residential zoning only). vVill have no effect or impact on neighboring property owners waterfront views 5. VVIether or not seagrass beds sxill be impacted bF the piOposed dOcit fLie ty. -�..A.AA fit'^' ii. ar .rK)Q C hd cc� ` � �'U 06 6. Whether or not the ro osed dock facility r (r6�, t: p P tY is subject to the manatee protection retpuirerrtents of subsection 3.03.05.E.1 Y of this Code c� re.rr�,� so a • • E co Ofer county COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE 13ROW'rA MANAGEMENT € ISION] NAP LES, FLORIDA 34104 PLANNING AND REGULATION (239) 252.2400 FAX (239) 252-6358 www.collfwgov.net 1. Whether or not the number of dock facilities and/or boat slips proposed is appropriate in relation to the waterfront length, location, upland land use and zoning of the subject property. The dock is in relation to the boat length slip required for this project. f,�Ls C,(, 2. Whether or not the water depth at the proposed site is so shallow that a vessel of the genera! length, type and draft as that described in the petitioner's application is unable to launch or moor at mean low tide (MLT). The design of the dock and slip will allow boat to launch at MLT 3. Whether or not the proposed dock facility may have an adverse impact on navigation within an adjacent marked or charted navigable channel. The new dock will not have an impact on navigation. Xt -Due-, riot d rifru'- L. t,"h 6 gi� �` ' ° rt«X net.v: c r_ ,c .nt <J MuS , rr rc '% wsse Ty-,LP-7 4. Whether or not the proposed dock facility protrudes no more than 25 percent of the width of the waterway, and whether or not a minimum of 50 percent of the waterway width between clock facilities on either side is maintained for navigability. The dock does not protrude more then 25% of width or 50% of waterway between dock faclities. S. Whether or not the proposed location and design of the dock facility is such that the facility would not interfere with the use of neighboring docks. The slip is angled and will not effect or interfere neighboting docks DEMARET DOCK 192 TAHITI CIRCLE ISLES of CAPRI, FL 34113 SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY Apt, 249 2015 • PREPARED BY. TURREL , HALL & ASSOCIATES, INC 35" EXCHANGE AVENUE, STE B N"Ur.% FL 34I04 DEMARBr DOCK SUBMEJWW RESOURCE SURVEY ,4PRu,24.2015 • 1.0 brrRODUCTION Tbe Dtmaret Duck and rcmdence is looted at 192 Tahiti Circle, identified by Parcel Number 52391040002. The property is located within a canal off Capri Pass on the northwest side of Isles of Capri. The property is bound to the north and southeast by Other single-family rrewdenoes and bound by West Pelican Street to the southwest. The property is located in Section 32, Township 51 South, and Range 26 East. The upland portion of the property is a single-family residence that is proposing to construct a docking facility. Tuna, Hall & Associates was contracted to provide a Submerged Resource Survey (SRS). This survey will provide planning and review assistance to both owners and agenCY reviewers m regards to proposed projex. The proposed projed consu is of cormtructing a $UIS10-f wily dock within a canal off Capri Pass. The SRS survey was conducted on April 21, 2015. Light south winds, partly cloudy sides, and an incoming tide resulted in visible access to the entire project area. Surface water conditions on this day were calm which also helped to provide fair environmental conditions for the survey. The water tee was 79cF. Low tide O=u ed at 9:30 A.M (0.8') and high tide occurred at 3:16 P.M (3.0') on the date of the survey. 2.0 0xizcTNx The objective of the submerged resource survey was to i and locate Xisting submerged resources within the limits of the proposed Moe any rovided onsite environmental information to her 1� Pl1pj°�rt' The survey provided o ee tmg subm p amine if the proopmed project would impact any etged resources and if so would assist in rVOOnfiguring the proposed dock in order to minimize any impacts. The general scope of wodc performed at the site is summarized below. • T1urell, Hall & Associates pemaomned contracted a site visit and snorkeled these tr'Ansects within the proposed project basis and verified the location of any submerged resources. • TUrrell, Hall & Associates personnel identified submerged rewurces at the site, estimated the % of coverage, and delineated the approximate limits of any submerged resources observed. • Tlurrell, Hall & Associates personnel delineated limits via a handheld GPS (Garmin Model 72H). Page 1 of 3 DEMARETDOCK SUBMERGED RESOURCE SURVEY A.PRtL24, 2015 3.0 XujaonoLocv Turrell, Hall & Associates biologists intentionally designed the methodology of the SRS to cover the entire property shoreline for the proposed dock installation. The components for this survey included: • Review of atrial photography of survey area • Establish survey transects lines overlaid onto aerials • Physically swim transects, GPS locate limits of submerged resources, and determine approximate percent of coverage • Document and photograph all findings The surveyed area was evaluated systematically by following the established transects spaced approximately 10-feet apart as shown on the attached exhibit. The neighboring properties have existing docks which provided easily identifiable reference markers, such as dock piles which assisted in locating transects and keeping them consistent throughout most of the survey area. One biologist swam these transacts using snorkel equipment within the surveyed area. The other individual assisted with compiling notes and documenting findings on aerials. • Located submerged resources were photographed, the approximate percent of coverage was quantified, and the location was delineated on an aerial photo as well as confirmed via handheld CPS (Garmin Model 72H). The biologists used a half meter square quadrant further broken into sections by cordage to make coverage estimates easier. 4.0 REsuLTs The substrate found within the surveyed area included two distinct classifications; silt sand with shell debris and just silt/sand material. These substrates were found scattered throughout the surveyed area, 'There was also scattered small oyster, clusters and shell debris along the property shoreline next to the rip -rap placed m front of the existing seawall. The shoreline consisted of a concrete seawall with scattered rip -rap that provides habitat for numerous fish, crabs, and barnacles, growing on and around the rip - rap shoreline. The majority of the survey area exhibited a silt/sand bottom that was devoid of any aquatic vegetation growth or any types of submerged resources. The lack of any submerged resources is most likely due to the overall water quality within the canal as well as the deeper water which does not allow much sunlight penetration. Page 2 of 3 0 DeMARLrr DocK SuBMBBGED RssouRca SURvEY APM 24, 2015 . Various filamentous algae and macro algae were observed and documented growing along the bottom sediments throughout the survey area. Also observed were numerous fish species during the survey and a list of these species has been prepared and is provided below as Table 1. Table 1 — Observed Fish Species Common Name mangrove Selentific Name L striped mullet Mugil cephalus — snook - CeirtronWus undecimalis lack crevalle Caranx hinnos 5.0 CorgCLUSIONS The submerged resource survey at the site yielded few findings. Barnacles were observed growing on the concrete seawall as well as on the rip -rap which is located in front of the seawall. Due to the rip -rap along the subject property shoreline there were numerous fish observed in this area because of the cover the rock provide& With the Iack of any submerged resources within the surveyed area the proposed project is not expected to cause any negative impacts to any natural submerged resources. • • Page 3 of 3 Observed slit sand with shell debrfs within surveyed area Observed algae growth In deeper depths past proposed dock location • 0 0 Existing concrete seawall with piles and rip -rap, looking southeast Existing concrete seawall with piles, lookins northeast • 0 AGENDA ITEM 4-B Co*er County STAFF REPORT TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT -PLANNING & REGULATION. ZONING DIVISION- ZONING SERVICES SECTION HEARING DATE: JULY 23, 2015 SUBJECT: PETITION VA-PL20150000006, 6950 VERDE WAY PROPERTY OWNER/AGENT: Owner: Don and Victoria Strumillo 6950 Verde Way Naples, FL 34108 REOUESTED ACTION: Agent: Christopher Kalina Infinite Renovations LLC 13114 Cardeto Ct Estero, FL 33928 To have the Collier County Hearing Examiner consider a variance from Section 4.02.03 A., Table 4 of the Land Development Code, to reduce the minimum accessory structure side yard setback from 25 feet to 2 feet for a renovated pool and pool deck, and a proposed new pool screen enclosure and colonnade, and from 25 feet to 19 feet for a permitted lanai expansion; and a variance from Section 5.04.03 of the Pelican Bay PUD, Ordinance No. 77-18, as amended, to reduce the minimum tract boundary setback line from 25 feet to 2 feet for a renovated pool and pool deck, and a proposed new pool screen enclosure and colonnade, and from 25 feet to 19 feet for a permitted lanai expansion GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject project is located on property located at Lot 9, Point Verde at Pelican Bay, in Section 4, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. (See Location Map on the following page) PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT: The purpose of the petition is to request a reduction of the minimum accessory structure side yard setback and the minimum tract boundary setback for a renovated pool and pool deck, and a proposed new pool screen enclosure and colonnade as well as a permitted lanai expansion within a limited portion of a single family residential home. The renovated pool and pool deck, proposed new pool screen enclosure and colonnade as well as the permitted lanai expansion were VA-PL20150000006, 6850 Verde Way Variance June 23. 2013 Page 1 of 9 LOCATION MAP D 0000 a PETITION # VA7PL-2015-6 ZONING MAP sow nwn r n both permitted with incorrect side yard setbacks at 10 feet (see Attachment B). The minimum tract boundary setback is acquired from the Pelican Bay Planned Unit Development (PUD) Ordinance number 77-18, Section V, Group 2 5.04.03 A (see Attachment C). Under Section 5.04.03 of the Pelican Bay PUD a 25-foot tract boundary line setback is required from the tract boundary lines, right-of-way lines and/or edge of the gutter of a private road. The minimum accessory side yard setback is acquired from the Collier County Land Development Code (LDC) Section 4.02.03, Table 4. The Collier County LDC defines a triangular shaped property, such as the subject property is, as having one front and two side yards and there is no rear. The Pelican Bay PUD housing Group 2 stipulates minimum yard setbacks under PUD section 5.04.03. However, it does not distinguish between principal use and accessory use structures. It was deemed by staff that due to this lack of distinction, the side yard setback will refer to the Collier County LDC. Per the LDC, 4.02.02, Table 4, swimming pool and/or screen enclosure side yard setbacks refer to the Same as Principal Structure (SPS). Accordingly, the side yard setback for principal structure is 25 feet, per section 5.04.03 of the Pelican Bay PUD. Therefore, the renovated pool and pool deck, proposed new pool screen enclosure and colonnade as well as the permitted lanai expansion encroach both into the LDC minimum accessory structure side yard setback as well as the Pelican Bay PUD minimum tract boundary setback. In total, a variance is sought to allow a 2-foot side yard setback and tract boundary line setback from the required 25-foot side yard setback for the renovated pool and pool deck, and pool screen enclosure; and a variance is sought to allow a 19-foot side yard setback and tract boundary setback from the original 25-foot side yard setback and tract boundary line setback for the under construction lanai expansion. With regard to the proposed new pool screen enclosure, it should be noted that the previous pool, fence, and pool deck have been on the subject property since 1997 and encroached within the minimum accessory structure side yard setback and minimum tract boundary setback prior to the current residents. VA-PL20150000006, 6850 Verde Way Variance June 23, 2013 Page 3 of 9 EX1 STRUMILLO RESIDENCE ZZ-- +- M PREPARED FOR: MR. 6 MRS. STRL LLO I-VERDE "" .....« .............. SCREEN ENCLOSURE EXHIBIT NDRTH MO WAY LES, COLDER COUNTY, FLORIDA a�aoaeua •acxtraerua■ ..—w--�•—.+� SURROUNDING LAND USE & ZONING: SUBJECT PARCEL: Single and multi -family residential development and golf course with zoning designation of PUD, specifically the Pelican Bay PUD. North: Single Family Residential development, with a zoning designation of Pelican Bay PUD. East: Pelican Bay Golf Course located on the Pelican Bay PUD South: Pelican Bay Golf Course located on the Pelican Bay PUD West: Residential development and then the Pelican Bay Golf Course, with a zoning designation of Pelican Bay PUD. Aerial photo taken fro►n Collier County Property Appraiser website. GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN (GMP) CONSISTENCY: The subject property is located in the Urban Residential Subdistrict of the Urban Mixed Use District land use classification on the County's Future Land Use Map (FLUM). The purpose of this subdistrict is to provide for higher densities in an area with fewer natural resource constraints and where existing and planned facilities are concentrated. The Growth Management Plan (GMP) does not address individual variance requests; the Plan deals with the larger issue of the actual use. ANALYSIS: The decision to grant a variance is based on the criteria in LDC Section 9.04.03 A. Staff has VA-PL20150000006. 6850 Verde Way Variance June 23, 2013 Page 5 of 9 analyzed this petition relative to these provisions and offers the following responses: a. Are there special conditions and circumstances existing, which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or building involved? Yes. According to information provided by the applicant, the land abuts a golf course and two lakes which cause fear of the following: errant golf balls landing in their backyard at high velocities and alligators which can enter their backyard from the lake. Thus, due to health, safety and welfare reasons, the applicant believes that having a pool enclosure will protect them against both dangers. The variance request for the Lanai was after -the -fact due to incorrect setback information. b. Are there special conditions and circumstances, which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property, which are the subject of the Variance request? Yes. According to information provided by the applicant, when they purchased the subject property in 2014, a pool, fence, and pool deck already existed on the property since 1997— original to the home; portions of this pool, fence, and deck have encroached into these mandated setbacks since their inception. Moreover the encroachment of the lanai, already under construction, was thought not to encroach into the side yard or tract boundary setback due to a previous permitting approval with incorrect setbacks. C. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties for the applicant? Yes. As aforementioned, the Collier County LDC defines a triangular shaped property, such as the subject property is, as having one front and two side yards and there is no rear. The Pelican Bay PUD housing Group 2 stipulates minimum yard setbacks under PUD section 5.04.03. However, it does not distinguish between principal use and accessory use structures. It was deemed by staff that due to this lack of distinction, the side yard setback will refer to the Collier County LDC. Per the LDC, 4.02.02, Table 4, swimming pool and/or screen enclosure side yard setbacks refer to the Same as Principal Structure (SPS). Accordingly, the side yard setback for principal structure is 25 feet, per section 5.04.03 of the Pelican Bay PUD. d. Will the Variance, if granted, be the minimum Variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety and welfare? Yes. The proposed screened new pool screen enclosure and colonnade will follow the general make-up of the already existing pool deck and fence (since 1997); it will allow the residents to retain the already existing general footprint of the pool area. The permitted Lanai expansion variance request is the minimum variance needed to remedy the 25-foot side and tract boundary setback. VA-PL20150000006, 6850 Verde Way Variance June 23, 2013 Page 6 of 9 e. Will granting the Variance confer on the applicant any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district? No, all of the neighbors within the vicinity of this address have given their approval in written form: all 12 neighboring residents; the President of the Pointe Verde Homeowners Associate (an immediate neighbor); the General Manager of Pelican Bay; and the Chairman of the Club Pelican Bay Board of Governors. The Pelican Bay Foundation has also formally approved a setback variance in accordance with the Pelican Bay Covenants and Declarations (see Attachment D). f. Will granting the Variance be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this Land Development Code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? Yes, the granting of this Variance will be harmonious with intent and purpose of the LDC and there will be no injury to the neighborhood. Moreover, most of the neighbors (except to the west of the property) have screen enclosures. Therefore, a screen enclosure on this property will not be inharmonious with the neighborhood. g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf courses, etc.? Yes. As previously stated, the subject property abuts a golf course; the side of the home where the property setback is being sought does not affect any other residential backyards other than the golf course. h. Will granting the Variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? Approval of this Variance will not affect or change the requirements of the Growth Management Plan. ENVIRONMENTAL ADVISORY COUNCIL (EAC) RECOMMENDATION• This Variance petition was not required to go before the EAC for review and approval. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: The County Attorney Office has reviewed the staff report VA-PL20150000006 Verde Way on July 8, 2015. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner (HEX) approve Petition VA-PL- 20150000006, 6950 Verde Way Variance. VA-PL20150000006, 6850 Verde Way Variance June 23, 2013 Page 7 of 9 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Variance Petition Application Attachment B: Permit, PRBD2014123551901 Attachment C: Ordinance 77-18 Attachment D: Setback Variance, Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc. VA-PL20150000006, 6850 Verde Way Variance June 23, 2013 Page 8 of 9 ATTACHMENTS: Attachment A: Variance Petition Application Attachment B: Permit, PRBD2014123551901 Attachment C: Ordinance 77-18 Attachment D: Setback Variance, Pelican Bay Foundation, Inc. PREPARED BY: Rachel Beasley, PLANNFR ZONING DIVISION REVIEWED BY: /-a� ff,**, /-ae� RAYM D V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER ZONING DIVISION MICHAEL BOSI, AICP. DIRECTOR PLANNING AND ZONING DIVISON G , 2, 5-- (,5� DATE G .zr.lr DATE G. -( IS - DATE VA-PL20150000006, 6850 Verde Way Variance June 23. 2013 Page 8 of 8 ...le_ Cooer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collierxov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 VARIANCE PETITION APPUCATION Variance from Setbacks Required for a Particular Zoning District LDC section 9.04.00 & Code of Laws section 2-83 — 2-90 Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code VA — PL20150000006 Rev 1 PROJECT NUMBER 6950 VERDE WAY DATE: 2/20/15 PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED DUE: 3/6/15 APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Don & Victoria StrumillO Address: 6950 Verde Way City. Naples State: FL ZIP: 34108 Telephone:630.640.6700 Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: dstrumillo@amsdirect.com Name of Agent: Christopher Kalina Firm: Infinite Renovations LLC Address: 13114 Cardeto Ct City: Estero State: FL ZIP: 33928 Telephone:239.961.2450 Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: ckalina@infiniterenovations.com BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. Attachment A 6/4/2014 Page 1 of 6 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWrH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collierzov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: 68160000759 Section/Township/Range: 4/ 49J 25 Subdivision: 570400 - POINTE VERDE AT PELICAN BAY Unit: Lot: 9 Block: Metes & Bounds Description: Total Acreage: •52 Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 6950 Verde Way, Naples, FL 34108 Pointe Verde in Pelican Bay ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N Residential Single family S Tract Club Pelican Bay Golf Course E Tract Club Pelican Bay Goff Course W Right of Way Vence Way Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: Front: 30 Corner Lot: Yes ❑ No Q Side: 10 Waterfront Lot: Yes ❑ No ❑■ Rear: 25 FChearing of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public ertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. he Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertisingediately. 6/4/2014 Page 2 of 6 —f Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergoy.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.colliergov.net/index.asox?oage=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Pointe Verde Homeowners Association Mailing Address: 6251 Pelican Bay Boulevard City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34108 Name of Homeowner Association: Pelican Bay Foundation Mailing Address: 6251 Pelican Bay Boulevard City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34108 Name of Homeowner Association: The Club Pelican Bay Mailing Address: 707 Golf Park Dr City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34108 Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: Name of Homeowner Association: City: State: ZIP: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: NATURE OF PETITION On a separate sheet, attached to the application, please provide the following: 1. A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased property; when existing principal structure was built (include building permit number(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. 2. For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. 6/4/2014 Page 3 of 6 —f QAT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collierizov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? 4. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes © No If yes, please provide copies. 6/4/2014 Page 4 of 6 Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT ZWO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collieritoy.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Variance Chapter-3 J. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) += r Pre -Application Meeting Notes 1 r Project Narrative += r Com leted Addressing Checklist 1 r Conceptual Site Plan 24" x 36" and one 8 %"x 11" copy El Survey of property showing the encroachment measured in feet) 2 r Affidavit of Authorization signed and notarized 2 r Deeds/Legal's 3 r Location map 1 rEl Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend Included on aerial 5 [] ❑ Historical Survey or waiver request 1 Environmental Data Requirements or exemption justification 3 Once the first set of review comments are posted, provide the assigned planner the Property Owner Advisory Letter and Certification 1 ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 0 ❑ ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 6/4/2014 Page 5 of 6 —�.'_ Co er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collieraov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following reviewers: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet ■ Addressing: Annis Moxam W Graphics: Mariam Ocheltree ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Historical Review ❑ Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko ❑ Transportation Pathways: Stacey Revay ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock ■ Engineering: Alison Bradford Transportation Planning: John Podczerwinsky ❑ Other: ❑ Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen FEE REQUIREMENTS 0 Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 12( varian,5P Petition: Residential- $2,000.00 o Non -Residential- $5,000.00 / o 5'h and Subsequent Review- 20•A of original fee W Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.00 ❑ After The Fact Zoning/Land Use Petitions: 2x the normal petition fee ❑ Listed Species Survey (if EIS is not required): $1,000.00 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive 4' — Naples, FL 34104 Applicant Signature Date Don Strumillo Printed Name 6/4/2014 Page 6 of 6 N�FINI\TE RENOVATION Collier County Government 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples FL, 34104 Planning Number: PL20150000006 Site Address: 6950 Verde Way, Naples, FL 34108 To Whom It May Concern: We are requesting a variance approval for the construction of a pool screen enclosure for the Strumillo Residence at 6950 Verde Way, Naples, which is located in the Pointe Verde Homeowners Association in Pelican Bay. In compliance with the Collier County Variance Application, we submit the following: 1) Detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of the encroachmentproposed usingnumbers, i.e. reduce frontsetbackfrom 25ftto 18ft, when property owner purchased property7 when existing principal structure was built (include building permit numbers Ypossible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc RESPONSE: The Strumillos (via the Victoria Lynn Strumillo Trust) purchased the subject home in 2014. When they bought it, a pool, fence, and pool deck already existed on the property, having been there since 1997 when the home was built Portions of the current pool deck and fence sit within the setback for a pool enclosure, making the variance necessary. We are proposing to erect a screened pool enclosure and colonnade (which is required by the Pointe Verde Homeowner's Association when erecting a pool enclosure) around the pool and pool deck, in order to create a safe and enjoyable outdoor living space. The screen enclosure will sit approximately atop the existing pool deck and fence. The screen enclosure will require a reduction of the front setback from 30' to 24', and the side setback to be reduced from 10' to 2'. There is no encroachment on the rear setback. 2) For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations including any dredging and filling RESPONSE: We are requiring a variance that will reduce the front setback from 30' to 24' and the side setback from 10' to 2'. The footprint of the new screen enclosure sits approximately atop the existing pool deck and fence, which is on the East side of the property and faces directly onto the fairway of the Club Pelican Bay golf course. A line of mature trees separates the property from the golf course fairway. Golf balls shot from the course are regularly found on the property including in the pool and on the pool deck, presenting a life safety issue for people using the outdoor space. 3) Pursuant to LDC Section 9.04.00, staff should be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny variance petition by the criteria (a h) listed below. a. Are there any special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure orbuildinginvolved? RESPONSE: The home is in proximity to the tee box of hole number 2 of the Pelican Bay Golf Course, such that errant drives, which are evidently frequent, cause balls to enter the property, at high rates of speed. Balls have been frequently found in the pool, on the patio, and in the adjacent bushes and street. These balls present a serious safety hazard for anyone utilizing the outdoor space and negatively affect the ability to enjoy the space without fear of incident Most properties that abut the course have similar screen enclosures as that being proposed. Additionally, there are two lakes within 200 yards of the home, and the Pelican Bay golf course is known to have alligators, which can cause harm to humans sitting in an open area. In addition to protection from balls shot off course, the screen enclosure will protect the pool and home from falling debris and branches from the large, mature line of trees immediately adjacent to the property, as well as dangerous, unwanted rodents and reptiles. A Are there special conditions and circumstances which do notresult from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request? RESPONSE: The pool deck is original to the home and little has been done to modify or modernize the space since original construction. The Strumillos are a much younger and more active family than the previous occupant, who was over 80 years old when he sold, and will spend significantly more time utilizing the outdoor space. The construction of a screen enclosure is necessary to ensure the safety of the family and their guests. c Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant? RESPONSE: A literal interpretation of the zoning code will require a significant decrease in safe, usable outdoor space and decrease the development of the property to the full advantage for the owners, whicjh would otherwise benefit the values of all homes in the neighborhood. d. Will the variance, ifgranted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards ofhealth, safety or welfare? RESPONSE: Yes, the requested variance is at the minimum to fully develop the property for a safe use of the pool, pool deck and outdoor living space, as dictated by the footprint of the existing deck and fence. e. Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege thatis denied by these zoningregulations to other lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning district? RESPONSE: Other than granting a variance to the setback requirements, this request does not confer any special privilege on the homeowner, nor does it infringe on the privileges of other adjacent property holders. All of the neighboring property owners are in favor of the variance being granted as it allows the reconstruction to continue and bring the property value of the residence in line with adjacent properties, thereby benefitting the entire neighborhood. f. Willgranting the variance be in harmony with the intentand purpose of the zoning code and not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? RESPONSE: The variance is in accordance with the intent and purpose of the zoning code, which is promulgated to protect neighbors from unwanted and undesirable incursions. In this case, all 13 residents of Pointe Verde have provided written statements in support of this variance request Additionally, the President of the Pointe Verde Homeowners Association (an immediately adjacent neighbor), the General Manager of the Club Pelican Bay, and the Chairman of the Club Pelican Bay Board of Governors (who happens to be the neighbor directly across the fairway from the subject property, with a direct sight line to it) have also submitted their written approval of the variance request The Pelican Bay Foundation has also formally, officially, and publically approved this variance in accordance with the Pelican Bay Covenants and Declarations. Finally this will not represent an undesirable incursion to the neighbors because most of them already have screen enclosures such as the one proposed, and the enclosure will be constructed in strict compliance with the covenants and protections required by the Pointe Verde homeowners association g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc ? RESPONSE: The inclusion of the screen enclosure at the Strumillo residence will provide a safety measure for occupants and visitors to the residence from poorly shot golf balls. Additionally, golfers will be able to utilize the course to their full abilities without fear of causing accidental personal injury or property damage from their bad shots. A Willgranting the variance be consistent with the Growth ManagementPlan? RESPONSE: Granting the variance will have no negative effect on the growth management plan, and will allow the residence to be updated to the standards of the Pelican Bay community. The plans are consistent aesthetically with surrounding properties, align with the covenants of the Pointe Verde Homeowners Association, and are approved by the Pelican Bay Foundation. The proposed enclosure will increase the value of the property and therefore positively impact the value of other homes in the neighborhood. We respectfully request that this variance be approved by Collier County. Thank you in advance, Christopher J. Kalina Infinite Renovations LLC. President & Director of Operations COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT #: PRBD2014123551901 PERMIT TYPE: BD ISSUED: BY: APPLIED DATE: 12-22-14 MASTER #: COA: JOB ADDRESS: 6950 Verde WAY JOB DESCRIPTION: RENOVATION INTERIOR, WINDOW 8t DOOR JOB PHONE: REPLACEMENT, DECK ADDITION, NEW POOL, SCREEN ENCLOSURE 6950 VERDE WAY LOT 9 SUBDMSION #: FLOOD MAP: FOLIO #: 68160000759 OWNER INFORMATION: VICTORIA LYNN STRUMILLO TRUST 7020 HIGH GROVE BLVD BURR RIDGE , IL 60527- FCC CODE: CONSTRUCTION CODE: 0207 JOB VALUE: S1,900,000.00 BLOCK: ZONE: ELEVATION: SECTION -TOWNSHIP -RANGE: 4-49-25 CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: Infinite Renovations LLC 13114 Cardeto Ct Estero, FL 33928 CERTIFICATE #:: 1,cc=i4rx 29a APPROVAL DATE: 01-20-15 PHONE: LOT: TOTAL RES SOFT: 6390.00 TOTAL COMM SOFT: 0.00 SETBACKS FRONT: 30 REAR: 15 accessory LEFT: 10 RIGHT: 10 SEWER: WATER: CONTACT NAME: CONTACTPHONE: Per Collier County Ordinance No. 2002-01, as it may be amended, all work must comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and any additional stipulations or conditions of this permit. This permit expires if work authorized by the permit is not commenced within six (6) months from the date of issuance of the permit. Additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to the commencement of construction may be imposed. Permittee(s) further understands that any contractor that may be employed must be a licensed contractor and that the structure must not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued. NOTICE: PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE, FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE (EITHER THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR) TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP). FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT DEP AT (239) 344-5600. In addition to the conditions of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR E"ROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Attachment B 6 C3 0 ORDIRANCE 77 - is AN ORDINANC! 111mID= ORDINANCE 76-30 THE ZONZNG RSGQLNTZOW2 FOUR TRR IIRINCDRPOR109D AREA Or TBE COASTAL AREA pLillDIZUG DISTRICT OF COLLIER COur"N' 7LO312DA, By CBI=== T8E ZONING DISTRICT CLASSIFICATION OF THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED BEREIN rWK -25-4- SINGLE FAMILY,-101-1- UMTIPL= FAKMT,-6RCwGwIP UL RETAIL COI G=XAL,-R8-48T- AND IM-M•�"- . SPECIAL TREATMMW TO A PLiWNED DWIT DEVELOp- !O.'NT (PW) AND PRO1r r= AN E!lECTM DATE. WHEREAS, Coral Ridge -Collier Properties, Inc.,' corpgy- ation, petitioned the Board of Coemty Cossiissioners. 0; ol7tr-n County. Floirda to change the soninq classifica+ici& o real property hereinafter described. is M -•z � Q NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of Cc w Comissioners of Collier County, llorida: SECTION ONES I. The Zoning Classification of the herein described real property in Collier county, Ficrida, is changed Pv -RS-4- and-RS-4ST- Single Family and Special Treatment,-R1t-10 and -RM-1ST' Multiple r mily and Special Treatmant) and wGRC■ General Retail Comercial to planned unit Development (POD) and is subject to all conditions as hereinafter described, and the Official Zoning Atlas as described in Ordinance 76-30 is hereby amended accordinglye seat; 007 nct 6 .t Attachment C ;`� ■ PLANNED MIT DEVELO"Mm Docum T FOR PELICAN an A PLANNED XZSZDEn= COPJ=TY By CORAL RTDGE-CCLLIEA PROPER'1'188• INC. APRIL 8, 1977 lee I PELICAM SAY PLiIlQM "M . jj CommmitY Planning . I=V HE TAL PLAMIMO i DEBIGit Miami Lakes, Florida , t Environmental Lnginearina .. OE3 i JEtiBOlf ENGIBEERS-ARC9MCTS-PLAWRRS, MIC. Nast Pals Beach, Florida �• t piological studies 'PiIOPICAL SIO-To in m a TSB DSVEIAPNM CO. Kiami, Florida j Economic Anal"is - IrJVJ=II, O'LEARY AND ASBOCIATES, INC. L. Washington, D.C. I Traffic Design • POST, DQCBLEY, BCmm i JBRNIme IMC. - Miami, Florida Golf Course Design I ARTHIM Mus AND ASSOCAIM Toledo, Chin ILocal Coordinating Consultant• WILBON, MILLER, SAATON, BOLL i PEEJC, INC. Maples, Florida Legal Counsel XXXTU, YOtTNO a Xt." P.A. • l Attorneys at Law Tallahassee, Florida C� i ti • .aiN C . • PAGE + LIST or EXHIBITS STATEMUT OF COMPLIANCE iii , [ PROPERTY OWNERSHIP &.DESCRIPTION SECTION Z 1-1 PROJECT DEVELOPMT SECTION II 2-1 IDTZLITY SERVICES SECTZON III 3-1 IRESIDENTIAL GROUP 1 SECTION Iv 4-1 RESIDENTIAL GROUP 2 onmOK V 5-1 IRESIDENTIAL GROUP 3 SECTION VI 6-1 RESIDENTIAL GROUP 4 $Emog VII 7-1 �• GOLF COURSE SECTION VIII 8-1 t 1 NEIGHBORUOOD COMMERCIAL 68CTION iX 9-1 COMUNITY i AREA CONMRCIAL SECTION Z 10-1 CONSERVATION AREA SECSZON XI 11-1 UTILITY AREA SECTION ZII 12-1 DEVELOPNZNT CMIIMITMEM SECTION XIII 13-1 i t jLIST or EXHIDITS EXHIBIT A Evidence of Control of Property EXHIBIT 8 • Vicinity Map EXHIBIT C Site Plan EXHIBIT D Boundary Map EXHIBIT E Topography Nap EXHIBIT r SOiL Map IEXHIBIT G Vegetation Map EXHIBIT H Pelican Hay Zmpz want District Act EXHIBIT I Estimated Unit Absorption Schedule and Population Projection 1 EXHIBIT J Internal Roadway Requirements EXHIBIT K f Traffic Signal Locations ' I 1. . wx OW ra 65 STATSM IT OF COMPLIMCE The development of approximately 2104 acres of property in Sections 32 and 33, Township 48 South, Range 25 East and Sections 4, 5, 8, and 9, Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida, as a Planned Unit Development to be known as PELZCut SAY will comply with the planning and development objectives of Collier County. These objectives are set forth in the Comprehan- sive Plan which includes the Growth Policy and Official Land Use Guide, all of which were adopted by the Hoard of County Commissioners on October 14, 1974. PELICAN BAY will meet the planning and develop- ment objectives for the following reasons: 1) This property is surrounded by developed property on three adjacent landward sides. 2) An arterial roadway is in existence along the project's eastern boundary. There are also roadways along the north and south boundaries of the proposed project. 3) The property is entirely within the boundaries of the Pelican Bay Improvement District which was created by the Florida Legislature for the purpose of providing water management, potable water and of treatment facilities for the proposed development. 4) The proposal land use mix is compatible with the surrounding uses. 5) The project rates points in excess of the 31 points i necessary to determine it to have existing community facilities and services for the residential density and permitted uses of the proposed plan and therefore is not leapfrog growth. 6) The project shall comply with the applicable zoning and subdivision regulations and all other County and State laws dealing with platting and subdividing of property at the time improvements and plat approvals are sought. iii eras 007-im 66 . SECTION I IPROPERTY OWNERSHIP i GENERAL DESCRIPTION 1.01 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE it is the intent of Coral Ridge -Collier Properties, Inc. there- inafter tailed "applicant" or "developer") to establish and develop a planned unit development on approximately 2,104•acres I of property located in Collier County, Florida, just north of the City limits of Naples. It is bordered on the west by the Gulf of Mexico and on the east by U.S. Highway 41 (Tamiami Trail). The northern boundary of the property is Vanderbilt I Beach Road. The southern edge of the property is bounded by Seagate Drive. It is the purpose of this document to provide the required detail and data concerning the development of the property. 1.02 NAME [ The development will be known as PELICAN HAY. 1:03 LEGAL DESCRIPTION IAll that fractional part of Section 32, lying South of Vanderbilt Beach Road; and all of Section 33, lying South of Vanderbilt . Reach Road and best of State Road 45 (U.S. 41)t all in Township 48 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. AND ALSO, all of Section 4, lying Test of State Road 45 (U.S. 41); all fractional parts of Government Lots 1 and 2, Section St all fractional part of Section 8; and all of Section 9, lying West of State Road 45 (U.S. 41), excepting therefrom the South 70 feet of the Southeast 1/4, and the South 70 feet of the East 258.25 feet of this Southwest 1/41 all in Township 49 South, Range 25 East, Collier County, Florida. 1.04 TITLE TO PROPERTY I The southern 300 acres of the proposed development are owned by Coral Ridge -Collier Properties, Inc. The northern 1,604 acres are under option as described in Exhibit W. Evidence of Control of Property. 1.05 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY AREA The general location of PELICAN BAY, the current zoning classifi- cations of surrounding properties, and nearby land developments are illustrated by Exhibit "B", Vicinity Map. t:. • 1-1 The project site contains approximately 2,104 acres of property With approximately three miles of frontage along the Gulf of j Mexico. At the time of this application the property was zoned 11 GRC, RM-1 and RS-4. Certain portions along the western edge of the property were designated "Special Treatment (ST)* as shown on Exhibit 130, Vicinity leap. 3.06 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION Elevations within the project site range from sea level to approximately nineteen (29) feet above sea level as shown on i Exhibit "E', Topography Map. l The soil types of*the site are shown on Exhibit "!", Soils Map and are discussed in detail in Section 20.B.6 of the Application for Development Approval of a Development of Regional Impact. The vegetation on the site is shown on Exhibit "G`, Vegetation Map and is discussed in detail in Section 20.9.1 of the Appli- cation for Development Approval of a Development of Regional Impact. f 1 i f f : f 1-2 a a= 007 ta 68 yA! The purpose of this Section is to generally describe the project plan of the development and delineate the general conditions that will apply to the entire project. GENERAL PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT The general plan of development of PELICPsi HAY is for a planned residential co:amunity including a mixture of single and multi- faadly dwelling units with cormercial areas, golf course, -school sites, governmental facilities sites, neighborhood and comity parks and protected beaches and wetlands. GULT-FRONT LAND The applicant recognizes the importance of the availability of Gulf -front land for the use of those persons residing within the PELICAN BAY development and for use by the general population of Collier County. The applicant also recognizes the importance of setting aside large areas which are environmentally sensitive. When the applicant receives all local, state, federal or other regulatory agency development permits, including fill permits, and complete development is permitted in accordance with this ordinance as adopted, the applicant shall satisfy the requirements for Gulf -front land use for the residents of PELICAN BAY and the general Collier County population in the following ways: The residents of PELICAN HAY: When the above condition is stet, the applicant shall file covenants on approximately 530 acres of uplands, wetlands and open water areas, which are environ- mentally sensitive, including approximately ore -and one -quarter atles of beachfront imxiediately north of Clan Pass. The.use of this land will be reatsicted by covenants for preservation, conservation and limited recreational use and this area is Identified on the project davelopment map as the area labeled 'Conservation'. General Collier County population: When the above condition is met, the applicant shall convey approximately 36 acres, which includes three-quarters of a mile of beachfront imme- diately south of Clam Pass to Collier County. This conveyance will contain a covenant restricting its use for a public beach with related recreational activities and in the event that development or fill permits are modified or withdrawn at any- time during the development process without written consent agreement between the applicant and Collier County or in the event that Collier County violates the provisions of the covenant restricting the use of the beach for a public beach with related recreational activities, then and in either one of those events the ownership of the property shall revert to the applicant. • The applicant shall reserve a minimum of two (2) acres within the southern portion of Group 4 upon which Collier County may conatruct a parking lot in oonnection with any county con- structed accessway to the 36 acres of Gulf -front land. The applicant will•convey the 2 acres of Group 4 properties to Collier County at the time Collier County constructs a beach accessway. jc. When the above condition is met, the applicant shall develop# on approximately five (5) acres located at the northwest corner of PELICAM BAY adjacent to Vanderbilt Beach Road and the Gulf of Mexico.approximately 120 parking spaces and then convey the same to Collier County for public beach access purposes. [ The accomplishment of 2.03(a),(b) and (a) above being contingent 'upon the conditions of 2.03 being mat,and the transfer of dwelling units from the ST areas and the placing of conservation zoning thereon being in contemplation of the conditions of 2.03 being met and the applicant being allowed to develop 98 acres of wetlands. in the northwest corner of Group 4= it is specifically understood that, in tre event said conditions are not met and the applicant is not allowed to develop the 98 acres or any part thereof, then to the extent that applicant is not allowed to develop any part of the 98 acres heretofore described, it is the intent of the applicant to apply for a modification to this POD document to allow the applicant to develop an equal amount of the Conservation area as Group 4 property. 2.04 SPECIAL TREATMENT CST) REGULATIONS ( The adoption of this document shall constitute satisfaction of ` the "SPECIAL REGULATIONS FOR (ST)-AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSI- TIVITY" and the transfer of the applicant's development rights fro= "ST" lands to "non-ST" lands,•in compliance with the applicable sections of the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County to permit development as herein described. l 2.05 SITE PLAN APPROVAL l When site plan approval In required by this document the following procedure shall be followed: t a. A written request for site plan approval shall be sub- mitted to the Director for approval. The request shall in- clude materials necessary to demonstrate that the approval of the site plan will be in harmony with the general intent and purpose of this document, will not be injurious to the �• neighborhood or to adjoining properties, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. Such material may in- clude, but is not limited to the following, where applicable: t 2-2 l ' eoac .007 1) Site plans at an appropriate scale showing proposed placement of structures on the property= provisions for Ingress and egress, offstreet parking and offstreet loading areas, refuse and service areas; and required yards and other open spaces. 2) Plans showing proposed locations for utilities hook-upf 3) Plans for screening and buffering with references as to type, dimensions, and character= 4) Proposed landscaping and provisions for trees proteoted by County iegulations= and 5) Proposed signs and lighting, including type, dimensions and character. 2.05 LRND USE Table 1 is a schedule of the intended land use tyres, with approximate acreages and total dwelling units indicated. The arrangement of these land use types is shown on Exhibit "C", Site Plan. Variations in acreages shall be permitted at final �. design to accommodate topography, vegetation and other site conditions. The specific location and sise of individual tracts and the assignment of dwelling units thereto shall be submitted to and approved by the Director at the time of Master Plan approval of each development phase as required by the Collier County Subdivision Regulations. 2.07 FRACTIONALIZATION OF TRACTS a. When Coral Ridge -Collier Properties, Inc. sells an entire tract or a building parcel (fraction of a tract) to•a sub- sequent owner, Coral Ridge -Collier Properties, Inc. shall provide to the Director for approval or denial prior to the sale, a boundary drawing showing the tract•ind the building parcel therein when applicable and in the case of a residential area, the number of dwelling units of each residential group assigned to the property being sold. If approval or denial In not issued by the Director within 10 working days, the submisoion shall automatically be approved. b. In the event any residential tract or building parcel is sold by any subsequent owner, as identified in Section 2.07(a), in fractional parts to other parties for development, the subsequent owner shall provide to the Directorr for approval j or denial, prior to the sale of a fractional part, a boundary 11 drawing showing his originally purchased tract or building parcel and the fractional parts therein and the number of dwelling units assigned to each of the fractional parts. I 2-3 I tou 007 ma 71 The drawing shall also show the location and site of access to those fractional parts that do not abut a public street. If approval or denial is not issued by the Director within ',• 10 working days, the submission shall automatically be approved. �.• c. In the event a commercial tract or building parcel is sold by any subsequent owner, as identified in Section 2.07 (a), in fractional parts to other parties for development, the subsequent owner shall provide to the Director for approval or denial prior to the sale of a fractional part, a boundary drawing showing his originally purchased tract or building parcel and the fractional parts therein. The drawing shall C also show the location and size of access to those fractional parts that do not abut a public street. If approval or denial is not issued by the Director within 10 working days, the submission shall automatically be approved. d. The developer of any tract or'building parcel must submit at the time of application for a building permit, a de- tailed plot plan for his tract or parcel. Such plot plan shall show the proposed location of all buildings, access roads, offstreet parking and offstreet loading areas, refuse and service areas, required yards and other open spaces, L' locations for utilities hook-up, screening and buffering, signs, lighting, landscape plan, other accessory uses and structures and in residential areas, the distribution of dwelling units among the proposed structures. 