Loading...
BCC Minutes 06/12/1990 RNaples, Florida, June 12, 1990 LET IT BE It~(EMBERHD, that the Board of County Commissioners In and for the County of Collier, and also acting as the Board of Zoning Appeals and as the governing board(s) of such special districts as have been created according to /aw and having conducted business herein, met on this date at 9:00 A.M. in R~GIILAR SESSION in Building "F" of the Government Complex, East Naples, Florida, with the following members present: CHAIRMAN: VICE-CHAIRMAN: ABSENT: Max A. Hasse, Jr. Mlchae! J. Volpe Burr L. Saunders Anne Goodnight. Richard S. Shanahan AL~O PRe, KIlT: James C. Giles, Clerk; Netl Dorrill, County Manager; Harriet Beech, Deputy Clerk; Sherry Keaton, Recording Secretary; Ellis Hoffman, Deputy Clerk; Ron McLemore, Assistant County Manager; Tom Olliff, Assistant to the County Manager; Ken Cuyler, County Attorney; William Lorenz, Environmental Services Ad~inistrator~ Kevin O'Donnell, Public Services Administrator; George Archibald, Transportation Services Administrator; Ken Baginekl0 Plan~ling Services Manager; Jay Reardon, Emergency Services Administrator; Robert Demarest, Library Director; Ronald Nino, Ray Bellows, Robert Lord, Philip Scheff, and William Hoover Project Planners, David Pettrow, Development Services Director; and Sgt. James Waller Sheriff~s Page June [2, 1990 eee*~ioner Shanahan absent a~ reflected An 4/0 votes*''. .Tape ~A A~ENDA AND CONSENT AGENDA - APFROVED MXTH CHANGES ~ismioner Volpe ~oved, ~econded by Commissioner Saundera and carried 4/0, that the Agenda and Consent Agenda be approved with the following changes: 4. Zte~#4 Add item 9G(i), discussion item regarding scheduling a Stormwater Utilities Workshop. Delete 8A regarding a Variance at Naples at the request of Petitioner Michael Brigham. Continue 14H(5) until June 19, computer equipment purchases. Continue 6B(2} PDA 89-X4 Crown Points, to July 24. Continue 6C(1) SMP-90-13 to June 19. Ce~Asai~ner G~ight ~, eec~ed ~ Cmteeto~r Vol~ ~ ~i~ 4/0, to a~r~e the Minutes of the ~1~ ~ti~ of A~ti 27, X9~. ]ml~.Or~ slmvxcE A~A~S PR~S~D Chairman Hasse presented Employee Service Awards on behalf of the Board to: Gloria A. Green, Social Services - 5 years Luz H. Pietrt, Library - 15 years. ltea~B FROCLAMATXON DISTgNATXNO TUESDAY, JUNK 12, 1990, AS NAPLES HXOH SCHOOL QXIqL8 F~T PXTCH SOFTBALL RKCO(INITION DAY - ADOPTID C~i~eloner Saundera ~, aeconded by Coniaatoner Volpe and carried 4/0, to proclaiR Tuemda¥, June 12, 1990 as Naplee High School Qirlo Fait Pitch Softball Reco~nttion Day. Page 2 June 12, 1990 ORDIBIAIJCINO. 90-52 RE IFETZTI01 !0. Z0-90-7, HOLE, MONTES & ASSOC~T~S, INC., RKPRF. SKNTZNQ CYI~MYD INVESTMXNT MAN&GI3~ENT, RE~UI~TZIJ4J AN ~ TO SECTION 8.23 OF ORDZNANCE 82-2, OFF-STREET PAKKII~r I~U~RKD AMOUNTS P~!TAZNING TO $HOPPZN0 CKNTKRS - ADOPTED Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on May 3, 1990, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition Z0-90-7, flied by Hole, Montes & Associates, Inc., representing Cynwyd Investment Management, requesting an amendment to Section 8.23 of Ordinance 82-2, Off-Street Parking, required amounts pertaining to shopping centers. Mr. Bill Hoover, Planning Services, discussed the background of the requested amendment to Ordinance 82-2, noting that staff's research indicates that the county had very lenient parking require- ments between 1973 and 1982 which allowed some of the existing shopping centers and supermarkets to create parking problems. In 1982 the Board substantially increased the parking requirements, he noted, basically doubling the amount for shopping centers and trtpltng the amount required for supermarkets. Mr. Hoover reported that resea=ch in this area indicates parking requirements can be reduced as recommended by staff in the executive summary, staff having found du~'tng a survey of 21 other communities that 19 of them have more lenient parking requirements than Collier County. He pointed out that the Urban Land Institute recommends still higher parking requirements than those staff is proposing and the Institute of Traffic Engineers has plotted peak shopping center parking demands for 178 centers. He noted none of the centers on the graph in the executive summary under 300,000 square feet in size have a parking demand exceeding one space/215 square feet which is staff's recommendation. Mr. Hoover stated that staff is recommending that parking require- ments for shopping centers be amended from one space per 175 squ~re feet to 1 space per 200 square feet for shopping centers less than 400,000 square feet, and without canemas/theaters that generate a large increase in parking demand. OO~ClO011 Page 3 June 12, 1990 Mr. Hoover explained that staff has taken counts at 15 shopping centers within the county during peak hours during the season (March and early April). If staff's recommendations are adopted, he con- tinued, the parking supply will have a surplus of ? percent to 140 percent at each of these centers, thus no problem will be created at any of the centers in the county by the change. Planner Hoover recommended that the revised standards be adopted because adoption will provide major public benefits to dramatically improve the aesthetics, climate, and pedestrian friendliness of shopping centers and supermarkets and will improve design requirements to ensure that parking areas are convenient and well-lighted, improve water quality and other environmental issues, and reduce development costs per square foot to be ultimately passed on to the consumer. Mr. Hoover explained that staff has modified their recommendations to address concerns expressed by the Collier County Planning Commission, specifically adding a recommendation that an area equal in s~ze to 7 percent of the entire paved parking lot and access driveway be created as a landscaped area tn order to triple the landscaped area and staff has doubled the required number of trees within the boun- daries of the parking lot. He noted that the recommendations also call for park benches to be placed in a courtyard area where 25 per- cent green area is to be located tn close proximity to the buildings. Commissioner Volpe questioned if this applied only to future shopping centers and Mr. Hoover agreed that ts correct; and Commissioner Volpe then asked if this ts approved, would it permit existing shopping centers to increase the amount of commercial square footage due to the reduced parking requirement. Mr. Hoover said staff has researched this aspect and discovered that of the 15 centers sur- veyed, only those centers within a PUD could enlarge because they have been required since 1982 to meet the 30~ open space requirements, thus centers like Kings Lake, Pavilion, and Courthouse Shadows can expand the facilities3 only if the water management, landscaping and green space requirements are met. Page · June 12, 1990 Mr. Hoover mentioned that at Pavilion and Kings Lake about 30 per- cent of the parking is located to the rear of the shopping center with no pedestrian cut-through to reach the supermarket at the front of the center, resulting in a 300 yard walk for shoppers. To address this in the future, he continued, staff has recommended that no more than 10 percent of parking be placed to the rear of the facility, unless a well-lighted access, architecturally finished and well-marked, is pro- vided. Commissioner Volpe questioned if an existing shoppll~g center desired to increase their square footage, would they then be required to comply with the new ordinance regarding landscape buffering and other parameters. Mr. Hoover said yes, they first must show they meet the ? percent requirement and may lose some area if they apply for this; this is included to discourage shopping centers from replacing parking spaces with additional commercial area. Mr. Hoover observed that large centers (400,000 square feet) with cinemas have far greater demand for parking than those without ,theaters. Commissioner Hasse asked what prorated the request for an amend- men~ to the Zoning O~dinance and Mr. Hoover explained that Mr. Duane's client is building a shopping center at the intersection of Coronado Parkway &nd Golden Gate Parkway in Go/den Gate City which will include a large K-Mart store and brought the matter to the consultant's atten- tion. Commissioner Saunders queried about the 1 space per 175 square feet for al/ other centers, considering the additional requirements for more open space, will it actually be more restrictive than the current requirements? Mr. Hoover said that staff consulted with several architects who believe that in larger center with 30 percent open space requirements, 7 percent of the paved area will take only 2 or 3 percent of the whole site; thus a good architect should not meet problems incorporating the open space area into a green area. .Commissioner Saunders restated his query, asking if one considers 00CC10013 Page June 12, 1990 the centers not covered, with theaters, etc., that are required to have 1 space per 175 square feet with limitations on rear parking, more requirements for open space, is this a more restrictive require- ment than the current requirement because of the additional open apace. Mr. Hoover said it is basically the same thing, but with better utilization of the site; referring to the Pavilion as an example, he pointed out that if it were built today they would be required to provide one space per 125 square feet for the Publix, and · the rest of the shopping center could be computed at one apace per 175 -~ . square feet. He said this would permit a little more retail area on that aite for the entire center, and be less restrictive. Co~missioner Masse asked if it would not be better to take the open space area away from the shopping area rather than from parking. Mr. Moover said that has been conaidered but if a developer has a .?.. ehopptng center with movie theaters, without a supermarket, the parking requirements are much higher than present, as well as i. requiring an additional landscaping/open space. Staff decided to ask ~. for double ',he number of trees, and triple the amount of landscaping which may add to the cost of the development, he said. Mr. Hoover ~ said staff wants to use the open space more efficiently on the site without having to subtract from the extra retail area That can be pro- .. vtdad. Commissioner Volpe pointed out that the present Ordinance does not allow for a variance in parking requirements and he questioned the possibility that the parking issue can be addressed on a case-by-case basis in order to be very site-specific as to parking requirements. Mr. Ken Baginski, Planning Services Manager, said that staff ia working on a Unified Development Code and the matter of a variance procedure is one consideration being addressed. He said that the pro- posal before the Board today reflects statistics and studies done by Collier County, U.L.I. and I.T.E. and adequately addresses the actual demand as well as providing relief in parking requirements to reduce the impervious area, thereby reducing runoff and providing opportunity O£CJOfl14 Page 6 June 12, 1990 for additional landscaping to aesthetically improve the quality of the centers being constructed. Mr. Baginski said there is a valid trade- off in reducing parking down to a standard, reflecting what is actually required. In addressing a possible future variance proce- dure, Mr. Baglnskl pointed out that a variance must be based upon hardship, perhaps geographic or land related, over which the applicant has no control and simply submitting a development plan with the sta- tement that the parking requirements cannot be met will not suffice. Commissioner Hesse said some complaints have been received regarding Coastland Mall and other large chopping centers that parking lanes or spaces should be numbered to facilitate relocating a vehicle after shopping. Mr. Hoover comme~ted that can be Included as a requirement for large centers, at the Board's discretion. Mr. Robert Duane of Hole, Montes and Assoc-tates, made a brief pre- sentation, ~aytng that the fine research effort of the county's staff has resulted tn a proposed amendment to the zoning ordinance that will be to the public benefit. He said that the county standards are SO to 50 percent higher than most shopping centers should be required to have in parking areas and looking at future build-out, there may be a total of l§0 acres more land area incorporated into parking in the next twenPy years, and any reduction in this amount is all to the good. He added that making a change from 3 percent to lO percent landscaping for these centers is beneficial as well and he respect- fully requested the Board's support of the proposed amendment. Commissioner Vo]pe asked if staff in the computations is using gross floor area or gross leasing area and if the answer la gross floor area, staff should recognize the need for measurements of commercial areas, not necessarily including walkways. Mr. Don Ptckworth of Asbell, Ha/ns, Doyle and Pickworth, P.A., said that he is viewing the proposed amendment with respect to a possible shopping center to be constructed on Marco Island with a theater. From his company's standpoint, he said, increasing from three seats per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area to five seats, Page ? i~ may not be economically feasible. ,'?-, : He pointed out that on page 22 of the executive lummar¥, Table ~;'-"' headed "Parking Supply/Demand at Shopping Centers with Cinemas" under both the Pavilion and Towns Center South on the busiest days, there ts a parking demand of ! per 211 and if that was changed to 1 per there would still exist a substantial margin of safety; so based on this, an increase will probably not create a problem. Commissioner Saunders asked if Mr. Ptckworth's request is for a ~:,& seating capacity of less than 5 seats per thousand? Mr. Pickworth agreed. Mr. Hoover said that what Mr. Plckworth is proposing will allow a movie theater of a size 40 percent of Towns Center South or the Pavilion to have 5 spaces per 1,000, but staff does not want to !~ be more lenient. Commissioner Hesse asked if the staff ts satisfied and Mr. Hoover said staff has no problem with Mr. Ptckworth's propo- sa~. Mr. Terry Lenick. attorney for Cobb Theaters from the /aw farm of Allen, Knudsen, DeBoost, Edwards, Roberts, P.A., stated that the issue of separating centers with theaters from shopping centers without them did not occur until after the Planning and Zoning Commission had discussed the matter and his firm only received the most recent change last Friday. He said the change being requested now essentially ,:i dllcrJmlnatee between a ehopp/ng center with a theater and one without. He pointed out that for one with a theater the requirement is ] space for l?§ square feet plus additional landscaping require- ments, plus additional rear parking requirements, etc. He determined that the change ks more restrictive than the present requirement and maintains it d/scrim/nates against theaters; he added that the evi- dence in Table B supports, not the ~75, but the ! per 206. Mr. Lenick suggested a compromise, either delete the theater entirely or increase the requirement to ! space per 205 square feet; Mr. Lenick claims this is necessary ~n order to increase the landscape area and provide the courtyard area/open space. Mr. Lenick presented a letter for inclusion in the record from Mr. 0C£ 0016 page's June 12, 1990 Lawrence L. Corley, an architect specializing in theaters, which stated that 1 space per 200 square feet of gross leasable area Is appropriate and any requirements for more parking than this ts excessive and will create negative impacts on the environment. He said he f~els that Increasing the Impervious surface will bring about a drainage problem, and he is requesting that the requirement be 1 space per 205 square feet of leasable space. Commissioner Saunders directed a question to Mr. Hoover regarding peak parking area use in the Pavilion and Town Center shopping cen- ters, at the Pavilion there is 1 space per 211 sq. ft., 76 percent of spaces filled; and Town Center South's peak use is 86 percent filled, 1 space per 201 square feet. He asked if those are peak demand days, then does it make sense to consider any different standard than 1 space per 175 square feet, or does that result tn too many parking spaces. Mr. Hoover addressed this subject, concluding he disagrees with Mr. Lenick because a good architect should be able to work with a ? percent greenery requirement, putting 1.5 percent or 2 percent in the front of the center for trees and green area. He stated he doubts that Cobb Theaters will have an economic problem with plantings. Mr. Robert Cobb, Vice President of Cobb Theaters, commented on so- called peak seasons for theater-going, that they are different than peaks for other commercial enterprises. He further noted that the theater managers checked the parking lots on 2rtday and Saturday nights at the Town Center South for several months, reporting that at the theater end of the center, the spaces were never completely filled a~d the other end of the center was about 75 percent empty. Commtsi3toner Hesse asked staff if they considered a ratio of 1 space to 175 square feet reasonable and Mr. Hoover cortcurred. There were no other speakers. ~Am~ione~ Volpe ~oved, seconded by Co~aimelon~r ~mad~m and cax~ .4/0, to clo~ ~ ~blic ~e~lng. June 12, 1990 :.? .:'a~14~4 am~ enters4 into Ordinance Book )1o. 39 with o~e ~:~ificatlon '~~ centwre of lees t~an 400,000 ~e feet; that the Rate $~r 1,000 m~z~a feet ~oee floor mxea, co~- ORDINJUICE NO. 90-52 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 82-2, THE COMPREHENSIVE ZONING REGULATIONS FOR THE UNIN- CORPORATED AREA OF COLLIER COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING SECTION 8, SUPPLEMENTARY DISTRICT REGULA- TIONS, SUBSECTION 8.23, OFF-STREET PARKING; REQUIRED AMOUNTS, IN ORDER TO REDUCE THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES FOR SHOPPING CENTERS AND SUPER- MARKETS: BY PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT AND SEVERABILITY; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. Zte~B3 ORD~ ~O. 90-53, R~ P~fITION ]0. PDA-90-2, VI6A, BROW~, STANL~'Y, ~Ut'TIN, P.A., ~~ING ~I~C~S P~ ~Q~STZNG ~ ~ ~ ~NCES0 P~ ~ ~ ~IRG ORDIR~C~ NO, 84-34, ~KCT~O~ FO~, ~ILITZ~S, HUBS~ION 4.3, WAT~ ~ SMR PROVISIONS, TO PROVID~ I~ S~R S~ICE BY ~E LO~ O~ FACILI~; ~IN~ SE~ION FI~, ~ION 5.2, ~ ~DIN~ VIDEO ~S IN ~ ~NCLOSED ~ ~ A ~~ US~; ~ BY ~IN~ S~SE~ION 5.S ~ D~TIN~ VIDEO ~R ~ ON ~T SIDE OF AI~RT-~LING RO~ - ~D Legal notice having been published tn the Nap]es Dally News on May 23, 1990, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to conslder Petition PDA 90-2, fi/ed by Vega, Brown, Stanley, Martin, P.A., rm~ressnt~ng Princess Psz'k requesting an amendment to the Princes~, Park PUD by amending Ordinance 84-34. Mr. Robe~'t W. Lord, Planning Services, explained that Princess Park was adopted by the Board of County Commissioners on April 24, lg84, as Ordinance No. 84-34. Mr. Lord added that the request ts "asking for an alternate sewer system to service the project which may be obtained from the Lone Oak PUD project to the east and also to all~ video games within an enclosed area. The permitted uses for th~s project are all related to commercial recrea~lon, both ~ndoor and outdoor, he said. :.. Mr. Lord sa~d staff sees no impact on the surrounding properties or roads regardln~ ~ndoor video ~ames as this ts considered co--arc,al indoor recreation w~th low intensity use, and the request ~ reaso- Page 10 June 12, 1990 nable and consistent with the growth management plan. Staff also feels, he said, that the uae of an approved sewer treatment plant with the capacity to accept the Princess Park use will be far superior to the septic field as presently planned. The Collier County Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of PDA-90-2 at their meeting on May 17, 1990, Mr. Lord reported, subject to provisions as stated in the PUD document and the agreement sheet, therefore staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve this peti- t ion, Commissioner Volpe asked if consideration has been given to changing or increasing buffer requirements between this project and the Walden Sake subdivision, particularly as some Go-cart tracks are proposed. Mr. Lord said security and site screening was not addressed during the approval process, but the Board has the option to address these issues now without imposing a hardship on the petitioner. Mr. Lord exhibited an aerial photograph of the area, demonstrating that screening and buffering of neighbors to the north and east is par- tially accomplished by the lake located between activity sites of the park and the perimeter of the property. He added that to the north there is a road and another lake, but he fe~ls there should be a security fence to discourage casual exits from the site. Mr. Lord said that the plans call for a 3 foot berm on the property line with trees situated every 50 feet. Commissioner Volpe asked if there will be an increase in struc- tures because the video games will be sited in an enclosure, and Mr. Lord responded that they will be located within the large enclosed pavilion already planned. Mr. George Vega, representing the petitioner, briefly discussed a written agreement between the petitioner and Walden Oaks subdivision to install a slx-foot fence, saying it is 90 percent completed at pre- sent and the petitioner has agreed to plant