2.09 IMSIDENTIAL The information hereinafter provided identifies each residential group; the total acreage per group and the total dwelling units per group. a) Group 1'parcels have a total of 278 acres. A maximum of 600 dwelling units will be placed on Group 1 parcels in accor- dance with Section 4, except as provided in Section 2.10. ll b) Group 2 parcels include 371 acres. A maximum of 2314 dwell- ing units will be placed on Group 2 parcels in accordance with Section 5, except as provided in Section 2.10. f cj Group 3 parcels include 135 acres. A maximum of 1606 1 dwelling units will be placed on Group 3 parcels in accordance with Section 6, except as provided in Section 2.20. i d) Group 4 parcels include 343 acres. A maximum of 5000 dwelling units will be placed on Group 4 parcels in accordance with Section 7, except as provided in Section 2.20. i� t ' 2-4 = 007 w 72 TABLE 1 PELICAN SAY ' • li m USE SCREDULE APPROXIMATE MMMJM LAND USE TYPE ACREAGE NO. OF D.O. RESIDENTIAL Group Group 2 371 2324 Group 3 135 2606 Group 4 343 5000 COMMERCIAL 1 ' Area 58 r neighborhood 21 t C0=2unity 26 PUBLIC FACILITIES Utility 19 I l Schools 45 (also included in Group 2) Major Public Roads 112 , t Government Administration ` /Community Park 20 (also included in Group 2) IOPEN SPACE S RECREATION Conservation Area 570 L Golf Course, Tennis Club s Golf Club 171 Neighborhood Parks 20 (also included in Residential j areas) TOTAL 2,104 Acres 9600 2-5 ea�c '007 7J 2.09 PROJECT DENSITY The total acreage of the PELICAN BAY property is approxistately 2,104 acres. The maximum number of dwelling units to be built on the total acreage is 9600. The number of dwelling units per gross acre is approximately 4.5. The density on individual parcels of land throughout the project will vary according to the type of housing placed on each parcel of land. 2.10 PERMITTED VARSATIONS OF DWELLING UNITS Each tract shall be permitted to be developed with the gumimam number of dwelling units as assigned by Sections 2.06 and 2.02 provided that the applicant may increase the maximums by not more than lot; and provided further that the total dwelling units for the entire project shall not exceed 9600. The Direc- tor shall be notified in accordance with Section 2.07 of such an increase and resulting reduction in another tract so that the dwelling units will be balanced at 9600. 2.11 DEVELOPtMiT SEQUENCt AND SCMWULING The applicant has not set "stages" for the development of the property. Since the property is to be developed over an esti- mated 26 to 34 year time period, any projection of project development can be no more than an estimate based on current marketing studies. The estimate may of course, change depending upon future economic factors. Exhibit •I" indicates, by year, the estimated absorption of units (by unit type) and the approxi- mate population of the project (asauming full occupancy) for the estimated 26-34 year development period. 2.12 RECREATIONAL FACILITIES SCREDULE The applicant shall cause the following recreational facilities to be constructed subject to obtaining all permits. The schedule for development of these facilities relates -to the issuance of building permits according to the following table. Ron -compliance with this schedule will result in withholding of additional build- ing permits until compliance is achieved. BUILDING PERMITS FOR NOT I03iZ TBAN s FACILITY OR SITE 400 Units 700 Units 1600 units Golf Course 9 holes 9 holes Clubhouse w/Pool* X a Tennis Courts Boat Launch/Boat Dock** Z Boardwalk X Nature Trail X Neighborhood Parks** ,Government Administration 5 acres per each 1,000 units for Site/Community Park Site*** first 4,000 Units 2-6 '&=;.-7 1 r ,. I*Clubhouse for golf and tennis combined - 3,000 square feet minimum. **Neighborhood parks to total a minimum of 20 acres. Boat launch/ boat dock is included as a part of the neighborhood parks. ["***Government administration site/cor=unity park site to be a maximum of 20 acres. • 2.13 P14CMD14ENT OF ORDINANCE , Both the County and the developer, with knowledge that the long range development plan permitted by the ordinance will not be complete for a period of 28 to 34 years, recognize that excep- tions, variances, or amendments to this ordinance may be necessary in the future. Obviously, there ray be changes in planning techniques, engineering techniques, transportation methods, and other factors that would warrant this ordinance being amended 1 to meet standards of the time. All petitions or requests for j1 exceptions, variances and amendments shall conform with the procedures existing at the time of the application for the ex - caption or amendments. 2.14 TREE REMOVAL j All clearing, grading, earthwork, and site drainage ikrk shall be performed in accordance with the approved PCD site plan and all applicable codes. Prior. to any such removal, a site clearing plan must be submitted to'the Director for review and approval • to insure that said removal shall be carried out under proper forestry management principles. Protected trees shall be flagged, clearly marked and/or fenced during periods of construction so as to eliminate or minimize their damage. 2.1S DEFINITIONS Definitions shall be as contained in the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County. 2-7 w 007 nun 75 SECTION III UTILITY SERVICES TO PELICAN BAY • • 3.01 GENERAL The Pelican Bay Improvement District was created by action of the Florida Legislature in 1974. The specific law creating the district is Chapter 74-462 of the Florida Statutes. The district is a political subdivision of the State of Florida charged with the specific responsibility to design, finance, build, operate, and maintain (1) sewerage system (2) potable water system and (3) surface water management and control systeir- ihe law provided for a Board of Supervisors of the Polican Bay Improvement District to carry out the duties delegated to it. The law established the original five members of the Board of i Supervisors as appointed by the Collier County Commission. Those individuals will hold office until there is an election amng the qualified electors of the District to determine membership on the Board of Supervisors. The Board of Supervisors, in order to carry put the duties and responsibilities assigned to it, was granted certain powers and authorities by the Legislature. Specifically, the district, through the Board of Supervisors can enter into contracts; borrow moneys issue bonds; assess lands for special taxes; pro- vide special user assessments; own and acquire interests in land= • employ professionals and other necessary persons to carry out the duties; and, if necessary bring legal actions. The Legis- lature of the State of Florida specifically expressed that the purpose of the district was to "facilitate development" of utility services. IA copy of the Pelican Bay Improvement District Act, Chapter 74-462 of the Florida Statutes, is attached hereto as Exhibit I "$ - a) Water Supply and Treatment Facilities The Pelican Bay Improvement District is charged with the responsibility of providing a water system for the PELICAN ,.BAY project. b) Sewerage Treatment Facilities The Pelican Bay Improvement District is charged with the responsibility of providing a sewerage system for the BELIC7►N SAY project. 3-1 i�• 007 78 i c) Water Management Control Facilities L The Pelican Bay Improvement District is charged with the responsibility of providing water management and control. 3.02 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION . i j Solid waste collection for the PELICAN SAY project will be handled by the company holding the franchise for solid waste collection for the county. . 3.03 ELECTRIC POWER SERVICE Florida Power and Light Company will provide electric service ( to the entire project. 3.04 TELEPHONE SERVICE Telephone service will be supplied to the PELICAN BAY project by United Telephone Company of Florida. 3.05 TELEVISION CABLE SEP.VICE The PELICAN BAY project falls within the franchise areas of two television cable companies. Those companies are the South Florida Cable Television Corporation of Bonita Springs and the Radio Television Centre of Naples. �3.06 EASEMENTS FOR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES On -Site utilities such as telephone, electric power, TV cable service, wastewater collection water distribution, etc. shall be installed underground. Except that electrical feeder lines serving commercial and other high use areas, water pumping stations, lift stations, transformer banks, etc. shall be per - matted above ground. Easements shall be provided for all utility purposes. In areas that must be cleared for utility construction, a special effort shall be made to protect the maximum number of tress. Said easements and improvements shall be done in accordance with the subdivision regulations. 1 I ' j 3-2 i e eocac 007 r 77 I C SECTION IV GROUP 1 4.01 PMMOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations for the areas designated on Exhibit "CO, Site Plan, and Table 1 [ as Group 1 parcels. 4.02 MAXIMUM MELLING UNITS A maximum number of 600 dwelling units may be constructed in all of the Group 1 parcels combined except as permitted by Section 2.10. 4.03 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered, or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the followings A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures 1) Single Family detached dwellings. 2) Parks, playgrounds, playfields and comm*nly awned open space. 3) Water management facilities. C B. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures Reduirin_g Site Plan Approval 1) Non-commercial boat launching facilities, and multiple l docking areas not to exceed one per dwelling unit. r 2) P.ecreational clubs, intended to serves the surrounding l residential area. 3) Churches, schools, and child care centers when accessory to the church or school. C. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures 1) Private boat docks with or without boat hoists, on water front lots, not protruding more than five (5) t feet into the water, except if such waterbody bus a width of one hundred (100) feet or score, the dock may protrude not more than twenty (20) feet into such water body, providing, however that no boat is used as a residence. 4-1 r 007 78 I r 2) Customary accessory uses and structures, including pri- vate garages. 3) Signs as permitted by the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County. 4) Model homes shall be permitted in conjunction with the promotion of the development. Such model homes shall be permitted for a period of two (2) years f== the initial use as a model. The Director may authorise the exten- sion of Such use upon written request and justification. 4.04 REGULATIONS 4.04:01 GENERAL: All yards, set -backs, etc. shall be in relation to the individual parcel boundaries. 4.04.02 MIN=HUM LOT AREA: 10,000 square feet. 4.04.03 MINIMUM LOT NZDTHs A. Corner Lots - Ninety-five (95) feet as measured at the front yard setback -line. B. Interior lots - Eighty (80) feet as measured at the front yard setback line. 4.0 4.0 4 WH IMMI YARDS: A. Front Yard - 30 feet. B. Side Yard - 7 1/2 feet one story, 10 feet for two stories. C._ Rear Yard - 25 feet except that for screen enclo- sures the rear yard may be reduced to 15 feet. D. AU yards abutting a street shall be front yards. Four-sided corner lots shall have two front and two side yards: Five or more sided corner lots shall have two front, two sides, and remaining yards shall be rear yards, with the rear yards' being those farthest from the abutting streets. 4.04.05 NINIMUlI FLOOR AREAS A. One story - 1,000 Square feet. B. Two story - 1,200 Square feet. 4.04.06 OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS: One parking apace shall be required for each dwelling unit and such space shall be located within the building setback line. 4-2 e c 007 racy 79 t I4.04.07 XAMMM ssXGHrs Thir�tt30) feet above finished grade of lot. Accessory I• b-2 .T_i_ limited to twenty (20) feet above finished • grade of lot* i• t i t 1 i.. jj It i 4-3 a�ac: 007 ram'. 80. SECTION 4 GROUP 2 • 5.01 PUMSE The purpose of this Section is to not forth the regulations for the areas designated on Exhibit "C", Site Plan, and Table 1 as Group 2 parcels. 5.02 MA IMM DWELLING UNITS A maximum number of 2314 dwelling units nay be constructed in [ all of the Group 2 parcels except as permitted by Section 2.20. 5.03 USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the followings A. Principal Uses: 1) Single family units are permited as individual structures or as combinations of up to and including six (6) single family attached units per structure. Such unit types as single family attached, duplex, patio, cluster • attached, cluster detached, villa attached, villa de- tached and zero lot lines are permitted. 2) Parks, playgrounds, playfields and cass7, ly owned open space. [ 3) :eater management facilities B. Principal Uses ReSHLring Site Plan Approvals 1) Non-commercial boat launching facilities and multiple t docking areas. I 2) Recreational clubs, intended to serve the surrounding residential area. i3) Churches, schools, child care centers, and governmental administration buildings. 1 4) Convalescent homes, rest homes, homes for the aged, adult foster homes, children's hones, rehabilitation centers and licensed skilled nursing facilities# each unit shall count as one-third (1/3) of a dwelling unit ,. in accounting for the dwelling units assigned in 5.02 r above. r 5-1 e, 007 81 C. Permitted Accessory Uses and Struatur*se 1) Pr1rate boat docks with or without boat hoists, an waterfront lots, not protruding more than five (5) . feet into the waters except if such waterbody has a -. width of one hundred (100) feet or more, the dock may protrude not more than twenty (20) feet into such . waterbody, providing, however, that no boat is used as a residence. 2) Customary accessory uses and structures, including private garages. 3) Signs as permitted by the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County. 4) Model homes shall be permitted in conjunction with the I promotion of the development. Such model homes shall be permitted for a period of two (2) years from the ` �- initial use as a model. The Director may authorize the extension of such use upon written request and justification. 5.04 REGULATIONS 5.04.01 NININUN LOT AREAS A minimum area of 2600 square feet per dwelling un t shall be provided in some combination . of individual lots and contiguous common open space, excluding private and public roads. .. S.04.02 NINrMUN LOT WIDTRs A. Minimum individual lot (envelope) width for each dwelling unit related to a structure containing ' at least two (2), but not more than six (6) dwelling units shall not be less than twenty (20) feet measured between the side lot lines at the required front setback line. ja. Minimum individual lot width for a single detached unit structure shall not be less than forty-five f (45) feet measured between the side lot lines at Ithe required front setback line. 5.04.03 NINIMUN YARDS A. From tract boundary lines, right-cfway lines and/ or from the edge of the gutter of a private road, twenty-five (25) feet. B. Distance between structurese 1) between any two principal structures there shall be a combined rinia yard of 1/2 the sum of their heights but not less than twenty (20) feet. 2) Between any two accessory uses there shall be a combined minimum yard of twenty (20) feet. c. In the case of clustered buildings with a common architectural theme, these distances may be less provided that a site plan is approved in accordance. with Section 2.05. 5.04.04 MA=MOX U=CHT OP PRINCIPAL AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURBS: A. Principal Structures: Thirty (30) feet above the finished grade of the lots. D. Accessory structures shall be no higher than twenty (20) feet above the finished grade of the lot. 5.05.03 MINIMM FLOOR AREA: Those principal use structures whIch are Identifled in Section 5.03.A shall be as follows; One (1) story structures shall not contain less than eight hundred (800) square feet and two (2) story structures shall not contain less than twelve hundred (1200) square feet. 5.05.06 orr-STREET PARRIMGs Those principal use structures which are identIM3 in Section 5.03.A. shall contain a minimum of two (2) spaces per dwelling unit. The Director may permit a lesser number of parking -spaces to be paved when circumstances indicate infrequent use. However, those unpaved spaces shall be grassed and re- served for future paving. - 5.04. 07 Ol?-STREET PARR MG LANDSCAPIM Landscaping shall be provided as required by the __boning Ordinance of Collier County. 5-3 e�ai 007 rug 83 SECTION VX GROUP 3 6.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations �. for the area designated on Exhibit "C', Site Plan and Table 1 as Group 3 parcels. 6.02 MAXIKUH MELLING UNITS L A maximum number of 1686 dwelling units may be constructed in all of the Group 3 parcels combined except as permitted by I Section 2.20. r 6.03 USES PEMUTTED ` No building or structure, or part -thereof, shall be erected, j altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or part, for other than the Collaring: A. Principal Uses: i1) Multi -family residential units including garden apartments. 2) Those uses permitted in Group 2 when developed in accordance with Section 5.04. 3) Parks, playgrounds, playfieids and ocmmonly owned [ open space. 4) Water management facilities. B. Principal Uses Requiring Site Plan Approval: 1) Non-co=ercial boat launching facilities and multiple docking areas. • [ 2) Recreational clubs, intended to serve the surrounding residential area. j 3) Churches, schools, and child care centers. lj 4) Convalescent homes, rest homes, hems for the aged, j adult foster homes, children's hoses, rehabilitation 1 centers and licensed skilled nursing facilities= each unit shall count as one-third (1/3 of a dwelling unit in accounting for the dwelling units assigned in 6,02 1 ' above. j 6-1 1 e c 007 w . 81 C. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: 1) Private boat docks with or without boat hoists, on. waterfront lots, not protruding more than five (5) feet into the water; except if such waterbody has a width of one hundred (100) feet or more, the dock may protrude not more than twenty (20) feet into such waterbody, providing, however, that no boat is used as a residence. 2) Customary accessory uses and structures, including private garages. 3) Signs as permitted by the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County. 4) !model homes shall be permitted in conjunction with the promotion of the development. Such model homes shall be permitted for a period of two (2) years from the initial use as a model. The Director may authorize the extension of such use upon written request and justification. REGULATIONS 6.04.01. MINIMUM LOT AREA: One (1) net acre. 6.04.02. MINIMUM LOT WIDTH: ISO feet as measured at the front yard setback line. 6.04.03 MINIMUM YARDS: A. From tract boundary lines, right-of-way lines and/or from the edge of the gutter of a private road, thirty-five (3S) feet or one-half (1/2) the height of the structure, which ever is greater. B. Distance Between Structures 1) Between any two principal structures - one-half (1/2) the sum of their heights but not lass than thirty (30) , feet. 2) Between any two accessory uses - one-half (2/2) the sum of their heights but not less than twenty (20) feet. In the case of clustered buildings with a common architec- tural theme, these distances may be less provided that a site plan is approved in accordance with Section 2.05. i 6.04.04. MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF PRINCIPAL AND ACCESSORY STRLACTUM' A. Four (4) stories above the finished grade with option of having one (1) floor of parking beneath the allowable four (4) stores. 8. Accessory structures shall be limited to a maximums of twenty (20) feet above finished grade of•the lot. 6.04.05. MINIMUM LIVING AREA OF PRINCIPAL STRUCTURESt Those principal use structures which are identified in Section 6.03.A. shall contain a minicun of seven hundred and fifty (750) gross square feet of living area per dwelling unit ( within principal structure. 1. 6.04.06. OFF-STREET PARKINGt Those principal use structures which are identified in Section 6.03.A. shall contain a minimum 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit. The Director may permit a lesser number i of parking spaces to be paved when circumstances indicate infrequent use. However, those unpaved spaces shall be grassed and reserved for future paving. 6.04.07 OFF-STRkST PARKING LANDSCApim • Landscaping shall be provided as required by the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County. - i - _ i 1.' 6-3 c 007 ow 8U I SECTION vII GROUP 4 7.01 PURPOSE : The purpose of this Section is to not forth the regulations for the areas designated on Exhibit "C", Site Plan, and Table.l as Group 4. t7.02 MAXIMUM 1X7ELI IG UNITS A maximum number of 5000 dwelling units may be constructed in r all of the Group 4 parcels combined except as permitted by i Section 2.10. 7.03 USES PERMITTED No building or structure, or part•thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water need, in whole or part, for r other than the followings 1. A. Principal Usess 1) Multi -family residential buildings. 2) Those uses permitted in Group 2 when developed in Eaccordance with Section 5.04. 3) Those uses permitted in Group 3 when developed in r accordance with Section 6.04. ` 4) Parks, playgrounds, playfields and commonly owned open space. I 5) Water management facilities. t 6) Existing non -co mercial plant nursery. l B. Principal Uses Requiring Site Plan Approval 1) Recreational Clubs intended to serve the residents of PELICAN SAY. r 2) Churches, schools and child care centers. l 3) Civic and cultural facilities. l 4) Hotels and motels, maximam of 1500 units. Each hotel or motel unit shall count as one-third (1/3) of a dwelling unit in accounting for the dwelling units assigned in 7.02 above. r-;7 007 w 87 5) Private clubs intended to serve the residents of PELICAN SAY. E 6) Convalescent homes, rest homes, homes for the aged, adult foster homes, children's homes, rehabilitation centers and licensed skilled nw aing facilities, z each unit shall count as one-third (1/3).of a dwelling unit in accounting for the dwelling units assigned in 7.02 above. C. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: 1) Private boat docks, with or without boat hoists, on waterfront lots, not protruding more than five (5) feet into the water: except if such waterbody has a width of one hundred (100) feet or more, the dock may protrude not more than twenty (20) feet into such waterbody, Cproviding, however, that no boat is used as a residence. 2) Hon -commercial boat launching facilities and multiple docking areas. 3) customary accessory uses and structures, including private garages. 4) Signs as permitted by the toning Ordinance of Collier E County. 5) Model dwelling units shall be, permitted in conjunction with the promotion of the development. Such model units shall be perssltted for a period of two (2) years from the initial use as a taodel. The Director may authorise the extension of such use upon written request and justification. i I 7.04 REGULATIONS 7.04.01. MINIMUM LOT AREAS One (1) net acre. I7.04.02. MINIMUM LOT WIDTHS 150 feet as measured at the front yard not back line. 7.04.03. MINIMUM YARDS, A. From tract or development parcel lines, right-of-way lines and/or from the edge of the gutter of a private road, fifty (50) feet or one-half (1/2) the height of the • structure, whichever is greater except that detached accessory structures shall be not back 20 ,feet or 1/2 of the height, whichever is greater. [ 7-2 B. Distance between structures - 1) Between any two principal structures - one-half (1/2) the sum of their heights but not less than fifty (50) feet. 2) Between any two accessory uses - one -:half (2/2) the sins of their heights but not less than thirty (30) feet. C. In the case of clustered buildings with a common architectural theme, these distances may be less provided that a site plan is approved in accordance with Section 2.05. 7.04.04. MAXIMUM MIGHT OF PRINCIPAL AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES' A. Principal structures: Two hundred (200) feet above finished grade of the lot. B. Accessory structures shall be limited to a maximum of twenty-five (25) feet above finished grade of the lot'.. - except for roof top recreation facilities. 7.04.05. MINIMUN"LIVING AREA OF PRINCIPAL STRVCTURESs Those principal use structures which are identified in Section 7.03.A. shall contain a minimum of seven hundred and fifty (750) gross square feet of living area per dwelling unit within principal structure. 7.04.06 OFF-STREET PARKING: Those principal use structures which are identified in Section 7.03.A shall contain a minimum of 1.5 parking spaces per dwelling unit. The Director may permit a lesser number of parking spaces to be paved when cir- cumstances indicate infrequent use. However, those unpaved spaces shall be grassed and reserved for future paving. 7.04.07 OFF-STREET PARKING LANDSCAPING* Landscaping shall be provided as required by the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County. 7-3 Ear 007 ra 89 SECTION VIII f 8.01 PURPOSE ■ The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations �• for the area designated on Exhibit "C", Site Plan, as Coif Coarse. r 8.02 PEMTTED USES AM STRUCTURES No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, j altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the followings A. Permitted Principal Uses and Structures l 1) Golf Course 2) Golf Clubhouse 3) Tennis Courts [ 4) Tennis aubhouses 5) Transient lodging facilities not to exceed 25 units. 6) Water management facilities. i Be Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures [ 1) Pro -shop, practice driving range and other customary accessory uses of golf courses, tennis clubs or other trecreational facilities. 2) Small commercial establishments, including gift shops, . golf i tennis equipment sales, restaurants, cocktail lounges, and similar uses, intended to exclusively serve patrons of the golf course or tennis club or other permitted recreational facilities, subject to the provisions of the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County. I3) Shuffleboard courts, swiamning pools, and other types of facilities intended for recreation. 4) signs as permitted in the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County. 5) Maintenance shops and equipment storage. 1. 6) Non -Commercial Plant Nursery. tv 007 am .8� 8.03 PLAN APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS Plans for all principal and all accessory uses shall be sub- mitted to the Director who will review these plans and approve their construction. Ali construction shall be in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. The perimstor boundary of the overall golf course tract shall be recorded in the same manner as a subdivision plat. A. General Requirements: 1) overall site design shall be harmonious in terms of landscaping, enclosure of structures, location of access streets and parking areas and location and treatment of buffer areas. 2) Buildings shall be setback a,minimam of fifty (50) feet from abutting residential districts.and the set- back area shall be landscaped and maintained to act as a buffer zone. 3) Lighting facilities shall be arranged in a wanner which will protect roadways and neighboring properties from direct glare or other interference. „ 4) A site plan shall be provided-sbowing pertinent struc- ture locations and landscaping. - 8.04 MAXIMUM IMIGAT Thirty-five (33) feet above the finished grade of the lot within 150 feet of any district restricted to thirty (30) feet or less in height, and forty-five (45) feet elsewhere within the district. 8.05 xminmi OFF-S"=MCT PARKING As required by the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County. 8.06 OFF-STREET PAMING LANDSCAPING Landscaping shall be provided as required by the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County. etc 007 nay ,11 1 ' r SECTZON ZX ` NSIMMORHOOD C010MRCIAL 9.01 PORPOSE The purpose of this Section is to not forth the regulations for the area designated on Exhibit •C" as Neighborhood Commercial. The Neighborhood Commercial area is intended to meet the local neighborhood shopping and personal service needs of the our - rounding residential area. Retail stores permitted are inten- ded to include primarily convenience goods which are usually a [ daily necessity for the residential neighborhood. 9.02 USES PFJWTTED I' No building or structure, or part•thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: . l) Automobile service stations without repairs in accor- dance with applicable zoning regulations. ' 2) Baker shops - including baking only when incidential to retail sales from the prestises. 3) Banks and financial institutions. 4) Barber and beauty shops. i5) Bicycle sales and service. 6) Bookstores. 7) Delicatessens. 0) Drug stores. 9) Dry cleaning. 10) Family apparel shops. 12) Florist shops. 12) food Markets. • 13) Gift shops. lit) Hardware stores. �, 9-1 25) Ice cream shops. 26) Laundries, self-service only. 17) Legitimate theaters - Motion picture theaters - not ' including drive-ins. 18) Liquor stores. 19) Meat markets. f20) Mcdical and dental clinics. 21) Music stores. l 22) Post offices. 23) Professional offices. 24) Rapair shops - Radio, T.V., small appliances, shoe. [ 25) Restaurants - not including drive-ins. 26) Residential dwelling units in accordance with Section'* 7.04 and requiring Site Plan approval, provided that the total number of dwelling units within the P wcm HAY project area does not exceed 9600 dwelling units. 27) Any other commercial use or professional service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Director determines to be compatible in the district. 28) dater management facilities. B. Permitted Accessory Ones and Structures. I 1) Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the uses permitted in this district. r 2) Signs as permitted by the toning Ordinance. 9.03 MINIMUM LOT AREA fNone 9.04 MINIMUM LOT VTXDTH I None 9-2 �� 007 -93 9.05 i 9.06 9.07 C j 9.08 9.09 I 9.10 9.11 i 9.12 i 9.13 9.14 j. . .9.15 MINIMUM YARD REQUIREMENTS A. From tract boundary lines - thirty five (35) feet (except that buildings shall be permitted over water in the lake areas subject to site plan approval). B. From residential tract boundary lines - fifty (50) feet. BUILDING SEPARATION All buildings shall be separated twenty-five (25) feet or one- half (1/2) the sum of their.heights whichever is greater except that in the case of.clustered buildings with a common architectural theme these distances may be less provided that a site plan is approved in accordance with Section 2.OS. MINIMUM FLOOR AREA OF PRINCIPAL STRUCTURE 1000 square feet per building on the ground floor except that free standing specialty structures of nationally recognized standard size less than 1000 square feet shall be permitted when site plan approval has been received. MAXIMUM HEIGHT Thirty-five (3S) feet above the finished grade of the lot. MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING AND OFF-STREET LOADING REQUIREMENTS As required by the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County. MINIMUM LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS As required by the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County.' LIMITATIONS ON SIGNS As permitted in the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County. LIGHTING Lighting facilities shall be arranged in a manner which will protect roadways and neighboring properties from direct light. STORAGE There shall be no outside storage or display of merchandise. UTILITY AREAS Utility areas, including trash receptacles, shall be completely screened from the view of customers and adjacent property owners to a height of 6 feet above ground level. MAXIMUM NET LEASABLE FLOOR AREA . 50,000 square feet. 9-3 c -ac .007 em. 94 SECTION Z COMUNITr AND AREA COIMRCIAL 16.0t PURPOSE The purpose of this Sections is to set forth the plan and regu- lations for the areas designated on Exhibit "C", Site Plan, as Community Commercial and Area Commercial. i 10.02 USES MKITTED S No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Usess C1) Antigua shops 2) Appliance stores 3) Art studios 4) Art supply shops 5) Automobile parts stores 6) Automobile service stations without repairs in accor- dance with applicable zoning regulations. 7) Avning shops 8) Bakery shops 9) Banks and financial institutions 10) Barber and beauty shops 11) Bath supply stores 12) Bicycle sales and services 13) Blueprint shops 14) Bookbinders 15) took stores 16) Business machine service 17) Car wash 18) Carpet sales = not including storage or installation 19) Child care center subject to site plan approval 20) Churches and other places of worship subject to site Plan approval 21) Clothing stores 22) Cocktail lounges 23) Commercial recreation uses 24) Commercial schools 25) Confectionery and candy stores 26) Delicatessens 27) Department Stores 28) Drug stores 29) Dry cleaning shops 30) Dry goods stores 31) Electrical supply stores 32) Florist shops eW QO? flu95 33) Fraternal and social clubs, alcoholic beverages subject to provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. 34) Funeral Homes 35) Furniture stores ' 36) Furrier shops 37) Garden supply stores - outside display in rear 38) General offices 39) Gift shops ' 40) Glass and mirror sales - not including installation . 41) Gourmet shop 42) Hardware stores ` 43) Hat cleaning i blocking ` 44) Health food stores 45) Hobby supply stores 46) Hospitals 47) Hotels 48) Ice cream stores r 49) Interior decorating showrooms and office [ 50) Jewelry stores 51) Laboratories - film,research and testing [ 52) 53) Laundries, self-service only Leather goods 54) Legitimate theaters 55) Liquor stores 56) Locksmith l 57) Markets, food ` 58) Markets, meat 59) nedical clinics 60) Millenery shops 61) Motels 62) Motion picture theaters not including drive-ins 63) Museums 64) Music stores 65) New car dealerships - outside display permitted 66) News stores 67) Office supply stores 68) Paint and wallpaper stores 69) Pet shops 70) Pet supply shops 71) Photographic equipment stores 72) Pottery stores ' 73) Printing, publishing and mimeograph service 74) Private club, alcoholic beverages subject to the pro- visions of the Zoning Ordinance. 75) Professional offices 76) Radio and television sales and service 77) Research and design labs 78) Residential dwelling units in accordance with Section j 7.04 and requiring Fite Plan approval, provided that the total number of dwelling units within the PELICAN t t. SAY project area does not exceed 9600 dwelling units. w 10-2 Ems: 007 a. W 79) Rest homes and sanitoriums 80) Restaurants, not including drive-ins 91) Shoe repair . 92) Shoe stores 93) Shopping centers 84) Souvenir stores , s IS) Stationery stores 86) Supermarkets 87) Tailor shops 88) Taxidermists 89) . Tile sales - ceramic the 90) Tobacco Shops 91) Toy shops 92) Tropical fish stores 93) Variety stores 94)' Vehicle rental - automobiles only 9S) Veterinarian offices and clinics - no outside kenneling C 96) Watch and precision instrument repair shops 97) Drapery shops 98) Upholstery shops [. 99) Bait and tackle shops 100) Fire stations 101) Any other commercial use or professional service which is comparable in nature with the foregoing uses and which the Director determines to be compatible in the ' district. 202) Water management facilities. B. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: i1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the uses permitted in this district. 2. Signs as permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. 10.03 MINIMUM LOT AREA t None 20.04 MYNIMUM LOT WIDTH None 10.05 MINIMUM YARD MOUIR8 MM Buildings shall be not back a minimum of fifty (50) feet plus one (1).foot for each two (2) feet of building height above fifty (So) feet from all parcel boundaries except that buildings shall be permitted over -water in the lake areas, subject to Site Plan approval in accordance with Section 2.05. • 10-3 e . 007, acE 97 10.06 BUILDING SEPARATIOW All buildings shall be separated fifty (50) feet or 1/2 the r ' sum of their heights whichever is greater except that in the case of clustered buildings with a cosmwn architectural theme z these distances may be less provided that a site plan is approved in accordance with Section 2.04. 10.07 MINIMUM FLOOR AREA OF PRINCIPAL STAOCTURB 1000 square feet per building on the ground floor except that free standing specialty structures of nationally recognised standard sise less than 1000 square feet shall be permitted when site plan approval has been received. 10.08 MAXlrtart AEIGBT 1 • None 10.09 MINIMUM OFF-STREET BAP.RING AND OFF-STREET_LOADING REQUIREMENTS As required by the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County. 10.10 11INIMUM LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS As required by the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County. 30.11 MUTATION ON SIGNS As permitted by the Zoning Ordinance of Collier County. 10.12 MERCHANDISE STORAGE AND DISPLAY Qni*as specifically permitted for a given use, outside storage or display of merchandise is prohibited unless screened fzrna view to a height -of six (6) feet above ground level. 10.13 lUMM M NET LEASABLE FLOOR AREA A. Comennity rcial - 210,000 square feet B. Area Cosmrcial - 500,000 square feet 10-4 t= .007 W , 0$ SECTION XI CONSERVATZON AREA 11.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Section is to not forth the regulations ' for the area designated on Exhibit •C", Site PlaA# as [ Conservation Area. 11.02 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTMMS 1 No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered, or used or land or water used, in whole or in part, r for other than the following: t A. Principal Uses PAquirin4 Site Plan Approvals 1. Nature trails including boardwalks. t 2. Boat Trails l 3. Boat docks (non-cowercial boat launch facilties only no permanent docking) 4. Paths and bridges to provide access from the uplands • to the beach for pedestrians and minor maintenance equipment. S. Beach sun shelters 6. A marine research laboratory 7. Other activities for recreation, conservation, and preservation when approved by the Director. I . B. Water Management Facilities B. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the uses permitted in this distzict. 2. Signs as permitted in the zoning ordinance. 11.03 CONSERVATIO9 AREA (XMERS=P AND MAIMTERANCE A. Approximately 36 acres of the Conservation Area lying month of Clam Pass and west of Outer Clan Bay shall be conveyed to Collier County for public beach use and maintenance in accor- dance with Section 2.03. H. The pelican say Improvement District, a non-profit property owner's association or other entity will be granted the authority and responsibility for enforcing the applicable convenants, in accordance with Section 2.03 governing the approximately 229 acres of beachfront and other uplands, 277 acres of water area, and 129 acres of wetlands. This entity will be responsible for planning, control, supervision and maintenance of this area. ex� 007 nw1DO asmaN xis UTILITY AREA [ 22901 PURPOSE ' The purpose of this Section is to set forth the regulations r for the area designated on Exhibit "c", Site Plan, as 'Utility Area. l 22.02 PERMITTED USES AND STRUCTURES l No Building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, I altered, or used, or land or water used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Potable water treatment and distribution facilities. I 2. Sanitary waste water collection treatment and disposal facilities. 3. Utility services equipment, storage and maintenance. • 4. Utility services offices. S. Lawn or golf course maintenance shops and equipment storage. I G. Any other use associated with maintenance or utility services when approved by the Director. l7. Water management facilities. jB. Permitted Accessory Uses and Structuras: 1. Accessory uses and structures customarily associated i with the uses permitted in this district. 2. Signs as permitted in the sassing ordlinance. i 12.03 MINIM YARD REQUIREMENTS l None 12.04 MAXXXMI HEIGHT None ' 12.OS M MIMMI FLOOR AREA ' None - 12-1 w 007 amIDi• . SECTION )all DRVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS 13.1 ENVIRONMENTAL AND NATURAL RESOURCES A. Air Quality The -applicant for a construction permit for ttie constructic of any facility that qualities for complex air source permits under Chapter 17-2, Florida Administrative Code, shall obtain all necessary complex air source permits prior to the issuance by Collier County of construction permits for such a facility. B. Natural Resources 1. Prior to filling the approximately 98 acres of wetlands located in the northwest section of Group 4 properties, the applicant shells a. Convey approximately 36 acres (containing approximate 3/4 of a mile of beachfront) to Collier County, Flor: for a public beach; and set aside -by filing convenaw approximately 530 acres (containing approximately 1-7 miles'of beachfront) restricting in perpetuity this property for recreation, conservation and preservatic ' purposes; and b. Obtain all necessary permits from county, state and -federal agencies, including, but not limited to, giv3 reasonable assurance that the fill activity, develop- ment, and drainage syatem will not result in violatic of the applicable provisions of Chapter 17-3, Florida Administrative Code. Further, Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) shal3 be assured that negative water quality impacts to Inr and Upper Clam Bay will not result from the fill/ destruction and development of the area presently occupied by 98 acres of mangrove forest; and, c. Preserve the existing red mangrove fringe around all significant water bodies; and, d.'Stake the precise interface of the red mangrove fring prior to commencement of construction activities; and e. Limit the filling activities to approximately 98 acre and, f. Covenant the Conservation area for preservation, con- servation and limited recreational usess and, 13-1 g. Insure that filling activities shall not take place in . significant stands of red mangroves and shall not elimi- nate significant existing tidal creekst and, t h. Insure that no alteration or filling shall be ,on!htct*d below the two foot contour in this area before all • approvals for such construction are received. ' 2. The provisions of Section 2.03, GULF -FRONT LAND, are a part of this section. ( C. water Resources 1 1) Potable water supply Prior to the issuance of any construction permits by Collier County, the Pelican Say Improvement District (PBID) shall demonstrate to the Environmental Advisory Council, Water Management Advisory Board, Coastal Area Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners of Collier County and the South Florida Water Management District (STWMD) that the Floridan Aquifer, in this area, has sufficient capacity to most the water supply re- quirements of the proposed project's ultimate populati(%tt, and that this water withdrawal and reject water disposal - will not adversely impact areawide water quantity or quality. Reject water from the reverse osmosis process • shall not enter the upland surface water storage areas. 2) lion -Potable Water Supply a. Prior to tke issuance of canstrnctioa permits by Collier County, the applicant or Pelican nay Improvement District shall satisfactorily demon- strate to the Environmental Advisory Council, water / Management Advisory Board, Coastal Area Planning Commission and Board of County Comissioners of Collier County and the South Florida Water Manage- ment District (SFwMD) that the proposed project's water withdrawal for golf course irrigation will not subject shallow aquifer resources to salt -water intrusion and will not adversely impact areawide water quantity or quality. b. During the wet season, June 1 to October 31, irri-gation shall be permitted by withdrawal of water 1 from the lakes to a minimta level to be established by the water Management Advisory Board. 1 c. when the Coastal Ridge Aquifer is no longer over- stressed, the applicant shall be allowed to apply for a well permit for year round use of water from 1 the shallow aquifer. The condition of the shallow aquifer shall be determined by the Big Cypress Basin Board, the South Florida Water Management District and the water Management Advisory Board. 13-2 e 007 ru1D3 d. Existing permitted wells within PELICAN SAY shall be excluded from the provisions of 13. 1. C. 2. Ca) , (b) and Cc) above. D. Drainage Considerations: 1) Upland Areas a. Prior to the preparation of the final plans, the Water Management Plan prepared by the Pelican Say Improvement District shall be submitted to and approved by the Water Management Advisory Board. The Pelican Bay Improvement District shall provide necessary detailed drainage plans, studies and specifications to the Environmental Advisory Council, Water Management Advisory Board, Coastal Area Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners of Collier County and the South Florida hater Management District for approval prior to the issuance of construction permits by Collier County. b. Until such time as the tidal average 100-year flood elevations are established by HOD, the minimum building floor elevation shall be 10 feet above mean sea level. ' 2) Northwest Fill Area The Pelican Bay Improvement District shall provide necessary detailed drainage plans, studies and specifications to the 8nvironmental Advisory Council, Water Management Advisory Board, Coastal Area Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners of Colliertounty and the South Florida Water Management District for approval prior to the issuance of any permits by Collier County. Further, the county and the South Florida Water Management District shall be assured that negative water quality impacts to Inner and Upper Clam Bay will not result from the fill/destruction and development of the area presently occupied by 98 acres of mangrove forest. Lj 13-3 _.------•._ ..__._._.. _...___......�-•--- ••- , -. .. __.._.ram tim 007 n J6%JW 13.2 PUBLIC FACILITIES . A. Sewaae Treatment Facility The pelican Bay Improvement'District (BPID), created through a special act of the Florida Legislature in 1974, shall provide sewage treatment facilities for the proposed project. The Pelican Bay Improvement District shall provide necessary detailed plans, studies and specifications to the Environmental Advisory Council, Water Management Advisory Board, Coastal Area Planning ConQnission and Board of County Commissioners of Collier County and the Department of Environmental Regu- lation (DER) for approval prior to the issuance of permits. B. Water Treatment Facilities Water treatment facilities shall be provided by the Pelican Say Improvement District (PBID). The Pelican Bay Improve - sent District shall provide necessary detailed plans, studies and specifications to the Environmental Advisory Council, water Management Advisory Board, Coastal Area Planning Com- mission and Board of County Commissioners of Coiner County and the Department of Environmental Regulation for approval prior to the issuance of permits. .13.3 TRANSPORTATION A. Internal The internal roadway system of the roposed project, in- cluding signals and other intersect improvements shall be constructed by the applicant as indicated on Exhibits "s" and "1". Phasing and/or bonding for the ultimate im- provements shall be done in accordance with the Subdivision Regulations. B. External The applicant shall Improve Seagate Drive from its current two-lane design to a tour -land roadway between O.S. 41 and the most westerly constructed intersection of a PELICAN BAX.atreet -with-Seagate Strive. The responsibility of the applicant for four-laning Seagate Drive shall continue until the release of the last existing internal improvement bond for the project. The applicant shall also pay his proportionate share of the costs for the necessary inter- section improvements and signalizations along Vanderbilt Beach Road, Seagate Drive and U.S. 41, in accordance with the Subdivision Regulations. 13-4 UM 007 am V C. Additional Right -of -Way Seventeen and one-half (17-1/2) feet of additional right- of-way for Seagate Drive and Vanderbilt Reach Road shall be set aside within pelican Ray. This right-of-way will be included in the buffer strip until such time as it is required for roadway expansion. At that time, the appli- cant shall dedicate the additional right-of-way. D. Golf Cart/Road "E" Intersection 1 A grade separation shall be provided to separate the golf cart traffic from vehicular traffic where they con- flict at Roadway "E"•. i. E. Access to Surrounding Roads j Access to the surrounding major roads shall be limited to those access points shown on Exhibit "JO except as other- wise approved by the Coastal Area Planning Commission. F. connections to Seagate Rights -of -way for the extension of Nest Boulevard and Crayton Road into Pelican Bay shall be dedicated as part of •. platting. However, the constructibn of such connection shall not be permitted until authorized by the Board of County Commissioners. r� G. Landscaped Buffer Strip iA landscaped buffer strip, a minimum of 100 feet in depth, . shall be designated along the residential areas adjacent Q.S. 41, Seagate Drive and Vanderbilt Beach Road. 13.4 PUBLIC SEWICES A. Education Forty-five acres located in the vicinity of the community commercial parcel near Vanderbilt Beach Road and U.S. 41 will be offered to the Collier County School Board for use as a 25 acre middle school site and a 20 acre elementary school site. The 45 acres will be sold to the School Board at 501 of the January 1, 1977, appraised value plus 6% per year appreciation for each year after 2977. This offer will continue until January 1, 1990. After January 1, 1990, the applicant shall be permitted to develop as residential areas all parts of the 4S acres not purchased by the School Board. i� 13-s hoc 007 raiDff . B. Government Facilities T►renty acres located in the vicinity of the ComnmLty Com- mereial parcel near Vanderbilt Beach Road and U.S. 41 will be dedicated to Collier County in increments of five acres per each 1,000 dwelling units permitted for the first 4,000 • dwelling units permitted. The major portion of this area is r intended to serve as a community park with the minor portion to be used for such things as fire station, library, sheriff's substation, branch courthouse offices, auditorium, etc. Non - administrative uses such as open storage equipment yards l and other non -compatible government functions shall not be permitted within this site. The applicant shall be given the facilpties opportunity for thisto review tarea priorctural to their construe-lans for y tion. Should a requirement for use of a part of this 20 .acres develop prior to the above described dedication rate, the applicant will make available at the earlier date a 1 specific area for an iadmddiati specific use. C. Fire Protection C' 1) To Assure Adequate Fire Flow: j The applicant shall provide for the strategic placerent of fire hydrants as required by the Collier County Subdivision Regulations. Automatic sprinkler ■ystame, j water pumps, storage and pressure tanks shall be pxn- vided as required by county and state laws. 2) To Assure Adequate Fire Protection Services: A site for a fire station is included within the Governmental Facilities area identified in 13.4.E j above. 13.5 RECREATION AREAS A. Neighborhood Parks A total of twenty (20) acres shall be designated in the residential areas for use as neighborhood park.*. The applicant shall install the following improvements in each such parks one (1) unlighted combination softball/soccer field with backstop; one (1) 5000 square foot tot lot, two (2) unlighted tennis courts, twenty (20) paved parking j spaces. l B. Community Parks Twenty (20) acres as described in Section 13.4.n. above is �. available for use as a Community Park. This property is located adjacent to the school sites so that maximum utilisation can be achieved. I3-6 i ao7-=1�7 c. Gulf -front Land Thirty six (36) acres of Gulf -front land plan two (2) acres for upland parking shall be made available as described in Section 2.03 for public ownership. D. Reach Access Approximately five (5) acres lccated at the northwest corner of Pelican Bay adjacent to Vanderbilt Beach Road and the Gulf of Itaxico shall be developed into approxi- mately 120 parking spaces and then conveyed to Collier county after obtaining necessary permits. 13-7 007 ra�18 EXHIBITS SMIT11.l'c,l-mcs 1! A. Avtownt•s At Lwr J.•Kf :.Spot« "Go CC.M6erN Mist drKt np. •f • •. ar.-.roC.lc•9119aw It *CIO sst.