additional ficus trees along the perimeter. Mr. Ken Baginski, Planning Services, said that Mr. Lord came late Page Sune 12, ~990 ~'>t0the p~oJect and is not aware that about six months ago staff '}~revtewed.:c the plans and suggested additional landscaping/buffering be "~ .done on this property. Staff contacted the applicant, Mr. Baginski and through the Engineering Section the building permit was delayed until an ag=eement was worked out with Walden Oaks, and the petitioner w/ii provide a copy of the agreement. Walden Oaks has not contacted staff to indicate any opposition to this petition, he concluded. C~m~tsst~ Volpe ~ved, ~econded by Co~ts$tone~ ~unde~ : c~ild 4/0, to clo~e the Public Hearing. ~test~ner Volpe ~rved, seconded ~ C~tsetoner Sabre ~ ~~ 4/0, t~t the OrdJ~ce am n~red ~d tltl~ ~1~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ter~ into OrdJ~ce ~ok No. 39 w~th t~ ~t~l It~tion ~t i 8Jx-f~t ~=1~ f~ce ~r~d t~ pro~r~ ~ *h~ e~, e=cl~n~ the fret of t~ proart: ORDZ)IANCI NO. 90-53 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT ORDINANCE NUMBER 84-34, WHICH ESTABLISHED THE PRINCESS PARK PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BY AMENDING SECTION FOUR, UTILITIES, SUBSECTION 4.3, WATER AND SEWER PROVISIONS, BY ADDING AS AN ALTERNATE TO THE SEPTIC TANK SYSTEM, INTERIM SEWER SERVICE MAY BE PROVIDED BY THE LONE C~K FACILITY; BY AMENDING SECTION FIVE, PROJECT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS, SUBSECTION 5.2, PERMITTED USES, BY ADDING VIDEO GAMES IN AN ENCLOSED AREA AS A PERMITTED USE; AND BY AMENDING SUBSECTION 5.3, PROHIBITED USES, BY DELETING VIDEO GAMES; AND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. 90-54 RE PETITION PDA-90-1, VINES & AS$OCIATE~, INC. TOLL ~TE C~CI~ C~ ~Q~STINO ~ ~ TO Legal notice having been published in the Naples Dally News on May 3, 1990, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the !Glerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition PDA-90-1 fi/ed by Vines & Associates, Inc. representing Toll Gate Commercial Center requesting an amendment to the Toll Gate Commercial Center PUD. Mr. Ron Nine, Planning Services, explained that this PUD Is located at the interchange of 1-75, S.R. 951 and C.R. 84. He said Page 12 June 12, 1990 that the Florida Department of Transportation has determined it no longer requires the amount of right-of-way on C.R. 84, the extension of Davis Boulevard, and has conveyed that land to the proprietors of the Toll Gate Commercial Center. He commented that the boundaries of the PUD will become expanded by the amount of the vacated right-of-way and in this case, the petitioner has requested to include only nine acres more or less of that abandoned right-of-way (in total 34-35 acres), requiring an amendment to the PUD document. However, Mr. Nine continued, staff feels the amendment should include some use changes, initiated by staff, connected with industrial uses, and the deletion of a recreation vehicle campground which is inappropriate to that location. Mr. N/no said that staff has reviewed the petition for areas of concern and consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and find no problems with respect to this amendment that have not been addressed in the agreement sheet. He said the petition is consistent with the Growth Management Plan as far as issues of future land use and related levels of service are concerned; however, Mr. Nine continued, there is an issue to which he directs the Board's attention, this is not an amendment to the development order. The Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) has informally advised staff and the peti- tioner that this is a substantial deviation, and county staff has discussed the issue with DCA staff, Mr. Nine said. DCA staff has taken the position that they can avoid making a "substantial" deter- mination by requesting that the Development Order not be amended at this time, and they acknowledge the amendment to the PUD document and are of the opinion that this is sufficient action to allow the deve- loper to proceed with whatever development agenda they have, he explained. Mr. Nine stated that the petitioner recognizes that they ~ust come forward shortly with the inclusion of the additional 25 ~Lcres, which will trigger a "substantial" determination and con- sequently a DRI submission. Mr. Nine presented a letter from Mr. Pickworth Page 13 June ~2, 1990 agreement is being executed between the developer and DCA which com- mits the petitioner to submitting a DRI amendment at a later date which will include all of the vacated right-of-way that now is under the ownership of this developer. Nevertheless, Mr. Hind said, PGA does not have a problem with the immediate goal, to amend the PUD document to achieve their development objective. Co~missioner Volpe asked if the parcel of nine acres ts being added to the DRI now and Mr. Nino responded that is correct; and Commissioner Volpe said at some point tn time the developer will add ~n additional 2§ acres and then the matter will become a substantial deviation and the developer will have to go through a DRI process; and why not do it at the same time? Mr. Nino said he was not aware of the reason for this, but the PDA amendments are satisfactory to staff, will create improvement to the development and the Collier Gounty Planning Commission has unanimously recommended adoption of the PDA amendment. Co~ieetoner Vd/pS said then staff concludes this is not s substantial deviation, but the DCA does not '~gree. Mr. Nino said that te correct, but that the DCA will execute an agreement that avoids the issue for the present. Commissioner Volpe addressed a proposed deletion regarding outside display ~qd storage end Mr. Nlno explained that it Involves concrete blocks, Junked cars and build/nO materials. Com~leeioner Volpe pointed out that one of the permitted uses is · new and used car sales service and repair including outside storage. Mr. Nino addressed item 2.8, sayin~j staff does not want to see out- side storage of discarded auto parts and anything construed to be unsightly because of the high visibility of this area us a Gateway to Naples. They have no problem with new and used car use and display of the cars to be sold, but will adjust wording to eliminate storage of Junk cars. · : Mr. Donald Ptckworth of Asbell, Hatns, Doyle and Ptckworth, P.A., 00f C10022 Page 14 June 12, 1990 ;;said he will discuss the withdrawal of the Development Order petition. He said the situation is not complicated, Florida law requires, when dealing with a DRI, if any changes are made to a previously approved Development Order, regardless of the extent of the change, an analysis of the changes must be submitted to the local government, the Regional Planning Council and the State planning agency so they can make a determination that It is not a substantial deviation. In this case, he said, both the County staff and the Regional Planning Council staff have determined this is not a substantial deviation, but DCA staff feels it is. DCA staff then suggested that the issue be avoided by entering now into a preliminary development agreement with the peti- tioner which will order the petitioner to do what ts already planned with the PUD amendment, and when the petitioner takes the matter to the DCA for the substantial deviation review on the remaining acreage, this segment of acres will be included with the larger segment, he concluded. Today the petitioner asks only to amend the PUD, he reiterated. Commissioner Hesse asked Mr. Cuyler for his opinion and the County Attorney commented that this Is an unusual situation; however, the Board retains control over the situation through the amendment to the PUD, so Mr. Cuyler said he will not object to the arrangement. Commissioner Volpe stated he has concerns over splitting the Issue Into two segments, feeling It is a stopgap measure, and he questioned if the petitioner hall a development objective for the nine acre parcel at this ties. Mr. Ptckworth said splitting in this manner and amending the PUD is permitted by law to avoid going through two substantial deviation processes, and can utilize only one DRI review. He said the objective tS to Incorporate this nine acre parcel into the development area Immediately to the north of the power line, that ts undergoing deve- lopment at this time. Mr. Vines of Vines and Associates explained that the parcel we~t of the power lines has been platted and Improved and is ready for 00 (10023 Page June 12, 1990 i':idevelopment. The area east of the power lines is not ready to be ~ed, he continued, and the petitioner simply washes to add the nine acre parcel to the western area to Improve the circulation and access for the area tn the process of development. Mr. Vines ~.i explained that when the FDOT declared the right-of-way land surplus ~i'"!' and sold the strip along the southern boundary, it effectively cut off ~'~.. access to the previously improved PUD to Davis Boulevard. This applt- ' '! cation will reestablish the connection between the subdivision and the public road and sets the stage for replatttng to include the nine acres tn the plat, he said. Mr. Vines maintained that this does not change the permitted uses and even reduces them slightly, but it is the first step in a two step process. The second step, he said, is to enter Into a DRI process with the Department of Community Affairs at a 'later date. 4/0, to cl~ the ~bltc ~emrt~. 4/0, t~t the Ordt~ce u n~-ed ~ tltl~ ~1~ ~ ~ter~ into Ordt~ce ~k No. 39 ~bJ~ to ~t of ORDII[AI~CE 90-54 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NUMBER 84-6, WHICH ESTABLISHED TOLL GATE COMMERCIAL CENTER PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT BY AMENDING PUD COVER PAGE TO REFLECT NAME OF PLANNING FIRM SUBMITTING THE AMENDMENT; AMENDING THE PROJECT INFORMATION SECTION TO REFLECT CHANGES IN TOTAL ACREAGE AND DEVELOPMENT AREA; AMENDING THE CURRENT ZONING SECTION TO REFLECT THE PROJECT'S PUD ZONING; AMENDING EXISTING LAND USE SECTION TO REFLECT CO~/ERCIAL DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES UNDERWAY IN CERTAIN PARTS OF THE PROJECT AND TO ADD THE FORMER D.O.T. R.O.W. TO THE VEGETATIVE COVER; AMENDING THE WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT SECTION TO REFLECT THAT COLLIER COUNTY OR INTERIM FACILITIES WILL SERVE THE PROJECT; AMENDING SCHEDULE OF DEVELOPMENT SECTION TO REFLECT CHANGES IN COMMENCEMENT AND COMPLETION DATES FOR CERTAIN COMPONENTS OF THE PROJECT, TO AMEND THE DESIGNATION OF CERTAIN COMPONENTS OF SAID SCHEDULE AND TO REFLECT CHANGES TO THE ACREAGES OF CERTAIN COMPONENTS; AMENDING THE USE REGULATIONS FOR PARCELS A-1 AND A-2 SECTION BY CHANGING THE TITLE OF THIS SECTION AND THE REFERENCE TO PARCELS A-! AND A-2 TO PARTS WEST OF THE EAST LINE OF THE F.P.