•; �• September 22, 1976 k Mr. Grover Erickson Coral Ridge -Collier Properties, Inc. Post Office Box 2722 Naples, Florida 33940 Dear fir. Erickson: You have requested an opinion as to whether Coral Rid e- Collier Properties, Inc., has legal authority, ownership and control to apply for a zoning change in the form of a proposed planned unit development classification in Collier County, Florida, as to that portion of land delineated arc described in the zoning application. Coral Ridge -Collier Properties, Inc., does have such legal authority, ownership and control. Coral Ridge -Collier Properties, Inc., duly authorized under Florida law and earlier known and incorporated as 48-49-3a Land Corporation, is party to that certain "Land Option Agreement" of May 10, 1972, pursuant to which, as of this date: 1. Coral Ridge -Collier Properties, Inc., did in fact exercise its first option as optionee under the agreement and does now own those approximately S00 acres which constitute the land in option tract number 1 as set forth in the provisions of the contract; and 2. Coral Ridge -Collier Properties, Inc., holds an irrevocably granted, exclusivo option to those approximately 1,600 acres which consti- tute land described in the remaining option tracts which are set forth in the provisions of the contract. f etc 007 UO . Mr. Grover Erickson Page Two September 22, 1976 Coral Ridge -Collier Properties, Inc.. pursuant to paragrarh IS of the said Land Option Agreement, has and enjoys the pledged support of the optionors in procuring necessary zoning for the contemplated development of the lands covered by the agreement. Under Florida law; an exclusive optionee with the pledged support of the optionor, may proceed within the legal para- meters of the option agreement to apply for zoning changes affecting the optioned land. Since the optionors and Coral Ridge -Collier Properties, Inc., have already coopperated significantly in terms of both time and money, No optionors would be subject to the doctrine of equitable estoppel were they to challenge the zoning application on the basis of authority, control and ownership in the optionee. Moreouer, the State of Florida, by deeds. deed confirmations and disclaimers, all documents duly executed and recorded, has divested itself of any interest in or to those bottom lands, such as swamp and overflowed lands, which are situate in the property described in the planned unit development application. The State would be estopped from maintaining any claim thereto or any other action based upon such a claim, whether in regard to the zoning application or any other transaction or application. Therefore, Coral Ridge -Collier Properties, Inc.. does have and hold such ownership and control over the property as to consti- tute legal authority to apply for the needed zoning changes for the proposed planned unit development in Collier County. If you have any questions, please contact me. In the meantime, with best wishes and warm regards, I remain Very ruly yours, [ van Assenderp o the Firm �1IF y .0 i1• Ali ostii'����I� j.�. •'ii 4 0010 Rados ads ft" Masotti. �nu1n'� }.`,r�11111�1.� // ■ 11N ,game Hlam ��111111� Illy r, 1 � � Hfl QAY .•p N. a IrDOLn �� M.1•�•.HIL �•.r� �. D. M �rtM .' 1 ow t ,�'Q,•' C?TR Oo OUtfi16/111 M • ' " SAY PELICAN tsm woos- Daum wm mt� W. �..� SITE PLAN am SAM i PELICAN BAY ' cORAI ma -cam PNPCRM1. wIC. LOW BOUNDARY MAP DOCK 007 wil4 1M �• �H I•' b Min CLAM Ab Oa 'ma / Alb. Is . s ow cr r s r M , WMR '. s �. �.'.�'•`.i. '��'' !fir+ �.r 1,1000 KAWM MN WAG Is +s Q • w ' 4 m"Motm!l FMENO i 'r ,• 1�� M ® at um rw w+ ® tw KV40 oo...uM.w avrEll CLAW DW r+ 007.1i6 $OILS • u...1"�{.Twa"wf' EXHMIT '�' lull' on ru CLAM it. 6T Er, POO - pp .4 ot M POP OULY IPA .4 aw OT A % - a PLAIMMM v. wl x Ill'"PlIPOL POP" of % J:g bw im @TMM miIiiim vwmwnew KAM MAII Kam w"pa m 111.1011 al"llwim 1111111 NLACt 110141111 whosolle" 09 0 BLACK 8 WAIM ,.AM CRM CLAM lw it som 007 rAm 10 VEGETATION lzbb EXHIBIT Mw VELICA14 DAY IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT ACT & CHAPTER 74-461# l.A"b us savn.ws 1 &.dHAIpeM W PIT"y wY a N ((1'1 y � • � r ` �r w Yg iy� r 1pi • s�'�t R 8 a ��• IC N �► � Y •1 R � ! 7�w.: .•r 41-fili 15 lit 11 0,11 a I slum AIIAU-,�jj, •.� •� ff � _ u � i SC � b� r +dis p lei 64 .. 'Fla. :..rI� ..14 a RAJ] Jae d % O q noa—ff3 N My., .� • .� at z i.1a e11 e:;iS �P i w1 ilil t a ••9: gs Is O • .�sif 1 • wg � «� � � � •.. ,�d � � .� � eke �1941 s� 3 s ol I 89 � .s 9 a $ g 16 11 1111 lid Ir a - �Y�1.^� �1 .. r • EXHIBIT two T`�l� � �$ � �.�J y � t � 4 M � ' +a • a e �. to I r Y '.� i Z �R C A w Z. x a M a ro6.wi"�i8 ot.r ■�E�••w$a� ` Un "-0 a lob A as 06 o iw A •� a"�e CA .YMuy.t !; i•Yte .+� Q r4.a ice° 16 8T �I CwP. �O�P.wo. 1:2ea_• -O■ .,����w�..6Sg���M „�'4��8'� �� 8� R� ws � ..�a �3>��`+.+ � Fi g a � ■ � 0 8�$ A•..� � 8 A� � [CIA P. jr g a s v. di M 3 i ew 1i,�Mw a&� a Ma g � �lit 0.w$ �o •�: A.r� �i.r �i p,M 8 R w o o'J 111 • �i r rr •« A z I f.2 its w�rIc pas 8�¢� �8 7'� �j�Y�1:�7� � � P►' i � wiva • �a �+lse L�a1M. wli lit;H tw�.gaL� l F-2 .Y7 M ���lll jl_ij M s+Glsl COM ]vffl Rig3 fill 2 HIM t5r,' Y •^+ �` ~gg• o 8XHt01T uHn cux 007 m. mj2S . 12 a . y y . y i. .- w « i7 • r •-•ME Mw a $ •a • b� ° Ie • 41g 1�yp i �_ �+w�y dy • Y•ar � • a a all do 1r Y !p A .i ti yO p A i Y a �l fit' s O ; . R f : • : Ga o .4 itsru '8g�s��8 �$8A �� �•� -� �� 8 �� � � dZ gjO � .p g� wi• �' � � � QM F � � � $ s .% s y .. •o .rs �+rs8• I.C• ..• • •qq sf►3 � ��`�« � o w� � is s��• � T � � � �� r � �.E d�� ir ZI tOa.007 Ri `.�N ••�•��� "wM� 11; cM ^'8.a �"� 6" .r$ C� gi� ��� M � i$ Y •�Sj w .:�•- �d • w.�c wY �.a w •° �� r of � �� p-s , LIN EXHIBIT N 1: IRA fx I213 w w 423 '.EAS dwq E�sE i,3 a neap �g: gib# •t'"i .2 2 Sp Inc 114 •.P. Y '.q is 4 M wp R •� a" O a A Igv Y .� i � 7 O. � 4 " r f� ..Z • e � 1. Y I JAI 4m & jfj A 0 42 Hu a r IL 8 1.r ~ i. e r w � .� �[ ii • •� w yl „ it •xw B • • LM�M$ a .� r r.•. •�< ale .4 le "'s•9wiow tt &Y r� � .�•. Ag dd 83�eo. all t` a —a UT al, 11 t i•;« A s rq i l M i }� all v g ll E •O " .7 • '+� A g .q • " lie a •• let � q yYt • yw • e e1+�M x is �a Y j ° w8U is -all s•Lr• • � T. Ras $1W.4 ate` she . � ���'��'��� a y��g3 • alp gA Jr 3 �a 1 I-elly .. Y • . )3E t3 � HJU ,,�SYF t3flaw Lr.. � .,os �to F r]a¢!� .. € - -&a H4.3aYaa:.2a• Zax aq^ w � •ate — g Ci.xr. Ems.$ A�,a ha— A p t e ;4 4WISH ell aIS H A/«a�~pw �— � r`Cly •ybi a 9 • ii�i ie w��ywx la4ioi,1,14 •� •Xi a LtM3^e.p�s.SO��,YeLClog p A yA C• e �� i } `.Erw ,X CM• y�Y�� A .1 q J1 natal I UV Willi ;j s F o s E• 31 All Ilia' " I. 1132a I NZJ Iclo"jia 1111 is It211 M a cmb j . h o� .. a w �° R .s -3 a .� as � � � • • pxn do r +1+4 ss Y t�.a, oil r w» 9'4 y o $ e� as ri a wYjo wYikwaa we9� �$• �' !' A T M �aY g 1i's-��� ~ � PA at �� � � I<��fE orb o a g v a F-8 EXHIBIT m • 007 P=13 •fig ! .. • w y y « Jj O 0. w P T. " Ti t I.ir a a�+ i.4 � s� � � • y � wrA v e�~l ••I w �� INS oil 1 6. IL r s Y ;'�`� $��y � � ` �yy�� w� ; s � �• a�. l.$ IA del 1] wM '. Pc am' i ^ . , r� was • • g.� 1 y o $ � � � /i n sir s JQ t b o, '_figl� aN• ~a ilv I � a B A �� . R �1� do 7 i /MC w •� y Y ¢ •ss saa r j��� w� ..w,�y■ao■ a o 4 v■3eei .i 0 tee•^^�i e: 2�ar v CV Ida s�c�►2 -g = : $ A omig s�yt �r 7f��YyFw�y� �•.34 s�3 ■9 �3 • ��Y e all -I 116, ' � r � �'$p � "3 e.� •a�.a .ify a B� �� !-9 -007- u lt'.0 WINIT '"' vi C 3 : ~• ::�$�.. •�`q�,� pill], •„ J a y e O A � w a t h S. j� 11 A 4 3 �• 11 9• la C is s A 'C r e �MpQ + O � MI O Ai T. a s �ilia IRV � re, slat .2 -q .�wsi+A •MeaI ajai!ISO �ri� $. �C 41 1 . $TEST1112.14aric;'O a :14, N I V A al is IN 21 Uzi 14 ow va •.L ,� g S.� �, -Sol A4b Alga-5 b A* .��C"'S�.►�i w 7ap� MS �.. 4= �_,� 0 rft. .� •� a�.$ r��Q w i »•�w�A9° Y" ��, O 'YSfci i'_'`'�t Rn�tb �• ��+�•s' w � �'84s 'S�o°. �i1 a� �Y21^8 a �'�,s. ��ipr��' OOO°�•�� �' A i w A A 0.1 4 S O• N F�. M i� i O u i R al exx 007 u1t•8 ,fit dtr. U {aq� . s a.'Qf *1$'jj � °� t� r ja;81 ra JAW .1 • ff a .I $ � � x �, • 4•�a M3� r ,fig �s3s • M t R w a y$ :� A o e a 9 .? ei � ., t�• ~ E � r ._p =� B O4 1 pf �7 r� xF •�2 La A ..a. r A i � S 4 jQ( .� 4 x A i[• G4g tl . "�M YRS y 4.A Jr O i�g R=i �•�$ 8^a_•o•�E,$�Ee��,a„1i2E3SE�~q►•z•�`•gi=�i¢� .:Aa x .e.p.o.�o'�•o roL,w�� �..f►%•L— a YG �ag46 y�r.Y �rd .l�v e �°'�g�g�►�e��s j}p`a ° e'A e��.2 Es1•Rq... r R .ri O p Y O ri ... O O p w �{r r O r � O r A� .� � 7�� F T. • I• Ile- 11 .1111 1 A I j Sj gp � :•a8� q O.�igY`_•»l .�s$�gyIsis _21,12 IT be Ce a&• #»`a77}} oS« ig r0 31 TTTiii R • g�AYe"ae�awis¢g..4L. 26 C� ,�•A��gY 4• C. `.T�OSOq �d ���..na �''�f. '� •s3i��i�,�•�rt VA gill "'S zr. k;-Pjj 1;1211 iv I N. 00 ail all �.fj-a yAr H A� •RA+ • �M ♦� s«• • 3lr si► «SvJ lir- A•dE �o. �a0e ^ ..asi$� F-12 DWSIT "tM' Sol *g 487 ilia] Es s€ a $• ;TIE S totl Is I ..» ti S • A11 s o e�• oZ^ g • �i 0 S ILry N y •��3���C �� ` •�� Q �•� �� 0 l ASS grg o N 8 $'GaAs VLP a S••�� « Ers o'sill 73 g:� M �• ,} tlq.eZO� QYwl:Ar•RM`cFi T.•� ����S:a-�•L'pe��L�'2oso�$� s� �� - F-13 EXHIBIT "Iro exx 007 imi30 VII— Via` M- o• = ;a te ? o� "•11 1 �• 012 1.1V fa B] s 41 all y �'.' � R �°ti � w ii '� gaw a'EZ 3ja B�'•� Mc ��,8ry$r ^0.�p�yr�. M. w'oiH: 4. ��ii +� a �'g•�j(ii it ..00 .!,.q• •; to p A i g .. L� °.s�« 5 e�.wie.�i�'e'�o�'ri •''''*«`�J«��'� .. Z$ eoi`� !• .i f^� M M A•� a a .! r C� 'O g 01 16 1.2�,5•w = .`., E,$ ri.3 w a'�X Q e .l7� • ii s as Tj �Z Mav It IV �. � @ ��: •�� i �� j � a p.a �' '� AR s sir w • 7, r � y � � w a q M � � p � G � �► r O y MO 12 i • �. r a ,; �7 � � h s � v _ y C• x A w .2 w .i K lids O 'jM �, � • L A A ,! • � O .p O � � • r O � � w O � � y � 6 � � R ,� S� � ,�, Q S'► I. !! O -oil i tr =.,4 - IS'S.'r sl i i ftY y 0 .1 k �y , S. e ° ! I 1 �_ Q«... AA•■ A w 'O w Pi Pi w Y .. Y►:� °� ~ ~� O O �, 6 L,�t n I_ ���•�d� ..� i !« qD'w w .•.t t, 46 as ti 104 O w q jr �•�'AAI JAI it. �►�� a y•g �w=' Y` v ,��� P ��'�ge 9 is ba I a 11 A All y a AA w111.2 �.A sw 0yl Y l .23 Or .A w P So a son, b-1 $$$ .5 1 .2 a yIV:q w O O•� IV O 1.2 d w Y r vM o all vf el I I film] vIg i F-14 EXHIBIT "IN' i TL I it € — e' Aq taus,! sIS. tg ,� 8 Id fig ; Vas a w,4•"• F.f a� g.�i'� r'� qr �'�33 AI if it =fir a� .t s I:� a do vz— I'] eardos s Ilia yEXHIBIT Orx 007 rw13Z all I �ii Jill is I All Diu y w�. e9 w� j il a�,1i,4 8 � a j i 11?S. a��B»woo Sw: s b ll 11aYE-k i 06 d 'd „`+`ejs ey:9Mn''•N�$•d e� ��k� .J$ fie, Ta $ °'� st�+ 'ea I I DIY all 4 Y� O y Y Oir q a vs7G Y�' + ~ •, '_ 'O •e �' u �t = +� S �e o a 4o .. i� " Cv a Nt°5�.,'.5 :gi g N3a �� = ` r E .. oRM .w° 46 !�'e' �w9,�e �,� �e�A�A i• '�• r �� 3ym•i'$$° �° �'o '�til��s g« i�lag; q�=o «g yv� ��• '•a Na•�•r�L'�G�at► ! C c 3 €'� r e .�,�= Za5_«1 � i l 10 r •2K A '• i r R R may. r w ? " w" a q i �i <• C •. r ~ P �ii '� s b � "•• �g,�� �,$ • �s+ �9is'•SSrj a e s e T Q y 9 f 3 A *2i.S.Uz �_ Y A �r Jv•- • ii S !fyzj�j� O A A� O � g�� Y " �.�... '�r a,r w�O Q� A.�i r, r� Y� OO�.'_': � •�wr S 4�i' $� 3 �R 3 AaI: x?A3 : '`��;Y�ga »E•y.s A _w$gi�e.t&�a' 20 it *�.. Y O " �<yy. •�� y, eC C� M � � �� � � $ C ■ � � 0 .~. + C p C .C... » � .. A g M C M O � � w •. i C � � � � � 1 w � . .63 R ii v�.:M iJi �. -�r o7�w wawooL�..�wo�+�'. iG S.a»q+i r F-16 EXHIBIT fW' e�uc 007 =133 Ma �; 3s jZ s- gag, �.fL+s� ��Ogyp��A titp p �. 1g vtog i Is a a$ x `� � v � / »mow • sj�. o pp�,a s 3 I: p¢ H '.�: ° g • r„ FFsi I all; Ri s:` � � �;,�a� 3� �� ig �� y •���� •�� ����� a �� a IIl s•ra� s w CY�llAIa�. . �$ Lg � q Y 3 q� o e1 y M p� fi« — •M •► E ESES • j¢ .Jy to y'i Cp.fi It A 71■w0 Viya!• + d 5 swF 6i.R A w y �p•e b'i • M •p p a �.'3y • • • 4� f' Nye • $`.e * F i /� 3ff 1lliii ° ~��•oi«Pi � i�Aaw.eaeeis 3w Vgg9 wo« / os��w�/!9L •v Irrs$ ABU Ir 11iij O ,.� 'g �� r O r • c a� $� $ 8 g i S 10 r►+�m° L��'� / ya w it a.CP 1.1 — I I its 71 wq .$., use qce,� •Ee,.`iL'«�Yr «'�.. �30 1,' '1' � � o$ si'�� i � ••/ ea � y g " / i � `��S �'g.t �aj•.j� i e ������� ° � �� ° Sa j �•`� � � &�.Z,�v i a �.s.� 6 g ��'o ZgS� ZSo g=� �► � M� i it �g> i 4�rFg MaM � � � JA �• _ S I Bill" 1 F-17 EXHIBIT 'W.' dr a +�4 ppp Ays �G �j s j VI x f�Yir•���� � �ii � 1'.i � �pq y 1igs�'�i� R • • O � C d •• " A .�: � q • C .. 'e '� • a u r ; � •S_''i C I• 'r e s � '� % 1• �f 1 A a vb:� •• "•fit:V s06 -a a 7`v�•°V.�M, • Y x a •� d O x S ems. G .r lam•. u L 1 .� M M p i O '� ...�s • 3 + i! N 4 w e•Ms=•� �o �;.: 2,% s��c•�a•� IfoAy .+B ipil Is j gE �R'��8 "'• ��4,g a., .�/C a� �MAE 5 g.�=' �' � r •�• .: a« s O A �i R i M .•�. R"" R 1340.2w.R • A•.5 • .�•. F-18 I. EXHIBIT •�{•• ' a . I�I .�• t eacx : 007• r' A EQ5 /iiin.3f Wh�ivNi4Tlii�l.9�ii�ii'rl'.C;' :�2FiiiCilr`�'fL i..� . '.n.. �:. ., Ms.. ,�.. _ •.i : . ,r '•r.,• r •,.�.�� INSTR 5019M OR 5067 PG 3247 RECORDED 61142014 4:23 PM PAGES 5 DMGHT E. BROCK CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT PMWARBD BY AND IIt81TtW IX),, COUNTY FLORIDA PEUCAN BAY FOUNDATION REC $44.00 62Si PeUmn fay.Bouk-,d N&PICs, Florida $4108 Attu: Frank Laney SETBACK VARIANCE THIS SETBACK VARIANCE is made and .granted as of this 3o _ day of July , 2014, by the PELICAN BAY FOUNDATION; INC., a Florida not -for -profit corporation, whose address is 6251 Pelican Bay Boulevard, Naples, Florida 34108 (the "Foundation"), in favor of VICTORIA LYNN STRUMILLO TRUST, whose address is 6950 Verde Way, Naples, Florida 34108 (the "Strumillos"). WHEREAS, the Stnnnillos are the owners of the following described real property located within Pelican Bay ("Site 9"): Lot 9, Pointe Verde at Pelican Bay, Unit Twelve, as recorded in Plat Book 20, pages 45 through 46, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; an WHEREAS, Site 9 is subject to the Second Amended and Restated Declaration and General Protective Covenants for Pelican Bay recorded in Official Records of Collier County Book Ordinance 4442, Page 3381 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida, as amended and restated; and WHEREAS, Site 9 is further subject to the Declaration of Protective Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions of Pointe Verde at Pelican Bay recorded in Official Records Book 1776, Page 2015 of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida (the 'Pointe Verde Neighborhood Covenants"), as it may have been amended; and WHEREAS, the Pointe Verde Neighborhood Covenants include the following setback - restrictions in .Article V, Section .5.2(a): No part of any Dwelling Unit on Sites shall be located nearer than: 30 feet to the front Site line; 15 feet to the side Site line if a one-story Dwelling Unit; 25 feet to the side Site line if a two-story Dwelling Unit, 25 feet from the rear Site line, except that (i) rear setback lines on lakefront site shall be measured from the P.B.S.D. water management easement. No structures shall be placed within any easements. Section 5.2(b): Pool enclosures shall conform to the Dwelling Unit setback requirements except for Sites 1, 2, 3, 11, 12, and 13 on which the setback may be reduced to 15 feet from the rear Site line. WHEREAS, Section t1.x ©f the Pointe Verde Neighborhood Covenants allows the Declarant, by instrument filed of record, to modify or waive the covenants, conditions or restrictions set forth therein; and Attachment D 1 WHEREAS, the Foundation has been assigned by WCI Communities, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the successor to Westinghouse'Communities of Naples, I=, the Declarant) the right, power and authority to grant waivers and variances and also to amend various neighborhood covenants, including the covenants and restrictions in the Pointe Verde Neighborhood Covenants, said assignments being evidenced by instruments recorded in Official Records Book 3257, Page 2056 and Official Records Book 3496, Page 3065, both of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida; and WHEREAS, the Strumillos have requested a waiver from the Foundation that will result in a two (2) foot setback, instead of the required twenty-five (25) foot side setback along the eastern side of Site 9, and along the front, western side of Site 9, a waiver that will result in a twenty-five foot setback instead of the required thirty (30) foot setback according to Article V, Section 5.2(a) of the Pointe Verde Neighborhood Covenants for a pool deck, fence and screened pool enclosure encroachment (the "Variance'") in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to the Foundation by the Strumillos (the "Plans") an excerpt which is attached hereto and made a part. hereof marked, Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS,one hundred percent of the members of the Pointe Verde at Pelican Bay Neighborhood Association, Inc. have consented in writing to the Variance; and WHEREAS, the Foundation has agreed to grant to the Variance in strict accordance with the Plans; NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the foregoing recitals which are incorporated herein by reference, and for other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the Foundation does hereby grant the Variance in favor of Site 9, as limited by and in strict accordance with the Plans. This setback Variance is not intended to, and shall in no event be construed to (i) affect any other covenant in the Pointe Verde Neighborhood Covenants; (ii) affect f any other Site except for Site 9; (iii) allow encroachment of any other structures or improvements on Site 9 into the setback nor allow any other setback encroachments on Site 9 other than the above f mentioned encroachment as depicted on the Plans; or (iv) grant a waiver, vacation or abandonment of any easement, or to permit or allow the construction of any improvements within any easement. Further, notwithstanding the approval of the Foundation herein, the Strumillos (or their successors) shall be required to comply with any and all ordinances, regulations, and permitting requirements of Collier County .relating to construction of the proposed. improvements. This setback Variance shall run with the land -and inure to the benefit of the present and future owners of Site 9; provided, however,- that in the event that the encroaclimentAnd/or structure on Site 9 which is the subject of this Variance is destroyed or removed, voluntarily or involuntarily, this Setback Waiver shall be null and void and any new construction on Site 9 shall comply with the Pointe Verde Neighborhood Covenants, including the limitation contained in the setback requirements. The Strumillos, on behalf of themselves and their successors_ in title to Site 9, shall indemnify, save, defend and hold harmless the Foundation (including, without limitation, the Foundation's officers, directors, members, owners, employees, and agents) from j and against any and all losses, damages (including, without limitation, any and all consequential damages), costs, charges, expenses, claims, demands, causes of action, variances, trespasses, executions, and liabilities (including reasonable attorneys' fees and costs at all levels and/or negotiations) whatsoever, at law or in equity, whether in tort, in contract, or otherwise, which may be asserted or recovered against the Foundation (including, without limitation, the Foundation's officers, directors, members, owners employees and agents), whether asserted by suit, proceeding, defenses, counterclaims, set -offs or otherwise, arising out of, relating to or resulting from variance granted herein.st . (Remain&r of rage Intentionally Left Blank —Signatures Begin on Next Page) 2 !�rC��""F"`�w .,'_r .R., ; ;.+ ,•�,� e.,.<,'-*h�:T.^3','.-.:��'�i'!;X?'Wi,�"t".P'r6.;'"'at'z".KI"'Ca::�;`„�','�'C*^'i�'*.er"'A "'YIF',•�,.�.t.s!ui;.°;!1 ✓:.: �.:�`;' ° ..,' � r IN WTTNM WHERF&OtF, the Foundathon1as caused this insh went to be executed in its name and its cm-porate seal to be hereunto affixed, by its proper officers thereunto duly andwdiwdonthe day andyear first abovevniften. PtA a- 1 Signature STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) ss: COUNTY OF COLLIER ) PB UCAN BAY ATION, INC., a Florida not corporation By:.: James Hop eadt, Presi ent The foregoing instrument was acknowledged b ore me this JD day of 2014 by JAMES HOPPENSTEADIT residen of Pelican Bay Foundatio , Inc., a Florida not -for -profit corporation, on be of the.., o . e rsonally known to me or O has produced a driver's license. o OTARY PURUC 11�-iQ nt Name: My commission expires: (Notary Seal) use. A. IlVirroil', } Ne- oa��s: x:�c. ao;soir ,:� wwv,.r, norsioywrsa 3 I ;:.YY;+. t,t. �11.; .,W'.�\4 .^Y7 ts.,�...1N;A'.M:.<t4'�SY;.`a'n.�i+'�:. �iY.Y;ti' ,1 i'.^r.,n,5'vWykP.rfF+y:;Y.Y...,.�tX:�..ia`'�,�'i".�'1.�."t..b�°�w'.v'Y-K•ai?'.n�+�R�^eY,v'F-.Lam....�'�.�r'$�.'i'.^�'a����.':1u�.N`11�'* n.�.MiL'i�! !M!i;!�i'�J ^bi ,.. �$,"�`'J' .e: Y"f,•Er. ,. Acceptance of conditions contained in the foregoing Rear Setback Waiver: Witnesses: I STATE OF 1 LL{Y%Oi C ) COUNTY OF u�a ss: The f,Q regoing instrument was acimowle 201R by Donald R. Strumillo and.Victa have produced a driver's license as identifies, Donald h anuUo \V,f)46� Victoria SUMMiU0 me this 3 Dday of 9u / i) who are personi* .known to me or Co e-r County • COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergoy.net 28M NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239)252-2400 Pre -Application Meeting Notes Petition Type: i Date and Time: _I • ?p• �� ®) t z� Assigned Planner: Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project Information Project Name: NA%g PI. #• 74=DE2 • b Property ID #: 6ezrc;"F"56P11 Current Zoning: Project Address: b�..b City: b State:_ Zip: Applicant: • AgentName: Phone: _Z239' 2.B.16'77� Agent/Firm Address: Gty: State: Zip: Property Owner. Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: iii. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: VA — PL20150000006 Rev 1 6950 VERDE WAY DATE: 2/20/15 DUE: 3/6/15 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net Co er County Meeting Notes 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 0 • • -de- CoMer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT ZSW NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collieraov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 VARIANCE PETITION APPLICATION Variance from Setbacks Required for a Particular Zoning District LDC section 9.04.00 & Code of Laws section 2-83 — 2-90 Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER To be completed by staff PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Address: City: State: ZIP: Telephone: Cell: Fax: • E-Mail Address: Name of Agent: Firm: Address: City: State: ZIP: Telephone: Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: • BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 6/4/2014- Page 1 of 6 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliereov.net —e_ Co er County Z800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-63S8 PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (if space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: Section/Township/Range: _/_/ Subdivision: Metes & Bounds Description: Unit: Lot: Block: Total Acreage: Address/ General Location of Subject Property: ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N S E W Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: Front: Corner Lot: Yes ❑ No ❑ Side: Waterfront Lot: Yes ❑ No ❑ Rear: Chapter 8 of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public hearing advertising sign(s) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. Based on the Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising sign(s) immediately. 6/4/2014 Page 2 of 6 is • • Co er� y COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT ZSW NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 2S2.2400 FAX: (239) 2S2-63S8 ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at htti3:/Iwww.colliergov.net/Index.as-px?Dage=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City State: ZIP: • Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City State: ZIP: 4-1 NATURE OF PETITION On a separate sheet, attached to the application, please provide the following: 1. A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased property; when existing principal structure was built (include building permit number(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. 2. For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: ,a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. • 6/4/2014 Page 3 of 6 CONT County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collieraov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 2S2-63S8 • b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. • c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. • e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. • f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? 4. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official YC interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, please provide copies. 6/4/2014 Page 4 of 6 • • • • • CAr County COLDER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 28M NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergoy.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for. Variance Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below with cover sheets attached to each section, incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW • OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) Pre -Application Meeting Notes 1 Project Narrative Completed Addressine Checklist1 Conceptual Site Plan 24" x 36" and one 8 l4 " x li" co py Survey of property showing the encroachment (measured in feet) 2 Affidavit of Auth ri ati n signed and notarized 2 Deeds/Legal's 3 Location map 1 Li I Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend included on aerial 5 ❑ Historical Survey or waiver request 1 Environmental Data Requirements or exemption justification 3 E= Once the first set of review comments are posted, provide the assignec planner the Property Owner Advisory Letter and Certification 1 _U ❑ ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans "Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. �/� ❑ ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 6/4/2014 Page 5 of 6 —e_ Co*,r County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Z800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collieraov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following reviewers: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet Addressing: Annis Moxam Graphics: Mariam Ocheltree ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Historical Review ❑Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application Meetin Sign -in Sheet ❑ Immokalee Water/Sewer District: Conservancy of SWFL• Nichole Ryan El Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Transportation Pathways: Stacey Revay ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock Engineering: Alisen-BradfaM Transportation Planning: John Podczerwinsky ❑ Other: ❑ Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLengen FEE REQUIREMENTS EA'Pre-Application Meeting: $500.00 L�Variance Petition: • Residential- $2,000.00 o Non -Residential- $5,000.00 o 5a' and Subsequent Review- 20% of original fee Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.00 0 After The Fact Zoning/Land Use Petitions: 2x the normal petition fee ❑ Listed Species Survey (if EIS is not required): $1,000.00 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Applicant Signature Printed Name Date 6/4/201a Page 6 of 6 • • • • • • Pre -Application Meeting Sign -in Sheet Pl. #: - 00dt� Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ David AnthonyEnvironmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net ❑ Summer Ara ue Environmental Review 2S2-6290 summerbrownarague@colliergov.net ❑ Alison Bradford, P.E. Engineering Services 252-6820 alisonbradford@colliergov.net ❑ Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5165 markburtchin@collfergov.net ❑ George Cascio Utility Billing 2S2-5543 georgecascio@colliergov.net Heidi Ashton Ccko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton@colliergov.net ❑ Kay Deselem, AICP Zoning Services 252-2931 kaydeselem@colliergov.net ❑ Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman@colliergov.net ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michaelgibbons@colliergov.net ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundlach@colliergov.net ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Services 252-5757 johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marclakendail@colliergov.net ❑ Reed Jarvi, P.E. Transportation Planning 252-5849 reediarvi@colliergov.net ❑ Stephen Lenberger Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger@colliergov.net ❑ Paulo Martins Utilities 252-4285 paulomartins@colliergov.net ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. En ineering Services 252-2911 jackmckenna@colliergov.net ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmclean@colliergov.net ❑ Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility Im act Fees 252-4215 ilbertmoncivaiz@colliergov.net 13. Michele Mosca, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2466 michelemosca@colifergov.net ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam@colliergov.net ❑ Mariam Ocheltree Graphics 252-2315 mariamocheltree@colliergov.net ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandyotero@colliergov.net ❑ John Podczerwinsky Transportation Planning 252-5890 johnpodczerwinsky@colliergov.net ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipoIlard@colliergov.net ❑ Fred Reischl, AICP Zoning Services 252-4211 fredreischl@colliergov.net Stacy Revay Transportation Pathways 252-5677 stacyrevay@colliergov.net ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Utility Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenblum@colliergov.net Michael Sawyer Zoning Services 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net ❑ Chris Scott Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergoy.net ❑ Daniel Smith, AICP Landscape Review 252-4312 danielsmith@colliergov.net ❑ Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-8400 scottstone@colliergov.net Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net ❑ Carolina Valera Comprehensive Planning 252-8498 carollnavalera@colliergov.net ❑ Kris VanLen en Utility Planning 252-5366 krisvaniengen@colliergov.net ❑ Jon Walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonathonwalsh@colliergov.net ❑ David Weeks, AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net 0 Kirsten Wilkie Planning and Zoning 252-5518 1 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net Name Representing Phone Email L RF Ro►^; Fx--V[E-�\! 2-SZ-z3Z. aji 'cl�9Um j'Ir�PA��olti o� y f ,., on . 5+° LI Ze�j- ,vi rwt 1-6 ai" I figfj YV4.1 i G� `� 176,,,t �`\fi� s drre c�-- Gam, -)ON C 14 M41\1 ` Com-, . A • 0 • n • �r Coder CMnty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT Z800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coflemoy.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 VARIANCE PETITION APPLICATION Variance from Setbacks Required for a Particular Zoning District LDC section 9.04.00 & Code of laws section 2-83 — 2-90 Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code PROJECT NUMBER PROJECT NAME DATE PROCESSED VA — PL20150000006 6960 VERDE WAY DATE: 2/20/15 DUE: 3/6/15 Rev 1 APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Don & Victoria Strumillo Address: 6950 Verde Way City: Naples Telephone:630.640.6700 Cell: E-Mail Address: dstrumillo@amsdirect.com Name of Agent: Christopher Kalina State: FL ZIP: 34108 Fax: Firm: Infinite Renovations LLC Address: 13114 Cardeto Ct City: Estero State: FL Zip: 33928 Telephone:239.961.2450 Cell: E-Mail Address: ckalina@infiniterenovations.com Fax: BE AWARE THAT COLLIER COUNTY HAS LOBBYIST REGULATIONS. GUIDE YOURSELF ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT YOU ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THESE REGULATIONS. 6/4/2014 Page 1 of 6 r. Co' er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coilleEgoy.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PROPERTY INFORMATION Provide a detailed legal description of the property covered by the application: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) Property I.D. Number: 68160000759 Section/Township/Range: 4 49 /25 Subdivision: 570400 - POINTE VERDE AT PELICAN BAY Unit: Lot: 9 Block: Metes & Bounds Description: Total Acreage: •52 Address/ General Location of Subject Property: 6950 Verde Way, Naples, FL 34108 Pointe Verde in Pelican Bay ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE Zoning Land Use N Residential Single Family S Tract Club Pelican Bay Golf Course E Tract Club Pelican Bay Golf Course W Right of Way Verde Way Minimum Yard Requirements for Subject Property: Front: 30 Corner Lot: Yes ❑ No Q Side: 10 Waterfront Lot: Yes ❑ No 0 Rear: 25 F of the Administrative Code requires that the applicant must remove their public vertising signs) after final action is taken by the Board of County Commissioners. he Board's final action on this item, please remove all public hearing advertising ediately. ,7 • 6/4/2014 Page 2 of 6 1Z 50 GY bounty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2300 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA -34104 www.collientov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 . ASSOCIATIONS Complete the following for all registered Association(s) that could be affected by this petition. Provide additional sheets if necessary. Information can be found on the Board of County Commissioner's website at http://www.collierg_ov.net/index.aspx?page=774. Name of Homeowner Association: Pointe Verde Homeowners Association Mailing Address: 6251 Pelican Bay Boulevard Clty; Naples State: FL Zip: 34108 Name of Homeowner Association: Pelican Bay Foundation Mailing Address: 6251 Pelican Bay Boulevard City: Naples State: FL ZIP: 34108 Name of Homeowner Association: The Club Pelican Bay Mailing Address: 707 Golf Park Dr City: Naples State: FL Zip: 34108 Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City: State: ZIP: • Name of Homeowner Association: Mailing Address: City., State: ZIP: NATURE OF PETITION On a separate sheet, attached to the application, please provide the following: 1. A detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of encroachment proposed using numbers, i.e. reduce front setback from 25 ft. to 18 ft.; when property owner purchased properly; when existing principal structure was built (include building permit number(s) if possible); why encroachment is necessary; how existing encroachment came to be; etc. I For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations, including any dredging and filling. 3. Pursuant to LDC section 9.04.00, staff shall be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner, and the Hearing Examiner shall be guided. in the determination to approve or deny a variance petition by the criteria (a-h) listed below. Please address the following criteria: a) Are there special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure, or building involved. 6/4/2014 Page 3 of 6 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.cgilieWM.net 5c;Zoo& County �y�}i,�ze^+wuya�i 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 b) Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request. c) Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant. d) Will the variance, if granted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land, building or structure and which promote standards of health, safety or welfare. e) Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings, or structures in the same zoning district. f) Will granting the variance be in harmony with the intent and purpose of this zoning code, and not be injurious to the neighborhood, or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare. g) Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of the regulation such as natural preserves, lakes, golf course, etc. h) Will granting the variance be consistent with the Growth Management Plan? 4. Official Interpretations or Zoning Verifications: To your knowledge, has there been an official interpretation or zoning verification rendered on this property within the last year? Yes Q No If yes, please provide copies. :7 • 11 6/4/2014 Page 4 of 6 U -AT CQ�cnty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2e(10 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coillencov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final. Submittal Requirement Checklist for: Variance Chapter 3 J. of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement Checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At time of submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 12 Ry Pre -Application Meeting Notes 1 Project Narrative r Completed 6d1ressing Checklist 1 r Conceptual Site Plan 24" x 36" and one 8 X " x 11" copy+= r Survey of property showing the encroachment measured in feet 2 r Affidavit of Authorization signed and notarized 2 r Deeds/Legal's 3 r Location map 1 rEl Current aerial photographs (available from Property Appraiser) with project boundary and, if vegetated, FLUCFCS Codes with legend Included on aerial 5 Q Historical Survey or waiver request 1 Environmental Data Requirements or exemption justification 3 Once the first set of review comments are posted, provide the assigned planner the Property Owner Advisory Letter and Certification 1 0 ❑ Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 1 r�El ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 6/4/2014 Page 5 of 6 COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.cotlieriiov.net r Coen County 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Planners: Indicate if the petition needs to be routed to the following reviewers: ❑ Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director ❑ Environmental Review: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet ■ Addressing: Annis Moxam Graphics: Mariam Ocheltree ❑ City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director ❑ Historical Review ❑ Comprehensive Planning: See Pre -Application Meeting Sign -In Sheet ❑ Irnmokalee Water/Sewer District: Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad County Attorney's Office: Heidi Ashton-Cicko Transportation Pathways: Stacey Revay ❑ Emergency Management: Dan Summers; and/or EMS: Artie Bay ❑ School District (Residential Components): Amy Heartlock ■ Engineering: Alison Bradford Transportation Planning: John Podczerwinsky ❑ Other: ❑ Utilities Engineering: Kris Van Lengen FEE REQU(REMENTS 0 Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 9' Varlan5p Petition: Residential- $2,000.00 o Non -Residential- $5,000.00 / o 50, and Subsequent Review- 20% of original fee �}/ Estimated Legal Advertising Fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.00 After The Fact Zoning/Land Use Petitions: 2x the normal petition fee 0 Listed Species Survey (if EIS Is not required): $1,000.00 All checks payable to: Board of County Commissioners The completed application, all required submittal materials, and the permit fee shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive �' — ---, Naples, FL 34104 Applicant Signature Don Strumillo Printed Name Date 2/(z/IS- • • • 6/4/2014 Page 6 of 6 1: NFINITE RENOVATION Collier County Government 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples FL, 34104 Planning Number: PL201S0000006 Site Address: 6950 Verde Way, Naples, FL 34108 To Whom It May Concern: We are requesting a variance approval for the construction of a pool screen enclosure for the Strumillo Residence at 6950 Verde Way, Naples, which is located in the Pointe Verde Homeowners Association in Pelican Bay. In compliance with the Collier County Variance Application, we submit the following: 1) Detailed explanation of the request including what structures are existing and what is proposed; the amount of the enavachmentproposed usingnumbers, i.e. reduce frontsetbackfrom 25ft to 18ft, when property owner purchased property,- when existing principal structure was built (include building permit numbers ifpossible); why encroachment is necessary, how existing encroachment came to be, etc RESPONSE: The Strumillos (via the Victoria Lynn Strumillo Trust) purchased the subject home in 2014. When they bought it, a pool, fence, and pool deck already existed on the property, having been there since 1997 when the home was built Portions of the current pool deck and fence sit within the setback for a pool enclosure, making the variance necessary. We are proposing to erect a screened pool enclosure and colonnade (which is required by the Pointe Verde Homeowner's Association when erecting a pool enclosure) around the pool and pool deck, in order to create a safe and enjoyable outdoor living space. The screen enclosure will sit approximately atop the existing pool deck and fence. The screen enclosure will require a reduction of the front setback from 30' to 24', and the side setback to be reduced from 10' to 2'. There is no encroachment on the rear setback. 2) For projects authorized under LDC Section 9.04.02, provide a detailed description of site alterations includingany dredging and filling RESPONSE: We are requiring a variance that will reduce the front setback from 30' to 24' and the side setback from 10' to 2'. The footprint of the new screen enclosure sits approximately atop the existing pool deck and fence, which is on the East side of the property and faces directly onto the fairway of the Club Pelican Bay golf course. A line of mature trees separates the property from the golf course fairway. Golf balls shot from the course are regularly found on the property including in the pool and on the pool deck, presenting a life safety issue for people using the outdoor space. 3) Pursuant to LDC Section 9.04.00, staff`' should be guided in their recommendation to the Hearing Examiner and the HeadngExaminershall beguided in the determination to approve ordenya variance petition by the criteria (a h) listed below - a Are there any special conditions and circumstances existing which are peculiar to the location, size and characteristics of the land, structure or buildinginvolved? RESPONSE: The home is in proximity to the tee box of hole number 2 of the Pelican Bay Golf Course, such that errant drives, which are evidently frequent, cause balls to enter the property, at high rates of speed. Balls have been frequently found in the pool, on the patio, and in the adjacent bushes and street These balls present a serious safety hazard for anyone utilizing the outdoor space and negatively affect the ability to enjoy the space without fear of incident Most properties that abut the course have similar screen enclosures as that being proposed. Additionally, there are two lakes within 200 yards of the home, and the Pelican Bay golf course is known to have alligators, which can cause harm to humans sitting in an open area. In addition to protection from balls shot off course, the screen enclosure will protect the pool and home from falling debris and branches from the large, mature line of trees immediately adjacent to the property, as well as dangerous, unwanted rodents and reptiles. A Are there special conditions and circumstances which do not result from the action of the applicant such as pre-existing conditions relative to the property which is the subject of the variance request? RESPONSE: The pool deck is original to the home and little has been done to modify or modernize the space since original construction. The Strumillos are a much younger and more active family than the previous occupant, who was over SO years old when he sold, and will spend significantly more time utilizing the outdoor space. The construction of a screen enclosure is necessary to ensure the safety of the family and their guests. c. Will a literal interpretation of the provisions of this zoning code work unnecessary and undue hardship on the applicant or create practical difficulties on the applicant? RESPONSE: A literal interpretation of the zoning code will require a significant decrease in safe, usable outdoor space and decrease the development of the property to the full advantage for the owners, whicjh would otherwise benefit the values of all homes in the neighborhood. d. Will the variance, ifgranted, be the minimum variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land building or structure and which promote standards ofhealth, safety or welfare? RESPONSE: Yes, the requested variance is at the minimum to fully develop the property for a safe use of the pool, pool deck and outdoor living space, as dictated by the footprint of the existing deck and fence. e. Will granting the variance requested confer on the petitioner any special privilege that is denied by these zoning regulations to other lands, buildings or structures in the same zoning district? RESPONSE: Other than granting a variance to the setback requirements, this request does not confer any special privilege on the homeowner, nor does it infringe on the privileges of other adjacent property holders. All of the neighboring property owners are in favor of the variance being granted as it allows the reconstruction to continue and bring the property value of the residence in line with adjacent properties, thereby benefitting the entire neighborhood. f. Willgranting the variance be in harmony with the intent andpurpose of the zoning code and not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare? RESPONSE: The variance is in accordance with the intent and purpose of the zoning code, which is promulgated to protect neighbors from unwanted and undesirable incursions. In this case, all 13 residents of Pointe Verde have provided written statements in support of this variance request Additionally, the President of the Pointe Verde Homeowners Association (an immediately adjacent neighbor), the General Manager of the Club Pelican Bay, and the Chairman of the Club Pelican Bay Board of Governors (who happens to be the neighbor directly across the fairway from the subject property, with a direct sight line to it) have also submitted their written approval of the variance request. The Pelican Bay Foundation has also formally, officially, and publically approved this variance in accordance with the Pelican Bay Covenants and Declarations. Finally this will not represent an undesirable incursion to the neighbors because most of them already have screen 41 enclosures such as the one proposed, and the enclosure will be constructed in strict compliance with the covenants and protections required by the Pointe Verde homeowners association g. Are there natural conditions or physically induced conditions that ameliorate the goals and objectives of regulation such asnaturalpreserves, lakes, golf course, etc? RESPONSE: The inclusion of the screen enclosure at the Strumillo residence will provide a safety measure for occupants and visitors to the residence from poorly shot golf balls. Additionally, golfers will be able to utilize the course to their full abilities without fear of causing accidental personal injury or property damage from their bad shots. A Willgranting the variance be consistent with the Growth ManagementPlan? RESPONSE: Granting the variance will have no negative effect on the growth management plan, and will allow the residence to be updated to the standards of the Pelican Bay community. The plans are consistent aesthetically with surrounding properties, align with the covenants of the Pointe Verde Homeowners Association, and are approved by the Pelican Bay Foundation. The proposed enclosure will increase the value of the property and therefore positively impact the value of other homes in the neighborhood. We respectfully request that this variance be approved by Collier County. Thank you in advance, Christopher J. Uina Infinite Renovations LLC. President & Director of Operations ,7 0 CoiUer County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.collierrov.net 29W NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 ADDRESSING CHECKLIST Please complete the following and email to GMD Add ressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressing personnel odor to ore -application meeting Please allow 3 days for Proc"eing. Not all items will apply to every project Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ CamivaUCircus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) Q VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) ❑ OTHER LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description maybe attached) Pointe Verde at Pelican Bay Lot 9 OR 2007 PG 1013 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, orassociate with, legal description if more than one) 68160000759 STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) 6950 Verde Way, Naples FL 34108 • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) N/A PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) N/A SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (liorexisdng projects/s<tes only) SDP - or AR or PL # 2015-0000006 VA — PL20150000006 Rev 1 6950 VERDE WAY DATE: 2/20/15 DUE: 3/6/15 • Scanned by CamScanner C& copy COLLIENCO N W60NERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.coiliergov.net 28W NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252--2400 FAX (239) 252 5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing In, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Pointe Verde Please Return Approved Checklist By: iF EMWI ❑ Fax ❑ Pemwg ly picked up Appilmd Namx Neal Horrell Ptmw 239-289-1368 EmaiUF= nhorrelfainfiniterenovatlons.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and Is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number 68160000759 Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folia Number Folio Number Apt Updated by: Dd; 15 IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED Scanned by CamScanner AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PL20150000006 I, Victoria Lynn Sr milo (print name), as TNstBe (title, if applicable) of the Victoria Lynn Strumilo Trust We dated January 21, 1994 (company, If a livable), swear or affirm under oath, that I am the (choose one) owner= applicant contract purchaser=and that: 0 1. I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. All answers to the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Neat Hovel and/or Christopher Kalne to act as our/my representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes. • If the applicant is a corporation, then it is usually executed by the corp. pres. or v. pres. • If the applicant is a Limited Liability Company (L.L. C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Company's `Managing Member." • If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. • If the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the 'general partner" of the named partnership. • If the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words was trustee". • In each instance, first determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust, partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of perjury, I declare that I have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated In It are true. �. 72.Ilr�iS Signature Date STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER 2 Ir / The foregoing instrument was sworn to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on �� (date) by L/I C Tv a=t ft C.!vt S-1�LURAI L.vo name of person providing oath or affirmation), as TRUST ex-1 who is onally known me or wh has produced (type of identification) as identification. STAMPISEAL gn re of ry Public ,N. Iwr NEALHORFaL MY OMASWN i EE 861M .: pcP F0. D9=rJ r 21, 2o16 VA — PL20150000006 Rev 1 earl• TvvmoM�rPv*UndwAn 6950 VERDE WAY IV DATE: 2120/15 DUE: 3/6/15 CADS-COA-081151155 REV 3/24/14 This Document Prepared By and Return to: Thomas B. Garlick, Esq. Garlick, Hilfiker & Swift, LLP 9115 Corsea del Fontana Way # 100 Naples, FL 34109 Parcel lU \umbcr: 68160000759 Warranty Deed INSTR 4967280 OR 5025 PG 3401 RECORDED 4/112014 9-10AM PAGES 2 DWlGHT E. BROCK. CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COLLIER COUNTY FLORIDA DOC@ 70 $19,250.00 REC $18 50 CONS S2,; 50 000,00 This Indenture, ~`lade this dac of i?-)eZA �,� 2014 AD Between Gerard T. Uht, Sr., a single man of the Counp• of Erie , State of Pennsylvania , grantor, and Victoria Lynn Strumillo, as Trustee of the Victoria Lynn Strumillo Trust u/a dated January 21, 1994 rtho,e aJJrrs� is 7020 High Grove Boulevard, Burr Ridge, IL 60527 of the Coum% of Du Page , state of Illinois , grantee. Witnesseth that the t' R,NNA [Gk. for and in .onsideration of the sum of ------------------------------------TEN DOLLARS ($10)----------- )ulL"K and other gaud and raluable consideration to 0RANTOR in hanJ raid be (AXN I FF. the receipt %%hereof I. iwrrht granted. bargamc.i and sold ul the said kXAN IEi, and C,K,AVII L- 1) heir,. SWLCe .iOrf sad aaa¢nn lore.cr the lolioulng Je,.aihcJ leod. irtuatr. (Site htkIll P1tICollier �tFloridaaw of VERDE AT PELICAN BAY, asrec recorded 9,OINTEin Plat Book 20, Pages 45 through 46, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. The Grantee shall have full power and authority to protect, conserve, sell, lease, encumber, manage and dispose of the property described in this instrument pursuant to Florida Statute Section 689.073. SUBJECT to zoning, building code and other use restrictions imposed by governmental authority, outstanding oil, gas, and mineral interests of record, if any; restrictions and easements common to the subdivision, if any; and real estate taxes accruing subsequent to December 31, 2013. And the Grantor hereby covenants with said grantee that the grantor is lawfully seized of said land in fee simple; that the grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey said land, and hereby warrants the title to said land and will defend the same against the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever; and that said land is free of all encumbrances, except taxes as set forth above. VA — PL20150000006 Rev 1 6950 VERDE WAY . DATE: 2120/15 DUE: 316/15 and dtc grantor does hereb% hill) %%arr; nt the title to said land. and %ill dewnd the same against la%%iui glans of all pc"ns .„„r i;e,.r :.._o•.: U:pl y: i'.<,:,.❑:. :.. ...;i'.. _ F ii, IML-_ W'arrantN Deed - 2 PArt el 11) %untlpri 68160000759 In NN it ness " here of. it).: !;a- k6:, i:i,n,.,, ­j h;, h---jJ the J.1% jffd t .&0% , II Signed. sea I d :ind deli% ?ftin our presence: Printed Name: Witn ,,ess Printed Witness State of Florida Gerard T. Uht, S�k, Vjdi:>- 2 151 I�omlh %twir Drj% r. 1. rot. Ilk It.;is5 County of Collier .2014 Gerard T. Uht, Sr., a single man r. driver's license Printed Name: Notary Public 21C3-DOI. • Is PWAPm W. Land Surveyors, Inc. s www.exactalandcom Toll Free 866-735.1916 • F 566-744-2882 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 6950 VERDE WAY NAPLES, FLORIDA 34108 SURVEY NUMBER: 1402.1384 FIELDWORK DATE V111=4 REVISION DATE(S): w42 2l2D mm) M-Ev-1 2/19/M al 14m IM4 TAW; filoma RY$ Wsy L I N 73'42' 10' E 40.00' (P) COLDERCOLA1TY N 73143127' E 39.90' (M) L2 N59'10'14'W9,58'(F) N 58'23vv W 9.54' (M) L3 N 39'20'00' E 105.GO (F) 04 sw nRC LOT 1 0 L4 N 39'33152' E 17.99' (P) R- 175.00}PIM) 1D/6952 L5 5 35'00'0(7 W 31.22' (P) L—I/2.3/yP)If12.24tO ' / 535-12149W31.10'(M) A-36946114".904448Y1W 5 2905'17' W, l 10.3.4M S 5 /^59/6'W, lIa3ZtW G2 L T 9 f? t'3y J R=50.00(PIM1 I; n I AW bg /& �M L><66.dByP) 66.84YM) � *-99'33'150M 993(722YM) N 12105'33'W, 76.35yP);%'t N /2IM36' W, 76.33yM) .i a °.ram LD/5770 > i j• asp 07 to �dy 2 STY. 19� Mi y I V R— 50 RlO Ft h,1 ' C R6 K950 SO' MR L- 39.77M 39.64YO sNO 10 A-453423(P)452506W 36.73IP i1Q: �O a °? �`�� 0N 39V5 0 t72' W, '(P) 7p ^ c 8 a A O N 3,0VW/' W, 36.61 W) 7) �' 6 % MCP. m . yyys99 C-4 � sy R-50.00t7W) G Y .U'hcjy l() W r' L— 106.56tP) 106.34W) S°y, G Non gg h� A 122°O754" 121'5135Ybt) O 561°1457't 67.52M �y j N N 5 61 2129' E, 67.40M O n J W N M o.. O.R.B. 1605 0- > LLI �ryti0 'GS 224 - 232 L NOTE: at)r' W LOT APPEARS TO re 50tWCED 5Y CrTY WATER AND 5EWER v • �• �3 Q 05 Q = C.U.E. - INDICATES COWER COUNTY UTtUTY E05EMENT > (p Q Q F.A.L. INDICATES PEDE.5TNAN ACCESS EASEM10 _ /, / ro 5ET5ACIC5 PROWDED BY COWER COUNTY '34 RIhC� L5#m2 � NO ID ♦�,� C•4 IDS/ 770 1LLm l!: l h"by 9M th� pla7 DItlM hanfW► domed has i 3a myubacdon, and AD 93e bWV/ His afire and Ohsf meals the ao 0 10 eo mr n* n Set byft FkddaBomd ofPyolbs ravajPlJi6M InChepA+rSJ 17d GRAPHIC �p ([a Feet) tlLe R.tde tM9 1 inch — 60' tL KEI TH A. STEPHENSON Slaft Cl Fb da Plolwbrrl Surveyor NaPPIN L1cMM Na VAH undTMr urMbr Pump odor dnn Intended.WldlaeWritten Neraraeer4 will be atdw Lb.S Sale ask andYadtwrt Lw ty tethe5urvayar. patheg I,wean rluP heCwNbuadte GNe ANYrI�Ib.9.— trte Anyaete 0",tbn IlreC.0fled FLOOD INFORMATION: POINTS OF INTEREST BY PERFORMING A SEARCH WITH THE LOCAL GOVERNING 1. PAVER DRIVEWAY OVER 15' U.E., C.U.E., AND PA.E. MUNICIPALITY OR W W W.FEMAGOV, THE PROPERTY APPEARS TO BE LOCATED IN ZONE X & AE (WITH A BASE FLOOD ELEVATION OF 9). THIS PROPERTY WAS FOUND IN COWER COUNTY, COMMUNITY NUMBER 120067, DATED 05/16/12. CLIENT NUMBER DATE 2/20/2014 4w all[ ' e AFFILIATE BUYER Don strumillo F L-TA � ' � MEMBERS i SELLER CERTIFIED TO: DON STRUMILLO —Alk C- v ¢' 1: Land Surveyors Inc. ��°°1V Th's is 1 of 2 and Is not valid withrwt all ac I Pa6. Suite -Ft M 66 7d 33913 f7afta P:Q lBF 7y37 11910fahwylALes Drive. Sucre I- Ft Nyere 0.33913 i RE O OF SURVEY 1402 384 f IIThis is page 2 of 2 and is not valid without all pages. REPORT LEGAL DESCRIPTION. SITE 9, POINTE VERDE AT PELICAN BAY, UNIT TWELVE, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 20, PAGES 45 THROUGH 46, INCLUSIVE, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA I JOB SPECIFIC SURVEYOR NOTES: THE CBANNG REFERENCE OF NORTH 16 DEGREES 17 MINUTES 50 SECONDS WEST IS BASED ON THE EASTERLY RIGM.Of WAY LINE OF VERDE WAY, LOCATED WITHIN POINTS VERDE AT PEUUIN RAY. UNIT TWELVE. ACC01OM TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDCOOK 20, IN FLAT CO20, PAGE 45 THROMM AL Padu911 rE. OF THE NILIC RECORDS OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLOMM. REV. 1-20-14 ADD COUNTY SMACKS GENERAL SURVEYOR NOTES: 1. Thetagd OewlpbM wdb perronn mesurveywaswppsedhy others Tna samey does m[M: nnirralmpp ms unhip 2 Thya ts•dllbsdnaarsulMlo+enlvas(wrno above geeuled Undergnunesomrtgs. useegs and erusoaclarwrsy are not bul d-let WrW/Mfk i Ctherehas ptlr to ka v4a hale sh wna[hssurvry,the llanen it eelmrteuehe lo[x an was eehMthOwn to eaw-y a mkdpaaya R easesnnuted!y meulde rah, plpatq loll andvyedabae yarrnd l:npectbnorly. Ha otaeanon ws pMwmedmtederto Mwmirw [heextendemrrm lontlolx 4. Tlnh aaryyhwdlwwaytadw use oftM paakn to whon•nhcenMed 5. Additbnsa deleeaytDftmwy map and repot by 01Aw Vh thkssgwrg perry Or seven 4 proNblwd«tbem WMM[oreenrdtneslprseq Fwtya(waMS t OwnelesensM raised aid dadaahmeed 7. DuebvayngMnRluaienwwlderd/. have dar14rrnOM Me apprewmerA. C. AWEMAflM4Mhedtaaa "n+dMmksumfykMr Mfamgbad pml+a'Irs nreT. Rexlareh io ehaln sufidau waspMcrmla MrMww.remagtw. 9. ANd0rinerswWhdMat Malamkumum a»tlMmsa, la•ralrabM avhawp vamped LM 7337 10 Cyoe are ending My svrwYle an d atone formal the Adam esh, ceuwned deMsh docomear b 6*vadd Kmb 0etenn[IR h dectrwtKa�r dglsed as Rwruw n t ChaM 5l•17A62 Oldthe tbdda ACmmaORhe Code "Flomk Stearns 472G25, The C4Man[ A9rwlwe Rk rebad bdlyd0[Hriwra la pbrmmRRly dnp4yed on tlw a`aslCe /a sMt wrvy wNLh b >em wader separate cover. NaneaR/ Mgned and t4akd I°9a d aA wmfy Fgnwure Nes an kept b IBA oma dthe pMamNg wwya.. V%hh dMV-*m k In plan hem-L i ars rotvalldurst-A 6e09-.arrd a4geW rayed ssM da Fkwih Learned Surveil[ 11. Unkas dlrerease nate4 an wamrn+twn same nherap dtgkws pOi perfamed M the Mgmng surveyor Ia dalwmine wild asvmmerte d wry, +ie.Rrchng IMs VapcaY. 11 The grhbak Iel pdwthe"and•ndeh thb survey may have been eterged a red-d!fix deary The symbok Mvebeen planed w the tiad-kheRdd ? lornron. and mpY rot Npraert Me gaud Ifdot a sardthehxule. I 1 i Hoarta d Intmw (P0T9 ere sdMed abawyround Imprrwenwws wAkh may barn car4ec: with bwnary. Wedarq awW cker aswnlm knee, i a, derined by the peraoetersdtAk surrey. Than May be addcbnd POfs With s e nat shown, na cae+baot as P014. at whkh see alh- 1 1M1knfTH1 t011w Wraey0r.T11wt POF! Iny rtOt fepNaerg N nmtd IRerest b IBA vtM9l I 1A USRReM shown Mthe Iublett poperty may a my not irrdgwethe eayterre oT wcolded a unamrtkd utNTyeaenwnC 15. The ademms6n camamedM tlas wrveY hM beenpMamad etrluswaly,ewdkthe xa4 rnpensihNy, dEaam Srrveyera Addannnal lags o*MeMrrcw bthlM prr ban cefc• j' tnlalr 000MM Pwpasa anly. M 16. Pursuant W FS 5-%A035. snvxWeh d ampbyw a agM my rot M hdd iMvMuaywbleta nNlgrrva 1T Noose meaweanswlts allauknot bI weds new tasraweuM d fA+nning MeatwensMu drauW be vemlM Irla ro such atnwty LEGEND _- - 5URR,VEYOF,5 LEGEND {agnlOeras�ww•w ar, MmrOrOwi w. FRtaa1pD10M 91M M.mpM ® yA Rlba EadQ at e!R®[ M. MMsA t aC. a1pGtN' RICE star. sMMealt SM. FI.hOt r. O�agRr10M1�TLLOR err. 1 No 7MQ1x0IC 11A.eM eQ Ma Me+CAI OdY, eNMIF rM U01011 .aelah sloe sMwa/6at CMRIYRweR10C er eewoAvw lfa LCyKe.alehM'R sm.. saw== Mu. ■RPf rgTgGlW lee: M Igadlla@ 7m. a10M ODOR aaaa. aralaR - ase, 5.1.6 swumNg _ eORb�t10a ___-. fer, aeaaee4Xa' M" �Oea07aa as, saadlwME ID 0.0M Wt ague rMR sar MpawR ill laQ C MS MA sua MadMt sw. See - a t CI{m C30nt W.lb4 Has W apYt nM SCMOerl, goo MN OIBAIYOIO C►. CaaRTT Suer, 04.0, MCOMOR.' IMAM R 1e11lolg lacaLress owe. Dreaee oa. 0a0wo TA& SvdrM ReMavadv ter. am uW MMM or aRaceereuelsrnvtA - t0aaewl awLrxrsatlrawls Gd awrda ew pswww >r +aarerogal Om atlem L as "Mar was M. to uI voile dal tees OR uRCOM tabMOCar wtNMLT C11w eFllbrat MlaMaK ORMIL M et dROpRIMMV011 we aonrxpls. DAY G1rA Com aweraurta 09 OVOWLRedO®raY! M e«0=11t1 G CWIMI at wl err. MCOOt RlIQ sa s14rrKE Twgs+rw/ww.swwaf O Los�loean ae has err a«mhgreaatVl eor a7 MQ Q O daewrr sue A Md av uam{w\K O 0® IA I11wMQ VA Nal rOl2 r--I�s�q CJgR10l.�J aatA I._J nM aw0«n 1. raw MCW�aaoaaa*rr a9api M0.V Mv. nAunst P.Qr Meander 0atlp rUlr' •GT:C M•wsN• l_: a0. meal he tan mwNep r.:xs. w*eMan $1.40013"pose ,rare M. Mew,= Mi past v11 VaeLVV: L4vr�:Y e reason- d aRmX- rl raw ehmearsrda UL (l'.Mr-nlm L•e•' E CerI[Rag Mr. meeer rarlsep rt9 npeemarauM ]nAKiel u 1 V7a,•LL tkKfuOn dpraAaeet Oa6Ta LAW. m6[MewtOt R\ fWarC[ L�xnt PawK<aK•11hm G✓. A iM tAe Lffahv Iy.a eoedaaOaaMa nesuem I/! C[aar0a0saeeie, ill rap ID.0 t0aavaaanmwrt dW-Mlose Marr, wC. cellogrL Mpraaeat F.P. f110mM <f rl r-f aeY CaIOZg MGMaewr fla" toarvow osL IAG mw!Paa»tGgVatwt wA! r: TAKt75e^Y GTCr Rrdta rr. radM01100R IAY, pMMYdf a7�1!L taaeACl: tn[ tW7FM aL'n•teltv'. h, IdlMrrlTelR per rRDmom ala,LwA Mar. ftf ty raNCSJVt me Meer M pft+be all' MMp1 t. t V•rt {,a. I.q!n'irL O rvt wgeaM rw acnam apllbp I.T. 'Wel MOK. 4vrhVK:rM1•Nt1i- IseatsMa cas aaAd OR RpD+er1 a 10000 erantra anvnle ORaeCoot tOt I"40 raMasra+pOC hhaa, �uf I.ekr v!a •: o aMwot as roan eat ne .n rr.�n. :ern snena-la•JTeln' ® /IE nMa rOlaw ralbiaARg4lnalx MM woaMrwY ]w4 warrcoM use rate 'eaeo IaM. M.a7s 4 Rlw.[r a SrrT -7. rflt Rhal MR101,00aw J" se1M4Wt qX Ow ... taseleeaCOlagwg Oa 40Il12r. sat s01®I or meF.fLLVMrM: ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE PRINTING INSTRUCTIONS: OFFER VAUD ONLY FOR Don strumilio w [aaoate scarsMal avrrn +aroa SwiNlI7LD]S w punaMl w I W" vwwiag the --y w AdOba Reade, aaroat der IBA bhttlank Sgwww Kr w 19a6p `law. Seaww III u Llaa 'Rani bs4ron under the •fga• tab CMptw 666 a tM eacunwnt ern reteaM Nwrwnrily w IR. re.aenw 0aen tandh•eMn«nWPSymd Iae.elMe.fah ernes rOF.raw•e•:.,a.vldwskeRr:alak«wnbh Yrwbwvsdwe ' 2. Sawcte pnnwwaA l.pd tiaad paper T - - - - - - - - - - - -1 1 metMcvarc sgnswrYa HA w•sewwrew ... -. 3. Undar•Pnnt Rerga'. dkkadtt the-M- toggia. I ewreawe! +MM[wu4bi.AINMMeAkueLa aswlaeMw 4. under der^Papa Handev,-tier. NkCs tlr number M ww+bwMaM IBA[HRegnK a0 San'wa syro�•. ar w,yerawr .wwa+rewas.er.. t e1 cep. ereyeu-ye. Nw b f m. S. lAe4r 0r `PagaSokng•rkceon 6qs dorm m.me, I IS .amWMaWrbet �.. aeket•hlaw.• Q/O OI ff Serenrr5ar•lrro w.a,aw<o«paa. a.«r.««,.nnwa[..< 6. Undleek tha'AMa Ra+taand e.«we 10-16wt fua To15Col ««bemra w�<r«m wrrw.n+r•era+www iGu<aw..oa.w rr Papafa>by PDF•-`- •�_. 7. Chwk tlr •CJee ( b--evnra�«we woe•q-sane w•erarr Iuf+Ci xboron^slydatadrs>ad• yro-xtwe rd en C CkhOKbpnrt I". ANY FUTURE I 1. TOPPMTNAAGC+VMM SURVEYING SERVICES I.. ( cLano trhmra«tMw.w,glerwem«MaatlywFJtuwY s.tamn«aoeuegll mrewmMatrrtnre srw-1 Menweaege I. •Prapardae•. ON THIS PROPERTY M od`aallhr ...wrha 6eE «w.aar.tTwMa.w•..<h a+aa ar +a pnrM agMe beer tWNY S rmeeoenNaAvwsrw•t du.cwraaeooaYdt,Migonaas.oet ( , In der ma:t prmL aaraan. dwoaa ( 2 Cho,.. •Qrr:y'irem th. opeiww. I I I,.,N:..+yMa•..«„+.y..a.+.w+nrt.ya.nwH.rhrat,lr.. ean«kvD haunnwV nrMbey awoaltM«.wneanneta,aan i. 3. Charrge Aom 'Awo Cdora•F�p Cdo.'eo 1 I 1 wKnr', t•n!r il*n "JJ� net Me* 4mneTC ww. ertl n it ner+xtMnr< I ^Gray S.I. r - - - - - - - - - - - r I Exacta Land Surveyors, Inc. r „,ey,�araad,Tdn i 0866-735'.915•R866.744-2002 JW 7337 11940 Fairway takes Dnw- Suke ,• Ft. Myers. FL 33913 i • • • • �dM�o,-� r, PREPARED FOR: MR. 6 MRS. STRUMILLO 6950 WAY �� i ,r.oseare ��e Hii �e.u�■ NORTH 7F NAPLES, COWER COUNTY, FLORIDA SCREEN ENCLOSURE EXMBIT T is. a NFINITE RENOVATION'' Collier County Government 2800 N. Horseshoe Drive Naples FL, 34104 Planning Number: PL20150000006 Site Address: 6950 Verde Way, Naples, FL 34108 To Whom It May Concern: VA — PL20150000006 6950 VERDE WAY DATE: 2/20/15 DUE: 3/6/15 Rev 1 The Strumillos (via the Victoria Lynn Strumillo Trust) purchased the subject home at 6950 Verde Way in 2014. A pool, fence, and pool deck already existed on the property, having been there since 1997 when the home was built. We are proposing to erect a screened pool enclosure and colonnade (as is required by the Pointe Verde Homeowner's Association when erecting a pool enclosure) around the pool and pool deck in order to create a safe and enjoyable outdoor living space. Portions of the current existing pool deck and fence sit within the setback for a pool enclosure, and as the screen enclosure will sit approximately atop the existing pool deck and fence, we are requesting the variance be granted. The screen enclosure will require a reduction of the front setback from 30' to 24', and the side setback to be reduced from 10' to 2'. There is no encroachment on the rear setback. All of the neighboring property owners are in favor of the variance being granted as it allows the reconstruction to continue and bring the property value of the residence in line with adjacent properties, thereby benefitting the entire neighborhood. All 13 residents of Pointe Verde have provided written statements in support of this variance request, and these letters are attached for reference. Additionally, the President of the Pointe Verde Homeowners Association (an immediately adjacent neighbor), the General Manager of the Club Pelican Bay, and the Chairman of the Club Pelican Bay Board of Governors (who happens to be the neighbor directly across the fairway from the subject property, with a direct sight line to it) have also submitted their written approval of the variance request. The Pelican Bay Foundation has also formally, officially, and publically approved this variance in accordance with the Pelican Bay Covenants and Declarations. Additionally, attached are the site property location map, aerial photos and design drawings to further illustrate the location of the proposed screen enclosure and colonnade on the property. These images help illustrate the need for the screen enclosure and its relationship to the neighboring properties. We respectfully request that this variance be approved by Collier County. Thank you in advance, Christopher J. Kalina Infinite Renovations LLC. President & Director of Operations • • 0 0 • Date: January 7, 2015 To: Whom it may concern at the Collier County permitting office Dear Sir, I am the General Manager of The Club Pelican Bay. I am writing in reference to a request for a setback variance by Donald and Victoria Strumillo, owners of 6950 Verde Way in Pelican Bay. Their home and property sit immediately adjacent to our golf course, and the setback variance they are requesting directly impacts our property as the setback sits adjacent to our property. We are aware that 100% of the owners of the Pointe Verde neighborhood have given their approval for this request, and that the Pelican Bay Foundation has also formally granted this request on Instrument "5019376 OR 5067 PG 3247" as recorded in Collier County. This is to inform you that the Management and Board of Governors, have no objection to the requested setback variance requested by the Strumiilo's. Respectfully submitted, rank anew Chairman, Board of Governors — David Mangan General Manager of The Club Pelican Bay 707 GutF PARK DiuvR - NAPLES, FLoxiDn 34108 - (239) 597-1183 - (239) 597-7091 Fax - www,thecltibpelicanba}.com -,/// 6 / � J � f rr� • • Jon D. Wright 6947 Verde Way Naples, FL 34108 (( April 17, 2014 f Mr. Frank Laney ( Pelican Bay Director of Facilities 6851 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naples, FL 34108 E Dear Mr. Laney, f. I am writing this letter as both President of the Pointe Verde Homeowners Association and as ( an immediate neighbor of the residence located at 6950 Verde Way which was purchased earlier this month by Don and Vickie Strumillo. The Strumillos currently own and reside in another Pelican Bay property and have made the recent purchase because of their desire to ` remain in Pelican Bay and to be located on the golf course with a larger residence. The i property they recently purchased, at 6950 Verde Way, has only been occupied for a few ( months each year and is in need of a real "face lift." The residents on Verde Way are very pleased to have the Strumillos as neighbors and even more pleased to hear that 6950'will be undergoing significant improvements. Don Strumillo conducted a meeting with his neighbors earlier this week to describe the intended exterior improvements around the existing swimming pool area on the East side of the property which faces directly onto the fairway of the Bay Course second hole. The swimming pool and surrounding patio areas and completely exposed and receive regular debris falling from the line of oak trees which separate their property from the golf course fairway. They would like to extend a room on the rear of the house and enclose the entire pool and patio area with a screen enclosure. The concept was described to Scott McCuaig, the immediate neighbor on the north side, and to me and we are in full support of the planned improvements. Concept drawings are currently being prepared and should be in your hands promptly. I am requesting that you work with the Strumillos to secure the appropriate approvals enabling them to make the dramatic improvements so urgently needed. If I can be of assistance to facilitate the process, please let me know. I am a full time resident and available throughout the summer months. Thank you for your consideration of this request. 0 Jon D. Wright POINT'E VERDE ASSOCIATION OWNERS ROSTER AS OF APRIL 20, 2014 RESIDENCE NAME N.4PLES ADDRESSS 1 ?ALTERNATE ADDRESS/ PHONE NO. PHONE NO, 6947 Wright 6947 Verde Way Jon & Sallie Naples, FL 34108 _. (239)431-5764 6950 STRUMILLO Don & Vicky ?J 6951 Knapp/Nikrant Barbara & James 6954 McCuaig Scott & Diane 6950 Verde Way 6003 S. Grant St. Maples, FL 34108 Burr Ridge, IL. 60527 (630) 640-6 700 Don (630-267-7000 Vick--y 6951 Verde Way 307 Crescent St. SE Naples, FL 34108 Cedar Rapids, IA 52403 (239) 653 -9676 (319)366-4908 6954 Verde Way N 30 W 29435 Hill Crest Dr. Naples, FL 34108 Pewaukee, W153072 (239) 596-6583 (314)308-5599 Diane cell 314-602-2747 Scott cell 341-3WS599 6955 Weardon 6955 Verde Way Todd & Kristen Naples, FL 34108 - • (239) 594- 3128 —- 6958 Montgomery 6958 Verde Way Charles & Mary Lee Maples, FL 34108 (239)514-1467 • k POINTE 'VERDE ASSOCIATION RESIDENcE NAME MAPLES ADORM A LTEKNAf E ADIDpXW Pffo**E tip. PHONE No. 6959 Phillips 6959 Verde WAY P. 0. Box 430 George & Juliana NaPles, FL 34108 Mirror Laki, NH 03853 (239) 592 - o990 (603)569-2514 6962 Peterson 6962 Verde Way 3064 Rmd-lac Road Donald & Maureen Naples, FL 34108 Annapolis, MD 21403 (908)337-1894 6963 Lindhowe 6963 Verde Way Rick & Cheryl P. 0, Box 82 Naples, FL 34109 Cuba, Ny 14727 (239) 631-2675 0116) 474-7483/ 474-63.50 6966 Hess 6966 Verde Way To & Hanna Naples, FL 34108 (239) -594-1096 6%7 Fiterman 6967 Verde Way Steven & Susan 7575 Golden Valley Rd. #30 Naples, FL 34108 Golden Valley, MN 55427 (239) 514 0250 763-529-7701 Cel"12.207-8830 - 6971 Whitwara 6971 Verde Way David & Barbara L. N&P105, FL 34108 1408 Manley Court Saint Joseph, MI 49085 (239) 592 -"75 269-982-0951 6975 Northap 6975 Verde Way Woody & Ann Naples, FL 34108 3340 Lexifttoxi Road (239) %6-1682 LOuisvIlle, KY40206 502-5"4179 Jon D. Wright 6947 Verde Way Naples, FL 34108 Mr. Frank Laney Pelican Bay Director of Facilities 6851 Pelican Bay Blvd. Naples, FL 34108 Dear Mr. Laney, C ORi�fM�d• C�7iF%I Or LPPoPT April 17, 2014 I am writing this letter as both President of the Pointe Verde Homeowners Association and as an immediate neighbor of the residence located at 69150 Verde Way which was purchased earlier this month by Don and Vickie Strumillo. The Strumillos currently own and reside in another Pelican Bay property and have made the recent purchase because of their desire to remain in Pelican Say and to be located on the golf course with a larger residence. The property they recently purchased, at 6950 Verde Way, has only been occupied for a few months each year and is in need of a real "face lift." The residents on Verde Way are very pleased to have the Strumillos as neighbors and even more pleased to hear that 6950 will be undergoing significant improvements. Don Strumillo conducted a meeting with his neighbors earlier this week to describe the intended exterior improvements around the existing swimming pool area on the East side of the property which faces directly onto the fairway of the Bay Course second hole. The swimming pool and surrounding patio areas and completely exposed and receive regular debris falling from the line of oak trees which separate their property from the golf course fairway. They would like to extend a room on the rear of the house and enclose the entire pool and patio area with a screen enclosure. The concept was described to Scott McCuaig, the immediate neighbor on the north side, and to me and we are in full support of the planned Improvements. Concept drawings are currently being prepared and should be in your hands promptly. I am requesting that you work with the Strumillos to secure the appropriate approvals enabling them to make the dramatic improvements so urgently needed. If I can be of assistance to facilitate the process, please let me know. I am a full time resident and available throughout the summer months. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Jon D. Wright 0 • 0 t �,- 5►9V7aZ� Re: Fldrfe Verde requesitomJat VVr#g ht C • From: Jim Nikrant <jnikrant@gmaii.com> To; jdwgsi <jdwgsi@aa[.com> 3 Cc: kweardon <kweardon@aol.com>; verdeway <verdeway@com cast neh; geophillips <geophiifips@roadrunner.com>; donaidkpeterson <donatdkpeteMon@gmaii.wm>; riddindhome i <ricidindhome@yahoo.com>; thess2e <thass2e@aol.com>; sfiterman <sfiterrnan@mac.eom>; david <david@davidwhitwam.com>; woodyn <woodyn&adiosound.com>; soottbmcouaig (, <swithrnccuaig@gmail.com>; don <don@amsdirect.com> Subject: Re; Points Verde requestfrom Jon Wright j Rate: Fri, May 9, 2014 5;45 pm 100 percent in favor..... Will be an improvement aim ( Sent from my iPhone i > On May 9, 2014, at 10:25 AM, "-� __ - < > wrote: ( > t > I am writing this e-mail to ask for the support of Pointe Verde homeowners for a set back variance request for the rear of the property located at 6950 Verde Way. The property involved is adjacent to my property and was recently ( purchased by Don and Vicky Strumillo from Gerald Uht. The Strumillos are panning major interior and exterior renovations to the residence including t landscape improvements while will beref_z, all of our property values. d > > The Strumillos would like to erect a screened pool enclosure on the ( approximate footprint of their existing deck at the rear of the property. ironically, the existing deck extends into the setback area and has been there since the property was built in. 1996. The adjoining property at the rear of the house is the golf course fairway which is bordered by a line of trees. Logic would indicate that this should be a "non -issue" and that the position of the deck should be "grandfathered" having been there for eighteen years! The desire F- to erect a screened pool enclosure however has breathed "new life" into the set �. back issue. r > t > > Scott McCuaig, Strumillos neighbor on the North side, and I recently met Jon on site and reviewed the planned improvements. We are both supportive of the plans. and actually wrote letters indicating our approval. have since been ' directed to secure broad support from Pointe Verde residents favoring this variance. > > Attached is an aerial view of the property and a schematic of the existing deck and the outline of the requested screen. addition. Note that the deck has a jagged edge on the golf course side that aesthetically and practically needs to be straightened out to allow.for the screen's stable erection. > > several variances have been approved in our subdivision since its inception, and our covenants also include the following clause intended for the benefit of its members. > > > "Article Xr1, General Provisions, Section 12.9 construction: The provisions of the Neighborhood Declaration shall be liberally interpreted and construed to provide maximum flexibility consistent with the Aeclarant's general plan for development of Pelican Bay and the :eighborhood and the proposed set forth ht�•Ihrra�►.aol.cart>56�1111aot-Fi+etF-uslmailiPritdMMessal0o.aswt 112 Re: Pointe Verde request from Jon Wright From: ScottMccuaig <scothmccuaig@gmail.com> • To: jdwgs i <jdwgsi@aol.com> Subject: Re: Pointe Verde request from Jon Wright Date: Fri, May 9, 2014 12:58 pm I have no Problem. Sent from my iPhone On May 9, 2014, at 10:25 AM, wrote: I am writing this e-mail to ask for the support of Pointe Verde homeowners for a set back variance request for the rear of the property located at 5950 Verde Way. The property involved is adjacent to my property and was recently purchased by Dort and Vicky Strumillo from Gerald Uht. The Strumillos are planning major interior and exterior renovations to the residence including landscape improvements while will benefit all of our property values. The Strumillos would like to erect a screened pool enclosure on the approximate footprint of their existing deck at the rear of the property. Ironically, the existing deck extends into the setback area and has been there since the property was built in 1996. The adjoining property at the rear of the house is the golf course fairway which is bordered by a line of trees. Logic would indicate that this should be a "non -issue" and that the position of the deck should be "grandfathered" having been there for eighteen years! The desire to erect a screened pool enclosure however has breathed "new life" into the set back • issue. Scott McCuaig, Strumillos neighbor on the North side. and I recently met Don on site and reviewed the planned improvements. We are both supportive of the plans and actually wrote letters indicating our approval. I have since been directed to secure broad support from Pointe Verde residents favoring this variance. Attached is an aerial view of the property and a schematic of the existing deck and the outline of the requested screen addition. Note that the deck has a jagged edge on the golf course side that aesthetically and practically needs to be straightened out to allow for the screen's stable erection. Several variances have been approved in our subdivision since its inception, and our covenants also include the following clause intended for the benefit of its members. "Article Al, General Provisions, Section 12.9 Construction: The Orovisions of the Neighborhood Declaration shall be liberally interpreted and construed to provide maximum flexibility consistent with the Declarants general plan for development of Pelican Bay and the Neighborhood and the proposed set forth herein, including the preamble." K should be noted that once the pool cage ha been constructed, it will not be visible to the majority of neighbors and only partially visible to me. The Strumillos intend the construction of the pod enclosure to be in compliance with our covenants including "having the main structural elements of the enclosure being of material other than aluminum framing that is compatible vMth the dwelling unit (i.e.stuceo covered concrete block with a stucco residence) Article V, Section 5.3" Please send me your e-mail approval for the variance promptly so the Strumillos can get construction plans underway. I will compile all the responses and deliver them to the Pelican Bay Foundation office. I would like to be able to do this early next week. My e-mail address is idwosiQaol,com. Thank you for your attention to this request, Jon Wright, HOA President f - V 0 l2 ! & f*,+k ,Cr T72.2 j. C. voo .4opear i�4 -�f't.s�', ►''o`er 7 ♦ R grg=4 Re: Pointe Verderequest twrl Jon Wright From; Kweardon@aol.com <kweardon@aol.com> • To: jdwgsi <jdwgsi@aol.com> Cc: jnikrant <jnikrant@gmail.com>; verdeway <verdeway@comcastnet>; geophillips <geophillips @road ru nner.com >; donaldkpeterson <donaldkpeterson@gmail.corn>: ricklindhome <ricklindhome&ehoo.00m7; thess2e <thess2e@aol.com>; sfiterman <sfiterman@mac.00m>; david <david@davidwhitwam.com>: woodyn <woodyn@radiosound.com>; scottbmecuaig <scottbmccuaig@gmail.com>; don <don@amsdirectcom> Subject: Re: Pointe Verde requestfrom Jon Wright oats: Fri, May 9, 2014 3:12 pm This alteration is ok with us and we believe it to be an excellent improvement to the property and add value to our neighborhood Todd W eardon Kristen Weardon Sent from my iPhone On May 9, 2014, at 11:25 AM, jdwgsi(cDaol.corn wrote; I am writing this e-mail to ask for the support of Pointe Verde homeowners for a set back variance request for the rear of the property located at 6950 Verde Way. The property involved is adjacent to my property and was recently purchased by Don and Vicky Strumillo from Gerald Uht. The Strumillos are planning major interior and exterior renovations to the residence including landscape improvements while will benefit all of our property slues. Site Strumillos would like to erect a screened pool enclosure on the approximate footprint of their existing deck at the near of the property. Ironically, the existing deck extends into the setback area and has been there since the property was built in 1996, The adjoining property at the rear of the house is the golf course fairway which is bordered by a line of trees. Logic would indicate that this should be a "non -issue" and that the position of the deck should be "grandfathered" having been there for eighteen years! The desire to erect a screened pool enclosure however has breathed "new life" into the set back issue. Scott McCuaig, Strumillos neighbor on the North side, and I recently met Don on site and reviewed the planned improvements. We are both supportive of the plans and actually wrote letters indicating our approval. I have since been directed to secure broad support from Pointe Verde residents favoring this variance. Attached is an aerial V+ew of the property and a schematic of the existing deck and the outline of the requested screen addition. Note that the deck has a jagged edge on the golf course side that aesthetically and practically needs to be straightened out to allow for the screen's stable erection. Several variances have been approved in our subdivision since its inception, and our covenants also include the following clause intended for the benefit of its members. 'Article )CII, General Provisions, Section 12.9 Construction; The provisions of the Neighborhood Declaration shall be liberally interpreted and construed to provide maximum flexibility consistent with the Declarants general plan for development of Pelican Bay and the Neighborhood and the proposed set forth herein, including the preamble." it should be noted that once the pool cage ha been constructed, it will not be visible to the majority of . neighbors and only partially visible to me. The Strumillos intend the construction of the pool enclosure to be in compliance with our covenants including "having the main structural elements of the enclosure being of material other than aluminum framing that is compatible with the dwelling unit (i.e.stucco covered concrete block with a stucco residence) Article V, Section 5.3" M oIrreil.al=448656111essa9e.aspx ,n NW4 Re: Pointe Verde request from Jon Wright • Orp From: verdeway rverdeway@eomcast.neh To: jdwgsi <jdw9s1*ao1.wm> Subject: Re: Pointe Verde request from Jon Wright l Date: Fri, May9, 20141227 pm Jon. We approve it. in fact we have a screen over our North privacy garden which goes 5 ft beyond the easement. ( Mary tee Montgomery ( --- Original Message -- From: 10.yW. iftol.com To: jnikrantftmail.com, kweardonO.Aol.comwrdeway0comeast.nat. aeoohiiiig_sOroadrunner.comt, (' donaldk erson@gmail.com, ecklipdho-m-gayahoo.com. _thess2 aoi.com, sfitermanQmac.com, davidQ-dMddwh-ltwam,com, woodyn(aradigsound.cam Cc: soottbmocuaig(5gmail.com, doniZamsdlrect.com ( Sent: Fri, 09 May 201415:25:39 4= (UTC) ( Subject: Pointe Verde request from Jon Wright I am writing this e-mail to ask for the support of Pointe Verde homeowners for a set back variance request for the near of the property located at 6950 Verde Way. The property involved Is adjacent to my property and alas recently f purchased by icon and Vicky Strumillo from Gerald Uht. The Strumillos are planning major interior and exterior renovations to the residence including landscape improvements while will benefit all of our property values. ( The Strumillos would like to erect a screened pool enclosure on the approximate footprint of their existing deck at the E rear of the property. Ironically, the existing deck extends into the setback area and has been there since the properly was built in 1996. lice adjoining property at the rear of the house is the golf course fairway which is bordered by a i line of trees, Logic would indicate that this should be a "non -issue" and that the position of the deck should be "grandfathered° having been there for eighteen years! The desire to erect a screened pool enclosure however has breathed "new life" into the set back issue. t. Scott McCuaig, Strumillos neighbor on the North side, and I recently met Don on site and reviewed the planned I improvements. We are both supportive of the plans and.actually wrote letters indicating our approval. I have since been directed to secure broad support from Pointe Verde residents favoring this variance. ( Attached is an aerial view of the property and a schematic of the existing deck and the outline of the requested ( screen addition. Note that the deck has a jagged edge on the golf course side that aesthetically and practically needs to be straightened out to allow for the screen's stable erection. Several variances have been approved in our subdivision since its inception, and our covenants also include the following clause intended for the bonefrt of its members. "Article )(11, General Provisions, Section 12.9 Construction: The provisions of the Neighborhood Declaration shall be liberally interpreted and construed to provide maximum flexibility consistent with the Declarant's general plan for development of Pelican Say and the Neighborhood and the proposed set forth herein, inciting the preamble." it should be noted that once the pool cage ha been constructed, it will not be visible to the majority of neighbors and only partially visible to me. The Strumillos intend the construction of the pool enclosure to be in compliance with our covenants including "having the main structural elements of the enclosure being of material other than aluminum framing that is compatible with the dwelling unit (i.e.stucco covered concrete block with a stucco residence) Article V, Section 5.3" Please send me your e-mail approval for the variance promptly so the Strumillos can get construction plans underway. I will compile all the responses and deliver them to the Pelican Bay Foundation ofAce. i would like to be able to do this early next week, My e-mail address is jdwgsiftoi.com. Thank you for your attention to this request, Jon Wright, NQA President • tdlp'lhrrail.ad�11i1ad-6JOn-u4fi'�eif/Prir�hAesaeaA �arnr 51912014 Re: Pdnte Verde request from Jon Wright From: geophillips <geophillips@roadrun ner.com> /L'� • 707 To: jdwgsi<jdwgsi@aol.com> Subject: Re: Pointe Verde request from Jon Wright Date: Fri, Nay 9, 2014 6:01 pm Ok with the Phillipses! Sent from my iPhone On May 9, 2014, at 11:25 AM, idwasi(&aol.crm wrote: ! am writing this e-mail to ask for the support of Pointe Verde homeowner for a set back variance request for the rear of the property located at 6950 Verde Way. The property involved is adjacent to my property and was recently purchased by Don and Vicky Strumillo from Gerald Uht. The Sttvmil!os are planning major interior and exterior renovations to the residence including landscape improvements while will benefit all of our property values. The Strumillos would like to erect a screened pool enclosure on the approximate footprint of their existing deck at the rear of the property. Ironically, the existing deck extends into the setback area and has been there since the property was built in 1996. The adjoining property at the rear of the house is the golf course fairway which is bordered by a line of trees. Logic would indicate that this should be a "non -issue" and that the position of, the deck should be "grandfathered" hawing been there for eighteen years! The desire to erect a screened pool enclosure however has breathed "new life" into the set back issue. . Scott McCuaig, Strumillos neighbor on the North side, and I recently met Don on site and reviewed the planned improvements. We are both supportive of the plans and actually wrote letters indicating our approval. I have since been directed to secure broad support from Pointe Verde residents favoring this variance. Attached is an aerial view of the property and a schematic of the existing deck and the outline of the requested screen addition. Note that the deck has a jagged edge on the golf course side that aesthetically and practically needs to be straightened out to allow for the screen's stable erection. Several variances have been approved in our subdivision since its inception, and our covenants also include the following clause intended for the benefit of its members. "Article )(11, General Provisions, Section 12.9 Construction: The provisions of the Neighborhood Declaration shall be liberally interpreted and construed to provide maximum flexibility consistent with the Declarant's general plan for deveiopment of Pelican Bay and the Neighborhood and the proposed set forth herein, including the preamble." It should be noted that once the pool cage ha been constructed, it will not be visible to the majority of neighbors and only partially visible to me. The Strumillos intend the construction of the pool enclosure to be in compliance with our covenants including "having the main structural elements of the enclosure being of material other than aluminum framing that is compatible with the dwelling unit (I.e.stucco covered concrete block with a stucco residence) Article V, Section 5.3" Please send me your a -•nail approval for the variance promptly so the Strumillos can get construction plans underway. I will compile all the responses and deliver them to the Pelican Bay Foundation office. 1 would like to be able to do this early next week. My e-mail address is idwh msidaaot.com. Thank you for your attention to this request, Jon Wright, HOA President N10Yhrg8.aol.Comrs855rr 111/aol-6/err-us/mail?Prin:tdessag e.aspy . ----• Re: PdrKe Verde request SrOrJW VVri911 ,a 5(9r2014 !L. From: Don eadonaldkpeterson@gmail .cam> To: jdwgsi I-}dwgsi@aol,com> Subject: Re: Pointe Verde request from Jon Wright Date: Fri, May 9, 20141 t:59 am -.- !'m ok with this proposal. Don Peterson ` Sent from my !Phone { On May 9, 2014, at 11:25 AM, idwpsir1aoi.com wrote: ( Support of Pointe Verde homeowners for a sett back variance t, { am writing this e-mail to ask for the request ibr the rear of the property located at 6950 Verde Way. Tt* property involved is adjacent to my ( property and was recently purchased by Don and Vicky Strumi{lo from Gerald Uht. The Strumillos are planning major interior and exterior renovations to the residence including landscape improvements while will benefit all of our property +dues. The Strumilios would like to erect a screened pool enclosure on the approximate footprint of their existing deck at the rear of the property. Ironically, the existing duck extends into the setback area and ( has been there since the property was built in 1995. The adjoining property at the rear of the house Is ( the golf course fairway which is bordered by a line of trees. Logic would indicate thatthere should be a "non-lssus" and that the position of the deck should be "grandfathered" having been for eighteen (� yearsi The desire to erect a screened pool enclosure hovvevar has breathed "new life" into the set back issue. Scott McCuaig, Strumillos .neighbor on the North side, and I recently met Don on site and rev9ewed the planned imI have since been directed tots. We am both secure broad sive of the upport from Pointe ns and actually Verde rete sidentsrs rcating our fawning this approval. i_ variance. Attached is an aerial view of the property and a schematic of the existing deck and the outline of the requested screen addition. Note that the deck has a jagged edge on the golf course side that aesthetically and practically needs to be straightened out to allow for the screen's stable erection. Several variances have been approved in our subdivision since its inception, and our covenants also include the following clause intended for the benefit of its members. 'Article kil, General Provisions, Section 12,9 Construction: The provisions of the Neighborhood Declaration shall be liberally interpreted and construed to provide maximum flexibility consistent with the Declarants genera{ plan for development of Pelican Bay and the Neighborhood and the proposed set forth herein, Including the preamble" to the majority of It should be noted that once the pod cage ha been constructed, it wilnot l he pool enclosure neighbors and only partially visible to me. The $trumrBios ►mend the co nstruction of to be in compliance with our covenants including "having the main structural elements of the enclosure being of material other than aluminum framing that is compatible with the dwelling unit (I.s.sttucco covered concrete block \A ttt a stucco residence) Article V, Section 5.3" • please sand me your e-mail approval for the variance promptly so the Strumlllos can get construction plans underway. i will compge all the responses and deliver them to the Pelican Bay Foundation oft. would like to be able to do this early next week. My e-mail address is idwosl aol.cam. Thank you for your attention to this request, Jon Wright, HOA President .._.�..,a�+,.,�.�„�r..�rarw��rP�,�tN►essaoa.aswc ia 5f9fX)IA ., Re: Pdrtte Verde request prom Jon Wig nt From: Rick Undhome <hcOndhome@yahoo.com> . To: jdwgsi <jdwgsi@aol,com>: jnikrant <jnikrant@gntaii.com>; kweardon ekweardon@aol.com>: vardeway G� <v@rdeway@comcast.net>: geophillips <geophillips@roadrunner.com>: donaldkpeterson / <donaldkpeterson@gmail.com>; thess2e <thess2e(dr9ol,com>; sfiterman <sfiterman@mac.com>; david <david@dwAdwhitwam.com>; woodyn <woodyn@radiosound.com> Cc: scottbmecuaig <scottbmccuaig@gmail.com>; don <don@amsdirect.com> Subject: Re: Pointe Verde request from Jon Wright Date: Fri, May9, 2014 1:38 Pm Jor4 ► am fine with the request for a variance. From: "jdwgsi@aol.com" <jdwgsi@aol.com> To: jnikrant@gmail.com; kweardon@aol.com; verdeway@comcast.net; geophillips@roadrunner.com; donaldkpeterson@gmaii.com; ricklindhome@yahoo.com; thess2e@aol.com; sfiterman@mac.com; david@davidwhitwam.com; woodyn@radiosound.com Cc: scottbmccuaig@gmail.com; don@amsdirect.co.n Sent: Friday, May 9, 2014 11:25 AM Subject: Pointe Verde request from Jon Wright i am w7itin9 this e-mail to ask for the support of Pointe Verde homeowners for a set back variance request for the rear • of the property located at 6950 Verde Way. The property involvad is adjacent to my property and was recently purchased by Don and Vicky Strumillo from Gerald Uht. The Strumillos are planning major interior and exterior renovations to the residence including landscape improvements while will benefit all of our property values. The Strumillos would like to erect a screened pool enclosure on the approximate footprint of their existing deck at the rear of the property. ironically, the existing deck extends into the setback area and has been there since the property was built in 1996. The adjoining property at the rear of the house is the golf course fairway which is bordered by a line of trees. Logic would indicate that this should be a "non -issue" and that the position of the deck should be "grandfathered" having been there for eighteen years! The desire to erect a screened pool enclosure however has breathed "new life" into the set back issue. Scott McCuaig, Strumillos neighbor on the North side, and I recently met Don on site and reviewed the planned improvements. We are both supportive of the plans and actually wrote letters indicating our approval. I have since been directed to secure broad support from Pointe Verde residents favoring this variance. Attached is an aerial view of the property and a schematic of the existing deck and the outline of the requested screen addition. Note that the deck has a jagged edge on the golf course side that aesthetically and practically needs to be straightened out to allow for the screen's stable erection. Several variances have been approved in our subdivision since its inception, and our covenants also include the following clause intended for the benefit of its members. "Article )I1, General Provisions, Section 12.9 Construction: The provisions of the Neighborhood Declaration shall be liberally interpreted and construed to provide maximum flexibility consistent with the beclarant's general plan for development of Pelican Bay and the Neighborhood and the proposed set forth herein, including the preamble." is it should be noted that once the pool cage ha been constructed, it will not be visible to the majority of neighbors and only partially visible to me. The Strumillos intend the construction of the pool enclosure to be in compliance with our covenants including "having the main structural elements of the enclosure being of material other than aluminum i4:Nrn II.apt.com3e36fr711/a1-Ston.LWmaUPrintMessz,�e.asnx e. 5$4 Re: poIr to Verde mi uat from Jon wri$ht / From: Tony,4hsss2e@aol.corn> To: jdwgsl 4jdw9s1@aol.com> Subject: Re: Pointe Verde request from Jon Wright Date: Fri, May9, 2014 1:25 pm i Jon, I Hanna and I have no problem with the variance. Tony Hess Sent from my !Pad d t aol. com vine: t,- On May 9, 2t}14, at 11:25 AM, j.�9��@ f t am writing this e-mail to ask for the support of Pointe Verde homeowners for a set back variance request for the rear of the property located at 6950 Verde Way. The property involved is adjacent to my property and was recently purchased by Don and Vicky Strumillo from Gerald Uht. The Strumillos are planning major Interior and exterior renovations to the residence including landscape improvements ( while will benefit all of our property dues. t The Strumillos would like to erect a screened pool enclosure on the approximate footprint of their E existing deck at the rear of the property. ironically, the existing deck extends into the setback area and • has been there since the property was built in 19%. The adjoining property at the rear of the house is the golf course fairway which is bordered by a line of trees. Logic would indicate that this should be a "non -issue" and that the position of the deck should be "grandfathered' having been there for eighteen { years! The desire to erect a screened pool enclosure however has breathed "new life" into the set back issue. Scott McCuaig, Strumillos neighbor on the North side, and I recently met Don on site and reviewed the planned improvements. We are both supportive of the plans and actually wrote letters indicating our approval. I have since been directed to secure broad support from Pointe Verde residents favoring this r variance. t r Attached is an aerlal view of the property and a schematic of the existing deck and the outline of the requested screen addition. Note that the deck has a jagged edge on the golf course side that ` aesthetically and practically needs to be straightened out to allow for the screen's stable erection. Several variances have been approved in our subdivision since its inception, and our covenants also include the following clause intended for the benefit of its members. "Article MI. General Provisions, Section 12.9 Construotion: The provisions of the Neighborhood Declaration shall be liberally interpreted and construed to provide maximum flexibility consistent with the DeciaraWs general plan for development of Pelican Say and the NelghboftW and the proposed set forth h"n, including the preamble." it should be noted that once the pool cage ha been constructed, it will not be visible to the majority of neighbors and only partially visible to me. The Strumfiios intend the construction of the pool enclosure • to be in compliance with our covenarris including "having the main structural elements of the enclosure being of material other than aluminum framing that is compatible with the dwelling unit (Le.stuoco covered concrete block with a stucco residence) Article V, Section 5T Please send me your e-mail approval for the variance promptly so the Strumillos can get construction plans underway. I will compile all the responses and deliver them to the Pelican Say Foundation office. I would like to be able to do this early next week. My e-mail address is iNgsi ool.com. 92 � -- Re: Pointe Verde req oast from Jon kVight From: STEVEN FITERMAN<Sfiterman@grounddevelopment.corrf> :� To: jdwgsi <jdwgsi ceaol.com> t Subject; Re: Pointe Verde request from Jon Wright Date: Fri, May 9. 2014 11:39 am We have no problem with the variance. I'm sure the professionals they're working with will reach out to the golf club. They're the party most effected. Steve & Susie From: <idwgsi aol,com> Date; Friday, May 9, 2014 at 11:25 AM To: <inikrant_Qgmail.com>, <",eardon cl?