&L. EASEMENT, AMENDING THE PERMITTED AND PROVISIONAL USES SUBSECTION TO ADD CERTAIN PERMITTED PRINCIPAL USES, TO ADD CERTAIN PERMITTED PROVISIONAL USES AND DELETE OTHERS AND TO REFER TO THE NEW COLLIER COUNTY SIGN ORDINAl{CE; AMENDING USE REGULATIONS IN PARCELS B-l, B-2 AND B-3 SECTION TO DELETE CERTAIN USES; DELETING THE MASTER PLAN APPROVAL SECTION; ADDING NEW SECTION TITLED DEVELOPMENT INTENSITY LIMITATION; ADDING A NEW SECTION TITLED LIMITATION OF ACREAGE 00C£10024 Page 16 June 12, 1990 ;~: INCREASE IN USES CATEGORIZED BY CHAPTER 380 F.S. AS RETAIL/COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENTS OF REGIONAL IMPACT AND OFFICE DEVELOPMENTS OF REGIONAL IMPACT; ~ND BY PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. DOA-~-2, ~ILLLM~ R. VINES OF VINES AND ASSOCI&TRS R~PI~TIN~ TOLL ~1~.~~ ~ - Wllq[l~.~.~R AT ff--~OVEST 0P %q~ I'~I'XTX0'~ At the request of the Petitioner, this item was wIthdraw~. Recording Secretary Keaton replaced Delmty ~ &~D E~L'UTION OF AN ~ AND MODIFICATION TO OPTION FOR CO~Pm~T~0W - ~0 &CTX0~ Tim Assistant County Manager McLemore stated that the objective of the subject item ts to have the Board consider an amendment to the current lease option on North Horseshoe Drive. He indicated that the original lease option was prepared on June 14, 1988. He stated that at that tine, the lease provided a zero coat option for a throe year period, and noted that the county is presently two ~eeke away from the closure of the second year option. Nr. McLemore stated that staff has determined that the county will be much better served by the second building being directly adjacent to or west of the first building. He Indicated that this will allow for use of the same parking facilities for the two buildings. Mr. McLemore noted that the David Lawrence Health Center currently owns the subject parcel, but Indicated that they are willing to give up this parcel In exchange for another. Mr. Mclemore stated that Collier County is willing to build the · econd building for the same price that the first building was built for two years ago, and are also willing to Include the land exchange. Co,missioner Saunders indicated that when this subject was initially brought before the board, he had voted against It. He noted that It would be impudent for the county to move the government faci- lities away from its current area. He stated that the County Managers office advised the Board that the building could eventually be sold Page 17 June 12, 1990 and would not be a permanent location for that particular government department. He indicated that at this time, it appears that this plan/idea ts not going to happen. Co,missioner Saunders stated that there is not sufficient Justifi- cation to construct a second building at any location, and noted that he will oppose the suggestion that has been brought forth tn the Executive Summary. Mr. McLemore indicated that the property kno~rn as the Gal/man pro- perty to thu north is out of reach to the county due to the high cost of the land. He noted that the Gargtulo property to the south ts a very beneficial piece of property for the county at present as well as in the future. In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. McLemore Indicated that the knlildtng will allow for al/ of the Utilities, Tzansportatton and Environmental Divisions to be situated at tha same location. Com~lseioner Saunders stated that he was under the assumption that this facility is not to be a permanent location. Mr. Mcle=ore indicated that the plan is to facilitate the building, and if the county felt the need, the building could be sold tn · or § years with a profit for the county. Commissioner Saunders stated that the property on Horseshoe Drive · hould be sold, and in turn, the government employees should be moved back to the present Government Center location. Commissioner Volpe indicated that he is in total agreement with Co,missioner Saunders, and noted that he is not ready to make a deci- sion concerning this matter. Mr. McLemore stated that if the county had to bid on the building and the land, there would be a considerable cost differential. He indicated that the cost to build the building today will be approxima- tely $62 per square foot and $540,000 for the land, as opposed to $90 per square foot and $810,000 for the land if the building was bought at a bid. In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. McLemore stated that the Page 18 June 12, 2990 lease option deal ts the most cost efficient at present. He stated that once the lease option ts gone, the opportunity for th~e to arise again is also ~one. Commission,:r Volpe stated that the county has the option to keep the present building, at no additional cost to the taxpayers for one ~.~ · year, and in fact will actually make a profit due to its appraised :~:, value. Mr. McLemore agreed with Commissioner Volpe and stated that the present apprai~ed value of the building will increase approximately per year. Comm~ssioner Saunders stated that it ts not a reasonable objective real estate. for a local government to get involved with the buying and selling of In answer to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Mci.emote stated that the county currently has an option on South Horseshoe Drive going through the back of the County Government Center from North Horseshoe Drive. Mr. Clifford Barksdale, Collier Development Corporation, stated that the David Lawrence Health Center requires additional land for ['. their facility, and in turn, have agreed to a "swap" for the eastern I20 feet of th~ South Horseshoe Drive site. He indicated that by amending the current lease option, it will allow the county to have both options on the Northern and Southern parcels of Horseshoe Drive. Mr. Barked~le stated that if the county does not decade before December 91, 1990, to amend and use this lease option, then the whole lease option will be eliminated. ~M 4/0, tlmt ~ action ~ t~en on this Item at pr~t. Assistant County Manager McLemore =tared that the Garg~ulo pro- perry was appr~ised at $2,500,000 on July 5, 1988 and 82,800,000 on J~e 23, 1988. He tndlcated that tn Au~st of 1988, staff met wlth Page 19 June 12, 1990 Mr. Oargtulo to commence negotiations, and the initial asking price ::'quoted at that time for the property was 84.4 million dollars. He further indicated that the Gallman property, containing 35.27 acres, was appraised in June, 1989 for approximately $2,900,000 with an asking price ~sttmated at $12 to $15 million dollars. He noted that due to zoning problems, and preserve areas, only 4.27 acres of the 35.27 acres Itl usable land, therefore making this acquisition of land unworkable. Mr.~ McLemore indicated that e recent study was comprised on the total 9.57 ac~es of the Gargiulo property, and found the land to be totally workable and usable. He noted that the appraised value of the property has since Increased from the initial $2.5 million dollars to $5 mil/ion dollars, with an ashing price of $3.8 mil/ion dollars. Mr. McLemore stated that if purchased, half of the Gsrgtulo pro- perry will be utilized for a parking facility, and will allow the remaining acreage to be used for office space expansion. Clerk Gtle~ stated that Chapter 12§ of the Florida Statutes requires two appraisals when property of this value ts purchased. He indicated that the current appraisals are two years old, and questioned if new appraisals should be done. Mr. McLemore stated that as per the Executive Summary, staff is requestiDg thu authority to carry out these appraisals. ~ ~~ 4/0, te direct staff to proceed w~th the ~a'g~n~o ~r~oJect ~n ~~ w~th the Flor~ Sta~ee ~ br~ ~ck ~ ~t~t~e~ 0 C10028 · 99-12,, FITITION Av-ag-o20, &~NOLX, BAKBER AND ~ r.~'.~ VM~ATX~ OF A PORTXON OF TH~ DRAXNA~ EAS~M~FT ON TI~tCT '&' · ~D ~ ~F LOT~ 22B-132, VILLA~N~ OF MONTeReY, UNIT ON~ ~O PKTITXON~ Legal notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on May 20 and 27, 1990, as evidenced by Affidavit of Publication filed with the Clerk, public hearing was opened to consider Petition AV-89-020, · filed by Agnoli, Barber and Brundage as Agent, representing Monterey Aasocistes, requesting a vacation of a portion of lake and drainage easement to accommodate lake frontage lots for single family homes to ;i~ be located in proposed Unit Four. Mr. George Archibald, Transportation Services Administrator, stated that the subject petition is a request for a vacation of a por- ~?. tion of a drainage easement in Tract "A" Lots 125-132, Villages of Monterey at Woodbrldge, Unit 1. Mr. Archibald stated that the subject site is located off Orange Blossom Drive between Goodlette Frank Road and Airport-Pulling Road. He stated that the area to the sou~h of the platted properties is 'being considered for vacation. Be further stated that the petitioner Is requesting to vacate a portion of Unit ! in order to accommodate lake frontage lots in Unit 4, as well as realign the lot lines for lots 12~-~2. Mr. Archibald stated that the drainage area on the site will increase as a result of Unit 4 being platted and noted that there will not be a change in density due tc the vacation in Unit 1. Mr. Archibald indicated that letters of no objection have been received from the current Homeowner's Association, Florida Power & Light Company, Utilities Division and United Telephone Company. In answer to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Archibald stated that the surrounding properties will not be impacted by this vacation. He Indicated that the entire density of the development ~s controlled by :<' m PUD document, noting that Unit 4 will only contain single family lot homes. Page 21 June 12, 1990 00.t I ? Pl~e 22 3unm 12, 1990 ~!~ .,,]EJI~'L~~ ~ &,~i)CIATZON R~(I~STZNG FIN&ICI&L SUP'PORT - $300 Mr. Dick Longworth, Treasurer of the Naples Youth Soccer Aaaociation, stated that the Naples Youth Soccer Club advanced to the state semi-finals as one of four remaining teams in the State Cup com- petition. He indicated that the team traveled to Tallahasse, Florida, on May 11, 1990 to May 13, 1990 for the soccer finals. He stated that though the trip was a wonderful opportunity for the players, the team came home with a financial deficit of $650.00. Mr. LonGworth requested that the board conNlder h~lpin~ the team financially as they have in the past for the Little League state tour- namsnt participants. He noted that for past tournaments, the club depended on fund raisers and parental participation for their finan- cial support. Ne further noted that it was the clubs intent to keep the cost down to parents of the players for this particular trip. Ne grated that he confronted the City of Naples with their situation and asked for financial support, but was told that the City has a policy of not supporting Individual programs. Commissioner Volpe stated that it ts very difficult to Justify the support of one Individual soccer team. He indicated that he ts in agreement with the City of Naples current policy. Mr. Kevin O'Donnell, Public Services Administrator, stated that the public service account has approximately $5,000 which will support groups such as the Soccer Club. He Indicated that at present, there is only approximately $300 dollars left in this account. He further Indicated that if the club meets the application procedures and cfi- terta for these support monies, they could be awarded this remaining $300 dollars. Samnd~rmmov~d, seconded by Commissioner Vollm and (C~mmiamton~r Goodnlght out) to provide th~ M&plmm Youth with 8300 from th~ County's Public ~ez'~tce Flz~d &~c~mat mad di~t staff to study the contribution policy further. 