+aol.cam>, < T eway@comcactnet>, <geophillips(&roadrunner.com>, <dona,dlrneterson@gm:L ..com>, <ricklindhome@vahooxom>, <th,eu2e„@a_,ao1.com>, STEVEN FITERMAN <sfjterman0maaccoin>, <daVid(@da idwhitwam.cnm>, <woodyn(&radiosound.com> Cc: <scottb inccuaig2email.con >, <don0bamsdirect.Cor,,> Subject: Pointe Verde request from Jon Wright I am writing this e-mail to ask for the support of Pointe Verde homeowners for a set back variance request for the rear of the property located at 6950 Verde Way. The property inwlvfed is adjacent to my property and was recently purchased by Don and Vicky Strumillo from Gerald Uht. The Strumillos are planning major Interior and exterior renovations to the residence including landscape improvements while will benefit all of our property values. The Strumillos would like to erect a screened pool enclosure on the approximate footprint of their existing deck at the • rear of the property. Ironically, the existing deck extends into the setback area and has been there since the property was built in 1996. The adjoining property at the rear of the house is the golf course fairway which is bordered by a line of trees. Logic would indicate that this should be a "non -issue" and that the position of the deck should be "grandfathered" having been there for eighteen years! The desire to erect a screened pool enclosure however has breathed "new life" into the set back issue. Scott McCuaig, Strumillos neighbor on the North side, and I recently met Don on site and reviewed the planned improvements. We are both supportive of the plans and actually wrote letters Indicating our approval. I have since been directed to secure broad support from Pointe Verde residents favoring this variance. Attached is an aerial view of the property and a schematic of the existing deck and the outline of the requested screen addition. Note that the deck has a jagged edge on the golf course side that aesthetically and practically needs to be straightened out to allow for the screen's stable erection. Several variances have been approved in our subdivision since its inception, and our covenants also include the follo\Mng clause intended for the benefit of its members. "Article )(II, General Provisions, Section 12.9 Construction: The provisions of the Neighborhood Declaration shall be liberally interpreted and construed to provide maximum flexibility consistent with the Declarant's general plan for development of Pelican Bay and the Neighborhood and the proposed set forth herein, including the preamble." It should be noted that once the pool cage ha been constructed, it will not be visible to the majority of neighbors and only partially visible to me. The Strumillos intend the construction of the pool enclosure to be in compliance with our covenants including "having the main structural elements of the enclosure being of material other than aluminum framing that is compatible with the dwelling unit (i.e.stucco covered concrete block with a stucco residence) Article • V, Section 5.3" Please send me your e-mail approvel for the variance promptly so the Strumillos can get construction plans underway. I will compile all the responses and deliver them to the Pelican Bay Foundation office. I would like to be able to do this early next week. My e-mail address is idwasitdaot.com. htmJlrr�ail.aol.COrr►r3868� 1 S i lad{-6lett-us/maif Jeri MM acsan a acnz 519014 RE. Pointe Verde request from Jori frigty • From: David Whitwam <david@dwAdwhitwam.cbm> To: jdwgsi<idwgsi@aol.com>;jnikrant<jnikrant@gmaii.com>; kweardon <kweardon@aol.com>; verdeway f� <verdeway@comcast.net>; geophittips <geophillips@roadrunner.wni>; donaldkpeterson <donaldkpeterson@gmall.com>; rickUndhome <rickilndhome@yahoo.com>; thess2e <4hess2e@aol.com>; sfiterman <sflterman@maacom>; woodyn <woody Qradiosound com> Cc: scotibmocuaig <scotibmcxuaig@gmail.com>; don <don@amsdirectcom> Subject; RE: Pointe Verde request from ,ton Wright ( Date: Fri, May 9, 201411:51 am Jain I'm also fine with this variance request Dave Whtwam Rorm idwcW@goi.com aoi.com rmaiIto: Jdwgsitla aol.coml f Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 11:26 AM To: jrrila'a=gmail.corn; kweardon@aol.com; verk&,ay-Qcomcastnet =ghiiliosi'a roadrunner.com; donaldimeterson0amail.com; ricklindbgmgQyahoo.com: tiess2e*aoi.com: sfitermanOmac.gom: ( 4vid.Qdayidwhitwam.com; wed mO[adiosound.com Cc. scDMbmccualg*gmail.com,. ,dam a(Zamsdire MM Subject: Pointe Verde request from Son Wright I am writing this e-mail to ask for the support of Pointe Verde homeowners for a set back variance request for the near of the property located at 6950 Verde Way. The property involved is adjacent to my property and was recently purchased by Don and Vicky Strumillo ftm Gerald Uht. Tho Strumillos are planning major interior and oxte for renovations to the residence including landscape improvements while will benefit all of our property dues. The Strumillos would like to erect a screened pool enclosure on the approximate footprint of their existing deck at the rear of the property. Ironically, the existing deck extends into the setback area and has been there since the property was built in 1996. The adjoining property at the rear of the house is the golf course fairway which is bordered by a fine of trees. Logic would indicate that this should be a "non -issue" and that the position of the deck shoed be "grandfathered" having been there for eighteen years! The desire to erect a screened pool enclosure however has breathed "new life" into the set back issue. Scott: McCuaig, Strumillos neighbor on the North side, and I recently met Don on site and reviewed the planned improvements. We are both supportive of the plans and actually wrote letters Indicating = approval. I have since been directed to secure broad support from Pointe Verde residents favoring this variance. Attached is an aerial view of the property and a schematic of the existing deck and the outline of the requested screen addition. Note that the deck has a jagged edge on the golf course side that aesthetically and practically needs to be straightened out to allow for the screen's stable erection. ft.Ifni.aN.0anGBSW y/q RE: Pointe Verse req Jest f anion wright From: WoodyNorthup <WOOOYN@RADIOSOUND.com> . To., jdwgsi <jdwgsi@aol.com>: jnikrant <jnikrant@ii gmal.com>; kweardon <kweardon@aol.com>; verdeway !L/ <verdeway@comcasLnet>; geophiflips <geophillips@roadrunner.com>; donaldkpeterson ?� <donaldkpeterson@gmail.com>; ricklindhome <ricklindhome@yahoo.com>; thess2e <thess2e@aol,com>; sfiterman <sfrterman@mac.com>; david <david@davidwhitwam.00m> Cc: soottbmccuaig <scottbmccuaig@gmail.com>; don <don@amsdirecLcom> Subject: RE: Pointe Verde request from Jon Wright Date: Fri, Wzyg, 2014 11:37 am , ohi,,, i ani Time with this alteration. Woody Northup Frartt~ jdwgsiOaol,com f�mailto:jdwasiCaraoi.coml Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 11:26 AM To: jNkrantCc_>aamail.com; ! weardonCa aol.g.,-,i; verdewavcomcas nit, oeoohillios(Mroadrunner.com;, donaldkpeterson@amail.corn; ricklindhomeca4rhoo,,eom; thes52eCa�aoi.com; sfit rmanCamac.com: david0adavidwhitwam.com; Woody Northup Ah Cc: scottbmccuaio;_omail.corn; doriaamsdirectcom Subject: Pointe Verde request from Jon Wright: l am writing this e-mail to ask for the support of Pointe Verde homeowners for a set back variance request for the rear of the property located at 6950 Verde Way. The property involved is adjacent to my property and was recently purchased by Don and Vicky Strumillo from Gerald Uht. The Strumillos are planning major interior and exterior renovations to the residence including landscape improvements while will benefit all of our property values. The Strumillos would like to erect a screened pool enclosure on the approximate footprint of their existing deck at the rear of the property. Ironically, the existing deck extends into the setback area and has been there since the property was built in 1996, The adjoining property at the rear of the house is the golf course fairway which is bordered by a line of trees. Logic would indicate that this should be a "non -issue" and that the position of the deck should be "grandfathered" having been there for eighteen years! The desire to erect a screened pool enclosure however has breathed "new life" into the set back issue. Scott McCuaig, Strumillos neighbor on the North side, and I recently met Don on site and reviewed the planned improvements. We are troth supportive of the plans and actually wrote letters indicating our approval. I have since been directed to secure broad support from Pointe Verde residents favoring this variance. Attached is an aerial view of the property and a schematic of the existing deck and the outline of the requested screen addition. Note that the deck has a jagged edge on the golf course side that aesthetically and practically needs to be straightened out to allow for the screen's stable erection. httpJ/mail.a�f.Com3856fs 19 ildo:-6k�n-uShn3ii/PrdntAd Ve6ay¢.sSAX f• PHOTOS OF 6950 VERDE WAY VIEW OUT OURBACK WINDOW TOWARDS GOLF COURSE FAIRWAY VIEW FROM ACROSS FAIRWAY LOOKING AT OUR HOUSE (RED CIRCLE). VIEW WILL BE DISTANT AND OBSCURED BY . TREES 0 9 f *VIEW TOWARD EAST NEIGHBOR, MCCUAIG, WHICH WILL BE FURTHER BLOCKED BY PROPOSED LANAI EXPANSION BUILDING VIEW TOWARD WRIGHT HOUSE (RED CIRCLE), WHICH WILL BE FURTHER OBSCURED BY HEDGE PLANTINGS • E • WW 1 40-0, . W IS-0, M 9 ftift -�, =Rk 6; FL-VWONSA-IPDATES Pr .. sm POOL ENCLOSURE PLAN A-1 0 1� wq-qq ---------------------- P----k4wA-r- POOL ENC-LO5URE-GOLONNADE REAR ELEVATION -------------- eqq POOL ENC-LO9JRE-COLONNADE RIGHT 51DE ELEVATION �- E. 3LI,' - F*,Y 8-01 Z. ► z0f 12A�_ NN air—C--3Ww" HIM FeWBONBAMAWS 'PDJOM FRDJM=FO 4-- cffiM wp -- WAM prr px�w 7-A COLLIER COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PERMIT PERMIT #: PRBD2014123551901 PERMIT TYPE: BD ISSUED: BY: APPLIED DATE: 12-22-14 MASTER #: COA: JOB ADDRESS: 6950 Verde WAY JOB DESCRIPTION: RENOVATION INTERIOR, WINDOW & DOOR JOB PHONE: REPLACEMENT, DECK ADDITION, NEW POOL, SCREEN ENCLOSURE 6950 VERDE WAY LOT 9 SUBDIVISION #: FLOOD MAP: FOLIO #: 68160000759 OWNER INFORMATION: VICTORIA LYNN STRUMILLO TRUST 7020 HIGH GROVE BLVD BURR RIDGE , IL 60527- FCC CODE: CONSTRUCTION CODE: 0207 JOB VALUE: $1,900,000.00 BLOCK ZONE: ELEVATION: SECTION -TOWNSHIP -RANGE: 4-49-25 CONTRACTOR INFORMATION: Infinite Renovations LLC 13114 Cardeto Ct Estero, FL 33928 CERTIFICATE #:: Lcc2oi4ww294 APPROVAL DATE: 01-20-15 PHONE: LOT: TOTAL RES SOFT: 6390.00 TOTAL COMM SOFT: 0.00 SETBACKS FRONT: 30 REAR 15 accessory LEFT. 10 RIGHT: 10 SEWER WATER CONTACT NAME: CONTACT PHONE: Per Collier County Ordinance No. 2002-01, as it may be amended, all work must comply with all applicable laws, codes, ordinances, and any additional stipulations or conditions of this permit. This permit expires if work authorized by the permit is not commenced within six (6) months from the date of issuance of the permit Additional fees for failing to obtain permits prior to the commencement of construction may be imposed. Permittee(s) further understands that any contractor that may be employed must be a licensed contractor and that the structure must not be used or occupied until a Certificate of Occupancy is issued NOTICE: PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OF ASBESTOS PRODUCTS OR THE DEMOLITION OF A STRUCTURE, FEDERAL AND STATE LAWS REQUIRE THE PERMITTEE (EITHER THE OWNER OR CONTRACTOR) TO SUBMIT A NOTICE OF THE INTENDED WORK TO THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (DEP). FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT DEP AT (239) 344-5600. In addition to the conditions of this permit, there may be additional restrictions applicable to this property that may be found in the public records of this county, and there may be additional permits required from other governmental entities such as water management districts, state agencies, or federal agencies. WARNING TO OWNER: YOUR FAILURE TO RECORD A NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT MAY RESULT IN YOUR PAYING TWICE FOR EUPROVEMENTS TO YOUR PROPERTY. IF YOU INTEND TO OBTAIN FINANCING, CONSULT WITH YOUR LENDER OR AN ATTORNEY BEFORE RECORDING YOUR NOTICE OF COMMENCEMENT. Attachment A AGENDA ITEM 4-C Co*er County MEMORANDUM TO: COLLIER COUNTY HEARING EXAMINER FROM: ZONING DIVISION GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT HEARING DATE: JULY 23.2015 SUBJECT: PETITION NO: PDI-PL20150000736, NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD PROPERTY OWNER/APPLICANT/AGENT: Owner & Applicant: Naples RV Resort, LLC P.O. Box 9025 La Jolla, CA 92038 REQUESTED ACTION: Agent: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Q. Grady Minor and Associates. P.A. 3800 Via Del Ray Bonita Springs, FL 34134 The petitioner requests the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve an insubstantial change to Ordinance No. 07-85 Naples Motorcoach Resort Commercial Planned Unit Development. The proposed changes are as follows: • Increase the maximum floor area of small motorcoach utility buildings from 100 square feet to 308 square feet; • Decrease the minimum setbacks for personal utility buildings; • Replace the Typical Motorcoach Lot drawing (eliminating the version containing setback information and substituting it with one that omits this information); and • Increase the maximum length of residency from six (6) months to nine (9) months. GEOGRAPHIC LOCATION: The subject property, consisting of 23.2t acres, is located on the south side of Tamiami Trail East (U.S. 41), approximately 3/4-mile east of Collier Boulevard (S.R. 951) in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. PDI-PL20150000736: Naples Motorcoach Resort Page 1 of 8 July 23, 2015 4 to aMD rCA 1aI 10A. mia". 1!1 cola/M ado 0 101 IWINN%—._.: UIB --pto 16}.. OPMM1} _ as as 'o. 25 t unum cwa 4a6 N !4 �$ y A t.l00yllyll Ww..I'ka ovum nas mom ow --' PROJECT s — � '„ Ponspi LOCATION s ."a — ,4nn ycgM[ U6 LCi! WB[S _ to" e s to n :Y" %d1 � M y61 awes EST41R 6j ly .1+61 um s MO 1O1ai. lM[ IE C 17 Ii IS 14 17am= tS �, l W4 W4 20 2z El 24 n LOCATION MAP REWRT P r SITE LOCATION YMrrrrrrrrir��� �� i�`; iFif t Ytf" sr ► �i s,s Y'� ; tllowVs► lop�� ..�o�aeeeeeee�e�epee�peeeses ����.0 sumil if 13 12 93 PAP PETITION # PDI - PL - 2015 - 736 ZONING MAP Aerial Photo (Collier Counh GIS) Aerial Photo (Collier County CIS) PURPOSEMESCRIPTION OF MAP AND TEXT CHANGES: The intent of this application is to modify the CPUD's site development standards to allow each RV lot owner the opportunity to have larger -sized personal utility buildings and smaller minimum setbacks. This request also includes a change to the limitation regarding the maximum time of residency for each RV (from six to nine months). If this application is approved, the development PDI-PL20150000736: Naples Motorcoach Resort Page 3 of 8 July 23, 2015 would still remain as a Commercial Planned Unit Development (CPUD) and reflected as such on the Official Zoning Map. ANALYSIS: The proposed amendments were reviewed by staff, and no outstanding issues remain. The proposed change to the maximum length of stay of RVs, from six (6) months to nine (9) months has no bearing on impact fees or land use classification (i.e., commercial compared to residential). The proposed reductions to setbacks would generally affect the internal portion of the development with no significant impact anticipated external to the RV Park. It should be noted that with respect to the Typical Motorcoach Lot drawing, staff preferred to retain the version that indicated minimum setback information. This preference was communicated to the applicant; however, the information it provided was generally duplicative (to that information in Table 1 in Exhibit B), so the applicant felt it was unnecessary. The setback information shown on the typical drawing is not required by code; therefore, omitting it from the drawing would not be an issue. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPENT INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE CRITERIA: There are three types of changes to a PUD Ordinance: Substantial, Insubstantial, and Minor. An insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or minor change. An insubstantial change to an approved PUD Ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. The criteria and response to each criterion are listed below as follows: Section 10.02.13.E.1 a. Is there a proposed change in the boundary of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)? No, there is no proposed change to the boundary of the CPUD. b. Is there a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development? This amendment would provide each lot owner the option of increasing the size of their personal utility buildings. These structures were contemplated in the original CPUD and are considered accessory to the principal structures (recreational vehicles). RV parks are considered non-residential uses; therefore, there is no density associated with this type of development. With respect to increasing the intensity of land use, this amendment would insignificantly alter the character of the existing development. No changes are proposed to the height of any structure, and the proposed change to the length of residency (for each RV) has no relevance with respect to the intent of this criterion. PDI-PL20150000736: Naples Motorcoach Resort Page 4 of 8 July 23, 2015 C. Is there a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space areas within the development in excess of five (5) percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or five (5) acres in area? The CPUD Master Plan (see attached) illustrates the location of the existing "Motorcoach Lots." Construction of personal utility buildings is confined to this area, which is considered the buildable area of each RV lot. Therefore, staff does not anticipate any decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation, or open space area of that which was already contemplated in the original Master Plan. d. Is there a proposed increase in the size of areas used for non-residential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open space), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses? Notwithstanding the proposed increase to the size of personal utility buildings, this amendment would not increase the size or number of the RVs, which are the principal uses. Staff considers the proposed changes to the site development standards to be inconsequential and irrelevant to the intent of this criterion. e. Is there a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to increases in traffic. generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities? No increase in traffic generation, traffic circulation, or impact on other public facilities is anticipated by this request. f. Will the change result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers? The proposed amendments would not result in land use activities that generate higher levels of vehicular traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers. g. Will the change result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or otherwise increase stormwater discharge? No. The proposed changes would not significantly increase stormwater retention or stormwater discharge from that which was already contemplated. The applicant will be required to submit all appropriate information to SFWMD should this change necessitate modifications to the permitted stormwater management system. The applicant states, "Adequate area exists on -site for stormwater retention, and no change to the approved discharge rate is proposed. No additional stormwater retention areas will be required." PDI-PL20150000736: Naples Motorcoach Resort Page 5 of 8 July 23, 2015 h. Will the proposed change bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use? The proposed changes would not result in an incompatibility with adjacent land uses. i. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the Future Land Use Element or other elements of the Growth Management Plan or which modification would increase the density of intensity of the permitted land uses? No, this modification is in compliance with the Future Land Use Element of the Growth Management Plan (GMP). The modification to the Master Plan does not increase the intensity of the permitted land uses. The PUD Document also specifies the uses allowed and provides development standards that regulate the setbacks and height of allowable structures. As a result, the proposed amendment would not change the approved intensity authorized by the PUD Document or otherwise affect any element of the GMP. j. The proposed change is to a PUD District designated as a Development of Regional Impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to Sec. 380.06 (19), F.S. Any change that meets the criterion of Sec. 380.06 (19)9e)2., F.S., and any changes to a DRI/PUD Master Plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under Sec. 2.7.3.5.4 or Sec. 2.7.3.5.6 of this Code. The Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD is not a Development of Regional Impact and therefore, this criterion is not applicable. k. Are there any modifications to the PUD Master Plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under Section(s)10.02.13 E.? Based upon the analysis provide above, the proposed change is not deemed to be substantial. Approval by the Hearing Examiner shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application and action should be taken at a regularly scheduled meeting. Section 10.02.13.E.2 Does this petition change the analysis of the findings and criteria used for the original application? No, the proposed amendments to the PUD Document do not change the original analysis for the original application and staff report. PDI-PL20150000736: Naples Motorcoach Resort Page 6 of 8 July 23, 2015 NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING (NIM)• The applicant advertised a NIM for June 2, 2015 at the Naples Motorcoach Resort clubhouse (13300 Tamiami Trail East). No members of the public attended the meeting. COUNTY ATTORNEY OFFICE REVIEW: This staff report was sent to the County Attorney's Office on June 25, 2015. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Collier County Hearing Examiner approve Petition PDI-PL20150000736, Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD. Attachments: A. Application B. Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD Proposed PUD Document Exhibits PDI-PL20150000736: Naples Motorcoach Resort Page 7 of 8 July 23, 2015 PREPARED BY: ERIC L JOHNSON, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT REVIEWED BY: RAY D V. BELLOWS, ZONING MANAGER DATE GRO MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT MICHAEL BOSI, AICP, DIRECTOR DATE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT PDI-PL20150000736: Naples Motorcoach Resort Page 8 of 8 July 23, 2015 i CA7 County • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collieraov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 INSUBSTANTIALCH TO A Pdb` (PDQ �LDG echo ld02.13 E 8e Code of maws section 2-83 — 2-9ii .. Ch`3 6:3 of the Administrative ;Code ,.. Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.2, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 and shall require the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application. PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPUCAh1T CONTACT INFORMATION • Name of Applicant(s): Naples RV Resort LLC Address: P.O. BOX 9025 City. La Jolla State: CA Zip: 92038 Telephone:858-776-0929 Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: melissa@paydarproperties.com Name of Agent: D. Wayne Arnold, AICP Firm: Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. Address: 3800 Via Del Rey City Bonita springs State: FL Zip: 34134 Telephone:239.947.1144 Cell: Fax:239.947.0375 E-Mail Address: warnold@gradyminor.com ti)StI�F I ' f EREST IINFC�>ItMA 0q�Q�V� Is the applicant the owner of the subject property? ■❑ Yes ❑ No ❑ 1. If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name the beneficiaries below. • Q 2. If applicant is corporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers and major stockholders below. 9/25/2014 Page 1 of 4 Coder Coanty COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliercov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ❑ 3. if applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, so indicate and name principals below. ❑ 4. If applicant is an owner, indicate exactly as recorded, and list all other owners, if any. ❑ 5. If applicant is a lessee, attach copy of lease, and indicate actual owners if not indicated on the lease. ❑ 6. If applicant is a contract purchaser, attach copy of contract, and indicate actual owner(s) name and address below: (if space is inadequate, attach on separate page) t3E1`AIL OF REtLIIEST `,:.. :. On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1. • tlt)RIAT)ON> PUD NAME: Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD ORDINANCE NUMBER: 2007-85 FOLIO NUMBER(S)• Please see Exhibit 1 attached Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). If applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a legal description for subject portion. Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change. Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? Q Yes ❑ No If no, please explain: Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑■ No If yes, in whose name? Has any portion of the PUD been ❑ SOLD and/or 0 DEVELOPED? Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? 0 Yes ❑ No • If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet. 9/25/2014 Page 2 of 4 Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD Exhibit 1 - Folio Numbers ParceIID Namel StreetNumber FullStreet NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13309 TROUT LN •62380000027 62380000043 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 62380000069 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 62380000085 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13363 SNOOK CIR 62380000108 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 62380000124 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13323 TROUT LN 62380000140 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13650 SNOOK CIR 62380000166 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13599 SNOOK CIR 62380000182 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13543 SNOOK CIR 62380000205 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13519 SNOOK CIR 62380000221 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 62380000247 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13330 TROUT LN 62380000263 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13303 SNOOK CIR 62380000289 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13307 SNOOK CIR 62380000302 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13311 SNOOK CIR 62380000328 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13315 SNOOK CIR 62380000344 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13319 SNOOK CIR 62380000360 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13323 SNOOK CIR 62380000386 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13327 SNOOK CIR 62380000409 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13331 SNOOK CIR 62380000425 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13335 SNOOK CIR 62380000441 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13339 SNOOK CIR NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13343 SNOOK CIR •62380000467 62380000483 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13347 SNOOK CIR 62380000506 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13351 SNOOK CIR 62380000548 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13359 SNOOK CIR 62380000564 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13367 SNOOK CIR 62380000580 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13371 SNOOK CIR 62380000603 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13375 SNOOK CIR 62380000629 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13379 SNOOK CIR 62380000645 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13383 SNOOK CIR 62380000661 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13387 SNOOK CIR 62380000687 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13391 SNOOK CIR 62380000700 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13395 SNOOK CIR 62380000726 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13399 SNOOK CIR 62380000742 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13403 SNOOK CIR 62380000807 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13415 SNOOK CIR 62380000849 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13423 SNOOK CIR 62380000865 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 14327 SNOOK CIR 62380000881 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13431 SNOOK CIR 62380000904 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13435 SNOOK CIR 62380000920 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13439 SNOOK CIR 62380000946 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13443 SNOOK CIR 62380000962 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13447 SNOOK CIR NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13451 SNOOK CIR •62380000988 62380001000 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13455 SNOOK CIR Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD Exhibit 1 - Folio Numbers 62380001026 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13459 SNOOK CIR 62380001042 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13463 SNOOK CIR • 62380001068 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13467 SNOOK CIR 62380001165 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13487 SNOOK CIR 62380001181 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13491 SNOOK CIR 62380001204 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13495 SNOOK CIR 62380001220 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13499 SNOOK CIR 62380001246 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13503 SNOOK CIR 62380001262 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13507 SNOOK CIR 62380001288 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13511 SNOOK CIR 62380001327 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13547 SNOOK CIR 62380001343 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13551 SNOOK CIR 62380001369 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13SSS SNOOK CIR 62380001385 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13559 SNOOK CIR 62380001408 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13563 SNOOK CIR 62380001424 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13567 SNOOK CIR 62380001440 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13571 SNOOK CIR 62380001466 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13575 SNOOK CIR 62380001482 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13579 SNOOK CIR 62380001505 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13583 SNOOK CIR 62380001521 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13587 SNOOK CIR 62380001547 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13591 SNOOK CIR 62380001563 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13595 SNOOK CIR 62380001589 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13607 SNOOK CIR 62380001602 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13611 SNOOK CIR 62380001628 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13615 SNOOK CIR 62380001644 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13619 SNOOK CIR 62380001660 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13623 SNOOK CIR 62380001686 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13627 SNOOK CIR 62380001709 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13631 SNOOK CIR 62380001725 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13635 SNOOK CIR 62380001741 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13639 SNOOK CIR 62380001864 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13588 SNOOK CIR 62380001880 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13584 SNOOK CIR 62380001903 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13580 SNOOK CIR 62380001929 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13576 SNOOK CIR 62380002025 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13556 SNOOK CIR 62380002041 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13552 SNOOK CIR 62380002067 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13548 SNOOK CIR 62380002083 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13544 SNOOK CIR 62380002106 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13540 SNOOK CIR 62380002122 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13536 SNOOK CIR 62380002148 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13530 SNOOK CIR 62380002164 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13526 SNOOK CIR 62380002180 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13542 SNAPPER LN 62380002203 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13546 SNAPPER LN • 62380002229 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13550 SNAPPER LN Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD Exhibit 1 - Folio Numbers 62380002245 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13554 SNAPPER LN NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13558 SNAPPER LN •62380002261 62380002287 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13562 SNAPPER LN 62380002300 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13566 SNAPPER LN 62380002326 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13570 SNAPPER LN 62380002342 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13574 SNAPPER LN 62380002368 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13578 SNAPPER LN 62380002407 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13586 SNAPPER LN 62380002423 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13590 SNAPPER LN 62380002449 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13594 SNAPPER LN 62380002465 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13598 SNAPPER LN 62380002481 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13602 SNAPPER LN 62380002520 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13636 SNOOK CIR 62380002546 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13629 SNAPPER LN 62380002562 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13625 SNAPPER LN 62380002589 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13621 SNAPPER LN 62380002601 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13617 SNAPPER LN 62380002627 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13613 SNAPPER LN 62380002643 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13609 SNAPPER LN 62380002669 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13605 SNAPPER LN 62380002685 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13601 SNAPPER LN 62380002708 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13597 SNAPPER LN 62380002724 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13593 SNAPPER LN NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13589 SNAPPER LN •62380002740 62380002766 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13585 SNAPPER LN 62380002782 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13581 SNAPPER LN 62380002805 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13577 SNAPPER LN 62380002821 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13573 SNAPPER LN 62380002847 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13569 SNAPPER LN 62380002863 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13565 SNAPPER LN 62380002889 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13561 SNAPPER LN 62380002902 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13557 SNAPPER LN 62380002960 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13490 SNOOK CIR 62380002986 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13486 LADYFISH LN 62380003008 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13482 LADYFISH LN 62380003024 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13478 LADYFISH LN 62380003040 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13474 LADYFISH LN 62380003082 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13466 LADYFISH LN 62380003105 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13462 LADYFISH LN 62380003121 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13458 LADYFISH LN 62380003202 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13442 LADYFISH LN 62380003309 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13422 LADYFISH LN 62380003325 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13418 LADYFISH LN 62380003341 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13642 SNOOK CIR 62380003383 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13449 LADYFISH LN NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13453 LADYFISH LN •62380003406 62380003422 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13457 LADYFISH LN Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD Exhibit t - Folio Numbers 62380003448 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13461 LADYFISH LN 62380003464 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13465 LADYFISH LN 62380003480 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13469 LADYFISH LN • 62380003503 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13473 LADYFISH LN 62380003529 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13477 LADYFISH LN 62380003545 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13481 LADYFISH LN 62380003587 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13472 SNOOK CIR 62380003600 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13468 SNOOK CIR 62380003626 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13464 SNOOK CIR 62380003642 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13460 SNOOK CIR 62380003668 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13456 SNOOK CIR 62380003684 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13448 SNOOK CIR 62380003707 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13440 SNOOK CIR 62380003723 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13430 SNOOK CIR 62380003749 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13420 SNOOK CIR 62380003804 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13398 SNOOK CIR 62380003820 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13394 SNOOK CIR 62380003846 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13390 SNOOK CIR 62380003862 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13386 SNOOK CIR 62380003888 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13382 SNOOK CIR 62380003901 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13378 SNOOK CIR 62380003927 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13374 SNOOK CIR is 0 • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.collieraov.net • �0.t�erCa�H:nty 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre A 1kabon Meeting and nat."mittal Requirement. Checkitst ttJD 1n;ltiai Change . u +Etiapter a:3 4 the Administrative. Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accented. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW # OF COPIES REQUIRED NOT REQUIRE Completed Application (download current form from County website) 16 X Pre -Application Meeting notes 1 X Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes and why amendment is necessary 16 El ❑ Detail of request x Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy X Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy x Revised Text and any exhibits LJ El 0 PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined X PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance # X Warranty Deed El Li Legal Description ET ID Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended I Q If PUD is platted, include plat book pages X List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 2 X Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized 2 X Completed Addressing Checklist 1 XEl Copy of 8 % in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site 1 X Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. ❑ X❑ ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 9/25/2014 Page 3 of 4 Co�County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLE5, FLORIDA 34104 www.collieritoy.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: ci School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Sayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: I Executive Director Utilities Engineering: Kris VanLen en Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad Emergency Management: Dan Summers Naples Airport Authority: Ted Solida Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Other: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: ❑ PUD Amendment insubstantial (PDQ: $1,500.00 ❑ Pre-Appikation Meeting: $500.00 0 Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.00 The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Applicant/Owner Signature KKIA Pr OC Applicant/Owner Name (please print) $ I Ito ( S Dat ,.7 9/25/2014 Page 4 of 4 is U 0 0 Pre-Ap�lica�tn Meeting Notes Petition Type:-ruUCrrN =.- Date and Time: '�]' jFJ © V-Y-',a=- Assigned Planner:r� Engineering Manager (for PPL's and FP's): Project information Project Name: PL #: '24-4 • b Property ID #: Current Zoning: Project Address: 1EW5r6L7 City: State: R.21p: Applicant: • Agent Name: Phone: Agent/Firm Address: City: State: Zip: Property Owner: Please provide the following, if applicable: i. Total Acreage: ii. Proposed # of Residential Units: ill. Proposed Commercial Square Footage: ,�.��JJ�� iv. For Amendments, indicate the original petition number: ��K�) d� ' P111i3_ V. If there is an Ordinance or Resolution associated with this project, please indicate the type and number: vi. If the project is within a Plat, provide the name and AR#/PL#: Rev 4/1/15 Meeting Notes \/ Oil • Rev A/1/15 Coilier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION, NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.calliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 -- INSUBSTANTIAL CHANGE TO A PUD (PDQ LDC subsection 10.02.13 E & Code of Laws section 2-83 — 2-90 Ch. 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code Pursuant to LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.2, a PUD insubstantial change includes any change that is not considered a substantial or a minor change. A PUD insubstantial change to an approved PUD ordinance shall be based upon an evaluation of LDC subsection 10.02.13 E.1 and shall require the review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. The Hearing Examiner's approval shall be based on the findings and criteria used for the original application. PETITION NO PROJECT NAME To be completed by staff DATE PROCESSED APPLICANT CONTACT INFORMATION Name of Applicant(s): Address: City: State: 211): Telephone: Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: Name of Agent: Firm: Address: City: State: ZIP: Telephone: Cell: Fax: E-Mail Address: DISCLOSURE OF INTEREST INFORMATION Is the applicant the owner of the subject property? ❑ Yes ❑ No • ❑ 1. If applicant is a land trust, so indicate and name the beneficiaries below. ❑ 2. If applicant is corporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers and major stockholders below. • 9/25/2014 Page 1 of 4 Cot[i"er County COWER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.calliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 ❑ 3. If, applicant is a partnership, limited partnership or other business entity, so indicate and name principals below. ❑ 4. If applicant is an owner, indicate exactly as recorded, and list all other owners, if any. ❑ 5. If applicant is a lessee, attach copy of lease, and indicate actual owners if not indicated on the lease. ❑ 6. If applicant is a contract purchaser, attach copy of -contract, and indicate actual owner(s) name and address below: (If space is inadequate, attach on separate page) DETAIL OF REQUEST On a separate sheet, attached to the application, describe the insubstantial change request. Identify how the request does not meet the PUD substantial change criteria established in LDC . subsection 10.02.13 E.1. PROPERTY INFORMATION PUD NAME: ORDINANCE NUMBER: FOLIO NUMBER(S): Provide a legal (if PUD is recorded) or graphic description of area of amendment (this may be graphically illustrated on Amended PUD Master Plan). if applying for a portion of the PUD, provide a legal description for subject portion. Attach on a separate sheet, a written description of the map or text change. Does amendment comply with the Growth Management Plan? ❑ Yes ❑ No If no, please explain: Has a public hearing been held on this property within the last year? ❑ Yes ❑ No If yes, in whose name? Has any portion of the PUD been ❑ SOLD and/or ❑ DEVELOPED? Are any changes proposed for the area sold and/or developed? ❑ Yes ❑ No • If yes, please describe on an attached separate sheet. 9/25/2014 Page 2 of 4 Collier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 2S2-2400 FAX: (239) 252-63S8 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Insubstantial Change Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Incomplete submittals will not be accepted. REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIREDR NOT EQUIRED Completed Application (download current form from County website) 16 Pre -Application Meeting notes 1 Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes and why amendment is necessary 16 ❑ Detail of request Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy Revised Text and any exhibits PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance # Warranty Deed Legal Description Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended rw—i"irdW❑ if PUD is platted, include plat book pages List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 2 Affidavit of Authorization, signed & notarized 2 Completed Addressing Checklist 1 Copy of 8 Y: in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 91 � ❑ *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement. ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 0 9/25/2014 Page 3 of 4 0 Co1*7 County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6359 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart Bayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Utilities Engineering: Kris Van Lengen Lj I Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad Emergency Management: Dan Summers Naples Airport Authority: Ted Solida Conservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Other: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS PP PUD Amendment Insubstantial (PDI): $1,500.00 Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.00 The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation . ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Applicant/Owner Signature Date Applicant/Owner Name (please print) 0 9/25/2014 Page 4 of 4 Cor County 0 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -in Sheet PL #: -Oe�C1-D CR''5 Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Richard Anderson Environmental Review 252-2483 richardanderson@colliergov.net ❑ David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net ❑ Summer Araque Environmental Review 252-6290 summerbrownaraque@colliergov.net ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 StephenBaluch@colliergov.net ❑ Madelin Bunster Architectural Review 252-8523 madelinbunster@colliergov.net ❑ Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5165 markburtchin@collier ov.net ❑ George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543 georgecascio@colliergov.net ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidlashton@colfier&ov.net._._ Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 suefaulkner@colliergov.net Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Plan Review 252-2434 ericfey@colliergov.net ❑ Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman@colliergov.net ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michaelgibbons@colliergov.net ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundlach@colliergov.net ❑ Shar Hin son East Naples Fire District 687-5650 shingson@ccfco.org ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Services 252-5757 johnhouldsworth@colliergov.net ❑ Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 'odihughes@colliergov.net ❑ Alicia Humphries Right -Of -Way Permitting 252-2326 aliciahumphries@colliergov.net ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall@colliergov.net ❑ Reed Jarvi, P.E. Transportation Planning 252-5849 reedjarvi@colliergov.net ❑ Stephen Lenber er Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger@colliergov.net ❑ Paulo Martins Utilities 252-4285 paulomartins@colliergov.net ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Fire Safety 252-7348 Thomasmastroberto@colliergov.net ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. En ineering Services 252-2911 'ackmckenna@colliergov.net ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmclean@colliergov.net ❑ Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility Impact Fees 252-4215 gilbertmoncivaiz@colliergov.net ❑ Michele Mosca, AICP Impact Fee Administration 252-2466 michelemosca@colliergov.net ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 annismoxam@colliergov.net ❑ Mariam Ocheltree Graphics 252-2315 mariamocheltree@colliergov.net ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandyotero@colliergov.net ❑ Bill Pancake North Naples Fire District 252-2310 billpancake@colliergov.net ❑ John Podczerwins I Transportation Planning 252-5890 1 johnpodczerwinsky@colliergov.net Rev 4/1/15 � 0 Co tr County ❑ Brand! Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipollard@colliergov.net ❑ Fred Reischl, AICP Zoning Services 252-4211 fredreischl@colliergov.net ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Stormwater Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenblum@coillergov.net Michael Sawyer Zoning Services 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net ❑ Chris Scott, AICP Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net ❑ Daniel Smith, AICP Landscape Review 252-4312 danielsmith@colliergov.net ❑ Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-8400 scottstone@colliergov.net ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net ❑ Carolina Valera Comprehensive Planning 252-8498 carolinavalera@colliergov.net ❑ Kris VanLengen Utility Planning 252-5366 krisvanlengen@colliergov.net ❑ Jon Walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwaish@colliergov.net ❑ David Weeks, AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-5518 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net ❑ Christine Willoughby Planning and Zoning 252-5748 ChristineWilloughby@colliergov.net Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name Representing Phone Email /vcApoc v --4 v IVO Rev 4/1/15 cc) rn, Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD Insubstantial Change to a PUD Project Narrative and Detail of Request Project Narrative The Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD was approved in 2007 as Ordinance 2007-85. The resort has been platted into 184 motorcoach sites and approximately 30 sites have been sold to date. Improvements include internal roads, stormwater, buffers/walls, amenity area and storage facilities. The property owner/developer is proposing minor changes to the PUD document which would increase the size of the allowed small utility buildings on each individual lot from 100 square feet to a maximum of 308 square feet. Changes are also proposed to the building setbacks for the utility buildings, which are reflected in the modified development standards table. Additionally the applicant proposes to delete the current exhibit that depicts typical lot details and replace with an exhibit that provides less detail, which will permit more flexibility while maintaining consistency with the approved development standards table. The applicant also proposes to modify the length of residency from 6 months to 9 months. Detail of Request Insubstantial Change Criteria LDC Subsection 10.02.13 E.I E. Changes and amendments. There are three types of changes to a PUD Ordinance: Substantial, Insubstantial, and Minor. Language changes to a previously approved PUD document shall require the same procedure as for amending the official zoning atlas, except for the removal of a commitment for payment towards affordable housing which is considered to be a minor change as described in Section 10.02.13 E.3.c. 1. Substantial changes. Any substantial change(s) to an approved PUD Ordinance shall require the review and recommendation of the Planning Commission and approval by the Board of County Commissioners as a PUD amendment prior to implementation. Applicants shall be required to submit and process a new application complete with pertinent supporting data, as set forth in sections 10.02.13 A and B. For the purpose of this section, a substantial change shall be deemed to exist where: a. There is a proposed change in the boundary of the PUD; or N/A b. There is a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development; Is Revised 04117/2015 • N/A c. There is a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation or open space areas within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or 5 acres in area; No net change in preserve, recreation or open space results from this amendment. d. There is a proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses; No increase in non-residential uses or areas for non-residential uses are proposed. e. There is a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities; No additional traffic or public facility impacts will result from the request. f. The change will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular • traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers; • No new uses are proposed. g. The change will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or will otherwise increase stormwater discharges; Adequate area exists on -site for stormwater retention, and no change to the approved discharge rate is proposed. No additional stormwater retention areas will be required. h. The change will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use; N/A. i. Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the future land use element or other element of the growth management plan or which modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses; Revised 04/17/2015 The PUD and proposed changes are consistent with the Collier County • Growth Management Plan. j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. § 380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this section 10.02.13 of this Code; or The project is not a DRI. k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this section 10.02.13 The proposed modifications do not meet the standards for a substantial modification and create no external impacts. • �i Revised 04/17/2015 PUD DJ� LEGEND -- revue roam qn a1Raww Piew � rsnas w FMRl� ® wre ars rr BOAT s7onAaE LOCATM YAP cs ♦ LAND USE SUMMARY Tm FOOT SUFFER \` �^-or- T 1,> ASR 1L7% aw _f 1 �` FOR OCVNIR7N p tar A" xv A.R RRAX ! .[r! • ' ' f r munw R ro"T smun 0.6 fad LW /A IlATM i Ornm TRAer as wt tm Noup / �{ E1 i i A/CU t (RDOOMW CRnp t.l Uk 449 SOA RAV L.» ! 1y� 1.9 bA 7AX ``\� Q LANSU E Aft" a3 Ar! VAR OF PAW OWLn a 1 eif �1 A 7 '� , , 1F w•c Y Rns iDTY FROA.CF AR4 23A As 10tl{ •TOTAL OFDI yM R(OY1R[0 k 101L YIYIIW m i Ib.R011�OW0 ;!may ♦ g• ;� N M J � N r ��x nena r _ '�rAH RRUE1rOTE _-..--_-__�___ ___- � aVIVOL r. - / ! ►Rsvn tFt a T -----' !f ' I. KT PAD) Row Cu SECTION-'E' 1 3�1 t sOo.L r fllDl .wt ' MOTOR LDTS r w t�wuwT ap +ww w =w - FEYi i DA NFf'ER i i rurlr M A RRAr r 1 W FOR DATgrr /5 BATH .. y ♦ f I I ado tRtp p11 s°roRnoc -�� _ -- rrraFRrn 1F[ __ ----- 1 i • ,r ---------------------- r rwa a1O twmwor CROW Rout M%C) --- li TYPICAL. 14 W177WAL R.0.W. ROADWAY X10N C7 I'GO. bC HR11 �Y �T'� YIr Oat%�Ryyrl K 1ARr 1Al NAPI,ES MOTORCOACH RESORT, INC. � C.P.U.D. MASTER PLAN "..?r'i�Z'��' «,..., NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT IMRD-M M34-1 "" "' • w.w1rR EXHIBIT - C itµ C Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD Amend Ordinance Number 2007-85 • EXHIBIT A, PERMITTED USES ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 2007-85, THE NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD, IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: EXHIBIT A NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD ALLOWABLE USES PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Class A motorcoach vehicles, as described herein. One (1) Class A motorcoach vehicle per "lot" (assigned parking space). Definition: Motorcoach vehicles shall be defined as those vehicles which have been categorized by the Recreational Vehicle Industry Association of America (RVIA), and the Family Motorcoach Association (FMA), as Class "A" or "Motorcoaches" and/or factory customized bus conversions, that: (a) are mobil, in accordance with the code of standards of the RVIA and FMA; (b) are self- • propelled, and completely self-contained vehicles, which include all the conveniences of a home including, but not limited to cooking, sleeping, shower and bathroom facilities; (c) are structured so that the driver's seat is accessible from the living area in a walking position; (d) contain a minimum interior height of 6 feet in the living areas; (e) have a minimum length of 35 feet, a maximum length of 45 feet and a maximum width of 102 inches plus slide outs; and (f) have a fixed roof, as opposed to the "pop-up" variety. 2. any other use or service which is comparable in nature with the uses set forth herein and is found to be compatible in the district by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Amenities customarily associated with recreational vehicle parks, such as recreation and social facilities (both indoor and outdoor) administration buildings, service/maintenance buildings, bathrooms, laundries and similar services for occupants of the park. Recreation facilities may include but are not limited to swimming pools, tennis courts, boating facilities, playground and clubhouse for indoor recreation. 2. Utility buildings as may be required for the operation or maintenance of the park not to exceed 1000 s.f. • Words underlined are additions, words s mA Areugh are deletions Naples Mworcoach Resort CPUD, PDI Last Revised 0612212015 Page I of 7 3. Twenty-seven (27) proposed docs. 4. The existing boat ramp. isS. A boat storage facility in the approximate location shown on the CPUD Master Plan, with up to 32 spaces. The actual maximum height of the building shall be 15 feet. • • 6. Enclosed utility/storage area up to three hundred eight (308) square feet inclusive of all added roofs over entries except typical roof overhangs Any utility/storage area may be located adjacent to its associated recreation vehicle in compliance with the setbacks provided in Exhibit B, Development Standards Principal and Accessory Structures of this document. The utility/storage area may be a continuous part of a screened -in porch where such a porch is attached to the vehicle as herein provided. However, the combined square footage of the enclosed utility/storage area and screened porch shall not exceed 308 square feet An enclosed utility/storage structure may not be used as a dwelling unit or a guesthouse and it shall not contain a bed or bedroom. The enclosed utility/storage structure shall not be occupied unless an occupied recreational vehicle is present on the lot. The primary entrance to the enclosed utility/storage structure shall face the recreational vehicle. - Words underlined are additions, words &ftw{F t wwgh are deletions Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD, PDI Last Revised 0612212015 Page 2 of 7 EXHIBIT " B", ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PRINCIPAL AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES", ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 2007-85, THE NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD, IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: EXHIBIT B NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PRINCIPAL AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Minimum Lot Area Minimum Tract Area Minimum Lot Width Minimum Tract Width 2200 SF NIA 30 Feet NIA TABLE 1 MINIMUM SETBACKS (IN FEET) U.S.41 HENDERSON DRIVE HENDERSON CREEK (from D.E.) FRONT SIDE REAR MAX BLDG HEIGHT* Office 25' 25, 25' 10' 10, 10, 25' / 32' Clubhouse 25' 25' 25' 15'** 15' 20' 25'/40' Bathhouse 50' 25, 25, 20, S' 25' 20' / 27' Maintenance Bldg 25' 15' 25' 20' 5' 15, 25' / 32' Boat Storage Bldg 25' 15, 25' 10' 5' 15, 13' / 15' Personal Utility Bldgs. 2-&'20' 15' 2.5-'•10'/15'**** 15, 0 4-5'-5'***** 10' / 17' Pool Deck 20' 15' 15' 15, 5' 15, NA Tennis Courts 20' 20' 25' 20' 10, 10, N/A Guard House N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 20' / 25' Motorcoach Slabs 25' 20' 20' N/A 0/9*** 10, NA Other Accessory Bldg 25' 25' 25' 10, 10, 10, 25' / 32' * Maximum zoned building height per LDC definition / Maximum actual building height per definition ** The porte cochere for the clubhouse shall be located 3 feet from the right-of-way. *** 0' setback on one side of lot and 9' minimum on other side; side setback for motorcoach slabs only shall be measured 20 feet from back of curb **** Personal Utility Buildings may be permitted to be constructed up to but may not encroach into a landscape buffer easement. ***** Personal Utility Buildings may be permitted to be constructed up to but may not encroach into a landscape buffer easement or a lake maintenance easement. Words underlined are additions, words strweAwough are deletions Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD, PDI Last Revised 0612212015 Page 3 of 7 • • 0 EXHIBIT B-1, ENTITLED "NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TYPICAL • MOTORCOACH LOT", ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 2007-85, THE NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD, IS HEREBY AMENDED: 0 Words underlined are additions, words shswk Am are deletions Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD, PDI Last Revised 0612212015 Page 4 of 7 I MINIMUM LOT TYPICAL SLAB & UTILITY BLDG TYPICAL VEHICLE TYPICAL NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD M. 0. r—ft Vlaor and Ab lab L P.A, GradyMinor � �� o� — 11.OWSt.1.e..n k%34134 EXHIBITB-1 - "'•"------- LA1 l t:tvil Nmglnecns laW Stirvt- m . Planners . Landw-a amWets DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS -- _ "a w PA1N. ,, U+, tAML.IAMR„51 u.26000 s TYPICAL MOTORCOACH LOT A° ' xonlla ymnrc 239.947.1144 rrrv. cra4r47inor. VON Pen.".m: 239.$W.4A9a sxr� 1 or t r EXHIBIT F, DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS SPECIFIC TO THE PROJECT, ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 2007-85, THE NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD, IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: EXHIBIT F • NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS SPECIFIC TO THE PROJECT 5. HURRICANE PROTECTION/PERMANENT LOCATION OF MOTORCOACH VEHICLES Motorcoach vehicles may not be permanently located on any lot and no permanent residency is allowed. Homestead exemptions are prohibited. The maximum stay shall be &i*-nine months per year. Within 60 days of plat approval, the developer shall record a covenant running with the land in the Public Records of Collier County referencing this restriction on permanent residency. The owner, or user, of the unit is responsible for registering his or her arrival and departure with the manager of the resort. Failure to register shall hold the owner or user responsible for any penalties imposed by Collier County. No unoccupied motorcoaches shall be left on site during the hurricane season and all motorcoaches must be removed from the subject project if a hurricane watch is issued. Words underlined are additions, words Hugh are deletions Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD, PDI Last Revised 0612212015 Page 7 of 7 C7 • Q 4305425' OR: 4460 PG: 1144 RICORDID it OIFICIAL HCOUS of COLLINR COVER, IL 06/09/2009 at 11:1ZU DVIGNT 1. BNOCN, CUB Be 111 35.50 DOC-.70 .70 • Retn:tlPRZSS/QPS RECORDING REQUESTED BY CLOSING un AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: 250 BILK CROSSING BLVD #4 ROC®STNR NI 14624 Fix Spindelman Brovitz & Goldman, PC 295 Woodcliff Drive, Suite 200 Fairport, New York 14450 Attn.: Richard S. Brovitz, Esq. Consideration = $0 QUITCLAIM DEED FOR VALUABLE CONSIDE @q�j which is hereby acknowledged, Morgan Acquisitions LLC ("Transferor") es,d forever quitclaims to Naples RV Resort LLC, a Delaware limite 'a ' ' compan}, 11 o ror's right, title and interest, if any, in and to that certain real pro �Propert ") loc ted " the County of Colliers, State of Florida, as more particular sc on x i it A a ch hereto, together with all of Transferor's right, title and " to 1 He es and rights appurtenant to the • Real Property and pertainin or 1 an e 'o e n ere "th. n H (� 1�0 P►its-d- P► ��s� �E CIRC OR: 4460 PG: 1145 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Quitclaim Deed as of June 1, 2009. TRANSFEROR: MORGAN ACQUISIT LLC By: N e: Robe&e Morgan "title: Manager WITNESSES: Print name: 0 • is OR: 4460 PG: 1146 0 ACKNOWLEDGMENT ATTACHED TO QUITCLAIM DEED State of /U a) YDrK ) ss County of r bfir0.- ) The O oing instrument was acknowledged before me thisa� day of , 2009, by as ��r of MORGAN ACQUIS IONS LLC, a Florida limited liabi itycompany, who is personally known to me or- has-1weduced co G z4lmu igna of P o Taking Acknowledgment bli State of &e*) for • 0 o Commission O i O ires: T o E CLRC ""' OR: 4460 PG: 1147 EXHIBIT A TO QUITCLAIM DEED Real property in the County of Colliers, State of Florida, described as follows: All of NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 49, Pages 35 through 40, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. Gpl,1'�R CQU\ ti oF�'NE CIRC'� 0 0 • • • NAPLE5 MOTOR COAL H RE50RT A REPLAY OF A PORTION OF BLOCK 'L', HENDERSON CREEK PARK 1ST ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, AT PACE 41 AND LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEDICATIONS/RESERVATIONS YM[MoENLDaTOIRWwA/DRN BY MRaOIlliO, A FlA Nm NA CAUqNTOPUTwRE= ANNADM M LANDS NEE[IE`URE NE YApT AA INLPATIENTS NVAArtT L A D Tt TO talon NbINtt, In axuNEWE W AIINNL L A NW-[NTODoIC ACCEE' [A41OIT (LAL[. NAQ AIDS ACROA nAO,'R' rW VNE Pr GAN11NCY RX w N M p[wN01i TINR w Am PNAUINO n Inn amXT m LYI NwIOAI 4AN NR NPMnp1 Do P AND 8o IO M . t. ov p am GSEAINIn tOTA1E0 Illo DIPN:1[0 N[REW (CLLE, P.LLG, 0.E. NA.L) NN m A[DoONN'RI1T n D . rpR vAlnowNA. T. AL WADIANE GN v (at) AN DEIKRD Mcom NM NO NTP samurc IW NANNIONNOX a AEL 1.IR[ W m"wA L [ASENTIn (LIE[.) M omcFEv Mco. NUN Iq N[FOINNUry PN1 NA11TpA11W. L DEWAR w(a10R cOUNTI=A SrNN NNIIOP. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 1CDIM NYCTW, OK �ML ON �L NW ONIO mE NWTOOF �f[ w PEAPENI NIY A — OF — L AN A PWNN1 V rAGRO 0.001E A AW AI. 9JP1 PINPNE[, NVwr I[YdINp11T [W YNNOIN1fL MOUWW OW PAAI1RL, q R OMM N MT NOW P, PAC[ L OF N[ /VNEQ NOWA q Ool11p CRNIY MORM NIP A'JI IYNO M A IORTW s. AL NIDNI MiG NN NE'Ell GW111[a R'11a1F11O® TIM DID PLATIED ARG. IIPW OF SEEN J MN 4 INEY[NlN1 fA+L( IIE NIRINN AOCap1Y TO TT A AM OF SION N1pY UTEDr TAOIlR1 PDNEVAEr m M A'PUNFNE NOW" IG7 M4LW q II[[pi0 N PEAT DNmI • AT IANE a O M PUNEA R[NNARWL NRUNNO (NONE YT IWM N M 000E Do LAN! I,10 OrAo Nt[x WM1W IN. NE(ORDa Do WAD OgNI'. LOCATED N NEOTIOM x too," N SpUD�1DL�RAO[ NE Gaxx NW w. RWNA NN BBIID YONt soul" C 0ENC11rt TD fo111N1 CNMIY, An FRAICINIQ.! MAD M EAa! MA0.tT AIM OWiRN AND RGOL WMD N IOIOOa! DP ILOW Lµ, IBOpLW WIND PNN nr (,L[,) N'N9PON INSOF 1. A NW-G0.U1K Aft GIpNRNAN[E IIiLAi M IIONMEiM[ faMN AM[PAID NN7l aA p MONAIEIC EpOPOa A C0.tAl1 O MONIED ROK T OAR WK N�1N0[Wa A� NSMIS IGNrcNN pLTIaoNY Am e11aN [dal NANn1aAME TNEN A Mart Ar VI NmMmNNI W M fNIR1�TplY r.IDI o1_Mr UK Do al. "Noi r a (wNNY IfAAD A wam Poor NNE Neff-R-Mr 0. 0[NCAR A NW-OOMM NpIC NUrc [As/YpT b. m ML NWIW W NAWNRD AN K 1pRllr NOIrhOMAN, LML a MMOGpI M'.[ A NO FOOT ITN � TININKE NUN xa01YA1'f.. NYN M Ga[ IM OP MNNY W PAaAn emm AS NIONU W I'm Mr FDA YIUn /WOt; N0A0M0 (PINNNTmo NNAU0,ICK NaNIDIANR NN Mp.AlION Do TEW RISPIONR FAWIII[x [p11Wp L ApN M ON FONT-O-Mr NNE OF am) RpONEOeI SNY PER A OWNERS V ALU IHN I1NEENE NN LV1E R1aMNW MNNEm AYT s11O1 uBA NE aINiTOT A A1N INOr YI, NT NM M UNE A LWIp EVMiE M1NhlIIp aIaTAOE N M LWIr A AIIN[L [OIMNIr DANAO[a M tWits!"C Ip A NaTA W 1!&$2 R[.T, tMS NN ILaaV10.•T, rAauTLa a ANIIII nNEN uTNTr n u NE aN6Y R[90MRC rW 4AN OANAti L DEDICATE TO 1,04113 WTWCOMII MOST NOINOTRNRE AMMAMK W— M SUCCESSORS W ASNWS 1, nACT'N' q PNVAR RWD RWr-oI-PNT (R-O- SIN.[Cr m M fARYpn INOCRD OF —A a"a°"":�".'ttw D"'a`a"° '" 1[1 NN D.II. BOOR 1 M PIINN �OINa a CWGI LOCATION MAP Qv.W- LL. 0.L� AL)) NM MPOIDLIITY NANR1Wm[. RONOTAY 1111i0IEa NIL NOT TA l m PAV 1 —1 WMM.q ME L/ML 9K'" AND CMItY, ROIPOA M SAY[ A p A ONEAIM ONEM ERKAY M�MKE N07 TO SCALE PAMNNNMW "aOF �'S DUN NWBaAB1NLr�ANN M Mo W AOU a" m M LGT M= A mOW W'eNw rcEF T1NOm1 A E TACTe W.W. NN •I' M OPEN SP= FOR EANDSCAPNO. /IDOIDOIOI000 NWL MORTEN NOES Am EINNwmIT PUPPODN. LNMY m M Glppn AS DEKKO MMON TOM OENI11L A OS OF FIANCE`, NNMBlO M A [JINN W 81" IGF At A DGMq W TNE'Ia]IL, IOC A'TTS110E 0' W.A IGT m M END OF IRDoaNTATY M NAmDIAME SAD Q0rA4 SEEM 001 kTSRnb/t ALNN up EDIT L-0 ME nn SWNNUAI m �pTAj1ADoEE APPROVALS a NACf 'L' .. I.INC ION DIAFIA'E AID SINK MM NNIAOORNT P11INOtT aMJLCt m fAmm PW ,L NDTEA1Rp� IN W A PMORI! dl M LAINmIn OmC ND 1IDRON RM Al"UNNIM FOR YANRAANa W00031NLY 14047-o/-1MY LINE OF U.S. NNMAY 41 (FANNY TNN% Wpm LAND X-em A nAOf Y AS OPEN VAN PAMT m A NAPCATIONA. AND DMNAM IASEM T ') q MIIW NM =1 1 me !AN ]OUMNE , am"' -AY LINE W NL NNMAY a (YNMY NN A NTTANR W'w NLT m ap Fur Nq TFOI MMnLT sW COMINIW NM OIMRN In. [to oA sn�Um. OGICI[0 INNp NM KDoONlNNItt IW YAWIOIAMR. A M M Nt[ W NOOIINIYN Co1TAM10 ft M[4L WRE W IEiI L FACT •O• AN A Comm A1[A ION — AAII PUIIPO.Tm RM NESPWToAIT IW NANRMMA. L AL DNANAR EANYATS (L[.) AN ow w wEvm NM Ma'OFmN1FY — —DONNE, _ '/�t•)/te•�.0 t. Al ARIA LASNmITS (AL) AS WPCIO NORpI INTN MDoOIIlWrc M YMNIIAAIC[. .1'[ A 1 •. N. SIN L ALL NENDAWN [AMENTS (ME) AS OUWM MEW RM NIDoVM1Te11T INN NNIIT'NASCL I.0 a ALL LAM WN1p/ANR EAN101R1n ,v.E) AN OFIICRO INDRW RM R[DoAILNEIrc AR YAMINIMCE. e1RA1rANN ­MS 111E PLAT A9110Yp eT M OICNIQNM RIINCG ODoM W COUNR COtlMrc, MOITDA Aq DAr s[0D 10. ML EIJImCNE ellrr[R [ASEM. L�Lat) AS oLPICRD NEMW FOR ME PU POt Do NNAGTNI AND WMIMAM OF L,111tlsCAlMO, rENONA NNEBAINt AND 1pAL NM MTPOUNNOU" FOR YANIOIAEICL 1 9 6TM It. A e T PRYAY IPM. GIELENT O,OI ALL LOTS AND INK" 4 E AND A M RMD1W/ SAMIITWYY K00. X j;t=R OTUMx NM RLDoNL1oU Idl R ATM' Mw ATmUC/ rc EN L RLo1Y m NANt' NNDROWOA01 IIAOIIl, W. A MONNA RRPWATINL In 9ucRTARf W 5 TA MT FPANL'D Nr M (0UNV ATSIDENRY TN%J" DAYOF yL•••••• OF Noe. AEEIW9 - ' I. MMT •I' q A C01M01 MG IW MSWr InRi wlvoax E IM(r V •N' M Y q A CNAW AKA FOR AgIEADW IAOEM PYRIpIEE PENN ALSIRMDM(Y !W YNIINIANC[ RNNOT TO M EASEMID O — INIILOIL w1Nrc cewmW AAsrAM Cauxtt A Y '" � � ,� W M mAm I MIT 7 PW NNNIENMR NN ITWANE WIVOtN fATJECT TO M GNEY" OGIOTED MEW RM M PONW N,rc FOR YANtpANEE. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT N>< 900�,,,D�D"^A'• a� �M NAR Do LIS3[ O[YM (IIMT tatlr OI CRLGMCOMfrMNtlmA A TSACT'O q WNN DoALa /NJ[OT N A MMGTOIIAL AM oMNANE [A1NmIT MUM WI M MEW YM NO NDoW aW FON NNNIENAMI, AN M 11NA AT ON M COIMrc OF fill'� ATRSTO) IT, BW`RD.� ODUNTY CllNM OIOn m"' OOWs NY AOJOIpD LOT DOWN. SON N a A t t'IR[ A _'IA'L GY '"'i`�' W MOpA ton a�to txn m t slNlm ON MN r IRA pL{' NRB1 w t W iT il'm.• L r. • — JM� .r tNiY T�" NAMts NOTpICOAM RESDAT, MO A `/ilKi/ M A NLNNA�IIRI en N �� .G��r�iYAhlO4 q �AOAH • .... �... 4� k;Fjr •`e • I MMM MTPY TMT TIA PUT NM eel W1M0 N p AIIO MITI N EWY AM RETAARYOIn a pM1N1 1 AAVp. I NtIM aRN�ynAT tcaN At A�vttL_ MrcMO a Rr0O r/Mi.Af /kWuA) /gDPNI • AEa AIB�I'km LBRL —Trod' P` +,Ar IANR ([RAIm ! . ! aa�ar M RUNFD�i v oauu muML IEwT MMA•)K,'�r'„H ,p 29®!WAA-4 ;• O.i:: MIMRe N.WL aAft. t. ,•�... .. ... PLAT BOOK Lfq PAGE SHEET 1 of 8 R110AOfO IANSTOENSOSp�tIN AIID TNL N NO�ANRf� R NMNANIp M pRIDYDI MIaNa Ix TA F OF NUR NOf fa9t0 M ISM PIAi IINi YAT %[ M N AKE PAIN G pWn NOTES AL DYENWN AR N MY "SEEMED T ERECT. RANG! OTMWSt NONS, ALL CM1d AM TANNENIIAL MO ON—R ■ NgCARf FOUND PtMIAMI MFpEM MANI IL 4W OWWER NWYNENT D INNCARS CIAPTW I�ILANENT OMA NTTERIM M NW�I NET N A(CORONRL NM D N WAM PORNANINT OWNSOL IpR.(aCPJ • NNp1 M POSITS M NN.SOCNK POSTS DI MFOATIAL, POSTE OF TNNOICT, POINTS OF WNIOIIIO OA ATAIF W PONTS OF REVERSE NNMTN[. AL IIEIMTED Attie GS//pT CUa NRCAiA COWS Uww EAN]ApT 0.0 TOADS® oRYAO[ EAIQmIT P01 AAADARt ICUN COMER NWUNINT nl NDGTEE FOUND'1ON Am WL INNATED IITOA1W GtYpT E.LL WDrATG 1ADa0APE SUFFER EArOIOYf LaL INICARS EAR NINTFNAM GSNENT Na INICAM NN1-IIENAL Pm PmG10 PpR Nor IEr PN.L NNCA1tl KEPUN: UNET'[ EANEIIDR P-O-R NWA— --- Dom NDNARt NEr Px NAL Aw NA V l7'2 RT NNCARS •11T20 NWNMN, AL LAYAWNT MPG TO NATIONAL a[WEW YpTWI OATH MLYA). W IM MASON DIWN HQN W AlI SAND W A OND OEAMY OF LON42'35'R W M [AST IMF DI SMN L MKINION am PNIN NET ADOTOI MAmTRN m M MAT 111DIaT q PLWA[D N M, DOW L PAN 41 OF M — MEANS OF 00.UW (were, `LWOA ...0 WL AID NDIENAAW a MRm DECEDENT O"NM R[OONE 'OW .jYi PMES IF TOO, OF M NmN MWmE OT WLLp MA .. ATM INN OT IEITNM MS IROFIRtt NU IMAaa N FLOm Ina AL RM A BAY i10w NEYAImI A D NAN6 Do 1'I' (LS MArA NY IfY} q ROp SIT IAGA. CONNENDW PANEL NNmNNRDT 120410 M114 )OAREAD.O wIF'INAIIW . N AL O.'SEATTWW[ ADDS rumN wmADNprr arFLE Id1 CINNpr FDD NON[ alOWTON PNWORO FIIWIw PAMNOIT RAYATON OF MI WANE RAM FN l DID FEET L0.YD. TO LN NAY.0. PON M'IAmP% WM'Y AND WANADE PUMP MGAM0. W NAE NONTq, INC. WA'AN T IM. 44K MU06 0/07. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE 1 Mary CERMY TAT M ATVUPaD MT W RAPID NOINTTAW MSORT, A MAT O1 A FOnW Or PLOW V. MOTAM CI EN PM1y'ET 1m%AS MOWNET N Mt m L ARTiAPMirc5 4rEg1loNA q ION NWil uiNIANNAIn NNKY OFT INOOM OPODE fYMME a"a my NNW 1N1DN1 N�rppLLDpwW q P11ANnm, IN(LPNpNpMTW N e I[-P• nDNw MUD, ILL MARE NWmmIIMa w OwRl1iTNI�RNi 1,AN "' 7T NnUI Y MTA PpYNI[NT lEAOKt E101F.elpn NLL NE NE, 1YI01 m M RCW% t TM MAT MA�'cGT WT CO �ON11m u TI AND NMI OWDEla NA NET PRLI SOA FM NR[ UONRL M 0,AIN SATE W A,rND I ANON RNIP[N ED 1M Mm•aE D neel. Id'. i�PAAiPV MNIq L Pam. cm MAR OI M1PmA �eA� THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY �✓�asN[:r�/i. THOMAS M. MURPHY, P.S.M. #5828 ;: l tVa1 �{ j nw .FLU.34110 +� ;P am 204-2000 ./.Tf. HOLE MOW FlDNde CINNNAsOf LN!NI. RAIOD•...;•r„n AITUNTIAtlm Nn.1772 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RE5,0VT A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF BLOCK V, HENDERSON CREEK PARK 1ST ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, AT PACE 41 AND LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA K E Y M A P N Rmw� SHEET 3y/ SHEET 4 Z/ 114 OR. ]RRR, QR. N; Lam- PR. J!1) I6 JS SOND£RNEN DRIVE (W R-O-RR HEET 5 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY THOMAS M. MURPHY, P.S.M.5828 sm FV7L7 HRMO .FL. FL. 3-20M HOLE MdMM�ONTES F1CRpRay of Rcws'RwRr'Rwa'°° AWalhMkn No.1771 uRnw ROIIIflR [WILL 16 NIW 7MYR !/ NAPLES MOTOICOA H RESORT A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF BLOCK -L', HENDERSON CREEK PARK 1ST ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PUT BOOK B. AT PAGE 41 AND LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA N UAAP"IC WAM 12' tat. a gw23 148 r 14 12' 146 121• 145 612.1 II 144 12, 143 128 1 I 142 129 y 141 130 �� 140 131 ril 139 132 38 c 153 137 134 • "'t,i 136 135 --------- -- ---- — 48 49 50 �% ; 5��53, TRACT "J" faearAaall tk IS-. "ware=uool ._.__...._._._ _........... .......—._..__ ________-"_.____ H' N e9'1555' W 515.1Y soup 1 O.A. Mwvcu.'e�l e1 FroWa47=3 .1a2— I ra—w /tam reaoee van / Mx/snoaor va1 Oa. 1•] t P0. lev] ��tt:l•�r �c•.i�:t.r: �te:� uznl[:>.�la1i• t9F � ■fi.Cis'E it;ii 5�3 i��[: F: kf 40 S�L£:i• t� 1rF it � M'1�t�A;'�sI}4IY:ll i1211� ``itl�l Lii Y'•]i�'3L1�[['Yf l; 76Jt71[e� fi[7E'L it.i:1i�1:L";•EL'[:[lli:/��IEP� tar ■E�r it k>��tei� ectl•sr�Eusi• •.;.-■iFL•i �firF�itx7l��:f:-s•:fL7svIL= TRACT "J* 1THISMINSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY 1 1 NA LE5 MOTOREOACH R.E5O' RT A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF BLOCK V. HENDERSON CREEK PARK 1ST ADDITION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, AT PACE 41 AND LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 3. TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA N Noma AAIpW �� TRACT "0" 1� 1T N [ubt�--:-• w4 v TRIA�CTT "F:a c 154 NA ,T ► TIinii "m�ro !wa "ry'r y. Jo �•7 h" TRACT "F" DETAIL 'C' "o, m mrc TRACT "F" .�mTiBlwu THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY THOMAS M. U-. MURPHY, P.S.M. #8828 No Enw"Wy to FL 11110 HOLE MONTEB Ph": M 2a•-2000 FbM"CwWrabd MV" W "m NM112 MUM Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUC Disclosure of Interest Informatioi' 2. If applicant is corporation other than a public corporation, so indicate and name officers and major stockholders below. Owner Percentage of Ownership Naples RV Resort LLC 100% P.O. Box 9025 La Jolla CA 92038 Officers and maior stockholders Percentage of Ownership Paydar Properties, Inc., Manager 50% P.O. Box 9025 La Jolla CA 92038 Officers and maior stockholders Percentage of Ownership Reza Paydar, its President 100% RV Acquisitions LLC, Manager 50% P.O. Box 9025 • La Jolla CA 92038 Officers and maior stockholders Percentage of Ownership Bagri Family Trust 16.67% James T Waring Money Purchase Pension Plan 33.32% KCJ Partnership 16.68%. Sandeep Bagri 16.66% Angela Bagri 16.67% •Page 1 of 1 AFFIDAVIT OF AUTHORIZATION FOR PETITION NUMBERS(S) PLwiw oowo 1, Rot. ftydw (print name), as ,M-sw (title, if apPlicable) of Ry AN-bwms u.c aw Ong Membw of N*OU Ry RomM LLc (company, if a icabte), swear or affirm under oath, that t am the (choose one) ownerQ applicant contract purchaser and that: 1, I have full authority to secure the approval(s) requested and to impose covenants and restrictions on the referenced property as a result of any action approved by the County in accordance with this application and the Land Development Code; 2. Allanswersto the questions in this application and any sketches, data or other supplementary matter attached hereto and made a part of this application are honest and true; 3. 1 have authorized the staff of Collier County to enter upon the property during normal working hours for the purpose of investigating and evaluating the request made through this application; and that 4. The property will be transferred, conveyed, sold or subdivided subject to the conditions and restrictions imposed by the approved action. 5. Well authorize Q. c" Mk--WAssoc*", P.A. to act as ourlmy representative in any matters regarding this petition including 1 through 2 above. 'Notes; • If the applicant is a corporation, then if is usually executed by the corp. Ares. or v. press • ff the applicant is a Limited. Liability Company (LL.C.) or Limited Company (L.C.), then the documents should typically be signed by the Companys 'Managing Member. . If the applicant is a partnership, then typically a partner can sign on behalf of the partnership. if the applicant is a limited partnership, then the general partner must sign and be identified as the 'general partner' of the named partnership. • if the applicant is a trust, then they must include the trustee's name and the words 'as trustee" • In each instance, brat determine the applicant's status, e.g., individual, corporate, trust,_ partnership, and then use the appropriate format for that ownership. Under penalties of penury, 1 declare that 1 have read the foregoing Affidavit of Authorization and that the facts stated in it are true. Datd STATE OF FtMDA w r*p l rt COUNTY OF GOBJER ahN P166O The foregoing instrument was swom to (or affirmed) and subscribed before me on IS (date) by lui.h YA`1DR@, (name of person providing oath or affirmation), as who is personally known to me or who harprod — 6e!�� sru+lPlseu Signature of tary Pub c WAELA WOM tloasnMtisa @614Tq NoWY P ONo . cavo nis z so t1MYs t7oaMy ; MY COrrNa 17, 21~? CPW&CnA-601151155 REV 3/w14 M AILA 11101110 OWMMl N it =W46 NNE l POW 00ftw t t1M q1N an* t�1rM�1. tubgAmr is • COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.colliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 0 u: ADD11�@�1���HECiCLtST � � 4. Please complete the following and email to GMDAddressing@colliergov.net or fax to the Operations Department at 239-252-5724 or submit in person to the_Addressing Department at the above address. Form must be signed by Addressina personnel prior to pre -application meeting Please allow 3 days for processing. Not all items will apply to every project. Items in bold type are required. FOLIO NUMBERS MUST BE PROVIDED. Forms older than 6 months will require additional review and approval by the Addressing Department. PETITION TYPE (Indicate type below, complete a separate Addressing Checklist for each Petition type) ❑ BL (Blasting Permit) ❑ SDP (Site Development Plan) ❑ BD (Boat Dock Extension) ❑ SDPA (SDP Amendment) ❑ Carnival/Circus Permit ❑ SDPI (Insubstantial Change to SDP) ❑ CU (Conditional Use) ❑ SIP (Site Improvement Plan) ❑ EXP (Excavation Permit) ❑ SIPI (Insubstantial Change to SIP) ❑ FP (Final Plat ❑ SNR (Street Name Change) ❑ LLA (Lot Line Adjustment) ❑ SNC (Street Name Change — Unplatted) ❑ PNC (Project Name Change) ❑ TDR (Transfer of Development Rights) ❑ PPL (Plans & Plat Review) ❑ VA (Variance) ❑ PSP (Preliminary Subdivision Plat) ❑ VRP (Vegetation Removal Permit) • ❑ PUD Rezone ❑ VRSFP (Vegetation Removal & Site Fill Permit) ❑ RZ (Standard Rezone) Q OTHER PDI - Insubstantial Change to PUD LEGAL DESCRIPTION of subject property or properties (copy of lengthy description may be attached) NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT - Plat Book 49 Pages 35 - 40 FOLIO (Property ID) NUMBER(s) of above (attach to, or associate with, legal description if more than one) See attached property list. STREET ADDRESS or ADDRESSES (as applicable, if already assigned) Trout Lane • LOCATION MAP must be attached showing exact location of project/site in relation to nearest public road right- of-way • SURVEY (copy - needed only for unplatted properties) PROPOSED PROJECT NAME (if applicable) Currently "Naples Motorcoach Resort" PROPOSED STREET NAMES (if applicable) SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN NUMBER (for existing projects/sites only) • SDP= or AR or PL # PL20150000660 5 '" COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION www.colliergov.net 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE • NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 (239) 252-2400 FAX (239) 252-5724 Project or development names proposed for, or already appearing in, condominium documents (if application; indicate whether proposed or existing) Naples Motorcoach Resort Please Return Approved Checklist By: g Email ❑ Fax ❑ Personally picked up Applicant Name: Sharon Umpenhour Phone:239.947.1144 Email/Fax: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Signature on Addressing Checklist does not constitute Project and/or Street Name approval and is subject to further review by the Operations Department. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Folio Number See attached Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Folio Number Approved by: Updated by: Date: -2015 • IF OLDER THAN 6 MONTHS, FORM MUST BE UPDATED OR NEW FORM SUBMITTED F zo x E A Rugg DEDICATION S/RESERVATIONS W.AkM R YMN Ila f*Ors NY01�"Woa 0AM' OGt�.V.G: i��1FalM NYpi9� lamli NMAr14 i"4 M MirtU Nola MYT,n MT.m11ih Prr 'taw— fMliMff /�} Al V Mq mew MN No ou'o—th'm r. atarAa M CRAWA 0104" v A%*4tK t 4400 tvNllAvotelyfWNMl �lyvv��trM NM/vRPW105L� M{� 4' -fMIWN A M4P NM11p� HMv�MWyK�Mf�YbpA�OpgMAg4piNl MpM�fIpAM 1ECpM#�iPNy9�yR�lN[ �if�Y�OA��fM MMNIYMR.c11Map AP�[A�itte lM,W1'NiIfPN/A/4.1M N. MIT ifr� rq.wii uv r aONMf .NI:Io�if YM1Er4EtaT Irot IIei�MilMrt6 /useaM}oM, f111t.rYigo<ptOrj pt fY{f0�'A�I(f6 y��swSC�ia yrwM�wffya-reia iAr s wrc Trrwgwyafo +wee jzaivij � M !. }ajtgY'ltl =uWRN Mlti 1 Wo b x as py IW� A\I aMIMT vv1fA yv}�J1�1f 11r1f"Ifo ollollt • ♦lRyyypfNllN.iAR1yY�P�ah�l�lflNyyARINMMaaIY fYI IrI�+lQ . N,MMr N�MMArt fITN xfU { IiI1A 00 M.. sow" 4W M a fb,NxfoIWI aM�191k10eM►fr►w/rM!�WiY Itl!:. .� awMawwswlwlMW.prirwMrrNNrMRIt�rrisNrrrwrc x'1a _A to ormwnlMinYyon /M IISommu Y [YMtrwNwitrt, 1'�N ilR,(,j K "rRrN TMMrI R7VfAMlr? M �MM�ApRo fMtlpto Q,ra} M .OPh'�t�aclt�6^s1,11p1W�vU1M Mf0'EIMr1i'I /tlk IR �L ��M""'^70L1Mv1U �Mb�. IXa �fMaTMT � ataa a� r:�w �r�at w. �+tra R NLTK W Nkf.YaGMiMW 11pp,L Aq. A a"MA7A ip►OMtvlt OI{"YOM�t! M 1,.R/g17'M'AorMM1.A"fxT'lt aPlMITT r'TfCa aIMMa4 •• �MMf CFI a N �(�yTMWM flA J OYIMp ram) **I " �W.oPM 1vM1�fO vM11B4MEf MMt" fVNMMT M L[ tARYNtf owaft A 111H Y M�r rrM fPt[ lOrrOi q 4 141vtM"al�ML ,Tr MAaA1[ M � NMRltr,v�l O vD IMMMINNII'/ i'Mr vTARr11N. W Rr-M Mum Mttva, N INRM IAi IAq,A a GVI1W rTTae R ! aaNy rT rea "Am" T""rTL P16 isT AtidTlNt, At RECORM IH RIAY WQ 41, AT ,IT $1 SOUTH, RANGE 1$ EAST. COLLIER COUHT1r. F1;pp o. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION ACKNOWLEDGEMENT sum a CWTfN— .WTi% of 14 ! ElNK bojy* A— NV IIMIQ I/rAAINN[ M R �pMq��/�p147` apipy pf7fply �pfw �Q�TIlMMf - W IIR! MfNRat /tyyl�M�v11Y N�.IfO VA !Mt Mf W tW An K Afts NMta. rtM47r • MVM�1 ML-IMAM w OMONv1A1. MY fypMNL • WWWOM" POW~ rrarrtf .&MWL 4W aeaxnr OWMW Q =1 r�ifxfw A"MrNMAR rM -A swoon aMrMao c00%oa f.OK"4 WMgp p of Mafl�fz t. iL fNTUttf ARM1N001_R' 6U:L MMANs orMn llWIf WAMp,T ♦L f11rL`AIRt OMfN101RTGTr aw summs romm:ompus r7rRort ti sr.eRu a�M lr!Niir sire riptiN iirti�ilei ,.0 irietlU uUloMPt MINT! tx11MRR iwt +IlRtir t,M:rrmeosrAern ' Iu il11TToitt1011.t116Tt TM NWA" p" NT ott -rMi r11Rairft"gpTR fA�Mslf *." . I '1IWI-10-1mv orT "eletiu *fal MR xom ar it em M MTextTA 9N = M}Mpt AM.MM coo" I" skokeft" Nr Mf %a Ital TMM tl01MURS rIN t]l".Irt Ott, abyA M1rT4- ROb10v1 IFF 4%Ml Mq Q� o "pAIA nN v w jff.•,a A ritrrrrlr ltrYm AA( AIMCrM n sV. aWM W"a -XNa" OtUt)f Altaa[Y ooittw eTrTTrT L Nf EaMTv ArNMY uN .---4jL—.. w w 4 T�PUT 0 �"eurtTr�wull*R••ar�N N "r rwr �s ��z f' K a�r— Aagrl xV t rv,lr� "MrafYerrT6ltM"ro . v �r°r�auri `w"`i n --Mew rawest M u r vw�'�aa w ifw aAr rM+ w e�C awk n jTNrik7�' or�irt`�".trt fIVYM fMAMY /MNfR,r alM79F{ s tP1NRrR RNR /���11 EA iRT AAY4 10 . rMNTi a.."mt � 'Mr tr"rAta_rbyTc T'M'M!o N Nxt TfratL. lYRYEYq!'$._OERTIFIOi1tL IT �RrNf fuL M�tA'e IMpA� *is �O�Ny)IMt,I,1MfYW AMRAf4 � WE At a r. Y7 �( W�N{aOMIMI�7rIpfMatfltl' �IM1aL0t[• � " MfB I#��rAivfi MMt S!W Rt R ( q iMMl1N aAf ratr xNrA �f AurllRMrrT "NOMM to.1/7if Mfi'i�o �,_ _�ffSW1TY THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY 7mMAS M. MURPHY, P. MNrP UMMW Mp'rMa IUt r,f R1r n Y[ M17 rtMT N arf rio w"af a 4 °a�P�MgM�^"'vTtsR' m"""" 0S.M. #3523 >,,,n ' NOLR MtAVT@8 PhM` i zi" y AM.oeu4"ARo.wao .. Q. T i!C. 1. + .�rj' .r rrlpoM�T e.Mat, Mn,fiNrev Ne.nt�. ParcellD Namel StreetNumber FullStreet 62380000027 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13309 TROUT LN 62380000043 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC • 62380000069 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 62380000085 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13363 SNOOK CIR 62380000108 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 62380000124 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13323 TROUT LN 62380000140 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13650 SNOOK CIR 62380000166 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13599 SNOOK CIR 62380000182 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13543 SNOOK CIR 62380000205 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13519 SNOOK CIR 62380000221 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 62380000247 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13330 TROUT LN 62380000263 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13303 SNOOK CIR 62380000289 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13307 SNOOK CIR 62380000302 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13311 SNOOK CIR 62380000328 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13315 SNOOK CIR 62380000344 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13319 SNOOK CIR 62380000360 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13323 SNOOK CIR 62380000386 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13327 SNOOK CIR 62380000409 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13331 SNOOK CIR 62380000425 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13335 SNOOK CIR 62380000441 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13339 SNOOK CIR 62380000467 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13343 SNOOK CIR 62380000483 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13347 SNOOK CIR • 62380000506 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13351 SNOOK CIR 62380000548 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13359 SNOOK CIR 62380000564 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13367 SNOOK CIR 62380000580 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13371 SNOOK CIR 62380000603 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13375 SNOOK CIR 62380000629 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13379 SNOOK CIR 62380000645 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13383 SNOOK CIR 62380000661 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13387 SNOOK CIR 62380000687 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13391 SNOOK CIR 62380000700 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13395 SNOOK CIR 62380000726 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13399 SNOOK CIR 62380000742 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13403 SNOOK CIR 62380000807 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13415 SNOOK CIR 62380000849 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13423 SNOOK CIR 62380000865 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 14327 SNOOK CIR 62380000881 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13431 SNOOK CIR 62380000904 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13435 SNOOK CIR 62380000920 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13439 SNOOK CIR 62380000946 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13443 SNOOK CIR 62380000962 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13447 SNOOK CIR 62380000988 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13451 SNOOK CIR 62380001000 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13455 SNOOK CIR • 11 62380001026 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13459 SNOOK CIR NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13463 SNOOK CIR •62380001042 62380001068 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13467 SNOOK CIR 62380001165 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13487 SNOOK CIR 62380001181 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13491 SNOOK CIR 62380001204 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13495 SNOOK CIR 62380001220 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13499 SNOOK CIR 62380001246 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13503 SNOOK CIR 62380001262 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13507 SNOOK CIR 62380001288 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13511 SNOOK CIR 62380001327 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13547 SNOOK CIR 62380001343 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13551 SNOOK CIR 62380001369 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13555 SNOOK CIR 62380001385 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13559 SNOOK CIR 62380001408 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13563 SNOOK CIR 62380001424 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13567 SNOOK CIR 62380001440 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13571 SNOOK CIR 62380001466 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13575 SNOOK CIR 62380001482 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13579 SNOOK CIR 62380001505 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13583 SNOOK CIR 62380001521 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13587 SNOOK CIR 62380001547 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13591 SNOOK CIR 62380001563 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13595 SNOOK CIR NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13607 SNOOK CIR .62380001589 62380001602 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13611 SNOOK CIR 62380001628 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13615 SNOOK CIR 62380001644 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13619 SNOOK CIR 62380001660 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13623 SNOOK CIR 62380001686 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13627 SNOOK CIR 62380001709 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13631 SNOOK CIR 62380001725 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13635 SNOOK CIR 62380001741 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13639 SNOOK CIR 62380001864 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13588 SNOOK CIR 62380001880 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13584 SNOOK CIR 62380001903 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13580 SNOOK CIR 62380001929 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13576 SNOOK CIR 62380002025 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13556 SNOOK CIR 62380002041 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13552 SNOOK CIR 62380002067 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13548 SNOOK CIR 62380002083 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13544 SNOOK CIR 62380002106 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13540 SNOOK CIR 62380002122 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13536 SNOOK CIR 62380002148 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13530 SNOOK CIR 62380002164 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13526 SNOOK CIR 62380002180 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13542 SNAPPER LN NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13546 SNAPPER LN •62380002203 62380002229 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13550 SNAPPER LN 62380002245 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13554 SNAPPER LN 62380002261 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13558 SNAPPER LN 62380002287 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13562 SNAPPER LN 62380002300 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13566 SNAPPER LN 62380002326 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13570 SNAPPER LN 62380002342 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13574 SNAPPER LN 62380002368 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13578 SNAPPER LN 62380002407 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13586 SNAPPER LN 62380002423 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13590 SNAPPER LN 62380002449 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13594 SNAPPER LN 62380002465 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13598 SNAPPER LN 62380002481 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13602 SNAPPER LN 62380002520 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13636 SNOOK CIR 62380002546 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13629 SNAPPER LN 62380002562 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13625 SNAPPER LN 62380002588 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13621 SNAPPER LN 62380002601 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13617 SNAPPER LN 62380002627 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13613 SNAPPER LN 62380002643 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13609 SNAPPER LN 62380002669 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13605 SNAPPER LN 62380002685 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13601 SNAPPER LN 62380002708 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13597 SNAPPER LN 62380002724 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13593 SNAPPER LN 62380002740 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13589 SNAPPER LN • 62380002766 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13585 SNAPPER LN 62380002782 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13581 SNAPPER LN 62380002805 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13577 SNAPPER LN 62380002821 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13573 SNAPPER LN 62380002847 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13569 SNAPPER LN 62380002863 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13565 SNAPPER LN 62380002889 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13S61 SNAPPER LN 62380002902 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13557 SNAPPER LN 62380002960 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13490 SNOOK CIR 62380002986 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13486 LADYFISH LN 62380003008 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13482 LADYFISH LN 62380003024 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13478 LADYFISH LN 62380003040 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13474 LADYFISH LN 62380003082 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13466 LADYFISH LN 62380003105 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13462 LADYFISH LN 62380003121 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13458 LADYFISH LN 62380003202 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13442 LADYFISH LN 62380003309 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13422 LADYFISH LN 62380003325 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13418 LADYFISH LN 62380003341 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13642 SNOOK CIR 62380003383 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13449 LADYFISH LN 62380003406 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13453 LADYFISH LN • 62380003422 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13457 LADYFISH LN 62380003448 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13461 LADYFISH LN NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13465 LADYFISH LN •62380003464 62380003480 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13469 LADYFISH LN 62380003503 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13473 LADYFISH LN 62380003529 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13477 LADYFISH LN 6238000354E NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13481 LADYFISH LN 62380003587 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13472 SNOOK CIR 62380003600 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13468 SNOOK CIR 62380003626 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13464 SNOOK CIR 62380003642 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13460 SNOOK CIR 62380003668 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13456 SNOOK CIR 62380003684 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13448 SNOOK CIR 62380003707 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13440 SNOOK CIR 62380003723 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13430 SNOOK CIR 62380003749 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13420 SNOOK CIR 62380003804 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13398 SNOOK CIR 62380003820 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13394 SNOOK CIR 62380003846 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13390 SNOOK CIR 62380003862 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13386 SNOOK CIR 62380003888 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13382 SNOOK CIR 62380003901 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13378 SNOOK CIR 62380003927 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC 13374 SNOOK CIR Ll • Coilier County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 2800 NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.collieraov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 Pre -Application Meeting and Final Submittal Requirement Checklist for: PUD Insubstantial Change Chapter 3 G.3 of the Administrative Code The following Submittal Requirement checklist is to be utilized during the Pre -Application Meeting and at time of application submittal. At final submittal, the checklist is to be completed and submitted with the application packet. Please provide the submittal items in the exact order listed below, with cover sheets attached to each section. Inemmnipta euhmittAC will nn* ha =Kan*va REQUIREMENTS FOR REVIEW COPIES REQUIRE NOT REQUIRE Completed Application (download current form from County website) 16 Pre -Application Meeting notes 1 Project Narrative, including a detailed description of proposed changes and why amendment is necessary 16 Detail of request Current Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy Revised Master Plan & 1 Reduced Copy Revised Text and any exhibits PUD document with changes crossed through & underlined PUD document as revised with amended Title Page with Ordinance # Warranty Deed Legal Description on Boundary survey, if boundary of original PUD is amended ggg� If PUD is platted, include plat book pages List identifying Owner & all parties of corporation 2 Affidavit of Authorization, silzned & notarized 2 El Completed Addressins Checklist 1 Copy of 8 Y in. x 11 in. graphic location map of site 1 Electronic copy of all documents and plans *Please advise: The Office of the Hearing Examiner requires all materials to be submitted electronically in PDF format. 91 [] *If located in Immokalee or seeking affordable housing, include an additional set of each submittal requirement. AUU1 11UNAL MQUIKtNltN 15 1-UK I HE PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS: • Following the completion of the review process by County Review staff, the applicant shall submit all materials electronically to the designated project manager. • Please contact the project manager to confirm the number of additional copies required. 