3u.ue 12, 1990 ~ BIll,O OF g, OUTR'~gST FLORZD& - C0)IT/IIUgDUNTZL ..~ 19t 1990 Hr. Christopher Lombardo stated that the Seminole Tribe of F/or/da ~,:,, o~ns a parcel of land located south of Immokalee on County Road 846 and intends to develop a bingo center at the Intersect/on of County Road 846 and Eustis Avenue. He indicated that the tribe has entered into an agreement with Coryi Corporation for the purpose of constructing and managing the bingo center. Mr. Lombardo stated that in order to develop a bingo center on this particular indian land, the petitioner will need a determination from the board that the gaming establishment on the land ts in the · best interest of the tribe and is not detrimental to the surrounding comm~lnity. Ne indicated that this approval is necessary because the land in question was purchased in 1987 and placed in trust with the Bureau of Indian Affairs on behalf of the Seminole Tribe in November of 1959. He further indicated that pursuant to the Indian Gaming Act, Section a and b, a bingo center may not be developed on lands acquired ~n trust after the enactment of the Act without the approval of the !!' local government. Mr. hombardo stated that this project will be of tremendous bene- fit to the County and Immokalee and will provide a unique source of emplo~en~ for the area as well as a significant economic investment for the community. In answer to Commissioner Saunders, Mr. Lombardo indicated that the indian reservation is an independent sovereignty. He stated that the . total construction and zoning of the project is and will be governed i:i by the Seminole tribe. He indicated that the county does not have any regulatory control over the Seminole property. ~' In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Lombardo stated that the surrounding property to the north contains residential homes and directly across C.R. 846 is a couerctal center. He indicated that the surrounding property to the east and south is undeveloped. In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. Lombardo stated that the pro- Page 24 :i , be amended to read as follows: June 12, 1990 posed bingo hall will sit on approximately 5 to 7 acres of land and will seat 800 to 1,000 people. He indicated that the front of the facility will provide for 450 parking spaces and to the south of the building there will be additional Recreational Vehicle parking. Commissioner Saunders requested that this petition be continued for one week in order for the petitioner to obtain more Information concerning the bingo hall. He stated that additional information is required that will show buffering, set backs, residential impacts and traffic impacts to the area. Commissioner Goodntght stated that a resident of the area has voiced concern for the buffering around the hall and residential com- ~nity. She indicated that this concern has been brought to the attention of the tribe and noted that It will be addressed. ~tg 4/0, to cmtlm this ~tttton to Jm 19, 19~. .T~ ~ ~~ ~5, ~LLI~ C. ~Y Ol ~I~ C. ~Y ~ ~ ~9I~ ~ "~" OF ~ C-4 ZOMI~ DIS~I~ ~R A USID C~ ~ ~ ~~ L~A~D ON ~ ~O~ SID~ OF ~T T~ ~IL ~ OF ~ D~I~ - CO~I~ ~IL AU~ST 7~ 19~ Mr. Philip Scheff, Planner, stated that the proposed project is located on the north sade of East Tamtami Trail approximately 200 feet west of Shadowla~ Drive. He indicated that the petitioner proposes to obtain a provisional use "g" of the O-4 zoning district for a used car lot that wlii permit the marketing of used classic and exotic automobiles, on a consi~ment basis. Mr. Scheff stated that the area surrounding the proposed proJec~ As entirely co~erctal and is completely built-out. He Indicated that · the subject ~tition is consistent with the Comprehensive ei~ and the Gr~th Management Plan. Mr. Scheff noted ~hat stipulation "h" in the Agreement Sheet "Parking space 1 snail be relocated in .order to avoid any stacking on U.S. 41. Parking spaces 2 and 3 may Page 25 June 12, 1990 have to be relocated provided that at the time of SDP review, the petitioner can Justify that their location will not generate stacking of cars on U.S. 41. Plans shall be modified accordingly." Mr. Scheff stated that stipulation "v" shall be added to the Agreement Sheet and will read as follows: "The site plan submitted with this Provisional Use request, Attachment l, shall be therefore deemed to satisfy all the requirements of the Zoning Ordinance 82-2 (to include all of the forementioned stipulations)." In answer to Commissioner Masse, Mr. Scheff stated that 8 parking spaces for used car sales will be constructed in front of the building and 8 parking spaces will be reserved for employees and customers on the northeast side of the property. Mr. Scheff stated that the petitioner is not proposing buffering along U.S. 41 but is planning buffering on the east, west and north sides of the property. Mr. Dwight Nadeau of William C. McAnly and Associates, Inc. stated that the primary use of the property will continue to be minor automo- tive repair of classic autos. Mr. Nadeau stated that the entire site is surfaced with asphalt and has no existing native landscape vegetation. He indicated that the petitioner is proposing to place the necessary landscaping and buffering on and surrounding the property to ensure compatibility with the current zoning ordinance. Mr. Nadeau stated that the petitioner received numerous letters of no objection from the surrounding businesses concerning the land use change. He noted that the site will be improved in appearance due to the proposed landscaping of the property. Mr. Scheff indicated that stipulation "c" of the Agreement Sheet shall be amended to read as follows: "The petitioner shall reserve and dedicate 15 feet of the frontage along U.S. 41 for future roadway improvements." Mr. Nadeau stated that the 15 feet of frontage along the property will end up underneath the concrete overhead. He indicated that since Page 26 June 12, 1990 ' :ithe road right-of-way is outside of the petitioner's property line, it cannot be improved with any landscaping. He further indicated that the petitioner has no objection to additional landscaping improvements !inside the property line. Mr. Scheff referred back to the amendment In stipulation "c" and stated that the petitioner is required to dedicate 15 feet of the frontage along U.S. 41 for future roadway improvements. Mr. Nadeau stated that the p~tittoner ts not in a position to dedicate 15 feet of right-of-way to the county at this time. Mr. George Archibald, Transportation Services Administrator, stated that the county will not benefit in any way unless the 15 feet of right-of-way ts dedicated for future roadway improvements. Com~tssioner Hasse questioned the traffic Impact that this pro- perry will have on U.S. 41. Mr. Archibald stated that the entire frontage of the parcel ts :/ >driveway, therefore, the ability to provide landscaping Is minimal. i. He indicated that the right-of-way dedication will provide for a sidewalk on U.S. 41. Mr. Nadeau requested a continuance of the petition In order to negotiate the 15 foot dedication of right-of-way with Transportation Staff. C4~ed~i~r $~unders moved, seconded by Co~aissioner Volp~ 4/0, to continu~ th~ p~tttion u~til Augult ?, 1990. I~imty Ol®rk Hoff~an replaced ~cordlng Secretar~ l~eaton at this ti~ ,es ~OPPL~ ASRKIMKNTS WITH WILSON, NILLKR, BAI~I~3N AJFD PKEE, lilt. &lid ~ BO&DS, ZIC. FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITHGTUIqK SKKVZ~KS AND LANDSCAPK C01BTJHP~TX~ MOLE, RL~IrA~'r~Y, RKLATING TO AIRPORT-POLLZIHI ROAD SIX LAMXIIB &lid U'rXLXTY XMPR~ BrA'MEEM RADIO ROAD AWD GOLD~M GATH PaY - DESX~If OF IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN THE AMOUNT OF 98,700 ~ WiTu wO COteqXTPiEWTS FOR ~aWDSCAPXW~3 Transportation Services Administrator Archibald advised that this item addresses the need for providing landscaping In the median along Airport Road that is presently under construction between Golden Gate Parkway and Radio Road. He explained that currently the contract as Ot)l Page 27 June 12, 1990 desi0ned and let for construction does not include any landscaping beyond seeding and the placement of sod in some areas, nor does it include any specific lines for irrigation. He related that there will be very little bsautlflcation in that corridor. Mr. Archibald stated that one of the options that the Commission may wish to consider is to add the design and the construction of median landscaping: designing the water mains and the sprinkler systems; and the landscaping replacement of specific vegetation. He reported that this segment of the roadway 18 less than 1-3/4 miles in length and most of the median areas will end up being concrete tn one way or another, with the exception of 2,500 feet. He related that the design costs for the water lines, irrigation systems and landscaping scheme Is $8,7OO which will be added to Wilson, Miller, Barton and Peek's contract for the 6 lane design. He noted that the second phase will be the construction costs and the installation of the irrigation system and the landscaping in the amount of $92,950. He indicated that this segment of Airport Road will not be left with much of a median area, and noted that the improvements may be of some benefit. He affirmed that since the water and sewer line work in the median is currsntly taking place, this is the appropriate time to consider either the design, irrigation or irrigation and landscaping as part of the design contract or the construction contract. In answer to Commissioner Hasse, Mr. Archibald explained that pre- sently there is in excess of $800,000 worth of utility work being done by subcontractors working; for Better Roads that specialize in water and sewer main work. Commissioner Vo]pe indicated that the Corridor Management Plan has not been adopted along Goodlette-Frank Road and Golden Gate Parkway, and he is uncertain as to whether Just this segment of Airport Road should be looked at rather than the entire plan. He noted that if the irrigation is installed, some of the major developments may donate the plant material to enhance the community. Mr. Archibald explained that under a series of design contracts Page 28 June 12, 1990 ![iithat. will be coming before the Commission in the near future, the uti- i].'iit¥ work and landscaping will be included in one way or another. Commissioner Saunders stated that landscaping should be provided wherever possible, as long as there ts a sufficiently long stretch of ~edian, and if the design work is not approved now for the irrigation work, ~t will be more expensive later. He indicated that he believes that ~t is appropriate to approve the des~ work for the ~rr~ga~on ~stem as part of the road construction project. He noted that the decisions relative to median beaut~fication do not need to be made at th~s t~me since some of the co,unity organizations may become involved with same. amd e~Tled 4/0, to approve the Staff recosmendatton for the *8,700 ;.. 