9/25/2014 Page 3 of 4 • • 0 Co*er County COLLIER COUNTY GOVERNMENT 28DO NORTH HORSESHOE DRIVE GROWTH MANAGEMENT DIVISION NAPLES, FLORIDA 34104 www.coiliergov.net (239) 252-2400 FAX: (239) 252-6358 PLANNERS — INDICATE IF THE PETITION NEEDS TO BE ROUTED TO THE FOLLOWING REVIEWERS: School District (Residential Components): Amy Lockheart ❑ Sayshore/Gateway Triangle Redevelopment: Executive Director Utilities En ineering: Kris Van Lengen Parks and Recreation: Vicky Ahmad Emergency Management: Dan Summers Naples Airport Authority: Ted Solida FFFConservancy of SWFL: Nichole Ryan Other: City of Naples: Robin Singer, Planning Director Other: FEE REQUIREMENTS PUD Amendment insubstantial (PDI): $1,500.00 Pre -Application Meeting: $500.00 Estimated Legal Advertising fee for the Office of the Hearing Examiner: $925.00 The completed application, all required submittal materials, and fees shall be submitted to: Growth Management Division/Planning and Regulation • ATTN: Business Center 2800 North Horseshoe Drive Naples, FL 34104 Applicant/Owner Signature Date Applicant/Owner Name (please print) • 9/25/2014 Page 4 of 4 Cofr County 0 Pre -Application Meeting Sign -in Sheet Collier County Contact Information: Name Review Discipline Phone Email ❑ Richard Anderson Environmental Review 252-2483 richardanderson@colliergov.net ❑ David Anthony Environmental Review 252-2497 davidanthony@colliergov.net ❑ Summer Araque Environmental Review 2S2-6290 summerbrownaraque@colliergov.net ❑ Steve Baluch Transportation Planning 252-2361 5t henBaluch@colliergov.net ❑ Madelin Bunster Architectural Review 252-8523 madelinbunster@colliergov.net ❑ Mark Burtchin ROW Permitting 252-5165 markburtchin@colliergov.net ❑ George Cascio Utility Billing 252-5543 georgecascio@colliergov.net ❑ Heidi Ashton Cicko Managing Asst. County Attorney 252-8773 heidiashton@colliergov.net Sue Faulkner Comprehensive Planning 252-5715 suefaulkner@colliergov.net Eric Fey, P.E. Utility Plan Review 252-2434 ericfey@colliergov.net ❑ Paula Fleishman Impact Fee Administration 252-2924 paulafleishman@colliergov.net ❑ Michael Gibbons Structural/Residential Plan Review 252-2426 michaelgibbons@colliergov.net ❑ Nancy Gundlach, AICP, PLA Zoning Services 252-2484 nancygundiach@colliergov.net ❑ Shar Hin son East Naples Fire District 687-5650 shingson@ccfco.org ❑ John Houldsworth Engineering Services 252-5757 iohnhouldsworth@colliergov.net ❑ Jodi Hughes Transportation Pathways 252-5744 'odihughes@colliergov.net ❑ Alicia Humphries Ri ht-Cf-Way Permitting 252-2326 aliciahumphries@colliergov.net ❑ Marcia Kendall Comprehensive Planning 252-2387 marciakendall@colliergov.net ❑ Reed Jarvi, P.E. Transportation Planning 252-5849 reedjarvi@colliergov.net ❑ Stephen Lenber er Environmental Review 252-2915 stevelenberger@colliergov.net ❑ Paulo Martins Utilities 252-4285 paulomartins@colliergov.net ❑ Thomas Mastroberto Fire Safety 252-7348 1 Thomasmastroberto@colliergov.net ❑ Jack McKenna, P.E. Engineering Services 252-2911 'ackmckenna@colliergov.net ❑ Matt McLean, P.E. Principal Project Manager 252-8279 matthewmclean@colliergov.net ❑ Gilbert Moncivaiz Utility impact Fees 252-4215 ilbertmoncivaiz@colliergov.net ❑ Michele Mosca, A1CP Impact Fee Administration 252-2466 michelemosca@colliergov.net ❑ Annis Moxam Addressing 252-5519 1 annismoxam@colliergov.net 0 Mariam Ocheltree Graphics 252-2315 mariamocheltree@colliergov.net ❑ Brandy Otero Transit 252-5859 brandyotero@colIiergov.net ❑ Bill Pancake North Naples Fire District 252-2310 billpancake@colliergov.net ❑ John Podczerwinsky Transportation Planning 252-5890 johnpodczerwinsky@colliergov.net • Rev 411/15 0 • Co er County ❑ Brandi Pollard Utility Impact fees 252-6237 brandipollard@colliergov.net ❑ Fred Reischl, AICP Zoning Services 252-4211 fredreischl@colliergov.net ❑ Brett Rosenblum, P.E. Stormwater Plan Review 252-2905 brettrosenblum@colllergov.net Michael Sawyer Zoning Services 252-2926 michaelsawyer@colliergov.net ❑ Corby Schmidt, AICP Comprehensive Planning 252-2944 corbyschmidt@colliergov.net ❑ Chris Scott, AICP Planning and Zoning 252-2460 chrisscott@colliergov.net ❑ Daniel Smith, AICP Landscape Review 252-4312 danielsmith@colliergov.net ❑ Scott Stone Assistant County Attorney 252-8400 scottstone@colliergov.net ❑ Mark Strain Hearing Examiner/CCPC 252-4446 markstrain@colliergov.net ❑ Carolina Valera Comprehensive Planning 252-8498 carolinavalera@colliergov.net ❑ Kris VanLengen Utility Planning 252-5366 krisvanlengen@colliergov.net ❑ Jon Walsh Building Review 252-2962 jonathanwalsh@colliergov.net ❑ David Weeks, AICP Future Land Use Consistency 252-2306 davidweeks@colliergov.net ❑ Kirsten Wilkie Environmental Review 252-SS18 kirstenwilkie@colliergov.net ❑ Christine Willoughby Planning and Zoning 252-5748 1 ChristneWilloughby@colliergov.net Additional Attendee Contact Information: Name %Representing Phone Email AeuoW vo Rey 4/1/15 . cc) v�*, Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD Insubstantial Change to a PUD Project Narrative and Detail of Request Project Narrative The Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD was approved in 2007 as Ordinance 2007-85. The resort has been platted into 184 motorcoach sites and approximately 30 sites have been sold to date. Improvements include internal roads, stonmwater, buffers/walls, amenity area and storage facilities. The property owner/developer is proposing minor changes to the PUD document which would increase the size of the allowed small utility buildings on each individual lot from 100 square feet to a maximum of 308 square feet. Changes are also proposed to the building setbacks for the utility buildings, which are reflected in the modified development standards table. Additionally the applicant proposes to delete the current exhibit that depicts typical lot details and replace with an exhibit that provides less detail, which will permit more flexibility while maintaining consistency with the approved development standards table. The applicant also proposes to modify the length of residency from 6 months to 9 months. Detail of Request Insubstantial Change Criteria LDC Subsection 10.02.13 E.1 • E. Changes and amendments. There are three types of changes to a PUD Ordinance: Substantial, Insubstantial, and Minor. Language changes to a previously approved PUD document shall require the same procedure as for amending the official zoning atlas, except for the removal of a commitment for payment towards affordable housing which is considered to be a minor change as described in Section 10.02.13 E.3.c. 1. Substantial changes. Any substantial change(s) to an approved PUD Ordinance shall require the review and recommendation of the Planning Commission and approval by the Board of County Commissioners as a PUD amendment prior to implementation. Applicants shall be required to submit and process a new application complete with pertinent supporting data, as set forth in sections 10.02.13 A and B. For the purpose of this section, a substantial change shall be deemed to exist where: a. There is a proposed change in the boundary of the PUD; or N/A b. There is a proposed increase in the total number of dwelling units or intensity of land use or height of buildings within the development; • Revised 04/17/2015 • N/A c. There is a proposed decrease in preservation, conservation, recreation or open space areas within the development not to exceed 5 percent of the total acreage previously designated as such, or 5 acres in area; No net change in preserve, recreation or open space results from this amendment. d. There is a proposed increase in the size of areas used for nonresidential uses, to include institutional, commercial and industrial land uses (excluding preservation, conservation or open spaces), or a proposed relocation of nonresidential land uses; No increase in non-residential uses or areas for non-residential uses are proposed. e. There is a substantial increase in the impacts of the development which may include, but are not limited to, increases in traffic generation; changes in traffic circulation; or impacts on other public facilities; i No additional traffic or public facility impacts will result from the request. f. The change will result in land use activities that generate a higher level of vehicular • traffic based upon the Trip Generation Manual published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers; No new uses are proposed. g. The change will result in a requirement for increased stormwater retention, or will otherwise increase stormwater discharges; Adequate area exists on -site for stormwater retention, and no change to the approved discharge rate is proposed. No additional stormwater retention areas will be required. h. The change will bring about a relationship to an abutting land use that would be incompatible with an adjacent land use; N/A. i. Any modification to the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which is inconsistent with the future land use element or other element of the growth management plan or which modification would increase the density or intensity of the permitted land uses; Revised 04/17/2015 The PUD and proposed changes are consistent with the Collier County • Growth Management Plan. j. The proposed change is to a PUD district designated as a development of regional impact (DRI) and approved pursuant to F.S. § 380.06, where such change requires a determination and public hearing by Collier County pursuant to F.S. § 380.06(19). Any change that meets the criterion of F.S. § 380.06(19)(e)2, and any changes to a DRI/PUD master plan that clearly do not create a substantial deviation shall be reviewed and approved by Collier County under this section 10.02.13 of this Code; or The project is not a DRI. k. Any modification in the PUD master plan or PUD document or amendment to a PUD ordinance which impact(s) any consideration deemed to be a substantial modification as described under this section 10.02.13 The proposed modifications do not meet the standards for a substantial modification and create no external impacts. • • Revised 04/17/2015 • PUo LEGEND -- roan. t lath S Of14f Ar tMM i ♦ v �T ` -` •.rnilrlw wal r�ipyp Iw�rtn a BOAT 870FIA(iE LOCATM MAP J � � r � p s ' Mro' tT�x rcaTra aro a LAND USE SUMMARY �j••'' is root oupm a,s ..! lux !I M 1 fCR DdM1tOH p \. LOT AM t3.7 Aq NAX WlrRxkom/I"T STOMM 0.6 Af! LOX ♦ o f WN i i �� TMLT LIx Nou9El I I 1 � A/CU 0aAfWFM Mtwso urof pmp 1.1 As! .Jx DSST. BOAT Lmr I r ; ; r 0awAGf LAa 1.9 M FAX IA11w FOR USE 0 FUNATIOUL AaW 3.1 "A SAX (Q►AID( Oft-,) ; I � t -J. ♦ ►tlCiWKOIR LANDSCAPEAt"4S A.* Ilr 7DTY 100.1EQ A!U 233 As 700x T OTK 0101 PAQ lTOOwfA K 307E 1p77ay + O / 1 I rr n r II Mwlf i M wry p r a I AC= WTH REMOTE K.w ---- --- ---- � ------ 20 r3rfrrr 1� T----- saor r r001 v U I ; % MOTORCOACH LOTS FO DOOR OM is i i 1WAM 01 3i 00AT W 1 fOR DEV1Al10M !S YATH "I.�pI e ' wT e0 t�1fOmOROATz �• /� �� ___r's+.ram.• ate. ��s-.� '-- � i � r-uw.rrwr pr4pow on 1 1 © r +rwR Meer lafwc M +11sI --W-----------—'------- —------- — .i ♦ (�j 1r.ur�Awww -•---- ~-_ Omma- ~ *me low wra ^• !li TYPICAL 24' W_ TOWAL RAW. ROADWAY XCTM .0 IML 6 afa w1i[ r� w1KM rl7w�4.a r�wRw tlrll NAPI ES MOTORCOACH RESORT, INC. Il.� � C.P.U.D. MASTER PLAN ' `' . w 41P1p 445 -T NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT •• w �w�H.,v j EXHIBIT _ C ♦ •• ZOOS.144 �QlrllT C Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD Amend Ordinance Number 2007-85 EXHIBIT A, PERMITTED USES ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 2007-85, THE NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD, IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: EXHIBIT A NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD ALLOWABLE USES PERMITTED USES: No building or structure, or part thereof, shall be erected, altered or used, or land used, in whole or in part, for other than the following: A. Principal Uses: 1. Class A motorcoach vehicles, as described herein. One (1) Class A motorcoach vehicle per "lot" (assigned parking space). 0 Definition: Motorcoach vehicles shall be defined as those vehicles which have been categorized by the Recreational Vehicle Industry Association of America (RVIA), and the Family Motorcoach Association (FMA), as Class "A" or "Motorcoaches" and/or factory customized bus conversions, that: (a) are mobil, in accordance with the code of standards of the RVIA and FMA; (b) are self- • propelled, and completely self-contained vehicles, which include all the conveniences of a home including, but not limited to cooking, sleeping, shower and bathroom facilities; (c) are structured so that the driver's seat is accessible from the living area in a walking position; (d) contain a minimum interior height of 6 feet in the living areas; (e) have a minimum length of 35 feet, a maximum length of 45 feet and a maximum width of 102 inches plus slide outs; and (f) have a fixed roof, as opposed to the "pop-up" variety. 2. any other use or service which is comparable in nature with the uses set forth herein and is found to be compatible in the district by the Board of Zoning Appeals or Hearing Examiner. B. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses and structures customarily associated with the permitted principal uses and structures, including, but not limited to: 1. Amenities customarily associated with recreational vehicle parks, such as recreation and social facilities (both indoor and outdoor) administration buildings, service/maintenance buildings, bathrooms, laundries and similar services for occupants of the park. Recreation facilities may include but are not limited to swimming pools, tennis courts, boating facilities, playground and clubhouse for indoor recreation. 2. Utility buildings as may be required for the operation or maintenance of the park not to exceed 1000 s.f. • Words underlined are additions; words s#uekshmuegh are deletions Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD, PDI Last Revised 0612212015 Page I of 7 3. Twenty-seven (27) proposed docs. 4. The existing boat ramp. . S. A boat storage facility in the approximate location shown on the CPUD Master Plan, with up to 32 spaces. The actual maximum height of the building shall be 15 feet. • I� 6. Enclosed utility/storage area up to three hundred eight (308) square feet inclusive of all added roofs over entries, except typical roof overhangs. Any utility/storage area may be located adjacent to its associated recreation vehicle in compliance with the setbacks provided in Exhibit B, Development Standards Principal and Accessory Structures, of this document. The utility/storage area may be a continuous part of a screened -in porch where such a porch is attached to the vehicle as herein provided. However, the combined square footage of the enclosed utility/storage area and screened porch shall not exceed 308 square feet. An enclosed utility/storage structure may not be used as a dwelling unit or a guesthouse and it shall not contain a bed or bedroom. The enclosed utility/storage structure shall not be occupied unless an occupied recreational vehicle is present on the lot. The primary entrance to the enclosed utility/storage structure shall face the recreational vehicle. Words underlined are additions, words slrerek AWwugh are deletions Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD, PDI Last Revised 0612212015 Page 2 of 7 EXHIBIT W, ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PRINCIPAL AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES", ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 2007-85, THE NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD, IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: EXHIBIT B NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PRINCIPAL AND ACCESSORY STRUCTURES Minimum Lot Area Minimum Tract Area Minimum Lot Width Minimum Tract Width 2200 SF NIA 30 Feet NIA TABLE 1 MINIMUM SETBACKS (IN FEET) U.S.41 HENDERSON DRIVE HENDERSON CREEK (from D.E.) FRONT SIDE REAR MAX BLDG HEIGHT* Office 25' 25' 25' 10' 10' 10' 25' / 32' Clubhouse 25' 25' 25' 15'** 15' 20' 25'/40' Bathhouse 50' 25' 25' 20' S' 25' 20' / 27' Maintenance Bldg 25' 15, 25' 20' S' 15, 25' / 32' Boat Storage Bldg 25' 15' 25' 10' S' 15, 13' / 15' Personal Utility Bldgs. a-5'21Y 15' 2455 0 /15'**** 15' 0 315=5'***** 10' / 17' Pool Deck 20' 15, 15' 15' S' 15, NA Tennis Courts 20' 20' 25' 20' 10' 10' N/A Guard House N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 20' / 25' Motorcoach Slabs 25' 20' 20' N/A 0/9*** 10, NA Other Accessory Bldg 25' 25' 25' 10, 10, 10, 25' / 32' * Maximum zoned building height per LDC definition / Maximum actual building height per definition ** The porte cochere for the clubhouse shall be located 3 feet from the right-of-way. *** 0' setback on one side of lot and 9' minimum on other side; side setback for motorcoach slabs only shall be measured 20 feet from back of curb **** Personal Utility Buildings may be permitted to be constructed up to but may not encroach into a landscape buffer easement. ***** Personal Utilitv Buildings may be permitted to be constructed up to but may not encroach into a landscape buffer easement or a lake maintenance easement. Words underlined are additions; words strwelE dwough are deletions Noples Motorcoach Resort CPUD, PD1 Last Revised 0612212015 Page 3 of 7 • • C� EXHIBIT B-1, ENTITLED "NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TYPICAL • MOTORCOACH LOT", ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 2007-85, THE NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD, IS HEREBY AMENDED: • • Words underlined are additions; words s#ae# thmugh are deletions Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD, PD1 Last Revised 0612212015 Page 4 of 7 MINIMUM LOT TYPICAL SLAB & UTILITY BLDG TYPICAL GradyMinor O. GraJr ror aM PmdW sarrJJ. Fkwt& 34134 CivilPnglnt n UwdSurve_%" . Planners Land9cape.UVWWts C,n.(AJR. FAmlil llT, of AMNIA a0ki151 ll Y u:2stKx * gonna WS W 239.947.1144 rrm. f.NJv471ner. coM F)OMMpen: 239.99a.4399 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD EXHIBIT B-1 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TYPICAL MOTORCOACH LOT EXHIBIT F, DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS SPECIFIC TO THE PROJECT, ATTACHED TO ORDINANCE NUMBER 2007-85, THE NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD, IS HEREBY AMENDED AS FOLLOWS: EXHIBIT F • NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD DEVELOPMENT COMMITMENTS SPECIFIC TO THE PROJECT 5. HURRICANE PROTECTION/PERMANENT LOCATION OF MOTORCOACH VEHICLES Motorcoach vehicles may not be permanently located on any lot and no permanent residency is allowed. Homestead exemptions are prohibited. The maximum stay shall be six -nine months per year. Within 60 days of plat approval, the developer shall record a covenant running with the land in the Public Records of Collier County referencing this restriction on permanent residency. The owner, or user, of the unit is responsible for registering his or her arrival and departure with the manager of the resort. Failure to register shall hold the owner or user responsible for any penalties imposed by Collier County. No unoccupied motorcoaches shall be left on site during the hurricane season and all motorcoaches must be removed from the subject project if a hurricane watch is issued. C� is Words underlined are additions; words sowek thregk are deletions Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD, PD1 Last Revised 0612212015 Page 7 of 7 • 0 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED MAIL TO: Fix Spindelman Brovitz & Goldman, PC 295 Woodcliff Drive, Suite 200 Fairport, New York 14450 Attn.: Richard S. Brovitz, Esq. Consideration = $0 FOR VALUABLE CONS Acquisitions LLC ("Transferor") Resort LLC, a Delaware limite in and to that certain real pro Florida, as more particular Transferor's right, title and ' to Real Property and pertainin or 4305425 OR: 4460 PG: 1144 11CORDID in OITICIAL RHCORDS of COLLIBN COUNT!, It 06/09/2009 at 11:11AN DNIGR B. B10a, CURL Be FBI 35.50 DOC-.10 .70 Retn: WIMSS/QPS CLOSING DSA 250 BILK CROSSING BLVD I4 1OCHS711 IT 14624 QUITCLAIM DEED ,which is hereby acknowledged, Morgan :Fetuse�a4 c compan d forever quitclaims to Naples RV ror's right, title and interest, if any, Prope ") Id ' the County of Colliers, State of i rt Ah hereto, together with all of 1 ees and rights appurtenant to the OR: 4460 PG: 1145 IN WITNESS WHEREOF the• undersigned has executed this Quitclaim Deed as of June 1, 2009. TRANSFEROR: MORGAN ACQUISIT LLC By: N e: Robeile Morgan itle: Manager WITNESSES: Print name: t' \,sf %. 0 0 OR: 4460 PG: 1146 ACKNOWLEDGMENT ATTACHED TO QUITCLAIM DEED State of a) Y0l K ) y�,, ) ss County of � � bnrhp-- ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this49 day of 1_, 2009, by as�& r of MORGAN ACQUIS IONS LLC, a Florida limited liabi ity company, who is personally known to m otiy�R coU�� G Aawlu igna of P o Taking Acknowledg rnt bli State of /NW for • C� o Commission o is 'o ires: Iva '5 / , a o o E CIR r,A,a�„�w Kan *** OR: 4460 PG: 1147 *** EXHIBIT A TO QUITCLAIM DEED Real property in the County of Colliers, State of Florida, described as follows: All of NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT, according to the map or plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 49, Pages 35 through 40, inclusive, of the Public Records of Collier County, Florida. �'NE CIRCA 0 0 • • • CH RE90R-T A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF BLOCK 'L', HENDERSON CREEK PARK tST ADDITION. AS RECORDED IN PUT BOOK B. AT PAGE 41 AND LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA DEDICATIONS/RESERVATIONS OAK ALL No W TMCM KMTs THAT MANS[ KOMMAOM M OM V F Ma. A II.OMOA CWYWIAIRM, M OIIMK d M L/VIK KNAKD N[Illdl NAs CWSW TIN MT aN/iPa[a MDTMIOOAtII AtldIT m K YAK MID aKs IEIpY KacAw AND MEMIIN As FoIIDAW A. KMCAw ro COLKII O'Amm Iw sKtNNN DM ANRMW •A' IOM YK WY 1. A WWI-[INYNM AOKss WLYIN ((AE. O1R1 MO M Au A[IMW TWl1 W1wMMMTM, A N M REOWws. UTI,,, 0 A" MK LMMIN m im RMNOWRY YLOICA *AMOK row Mr-1 WM1aY. WAKCT TO M s) EAUMEM" Tm Mn DrolenD xatar (cuc, vuc, ME. wu.cl rYl xo IwNwYrlw MO E, E. MR AIM IVOLUM L AL NAWMAN GW1mIA ME) M KFICMD IMIYWI NA MD KYa1TAwltt IN YANmMICL 1 ALL IM[ YM1Q,Ailt[ uWW[wn II.YE.) M DTImm N1KMA wM xD M[YMISWun FOM YMl[MAAAK. a 06111.AR m ca,wM wlwrf wLNW-KKW OIsw t PROPERTY DESCRIPTION CDY-AMmax, IMTOrAN�I�WMYR [ W PLMw10 A INIYK K YAGIID WDd[ A MIO MA OAAXKAMR d CM IMM WMN P11YKE,nPo1sK1[r IMP VANURAMt. w1Q MINw GW N.KM NM XL' M pINI1WN ]. AL IMiNN Wm M, KKM fA m KNSIWmTN W" TN NATWD ARU INON OF am J AIR 4 I .MLV f Il1Wl IVW, DWMK AI%OrNI m M ACKPTANOE OF TNNE N1RIY VA— IAGINs PMMNMT m M ATPUGN[ CW WTr SNIO! M AwD01WN W Mf [oal • r IAK N d M FILAR r N M[MMATWW. wCLODMID SION KT INM N M DKL v I . MID wKANKa alNm M -m-0 ry AN m--w a D[MGw m CWIIRI Ommw. Iw m%AwVKc s MID M UaT MAWLY IN[ WXIIWI AND KLNR 'aymn Y DL� Jr rWDYa Al M MWIaVEASf MO d [1000 1, IVENOOWG Galt 1ANt 1N 1. A NG'—1 ACCNS rA[rypT [Ac) DNEI imp WIDLO 11ADlS 'M' IN M RAMCK OF AK�w R M Mr 11YIwDr q p[fgINN N Mi WDK a D [YGKNLY LAID aMNI NaYN WNa[f M%YLa VO~ M[YNINUIY fN1 A7 N d M Wlrq a d fAlliM CNWM RROJ M MM[ BW A FGrt AT M rlNRmarr v M sOMMW[snWr-v-wr IMIL d aL MwIWY N (1MNN rWMJ A 20OW r0*1 wN Nam[-v-m a MMAM A NON-GaLaK rYN1t VwIW [AAMEM" b.LLa1 m NL I eaft, a1 [NM KA MINK G PAN.rt AND M YL71waY NGr-d-MY lllw N MINIMUM 0M.9 A m0 POK wK LIrR�FW1I TKwY IIIN aav/Y.q a. ALNN M GII IN[ G VAIIaS N rlalN K *"MAT IG NNA u1m1T NAW Wa MMYNMO GNfnNmTlWI, WALAROR YA MMEXMN AIR O,GATOM Of VIEW K'1KCIN[ rAAG��1�[;; YIWUOWO .SAW llOWt L AMp Altltl M KIWKr Nair-v-Wr IOw v tY0 CANS W1MEWll ]RIAIKa ,WaaN TWT WNW 11fy K suauT m AND NOT MICCIKSTJrIr MiM M ur[ ry CMAIM CWWITI Wm -AWN OMIrO[ W M [YNT A lfI1MK KMPAMT OAYAwW M MRIMlW1a1 SPY[ MW A OMTANq d aaal rwl: T NM AYN•W. A DI Nan AIM A IAGITEs d Alma■1 ,I.Nm WMITr R KL K sOldT M[YW190L[ iWl SAR KNANs. PUS A Few AMK A IAA ttlA WANK RM wwOd N g o mm F VON OW11 FOO A CUVAA AfsaNf R TO M/PL[f IIDmKOAM KNRT NDNOMIYR ASSOWAIIOx, Na, m sIIOLCfEdR G Or O JMSK mR aIRAN WN rl1•R'll•w, rG A mrAMt[ v Jl].A IQT o M FEM HAIR WIw MMTAYNYL NW A ■RAMC[ v raoD iF[r m A MIT MI A ISVE LWM NAM /Rf Kaf v AI■ PAPNIII m M W1RaY sWMOMr 1. TWACr'IY M PPWAw NDK aRlr-v-Wr R-o- /lr WW.ECI m M ussYRIA Awcm d A m0 FAR UK OSWMAW [MWMMT M KCM M AT M. YOK Ta OAK m MW a%ssomm as. M[ 100 v M N KOONS d Kulx LOCATION MAP IIWgAmY,(P.Y.[, L[. 0.L AC rim Nca,GOWYIY mA YA/IIRI/rICL ApApIWr MI/OW] AK WN DWW1Y,,=. NOW M A bR OMA KIMsr R.s11a cv1Aw IATWAYs~r m PAq V. AOMIWr NAMAN. "I LAKa wo—I AN TW mMK a 1slM LAWN S IS W YEN M Aae d NOT TO SCALE M A. wAtw •A'. 'r. MO 'C N DIRT ]PAR TO LAMDOCAMI0. IIRa1lORlODo Waa IW Wm M W m M 1pr, IWN0 A WANn Or SNCN mT TN AMOM A rpTMl NICIL d ITM . AIA/IRNEa ar A rJW W d riN WEr At A WW AM ryE1W� T PPU Pia 9"01 ro M usWRIA N orM1CR0 xG[N[ "Al KAMA v M.[0 W32%. FOW A WfINIK d WLK [[VET m M RID v W WWM m RMI Y]mYv[. ALWIO [AR IPA LYwO AsaO M MSi v AK FAWAI■, M usWKt IWImMY APPROVALS 3 WACT •L• M A L/W[ FOR oMAwAN Aw s1aN MATCH WMAORVENi FUPowa W WiCT Al M RRRKAA DRmm IIR[vI WM RfPoMWWI/IT IK YMIMMIfL m P A 10D [Opr YW[ RYNAN uEypT NW A RAYMwL oI Ip.M ffLT m A PLAIT MI tW oWAVMVAMY RaR-v-WY LAW v Ya HIGHWAY M (TAYNO MAM} CMW1Y LAN WOMmm A slAd Y Y vd YAW WRwer m A NAYMI1TIONA. AYD KAMAOE uW:YMT (o.L) Aa MOM HIMP P WA M[YDNWNITY IRS YA.KMA fL Twoom WN aS/YWy1L. mAn M woo soYMRaRALY MWIT-d-MY 1LIOFaaQ.DCJ[aMKO 1mwmIF11 N AA Am l n0.00 FORT X [[� m aK MW KR[ T IACKNO FOR C MIK RM OUPWI M, RONOA —TU— KACT •r As A CONDO AM FM SKT MM1 FLIIYNN WTI MrV GRIMY ION YMIRMNK. M ALL DassIAN tAxworm Du.) As omm Massimo WM KWMIWKIR — ammoMIK. T. ALL ACCESS EMTMMMIN (Ar.) Al OPRNO MOM WA KWNNSRYw TOO MAMMMAM E. ' - . • . •..A Er � J J/r— A ALL SNOMN Gmmurs tamp As wwo Nowell rim MtlFOMrWYTY m MAxTEWAKL A Y A UOZKYMYIKNIN rAIRMMn WM.L1 Al dlwRO NM[G rim M[YMxEM1Tr, FK RIKYRrIo MOM Y Old MT AMWOWD SY AM RWMmW mMWN WAR P AKARI CDWITY. nOmMA, ON WY IT. ML IAWRCAPI awN uWYrWn aL As OPCIEo xWKw FG W[ PVMPOK v mK NaTAF� Y rRIfA4 WKWA[ MR a011AQ rim .� , 9 u. A WARwr ,aYAw uwlrr uscwWr DwM At LOTa Mo wACA .l 6 D� [ AIID W IN T s OW[CIK/ M rlAlsoK d CMIPWw:TN, WsrAuaal YANWWMK[ AN o,Yu Ml[M. sMNAM1 Km MR MOM MER IIPLr1Ra Oran M[YMo0mv IWI YAMiFAMICE. OdANTY ATmPKT OVER" 1' MI C r. MVMK TO NMLES M0IMWOI MOPERMIT. W. A T[OPWA MWGATWL M sOCCLSfOMS K lIN MT AIFPN�C CMNn ATIOM[Y m RY KT P AMOMS ]NORM 1. TENT'F' AS A COMM AKA FOR KANT W= PUWM% 1ry''Wy."� NO •l Al A OWMWo AMG FOM KGEATAWI lKEJTT FUIWOKa WTI M[TA`MIMKIJY ro1111/wlo1A1R rRiOr A M [AKYRnS DPwm IEfwlw CWM1Y CWMl610N Al m'"" A R l m J. OO MA M ra WIIM w AN SwWAK NIYo:s WRJECT m M rASEupn DPWnn ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TRs MT a A,PMOY[D FN nco." W rxAAAWAVM PRI d M NMo DOFY�a -r Em VT ww WM FaM uMVIMd. RAR d MA ENa d M M OVVJA M ♦ wAOT •C' As OPM YAK s T m A WTMAKOUL AN MARIAN GSRYAr t(pL,, )M ', OPCm II[f1E A WIN MO KYOxs01I1Y FG YA AMAm E. Alm m N %,mA— DF PIIIYAA �� �(�[i�j( OAMTI d _U/rLU ooGl LDf OWRIIa MIMm W, SONMD CDUMIY CWNSrWIGS OmYT; RORM Y01rN1A1OJdoMo N MYMY MAf CMIWD M[NWTS m K aGm G INRA>� .s[p�J�r��yyjjIl[[ �K AG �.CAIp•OMpI JMK •y1'[ t ]OW' N OHMMM AANPLEGERWTWLWAM KMT. NO WIMO NOON CIILTIY TWT TN MT INS ItCM pIMIrI[D ry Y[ LAID SWf R () ST � IMAH COMPLIES N FORM NTH ArW n 01 W A'VEO Ill It vjm 1 FI[■01 -� lMA1[TT a lOR[ll �1 �e JfWA AJ !A/W'J% '1,C <: rvN r aimyyMT WCWR AT S.aYAiL. FIYWCRAf (ssN •��o p�}a ssss �1-..•- •na .p NMOVAT COn i v KNI IL VIA r�.•ryr rJMQ tdWMSSi�I— L�6AiRP�tdi1S� r;�,�. •' �J' S. MNWP MAN "1. WM�Or[. .•.. .. .. PLAT BOOK L4q PAGE I SHEET 1 of 6 1 WINAMMD Lmall MOM KKKww Mq WIL NN No NAMIMItAMMa KK sIIPPLAN1kD M MTIORw SY AM OIIIrM GMIN M WaiA IMOI d M MT. AIRW WV S[ MTMTNwAt WL1T[EINR'1WT ME IIK KNN[D al TIN MT IIYT WY K /WND N M NMMAC MM%c, v Tlb IAwn NOTES um "O,MdW MC N % NO CO AN TIMMI IIIMLff OIII[IIMOK MOrO. Al CUIIW Mw TAMKNIYL MD CMMM. ■ ONCAm FOND PONMaIT 11[IRl MOC KPOMOVAT, I-W c V[ MWMMEMT D MOM p ICAPWA I�M1 ICKNI E(YM aDWLNOIT MT N KDwgA1Li W YMCA 0 PIAYAIMWT DWMMaL • MNYm PGAA d W EMWAOII N'Mls P LIM —v. PNIA Of rOmma. rco Or NVMMW CINVAIMK G rrwn Or mrE """A" AL DNMGm ACCESS [AL[MAMI OY.L )RR.Im CWM1V .AM EA[aM11T 0.L NOIOAm OR -MAN [AERpIi ,MI MCAM NANO OGOrtT[ M ALMMT rw mulls roMlm MOM MOM IIN.L NWGm SMeaAIAOM [ASMMT LYL NWOAm IMIMSCAN SNrM EA[WYIT LYE. UWATTS tAA[ MMTIRMAX EAEROIT M,M MMAm NO-fAWA NAM —m,al/I MDT WT RYL PIMNIAm PUPA IIIAIR EMRYRO sFN YRrwm an,M xAL AMO aN N vn wr MWWArts Wawa YaMMwMT Al U101 Mn MRG TO WT AIA KN[TW MAIM OATIM (Mara.} W ILK, LJMC Or IMIIOEASOM ONEM F�MI 1K AWNN WANK Of m IC AATMT� Al KWMKD W MT WON A PAN AI Or M ,NLm KdW00 OF Ca CWNTY. ILDMRA. �MKi MW rMlgMOfK ls KMD II AVON N dMONO] I1Mt M. OF WINIO MOM"` Or CAMEO comm Al M TWA Or '.'A ON ,NFGn AMP LOCAm N ROOD WAVE Af ww A OAK PION aA 10011 Of S MAMA OF lEN A(aD Nar0. d IIKL K WWMpl�yaal )M FKIW WII(MOINY INVEL 1 0(PONINL.1m � I WON. Ctl1aAT C0Y�WWTV FLOW ,LAM Y.YIA000rt wFIK I011 WAKRIT wKD [WW NIMN ". NM[.KtD T1MAD PAVE MT WSWITKM Or COTTALWN WANK FROM AN M" aaVD. TO aN M MV.a. ,M M Y.AAW% GIKR AN ONMAK PIANW ROAM [Y Mal MOMNA NO. MAN AM wK WIWa ]/D7. SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE I NRWWY CGSFY TNT M ATTALTMD MT Or MAFM YO101N01AM K=n A WMI.LT P KATv INGAI NOMK CdKMiCIWMOII o ;n-ASOK0 MMKKTM CallRl OOIMIY IIMNA MM WSN ON A S0IMIDMY AlMlY v M FMOlOIIr MAN WY .01 YOYNw�MMfWa/ N FMNE�N, mw[M[xpMm IIMNW WYM PI tf AwMWI Al M�Kow. KKRa a CWMiB1AIn FNr 1,�NgI VWffiW 7 NOWAMEM WN[MAN IAWORWON KL K Kf FRG m AVE KONKtl r MW MT AN PEMYANpT OONMMa PaMTt AN I.OT lAals WLL K KT MK TOPNAL AL'CPTAMG rW M KMKN NrILW.MAA — MWREa Ills COAfrM.,AAm OF AuwoNTMYM NAIRW LA ITTa WTO'Y•*s FL e,.A•�AWLW al w �i NA1lDA iy�A\ THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY 3YAaDIr o THOMAS M. MURPHY, P.S.M. #5825 I 7 Lsss _1 BDO .FIL. Wry [ srApR) / .. NEWIPW, tt. 74710 FlOTMCwN1MN on AuOmAatlNo.I7177Y NAPL,ES MOTORCOACH 1ZE ' T A. REPLAT OF A PORTION OF SLACK V, HENDERSON CREEK PARK 1ST ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, AT PAGE 41 AND LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANCE 26 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA K E Y M A P SHEET 3 SHEET 4 SOND£RN£N DRIVE �I o! o! W !g z! SHEET 5 THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY THOMAS M. U-- MURPHY, P.S.M. *8828 ON enure wti P. )FL'N HOLE MONTE9 �,� AWo,latlm No,f iii ROaf 16 0lIHP IRRVN n • A REPLAT OF A PORTION OF BLOCK V. HENDERSON CREEK PARK 1ST ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 8, AT PAGE 41 AND LOCATED WITHIN A PORTION OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 51 SOUTH, RANGE 28 EAST, COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA a § i 53 TRACT "J" 9 Tro xu <iE:it:•]C:it"7.[k: tI]V/MKXI -11II[J[!•I)!Fi♦ i3Fii/fdi3�L4!Yi �•I6F1�EL� •fL—W6M `i♦ w4f: [iiL'i[L'L[r;iwS5.4ipfUllt t•47CE::it:}�M.litidii•s Li10C1•i1 �� iI: ES£:•it::�i]i�G"'iEL�Y7[�Ii[:J•tI6ia <d[ FA!}F.•; i �::� k: � rt[[ tug [:[:>t[ �^iafEE•a E� -IIE1�l:!f:1�F[[AIM[1C1l:dFa f; i[.�i.u:� %_ 1•!F?[, i [ilk. t'li i iR III E)F.'r�•i7piiF.: THIS INSTRUMENT WAS PREPARED BY THObY-.MAS M. MURPHY, P.S.M. /5828 960 Encas VWy t4OM, FL 3= HOLE MONTES Ph": f23ol'2644M F4W C.,Wk. w d ��� Autlo,k�tlon No.1712 Am m mw.IA I MMVM V Rios �i J r / ' � A I IL] SUBJECT PROPERTY zu H, EN • �- z °��� I,ELT,P.,aIm.DR._._........_._._�� 3 QCui Si V Henderson Creek DR AV ���Sontlerhen DR c! l Q PTTi ag, rherison DR �\ l �.._:...... . it T`: _.—_._... _...; _...... Ir qL� ,;�•'?� �--i Cal �(._�-.-,.ZIRCON DR Jad R3 I El Amethyst AVE / i 2112!�* • F ol�nrANc$ NTO, �ar�=� AN 09INNAMM (W TM BOARD tV COUMPY { {Rtttuos ��AMENOM 'aS OW COLLIMa COUNTY, OiNDUriAN= ' DZVUAMV MT CMM WHO MCLUM TM COMPBBHONSIOS ZtfNING R®GULATIOM IlM TM € UNU7OORPM&TBD AREA OF OQLI.IIZR COtWff, BYAM NINNG TIE AFROMATZ ZOMM ATLAS WAP � MAPS, BY CHANGING TIN$ ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF THE HER= DROCRUM BSAL PROPERTY P"M THE MOLLS ROMI, TRAVXL TRAUM BSMATIONAL VUWU CAMPGI[OUND, AND HEAVY OORINURCIAL ZONING DISTRICTS (MH. DEVIIi,Opb DISTRICT CT _ PLANNED UNIT MEXNMVN AS TTR NARM MOTOaCOA XZ90FM A PROJECT A LOCATM ON TAB SOOTHWW SQL OF TAMIAMI 72A1!<. RAW. APPXOX UTM'V TBRES QUARIM or A ME EAW OF =3 ONE CAPIII, IN SgL"r ON 4 TOWNSHIP a SOUtiI~ RANM 25 SAW. CXKJ. At ODUM, FLORA, COILIM2M OF U2 AC:tI<$; AND BY PROVIDING AN BF#3C IVZ VATS WH MBAS, Robert L. Dank AXP. of Rob Moors. Sac.. ropreamdkg Nsf*u Motoraoaci Ream, bc� peddowd the board of Caaag Comminim o to dram tie zmas dardtlptdoa of go babe deacna teal property. j NOW. TEERHIMY. BE Ir ORDAV41W BY TM BOARD nV r"Wry � PASSED AND DULY ADOPM by a VAW-M$Mty vote of the Board of Cmmty C, "M 0fC0WWCmwAy.Fbndaddsjj—dmyaf 2007, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMMIONERS ',AOM CEO. tx COLLIER COUNTY. FLORIDA BF By: #fiPayer IAXW6X--M--TA-. L A0PjmWas to fam- md Ao&AWcbhm-" EWbk A.- Lid of Alm" Uses H%Mbit lk Corm wdd DVWJQpmm Smdw& p LAW Dmo%dw sit h=� K- IjK OflapMd De*atkm DffdDPMM CWAdb=M Spft to the Ph*d 0 Thk ordbonm fdod whih *a SWl=G#J=oW j�L of _Y�mO7 mw code - 'do - atom 17*% apr i EXHMIT A NAPLn MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD ALLOWABLE USIM No I OiWiml or , ar lot tha+eotr shall be or ' put for o0her than the tWbwiW ceded. altered or wed, or 1ud used„ in whole A. Prindral Uses: jbyR ocow �ooct vehickk as dam*W holh 010 (t) Class A motorcoach vehick per ed p�let3 spoa). Motorcowh vehicles shall be defined as base vehicles which halls bete cNegorind Recreational Vehicle Industry Asaociaaos of Antmu (RVMA and the Family Asaociatim (FMAI as Class `A" or "Motor oadhes^ and/or {aetwy eastammd bus than (a) are ah W6i in accedence with the eodo of of the RVIA and we sdf-M elloA and c ou pk*ly aelf�oomaisred vahicks, which include an the Of a homrs including, but not limited is coddog, ekaph% shower and bsdu om arestarwu Wsothatthedriver's seat is acrmsibtebran the living am in a wal ftcontain a minimum interior height of 6 feet in the living reasr (e) have a miairnurnfeet, a maximum length of 45 feet and a maximum width of 102 inchesave a faced roof, as opposed to the-pop.�p�ptua suds ri'r yip ' me or service which is comparable in astute with the uses sot forth herein and is to be eompahbb in hire dilb iot by the Board off'T,oning Appeals. $ Aeieassr5' Uasrs aaa and straawres Cts►camuily assockted with the permitted principal mes and but tat limited to: 1. a 00marily associated with raarahma vekwk parts„ sscch as tetra WM and social (bath nrdocr and mWoor) WmiuMn ties boildhrgs building:. Isaadries and similar services 5or oraupaots of the park Reaasian facilities may bat are sot limiW se swimming pools6 tennis coo ts. bossing facilities, ptaygrommd and for iadow recreation. 2. ity bm'Wings as may be required for the operation or MgMAnanoe of the 1000 park not to exceed 3. (27) proposed docks. 4. 7M. exit boat ramp. 5. A storage facilit3►, in tha appnatimaee toettion shown on the CPUD Master Purr, with ap to 32 paces The actual maximum height of the building A WI be 15 feet. 6. It entity burNjup having a floor area up tD 100 agnate fat are pemnbW on each bWM had rrtotmoosch tot and can have ba@aonm facilities. Rovior i0.24.07 k • �1T B NAPLES MOTORCOACR RESORT CM r sPAmDAm SAL Am ACCEssORY smucTum Minimum Lot 2200 SF Minimum Toad N/A Mieiaeum Leet id9i 30 Feet Minimum Tenet ieflb NIA TABU 1!l�flEipM S>g'I'BACICS [Il1i I�r�n IJ.fL 4f Ilf�NpBR8pi+1 03tIVE PEIYDERSON CREEK 1trom D's') PRONT SIM REAR MAX BLDG HEIGHT• Otiia �' 25' 25' 10' 10' 10' 2S/32' Clubhom MI 25' 25' IS's; 15' 2W 25740' Badhome SO' 25' 25' 20' 5' 25' 20'/2T W 15' 25' 2W 51 1S' 25'/32' %dafmp 25' 15' 25' IO' 5' IS' 131/15' Pa utility Bidg. 23' 15' 2S' IS' 0 15' 10'/17' Pool Deck 2W 15' Is, 15' S• IS' NA Tennis Cmu 20' 20' 25' 20' 10' 10' N/A Guard Homo NIA NIA NIA N/A WA N/A Vint Idawromh Slabs 25' 20' 20' N/A 10' NA d Accessory BMS 2S 15' 25' IS` 0 1S' 201/2T * aoae 1 bddini bdak per IDC ddW km / Maemam neftd baileliasE bd& per deflaIdw RR Tbopm it A -ne for the dabbma shad be bscaW 3 fist f s the r al. •r* r ed 4n a w We aflot and !' mhds on otber sdq side setback br aotorosaeh shahs nay dwU be areaand 20 f%+om bad[ orcNrb Re+riMed 1O 24007 I r am am I W UnInFCOM* R"o.ate 531UWW NPF wa Dowvelkq*ctnmt StmWwftl Pkwma Cookma of Motorcosch Lod"' my PM �r.wy LM r — ttt uy wemI woft1 "ftm, W- "Ma Md10NG0ACM Im, 0 -J<Om NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT I CPUD f NAPLES / FLORIDA CONCEPniAl WAI 1- &1 ANDSCARE DM."--Q FOR BOU S-TO-R-Aic E)QiIBFTC-1 I SKT.Lk0l I OCTOBER 20071 m*Affftmwm i #k UMVMTWSECTM I ELEVATONA Sftbr-w 4LUBMTED ELEVATION 0 srl"r.m • M 3. 1 4. 1 zxz mrr x NA,PLiI S MOTORCOACH RLSOfrr CPUD LIST OF REQUES'CED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC SPECIAL BUFFER A deviation to Section 4.06.06 of the LDC for the western side of the project along the cask, to require a fifisat foot (156) buflbr south of the boat ramp and a*acwd to the canal and to n ubftm a 10 That Type A buffer north of the boat ramp. The reduction of the buff br from 15 fed to 10 fed is the subjectof this deviation. Mar jusdficatkm for this devotion is that north of the boot ramp the aQoising tend use is a p mwrre. Area located noM of tfhe boat ramp and to the west of the amal, requires a lemr degree of buffer This is Deviation * 1. PARKING MQUIREMENTS Padden# for accessoty uses shall be computed at 30% of the normal mquire meat as set forth is Section 4.05.04 of the LDC and this is a devistiah to this section of the LAC. The justification fnrthis deviation is, with multiple indoor and outdoor facilities wathvh a shot mbing diumm of all mosorocach 1ats, parking would not be etilined at normal standards. Waikia& golf carts and bikes are the primary means of tramportatian. This is Deviation 01 PRIVATE ROADWAY W1UTH A deviation to Socliorh 6.06.01 of Isis LDC sot to ragaire 60 foot ROW width. Excepting tote wide =*awe way, private roodwsp shill have a 24 foot right of way width. The jusMication for this deviation is tilt Ire rod rim -of -way is wide margb to auxr I . I I - the travel lames, medimR (if appliaablea draiasp swaks and utilities, and shall atherwiae comforts to the Constaructios Standards Manual. This is Deviation 03. OFF-STREET PARKING AREA A deviation to Section 4.05.02.F. of the LDC fist squires that off -noon parking areas not be accessible fiam a sheet alley or other public rigk-of-sooty mod all off-street pub* fltailitia mart be wnagad so trot so motor vehlck shall bane to back also any streek excluding single -finally and two -lenity residediat dwdbup and duucbet:. The justification for this devidion is to allow for limited parking for rutcramtional areas depicted on toe CKM Master Plat to back into the private right -of way essersertt area. The justification far this deviation is that the coofrgaration of these anon is limited in thou sine and conf notion and as a rahsalt foie required parking can be mac ahsily accommodated wilh this deviation. Fa ithermore, traffic volames am low due to the nature of tote proposed no as most patrons walk rather than drive and speed limits we posted at teen miles per hoar. Tbese fitctors will offset safety considerations and allow these limited parking areas to batter gem the naafis of the resort. This is Deviation 94. 10.24-07 Page 1 of 2 W S. 6. NAPL S MOTORCOACH RESORT CPUD LIST OP REQUESTED DEVIATIONS FROM LDC (CONT...) LANDSCAPE BUFFERINO A devistica to Section 4.06.02.C.4 of the LDC that requires a 10 foot Type D butt'ar to a toad tight-of-wa y hdamd 10 the resort st time of site pbA apptwAd so as to allow fnr the limited pwkb* adjacent to the recreational areas as shown on the CPUD Mauler Plan. The fiW ticstios for this deviation is fiat the sine and co fturadon of fire remaratiosd area is riled is sine and tebesting the botfer area will reduce impervious nwfhoe and lash bt mare efi"te W utilkadm of these ease. 'ilia n pbW buffer will be located a4iaceat to the paridag areas as alcove on the CPUD Masher Plan and act adjacent to the toad rightly. Ibis is Devkwon 65. BOAT RAID PARKING A deviation to Section 4.0$.04. Table 17. panting requiramem so as not to require a miahnare of 10 spaces per boat ramp with a dimension of 10 fact wide by 40 that loan. The juadfication for this deviation is that no public aeoeaa will be albwjed to the boat ramp and UWI= will only be pmnksed to be stored in the boat staxaga building. Boats will arly be placed in the water using a boat trdler. Boat trailers will not be kit at the boot snap but tstim moved back to the boat stwW we& uaW noedod to maeove the boom bona the water. (See also Er lh" C-1-) Pape 2 012 • • IF, is r- F NAMES MOTORCOACH RZMRT CPUD DEVIELDPMENT CDM3ITIYlT1 n SPECIFIC TO nM PROJECT TRANSPORTATION REQUIREMENT'S Ali traffic oanW devices, signs, pavement malting, and design almm shill W in aceoedartoe wkb the Florida Department of Trmsporprtim (FOOT) Manual of Uniform Mxwra Standards (MUiv U currant edition, FOOT DesW Standads, cwra,t edifice, and the Nknuaal on Undbirm Traffic Control Devices (MUTCCD), cwTM aldm. Arteriel,lavel shINIP lighting slrsll be provided at all access point. Access 1 shall be in plots prior to floe issuance atom find Maiieete of omuparwy (CO). Access Points almm on tie PUD Master Plan are aoeddw d to be conoeptaw. . Notbiag depicted on any such Masser Plan shall vest sty right of access at any specific point along my ply may- The trumbw Of sooass points coustrrrclod may be lea: dna the ummbar depicted an due Mnaiar Plan; however, no addhional access points shall be considered unless a PUD auuI I In is approved. Site telated iaVmvsasents (as opposed to system related improves) neommy for safe ia*reea and Wave to this p ojoet, as determined by Collier County, shill not be 014%le far impact fee credits. All r*Wred inuprovemarts sWi be in plow and avaiissble to doe Public prier to eaaaseacerma of on -site construction. Nodde$ in nay Dawbpment Order (DO) shall vest a d* of me= in aware of a ri*t condition at cry Mess. point. Neiduer shalt the misiasoe of a point of a POW of e8rs+s, or a median qmW& roar the WA dkenof, be the basis for my f d= ease of action for danages against the Canty by the Developer, its successor in tide. or gas ON& QMW ('county reaarras flue right to close any rtwdm opeeing mcistirg at say ties wbkh in found to be adverse tie► tin: bsakh, aft, and yellers of the Public. Any atrob a odiffeations shall be based on, but not Inaited to, safety, opwaboad circrLrtion. and roadway tenacity. If MY required tun Weis impatiamat requires the use of wcistiing Comfy or Slone ROU-of Way Or UNCOMMON then caarpswedi tg Right -of -Way AWI be provided sa no aaat to ColHw County as a consequom of such baprovanent(s) upon firm appnovd of doe tuna ISM deep during the first subsequent development order. The typical cones section MW not differ from the witting: roadway unless approved, in writing, by the Trangt0etatim Division Administrator or his designee. I& in the sole opinion of Collier County, tuft signal(s), oduar t dit control device, sign, PavOM" molting 1104wavanmt within a public Right of Wary or Essemeot, or site related innProremsrtts (as opposed to system reWed irnMwenrarts) aeceasay for safe kWm and qPM to !his project, as determined by Collier County, is determined to be neoeasrry, the cost of sreh fnuprovement shad be the n+espeansibility of due developer, his suoc:caao 2 or antigun- The irnprovanai s :hail be paid for or belched, at the CoanWs distciott, prior to the appropriate corresponding CO. Money in the MM of 377,145.70, in lieu of, will be provided for sidewalks and bike Lae an U.S. 41 w*An 180 days of adoption of ibis ordinance. 12-11-0710 r'M DOC alien Page 1 of 3 2. 3. 4. S. • i. i F , NAPLES MOTORCOACH Rir.BORT CPUD • DZVZLOMM COMMITMB M SMCI nC TD THE pa=CT Roadways and Speed Limits. Roadways will be private and responsibility for ahmmsece WWI be the responsibility of the developer. Speed will be limited ro ten miles a hour on i» serval roadways and so poaaed. r CIONMt pairing in any place other then a desigoatod parking space Is prohibited. I Bicycle Parking shall be provided stall recreatioa areas, f irl Lny R6QUIRh3I CDM A 40 foot by 50 foot well Held else is and access is provided l the depicted upon the CPUD Messer plan for raw water public street. This oorayaaae / dedication shall be made at the brae of SDI', pia (or am an process) of Sae area witbhr sloe developrnerrt phase ad cord ift the area approved by Contttty start, and shall be conveyed to the Cawgy in asetnant. The develops will be ns xd reed a reasonable cost for the eeeement LANDSCAPIM REQUIREMENTS The developer shall providD a l5-foot wide buffer area that is comprised of faw rows of native trum pleated at a nmdmum of 25 feet on censor in stwggered caws as the Iieehderson Drive side of the covered boat atoralle arse. Trees shall be a minimum of is feet overall average height with a minimum diameter at breast bW& (DBH) of dues bhebss. There shall be two rows of sbedelcanapy trans drat include no oluseerwil; and two Fours trees of varied species that can be clustered. The 1 S-foot wide buffer shall she include a double staggered hedgetaw sleet is a minimum of d Rest bier at time of planrti The buffer area shall also include a wall that is a minimum of 8 feet high. At feas% balf of the Oquh d daddcanopy trees shill be pleated ce the Henderson Drive side of the wall. (See Exhibit C-1) DUMPSTMtS AND TRASH REMOVAL Subject In site pten approval. the developer shall plow a minimum of two Iarge dhm F i - s in the mobsensues area. who the maiatmreeee crew at the reseal will deposit trash collected (in plestm bags) 6r+om web let ?rash pick-up within the resort "I occur twice daily end then be coiiectod ftm the noWm mcce area by a oonmrherciel rubbish disposal may. HURRICANE PROTECIIONIPERMANENT LOCATION OF MOTORCOACH VEHICUS Motorooada vehicles may not be permanently located on arty la and no permanest re1311081c3ris slloatwed. Ha heasad exernptiota are prohibited. The mwdmum stay shalt be six months per year. Within 60 days of pled approval, the devahopwr shall racerd a oo vensad Mad tg with the ISM in do Public Records of Collier County reftre Icing this ratricdoth oa peemanem MMICecy. The Ownw. or over•, of the twit is responsible for registering his or her arrival end dopertum with the manager of the assort poijum to register shall bold rho owner of use responsible for any penalties imposed by Collier Catwty- No nnoeeupiad mcoraosches shall be left on sirs during the hurricane sass► and all atotorooechss must be removed from the subject project if a harricrute watch is issued. 12-1 W 1o11rIsot OCC scion Pays 2 of 3 • • 6. 7. �i. NAPLES MOTORwACH RESORT GPOD DZVBLOPl1R4i"NT CO11ll1YIIT1HEN't'S 13Pwmc TO TM PROJXCT REQTJU 'tom FACKMES The developer sW1 eumm that electrioily. central water and sewer, and Op, aphI , services are available to each rnolosooscr site. Traab for the individud lob and from the nowfim l area: stall be collected daily by the R+esort's staff and placed in the dhanpsters Provided at the boat storago site. A contract with a wrote auarassmemt owupany will be made to empty the dumpst ws an an as need basil (one dumpstw will be for bash and fie other for reayelabies). The developer stall provide Unit" 6cilitiw kch1diN fmh toilet and growers is the reoreadorasl area adjacent to lire clubhouse but are act required with' n a 300 foot wall ft dkftnm ftm evvy lot. since motoroosches are equipped with there facilities and an addiflOW utroorn is allowed in the utility buib6hg pumittad on each lot BOAT DOCKSMAT STORAGE Poking for trailers shall not be peeggled at tM boat ramp (See Deviation 11i). No p EUM for trailers or boas: shall be pw mhkd on any mosorouvA Iot Boat storage shall be only permitted in the area shown as "boat stmage" in Tract L ad said boat storage sill be limited to a maximum of 32 bode on trailers in two. single -dory strercpures dna have a maximum height (acEwd) of 15 feat, In order io oerdral boat nse, the boats shall be pat in and salaam out to the water by the resort's rmaimeaance crews. This eownsh m is caanbft* with the staged objeodves of &a Collier County Manatee Protection Plan to reduce boWrelated nwmw maulkim achieve an optimal swbbuible russets: popubi % and probct Manatee habitat in order to Maure eoosistemcy with the Maemlee Prate UQ Plan. ft*w rarpanaion of bast facility :hail be prohibited. The Maximum member of boats docks Wall not mead 16 for individusl lots and one at the boil I" far a total of 17. The proposed bast docks shall be permitted pwWW and prspaed edw er"t where Mo rasses on p "ant slam the shoreline. The perpeadkoisr docks will be four font x 20 fed. If seapaaaes am present, then a ffiree foot wide perpNicafar aceear walkway :hail coas the aeograat area to a parallel dock outside of the to the aboreline and WWI sot exceed flour fed in width and 12 fleet In leng*. Bost :Waage for up to 32 bomb shall be parrnitud_ Parking for boat trailers sba11 not be permitted adjacent to die boat mW (see Deviation Nq HQY MON DRIVE ACCESS MIS a == on Henderson Drina shall only be used for rant and dumpster we. Access to the boot storage fecility shall not use Henderson Drive and no other delivery vehicles will use this sous. 12 11-07 b7 tisak3 t1t,'(; aCdorf Paps 3 or 3 COPY .aam OF FLORIDA) T OF COLTARR) 1. DWIGHT E. BROCK, Clerk of Courts in and for the ieth Judicial Circuit, Collier county, Florida, do y certify that the foregoing is a true and correct of: 0WIZANCi 2007-85 Which was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners e 11th day of December, 2007, during Regular Session. W17NZSB my hand and the official seal of the Hoard of y Commissioners of Collier County, Florida, this 18th if December, 2007. DWIGHT 8. BR,OCK . Clerk of Courts �� diiii' , Sac-officio to of County commisis By: Martha vergara. Deputy Clark • • • AFFIDAVIT OF COMPLIANCE Petition PL20150000736, Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD I hereby certify that pursuant to Ordinance 2004-41, of the Collier County Land Development Code, I did cause the attached newspaper advertisement to appear and I did give notice by mail to the following property owners and/or condominium and civic associations whose members may be affected by the proposed land use changes of an application request for a rezoning, PUD amendment, or conditional use, at least 15 days prior to the scheduled Neighborhood Information Meeting. For the purposes of this requirement, the names and addresses of property owners shall be deemed those appearing on the latest tax rolls of Collier County and any other persons or entities who have made a formal request of the county to be notified The said notice contained the laymen's description of the site property of proposed change and the date, time, and place of a Neighborhood Information Meeting. Per the attached letters, property owner's hereby made a part of this Affidavit of e (Signature State of Florida County of Lee copy of newspaper advertisement which are The foregoing Affidavit of compliance was acknowledged before me this 21 st day of May, 2015 by Sharon Umpenhour, who is personally known to me E)r- who has predused (Signature of NotW Public) Kimberly A. Scher Printed Name of Notary 0 GANIM Procedu /Affidavit Of Compliance (NMIRPUDA).Docx KISMYKWHM W COMM" t PF 17W4 EXPIRES: DNM *K 1Z M18 eona.a nw rrehyPrMlotAdM.�w GradyMinor Civil Engineers • Land Surveyors • Planners • Landscape Architects May 14, 2015 RE: Neighborhood Information Meeting Petition PL20150000736, Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD Dear Sir or Madam: A formal application has been submitted to Collier County, seeking approval of an Insubstantial Change to a PUD, by Naples RV Resort LLC, represented by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A., for the following described property: The subject property is comprised of approximately 23± acres, located on the south side of U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail East) on the east side of Henderson Creek in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Naples RV Resort LLC is asking the County to approve this application to allow minor changes to the PUD document, which would increase the size of the allowed small utility buildings on each individual lot from 100 square feet to a maximum of 308 square feet. Changes are also proposed to the building setbacks for the utility buildings, which are reflected in the modified development standards table. Additionally the applicant proposes to delete the current exhibit that depicts typical lot details and replace with an exhibit that provides less detail, which will permit more flexibility while maintaining consistency with the approved development standards table. The applicant also proposes to modify the length of residency from 6 months to 9 months, which is within the permissible time frames for other RV pa rks. You are invited to attend a neighborhood information meeting hosted by the applicant to inform nearby property owners, neighbors and the public of the proposed changes to the subject property. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for.informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing, and will be held on Tuesday, June 2, 2015, 5:30 pm at the Naples Motorcoach Resort Clubhouse, 13300 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34114. If you are unable to attend this meeting and have questions or comments, or if you have questions prior to the meeting, they can be directed by e-mail, phone, fax or mail by June 2, 2015 to: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com, phone 239-947-1144, fax 239-947-0375, Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134. Sinnccere2;L__ ly, 6i Sharon Umpenhour Planning Technician • n U Q. Grady Minor & Associates, P.A. Ph. 239-947-1144 Fax. 239-947-0375 • 3800 Via Del Rey EB 0005151 LB 0005151 LC 26000266 Bonita Springs, FL 34134 www.gradyminor.com N Ry ....... ... SUBJECT PROPERTY Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD Project Location Map 0 DR 9-D RECKEY NAMES NAMEZ NAME3 NAME4 NAMES CITY ST ZIPCODE USZIP4 LEGALI 62380003286 678899 ONTARIO INC 28 MEADOWCREEK LN CAMBRIDGE, ON CANADA N3H 4R8 0 NAPLES MOTORCIACH RESORT LOT %880002524 ACHCET, WILLIAM C-& MARGARET M WILLIAM J ACHCET 9 CHRISTMAN Pl. AMSTERDAM NY 12010 2507 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49593080003 ADAMS, MITZI 337012TH AVE SE NAPLES FL 34117 0 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 508MM1761 AESCHUMANN, RONALD-& JUDITH 22 HILLSIDE RD HARWINTON CT 06791 2517 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 62390001961 ALFRED L BARLOW REV TRUST PO BOX 273 OCEAN VIEW DE 19970 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 50890004289 ALTENBERNT, STEVEN C CAROL S HAYES 6625 JOY ROAD DEXTER MI 48130 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880006180 ANDERSON, ALAN W-& BARBARA A 6024 AKINS ROAD NORTH ROYALTON ON 44133 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5099=3947 ANDERSON, JAMES E_& JUNE E 74 KUMQUAT LN NAPLES FL 34114 8115 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5088=1949 ASHBY, PAUL H-& MARCIA M 174 CARISSA LN NAPLES FL 34114 9104 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880005806 AWAZIAN, STEVE=& VIRGINIA 1341 LAKE JAMES DR PRUDENVILLE MI 48651 9476 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880000746 BACON, ALDEN=& BARBARA L 32 HOMESTEAD DR SHERIDAN IN 46069 9333 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5MOGO0843 BAETZTR, DONALD C=& MARY P UTD 10-16-95 50226 MIDDLE RIDGE RD AMHERST ON 44001 9688 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50980002702 BAETZEL, PATRICIA E BARBARA) PELLEGRINO CHRISTOPER R BAETZEL 154 JASMINE LN NAPLES FL 34114 8112 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880005725 BAKER, E WILLSON HARRY WHITACRE 407 LEISURE DR HURON ON 44839 2675 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 495834400D9 BALLARD, HAROLD D=& JEWELL 415 COLLEGE MNR HARRODSBURG KY 40330 1121 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 49594600000 BAMFIELD, MILTON M=& MIN S 31555 ARTHUR RD SOLON ON 44139 4544 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADO 508NO04140 BARKER, JAMES DONNA KLOTZ 23283 JENNILYNN IN STERLING HGTS MI 48313 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 724000001 BARRON COLLIER PARTNERSHIP LLP 2600 GOLDEN GATE PKWY 8 200 NAPLES FL 34105 3227 2 5126 THAT PORTION OF THE 50980002867 BARTKOWIAK, STANLEY 143 MAHOGANY IN NAPLES FL 34114 9716 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49594640002 BASTRUP TRUST 3072352NO ST SALEM WI 53168 O HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 62380001767 BATES, BRIAN A LUIS F CORONADO 6 WEST RD DUNE ACRES IN 46304 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 49583240005 BEACH, WILLIAM R=& )DANE E 9935 CHEROKEE TRL CROSSVILLE TN 38572 6222 HENDERSON CREEK PK SST ADD 49581560004 BECK, DONALD B=& DOLORES J 1504 SCHNEIDER ST NW NORTH CANTON OH 44720 3943 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 50880005123 BEDARD, GILLES DIANE LAPORTE 2560 CHEMIN DES PELERINS SHERBROOKE, QC CANADA J1H OCG 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880005521 BEERS, BERNARD W-& JANET L 964 PALM DR NAPLES FL 34114 8739 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 62380002928 BEHARRY, MICHAEL 1 109"THWING RD CHARDON ON 44024 9793 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 50880002540 BEHNKE, JOHN E_& PATRICIA A 5915 CLEARBROOK DR STEVENSVILLE MI 49127 1312 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880D01402 BENEDICT, AGNES C 104 PRIMROSE LN NAPLES FL 34114 9130 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49532160000 BENSON, ROBERT JOHN PULLING 5630 YAHL ST STE 6 NAPLES FL 34109 1921 HENDERSON CREEK PK BLK F OUT 49582400008 BERKOSKI, ROBERT=& JOYCE 5960 AMHERST DR APT 8104 NAPLES FL 34112 9819 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 50880003882 BIALS, JOSEPH DIANE F LAW 71 KUMQUAT IN NAPLES FL 34114 8115 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50890000924 BLACK, BRENDA G 163 CEDAR LN NAPLES FL 34114 8105 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880004645 BOSS, STEVEN L-& GINGER 4463 LATTASBURG RD WOOSTER OR 44691 9277 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49583600001 BOWMAN, LARRY J=& ANNELLE H 316 E COTTAGE AVE W CARROLLTON OR 45449 0 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADO 50880005395 BRAUN, RUDOLF K MARY L REYNOLDS 971 PINE OR NAPLES FL 34114 8757 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880001363 BROWN, BAKER O--& LYNN M 193 PRIMROSE LN NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5088=3646 BROWN, JOHN M=& DARLENE M SW 19TH STREET VIRGINIA BEACH VA 23451 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880000885 BROWN, THOMAS S=& CAROL E 143 CEDAR LN NAPLES FL 34114 8105 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50680002281 BROWNING, MAVIS E % ROSE DEIS 4085 PIERCE RD MEDINA OR 44256 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880001745 BRUMMETT, AMY JUNE LYLE H SCIFRES 173 CARISSA LN NAPLES FL 34114 8203 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50890006025 BUCKLEYJR, FREDERICK H FREIDA I BUCKLEY JACK C BOWDEN JR 623 PALM OR K 301 NAPLES FL 34114 8719 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SOBBOO 827 BURTON JR, JOHN E_& PEGGY S 6855 EAST BEND RD BURLINGTON KY 41005 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880=788 BURTON, JOHN E=& SHIRLEY B 1300 VICKSBURG CT AMELIA OR 45102 2437 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49581600003 BYERS, PETER E_& CAROL M 41 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 8204 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 50880005343 CAMPBELL. HARRY G-& CAROL C 8306 FENTON WAY ARVADA CO 80003 1828 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880003125 CAMPBELL, LARRY WREN ANN MARIE CAMPBELL 333 MCARTHUR LN BIRCHWOOD TN 37308 6912 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 62380001149 CAMPBELL, RONALD J•& KELA R 210 N RIDGE RD RICHMOND VA 23229 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 77390000727 CAMPOS, KARLA C 13328 COVENANT RD NAPLES FL 34114 8773 TRAIL RIDGE LOT 12 49593720004 CANDITO, PATRICIA M MICHAELJ HARRIS PENNY S MARTINEZ 794 PECONIC AVE WEST BABYLON NY 11704 5638 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST A00 50880000390 CARDELLO, ROBERT 174 S COLLIER BLVD UNIT 304 MARCO ISLAND FL 34145 4301 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5088=5848 CARLEY, DAVID R=& PATRICIA G 791 PALM DR NAPLES FL 34124 8730 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880001169 CARLSON, SALLY B 184 CEDAR LN NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880000306 CARNEY, ELIZABETH A GARY L CARNEY 14090 LONDON RD ORIENT OR 43146 9738 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880002388 CARROLL, ROLLIE 8 LINDA S PERKINS 194 ROSE IN NAPLES FL 34114 8134 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50980003921 CAUBLE, DONNA JEAN KRISTINE MARIE MOEN 2880 ROYAL OAK DR NW BAUDETTE MN 56623 8847 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 62380002384 CAVINESS, MARVIN T SUSAN M KRASNOSKY REV LIV TAUS 5551 HENNSLEY CIA WELDON SPRING MO 63304 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 49582040D02 CLARK III, LAMES MARA I DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 8202 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 50880000720 CLOUTIER, MICHEUNE 262 PLACE LOISELLE PINCOURT, QC CANADA J7V 4A1 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5088000IS41 CLOVER, JENNIFER A 74 W DALE AVE MUSKEGON MI 49441 2525 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880001266 COAKLEY, EDWARD J=&UNDAH 39 SAWDUST RD WESTMONROE NY 13167 3321 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880000283 COAKLEY, JAMES WALTER JUNE MARIE COAKLEY 263 VOLK RD WEBSTER NY 14580 1605 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5098=2126 COLEMAN, JAMES R=& KATHLEEN O 9196 YARMOUTH OR APT B LOVELAND OR 45140 5606 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SOM0002169 COWER, ROBERT=& BETTY 53 SIOUX DRIVE RITTMAN ON 44270 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49582360D09 COLVIN, PAUL M 10 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 8202 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 50880004768 CORMIER TR, HENRY ANDREA H CORMIER TR HENRY CORMIER DEC OF REV TRUST UTD 12/10/99 60 COREWOOD COI MARCO SHORES FL 34145 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC CORRADO, EDWARD 107 AUDUBON RD NAPLE$ FL 34114 3958 HOLIDAY MANOR COO VE INC 495 COSGROVE, STEPHEN D-& KAREN C 589 97TH AVE N • NAPLES FL 34108 2279 HENDERSON CREEK SOB COURCY, ROBERT A 163 TEMPLE LN NAPLES FL 34114 9711 HOLIDAY MANOR INC 5088=2100 COUTO, CARL K=& DIANNA E 48 ROGERSON AVE ACUSHNET MA 02743 50990000500 COX, BILLY F=& VIRGINIA 1 1913 HUUT RD MANSFIELD ON 44903 50880002744 COYOUR, WES=& DAWN 3640 CANNON LAKE TRL FARIRAULT MN 55021 5088000118E CRAGUE, KENNETH E_& ROSEMARIE 13905525 E LAGRANGE IN 46761 50880000940 CRAGUE, WIWAM-&IMOGENER 3909535OW ROSEDALE IN 47874 SGSWW2605 CRANE, CHARLES J-& MARY ELLEN 122 SADDLETOP DR TANEYTOWN MD 21787 50880003086 CRANE, FRANCIS L=& ADELINE N 416 GARFIELD AVE EAST ROCHESTER NY 14445 5088=2061 CROSBY, RUSSELL A=& JOAN M 133 ROSE LN NAPLES Fl 34114 77390000743 CRUZ, ROSE 13332 COVENANT RD NAPLES FL 34114 49582440000 CUTOLO, FRANK 12 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 SCSW 01826 DALBEC TR, ALBERT S MARIE PAULE G DALBEC TR 154 GULF RD COLTON NY 13625 308800D1208 DALEY, STEVEN J-& D CAROL 25675 WILSON RD UNION CITY PA 26438 50BBOOD3785 DAVIS, NORMA JEAN 1385 STATE ROUTE 206 BRINKHAVEN ON 43006 4958328=7 DAVIS, SANDRA ANN 33 SONDERHEN DR NAPLES FL 34114 49581960002 DAY, NORMA 2795 CARDINAL LAKE CIRCLE DULUTH GA 30096 50980002045 DE LAND, DAVID-& MARGARET 12312 E D AVE RICHLAND MI 49083 49583520000 DEAN, WILLIAM ROGER DEBORAH ANN DEAN SARAH ELIZABETH DEAN 632 POINT MOUNTAI WEBSTER SPRINGS WV 26288 50880001486 DEETER, RICHARD W LAURIE SCUTELLA 4912 W RIDGE RD ERIE PA 16506 6238=3189 DEFEUCE, LEONARD M=& MARTHA H 121 BOARDWALK LN LEXINGTON NC 27292 49581800007 DEUSLE, GENEVIEVE DEBORAH DEUSLE 46 OERHENSON OR NAPLES FL 34114 6238=1822 DENISE K PACKARD REV TRUST 203 BEECHAN RD OAKHAM MA 01068 SOBBOOOSO84 DESSUREAULT, PAUL RACHELLE BERNIER 1185 HENDERSON CREEK DRIVE NAPLES FL 34114 724040100 DEWANE, BISHOP FRANK J DIOCESE OF VENICE WOO PINEBROOK RD VENICE FL 34235 49584440008 DEWRELL, TRACEY=& MARA 4231 PINE RIDGE RD NAPLES FL 34119 50880001868 DICKEY, DONALD K=& JOANN E 134 CARISSA LN NAPLES FL 34114 50880ODD908 DORAN, GARY 153 CEDAR LN NAPLES FL 34114 6239=1945 DORAZIO, NINO L=& DORIS M 30468 OTONKA TRL DAYSBORO DE 19939 5088=5220 DOROTHY J HITCHCOCK REV TRUST 2968 GRAMER RD WEBBERVILLE MI 49992 5088 MIS42 DOSTAL, JUDI TH E 9176 WEST MILLINGTON ROAD VASSAR MI 49768 5089DDD4182 DOUGLAS & LYNN MISER R/L TRUST 86 TANGELO LN NAPLES FL 34114 SOBSOODOD47 DOW, HARRY PO BOX 204 1472 ST RT 11C NORTH LAWRENCE NY 12967 50880005589 DRISSEL, ROGER A=& JANIS R 1702 WALBURG RD BURLINGTON IAR 53105 SOSS0001243 DUBOIS SR, REX D=& JUUE A 6328 TRUSCOTT DR CHEBOYGAN MI 49721 50881=2362 DUKE, RONALD E 231 N SPRING GROVE ST MEDINA ON 44256 7739000D620 DOME, MARIE J 13308 COVENANT RD NAPLES FL 34114 50880003109 DUNEGAN, MARTHA E JEAN C ROBERTS LOIS J ROBB 105 PLEASANT VALLE MONONGAHELA PA 15063 50880000649 DUNN, KEVIN G=& DONNA MARIE 26 SUNRISE DRIVE BOYERTOWN PA 19512 62380001123 DUNNUCK, WILLIAM R-& BETTY 13300 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES FL 34114 77390000581 DUPERRIER, GASTON MARIE G DUPERRIER 13300 COVENANT RD NAPLES FL 34114 50SM1460 E E & K A MOORE REV TRUST 481 DOVE CREEK RD FRANKFORT KY 40601 SOBB0003183 ECKLUND, DOROTHY C ROBERT F ECKLUND 124 OAK LN NAPLES FL 34114 495816BOD07 EDWARDS, JOYCE L BARBARA MCCORMICK 43 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 623SWO1806 EDWARDS. KENNETH W SUZANNE J ADCOCK 21003 W US HWY 150 BRIMFIELD IL 61517 5088=29" ELLGREN, ALVIN N•& LYNNE S 9519 E NAPIER AVE BENTON HARBOR MI 49022 49581880001 ELUOTT, MARYL 480ERHENSON OR NAPLES FL 34114 5088=2663 ELY III, HIRAM B=& DOROTHY K 156 TAMARACK ROAD THORNTON NM 03285 77390OW604 EMMANUEL, MACCELUS ESTERMIUA HYPPOLTTE 13304 COVENANT RD NAPLES FL 34114 SOSS0002508 EMPTAGE, ROBERT G-& BARBARA L SOSO RAMBO LN TOLEDO ON 43623 508BOW38M ERNST, UDO 24 SHEET BRIAR RD EAST GRANBY CT 06026 4959348=1 ESCH EST, HELEN Y 620 CAPRI BLVD NAPLES FL 34113 5088=3329 ESTES, KATHLEEN J 368215 WEDGEWOOD ELKHART IN 46516 50880003905 EUBANKS, LARRY-& DOROTHEY 14920 REMINGTON RD MARION IL 62959 5088=2320 FARRUGIA TR, FRANK FRANK FARRUGIA TRUST UTD 7/6/95 4319 WELLAND DR WEST BLOOMFIELD MI 48323 50880000102 FEDERER, JOSEPH 720 FALLOWFIELD AVE CHARLEROI PA 15022 SOBBOD01127 FETZER, WILBERT J 660 12TH AVE NE NAPLES FL 34120 5088=1984 FEURY, RUSSELL F=& ZINDA M MARY C AUL 1824 PARROT DRIVE TROY MI 48094 49SU160DOS FIDALGO TR, ALFRED D DOROTHY M HOLMES TR THERESA M FIDALGO REV TRUST UTD 8/19/O8 4 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 SOMWO542 FLEISCHER TR, DAVID S ARAWANA 5 FLEISCHER TR UTD 12.11-95 8311 MORSE RD NEW ALBANY ON 43054 S088DD04687 FONTANA, FRANK Lt& JOAN A 188 BLACKWOOD LN DOUGLASSVILLE PA 19518 50880002249 FRANCES EVERS-MARSHALL TRUST 1179 FOXBORO BARTLETT IL 60203 50880001907 FRANK FARRUGIA TRUST ROLUECAIROLL 4319 WELLAND DR WESTBLOOMFIELD MI 48323 SOBBOD02265 PREY TR, JACK L-& MILDRED J UTD 10-4-99 134 ROSE LN NAPLES FL 34114 49583160004 FULLER, CHARLESR 30 SONDERHEN DR NAPLES FL 34114 5098=5408 FURMAN, SAM 154 CEDAR LN NAPLES FL 34114 50880005961 GANTZ, WILLIAM E_& WANETTA M 5044 GRIES RD WEBBERVILLE MI 49892 724520002 GARCIA, JUDO C JESUS H HERRERA 4730 ISTH AVE SW NAPLES FL 34116 77390000400 GATEWAY SHOPPES II LLC 4525 E 92ND ST INDIANAPOLIS IN 46250 SOBN000526 GIAMMICHELE, LUIGI-& MARIA 2 SELWAY HAMILTON, ON CANADA L8K 6M3 62380001301 GIBSON, GARY=& MARY 2351 DAWSON CT RIVERWOODS IL 60015 2518 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 9758 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 8969 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 7118 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 1546 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 1318 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 8133 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 8773 TRAIL RIDGE LOT 13 8202 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 3229 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 4953 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 9206 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 8210 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADO 0 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 9642 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 1230 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 8204 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 6426 2 5126 BEG AT SW CNR SEC 2, 40" HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 8104 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 8105 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 8700 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 8605 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 9545 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 1964 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 8773 TRAIL RIDGE LOT 7 3540 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 8724 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 8773 TRAIL RIDGE LOTS 8949 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 8754 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 9204 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD D NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 9348 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 8204 HENDERSON CREEK PK 15T ADD 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 8773 TRAIL RIDGE LOT 6 1835 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 8682 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC $423 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 1457 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 1909 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 2303 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 1429 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 0 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 9575 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 9357 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 6134 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 8210 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 8106 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 9251 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 51" 3 5126 FROM NE COR OF SEI/4 1670 TRAIL RIDGE TRACT P-2 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 1401 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 49583940007 GLASS JR, JAMES W HEATHER WIGHTMAN 3 SONDERHEN DR NAPLES FL 34114 0 HENDERSON CREEK PK ISTADD 50880003361 GOODMAN TR, AUTRY R-& LINDA R UTD 9/29/04 17387 LAKE BEACH DR SPRING LAKE MI 49456 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49592480002 GORGA, SAUNA 136 PALMETTO AVE NORTH AUGUSTA SC 29941 2683 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD SD880003141 GORSKI, THEODORE P-& ANN R 4807 WOODLAND DRIVE RHODESDALE MD 21659 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5=0002689 GORTHY, ROBERT D-& PATRICIA J 8217 HARRIS RD LYONS - NY 14489 9358 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50980005288 GOUIN, KENNETH L GOUIN ELSIE K 13 GROVE ST PORTLAND CT 06480 1956 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50990005262 GOUIN, MARK L=& KAREN L 57 E MAIN ST PORTLAND CT 06480 1505 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49582720005 GRAVES, BURTON E B CREEK OR NAPLES FL 34114 8201 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 49582000000 GRIMALDO, JOSEFA 51 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 0 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 50630005880 HAAB, RICHARD A-& MARJORIE A 2 LAKEVIEW Cr FORREST It. 61741 9650 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880000497 HMKE, KENNETH DALE LINDA KAY HMKE 6791 CANTERBURY LN CLARKSTON MI 48348 2874 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 77390000264 HABITAT FOR HUMANITY OF COLLIER INC 11145 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES FL 34113 7753 TRAIL RIDGE TRACT L-2 50880003060 HACH TR, BARBARA L BARBARA LHACH REV LIV TRUST UTD 05/20/91 246 SHAWNEE TRL AURORA ON 44202 7935 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880WI004 HALER CORPORATION 2059 TRADE CENTER WAY NAPLES FL 34109 6244 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50980005628 HALL, MILTON D=& ANNA M 9S5 PALM OR NAPLES FL 34114 8749 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50980DO3769 HANNSZ TR, LINDA L-& CHARLES R LINDA L HANNSZ TRUST UTD 02/25/00 65 KUMQUAT LN R 11 NAPLES FL 34114 8116 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49591760008 HAPPNEY, STEVEN C 45 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 8204 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 50880004823 HARDEN TA, LAWRENCE H THERESE M HARDEN TR HARDEN TRUST UTD 12/7/05 1030 MARION AVE GRAND HAVEN MI 49427 2231 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50890002728 HARDWICK, MICHAEL W=& TERESA S 2505 NORRIS LN KNOXVILLE TN 37924 1720 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880004247 HARPER, DOUGLAS PA SUSAN C 607 PALM DR NAPLES FL 34114 9719 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880005987 HARPER, KENNETH C--& M SYDNEY WENDY L HARPER 65S PALM DR NAPLES FL 34114 8719 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880004742 HARPER, ROBERT=& SUSAN 49585 CEDAR ST BELLEVILLE MI 48111 1072 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49SB4520009 HART, JOHN W-&TERESAS 29127TH ST NW NAPLES FL 34120 1757 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 62380000784 HAUGLAND, COREY=& VICTORIA 11 OLD CHURCH RD MONROE TWP NY 08931 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 49582840008 HAUSFELD, RANDY•& PENNY 22 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 8202 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 5MOOD4109 HAYES TR, CHARLES S-& JANE M HAYES FAMILY TRUST UTD O6/03/02 82 TANGELO LN NAPLES FL 34114 $704 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5088=2980 HAYES TR, JOHN E JOHN E HAYES REV TRUST UTD 11/05/08 1640 LAKEVIEW CT BROOKLYN MI 49230 9344 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880002087 HEIERUNG REVOCABLE TRUST 143 ROSE LN NAPLES FL 34114 8133 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 62380003367 HEIL, STEVEN H-& CYNTHIA L 6516 HEIL RD HENRYVILLE IN 47126 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 49591400009 HELKEY-BURNS, PATRICIA A MICHAEL SBURNS 160 LAKE POINT LN NAPLES FL 34112 7073 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 49584200002 HENDERSON CREEK CLUB INC 5960 AM14ERST OR APT 8104 NAPLES FL 34112 9829 HENDERSON CREEK PK LST ADD 6238=3244 HENDRIX, MARY F 80 PUMPKINVINE TRL SE CARTERSVILLE GA 30120 6929 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT SOSO 01606 HENNIG, GEORGE R 203 CARISSA LN NAPLES FL 34114 8103 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880004564 HERARD, HAROLD J=& MARY L 2 BETTY ST AUBURN MA 01501 3100 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49583880009 HERRERA, ISAIA CHRISTINA CONLY 4 SONDERHEN OR NAPLES FL 34114 0 HENDERSON CREEK PK ISTADD 50880004784 HINCKLEY, DONALD E•& GEORGIA L 56 FAIRVIEW DR WINDSOR NY 13865 1101 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SOSW 03591 HINZ, JOHN-& DOLORES 1601 LAKE LAMES DR PRUDENVILLE MI 48651 9420 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC NSBOOOS107 HITCHCOCK, MATTHEW B DOROTHY HITCHCOCK 2968 GRAMER DRIVE WEBBERVILLE MI 48892 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880000704 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 1185 HENDERSON CREEK DR NAPLES FL 34114 5199 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SOBNO05466 HOLLOWAY, NORMA J RANDALL C HOLLOWAY SHARON RAE MORRIS 916 PALM DR NAPLES FL 34114 6739 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50890006106 HOOPES, CLYDE I=& SE17YJ KENNEY HOOPES 4325 WOODALE AVE SE LOT 29 MINERVA ON 44657 8563 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880001664 HOWARD, PATRICIA H THOMAS M HEALY 25 ROCKHURST DR PENFIELD NY 14526 9509 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 508MM2621 HUNTER, C DALE-& DORIS A 142 ANNA DRIVE SMITHVILLE ON 44677 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49594080002 IMM, BRIAN-& PHYLLIS ROBYN KROEGER TRAVIS IMM 12278 ROAD 101. OTTAWA OH 45875 9505 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD SOBWOO1305 IRBY, LOUISE 153 PRIMROSE LANE NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 6230M3765 IRVINE III, SAMUELJ 346 BAMBERG DR BLUFFTON SC 29930 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 50880000241 JANNEAU, HENRI C-& THERESE IS30 DIAMOND LAKE CIR NAPLES fl, 34114 9223 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 509900043" JOBST, CHARLES A-& JOAN H 14 COLONIAL DRIVE MOUNTAIN TOP PA 18707 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49584800004 JOHNSON, DON S=& BIANCA R 18 SONDERHEN DR NAPLES FL 34114 8211 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 50880003743 JOHNSON, WILLARD C-& REBECCA J 2034 TWIN RIVER DR NW BAUDETTE MN 56623 9834 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49583920008 JORDAN, GEORGE M•& FRANCES A PO BOX $025 SAINT MARYS CITY MD 20686 5025 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 4958144OW1 JPMORGAN CHASE BANK NATL ASSN 7757 BAYBERRY ROAD MACKSONVILLE FL 32256 0 HENDERSON CREEK PK 15T ADD 505MM5741 JUDY A HEFFINGTON R/L TRUST ROBERT K HEFFINGTON R/L TRUST 6071 N LAKECREST DR SPRINGFIELD MO 65803 7556 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49582600002 JULIAN, PATSY R 16 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 8202 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 50880001240 JULIANO, JOHN 1=& ROSEMARIE T 123 PRIMROSE LN NAPLES FL 34114 9129 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 62380001107 JULIUS 1 ANDERSON TRUST 13300 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES Fl 34114 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 50890004467 K E SULLENBERGER FAM TRUST 120 CALOMONDIN LN NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50680001567 KAUFFMAN JR, ARTHUR H ARTHUR H KAUFFMAN tit RONALD A KAUFFMAN 154 PRIMROSE LN NAPLES FL 34114 8130 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880005660 KELLEY, RICHARD=& LOIS DAVID KELLEY 90 CLEARVIEW AVENUE HARWINTON LT 06791 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SOSS 01389 KELLY, VINCENT L KATHLEEN A SMITH PO BOX 343 HORNELL NY 14943 843 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SO S0005505 KIEBACH, BRUCE A-& CAROL E STEVEN 8 KIEBACH THOMAS) KIEBACH 1700 ROBBINS RD Rl. GRAND HAVEN MI 49417 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880003222 KILDUFF JR, JOHN F JOSEPHINE H KILDUFF 26 STRONG ST BURLINGTON CT 06013 2534 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880006203 KING, ALICE M 2 LAKEVIEW RD PENOBSCOT ME 04476 3432 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5088=3620 KING, PAUL H•& DOROTHY M 58 TEMPLE LN NAPLES FL 34114 8763 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880000665 KLEY JR, MILTON B•& SARAH D 46161 FORESTWOOD DR PLYMOUTH MI 49170 3504 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50980001703 KLONOWSKI JR, THOMAS F LAUREL A KLONOWSKI 153 CARISSA LANE NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC & CORA LEE E'er H NHNK+NDIOLA KRISTAN LYNN KNIOIA . 523 PALM DR Fl. 34114 NMANOR 9718 HOLIDAY R EK pK 4958I KOEHLERC,�FRANK NNAPLES APLES FL 34114 8202 • 0 • 50860001321 KOSZEWSKI, DANIEL A=& DONNA M 2392 39TH ST WYANDOTTE MI 48192 4140 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SOBB0003002 KRYWKO, EDWARD-& PAULETTE 26102 SH 642 STURGEON COUNT CANADA TBR 2AS 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 62390003163 KUEHN JR, EDMUND J 514 AMERICAS WAY R 3251 BOX ELDER SD 57719 7600 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 5088=3698 KUENKE TR, THOMAS F-St RITA A UTO 7-15-96 3567 LINHORST RD HILLSBORO MO 630SO 3817 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 62380003052 KUNKEL, ROLAND JOSEF BRUNA MICHELI 63 CHAMINADE DR ST LOUIS MO 63141 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 5098=1923 KUT, MATTHEW SUSAN M ROSS-KUT JOHN C WILSON I" HAMLIN 5T ACUSHNET MA 02743 2W2 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5089=2223 KUTSCHBACH, ROGER-& AMY 1437 SAWMILL CV FINDLAY OH 45940 7077 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SO880005602 L & M A RICKERT IT REV TRUST 3142 S STATE ROAD 227 UNION CITY IN 47390 8487 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 4958276=7 LA RHETTE, JOHN M 20 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 9202 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 50850D04962 LACHAPELLE, MARIE MAIN PELLETIER 1185 HENDERSON CREEK DRIVE NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880002469 LACOMBE, GEORGE-& STELLA EUGENIE SHIPLEY KENETH SHIPLEY 10 ACACIA AVENUE WESTDN, ON CANADA M9M 1H7 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880000594 LAGACE, MAURICE P SIMONE S LAGACE 8 CADY LN NELSON NH 03457 5620 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49584360007 LANHAM, BILUE W-& BARBARA E 5242 TALLAWANDA OR FAIRFIELD OH 45014 3328 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 6238=2504 LARRY D MATHES INTERVIVOS TRUS 12806 GODDARD OVERLAND PARK KS 66213 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 50880005424 LATZA, DANIEL P-& SHARON 348 SMITH RD AMSTERDAM NY 12010 6360 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 495840OWN LAWS, SANDRA ANN MALORIE LAWS DIAZ 9839 POPLAR CORNER RD BELLS TN 38006 9041 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 508800039B9 LAWTON, JAMES R-& MARY C 927 RAYELLEN DRIVE BERWICK PA 18603 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50950004001 LEBLANC. GISELE 77 KUMQUAT LN NAPLES FL 34114 8115 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50800006083 LECHNER, LAURIE M 300 LYNBROOK DR GREENSBORO NC 27405 4319 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC S09MM1729 LECLAIR, ROBERTS-S, PATRICIA G MICHAEL R LECLAIR 3912 PLEASANTVIEW LANE RR1 VINE LAND, ON CANADA LOR 2CO 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50881=3442 LEHMAN, DONALD 173 TEMPLE LN NAPLES FL 34114 8712 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 6238=0768 LEIPERS CREEK REVOCABLE TRUST 40 BURTON HILLS BLVD B 100 NASHVILLE TN 37215 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 50980005026 LEPINE, CLAUDE-& CLAIRE V 323 BLVD CLAIRE VUE E 81206 ST BRUNO, QC CANADA 13V OB2 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50980D02922 LESCAR, BERNARD F•& BARBARA A BRIAN LESCAR TR BRIAN LESCAR REV TRUST UTO 3/2/07 7421 TRUMAN CT MENTOR OH 44060 4757 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5088=1509 LING, JOSEPH F=& MARY M 4616 GREEN GABLES RD BRAINERD MN 56401 7951 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880ODS122 LIVINGSTON, VELMA TIMOTHY LMNGSTON ANGELA DIXON 2397 N SNYDER RD DAYTON OH 45426 4427 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880004946 LOKKEN ARVID F-& BEVERLY E 9658 CARPENTER RD ANGORA MN 55703 9400 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC S0OB0004949 LOMNICKY, ROBERT E_& LINNEA B 365 GEORGE WASHINGTON TPKE 118 DUNCAN LN NAPLES FL 34114 8753 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880DOOD21 LONGANO TR, ARTHUR=& PHYLLIS UTD 3-6-91 179 FAN PALM LN NAPLES FL 34114 8326 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SOBBO002194 LOVEDAY TR, WILLIAM H UTD 12/27/96 15426 HATFIELD RD RITTMAN OH 44270 9741 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 508SWO3303 LUDWIG, CLIFFORD R=& GERALDINE 103 TEMPLE LN NAPLES FL 34114 8712 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880001680 MACEIKA ET AL, LEO 252 E CHERRYHILL ST PITTSBURGH PA 15210 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SOSW 02883 MACPHEE, LOMA 153 MAHOGANY LN NAPLES FL 34114 8716 HOUDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 508800060D9 MAHLE, JAMES S-& SHEILA P 639 PALM DRIVE NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SOB80004441 MAILLET, JOHN P=& ROSE MARIE 45 DURANT AVE MAYNARD MA 01754 1067 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SOBBOOD4360 MALONE, PAUL F-& LUCY J 30 MAGNOLIA DR WAPPINGERS FALLS NY 12590 7045 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 725760007 MANG, LELAND C-& ANN L 1420 HENDERSON CREEK DR NAPLES FL 34114 8741 3 5126 FROM INTERSECTION OF 6238=3260 MANN, GALE E WILUAM C HEWETT 23279 BARWOOD LN N APT 308 BOCA RATON FL 33428 6749 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 50880D02443 MANOFSKY, MATTHEW B=& ELLA M KATHLEEN A MANOFSKY PATRICIA A KOPPES 412 BLUE JAY LN APOLLO PA IS613 8427 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 508WW3604 MARENTETTE, FRANK-& BETTY PO BOX 77 OLDCASTLE, ON CANADA NOR 1L0 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5099000S922 MARTIN JR, THOMAS M=& KAREN J 2028 AMES DR PORTAGE MI 49002 6430 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49523120D0Z MARTIN, DENNIS A KENNETH 1 MARTIN 6237 WALNUT WAY CUNTON WA 98236 9507 HNEDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 49583360008 MARTIN, THOMAS R-& MILDRED 35 SONDERHEN DR NAPLES FL 34114 11210 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 5088ON5929 MARTINEAU, JEAN CLAUDE 230-25 RUE DES MOUETTES QUEBEC CITY, QC CANADA G1E 7G1 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SOBBOOD1046 MASIROFF, GARY=& DIANE 124 CEDAR LN NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 4956252=1 MASON JR, IOHN H 14 DERHENSON OR NAPLES FL 34114 8202 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 50880005644 MATHIEU, JEAN JACQUES VALERIE MULLER 939 PALM DR NAPLES FL 34114 8749 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50980003963 MATTOCKS, ROBERT A=& SYLVIA H 3626 FLEETWOOD DR ROCKFORD IL 61101 1934 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880002796 MAZUREK, CARLT=& L01S W 103 MAHOGANY LN NAPLES FL 34114 9716 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49582640004 MAllARELLA, LAMES A-& FRANCES 362 LOWER LN BERUN CT 06037 3004 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 5098=2346 MC LAUGHLIN. JACQUELINE 174 ROSE IN NAPLES FL 34114 8134 HOUOAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880004SOO MCCRUDDEN, WILLIAM D=& JANICE 2461 E HIGH ST N-12 POTTSTOWN PA 19464 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880004328 MCDONALD JR, JAMES C 4911 HOLLY LN MOREHEAD CITY NC 28557 2695 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 4958136MOO MCELVEY, YVONNE 35 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 8204 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD SOBWO1282 MCPHAIL, JOHN W 647 CHANDLER ST TEWKSBURY MA 01876 3703 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880004629 MELANSON, EDGAR KAREN MELANSON 34 AME7HYSTAVE NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5OB80004221 MELANSON, JOSEPH L-& CLAIRE L 34 AMETHYST AVE NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 495WB0000 MENTE, MICHAEL 1 13 SONDERHEN CIR NAPLES FL 34114 8231 HENDERSON CREEK PK 15T ADD 5OBS0006067 MERCHANT, JERRY A-& SUZANNE V PAULA R BALLANTINE 7942 ALTON ST CANTON MI 49197 4200 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49583560D02 MEYERS, STEVEN 40 SONDERHEN DR NAPLES FL 34114 9210 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 50880004425 MILGRAM, ROBERT PO BOX 620 PORT CRANE NY 13833 620 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49594280006 MILLER TR, LOAN L JOAN L MILLER TRUST UTD 11/8/00 4551 STATE ROUTE 1 BELLVILLE OH 44813 9007 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 49564760005 MILLER, BURL V=& PAMELA D 350 BUNG ER ST LIGONIER PA 15658 1162 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 49584400006 MILLER, DONALD R=& SHARON B 4577 TREEVIEW DR NORTH CANTON OH 44720 1153 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 50980000869 MILLER, GREGG J=& SUSAN K IS04 LACEY CT NILES MI 49120 8665 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880006164 MILLER, JAMES D-& IRIS PATRICIA ANN BEHNKE 507 PALM DR NAPLES FL 34114 8718 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50890001648 MILLER, ROBERT W MARGARET JOANNE MILLER 123 CARISSA LN NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 77390000646 MOINIUS, LEMOINE=& MARIE M 13312 COVENANT RD NAPLES FL 34114 8773 TRAIL RIDGE LOTS 50B8D001583 MONS TR, GERALD E_& CAROLYN T G E & C T MONS REVOCABLE TRUST UTD 10/21/97 PO BOX 933 AU GRES MI 48703 833 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880003507 MOORE, IOHN J=& LOUISE K 52 TEMPLE LN NAPLES FL 34114 $763 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5098=3565 MULLERY TR, JOHN =& VIRGINIA 1 & V MULLERY REV LIV TRUST UTD 09120/07 29 TURQUOISE AVE NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49583760006 MULLIGAN, JOSEPH F VIRGINIA A MULLIGAN 1 SONDERHEN DR NAPLES FL 34114 8211 HENDERSON CREEK PX IST ADD 49583680005 MUSTO, SAMUEL W NANCY OICOCCO 43 SONDERHEN OR NAPLES FL 34114 8210 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 5083=2304 NAGIN, ISABELLE M 422 RAMBLE ST HOT SPRINGS AR 71902 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 62380000140 NAPLES RV RESORT LLC PO BOX 9025 IA JOLLA CA 92038 9025 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT TRACT 50880005191 NELSON, JULE ANNE 924 PINE DR NAPLES FL 34114 8756 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50980002622 NICHOLS, DAVID 0 JEFFREY A PLANCK 2030 ANDERSON COVE LN GNCINNATI OH 45244 2683 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880DO0429 NICHOLS, DAVID 0=& MARY K 113 WILLOW W NAPLES FL 34114 8139 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SOSSOOD0445 NICHOLS, MARY K 04RISMPHER J BREWER 4038 PLEASANT GLEN DR LOUISVILLE KY 40299 9376 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49594120001 NITZKO, BERNDT 6602 VAN RD CASEVILLE MI 48725 9798 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 7739000068E NOVEMBRE, LOUISE 13320 COVENANT RD NAPLES FL 34114 8773 TRAIL RIDGE LOT 30 50880002809 NOWAK, RICHARD G-& DONNA 1 113 MAHOGANY LN R 140 NAPLES FL 34114 8716 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880005327 OAKES, JAMES D=& ELIZABETH M 2540 57H ST BATH PA 18014 9285 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49583320006 O'KEEFE FLORIDA TRUST 18811 SAND LAKE RD IRONS MI 49644 4412 HENDERSON CREEK PK IST ADD 50890003400 OSICK, MICHAEL=& SUSAN G 67 PERKINS DR HUDSON FALLS NY 12839 2616 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49581640005 OTIS, JOHN ALLEN RONALD LEE OTIS RICHARD LEE OTIS 85904 MILE RD EAST LEROY MI 49051 9772 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 50880OW607 OWENS, LAMES A-& PATRICIA L 1D4 WILLOW LN NAPLES FL 34114 3140 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 62390002944 PACKARD TR, RANDALL DENISE PACKARD TR 203 BECHAN RD OAKHAM MA 0106E 9724 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 50880000461 PADDOCK, JAMES W-& LY14DALL M 11451 RALSTON AVE CARMEL IN 46032 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 62390003781 PALLAY, JOHN-& ELIZABETH WOOOLEOGE VILLAGE PO BOX 46 HAWLEY PA 1842E 46 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT SOSM02825 PARK, CHARLES W ROBIN MULLEN-PARK 1505 SENECA TRL BROOKVILLE PA 15825 4427 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 62380000522 PAYDAR, REZA PO BOX 9025 LA JOLLA CA 92038 9025 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 50880004920 PFEIFFER, DONALD=& MARGARET 1790E HIAWATHA DR SPRING LAKE MI 494S6 9125 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 62380001987 PIEPLOW, JOHN W=& JESSIE M 247 OYSTER SHELL CV BETHANY BEACH DE 19930 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 62380003147 PIPPIN, CHRISTINA L PO BOX 705 2657 JERICHO RD WHITE RIV 1CT VT 05001 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 50880002485 PLATT FAMILY TRUST 1030 CHANNEL DRIVE CICERO IN 46034 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49592290008 POKORNY, ROBERT DORIS LIMON 126 N HIDDEN BEACH RD MARBLEHEAD OH 43440 2526 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 508MIC62 POPP, NICHOLAS S-& THERESA H DEBRA MALLINSON ET AL 134 CEDAR LANE NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5088=3280 PREGNO, IIMMY L=& LINDA A 174 OAK LN NAPLES FL 34114 S727 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49582080004 PURCELL. MICHAELA PO BOX 590 MARCO ISLAND FL 34146 5" HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 6238=1084 RALEY, RONALD 8=& GLENDA C 690 TOTTEN WAY CINCINNATI ON 45226 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 49582920009 RANKER, MARY C=& JOSEPH L 1100 W TOWNSHIP ROAD 28 TIFFIN OH 44883 9323 HENDERSON CREEK PK IST ADD 49583040001 REDENBAUGH, JACK 1=& BOBBIED 27 SONDERHEN DR NAPLES FL 34114 0 HENDERSON CREEK PK IST ADD 495828000D6 REDENBAUGH, KIRBY 21 DERMENSON DR NAPLES FL 34214 8202 HENDERSON CREEK PK IST ADD 49583640003 REED, RICHARD A KAREN DARGUSH % RICHARD A REED 9978 S BEXLEY OR STRONGSVILLE OR 44136 2526 HENDERSON CREEK PK IST ADD 49581940009 RICH, RONALD N 47 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 8204 HENDERSON CREEK PK IST ADD 50890004904 RICHARDS, RONALD G- MURIEL G 121 CALOMONDIN LN NAPLES FL 34114 8750 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC S0980001187 RIOUX, MARC 1425 PLUMBER AVE OTTAWA, ON CANADA KIX 4A8 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 725200004 ROBERT J FIORILLO UV TRUST 550 SHALIMAR ST MARCO ISLAND FL 34145 5436 3 5126 FROM INTERSECTION OF SOBBOOODO89 ROBLEDO, JAIME L=& MARGORY 133 REDWOOD LN NAPLES FL 34114 8131 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 77390000101 ROMAN, IRMA 1 13324 COVENANT RD NAPLES FL 34114 8773 TRAIL RIDGE LOT 11 50880000762 ROSE, BERTHA M I" WILLOW LN NAPLES FL 34114 8140 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880000623 ROSE, DAVID L 44 NANCY ST FAIRHAVEN MA 02719 4835 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880000403 ROSE, DAVID L-& BERTHA M L03 WILLOW IN NAPLES FL 34114 8139 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880001224 ROSE, WIWAM B=& ROSE M 3330 FIT 6 WATERFORD PA 16441 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880000348 ROUSSEAU, THERESA 174 REDWOOD LN NAPLES FL 34114 8132 HOLDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880005369 RUDDER, WILLIAM A=& SHIRLEY L 3383 STATE ROUTE 7I5 W CAMDEN ON 45311 9652 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880005686 RUDDEROW, IOHN A=& DOROTHY M 240 ELSO LN MOUNT LAUREL NJ 08054 9635 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880003264 RYAN, DAN M=& PATRICIA PO BOX 149 CASSOPOLIS MI 49031 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 62380003561 SALKELD, DANA L=& C ROBIN 5617 SILVER OAK Cr ROCKVILLE MD 20855 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 77390ODD662 SANTAELLA, EDWIN RAFAELA DELGADO 13316 COVENANT RD NAPLES FL 34114 8773 TRAIL RIDGE LOT 9 50880001525 SCHAFFER, RONALD JOSEPH JOANNE BARBARA SCHAFFER 651 2ND AVE HALE MI 48739 9259 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 49582680006 SEAVEY, BEVERLY 18 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 8202 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 49582960001 SEBOLD, ROBERT T 25 SONDERHEN DR NAPLES FL 34124 8210 HENDERSON CREEK PK IST ADO 49583800005 SELLS, ROBERT M SUSAN L STEWART 2 SONDERHEN DR NAPLES FL 34114 8211 HENDERSON CREEK PK IST ADD 62380003066 SENATRO, DANIEL F-& NANCY E 446 MAIN ST UNIT 4 OLD SAYBROOK CT 06475 2576 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 50880000209 SGROI, VITO 193 REDWOOD LN NAPLES FL 34114 8131 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 6238=3545 SHIELDS, BRUCE L=& SHERRYJ 1952 OAKLEIGH WAY KNOXVILLE TN 37919 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT SOBOD006245 SHINARARGER, KEITH AA JUDY 184 JASMINE LN NAPLES FL 34214 8112 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 5088000324E SKIBA, GERALD E_& JUDITH E 56 FAIRMONT AVE AMSTERDAM NY 12010 1122 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 62380000923 SLEEGERS, HARRY JOSEPH ANNA MARIA SLEEGERS 4266 WESTCHESTER BOURNE BELMONT, ON CANADA NOL1B0 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT SOBWO04998 SLOAN, JOHN E=& CONSTANCE L 1213 GRANT AVE GRAND HAVEN MI 49417 1921 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SOSM=2647 SMITH TR, AVONELL AVONELL SMITH TRUST UTD 9/20/06 5003 MEADOW RUN MILLIARD ON 43026 7264 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880001800 SMITH, LINDEN D-& BETTY 117 W NORTH 5T BOX 44 VANLUE ON 45890 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 50880001961 SMITH, ROGER D-& WANDA A 194 CARISSA IN NAPLES FL 34114 8104 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC Es SNIFF, JACK W-& CONNIE S SNYDER ET AL, EDWARD O PO BOX 173 115 MEADOW ST BRONSTON TRIBES HILL KY NY 42518 12277 273 HOLIDAY MANOR COO VE INC 0 HOLIDAY MANOR '0 INC SPENCE TR, WILBERT E DOROTHY M SPENCE TR UTD 10.15 93 411 WEST CANEEL OF TECUMSEH MI 49296 0 HOLIDAY MANOR CO jwINC 50880004263 5000002906 SOBW 05783 $088=3549 5088=3484 49SB1720006 62380001848 50890004891 49582560003 49582240006 50980001020 50880004166 50880000322 62380002009 SGUOOG5709 50880002401 50890002207 77390000329 50880DO4662 50880001965 50880005068 50880000966 5088=1098 5088=2427 50880005165 SOSSM3727 50980000128 5088=1347 5088=3662 50980002841 5089=5945 508BOW2566 50880000063 50880000267 50880000568 49593960000 49382200004 50880003468 49581320008 49584560001 5083MS204 50980004493 SOSS 05482 49583400007 49SBI920000 724500003 5008=5563 SOBOM3397 5088=3824 49593200003 50880002142 SPERLING, MARION STEFFEY, ILA 1 STEWART, DARRELL STIPANOVICH, NICHOLAS STONE, SUZANNE STORMER, FLOYD STRIKE, JOHN W-& PATRICIA A SULLENBERGER, KATHRYN SUPERNAW 1R, SAMUEL CHARLES SUSAN SWEENEY TRUST TAYLOR, GEORGE T=& HELEN J TAYLOR, MARION F TAYLOR, RONALD G THOMAS W DAIGNEAULT TRUST TIGNOR, )ON SHELBY TOMLINSON, GEORGE R TOOLEY, LARRY=& PAMELA KAY TRAIL RIDGE HOME OWNERS ASSOC TRAVIS PROPERTIES LLC TRIMBLE, ROBERT C TRUDEAU, RICHARD TSCHOPP, GLENN E TSCHOPP, VIOLET UMLAND, BONNIE UPDEGROVE, DAVID I=& BARBARAS VAN ZANDT ET AL JR, FLOYD VANDERWAL, IOHN VANDERZWART, ROBERTJ VANZANDT TR, DONALDA VAZQUEZ, CARLOS=& REGINA WALKER, ROBERT=& SANDRA PATTI WALKER-WINDNAGLETR, MAXINE WATSON, RANSOM A-& CHRISTINE C WATSON, RANSOM=& CHRISTINE WELLS, JAMES H=& FREDIA L WESCOTT, (AURA L WESSEL TR, PETER WHITE, EDWARD P=& MARION J WHITE, HENRY J= SYLVIA V WHITE, SYLVIA V WHITFORD, JUDITH 1 WILCOX, PHILUP=& THEDA WIWAM L WINDNAGLE L/R TRUST WILLIAM R COLE REV TRUST WILLIAMS, JAMES E=& BETTY A WILLIAMS, ROBERT E WINTER JR, HENRY FRANK WOOD, DAVID D=& VERA F WRIGHT, DUANE E_& NANCY L ZAKOIAN JR, CHARLES G ZUZELSKI TR, KAY L • 90 TANGELO LN NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC JERRY CECCHI 163 MAHOGANY LN NAPLES FL 34114 8716 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 17820 BURNS ROAD OCHOPEE FL 34141 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC NARY JANE S71PANOWCH 155 MAPLE LN NEW LENOX IL 60451 1158 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 1220 REDWOOD CT MARCO ISLAND FL 34145 2327 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SANDRA K HOARD PO BOX 292 MOGADORE OH 44260 282 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 533 CHURCH RD BATH PA 18014 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT 120 CALOMONDIN LN NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC SHANNON MARIE QUINN 213 NETTLETON CHARLEVOIX MI 49720 0 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD MARIE L MARTIN TR 7 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 8202 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD DONALD E TAYLOR CINDY 5 FRY 1311 W MOORE RDA HILLSDALE MI 49242 9397 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 895 STATE ROUTE 369 LOT 50 CHENANGO FORKS NY 13746 1798 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 2221 SOUTH PRESTON STREET LOUISVILLE KY 40217 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC PO BOX 678 HOLDERNESS NH 03245 0 NAPLES MOTORCOACH RESORT LOT LESU TIGNOR GUZMAN 7415 EUGENE AVE SAINT LOUIS MO 63116 4052 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC MARILEE RYAN 13 TICONDEROGA DR BORDENTOWN NJ 06505 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 4994 CABERNET DR BRUNSWICK OH 44212 4705 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 11145 TAMIAMI TRL E NAPLES FL 34113 7753 TRAIL RIDGE TRACTOS-2 418 PERSIAN CT MARCO ISLAND FL 34145 5045 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 184 CARISSA LANE NAPLES FL 34114H7 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC LOUISE ST GERMAIN 137 CALOMONDIN LN NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 500 MAIN ST LYKENS PA 1704E 1307 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 193 CEDAR LN NAPLES FL 34114 BIOS HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 27102 S FOUNTAINVIEW OR CRETE IL 60417 6309 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 2304 PRINCETON AVE SANATOGA PA 19464 3128 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 63 KUMQUAT LN NAPLES FL 34214 8116 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 115 ROCKHILL CT MARCO ISLAND FL 34145 3929 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC JUDITH A VANDERZWART 5450 SKYWAY OR NE COMSTOCK PARK MI 49321 $203 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC DONNA VANZANDTTR D A & D1 VANZANDT TRUST UTDS/12/00 851 DUNBAR RD WINDSOR NY 13865 1339 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 133 MAHOGANY LN NAPLES FL 34114 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 3037 TIPTON STATION RD KNOXVILLE TN 37920 9509 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC MAXINE WALKER-WINDNAGLE TRUST UTD 9/20/96 2964 SHORELAND AV TOLEDO OH 43611 1248 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC DENNIS & MADOLYN E MORGAN 5 SCHENONE CT PLAINVILLE CT OW62 1040 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 134 REDWOOD LN NAPLES FL 34114 9132 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 164 MOSLEY BRANCH RD WOODBINE KY 40771 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC BRIAN LEE FI TZSIMMONS 6 SONDERHEN DR NAPLES FL 34114 8211 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD PETER WESSELL IRREV TRUST UTD 2/14/06 6 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 8202 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD 399 ISLAND POND RD DERRY NH 03038 5909 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC DOLORES H OESTERLE 34 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 8204 HENDERSON CREEK PK 15T ADD DOLORES H OESTERLE 11 SONDERHEN QR NAPLES FL 34114 8231 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADD JEFFREY S WHITFORD 7596 S CHANDLER RD ST JOHNS MI 48879 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 4 DELLROSE CIA TAYLORS SC 29687 3802 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 2964 SHORELAND AVENUE TOLEDO OH 43611 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 23 DERHENSON DR NAPLES FL 34114 9202 HENDERSON CREEK PK 1ST ADO 624 RAYSTOWN RD EVERETT PA 15537 3316 HENDERSON CREEK PK SST ADD 1ERELYN J COBB 3240 STH AVE SW NAPLES FL 34117 4102 3 5126 FROM NE CDR OF SEl/4 556 RIDGE AVE SAINT LOUIS MO 63229 4272 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC PATRICIA KINNEY 143 TEMPLE LN NAPLES FL 34114 $712 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 7023 MARWYCK DR CENTERVILLE OH 45459 5029 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC 31 SONDERHEN DR NAPLES FL 34114 0 HENDERSON CREEK PK IST ADD KAY L ZUZELSKI REV TRUST UTD 11/28/00 50461KRAM OAKS DI JACKSON MI 49201 0 HOLIDAY MANOR COOPERATIVE INC NEIGHBORHOOD INFORMATION MEETING Petition PL20150000736, Naples Motomoach Resort CPUD The public is invited to attend a neighborhood meeting held by D. Wayne Arnold, AICP of Q. Grady Minor and • Associates, P.A. and Richard D. Yovanovich of Coleman, Yovanovich and Koester, P.A., representing Naples RV Resort LLC on: I • Tuesday, June 2, 2015, 5:30 pm at the Naples Motorcoach Resort Clubhouse,13300 Tamiami Trail East, Naples, FL 34114 The subject property is comprised of approximately 23± acres, located on the south side of U.S. 41 (Tamiami Trail East) on the east side of Henderson Creek in Section 3, Township 51 South, Range 26 East, Collier County, Florida. Naples RV Resort LLC is asking the County to approve this application to allow minor changes to the PUD document, which would increase the size of the allowed small utility buildings on each individual lot from 100 square feet to a maximum of 308 square feet. Changes are also proposed to the building setbacks for the utility buildings, which are reflected in the modified development standards table. Additionally the applicant proposes to delete the current exhibit that depicts typical lot details and replace with an exhibit that provides less detail, which will permit more flexibility while maintaining consistency with the approved development standards table. The applicant also proposes to modify the length of residency from 6 months to 9 months, which is within the permissible time frames for other RV parks. WE VALUE YOUR INPUT Business and property owners, residents and visitors are welcome to attend the presentation and discuss the project with the owner's representative and/or owner/developer. The Neighborhood Information Meeting is for informational purposes only, it is not a public hearing. If you are unable to attend this meeting, but have questions or comments, they can be directed by mail, phone, fax or e-mail by June 2, 2015 to: • Sharon Umpenhour, Planning Technician Q. Grady Minor and Associates, P.A., 3800 Via Del Rey, Bonita Springs, Florida 34134 Email: sumpenhour@gradyminor.com Phone: 239.947.1144 Fax: 239.947.0375 Naples Motorcoach Resort CPUD Petition PL20150000736 Neighborhood Information Meeting June 2, 2015, 5:30 p.m. A neighborhood information meeting was scheduled for June 2, 2015, 5:30 PM at the Naples Motorcoach Resort Clubhouse, 13300 Tamiami Trail East, by D. Wayne Arnold and Richard D. Yovanovich, representing Naples RV Resort LLC. Having no members of the public present the meeting was not held. 0 • 0 SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS • (Section 10.03.00, COLLIER COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE (LDC) A zoning sign(s) must be posted by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent on the parcel for a minimum of fifteen (15) calendar days in advance of the first public hearing and said sign(s) must be maintained by the petitioner or the petitioner's agent through the Board of County Commissioners Hearing. Below are general guidelines for signs, however these guidelines should not be construed to supersede any requirement of the LDC. For specific sign requirements, please refer to Section 10.03.00 of the LDC. I. The sign(s) must be erected in full view of the public, not more than five (5) feet from the nearest street right-of-way or easement. 2. The sign(s) must be securely affixed by nails, staples, or other means to a wood frame or to a wood panel and then fastened securely to a post, or other structure. The sign may not be affixed to a tree or other foliage. 3. The petitioner or the petitioner's agent must maintain the sign(s) in place, and readable condition until the requested action has been heard and a final decision rendered. If the sign(s) is destroyed, lost, or rendered unreadable, the petitioner or the petitioner's agent must replace the sign(s NOTE: AFTER THE SIGN HAS BEEN POSTED, THIS AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING NOTICE SHOULD BE RETURNED NO LATER THAN TEN (10) WORKING DAYS BEFORE THE FIRST HEARING DATE TO THE ASSIGNED PLANNER AFFIDAVIT OF STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER BEFORE THE UNDERSIGNED AUTHORITY, PERSONALLY APPEARED Sharon Umpenhour • WHO ON OATH SAYS THAT HE/SHE HAS POSTED PROPER NOTICE AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 10.03.00 OF THE CO' COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ON THE PARCEL COVERED IN PETTITON NUMBER PL201 D00796 Nao- M to -ch 3800 Ma Del Rey SIG OF AP LIC AGENT STREET OR P.O. BOX • Sharon Umpenhour NAME (TYPED OR PRINTED) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF COLLIER Bonita Springs, FL 34134 CITY, STATE ZIP The foregoing instrument was sworn to and subscribed before me this 30th Sharon Umpenhour personally known to me or who produced and who drd/dtd not take an oath. My Commission Expires: (Stamp with serial number) day of June , 20015, by �Y\r- Sign aa uree of Notary blic,/ �,loanne Janes" ,c�.,••.,°jce JQANNE,IANE8 Printed Name of Notary Public * * W COMMISM 3 FF09W EXPIRES: Match 14, 2018 �'rEaF��� Boadtdlhn&dpetNduySx'tkeo F:1WebsiteWFIDAVIT AND SIGN POSTING INSTRUCTIONS 5-2-05.doc as identification