't~e~ ter~s of the actual landscaptn~ project. Page 29 Transportation Services Administrator Archibald reported that he ts reco~endtn9 that the Commission approve a contract with Wilson, Ntller, Barton, ~ Peek, Inc., for the 6 lane design of Atr~ort Road from Radio Road to U.S. 41. He noted that the total amount o~ the contract ts $251,840, as per the breakdo~ indicated tn the Executive S~I~. He lndicated that the contract amount is basically a s~ fixed price w~th the exception of: environmental perm/tt~ng, trafffic eng~neering study, and some out-of-poCket expenses that are not ~o exceed $3,500. Mr. Archibald stated that he ~e re~estlng that the Co~es]on approve the contract ]n the amount of $25~,840, and that the execute ~ame after confirmation ~s ~ven that funds are avaflab]e. Coolssloner Volpe questioned whether this contract includes l~dscape and architectural destO? Mr. Archibald rep/ted that until 30~ of the design has been completed, the amount or the locations of the medians that are available for landscap/n~ will not be kno~. affirmed that 6 lanes of roadways plus the a~propr~ate turn lane~ are ~ntended to be placed within ~00' of right-of-way. Finance Director Yonkosky suggested that if the agreement approved that ~t be contingent upon approval of the funding at the June 19, 1990 meeting. Page June 12, 1990 I:IV3~O~ OPIRATIOBI OF ST. MA~*S HOUSK - ~ ~blic Services Administrator O'Donnel/ explained that on Au~st 15, 1989, the Co~taaton agreed to lease eight park/ng spaces to St. Matthew's House. He recalled that the lease was executed on November :~. 2~, ~989, with the stipulation that after six months, an operation ~epo~t would be provided to the Co~lssion as to how St. Matthew's /j~ Ho~$e has complied with its prospectus of operation which had prev- iously ~en submitted. Mr. O'Donnell advised that this facility is within full compliance with the stipulations of the prospectus. He indicated that he requested that Compliance Services conduct an inspection of the faci- lity for life safety Code violations and they have reported that there are no violations whatsoever of the building, or health or safety code violations. Mr. O'Donnell stated that he ia recouendtng that the Commission accept this report. He noted that the lease is effective until November, 1990, and he anticipates that prior to the expiration of · same, he will present an additional lease for renewal to the Coutssion, for another one year period. Commie, stoner Hasse reported that he v/sited St. Matthew's House and he complimented those Involved for the Job that has been done. :~e~ mM 4/0, to ~cc~t the r~port indicating that St. Matti~m~'e · Mu~ {~ in ~lt~=ce with Collier Count~ Co&~m; mm~ that tdme ~tm~ wtll revisit the lease in mix ~onthe. 0~ITI~T AM{{IDM~NT MITE ~RAPT GO{{STR~OTI0{{ CO., INC. FOR CO{I~I~'EZ0~ OP T~ ~IT~O~SK PEDESTRIAN PL&ZA AND JtSSOCI&T~D SITE J~D HOADMORE - Administrative Services Administrator Ochs explained that this Item to a recommendation to amend the existing Courthouse construction contract with Kraft Construction Co Inc to provide for the Page 31 O0 ! .39 June 12, 2990 .~- :pedestrian plaza and associated site and roadwork. He noted that on March 13, 1990, the Commission approved a design and engineering ~L . contract for the final portion of the Courthouse project. Mr. Ochs reported that staff bas negotiated a contract for the pedestrian plaza construction with Kraft Construction Co., Inc., who was mobilized on the site, in the amount of $259,148. He recommended approval of the contract amendment and that the Chairman execute same, subject to review by the County Attorney's office. In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Facilities Management Director Camp advised that the proposed fountain is something that normally would not be provided, but since this is the signature building for the entire County, the architect recommended a small fountain as the centerpiece. He noted that this is the focal point of the complex Mr. Camp explained that there should be a comma between "Landscape" and "Irrigation" in the Executive Summary cost breakdown, and these are two major items. He indicated that another expensive item ts the functional lighting for the sidewalk and the area imme- diately adjacent to the handicapped ramps, and some existing lamps will be relocated. Mr. Camp stated that because this is a negotiated price, Staff and Winsor/Faricy Architects have made a review of same, and he believes this iea very competitive price. ~mmis~t~ ~$night ~ved, ~ecomied by Oo~atsmtoner t~ ~ ~ ~ contract with Kraft Construction Co., Clerk Giles advised that he believes that the Commission needs to waive the purchasing policy. ~mmts~ ~ight ~ her motion to tncla ~Iving of · ~ ~~ policy. ~sion~ Saund~rm accepted t~m Assistant County Attorney Wetgel advised that he read the comments from the Clerk's Office and noted that tn a situation where the work contemplated ts outside of the scope of the original work, it would be subject to a separate process of selection. He affirmed that in this Page 32 Suns 12, 1990 description of the work as a continuation of the Courthouse construc- 'tton, it is difficult to ascertain whether or not it is separate. He indicated that if the Board desires to go on record as waiving the purchasing policy in this regard, it merely is providing additional notice to the public that acknowledges this as being part of the pro- Ject ~nd the reasons for going forward with the contractor are apparent because of other work on site. I~l~m~l f~ ~ qu~tion, th~ ~otton c~ried4/O. '~-"~'; Page 33 June 12, 1990 Administrative Services Administrator Ochs stated that this is a consent agenda ]tem that was ~nadvertent~y placed on the agenda. He explained that the Limited Use AGreement between the Gouty and Waste Management, Inc., for settinG up staging areas for solid waste collection for a nine month period from January 1, 1990, to September 30, 1990, contained an error tn the landaus provision relative to the annual rental payment. Mr. Ochs reported that the original agreement provided for $1,500 In ~ual rent, and the clause should have read $2,250 annual rent. He e~latned that the monthly rental provision of $250 was correct as originally written tn the document. 00 )5 Page 34 June 12, 1990 County Manager Dorrill stated that this item was scheduled for June 19th, but suggested that since the Commission will be holding a budget workshop on June 20th, this storm water management subject could be discussed on the same date. Commissioner Volpe questioned the length of time that ts estimated for the consultants presentation. Environmental Services Administrator Lorenz advised that he believes that a minimum of one hour will be required since there are numerous items to be covered. Commissioner Saunders suggested that this meeting be scheduled for 11:00 A.M. on June 20, 1990. He questioned whether a Special Commission Meeting needs to be advertised for that date. Mr. Lorenz stated that he will be seeking direction from the Commission to begin the process of creating a rate structure, in add- ition to a series of recommendations to adopt Levels of Service Standards. County Attorney Cuyler indicated that a Special Board Meeting will need to b~ advertised. ~t~s~ Sw~eu~r~ moved, seconded by Commiaalon~r Volpe ~nd 4/0, t~t a S~Aml ~d ~tl~ ~ ~rtt~ for ~ 20, ~ ~ ~le ~~ of hearing the Stom ~ter ~t ~'$ THXRD CITIZEn'S T~LEPHONE SURVEY BY CHUCl~ NOHLE~ OF FRA~ER, Mr. Chuck Mohlke of Fraser, Mohlke Associates, and representing ~, the Institute of Government at Edison Community College, stated the i:.-. third telephone survey has been completed. He noted that the ~'ComJlission received the results of the survey on May 9, 1990. Mr. Mohlke explained that one of the things that is Important to Issess community attitudes is to determine whether the first set of Page 35 June 12, 1990 .il) findings remain unaltered, and noted that they did. He indicated that he anticipates that some of the findings relating to revenue issues will be useful in determinations that are to be made with respect to referendum matters. He affirmed that County residents have responded very positively to the programs which were identified relative to environmental protection concerns. Mr. Mohlke called attention to the issue of public financed health care in Immokalee, and noted that recent discussions relative to transportation for persons in need of emergency medical services resulted in comments indicating that this is a concern that ~s not yet at a level with roads, growth, and other persistent issues. He reported that the general level of satisfaction on this issue declined. With regard to revenue measures, i.e. gas tax, sales tax and the tourist tax, Mr. Mohlke affirmed that there is a high level of support indicating that these are fair ways to finance the programs as iden- tified. He remarked that 3 out of 5 persons feel that the sales tax aa proposed is a fair measure to provide schools, roads and other related issues. He noted that the negatives appear to be about 1/3 of those inquired. Mr. M0hlke said that he learned that in 1989, 2 out § of those inquired had lived in their residences for less than 4 years; in 1990, that number increased to 47%. He explained that this suggests that approaches to new residences are very much in order. He noted that concerns relative to zoning matters have increased 30%; concerns regarding roadway matters and the greatest level of dissatisfaction come from people who have lived at their present residences since 1985. He advised that the newer these people are to Collier County, the level of dissatisfaction is greater. Mr. Mohlke commended the League of Women Voters of Collier County for their involvement with the survey. He indicated that a check in the amount of $687 or $3.00 per interview will be presented to the League, and he hopes that they will continue to provide their support Page 36 June 12, 1990 and eervlce. Co~aissioner Volpe stated that tn his review of the report, it appears that the public could be made more aware of the decisions that are lade that affect them, and also that the County is not doing as well as they could in planning for the future needs of the community. He remarked that §0~ of Collier County's population do not know what they would do in the event of a major hurricane, and some focus should be given to this issue. Commissioner Hasse reported that Staff is currently addressing this concern, and noted that they are going into various parts of the community to educate the residents on this matter. He thanked the Emergency Services staff for the remarkable Job they are doing. Commissioner Hasse commended Mr. Mohlke and the League of Women Voters for their coordinated efforts tn conducting the survey in an outstanding manner. Page 3? Suns 12, 1990 Assistant County Manager McLemore advised that minor amendments have been made to the contract within the past couple of days, as a result of discussions between ~he appropriate attorneys, and approval of s~e is requested. He related that ~he Mandatory Collection Ordf~nce re~ires that a Resolution be established for the recyclin~ program. Mr. McLemore stated that most of the changes are corrections to minor errors in the agreement. He Indicated that the only real sl~nl- ficant change is the section which provides for the contractor's ~anagement team. He noted that Staff expressed their concern to Waste Management that the current management team remain since they have brought the Levels of Service up In Collier County. Mr. McLemore called attention to Item 6 on the list of correc- tions, which indicates that commercial vehicles and residential vehicles will be numbered separately so that they may be readily distinguished at the Landfill when they pass through the gates. He reported that the remaining corrections are minor. Mr. McLemore advised of three issues that need to be brought to the attention~of the Commission: Mobile home parks are designated as co~ercial entities in the ordinance and the majority of these are not under the County's billing system. He advlsed that most commercial entities are provided bulk service through bulk containers. He noted that there are a few parks that receive curbside service and this pre- Bents a problem. He indicated that the park owners have three options: they may elect to pick up the solid waste themselves, through an exemption provision in the ordinance; continue the bulk container service; or if they remain with or begin curbside collec- tion, their monthly charges may increase. With regard to bulk containers and the blending of rates, Mr. Page 38 June 12, 1990 McLe~ore indicated that the rates in the Old Marco and Naples District will be blended to have uniform rates. He noted that this will result An potential increases in the Marco area. He affirmed that Waste Management stated that they will visit each of these customers and work out a rearrangement of their eervice so that there rates remain about the same. He noted that this applies to commercial rates. Mr. McLemore advised that the residential rates on Marco will decrease, but the residential rates in Naples will increase about 3¢ per month. Mr. McLemore related that some associations will have to rearrange their eituation with members of their association because the County will be billing all classified residential customers, and Waste Managelent will be billing the commercial customers. Commissioner Volpe noted that there is a requirement of this par- ticular franchise for an audit, and the expense of the audit is to be borne by the County rather than the franchi~ee. Mr. McLemore pointed out that this is a recommendation as per Mr. Fatica of the Clerk's Office, noting that he concurs since it will be better if the County is in control of the audit and will be paid for by franchise fees. Clerk Giles advised that he was not aware of the recommendation laade by hie internal auditor, and noted that he is uncertain ae to whether he supports this, but he does not have any problem with this. He indicated that the Commission will be verifying certain revenues by audit, and the scope of the engagement with the County being involved with the relationship with the auditor and the management of Waste Management may get a little complicated. Mr. McLemore stated that there should not be any problems since the franchise agreement indica- tes that the records are open to the County. Mr. Giles noted that if the County bears the expense, Waste Management does not have the incentive to keep the expense of the audit down. Mr. McLemore indi- cated that realistically he does not believe that Waste Management will want to create any problems because at the end of eight years they will desire to come back and show that they have provided good Page 39 June [2, 1990 service and have worked well with staff, and will want mutual consent for the last two years. ' In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. McLemore advised that a franchise fee will be deducted and used for the cost of the audit. Attorney George Varnadoe, representing Waste Management, Inc., stated that franchise fees used to be paid 3 months in the arrears and they will now be paid monthly. He indicated that there will be a lot of additional work: recycling, Junk collection, unlimited pickup, and some of the commercial customers will be served at residential rates. He stated that the audit costs will be paid from the franchise fees, but he questions whether an annual audit is required since the contract is not based on the rate of return, but rather on the com- parison of other counties and the consultant's recommendation. With regard to rec¥clables, Mz'. McLemore reported that there is a provision in the agreement which states that if Waste Management can- not market the product, they must come back to the Commission who will make a finding of fact that there is no market for that product. He remarked that there are many things that will be monitored and he feels that the contract is a good proposition for both parties. Com~teeioner Saunders mentioned that there have discussions in the pa~t relative to the collection of the waste fees through the Tax Collector's office, and noted that it appears that there is nothing in the contract that is binding to have these bills p/aced on the tax rolls. He indicated that at some point, the Commission may need to determine whether these bills should be collected through the Tax Collector's office. In answer to Commissioner Volpe, Mr. McLemore explained that the County will purchase the first round of the bins, and the contract will maintain the serviceability of those bins and replace them with normal wear and tear. He affirmed that if the bins are abused or lost by the individuals, they will have to repurchase them. He revealed that staff is investigating the opportunities for a state grant for the ~urchase of the bins. Page 40 June 12, 1990 · lei. ~iel i/O, that t)~ J~a~t with Nacre tlmm~aeat, Inc. be ~ o ~ ~ t~t R~olutto~ 90-330 b~ ~t~. Page 41 June 12, 1990 APPROVING T]~ ISSUANCE BY COLLIER COU~I~ INDUSTRIAL ~ ~19,5~,0~, ~ ~ ~ B~ ~ ~ ~D~ ~ ~ D~& ~ILITI~, l~. D/B/~ ~ I~ Attorney Donald Pickworth, representing the Collier County Industrial Development Authority, requested that the Commission approve the Authority issuing a tax-exempt bond issue for the purpose of providing financing for certain water and system improvements to be made to the Marco Island Utility System, i.e., Deltona Utilities. He noted that these are private activity bonds issued by a public issuer for specific purposes. He reported that in order for the bonds to be issued, federal tax requires that there be an advertised public hearing held by the issuer to consider the Issuance of the bonds, and that there be further approval by the Board of C.~unty Commissioners. Attorney Plckworth advised that the public hearing was held on June 6, 1990, by the Industrial Development Authority, but no member of the public spoke. He stated that Utilities Administrator Arnold was present at the hearing and the Authority did inquire as to whether what was being proposed meshed with the County's objectives and he answered in the affirmative. Mr. Pickworth explained that the state allocates a certain amount of money in each of the 8 regions each year for tax-exempt bonds. He advised that Collier County is tn Region 8 which has a total of $28 million, and $10.5 million in allocation is remaining. He noted that Collier County has received about $1 million so far this year, and this is on a first come, first served basis. He affirmed that if the Commission does approve this issuance, an immediate request for allo- cation will be forwarded to the state. He related that any monies that have not been allocated by June 30, 1990, go back into a state pool and will be reallocated. In answer ~o Commissioner Volpe, Attorney Pickworth indicated that · there was a small expenditure of staff time involved during the past Page 42 3une 12, 1990 fe~ weeks, but he does not believe that there will be any other staff time expended on this issue. Finance Director Yonkosky explained that there has been staff time involved, and noted that other counties do charge for Industrial Development Authority issues. He indicated that staff has also been ~nvolved with the Health Facilities Authority and the Housing Finance Authority. County Attorney Cuyler concurred with Mr. ¥onkoeky, noting that et&fl hue spent more time relating to the Industrial Development '.~. i~.~- Authority than some of the others due to the nature of the project. ~'~ He noted that there is a public purpose tn the ultimate use of the ' funds and the Commission needs to weigh the factors that go into this. !,,, Attorney Ptckworth indicated that he has no problem with County Attorney Cuyler submitting an invoice on a time expended basis. He related that most of the time, the total staff processing time has been approximately 15 minutes, but this project required more time than is normally expended. Finance Director Yonkosky asked what the Industrial Development Authority charges for processing these? Attorney Pick-worth advised that there is a fee based on the amount of the bonds Issued. He indi- cated that on this particular issue, it would be approximately $22,000, and that money is used to fund the activities of the Economic · D eve lop~ent Counci 1. that ]~olution 90-:331 bet Page 43 Suns 12, 1990 Finance Director Yonkosky advised that this item is a recommen- dation that the Board of County Commlss~oners appoint a member of the Board or its Designee to participate on the Auditor Selection Committee. He advised that F.S. Section 11.45(3)(a)4, states that mudLttng services are required and an Auditor Selection Couittee which is composed of each ConstLtutLona~ Officer and one member of the ~ard of County Co~Lssioners. Co~Lssioner Hasse suggested that Co~Lssioner Vo~pe serve on ~he co~ikkee. Commissioner Volp~ voiced h~8 concurrence to volunkeer for khe co~ittee. Assistant County Attorney Weige~ advised that upon review of F.S., it ap~ars that there 18 a retirement for appointment to be made to the Auditor Selection Co~1ttee. Flnat~ce D~rector Yonkosky indicated that the co~ittee w~ll come back to the Co~ission with three unranked firms, and the Co~lss~on wlll rank same and provide the committee with a method of negotiating a contract. C~erk G~les sta~ed that proposals w~ll be advertised ~or a one year or three yea= contract. He explafned that if the Co~ission desires to have a renewal clause at the end of three years, con- lideration should be given to same. He noted that the Co~ission ~y feel comfortable with the auditors, but the publAc benefit needs to also ~ considered. He stated that in his opinion, Coopers a Lybr~d have ~en doing a good Job. Cowry Attorney Cuyler explained that if there is to be a rental . ~ii:i Page 44 June 12, 1990 clause, this needs to be a part of the RFP. ~ ~1~ 4/0, ~t MI~ ~tt~. ~'.. Finance Director Yonkosky stated that the initlal resolution ,~ approved by the Co~isslon was to buy the e~tpment. Re advlsed that ? current LeGislation allows up to 50¢ on a monthly charge for operatln~ ~, e~nses, which re. Ares the adoption of a reso~utlon. PaGe 45 June 12, 2990 1. That the final plat not be recorded until the re~tred Impro- vements have been constructed and accepted or until approved security is received for the lncompleted improvements and that construction shall be completed within 36 months of the date of this approval. 2. Authorize the Chairman to execute the Construction and Maintenance Agreement. 3. That no building permits be issued until the final plat is recorded. 4. No construction to co~ence until the zonin~ re-evaluation waiver is received. See Pages ~-~, /' ~, / / Xt~1411 Xt~m dfl4B2 DRAXNAG~ EASEMENT, AND LAEH CLUB DEVEX, OPMZFr coRpoRAT~cr~, See Pages Xtme1413 ~ ~~ ~ ~/~~JO~OI ~I~, ~. ~ ~ga3 notice having been published in the Naples Daily News on J~ua~ 25, 1990, as evidenced by Affidavit of ~bltcation filed with · he Clerk, bids were received until 3:00 P.M. on February 23, 1990, to consider RFP ~90-1518 - En~ineerin~ Services for Everglades City June 12, 1990 ,t. See Pages X~ ~14~4 Xt:em ~L4BO _B~fa_u'T,ij, XC, ATZ011 X.~r~.~V~a,.-~_L$ JLT,,O~eG U.S. 41 l~* WOR'f~ WA-PT--'-I~r- Xt~ ~14B~ rJXZ'~ ~I01"'ZC~ TO ~ I~R DKSXGIE SERVICES ~TZ~G ~ ~ ~A~ ~ See Pages ~'H' / -- ~~ ~ ~XTX~ ~A~G ~ ~I~ ~ AT C~ ~&T See Pages ~~ XteR E~4C4 COI~~~~O~ &GXWG CO~KXXXG ALZE~XI4~R'S lmii~&xi~i ~-=~-&M ffUllDlIG flOR ~ PERIOD dULY 1, 1990 - ~ 30, 1901 Xt~ ~/4C6 ~ SXIffX~ 0EE~II~XP OF C~R'T&XN ROd~)S VIA DKL'D~ I~COlqX~D FRXOR TO ~ XIL~FTXO~OlfTI~Pll~ RXD~E X~D~3TRIa~' PAI~XMU~CIPAL ~IRVXC~ T~X~ Page 47 June 12, 1990 OR Book 1538 Pages 1519-1525 OR Book 1538 Pages 1558-1603 See Pages The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a letter authorizing to place the sewer system into service and approving the water distribution system for service. OR Book 1543 Pages 985-1018 The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a letter approving the water distribution system for service. Bacteriological testing has met the County's requirements. The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been satisfied, and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting the fire hydrant for ownership and maintenance. OR Book 1543 Pages 1019-1032 See Pages ~'~--./~, I ,./W~' ~ A6--~.-~,5i OF ~/__~_.--?EY'B RR~IAUP3~I' SEWER FACILITIES - NI~ STIP~.~TION The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a letter placing the sewer system into service. OR Book 1540 Pages 1470-1484 '* r' ~ O~ COLLIER MEDICAL O~ ~~ ~ffi The Florida Department of Environmental Regulation furnishes a letter approving the water distribution system for service. Bacteriological testing has met the County's requirements. The Fire Flow requirements of the project have been satisfied, and the Fire District furnishes a letter accepting the fire hydrant for ownership and maintenance. Page 48 June 12, 2990 OR Book 1555 Pages 119 - 124 see Page.. I o 49. Xtra ~1.4li2 ~ ~ ~OIAIIR ~ ~ ltDlO RO~J) JOIIT 7JFfOl~ ~ ~ATIO~ D/B/A UNITED P~'~L S~VIC~ ~ RZ~T-O~'MAY AND ~1~ FOIFT l~;~__!C ~3_~T [~U~_, Uauz~x~x -~- , MCGAHEY, LEE ASSOCIATES See Pages ~ MI~i-~a~ ~I~)NI)[~O~ - FILD i~D/ORR~FD~U~D The following miscellaneous correspondence was filed and/or referred to the various departments as indicated below: 1. CC to Chairman Hasse of a letter to Paul R. Bradshaw, 3o Director, Division of Resource Planning and Management, DCA, from James C. Giles, Clerk of the Circuit Court, re Contract #90-LP-22-09-21-01-210. xc: Neil Dorrtll, Ken Cu¥1er and filed. Letter dated 5/17/90 to BCC Chairman, from Robert O. Nave, Chief, Bureau of Local Planning, DCA, re 90-LP-22-09-21-01-2~0. xc: Neil Dorri11, Ken Cu¥1er and filed. Letter dated 5/29/90 to BCC Chairman, from Patrick Kenney, Environmental Specialist, Florida Department of Environmental Page 49 12. June 12, 1990 Regulation, re: Collier County - WRR, File No. 111808345. xc: Neil Dorrill, Harry Huber, Bill Lorenz and filed. CC to Chairman Hesse of a letter dated 5/14/90 to Mr. Milton H. Leonard, President, Marco Island Civic Association, Inc., from Pamela P. McVety, Director, Division of Marine Resources, re request for representation on the Rookery Bay National Estuarine Research'Reserve Management Board. xc: Neil Dorrill, Bill Lorenz and filed. Letter dated 5/24/90 to BCC from Tony D. McNeal, Engineer, Bureau of Coastal Engineering and Regulation, Department of Natural Resources, Request for Public Comment, File Number: CO-259, Applicant: Lely Estates, Inc. xc: Nell Dorrill, Bill Lorenz, Frank Brutt and filed. CC to BCC of a letter dated 5/24/90 to Todd T. Turrell from Tony D. McNeal, Engineer, Bureau of Coastal Engineering and Regulation, Department of Natural Resources. Notice to Proceed Withheld, Permit Number: C0-226, Permittee Name: Donald B. Keller. xc: Neil Dorrill, Bill Lorenz, Frank Brutt and filed. CC to BCC of a letter dated 5/24/90 to William and Phyllis Johnson from Tony D. McNeal, Engineer, Bureau of Coastal Engineering and Regulation, Department of Natural Resources. Notice to Proceed Withheld, Permit Number: CO-261, Permittee Name: William and Phyllis Johnson. 'xc: Neil Dorrill, Bill Lorenz, Frank Brutt and filed. Request for Public Comment dated 5/30/90, To Whom It May Concern, from Tony D. McNeal, Engineer, Bureau of Goastal Engineering and Regulation, Department of Natural Resources, re File Number: DBS 89-247 CO, Applicant: Gulfview Beach Club. xc: Neil Dorrill, Bill Lorenz, Frank Brutt and filed. Division of Administrative Hearings Order Reactivating Case And Requiring Status Report, re Department of Community Affairs vs. Collier County Board of County Commissioners, Case No. 89-1841DRI, FLWAC Case No. 89-6. xc: Neil Dorrill, Ken Cuyler, Frank Brutt and filed. Memo dated 5/17/90 to Appropriate City or County Official from Bridget E. Dee, Administrative Assistant, Florida Housing Finance Agency, re Public Hearing on proposed rental development(s), xc: Neil Dorrill, Kevln O'Donnell and filed. Application to PSC of Florida Cities Water Company, Golden Gate Division, for a rate increase in Collier County, Docket #890509-WU, Order #22997, Issued: 5/29/90. xc: Neil Dorrtll, Mike Arnold, Mark Lawson and filed. Minutes Received and Filed: A. Devil's Garden Water Control District meeting of 5/29/90. Copy to Nell Dorrlll and Mike McNees. Golden Gate Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting of 4/27/90. Planning Commission Agenda for 6/7/90 and Minutes of 4/19/90. D. Marco Island Beautification Committee Agenda of 6/5/90. Page 50 June 12, 1990 13. 14. 16. 17. 18. 19. Notice To Owner to Collier County Government dated §/24/90, from Southern Machine & Steel, Inc., advising that it has furnished or is furnishing structural steel and miscellaneous steel for the Collier County Government Complex, under an order given by H. D. Rutledge & Son, Inc. xc: Neil Dorri11, Steve Camel1, John Yonkosky and filed. Notice to Owner to Collier County Board of County Commissioners, dated 5/29/90, from Green Thumb Nursery and LandscapinG, advising that it i. furnishing or has furnished landscaping and sprinkler system installations for the Collier County South Service Area W.W. Transmission Facilities, Contract #4, under an order given by D. N. Higgins. xc: Neil Dorrill, Steve Carnell, John Yonkosky and filed. Notice to Owner to Collier County Board of County Commissioners , dated 5/29/90, from FLM Building Products, Inc., advising that it has furnished or is furnishing various laminate products and miscellaneous plywood for the Collier County Health Public Service Building/County Government Complex, under an order given by Adams Brothers Cabinetry Inc. xc: Nell Dorrill, Steve Carnell, John Yonkosky and filed. Notice to Owner to Collier County Board of County Commissioners, dated 5/31/90, from Sunny Grove Landscaping, Inc., advising that it has furnished or is furnishing landscaping material and services for the median on the southeast corner of Pine Ridge Road and Goodlette Frank Road, under an order given by Gwen Butler. xc: Nei! Dorrill, Steve Carnell, John Yonkosky and filed. Letter dated 5/16/90 to BCC Chairman from Estus D. Whitfield, Director, Office of Environmental Affairs, Office of the Governor, re re3ecting any proposal that would extend Sabal Palm Road to connect with Miller Boulevard. xc: Neil Dorr~ll, George Archibald and filed. Letter dated 5/30/90 to Brenda C. Wilson, Esquire, from Sewell, Todd R Broxton, Inc., re Filed #01739-068, Leonard Yanks vs. Collier County BCC. xc: Neil Dorrill, Ken Cuyler and filed. CC to BCC of a letter dated 5/25/90 to Judge Blackwell from Louis S. Erickson, Sparkman, Erickson, Quinn, P.A., re Thad Christopher Oren, Case #90-167-CP-O2-WLB. xc: Neil Dorrill and filed. Page 51 June 12, 1990 ri' There being no further business for the Good of the County, the meeting was adjourned by Order of the Chair - Time: fi:20 P.M. Je minutes ap~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BOARD OF ZONING APPEALS/EX OFFICIO GOVERNING BOARD(S) OF SPECIAL DISTRICTS UNDER ITS CONTROL as ,resented ~.~, by the Board on J or as corrected Page 52